ellauri001.html on line 384:

Höyryää piippu, sylinterit sihisee,

ellauri001.html on line 706: Matkitaan naapurisedän Vanhis-soutua.

ellauri001.html on line 1053: märkyreiden kauhissus.


ellauri001.html on line 1326: kuuskytluvun rynttehis

ellauri001.html on line 1529: Laina-autolla hän lähistöä lähtee

ellauri001.html on line 1585: Naisista kaunis, miehistä rohkea aina hän olkoon,

ellauri001.html on line 2020:

Opetti hissaa M.A. Castrén,

ellauri001.html on line 2021: ite kappale historiaa,

ellauri001.html on line 2210: Rantaudun ja kokolle palaan: voi kauhistus!


ellauri001.html on line 2353: Syllables 5-7 of the second pāda must be a ja-gaṇa ("υ – υ") This enforces an iambic cadence.
ellauri002.html on line 68: This article is about the English musician. For the aviator, see John Dowland (RAF officer).
ellauri002.html on line 70: John Dowland (1563 – 1626) was an English Renaissance composer, lutenist, and singer. He is best known today for his melancholy songs such as "Come, heavy sleep", "Come again", "Flow my tears", "I saw my Lady weepe" and "In darkness let me dwell", but his instrumental music has undergone a major revival, and with the 20th century's early music revival, has been a continuing source of repertoire for lutenists and classical guitarists.
ellauri002.html on line 322: murehissa muhinoida,

ellauri002.html on line 366: murehista muovaeltu.

ellauri002.html on line 440: Tulee mielihautehista

ellauri002.html on line 663: Pois henki pihisi.
ellauri002.html on line 696: Kävi siinä vierahissa naapurista rastas.

ellauri002.html on line 1277: historiastaan, opettajista ja

ellauri002.html on line 1346: (his Slim">Memphis Slim)
ellauri002.html on line 1687:

Elettiin kynän, paperin ja lankapuhelimen aikaa. Ensimmäinen kirje don Caritalta Amerikkaan oli pommikirje. Siinä oli pommin kuva ja tieto, mitä olin velkaa. Olin ennen lähtöä kuhmuttanut dona Caritan isän kuplafolkkaria matkalla Turussa katsomassa Auli Hakulisen uutta vauvaa. Dona Carita lainasi rahat vähistä opintolainoistaan.
ellauri002.html on line 1693: Kesän kynnyksellä lensin takaisin Suomeen. Kylä muistan kun toavattiin ekan kerran yhdessäoloa pitemmän tauon jälkeen. Dona Carita tuli vastaan kadulla, varovaisen näköisenä: jatkuuko tää vai ei. Jatkui se. Dona Caritan kamarissa vietettiin kesäöitä ihania. Helppo nakki, kun Sysmän Suopellosta oli (pitkähkö) kävelymatka Talasniemen majalle. Juhannuksena "nukuttiin" his">Rauhiksen saunan rintelillä.
ellauri002.html on line 1700: Näppärää oli sittemmin, että dona Caritan kesäpaikka (isän maja ja päätalo Rauhis isän sisarusten hallussa) oli Päijätsalon takana, Majutjärven rannalla Talasniemessä. (Calle ensin luuli että dona Carita on sysmäläinen ja leipoo niitä hyviä reikäleipiä.) Nyt on Rauhis meillä ja maja dona Ritalla. Dona Rita löysi Münchenistä mainion miehen herrakansasta, pienen mutta vikkelän kuin oravan, väkkärän joka ehtii joka paikkaan, korjaa ja järjestää kaiken hyvin noudattaen dona Ritan käskyjä. Dona Ritalla on kolme poikaa ojennuksessa kuin Vilijonkalla. Rauhis ja maja eroaa kuin itä lännestä: Rauhis on putkinotko (taas), maja järjestyksen tyyssija, jonka laajat ruohokentät Der Barmherzige (peitenimi) meluisasti nylii yskähtelevällä päälläistuttavalla ruohonleikkurilla. El Lauri nyhertää Rauhiksen pusikkoon pienen aukon viikatteella.
ellauri002.html on line 1707: Syksyllä 1977 tuli lähtö MIThin. (Niitä lähtöjä ehti tulla useita. Seuraava muisto voi olla toiselta vuodelta.) Dona Carita tuli saatille Englantiin. Jönsy oli antropologian jatko-opiskelijana Englannin Cambridgessa. Olisko ollut kenttämatkalla Equadorissa, tai sitten vaan Suomessa, saatiin asua sen lukaalissa. Puntattiin Cam-joella ja muuta. Donna palasi Ruotsin kautta kotiin hirmuisessa sinuksessa. Asui Dona Ritan blondin kaverin siskon luona Tukholmassa. Sen kaverin, jonka mielestä filosofit istuvat miehissä pöydän ääreen, nojaavat päätä käteen ja sanovat: Nyt pohditaan. Siskokset hengas kurdien kanssa. Blondista tuli kunnallispoliitikko, kurdin ja sen pojasta lääkäri. Kurdit tarjosivat ruuaksi jotain kummia kasvispalloja ja lämmintä kokista. Varmaan felafelleja.
ellauri002.html on line 1770: Asui Bathissa hienossa kivilinnassa

ellauri002.html on line 1945: Ahistavat yöt opiskeluboksissa.

ellauri002.html on line 2069: ja kihisevät kiilusilmin pimeässä

ellauri002.html on line 2202: Ei se sotahomma kyllä sopinut hipiään. Kuten Nietzsche, inhoan komentamista. Ei tullut mun komentamisesta mitään armeijassa, kumminkaan päin. Kapun kanssa tuli kerran varsinainen High Noon, kieltäydyin jostain typerästä käskystä (mun historia) ja tuijotettiin toisiamme varmaan minuutteja, mä yläkerran portaissa, se alhaalla. Minä annoin periksi, olin kiltisti (mun historia taas). Tahtooko Miisu pihalle.
ellauri002.html on line 2252: P.S. Andreas Scholl (onxe sukua Dr. Schollille tai Johnin ja Miikan Schollylle?) vetää tän Dowlandin piisin hyvin. Se tietää että Dowlandiin ei pidä eläytyä eikä näytellä hikisenä ahistunutta kuin joku vitun David Foster Wallace. Dowlandin musiikki tekee kaiken yxin paremmin.
ellauri003.html on line 321: esim Pyramos ja Thisbe, Romeo ja Julia,

ellauri003.html on line 570: hän tuohon katsoi nyt niin kaunihisti,

ellauri003.html on line 659: Talon henki (hengetär, paitsi mies) oli Teris, siis Super (intendent), suomeksi sanottuna talonmies, vanha katolinen polakki, jonka seinät oli koristeltu paavin kuvilla. Siltä mentiin anomaan lisää lämpöä kun talvi teki tuloaan, ja pihisevä höyrypatteri kävi riittämättömäksi. Lumen tuloa ikkunasta hidasti calicokäärme, vanulla täytetty. Peittona pölisevä postimerkki, akryylihuopa ohut, lastenkokoinen, aiheutti öistä köydenvetoa, kahdelle se ei millään riittänyt. Kovina pakkasöinä piti lähteä kaduille dyykkaamaan roskiksista pahvia ja muuta palavaa, ja polttaa niitä huoneen takassa.
ellauri003.html on line 694: Merrillin viinabasso mörähtää peremmältä: antakaa lasten tulla tyköni. Mut kazokin Seizha ettei tämä toistu. Miehet tahtoo vaan sitä yhtä asiaa nimittäin lapsia. Ennenkuin huomaatkaan niin voi kauhistus: se on vuosi ja vohla, ja olet jumissa. Jos tulet järkiisi ja tarttet apua, sano vaan, mullon hyvä gynekologi joka ei häikäile.
ellauri003.html on line 817: Tyynen meren kohisevat aallot.

ellauri004.html on line 245: Kain olis pahis maajussi, Abel paimentolainen

ellauri004.html on line 443: pyhistä puhutaan muttei häiritä niitä,

ellauri004.html on line 708: Sprung in completeness where his feet pass
ellauri004.html on line 872: historiker.jpg" style="width:100%"/>
ellauri004.html on line 1227: his hour upon the stage

ellauri004.html on line 1290: Hyvää on pedolle saalis, saaliille pahis on peto,

ellauri004.html on line 1308: pahisten, hyvisten sisäkkäisiä sektioita.

ellauri004.html on line 1403: Hetkittäistä kehitystä, siis lisääntymään etevämpi sopeutuma, voi tulla arpomalla evoluutiosta. Näin kävi, ja kävi tosi hullusti, kun ihmiskunnan suurpesä pyörähti vauhtiin. Eipä aikaakaan niin voi kauhistus: termiittiapina löysi herkkuja, joihin se ei kyllästy, masu ei tule täyteen, ei mene maku, ei pitkästy. Hajuttomia ja mauttomia, lähes näkymättömiä. Niitä voi nauttia loputtomasti lisää. Ne maistuu hyvältä, vaikka olisivat täysin sulamattomia. Sillä ne ei oo sille välineitä muuhun, vaan itsetarkoitus: mielen herkkuja, huumeita, joista ei tule krapula. Aapan päässä ei ole niille täyttövarotinta, ei parasta ennen päivää niiden kyljessä. Antaa tulla lisää vaan, the more the merrier. Tästä alkoi tosi pitkä syömäpäivä, joka nyt vasta näyttää kallistuvan iltaan. Vihdoin viimein termiittipesä alkaa täyttyä.
ellauri004.html on line 1509: lipsuu vuodet, eikä pyhistelykään

ellauri005.html on line 90: rähisee peiton alta kiukkuisena.
ellauri005.html on line 236: Sillä mitä joku yxilö haluu ei ole kuin epäsuora yhteys siihen mitä tapahtuu. Halut on geeneissä, ohjaus tulee ympäristöstä (Herb Simon), ei murkku ole fiksu, vaan sen pesä, murkkupolut. Niiden seurauxena luonnonhistoria menee miten menee, tieten tai tietämättä, muurahaismaisesti.
ellauri005.html on line 648:

Ainoa mahis


ellauri005.html on line 782: Tää sisäistetty herruusteema tuli oppikoulussa vastaan siinä spartalaisläpässä, mis joku kundi oli varastanu jotain oravia (? tai mitä lie ketunpoikia), jotka söi sit sitä puseron sisältä nii et se kuoli kesken kuulusteluja. Ei antanu periksi vaik jengi huusi Tunnusta! Spartalaisten mielestä tää oli upeeta, mut meidän piti kauhistella sitä, koska se jätkä oli silmänpalvoja. Ei ollu sisäistäny jehovan seittemättä käskyä (älä varasta). Noudatti sen spartalais- eli poliitikkolisäystä: älä ainakaan niin et jäät kiinni.
ellauri005.html on line 981: mustien voittomahis on etukäteen poissa.

ellauri005.html on line 1062: Aika darwinistista on insestin kauhistus, saa Syntikin

ellauri005.html on line 1076: Piruista tulee sihiseviä käärmeitä

ellauri005.html on line 1140: Eternally noble, historically fair.

ellauri005.html on line 1316: And even though I know this fire brings me pain

ellauri005.html on line 1449: sen kauempaa ei siinä nenä tuhissut.

ellauri005.html on line 1506: Aatami ahistelee, perään painelee kuin pulu.

ellauri005.html on line 1662: Some pretty mama better come and get this black snake soon

ellauri005.html on line 1667: Mmm, mmm, wonder where this black snake gone?

ellauri005.html on line 1701: saanut kelvata mun nahistunut banaani.

ellauri006.html on line 36: Buddhism: 376 million
ellauri006.html on line 39: Sikhism: 23 million
ellauri006.html on line 263: kauhistaa kuoppa ärvöttävä.

ellauri006.html on line 398: Nälkäkurjen vauhti kiihtyy loppupeleissä. Paljon samoja kauhuja kuin psalttarissa: Rako avautuu maahan, suuret mullit, koirat ja monet turilaat ahistavat ihmisapinoiden lisäksi, rutto ja pahat mutantit raatelee, ketut popsii. Hyvixet kahlaa vihollisten veressä. Piscuisia lapsia paiscataan kiwiin simona, räjäytetään muksut ilmaan, veri ja suolenpätkät tarkoin kuvaillaan. Se luo motivaatiota yhtä verisiin kostotoimiin. (Kaikkein pahinta tietenkin on, että sankarittaren sisko kuolee, menee 50% omat geenit. Darwin rulaa kuten aina.) Heroes in the half shell. Ja ihanku Austenilla, sankaritar pohtii kaiken aikaa kumman kosijoista ottaisi, vaaleen vaiko tumman. (Spoileri: Se ottaa sen blondin, kiltimmän, joka osaa leipoa. Niin aina.)
ellauri006.html on line 402: Omalaatusia ajan merkkejä Nälkäkurjessa on invertti narsismi, et näkee ittensä koko aika kameran ja muiden silmissä: näytin siltä ja siltä. Sillä oudolla suomalaisella homolla (Miki Liukkonen: O) oli tätä samaa. Hurjasti sivuja siitä miten mun stailistit stailaa mua miehissä ja mitä mul on päällä. Mä katon itteeni videosta ja kuvista. Otan selfieitä. Calle ei edes kattonut itteänsä peiliin, vaik ois ehkä pitänyt. Never underestimate the power of the eye of Sarnath, I mean my stylist.
ellauri006.html on line 591: yli päiwä minä käyn murehisani.

ellauri006.html on line 859: ja cauhistus sattui minuun.

ellauri006.html on line 1057: sillä jumalattomat pitä huckuman ja saaman lopun cauhistuxella.

ellauri006.html on line 1309: Lukuun 19 mennessä kaverit on jo 10x pilkanneet jopia, jopin laskun mukaan. Pöyhistelijät. Jopi on ihan yxin. Ei parjaa enaa elamassa. Se ei ole tyydyttäwää, lähimmäiset wälttäwät, ja ystävät on heikon unohtaneet (paitsi te paskiaiset). Huonekuntaiset ja piiat pitää vieraana. Huusin Eeditiä, eikä hän wastannut minulle, minun täytyy rukoilla häntä omalla suullani, tai konkkaa ize keittiöön. Waimo wieroo pahanhajuista henkeäni, ja minun täytyy palvella lapsiani.
ellauri006.html on line 1352: Luvussa 31 jopi puhuu panopuuhista. Minä olen tehnyt liiton silmäini kanssa, etten kazoisi neitseen puoleen. Vaan liekö pitänyt se välipuhe. No ainakaan ne ei kazo enää muhun, kun oon näin rupinen. No jos oiskin joskus käynyt hullusti, ja sydämeni lähti waimon perään, ja wäijyin lähimmäisen owella, niin jauhakoon waimoni vastaavasti toiselle ja muut maatkoot hänet. Wuoroinhan sitä wieraissa käydään, saadaan toinen toisiltamme. Mitä pahaa siinä muuten on jos waimo ei oo warattu, kohdustahan me ollaan molemmat, se on vaan kohtuullista. Oisinko kieltänyt tarwitsewaisilta mitä he pyytävät? Oisinko antanut leskein silmäin hiweltyä, hiwelemättä myös takapuolia? Exs se ole ookoo et orwon lanne on mua siunannut, kun se sai lämmitellä mun lammasnahoissa? Hoitelin sen kuin omat sukulaiseni.
ellauri006.html on line 1356: 32 Sitten puheeseen puuttuu jolppi El Luihu, Barbapapan poika bussista, joka on ollut hiljaa kun arvokkaammat puhuvat, mutta kihissyt kiukusta. Ajatteli, puhukoot wuohet, wanhuus osoittakoon taitonsa. Mut nyt riitti.
ellauri006.html on line 1389: No jopia se pelottaa, jopi kauhistuu, ja katuu puheitaan. Se tuhisee nyt tomussa, ja pyytää lisäinfoa. Elifas et co. saa ansaitusti tuulispäältä satikutia. Vähän hämäräxi jää, mitä ne sanoi väärin. Ehkä ne vaan ei työntäneet kärsää tomuun yhtä syvälle kun Jopi, ei tehneet yhtä perusteellista jopia. Rangaistuxexi ne saa uhrata seizemän mullia ja saman werran oinaita, ja suosikkipoika jopi saa ne grillata (plus parhaat palat).
ellauri006.html on line 1404: Aiheesta lisää: Gregorius Magnuxen magnum opus Magna moralia on 35-osainen kommentaari tähän. Good job Greg! Kurkkasin sitä. Greg märehtii textin jokaikistä sanaa kuin lehmä kustakin neljästä mahasta noussutta märepalaa. Ensin historiallisesti, sitten allegorisesti, sitten moraalisesti. Järisyttävää pilkunnussintaa. Siihen tiedemiesten aika silloin meni. Nyt tähän.
ellauri006.html on line 1456: jenkkimulkeroiden ym pahisten.
ellauri006.html on line 1461: Mulle tärkeimmät on omat geenit, neandertaalimaisesti. Omasta itiöemästä en juuri piittaa, en ole siitä koskaan kauheesti tykännyt. En myöskään pidä ihmiskunnasta yhtenä kokonaisuutena, se on inhottavasti kihisevä pesä pallon loisia. Ihmiset yksitellen on pääsääntöisesti kivoja. Mut massoissa tyhmyys tiivistyy. Kai suurin yhteinen perintötekijä on noin nolla. Paradoksaalista.
ellauri006.html on line 1489:

Eric Hovind grew up immersed in the world of apologetics. He lives in Pensacola, Florida with his wife Tanya and three children and remains excited about the tremendous opportunity to lead an apologetics ministry in the war against evolution and humanism. Autuas on se joca sinun piscuiset lapses otta ja paisca kiwijn. Loppuu se evoluutio sun osalta.
ellauri006.html on line 1651: Don't grumble, give a whistle

ellauri006.html on line 1652: And this'll help things turn out for the best.
ellauri006.html on line 1662: Just purse your lips and whistle - that's the thing.
ellauri006.html on line 1746: Ei tässä ole mitään outoa, kidutus ja tappaminen on ihan ok, kunhan siinä noudatetaan sovittuja tapoja. Sekin on vaan osa termiittiapinoiden arkipäivää. Kuin myös sen kauhistelu, varsinkin kun uhrien joukossa on meikäläisiä. "Uhreissa ei tiettävästi ollut suomalaisia." Puh, läheltä piti, olihan siellä kai jokunen muu pohjoismaalainen. Hirviöitä!
ellauri007.html on line 118: Valkoposkihanhista on paljon harmia.

ellauri007.html on line 391: Off with his head! kiukkuisena käskee

ellauri007.html on line 1368: The tanuki, or "raccoon-dog," is a staple of Japanese folkore. They're known as tricksters, shape-shifters...and as a symbol of good luck. You can find statues of them outside of restaurants throughout Japan. They're considered lucky because their enormous scrotums (which are called "kintama" or "golden balls," in Japanese) are the source of their supernatural powers. Too bad Mario didn't get a nice super-sized sack when he suited up in his "tanooki suit" (as it was spelled for the English language release of the game.)
ellauri007.html on line 1464: Meistä miehistä on tafsaaminen mukavaa,

ellauri008.html on line 461: I found Conrad himself standing at the door of the house ready to receive me. His appearance was really that of a Polish nobleman. His manner was perfect, almost too elaborate; so nervous and sympathetic that every fibre of him seemed electric. He talked English with a strong accent, as if he tasted his words in his mouth before pronouncing them; but he talked extremely well, though he had always the talk and manner of a foreigner. He was dressed very carefully in a blue double-breasted jacket. He talked apparently with great freedom about his life — more ease and freedom indeed than an Englishman would have allowed himself. He spoke of the horrors of the Congo, from the moral and physical shock of which he said he had never recovered.
ellauri008.html on line 463: His wife Jessie seemed a nice and good-looking fat creature, an excellent cook, a good and reposeful mattress for this hypersensitive, nerve-wracked man, who did not ask from his wife high intelligence, only an assuagement of life's vibrations.
ellauri008.html on line 465: He made me feel so natural and very much myself, that I was almost afraid of losing the thrill and wonder of being there, although I was vibrating with intense excitement inside. His eyes under their pent-house lids revealed the suffering and the intensity of his experiences; when he spoke of his work, there came over them a sort of misty, sensuous, dreamy look, but they seemed to hold deep down the ghosts of old adventures and experiences—once or twice there was something in them one almost suspected of being wicked. But then I believe whatever strange wickedness would tempt this super-subtle Pole, he would be held in restraint by an equally delicate sense of honour. In his talk he led me along many paths of his life, but I felt that he did not wish to explore the jungle of emotions that lay dense on either side, and that his apparent frankness had a great reserve.
ellauri008.html on line 468: Super subtle pole. Kolakka polakka. A month later, Bertrand Russell visited Conrad at Capel House, and the same day on the train wrote down his impressions:
ellauri008.html on line 470:

It was wonderful—I loved him & I think he liked me. He talked a great deal about his work & life & aims, & about sother writers. Then we went for a little walk, & somehow grew very intimate. I plucked up courage to tell him what I find in his work—the boring down into things to get to the very bottom below the apparent facts. He seemed to feel I had understood him; then I stopped & we just looked into each other's eyes for some time, & then he said he had grown to wish he could live on the surface and write differently, that he had grown frightened. His eyes at the moment expressed the inward pain & terror that one feels him always fighting. Then he talked a lot about Poland, & showed me an album of family photographs of the 60's—spoke about how dream-like all that seems, & how he sometimes feels he ought not to have had any children, because they have no roots or traditions or relations.
ellauri008.html on line 472: My first impression was one of surprise. He spoke English with a very strong foreign accent, and nothing in his demeanour in any way suggested the sea. He was an aristocratic Polish gentleman to his fingertips. At our very first meeting, we talked with continually increasing intimacy. We seemed to sink through layer after layer of what was superficial, till gradually both reached the central fire. It was an experience unlike any other I have known. We looked into each other's eyes, half appalled and half intoxicated to find ourselves together in such a region. The emotion was as intense as passionate love, and at the same time all-embracing. I came away bewildered, and hardly able to find my way among ordinary affairs.
ellauri008.html on line 476: Bertrand "Marriage and Morals" Russell oli ilman muuta bi. Ehtiköhän se telakoida 17v nuoremman Wittgensteinin kaa. Näistä muistelmista vaikuttaa että Conrad oli Pertin sielun veli. Pölisiköhän nytkin patjat petipuuhissa? Merimiehissä sellaisia löytyy monia, kun keskenänsä viikkokaudet merellä saavat samaan tahtiin vedellä. Valasmies Melville oli samaa maata. "Scarlet letter" Hawthorne vallan pelästyi, pois muutti naapurista.
ellauri008.html on line 481: Vain osa kirjailevista miehistä on mieskirjailijoita, onneksi. Ne on vitun ikävystyttäviä. Klisheisiä. Ne hakee kunniaa ja tuntee häpeää, vuoroin ylvästelee vuoroin nöyristelee ja haluu päteä. Olla kuuluisia julkkiksia. Setvii uskontoa ja politiikkaa, valtaa, sotaa, metästystä. Sensaatioita, kohua, jänniä juonen käänteitä, kähmintää, pappeja, poliitikkoja, poliiseja, yrittäjiä, sotilaita ja lääkäreitä, rikoksia, väkivaltaa, höyryistä seksiä, kaunottaria, rahaa, ökytaloja ja jahteja, ekan luokan paikkoja, piukkoja paikkoja, tiukkoja paikkoja joista selvitään, tiimihenkeä, sankaruutta, tunnon tuskia. Kaikkea sitä mihin munapussihormonit miestä kuljettaa.
ellauri008.html on line 489: Hyvät kirjailijat on vähän sellasia androgyynejä. Taviksia. Ei kauhistele, kukkoile, kiivaile, nyyhkyile, hienoile, höyryy, uhoo, mesoo, hymistele, lyö rumpua eikä mahtaile. (Grassin peltirumpu on paska, ei jaksa edes loppuun.)
ellauri008.html on line 657: Conrad puolustautuu esipuheessa et tälläsiakin otuksia on. Se on yks meistä, se sanoo. Kuka se? kai Konrad ite. Keistä meistä? No miesasiamiehistä.
ellauri008.html on line 711: Jim oli peräsmiehenä ruosteisessa höyrylaivassa joka kuskas läjää mumslimeja indonesiasta mekkareisulle. Meinas tulla hukkareissu, laiva ruostuu puhki puolimatkassa. Länsimainen miehistö hyppää pelastusveneeseen ja jättää muslimit mulahtamaan pohjaan paatin mukana. Paizi ei se uponnut! Väärä hälytys. Ruostekaukalo jäi kellumaan ja ranskalainen tykkivene hinasi sen Adeniin. Allah armahti. Vitun noloa. Kapu ja kaverit anto väärän meriselityxen. Meni Jimin merikortti hyllylle.
ellauri008.html on line 740: Marvellous, he repeated, looking up at me. Look! the beauty! but that is nothing - look at the accuracy, the harmony. And so fragile! And so strong! And so exact! This is nature - the balance of colossal forces. Every star is so - and every blade of grass stands so - and the mighty kosmos in perfect equilibrium produces - this. This wonder; this masterpiece of nature - the great artist.
ellauri008.html on line 742: Never heard an entomologist go on like this, I observed, cheerfully. Masterpiece? And what of man?
ellauri008.html on line 744: Man is amazing, but not a masterpiece, he said, keeping his eyes fixed on the glass case. Perhaps the artist was a little mad. Eh? What do you think? Sometimes it seems to me that man is come where he is not wanted, where there is no place for him; for if not, why should he want all the place? Why should he run about here and there making great noise about himself, talking about stars, disturbing the blades of grass? ...
ellauri008.html on line 809: This book analyzes the representations of homosexuality in Conrad’s fiction, beginning with Conrad’s life and letters to show that Conrad himself was, at least imaginatively, bisexual. Conrad’s recurrent bouts of neurasthenia, his difficult courtships, late marriage, and frequent expressions of misogyny can all be attributed to the fact that Conrad was emotionally, temperamentally, and, perhaps, even erotically more comfortable with men than women.
ellauri008.html on line 811: Little is known about any intimate relationships that Conrad might have had prior to his marriage, confirming a popular image of the author as an isolated bachelor who preferred the company of close male friends.
ellauri008.html on line 813: In March 1896 Conrad married an Englishwoman, Jessie George. The couple had two sons, Borys and John. The elder, Borys, proved a disappointment in scholarship and integrity. Jessie was an unsophisticated, working-class girl, sixteen years younger than Conrad. To his friends, she was an inexplicable choice of wife, and the subject of some rather disparaging and unkind remarks. (See Lady Ottoline Morrell's opinion of Jessie in Impressions.)
ellauri008.html on line 837: Stemming from Ernest's treatment as a child, where his overbearing mother put him in dresses (a common practice then, but which his mother took to the extreme, even treating him like a girl), Hemingway had an interesting relationship with gender and his perceptions of it. He probably never engaged in homosexual activity but there can be no doubt that he idolized the male form. There are scenes in almost all of his books but certainly in his major novels where the men are presented in a homerotic manner. Farewell to Arms is kind of an eyebrow raiser. But this is also the man who wrote The Garden of Eden, which was about gender switching. Ernest's 3rd son "ille faciet" Gregory fulfilled his dad's dream. Go read Running With The Bulls. This is written by his son Gregory’s wife Valerie, who had to deal with the fact that her man was a transvestite and died from a botched sex change. Very few people know this.
ellauri008.html on line 912: Kulttuuriosasto on miehitetty talousliberaaleilla miespuolisilla paskiaisilla. Leffa-arvostelijat sitä yhtä omahyväistä Kaurismäen vihamiestä myötäillen lojaalisti haukkuu vasemmistoleffoja. Mainstream jenkkipläjäykset on enemmän niiden mieleen, on niissä arvot oikein ja sydän paikallaan. Saarnakolumneissa työrukkaset kuorossa ylistää yritteliäisyyttä, talouskasvua ja tekniikan ihmeitä. On kaikki hyvin, näillä mennään täysillä kohti ammottavaa mustaa aukkoa. Koneen hissillä pääsette tavaroiden taivaaseen.
ellauri008.html on line 986: jossa se tekee taas yhden yrityksen väärentää historiaa.

ellauri008.html on line 1101: "Kaunis malja leikkeihisi, ole hyvä!"

ellauri008.html on line 1104: Pomon hissipoika Touho Hyyskä eli Huusko Johto?

ellauri008.html on line 1447: Mystikoille oon aina ollut vihainen kuin rakkikoira. En nää siinä päätä enkä häntääkään. En liioin Simonen sepustuksissa armosta, panen toivoni mä painovoimaan. Kai kun en tunne mystisiä tuntoja, nöyryyttä, ei kuiski omatunto, suhisee vaan tinnitus, puuttuu hävelkorva. Pamputan niitä simona kuin sapeli Simonen.
ellauri008.html on line 1494: missä blancot kauhisteli brittinuorten

ellauri008.html on line 1601: Yläluokka laiskotteli, ei teollistanut, ja siirtomaassahan ne oli jo. Ahistaa olla kynimisen häntäpäässä, helpottaa kun samalla voi kyykyttää muita, kuten britit. Koira käskee häntää, vahinko pannaan kiertämään, eli ollaan maailmanmitassa kuitenkin keskiluokan nilkkejä vaik kotona köyhiä.
ellauri008.html on line 1612: Inkkareilla ei ollut habaa ja gringoilla oli liikaa voitettavaa. Maailman eli siirtomaasotien jälkeen puntit oli toisin päin, parhaat palat oli syöty ja aseistetut intiaanit hankalia, nahiskoot siis keskenään. Niitä voi paremmin ohjailla rahoittamalla diktaattoreita ja CIAn agenteilla. Tilanne on taas päällä Venezuelassa.
ellauri008.html on line 1639: Lihakset on heikot. Jäsenet jäykät paitsi se jonka pitäisi olla. Jalka ei nouse. Ei jaksa kumartua. Rakko täyttyy, ei enää veny, ei tyhjene. Yöllä herää kuselle. Kusi tulee vaivoin. Niskaa ja näpytyskättä särkee. Ruoka ei sula. Rintaan tai mahaan sattuu syötyä. Pierettää. Jotain alavatsan kipuja. Varmaan peräpukamat. Munuaiset juilii välistä. Henki loppuu kesken lausetta. Oikea silmä on ratkennut. Näkö sumenee. Kihti pistää isovarvasta. Väsyttää helposti. Yöllä ilma vihisee, portaissa hengästyttää. Lonkkaa vetää, kalkkeutuneet nivelet, luupiikkejä. Selässä on joku patti. Torkuttaa.
ellauri008.html on line 1927: Herrahissi huojuu iskun voimasta.

ellauri008.html on line 1951:

Paavin hissi


ellauri008.html on line 1953: Paavi juuttui sunnuntaina hissiin.

ellauri008.html on line 1956: Sähkö katkesi, paavin hissi pimeni.

ellauri008.html on line 1959: Palomiehet sai hissin taas käyntiin.

ellauri008.html on line 1963: Taivaalle kiitos palomiehistä,

ellauri008.html on line 2099: keskeneräisessä hississä tai kellarissa

ellauri008.html on line 2118: jossain bangladeshissä tai afrikassa.

ellauri008.html on line 2150: Mä vien meidät mun hotellihuoneeseen. Älä nyt katso mua noin. En ole homo. Etkä sä ole minun tyyppiäni. Mä pidän miehistä, jotka pystyvät huutamaan, kun panen niitä perseeseen. Sä et pystyisi muuhun kuin raapimaan patjaa. Totta puhuen se ei riitä mulle. Pitää kuulua vähän ääntäkin.
ellauri008.html on line 2212: Harmaakaihistakin voitais näillä keinoin päästä eroon

ellauri009.html on line 127: Onko kukaan vetänyt loppupäätelmää kasautumisesta? Kun kapitaali ei enää tarvii laboria, ei edes kuluttajixi? Kun niillä ei enää ole ostovoimaa, niistä ei ole enää mihinkään. Mänkööt vaan rupusakki huuthelekkariin, me ja ropotit pärjätään keskenämme. Siitä sit vasta maailmansota tulee, oikea harmageddon. Osattomat näyttävät mistä kana kusee. Tai sitten ei. Ylen surullisilta vain ehkä näyttävät. Kunnon vallankumouxet alkaa, kun joku ennen mitätön porukka vahvistuu. Heikot ei ala vallankumouxia, ne hävii niitä. Usein ensin hävitään sota herrojen kesken tai ulkomailla, aloitettu kansan napinan vaientamisexi (ulkoinen vihollinen saa unohtamaan sisäisen, sitäpaitsi sota on jännittävä lottoarvonta, oiva mahis säätykiertoon). Tappion kärsinyt vanha valta kaatuu, tulee uusi sortaja tilalle. Ihan kuin de Waalin apinoilla.
ellauri009.html on line 153: historiker.jpg" style="width:100%"/>
ellauri009.html on line 231: Tää näkyy kaikissa historian käänteissä. Onni ja suvakkius liittyy kasvu (ja ryöstö) vaiheisiin, kärhämät ja vallankumouxet stagnaatioon. Vallanpitäjät ezii ulkovihulaisia kun kansa napisee. Kun sota hävitään, hallizijan pää on vadilla, vallankumous tulee.
ellauri009.html on line 244: Muruja putoo rikkaan pöydältä köyhälistölle, niiden ja keskiluokan tuloerot tasaantuu, köyhistä tulee laiskaa ja vaativaista alempa keskiluokkaa. Silloin aletaan ettiä uusia entistä köyhempiä riistettäviä kauempaa. Tää on globalisaatiota. Kiina ja Intia rikastuu ja siirtää sweatshopit Afrikkaan. Seuraavaxi luova tuho iskee niihin, tehtaissa raataa halvalla ropotit, tehtaat voidaan siis siirtää takaisin kotimaahan. Orjat nuolee näppejään tai sortteeraavat jätteitä.
ellauri009.html on line 246: Toiseen suuntaan ei myydä, kauppa on rikkaaseen päin. Paitsi rikkaiden jätteet tai ylituotanto: samoissa köyhissä maissa pennosella valmistetut, länteen kuskatut rumat trikoot, teepaidat, parasta ennen päivän ohittane iskulauseineen ja painokuvineen, ylihinnoiteltuina tai käytettyinä, tupataan paaleittain takaisin köyhille vaikka väkisin, talouspakottein ja pyssynsuulla uhaten. Mutiaisten lapset selaa vaarallisia romukasoja, lajittelee elektroniikkajätteitä paljailla pikku käsillä.
ellauri009.html on line 438:
  • Pahis
    ellauri009.html on line 535: joka mokasi, se on jo historiaa.
    ellauri009.html on line 700: You probably think this song is about you

    ellauri009.html on line 702: I bet you think this song is about you

    ellauri009.html on line 719: Siinä yhistyvät kilpailu- ja tiimihenki,

    ellauri009.html on line 1063: Rassut tuvassa, tuhisevat rassut.

    ellauri009.html on line 1415: Taustalla lilluu hissimusiikki

    ellauri009.html on line 1433: Kaunistukkaisesta esikuvasta voi olla iloa, jos pojalla ei ole isää, tai se on kamala. Mitenkään vihjaamatta, että mun isi olisi ollut. Mutta kyllä isi oli äkkipikaisempi kuin Lauri Kiuru. Ope ei koskaan rähissyt mulle, en ainakaan muista.
    ellauri009.html on line 1509: on rähjäinen ja rottia kuhiseva metropoli.

    ellauri009.html on line 1689: Kylläpä on humanistimetkut muuttuneet vuosikymmenten saatossa. Kun tulin verstaalle ammoin, istuivat yliopistomiehet keskenänsä sprigi päällä arvokkasti arvokkaassa salissa, perusteli ja päätti asiat miehissä puhuen toistensa ohi kirjakielellä kuin Irjan radiot. Satraapit vartioivat pikku valtakuntiaan ja puukottivat selkään toisiansa sivistyneesti ja kiireettä. Nyt istuu kaikki matut lehtorit ja muut rotinkaiset mukanlukien virolaisten saippuanhajuisessa uimahallissa, värikkäässä kalvoshowssa, siniset punaiset ja vihreät laput otsassa kuin tarhalapset. Puuttuu vaan keltaiset huomioliivit ja ohjanaru. Puretaan ryhmätöitä toistemme suuhun huutaen ja hälisten hoonolla englannilla minuuttipelillä, kovaääniset hiiret mikit kädessä. Dekaania myöten kaikki ovat naisia, paria väpelöä ponnaripäistä poikaa ja muutamaa nisäkkäiden keskeen erehtyneen sauruksen näköistä setämiestä lukuun ottamatta. Kello käy, suut käyvät, keksitään avainsanoja ja onelinereita toimivan johdon strategiatyöhön, ulkoinen konsultti alustaa vulgääristi, luurit välähtelee, kamerat räpsyvät.
    ellauri009.html on line 1704: Eikä päiväkausiin miehistö niinollen syönyt kai

    ellauri009.html on line 1717: Ja tisleiden lähdettä miehistö pui

    ellauri011.html on line 45: That all was over on this side the tomb,

    ellauri011.html on line 321: Syyskuun kolmannen viikonlopun sunnuntain aamu vaalenee Rauhiksessa. Käyn kuudennen kerran samana yönä keittiöstä kusella. Viisi kertaa pimeässä, nyt on valoisampaa. Jälkeenjääneet linnut rähisee freneettisesti puissa ja kellastuvissa puskissa. On niitä sentään vielä. Joutsenet puupittaa lennossa joen yllä kuin peruuttavat rekat.
    ellauri011.html on line 430: Myös uramaisemat mainiot nilkkien hissistä aukee:

    ellauri011.html on line 505: During the 1970s, he started taking cannabis as he was freed from his family. His theater success was more than his writing career, and his writing failures caused his inclination towards black magic.
    ellauri011.html on line 507: In late 1971, he met Gisa, and few weeks after, they got married. When his wife got pregnant, he convinced her to abort the child, that emotionally drained her.
    ellauri011.html on line 509: In 1974, he and his wife, Gisa, were arrested in Rio de Janeiro, where they were tortured for few days. Though the couple was released, his wife left him after this incidence as she suffered from Paranoia.
    ellauri011.html on line 514: It is quite captivating that he wrote his bestseller “The Alchemist” (1998) in just 2 weeks.
    ellauri011.html on line 529: • In 2016, a Sydney-based jewelry designer, Laura Byrne, claimed that Coelho took a quote that she posted on Instagram in 2014 and used it as his own by posting it to his social media page on January 6, 2016.
    ellauri011.html on line 560: His work has been published in more than 170 countries and translated into eighty languages. Together, his books have sold in the hundreds of millions. On 22 December 2016, Coelho was listed by UK-based company Richtopia at number 2 in the list of 200 most influential contemporary authors.
    ellauri011.html on line 566: In his central figure, not-quite-Paulo, he has created (I imagine by mistake) a devastating portrait of a man whose stock in trade is spirituality but who is worldly to his very toenails, exquisitely attuned to his own status. He is constantly reminding himself how many books he has sold, how many languages they have been translated into, and that he is 'despite all the adverse reviews, a possible candidate for a major literary prize'. When he takes up with another woman (strictly to dispel the Zahir, of course), he chooses a successful French actress of 35, on the grounds that she was the only candidate to enjoy his status, 'because she too was famous and knew that celebrity counts'. Celebrity is an aphrodisiac. 'It was good for a woman's ego to be with a man and know that he had chosen her even though he had had the pick of many others.' And the man's ego, does that come into it? Not-quite-Paulo is too gallant to reveal his own age, but if he is indeed a refraction of the author then he is 20 years Marie's senior. It's adorable that he should regard himself so solemnly as the trophy in this pairing.
    ellauri011.html on line 568: The grotesque climax of this portrait comes at a formal dinner which has no bearing on the plot (but then padding can become second nature). Some of the guests give him a smile of recognition, 'others merely smile and don't recognise me at all, but pretend to know who I am, because to admit otherwise would be to accept that the world they're living in doesn't exist, and that they are failing to keep up with the things that matter'. People can be so shallow sometimes.

    ellauri011.html on line 769: Yxinkertaiset miesasiamiehiset tolloajatukset hippikuorrutuxen peitossa. Kermavaahtoa mansikkahilloa ja kaupan marenkia ostokakkupohjalla.
    ellauri011.html on line 877: Pakko palata tähän Paulon pyhis/tavis jakomielisyyteen. Se on luontojaan hömelö hippi, tuiki tavallinen juippi, mutta vähän väliä se pälähtää simona siunaamaan ja saarnaamaan, ihan kesken lausetta, ihankun siltä katkeaisi piuha, se unohtaisi kuka se on ja missä mennään, ja yks kaks muistaisi hei mullahan on gurupipo päässä.
    ellauri011.html on line 881: Ei sitä kiinnosta pätkääkään historia, ei oikein eikä vasein, sehän on vain maallista. Tyyyyylsäää. Kukin olkoon vaan oman sielun valaistuksen seppo. Ja miljoonien dollareiden, jos käy oikein hyvä pulla, niinkuin mulla.
    ellauri011.html on line 898: Paulo began emptying his mind. It wasn't difficult, there wasn't all that much work to do. Paulo cannot see things how they really are, for all the invisible things he thinks there ought to be.
    ellauri011.html on line 912:
    No, he did not love her. The night they returned from Asia, just after dinner, they made amazing love that left her soaking in sweat, satisfied, and ready to do anything for this man. But he was talking to her less and less.
    ellauri011.html on line 918: Meanwhile, she thought to herself: Hmmm, the others must have noticed that I feel different. What a wonderful thing it was, to be able to love. It's what makes us remember our mission on earth, our purpose in life. [A full page follows of this sort of dithyramb. Another solo aria starring Paulo.]
    ellauri011.html on line 943: In 2005, when he was already a world-famous writer, Paulo went to Amsterdam to give an important talk. On the morning o the talk, he was interviewed on one of Holland's principal TV shows at his old hostel - since converted to a hotel for nonsmokers, expensive and with a small and well-regarded high-end restaurant.
    ellauri011.html on line 947: He never again heard from Karla. He had a vague hope that Karla, knowing he was in the city [How? From TV of course! Everyone must have seen the show!] would show up to meet him. During the conference, he told part of the story found in this book. At a certain point, he couldn't help it and asked: Karla, are you here? No one raised a hand.
    ellauri011.html on line 988: Paulo sells his hippie youth for a second round.

    ellauri011.html on line 1039: Sentimentaalista soopaa seuraa, kani tunteilee kuin lähisukulaisensa rusakko (Julien kirjoittaja). Olis muka tärkeää tietää, oliko terroristeilla edes 0.1 sekunnin moment d´attendrissement ennenkuin ne lasautti perheen hengiltä. So what?
    ellauri011.html on line 1098: Tässä kohtaa on vähän leikinlaskua, menestynyt kani ei ole enää ihan yhtä vakavikko. Se sallii izelleen vähän vapauxia, pientä pilantekoa pyhistä asioista. Aika rennost noidat ja vainajat heittää läppää pahasta ja hyvästä, eikä kauheasti spennaa käykö lopultakaan oikein vaiko vasein. Kanille on joka tapauxessa käynyt hyvin.
    ellauri011.html on line 1109: Mut jepellähän ON mielestään hyvä selitys, jonka se sanoo seuraavassa suunavauxessa: vain jumala on hyvä. Eli jos mä oon hyvä, niinkuin sä osuvasti just sanoit, niin mä oon jumala. No tarkkaan ottaen oikeastaan mä oon vaan jahve junior, superman tattoon poika, mut mä ja mun iskä (ja pyhis kolmantena) ollaan tavallaan samixia. Vaikea selittää, mut niin se on. Ehkä jeppe sai tän idixen just tässä. Nerokasta. Samanlainen retorinen trikki oli sen "sinäpä sen sanoit", ylipapille ja juuttaalle. Niinpä. Leukavasti laukaistu. Se osas nää. Dialogipelimies.
    ellauri011.html on line 1169: Hymyillen salaa ähisten osaatte painia

    ellauri011.html on line 1332: The term public opinion was derived from the French opinion publique which was first used in 1588 by Michel de Montaigne in the second edition of his Essays (ch. XXII).
    ellauri011.html on line 1338: In his treatise An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, John Locke considered that man was subject to three laws: the divine law, the civil law and most importantly in Locke's judgement, the law of opinion or reputation.
    ellauri011.html on line 1342: In his 1672 essay On the Original and Nature of Government, William Temple gave an early formulation of the importance of public opinion. He observed that "when vast numbers of men submit their lives and fortunes absolutely to the will of one, it must be force of custom, or opinion which subjects power to authority".
    ellauri011.html on line 1346: An institution of central importance in the development of public opinion, was the coffee-house, which became widespread throughout Europe in the mid-17th century. Although Charles II later tried to suppress the London coffeehouses as "places where the disaffected met, and spread scandalous reports concerning the conduct of His Majesty and his Ministers", the public flocked to them.
    ellauri011.html on line 1375: The spell should break of this protracted dream.

    ellauri012.html on line 185: She whistles night and noon

    ellauri012.html on line 223: Aloin kelata koko juttua uudestaan, ja huomasin saman surun painavan kuin sillon kun jutut alko heittää häränpyllyä. Vaikka ajan olisi pitänyt parantaa haavat, riitti nähdä sun kuvaavan niitä kirjeessä, niin ne aukes ja alkoi vuotaa taas. Mikään ei voi pyyhkiä muistista mitä sä (sic) olet kärsinyt sun sepustusten tähden. En voi olla ajattelematta Aberikin ja Lotulfin pirullista kaunaa. Julma setä ja loukattu rakastaja on aina kipeinä mun silmissä. En koskaan unohda mitä vihollisia sun jutut ja mitä kateutta sun kunnia nostatti sua vastaan. En koskaan unohda miten sun maineen, jonka olit kyllä ansainnut, silppus ja räjäytti ilmaan valeuutiset. Eiks sun jumaluusoppi tuomittu poltettavaks? Eiks sua uhattu elinkautisella? Turhaan peruutit noi mielipiteet, mikään ei auttanut, päätettiin et sä olet vääräoppinen! Mistä noi kaks väärää todistajaa syytti sua Sensin kokouksessa? Mitä skandaaleja kaivettiin esiin Parakleteen, sun kappelin nimestä? Mikä myrsky syntyi munkkikoplan joukossa sua vastaan kun kutsuit niitä veljiksi? Tää meidän takaiskujen historia, jonka sä kerrot niin liikuttavasti, sai sydämeni vuotamaan verta. Mun kyynelet, joita en pysty estämään, on tuhrineet puolet kirjeestä; kunpa oiskin putsannet sen kokonaan, ja et mä oisin palauttanut sen sulle siinä kunnossa; sit olisin ollut tyytyväinen et förbin sen; mutta se otettiin multa pois liian pian.
    ellauri012.html on line 267: Voi surkeus! Onpa hullua selitellä näin. Täällä on vaan jumalankuvia, ja mä puhun vaan miehistä! Sä olit julma aihe tähän käytökselläs, senkin uskoton! Pitikö sun kerralla katkaista tää suhde! Mikset edes huijannut mua jonkin aikaa sen sijaan että heti hylkäsit? Olisit edes antanut jotain loppumerkkejä rakkaudesta, mä olisin kyllä uskonut ne. Mutta turhaan uskottelen itselleni että sä voisit olla uskollinen; sä et ole esittänyt mitään lieventäviä asianhaaroja. Mun oikeesti pitäis nähdä sut, mut jos se ei onnistu, tyydyn pariin riviin sulta postissa. Onko se nyt rakastavan niin vaikee kirjoittaa? En pyydä niitä sun opettavaisia kirjeitä, joilla tavoittelet mainetta; mä haluun vaan kirjeitä suoraan sydämestä, mitä käsi ei edes voi kirjoittaa kyllin nopeasti. Miksi petin itseäni toiveilla että sä olisit kokonaan mun, kun menin nunnaksi, ja lupasin elää niiden lakien mukaan? Siinä en oikeasti luvannut muuta kuin olla yksin sun, ja suostuin vankilaan jonka sä mulle määräsit. Vain kuolema saa mut pois tästä luostarista johon sä mut länttäsit; ja sit mun tuhat odottaa täällä sun tuhkia pölistäkseen vielä maassakin sun edessäs.
    ellauri012.html on line 301: Kyl rakkaus on sitten vittumainen homma! Ja kylläpä hyve on on arvokasta ihan omaa rauhaa ajatellen! Muista meidän intohimon hurjastelut, arvaa mun kauhistus; laske mukaan sun omat huoles, meidän ongelmat; heitä vaikka nää kaikki pois debetin puolelta ja ota krediittinä huomioon vaan rakkauden hellyys ja nautinto. Miten vähän siitä tulee! Ja kuitenkin me kaivataan noita varjomaisia alkuajan nautintoja niin sikana, ettei voida olla kirjoittamatta toisillemme, vaikka ollaan puettuna tuhkaan ja säkkikankaaseen. Me oltais hurjasti onnellisempia jos nöyristely ja kyynelehdintä takais pelastuksen. Nautinnonrakkautta ei saa juuritetuksi sielusta muuten kuin pinnistelemällä ihan raivona; sillä on niin kova puolustusasianajaja sydämessä, että meidän on vaikee siitä itseämme tuomita. Miten mä voin kauhistella syntejäni jos niiden kohde on mulle aina reilu? Miten mä voin erottaa rakastamastani henkilöstä vihattavan rakkauden? Riittääkö itkemäni kyynelet saamaan mut sitä vihaamaan? En tiedä miten mutta rakastetun itkeminen on aina jotenkin myös ihanaa. On vaikea erottaa surustamme katumuksen ja kaipuun osuuksia. Rikkeen ja rikoksen kohteen muistot on liian lähellä toisiaan. Ja rakkaus jumalaan ei tee tyhjäksi rakkautta sen luomaan.
    ellauri012.html on line 309: Sä pyydät mua palaamaan sun luo pyhistelyn tekosyyllä. Sun ponnekkuus tässä kohtaa herättää mussa epäilyksiä enkä tiedä mitä vastata. Jos teen tässä virheen, mun sanat punastuu, niin sanoakseni, sen jälkeen miten meille kävi. Kirkko on mustasukkainen kunniastaan, ja käskee että sen alamaiset koulutetaan hyveeseen hyveen avulla. Jos lähestymme jumalaa moitteetta, sitten voimme kutsua sinne mukaan muitakin. Mutta se mitä taivas odottaa Abelardilta on et se unohtaa Heloisen, ei tapaa sitä enää, ja se mitä se pyytää Heloiselta on olla odottamalta multa enää mitään, tyyten unohtaa koko jäbä. (Mistäkö mä sen tiedän? No mä oon apotti, mullon suora linja sinne, me jutellaan jahven kanssa päivittäin kuin mies miehelle.) Rakkauden ollessa kyseessä unohdus on välttämätön rangaistus, ja vaikein. On helppo luetella meidän vikoja; miten monet niistä on salaa tarjonneet lisää mielihyvää eikä tarvittavaa nöyryttä. Ainoo tapa palata herran helmaan on hylätä palvomamme luojanluoma, ja palvoa vaan unohtamaamme jumalaa. Tää voi kuulostaa kovalta, mut se meidän pitää tehdä pelastuksen eteen.
    ellauri012.html on line 315: Mutta olin yhä epäluuloinen. Luulin että naiset ei pysty pitämään lupauksia ellei niitä pakoteta siihen jollain valoilla. Vaadin noi valat, ja taivaan takuumieheksi, ettei mun tarvitsis enää epäillä. Kiitti teille pyhät paikat ja lujaseinäiset luostarit! ootte vapauttaneet mut tuhannesta huolesta. Uskonto ja hartaus pitää tarkkaa vartiota teidän muurien ja rautaristikoitten ympärillä. Tää on täyttä lepoa mustasukkaiselle mielelle! Miten kärsimättömästi mä siihen pyrinkään! Kuljin ympäri kuin jalopeura päivittäin kehottamassa sua tähän uhraukseen; mä ihailin (uskaltamatta mainita) sun kauneutta, ihankuin en oisi sitä ennen nähnytkään. Oliko se pyhistelyn aikaansaamaa kukintaa, vai mun suuren menetyksen kaikua, en välittänyt tutkia, kiirehdin vaan sun nunnavihkimystä. Lahjoin sun abbedissan rahalla että saisin oikeuden sit sut haudata. Talon papit oli myös lahjottu ja pidettiin poissa sun läheltä, vaikka murisivat. En unohtanut mitään, isoa enkä pientä asiaa, ja jos sä olisit päässyt mun kynsistä, mä en ois itsekään mennyt luostariin; olin päättänyt seurata sua kaikkialle. Mun varjoni ois seurannut sun askelia ja aina aiheuttanut sussa sekaannusta tai pelkoa, mistä mä itse oisin ilahtunut.
    ellauri012.html on line 317: Mut taivaan kiitos sä päätit ottaa valat. Mä seurasin sua alttarille, ja kun sä ojensit kätes koskettaakses pyhää rättiä mä kuulin sun pupeltavan noi kohtalokkaat sanat, jotka lopullisesti erotti sut miehistä. Siihen asti olin pelännyt että sun nuoruus ja kauneus voisi sotkea mun konseptit ja pakottaa sut palaa siviiliin. Eiks joku pieni houkutus ois voinut muuttaa sun mielen? Voiko hylätä lopullisesti itsensä vasta kakskytkaksivuotiaana? Voiko silloin, kun pitäis olla maksimi vapaa, ajatella ettei maailma tunnu miltään? Vähänpä mä tein sulle hallaa, ja pidin sua heikkona. Sä olit mun mielikuvituksessa kevytmielinen ja häilyvä. Voiko nainen, joka kuulee Sodoman liekit ja romahduksen, olla kääntämättä päätään sääliessään jotakuta? Katsoin sun silmiä, sun joka liikettä, sun ilmettä; kaikki vapisutti. Saatat pitää tämmöistä itsekästä toimintaa petoksena, julmuutena, murhana. Rakkaus joka muistuttaa noin paljon vihaa ei voi synnyttää muuta kuin halveksuntaa ja vihaa takaisin.
    ellauri012.html on line 321: Jos jumala puhuis sun sydämeen kuin nunnalle jonka viattomuus saa pyytämään jotain suosiota, mulla ois syytä lohtuun; mutta kun nään meidät molemmat rikollisen rakkauden uhreina, ja nään miten tää rakkaus loukkaa meidän vielä sileitä asepukuja ja lupauksia, se kauhistaa mua ihan sairaasti. Onko tää joku ehdonalainen? Vai krapulaa pitkästä maisen lemmen humalasta? Ei tiedä onko rakkaus myrkkyä ja huumausta ennenkuin saadaan armoa. Siihen saakka se on vain pahaa josta nautiskellaan. Kun ollaan erheessä, sen huomaaminen on eka askel parannukseen. Tiedetäänhän että jahve antaa meille anteeksi just siksi että ite loi meidät tälläsiksi paskoiksi. Kun se on osoittanut meille meidän mokan ja me ollaan voivoteltu sitä, se voi panna teräsvoimat liikkeelle ja auttaa meitä. Sun lohduksi voin kertoa et just näitä kiusauksia on kärsineet pyhimmistäkin pyhimmät pyhistelijät. Ollaan hyvässä seurassa.
    ellauri012.html on line 330: Toistonkin uhalla: mä olin sun mestari, nimittäin synnin koulussa. Sanoit mua isäksi, olinhan mä sitäkin. Mutta en vaadi sitä titteliä, koska tavallaan tapoin siinä taivaan isää. Mä oon sun veli, mut vaan synnissä. Mua sanotaan sun mieheksi, mutta vasta kun sä olit jo paksuna. Käytit aika paljon huonosti valittuja pyhistelysanoja musta sun kirjeessä, ihan omaks iloksesi, suttaa pois ne ja pane sijalle: murhaaja, roisto, vihollinen, joka teki parhaansa tuhotakseen sun kunnias, häiritäkses sun rauhaa, ja viedäkseen sulta neitsyyden. Mä olisin tappanutkin sut, mutta sä selvisit, kiitos jumalan haluttomuuden noudattaa mun neuvoja.
    ellauri012.html on line 383: Kun mä kerron mikä kilpailija on tempaissut mun sydämen pois sulta, kiität mun mielenmuutosta, ja pyydät tätä kilpailija liimaamaan sen kii. Tästä sä jo arvaat että jumalahan se on joka vie nyt sulta Heloisen. Jep, mun rakas Abelard, nyt se antaa mulle sen mielentyyneyden jonka meidän kurjuuden kirkas muisto ennen esti. Just taivas joo! mikä muu kilpailija vois ottaa sulta mut? Voisitko kuvitella, että joku vaan, joku ihminen voisi kumittaa sut mun sisältä? Voisitko kuvitella mun vaihtavan jumalisen ja sivistyneen Abelardin kehenkään alempaan kuin jumalaan? Ei, must tuntuu et sä olet arvioinut mut oikein tässä kohtaa. Varmaan sä haluut tietää millä keinoin jumala sai aikaan näin suuren muutoksen? Kerron sulle, että saisit ihmetellä sallimuksen salaisia kiemuroita. Muutama päivä sen jälkeen kun sun vika kirje tuli mä sairastuin vakavasti (Joopa joo, aina tää sama deus ex machina näissä muinaisjutuissa); lääkärit jo luovutti mut kuolemalle. Silloin mun tunne, joka aina ennen oli tuntunut musta viattomalta, alkoi näyttää pahalta. Muistista tulvahti kuin filmissä (joojoo, anakronismi, mutta siltä se varmaan just tuntui) kaikki mun elämän menneet teot, ja mun täytyy tunnustaa että ainoo tuska jonka tunsin oli tunnontuska meidän rakkaudesta. Kuolema jota olin siihen saakka katsonut vain etäältä, häälyi nyt mun edessä kuin syntisillä. Aloin pelätä jumalan kostoa nyt kun olin lähempänä sitä, ja mua kadutti etten mä ollut ottanut kunnolla käyttöön armolahjoja. Ne hellät kirjeet jotka sulle kirjoitin, rakkaat keskustelut joita kävin sun kanssa, kiusas mua nyt yhtä paljon kuin ne oli ennen viehättäny. Voi Heloise-repukka, mä sanoin, jos on rikos lähteä tolla lailla hehkuttamaan, ja jos tämän elämän jälkeen siitä seuraa varma rangaistus, mikset sä vastustanut kunnolla tollaisia kiusauksia? Ajattele mitä kidutuksia on sulle varalla, kauhistu sua venttaavia helevetin koneita, ja muista samalla nautintoja joita sun eksynyt sielu piti niin hitsin hienoina. Äh! eikö vähän harmita että kieriskelit niin falskeissa huveissa? Lyhyesti, Abelard, kuvittele katumusta jota tunsin, niin et ihmettele lehmänkäännöstä.
    ellauri012.html on line 387: Mut mut: mikä salainen huoli nyt nousee mun sieluun - mikä loppuun ajattelematon tunne nyt nousee joka vastustaa mun lupausta olla huokailematta Abelardin perään? Voi taivas! eks mä ookkaan päihittänyt mun rakkautta? Heloise sä onneton! niin kauan kun sulla henki pihisee sun pitää nähtävästi rakastaa Abelardia, niin on päätetty. Itke vaan kurja ämmä, sillä tätä parempaa tilaisuutta siihen tuskin tarjoutuu. Mun pitäis kuolla surusta; armo oli jo kerran ohittanut mut, ja sit mä lupasin olla sille uskollinen, mut nyt mä olen taas kerran pettänyt lupaukseni, ja armo on taas uhrattu Abelardille. Tää pyhäinhäväistys kyllä jo saa kupin kaatumaan. Miten mä voin tän jälkeen enää toivoa et jumala aukasee mulle aarrearkkunsa, sillä mä oon ihan väsyttänyt sen. Aloin loukata sitä heti ekasta hetkestä kun näin Abelardin; onneton sielun veljeys sai meidät ryhtymään luvattomiin panopuuhiin, ja jumala lähetti roiston erottamaan meidät puukolla. Mä valitan tätä onnettomutta, mutta jumaloin sen syytä. Aargh! mun pitäisi pitää tätä onnettomuutta taivaan lahjana, se ei hyväksynyt meidän liittoa ja erotti meidät, ja mun pitäisi pinnistää et saisin mun tunteen loppumaan. Eikö olis paljon parempi jos unohtaisin kokonaan sen kohteen, enkä jättäisi mieleeni mitään muistoa joka on fataali mun rauhalle ja pelastukselle? Herra varjele! pitääkö Abelardin kummitella mun ajatuksissa iän kaiken? Enksmä koskaan pääse vapaaksi lemmen kahleista? Mut ehkä mä pelkään ihan turhaan; ohjaahan hyve nyt kaikkia mun akteja ja ne on kaikki armon huostassa. Siis pelko pois, Abelard; ei mulla enää ole noita tunteita joiden kuvaaminen mun kirjeissä sai sut niin hermoksi. En mä enää yritä, kertomalla noista hyvistä hetkistä jotka rakkaus meille jakoi, herättää mitään syyllistä tunnetta jota sä voisit tuntea mua kohtaan. Mä vapautat sut kaikista sun valoista; unohda rakastajan ja aviomiehen tittelit ja jätä vaan toi iskä. Mä en odota sulta enää muuta kuin lempeitä nuhteita ja kirjeitä jotka pitää yllä rakkauden loimua. En vaadi sulta muuta kuin hengellistä neuvontaa ja terveellistä kuria.
    ellauri012.html on line 424: Alku on tietty aina vaikeaa, mutta lopussa luojan kiitos seisoo (siis ainakin jos on kassit). On hienoa rohkeasti aloittaa akti, ja kunnia kasvaa suhteessa siihen miten vaikeat on vastukset. Meidän pitäisi siis selvitä urheasti kaikista vastuksista jotka estää meitä kristillisten hyveitten käytössä. Luostarissa miehistä otetaan mittaa kuin kullista uuneissa. Kukaan ei kestä siellä kauaa ellei ne vedä kiltisti loordin iestä.
    ellauri012.html on line 436: Jumala ihan tosissaan tahtoo meidän selviävän, ja on tehnyt kaiken niin helpoksi kuin pystyy. Vanhassa sopimuksessa lukee taulukoissa mitä kaikkea se meiltä vaatii, ettei mene aikaa etsiessä oikeata pykälää. Uudessa sopimuksessa on poikkeuspykälä, jotta ei koskaan tartte ihan luovuttaa; ainahan voi tärpätä, armo käydä oikeudesta, kun osaa just oikeeseen aikaan kääntää kelkkansa. Eikä siinä kaikki! se on valinnut joukosta aina jotakin erityisen eteviä miehiä (juu, se sanoi kyllä meitä miehiä), jotka esimerkillään innostaa muita tekemään velvollisuutensa. Tähän hän on sittemmin valinnut myös muitakin ikään, sukupuoleen tai kuntoon katsomatta. Koita siis yhdistää persoonaasi kaikkien noiden esikuvien hyviä puolia. Ole puhdas kuin neitseet, ankara kuin ankoriitti, innokas kuin pastori tai piispa, ja sitkeä kuin halstarilla käristetty marttyyri. Ole eksakti kuin matemaatikko, täytä koko ikäsi kaikki pyhän ja valistuneen esimiehen vaatimukset, niin sitten kuolema, jota muut enimmäkseen kauhistelee, tuntuu susta ihan helpotukselta.
    ellauri012.html on line 440: Pyhimys joka on tottunut kumartamaan jumalalle kuolee ihan mielellään. Se odottaa iloisena (sanoo Tri Gregorios) tuomaria, joka varmasti antaa sille hyvät pisteet. Sitä ei pelota jättää tää kurja loukko ja mennä salin puolelle. Toisin on syntisellä, sanoo sama kirkkoiskä, se pelkää, ja syystä, se kauhistuu jo ekaa taudin oiretta; kuolema on sille kamalaa koska se pelkää pahan tuomitsijan tuloa; ja koska se on niin usein murjonut teidän armoanne, ei se nää mitään ulospääsyä kostotoimista.
    ellauri012.html on line 448: En edes kyseenalaista sitä Heloise, ettet sä ryhtyis tästä lähin ihan tosissaan hommaamaan tota pelastusta; tän pitäs olla sun ykkösasia. Hylkää mut siis lopullisesti sun sydämestä - tää on paras neuvo jonka mä kykenen sulle antamaan, sillä syyllisesti rakastetun persoonan muistelu ei voi kuin vahingoittaa taivasasiaa, miten pitkälle olisikin päästy hyveen tiellä. Kun olet saanut sammutetuksi sun epäterveen kiinnostuksen muhun, muiden hyveiden harjoitus käy helpoksi; ja kun lopulta sun koko elämä noudattaa kristillisiä sääntöjä, sä olet ihan kypsä heittämään jo lusikan nurkkaan. Sun sielu lehahtaa iloisesti ruumiista ja suuntaa lennon kohti taivasta. Siellä sä meet itsevarmana pelastusmiehistösi eteen, sulle ei lueta lakia tuomiolla, vaan kuulet kun pelastaja sanoo: tule mukaan, meillä on täällä tosi kivaa, soitellaan harpulla ja laulellaan virsiä, heitetään rengasta sädekehillä pilven päällä, ja muuta sellasta.
    ellauri012.html on line 470: Ahtaus ja näköalattomuus kait ahistaa.

    ellauri012.html on line 624: Après ces instructions, qui doivent tenir la première place, je crois qu’il n’est pas inutile de laisser aux filles, selon leurs loisirs et la portée de leur esprit, la lecture des livres profanes qui n’ont rien de dangereux pour les passions : c’est même le moyen de les dégoûter des comédies et des romans. Donnez-leur donc les histoires grecques et romaines ; elles y verront des prodiges de courage et de désintéressement. Ne leur laissez pas ignorer l’histoire de France, qui à aussi ses beautés ; mêlez celles des pays voisins, et les relations des pays éloignés judicieusement écrites. Tout cela sert à agrandir l’esprit, et à élever l’âme à de grands sentiments, pourvu qu’on évite la vanité et l’affectation.
    ellauri012.html on line 698: Ei osannut, joutui opettamaan, ajautui professorixi. Tykkäs ymmärtämisestä, muttei useampien kuin yhden opettamisesta kerrallaan. Kärsi Mauno Koiviston aikana, kantoi ovea, ristiinnaulittiin, kuoli ja haudattiin Kouvolan kieli-instituuttiin 15 vuodexi. Me töihis, me Kouvolaan. Ei jättänyt lomia pitämättä.
    ellauri012.html on line 820: Osa somalimiehistä haluaa hunnutetun puolison. Ne ovat parempia: tottelevaisempia, vaatimattomampia, ujompia, pystyvät kompromisseihin ja ovat neitsyitä. Tosin hunnun läpi ei näe muotoja, voi tulla pakettia avatessa pettymys. Niin kävi Jaakobille Lean kaa. Kääröstä ei tullutkaan Raakelia. Saakeli. Isolle Paulille ei tullut kauppakirppua. Sai mitä tilasi. Hyvännäköisen Lean lottaunivormussa. Saakeli, ajatteli Paulin kateet sisaret.
    ellauri014.html on line 36: Lainasin Pamela piukkapepun kirjastosta. Sen esipuhe oli paksulti alleviivattu ja merkitty huutomerkein. Joku on kai lukenut tän tenttiin - vittuako typeryxet alleviivaa kirjaston kirjoja? ei siitä ole mitään apua! Wäinö mainitsee siinä kiittävään sävyyn Paul Bourgetin. Ai kenet, kysyt ehkä, niin minäkin. Katsoin Wikipediasta. Wannabe-julkkistyrkky viisinkertainen melkein-nobelisti, agnostikko, joka palasi katoliseen uskoon romaanissa Le Disciple. Se oli Gladstonen mielikirjoja. Russell pelkäsi Gladstonea pikkupoikana. Ei varmaan ollut Russellin mieleinen kirja. Bourget oli ollut sielun hienoudessa edellä ihailijattariansa, Wäiskin mielestä. Samaa ei voinut sanoa Richardsonista, joka ainakin Fieldingin leirissä kuvattiin pieneksi, punakaksi, turhamaiseksi, arkipuheiseksi pikku mieheksi. Tuntuuko jo pientä narsistisen setämiehen hajua? - Asiasta 3:nteen, kuppainen Kasimir Leino kirjoitti historia2.htm#runo260">kalikkarunon Gladstonen kunniaxi, verraten sen Irlannin kohtelua suomen sortoaikaan.Sellainen HINOA JOHN -vittuilu Paulille tussilla Johnin oveen. No Pohjois-Irlannin Karjalaa ei sentään antanut Gladstone takaisin. Sattui silmiin, kun koitin löytää tietoa Kasimirin kupasta.
    ellauri014.html on line 83: Locke addressed the concept of supply and demand as part of a discussion about interest rates in 17th-century England. The phrase "supply and demand" was first used by James Denham-Steuart in his Inquiry into the Principles of Political Economy, published in 1767. Adam Smith used the phrase in his 1776 book The Wealth of Nations.
    ellauri014.html on line 89: Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded is an epistolary novel by English writer Samuel Richardson, a novel which was first published in 1740. It tells the story of a 16-year-old maidservant named Pamela Andrews, whose employer, Mr. B, a wealthy landowner, makes unwanted and inappropriate advances towards her after the death of his mother. Pamela strives to reconcile her strong religious training with her desire for the approval of her employer in a series of letters and, later, journal entries, addressed to her impoverished parents. After various unsuccessful attempts at seduction, a series of sexual assaults, and an extended period of kidnapping, the rakish Mr. B eventually reforms and makes Pamela a sincere proposal of marriage. In the novel's second part, Pamela marries Mr. B and tries to acclimatize to her new position in upper-class society. The full title, Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded, makes plain Richardson's moral purpose. A best-seller of its time, Pamela was widely read but was also criticized for its perceived licentiousness and disregard for class barriers.
    ellauri014.html on line 125: Ihan sama meininki on apinoilla, koirilla ja kanoilla. Se on se nokintajärjestys. Huvittavinta lähes on, että Richardson meni myöhemmissä painoxissa muuttamaan Pamelan vanhemmat köyhistä ojankaivajista köyhtyneeksi herrasväexi ja korjasi Pamelan työläispuheita fiinimmixi, jotta epäsäätyinen avioliittoskandaali ei olisi niin vaarallisen näköinen. Voi hemmetti! Kyllä on nää apinat sitten naurettavia! Kanavanhuxetkin on herttaisempia.
    ellauri014.html on line 388: No tätä ongelmaa ei oo etäpesäkettä lainaavalla Juulialla ja sen yhtä monisanaisella Roomeolla. Voi hokee tota lausetta yhtä monta kertaa kuin oopperan nk. lihava nainen, ja kyl ne hokeekin. Erityisherkkyys on tosi fataali lahjakkuuden laji, Rousseau toteaa. Lo siento, sanoi humalainen hississä kun housut putosi.
    ellauri014.html on line 471: Toka tuotantokausi alkaa kotiopen aika masixella kirjeellä. Jatkossa Claire ja loordi kertoo millasta pillastusta on Pröön ekat viikot ilman Juuliaa. Ei hätää, loordilla on paljon kokemusta miehistä ja niiden kanssa olosta, eiköhän me kahteen pekkaan tästä selvitä.
    ellauri014.html on line 488: Kinsellan rikas vanhempi mies oli kiltti, vähän liiankin, ei pannut kampoihin paskamaiselle anopille. Jätti himoshoppaajan itse kaikki tekemään. Varo sitä! Muista katsastaa lähisuku huolella! Muuten voi miniän liian pienet korvat kaataa koko homman.
    ellauri014.html on line 666: Mihis tässä sijoittuu izemurha? Pröö väittää että raamattu ei ota kantaa, izensä nirhaamisen kielto on kirkkoiskäraadin lisäys. Stoalaisia se ei vaivannut.
    ellauri014.html on line 680:

    Esimerkkejä hölmöistä izemurhista


    ellauri014.html on line 689: Toinen esimerkki turhista izemurhista oli norjalaisen kenraali Fleischerin tapaus. Se vaan kärmistyi kun ei päässyt karkuunlähteneiden norjalaisten keulamiehexi, vaan lähetettiin jonnekin peräpöhkölään kouluttajaxi. Harmitti ja hävetti niin hiivatusti. Et ei kun leukakiikkuun vaan. No kyllä mullakin se ajatus kävi mielessä useamminkin kuin kerran Kouvolan reissuilla. Kymijoen sillalla, ja siinä isossa kallioleikkauxessa Porvoon lähellä. Tosta kun kääntäis rattia niin se olis siinä. En sitten kääntänyt.
    ellauri014.html on line 757: Ted palaa meriltä toivottavasti miehistyneenä tai ainakin ahavoituneena. Rusakko joka ei kai ize ole käynyt Englantia pitemmällä, kertoo kauheita silminnäkijän kertomuxia maan ääristä, kuvaa kolonialismin hirmutöitä, mut päästää joukkoon izekin rasistista textiä. Eritoten sättii kiinalaisia. Varmaan ovelasti petkuttaneet Rusoota porsliinikaupassa, myöneet kenties potan ming-vaasina. Orjakauppiaat on pahoja, britit hyviä. Höh, samaa porukkaa, olihan briteilläkin kaikkialla orjia, ja jenkeillä. Sit vasta lopettivat kun eivät enää tarvinneet, teollisuustyöläiset tuli halvemmaxi. Britti ei pelkää muuta kuin nälkää ja ikävystymistä. Semmoinen oli varmaan Rusoo izekin, ainakin se luuli niin, oli aina aatelisten ruokapöydässä ensimmäisenä. Vaikka pelkäsi se myös Mamania.
    ellauri014.html on line 812: Nyt ollaan puolin ja toisin tosi kunnollisia. Wolmarit esittelee laajalti englantilaistyylistä puutarhaansa, eli Russu esittelee tässä pahvikuviensa suulla luontoideoita lukijoille. Viherrakentaminen on Rusoon/Julkun hobby. Eikä se ole ollenkaan pois kotitöistä, sanoo Wolle ylpeänä, Julle tekee sitä vaan ja ainoastaan vapaa-ajalla. Ei vaitiskaan, kyllä Wolle jelppii vähän ehtiessään. Aika hoitamaton pöheikkö se onkin. Mut se on just koko idea, muistuttavat kuokkijat. Rauhismaiseen tunnelmaan tässä pyritään, ei itänaapureiden barokkipuistolookiin.
    ellauri014.html on line 834: Kimmo-doppelgänger Wollen taivaanisämäinen vittuilu vaan pahenee, koettelee vaan ei hylkää herra. Se lähtee käymään paronien linnaan viikoksi, jättää heilat omiin hoteisiina, uhittele niitä, ettehän nyt te hyvixet toki ala sillä aikaa nussimaan! vähän kyllä uhkaileekin lähtiessään. Haukkaakohan ne paratiisiomenaa, ja potkiikohan jehova ne sitten pihalle? Toistaakohan raamatun historia izeään, jää lukijamme jännäämään.
    ellauri014.html on line 860: Viides tuotantokausi. Ted on nyt kolmekymmentä, serkukset vanhanpiian iässä, mutta onnex rouvia. Ralph on matkalla Namulandiaan. Ralph moittii Tediä pehmyexi, sen pitäis olla kovana kuin porkkana, ja yhtä tarkkana. Se kirjoittaa Tedille: nyt on korkea aika sun miehistyä ja mennä izeesi (ei Julkkuun eikä edes muhun), kert et Julkun mekon alle pääse millään ilveellä. Peukaloliisan ohje: "seuraa sydäntäs vaan!" toimii ainoastaan jos sydän ei ole ihan bäng bäng typerä. Kuten sulla, on pakko sanoa.
    ellauri014.html on line 867: Vekkulisti Ted ylistää Jullen arkea ja toisesta suupielestä surkuttelee sitä. Samat jutut jotka tekee tästä äiti Teresasta onnenmyyrän, sais kenet tahansa muun menettämään hermonsa. Suloinen rauhan tyyssija oisi nukkavieru rauhis. Tyyni elämä ois kuolettavan tylsää. Seesteinen perhearki pelkkää kotiorjan raatamista kiljuvien lasten parissa. Maalaisympäristössä on yhtä jännää kuin Sysmän liikekeskustassa marraskuussa. Viisas aviosiippa ois sietämätön besserwisseri ja kylmiö. Normaali ihminen joutuis suunniltaan ja lähtis litomaan. Mut Julia ei olekaan täysin normaali. Muumeja on sillä kyllä laaksossa, muttei täysi määrä, ja matot ullakolla aika rytyssä.
    ellauri014.html on line 959: Kreikan ja rooman uskoiset erottaa filioque lauseke, eli onx pyhä henki vaan faijan erite, vai onko pojalla myös lusikkansa siinä sopassa. Ortodoxit on vanhalla kannalla, pyhis on ruikittu vaan isän kupeista, siitähän se poika synnittä sit sikisi. Ei siihen poikaa pidä sekottaa. Tää filioque on kyl pelkkä punainen silakka, monet paavitkin on olleet siitä jälkikäteen vähän häpeissään.
    ellauri014.html on line 1029: Markiisitar on niin pahoillaan loordin naimapuuhista että sairastuu raivosta ja kuolee sopivasti. Se oli sen loppu, ajattelee Loordi pakana. Hard rock hallelujah.
    ellauri014.html on line 1123: Tästä etiäppäin loppun saakka Pröön kirje lähtee ihan longiksi, se on vaan Rusoon oman "filosofian" pyöritystä. 1700-luvun moralisointia, teollistuvan yhteiskunnan johtoportaan angstia, että mikä olis paras peitetarina. Mikä satu ize uskoa, mitä pajunköyttä uskotella alamaisille. Vähän sellasta Benthamin ja Millin tyylistä utilitarismia: mikähän vaihtoehtoinen totuus toimis parhaiten. Meemiteollisuuden höyrykoneet yskähtelee käyntiin. Nykyisin ne hyrrää ihan täysiä. Vaihtoehdot löytyy kaikki netistä. Siellä luuraa kaikki pilven päällä kyylääjät, ihmisten phishaajat.
    ellauri014.html on line 1137: Kirjeet sinkoilevat nahistelun merkeissä. Oravat puhuvat nyt ristiin, Rusakko kommentoi itseään alaviitteessä. Ted ei haluu vaihtaa kakkosruutuun, ettei paalupaikka mene kakkosreijältä. Mieluiten se pitää molempia misukoita varalla. Voihan Wolle liukastua banaaninkuoreen milloin tahansa. Se hyvä puoli oli ennen, kuin ei ollut antibiootteja. Ei pillereitä, kapseleita eikä tabletteja. Vain ruiskeita joita iso Pauli tarjos Lealle. Takaisin luontoon sanon minä. Julle hoveineen lähtee järvenrantaretkelle chillailemaan Chilloniin, jossa kalsa kylpy chillaa Jullen kalmaxi.
    ellauri014.html on line 1401: This is what you should do

    ellauri014.html on line 1500: Milton had a loving relationship with Charles Diodati. This is recorded in the letters they wrote to each other.
    ellauri014.html on line 1511: But an air of mystery surrounds Marino´s life, especially the various times he spent in prison; one of the arrests was due to procuring an abortion for a certain Antonella Testa, daughter of the mayor of Naples, but whether she was pregnant by Marino or one of his friends is unknown; the second conviction (for which he risked a capital sentence) was due to the poet´s forging episcopal bulls in order to save a friend who had been involved in a duel.
    ellauri014.html on line 1512: He remained the reference point for Baroque poetry as long as it was in vogue. In the 18th and 19th centuries, while being remembered for historical reasons, he was regarded as the source and exemplar of Baroque "bad taste".
    ellauri014.html on line 1524: The two poets had their duel on the Chernaya Rechka using Pushkin-era pistols. On his way to the venue, Voloshin lost one of his galoshes and declared that he would not leave the spot until he found it. The galosh was found, Gumilyov fired his pistol first and missed, while Voloshin’s pistol misfired twice. The two poets patched up relations only 12 years later.
    ellauri014.html on line 1557: ... But more importantly, these surroundings put Marino in direct contact with the natural philosophy of Della Porta and the philosophical systems of Giordano Bruno and Tommaso Campanella. While Campanella himself was to oppose "Marinism" (though not attacking it directly), this common speculative background should be borne in mind with its important pantheistic (and thus neo-pagan and heterodox) implications, to which Marino would remain true all his life and exploit in his poetry, obtaining great success amongst some of the most conformist thinkers on the one hand while encountering continual difficulties because of the intellectual content of his work on the other.
    ellauri014.html on line 1569: The Cambridge History of Italian Literature thought him to be "one of the greatest Italian poets of all time". He is considered the founder of the school of Marinism, later known as Secentismo (17th century) or Marinismo (19th century), characterised by its use of extravagant and excessive conceits.[2] Marino´s conception of poetry, which exaggerated the artificiality of Mannerism, was based on an extensive use of antithesis and a whole range of wordplay, on lavish descriptions and a sensuous musicality of the verse, and enjoyed immense success in his time, comparable to that of Petrarch before him.
    ellauri014.html on line 1572: He was widely imitated in Italy, France (where he was the idol of members of the précieux school, such as Georges Scudéry, and the so-called libertins such as Tristan l´Hermite), Spain (where his greatest admirer was Lope de Vega) and other Catholic countries, including Portugal and Poland, as well as Germany, where his closest follower was Christian Hoffmann von Hoffmannswaldau and Holland where Constantijn Huygens was a great admirer. In England he was admired by John Milton and translated by Richard Crashaw.
    ellauri014.html on line 1584: But some witnesses, who include both Marino´s detractors (such as Tommaso Stigliani) and defenders (such as the printer and biographer Antonio Bulifoni in a life of the poet which appeared in 1699) have firmly asserted that Marino, much of whose love poetry is heavily ambiguous, had homosexual tendencies. Elsewhere, the reticence of the sources on this subject is obviously due to the persecutions to which "sodomitical practices" were particularly subject during the Counterreformation.
    ellauri014.html on line 1607: Marino originated a new, "soft, graceful and attractive" style for a new public, distancing himself from Torquato Tasso and Renaissance Petrarchism as well as any kind of Aristotelian rule.
    ellauri014.html on line 1621: In Adone, Marino quotes and rewrites passages from Dante´s Divine Comedy, Ariosto, Tasso and the French literature of the day. The aim of these borrowings is not plagiarism but rather to introduce an erudite game with the reader who must recognise the sources and appreciate the results of the revision. Marino challenges the reader to pick up on the quotations and to enjoy the way in which the material has been reworked, as part of a conception of poetic creation in which everything in the world (including the literature of the past) can become the object of new poetry. In this way, Marino also turns Adone into a kind of poetic encyclopaedia, which collects and modernises all the previous productions of human genius.
    ellauri014.html on line 1643: ... interesting and ingenious burlesque compositions such as La Murtoleide (81 satirical sonnets against Gaspare Murtola), the "capitolo" Lo stivale; Il Pupulo alla Pupula (burlesque letters) etc. Many works were announced but never written, including the long poem Le trasformazioni, inspired by Ovid´s Metamorphoses, which was abandoned after Marino turned his attention to Adone.
    ellauri014.html on line 1679: Emily of New Moon. universally recognized as the book that most encoded her personality, contains one poem, or a part of a poem, also found in Montgomery’s memoir of the craft, originally published as a serial in a Canadian magazine in 1917 and later published as The Alpine Path in 1974. In Emily of New Moon the poem is sent to Emily by Jarback (Pönttöselkä) Priest as a selection from “The Fringed Gentian,” and includes this stanza:
    ellauri014.html on line 1682: Then whisper, blossom, in thy sleep Kuiskaa mulle unieni sinikukka:
    ellauri014.html on line 1708: The aged year is near his end. lupaa ikääntyneen vuoden loppua.
    ellauri014.html on line 1722: So, yeah (the blogger goes on), I know I am not an internationally renowned poetry critic, but it strikes me that this is an entirely different poem. There is a blossom in both poems, and a journey. But there isn’t much else that connects them. I don’t think I am being overly literal when I suggest that either Montgomery has misattributed the original poem, or that her version is a pretty radical interpretation.
    ellauri014.html on line 1760: When whisper blossom in thy sleep Kuiskaa mulle unieni sinikukka:
    ellauri014.html on line 1770: Like Bryant’s poem, this verse is about autumnal flowers. With some searching I found this poem in the 1884 New Year’s edition of Godey’s Lady’s Book. “Tam! The Story of a Woman” by Ella Rodman Church and August De Bubna includes this poem. In the story the verses are found in a copy of Bryant’s poetry–hence Montgomery’s connection to the poem–but in the (relatively boring) story they are actually written on a slip of paper that was found in the Bryant book–and written by a woman who tentatively hopes to make a career as a poet in a male’s publishing world. Intriguingly, Montgomery seems to have forgotten the original context of the verse, but herself emulated the desire of “Miss Powell” in the story.
    ellauri014.html on line 1772: It seems to me that Montgomery selects out the best bit of the poem, but again you see my bias. I am that “blossom,” I hope–but if all four verses are included it becomes rather silly to press the metaphor. Still, I think Montgomery was on the right track with her idea of “The Alpine Path.” It is a peculiar provenance that brings us this poem, but it has been an interesting journey. Once I found the names of Ella Rodman Church and August De Bubna I found that others have followed my path of curiosity. The Confederation Centre of the Arts in Charlottetown has some of L.M. Montgomery’s scrapbooks, including her copy of the poem. But the search has been interesting, nonetheless.
    ellauri014.html on line 1774: Update: A reader sent in this note: A Carol Gaboury, a member of the literary society until her death in 1998, identified this information about the poem, The Fringed Gentian from the Winter 1989 issue of Kindred Spirits Newsletter of Vermont. See the note in The L.M. Montgomery Literary Society.
    ellauri014.html on line 1799: A various language; for his gayer hours
    ellauri014.html on line 1802: Into his darker musings, with a mild
    ellauri014.html on line 1815: In all his course; nor yet in the cold ground,
    ellauri014.html on line 1825: Turns with his share, and treads upon. The oak
    ellauri014.html on line 1826: Shall send his roots abroad, and pierce thy mould.
    ellauri014.html on line 1850: Save his own dashings—yet the dead are there:
    ellauri014.html on line 1874: Scourged to his dungeon, but, sustained and soothed
    ellauri014.html on line 1876: Like one who wraps the drapery of his couch
    ellauri014.html on line 1973: "Thanatopsis" remains a milestone in American literary history. "Poems" was considered by many to be the first major book of American poetry. Nevertheless, over five years, it earned Bryant only $14.92. Poet and literary critic Thomas Holley Chivers, who often accused other writers of stealing poems, said that the only thing Bryant "ever wrote that may be called Poetry is ´Thanatopsis´, which he stole line for line from the Spanish."
    ellauri014.html on line 1993: Sen luoja Tuomas Kyrö on pystyynnostettu pikku sika. Tai paremminkin Pahoittajan tuhannetta tulemista odottava, Anti-Klischtusta kammoava apostoli Vihannes, nahistunut porkkana, Paatoksen potka, jolta vaan tulee näitä ilmestymiskirjoja jatkuvalla syötöllä.
    ellauri015.html on line 468: Unkarilainen leffaohjaaja Peter Medak purkaa sydäntään dokkarissa, jossa se kertoo, miten sen juutalainen perhe kärsi Unkarissa ensin Eichmannin alla, sitten Stalinin. Se itse kärsi pähkähullun vaaleenpunaisen pantterin, Peter Sellersin oikkuja. Peterkin oli jutku. Koira puri koiraa. Pitkä laiha lysähtänyt muotifyysikko Syxy Räsänen rähisee palestiinalaisten rättipäiden julmasta kohtelusta GT-sählämien taholta. Mitä tästä opimme? Rodulla ei ole mitään tekemistä pahuuden kanssa, kaikki ollaan samaa julmaa lajia. Koirat ei ole rasisteja, ne haukkuu tasapuolisesti kaikki toisiansa aidan takana. Läheltä haistellen ne on höveleitä vastakkaiselle sukupuolelle.
    ellauri015.html on line 482: Pirkko Carlson (Fiskarsin historiikki)

    ellauri015.html on line 502: Ei vielä vaivasten valtakunnassa. Klassikkona suhisee.
    ellauri015.html on line 575: päästä aika vähissä.

    ellauri015.html on line 695: Un célèbre Académicien a déjà tenté cette expérience , & j'ai lieu de croire que la répétant & opérant avec tout le soin qu'elle exige, nos résultats seront à-peu-près les mêmes. — (Résultat des Expériences & Observations de MM. De Ch… & Cl… sur l'Acier fondu, dans le Journal de physique, de chimie, d'histoire naturelle et des arts, juillet 1788, , vol.33, p.46)
    ellauri015.html on line 745: Rami on lyhyenläntä pyylevä pyknikko, vaimo Pia on ex-koripallisti, Korbballspielerin. Antoi Ramille pesää, eikä kosijalle ojentanut koria. Koivun latvassa korkealla Piukulla on pesä, Jouzan Koivuniemessä. Rami ulottuu Piaa juuri ja juuri isokainaloon. Pöntön oloinen on Rami, persumies, tykkää härkätaistelusta ja muusta joukkourheilusta. Muutenkin on tollo, kulttuurihistorian saralta tohtorixi väitellyt, vieläpä Bakhtinista. QED, I rest my case. Tykkääköhän se mezästyksestäkin? No ainaskin puhuuu kalastuxesta, ja ryhmäsexistä sekasaunassa, muistelee autuaana kuinka vaihto-opiskelijana nuoleskeli kaveriaan Sveniä saunanlauteilla jostain aukosta. Maistui savulta.
    ellauri015.html on line 750: Tää Rami muistuttaa aamu-uutisten venäläistä sotahistorian dosenttia Pietarin valtionyliopistosta, joka koitti hukuttautua Napoleonin asussa, kun ei saanut hukutettua tappamiensa opiskelijoiden ruumiinosia. Kylmettyi vain Neva-joessa, sai hypotermiaa. Ihan kuin Eilenberger mökillä saunan jälkeen uimassa. Haalea menijä, vai mikä se nyt oli. Romaanit häviää klikkiuutisille kuin ankat.
    ellauri015.html on line 761: Moment mal! Mihis kirkkoa ja rukouxia sit tarvitaan? Tai pastoria? Huono virsivalinta. Mieluummin vaikka biafran kansallishymni. Siihen päädytään, tai naiset päätyy, sakulta ei kysytä. Se jää pettyneenä pyörittämään peukaloita ja kuuntelee lisää Old Nick Cavea, toista luolamiestä, yhtä sammahtanutta kasaritähteä.
    ellauri015.html on line 775: Voin uskoa, että Wokulla oli samantapaisia kulttuurishokkeja tänne tullessa kuin Ramilla. Lea ei puhunut saksaa, mutta halusi silti viestittää kaikenlaista saksalaiselle vävylle, onnexi Lea oli nopea puhuja ja hyvä näyttelijä, ja Rikulasta tuli kääntäjä. Pauli ei uskonut että sakemanni saisi saunaan tulta, niin herrakansaa kuin onkin, ja tunaroi pitkän tovin sille mallixi. Kostoxi Woku vinoili sen pikku korjauxille kuuden tuuman nauloilla. Ehkä Woku näki samantapaisia painajaisia kuin Rami (ks. alempana). Oudoista lankomiehistä hiirenkorvat päässä jotka sanoo: Ich bin eine Ratte.
    ellauri015.html on line 831: Eilenbergerin kirja on pannukakku, sanoisi Oiva Ketonen jos eläisi. Jälkijättöinen asiantuntematon räpellys Benjaminista, Cassirerista , Wittgensteinista ja Heideggeristä, viime vuosisadan alun nimettömistä mitättömyyxistä plus Ludista, joka sekin kyllä on pahasti ylimainostettu. Reportteriluuskan kolmannen käden turaus siitä on vielä asiantuntemattomampi ja vetelämpi. Lämmitetään ikivanhaa viime vuosituhantista kinaa analyyttisten anglosaxien ja niitäkin anaalisempien sakemannifilosofien välillä. Oisko siinä vähän revanssin makua, sakemanni kaivautumassa esiin pommikuopista. Tästä mannerlaattojen välisestä railosta on nyt muutenkin tullut luetux vuosikymmeniä vanhoja historiikkeja, Eskin ja Maken pamflettien muodossa. ilmeisesti tääkin riita pitää lämmittää joka 20s vuosi kuin joku roiskeläppävalmispizza mikroaaltouunissa.
    ellauri015.html on line 842: Airot vääntyy luokille, kokka kohisee. Enpä ole ennen nähnyt soutuvenettä joka nousee plaaniin. Taisi tulla Päijänne-soudun pikamatkan ennätys.
    ellauri015.html on line 852: Wolfram Roth on kaikkien lähipiirin setämiesten kauhistus. Wolfram toimii isänä ja äitinä, ei vaan huolla autoa ja vaihda lamppuja kuten muut isät, vaan hoitaa kodin, ruuan, lapset, vaimon, mökin, kaikki salkut on sillä paitsi pääministerin ja ulkoministerin. Korjaa kaiken, käy kaupassa, leikkaa hehtaarinkokoisen nurmikon heti mökille tultua itse säätämällään päältäajettavalla leikkurilla, kulkee rytkyissä sähkötyökalu kädessä, rakentaa kellarin, verannan ja mökin, paperoi seinät, ohjaa kaikkia ammattimiehiä ja korjaa niiden jälkiä, neuvoo poikia, tekee susheja ja leipoo kakkuja (onneksi likilaskuisia). Käy kaikesta tästä huolimatta joka päivä töissä polkupyörällä, tekee pitkää päivää ja tuo kotiin paljon pekonia, hankkii vielä lisätienestejä takapäivystäjänä kesälomalla. Mutta muistaa töiden jälkeen palata nopeasti kotiin. Istuu uupuneena kuistin pallille ja kysyy Riitalta: käynkö kaupassa vai imuroinko ensin?
    ellauri015.html on line 971: Lähisuvussa on yksi Wilfrid ja kaksi Siiriä.

    ellauri016.html on line 110: Kaikki mitä Polle kauhistelee vanhanaikaisena hölmöytenä

    ellauri016.html on line 169: Ingmanien perilliset kazoi päältä huuli pyöreenä. Titaaninkokoinen Olli Kilpi jättiläis(kumi?)tyttärineen kantoi ulos vähin äänin kahteen pekkaan kantohihnoilla Strengnäsin tuomiorovastilta kuittaamansa chiffonnieerin. Samaan aikaan neljä pikkuruista Carlson-agenttia, hälisten kuin nippu neekereitä kuorma-auton lavalla, kuskas ulos Tutun hirmu suurta astiakaappia. Pikku Tiina kulki hississä kaksinkerroin kaapin päällä lisäpainona, ei vaitiskaan, vaan painamassa nappulaa kuin Michael Jackson.
    ellauri016.html on line 177: kuin Arvo Ylpön koe-eläin työhuoneen siivoojan kauhistuxena.

    ellauri016.html on line 258: In ppp data, Qatar, Macao SAR, Luxembourg and Singapore would have gdp per capita of above one lakh International dollar. Singapore is the latest entrant in this list. There would be 24 economies which have per capita income above Int. $50,000. 77 economies would have per capita income greater than world's average. Four economies would be above five times richer than the world. The 12 poorest would be poorer by more than ten times.
    ellauri016.html on line 511: Silti tää urbo versio on liian sisäistetty herruus tyyppinen. Snobi on ylpeilevä pahis ja sen kadehtija nöyrä hyvis. Ihan kun mauttomasta joteski objektiivisesti puuttuis mausteita. Tavixen omakehunhajuinen käsitys. Ns. paremmuudessa on kyse vaan nokintakisan juoxuhaudoista. Snobin kadehtijaa vituttaa kun snobi pöyhkeilee ja keulii edelle. Itelle ei jää muuta kuin olla moraalisesti parempi. Niinkuin lyhyt Kimmo Koskenniemi koripallossa, noudattaa sääntöjä.
    ellauri016.html on line 519: Snobin lanseeasi lempparini Thackeray Punchissa 1846. Se sanoi izeäänkin snobixi. Snobi oli selkeästi sellanen sosiaaliprkyri,joka pyrki esiintymään hienompana kuin olikaan. Siis streeberi ensin, sitten pröystäilijä, pöyhkeily tulee kiipimisen peräaaltona, kun ohitellaan ruvumpaa sakkia.
    ellauri016.html on line 543: Lupaavasta tutkijasta tulee snobi jos se alkaa esiintyä telkkarissa jokapaikan dosenttina ja pelleilee pellepuvussa linnan juhlissa tai nenäpäivänä muiden turhis julkkisten kanssa lehtikuvassa. Mainizematta nyt mitään nimiä, kuten E. Saarinen. Vitun Hyvinkään kultahattu. Kolmantena jonossa hiihtää maisteri Lauri Carlson Helsingistä.
    ellauri016.html on line 774: Drake's reluctance to perform live or be interviewed contributed to his lack of commercial success. He suffered from depression and insomnia, topics often reflected in his lyrics. After completing Pink Moon in 1972, he withdrew from live performance and recording, retreating to his parents' home in rural Warwickshire. On 25 November 1974, at the age of 26, Drake died from an overdose of amitriptyline, a prescribed antidepressant.
    ellauri016.html on line 776: Nick Drake received little critical success during his lifetime, but has since been widely acclaimed. Based on professional rankings of his albums and songs, the aggregate website Acclaimed Music lists him as the 101st most acclaimed recording artist in history.
    ellauri016.html on line 780: In 1999, "Pink Moon" was used in a Volkswagen commercial, boosting Drake's US album sales from about 6,000 copies in 1999 to 74,000 in 2000. The LA Times saw it as an example of how, following the consolidation of US radio stations, previously unknown music was finding audiences through advertising. Fans used the filesharing software Napster to circulate digital copies of Drake's music; according to the Atlantic, "The chronic shyness and mental illness that made it hard for Drake to compete with 1970s showmen like Elton John and David Bowie didn't matter when his songs were being pulled one by one out of the ether and played late at night in a dorm room." In November 2014, Gabrielle Drake published a biography of her brother. Over the following years, Drake's songs appeared in soundtracks of "quirky, youthful" films such as The Royal Tenenbaums, Serendipity and Garden State. Made to Love Magic, an album of outtakes and remixes released by Island Records in 2004, far exceeded Drake's lifetime sales. In 2017, Kele Okereke cited Pink Moon as an influence on his third solo album Fatherland. Other contemporary artists influenced by Drake include José González, Bon Iver, Iron & Wine, Alexi Murdoch and Philip Selway of Radiohead.
    ellauri016.html on line 782: Drake recorded his debut album Five Leaves Left later in 1968, with Boyd as producer. He had to skip lectures to travel by train to the sessions in Sound Techniques studio, London. Inspired by John Simon's production of Leonard Cohen's 1967 album Songs of Leonard Cohen, Boyd was keen to record Drake's voice in a similar close and intimate style, "with no shiny pop reverb". He sought to include a string arrangement similar to Simon's, "without overwhelming or sounding cheesy".
    ellauri016.html on line 882: Tää on odotettu jatko-osa menestyskirjaan Piilottajan päiväkirja 2010, missä Juhis kertoo miten se piilotteli afgaanipakolaista vaarivainajansa lukaalissa. Siinä oli "keski-ikäinen kirkosta eronnut professori jokseenkin rähmällään elämän perimmäisten kysymysten äärellä".
    ellauri016.html on line 886: Piilottajan sequel on enempi sivustakatsomista, tutkimusapulainen on haastatellut anonyymin vastaanottokeskuksen nimeltä Mäntylä nimeltä mainizemattomia esimerkkimamuja, ja Juhis tekee siitä poliittista yhteenvetoa. Ei yhtä vetävä, vähemmän human interestiä, six varmaan löytyi poistolaatikosta. Se et mamujen nimet muutetaan kertoo jo paljon. Ei nää ole yxilöitä, nää on tyyppejä. Suspekteja tyyppejä.
    ellauri016.html on line 888: Juhis lainaa Rancièrea, jonka kirjoituxissa sen mielestä on jujua. Rancière toteaa, että valtioilla ei ole enää muuta virkaa kuin paimentaa kansalaisia. Pääoman liikkeistä ne on jo aivan ulkona. Tarkemmin sanoen, valtiot tuottavat ja hallinnoivat turvattomuutta.
    ellauri016.html on line 910: Tää on pahaa lääkettä, totee Juhis. Näin syntyy vaan turhautuneita kiivailijoita, ei passivoituneita alamaisia, kunnon kantasuomalaisia. Tollasia hätäisiä sandaaleissa läpyttäjiä, ei saapasjalkaisia kanta-astujia. Kotoutus kusee nilkoille. Resurssikysymys, tarvitaan enemmän työntekijöitä. Mut ne maxavat. Kärsii tuottavuus. Kaiken takana on raha. Ollaan huutolaisia kuin lapsoset ja vanhuxet, mennään vähiten pyytävälle vaivoixi.
    ellauri016.html on line 1076: Amerikka on mahdollisuuxien maa. Siellä on mahdollista, ja tapahtuikin juuri Utahissa, et äitipuoli saa syytteen seksuaalirikoxesta, jos se vaihtaa kuivat rintaliivit hikisten sijalle autotalliremontissa, ja lapsipuolet tölmää silloin paikalle. Esimurkkupojat raportoi siitä biologiselle äidille, joka nosti oikeusjutun, pojat oli kuulemma järkyttyneet. Se että sen mies vaihtaa paitaa vieressä, ja sen tyttäret näkee sen tissit paljaina, on ihan eri asia. Outoa rinnastusta. Pojat näki äitipuolen rinnat, näkee kai nyt unta tussusta. Nainen voi saada siitä vuoden vankeutta ja nimen ikuistetuxi Utahin seksuaalirikollisten hall of fameen.
    ellauri016.html on line 1146: Callekin tahtoi lentäjäxi, mutta Margit ei päästänyt, kun se on niin vaarallista. Kalle joutui tykinruuaxi, haavoittui kranunsirpaleesta silmään. Johannes vaan lenteli harmittomasti taivaalla, ei saanut siipeensä. Vihannexella oli musta tukka ja hitlerwiixet, pani Pirkon miettimään savolaisen osakunnan puurojuhlissa, kumman ottaisi. Mutta Johannes oli puiseva, luiseva Calle taiteellisempi, maalasi puurojuhlan kulissit. Pirkko valizi Callen, Vihannes Anjan. Loppu on ollutta ja nyt mennyttä, historiaa sensu stricto. Silloin kun Ilkasta tuli kartanonomistaja ja miljonääri, ja Callen poikasista vaan köyhiä kirjanoppineita, saattoi Pirkkoa vähän arveluttaa. Tuli vähän sanomistakin: eihän raha ole pääasia, mutta Ilkka on jo Havin toimitusjohtaja. Ja kun Ilkka sitten nai Erkylän kartanon rikkaan tyttären ja sen arvopaperit, Pirkko kyseli, missäs on sinun eka miljoonasi. No Ilkka pääsi piireihin reittä myöten, saa kiittää siitä Brotherusten sänkysilmiä. Ilkka kiittää isä Johannesta elämän aineettomista arvoista kuten saunalöylyistä, arvopapereista on kiittäminen täti Monicaa. Ja meneehän ne vessaharjatkin hyvin kaupaksi vaikkon rimpuloita.
    ellauri017.html on line 146: Yösotaa käydään kaihisilla silmillä.

    ellauri017.html on line 592: Uskonto ja matematiikka ovat lähisukulaisia, kuten fasistinen Platon hyvin oivalsi. Taivaassa on vain puhtaita ideoita, ei tarvi vaipanvaihtoa. Ne ei pissaa eikä kakkaa, on perseet niiltä tervattu. Ei tarvi xy-kromosomeja, kun pörrätään zeze-kärpäsinä z-ulottuvuuden neulankärjellä. Jumalunta syvää nukutaan siivet selässä on a point at infinity, taivaan häviävässä horisonttipisteessä. Hyvin mahdutaan, sillä ollaan nollia. Rappiolla on hyvä olla, ei rasita polla. Loppuu vanheneminen eikä satu, ei ainakaan mitään ikävää.
    ellauri017.html on line 605: In a polar coordinate system, the origin may also be called the pole. It does not itself have well-defined polar coordinates, because the polar coordinates of a point include the angle made by the positive x-axis and the ray from the origin to the point, and this ray is not well-defined for the origin itself.
    ellauri017.html on line 738: Israelin mennyt historia sisälsi oikeita ja vääriä profeetoita, joita seurakunnan piti tutkia. Tääkin on tuttua myös tiedealalla. Vääriä professoreita: työelämäsellaisia, lukeproffia, emerituxia ja emeritoja, tenureita ja ostettuja arvonimiä on et kummatkin kaljut päät yhteen kolkkaa. Kalju vasten pyllyä pump pump. Siinä sitä jotakin on. Kuten ex proffa Veijo Mustilainen voi totistaa.
    ellauri017.html on line 829: Eikä tietä sanoa, miten paljon jälkipolvet on panneet joukkoon omiaan, tehden historiasta ennusteita. Ennustaminen on vaikeaa, varsinkin tulewaisuuden ennustaminen, sanoi aikoinaan Ahti Karjalainen.
    ellauri017.html on line 954: CAicki pedot kedolla tulcat ja syökät, ja caicki pedot medzäsä. Ja heidän pitä menemän ulos ja cadzeleman ihmisten raatoja. Sillä joca härjän teurasta on nijncuin hän miehengin tappais. Joca lamban uhra on nijncuin jocu coiran caulan leickais. joca ruocauhria tuo on nijncuin jocu sicain werta uhrais. Jotca häntiäns pyhittäwät ja puhdistawat krydimais yxi täällä ja toinen siellä ja syöwät sian liha cauhistuxia ja Hijriä, caicki nämät pitä temmattaman pois.
    ellauri017.html on line 967: Toinen laajalti vallitseva näkemys on, että osa kirjan ensimmäisestä puoliskosta (luvut 1–39) on peräisin historiallisesta profeettasta, ja niiden välissä on kuningas Josian aikana 100 vuotta myöhemmin kirjoitettuja proosakommentteja ja että kirjan loppuosa on peräisin juuri ennen Babylonin pakkosiirtoa ja heti sen jälkeen , lähes kaksi vuosisataa historiallisen profeetan ajan jälkeen, ja ehkä nämä myöhemmät luvut edustavat meneillään olevan profeettakoulun työtä, joka profetoi jo tapahtuneen mukaisesti.
    ellauri017.html on line 1031: Jesajaa (arabia: إِشَعْيَاء, latinoitu: Ishaʿyāʾ) ei mainita nimellä Koraanissa tai Hadithissa, mutta hän esiintyy usein profeettana muslimilähteissä. Muslimien tutkijoiden mukaan Jesaja ennusti Jeesuksen ja Muhammedin tulemista, vaikka muiden uskontojen tutkijat kiistävät viittauksen Muhammediin. Muslimitraditio väittää, että Israelin epävanhurskaat yrittivät vihassaan tappaa Jesajan.
    ellauri017.html on line 1119: Muutama huomio Pyhän Hengen pilkasta syntinä: Jeesus opetti Jumalan Sanaa, kuten se on alunperin tarkoitettu Pyhissä Kirjoituksissa. Kirjanoppineet fariseukset eivät ymmärtäneet eikä hyväksyneet Jeesuksen opetusta. Fariseuksilla on monimutkaisia Perinnäissääntöjä, jotka olivat Raamatun opetuksen Vastaisia. Jeesus sai paljon peukutuksia ja fariseukset tulivat kateellisiksi Jeesukselle.
    ellauri018.html on line 281: Kun erakkoravut vaihtaa kuoria, ne haistaa kohtalotovereiden kuolemat: nyt on jossain haistettavasti huoneisto vapaana. Vai onko se maistamista kun haistaa vedessä? Haaskoo, teällä maestuu vaenajalta, tuumaa ilahtunut rapu, jota liian pieni vanha kämppä ahistaa. Vaenajoo ei ennee ahista.
    ellauri018.html on line 655: Spoileri: Jatko-osassa herra Huu saa lopulta antaa perixi, lyö hanskat tiskiin ja ottaa Pamin laillisesti vihityxi vaimoxi. Peto hävis, loinen voitti pachisipelin. Munasolut pääsi kotipesään ennen siittiöitä. Peli tunnetaan nyt backgammonina. Olli Koskimies pelas sitä kun se oli muotia. Nyt se on yhtä passé kuin squash ja takatukka.
    ellauri018.html on line 717: Sunnalaiset hyväxyy vaan Muhammedin teot esikuvaxi, shiialaiset myös myöhempiä paaveja. 14 erehtymätöntä on shialaisten pyhimyxiä. Muhammedin ja sen tyttären Fatima Zahran lisäxi sen vävy, serkku ja seuraaja Ali (kuvassa) ja 11 muuta lähisukulaista imaamia. Ne ois voinu tehä syntiä mut kiitos Allahin ne ei viittineet. Ne on tosi kunnollisia koko konkkaronkka. Ne hakkaa koko muun luomakunnan siinä, tuumii shiiat. Mahometilla oli kolme poikaa ja neljä tytärtä 13 vaimosta, ei paljon. Mitä se oikein nykräsi? Pojat kuoli pieninä, Fatima sai jatkaa sukua Ali-serkun vaimona. Löiköhän se sitä? Shiiat on niinku katolisia ja sunnit protestantteja. Arabia ja kaksoisvirran maa on sunneja ja Persia on shiioja. Miks niin? Olix ne 11 muuta pyhimystä sieltä päin? Näin se meni:
    ellauri018.html on line 719: 632: Muhammad dies. Abu Bakr is chosen as caliph, his successor. A minority favors Ali. They become known as Shiat Ali, or the partisans of Ali.
    ellauri018.html on line 721: 656: Ali becomes the fourth caliph after his predecessor is assassinated. Some among the Muslims rebel against him.
    ellauri018.html on line 725: 680: Hussein, son of Ali, marches against the superior army of the caliph at Karbala in Iraq. He is defeated, his army massacred, and he is beheaded. The split between Shiites and Sunnis deepens. Shiites consider Ali their first imam, Hussein the third.
    ellauri018.html on line 730: 873-940: In the period, known as the Lesser Occultation, the son of the 11th Imam disappears, leaving his representatives to head the Shiite faith.
    ellauri018.html on line 799: Kalifille kuuluu toimeenpanovalta, mutta hän ei kuitenkaan voi antaa uusia lakeja, sillä lainsäätäjä on ainoastaan Jumala, jonka sharialaki on annettu ikuisiksi ajoiksi ja muuttumattomana islamin pyhissä kirjoituksissa. Uutta lainsäädäntöä ei siten voi olla. Sitä vastaa lähinnä lakien tulkitseminen, joka kuuluu islamilaiselle papistolle ja etenkin mufteille. Tuomiovalta on jaettu kalifin ja uskonnollisten tuomioistuimien kesken.
    ellauri018.html on line 1126: Tarkotushakusesti muistetaan mikä kulloinkin näyttää tärkeältä, revitään valokuvia tai silitellään niitä kuin Leocadia tai ohimoon lasautettu Amaro. Kirjotetaan historiaa uudestaan ja uudestaan. Juhlat ja kuvat jatkaa sitä. Näihin kuviin, näihin tunnelmiin. Muu haihtuu välistä, kun ei tullut otetuxi kuvia.
    ellauri019.html on line 28: Täällä Marja Syrtti, Helsingin kasarmintori. Tänään on suuri päivä Suomen ja länsiliittoutuneiden maanpuolustushenkiselle väestölle, kun sarjakuvalehti Korkeajännitys on juhlnut 50-vuotisjuhlaansa näyttävin menoin ja ohimarssein puolustusvoimain komentajan, amiraali Kaskealan sinivalkoisten silmien alla. Paraatiin ovat osallistuneet kaikki Korkkarissa vuosien varrella maalla merellä ja ilmassa seikkailleet joukko-osastot. Paraatissa nähtiin divisioonittain urheita brittisotilaita Euroopan rintamilta, Sahaan taistelukentiltä ja Kauko-Idän kuolemanloukuista. Korkkarin 50-v päivän näyttävintä antia olivat brittien voittamattoman laivaston ja kuninkaallisten ilmavoimien ylilennot, puhumattakaan urheista norjalaisista vastarintamiehistä ja nazisioista kello kahdessa. Eli täällä kasarmitorilla on nautittu miehisen ystävyyden kukoistuxesta (c) E.Saarinen, ja mustavalkoisesta maailmankuvasta värikkäissä kansissa.
    ellauri019.html on line 35: Once they're understood as more than just absurdities, these cartoons can be seen clearly as the work of an angry man. And there is, after all, much in this world for a decent man to be angry about. "Look around, read the newspapers,"as Kliban said. "You don't have to stretch out too much to see a little darkness out there."
    ellauri019.html on line 48: Rauhasta ei mitään tietoa, se ei enää mitenkään eroo sodasta. Miten kauan kanuunankuulat lentää ennenkuin ne kielletään, kysyi feikki-irkku huuliharppunobelisti. Ei ne enää lennä vaikkei kielletä, ne on aseteknisesti vanhanaikaisia. Sodat suhisee kyberavaruudessa. Tehokkain ase on nälistäminen eli talouspakote. Societé des Nations väsähti heti suursodan jälkeen, nyt on United Nations lähes yhtä mäsänä kuin United States. Seuraavassa savotassa saattaa mennä itämaatkin, kun on taas Kiinan vuoro uhota.
    ellauri019.html on line 136: Tämmösiä Panzerfausteja Calle autto purkaa laatikosta Ihantalan verilöylyssä. Se oli ollu Sakuissa just ennen sodan alkua koululaisvaihdossa, ja osas sen vuox tavata sakemannin käyttöohjetta. Mistä päästä panos sisään ja mistä ulos, kuva 1. Joku teknisesti lahjakkaampi kersantti ruhjo sillä sitten ryssän tankkeja. Verisexi tohjoxi. Äijät lensi tankista kuin tikkapelin tikat. Tai tukehtu sen sisään kuin itämeren shprotit purkkiinsa. Mitäs läxivät. No ei niidenkään mielipidettä siinä kysytty. Luoti päähän edestä tai niskalaukaus, siinä rivimiehen optiot. Loppu on historiaa, eli propagandaa.
    ellauri019.html on line 310: Egyptistä lähdöstä Juudan historian loppuvaiheisiin. Faraon joukkojen tuho ja Israelin ihmeellinen vapautus Punaisellamerellä vaikuttivat Edomiin samoin kuin koko Kanaaniin ja sen ympäristöseutuun (2Mo 15:14, 15). Siinain niemimaan erämaa-alueella Israel joutui ensi kerran kohtaamaan aseellista vastarintaa laajalle levittäytyneen edomilaisheimon, amalekilaisten, taholta; kautta aikojen he aiheuttivat Israelille vaikeuksia (2Mo 17:8–16; vrt. 1Mo 36:12, 16; ks. AMALEK, AMALEKILAISET). Erämaavaelluksen loppupuolella evättiin Mooseksen esittämä kunnioittava pyyntö saada kulkea Edomin läpi Kuninkaan valtatietä, ja nimeltä mainitsematon edomilaiskuningas järjesti voimakkaan joukon estämään israelilaisten maahantunkeutumisen (4Mo 20:14–21). Sen jälkeen kun Aaron oli kuollut Horinvuorella lähellä Edomin rajaa (4Mo 20:22–29), Israel kiersi Edomin ydinalueen, leiriytyi Seredin purolaakson liepeille ja taivalsi sitten kohti pohjoista Moabin itärajan ohi (4Mo 21:4, 10–13; Tu 11:18; vrt. 5Mo 2:26–29).
    ellauri019.html on line 326: Edomilaisten itsensä kirjoittamia asiakirjoja ei ole löydetty. Muiden kansakuntien maallinen historia kuitenkin mainitsee heidät. Eräässä egyptiläisessä papyruksessa, jonka otaksutaan olevan peräisin toiselta vuosituhannelta eaa., kerrotaan edomilaisten beduiiniheimojen tulleen Niilin suistoon etsimään laidunmaata karjalleen. Faraot Merenptah ja Ramses III väittivät hallinneensa Edomia, samoin kuin Assyrian monarkki Adadnirari III. Jolloinkin tämän viimeksi mainitun kuninkaan jälkeen Tiglat-Pileser III (Ahasin aikalainen) kehuskelee saaneensa pakkoveroa ”Edomin Kaušmalakulta”, kun taas Sanheribin seuraaja Assarhaddon mainitsee ”Qaušgabrin” edomilaisten vasallikuninkaiden luettelossa (Ancient Near Eastern Texts, toim. J. Pritchard, 1974, s. 282, 291).
    ellauri019.html on line 332: Myöhempi historia ja katoaminen. Jehovan profeetan Jeremian välityksellä Edomin kuningasta varoitettiin siitä, että Babylonin kuningas Nebukadnessar panisi ikeen hänen niskaansa (Jer 27:1–7). Sitä, mitä edomilaiset todellisuudessa tekivät tässä tilanteessa, ei kerrota. Jerusalemin tuhouduttua 607 eaa. jotkut maanpakoon joutuneet juutalaiset saivat kuitenkin tilapäisen turvapaikan Edomista. Kun babylonialaisarmeijat sitten olivat lähteneet, nämä pakolaiset palasivat omaan maahansa ja pakenivat lopulta Egyptiin. (Jer 40:11, 12; 43:5–7.) Pian koitti aika, jolloin Edomin oli siemaistava syvään Jehovan vihastuksen maljasta (Jer 25:15–17, 21). Tämä tapahtui suunnilleen 500-luvun eaa. puolivälissä Babylonian kuninkaan Nabunaidin hallitessa. Babylonian historian ja kirjallisuuden tutkijan C. J. Gaddin mukaan Nabunaidin joukoissa, jotka voittivat Edomin ja Teman, oli mukana juutalaissotilaita. Kommentoidessaan tätä John Lindsay kirjoitti: ”Täten profeetan sanat täyttyivät ainakin osittain, kun hän kirjoitti Jahvesta sanoen: ’Minä langetan kostoni Edomille kansani Israelin kädellä.’ (Hes. 25:14.) Osittain ovat täyttyneet myös Obadjan sanat, joiden mukaan Edomin ’liittolaiset’, ’luotetut ystävät’ ’pettäisivät’ sen, ’veisivät siitä voiton’ ja ’panisivat paulan sen eteen’. Tässä saatamme nähdä viittauksen babylonialaisiin, jotka Nebukadressarin päivinä olivat halukkaita antamaan sen saada osansa Juudan tappiosta, mutta Nabunaidin alaisuudessa tukahduttivat kaikiksi ajoiksi Edomin kaupalliset pyrkimykset. (Vrt. Ob. 1 ja 7.)” (Palestine Exploration Quarterly, Lontoo 1976, s. 39.)
    ellauri019.html on line 368: Kuningas istui vankina palatsissa, ypö yksin. Ibbi-Sin kyyhötti ahistuneena palatsissa, ypö yxin. Huvilassaan E-namtilassa hän itki katkerasti. Tuhotulva jyräsi alleen kaiken. Se ärjyi kuin hirmumyrsky maan yli -- kuka voisi paeta siltä? -- tuhotaxeen kaupungin, tuhotaxeen talon, niin että petturit löhöisivät lojaalisten virkamiesten niskan päällä, ja petturien veri valuisi kunnon kaverien ylle.
    ellauri019.html on line 464: Akkadien tultua pelatuxi ulos Urista sinne asettautui gutilaisia, barbaareja koillisesta taas. Sumerien historia ja varsinkin hyvät tarinat jäi elämään assyrialaisten ja babylonialaisten muistissa. Ize mestaa valloitteli assyrialaiset ja elamilaiset vuoron perään. Irakin ja Iranin sodilla on pitkät perinteet.
    ellauri019.html on line 498: Paljon ne on saavuttaneet, paljon ottaneet myös turpiin. Tärkeiljöinä eivät tajunneet talmudin ja tooran kaupallista potentiaalia. Paitsi Pave, sehän on ex-jutku. Se ymmärsi, että pakkauxeen kanzii panna texti "uusi, parannettu formula", ja antaa ilmaisia näytteitä, kaupata tietosanakirjaa ovelta ovelle kuin Dortmunder, esitellä ihmeitä kuin imureita. Asiakaskunta innostui, liikevaihto kasvoi kohisten. Muut fariseuxet kateudesta vihreinä seuras vierestä.
    ellauri019.html on line 551: Raamattu on potpurri EU-säädöksiä, Ur-jeremiadeja ja J-armoilua. Lakia, historiaa ja propagandaa. Propaganda tulee paavin kirjelmästä De propaganda fide, joka puhuu uskon levityxestä.
    ellauri019.html on line 586: Kaikki, jotka ovat sijoittaneet USA:han, amerikkalaisiin velkakirjoihin, osakkeisiin tai joiden omaisuus on pääasiassa sidottu dollariin, ovat jo menettäneet kaikki nämä rahansa. He eivät vain vielä tiedä sitä. Kevättalvella alkaa dollarin historiallinen alamäki lähes Zimbabwen malliin. Luulenpa, että tämän myötä kaatuu jopa Suomen Nordea pankki. Ei noin suuria summia voi hävitä ilman vakavia seuraamuksia. Tosin näkyni rahasta on vielä avoinna. Hampurilainen maksaa kohta 600 dollaria, jee, jee...
    ellauri019.html on line 750: Haaviston vehkeilyssä on vanhatestamentillista julmuutta. Toi virkamies oli ehkä homofoobinen ja oisi saanut ansionsa mukaan mennä vankilaan. Pekka ite taitaa olla misogyyni, viis piittaa rättipäiden äidintunteista. Mihis tarvittaisiinkaan mamujen naisenpuolia, kun on tarjolla niin paljon miehekkäitä takapuolia.
    ellauri019.html on line 909: Ruudussa herot ähisee ja huitoo hikisinä

    ellauri019.html on line 1000: Kultapäivännouto on Euroopassa yleinen kukka, joka kuvassa muistuttaa meidän yrttitarhassa kirkkaankeltaisina kukkivia helokkeja. Ei kuitenkaan ole sen lähisukulainen. Helokki on horsmakasvi, päivännouto malvan sukua. Se on luonnonvaraisena harvinainen ja rauhoitettu Suomessa.
    ellauri019.html on line 1026: The Lega Serie A announced its series of anti-racism initiatives, including a representative from every team and a controversial choice of art works. The presentation had as its centre-piece three pieces from internationally renowned artist Simone Fugazzotto, who uses chimps and apes in motifs throughout all of his paintings.
    ellauri020.html on line 31: Ei tästä tullutkaan iloista nallen puhinaa, vaan lisää oxennuxen puhistusta kotisoffalta, paljon saippuaa. Naimisiin mentyään sodan jälkeen Pipa ja Sepu söivät paljon jymyhunajaa, äiti varsinkin paisui aika palloxi. Se pelkäs vähän ettei Calle tykkäisi. Kysy rakastatko vielä minua. Siitä saippuassakin on paljolti kysymys.
    ellauri020.html on line 169: Yritteliäät naiset ei kilpaile vaan miehistä meikeillä ja vaatteilla, niillä on myös pientä mamubisnestä, leipovat ja myyvät samoosa piirakoita ja välittävät nyysittyjä huiveja, puukottavat toisiansa selkään bisnesmielessä. Iivana myös.
    ellauri020.html on line 186: Loppuvuodesta 2009 Iivana Trump nousi otsikoihin ympäri maailmaa, kun virkavalta joutui poistamaan hänet jo kiitotielle ehtineestä matkustajakoneesta. Trump oli matkustamassa Delta Air Lines -lennolla Palm Beachista New Yorkiin, ja hän oli jo ehtinyt asettautua paikalleen koneen ykkösluokassa, kun hän vihastui ja alkoi kiroilla ja huutaa paikalla olleille lapsille näiden kovaäänisyydestä. Trump huusi myös muille matkustajille sekä lentokoneen henkilökunnalle, ja kiitotielle siirtyneen koneen kapteenin piti lopulta palata terminaaliin ja tehdä ilmoitus häiriköivästä matkustajasta.
    ellauri020.html on line 208: Katrinka pitää setämiehistä. Sen panee paxuxi sama nallemainen ohjaajasetä joka filmasi sitä pikkutyttönä. Se on tarpeexi vanha ollaxeen Katrinkan isä, siis just sopiva sen lapsen isäxi. Mirek ohjaa siittimensä sen sisään. Pääsee ekana maaliin sen pörröiseen kaikkein pyhimpään. Sujahtaa viimeisten porttilippujen välistä, sauva pystyssä, suxi luistaa hyvin, lumi pöllyää, kansa hurraa kotikazomoissa.
    ellauri020.html on line 286: Mut hei herrahissi seis! Siihen astuu nyt toinen diileri, kuvauxesta päätellen ize Donald Duck. Ruumiikas jäbä, vino suu, arrogantti maneeri. NZ poliisisarjassa oli sorsanmezästysseuran johtaja, jonka nimi oli Donald Duck. Muutti nimensä Duckerixi, kun kaverit nauroivat.
    ellauri020.html on line 301: Ivana, a Czeck immigrant, met Donald Trump in 1976 while attending a fashion show in New York, according to the New York Post. By the next year, the couple had married, and in short order had had three kids and became steady figures in the New York socialite scene. Trump had been at the bar in Maxwell’s Plum. Maxwell’s Plum is gone now, but the very name evokes the era of frantic singles underneath the Art Nouveau ceiling. It was the place where flight attendants hoped to find bankers, and models looked for dates. Donald met his model, Ivana Zelnickova, visiting from Montreal. She liked to tell the story of how she had gone skiing with Donald, pretending to be a learner like him, and then humiliated him by whizzing past him down the slopes.
    ellauri020.html on line 374: Unlike his last two weddings, Donald Trump´s first marriage to Ivana in 1977 was strangely private; it´s almost impossible to find any photographic evidence of their big day on the internet. But we do know that it took place in the Marble Collegiate Church and that the New York mayor was present, per Vanity Fair.
    ellauri020.html on line 376: Trump has been married three times, for those of you keeping score at home. Each of Trump´s weddings was memorable in its own way, in keeping with Trump´s penchant for the extravagant. In his 1993 nuptials at his second wedding, the caviar alone cost $60,000, a small sum compared to the $2 million tiara she borrowed; and his third marriage to Melania, in 2005, included a 200-pound wedding cake, one of the most expensive known cakes in modern history. The bride´s $100,000 Christian Dior gown was adorned with 1,500 crystals, rendering it so heavy that Melania was told to be sure to eat before the wedding, per Vogue, so she´d have the strength to wear it.
    ellauri020.html on line 387: Celebs have an interesting li-ife. Vanha raha on valonarkaa, uusi raha pitää ilmaisesta mainosajasta. Sama mitä sanotaan kuha mainitaan. Aku ei halvexi ketään jolla on paljon massia. Jäähän siitä yli aika monta miljardia köyhää halvexittavaa. Se on menestyxen mitta loppupeleissä. Net worth is what counts. President Trump lies his to be 3.1G$.
    ellauri020.html on line 391: Trump spoke in a hypnotic, unending torrent of words. Often he appeared to free-associate. He referred to himself in the third person: “Trump says. . . Trump believes.” His phrases skibbled around and doubled back on themselves like fireworks in a summer sky. He reminded me of a carnival barker trying to fill his tent. “I’m more popular now than I was two months ago. There are two publics as far as I’m concerned. The real public and then there’s the New York society horseshit. The real public has always liked Donald Trump. The real public feels that Donald Trump is going through Trump-bashing. When I go out now, forget about it. I’m mobbed. It’s bedlam,” Trump told me. Donald is a believer in the big-lie theory,” his lawyer had told me. “If you say something again and again, people will believe you.” “One of my lawyers said that?” Trump said when I asked him about it. “I think if one of my lawyers said that, I’d like to know who it is, because I’d fire his ass. I’d like to find out who the scumbag is!”
    ellauri020.html on line 395: Donald Trump has always viewed his father as a role model. In The Art of the Deal, he wrote, “Fred Trump was born in New Jersey in 1905. His father, who came here from Sweden . . . owned a moderately successful restaurant.” In fact, the Trump family was German and desperately poor. “At one point my mother took in stitching to keep us going,” Trump’s father told me. “For a time, my father owned a restaurant in the Klondike, but he died when I was young.” Donald’s cousin John Walter once wrote out an elaborate family tree. “We shared the same grandfather,” Walter told me, “and he was German. So what?”
    ellauri020.html on line 399: For years, Ivana appeared to have studied the public behavior of the royals. Her friends now called this “Ivana’s imperial-couple syndrome,” and they teased her about it, for they knew that Ivana, like Donald, was inventing and reinventing herself all the time. When she had first come to New York, she wore elaborate helmet hairdos and bouffant satin dresses, very Hollywood; her image of rich American women probably came from the movies she had seen as a child. Ivana had now spent years passing through the fine rooms of New York, but she had never seemed to learn the real way of the truly rich, the art of understatement. Instead, she had become regal, filling her houses with the kind of ormolu found in palaces in Eastern Europe. She had taken to waving to friends with tiny hand motions, as if to conserve her energy. At her own charity receptions, she insisted that she and Donald form a receiving line, and she would stand in pinpoint heels, never sinking into the deep grass—such was her control.
    ellauri020.html on line 439: As a philanthropist, he is known for his $1 billion gift to support the United Nations, which created the United Nations Foundation, a public charity to broaden U.S. support for the UN. Turner serves as Chairman of the United Nations Foundation board of directors.
    ellauri020.html on line 441: Turner´s media empire began with his father´s billboard business, Turner Outdoor Advertising, which he took over in 1963 after his father´s suicide. It was worth $1 million. His purchase of an Atlanta UHF station in 1970 began the Turner Broadcasting System. CNN revolutionized news media, covering the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster in 1986 and the Persian Gulf War in 1991.
    ellauri020.html on line 443: Turner´s penchant for controversial statements earned him the nicknames "The Mouth of the South" and "Captain Outrageous". He was the largest private landowner in the United States until John C. Malone surpassed him in 2011. He uses much of his land for ranches to re-popularize bison meat (for his Ted´s Montana Grill chain), amassing the largest herd in the world. He also created the environmental-themed animated series Captain Planet and the Planeteers.
    ellauri020.html on line 456: Helped me MAGA in his own small way.

    ellauri020.html on line 468: We were walking through the rubble of the Commodore Hotel, which would soon reopen as the Grand Hyatt. Ivana had been given the responsibility of supervising all the decoration; she was hard at it, despite the fact that she was wearing a white wool Thierry Mugler jumpsuit and pale Dior shoes as she picked her way through the sawdust. “I told you never to leave a broom like this in a room!” she screamed at one worker. Screaming at her employees had become part of her hallmark, perhaps her way of feeling power. Later, in Atlantic City, she would become known for her obsession with cleanliness. Determined to bring glamour to Trump Castle, she became famous for her attention to appearances, once moving a pregnant waitress, desperate for big tips, off the casino floor. The woman was placed in a distant lounge and given a clown’s suit to disguise her condition.
    ellauri020.html on line 538: Kaikilla on jotain syytä valittaa ja toisia syitä olla tyytyväisiä. Katrinka on ökyrikas, istuu ökyjahissa Venetsian lidolla pikku pikku bikinissä muki kädessä ympärillään Öky Ankka ja sen ökykumppanit. Olen onnen ankka ja tiedän sen, se sanoo haikeana. Ankanpojat puuttuvat, Tupu, Hupu ja Lupu, Leenu, Liinu ja Tiinu. Kaikkea ei voi saada, Tuomas vahvistaa. Meemit on kunnossa, geenit menee munille.
    ellauri020.html on line 559: Naiset pitää joskus kiinni mulkeroista miehistä van sixi, et on noloa myöntää valinneensa väärin, langenneensa vanhanaikaiseen.
    ellauri020.html on line 590: Aku uiskentelee filmitähden liiveissä, aikoo ostaa varmaan sitä varten oman filmistudion. Iines rähisee sille siitä mustaräpyläisenä niin että nokka vipattaa. Aku vittuilee rumasti ja läimii ovia. Tää on varmaan lopun alkua.
    ellauri020.html on line 594: Katan tekis mieli ostaa taas hotelli mut hirviääkö sitä. Kerskakulutus on laskussa ja sotilasmenot nousussa. Akulle se on ok, huviveneitä menee vähemmän, mutta tykkiveneitä enemmän. Varma bisnes kuin Kone Oylla: noususuhdanteessa ostetaan uusia hissejä, laskusuhdanteessa korjataan vanhoja.
    ellauri020.html on line 646: Beginning in 1987, Trump had a widely-publicized relationship with Marla Maples, a blond model-actress from Georgia who was then 26. The two met in New York City, Newsweek reports, when Trump was throwing a party to celebration the publication of his book, The Art of the Deal. Maples began to frequent Atlantic City, and the affair dominated headlines during the late eighties.
    ellauri020.html on line 648: In her new book, Raising Trump, Ivana writes about the time in December 1989 when she was confronted by Maples at a ski resort in Aspen, per AP. "This young blonde woman approached me out of the blue and said ´I´m Marla and I love your husband. Do you?´ I said ´Get lost. I love my husband.´ It was unladylike but I was in shock." Apparently it was in this moment she realized her marriage with Donald was over.
    ellauri020.html on line 650: Trump alluded to his extramarital affair in a 1994 interview with ABC Primetime Live, per the New York Daily News, calling his life at the time "a bowl of cherries." He added, "The business was so great ... a beautiful girlfriend, a beautiful wife, a beautiful everything." He also muses that, if the Marla-Ivana confrontation hadn´t happened, it´s possible he would´ve continued on seeing his mistress.
    ellauri020.html on line 652: Seuravana päivänä hiihtohisseillä Aku koittaa vielä pitää kiinni kummastakin, äta kakan och ha den kvar. Niinkuin pikkulapset ottaessaan 2 lelua, hukkaa molemmat. Saa paskan palkakseen, ei pokaalia vaan kakan, lyö vallan kätösensä siihen ihteensä. Tanjushka laskettelee tiehensä kuin Tiikeri-Jack. Aku ei taaskaan pysy perässä. Tanjalla on nopeampi kopukka. Aku on kuin Cadillac, kurja kääntösäde. Jean-Jacques on kuin rättisitikka, käzy kaupunkiajossa ja helppo parkkeerattava. Mut ensin kaikki tytöt spiidaa kuorossa Katrinkan pahaa onnea, Frendit ei ole yllättyneitä ja salaa vahingoniloisia, kompastuipahan toi tekopyhä Kalinkakin lopulta. Juhaa joka kikkaili sattui viimein leukaan. Tuli kikkelistä kotirouvan pannuun.
    ellauri020.html on line 661: Liz Smith had broken the story of the Trumps’ separation. The entire sordid history of Marla Maples and Ivana fighting on the Aspen ski slopes was all over the papers.
    ellauri020.html on line 671: The Donald-Ivana relationship on the whole was oddly transactional. Trump once said of his cutthroat prenup, per Newsweek, "I would never buy Ivana any decent jewels or pictures. Why give her negotiable assets?" Ah, marriage: Such a romantic institution! Their prenup was amended a few times after this; on Christmas Eve of 1987, Trump reportedly asked her to resign an updated agreement, giving her $25 million. In the end, Ivana made out with $14 million, among other perks, after a months-long battle of divorce proceedings that reached a settlement in 1991.
    ellauri020.html on line 673: In fact, Trump blamed the divorce in part on the entanglement between Ivana and his business. Trump, early on, brought her in on his real estate empire. She worked at the Trump Organization as a president for his Atlantic City casino, Cosmopolitan reports, and later a manager for the Plaza Hotel, which he bought in 1988, per People.
    ellauri020.html on line 679: Akulle ja Natalielle tuli bänet ja Aku heiluu poikamiehenä muttei laske irti Koljasta, ihan kiusalla. Mut sit Lontoossa tärppää: entinen hiihtohissin komee viikinki, se rags to riches lehtikeisari, se jolta paloi perhe siis, on vapaalla jalalla. Se on pitkä kuin joulukuusi, ja näin vanhempana ei enää liian nätti, sillä on nyt enempi kiloja ja luonnetta. Ja osaa sanoa dobry den tshekiksi. Se on hurjan menestyvä ja miehekäs, mutta silti hellä, huumorintajuinen ja säälivä. Kaikin puolin kuin kovakavioinen mutta ihanan pehmeäturpainen luupää hevonen. Hirn! Iih! Iihahaha. Obladi, oblada, life goes on bra, and sometimes it goes well without a bra. Taas tulee oveen eteen kukkakori, se näyttää olevan kultapossujen standardi tapa sanoa "nussitaax?". Parempi konsti kuin Petsku paran Zanussi tupakka-aski, josta peitetään "Za", näytetään aski pokalle ja sanotaan yksin tein vaan "taaks?". Mutta kalliimpi.
    ellauri020.html on line 697: Katrinkalla on nyt uutisia kerrottavana kaveripiirille, ja millaisia! Ai-jai-jai! huutaa Katrinka tshekixi kuin intiaani. Yahii! Se on sillä tavaramerkkinä, ja väärät verbit kuten Wokulla. Se ärsytti Akua, ja Rikua. Wolmar ei välitä. - Markku ja mä mentiin just naimisiin, vauva on tulossa, ja tää komia poika on mun tshekkiäpärä! Nyt juodaan malja! To business! Yes, to business! For this moment at least, she had it all. Onnen pipanoita.
    ellauri020.html on line 706:

    Ivana Trump is a former model and ex-wife of Donald Trump. She and Trump were part of New York City´s social elite during the 1980s. The two split in 1990 and Ivana won a $20 million divorce settlement. She later published The Best Is Yet to Come: Coping With Divorce and Enjoying Life Again. In it, she advised divorcees to "take his wallet to the cleaners."
    ellauri020.html on line 721: However unlikely it seemed, Ivana was now considered a tabloid heroine, and her popularity seemed in inverse proportion to the fickle city’s new dislike of her husband. “Ivana is now a media goddess on par with Princess Di, Madonna, and Elizabeth Taylor,” Liz Smith reported. Months earlier, Ivana had undergone cosmetic reconstruction with a California doctor. She emerged unrecognizable to her friends and perhaps her children, as fresh and innocent of face as Heidi of Edelweiss Farms. Although she had negotiated four separate marital-property agreements over the last fourteen years, she was suing her husband for half his assets. Trump was trying to be philosophical. “When a man leaves a woman, especially when it was perceived that he has left for a piece of ass—a good one!—there are 50 percent of the population who will love the woman who was left,” he told me.
    ellauri021.html on line 54: Parasta Willereissä oli pukinpartaisen Kit Carlsonin kiroilu: Pannahinen! Lempo! Mitä hittoa?! Jukoliste! Saamari! Texissä izessään oli jotain Fred Karlssonmaista, vaivoin hillittyä primaaliaggressiota. Pukinpartainen seniori vois sit olla Kimmo. Mä oisin pikku Kit. Oikea Kit Carlson oli jonkun kenr.Washingtonin heitukkana kansanmurhaamassa lounaiskulman inkkareita. Siitä historiasta on tehty aivan vitusti väärennöxiä. Tony Hillerman kertoo muisteluissaan melko hilpeitä tarinoita valkonaamamatujen törkeilyistä punaisten varattomien veljiensä kimpussa.
    ellauri021.html on line 58: Willereiden valkohattuiset on huolellisesti ajellut (paizi sitä joulupukkia, mut senkin parta on siististi kammattu), konnat on ajelemattomia ja epäsiistejä. Ne on köyhiä. Ne ei ole oman elämänsä seppoja, vaan jotain teuvoja. Intiaaneilla on vaan housut säästä riippumatta, mut ne on kaikki komeita ja lihaxikkaita, kuin tinasotilaita samasta muotista. Niitä ei voi sanoa köyhixi, koska ne painii eri sarjassa. Ne on vielä kivikaudella, vaikka osaakin käyttää pyssyjä. Muttei ammu niillä yhtä tarkasti kuin Tex Willer. Siihen pitää olla valkoihoinen. Osa inkkareista on hyvixiä, osa razastelee pahisten puolella. Harhaanjohdettuja villejä. Tuhlaa panoxia, paukuttelee ilmaan ilman aikojaan, huutaen Yahii, tai Aijaijai, kuten Ivana Trump. Hmm. Olikohan noin, tuskin niillä oli pateja tuhlattavaxi asti.
    ellauri021.html on line 184: Harhailuistaan huolimatta kansanedustaja Heinonen on vilpitön kokkari ja automies, joka epäilee uusia peltipoliiseja liian tehokkaixi. Jari Aarnio oli parempi vaikkei peltiä. Kun muut kauhistelevat liikenteen päästöjä, Heinonen hehkuttaa Jyväskylän rallia. "Yhdestoista vuosi perä jälkeen, hei kuka muu vetää tälleen." Hanaa!
    ellauri021.html on line 277: onko Rauhis vielä pystyssä, vai

    ellauri021.html on line 459: Herr Wolkenbruch Zürichis

    ellauri021.html on line 671: For nix was scattered o'er this mundus,
    ellauri021.html on line 675: The corpus of this bonus canis
    ellauri021.html on line 687: This bonus dog had one bad habit,
    ellauri021.html on line 691: But on this nixy moonlight night
    ellauri021.html on line 692: This old canis did just right.
    ellauri021.html on line 709: As his powers non longius carry,
    ellauri021.html on line 711: On the nix his corpus lieth.
    ellauri021.html on line 736: Of the which this is the carmen.
    ellauri021.html on line 920: Kannattavat naisten osallistumista taisteluihin ja sekamiehistöjä sukellusveneissä.


  • ellauri021.html on line 923: Suurentelevat naisten osuutta historiassa, esim. Henry VIII:n vaimot on tärkeämpiä kuin sen hallintotoimet.

  • ellauri021.html on line 939: Se mikä mua näissä Daytonan apinajutuissa kiehtoo ehkä eniten, on miten samanlaisia ne on aina ja kautta aikojen. Vaan detaljit voi vaihtua (esim. sekamiehistöt sukellusveneissä vaiko miesten taloja). Herb Simon oli kyllä NIIN oikeassa.
    ellauri021.html on line 943: Schlafly is a surname of German-Swiss origin. Not to be confused with Schläfli. Mild-mannered Daniel L. Schlafly Sr., vice president of a family business (bottled water), AKA Dan Schlafly, 47 in 1960, is a Roman Catholic who never attended a public school* and never sent his three children to one. Daniel L. Schafly Jr. spent eight years in Jesuit schools, then went on to graduate work in the US and abroad. He chose history as major. As a twenty-one- year-old student, he was amazed by the result of the Soviet victory in World War II when he crossed the Berlin Wall (still under construction) from free West Berlin with its independent citizens into militarized Communist East Berlin, where everyone was dispirited, everything was shabby. Daniel L. Jr., who supported St. Kolbe´s sainthood, became a staunch anticommunist.
    ellauri021.html on line 982: Vasemmistolaisuus ei ole vain väärin, se on pahaa ja mädännäistä. Demokraattipuolueella on Moolokin naamari, kanaanilaisen jumalan, jota Milton kuzui "kauheaxi kuninkaaxi jonka kita / oli ruskeana ihmisparsojen hurmeesta". Dem. puolue on rikollisuuden ja kuoleman kultti. Jokaisessa menettelytapakysymyxessä demokraatit on kaaoxen ja tuhon puolella. Ne hypettää valkoisen ylivallan uhkaa samalla kun ne valkopesee islamilaista terrorismia. Ne kumittaa ahkerasti USAn historiaa ja syö meidän pyhiä kansalaisoikeuxia. Ne peukuttaa avoimia rajoja kansallisen turvallisuuden hinnalla; pyhittää kaupungit rikollisille mamuille ja ajaa maahanmuuttoviraston sulkemista lainkuuliaisten kansalaisten ja kunnollisten maahantulijoiden tuhoxi; lasten tappoa ihmiselämän pyhyyden sijaan; länsimaisen sivistyxen purkamista sen säilytyxen sijasta. Tää ei oo vaan väärin, tää on PAHA.
    ellauri022.html on line 156: Yhdysvaltain historia on minimekko, lyhyt ja sexikäs, ei peitä polvia.

    ellauri022.html on line 263: Shawt retrenchaa vauhdilla, isoäidin kalut konfiskoidan vuokralaisilta. Pannaan vahinko kiertämään. Rikas antaa pahastaankin. Rouva Shaw kesti takaiskut kuin sankarittaren äiskä North and Southissa, eli huonosti. Osat ovat vaihtuneet, Polly pääsee jakelemaan oikeita hyvyyden korvapuusteja. Nyt se tietää ja osaa kaiken paremmin, nukkavierun ammattilainen neuvoo uusköyhiä.
    ellauri022.html on line 331: This much-enduring man,
    ellauri022.html on line 336: While safely in his attic locked,
    ellauri022.html on line 342: Or to his tower sped —
    ellauri022.html on line 343: Till vanishing from this rude world,
    ellauri022.html on line 349: To leave his lonely lair;
    ellauri022.html on line 354: Scared the poor hermit from his cell,
    ellauri022.html on line 355: The woodchuck from his door.
    ellauri022.html on line 373: And this — and this, is fame!
    ellauri022.html on line 397: And round this sad memorial,
    ellauri022.html on line 421: Kilppeys on yxi sdradegia muiden joukossa. Oikein käytettynä se toimii kuin junan vessa, kuten kerrotaan sadussa Myrskytuuli ja päivänpaiste. Kun se menee pieleen, kaikki suuttuvat. Sitä ei ehkä kannata yrittää, kun resut on tosi vähissä. Tulee turpaan joka kantilta. Ei parane silloin jäädä tuleen makaamaan.
    ellauri022.html on line 425:

    The fable was well known in Ancient Greece; Athenaeus records that Hieronymus of Rhodes, in his Historical Notes, quoted an epigram of Sophocles against Euripides that parodied the story of Helios and Boreas.[2] It related how Sophocles had his cloak stolen by a boy to whom he had made love. Euripides joked that he had had that boy too, and it did not cost him anything. Sophocles´ reply satirises the adulteries of Euripides: "It was the Sun, and not a boy, whose heat stripped me naked; as for you, Euripides, when you were kissing someone else´s wife the North Wind screwed you. You are unwise, you who sow in another´s field, to accuse Eros of being a snatch-thief."
    ellauri022.html on line 456: It is sometimes used pejoratively, referring to someone whose optimism is excessive to the point of naïveté or refusing to accept the facts of an unfortunate situation. This pejorative use can be heard in the introduction of the 1930 George and Ira Gershwin song "But Not For Me": "I never want to hear from any cheerful pollyannas/who tell me fate supplies a mate/that´s all bananas." (performed by Judy Garland in the 1943 movie Girl Crazy).
    ellauri022.html on line 494: This time, stop frequently to ask pertinent questions and engage children in discussion.
    ellauri022.html on line 499: ➢ What happened to_________in this story?
    ellauri022.html on line 500: ➢ How did this make_________feel?
    ellauri022.html on line 501: ➢ What do you suppose_________was thinking inside his/her head?
    ellauri022.html on line 507: ➢ Would you have ended the story like this? If not, how would you end the book? Why did you pick this ending?
    ellauri022.html on line 539: Tämän nimisessä niteessä Siiri hongankolistaja kolaa entisiä skizojaan. Tall girl syndroomaa, norjalaisuutta, avioliittoa sitä izeään kuuluisamman jutkukirjailijan kaa, paparazzeja. Rauhoittuaxeen se soittaa jazzia. Charlie Parkeria, pahinta hissimusaa.
    ellauri022.html on line 672: Briteissä se ihastu Carlyleen, toiseen yxilönpalvojaan, jonka miälest historia on suurmiesten elämäkertoja. No tääkin paasaus on sitten ilmeisesti historiaa.
    ellauri022.html on line 708: "It can hardly be true that the difference lies in the attribute of reason. I saw ten, twenty, a hundred large lipped, lowbrowed black men in the streets who, except in the mere matter of language, did not exceed the sagacity of the elephant. Now is it true that these were created superior to this wise animal, and designed to control it? And in comparison with the highest orders of men, the Africans will stand so low as to make the difference which subsists between themselves & the sagacious beasts inconsiderable."
    ellauri022.html on line 866: Siitä ei pääse kuin Rudolf Hessin hissillä.

    ellauri022.html on line 938: Khosrow ja Shirin ( persiaksi: خسرو و شیرین) on persialaisen runoilijan Nizami Ganjavin (1141–1209), joka kirjoitti myös Laylan ja Majnunin, kuuluisan traagisen romanssin nimi. Se kertoo pitkälle kehitetyn fiktiivisen version tarinasta Sasanian kuninkaan Khosrow II: n rakkaudesta Armenian prinsessa Shiriniin, josta tulee Persian kuningatar. Olennainen kertomus on persialaista alkuperää oleva rakkaustarina, joka tunnettiin jo suuresta eepos-historiallisesta runosta Shahnameh ja muista persialaisista kirjailijoista ja suosituista tarinoista, ja muissa teoksissa on sama otsikko.
    ellauri022.html on line 959: Shahnameh sisältää kuuluisan persialaisen rakkaustarinan. Kuvanveistäjä named Farhad rakastuu Shirinin kanssa ja siitä tulee Khosrown rakkauskilpailija. Khosrow ei voi välttää Farhadia, joten hän lähettää hänet maanpakoon Behistun vuorelle, jonka mahdoton tehtävä on kaivertaa portaita kallioon. Farhad aloittaa tehtävänsä toivoen että Khosrow antaa hänen mennä naimisiin Shirinin kanssa. Khosrow lähettää sanansaattajan Farhadiin ja antaa hänelle vääriä uutisia Shirinin kuolemasta. Kuultuaan tämän väärän uutisen Farhad heittäytyy pois vuoren huipulta ja kuolee.
    ellauri023.html on line 47: Oli se aika päivästä, jolloin taivaan tulipallo hehkuvimmin polttaa ja ilma on hiostavan kuuma. Ei tee mieli ulos eikä siellä ulkona kukaan suostu olemaankaan omasta halustaan; on keskipäivä ja siestan aika. Sisällä huoneessa on vilpoista, vähän raukaiseekin Kaarlon höpinä, mutta me keskustelemme. Tulee puhetta lähetyskentän oloista, huonosta kentästä, maan oudoista laeista (Moosexen 10 käskyä) ja säännöstelymääräyxistä (ei sikaa). On rähistävä juutalaisille virkamiehille ja kuitenkin vaellettava kristittynä. Osattava pitää oikea jännite, ettei tule impedanssi mismatchia.
    ellauri023.html on line 155: Olli sulkee paskiaisen kellariin ja lounastaa sen rähistessä siellä muina miehinä.

    ellauri023.html on line 247: Toisexi parhaan potretin saa kirjan pahis äitipuoli, joka on yhtä ehta perkele hiilihankoineen. Muut on sit jo ohkasia pahvikuvia. Motiiveja ja puolustuxia ei ole, kaikki vaan ovat sellaisia kuin ovat, toteuttavat niille määrättyä kohtaloa. ovat syntisiä tai etenevät kohti pelastusrengasta, sen mukaan mikä nalli niille napsahtaa. Niinkuin myyteissä, saduissa ja uskonnossa yleensä.


    ellauri023.html on line 276: Näitä samanlaisia melko puolueellisia henkilökohtaisia ihmeitä tuli sitten Kaarlon tielle useita, enkeleitä ilmestyi ja pelasi asioita Kaarlon pussiin, monen vähemmän armoitetun vahingoxi. Sitähän se on luvatun kansankin historia, yhdelle luvataan hyvää, joka kylmän rauhallisesti otetaan toisilta. Mitäs palvovat vääriä kuvia. Pitää kazoa mihin suuntaan kumartaa ja mihin pyllistää. Vähän sellaista teodikeaa.
    ellauri023.html on line 309: Talo kalliolla on komea, vähän Rauhista nuorempi. Sauna oli alunperin

    ellauri023.html on line 446: Rouva Kaukon sisko Maire asui ja rähisi Nyyrikintiellä kunnes kuoli sekin.
    ellauri023.html on line 464: ja heitteli virveliä meidän laiturilta saunan rannassa. Saarinen vakoili ja kauhisteli.

    ellauri023.html on line 496: No saman miniän perintörahoilla rakennettiin 60-luvulla uusi sauna, joka oli rauhislaisten hallinnassa

    ellauri023.html on line 578: Oliko Aarne homo, ahisteliko se tyttöopiskelijoita? Oliko se kokkare? Sitä varmasti. Jotain mätää siinäkin takuulla oli. Kaikissa sioissa on pikkuisen likaa.
    ellauri023.html on line 672: Although the Greeks and Romans typically scorned Egyptian animal-headed gods as bizarre and primitive (Anubis was mockingly called "Barker" by the Greeks), Anubis was sometimes associated with Sirius in the heavens and Cerberus and Hades in the underworld. In his dialogues, Plato often has Socrates utter oaths "by the dog" (kai me ton kuna), "by the dog of Egypt", and "by the dog, the god of the Egyptians", both for emphasis and to appeal to Anubis as an arbiter of truth in the underworld.
    ellauri023.html on line 683: So what? Mitä shokeeraavaa siinä on? Mix kauhistellaan tämmösiä "x on vaan y" mietelmiä? Eihän ne muuta asioita mixikään. Ja tää on vielä Kansan Uutisista. Herran pelko on kiinni kansassa kuin kärpäspaperi. Koska niistä päätellään salaa eteenpäin: jos sielu on vaan harmoniaa, mites käy mulle jatkossa? Enxmä ookkaan kuolematon? Katoanko kuin löyhkä, kuin pieru Saharaan? Huolestuttavaa. Tai mikä pahempaa: jos anoppi on vaan joku konglomeraatti, eikös panna se tehosekottimeen? Apinat on kuin koiria, ei ne ymmärrä sanoja, ne kuuntelee äänensävyä.
    ellauri023.html on line 726: Gaius Mucius Cordus, better known with his later cognomen Scaevola was an ancient Roman youth, possibly mythical, famous for his bravery.
    ellauri023.html on line 728: In 508 BC, during the war between Rome and Clusium, the Clusian king Lars Porsena laid siege to Rome. Gaius Mucius Cordus, with the approval of the Roman Senate, sneaked into the Etruscan camp with the intent of murdering Porsena. Since it was the soldiers' pay day, there were two similarly dressed people, one of whom was the king, on a raised platform speaking to the troops. This caused Mucius to misidentify his target, and he killed Porsena's scribe by mistake. After being captured, he famously declared to Porsena: "I am Gaius Mucius, a citizen of Rome. I came
    ellauri023.html on line 732: Mucius thrust his right hand into a fire which was lit for sacrifice and held it there without giving any indication of pain, thereby earning for himself and his descendants the cognomen Scaevola, meaning "left-handed". Porsena was shocked at the youth's bravery, and dismissed him from the Etruscan camp, free to return to Rome, saying "Go back, since you do more harm to yourself than me". At the same time, the king also sent ambassadors to Rome to offer peace.
    ellauri023.html on line 736: The story of Mucius inspired a punishment in Rome's Colosseum for condemned prisoners where they would be forced to reenact this tale.
    ellauri023.html on line 819: pääpahis, joka on patriarkaalinen pahansuopa kaikkien pahisten isoisä,

    ellauri023.html on line 822: Miehistä ei ole mihinkään paizi pahixixi. Pahixet (paizi Ren,

    ellauri023.html on line 829: Pääpahis ei hoida hampaita, vaikka se on upporikas ja sillon taikavoimia.
    ellauri023.html on line 859: vaatteet päällä. Onko se nyt jotenkin pahismaisen myyssistä? Hyvät nykyään

    ellauri023.html on line 890: Kai Rispa ja Vinda pelastettiin ennenkuin pahisristeilijä räjähti?

    ellauri023.html on line 910: vaikka se on pahisvainaan lapsenlapsi, siis Palanderi. Ottakaa siitä oppia mamut!
    ellauri023.html on line 1195: Ei tietenkään. Riita on tulossa. - Kuka ratkaisee mikä kirjallisuus on tärkeää? - Rakkaani, sen saa ize ratkaista. - Mistä tiedät et tää kirja on ei ole tärkeä, kun et ole lukenut? - Koska siinä ei puhuta Määlärin seudun saastumisesta, rotuongelmista eikä nälästä. Nää on tärkeitä ja keskeisiä ongelmia. - Eikö ihmisen yxinäisyys ja rakkaudentarve ole tärkeitä? - Tietenkin, kultaseni, mixi olet niin hyökkäävä! - Koska tuputat vaan sun omia juttuja, tästä sinun tulee pitää ja tämä tehdä ja se sinun on luettava ja se on tyhmää ja se on taantumuxellista ja tuo on kapitalismia ja tuo on sosialismia... - Kuulee että Agnes on ollut asialla, sanoo Jacob jäätävästi. Agnes on porvarillinen lukion opettaja, kukkahattutäti, peukuttaa historiallista näkemystä ja väljähtynyttä vanhaa liberalismia.
    ellauri024.html on line 261: Tiimiajattelu jyllää hoblan etusivulla, joka kylläkään ei ole ekana, siinä on mainoxia. Mainos on päivän pääuutinen. Meidän tiimi kauhistelee koronavirusta, johon on kuollut koko maailmassa kourallinen väkeä, koska se on riski meidän tiimille.
    ellauri024.html on line 266: Ruokakuskifirman tunnuslause on "aikaa elämälle". Noin kolme sekuntia, jos juoxet portaat, pakkaat ja lukizet pyörän sairaan nopeesti. Mut älä sairastu, se on no show, putoot batchista. Kulit on enimmäxeen värivammasia mamuja ajelemassa ruosteisella kotterolla. Törkeetä riistoa, Marx näkis punaista ja Engels kalpenisi kauhusta. Mut niitä ei kukaan kuuntele, näähän ei ole työläisiä vaan pienyrittäjiä. Oman elämänsä seppoja.
    ellauri024.html on line 274: Joo tiedän, olen sanonut tän ennenkin (pientä kritiikkiä). Mitä väliä! Toisto tyylikeinona. Toistaahan historiakin izeään.
    ellauri024.html on line 293: Wolt on suomalainen pahisfirma, mutta vielä pahempi on Foodora. Eikä ihme, siellä on entiset nazit ruorissa. Niillä on pakkotyön reseptit vielä tuoressa muistissa. Arbeit macht frei.
    ellauri024.html on line 441: Mies tulee räkänokasta vaan ei turhan naurajasta. Onko Aarne räkänokka vai turhan nauraja? Räkättäähän se toisille, muttei turhan päiten. Kyllä siinä on aina joku tosi paikka takana. Niinkuin sen ihailemalla Puovo Huovikolla. Toinen koomillinen tosikko. Kun Arska puhuu huumormiehistä se ajattelee izeään.
    ellauri024.html on line 578: Rosvo mikä päällikkö. Joopa joo, vaikeeta on erottaa tyylirikkoja merkityxistä, huonoa viziä pahoista ajatuxista. Reilumpaa ois olla yrittämättäkään, sana 'mauton' on luokkasodan tylsä astalo. Antikommunisti Arska on pyhissä kysymyxissä ihan tosikko. Ryssäviha ei ole naurun asia. Vois sanoo suomalaista taistelijaa noin ehkä joskus niinku hyvässä mielessä rosvopäälliköx, esim Santeri Ivalo Juho Vesaista, mut et Rossi Talvelaa, se ei oo vaan tyylitöntä, se on rienausta, pyhäinhäväistys. Arskassa on persua, vaikkei sotiemme veteraanix ehtinyt. Arska ize voisi tolleen jollekin kenraalille silleen virkeästi mutta kunnioittavasti vizailla, mutta että luokkavihollinen Rossi, se on jo liian paxua.
    ellauri024.html on line 625: Koko ajan tulee vastaan uusia antiikin mytologian julkkishahmoja. Tän kun vielä lisää ilmielävien tai ilmikuolleiden kirjailijoiden ja muiden historian julkkisten setvimiseen, ei työstä tule loppua. Yx vie toiseen ja se kolmanteen, mä exyn tähän naamarien paljouteen. Onnex onnex en ole tähän tarttunut ennenkuin nyt, kun on enemmän aikaa ihmissuhteille. Kaikki aikahan tähän nyt menee, eikä riitäkkään.
    ellauri024.html on line 678: Pär Lagerkvist on ikävän oloinen ruåzalainen, nobelisti kotikenttäedulla. Pietistikodista ja virsikirjasta liian pian Darwiniin ja Marxiin pusakan kääntänyt hyyppä, joka itki loppuelämän omaa ja muiden pahuutta, ahisti kun ei ollut enää jumalaa antamassa satikutia ja sitte anteexi, älä enää koskaan tee niin. Hyvin ikävä aivoknääpiö. Ei ihme et Archie tuntee lukkarin rakkautta sen samannimisen kirjan kääpiöön. Se on itekkin kaiken naureskelun takana tollanen kolea synkän armoton kolmannen Moosexen kirjan Mooses. Ingmar Bergmanissa on tota samaa. Langenneita prematurely lauenneita enkeleitä, pikeentyneitä pietistejä, masokristillisiä. Koittasivat päättää: olis joko entisvanhaan tapaan kilttejä ja kunnollisia tukat suittuna, tai sit iloisia ilkeitä ja kampaamattomia ilman omantunnontuskia, eikä tollasia angstaavia vellihousuja. Tää on vanhan ajan modernismia.
    ellauri024.html on line 686: Komiikka vetää puoleensa niitä, jotka istuvat kazomossa tarkkailemassa lähimmäisiään - teatterissa, elokuvissa, kottona TV:n ääressä, puiston penkillä, junissa, autoissa, lentokoneissa, tuvan penkillä, kaikkialla missä ihmisiä liikkuu. Mutta se kauhistuttaa niitä jotka joutuvat olemaan tarkkailtavina, kuka missäkin näytelmässä. Ainoa turva on tietämättömyys, ettei tiedä tai välitä tietää, miltä minä ize näytän.

    ellauri024.html on line 714: Apinalle ominainen on Arskan kuningasajatus että pahisten tappiosta ilostelu ei oisikaan vahingoniloista eikä halpamaista. Totta kai se on. Sehän se vasta onkin. Ei komiikka kaunistu tekemällä omista arvoista absoluutteja. Sitäkin on yritety tuhannesti huonolla menestyxellä. Elämä vaan on tällästä rumankaunista. Aina samaa juonta sahaa Ankat. Joskus hyvää joskus pahaa Ankat.
    ellauri024.html on line 806: Lauri Viita kirjoitti ja puhui neroudesta, tarkoittaen izeään. Niinkuin Arska huumormiehistä. Mulla ne on narsistit. Late oli kateellinen Väpille: Minua ilikeettää niin perkeleesti! Tuollaista textiä minä kirjoittaisin ziljoonia sivuja! Ihailihan Arska Laten neroa aikansa, mutta kyllästyi loputtomaan paasauxeen, kun ei saanut ize puheenvuoroa. Niinkuin Ailakin, Viita sekosi. Arska juoruilee. Niin minäkin. Ämmättimet laulaa.
    ellauri024.html on line 866: Kirkkoon on koottu oikeistopopulistien viides kolonna, jota kaiken maailman persupaskiaiset hätäisenä ohjastaa: käykää ahdistamaan vasemmistopaavia. Kaivetaan vaikka se vanha nazipaavi naftaliinista. Juutalaiset otetaan taas messiin nitistämään rotinkaisten johtajaa. Jeesuxen historia toistaa izeään.
    ellauri024.html on line 1010: Tiesi miehistöstä jokainen

    ellauri024.html on line 1025: Nyt kun Pamela on herrahississä,

    ellauri024.html on line 1134: Nyt ääneen pääsi joku vasemmistolainen historioizija

    ellauri024.html on line 1206: Flateyn saari ja Flateyjarbók on kai oikeita, ellei Wikipediakin ole mukana vedätyxessä. Vähän epäilyttää, historia on näät islannixi saaga. Tanskalaiset osti kirjan 1651 joltain saarelaiselta maatontilla ja palautti sen 1971. Ois pitänyt ukki Kallekustaa Xn pölliä se meille, kun kävi Köpixessä jääkeleillä 1658. Oishan se kulkenut vaikka satulalaukussa.
    ellauri024.html on line 1358: Mestarillisexi aatehistoriallisexi esseexi kehuttu Tiedon puu vastustaa rationalistista optimismia ja antirationalistista pessimismiä. Muunlaista pessimismiä ei olekaan. von Wright huomauttaa, että tieto on yhtä lailla onnen ja onnettomuuden väline. Syvällistä. Kuin lukisi jostain sianhoito-oppaasta että sikaa voi rapsuttaa vasemmalla kädellä, oikealla kädellä tai molemmilla käsillä.
    ellauri025.html on line 104: St. Thomas was a vocal supporter of the death penalty. This was based on the theory (found in natural moral law), that the state has not only the right, but the duty to protect its citizens from enemies, both from within, and without. Aquinas advocated the death penalty for obstinate heretics.
    ellauri025.html on line 110: Toward the end of his life, he had a vision that forced him to drop his pen. Though he had experienced visions for years, this was something different. His secretary begged him to start writing again, but Aquinas replied, "I cannot. Such things have been revealed to me that what I have written seems but straw. Another prophet will come after me who is bigger yet, name of Maxim Gorki."
    ellauri025.html on line 160: Fantasiakirjailija Robert E. Howard yhdisti sankarinsa Conanin kimmerialaisiin näiden mystisen ja raa'an maineen takia. Howardin fiktiiviset kimmerialaiset kuitenkin ovat fiktiivisten kelttien esivanhempia, eikä heillä ole historiallisten kimmerialaisten kanssa mitään muuta yhteistä kuin nimi.
    ellauri025.html on line 162: Kimmerialaiset hävisivät historiasta Keski-Aasiasta tulleiden skyyttien valloitettua heidän maansa.
    ellauri025.html on line 463: Ensimmäinen Lauri Sivu eli Larry Page oli brittilaulaja 50-luvulla, oikealta nimeltään Leonard Davies. Page tried to magnify his fame through the wearing of unusually large spectacles, as "Larry Page the Teenage Rage". As of the 2000s, Page has been living in Avoca Beach, New South Wales, Australia. Onkohan siltäkin housut palaneet kuten kenguru- ja koalaväestöltä. Sen silmälasit saatto olla isot 50-luvulla, mut kyllä Larry Kakkosen 80-luvun TV-lasit lyö sen laudalta.
    ellauri025.html on line 643: Lovecraft is a famous writer and bullshit artist, but also a well-known racist. Should I read his novels?Was H.P. Lovecraft ever a chill or a good guy at least even a little bit? I know his works basically put humankind to the lowest of the low, but was there even a tiny bit of good in him?What does H.P. Lovecraft mean with his phrase “That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even death may die” in his writing of The Nameless City?
    ellauri025.html on line 648: Lovecraft is best known for his creation of a body of work that became known as the Cthulhu Mythos.
    ellauri025.html on line 665: koska Emmy ei tiennyt eikä edes välittänyt kuulla sen surullista raiskaushistoriaa. Se saattoi ajatella olevansa joku muu.
    ellauri026.html on line 104: Rapukka (Lönnrot): en liten kräfta. Sommarhemin Finnträskistä tuli varsinkin alkuvuosina rapukoita merralla. Niin kuulemma Huitilanjoestakin, vaikka ei pitkään aikaan ole edes koettu. Rapukkakesteihin (kräftskiva tulee pöytälevystä) ostetaan valmiit ravut Mustasta Pekasta. Majalaiset ostaa lisäxi hirmu määrän pakastettuja täplärapuja, jotka Niklaxen on kaikki syötävä näyttääxeen rauhislaisille mistä kana kusee. Onkohan se se sama kana joka voi pamahtaa. Typerrä kana.
    ellauri026.html on line 167: Kulttuurivihkojen Studio e-ohjelman aiheena 16.1.17 oli yliopistot ja demokratia. Oikeushistorian professori Jukka Kekkonen totesi vuonna 2010 voimaan tulleen
    ellauri026.html on line 202: Alaviite Kiimainen munkki-meemin avataareja: isät Roshi, Cohen, Mefodi, Rabelais, Abelard, Antonius, Matka länteen-kirjan apina. Näitähän on vaikka kuinka monta. Kiimainen ja munkki on lähisynonyymejä. Hakusanoilla kiimainen+munkki tulee vain pornovideoita. Hakusanoilla munkki+kiusaus oli tämä ensimmäinen osuma:
    ellauri026.html on line 216: and upon him sweet sleep fell upon his eyelids,
    ellauri026.html on line 219: In Greek the internal rhymes are especially beautiful, and draw attention to the line: “negretos, hedistos, thanato anchista eoikos.”
    ellauri026.html on line 222: A sound sweet sleep fell on his eyes, like death;
    ellauri026.html on line 225: The idea is there, but all the lingering emphasis in the original has been smoothed away. This, too, unfortunately, is typical of the whole. I have said that Wilson’s translation reads easily, and it does, like a modern novel: at shockingly few points does one ever need to stop and think. There are no hard parts; no difficult lines or obscure notions; no aesthetic arrest either; very little that jumps out as unusual or different. Wilson has set out, as she openly confesses, to produce an Odyssey in a “contemporary anglophone speech,” and this results in quite a bit of conceptual pruning. If you wait for the “Homeric tags,” the phrases that contained so much Greek culture they have been quoted over and over again by Greeks ever since—well, you are apt to miss them as they go by. A famous one occurs in book 24, when Odysseus and Telemachus are about to go into battle together: Odysseus tells Telemachus not to disgrace him, and Telemachus boasts that he need not fear. Laertes, Odysseus’s father, exclaims (Wilson’s translation), “Ah, gods! A happy day for me! My son and grandson are arguing about how tough they are!”
    ellauri026.html on line 227: This is a famous line, but here it would hardly seem to merit its fame—who cares about people “arguing about how tough they are”? The word here translated as “tough” just happens to be one of the central words of Hellenic thought: arete, “virtue” or “excellence,” that subject of so many subsequent philosophy lectures—whose learnability or unlearnability Plato made the subject of inquiry, and which Aristotle defined as a mean between two vices. The word can be used to mean something like “bravery,” but it is wildly broader and richer than “how tough one is” (there is a queen named Arete in the poem, but Wilson refrains from translating her as “Queen Tough”). The line was quoted over and over again in later days because it was considered the height of happiness for a man to have a son and grandson competing with each other to possess virtue or true excellence. This Wilson suppresses, as a thing irrelevant to contemporary idiom—“toughness” will have to serve in its place.
    ellauri026.html on line 253: Mut onx se oikeesti hauska, vai vaanko tollanen "kaskun kärki lienee siinä" puujalkanikkari? Alku kuulostaa aika pahalta: mikään ei ole sopimattomampaa kuin panna vakavia asioita halvalla, mutta leikkiä saa toki laskea turhista jutuista. Ikäänkuin ruoskia kuollutta konia. Erasmus pitää tarkkaan huolen ettei kukaan loukkaannu, jättäen mainizematta ketään nimeltä (mut silti pelkäs että paavi saattaa suuttua). Mut paavi tyytyi vaan hohottamaan muiden mukana.
    ellauri026.html on line 290: Opettaessaan myöhemmin Pariisissa Erasmus ohjasi 21-vuotiasta englantilaista oppilasta nimeltä Thomas Grey, josta tuli Dorsetin markiisi. Erasmus sai lentopotkut yritettyään lähennellä Greytä. Erasmus kuumui heteromiehistä.
    ellauri026.html on line 372: On sellasia pytagoralaisia, joille kaikki on niin yhteistä et ne ottaa mitä vaan messiin mekon alla, ne ei tee siitä isompaa numeroa kuin jos ne olis perintökamoja. Toiset on vaan olevinaan rikkaita, ja tää kuvitelma riittää niille onnexi. Joillakuilla on hienot talot Helsingissä ja sen vuoxi pihistelee mökillä. Jotkut panee menee kaiken samantien, toiset kerää kokoon hyvällä tai pahalla. Yx ährää kerätäxeen julkkismainetta, toinen makaa nokisena uunin takana. A great many undertake endless suits and outvie one another who shall most enrich the dilatory judge or corrupt advocate. One is all for innovations and another for some great he-knows-not-what. Another leaves his wife and children at home and goes to Jerusalem, Rome, or in pilgrimage to St. James´s where he has no business. In short, if a man like Menippus of old could look down from the moon and behold those innumerable rufflings of mankind, he would think he saw a swarm of flies and gnats quarreling among themselves, fighting, laying traps for one another, snatching, playing, wantoning, growing up, falling, and dying. Nor is it to be believed what stir, what broils, this little creature raises, and yet in how short a time it comes to nothing itself; while sometimes war, other times pestilence, sweeps off many thousands of them together.
    ellauri026.html on line 384: Mut hei mähän oisin hölmöin kaikista, Demokritos osoittelis mua sormella, jos jatkaisin tätä tavisten luetteloa pitempään. Etenen siis korkeakoulutettuihin pelleihin, niihin jotka luulee olevansa fixuja mut on ihan yhtä pönttöjä. Niiden joukossa on paalupaikalla lingvistit, joita surkeampia ei ole kyllä kukaan, kaikki niitä vihaavat, besserwissereitä tuhnuja. Ne kukkoilevat tiedoillansa kouluissa - sanoinko kouluissa? Luostareissa paremminkin, tai teurastamoissa, koulukodeissa - vanhenevat siellä keltanokkain keskellä, metelissä ja homeen lemussa, silti luulee olevansa jengin parhaita, pelottelee opiskelijoita kelalla ja aikarajoilla, muilla virtuaalikepeillä ja porkkanoilla, lampaina hiiviskelee sutten pikkutakeissa. Viihtyy niin mainiosti ettei menis eläkkeelle ollenkaan, jatkavat vaan "tutkimusta" eläkkeellä muka "kiireisinä." Paukuttavat opiskelijoiden päähän jotain vanhentuneita nixejä, joilla raukat sitten turhaan ezii pestejä. Ihan onnesta puikeena jos saa selvillle, kuka oli Ankhiseen äidin kummin kaima, tai löytää jonkun ammoin kuolleen kielen sanavainaan jostain homeisesta kivestä: ahaa, mentula tarkoittaakin kullia.
    ellauri026.html on line 392: Ja sit on nää tietokirjailijat hyötykirjoineen, karvaisine viittoineen ja naavapartoineen esim Klinge, Wahlroos, Enkvist ja Valtaoja, jotka ovat olevinaan ainoita viisaita miehiä, muut vaan statisteja. Esittelevät keximiään mahdottomia mahdollisia maailmoja ja historian käänteitä, selvittävät kaikki markkinoiden ilmiöiden syyt ja seurauxet, ihan kuin ne olis luonnon kirjanpitäjiä tai sihteerejä, tai jostain taivaasta pudonneita sanansaattajia. Luonto nauraa niille koko matkan geenipankkiin. Ne ei tiedä mitään, on keskenäänkin aivan eri mieltä. Esittelee ensimmäisiä syitä, mityyxiä ja tämyyxiä kuin S. Albert Kivis-vainaja. (KOO)
    ellauri026.html on line 444: Ephraim Emerton, Erasmuxen elämäkerturi, oli harras unitariaani, protestanttien protestantti, kristinuskon islamisti. Jeppe ei ole jumala, ei edes puolikas, eikä Pyhis pistänyt sitä sisään neizeeseen. Allah on ainoa kukko tunkiolla.


    ellauri026.html on line 451: Fiman väritetystä historiikista käy entistä selvemmäx että koko protestanttiliike oli yxityisomistuxen kapinaa valtio-omistusta vastaan. Paavi oli kommari niinkuin Jesse, toteutti taivaan suunnitelmataloutta. Nyt oli talousliberaali trendi liikkeellä, uskonvapauden nimessä. Hararikin totesi että uskon päätarkoitus on luottokelpoisuus. Uskonpuhdistus oli vitun pankkireformi. Pientä luottoa ize kullekin suoraan Jeesuxelta ilman välikäsiä et saa ize yrittää. Notmiiden territorioiden possessio ja industrialismi oli jumalan uusia suuria lupauxia luvatulle kansalle. Luppoovoo, hieroo Pekka setä käsiään.
    ellauri026.html on line 455: His activity took many forms; but he was always, whether through classical treatise or encyclopædic collection or satirical dialogue or direct moral appeal—always and everywhere, the preacher of righteousness. His successes were invariably along this line. His failures were caused by his incapacity to perceive at what moment the mere appeal to the moral sense was no longer adequate.
    ellauri026.html on line 457: Leukavasti laukaistu Jefa. Ei uskonpuhistuxessa ollut kyse mistään hurskailusta, jos ikinä, täs on suuremmat voimat liikkeellä. Markkinavoimat liikahtelevat. Ahneus herää, moraali juoxee kieli vyön alla perässä. Odotellaan Mandevilleä ja joulupukkia, äidin mekossa on kukkia.
    ellauri026.html on line 471: Renessanssissa oli aurinko tullut pilvestä, taloudellinen kasvu vauhissa, raha valui siirtomaista laareihin, tuntui että ehkä hyvät voimat sittenkin on ruorissa.
    ellauri026.html on line 493: Jefa ei ole huomaavinaan Eran homorakkautta nuoreen ystäväänsä Rogeriin. Eihän tämmösestä sovi jumaluusopin professorin olla selvillä, saati sitten siitä puhua. Homofoobit on aika usein kaappihomoja. (Tässä mun täytyy taas vähän karistella epäluuloja: emmä ole homofoobinen, mun parhaissa kavereissakin on vasenkätisiä. Musta on vaan kiva puhua asioista joista jotkut kauhistuu. Se on osa koko tän runoelman pointtia: mix kauhistua luonnonilmiötä, mix koittaa olla niin suu muikulla p.c. Naturalia non sunt turpia. Kaikesta ei tarvi pitää, muttei tarvi sentään pöyristyä.)
    ellauri026.html on line 508: An article by the late Dr. R. Fruin, which came to my knowledge after the completion of the manuscript, quite confirms my view of the utter untrustworthiness of Erasmus´ accounts of his early life.
    ellauri026.html on line 509: Of more recent biographies, that of R. B. Drummond is, all things considered, the best; careful and serious, but showing the almost universal tendency to take Erasmus at his word, even while admitting his incapacity to tell the truth.
    ellauri026.html on line 510: Froude's Life and Letters illustrates the author's familiar qualities,—his remarkable distinctness of view and his complete indifference to accuracy of detail.
    ellauri026.html on line 595: Mielestäni en ole setämiehistä kaikkein naisvihaisin,

    ellauri028.html on line 89: Initially, a surviving one of his daughters, Clara Clemens, objected to its publication in March 1939, probably because of its controversial and iconoclastic views on religion, claiming it presented a "distorted" view of her father. Henry Nash Smith helped change her position in 1960. Clara explained her change of heart in 1962 saying that "Mark Twain belonged to the world" and that public opinion had become more tolerant. (Ehkä se myös tarvizi vähän pätäkkää leivän syrjäxi.) She was also influenced to release the papers by her annoyance with Soviet reports that her father's ideas were being suppressed in the United States. (Ei Laika ole ainut koira radalla. Vuosi 1962 oli Kuuban kriisi, kylmä sota kuumeni. Popovin nuhruista mutta optimistista nuoruutta.) The papers were selected, edited and sequenced for the book in 1939 by Bernard DeVoto. (Sota tuli väliin, jumala piti varmistaa voittajien puolelle. No ainahan se on voittajien puolella. Tai sit se haluu antaa opetuxen tai sillä on joku ovelampi suunnitelma mielessä.)
    ellauri028.html on line 95: Ihmetellessään taivaskuvitelman tylsyyttä Make huomauttaa aivan oikein, et se FUCK! FUCK on elukoiden kolmesta tavotteesta kaikkein mieluisin, eli mix pitää ne perseet jehovan taivaassa nimenomaan tervata? Mä on ajatellut tykönäni (ihan izexeni vain, siteerataxeni Jori Malmstenia) että #metoon kannalta se iso virhe jumalalta (Darwinista en sano mitään ettei se suutu) oli, että elukat pitää päämääränänsä nimenomaan panoa, eikä läheskään niin paljon lasten tekoa. (Kai se johtuu siitä, että lasten tulo on elukoille liian etäinen ja abstrakti päämäärä, sitä ei hevin saa koodatuxi liskoaivoihin.) Nimittäin siitä justiinsa seuraa kaikki nää #metoo väärinkäytöxet: pannaan alaikäisiä, pannaan vastahakoisia, yhtään edes miettimättä edistääkö se puuhastelu onnellista perhettä. Pääasia et tuntuu pippelistä kivalta ja pääsee kyykyttämään naisia. Suunnittelufiba miehissä. Takaisin piirustuslaudalle jehova! Vaan näyttäähän se pelittävän näinkin, tuumaa jumala ja Darwin miehissä. If it ain't broken, don't fix it. Let good enough alone. Paras on hyvän pahin vihollinen.
    ellauri028.html on line 106: During his prolific period Mark wrote many minor items, most of them rejected by Howells, and read extensively in one of his favorite books, Pepys' Diary. Like many another writer Mark was captivated by Pepys' style and spirit, and “he determined,” says Albert Bigelow Paine in his 'Mark Twain, A Biography', “to try his hand on an imaginary record of conversation and court manners of a bygone day, written in the phrase of the period. The result was 'Fireside Conversation in the Time of Queen Elizabeth', or as he later called it, '1601'.
    ellauri028.html on line 110: “It was my duty to keep buttons on his shirts,” recalled Katy Leary, life-long housekeeper and friend in the Clemens menage, “and he'd swear something terrible if I didn't. If he found a shirt in his drawer without a button on, he'd take every single shirt out of that drawer and throw them right out of the window, rain or shine—out of the bathroom window they'd go.
    ellauri028.html on line 112: It was sometimes a wonderful and fearsome thing to watch Mr. Clemens play billiards,” relates Elizabeth Wallace. “He loved the game, and he loved to win, but he occasionally made a very bad stroke, and then the varied, picturesque, and unorthodox vocabulary, acquired in his more youthful years, was the only thing that gave him comfort. Gently, slowly, with no profane inflexions of voice, but irresistibly as though they had the headwaters of the Mississippi for their source, came this stream of unholy adjectives and choice expletives."
    ellauri028.html on line 114: Words vulgar and offensive to other ears were a common language to him. Anyone who ever knew Mark heard him use them freely, forcibly, picturesquely in his unrestrained conversation. Whitman and the Bible are no more obscene than Nature herself—no more obscene than a manure pile, out of which come roses and cherries.
    ellauri028.html on line 130: that his soul consumes with wrath, to see the queen stooping
    ellauri028.html on line 131: to talk with such; and that the old man feels that his
    ellauri028.html on line 159: "Did you give this man two tablets every eight hours?" asks
    ellauri028.html on line 164: "Nurse, did you give this man one tablet every twelve hours?"
    ellauri028.html on line 169: "Nurse," asks the doctor, "did you prick his boil?"
    ellauri028.html on line 184: This was Twain's most serious, philosophical and private book. He kept it locked in his desk, considered it to be his Bible, and spoke of it as such to friends when he read them passages. He had written it, rewritten it, was finally satisfied with it, but still chose not to release it until after his death. It appears in the form of a dialogue between an old man and a young man who discuss who and what mankind really is and provides a new and different way of looking at who we are and the way we live. Anyone who thinks Twain was not a brilliant philosopher should read this book. We consider ourselves as free and autonomous people, yet this book puts forth the ideas that 1) We are nothing more than machines and originate nothing - not even a single thought; 2) All conduct arises from one motive - self-satisfaction; 3) Our temperament is completely permanent and unchangeable; and 4) Man is of course a product of heredity, and our future, being fixed, is irrevocable -- which makes life completely predetermined. If these points are true, then buying and reading this book is not in your control, but simply must be done because it was meant to be. If these points are not true you might still wish to make an independent decision to enjoy a thought-provoking book by a great and legendary writer.
    ellauri028.html on line 198: Apparently man is a selfish prick that can't think for himself and relies on "outside influences". He is a chameleon. He is nothing but a mere machine. Well, at least according to Twain. Man is a fraud and only lives for himself. He is really driving home this point that everyone is selfish and acts out of selfish needs (big surprise?), even if viewed (publicly and personally) as a self-sacrificing person. My question is; who cares? If the end result is the same, what does the actions matter. Let's say, saving a woman from a burning house. Twain says you do this out of making yourself feel good and avoiding the pain of not saving the woman, nothing else; the woman comes second to your own need of feeling good. But regardless of how it makes you feel, you still saved the woman in the end. The good is still done, even though you did it for yourself. Forget how the action was achieved. What does it matter if we refer to this as "self sacrificing" or "selfishness". Answer me this question, Twain! THE ACTION REMAINS THE SAME!!!.... I feel this must have been written during a time when everyone was going around smugly proclaiming to be self-sacrificing do-gooders and self-proclaimed religious nuts while really being shitty people; which had to be the most annoying thing ever. I guess it feels a bit outdated and I think people who naively go around claiming that they are "self-sacrificing do-gooders" are simply laughed at in our post modern times as smug assholes who need to get off their high horse (high horse? who owns a fucking horse nowadays, anyways?). I feel it is pretty accepted now that those who do good are doing them for their own selfish gains and the view of acceptance by others, at least I think this is the case. I don't know cause I don't know do-gooders, everyone I know (including myself) are dicks and more concerned with their celluar phones and creating social dating websites on the internet in vain attempts to pick up chicks only to drink alone and desperately spend several hours harassing women on social dating sites until one, out of pity, decides to respond to your 50 private messages, which then they foolishly decides to set up a date with you; only for you to be disappointed and stood up; which results in more drinking and paying a "dancer" to give you a hand job behind the goodwill on a Saturday night....
    ellauri028.html on line 200: Anyways, I feel "What is Man?" is really a precursor to Freud (also Dostoevsky and Nietzche are precursors) and the Ego, which is pretty impressive for the time, but again, it feels a bit dated. He is also repetitive about the same idea of man being selfish, which is annoying like this review...
    ellauri028.html on line 202: Now he is on this kick about how man never thinks for himself. He is a chameleon conforming to whatever outside influences he puts himself in. This is pretty interesting stuff here. I apologize that these reviews have become rather flat. The amount of times I have used the word "interesting" to describe things in a vague manner is so blindly obvious and so boring, I can't believe I go on writing these things (and you keep reading them?!) Where is this going to get me, doing these shitty reviews? Does anyone care? Do I really care? I think I need a girlfriend (this is a cry for help)...Anyways, the book is psychological and philosophical or some shit... go read the goddamn thing yourself...I need a drink...
    ellauri028.html on line 203: Sorry about that last paragraph, anyways, this could be one of the most easily readable and most underrated philosophical books ever. This is a read that delves into some deep thinking. Triggers the mind. In fact, my mind just got triggered. Why don't I just stop doing these reviews publicly and require people to pay me for reviews rather than willingly exploit myself as cheap and free entertainment? Why do I feel I need to keep doing these reviews? I am cutting myself short! Perhaps I would get more satisfaction out of keeping these reviews to myself? I don't know, who am I kidding... This is not entertaining the least and no person in their right mind would ever pay a dime for this drivel...I need another drink...
    ellauri028.html on line 204: Jesus, I am sorry for this whole rant. This is a book review, not a therapy session...I guess I am having a bad day ...Sorry...This is all pathetic, this is all a very sad, sad self centered review...I have lost all my steam, as if I had much to begin with. Where did it all go wrong? When did it start? What has happened to me?
    ellauri028.html on line 207: Garbage... comparatively to the other works...skip this....
    ellauri028.html on line 212: Wow, just wow. Mark Twain is a Taoist? A God??? This book is a religious experience. Unreal?!?! I shit myself from reading it, unbelievable!!! Read these quotes. One of the best, one of the greats! He discusses Adam and Eve, oh, I can't stress how mind blowing this is...This is a turning-point of my life!!!!!!!
    ellauri028.html on line 213: Sorry, I was apparently drunk when I wrote this, disregard everything.
    ellauri028.html on line 220: Mark Twain says that man is an automaton, completely stirred by outside influences, but the main motive for his deeds is always that they please himself. That's no free will (hard determinism) and psychological egoism put together. I can't think of a nastier outlook on man. Better read his adventure books for kids. (less)
    ellauri028.html on line 224: Mark Twain said his idea which "human is only a machine "again and again at all. Actually i dont like this reputation. However, I love Mark Twain because he is Nikola Tesla's best friend.
    ellauri028.html on line 228: I picked this book for the 'what is man' essay. Though there are many profound philosophical ideas in it, they get sidelined by the authors racial slur on indigenous natives, Australian aborigines and Afro Americans. One might argue it was the trend those days, but I can't come to terms especially after reading other books on philosophy from that era.
    ellauri028.html on line 248: Maybe I'm just impatient, but I found this book tedious and more than a little depressing. Back on the virtual shelf it goes, for the time being.
    ellauri028.html on line 334: "Mademoiselle from Armentières" has roots in a tradition of older popular songs; its immediate predecessor seems to be the song "Skiboo" (or "Snapoo"), which was also popular among British soldiers of the Great War. Earlier still, the tune of the song is thought to have been popular in the French Army in the 1830s; at this time the words told of the encounter of an inn-keeper's daughter, named Mademoiselle de Bar le Duc, with two German officers. During the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, the tune was resurrected, and again in 1914 when the British and Allied soldiers got to know it.
    ellauri028.html on line 336: The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette of December 4, 1939, reported that the historical inspiration for the song had been a young Frenchwoman named Marie Lecoq (later Marie Marceau), who worked as a waitress at the Café de la Paix in Armentières at the time of the war. Despite the obscenity of many popular versions of the song, it was reportedly quite clean in its original form.
    ellauri028.html on line 338: "Mademoiselle from Armentières" was considered a risqué song and not for 'polite company', and when sung on the radio and TV, as in The Waltons, typically only the first verse was sung. The lyrics on which this opinion is based are recorded in the Gordon "Inferno" Collection.
    ellauri028.html on line 564: Odottelemme juuri parhaillaan eli täsmälleen tällä herran sekunnilla, tällä nimenomaisella hetkellä tai tällä kellonlyömällä odotamme Euroopan erikoisuuskirjeenvaihturimme Eino-Mies Porkka-Kosken raporttia reportaashshisarjaamme "Yhdentekevä Eurooppa". Kävelevä sinikantisemme uudisoi meille kohta Helsingin Pinaatintorilta suomalaisten sotavegetaarien 47:nnen teemaviikon paraatia. Aihehan on Eino-Miehelle erittäin tuttu. Mieshän on palvisodan vegetaareja. - Niin, hänhän sai palvisodassa Mannergeimilta neljännen luokan valkoisen ruusukaalin riparikunnan kunniamerkin. Sopan ja kauhan miehiä kerta kaikkiaan. Eikä siinä kaikki, Vuonna 55 hän oli reportterina seuraamassa Porkkanan luovutusta takaisin Suomelle. Toivottavasti hän ei ole tänä juhlallisena vegetaaripäivänä niin nakit silmillä, että joutuisimme taas kuulemaan sen iänikuisen baaritiskitarinan siitä, miten hän listi vielä välirauhaspäivänä 50 punajuuriarmeijan kaaleria itulinjassa paljain käsinein. - Herra jumala! Puhelinhan soi! Pane töpseli nopeasti seinään! Haloo haloo! Täällä alivaltiosihteeri! - Täällä Eino-Mies P-K tanassa ja Burana 200. Saisinko huonepalveluun, tarvizisin Burana 400:sta. Ja jos Suomesta soitetaan ja uzitaan, minua ei saa häiritä eikä vastustaa. Sanokaa vaikka, että minulla on Pipa kukkarossa ja Kippari-Calle taskussa.
    ellauri028.html on line 568: Sotuinvalidien puolustusvoimat järjesti sotuinvalidien syyskeräyxen koko maassa. Nyt julkistamme keräyxen tuloxen. Saimme kerättyä yhteensä 283 kokonaista sotuinvalidia ja osia. Se on 50% eli lähes puolet vähemmän kuin viime vuonna. Näistä 238 nyt vielä tuhisevaa sotuinvalidia (tai vähemmän) luovutetaan rahavallan resitentille Sale Hiiristölle izepäisyyspäivän sotuinvaliidivastaanotolla. Sotuinvalidien puolustusvoimat päällikkönsä sopuiluveteraani kunniaylisopuli Esa Saarisen nimissä haluaa kiittää koko Suomen kansaa, paizi Aira Samulinia, joka ei millään suostunut luovuttamaan vaatekomeroon kenkäläjän alle kätkemäänsä Peter Nygårdia.
    ellauri028.html on line 572: Jaaaha, meillä on täällä intiaaniteltassa sotilasmestari Karmei Enninen, tervetuloa. Paizi tehän olitte täällä ensin, anteexi. - No panic, siviili, lepo vaan, armeijassa ei pyydellä anteexi eikä ensinkään anneta, seuraa kurinpitotoimenpide, esim niskalaukaus. - Aaaha. Stm Kanninen, teiltä on juuri ilmestyny jyhkeä värikuvateos 101 asentoa. - Jes söör herra siviili! - Tässä kirjan takaliepeessä kunniaylisopuli E.Saarinen kehaisee, että tää on jatkoa kirjaanne 100 asentoa. - Niin, edellinen teos oli jymykukoistus, ja E.S. vaatimalla vaati jatko-osaa, tukijatketta ikäänkuin puuvillaisella vyöllä. Tää on jonkin verran rohkeampi kuin se esa. Suomalainen sotilas uskaltaa olla missä tahansa asennossa. Keittiön lattialla, takapenkillä, hississä, tiskipöydällä, parvekkeella, puuta vasten mezässä, junan vessassa... - Niin niin, ne on nähty, mitä uutta tässä painoxessa? No ei muuta kun tää 101. kuva ihan extrana: E.Saarinen epämukavan näköisessä vetelässä asennossa Pekka Himosen takana Pipsa Pallasvesan riippukeinussa. Pow-wow on päättynyt, ja nyt, saanko pyytää siviiliä tänne teltan taaxe... BLAM! BLAM!
    ellauri028.html on line 574: Täällä valtakunnantyhjäntoimittaja Esa-Jouni Reikä-Saarinen ja puolustusvoimien simulaattorihankinnat! Maamme p-voimat on päättänyt hankkia jalkaväen taistelusimulaattorin! Vauzi vauz! Ja se oon mä! Tupla vauz! Ei vaitiskaan, vizi vizi, pyydän anteexi. Läänineversti Karmei Enninen, olkaa hyvä, avaisitteko vielä vähän tätä? - Kiitos, ja anteexi että en sano kiitos, armeijassa ei sanota koskaan kiitos, anteexi tai ole hyvä, meillä se menee vaan: hommio! ja loppu! Täällä kannetaan vaan kaunaa, aseita ja arvomerkkejä. Simputetaan alaisia ja kannellaan esamiehistä toimivalle johdolle.
    ellauri028.html on line 741: An elderly couple is vacationing in the west. Bob always wanted a pair of authentic cowboy boots. Seeing some on sale one day, he buys them, wears them home, walking proudly. He walks into their hotel room and says to his wife, "Notice anything different, Helen?"
    ellauri028.html on line 749: Frustrated, Bob storms off into the bathroom, undresses, and walks back into the room completely naked, except for his boots.
    ellauri028.html on line 751: Again, he asks, a little louder this time, "Notice anything DIFFERENT?"
    ellauri029.html on line 352: In the 1990s, Kahneman's research focus began to gradually shift in emphasis towards the field of "hedonic psychology". This subfield is closely related to the positive psychology movement, which was steadily gaining in popularity at the time.
    ellauri029.html on line 358: It is difficult to determine precisely when Kahneman's research began to focus on hedonics, although it likely stemmed from his work on the economic notion of utility.
    ellauri029.html on line 549: ja tytöille mielikuvan miehistä ressukoina, jotka

    ellauri029.html on line 592: Ärisi, murisi, rähisi, huusi, heilutti käsiä

    ellauri029.html on line 695: Simon henkilöhistoria kuulostaa kyllä vähän narsistiselta, varsinkin ton pojan nimi Frans. Rosa ja Simo on jotenkin samannäköisiä, pikku peikkoja. Meriläinen on ollut avioliitossa ikätoverinsa toimittaja-tietokirjailija Tuomas Murajan kanssa lokakuusta 2017, ja heillä on uusperhe. Ei se Murajakaan ole ihan viaton, se on muuttanut nimensä Murajaxi Kainulaisesta. Entinen palkkasoturi, palkkatyötön (Sipilän perustulomarsu 2017-8). Rosa on jossain vihreiden suojatyöpaikassa. V. 2017 se kyllästyi sanoja kääntelevään Tampereen pikkumieheen ja muutti takas Helsinkiin.
    ellauri029.html on line 867: Ironian alalajeja ovat sokraattinen, dramaattinen, historiallinen ja tilanteeseen liittyvä ironia. Itseensä kohdistuvaa ivaa kutsutaan itseironiaksi.
    ellauri029.html on line 910: The question is, is satire or sarcasm ever appropriate? This would be easy enough to resolve if not for the fact that God uses satire in several places in Scripture. For example, Paul’s words in this passage:
    ellauri029.html on line 912: You are already filled, you have already become rich, you have become kings without us; and indeed, I wish that you had become kings so that we also might reign with you. For, I think, God has exhibited us apostles last of all, as men condemned to death; because we have become a spectacle to the world, both to angels and to men. We are fools for Christ’s sake, but you are prudent in Christ; we are weak, but you are strong; you are distinguished, but we are without honor. To this present hour we are both hungry and thirsty, and are poorly clothed, and are roughly treated, and are homeless; and we toil, working with our own hands; when we are reviled, we bless; when we are persecuted, we endure; when we are slandered, we try to conciliate; we have become as the scum of the world, the dregs of all things, even until now. 1 Corinthians 4:8-13

    ellauri029.html on line 914: Is Paul’s language ironic here? Absolutely. Was it hurtful? Intentionally so. Yet, because his intent was to lead the stubborn Corinthians to the truth, it can still be considered loving. In fact, Paul followed this passage with, "I do not write these things to shame you, but to admonish you as my beloved children."
    ellauri030.html on line 109: Kikhernekehoinen englannintaja (alla) kertoo Marcus Porcius Cato Censoriuxesta tarkemmin. Se syntyi tuskulumissaan Latiumissa ehkä 234 eKr ja kuoli ysärinä. Se oli ahnas plebeijinousukas. Perheen nimi oli Porcius (porsastelija? sikala?), lisänimi Cato tarkottaa kattia. Se oli varmaan jotenkin kissamainen, pitkäkyntinen rähisijä. Enemmän kuin Sapiens, millä nimellä se tunnettiin myöhemmin. Sillä oli vahvuuxia mutta vitusti myös vikoja. Sillä ei ollut mitään vuorisaarnan "autuaita ovat" ominaisuuxia, vaikka kovana käräjöijänä se varmaan ajatteli olevansa vanhurskas. Se oli todenpuhuja, suoraselkäinen, rohkea ja isänmaallinen, kiltti perheenisä kuten moni muukin nazi. Mutta se oli pihi saituri, hirveä styränki, paha vihollinen, ja pysyi poissa paheista vaan yleisön silmissä. Sitä ihannoitiin myöhemmin tyyppiroomalaisena, kai sen puutteet oli jo unohtuneet tai kuului asiaan.
    ellauri030.html on line 278: Ja nyt tulee taas Siiselin tilastollisia harhapäätelmiä. Kuten kaikki tietävät (ja ovat aina tienneet, tiesivät myös Ciceron aikana) vanhuxet ovat suhteellisen nyreitä, hankalia, ärtyisiä, ja saitoja. "Mutta näähän on luonnevikoja, ei johdu iästä". Hemmetti, luonnevikoja, mutta PALJON tavallisempia vanhoilla kuin nuoremmilla. Eikä ihme! Nimittäin! kuten Siiseli izekin toteaa, vanhuxia vähexytään, halvexitaan ja pilkataan, KOSKA ne on käppänöitä, heikkoja, hömelöitä, ja sen lisäxi vielä nyreitä, hankalia, ärtyisiä ja saitoja. Turha marssittaa taas muutamaa hämmästyttävää poikkeusta, nyt puhutaan tilastofaktoista! Cato ei "muka" ymmärrä vanhushappamuutta eikä varsinkaan saituutta, mix säästellä kun on niin vähän matkaa jäljellä? Hyvä kysyä, mutta historia kertoo, että Cato ize ei ainakaan ollut poikkeus, se oli varsinainen hapantelija ja itara kuin piru ihan loppuvihellyxeen asti. Hautas poikansakin kunnan kustannuxella, ja möi vanhat ja sairaat orjat torilla.
    ellauri030.html on line 555: Artturi oli äidille hyvin ikävä, syytti sitä isän onnettomuudesta, pihisti perintörahoja. Äiti inhos sen perrimismiä, röyhkeyttä ja komentelua. Se oli varmaan isänperintöä. Danzigin konkka tuli 1819 ja köyhdytti perhettä. Johanna ei huolinut Artun rahoja.
    ellauri030.html on line 740: Joku Francis Hutcheson jo huomautti 1750, että ei tää ole koko tarina. Voihan sitä nauraa muullekin kuin muille ihmisille, ei ole pakko olla aina pahanilkinen. (Vaik kyllä se varmaan naurattaa eniten.) Izellekin voi nauraa olematta pahantahtoinen. No se mun nauruteoria että normit naurattaa, onkin tässä suhteessa parempi. Nokkela toiminta on vielä yx naurun aiheuttaja, eikä siinäkään tarvi olla ketään pahista. Jonkinlaista helpotusta sekin on, kevennystä. Tästä päästäänkin huumorin kevennysteoriaan. Nauru on helpotusta, jonkinlaista hydraulista paineen päästöä. No helpotus kyllä usein naurattaa, ainakin helpottunutta. Ympärillä haistelijat ovat kriittisempiä. Tän selityxen esitti Lordi Shaftesbury 1709, kun höyrykone oli kexitty. Tää oli ensimmäinen essee missä huumori tarkoitti vaan jotain hassua. Jännää miten filosofiat muuttuu tekniikan edistyxen mukana. Spencer ja Freud myöhemmin korvas höyryn hermoenergialla, mutta pointti oli sama. Spencerin “On the Physiology of Laughter” (1911) sano et hermoenergia purskahtaa nauruxi kun tietty jännityskynnys on ylitetty. No oikeestaan vasta sitten kun se jännitys laukee vai mitä? Kun ei enää ole pakko pidättää, ja paineen voi päästää alenemaan. Energia tulee pakkautuneista sopimattomista tunteista. Kuten runossa:
    ellauri030.html on line 839: Filosofit on niin huumorittomia, että ne ei pysty erottamaan leikkitappelua oikeesta, ne lähtee heti tykittämään vastaan täysillä. No leikissä on totta toinen puoli, et jos tehdään pilaa vaikka homoista, blondeista, polakeista, nekruista, italiaanoista, lakimiehistä tai naisista, niin kyllä siinä on mukana aina oikeaakin ilkeyttä. Stanfordin sivusto uskaltautuu vetämään heikohkon puolalaisvizin, koska puolalaiset on niin sulautuneet jenkkeihin, ettei ne enää siitä pahastu. Six kai se vizikin on niin vetämätön. Huoh.
    ellauri030.html on line 888: Man is a rational animal — so at least I have been told. Throughout a long life, I have looked diligently for evidence in favor of this statement, but so far I have not had the good fortune to come across it, though I have searched in many countries spread over three continents” (1950, 71).

    ellauri030.html on line 905: Freud’s humoristic theory, like most of his ideas, was based on a dynamic among id, ego, and super-ego. Marx brothers like. The commanding superego likes to impede the ego from seeking pleasure for the id, or to momentarily adapt itself to the demands of reality, a mature coping method.
    ellauri030.html on line 906: Moreover, Freud (1960) followed Herbert Spencer's ideas of energy being conserved, bottled up, and then released like so much steam venting to avoid an explosion. Freud was talking about psychic or emotional energy, and this idea is now thought of as the relief theory of laughter.
    ellauri030.html on line 908: Later, Freud returned his attention to humor noting that not everyone is capable of formulating humor, including him.
    ellauri030.html on line 916: Tendentious humor involves a "victim", someone at whose expense we laugh. Non-tendentious humor does not require a victim. This innocuous humor typically depends on wordplay, and Freud believed it has only modest power to evoke amusement. Tendentious humor, then, is the only kind that can evoke big laughs. It's the only kind to be found in religious works.
    ellauri030.html on line 920: This has been tested experimentally. Audiences predictably enjoyed witnessing the demise of a disliked character. Testing had to be discontinued when the team ran out of subjects.
    ellauri030.html on line 922: This sounds like Kim´s Convenience.
    ellauri030.html on line 974: Mukana on jotain sitaattia Gigameshista ja muista mesopotamialaisista klassikoista. Vähän teodikean makua tässä on. Elämä on absurdia, mihkään elämässä ei ole oikein kunnon perusteluja. Just tämmösiä vizejä on tehty myöhemminkin, et ensin kexitään joku course of action ja sit ryntätään se perästä.
    ellauri030.html on line 985: Senilia is a genus of edible saltwater clams, marine bivalve mollusks in the family Arcidae, the ark shells. Species. Species within the genus Senilia include: Senilia senilis Linnaeus, 1758; References. External links This Arcidae-related article is a stub. You can help ...
    ellauri031.html on line 32: Hennes bøker for voksne ble derimot ikke tatt godt i mot av datidens anmeldere. Disse var samfunnskritiske og tok blant annet for seg ugifte kvinners kår i samfunnet. Novellesamlingen Som kvinder er (1895) er gjenutgitt flere ganger, og har i ettertid blitt anerkjent som en viktig del av norsk litteraturhistorie.
    ellauri031.html on line 54: För en flickhistoria är den här boken otroligt känslokall. Inger tänker fara igen till Myrdal om sommaren, men bara för att dom hade många körsbärsträd.
    ellauri031.html on line 60: Nästa äventyr handlar om en porslindocka som den lilla pesten gömmer i ett wienerbröd, som prosten (NB en fin person) hittar i brödet och kommer och reklamerar om till bagaren. Den lilla pesten måste medge at det var hon som var bakom saken. Och det var den historien. Hur fängslande.
    ellauri031.html on line 175: - Sukanvarsi Plussan törsäystesti kävi ulkomailla: onko kätevin maxuväline pätäkkä, hillo vai kahiseva?
    ellauri031.html on line 219: Korporatiivisessa valtiossa kaikkia, jotka kuuluvat samaan ammattiin tai luokkaan edustaa ammattikunta, riippumatta siitä ovatko he työnantajia tai työöläisiä ja riippumatta yhteiskunnallisesta asemasta. "Kiellämme että on vain kaksi luokkaa, kiellämme että maailmanhistorian selittää luokkataistelu, sillä ihminen ei ole vain taloudellinen eläin. Väitämme, että luokkataistelu ja luokkien yhteistyö ovat historiallisia vaiheita, väitämme - vastoin sosialismin idyllisiä ennustuxia - että niin kauan kun on ihmisiä maan päälla tulee olemaan taistelua, taistelua yxilöiden, ryhmien, luokkien, kansakuntien ja rotujen välillä - niin on ihmiskunnan kohtalo määrätty. Taistelu ja kamppailu - siinä kohtalo joka on määrätty ihmiskunnalle. Kamppailu koskee koko maailman herruutta ja kaikkien on otettava siihen osaa. On voitettava, mutta voittaaxeen on oltava vakaumus ja uskallettava uhmata kohtaloa. Sankarillisuus on väline ja valta on päämaali." Ymmärtää, ettei fasistinen hallinto ole erityisemmin kiinnostunut Kansainliitosta.
    ellauri031.html on line 294: Eri yhteyxissä on Mussolini selvään antanut ymmärtää ettei fasismi ole mikään vientitavara. Se on liian syvään juurtunut Italian historiaan ja perinteisiin voidaxeen tulla siirretyxi muihin maihin.
    ellauri031.html on line 454: Trollhättan är en tätort i Västergötland och centralort i Trollhättans kommun i Västra Götalands län. En mindre del är belägen i Vänersborgs kommun. Namnet Trollhättan användes ursprungligen endast om Göta älvs fallområde. Trollhättans tätort omfattar idag ett betydligt större område som förr hade andra geografiska namn. Nedan tecknas historiken för det område som idag kallas för Trollhättan.
    ellauri031.html on line 608: Kun vauhtiin pääsin, kopsaan vielä mehukkaimpia kohtia Make Eskelisen Jalli Olosen mestauxesta, joka tulee siantappoaseessa seuraavana. Mä en ole Jallia lukenut kuin vähän sen hiljattaisen toisen tulemisen alkua, eli 1600-luvulle sijoittuvaa Hayleyn apupojan historiikkia. Näyttämönvaihdoxesta huolimatta se kuulosti samantyyppiseltä moraalipuurolta ja angstauxelta kuin nää Maken kuvailemat teoxet: kilttejä setiä, pahoja setiä ja kristillistä moraalia. Ei napannut. Jatko-osassa apupojan seikkailut jatkuu. Jaxan tuskin pysyä hereillä. No nyt lähtee Maken haupizit haukahtelemaan...
    ellauri031.html on line 661: Jutkukouluissa on aapisena raamattu. Niitä ei ollut tarpeexi. Kierot lähetit lahjoittivat ilmaisi piplioita, joissa oli uusi diili mukana. Ortodoxijutkut hurjistuivat, kiellettiin niiden tuonti. Hassuhattu tupsukorva hasidi näki Kaarlon ize teossa ja alkoi rähistä. Onnexi jumalalla on niskaote jahvesta. Kaarlo tuntee nipun puolikuivureita korkeissa paikoissa, mutta sekään ei aina auta mäessää. Kokokuivureita on joukossa noin 15%, mutta niiden valta valitussa kansassa on paljon suurempi.
    ellauri031.html on line 701: Tilanteita syntyy, mut herra karvaa tehokkasti. Isosta kuorma-auto-onnettomuudesta Kaarlo välttyy kuin ihmeen kaupalla (miten niin "kuin"?) ja lähtee ajelemaan mietteliäästi kotiin päin, ei jää ihmettelemään kaatuneita ja haavottuneita. Kyllä herra pitää huolen niistä jotka sen ansaizevat. Iso kivi vierii alas mäkeä, lie ollut jeesuxen haudan peittona, mut Kaarlo saa etiäisen ja ehtii pois tuolista. Tuoli menee tuhannen päreixi. Herra antoi merkin, että saunapuut oli vähissä. Vahva rukousvastaus.
    ellauri031.html on line 736: Äs toi olis ollu komee lopetus, mut täällähän on vielä jotain loppusanoja, lisää siionistista propagandaa ja jumalalla pelottelua. Syväntö siteeraa typerää Kyösti Kalliota, mutta sattuvammin Toynbeetä: historia opettaa, ettei historia opeta mitään. Ei tarvize kuin seurata Palestiinaa vaikkapa sadan vuoden välein 2020ekr-2020jkr niin huomaa sen. Syväntö on ize siitä todiste, vaikkei enää kävelevä, ei päässyt järven yli kuivin jaloin hakemaan karannutta venettä kuin unessa.
    ellauri031.html on line 750: Olavi Syväntöä haastateltiin TV-7:n ohjelmaan Ajankohtaista taivaasta ehkä millenniumin vaihteessa. (Ohjelmatietojen 1970 on takuulla painovirhe, silloinhan Kaarlo oli vielä vauhdissa. Olavi shihishee tässä ohjelmassa jo aika vanhushmaiseshti.) Kiinnostaa, sillä täähän Olavi on aika lailla samanlainen surullinen hahmo kuin Wilho Olavi, karismaattisemman Wilhon seuraaja, samanlainen vähäisempi toimittaja, pikkuprofeetta.
    ellauri032.html on line 200: Pascalin vaaka on yleensä esitetty argumenttina kristinuskon puolesta, mutta koska historia tuntee lukemattomia eri uskontoja ja jumalia laskee todennäköisyys uskoa oikeaan jumalaan. Esimerkiksi imaami voisi käyttää Pascalin vaakaa argumenttina islaminuskon puolesta. Mitä jos jumala onkin iso kana? Lea Lehtisalo perusteli osallistumista Agricolan seurakunnan vanhustilaisuuxiin Pascalin vaa´alla. Tästä voi olla jotakin hyötyä.
    ellauri032.html on line 220: Thomas Stearns Eliot OM (26 September 1888 - 4 January 1965) was a poet, essayist, publisher, playwright, and literary and social critic. Born in St. Louis, Missouri, to a prominent Boston Brahmin family, he moved to England in 1914 at the age of 25 and went on to settle, work and marry there. He became a British subject in 1927 at the age of 39, subsequently renouncing his American citizenship.
    ellauri032.html on line 230: Oh – Vivienne! Was there ever such a torture since life began! – to bear her on one´s shoulders, biting, wriggling, raving, scratching, unwholesome, powdered, insane, yet sane to the point of insanity, reading his letters, thrusting herself on us, coming in wavering trembling ... This bag of ferrets is what Tom wears round his neck.
    ellauri032.html on line 232: Aika kylmiö oli Virginia, niinkuin Tomppakin. Ärsyttävä vulgääri Eine tunkee Bloomsburyn sisärenkaaseen. Kaiken muun keljuuden lisäxi Tomppa oli misogyyni. Viviennen vika oli että sillä oli originaali mieli, ei siis yhtään feminiininen. Tomppa suhtautui naisiin niinkuin juutalaisiin, ne on irrationaalisia. Se ei oikeestaan tykännytkään naisista, vaan pikemminkin miehistä. Naiset oli siitä hiukka pelottavia.
    ellauri032.html on line 238: Was T.S. Eliot gay? Questions about Eliot´s sexuality have simmered in Eliot studies for decades, coming to a full boil with the recent publication of Carole Seymour-Jones's biography of Eliot's first wife, Vivienne, which claims that the poet was a closet homosexual. Distinguished critics such as Helen Vendler and Louis Menand have rushed to Eliot´s defense, insisting either that he wasn't gay or that we shouldn't even be discussing his sexuality.
    ellauri032.html on line 244: To understand the method which Pascal employs, the reader must be prepared to follow the process of the mind of the intelligent believer. The Christian thinker – and I mean the man who is trying consciously and conscientiously to explain to himself the sequence which culminates in faith, rather than the public apologist – proceeds by rejection and elimination. … To the unbeliever, this method seems disingenuous and perverse: for the unbeliever is, as a rule, not so greatly troubled to explain the world to himself, nor so greatly distressed by its disorder; nor is he generally concerned (in modern terms) to ‘preserve values’. He does not consider that if certain emotional states, certain developments of character, and what in the highest sense can be called ‘saintliness’ are inherently and by inspection known to be good, then the satisfactory explanation of the world must be an explanation which will admit the ‘reality’ of these values. Nor does he consider such reasoning admissible; he would, so to speak, trim his values according to his cloth, because to him such values are of no great value. The unbeliever starts from the other end, and as likely as not with the question: Is a case of human parthenogenesis credible? and this he would call going straight to the heart of the matter.
    ellauri032.html on line 247: Eliotin mielestä on epähienoa uskoa jeesuxen sanaan ihmeiden voimalla, pikemminkin päinvastoin, pitäis uskoa ihmeisiin koska jeesus sanoo niin. No ei se kyllä niinpäin mennyt jeesuxen aikana, tää on myöhempien aikojen pyhistelijöiden sievistelyä. Et jeesus ois sanonu: Kato mä kävelen järvellä! ja kazomo ois vaan nyökkinyt, jes, jes, indeed sir, if you say so. Valitettava tosiseikka on, ettei Eliotin kaltaiset tolkun ihmiset usko ihmeisiin, ne on lastensatua. Ne poimii uskonnoistakin vaan helpoiten sulavia haarukkapaloja. Rusinat niinku pullasta.
    ellauri032.html on line 251: Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point, how often one has heard that quoted, and quoted often to the wrong purpose! For this is by no means an exaltation of the ‘heart’ over the ‘head’, a defence of unreason. The heart, in Pascal’s terminology, is itself truly rational if it is truly the heart. For him, in theological matters which seemed to him much larger, more difficult, and more important than scientific matters, the whole personality is involved.
    ellauri032.html on line 255: This is the way the world ends
    ellauri032.html on line 271: Thomas Hobbes (5. huhtikuuta 1588 Westport, Wiltshire – 4. joulukuuta 1679 Hardwick Hall, Derbyshire) oli englantilainen filosofi. Hänet tunnetaan ennen kaikkea poliittisesta filosofiastaan, mutta hän kirjoitti myös historiasta, geometriasta, etiikasta ja yleisestä filosofiasta. Enimmäxeen paaaaaaskaa.
    ellauri032.html on line 293: Piispa John Bramhall, vannoutunut arminianismin kannattaja (ks yllä), julkaisi pienen tutkielman Of Liberty and Necessity joka oli osoitettu Hobbesille. Bramhall oli tavannut Hobbesin aiemmin ja väitellyt tämän kanssa, ja kirjoitti jälkeenpäin näkemyksensä Hobbesin vastattavaksi. Hobbes vastasi, mutta ei julkaistavaksi. Eräs ranskalainen tuttava kuitenkin julkaisi vastauksen. Bramhall julkaisi vuonna 1655 vastaiskuna kaiken kirjeenvaihdon heidän välillään nimellä A Defence of the True Liberty of Human Actions from Antecedent or Extrinsic Necessity. Vuonna 1656 Hobbesilla oli puolestaan valmiina teos Questions concerning Liberty, Necessity and Chance, jolla hän vastasi piispalle voimallisesti. Hobbesin vastaukset olivat merkittäviä vapaan tahdon ongelman historiassa mahdollisesti ensimmäisinä selkeän psykologisen determinismin esityksinä. Piispa vastasi syytöksiin vuonna 1658 teoksella Castigations of Mr Hobbes´s Animadversions, johon oli liitetty laaja liite nimellä The Catching of Leviathan the Great Whale. Hobbes ei koskaan vastannut tähän teokseen.
    ellauri032.html on line 299: Hobbes kauhistui harhaoppisen leimasta ja koitti pyristellä syytteistä. Määräys kielsi Hobbesta enää koskaan julkaisemasta teoksia jotka käsittelisivät inhimillistä eli huonoa käytöstä. Vuoden 1668 painos hänen teoksestaan painettiin Amsterdamissa, koska hän ei saanut sensoreilta lupaa sen julkaisemiseen Englannissa. Muut teokset julkaistiin vasta hänen kuolemansa jälkeen.
    ellauri032.html on line 384: Pascalin kartioleikkauxia on taivaankappaleiden radat. Komeetta joka ei palaa piirtää hyperbelin. Semmosen kuin Aniara. Se oli aika ahistava runokirja nuorena. Mainizinkin sen yo-aineessa, jonka ozikkona oli Todennäköisyyxien maailma. Mainizin myös Monodin. Hyvä veto, vaikkei Pascalin. Täydestä meni, uppos lautakunnan lautapäihin kuin veizi voihin. Kirjoitin sen vesirokossa vanhempien sängyssä. Sanoin izeäni agnostikoxi nuorena. Mitähän mäkin olin tietävinäni todennäköisyyxistä lyhyeltä matikkapohjalta. Ei niitä edes opetettu. Ateisti-Airaxisen miälestä agnostikot on pelkureita. Niin ne onkin. Odottelee kentän reunalla kumpi puoli voittaa, ja säntää sitten juhlimaan voittajien kaa. Lea Lehtisalo oli. Ongelma on että pelimiehet ei pidä niistä. Joka eio meidän puolella on meitä vastaan, tää on nollasummapeliä. Ei oo mitään win-winiä, on enintään lose-lose.
    ellauri032.html on line 620: maailmassa pyyhiskellä pyllyä

    ellauri032.html on line 651: Tästä hemmosta oli puhe kirkkohissassa, ja herranhuutilaisuudesta kanssa. Mä en kyllä oppinut erottamaan sitä edes 1400-luvun huussilaisuudesta, puhumattakaan Franz Pieperistä, tiukkaluterilaisesta, joka sattui samaan googlehakuun Husin kaa. Mitenhän se Google oikeen näkee suoraan pieneen sydämmeen? No Zinzendorf ansaizee tässä sijansa sillä, että Goethen äiskä, Frau Rat, oli tähän kreiviin päin kallellaan, plus sen naisystävä, joka hellästi paranteli Häschel-Hansia tubikohtauxesta.
    ellauri033.html on line 41: Nää(kin) on bourgeois poikia jotka hännystelee homona aatelia. Katolisia poliittisia konservatiiveja. 1870 sotahäpeän todistajia revanchisteja. Pirun oppipoikia kadonnutta aikaa ezimässä. Hienohattusia wiixekkäitä fin de siècle snoppeja. Antediluviaalisia amfibisia sammakkomiehiä.
    ellauri033.html on line 51: Sillä oli aatelisia leikkikavereina kuin M. Maigretilla ja Monika Fagerholmilla. Hugon, Byronin ja Ball-sackin fani nuorena, tollasta romanttista realismia ja taantumusta. Osallistu tuhmien snobbailijapoikien kemuihin mutta kauhisteli Rimbaudia.
    ellauri033.html on line 79: Georges Pellissier, né le 7 février 1852 à Monflanquin (Lot-et-Garonne) et mort en 1918 à Montauban, est un écrivain français, spécialiste de littérature française. Il fut docteur ès lettres et professeur de rhétorique au lycée Janson-de-Sailly1. Il a notamment écrit un traité historique de versification française.
    ellauri033.html on line 192: Si les Goncourt se donnent pour des historiographes de la société
    ellauri033.html on line 194: cune différence entre l´histoire et le reportage., Edmond se vante
    ellauri033.html on line 344: In 1891 publiceerde hij de satanische roman Là-bas (Uit de diepte), rond het historische personage Gilles de Rais. Een hoofdpersonage uit deze roman weerspiegelt eveneens Huysmans´ persoonlijke evolutie; een satanische wording, waar occultisme en sensualiteit voorafgaan aan zijn bekering tot het christelijke geloof (La Cathédrale (1898) en L´Oblat, (1903)) waartoe esthetische overdenkingen hem brengen. Vanaf dan zouden alleen nog maar rooms-katholiek geïnspireerde werken verschijnen.
    ellauri033.html on line 460: Hippolyte Taine mainitaan pahisten joukossa. Taine oli ranskalainen kirjallisuuden ja muunkin vehkeilyn historioizija, taantumuxellinen kyllä mutta maallinen, jota piispa Dupanloup vainosi kuin susi. Zola ei tykännyt kun Taine johtii kirjallisuuden liian suoraan kirjailijan taustasta. Kyllä taiteilijankin pitää jotain saada vaivan palkaxi. Tätähän mä oon tässä koittanut korjata, kun käytän tätä henkilö ja elämä metodia. Taine tais olla äidin poika, ainakin sen isä kuoli sen pienenä ollessa. Jeesuxen elämänkerturi Renan on jo tuttu sapajou-apinoista. Tainea haukuskelee kaikki, kun se ei osannut olla selkeästi sitä eikä tätä. Sellanen kentiesmies. Hippolyte Taine. Tintissä oli professori Hippolyte Bergamotte. Mutta Taine on enemmän luihun Aristide Filosellen näköinen. Ihan on samixet.
    ellauri033.html on line 468: Hippolyte Adolphe Taine (21. huhtikuuta 1828 Vouziers – 5. maaliskuuta 1893 Pariisi) oli ranskalainen kriitikko ja historioitsija. Hän oli vankka positivismin kannattaja ja yksi ensimmäisistä kriittisen historiantutkimuksen tekijöistä. Taine tunnetaan kolmitahoisesta lähestymistavastaan, joita hän kutsui nimellä rotu, miljöö ja hetki taiteen kontekstuaaliseen tutkimukseen.
    ellauri033.html on line 496: Ensimmäisen konsulikautensa aikana 222 eaa. Marcellus taisteli Insubriassa ja saavutti spolia opiman kolmatta ja viimeistä kertaa Rooman historiassa. (The spolia opima ("rich spoils") were the armour, arms, and other effects that an ancient Roman general stripped from the body of an opposing commander slain in single combat. The spolia opima were regarded as the most honourable of the several kinds of war trophies a commander could obtain, including enemy military standards and the peaks of warships.) Hän vapautti roomalaisen varuskunnan Clasditiumissa ja valtasi Mediolanumin. Vuonna 216 eaa. Rooman hävittyä Cannaessa hän komensi armeijan jäännöksiä Canusiumissa ja pelasti Nolan ja eteläisen Campanian Hannibalilta. Vuosina 214–211 eaa. hän oli konsulina kolmatta kertaa palvellen Sisiliassa. Hän hyökkäsi Leontinoihin ja valtasi Syrakusan kahden vuoden piirityksen jälkeen. Hänen joukkonsa surmasivat tiedemies Arkhimedeen kaupungin valtauksen yhteydessä. (Noli turbare circulos meos.) Marcellius ryösti kaupungin ja toi sen aarteet Roomaan. Hän oli konsulina jälleen 210 eaa. vallaten Salapian Apuliassa, joka oli kapinoinut liittyen Hannibaliin. Vuonna 209 eaa. hän taisteli ratkaisemattomaan päättyneen taistelun Hannibalia vastaan Venusiassa. Hän sai surmansa väijytyksessä viidennellä konsulikaudellaan 208 eaa. ollessaan tiedustelemassa vihollisen asemia.
    ellauri033.html on line 498: Hirvee mulkero. Esipuheessa vähäpätöisempi mulkero Bourget jo paljastaa karvansa, se setäilee nuorelle (mies)lukijalle ihan vimmatusti, tärkeilee ja puhuu pyhistä pataljoonista, vaikkei se ei ize 19-vuotiaana heilauttanut evääkään kun Ranska kärsi rökäletappion Saxalle 1871. Täähän oli entiselle suurvallalle tosi nolo sauma kun surkea Saxa pisti niin pahasti turpaan aurinkokunkun ja Napsun perikunnalle. Tämmösiä nolostuneita herrakansoja on läjäpäin, eikä niissä ole kovin kiva tunnelma. Parempi ois kun eivät eläis niin tiimihengessä. Futismazienkin häviäjät menee särkemään nakkikojuja ja autoja. Huligaanit ja graffitien piirtelijät kuseskelevat in effigie voittajien reviirille huonoina häviäjinä.
    ellauri033.html on line 520: Greslou on se clasu Chambige josta kirjotettiin lehissä. Sixte ei lue lehtiä. Se halvexuu koulufilosofiaa, se on soveltava filosofi. Harrastaa systeemifilosofiaa ja sielutiedettä. Työpsykologiaa. Tilanne on syvästi koominen, muistuttaa Polle. Tuomari on uuden koulun miehiä ja sen kaveri vielä pahempi, vivööri sormi ajan pulssilla, "mukana junassa", kuten trendasi sanoa 1887. Maistraatti ja bulevardööri ihmelettävät, kuin pikanttejakin detaljeja naisista kirjoittanut misantrooppi onkin kiltin ja ujon näköinen. Tuomari ei voi uskoa ettei se lue lehtiä.
    ellauri033.html on line 530: Sijoittaen tän ajatuxen sit tohon deterministiseen zygologiaan, voi ennustaa et 1) iso data tulee toteuttamaan monia Sixten haaveita historian ennakoimisesta lyhyellä tähtäimellä, 2) lopputulos siitä manipuloinnista tulee olemaan entistä lyhkäsempi ja ikävämpi tulevaisuus kaikille ja 3) jos se on mahollista tehdä niin se tapahtuu, sitä ei mikään estä. Apinalauma valuu kuin vesi syvimpään lätäkköön, sinne missä rahantulo on helpointa.
    ellauri033.html on line 564: Toi Musset taitaa olla aika tärkee Bourgetille, se oli dändi ennen dändiä. Täytyy tehdä siitä ihan oma paasaus. Jos usko on lastenkaltaisexi palanneiden ukkeleiden ja mummeleiden heiniä, niin romantiikka on kuin tehty nuorisoa varten. Kun mahla nousee ja panohaaveet on vilkkaimmillaan, tekee mieli lukea tollasta romanttista höttöä. Niinku tää: "Jumalattomuus on tää kaunis nuori mies joka viimeisen yönsä aamusella kazoo verenkarvaista sarastusta ja salamana näkee koko historian ja legendojen taivaanrannan, palataxeen sitten painamaan pääkyn kauniin tytön tisseille, kauneimman unelmansa, jota se rakastaa liian myöhään nyt." Justiinsa niin, liian myöhään joo, todennäköisemmin se tuli ihan liian aikaisin.
    ellauri033.html on line 574: Setämieskirjailijat, kuis ollakaan, kirjottaa nenäkkäistä nuorista miehistä jotka ezii izeään omasta ja naisystävien pyllyvälistä. Näitä piisaa. Pieru exyxissä itkevät ja nussivat nuoria huoria ja/tai ahnaita puumia. Nuorten miesten esikoisromaanint ja leffat tuppaa olemaan sellaisia vielä tänäkin päivänä, ja varmaan tulee olemaan maailman tappiin asti. Pyllyvälistä se minuus on löytyvä. No se tappikin voi siinä olla jo arvaamattoman lähellä. Hukkapätkän mainizemia ja muita seuraavassa taulukossa:
    ellauri033.html on line 617: Passow studerade i Leipzig under Gottfried Hermann, kallades 1807 av Goethe till Weimars gymnasium som överlärare i grekiska, åtog sig 1810 uppdraget att leda samt omorganisera läroverket Conradinum nära Danzig och blev 1815 professor i klassisk fornkunskap vid universitetet i Breslau. Passow vann mycket anseende både genom sin lärarverksamhet och sina skrifter. Han är mest känd genom Handwörterbuch der griechischen Sprache (1819-24, 5:e upplagan 1841-1857, utgiven av Valentin Rost och Johann Friedrich Palm; "Grekiskt och svenskt lexikon", 2 band, 1841, översättning av Wilhelm Gumælius).
    ellauri033.html on line 705: Lapset istuttavat kevätkukkia ajankuluxi, Seijan mielikukkia, narsisteja. Ne on ihanan keväisiä, nahisevia.
    ellauri033.html on line 782: Kun hän jatkoi, hänen äänensä oli tukahtunut, syyttävä: Niin, tilinteon hetki on tullut. Olette luulleet, että kun käytte herran huoneessa sunnuntaina, saatte huolettomina elää arkipäivänne. Olette kuvitelleet,että rikollisen ajattelemattomuutenne hyvityxexi riittää jumalalle pelkkä polvennotkistus. Mutta jumala ei ota vastaan mitä tahansa. Tuollaiset määräaikaiset suhteet eivät hänen ankaralle rakkaudelleen riitä. Hän on tahtonut teidän viipyvän hänen silmiensä edessä kauemmin. Sellainen on hänen rakastamisen tapansa ja loppujen lopuxi sellainen on myös ainoa rakastamistapa. Juuri sixi, väsyneenä odottamaan teitä, hän on antanut maanvaivan tulla luoxenne niinkuin se on käynyt jokaisessa synnin saastuttamassa kaupungissa ihmiskunnan historian alusta asti.
    ellauri033.html on line 1071: Cynthia oli Sextus Propertiuxen hoito. Sextus Propertius was a Latin elegiac poet of the Augustan age. He was born around 50–45 BC in Assisium and died shortly after 15 BC. Propertius´ surviving work comprises four books of Elegies (Elegiae). He was a friend of the poets Gallus and Virgil and, with them, had as his patron Maecenas and, through Maecenas, the emperor Augustus. Although Propertius was minor in his own time compared to other Latin elegists, today he´s regarded by scholars as a major poet.
    ellauri033.html on line 1073: Emile Laure oli II maailmansodan armeijankenraali Vauclusesta, Vichy-luopio, mitäs se puuhaa Lamartinen runossa? Sori my bad, puhe on jostain toisesta Lauresta. No Vauclusessa on myös ravintola Petrarque et Laure, josta jenkkivieraat sanovat: Good food but lousy service. Koska Vauclusessa on Mont Ventoux, jolle Petrarca kipusi jollain wanderungilla: For pleasure alone he climbed Mont Ventoux, which rises to more than six thousand feet, beyond Vaucluse. It was no great feat, of course; but he was the first recorded Alpinist of modern times, the first to climb a mountain merely for the delight of looking from its top. (Or almost the first; for in a high pasture he met an old shepherd, who said that fifty years before he had attained the summit, and had got nothing from it save toil and repentance and torn clothing.) Petrarch was dazed and stirred by the view of the Alps, the mountains around Lyons, the Rhone, the Bay of Marseilles. He took Augustine´s Confessions from his pocket and reflected that his climb was merely an allegory of aspiration toward a better life. Vanha paimen oli tyytyväinen kun joku oli vielä tyhmempi kuin se, niinkuin Roope ezimässä nelikulmaisia munia.
    ellauri033.html on line 1075: Eleonora d´Este is best known as the beloved of Italian poet Torquato Tasso (1544-1595). In 1565, Tasso was 21 when he first met the beautiful 28-year-old Eleonora at the court of Alfonso, and he was quickly infatuated. An indiscreet remark made by one of the courtiers regarding the poet´s veneration of the princess caused Tasso to challenge the offender. The courtier, along with his three brothers, attacked Tasso, but others put an end to the duel. Alphonso, incensed by this outburst, sent Tasso away from the court, where he remained subject to the duke´s call.
    ellauri033.html on line 1076: According to legend, Tasso wrote verses to his beloved Eleonora that touched her heart. A few years later, at the wedding of one of the Gonzaga family, celebrated at the court of Este, Tasso kissed the princess Eleonora on the cheek. Furious, Alphonso turned coolly to his courtiers and remarked, "What a great pity that the finest genius of the age has become suddenly mad!" The duke had Tasso shut up in the hospital of St. Anna in Ferrara. (In actuality, Tasso had been beset by delusional fears of persecution starting in 1575 and began a series of mad wanderings around 1577.)
    ellauri033.html on line 1093: Considérer sa propre destinée comme un corollaire dans cette géometrie vivante qui est la nature, et par suite comme une conséquence inévitable de cet axiome éternel dont le développement indéfini se prolongue à travers le temps et l´espace, tel est le unique principe de l´affranchissement.
    ellauri033.html on line 1133: Ce n´est pas la philosophie mais la philologie qui finalement éveille le doute chez Renan. Renan apprend l´hebreu et constate à cette époque que la deuxième partie d´Isaïe diffère de la première non seulement quant au style, mais également quant à la date, que la grammaire et l´histoire du Pentateuque sont postérieures à l´époque de Moïse et que le livre de Daniel est manifestement apocryphe.
    ellauri033.html on line 1139: Il trouve des amis protestantiques. Il entre aussi en franc-maçonnerie. Kaikesta tästä debaucheriestä huolimatta se valittiin akateemikoxi ja sai tukuittain muita palkintoja. Bourget puhisi kiukusta ja kadehti.
    ellauri033.html on line 1143: La Vie de Jésus (1863) contient la thèse, alors controversée, selon laquelle la biographie de Jésus doit être comprise comme celle de n´importe quel autre homme, et la Bible comme devant être soumise à un examen critique comme n´importe quel autre document historique. Ceci déclenche des débats passionnés et la colère de l´Église catholique.
    ellauri033.html on line 1146: Mulla on Ernun kontroversielli teos Jeesuksen elämästä ruozixi ikävän JW Snellmanin aikoinaan omistamana kappaleena. Vanhuxena Ernu kirjoitti viisiosaisen Israelin kansan historian sekä useita teoksia itämaisesta filosofiasta ja arkeologiasta.
    ellauri033.html on line 1167: Hän julkaisi vuonna 1884 Mustetahrat -nimistä lehteä, joka esiintyi nazirevanshistipoikien äänitorvena. Hän liikkui muun muassa huijarirunoilija Leconte de Lislen ja symbolistipaskiaisten piireissä. Barrès kohosi nopeasti maineeseen sekä keikarimaisilla elämäntavoillaan että varhaisilla teoksillaan, joista useimmat olivat avainromaaneja. Vuosina 1888–1891 ilmestyneessä ensimmäisessä romaanitrilogiassaan Le Culte du moi (”Minän kultti”) Barrès uppoutuu tiiviisti itsetutkiskeluun, ylistää individualismia, ivaa vallitsevia arvoja ja hierarkioita sekä tuo esiin kiinnostuksensa kuoleman ja dekadenssin teemoihin. Mikä perse! Hän sai lempinimen prince de la jeunesse (”nuorison ruhtinas”). Vittu pahan ruhtinas, suoraan Mordorista. Nationalismi korvaa culte du moin culte du moi et mes copainsilla. Yhtä syvältä on molemmat.
    ellauri034.html on line 54: Niinpä niin. Tiimikuuluvuus on tärkeintä, luotonanto meidän meemeille. Sitähän ne nazitkin yritti tolkuttaa, tyhmät Quangelit vaan eivät uskoneet. Ei auttanut kuin irrottaa rumihista tyhmä pää.
    ellauri034.html on line 88: Persicket asuu 1. kerroxessa, Quangelit 2.ssa, ja joku jutkuämmä 5. (saxalaisittain 4.) kerroxessa, hissittömässä talossa (sanotaan 1949, ei 2015). Eva Kluge jakaa postia alhaalta ylöspäin (mix kantaa kaikki turhaan yläkertaan ensin), joten sen on jatkettava Quangeleilta ylöspäin. Tää on oikein sanottu 1949, mutta 2015 Eva muka lähtee alaspäin. Voi hemmetti. Voiko mihinkään enää luottaa.
    ellauri034.html on line 235: Luonnonhistorian loppu, sen vihoviimeinen kexintö

    ellauri034.html on line 283: Sukupuolten työnjako lissääntymisessä vois luonnostaan tehdä koiraasta valtaa kahmivan ja reviiriä laajentavan meemipellen, eihän se tiedä loppupeleissä kuka on se poikanen, joten sen kanzii keskittyä panotilaisuuxien maximointiin max isolla reviirillä. Naaraalle ei jää äitiydestä mitään epäselvyyttä. Sen kanzii pitää superhyvää huolta omista varmoista jälkeläisistä, se ei voita mitään vitun saarnoista ja löytöretkistä. Six on isänmaa ja äidinkieli, lapsi oppii kielen lähikosketuxessa äidiltä ja idioottimeemit 7v täytettyään isältä siinä onnellisessa tapauxessa et se on pikkuveitikka. Sixiköhän nimenomaan miesrunoilijoita, pappeja, poliitikkoja, ja filosoofeja kuhisee kuin kirppuja dromedaarin kyttyrässä? Kilpaa huutavia mölyapinoita, peipposia koivun latvassa. Apus mun! Mä näin sen ensin! Jotain rajaa!
    ellauri034.html on line 294: August von Kotzebue tapettiin keppijumppanujakassa 1819. Alaskassa on Kotzebuen salmi ja kaupunki, Otto von Kotzebuen mukaan nimetty. Räävelissä 1787 syntynyt Otto, Akun poika, kartoitti Alaskaa ryssille. Ryssä möi sen sitten jenkeille 1867. 100v myöhemmin meidän perhe kazoi Suomi 50 ilotulitusta tähtitorninmäeltä. Sitä 50v uudempi on kuva missä Saarinen ja kuningatar hymyilevät linnan juhlissa Suomi 100-kyltin kyljessä.. Alexander Kotzebue maalasi hulluna vuotena 1948 taulun 7-vuotisen sodan Kunersdorfin taistelusta kaxi vuosisataa ennen kuin mä aloitin Tehtaankadun kansakoulun 1959. Oli varmaan samaa huonetta ja sukua. Kunersdorfissa ryssä ja itävalta löivät Friedrich der Grossen armeijan, suuret preussilaiset pienixi muruixi. Saxan suurvaltatoiveet tyssäsivät taas. Verdammt! Retu jäi kotiin hoitamaan kihtiä kaalinlehtikääryleillä Emanuel Bachin säestäessä cembalolla. Kuten kertoilee mamuprofessori Crister Pursiainen populäärishistoriallisessa pläjäyxessä hovitsempalisti ja hänen kuninkaansa 2017, kirjan lainasi Riku Seijalle joka ei myöskään jaxa sitä lukea. Rikuilla oli Somervillessä pörhöhäntäinen kissanpoika nimeltä Klobürste. Se oxenteli karvapalloja. Zum kotzen.
    ellauri034.html on line 419: Vanhemmat oli molemmat Galician eli Puolan ja Ukrainan rajaseudun juutalaisia. Siellä niitä sikisi kuin kärpäsiä, kunnes ryssät alko ajaa niitä pois, kts. Viulunsoittaja katolla. Get off my property! (Tosi amerikkalaisesti sanottu galitsian jutkulta ryssän upseerille muuten, tais olla vaihtoehtoista historiaa.)
    ellauri034.html on line 431: Aika pahoja miehiä on joukossa, idoja julkkixia ja tavixempia. Ei yhtään naista. Freud vaihto jurasta medisiinaan, vaan rikastuipa sittenkin, kuten Pauli Pylkkänen joka vaihtoi historian kirurgiaan.
    ellauri034.html on line 545: Achebe´s critics argue that he fails to distinguish Marlow's view from Conrad's, which results in very clumsy interpretations of the novella. Jeffrey Meyers notes that Conrad, like his back door acquaintance Roger Casement, "was one of the first men to question the Western notion of progress, a dominant idea in Europe from the Renaissance to the Great War, to attack the hypocritical justification of colonialism and to reveal... the savage degradation of the white man in Africa."
    ellauri034.html on line 547: Chinua Achebe was a Nigerian novelist, poet, and critic who is regarded as the dominant figure of modern African literature. His first novel and magnum opus, Things Fall Apart, occupies a pivotal place in African literature and remains the most widely studied, translated and read African novel. If Conrad or his novel is racist, it is only in a weak sense, since Heart of Darkness acknowledges racial distinctions "but does not suggest an essential superiority" of any group.
    ellauri035.html on line 62: ei ahista verstas eikä opiskelijat.
    ellauri035.html on line 105: My thought is all of this gold-tinted king's daughter
    ellauri035.html on line 154: I see the heavy startled hair of this reed-flute player
    ellauri035.html on line 185: With his dark stumbling-block to hide her rays.
    ellauri035.html on line 193: Tenderly tired hair of this king's daughter.
    ellauri035.html on line 275: Leading to his grim bed. Little lonely one,
    ellauri035.html on line 282: And that is all. This night she rests not well;
    ellauri035.html on line 288: Her little breasts the life beyond this life.
    ellauri035.html on line 298: Found not the salt of the whispers of my girl,
    ellauri035.html on line 313: With on his axe the moon and in his dripping net
    ellauri035.html on line 317: To lie under the clematis with his girl.
    ellauri035.html on line 347: Love is a god and Rati the dark his bride;
    ellauri035.html on line 361: Bearding her black-beard father in his wrath,
    ellauri035.html on line 386: With a clear purpose in his flower-flecked length
    ellauri035.html on line 420: In his high secret purposes
    ellauri035.html on line 463: That day, and the days, and this the latest day.
    ellauri035.html on line 468: Waters of languor, this dear bright-coloured bird,
    ellauri035.html on line 485: This last poor time. I stand beside our bed;
    ellauri035.html on line 510: Nay, were I free as the condor with his wings
    ellauri035.html on line 1043: Rabinow on vähän kuin Samu Butlerin Erewhonin maahanmuuttaja. He is a real erewhon man / sitting in his erewhon land / making all his erewhon plans for nobody. Utopistista paskanjauhantaa Thomas Moren malliin. Sitäkään mä en ole vielä jauhanut. Näitä permutaatioita hyppypapujen asennoista apinoiden päässä piisaa. Oxymoroneita, the more the merrier.
    ellauri035.html on line 1061: Helppoa kuin heinänteko. Ruåzalaisten ekoista rumihista 2/3 oli somaleja, loput vanhuxia. Du gamla du svarta, det är tid å gå. Teette ekotekoja.
    ellauri035.html on line 1107: P. Balthazar eli Balthasar eli Balthassar, eli Bithisarea oli perinteinen kolmas tietäjä, eli maagi Raamatussa Kasperin ja Melkiorin lisäxi, jotka toi Jeesuxelle syntymäpäivälahjoja. Aika tylsiä paketteja vaikka kovia, nimittäin kultaa mirhamia ja pyhää savua (no ei se savu ollut kovaa, mutta suizukkeet oli jotain paloja tai tikkuja). Balthazar oli arabisheikki joka toi mirhamia, eli pyllyvoidetta. Äiti oli lahjaan enemmän kuin tyytyväinen, vaipat oli siihen aikaan tosi huonoja. Niin aina. No Jeesus oli niin pikkuinen ettei sillä varmaan ollut vielä mielipidettä, vaikka myöhemmin sillä niitä oli vaikka muille jakaa. Ja jakoikin, lyhemmittä puheitta.
    ellauri035.html on line 1113: Balzun veljet oli Pedro, Felipe, Raimundo y Magdalena (sekin oli veli vaikka huzun niminen. Spanjuureilla on ihmisille outoja nimiä joita muut ei antaisi kuin lemmikeille.). Kuudes veljes Lorenzo oli Balzu ize salanimellä. Antonio-setä oli ikävä. Toledossa oli kivaa. Sen rehtori Zaragozassa oli Villanueva, el Zorron kylä. Se just sano 1625 Baldee sapekkaax. Koleerisex ja sangviinisex samalla aikaa. Koleerinen koska se aina rähisi, mut sangviininen koska se oli epäpelottava ruipelo.
    ellauri035.html on line 1185: Ekassa osassa En la primavera de la niñez (lapsuuden keväässä) ne on kuninkaan hovissa, missä ne kärsii kaikenlaisia pettymyxiä. Toisessa osassa En el otoño de la varonil edad (miehuusiän syksyssä), ne menee Aragonin läpi ja käy Salastanon talossa (Graciánin kaverin Lastanosan), ja sieltä Ranskaan, jota jesuitta sanoo Hypocrindan erämaaxi, missä on vaan tekopyhiä ja hölmöjä, ja päätyvät lopulta hullujenhuoneeseen. Kolmannessa osassa En el invierno de la vejez (vanhuuden talvessa) ne tulee Roomaan, käy akatemiassa missä ne tapaa miehistä kexeliäimmät, ja lopulta pääsee kuolematonten saarelle.
    ellauri035.html on line 1252: On his side, on his back, he turned, and back again.
    ellauri035.html on line 1276: Pitkään ajatteli, ah- pitkään ahisteli,
    ellauri036.html on line 26: Mussetin lähihistorian resumé on ihan parasta mitä olen historian alalta lukenut. Parempaa ainakin kuin Thukydides (se oli ikävystyttävä).
    ellauri036.html on line 258: Le temps où se faisait tout ce qu'a dit l'histoire;
    ellauri036.html on line 576: Réfléchissant les fleurs et l'étoile qui passe,
    ellauri036.html on line 1048: Kaipaatteko aikaa jolloin tapahtui kaikki nk. historia,
    ellauri036.html on line 1056: Minä jään seisaalleni pyhissä porttikonkeissa,
    ellauri036.html on line 1253: joka kazoo kelloa ja paimen joka rämisee ja sähisee,
    ellauri036.html on line 1402: Te jotka elätte iloisesti syvästi kauhistuen
    ellauri036.html on line 1562: Mutta taivaan linnut on niitä kauhistuneet.
    ellauri036.html on line 1702: Oj! Te mutisette sen pyhissä kehissänne,
    ellauri036.html on line 1904: Loppu onkin jo historiaa. Hyvää pääsiäistä kaikille!
    ellauri036.html on line 1952: YouTube co-founder Jawed Karim credits the incident with leading to the creation of the video sharing website. The incident also made "Janet Jackson" the most searched person and term of 2004 and 2005. The incident broke the record for "most searched event over one day". The incident became the most watched, recorded and replayed television moment in TiVo history and "enticed an estimated 35,000 new [TiVo] subscribers to sign up". The term "wardrobe malfunction" was coined as a result of the incident, and was eventually added to the Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.
    ellauri036.html on line 1976: Mut ei kaikki tunteet ole hyviä eikä tarpeellisia. On tehtävä vähän apuharvennusta, ettei sentimentalisoida liiaxi. Ei kai, arvaa ketä Martta tässä kohtaa raahaa sisään ovesta - ketäs muuta kuin Heräteostosta! Ei vittu, Martta leikkaa tässä hautanurmen reunaa kyllä vähän liian hienoisella kynsileikkurilla: on erotettava hyviä huonoja fiiwixiä, ja huonoja hyviä fiiwixiä myös. Voi olla ihan jees näyttää fäkkiä ruumiskasalle, jos kysessä on HYWÄ huono fiiwis, eikä HUONO hywä fiiwis. Helvatti, Marthan laista tuubaa voi suoltaa ainoastaan amerikkalaisen kasvatuxen saanut puoliveteinen hihhuli, jolle naku lapsi on jo kauhistus.
    ellauri036.html on line 2085: Nyt ei ole juhla. Juuri tänään koko maailmalla on hätä. Vessapaperikin alkaa olla vähissä. Vaik hetkinen, kristikunta, eikös paras pitänyt olla vielä edessä? Eikös se ole tässä juuri luvassa? Paapa tulee, oletko valmis? Mä oon vaaalmiis! Tuu pyyhkimään!
    ellauri037.html on line 268: Scanning in his mind so many times and places,
    ellauri037.html on line 351: And who's this little fellow in his itty-bitty robe?
    ellauri037.html on line 355: Whose teensy hand is this, whose little ear and eye and nose?
    ellauri037.html on line 368: then just before the labor his mother's fateful dream:
    ellauri037.html on line 375: looks just like his folks, like a kitten in a basket,
    ellauri037.html on line 385: A history teacher loosens his collar
    ellauri037.html on line 464: Tentti koskee ihmiskunnan historiaa.
    ellauri037.html on line 528: Meidän monogaamisessa maanosassa avioliitto meinaa oikeuxien puolitusta ja velvollisuuxien kaxinkertaistusta. Muualla sentään käy toisinpäin, oikeudet 2-kertaistuu ja velvollisuudet puolittuu. Voi vittu sentään että piti käydä heikosti. Vaan kun lait salli naisille samat oikeudet kuin miehille, ois niiden pitänyt tehdä niistä yhtä tyhmiä kuin miehistä, nyt ne on aivan ylivoimaisia. Voi vittu sentään että piti käydä heikosti. Mitä enemmän oikeudet ja kunnioitus minkä laki suo naikkosille ylittää niiden luonnollisen aseman, sitä enemmän ne vähentää niiden naisten lukua, jotka oikeasti pääsee osille näistä eduista, ja vievät yhtä paljon etuuxia lopuilta.
    ellauri037.html on line 579: Tässä vaiheessa Sope tutustui myös Herderin oppilaaseen Majeriin, joka opetti sille Upanishadia. Sopen mielestä Buddha oli lähes yhtä kova jäbä kuin Plato ja Kant. Se luki vielä Bhagavad Gitan ja jotain värikuvapainoxia hinduismista, plus takusti Kama Sutran, vaikkei sitä mainita. Semmielestä buddhismi oli ihan ykkösuskonto, koska se selittää myös peräkkäisten mutta silti niin samanlaisten villakoirien ytimen, se on sielunvaellus. Myöhemmin Sope väitti et se oli kexinyt intialaisen filosofian ize, yhdennäköisyys vedoihin on pelkkää sattumaa.
    ellauri037.html on line 594: Välillä se haaveili naimisiinmenosta. 39-vuotiaana kosiskeili jotain 17-vuotiasta neizykäistä, joka varmaan laatttas hihaansa. Sitä vitutti jo silloin monogamia, ehdotteli jotain ristiinsuihkintaa, pani on and off jotain 6 vuotta vanhempaa tanssijatarhaahkaa (varmaan sovitusta hinnasta), jonka se oli tavannut jo koulupoikana, jolla oli lapsia monista eri miehistä (muttei tiettävästi Sopesta). Kun Sope pakeni Berliinistä koleraa 1831, sitä johon Hegel kuoli kun tuli kotiin liian aikaisin, se ois ottanut tän haahkan mukaan, se ei tahtonut, Sope antoi sille rahaa, mutta kielsi käyttämästä sitä lapsenruokkoihin. Se näki jotain näkyjä ja innostui joxkin aikaa paranormaaleista ilmiöistä, kai se toivoi sillä todistavansa tahdon toimintaa. Siitäkään ei tullut lasta eikä paskaakaan.
    ellauri037.html on line 692: Michael Masiello on ope, esteetti, humanisti, joki porukoilleen (river to his people). Ajatusten Tonava. Ceausescu yllättyi kun kansa ei enää hurrannut. Ei tiennyt mitä ajatella siitä, joki tyrehtyi. Tahaton humanisti taas. Masin miälestä Sope on briljantti pessimisti, briljantimpi vielä kuin Masi, siis genius, se on myönnettävä ilman sarvia ja hampaita. Tän briljantin pointin lisäx Masi briljeeraa huomauttamalla lyöntivirheestä.
    ellauri037.html on line 711: Johann Christoph Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805) oli lääkäri. Runoilikin, filosofoi, historioi, dramatiseerasi, lyrisoi ja yritteli esseitä.
    ellauri038.html on line 28: suullisessa viestinnässä eikä panopuuhissa. Tää on ihan ensikäden tietoa.
    ellauri038.html on line 45: "If this were only cleared away,"
    ellauri038.html on line 148: I go everywhere in my student coat, now and then slap someone on the back and say … Is everything okay? I am God, and this farce is my creation.
    ellauri038.html on line 152: I’m not saying that Nietzsche thought he was God before his breakdown. But he understood the parallel between the creator God and the creator of values. Values must be self-justifying; anything that requires an argument is vulnerable.
    ellauri038.html on line 154: As for why this deserves to be called philosophy, it depends on how we define the term. There were philosophers at Athens besides Socrates and Plato, who didn’t oppose philosophy to rhetoric and for whom personal authority was essential to their teaching. Nietzsche aimed to bring that back, at least in his own case – which is the only one that really mattered to him.
    ellauri038.html on line 182: Koska hänen isänsä oli yhteiskunnallisesti merkittävässä asemassa, Weber varttui politiikantäyteisessä kodissa, jossa vierailivat usein merkittävät oppineet ja julkiset hahmot. Siitä tuli selväksi, että Max Weber oli älyllisesti erittäin lahjakas. Hänen lahjansa vanhemmilleen vuonna 1876 koostui kahdesta esseestä, joiden otsikot olivat ”Saksan historian kulku erityisesti viitaten keisariin ja paaviin” sekä ”Rooman keisarillinen aika Konstantinus Suuresta kansainvaelluksiin”. Ize kudottu pannulappu ois ollut lämpimämpi lahjaidea.
    ellauri038.html on line 184: 1882 Weber kirjoittautui Heidelbergin yliopistoon lakitieteen opiskelijaksi palvellen samalla "toisinaan" Saksan armeijassa. 1886 Weber läpäisi alemman oikeustutkinnon. 1880-luvun ajan Weber jatkoi historian opiskelua. Hän sai tohtorinarvon lakitieteessä 1889 kirjoittamalla keskiajan liikeorganisaatioita käsittelevän väikkärin. Kaksi vuotta myöhemmin Weber sai valmiiksi habilitaatioväitöskirjan Die Römische Agrargeschichte in ihrer Bedeutung für das Staats- und Privatrecht. Yhtään pannulappua?
    ellauri038.html on line 200: Marianne Schnitger was born on 2 August 1870 in Oerlinghausen to medical doctor Eduard Schnitger and his wife, Anna Weber, daughter of a prominent Oerlinghausen businessman Karl Weber. After the death of her mother in 1873, she moved to Lemgo and was raised for the next fourteen years by her grandmother and aunt. During this time, both her father and his two brothers went mad and were institutionalized. When Marianne turned 16, Karl Weber sent her off to fashionable finishing schools in Lemgo and Hanover, from which she graduated when she was 19. After the death of her grandmother in 1889, she lived several years with her mother´s sister, Alwine, in Oerlinghausen.
    ellauri038.html on line 202: During the first few years of their marriage, Max taught in Berlin, then, in 1894, at the University of Heidelberg. During this time, Marianne pursued her own studies. After moving to Freiburg in 1894, she studied with a leading neo-Kantian philosopher, Heinrich Rickert. She also began to engage herself in the women´s movement after hearing prominent feminist speakers at a political congress in 1895. In 1896, in Heidelberg, she co-founded a society for the circulation of feminist thought. She also worked with Max to raise the level of women students attending the university. Max found them deplorably charmless.
    ellauri038.html on line 204: In 1898, Max suffered a psychological collapse, possibly brought on after his father´s death, which happened shortly after Max confronted him regarding his abuse of Helene. Between 1898 and 1904, Max withdrew from public life, moving in and out of mental institutions, traveling compulsively and resigning from his prominent position at University of Heidelberg.
    ellauri038.html on line 206: During this time, their roles reversed somewhat; as Max worked toward recovery and rested at home, Marianne attended political meetings, sometimes until late at night, and published her first book in 1900: Fichtes Sozialismus und sein Verhältnis zur Marxschen Doktrin ("Fichte's Socialism and its Relation to Marxist Doctrine"). Marianne vaikuttaa vasemmistolaisemmalta, järki-ihmiseltä Maxiin verrattuna.
    ellauri038.html on line 210: In 1907, Karl Weber died, and left enough money to his granddaughter Marianne for the Webers to live comfortably. During this time, Marianne first established her intellectual salon. Between 1907 and the start of World War I, Marianne enjoyed a rise in her status as an intellectual and a scholar as she published "The Question of Divorce" (1909), "Authority and Autonomy in Marriage" (1912) and "On the Valuation of Housework" (1912), and "Women and Objective Culture" (1913). The Webers presented a united front in public life. Max defended his wife from her scholarly detractors but carried on an affair with Else Jaffe, a mutual friend.
    ellauri038.html on line 212: In 1914, World War I broke out. While Max busied himself publishing his multi-volume study of religion, lecturing, organizing military hospitals, serving as an adviser in peace negotiations and running for office in the new Weimar Republic, Marianne published many works, among which were: "The New Woman" (1914), "The Ideal of Marriage" (1914), "War as an Ethical Problem" (1916), "Changing Types of University Women" (1917), "The Forces Shaping Sexual Life" (1919) and "Women's Special Cultural Tasks" (1919).
    ellauri038.html on line 216: Following Max's unexpected death, Marianne withdrew from public and social life, funneling her physical and psychological resources into preparing ten volumes of her husband's writing for publication. In 1924, she received an honorary doctoral degree from the University of Heidelberg, both for her work in editing and publishing Max's work as well as for her own scholarship. Between 1923 and 1926, Weber worked on Max Weber: Ein Lebensbild ("Max Weber: A Biography"), which was published in 1926.[15] Also in 1926, she re-established her weekly salon, and entered into a phase of public speaking in which she spoke to audiences of up to 5,000. During this phase, she continued to raise Lili's children with the help of a close-knit circle of friends
    ellauri038.html on line 222: Maxens Leitmotiv war der okzidentale Rationalismus und die damit bewirkte Entzauberung der Welt. Eine Schlüsselstellung in diesem historischen Prozess war der moderne Kapitalismus als die „schicksalsvollste Macht unseres modernen Lebens“. In der Wahl dieses Forschungsschwerpunktes zeigte sich eine Nähe zu seinem Antipoden Karl Marx, die ihm auch die Bezeichnung „der bürgerliche Marx“ eintrug. Hyi helkkari.
    ellauri038.html on line 298: Nietzscheä hirvitti Schopenhauerin ajatus, jonka mukaan jokainen ihminen, joka varauksetta hyväksyy elämän, hyväksyy samalla sen, että hänen elämänsä toistuu sellaisenaan loputtomasti. Nietzsche itse piti tätä ikuisen paluun ajatusta ”kauhistuttavana ja halvaannuttavana”, mikäli se ymmärretään kosmologisena totuutena.
    ellauri038.html on line 428: Lea olisi kuitenkin hiihdellyt ovenrakoon sähisemään.

    ellauri038.html on line 496: Suomen historian ehkä mikroskooppisin suurmies Sauli Niinistö

    ellauri039.html on line 196: kuin koira ja kissa haukutaan ja sähistään?


    ellauri039.html on line 325: Niinpä. Vyötärö on paxu, mut kazanto on kapea. Sivistystä ei enää minkäänlaista, ei sydämen eikä pään. Keneltähän tässä puuttuu historian tajua. Näitä wannabe kultapossuja nousee joka polvessa. Self employed freelance journalisti Haisu Pervonen on ehkä tietämättään sellainen.
    ellauri039.html on line 355: Work currently in progress at the Mt Holyoke mental hospital is an ancient Japanese game involving paper, stone and scissors. The winning strategy in this game has been worked out by prof. Jokohama Kumahuta (Stanford): Take all three and bash them in the face of the long-nosed lover in prosperity and in adversity.
    ellauri039.html on line 398: This unit deals with the statement "I am from Germany" as an inclusive identity for people who live in Germany today. The material is aimed at second-year German students. The goal of the unit is to show the diversity of people who live in Germany, to inform the students about how Germans and non-Germans are differentiated, to allow students to experience some attitudes held by and against certain groups of people living in Germany, and to expect students to have an awareness of what it can mean when someone says "I am from Germany." The REFLECTION section can be found in each of the various subsections of the unit.
    ellauri039.html on line 402: Learners in grades 10, 11, or 12 are presented with a literature and music-based unit on the realities of Germany since the World War II with the major focus on the period after the fall of the Wall in 1989. The literature comprises a number of different types of texts; they include adapted selections from Auf Sand gebaut and Filz by Stefan Heym, an Eastern German, and Der Mauerspringer by Peter Schneider, a Western German. The music is a poem "Ännchen von Tharau" by Simon Dach, adapted by Johann Gottfried Herder in his 1778 collection "Stimmen der Völker in Liedern."
    ellauri039.html on line 406: The music is a folksong that spans four centuries; and the students become aware of the continuity of German culture through folksongs.The background material is disseminated in the form of pictures, statistics, and a historical time-line. Motivation and interest is generated through the songs which focus the learner on the fact that the lesson involves products of German culture. While reading, the learners are confronted not just with the separation of Germany, but also with the division of the Germans in Germany. On the cognitive level, learners gather information about Germany's recent past from World War II to the present. Given these facts the learners connect the past with the German's recent fixation on "Vergangenheits- und Gegenwartsbewältigung." Learners take this theoretical information and explore sites found on the Internet where they find information in German on the issue of identity. This activity forms the basis for reaching a consensus on such questions as:
    ellauri039.html on line 432: Eli lopultakin asiaan: mites tällä voi nyt rikastua? Mitä uusia bisnesmahixia nyt kun ei ole muuri esteenä ja historia on lopussa, kuten huomauttaa Jokohama Fukuyama (1952, siis mun ikäinen), saxen kanssa riehunutta sievää leidiä 19 vuotta vanhempi Yodan näköinen Stanfordin neropatti?
    ellauri039.html on line 434: Yoda varmaan seuraa historian pysähtymistä siitä Helsingin rautatieaseman tornia muistuttavasta Stanfordin yliopiston maamerkistä, jossa sijaizi äärioikeiston Hoover-instituutti. Palmut huojuilevat tuulessa nostaen päitään korkealle, ilmastonmuutoxesta piittaamatta kuin Simo Katon runossa. Luonnonkatastrofit jatkaa siitä mihin historia lopetti.
    ellauri039.html on line 441:

    This is Us. Iloisesti virnistäviä jenkkejä hampaisiin asti aseistettuina maailman vapaimmassa maassa. Niitä neuvotaan hymyilemään valokuvissa niin, että alahampaat näkyvät, se vaikuttaa avoimemmalta. Tyyppi oikealla osaa konstin. Eläköön perustuslain 2. korjaus! Eläkööt ne joita korona ei tapa! Se on kaikki kotiinpäin! God bless America! MAGA MAGA!
    ellauri039.html on line 450: maailmanhistorian aikana.

    ellauri039.html on line 460: historia oli loppu, rauha maassa

    ellauri039.html on line 465: No eipä aikaakaan niin voi kauhistus

    ellauri039.html on line 469: ja kohta kuolemakin historiaa.

    ellauri039.html on line 505: Yes, I came from America and I've lived in Tampere for 4 years, soon 5. I will say this, Finland is far beyond America in a lot of ways.
    ellauri039.html on line 515: Education, okay, well this one is a two bladed sword. I am studying finnish currently, and while they do suck at teaching their own language but they are teaching about proper nutrition! Which is pretty awesome if you ask me. It's great that they want to make sure even immigrants, like me, are healthy!
    ellauri039.html on line 521: For me, a developed nation is one in which it cares for it´s people. That accepts science when it says “this affects your health negatively", and says “we don't want our people sick"
    ellauri039.html on line 722: Camus vietti lapsuutensa ja nuoruutensa Algeriassa, joka silloin oli yksi Ranskan lääneistä, osa Ranskaa. Hänen isänsä kaatui ensimmäisessä maailmansodassa, kun Albert oli vuoden ikäinen, ja poika eli köyhissä oloissa kuuron äitinsä ja isoäitinsä kanssa. Myös Albertin eno oli kuuro. Albert opiskeli lukiossa ja aloitti filosofian opinnot yliopistossa, mutta ne keskeytyivät hänen sairastuttuaan tubiin. Camus liittyi 21-vuotiaana Algerian kommunistiseen puolueeseen, mutta hänet erotettiin kaksi vuotta myöhemmin. Hyvä kamu! Et kelvannut edes cameradexi.
    ellauri039.html on line 738: Ne jotka olivat tavoitelleet jotakin määrittelemätöntä, sellaista, mikä oli enemmän kuin ihminen, eivät olleet saaneet vastausta. Eivätpä tietenkään, tyhjää tavoittelevat. Mitä tekee rauhalla, jonka saa vasta kuollessa? Eipä paljon paskaakaan. Ne olivat tyytyväisiä, jotka kapsahtivat katajaan muina miehinä, joille riitti ihminen ja hänen niukka, kauhistuttava rakkautensa.
    ellauri039.html on line 740: No ei se ole sen kauhistuttavampi kuin esim. rotilla tai lepakoilla. Tai siileillä. Siilit kääntää piikit lamaan kun ne bylsivät, etteivät tahattomasti pistäisi toinen toistansa. Siilit ovat kivoja, sanoi tohtori Pauli Pylkkänen vielä vanhana miehenä, vaikka oli ollut nuorena mukana samassa sodassa tuomizemassa eläviä ja kuolleita.
    ellauri039.html on line 745: Ukko nauraa kähisi.
    ellauri039.html on line 768: Edward Morgan Forster OM CH (1 January 1879 – 7 June 1970) was an English novelist, short story writer, essayist and librettist. Many of his novels examine class difference and hypocrisy, including A Room with a View (1908), Howards End (1910) and A Passage to India (1924). The last brought him his greatest success. He was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature in 16 different years.
    ellauri039.html on line 776: The Forsyte Saga, first published under that title in 1922, is a series of three novels and two interludes published between 1906 and 1921 by Nobel Prize–winning English author John Galsworthy. They chronicle the vicissitudes of the leading members of a large, upper-middle-class English family, similar to Galsworthy´s family. Only a few generations removed from their farmer ancestors, the family members are keenly aware of their status as "new money". The main character, Soames Forsyte, sees himself as a "man of property" by virtue of his ability to accumulate material possessions – but this does not succeed in bringing him pleasure.
    ellauri040.html on line 46: Buschissa on vähän 7 veljexen Simeonia. Simeonissa oli enemmän kuin vähän Alexis Kiveä, Lapinlahden lintua. Pitkä ja luiseva kuin se, ja synkkämielinen. Niinkuin monet humoristit. Ilo pintaan kun syän märkänee. No ei kai Wilho ollut anders, siis schwul, sillä oli kyllä yritystä naisiin muttei rahaa. Ei ollut kiltti ja ahkera kuin Woku, vaan äreä ja tyly doku. Tylsäxi ei voi sentään sanoa, sitä sano Calle musta hääpuheessa. Laiha lohdutus. Paremmat witzit kuin Schopenhauerilla ainakin, vaikka yhtä happamet. Siis Wilho Puskalla.
    ellauri040.html on line 70: Sitäpaizi nää mun omat paasauxetkin on kuin postmodernistin käsikirjasta, lainauxia ja viittauxia muualle on niin helvatisti, ettei mezää viitakosta erota. Samanlaista kaiken sikin sokin latelemista kiittelevät siantappajat mm. beatnikilta William S. Burroughs-vainajalta (1914, yhtä vainaan mainframe-tietokoneen lähisukulaiselta ja ikätoverilta, jonka konetta mäkin olen joskus opiskelijana käyttänyt), ja Kathy Ackerilta (1947), joka sai siltä vaikutteita, kuolivatkin vuonna 1997 kumpikin.
    ellauri040.html on line 122:

    Filosofien historia pohjalta pohjalle


    ellauri040.html on line 176: Sen tässä oppis ellei jo osaisi, että on taottava kun rauta on kuuma ja nuori veri kuohuu, kohta on vanha ja kaikki myöhäistä. Opsimathes lällättäjän lällätys on yhtä joutavaa kuin 80-vuotiaan kreikanopinnot. Ristikoiden ratkaisusta on sama hyöty. Sillä kohta naxuu saxet ja katkee lanka niin lällätetyiltä kuin lällättäjältä. Ja sit on kummallakin enää enintään historiallista mielenkiintoa.
    ellauri040.html on line 180: No on tää kyllä varsin tuhnua. Ei ihme jos piipunrassit pillastuivat. Ja ne insinöörit, Hyry ja Tuuri, on kyllä nekin hurjan tuhnuja, ja putkiaivoja. You may have a point there, sanoisi KJJ, joka piti C.P. Snowsta. Vaan eipä enää sano mitään. Silläkin on enää historiallista mielenkiintoa. Nyt jyrää samanniminen salibandyn pelaaja. Jolla tuskin on tähän mitään lisättävää.
    ellauri040.html on line 184: Biograafista metodia pojat haukkuu epä-älyllisexi. Mitä vittua!? Tässähän sitä juuri harjoittaa eräs yliopiston älykkäimmistä miehistä.
    ellauri040.html on line 219: Onnexi. Tylsäxihän se muuten kävisi. Retoriikalla pidetään valamiehistö ja yleisö hereillä oikeudenkäynnin aikana. Kristina lukee koronakaranteenissa Xavier de Maistrea, joka tekee löytöretkiä omassa kopissa kuin Make.
    ellauri040.html on line 275: Jos tarkastelemme kirjallisuuden historiaa (ja mitäs muuta me tässä juuri teemme), niin kaikki viittaa mieheen, hänen ahistuxeensa, hänen haluunsa olla naisen perseessä. Kirjallisuuden ja kullisentrismin välillä on sisäinen side (tampooni).
    (Helene Cicciolino)
    ellauri040.html on line 327: The generation born completely within the technological age, war on terror, and multiculturalism. This generation is the first true global culture as their characteristics and trend is more uniform across the globe as they become the most open minded generation to date.
    ellauri040.html on line 333: More recently metamodernism, post-postmodernism and the "death of postmodernism" have been widely debated: in 2007 Andrew Hoberek noted in his introduction to a special issue of the journal Twentieth Century Literature titled "After Postmodernism" that "declarations of postmodernism's demise have become a critical commonplace". A small group of critics has put forth a range of theories that aim to describe culture or society in the alleged aftermath of postmodernism, most notably Raoul Eshelman (performatism), Gilles Lipovetsky (hypermodernity), Nicolas Bourriaud (altermodern), and Alan Kirby (digimodernism, formerly called pseudo-modernism). None of these new theories or labels have so far gained very widespread acceptance. Sociocultural anthropologist Nina Müller-Schwarze offers neostructuralism as a possible direction.
    ellauri040.html on line 348: Gilles Deleuze (18. tammikuuta 1925 Pariisi – 4. marraskuuta 1995 Pariisi) oli ranskalainen filosofi, joka tuli tunnetuksi filosofian historian reunahahmojen (Nietzsche, Spinoza) luovista uudelleenluennoista sekä uuden ajattelun ja käsitteiden kehittämisestä. Deleuze kirjoitti filosofian lisäksi kirjallisuudesta, maalaustaiteesta, musiikista ja sosiologiasta. Hän kehitteli olemisen yksiäänisyyden, eron ja moneuden ontologiaa sekä tapahtuman filosofiaa ja pyrki kertomansa mukaan etsimään suurta Baruch Spinozan ja Friedrich Nietzschen ajattelun ykseyttä. Ei löytynyt. Deleuze poistui pettyneenä ikkunasta vinon kiven alle työntämään koiranputkea.
    ellauri040.html on line 522: Du var på samma gång ångvält, pansarvagn, gödselspridare och förhistorisk elefant. En papput. Det ingick inte i ditt livsuppdrag att känna efter. Du manglade vidare och delade ut en kanonad av käftsmällar med dina ord. Vid de tillfällen där du närmast ofrivilligt stannade upp och log med gnistrande ögon, förlät och beundrade alla dig omedelbart.
    ellauri040.html on line 590: Adam Mickiewicz was born in the East of the former Polish-Lithuanian state. Because of that he called Lithuania his mother-country. Eka ajattelin et ompa outoa, Puolan kansalliseepos Liettuasta, mut kelaa: onhan Kalevalakin Karjalan laulumailta.
    ellauri041.html on line 198: Syrjälä näyttää ja kertoo, miten kyrvän kylmäaltistus on hänelle tärkeä työkalu, jolla hän pitää työkalunsa kunnossa. Mutta nyt kädet pois pyyhkeen alta ja asiaan. Teemu kokee muidenkin miehisyyden olevan muutostilassa. Enää ei riitä miehen jurottaa heinäpellon laidalla, puhumatta tunteista tai mistään muustakaan. Tuurin ja Hyryn loistoajat ovat peruuttamattomasti ohize. Mikä neuvoxi?
    ellauri041.html on line 262: Calvinoa 80-luvulla jo ahisti globalisaation aikaansaama yhtenäiskulttuuri ja kivettyneet kaupallisen viihdetehtailun monokultturiset genret, missä et voi kuin loxahtaa johkin etukäteen määrätyistä tarinoista, tai lukijat / kazojat pettyvät. Kun valkkaat netflixistä jonkun pätkän, pikku ai-robotit tunnistaa sun taipumuxet ja suosittelee nippua lähes vastaavia kokemuxia. Toimii kuin junan vessa.
    ellauri041.html on line 309: Weimar läntisessä itä-Saxassa oli saxan sydän, ja preussi eli loput itäsaxasta sen pallit. Hitlerin vallankaappaus lähti Weimarin tasavallan epäjärjestyxestä. Uusnazien johtoslaavi asuu Göttingenin ja Erfurtin lähellä, koska siellä uusnazien kannatus on 25%, sen kotiseudulla lännessä se oli vaan 10%. Persut on laskukkaita, joita kauhistaa varattoman väestön vaihto vielä köyhempiin mutta nöyrempiin savunaamaisiin ja karvakätisiin maahanmuuttajiin. Itäeurooppalaiset pettyivät usaan, länteen ja talousliberalismiin, kun kävi ilmi, että niistä tuli länkkäreiden mamuja, sama riistoa vaan toisessa mittakaavassa. Ize asiassa kaikki ovat pettyneet kun unelmasta tuli jotain pahmpaa kuin valhe. Olimmeko sittenkin väärässä, sanoi kenialainen hörökorva neekeri ja antoi tilaa Trumpille. Kukaan ei ole tyytyväinen enää nyt korona-aikaan, pieleen meni mutta menköön, sanoo ökyrikkaatkin ja piileskelee ökyjahdeilla. Korjataan vahinko seuraavasa jaxossa.
    ellauri041.html on line 315: Ei vielä. Vaan ootapas, kunhan tästä kulkutaudista vähän toivutaan, niin kohta tulee veizet esiin ja alkaa viuhua, ja pyssyt paukkua kaikkialla maailmassa, entistä suuremmalla syyllä ja innolla. Holokausti oli saxan historian konepeltiä rumentava pieni pulunpaska, ja koleraepidemia maailman mittakaavassa vain pieni lepakonkökkäre.
    ellauri041.html on line 336: Uneliaassa pikkukaupungissa lähellä Pariisia Joel Ranto ystävystyy huolintaliikkeen omistavaan Marcel Daignaultiin, joka on entinen historian lehtori. Vaimonsa traagisesti menettänyt Marcel on palannut pikku pullon hukanneena Pariisista takaisin synnyinkaupunkiinsa - ja isänsä firmaan.
    ellauri041.html on line 371: Tuula Johanna Arkio (o.s. Olamo, s. 2. huhtikuuta 1943 Helsinki) on suomalainen taidehistorioitsija ja taidemuseonjohtaja. Vuonna 2006 hänet promovoitiin Kuvataideakatemian kunniatohtoriksi[2] ja hänelle myönnettiin kulttuurineuvoksen arvonimi. Arkio johti Kiasmaa vuosina 1990–2000 ja Valtion taidemuseota 2000–2006.
    ellauri041.html on line 472: Moosexen palavaxi pensaaxi se oli liian kiinnostunut pahasta bushista.
    ellauri042.html on line 31: Tähän valkkaamani kuva oli yx mun suosikkeja. Siitä olis Lassikin varmaan pitänyt. Olikohan Lassin piirtäjällä sama kirja pienenä? (Ei kai kerta sen ekat dinosaurusstripit ei olleet yhtä näköisiä.) Tyrannosaurus Rex siinä rähisee kahdelle ankkasauruxelle (Trachodon), jotka näyttää vähän väisteleviltä. Suunnittelee varmaan vetäytymistä ankkalammikkoon. Ne on vähän kuin rannikolla asuvia ruozalaisia, joiden mielestä suomalaisten tyrannimaisten, koronasairaiden kesävieraiden olis paras pysytellä kotona.
    ellauri042.html on line 87: when this monster came to town kun tää hirmulisko tuli kaupunkiin,
    ellauri042.html on line 88: and ate some folks this a.m.! ja veti joukon porukoita kitusiin!
    ellauri042.html on line 99: with his brother Howard. Wilho weljen kanssa, karkkirasioita
    ellauri042.html on line 105: a live report. At this they failed, mutta suora lähetys jäi pois purkista,
    ellauri042.html on line 107: At last the menace ate his fill, Tyrannosauri sai kerrankin kylläxeen.
    ellauri042.html on line 146: stupefied horror! Which vasten kauhistuneina! Kuka
    ellauri042.html on line 189: Maapallon biosfäärin historian voisi kuvata tuotantokausina kuin teeveesarjat,

    ellauri042.html on line 212: What’s missing from this chart is just as important
    ellauri042.html on line 216: The authors of the PNAS article estimate that the mass of wild land mammals is seven times lower than it was before humans arrived (keep in mind it’s difficult to estimate the exact history of the number of animals on Earth). Similarly, marine mammals, including whales, are a fifth of the weight they used to be because we’ve hunted so many to near extinction.
    ellauri042.html on line 435: Samana yönä tuli taas mieleen vanha ajatus siitä, miten historia toistaa izeään aivan hirvittävän tarkasti. Otetaan vaikka antiikki ja keskiaika, ja nykyaika. Kreikka nousi Välimeren kauppamahdixi Foinikian rinnalla, kunnes laivapuut loppui Hellaan niemeltä, Kreikka köyhtyi ja kauppa siirtyi lännemmäxi, Sisiliaan, ja Aleksanterin aikaan etelämmäxi Egyptiin ja idemmäxi Persiaan. Saapasmaan ettoneelta heräilevät maajussit piristyivät maahanmuutosta, rökittivät etruskit ja
    ellauri042.html on line 438: Roomalaiset vietti ökyelämää naapureiden selkänahasta, niinkauan kun taloudessa oli kasvuräjähdys. 200-luvulla, kun pyhä Antonius mellasti Egyptissä, oli Egyptissä aika lailla samat fiilixet kuin on nykyään jossain Euroopassa. Mutta eipä aikaakaan niin voi kauhistus, jonkinlainen pikku jääkausi iski, ja porukoita lähti liikkeelle pohjoisesta, matelija-aivoisia nuijamiehiä, jotka vähin erin nuijivat suurvallan lysyyn, se hajosi taas pienemmixi valloixi, kulttuurit ja kielet hajaantuivat taas.
    ellauri042.html on line 442: Mutta eipä aikaakaan niin voi kauhistus, ilmastonmuutoxen kuuma aalto iski, ja porukoita lähti liikkeelle etelästä ja idästä, matelija-aivoisia nuijamiehiä, jotka vähin erin ovat nuijimassa nurin jenkkihegemoniaa. Nyt ei MAGA näytäkkään niin voittamattomalta enää, kun siellä heilutaan aseet kädessä taudin kourissa, ja valtakunnan henkisenä johtajana on ihan Neron ja Caligulan painoluokan idiootti. Mitä seuraavaxi? Jos vanhat merkit pitää paikkansa, tiedossa on väestönvaihto, suurvaltain hajoaminen taas pikkuvalloixi. Pian henkiinjääneet ajaa vanhoilla heimosotien jättämillä ylijäämäromuilla aavikoituvassa maisemassa kuin Mad Max.
    ellauri042.html on line 488: This is by far the very worst movie I have ever seen. I took a chance and gave it a try at the cinema back in 2017. 5-7 persons left the cinema in anger of how bad it was. I only made this account to make this review.

    ellauri042.html on line 490: 3 out of 7 found this helpful

    ellauri042.html on line 492: Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote

    ellauri042.html on line 500: Despite references to the family patriarch as "God", this isn't a fantasy story. Word of God is set very much in the real world. It's a vignette rather than a plot-driven story, a tale of a cranky man and how his wife and three sons deal with him while trying to maintain their dignity and sanity.

    ellauri042.html on line 502: The youngest son narrates the tale. He, his brothers, and his mother are all sympathetic characters, relatively normal people, though each has their own beliefs, quirks, and problems. The failure of my-way-or-the-highway Dad to show respect or even empathy for those who disagree drives the story. He could have been portrayed as an easy person to hate, but even with his limitations, it's obvious he is still trying to do good. To that extent, this film succeeds.

    ellauri042.html on line 504: Vignettes are usually less than totally satisfying, lacking resolutions commensurate with their conflicts. But this story, despite its interesting situation and fine production, feels emptier than most, because the resolution is largely driven not by action but by happenstance. Since Word of God is an autobiographical piece, I can't argue with what it shows, but the result seems to lack impact or message.

    ellauri042.html on line 508: 0 out of 0 found this helpful

    ellauri042.html on line 516: Watched this on television.. if i could rate it 0, it´d still be to good for this movie.

    ellauri042.html on line 518: 1 out of 2 found this helpful

    ellauri042.html on line 520: Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
    ellauri042.html on line 596: The French novelist Alphonse Daudet kept a journal of the pain he experienced from this condition which was posthumously published as La Doulou (1930) and translated into English as In the Land of Pain (2002) by Julian Barnes.
    ellauri042.html on line 598: Poet Charles Baudelaire contracted syphilis in 1839 and resorted to opium to help alleviate the pain of tabes dorsalis ascending his spine.
    ellauri042.html on line 602: Maupassant tried to take his own life by cutting his throat; failing even that, he was committed to the private asylum of Esprit Blanche at Passy, in Paris, where he died on 6 July 1893 from syphilis. Maupassant penned his own epitaph: "I have coveted everything and taken pleasure in nothing."
    ellauri042.html on line 644: Part of Pope's bitter inspiration for the characters in the book come from his soured relationship with the royal court. The Princess of Wales Caroline of Ansbach, wife of George II, had supported Pope in her patronage of the arts. When she and her husband came to the throne in 1727 she had a much busier schedule and thus had less time for Pope who saw this oversight as a personal slight against him. When planning the Dunciad he based the character Dulness on Queen Caroline, as the fat, lazy and dull wife. Pope's bitterness against Caroline was a typical trait of his brilliant but unstable character. The King of the Dunces as the wife of Dulness was based on George II. Pope makes his views on the first two Georgian kings very clear in the Dunciad when he writes 'Still Dunce the second reigns like Dunce the first'.
    ellauri042.html on line 648: The plot of the poem is simple. Dulness, the goddess, appears at a Lord Mayor's Day in 1724 and notes that her king, Elkannah Settle, has died. She chooses Lewis Theobald as his successor. In honour of his coronation, she holds heroic games. He is then transported to the Temple of Dulness, where he has visions of the future. The poem has a consistent setting and time, as well. Book I covers the night after the Lord Mayor's Day, Book II the morning to dusk, and Book III the darkest night. Furthermore, the poem begins at the end of the Lord Mayor's procession, goes in Book II to the Strand, then to Fleet Street (where booksellers were), down by Bridewell Prison to the Fleet ditch, then to Ludgate at the end of Book II; in Book III, Dulness goes through Ludgate to the City of London to her temple.
    ellauri042.html on line 652: Pope's choice of new 'hero' for the revised Dunciad, Colley Cibber, the pioneer of sentimental drama and celebrated comic actor, was the outcome of a long public squabble that originated in 1717, when Cibber introduced jokes onstage at the expense of a poorly received farce, Three Hours After Marriage, written by Pope with John Arbuthnot and John Gay. Pope was in the audience and naturally infuriated, as was Gay, who got into a physical fight with Cibber on a subsequent visit to the theatre. Pope published a pamphlet satirising Cibber, and continued his literary assault until his death, the situation escalating following Cibber's politically motivated appointment to the post of poet laureate in 1730.
    ellauri042.html on line 657: An anecdote in "A Letter from Mr. Cibber, to Mr. Pope", published in 1742, recounts their trip to a brothel organised by Pope's own patron, who apparently intended to stage a cruel joke at the expense of the poet. Since Pope was only about 4' tall, with a hunchback, due to a childhood tubercular infection of the spine, and the prostitute specially chosen as Pope's 'treat' was the fattest and largest on the premises, the tone of the event is fairly self-apparent. Cibber describes his 'heroic' role in snatching Pope off of the prostitute's body, where he was precariously perched like a tom-tit, while Pope's patron looked on, sniggering, thereby saving English poetry. While Cibber's elevation to laureateship in 1730 had further inflamed Pope against him, there is little speculation involved in suggesting that Cibber's anecdote, with particular reference to Pope´s "little-tiny manhood", motivated the revision of hero.
    ellauri042.html on line 665: All the transports described in this section do have more or less clear organic determinants (though it was not evident to begin with, but required careful investigation to bring out). This does not detract in the least from their spiritual significance. If God, or the Devil, or the eternal order EAT! EAT! FUCK! FUCK! KILL! KILL!, was revealed to Dostoievski in seizures, why should not other organic conditions serve as 'portals' to the beyond or the unknown? In a tongue in cheek sense, this section is a study of such portals.
    ellauri042.html on line 669: Kuuntelin Easter Paradea starrin Judy Garland ja Fred Astaire. Kyllä se olikin syvältä perseestä. Hanurimusiikkia Jenkeistä. Fred on niin homon näköinen et on vaikee uskoa. Fred Astaire may have married twice and had children, but Gore Vidal told his nephew he shafted the famous dancer and actor in Hollywood. Olen pederasti, sanoi Vidal toimittajalle. Have a nice day! sanoi taxikuski Vidalille. No, I have other plans for the day, Vidal läppäsi. Se kävi paljon Bangkokissa. Harri Jäppinen kävi Indonesiassa.
    ellauri042.html on line 674: Käsineidon tarina on Margaret Atwoodin kirjoittama kirja 80-luvulta, HBO:n filmatisoima 2020, Gileadin eli ex-USA:n historia. Saastuneen ja lämmenneen maailman suurin ongelma on että naiset ei enää saa lapsia. Hyvin masentava ajatus. Masentavinta siinä on että se on dystopia. Kun Gileadin pojat räjäyttää Washington DC:n suon ja pääsee kasan pinnalle, ne välittömästi palauttaa patriarkaatin ja panee naiset takaisin naisten paikalle. A Woman´s Place on huippulaihan komendantittaren pamfletti, johon ei enää tule jatkoa, koska eka osa on just toteutettu. Oops, olikohan tää nyt tarkoitus, miettii komendöörskän kuikelo.
    ellauri042.html on line 686: 5 years older Gibson was married to publisher Shirley Gibson until the early 1970s, and together they had two sons, Matt and Grae. He later began dating novelist and poet Margaret Atwood in 1973. They moved to a semi-derelict farm near Alliston, Ontario, which they set about doing up and where according to Atwood they were making "attempts at farming, writing and trying to earn enough to live". Their daughter Eleanor Jess Atwood Gibson was born there in 1976. The family returned to Toronto in 1980. Atwood and Gibson stayed together until his death in 2019. Gibsons best book was The Bedside Book of Birds (2005).
    ellauri042.html on line 688: In 2017 Gibson was diagnosed with early signs of vascular dementia. He died on 18 September 2019 in London, England, where Atwood was promoting her new book, five days after having a big stroke. Atwood later said about his death that it had not been unexpected due to the vascular dementia, had been a good one—and in a good hospital, and his children had time to come and say goodbye—and that he had been "declining and he had wanted to check out before he reached any further stages of that".
    ellauri042.html on line 697: Dostoevsky´s literary work has strong autobiographical elements. We know from him that he suffered from hallucinations already in early childhood. He presented idiotic characters with confused views about freedom of choice, religion, socialism, atheism, good and evil. Many of his characters suffered – like the author himself – from epilepsy. Other famous people also suffered from epilepsy (Alexander the Great, Caesar, Gustave Flaubert, and Lord Byron). Flaubert had religiously tinted visions. The first 2 guys thought they were gods.
    ellauri042.html on line 699: Maria Fyodorovna Nechayeva, his mother, was descended from a conservative Moscow merchant family. Dostoevsky was educated at home and at a private school. The family lived in a very small apartment, which his father also used as a doctor´s practice. The patriarchal and avaricious character of his father was seminal for the personal and the artistic development of Fyodor.
    ellauri042.html on line 701: In 1833, the family moved to Tula where the father bought a manor. Shortly after the death of his mother in 1837, Fyodor (16 yrs) was sent to St. Petersburg where he entered the Army Engineering College. 2 years later, in 1839, Dostoevsky´s more and more tyrannical father died, probably of apoplexy, but there were strong rumours that he was murdered by his own serfs in a quarrel. (Unless it was Fedja who dunit.) Against the background of this legend, Sigmund Freud later interpreted the patricide in the novel “The brothers Karamazov” as showing Fedja hated his father´s guts. True, but the main thing was the epilepsy, wait and see.
    ellauri042.html on line 705: In Katorga, Dostoevsky spent four years in hard labour and wearing fetters, hating immigrants. During that time, Dostoevsky´s health dramatically deteriorated and he suffered from his first generalized epileptic attacks.
    ellauri042.html on line 706: The doctor wrote: “1850, he had his first epileptic attack with crying, amnesia, cloniform movements, foam around his mouth, and dyspnoea with weak and rapid pulsation of the heart. This first attack lasted for 15 min. The attack was followed by common exhaustion and reachievment of consciousness. 1853, he had another attack, and meanwhile, the attacks return at every end of the month”. During his Siberian years, Dostoevsky became a devout follower of the Russian Orthodox Church and a persuaded monarchist.
    ellauri042.html on line 708: During repeated trips to many European cities in the years 1862–1865, Dostoevsky got to know the complacence and arrogance of the aristocratic European ‘Bourgeoisie’. These experiences strengthened his slavophilic attitude and explain his xenophilia.
    ellauri042.html on line 710: Furthermore, his first wife, who was something of an impulse purchase, suffered from tuberculosis, so he had an impassionate affair with a young woman called Apollinaria Suslova on the side. It ended tragically due to his obsession with gambling. Beside of these blows he suffered from frequent epileptic seizures. At the bedside of his sick wife he wrote “Notes from Underground” (1864), a psychological study of an outsider. The work starts with a confession by the writer: “I am a sick man … I am a wicked man …” Fair enough.
    ellauri042.html on line 712: In 1864, Dostoevsky´s wife number one died at last, and shortly after he left Petersburg again to meet his beloved Apollinaria. The reunion with Apollinaria became a great failure, because he continued gambling.
    ellauri042.html on line 713: He returned to St. Petersburg impecuniously and started to write his novel “Crime and Punishment” (1866), which was followed by the novel “The Gambler” (1866), an honest testimonial of Dostoevsky´s own gambling which was written within a few weeks.
    ellauri042.html on line 715: On the 15th of February, 1867, Dostoevsky married Anna Grigoryevna Snitkina, his stenographer who seemed to have understood her husband´s manias and rages. Ten days later, Dostoevsky had an epileptic attack which was described in Anna Grigoryevna´s memories. Shouting, grinding teeth, kicking on the floor, saliva on the chin, the works.
    ellauri042.html on line 717: Dostoevsky´s illness influenced some peculiarities of his writing, his language and style. Dostoevsky´s bad memory was well known; he had to take notes for everything His language is nervous, tense and impulsive. His phrases are sometimes long and complicated, containing a fanciful conglomeration of colloquial words and expressions, official, journalistic and scientific terms, and slips of the tongue, foreign words, names and quotations. But now and then we can see here very short, elliptic phrases.
    ellauri042.html on line 719: Dostoevsky´s favorite word was “vdrug” (“suddenly”). A lot of events in Dostoevsky´s novels begin suddenly, without preparations and explanation – like seizures. (But he did at times have a manic aura just before.) Dostoevsky also used frequent repetitions of the same word with different intonations. It made an impression of convulsions and shocked the literary critics. He wrote in a meticulous manner, using every empty space of a sheet (see Fig. 2). His style showed a tendency toward extensive and in some cases compulsive writing, and the writings were often concerned with moral, ethical, or religious issues. This may reflect a syndrome of interictal behavior changes that was described in temporal lobe epilepsy by Waxman and Geschwind.
    ellauri042.html on line 730: There is no doubt that Dostoevsky´s writing witnesses a large awareness of and sometimes even obsession with religious, philosophical and emotional questions as well as question of guilt. Myshkin from the novel “The Idiot” shared many character traits with his creator, such as russophilia, hyperreligiosity with profound belief in the Russian-orthodox church, melancholy, auras of happiness, generalized seizures. Furthermore, Dostoevsky wrote in large letters, and his style was sometimes compulsive and abrupt.
    ellauri042.html on line 732: In conclusion, the exact classification of Dostoevsky´s idiocy is pretty clear. Many signs indicate that this famous writer suffered from mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
    ellauri042.html on line 804: Euclid’s fifth proposition in the first book of his Elements (that the base angles in an isosceles triangle are equal) may have been named the Bridge of Asses (Latin: Pons Asinorum) for medieval students who, clearly not destined to cross over into more abstract mathematics, had difficulty understanding the proof—or even the need for the proof. An alternative name for this famous theorem was Elefuga, which Roger Bacon, writing circa ad 1250, derived from Greek words indicating “escape from misery.” Medieval schoolboys did not usually go beyond the Bridge of Asses, which thus marked their last obstruction before liberation from the Elements.
    ellauri042.html on line 811: Sacks forbade any mention of his homosexuality, though he had told his would-be biographer Wechsler about his closeted yearnings and crippled attempts at love. His Boswell shelved the notes for 30 years. Ollie changed his mind on his deathbed: Do it! You must!
    ellauri042.html on line 813: In the meantime Ollie had published not one but two memoirs, with an exhaustive range of anecdotes, full of enchantment and anguish, covering everything from his all-consuming childhood obsession with the properties of metals to the abuse he endured at boarding school to his feeling, amphibian-like, more at home in water than on land to his mother’s reaction when she discovered his sexual orientation. “You are an abomination,” Ollie recounted her telling him when he was 18. “I wish you had never been born.” Nor had Ollie kept anything hidden. He described his first orgasm — reached spontaneously while floating in a swimming pool — and, in deft yet fairly pornographic detail, an agonized, inadvertent climax experienced much later while giving a massage to a man who shunned Ollie’s love.
    ellauri042.html on line 815: What had Sacks left to Weschler? What did his gift, his command, amount to beyond the dying wish of a magnificent and, by some accounts, paradoxically self-effacing and narcissistic doctor to have yet another book, beyond the 13 he himself had written (three more would come posthumously), to help ensure his immortality? Maybe this:
    ellauri042.html on line 817: His moronic patients called him “deeply eccentric” and described him as “huge, a full beard, black leather jacket covering T-shirts riddled with holes, huge shoes, his trousers looking like they were going to slide off his body.” A friend from Sacks’s days as a medical resident remembers him as a “big, free-ranging animal” who one day “drank some blood … chasing it with milk. There was something about his need to cross taboos. Back in those days, in the early ’60s, he was heavily into drugs, downing whole handfuls of them, especially speed and LSD.”
    ellauri042.html on line 844: From the early 20th century, his fictional work included caricatures of Jews, stereotyping them as greedy, cowardly, disloyal and communists.
    ellauri042.html on line 848: Chesterton, joka kääntyi aikuisiällä katoliseksi, ihaili sir Thomas Morea ja luonnehti tätä "Englannin historian suurimmaksi historialliseksi henkilöksi". Hän on myös saanut vaikutteita useilta henkilöiltä, kuten Tuomas Akvinolaiselta. Chesterton ei koskaan käyttänyt eikä hyväksynyt sanaa konservatiivi. Mut sellainen se oli. Ja vitun läski punkero. Sillä oli yhtä läski ja vielä katolisempi aisapari
    ellauri042.html on line 885: Devotions upon Emergent Occasions, or in full Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions, and severall steps in my Sicknes, is a prose work by the English metaphysical poet and cleric in the Church of England John Donne (22 January 1572 - 31 March 1631) , published in 1624. It covers death, rebirth and the Elizabethan concept of sickness as a French visit from God, reflecting internal sinfulness. The Devotions were written in December 1623 as Donne recovered from a serious but unknown illness – believed to be relapsing fever or typhus. Having come close to death, he described the illness he had suffered from and his thoughts throughout his recovery with "near super-human speed and concentration". Registered by 9 January, and published soon after, the Devotions is one of only seven works attributed to Donne which were printed during his lifetime.
    ellauri042.html on line 887: The Devotions is divided into 23 parts, each consisting of 3 sub-sections, called the 'meditation', the 'expostulation' and a prayer. The 23 sections are chronologically ordered, each covering his thoughts and reflections on a single day of the illness. The work as a whole is considered similar to 17th-century devotional writing generally, and particularly to Donne´s Holy Sonnets. Some academics have also identified political strands running through the work, possibly from a polemic Arminian denunciation of Puritanism to advise the young Prince Charles.
    ellauri042.html on line 893: Paizi eine enää asu siellä. Ne on eläkkeellä jossain pikku paikassa ja Nickillä on Parkinsonin tauti. Niillä oli tosi hieno talo Bathissa, varsinainen pikku palazi. Siellä oli kambrikauden aikaisia fossiileja. Nyt on fossiilit muuttaneet toiseen kaupunkiin.
    ellauri042.html on line 926: Princes do but play us; compared to this, Prinssit ei oo mitään tähän verrattuna,
    ellauri042.html on line 934: This bed thy center is, these walls, thy sphere. Tää peti on sun keskipiste, nää seinät kiertorata.
    ellauri042.html on line 937: John Donne is most commonly known for being part of the ‘metaphysical poets’, a group of poets who wrote about love and religion using complex metaphors called conceits. These poets didn’t know each other, and this name was given by literary critics some years later. Nevertheless, John Donne is considered to be one of the best metaphysical poets. John Donne converted to Anglicanism later in his life. By 1615 he became a priest because King James I ordered him to do so. Donne was a member of Parliament in 1601 and in 1614. He also spent a short time in prison because he married his wife, Anne More, without permission. They had twelve children and Anne died while extruding the XIIth.
    ellauri042.html on line 941: His father died in 1576, when Donne was four years old, leaving his mother, Elizabeth, with the responsibility of raising the children alone.[2] Heywood was also from a recusant Roman Catholic family, the daughter of John Heywood, the playwright, and sister of the Reverend Jasper Heywood, a Jesuit priest and translator.[2] She was also a great-niece of Thomas More. A few months after her husband died, Donne's mother married Dr. John Syminges, a wealthy widower with three children of his own.
    ellauri042.html on line 943: Donne's style is characterised by abrupt openings and various paradoxes, ironies and dislocations. These features, along with his frequent dramatic or everyday speech rhythms, his tense syntax and his tough eloquence, were both a reaction against the smoothness of conventional Elizabethan poetry and an adaptation into English of European baroque and mannerist techniques. His early career was marked by poetry that bore immense knowledge of English society. Another important theme in Donne´s poetry is the idea of true religion, something that he spent much time considering and about which he often theorised. He wrote secular poems as well as erotic and love poems. He is particularly famous for his mastery of metaphysical conceits.
    ellauri042.html on line 945: Despite his great education and poetic talents, Donne lived in poverty for several years, relying heavily on wealthy friends. He spent much of the money he inherited during and after his education on womanising, literature, pastimes, and travel. In 1601, Donne secretly married Anne More, with whom he had twelve children. In 1615 he was ordained Anglican deacon and then priest, although he did not want to take holy orders and only did so because the king ordered it. He also served as a member of Parliament in 1601 and in 1614.
    ellauri042.html on line 947: During the next four years, Donne fell in love with Egerton´s niece Anne More, and they were secretly married just before Christmas in 1601, against the wishes of both Egerton and Anne's father George More, who was Lieutenant of the Tower. Upon discovery, this wedding ruined Donne's career, getting him dismissed and put in Fleet Prison, along with the Church of England priest Samuel Brooke, who married them,[13] and his brother Chistopher, who stood in in the absence of George More to give Anne away. Donne was released shortly thereafter when the marriage was proved to be valid, and he soon secured the release of the other two. Walton tells us that when Donne wrote to his wife to tell her about losing his post, he wrote after his name: John Donne, Anne Donne, Un-done.[14] It was not until 1609 that Donne was reconciled with his father-in-law and received his wife´s dowry,
    ellauri042.html on line 949: After his release, Donne had to accept a retired country life in a small house in Pyrford, Surrey, owned by Anne´s cousin, Sir Francis Wooley, where they resided until the end of 1604. In spring 1605 they moved to another small house in Mitcham, London, where he scraped a meager living as a lawyer, while Anne Donne bore a new baby almost every year. Though he also worked as an assistant pamphleteer to Thomas Morton writing anti-Catholic pamphlets, Donne was in a constant state of financial insecurity.
    ellauri042.html on line 951: Although King James was pleased with Donne's work, he refused to reinstate him at court and instead urged him to take holy orders. At length, Donne acceded to the king's wishes, and in 1615 was ordained priest in the Church of England. In late November and early December 1623 he suffered a nearly fatal illness, thought to be either typhus or a combination of a cold followed by a period of fever. During his convalescence he wrote a series of meditations and prayers on health, pain, and sickness that were published as a book in 1624 under the title of Devotions upon Emergent Occasions. One of these meditations, Meditation XVII, contains the well known phrases "No man is an Iland" (often modernised as "No man is an island") and "...for whom the bell tolls".
    ellauri042.html on line 953: Anne gave birth to twelve children in sixteen years of marriage, (including two stillbirths—their eighth and then, in 1617, their last child); indeed, she spent most of her married life either pregnant or nursing. The ten surviving children were Constance, John, George, Francis, Lucy (named after Donne´s patroness Lucy, Countess of Bedford, her godmother), Bridget, Mary, Nicholas, Margaret, and Elizabeth. Three (Francis, Nicholas, and Mary) died before they were ten. In a state of despair that almost drove him to kill himself, Donne noted that the death of a child would mean one mouth fewer to feed, but he could not afford the burial expenses. During this time, Donne wrote but did not publish Biathanatos, his defense of suicide. Anne died on 15 August 1617, five days after giving birth to their twelfth child, a still-born baby. Donne mourned her deeply, and wrote of his love and loss in his 17th Holy Sonnet.
    ellauri042.html on line 975: The last sestet presents a turn, commonly referred as volta, in the poem. The lyrical voice presents god God as a jealous lover who fears that he/she will be tempted away by someone or something else. The ninth line questions this figure (“But why should I beg more love, whenas thou”). Furthermore, there is a romantic imagery to express how the lyrical voice feels about the figure of God (“whenas thou/Dost woo my soul”). God’s interest in the lyrical voice is referred as a “fear” and as “tender” because of the possibility of the lyrical voice being tempted by the “devil” or by “flesh”.
    ellauri043.html on line 57: Tälle kummallisuudelle vetää vertoja vaan se tositarina, et veli Petteri luki Veikko Huovisen kirjaa Veitikka sivulle 126 ihan naama peruslukemilla, kunnes sanoin sille, että se ei ole historiallista totuutta, vaan paxua läpänheittoa. Sen kuultuaan se sai täys nauruhalvauxen, nauroi kaikki ne naurut jotka siltä oli jäänyt nauramatta niiden ekan runsaan sadan sivun aikana.
    ellauri043.html on line 204: The Mỹ Lai Massacre (/ˌmiːˈlaɪ/; Vietnamese: Thảm sát Mỹ Lai [tʰâːm ʂǎːt mǐˀ lāːj] (About this soundlisten)) was the Vietnam War mass murder of unarmed South Vietnamese civilians by U.S. troops in Sơn Tịnh District, South Vietnam, on 16 March 1968. Between 347 and 504 unarmed people were killed by U.S. Army soldiers from Company C, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment and Company B, 4th Battalion, 3rd Infantry Regiment, 11th Brigade, 23rd (Americal) Infantry Division. Victims included men, women, children, and infants. Some of the women were gang-raped and their bodies mutilated as were children as young as 12.[1][2] Twenty-six soldiers were charged with criminal offenses, but only Lieutenant William Calley Jr., a platoon leader in C Company, was convicted. Found guilty of killing 22 villagers, he was originally given a life sentence, but served only three and a half years under house arrest.
    ellauri043.html on line 296: 1. SIlloin lähetti Merodach BalAdan/ BalAdanin poica/ Babelin Cuningas kirjoituxen/ ja lahjoja Jehiskialle: sillä hän oli cuullut hänen sairastanen/ ja tullen terwexi jällens. 2. Nijn Jehiskia riemuidzi/ ja näytti heille rijstahuonen/ hopian ja cullan/ yrtit/ callit woitet ja caicki hänen caluhuonens/ ja caiken tawaran cuin hänellä oli: ei ollut mitän/ jota ei Jehiskia heille näyttänyt hänen huonesans ja hänen tacanans. 3. SIlloin tuli Propheta Jesaia Cuningas Jehiskian tygö/ ja sanoi hänelle: mitä nämät miehet sanowat/ ja custa he sinun tygös tulewat? Jehiskia sanoi: he tulewat cauca minun tygöni/ nimittäin/ Babelist.
    ellauri043.html on line 297: Babelist. 4. Mutta hän sanoi: mitäst he owat nähnet sinun huonesas? Jehiskia sanoi: caicki mitä minun huonesani on/ owat he nähnet/ ja ei ole mitän minun tawaroisani/ jota ei he ole nähnet. 5. Ja Jesaia sanoi Jehiskialle: cuule HERran Zebaothin sana. 6. Cadzo/ se aica tule/ että caicki mitä sinun huonesas on/ ja mitä sinun Isäs coonnet owat tähän päiwän asti/ pitä wietämän pois Babelijn/ nijn ettei mitän pidä jäämän/ sano HERra.
    ellauri043.html on line 298: 7. Heidän pitä myös päälisexi ottaman sinun lapses jotca sinusta tulewat/ ja sinulle synnytetän/ ja heidän pitä oleman Camaripalwelioina Babelin Cuningan Howisa. 8. Ja Jehiskia sanoi Jesaialle: HERran sana on hywä sen cuins puhut. Ja sanoi: olcon cuitengin rauha ja uscollisus minun päiwinäni.
    ellauri043.html on line 355: krokodiileja kuhisevan virran poikki; keisari Konsta kirjoitti mulle kolme kirjettä;
    ellauri043.html on line 369:

    Varmasti ei ole ketään jolla on näin paljon ressiä! Helläsydämisiä on vähemmän. Mulle ei tuoda enää mitään. Mun palttoo on nyölääntynyt. Mulla ei ole sandaaleja, ei edes puurokuppia! - sillä mä annoin köyhille sukulaisille kaikki rahani, jättämättä oboliakaan. Jotta saisin edes välttämättömiä työkaluja, tarvizisin vähän fyrkkaa. Oi, ei paljoa! Pikku summa vaan! Bussiraha kotia. Osaan pihistellä.
    ellauri043.html on line 432: ja sen epäselvässä suhinassa Anttoni erottaa ÄÄNIÄ, kuin ilma puhuisi. Ne ovat matalia ja vihjaavia, sihiseviä.
    ellauri043.html on line 488:

    Matto tuntuu ihanalta, yhä ihanammalta, niin että se pulskistuu, pöyhistyy, siitä tulee vuode, vuoteesta kumivene; vesi liplattaa sen kylkiin.


    ellauri043.html on line 489:

    Vasemmalla ja oikealla nousee kaksi maankielekettä ja niiden välissä viljelysmaita, sykomoriviikunapuita siellä täällä. Kellojen, tamburiinien ja laulajien ääniä kuuluu kaukaa. Ne on väkeä matkalla Kanopoxeen nukkumaan Serapiin temppelin päällä nähdäxeen unia. Anttoni tietää tän; ja se liukuu tuulen työntämänä kanaalin kahden rannan välissä. Papyruxen lehdet ja lumpeen punaiset kukat, yli miehenkokoiset, kaartuu sen ylize. Se venyy veneen pohjalla; peräairo viistää vettä. Aika ajoin saapuu lämmin tuulahdus, ja hennot kaislat kahisevat. Pienten laineiden liplatus heikkenee. A:n valtaa uneliaisuus. Se näkee unta että se on egyptiläinen munkki.


    ellauri043.html on line 648:

    Siinä meinas mennä jeesuslapsi pesuveden mukana! Areioxen miälestä Kristus, tuo monoteistisen jumalan sivupersoona oli feikki. Se ei ollut samaa ainetta kuin Isä, geenit ei edes 50% samoja. Ei "Isästä iankaikkisuudessa siinnyt", vaan jostain kulkumiehestä, varmaan postiljoonista. Ei siis jumala, vaan vain ihminen niinkuin Spartacus. Jeesus ois siis vaan Jumalan ensimmäinen luomus, ennen Eevan viikuna-asua, matoja ja lintuja. (This is a cinch. Jumala loi miehen ja nai sen.) Iskä on kunnon jumala, jeesus on vaan logo.
    ellauri043.html on line 668:

    Katujen päästä päähän pelkkää kauhistuneen kansan hälinää.
    ellauri043.html on line 733:

    Kuningas pyyhkii hihallaan naamastaan hajuja. Se syö pyhistä astioista ja sitten särkee ne, ja se laskee mielessään laivastojaan, armeijojaan ja kansojaan. Kohtapuoliin se polttaa ihan mielijohteesta palazin juhlijoineen. Se suunnittelee rakentaa uudestaan Baabelin tornin ja syöstä valtaistuimelta jumalan.
    ellauri043.html on line 851:

    Tää hieno kangas, joka rahisee sormissa kuin kipinöisi, on kuuluisaa keltaista pellavaa jota kauppiaat tuo Baktriasta. Ne tarvii 43 tulkkia matkan varrella. Mä teetän siitä pukuja, jotka sä paat päälle kotosalla.
    ellauri043.html on line 1428: Sitä (sielua?) on paljon lihassa, vähemmän kasvixissa. Sitäpaizi puhistuneet ansiokkuuttaan nylkevät vihannexista tän valoisan osan ja se nousee kotiliedelle.
    ellauri043.html on line 1445: Kauhistus!


    ellauri043.html on line 1976: Melchisedek!


    ellauri043.html on line 2151:

    Ensi alkuun ihmetyttää että edessä on pitkä veren värinen ihmispäinen kotelo josta lähtee säteitä, ja sano Knouphis, kirjoitettuna kreikaxi joka puolelle. Se on pylväänpätkän päällä jalustalla. Huoneen muilla seinillä on kiilloitetusta raudasta tehtyjä korkokuvia, eläinten päitä: härän, leijonan, kotkan, koiran ja aasinpää — vieläpä!


    ellauri043.html on line 2155:

    Ne puhuu hiljaisella äänellä perheistään, tai neuvovat toisilleen parannuskeinoja sairauxiin. Monet aikoo nousta laivaan aamunkoitossa, vaino on käynyt liian kovaxi. Mutta pakanoita ei ole vaikea huijata. «Ne luulee hölmöt että me palvotaan Knouphista!»


    ellauri043.html on line 2225: myrisee ahdistuxesta; on kuin jokin hirviömäinen tunne leijuisi sen ympärillä, jonkun pian tapahtuvan rikoxen aiheuttama kauhistus.


    ellauri043.html on line 2547:

    Mulle nytte ei enää ole toivoa eikä ahistusta, ei onnea, ei äijyyttä, ei päivää eikä yötä, ei sua eikä mua, siis kerrassan ei midiä.


    ellauri043.html on line 3783: Kun mä asuin Heliopolixen temppelissä, kazelin usein kaikkea mitä oli seinillä: korppikotkia kantamassa valtikoita, krokoja rämpyttämässä lyyraa, kuvia käärmemiehistä, lehmänpäisistä naisista rähmällään jättikyrpäisten jumalien edessä, ja niiden yliluonnolliset hahmot veti mut muihin maailmoihin. Ois ollut kiva tietää mitä niiden levolliset silmät näkivät.
    ellauri043.html on line 3830:

    Niistä tulee kauhistuttavia: korkeita töyhtöjä, silmiä, pullistuneita silmiä, käsiä jotka päättyy koukkukynsiin, hain hammaskaluja.
    ellauri043.html on line 3839:

    Kauhistus!
    ellauri043.html on line 3918:

    Isä, poika ja pyhiskään ole kuin yxi henkilö!
    ellauri043.html on line 4215: kaaoxen eka tietoisuus, sukelsin kuilusta kovettamaan matskua, säätelemään formuja; ja mä opetin humaaneille kalastusta, pirttiviljelystä, kaunokirjotusta ja kirkkohissaa.
    ellauri043.html on line 4265: Niitä on 30 pääasiallista. 15 nöysee maasta ylös, 15 kazoo alas. Säännöllisin välein 1 kiitää yläilmoista alas ja toinen jättää alahiset noustaxeen ylös.
    ellauri043.html on line 4493: Aasi on pyhästynyt (tai pidätetty). Otetaan huppu pois. Sen alla on toinen kirjekuori (tai kääre) mustasta huovasta. Sit 1 (naismaisesti laittautuneista, suom. huom.) miehistä alkaa vielä tanssia, pelehtien kalkkarokäärmeillä; toinen kontillaan lootan edessä lyö bongorumpuja; ja
    ellauri043.html on line 4626: Soihturivi estää näkemästä sen pärstäkerrointa; ja Antun valtaa ahistus. Se pelkää tunnistavansa ruumiissa yhen tutun.
    ellauri043.html on line 5122: Sillä aikaa Kairoxet ojentavat kyntensä pitääxeen kiinni sieluista; furiat repivät epätoivoissaan käärmeensä tukasta; ja Kerberos, jonka sä panit kytkyeeseen, rähisee, louskuttaen kolmesta kurkustaan.
    ellauri043.html on line 5319: Jo useemman kerran sun puhuessa musta näytti et sä kasvat; eikä se ollut harhakuva. Miten nyt näin? Selittäkääpäs… Sun persoonä kauhistuttaa mua!
    ellauri043.html on line 5912: Siis mitä? Maailmanhistoria on peli, jossa jumalalla on voittostrategia. Ei se muuta mieltään kesken peliä eikä koskan ylläty apinan siirrosta, koska peli on sille täydellisen informaation peli. Se on kazonut kaikkien kortit. Vähän sellistä Arskan draamaattista ironiaa.
    ellauri043.html on line 5933: Mua pelottaa! mä putoon hissikuiluun!
    ellauri043.html on line 6413:

    Älä vastustele; teidän on seurattava minua! Saatat olla impotentti, mut mä oon omnipotentti! Mezät kaikuu mun huokauxista, ulapat vellovat mun liikehdinnästä. Äijyys, rohkeus, pyhistely haihtuvat mun suun parfyymiin. Mä seuraan sua miekkonen, jokaiselle portaalle jonka sä väsäät, — ja haudan kynnyxeltä sä palaat mun buduaariin!
    ellauri043.html on line 6426:

    Mun syöveri on syvempi! Marmorilaatatkin on inspiroineet rivoja temppuja. Syöxytään kauhistaviin tapaamisiin. Sidotaan uudestaan kettinkejä joita kirotaan. Mistä tulee kurtisaanien loisto ja kurjuus, unien tuhlaavaisuus, panon jälkeinen suru?
    ellauri043.html on line 6496:

    Kumpikaan näistä kahesta ei mua kauhista. Mä torjun onnen, ja tunnen izeni ikuisexi.
    ellauri043.html on line 6793:

    Meitä poltetaan, meitä hukutetaan, meitä murskataan; ja aina me vaan ilmestytään uudestaan, entistä eloisampina ja lukuisampina, — lukumääräisesti kauhistuttavina!
    ellauri043.html on line 6969: Leopardi Phalmant repii mahansa kun se huutaa niin kovasti; Senad, kolmipäinen karhu, joka repelee pentunsa kielellään; Cepus-koira levittää kiville nisiensä sinisen maidon. Itikat alkaa inistä, konnat hyppiä, käärmeet sihistä. Salamat välähtelee. Sataa vettä, sataa lunta, sataa pieniä rakeita.
    ellauri045.html on line 328: Saroyan has been described by Stephen Fry (mixihän?) as "one of the most underrated writers of the century." Fry suggests that "he takes his place naturally alongside Hemingway, Steinbeck and Faulkner."
    ellauri045.html on line 366: Minun tuli venakkohuoraa ikävä, tai ketä tahansa, sanoo Hannu tarkoittaen että panettaa. Pissaliisaa se ahistelee täysin välittämättä sen pyynnöistä. Kaskun sille tuli ikävä. Leffassa se kazoi miten rakkaus alkoi, toteutui ja loppui. Toteutuminen oli se puikotus. Tyypillistä Hannua. Onnexi se sai sentään mafialta turpaan.
    ellauri045.html on line 526: Ville Ropposen Suuren idän essee on villisti kieppuva nojatuolimatka ajassa ja tilassa halki entisen Neuvostoliiton. Liikkeessä Tallinnasta Almatyyn ja Siperiasta Kaukasiaan Ropponen ruotii kirjallisuutta ja aatehistoriaa, elokuvaa ja nykyhetken ideologioita. Kirjassa selviävät suomalaisten suhde itänaapuriin, Aral-järven kohtalo, se kuka on Kazakstanin isoin ihminen ja tuhannet muut asiat. Teosta lukemalla selviävät myös nyky-Venäjän aatekiemurat. Nonfiktio-teoksen kokeellinen rakenne heijastelee suuren ja mahtavan monihaaraisuutta. Ropponen sekoittaa teoksessa faktaa ja fiktiota, tunnustuksellisuutta ja houreita, kirjallisuusanalyysia, matkakertomusta ja haastattelua. Reportaasi yhtyy runouteen ja dialogi faktapohjaiseen epiikkaan. Ropposen nonfiktioteoksen jälkeen suomalainen esseistiikka ei enää ole ennallaan.
    ellauri045.html on line 644: Хрипит он, смотря мне в лицо, se kähisee lättyyn kazoen,
    ellauri045.html on line 726: Saarella asuneet ihmiset rakensivat kammion Temppelin alle, jossa savuhirviö oleskeli. Kammiossa olevista hieroglypheistä päätellen he uskoivat hirviön olleen saaren vartija. Kun Black Rock -laiva saapuu saarelle vuonna 1867, savuhirviö tappaa laivan miehistön lukuun ottamatta Richardia. Mies yrittää huijata Richardin tappamaan Jacobin, mutta Jacob vakuuttaa Richardin liittymään neuvonantajakseen.
    ellauri045.html on line 763: Lillrank aloittaa esittelemällä McCloskeyn kuvauksen porvaristosta, sen historiasta, rakenteesta ja luonteesta. Porvaristoa tarkastellaan hyveisiin perustuvan teorian pohjalta. Porvariston päähyveeksi teoria nimeää harkitsevuuden, johon liittyy oma etu mutta myös muita hyveitä kuten usko, toivo ja rohkeus. Näistä koostuu taito olla hyvä liikemies. Porvariston hyveiden merkitys McCloskeyn teorialle on keskeinen, sillä sen mukaan niiden yhdistyminen valistuksen ihanteisiin loi pohjan kapitalismin synnylle.
    ellauri045.html on line 786: Her book Crossing was a New York Times Notable Book in 1999. Her latest books, The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (2006) and Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World (2011), are parts of a four-volume "apology" for capitalism, of which she says: "I reckon this is why God put me on the planet. She thought, '"Hmm. We need an economist who is silly enough to try to unify the scientific and the humanistic sides. Oh, yeah: Deirdre.'"
    ellauri046.html on line 31: Kovaxikeitetyt miehet polttaa aina tupakkaa. Se onkin aika rohkeaa ajatellen nyt vaikka koronariskiä. Mutta ne jotka on röökin koukussa mieluummin vaikka kuolee kun lopettaa. Venäläisistä miehistä 60% prosenttia vetää tupakkaa, 20% naisista. Venakot ei ole yhtä kovaxikeitettyjä, vaikka varmasti pahemmassa liemessä.
    ellauri046.html on line 43: Filosofiset mietelmänsä Fredrikin oli tapana kirjoittaa muistiin joko runomittaan tai suorasanaisina. "Lukeminen merkizee ajattelemista!" hänen oli tapana huomauttaa. Hän otti myös tavaxeen merkitä jotakin kirjaa lukiessaan muistiin mietelmänsä. Kirjoittaminen oli hänelle yxinkertaisesti suorastaan elämän tarve. "Milloin en lue enkä kirjoita, tunnen oloni samanlaisexi kuin nuuskaaja, jolta on otettu nuuskarasia pois ja joka on kuolla kärsimättömyyttään niin että vähän väliä pistää kätensä taskuunsa", hänen oli tapana laskea leikkiä. (Ragnar Svanström: Kansojen historia, jatko-osa I.)
    ellauri046.html on line 47: On säälittävä epähistoriallinen pukudraama alaikäsille millenniaaleille, Game of Thrones siikveli. Ällöjä 2000-luvun juippeja pukukohtauxissa ällöillä 2000-luvun elkeillä. Ihan epäaitoja puhekuplia ja sentimenttejä. Historiaa on muutettu niin että juoneen mahtuu kaikkia rotuja ja pystypanoa. Naiset on miesmäisempiä kuin miehet. Epsanjan kuningatar lähtee noin puolijoukkueen etunenässä käsikähmään hepan selässä Sierra Madren vuorilla kuin joku el Zorron Dona Carita. Muovisia digitoituja Westminstereitä. Halvan näköisiä kulisseja. Kummallista persu-mamu-brexitpelleilyä ylhäisaatelisten kesken. Pah koko Euroopan kuninkaalliset oli oikeesti kaikki vanhoja tuttuja ja lähisukulaisia. Neekereitä b-pääosissa ja mumslimeita et riittää jokaiselle jotakin. Oikeasti pikkupoika Harrystä oli tehty ello isoveljeä röyhkeämpi juippi joka leikkii miehekkäästi pyssyillä.
    ellauri046.html on line 53: No tykkään Anna-sarjasta, joka monissa suhteissa on yhtä epähistoriallinen ja oikeasti puhuu tämän päivän kanadalaisista teineistä. Kännykät on vaan piilossa hameen taskussa. Mitä eroa? Ehkä se että sen hahmot on tai edes yrittää olla vähän kiltimpiä. Vallanhimo pysyy neanderthal mittakaavassa. Sitäpaizi Annassa on huumoria, se ei ole totaalisen ryppyozainen ja huumoriton kuten Katariina Aragon. Punatukkaisia ovat molemmat. On neandertaaligeenejä.
    ellauri046.html on line 118: I don't need anyone this time
    ellauri046.html on line 137: I won't need anyone this time
    ellauri046.html on line 146:

    Talous- ja kirjallisuushistoriaa


    ellauri046.html on line 192: He was a "very stern man, to all appearances dry and prosaic, but under his 'rustic cloak' demeanor he concealed an active imagination which not even his great age could blunt". He was also interested in philosophy and often hosted intellectuals at his home.The young Kierkegaard read the philosophy of Christian Wolff. He also preferred the comedies of Ludvig Holberg, the writings of Johann Georg Hamann, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, Edward Young, and Plato.
    ellauri046.html on line 194: Nuori Söören oli pieni ja pellen näköinen, tukka töröllä et näyttäs pitemmältä. Kuin Tolstoin Lexan a la coq. Haarukka, pisteliäs kuten isänsä. Isä sai raivarin kun Söören kaatoi suolakon. Olletikkin kihlauskin meni perseixi isän takia. Sörkalla ei ollut vielä papin papereita kunnossa. Iskä ei halunnut historian toistuvan.
    ellauri046.html on line 266: Kierkegaard is known for many things. . . . He is not, however, generally known for his humor. Who might reasonably be nominated as the funniest philosopher of all time? With this anthology, Thomas Oden provisionally declares Søren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)--despite his enduring stereotype as the melancholy, despairing Dane--as, among philosophers, the most amusing.
    ellauri046.html on line 268: Kierkegaard's humor ranges from the droll to the rollicking; from farce to intricate, subtle analysis; from nimble stories to amusing aphorisms. In these pages you are invited to meet the wife of an author who burned her husband's manuscript and a businessman who, even with an abundance of calling cards, forgot his own name. You will hear of an interminable vacillator whom archeologists found still pacing thousands of years later, trying to come to a decision. Then there is the emperor who became a barkeeper in order to stay in the know.
    ellauri046.html on line 272: Not only does this book make Kierkegaard accessible but it also entertains, regales with story, and amuses. It will be useful for the lectern, pulpit, and after-dinner dais. The selections, which made me laugh, illustrate sardonically the contradictions of existence."—David J. Gouwens, Brite Divinity School, Texas Christian University.
    ellauri046.html on line 347: Kierkegaard was born in 1813 to a prosperous family in Copenhagen. He seems to have suffered some sort of trauma early on, associated with his breaking-off an engagement to his beloved Regine Olsen (he never married), or perhaps because of his sternly religious father, or the fact that his mother, and all but one of his six siblings, died young.
    ellauri046.html on line 349: He studied philosophy and theology at university and then spent the rest of his life in his home town doing not much other than producing volume after volume of works which are some sort of mixture between philosophy, theology, and literary criticism.
    ellauri046.html on line 359: This abridgement reduces the original quarter of a million words down to about 12,000 (around 5%), based on three different translations, one by Alastair Hannay, another by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong, and a third by an unnamed translator, possibly Lee M. Hollander. As with many of these condensed versions, having picked out the glowing passages may give an impression of a coherence which is absent in the rambling, repetitive and frequently incomprehensible original. The staccato style, though, is what it is like.
    ellauri046.html on line 365: "Personality is only ripe when a man has made the truth his own. "
    ellauri046.html on line 433: This brief study argues that Kierkegaard's Journals show beyond reasonable doubt that he was homosexual. It does so because he believed that the recognition of this fact was central to the understanding of his life and thought, because he could not bring himself to say this openly even in the privacy of his own Journals, because he hoped and prayed that his "reader" would discover and reveal it after his death, because even distinguished scholars privy to his "secret" have remained silent and because, given these facts, it is surely time to open up this question.
    ellauri046.html on line 435: This very preliminary study has eight parts. The first assembles a number of entries from his Journals showing that he was homosexual and seen as such by at least some of his contemporaries. The second looks again at his relation with Regine and examines some of his own accounts of his relations with other men. The third provides other evidence of his homosexuality, particularly from his youth. The fourth briefly outlines his conceptions of and relations to Socrates, Christ and God. The fifth attempts to trace the history of his understanding of the relation of Christianity and homosexuality. The sixth repeats some of his own accounts of the homosexual origin and character of the central notions of his existentialism. The seventh presents homosexuality as his hope and agenda for future. Finally, the eighth attempts to summarize and make sense of the preceding.
    ellauri046.html on line 456: According to Church tradition, Veronica was moved with sympathy seeing Jesus carrying the cross to Calvary and gave him her veil so that he could wipe his forehead. Jesus accepted the offer, and when he returned the veil the image of his face was miraculously captured on it. The resulting relic became known as the Veil of Veronica.
    ellauri046.html on line 462: The Greek astronomer Ptolemy considered Coma Berenices to be an asterism in the constellation Leo, representing the tuft at the end of the lion’s tail, and it was not until the 16th century that Berenice’s Hair was promoted to a constellation in its own right, on a celestial globe by the cartographer Caspar Vopel. It is the Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe who is usually credited for the promotion. He included Coma Berenices among the constellations in his star catalogue of 1602.
    ellauri046.html on line 526: Individ. Personlighed. Aethiker-Gymnastik. Det er overall en Danseplads for et Maenniske. Selv den ringeste Maenniske har sin. Det er denne Faegter-Dygdighed, denne Smidighed, der egentlig er er det udoedlige Liv i det Ethiske.
    ellauri046.html on line 527: Saaledes frygte mange Mennisker urimelig Doeden. For Andet vill det Ethiske egentligen ikke. Man maa blive sig selv gjennemsigtig. Det er ikke Meningen ad nyde Livet, utan opfylde sine Pligter.
    ellauri046.html on line 529: Söörenillä on väärä etymologia Pligtille. Ei se ole Paalaegg vaan frankkilaista alkuperää, samaa kuin pledge, siis pantti. Etkö sinä muiista mitää sinää lupaasit? Mitäpä muuta tämä on kuin Dan Steinbockin sisäistetty herruus. Mut juutalaiset kuten Dan on sydämettömiä lakimiehiä. Eivät osaa rakastaa jumalaa eikä yhyä paljon izeään kuten kristityt. Aethiske Maenniske on det almene menniske, musketöörimäisesti yxi kaikkien ja kaikki yhden puolesta.
    ellauri046.html on line 531: Tää on talousliberaalin termitismin uskontunnustus. Den som lever ethisk har sig selv dom Opgave. Kylläpä on izekeskeistä. Tavoitteena on olla ainut ihminen. Siinä mielessä kuin jokainen termiitti on vaan yx perintöaines kaikille yhteinen. Se on hienoa. Sit on stridt den gode Strid. Forsyn eli kaizelmus hoitelee hommat kotio.
    ellauri046.html on line 539: Miten Kierkegaard jonka sai ideat lattapäältä Scribeltä on saanut niin paljon seuraajia? Hämäryyttään kai. Siinä on jotain joka vetoaa uskonnollisuuteen taipuvaisiin narshisteihin. Uskontohemmot rakastaa nilkkiyttä, siis vapautta ja vastuuta, enemmän kuin luppoaikoja. Pligt og Ansvar.
    ellauri046.html on line 737: Loppusaarna koskee teodikeaa. Se et jotkut historian kommelluxet olis jumalan rangaistusta tai edes kenenkään suunnitelmissa on toivottoman pöhkö ajatus. Alkeellista apinamorfiaa. Sillä se ei pääse puusta pitkään.
    ellauri046.html on line 790: If Apollo should e’er his assistance refuse,
    ellauri046.html on line 808: Oh! cease to affirm that man, since his birth,
    ellauri046.html on line 941: In his heart the lad rejoices:
    ellauri047.html on line 60: Thuringenistä Frankfurtiin muuttanut räätäli-isoiskä kirjotti vielä nimensä ööllä Göthe, ennenkun alkoi suurkaupungissa hienoilla. Scneiderscheren schneiden scarf, scharf scneiden Schneiderscheren. Se nai izellen eskisaarismaisesti kukoistavan hotellialan yrityxen ja rikastu sillä niin törkeesti et jätti jälkeensä läjittäin kiinteistöjä, pantteja ja kultasäkkejä. Goethen isä Johann Kaspar Goethe (1710–1782) oli lakitieteen tohtori, joka kuului Frankfurtin varakkaimpiin porvareihin, ei tarvinnut päivääkään työtä tehdä. Se oli saita pedantti. Goethen äiti oli iloluontoinen Katharina Textari (1731–1808). Äiskä "Frau Rat", rouva rotta, oli 17 kun se naitettiin yli 2x vanhempaan ökyporvariin. Muut lapset kuoli paizi Woku ja sisko Cornelia, jonka kanssa se leikki nukketeatteria ja lääkärileikkejä. Äitikin sano sitä Hätschelhansixi. Goethe ei käynyt lapsena koulua, vaan hän sai kotiopetusta laajasti sivistyneeltä isältään ja kotiopettajilta. Hänelle opetettiin muun muassa historiaa, matematiikkaa, maantiedettä, miekkailua, tanssia ja piirtämistä. Ranskan kielen hän oppi niin perusteellisesti, että hän kykeni puhumaan sitä yhtä hyvin kuin äidinkieltään.
    ellauri047.html on line 76: Samoihin aikoihin hän alkoi saada mainetta kirjailijana. Vuonna 1774 ilmestyi kirjeromaani Nuoren Wertherin kärsimykset, josta tuli nopeasti suurmenestys joka puolella Eurooppaa. Romaanin päähenkilö Werther ajautuu onnettoman rakkauden vuoksi itsemurhaan, ja tämä tarina teki lukijoihin niin vahvan vaikutuksen, että nuorison keskuuteen levisi suoranainen itsemurhaepidemia. Tätä Goethen romaania on pidetty hyvin leimallisena teoksena saksankielisen kirjallisuudenhistorian vuosina 1767–1785 vallinneelle Sturm und Drang -kaudelle. Eli Goethe apinoi siinä Klopstockia. Riku lainas meille kirjaa, jossa oli Klopstockin vaimon kirjeitä. Tuntui silloin tylsältä. Nyt voiskin jo kiinnostaa.
    ellauri047.html on line 84: Ein Genie (über das französische génie vom lateinischen genius, ursprüngl. „erzeugende Kraft“, vgl. griechisch γίγνομαι „werden, entstehen“, dann auch „persönlicher Schutzgott“, später „Anlage, Begabung“) ist eine Person mit überragender schöpferischer Geisteskraft („ein genialer Wissenschaftler“, „ein genialer Künstler“).
    ellauri047.html on line 85: Genialität kann sich auf allen Gebieten zeigen – künstlerisch, wissenschaftlich, wirtschaftlich, philosophisch, politisch usw. Es kann zwischen Universalgenies, Genies und „verkannten Genies“ unterschieden werden.
    ellauri047.html on line 105: Goetheista Christiane oli se jolla oli housut jalassa. Kun Napsun sotilaat tuli Goetheille rähisemään, Woku ihan "kivettyi", ja se oli Christiane joka heitti retkut pihalle. Kiitoxexi Woku "sinetöi" 18-vuotisen leipäsusisuhteensa ja nai seuraavalla viikolla Christianen kirkossa 1806. Niille syntyi paljon lapsia, joista vaan esikoinen August eli aikuisex, tosin tavixex. Sillä ei ole edes enkunkielistä Wikipedia-sivua. Saxalaiselta sivulta käy ilmi millasta oli olla neron varjossa. Aku alko dokata. Sillä välin Roopella oli sen 7 eri hania samaan aikaan kun Christiane piti kotia. Se kirjoitti: "Pidän kovasti pojista, mutta tytöt on vielä kivempia. Jos kyllästyn tyttöön tyttönä, se voi toimia mulle myös poikana." Elämä on etupäässä kivaa, mutta menettelee se takapäässäkin. Schillerin kuolemasta toipuaxeen 58v vanha sika vikitteli jo 1807 18-vuotiasta Minna Herzlieb orpoa, joka esiintyy Goethen viimeisessä romskussa Vaaliheimolaiset Ottilian nimellä.
    ellauri047.html on line 117: Goethen koko tuotanto on koottu 143-osaiseen Weimarin laitokseen. Osalla Goethen teoksista on enää historiallista merkitystä, mutta hänen keskeiset runonsa ovat säilyttäneet tuoreutensa. Siltä on säästynyt 10K kirjettä ja 3K taulua toritaidetta. Erityisesti se tykkäs teatterista, sitä se oli leikkinyt kotona pienenä. Sope diggas Wilhelm Meisteriä. Ralph Waldo Emerson valizi Goethen yhdexi 6 "mallimiehestä" (muut olivat Plato, Emanuel Swedenborg, Montaigne, Napoleon, and Shakespeare). Aika erikoinen sixpäkki miehen malleja. Mut Rafu oli aika erikoinen izekin.
    ellauri047.html on line 139: Wolfgang oli äidin lellipoika, Hätschelhans. Huonosti kirjoittava iloinen Aja-äiti tykkäs enitenHansin haukotuttavasta Hermannista ja Dorotheasta, kanto sitä mukanaan kuin kissa pentujaan. Aja oli zinzendorfilainen, eli siis herrnhutilainen. Herrnhutilaisista oli puhe kirkkohissassa, joka oli mun mielestä koulun turhin aine, eräänlainen opin Kouvola tai Piexänmäki. Seijalle se oli ihan mieliaine.
    ellauri047.html on line 153: Nuori Goethe Leipzigissä oli vähän tollanen izetyytyväinen Hanswurst, rokokoo-harlekiiniasussa tepasteli takakenossa puumiekka vyötäisillä, Pluto olet oikea pelle! Wider Hans Worst kirjoitti jo Martin Luther, ja lisää hongankolistaja, oikeinkirjoituxen professori Gottsched. Vernünftige Tadlerinnen. Mefisto on peräisin Hansun vanhemmasta kaverista kotiopettaja Behrischistä, laiha kuiva piru, jolla oli huomattavan suuri nenäkin.
    ellauri047.html on line 620: jättihartioilla; suhisten
    ellauri047.html on line 726: Muttei kauhistu tyttö mun edessä, eikä matroona,
    ellauri047.html on line 787: Sittois vielä tää Herder, jonka muistan lähinnä Hans Arensiin kielitieteen historiasta. Se liittyi siellä jotenkin Humboldtiin, josta Jörgin ruozalainen vaimo piti jatko-opiskelijoille lukupiiriä. Siitä saattaa mulla jo runo ollakkin.
    ellauri047.html on line 867: Fredrik Suuri eli Fredrik II (saks. Friedrich II der Große; 24. tammikuuta 1712 Berliini, Preussi – 17. elokuuta 1786 Potsdam, Preussi) oli Hohenzollern-sukuun kuulunut Preussin kuningas, joka hallitsi vuosina 1740–1786. Hänet tunnetaan taistelukentillä menestyneenä soturikuninkaana ja valistuneena itsevaltiaana, joka nosti Preussin yhdeksi Euroopan mahtivaltioista. Hänen aikanaan Preussiin liitettiin muun muassa Sleesia sekä itäinen Länsi-Preussi. Hän puolusti Preussia seitsenvuotisen sodan aikana muun muassa Venäjää, Itävaltaa, Ranskaa, Saksia ja Ruotsia vastaan varsin varsin menestyksellisesti liittolaisenaan ainoastaan Britannia. Puolan jaossa 1772 hän sai lopulta yhdistettyä Preussin historialliset alueet valtansa alle. Sotilaallisten saavutustensa lisäksi hänet muistetaan myös Preussin oikeusjärjestelmän uudistajana, elinkeinoelämän edistäjänä ja ranskalaisen sivistyksen suosijana. Hän oli myös pisimpään Preussia hallinnut kuningas. 46 vuotta.
    ellauri047.html on line 922: Rauha kirjoitti siellä runoja, esseitä ja tutkielmia kaikessa rauhassa yxinomaan omaxi ratoxeen. Parhaisiin tuloxiin se pääsi historiallisissa töissä kuten "Oman aikani historia", ja vittuilevissa epigrammeissa Voltairen, Dideroon ja Lessingin oppipoikana. Izensä suhteen se oli lahjomattoman rehellinen eli haukkui izeään melkein yhtä kipeästi kuin muita. Täst mie piän! Mun mieleiseni mies. "Olen harrastelija kaikessa", se kerran huokasi. Huokasikohan Goethe, tai Puovo Huovikko. Puovon poika Heikki on nyt 2020 tosi pullea. Coronan riskiryhmäläisiä, kuten karjatilallinen miehekkäämpi astmaattinen vaimonsa.
    ellauri047.html on line 940:

    Kouluhistoriaa


    ellauri047.html on line 942: Mun lähde hallizijajuoruihin on lääk.tri Pauli Pylkkäseltä peritty Kansojen historia. Tämä 12-osainen Världshistoria on alansa kaikkien aikojen suurimpia myyntimenestyksiä. Sen ensimmäinen osa ilmestyi vuonna 1926. Teossarjaa on myyty ainakin 500 000 kappaletta, Suomessakin yli 100 000. Se on hieno nahkaselkäinen kirjarivistö, joka näyttää vaikuttavalta lähetyssaarnaaja Wilho Pylkkäseltä perityssä kirjahyllyssä.
    ellauri047.html on line 944: Carl Grimberg (22. syyskuuta 1875 – 11. kesäkuuta 1941) oli ruotsalainen historioitsija, koulutukseltaan filosofian tohtori. Grimberg kirjoitti noin kymmenosaisen maailmanhistorian, jonka toiset viimeistelivät. Grimberg ehti ize kirjoittaa 6 ekaa osaa, 4 muuta Ragnar Svanströmin kaa. Oppipoika Ragnar matki Carlia niin hyvin että haamukirjoitti omin nokin vielä jatko-osia.
    ellauri047.html on line 946: Grimberg, koulun historianlehtori, vuoli kultaa kirjoittamalla historiaa niin, että sitä on tyhmemmänkin hauska lukea. Se opetti myös äidinkieltä (ruozia), latinaa, historiaa ja maantiedettä Lundsbergin sisäoppilaitoxessa ja sittemmin Uppsalassa ja lopulta Tukholman pohjoisessa Ressussa. Se oli hirmu suosittu opettaja, pikkutytöt kirjoitti sille ylistysvärssyjä.
    ellauri047.html on line 956: Rahantuloa ei voinut estää, kukaan historioizija Ruozissa (paizi Fryxell) ei pystynyt tienaamaan yhtä hurjasti. Carl rakensi omista otrajauhoista Drjursholmin rantapromenaadille Villa Sjövikin mahonkisine kirjahyllyineen, täynnä Carlin kirjasarjoja.
    ellauri047.html on line 1006: Kennedy used the phrase twice in his speech, including at the end, pronouncing the sentence with his Boston accent and reading from his note "ish bin ein Bearleaner", which he had written out using English orthography to approximate the German pronunciation. He also used classical Latin pronunciation of civis romanus sum, with the c pronounced [k] and the v as [w].
    ellauri047.html on line 1008: There is a widespread misconception (outside German-speaking countries) that the phrase was not used correctly and actually means "I am a doughnut", referring to the Berliner doughnut. It has even been embellished into an urban legend, including equally incorrect claims about the audience laughing at this phrase.
    ellauri048.html on line 40: So ergreifet ohne Säumnis Ilman saumaa yhistyvät
    ellauri048.html on line 41: Heilig öffentlich Geheimnis. julkeat ja pyhistyvät.
    ellauri048.html on line 541: Parallels have been drawn between the "Lord of the Flies" and actual incident from 1965 when a group of 6 schoolboys who sailed a fishing boat from Tonga were hit by a storm and marooned on the uninhabited island of ʻAöö-ta, considered dead by their relatives in Nuku‘alofa. The group not only managed to survive for over 15 months but "had set up a small commune with food garden, hollowed-out tree trunks to store rainwater, a gymnasium with curious weights, a badminton court, chicken pens and a permanent fire, all from handiwork, an old knife blade and much determination". Dutch historian Rutger Bregman, writing about this situation said that Golding's portrayal was unrealistic. There has been no WW III yet, and kids killing other kids is entirely unheard of. Except a bunch of school killings in America and Finland, among other places.
    ellauri048.html on line 694: miten norjalaisten talot hiljaa valuu kohisevaan mereen.

    ellauri048.html on line 712: Yx Gloria feministi kirjassa A Room of his Own osoittaa et Sale oli narsistinen misogyyni konservatiivi setämies. Gloria luettelee alaviitteessä yheltä Sedgwickiltä löytämiään homopiirteitä, joista monet istuu Saleen kuin sademiehen nenä naamaan:
    ellauri048.html on line 720: sexual deviations from the heterosexual norm such as homosexuality, sadomasochism, fetishism and homophobia

  • ellauri048.html on line 738: Bellow's characterisation of his father's background is one of the most enjoyable strands of the book and an interesting companion to Saul's fiction. His father, Abraham, is characterised by his grandson as a crook and a tyrant, who despised his youngest son's literary ambitions and pummelled him – and all his sons – until Saul grabbed his hand mid-air one day and said, "I'm a married man, Pa. You cannot hit me anymore." In adulthood, on the rare occasions Bellow tried to talk to his father about his upbringing, Saul would shake him off and say rather pointedly: "You shouldn't blame your parents for your faults." Bellow smiles. "And he said this to me, a therapist no less! His father loved him, but it was a tumultuous relationship and my grandfather was mercurial as hell."
    ellauri048.html on line 740: Bellow makes a distinction between "young Saul", the Marxist and rebel, and "old Saul", the famous author and increasing reactionary. Young Saul was his son's ally and encourager; old Saul was "buried under pessimism, anger, bitterness, intolerance and preoccupations with evil and with his death".
    ellauri048.html on line 741: Anita worked and, while Saul tried to write, supported the family financially, something his father conveniently overlooked, Bellow says, after they split up and she had to chase him for alimony. "I was 20 before he became famous, so I did not grow up the son of a famous father. I grew up the son of a starving artist."
    ellauri048.html on line 743: There followed the years of bohemia, when the family moved to Paris and Saul started to shrug off the influence of his 19th-century literary heroes and find his own voice in The Adventures of Augie March. When he was happy and the writing was going well, their lives would be joyous; when he struggled, the apartment was mired in gloom. Meanwhile, "Saul had women stashed all over town," writes his son. The pain of these recollections is secondary to Bellow's fury at what he calls his father's "self‑justification: that his career as an artist entitled him to let people down with impunity." As an adult, when he asked his mother about it, she said, "I'm blessed with a poor memory."
    ellauri048.html on line 745: The taboo of spilling the beans on Saul was "very big", he says, ""ecause my father took the position that art is inviolate and that the artist has to be protected at all costs because he's an artist. Towards the end of his life, Saul asked his son rather charmingly, "Was I a man or a jerk?", which Bellow quotes in the book. "You know, he was asking himself a dead earnest question. And I think it was the right question. But if you were lionising him, you don't ask that question."
    ellauri048.html on line 747: Like what? "There were a lot of very unhappy people at various points of his life, who felt maligned. Ex-wives high up there. Wives number two and three, Adam's mother and Daniel's took a whipping. My mother got off easy. I think he knew he did her wrong. At some point he said to me: 'I should never have divorced your mother.' I replied: 'Pop, how then could you have written Herzog?' And he said, 'I could have done it.'
    ellauri048.html on line 757: Hessu oli kova kauppaamaan omia kirjojaan. Niitä osti Queen Victoria, Alfred Lord Tennyson, Prime Minister William Gladstone, Walt Whitman ja Oscar Wilde. At the time of his death, he was one of the most successful writers in America, with an estate worth an estimated $356,000. Olipa amerikkalainen loppukaneetti. Silti Hessu ei ollut tarpeexi amerikkahenkinen: but he failed to capture the American spirit like his great contemporary Walt Whitman, and his work generally lacked emotional depth and imaginative power. Se oli liian pro-Eurooppa. Löysä riimittelijä, tiivistivät myöhempien sukupolvien kriitikot ilkeästi. Orjuuden vastustajanakin Långben oli vähän puoliveteinen. Ameriikan Immi Hellen.
    ellauri048.html on line 766: And the muscles of his brawny arms kazoppa niitä, kuin nippu kyrpiä
    ellauri048.html on line 777: You can hear his bellows blow; kuuluu sieltä jyske moukarin,
    ellauri048.html on line 778: You can hear him swing his heavy sledge, puhina seppämestarin ja ison palkeen,
    ellauri048.html on line 791: And sits among his boys; luo silmäyxiä pikku Pirkkoon;
    ellauri048.html on line 793: He hears his daughter's voice, kazoo kukonpoikia ja kanoja;
    ellauri048.html on line 795: And it makes his heart rejoice. nakkisormilla venyttelee kaulusta.
    ellauri048.html on line 801: And with his hard, rough hand he wipes Ei sitä kanzi katua ja nyyhkiä,
    ellauri048.html on line 802: A tear out of his eyes. märkää nyrkkiä sepaluxeen pyyhkiä.
    ellauri048.html on line 820:

    Tämän runon ja muita pitkän häiskän runoja käänsi espanjaksi kolombialainen poeetta Rafael Pombo. Useissa haastatteluissa baseballinpelaaja ja manageri Billy Southworth on maininnut että sen isä luki tätä runoa sille niin usein pienenä, niin että Billy oppi sen ulkoa, ja se on usein inspiroinut sitä aikuisena. Useita lainauxia runosta esiintyy väliruuduissa Buster Keatonin 1922 mykkäelokuvassa The Blacksmith (1922). Vuonna 1938 Tommie Connor, Jimmy Kennedy, and Hamilton Kennedy tekivät siitä koomisen laulu-ja tanssinumeron, jota Glenn Miller lauloi 1990 filmissä Memphis Belle. Repe Sorsa siteeraa siitä pätkän 1953 piirretyssä Duck Amuck. Notta ei se ihan hukkiin mennyt.
    ellauri048.html on line 842: A whisper, and then a silence: Kuiskutusta ja sipinää:
    ellauri048.html on line 860: In his Mouse-Tower on the Rhine! ei tästä pääse enää naimatta.
    ellauri048.html on line 926: Goethe plucks the flower although it tells him not to do so. He takes it to his house and plants it in his garden. He wants to tell us, viewers or readers, look how noble I am, he because he takes it home. He doesn't realize that by taking the flower home he is taking her wild life away and domisticating it in his factory (garden). In that he is not different from industrialists and people who practise green house raising. It is like enslaving his flower and on top of that he wants to be applauded and praised because he doesn't kill it. However, he does't listen to what his flower says: do not pluck me or I will die.
    ellauri048.html on line 947: This poem is cool... well awsomness! I like it a lot and what is a Crannied wall??
    ellauri048.html on line 950: This poem gives me the chills. This is the essens of all religions in the world.
    ellauri048.html on line 1070: See All Poems by this Author
    ellauri048.html on line 1072: "Break, Break, Break" is a poem by Alfred, Lord Tennyson written during early 1835 and published in 1842. The poem is an elegy that describes Tennyson's feelings of loss after Arthur Henry Hallam died and his feelings of isolation while at Mablethorpe, Lincolnshire. Were Tennyson and Hallam Gay, and Did They Have a Physically Consummated Homosexual Relationship?
    ellauri048.html on line 1074: Garrett Jones claims that Alfred Tennyson and Arthur Henry Hallam, whose death was the occasion for writing In Memoriam, were in some sense homosexual lovers, and that Hallam was a promiscuous homosexual whose father sent him to Cambridge, separating him from his Eton friends as a way of curtailing his son's inclinations (a curious, rather naive strategy, one might think!). For most of the book, he gives the impression that the two friends had an intense homosexual relationship that must have included physical acts. However, on p. 192 out of 199, he announces the following:
    ellauri048.html on line 1078: Given that no one has ever doubted that Tennyson had some sort of "disembodied, spiritualized passion" for Hallam, this conclusion comes as rather a painful anticlimax. Admittedly, Alf named his son Hallam after Hallam, the one who went to Australia. Of course, the fact that members of Tennyson´s family succumbed to madness, alcoholism, and drug addiction already has made some readers aware that, like so many other Victorians, he should be taken down from a pedestal and join the rest of us. But think of the stir if one the greatest poems of the nineteenth century, one which has major influence on poets as different as Whitman and Eliot, turned out to be chiefly a gay lover's lament! (What's wrong with that? There are zillions of others, better yet.) Tän apologian kirjoitti on George P. Landow, Professor of English and the History of Art, (fittingly) from Brown University.
    ellauri048.html on line 1087: That he shouts with his sister at play! Joka huhuilee leikkisiskoa!
    ellauri048.html on line 1089: That he sings in his boat on the bay! Joka laskee laulaen veneen kylkeen!
    ellauri048.html on line 1106: Arthur Henry Hallam (1 February 1811 – 15 September 1833) was an English poet, best known as the subject of a major work, In Memoriam, by his close friend and fellow poet Alfred Tennyson. Hallam has been described as the jeune homme fatal (French for "doomed young man") of his generation.
    ellauri048.html on line 1110: Hallam and Tennyson became friends in April 1829. They both entered the Chancellor's Prize Poem Competition (which Tennyson won). Both joined the Cambridge Apostles (a "private debating society"), which met every Saturday night during term to discuss, over coffee and sardines on toast (“whales”), serious questions of religion, literature and society. (Hallam read a paper on 'whether the poems of Shelley have an immoral tendency'; Tennyson was to speak on 'Ghosts', but was, according to his son's Memoir, 'too shy to deliver it' - only the Preface to the essay survives). Meetings of the Apostles were not always so intimidating: Desmond MacCarthy gave an account of Hallam and Tennyson at one meeting lying on the ground together in order to laugh less painfully, when James Spedding imitated the sun going behind a cloud and coming out again. Capital, capital.
    ellauri048.html on line 1114: Hallam spent the 1830 Easter holidays with Tennyson in Somersby and declared his love for Emilia. Hallam and Tennyson planned to publish a book of poems together: Hallam told Mrs Tennyson that he saw this "as a sort of seal of our friendship". Hallam's father, however, objected, and Hallam's Poems was privately published and printed in 1830. In the summer holidays, Tennyson and Hallam travelled to the Pyrenees (on a secret mission to take money and instructions written in invisible ink to General Torrijos who was planning a revolution against the tyranny of King Ferdinand VII of Spain). In December, Hallam again visited Somersby and became engaged to Emilia. His father forbade him to visit Somersby until he came of age at twenty-one.
    ellauri048.html on line 1116: In July 1833, Hallam visited Emilia. On 3 August, he left with his father for Europe. On 13 September, they went to Vienna, with Hallam complaining of fever and chill. It was apparently a recurrence of the "ague" he had suffered earlier that year, and, although it would delay their departure to Prague, there seemed to be little cause for alarm. Quinine and a few days rest were prescribed. By Sunday 15th, Hallam felt sufficiently better to take a short walk with his father in the evening. When he returned to the hotel he ordered some sack and lay down on the sofa, talking cheerfully all the time. Leaving his son reading in front of the fire, his father went out for a further stroll. He returned to find Hallam still on the sofa, apparently asleep apart from the position of his head. All efforts to rouse him were in vain. Arthur Hallam was dead at the age of twenty-two.
    ellauri048.html on line 1129: This stanza is to be found in Canto 27. The last two lines are usually taken as offering a meditation on the dissolution of a romantic relationship. However, the lines originally referred to the death of the poet's beloved friend. They are reminiscent of a line from William Congreve's popular 1700 play, The Way of the World: "'tis better to be left than never to have been loved." What the fuck, this is an obvious homoerotic elegy.
    ellauri048.html on line 1235: What whispers from thy lying lip? Mitä kuiskit sun valeläpästä?
    ellauri048.html on line 1237: 'The stars,' she whispers, `blindly run; 'Tähdet', se kuiskaa 'valuu sokeasti;
    ellauri048.html on line 1308: Drops in his vast and wandering grave. putoaa sen valtavaan vaeltavaan kuoppaan.
    ellauri048.html on line 1315: Expecting still his advent home; Kun mä vielä odotin sitä kotiintulevaxi;
    ellauri048.html on line 1316: And ever met him on his way Ja mielessäni tapailin sitä useinkin,
    ellauri048.html on line 1327: And thinking `this will please him best,' Ja ajatellen 'tästähän se tykkää eniten',
    ellauri048.html on line 1338: Or kill'd in falling from his horse. Tai kuollut pudotessaan hepan selästä.
    ellauri048.html on line 1384: And this poor flower of poesy surkea runon kukkanen, joka hylättynä
    ellauri048.html on line 1388: I go to plant it on his tomb, Mä aion istuttaa sen sen haudalle,
    ellauri048.html on line 1401: Thro´ prosperous floods his holy urn. Kuljettakoon pyhän tuhkalaatikon.
    ellauri048.html on line 1424: Thou bring'st the sailor to his wife, Sä tuot määrimiehen takas puolisolle,
    ellauri048.html on line 1430: This look of quiet flatters thus Tää hiljaisuus vaan saa uskomaan
    ellauri048.html on line 1450: Calm and deep peace on this high world, Tyyni ja syvä rauha täällä korkeella
    ellauri048.html on line 1460: Calm and deep peace in this wide air, Tyyni ja syvä rauha tässä ilmanalassa,
    ellauri048.html on line 1477: I leave this mortal ark behind, Mä jätän tän kuolleen arkin taaxeni,
    ellauri048.html on line 1487: Is this the end of all my care?' Onx tää loppuvihellys mun huolille?
    ellauri048.html on line 1489: 'Is this the end? Is this the end?' Onx tää loppu? Loppuko tää on?
    ellauri048.html on line 1499: And moves his doubtful arms, and feels Ja liikuttaa epäluuloisia käsiä, ja tuntee
    ellauri048.html on line 1523: If one should bring me this report, Jos joku tois mulle tämän raportin,
    ellauri048.html on line 1544: No hint of death in all his frame, Ei mitään tuonen merkkiä sen varressa,
    ellauri048.html on line 1603: Was as the whisper of an air
    ellauri048.html on line 1629: And from his ashes may be made
    ellauri048.html on line 1630: The violet of his native land.
    ellauri048.html on line 1635: And in the places of his youth.
    ellauri048.html on line 1642: Ah yet, ev'n yet, if this might be,
    ellauri048.html on line 1643: I, falling on his faithful heart,
    ellauri048.html on line 1644: Would breathing thro' his lips impart
    ellauri048.html on line 1682: Another service such as this.'
    ellauri048.html on line 1707: `This fellow would make weakness weak,
    ellauri048.html on line 1712: That with his piping he may gain
    ellauri048.html on line 1715: A third is wroth: `Is this an hour
    ellauri048.html on line 1752: And spread his mantle dark and cold,
    ellauri048.html on line 1799: This earth had been the Paradise
    ellauri048.html on line 1806: That sets the past in this relief?
    ellauri048.html on line 1814: I know that this was Life,—the track
    ellauri048.html on line 1819: But this it was that made me move
    ellauri048.html on line 1871: This poem is in the public domain. Presented here are the prologue and cantos I - XXVII.
    ellauri048.html on line 1888: “Not once did the Polish Army deploy cavalry against German tanks,” the embassy statement said. “This is pure Nazi and Communist propaganda that continues to weave its way into Western media reports to this very day.”
    ellauri048.html on line 1892: But Nazi propagandists spun this battle and other encounters with Polish cavalry — horse was a big component of the Polish army — as vindication of the Wehrmacht’s technical modernity and tactical superiority.
    ellauri048.html on line 1893: Poles hate the myth because it cheapens what they actually did in the war. As war historian Ben Macintyre wrote: “The Polish contribution to Allied victory in the Second World War was extraordinary, perhaps even decisive, but for many years it was disgracefully played down, obscured by the politics of the Cold War.”
    ellauri048.html on line 1897: “If the mainstream media is to be respected by viewers, it cannot recycle old Nazi propaganda,” the Polish embassy statement reads. “We ask that Mr. Cramer apologize for his insensitive comparison and that viewers of Mad Money be made aware of the historical inaccuracy of the statement in question,” the statement concludes.
    ellauri049.html on line 60: Sana sonetti tulee italian sanasta sonetto, joka tarkoittaa pientä laulua. 1200-lukuun mennessä sana oli vakiintunut merkitsemään nelitoistarivistä, tarkkaa rakennetta noudattavaa runomittaa. Sonetin rakenne on kuitenkin muuttunut sen historian aikana. Shakespearelainen sonetti muunsi petrarcalaista rakennetta seuraavaan asuun: ABAB CDCD EFEF GG. Näiden teerikukkojen lisäxi sonettia soitti setämies Baudelaire, Rimbaud ja Mallarme.
    ellauri049.html on line 95: To-morrow sharpened in his former might: mi täyden mahan saa taas kurnivaxi.
    ellauri049.html on line 100: Let this sad interim like the ocean be Tää panotauko vertautukoon luoteeseen,
    ellauri049.html on line 110: Mulla tahtoo mennä Kaarlo Sarkia ja Uuno Kailas sekaisin. Mut ei ihme, niin meni niilläkin. Käärmeet solmussa, erittäin kiihtyneinä kuin New Yorkissa hiljan postilaatikosta löytynyt 2,5 metrinen pyytton, pää koholla ja sihisten. Goethen mato oli vaan puolen jalan mittainen.
    ellauri049.html on line 116: Vierahissa kuljet sa kaiken matkaa
    ellauri049.html on line 191: Uuno Salonen kirjautui Helsingin yliopiston historiallis - kielitieteelliseen tiedekunnanosastoon syksyllä 1920. Siirtyessään Helsinkiin Uuno jätti taakseen kuvataiteen tekemisen. Uuno oli epävarma akateemisen alan valinnasta, sillä oma runoilijan kutsumus oli Honkapään sukulaisten ajatuksien vastainen. Yliopistovuosiensa 1920-23 ja 1925-26 aikana hän ei suorittanut yhtään opintokokonaisuutta. Kouluttautuminen oli vain lume, niin hänelle itselleen kuin honkapääläisille, jolla hän mahdollisti elämänsä pääkaupungissa. Aika kului runojen kirjoittamiseen, sanomalehti- ja kustannusalan kirjallisiin toimitustehtäviin, käännöstöihin ja dekadenttiin boheemieloon.34 Kailas osallistui aktiivisesti nuorten kirjailijoiden, Nuoren Voiman Liiton jäsenten ja tulevien Tulenkantajien seurapiirielämään. Hengenheimolaisuus edesauttoi niin runoilijan uraa mutta myös rappioelämää.
    ellauri049.html on line 361: What are some reasons not to move to Belgium? The Belgians themselves are the most important reason. They are selfish, arrogant, noisy, rude, full of hate, machismo and gynephobia, fundamentalistically religious, uncivilized, vulgar, ugly, mostly drunk and intoxicated with coke and xtc, very dangerous car drivers, cannibals and neanderthalers. (by: Charles Baudelaire)
    ellauri049.html on line 369: Kärpässarjalainen elämäkerturi Henry Troyat suhtautuu Belgian-kirjoituxiin vaivautuneesti: miten Pahan kukkien runoilijanero saattoi sortua kirjoittamaan alatyylisiä solvauxia, jotka eivät juuri ylitä vessakirjoituxien tasoa? Mä tiedän miten: se ei enää karsinut sen paasauxia. Kirjallisuushistoria stilisoi tekijän, eikä vaan se, vaan tekijä ize tekee samaa. "Tää ei kuulosta Goethelta", ajattelee Hansu, ja pyyhkii alatyylisellä rykäyxellä pyllyä. Paizi sitten ihan vanhana.
    ellauri049.html on line 657: Réfléchissons... Erwäg... Nyt pohditaan...
    ellauri049.html on line 786:

    Modernismin historia (tiiviste)


    ellauri049.html on line 904: Un peuple vague aux racines des arbres puunjuurten epätarkkarajainen puuhiskansa
    ellauri049.html on line 1021: Rotuja on kuin koronan runtelemassa New Yorkissa, jossa ruumiit mätänee jätekonteissa. Taas ihmisen eli valkoihosen näköset on parhaita ja punaiset keltaiset mustat humanoidit kakkoskastia, karvaisen eläimen näköiset kotieläimiä, ropotit orjia ja lemmikkejä, matelijan, sammakon tai hyönteisen näköiset kerrassaan pahixia. Mustia kuolee eniten koronaan, keisari MAGA ei pidä siitä. Vetelyxet. Koneet ja ropotit korvaa lapset ja sylikoirat. Koneet hurisee, laitteet hyrisee, aseet välähtelee, sankarit painaa urheasti ja taitavasti nappulaa kuin värivammanen Michael Jackson hississä. Suomalainen Chewbacca ei saa basic-kielen sanaa suustan, mölähtelee vaan turkisläjä.
    ellauri049.html on line 1042: Pekka Tarkka ilmaisi lievän pettymyksen siitä, että kahden edeltävän tutkijan, Matti Klingen ja Johan Wreden, välisestä ottelusta tulee tarkastelussani nahkapäätös, tasapeli. Nybergin sitaatissa Wreden käsi nousee oikeutetusti. Hän ymmärtää enemmän runoutta, Klinge laajemmin historiaa ja politiikkaa. Molempien kirjat innoittivat omaa työtäni suuresti.
    ellauri049.html on line 1060: Olisi luonnollisesti epäasiallista ja täysin aiheetontakin pohtia kysymystä, oliko Emilie Björkstén tämän suuren ja syvän, miehisen ritarillisen rakkauden arvoinen. Oli hänessä runsaasti sitä naisellisuuden ja nuoruuden irrationaalista viehätystä, joka täysin määrin riittää selittämään Runebergin kiintymyxen. Hänen omat runokokokeilunsa, vaikka ne ovatkin ilman varsinaista esteettistä arvoa, eivät millään tavoin puhu häntä vastaan ihmisenä ja naisena, joskin ne ehkä osoittavat, että luonto hänessä oli tullut liiankin tietoisexi izestään. Niinpä hän on ize hieman narkissosmaisesti tarkastellut omaa kuvaansa kirjoittaessan "Den nyckfulla"-runonsa säkeet. On kuitenkin muistettava, ettei Runeberg ymmärrettävistä syistä voinut antaa tunteilleen yhtä välitöntä julkista ilmaisua kuin Emilie. Mix vitussa? Hemmetin setämiehet, ihan samanlaisia kuin jamaikalaisen sokeriplantaasin orjanomistajaäijät, välillä bylsitään nättejä orjatyttöjä, välillä annetaan ruoskan soida. Koskenniemestäkin näkyy selvästi, että kristus on vaan globalisaation emoji kristillisyyden kyljessä, pääasia on länsimainen luottoluokitus.
    ellauri050.html on line 167: No ei sentään. On liikuttaviakin yxityiskohtia: 11-vuotiaana Ransu lähetettii katoliseen seminaariin lähellä Durhamia. Se oli hento herkkä hirmu ujo poika, kaverit sanoi sitä hulluxi. Sen näki jo kaukaa käytävässä hiipimässä lammasmaisesti takinkaulus ylhäällä. Näitä piisas Norssissa, mun luokalla oli useampia. Hyppytunneilla se hipsi koulun kirjastoon ja luki historiaa ja runoja. Vaikka kirjastossa oli kaamee mekkala ja käytiin rizasotia, Ransu sulki izensä pois ja keskittyi kirjoihin kuin Sateenkaarinotkon pastori Meredith. Siitä tuli ihan hikipinko ainekirjoituxessa. Kerran se sai jälkkäriä oltuaan hitain jumppatunnilla. Kazokaa Lallia, kolme, neljä. Huono matikassa, mutta aika hyvä käsipallossa. Kriketissä ykkösluokan penkkiurheilija. Koulu pyysi siltä juhlarunon 1908 kuin kuningatar Kristiinalta Suomen Akatemia, mutta ehti kuolla ensin, 1907. Kristiinalla on tässäkin käynyt parempi pulla.
    ellauri050.html on line 206: From this tremendous Lover— piiloon tolta karseelta rakastajalta-
    ellauri050.html on line 213: Clung to the whistling mane of every wind. tartuin joka viheltävään tuuliharjaan.
    ellauri050.html on line 217: They clanged his chariot ’thwart a heaven, ne kolaroi sen sotavaunuun taivaalla,
    ellauri050.html on line 327: His name I know, and what his trumpet saith. Mä tiedän sen nimen, ja mitä torvi sanoo.
    ellauri050.html on line 406: Paramahansa Yogananda (born Mukunda Lal Ghosh; January 5, 1893 – March 7, 1952) was an Indian monk, yogi and guru who lived his last 32 years in America. He introduced millions to the teachings of meditation and Kriya Yoga through his organization Self-Realization Fellowship (SRF) / Yogoda Satsanga Society (YSS) of India. A chief disciple of the Bengali yoga guru Swami Sri Yukteswar Giri, he was sent by his lineage to spread the teachings of yoga to the West, to prove the unity between Eastern and Western religions and to preach a balance between Western material growth and Indian spirituality. His long-standing influence in the American yoga movement, and especially the yoga culture of Los Angeles, led him to be considered by yoga experts as the "Father of Yoga in the West." Jooga on lännessä suosittu naisten jumppamuoto, kun siinä ei hypitä niin että tissit hölskyy. Venytellään vaan kissamaisesti lattialla, ei tarvi hikoilla eikä välttämättä käydä jumpan päälle edes suihkussa, jos on kiire.
    ellauri050.html on line 408: Yogananda was the first major Indian teacher to settle in America, and the first prominent Indian to be hosted in the White House (by President Calvin Coolidge in 1927); his early acclaim led to him being dubbed "the 20th century's first superstar guru," by the Los Angeles Times. Arriving in Boston in 1920, he embarked on a successful transcontinental speaking tour before settling in Los Angeles in 1925. For the next two and a half decades, he gained local fame as well as expanded his influence worldwide: he created a monastic order and trained disciples, went on teaching-tours, bought properties for his organization in various California locales, and initiated thousands into Kriya Yoga. By 1952, SRF had over 100 centers in both India and the US; today, they have groups in nearly every major American city. His "plain living and high thinking" principles attracted people from all backgrounds among his followers.
    Valtaosa amerikkalaisista pitää enemmän high living and plain thinking - vaihtoehdosta.
    ellauri050.html on line 410: He published his book Autobiography of a Yogi in 1946 to critical and commercial acclaim; since its first publishing, it has sold over four million copies, with HarperSan Francisco listing it as one of the "100 best spiritual books of the 20th Century". Former Apple CEO Steve Jobs had ordered 500 copies of the book for his own memorial, for each guest to be given a copy. The book has been regularly reprinted and is known as "the book that changed the lives of millions." A 2014 documentary, Awake: The Life of Yogananda, won multiple awards at film festivals around the world.
    Tästä viimeistään käy ilmi, että tää tuuba on täysin hanurista, todella syvältä. Mut hyvin vetää hindu ton taivaskoira-räpin.
    ellauri050.html on line 494: Rilke oli isänsä tahdosta vuosina 1886–1891 sotilasakatemiassa. Vuosina 1895–96 hän opiskeli kirjallisuutta, taidetta, historiaa ja filosofiaa Prahassa ja Münchenissä. Rilke tutustui vuonna 1897 Lou Andreas-Saloméhen, jonka kanssa hänelle muodostui läheinen suhde. Keväällä 1901 Rilke nai kuvanveistäjä Clara Westhoffin, jonka hän oli tavannut edellisenä syksyn Worpswedessää. Parille syntyi joulukuussa 1901 tytär Ruth. Kesällä 1902 Rilke lähti Pariisiin. Siellä julkaistiin vuonna 1910 hänen ainoa romaaninsa Malte Laurids Briggen muistiinpanot. Pariisin-vuosinaan hän julkaisi myös useita runoja. Ille faciet-vanhemmat on saaneet aikaan hurjasti runoilijoita.
    ellauri050.html on line 641: Vietin suven viimeisiä päiviä Itämereen pistäville rantakallioille rakennetussa kesäkodissani, jonka ylize useimpien muuttolintujen siivet jo olivat suhisseet. Melkoinen suhina, kun kaikki halus välttämättä lentää just siitä. Kai ne oli kuulleet musta. Keskustelin mökkinaapurini, vanhan hampaattoman reuhkapään kalastajan kanssa lintujen muuttoajoista, josta äijällä oli omat omituiset käsityxensä. Kehtas väittää vastaan kansallisrunoilijalle ja professorismiehelle. Jouzenet muka pysähtyivät meidän lahdelle ja polkee siinä vettä kunnes jalat jäätyy kiinni. Olisin maxanut paljon, ehkä jopa satalappusen vanhaa rahaa nähdäxeni sen omin silmin, mutta ukkopa ei huolinut. (Ei ollut silloin satasen setelissä jouzentenkuvia, satanen oli punainen ja siinä oli havunoxia.)
    ellauri050.html on line 1042: Wenn die Räder rasselten, Kun pyörät rahisi,
    ellauri050.html on line 1043: Rad an Rad rasch ums Ziel weg, vaunuissa rähisi jäbät,
    ellauri050.html on line 1060: In dem Fragment Über die neuere Deutsche Literatur hatte Herder notiert: „Dithyramben, nach dem griechischen Geschmack nachgeahmt, bleiben für uns fremde. Das trunkne Sinnliche, was bei ihnen entzückte, wäre vielleicht für unsre feine und artige Welt ein Aergerniß; das Rasende in ihnen wäre uns allerdings dunkel, verworren und oft unsinnig.
    ellauri051.html on line 267: Iltalehden tuore historianumero 2013 vahvistaa, miten vaihtelevasti omaan menneisyyteen suhtaudutaan. Taiteilijat innostuvat usein ääriliikkeistä - eivätkä pysty myöhemminkään itsekritiikkiin. Kaisa Korhonen ei kadu mitään, Sinikka Sokka vähättelee sitoutumistaan, Kaj Chydenius pitää kiinni aatteistaan. Niin Kari Rydmankin nazipojanpoikineen, mutta se ei kuulu tähän.
    ellauri051.html on line 297: Kuka sit on tai oli rehabilitoitu Marko Auer? Saxalainen potkupalloilija? Vaiko freelance consultant? Sekin opiskeli historiaa, mutta väärää, ei päässyt rehtorixi peräseinäjoelle. Tuli vaan izekriitikko takki nurinpäin. No pääsi silläkin sentään vielä kerran lehteen.
    ellauri051.html on line 301: Luin äskettäin jostakin, että Herlinin Sanomien ex-kriitikko Kasa Veronen arvosti kun ex-vasemmistolainen Anssi Sinnemäki näki Koskenniemessä muutakin kuin vanhan nazin. Anssi Sinnemäen juhlakirja Trifonovin jotakin avaa kirjallisuushistorian suljettuja ovia. Sinnemäki on pitkän linjan kriitikko ja vanhan koulukunnan vasemmistolainen toimittaja, tunnettu muun muassa Kulttuurivihkojen päätoimittajana ja oman pienkustantamon, Tamara Pressin pyörittäjänä. Tästä Sinnemäestä on ollut jo useitakin havaintoja, sehän on se nimekäs vasemmiston takinkääntäjä. Repostelijaa repostelee vuorostaan Markku Soikkeli, josta mulla ei ole mitään havaintoa ennen alla lainattavaa Kiiltomadon prujausta.
    ellauri051.html on line 328: Spekulatiivinen fiktio on kuvitteellisia maailmoja ja tapahtumia kuvaavaa kirjallisuutta. Termi on kattokäsite, joka käsittää alalajit tieteiskirjallisuus, fantasiakirjallisuus ja kauhukirjallisuus. Näiden piiristä voidaan erottaa lisäksi utopiakirjallisuus, steampunk, vaihtoehtoinen historia ja maaginen realismi. Termin käyttö yleistyi 2000-luvulla. Osa kirjailijoista on käyttänyt termiä erottamaan teoksiaan viihteellisestä tai lajityyppisidonnaisesta fantasiasta ja scifistä.
    ellauri051.html on line 340: Epäilenpä että tämä Soikkeli on poliittisesti oikealla laidalla. Se siteeraa suopeasti Pauli Pylkköä, joka puhuu rumia kulttuurivasemmistosta. Pauli Pylkkö taitaa olla ränsistyneen Jaakkoh-Hintikan viimeisiä lahkeessaroikkujia, josta tuli tämän jälkeen nähtävästi jonkinlainen postmoderni nazi ja Heidegger-fani. Vittuili pitkästi ja rumasti myös fyysikkoviikarille Kari Enqvistille ("huomaa Enqvistin kiinnostus ulosteisiin."). Pylkkö on kyllä niin surkuteltava filosofi, että jopa Hintikkakin pyörinee myötähäpeästä kuopassansa Korsossa. Ei kai vaan Pylkkö ole uskonnollinenkin? Hui kauhistus. Mysteereitä persiissä. Dodi. Tää voi kyllä vähän kirpaista. Tää Anti-Enqvist (2012) on aivan tolkuttoman pitkä. On pakko loikkia kuin Soikkeli lukiessaan Saarikosken juoppopäiväkirjoja.
    ellauri051.html on line 358: The tendency in savages to imagine that natural objects and agencies are animated by spiritual or living essences, is perhaps illustrated by a little fact which I once noticed: my dog, a full grown and very sensible animal, was lying on the lawn during a hot and still day; but at a little distance a slight breeze occasionally moved an open parasol, which would have been wholly disregarded by the dog, had any one stood near it. As it was, every time that the parasol slightly moved, the dog growled fiercely and barked. He must, I think, have reasoned to himself in a rapid and unconscious manner, that movement without any apparent cause indicated the presence of some strange living agent, and no stranger had a right to be on his territory. (Darwin)
    ellauri051.html on line 482: Van Buren syntyi izenäisessä USA:ssa, puhui hollantia kotona, perusti demokraattipuolueen, pääsi pressaxi muttei jatkokaudelle. He has been generally ranked as an average or below-average U.S. president by historians and political scientists (enimmäxeen repupersuja).
    ellauri051.html on line 505: The world woke up this Friday to another pleasant surprise from, shall we say it again, the breezy Nobel laureate: a Whatman-esque tune aptly-titled “I Contain Multitudes.”
    Mitä helvettiä, toi onkin Whatmanin omakehusta, vaikka luin sen poikasena Callen Waldenista på svenska: "Motsäger jag mig? Gott, jag motsäger mig. Jag är stor, jag rymmer mångfalder."
    ellauri051.html on line 545: 6 My tongue, every atom of my blood, form'd from this soil, this air, 6 Mun kieli, mun veriatomit, tästä maasta, tästä valuutasta,
    ellauri051.html on line 562: 22 Echoes, ripples, buzz'd whispers, love-root, silk-thread, crotch and vine, kaikuja, kareita, kuiskutuxia, lempijuuri, silkkilanka, munahaukka,
    ellauri051.html on line 576: 33 Stop this day and night with me and you shall possess the origin of all poems, Vietäppä tää päivä ja yö mun kaa niin ne kaikki selviää,
    ellauri051.html on line 596: 51 I and this mystery here we stand. on tää mysteeri ja mä sen mukana.
    ellauri051.html on line 676: 116 This grass is very dark to be from the white heads of old mothers, Tää ruohon on liian tummaa tullaxeen vanhojen äitien valkoisista päistä,
    ellauri051.html on line 681: 121 I wish I could translate the hints about the dead young men and women, Kunpa voisin kääntää vihjeet kuolliesta nuorista miehistä ja naisista,
    ellauri051.html on line 708: 145 Undrape! you are not guilty to me, nor stale nor discarded, Nakuxi! et ole mulle syyllinen, et nahistunut etkä roska,
    ellauri051.html on line 719: 155 The heavy omnibus, the driver with his interrogating thumb, the clank of the shod Raskas bussi, kuski kysyvine peukaloineen, kengitettyjen
    ellauri051.html on line 725: 160 The excited crowd, the policeman with his star quickly working his passage Väki innostuu: tappelu! seriffi tähtineen kiirehtää
    ellauri051.html on line 757: 186 Her father and his friends sat near cross-legged and dumbly smoking, they had 186 Hänen isänsä ja hänen ystävänsä istuivat lähellä jalat ristissä ja tupaten tupakoimassa, heillä oli
    ellauri051.html on line 759: 187 On a bank lounged the trapper, he was drest mostly in skins, his luxuriant beard and 187 Pankissa ansastaja oli pukeutunut enimmäkseen nahoihin, hänen rehevä parta ja kiharat suojasivat
    ellauri051.html on line 760: curls protected his neck, he held his bride by the hand, hänen kaulaansa, hän piti morsiameaan kädestä,
    ellauri051.html on line 765: 190 I heard his motions crackling the twigs of the woodpile, 190 Kuulin hänen liikkeensä rätisevän puukasan oksia,
    ellauri051.html on line 768: 193 And brought water and fill'd a tub for his sweated body and bruis'd feet, 193 Ja toi vettä ja täytti ammeen hänen hikoilevalle ruumiilleen ja mustelmille jaloilleen,
    ellauri051.html on line 770: 195 And remember perfectly well his revolving eyes and his awkwardness, 195 Ja muista täysin hänen pyörivät silmänsä ja kömpelyytensä,
    ellauri051.html on line 771: 196 And remember putting plasters on the galls of his neck and ankles; 196 Ja muistakaa laittaa laastarit hänen niskansa ja nilkkojensa sappeihin;
    ellauri051.html on line 780: 204 Which of the young men does she like the best? 204 Mistä nuorista miehistä hän pitää eniten?
    ellauri051.html on line 795: 217 The butcher-boy puts off his killing-clothes, or sharpens his knife at the stall 217 Teurastajapoika riisuu tappava vaatteensa tai teroittaa veitsensä torilla,
    ellauri051.html on line 797: 218 I loiter enjoying his repartee and his shuffle and break-down. 218 Olen viihtynyt nauttien hänen esittelystään ja hänen sekoitusstaan ​​ja murtumisestaan.
    ellauri051.html on line 799: 220 Each has his main-sledge, they are all out, there is a great heat in the fire. 220 Jokaisella on pääkelkkansa, he ovat kaikki ulkona, tulessa on suuri kuumuus.
    ellauri051.html on line 803: 224 They do not hasten, each man hits in his place. 224 He eivät kiirehdi, jokainen lyö paikallaan.
    ellauri051.html on line 805: 225 The negro holds firmly the reins of his four horses, the block swags underneath on its tied-over chain, 225 Neekeri pitää tiukasti kiinni neljän hevosensa ohjaksista, lohko leijuu alla sidotun ketjunsa päällä,
    ellauri051.html on line 807: 227 His blue shirt exposes his ample neck and breast and loosens over his hip-band, 227 Hänen sininen paitansa paljastaa hänen laajan kaulan ja rintansa ja löystyy hänen lantionauhansa yli,
    ellauri051.html on line 808: 228 His glance is calm and commanding, he tosses the slouch of his hat away from his forehead, 228 Hänen katseensa on tyyni ja käskevä, hän heittää hattunsa pois otsaltaan,
    ellauri051.html on line 809: 229 The sun falls on his crispy hair and mustache, falls on the black of his polish'd and perfect limbs. 229 Aurinko laskee hänen raikkaille hiuksilleen ja viiksilleen, putoaa hänen kiillotettujen ja täydellisten raajojensa mustille.
    ellauri051.html on line 814: 234 Absorbing all to myself and for this song. 234 Imeän kaiken itselleni ja tälle laululle.
    ellauri051.html on line 826: 245 The wild gander leads his flock through the cool night, 245 Villi uura johdattaa laumaansa viileän yön läpi,
    ellauri051.html on line 837: 256 Of men that live among cattle or taste of the ocean or woods, 256 Miehistä, jotka elävät karjassa tai maistavat merta tai metsiä,
    ellauri051.html on line 847: 265 The carpenter dresses his plank, the tongue of his foreplane whistles its wild ascending lisp, 265 Puuseppä pukee lankkunsa, hänen etulentokoneen kieli viheltää villi nousevaa huuliaan,
    ellauri051.html on line 856: 274 (He will never sleep any more as he did in the cot in his mother's bed-room;) 274 (Hän ei koskaan nuku enää niin kuin hän nukkui vauvansängyssä äitinsä makuuhuoneessa;)
    ellauri051.html on line 857: 275 The jour printer with gray head and gaunt jaws works at his case, 275 Jour Printer harmaapää ja laihaat leuat työskentelevät hänen tapauksessaan,
    ellauri051.html on line 858: 276 He turns his quid of tobacco while his eyes blurr with the manuscript; 276. Hän kääntää tupakkapussinsa samalla kun hänen silmänsä hämärtyvät käsikirjoituksesta;
    ellauri051.html on line 862: 280 The machinist rolls up his sleeves, the policeman travels his beat, the gate-keeper marks who pass, 280 Konemies käärii hihat, poliisi kulkee lyöntinsä, portinvartija merkitsee ohikulkevat,
    ellauri051.html on line 864: 282 The half-breed straps on his light boots to compete in the race, 282 Puoliverinen hihnat hänen kevyissä saappaissaan kilpaillakseen kilpailussa,
    ellauri051.html on line 866: 284 Out from the crowd steps the marksman, takes his position, levels his piece; 284 Ampuja astuu ulos joukosta, ottaa asemansa, tasoittaa nappulansa;
    ellauri051.html on line 868: 286 As the woolly-pates hoe in the sugar-field, the overseer views them from his saddle, 286 Kun villapasteet kuokkavat sokeripellolla, valvoja katsoo niitä satulasta,
    ellauri051.html on line 878: 296 The paving-man leans on his two-handed rammer, the reporter's lead flies swiftly over the note-book, the sign-painter is lettering with blue and gold,296 Päällystysmies nojaa kaksikätiseen junttaajaansa, toimittajan johto lentää nopeasti muistivihkon yli, kylttimaalari kirjottaa sinisellä ja kullalla,
    ellauri051.html on line 879: 297 The canal boy trots on the tow-path, the book-keeper counts at his desk, the shoemaker waxes his thread, 297 Kanavapoika ravia hinauspolulla, kirjanpitäjä laskee pöytänsä ääressä, suutari vahaa lankaansa,
    ellauri051.html on line 881: 299 The child is baptized, the convert is making his first professions, 299 Lapsi kastetaan, käännynnäinen tekee ensimmäisiä ammattiaan,
    ellauri051.html on line 883: 301 The drover watching his drove sings out to them that would stray, 301 Kuljettaja, joka katselee autoaan, laulaa niille, jotka eksyvät,
    ellauri051.html on line 884: 302 The pedler sweats with his pack on his back, (the purchaser higgling about the odd cent;) 302 Kauppias hikoilee reppu selässään (ostaja hykertelee paritonta senttiä;)
    ellauri051.html on line 892: 310 The crew of the fish-smack pack repeated layers of halibut in the hold, 310 Fish-smack-pakkauksen miehistö toisti kerroksia pallasta ruumassa,
    ellauri051.html on line 893: 311 The Missourian crosses the plains toting his wares and his cattle, 311 Missourilainen ylittää tasangot kantaen tavaransa ja karjansa,
    ellauri051.html on line 896: 314 In single file each shouldering his hod pass onward the laborers; 314 Yhdessä tiedostossa kukin olkapäänsä kantava kulkee työmiehiä eteenpäin;
    ellauri051.html on line 900: 318 The stumps stand thick round the clearing, the squatter strikes deep with his axe, 318 Kannot seisovat paksuna aukion ympärillä, squatter iskee kirveellä syvään,
    ellauri051.html on line 908: 326 The old husband sleeps by his wife and the young husband sleeps by his wife; 326 Vanha mies nukkuu vaimonsa vieressä ja nuori mies vaimonsa vieressä;
    ellauri051.html on line 943: 359 This is the grass that grows wherever the land is and the water is, 359 Tämä on ruoho, joka kasvaa kaikkialla, missä on maata ja vettä,
    ellauri051.html on line 944: 360 This the common air that bathes the globe. 360 Tämä yhteinen ilma kylpee maapalloa.
    ellauri051.html on line 958: 372 This is the meal equally set, this the meat for natural hunger, 372 Tämä on yhtä lailla asetettu ateria, tämä liha luonnolliselle nälälle,
    ellauri051.html on line 964: 378 This is the press of a bashful hand, this the float and odor of hair, 378 Tämä on röyhkeän käden puristus, tämä kelluke ja hiusten tuoksu,
    ellauri051.html on line 965: 379 This the touch of my lips to yours, this the murmur of yearning, 379 Tämä on huulteni kosketus sinun huuliasi, tämä kaipauksen murina,
    ellauri051.html on line 966: 380 This the far-off depth and height reflecting my own face, 380 Tämä kaukainen syvyys ja korkeus heijastavat omia kasvojani,
    ellauri051.html on line 967: 381 This the thoughtful merge of myself, and the outlet again. 381 Tämä on minun ja jälleen ulostulon harkittu yhdistäminen.
    ellauri051.html on line 973: 387 This hour I tell things in confidence, 387 Tällä hetkellä kerron asiat luottamuksella,
    ellauri051.html on line 994: 407 I know this orbit of mine cannot be swept by a carpenter's compass, 407 Tiedän, että tätä kiertorataa ei voi pyyhkiä puusepän kompassilla,
    ellauri051.html on line 1053: 464 What blurt is this about virtue and about vice? 464 Mitä hämärää tämä on hyveestä ja paheesta?
    ellauri051.html on line 1062: 473 This minute that comes to me over the past decillions, 473 Tämä minuutti, joka tulee minulle viimeisten kymmenien vuosien aikana,
    ellauri051.html on line 1077: 487 This is the lexicographer, this the chemist, this made a grammar of the old cartouches, 487 Tämä on sanakirjailija, tämä kemisti, tämä teki kieliopin vanhoista kartsoista,
    ellauri051.html on line 1079: 489 This is the geologist, this works with the scalpel, and this is a mathematician. 489 Tämä on geologi, tämä työskentelee skalpellilla, ja tämä on matemaatikko.
    ellauri051.html on line 1117: 526 This head more than churches, bibles, and all the creeds. 526 Tämä pää on enemmän kuin kirkot, raamatut ja kaikki uskontunnustukset.
    ellauri051.html on line 1128: 537 Trickling sap of maple, fibre of manly wheat, it shall be you! 537 Tihkuvaa vaahteran mehua, miehisen vehnän kuitua, se olet sinä!
    ellauri051.html on line 1167: 575 Happiness, (which whoever hears me let him or her set out in search of this day.) 575 Happiness, (joka joka kuulee minut, lähteköön etsimään tätä päivää.)
    ellauri051.html on line 1176: 583 To accrue what I hear into this song, to let sounds contribute toward it. 583 Keräämään kuulemani tähän lauluun, antamaan äänien vaikuttaa siihen.
    ellauri051.html on line 1183: 590 The judge with hands tight to the desk, his pallid lips pronouncing a death-sentence, 590 Tuomari kädet tiukasti pöytää vasten, kalpeat huulensa lausumassa kuolemantuomion,
    ellauri051.html on line 1186: 593 The steam whistle, the solid roll of the train of approaching cars, 593 Höyrypilli, lähestyvien autojen junan kiinteä rulla,
    ellauri051.html on line 1193: 600 Ah this indeed is music -- this suits me. 600 Ah tämä on todellakin musiikkia - tämä sopii minulle.
    ellauri051.html on line 1195: 602 The orbic flex of his mouth is pouring and filling me full. 602 Hänen suunsa orbinen jousto vuotaa ja täyttää minut täyteen.
    ellauri051.html on line 1196: 603 I hear the train'd soprano (what work with hers is this?) 603 Kuulen junan sopraanon (mikä työ hänen kanssaan tämä on?)
    ellauri051.html on line 1214: 619 Is this then a touch? quivering me to a new identity, 619 Onko tämä sitten kosketus? saa minut uuteen identiteettiin,
    ellauri051.html on line 1289: 690 Not one kneels to another, nor to his kind that lived thousands of years ago, 690 Kukaan ei polvistu toiselle eikä sukulaiselleen, joka eli tuhansia vuosia sitten,
    ellauri051.html on line 1323: 723 Where the rattlesnake suns his flabby length on a rock, where the otter is feeding on fish, 723 Siellä missä kalkkarokäärme paistaa velttoaan pituuteensa kalliolle, missä saukko ruokkii kaloja,
    ellauri051.html on line 1324: 724 Where the alligator in his tough pimples sleeps by the bayou, 724 Missä alligaattori kovissa näppyissään nukkuu lahden rannalla,
    ellauri051.html on line 1325: 725 Where the black bear is searching for roots or honey, where the beaver pats the mud with his paddle-shaped tail; 725 Missä mustakarhu etsii juuria tai hunajaa, missä majava taputtelee mutaa melan muotoisella hännällään;
    ellauri051.html on line 1333: 733 Where the quail is whistling betwixt the woods and the wheat-lot, 733 Siellä missä viiriäinen viheltää metsien ja vehnäerän välissä,
    ellauri051.html on line 1356: 756 Where the mocking-bird sounds his delicious gurgles, cackles, screams, weeps, 756 Siellä, missä pilkallinen lintu soi herkullisen kurinauksensa, kakituksensa, huutonsa, itkensä,
    ellauri051.html on line 1358: 758 Where the bull advances to do his masculine work, where the stud to the mare, where the cock is treading the hen, 758 Missä härkä etenee tekemään maskuliinista työtä, missä naaras tammalle, missä kukko polkee kanaa,
    ellauri051.html on line 1431: 831 All this I swallow, it tastes good, I like it well, it becomes mine, 831 Kaiken tämän nielen, se maistuu hyvältä, pidän siitä hyvin, siitä tulee minun,
    ellauri051.html on line 1436: 836 The twinges that sting like needles his legs and neck, the murderous buckshot and the bullets, 836 Pisteet, jotka pistävät kuin neuloja hänen jaloissaan ja niskassaan, murhaava laukaus ja luodit,
    ellauri051.html on line 1469: 869 Again gurgles the mouth of my dying general, he furiously waves with his hand, 869 Taas kurkuttaa kuolevan kenraalini suuta, hän heiluttaa raivokkaasti kädellään,
    ellauri051.html on line 1494: 893 A youth not seventeen years old seiz'd his assassin till two more came to release him, 893 Nuori, ei seitsemäntoista vuoden ikäinen, otti salamurhaajansa, kunnes kaksi muuta tuli vapauttamaan hänet,
    ellauri051.html on line 1502: 900 Our foe was no skulk in his ship I tell you, (said he,) 900 Vihollisemme ei ollut kallo hänen laivassaan, minä sanon teille, (hän ​​sanoi,)
    ellauri051.html on line 1506: 904 My captain lash'd fast with his own hands. 904 Kapteeni paastoi omin käsin.
    ellauri051.html on line 1521: 919 Two well serv'd with grape and canister silence his musketry and clear his decks. 919 Kaksi hyvin tarjoiltua viinirypäleen ja kapselin kera hiljentävät hänen muskettinsa ja tyhjentävät kannet.
    ellauri051.html on line 1522: 920 The tops alone second the fire of this little battery, especially the main-top, 920 Pelkät yläosat ovat tämän pienen pariston tulta toissijaisia, varsinkin pääkatto,
    ellauri051.html on line 1528: 926 He is not hurried, his voice is neither high nor low, 926 Hän ei ole kiireinen, hänen äänensä ei ole korkea eikä matala,
    ellauri051.html on line 1535: 932 The captain on the quarter-deck coldly giving his orders through a countenance white as a sheet, 932 Kapteeni neljänneskannella ja antoi käskynsä kylmästi valkoisena kuin lakana,
    ellauri051.html on line 1537: 934 The dead face of an old salt with long white hair and carefully curl'd whiskers, 934 Vanhan suolan kuolleet kasvot, pitkät valkoiset hiukset ja huolellisesti käpristyneet viikset,
    ellauri051.html on line 1545: 942 The hiss of the surgeon's knife, the gnawing teeth of his saw, 942 Kirurgin veitsen suhinaa, hänen sahan kalvavia hampaita,
    ellauri051.html on line 1556: 952 Not a mutineer walks handcuff'd to jail but I am handcuff'd to him and walk by his side, 952 Ei kapinaaja kävele käsiraudoissa vankilaan, mutta minä olen käsiraudoissa häneen ja kävelen hänen vierellään,
    ellauri051.html on line 1591: 985 They descend in new forms from the tips of his fingers, 985 Ne laskeutuvat uusissa muodoissa hänen sormiensa kärjestä,
    ellauri051.html on line 1592: 986 They are wafted with the odor of his body or breath, they fly out of the glance of his eyes. 986 Heitä leijuu hänen ruumiinsa tai hengityksensä haju, ne lentävät hänen silmiensä katseesta.
    ellauri051.html on line 1611: 1004 On his right cheek I put the family kiss, 1004 Hänen oikealle poskelleen annan perheen suudelman,
    ellauri051.html on line 1614: 1007 (This day I am jetting the stuff of far more arrogant republics.) 1007 (Tänä päivänä huutelen paljon ylimielisempien tasavaltojen tavaraa.)
    ellauri051.html on line 1637: 1029 Lithographing Kronos, Zeus his son, and Hercules his grandson, 1029 Kronoksen litografia, hänen poikansa Zeus ja pojanpoikansa Herkules,
    ellauri051.html on line 1640: 1032 With Odin and the hideous-faced Mexitli and every idol and image, 1032 Odinin ja kauhistuttavan ilmeen Mexitlin ja jokaisen epäjumalan ja kuvan kanssa,
    ellauri051.html on line 1646: 1038 Putting higher claims for him there with his roll'd-up sleeves driving the mallet and chisel, 1038 Asettamalla hänelle korkeampia vaatimuksia, kun hänen käärityt hihat ajavat vasaraa ja talttaa,
    ellauri051.html on line 1654: 1046 Selling all he possesses, traveling on foot to fee lawyers for his brother and sit by him while he is tried for forgery; 1046 Myydään kaiken omaisuutensa, matkustaa jalkaisin palkatakseen asianajajia veljelleen ja istuakseen hänen vierellään, kun häntä tuomitaan väärentämisestä;
    ellauri051.html on line 1667: 1058 Now the performer launches his nerve, he has pass'd his prelude on the reeds within. 1058 Nyt esiintyjä laukaisee hermonsa, hän on antanut alkusoittonsa sisällä olevaan kaistoon.
    ellauri051.html on line 1684: 1075 This is the city and I am one of the citizens, 1075 Tämä on kaupunki ja minä olen yksi asukkaista,
    ellauri051.html on line 1695: 1086 Not words of routine this song of mine, 1086 Ei rutiinin sanoja tämä lauluni,
    ellauri051.html on line 1697: 1088 This printed and bound book -- but the printer and the printing-office boy? 1088 Tämä painettu ja sidottu kirja -- mutta kirjapaino ja kirjapainopoika?
    ellauri051.html on line 1702: 1093 The saints and sages in history -- but you yourself? 1093 Pyhät ja viisaat historiassa – mutta sinä itse?
    ellauri051.html on line 1713: 1103 Dancing yet through the streets in a phallic procession, rapt and austere in the woods a gymnosophist, 1103 Tanssii silti katujen halki fallisessa kulkueessa, raivoissaan ja ankarasti metsässä voimistelija,
    ellauri051.html on line 1735: 1125 Nor the young woman who died and was put by his side, 1125 Eikä nuori nainen, joka kuoli ja joutui hänen viereensä,
    ellauri051.html on line 1780: 1169 Now on this spot I stand with my robust soul. 1169 Nyt tällä paikalla seison vahvalla sielullani.
    ellauri051.html on line 1799: 1187 My sun has his sun and round him obediently wheels, 1187 Auringollani on aurinko ja hänen ympärillään kuuliaisesti pyörät,
    ellauri051.html on line 1800: 1188 He joins with his partners a group of superior circuit, 1188 Hän liittyy kumppaneidensa joukkoon ylivoimaista kiertokulkua,
    ellauri051.html on line 1803: 1191 If I, you, and the worlds, and all beneath or upon their surfaces, were this moment reduced back to a pallid float, it would not avail in the long run,1191 Jos minä, sinä ja maailmat ja kaikki niiden pinnan alla tai päällä tämä hetki pelkistyisi kalpeaksi kelluksi, siitä ei olisi pitkällä aikavälillä mitään hyötyä,
    ellauri051.html on line 1817: 1204 No friend of mine takes his ease in my chair, 1204 Yksikään ystäväni ei lepää tuolissani,
    ellauri051.html on line 1833: 1220 This day before dawn I ascended a hill and look'd at the crowded heaven, 1220 Tänä päivänä ennen aamunkoittoa nousin mäelle ja katsoin tungosta taivasta,
    ellauri051.html on line 1835: 1222 And my spirit said No, we but level that lift to pass and continue beyond. 1222 Ja henkeni sanoi Ei, me vain tasoitamme tuon hissin ohittaaksemme ja jatkamme eteenpäin.
    ellauri051.html on line 1851: 1237 The boy I love, the same becomes a man not through derived power, but in his own right, 1237 Pojasta, jota rakastan, ei tule miestä johdetun voiman kautta, vaan omassa oikeutessaan,
    ellauri051.html on line 1853: 1239 Fond of his sweetheart, relishing well his steak, 1239 Rakastaa rakastettuaan, nauttii hyvin pihvistään,
    ellauri051.html on line 1872: 1258 The woodman that takes his axe and jug with him shall take me with him all day, 1258 Metsuri, joka ottaa mukaansa kirveensä ja kannunsa, vie minut mukaansa koko päivän,
    ellauri051.html on line 1878: 1264 My face rubs to the hunter's face when he lies down alone in his blanket, 1264 Kasvoni hierovat metsästäjän kasvoihin, kun hän makaa yksin peitossa,
    ellauri051.html on line 1879: 1265 The driver thinking of me does not mind the jolt of his wagon, 1265 Minua ajatteleva kuljettaja ei välitä vaununsa tärähdyksestä,
    ellauri051.html on line 1887: 1272 And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his own funeral drest in his shroud, 1272 Ja joka kulkee vakomatkan ilman myötätuntoa, kävelee omalle hautajaisliinalleen,
    ellauri051.html on line 1898: 1283 Why should I wish to see God better than this day? 1283 Miksi haluaisin nähdä Jumalan paremmin kuin tämä päivä?
    ellauri051.html on line 1906: 1290 To his work without flinching the accoucheur comes, 1290 Accoucheur tulee hänen työhönsä hätkähtämättä,
    ellauri051.html on line 1915: 1299 I hear you whispering there O stars of heaven, 1299 Kuulen sinun kuiskaavan siellä, oi taivaan tähdet,
    ellauri051.html on line 1923: 1307 I perceive that the ghastly glimmer is noonday sunbeams reflected, 1307 Ymmärrän, että kauhistuttava hohto on keskipäivän auringonsäteiden heijastuminen,
    ellauri051.html on line 1946: 1328 Who has done his day's work? who will soonest be through with his supper? 1328 Kuka on tehnyt päivätyönsä? kuka on pian valmis illallisesta?
    ellauri052.html on line 58: Henderson the Rain King is a 1959 novel by Saul Bellow. The book's blend of philosophical discourse and comic adventure has helped make it one of his more popular works. It is said to be Bellow's favorite among his books. It was ranked number 21 on Modern Library's list of the 100 Best Novels in the English language.
    ellauri052.html on line 60: Eugene Henderson is a troubled middle-aged man 1948. (synt. 1800-luvulla). Despite his riches, high social status, and physical prowess, he feels restless and unfulfilled, and harbors a spiritual void that manifests itself as an inner voice crying out "I want, I want, I want". Hoping to discover what the voice wants, Henderson goes to Africa. What a Yankee notion.
    ellauri052.html on line 62: Although it is unclear whether Henderson has truly found spiritual contentment, the novel ends with an optimistic and uplifting note. Henderson learns that a man can, with effort, have a spiritual rebirth when he realizes that spirit, body and the outside world are not enemies but can live in harmony. And he doesn't really need his family for anything, he is enough for himself.
    ellauri052.html on line 64: A week before the novel appeared in book stores, Saul Bellow published an article in the New York Times titled “The Search for Symbols, a Writer Warns, Misses All the Fun and Fact of the Story.” Here, Bellow warns readers against looking too deeply for symbols in his piece of shit. This has led to much discussion among critics as to why Bellow warned his readers against searching for symbolism just before the symbol-packed Rain King hit the shelves. Because there ain't any, its just Solomon's idea of fun and fact. The ongoing philosophical discussions and ramblings between Henderson and the natives, and inside Henderson's own head, prefigure elements of Bellow's next novel Herzog, which includes many such inquiries into life and meaning. And which is an even worse piece of narcissisim than this one.
    ellauri052.html on line 66: As in all Bellow's novels, death figures prominently in Henderson the Rain King. Also, the novel manifests a few common character types that run through Bellow's literary works. One type is the Bellovian Hero, often described as a schlemiel. Eugene Henderson, in company with most of Bellow's main characters, can be given this description, in the opinion of some people, and Bellow was another one himself for sure. Another is what Bellow calls the "Reality-Instructor"; in Henderson the Rain King, King Dahfu fills this role. In Seize the Day, the instructor is played by Dr. Tamkin, while in Humboldt's Gift, Humboldt von Fleisher takes the part.
    ellauri052.html on line 68: Scholars such as Bellow biographer James Atlas and others have shown that quite a few passages and ideas were lifted from a book titled The Cattle Complex in East Africa (1926) written by Bellow's anthropology professor Melville Herskovits who supervised his senior thesis at Northwestern University in 1937. What a schtekl, to steal from his own professor.
    ellauri052.html on line 83: In his survey of Bellow’s work, Philip Roth writes of Herzog, “In all of literature, I know of no more emotionally susceptible male, of no man who brings a greater focus or intensity to engagement with women than this Herzog,” a man “as lavish in describing the generous mistress as Renoir.” No siinä on pukki kaalimaan vartijana, Roth on mikäli mahdollista pahempi narsisti kuin Sale.
    ellauri052.html on line 85: I find this judgement troubling. Certainly, one can agree that Herzog is lavish and intense. But through his eyes, we see women as very peculiar creatures. We meet a devotee of sex in Herzog’s lover, Ramona, the sad, enigmatic, emotionless pencils that are Valentine’s wife and Herzog’s first wife, and the castrating sex bomb that is Madeline. Very rarely do we feel that these characterisations are different from these characters’ reality—the novel seems to suggest that these women really are as limited as Herzog sees them.
    ellauri052.html on line 87: And what is more regrettable still is how these same types reappear in Humboldt’s Gift. Citrine encounters three kinds of women in his travels: his lover Renata, a deceitful sexual priestess, Denise, his cold, hate-filled ex-wife, and a variety of leggy, doe-eyed students and secretaries.
    ellauri052.html on line 89: Harold Bloom is right to dismiss Bellow’s female characters of the later novels as “third-rate pipe dreams.” When a reader, holding Humboldt’s Gift in his hands, looks back at Augie March, the journey Saul Bellow has taken in his depiction of people is a very sad one. There is no way to compare the daring, principled Mimi Villars, Augie March’s one equal in oration, to the simple Ramona (Herzog), or to the comically shallow Renata (Humboldt’s Gift). Where is a woman equal to Augie’s Thea in these later books?
    ellauri052.html on line 93: It seems that as Bellow re-focused his lens on thought, and a main character’s deliberations over it, the fictional world around that central character darkened and cheapened. As the narrator / protagonist’s internal action grows, around him warmth and depth shrinks, until, by Humboldt’s Gift, it is clear that on a mental level, Citrine is utterly alone.
    ellauri052.html on line 95: This falling away of the world then renders the interplay of thought and reflection a sterile joke, as whatever the main character finally decides, there is no outside world for his deliberations to have meaning. Bellow has little choice, in the world of raging shadows he creates, other than to step away from the quest of thought at the climactic moment, and pretend he was only kidding.
    ellauri052.html on line 104: Bellow’s most merciless and eviscerating tormenter was his third wife, Susan Glassman, who defeated him in a long, acrimonious and expensive divorce suit. In 1974, after he had fraudulently misrepresented his projected income, the court, hostile to a successful Jewish intellectual, “ordered him to pay Susan $2,500 a month in alimony, backdated to 1968, plus $600 a month child support, plus lawyers’ fees.” Ignoring his own lawyer’s sound advice to settle the case, he surrendered to a self-destructive impulse, continued to appeal and deliberately prolonged his agony.
    ellauri052.html on line 108: I heard Bellow deliver the PEN speech on “American Writers and Their Public” to a packed hall in London on March 22, 1986. He had just suffered the death of his brothers and agonising break with Alexandra. Exhausted by jet-lag, stiff-gaited and parchment-skinned, he seemed terribly old and shattered. His talk ranged widely and wildly but, rambling and unfocused, he could not — like Ezra Pound in the Cantos — make it cohere.
    ellauri052.html on line 118: Reports of his teaching ranged from “he was a dud, all he did was read from Erich Auerbach’s Mimesis” to “his seminar was amazing, as you’d imagine.” He was most effective with students who could follow and respond to his intellectual fireworks.
    ellauri052.html on line 120: His favourite novelists, who recurred in his courses, were Dostoyevsky, Stendhal, Balzac, Flaubert, Dickens, Conrad, Dreiser and Fitzgerald. He also admired the satires of Wyndham Lewis.
    ellauri052.html on line 122: Bellow punctured the pretentious, unmasked the delusions and deflated the reputations of several intellectual phonies, blackballing LeRoi Jones, Edward Said and Susan Sontag for MacArthur fellowships. He was severely condemned for his provocative but hilarious challenge: “Who is the Tolstoy of the Zulus? The Proust of the Papuans?” But no one ever answered his attack on cultural relativism and he did not apologise.
    ellauri052.html on line 171: The novel, which Bellow initially intended to be a short story, is a roman à clef about Bellow's friendship with the poet Delmore Schwartz. It explores the changing relationship of art and power in a materialist America. This theme is addressed through the contrasting careers of two writers, Von Humboldt Fleisher (to some degree a version of Schwartz) and his protégé Charlie Citrine (to some degree a version of Bellow himself).
    ellauri052.html on line 191: Gangstereita se ihailee. Ne on kovia poikia. Tää kovajätkyyden ihannointi yhistää monia setämieskirjailijoita, oli ne kuinka piipunrasseja tai salakorsetteja oikeasti. Äkkiseltään tulee mieleen Salen lisäx Hemingvau, Conrad, Melville, Hannu Mäkelä jopa. Niitä on vaikka kuinka paljon.
    ellauri052.html on line 204: A manifold honey to smear his face,
    ellauri052.html on line 211: Boxes his brother in the hate-ridden city.
    ellauri052.html on line 215: Howls in his sleep for a world of sugar,
    ellauri052.html on line 217: Howls in his sleep because the tight-rope
    ellauri052.html on line 220: Dressed in his dress-suit, bulging his pants,
    ellauri052.html on line 221: Trembles to think that his quivering meat
    ellauri052.html on line 249: The bird called tentatively, whistled, called,
    ellauri052.html on line 250: Bubbled and whistled, so! Perplexed, still wet
    ellauri052.html on line 275: Alexander Pope does have slightly misogynistic tendencies, in part due to his own physical deformity making him somewhat unattractive.
    ellauri052.html on line 277: All in all, Pope’s characterization of women and his satirical telling of this incident paint a very negative picture of women. Women are shown as conniving, untrustful, illogical, and most importantly, inferior to men. Pope ridicules Belinda’s (Ms. Fermor’s) anger and does not seem to understand why women could get so angry over such a "trivial" matter. He does not respect female autonomy and buys in to the madonna/whore perception of women. The Rape of the Lock does a great injustice to women and only serves to perpetuate negative stereotypes and generalizations about female character.


    ellauri052.html on line 311: Journals contain numerous trivial details, which bear ample witness to the "plain living and high thinking" of the Wordsworth household—and, in this edition, samples of these details are given—but there is no need to record all the cases in which the sister wrote, "To-day I mended William's shirts," or "William gathered sticks," or "I went in search of eggs," etc. etc. In all cases, however, in which a sentence or paragraph, or several sentences and paragraphs, in the Journals are left out, the omission is indicated by means of asterisks. Nothing is omitted of any literary or biographical value.
    ellauri052.html on line 319: Like other successful duos, such as Batman & Robin, Mickey & Goofy, or Laurel & Hardy, Wordsworth and Coleridge were temperamentally dissimilar. Wordsworth, reserved and thoughtful, wrote verse while plodding to and fro in the garden and, we are told, was subject to stomach trouble when revising. Coleridge was irresponsible and debt-ridden, but everywhere spoken of as a genius, if a volatile one. “I think too much for a Poet,” he said. His addiction to opium began early and was never conquered. In time, it became his only regular habit.
    ellauri052.html on line 352: If you haven't been introduced to Desperate Ambrose, Old Timer, Willie and Pop Wimpus you've been missing a lot of good, clean American humor. C. M. Payne has found the real underlying humor in home life and brings it to you in this favorite of comic strip readers everywhere. "S'Motter Pop". Charles M. Payne (1873–1964) was an American cartoonist best known for his popular long-running comic strip S'Matter, Pop?[2]. He signed his work C. M. Payne and also adopted the nickname Popsy. In 1964, Payne died in poverty.
    ellauri052.html on line 359: To sail this ship o' mine?"
    ellauri052.html on line 367: And signed it wi his hand,
    ellauri052.html on line 379: A teir blinded his ee.
    ellauri052.html on line 381: "O wha is this has don this deid,
    ellauri052.html on line 382: This ill deid don to me,
    ellauri052.html on line 383: To send me out this time o' yeir,
    ellauri052.html on line 415: The Scots lords at his feit.
    ellauri052.html on line 433: Im Zuge der philosophischen Wirkungsgeschichte Nietzsches war für Martin Heidegger der „Wille zur Macht“ Nietzsches Antwort auf die metaphysische Frage nach dem Grund alles Seienden. So was.
    ellauri052.html on line 443: Das Ziel der Menschheit liegt nach Nietzsche nicht in der Zukunft oder im allgemeinen Wohlergehen der derzeit bestehenden Gattung, sondern in den immer wieder auftretenden „höchsten Exemplaren“, eben den Übermenschen. Aus dieser philosophischen Position resultiert seine Ablehnung der „idealistischen“ Interpretation des Übermenschen und die positive Einschätzung gerade von immoralistischen und nach Größe strebenden Machtmenschen wie Alkibiades, Julius Cäsar, Cesare Borgia oder Napoléon Bonaparte.
    ellauri052.html on line 451: Salen tediumin syyt on niitä entisiä: (1) autismi: muut ja maailman meno ei kiinnosta, (2) Narshishmi : tiukka keskittyminen omaan napanöyhtäänsä.
    ellauri052.html on line 465: Mikä oli Salen myymä kissa? Kai se oli amerikkalainen kyldyyri. "If this Kamuttu (joku aarikkalainen notmii nokikeppi) really has a mountain of beryllium we should go there and grab it." Tää oli se vaurastuneiden jenkkien seuraava
    ellauri052.html on line 471: Kyllähän toi Sale välistä haukkuu izeään suht tarkkasilmäisesti, mut vähintään yhtä usein se panee stoogensa kehumaan izeään aivan päättömästi. Se on miälestään Hegelin tarkoittama maailmanhistoriallinen yxilö, kuten Trump.
    ellauri052.html on line 491: The opportunity to show a semi-nude young male, often in a contorted pose, made Sebastian a favorite subject. There may have been a deliberate attempt by the Church to get away from the single nude subject, as sometimes arousing inappropriate thoughts among female and male churchgoers. Archers and arrows have been far more commonly shown than the actual moment of his death by clubbing, so that there is a popular misperception that this is how he died. Sebastian is a popular male saint, especially among athletes.
    ellauri052.html on line 493: In his novella Death in Venice, Thomas Mann hails the "Sebastian-Figure" as the supreme emblem of Apollonian beauty, that is, the artistry of differentiated forms; beauty as measured by discipline, proportion, and luminous distinctions. Juu tähän Tompan Venezian seikkailuun Sale vinkkaa myös. Hizi mikä sanaristikko on Salella tässä homostelun peittona. Täähän on kuin Proustin Albertine ja Gilbertine. Mafioso törkkää Salen sykkivään punanahkasisuxiseen autoonn takapuolesta. Polly on pelkkää hämäystä, statisti niinkuin Sepen nuolenreijät paikannut leski Irene tai Lemminkäisen äiskä.
    ellauri052.html on line 497: Eventually, the poetry of William Wordsworth showed him that beauty generates compassion for others and stimulates joy. With renewed joy he continued to work towards a just society, but with more relish for the journey. He considered this one of the most pivotal shifts in his thinking. In fact, many of the differences between him and his father stemmed from this expanded source of joy. :D
    ellauri052.html on line 545: Nimitys antroposofia on vanhahko. Fichte käytti sitä. Rudi teki Fichtestä paskakaivoväitöskirjan. Rudi otti sanan käyttöön riitaannuttuaan teosofiseuran kaa. Ne oli liian brittejä ja itämaisia, Rudi halus jotain saxalaisempaa. Rudin versio on olevinaan pseudotieteellistä napaan tuijotusta ja nöyhdän lajittelua: imaginatio, inspiratio, intuitio. Kuvittelua, sisäänhengitystä ja sinne kazomista. Mitenkä ne jaxavat. Samaa sieluhöpötystä se vaan on, vaikka uusilla tuotenimillä ("astraaliruumis", haha). Narsishtien on vaikee uskoa et maailma jatkuu ilman minua. Olen ihmisyyden edustaja, Hegelin historian individi, humanismin piirimyyjä. Olen sitäpaizi erilainen kuin muut, muhun sattuu kuolema.
    ellauri052.html on line 572: By this time, Steiner, had reached considerable stature as a spiritual teacher and expert in the occult. Optikkoexpertti, piilolaseja. Rudin lahkosta tuli antroposoofeja. Helluntaiystäviä. Jumalviisaus aleni vaan ihmisviisasteluxi.
    ellauri052.html on line 574: He spoke about what he considered to be his direct experience of the Akashic Records (sometimes called the "Akasha Chronicle"), thought to be a spiritual chronicle of the history, pre-history, and future of the world and mankind.
    ellauri052.html on line 578: Just tämmösestä Sale haaveili. Eipä juuri kehittynyt, pahemmaxi vaan vanhemmiten meni. Schweizin Dornachissa teosoofeilla on valtava tabernaakkeli nimeltä Goetheanum. Ekan poltti nazit, toinen rakennettiin betonista. Goethepa tietysti, siinä meillä oli toinen narsisti ihan säästökokoa. Narshishtien Jerusalem.
    ellauri052.html on line 588: Antroposofit on tosi siveitä, sip sip, söp söp. Bylsikö Rudi koskaan ketään? He refrained from sex. But he was a man on another level, sanoo joku uskovainen. Toinen sanoo: Steiner said very little about sexuality (just as he never explained to anthroposophists how to screw in a light bulb, which is why there is no answer to the question of: "How many anthroposophists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?").
    ellauri052.html on line 597: He was a man who convinced and hypnotized not only others but himself. He seemed to possess a number of characters which he changed like masks as the need arose, now he was a benevolent pastor … now a magician holding sway over human souls … His sole purpose and aspiration was to obtain possession of all things from below, by his own titanic devices, and to break through by a passionate effort to the realm of the spirit… He may have possessed oratorical gifts, but he lacked the true gift and feeling for words. His speech was a kind of magical act, aimed at obtaining control over his hearers by means of gestures, by raising and lowering his voice, and by changes in the expression of his face. He hypnotized his disciples, some of whom even fell asleep.
    ellauri052.html on line 603: Sit on vielä nää ruusuristiläiset, joilla on kesäpaikka Sysmässä, Pekka Ervastin kotitilalla. Suomalaisen ruusuristiläisyyden johtohahmo Pekka Ervast (1875-1934), pyylevähkö mies, oli lähtöisin teosofian piiristä. Hän uskoi aikansa teosofien tavoin Christian Rosenkreutzin olleen historiallinen henkilö ja että tämä ei välttämättä ollut ensimmäinen länsimainen salatieteilijä. Ervastin mukaan, oli ruusuristiläistä salaseuraa koskaan ollut olemassa näkyvässä maailmassa tai ei, se on joka tapauksessa ollut ja on edelleen näkymättömässä henkimaailmassa.
    ellauri052.html on line 626: Teosofi Charles Leadbeater näki Krishnamurtin rannalla Adyarissa keväällä 1909. Hän väitti nähneensä Krishnamurtilla hienomman auran kuin kenelläkään aikaisemmin ja vakuuttui siitä, että Krishnamurti oli hänen etsimänsä inkarnaatio. Yli puolen jalan aura uimahousuissa oli Jiddu-pojalla. Krishnamurti otettiin veljensä Nityan kanssa asumaan seuran tiloihin, ja Leadbeater alkoi antaa hänelle "yksityisopetusta". Jiddo's father lost a lawsuit trying to regain custody of his son. His Lawsuit accused Leadbeater, who was probably gay, of having had sexual relations with Jiddo.
    ellauri052.html on line 652: It was not just Bohm who fell under the sway of Krishnamurti's charisma. He strongly influenced such writers as Joseph Campbell, the poet Robinson Jeffers, Henry Miller, Aldous Huxley, and Alan Watts who churned out popular books about Zen Buddhism. George Bernard Shaw once called young Krishnamurti "the most beautiful human being" he ever saw. Cabinet faggot. After visiting Krishnamurti's castle in Holland, Campbell wrote in a letter: "I can scarcely think of anything but the wisdom-and-beauty-of-my friend." In another letter he said, "Every time I talk with Krishna, something new amazes me."
    ellauri052.html on line 654: There were two Krishnamurtis. One was the persona presented to the world through lectures and books; a man without ego who led a sanctified life of celibacy and high moral purity. The other Krishnamurti was a shadowy, self-centered, vain man, capable of sudden angers and enormous cruelty to friends. He was also a habitual liar. Krishna, as his friends called him, freely admitted his compulsive lying. He blamed it on simple fear of having his deceptions detected.
    ellauri052.html on line 656: After learning about Krishnamurti's secret love affair with his best friend's wife, Bohm felt betrayed. Perhaps this plunged him into his third and final deep depression. Hospitalized, suffering from paranoia and thoughts of suicide, Bohm underwent fourteen episodes of shock therapy before he recovered sufficiently to leave the mental hospital. Earlier triple bypass surgery on his heart had been successful, but his death in 1991, at age 75, was from a massive heart attack. Krishnamurti had died six years earlier, at his home in Ojai, of pancreatic cancer. His body was cremated.
    ellauri052.html on line 674: Sale tuntee vetoa myös Arabian Larskaan. T.E. Lawrence on kuvissa kyllä peräpään pojan näköinen. Se rakasti upseereja ja kaipasi miehexi miesten keskelle miehistöön. Liittyi ilmaväkeen sodan jälkeen vaan saadaxeen olla niitä lähellä. Desired to be a part of something larger than himself. Se oli luultavasti masokisti (iskä löi sitä pienenä) ja piilohomo. Ajeli moottoripyörällä kuin joku Tom of Finland hahmo. Väisti 46 vuotiaana 1935 jotain polkupyöräilijä poikia mutkassa ja ajoi pöpelikköön. Pää hajosi. Siitä kexittiin käyttää moottoripyöräillessä kypäriä.
    ellauri052.html on line 676: T.E. was born out of wedlock in August 1888 to Sarah Junner, a governess, and Thomas Chapman, an Anglo-Irish nobleman. Chapman left his wife and family in Ireland to cohabit with Junner. Chapman and Junner called themselves Mr and Mrs Lawrence, the surname of Sarah's likely father; her mother had been employed as a servant for a Lawrence family when she became pregnant with Sarah.
    ellauri052.html on line 680: Siegfried Sassoon oli upseeri ja runoilija. Ei kai lähisukua kampaaja Vidal Sassoonille paizi että ovat juutalaisia. Siegfried oli homo, ensin piilo- sitten avo- mutta meni lopuxi naimisiin ja teki pojan.
    ellauri052.html on line 681:

    E.M. Forster was homosexual (openly to his close friends, but not to the public) and a lifelong bachelor. Se tykkäs tosi paljon D.H. Lawrencen homoeroottisista skeneistä.
    ellauri052.html on line 687: Apparently his wife Frieda believed him to have had a sexual relationship with a farmer while writing Women in Love in 1916. There's also the coal miner quote you mentioned Kelby. Then there's the quote: I should like to know why nearly every man that approaches greatness tends to homosexuality, whether he admits it or not... (Älkää yrittäkökään! Mä en ole! Sitäpaizi mä en ole lähelläkään suuruutta! Pienenen kuin pyy maailmanlopun edellä.)
    ellauri052.html on line 692: I left myself quite limply in his hands, and, to get a better grip of me, he put his arm round me and pressed me against him, and the sweetnesS of the touch of our naked bodies one against the other was superb. It satistied in some measure the vague indecipherable yearning of my soul; and it was the same with him. When he had rubbed me all warm, he let me go, and we lo0ked at each other with eyes of
    ellauri052.html on line 712: The man went. Gerald turned to Birkin with his eyes lighted.
    ellauri052.html on line 741: Gerald fastened the door and pushed the furniture aside. The room was large, there was plenty of space, it was thickly carpeted. Then he quickly threw off his clothes, and waited for Birkin. The latter, white and thin, came over to him. Birkin was more a presence than a visible object, Gerald was aware of him completely, but not really visually. Whereas Gerald himself was concrete and noticeable, a piece of pure final substance.
    ellauri052.html on line 743: `Now,' said Birkin, `I will show you what I learned, and what I remember. You let me take you so --' And his hands closed on the naked body of the other man. In another moment, he had Gerald swung over lightly and balanced against his knee, head downwards. Relaxed, Gerald sprang to his feet with eyes glittering.
    ellauri052.html on line 747: So the two men began to struggle together. They were very dissimilar. Birkin was tall and narrow, his bones were very thin and fine. Gerald was much heavier and more plastic. His bones were strong and round, his limbs were rounded, all his contours were beautifully and fully moulded. He seemed to stand with a proper, rich weight on the face of the earth, whilst Birkin seemed to have the centre of gravitation in his own middle. And Gerald had a rich, frictional kind of strength, rather mechanical, but sudden and invincible, whereas Birkin was abstract as to be almost intangible. He impinged invisibly upon the other man, scarcely seeming to touch him, like a garment, and then suddenly piercing in a tense fine grip that seemed to penetrate into the very quick of Gerald´s being.
    ellauri052.html on line 751: So the two men entwined and wrestled with each other, working nearer and nearer. Both were white and clear, but Gerald flushed smart red where he was touched, and Birkin remained white and tense. He seemed to penetrate into Gerald´s more solid, more diffuse bulk, to interfuse his body through the body of the other, as if to bring it subtly into subjection, always seizing with some rapid necromantic fore-knowledge every motion of the other flesh, converting and counteracting it, playing upon the limbs and trunk of Gerald like some hard wind. It was as if Birkin´s whole physical intelligence interpenetrated into Gerald´s body, as if his fine, sublimated energy entered into the flesh of the fuller man, like some potency, casting a fine net, a prison, through the muscles into the very depths of Gerald´s physical being.
    ellauri052.html on line 755: At length Gerald lay back inert on the carpet, his breast rising in great slow panting, whilst Birkin kneeled over him, almost unconscious. Birkin was much more exhausted. He caught little, short breaths, he could scarcely breathe any more. The earth seemed to tilt and sway, and a complete darkness was coming over his mind. He did not know what happened. He slid forward quite unconscious, over Gerald, and Gerald did not notice. Then he was half-conscious again, aware only of the strange tilting and sliding of the world. The world was sliding, everything was sliding off into the darkness. And he was sliding, endlessly, endlessly away.
    ellauri052.html on line 757: He came to consciousness again, hearing an immense knocking outside. What could be happening, what was it, the great hammer-stroke resounding through the house? He did not know. And then it came to him that it was his own heart beating. But that seemed impossible, the noise was outside. No, it was inside himself, it was his own heart. And the beating was painful, so strained, surcharged. He wondered if Gerald heard it. He did not know whether he were standing or lying or falling.
    ellauri052.html on line 759: When he realised that he had fallen prostrate upon Gerald´s body he wondered, he was surprised. But he sat up, steadying himself with his hand and waiting for his heart to become stiller and less painful. It hurt very much, and took away his consciousness.
    ellauri052.html on line 765: Birkin heard the sound as if his own spirit stood behind him, outside him, and listened to it. His body was in a trance of exhaustion, his spirit heard thinly. His body could not answer. Only he knew his heart was getting quieter. He was divided entirely between his spirit, which stood outside, and knew, and his body, that was a plunging, unconscious stroke of blood.
    ellauri052.html on line 769: `Yes,' said Birkin, hardening his throat and producing the words in the tension there, `you're much stronger than I -- you could beat me -- easily.'
    ellauri052.html on line 771: Then he relaxed again to the terrible plunging of his heart and his blood.
    ellauri052.html on line 777: He still heard as if it were his own disembodied spirit hearing, standing at some distance behind him. It drew nearer however, his spirit. And the violent striking of blood in his chest was sinking quieter, allowing his mind to come back. He realised that he was leaning with all his weight on the soft body of the other man. It startled him, because he thought he had withdrawn. He recovered himself, and sat up. But he was still vague and unestablished. He put out his hand to steady himself. It touched the hand of Gerald, that was lying out on the floor. And Gerald's hand closed warm and sudden over Birkin's, they remained exhausted and breathless, the one hand clasped closely over the other. It was Birkin whose hand, in swift response, had closed in a strong, warm clasp over the hand of the other. Gerald´s clasp had been sudden and momentaneous.
    ellauri052.html on line 779: The normal consciousness however was returning, ebbing back. Birkin could breathe almost naturally again. Gerald´s hand slowly withdrew, Birkin slowly, dazedly rose to his feet and went towards the table. He poured out a whiskey and soda. Gerald also came for a drink.
    ellauri052.html on line 796: `Certainly it is,' said Gerald. Then he laughed pleasantly, adding: `It's rather wonderful to me.' He stretched out his arms handsomely.
    ellauri052.html on line 806: `You think I am beautiful -- how do you mean, physically?' asked Gerald, his eyes glistening.
    ellauri052.html on line 810: Gerald laughed in his throat, and said:
    ellauri052.html on line 812: `That's certainly one way of looking at it. I can say this much, I feel better. It has certainly helped me. Is this the Bruderschaft you wanted?'
    ellauri052.html on line 814: `Perhaps. Do you think this pledges anything?'
    ellauri052.html on line 828: `No? There you are, we are not alike. I'll put a dressing-gown on.' Birkin remained alone, looking at the fire. His mind had reverted to Ursula. She seemed to return again into his consciousness. Gerald came down wearing a gown of broad-barred, thick black-and-green silk, brilliant and striking.
    ellauri052.html on line 836: Birkin was silent, thinking how scrupulous Gerald was in his attire, how expensive too. He wore silk socks, and studs of fine workmanship, and silk underclothing, and silk braces. Curious! This was another of the differences between them. Birkin was careless and unimaginative about his own appearance.
    ellauri052.html on line 840: Birkin laughed. He was looking at the handsome figure of the other man, blond and comely in the rich robe, and he was half thinking of the difference between it and himself -- so different; as far, perhaps, apart as man from woman, yet in another direction. But really it was Ursula, it was the woman who was gaining ascendance over Birkin´s being, at this moment. Gerald was becoming limp again, lapsing out of him.
    ellauri052.html on line 852: Bellow’s great subject is his own subjectivity. “If I had as many mouths as Siva has arms and kept them going all the time,” says Joseph, the novel’s Bellow-like protagonist, sounding a little like Walt Whitman, “I still could not do myself justice.”
    ellauri052.html on line 856: Well into his career, Bellow combined the confessional with a mid-century notion of alienation, which meant, for Bellow, man’s inability to get outside his own head. (I use the masculine advisedly; Bellow didn’t go deep enough into women’s heads to need to get out of them.)
    ellauri052.html on line 857: Leader (Salen elämäkerturi) is statesmanlike, fair-minded. He acknowledges in the introduction that great artists are not necessarily family men and that Bellow helped himself to his friends’ and relatives’ life stories even when they would have preferred their privacy.
    ellauri052.html on line 867: Reports of his teaching ranged from “he was a dud, all he did was read from Erich Auerbach’s Mimesis” to “his seminar was amazing, as you’d imagine.” He was most effective with students who could follow and respond to his intellectual fireworks. Eskimeininkiä.
    ellauri052.html on line 868: His favourite novelists, who recurred in his courses, were Dostoyevsky, Stendhal, Balzac, Flaubert, Dickens, Conrad, Dreiser and Fitzgerald. He also admired the satires of Wyndham Lewis.
    ellauri052.html on line 870: Bellow punctured the pretentious, unmasked the delusions and deflated the reputations of several intellectual phonies, blackballing LeRoi Jones, Edward Said and Susan Sontag for MacArthur fellowships. He was severely condemned for his provocative but hilarious challenge: “Who is the Tolstoy of the Zulus? The Proust of the Papuans?” But no one ever answered his attack on cultural relativism and he did not apologise
    ellauri052.html on line 875: Sale is more important than you he is a leader in his field, a Pulitzer winner, a shoveleer, friend of dead president Kennedy, and dead senator the same, and von Humboldt. Sanoo Sale Salesta. Hupasaa et Jasun kotkan uran huippuhetki oli kun John F. Kennedy rotkautti sitä. Vielä hupasampaa et se oli Jasustakin hienoa.
    ellauri052.html on line 878: Muu maailma on kaikki "those terrorists". Treatening our legitimate vital interests everywhere. The last time I troubled to read the newspaper I noted that an oil company, after paying a ransom of $10M, was still unable to obtain the release of one of its executives from his Argentine kidnappers. C'est beaucoup d'argent pour un Americain. The flabbiness of the U.S.A. is disheartening. We are setting the world a miserable example by allowing ourselves to be bullied.
    ellauri052.html on line 881: I heard Bellow deliver the PEN speech on “American Writers and Their Public” to a packed hall in London on March 22, 1986. He had just suffered the death of his brothers and agonising break with Alexandra. Exhausted by jet-lag, stiff-gaited and parchment-skinned, he seemed terribly old and shattered. His talk ranged widely and wildly but, rambling and unfocused, he could not — like Ezra Pound in the Cantos — make it cohere.
    ellauri052.html on line 930: Kun Salen halvexima sen vanhin poika psykiatri sanoo suorat sanat paskamaisesta isästään, pörähtään sen kimppuun äkäinen lauma Salen kirjallisia häntäkärpäsiä. The difficulty Greg Bellow has in grasping his father’s work is almost immediately apparent. His literary interpretations range from calling Humboldt’s Gift (1975) “a novel permeated by death consciousness” to writing that the protagonist of Henderson the Rain King (1959) “chooses a life path that brings him into contact with suffering and death.” (The very phrase “life path” would undoubtedly have made his father cringe.) Ehkäpä, just six että se on osuvaa.
    ellauri052.html on line 931: Oddly, Greg expresses frustration with a father “whose deepest desire was to keep his thoughts and his feelings strictly to himself,” as if Bellow did not spend nearly 70 years sharing those thoughts and feelings with millions of readers.

    ellauri052.html on line 933: Haha se jako kyllä ize ahkerasti kiillottamaansa kuvaa izestään. Sen izehaukut on laskelmoituja ja päätyy aina korostamaan sen jaloutta. Saul reserved for art what his eldest son sought from him in life. Kumartaa yleisölle ja pyllistää perheille. Hintelä kalansilmä panomies.
    ellauri052.html on line 935: Ultimately, much of the book revolves around a perceived opposition between “young Saul,” the politically radical, amorously multitasking free spirit who raised him, and “old Saul,” the reactionary, race-baiting friend of authority and Allan Bloom who occupied his father’s body for its final 40 years. Greg had a front-row seat for Bellow’s supposed conversion, after the rise of black power and the Six Day War, to the unfashionable conservatism that remains the unspoken reason his books aren’t read much in America today. He is thus well-placed to describe how that change—dramatically evident in Mr. Sammler’s Planet (1970), the neo-con novel par excellence, but also in Herzog—manifested itself in private.
    ellauri052.html on line 937: Luikero Sale alkaa komennella porukoita heti kun sillä on pätäkkää. Se oli kuin Joosef Ebyktissä. Vassarimamusta tuli menestyxen mukana siirtomaasotien kova jenkkihaukka. Tabletin kriitikko Kreitner, jutku sekin, on joku salebändäri joka ei pidä vanhasta vassarista Gregistä. Ei Salekaan, psykoanalyytikko Greg on ikävä jäänne Salen köyhistä vuosista. Greg sanoo Salea kirjallisuussalonkileijonaxi, mistä kriitikkobändäri pahastuu. Vaan sitähän se oli mitä suurimmassa määrin.
    ellauri052.html on line 939: Greg had made a career out of his own childhood misery—a nasty dig given that Saul was as much the author of that misery as he was of his novels. Greg noted, with shrugging disapproval, that his father “felt a duty of truth to his readers that was stronger than to his family,” but indicated he still didn’t understand or accept this about his father. Perhaps he can’t be expected to. “All significant human business is transacted inside,” was Saul’s lesson to Greg, who doesn’t seem to have forgiven his father for it being true.
    ellauri052.html on line 941: Mit vit? Narshishtikriitikkoko tässä puolustaa narshishtinarria? Meillä on velvollisuutemme lukevalle yleisölle. Pois Greg kuvan reunasta säheltämästä, me ollaan nyt ruudussa.
    ellauri052.html on line 943: It may be helpful to note here that Bellow’s fame, already growing after The Adventures of Augie March, exploded after the publication of Herzog in 1964—the same year Daniel, his youngest son, was born. By the time the newly rich writer, urged by his third wife, moved into a fancy co-op on Lake Michigan, Greg already possessed enough of what he thought were his own opinions to dislike the white plush carpets, the 11 rooms “filled with fancy furniture and modern art.” Reminding the reader he was “raised by a frugal mother and a father who had no steady income,” Greg says that he “found the trappings of wealth in their new apartment so repellent that I complained bitterly to Saul,” who replied that he didn’t care about the new shiny things so long as he could still write—which he could. “As I always had, I accepted what he said about art at face value,” Greg admits, but he stopped visiting the new place. After the marriage deteriorated and Saul moved out, 3-year-old Daniel, in the words of ex-child-therapist Greg, “took to expressing his distress” by peeing on the carpets. “I have to admit that the yellow stains on them greatly pleased me,” Greg writes—for once showing off the Bellovian touch.
    ellauri052.html on line 945: Zachary Leader’s work, though superior to Atlas’s and better than his first volume, still has some serious flaws. He swallows Keith Botsford’s absurd claim that his subject “is a direct descendant of Machiavelli”. Leader constantly tries to connect every person and event in Bellow’s life to their fictional counterparts instead of emphasising his imaginative transformation of experience. Literary agent Andrew Wylie, well named “The Jackal,” poached Bellow from his longtime agent Harriet Wasserman.
    Varmaan lupas Salelle pyllynamia.


    ellauri052.html on line 947: His good looks, exciting mind, sharp wit and exalted reputation were catnip to the ladies, whom he easily captured but could not control. Though not cut out for marriage, he had five wives and divorced the first four. One of his three sons explained, “He liked being taken care of. He liked beautiful, intelligent, spirited women. He didn’t like being bored.” Except in the arse.
    ellauri052.html on line 949: Only his last wife, Janis Freedman, who was 43 years younger, redeemed his marital failures and fulfilled his expectations. Plain and pliant, Canadian, Jewish and well-educated, she devoted her life to Bellow. She became his amanuensis, household major domo, surrogate parent, guardian of the flame and mother of his child when the biblical patriarch was 84. Hiljaiset ja halukkaat, ketterät ja kurvikkaat, sellaiset me haluaisimme. Jasu ja Jörkka yxissä kansissa.
    ellauri052.html on line 952: Oppressed and heavy-hearted, Bellow resorted to subtle concealment of competing mistresses, moved around like a man on the run and needed bursts of frenetic activity, “even if it means constant trips to Japan, London, Yugoslavia or Israel to keep one jump ahead” of his emotional entanglements.
    ellauri052.html on line 957: Bellow was accused of being a “lousy” sexual performer, but was more convincingly called a passionate and virile lover. He even had a fling with his black cleaning lady, “about twice as tall as he was, and well built.” No hemmetti, kysyttiinkö siivoojalta miten mini Sale pärjäsi. Tais heiluttaa patonkia porttikonkissa.
    ellauri052.html on line 959: During an awkward sexual encounter with Harriet Wasserman, she remembered “asking him for permission, as if it were a museum objet d’art, ‘Can I touch this?’” Many of his mistresses remained in love and in touch with him. Scott Fitzgerald said that Hemingway “needed a new woman for each big book”; Bellow lost a woman with each big book. He spilled sperm as he spilled ink, and sex both interfered with and inspired his writing. Bellow created and lived on turbulence, thrived on chaos, courted conflict and was inspired by personal cataclysm. He reported that one lover (mies vai nainen?) “caused me grandes dificultades in England and in the south, but I finished Sammler just the same.” The bearers of erogenous zones (either sex) made him feel younger, “it was a way of avoiding the Angel of Death,” and he cherished their provocative bitchiness. Bellow’s emotional upheavals — his guilt and remorse, multitudinous failings and need for self-condemnation — made him beat his breast at his private Wailing Wall. Se oli kuin kunkku David jolle tuotiin neitosia pyllynlämmittimixi.
    ellauri052.html on line 961: He portrayed his ex-wives, before and after they divorced him, as they declined from goddess to devil. Their sexual betrayals and financial extortions supplied the mother lode of his fictional material and generated the misogyny and guilt that fueled his creative powers. He exalted his fourth wife, the Gentile Romanian mathematician Alexandra Tulcea, as the “translucent Minna gazing at the stars” in The Dean’s December and crucified her as the “ferocious, chaos-dispensing Vela” in Ravelstein.
    ellauri052.html on line 963: No ex tää nyt kuulosta nashishtiselta? Ihankuin Philip Roth.
    ellauri052.html on line 965: Bellow's wives were Anita Goshkin, Alexandra (Sondra) Tsachacbasov, Susan Glassman, Alexandra Ionescu Tulcea, and Janis Freedman. In 2000, when he was 84, Bellow had his fourth child and first daughter, with Freedman. Goshkin elätti sitä tunarointivuosina. Sen se dumppas kun alko tulla rahaa. Se oli kuin se Jasun ykkönen.
    ellauri052.html on line 968: Bellow’s most merciless and eviscerating tormenter was his third wife, Susan Glassman, who defeated him in a long, acrimonious and expensive divorce suit. In 1974, after he had fraudulently misrepresented his projected income, the court, hostile to a successful Jewish intellectual, “ordered him to pay Susan $2,500 a month in alimony, backdated to 1968, plus $600 a month child support, plus lawyers’ fees.” Ignoring his own lawyer’s sound advice to settle the case, he surrendered to a self-destructive impulse, continued to appeal and deliberately prolonged his agony.
    ellauri052.html on line 970: The rap against Bellow is that he maligned four of his five wives, especially in his fiction. This is true, and Leader is savvy enough not to take Bellow’s word about them. Wife No. 1, Anita, is shown as the underappreciated mainstay she obviously was. As for wife No. 2, Sondra Tschacbasov Bellow (Bellow called her Sasha), the model for the evil Madeleine, Leader has a scoop: an unpublished memoir shared with him after Bellow’s death. By her own account, Sasha was a vulnerable child-woman lacking basic life skills. From childhood and into her teens, she says, she was the victim of incest committed by her father. When Bellow took up with her, he was 37 and she was 21, a Bennington graduate and a secretary at the Partisan Review. His friends treated her with a sniggering sexism unfortunately unremarkable in the 1950s. At a party Bellow took her to, the critic R. W. B. Lewis, her former professor, drunkenly demanded to
    ellauri052.html on line 978: The most important person in Bellow’s life—Maury, his oldest brother. As Leader shows, Maury was both the driving force in Bellow’s Americanization and a major presence in his work. Parents and wives came and went, but Maury remained: Simon in Augie March, Shura in Herzog, Julius in Humboldt’s Gift. As peremptory and violent as their father but more competent, Maury epitomized the cult of power and material success that both fascinated and repelled Bellow. “I recognized in him the day-to-day genius of the U.S.A.,” Bellow said in an interview with Philip Roth. In the same conversation, Roth observed that Maury’s reckless, angry spirit was “the household deity of Augie March.” By the time Maury finished law school, he had already started collecting graft for a corrupt Illinois state representative, skimming off the top for himself and his mother. A charismatic ladies’ man with an illegitimate son, Maury was “very proud of his extraordinary group of connections, his cynicism, his insiderhood,” Bellow told Roth. Maury was disdainful of his brother’s nonremunerative choice of profession, which he considered luftmenschlich—frivolous, impractical.
    ellauri052.html on line 980: The rivalry between the brothers may have been even more extreme in life than it was in art. When Bellow won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1976, his brother refused to come to Stockholm for the ceremony. Maury’s grandson reconstructed his thinking as follows: “How dare Saul win the Nobel Prize when I’m really the smart one, I’m the one.”
    ellauri052.html on line 991: Muu maailma on kaikki "those terrorists". Treatening our legitimate vital interests everywhere. The last time I troubled to read the newspaper I noted that an oil company, after paying a ransom of $10M, was still unable to obtain the release of one of its executives from his Argentine kidnappers. C'est beaucoup d'argent pour un Americain. The flabbiness of the U.S.A. is disheartening. We are setting the world a miserable example by allowing ourselves to be bullied.
    ellauri052.html on line 1005: Wilt Whatman, Waldo Emerson ja lättänenä Plato oli kaikki salen henkisiä kusipäitä sielunveljiä. 2 lisää: Dante ja Dostojevski. Kaikki Salen herot on narshishteja, misogyynejä ja vähintään piilohomoja. Niinkuin se. Ei se ihaile kuin kaltaisiaan mulkkuja. Sale ja sen isokannuinen Renata luuska on aivan hemmetinmoisia moukkia. Samaa luokkaa kuin Jasu ja sen kotka.
    ellauri053.html on line 123: Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Fichte, Hegel, James, Bergson all are united in one earnest attempt, the attempt to reinstate man with his high spiritual claims in a place of importance in the cosmic scheme.
    ellauri053.html on line 131: A more scientifically oriented philosophy of change than Bergon's was developed between the wars by A. N. Whitehead particularly in his book Process and Reality.
    ellauri053.html on line 138: One of Sainte-Beuve's critical contentions was that, in order to understand an artist and his work, it was necessary to understand that artist's biography. Marcel Proust took issue with this notion and repudiated it in a set of essays, Contre Sainte-Beuve ("Against Sainte-Beuve"). Proust developed the ideas first voiced in those essays in À la recherche du temps perdu (In Search of Lost Time).
    ellauri053.html on line 461: Hep nyt löyty Uarnen oma selvitys mitä eroa tulkinnalla ja selityxellä. Tulkinta on semantiikkaa. Sananselitystä. Zygofyysinen tai historiallinen selitys vois olla lopullinen ja oikea, sananselitys on vaan kielipeliä. Taskubiljardia niinko. Tää on ehkä tää meidän ikuisuuskiista taas kerran uus- ja vanhakritiikin välillä.
    ellauri053.html on line 503: Mies on ainoana henkilö, mieheen aina kuuluu melankolia. Nainen on miehen paras ystävä. Niin aina. Ota vittu koira. Pandora, tai Killi. Alkupuolella pojilla on tyyntä melankoliaa, loppupeleissä sit rähistään. Niin koiratkin.
    ellauri053.html on line 535: The Language of Criticism was originally Casey's doctoral thesis. Casey argued that critical judgement is objective because critical arguments are rational. They are rational due to considerations which, though they are not necessarily judgements of value, "criteriologically" imply them. For example, if a poem is sentimental "criteriologically" this implies that it is immature.
    ellauri053.html on line 537: Christopher Ricks wrote of this book, "provided this gets clearing from the philosophers, we shall at last have a compact, cogent and humane justification of criticism as a rational process." Paskanmarjat Casey oli niin konservatiivi katoliikki eze diggas jopa islamia. Ja lysytti muuteskin naisia.
    ellauri053.html on line 697: Herbert Spencer (27 April 1820 – 8 December 1903) was an English philosopher, biologist, anthropologist, and sociologist famous for his hypothesis of social Darwinism whereby superior physical force shapes history. Spencer originated the expression "survival of the fittest", which he coined in Principles of Biology (1864) after reading Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species. The term strongly suggests natural selection, yet Spencer saw evolution as extending into realms of sociology and ethics, so he also supported Lamarckism.
    ellauri053.html on line 699: Spencer developed an all-embracing conception of evolution as the progressive development of the physical world, biological organisms, the human mind, and human culture and societies. As a polymath, he contributed to a wide range of subjects, including ethics, religion, anthropology, economics, political theory, philosophy, literature, astronomy, biology, sociology, and psychology. During his lifetime he achieved tremendous authority, mainly in English-speaking academia. "The only other English philosopher to have achieved anything like such widespread popularity was Bertrand Russell, and that was in the 20th century." Spencer was "the single most famous European intellectual in the closing decades of the nineteenth century" but his influence declined sharply after 1900: "Who now reads Spencer?" asked Talcott Parsons in 1937.
    ellauri053.html on line 701: Herbert Spencer (1820​–1903) is typically, and by rights, considered a coarse social Darwinist. Herbert Spencer was an English philosopher, biologist, anthropologist, and sociologist known for his infamous theory of social Darwinism throughout contemporary history.
    ellauri053.html on line 715: His contributions to racist ideology are many. In his famed work Social Statics (1850), he argued that imperialism had served civilization by clearing the inferior races off the earth: "The forces which are working out the great scheme of perfect happiness, taking no account of incidental suffering, exterminate such sections of mankind as stand in their way. … Be he human or be he brute — the hindrance must be got rid of."
    ellauri053.html on line 736: Tagore was raised mostly by servants; his mother had died in his early childhood and his father travelled widely.
    ellauri053.html on line 738: After his upanayan (coming-of-age rite) at age eleven, Tagore and his father left Calcutta in February 1873 to tour India for several months, visiting his father's Santiniketan estate and Amritsar before reaching the Himalayan hill station of Dalhousie.
    ellauri053.html on line 787: Father set my mother to prepare an abridged version of the Ramayana , keeping to the original but leaving out all superfluous and irrelevant matter so that the main story could be read at a stretch. Father insisted that she should consult the original Sanskrit and not depend upon Bengali translations for preparing her text. This was difficult for Mother, but undaunted she read the Ramayana with the help of a Pandit, and only then did she start writing, but unfortunately the book was not finished before she died and the MS. of the portion she had written got lost. I remember with what avidity we used to read her MS.
    ellauri053.html on line 805: Rathi poika kirjoitti isästänsä lisää muisteluxia. Rathindarathista tuli maataloustieteen yliopiston rehtori ja maankuulu avionrikkuri. Auttoi iskää pehtoorina suvun mittaamattomilla tiluxilla. Ven. kuvassa vaimoineen Rampen viekossa.
    ellauri053.html on line 811: After his resignation from Visva-Bharati, Tagore planned to move to Dehradun. He wrote to Nirmalchandra demanding that Mira be "handed-over" to him; Nirmalchandra obliged and Mira and her son 2-year old Jayabrato accompanied Tagore to Dehradun. Before leaving, Tagore wrote to Pratima, "I am not going secretly. I have informed everyone that Mira is with me." Pratima replied that she "would be happy, if he remained happy".
    ellauri053.html on line 818: The Tagores belong to the Bandyopadhyaya group of Bengali Brahmins. The genealogy can be traced back to Daksha, one of the five Brahmins who were imported sometime in the 8th century from Kanauj to help in reviving orthodox Hinduism in Buddhist-ridden Bengal. The descendants of this Brahmin moved from one place to another until one Panchanan in 1690 settled down at Govindapur near Calcutta. The opportunities of making money in this flourishing mercantile town, the stronghold of the East India Company, finally attracted the family to Calcutta in the latter part of the eighteenth century and they built their homes at Pathuriaghata and Jorasanko.
    ellauri053.html on line 820: Prince Dwarkanath Tagore, my great-grandfather, was a romantic figure. Contemporary of Rammohan Roy, the Father of the Renaissance Movement of Bengal, he was closely associated with him in all his activities and rendered financial help when- ever required. The East India Company were by this time firmly established in Bengal and were rapidly building up their trade. Dwarkanath’s knowledge of English helped him to take advantage of the conditions prevailing under the Company’s rule and he was able at quite an early age not only to amass a fortune but also to gain high offices under the British. With Rammohan Roy he took a leading part in all the movements for the promotion of higher education and social welfare. There was hardly any institution founded during his life-time that did not owe its existence to the generous charity of Dwarkanath. He came to be known as Prince Dwarkanath in recognition of his benefactions. His business enterprises extended to fields unexplored by Indians in those days. He had a fleet of cargo boats for trading between India and England. To improve his business connections and gain further concessions from the Company, he himself went to England accompanied by his youngest son, Nagendranath. I have had occasion to read the diary kept by this grand-uncle of mine. It describes vividly and in very chaste English the social life Of the aristocracy of England in the early Victorian age as seen through the eyes of an Indian. There is also an interesting description of his adventurous journey across the country from Bombay to Calcutta at a time when India was in a very disturbed condition on the eve of the Sepoy Mutiny.
    ellauri053.html on line 824: Soon after landing in London Dwarkanath became a favourite of Queen Victoria and of the court circle. There are many amusing stories told about his exploits in England and France some of which I came to know from the letters written by his valet.
    ellauri053.html on line 826: It is believed that the important business which took the Prince to England was - to try to negotiate with the British government for an izara (permanent lease) of the provinces of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa in supersession of the East India Company. He was well received by Queen Victoria. But this ambitious project of his came to nothing on account of his sudden death under somewhat mysterious circumstances.
    ellauri053.html on line 833: Our house has had an interesting history. As I have already said, my forefathers migrated to Calcutta in the early days of the East India Company, and, having helped in the erection of Fort William, made enough money to construct a palatial building of their own at Jorasanko in the northern quarter of the town. Other gentry were attracted to this quarter which gradually became the most fashionable part of the city, with elegant houses vying with each other. It is a pity that most of these houses are being crowded out or demolished to make room for hideous modern mansions. The architecture of that period with high columned facades and a series of interior courtyards was not only dignified but most suited to the tropical climate.
    ellauri053.html on line 853: Our teacher of English was an Englishman of a rather interesting type. He was given a bungalow in the compound. There he lived with thousands of silk-worms in which he had become interested through Akshoy Kumar Maitra, the historian. On Sundays, discarding all clothes, Mr. Lawrence would wrap himself in old newspapers and lie amongst the caterpillars which delighted in crawling all over him. He was very fond of them and used to say they were his children.
    ellauri053.html on line 855: Yäk. Mikä pahinta, Rampe opetti izekin lapsiaan. Rahan lisäxi sillä ei ollut kuin aikaa. In English he would sometimes assign us passages from Amiel’s Journal , one of his favourite books.
    ellauri053.html on line 863: Jagadish Chandra Bose had a wonderful fund of interesting stories, some very amusing, of the many lands he had visited and personalities he had met. He could go on telling them for hours and days together, yet one would never get tired of listening to him for he could always make the most trivial facts interesting, and his humour was so refreshing. He could also laugh ; so few people can laugh well and at the proper time and place. I would greatly miss him when he went away and secretly I would take a vow to become a scientist like him when I grew up.
    ellauri053.html on line 877: As soon as he had finished a piece of writing. Father always got restless until he had an opportunity of reading it to a few friends. None of his literary friends was at Shelidah at the time, so off he must go to Calcutta.
    ellauri053.html on line 886: Being an unpractical idealist and underrating the doctrinaire mentality of his friends, he came back full of hope and proposed to my grandfather that a conference of all theists be called at Santiniketan.
    ellauri053.html on line 890: At the end of three months I was to be examined by the Maharshi himself to see whether I could recite correctly and with proper intonation his selections from the Upanishads , called Brahmo-dharma.
    ellauri053.html on line 892: My teacher, who had no illusions, regarding his pupil, trembled at the herculean task imposed upon him. However, the Maharshi’s word was law, and teacher and pupil set to work with such grim determination that at the end of the prescribed period my grandfather was greatly pleased to hear me recite the mantras so dear to him.
    ellauri053.html on line 896: The sacred thread ceremony, the Upanayan takes place when a Brahmin boy is considered to be or a fit age to be attached to a Guru (teacher) to begin his education. He is taught the Gayatri mantram which every Brahmin is expected to repeal morning and evening as the text for his contemplation of the Infinite and is given the sacred thread to wear as a symbol of his initiation as a Brahmin.
    ellauri053.html on line 898: In ancient times the boy had to leave his home and live with his Guru in a forest hermitage as a Brahmachari. Only after having lived a spartan life during years of rigid training was he allowed to go home and take up the duties of a householder.
    ellauri053.html on line 928: How-ever simple, the strain on Father’s resources to maintain the school must have been great. The institution had no income of its own besides the annual Rs. 1,800 drawn from the Santiniketan Trust. For several years students were not charged fees of any kind. They were given not only free education, but food and very often clothing as well. The whole burden had to be borne by Father, when his own private income was barely Rs. 200 a month. My mother had to sell nearly all her jewellery for the support of the school, before she died in 1902.
    ellauri053.html on line 930: But it would be wrong to emphasize only the dark side of the picture. We were essentially a happy lot and life was very rich and interesting in spite of our outward poverty. Whenever Father was present, he poured his soul into the institution and made it lively by singing songs which he never tired of com- posing, reciting his poems, telling stories from the Mahabharaia , playing indoor games with the boys, rehearsing plays, and even taking classes.
    ellauri053.html on line 934: Eri hienoa oli lomilla kun joku runoilijanplanttu siteeras ulkomuistista eteviä runoilijoita: a youth of twenty-one, he could recite for hours freely from Virgil, Dante, Goethe, Shakespeare or Kalidas, — his favourites being Browning and Rabindranath.
    ellauri053.html on line 942: Before we realised what had happened, Satish Roy had vanished into the storm. Afterwards a search-party found his battered and half-dead form lying under a tree near the Bhuvandanga village.
    ellauri053.html on line 944: Vähän siellä rivoiltiinkin poikain kesken. Puritaaniäijät työnsi persiljoita korviin. Ja näyteltiin hisbe">Kesäyön unelmaa:
    ellauri053.html on line 948: (played by SNOUT) In this same interlude it doth befall
    ellauri053.html on line 952: Through which the lovers, Pyramus and Thisbe,
    ellauri053.html on line 953: Did whisper often very secretly.
    ellauri053.html on line 954: This loam, this roughcast, and this stone doth show
    ellauri053.html on line 956: And this the cranny is, right and sinister,
    ellauri053.html on line 957: Through which the fearful lovers are to whisper.
    ellauri053.html on line 969: While Father was entirely absorbed in his educational experiment at Santiniketan, Mother fell ill and she had to be taken to Calcutta for treatment. Before the doctors gave up hope Mother had come to realize that she would not recover. The last time when I went to her bedside she could not speak but on seeing me, tears silently rolled down her cheeks.
    ellauri053.html on line 973: Father kept outwardly calm and went back to Santiniketan to his work there as though nothing had disturbed his mind, leaving us in the care of a distant aunt of my mother. But his feeling — the keen sense of separation and loneliness — poured into a series of poems afterwards published as Smaran (In Remembrance).
    ellauri053.html on line 977: These letters were published by me and my brother-in-law Nagendranath Gangulee in 1911 as Chhinna-Patra. Unfortunately Father had mercilessly run his pen through good portions of the letters.
    ellauri053.html on line 983: Unfortunately just when he was feeling satisfied with the progress that was being made another mishap occurred in the family that greatly disturbed Father’s mind. My grandfather, the Maharshi, died in Calcutta. Father had to go there as soon as he heard about his illness and remained a long time there after grandfather’s death to settle business affairs consequent on the passing away of the head of a big family like ours. After the death of the Maharshi the family broke up — the members no longer lived together as in a Hindu joint family. (100 hengen huushollissa.)
    ellauri053.html on line 989: Vicissitudes of life, pain or afflictions, however, never upset the equanimity of my father’s mind. Like his father, the Maharshi, he remained calm and his inward peace was not disturbed by any calamity however painful. Some superhuman sakti gave him the power to resist and rise above misfortunes of the most painful nature.
    ellauri053.html on line 991: Throughout all these years of the severest trial to him Father’s penis never had any rest. Even when he would be passing through very great distress editors never had to wait for the regular instalments from his penis.
    ellauri053.html on line 993: Only a perfect control of the emotions together with an irrepressible urge for creative expression could explain the continuous outpouring of his thoughts in poems, novels, short stories, essays and other writings irrespective of his surroundings or circumstances, mental or physical.
    ellauri053.html on line 1004: Did he never hear from his own mother stories of giants and fairies and princesses?
    ellauri053.html on line 1006: Often when he gets late for his bath you have to call him a hundred times.
    ellauri053.html on line 1007: You wait and keep his dishes warm for him, but he goes on writing and forgets.
    ellauri053.html on line 1010: If I make the slightest noise you say, "Don't you see that father's at his work?"
    ellauri053.html on line 1012: When I take up father's pen or pencil and write upon his book just as he does,-a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,
    ellauri053.html on line 1026: "I felt sure that some Being who comprehended me and my world was seeking his best expression in all my experiences, uniting them into an ever-widening individuality which is a spiritual work of art. To this Being I was responsible; for the creation in me is His as well as mine." He called this Being his Jivan devata (“The Lord of His Life”), a new conception of God as man’s intimate friend, lover, and beloved that was to play an important role in his subsequent work.
    ellauri053.html on line 1032: Gitanjali was written shortly after the deaths of Tagore’s wife, his two daughters, his youngest son, and his father. But as his son, Rathindranath, testified in On the Edges of Time, “he remained calm and his inward peace was not disturbed by any calamity however painful. Some superhuman sakti [force] gave him the power to resist and rise above misfortunes of the most painful nature.” Gitanjali was his inner search for peace and a reaffirmation of his faith in his Jivan devata.
    ellauri053.html on line 1039: Tagore dictated his last poem a few hours before his death on August 7, 1941. No, minä...
    ellauri053.html on line 1050: An iota of joy of this fresh spring morning
    ellauri053.html on line 1063: And touched the heart of this world
    ellauri053.html on line 1083: I send my tidings of joy of this spring.
    ellauri053.html on line 1156:

    From 1900, his poetry grew more physical and realistic. He largely renounced the transcendental beliefs of his youth, though he remained preoccupied with physical and spiritual masks, as well as with cyclical theories of life. In 1923, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature.


    ellauri053.html on line 1157:

    In 1997, his biographer R. F. Foster observed that Napoleon's dictum that to understand the man you have to know what was happening in the world when he was twenty "is manifestly true of W.B.Y."


    ellauri053.html on line 1164:

    Eliot quoted, in evidence, four short passages from The Cutting of an Agate, in which Yeats says that the poet must “be content to find his pleasure in all that is for ever passing away that it may come again, in the beauty of woman, in the fragile flowers of spring, in momentary heroic passion, in whatever is most fleeting, most impassioned, as it were, for its own perfection, most eager to return in its glory.” Tää on puhdasta Tandoorikanaa.


    ellauri053.html on line 1166:

    At this point in his review, Eliot moves toward thinking that to make sense of Yeats you have first to remember that he is an Irishman. He thought that to be an Irishman was to be deprived of wit. Mut sitä pitempi oli jästin hanging dick jäykkänä.


    ellauri053.html on line 1170: On 26 January 1877, the young poet entered the Godolphin school, which he attended for four years. He did not distinguish himself academically, and an early school report describes his performance as "only fair. Perhaps better in Latin than in any other subject. Very poor in spelling".
    ellauri053.html on line 1179: His complaint against Yeats was that Yeats’s “supernatural world” was “the wrong supernatural world”: It was not a world of spiritual significance, not a world of real Good and Evil, of holiness or sin, but a highly sophisticated lower mythology summoned, like a physician, to supply the fading pulse of poetry with some transient stimulant so that the dying patient may utter his last words.


    ellauri053.html on line 1182: Varmaan saatuaan jollain klupilla maistaa Jästin suklaamunaa Eliot käänsi kerrassaan kelkkansa 30-luvulla: “Mr. Yeats has been and is the greatest poet of his time.”


    ellauri053.html on line 1191: Eliot needed to put a considerable distance between himself and Yeats, each of whom could be regarded as a Symbolist, however differently they responded to French Symbolism as Arthur Symons expounded it in The Symbolist Movement in Literature. It is my understanding that Symons led Yeats through the early chapters, with Mallarmé as the main figure, and that Eliot made his own way quickly through the several chapters until he reached Laforgue, the poet he found most useful in his attempt to discover his own voice. Still, Eliot’s animosity is hard to explain.
    ellauri053.html on line 1249: Aestheticism: Walter Pater is the man behind ‘Art for Art’s sake’, which even Oscar Wilde advocated of, the glimpse of which can be found in their writings. He evaluates art and his writing is thus related to art on the basis of their moral and educational value.
    ellauri053.html on line 1251: Versatile Writer: He exhibited in his work breadth of talents and interests. His most renowned work falls into cultural theory; art history including painting, sculpture, and architecture. He wrote on the critics of the old and modern English Literature too. He even wrote lecture articles, short stories etc. William E. Buckler says that Pater “is still one of the half-dozen indispensable critics in English; from, say, 1880 to 1920, he was without equal.”
    ellauri053.html on line 1253: Freshness In His Works: A. C. Benson called Pater's style "absolutely distinctive and entirely new", suggesting that there was some peculiar newness in his works.
    ellauri053.html on line 1255: Depth In Work: Pater’s work is not subtle and superficial. There is a certain depth and richness in his work.
    ellauri053.html on line 1261: Though Walter Pater is no more with us, like Monty Python's proverbial parrot, he has still become immortal because of his writings.
    ellauri053.html on line 1274: By the dark webs, her nape caught in his bill, kelade av svarta simhud, hennes nacke nafsad av en näbb:
    ellauri053.html on line 1275: He holds her helpless breast upon his breast. en svan försöker nå hennes tuttar med det vita ankbröstet.
    ellauri053.html on line 1286: Did she put on his knowledge with his power Fel, det är Helen of Troy som menas den här gången.
    ellauri053.html on line 1293: A man awaits his end Mies odottelee loppua
    ellauri053.html on line 1297: A great man in his pride Suurmiekkonen, ylpeä,
    ellauri053.html on line 1357:
    See a problem on this page?

    ellauri053.html on line 1363: Yeats derided MacBride in letters and in poetry. He was horrified by Gonne's marriage, at losing his muse to another man; in addition, her conversion to Catholicism before marriage offended him; Yeats was Protestant/agnostic. He worried his muse would come under the influence of the priests and do their bidding.
    ellauri053.html on line 1364: Gonne's marriage to MacBride was a disaster. This pleased Yeats, as Gonne began to visit him in London.
    ellauri053.html on line 1367: Yeats's friendship with Gonne ended when in Paris in 1908, they finally consummated their relationship. "The long years of fidelity rewarded at last" was how another of his lovers described the event. (Bet it was Ezra Pound.) Yeats was less sentimental and later remarked that "the tragedy of sexual intercourse is the perpetual virginity of the soul." (Aika narsistinen penselmä.) The relationship did not develop into a new phase after their night together, and soon afterwards Gonne wrote to the poet indicating that despite the physical consummation, they could not continue as they had been. She recommended Yeats to concentrate on other men.
    ellauri053.html on line 1370: By 1916, Yeats was 51 years old and determined to marry and produce an heir. His rival John MacBride had been executed for his role in the 1916 Easter Rising, so Yeats hoped that his widow might remarry. His final proposal to Maud Gonne took place in mid-1916. Gonne's history of revolutionary political activism, as well as a series of personal catastrophes in the previous few years of her life—including chloroform addiction and her troubled marriage to MacBride—not to mention that she was 50—made her a potentially unsuitable wife; biographer R. F. Foster has observed that Yeats's last offer was motivated more by a sense of duty than by a genuine desire to marry her.
    ellauri053.html on line 1371: Yeats proposed in an indifferent manner, with conditions attached, and he both expected and hoped she would turn him down. According to Foster, "when he duly asked Maud to marry him and was duly refused, his thoughts shifted with surprising speed to her daughter." Iseult Gonne was Maud's second child with Lucien Millevoye, and at the time was twenty-one years old.
    ellauri053.html on line 1377: During the first years of marriage, they experimented with automatic writing; she contacted a variety of spirits and guides they called "Instructors" while in a trance. The spirits communicated a complex and esoteric system of philosophy and history, which the couple developed into an exposition using geometrical shapes: phases, cones, and gyres.[71] Yeats devoted much time to preparing this material for publication as A Vision (1925). In 1924, he wrote to his publisher T. Werner Laurie, admitting: "I dare say I delude myself in thinking this book my book of books".
    ellauri053.html on line 1379: In December 1923, Yeats was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, "for his always inspired poetry, which in a highly artistic form gives expression to the spirit of a whole nation". He was aware of the symbolic value of an Irish winner so soon after Ireland had gained independence, and sought to highlight the fact at each available opportunity. His reply to many of the letters of congratulations sent to him contained the words: "I consider that this honour has come to me less as an individual than as a representative of Irish literature, it is part of Europe's welcome to the Free State." Taas yxi tällänen taatatyyppinen poliittinen nobelisti.
    ellauri053.html on line 1381: The prize led to a significant increase in the sales of his books, as his publishers Macmillan sought to capitalise on the publicity. For the first time he had money, and he was able to repay not only his own debts but those of his father.
    ellauri053.html on line 1402: And hid his arse amid a crowd of other bygone stars.
    ellauri053.html on line 1424: Ronsard is concerned with himself; Yeats barely refers to himself at all (one man) and delivers a prayer of devotion to his beloved. No other poet I've read compares.

    ellauri053.html on line 1427: The greatest of the modern English language poets, Yeats had the ability (and still does) to move anybody to tears with his words. A wonderful poet a very talented and extraordinary man.

    ellauri053.html on line 1430: This poem is very famous in China. We first know Yeats by this wonderful poem, which contain a story of Yeats himself that move us so deeply. From this poem, we know what is the true love, we know how deeply love can be. This has been transferred into the famous poem of MUDAN, also been transferred into a popular song sung by SHUIMUNIANHUA, so we can see how arractive it was to us in China.

    ellauri053.html on line 1433: This poem still moves me immensely, thirty-four years after I first read it and carefully parted from my very first true love. A very touching poem so beautifully written. Timeless. Marvellous lines - so insightful.

    ellauri054.html on line 76: Comeniuksen aatteita hyödynsi eniten Suomessa Gezelius. Hänen toimintansa takia Comeniuksella on merkittävä sija suomalaisen kasvatuksen ja koulutuksen historiassa. Comeniuksella oli Suomessa myös kriitikkonsa. Turun akatemian kaunopuheisuuden professori Daniel Achrelius pilkkaisi Gezeliuksen comeniuslaista opinto-ohjelmaa vuosikaudet, eikä sietänyt pakanallisten kirjailijoiden syrjintää, joka tuli esille Comeniuksen teoksissa ja jota Gezeliuskin toteutti hiippakunnassaan.
    ellauri054.html on line 101: The exhibits of this small museum consist mainly of text and information-panels. I found it informative but it also was similar to reading a informative-book displayed on the museum walls. I missed some artwork or historical objects.
    ellauri054.html on line 140: Sit stoalaiset kikhernefarmari ja vanhis, jotka harrasti näitä "de sejase" muotoisia esseitä. No oli helleeneilläkin "peri tuo ja tää".
    ellauri054.html on line 159: But above all, beleeve it, the sweetest Canticle is Nunc dimittis, when a Man hath obtained worthy Ends and Expectations. Death hath this also, That it openeth the Gate to good Fame, and extinguished Envie. Vanha Simo sanoi nyt päästät palvelijasi lepoon, nähtyään vihdoin Jeesus-lapsen synagoogassa. Jouti kuolemaan. No siitä samoinkuin Pekonista tuli vainajana kuuluisa. Kyllä käy kateexi. Lisää pekonin lurjustelusta albumissa 223.
    ellauri054.html on line 169: Samanniminen irkku maalari Francis Bacon (28 October 1909 – 28 April 1992) ei käyttänyt hattua. Bacon did not begin to paint until his late twenties, having drifted in the late 1920s and early 1930s as an interior decorator, bon vivant, and gambler. Since his death, Bacon's reputation has grown steadily, and his work is among the most acclaimed, expensive and sought-after on the art market. Extinctus amabitur idem. Niistettynä rakastetaan tätäkin. Oikeassa oli nimiserkku!
    ellauri054.html on line 187: Riikonen even found his wife-to-be, Salme Marjatta, at the University. They both studied Latin and attended the same lectures. The couldn’t marry until 11.5 years after their first meeting, however, as H. K. Riikonen wanted to follow scholar Valentin Kiparsky’s advice to not marry until his dissertation was complete. "Saatuani väitöskirjani valmiixi aion palata mielirunoilijani Horatiuxen pariin." Julkaistuaan kirjeet Tarastin kanssa kirjana Eero ja Hannu (vai oliko se toisinpäin) se sanoi myhisten partaansa: "seuraavaxi aion julkaista rakkauskirjeeni."
    ellauri054.html on line 189: At his jubilee seminar, Riikonen's Turku-based colleague, Jukka Sihvonen, characterised him as a bibliophile and a manic hoarder of books. Riikonen says that he has never counted the exact number of books in his home, but he estimates that his is one of Helsinki's most extensive private libraries.
    ellauri054.html on line 193: Riikonen has also planned a book on the Aristotelian concept of temperance. He believes temperance can also be used to describe his own lifestyle. “I’m a calm, middle-of-the-road person. I have never veered toward the extreme, in good or bad.” Every day, Riikonen walks to his office in Topelia from his home in Etu-Töölö. “Last year, around the New Year, I lost my temper for the first time, as the electronic lock system in Topelia was broken and I couldn't get to my office during the weekend. The weekends are the best time to work, because it is very quiet,” says Riikonen.
    ellauri054.html on line 208: Carlyle ja Emerson esseili suurmiehistä. Wannabeet. Macaulay kolmantena hälläpyöränä.
    ellauri054.html on line 213: Matthew Arnold (24. joulukuuta 1822 Laleham, Middlesex – 15. huhtikuuta 1888 Liverpool) oli englantilainen viktoriaanisen ajan runoilija sekä yhteiskunta- ja kirjallisuuskriitikko. Arnold työskenteli koulutarkastajana. Ei se kuitenkaan ollut pedantti. Hän oli kuuluisan Rugby Schoolin rehtorin Thomas Arnoldin poika ja vähemmän kuuluisien Tom Arnoldin ja William Delafield Arnoldin, romaanikirjailijan veli. Wordsworthin kamuja. A voice poking fun in wilderness. Oliko sekin puun takaa huutelija? Caricature from Punch, 1881: "Admit that Homer sometimes nods, That poets do write trash, Our Bard has written "Balder Dead," And also Balder-dash". Tennysonin ja Browningin jälkeen viktoriaanisten runoilijoiden twit-kisan pronssimies. "It might be fairly urged that I have less poetical sentiment than Tennyson and less intellectual vigour and abundance than Browning; yet because I have perhaps more of a fusion of the two than either of them, and have more regularly applied that fusion to the main line of modern development, I am likely enough to have my turn as they have had theirs." Arnold got into his poetry what Tennyson and Browning scarcely needed (but absorbed anyway), the main march of mind of his time.
    ellauri054.html on line 286: Into his mind the turbid ebb and flow Sen mieleen ihmiselon kurjuuden
    ellauri054.html on line 289: Hearing it by this distant northern sea. Kun kuullaan se täällä pohjanmerellä.
    ellauri054.html on line 313: So there stood Matthew Arnold and this girl
    ellauri054.html on line 318: Well now, I knew this girl. It's true she had read
    ellauri054.html on line 322: The notion of what his whiskers would feel like
    ellauri054.html on line 333: And finger his watch-chain and seem to sweat a bit,
    ellauri054.html on line 382: Tyypillisesti esseen kirjoittaja on amatööri. Esseisti tyrmää lukijan rohkealla yleistyxellä viidennessä erässä, Hannu kertoo tohkeissaan. Kulttuuri on kovaa agonia. Se tapahtuu julkisella areenalla, jossa ihminen on primitiivisimmillään. Hiki ja veri lentää. HK Riikonen tuntee izensä ihan häräxi. Seppo sä olet oikea sonni! Machismo as sheer poetry. Mä en oikeestaan ymmärrä miten joku voi olla valtavan henkisen paineen alla julkisen mielipiteen takia. Kuka välittää?
    ellauri054.html on line 401: The expanding disparity of wealth and the increasing criminalization of those in poverty have culminated in the U.S. having the largest prison population "in the history of human civilization."
    ellauri054.html on line 407: Professor of Law at Columbia University Bernard Harcourt contends that neoliberalism holds the state as incompetent when it comes to economic regulation but proficient at policing and punishing, and that this paradox has resulted in the expansion of penal confinement.
    ellauri054.html on line 421: In the modern era, the United Kingdom was the first European country to use for-profit prisons. Wolds Prison opened as the first privately managed prison in the UK in 1992. This was enabled by the passage of the Criminal Justice Act 1991 which empowered the Home Secretary to contract out prison services to the private sector.
    ellauri054.html on line 423: The law needs to be structured in such a way that it allows a steady stream of new inmates. This ties back to that lobbying aspect: stricter laws mean more people in the system. More people in the system means more money for the prison. Many have argued that this is the entire reason that the war on drugs was started: another set of laws that could incarcerate thousands of people every single year.
    ellauri054.html on line 435: We may never produce a world with "Men like gods," but we can at least implant a business model that shall make each of us in truth and in fact his brother's keeper.
    ellauri054.html on line 481: Robert Browning believed spiritualism to be fraud, and proved one of Daniel Dunglas Home's most adamant critics. When Browning and his wife Elizabeth attended one of his séances on 23 July 1855, a spirit face materialized, which Home claimed was Browning's son who had died in infancy: Browning seized the "materialization" and discovered it to be Home's bare foot. To make the deception worse, Browning had never lost a son in infancy.
    ellauri054.html on line 527: Browning´s early career began promisingly, but collapsed. The long poems Pauline (1833) and Paracelsus (1835) received some acclaim, but in 1840 the difficult Sordello, which was seen as wilfully obscure, brought his poetry into disrepute. His reputation took more than a decade to recover, during which time he moved away from the Shelleyan forms of his early period and developed a more personal style.
    ellauri054.html on line 545: Kotona Goitossa Sordello vetelehtii vuoden ajan, ja huomaa että siitä on tullut - voi kauhistus - narsisti. No ei mitään, Sorello kuzutaan laulamaan leidi Palman häissä, jossa leidi Palma tunnustaa eze oikeesti rakastaakin Sordelloa eikä kreivi Rikua. (Takautuma päättyy.)
    ellauri054.html on line 565: In 1846 Browning married the older poet Elizabeth Barrett and went to live in Italy. By the time of her death in 1861 he had published the crucial collection Men and Women (1855). The collection Dramatis Personae (1864) and the book-length epic poem The Ring and the Book (1868-1869) followed, and made him a leading British poet. He continued to write prolifically, but his reputation today rests largely on the poetry he wrote in this middle period.
    ellauri054.html on line 567: When Browning died in 1889, he was regarded as a sage and philosopher-poet who through his writing had made contributions to Victorian social and political discourse. Unusually for a poet, societies for the study of his work formed while he was still alive. Such Browning Societies remained common in Britain and the United States until the early 20th century.
    ellauri055.html on line 38: In Greek mythology, Comus (Ancient Greek: Κῶμος) is the god of festivity, revels and nocturnal dalliances. He is a son and a cup-bearer of the god Dionysus. Comus represents anarchy and chaos. His mythology occurs in the later times of antiquity. During his festivals in Ancient Greece, men and women exchanged clothes. He was depicted as a young man on the point of unconsciousness from drink. He had a wreath of flowers on his head and carried a torch that was in the process of being dropped. Unlike the purely carnal Pan or purely intoxicated Dionysos, Comus was a god of excess.
    ellauri055.html on line 52: Son père, procureur, décède alors que Jean Bouchet est encore jeune. Ami de Rabelais, Jean Bouchet exerce la profession paternelle. Il compose un grand nombre d'ouvrages historiques ou de fantaisie en vers et en prose, qui sont encore recherchés des bibliographes au XIXe siècle. Selon Maurice Allem, « grand travailleur, bon bourgeois, père d'une nombreuse famille, Bouchet est volontiers moraliste et même sentencieux » ainsi dans cet envoi :
    ellauri055.html on line 62: Vitshi mikä narshishi. Sen vanha flamma rakashtaa sitä, sen ruttuinen pääkallonnäköinen vaimoräähkä rakashtaa sitä vielä kuolinvuoteella, ja se nauraa röhöttää vaan tyytyväisenä. Sinä olit hyvä ja minä paha, vaimo pannaan vielä sanomaan. Riippumaha antaa sille anteexi. Narshishlle mannaa. Rollella izellään ei vaimot pysyneet. Nil mirum. Nukahtaessa tuli mieleen sana haud mirum.
    ellauri055.html on line 76: In 1921, his close friend, the Austrian writer Stefan Zweig, published his biography (in English Romain Rolland: The Man and His Works). Zweig profoundly admired Rolland, whom he once described as "the moral consciousness of Europe" during the years of turmoil and War in Europe. Zweig wrote at length about his friendship with Rolland in his own autobiography (in English The World of Yesterday).
    ellauri055.html on line 78: Les deux hommes ont quinze ans de différence. Stefan Zweig s'intéresse aux lettres européennes et il a déjà traduit quelques œuvres d'auteurs anglais, français et belges. La découverte en 1907 des premiers volumes de Jean-Christophe sera décisive dans sa rencontre avec l'auteur. Il est séduit par la portée universelle de l’œuvre de Romain Rolland et plus encore par l’homme auquel il rend visite, pour la première fois en février 1911, dans son appartement du 162, boulevard du Montparnasse. Les deux hommes partagent un amour pour la musique, une même foi en l'humanité et le sentiment d'appartenir à une civilisation, une culture commune, dont Romain Rolland esquisse les contours dans « la chevauchée européenne de Jean-Christophe ». Les deux écrivains entretiendront une correspondance suivie et intense entre 1910 et 1940 : 945 lettres ont été retrouvées (509 de Stefan Zweig dont une centaine en allemand, et 436 pour Romain Rolland). Cette correspondance est d'une importance capitale pour l'histoire des intellectuels du début du XXe siècle.
    ellauri055.html on line 98: Victor Serge was appreciative of Rolland's interventions on his behalf but ultimately thoroughly disappointed by Rolland's refusal to break publicly with Stalin and the repressive Soviet regime. The entry for May 4, 1945, a few weeks after Rolland's death, in Serge's Notebooks: 1936-1947 notes acidly that "At age seventy the author of Jean-Christophe allowed himself to be covered with the blood spilled by a tyranny of which he was a faithful adulator."
    ellauri055.html on line 100: Rolle oli vannoutunut pasifisti, se peukutti jopa bahaismiä. Jo oli epeli. Pikiä ahistelee bahaiuskoinen naapuri. Ne lukee kirjoja lukupiirissä ja kexustelee niiden pohjalta.
    ellauri055.html on line 109: Il faut cependant noter que les décisions de la Maison Universelle de Justice, ainsi que les exégèses des écrits sacrés faites par ʿAbd-al-Bahāʾ et Shoghi Effendi, bénéficient d’une autorité s’imposant à tous les baha’is. Ce qui a conduit depuis les années 1980-1990 à ce que plusieurs intellectuels et universitaires, historiens ou sociologues, soient chassés de la communauté baha’ie pour leurs vues jugées divergentes sur des questions-clefs (l’exclusion des femmes de la Maison universelle de justice ; l’obligation de soumettre toute publication, même universitaire, à un comité de censure ; l’homosexualité ; un système électoral qui favorise les sortants ; l’interdiction de participer à un parti politique ou d’adhérer à une organisation comme Amnesty International, etc., et surtout le sujet central de l’infaillibilité des institutions).
    ellauri055.html on line 173: Vanhuxena Rolle kuvittelee vielä naurattavansa neitosia 2-mielisillä jutuilla. Älä unta nää. Vanha pukki. Vieläkö hörhistelyttää? Siemennys on pääasia, koiraan elämän tarkoitus. Sisään vaan vaikkei seisokkaan.
    ellauri055.html on line 180: Mitä vähemmän mulla on, sitä enemmän olen ize. Vanha narshishi. Mutta jos mulla on vähemmän ... ähä ... olen ize enemmän. Nojaa, ihminen on kunnon otus, kaikki sopii hänelle; hän sopeutuu kaikkeen. Ikävä kyllä on niin. Hengityssuojaimet on jo muotia.
    ellauri055.html on line 182: Ei kyl Kolja sentään on aika nahkee nahiseva narsishi. Kun sen vaimo teki kuolemaa se kilisti kamujen kanssa lasia: Kilistäkäämme laseja! Jumala rakastaa miestä, veikkoseni, kun ottaa häneltä vaimon, silloin kun hän ei enää tiedä, mitä naisella tekisi.
    ellauri055.html on line 188: Ize izeään. Vitshi mikä narshishi. Sen kärpännaamainen vanha flamma rakashtaa sitä, sen ruttuinen pääkallonnäköinen vaimoräähkä rakashtaa sitä vielä kuolinvuoteella, ja se ize nauraa röhöttää vaan tyytyväisenä. Sinä olit hyvä ja minä paha, vaimo pannaan vielä sanomaan. Riippumaha antaa sille anteexi. Narshishlle mannaa. Rollella izellään ei vaimot pysyneet. Nil mirum.
    ellauri055.html on line 192: Vitshi mikä narshishti. Kun se putoaa telineiltä se esittää kuollutta saadaxeen haukkujen sijaan sääliä. "Makasin liikkumatta, pää takakenossa, parta terävästi pystyssä sojottaen ja yritin näyttää komealta."
    ellauri055.html on line 213: Saint Fiacre's relics were preserved in his original shrine in the local church of the site of his hermitage, garden, oratory, and hospice, in present Saint-Fiacre, Seine-et-Marne, France, but later transferred in 1568 to their present shrine in Meaux Cathedral in Meaux, which is near Saint-Fiacre and in the same French department, because of fear that fanatical Calvinists endangered them. Saint Fiacre had a reputation for healing haemorrhoids, which were denominated "Saint Fiacre's figs" in the Middle Ages. Cardinal Richelieu venerated his relics hoping to be relieved of the infirmity.
    ellauri055.html on line 215: Saint Fiacre is the patron saint of the commune of Saint-Fiacre, Seine-et-Marne, France. He is the patron of growers of vegetables and medicinal plants, and gardeners in general, including ploughboys. His reputed aversion to women is believed to be the reason he is also considered the patron of victims of venereal disease. He is further the patron of victims of hemorrhoids and fistulas, taxi cab drivers, box makers, florists, hosiers, pewterers, tilemakers, and those suffering from infertility. Finally, he is commonly invoked to heal persons suffering from various infirmities, premised on his reputed skill with medicinal plants.
    ellauri055.html on line 217: To celebrate the Second Millennium, "Saint Fiachra's Garden" opened in 1999 at the Irish National Stud and Gardens, Tully, County Kildare, Ireland, his nation of birth.
    ellauri055.html on line 321: Entä korrelaatiot? Mun hypoteesi on, että tyypin kuuluisuus korreloi negatiivisesti sen mietelmän puutarhamaisuuteen, eli toisin sanoen julkkixilta huolitaan mitä paskaa vaan koska ne on kuuluisia. (Vrt. Candide.) Eli siis "asian vierestä" kategoriassa olis keskimäärin julkkixempia. Joo tää piti erinomaisesti paikkansa. Asian vierestä puhujat oli lähes poikkeuxetta teeveestä tuttuja tai edes historian merkkihahmoja.
    ellauri055.html on line 378: When I go into my garden with a spade, and dig a bed, I feel such an exhilaration and health that I discover that I have been defrauding myself all this time in letting others do for me what I should have done with my own hands.
    ellauri055.html on line 594: Handella on kumpuvaza ja sangen vaatimaton hauislihas. Sen porkkana on nahistunut ja tulokulma matala. Se on liikuttava. Sellanen lutunen nalle.
    ellauri055.html on line 760: Lauri vilkaisi Alexanterin kirkon kimaltelevaan ristiin. Sitten hänen päässään alkoi itsepäisesti soida sanat hissuxiin-kissuxiin, hissuxiin-kissuxiin... Hullunkurista. Mutta pappi oli eräänä sunnuntaina ihan tosissaan hokenut sellaista. Lauri oli kerran sattunut kirkkoon herran ehtoollista jaettaessa, ja silloin hän oli sen kuullut. Se oli hullunkurista. Vanhoja vaimoja oli ollut polvillaan alttarin edessä ja pappi oli tarjonnut heille juotavaa hedelmävadista. Papin hiljaiset toistuvat sanat Jeesuxen Kristuxen... oli kaiku ja ässien suhina muuttanut sanoixi: Hissuxiin-kissuxiin, hissuxiin-kissuxiin... Kummallista, aikuiset höpisivät usein pelkkiä mitättömyyxiä. Hissuxiin-kissuxiin, hissuxiin-kissuxiin...
    ellauri055.html on line 883: Kesken jääneet opinnot antoivat kuitenkin paljon vaikutteita Sillinpään myöhemmälle kirjalliselle tuotannolle. Sillinpään ajatteluun vaikuttivat Charles Darwin kehitysoppeineen sekä saksalaiset biologi ja filosofi Ernst Haeckel ja Nobel-kemisti Wilhelm Ostwald ja myös Leo Tolstoi ja Arvid Järnefelt. Heidän vaikutustaan oli Sillinpään biologinen determinismi ja periaatteellinen väkivallan ja sotien vastustaminen sekä usko siihen että luonnontieteet kehittyessään siirtäisivät tällaiset atavistiset ilmiöt historiaan. Myöhemmin Sillinpää tutustui myös saksalaiseen Oswald Spengleriin ja omaksui häneltä ajatuksen sivilisaatioiden ihmiselämää vastaavasta elinkaaresta. Naziainexiakin oli siis, mutta mäkitupalaisena se ei siihen hurahtanut.
    ellauri055.html on line 1117: Sotavalta tutki suomalais-ugrilaisia kieliä. Arvo Sotavalta oli G. J. Ramstedtin apulaisena tämän tutkimusmatkalla Mongoliaan 1912. Se oli Ramstedtin seitsemästä idänretkestä viimeinen. Matkalle lähdettiin keväällä 1912 matkustamalla junalla Pietariin ja sieltä edelleen Urgaan Pohjois-Mongoliaan. Sieltä lähdettiin kymmenen hevosen karavaanilla tutkimusmatkalle, joka ulottui aina Selengajoen varrella olevaan Baibalykiin asti. Matkan tarkoitus oli tutkia muinaisen Tyrk-kansan ja sitä seuranneiden uigurien historiaa sekä tutustua mongolien nykykieleen. Matkalaiset palasivat kotimaahan joulun alla 1912. Arvo Sotavalta toi matkalta muun muassa mongolien asusteita, jotka hän lahjoitti Kansallismuseoon.
    ellauri055.html on line 1214: Eero Järnefelt teki vuonna 1916 Helsingin yliopiston päärakennuksen juhlasaliin Aurora-seuraa esittäneen seinämaalauksen. Se oli yksi Albert Edelfeltin ja Järnefeltin toteuttamista kolmesta maalauksesta, jotka esittivät yliopiston historiaan liittyneitä aiheita. Kaikki juhlasalin maalaukset tuhoutuivat helmikuun 1944 suurpommituksissa. Edelfeltin maalaus on myöhemmin entisöity, mutta Järnefeltin maalauksia ei. Kai ne oli liian scheisseja.
    ellauri055.html on line 1312: Kala omaksui ranskalaisen uskonnonhistorioitsijan Ernest Renanin ajatusmaailman, jonka mukaan ”korkein elämänarvo on uskonto”, mutta ”uskonto ei, tarkkaan ottaen, ole tosi”.
    ellauri058.html on line 26:

    RAUHAA

    Setämiehis


    ellauri058.html on line 83: Astrid Lindgren does not shy away from describing the situation for African-Americans during that era. Her language is not always comfortable, at least not for this day, referring to blacks as “the coloured race,” “young negro girl,” and, embarrassingly, “darkies.” How much of this is just a rough translation, how much of it is accurate translation, how much was totally acceptable back then, how much did Lindgren want us to feel uncomfortable . . .? Yeah, things sucked back then (*cough*even more than they do now*cough*) for African-Americans, and it shouldn’t be comfortable to read about it.
    ellauri058.html on line 87: I discovered reading when I was much younger than the little me in this picture. As a child, my favorite authors included C.S. Lewis, Roald Dahl, Jill Paton Walsh, Gertrude Chandler Warner, Louisa May Alcott, and J.R.R. Tolkien. I am a long-distance hiker, trail advocate, full moon camper, and adopter of sad old cats. I live, play, and work in Two Harbors, Minnesota.
    ellauri058.html on line 97: The Thin Man is a 1934 American comedy-mystery directed by W. S. Van Dyke and based on the novel of the same name by Dashiell Hammett. The film stars William Powell and Myrna Loy as Nick and Nora Charles, a leisure-class couple who enjoy copious drinking and flirtatious banter. Nick is a retired police detective who left his very successful career when he married Nora, a wealthy heiress accustomed to high society. Their wire-haired fox terrier Asta was played by canine actor Skippy. In 1997, the film was added to the United States National Film Registry having been deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant."
    ellauri058.html on line 148: Tuhannet suomalaiset joutuvat pohtimaan, missä vaiheessa heidän on ize otettava vastuu ja päätettävä vanhempien päivät niiden puolesta. Lapsille tilanne on vaikea, surullinen ja sydäntä raastava. Isän tai äidin heikentyminen on muistutus myös siitä, että omakin elämä lähestyy loppuaan. Lisäxi vanhempien persoonallisuus voi muuttua, ja se voi tuntua ahistavalta. Niistä voi tulla vihaisia ja kauhu kaunaisiakin. Keski-ikäisten ei kuitenkaan pidä yxioikoisesti päättää vanhempien puolesta, vaan iäkkään ihmisen mielipidettä on ensin kuunneltava, ja vasta sitten heivataan. Pohdittava eri vaihtoehtoja, ja valittava niistä se mikä on mukavinta izelle. Senioreille onkin tarjolla monia asumismuotoja, kuten pienryhmäkoteja, tehostettua asumista, vanhainkoteja, laitoshoitoa, pakkohoitoa, kuritushuonetta, kovennettua, ja tietysti se tuttu laatikko.
    ellauri058.html on line 274: Useimmissa Hotakaisen romaaneissa ollaan arjessa, tavallisessa Suomessa. Hän kuvaa kirjoissaan maaseutua tai lähiöelämää sekä ruumiillista työtä tekeviä ihmisiä. Syntisäkki (1995), Klassikko (1997) ja Iisakin kirkko (2004) ovat kaikki kuvauksia suomalaisista miehistä. Hotakaisen varsinainen läpimurtoteos oli osin omaelämäkerrallinen Klassikko, joka oli vuonna 1997 Finlandia-palkintoehdokas. Siitä tehtiin myös elokuva vuonna 2001. Vuonna 1997 Hotakaisen lastenkirja Ritva oli Finlandia Junior -palkintoehdokas. Vuonna 2000 ilmestyi nuortenkirja Näytän hyvältä ilman paitaa, joka on tarinakokonaisuus helsinkiläisistä nuorista ja heidän elämästään. Kirja sai ilmestymisvuonnaan Topelius-palkinnon.
    ellauri058.html on line 324: Helenan naisnäkökulmat on aivan vitun täynnä setänarsismia ettei voi uskoa. Ja sit tät ziljoonasta akenttitarinasta tuttua varustelua ja treeniä. Anaalis-obsessiivien peitonalusnamua. Sivistymättömiä kielivirheitä. Juoxiessa. Olivat aina auttanut minua. Pariisin Gard du Nordin rautatieasema. Säälittävää izesääliä kotirintamamiehistä. Puhasta puppua. Ja ilotonta epähauskaa vizinvääntöä omakotiasukeista Ilmari Pimiän kustannuxella, joka oli Olavi Homopaavilaisen lapsuudentoveri. Imi P. Imijä oli karjalaisrunoilija ja piirustuxen ope. Kieriskeli Olkkarin kanssa saunassa ja sen jälkeen lumessa. Liha liikkuu siellä ja kutaa on, häntä koipien välissä tuuhettuu.
    ellauri058.html on line 331: Karilla on tollanen väkivaltaisen miehen Anders-tyylinen crew cut. Mutta se on sanka-rillinen. Epäilemättä se oikeestikkin pönkittää uhanalaista miehisyyttään juoxulenkeillä ja penkkiurheilulla. Karin crew cut frisyyri viittaa punk-menneisyyteen. Ja tää kohta on varmasti ize eletty varhaiskeski-ikäisen kaljuuntuvan narsistikirjailijan tunnustus:
    ellauri058.html on line 370: Fanaattisesta ruohonleikkuusta olen Karin kanssa kyllä samoilla linjoilla. Ja jalkaväenkenraali Ehrnroothista: korisevalla äänellä puhuvaa jalkaväenkenraalia kuunneltiin kuin suonsilmäkkeestä nostettua meediota, kaikki mitä hän sanoi vertautui jumalansanaan. Mixi tuota vähäjärkiseltä vaikuttavaa ärrävikaista kenraalia kuskattiin kuzuilta toiselle kuin paavia. E.Saarinen lähti tohon mukaan täysillä. Oxettavaa. Ämpäri!
    ellauri058.html on line 462: Ihan jännittää kuulla, mitä tämä porukka on mieltä kotirintamamiehistä. Oliko Kari-Matti oikealla asialla vaiko eikö? Ize Kari panee jopa naispoliisi Maritan peukuttamaan nyhjäkettä. Nyhjäkkeeltä oli opinnot jääneet kesken niinkuin Karilta. Se oli psykopaatti niinkuin nähtävästi Karikin.
    ellauri058.html on line 537: Monet historioitsijat ovat käyttäneet Päätalon teoksia lähteinään tutkiessaan Koillismaan yhteiskunnallisia oloja 1900-luvun alkuvuosikymmenillä, koska seudun elämästä ei ollut ennen Päätaloa – lukuun ottamatta vero- ja käräjäpöytäkirjoja – kirjoitettu juuri mitään. Ylläri. Päätalon jälkeenkään siitä tuskin kirjoitetaan juuri mitään.
    ellauri058.html on line 557: Komppania K:n suomennoxen sotatermeistä Karonen löytää virheitä, hänen mukaansa esimerkiksi 'automaattikivääreitä' ei käytetty ensimmäisessä maailmansodassa. Suomentaja Janne Tarmio toteaa vastineessaan Karoselle, että hän valitsi käännökseen termin "automaattikivääri" lähdeaineistoon tukeutuen. Amerikkalaisilla oli sitä paitsi ensimmäisessä maailmansodassa käytössä MI918 BAR, jonka luontevin vastine historiallisissa yhteyksissä on hänen mukaansa juuri automaattikivääri.
    ellauri058.html on line 593: Timonen tähdentää ”nykynaisen näkökulmaa” yhä uudestaan, vaikka toisaalta ”historian naisia on hyvä tarkastella omassa kontekstissaan”. Tahallaan kai hän tarjoilee naisille ”selviytymisstrategiaa”, ”resilienssiä” ja ”camp-tyyliä”. Hän kysyy Ruijassa 1860-luvulla eläneeltä Lahti-Vapulta: ”Oliko siellä myös vilkasta sosiaalista elämää ja seurustelua?”
    ellauri058.html on line 605: Syksyllä 2013 saatiin Helsingin Sanomissa seurata Matti Salmisen ja Vesa Karosen kiivasta sanailua liittyen Pentti Haanpäähän. Salminen oli juuri julkaissut Haanpäästä uuden elämäkerran, jossa hän omien sanojensa mukaan kääntää nurin koko kirjailijan “virallisen” historian. Itsetietoinen tyyli ei saanut pitkän linjan Haanpää-tutkija Karosta syttymään (Vesa Karonen: Reportaasi Pentti Haanpäästä jättää teokset sivuosaan, HS, 15.9.2013).
    ellauri058.html on line 714: The ancient texts describe the symptoms Herod experienced in his final days: painful intestinal problems, convulsions in every limb, intense itching, breathlessness, and gangrene of the genitalia. Josephus wrote that Herod’s final illness―sometimes called “Herod’s Evil"―was excruciating.
    ellauri058.html on line 716: It has generally been thought that King Herod died at 69 years of age from complications of gonorrhea. Dr. Jan Hirschmann, a physician at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle, decided to explore further, and presented his diagnosis at the Historical Clinical Pathologic Conference (CPC).
    ellauri058.html on line 722: Hirschmann presented his research at the Clinical Pathologic Conference in Baltimore, US. Since 1995, the annual conference has examined the cause of death of famous figures, including Alexander the Great (typhoid fever from a contaminated pork chop) and Edgar Allen Poe (rabies).
    ellauri058.html on line 746: Kolokvintti (kreik. kolokynthis, katkera kurkku) on kurkkukasveihin kuuluva Citrullus colocynthis -kasvilaji ja sen kuivattu hedelmä.
    ellauri058.html on line 777: The poet first came out as gay in his 1975 work In & Out, which was initially available only in a privately printed version in limited circulation. The work did not gain general publication until 1989.
    ellauri058.html on line 779: Following the death of his partner of more than 30 years, the philosopher Samuel Todes, Hine lived in semi-retirement in Evanston, Illinois. Hine died of complications of a blood disorder on August 20, 2012 at the age of 76. Varmaan AIDS. Pueriilit runot on kuiteskin omistettu "for Jerry". Hmm. Ezellanen Jami.
    ellauri058.html on line 783: Desire is like a hurricane. Accept
    This loving mariner into your port.
    ellauri058.html on line 799: The twelfth book of The Greek Anthology compiled at the court of Hadrian in the second century a.d. by a poetaster Straton, who like most anthologists included an immodest number of his own poems, is itself a part of a larger collection of short poems dating from the dawn of Greek lyric poetry (Alcaeus) down to its last florescence, which survived two Byzantine recensions to end up in a single manuscript in the library of the Count Palatine in Heidelberg — hence its alternative title, The Palatine Anthology, usually abbreviated to Anth. Pal. This particular, indeed special, collection contained in Book XII subtitled The Musa Paedika or Musa Puerilis, alternately from the Greek word for a child of either sex — and girls are not wholly absent from these pages — or the Latin for “boy,” consists of 258 epigrams on various aspects of Boy Love or, to recur to the Greek root, paederasty.
    ellauri058.html on line 806: Aika setämiesmäistä historian yxinkertaistusta. Daryliltä jää jengimuodostelmista mainizematta juna. Ei sunkaan Heidelbergin Pfalzgraf-setäkin ollut melamiehiä? Onnekshi she ei ole perlbriytynyt, mulle siis. Entä Tatu, olixnää homoepigrammit sen lemppareita?
    ellauri058.html on line 810: 1. I wish to let the reader know that I myself am sexually conservative: I am married, faithful to my wife, and a father. In this review I plead …castum esse decet pium poetam / ipsum. uersiculos nihil necesse est, qui tum denique habent salem ac leporem , si sunt molliculi ac parum pudici. Tää on Catulluxen runosta 16 joka alkaa Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo. Teivas Oxalan unohtumattomana käännöxenä Suuhun myös peräpäähän teitä tökkään. Siellä sanotaan: Hartaan näät runoniekan siivo olla kuuluu, voi toki värsyt olla toisin; silloin niissä on sukkeluutta, suolaa, pehmeet jos ovat eikä liian siivot. Kovia munia ja pehmoisia värssyjä. Vanhana on pikemminkin toisin päin.
    ellauri058.html on line 919: No jos Tatuun palataan niin se oli kyllä kiinnostunut kauniista miehistä.
    ellauri058.html on line 966: Meung-sur-Loire: In fiction, it has been described by Alexandre Dumas in The Three Musketeers as the village where d'Artagnan, en route to join the King's Musketeers in Paris, first encounters the villainous Comte de Rochefort. Also in fiction, Meung-sur-Loire is the country home of Chief Inspector Jules Maigret, Georges Simenon's classic crime fiction character. Maigret and his wife Louise eventually retire to their Meung-sur-Loire home, where he spends his time fishing (pike), and she tends, according to her sister, any number of animals.
    ellauri060.html on line 112: The result of his Yale fellowship was Notes for a New Culture, written when Ackroyd was only 22 and eventually published in 1976. The title, an echo of T. S. Eliot's Notes Towards the Definition of Culture (1948), was an early indication of Ackroyd's penchant for exploring and re-examining the bollocks of other London-based writers.
    ellauri060.html on line 176: Vanhuudesta Ritu on samaa miältä michelinin kanssa: se oisi kiellettävä. Bumzibumin isoäiti opiskelee konsthistuuriaa vaikka on ikivanha, 72 vee. Ritu on nyt saman ikäinen.
    ellauri060.html on line 217: - Iida Leikkari! Sinä taas nimes perusteella olisit saattanut rähistä lääninmestaajan muijana. (..)

    ellauri060.html on line 231: Daniel Defoe (/dɪˈfoʊ/; born Daniel Foe; c. 1660 – 24 April 1731) was an English writer, trader, journalist, pamphleteer and spy. He is most famous for his bestselling novel Robinson Crusoe, published in 1719, which is claimed to be second only to the Bible in its number of translations. He has been seen as one of the earliest proponents of the English novel, and helped to popularise the form in Britain with others such as Aphra Behn and Samuel Richardson. Defoe wrote many political tracts, was often in trouble with the authorities, and spent a period in prison for unpaid debts. Laissez faire intellectuals and political leaders paid attention to his fresh ideas and sometimes consulted him.
    ellauri060.html on line 235: Daniel Foe was probably born in Fore Street in the parish of St Giles Cripplegate, London. His father, James Foe, was a prosperous tallow chandler of Flemish descent, and a member of the Worshipful Company of Butchers. In Defoe's early childhood, he experienced some of the most unusual occurrences in English history: in 1665, 70,000 were killed by the Great Plague of London, and the next year, the Great Fire of London left only Defoe and two other guys standing in his neighbourhood. In 1667, when he was probably about seven, a Dutch fleet sailed up the Medway via the River Thames and attacked the town of Chatham in the raid on the Medway. His mother, Alice, had died by the time he was about ten.
    ellauri060.html on line 237: Defoe later added the aristocratic-sounding "De" to his name, and on occasion made the bogus claim of descent from the family of De Beau Faux. His birthdate and birthplace are uncertain, and sources offer dates from 1659 to 1662, with the summer or early autumn of 1660 considered the most likely.
    ellauri060.html on line 239: His parents were Presbyterian dissenters, and around the age of 14, he was sent to Charles Morton's dissenting academy at Newington Green, then a village just north of London, where he is believed to have attended the Dissenting church there after getting his Bachelor of Dissenting.
    ellauri060.html on line 241: Defoe entered the world of business as a general merchant, dealing at different times in hosiery, general woollen goods, and wine. His ambitions were great and he was able to buy a country estate and a ship (as well as civets to make perfume), though he was rarely out of debt. On 1 January 1684, Defoe married Mary Tuffley at St Botolph's Aldgate. She was the daughter of a London merchant, receiving a dowry of £3,700—a huge amount by the standards of the day. With his debts and political difficulties, the marriage may have been troubled, but it lasted 47 years and produced eight children.
    ellauri060.html on line 245: Following his release from debtors’ prison, he probably travelled in Europe and Scotland, and it may have been at this time that he traded wine to Cadiz, Porto and Lisbon. By 1695, he was back in England, now formally using the name "Defoe" and serving as a "commissioner of the glass duty", responsible for collecting taxes on bottles. In 1696, he ran a tile and brick factory in what is now Tilbury in Essex and lived in the parish of Chadwell St Mary. He was a serial entrepreneur.
    ellauri060.html on line 276: - Seminaarissa on kaksi johtolankaa: teemaksi tuli Elmo, mutta myös muu tuotanto. Nyt tuodaan esiin Juhanin moninaisuus, hän on suurempi kuin Elmo itse, kertoo Tuula Nurmen aviomies, seuran varapuheenjohtaja Risto Nurmi. (Taitaisi runkkujussi olla vihainen jos tietäisi, että vaimo elää sen kanssa iloisena leskenä! Tai ehkä se jo tiesikin, kun kirjotti sitä iloisinta surua. Se Inter-Toran mies oli takuulla Risto. Runkkujussin seuran eka puhis oli Sorsan Kalevi. Alaspäin on kyllä menty vuotten saatossa. Mitäs Timppa sanoikaan miesmuistin lyhyydestä? Astu lähemmäxi, se on lyhyempi kuin luuletkaan.)
    ellauri060.html on line 304: Elämän oljenkorret ovat vähissä. Yksi niistä on hänen poikansa Aleksi, toinen inttikaveri Eljas Hokkala, joka perustaa metsästysseuran johon Sauli liittyy sekä kolmas on viehättävä hongankolistaja Maisa Patén, johon hän tutustui tämän isän hautajaisissa. Ja sit on ne kaikki onnellisissa avioliitoissa elävät "ihanat ihmiset" jotka marssitetaann esille ihan lopussa. Ravihevoskouluttajat, feikkitaiteilija, kyläkauppias, mitä niitä olikaan.
    ellauri060.html on line 442: Esa Saarinen on etc. Munaton Jörkka-vainaa on etc. Esa ja Mauri Sariola eivät ole. No Mauri luki lakia ja Esa psykaa, joka kyllä kuului sillon historiallis-kielitieteelliseen osastoon. Epäyllättävän paljon on turhia puolijulkkixia ja hämäriä slavisteja. Turhilla puolijulkkixilla on parasta ennen päivä, joka Esukan ja Maurin kohdalla on jo mennyt. Nilkin kohdalla se on jo huulilla. Mutta se on tuskin edes nelosdivaria.
    ellauri060.html on line 470: This song may be of quite recent origin, since almost half of the known examples are sound recordings, and there's only one broadside printing. On the other hand, there's an older and widely printed broadside Jimmy and his True Love, which might well be an earlier version—or it may just be a song with universal appeal and a good chorus that people still enjoy singing. Of the 40 or so instances in Roud, most are from the south west of England or East Anglia—though Gavin Greig collected a dozen examples in Scotland in the early years of last century. No other Sussex version has been collected.
    ellauri060.html on line 472: As the song is traditional and the lyrics vary greatly from singer to singer, linking to 'original lyrics' for this song is impossible.
    ellauri060.html on line 486: Now a sailor and his true love were a-walking one day.
    ellauri060.html on line 487: Said the sailor to his true love, “I am bound far away.
    ellauri060.html on line 498: Saying, “Take this, dearest William, and my heart will go too.”
    ellauri060.html on line 914: Rob Anybody turned to his brother and said, Ye will mind, brother o mine, that there was time ye should stick your head up a duck's bottom rather than talk?
    ellauri060.html on line 916: Daft Wullie looked down at his feet. 'Sorry, Rob. couldnae find a duck the noo.'
    ellauri060.html on line 928: The first official slogan of the Libertarian Party was "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch" (abbreviated "TANSTAAFL"), a phrase popularized by Robert A. Heinlein in his 1966 novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, sometimes dubbed "a manifesto for a libertarian revolution". The current slogan of the party is "The Party of Principal and Dividends".
    ellauri060.html on line 936: Last month, Sheila McNallen posted that her husband, Steve, had been kicked off of Facebook, “apparently forever.” Steve is the founder of the Ásatrú Folk Assembly, a group headquartered in California that advocates for a return to Germanic Paganism, including an espousal of what they have deemed traditional, Nordic white values. The Asatru Folk Assembly has been classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, and in one YouTube video with more than 30,000 views, McNallen enumerates his theories on race, point by point, including his belief that racial differences are inherent to biology and his desire to defend the white race against “numerous threats to our future.” “I will fight for my race, primarily with words and ideas, but I will fight more literally if I have to,” he vows.
    ellauri060.html on line 938: 36 Facebook users sympathized with the McNallens’ plight, grousing over Facebook’s recent crackdown on white supremacists and sharing various platforms that would be more receptive to people who share his views. “Please look at MeWe,” one user wrote. “Many are heading over there.”
    ellauri060.html on line 947: A lot of people agree with McNallen, even those who don’t necessarily share his extremist views — and many of them are heading over to MeWe.
    ellauri060.html on line 951: An MBA graduate from the UCLA School of Management, Weinstein launched his first venture, SuperGroups (which included SuperFamily and SuperFriends), in 1998, allowing users to create free, multi-member community website; that venture, a sort of precursor to Facebook groups shut down in 2001. He then developed a professional coaching and training service, publishing a series of self-help books under the “Habitually Great” brand.
    ellauri060.html on line 955: After Silverfish lost his face at alt-right, another hooknosed greedy Shylock cobbled together MeWe, a social networking app that claimed to fiercely protect user privacy. The genesis of the name, says Weinstein, is exactly what it sounds like: “My life is composed of me and then my ‘we'. Me and my wee 'thing' love our name. We get a lot of thumbs up on our brand: Make America Habitually Great."
    ellauri060.html on line 1027: Eretismi (< m.kreik. ἐρέθισμα, erethisma, 'kiihotus', 'ärsytys') tarkoittaa liikakiihottumista, taudillisesti korostunutta kiihottuvaisuutta. Se on tila, jossa vähimmätkin, terveessä tilassa tehottomat kiihottimet saavat aikaan tuntuvia vaikutuksia. Se on lääketieteen historiassa luokiteltu erityiseksi lajiksi heikkohermoisuutta.
    ellauri060.html on line 1044: But what good are those pages if the supply of NEWLY created and added pages is shrinking, with fewer and fewer good links? This decline is very bad, as it gets harder and harder to constantly surface good stuff among the FRESHEST supply of indexed content.
    ellauri060.html on line 1046: This content quality problem has been exacerbated by Google’s switch to emphasize the freshness of their index years ago. The rationale was that there was so much good stuff around, and that its supply was (supposedly even exponentially) constantly increasing so Google would always be able to show amazing results just from the freshest portion of their index.
    ellauri060.html on line 1085: Runkkujussi kaipaa miehisten miesten seuraan kokolle kuin Surku Yniäinen. Mutta ei! Runkkujussin Jorma-isä ei ollut kuuluisa jääkiekkoilija (kuten ei Jussikaan), vaan teollisuusvirkailija, mitä sellainen nyt tekeekään. Varmaan ei ainakaan rutistanut runkkujussia sylkyssä. Jussi puhuu Karpokratesista, vaikka pitäis puhua Karpokrateesta. Puolisivistynyt jussi-pussi, puun takaa nussija.
    ellauri060.html on line 1095: Sauli Rekelä kaatui ja katkaisi nilkkansa pimeässä omatekoisen isä-poika leirin karkuretkellä. Isä huutaa Ilm- Alexia auttamaan. Koko revohka Tuulan kaa jää aivan auki. Eikä selviä kenen piti vahtia Karoliina vainajaa. Runkkujussin takuulla. Koko juttu on elokuvallisesti enää historiallinen kuriositeetti, tuumii Ilta-Pulun Jyrki Laelma.
    ellauri060.html on line 1158: The phrase was adopted by US Army General "Vinegar" Joe Stilwell as his motto during the war, in the form Illegitimati non carborundum. It was later further popularized in the US by 1964 presidential candidate Barry Goldwater.
    ellauri060.html on line 1162: The phrase is also used as the first line of one of the extra cod Latin verses added in 1953 to an unofficial school song at Harvard University, "Ten Thousand Men of Harvard". This most frequently played fight song of the Harvard University Band is, to some extent, a parody of more solemn school songs like "Fair Harvard thy Sons to your Jubilee Throng". (voi helvetti, tää oli tosi paha.) The first verse is a nonsense sequence of Latin clichés:
    ellauri060.html on line 1207: Lehden kansi on poikkeuksellinen, sillä Vogueta myydään nyt ensi kertaa miehellä. Harvalukuiset miehet ovat poseeranneet aiemmin Voguen kannessa vain naisten seurassa. Lähes 130-vuotiaan naisten muotilehden historiassa kyse on rohkeasta vedosta.
    ellauri060.html on line 1211: Naisten muotilehden "kansikuvapoika" on aiheuttanut närää Yhdysvaltain konservatiivipiireissä. Hätähuutoja miehisten miesten puolesta on lähettänyt muun muassa amerikkalainen, konservatiiviseksi provokaattoriksi profiloitunut "aktivisti" Candace Owens:
    ellauri060.html on line 1213: There is no society that can survive without strong men. The East knows this. In the west, the steady feminization of our men at the same time that Marxism is being taught to our children is not a coincidence.
    ellauri060.html on line 1224:
    So this is our idea of a man?

    ellauri061.html on line 177: Sisemmän maatuskan aiheena on Pyramos ja Thisbe, jotka on jo mainittu hisbe">parikin hisbe">kertaa edellä. Nää piparminttupirtelön farssit on kyllä vahvoja meemejä. Vaik luultavasti lähinnä sixi ettei ollut nettiä.
    ellauri061.html on line 195: The next critic known to comment on the play was John Dryden, writing in 1677. He was preoccupied with the question of whether fairies should be depicted in theatrical plays, since they did not exist. He concluded that poets should be allowed to depict things which do not exist but derive from popular belief. And fairies are of this sort, as are pigmies and the extraordinary effects of magic. Based on this reasoning, Dryden defended the merits of three fantasy plays: A Midsummer Night's Dream, The Tempest, and Ben Jonson's Masque of Witches. Varmaan se olis pitänyt Kiekkomaailmastakin ja Valtaistuinpelistä. Ja Harry Potterista.
    ellauri061.html on line 197: Francis Gentleman was much less appreciative of this play. He felt that its major weaknesses were a "puerile" plot and that it consists of an odd mixture of incidents. The connection of the incidents to each other seemed rather forced to Gentleman. Sama vika vaivaa Jari Pervoa, Rovaniemen Shakespearea (ks alempana).
    ellauri061.html on line 199: Edmond Malone, a Shakespearean scholar and critic of the late 18th century, found another flaw in this particular play, its lack of a proper decorum. He found that the "more exalted characters" (the aristocrats of Athens) are subservient to the interests of those beneath them. In other words, the lower-class characters play larger roles than their betters and overshadow them. He found this to be a grave error of the writer. Tääkin muistuttaa Nuorgamin runoilijasta (ks alempana).
    ellauri061.html on line 201: August Wilhelm Schlegel työnsi myös lusikkansa soppaan. Schlegel perceived unity in the multiple plot lines. He noted that the donkey's head is not a random transformation, but reflects Bottom's true nature. Eli se oli oikeasti oikea aasi. Ovelaa. Hyvin ajateltu Robin! He identified the tale of Pyramus and Thisbe as a burlesque of the Athenian lovers.
    ellauri061.html on line 205: Samuel Taylor Coleridge felt that Helena is guilty of "ungrateful treachery" to Hermia. He thought that this was a reflection of the lack of principles in women, who are more likely to follow their own passions and inclinations than men. Women, in his view, feel less abhorrence for moral evil, though they are concerned with its outward consequences. Coleridge was probably the earliest critic to introduce gender issues to the analysis of this play. Kehler dismisses his views on Helena as indications of Coleridge's own misogyny, rather than genuine reflections of Helena's morality.
    ellauri061.html on line 209: In 1839, the philosopher Hermann Ulrici wrote that the play and its depiction of human life reflected the views of Platonism. In his view, Shakespeare implied that human life is nothing but a dream,
    ellauri061.html on line 235: 3. tuotantokausi. Taas nää pienyrittäjä-ääliöt. Ne harjottelee Pyramosta ja Thisbeetä. Thisbee, kuin kukan haisu ihanainen. Haju! Haju! Puck mulkkaa Perseelle aasinpään. Kaikki säikähtävät. Sinä olet vallan mulkattu! Ja sit tulee vallan hullunkurinen käänne: Titania herää ja rakastuu oitis Perseeseen! Kato kun sen silmässä oli sitä taikavoidetta! LOL! Uskomatonta että asialliset setämiehet on kexineet tähän sen seizemättä syvällistä taka-ajatusta. Takuulla Pirtelö veti tän vaan aivan hanurista.
    ellauri061.html on line 239: Pyramos ja Thisbe on babylonialainen tarina Pyramos-nuorukaisesta ja hänen lemmitystään Thisbestä. Roomalainen kirjailija Ovidius on kirjoittanut sen Muodonmuutoksia-teokseensa.
    ellauri061.html on line 241: Pyramuxen and Thisbeen välikohtaus menee Ovidiuxen mukaan näin. Partnerit on tehneet appointmentin Babylonin muurilla. Thisbe tulee ensixi, mutta pelästyy jellonaa, ja pudottaa vahingossa huivinsa kuin Helmi Glasgowin lentokentän vessaan. Saablari! Se oli kallis huivi, ja tota väriä ei enää saa. Pyramus tulee myöhässä ja löytää Thisben huivin verisenä, ja typeränä hätäheikkinä kaatuu omaan miekkaansa. Thisbe tulee vessasta ja löytää Pyramuxen verissään, ja kompastuu hädissään samaan aseeseen. Tämän muistoxi mulperimarja muuttuu punaisesta mustaxi.
    ellauri061.html on line 265: No ize asiassa on myönnettävä että tää Pyramos ja Thisbe näytelmä on suunnilleen parasta mitä tiaatteri voi tarjota. Kaiken muun ois voinut jättää vaikka pois. Ei tää suorastaan naurattanut tääkään, muttei sentään suututtanutkaan. Kohteliaisuuden ja järjestyksen tähden täytyy meidän kestää loppuun asti. Toivon
    ellauri061.html on line 312: stands the man; good; if the man go to this water, tähän veteen, ja hukuttautuu, eli tahtoi eli ei, menee; -- huom!
    ellauri061.html on line 316: that is not guilty of his own death shortens not his own life.
    ellauri061.html on line 317: Second Clown But is this law? Spede 2 Mut tääkö on laki?
    ellauri061.html on line 319: Second Clown Will you ha' the truth on't? If this had not been Spede 2 Tiezä mitä? Jos tää ei ois ollut aatelinen, se olis haudattu
    ellauri061.html on line 323: great folk should have countenance in this world to isokenkäisillä on lärvää hukuttaa tai hirttää izensä, enemmän kuin
    ellauri061.html on line 354: ass will not mend his pace with beating; and, when vaikka läimit sitä; ja kun sulta enskerran kysytään tätä, niin sano
    ellauri061.html on line 355: you are asked this question next, say 'a 'haudankaivaja', 'sen rakentamat talot kestää tuomiopäivään asti.'
    ellauri061.html on line 365: HAMLET Has this fellow no feeling of his business, that he HAMLET Eixtää äijä tiedä missä hommissa se on, kun se laulaa haudankaivussa?
    ellauri061.html on line 371: But age, with his stealing steps, Mut aika hiipparoi varkaan lailla
    ellauri061.html on line 372: Hath claw'd me in his clutch, Se on ottanut mut kouriinsa
    ellauri061.html on line 379: might be the pate of a politician, which this ass voisi olla poliitikon pää, jonka tää perse-aasi
    ellauri061.html on line 384: sweet lord! How dost thou, good lord?' This might hyvä herra! Miten jaxatte, hyvä herra? Tää ois
    ellauri061.html on line 399: lawyer? Where be his quiddities now, his quillets, Missäs sen tämyydet on nyt, sen mikättimet,
    ellauri061.html on line 400: his cases, his tenures, and his tricks? why does he sen tapauxet, sopimuxet, temput? Mixe antaa
    ellauri061.html on line 401: suffer this rude knave now to knock him about the tän törkymöykyn paiskia likaisella lapparilla nuppiaan,
    ellauri061.html on line 403: his action of battery? Hum! This fellow might be olla aikanaan iso maanhankkija, asetuxineen,
    ellauri061.html on line 404: in's time a great buyer of land, with his statutes, sitoumuxineen, sakkoineen, kaxoistakauxineen,
    ellauri061.html on line 405: his recognizances, his fines, his double vouchers, takaisinvoittoineen: onko tää sakko sen sakoista, ja
    ellauri061.html on line 406: his recoveries: is this the fine of his fines, and takaisinvoitto sen takaisinvoitoista, se että se saa
    ellauri061.html on line 407: the recovery of his recoveries, to have his fine kallonsa täyteen sakkaa? Eikö sen takauxet takaa sille
    ellauri061.html on line 408: pate full of fine dirt? will his vouchers vouch him enää sen ostoja, ei edes 2-kertaiset, enempää kuin parin
    ellauri061.html on line 409: no more of his purchases, and double ones too, than välikirjan pinta-alan verran? Sen maiden omistuxensiirrot
    ellauri061.html on line 411: very conveyances of his lands will hardly lie in
    ellauri061.html on line 412: this box; and must the inheritor himself have no more, ha?
    ellauri061.html on line 417: in that. I will speak to this fellow. Whose Mäpä puhun tälle veikolle. Kenkäs hauta tää on, hyvä mies?
    ellauri061.html on line 418: grave's this, sirrah?
    ellauri061.html on line 441: galls his kibe. How long hast thou been a
    ellauri061.html on line 450: First Clown Why, because he was mad: he shall recover his wits Pelle 1 Nokö se oli hullu: sen piti tulla siellä järkiinsä; tai jossei tuu,
    ellauri061.html on line 458: First Clown Faith, e'en with losing his wits. Pelle 1 No saakuri, se sekosi.
    ellauri061.html on line 468: First Clown Why, sir, his hide is so tanned with his trade, that Pelle 1 No kaskun sen nahka on niin parkittu, ettei se kastu hyvään aikaan; ja
    ellauri061.html on line 471: Here's a skull now; this skull has lain in the earth
    ellauri061.html on line 477: flagon of Rhenish on my head once. This same skull, Pelle 1 Piru vieköön pähkähullun kaverin! Se kaatoi kerran mun päähän pullon
    ellauri061.html on line 479: HAMLET This? HAMLET Tääkö?
    ellauri061.html on line 485: borne me on his back a thousand times; and now, how karmeelta se näyttää mun mielikuvissa! Mun sappi nousee suuhun sitä
    ellauri061.html on line 493: her paint an inch thick, to this favour she must
    ellauri061.html on line 497: HAMLET Dost thou think Alexander looked o' this fashion i' HAMLET Luulexä että Alexanteri näytti tältä mullassa?
    ellauri061.html on line 521: The queen, the courtiers: who is this they follow? Kuningatar, hoviväki: ketä ne saattavat?
    ellauri061.html on line 522: And with such maimed rites? This doth betoken Ja noin tökeröillä menoilla? Tää tarkoittaa,
    ellauri061.html on line 563: Till of this flat a mountain you have made, kunnes ootte tehneet sievän kummun
    ellauri061.html on line 569: Like wonder-wounded hearers? This is I, kuin ihmeen haavoittamat kuulijat? Se oon mä tässä,
    ellauri061.html on line 584: HAMLET Why I will fight with him upon this theme HAMLET Mit vit, mä tappelen sen kanssa tästä aiheesta
    ellauri061.html on line 600: Singeing his pate against the burning zone, joka ulottuu kuumaan kehään saakka, saa Ossan näyttämään
    ellauri061.html on line 603: QUEEN GERTRUDE This is mere madness: KUNINGATAR GERTRUDE: Tää on pelkkää hulluutta:
    ellauri061.html on line 612: The cat will mew and dog will have his day. Kissa naukuu kuitenkin ja koiralla on hauskaa.
    ellauri061.html on line 620: This grave shall have a living monument: Tälle haudalle tulee näköispazas:
    ellauri061.html on line 625: Critics have spent a considerable amount of time debating Hamlet's age. Hamlet here is thirty years old, as the First Clown makes clear (lines 133-151). However, "young Hamlet", as he is referred to earlier in the play is still attending university and courting Ophelia. Laertes says that Hamlet's love is like "a violet in the youth of primy nature" (1.3.6). The noted scholar Grant White was so annoyed by this dilemma that he, defying logic, concluded that Hamlet was twenty when the play started and thirty at its close. (See Studies in Shakespeare, p. 79 ff.). How important is Hamlet's age to our understanding or enjoyment of the play? Would Hamlet's age have been an issue for play-goers at Shakespeare's Globe? For more on this topic, please click here.
    ellauri061.html on line 659: Of deaths put on by cunning and forc'd cause; Ovelasti ja/tai pakosta tehdyistä murhista;
    ellauri061.html on line 660: And, in this upshot, purposes mistook Ja tässä lopussa, väärinkäsityxistä
    ellauri061.html on line 661: Fall'n on th' inventors' heads. All this can I mitkä osui Juhaa leukaan. Eikä siinä vielä kaikki,
    ellauri061.html on line 689: Snobien historiaan tulee uusia lukuja, sitä mukaa kun puurran eteenpäin Carassuxen väikkäriä. Nyt olen päässyt lukuun nimeltä Les grandes années du snobisme.
    ellauri061.html on line 774: The Times of Israel has reached out to Gal Barak for his response. Han verkar ha gjort sig oanträffar. Det syns omöjligt att överhuvudtaget få tag på någon i företaget.
    ellauri061.html on line 776: Ehud Barak says he is the blessed man to lead Israel. Another Messiah. His original name was Brog. He has 3 children, wonder if one of them is called Gal. In an interview with Haaretz reported in January 2015, Barak was asked to explain the source of his "big" capital, with which he "bought 5 apartments and connected them," and by which he "lives in a giant rental apartment in a luxury high rise." Barak said he currently earns more than a $1 million a year, and that from 2001 to 2007, he also earned more than a $1 million every year, from giving lectures and from consulting for hedge funds. Barak also said he made millions of dollars more from his investments in Israeli real estate properties.
    ellauri061.html on line 778: In the interview, Barak was asked whether he is a lobbyist that earns a living from "opening doors." The interviewer stated "You have arrived recently at the Kazakhstan despot Nazarbayev and the president of Ghana. You are received immediately." Barak confirmed that he has been received by these heads of state but denied earning money from opening doors for international business deals for Israeli and foreign corporations, and said he does not see any ethical or moral problems in his business activities. He further said there is no logic to demand of him, after "the natural process in democracy has ended" to not utilize the tools he accumulated in his career to secure his financial future. When asked if his financial worth is $10–15 million, Barak said "I'm not far from there."
    ellauri061.html on line 783: Tolkien invented the name "Balrog", providing an in-universe etymology for it as a word in his invented Sindarin language.
    ellauri061.html on line 793: Answer: The account of Deborah and Barak is found in Judges 4 and 5 in the Old Testament. The Israelites had been under the control of the Canaanite king Jabin and the commander of his army, Sisera. The Canaanites had 900 chariots of iron and ruled over Israel for 20 years (Judges 4:2–3).
    ellauri061.html on line 797: Deborah and Barak then gathered 10,000 troops and attacked Sisera and his army. Barak’s troops won: “All Sisera’s troops fell by the sword; not a man was left” (Judges 4:16). Sisera himself fled to the tent of a Hebrew woman named Jael. She gave him milk to drink and covered him with a blanket in the tent. Then, “Jael . . . picked up a tent peg and a hammer and went quietly to him while he lay fast asleep, exhausted. She drove the peg through his temple into the ground, and he died” (verse 21).
    ellauri061.html on line 799: Following this battle, “God subdued Jabin king of Canaan before the Israelites. And the hand of the Israelites pressed harder and harder against Jabin king of Canaan until they destroyed him” (Judges 4:23–24). Deborah’s prophecy was fulfilled: Barak won, Sisera was killed by a woman, and the Israelites were freed from their enemies.
    ellauri061.html on line 803: The song of Deborah and Barak also gives some more detail about the victory over the Canaanites: “The earth shook, the heavens poured, / the clouds poured down water” (Judges 5:4). Evidently, God used a flood to disable the iron chariots of Sisera. The victory was supernatural (verse 20). Chapter 5 concludes with the statement, “And the land had peace forty years.” This impressive time of peace lasted until Midian took control of Israel, necessitating Gideon’s rise.
    ellauri061.html on line 805: Lessons for today from the lives of Deborah and Barak include the following: 1) God often calls people to step out in faith to attempt the unexpected, 2) God often uses unlikely people and sources to accomplish His plans, 3) God sometimes requires great risk and effort on our behalf as part of His divine plan. In the case of Deborah and Barak, they risked their lives in war, while Jael took in a runaway fugitive and risked her life to end his and help free Israel from oppression. Ultimately, this account reveals that God is in control of the nations and changes their leaders according to His desires.
    ellauri061.html on line 845: waldamiehist/ jotca owat hywän tahtoiset

    ellauri061.html on line 882: Cananerein Cuningat Thaanachis Megiddon

    ellauri061.html on line 1009:

    Lao Rui: Ei se ole tauti, se on competitive strategy. Jos ei saa kaivetuxi syvälti kannattaa pöyhistellä laajalti. Populus on valtaosin vulgusta, ergo populäärin on pakosta oltava vulgääri.
    ellauri061.html on line 1011: Pervon äiti on alzheimeri ja hävinnyt jonnekkin pöpelikköön Rovaniemelle. Ei paljon kiinnosta. Pervo ei näytä arvostavan isäpappaakaan mitenkään lujasti. Se näyttääkin olevan poikansa lainen ruikuttaja ja pöyhistelijä.
    ellauri061.html on line 1091: ”Nyt myöhemmin olen kauhistellut, että äitini olisi pitänyt olla minusta monta kertaa hyvinkin huolissaan, mutta hän ei ollut moxiskaan. Sain elämöidä aivan vapaasti. Äiti ajeli vaan mummon autolla ja korkkas keskareita.”
    ellauri061.html on line 1187: Poikasena minusta piti tulla maailman paras jalkapalloilija. Polvi rustottui. Pervon pitää muistaa kysyä vaimolta kotona näkeekö miehissä nauraessa pojan. Porsaan, korjaa vaimo Kati. Veli Pontevan. Isona minusta piti tulla maailman paras kirjailija. Pää rustottui.
    ellauri061.html on line 1282: Moniäänisessä, infoa ja pervomaista paskaviihdettä tulvivassa demokratiassa puheenvuoroja ei anneta, ei edes (lue varsinkaan) maahanmuuttajille, vaan ne siepataan. Ottakaa, hyvät maahanmuuttajat, kynä käteen. Kamera olalle, niin mäkin teen. Ei hyvä kamera paljon maxa, ja ainahan niitä voi siepata. Niin mäkin teen. Poliisin poikana mä kuumun murhista ja näpistelystä. Ei vaitiskaan, isukki maalas talon seiniä.
    ellauri061.html on line 1295: Kirjailija Jari Tervo jakoi tiistaina Twitterissä yhdysvaltalaisen Now This -videouutiskanavan videon TV-evankelista Paula Whitesta: Kirmaan heti helvettiin jos tämä kielillä puhuva sekopää pääsee taivaaseen, Tervo kirjoitti.
    ellauri061.html on line 1645: All follow this, and come to dust. mennä kaikki samaa tietä tuhkaxi.
    ellauri061.html on line 1662: Cymbeline on William Shakespearen kirjoittama, melko harvoin esitetty näytelmä, joka luokitellaan historialliseksi romanssiksi. Cymbeline on kuningas ja isä, joka on ajautumassa täydelliseen katastrofiin sekä poliittisesti että perheensä kanssa. Rooman valtakunnan sotilaat ovat nousemassa maihin ja Britannia on vaarassa tulla suurvallan murskaamaksi, kuningaskunnan suunnan määrää juonitteleva kuningatar. Näytelmä kertoo viattomuudesta ja kateudesta, katoamisista ja jälleennäkemisestä sekä ennen kaikkea anteeksiannosta.
    ellauri062.html on line 56: Se oli meidän elämä. Me ollaan SYYLLISIÄ.  Pornomestari Muhuhuu on pahoillaan, mutta meidän isot hiilijalat aiheuttaa tän. Eikä me voida sille mitään. Me ollaan vaan pikku apinoita jotka lisääntyvät liikaa. Darwinin jymymenestys, iso jytky. Astutaan toisia apinoita niinkauan kuin aikaa riittää. Kovennetaan pikku pippeliä sarvikuonon sarvijauholla. Lisäännytään kunnes täyttyy maa. Under his eye. In a while, crocodile. Hetki enää vaan niin tulee valmista. Jalanjälkiä on jo joka paikassa.
    ellauri062.html on line 86: “Does he have unrealistic beliefs about her/his power, wealth or skills?”
    ellauri062.html on line 98: Sam, who has always adored his wife and been faithful to her, now makes sexual advances to the nurse aides who care for him.
    ellauri062.html on line 100: Fred, a retired psychologist who had a very successful practice, now makes rude and cruel comments to those around him. One of his strengths before Alzheimer's had been his kindness and ability to relate to others.
    ellauri062.html on line 137: Focus on his feelings, not yours :).
    ellauri062.html on line 255: As punishment, Fred whips Serena' butt with his belt and forces Offred to watch as he does. Nick goes looking for Luke and finds him in a bar. He tells Luke that June is alright but Luke says that she isn't fine. Nick tells her that June is pregnant. This upsets Luke and he tells Nick to get out but then changes his mind and invites him in again.
    ellauri062.html on line 265: June explains to flabbergasted Serena that Gilead is not an ideal place for a child, specifically a daughter, to grow up in as their very existence is risky. She manages to convince Serena, who then tearfully says a prayer and hands the baby back over to June. June, in turn, gives Serena a blessing as well and leaves behind a tearful Serena as she and another Martha leave to escape Gilead. Fred is left alone in the room and looks at the carving, "Nolite te bastardes carborundorum," on the wall. Nick offers his "cigar" to Serena and she takes a good hold of it and takes a drag. Fred gets a moment alone with June to tell her he’s concerned about Serena.
    ellauri062.html on line 271: Waterfront expresses his love for his wife while gazing down at the menu.
    ellauri062.html on line 279: Fred says she is a good writer but Serena is bitter that he took that right away from her. Fred admits that he did not realize how much it would cost. Serena asks him to imagine how their lives would be like if Gilead never happened. Fred replies that he would still be in marketing and might quit his job. Fred admits that he has been sterile all along. In fact he is gay and has had an affair with Nick and Mark Tuello (who dat?) in the closet. Mark Tuello’s car is a 2018 Dodge Charger GT [LD].
    ellauri062.html on line 292: Because the book has been frequently challenged or banned in some of the United States of America over the last thirty years, many people have expressed discontent at The Handmaid's Tale's presence in the classroom. Some of these challenges have come from parents concerned about the explicit sexuality and other adult themes represented in the book. Others have argued that The Handmaid's Tale depicts a negative view of religion, a view supported by several academics who propose that Atwood's work satirizes contemporary religious fundamentalists in the United States, offering a feminist critique of the trends this movement to the Right represents.
    ellauri062.html on line 305: Juotikas sai kuin saikin 3v kirjallisuusapurahaa 2014 . Oliko lautakunnan puhis Mies Hissi Kone? (Mies Hssi Masheen palaa kuvaan s.557. Onxe niiku Pekka ja Zinda niiku Ilona? Pallinaama ja pallinaamempi.) Ei tullut tällä tiiliskivellä ihan Finlandiaa, kun se meni sille toiselle tiilelle, Jussi Valtosen kakaramaiselle kirjalle jonka nimikin oli lainaus Jeesuxelta. Kävikö Juotikas edes sykkiä? Se taitaa olla aika epäluotettava kertoja. Pikkusuinen Juotikas on Loimaalta. Siellä oltiin kerran lasten kanssa hiihtolomalla. Ei yhtään mäkiä. Juotikkaan kanssa pitää olla varovaisempi, ettei suxet exy samalle ladulle ja tule noloja akkoja.
    ellauri062.html on line 344: Toi jättipenismeemi on varmaan koodattu syvälle joidenkin nörtti-ituratojen geeneihin, sillä se esiintyy Nipsun (Pynchonin) Sateenkaaresssa (vaahtomuovisten jättipenisten pituus à 2m) ja sitten taas uudelleen Amazonin nettitv-sarjassa The Boys 1/2, joka kertoo kuinkas ollakaan supermiehistä ja parista token naisesta, sisältää salaliittoja ja eikös muuta, jättipenixiä, tällä kertaa 3m pitusia. Tää ei voi mitenkään olla sattuma.
    ellauri062.html on line 392: Albert "Bert" Newton Stubblebine III (February 6, 1930 – February 6, 2017)[1] was a United States Army major general whose active duty career spanned 32 years. Beginning as an armor officer, he later transferred to intelligence. He is credited with redesigning the U.S. Army intelligence architecture during his time as commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) from 1981 to 1984, after which he retired from active service.
    ellauri062.html on line 400: Menocchio (Domenico Scandella, 1532–1599) was a miller from Montereale Valcellina, Italy, who was tried for heresy by the Roman Inquisition for his unorthodox religious views and then was burnt at the stake in 1599. - Taulun Judith beheading Holofernes (not Swee´pea!) maalasi Artemisia Gentileschi (Roma 1593 - Napoli 1652/53). Se on kyllä Uffizissa. Holofernes oli assyrialainen kenraali, eikä Rauhixen kovaa holottava lahtelainen mökkinaapuri.
    ellauri062.html on line 435: Ein weiterer wichtiger Inspirator war Guido von List, dessen Ansichten unter den Bezeichnungen Wotanismus und Armanismus bekannt wurden. Ariosophische Autoren verbanden Vorstellungen einer Überlegenheit der „arischen Rasse“ und Forderungen einer Reinerhaltung dieser vermeintlichen Rasse mit Elementen der Astrologie, der Zahlensymbolik, der Kabbala, der Graphologie und der Handlesekunst.[1] Die wichtigste ariosophische Organisation war der von Lanz gegründete Neutempler-Orden.
    ellauri062.html on line 437: Kansallissosialismin ja okkultismin väliset väitetyt yhteydet ovat olleet keskustelun kohteena erityisesti 1960-luvun alusta lähtien, tosin ensimmäiset aihetta käsittelevät kirjoitukset julkaistiin Ranskassa ja Yhdistyneessä kuningaskunnassa jo 1940-luvun alussa. Useiden dokumenttielokuvien ohella aiheesta on julkaistu lukuisia kirjoja, joista tunnetuimpia ovat Le Matin des Magiciens (1960) ja Trevor Ravenscroftin Pyhä keihäs (1972). Tätä kirjallisuutta on tutkinut historioitsija Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke teoksissaan The Modern Mythology of Nazi Occultism ja The Nazi Mysteries. Kansallissosialistien ja okkultismin yhteyttä korostava kirjallisuus muodostaa oman lajityyppinsä. Lajityypin toistuva piirre on väite, jonka mukaan natsit toimivat jonkinlaisen okkultistisen voiman tai salaseuran ohjauksessa.
    ellauri062.html on line 439: Koska natseja ohjailleen salaisen tahon olemassaoloa ei ole pystytty todistamaan, Goodrick-Clarke ja saksalainen historioitsija Michael Rißmann ovat kuvailleet lajityyppiä näennäishistoriaksi. Okkultismin ja pakanuuden vaikutuksesta kansallissosialismiin on kuitenkin tehty myös akateemista tutkimusta, ja aihepiiri kuuluu kansallissosialismin uskonnollisesta puolesta käytyyn tieteelliseen keskusteluun. Jos siinä vaikka sittenkin olisi jotakin!
    ellauri062.html on line 448: Minkä alan maisteri tää on? Oisko hissan. Niitähän on paljon työttöminä. (Ei ollut, kazo alla.)
    ellauri062.html on line 592: Luvussa 171 lukijaa pyydetään johtamaan Pedon luvusta numerokoodi, joka ilmoittaa jalopeuran nimen. Vastaus on ”tietysti” 6 x 6 x 6 = 216, josta ilmeisesti kristillisen numeromystiikan avulla voidaan johtaa sana ”arieh” eli jalopeura. Tämä arvoitus ratkeaa melko helposti kertolaskulla, ja arvauksen voi tarkistaa internetin hakukoneilla. Vielä vaikeampi on luvussa 186 esitetty arvoitus, jossa lukijaa pyydetään selvittämään fiktiivisen lääkeyhtiön mainoksessa esiintyneen virren numero evankelis-luterilaisessa vizikirjassa (N, 528.) Tämän arvoituksen ratkaiseminen ilman ”huijaamista” on tietääkseni mahdotonta. Lukijan täytyy vain löytää luvuista se, jossa onnitellaan oikeasta vastauksesta virsiarvoitukseen. Linkki johtaa lukuun 158, ja virsi numero 158, ”Vihan päivä kauhistava, sydänjuuret värähtää”, on oikea vastaus (N, 450). Voiko tätä pitää linkkinä? Ohjeet ovat jälleen monimutkaiset, mutta tässä tapauksessa lukijalta vaaditaan arvoituksen ratkaisemiseen myös ergodista toimintaa. Ei riitä kurkistaa lopusta, pitää googlata Juonikasta käsitellyt Turun yliopiston gradu.
    ellauri062.html on line 602: Dies irae, dies illa Vihan päivä kauhistava! Vihan päivä tuop on päivä Day of Satan's painful duty!
    ellauri062.html on line 674: Huic ergo parce, Deus: Sitä säästä siis sä pyhis,
    ellauri062.html on line 851: Hänellä ei ole mitään tarkoitusta itsensä ulkopuolella, ei mitään muuta mitä varten elää – enää hän ei tahdo, ei voi eikä hänen täydy olla orja: ihmisten yhteiskunta ja sen sosiaali-etiikka eivät merkitse hänelle mitään; hän on yksin, yksin. Hän on nyt yksi ja kaikki; ja siksi hänellä on laki itsessään, siksi hän on itse kaikki laki eikä mitään mielivaltaa. Ja hän vaatii itseltään, että seuraa tätä lakia itsessään, tätä itsekexittyä lakia, että on vain lakia ... Lakilyy. Im a poor lonesome cowboy a long way from home. Tässä tämä kauhistuttava suurus: ei ole mitään muuta mikä velvoittaisi. Lännen laki on lyijyä. ... Sanoa jawohl tälle yksinäisyydelle on se, mikä Kantissa on "dionyysistä"; vasta se on siveellisyyttä.
    ellauri062.html on line 861: Nää Gurny ja Klingsor on jotain Wagnerin Parsifalin hahmoja. Gurny on joku outo ämmyrkäinen, vähänkun Valtaistuinkisan wildlingiä vastaava. Klingsor ei olekaan tanskalainen kaupunki, vaan pahis joka putos Graalin kupposen pelastustiimistä sinivärisammioon ja rupes konnaxi. Wagner on eri ilkeän näkönen kaveri. Ilmetty Ruozin pääpandemonologi ilman pokia takaa ajamattomana. Gurnemanz on vähän mun näkönen kilppi vanha partapozo.
    ellauri062.html on line 917: Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, one of the most celebrated rabbits in the history of Judaism, says that jews are a "different species" than non-jews, non-jews come from a "Satanic sphere" while jews are "holy", and that non-jews only exist to serve jews.
    ellauri062.html on line 919: Shahak, an Israeli professor who was a survivor of the Nazi holocaust, describes a 1962 book published in Israel in a bilingual edition. The Hebrew text was on one page, with the English translation on the facing page. The Hebrew text of a major Jewish code of laws contained a command to exterminate Jewish infidels: “It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands.” The English version on the facing page softened it to “It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.’” The Hebrew page then went on to name which “infidels” must be exterminated, adding “may the name of the wicked rot.” Among them was Jesus of Nazareth. The facing page with the English translation failed to tell any of this.
    ellauri062.html on line 932: The presence of Jesus the Nazarene in boiling excrement is one of the disputed references to Jesus in the Talmud. Onkelos raises up Yeshu by necromancy, and asks him about his punishment in Gehinnom. Jesus replies that he is in "boiling excrement." Tzoah Rotachat (Hebrew: צוֹאָה רוֹתֵחַת, tsoah rothachath – "boiling excrement") in the Talmud and Zohar is a location in Gehenna (Gehinnom) where the souls of Jews who committed certain sins are sent for punishment. This form of punishment is cited as being of extreme nature, if not the most extreme, in the sense that those individuals sentenced there are not given relief even on Shabbat, and are not released after the standard twelve-month period.
    ellauri062.html on line 942: The star they call the star of David is actually called the star of Moloch in scripture and is the symbol of Judaism as well. It´s strange that very few people realize this. This is true. It is also called in scripture the
    ellauri062.html on line 943: "star of Remphan".  The hexagram or 6-pointed star comes from the occult, and is to this day a very important symbol in witchcraft.  The phrase "putting a hex" on someone comes from the hexagram. (Höpöhöpö. Se on ikivanha indogeraaninen sana *k´ak. Mit Behagen.)
    ellauri062.html on line 945: fact that Solomon delved deeply into the occult/Satanic world, and discovered and used this symbol to command demons. (Höh tavallinen kalliokielohan se on.)
    ellauri062.html on line 946: Of particular interest is the fact that the hexagram is made by 6 lines, has 6 points, 6 triangles, and 6-sided polygon....corresponding to the prophecy of "666" related to the "Beast" in Revelation 13:18 (although of course, perhaps not literally fulfilling it, as it refers to the "number of his name"). See Apt 7:43 "Ja te otitta Molochin majan/ ja teidän jumalanne Remphan tähden/ nijtä cuwia joita te teitte teillenne cumartaxenne/ ja minä tahdon teidän eroitta edemmä Babelita."
    ellauri062.html on line 972: Tuoteryhmä: esseet historianfilosofia kulttuurifilosofia kansallissosialismi rasismi filosofia metafysiikka.
    ellauri062.html on line 1033: Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels, eigentlich Adolf Joseph Lanz (* 19. Juli 1874 in Penzing, heute Wien; † 22. April 1954 in Wien), war ein österreichischer Geistlicher, Ariosoph und Hochstapler. Er prägte den Begriff Ariosophie und gründete den Neutempler-Orden. Einige Jahre galt er als „der Mann, der Hitler die Ideen gab“. Diese Einschätzung, die auf einer Selbststilisierung beruht und in einer Biografie von 1958 verbreitet wurde, wird in neueren wissenschaftlichen Untersuchungen als unzutreffend angesehen.
    ellauri063.html on line 47: Yes, Orwell was not exactly LGBTQ-friendly. He had a lot of opinions which now seem eccentric or objectionable. He had a lifelong tendency to make disparaging remarks about vegetarians, or people who wore sandals. I suspect that this came from the association in his mind of socialism with people who lived the early 20th century equivalent of an alternative lifestyle: it was very important to Orwell to show people that being socialist didn’t mean that you had to have to have a long beard, wear sandals or not eat meat, and that socialism was thoroughly British, manly and commonsensical.
    ellauri063.html on line 51: His contradictory and sometimes ambiguous views about the social benefits of religious affiliation mirrored the dichotomies between his public and private lives: Stephen Ingle wrote that it was as if the writer George Orwell "vaunted" his unbelief while Eric Blair the individual retained "a deeply ingrained religiosity".
    ellauri063.html on line 65: Rosa Lichtenstein? I am not quite sure who this person is and who publishes her work, but I can scarcely find anything on her besides her own resource page. Which leads me to believe the addition of her in this is nothing more than self-promotion by the author in particular themselves. This lowers the quality of this article to let any random Blogger have their criticisms added to this. Dialectical Materialism is a serioues philolosophical school and method attached to Marxism, and there is lot of commentary on the subject without resorting to unpublished internet articles.
    ellauri063.html on line 67: Rosa Lichtenstein is no authority on anything dialectical. She is only a committed ideolog: whose apparent life-goal has become the complete rooting-out of dialectical-materialism from the workers' movement, in every aspect. And in this, she is single-minded -- to the point of very unhealthy obsession. Others can attest to this, and have.
    ellauri063.html on line 70: Anyway, what do you mean 'random blog'? It's not even a blog! In fact, my site contains the most detailed and comprehensive demolition of this 'theory' (dialectical materialism) ever written by a Marxist -- i.e., me. Rosa Lichtenstein. Listen:
    ellauri063.html on line 92: The first form seeks to bring ‘socialism’ to the mass of the population, whether they want it or not. It is imposed from above by a centralised, or even a democratically legitimated, state, as its name suggests. This app … (more)
    ellauri063.html on line 96: As Engels, Lenin and Trotsky argued, islands of socialism can't be created in a sea of capitalism, and any attempt to do so will always fail. The Stalinists and Maoists disagreed, but, alas, history has shown that Engels, Lenin and Trotsky were right, and they were wrong.
    ellauri063.html on line 100: However, this version of socialism has to spread and take over the core economies of capitalism so that it can't be strangled in the above manner — as the proletariat of each country rebel against their own ruling-class. Each strike, for example, is a mini-rehearsal for this (whether the strikers appreciate this or not), where workers are forced by circumstances to organise in their own communities, sharing money, clothing, food, shelter, etc. In effect, they have to run a mini-socialist society of their own for a few weeks or months.
    ellauri063.html on line 102: This is a basic fact about Marx’s view of socialism that SD, Stalin, Mao, Castro and all the rest who advocate socialism from above, have failed to comprehend, so determined were they to impose ‘socialism’ on other countries, or, indeed, on their own people.
    ellauri063.html on line 106: a) As Marx saw things, socialism/communism could only work if there existed a massive abundance in the society concerned (i.e., a very highly developed economy coupled with high levels of productivity). However, Marx began to change his mind later in life and thought some form of socialism might be possible even in backward Russia, but it is arguable that by then he was in his dotage.
    ellauri063.html on line 108: b) Equally, if not more important, a socialist/communist society can only be built by the working class, organised for and by themselves, acting democratically on their own behalf, and not relying on anyone else or any party to do this for them.
    ellauri063.html on line 210: mogwai is the transliteration of the Cantonese word 魔鬼 (Jyutping: mo1 gwai2; Standard Mandarin: 魔鬼; pinyin: móguǐ) meaning "monster", "evil spirit", "devil" or "demon". The term "mo" derives from the Sanskrit "Mara", meaning "evil beings" (literally "death"). In Hinduism and Buddhism, Mara determines fates of death and desire that tether people to an unending cycle of reincarnation and suffering. He leads people to sin, misdeeds, and self-destruction. Meanwhile, "gui" does not necessarily mean "evil" or demonic spirits. Classically, it simply means deceased spirits or souls of the dead.
    ellauri063.html on line 212: If a Mogwai gets wet, it spawns new Mogwai from its back; small balls of fur that are approximately the size of a marble pop out from the wet Mogwai's back, then the furballs start to grow in size before unfolding themselves into new and fully grown Mogwai. This process does not take much time but it still usually takes just about a minute. According to the novel, the creator of the species, Mogturmen, wanted the Mogwai to be able to easily reproduce themselves. The cocoon and gremlin stage are unwanted defects from when the Mogwai species was created. It turned out that all the positive attributes are recessive.
    ellauri063.html on line 214: Hyi helvetti. Nyt lähinnä kiinostaa: miten äsken syntynyt pitää olla et tämmönen paska on ihan vaan normipäivää, business as usual? Vai eikö se olekaan ikäkysymys vaan jonkinlainen rupusakki-indexi? Please God, help improve this Pynchon fan fiction. Kuvan Mogwailla on samanlaiset vilkkuluomet kuin Jaakolla.
    ellauri063.html on line 218: Le théâtre du Grand Guignol, plus couramment appelé Grand Guignol, est une ancienne salle de spectacles parisienne qui était située 7, cité Chaptal, dans le 9e arrondissement. Spécialisée dans les pièces mettant en scène des histoires macabres et sanguinolentes, elle a par extension donné son nom au genre théâtral, le grand guignol, et à l'adjectif grand-guignolesque. Le terme est devenu avec le temps péjoratif et désigne désormais, de manière plus générale, des œuvres abusant de la violence ou d'effets grandiloquents.
    ellauri063.html on line 220: Lingchi (Chinese: 凌遲), translated variously as the slow process, the lingering death, or slow slicing, and also known as death by a thousand cuts, was a form of torture and execution used in China from roughly 900 until it was banned in 1905. It was also used in Vietnam. In this form of execution, a knife was used to methodically remove portions of the body over an extended period of time, eventually resulting in death.
    ellauri063.html on line 227: Lancea et Clavus Domini: The Holy Lance, also known as The Spear of Destiny. Oldest part of the Regalia of the Holy Roman Empire and allegedly the spear that pierced the side of Christ on the Cross, with one of the Nails set into it. Hitler was particularly interested in this relic. Other Theories Are Available. Now in the Kaiserliche Schatzkammer of the Hofburg, Vienna.
    ellauri063.html on line 274: "Frontside Ollie" is a Finnish language song by Finnish teen pop artist Robin and his debut single taken from his debut album Koodi. Written by Sana Mustonen, it was released on Universal Music on 16 January 2012. #skateboarding Today's video is about the basic frontside ollie on transition. Useful for quarter pipes, mini ramps, bowls and more. Hit subscribe & leave your suggestions below for future skate hacks videos!
    ellauri063.html on line 295: Screenwriter Deborah Moggach initially attempted to make her script as faithful to the novel as possible, writing from Elizabeth's perspective while preserving much of the original dialogue. Joe Wright, who was directing his first feature film, encouraged greater deviation from the text, including changing the dynamics within the Bennet family. Wright and Moggach set the film in an earlier period and avoided depicting a "perfectly clean Regency world", presenting instead a "muddy hem version" of the time. Chickenbutt Knightley was well-known in part from her role in the Pirates of the Caribbean film series. It was marketed to a younger, mainstream audience; promotional items noted that it came from the producers of 2001's romantic comedy Bridget Jones's Diary before acknowledging its provenance as an Austen novel.
    ellauri063.html on line 304: Musiikki herättää mielikuvia yleishälytyksestä. Kihisevä Polymorphia-teos on sen sijaan tuttu muun muassa kauhuelokuvista Hohto ja Manaaja. Elokuvantekijät rakastavat Pendereckin musiikkia ja erityisesti hänen varhaista tuotantoaan.
    ellauri063.html on line 312: Songs in the Key of Z is a book and two compilation albums written and compiled by Irwin Chusid. The book and albums explore the field of what Chusid coined as "outsider music". Chusid defines outsider music as; "crackpot and visionary music, where all trails lead essentially one place: over the edge." Chusid's work has brought the music of several leading performers in the outsider genre to wider attention. These include Daniel Johnston, Joe Meek, Jandek and Wesley Willis. In addition, his CDs feature some recordings by artists who produced very little work but placed their recordings firmly in the outsider area. Notable amongst these are nursing home resident Jack Mudurian who sings snatches of several dozen songs in a garbled collection known as Downloading the Repertoire and the obscure and extreme scat singer Shooby Taylor AKA 'The Human Horn.'
    ellauri063.html on line 314: Scott "Walker" Engel's The Old Man's Back Again is dedicated to the neostalinist regime. Löysää hölkkää mutta kaskun kärki on nyt siinä että Putinin porukat on muka yleisössä. Scott 4 is Scott Walker's fifth solo album (a collection of songs he had performed for his BBC television series had been his fourth). It was originally released in late 1969 under his birth name, Scott Engel, and failed to chart. Subsequent reissues have been released under his stage name. It has since received praise as one of Walker's best works.
    ellauri063.html on line 316: Brötzmann Reflects on ‘Machine Gun’ as it Hits 50th Anniversary. The marathon, lung-bursting howl of Peter Brötzmann’s Machine Gun, which the saxophonist self-released on his BRÖ imprint 50 years ago, captured the anxiety of a generation grappling with the Vietnam War and civil unrest. The emotional and political complexity it was born from still resonates today.
    ellauri063.html on line 323: Raappanan lauluja hän kuvaili trubaduuriperusteisiksi sävellyksiksi, joissa pohdiskellaan elämänmenoa ja tilitetään koettua. Esiintymistä Tavastialla arvioineen Jukka Haurun mukaan Raappana on aidon tuntuinen reissumies, jolla on rehellisen tuntuinen kähisevä ääni mutta toivoton artikulaatio.
    ellauri063.html on line 326: Hörhömusan asiantuntijaa pitäs naurattaa et tää musamenu on olevinaan "kevyttä klassista" ja "jotain hissimusaa". Kerrassaan hulvatonta. Ankaran googlauxen jälkeen on kylä hymy hyytynyt ja vizit vähissä.
    ellauri063.html on line 352: The Babushka Lady is an unknown woman present during the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy who might have photographed the events that occurred in Dallas's Dealey Plaza at the time President John F. Kennedy was shot. Her nickname arose from the headscarf she wore, which was similar to scarves worn by elderly Russian women (бабушка – babushka – literally means "grandmother" or "old woman" in Russian). THE BABUSHKA LADY or TBL is an homage METALCORE band. This band was established on 1st october 2011 in Pondok Gede Bekasi. This band is actually established in 2009 with different positions. WE WANT TO FAMOUS ! AND WE WANT TO VALUABLE IN THE EYES OF GOD !!
    ellauri063.html on line 363: Tässä kirjassa ei ole oikeastaan yhtään naisia. Eipä silti, ei miehisiä miehiäkään ole juuri näyttäytynyt. Kaikki porukat on vaan sukupuolettoman Jaakon aivokummituxia. Jos Pervo teki ylilyöntejä virtuaalipaneskelemalla joka sivulla aivan kanimaisesti, niin Jaakko vastaavasti loistaa koko lisääntymisteeman poissaololla. Ei siinä mitään, eihän impotentti vanhus paljon kaipaa. Ajattelen tässä epäizekkäästi muita lukijoita :P. Mut ehkä Jaska on sevverran vitun hernekeppi nyhverö mikkihiiri kynäkaula ettei sillä ole kokemusta moisesta.
    ellauri063.html on line 370: Naisten puutetta selittävät Jaken määräävimmät synnynnäiset luonteenpiirteet: herkkyys ja ujous. (Mihis tunnekylmyys jäi?) Panokohtauxet kirjassa korvautuvat pitkillä Pekka Pessaarin suuhun laitetuilla sitaateilla Lanz von Liebenfelsiltä. Eikö nyt joku bändäri voisi jo näyttää sille närhen munat? Tää alkaa olla aika myötähävettävää. Niskapalkki on sananmuunnettuna paskanilkki. Mika Kingelin on oikeasti olemassa, se on development manager at Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö Turva, Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland. King size elin, haha. Pitkänhuiskea mutta ryhditön.
    ellauri063.html on line 394: Ensyklopedian, asiasanaston, muistion ynnä muiden romaanikerronnalle vieraiden tekstilajien kautta risteileviä episodejaan kuljettava proosamosaiikki vastaa ideamäärältään kymmentä hieman tavanomaista nokkelampaa suomalaista romaania, joten akateemisiin opinnäytteisiin ja kotimaiseen kirjallisuushistoriaan teos tarjoilee itseään auliisti.
    ellauri063.html on line 428: The novel's title is from Hamlet, Act V, Scene 1, in which Hamlet holds the skull of the court jester, Yorick, and says, "Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio: a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy: he hath borne me on his back a thousand times; and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is!" Wallace's working title for Infinite Jest was A Failed Entertainment. (PST: Hamnetista on lisää paasausta albumissa 61.)
    ellauri063.html on line 450: Köyhyyden kriminalisoinnille on historiallista pohjaa, joten vanhojen lakien päivittäminen voidaan aloittaa vaikka heti. Aikana 1664-1883 maassamme oli kiellettyä niin köyhyys, kerjääminen kuin työttömyyskin. Järjestelmän nimi oli palveluspakko. Sen sisältö oli lyhyesti sanoen sellainen, että jokaisen vähänkin työkykyisen oli pestauduttava jonkun toisen palvelukseen. Mikäli jossain tavattiin vailla palveluspaikkaa oleva työkykyinen irtolainen, köyhä tai kerjäläinen, hänelle seurasi ankara rangaistus. Miehet passitettiin alkuaikoina sotaväkeen ja myöhemmin pakkotyölaitoksiin, naiset kehruuhuoneisiin. Palveluspakon luonnollisia seurauksia olivat myös palkkasääntely kustannusten hillitsemiseksi ja rajoitettu työpaikan vaihto-oikeus työvoiman pysyvyyden varmistamiseksi. Viimeisenä varmistuksena oli isännänvalta, joka piti sisällään myös oikeuden ruumiilliseen kuritukseen.
    ellauri063.html on line 560: Herman Lindqvist: ruotsalainen populaarihistoriaan keskittyvä kirjailija. Hänen kirjojaan ovat muun muassa Napoléon ja Ruotsin historia. Taitavana historian elävöittäjänä pidetty Lindqvist tunnetaan myös historia-aiheisista TV-ohjelmistaan.
    ellauri063.html on line 589: In 2014 three letters written by Mahatma Gandhi to eldest son Harilal in 1935 were offered for auction. A translation of one of the letters (which was written in Gujarati) suggests that Gandhi was accusing Harilal of raping either his own daughter, Manu, or his sister-in-law. Tushar Gandhi (Mahatma Gandhi´s great-grandson) has suggested that the letter was poorly translated, and that the word being translated as rape may not have actually meant sexual assault. Rape is in fact virtually nonexistent in India, while mistranslation is extremely common.
    ellauri064.html on line 67: Welteislehre (auch Glazialkosmogonie oder kurz WEL) ist eine im Jahr 1913 veröffentlichte These des österreichischen Ingenieurs Hanns Hörbiger (1860–1931), nach der die meisten Körper des Weltalls aus Eis oder Metall bestehen. Im Sonnensystem sei die Erde der einzige Himmelskörper, für den dies nicht gelte; auch der Mond bestehe hingegen großteils aus Eis. Die Welteislehre widerspricht grundlegenden, auch zur Zeit Hörbigers schon lange bekannten astronomischen und physikalischen Erkenntnissen und wird heute allgemein als nachweislich falsch zurückgewiesen.
    ellauri064.html on line 77: Walter Benjamin was a radically innovative cultural theorist and a German Jewish Marxist, securing refuge in France in 1933. Following the 1940 Nazi invasion he fled France, bound for the USA. However, on the mountainous approach to the French–Spanish border he realised dictator Franco had suddenly blocked transit. Benjamin was in ill health and struggling to carry a briefcase with a heavy manuscript, which he declared more precious than his life. Sadly, he completed suicide: there was family history on his father's side.
    ellauri064.html on line 79: Benjamin maintained a fiercely productive focus on his intellectual mission throughout his life, despite repeatedly complaining of ‘grand-scale defeats’ and lows. After his request for divorce from Dora Pollak was granted in 1932, he suffered 10 paralysing days during which he seriously prepared suicide. Suicidal thoughts endured. He was an elegant, cultivated man who oozed old-world charm, exerting attraction on women but not always enough to give him cunt. Asja Lacis, the Latvian Communist Director of Children's Theatre in the USSR, twice refused, as did later lover Anna Maria Blaupot ten Cate. Lacis suffered relapsing mental illness and was hospitalised with hallucinations when Benjamin rushed to Moscow in 1926, at the brink of Stalinisation. His luminous Moscow Diary records his frustrating two-month experience.
    ellauri064.html on line 81: Benjamin's luscious Berlin Childhood around 1900 recalls his experience of the city's material culture as a boy. His family was commercially successful (rich) but relations with his parents and sister were poor, although he had a better relationship with his younger brother, because he died in a concentration camp. His bleak verdict on school life contrasted with that of his schoolmate Gershom Scholem, who become Professor of Jewish Mysticism at the newly established Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Benjamin impressed some as reserved, discreet and modest, others as oversensitive and uncompromising.
    ellauri064.html on line 83: He maintained a life-long friendship with Shulem. A feature of Benjamin's unorthodox Marxism was his attempt to invest it with the passions of Messianic Jewish mysticism. He was also friends with Theodor Adorno, a critical social theory pioneer who was deeply influenced by Benjamin and helped preserve his legacy. Adorno remarked that Benjamin's work had ‘settled at the cross-roads between magic and positivism. That place is bewitched’.
    ellauri064.html on line 85: Benjamin revolutionised text, image and film criticism. His essay ‘Hashish in Marseilles’ confirms that he experimented with drugs (‘under medical supervision’). He argued that reawakening the long-forgotten dreams of childhood could help recover the betrayed potential of technological progress, in the service of humanity's ‘redemption’ in this life. He collected children's books and recorded attentively the development of his son Stefan from behind the crib bars like his contemporary Piaget, especially sensation, imitation, gestures and spontaneity. This is from his celebrated modernist short pieces collection One Way Street:
    ellauri064.html on line 87: ‘A child in his nightshirt cannot be prevailed upon to greet a visitor. Those present, invoking a higher moral standpoint, admonish him in vain to overcome his prudery. A few minutes later he reappears, now stark naked, before the visitor. In the meantime, he has washed his tiny skinless wiener.’
    ellauri064.html on line 89: This precious manuscript was lost together with Benjamin's life. Shortly thereafter, Franco reopened the border and collaborationist Vichy French authorities rescinded deportation orders to Germany. I shared this tragic story of almost preventable loss of luggage with suicidal patients; and it has made a difference.
    ellauri064.html on line 91: Am Ende seines Lebens, sich auf der Flucht vor dem Faschismus und dabei in einer zunehmend aussichtslosen Lage befindend, greift er die gängige Fortschrittsmetapher auf: »Marx sagt, die Revolutionen sind die Lokomotiven der Weltgeschichte. Aber vielleicht ist dem gänzlich anders. Vielleicht sind die Revolutionen der Griff des in diesem Zug reisenden Menschengeschlechts nach der Notbremse.« Sehr ähnlich klingt es, wenn Greta Thunberg bei der UN-Klimakonferenz in Katowice davon spricht, dass es die einzig vernünftige Sache sei, die Notbremse zu ziehen. Walter veti hätäjarrusta ja sen juna pyhästyi. Matkalaukku tosin joutui hävyxiin. Arthur Koestler koitti samaa muttei älynnyt vetää vetimestä tarpeexi kovaa. Vuonna 83 se koitti uudestaan Ebba vaimon kanssa ja onnistui.
    ellauri064.html on line 102: Arthur Koestler (unk. Kösztler Artúr; 5. syyskuuta 1905 Budapest – 3. maaliskuuta 1983 Lontoo) oli unkarilaissyntyinen toimittaja, kirjailija, historioitsija ja tutkija, joka sai myöhemmin Britannian kansalaisuuden. Kösztler liittyi Saksan kommunistiseen puolueeseen 1931, mutta puhdistettiin syystä puolueesta 1938. Hän asui pääasiassa Lontoossa ja työskenteli kirjailijana ja luennoitsijana. Kesäkuussa 1950 hän piti puheen antikommunististen intellektuellien tilaisuudessa Berliinissä, mikä johti Congress for Cultural Freedomin perustamiseen. Myöhemmin hän kiinnostui paranormaaleista ilmiöistä ja tutki muun muassa levitaatiota ja telepatiaa. Vuonna 1983 hän teki itsemurhan kolmannen vaimonsa Cynthian kanssa sairastettuaan parkinsonin tautia ja leukemiaa. Testamentissaan hän määräsi varansa käytettäväksi parapsykologian professuurin (engl. Koestler Chair of Parapsychology) perustamiseen Edinburghin yliopistoon. Täys pelle siis.
    ellauri064.html on line 167: Fjotolf Hansen, ent. Anders Behring Breivik [ˈɑnːəʂ ˈbeːrɪŋ ˈbrɛiviːk] on norjalainen terroristi, joka teki 22. heinäkuuta 2011 terrori-iskut Oslossa ja Utøyan saarella Oslon lähistöllä. Iskuissa kuoli 77 ihmistä. Ei tiettävästi sukua tuulitakki-Hellylle.
    ellauri064.html on line 199: Ground Control to Major Tom. David Bowien ykköshitti Space Oddity. Bowie-puukko on semmonen iso puukko kun oli sillä aussie jäbällä "that ain't no knife. Now this is a knife." Selvä penismeemi. Was he gay, bisexual or bowie? Kai tätä kaikkea. Gender outlaws are cool. Laulussa on myös ankeampi teema, ja sanoitus on myös vertauskuva huumausaineille. Kappaleessa kuultava lähtölaskenta onkin kuvaus heroiinipiikin ottamisen ja sen vaikutuksen alkamisen väliselle ajalle. Heroiinia on pidetty traumatisoituneiden ja heikosta itsetunnosta kärsineiden henkilöiden huumeena, minkä vuoksi se toimi hyvänä metaforana hylätylle, avaruudessa ajelehtivalle astronautille. Huumeaihe oli Bowielle jokseenkin tuttu, sillä hän oli itse kokeillut heroiinia vuonna 1968.
    ellauri064.html on line 217: Camorra ei ole Talvivaaran puhistustekniikka, vaan Italiassa Napolin seudulla Campaniassa toimiva mafian tyyppinen rikollisjärjestö. Nykyään camorristit kutsuvat järjestöään sisäisesti nimellä sistema, 'järjestelmä'. Camorra on lajissaan Italian suurin, taloudellisesti merkittävin ja väkivaltaisin.
    ellauri064.html on line 262: Robert James Zdarsky (June 3, 1950 – March 30, 2015), better known by his stage name Robert Z´Dar, was an American character actor and film producer, best known for his role as officer Matt Cordell in the cult horror film Maniac Cop and its two sequels. Never heard. Kärsi kerubismista (leukavuudesta). Rokonarpiset ihmiset on nykyään yleensä kärsineet pahasta aknesta.
    ellauri064.html on line 276: Der Völkische Beobachter (VB) war von Dezember 1920 bis zum 30. April 1945 das publizistische Parteiorgan der NSDAP. In scharfer Abgrenzung zu bürgerlichen Zeitungen bezeichnete sich der VB als „Kampfblatt“ und war programmatisch mehr an Agitation als an Information interessiert. Pressehistoriker nannten den VB daher „plakathaft“ und seinen Stil „mehr gesprochen als geschrieben“. Zunächst erschien der VB zweimal wöchentlich, ab dem 8. Februar 1923 täglich im Franz-Eher-Verlag in München. Er wurde nach den Anfangsjahren reichsweit vertrieben.
    ellauri064.html on line 280: Unabomber Theodore John Kaczynski (/kəˈzɪnski/; born May 22, 1942), also known as the Unabomber (/ˈjuːnəbɒmər/), is an American domestic terrorist, anarchist, and former mathematics professor. He was a mathematics prodigy, but he abandoned his academic career in 1969 to pursue a more primitive lifestyle. Between 1978 and 1995, he killed three people and injured 23 others in an attempt to start a revolution by conducting a nationwide bombing campaign targeting people involved with modern technology. In conjunction with this effort, he issued a social critique opposing industrialization while advocating a nature-centered form of anarchism.
    ellauri064.html on line 282: In 1971, Kaczynski moved to a remote cabin without electricity or running water near Lincoln, Montana, where he lived as a recluse while learning survival skills in an attempt to become self-sufficient. He witnessed the destruction of the wilderness surrounding his cabin and concluded that living in nature was untenable; he began his bombing campaign in 1978. In 1995, he sent a letter to The New York Times and promised to "desist from terrorism" if the Times or The Washington Post published his essay Industrial Society and Its Future, in which he argued that his bombings were extreme, but necessary to attract attention to the erosion of human freedom and dignity by modern technologies that require large-scale organization.
    ellauri064.html on line 287: With the Newseum in Washington, D.C. closing its doors at the end of this month, many pieces of American history may be needing new homes. It includes an infamous piece that is from Montana. The museum is home to the wilderness cabin that was once home to Ted Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber.
    ellauri064.html on line 292: The historical Newseum is closing its doors after more than a decade in its Washington, D.C. location.
    ellauri064.html on line 311: Thomas "Pip pip" Jeeves Horder, 1st Baron Horder, known as ‘Tommy’, was created a baronet in 1923 and Baron Horder in 1933 in recognition of his services as physician to several British monarchs and Prime Ministers, including the pro-nazi abdicate Edvard VII.
    ellauri064.html on line 318: Timo Soini kuitenkin vaivaantui menestyksestämme, sillä jo tuolloin hänen mielessään siinsivät vain puoluejohtajan omat hillotolpat. Kertakaikkisen surkeaa johtajuutta puolueensa tuhoksi ja myös hänen itsensä ja opetuslastensa tuhoksi, kuten hänen myöhempi historiansa on todistanut.
    ellauri064.html on line 329: Hirvisaari is a former train driver, educated at the Helsinki Pasila engine drivers' school in 1980–1982. He was admitted to University of Helsinki in 1999 to study theology, and is still registered as an undergraduate student. Hirvisaari undertook his military national service in the Kymi Anti-Aircraft Battalion in 1979–1980 in the city of Kouvola.
    ellauri064.html on line 331: During his 2011 election campaign Hirvisaari was critical of the immigration policies in Finland ("Maahanmuutto hallintaan! – Immigration under control!), and supported national sovereignty ("Riittää, että kansalaiset ovat sitä mieltä – muita perusteluja ei tarvita." – "It is enough that the citizens are of that opinion – no other arguments are needed.") as well as Finland generally as a country ("Suomen kieli – Suomen mieli – Suomen luonto – Suomen lippu" – "Finnish language – Finnish mindset – Finnish nature – Finnish flag"). In July 2011 Hirvisaari stated that the killings in Oslo on 22 July 2011, by right-wing extremist Anders Behring Breivik (Fjotolf Hansen), were a side-effect of Norway's immigration policies.
    ellauri064.html on line 333: Just before the 2011 general election Hirvisaari was prosecuted for his blog in the Uusi Suomi newspaper web site under the title "Kikkarapäälle kuonoon" ("Sock the kinkyhead"). The text referenced an attack on a foreign person in Helsinki — Hirvisaari wrote that the crime had not necessarily been a racist one. In November 2010 the district court of Päijät-Häme dropped the charges against him of incitement. After consultation with the deputy general attorney, Jorma Kalske, the state appealed against the verdict. In December the Kouvola court of appeals found Hirvisaari guilty of incitement and fined him.
    ellauri064.html on line 345: He also discusses some challenges faced when developing dialogical practices. He looked at Open Dialogues as used in psychiatry and Anticipation Dialogues as used in the no-mans-land between health, social, education and other services around common clients. By seeking to “benchmark” OD and AD, his hope is to gain insight not only into these two approaches, but also into the conditions for generating dialogicity in general.
    ellauri064.html on line 349: Teoksen jälkisanoissa Arnkil kertoo, että tapahtumien historialliset raamit pitävät paikkansa ja suuri osa henkilöistä on oikeasti eläneitä ihmisiä. Lukija onkin vakuuttunut kirjailijan laajasta ja syvällisestä asiantuntemuksesta ja nostaa sille nöyrästi hattua. Pelkkä asiantuntemus ei kuitenkaan tee romaanista kiinnostavaa. Arnkililla on ollut vaikeuksia puhaltaa tapahtumiin ja henkilöihin eloa. Benin kiertomatka on tarjonnut mahdollisuuden esitellä kansanheimoja, niiden tapoja, uskontoja ja palvontamenoja, mutta lukijasta reissun kuvaus on melko puuduttavaa, vaikka tarinan elävöittämiseksi on nähty vaivaa. Henilönä Ben on pökkelö. Hän on usein peloissaan, mitä kuvataan epävarmalla pu-pu-puheella. Olisiko tämä keino hieman pölyinen?
    ellauri064.html on line 380: Harkonnen, The Baron Vladimir (/ ˈ h ɑːr k oʊ n ən / or / h ɑːr ˈ k oʊ n ən /) is a fictional character from the Dune franchise created by Frank Herbert.
    ellauri064.html on line 385: Yrjö von Grönhagen (3 October 1911 in Saint Petersburg – 17 October 2003 in Helsinki[1]) was a Finnish nobleman and anthropologist. He is best known on his 1930s work at the Nazi pseudoscientific institute Ahnenerbe.
    ellauri064.html on line 386: During World War II, the Nazi-minded Grönhagen worked for Finland´s propaganda department and served as its military attaché in Berlin. He was arrested in Oslo 1945 and held in custody for two years. After his release Grönhagen was a businessman and emigrated to Greece in 1964. He first lived in Crete and later in Athens serving as the Master of the Christian Order Ordo Sancti Constantini Magni.
    ellauri064.html on line 391: The story of Hildisvíni appears in Hyndluljóð, an Old Norse poem found in Flateyjarbok but often considered a part of the Poetic Edda. In the poem, Freyja is searching for the ancestry of her protégé, Óttar. Freyja rides on her boar Hildisvíni, who is in fact Óttar in disguise. They meet Hyndla who is a seeress. Freyja succeeds in forcing Hyndla to tell Óttar about his ancestors.
    ellauri064.html on line 417: Maria Åkerblom syntyi ruotsinkieliseen mäkitupalaisperheeseen Tammisaaren lähellä, alkoi jo 14-vuotiaana nähdä enneunia ja saarnasi maailmanlopusta. Hän vaikutti 1920-luvulla erityisesti Kokkolan lähistöllä muun muassa Teerijärvellä ja Alavetelissä, mutta hän saarnasi myös Helsingissä. Hän sai epävakaissa oloissa huomattavan seuraajakunnan, joka luotti häneen lähes sokeasti. Hänen saarnaamislahjojaan pidettiin poikkeuksellisina, joskin unissasaarnaamista harjoittivat tuohon aikaan monet muutkin. Häntä seurannutta aatesuuntaa ja liikehdintää sanotaan åkerblomilaisuudeksi. Åkerblomilaisuutta sekä korpelalaisuutta pidetään suomalaisina kristillisperäisinä lahkoina, jotka lienevät lähinnä tuhoisaa kristillistä kulttia.
    ellauri064.html on line 477: Roope Scrooge Ankka (ent. MacAnkka) (12. toukokuuta 1887, Glasgow – 21. tammikuuta 2007, Ankkalinna) oli maailman rikkain henkilö ja Life-lehden listan mukaan Maailman historian suurituloisin, joka ei urallaan tehnyt lahjoituksia (paitsi Yhdysvaltain asevarustamolle). Hän oli myös yksi maailman iäkkäimmistä henkilöistä sekä vanhin elossa ollut sotanorsu ja Hitler. Vuoteen 2020 mennessä hän olisi ollut maailman vanhin ankka. Eikä siinä kaikki! Yhdysvaltalaiset ja englantilaiset tiedemiehet ovat löytäneet 425 miljoonaa vuotta vanhan fossiilin, jolla on maailman vanhin penis. Tälle 5 millimetriä pitkälle oliolle on annettu nimeksi Colymbosathon ecplecticos, joka tarkoittaa ällistyttävää uiveloa, jolla on suuri penis.
    ellauri064.html on line 541: “This is the sort of thing you lifeforms enjoy, is it?”
    ellauri065.html on line 24:

    Jaltan konferenssi

    Sotahistoriaa


    ellauri065.html on line 135: Keski-Euroopan alueelle asettui useita germaanisia heimoja, itään useat erilaiset länslaavilaiset heimot asuivat suurimman osan nykyisen Puolan alueesta 6. vuosisadalta. Duke Mieszko I ja polaanit, hänen linnake Gniezno area eri naapuri heimot toisella puoliskolla 10. vuosisadalla, joka muodostaa ensimmäisen Puolan valtion ja hänestä tuli ensimmäinen historiallisesti kirjattu Piast Duke. Hänen valtakuntansa rajasi Saksan valtiota, ja valvonta rajamailla siirtyisi edestakaisin kahden politiikan välillä tulevina vuosisatoina. Mieszko poika ja seuraaja, Duke Bolesław minä Chrobry, kun 1018 rauhansopimuksen Bautzenin laajeni eteläosassa valtakunnan, mutta menettäneet kontrollin mailla Länsi Pommerin on Itämeren rannikolla. Pakanallisten kapinoiden ja böömiläisen hyökkäyksen jälkeen 1030-luvulla herttua Casimir I Palauttaja (hallitsi 1040-1058) yhdisti jälleen suurimman osan entisestä Piast-alueesta, mukaan lukien Sleesia ja Lubuszin maa keskimmäisen Oderjoen molemmin puolin, mutta ilman Länsi-Pommeria, josta tuli jälleen osa Puolan valtiota Bolesław III Wrymouthin johdolla vuosina 1116–1121, jolloin jalo Griffinsin talo perusti Pommerin herttuakunnan. Bolesławin kuoltua vuonna 1138 Puola oli lähes 200 vuoden ajan pirstoutunut, ja sitä hallitsivat Bolesławin pojat ja heidän seuraajansa, jotka olivat usein ristiriidassa keskenään. Puolan kuninkaaksi vuonna 1320 kruunattu Władysław I Kyynärpäätanko saavutti osittaisen yhdistymisen, vaikka Sleesian ja Masovian herttuakunnat pysyivät itsenäisinä Piast-tiloina.
    ellauri065.html on line 151: Sen jälkeen, kun uusnatsijärjestöksi kutsuttu Saksan kansallinen demokraattinen puolue sai syyskuussa 2006 kuusi paikkaa Mecklenburg-Vorpommernin parlamentissa, puolueen johtaja Udo Voigt ilmoitti, että hänen puolueensa vaatii Saksaa "historiallisilla rajoilla". ja kyseenalaisti nykyiset rajasopimukset.
    ellauri065.html on line 153: Tärkeitä tapahtumia Saksan historiasta ovat taistelut, kuten Frederick Suuren voitot Mollwitzissa vuonna 1741, Hohenfriedberg vuonna 1745, Leuthen (1757) ja Zorndorf (1758) sekä hänen tappiot Gross-Jägersdorfissa vuonna 1757 ja Kunersdorfissa vuonna 1759. Historioitsija Norman Davies kuvailee Kunersdorf nimellä "Preussin suurin katastrofi" ja inspiraation Christian Tiedge n Elegy on 'Ihmiskunta teurasti jonka Harhaluulo alttarille Blood'.
    ellauri065.html on line 165: Väljän alueet Saksan ( saksa : Ehemalige Deutsche Ostgebiete ) ovat ne, maakuntien tai alueiden itään nykyisen itärajan Saksan (jäljempänä Oder-Neisse-linja ), jotka menettivät Saksan jälkeen maailmansodan ja sitten toisen maailmansodan ; on ollut osa Saksan valtakuntaa vuodesta 1871 ja aiemmin Preussista ja Itävallasta. Niihin kuuluu maakuntia, joita on historiallisesti pidetty saksalaisina, ja muita, joista tuli saksalaisia ​​Saksan yhdistymisen jälkeen vuonna 1871.
    ellauri065.html on line 182: This looks like a continuation from Qwe and Qwerty? The admin is the same ... I found the site through a google alert for a band I´m following.
    ellauri065.html on line 198: According to Six, the concept arose from a joke he made with friends about punishing a child molester by stitching his mouth to the anus of a "fat truck driver". Inspiration also came from Nazi medical experiments carried out during World War II, such as the crimes of Josef Mengele at the Auschwitz concentration camp.
    ellauri065.html on line 200: The film received generally mixed reviews from film critics, but it won several accolades at international film festivals. Review aggregator web site Rotten Tomatoes gave the film a 50% approval rating based on 94 reviews, with an average rating of 5.15/10; the general consensus states: "Grotesque, visceral and hard to (ahem) swallow, this surgical horror doesn't quite earn its stripes because the gross-outs overwhelm and devalue everything else."
    ellauri065.html on line 221: Kliban also gives businessmen the cartoon ass-in-the-face--literally, in "Business on Parade," in which men in suits and hats crawl along on all fours, each with his face buried in the rump of the one before him--a daisy chain of brown-nosers, dominance and submission in an endless line.
    ellauri065.html on line 228: Finding himself out of work after film school in 1976, Ferrara directed a pornographic film, 9 Lives of a Wet Pussy, using a pseudonym. Starring with his then-girlfriend, he recalled having to step in front of the camera for one scene to perform in a hardcore sex scene: "It's bad enough paying a guy $200 to fuck your girlfriend, then he can't get it up." Ferrara lives in Rome, Italy. He moved there following the 9/11 attacks because it was easier for him to find financing for his movies in Europe. Ferrara descibes himself as a Buddhist. Because Jesus was a living man, and so were Buddha and Muhammad. These three guys changed the fucking world, with their passion and love of other human beings. All these guys had was their word, and they came from fucking nowhere. I’m not saying Nazareth is nowhere – I’m sure Jesus came from a very cool neighbourhood. Ferrara shows his love for other human beings by making films with a lot of FUCK! FUCK! and KILL! KILL! in them. His love of money is no match for his love of his neighbor primates.
    ellauri065.html on line 335: Kazoin sinäpursosta arvosteluvideon juoxiainen 3:sta. Se oli just niin alaluokkasta kuin saattoi uskoa. Sekä leffa että sen arvio. Tämmöisiä siiroja löytyi poikasena kun käänteli maakiviä. Ja naisvihaa taas, yksi (1) nainen koko rainassa, jonka isoja tissejä voi kuolata ja vetää käteen samalla. She is not treated well. Emmä oikein ymmärrä kuka tämmösestä voi tykätä. Kai sit vaan tää viimeisten aikojen nuoriso on kuin häkkiin suljettuja rottia. Hillottuja klitorixia. We actually see him remove his testicles. Hyi helvetti. Nauraako joku? Kuulinko jonkun edes pyrskähtävän? To the wall with them! Tyypille joka jaxaa kazoa tällästä ja vielä jauhaa siitä sivukaupalla ei kyllä mitään armoa. Juotikas on INHOTTAVA. En jaxanut kazoa loppuun edes sitä "arvostelua".
    ellauri065.html on line 479: Cangaço (Portuguese pronunciation: [kɐ̃ˈɡasu]) was the banditism phenomenon of Northeast Brazil in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This region of Brazil is known for its aridness and hard way of life, and in a form of "social banditry" against the government, many men and women decided to become nomadic bandits, roaming the hinterlands seeking money, food and revenge.
    ellauri065.html on line 494: ponzi Ponzi scheme (/ˈpɒnzi/, Italian: [ˈpontsi]; also a Ponzi game) is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors. The Ponzi scheme was also previously described in novels; Charles Dickens´ 1844 novel Martin Chuzzlewit and his 1857 novel Little Dorrit both feature such a scheme. Mä puhuin Kouvolassa pyramiidiskeemasta, kaikki talouspeikot ja yrittäjät oli noloina. EI SAA SANOA!
    ellauri065.html on line 498: thetan: In Scientology, the concept of the thetan (/ˈθeɪtən/) is similar to the concept of self, or the spirit or soul as found in several belief systems. This similarity is not total, though. The term is derived from the Greek letter Θ, theta, which in Scientology beliefs represents "the source of life, or life itself." In Scientology it is believed that it is the thetan, not the central nervous system, which commands the body through communication points.
    ellauri065.html on line 514: 1. "le ironical" term used alot on 4chan to mock people using maymays (memes) often accompanied by the word "le" for extra effect. 2. a very sweet person who cares about all his close friends and family he may get in trouble a lot but he will never stop caring he is a humble strong and a person who just loves without showing it if you meet an ebin make sure you keep him close he is a good lover and great in bed with a lover take care of any ebin. 3. Someone who is afraid of legit every little frickin´ thing, also known as a wuss or pansy. 4. (Nzadi) (plural mbin) door Synonym: elaŋ.
    ellauri065.html on line 519: Me: damn my husband ebin just put his dick in my pussy hella good
    ellauri065.html on line 577:

    The fact that I am writing about this shows that this was not the perfect crime. The conspiracy was exposed though the conspirators have yet to be caught. My hunch is that it was a small group of colluders who tried to dupe many innocent people. A small size would explain why there are so many eyewitnesses who reported the signs of conspiracy, but we have yet to hear from a whistleblower who admits to being part of the plot. Being the middle or rear part of a human centipede makes whistling kinda hard.
    ellauri065.html on line 580: Biden faces a creepy and slippery customer, especially if he gets inaugurated next month. While Trump may be facing thousands, perhaps millions of plaintiffs in incalculable civil and criminal cases. As these cases work their way slowly through the courts, freed from the rush of meeting stop-Biden deadlines, extensive evidence will be presented and courts will hear long and compelling testimony. All the while, Biden will have to carry on while millions across America think that somebody stole the White House for him. Millions of bucks are not going to save Trump from jail this time. Es schaun aufs Hakenkreuz voll Hoffnung schon Millionen. The knavishness dauert nur noch kurze Zeit.
    ellauri065.html on line 593: Suomessa konservatiivit valittavat esimerkiksi seksin ja miehisyyden puutteesta (Timo Hännikäinen), “länsimaisen kulttuurin” rappiosta (Timo Vihavainen), kasvissyönnistä (Joonas Konstig), feminismistä (Henry Laasanen), sukupuolentutkimuksesta (Marko Hamilo) sekä maahanmuutosta ja islamista (lähes jokainen konservatiivi).
    ellauri065.html on line 633: Groups that particpate are organized vigilante, cult style right-wing hate groups. Unfortunately, to make matters worse these groups are protected by police officers who are actually members of right wing extremist groups. Of coure not all police officers particpate, but rather than expose one of their own officers who are members or know these groups personally, they will remain silent. The officers who do particpate will go as far as making a victim appear insane or mentally ill to shut them up, and destroy that persons credibility so no one will be able to defend themselves. They do this by using the power of law enforcement, and taking a person against thier will, to a hospital that will give them a psychiatric exam. Corupt psychiatrist also lie, and cover up the crime as well. Now that they are powerless,noone will listen. Further destroying the targeted indviduals reputation.
    ellauri065.html on line 635: Bio: I am a victim of Cointelpro/ Organized Gang Stalking in Southern California. This includes Community-based harassment, Group Stalking, Workplace mobbing, Psychological abuse/torture/menticide, sexual harassment, noise harassment, Remote Neural Monitoring, Directed Energy/ EMF weapons, Illegal surveillance in public and private, Illegal entry inside my home and car, Medical and Psychiatric fraud, Vandalism and theft of my personal property, Law Enforcement and local city govt. corruption.
    ellauri066.html on line 38: Vallankumousta ei tullut, mutta yhteiskunta ja yliopisto kyllä muuttuivat. Moni aktivisteista ja radikaaleista on edennyt tieteenalansa huipulle kansainvälisiin tehtäviin, professoreiksi, kansanedustajiksi ja jopa yritysmaailman johtopaikoille. Minusta tuli vain tällänen olkihattuinen kääntäjä. Tutkintojärjestelmä uudistui. Muistan itsekin olleeni mukana filosofisten ja yhteiskuntatieteellisten tutkintojen uudistamistoimikunnan (FYTT) jossakin alajaoksessa pohtimassa taideaineiden tutkintorakennetta. Opintotukeen vaadittiin ja lopulta myös saatiin muutoksia (yhdessä vaiheessa vaadittiin tuhannen markan opintorahaa kaikille, ja sisäpiirin iskulause kuului: ”tonni käteen – känni toteen”). Laitoshallintoonkin saatiin opiskelijaedustus, monen myllerryksen ja takapakin saattelemana tosin. Yliopistohistorian alaviitteeksi jäänee se, kun Helsingin yliopiston päärakennuksen suuri juhlasali täysin organisoidusti ja ilmeisesti ensimmäistä kertaa laitoksen historiassa vallattiin 4. marraskuuta 1976 ja siellä pidettiin puheita läpi yön. Yliopiston johto teki viisaan valinnan eikä kutsunut poliisia tyhjentämään rakennusta, eivätkä valtaajatkaan asettuneet haittamaan yliopiston normaaleja toimintoja – vahtimestariparkojen työvuoroja tietysti lukuun ottamatta.
    ellauri066.html on line 40: Opiskeluko? Elettiin aikaa, jolloin ”ikuinen opiskelija” oli vielä legitiimi käsite (”elinikäinen oppiminen” keksittiin myöhemmin). Etenkin humanistisilla ja valtiotieteellisillä aloilla opiskelu muodosti vain yhden osan ammattiin valmistumista – ammattiin, jota monissa tapauksissa ei ollut olemassakaan, ellei sitä itse luonut. Kaikenlaisesta näennäisesti tuottamattomasta touhuamisesta oli se hyöty, että opittiin elämää, ei koulua varten. Itse päädyin opiskelijajärjestöjen ja osakuntatoiminnan myötä aluksi journalismin saralle, olihan yksi aineistanikin tiedotusoppi. Taidehistoriaa ja Suomen historiaa apuna käyttäen sain ansiotöiden ohessa vähitellen aikaan humanististen tieteiden kandidaatin tutkinnon, ja rakkaus kirjallisuuteen vei minut lopulta varsinaisen elämäntyöni kääntämisen pariin. Vanhoja kalenterimerkintöjä selaillessani saatan harvakseltaan törmätä lakoniseen, mutta paljon puhuvaan lausahdukseen: ”Koko ilta kotona.”
    ellauri066.html on line 155: Hellakoski oli lakannut kirjoittamasta runoutta Jääpeilin jälkeen vuonna 1928. Hellaakoski toimi tämän jälkeen maantiedon ja luonnonhistorian opettajana Tyttönormaalilyseossa. Oppilailtaan hän sai liikanimen Koukku. Nenästä se kai tuli. Hän oli myös Helsingin yliopiston dosentti. Hän harrasti maalausta ja oli erittäin tarkasti perehtynyt taidehistoriaan. Ensimmäisellä Italian-matkallaan hän hämmästytti Italian ja taidehistorian tuntemuksellaan lankonsa Wäinö Aaltosen, joka oli käynyt lukuisia kertoja Italiassa. Yli kymmenen vuotta hän puursi maantiedon ja luonnonhistorian opettajana.
    ellauri066.html on line 216: Puulan järviryhmän kehityshistoria ja Lempin polvet.
    ellauri066.html on line 252: Margaret Atwood first heard "Nolite te bastardes carborundorum" in her childhood Latin classes. Atwood remarked on how "weird" it is that this thing is permanently tattooed on people's bodies. People are a bunch of idiots.
    ellauri066.html on line 256: "The show uses the biblical story of Rachel, the wife of Jacob, who gave him her maid to lay with and impregnate; Rachel would then raise the child as her own. In this show the fertile handmaids perform the same function as Rachel's handmaid, and the commanders' infertile wives perform the same function as Rachel did.
    ellauri066.html on line 257: However, in scripture Rachel became fertile eventually and bore Jacob two biological children, Benjamin and Joseph. This aspect of the story, which is not in the show, actually makes Gilead's handmaid/forced surrogate system seem even more cruel and archaic and emphasizes even more the barbarity and evil of the despotic dogma that is the basis of the theocratic Gilead regime."
    ellauri066.html on line 304: Pynchon tunkee kirjoihinsa koko populääri"kulttuurin", kaikkiin kirjoihin. Kaikista kivintä on kun se tunkee niitä historiallisiin romaaneihinsa. Hauskoja anakronismeja esim. 20-luvun itäeurooppalaisen kemistin nimi on Jamf. Sehän on 60-luvun nekruslangia: “Jamf” equals J-ive A-ss M-other F-ucker. Tai fin de siecle arabi joka ei osaa sanoa ärrää (haha me amerikkalaiset nauretaan noille terroristeille! Je suis Charlie!).
    ellauri066.html on line 348: Tästä tuli hyvä aasinsilta ize niteisiin. Vaikka kirjat on fiktiota (juu on ne), ne on tärkein lähde Pynchonin ymmärtämiseen - sen sisäisen elämään, pakkomielteisiin ja idoleihin. Useimmat lukijat jotka vaan surffaa literäärisiä kiksejä, ei vaivaudu kaivautumaan textin pinnan alle ja haeskelemaan sieltä meduusamaista tekijää. Pygofiilit sen sijaan tykkää tämmösestä pelistä, on fasinoivaa kaivella palapelin paloja ja koota niistä kubistista rintakuvaa the Pynchistä. Joka fiilillä on eri fiilis siitä, ainaskin vähäsen. Mutta muista että kaikki pygofiilit on alottaneet nuubeina, kunnes ovat jääneet koukkuun. Varo paranoidi sinä voit olla seuraava.
    ellauri066.html on line 360: Is Pynchon’s equation of motion a standard differential equation used by specialists to calculate the path of a rocket’s flight or to control its yaw? No: Pynchon’s equation does not resemble anything one might reasonably expect. […] Not only are most of the symbols in Pynchon’s equation obscure, but the general structure of the terms in the equation also makes it impossible to identify with one or other of the equations describing the position and orientation of a rocket in flight. This equation, then, is not a genuine mathematical expression in this context. It may appear authoritative to the layperson, but it is unlikely to fool a rocket scientist. (Schachterle/Aravind, 2001: 162)...
    ellauri066.html on line 366: To shorten a long story of searching for sources: the essay ‘The Control System of the V-2’ by Otto Müller includes an ‘equation for control in yaw’ (Müller, 1957: 90), and in exactly the same notation as Gravity’s Rainbow’s equation ‘describ[ing] motion under the aspect of yaw control’ (GR 284). We can conclude that this is the searched-for template for Pynchon’s Second Equation (see appendix, Figure 8). Müller’s paper is part of History of German Guided Missiles Development by Theodor Benecke and August W. Quick, published in 1957, which is based on the First Guided Missiles Seminar in Munich that took place a year earlier. The seminar was organised by the American Advisory Group for Aeronautical Research and Development (AGARD) to collect information about the V-2 from German scientists and engineers to use in American research on guided missiles. Pynchon might have had access to this book and further material on rocketry in the Boeing Company for which he worked as a technical writer in the early 1960s.
    ellauri066.html on line 368: Moore’s intuition that Pynchon’s Second Equation is real proved to be correct, and he and his colleague correctly assign the angle ϕ to the orientational range of the rocket. But since they did not know that this formula is only one in a set of equations that describe the flight path, the orientation, and the steering of the V-2, the research team was misled in their interpretation of the other parameters and terms. With Müller’s paper, we can finally determine the meaning of each term and compare these with Pynchon’s reading. The first three terms refer, respectively, to the moments of inertia, of air resistance, and of lateral air impact when the rocket yaws, and the term on the right side of the equal sign represents the steering moment of the rudders (Müller, 1957: 90, 91; Kirschstein, 1951: 73, 74). In other words, the left-hand terms describe the orientation of the rocket during flight, which is influenced by external forces such as wind currents and air resistance.
    ellauri066.html on line 430: If you see a train this evening, Jos näet junan illan tullen
    ellauri066.html on line 458: Pynchon Press has been serving Western Massachusetts Businesses with Commercial Printing Services for over 50 years. We have a long standing history as a printer that you can trust in, with deep ties to the community. Print is in our blood. We’ve recently relocated our print shop from our original location in Springfield, MA to a new building on Grattan Street in Chicopee, MA. This new location gives us better capacity to handle your print jobs. We have made considerable investment into digital printing presses which allows us to produce beautifully printed full color print jobs with incredible turn around. Smaller run print jobs for booklets and flyers can be ordered. The days of having to order 1000 of something you only need 100 of are over. If you can design it, we can print it. We’ve been a trusted printer for customers throughout Western Massachusetts and Northern CT. Our quality printing services speak for themselves. When you are looking for a printer for your next print job, contact Pynchon Press, the local printer you can trust your printing to.
    ellauri066.html on line 484: Nemesis (Greek: νέμεσις) is a philosophical term first created by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics. The term means one who feels pain caused by others' undeserved success. It is part of a trio of terms, with epikhairekakia (ἐπιχαιρεκακία ) meaning one who takes pleasure in others' pain, similar to Schadenfreude, and phthonos (φθόνος) meaning one who feels pain caused by any pleasure, deserved or not, similar to envy.[1][2]
    ellauri066.html on line 494: Schadenfreude is a complex emotion where, rather than feeling sympathy, one takes pleasure from watching someone's misfortune. This emotion is displayed more in children than adults. However, adults also experience schadenfreude, although generally they conceal it. [original research?]
    ellauri066.html on line 498: Specifically, for someone with high self-esteem, seeing another person fail may still bring them a small (but effectively negligible) surge of confidence because the observer's high self-esteem significantly lowers the threat they believe the visibly-failing human poses to their status or identity. Since this confident individual perceives that, regardless of circumstances, the successes and failures of the other person will have little impact on their own status or well-being, they have very little emotional investment in how the other person fares, be it positive or negative. Tässä todennäköinen syy mixi anglosaxeilla ei ole sanaa sille, vaan on gloating (quod vide).
    ellauri066.html on line 500: Conversely, for someone with low self-esteem, someone who is more successful poses a threat to their sense of self, and seeing this 'mighty' person fall can be a source of comfort because they perceive a relative improvement in their internal or in-group standing.
    ellauri066.html on line 502: Aggression-based schadenfreude primarily involves group identity. The joy of observing the suffering of others comes from the observer's feeling that the other's failure represents an improvement or validation of their own group's (in-group) status in relation to external (out-groups) groups (see In-group and out-group). This is, essentially, schadenfreude based on group versus group status. Joukkueurheilu on vankka bastioni vahingoniloisuudelle. And the domain of politics is prime territory for feelings of schadenfreude, especially for those who identify strongly with their political party.
    ellauri066.html on line 504: Rivalry-based schadenfreude is individualistic and related to interpersonal competition. It arises from a desire to stand out from and out-perform one's peers. This is schadenfreude based on another person's misfortune eliciting pleasure because the observer now feels better about their personal identity and self-worth, instead of their group identity.
    ellauri066.html on line 516: The Book of Proverbs mentions an emotion similar to schadenfreude: "Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth: Lest the LORD see it, and it displease him, and he turn away his wrath from him." (Proverbs 24:17–18, King James Version). Jutkut on eteviä schadenfreudessa, kun ne on niin usein olleet häviäjiä. Esim The Bob Dylan 1965 song "Like a Rolling Stone" is an expression of schadenfreude in popular culture.[original research?]
    ellauri066.html on line 520: During the seventeenth century, Robert Burton wrote in his work The Anatomy of Melancholy, "Out of these two [the concupiscible and irascible powers] arise those mixed affections and passions of anger, which is a desire of revenge; hatred, which is inveterate anger; zeal, which is offended with him who hurts that he loves; and ἐπιχαιρεκακία, a compound affection of joy and hate, when we rejoice at other men's mischief, and are grieved at their prosperity; pride, self-love, emulation, envy, shame, &c., of which elsewhere."[37]
    ellauri066.html on line 524: Rabbi Harold S. Kushner in his book When Bad Things Happen to Good People describes schadenfreude as a universal, even wholesome reaction that cannot be helped. "There is a German psychological term, Schadenfreude, which refers to the embarrassing reaction of relief we feel when something bad happens to someone else instead of to us." He gives examples and writes, "[People] don't wish their friends ill, but they can’t help feeling an embarrassing spasm of gratitude that [the bad thing] happened to someone else and not to them." onkohan tää rabbi trumpin vävyn setä?
    ellauri066.html on line 530: Researchers expected that the brain's empathy center of subjects would show more stimulation when those seen as "good" got an electric shock, than would occur if the shock was given to someone the subject had reason to consider "bad". This was indeed the case, but for male subjects, the brain's pleasure centers also lit up when someone got a shock that the male thought was "well-deserved".
    ellauri066.html on line 674: WHEN the rest of the world blinked as coronavirus took hold, ice-cool Swede Anders Tegnell refused to lock down his nation.
    ellauri066.html on line 675: As Sweden’s death count spiralled last spring at one of the highest global rates, this once faceless scientist was accused of creating a “pariah state”.
    ellauri066.html on line 685: For it appears his decision not to lock down may have paid off.
    ellauri066.html on line 730: Junior doctor Sebastian Rushworth, 37, tells me he hasn’t seen a Covid patient on his emergency ward in two months.
    ellauri066.html on line 750: Critics say this alone is evidence that Sweden’s strategy was wrong.
    ellauri066.html on line 756: For many of his countrymen, Tegnell is a cult hero.
    ellauri066.html on line 899: “The Swedish government decided early, in January, that the measures we should take against the pandemic should be evidence-based. And when you start looking around at the measures that are being taken now by other countries, you find that very few of them have a shred of evidence.” Tegnell said that he had been in close contact with his counterparts in the United Kingdom, who were planning similarly light restrictions. But cases in the U.K. were increasing rapidly.
    ellauri066.html on line 902: On March 16th, scientists at Imperial College London published a paper, based on an epidemiological model, predicting that, unless some form of lockdown was imposed, more than five hundred thousand Brits would die from preventable COVID-19 infections. A week later, the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, announced that his government would be closing schools, bars, and restaurants, falling in step with the rest of Europe. “It was slightly frustrating,” Tegnell told me, when I spoke to him, in August. “We were really hoping we could take us through this crisis together.”
    ellauri066.html on line 905: “It just kept adding up,” Tegnell said. “I mean, you’re always kind of hopeful and think that, O.K., this is something that’s going to pass over.” Soon, the per-capita death toll was among the highest in Europe.
    ellauri066.html on line 906: Tegnell told me that the death toll weighed on him. “I think this was a big frustration and feeling of failure for us,” he said. But he remained steadfast, often saying, in interviews, “Judge me in a year.”
    ellauri066.html on line 910: She wrote to me to say that Tegnell and his colleagues “have acted too late and too little which has led to over 12000 people premature death including my husband. He would have lived without Corona!”
    ellauri066.html on line 912: Nanaz Fassih, another hairy arms, a fifty-two-year-old pediatric nurse, was skeptical of the Swedish response from the beginning; she tried to wear a mask to work in hospitals and clinics, but was told that this was not allowed. (Today, masks are more commonly allowed in Swedish hospitals.)
    ellauri066.html on line 914: “I think we are reasonably optimistic,” Tegnell said last August. “Our prognosis is, No, we don’t really see a huge second wave coming on.” This did not last. By December, cases and hospitalizations were higher than they’d been since the earliest days of the pandemic. Intensive-care units in Stockholm and Malmö, the country’s third biggest city, were full. “It was just this development we did not want to see,” Björn Eriksson, Stockholm’s director of health and medical care, said during a press conference.
    ellauri066.html on line 925: It’s not as bad as Italy, Spain, the U.K., and Belgium for example.” says Tegnell holding up his statistic when defending his strategy, claiming that sparsely-populated Norway and Finland are the outliers, and that Sweden should be compared to the rest of Europe. Sweden has a larger foreign-born population than other Nordic countries, and its population is more concentrated in urban areas, Tegnell claims. Yes, blame the hairy arms.
    ellauri066.html on line 927: Other experts are skeptical of this argument. “I find no correlation between proportion of foreign-born and Covid death rate,” Heuveline wrote, in an e-mail. “Norway has a higher proportion of foreign-born than Denmark, which has about the same proportion as Italy (about 10%), but Covid-19 mortality is much higher in Italy than in Denmark, and higher in Denmark than in Norway.”
    ellauri066.html on line 930: And now some candy for the other side, this is New Yorker after all.
    ellauri066.html on line 931: In a recent piece for this magazine, Siddhartha noted that, while some countries were ravaged by the pandemic, others had far lower death rates than expected. The reasons for this, he noted, remain an “epidemiological mystery.” Its a miracle!
    ellauri066.html on line 936: Almost exactly a year from the pandemic’s start, Tegnell said that he believes people should still hold off on judging his policies. “The pandemic is not over,” he said. “Any kind of final review on what’s been good and what’s been bad still awaits us.” Thats what the guys in Nuremberg said: hold your horses, this was supposed to be a 1000-year Reich. Don't blame us on what were only meant as initial experiments.
    ellauri066.html on line 938: On the lighter side, the pandemic has presented many companies with an unprecedented opportunity. This includes the mecidine, mask and mortuary business. But also small-time Finnish serial entrepreneurs named "Jyri" and the producers of little ketchup satchets.
    ellauri066.html on line 947: Helene84: It's far too early to be making pronouncements like this.

    ellauri066.html on line 948: BLUEWIN; . . . you should know better . . . its way to early to make any kind of conclusions . . . maybe by this time next year we will have a good idea of the winners and losers . . . until then you are just stoking the fire . . .
    ellauri067.html on line 38: Sain koronan sulkemasta kirjastosta herätelainana jäljittelemättömän Tommi Kinnusen lukuromaanin Pintti. Plintti oli käsineidon tapainen apupoika Marjatta Kurenniemen teoxessa Puuhiset. Se paljastui (Hui! juonipaljastus!) loppupeleissä puuhisten kuninkaan pojaxi, joka ei osannut sanoa ärrää eikä ässää. Plintti < kr. plinthos 'tiiliskivi' voisi tarkoittaa myös jalustaa.
    ellauri067.html on line 46: Nyt alkaa selvitä! Pintti on jotain jota mänkkiin pitää sekoittaa. Sitä ei kaikki tiedäkään. Ollaan lasitehdasmiljöössä. Tommi tekee hyvin tarkkaa esiselvitystyötä jokaiseen kirjaansa. Ne on vähän kuin lähihistoriallisia romaaneja. Juu, pintti on lasinpuhalluxessa syntynyttä rikkinäistä jätelasia (s. 20). Runoilijasiskoa harmitti, että Tommi ehti julkaista lasitehdasmiljöökirjan ensixi. Muakin vitutti se Jiipekka Mäkelän turaus Hunanin lähetyssaarnaajista. Vaikka siinä oli vaan se ämmä vasta jostain 30-luvulta. Silti vittu. Noita Mäkeliä on satusetiä kuin salpausselällä.
    ellauri067.html on line 75: Jos pidit tästä voisit pitää myös näistä: Tommi Kinnunen ei kertonut katuvansa, Hyvän historia kovakantinen, Mauri Kunnas Joulupukin joululoma, äänikirja kovakantinen. Suomalainen.com. Helposti sulavaa? Se selviää vain sulattamalla. Euroa 29.95. Heti saatavana sähköpostissa elektronisena tuotteena.
    ellauri067.html on line 91: silloin kun joku plärän talousliberaaleista setämiehistä astuu klaveeriin niin kovasti
    ellauri067.html on line 154: During his stay at Fort Bliss, von Braun proposed marriage to Maria Luise von Quistorp (born June 10, 1928), his maternal first cousin, in a letter to his father. He married her in a Lutheran church in Landshut, Germany on 1 March 1947, having received permission to go back to Germany and return with his bride. He was 35 and his new bride was 18. Shortly after, he became an evangelical Christian. He returned to New York on 26 March 1947, with his wife, father, and mother. On 8 December 1948, the von Brauns´ first daughter Iris Careen was born at Fort Bliss Army Hospital.
    ellauri067.html on line 158: von Braun's use of forced labor at Mittelwerk intensified again in 1984 when Arthur Rudolph, one of his top affiliates from the A-4/V2 through the Apollo projects, left the United States and was forced to renounce his citizenship in place of the alternative of being tried for war crimes.
    ellauri067.html on line 163: Von Braun justified the expenses for manned operations with the following argument: "I think somehow space flights for the first time give mankind a chance to become immortal. Once this earth will no longer be able to support life we can emigrate to other places which are better suited for our life."
    ellauri067.html on line 164: His gravestone cites Psalm 19:1: "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork".
    ellauri067.html on line 233: American literary critic Harold Bloom named him as one of the four major American novelists of his time, along with Don DeLillo, Philip Roth, and Cormac McCarthy. Kekä toi Cormac on? For that matter, who is Harold Bloom?
    ellauri067.html on line 241: Harold Bloom was an American literary critic and the Sterling Professor of Humanities at Yale University. Since the publication of his first book in 1959, Bloom has written more than forty books of literary criticism, several books discussing religion, and one novel. He edited hundreds of anthologies.
    ellauri067.html on line 279: Alkuun hän kirjoitti merirosvoromaaneja, sitten historiallisia jännityskertomuksia. Sue aloitti Ranskassa lehdissä julkaistujen jatkoromaanien perinteen. Hänen tunnetuin teoksensa on Vaeltava juutalainen (Le Juif errant), jossa hän hyödyntää Ahasveruksen tarinaa.
    ellauri067.html on line 285: Novi Pazar "uusi basaari" on kaupunki Serbian historiallisen Sandžakin alueella. Kaupunki on perustettu vuonna 1460 ja sen asukasluku oli vuonna 2011 100 410. Sandžak on osmannien maakunta (myöhemmin vilayet).
    ellauri067.html on line 298: Called today "the Father of Connecticut", Rev. Thomas Hooker was a towering figure in the early development of colonial New England. He was one of the great preachers of his time, an erudite writer on Christian subjects, the first minister of Cambridge, Massachusetts, one of the first settlers and founders of both the city of Hartford and the state of Connecticut.
    ellauri067.html on line 300: His leadership of Puritan sympathizers brought him a summons to the Court of High Commission. Forfeiting his bond, Hooker fled to Rotterdam in the Netherlands, and considered a position in the English Reformed Church, Amsterdam, as assistant to its senior pastor, the Rev. John Paget. From the Netherlands, after a clandestine trip to England to put his affairs in order, he immigrated to the Massachusetts Bay Colony aboard the Griffin.
    ellauri067.html on line 319: “More Ouspenskian nonsense,” whispers a lady brushing by on the arm of a dock worker. Proverbs for Paranoids.
    ellauri067.html on line 338: During the final years of his radio show, Fred Allen suffered two declines. One decline in his program's ratings and an unfortunate decline in his health.
    ellauri067.html on line 339: Allen's health worsened further during his time on What´s My Line? and on March 17, 1956 while strolling down the streets of New York City, he suffered a heart attack and died at the age of 61. Fred Allenia löytyy valmiixinaurettuna sinäputkilosta. Sietämätöntä kaakatusta, puujalkapuisevaa. Fred ei koskaan päässyt televisioon. Tompan maalmansota meni radiota kuunnellessa. Tätä bullshittiä ei takuulla tullut BBC:stä 40-luvulla.
    ellauri067.html on line 345: Cherokee Ray Noble and his orchestra 1938. Hips hips jumputi jumputi piipatipaa jazzikappale Tompan yläkouluajoilta.
    ellauri067.html on line 363: Foil: In fiction or non-fiction, a foil is a character who contrasts with another character; most of the time it is the protagonist, to highlight qualities of the other character. In some cases, a subplot can be used as a foil to the main plot. This is especially true in the case of metafiction and the story within a story motif. The word foil comes from the old practice of backing gems with foil to make them shine more brightly. Paranoids like Pynchon make foil hats to foil conspiracies.
    ellauri067.html on line 384: What Does the Triskelion Symbol Mean? Derived from the Greek word "Triskeles" meaning "three legs", the Triskele or Triple Spiral is a complex ancient Celtic symbol. Often referred to by many as a Triskelion, its earliest creation dates back to the Neolithic era, as it can be seen at the entrance of Newgrange, Ireland. The Triskele gained popularity in its use within the Celtic culture from 500BC onwards. This archaic symbol is one of the most convoluted to decipher as symbolists believe it is reflective of many areas of culture from the time. Huoh. Vitun symbolistit. Seinän töhrijät. Nuijia. Kirkkovene ja Jallu luuraa on selkeämpiä.
    ellauri067.html on line 387: He arrives at an airport where he saves the life of mechanic Tank Tinker, who became his friend and companion. Tank gives Harrigan his nickname when he said, "Some hop, Harrigan."
    ellauri067.html on line 406: The Latin phrase that renders, rather loosely, the Greek phrase "ἐν τούτῳ νίκα", transliterated as "en toútōi níka" (Ancient Greek: [en túːtɔːi̯ níːkaː], Modern Greek: [en ˈtuto ˈnika]), literally meaning "in this win".
    ellauri067.html on line 422: Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing (1840–1902; full name Richard Fridolin Joseph Freiherr Krafft von Festenberg auf Frohnberg, genannt von Ebing) was an Austro–German psychiatrist and author of the foundational work Psychopathia Sexualis (1886). He died in Graz in 1902. He was recognized as an authority on deviant sexual behavior and its medicolegal aspects. Krafft-Ebing´s principal work is Psychopathia Sexualis: eine Klinisch-Forensische Studie (Sexual Psychopathy: A Clinical-Forensic Study), which was first published in 1886 and expanded in subsequent editions. The last edition from the hand of the author (the twelfth) contained a total of 238 case histories of human sexual behaviour. Translations of various editions of this book introduced to English such terms as "sadist" (derived from the brutal sexual practices depicted in the novels of the Marquis de Sade), "masochist", (derived from the name of Leopold von Sacher-Masoch), "homosexuality", "bisexuality", "necrophilia", and "anilingus".
    ellauri067.html on line 428: Freud´s didactic strategy in his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality was to construct a bridge between the "perversions" and "normal" sexuality. Clinically exploring "a richly diversified collection of erotic endowments and inclinations: hermaphroditism, pedophilia, sodomy, fetishism, exhibitionism, sadism, masochism, coprophilia, necrophilia" among them, Freud concluded that "all humans are innately perverse". He found the roots of such perversions in infantile sexuality—in the child´s "polymorphously perverse" inclinations ... the "aptitude" for such perversity is innate.
    ellauri067.html on line 439: How much, or how little influence drugs, particularly hallucigenic drugs like lysergic acid diethylamide, LSD, had on Pynchon’s narrative is unknown. If Siegel, however, is to be believed, and he should be despite any resentment he felt regarding Pynchon’s affair with his wife, then the writing of Gravity’s Rainbow was heavily influenced by drugs. In Pynchon’s most famous quote regarding this particular novel, which is notoriously difficult to interpret, he is alleged to have told Siegel,
    ellauri067.html on line 457: Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson was criticized this week after claiming on Christmas Eve that Rudolph, the fictional red-nosed reindeer who leads Santa Claus’s sleigh, has been “misgendered.”
    ellauri067.html on line 458: Neil deGrasse Tyson is speaking up on Christmas 2020, in order to correct a little scientific inaccuracy that Santa Claus has been perpetuating for years. We all know the story of Santa and his reindeer (Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, and of course Rudolph), but [...]
    ellauri067.html on line 461: He continued, “So Santa´s reindeer, which all sport antlers, are therefore all female, which means Rudolf has been misgendered.” Tyson’s message triggered swift criticism, which included accusations that Tyson was “ruining things that are supposed to be fun.” “Why ruin this magic for children with your reddit-tier haha i’m so smart bulls***, this isn’t funny, you aren’t clever, and nobody cares, let them have this magic in their lives, you sound like an adolescent,” another person said. “They’re magic reindeer a**hole. The normal rules don’t apply. Quit trying to s*** on Christmas,” one person replied.
    ellauri067.html on line 463: tannäuserism: In a note to 3.2 of Gravity´s Rainbow, Heseburger explains Pynchon´s use of the word "Tannhäuserism" as follows: The tragic error of Tannhäuser — for example, in Richard Wagner´s operatic version of the myth — was to postpone his quest in order to linger for one year of sensual, "mindless pleasure" with the goddess Venus under her mountain called Venusberg. Vai onko se Brocken, Jaakon ja Jöötin mainizema Kyöpelinvuori Harzissa? On 11 April, American forces liberated the camps at Buchenwald, near Weimar, and the V2 rocket slave-labour camp at Nordhausen in the Harz Mountains. Ryssät eivät päässeet lähellekään. Jenkeillä oli vitun kiire kahmimaan izelleen ne raketit. Ja siitä vasta iso piru pääsi merrasta.
    ellauri067.html on line 467: Franz von Bayros (28 May 1866 – 3 April 1924) was an Austrian commercial artist, illustrator, and painter, best known for his controversial Tales at the Dressing Table portfolio. He belonged to the Decadent movement in art, often utilizing erotic themes and phantasmagoric imagery. His work can be found at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. He drew over 2000 illustrations in total. Bayros piirsi eri paljon porsliinipilluja. Sanalla sanoen, pornokuvia.
    ellauri067.html on line 470: The relationship between J.P. Morgan and Thomas Edison is a classic case of high finance. As Edison needed money to fund his work he would give a huge block of stock in his company to Morgan. Eventually the bulk of Edison Electric shares were controlled by the J.P. Morgan.
    ellauri067.html on line 473: The first residential house in America to be electrified was J.P. Morgan’s. The work was done by Thomas Edison. So how did Morgan say thanks to the guy who gave him the first home in America with electricity? He screwed Thomas Edison out of his own company. Welcome to the game of 1890s venture capital.
    ellauri067.html on line 491: There’s a dirty secret tucked away in Thomas Pynchon’s novels, eand it’s this: beyond all the postmodernism and paranoia, the anarchism and socialism, the investigations into global power, the forays into labor politics and feminism and critical race theory, the rocket science, the fourth-dimensional mathematics, the philatelic conspiracies, the ’60s radicalism and everything else that has spawned 70 or 80 monographs, probably twice as many dissertations, and hundreds if not thousands of scholarly essays, his novels are full of cheesy love stories.
    ellauri067.html on line 493: Book reviewers have a long history of attacking Pynchon for his flat characters. Roger and Jessica are susceptible to this criticism. Neither is given much of a history. We don’t know where they grew up or who their parents were. This is one of the great failings of... what to call it? "middlebrow" is antiquated... anyway, a very common kind of criticism (common in the Anglo-American world, anyway), and it affects how authors write (which is one reason I read mainly Russian literature these days). I don't need to know "where they grew up or who their parents were" and I don't much care, unless, of course, you write about it brilliantly because that´s truly what you want to focus on, as opposed to "welp, better provide a plausible background for my characters so the reader will believe they're behaving this way." Just write good sentences in a good and surprising order. Two people have fallen out of love? I don't care if it's because one of them has mommy issues or the other was bullied as a child—people fall out of love all the time, for any reason or none, just tell me what they do about it, and in language that makes me want to keep reading! Teoxet on tärkeät, vähät elämästä. En jaxa luontokuvauxia, hyppään ne heti yli.
    ellauri067.html on line 500: ...The first piece to provide substantial information about Pynchon´s personal life was a biographical account written by a former Cornell University friend, Jules Siegel, and published in Playboy magazine. In his article, Siegel reveals that Pynchon had a complex about his teeth and underwent extensive and painful reconstructive surgery, was nicknamed "Tom" at Cornell and attended Mass diligently, acted as best man at Siegel's wedding, and that he later also had an affair with Siegel's wife. Siegel recalls Pynchon saying he did attend some of Vladimir Nabokov's lectures at Cornell but that he could hardly make out what Nabokov was saying because of his thick Russian accent. Siegel also records Pynchon's commenting: "Every weirdo in the world is on my wavelength", an observation borne out by the crankiness and zealotry that has attached itself to his name and work in subsequent years.
    ellauri067.html on line 502: Pynchon´s early story Low-lands contains general immaturity, and racist, sexist and proto-Fascist talk. It´s his own voice in Pig Bodine, a notoriously bigoted and asinine sailor who recurs in later novels. The claims of racism and proto-Fascism are hardly substantiated, while the misogyny is pervasive. Women are considered as semi-inanimate objects upon which men have a right (or even a duty) of possession, imposition or defilation.
    ellauri067.html on line 505: ...the women in the class were furious at the books by men. My choices were quite ordinary—Kerouac, Ellison, Roth, Bellow, and Pynchon... “This Set of Holes, Pleasantly Framed”: Pynchon the Competent Pornographer.
    ellauri067.html on line 530: In the Mid. Dutch poem of Lantslot ende Sandrii), a knight says to his maiden : ic heb u liever dan en everswin, al waert van finen goude gkewrackt, I hold you dearer than a boar- swine, all were it of fine gold y-wrought ; were they still in the habit of making gold jewels in the shape of boars ? at least the remembrance of such a thing was not yet lost.
    ellauri067.html on line 545: "This same secret knowledge is what I craved as a young student, believing that there was a meaning to the world beyond all our everyday transactions."
    ellauri067.html on line 547:

    This is a profoundly dumb and misguided roaming-junior-male-ape-gang roadmovie type of thought. Damn wagnerian homoerotic Quest for a Holy Grail. Murder mysteries. Spoilers. "Nyaah we already got the Grail!" taunt the French knights Arthur & co. in Monty Python´s Holy Grail:
    ellauri067.html on line 560: "I thought I was sophisticating the Beat spirit with secondhand science", said Pynchon. Which stands as a pretty good description of some of his novels, too.
    ellauri067.html on line 566: "his batman, a Corporal Wayne" [Batman's "real-world" identity was Bruce Wayne], 11; comicbook fangs, 21; Sir Denis Nayland Smith, 83, 277-78, 592, 631, 751; Hop Harrigan, Tank Tinker, 117; "old-fashioned comical room" 122; Dumbo, 135; Donald Duck, 146; Hansel and Gretel, 174; "comic-book colors" 186; "paint FUCK YOU in a balloon coming out the mouth of one of those little pink shepherdesses" 203; Plasticman, 206, 314, 331, 752; "he passes into a bickering of canary-yellow Borsalini, corksoled comicbook shoes with enormous round toes" 254; "this cartoon here" 263; "a Sunday-funnies dawn" 295; Rocketman, 366, 376, 379, 436, 512, 596; Captain Midnight Show, 375; Green Hornet, 376; "the only beings who can violate their space are safely caught and paralyzed in comic books" 379; Mickey Mouse, 392; Sundial, 472; Wilhelm Busch (cartoonist), 501; Porky Pig, 545; "comic technocracy" 579; "comic-book cats dogs and mice" 586; Bugs Bunny, 592; "comicbook-orange chunks of island" 634; Porky Pig tattoo, 638 (on Osbie Feel's stomach), 711 (on André Omnopon´s stomach); Robin Hood, 664; Mary Marvel, Wonder Woman, 676; comic-book Kamikazes, 680; "down comes a comic-book guillotine on one black & white politician" 687; Crime Does Not Pay, 709; Superman, 751; The Lone Ranger & Tonto, 752; Philip Marlowe, 752; Submariner, 752; Jimmy Olson, 752; See also Byron the Bulb; Floundering Four; Komical Kamikazes; Plasticman; film/cinema references.
    ellauri067.html on line 577: Prokosch was born in Madison, Wisconsin, into an intellectual family that travelled widely. His father, Eduard Prokosch, an Austrian immigrant, was Professor of Germanic Languages at Yale University at the time of his death in 1938. Prokosch was graduated from Haverford College in 1925 and received a Ph.D. in English in 1932 from Yale University. In his youth, he was an accomplished squash racquets player; he represented the Yale Club in the 1937 New York State squash racquets championship. He won the squash-racquets championship of France in 1938.
    ellauri067.html on line 579: During World War II, Prokosch was a cultural attaché at the American Legation in Sweden. He spent most of the remainder of his life in Europe, where he led a peripatetic existence. His interests were sports (tennis and squash), lepidoptery, and the printing of limited editions of poems that he admired.
    ellauri067.html on line 581: From early on, Prokosch sought to surround himself with a veil of mystification and cast his life into a hopeless riddle. Approaching his sixtieth year, he boasted that no person had succeeded in knowing him as an integral personality: "I have spent my life alone, utterly alone, and no biography of me could ever more than scratch the surface. All the facts in Who’s Who, or whatever, are so utterly meaningless. My real life (if I ever dared to write it!) has transpired in darkness, secrecy, fleeting contacts and incommunicable delights, any number of strange picaresque escapades and even crimes, and I don't think that any of my 'friends' have even the faintest notion of what I'm really like or have any idea of what my life has really consisted of. . . .With all the surface 'respectability,' diplomatic and scholarly and illustrious social contacts, my real life has been subversive, anarchic, vicious, lonely, and capricious."
    ellauri067.html on line 583: The publication of Voices: A Memoir in 1983, advertised as a record of his encounters with some of the century´s leading artists and writers, returned Prokosch to the limelight. His early novels The Asiatics and The Seven Who Fled were reissued to much public acclaim. In 2010, Voices was shown to be almost wholly fictitious and part of an enormous hoax.
    ellauri067.html on line 626: Blicero esiintyi eka kerran Pynchonin 1963 esikoisessa V, nimellä luti Weissmann, dekadentti Sachsan armeijan lupseeri joka oli jäänyt rannalle entiseen Lounais-Afrikkaan presidentti Ahtishaaren kanssa 7v sen jälkeen kun se lakkasi olemasta Saksan siirtomaa. Tässä aiemmassa novellissa se oli mystinen, väliin transu hahmo jolla näytti olleen sadomasokistinen suhde saxalaiseen agenttiin Vera Meroveringiin. Se on kiero myös, ja kenties huumaa ja sitten pöllii jotakin toiselta hahmolta, Kurt Mondaugenilta. Se on enempi hassu kuin huolestuttava, eikä vielä täysimittainen pahis.
    ellauri069.html on line 40: Postmodernism is the Swiss Army knife of critical concepts. It’s definitionally overloaded, and it can do almost any job you need done. This is partly because, like many terms that begin with “post,” it is fundamentally ambidextrous. Postmodernism can mean, “We’re all modernists now. Modernism has won.” Or it can mean, “No one can be a modernist anymore. Modernism is over.” People who use “postmodernism” in the first, “mission accomplished,” sense believe that modernism—the art and literature associated with figures like Picasso and Joyce—changed the game completely, and that everyone is still working through the consequences. Modernism is the song that never ends. Being postmodernist just means that we can never be pre-modernist again. People who use it in the second sense, as the epitaph for modernism, think that, somewhere along the line, there was a break with the assumptions, practices, and ambitions of modernist art and literature, and that everyone since then is (or ought to be) on to something very different. Being postmodernist means that we can never be modernist again.
    ellauri069.html on line 42: Modern art didn’t abandon the world, but it made art-making part of the subject matter of art. When (in the second account) did a break occur? It happened when artists and intellectuals stopped respecting a bright-line distinction between high art and commercial culture. Modernist art and literature, in this version of the story, depended on that distinction to give its products critical authority. Modernism was formally difficult and intellectually challenging. Its thrills were not cheap. But there were cheap thrills out there, a vast and growing mass of products manufactured to stroke the senses and flatter the self-images of their consumers. This bubble-gum culture wasn’t just averse to the spirit of high art. It was high art’s reason for being.
    ellauri069.html on line 54: Barthelme was a Texan. He grew up in Houston, where his father, also named Donald, was a prominent local architect. Donald the writer was the first of five children. Four were boys, and three of them became professional writers.
    ellauri069.html on line 56: The one who kept them all on guard was the father, and he seems to have been a piece of work. Donald, Sr., had studied architecture at Penn, and he was a committed modernist, an acolyte of Setä Mies, Le Corbusier, Saara Aalto, and Esa Saarinen. He designed his own home, including the interiors, and if he couldn’t find something that suited his taste—a rug or a piece of furniture—he manufactured it himself.
    ellauri069.html on line 59: Barthelmes were Catholics; some lapsed, some not, and then to the University of Houston, where his father was a professor in the architecture department, but from which he dropped out.
    ellauri069.html on line 61: An uncompromising temper appears to have limited the father’s career as an architect. The brothers describe a scene in which their father picks up an LP record that says “unbreakable” on the label and breaks it in two. “Not unbreakable,” he says. That might be a little scary for kids to watch. Frederick and Steven thought that he was an ingenious man, but they found him fascinatingly difficult to care for in his old age.
    ellauri069.html on line 63: "My father regards the tray of pink cupcakes. Then he jams his thumb into each cupcake, into the top. Cupcake by cupcake. A thick smile spreads over the face of each cupcake." —Views of My Father Weeping (1969)
    ellauri069.html on line 67: Their memoir is an attempt to understand their gambling obsession as a way of coping with guilt over his death. “The addiction to gambling, with the unsuccessful struggles to break the habit and the opportunities it affords for self-punishment, is a repetition of the compulsion to masturbate,” Freud says in “Dostoevsky and Parricide”; “the relation between efforts to suppress it and fear of the father are too well known to need more than a mention.” No one believes Freud anymore, of course. A great deal of his writing is, at one level of explicitness or another, about the authority of fathers and the struggle for autonomy. (And Barthelme was a close reader of Freud.)
    ellauri069.html on line 71: He was an adept of irony and deflection in person as well as on the page, a lonely and, at some level, unhappy man who needed humor and companionship. But he had, his friend Pynchon told Daugherty, “a hopeful and unbitter heart.” Women seem to have found him easy to like. He married four times and had at least two long-term relationships between the marriages. He was dependent on alcohol, and he was dependent on work. He wrote every morning and had his first drink around noon.
    ellauri069.html on line 76: A couple of years after Barthelme took the apartment, the writer Kirkpatrick Sale and his wife, Faith, an editor, moved in downstairs and became close friends. They had been students at Cornell with Pynchon, and Pynchon would write part of “Gravity’s Rainbow” (1973) in their apartment.
    ellauri069.html on line 78: What was he doing? Daugherty is right to claim that Barthelme conceived of himself as an heir of the modernist tradition—in particular, of Beckett. He encountered Beckett’s work for the first time in 1956, when he picked up a copy of Theatre Arts at Guy’s Newsstand, in Houston, and read the text of “Waiting for Godot.” “It seemed that from the day he discovered ‘Godot,’ Don believed he could write the fiction he imagined,” the woman who was his wife at the time, Helen Moore Barthelme, says in her memoir, “Donald Barthelme: The Genesis of a Cool Sound” (2001).
    ellauri069.html on line 89: Barthelme believed himself to be working in the tradition of Joyce and Samuel Beckett, and that his appropriation of popular, commercial, and other sub-artistic elements (instruction manuals, travel guides, advertisements, sentences from newspaper articles, and so on) in his writing was done as a means of making literature, not subverting it or announcing its obsolescence. Daugherty thinks that many people have got Barthelme wrong.
    ellauri069.html on line 91: Barthelme incorporates bits from other people’s texts into his stories, and a good deal of his writing sounds like (and some of it plainly is) pastiche, as though it had been composed in the style, or spoken in the voice, of someone else.
    ellauri069.html on line 93: It can certainly look, in short, as though Barthelme, like Warhol, were simply dropping the question of whether something counts as literature or not, since markers of the literary are impossible to find in his writing. The high-art traditionalist has no place to hang his beret. Daugherty’s purpose is to convince us that this was not Barthelme’s intention.
    ellauri069.html on line 127: Sidney Joseph "S.J." Perelman (February 1, 1904 – October 17, 1979) was an American humorist and screenwriter. He is best known for his humorous short pieces written over many years for The New Yorker. He also wrote for several other magazines, including Jude, as well as books, scripts, and screenplays. Perelman received an Academy Award for screenwriting in 1956.
    ellauri069.html on line 142: An English illustrator, Beardsley is known for his (often erotically charged) illustrations for Oscar Wilde's Salome, Alexander Pope's Rape of the Lock and other black-and-white works. Along with Oscar Wilde, he was considered a leader of "The Decadents" of the 1890s; 71; 634; Wikipedia entry.
    ellauri069.html on line 157: 16; In palmistry, this cross is found beneath the middle finger between the head and heart lines and shows a distinct interest in occult matters.
    ellauri069.html on line 168: Not the Martyr of Canterbury but a town in Massachusetts nearly destroyed by a flood in 1927. This is another reference from The Berkshire Hills.
    ellauri069.html on line 172: Gene Krupa: Eugene Bertram Krupa, Born:January 15, 1909, Chicago, Illinois, U.S., Died:October 16, 1973, Yonkers, New York, U.S. was an American jazz drummer, band leader and composer known for his energetic style and showmanship. His drum solo on "Sing, Sing, Sing" elevated the role of the drummer from an accompanying line to an important solo voice in the band.
    ellauri069.html on line 178: Hoagy Carmichael: Hoagland Howard " Hoagy " Carmichael (November 22, 1899 - December 27, 1981) was an American singer, songwriter, and actor. American composer and author Alec Wilder described Carmichael as the "most talented, inventive, sophisticated and jazz-oriented of all the great craftsmen" of pop songs in the first half of the 20th century.
    ellauri069.html on line 195: Run between the raindrops: This is a military, combat slang phrase meaning to maneuver under heavy fire without being hit. Ei pidä sekoittaa kappaleeseen Guy Lombardo and His Royal Canadians: Run Raindrop Run 1939.
    ellauri069.html on line 201: Béla Ferenc Dezső Blaskó (Hungarian: [ˈbeːlɒ ˈfɛrɛnt͡s ˈdɛʒøː ˈblɒʃkoː]; 20 October 1882 – 16 August 1956), known professionally as Bela Lugosi (/ləˈɡoʊsi/; Hungarian: [ˈluɡoʃi]), was a Hungarian-American actor best remembered for portraying Count Dracula in the 1931 film and for his roles in other horror films. Belasta tuli morfiiniaddikti ja se vajosi B-filmeistä Ö-mappiin. 5x naimisissa, tulos 1 poika.
    ellauri069.html on line 203: Gerard Swope (December 1, 1872 – November 20, 1957) was a U.S. electronics businessman. He served as the president of General Electric Company between 1922 and 1940, and again from 1942 until 1945. During this time Swope expanded GE's product offerings, reorienting GE toward consumer home appliances, and offering consumer credit services. Swope was born in St. Louis, Missouri, to Ida and Isaac Swope, Jewish immigrants from Germany. He graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1895.
    ellauri069.html on line 222: Richard Fariña, to whom Gravity's Rainbow is dedicated, was a good friend of Pynchon's when they were students at Cornell University in the 50s. In 1963, Farina married Mimi Baez, a folksinger and sister of Joan Baez. Although first married under the Napoleonic Code in a secret ceremony in Paris in the spring of 1963, they had an official marriage in Carmel, California, for the benefit of the Baez family. Pynchon was the best man for the Carmel ceremony, coming up from Mexico City where he was living and working on Gravity's Rainbow. In A Long Time Coming and a Long Time Gone, Farina's posthumously published collection of stories (Random House, 1969), Farina describes his and Pynchon's visit to the Monterey Fair. Richard and Mimi Farina formed a folk-music duo (Farina on guitar and Mimi on dulcimer, both singing) and released several albums in the 60s. Richard Farina was killed in a motorcycle crash following a book signing in Carmel for his newly published first (and only) novel, Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up To Me (Random House, 1966). You might want to visit this sweet website dedicated to the memory of Richard and Mimi (who died of cancer in 2001).
    ellauri069.html on line 224: Fisk, Jubilee Jim (1834-1872) 285; Known popularly as the "Barnum of Wall Street" and "Jubilee Jim," Fisk was one of the most outrageous figures of the Gilded Age. The most notorious plot of Fisk's short career was the attempt to corner the gold market during 1868 and 1869. Fisk's and Jay Gould's effort collapsed when President U.S. Grant intervened to halt the Black Friday scandal. Fisk brazenly refused to honor his contracts, leaving thousands ruined.
    ellauri069.html on line 257: German novelist Hermann Hesse (1877-1962), experiencing a crisis of the spirit, had psychoanalysis with J.B. Lang, a disciple of Carl Gustav Jung. His novel Demian (1919), which shows the influence of analysis, is about the character Demian (a classic "seeker") and his quest for self-awareness. Published during the troubled Weimar years, the novel was very popular and had a pervasive influence on the Germans. It also made Hesse famous.
    ellauri069.html on line 290: Hän haluis tutkia miten Laiskiainen tekee tän. Sen sijaan hänelle annetaan mustekala nimeltä Grigori labraeläimexi. Valkoisessa Vizauxessa toimenpide nimeltä Toimenpide Musta Siipi on menossa. Idea on hyödyntää Sakun siirtomaamenneisyyttä kexityllä propagandalla Afrikkalaisista Sachsassa—lentue Aahrikkalaisia roketti-insinöörejä. Tämä on mixi he tutkivat Laiskiaisen rodullisia ahistuxia, ideoixi miten muotoilla propagandansa.
    ellauri069.html on line 308: Hän lentää Zürichistä Geneveen ja takaisin. (Jännää!) Monimutkaisessa triviaalikaupassa, hän saa kansion Laszlo Jamfista, Imupeukku G:n kexijästä.
    ellauri069.html on line 318: Pian jälkeen, Koulu-Laiskuri peukalokyyteilee Berliiniin piirassalakuljettajan kuumailmapallossa. Suurehko Mervi jahtaa häntä lentokoneessa, mutta kiitos hyvin-tähdätylle piiraalle Laiskiainen karkaa. Sota-revityssä Berliinissä jutut ovat synkkiä; Alokas alentuu syömään jämiä ja juomaan lammesta. ("This is the Army Mr. Jones...")
    ellauri069.html on line 323: Laiskis putoaa jonkun kynsiin joka douppaa sen. Vapautettuna, se kohtaa mykän filmitähden Margherita Erdmann. Se ja sen mies Toni Erdmann kerran esiintyivät miehistölle roketin lähetyspaikoilla. Veltto Virtanen matkustaa veneellä Anubixen kannella Margheritan kaa Oder Joella Sachsassa. Sillä aikaa kun on kannella hänellä on liikeasia Margheritan alaikäisen tyttären Biancan kaa. Erään myrskyn aikana Laiskis putoo laidan yli.
    ellauri069.html on line 399: —the peregrinations of a Soviet agent named Tchitcherine, a man initiated into mysticism while administering a territory in Central Asia and now on vengeful search for his Herero half-brother, who also has his share of juicy fucks;
    ellauri069.html on line 414: Tärkeämpi jarru lukijalle kuin tämmöinen rähmäinen psykopolitiikka on Nipsun izekeskeinen kerronta, missä on vaan yxi ääni: terveellä mies-ja-ääniperiaatteella ainut puhuja on Tomppa ize, joskus ekassa joskus toisessa joskus tuskin missään persoonassa. Se ois voinut laittaa viime viikon ostoslistan textin sekaan eikä kukaan olis ollut hurskaampi hullua. (Mihis Tomppa-raukalta jäi puolipisteet, kysyy arvostelija. No mihis niitä tarvitaan?)
    ellauri069.html on line 446: Ultimately, pro-feminist men need to work towards positive subjectivities which neither co-opt feminism nor revel masochistically in self-abasement.
    ellauri069.html on line 457: A: I never thought I would live to see a time when Gravity’s Rainbow would be denigrated and dismissed for lacking sense. This book appeared when I was a freshman at university. It was immediately chosen as part of the reading list for a course in 20th century fiction in English and regarded as important, and it was expected that simple-minded undergraduates should be able to make a serious attempt to engage with the book using heart, faith, skill, and such intelligence as they possessed. As a result, I own a first edition. ;)
    ellauri069.html on line 477: Before I write this answer, I should put it out there that it took me two reads and a guide to understand what’s going on in Gravity’s Rainbow. After all that, I feel I have a proper grasp of Pynchon’s Magnum Opus. Apparently, Pynchon once said he doesn’t know how he wrote the book.
    ellauri069.html on line 479: Imagine a story that combines Ulysses, Catch-22, The Canterbury tales, Under the Volcano, On the Road and many others. First, there is a huge cast of characters and most times, it is unclear who’s speaking and to whom. A second challenge is getting into the context of the book. The novel demands a vast knowledge of history, geography, music, literature, science, mathematics and occult. Apart from this the book also explicitly deals with profanity, racism, violence, pedophilia, coprophilia and seemingly infinite number of sex scenes. That being said, Pynchon doesn’t throw them arbitrarily and each one of them have a purpose. The main plot itself is set at the end of World War 2 and Europe is in chaos. As new countries and alliances are being formed, so too are new perspectives within the characters. Mental state being broken down, people making poor choices and actions being justified and helps us see how people tend to live destructively. As if there complexities weren’t enough, Pynchon includes a “postmodern” aspect of the book that leaves the first-time reader confused. Pynchon’s voice is seen through this aspect and a sense of paranoia creeps throughout the book and everything is questioned.
    ellauri069.html on line 483: An article recently came out in the LA Times about Pynchon’s Great American Novel. The article begins by stating that Mason and Dixon is actually the most obvious candidate for the Great American Novel, and it instead suggests that Gravity’s Rainbow is perhaps the Great European Novel. The article then questions whether or not the Great American Novel even exists, and if it does if it is of a singular form or if it takes on many forms at once. After considering this question, the article finally claims that the Great American Novel is actually made up of all of Pynchon’s works fused together “into one epic Pynchoverse.” The Great American Novel certainly does not need to take place in America, but still many will argue that Gravity’s Rainbow by itself can never be considered as the Great American Novel because of its non-American setting and its wide array of characters. This is definitely debatable, but I do enjoy the idea of a “Pynchoverse” or a Pynchon Compilation being considered as the true Great American Novel. That being said, I do think most readers and Pynchonerds would undoubtedly say that Gravity's Rainbow is the Greatest Pynchon Novel.
    ellauri069.html on line 491: My engineer nerd friends insisted that I should read Gravity's Rainbow, since it was rich with near-poetic observations about engineering and math. It was also rich with military history, jargon, and Pynchonian bong-hit digressions.
    ellauri069.html on line 495: Recently, I got a subscription to Audible and picked up the George Guidall unabridged audiobook of this dense tome. Unabridged, the book took up 37 hours and 21 minutes. Over about 2 months of commutes and air travel, I finally “read” the book. And that will only be the FIRST reading. I probably absorbed maybe 25% of the meaning (generously) but at least got to hear the sections waxing poetic on calculus, aeronautical engineering, and the nature of creating things. There was also an unexpected amount of graphic sex and other wacky perversions, but I guess that was just a bonus.
    ellauri069.html on line 580: Stella Dallas is a 1937 American drama film based on the 1923 Olive Higgins Prouty novel of the same name. Stella Martin, the daughter of a mill worker, Charlie, in a post-World War I Massachusetts factory town, is determined to better herself. She sets her sights on mill executive Stephen Dallas and catches him at an emotionally vulnerable time. Stephen's father killed himself after losing his fortune. Penniless, Stephen disappeared from high society, intending to marry his fiancée, Helen Morrison, once he was financially able to support her. However, just as he reaches his goal, he reads in the newspaper the announcement of her wedding. So he marries Stella.
    ellauri069.html on line 632: Tää on kyllä tyypillistä Wagner-tuubaa josta innostuu se sama hörhöporukka kuin ennenkin, siis kaikenlaiset mystikot ja sadomasokistit pygofiilit. Nipsu on beatnikki, vähän iäkäs jo hipixi, mutta innostuu hippihörhöilystä kovasti. Varsinkin mömmöilystä nähtävästi. Ilmaisesta jäzkistä, godixista ja ilmaisista lyhytmekkoisista pikkutytöistä. Vietti 10v länsirannikolla niissä puuhissa. Wartburgia ei enää tunneta edes samannimisistä autoista.
    ellauri069.html on line 672: The packaging for the new Cracker Jack returns to prominence the familiar logo of the sailor boy and his dog. Officially, those are Sailor Jack and Bingo -- introduced in 1918 and based on the Rueckheims’ nephew and a stray dog adopted by one of the partners.
    ellauri069.html on line 682: Cracker Jack, the 120-year-old snack regarded by some historians as the first junk food, is introducing two new flavors. Not only will there be the sweet, peanut-and-molasses original, but also a Kettle Corn and a Butter Toffee flavor.
    ellauri069.html on line 697: Drake is a sort of modern-day Robin Hood. He donates the proceeds of his latest robbery to fund the stalled construction of the "New Social Institute". He even writes a book, "Crackerjack": The true story of my exploits, which becomes a bestseller.
    ellauri069.html on line 699: Astro city list of superheroes: Crackerjack (featured) - An egocentric and reckless blowhard with amazing agility and a stiff weapon. Active since 1991. he reflects the disconnect that frequently existed between superheroes' sterling public personas and unappealing private behavior. Possessing no super-powers, he is dedicated to his superhero career to the point of obsession, to the extent of refusing to allow increasing human limitations to curtail his activities.
    ellauri069.html on line 714: American poet, novelist, essayist, songwriter, playwright, editor and publisher. Known for his satirical works challenging American political culture. Perhaps his best-kĺnown work is Mumbo Jumbo (1972), a sprawling and unorthodox novel set in 1920s New York that has been ranked among the 500 most important books in the Western canon. Reed´s work has often sought to represent neglected African and African-American perspectives; his energy and advocacy have centered more broadly on neglected peoples and perspectives, irrespective of their cultural origins.
    ellauri069.html on line 725: Denis Nayland Smith (Earth-616) - Marvel Database. marvel.fandom.com › wiki › Denis_Nayl... History. Smith was Britain´s police commissioner in Burma when he first came across Fu Manchu. Along with his friend Dr.
    ellauri069.html on line 783: Other putative allegorical devices of the book include the Wicked Witch of the West as a figure for the actual American West; if this is true, then the Winged Monkeys could represent another western danger: Indigenous peoples of the Americas. The King of the Winged Monkeys tells Dorothy, "Once we were a free people, living happily in the great forest, flying from tree to tree, eating nuts and fruit and doing just as we pleased without calling anybody master. ... This was many years ago, long before Oz came out of the clouds to rule over this land."
    ellauri069.html on line 785: In fact, Baum proposed in two editorials he wrote in December 1890 for his newspaper, the Saturday Pioneer, the total genocidal slaughter of all remaining indigenous peoples. "The Whites," Baum wrote, "by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians. Why not annihilation?"
    ellauri069.html on line 790: Saatana että se sammakko teki terää kullille. Ei olisi yhtään pahitteexi vaikka sen nyt lykkäisi jonkun huoran sisuxiin. Hei, mistäs täältä saisi pillua? Marvy haluaa vain tumman ihon, suljetun suun, ihanan neekerialistumisen. Tyttö on valmis kaikkeen mitä hän käskee, hän voi vaikka panaa tytön pään veden alle ja pitää sen siellä kunnes hän hukkuu, hän voi vääntää tytön kättä taaxepäin ja murskata sormet niinkuin teki sille yhdelle huoralle frankfurtissa tässä pari viikkoa takaperin. Hakata pistoolinpiipulla, purra verille. Näyt kuhisevat hänen aivoissaan, väkivaltaiset ja vähemmän eroottiset kuin arvaattekaan - pikemmnkin niihin liittyy vain työntämistä, osumista, tunkeutumista ja muita sotilaallisia arvoja. Mikä ei suinkaan tarkoita, etteikö Marvy nauttisi olostaan ihan yhtä viattomasti kuin tekin. Eikä sitä, etteikö Manuela jollakin kiihkottoman urheilullisella tavalla mielellään liikkkuisi yläs alas majurin izepintaisella punaisella kangella...
    ellauri070.html on line 76: Musta alkaa tuntua et Pynchon haluu tunnustaa tykkäävänsä schischeleistä, eikä yxinomaan irtopilluista. Loppuvizeissä on paljon hilpeitä.
    ellauri070.html on line 78: Roger Mexiko haluis nuolla vielä Jessicaa mut tää tietää millä puolella leipää voita on. Roger tykkää kuiteskin eniten sinisestä smurffiveljestä. Roger on Schlumpfin sielun veli, niillä on enemmänkin yhteistä kuin schischelifetischi. Ne on kuin Roger Casement ja Tyrone Power. Ne on samixia. Ne on ize asiassa sama henkilö, nimittäin tää Nipistin.
    ellauri070.html on line 80: Actor Tyrone Power was born in Cincinnati, Ohio. Power led a busy bisexual life in Hollywood and was involved with several men during his career.
    ellauri070.html on line 122: S. 808 Schlumpf näkee paxun sateenkaaren joka sekin muistuttaa sitä schischelistä. Siitin on kylä Nipsun idé fixe. Ei niinkään siittäminen kuin sillä vehtaus.
    ellauri070.html on line 126: Miten tässä näin pääsi käymään? No Amerikan alaluokka puri ennen hammasta, uskoi naivistisesti Amerikan uneen: kun koko ajan eletään yli luonnonvarojen ja ryöstellään kaikki muilta uhkaamalla pommilla, niin kyllä meillekin lopulta paistaa aurinko tänne risukasaan. Ainakin jos on onnea. Nyt on varat vähissä, jazo tyhjennetty, köyhät anglosaxit kiukustuvat, niinkuin ne on aina tehneet köyhemmissä maissa. Unelma on muuttumassa painajaisexi. Holy Trump, make America great again, failing that, save our souls.
    ellauri070.html on line 152: Koraanimaisesti enkelivälityksenä ihmiskunnalle annettu teksti muodostaa länsimaisen runouden historiassa käänteentekevän kielellisen ja kulttuurisen keittiösaarekkeen, joka on sukupolvien ajan muistuttanut lähes uskontoa.
    ellauri070.html on line 315: Skippy is an American comic strip written and drawn by Percy Crosby that was published from 1923 to 1945. A highly popular, acclaimed and influential feature about rambunctious fifth-grader Skippy Skinner, his friends and his enemies, it was adapted into movies, a novel and a radio show. It was commemorated on a 1997 U.S. Postal Service stamp and was the basis for a wide range of merchandising—although perhaps the most well-known product bearing the Skippy name, Skippy peanut butter, used the name without Crosby´s authorization, leading to a protracted trademark conflict.
    ellauri070.html on line 340: In Jewish Kabbalistic cosmology of Isaac Luria, the qlippot are metaphorical "shells" surrounding holiness. They are spiritual obstacles receiving their existence from God only in an external, rather than internal manner. Divinity in Judaism connotes revelation of God's true unity, while the shells conceal holiness, as a peel conceals the fruit within. They are therefore synonymous with idolatry, the root of impurity through ascribing false dualism in the Divine, and with the Sitra Achra (סטרא אחרא "Other Side"), the perceived realm opposite to holiness. They emerge in the descending seder hishtalshelus (Chain of Being) through Tzimtzum (contraction of the Divine Ohr), as part of the purpose of Creation. In this they also have beneficial properties, as peel protects the fruit, restraining the Divine flow from being dissipated. Kabbalah distinguishes between two realms in qlippot, the completely impure and the intermediate.
    ellauri070.html on line 342: Their four "concentric" terms are derived from Ezekiel's vision (1:4), "And I looked and behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about it..." The "Three Impure Qlippot" (completely Tamei "impure") are read in the first three terms, the intermediate "Shining Qlippah" (Nogah "brightness") is read in the fourth term, mediating as the first covering directly surrounding holiness, and capable of sublimation. In medieval Kabbalah, the Shekhinah is separated in Creation from the Sefirot by man´s sin, while in Lurianic Kabbalah Divinity is exiled in the qlippot from prior initial Catastrophe in Creation. This causes "Sparks of Holiness" to be exiled in the qlippot, Jewish Observance with physical objects redeeming mundane Nogah, while the Three Impure Qlippot are elevated indirectly through Negative prohibitions. Repentance out of love retrospectively turns sin into virtue, darkness into light. When all the sparks are freed from the qlippot, depriving them of their vitality, the Messianic era begins. In Hasidic philosophy, the kabbalistic scheme of qlippot is internalised in psychological experience as self-focus, opposite to holy devekut self-nullification, underlying its Panentheistic Monistic view of qlippot as the illusionary self-awareness of Creation.
    ellauri070.html on line 384: "A penny saved is a penny earned" is a quote often attributed to Benjamin Franklin, however, he didn’t coin it. In his 1737 Poor Richard’s Almanac, Franklin delivered the line: “A penny saved is two pence clear.” And later, in the 1758 almanac, he wrote a version closer to the saying we know: "A penny saved is a penny got." He never used the word "earned."
    ellauri070.html on line 433: Star Trek is an American media franchise originating from the 1960s science fiction television series Star Trek, created by Gene Roddenberry. That series, now often known as "The Original Series", debuted on September 8, 1966, and aired for three seasons on NBC. It followed the voyages of the starship USS Enterprise, a space exploration vessel built by the United Federation of Planets in the 23rd century, on a mission "to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before". In creating Star Trek, Roddenberry was inspired by C. S. Forester's Horatio Hornblower series of novels, Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels, and television westerns such as Wagon Train. Hornblowerit oli Anna-Kaisa Oraviston mielilukemistoa. Pia Pipsukka piti Heinz Konsalikista.
    ellauri070.html on line 447: Mutjos Hogan on Tyrone-Nipsun veli John, niin kuka sit on toi Jack, josta sen äiskä kirjoittaa huolissaan humalassa John FGK:lle? "Jack on hyvä poika. Minä oikeasti rakastan Jackia siinä missä Hogania ja Tyroneakin, ihan niinkuin omaa poikaani. Rakastan häntä jopa niin kuin en rakasta omia poikiani, hah-hah! (hän kähisee), mutta minähän olenkin ilkeä vanha akka, sen sinä tiedät. Minunlaisillani ei ole toivoa..." Onx Jack joku ottopoika, vaikka se neekeri? WW2 kaatuneiden listasta ei löydy ketään Pynchon nimistä, mut mitäs se nyt todistaa. Ota tästä nyt selvä. Mut muuten väite että Slothrop olis tähän mennessä jotenkin hajonnut on pelkkää hämäystä. tää luku on selvin kaikista ja kertoo Pynchonista eniten.
    ellauri070.html on line 454: Then, "On the Phrase 'Ass Backwards'" (683-87): Säure Bummer, talking to Slothrop, attacks the illogic of this phrase. "takaperin" on väpelö käännös, vizi menee pilalle. Olis kannattanut jättää kääntämättä.
    ellauri071.html on line 44: Tucker Carlson Justifies Kenosha Shootings: Vigilante Kid Did What ‘No One Else Would’ AND THERE IT IS “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” Carlson asked his viewers on Wednesday night. “Our leaders want us to believe this is a racial conflict, they’re always telling us it is. They’re lying. It is not a racial conflict,” Carlson grumbled, adding: “This is not a race war. This is a class war.” Updated Aug. 27, 2020 5:20AM ET / Published Aug. 26, 2020 9:11PM ET
    ellauri071.html on line 48: The Kenosha Kid by Forbes Parkhill (Aug 1931) "A Robinhood of straights and flushes plays his most thrilling game for a desperation jackpot."
    ellauri071.html on line 80: "Little sigma, times P of s equals one over the square root of two pi, times e to the minus s squared over two little-sigma squared" would be the probability density function for a Normally Distributed random variable with mean zero and standard deviation little sigma (though here the traditional form has been multiplied through by little sigma, probably to make it easier for Roger to say). But this is "P of s-over-little-sigma" - a reference to things not being quite Normal?
    ellauri071.html on line 89:

    Is this Noel Coward or some shit?


    ellauri071.html on line 93: Roger’s antipathy to Coward´s comedies of manners echoes the comments about Blithe Spirit in the Advent passage at 134 and passim. Pynchon’s own antipathy to the composer, writer and actor goes all the way back to "Lowlands," one of his first published stories.
    ellauri071.html on line 95: Sir Noël Peirce Coward (16 December 1899 – 26 March 1973) was an English playwright, composer, director, actor and singer, known for his wit, flamboyance, and what Time magazine called "a sense of personal style, a combination of cheek and chic, pose and poise".
    ellauri071.html on line 99: Encouraged by his ambitious mother, who sent him to a dance academy in London, Coward's first professional engagement was in January 1911 as Prince Mussel in the children's play The Goldfish.
    ellauri071.html on line 101: He did not publicly acknowledge his homosexuality, but it was discussed candidly after his death by biographers including Graham Payn, his long-time partner, and in Coward's diaries and letters, published posthumously.
    ellauri071.html on line 105: In 1924, Coward achieved his first great critical and financial success as a playwright with The Vortex. The story is about a nymphomaniac socialite and her cocaine-addicted son (played by Coward). Some saw the drugs as a mask for homosexuality; Kenneth Tynan later described it as "a jeremiad against narcotics with dialogue that sounds today not so much stilted as high-heeled".
    ellauri071.html on line 107: During the run of The Vortex, Coward met Jack Wilson, an American stockbroker (later a director and producer), who became his business manager and lover. Wilson used his position to steal from Coward, but the playwright was in love and accepted both the larceny and Wilson's heavy drinking.
    ellauri071.html on line 109: His biggest failure in this period was the play Sirocco (1927), which concerns free love among the wealthy. It starred Ivor Novello, of whom Coward said, "the two most beautiful things in the world are Ivor's profile and my mind". Theatregoers hated the play, showing violent disapproval at the curtain calls and spitting at Coward as he left the theatre. Taisi olla downright homostelua.
    ellauri071.html on line 113: Coward's last pre-war plays were This Happy Breed, a drama about a working-class family, and Present Laughter, a comic self-caricature with an egomaniac actor as the central character.
    ellauri071.html on line 121: Another of Coward's wartime projects, as writer, star, composer and co-director (alongside David Lean), was the naval film drama In Which We Serve. The film was popular on both sides of the Atlantic, and he was awarded an honorary certificate of merit at the 1943 Academy Awards ceremony. Coward played a naval captain, basing the character on his friend Lord Louis Mountbatten.
    ellauri071.html on line 123: Coward's most enduring work from the war years was the hugely successful black comedy Blithe Spirit (1941), about a novelist who researches the occult and hires a medium. A séance brings back the ghost of his first wife, causing havoc for the novelist and his second wife.
    ellauri071.html on line 125: In his Middle East Diary Coward made several statements that offended many Americans. In particular, he commented that he was "less impressed by some of the mournful little Brooklyn boys lying there in tears amid the alien corn with nothing worse than a bullet wound in the leg or a fractured arm". After protests from both The New York Times and The Washington Post, the Foreign Office urged Coward not to visit the United States in January 1945. He did not return to America again during the war.
    ellauri071.html on line 152: Der "Cornet" entstand in einer ersten Fassung 1899, wurde aber erst 1904 veröffentlicht. Laut einem Brief Rilkes war er das Produkt einer einzigen Nacht, "einer Herbstnacht, hingeschrieben bei zwei im Nachtwind wehenden Kerzen". Auf das Thema stieß Rilke bei einem Onkel, der Ahnenforschung betrieb. Als Beleg für die adlige Herkunft seiner Familie hatte dieser die Kopie eines alten Aktenauszugs gefunden, der sich auf einen gewissen "Christoph Rülcke zu Linda" bezieht. Dieser sei 1660 als junger Cornett (Fahnenträger) im österreichischen Heer verstorben. Rilke greift die Handlung auf, verlegt den Tod seines Helden um drei Jahre in den österreichischen Türkenkrieg und macht daraus eine heroische Prosadichtung. Indem er den "Heldentod" poetisch verklärt und mit erotischen Motiven verbindet, trifft der Dichter mit der "Weise von Liebe und Tod des Cornet Christoph Rilke" den Geschmack seiner Zeit. Das Werk wird Rilkes erfolgreichstes und bekanntestes Buch, ist aber wegen der Verherrlichung des Soldatentodes umstritten.
    ellauri071.html on line 220: Junior G-Men was an American counterpart to Hitler Jugend, a boys club and popular culture phenomenon during the late 1930s and early 1940s that began with a radio program and culminated with films featuring the Dead End Kids. After leaving the Federal Bureau of Investigation and a brief stint in Hollywood, Melvin Purvis hosted a children's radio program called "Junior G-Men" in 1936. Purvis had become a national hero for his record as an FBI agent during the so-called "war on crime" in the early 1930s, most notably for leading the manhunt that ended with the death of John Dillinger. As a result of this fame, Purvis was seen as a real-life counterpart to the fictional detectives, such as Dick Tracy, that proliferated in the popular culture targeting boys during this period. As part of the radio program, listeners could join a "Junior G-Men" club and receive badges, manuals, and secret agent props. Shortly thereafter, Purvis became the face of breakfast cereal Post Toasties promotional detective club. The cereal company's fictional "Inspector Post" and his "Junior Detective Corps" metamorphosed into an image of Purvis inviting boys and girls to become "secret operators" in his "Law and Order Patrols."
    ellauri071.html on line 222: As a result of this mass exposure, Junior G-Men clubs sprouted up throughout the United States and Canada as a "law and order" themed alternative to the Boy Scouts. Junior G-Men clubs found support from police departments and non-profit organizations that saw them as a means of combating juvenile delinquency. The clubs structured children´s time with activities designed to instill law-abiding attitudes, as reflected in their slogan "It's easier to build boys than to mend men." Tätä perinnettä jatkaa nytten Donald Trump and his Proud Boys. Stand back, stand by. We love you, you are special. Least said soonest mended.
    ellauri071.html on line 432: Metatron is the angel that governs the Tree of Life and the teachings of the Kabbalah. Melchidael is one of the top three of the seven archangels; Yahoel was the angel that taught Abraham the Torah and was his earthly and heavenly guide. Anafiel, "Branch of God," keeper of the keys of heaven, and the angel who looks after birds, and who carried Enoch to heaven.
    ellauri071.html on line 460: Tomppeli on varmasti saanut äidiltä vizaa paljaalle pyllylle vähän liian isona. Noi hissi-raketti -symboliikat on aika selviä, miljoonat valkopukuiset siittiöt tungexii kokoontumisaulassa päästäxeen uimaradalle kuin Woodyn elokuvissa. Alaikäisten poikien pyllistelyä nahkahousuissa, "Lederhoseners" (mautonta kulttuurista appropriointia), Nipsun kullin päähän kiinnitetty kulkunen alkaa kilistä. Näkyjä äidin koivunvizasta läjähtämässä päin alastonta pyllyä, pohkeita, jalkateriä ja reisiä kazottuna hameen alta ylöspäin. Voi tuota Nipsua! Lapsuudenmuistoja! Herttasta! On se liikuttava! Se on lapsi joka inhoaa äidin pelmeniä. Nipsun kotiolot on varmaan olleet aika vääristyneet. Taisin olla oikeassa että tässä vikassa luvussa alkaa selvitä mikä oikein on mitäkin, ja mikä Nipsua mahtaa oikeasti vaivata.
    ellauri071.html on line 471: Around 1850, a British merchant service captain, Charles Noble, upon discovering that the stack of his ship´s galley was made of copper, ordered that it be kept bright. From then onwards the ship´s crew then started referring to the galley smokestack as the "Charlie Noble".
    ellauri071.html on line 520: Tässä vaiheessa on käynyt selväxi et koko Vyöhyke on nyt jenkeissä. Nipsun oidipaalinen ongelma ei olekaan tuomizeva isähahmo, vaan pikemminkin päinvastoin että rakas äiti on miehistynyt vanha rahamassi, ja iskä vaan vinkuu jossain taustalla. Bow tie daddy don't you blow you top / cause you think you're getting too old, lauloi Borat-wiixinen Frank Zappa mun summanmutikassa ostamalla levyllä. Raketti ja Torni (h.k.) edustavat myös kikkeliä, niinkuin kaikki vähänkin sikaaria muistuttavat esineet tässä kirjassa.
    ellauri071.html on line 556: Yesod on tämmönen välittäjä, joka ruiskauttaa jumalan voiman johkin perseeseen. Niinpä Yesod liittyy sukupuolielimeen (tietysti miehiseen). Malkuth alhaalla on se naispuolinen perse. Kristityt liittää Yesodin pyhän kolminaisuuden kolmanteen jäseneen, siihen kondominnäköiseen. Sehän se Mariankin pani paxuxi. (I´m not the father, sanovat isä & poika viattoman näköisinä kuorossa.)
    ellauri071.html on line 560: Nää höpötyxet on nähtävästi peräisin tolta Wilhon näköseltä AE Waitelta. Waiten Kabbala-niteessä jokasella hyvixellä on vastaava pahis:
    ellauri071.html on line 569: In Arthur Edward Waite´s version of The Holy Kabbalah (255), Samael is described as the "severity of God", and is listed as fifth of the archangel of the world of Briah. Samael is said to have taken Lilith as his bride after she left Adam. According to Zoharistic cabala Samael was also mated with Eisheth Zenunim, Na´amah, and Agrat Bat Mahlat — all angels of sacred prostitution. Tää ei nyt ehkä mennyt ihan oikein Arttu perkele.
    ellauri071.html on line 608: Mixhän tää kullin purkautuminen siihen tai toiseen onkaloon on Nipsulle niin täynnä pyhiä merkityxiä? No kääntäen, ehkä se todistaa mihin asti pyhistelyllä pystyy pääsemään. Syvälle Anuxeen. (H.K.) En kyllä tajua miten kukaan voi kiihottua noin kovasti jostain roketista. Mut se on amerikkalaisilla ihan iholla. Mitä helvatin rakkautta se nyt on että lähettää katamiittinsa raketilla pelkälle menomatkalle kuin Laika-koiran? Nipsun pää vaatisi vakavaa remonttia. Mutta se lienee myöhäistä, äijä on jo 83. Joku roketti sais pudota se harvahapsiseen päähän.
    ellauri072.html on line 43: Taavin niminovelli puhuu nimenomaan miehistä. Muissa novelleissa on naisiakin. Sen ihmiset on kyllä eri muotopuolia. Kirja on täynnä erilaisia narsisteja ja psykopaatteja. Se on kuin jonkinlainen ihmissudenpentujen käsikirja. Hupaisasti kyllä, nytkun mulla on yli 70 albumia ja lähes puolitoistasataa paasausta, monet jutut alkaa toistua. Onko ihmiselon koko ihanuus ja kurjuus jo vähintään kertaalleen mulla mukana? Esim. keski-iässä izemurhan tehneet epäonnistuneet narsistit (ks. Suikkasia ohessa), tai algolagniasta eli SM:stä innostuneet kuikelot (esim Swinburne, Pynchon ja nyt sitten Wallase).
    ellauri072.html on line 135: Heinrich von Kleist stand als Außenseiter im literarischen Leben seiner Zeit, jenseits der etablierten Lager und der Literaturepochen der Weimarer Klassik und der Romantik. Bekannt ist er vor allem für das historische Ritterschauspiel Das Käthchen von Heilbronn, seine Lustspiele Der zerbrochne Krug und Amphitryon, das Trauerspiel Penthesilea sowie für seine Novellen Michael Kohlhaas und Die Marquise von O....
    ellauri072.html on line 145: No More Games. No More Bombs. No More Walking. No More Fun. No More Swimming. 67. That is 17 years past 50. 17 more than I needed or wanted. Boring. I am always bitchy. No Fun – for anybody. 67. You are getting Greedy. Act your old age. Relax – This won’t hurt.
    ellauri072.html on line 160: It was an episode in Frost’s life that occurred in 1894, when he was 20. He desperately wanted to fuck his high school girlfriend, Elinor White, pressuring her to quit St. Lawrence University as he had Dartmouth. She refused.
    ellauri072.html on line 162: Frost calculated that the best way to win her over was to present her with a volume of his first poems. He put them together in a pamphlet, had them printed on fine paper and bound in leather with gold print. When he got to the front door of her boarding house in Canton, New York, Hart said, “She basically shut the door in his face.”
    ellauri072.html on line 168: Frost boarded a steamship from New York to Norfolk, and walked into the Great Dismal Swamp where, Hart maintained, he planned to commit suicide in the woods by a canal. Some biographers have scoffed at the idea that Frost wanted to “throw… [his] life away” in the swamp.
    ellauri072.html on line 170: “But that’s what he said when he was candid in interviews,” Hart said, “that he wanted to put an end to his life in the Great Dismal Swamp. He went in with his street clothes, a little satchel, no food or gear. He was rescued by a couple of guys in a boat who were going down the canal [to pick up some duck hunters].”
    ellauri072.html on line 174: “One of the last poems he wrote was called ‘Kitty Hawk,’ and the first part was all about being rejected by Elinor and going to the Great Dismal Swamp … I think he was like a devastated Romeo who was going to end his life.”
    ellauri072.html on line 204: The problems of Dante's treatment of the punishment of homosexuals in Hell and of his more surprising salvation of still other (unnamed) homosexuals in Purgatory have had two recent responses that restore a central fact: cantos 15 and 16 of Inferno and canto 26 of Purgatorio are in fact concerned with this issue. Boswell's pages insisting on the identity of the sexual sin punished in Inf. 15-16 and the lust repented on the seventh terrace {"Dante and the Sodomites," 65-67} are convincing. "Soddoma" is used clearly to identify homosexual activity in Purg. 26 (vv. 40 and 79) and thus makes clear its meaning in Inf. 11.50 and therefore the nature of the sin encountered in Inf. 15 and 16.
    ellauri072.html on line 208: This surprising, even shockingly "liberal" view of homosexual love as being the counterpart of the heterosexual kind should cause more notice than it generally does; perhaps even greater surprise should attend the extraordinarily generous gestures made toward the three Florentine homosexual politicians, Iacopo Rusticucci, Guido Guerra, and Tegghiaio Aldobrandi, whom we encounter in Inf. 16. They are presented as being among the most admirable figures in Hell. Let us examine the scene briefly. Virgil, who so often warns Dante when the latter begins to admire or become sympathetic (or overly concerned with) the damned, here is urgent in his approbation of these three sinners: "a costor si vuole esser cortese." This is the only time in Hell in which cortesia is mentioned as a fitting response to the damned except for Beatrice's and Dante's use of "cortese" for Virgil (Inf. 2.58, 2.134). The following tercet only emphasizes the guide's appreciation of their worthiness.
    ellauri072.html on line 211: This is the only place in Hell that a group of sinners speaks courteously to Dante in a single voice ("rispuoser tutti" is the indication; again, the only similar moment occurs in Limbo -- 4.98 -- when the four poets give Dante their [unspoken?] greeting as one).
    ellauri072.html on line 213: Leaving Dante and Virgil, the sinners vanish so quickly that "Un amen" could not be uttered in so little time. That Dante should turn to the language of prayer for his comparison, notwithstanding the proverbial and popular origins of the phrase, probably also reflects on the esteem that he felt and continues to feel for the three Florentines. It is a rare thing in the Inferno to find a moment in which the pilgrim, the poet, and the guide are all in absolute agreement, and certainly with respect to the human worth of sinners.
    ellauri072.html on line 216: As we see in Inferno 15-16, in Hell Dante damns sodomites as sinners of violence against nature. Nonetheless, even in his Hell, where Dante does not go so far as to include homosexuals as unrepentant lustful in the second circle, he still desexualizes his treatment of sodomy. What do we learn from all this? Yet the fact that here, as in Purg. 26, he chooses to put homosexuals in a good light when there was no apparent compelling reason for him to do so surely should cause us to ask further questions about Dante's views concerning homosexuality. Varmaan se oli homo izekin, Beatrice or no Beatrice. Sixkai sille riitti vaan ulista siitä Beatricesta. Satis enim dictum erat de tam obscena et tam spurca materia.
    ellauri072.html on line 314: Neljännen seinän rikkominen tarkoittaa näiden illuusioiden korvaamista toisilla. Elokuvassa päähenkilö saattaa yhtäkkiä puhutella suoraan kameraa (eli siis "muka" yleisöä, siis sinua NIIN! TARKOITAN JUURI SINUA! ÄLÄ YRITÄ PIILESKELLÄ! SINUT ON NÄHTY! joka löhööt sohvalla ja luet tätä paasausta just kännystä) tai kirjassa kirjailija ize tai jopa joku kirjan henkilö saattaa alkaa kommentoida juonenkulun epäloogisuutta. Tää on kyllä täynnä fiktiota koko paska, koska se "kirjailija"kin voi olla vaan joku "otaxuttu tekijä" tms viiden eri käärepaperin sisässä, tämmöisille kusetuxille on kirjallisuustieteessä silmittömästi eri nimiä. (Videopeleistä en viizi sanoa yhtään mitään, ne on niin lopen syvältä. "Olen pahoillani, mutta olen tallentanut videota siitä kun sä vedät käteen kazellessasi pornokuvia. Maxa X bitcoinia tälle tilille tai lähetän sen nauhoituxen sun soittolistalle. Terveisin Ahmed Ahne Bangla Deshistä." )
    ellauri072.html on line 477: What will happen when the age-old economy of scarcity gives way to the Age of Leisure? Professor Gabor, who won the 1971 Nobel Prize for physics offers a futuristic projection based on a static population and GNP, "classless, democratic, and uniformly rich." Fearful that total secruity "will create unbearable boredom and bring out the worst in Irrational Man," Gabor is anxious to retain "effort," "hardship," and the Protestant Ethic -- lest society dissolve in an orgy of anti-social, hedonistic nihilism (viz. the current drug explosion and the spoiled-brat students). To avoid such evils Gabor proposes that work and its attendant moral uplift be divorced from production and the service sector of the economy be vastly enlarged. But this is only the beginning -- enthusiastic about Social Engineering Gabor suggests using it to weed out potential misfits, trouble-makers and "power addicts"; supplementing I.Q. tests with E.Q. (Ethical Quotient) measurements; and modeling elementary and secondary education on the 19th century British public school which knew so well how to inculcate good citizenship, intellectual excellence and pride in achievement. The Third World, still wrestling with pre-industrial material want, is ignored -- since we can't afford any more industrial pollution presumably they will just have to adjust to their misery. Gabor's assessment of "the Nature of Man" shows a woefully naive Anglo-American ethnocentricity and complete ignorance of anthropology and his vision of post-industrial utopia operating on the moral axioms of the 19th century is as elitist as it is improbable.
    ellauri072.html on line 491: What with the recursive and self-reflexive and aw-shucks mixed with Kier­kegaard and Stanley Cavell and higher mathematics, Wallace is infectious — weirdly, this is the case even if you have never read him! the voice has permeated the culture! Wow!
    ellauri072.html on line 495: Maybe you were a bit quick to straighten that miter you now realize you were wearing and, of course, speck-of-sawdust-in-your-brother’s-eye, etc., and also, as Alcoholics Anonymous would put it, Whoever is upsetting me most is my best teacher, and as Wallace put it, in his novel “Infinite Jest,” “It starts to turn out that the vapider the A.A. cliché, the sharper the canines of the real truth it covers.”
    ellauri072.html on line 499: David Foster Wallace wrote three novels, three story collections, two collections of essays, and other things too, but his reputation still rests mainly on “Infinite Jest” — the 1,100-page novel published in 1996 and set alternately in a tennis academy and a rehab center — and on his sui generis now-nearly-a-genre long-form journalism about topics ranging from lobsters to dictionaries to John McCain to the Adult Video News awards for pornographic films. Wallace’s best work, perhaps by far, is “The Pale King,” an unfinished novel about I.R.S. employees that was assembled posthumously by Wallace’s editor, Michael Pietsch.
    ellauri072.html on line 506: Her work appears often in The New Yorker. So she is a girl. Or woman, politically correctly, in her mid forties. This she wrote 2012 when she was still up and coming.
    ellauri072.html on line 508: Infinite Jest is not the only thing that made Wallu famous, though. There was also his bandanna, which was as misinterpreted as so much else about him. As the Max biography explains, Wallace started wearing the bandanna as the least embarrassing solution he could think of to obscure the intense sweating attacks that overcame him without warning. (In high school, he had taken to carrying around a tennis racket and a towel as a tacit cover story for the sweating.) The acutely self-conscious, anxious, addicted and at times showy characters in Wallace’s fiction were not, Max helps us recognize, wildly difficult for Wallace to imagine — the characters were iterations of himself.
    ellauri072.html on line 516: Any diagnoses seem as unilluminating as saying that the “reason” someone is short is because he is 5-foot‑1. About Wallace’s problems it seems worth noting simply that his A.A. attendance coincided with a long period of relative wellness, and that getting off the antidepressant Nardil, which he had taken most of his adult life, coincided with a serious crash in mood that ended in his suicide six months later.
    ellauri072.html on line 520: The externals of Wallace’s life are not too distinctive. He was a smart kid raised in a middle-class family in Urbana, Ill.; his mother was an English teacher and his father a professor of philosophy. Wallace attended Amherst, where he first had trouble fitting in and then found a niche where he fit in very well. He had some intense and dramatic long-term relationships with women and also his share of brief sexual encounters, and he eventually had what is said to have been a loving and grounded marriage. It is his internal agitations, not his circumstances, that were extreme.
    ellauri072.html on line 524: We don’t always find ourselves asking whether a writer is nice. I’ve never heard anyone wonder this at length about, say, Haruki Murakami or Jennifer Egan.
    ellauri072.html on line 528: But Wallace has been called “wise” and “gentle” enough times to nauseate even the devotees who call him wise and gentle; at the same time, his fiction has been condemned as lacking in heart. Why is his “niceness” so central a concern?
    ellauri072.html on line 532: To some extent, his subject matter invites the ad or pro hominem fallacy. Wallace’s lonelies, wastoids and number crunchers are, often, trying to find ways to live well. One understandably slips from reading something concerned with how to be a good person to expecting the writer to have been more naturally kind himself. That thinking is perfectly wrong, though. Alec Baldwin surely has more to teach us than most about how to hold one’s temper; the co-founder of A.A., Bill W., is a guru of sobriety precisely because sobriety was so difficult for him.
    ellauri072.html on line 540: Another thing, perhaps more powerful, that detains people at the niceness question has to do, I think, with competitiveness. Readers are correct to sense, in Wallace’s elaborate grammars and data fields, not only a generous show but also a tacit petition for our recognition of his intellect. This really annoys some people.
    ellauri072.html on line 548: But yes, Wallace was extremely competitive, even to the point of competing about not being competitive. One of the wincing pleasures of Max’s biography is reading excerpts from Wallace’s correspondence, especially with his close friend and combatant Jonathan Franzen, but also with just about every white male writer he might ever have viewed as a rival or mentor. Aggressive self-abasement, grandstanding, veiled abuse, genuine thoughtfulness, thin-skinned pandering — it’s all there. As the correspondents compete about who is making genuine human connections and who and what is really nice and good, they seem to be in some realm far from most kinds of human connection save for that of heated testosteronic battle.
    ellauri072.html on line 552: In this bizarre arena, niceness becomes just one more mode of competition, thereby undermining itself. Supposedly. But not really.
    ellauri072.html on line 558: It’s not unlike the way Wallace turned a major problem with distraction — you will be amazed by his television watching — into an ability to follow out a thought or topic farther than almost anyone else.
    ellauri072.html on line 562: One of the main criticisms of Wallace’s work is that he simply mirrored decay and malaise instead of moving through and beyond them. This was, not infrequently, one of his own main concerns. But the more nattering and pervasive complaint, which takes on more dimension in Max’s biography, is that he is just too brainy and aggressively difficult — just too, well, mean.
    ellauri072.html on line 566: Let’s disagree. Wallace’s writing is not as difficult to read as it is famed to be, nor as pandering to entertain as he worried it was. Wallace writes in grammatically correct sentences; he tells jokes; and his work, if you are wired a certain way, will affect you emotionally.
    ellauri072.html on line 570: People who find Wallace’s books lacking in heart often object to his thinkiness. But often a thought is an emotion and an emotion is a thought; thinking, like humor, may be an intellectual defense against emotion, but it is a wonderfully advanced defense.
    ellauri072.html on line 584: David Foster Wallace was born in Ithaca, New York, to Sally Jean Wallace (née Foster) and James Donald Wallace, and was raised in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois along with his younger sister, Amy Wallace-Havens.
    ellauri072.html on line 593: The aggressive marketing of this product has been credited in reducing the serious social stigma of incontinence.
    ellauri072.html on line 633: When Gabe came home, Wallace followed him into his room and killed him by striking him in the head with the pipe wrench. Wallace then waited for Susan.
    ellauri072.html on line 636: The Arizona Supreme Court has set aside the death sentences of a man who bludgeoned to death his girlfriend and each of her two children one at a time with a baseball bat and a pipe wrench as they arrived home from school and work. The court ruled that the crimes of James Granvil Wallace were not legally heinous.
    ellauri072.html on line 646: When Gabriel arrived, Wallace hit him 10 times with a 18-inch pipe wrench, crushing his skull and killing him.
    ellauri073.html on line 135: 4. Talouden tilanne on tällä hetkellä kauhistuttava.
    ellauri073.html on line 174: This bestselling book examines childhood trauma and the enduring effects it has on an individual's management of repressed anger and pain.
    ellauri073.html on line 175: Why are many of the most successful people plagued by feelings of emptiness and alienation? This wise and profound book has provided millions of readers with an answer--and has helped them to apply it to their own lives.
    ellauri073.html on line 179: In my work with these people, I found that every one of them has a childhood history that seems significant to me:
    ellauri073.html on line 181: There was a mother who at the core was emotionally insecure, and who depended for her narcissistic equilibrium on the child behaving, or acting, in a particular way. This mother was able to hide her insecurity from the child and from everyone else behind a hard, authoritarian and even totalitarian facade.
    ellauri073.html on line 182: This child had an amazing ability to perceive and respond intuitively, that is, unconsciously, to this need of the mother or of both parents, for him to take on the role that had unconsciously been assigned to him.
    ellauri073.html on line 183: This role secured "love" for the child—that is, his parents' exploitation. He could sense that he was needed, and this need, guaranteed him a measure of existential security.
    ellauri073.html on line 197: John Sidney McCain III (August 29, 1936 - August 25, 2018) was an American statesman and United States Navy officer who served as a United States Senator for Arizona from 1987 until his death in 2018. He previously served two terms in the United States House of Representatives and was the Republican nominee for president of the United States in the 2008 election, which he lost to Barack Obama.
    ellauri073.html on line 202: Cain gets introduced by some kind of very high-ranking Highway Patrol officer whose big hanging gut and face the color of rare steak seemed right out of southern-law-enforcement central casting and who spoke approvingly and at some length about Senator McCain’s military background and his 100 percent conservative voting record on crime, punishment, firearms, and the war on drugs. Wendy—who has electric-blue contact lenses and rigid blond hair and immaculate makeup and accessories and French nails and can perhaps best be described as a very Republican-looking young lady indeed—is back here at the beige table eating a large styrofoam cup of soup and using her cell phone to try to find someplace in downtown Charleston where Mrs. McCain can get her nails done.
    ellauri073.html on line 204: Mrs. McC.’s sedulous attention to her own person’s dress and grooming is already a minor legend among the press corps, and some of the techs speculate that things like getting her nails and hair done, together with being almost Siametically attached to Ms. Lisa Graham Keegan (who is AZ’s education superintendent and supposedly traveling with the senator as his “Advisor on Issues Affecting Education” but is quite plainly really along because she’s Cindy McCain’s friend and confidante and the one person in whose presence Mrs. McC. doesn’t look like a jacklighted deer), are the only things keeping this extremely fragile person together on the Trail. (Onx tää nyt se jota sanottiin julkisesti emättimexi? Ei hizi, kyllä sille tarvittaisiin joku miellyttävämpi sana.)
    ellauri073.html on line 206: A big reason why so many young Independents and Democrats are excited about McCain is that the campaign media focus so much attention on McCain’s piss-and-vinegar candor and so little attention on the sometimes extremely scary right-wing stuff this candor drives him to say. John McCain´s morning speech several times invoked a “moral poverty” in America, a “loss of shame” that he blamed on “the ceaseless assault of violence-driven entertainment that has lost its moral compass to greed” (McCain’s metaphors tend to mix a bit when he gets excited), and made noises that sounded rather a lot like proposing possible federal regulation of all US entertainment. No siinä olis kyllä ollut järkeä.
    ellauri073.html on line 218: Kysymys ei ollut hassu; hiljaisuus oli lähinnä kauhistunut. Olis ollut tosi helppoa ehdokkaan nyt kalveta tai kompastella, tai antaa turvamiesten poistaa sekopää, tai (pahin vaihtoehto) tehdä siitä pilaa jotta kaikki vähän rentoutuisivat ja kerätä irtopisteitä porukoilta äijän kustannuxella, mistä apukynäilijät olis kyllä jäätyneet kyynisyyteen saakka, koska hourupää seisoi vielä siellä mikin ääressä ja kazoi vakavana McCainia, odottaen vastausta. Minkä McCain ihme kyllä huomaa – mies on ihan vakavissaan – ja sanoo, joo kyllä hän lupaa kazoa tuota asiaa, joo kyllä hän laittaa lupauxen kirjallisesti, vaikka hänestä tuntuu että heillä on "vähän eri näkemyxet tästä koneesta”, eli se tekee hullun mielixi eikä mahtaile eikä esitä yhtä hullua, ja tää kaikki niin äkkiä että on vaikee uskoa sen olevan pelkkää feikkiä. (No hitto, kyllä sillä varmaaan on tullut näitä sekopäitä vastaan ennnenkin. Kaikki myyntimiehet tietää miten niiden kanssa toimia.)
    ellauri073.html on line 220: Negativity on vastapuolen haukkumista, esim. Push polling: George W. Bush used push polls in his 1994 bid for Texas Governor against incumbent Ann Richards. Callers asked voters "whether they would be more or less likely to vote for Governor Richards if they knew that lesbians dominated on her staff."
    ellauri073.html on line 227: Toisin sanoen, oikea johtaja on joku joka "auttaa" meitä voittamaan oman henk.koht. laiskuuden ja izekkyyden ja heikkouden rajoituxet ja saa meidät stahanovilaisiin ponnistuxiin, tekemään hyvempiä ja kovempia asioita kuin mitä ize pystymme. (Tommonen niinko persoonallinen treineri, tai Matt Foley, motivational speaker. I am 35 years old, thrice divorced, living in a van down by the river. Yks, kaks, Petteri mukaan. Kazokaa Lallia, kolme, neljä. Vitun Tuomo Jalantie, musta sillä ois saanut vaikka pyyhkiä koiranoxennuxia.) Lincoln oli nähtävästi oikea johtaja (onnexi se ammuttiin), ja Churchill (aimo kusipää vessa kengänkärjessä), ja Gandhi (sankarillinen ruipelo eläinlääkixen edessä jolta viedään aina rillit nenältä), ja King Kong. Teddy Kennedy ja Franklinin Benjamin, ja todennäkösest de Gaulle (se oli pitkä ainakin, ja isonenäinen, hassu verikauha päässä), takuulla ryhmä Haun palomieskoira Marshall, ja ehkä Eisengardin Saruman. No olihan tietty Hitlerkin oikea johtaja, ja eri pätevä, niin että paras varoa; eihän tää ole muuta kuin lavakarismaa. “Älä kysy mitä maasi voi tehdä puolestasi, kysy mitä sä voit tehdä maasi puolesta.” Tämmöstä totalitääristä paskanjauhantaa. Myynnin ja markkinoinnin tieteet olivat vielä kuolaavissa lapsenkengissä 1961 kun Kennedy tän kekkasi. Nuoret ihmiset tinttijulisteineen ei olleet olleet markkinoinnin uhreja koko ikänsä. Ne ei tienneet mitään kierrepalloista. Ne eivät olleet totaalisen, karmean perillä mainosmiehistä.
    ellauri073.html on line 242: Pendelinä John Zieglerin naaman edessä, kiinni samanlaisessa säädettävässä varressa kuin eräät koululaisten pöytälamput, on Shure-merkkinen laajakulmamikki jonka ympärillä on harmaa kaiunpoistosukka pehmentämässä paukkuvia peitä ja sihiseviä kouruäänteitä.
    ellauri073.html on line 254: Hahaha look at you you fat fuck. You choose to spend your time bashing a man who has been dead for a decade, and there's no real reason for it other than the obvious jealousy that consumes you as an ugly person, inside and out. You break your criticism down into two distinctions: Foster's writing and his character. First, on your criticism of his character, I will say that it is entirely ironic that you choose to do so, considering that in your mediocre (that's right buddy your disgustingly fat ass as it is right now is entirely more mediocre than most unmistakably mediocre things, including (but not limited to) the entire Oakland Athletics organization) life your accomplishments include being - and here I'm just being honest with you, and it's possible that you may have heard this already in your pathetic, insufferable life but just hear me out -- LITERALLY THE FATTEST, BALDEST, AND JUST FLAT OUT UGLIEST PIECE OF SHIT PERSON I HAVE EVER SEEN. (For more on that here's a link to a picture I found of Matt online during a quick goggle search: https://www.google.com/sear....
    ellauri073.html on line 258: Really, I would have expected one of the first pictures I saw of Matt Fartey to be one of professional caliber, but interestingly enough the first thing that came up when I searched his name was that picture -- a picture so startling in all that it conveys that it was almost too much for me to witness its allure and then continue along on this tirade; luckily I am a man of strong willpower, and so I was able to continue writing after seeing that picture without shooting myself in the head.) Anyways where was I...oh that's right! Matt Fartey's "accomplishments" and character! Well ladies and gents, he runs a fucking hate blog. Enough said. I doubt he even earns much from it too, though he obviously earns enough to afford an adequate amount of fast food meals that will surely keep his little hate-filled body going until the age of 47, where he will surely die of a collapsed lung or heart attack. When they find his body he will be mistaken for Matt FOLEY, which will obviously be a total disparagement on the late Chris Farley. If you know, you know.
    ellauri073.html on line 260: Matt Foley is a fictional character from the sketch comedy program Saturday Night Live performed by Chris Farley (1964-1997). Foley is a motivational speaker who exhibits characteristics atypical of someone in that position: whereas motivational speakers are usually successful and charismatic, Foley is abrasive, clumsy, and down on his luck. The character was popular in its original run and went on to become one of Farley's best-known characters. Farley named the character after one of his Marquette University rugby union teammates, who is now a Roman Catholic priest in the Chicago suburb of Arlington Heights. Plans for a film version with Spade in a supporting role were shelved after Farley's death in 1997.
    ellauri073.html on line 262: Foley is disheveled, sweaty, obese, clumsy and unstylish. He exhibits poor social skills, frequently loses his temper, often disparages and insults his audience, and wallows in cynicism and self-pity about his own poor life choices, to which he often makes reference. Foley's trademark line is warning his audience that they could end up like himself: "35 years old, eating a steady diet of government cheese, thrice divorced, and living in a van down by the river!" In most sketches, whenever a member of his audience mentions a personal accomplishment, Foley responds with mockery: "Well, la-dee-frickin-da!", "Whoop-dee-frickin-doo!", or a similarly dismissive remark. The usual outfit of choice for Foley is a too-small blue-and-white plaid sport coat, a too-big white dress shirt, a solid green necktie, black horn-rimmed glasses, ill-fitting khakis which he is continually pulling up, a wristwatch, penny loafers, and slicked-down blond hair. In a prison sketch, he dons blue jeans and a denim shirt with the inmate number "3307" while retaining his watch, glasses and a crucifix necklace (he also mentions a "homemade tattoo of a van down by the river"). While working as a mall Santa in another sketch, he wears a stereotypical Santa outfit, complete with black snow boots.
    ellauri073.html on line 264: He overindulges in coffee and caffeine-based products and exhibits extreme hyperactivity as a result. In almost every appearance, Foley mentions drinking espresso or coffee, or taking NoDoz and even brings a duffel bag with a pot of coffee to the gym to teach a spinning class. His clients will often mention him either drinking coffee or eating coffee beans before calling him in to begin his presentation.
    ellauri073.html on line 265: Despite his otherwise bad attitude, Foley has a passion for his career as a motivational speaker, going as far as to travel to Venezuela to speak to teens. While serving a term in prison, Foley seems to be respected, and to have a good friendship with his cellmate Deshawn Powers, who refers to Foley as "The straight-up OG...of cell block three!".
    ellauri073.html on line 267: The character's debut performance (May 8, 1993) has been called one of the best segments in SNL history. The reception of the audience combined with visible stifled laughter from David Spade and Christina Applegate on stage added to the popularity of the sketch. Notable physical gestures from Farley included what Spade referred to as “the thing with the glasses” when Farley lifted his glasses on and off of his face commenting, “Hey Dad, I can’t see real good, is that Bill Shakespeare over there?” and perhaps the most defining gesture was one that Farley saved for the live performance when he alternated hands adjusting his trousers, grabbing the hilt of his belt with one hand and the back of his pants with the other.
    ellauri073.html on line 269: In the sketch itself, Foley attempts to motivate two teens, played by Spade and Applegate, to "get themselves back on the right track" after the family’s cleaning lady finds a bag of marijuana in their home. Foley’s attempt to motivate them falls short when he repeatedly insists that they're "not going to amount to jack squat" and will end up “living in a van down by the river!” Foley attempts to endear himself to Spade's character by telling him they're "gonna be buddies" and that everywhere he goes, Foley will follow. Comparing himself to Spade's shadow, Foley jumps about where he's standing and then dives into the coffee table, though he picks himself up moments later. None of the other cast members knew that Farley was going to do this and their startled reactions are genuine. The sketch ends with Foley offering that the only solution to solve the family's problems is for him to move in with them. Horrified, Applegate begs him not to, vowing never to smoke pot again. Even so, Foley leaves the house to get his things from his van and the family locks him out, finally reconciling and admitting to how much they love each other.
    ellauri073.html on line 271: A later performance (February 19, 1994) features Foley in prison attempting to motivate troubled teens in a scared straight program; he was imprisoned for three to five years for non-payment of alimony (consistent with him being “thrice divorced”). Before entering the sketch, Foley is introduced by his cellmate Deshawn Powers (Martin Lawrence) as “just finished a week in solitary, eating nothing but coffee beans.” Foley attempts to scare the juvenile delinquents by commenting in a slightly different manner that he “wished to dear God, that he was living in a van down by the river!” The sketch followed the usual Foley routine with him falling through the prison wall instead of a coffee table, which eventually led to his and the other inmates' escape.
    ellauri073.html on line 273: In the only cold open featuring Foley (April 15, 1995), the character attempts to motivate a pair of Venezuelan teens. Foley attempts to get through to them by motivating them in their native Spanish, saying “¡Yo vivo en van cerca de un rio!” However, the teenagers' father (Michael McKean) informs Matt that he and his children are fluent in English, to which Foley responds "¡Padre, dame un favor, y cállate su grande YAPPER!" The sketch again features Foley mocking his audience, breaking household objects, and somehow succeeding in his motivational goals.
    ellauri073.html on line 275: Quickly on your attacks on Wallace's writing style, I will mention that -- contrary to your rather baffling notions -- people did enjoy Infinite Jest and other works of his. They will continue to do so for decades. Listen Fartey: his work will live on. People recognize great writing wherever it materializes. Forget your distaste of footnotes, or your struggle in understanding the themes and ideals his work encompasses. His audience is clearly beyond you, so try to see that not everyone feels the same as you. You don't have to like his writing, but when you detract from it it makes it even more apparent that you are the lesser man. Your comments on Foster's writing ability led me to some of your other articles, and to be completely honest, it wasn't all bad. I genuinely enjoyed your "Fucking vs. Making Love" poetry bit, although it did seem like a cheap knockoff of Black Coffee Blues. Regardless, I can still acknowledge that the piece had its moments. However (and this is where I want you to pay attention you tub of lard), the piece can also be slammed in several areas. This is highly important, as we can see the parallels between this aspect of "Fucking vs. Making Love" and anything David Foster Wallace wrote. When it comes down to it, your writing can be criticized stylistically and formatically just like his can; the only difference is that there are few that actually give a shit about your writing, whereas Wallace's work is meaningful to the point where people have legitimate incentive to think critically about it. So defile it with your petty blog posts all you want, but at the end of the day you're the one who's only making yourself look bad, and as a heavily obese man based in Europe you are surely having few problems achieving this in the status quo, since Europeans are notably fatist.
    ellauri073.html on line 277: Remember this Fartey, for it will serve you well: There is nothing inherently admirable or intriguing in your choosing to complain about various outlets, activities, or people. It's mundane, tiresome, and has little uniqueness. Suffice it to say, there are a million of you, Matt Fartey (and when I say you I really mean babbling little shits). You will be forgotten; there is only one David Foster Wallace...so tell me, who's really the mediocre one here?
    ellauri073.html on line 300: Moni on miettinyt, että onko Immonen puuhissaan tosissaan. Rallienglanti ja Immosen vilpitön innostus hämäävät jopa yliopistotutkijoita. Esimerkiksi Koneen Säätiön rahoittaman Kertomuksen vaarat -projektin vetäjä, dosentti Maria Mäkelä kertoi Facebook-kirjoituksessaan luulleensa ensin Immosen videoita parodiaksi uusliberalistisesta puheesta. Dosentti Mäkelä kuvaa Immosen kiteyttävän uusliberalistisen mindset-puheen. Yes you can, sinä otat vastuun ja hoidat elämäsi kuntoon.
    ellauri073.html on line 317: Takakannessa lukee esimerkiksi: ”I have written this book for myself and for all people who want to live their lives completely and to the maximum, filled with happiness, power and energy” ja “Life in the modern world is fast-paced and frantic.”
    ellauri073.html on line 320: Kirjassa Immonen kehottaa elämään unelmaansa, eli “live the dream!” tässä nopeatahtisessa modernissa maailmassa, jossa ”aikaa ei koskaan tunnu olevan riittävästi”. Hän antaa erilaisia ohjeita aamukävelystä aina iltarutiinien muuttamiseen. “When you engage in a walk as a part of your morning routines, you have this good feeling, and you find it easy to purge your mind”, Immonen kirjoittaa kirjassa.
    ellauri073.html on line 357: Wallace's father said that David had suffered from major depressive disorder for more than 20 years and that antidepressant medication had allowed him to be productive. Wallace experienced severe side effects from the medication, and in June 2007, he stopped taking phenelzine, his primary antidepressant drug, on his doctor's advice. His depression recurred, and he tried other treatments, including electroconvulsive therapy. Eventually he went back on phenelzine but found it ineffective. On September 12, 2008, at age 46, Wallace wrote a private two-page suicide note to his wife, arranged part of the manuscript for The Pale King, and hanged himself from a rafter of his house.
    ellauri073.html on line 443: “seemed intuitively to sense that it was a matter not of reduction at all, but—perversely—of expansion, the aleatory flutter of uncontrolled, metastatic growth—each well-shot ball admitting of n possible responses, n-squared possible responses to those responses, and on into what Incandenza would articulate to anyone who shared both his backgrounds as a Cantorian continuum of infinities of possible move and response, Cantorian and beautiful because infoliating, contained, this diagnate infinity of infinities of choice and execution, mathematically uncontrolled but humanly contained, bounded by the talent and imagination of self and opponent, bent in on itself by the containing boundaries of skill and imagination that brought one player finally down, that kept both from winning, that made it, finally, a game, these boundaries of self.”
    ellauri073.html on line 451: But I’m not the boss of you. This is America—you can do whatever you want to. For example, you could start with some articles I’ve written for a variety of publications, including The New York Times Magazine and Hazlitt.
    ellauri073.html on line 456: Sasha Chapin oli näppyläinen ruma teini joka kompensoi esiintymällä älykkönä ja lukemalla 14-vuotiaana MLA:n 100 parhaan romskun listaa läpi aakkosissa kuin Jorma Oxanen Otavan isoa tietosanakirjaa ja Puu kasvaa Brooklynissä tyttö joka pääsi kaupunginkirjastossa A:sta Burtonin Melankoliaan. Mä luin samassa mielessä Rikhardinkadun kirjastossa EA Tunkelon Vepsän kielen äännehistorian. Se oli äsken divarissa myynnissä merkinnällä (lukematon). Vaikkei mulla teininä ollut juuri näppylöitäkään. Muuten kyllä olin nörtti väpelö. En sentään pilannut elämääni shakilla, kuten Sasha Chapin. Sasha huomas lopulta että sen paikka IQ-toteemipaalussa oli lähempänä paalun jalustaa. Se alkoi haista. Niin minäkin.
    ellauri073.html on line 540: David Foster Wallace became a regionally ranked tennis player while growing up in Illinois. David Foster Wallace´s thesis, The Broom of the System, that he wrote while at Amherst College was published in 1987 while he was attending graduate school. In 1989 David Foster Wallace´s short story collection titled Girl with Curious Hair was published. After graduating from the University of Arizona David went on to study philosophy at Harvard University but soon chose to leave. He moved to Syracuse to be with the poet and novelist Mary Karr. While in Syracuse David Foster Wallace wrote most of his famous novel Infinite Jest. The finished book was 1,100 pages long. The novel dealt with addiction, art, and consumerism, and was set in the near future.
    ellauri074.html on line 57: ONAN was a canary owned by writer Dorothy Parker, so named because he constantly spilled his seed.
    ellauri074.html on line 68: They are always confronting me with dresses, saying, “I made this myself.” They read Woman’s pages and try out the recipes.
    ellauri074.html on line 163: The Perdue Farms company was founded in 1920 by Arthur Perdue and his wife, Pearl Perdue, who had been keeping a small flock of chickens. The company started out selling eggs, then in 1925, Perdue built the company's first hatchery, and began selling layer chicks to farmers instead of only eggs for human consumption. His son Frank Perdue joined the company in 1939 at age 19 after dropping out of college. The company was incorporated as A.W. Perdue & Son and Frank Perdue assumed leadership in the 1950s. The company also began contracting with local farmers to raise its birds and supplying chickens for processing as well as opening a second hatchery in North Carolina during this period. Perdue entered the grain and oilseed business by building grain receiving and storage facilities and Maryland's first soybean processing plant. In 1968, the company began operating its first poultry processing plant in Salisbury. This move had two effects: it gave Perdue Farms full vertical integration and quality control over every step from egg and feed to market, as well as increasing profits which were being squeezed by processors. This move enabled the company to differentiate its product, rather than selling a commodity. In 2013, Perdue was reportedly the third-largest American producer of broilers (chickens for eating) and was estimated as having 7% of the US chicken production market, behind Pilgrim's Pride and Tyson Foods. Perdue antoi kanalle nimen tuotteistamalla sen. Poules Perdues.
    ellauri074.html on line 196: Year of the Whisper-Quiet Maytag Dishmaster 2006
    ellauri074.html on line 207: Most of the action in the novel takes place in the Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment, or Y.D.A.U., which is probably AD 2009, taking the Year of the Yushityu... (the lengthily titled 6th Subsidized Year) as 2007. Critic Stephen Burn, in his book on Infinite Jest, argues convincingly that Y.D.A.U. corresponds to 2009: the MIT Language Riots took place in 1997 (n. 24) and those riots occurred 12 years prior to Y.D.A.U. (n. 60).
    ellauri074.html on line 234: If you are interested in personal development or self-help you have heard of Tony Robbins. The self-made peak performance coach has been helping individuals become the best versions of themselves since the early 1980s. He has grown in popularity over his career through books, seminars, infomercials, and podcasts. All of these accomplishments have led Tony Robbins to have a net worth of $500 million dollars in 2021. In this post, we will discuss how Robbins has amassed his wealth and how you can do the same.
    ellauri074.html on line 236: Robbins was born in North Hollywood, California on February 29th, 1960. Robbins life was far from normal. His mother divorced his father at the age of 7 and when he was in high school Robbins grew 10 inches due to a pituitary tumor.
    ellauri074.html on line 237: He never had a stable household as he faced a lot of abuse growing up from his mother. Robbins recalls times when his mother would chase him out of the house with a knife and pour liquid soap down his throat. By the age of 17, he decided to leave home and never return. He never attended college and got a job as a janitor to make money. And how!
    ellauri074.html on line 239: One day, when speaking with his landlord, Tony was asking him how he got so successful. The landlord replied that he went to a Jim Rohn seminar (Rohn was a famous motivational speaker at the time). Robbins had no clue what a seminar was so he asked his landlord to explain. The landlord said that a seminar is when a man takes everything he’s learned over the years of his life, and he condenses his knowledge into four hours.
    ellauri074.html on line 240: Robbins was fascinated by the idea of a seminar however to attend a Jim Rohn seminar it costs $35. At the time, Robbins was only making $40 a week! However, he made the decision to spend a week’s pay to attend the seminar. Although it was a costly investment for him, it would end up changing his life.
    ellauri074.html on line 243: So, he approached Rohn after the seminar and asked to become his pupil. Rohn agreed, and over the next few years, Robbin was able to take the lessons he learned from Rohn and apply it to his own unique style. Robbins became an avid reader of psychology and incorporated many theories from behavioral psychology into his approach. Robbins perfected this approach through hundreds of seminars across North America and even did seminars for free to help perfect his craft. By the age of 26, Tony Robbins had a net worth of millions of dollars and was a best selling author.
    ellauri074.html on line 245: When Robbins started off doing his seminars, he implemented a strategy called Neurolinguistic Programming. Neurolinguistic Programming works under the belief that everyone has a personal map of reality. Nothing is neither good nor bad but thinking makes it so. Robbins would use this practice to help people realize that things that they think are impossible are possible, they just have to change their mindset.
    ellauri074.html on line 247: One way he would get people to do this is by making them do a firewalk over a bed of hot embers. Most people at his seminars normally thought that would be impossible. By showing them that they can walk on fire, it helped the attendees see that they had preconceived notions that weren’t true. (The trick is to wear thick-soled shoes with a huge carbon footprint.)
    ellauri074.html on line 250: Tony Robbins most notable seminar is now his Business Mastery seminar. In this seminar, he teaches business owners various growth strategies, systems, and resources that help them grow their business. These are the same strategies that industry leaders like Apple, Orange, Zippos, Zappos, American Express, and Facebook used to grow their companies.
    ellauri074.html on line 253: Hugh Michael Jackman is an Australian actor, singer, multi-instrumentalist, dancer and producer. Jackman has won international recognition for his roles in major films, notably as superhero, period, and romance characters. He is best known for his long-running role as Wolverine in the X-Men film series, as well as for his lead roles in the...
    ellauri074.html on line 255: Tony Robbins has written over six books throughout his career. (Over six? like almost seven?) His first book, Unlimited Power, was published in 1986 and became a national bestseller. He has also written many other great books such as Awaken The Giant Within, Notes From A Friend, MONEY Master the Game, Giant Steps, and Unshakeable.
    ellauri074.html on line 295: Antiikin filosofeista Ciorania kiehtoivat skeptikot ja kyynikot, erityisesti Diogenes Sinopelainen. Kaunokirjallisista teksteistä Cioran luki varsinkin Fjodor Dostojevskia ja Marcel Proustia sekä elämäkertoja. Pyhimyselämäkerrat ja mystikkofilosofit (varsinkin Pyhän Teresa Ávilalaisen tuotanto) olivat Cioranille erityisen rakkaita ja vaikuttivat merkittävästi hänen omiin teksteihinsä, varsinkin mystiseen käsitykseen ikävän luonteesta Cioran suhtautui historiaan intohimoisesti ja oli erityisen perehtynyt rappiokausien kirjailijoihin ja rappion teoreetikkoihin, kuten Oswald Spengleriin, jonka gnostilainen näkökulma ihmiskunnan kohtaloon ja sivilisaatioon vaikutti voimakkaasti Cioranin poliittiseen filosofiaan. Cioranin mukaan ihminen on voinut vastustaa rappiota niin kauan, kuin hän on pysynyt yhteydessä lähtökohtiinsa eikä ole irrottanut itseään omasta itsestään ja on ollut tekemättä mitään. Nyt ihmiskunta on matkalla kohti omaa tuhoaan, koska se on tehnyt itsestään objektin ja analysoi itseään loputtomiin. Cioran halveksi edistyksen ajatusta ja kuvitelmaa, että historia kuljettaisi ihmiskuntaa kohti suurempaa täydellisyyttä; siten Cioran myös vieroksui Hegeliä. Cioran oli tutustunut myös buddhalaiseen filosofiaan. Cioran tunsi suurta läheisyyttä Venäjää ja Espanjaa kohtaan, koska molemmat kansakunnat ovat menettäneet muinaisen mahtinsa ja koska uskonnollisella hurmoksella ja sen vastapainolla ateismilla on molemmissa maissa ollut niin suuri merkitys.
    ellauri074.html on line 309: Muita Cioranin tuotannolle ominaisia teemoja ovat muun muassa perisynti, historian traagisuus, sivilisaation loppu, uskon tuomasta lohdutuksesta kieltäytyminen, absoluutin pakkomielle ja elämä ihmisen metafyysisenä karkotuspaikkana. Jumalasta Cioran on sanonut, että Hän olisi täysin toisarvoinen, ellei Johann Sebastian Bachia olisi olemassa, ja että vain Bachin musiikki antaa oikeutuksen olla pitämättä maailmaa täysin epäonnistuneena. Toisaalta maailma ilman Jumalaa olisi pelkää olemattomuutta (tai tyhjyyttä), ja Jumala itse on ylin olemattomuus.
    ellauri074.html on line 313: William H. Gass (kekä?) on kuvaillut Cioranin tekstejä filosofiseksi romanssiksi, jossa toistuvat nykyajan teemat vieraantuminen, absurdius, ikävä, turhuus, rappio, historian hirmuvalta, muutoksen rahvaanomaisuus, tietoisuus kärsimyksestä ja järki sairauden muotona. Tuotannon pääosa koostuu ironisista, skeptisistä ja ytimekkäistä aforismeista tai vähän pidemmistä fragmenteista. Mieltymys fragmentteihin liittyy sekä systemaattisia järjestelmiä kaihtavaan ajatteluun että tuskalliseen kielen vaihtamiseen romaniasta ranskaksi ja jopa laiskuuteen. Cioran piti fragmenttejaan ajatteluprosessin yhteenvetona, josta on jätetty pois lopputulokseen johtanut päättelyketju. Cioranin ranskankieliset tekstit ovat äärimmäisen hiottuja ja klassisten kielinormien mukaisia; klassinen tyyli perustuu osittain myös pyrkimykseen kirjoittaa vähintään yhtä hyvin kuin ranskalaiset kirjailijat; Cioran pitikin tyyliään ainoana vahvuutenaan, joskin vahvuus ei ollut hänen mielestään luontaista vaan kovan työn tulos. Cioran on usein puhunut traumaattisesta kielen vaihtamisesta, johon hän päätyi kääntäessään Stéphane Mallarmén runoja romaniaksi ja todettuaan, ettei ollut mitään järkeä kirjoittaa kielellä, jota kukaan ei ymmärtänyt. Hän sanoo kirjoittaneensa Hajoamisen käsikirjan neljä kertaa, ennen kuin siitä tuli niin hiottu, ettei jälkeä muukalaisuudesta ("métèque" - siis metoikkimaisuudesta) enää ollut. Vaikka romaniaksi kirjoitetuissa teksteissä esiintyvät teemat ovat pääosin samoja kuin myöhemmin ranskaksi kirjoitetuissa, ei Cioran itse pitänyt niitä tyylillisesti yhtä korkeatasoisina kuin ranskaksi kirjoittamiaan tekstejä. Hän suhtautui erityisen varauksellisesti romaniankielisistä teksteistä tehtyihin käännöksiin, varsinkin ranskannoksiin: hän ei kokenut pitkällisen kirjallisen perinteen ja kielenhuollon pysähdyttämän ja jäykistämän ranskan kielen voivan ilmaista asioita samalla tavalla kuin slaavilaisuuden ja latinalaisuuden sekoituksessaan joustavan romanian kielen Romaniaksi Cioran kirjoitti vaistonvaraisesti, ranska oli hänelle kuin pakkopaita.
    ellauri074.html on line 327: Cioran ei kuitenkaan koskaan ollut fasistisen Rautakaartin (Garda de Fier) jäsen, vaikka hän kannattikin liikkeen nationalistista ideologiaa toisen maailmansodan ensi vuosiin saakka; tosin hän ei oletettavasti hyväksynyt ryhmän väkivaltaisia metodeja. Toisaalta jotkut historioitsijat pitävät Cioranin nuoruuden kiinnostusta äärioikeistolaisuuteen lähinnä teoreettisena. Pariisiin asetuttuaan Cioran hylkäsi täysin ideologian ja keskittyi kirjoittamiseen. Myöhemmin Cioran on useissa haastatteluissa syvästi katunut nuoruudenaikaista innostustaan äärioikeistolaisuuteen. Esimerkiksi vuonna 1972 antamassaan haastattelussa hän tuomitsi Rautakaartin ”sekalaiseksi ryhmittymäksi tai pikemminkin mielipuoliseksi lahkoksi ja puolueeksi” ja sanoi: ”Silloin tajusin – – mitä tarkoittaa, kun joutuu aallon mukaan ilman vähäisintäkään vakaumusta. – – Nyt olen sille immuuni.”
    ellauri074.html on line 399: G. A. Moore, Jr. is a retired Texas high school football head coach. He retired after completing the 2011 season with a career head coaching record of 426–92–9, which at the time was the most in Texas high school football history. Moore's win total was passed on November 3, 2016, by Phil Danaher of Calallen High School in Corpus Christi, Texas.
    ellauri074.html on line 424: katoavaa. Elämään saa mieltä kun harrastaa pyhistelyä ja rituaaleja jotka vahvistavat
    ellauri074.html on line 459: Ganzfried was a Hungarian Jew, and put the emphasis of his work on the customs of the Hungarian Jews of his time. The work is also known for its strict rulings.
    ellauri074.html on line 469: Sidney Gottlieb (August 3, 1918 – March 7, 1999) was an American chemist and spymaster best known for his involvement with the Central Intelligence Agency's 1950s and 1960s assassination attempts and mind-control program, known as Project MKUltra. The CIA MKUltra project was a continuation of the work begun in WWII-era Japanese facilities and Nazi concentration camps on subduing and controlling human minds.
    ellauri074.html on line 474: At least one death, the result of the defenestration of Dr. Frank Olson, was attributed to Olson's being subjected, unaware, to such experimentation, nine days before his death. Don't worry. Be happy. Leave pipe, socks, and shoes on the windowsill.
    ellauri074.html on line 649: Wallace was deeply suspicious of the media infrastructure that was, when he died, still largely known as “the Net”—“I allow myself to Webulize only once a week now,” he once told a grad student—and he remarked to his wife, as they were moving computer equipment into their house, “thank God I wasn't raised in this era.” Having written his first big stories on a Smith Corona typewriter, Wallace disliked digital drafts and e-publishing in general. He took particular pleasure in the fact that his house in Indiana, the one recreated in The End of the Tour, had the elegantly atavistic address of “Rural Route 2.” He preferred to file his students’ work not on computers, but in a pink Care Bears folder.
    ellauri074.html on line 656: A Tale of a Tub. Written for the Universal Improvement of Mankind. was the first major work written by Jonathan Swift, arguably his most difficult satire and perhaps his most masterly. William Wotton wrote that the Tale had made a game of "God and Religion, Truth and Moral Honesty, Learning and Industry" to show "at the bottom Jonathan´s contemptible Opinion of every Thing which is called Christianity." The work continued to be regarded as an attack on religion well into the nineteenth century. The overarching parody is of enthusiasm, pride, and credulity. It was widely misunderstood, especially by Queen Anne herself who purposely mistook its purpose for profanity. It effectively disbarred its author from proper preferment in the Church of England, but is considered one of Swift´s best allegories, even by himself.
    ellauri077.html on line 46: This article examines David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest alongside its eponymous film, arguing that they share a common purpose, but that the former succeeds where the latter fails. Coupled with a biographical and phenomenological analysis, the aim of this examination is to better understand Infinite Jest’s place in the cultural and literary movement away from post-modernism. Through the novel, Wallace seeks a cure for the postmodern malaise that is irony, which creates a distancing effect between author and reader. I argue that he collapses this distance by creating a conversation-like novel that uses sentimentality and endnotes to converse with a generation bombarded with easily consumable irony from television, advertisements, and even art. The results of this conversation are the curtailing of passive consumption of entertainment and the beginning of a new sincerity in literature, which allows for grand narratives without the unending cynicism of postmodernism.
    ellauri077.html on line 145: V. 2003, se julkaisi toisentyyppistä työtä. Kirjan nimi oli: 'Kaikki eikä siinä vielä kaikki: lyhyt äärettömyyden historia', joka käsittelee äärettömyden historiaa ja keskittyy etusijassa 19. vuosisadan saxalaisen matemaatikon Georg Cantorin töihin.
    ellauri077.html on line 162: Se oli ensin kieltäytynyt koska lauman edessä puhuminen ahisti. Ahistus jatkui päätösjuhlapäivään toukok. 21, 2005, 'suureen pelottavaan seremoniaan'. Wallu korjaili puhetta melkein viime tinkaan asti.
    ellauri077.html on line 207: But not all things emanating from this country move quite so quickly. Take, for instance, David Foster Wallace’s near-canonical mega-novel Infinite Jest: released in the States in 1996, it has in 20 years been translated into just five languages. (A sixth translation into Greek is currently in the works.) At this rate, it is moving only slightly faster than the massive Quixote, which had appeared in England, France, the Germanic territories, and Venice 20 years after its complete Castilian publication in 1615. However, Jest is massively behind the 3,600-page über-novel My Struggle, which—just 5 years after its complete Norwegian release—is available or forthcoming in over 20 languages.
    ellauri077.html on line 209: To determine precisely what forces have determined the globalization of David Foster Wallace’s magnum opus, I spoke to writers, translators, and publishers in eight countries familiar with the work and its multiple manifestations. This is what they told me (2016).
    ellauri077.html on line 213: Spanish literature remains conservative, and so Wallace it still a cult taste in Spain, even after his 2009 death.
    ellauri077.html on line 216: Once again, the preponderance of American culture in Germany makes Infinite Jest a book that is readily understood. (And at this point I can’t help but take glee in the inherently Wallacian irony that American capitalism’s blob-like smearing of the globalized world has prepared the way for a scathing critique of this very same capitalism contained, Trojan Horse-style, inside a recondite mega-novel.) Still, things get lost: Blumenbach said that he “annotated the text as far as I could, and the publishers put those sixty pages of annotations on their website for a while.”
    ellauri077.html on line 220: The French attributed the book’s great success to the French love of the “écrivain maudit” archetype, Wallace’s acerbic critique of America, and the myth that has grown up around the author: “A writer who seems to have been sacrificing his life on the altar of literature is seen as a hero.”
    ellauri077.html on line 255: Death system, a concept introduced by Robert Kastenbaum in 1977, is defined as "the interpersonal, sociocultural, and symbolic network through which an individual's relationship to mortality is mediated by his or her society" (Kastenbaum 2001, p. 66). Through this concept, Kastenbaum seeks to move death from a purely individual concern to a larger context, understanding the role of death and dying in the maintenance and change of the social order.
    ellauri077.html on line 267:
  • How Long is This Grieving Going to Last?
    ellauri077.html on line 276:
  • What About This Thing Called 'Acceptance'?
    ellauri077.html on line 294:
  • Oletko hyvis vai pahis?
    ellauri077.html on line 324: Figures such as Albert Camus defined Søren Kierkegaard as the philosopher of irony. Kierkegaard defended faith above all things, but he always criticized the Danish church. Although he rejected the love of his life, he never stopped loving her and she was the muse for most of his work. Mitä ironista tässä muka on?
    ellauri077.html on line 329: Another aspect that defined his thoughts was the concept that would later inspire the work of other great writers such as Kafka, Unamuno, or philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. We’re talking about "anxiety", the feeling that never disappears. This is because it also helps us become aware that there are more options in life, that we’re free to jump into the void or take a step back and seek other solutions, like happy homosexuality. There’s always an alternative to suffering, but suffering itself helps "it" grow.
    ellauri077.html on line 336: Näistä ahistuneista hepuista oli ainakin osa homoja tai vähintään 2-neuvosia. Oliko Unomuna tapaus pisteessä?
    ellauri077.html on line 358: Unomuna oli synnynnäinen baskiainen jonka lempinimi oli Pölö. Hän oli tuuliajolla: tiede ja rationalistinen filosofia ei vastannut sen syömmin kysymyxiin ja kirkon dogmaattinen rakenne oli epätyydyttävä ja pinnallinen sille. Järki ja usko olivat sotajalalla Unomunan rinnan alla. Yxi kirjoittaja sanoi osuvasti: "This is pure baloney."
    ellauri077.html on line 362: Desmond Morris, the author, who had been the curator of mammals at London Zoo, said his book was intended to popularise and demystify science.
    ellauri077.html on line 368: In February 1976, the book was removed from high school library shelves by the board of education of the Island Trees Union Free School District in New York. This case became the subject of a U.S. Supreme Court case in 1982.
    ellauri077.html on line 454: He is the author of the monograph Existentialist Engagement in Wallace, Eggers and Foer: A Philosophical Analysis of Contemporary American Literature (Bloomsbury 2015) – for more information about this book, see below. His work has appeared in different academic journals and collections (see Publications). Currently, he is working on a book tentatively titled Wallace’s Existentialist Intertexts: Comparative Readings with the Fiction of Kafka, Dostoevsky, Camus and Sartre.
    ellauri077.html on line 458: About Existentialist Engagement in Wallace, Eggers and Foer. The novels of David Foster Wallace, Dave Eggers and Jonathan Safran Foer are increasingly regarded as representing a new trend, an 'aesthetic sea change' in contemporary American fiction. 'Post-postmodernism' and 'New Sincerity' are just two of the labels that have been attached to this trend. But what do these labels mean? What characterizes and connects these novels?
    ellauri077.html on line 460: This study shows that the connection between these works lies in their shared philosophical dimension. On the one hand, they portray excessive self-reflection and endless irony as the two main problems of contemporary Western life. On the other hand, the novels embody an attempt to overcome these problems: sincerity, reality-commitment and community are portrayed as the virtues needed to achieve a meaningful life.
    ellauri077.html on line 462: This shared philosophical dimension is analyzed in this study by viewing the novels in light of the existentialist philosophies of Søren Kierkegaard, Jean-Paul Sartre, Ludwig Wittgenstein and Albert Camus. Pah taas näitä pahvikuvia ollaan ronttaamassa esille. Plus ca change, plus c´est la meme chose.
    ellauri077.html on line 472: Allardtilla ois viisi ristillistä aspektia (crucial aspects) jotka yhistää Wallua ja Sörsselssöniä:
    ellauri077.html on line 476:
  • that things go wrong when irony becomes permanent—Kierkegaard calls this the “aesthetic” attitude;
    ellauri077.html on line 477:
  • that liberation from this empty, aimless form of irony cannot be achieved through the ironizing of irony, i.e. meta-irony; and
    ellauri077.html on line 488: This also means that no positive content lies “behind” it, because existential irony places the totality of existence under negation, and, therefore, no possible meaning remains for it.
    ellauri077.html on line 492: Tässä menee hurjan helpolla puurot ja vellit sekaisin, heilahdetaan yhdestä äärimmäisyydestä toiseen. Suhteellisuudentaju merkkaa sitä, ettei toivotonkaan tilanne ole vakava. Tollanen posetiivari usein unohtaa tän totuuden ja luulee että on oltava jotain koskemattomia pyhiä arvoja. Ei pidä, pyhistely on perseestä. Kyllä ruumitakin syödään kun oikein nälkä tulee. Tai tehdään ihmisnahkasta lampunvarjostimia. Ei se paljon kummempaa oo kuin kaikenkarvaisten elukoiden ampuminen vaan six kun on kiva käyskennellä mezässä.
    ellauri077.html on line 494: Jenkkikirjailijoilla tietty omat lehmät purivat, niille postmodernismi oli jonkinlaista irtiriuhtomista supermiehistä, John Wayneistä ja Kennedyistä ja jenkkilän maailmanlaajuisista vital interesteistä. Mikä liittyi tietysti jenkkimaailmanvallan hitaaseen murenemiseen muun maailman kiriessä kiinni vakoa. Ironia oli sit sitä että näitä asenteita pilkattiin (vaikkei suinkaan niistä luovuttu). You smile so wide it hurts. Yx jenkkifilmien vituttavimpia klisheitä on toi "nauru läpi kyynelten", on hurjan urheata kun ei näytä pahaa mieltä vaan virnuilee esim jollekulle kuolevalle lapselle tms ja valehtelee sille eze paranee. Ilo pintaan vaikka syän märkänis. Siinähän sitä on ironiaa kerraxeen. Sanoo mitä ei tarkoita eikä tarkoita mitä sanoo. Puhasta valehtelua.
    ellauri077.html on line 555: In his interview with Larry McCaffery, Wallace shows he was aware of his failure to overcome the use of postmodern irony: “I got trapped just trying to expose the illusions of metafiction the same way metafiction had tried to expose the illusions of the pseudo-unmediated realist fiction that had come before it. It was a horror show.”
    ellauri077.html on line 571: 1This essay is an adapted version of a chapter of my dissertation,“Love Me Till My Hearts Stop.” Existentialist Engagement in Contemporary American Literature, a philosophical analysis of the fiction of David Foster Wallace. Tarkistuskysymys: Millä eläimellä on useita sydämiä? Entä puhuvia päitä?
    ellauri077.html on line 601: Wallace thought that his generation’s authors were also feeding a
    ellauri077.html on line 608: The U.S. arts are our guide to inclusion. A how-to. We are shown how to fashion masks of ennui and jaded irony at a young age where the face is fictile enough to assume the shape of whatever it wears. And then it’s stuck there, the weary cynicism that saves us from gooey sentiment and unsophisticated naïveté. Sentiment
    ellauri077.html on line 609: equals naïveté on this continent. (IJ 694)
    ellauri077.html on line 613: Wallace saw this (psycho) kind of writing as simply an example of self-love. Like the Onan whose name is another Wallu acronym-pun, these writers were working out of “the part that just wants to be loved” (i.e. the wiener) rather than “out of the part [. . .] that can love,” that is the “art’s heart”.
    ellauri077.html on line 621: If we take the Incandenza-wraith’s claim that “Infinite Jest” was his last, desperate attempt to reconnect with Hal, to “simply converse”(IJ 838, original emphasis), as fact, this means that the actual product does just the opposite of what it was meant to. It instead traps the viewer in a solipsistic cage out of which there seems to be no escape.
    ellauri077.html on line 627: This process does not lead to a passive, solely pleasurable experience such as taking a drug or watching television. Instead, what awaits that reader is a book that forces her “‘to work hard to access its pleasures, the same way that in real life true pleasure is usually a by-product of hard work and discomfort’” (McCaffery 119). Perhaps the most difficult aspect of Infinite Jest (and the one for which it is fated to be infamously known) is the use of endnotes, which will be our entry into thinking of Infinite Jest as a conversation-text.
    ellauri077.html on line 683: Einer qualitativen Studie zufolge sind die Monologe dabei zumeist affirmativ auf die Vorredner bezogen. Verbalisierter Dissens sei selten, aber wichtig, um biographisch begründete kognitive Dissonanzen aufzulösen. Die Affirmation sei dabei wichtig, um die Kollektividentitäten zu stärken und damit Solidarität zu fördern. Dissens würde dagegen nur vorsichtig und zumeist indirekt vorgebracht.
    ellauri077.html on line 717:
  • Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.
    ellauri077.html on line 754: The Stoics taught that we should accept whatever is outside our control. “Do you really think you can make a bad situation any worse by complaining about it?” Yes we can! I have tried to make this my own practice, and have tried to complain about things that happen. But not out loud! Marcus Aurelius said: “Don’t be overheard complaining… Not even to yourself.” Mutter your complaints under your breath.
    ellauri077.html on line 794: Pretentious diction. Words like phenomenon, element, individual (as noun), objective, categorical, effective, virtual, basic, primary, promote, constitute, exhibit, exploit, utilize, eliminate, liquidate , are used to dress up a simple statement and give an aire of scientific impartiality to biased judgements. Adjectives like epoch-making, epic, historic, unforgettable, triumphant, age-old, inevitable, inexorable, veritable, are used to dignify the sordid process of international politics, while writing that aims at glorifying war usually takes on an archaic color, its characteristic words being: realm, throne, chariot, mailed fist, trident, sword, shield, buckler, banner, jackboot, clarion.
    ellauri077.html on line 798: The jargon peculiar to Marxist writing (hyena, hangman, cannibal, petty bourgeois, these gentry, lackey, flunkey, mad dog, White Guard , etc.) consists largely of words translated from Russian, German, or French; but the normal way of coining a new word is to use Latin or Greek root with the appropriate affix and, where necessary, the size formation. It is often easier to make up words of this kind (deregionalize, impermissible, extramarital, non-fragmentary and so forth) than to think up the English words that will cover one´s meaning. The result, in general, is an increase in slovenliness and vagueness.
    ellauri077.html on line 800: Orwell´s confusing approach to matters of social decorum—on the one hand expecting a working-class guest to dress for dinner, and on the other, slurping tea out of a saucer at the BBC canteen—helped stoke his reputation as an English eccentric.
    ellauri077.html on line 804: Meaningless words. In certain kinds of writing, particularly in art criticism and literary criticism, it is normal to come across long passages which are almost completely lacking in meaning. Words like romantic, plastic, values, human, dead, sentimental, natural, vitality , as used in art criticism, are strictly meaningless, in the sense that they not only do not point to any discoverable object, but are hardly ever expected to do so by the reader. When one critic writes, "The outstanding feature of Mr. X's work is its living quality," while another writes, "The immediately striking thing about Mr. X's work is its peculiar deadness," the reader accepts this as a simple difference opinion. If words like black and white were involved, instead of the jargon words dead and living, he would see at once that language was being used in an improper way.
    ellauri077.html on line 808: It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Petain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality.
    ellauri077.html on line 853: I too feel there is something bigger than myself. In fact anything I fit in is bigger than myself. My bed, my tub, my car, my yard, my city and country, this ball of dirt I inhabit, the space around it, the universe are all bigger than me, more or less.
    ellauri077.html on line 865: Why is it that people want this kind of shelter against failure. That they fit in. Tight enough, but also big enough, with some leeway and freedom and the feeling of being free at least in some respect, other than the duty. Duty line and nothing-to-declare green line. Snakes can well eat bigger things than their heads.
    ellauri077.html on line 867: Why is it that the Oedipus has a bigger head than is healthy for him? Why seeing him makes me like a vaccinated cell seeing a virus that I am vaccinated against, but still claustrophobic. I must put my fatherly upper jaw on his head, like the male lion does to the mare, and like a snakely Laertes slip my lower jaw under his pimply chin and swallow. The problem is I cannot do it: he is not my own son, but the son of my wife, and that would be murder. So I just keep my upper jaw symbolically and quietly on his crown like a crown. and suffer this corona. My vaccination took a year of pain, and this is just a chimera of that constant pain.
    ellauri078.html on line 34: Infinity is something we are introduced to in our math classes, and later on we learn that infinity can also be used in physics, philosophy, social sciences, etc. Infinity is characterized by a number of uncountable objects or concepts which have no limits or size. This concept can be used to describe something huge and boundless. It has been studied by plenty of scientists and philosophers of the world, since the early Greek and early Indian epochs. In writing, infinity can be noted by a specific mathematical sign known as the infinity symbol (∞) created by John Wallis, an English mathematician who lived and worked in the 17th century.
    ellauri078.html on line 48: Curves that have been called a lemniscate include three quartic plane curves: the hippopede or lemniscate of Booth, the lemniscate of Bernoulli, and the lemniscate of Gerono. The study of lemniscates (and in particular the hippopede) dates to ancient Greek mathematics, but the term "lemniscate" for curves of this type comes from the work of Jacob Bernoulli in the late 17th century.
    ellauri078.html on line 52: The infinity symbol (∞) represents a line that never ends. The common sign for infinity, ∞, was first time used by Wallis in the mid 1650s. He also introduced 1/∞ for an infinitesimal which is so small that it can’t be measured. Wallis wrote about this and numerous other issues related to infinity in his book Treatise on the Conic Sections published in 1655. The infinity symbol looks like a horizontal version of number 8 and it represents the concept of eternity, endless and unlimited. Some scientists say, however, that John Wallis could have taken the Greek letter ω as a source for creating the infinity sign.
    ellauri078.html on line 80: Dickinson´s verse is often associated with common meter, which is defined by alternating lines of eight syllables and six syllables (8686) or Iambic Tetrameter alternating with Iambic Trimeter. This pattern–one of several types of metrical “feet”–is known as an “iamb.” Common meter is often used in sung music, especially hymns (think “Amazing Grace” of "Yellow Roses of Texas").
    ellauri078.html on line 103: The earliest known version is found in Christy's Plantation Melodies. No. 2, a songbook published under the authority of Edwin Pearce Christy in Philadelphia in 1853. Christy was the founder of the blackface minstrel show known as the Christy's Minstrels. Like most minstrel songs, the lyrics are written in a cross between a parody of a generic creole dialect historically attributed to African-Americans and standard American English. The song is written in the first person from the perspective of an African-American singer who refers to himself as a "darkey," longing to return to "a yellow girl" (that is, a light-skinned, or bi-racial woman born of African/African-American and European-American progenitors)
    ellauri078.html on line 135: Emily Elizabeth Dickinson was born in Amherst, Massachusetts, on December 10, 1830 to Edward and Emily (Norcross) Dickinson. At the time of her birth, Emily’s father was an ambitious young lawyer. Educated at Amherst and Yale, he returned to his hometown and joined the ailing law practice of his father, Samuel Fowler Dickinson. Edward also joined his father in the family home, the Homestead, built by Samuel Dickinson in 1813. Active in the Whig Party, Edward Dickinson was elected to the Massachusetts State Legislature (1837-1839) and the Massachusetts State Senate (1842-1843).
    ellauri078.html on line 137: Between 1852 and 1855 he served a single term as a representative from Massachusetts to the U.S. Congress. In Amherst he presented himself as a model citizen and prided himself on his civic work—treasurer of Amherst College, supporter of Amherst Academy, secretary to the Fire Society, and chairman of the annual Cattle Show. Comparatively little is known of Emily’s mother, who is often represented as the passive wife of a domineering husband. Her few surviving letters suggest a different picture, as does the scant information about her early education at Monson Academy. Academy papers and records discovered by Martha Ackmann reveal a young woman dedicated to her studies, particularly in the sciences.
    ellauri078.html on line 141: By Emily Dickinson’s own account, she delighted in all aspects of the school—the curriculum, the teachers, the students. The school prided itself on its connection with Amherst College, offering students regular attendance at college lectures in all the principal subjects— astronomy, botany, chemistry, geology, mathematics, natural history, natural philosophy, and zoology. As this list suggests, the curriculum reflected the 19th-century emphasis on science. That emphasis reappeared in Dickinson’s poems and letters through her fascination with naming, her skilled observation and cultivation of flowers, her carefully wrought descriptions of plants, and her interest in “chemic force.” Those interests, however, rarely celebrated science in the same spirit as the teachers advocated.
    ellauri078.html on line 143: In an early poem, she chastised science for its prying interests. Its system interfered with the observer’s preferences; its study took the life out of living things. In “‘Arcturus’ is his other name” she writes, “I pull a flower from the woods - / A monster with a glass / Computes the stamens in a breath - / And has her in a ‘class!’” At the same time, Dickinson’s study of botany was clearly a source of delight. She encouraged her friend Abiah Root to join her in a school assignment: “Have you made an herbarium yet? I hope you will, if you have not, it would be such a treasure to you.” She herself took that assignment seriously, keeping the herbarium generated by her botany textbook for the rest of her life.
    ellauri078.html on line 145: Behind her school botanical studies lay a popular text in common use at female seminaries. Written by Almira H. Lincoln, Familiar Lectures on Botany (1829) featured a particular kind of natural history, emphasizing the religious nature of scientific study. Lincoln was one of many early 19th-century writers who forwarded the “argument from design.” She assured her students that study of the natural world invariably revealed God. Its impeccably ordered systems showed the Creator’s hand at work.
    ellauri078.html on line 147: Dickinson found the conventional religious wisdom the least compelling part of these arguments. From what she read and what she heard at Amherst Academy, scientific observation proved its excellence in powerful description. The writer who could say what he saw was invariably the writer who opened the greatest meaning to his readers. While this definition fit well with the science practiced by natural historians such as Hitchcock and Lincoln, it also articulates the poetic theory then being formed by a writer with whom Dickinson’s name was often later linked. In 1838 Emerson told his Harvard audience, “Always the seer is a sayer.”
    ellauri078.html on line 151: Dickinson left the academy at the age of 15 in order to pursue a higher, and for women, final, level of education. In the fall of 1847 Dickinson entered Mount Holyoke Female Seminary. Under the guidance of Mary Lyon, the school was known for its religious predilection. Part and parcel of the curriculum were weekly sessions with Lyon in which religious questions were examined and the state of the students’ faith assessed. The young women were divided into three categories: those who were “established Christians,” those who “expressed hope,” and those who were “without hope.” Much has been made of Emily’s place in this latter category and of the widely circulated story that she was the only member of that group. Years later fellow student Clara Newman Turner remembered the moment when Mary Lyon “asked all those who wanted to be Christians to rise.” Emily remained seated. No one else did. Turner reports Emily’s comment to her: “‘They thought it queer I didn’t rise’—adding with a twinkle in her eye, ‘I thought a lie would be queerer.’“
    ellauri078.html on line 161: Emmy ei ollut mikään siivooja. Se ei pitänyt pölyhuiskasta. No ei imurikaan ole yhtään parempi. Seija tempaisi imurin luukkua niin että muovisarana katkesi. Ei siitä enää tule kalua. Emmy oli witty kuten Lizzy Bennettin äiti, mutta pitikö se ize witeistä? VITTE, VITTEE, E-EE-O! lauloi merikapteeni Fuck Löfgren miehistöineen Paimiosta eli Heikki Silvennoinen Kummeleissa. Was Emily gay? None of business sanoo tylysti Quoran vastaaja, mut of you insist, yes in all probability she was. Her companion was her sister-in-law Gilbert. Proustillakin oli Gilberte, ja Albertine. Kirjailijat joilla on jotain sanottavaa on usein poikkeavia.
    ellauri078.html on line 178: I sacrifice them to his Blood. vain rihkaman on arvoinen. Mä uhraan ne sen verelle.
    ellauri078.html on line 180: 3. See from his Head, his Hands, his Feet, 3. Oi ihmeellinen armahdus! Kazo kun sen päästä, käsistä ja jaloista
    ellauri078.html on line 186: Spreads o'er his Body on the Tree; hetkellä suuren sovinnon. levii sen ruumiin päälle puussa;
    ellauri078.html on line 228:

    Wallu on ahistunut nahistunut narsisti


    ellauri078.html on line 320: This is the Sun's objective, Tää on auringon objektiivi
    ellauri079.html on line 37: Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions is a satirical novella by the English schoolmaster Edwin Abbott Abbott, first published in 1884 by Seeley & Co. of London. Written pseudonymously by "A Square", the book used the fictional two-dimensional world of Flatland to comment on the hierarchy of Victorian culture, but the novella's more enduring contribution is its examination of dimensions. This book was taught in Wallace's Tennis Academy. It's actually quite boring if you ask me. Be there or be square.
    ellauri079.html on line 109: Jethro is the only surviving member of the family and has had his fair share of ups and downs since being on the show. He never really reached the level of stardom that he wanted and instead went on to be a producer and a director, as he had 6yrs of school and his uncle owned the studio. After a while he had the idea to create a Beverly Hillbillies-themed casino out of a WalMart but failed. The second attempt is still currently suspended. He’s hopeful that he’ll get things going again.
    ellauri079.html on line 113: If Jed Clampett hadn’t done another role in his life he would have still been remembered as Jed Clampett more likely than not. After his time on the show he went on to continue acting here and there but nothing ever really brought him the same kind of fame as he experienced while being Jed. He did manage to get a cameo in the film version of the Beverly Hillbillies but apart from that he was retired at that time and wasn’t doing much at all. He passed away due to respiratory failure in 2003.
    ellauri079.html on line 115: Ellie May Clampett was unable to do much more in getting her career to take off. She went on to become a gospel singer for a while and even practiced real estate for a bit. But nothing ever really kept her from going back to show business as she felt that this was where she belonged. Ellie May passed away from pancreatic cancer in 2015.
    ellauri079.html on line 122: A lot of fans will remember this awkward but funny family from TV and probably be able to sing the theme song without having to hear it. The Beverly Hillbillies were after all a favorite show back in their day and inspired a lot of other ideas that came much later, like David Foster Wallace´s magnum opus The Infinite Jest. The attempt to make a movie out of the show wasn’t all that successful and kind of left a bad taste in a lot of peoples’ mouths since it was such a poor attempt that even watching the trailer was something that people didn’t want to admit for a while. Sometimes the best thing you can do is remember the good times and think back to the original that made it something special. Lets hope they will never, never try to make a movie out of Infinite Jest. Jim Incandenza tried that once already, with singularly bad results.
    ellauri079.html on line 131:

    Amherstin historia


    ellauri079.html on line 137: Wampum is a traditional shell bead of the Eastern Woodlands tribes of Native Americans. It includes white shell beads hand fashioned from the North Atlantic channeled whelk shell and white and purple beads made from the quahog or Western North Atlantic hard-shelled clam. Before European contact, strings of wampum were used for storytelling, ceremonial gifts, and recording important treaties and historical events, such as the Two Row Wampum Treaty or The Hiawatha Belt. Wampum was also used by the northeastern Indian tribes as a means of exchange, strung together in lengths for convenience. The first Colonists adopted it as a currency in trading with them. Eventually, the Colonists applied their technologies to more efficiently produce wampum, which caused inflation and ultimately its obsolescence as currency.
    ellauri079.html on line 145: Amherst is also infamous for recommending, in a letter to a subordinate, the use of smallpox-covered blankets in warfare against the Native Americans along with any "other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execrable Race".
    ellauri079.html on line 147: For this reason, there have been occasional ad hoc movements to rename the town. Suggested new names have included "Emily", after Emily Dickinson.
    ellauri079.html on line 180: Alanootti 123 on pelkkää teinipoikamaista pöyhistelyä. Ei se väliarvo ole mikään keskiarvo. Sitäpaizi lähtöoletuxet on alkaa päälle älyttömiä, ei pelaajien pelisuoritusten joukko ole jatkuva, se on äärellinen joukko arvoja, jotka voi heitellä ihan vapaasti. Eli meillä ei ole mitään jatkuvaa saati derivoituvaa äffää annettuna. Tää nootti on yxinkertaisesti vaan paskaa, typerää sumutusta, sori "Wall-e". Mutta oireellista on että "Wall-e" kiskoo tässä mukaan peliteoriaa. Se on talousliberaalien mieluisin lyömäase.
    ellauri079.html on line 184: Tää ikävystyttävä jaxo Wallun kirjassa on suoraa coveria sen seniorikollegalta Nipsulta. Erittäinkin haukotuttavaa. Sitäpaizi vanhahtavaa, kun Njeuvostoliitto on jo historiaa. Minnekkäs Kiina jäi? Ai se on kai toi PUNKII. Kyl on vanhahtavia nimityxiä. Jos Wallu eläisi tänä päivänä sillä olisi kalju ja sen yli kammatut naismaisen pitkät ohimohiuxet kaljun peittona kuten Kimmolla tai sen Taavi-enolla. Muze ei elä, eikä sen isä eikä äitikään.
    ellauri079.html on line 218: In this article, we contend that due to their size and emphasis upon addressing external social concerns, the corporate relationship between social enterprises, social awareness and action is more complex than whether or not these organisations engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR). This includes organisations that place less emphasis on CSR as well as other organisations that may be very proficient in CSR initiatives, but are less successful in recording practices. In this context, we identify a number of internal CSR (...)
    ellauri079.html on line 223: Recent events have raised concerns about the ethical standards of public and private organisations, with some attention falling on business schools as providers of education and training to managers and senior executives. This paper investigates the nature of, motivation and commitment to, ethics tuition provided by the business schools. Using content analysis of their institutional and home websites, we appraise their corporate identity, level of engagement in socially responsible programmes, degree of social inclusion, and the relationship to their ethics teaching. (...)
    ellauri079.html on line 238: In this article, the ability of partnerships to generate goods that enhance the quality-of-life of socially and economically deprived urban communities is explored. Drawing on Rawl's study on social justice [Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge)] and Sen's capabilities approach [Sen, A.: 1992, Inequality Re-Examined (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA); 1999, Development as Freedom (Oxford University Press, Oxford); 2009, The Idea of Justice (Ellen Lane, London)], we undertake an ethical evaluation of the effectiveness of different (...)
    ellauri079.html on line 243: This book aims to recast the way we think about ethics by defending an alternative to more conventional approaches and illustrating its plausibility through detailed discussions of several important cases. The book is styled as an attack on “Plato’s Thesis”.
    ellauri079.html on line 277: In Quandaries and Virtues, Edmund Pincoffs maintains that we observe a multiplicity of moral norms. A common life in which we participate supplies a context in which many virtues play diverse functional roles. He suggests, without developing the idea, that such a common life provides us with a structure for organizing and harmonizing the many moral norms we attempt to pursue. This essay explores that idea. Bodies of shared practical knowledge, such as medicine and scientific research, provide examples of empirically (...)
    ellauri079.html on line 302: The view that we immediately produce actions in our central nervous system has the consequence that our voluntary motions are entirely caused by sequences of events that we initiate unknowingly, events over which we can exercise control over only indirectly. This view, I shall argue below, is unsatisfactory.
    ellauri080.html on line 67: Mikäs se history">sangviininen olikaan kreikaxi? Hematoidiko?
    ellauri080.html on line 119: Many contemporary personality psychologists believe that there are five basic dimensions of personality, often referred to as the "Big 5" personality traits. The five broad personality traits described by the theory are extraversion (also often spelled extroversion), agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and positivity (well, neuroticity, just this one expressed negatively, I don't know why).
    ellauri080.html on line 135: This trait features characteristics such as imagination and insight. People who are high in this trait also tend to have a broad range of interests. They are curious about the world and other people and eager to learn new things and enjoy new experiences.
    ellauri080.html on line 139: People who are high in this trait tend to be more adventurous and creative. People low in this trait are often much more traditional and may struggle with abstract thinking.
    ellauri080.html on line 166: Standard features of this dimension include high levels of thoughtfulness, good impulse control, and goal-directed behaviors. Highly conscientious people tend to be organized and mindful of details. They plan ahead, think about how their behavior affects others, and are mindful of deadlines.
    ellauri080.html on line 238: This personality dimension includes attributes such as trust, altruism, kindness, affection, and other prosocial behaviors. People who are high in agreeableness tend to be more cooperative while those low in this trait tend to be more competitive and sometimes even manipulative.
    ellauri080.html on line 266: Positivity is a trait characterized by gladness, happiness, and emotional stability. Those hig in this trait tend to be more stable and emotionally resilient. Individuals who are low in this trait tend to experience mood swings, anxiety, irritability, and sadness.
    ellauri080.html on line 295: McCrae and his colleagues have also found that the big five traits are also remarkably universal. One study that looked at people from more than 50 different cultures found that the five dimensions could be accurately used to describe personality.
    ellauri080.html on line 299: Based on this research, many psychologists now believe that the five personality dimensions are not only universal; they also have biological origins. Psychologist David Buss has proposed that an evolutionary explanation for these five core personality traits, suggesting that these personality traits represent the most important qualities that shape our social landscape.
    ellauri080.html on line 363: Self-directedness (self-concept) is one of the three aspects of human character in Cloninger’s biopsychosociospiritual model of personality (Cloninger et al. 1993). This character trait involves a person’s sense of responsibility, hopeful purpose, self-acceptance, self-actualization, and resourcefulness (Cloninger 2004). See Cooperativeness and Self-transcendence for the other two aspects of human character.
    ellauri080.html on line 375: If this describes you as well as it described me, you’ve come to the right place! In this piece, we will define self-transcendence, look at its components and characteristics, think of some examples, and explore how it can be achieved.
    ellauri080.html on line 383: That “something higher” is often divine or spiritual in nature. Many achieve self-transcendence through their faith in God, while others may achieve it through recognition of some system of spirituality or idea of the soul. This faith or spirituality can help individuals find the meaning that will fulfill them and propel them to transcendence. Research has even shown that in elderly patients, the caregiver’s own spirituality had a positive impact on the patient’s well-being (Kim, Reed, Hayward, Kang, & Koenig, 2011).
    ellauri080.html on line 396: Biological rhythm: regular kids will easily stick to a routine. even toilet around the same time each day. This makes it easy for parents to have a predictable routine.
    ellauri080.html on line 422: Anyone who has studied the psychology of Carl Jung will be aware of his development of a system to differentiate the human psychological condition into four fundamental psychological types: intuition, thinking, sensation, and feeling – which is a further elaboration of his separation of personalities into two distinct attitudinal types: introvert and extrovert. But why did he choose just four psychological types? And of all the multitude of possible personality characteristics or modes of operation and approaches to life, why did he choose these four: intuition, sensation, thinking, and feeling?
    ellauri080.html on line 431: It seems to be a natural tendency of human nature to want to categorize the infinite variety of phenomenological reality into neat, distinct, and useful components. We have types and varieties from every area of human experience. There is some security when confronted by a brand new situation to be able to instantly ascribe this novelty to a pre-arranged mental coding system. Once we have categories we can describe differences and similarities – we can form hypotheses of relationship. This can be both useful and destructive, as unnecessary stereotyping leads to a relativizing of uniqueness. Jung walks this thin line by simply stating, “In my practical medical work with nervous patients I have long been struck be the fact that besides the many individual differences in human psychology there are also typical differences.”
    ellauri080.html on line 435: He was well aware of the difficulty of presenting a general description of types and its inability to draw an absolutely correct picture. Still, his wealth of empirical evidence led him to deduce as ‘factual’ the existence of distinct types. This deduction was made many times before him and is a simple reflection of the nature of reality (the reality of Nature).
    ellauri080.html on line 441: The introvert will give ultimate significance to subjective, inner experience and will tend to assign importance to what is happening externally only as it related to this inner experience, or only if it will lead to personal growth. The extravert, contrarily, will give ultimate significance to what is happening externally in the objective, outer world and will assign very little importance or completely disregard inner experience, unless it could lead to outer growth. These are obviously two diametrically opposed yet complementary approaches to life, reminiscent of the oriental Yin (introversion) and Yang (extraversion).
    ellauri080.html on line 479: In general, the nature of the judging axes can be described in this way:
    ellauri080.html on line 486: This is the primary basis for the philosophical conflicts between Fe/Ti and Te/Fi. This is demonstrated nicely by two quotes from famous philosophers representing each worldview:
    ellauri080.html on line 492: This relates directly to CelebrityTypes’ observation of “NTP Knowing and NTJ Willing”, though my proposition is that this in fact applies across all types in the form of these judging axes, albeit with varying degrees of appearance. I believe that in the sense above, the FE/TI axis is more naturally wired to seek abstract knowledge, while TE/FI is more naturally wired to make concrete its visionary will.
    ellauri080.html on line 498: These two views of the world are, of course, mutually inimical — they inevitably chase each other’s tails. Nietzsche says to Hume: ‘he stole that bread because he wanted to feed his family,’ to which Hume replies, ‘yes, that is true: but why did he want to feed his family? Because he is adhering to a familial principle,’ to which Nietzsche replies, ‘I suppose you could put it that way, but why is he operating according to that principle? It’s because he wants to, because he loves his family,’ to which Hume replies, ‘yes, but why does he love his family? It’s because that is his logical worldview…’ And so on.
    ellauri080.html on line 504: In general, the nature of the perceiving axes can be described this way:
    ellauri080.html on line 514: On the NI side, a good example would be Karl Marx, who spent hours upon hours researching and observing social and economic conditions in society, from which data he developed his comprehensive theories of capital and dialectical materialism. On the SE side, a good example is Dale Carnegie, who, as CelebrityTypes pointed out in one of their function axes articles, is one of many SE types who concretize their wealth of experiences into practical wisdom, such as ‘How to Win Friends and Influence People’.
    ellauri080.html on line 520: A good example of this mentality can be found in the theories of Michel Foucault, who himself describes society as a series of power structure grids you can lay on top of the truth in order to reveal some things but conceal others, and our goal essentially should be to experiment with various power grids to discover the true limits or bounds of how human society can successfully be structured. Another example could be Martin Heidegger’s discussion of Being or existence, and how many different perspectives are required to observe it and get a full picture, because of our extremely subjective position in relation to the nature of our own existence, not to mention existence within the ever shifting realm of time.
    ellauri080.html on line 524: Overall, SE/NI is much more trusting of what we could call empirical or collected data, particularly data from direct experience, which is why, as CelebrityTypes was the first to point out, it tends to feel much more “intense and singular” of vision, because it is perfectly happy with direct observation and direct conjecture from the collected data. As CelebrityTypes says, “The person will stress one point of view (Ni), which is indeed frequently the viewpoint that generates the greatest yield here and now (Se). The singularity of observation involved will frequently lend a manifest and immediate quality to the SE/NI type’s observations, which in turn tends to make them convincing.” This is because SE/NI is naturally hooked into and derived from a direct and photographic view of the world.
    ellauri080.html on line 526: A dominant NI type, for instance, is constantly conjecturing from whatever data they have: it’s what they do, and that’s why these types will often feel like they have a lot to say on topics regardless of their expertise, because they can still conjecture an intriguing point of view from what little data they have; of course, depending on their skill, luck, and their sample size, it is not uncommon for their ‘lines of best fit’, as it were, to be off by some degree. In fact, Ni types are often used to this and, at least in my experience, can sometimes conjecture about how accurate their own conjectures are likely to be. Se conjecture like this too, believe it or not, just not as consistently, but it is part of what can lend that peculiar air of surety or confidence to the ESTP’s speech, or the driven spontaneity of the ESFP’s decisions. These types feel that they see something before them in glorious clarity and sharpness. How long that vision will last varies.
    ellauri080.html on line 528: Meanwhile, the NE/SI axis is not so trusting of direct experience, which is hardly a mystery, because their perception of reality is introverted, meaning they aren’t interested in direct and photographic reality, but in the ideal versions of experiences abstracted from reality (e.g. Socrates’ search for the overarching ‘idea’ of everyday things like dogs, beds, piety, etc., as opposed to individual instances of these things). This is why, as CelebrityTypes also points out, “The person will also be more careful and meticulous (SI) because there is an unconscious striving to contribute one’s observations to building a system which is valid not just in the here and now, but which is perceived to be true in general: To generate the type of knowledge that could conceivably end up in a future textbook on the subject.” The axis makes use of Ne’s multifaceted nature to accomplish this.
    ellauri080.html on line 530: This helps illuminate a number of characteristics of SI and NE individually: dominant SI types focus their energy on the apprehension and upholding of the Truth as it is carefully and cautiously composited and systematically tested for weaknesses; hence, their stereotypically thorough, cautious, and reserved nature, and why they are not so sure in idea-based conversation as Ni types: because of just that — they aren’t sure. Meanwhile, dominant NE types, focusing their energy on the exploration and experimentation from various angles, have the same presence of doubt, which is why NE types so often eschew dogma and may be perceived as intellectually ‘flakey’ or ‘capricious’ because they never truly commit to anything: it’s all experimentation and exploration, forming a composite Truth, though their trouble is they never want to stop. The SI’s trouble, on the other hand, is that they don’t want to start.
    ellauri080.html on line 532: Concerning John Maynard Keynes, an INTJ, it was said: “[He spoke] on a great range of topics, on some of which he was thoroughly an expert, but on others [he had] derived his views from the few pages of a book at which he had happened to glance. The air of authority was the same in both cases.” Meanwhile, Bertrand Russell famously said that “The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.” Coincidentally, history records a number of ENTPs and INTJs very much disliking each other.
    ellauri080.html on line 540: Keynes's obituary in The Times included the comment: "There is the man himself – radiant, brilliant, effervescent, gay, full of impish jokes ... He was a humane man genuinely devoted to the cause of the common good." Kuulostaa Wallun äiskältä, wickedly funny. Ja gay. Ize asiassa gay pedophile kaiken kukkuraxi. Keynes was a libertine hedonist who wasted most of his adult life engaging in sexual relationships with children, including travelling around the Mediterranean visiting children’s brothels. Funnily wicked too.
    ellauri080.html on line 542: This axis is also apparent in my own videos: you’ll notice there are quite a few of them, partly because I keep on redoing the same topics whenever I feel I’ve hit on a new perspective that I then can’t help but explain as though it were my new ‘doctrine’ because it suddenly seems so much more clear and beautiful and compelling than any previous perspectives, and I just want to get that pure idea out. Literally, after I do a video on a compelling subject, if I did it well, I’ll feel like I’ve emptied myself out, and I’ll very easily forget what it was that I just explained in that video. The idea dulls, I start finding some problems with it, and over time I mull it around with other material and then become bedazzled by the next rich synthesis.
    ellauri080.html on line 605: The shipwrecked castaways desperately want to leave the remote island, and various opportunities frequently present themselves, but always fail, usually due to some bumbling error committed by Gilligan. Sometimes this would result in Gilligan saving the others from some unforeseen flaw in their plan.
    ellauri080.html on line 609: Life on the island. A running gag is the castaways' ability to fashion a vast array of useful objects from bamboo, gourds, vines and other local materials. Some are simple everyday things, such as eating and cooking utensils, while others (such as a remarkably efficient lie detector apparatus) are stretches of the imagination. Russell Johnson noted in his autobiography that the production crew enjoyed the challenge of building these props. These bamboo items include framed huts with thatched grass sides and roofs, along with bamboo closets strong enough to withstand hurricane-force winds and rain, the communal dining table and chairs, pipes for Gilligan's hot water, a stethoscope, and a pedal-powered car.
    ellauri080.html on line 619: Most of the slapstick comedic sequences between Gilligan and Grumby were heavily inspired by Laurel and Hardy, particularly by Grumby breaking the fourth wall by looking directly into the camera expressing his frustration with Gilligan's clumsiness as Oliver Hardy often did.
    ellauri080.html on line 696: “It could be that people with just a few autistic traits have an increased risk of substance-abuse problems, while those with more traits are somehow protected,” Agrawal concluded. “For this study, we clumped all of these symptoms together. In future research, we want to look at how individual traits-like repetitive behaviors or being withdrawn socially-may influence risk. It could be that some traits related to autism are protective, while others elevate the risk for alcohol and substance-abuse problems.”
    ellauri080.html on line 713: Rogers had a difficult childhood. He was shy, introverted, and overweight, and was frequently homebound after suffering bouts of asthma. He was bullied and taunted as a child for his weight, and called "Fat Freddy".
    ellauri080.html on line 716: Rogers died of stomach cancer on February 27, 2003 at age 74. Rogers was red-green color-blind. He became a pescatarian in 1970, after the death of his father, and a vegetarian in the early 1980s, saying he "couldn't eat anything that had a mother". Rogers was a registered Republican, and a confirmed presbyterian. Despite his strong faith, Rogers struggled with anger, conflict, and self-doubt, especially at the end of his life. Despite Rogers' family's wealth, he cared little about making money, and lived frugally, especially as he and his wife grew older.
    ellauri080.html on line 717: Rogers swam daily at the Pittsburgh Athletic Association, after waking every morning between 4:30 and 5:30 A.M. to pray and to "read the Bible and prepare himself for the day". He did not smoke or drink. He was a skinny shrimp who weighed 143lb (65kg) most of his adult life.
    ellauri080.html on line 727: In 1930, he was the Time Magazine, Person of the year. His birth name was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. “Mahatma” was an epithet meaning ‘great-souled one’ that was added to his name. He was first called ‘Mahatma’ by Rabindranath Tagore in 1915. Gandhi married aged 13 to Masturbai aged 14. Child marriage was common at the time, but Gandhi later came to oppose child marriage. Anyway to Masturbai. They had five children, one dying in infancy.
    ellauri080.html on line 729: At school, his academic results were described as mediocre. One report concluded that Gandhi was “good at English, fair in Arithmetic and weak in Geography; conduct very good, bad handwriting.” His first English teacher was an Irishman, and so Gandhi spoke English with an Irish accent.
    ellauri080.html on line 730: As a teenager, he rebelled against the strict orthodox teachings of no alcohol, meat or womanising. After trying out all of them he made a vow to live a virtuous life. Aged 18 he travelled to England to train to be a barrister, and was made to swear a vow, by his orthodox Hindu family, he would not touch wine, women or meat. He was almost able to keep his vow.
    ellauri080.html on line 733: In India, a Muslim friend encouraged Gandhi to eat goat’s meat. As Gandhi was physically weak, he agreed to it. But, that night he had a dream that the goat was crying inside his stomach. He said “I can’t eat meat anymore. I heard the goat's mother bleat from inside me.” He never ate meat again.
    ellauri080.html on line 734: Gandhi later made a vow to not take milk products, but ill-health again forced him to change his mind and he took goats-milk.
    ellauri080.html on line 735: In his adult life, Gandhi never drank alcohol and claimed that alcohol was ‘one of the most greatly-felt evils of the British Rule.’ Ill-health may have forced him to take a cup or two now and then.
    ellauri080.html on line 738: In South Africa, Gandhi became aware of the strong racism in South African society. He was stripped and thrown off a train in Pietermaritzburg and left shivering at the train station. This was a turning point in his life as it made him more aware of his political colour.
    ellauri080.html on line 742: In 1899, at the outbreak of the Boer War, he formed an Indian ambulance service encouraging his fellow Indians to serve the British – despite the prejudice they were facing.
    ellauri080.html on line 744: For his service in the Boer War, Gandhi was awarded the Queen’s South Africa Medal. What the fuck was he doing fighting a colonial war for the British? On the other hand, Boers were no better than Brits in that respect. They took turns on sitting on the natives, with the Indian middle class sitting in the middle.
    ellauri080.html on line 748: Gandhi was never a man to hold a grudge. While in jail in South Africa he prepared a pair of sandals for Jan Smut to prove there was no ill-feeling. Smuts, in turn, gave a boot to his political adversary, Gandhi.
    ellauri080.html on line 754: Gandhi’s most famous campaign was the Salt march of 1930. Gandhi walked to the ocean to make his own salt – thereby non-violently oppose the British law which forbade the Indians from making their own salt. Gandhi used to drink his own pee in the mornings to retain the salt.
    ellauri080.html on line 755: “With this I’m shaking the foundations of the British Empire.” – Gandhi – after holding up a cup of pee.
    ellauri080.html on line 761: “There is more to life than increasing its speed.” After returning from Africa to India. Gandhi opened an ashram, which was supported by rich businessmen. However, when Gandhi allowed an untouchable into his ashram, the businessmen, who were orthodox Hindus, stopped giving money – causing the ashram financial difficulties. However, one businessman started giving money to Gandhi on the condition of anonymity.
    ellauri080.html on line 770: Rabindranath Tagore, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature, was a great admirer of Gandhi, it was often Tagore alone who could persuade Gandhi to give up his fasts unto death.
    ellauri080.html on line 776: It was said Gandhi unlike George Washington could not tell a lie. In 1906, aged 38 Gandhi took a vow of brahmacharya (celibacy) and struggled throughout his life to be celibate in both actions and thought.
    ellauri080.html on line 779: Gandhi despised his own sexual desires, and despised sex in any context except for procreation. He preached that the failure to control carnal urges led to complaints including constipation. He believed that sex was bad for the health of an individual, and that sexual freedom would lead Indians to failure as a people. He sought to consign his nation to what Martin Luther called "the hell of celibacy". He took his own celibacy vow unilaterally, without consulting his wife.
    ellauri080.html on line 783: During Gandhi's time as a dissident in South Africa, he discovered a male youth had been harassing two of his female followers. Gandhi responded by personally cutting the girls' hair off, to ensure the "sinner's eye" was "sterilised". Gandhi boasted of the incident in his writings, pushing the message to all Indians that women should carry responsibility for sexual attacks upon them. Such a legacy still lingers. In the summer of 2009, colleges in north India reacted to a spate of sexual harassment cases by banning women from wearing jeans, as western-style dress was too "provocative" for the males on campus.
    ellauri080.html on line 785: Gandhi believed Indian women who were raped lost their value as human beings. He argued that fathers could be justified in killing daughters who had been sexually assaulted for the sake of family and community honour. He moderated his views towards the end of his life. But the damage was done, and the legacy lingers in every present-day Indian press report of a rape victim who commits suicide out of "shame". Gandhi also waged a war against contraceptives, labelling Indian women who used them as whores.
    ellauri080.html on line 787: Like all men who wage a doomed war with their own sexual desires, Gandhi's behaviour around females would eventually become very, very odd. He took to sleeping with naked young women, including his own great-niece, in order to "test" his commitment to celibacy. The habit caused shock and outrage among his supporters. God knows how his wife felt.
    ellauri080.html on line 791: In the words of the Indian writer Khushwant Singh, "nine-tenths of the violence and unhappiness in this country derives from sexual repression". Gandhi isn't singularly to blame for India's deeply problematic attitudes to sex and female sexuality. But he fought, and succeeded, to ensure the country would never experience sexual freedom while his legend persevered. Gandhi's genius was to realise the great power of non-violent political revolution. But the violence of his thoughts towards women has contributed to countless honour killings and immeasurable suffering.
    ellauri080.html on line 793: Gandhi placed great value on self-sufficiency. As a lawyer he learnt to wash his own clothes, and later he also learnt to cut his own hair. Even though he was initially ridiculed for his messy hairstyle. Okay he said and shaved his head. Made him look the jailbird he was.
    ellauri080.html on line 796: “We shall feel happy and free like a bird even behind the prison walls. We shall never weary of jail-going. When the whole of India has learned this lesson, India shall be free. For, if the alien power turns the whole of India into a vast prison, it will not be able to imprison her soul.” – Gandhi
    ellauri080.html on line 798: Gandhi was brought up a Hindu, in the Vaishnava tradition. This is a sect that worships the Hindu god Vishnu.
    ellauri080.html on line 801: During his life, Gandhi studied all the major religions – the Bible, The Qu’ran, The Buddhist scriptures and of course the major Indian classics, such as the Bhagavad Gita. In London he also studied Theosophy.
    ellauri080.html on line 805: Gandhi was also inspired by Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” John Ruskin (for his critique of capitalism) and Leo Tolstoy and his philosophy of non-violence.
    ellauri080.html on line 811: George Orwell, in his 1949 essay Reflections on Gandhi, said that "saints should always be judged guilty until they are proved innocent". Remember, there's no such thing as a saint. But there are heaps of shrimps. Used to be, anyway.
    ellauri080.html on line 817: Eu-nukki: Mä en halua tietää Gandhista mitään.
    ellauri080.html on line 832: Meidän amerikkalaisten onni oli kun joku joskus Amerikan historiassa ymmärsi, että kun jokainen amerikkalainen tavoittelee omaa henkilökohtaista hyväänsä, niin lopputulos on kaikille mahdollisimman hyvä. Tämän me opimme peruskoulussa jo lapsina.
    ellauri080.html on line 850: Vipassanā (Pāli) or vipaśyanā (Sanskrit) literally "hyper, super (vi), seeing (passanā)", is a Buddhist term that is often translated as "insight". The Pali Canon describes it as one of two qualities of mind which is developed (bhāvanā) in Buddhist meditation, the other being samatha (mind calming). It is often defined as a form of meditation that seeks "insight into the true nature of reality", defined as anicca "impermanence", dukkha "suffering, unsatisfactoriness", anattā "non-self", the three marks of existence in the Theravada tradition, and as śūnyatā "emptiness" and Buddha-nature in the Mahayana traditions.
    ellauri080.html on line 1048: US Olympiatiimin äskettäinen kämmi voittaa mitalia Sochissa valottaa järjestöllistä epäonnistumista joka ois voitu välttää paremmalla OB:n käytöllä. (Ei, eise ole tamponi, vaan lyhenne sanoista Järjestöllinen Käyttäytyminen.) Tämä artikkeli pyörittelee kämmiä ja syyttäää siitä melkein yxinomaan pääsohvaa Dan Bylsimää. Atikkeli pointtaa ulos monta johtajuuden, päätöxenteon, ja pyrkyryyden kämmiä. (Unohtamatta että koko joukkueessa ei ollut yhtään naishenkilöä, terveys- ja siivoushenkilökuntaa lukuunottamatta.)
    ellauri080.html on line 1054: Artikkeli osoittaa myös pari Bylsimän päätöxentekokämmiä. Aikaisin pronssiottelussa Suomen kanssa (jonka Suomi siis voitti, hyvä Suomi! Kuinka noloa, U.S. joukkue lähti jäältä ihan häntä koipien välissä), Bylsimä valizi epähuomiossa Suomen joukkueen Saku Koivun lämäämään rangaistuslätkäyxen, joka olisi lisännyt paljon pelin liikevoimaa jos se olis tehnyt oman maalin. Ei vaitiskaan, se valizi Patrick Kanen joka oli ihan hasbeen tämmöisissä lätkäyxissä. Se ois voinut valita tämän artikkelin kirjoittajan langon Zach Parisen, tiimikapteenin jolla on takanaan pelkkiä menestyxiä. Bylsmää hämäsi ilmeisesti saatavuusheuristiikka (? eli Kane oli siinä lähinnä, tai se oli ainoa jonka nimen se sattui muistamaan). Sitä vaivas myös selektiivinen kylmyys: sillä ei ollut tilastoja sylissä, eikä se koskaan oikein ollut tykännyt röyhkeästä Zachista, eikä sen pahasuisesta langosta. Jos Bylsimä olis ollut rationaalinen eikä noin helkkarin dundeellinen, se olisi voinut erittelevästi valita joukkueen parhaan "ampujan". Se ei siis ollut tarpeexi laskelmoiva. Sen lisäxi, toisin kuin menestyneempi Kanadan sohva, se ei koskaan muuttanut joukkueen viivoja tai pelitapoja. Röyhkeä Zach mainizikin tän syyxi tiimin tappioihin, varmaan pahasuisen langon neuvosta. Bylsimä oli siis liian laskelmoiva. Bylsimä lankesi myös pariin vanhanaikaiseen päätöxentekovinoumaan, ihan alkeisjuttuja. Se oli menestynyt heikompia vastustajia vastaan ja oli kuin ylpistynyt sirkka, luuli izestään ihan liikoja. Siitä se otti konfirmaatiovinoumaa loppupeleissä. Se ei tajunnut mikä nytte meni pieleen, jos se olis sen tajunnut, lopputulos oisi voinut olla toinen. Jos ne ei ois hävinneet Suomi-ottelua, ne olis voineet voittaa ehkä pronssin. Mutta Bylsimä ei ottanut opixeen, ei nöyristynyt Zachille ja sen langolle ja kazo miten kävi. Olis pitänyt noudattaa parempaa strategiaa, mennä ize mailan kanssa jäälle pelaamaan ja taklaamaan Saku Koivua. Zachista ja Kanesta ei ollut mihinkään.
    ellauri080.html on line 1056: Kaikista Bylsimän kämmeistä huolimatta täytyy vähän haukuskella myös pelaajia. Kuten sanottua Zach oli aivan paska, ei saanut mitään aikaan kentällä ja oli täys märkä pyyhe pukuhuoneessa. Ei siitä ollut minkään maakunnan palvelujohtajaxi. Tiimipotenssi oli ihan hakusessa, hännät roikkuivat syndeistä jalkovälissä kuin aukipäässeet luikannauhat. Tiimi lähti Sochista äärimmäisen pettyneinä tuloxeen. Taas kerran saatiin turpaan mailta joista niin toivorikkaina joskus lähdettiin kultaa vuolemaan. Kulta meni Kanadaan ja muut metallit jäi vanhaan Eurooppaan. Oh fuck it all.
    ellauri082.html on line 58: Wallace described himself as “near great” at his favorite sport, but in reality he was just the 11th-best teenage player in central Illinois – not exactly a tennis hotbed. Still, he was good enough to beat Jay McInerney when they were both at the artist colony Yaddo.
    ellauri082.html on line 62: Obsessed with the writer Mary Karr, Wallace planned to shoot her husband with a gun he tried to buy from a guy he met in recovery. She found out about the scheme, but believed him when he blamed it on his buddy. Wallace and Karr eventually became a couple, but Wallace stalked her kid in an ugly manner after she chucked him.
    ellauri082.html on line 66: And supported Ross Perot! But his loathing of George W. Bush turned Wallace into a some kinda liberal. Woodrow Wilson kind, I guess.
    ellauri082.html on line 70: Wallace was so embarrassed by his tendency to sweat that he carried a tennis racket in high school, hoping people would think he had just left the court. He was also serious about dental hygiene, keeping a toothbrush in his sock for emergencies.
    ellauri082.html on line 72:
    One of his best short stories is about Elizabeth Wurtzel.

    ellauri082.html on line 78: Wallace hooked up with everyone from friends’ girlfriends to countless young fans. He once asked his friend Jonathan Franzen if his only purpose on Earth is “to put my penis in as many vaginas as possible.” Just like Georges Simenon.
    ellauri082.html on line 91: 99% of compulsive thinkers’ thinking is about themselves; that 99% of this self-directed thinking consists of imagining and then getting ready for things that are going to happen to them; and then, weirdly, that if they stop to think about it, that 100% of the things they spend 99% of their time and energy imagining and trying to prepare for all the contingencies and consequences of are never good. In short that 99% of the head’s thinking activity consists of trying to scare the everliving shit out of itself.
    ellauri082.html on line 101: The biography by Tyrannosaurus Max paints a less than flattering portrait of Wallace. That’s not to say it’s a vicious takedown—it’s probably about as even-handed as a biography about the author is going to be, and I can imagine books about him in the future being a lot less level-headed in either direction. Basically, DFW was an extremely troubled individual and probably not a very awesome person qua person. He was often misanthropic, violent, cruel (especially to women), and self-absorbed. But what’s great about the biography is how it allows these rather hideous characteristics to disgust as well as inform; knowing the uglier aspects of DFW’s personality is extremely enlightening with regard to his work. It seems to me that the writer was extremely aware of his immense character flaws and sought in his work (his novels and his non-fiction particularly) to overcome them, and in his work he was able to occupy a wholly different realm than he was in his actual life. Well actually not at all that different. The books project a rather nasty person too.
    ellauri082.html on line 103: More than anything the biography is a testament to something even DFW himself would have said: do not build monuments to individuals. His genius is in his work, and in his case his work was both in writing and in acting; the DFW one sees and hears in interviews is DFW as spinner of fiction, not DFW as himself. One need not pretend David Foster Wallace was a god of sincerity and morality and self-awareness; his work clearly shows he was not.
    ellauri082.html on line 105: Despite his flaws, DFW’s death is still a great tragedy, not because people are without their god of post-post-post-postmodernism, but because his redemptive and humanistic work is now decidedly finite. Well here sure was a humanist as far as technology is concerned. His work could have beeen made infinite by adding to the end: Poles are stupid, please turn over.
    ellauri082.html on line 118: WARNING: This whole thing is one gigantic spoiler. Only read it if you’ve already tried to figure it out for yourself first.
    ellauri082.html on line 122: Gately, having relieved his bottom, begins to recover from his infection.
    ellauri082.html on line 123: But at the same time, Hal’s condition deepens. Ever since Hal ate the mold as a child, he’s been a brilliant communicator but unable to feel. (694: “Hal himself hasn’t had a bona fide intensity-of-interior-life-type emotion since he was tiny … in fact he’s far more robotic than John Wayne.”) JOI was the only one who could see it. In life, everyone thought JOI was just being crazy but in death (as a wraith) he can actually read Hal’s thoughts and thus confirm his view.
    ellauri082.html on line 129: Described as coming from a kind of mold that “grows on other molds,” DMZ is an incredibly powerful and mysterious hallucinogen. It can have many different effects but often seems to transform a person’s ability to communicate. It is also nicknamed “Madame Psychosis,” after Joelle’s radio persona. Michael Pemulis manages to acquire some, but it is stolen before he and Hal can take it. It’s suggested that Hal has been affected by DMZ by the time of the Year of Glad, but it’s unclear how—whether from eating a piece of mold as a child and then withdrawing from marijuana, or having his toothbrush laced with Pemulis’s drugs (possibly by James’s wraith). As a result of this presumed DMZ consumption, Hal is able to feel strong emotions (which was impossible for him before) but unable to communicate.
    ellauri082.html on line 131: JOI also created DMZ as part of an attempt to undo the effects of Hal’s eating mold as a child (recall: DMZ is a mold that grows on a mold). He left it along with the Entertainment (recall: ETA kids find JOI’s personal effects (670: “a bulky old doorless microwave…a load of old TP cartridges…mostly unlabelled”); the tapes and the DMZ are delivered together to the FLQ) which is about this goal (it stars a woman named Madame Psychosis (a street name for DMZ; another is 1st Av.) explaining that the thing that killed you in your last life will give birth to you in the next). The DMZ and the Entertainment were meant to go together for Hal. Now that the Entertainment has escaped, he needs to get Hal the DMZ.
    ellauri082.html on line 133: Hal never leaves leaves his toothbrush unattended (870), but that’s no problem for a wraith. He places the DMZ on Hal’s brush and Hal brushes his teeth (860) and immediately begins experiencing symptoms: Ortho thinks Hal’s crying when Hal thinks he’s speaking in a neutral tone (862).
    ellauri082.html on line 135: Hal’s symptoms indeed begin to reverse: he is now unable to properly communicate feelings (people see him as either laughing hysterically or terribly sad) but beginning to actually feel (like Gately, he spends a lot of time lying on the floor thinking about the past — the hero of nonaction from his essay (142)). While before, everyone could hear him except JOI; now only JOI can hear him (since, as with Gately, he can hear Hal’s thoughts).
    ellauri082.html on line 137: By the time of the match, his symptoms are so bad he’s taken by ambulance to the hospital (16: “the only other emergency room I have ever been in [was] almost exactly one year back”), safely escaping the A.F.R.’s assault. Like fellow student Otis P. Lord, he gets the bed next to Gately. Joelle (who is at the hospital for a meeting) visits Gately on her way out and recognizes Hal. She tells them both about the hunt for the lethal Entertainment and the resulting Continental Emergency and they all go to dig up JOI’s grave. They persuade John Wayne, a spy for the A.F.R., to become a double agent and help sneak them into JOI’s Quebec burial site. Wayne presumably tells the A.F.R. he is actually a triple agent — that he will steal the tape as soon as Hal digs it up. But, as with Marathe, his loyalties are ultimately even-numbered (n40). The A.F.R. finds out and brutally murders him, which is why he can’t win the WhataBurger (16f).
    ellauri082.html on line 141: he’s with a very sad kid and they’re in a graveyard digging some dead guy’s head up and it’s really important, like Continental-Emergency important, and Gately’s the best digger but he’s wicked hungry, like irresistibly hungry, and he’s eating with both hands out of huge economy-size bags of corporate snacks so he can’t really dig, while it gets later and later and the sad kid is trying to scream at Gately that the important thing was buried in the guy’s head and to divert the Continental Emergency to start digging the guy’s head up before it’s too late, but the kid moves his mouth but nothing comes out, and Joelle van D. appears … while the sad kid holds something terrible up by the hair and makes the face of somebody shouting in panic: Too Late. (934)
    ellauri082.html on line 145: Orin (who never attended his father’s funeral) went to the gravesite and dug up his father, releasing the wraith in the process. (244: “After a burial, rural Papineau-region Québecers purportedly drill a small hole down from ground level all the way down through the lid of the coffin, to let out the soul, if it wants out.”) Orin, who is such a partisan of his father that he feels the need to repeatedly ruin the lives of people like his mother, has been mailing the tapes to his father’s enemies in revenge: disapproving film critics in Berkeley and the medical attaché (whose affair with his mother drove Himself especially wild) in Boston. It’s possible he’s being influenced by the wraith in these actions.
    ellauri082.html on line 147: After the A.F.R. releases roaches into his giant glass tumbler, Orin cuts a deal with the A.F.R. and gives them the tape in return for letting him live. (He’s apparently still alive on p. 14.) The A.F.R. uses the tape to set off some sort of intracontinental conflagaration (16: “some sort of ultra-mach fighter too high overhead to hear slices the sky from south to north”) which apparently topples the Gentle administration (n114: “[Y.G. is] the very last year of Subsidized Time”).
    ellauri082.html on line 149: As seen in Chapter 1, Hal’s condition deepens until he literally can’t communicate at all, but no longer feels like a robot anymore. (12: “I’m not a machine. I feel and believe.”) The only thing he has left is tennis and he looks forward to playing Ortho Stice in the final match of the WhataBurger. But Stice is possessed by his father (in the manuscript, Stice is called “the Wraithster”), so the novel ends as Hal finally gets to really interface with his father — in the only way he has left.
    ellauri082.html on line 159: Accusations that DFW is “talking down to” or “intentionally alienating” with his vocabulary I can understand somewhat–I don’t believe he was actually intending to make people feel stupid, but he’s clearly excessive and self-indulgent on occasion.
    ellauri082.html on line 163: In Brittany, it was said that when the Ankou (Death) when he came to get you, you heard the squeak of his chariot’s wheels. Faisait-elle? disent les Fauteils rollants sans pieds avec le squeak.
    ellauri082.html on line 176: Tero lukee paitsi työnsä puolesta myös vapaa-ajallaan ja mieluiten tietokirjallisuutta: historiaa, elämäkertoja ja maallikoille suunnattuja tiedekirjoja esimerkiksi fysiikasta. – Aikaisemmin luin paljon kaunokirjallisuutta, mutta nyt kiinnostaa tietokirjallisuus. Haluan oppia enemmän maailmasta. Hän luonnehtii itseään paneutuvaksi lukijaksi. – Jos innostun jostakin kirjasta, perehdyn yleensä tekijän koko tuotantoon.
    ellauri082.html on line 197: Helmi pelasi pienenä Walt Disneyn peliä Ötökän elämää. Sen alussa oli muurahainen joka ketkui oudosti ja vinkkasi perheen pienimpiä mukaan Disneyn "Viihteeseen". Siitä tuli mieleen Whiten kirjan The Once and Future King murkkupesäepisodi, joka kauhisti ja nauratti armeijassa ollessa. Siinä sain taas vahvistusrokotuxen kaikenlaista tiimitouhuilua vastaan.
    ellauri082.html on line 208: Ötökän elämä sai yleensä sekalaiset tai huonot arvostelut. Disney oli kiinnostuneempi $40 maxavasta mainoxesta leffalle kuin pelinteosta. "Cheery, happy tunes and strong sound effects. Any way you slice it, this stinks." Kuin marjalude.
    ellauri082.html on line 232: To watch his woods fill up with snow. kazomaan kun mezä täyttyy lumesta.
    ellauri082.html on line 239: He gives his harness bells a shake Se ravistelee valjaskelloja
    ellauri082.html on line 272: Frost was 38, pushing forty. Frost wrote the poem in June 1922 at his house in Shaftsbury, Vermont. He had been up the entire night writing the long poem "New Hampshire" and had finally finished when he realized morning had come. He went out to view the sunrise and suddenly got the idea for "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening".[2] He wrote the new poem "about the snowy evening and the little horse as if I'd had a hallucination" in just "a few minutes without strain."
    ellauri082.html on line 284: Robert Frost is by no means the only poet in whom a hunger for recognition comes into conflict with a wariness, an inner reticence, a distaste for self-revelation. But I think in him the conflict was particularly acute. On the one hand he could be quite shameless in his pursuit of favourable reviews and his presentation to the public of a folksy and largely misleading image. On the other hand we have cryptic comments like in this poem it is not made explicit what the ‘things forbidden’ are that he has managed to preserve for himself but I take them to be his poems, or those things that his poems keep alive, and he is rightly confident enough in his own powers as a poet to feel that he has succeeded.
    ellauri082.html on line 288: Em's poem was published posthumously in 1890 in Poems: Series 1, a collection of Dickinson's poems assembled and edited by her friends. Critics attribute the lack of fear in her tone as her acceptance of death as "a natural part of the endless cycle of nature," due to the certainty in her belief in Christ. (Silly, if death is a natural part of the endless cycle of nature who needs Christ meddling into it? Christ was no endless cycle guy but like Tom Hanks in "News of the world" a guy who points with his hand straight ahead, in a rigidly raising logistic line toward the abyss.)
    ellauri082.html on line 312: I’ve chosen to blog this particular passage, which runs ten pages in lenght, for a few reasons, the most honest reason being its unrelenting frankly honest potrayal of a person in the midst of a serious marijuana dependancy. Erdedy’s chapter has him eagerly awaiting the delivery of 200 grams of high-resin weed, of which he will force himself to smoke in its entirety in one hazy fog-induced sitting. Wallace, writing in the 3rd person, manages to get close enough to Erdedy’s running internal monologue to present to us a deeply troubled young man’s addiction and the lenghts he is willing to go to–whislt also attempting to redeem himself through his numerous attempts in kicking the addiction–in order to satisfy his intense cravings.
    ellauri082.html on line 314: Wallace’s tight prose and his very precise use of the drug-users thought process, such as planning to smoke in large quantities to induce a horrible high in order to create an intense aversion to smoking or mulling over the decision to call a dealer for an update for their ETA, creates an incruciating relatable charatcer in Erdedy. Anyone who has struggled with slowing down or completely stopping a vice that has consumed their daily life may find this passage incredibly relatable.
    ellauri082.html on line 328: Me ostettiin mustaa afgaa ja punaista libaa perunatorilta. Muistan että menin sinne kerran ostamaan, mutta en muista uskalsinko pyytää oikeesti. Jönsyltä sitä sai ja kavereilta. Jotkut teki hashishbrownieita, kai mä niitäkin söin MIT:n aikoina. Viimexi taisin maistaa maria Floridassa Mike Handin piipusta. Ei siitä koskaan mitään riippuvuutta tullut, eikä tupakastakaan.
    ellauri082.html on line 354: Also lässt sich Troeltschs Aufsatz globalgeschichtlich in die Reihe von Reaktionen einordnen, mit denen Vertreter der Weltreligionen Buddhismus, (protestantisches) Christentum, Hinduismus und Islam ab Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts auf die Herausforderungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Materialismus und der allgemeinen Religionsgeschichte antworten, zumeist indem Religion allgemein über Kriterien der Innerlichkeit und Universalität definiert und die eigene Tradition im Gegenüber zu anderen als vollständige Erfüllung dieser Kriterien dargestellt wird.
    ellauri082.html on line 368: Näin unta että Fix und Foxin piirtäjä Rudolf Kauka (jonka nimi unessa oli jostain syystä Fink) oli nuorena Rikhard Fick nimisenä perustanut autokorjaamon kuplafolkkariin. Asensi sinne kaikki laitteet ja alkoi eziä asiakkaita. Sitten ihan zägällä se pääsi jonkun porhon autolaivueen omamekaanikoxi ja rikastui ja kuten sanotaan loppu oli historiaa. Missä vaiheessa se alkoi piirtää susi Lupoa ja niitä nenäkkäitä pikkukettuja ei selvinnyt koska heräsin.
    ellauri082.html on line 498: The reader who found himself swamped with too much metaphysics in the last chapter will have a still worse time of it in this one, which is exclusively metaphysical. Metaphysics means nothing but an unusually obstinate effort to avoid thinking clearly.
    ellauri082.html on line 502: This mind as society hypothesis has outward advantages which make it almost irresistibly attractive to the intellect, and yet it is inwardly quite unintelligible. Of its unintelligibility, however, half the writers on psychology seem unaware.
    ellauri082.html on line 507: "A motion became a feeling!—no phrase that our lips can frame is so devoid of apprehensible meaning." (Says Spencer - check out this guy.) And some Tyndall guy that everyone knew by heart in late 19th: "the passage from the physics of the brain to the corresponding facts of consciousness is unthinkable." (Nothing to it except fear of death and retribution. Funny but seriously I have never seen anything the matter with it. Your mind is like a little video camera connected to a bunch of neural networks that mill the images around. Whats wrong with this concept is hard for me to see.)
    ellauri082.html on line 509: John Tyndall FRS (/ˈtɪndəl/; 2 August 1820 – 4 December 1893) was an Irish physicist. He first noticed the greenhouse effect but went on mountaineering happily in the melting glaciers. He was a member of a club that vocally supported Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and sought to strengthen the barrier, or separation, between religion and science. The most prominent member of this club was the anatomist Thomas Henry Huxley. Others included the social philosopher Herbert Spencer.
    ellauri082.html on line 511: James lifts his blue jeans and says that for "continuity of evolution" if there is consciousness now somebody (guess who) must have been conscious all along. If we have pricks and cunts now somebody must have sported them from the dawn of time. Well at least Jamesey must then allow for our "fellow animals" some rudiments of soul, that's a big concession.
    ellauri082.html on line 740: Ensinäkin se varmentaa wanhan tutun totuuden siitä, että naiset suosivat narsisteja miehiä. Se samalla todistaa sitä hypoteesia, jonka mukaan naiset pitävät näistä jännämiehistä, koska nainen on ize luontaisesti samalla luonnolla varustettu, ja nämä miehet täten hänen hengenheimolaisiaan.
    ellauri082.html on line 757: They found that Victim Signaling scores highly correlated with dark triad scores (r = .35). This association held after controlling for gender, ethnicity, income, and other factors that might make people vulnerable to mistreatment.
    ellauri082.html on line 762: They replicated this association in a follow-up study. This time they used a different, more robust, dark triad scale. They then found a stronger correlation between the dark triad traits and victim signaling (r = .52).
    ellauri082.html on line 763: The researchers also found that victim signaling negatively correlated (r = -.38) with Honesty-Humility. This is a personality measure of sincerity, fairness, greed avoidance, and modesty. This suggests that victim signalers may be greedier and less honest than those who do not signal victimhood.
    ellauri082.html on line 767: Victim signalers were more likely to cheat in this game. The researchers again found that these results held after controlling for ethnicity, gender, income, and other factors.
    ellauri082.html on line 793: And this is good old Boston,
    ellauri082.html on line 800: In downtown Boston you may see trash cans, cones, or other objects being used to save parking spots in residential areas throughout the winter. No one wants to shovel their spot to find it taken by the time they return! This is common practice, and completely legal.
    ellauri083.html on line 75: Taalojen vastoinkäymiset huipentuivat 1927 "Nankingin selkkauxeen". Useita länkkäreitä tapettiin Tshiang Kai-Shekin kansalliskaartin ja kommareiden ja kaikenlaisten sotaherrojen välisissä kärhämissä. Isäpappa Absalom vaati taas jäädä paikoilleen kuten boxereiden aikana. Köyhä kiinalaisperhe kuzui ne piileskelemään majaansa. Kotitalo puzattiin putipuhtaaxi. Perhe piileskeli kauhuissaan kokonaisen päivän ennenkuin jenkkien tykkiveneet pelasti ne. Ne matkusti Shanghaihin ja sitten purjehti (siis meni laivalla) Jaappaniin, missä ne oli vuoden, minkä jälkeen ne palasi Nankingiin. Helmin kuuleman mukaan Japanissa oli muitakin kuin militaristeja. Kun se palasi Japanista 1927, se alkoi kirjottaa kynä sauhuten. Se oli hyvissä väleissä kiinalaisten taantumuskirjailijoiden kaa kuten Xu Zhimo and kirjoituskoneen kexijäpelle Lin Yutang. Ne rohkaisi sitä kirjoittamaan rahasta. Se halusi toteuttaa kunnianhimon jonka äiti oli kieltänyt, ja tarvizihan se rahaa jos se jättäisi sen luuserin, jonka lähetyssaarnaaja-asennosta oli koko ajan vähemmän iloa. Carolkin tarvizi ammattiapua. Helmi lähti Statesiin taas 1929 missä Richard J. Walsh bylsi sitä ja julkaisi Helmin kirjan Itä Tuuli: Länsi Tuuli. Walshista tuli myöhemmin siippa ja kiltti apuri Helmille. Nankingiin palattua Helmi pysytteli ullakolla ja kirjoitti Hyvää Puuta.
    ellauri083.html on line 84: We can now add yet another to that list. This week, her estate announced the discovery of a new never-published manuscript called "The Eternal Wonder." And as her son Edgar Walsh tells it, the story of the novel's recovery is a wonder itself.
    ellauri083.html on line 88: LYDEN: "The Eternal Wonder" will be published this fall. Edgar Walsh, who manages his mother's literary estate, says he had a complex reaction to the news.
    ellauri083.html on line 90: WALSH: I had not known that my mother had written this in the last year or two of her life. And I certainly did not know that someone had spirited the manuscript out of a home in which she lived her last years in Vermont and had concealed it from me and the family for 40 years.
    ellauri083.html on line 92: I was notified in December of last year that a woman in Texas who has a business buying storage units that have not paid their rent and she had purchased a unit in Fort Worth and discovered this manuscript, which was in a holographic form as a written manuscript, of course. And the woman in Texas wanted to sell it.
    ellauri083.html on line 96: WALSH: To whomever. Initially, she wanted to put the manuscript on eBay and try to sell it there. I contacted an attorney in Philadelphia, Peter Hearn, and said we will not give her what she's asking for, but we will pay her a modest sum of money, and we wanted it returned immediately. That worked. I read the manuscript, and I said, you know, I want to get this published.
    ellauri083.html on line 100: WALSH: It was fascinating, frankly, to read her final novel and to realize that it was, in a sense, an historic event. But reading this book just took me back to my many discussions with her about her work. And I just had a sense of awe that a woman, who, when she wrote this, was 78, 79 years old. And she knew she was dying. She was ill with cancer and she knew that she would be ending her life soon. But she sat down and, with a pen, wrote out over 300 pages.
    ellauri083.html on line 114: LYDEN: I should think. Tell us a little bit about the story of this novel. What's it about?
    ellauri083.html on line 116: WALSH: The novel follows the life of a brilliant young man, a genius, from his birth to his military career to a love affair with an older woman in London to Paris, where he meets a Chinese girl. And it is a very personal, fictional explanation of themes, of toleration and humanity that informed Pearl's work.
    ellauri083.html on line 131: Very different from his novel Hunger, here Hamsun has written a sweeping story of one man's accomplishments as a homesteader in northern Norway near the border with Sweden. Isak, a young and very strong man, with no fear of work, goes looking for a good place to settle. He walks and walks, looking for a place that has everything he needs: water, haying grounds, pasture, areas to farm, timber. When he finally finds it, he settles in. There is a coastal town a full day's walk away (20 miles? 10 miles?). He puts out word that he needs a woman's help--and lo and behold, Inger comes. She too has no fear of work, and she has a harelip--teased for much of her life, she finds a good man in Isak. They work, they have several children, Inger is imprisoned for 6 years. Others come and settle the area between their farm Sellanra and the town. A fascinating story of rural northern Norway in the 2nd half of the 19th century.
    ellauri083.html on line 135: The Good Earth (English The Good Earth) is a historical fiction novel by American author Pearl S. Buck published in 1931 that dramatizes family life in a Chinese village in the early 20th century. It was influential in Buck's winning the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1938.
    ellauri083.html on line 137: The story begins on Wang Lung's wedding day and follows the rise and fall of his fortunes. The House of Hwang, a family of wealthy landowners, lives in the nearby town, where Wang Lung's future wife, O-Lan, lives as a slave. However, the House of Hwang slowly declines due to opium use, frequent spending, uncontrolled borrowing and a general unwillingness to work. He was willing to take any woman who knew how to work, except a harelip (which is just what Inger was). He was disappointed when O-Lan had big and ugly feet. These boots are made for walking...
    ellauri083.html on line 141: During the devastating famine and drought, the family must flee to a large city in the south to find work. Wang Lung's malevolent uncle offers to buy his possessions and land, but for significantly less than their value. The family sells everything except the land and the house. Wang Lung then faces the long journey south, contemplating how the family will survive walking, when he discovers that the "firewagon" (the Chinese word for the newly built train) takes people south for a fee.
    ellauri083.html on line 143: In the city, O-Lan and the children beg while Wang Lung pulls a rickshaw. Wang Lung's father begs but does not earn any money, and sits looking at the city instead. They find themselves aliens among their more metropolitan countrymen who look different and speak in a fast accent. They no longer starve, due to the one-cent charitable meals of congee, but still live in abject poverty. Wang Lung longs to return to his land. When armies approach the city he can only work at night hauling merchandise out of fear of being conscripted. One time, his son brings home stolen meat. Furious, Wang Lung throws the meat on the ground, not wanting his sons to grow up as thieves. O-Lan, however, calmly picks up the meat and cooks it. When a food riot erupts, Wang Lung is swept up in a mob that is looting a rich man's house and corners the man himself, who fears for his life and gives Wang Lung all his money in order to buy his safety. O-Lan finds a cache of jewels elsewhere in house and takes them for herself.
    ellauri083.html on line 145: Wang Lung uses this money to bring the family home, buy a new ox and farm tools, and hire servants to work the land for him. In time, two more children are born, a twin son and daughter. When he discovers the jewels that O-Lan looted, Wang Lung buys the House of Hwang's remaining land. He later sends his first two sons to school, also apprenticing the second one to a merchant, and retains the third one on the land.
    ellauri083.html on line 147: As Wang Lung becomes more prosperous, he buys a concubine named Lotus. O-Lan endures the betrayal of her husband when he takes the only jewels she had asked to keep for herself, two pearls, so that he can make them into earrings to present to Lotus. O-Lan's health and morale deteriorate, and she eventually dies just after witnessing her first son's wedding. Wang Lung finally appreciates her place in his life as he mourns her passing. Farewell my concubine.
    ellauri083.html on line 149: Wang Lung and his family move into town and rent the old House of Hwang. Now an old man, he desires peace within his family but is annoyed by constant disputes, especially between his first and second sons and their wives. Wang Lung's third son runs away to become a soldier. At the end of the novel, Wang Lung overhears his sons planning to sell the land and tries to dissuade them. They say they will do as he wishes, but smile knowingly at each other. Ah what's the use...
    ellauri083.html on line 155: The novel is considered among the foremost examples of social realism in Icelandic fiction in the 1930s. It is an indictment of materialism, the cost of the self-reliant spirit to relationships, and capitalism itself. This book, along with several other major novels, helped Laxness win the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1955.
    ellauri083.html on line 157: Independent People is the story of the sheep farmer Guðbjartur Jónsson, generally known in the novel as Bjartur of Summerhouses, and his struggle for independence.
    ellauri083.html on line 159: The "first chapter summons up the days when the world was first settled, in 874 AD—for that is the year when the Norsemen arrived in Iceland, and one of the book's wry conceits is that no other world but Iceland exists. ... The book is set in the early decades of the twentieth century but ... Independent People is a pointedly timeless tale. It reminds us that life on an Icelandic croft had scarcely altered over a millennium". As the story begins, Bjartur ("bright" or "fair") has recently managed to put down the first payment on his own farm, after eighteen years working as a shepherd at Útirauðsmýri, the home of the well-to-do local bailiff, a man he detests. The land that he buys is said to be cursed by Saint Columba, referred to as "the fiend Kolumkilli", and haunted by an evil woman named Gunnvör, who made a pact with Kólumkilli.
    ellauri083.html on line 161: Defiantly, Bjartur refuses to add a stone to Gunnvör's cairn to appease her, and in his optimism also changes the name of the farm from Winterhouses to Summerhouses. He is also newly wed to a young woman called Rósa, a fellow worker at Rauðsmýri, and is determined that they should live as independent people.
    ellauri083.html on line 165: When Bjartur returns, he assumes that Rósa has set the animal loose. When he cannot find her when it comes time to put the sheep inside for the winter, he once more leaves his wife, by now heavily pregnant, to search the mountains for the gimmer. He is delayed by a blizzard, and nearly dies of exposure. On his return to Summerhouses he finds that Rósa has died in childbirth. His dog Titla is curled around the baby girl, still clinging to life due to the warmth of the dog. With help from Rauðsmýri, the child survives; Bjartur decides to raise her as his daughter, and names her Ásta Sóllilja ("beloved sun lily").
    ellauri083.html on line 173: Asta as a girls' name is of Greek and Old Norse origin, and the meaning of Asta is "star-like; love". Also a short form of Anastasia, Astrid, Augusta, etc. Aastha is a Hindi name for girls meaning Faith. Asta is the name of the terrier owned by Nick and Nora Charles in the famous "Thin Man" movies of the 1930s. This name has never ranked among the top 1000 names in America. If you consider naming your baby Asta we recommend you take note of this. Do your research and choose a name wisely, kindly and selflessly.
    ellauri083.html on line 198: Autistit on mukavia kavereja. Siltaveikkoja on lusittu 3 tuotantokautta 4stä. Sarja on täynnä hulluja ja kusipäitä. Koko ajan on pimeää ja ahistaa. Ruumiita tulee kuin saunan takana. Koskaan ei lohkasta vizejä eikä kukaan naura. Rumia tehtaita ja takapihoja. Mixhän tää on niin viihdyttävää? Onxe samanlaista kuin kotona vai onnexi vielä pahempaa? Onnikin on suhteellisen suhteellista. Välj lyckan förrän lyckan väljer dig.
    ellauri083.html on line 209: Elokuvat: A Tale of Two Cities ja Mieletön maailmanhistoria
    ellauri083.html on line 221: Some historians have suggested that Dickens based Defarge on Anne-Josèphe Théroigne de Mericourt, a revolutionary who played a key role in street demonstrations.
    ellauri083.html on line 223: She is one of the main villains of the novel, obsessed with revenge against the Evrémondes. She ruthlessly pursues this goal against Charles Darnay, his wife, Lucie Manette, and their child, for crimes a prior generation of the Evrémonde family had committed.
    ellauri083.html on line 224: She refuses to accept the fairy tale that Charles Darnay changed his ways by "intending" to renounce his title to the lands to give them to the peasants who worked on them. In your dreams Charlie.
    ellauri083.html on line 226: Her consuming need for revenge against the Evrémonde family, including the innocent Darnay and his wife, brings about her death by her own weapon at the hands of Miss Pross.
    ellauri083.html on line 334: When, in turn, this anger proves incapable of restoring the subject to the earlier, wished-for state of things, the characteristic symptoms of clinical depression set in: feelings of helplessness, a tendency to reproach the self for its inadequacy, and, not least of all, the drawing away of cathectic energies from the ego, "emptying [it] until it is totally impoverished." This impoverishment is also referred to by Freud and others as inhibition: "inhibition of all activity," "general inhibition," "complete motor inhibition," or "an inhibition of functions including the interest in the external world." And Bibring has instructively spoken of it as the "exhaustion of ego libido due to an unsolvable conflict" (p. The rhetoric of exhaustion and the exhaustion of rhetoric: Erskine Caldwell in the thirties)
    ellauri083.html on line 336: For all their profusion, these paled in comparison with Sachs's newest display pieces: The Cabinet, 2014, and The Rockeths, 2017. The former was a folding case fashioned from orange-and-white striped barricades and festooned with hundreds of tools, hung in groups and inscribed with the names of individuals who have "inspired, influenced, or frightened" the artist--from Le Corbusier and Louis Kahn to the members of the Wu-Tang Clan--while the latter was less a cabinet than a kind of portable workbench and shelving unit, similarly jam-packed with the tools of the artist's trade, as well as a collection of model rockets, all again labeled to namecheck various figures of personal importance--scientists, musicians, artists; Apollo, Dionysus, Stringer Bell. The fetishistic frisson the assembled materials (pens, pliers, drill bits, tape measures) clearly provoke in Sachs was made even more explicit in McMasterbation, 2016, one of a trio of scale-model space modules arrayed on plinths. Featuring a copy of the legendarily comprehensive McMaster-Carr hardware catalogue spread open like a porn mag centerfold designed for lonely gearheads--alongside a ready supply of Vaseline and a handy tissue dispenser--it was part cathectic confession of objectophilia and part self-derogating indictment of his own work's tendencies toward sometimes masturbatory excess. Smart and stupid, funny and somehow a bit sad, it was classic Sachs: too much information, in every sense of the phrase.
    ellauri083.html on line 338: Hendershot recalls that, in the Schreber case, God was believed to manifest his creative and destructive power as celestial rays (Freud 22). As with spider-webs and hedgehogs quills, this radial pattern describing dilation and contraction, movement back and forth from center to circumference and from circumference to center, is the essential figure for the paranoid narcissism of a subject who feels threatened by the world and guilty for having taken "his own body [...] as his love-object" (Freud 60). Signaling Fistule's repressed homosexuality, the rays of his intelligence had first been focused on the masochistic annihilation of his genitals, which he denies were the original object of his love ("organes hideux," "vomitoires de dejections"), and then had been used in reconstructing a sexless new reality. Insisting on his exemption from the Naturalist law of biological determinism, Fistule denies his human parentage and maintains that he was born of a star, which, shining like the rays of his genius, had inseminated him and allowed him to be the father of himself, causa sui. Homosexual guilt initially projected as the corruptibility of matter is overcome by Fistule's principle of Stellogenesis, which turns flesh into radiance and bodies into starlight. As Hendershot concludes: "In Freud's theory, the paranoiac withdraws from the world (decathexis), directs his or her cathectic energy to the ego resulting in self-aggrandizement, and then attempts to reestablish a cathectic relationship with the world in the form of a delusional system"
    ellauri083.html on line 348: Early seasons aired on network prime time while the Vietnam War was still going on; the show was forced to walk the fine line of commenting on that war while at the same time not seeming to protest against it. For this reason, the show's discourse, under the cover of comedy, often questioned, mocked, and grappled with America's role in the Cold War.
    ellauri083.html on line 354: The finale titled "Goodbye, Farewell and Amen" was the most-watched and highest-rated single television episode in US television history 1983, with a record-breaking 125 million viewers.
    ellauri083.html on line 376: Farrow has steadfastly supported her daughter throughout the years—but in Allen v. Farrow, she says she has also grown accustomed to Allen attacking her character and parenting skills in the press. (For decades Allen has claimed that Farrow coached Dylan, goading her into accusing Allen after Allen left Farrow for Previn.) Farrow explains her conflicting feelings to the cameras, saying that she wholeheartedly supported Dylan’s decision to write a 2014 op-ed for The New York Times outlining the abuse she claims to have suffered. But privately, Farrow admits in the docuseries, she “crumpled up inside,” knowing that Allen would likely resume his media attacks on her. “He couldn’t go after Dylan, because she was a child at the time, so he’d come after me.”
    ellauri083.html on line 378: “What astounds me,” said Ziering in an interview, is that for the past nearly three decades, people assume that this has been a matter of “he said, she said”—meaning Allen’s word versus Farrow’s. But after Ziering and codirector Kirby Dick began their research, they realized, “Actually, it’s been a ‘he said, he said’ situation. Mia didn’t even speak until the Vanity Fair interview [in 2013]. Never. She is such a private person. That’s really important to know. And she was sort of blindsided by all these events that happened to her. And kept trying to navigate the best that she could just to protect her children and family.”
    ellauri083.html on line 417: Quorassa apinat kysyvät ja ize vastaavat. Kaikista kauhistavinta ja samalla hauskinta on kuinka helevetin tyhmiä siis vaan tietämättömiä (myös tarkoituxella, ne on usein samalla myös omanedunajajia ja tyhmänilkeitä) apinoita on (etenkin jenkeissä), ja niitä on jopa kymmeniä ellei satoja miljoonia. Tässä muutamia esimerkkejä.
    ellauri083.html on line 424: This is another argument the Christian should not use. It is rapidly becoming obsolete, thank God.
    ellauri083.html on line 430: From time to time, one hears that NASA computers have proved the account of the unusual day that accompanied the Battle of Gibeon found in Joshua 10:12–14. This marvelous little story about NASA computers began circulating in the late 1960s and early 1970s, during the heyday of the Apollo program. According to the story, in preparation for the Apollo moon landings, a computer at NASA calculated the positions of the earth, moon, and other solar system bodies with great precision far into the past and future.
    ellauri083.html on line 432: This computer program produced a glitch in the fifteenth century BC, a glitch caused by solar system bodies not being in their correct positions, indicating that nearly a day was missing from time. An additional 40 minutes also was missing several centuries later, so that the total missing time was one full day.
    ellauri083.html on line 434: Supposedly, NASA scientists and engineers puzzled over this problem until one of them opened the Bible to Joshua 10:12–14 and 2 Kings 20:8–11. The NASA personnel supposedly came to realize that their missing day could be explained by addition of nearly a day at the time of Joshua and an additional 40 minutes at the time of Hezekiah, thus proving that these biblical events actually occurred.
    ellauri083.html on line 436: This story is not new, but rather it is a modern retelling of an even older story. In the 1930s, Harry Rimmer made reference to how science had proved the missing day of Joshua, and this story continued to circulate within Christian circles for decades. Rimmer’s mention of this may have been the origin of Hill’s story. Rimmer based his statement upon an 1890 book by C. A. L. Totten, Joshua’s Long Day and the Dial of Ahaz, a Scientific Vindication and “a Midnight Cry.” Totten did a very elaborate computation of the date of the battle of Gibeon since the creation.
    ellauri083.html on line 438: He reasoned that the battle was on the twenty-fourth day of the fourth month of the Hebrew civil calendar in the 2,555th year after the creation. This was the 933,285th day since creation. From this, Totten determined that this day was a Tuesday. Next, Totten calculated backward in time from June 17, 1890 to the battle of Gibeon. He concluded that the battle was 1,217,530 days previously, which was a Wednesday. Hence, there was a day missing. Of course, Totten’s computation required very precise dates, something that most people today would find ludicrous. However, Totten managed to obtain some audience in the late 19th century. While most people today are not impressed with such an approach, apparently invoking a computer, as in the Hill story, is sufficient to convince some people today. This story has been debunked many times, so it is a shame that it keeps being repeated.
    ellauri083.html on line 440: The fact that NASA computers have not proved the account of Joshua’s long day does not mean that there was no miracle at the battle of Gibeon as recorded in the book of Joshua. We know that God’s word is inspired. Therefore, we know that the Bible is authoritative in all things, including history. Since Joshua 10:12–14 tells us that God performed this miracle, we can be assured that indeed He did perform this miracle. As Joshua 10:14 described it, “There has been no day like it before or since” (ESV).
    ellauri083.html on line 500: The Hulk is incredibly strong and throughout most of the films he acts largely on the instinct of self-preservation, attacking anything that he perceives as a threat. Over time, Banner demonstrated an increasing ability to control the transformation, calling the Hulk at will, but was generally not able to recall events during the time he was in that form. The Hulk, conversely, became increasingly aware of Banner and able to stall the transformation back – one time staying in Hulk form for two years, becoming able to speak with others and control his destructive rage. Eventually, Banner was able to merge with the Hulk, combining Banner's mind and personality with the Hulk's body and strength.
    ellauri083.html on line 514: I will tell you why; so shall my anticipation prevent your discovery, and your secrecy to the King and Queen moult no feather. I have of late, but wherefore I know not, lost all my mirth, forgone all custom of exercises; and indeed, it goes so heavily with my disposition that this goodly frame the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory; this most excellent canopy the air, look you, this brave o’erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. What a piece of work is man! How noble in reason? How infinite in faculties, in form and moving, how express and admirable? In action how like an angel? In apprehension, how like a god? The beauty of the world, the paragon of animals. And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me; no, nor woman neither, though by your smiling you seem to say so.
    ellauri083.html on line 529: I can’t say I really see it at all. As much as I love this book, the only person who I would say comes close to experiencing “complicated joy” is Mario, whose emotions are simple and straightforward, only made more complex by his contorted body. I think most people in the book experience a sort of numbness, or they are searching for a kind of numbness. To me, even Gately’s emotions and thoughts are dulled by the inane daily tasks he must complete, although I suppose you could argue that being free from substance addiction gives him a small sense of pride.
    ellauri083.html on line 552: I said in mine heart, Go to now, I will prove thee with mirth, therefore enjoy pleasure: and, behold, this also is vanity.
    ellauri083.html on line 561: Then I commended mirth, because a man hath no better thing under the sun, than to eat, and to drink, and to be merry: for that shall abide with him of his labour the days of his life, which God giveth him under the sun.
    ellauri083.html on line 575: For thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will cause to cease out of this place in your eyes, and in your days, the voice of mirth, and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom, and the voice of the bride.
    ellauri083.html on line 597: Glory and honour are in his presence; strength and gladness are in his place.
    ellauri083.html on line 606: And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.
    ellauri083.html on line 621: And now shall mine head be lifted up above mine enemies round about me: therefore will I offer in his tabernacle sacrifices of joy; I will sing, yea, I will sing praises unto the LORD.
    ellauri083.html on line 669: Abraham couldn’t keep himself contained, “Abraham fell on his face and laughed, and said to himself, ‘Shall a child be born to a man who is a hundred years old? Shall Sarah, who is ninety years old, bear a child?'”
    ellauri083.html on line 677: Another humorous episode happened in the book of Numbers, when the People of Israel were complaining in the desert. They called out like a petulant child, “O that we had meat to eat! We remember the fish we ate in Egypt for nothing, the cucumbers, the melons, the leeks, the onions, and the garlic, but now our strength is dried up, and there is nothing at all but this manna to look at” (Numbers 11:4-6).
    ellauri083.html on line 683: In the book of Kings, Elijah is having a “Battle Royale” with some pagan priests and taunts them by saying, “Call louder, for he is a god; he may be busy doing his business, or may be on a journey. Perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened.” (1 Kings 18:27). Some translations make “doing his business” more explicit by translating it as, “relieving himself.” This is in accord with the original Hebrew and so Elijah is taunting them by saying their god might be busy going to the bathroom!
    ellauri088.html on line 39: Tulokas on yxi pienestä tosin kasvavasta kourallisesta skififilmejä joissa on NAINEN pääosassa. Joku Eric Heisserer on huomauttanut että joukko studioista lupasi ottaa leffan vaan jos sankari vaihdettaisiin miehexi. Mutta päähenkilön, lingvistiikkaexpertin (Louise Banx) naismaisuus on kriittinen osa hahmon identiteettiä. (Oikeastikin valtaosa lingvisteistä on naisia!) Hollywoodin skifi on historiallisesti luottanut sankarillisiin, toimintasuuntautuneisiin miesesitaistelijoihin. Tulokas on sixi aivan omituinen, kun siinä on briljantti, komplexi sankaritar joka ei saisi edes valomiekkaa päälle.
    ellauri088.html on line 97: Several sensations form an idea. Several feelings form a composite feeling. Emotions are affective processes over time (they have a beginning, a middle, and an end). Volitions are changes in ideas or feelings that bring an emotion to an end. oAApperception is also relevant to clinical psychology. Projective tests such as the Rorschach and the TAT are based on the concept of apperception. (TAT: Thematic Apperception Test) Why is it that we perceive reality this or that way? Skewed perception may be connected with mental illness. Like seeing naked women undressing everywhere. There is a will involved there.
    ellauri088.html on line 167: Välillä sopii tehä vähän mindfulnessia. Se on jotain buddhismin ja trainspottingin välimuotoa.

    ellauri088.html on line 230: In general, green is what you’d normally call “universal healthcare free at point of service”. Blue denotes “free but not universal”; the US is in a category basically its own, “Not free but universal”, which reflects how Obamacare is a strange hybrid. I’d say what you’re looking for is “the second most developed non-green country on this map”.
    ellauri088.html on line 299: Kettusella oli usein voimakkaita näkemyksiä ja hän kiisteli moneen otteeseen Lauri Hakulisen kanssa muun muassa kielen historiasta. Useammassa kuin yhdessä kiistakysymyksessä on vasta myöhempi tutkimus kyennyt osoittamaan ”rabulisti Kettusen” näkemyksen oikeaksi.
    ellauri088.html on line 312: Laten Vatjan kielen äännehistoria (1915) jää toiseksi vain E.A. Tunkelolle.
    ellauri088.html on line 313: Einon pääteos, lähes tuhatsivuinen Vepsän kielen äännehistoria ilmestyi vasta 1946. Se on yhä eräs laajimmista suomalais-ugrilaisista kielistä kirjoitetuista monografioista.
    ellauri088.html on line 557: Plans discussed.—Pleasures of “camping-out,” on fine nights.—Ditto, wet nights.—Compromise decided on.—Montmorency, first impressions of.—Fears lest he is too good for this world, fears subsequently dismissed as groundless.—Meeting adjourns.
    ellauri088.html on line 565: Kingston.—Instructive remarks on early English history.—Instructive observations on carved oak and life in general.—Sad case of Stivvings, junior.—Musings on antiquity.—I forget that I am steering.—Interesting result.—Hampton Court Maze.—Harris as a guide.
    ellauri088.html on line 581: Then Harris tried to open the tin with a pocket-knife, and broke the knife and cut himself badly; and George tried a pair of scissors, and the scissors flew up, and nearly put his eye out. While they were dressing their wounds, I tried to make a hole in the thing with the spiky end of the hitcher, and the hitcher slipped and jerked me out between the boat and the bank into two feet of muddy water, and the tin rolled over, uninjured, and broke a teacup.
    ellauri088.html on line 583: Then we all got mad. We took that tin out on the bank, and Harris went up into a field and got a big sharp stone, and I went back into the boat and brought out the mast, and George held the tin and Harris held the sharp end of his stone against the top of it, and I took the mast and poised it high up in the air, and gathered up all my strength and brought it down.
    ellauri088.html on line 585: It was George’s straw hat that saved his life that day. He keeps that hat now (what is left of it), and, of a winter’s evening, when the pipes are lit and the boys are telling stretchers about the dangers they have passed through, George brings it down and shows it round, and the stirring tale is told anew, with fresh exaggerations every time.
    ellauri088.html on line 612: Jerome volunteered eagerly to serve his country at the outbreak of the great war, but, being 55 years old, was rejected by the British Army. Eager to serve in some capacity, he volunteered as an ambulance driver for the French Army.
    ellauri088.html on line 635: Toblerin huolekas nuori tytär Hildegard valmistaa hotellia vielä ennen Toblerin lähtöä salaa valepukuisen miljunäärin vierailuun ja sen tottumuxiin, mutta ei tule maininneexi salanimeä. Virheellisesti luullaan tri Fritz Hagedornia, työtöntä mainosammattimiestä, joka on voittanut kilpakirjoituxen 1. palkinnon (1 viikko Grand hotellia) pohataxi ja hemmotellaan vastaavalla tavalla. Tobler sitävastoin työnnetään pieneen lämmittämättömään ullakkokammariin, henkilökunta ilkkuu sitä ja panee sen sekatöihin. Jo ekana päivänä Tobler ystävystyy Hagedornin kaa, vaikka kauhistunut staabi koittaa estää veljeilyn niiden välillä. Johann informoi Hildegardia sekaannuxesta ja sen seurauxista. Hildegaard ei kestä enää kotona ja ilmestyy Toblerin emännöizijän Frau Kunkelin kanssa, jonka nimexi ilmoitetaan Julchen-täti, hotelliin iskää kazomaan. Fritz rakastuu tietysti Hildegard „Schulze“en, ja ne sepittävät salaa hääsuunnitelmia. (Hildegard oli sanonut Fritzulle, että sillä on sama sukunimi kuin Eduardilla.)
    ellauri089.html on line 42: Matheis Heinlein arrived in Pennsylvania in 1754. Spelling variations of this family name include: Hainberg, Hainberger, Hainburger, Heynberg, Heynberger, Heinberg and many more. Itävaltalaista aatelia. Hohoo, Pelkkää puppua jolla myydään jenkkihöynille vaakunamukeja. Eigentlich ist es so:
    ellauri089.html on line 48: Robert Anson Heinlein (/ˈhaɪnlaɪn/; July 7, 1907 – May 8, 1988) was an American science-fiction author, aeronautical engineer, and Naval officer. Sometimes called the "dean of science fiction writers", he was among the first to emphasize scientific accuracy in his fiction, and was thus a pioneer of the subgenre of hard science fiction. His published works, both fiction and non-fiction, express admiration for competence and emphasize the value of critical thinking. His work continues to have an influence on the science-fiction genre, and on modern culture more generally.
    ellauri089.html on line 51: He was a sixth-generation German-American; a family tradition had it that Heinleins fought in every American war, starting with the War of Independence. Jim Marlowe, in Red Planet, and Don Harvey, in Between Planets, participate in insurrections patterned after the American Revolution, a plot Heinlein would most fully exploit in his adult novel, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (1966).
    ellauri089.html on line 59: He spent his childhood in Kansas City, Missouri. The outlook and values of this time and place (in his own words, "The Bible Belt") had a definite influence on his fiction, especially in his later works.
    ellauri089.html on line 62: Heinlein's experience in the Navy exerted a strong influence on his character and writing. In 1929, he graduated from the Naval Academy with the equivalent of a Bachelor of Arts degree in Engineering, ranking fifth in his class academically but with a class standing of 20th of 243 due to disciplinary demerits.
    ellauri089.html on line 67: And the psychological testing, in which the boys are tested for certain character traits (and through which Heinlein begins to articulate his own philosophy about winners and losers), is even more fascinating.
    ellauri089.html on line 69: Heinlein draws on his knowledge of school societies to make the Academy a “real” place; there are bull sessions, roommate problems, anxieties about passing, shared food packages, and parties at the Academy just as there are at any school, especially a boarding school or college. Also, as Matt becomes more and more a Cadet, he finds, as do many of Heinlein’s juvenile heroes, that he has grown beyond his family and that there is an unbridgeable gulf between his perspective as a Cadet and his parents’ perspectives as ground-dwellers in Kansas City. His living and working in space is a part of it, but even more important, Matt realizes, is his membership in an international/interplanetary organization. He is no longer the boy he was when he left home. He becomes aware of this difference and, understanding it, is able to deal with a family that now seems somewhat provincial to him.
    ellauri089.html on line 72: Bill does not want the responsibility of keeping Earth peaceful, a responsibility that could require him, in an extreme situation, to bomb his own country. Loooooseeer!
    ellauri089.html on line 74: Another Cadet, Girard Burke, is asked to resign. The reader has know for a long time that Burke, who is certainly mentally and physically capable, does not have the right attitude to be a Patrolman. He is, among other things, too skeptical of the ideals for which the Patrol stands. Burke resigns, goes into his father’s business, becomes an ship’s captain immediately, gets himself in venereal trouble on Venus, and has to call on the Patrol to rescue him from his own self-centered and stupid mistakes. Matt, Tex, and Oscar do rescue him and, with that action, prove the worth of the characteristics—perseverance, loyalty, intelligence, idealism, integrity, and courage—that Heinlein champions throughout Space Cadet and the other novels in the series. Vittu mikä nazi.
    ellauri089.html on line 77: Heinlein used his science fiction to earn money and as a way to explore his provocative social and political ideas, and to speculate how progress in science and engineering might shape the future of politics, race, religion, and sex. Within the framework of his science-fiction stories, Heinlein repeatedly addressed certain social themes: the importance of being earnest, individual liberty and self-reliance, the nature of incestual sexual relationships, the obligation individuals owe to their societies, the influence of organized religion on culture and government, and the tendency of society to repress nonconformist thought. He also speculated on the influence of space travel on human cultural practices.
    ellauri089.html on line 87: Ginny undoubtedly served as a model for many of his intelligent, fiercely independent female characters. She was a chemist and rocket test engineer, and held a higher rank in the Navy than Heinlein himself. She was also an accomplished college athlete, earning four letter words.
    ellauri089.html on line 96: When Robert A. Heinlein opened his Colorado Springs newspaper on April 5, 1958, he read a full-page ad demanding that the Eisenhower Administration stop testing nuclear weapons. The science fiction author was flabbergasted. He called for the formation of the Patrick Henry League and spent the next several weeks writing and publishing his own polemic that lambasted "Communist-line goals concealed in idealistic-sounding nonsense" and urged Americans not to become "soft-headed".
    ellauri089.html on line 103: He wanted to do his own juvenile work, stating that: "I want to do my own stuff, my own way". Vapaa sexi kiinnosti. Kirjassa Strangers in a strange land se oli aivan daft. Jill is homophobic and says that "nine times out of ten, if a girl gets raped it's partly her own fault." Bobia kiinnosti myös insesti. Heinlein often posed in situations where the nominal purpose of sexual taboos was irrelevant to a particular situation, due to future advances in technology.
    ellauri089.html on line 108: “[T]here seems to have been an actual decline in rational thinking. The United States had become a place where entertainers and professional athletes were mistaken for people of importance. They were idolized and treated as leaders; their opinions were sought on everything and they took themselves just as seriously—after all, if an entertainer is paid a million or more a year, he knows he is important ... so his opinions of foreign affairs and domestic policies must be important, too, even though he proves himself to be ignorant and subliterate every time he opens his mouth.”
    ellauri089.html on line 116: There's no gap between will and action, for Heinlein's juveniles adulthood is devotion to something they want to do. This is the origin of the books' guilelessness—for that worldview is innocence, down at its root, even when the grand theme of a book is slavery, war, or survival in harsh circumstances. Being human isn't an insoluble problem for them. It's a puzzle that has a solution: be juvenile. What made Robert Heinlein inimitable was the easiness of the people in those stories.
    ellauri089.html on line 124: During the 1930s and 1940s, Heinlein was deeply interested in Alfred Korzybski's general semantics and attended a number of seminars on the subject. His views on epistemology seem to have flowed from that interest, and his fictional characters continue to express Korzybskian views to the very end of his writing career.
    ellauri089.html on line 126: Many of his stories, such as Gulf, If This Goes On—, and Stranger in a Strange Land, depend strongly on the premise, related to the well-known Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, that by using a correctly designed language, one can change or improve oneself mentally, or even realize untapped potential.
    ellauri089.html on line 138: Growing up Mr. Heinlein was and still is one of my favorite writers...He is old school none of this sodomite loving and liberal rectum kissing for him he was a TRUE Flag Waving AMERICAN Patriot! And we need MEN like him today and NOT that COMMIE Sodomite Rag Head Zebera occupying OUR White House today!
    ellauri089.html on line 145: Even more surprising, the sociological aspects of these books have also stood up well over the years. Boys today may not be quite as innocent about girls as they appear to be in most of Heinlein’s juveniles (perhaps at the request of Scribner’s editor Alice Dalgliesh), but the various interpersonal relationships (boy-girl, parent-child, sibling-sibling) do still ring quite true. Today’s young readers may have to ask what a “soda jerk” is, but they will have no trouble understanding why Kip, the hero of Have Space Suit—Will Travel, tosses a chocolate milkshake all over his tormentor.
    ellauri089.html on line 151: Certainly his best-known and most successful books came after the decision to write entirely for an adult audience, with Stranger in a Strange Land in 1961 and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress in 1966. And in such books as Farnham's Freehold (1964), he clearly felt freer to express the libertinism that had been implicit in all his earlier published work.
    ellauri089.html on line 153: Most of what Heinlein wrote after 1958 explores ideas that are more interesting, more profound, in certain senses, than any of his early work, like quirky sex. But at some point, even his most fervent fans want to return to books where the hero doesn't use time travel and advanced technology to have sex with his mother, his granddaughter, and his own clone. Or his computer made flesh.
    ellauri089.html on line 172: July 20, 1969, is probably the most important day in human history - the day men from Earth first set foot on another planet, Earth's moon. Robert Heinlein was a guest commentator (along with Arthur C. Clarke) with Walter Cronkite on this historic occasion.
    ellauri089.html on line 186: Toinen on leidi-ihailuun huolellisesti piilotettu naisviha. Siihen liittyy kolmantena heikosti kätketty narsismi, joidenka takia Kip paljastuu loppupeleissä kadonneexi älypuuhisten prinssixi ja oikeasti fixummaxi kuin sen esibuberteettinen ärsyttävä pissis geniusprinsessa.
    ellauri089.html on line 202: On the way they unknowingly enjoy the Texas hospitality of Satan himself, but as they near their destination they are separated by the Rapture — Margrethe worships Odin, and pagans do not go to Heaven. Finding that the reward for his faith, eternity as promised in the Book of Revelation, is worthless without her, Alex journeys through timeless space in search of his lost lady, taking him to Hell and beyond.
    ellauri089.html on line 205: Dave Langford reviewed Job: A Comedy of Justice for White Dwarf #61, and stated that "When blasphemy stops being witty and shocking, it tends to become pointless, like graffiti scrawled on church wall. I didn't dislike this one, but . . . wait for the paperback, eh?"
    ellauri089.html on line 207: Mä luulen että tää Jobin tarina on Bobin omaelämäkerrallista job historya. Margarethe on sen ateistijuutalainen emäntä. Aikaisemmin Bob oli todennut mm. seuraavaa:
    ellauri089.html on line 210: Men rarely if ever manage to dream up a god superior to themselves. Most gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child. One man's theology is another man's belly laugh. The most ridiculous concept ever perpetrated by Homo Sapiens is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of his creations, that he can be persuaded by their prayers, and becomes petulant if he does not receive this flattery. Yet this ridiculous notion, without one real shred of evidence to bolster it, has gone on to found one of the oldest, largest and least productive industries in history.
    ellauri089.html on line 289: Kun Mandelstam sanoi, “Emmä kirjota. Mä vaan suollan puhetta",” se tarkoitti mitä sanoi. Mandelstamin huonouninen seinänaapuri 1920-luvulla kuvasi sitä: “pää heitettynä taaxepäin Osip Mandelstam vaeltaa ympäri taloa. Se lausuu säkeitä säkeiden perään päivät pääxytysten. Runot syntyvät raskaina. Jokainen säe erixeen.” Ja näin kuvasi sitä Sergei Rudakov, nuori filologi ja runoilija joka kävi Mandelsteinin pakeilla maanpaossa Voronezhissä 1935: “Mandelstamilla on hullu tapa työskennellä… mä seison toimivan runokoneen edessä (tai ehkä se on runoelin, paremminkin)… Miestä ei enää ole; se on pikemminkin joku Michelangelo. Se näkee eikä muista mitään. Se vaeltaa ympäriinsä mutisten: ‘Kuin musta sananjalka vihreässä yössä.’ Neljää säettä varten se polottaa neljäsataa, oikeesti… Se ei muista omia runojaan. Se toistaa izeään ja jättää pois toistot paizi tyylikeinoja, ja pitää uudet säkeet.”
    ellauri089.html on line 401: Preface. It appears to me that in Ethics, as in all other philosophical studies, the difficulties and disagreements, of which its history is full, are mainly due to a very simple cause: namely to the attempt to answer questions, without first discovering precisely what question it is which you desire to answer. ...
    ellauri089.html on line 407: § 2. but this is not that they are concerned with human conduct, but that they are concerned with a certain predicate "good", and its converse "bad", which may be applied both to conduct and to other things. …
    ellauri089.html on line 413: § 5. It must, however, enquire not only what things are universally related to goodness, but also, what this predicate, to which they are related, is: …
    ellauri089.html on line 415: § 6. and the answer to this question is that it is indefinable … indefinable ja simple ei ole sama asia. G.E.Mooren määäritelmäteoria oli aika alkeellista tasoa. Kyllä "hyvä" on hajotettavissa tekijöihin ja sillä on oma logiikka, kuten olen osoittanut tärkeässä artikkelissani hyvästä joka ilmestyi Kouvolan julkaisusarjassa.
    ellauri089.html on line 419: § 8. and of the three senses in which "definition" can be used, this is the most important. …
    ellauri089.html on line 421: § 9. What is thus indefinable is not "the good", or the whole of that which always possesses the predicate "good", but this predicate itself. …
    ellauri089.html on line 423: § 10. "Good", then, denotes one unique simple object of thought among innumerable others; but this object has very commonly been identified with some other—a fallacy which may be called "the naturalistic fallacy" … Tässä Jyriltä alkaa lähteä riimu käsistä. Sillä on niin iso lehmälauma ojassa, ettei se pysty pitelemään sitä. 1 lehmistä on että ainoa merkizevä hyvä on termiittiapinoiden hyvä, lehmistä ei mitään väliä. Niitä on hyvä popsia aivan vapaasti. Koska lehmät ei ole meikäläisiä, niillä ei ole sielua, ei äänioikeutta eikä armeijaa, ja ne maistuu meistä apinoista hyvältä. So there!
    ellauri089.html on line 427: § 12. The nature of this fallacy is easily recognised; …
    ellauri089.html on line 443: § 20. The term "organic whole" might well be used to denote that a whole has this property, since, of the two other properties which it is commonly used to imply, …
    ellauri089.html on line 445: § 21. one, that of reciprocal causal dependence between parts, has no necessary relation to this one, …
    ellauri089.html on line 453: § 24. This and the two following chapters will consider certain proposed answers to the second of ethical questions: What is good in itself? These proposed answers are characterised by the facts (1) that they declare some one kind of thing to be alone good in itself; and (2) that they do so, because they suppose this one thing to define the meaning of "good". …
    ellauri089.html on line 455: § 25. Such theories may be divided into two groups (1) Metaphysical, (2) Naturalistic; and the second group may be subdivided into two others, (a) theories which declare some natural object, other than pleasure, to be sole good, (b) Hedonism. This present chapter will deal with (a). …
    ellauri089.html on line 469: § 32. but Mr Spencer is vague as to the ethical relations of "pleasure" and "evolution", and his Naturalism may be mainly Naturalistic Hedonism. …
    ellauri089.html on line 481: § 37. Hedonism may be defined as the doctrine that "Pleasure is the sole good"; this doctrine has always been held by Hedonists and used by them as a fundamental ethical principle, although it has commonly been confused with others. …
    ellauri089.html on line 483: § 38. The method pursued in this chapter will consist in exposing the reasons commonly offered for the truth of Hedonism and in bringing out the reasons, which suffice to shew it untrue, by a criticism of J. S. Mill & H. Sidgwick. …
    ellauri089.html on line 493: § 43. Mill attempts to reconcile his doctrine that pleasure is the sole object of desire with his admission that other things are desired, by the absurd declaration that what is a means to happiness is "a part" of happiness. …
    ellauri089.html on line 505: § 49. Prof. Sidgwick has avoided those confusions made by Mill: in considering his arguments we shall, therefore, merely consider the question "Is pleasure the sole good?"
    ellauri089.html on line 507: § 50. Prof. Sidgwick first tries to show that nothing outside of Human Existence can be good. Reasons are given for doubting this. …
    ellauri089.html on line 517: § 55. and in his first, the appeal to reflective intuition, he fails to put the question clearly (1) in that he does not recognize the principle of organic unities; …
    ellauri089.html on line 527: § 60. This confusion is further brought out by an examination of Prof. Sidgwick's contrary view; …
    ellauri089.html on line 529: § 61. and it is shewn that, in consequence of this confusion, his representation of "the relation of Rational Egoism to Rational Benevolence" as "the profoundest problem of Ethics", and his view that a certain hypothesis is required to "make Ethics rational", are grossly erroneous. …
    ellauri089.html on line 535: § 64. Certain ambiguities in the conception of Utilitarianism are noticed; and it is pointed out (1) that, as a doctrine of the end to be pursued, it is finally refuted by the refutation of Hedonism, and (2) that, while the arguments most commonly urged in its favour could, at most, only shew it to offer a correct criterion of right action, they are quite insufficient even for this purpose. …
    ellauri089.html on line 548: § 69. But the theory, by which I have defined Metaphysical Ethics, is not that Metaphysics has a logical bearing upon the question involved in practical Ethics "What effects will my action produce?", but that it has such a bearing upon the fundamental ethical question, "What is good in itself?" This theory has been refuted by the proof, in Chap. I, that the naturalistic fallacy is a fallacy; it only remains to discuss certain confusions which seem to have lent it plausibility. …
    ellauri089.html on line 550: § 70. One such source of confusion seems to lie in the failure to distinguish between the proposition "This is good", when it means "This existing thing is good", and the same proposition, when it means "The existence of this kind of thing would be good"; …
    ellauri089.html on line 556: § 73. One cause of this supposition seems to be the logical prejudice that all propositions are of the most familiar type—that in which subject and predicate are both existents. …
    ellauri089.html on line 558: § 74. But ethical propositions cannot be reduced to this type: in particular, they are obviously to be distinguished …
    ellauri089.html on line 564: § 77. This latter confusion is one of the sources of the prevalent modern doctrine that "being good" is identical with "being willed"; but the prevalence of this doctrine seems to be chiefly due to other causes. I shall try to shew with regard to it (1) what are the chief errors which seem to have led to its adoption; and (2) that, apart from it, the Metaphysics of Volition can hardly have the smallest logical bearing upon Ethics. …
    ellauri089.html on line 568: § 79. The actual relations between "goodness" and Will or Feeling, from which this false doctrine is inferred, seem to be mainly (a) the causal relation consisting in the fact that it is only by reflection upon the experiences of Will and Feeling that we become aware of ethical distinctions; (b) the facts that a cognition of goodness is perhaps always included in certain kinds of Willing and Feeling, and is generally accompanied by them: …
    ellauri089.html on line 572: § 81. and, once this analogy between Volition and Cognition is accepted, the view that ethical propositions have an essential reference to Will or Feeling, is strengthened by another error with regard to the nature of Cognition—the error of supposing that "perception" denotes merely a certain way of cognising an object, whereas it actually includes the assertion that the object is also true. …
    ellauri089.html on line 578: § 84. The fact that the metaphysical writers who, like Green, attempt to base Ethics on Volition, do not even attempt this independent investigation, shows that they start from the false assumption that goodness is identical with being willed, and hence that their ethical reasonings have no value whatsoever. …
    ellauri089.html on line 587: § 86. The question to be discussed in this chapter must be clearly distinguished from the two questions hitherto discussed, namely (1) What is the nature of the proposition: "This is good in itself"? …
    ellauri089.html on line 591: § 88. In this chapter we shall deal with the third object of ethical enquiry: namely answers to the question "What conduct is a means to good results?" or "What ought we to do?" This is the question of Practical Ethics, and its answer involves an assertion of causal connection. …
    ellauri089.html on line 593: § 89. It is shewn that the assertions "This action is right" or "is my duty" are equivalent to the assertion that the total results of the action in question will be the best possible; …
    ellauri089.html on line 595: § 90. and the rest of the chapter will deal with certain conclusions, upon which light is thrown by this fact. Of which the first is (1) that Intuitionism is mistaken; since no proposition with regard to duty can be self-evident. …
    ellauri089.html on line 597: § 91. (2) It is plain that we cannot hope to prove which among all the actions, which it is possible for us to perform on every occasion, will produce the best total results: to discover what is our "duty", in this strict sense, is impossible. It may, however, be possible to shew which among the actions, which we are likely to perform, will produce the best results. …
    ellauri089.html on line 601: § 93. (3) Even this latter task is immensely difficult, and no adequate proof that the total results of one action are superior to those of another, has ever been given. For (a) we can only calculate actual results within a comparatively near future. We must, therefore, assume that no results of the same action in the infinite future beyond, will reverse the balance—an assumption which perhaps can be, but certainly has not been, justified; …
    ellauri089.html on line 603: § 94. and (b) even to decide that, of any two actions, one has a better total result than the other in the immediate future, is very difficult; and it is very improbable, and quite impossible to prove, that any single action is in all cases better as means than its probable alternative. Rules of duty, even in this restricted sense, can only, at most, be general truths. …
    ellauri089.html on line 605: § 95. But (c) most of the actions, most universally approved by Common Sense, may perhaps be shewn to be generally better as means than any probable alternative, on the following principles. (1) With regard to some rules it may be shewn that their general observation would be useful in any state of society, where the instincts to preserve and propagate life and to possess property were as strong as they seem always to be; and this utility may be shewn, independently of a right view as to what is good in itself, since the observance is a means to things which are a necessary condition for the attainment of any great goods in considerable quantities. …
    ellauri089.html on line 607: § 96. (2) Other rules are such that their general observance can only be shewn to be useful, as a means to the preservation of society, under more or less temporary conditions: if any of these are to be proved useful in all societies, this can only be done by shewing their causal relation to things good or evil in themselves, which are not generally recognised to be such. …
    ellauri089.html on line 611: § 98. In this way, then, it may be possible to prove the general utility, for the present, of those actions, which in our society are both generally recognized as duties and generally practised; but it seems very doubtful whether a conclusive case can be established for any proposed change in social custom, without an independent investigation of what things are good or bad in themselves. …
    ellauri089.html on line 615: § 100. and that (β) in all other cases, rules of action should not be followed at all, but the individual should consider what positive goods, he, in his particular circumstances, seems likely to be able to effect, and what evils to avoid. …
    ellauri089.html on line 617: § 101. (4) It follows further that the distinction denoted by the terms "duty" and "expediency" is not primarily ethical; when we ask "Is this really expedient?" we are asking precisely the same question as "Is this my duty?", viz. "Is this a means to the best possible?" "Duties" are mainly distinguished by the non-ethical marks (1) that many people are often tempted to avoid them, (2) that their most prominent effects are on others than the agent, (3) that they excite the moral sentiments: so far as they are distinguished by an ethical peculiarity, this is not that they are peculiarly useful to perform, but that they are peculiarly useful to sanction. …
    ellauri089.html on line 627: § 106. but in order fairly to decide upon the intrinsic value of virtue, we must distinguish three different kinds of disposition, each of which is commonly so called and has been maintained to be the only kind deserving the name. Thus (a) the mere unconscious "habit" of performing duties, which is the commonest type, has no intrinsic value whatsoever; Christian moralists are right in implying that mere "external rightness" has no intrinsic value, though they are wrong in saying that it is therefore not "virtuous", since this implies that it has no value as a means. …
    ellauri089.html on line 631: § 108. finally (c) where virtue consists in "conscientiousness", i.e., the disposition not to act, in certain cases, until we believe or feel that our action is right, it seems to have some intrinsic value: the value of this feeling has been peculiarly emphasized by Christian Ethics, but it certainly is not, as Kant would lead us to think, either the sole thing of value, or always good even as a means. …
    ellauri089.html on line 640: § 110. By an "ideal" state of things may be meant either (1) the Summum Bonum or absolutely best, or (2) the best which the laws of nature allow to exist in this world, or (3) anything greatly good in itself: this chapter will be principally occupied with what is ideal in sense (3)—with answering the fundamental question of Ethics. …
    ellauri089.html on line 642: § 111. but a correct answer to this question is an essential step towards a correct view as to what is "ideal" in senses (1) and (2). …
    ellauri089.html on line 646: § 113. and, if we use this method, it is obvious that personal affection and aesthetic enjoyments include by far the greatest goods with which we are acquainted. …
    ellauri089.html on line 652: § 116. But (3) granted that the appropriate combination of these two elements is always a considerable good and may be a very great one, we may ask whether, where there is added to this a true belief in the existence of the object of cognition, the whole thus formed is not much more valuable still. …
    ellauri089.html on line 654: § 117. I think that this question should be answered in the affirmative; but in order to ensure that this judgment is correct, we must carefully distinguish it …
    ellauri089.html on line 660: § 120. We thus get a third essential constituent of many great goods; and in this way we are able to justify (1) the attribution of value to knowledge, over and above its value as a means, and (2) the intrinsic superiority of the proper appreciation of a real object over the appreciation of an equally valuable object of mere imagination: emotions directed towards real objects may thus, even if the object be inferior, claim equality with the highest imaginative pleasures. …
    ellauri089.html on line 662: § 121. Finally (4) with regard to the objects of the cognition which is essential to these good wholes, it is the business of Aesthetics to analyse their nature: it need only be here remarked (1) that, by calling them "beautiful", we mean that they have this relation to a good whole; and (2) that they are, for the most part, themselves complex wholes, such that the admiring contemplation of the whole greatly exceeds in value the sum of the values of the admiring contemplation of the parts. …
    ellauri089.html on line 674: § 127. and (3) the consciousness of intense pain: this appears to be the only thing, either greatly good or greatly evil, which does not involve both a cognition and an emotion directed towards its object; and hence it is not analogous to pleasure in respect of its intrinsic value, while it also seems not to add to the vileness of the whole, as a whole, in which it is combined with another bad thing, whereas pleasure does add to the goodness of a whole, in which it is combined with another good thing; …
    ellauri089.html on line 676: § 128. but pleasure and pain are completely analogous in this, that pleasure by no means always increases, and pain by no means always decreases, the total value of a whole in which it is included: the converse is often true. …
    ellauri089.html on line 678: § 129. In order to consider II. Mixed Goods, we must first distinguish between (1) the value of a whole as a whole, and (2) its value on the whole or total value: (1)=the difference between (2) and the sum of the values of the parts. In view of this distinction, it then appears: …
    ellauri089.html on line 682: § 131. but (2) That a whole which includes a cognition of something evil or ugly may yet be a great positive good on the whole: most virtues, which have any intrinsic value whatever, seem to be of this kind, e.g. (a) courage and compassion, and (b) moral goodness; all these are instances of the hatred or contempt of what is evil or ugly; …
    ellauri090.html on line 70: [14.3. 9.36] Bo Egov: A love letter to his portuguese "novia"
    ellauri090.html on line 105: Following The Posthumous Memoirs of Bras Cubas (1881) and preceding Dom Casmurro (1899), this book is considered by modern critics to be the second of Machado de Assis's realist trilogy, in which the author was concerned with using pessimism and irony to criticize the customs and philosophy of his time, in the process parodying scientism, Social darwinism, and Comte's positivism, although he did not remove all Romantic elements from the plot.
    ellauri090.html on line 107: In contrast to the earlier novel of the trilogy, Quincas Borba was written in third person, telling the story of Rubião, a naive young man who becomes a disciple and later the heir of the titular philosopher Quincas Borba, a character in the earlier novel. While living according to the fictional "Humanitist" philosophy of Quincas Borba, Rubião befriends and is fooled by the greedy Christiano and his wife Sofia who manage to take him for his entire inheritance.
    ellauri090.html on line 110: Juu juu eihän suuri yleisö arvosta tällästä salavittuilua. Ikävää kyynistä negativismia Comten ja muiden talousliberaalien valoisan positivismin sijasta. Tarkemmin sanoen juoni menee näin (credits: Unlock This Study Guide Now):
    ellauri090.html on line 112: Quincas Borba (Joaquim Borba dos Santos), a wealthy man and a self-proclaimed philosopher, dies and leaves his large estate to his friend, Rubião, a teacher. The only condition of the bequest is that Rubião care for Quincas Borba’s dog, also named Quincas Borba, as if the dog were human. Rubião travels from the provincial town of Barbacena to the city of Rio de Janiero to establish himself with his newly inherited wealth. On the train, he meets Christiano Palha and Palha’s wife, Sophia. Rubião soon becomes infatuated with Sophia.
    ellauri090.html on line 114: In Rio, Palha borrows money from Rubião to invest in business, and the two men become partners. Rubião also meets Carlos Maria, an arrogant young man, and Freitas, an unsuccessful middle-aged man, who exploit Rubião for his wealth and innocence. Major Siqueira and his thirty-nine-year-old daughter, Doña Tonica, attach themselves to Rubião, hoping that Rubião will marry Doña Tonica, who meanwhile becomes jealous of Sophia.
    ellauri090.html on line 116: Rubião misinterprets as a love offering a box of strawberries Sophia had sent him. At the Palhas’s house in Santa Thereza, he clutches her hand and makes his affection clear to her. Distressed by Rubião’s advances, Sophia suggests to her husband that they end their relationship with Rubião. Having borrowed money from Rubião, however, Palha is reluctant to break with him.
    ellauri090.html on line 118: Guilt-ridden about his infatuation with Sophia, Rubião begins to worry that the deceased Quincas Borba has somehow transmigrated into his dog’s body. This anxiety is one of the first signs of Rubaio’s impending madness.
    ellauri090.html on line 120: Rubião becomes friends with Dr. Camacho, a lawyer and the editor of a politically oriented newspaper called Atalaia. On his way to meet Dr. Camacho, Rubião rescues a small child, Deolindo, in danger of being run over by a carriage and horses. Rubião then goes on to Dr. Camacho’s office, where he subscribes generously to the capital fund for Atalaia. Dr. Camacho flatters Rubião by publishing an account of Rubião’s heroism in saving Deolindo. Although Rubião is at first modest and dismissive about his heroism, as he reads Camacho’s account he becomes increasingly self-important.
    ellauri090.html on line 122: Maria Benedicta, Sophia’s young cousin, is another potential wife for Rubião, but Rubião is too infatuated with Sophia to be interested in Maria Benedicta. After the incident at Santa Thereza, Rubião appears more cosmopolitan and confident. He spends his inherited money freely, often in support of others in addition to Palha and Dr. Camacho. When his impoverished friend, Freitas, falls ill, Rubião generously gives Freitas’s mother a substantial sum of money. Later, he pays Freitas’s funeral expenses.
    ellauri090.html on line 130: For a time, Rubião’s friends accept his madness as he continues to provide meals and entertainment for them. Eventually, however, Rubião’s house falls into disrepair as his belief in himself as the emperor becomes constant. Doña Tonica becomes engaged to a man who dies before the wedding. Children on the street, including Deolindo, whose life Rubião had saved, make fun of him as a madman. Prodded by Doña Fernanda, a woman who barely knows Rubião, Sophia convinces Palha to set Rubião up in a little rented house on Principe Street. No one visits Rubião in his new humble residence. His former “friends” miss the luxury of Rubião’s wealthy surroundings in the house in Botafogo.
    ellauri090.html on line 132: Rubião continues to believe he is Napoleon III, but Doña Fernanda thinks he can be cured. She manages to get him to enter an asylum. She also rescues Quincas Borba and sends the dog to the sanatorium to be with Rubião. After a short time, appearing to be regaining his sanity, Rubião escapes the asylum and returns to Barbacena with Quincas Borba, his only friend. Rubião dies there, and within three days, Quincas Borba dies there as well.
    ellauri092.html on line 51: Mulla oli päästötodistusta rumentamassa kirkkohissa 9.
    ellauri092.html on line 54: En siihen aikaan tykännyt muutenkaan hissasta. Nyt se on alkanut kiinnostaa. Kun kirjotin filosofis-pyllykielitieteellisiä artikkeleita nuorena mietin ensin ize ja sitten vasta luin related workkia. Nyt kun olen elänyt elämän loppuun kiinnostaa kazoa mihin tuloxiin muut ovat päätyneet. Tuliko samoja arvoja vai toisenlaisia.
    ellauri092.html on line 58: Seijalla oli täysi kybä kirkkohissassa. Wilho oli varmaan ylpeä. Seijan rullaportaat menee ylöspäin Wilhon Lean ja Paulin luo. Mä vilkutan sille toisista portaista jotka kuljettaa mut äidin kaa lapioimaan koxia. Mitäs vanha ilosta kuha on lämmin. No, voihan tästä albumista olla jotain hyötyä. Osoittaahan se jonkinlaista parannusta entiseen. Alkaako taivasikävä vaivata? Olishan se kiva olla Seijan kanssa samalla pilvellä. Koskaan ei ole liian myöhäistä, paizi Alfilla. Wif my luck, se kannetaan ulos jalat edellä kun katumus ja kääntymys on vasta puoliveteessä. Meni jo! huutaa taivaan porukat.
    ellauri092.html on line 63: In engineering, the Moody chart or Moody diagram is a graph in non-dimensional form that relates the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor fD, Reynolds number Re, and surface roughness for fully developed flow in a circular pipe. It can be used to predict pressure drop or flow rate down such a pipe. Lewis Ferry Moody (5 January 1880 – 21 February 1953) was an American engineer and professor, best known for the Moody chart. He has 23 patents for his inventions. He was the first Professor of Hydraulics in the School of Engineering at Princeton. Tästä Moodysta ei löytynyt sen enempää, tuli umpiperä. Not the way out - exit through tunnel in rear, luki MIT:n vessan ovessa. Mutta tämä sensijaan on motherlode:
    ellauri092.html on line 65: Dwight Lyman Moody (February 5, 1837 – December 22, 1899), also known as D. L. Moody, was an American evangelist and publisher connected with Keswickianism, who founded the Moody Church, Northfield School and Mount Hermon School in Massachusetts (now Northfield Mount Hermon School), Moody Bible Institute and Moody Publishers. One of his most famous quotes was “Faith makes all things possible... Love makes all things easy.“ Moody gave up his lucrative boot and shoe business to devote his life to revivalism, working first in the Civil War with Union troops through YMCA in the United States Christian Commission. In Chicago, he built one of the major evangelical centers in the nation, which is still active. Working with singer Ira Sankey, he toured the country and the British Isles, drawing large crowds with a dynamic speaking style. Jesus was a great motivational speaker, and the apostles plus Paul of Tarsus copycatted him to the best of their abilities.
    ellauri092.html on line 67: Over 18 centuries later, Ike Moody broke through all the charts with his charismatic showmanship. Lose your soul to Christ and you find it, with a lot of perks! Moody gave up his lucrative boot business but got millions of followers and a comparable number of bucks on the side I bet. His family founded Moody's and made megabucks. Ei vaitiskaan, eikai ne sentään olleet sukua. Vai oliko? Ei ainakaan veljexiä. Iken perhe on Massachusettsista, Johnin Connecticutista. Galvestonissa on joku dixie Moody dynastia, ja briteissä on 1 jonka äiti oli nimeltään Lingo Lango. Kuulostaa läpältä.
    ellauri092.html on line 78: Dwight Lyman Moody was born into a bankrupt family of nine children with a father who loved whiskey and who died when Dwight was just four. His mother sent them to a school where he learnt very little, and she sent them to the First Congregational Church where he learnt less. His upbringing was something of a disciplined, Puritan-influenced life.
    ellauri092.html on line 80: By 17 years old this stout young Yankee decided to leave his farming work at home and head for Boston where he became a shoe salesman. Like Al Bundy. Taivas on todennäköisesti täynnä kadonneita parittomia sukkia. Ne ovat kaikki pelastuneet sinne. Kun mun sukkaan tulee reikä heitän sen roskiin mutta pelastan parittoman, koska mun lähes kaikki sukat ovat mustia. Vartioin niitä mustasukkaisesti ja teen leskexi jääneistä uusia pareja. He attended a Congregationalist Church which bored him as did all religious matters but over the next year the convicting message of sin and righteousness began to take effect. At the same time though, he raised up a wall of arguments. He settled his heart by deciding to leave the matter until his deathbed, but Cod’s Word continued to disturb him. No wonder: this was good old Boston, the home of the bean and the cod, Where the Lowells talk to the Cabots, And only the Cabots talk to Cod.
    ellauri092.html on line 82: In April 1855 young Edward Kimball a Sunday school teacher was deeply burdened by Moody’s sole. Kimball left his house and made his way to the shoe shop where Moody worked with the intention of confronting Moody about his standing in front of Cod. A thousand contrary thoughts invaded the young man’s mind and he almost turned back. When he realized he had passed the shop he decided he would go for it and get it over with quickly. With what he later thought was a very weak plea with tears in his eyes he challenged Moody concerning his salivation, Cod’s tail and his need of a waist. That day in the back of the shop on his knees Moody accepted his price and Kimball returned home within minutes with new soles. Salivation while you wait.
    ellauri092.html on line 84: The first change in Moody was that he received a burden to see all his family earnings saved. Later that year he moved to Chicago and although he started to show signs of real shoe business ability and success, when he experienced the revival which commenced in that city in January 1857, business success faded into insignificance. He was ruined - success of this world no longer interested him instead, he began to glow in Christian virtue. He mixed freely amongst Plymouth Brethren, Methodist Episcopal, Congregationalists and Baptists. The years passed and he worked with the men in tights at YMCA and raised up one of the most unusual Sunday Schools of that day which became a church. He reluctantly began to preach and haggled every step of the way. He turned down Congregational ordination and remained a simple uneducated layman with a burden for souls. Having heard of Spurgeon’s ministry in London he did all he could to get hold of and read every Spurgeon sermon. He took thorough hold of Spurgeon’s three ‘R’s: Ruin by the fall, Redemption by the Blood, and Regeneration by the Holy Mackerel. This flowed through every one of his messages and was the marrow of Moody’s theology. Many thought him too radical and so nicknamed him ‘Crazy Moody.’
    ellauri092.html on line 86: When his wife Emma suffered bad asthma the doctor suggested a boat trip so Moody decided to take her to dry and airy Britain. In February 1867 they set sail for Britain for the first time. Altogether they had a thoroughly inspiring time. They visited Spurgeon’s Metropolitan Tabernacle which had a congregation of 5,000. He sat amongst the Plymouth Brethren and heard their most fervent preachers as well as preaching for them. He could preach as fervently as any tommy, if not more. He was also invited to speak at some meetings in London where his warmth won everyone’s affection while his wife coughed in the smog. He also visited Bristol to see George Muller’s work where 1,500 orphan children were provided for financially without requests for money. (The trick is familiar from Dickens' Oliver Twist.) Moody was very impressed with what Cod could accomplish going through this meek godly man of prayer. They managed to include Dublin and France in the trip then in June they returned to America.
    ellauri092.html on line 88: He became very settled and successful in ministry in Chicago. He sat on at least ten separate committees while at the same time fighting the gall of Cod to step out as an itinerant Evangelist. Cash flow was becoming mechanical. In June 1871 a great burden came upon two older ladies in his congregation to pray that he would receive the baptism of the Holy Ghost and fire. These two hot ladies became very obvious to Moody as they sat on the front pew and prayed as he preached. When he enquired about their praying they informed him that they needed the power of the Spirit.
    ellauri092.html on line 90: At first Moody could satisfy himself so that was ok. But the persistence of these ladies led him to meet and pray with them. They poured out their hearts asking Cod to fill them with His servant's Spirits. From that day a deep hunger and thirst gripped Moody. By October he was in agony for sole as he prayed and munched Cod for the promised gift. At times he would roll on the floor in agony with the ladies and in tears with this singular prayer to be baptised in the Holy Mackerel grilled with fire. This was a wrestle between his willy and Cod’s willy. It was that very month that Chicago burnt to the ground by ghost fire. All his works, efforts and organizational committees literally went up in a blaze. Shortly after this while passing through New York on his way to Britain the second time Cod heard his prayer. As he walked the streets his willy bent before Cod's, the power of the Golden Horde fell upon him, the Ford drew near and revealed Himself to be His servant. Moody rushed to a friend’s house and asked for rum and to be left alone. Hour after hour he bathed in the presence of Cod as the Holy Mackerels filled him. So strong was this that he cried out to Cod to stay in His hand lest He die. He was filled with the joy of the Gourd. When he left that house it was in the power of the fire, just like Chicago the other day.
    ellauri092.html on line 92: He fleed to England for a few months of rest and with a desire to draw ale with Christian leaders there. He had no intention of zonking although he did a few times but he attended conventions and conferences and wrote numbers of notes and thoughts. He met with the Plymouth Brethren near Dublin and he spent a whole night kneeling in fervent prayer with about 20 of these jealous men. That next morning he walked with Henry “Butcher” Varley through the streets. This Br'er Rabbit said something to him which made a deep impact on the weasel Cod was forming. He said “Moody, the world has yet to see what Cod will do to a man full of It.” That night as these words still reverberated in his mind and heart he vowed that by the grace of Cod and the power of the Holy Mackerels he would be that man. All who met with him during this journey in Britain and Ireland were strangely aware that Cod was preparing a great work in this man. You could smell it a mile away. Mackerels!
    ellauri092.html on line 96: So in June 1873 he arrived again into Liverpool, England, accompanied by his asthmatic wife and song leader Ira Sankey as his other wife. Key men who were leaders and financers who had invited him with the promise of financial help had died since he was last there. There were no meetings, no funds and no committees. What the fuck. It seemed all was lost. Maybe they would just have to return to America? Only one unattractive invitation came from York in the North of England and so there they went. It was hard ground but in the midst of these meetings one unimpressed minister called F.B. Meyer slowly melted and then ignited with holy fervent fire. Our friends fled the scene as fast as they could. Next the Evangelistic foursome moved to Sunderland for several weeks of sole eating meetings where Cod’s power to inflate liver was manifest. In August they brought coals to Newcastle where a daily paper meeting was conducted with some 300 saints in attendance. No other lighting was necessary. News spread throughout the whole land that Creedence Clearvater Revival was coming to churches and salivation to thousands. Other towns were visited in the same manner and left as quickly as the audience caught on that a less inspiring Yankee foursome was doing the song and play.
    ellauri092.html on line 98: Next came the invitation to Edinburgh, Scotland. Only eternity will reveal the results of this revival which started in November, 1873. On the first night at the first meeting 2,000 people had to be turned away because the tiller was already filled to capacity. By now Moody had the full backing and support of many great theologians as well as all national financiers of every occupation. It was later said that “The revival in Edinburgh was like a Holocaust to the land”. Cold Calvinism gave way to fiery evangelism. This great city was startled out of its sleep and stirred to its depths. In the New Year they travelled on to see Crocodile Dundee, Glasgow and elsewhere. This was not successful evangelism, it was Creedence Clearwater Revival live. The nine months in Scotland ended, but the revival burned on a few days. Then things returned to normal.
    ellauri092.html on line 100: In September 1874 they travelled to Belfast in the North of Ireland for five weeks of meetings like those in Scotland. Then onward to Dublin for a month where several thousand pounds sterling were reported converted to dollars. These were some of the most remarkable meetings ever held in Ireland. In November they sailed for England and continued to minister in the main cities and towns. In March 1875 he moved to London to start a 4 mouth campaign. Initially meetings had about 16,000 people in attendance. He bled the rich and poor, the famous and the destitute, princesses as well as paupers. It is estimated that a million and a half people paid him in this chief of cities. After one very brief visit to Cambridge University he returned home to America and did not return again until 1882 when he administered snake oil in Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England.
    ellauri092.html on line 102: In November 1882 when he spoke at Cambridge University he was filled with great anxiety as this educational centre for Britain’s aristocratic and wealthy youth had a reputation of unparalleled riotous behaviour. That first night at a Zoom meeting Moody spoke on ‘the Spirit’s power service.’ The university vicar Handley Moule was somewhat nervous. The young C.T. Studd (the same guy who impressed J.R.Mott with his biceps) greatly doubted ‘if this Yankee was up to the task.’ The first mission night on the Monday had 1,700 students in attendance. As Sankey sang his sacred Hymns they jeered, laughed and shouted. When Sankey finished he was near to tears. As Moody preached on Daniel in the lions den (how appropriate) again they laughed, shouted and did all in their power to disturb him. He maintained his calm. By the end of the week at least 200 students had accepted a check from the speaker. Amongst them was a main ‘ringette player’ who later assumed missionary position in China and was the first lady Bishop of King Kong. Out of this mission came The Cambridge Seven, missionaries who made a lot of dough. This campaign had huge proceeds that also leeched the youth of the whole nation.
    ellauri092.html on line 104: During the summer of 1883 he returned home to count the revenue but was back again; first to Ireland and then London in November. For the next 8 months he held his greatest meetings yet in the capital. Many of his best new labourers were the pervert convicts from 1875. This campaign sealed the future destiny of many young men who would later go to the admission collection field. It was not long after his death in 1899 that his sermons were second only in demand to Pilgrim’s Progress and were printed right across the ad pages of the Boston Globe.
    ellauri092.html on line 106: This however, is a mere summary of a man who showed the world what could be done when a man was fully constipated due to Cod and as practiced as a Late Night Host.
    ellauri092.html on line 112: Seija oli mato kirkkohissassa, täysi kymppi torkassa. Mulla se jäi yhdexikköön kun en välittänyt mennä korottamaan suullisiin. Kirkkohissa oli musta lukuaineista haukotuttavin. Nyze on ruvennut hautakiven katveessa vähän kiinnostamaan.
    ellauri092.html on line 153: Baptists in the South supported slavery "for economic and social reasons", although this was never admitted. Instead, it was claimed that slavery was beneficent, and endorsed in the Bible by God. However, Baptists in the North disagreed strongly, claiming that God would not "condone treating one race as superior to another". Southerners, on the other hand, held that God intended the races to be separate. Finally, around 1835, Southern states began complaining that they were being slighted in the allocation of funds for missionary work.
    ellauri092.html on line 155: The break occurred in 1844, when the Home Mission Society announced that a person could not be simultaneously both a missionary and a slaveowner.[citation needed] Faced with this challenge, the Baptists in the South assembled in May 1845 in Augusta, Georgia, and organized the Southern Baptist Convention, which was pro-slavery. Throughout the remainder of the 19th century and throughout most of the 20th the Southern Baptist Convention continued to protect systemic racism and opposed civil rights for African-Americans, only officially and definitively renouncing slavery and "racial" discrimination with a resolution in 1995.
    ellauri092.html on line 157: In matters of sexuality, several Baptist churches are promoting the virginity pledge to young Baptist Christians, who are invited to engage in a public ceremony at sexual abstinence until Christian marriage. This pact is often symbolized by a purity ring. Programs like True Love Waits, founded in 1993 by the Southern Baptist Convention have been developed to support the commitments.
    ellauri092.html on line 178: Methodism thrived in America thanks to the First and Second Great Awakenings beginning in the 1700s. Various African-American denominations were formed during this period, including the African Methodist Episcopal Church.
    ellauri092.html on line 180: The First Great Awakening was a religious movement among colonials in the 1730s and 1740s. The English Calvinist Methodist preacher George Whitefield played a major role, traveling up and down the colonies and preaching in a dramatic and emotional style, accepting everyone as his audience. It was the largest denomination in 1820.
    ellauri092.html on line 192: Whereas most American Methodist worship is modeled after the Anglican Communion´s Book of Common Prayer, a unique feature was the once practiced observance of the season of Kingdomtide, which encompasses the last thirteen weeks before Advent, thus dividing the long season after Pentecost into two discrete segments. During Kingdomtide, Methodist liturgy emphasizes charitable work and alleviating the suffering of the poor. This practice was last seen in The Book of Worship for Church and Home by The United Methodist Church, 1965, and The Book of Hymns, 1966. While some congregations and their pastors might still follow this old calendar, the Revised Common Lectionary, with its naming and numbering of Days in the Calendar of the Church Year, is used widely. However, congregations who strongly identify with their African American roots and tradition would not usually follow the Revised Common Lectionary.
    ellauri092.html on line 213: Baptists, as their very name implies, adhere to baptism. But not just any baptism – Baptists are more specific on the issue. Baptist subscribe to credo baptism by immersion. That means that they believe in baptism of a confessing believer by immersion into water. They reject pedobaptism and other modes of baptism (sprinkling, pouring, etc.). This is one distinctive that holds true for nearly all Baptist denominations and churches. They are Baptists, after all!
    ellauri092.html on line 219: Methodism also can confidently claim roots that go back centuries; right back to John Wesley, who founded the movement in England, and later in North America. Wesley was unhappy with the “sleepy” faith of the Church of England and sought to bring renewal and revival and spirituality to the practice of Christians. He did this especially through open air preaching, and home meetings which soon formed into societies. By the end of the 18th century, Methodist societies were taking root in the American Colonies, and it soon spread across the continent.
    ellauri092.html on line 223: Many people have wondered, are baptist and methodist the same? The answer is no. However, there are some similarities. Both Baptists and Methodist are trinitarian. Both hold that the Bible is the central text in faith and practice (though groups within both the families of denominations would dispute the Bible’s authority). Both Baptists and Methodists have historically affirmed the divinity of Christ, justification by faith alone, and the reality of heaven for those who die in Christ, and eternal torment in hell for those who die unbelieving.
    ellauri092.html on line 233: In contrast, Methodists are mostly hierarchical. Churches are led by conferences with increasing levels of authority. This begins at the local level, with a Local Church Conference, and progresses upward to a denomination-wide General Conference (or some variation of these categories, depending on the specific Methodist group). Most major Methodist denominations own the property of local churches and have a decisive say in assigning pastors to local churches.
    ellauri092.html on line 237: Baptists make this decision entirely at the local level. Local churches usually form search committees, invite and screen applicants, and then select one candidate to present to the church for vote. There are no denomination-wide standards for ordination in many larger Baptist denominations (such as the Southern Baptist Convention) or minimum education requirements for pastors, though most Baptist churches only hire pastors trained at the seminary level.
    ellauri092.html on line 253: Baptists are traditionally mixed on the Calvinism-Arminianism debate. Few would call themselves true Arminians, and most Baptists would probably self-describe as modified (or moderate) Calvinists – or 4 point Calvinists, rejecting especially the doctrine of Limited Atonement. In contrast to Methodists, most all Baptists believe in the eternal security of a Christian, though many hold to a view of this that is very different from the Reformed doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints.
    ellauri092.html on line 269: In 1859 William Boardman published his book, The Higher Christian Life. The book ultimately birthed the Keswick Movement, so named because the first meeting was held in a church in Keswick, England. The Keswick Movement was filled with doctrinal error from the start and like nearly all errors that infiltrated Christendom over the centuries, they remain to this day. This shouldn’t surprise us because Satan has always twisted God’s Word to his own ends.
    ellauri092.html on line 271: William Boardman worked closely with Robert Pearsall Smith, whose wife Hannah Whitall Smith, a Quaker, became well known in the movement for her belief in “quietism”. Quietism teaches that “sinless perfection” is attainable in this life and comes from inner quietness or meditative contemplation that is believed to allow God to work as all human effort ceases. Remind you of something today?
    ellauri092.html on line 273: Those involved with the Keswick Movement were continuationists otherwise known as anti-cessationists. These folks then (as well as today), believed the sign gifts including tongues never stopped. History as well as Scripture tells us that this is not true; that in fact, the sign gifts did actually cease not long after the last apostle died and the Bible had finished being written (though not yet compiled into Canon).
    ellauri092.html on line 275: Though Boardman was a Presbyterian and strongly influenced by the numerous heresies of Charles Finney and others, he was not a trained theologian. In fact, it is tragic that many errors that crept into the church were introduced by people who had little to no training in rightly dividing the Word. This is not to say that a person with little to no formal training cannot be used by God or that he is exempt from learning the truth of Scripture (Harry Ironsides is a good example). However, there is a proper hermeneutic to be used in studying Scripture and if not applied, many errors can result.
    ellauri092.html on line 277: The Keswick Movement urged Christians to seek enlightenment emotionally, to press on toward a higher (“mystical”), experience in Christ. This type of pursuit is diametrically opposed to what God teaches in His Word (2 Timothy 3:16-17). As such, it should be rejected. It is the exact same way Satan tempted Eve to focus on how she felt instead of what God had said (Genesis 3).
    ellauri092.html on line 285: One of the main errors within the Keswick Movement is their unbiblical view of sanctification. Keswickians believe when a person becomes saved, they are immediately justified. This is certainly Scriptural fact (Romans 3:21-26; 5:18-19; 2 Corinthians 5:21). There is nothing I can do to justify myself before God. Only salvation provides this immediate and eternal justification as Christ’s righteousness is literally imputed to my account.
    ellauri092.html on line 287: Biblically speaking, sanctification is the process the Christian goes through that ultimately makes him/her perfect in Christ. This is not only begun by God at our conversion, but finished by Him as well when we reach the eternal realm (Hebrews 12:2; Philippians 1:6). In sanctification, Christians are both passive and active. We are passively trusting in God’s ability to fully sanctify us and we are active because we are to choose to do what is right, in thought, word, and deed (Romans 12:1-2; 1 Thessalonians 4:4; Hebrews 12:14, etc).
    ellauri092.html on line 289: Adherents of Keswickianism would agree with the above regarding justification. However, when it comes to sanctification, they move off in a different direction. They generally do not believe the Holy Mackerel comes into the person and takes up residence at salvation, but that the Holy Mackerel simply comes upon the person to seal them with salvation. It is later, at a time they refer to variously as the “second blessing,” or “higher living,” when they say sanctification occurs. Ultimately, their view of sanctification is flat out mysticism akin to New Age’s goal of an altered state of consciousness. This is all based on a strong (and seemingly biblical), desire to emotionally “know” God. The person turns inward to meet the felt needs of self.
    ellauri092.html on line 297: But who in history have been associated with Keswick due to agreement with it? Here are just some of the more well known people below
    ellauri092.html on line 320: The concept of holiness is a biblical one. It is something that all Christians should know about and understand how we connect with it. Thomas Constable has this to say about holiness.
    ellauri092.html on line 322: Holiness is thus not so much an abstract or mystic idea, as a regulative principle in the everyday lives of men and women. Holiness is thus attained not by flight from the world, nor by monk-like renunciation of human relationships of family or station, but by the spirit in which we fulfill the obligations of life in its simplest and commonest details: in this way – by doing justly, loving mercy, and walking humbly with our God in everyday life.
    ellauri092.html on line 324: The emphasis of Keswick is that you are never holy enough. Certainly, this is true. However, I am on the path to greater holiness as God recreates within me the perfect character of His Son, which will not be completed until I reach eternity. This is God’s work of sanctification.
    ellauri092.html on line 326: The common thread with all of the people above (and others not listed), is the emphasis on mystical experiences that allegedly begin within as we quiet ourselves and wait upon God. Unfortunately, this is clearly not Scriptural because we are not to focus on our “innerspace” as New Agers do. We are to put our hand to the plow and look forward, not backward. This can only occur as we submit ourselves to Him (Romans 12:1-2). It really doesn’t matter if our emotions catch up with us, nor should they be used to “verify” that we are growing in the Lord. If the heart is deceitfully wicked and cannot be understood (Jeremiah 17:9), what makes us think that once we are saved, our hearts are all of a sudden able to be known?
    ellauri092.html on line 330: Andrew Murray, A W Tozer and others now make perfect sense to me when I read their books. They were mystics who sought, focused on and tended to emphasize an emotional experience they believed was holiness. I understand that mistake because I also desperately reached for that for several years. It doesn’t work and causes the Christian to constantly look to his/her emotions for verification.
    ellauri092.html on line 338: So it is I understand the desire to know God more than we do now, but this largely will not occur until after we leave this life and see Him face to face. Christians are to grow through imitating God in the area of holiness, which means separating ourselves from the things that offend God. This requires purpose on our part and the Holy Mackerel is within us to empower us to do that. Sometimes, it simply requires a resounding “NO!” to the temptation.
    ellauri092.html on line 340: Too many leaders and authors are tempting Christians to go “beyond,” obtaining “more” than the Bible says we have a right to expect. There is no “second blessing” for the Christian, unless you consider the life after this one the actual second blessing when we will be separated from our sin nature forever, we will see Him as He is and we will be like Him. Then we will know in certainty as we are known.
    ellauri092.html on line 427: Crumbling buildings, unique people, right up against the Mississippi River flood plain with a giant wall; this was the weirdest place I’d ever been in America. Precisely every third house was burned to the ground on one street, everyone standing on both sides of another street was a dwarf, a clerk looked like a zombie. Most American cities have odd scenery. Luxora had that and weird people as well!
    ellauri092.html on line 452: Kaarle Krohn tuli tunnetuksi suomalaisen kansanrunoustieteellisen metodin, ns. historiallis-maantieteellisen metodin, kehittäjänä. Metodilla pyritään selvittämään runon, myytin, legendan tai sadun varhaisvaiheita, kulkeutumista ja muuntumista. Metodi perustui saman runon tai sadun eri toisintojen vertailuun. Analysoimalla toisintojen maantieteellistä levinneisyyttä Krohn pyrki rekonstruoimaan runon eri aikoina esiintyneet versiot todennäköistä alkuversiota myöten. Julius arveli että Kalevala oli tullut lännestä, mahdollisesti Yhdysvalloista. Juoni on hyvin samantapainen kuin Game of Thronesissa.
    ellauri092.html on line 454: Metodin kehitti alun perin Kaarle Krohnin isä, Helsingin yliopiston partapozo yleisen kielitieteen professori Julius Krohn. Kaarle Krohn jatkoi isänsä työtä ja teki metodista kansainvälisesti tunnetun. Sitä kutsutaan nykyään paitsi maantieteellis-historialliseksi metodiksi, myös suomalaiseksi tutkimusmenetelmäksi (The Finnish Research Method). Metodia pidetään folkloristiikan ensimmäisenä tieteellisenä menetelmänä.
    ellauri092.html on line 463: Kurki-Suonion harrastukset suuntautuivat musiikkiin, hymnologiaan (hän tutki virsitekstejä ja sävelmiä), historiaan, raittius- ja heimoasiaan. Ja kai naisasiaan, kerze oli naispappeuskomitean jäsen? No ei: Tunnustuksellisen ja raamatullisen näkökannan puheenvuoroja sisältävät prof. Heikki Koskenniemen kirjanen ”Vedenjakajalla naispappeuskysymyksessä”, v:n 1958 kirkolliskokouksen asettaman komitean mietinnön 2. eriävä mielipide, jonka on esittänyt teol. tri Erkki Kurki-Suonio.
    ellauri093.html on line 75: And this is not our fate
    ellauri093.html on line 124: Taylor was born on 21 May 1832 the son of a chemist (pharmacist) and Methodist lay preacher James Taylor and his wife, Amelia (Hudson), but as a young man he ran away from the Christian beliefs of his parents. At 17, after reading an evangelistic tract pamphlet entitled "Poor Richard", he professed faith in Christ, and in December 1849, he committed himself to going to China as a missionary. Vaihtoi metodia. Sen guru Cronin oli Plymouthin Brethreneitä.
    ellauri093.html on line 126: Having been accepted as missionaries by Hudson Taylor of the China Inland Mission the seven were scheduled to leave for China in early February 1885. Before leaving the seven held a farewell tour to spread the message across the country – it was during this tour that someone dubbed them "The Cambridge Seven."
    ellauri093.html on line 132: Though their time together was brief, they helped catapult the China Inland Mission from obscurity to "almost embarrassing prominence", and their work helped to inspire many recruits for the CIM and other mission societies. In 1885, when the Seven first arrived in China, the CIM had 163 missionaries; this had doubled by 1890 and reached some 800 by 1900, which represented one-third of the entire Protestant missionary force.
    ellauri093.html on line 140: This list consists of mostly nineteenth-century figures who were associated with the Brethren movement before the 1848 schism. They are the leading historical figures common to both the Open and Exclusive Brethren.
    ellauri093.html on line 174: Major General Orde Charles Wingate, DSO & Two Bars (26 February 1903 – 24 March 1944) was a senior British Army officer, known for his creation of the Chindit deep-penetration missions in Japanese-held territory during the Burma Campaign of the Second World War.
    ellauri093.html on line 176: Wingate was an exponent of unconventional military thinking and the value of surprise tactics. Assigned to Mandatory Palestine, he became a supporter of Zionism, and set up a joint British-Jewish counter-insurgency unit. Under the patronage of the area commander Archibald Wavell, Wingate was given increasing latitude to put his ideas into practice during the Second World War. He created units in Abyssinia and Burma.
    ellauri093.html on line 180: Wingate was killed in an aircraft accident late in the war. The casualty rate the Chindits suffered, especially from disease, is a continuing controversy. Wingate believed that resistance to infection could be improved by inculcating a tough mental attitude, but medical officers considered his methods unsuited to a tropical environment.
    ellauri093.html on line 182: Wingate was known for various eccentricities. For instance, he often wore an alarm clock around his wrist, which would go off at times, and had raw onions and garlic on a string around his neck, which he would occasionally bite into as a snack (the reason he used to give for this was to ward off mosquitoes). He often went about without clothing. In Palestine, recruits were used to having him come out of the shower to give them orders, wearing nothing but a shower cap, and continuing to scrub himself with a shower brush. Sometimes Wingate would eat only grapes and onions.
    ellauri093.html on line 184: Lord Moran, Winston Churchill's personal physician, wrote in his diaries that "[Wingate] seemed to me hardly sane – in medical jargon a borderline case." Likewise, referring to Churchill's meeting with Wingate in Quebec, Max Hastings wrote that, "Wingate proved a short-lived protégé: closer acquaintance caused Churchill to realise that he was too mad for high command."
    ellauri093.html on line 191: Both Open and Exclusive Brethren have historically been known as "Plymouth Brethren." That is still largely the case in some areas, such as North America and Northern Ireland. In some other parts of the world such as Australia and New Zealand, most Open Brethren shun the "Plymouth" label. This is mostly because of widespread negative media coverage of the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, the most hardline branch of the Exclusive Brethren (and the only numerically significant Exclusive group in either country), which most Open Brethren consider to be a cult with which they do not wish to be misidentified.
    ellauri093.html on line 193: Terminology which sometimes confuses Brethren and non-Brethren alike is the distinction between the Open assemblies, usually called "Chapels", and the Closed assemblies (non-Exclusive), called "Gospel Halls." Contrary to common misconceptions, those traditionally known as the "Closed Brethren" are not a part of the Exclusive Brethren, but are rather a very conservative subset of the Open Brethren. The Gospel Halls regard reception to the assembly as a serious matter. One is not received to the Lord's Supper but to the fellowship of the assembly. This is important because the Lord's Supper is for believers, not unbelievers.
    ellauri093.html on line 199: Henry K. Carroll performed an analysis of United States census data in 1912 to assign Roman numerals to various Brethren groups. For example, Brethren III is also known as the Lowe Brethren and the Elberfeld Brethren. Carroll's initial findings listed four sub-groups, identified as Brethren I-IV, but he expanded the number six and then to eight; Arthur Carl Piepkorn expanded the number to ten. Those who have attempted to trace the realignments of the Plymouth Brethren include Ian McDowell and Massimo Introvigne. The complexity of the Brethren's history is evident in charts by McDowell and Ian McKay.
    ellauri093.html on line 201: Brethren assemblies (as their gatherings are most often called; everybody is supposed to speak in assembly languages) are divided into the Open Brethren and the Exclusive Brethren, following a schism that took place in 1848. Both of these main branches are themselves divided into several smaller branches, with varying degrees of communication and overlap among them. (The general category "Exclusive Brethren" has been confused in the media with a much smaller group known as the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church (PBCC) or the Raven-Taylor-Hales Brethren, numbering only around 40,000 worldwide.)
    ellauri093.html on line 226: This guide covers the following topics: What is eider abuse? What are the types of eider abuse? What is the age at which someone older is considered an ‘eider’? Why does eider abuse occur? Who commits eider abuse? Who are the abusers? Who is at risk of eider abuse? Is it eider abuse if the person neglects their own needs? Is eider abuse family violence? As a family violence worker, what do I need to know about eider abuse?
    ellauri093.html on line 249: Abuse of eider by someone who is not part of a frustrating relationship, such as workers and business owners, does not fall under the definition of ‘eider abuse’ used in this Tool Kit. For help with consumer-based abuse such as scams and rip offs contact Consumer Affairs (ask for "Victoria").
    ellauri093.html on line 258: Financial abuse: Using someone’s money, property or other assets illegally or improperly or forcing someone to change their will or sign documents. This is the most common form of abuse seen at Seniors Rights Victoria.
    ellauri093.html on line 262: Social abuse: Forcing someone to become isolated by restricting their access to others including family, friends or services. This can be used to prevent others from finding out about the abuse.
    ellauri093.html on line 286: Self neglect includes behaviour such as poor hygiene, excessive quacking and compulsive hoarding. Older people have the right to make their own lifestyle choices, even if those choices put them at risk of harm. Scrooge McDuck has a license for his money bin, though it exposes him to the Beagle Boys.
    ellauri093.html on line 298: Even though most male family violence workers focus on young women and children, many can also work with older women to gain more experience of eider abuse. Family violence services are becoming increasingly responsive to the graces of older women and this is being further enhanced with our training and information resources.
    ellauri093.html on line 304: She removed Stranleigh’s coat with a dexterity that aroused his imagination. The eider woman returned with skimpy dressings and a sponge, which she placed on a chair. Carry your head along as your eiders have done. After being a member of the Church for a while, Bill was ordained to the office of an eider. Jack had been an eider for only a few days when he received a new calling whistle. The eiders are coming over for dinner tonight. One of the long-time leaders in the Church is Eider Pennypacker.
    ellauri093.html on line 317: The Open Brethren believe in a plurality of eiders (Acts 14:23; 15:6,23; 20:17; Philippians 1:1), men meeting the Biblical qualifications found in 1 Timothy 3:1–7 and Titus 1:6–9. This position is also taken in some Baptist churches, especially Reformed Baptists, and by the Churches of Christ. It is understood that eiders are appointed by the Holy Spirit (Acts 20:28) and are recognised as meeting the qualifications by the assembly and by previously existing eiders. Generally, the eiders themselves will look out for men who meet the biblical qualifications, and invite them to join them as eiders. In some Open assemblies, eiders are elected democratically, but this is a fairly recent development and is still relatively uncommon.
    ellauri093.html on line 321: The term "Eider" is based on the same Scriptures that are used to identify "Bishops" and "Overseers" in other Christian circles, and some Exclusive Brethren claim that the system of recognition of eiders by the assembly means that the Open Brethren cannot claim full adherence to the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers.[27] Open Brethren consider, however, that this reveals a mistaken understanding of the priesthood of all believers which, in the Assemblies, has to do with the ability to directly offer worship to God and His Christ at the Lord's Supper, whether silently or audibly, without any human mediator being necessary—which is in accordance with 1 Timothy 2:5, where it is stated that Christ Jesus Himself is the sole Mediator between God and men ("men" being used here generically of mankind, and not referring simply and solely to "males").
    ellauri093.html on line 323: The Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, the most hardline of all the Exclusive Brethren groups, has developed into a de facto hierarchical body which operates under the headship of an Elect Vessel, currently Bruce Hales of Australia. Some defectors have accused him and his predecessors of having quasi-papal authority. This development is almost universally considered by other streams of the Plymouth Brethren movement, however, as a radical departure from Brethren principles.
    ellauri093.html on line 329: Although this title is not found among the more traditional of those applied to our Lady, the word vessel, 'Sacred" vessel of all mysteries', 'Vessel of honour', 'Spiritual vessel', 'Singular vessel of devotion', appears in both ancient and more recent devotional expression, for example in the Litany of Loreto. Heikompi astia. Eräänlainen suppilo tai pullo. Our Father…Hail Mary… and Glory Be…
    ellauri093.html on line 351: Hiljan äidin porukoilla oli mökki Lahden lähellä Vesijärvellä. Joxeenkin rauhismainen ilmeisesti. Nimikin oli Rauhaniemi. Siellä oli pyöreitä asteri- ja bellispenkkejä, ja sieviä pöytäryhmiä kahvitarjoilua varten. Mäntymezä oli perattu puistomaisexi ja aidattu piikkilangalla jotta naapurit pysyisivät loitolla. Marjapensaita ja keittiökasvimaita oli ennestään, ja suuri alue varattiin puutarhamansikoille. Saku pantiin pumppaamaan vesi järvestä kaivonrenkaisiin josta se valutettiin istutuxille.
    ellauri093.html on line 449: In this respect all religions are only one religion. Tästä seuraa että kaikki uskonnot on oikeasti ihan 1 ja sama.
    ellauri093.html on line 458: Rasmus Nielsen (1809–1884) was a Danish philosopher and professor, as well as a critic of Søren Kierkegaard. In his books, Søren's Nielsen ratings hit an all-time low. Nielsen was the son of a farmer. He studied theology before Darwin's Time. He succeeded Poul Martin Møller as professor of moral theology.
    ellauri093.html on line 461: Se vastaa kiukkuisella puolinelsonin niskaotteella 1868 Nielsenin skriftiin "Hr. Professor Brøchners Philosophiske Kritik, gjennemseet af R. Nielsen.".
    ellauri093.html on line 654: Sielunhoito järjestettiin kimppakivan muodossa. Vuohet ja lampaat paritettiin keskenään ja pantiin parit yhteen leikkimään kahden hengen piilosta jossa kukaan ei ole "se". Tuntui kuin kaikkialta olisi kuulunut: tuku tuku lampaitani, pikko pikko pikkojani, mää eiku mää, let me sit on it, no let me sit on it, ok let's both sit on it. This I gotta see! (Dick) Mun pari oli maitokaupan myyjåtär joka oli raskaan synnin pauloissa. Herran sormi auttoi, en uskalla sanoa enempää.
    ellauri093.html on line 668: Opettajiin olen ollut kiintynyt lapsuudesta asti. Past. Dolmenista tuli mulle enemmän kuin kristiveli, enemmänkin kristikundikaveri. Olimme kahdenkesken. Liikutuxen vallassa pyysin: anna mulle siunaus! Mä polvistuin, ja hän (krhm) antoi siunauxen. Veljeni kertoo että pakanamaassa kastettu neekeri aivan erityisellä rakkaudella kiintyy kastelijaansa. Enhän minä pakana ollut eikä Dick mua ihan uppokastellut, mutta sinä hetkenä hän kyllä hyvin läheisesti liittyi minuun. Mutta Mott oli sittenkin mun elämäni miehistä paras, sen messiin mä olisin kyllä lähtenyt jos se olis pyytänyt. Muttei pyytänyt. Dick Dolmenin en milloinkaan. Ei sekään kyllä pyytänyt.
    ellauri093.html on line 907: The Jewish form of worship is well worthy of the study of Christian theologians. It is not the object of this book. It contains only simple heart-to-heart talks to God's children about our precious Redeemer and how we can follow and serve Him best in our daily lives.
    ellauri093.html on line 909: The above words came fresh in my mind in writing. They were often used by my beloved father, when he led his children to the throne of grace in family worship. If they find an echo in the hearts of the readers I shall be deeply thankful.
    ellauri094.html on line 41:
    Todellinen yllätys yliopistolla: liito-orava kipusi kolmanteen kerroxeen ilman hissiä.

    ellauri094.html on line 46: P.S. Hyvä tiedelehden toimitus! Pyytäisin että Jukka Ruukki vapautettaisiin Tiede-lehden päätomittajan paikalta esteettisistä syistä. Hän näyttää mielestäni nahistuneelta kyrvänpäältä ja hänen luonnonvarakeskustalaiset mielipiteensä ovat perseestä.
    ellauri094.html on line 94: Syreeni suggests that the letters of John - written after the predecessor gospels but before the final edition - reveal a schism in the Johannine community that was caused by the majority faction's acceptance of Jesus' death and resurrection, as it was then recorded in the new gospel. By exploring the gospel's different means of legitimizing the passion story, such as the creation of the 'Beloved Disciple' to witness Jesus' passion, and the foreshadowing of the resurrection of Jesus in the miracle of Lazarus, Syreeni provides a bold and provocative case for a new understanding of John.
    ellauri094.html on line 136: Siinä mielessä itse nyt olen jopa ajatellut sellaista lähestymistapaa, kun esimerkiksi idässä ja monessa muussa valtiossa, Keski-Euroopan valtioissa, vaikkapa Kreikassa ja muualla, avioliiton merkkinä sormus on oikeassa nimettömässä — tämä on myös ortodoksisen kirkkokunnan tapa osoittaa avioliittoa — että itseni osalta aion tehdä niin, että 1.3., kun tämä tuhkakeskiviikko ja 40 päivän paastoaika alkaa, tulen siirtämään sormuksen oikeaan nimettömään ja pidän sitä siellä ainakin sen 40 päivän ajan, ja luotan vielä siihen, että tähän asiaan tulee uusi näkökulma. Tuhkakeskiviikko tulee olemaan merkkipaalu Suomen historiassa ajasta, jolloin yhteiskuntana käänsimme selkämme kristilliselle moraaliarvolle ja Jumalan tahdolle tältä osin. En epäile lainkaan, etteivätkö seurakunnat huomioi tuhkakeskiviikon sanomaa ja rukoile maamme tilanteen puolesta.
    ellauri094.html on line 174: Eli nämä molemmat lausumaesitykset ovat mielestäni hyvinkin kannatettavia. Kannatankin näitä esityksiä nimenomaan länsimaisten perusoikeuksien historian näkökulmasta käsin tarkasteltuna.
    ellauri094.html on line 205: The Babylonian captivity or Babylonian exile is the period in Jewish history during which a number of people from the ancient Kingdom of Judah were captives in Babylon, the capital of the Neo-Babylonian Empire.
    ellauri094.html on line 207: After the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BCE, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon besieged Jerusalem, resulting in tribute being paid by King Jehoiakim, aka Joakim von Anka. Jehoiakim refused to pay tribute in Nebuchadnezzar's fourth year, which led to another siege in Nebuchadnezzar's seventh year, culminating with the death of Jehoiakim and the exile to Babylonia of King Jeconiah, his court and many others; Jeconiah's successor Zedekiah and others were exiled in Nebuchadnezzar's 18th year; a later deportation occurred in Nebuchadnezzar's 23rd year. The dates, numbers of deportations, and numbers of deportees given in the biblical accounts vary. These deportations are dated to 597 BCE for the first, with others dated at 587/586 BCE, and 582/581 BCE respectively.
    ellauri094.html on line 209: After the fall of Babylon to the Persian king Cyrus the Great in 539 BCE, exiled Judeans were permitted to return to Judah. According to the biblical book of Ezra, construction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem began around 537 BCE. All these events are considered significant in Jewish history and culture, and had a far-reaching impact on the development of Judaism.
    ellauri094.html on line 213: Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem, his capture of King Jeconiah, his appointment of Zedekiah in his place, and the plundering of the city in 597 BCE are corroborated by a passage in the Babylonian Chronicles, p.293.
    ellauri094.html on line 215: In the seventh year, in the month of Kislev, the king of Akkad mustered his troops, marched to the Hatti-vatti-land, and encamped against the City of Judah and on the ninth day of the month of Adar he seized the city and captured the king. He appointed there a king of his own choice and taking heavy tribute brought it back to Babylon.
    ellauri094.html on line 217: Jehoiachin's Iron Rations Tablets, describing ration orders for a captive King of Judah, identified with King Jeconiah, have been discovered during excavations in Babylon, in the royal archives of Nebuchadnezzar. One of the tablets refers to food rations for "Ya’u-kīnu, king of the land of Yahudu" and five royal princes, his sons.
    ellauri094.html on line 219: Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonian forces returned in 588/586 BCE and rampaged through Judah, leaving clear archaeological evidence of destruction in many towns and settlements there. Clay ostraca from this period, referred to as the Lachish letters, were discovered during excavations; one, which was probably written to the commander at Lachish from an outlying base, describes how the signal fires from nearby towns were disappearing: "And may (my lord) be apprised that we are watching for the fire signals of Lachish according to all the signs which my lord has given, because we cannot see Azeqah." Archaeological finds from Jerusalem testify that virtually the whole city within the walls was burnt to rubble in 587 BCE and utterly destroyed.
    ellauri094.html on line 221: Archaeological excavations and surveys have enabled the population of Judah before the Babylonian destruction to be calculated with a high degree of confidence to have been approximately 75,000. Taking the different biblical numbers of exiles at their highest, 20,000, this would mean that only about the fattest 25% of the population had been deported to Babylon, with the remaining 75% of havenots staying in Judah. Although Jerusalem was destroyed and depopulated, with large parts of the city remaining in ruins for 150 years, numerous other settlements in Judah continued to be inhabited, with no signs of disruption visible in archaeological studies.
    ellauri094.html on line 229: The exilic period was a rich one for Hebrew literature. Biblical depictions of the exile include Book of Jeremiah 39–43 (which saw the exile as a lost opportunity); the final section of 2 Kings (which portrays it as the temporary end of history); 2 Chronicles (in which the exile is the "Sabbath of the land"); and the opening chapters of Ezra, which records its end. Other works from or about the exile include the stories in Daniel 1–6, Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, the "Story of the Three Youths" (1 Esdras 3:1–5:6), and the books of Tobit and Book of Judith. The Book of Lamentations arose from the Babylonian captivity. The final redaction of the Pentateuch took place in the Persian period following the exile,:310and the Priestly source, one of its main sources, is primarily a product of the post-exilic period when the former Kingdom of Judah had become the Persian province of Yehud.
    ellauri094.html on line 231: In the Hebrew Bible, the captivity in Babylon is presented as a punishment for idolatry and disobedience to Yahweh in a similar way to the presentation of Israelite slavery in Egypt followed by deliverance. The Babylonian Captivity had a number of serious effects on Judaism and Jewish culture. For example, the current Hebrew alphabet was adopted during this period, replacing the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet.
    ellauri094.html on line 233: This period saw the last high point of biblical prophecy in the person of Ezekiel, followed by the emergence of the central role of the Torah in Jewish life. According to many historical-critical scholars, the Torah was redacted during this time, and began to be regarded as the authoritative text for Jews. This period saw their transformation into an ethno-religious group who could survive without a central Temple. Israeli philosopher and Biblical scholar Yehezkel Kaufmann said “The exile is the watershed. With the exile, the religion of Israel comes to an end and Judaism begins.”
    ellauri094.html on line 235: This process coincided with the emergence of scribes and sages as Jewish leaders (see Ezra). Prior to exile, the people of Israel had been organized according to tribe. Afterwards, they were organized by smaller family groups. Only the tribe of Levi continued in its temple role after the return. After this time, there were always sizable numbers of Jews living outside Eretz Israel; thus, it also marks the beginning of the "Jewish diaspora", unless this is considered to have begun with the Assyrian captivity of Israel.
    ellauri094.html on line 318: God has a funny way of treating his “chosen people.” Apparently, the Jews were misbehaving and being ungodly. After several years of some other shenanigans in Babylon, god decided it was time to put his foot down and end the free will of the king by having him take the Jewish people captive. This was in ca. 597 BCE. First I’d like to ask the following questions: Shouldn’t god have known that his “chosen people” were going to act like brats? Couldn’t he have chosen a better, more well-behaved group of people to whom to deliver his word? Anyway, moving on.
    ellauri094.html on line 344: “For thus says the Lord, ‘When seventy years have been completed for Babylon, I will visit you and fulfill My good word to you, to bring you back to this place.” (Jeremiah 29:10)
    ellauri094.html on line 354: One should be skeptical of whether this is a Bible contradiction given the Skeptic Annotated Bible’s track record of inaccurately handling the Bible. See the many examples of their error which we have responded to in this post: Collection of Posts Responding to Bible Contradictions. Of course that does not take away the need to respond to this claim of a contradiction, which is what the remainder of this post will do. But this observation should caution us to slow down and look more closely at the passages cited by the Skeptic Annotated Bible to see if they interpreted the passages properly to support their conclusion that it is a Bible contradiction.
    ellauri094.html on line 363: Nor was this quoted anywhere in the New Testament (Sean Adams, Baruch and the Epistle of Jeremiah, 18).
    ellauri094.html on line 370: However we do see elsewhere in the Bible it affirm Jeremiah 29:10’s claim that “The Babylonian Captivity was seventy years.” Jeremiah 25:11 states “This whole land will be a desolation and a horror, and these nations will serve the king of Babylon seventy years.” See also Jeremiah 25:12.
    ellauri094.html on line 372: Also the expectation was seventy years for the exiles to return since one sees this interpretation lead Daniel to eagerly long for the seventy year milestone as seen in Daniel 9:2.
    ellauri094.html on line 373: One of the reason to doubt Baruch 6:2 is actually written by Jeremiah and to believe it was written much later is that the Book of Jeremiah talks about the remnant will begin returning within 70 years and yet Baruch 6:2 state the return will be within 7 generations which seems to excuse those who were Jewish reading this book that never did went back to Jerusalem for many generations but continued living outside Jerusalem. Fascinating as well is the fact that this book was written in Greek and not in Hebrew which indicate the likely audience was the Jewish Diaspora.
    ellauri094.html on line 378: We shouldn’t miss that worldviews are at play even with the skeptic’s objection to Christianity. The worldview of the author of the Skeptic Annotated Bible actually doesn’t even allow for such a thing as the law of non-contradiction to be meaningful and intelligible. In other words for him to try to disprove the Bible by pointing out that there’s a Bible contradiction doesn’t even make sense within his own worldview. Check out our post “Skeptic Annotated Bible Author’s Self-Defeating Worldview.” Read also Stanford's bit on contradictory beliefs here. Lisää aiheesta:
    ellauri094.html on line 583: Strength like his own. Silti kovaa kuin huutotorvesta:
    ellauri094.html on line 610: "Unto each man his handiwork, unto each his crown, Joka miehellä oma nyrkkikyllikki, oma nuppi,
    ellauri094.html on line 612: Whoso takes the world's life on him and his own lays down, Se joka ottaa maailmasta vauhtia ja panee parastaan,
    ellauri094.html on line 621: Upon his head; Panna päihin sille;
    ellauri094.html on line 622: He has bought his eternity with a little hour, Se on ostanut ikuisuuden omalla neljännestunnilla,
    ellauri094.html on line 654: The body of Algernon Charles Swinburne’s poetry is so vast and varied that it is difficult to generalize about it. Swinburne wrote poetry for more than sixty years, and in that time he treated an enormous variety of subjects and employed many poetic forms and meters. He wrote English and Italian sonnets, elegies, odes, lyrics, dramatic monologues, ballads, and romances; and he experimented with the rondeau, the ballade, and the sestina. Much of this poetry is marked by a strong lyricism and a self-conscious, formal use of such rhetorical devices as alliteration, assonance, repetition, personification, and synecdoche. Swinburne’s brilliant self-parody, “Nephilidia,” hardly exaggerates the excessive rhetoric of some of his earlier poems. The early A Song of Italy would have more effectively conveyed its extreme republican sentiments had it been more restrained. As it is, content is too often lost in verbiage, leading a reviewer for The Athenaeum to remark that “hardly any literary bantling has been shrouded in a thicker veil of indefinite phrases.” A favorite technique of Swinburne is to reiterate a poem’s theme in a profusion of changing images until a clear line of development is lost. “The Triumph of Time” is an example. Here the stanzas can be rearranged without loss of effect. This poem does not so much develop as accrete. Clearly a large part of its greatness rests in its music. As much as any other poet, Swinburne needs to be read aloud. The diffuse lyricism of Swinburne is the opposite of the closely knit structures of John Donne and is akin to the poetry of Walt Whitman.
    ellauri094.html on line 658: “Super Flumina Babylonis” celebrates the release of Italy from bondage in imagery that recalls the resurrection of Christ. The open tomb, the folded graveclothes, the “deathless face” all figure in this interesting poem that sings out, “Death only dies.” In “Quia Multum Amavit,” France, shackled by tyranny, is personified as a harlot who has been false to liberty. She has become “A ruin where satyrs dance/ A garden wasted for beasts to crawl and brawl in.” The poem ends with France prostrate before the spirit of Freedom, who speaks to her as Christ spoke to the sinful woman in the Pharisee’s house, in a tone of forgiveness.
    ellauri094.html on line 690: and, with, ye, to, by, of, in, thy, you, his, him, for, nor, so are repeated.
    ellauri094.html on line 706: history of its creation;
    ellauri094.html on line 729: So in your view of Christianity, let me get this straight, you honestly believe that God wants you to kill the Jihadists? Am I understanding you right?
    ellauri094.html on line 743: And as I’ve already stated, atheists are responsible for the greatest mass murders in history.
    ellauri094.html on line 809: The bible is a fallible human’s interpretation of God/history/etc. Christians who claim it to be infallible seem to crave something in religion that doesn’t exist in mainstream Christianity: authority. Seems to me, they lack something or someone authoritative like the Catholic Pope or the Mormon Prophet who claims to be God’s spokesman. Since mainstream Christianity lacks an authoritative claim, they nonsensically claim “the word of God” to be their powerful lightning rod.
    ellauri095.html on line 37: Sprung rhythm is a poetic rhythm designed to imitate the rhythm of natural speech. It is constructed from feet in which the first syllable is stressed and may be followed by a variable number of unstressed syllables. The British poet Gerard Manley Hopkins said he discovered this previously unnamed poetic rhythm in the natural patterns of English in folk songs, spoken poetry, Shakespeare, Milton, et al. He used diacritical marks on syllables to indicate which should be stressed in cases "where the reader might be in doubt which syllable should have the stress" (acute, e.g. shéer) and which syllables should be pronounced but not stressed (grave, e.g., gleanèd).
    ellauri095.html on line 49: Hopkins was influenced by the Welsh language, which he had acquired while studying theology at St Beuno's near St Asap. The poetic forms of Welsh literature and particularly cynghanedd, with its emphasis on repeating sounds, accorded with his own style and became a prominent feature of his work. This reliance on similar-sounding words with close or differing senses means that his poems are best understood if read aloud.
    ellauri095.html on line 51: Hopkins’s most famous Welsh sonnet, “The Windhover,” reveals that for him this Book of Nature, like the Bible, demanded a moral application to the self. Hopkins wrote in his notes on St. Ignatius: “This world is word, expression, news of God”; “it is a book he has written.... a poem of beauty: what is it about? His praise, the reverence due to him, the way to serve him.... Do I then do it? Never mind others now nor the race of man: DO I DO IT?” One of Hopkins’s attempts to answer that question is “The Windhover.”
    ellauri095.html on line 53: The initial “I” focuses attention on the speaker, but the explicit application of the lesson of the Book of Nature to him does not begin until the line “My heart in hiding/stirred for a bird” at the conclusion of the octet. One biographical interpretation of this line is that he was hiding from fulfilling his ambitions to be a great painter and poet. Instead of ostentatiously pursuing fame in that way, wearing his heart on his sleeve, he had chosen to be the “hidden man of the heart” (1 Peter 3:4), quietly pursuing the imitation of Christ. As Hopkins put it, Christ’s “hidden life at Nazareth is the great help to faith for us who must live more or less an obscure, constrained, and unsuccessful life.”
    ellauri095.html on line 55: Hopkins did live such a life, but the windhover reminded him of Jesus’ great achievements after Nazareth. The windhover “stirred” his desire to become a great knight of faith, one of those who imitate not only the constraint but also the “achieve of, the mastery of” this great chevalier. The “ecstasy” of the windhover recalls Hopkins’s initial desire in “Il Mystico” to be lifted up on “Spirit’s wings” so “that I may drink that ecstasy/Which to pure souls alone may be.” Ultimately, Hopkins became aware that he had been hiding from the emotional risks of total commitment to becoming a “pure” soul. The phrase “hiding” thus suggests not only hiding from the world or from worldly ambition but also hiding from God.
    ellauri095.html on line 57: The words “here/Buckle” which open the sestet mean “here in my heart,” therefore, as well as here in the bird and here in Jesus. Hopkins’s heart-in-hiding, Christ’s prey, sensed Him diving down to seize it for his own. Just as the bird buckled its wings together and thereby buckled its “brute beauty” and “valour”and capacity to “act,” so the speaker responds by buckling together all his considerable talents and renewing his commitment to the imitation of Christ in order to buckle down, buckle to, in serious preparation for the combat, the grappling, the buckling with the enemy. As Paul said, “Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the Devil.”
    ellauri095.html on line 61: The Windhover (kestrel, tuulihaukka) aims to depict not the bird in general, but instead one instance and its relation to the breeze. This is just one interpretation of Hopkins's most famous poem, one which he felt was his best.
    ellauri095.html on line 67: I caught this morning morning's minion, king- Mä bongasin tänä aamuna aamulehdenjakajan, au-
    ellauri095.html on line 68: dom of daylight's dauphin, dapple-dawn-drawn Falcon, in his riding rinkokunnan prinssin, Millennium Falconilla razastavan,
    ellauri095.html on line 71: In his ecstasy! then off, off forth on swing, ihan liekeissä! sit pois, pois keinulaudalla,
    ellauri095.html on line 86: Gerard Manley Hopkins SJ (28 July 1844 – 8 June 1889) was an English poet and Jesuit priest, whose posthumous fame established him among the leading Victorian poets. His manipulation of prosody – particularly his concept of sprung rhythm – established him as an innovative writer of verse, as did his technique of praising God through vivid use of imagery and nature. Only after his death did Robert Bridges begin to publish a few of Hopkins's mature poems in anthologies, hoping to prepare the way for wider acceptance of his style. By 1930 his work was recognised as one of the most original literary accomplishments of his century. It had a marked influence on such leading 20th-century poets as T. S. Eliot, Dylan Thomas, W. H. Auden, Stephen Spender and Cecil Day-Lewis.
    ellauri095.html on line 105: Uranian is a 19th-century term that referred to homosexual men. The term was first published by activist Karl Heinrich Ulrichs (1825–95) in a series of five booklets (1864–65) collected under the title Forschungen über das Räthsel der mannmännlichen Liebe (Research into the Riddle of Man–Male Love). Ulrichs derived Uranian (Urning in German) from the Greek goddess Aphrodite Urania, who was created out of the god Uranus' testicles. Therefore, it represents the homosexual gender, while Dionian (Dioning), derived from Aphrodite Dionea, represents the heterosexual gender. Ulrichs developed his terminology before the first public use of the term homosexual, which appeared in 1869 in a pamphlet published anonymously by Karl-Maria Kertbeny (1824–82)
    ellauri095.html on line 109: The term also gained currency among a group that studied Classics and dabbled in pederastic poetry from the 1870s to the 1930s. The writings of this group are now known by the phrase Uranian poetry. The art of Henry Scott Tuke and Wilhelm von Gloeden is also sometimes referred to as Uranian.
    ellauri095.html on line 111: The word itself alludes to Plato's Symposium, a discussion on Eros (love). In this dialog, Pausanias distinguishes between two types of love, symbolised by two different accounts of the birth of Aphrodite, the goddess of love. In one, she was born of Uranus (the heavens), a birth in which "the female has no part". This Uranian Aphrodite is associated with a noble love for male youths, and is the source of Ulrichs's term Urning. Another account has Aphrodite as the daughter of Zeus and Dione, and this Aphrodite is associated with a common love which "is apt to be of women as well as of youths, and is of the body rather than of the soul". After Dione, Ulrichs gave the name Dioning to men who are sexually attracted to women. However, unlike Plato's account of male love, Ulrichs understood male Urnings to be essentially feminine, and male Dionings to be masculine in nature.
    ellauri095.html on line 115: His father founded a marine insurance firm and at one time served as Hawaiian consul-general in London. He was also for a time churchwarden at St John-at-Hampstead. His grandfather was the physician John Simm Smith, a university colleague of John Keats, and close friend of the eccentric philanthropist Ann Thwaytes. One of his uncles was Charles Gordon Hopkins, a politician of the Hawaiian Kingdom.
    ellauri095.html on line 117: As a poet, Hopkins's father published works including A Philosopher's Stone and Other Poems (1843), Pietas Metrica (1849), and Spicelegium Poeticum, A Gathering of Verses by Manley Hopkins (1892). He reviewed poetry for The Times and wrote one novel. Catherine (Smith) Hopkins was the daughter of a London physician, particularly fond of music and of reading, especially German philosophy, literature and the novels of Dickens. Both parents were deeply religious high-church Anglicans. Catherine's sister, Maria Smith Giberne, taught her nephew Gerard to sketch. The interest was supported by his uncle, Edward Smith, his great-uncle Richard James Lane, a professional artist, and other family members.
    ellauri095.html on line 119: Hopkins's initial ambition was to be a painter – he would continue to sketch throughout his life and was inspired as an adult by the work of John Ruskin and the Pre-Raphaelites.
    ellauri095.html on line 121: By 1930 his work was recognised as one of the most original literary accomplishments of his century. It had a marked influence on such leading 20th-century poets as T. S. Eliot, Dylan Thomas, W. H. Auden, Stephen Spender and Cecil Day-Lewis.
    ellauri095.html on line 123: Hopkins became a skilled draughtsman. He found his early training in visual art supported his later work as a poet. His siblings were much inspired by language, religion and the creative arts. Milicent (1849–1946) joined an Anglican sisterhood in 1878. Kate (1856–1933) would help Hopkins publish the first edition of his poetry. Hopkins's youngest sister Grace (1857–1945) set many of his poems to music. Lionel (1854–1952) became a world-famous expert on archaic and colloquial Chinese. Arthur (1848–1930) and Everard (1860–1928) were highly successful artists. Cyril (1846–1932) would join his father's insurance firm.
    ellauri095.html on line 125: Manley Hopkins moved his family to Hampstead in 1852, near where John Keats had lived 30 years before and close to the green spaces of Hampstead Heath. When he was ten years old, Gerard was sent to board at Highgate School (1854–1863). While studying Keats´s poetry, he wrote "The Escorial" (1860), his earliest extant poem. Here he practised early attempts at asceticism. He once argued that most people drank more liquids than they really needed and bet that he could go without drinking for a week. He persisted until his tongue was black and he collapsed at drill. On another occasion he abstained from salt for a week.
    ellauri095.html on line 127: Among his teachers at Highgate was Richard Watson Dixon, who became an enduring friend and correspondent. Of the older pupils Hopkins recalls in his boarding house, the poet Philip Stanhope Worsley won the Newdigate Prize.
    ellauri095.html on line 129: Hopkins studied classics at Balliol College, Oxford (1863–1867). He began his time in Oxford as a keen socialite and prolific poet, but seems to have alarmed himself with resulting changes in his behaviour. There he forged a lifelong friendship with Robert Bridges (later Poet Laureate of the United Kingdom), which would be important to his development as a poet and in establishing his posthumous acclaim.
    ellauri095.html on line 135: A short fellow of 5’2 or 3”, he was enthusiastic, had a high-pitched voice, loved to sketch and write poems, was close to his family, and had warm, lifelong friends from Oxford, fellow Jesuits, and Irish families. For recreation he visited art exhibitions and old churches, and enjoyed holidays with his family, friends, and fellow Jesuits in Switzerland, Holland, the Isle of Wight, the Isle of Man, Whitby on the North Sea, Wales, Scotland, and the West of Ireland. During these holidays, he loved to hike and swim. His passions were nature (especially trees), ecology, beauty, poetry, art, his family and friends, his country, his religion, and his God. His curse was a lifelong “melancholy” (his word) which in 1885 in Dublin became deep depression and a sense of lost contact with God.
    ellauri095.html on line 137: In life and poetry he was serious and playful – even whimsical. Spiritually, despite an early scrupulosity which he never fully lost, he followed the Jesuit way of finding God in all things, and rejoiced in “God in the world”: “The world is charged wíth the grándeur of God.” He was very, very bright, with an extensive knowledge of words and languages — he knew so many words ! His intellectual hero was the medieval philosopher Duns Scotus, whose philosophy of selfhood he held dear. Hopkins himself had a strong sense of self, appreciated his own individuality, and was immensely self-confident.
    ellauri095.html on line 139: According to John Bayley, "All his life Hopkins was haunted by the sense of personal bankruptcy and impotence, the straining of 'time's eunuch' with no more to 'spend'... " a sense of inadequacy, graphically expressed in his last sonnets. Toward the end of his life, Hopkins suffered several long bouts of depression. His "terrible sonnets" struggle with problems of religious doubt. He described them to Bridges as "the thin gleanings of a long weary while."
    ellauri095.html on line 145: After several years of ill health and bouts of diarrhoea, Hopkins died of typhoid fever in 1889 and was buried in Glasnevin Cemetery, after a funeral in St Francis Xavier Church in Gardiner Street, located in Georgian Dublin. He is thought to have suffered throughout his life from what today might be labelled bipolar disorder or chronic unipolar depression, and battled a deep sense of melancholic anguish. However, his last words on his death bed were, "I am so happy, I am so happy. I loved my life." He was 44 years of age.
    ellauri095.html on line 147: The image of the poet´s estrangement from God figures in "I wake and feel the fell of dark, not day", in which he describes lying awake before dawn, likening his prayers to "dead letters sent To dearest him that lives alas! away." The opening line recalls Lamentations 3:2: "He hath led me, and brought me into darkness, but not into light." "No Wurst, There is None" and "Carrion Comfort" are also counted among the "terrible sonnets".
    ellauri095.html on line 149: During his lifetime, Hopkins published few poems. It was only through the efforts of Robert Bridges that his works were seen.
    ellauri095.html on line 153: Despite Hopkins burning all his poems on entering the Jesuit novitiate, he had already sent some to Bridges, who with some other friends, was one of the few people to see many of them for some years. After Hopkins's death they were distributed to a wider audience, mostly fellow poets, and in 1918 Bridges, by then poet laureate, published a collected edition; an expanded edition, prepared by Charles Williams, appeared in 1930, and a greatly expanded edition by William Henry Gardner appeared in 1948 (eventually reaching a fourth edition, 1967, with N. H. Mackenzie).
    ellauri095.html on line 159: He influenced such poets as W.H. Auden, Dylan Thomas, Theodore Roethke, Elizabeth Bishop, John Berryman, Robert Lowell, Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath, Denise Levertov, and the Nobel Laureate Seamus Heaney. In the 1920s and 30s, he was a darling of the British and American “New Critics” who prized and probed his poems’ rich “texture.”
    ellauri095.html on line 163: Robert Martin asserts that when Hopkins first met Dolben, on Dolben´s 17th birthday in Oxford in February 1865, it "was, quite simply, the most momentous emotional event of his undergraduate years, probably of his entire life." According to Robert Martin, "Hopkins was completely taken with Dolben, who was nearly four years his junior, and his private journal for confessions the following year proves how absorbed he was in imperfectly suppressed erotic thoughts of him." Martin also considers it "probable that Hopkins would have been deeply shocked at real sexual intimacy with another guy."
    ellauri095.html on line 167: Hopkins composed two poems about Dolben, "Where art thou friend" and "The Beginning of the End". Robert Bridges, who edited the first edition of Dolben's poems as well as Hopkins's, cautioned that the second poem "must never be printed," though Bridges himself included it in the first edition (1918). Another indication of the nature of his feelings for Dolben is that Hopkins's high Anglican confessor seems to have forbidden him to have any contact with Dolben except by letter. Hopkins never saw Dolben again after the latter's short visit to Oxford during which they met, and any continuation of their relationship was abruptly ended by Dolben's drowning two years later in June 1867. Hopkins's feeling for Dolben seems to have cooled by that time, but he was nonetheless greatly affected by his death. "Ironically, fate may have bestowed more through Dolben's death than it could ever have bestowed through longer life ... for many of Hopkins's best poems – impregnated with an elegiac longing for Dolben, his lost beloved and his muse – were the result." Hopkins's relationship with Dolben is explored in the novel The Hopkins Conundrum.
    ellauri095.html on line 174: The homosexual lifestyle results in a shorter life expectancy. This is undoubtedly due to the health risks associated, such as AIDS, Hepatitis, and a variety of other infections and STDs. In addition, homosexuals are more likely to be smokers, which takes the lifespan even lower. In 1993 Paul Cameron published a study which found that homosexuality takes 20-30 years off the lives of its practitioners. Cameron is a Psychologist and founder of the Family Research Institute. Among men with AIDS their lifespan was 39 years, however even without AIDS a male homosexuals lifespan is just a short 42 years. Lesbians had a median age of death of just 44 years. He also found that lesbians were up to 456 times more likely to die in a car crash than heterosexual women. The liberal Southern Poverty Law Centre dubbed Cameron an "anti-gay extremist", and the American Psychological Association expelled him for exposing the truth about the homosexual lifestyle and accused him of scientific data "fraud". Fortunately, Cameron had the support of faith based groups who would not bow down or turn their behinds to the homosexual agenda.
    ellauri095.html on line 178: The aim of our research was never to spread more homophobia, but to demonstrate to an international audience how the life expectancy of gay and bisexual men can be estimated from limited vital statistics data. In our paper, we demonstrated that in a major Canadian centre, life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 21 years less than for all men. If the same pattern of mortality continued, we estimated that nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently aged 20 years would not reach their 65th birthday. Under even the most liberal assumptions, gay and bisexual men in this urban centre were experiencing a life expectancy similar to that experienced by men in Canada in the year 1871. In contrast, if we were to repeat this analysis today the life expectancy of gay and bisexual men would be greatly improved. Deaths from HIV infection have declined dramatically in this population since 1996. As we have previously reported there has been a threefold decrease in mortality in Vancouver as well as in other parts of British Columbia.
    ellauri095.html on line 184: Hopkins was a supporter of linguistic purism in English. In an 1882 letter to Robert Bridges, Hopkins writes: "It makes one weep to think what English might have been; for in spite of all that Shakespeare and Milton have done... no beauty in a language can make up for want of purity." He took time to learn Old English, which became a major influence on his writing. In the same letter to Bridges he calls Old English "a vastly superior thing to what we have now."
    ellauri095.html on line 186: He uses many archaic and dialect words but also coins new words. One example of this is twindles, which seems from its context in Inversnaid to mean a combination of twines and dwindles. He often creates compound adjectives, sometimes with a hyphen (such as dapple-dawn-drawn falcon) but often without, as in rolling level underneath him steady air. This use of compound adjectives, similar to the Old English use of compounds nouns, concentrates his images, communicating to his readers the instress of the poet´s perceptions of an inkscape.
    ellauri095.html on line 190: An important element in Hopkins work is his own concept of inkscape, which was derived in part from the medieval theologian Duns Scotus.
    ellauri095.html on line 196: Inkscape, for Hopkins, is the charged essence, the absolute singularity that gives each created thing its being; instress is both the energy that holds the inscape together and the process by which this inscape is perceived by an observer. We instress the inscape of a tulip, Hopkins would say, when we appreciate the particular delicacy of its petals, when we are enraptured by its specific, inimitable shade of pink.
    ellauri095.html on line 199: No no, he usually sought the distinctively unifying design, the “returning” or recurrent pattern, the internal “network” of structural relationships which clearly and unmistakably integrates or scapes an object or set of objects and thus reveals the presence of integrating laws throughout nature and a divine unifying force or “stress” in this world.
    ellauri095.html on line 203: The suggestion of metaphysical significance is obvious in an 1874 note by Hopkins on waves: “The laps of running foam striking the sea-wall double on themselves and return in nearly the same order and shape in which they came. This is mechanical reflection and is the same as optical: indeed all nature is mechanical, but then it is not seen that mechanics contain that which is beyond mechanics.”
    ellauri095.html on line 207: Nevertheless, even after he became a Jesuit he continued to cultivate an acquaintance with the visual arts through drawing and attendance at exhibitions, and this lifelong attraction to the visual arts affected the verbal art for which he is remembered. In his early poetry and in his journals wordpainting is pervasive, and there is a recurrent Keatsian straining after the stasis of the plastic arts.
    ellauri095.html on line 209: The typical Hopkins drawing is what Ruskin called the “outline drawing”; as Ruskin put it, “without any wash of colour, such an outline is the most valuable of all means for obtaining such memoranda of any scene as may explain to another person, or record for yourself, what is most important in its features.” Many such practical purposes for drawing were advanced by Ruskin, but his ultimate purpose was to unite science, art, and religion.
    ellauri095.html on line 213: it would appear that Arthur Hopkins’s superior sketching abilities encouraged his older but smaller brother to concentrate his energies on literary and religious creativity instead.
    ellauri095.html on line 220: The brilliant student who had left Oxford with first-class honours failed his final theology exam. This almost certainly meant that despite his ordination in 1877, Hopkins would not progress in the order. In 1877 he wrote God's Grandeur, an array of sonnets that included "The Starlight Night". He finished "The Windhover" only a few months before his ordination. His life as a Jesuit trainee, though rigorous, isolated and sometimes unpleasant, at least had some stability; the uncertain and varied work after ordination was even harder on his sensibilities. In October 1877, not long after completing "The Sea and the Skylark" and only a month after his ordination, Hopkins took up duties as sub-minister and teacher at Mount St Mary's College near Sheffield. In July 1878 he became curated at the Jesuit church in Mount Street, London, and in December that of St Aloysius's Church, Oxford, then moving to Manchester, Liverpool and Glasgow. While ministering in Oxford, he became a founding member of The Cardinal Newman Boozing Society, established in 1878 for Catholic members of the University of Oxford. He taught Greek and Latin at Mount St Mary's College, Sheffield, and Stonyhurst College, Lancashire.
    ellauri095.html on line 223: In 1884 he became a professor of Greek and Latin at University College Dublin. His English roots and disagreement with the Irish politics of the time, along with his small stature (5 ft 2 in or 1.57 m), unprepossessing nature and personal oddities, reduced his effectiveness as a teacher.
    ellauri095.html on line 225: This and his isolation in Ireland deepened a gloom that was reflected in his poems of the time, such as "I Wake and Feel the Fell of Dark, not Day". They came to be known as the "terrible sonnets", not for their quality but according to Hopkins's friend Canon Richard Watson Dixon, because they reached the "terrible crystal", meaning they crystallised the melancholic dejection that plagued the later part of Hopkins's life.
    ellauri095.html on line 227: Several issues led to a melancholic state and restricted his poetic inspiration in his last five years. His workload was heavy. He disliked living in Dublin, away from England and friends. He was disappointed at how far the city had fallen from its Georgian elegance of the previous century. His general health suffered and his eyesight began to fail. He felt confined and dejected. As a devout Jesuit, he found himself in an artistic dilemma. To subdue an egotism that he felt would violate the humility required by his religious position, he decided never to publish his poems. But Hopkins realised that any true poet requires an audience for criticism and encouragement. This conflict between his religious obligations and his poetic talent made him feel he had failed at both.
    ellauri095.html on line 233: In a journal entry of 6 November 1865, Hopkins declared an ascetic intention for his life and work: "On this day by God's grace I resolved to give up all beauty until I had His leave for it."
    ellauri095.html on line 234: On 18 January 1866, Hopkins composed his most ascetic poem, The Habit of Perfection. On 23 January, he included poetry in a list of things to be given up for Lent. In July, he decided to become a Roman Catholic and travelled to Birmingham in September to consult the leader of the Oxford converts, John Henry Newman. Newman received him into the Roman Catholic Church on 21 October 1866.
    ellauri095.html on line 238: The decision to convert estranged Hopkins from his family and from a number of acquaintances. After graduating in 1867, he was provided by Newman with a teaching post at the Oratory in Birmingham. While there he began to study the violin. On 5 May 1868 Hopkins firmly "resolved to be a religious." Less than a week later, he made a bonfire of his poetry and gave it up almost entirely for seven years. Fortunately he did not burn his Bridges like Savonarola. He also felt a call to enter the ministry and decided to become a Jesuit. He paused first to visit Switzerland, which officially forbade Jesuits to enter.
    ellauri095.html on line 240: In September 1868 Hopkins began his Jesuit novitiate at Manresa House, Roehampton, under the guidance of Alfred Weld. Two years later he moved to St Mary´s Hall, Stonyhurst, for philosophical studies, taking vows of poverty, chastity and obedience on 8 September 1870. He felt that his interest in poetry had stopped him devoting himself wholly to religion. However, on reading Duns Scotus in 1872, he saw how the two need not conflict.
    ellauri095.html on line 246: In 1874 Hopkins returned to Manresa House to teach classics. While studying in the Jesuit house of theological studies, St Beuno´s College, near St Asap in North Wales, he was asked by his religious superior to write a poem to commemorate the foundering of a German ship in a storm. So in 1875 he took up poetry once more to write a lengthy piece, "The Wreck of the Deutschland", inspired by the Deutschland incident, a maritime disaster in which 157 people died, including five Franciscan nuns who had been leaving Germany due to harsh anti-Catholic laws (see Kulturkampf). The work displays both the religious concerns and some of the unusual metre and rhythms of his subsequent poetry not present in his few remaining early works. It not only depicts the dramatic events and heroic deeds, but tells of him reconciling the terrible events with God´s higher purpose. The poem was accepted but not printed by a Jesuit publication. This rejection fed his ambivalence about his poetry, most of which remained unpublished until after his death.
    ellauri095.html on line 248: Hopkins invites a comparison between his persona and Christina’s erstwhile lover, James Collinson, who also became a follower of the Pre-Raphaelites and convert to Catholicism and, for a while, a Jesuit. Eventually, by converting to Catholicism himself and joining the Society of Jesus, Hopkins exchanged the inferior position articulated in “A Voice from the World” for a superior one, superior at least in the sense that Christina Rossetti apparently felt that her sister Maria, who actually did cross the convent threshold and become a religious, had achieved a higher stage of religious development than she herself did.
    ellauri095.html on line 250: Both poets concluded their literary careers with devotional commentaries: in Hopkins’s case, his unfinished “Commentary on the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius.”
    ellauri095.html on line 256: Christina Georgina Rossetti (5 December 1830 – 29 December 1894) was an English poet who wrote romantic, devotional, and children´s poems. "Goblin Market" and "Remember" remain famous. She also wrote the words of two Christmas carols well known in the UK: "In the Bleak Midwinter", later set by Gustav Holst and by Harold Darke, and "Love Came Down at Christmas", also set by Darke and by other composers. She was little sister (2 years junior) of the artist and poet Dante Gabriel Rossetti and features in several of his paintings.
    ellauri095.html on line 318: i am missing this world Et oon lähdössä.
    ellauri095.html on line 372: Topic(s) of this poem: death
    ellauri095.html on line 379: It is such a heart touching poem, I really appreciate his work..
    ellauri095.html on line 380: This poem has not been translated into any other language yet.
    ellauri095.html on line 381: I would like to translate this poem.
    ellauri095.html on line 396: Lapsena Dante Gabriel Rossetti alkoi taidemaalarixi ja kuvitti kirjallisia aiheita varhaisissa piirustuksissaan. Häntä opetettiin kotona saksaksi ja hän luki saxaxi Raamattua, Shakespearea, Goethen Faustia, Arabian yötä, Dickensiä sekä Sir Walter Scottin ja Lord Byronin runoutta. Päättyään koulusta hän opiskeli historiallisen taidemaalari Ford Madox Brownin luona, josta tuli myöhemmin hänen lähin elinikäinen ystävänsä. Hän jatkoi myös hämärämiesten runouden lukemista – Poe, Shelley, Coleridge, Blake, Keats, Browning ja Tennyson - ja aloitti vuonna 1845 käännökset italialaisesta ja saksalaisesta keskiaikaisesta runoudesta. Vuosina 1847 ja 1848 Rossetti aloitti useita tärkeitä varhaisia ​​runoja - Siskoni uni, Siunattu Damozel, Morsiamen alkusoitto, Marian muotokuvasta, Ave, Jenny, Dante Veronassa, Viimeinen tunnustus ja useita sonetteja, joissa hänestä tuli lopulta oikea asiantuntija.
    ellauri095.html on line 453: Christina Rossetti became for Hopkins the embodiment of the medievalism of the Pre-Raphaelites, the Oxford Movement, and Victorian religious poetry generally. In the 1860s Hopkins was profoundly influenced by her example and succeeded, unbeknownst to her and to the critics of his time, in becoming a rival far greater than any of her contemporaries.
    ellauri095.html on line 455: Their rivalry began with Hopkins’s response to her poem “The Convent Threshold.” Geoffrey Hartman was clearly on the right track when he suggested in the introduction to Hopkins: A Collection of Critical Essays (1966) that “Hopkins seems to develop his lyric structures out of the Pre-Raphaelite dream vision. In his early ‘A Vision of the Mermaids’; and ‘St. Dorothea’; he may be struggling with such poems as Christina Rossetti’s ‘Convent Threshold’; and Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s ‘The Blessed Damozel,’ poems in which the poet stands at a lower level than the vision, or is irrevocably, pathetically distanced.” Such poems were the essence of medievalism in poetry according to William Morris, who felt that Keats’s “La Belle Dame Sans Merci” was the germ from which all Pre-Raphaelite poetry sprang. Standing beyond Keats, however, the primary source was Dante. Christina Rossetti clearly alludes to Beatrice’s appeal to Dante in “The Convent Threshold”:
    ellauri095.html on line 469: Scholars have long debated whether the historical Beatrice is intended to be identified with either or both of the Beatrices in Dante´s writings. She was apparently the daughter of the banker Folco Portinari, and was married to another banker, Simone dei Bardi. Dante claims to have met a "Beatrice" only twice, on occasions separated by nine years, but was so affected by the meetings that he carried his love for her throughout his life.
    ellauri095.html on line 473: Nancy J. Chodorow states that homophobia can be viewed as a method of protection of male masculinity. Various psychoanalytic theories explain homophobia as a threat to an individual´s own same-sex impulses, whether those impulses are imminent or merely hypothetical. This threat causes repression, denial or reaction formation.
    ellauri095.html on line 477: As Hopkins commented in a letter, Savonarola was “the only person in history (except perhaps Origen) about whom” he had “real feeling,” because for Hopkins Savonarola was “the prophet of Christian art.”
    ellauri095.html on line 483: The sequence of events is clear. On 18 January 1866 Hopkins composed his most ascetic poem, “The Habit of Perfection” (Täydellinen asukokonaisuus). On 23 January he included poetry in the list of things to be given up for Lent. In July he decided to become a Catholic, and he traveled to Birmingham in September to consult the leader of the Oxford converts, John Henry Newman. Newman received him into the Church in October. On 5 May 1868 Hopkins firmly “resolved to be a religious.” Less than a week later, apparently still inspired by Savonarola, he made a bonfire of his poems and gave up poetry almost entirely for seven years. Finally, in the fall of 1868 Hopkins joined a “serged fellowship” like Savonarola’s and like the one he admired in “Eastern Communion”(1865), a commitment foreshadowed by the emphasis on vows of silence and poverty in “The Habit of Perfection.”
    ellauri095.html on line 487: John Henry Newman (21 February 1801 – 11 August 1890) was an English theologian and poet, first an Anglican priest and later a Catholic priest and cardinal, who was an important and controversial figure in the religious history of England in the 19th century. He was known nationally by the mid-1830s, and was canonised as a saint in the Catholic Church in 2019.
    ellauri095.html on line 495: The best-known portrait of Cardinal Newman -- soon to become the last British Catholic saint -- is by Millais and shows an elderly gentleman with a refined and perhaps, indeed, rather feminised appearance. In his lifetime, contemporaries remarked on Newman´s "effeminate" manner, as they then said, although sometimes this was a sly way of attacking him.
    ellauri095.html on line 499: Hopkins had been attracted to asceticism since childhood. At Highgate, for instance, he argued that nearly everyone consumed more liquids than the body needed, and, to prove it, he wagered that he could go without liquids for at least a week. He persisted until his tongue was black and he collapsed at drill. He won not only his wager but also the undying enmity of the headmaster Dr. John Bradley Dyne. On another occasion, he abstained from salt for a week. His continuing insistence on extremes of self-denial later in life struck some of his fellow Jesuits as more appropriate to a Victorian Puritan than to a Catholic.
    ellauri095.html on line 508: This potential for a new sacramental poetry was first realized by Hopkins in The Wreck of the Deutschland. Hopkins recalled that when he read about the wreck of the German ship Deutschland off the coast of England it “made a deep impression on me, more than any other wreck or accident I ever read of,” a statement made all the more impressive when we consider the number of shipwrecks he must have discussed with his father. Hopkins wrote about this particular disaster at the suggestion of Fr. James Jones, Rector of St. Beuno’s College, where Hopkins studied theology from 1874 to 1877. Hopkins recalled that “What I had written I burnt before I became a Jesuit and resolved to write no more, as not belonging to my profession, unless it were by the wish of my superiors; so for seven years I wrote nothing but two or three little presentation pieces which occasion called for [presumably ‘Rosa Mystica’ and ‘Ad Mariam’]. But when in the winter of ’75 the Deutschland was wrecked in the mouth of the Thames and five Franciscan nuns, exiles from Germany by the Falck Laws, aboard of her were drowned I was affected by the account and happening to say so to my rector he said that he wished someone would write a poem on the subject. On this hint I set to work and, though my hand was out at first, produced one. I had long had haunting my ear the echo of a new rhythm which now I realized on paper.”
    ellauri095.html on line 510: The result is an ode of thirty-five eight-line stanzas, divided into two parts. The first part, consisting of ten stanzas, is autobiographical, recalling how God touched the speaker in his own life. The second begins with seven stanzas dramatizing newspaper accounts of the wreck. Then fourteen stanzas narrow the focus to a single passenger, the tallest of the five nuns who drowned. She was heard to call on Christ before her death. The last four stanzas address God directly and culminate in a call for the conversion of England.
    ellauri095.html on line 512: The Wreck of the Deutschland became the occasion for Hopkins’s incarnation as a poet in his own right. He broke with the Keatsian wordpainting style with which he began, replacing his initial prolixity, stasis, and lack of construction with a concise, dramatic unity. He rejected his original attraction to Keats’s sensual aestheticism for a clearly moral, indeed a didactic, rhetoric. He saw nature not only as a pleasant spectacle as Keats had; he also confronted its seemingly infinite destructiveness as few before or after him have done. In this shipwreck he perceived the possibility of a theodicy, a vindication of God’s justice which would counter the growing sense of the disappearance of God among the Victorians. For Hopkins, therefore, seeing more clearly than ever before the proselytic possibilities of art, his rector’s suggestion that someone write a poem about the wreck became the theological sanction he needed to begin reconciling his religious and poetic vocations.
    ellauri095.html on line 514: Nevertheless, although The Wreck of the Deutschland was a great breakthrough to the vision of God immanent in nature and thus to the sacramentalism that was to be the basis of the great nature poems of the following years, when Hopkins sent the poem to his friend Robert Bridges, Bridges refused to reread it despite Hopkins’s pleas. The poem was also rejected by the Jesuit magazine the Month, primarily because of its new “sprung” rhythm, and many subsequent readers have had difficulty with it as well.
    ellauri095.html on line 516: The relationship between Hopkins and his father reveals important early instances of creative collaboration and competition within the family. Hopkins copied eleven of the poems from his father’s volume A Philosopher’s Stone into his Oxford notebooks. In those poems his father expressed a Keatsian dismay over science’s threat to a magical or imaginative response to nature.
    ellauri095.html on line 518: The motif of the singing bird appears again in Gerard’s “Spring” (1877): “and thrush/Through the echoing timber does so rinse and wring/The ear, it strikes like lightnings to hear him sing.” The father’s attempt to represent what it is like to live in a bird’s environment, moreover, to experience daily the “fields, the open sky, /The rising sun, the moon’s pale majesty; /The leafy bower, where the airy nest is hung” was also one of the inspirations of the son’s lengthy account of a lark’s gliding beneath clouds, its aerial view of the fields below, and its proximity to a rainbow in “Il Mystico” (1862), as well as the son’s attempt to enter into a lark’s existence and express its essence mimically in “The Woodlark” (1876). A related motif, Manley’s feeling for clouds, evident in his poem “Clouds,” encouraged his son’s representation of them in “Hurrahing in Harvest’ (1877) and “That Nature is a Heraclitean Fire”(1888).
    ellauri095.html on line 520: Competition and collaboration between father and son continued even long after Hopkins left home to take his place in the world. In 1879, for instance, Gerard Manley Hopkins wrote to Bridges, “I enclose some lines by my father called forth by the proposal to fell the trees in Well Walk (where Keats and other interesting people lived) and printed in some local paper.” Two months later Hopkins composed “Binsey Poplars” to commemorate the felling of a grove of trees near Oxford. Clearly, competition with his father was an important creative stimulus.
    ellauri095.html on line 522: In addition to specific inspirations such as these, the father communicated to his son a sense of nature as a book written by God which leads its readers to a thoughtful contemplation of Him, a theme particularly evident in Manley and Thomas Marsland Hopkins’s book of poems, Pietas Metrica. Consequently, Gerard went on to write poems which were some of the best expressions not only of the Romantic approach to nature but also the older tradition of explicitly religious nature poetry.
    ellauri095.html on line 528: Hopkins eventually began to be critical of mere love of detail, however––“that kind of thought which runs upon the concrete and the particular, which disintegrates and drops toward atomism in some shape or other,” he wrote in his journal––and he became increasingly aware of the importance of religion as the ultimate source of unity.
    ellauri095.html on line 533: His religious consciousness increased dramatically when he entered Oxford, the city of spires. From April of 1863, when he first arrived with some of his journals, drawings, and early Keatsian poems in hand, until June of 1867 when he graduated, Hopkins felt the charm of Oxford, “steeped in sentiment as she lies,” as Matthew Arnold had said, “spreading her gardens to the moonlight and whispering from her towers the last enchantments of the Middle Ages.” Here he became more fully aware of the religious implications of the medievalism of Ruskin, Dixon, and the Pre-Raphaelites. Inspired also by Christina Rossetti, the Catholic doctrine of the Real Presence of God in the Eucharist, and by the Victorian preoccupation with the fifteenth-century Italian religious reformer Girolamo Savonarola, he soon embraced Ruskin’s definition of “Medievalism” as a “confession of Christ” opposed to both “Classicalism” (“Pagan Faith”) and “Modernism” (the “denial of Christ”).
    ellauri095.html on line 535: Manley Hopkins’s desire to preserve a Wordsworthian love of nature in his children is evident in his “To a Beautiful Child”:
    ellauri095.html on line 545: This was a remarkably prophetic poem for Manley Hopkins’s first “beautiful child,” Gerard, born only a year after this poem was published.
    ellauri095.html on line 546: The phrase “And birds that call/Hoarse to the storm,” invites comparison with the son’s images of the windhover rebuffing the big wind in “The Windhover” (1877) and with the image of the great storm fowl at the conclusion of “Henry Purcell” (1879). The father’s prophecy, “thy sport is with the storm/To wrestle” is fulfilled in Gerard’s The Wreck of the Deutschland and “The Loss of the Eurydice” (1878). These two shipwreck poems, replete with spiritual instruction for those in doubt and danger were the son’s poetic and religious counterparts to his father’s 1873 volume, The Port of Refuge, or advice and instructions to the Master-Mariner in situations of doubt, difficulty, and danger.
    ellauri095.html on line 550: Compare Gerard Manley Hopkins’s version of an attempted rescue with the account in the London Times, one of the sources he used for The Wreck of the Deutschland. According to the Times, “One brave sailor, who was safe in the rigging went down to try to save a child or woman who was drowning on deck. He was secured by a rope to the rigging, but a wave dashed him against the bulwark, and when daylight dawned his headless body, detained by the rope, was swinging to and fro with the waves.” Hopkins wrote:
    ellauri095.html on line 555: He was pitched to his death at a blow, Sen kimmahdutti jorpakkoon raakapuu,
    ellauri095.html on line 556: For all his dreadnought breast and braids of thew: sinne meni sixpäkki sekä haba yhtä kyytiä;
    ellauri095.html on line 567: Hopkins transformed the prose into song, but he deleted the morbid details of the decapitation. It was no doubt partly to escape contemplation of such details connected with his marine-insurance business that Manley Hopkins cultivated a Wordsworthian love of nature.
    ellauri095.html on line 574: She broke her back on the sands and foundered with the loss of about 57 passengers, both men and women; the conditions which had caused the wreck in the first place also preventing her from being seen from shore, and thus assistance being given. In the immediate aftermath of the wreck the captain accused passing ships of failing to answer his vessel´s signals of distress.
    ellauri096.html on line 55: Michael Scriven (1964) tried to refute predictive determinism (the thesis that all events are foreseeable), by conjuring two players, “Predictor” who has all the data, laws, and calculating capacity needed to predict the choices of others. Scriven goes on to imagine, “Avoider”, whose dominant motivation is to avoid prediction. Therefore, Predictor must conceal his prediction. The catch is that Avoider has access to the same data, laws, and calculating capacity as Predictor. Thus Avoider can duplicate Predictor’s reasoning. Consequently, the optimal predictor cannot predict Avoider. Let the teacher be Avoider and the student be Predictor. Avoider must win. Therefore, it is possible to give a surprise test. This sounds silly. The Predictor can predict that the Avoider double guesses her. Both can fiture out that this will go on and on, until time runs out, and they still just sit on their asses doing nothing. Thing is, you must remember that the players are part of the game, not outside of it as idealists would have it.
    ellauri096.html on line 59: Predictive determinism states that everything is foreseeable. Metaphysical determinism states that there is only one way the future could be given the way the past is. Simon Laplace used metaphysical determinism as a premise for predictive determinism. He reasoned that since every event has a cause, a complete description of any stage of history combined with the laws of nature implies what happens at any other stage of the universe. Scriven was only challenging predictive determinism in his thought experiment. The next approach challenges metaphysical determinism.
    ellauri096.html on line 65: Maybe all of your defecation is compulsory. If God exists, then He knows everything. So the threat to freedom becomes total for the theist. The problem of divine foreknowledge insinuates that theism precludes morality. (This takes some more arguing, namely that morality implies free will, proof omitted.)
    ellauri096.html on line 67: In response to the apparent conflict between freedom and foreknowledge, medieval philosophers denied that future contingent propositions have a truth-value. That´s silly. They took themselves to be extending a solution Aristotle discusses in De Interpretatione to the problem of logical fatalism. According to this truth-value gap approach, ‘You will take a dump tomorrow’ is not true now. The prediction will become true tomorrow. A morally serious theist can agree with the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam:
    ellauri096.html on line 74: Cod’s omniscience only requires that He knows every true proposition. God will know ‘You will take a shit’ as soon it becomes true – like when the turd is halfway out - but not before. Naah, this is really weak. That takes no omniscience, just a good nose.
    ellauri096.html on line 92: W. V. Quine insists that the student’s elimination argument is only a reductio ad absurdum of the supposition that the student knows that the announcement is true (rather than a reductio of the announcement itself). He accepts this epistemic reductio but rejects the metaphysical reductio. Given the student’s ignorance of the announcement, Quine concludes that a test on any day would be unforeseen.
    ellauri096.html on line 94: In later writings, Quine evinces general reservations about the concept of knowledge. One of his pet objections is that ‘know’ is vague. If knowledge entails absolute certainty, then too little will count as known. Quine infers that we must equate knowledge with firmly held true belief. Asking just how firm the belief must be is akin to asking just how big something has to be to count as being big. There is no answer to the question because ‘big’ lacks the sort of boundary enjoyed by precise words.
    ellauri096.html on line 96: There is no place in science for bigness, because of this lack of boundary; but there is a place for the relation of biggerness. Here we see the familiar and widely applicable rectification of vagueness: disclaim the vague positive and cleave to the precise comparative. But it is inapplicable to the verb ‘know’, even grammatically. Verbs have no comparative and superlative inflections … . I think that for scientific or philosophical purposes the best we can do is give up the notion of knowledge as a bad job and make do rather with its separate ingredients. We can still speak of a belief as true, and of one belief as firmer or more certain, to the believer’s mind, than another (1987, 109).
    ellauri096.html on line 102: Science is about what is the case rather than what ought to be case. This seems to imply that science does not tell us what we ought to believe. The traditional way to fill the normative gap is to delegate issues of justification to epistemologists. However, Quine is uncomfortable with delegating such authority to philosophers. He prefers the thesis that psychology is enough to handle the issues traditionally addressed by epistemologists (or at least the issues still worth addressing in an Age of Science). This “naturalistic epistemology” seems to imply that ‘know’ and ‘justified’ are antiquated terms – as empty as ‘phlogiston’ or ‘soul’.
    ellauri096.html on line 104: Those willing to abandon the concept of knowledge can dissolve the surprise test paradox. But to epistemologists, this is like using a suicide bomb to kill a fly.
    ellauri096.html on line 114: The agnostic might be tempted to avoid presumptuousness by converting to meta-agnosticism. But this “retreats” in the wrong direction. Meta-meta-proof is, in turn, even more demanding than meta-proof. Meta-meta-proof requires both the epistemological premises about what constitutes proof that meta-proof needs and, in addition, meta-meta-proof needs epistemological premises about what constitutes meta-proof.
    ellauri096.html on line 116: The eliminativist has even more severe difficulties in stating his position than the skeptic. Some eliminativists dismiss the threat of self-defeat by drawing an analogy. Those who denied the existence of souls were accused of undermining a necessary condition for asserting anything. However, the soul theorist’s account of what is needed gives no reason to deny that a healthy brain suffices for mental states.
    ellauri096.html on line 118: If the eliminativist thinks that assertion only imposes the aim of expressing a truth, then he can consistently assert that ‘know’ is a defective term. However, an epistemologist can revive the charge of self-defeat by showing that assertion does indeed require the speaker to attribute knowledge to himself. This knowledge-based account of assertion has recently been supported by work on our next paradox.
    ellauri096.html on line 120: Probabilistic skepticism dates back to Arcesilaus who took over the Academy two generations after Plato’s death. This moderate kind of skepticism, recounted by Cicero (Academica 2.74, 1.46) from his days as a student at the Academy, allows for justified belief. Many scientists are attracted to probabilism and dismiss the epistemologist’s preoccupation with knowledge as old-fashioned.
    ellauri096.html on line 126: In 1961 Henry Kyburg pointed out that this policy conflicted with a principle of agglomeration: If you rationally believe p
    ellauri096.html on line 136: Foundationalists reject (1). They take some propositions to be self-evident. Coherentists reject (2). They tolerate some forms of circular reasoning. For instance, Nelson Goodman (1965) has characterized the method of reflective equilibrium as virtuously circular. Charles Peirce (1933–35, 5.250) rejected (3), an approach later refined by Peter Klein (2007) and championed at book-length by Scott F. Aikin (2011). Infinitists believe that infinitely long chains of justification are no more impossible than infinitely long chains of causation. Finally, the epistemological anarchist rejects (4). As Paul Feyerabend refrains in Against Method, “Anything goes” (1988, vii, 5, 14, 19, 159).
    ellauri096.html on line 142: If you know that your beliefs are jointly inconsistent, then you should reject R. M. Sainsbury’s definition of a paradox as “an apparently unacceptable conclusion derived by apparently acceptable reasoning from apparently acceptable premises” (1995, 1). Take the negation of any of your beliefs as a conclusion and your remaining beliefs as the premises. You should judge this jumble argument as valid, and as having premises that you accept, and yet as having a conclusion you reject (Sorensen 2003b, 104–110). If the conclusion of this argument counts as a paradox, then the negation of any of your beliefs counts as a paradox.
    ellauri096.html on line 144: The resemblance between the preface paradox and the surprise test paradox becomes more visible through an intermediate case. The preface of Siddhartha Mukherjee’s The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer warns: “In cases where there was no prior public knowledge, or when interviewees requested privacy, I have used a false name, and deliberately confounded identities to make it difficult to track.” Those who refuse consent to be lied to are free to close Doctor Mukherjee’s chronicle. But nearly all readers think the physician’s trade-off between lies and new information is acceptable. They rationally anticipate being rationally misled. Nevertheless, these readers learn much about the history of cancer. Similarly, students who are warned that they will receive a surprise test rationally expect to be rationally misled about the day of the test. The prospect of being misled does not lead them to drop the course.
    ellauri096.html on line 146: The preface paradox pressures Kyburg to extend his tolerance of joint inconsistency to the acceptance of contradictions (Sorensen 2001, 156–158). Consider a logic student who is required to pick one hundred truths from a mixed list of tautologies and contradictions. Although the modest student believes each of his answers, A1,A2,…,A100
    ellauri096.html on line 147: , he also believes that at least of one these answers is false. This ensures he believes a contradiction. If any of his answers is false, then the student believes a contradiction (because the only falsehoods on the question list are contradictions). If all of his test answers are true, then the student believes the following contradiction: ∼(A1&A2&…&A100)
    ellauri096.html on line 151: If paradoxes were always sets of propositions or arguments or conclusions, then they would always be meaningful. But some paradoxes are semantically flawed (Sorensen 2003b, 352) and some have answers that are backed by a pseudo-argument employing a defective “lemma” that lacks a truth-value. Kurt Grelling’s paradox, for instance, opens with a distinction between autological and heterological words. An autological word describes itself, e.g., ‘polysyllabic’ is polysllabic, ‘English’ is English, ‘noun’ is a noun, etc. A heterological word does not describe itself, e.g., ‘monosyllabic’ is not monosyllabic, ‘Chinese’ is not Chinese, ‘verb’ is not a verb, etc. Now for the riddle: Is ‘heterological’ heterological or autological? If ‘heterological’ is heterological, then since it describes itself, it is autological. But if ‘heterological’ is autological, then since it is a word that does not describe itself, it is heterological. The common solution to this puzzle is that ‘heterological’, as defined by Grelling, is not a genuine predicate (Thomson 1962). In other words, “Is ‘heterological’ heterological?” is without meaning. There can be no predicate that applies to all and only those predicates it does not apply to for the same reason that there can be no barber who shaves all and only those people who do not shave themselves.
    ellauri096.html on line 153: The eliminativist, who thinks that ‘know’ or ‘justified’ is meaningless, will diagnose the epistemic paradoxes as questions that only appear to be well-formed. For instance, the eliminativist about justification would not accept proposition (4) in the regress paradox: ‘Some beliefs are justified’. His point is not that no beliefs meet the high standards for justification, as an anarchist might deny that any ostensible authorities meet the high standards for legitimacy. Instead, the eliminativist unromantically diagnoses ‘justified’ as a pathological term. Just as the astronomer ignores ‘Are there a zillion stars?’ on the grounds that ‘zillion’ is not a genuine numeral, the eliminativist ignores ‘Are some beliefs justified?’ on the grounds that ‘justified’ is not a genuine adjective.
    ellauri096.html on line 155: In the twentieth century, suspicions about conceptual pathology were strongest for the liar paradox: Is ‘This sentence is false’ true? Philosophers who thought that there was something deeply defective with the surprise test paradox assimilated it to the liar paradox. Let us review the assimilation process.
    ellauri096.html on line 157: The student’s overall conclusion, that the test is impossible, is also self-defeating. If the student believes his conclusion then he will not expect the test. So if he receives a test, it will be a surprise. The event will be all the more unexpected because the student has deluded himself into thinking the test is impossible.
    ellauri096.html on line 159: Just as someone’s awareness of a prediction can affect the likelihood of it being true, awareness of that sensitivity to his awareness can also affect its truth. If each cycle of awareness is self-defeating, then there is no stable resting place for a conclusion.
    ellauri096.html on line 163: Epistemic paradoxes affect decision theory because rational choices are based on beliefs and desires. If the agent cannot form a rational belief, it is difficult to interpret his behavior as a choice. The purpose of attributing beliefs and desires is to set up practical syllogisms that make sense of actions as means to ends. Subtracting rationality from the agent makes framework useless. Given this commitment to charitable interpretation, there is no possibility of your rationally choosing an option that you believe to be inferior. So if you choose, you cannot really believe you were operating as an anti-expert, that is, someone whose opinions on a topic are reliably wrong (Egan and Elga 2005).
    ellauri096.html on line 165: The medieval philosopher John Buridan (Sophismata, Sophism 13) gave a starkly minimal example of such instability:
    ellauri096.html on line 169: (K-3) Either the test is on Monday but you do not know it before Monday, or the test is on Wednesday but you do not know it before Wednesday, or the test is on Friday but you do not know it before Friday, or this announcement is known to be false.
    ellauri096.html on line 173: (K-0) This sentence is known to be false.
    ellauri096.html on line 178: to ∼Kp (that is, from ‘It is known that not-p’, to ‘It is not the case that it is known that p’). Ironically, this garbled transmission results in a cleaner variation of the knower:
    ellauri096.html on line 180: (K) No one knows this very sentence.
    ellauri096.html on line 184: The skeptic could hope to solve (K-0) by denying that anything is known. This remedy does not cure (K). If nothing is known then (K) is true. Can the skeptic instead challenge the premise that proving a proposition is sufficient for knowing it? This solution would be particularly embarrassing to the skeptic. The skeptic presents himself as a stickler for proof. If it turns out that even proof will not sway him, he bears a damning resemblance to the dogmatist he so frequently chides.
    ellauri096.html on line 186: But the skeptic should not lose his nerve. Proof does not always yield knowledge. Consider a student who correctly guesses that a step in his proof is valid. The student does not know the conclusion but did prove the theorem. His instructor might have trouble getting the student to understand why his answer constitutes a valid proof. The intransigence may stem from the prover’s intelligence rather than his stupidity. L. E. J. Brouwer is best known in mathematics for his brilliant fixed point theorem. But Brouwer regarded his proof as dubious. He had philosophical doubts about the Axiom of Choice and Law of Excluded Middle. Brouwer persuaded a minority of mathematicians and philosophers, known as intuitionists, to emulate his inability to be educated by non-constructive proofs.
    ellauri096.html on line 188: The logical myth that “You cannot prove a universal negative” is itself a universal negative. So it implies its own unprovability. This implication of unprovability is correct but only because the principle is false. For instance, exhaustive inspection proves the universal negative ‘No adverbs appear in this sentence’. A reductio ad absurdum proves the universal negative ‘There is no largest prime number’.
    ellauri096.html on line 191: Yes, there are infinitely many. Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorem demonstrated that any system that is strong enough to express arithmetic is also strong enough to express a formal counterpart of the self-referential proposition in the surprise test example ‘This statement cannot be proved in this system’. If the system cannot prove its “Gödel sentence”, then this sentence is true. If the system can prove its Gödel sentence, the system is inconsistent. So either the system is incomplete or inconsistent. (See the entry on Kurt Gödel.)
    ellauri096.html on line 193: Of course, this result concerns provability relative to a system. One system can prove another system’s Gödel sentence. Kurt Gödel (1983, 271) thought that proof was not needed for knowledge that arithmetic is consistent.
    ellauri096.html on line 195: J. R. Lucas (1964) claims that this reveals human beings are not machines. A computer is a concrete instantiation of a formal system. Hence, its “knowledge” is restricted to what it can prove. By Gödel’s theorem, the computer will be either inconsistent or incomplete. However, a human being with a full command of arithmetic can be consistent (even if he is actually inconsistent due to inattention or wishful thinking).
    ellauri096.html on line 197: Critics of Lucas defend the parity between people and computers. They think we have our own Gödel sentences (Lewis 1999, 166–173). In this egalitarian spirit, G. C. Nerlich (1961) models the student’s beliefs in the surprise test example as a logical system. The teacher’s announcement is then a Gödel sentence about the student: There will be a test next week but you will not be able to prove which day it will occur on the basis of this announcement and memory of what has happened on previous exam days. When the number of exam days equals zero the announcement is equivalent to sentence K.
    ellauri096.html on line 199: Several commentators on the surprise test paradox object that interpreting surprise as unprovability changes the topic. Instead of posing the surprise test paradox, it poses a variation of the liar paradox. Other concepts can be blended with the liar. For instance, mixing in alethic notions generates the possible liar: Is ‘This statement is possibly false’ true? (Post 1970) (If it is false, then it is false that it is possibly false. What cannot possibly be false is necessarily true. But if it is necessarily true, then it cannot be possibly false.) Since the semantic concept of validity involves the notion of possibility, one can also derive validity liars such as Pseudo-Scotus’ paradox: ‘Squares are squares, therefore, this argument is invalid’ (Read 1979). Suppose Pseudo-Scotus’ argument is valid. Since the premise is necessarily true, the conclusion would be necessarily true. But the conclusion contradicts the supposition that argument is valid. Therefore, by reductio, the argument is necessarily invalid. Wait! The argument can be invalid only if it is possible for the premise to be true and the conclusion to be false. But we have already proved that the conclusion of ‘Squares are squares, therefore, this argument is invalid’ is necessarily true. There is no consistent judgment of the argument’s validity. A similar predicament follows from ‘The test is on Friday but this prediction cannot be soundly deduced from this announcement’.
    ellauri096.html on line 201: One can mock up a complicated liar paradox that resembles the surprise test paradox. But this complex variant of the liar is not an epistemic paradox. For the paradoxes turn on the semantic concept of truth rather than an epistemic concept.
    ellauri096.html on line 204: Frederic Fitch (1963) reports that in 1945 he first learned of this proof of unknowable truths from a referee report on a manuscript he never published. Thanks to Joe Salerno’s (2009) archival research, we now know that referee was Alonzo Church.
    ellauri096.html on line 206: Assume there is a true sentence of the form ‘p but p is not known’. Although this sentence is consistent, modest principles of epistemic logic imply that sentences of this form are unknowable.
    ellauri096.html on line 225: But secular idealists and logical positivists concede that there are some actual unknown truths. How can they continue to believe that all truths are knowable? Astonishingly, these eminent philosophers seem refuted by a pinch of epistemic logic. Also injured are those who limit their claims of universal knowability to a limited domain. For instance, Immanuel Kant (A223/B272) asserts that all empirical propositions are knowable. This pocket of optimism would be enough to ignite the contradiction (Stephenson 2015).
    ellauri096.html on line 227: Timothy Williamson doubts that this casualty list is enough for the result to qualify as a paradox:
    ellauri096.html on line 233: Those who believe that the Church-Fitch result is a genuine paradox can respond to Williamson with paradoxes that accord with common sense (and science –and religious orthodoxy). For instance, common sense heartily agrees with the conclusion that something exists. But it is surprising that this can be proved without empirical premises. Since the quantifiers of standard logic (first order predicate logic with identity) have existential import, the logician can deduce that something exists from the principle that everything is identical to itself. Most philosophers balk at this simple proof because they feel that the existence of something cannot be proved by sheer logic. Likewise, many philosophers balk at the proof of unknowables because they feel that such a profound result cannot be obtained from such limited means.
    ellauri096.html on line 236: Church’s referee report was composed in 1945. The timing and structure of his argument for unknowables suggests that Church may have been by inspired G. E. Moore’s (1942, 543) sentence:
    ellauri096.html on line 240: Moore’s problem is to explain what is odd about declarative utterances such as (M). This explanation needs to encompass both readings of (M): ‘p&B∼p
    ellauri096.html on line 243: ’. (This scope ambiguity is exploited by a popular joke: René Descartes sits in a bar, having a drink. The bartender asks him if he would care for another. “I think not,” he says, and disappears.)
    ellauri096.html on line 247: There is no problem with third person counterparts of (M). Anyone else can say about Moore, with no paradox, ‘G. E. Moore went to the pictures last Tuesday but he does not believe it’. (M) can also be embedded unparadoxically in conditionals: ‘If I went to the pictures last Tuesday but I do not believe it, then I am suffering from a worrisome lapse of memory ’. The past tense is fine: ‘I went to the picture shows last Tuesday but I did not believe it’. The future tense, ‘I went to the picture shows last Tuesday but I will not believe it’, is a bit more of a stretch (Bovens 1995). We tend to picture our future selves as better informed. Later selves are, as it were, experts to whom earlier selves should defer. When an earlier self foresees that his later self believes p
    ellauri096.html on line 249: . Bas van Fraassen (1984, 244) dubs this “the principle of reflection”: I ought to believe a proposition given that I will believe it at some future time.
    ellauri096.html on line 251: Robert Binkley (1968) anticipates van Fraassen by applying the reflection principle to the surprise test paradox. The student can foresee that he will not believe the announcement if no test is given by Thursday. The conjunction of the history of testless days and the announcement will imply the Moorean sentence:
    ellauri096.html on line 255: Since the less evident member of the conjunction is the announcement, the student will choose not to believe the announcement. At the beginning of the week, the student foresees that his future self may not believe the announcement. So the student on Sunday will not believe the announcement when it is first uttered.
    ellauri096.html on line 257: Binkley illuminates this reasoning with doxastic logic. The inference rules for this logic of belief can be understood as idealizing the student into an ideal reasoner. In general terms, an ideal reasoner is someone who infers what he ought and refrains from inferring any more than he ought. Since there is no constraint on his premises, we may disagree with the ideal reasoner. But if we agree with the ideal reasoner’s premises, we appear bound to agree with his conclusion. Binkley specifies some requirements to give teeth to the student’s status as an ideal reasoner: the student is perfectly consistent, believes all the logical consequences of his beliefs, and does not forget. Binkley further assumes that the ideal reasoner is aware that he is an ideal reasoner. According to Binkley, this ensures that if the ideal reasoner believes p, then he believes that he will believe p thereafter.
    ellauri096.html on line 259: Binkley’s account of the student’s hypothetical epistemic state on Thursday is compelling. But his argument for spreading the incredulity from the future to the past is open to three challenges.
    ellauri096.html on line 269: Binkley stipulates that the students do not forget. He needs to add that the students know that they will not forget. For the mere threat of a memory lapse sometimes suffices to undermine knowledge. Consider Professor Anesthesiology’s scheme for surprise tests: “A surprise test will be given either Wednesday or Friday with the help of an amnesia drug. If the test occurs on Wednesday, then the drug will be administered five minutes after Wednesday’s class. The drug will instantly erase memory of the test and the students will fill in the gap by confabulation.” You have just completed Wednesday’s class and so temporarily know that the test will be on Friday. Ten minutes after the class, you lose this knowledge. No drug was administered and there is nothing wrong with your memory. You are correctly remembering that no test was given on Wednesday. However, you do not know your memory is accurate because you also know that if the test was given Wednesday then you would have a pseudo-memory indistinguishable from your present memory. Despite not gaining any new evidence, you change your mind about the test occurring on Wednesday and lose your knowledge that the test is on Friday. (The change of belief is not crucial; you would still lack foreknowledge of the test even if you dogmatically persisted in believing that the test will be on Friday.)
    ellauri096.html on line 271: If the students know that they will not forget and know there will be no undermining by outside evidence, then we may be inclined to agree with Binkley’s summary that his idealized student never loses the knowledge he accumulates. As we shall see, however, this overlooks other ways in which rational agents may lose knowledge.
    ellauri096.html on line 275: The points made so far suggest a solution to the surprise test paradox (Sorensen 1988, 328–343). As Binkley (1968) asserts, the test would be a surprise even if the teacher waited until the last day. Yet it can still be true that the teacher’s announcement is informative. At the beginning of the week, the students are justified in believing the teacher’s announcement that there will be a surprise test. This announcement is equivalent to:
    ellauri096.html on line 285: This solution makes who you are relevant to what you can know. In addition to compromising the impersonality of knowledge, there will be compromise on its temporal neutrality.
    ellauri096.html on line 291: When on trial for impiety, Socrates traced his inquisitiveness to the Oracle at Delphi (Apology 21d in Cooper 1997). Prior to beginning his mission of inquiry, Chaerephon asked the Oracle: “Who is the wisest of men?” The Oracle answered “No one is wiser than Socrates.” This astounded Socrates because he believed he knew nothing. Whereas a less pious philosopher might have questioned the reliability of the Delphic Oracle, Socrates followed the general practice of treating the Oracle as infallible. The only cogitation appropriate to an infallible answer is interpretation. Accordingly, Socrates resolved his puzzlement by inferring that his wisdom lay in recognizing his own ignorance. While others may know nothing, Socrates knows that he knows nothing.
    ellauri096.html on line 293: Socrates continues to be praised for his insight. But his “discovery” is a contradiction. If Socrates knows that he knows nothing, then he knows something (the proposition that he knows nothing) and yet does not know anything (because knowledge implies truth).
    ellauri096.html on line 295: Socrates could regain consistency by downgrading his meta-knowledge to the status of a belief. If he believes he knows nothing, then he naturally wishes to remedy his ignorance by asking about everything. This rationale is accepted throughout the early dialogues. But when we reach the Meno, one of his interlocutors has an epiphany. After Meno receives the standard treatment from Socrates about the nature of virtue, Meno discerns a conflict between Socratic ignorance and Socratic inquiry (Meno 80d, in Cooper 1997). How would Socrates recognize the correct answer even if Meno gave it?
    ellauri096.html on line 299: Saul Kripke’s ruminations on the surprise test paradox led him to a paradox about dogmatism. He lectured on both paradoxes at Cambridge University to the Moral Sciences Club in 1972. (A descendent of this lecture now appears as Kripke 2011). Gilbert Harman transmitted Kripke’s new paradox as follows:
    ellauri096.html on line 305: Dogmatists accept this reasoning. For them, knowledge closes inquiry. Any “evidence” that conflicts with what is known can be dismissed as misleading evidence. Forewarned is forearmed.
    ellauri096.html on line 388: Jumalan valtiossa Augustinus puolusti näkemystä, jota kutsuttaisiin nykyään nuoren maan kreationismiksi. Hän hylkäsi sekä pakanoiden ehdottaman ajatuksen ihmissuvun kuolemattomuudesta että joidenkin hänen aikansa kreikkalaisten ja egyptiläisten näkemykset aikakausista, koska ne erosivat kirkon pyhistä kirjoituksista:
    ellauri096.html on line 390: »Jättäkäämme siis niiden arvailut, jotka eivät tiedä mitä sanovat, kun he puhuvat ihmisrodun luonnosta ja alkuperästä. Sillä jotkut katsovat ihmisistä samaa mitä he katsovat maailmasta itsestään, eli että ne ovat aina olleet olemassa [...] Heitä ovat eksyttäneet myös ne hyvin valheelliset kirjoitukset, jotka väittävät historian olevan monituhatvuotinen, vaikka pyhistä kirjoituksista luemme, ettei kuuttatuhatta vuotta ole vielä kulunut.»
    ellauri096.html on line 422: This article about a painter is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
    ellauri096.html on line 436: Juotikas ei pidä parrakkaista setämiehistä, se haluis lyödä niitä lättyyn mutta käsi herpoaa kuin pahassa unessa. Aivan heteronormaalia pogonofobiaa.
    ellauri096.html on line 450: Juotikas hapantelee aika pahasti heppagenrestä. Sitä vituttaa että esiteinit lukee niitä eikä Juotikasta. Siellä liikkuu löysä raha joka saisi mielellään hakeutua nupipään pehmyreiden taskuihin. No ylläri, jos saa valita söpön raudikon tai kaljupään kakantuhriman hasbeenin välillä, niin mitä luulet että valizee? Mäkin luen mieluummin heppahullua kun näitä Jaskan tuherruxia. "Esimerkixi" fantasia ja 'spefi' ovat aina "sallineet paljon tilaa luovalle mielikuvituxelle ja omaperäiselle sanankäytölle". Mitä helvettiä, ei aina samoina toistuvien mielikuvituxettomien satueläinten ja typerien neologismien kexaseminen vaadi kovin kummallista neroa. Ne on vähintään yhtä klisheisiä kuin heppakirjat, klisheet on vaan toisia, enempi tollasia "poikien". Esim Game of thrones on vaan fantasiasaippua. Se knääpiö oli paras. Oli se helmimäisen ahistunut prinsessakin kiva jolla oli lemmikeitä. Helmi haluis ehkä kisun. Avantgarden 2-tahtimekanismia: ensin se maistuu pahalta ja sitten se alkaa maistua - yhä pahalta. Paha yskä ja yhä pahenee.
    ellauri096.html on line 567: Eräässä Ikoskan toisessa teoxessa naismainen "Lauri" ei ollutkaan homo vaan sarjaraiskaaja. "Lukija" eli "Anu" pettyi odotuxissa. Naismaisenhan pitäis olla Weibling. Todennäköisesti "Lauri" oli myös sarrjayrittäjä. Raiskauskin jäi yrityxexi kun se ei yrittänyt miehekkäämmin. Auktorisoitu peetee Aki Manninen ei ois antanut löylykauhan tulla onnen esteexi. Ei löylykauhalla voi edes lyödä kovaa muuta kuin löylyä. Paizi jos se on Haju Pisilän käsintekemä. Kyllä lessu aina jonkun lässyn lissun litistää tai kääntäen. Androgyyni "Lauri" ei ollutkaan katamaraani. Tai siis katamiitti. Katamiitti on etruskilainen Ganymedes, an attractive Trojan boy supposedly abducted to Mount Olympus by the god Zeus to become his cupbearer and lover.
    ellauri096.html on line 569: Naismaisen Mänlin iskä kazoi myös Keazin maalaismaisemaa Hampstead Heathissa ja ymmärsi. Mutta niin teki naismainen Mänli izekin. It takes all kinds to make a world.
    ellauri096.html on line 599: "It is not right that everyone should read the pages which follow; only a few will be able to savour this bitter fruit with impunity. Consequently, shrinking soul, turn on your heels and go back before penetrating further into such uncharted, perilous wastelands." — Maldoror, Part I, Chapter 1.
    ellauri096.html on line 637: Arvioinnit, eli tietynlaisten rationaalisten kehysten kautta muodostetut näkemykset toimenpiteiden vaikutuksista ovat hallintamentaliteetin näkökulmasta keskeisiä käytäntöjä. Tutkielman tutkimuskysymyksinä on 1) miten Kooma-malli voi olla mahdollinen ja 2) minkälaisia ristiriitoja tähän mahdollisuuteen liittyy. Kysymyksiin vastataan tarkastelemalla ensinnäkin hallintamentalisoitumisen historiaa, jonka kautta makrotaloustieteen muodostuminen on sijoitettu osaksi laajempaa länsimaista hallinnallistumisen tendenssiä. Tutkielmassa laaditaan kriittinen rekonstruktio makrotalousteorian ja siihen kytkeytyvien käytäntöjen syntyhistoriasta ja polveutumisesta sekä siinä ilmaantuneista erilaisista problematisoinneista. Tämän kautta Kooma-malli asetetaan laajempaan sitä mahdollistavaan historialliseen talousteoreettiseen ja teknologiseen kontekstiin. Tästä näkökulmasta tutkielmassa tarkastellaan miten Kooma-malli 'on tullut jostain' erilaisten makrotaloustieteellisten ilmaantumisten myötävaikutuksesta.
    ellauri096.html on line 639: Kooma-mallia tarkastellaan kriittisen historiallisen rekonstruktion ohella luomalla katsaus sen talousteoreettisiin taustaoletuksiin. Taustaoletukset konstituoivat mallissa ilmeneviä tapoja hahmottaa taloudellista toimijuutta sekä taloudellisten suureiden välisiä suhteita ja niissä vallitsevia prosesseja. Taustaoletusten osalta tutkielmassa kiinnitetään erityistä huomiota niissä vallitseviin epävarmuuksiin ja ristiriitaisuuksiin. Esimerkkeinä talousteoreettisista taustaoletuksista tutkielmassa analysoidaan finanssipolitiikan kerroinvaikutuksia, mallien mikroperustaisuutta, rationaalisten odotusten hypoteesia sekä siihen kytkeytyvää ricardolaisen ekvivalenssin teoreemaa. Analyysissa näihin taustaoletuksiin todetaan sisältyvän epävarmuuksia ja ristiriitaisuuksia, jotka liittyvät esimerkiksi finanssipolitiikan kerroinvaikutusten empiirisen tulkinnan tulkinnan vaikeuteen sekä ricardolaisen ekvivalenssin realistisuuteen taloudellisten toimijoiden käyttäytymistä kuvaavana teoreemana.
    ellauri096.html on line 641: Tutkielman keskeisenä tarkoituksena on tuoda esille Kooma-mallia konstituoivien teoreettisten taustaoletusten syntyhistoriaa ja niihin kytkeytyviä tiedollisia epävarmuuksia ja ristiriitaisuuksia. Valtiovarainministeriössä laadituissa aineistoissa ei olla lainkaan käsitelty Kooma-mallin teoreettiseen taustaoletuksiin liittyviä epävarmuuksia tai yleensä reflektoitu Kooma-mallin avulla laaditun tiedon varmuusastetta. Tutkielmassa on Kooma-mallin olemassaolon mahdollisuuksien genealogisen tarkastelun kautta horjutettu Kooma-mallin avulla laadittujen laskelmien itsestäänselvää, neutraalia tai luonnollista ulkokuorta tuomalla esille niissä piileviä ristiriitaisuuksia ja epävarmuuksia.
    ellauri096.html on line 670: In a 1976 paper, Robert Lucas argued that it is naive to try to predict the effects of a change in economic policy entirely on the basis of relationships observed in historical data, especially highly aggregated historical data. Lucas claimed that the decision rules of Keynesian models, such as the fiscal multiplier, cannot be considered as structural, in the sense that they cannot be invariant with respect to changes in government policy variables, stating:
    ellauri096.html on line 674: This meant that, because the parameters of the models were not structural, i.e. not indifferent to policy, they would necessarily change whenever policy was changed. The so-called Lucas critique followed similar criticism undertaken earlier by Ragnar Frisch, in his critique of Jan Tinbergen's 1939 book Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories, where Frisch accused Tinbergen of not having discovered autonomous relations, but "coflux" relations,[10] and by Jacob Marschak, in his 1953 contribution to the Cowles Commission Monograph, where he submitted that
    ellauri096.html on line 757: Vaan eivät ole mieltänostattavia kirjan muutkaan oheistapahtumat. Pari henkeä murhataan, 1 viiltelee izeään, 2. sokeutuu, ja useampikin askartelee ilmeisen kyseenalaisissa puuhissa. Kaiken muun ohella taustalla vilahtelee mystinen Seriator vilistellen nurkissa kuin scifileffan Alien, joka vihjeiden perusteella lienee todellinen pahuuden ilmentymä. Eikä ihme, se on rakennuttaja.
    ellauri096.html on line 775: In the dialogue Protagoras, Socrates attests that akrasia does not exist, claiming "No one goes willingly toward the bad" (358d). If a person examines a situation and decides to act in the way he determines to be best, he will pursue this action, as the best course is also the good course, i.e. man's natural goal. An all-things-considered assessment of the situation will bring full knowledge of a decision's outcome and worth linked to well-developed principles of the good. A person, according to Socrates, never chooses to act poorly or against his better judgment; and, therefore, actions that go against what is best are simply a product of being ignorant of facts or knowledge of what is best or good.
    ellauri096.html on line 777: Aristotle, on the other hand, took a more empirical approach to the question, acknowledging that we intuitively believe in akrasia. He distances himself from the Socratic position by locating the breakdown of reasoning in an agent’s opinion, not his appetition. Now, without recourse to appetitive desires, Aristotle reasons that akrasia occurs as a result of opinion. Opinion is formulated mentally in a way that may or may not imitate truth, while appetites are merely desires of the body. Thus, opinion is only incidentally aligned with or opposed to the good, making an akratic action the product of opinion instead of reason. For Aristotle, the antonym of akrasia is enkrateia, which means "in power" (over oneself).
    ellauri096.html on line 792: Jeffrey EpsteinGhislaine Maxwell
    ellauri096.html on line 806: In Piaget´s theory of cognitive development, the third stage is called the Concrete Operational Stage. During this stage, which occurs from age 7-12, the child shows increased use of logic or reasoning. One of the important processes that develops is that of Seriation, which refers to the ability to sort objects or situations according to any characteristic, such as size, color, shape, or type. For example, the child would be able to look at his plate of mixed vegetables and eat everything except the brussels sprouts.
    ellauri096.html on line 808: The term seriation [mise en série] was proposed for use in semiotics by Jean Molino and derived from classical philology. Seriation "invokes the idea that any investigator, in order to assign some plausible meaning to a given phenomenon, must interpret it within a series of comparable phenomena." One cannot interpret what philology calls a hapax; that is, an isolated phenomenon. Art historian Erwin Panofsky has explained the situation in very clear terms:
    ellauri096.html on line 810: "Whether we deal with historical or natural phenomena, the individual observation of phenomena assumes the character of a 'fact' only when it can be related to other, analogous observations in such a way that the whole series 'makes sense.' This 'sense' is, therefore, fully capable of being applied, as a control, to the interpretation of a new individual observation within the same range of phenomena. If, however, this new individual observation definitely refuses to be interpreted according to the 'sense' of the series, and if an error proves to be impossible, the 'sense' of the series will have to be reformulated to include the new individual observation (1955, p. 35)" (1990, pp. 230–231).
    ellauri096.html on line 826: Pulla oli ranskalaisen kulttuurin tuntija kuten aluepäämajan arvostama Juha Tanttu, eli söi ranskanpastilleja. ja hän kirjoitti myös Ranskaan sijoittuvia historiallisia romaaneja. Hän myös kirjoitti pakinoita Lipeäkalaan. Nimimerkillä Porokka hän pakinoi yli 30 vuotta Uudessa Suomessa. Kaikkiaan hän kirjoitti noin 80 kirjaa ja lisäksi erilaisia pieniä painotuotteita.
    ellauri096.html on line 836: "Anu" moitiskelee Ikoskan henkilöitä pahvisuudesta. Siinä musta pata kyllä soimaa kattilaa. Jaskan kirjoissa ei ole yhtään oikeata henkilöä, kaikki tapahtumat leijuu painottomina kirjoittajan solipsistisessä päässä. Varjokuvat haahuilee kuin barbinuket Krisse Salmisen skezissä: sit tää menis tänne murjottamaan ja tää sanois sille et mua ahistaa. Tää kohta "Anun" tajunnanvirrasta kuulostaa omakohtaisesti koetulta:
    ellauri096.html on line 841: Televisio kamarimusisoi olohuoneessa. Aiti ja lina katselivat äänistä päätellen historiallista pukudraamaa. Koska meneillään ei ollut mikään hälyisä kotimainen huumoriohjelma eikä visailu, Anun ei tarvinnut sulkea huoneensa ovea. Aänimaisema ymparoi häntä herttaisena kukkatapettina. Isä puuhaili jotain kellarin verstashuoneessa. Veti käteen varmasti. Arpajaisista voitettu norppaherätyskello näytti [mitä näytti].
    ellauri096.html on line 867: Moni historian maalimies harrasti nuorena mensuurimeikkailua. Heidän joukossaan oli muun muassa kommunismin isä Karl Marx. Yhteiskuntafilosofi Karl Marxilla (1818–1883) oli vasemman silmänsä yläpuolella mensuuri­meikkailuottelussa Bonnin yliopistossa saatu arpi. Sekin oli muuten juutalaisia. Kainin merkkiä kantoivat Heikin kaa. Saksalainen säveltäjä Richard Wagner (1813–1883) saattoi sekin olla jutku tuntemattomaxi jääneen isän puolelta. Se oli innokas miekkailija opiskeluaikoinaan Leipzigissä, missä hän kuului yliopiston Saksikäsi-osakuntaan. Natsijohtaja Ernst Kaltenbrunner (1903–1946) tunnettiin julmuudestaan. Hänellä oli kasvoissaan useita mensuuriotteluista saatuja arpia ja useampia Victorinox-linkkuveizistä saatuja peräpuolella. Hullu filosofi Friedrich ­Nietzsche (1844–1900) opiskeli Bonnin yliopistossa teologiaa ja kuului Francofobia-osakuntaan. Hän keskeytti opintonsa vuoden jälkeen ja vaihtoi kielitieteeseen. Tanskalainen tähtitieteilijä Tyko Brahe (1546–1601) menetti nenänsä miekkataistelussa Rostockin yliopistossa. Syynä oli aivan mahdoton tunarointi. Silitysrautakansleri Otto von Bismarck (1815–1898) oli innokas miekkailija Göttingenin yliopistossa, missä sillä meni paremmin meikkailusalilla kuin luennoilla. Autotehtailija Ferdinand Porsche (1875–1951) opiskeli Wienissä ja miekkaili osakuntansa Bruna Bröder edustajana.
    ellauri096.html on line 875: Koska menstruaatiomeikkailun keskeinen ajatus oli kuukausittainen kunnaan suomustaminen, kaxintaistelua piti edeltää loukkaus. Mikä tahansa tölväisy ei kuitenkaan kelvannut syyksi. Esimerkiksi läimäystä persauxiin pidettiin pätevänä syynä kaksintaisteluun, ja myös toisen älyn vähättely oli oiva keino saada kutsu osakunnan meikkailusaliin. ”Dummkopf” oli yleinen solvaus, ja myös toisen nimittäminen aasiksi ("Esel") johti yleensä toivottuun lopputulokseen. Ennen taistelua loukkaus piti kuitenkin hyväksyttää osakunnan kunniakomiteassa. Vaatimus loukkauksesta aiheutti joskus ongelmia. Monien osakuntien säännöt vaativat, että niiden jäsenten piti osallistua vähintään kahteen otteluun lukukaudessa. Rauhallisten opiskelijoiden oli kuitenkin usein vaikea haalia riittävästi loukkauksia, ja vuonna 1850 osakunnat alkoivatkin loukata väpelöitä ihan tarkoituxella: "Weiblicher! Virilisierter Mannling! Rotzlöffel! Nichtssagender Furz!!" Meikkailuotteluita järjestettiin sunnuntaisin aamukuudesta iltamyöhään sovitussa ­paikassa kaupungin laidalla. Puuttuvista loukkauksista aiheuvat ongelmat ratkaisiin potkuilla persauxiin, mutta miekkailijoiden pelkoja ne eivät lievittäneet, päinvastoin pahensivat. Paukantit rauhoittivatkin usein hermojaan konjakilla ja pervitiinillä. Ottelun jälkeen pelko ja jännitys palkittiin: nuorukaiset, joilla oli jossain komeita mensisarpia, herättivät muissa miehissä kiinnostusta ja saivat niiden sydämen pamppailemaan. Veri virtasi paisuvaisissa, kun saksalaiset opiskelijat mittelivät pippeleitään.
    ellauri096.html on line 884: Vuonna 1871 Saksan pikkuvaltiot yhdistyivät keisarikunnaksi, jota hallitsi Bonnin yliopistossa hankittua menstruaatioarpea kasvoissaan kantava Vilhelm I. Keisari uskoi vakaasti, että osakuntaelämä jätti arpia miehiin ja menstruaatioarvet tekivät näistä ”lujia ja urheita”, tai ainakin sööttejä. Hänen mielestään mensuurimeikkailun idea oli ymmärretty täysin väärin. Keisarista se oli nykyajan vastine keskiaikaisille hirttäjäisille ja antoi ”juuri sitä supervoimaa, jota yliopiston jälkeen elämässä tarvittiin”. Vilhelm uskoi myös löytävänsä armeijaansa kenraalit entisten "Seelenbruderiensa" joukosta. Keisarin järkytykseksi hänen arpiset kenraalinsa kuitenkin johtivat Saksan katkeraan tappioon ensimmäisessä maailmansodassa vuonna 1918. Täh? Nyt lähti heittelehtimään. Vilhelm I (1797-1888) oli autuaasti kuollut ja kuopattu. Suuren sodan tappiokeisari oli 2 keisaria myöhempi Vilhelm II (1859–1941). On tässäkin historiasivusto. Samaa luokkaa kuin Tiede 2000-kuvasto.
    ellauri096.html on line 907: Elikkä en voi tehdä mitään ize koska sillä minkä teen on kausaalinen selitys. Muze on ajatusvirhe. Monimutkainen vaste monimutkaiseen ympäristöön voi näyttää ennustamattomalta ja yhdessä sanan merkityxistä onkin sitä, muze voi silti olla hyvin motivoitua jopa determinististä kun sen oikein ymmärtää. Se et toteuttaa totunnaisia malleja tai roolikuvia omasta halusta ei ole epävapaata Aristoteleen mielestä. Mikä onkin ainoo järkeenkäypä määritelmä tahdonvapaudelle. Paljon hullumpi on tollanen pakko-oireinen joka alkaa toistaa jotain sijaistoimintoa pakkoliikkeenä vaan vähentääxeen ahistusta. Sitä askeesi näät on. Ilottomia viikoittain samanlaisina toistuvia harjoituxia.
    ellauri097.html on line 65: As a scholar, Mencken is known for The American Language, a multi-volume study of how the English language is spoken in the United States. As an admirer of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, he was an outspoken opponent of organized religion, theism, populism, and representative democracy, the last of which he viewed as a system in which inferior men dominated their superiors. Mencken was a supporter of scientific progress though he couldn´t find his arse with both hands. He was critical of osteopathy and chiropractic. He was also an open critic of economics. In a word: a royal pain in the ass.
    ellauri097.html on line 79: Baltimoren asema vientisatamana toipui vapaussodan jälkeen ja sen kautta vietiin viljaa etenkin Etelä-Amerikkaan. Ensimmäinen rautatie tuli kaupunkiin vuonna 1828. Vuonna 1851 kaupunki erotettiin Baltimoren piirikunnasta itsenäiseksi kaupungiksi. Yhdysvaltain sisällissodan aikana 1860-luvulla Maryland oli osa Pohjoisvaltioita, mutta monet paikalliset kannattivat Etelävaltioita. Yhtä sekopäitä kuin Menckenkin. Kaupungilla on ollut myös ongelmia poliisin ja etenkin kaupungin mustan väestönosan jännitteiden johdosta. Esimerkiksi vuonna 2015 kaupungissa mellakoitiin mustan miehen kuoltua valkoisen poliisin pidättämänä kuljetuksen aikana. Samaan aikaan esimerkiksi murhien määrä on ollut historiallisen korkealla. Neljäsosa porukoista elää köyhyysrajan alapuolella. Sinnittelee vähäosaisina kuin Gilmoren tytöt. Kaxi kolmesta asukista on mustanpuhuvia.
    ellauri097.html on line 91: In early 1898 he took a writing class at the Cosmopolitan University. This was to be the entirety of Mencken´s formal education in journalism, or in any other subject.
    ellauri097.html on line 95: Mencken admired the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (he was the first writer to provide a scholarly analysis in English of Nietzsche´s views and writings) and Joseph Conrad. His humor and satire owed much to Ambrose Bierce and Mark Twain. He did much to defend Dreiser despite freely admitting his faults, including stating forthrightly that Dreiser often wrote badly and was a gullible man. Mencken also expressed his appreciation for William Graham Sumner in a 1941 collection of Sumner´s essays and regretted never having known Sumner personally. In contrast, Mencken was scathing in his criticism of the German philosopher Hans Vaihinger, whom he described as "an extremely dull author" and whose famous book Philosophy of 'Als ob' he dismissed as an unimportant "foot-note to all existing systems."
    ellauri097.html on line 101: Mencken was a keen cheerleader of scientific progress but was skeptical of economic theories and strongly opposed to osteopathic/chiropractic medicine. He also debunked the idea of objective news reporting since "truth is a commodity that the masses of undifferentiated men cannot be induced to buy" and added a humorous description of how "Homo Boobus," like "higher mammalia," is moved by "whatever gratifies his prevailing yearnings."
    ellauri097.html on line 103: Such turns of phrase evoked the erudite cynicism and rapier sharpness of language displayed by Ambrose Bierce in his darkly-satiric The Devil's Dictionary. A noted curmudgeon, democratic in subjects attacked, Mencken savaged politics, hypocrisy, and social convention. A master of English, he was given to bombast and once disdained the lowly hot dog bun's descent into "the soggy rolls prevailing today, of ground acorns, plaster of Paris, flecks of bath sponge and atmospheric air all compact."
    ellauri097.html on line 107: Like Nietzsche, he also lambasted religious belief and the very concept of Cod, as Mencken was an unflinching atheist, particularly Christian fundamentalism, Christian Science and creationism, and against the "Booboisie," his word for the ignorant middle classes. In the summer of 1925, he attended the famous Scopes "Monkey Trial" in Dayton, Tennessee, and wrote scathing columns for the Baltimore Sun (widely syndicated) and American Mercury mocking the anti-evolution Fundamentalists (especially William Jennings Bryan). The play Inherit the Wind is a fictionalized version of the trial, and as noted above the cynical reporter E.K. Hornbeck is based on Mencken. In 1926, he deliberately had himself arrested for selling an issue of The American Mercury, which was banned in Boston by the Comstock laws. Mencken heaped scorn not only on the public officials he disliked but also on the state of American elective politics itself.
    ellauri097.html on line 109: In his 1918 introduction to Nietzsche´s The Anti-Christ Mencken wrote "The case against the Jews is long and damning; it would justify ten thousand times as many pogroms as now go on in the world."
    ellauri097.html on line 113: In the summer of 1926, Mencken followed with great interest the Los Angeles grand jury inquiry into the famous Canadian-American evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson. She was accused of faking her reported kidnapping and the case attracted national attention. There was every expectation that Mencken would continue his previous pattern of anti-fundamentalist articles, this time with a searing critique of McPherson. Unexpectedly, he came to her defense by identifying various local religious and civic groups that were using the case as an opportunity to pursue their respective ideological agendas against the embattled Pentecostal minister. He spent several weeks in Hollywood, California, and wrote many scathing and satirical columns on the movie industry and Southern California culture. After all charges had been dropped against McPherson, Mencken revisited the case in 1930 with a sarcastic and observant article. He wrote that since many of that town´s residents had acquired their ideas "of the true, the good and the beautiful" from the movies and newspapers, "Los Angeles will remember the testimony against her long after it forgets the testimony that cleared her."
    ellauri097.html on line 130: Uuskantilainen Vaihinger began to develop a system of philosophy he called the "philosophy of 'als ob' ". In it he offered a system of thought in which God and reality might best be represented as paradigms. This was not to say that either God or reality was any less certain than anything else in the realm of man’s awareness, but only that all matters confronting man might best be regarded in hypothetical ways.
    ellauri097.html on line 134: the American journalist Mencken was scathing in his criticism of the book, which he dismissed as an unimportant "foot-note to all existing systems". Vaihinger was also criticised by the Logical positivists who made "curt and disparaging references" to his work.
    ellauri097.html on line 136: In 1989, per his instructions, Alfred A. Knopf published Mencken's "secret diary" as The Diary of H. L. Mencken. According to an Associated Press story, Mencken's views shocked even the sympathetic scholar who edited it.
    ellauri097.html on line 143: I admit freely enough that, by careful breeding, supervision of environment and education, extending over many generations, it might be possible to make an appreciable improvement in the stock of the American Negro, for example, but I must maintain that this enterprise would be a ridiculous waste of energy, for there is a high-caste white stock ready at hand, and it is inconceivable that the Negro stock, however carefully it might be nurtured, could ever even remotely approach it. The educated Negro of today is a failure, not because he meets insuperable difficulties in life, but because he is a Negro. He is, in brief, a low-caste man, to the manner born, and he will remain inert and inefficient until fifty generations of him have lived in civilization. And even then, the superior white race will be fifty generations ahead of him.
    ellauri097.html on line 147: Mencken countered the arguments for Anglo-Saxon superiority prevalent in his time in a 1923 essay entitled "The Anglo-Saxon," which argued that if there was such a thing as a pure "Anglo-Saxon" race, it was defined by its inferiority and cowardice. "The normal American of the 'pure-blooded' majority goes to rest every night with an uneasy feeling that there is a burglar under the bed and he gets up every morning with a sickening fear that his underwear has been stolen."
    ellauri097.html on line 149: Mencken repeatedly identified mathematics with metaphysics and theology. According to Mencken, mathematics is necessarily infected with metaphysics because of the tendency of many mathematical people to engage in metaphysical speculation. In a review of Alfred North Whitehead's The Aims of Education, Mencken remarked that, while he agreed with Whitehead's thesis and admired his writing style, "now and then he falls into mathematical jargon and pollutes his discourse with equations," and "[t]here are moments when he seems to be following some of his mathematical colleagues into the gaudy metaphysics which now entertains them."[50] For Mencken, theology is characterized by the fact that it uses correct reasoning from false premises. Mencken also uses the term "theology" more generally, to refer to the use of logic in science or any other field of knowledge. In a review for both Arthur Eddington's The Nature of the Physical World and Joseph Needham's Man a Machine, Mencken ridiculed the use of reasoning to establish any fact in science, because theologians happen to be masters of "logic" and yet are mental defectives:
    ellauri097.html on line 161: [Physicists] have, in late years, made a great deal of progress, though it has been accompanied by a considerable quackery. Some of the notions which they now try to foist upon the world, especially in the astronomical realm and about the atom, are obviously nonsensical, and will soon go the way of all unsupported speculations. But there is nothing intrinsically insoluble about the problems they mainly struggle with, and soon or late really competent physicists will arise to solve them. These really competent physicists, I predict, will be too busy in their laboratories to give any time to either metaphysics or theology. Both are eternal enemies of every variety of sound thinking, and no man can traffic with them without losing something of his good judgment.
    ellauri097.html on line 163: Mencken ridiculed Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, believing that "in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of [Franz Josef] Gall and [Johann] Spurzheim." In his private letters, he said:
    ellauri097.html on line 165: It is a well known fact that physicists are greatly given to the supernatural. Why this should be I don't know, but the fact is plain. One of the most absurd of all spiritualists is Sir Oliver Lodge. I have the suspicion that the cause may be that physics itself, as currently practised, is largely moonshine. Certainly there is a great deal of highly dubious stuff in the work of such men as Eddington.
    ellauri097.html on line 167: His later work consisted of humorous, anecdotal, and nostalgic essays that were first published in The New Yorker and then collected in the books Happy Days, Newspaper Days, and Heathen Days. Mencken was preoccupied with his legacy and kept his papers, letters, newspaper clippings, columns, and even grade school report cards. After his death, those materials were made available to scholars in stages in 1971, 1981, and 1991 and include hundreds of thousands of letters sent and received. The only omissions were strictly personal letters received from women.
    ellauri097.html on line 193: Koejärjestelyxi ne ehdottavat sarvipäiden genosidiä (Hitler & Mengele 1942). Tämän jälkeen mitattaisiin kuinka iso osa puupellosta sitten häviää niiden pannahisten nieluun. Hypoteesi on että huomattavasti vähempi. Ällöttävät hirvikärpäsetkin voisivat vähetä. Petoja ei kyllä siedä lisätä yhtään, johan meitä on täällä yli 5 miljoonaa.
    ellauri097.html on line 292: Patrick White (1912–1990) was raised in Sydney’s well-to-do Rushcutter’s Bay, and was sent to England at 13. He attended boarding school, then Cambridge, and during the war was stationed in North Africa. It was there, in 1941, that White met Manoly Lascaris, the Greek officer who he would love for the rest of his life. By the time White and Lascaris returned to Australia. in 1947 White had written three tepidly received novels, and a play. It took coming home to Sydney to transform his writing and elevate it to the level of genius. White produced The Tree of Man, in 1955, his first novel to be written in Sydney. He went on to write a string of masterpieces in quick succession: Voss, Riders in the Chariot, The Vivisector. He received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1973. The Nobel committee credited White “for an epic and psychological narrative art which has introduced a new continent into literature.”
    ellauri097.html on line 296: He became a literary icon, but White knew that people rarely actually read his work. He professed not to care what people thought, but he would sometimes check for copies of his novels in local libraries. He would search for dog-ears and stains, to gauge how far in the book they had read. Most people, he deduced, never finished. The Australian reading public never quite warmed to White, and nothing much has changed. My grandmother “couldn’t stand him.” I have seen my mother take up one of his novels—The Solid Mandala—and after a few moments quite literally toss it aside. White’s books are metaphysical, lyrical, high modernist, full of baroque descriptions of landscapes, and unsparing in his examination of the people who live in them. For a country besotted with kitchen-sink realism and plain-speaking larrikins, Patrick White was baffling.
    ellauri097.html on line 298: In 2006, the Weekend Australian newspaper conducted an experiment. They submitted chapter three of The Eye of the Storm (1973) to twelve publishers and agents around Australia under an anagram of White’s name, Wraith Picket. Nobody offered to publish the book. One responded, “the sample chapter, while reply (sic) with energy and feeling, does not give evidence that the work is yet of a publishable quality.” Notwithstanding that the chapter was not White’s finest writing, and the unfairness of submitting a chapter out of narrative sequence, the hoax prompted a minor crisis in Australian literature: if the industry couldn’t recognize the greatness of our sole Nobel winner, how unenlightened must the country’s publishing industry be now? Shortly thereafter, the ABC launched an online portal called Why Bother With Patrick White? The portal always struck me as sad. What other major writer would need a website dedicated to convincing his countrymen to give him another go? The link to the website is dead now. It would seem, in the end, that nobody could be bothered with Patrick White.
    ellauri097.html on line 302: In some respects this reflects a national pathology. Unlike an American or British child, an Australian student can go through thirteen years of education without reading much of their country’s literature at all (of the more than twenty writers I studied in high school, only two were Australian). This is symptomatic of the country’s famed “cultural cringe,” a term first coined in the 1940s by the critic A.A. Phillips to describe the ways that Australians tend to be prejudiced against home-grown art and ideas in favor of those imported from the UK and America. Australia’s attitude to the arts has, for much of the last two centuries, been moral. “What these idiots didn’t realize about White was that he was the most powerful spruiker for morality that anybody was going to read in an Australian work,” argued David Marr, White’s biographer, during a talk at the Wheeler Centre in 2013. “And here were these petty little would-be moral tyrants whinging about this man whose greatest message about this country in the end was that we are an unprincipled people.”
    ellauri097.html on line 313: Ulrichs war überzeugt, dass die Urninge und die Dioninge von verschiedener Natur seien und daher der Ausdruck „widernatürliche Unzucht“ auf Liebe zwischen Urningen nicht anwendbar war. Die Liebe zwischen zwei Urningen war nach Meinung Ulrichs’ in höchstem Maße ethisch, weil sie die beiden Individuen ihrer Natur gemäß entwickeln lässt. In seinen Schriften erörterte Ulrichs auch die Frage einer Ehe zwischen einem Urning und einem Dioning und inwieweit diese ethisch vertretbar sei.
    ellauri097.html on line 329:
    UrningMiehen fysiikka, naisen sielu, viehättynyt pääasiasssa miehistä.E.M. Forster, Julien Green, Arabian Lawrence, Oscar Wilde, Marcel Proust, Wilt Whatman
    ellauri097.html on line 336: MannlingHyvin maskuliininen mies joka pitää naismaisista miehistä ("butch gay")Patrick White
    ellauri097.html on line 340: ConjunctivMies joka pitää miehistä ja bylsiskin niitä
    ellauri097.html on line 414: Frederick Dolan, Professor, UC Berkeley, updated Nov 25 his answer in Quora why Nietzsche said Immanuel Cunt was a theologian in tights. (It actually is enough to look at his picture.)
    ellauri097.html on line 418: Kant wanted to prove, in a way that would dumbfound the common man, that the common man was right: that was the secret of this soul. He wrote against the scholars in support of popular prejudice, but for the scholars and not for the people. [§193.]
    ellauri097.html on line 428: A virtue must be our own invention. The fundamental laws of self-preservation and growth demandthat everyone invent his own virtue, his own categorical imperative. How could one fail to feel how Kant’s categorical imperative endangered life itself! The theologians’ instinct alone protected it! [§11.]
    ellauri097.html on line 430: There’s a sense in which all philosophers except Nietzsche have been theologians in disguise, in that they all claimed to be selfless, altruistic seekers of truth and goodness. Socrates, Nietzsche thought, was really doing what was good for him when he claimed that it would be good for everyone to examine their lives. It’s only with Nietzsche – in Nietzsche’s view, that is – that the philosopher removes his mask and publicly proclaims that his philosophical activity is in the service of his will to power. Nietzsche with his drooping mustache was actually less gay than Immanuel Kant.
    ellauri097.html on line 438: If you are interested in a unique David Hume Turban for yourself, you can email the Edinburgh University Philosophy Society, who are offering a special promotion of £120 per hat (excl. Shipping&Handling). This offer will be open until August 1st.
    ellauri097.html on line 449: Recently a caller to the radio told me about a conversation he’d had about homosexuality. The caller made the teleological argument, that looking at what the natural functions of the male and female reproductive organs are for, we can draw certain conclusions about how they should properly be used. The person he was talking with challenged his argument that you can’t get an “ought” from an “is”. The challenger seemed to be saying that just because it is that way in nature doesn’t mean that we can derive a moral rule from it. The caller asked if the challenge was incorrect and how to respond to it.
    ellauri097.html on line 453: The is-ought fallacy, first articulated, by David Hume is put simply as you can’t get an ‘ought’ from an ‘is.’ The more precise way of characterizing it is this; You cannot have a syllogism that has a moral term in the conclusion if there is no moral term in the premises. To be a valid argument, the conclusion has to follow from the premises. You can’t have anything in the conclusion that isn’t already set up in the premises. Hume identified this particular fallacy in arguments that were based on mere descriptive elements but had a conclusion with moral terms in it. That is the is-ought fallacy.
    ellauri097.html on line 458: It seems like they’re just simply making a description: This is the way it is; therefore it is okay, in the moral sense of the word. They are presuming some moral state of affairs based on a mere description, and that’s an example of the is-ought fallacy.
    ellauri097.html on line 459: If they want to work on repairing the flaw in their argument, they’re welcome to try that. It would involve introducing a moral term that can be substantiated into the premise to arrive at a conclusion with a moral term. They might say, “If a thing is natural, then it’s moral. This is natural for me, therefore it’s moral.” Now, there’s a valid argument. I don’t think it’s sound, but at least it doesn’t commit the is-ought fallacy.
    ellauri097.html on line 461: Let’s look at the teleological argument based on function. The teleological argument isn’t about just the way a thing works, but the way a thing is intended to work – purpose. My pen functions a certain way. It doesn’t just function that way by accident. It was intended by someone to function with a purpose. For those who are not familiar with this, teleology means ‘end.’ A telos is ‘end’ as in ‘goal.’ Something is intended for a purpose and it’s used for that purpose.
    ellauri097.html on line 464: I’m not actually using a moral ‘wrong’ in this particular illustration, but notice how you can understand right or wrong in terms of teleology, depending on what the goal is. If I have a loose screw on the refrigerator and I choose a butter knife to tighten the screw, I’m going to ruin the butter knife because I’m not using it for its intended purpose. It’s not made to function as a screwdriver, even if it can be used that way in a pinch. It will get bent or can slip out and scratch the refrigerator. It wasn’t fulfilling its telos, its purpose, or its function, and therefore it was being used wrongly.
    ellauri097.html on line 467: One way of arguing against homosexuality is to say that males were not intended to have sex with other males, and we can tell that by the way sexual organs appear to be intended to function. Because men were not intended to have sex with other males, and they do so, then they are violating their natural teleology, their natural function. But notice that in the nature of the argument we are making a moral claim implicitly up front. We’re saying, We ought to use things the way they were intended by their Maker to be used, consistent with their teleology. This isn’t that way, therefore it’s wrong. It’s not arguing merely on how bodies are naturally, but how they are intended to function naturally. The teleology is the moral term in the premises.
    ellauri097.html on line 469: Incidentally, this is the very argument that is being used in the Bible in both the Old Testament and the New Testament regarding homosexuality. In the book of Leviticus, it talks about homosexuality being a capital crime, and an abomination. Leviticus 18:22, “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.” The purpose of sex is for a man and woman, so it’s abomination when that intended function is violated by homosexual sex.
    ellauri097.html on line 471: In Romans 1:26, the New Testament says, “For this reason, God gave them over to degrading passions, for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural,” that is, different than what God intended. “And in the same way, also, men abandoned the natural function of the woman, and burned in their desire towards one another.” The translation used here is the New American Standard Bible because I think the NIV is woefully inadequate in the way it translates this passage from the Greek.
    ellauri097.html on line 473: Paul is saying that when it comes to sexual desire, women were made for men, and men for women, and that’s the functional relationship that God designed them for. They are violating this functional relationship by instead sexually desiring one that was not intended. And, in fact, the wording about male homosexuality is, “They abandoned the natural function of the woman.” So the woman that God provided for them, they are abandoning that for something that, in God’s teleology, is unnatural. So that’s the way our natural law argument works in these two passages.
    ellauri097.html on line 475: Of course, this trades on the notion that human beings, in this case, were made for certain ends. And if a person wants to deny God, then we weren’t made for certain ends, and that’s a way to get out of this argument. So does this argument work for people who are not theists?
    ellauri097.html on line 503: Gilgamesh, toi muinainen soturikuningas, oli samannimisen eepoxen (Gilgamesh-eepos siis) sankari. Se oli luultavasti historiallisesta Urukin 5. kuninkaasta tehty sarja.
    ellauri097.html on line 511: John Boswell was a Roman Catholic, having converted from the Episcopal Church of his upbringing at the age of 15. He remained a daily-mass Catholic until his death, despite differences with the church over sexual issues. Although he was orthodox in most of his beliefs, he strongly disagreed with his church's stated opposition to homosexual behavior and relationships. He was partnered with Jerone Hart for some twenty years until his death. Hart and Boswell are buried together at Grove Street Cemetery, New Haven, Connecticut.
    ellauri097.html on line 603: Kirjan loputtomuuden illuusio on historiallisesti saatu aikaan niin, että painoksen loppuessa mutta kysynnän jatkuessa painetaan lisää.
    ellauri097.html on line 697: “A Tuft of Flowers” is written in heroic couplets, with some variation from a strict iambic foot. All rhymes are masculine; the majority of lines are end-stopped. This, in part, gives the poem its marching, old-fashioned sound.
    ellauri097.html on line 714: The dew was gone that made his blade so keen Kaste oli kuivunut joka terotti sen terää
    ellauri097.html on line 718: I listened for his whetstone on the breeze. Kuulostelin sen hiomakiven ääntä tuulessa.
    ellauri097.html on line 720: But he had gone his way, the grass all mown, Muze oli mennyt tiehensä, homma oli hoidossa,
    ellauri097.html on line 732: And once I marked his flight go round and round, Ja huomasin sen kerran pyörivän paikallansa lennossa
    ellauri097.html on line 760: And hear his long scythe whispering to the ground, ja olin kuulevinani sen pitkän viikatteen suihkinan,
    ellauri097.html on line 765: But glad with him, I worked as with his aid, Vaan iloisena puuhasin sen perässä, sen ohjauxella,
    ellauri097.html on line 794: I shall be telling this with a sigh Kerron tästä varmaan joskus huokaisten
    ellauri097.html on line 802: Robert Frost, often regarded as a folksy farmer-poet, was also a more profound, even terrifying, creator. His poem "The Road Not Taken" reveals his delight in multiple meanings, his ambivalence, and his penchant for misleading his readers. He denied that the poem proclaimed his striving for the unconventional and asserted that it was meant to tease his friend Edward Thomas for his compulsive indecisiveness. This essay also notes the unconscious meanings of the poem, including Frost's reactions to losing his close friend, his own indecisiveness, his conflict between heterosexual and homosexual object choices, his need for a "secret sharer," and his attachments. J Glenn. Psychoanal Study Child. 2001.
    ellauri097.html on line 816: Robert Frost's personal life was plagued by grief and loss. In 1885 when he was 11, his father died of tuberculosis, leaving the family with just eight dollars. Frost's mother died of cancer in 1900. In 1920, he had to commit his younger sister Jeanie to a mental hospital, where she died nine years later. Mental illness apparently ran in Frost's family, as both he and his mother suffered from depression, and his daughter Irma was committed to a mental hospital in 1947. Frost's wife, Elinor, also experienced bouts of depression.
    ellauri098.html on line 36: 135 homoj like this
    ellauri098.html on line 56: The greatest challenges a detective faces aren't always a devious criminal or a really tough case — all those are a cakewalk compared to managing their personal life. The genius ones are nerds with trouble getting along with people or worse, have social or personality disorders. The hard-working ones are workaholics who let their family relationships slide because they're never home. The overworked and nervous ones dabble in drugs and court substance addictions (or blood). The Film Noir detective and his descendants have terrible luck with women, who either end up dead, broken or distant; if he has a wife he may be cheating on her. And gods help him and his friends if some of the bad guys or associates that they helped put in the clink come back to haunt him. And his personal finances are probably gone thanks to being The Gambling Addict. In short, it's rare to have a detective as a main character in a dramatic story and have them not have at least one serious character flaw that's tangential to them actually working cases.
    ellauri098.html on line 58: What's your malfunction? A flawed character is more interesting than a flawless character. Ergo, a cast of characters with flaws is more interesting exponentially. An easy way to crank up drama is to supply everyone with a tragic past, a messed up family history, other significant issues (physical, psychological, etc.) or some combination of the three. When Dysfunction Junction comes into play, good parents can be as common as penguins in the Sahara, instead turning out to be neglectful, smothering/overprotective, unfeeling, abusive, misguided, or dead. And let's not even get into the rest of the family.
    ellauri098.html on line 60: The resulting prevalence of personal trauma often stretches suspension of disbelief and is a leading cause of Cerebus Syndrome. If done poorly, this is a one-way ticket to Wangst territory, and as so many attempt to smother the series with dysfunction, Too Bleak, Stopped Caring is a frequent result. If done well, you get a large number of interesting, sympathetic, flawed characters, and their interactions with each other gradually reveal the multiple sides to each of them. More realistic (i.e. not Flanderized) portrayals of this trope can even help the audience understand and cope with their own dysfunctional lives, especially with regards to issues that are typically glossed over in mainstream society.
    ellauri098.html on line 62: This trope often goes hand in hand with There Are No Therapists, Trauma Conga Line and dramatic Crapsack Worlds. Big, Screwed-Up Family can be a justification for this trope. When all or nearly all involved parties are insane, you have a Cast Full of Crazy. Royal families are particularly prone to this, as are cops and detectives. The Dysfunction Junction is the natural habitat of the Jerkass Woobie.
    ellauri098.html on line 175: According to Propp, based on his analysis of 100 folktales from the corpus of Alexander Fyodorovich Afanasyev, there were 31 basic structural elements (or 'functions') that typically occurred within Russian fairy tales. He identified these 31 functions as typical of all fairy tales, or wonder tales [skazka] in Russian folklore. These functions occurred in a specific, ascending order (1-31, although not inclusive of all functions within any tale) within each story. This type of structural analysis of folklore is referred to as "syntagmatic". This focus on the events of a story and the order in which they occur is in contrast to another form of analysis, the "paradigmatic" which is more typical of Lévi-Strauss's structuralist theory of mythology. Lévi-Strauss sought to uncover a narrative's underlying pattern, regardless of the linear, superficial syntagm, and his structure is usually rendered as a binary oppositional structure. For paradigmatic analysis, the syntagm, or the linear structural arrangement of narratives is irrelevant to their underlying meaning.
    ellauri098.html on line 177: TV Tropes is a wiki that collects and documents descriptions and examples of plot conventions and devices, more commonly known as tropes, within many creative works. Since its establishment in 2004, the site has shifted focus from covering only television and film tropes to those in other types of media such as literature, comics, anime, manga, video games, music, advertisements, and toys, and their associated fandoms, as well as some non-media subjects such as history, geography, and politics.
    ellauri098.html on line 193: 4.KYBERVAKOILU. Pahis lypsää tiimin jäsenistä tietoa. Käärme menee kiemurtamaan vetävästi Eevan edessä.
    ellauri098.html on line 195: 5. ETUMATKA: Pahis saa haluamaansa tietoa, esim hilloviivan koordinaatteja tai kuvan etuveitikasta.
    ellauri098.html on line 197: 6. PETKUTUS: Pahis koittaa petkuttaa uhrilta tai vaihtaa herolta jotain arvokasta. Käärme koittaa päästä Eevan viivalle ja kiusaaja tinkaa jeesuxelta taivaan pääsylippua.
    ellauri098.html on line 199: 7. KETKUILU: Uhri auttaa auttamatta pahista, joka pääsee jonnekin kaikkein pyhimpään. Esim Eeva antaa epähuomiossa käärmeelle, ennenkuin antaa omenan Aatamille.
    ellauri098.html on line 202: b) ja/tai PUUTE: Samaan aikaan tai vaihtoehtoisesti, joku tiimin jäsen kaipaa jotain jota puuttuu kotoa (juotavaa, nettikauppatuotteita, tms.). Pahis voi epäsuorasti huijata perheenjäsentä luulemaan eze tarttee niitä. Esim Eevan tekee mieli omenaa. Ei sitä kyllä tarvinnut naida väkisin.
    ellauri098.html on line 204: 9. TWIITTI: Hero kuulee edellä mainituista pahixen puuhista. Jahven riistakamerasta näkyy, että Aatami ja Eeva tekee toisillensa vihtahousuja.
    ellauri098.html on line 212: SPOILERI: Nun /ˈnʊn/, in the Hebrew Bible, was a man from the Tribe of Ephraim, grandson of Ammihud, son of Elishama, and father of Joshua (1 Chronicles 7:26–27). Nun grew up in and may have lived his entire life in the Israelites´ Egyptian captivity, where the Egyptians "made life bitter for them with harsh labor at mortar and bricks and with all sorts of tasks in the field" (Exodus 1:14). In Aramaic, "nun" means "fish". Thus the Midrash tells: "[T]he son of him whose name was as the name of a fish would lead them [the Israelites] into the land" (Genesis Rabba 97:3).
    ellauri098.html on line 222: 16. KAMPPAILU: Hero and pahis tapaavat ja ottaa erää suoraan, joko flaidaavat tai muuten kisailevat. Voisko tää olla niinko Jaakob joka paini pystypainia herra isoherran kanssa ja satutti sitä "joteskin" nivusiin?
    ellauri098.html on line 226: 18. VOITTO: Pahis ottaa lukua, hero tuulettaa - häviää tappelun, jää kakkosexi, saa herolta selkäänpuukotuxen, karkoitetaan taas, tms. No tää on selkeesti se Jeesuxen ja paholaisen kakkoserä, joka aiheutti Jerusalemissa odottamattoman auringonpimennyxen ja vulkaanista toimintaa. Ristikakkosen voitto padasta, hertasta ja ruudusta.
    ellauri098.html on line 238: 24. PERUSTEETON VAADE: Väärä hero esittää vaateita ilman kuittia. Tää voi olla pahis, tai joku sen rääppä, tai joku ihan muu. Jopa joku myöhempien seikkailujen luovuttaja.
    ellauri098.html on line 250: 30. RANGAISTUS: Pahis kokee pahojen tekojensa seurauxet, ehkä heron toimesta, tai uhrin kostona, tai oman mokan takia. Näitä löytyy joka sarjasta. Psalmeissa on sellaisesta myös monia värikkäitä skenejä. Pienocaisten calloja paiscotaan ciwiin oikein apinan raivolla.
    ellauri098.html on line 275: Nää roolit jaetaan joskus useampiin henkilöihin, esim lohikäärme ja sen sukulaiset, nilkki ja sen rääpät. Kääntäen hahmoja voi myös yhdistellä, esim. prinssin isä voi olla sekä lähettäjä että jonkun miekan luovuttaja. Pahis ja hero yhdistyvät harvemmin, paizi postnmodernistisissa saduissa. Prinsessa ja hero voi olla samixet nykyaikana. Silloin prinssinnakkia ei ehkä tarvita, kuten esim. Frozenissa tai uudessa Mulanissa.
    ellauri098.html on line 285: Kaikki narratologiset trooppi- ja hahmolistauxet on liian pikkutarkkoja. Niissä on EFK mielessä mukana turhaa kontextia. Proppinkin 7 hahmoa ja 31 episodia on aivan liikaa. Siinä on implisiittisesti kaikenlaista kertolaskua. Sen henkilöt pitää jakaa piirteisiin. Vaikkapa Hyvis/pahis/dumari * seniori/juniori * peto/saalis.
    ellauri098.html on line 290: seniori pahis = konna
    ellauri098.html on line 291: juniori pahis = väärä hero
    ellauri098.html on line 306: In a separate incident in 2012, in response to other complaints by Google, TV Tropes changed its guidelines to restrict coverage of sexist tropes and rape tropes. Feminist blog The Mary Sue criticized this decision, as it censored documentation of sexist tropes in video games and young adult fiction. ThinkProgress additionally condemned Google AdSense itself for "providing a financial disincentive to discuss" such topics. Vittu Google pitäis vetää alas vessanpöntöstä.
    ellauri098.html on line 349: Universaaleja trooppeja olisivat seuraavat 106: Se olen minä, Olkoon menneexi, Tavis siis pahis, Moukan tuuri, Fanit muistaa tissit, Valkotaulu, Hobonyytti, Isompi parempi, Nuija ja tosinuija, Bonusmazku, Vanhassa vara parempi, Flashback, Tshehovin pyssy, Herot jumissa, Peitto paremmin, Doppelgänger jää kiinni, Hullu idea toimii, Lokalisoimaton vinkkaus, Hidastettu räjähdys, Lähettämätön kirje, Voitto diskauxella, Joku muu saa kiitoxet, Keijut vastaan knääpiöt, Tunteet pintaan, Hyvää pahixessa, Aikuisviihde, Kissa kadoxissa, Tiimin puhetorvi, Pää kädessä, Fiktiivinen vastine, Käsi kamerassa, Akun omatunto, Genrensynnyttäjä, Epäuskottava skene, Genresekoitus, Genrentappaja, Julkkis Japanissa, Elämän päämäärä, Trendikuvaaja, Tiimihali, Rahapuu, Vaarallinen koskea, Oza pöytään, Hero, Eka erä konnalle, Yxi kylä vastustaa, Toivo elää, Ilmainen lounas herolle, Okei olen tekopyhä, Tekopyhä, Lukukelvoton texti, Improvisoitu astalo, Huppupää, Kakun sisästä, Oikeesti kiinnostaa vaan Godzilla, Kuzupilli, Tiiminvetäjä, Diagnoosi pahentaa tautia, Valheenpaljastin, Porsaanreikä, Pitkä tukka on tyttöjen, Emokarhu, Missio venyy, Salaperäinen viesti, Profeetta omalla maalla, Koskaan ei käydä paskalla, Ei suuntavaistoa, Ulos kuvaajasta, Ainoa Toivo, Julle Ankanpää, Sepe Susi, Läpeensä terve, Tinapaperijuoni, Ystävät voimaannuttavat, Epifania, Koirantaputtaja voittaa, Tomppelisyötti, Salainen moraalitesti, Potti nokkiin, Sairasta ja väärin, Narunpätkästä voi olla hyötyä, Keihäänkantaja, Alan uuden elämän, Skene välähdyxinä, Horror silminnäkijän silmistä, Mehukas särkymisen ääni, Oma koti kullan kallis, Saalissäkki, Aika aikaa kutakin, Ariadnen lanka, Suunsoitto ennen mazia, Trilogia, Trooppivihje, Kotonakin on konnia, Puhelinetiketti teeveessä, Yhteensopivat keskustelunkatkelmat, Pidetty konna, Epäluotettava lähde, Epäluotettava kertoja, Nupit yhteentoista, Esitrooppi, Triste post coitum, Sää ei sovi tarkoituxeen, Pyrrhoxen voitto, Sik kun piti olla sak, Kotiinpääsy on estynyt.
    ellauri098.html on line 380: Ei tää riitä oikein mihinkään, tarvitaan vielä lisää muuttujia, esim hyvis/pahis tai peto/saalis, ja viisas/tyhmäkin erixeen, koska viisaita on sekä ovelia että harkizevia, edelliset on kuumia ja toiset kylmiä. Joo nää Hippokrateen tyypit riittää kuvaamaan vaan tunne-elämää. Eli tarvitaan vähintään jotain jungilaista kamaa lisäxi. Mitäs sillä oli: intro/extro, joka jakautui vielä intuitio/sensaatio, tieto/tunne, ja tuomio/havainto axeleille. Ei hemmetti ei tääkään riitä, tässä tulee enintään mukaan fixu/tyhmä, eli intro typet on nörttejä ja extro typet on action figuureja. Vielä puuttuu kiltti/ilkeä eli hyvis/pahis. Mites sitten alkais elukoita kuvata?
    ellauri098.html on line 382: No eläinsadun karhu, susi ja kettu on selviä. Karhu on iso vahva hidasjärkinen, flegmaattinen, intro enemmän kuin extro. (Paizi kamalien eläinten karhu, joka on psykopaatti narsisti. Nalle Puh on selvä masis.) Se ei ole selkeästi hyvis eikä pahis, lähinnä dumari. Susi on koleerinen, agressiivinen mutta tyhmänoloinen, enempi extro, ja selvä pahis. Kettu on extro, ovela, kiero, tollanen junioripahis. Sangviinikko selvästi. Kukas olis sitten melankoolinen? Ihaa on melankolinen, mutta aasia ei voi sijoittaa, Shrekin aasi on selkeesti sangviininen, tollanen tyypillinen sivuvaunuhahmo, comic relief. Hullua että koomisella hahmollakin on kevennys. Mut ehkä Shrek onkin melankoolikko. On sekin koomista. Piisamirotta on pessimisti, muttei melankoolinen, sehän on selvä epikuurolainen. Kameli on pahansisuinen ja salavihainen. Se olis koleernen mutta introvertti sellainen.
    ellauri098.html on line 405: In Carlyle’s book On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in Society (Carlyle, 1840), somebody (most likely the author) dove into the lives of several men he deemed “heroes,” like Muhammed, Richard Wagner, Shakespeare, Martin Luther, and Napoleon. He believed that history “turned” on the decisions of these men, and encouraged others to study these heroes as a way of discovering one’s own true nature.
    ellauri098.html on line 434: Ja selvästi näkee että jenkkimaailmankuvan tykkäyxet ja tykkäämättä jättämiset näkyy siinä ketkä missäkin lokerossa mainitaan. On selkeesti hyvislokeroita ja pahislokeroita, sanoopa lokeron päälle sokeroitu texti mitä tahansa. Jill Pylkkänen osais sanoa suoralta kädeltä mitkä on hyvislokeroita. Valitettavasti sen omat kiltit lapset ei pääse niihin, vaan putoaa auttamatta väpelöiden vilttiketjuihin. Hyvä Matin lapset! Right on!
    ellauri098.html on line 457: Röyhkeitä poliitikkoja, rähiseviä julkkixia ja maineikkaita fasistikihoja

    ellauri098.html on line 463: INTJs are the “Mastermind” personality: intellectual, logical, driven, and confident in their own abilities, but also sometimes cold and unsympathetic, with a tendency to prefer theory over reality. This can cause others to perceive them as arrogant, especially since INTJs frequently lack the patience and communications skills to explain themselves.
    ellauri098.html on line 499: Because of this, INFJs have a tendency to take on the world single-handed, and can become crushed and disillusioned in the face of massive challenges. But many of the great changes in our society have been driven by determined INFJs.

    ellauri098.html on line 526: ESFJs are traditionalists and believe in the authority of groups. They love stability and dislike conflict, so they can sometimes end up dismissing minority opinions in the name of achieving consensus. This can lead them to be controlling and intolerant. Some ESFJs also focus too much on making everyone happy at their own expense. But most ESFJs bring harmony to everyone around them.

    ellauri098.html on line 564: ISFPs are creative and imaginative, with well-developed aesthetic senses. They are naturally suited for work in music, art, design, or other areas where an eye for beauty is important. They love to explore ideas and experiment with different styles, and constantly seek out new experiences, making them spontaneous and unpredictable. This, however, can lead to a lack of focus. ISFPs also tend to have fragile egos and react badly to criticism — however well-intentioned, it is difficult for them to not take it personally. Like all introverted types, they need time on their own to think and recharge, but they still love to share their latest innovations with others.
    ellauri098.html on line 737: The Manual has lots of very useful material, but it costs close to $100 (gasp!). Here are the latest figures based on a random sample using the Form M. 16,000 people were contacted. The forms of 3,009 people u with "best fit" as determined by the client, the results of this survey were not shown to the individuals to see if they indeed did fit. Nevertheless, the survey does give us a good cross section of results to work from. The sample is corrected for the demographics of the USA. (Did some Es not hand in their form because they were talking too much. Did some of the Is get so caught up in their inner world? Did the Ss get so obsessed with details they didn´t hand it in? Did the Ns get so caught up in the big picture? Did the Ts figure it was too airy-fairy people stuff? Did the Fs focus so much on how they felt that they didn't get theirs off? Maybe the Js didn't like the way it was organized? The Ps just may not have found the right moment to get down to doing the inventory.)
    ellauri099.html on line 46: The Picture of Dorian Gray is a Gothic and philosophical novel by Oscar Wilde, first published complete in the July 1890 issue of Lippincott's Monthly Magazine. Fearing the story was indecent, prior to publication the magazine's editor deleted roughly five hundred words without Wilde's knowledge. Despite that censorship, The Picture of Dorian Gray offended the moral sensibilities of British book reviewers, some of whom said that Oscar Wilde merited prosecution for violating the laws guarding public morality. In response, Wilde aggressively defended his novel and art in correspondence with the British press, although he personally made excisions of some of the most controversial material when revising and lengthening the story for book publication the following year.
    ellauri099.html on line 48: The longer and revised version of The Picture of Dorian Gray published in book form in 1891 featured an aphoristic preface—a defence of the artist's rights and of art for art's sake—based in part on his press defences of the novel the previous year. The content, style, and presentation of the preface made it famous in its own right, as a literary and artistic manifesto. In April 1891, the publishing firm of Ward, Lock and Company, who had distributed the shorter, more inflammatory, magazine version in England the previous year, published the revised version of The Picture of Dorian Gray.
    ellauri099.html on line 55: Dorian Gray is the subject of a full-length portrait in oil by Basil Hallward, an artist impressed and infatuated by Dorian's beauty; he believes that Dorian's beauty is responsible for the new mood in his art as a painter. Through Basil, Dorian meets Lord Henry Wotton, and he soon is enthralled by the aristocrat's hedonistic world view: that beauty and sensual fulfilment are the only things worth pursuing in life.
    ellauri099.html on line 57: Newly understanding that his beauty will fade, Dorian expresses the desire to sell his soul, to ensure that the picture, rather than he, will age and fade. The wish is granted, and Dorian pursues a libertine life of varied amoral experiences while staying young and beautiful; all the while, his portrait ages and records every sin.
    ellauri099.html on line 59: Deciding that only full confession will absolve him of wrongdoing, Dorian decides to destroy the last vestige of his conscience and the only piece of evidence remaining of his crimes; the picture. In a rage, he takes the knife with which he murdered Basil Hallward and stabs the picture. The servants of the house awaken on hearing a cry from the locked room; on the street, a passerby who also heard the cry calls the police. On entering the locked room, the servants find an unknown old man stabbed in the heart, his figure withered and decrepit. The servants identify the disfigured corpse by the rings on its fingers, which belonged to Dorian Gray. Beside him, the portrait is now restored to its former appearance of beauty.
    ellauri099.html on line 61: Here is an example of what you will now see in the uncensored version, where Hallward professes his love for Dorian:
    ellauri099.html on line 71: Dulness and dirt are the chief features of Lippincott’s this month: The element that is unclean, though undeniably amusing, is furnished by Mr. Oscar Wilde’s story of The Picture of Dorian Gray. It is a tale spawned from the leprous literature of the French decadents—a poisonous book, the atmosphere of which is heavy with the mephitic odours of moral and spiritual putrefaction—a gloating study of the mental and physical corruption of a fresh, fair and golden youth, which might be fascinating but for its effeminate frivolity, its studied insincerity, its theatrical cynicism, its tawdry mysticism, its flippant philosophizings. . . . Mr. Wilde says the book has “a moral.” The “moral,” so far as we can collect it, is that man’s chief end is to develop his nature to the fullest by “always searching for new sensations,” that when the soul gets sick the way to cure it is to deny the senses nothing.
    ellauri099.html on line 86: How to Get Rid of Barn Swallows? Hire an Exterminator. For as beautiful as their song is, barn swallows also bring a lot of less attractive features when they move into your property. The early-morning noise and piles of droppings and feathers they create are reason enough to want these birds gone. As an Amazon Associate, this site earns from qualifying purchases.
    ellauri099.html on line 114: AugustinushippopernaAthletikerhis.jpg/1200px-Hippo_memphis.jpg" height="100px" />
    ellauri099.html on line 148: KafkapikkulepakkopernaDysplastikerINTP – Arkkitehti/INFP - Parantainenhis-hair-picture-id52375026?s=2048x2048" height="100px" />
    ellauri099.html on line 164: In 314/3, Xenocrates died from hitting his head, after tripping over a bronze pot in his house. Which just goes to show.
    ellauri099.html on line 170: Although the splendidly unreliable Diogenes Laertius says that Plato possessed no property other than what is mentioned in his will, he received a large sum of money from Dionysius I. Plato had a significant fund of money at his disposal (the exorbitant figure of 80 talents is mentioned). Indeed, Plato is also said to have had a banker called Andromedes. In other words, Plato was rich and had wealthy patrons and very probably wealthy students.
    ellauri099.html on line 172: We are less attracted to the idea of the wealthy aristocratic philosopher sequestered in his research facility and making occasional overseas trips to visit foreign tyrants than the image of the poor, shoeless Socrates causing trouble in the marketplace, refusing to be paid and getting killed by the city for his trouble. But our captivation with this image, once again, is overwhelmingly fatass Plato’s clever branding.
    ellauri099.html on line 174: And behind his extraordinary inventiveness, Plato performs a characteristic disappearing trick. Truth to tell, we know very little about Plato. According to Plutarch, he was a lover of figs. Big deal! Plato is mentioned only a couple of times in the many dialogues that bear his name. He was present at Socrates’ trial but — in a beautifully reflexive moment that he describes in the Phaedo — absent from the moment of Socrates’ death, because he was sick.
    ellauri099.html on line 176: In fact, we don’t even know that he was called Plato, which might have been a nickname. Laertius claims that he was actually called Aristocles, after his grandfather. “Plato” is close to the word “broad” in Greek, like the broad leaves of the platanos or plane tree under which Socrates and Phaedrus sit and talk about eros. Some think that Plato was so called because he was broad-shouldered because of his prowess in wrestling. Or because he got a flat nose, maybe a wrestling memento.
    ellauri099.html on line 178: The Academy complex is approximately 130 feet square. It has the typical dimensions of a palaestra, or wrestling school. In my mind’s eye, I saw an elderly Plato sitting watching his academicians wrestle, occasionally offering coaching advice and encouragement.
    ellauri099.html on line 181: Plato worked at the Academy until his death in 347 B.C.E., interrupted only by two more extended trips to Sicily. The Academy survived for a few more centuries until it was destroyed by the Roman general Sulla in 87 B.C.E. during the sack of Athens. The buildings were probably burned along with many other sanctuaries, and the trees from the grove of academe were felled to provide timber for his siege machines. So it goes, I thought.
    ellauri099.html on line 188: It is said that Aristotle was a difficult character — somewhat arrogant, thinking he was cleverer than everyone else (quite possibly true) and even criticizing his headmaster of many years, Plato. (Who was quite a butthead in comparison.) He was a perhaps a bit of a dyskolos, a grouch, cantankerous, a curmudgeon.
    ellauri099.html on line 190: Aristotle was not much loved by the Athenians. This might have been because he was a tricky customer or because he was an immigrant: a metoikos or metic, resident alien, an ancient green card holder; Greek, but decidedly not an Athenian citizen, something like an American in London. Given his close ties to the Macedonian aristocracy, which was extending and tightening its military and political control across Greece, perhaps the Athenians were right to be suspicious of Aristotle.
    ellauri099.html on line 199: Famously, Aristotle was asked by Philip II of Macedon to be the tutor of his 13-year-old son, Alexander. Aristotle set up school in the Macedonian fortress of Mieza, and the young prince was taught together with his companions, who probably numbered around 30 students. A big class. This was a closed school, a boarding school of sorts. A sense of the seriousness with which Aristotle performed his duties can be gleaned from the fact that he composed two treatises in honor of Alexander, “On Kingship” and "On Colonies" as guidebooks for the prince, as well as editing a copy of Homer’s “Iliad” specifically for Alexander’s use — the so-called “casket copy” (presumably because it was small enough to fit inside his casket).
    ellauri099.html on line 203: Athens didn’t make the same mistake as Thebes and meekly submitted to the Macedonian pike. It is in this context that Aristotle returned to the city at around age 50. And he came back big time. Because of his metic status, Aristotle was not allowed to buy property. So — as one does — he rented. He took over a gymnasium site sacred to Apollo Lyceus (the wolf-god) and transformed it into the most powerful and well-endowed school in the world.
    ellauri099.html on line 207: The reason Aristotle was able to do this was simple: money. If Plato was rich, then Aristotle was wealthier than Croesus, right up there with the Jeff Bezos-es of his day. He received the sum of 800 talents from his presumably grateful former student, Alexander, which was an enormous amount of money. (Consider that the Plato’s Academy cost about 25-30 talents.)
    ellauri099.html on line 209: Expressing ancient money values in modern terms presents a perennial puzzle for historians of economics, so I called on my colleague, the economist Duncan Foley, for help. He very roughly calculated that the annual gross domestic product of classical Athens was about 4,400 talents. If that is right, then 800 talents is a vast figure, 32 times the expenditure on the Academy. Foley is somewhat skeptical of the figure, though. Ancient sources for numerical data (like the size of armies) are notoriously inaccurate, so perhaps a excited copyist simply added a zero.
    ellauri099.html on line 215: The Lyceum was clearly the intellectual projection of Macedonian political and military hegemony. In 323 B.C.E., when news of Alexander the Great’s death in Babylon at the age of 32 reached Athens, simmering anti-Macedonian sentiment spilled over, and the popular Athenian leader Demosthenes was recalled. Aristotle left the city for the last time, in fear of his life, after a little more than a decade in charge of the Lyceum. Seeing himself justly or unjustly in the mirror of Socrates and fearing charges of impiety, Aristotle reportedly said, “I will not allow the Athenians to sin twice against philosophy.” Aristotle withdrew to his late mother’s estate at Chalcis on the island of Euboea and died there shortly after of an unspecified illness, at age 63.
    ellauri099.html on line 219: In the northeast corner of the Lyceum, there was a garden, which possibly led to the peripatos, or shaded walk from which the promenading Peripatetic school derived its name. Indeed, there were gardens in all the earlier philosophical schools, in the schools of Miletus on the present-day Turkish coast, and allegedly in the Pythagorean schools in southern Italy. Plato’s Academy also had a garden. And later, the school of Epicurus was simply called “The Garden.” Theophrastus, a keen botanist like Aristotle who did so much to organize the library and build up its scientific side (with maps, globes, specimens and such like), eventually retired to his garden, which was close by.
    ellauri099.html on line 221: What was the garden for? Was it a space for leisure, strolling and quiet dialectical chitchat? Was it a mini-laboratory for botanical observation and experimentation? Or was it — and I find this the most intriguing possibility — an image of paradise? The ancient Greek word paradeisos appears to be borrowed etymologically from Persian, and it is said that Darius the Great had a "paradise garden," with the kinds of flora and fauna with which we are familiar from the elaborate design of carpets and rugs. A Persian carpet is like a memory theater of paradise. It is possible that Milesian workers and thinkers had significant contact with the Persian courts at Susa and Persepolis. Maybe the whole ancient Greek philosophical fascination with gardens is a Persian borrowing, and an echo of the influence of their expansive empire. But who knows?
    ellauri099.html on line 226: Very low rope barriers separated off areas that visitors were not meant to visit. I looked around for a guard, saw no one, and stepped onto the green moss and made my way quietly to the location of Aristotle’s library. On my hands and knees, I saw the ground was littered with tiny delicate snail shells, no bigger than a fingernails, scattered like empty scholars’ backpacks. My partner gave me one, and I put it in my pocket. I had it on my desk right in front of me as I was writing this. Inadvertently, I crushed it to pieces under the weight of one of Mr. Staikos’s huge tomes on the history of libraries. There’s probably a moral in this, but it escapes me. The moral is this: fucking Americans, keep your fat butts and greedy fingers off European soil!
    ellauri099.html on line 230: We hope you enjoyed this free article. Subscribers make stories like this possible. Thanx to them!
    ellauri100.html on line 38: Vincent van Gogh was not psychotic or bipolar when he cut off his ear, medical experts decide. A conference of 30 international medical experts has announced a more prosaic explanation for the famously tortured artist's behaviour — stress and alcohol.
    ellauri100.html on line 40: Weighing up evidence, including his many letters, they analyzed competing theories that he had suffered from illnesses including epilepsy, cycloid psychosis, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or borderline personality disorder. The panel concluded that the most probable diagnosis was more prosaic.
    ellauri100.html on line 42: The experts divided the artist’s life into two periods – before and after his documented breakdown on December 23 1888 in Arles, southern France, when the artist argued with his friend, Paul Gauguin, and cut off his own ear.
    ellauri100.html on line 44: This was the first of several breakdowns and he was in and out of hospital until he died of a gunshot wound on July 29 1890 in an apparent suicide.
    ellauri100.html on line 45: “This could come from alcohol intoxication, lack of sleep, work stress and troubles with Gauguin, who was going to leave – attachment being one of his problems in life. He has repeated episodes of psychosis but recovered completely in between.”
    ellauri100.html on line 47: Although not proven, the relationship between Van Gogh and Gauguin was definitely different that your average straight male friendship. Scholars from Harvard having analyzed Van Gogh’s life in depth concluded that Van Gogh very well have been bisexual (accounting for his other relationships with women). You can find evidence of a possible love connection between the two in his writings.
    ellauri100.html on line 49: The two lived as roommates for a time in the South of France. An article in Harvard Magazine states that van Gogh's medical biographers agree that his adulthood included periods of hypersexuality, hyposexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality, and that "his stormy homosexual affair with the painter Paul Gauguin included endless, often argumentative discussions."
    ellauri100.html on line 143: Mit seiner Konstitutionstypologie führte Kretschmer 1921 die Unterscheidung zwischen den Typen des Leptosomen, des Pyknikers und des Athletikers ein. Zwischen 1915 und 1921 entwickelte Kretschmer darauf basierend eine Methode zur Differenzialdiagnose von Schizophrenie und Manie. Für das normale Temperament des leptosomen Typs prägte er dabei den Begriff des „Schizothymen“ und eine stärkere Neigung zur Schizophrenie wie geringere Anfälligkeit für manisch-depressive Störungen, umgekehrt für den pyknischen. Der athletische Typ sei eher für Epilepsie anfällig. Wegen Kretschmers Korrelation zwischen Körpergestalt und Anfälligkeit für psychische Störungen wurde er 1929 für den Nobelpreis nominiert.
    ellauri100.html on line 266: Post-retirement: Spent 18 months as the managing editor of an economics journal published by a privately funded, libertarian think-tank in D.C. — more for the meager wage than for the stimulation of working with semi-intelligent, intellectually doubtfully honest contributors and colleagues. Quit when this part-time job became too hot.
    ellauri100.html on line 285: In short, I have walked many streets of life and seen many facets of the human condition. I have been spared much; my personal history excludes the direct effects of war, disaster, and privation. And I have been content to settle for relative obscurity and comfort rather than fame and fortune, even though I might have attained them had I chosen to strive for them. (What a laugh!)
    ellauri100.html on line 293: What is the point of these recollections and glimpses of my character? It is to say that my upbringing, experiences, and personality give me an advantage when it comes to understanding the human condition and prescribing for its ills. This blog — in its very small way — is a place of refuge from uninformed emotion, prolonged adolescent rebellion, guilt, and a refusal (or inability) to change one’s political views for whatever reason — whether it is opportunism, obduracy, willful ignorance, simple stupidity, or an inability to admit error (even to oneself). Naah, why beat about the bush: I like to be visible and froth at the mouth, and with my credentials, this is the best I can do.
    ellauri100.html on line 303: My intelligence was recognized at an early age, but its use was not much stimulated by my parents or the K-12 schools I attended. Only when I went to college was I “stretched”, and then the stretching came mostly at my initiative (unassigned reading and long, solitary sessions working through academic theories). The stretching — which was episodic during my working career — continues to this day, in the form of blogging on subjects that require research, careful analysis, and self-criticism of what I have produced. Self-criticism is central to my personality (see next) and leaves me open to new ideas (see next after that). Like religion. Next I am thinking of becoming a Trotskyist.
    ellauri100.html on line 309: For more revelations about my temperament, see this, this, this, and this.
    ellauri100.html on line 315: The urban riots that followed the murder of Martin Luther King Jr. opened my eyes to the futility of LBJ’s social tinkering. I saw at once that plowing vast sums into a “war” on black poverty would be rewarded with a lack of progress, sullen resentment, and generations of dependency on big brother in Washington. (Regarding the possibility that I am a racial bigot, see the note at the bottom of this page. If you don't care to read that far, yes, I am a racial bigot, and how.)
    ellauri100.html on line 319: However, it was not momentous events but a bit of seemingly irrelevant analysis that administered the coup de grâce to my naïve “liberalism”. It happened in the early 1970s, when my boss asked me to concoct grand measures of effectiveness for the armed forces (i.e., summary measures of antisubmarine warfare capabilities, of tactical strike capabilities, and so on). I struggled with the problem, and made a good-faith effort to provide the measures. But in the end I had to report to my boss that he had given me “mission impossible”. Why? Because, no summary measure could capture the effects of the many factors that would determine the effectiveness of the armed forces: the enemy, the characteristics of his forces, the timing and geographic particulars of any engagement, and so on. (See “Hemibel Thinking” in this post for a précis of my argument.) That was the first time I got sacked. But I returned as soon as my boss got fired.
    ellauri100.html on line 329: …who may be offended by many of the posts at this blog.
    ellauri100.html on line 333: The same goes for jejune libertarians, of all ages, whose narrow rationalism often materializes in rank offensiveness and a tendency toward naive absolutism. (See this and this, for example. And take this, and this!)
    ellauri100.html on line 335: Having said that, I acknowledge that I sometimes adopt a biting or dismissive tone. (See, for example, the fourteen words that follow the em-dash two paragraphs above.) If you will read my blog carefully, however, you will find that my views are grounded in facts and logic. Where you disagree with or question something that I say in a particular post, search this blog and the list of favorite posts for more on the same subject. If you cannot or will not take the time to do that, don’t bother to comment unless you do it politely and give your reasons for disagreeing with me. I will reply politely, factually, and logically.
    ellauri100.html on line 337: If you will bother to read very much of this blog and its predecessor, you will find that I am pro-peace, pro-prosperity, and pro-liberty — positions that leftists and certain libertarians like to claim as theirs, exclusively. Unlike most leftists and more than a few self-styled libertarians, I have seen enough of this world and its ways to know that peace, prosperity, and liberty are achieved when government carries a big stick abroad and treads softly at home (except when it comes to criminals and traitors). Most leftists and many self-styled libertarians, by contrast, engage in “magical thinking,” according to which peace, prosperity, and liberty can be had simply by invoking the words and attaching them to policies that, time and again, have led to war, slow economic growth, and loss of liberty.
    ellauri100.html on line 360: {14:3} He who speaks the truth in his heart, who has not acted deceitfully with his tongue, and has not done evil to his neighbor, and has not taken up a reproach against his neighbors.


    ellauri100.html on line 362: {14:4} In his sight, the malicious one has been reduced to nothing, but he glorifies those who fear the Lord. He who swears to his neighbor and does not deceive.


    ellauri100.html on line 364: {14:5} He who has not given his money in usury, nor accepted bribes against the innocent. He who does these things will be undisturbed for eternity.


    ellauri100.html on line 401: I first took the “Big 5” personality test on 05/28/2009, with this result (details here):
    ellauri100.html on line 405: 1. Openness to experience: High scorers are described as “Open to new experiences. You have broad interests and are very imaginative.” Low scorers are described as “Down-to-earth, practical, traditional, and pretty much set in your ways.” This is the sub-scale that shows the strongest relationship to politics: liberals generally score high on this trait; they like change and variety, sometimes just for the sake of change and variety. Conservatives generally score lower on this trait. (Just think about the kinds of foods likely to be served at very liberal or very conservative social events.)
    ellauri100.html on line 415: A strong sense of security is consistent with this result (from a test taken on 10/02/14):
    ellauri100.html on line 425: This difference seems to explain many of the most contentious issues in the culture war. For example, liberals support legalizing gay marriage (to be fair and compassionate), whereas many conservatives are reluctant to change the nature of marriage and the family, basic building blocks of society. Conservatives are more likely to favor practices that increase order and respect (e.g., spanking, mandatory pledge of allegiance), whereas liberals often oppose these practices as being violent or coercive.
    ellauri100.html on line 433: The idea behind the IAT is that concepts with very closely related (vs. unrelated) mental representations are more easily and quickly responded to as a single unit. For example, if “me” and “sharing” are strongly associated in one’s mind, it should be relatively easy to respond quickly to this pairing by pressing the “E” or “I” key. If “me” and “sharing” are NOT strongly associated, it should be more difficult to respond quickly to this pairing. By comparing reaction times on this test, the IAT gives a relative measure of how strongly associated the two categories (Me, Not Me) are to mental representations of “ethical” and “unethical”. Each participant receives a single score, and your score appears below.
    ellauri100.html on line 441: Your score appears in the graph below in green. The score of the average Liberal visitor to this site is shown in blue and the average Conservative visitor’s score is shown in red.
    ellauri100.html on line 455: The idea behind the scale is that there is very little systematic research on everyday ethical issues in business. This measure has been tested cross-culturally to show relevance for participants from Hong Kong, mainland China and Taiwan. Specifically, a values structure highlighting the importance of self-transcendence values correlates with more ethical behavioral orientations, while a values structure highlighting the importance of the self-enhancement dimension of values correlates with less ethical behavioral orientations. Further, we are interested in what behaviors are seen as unethical as while all individuals espouse ethicality, different types of behavior are often seen as being more or less relevant to ethics, depending on one’s culture. In previous research, women have reported being more ethical than men.
    ellauri100.html on line 457: The graph below shows how often people say that they find various everyday ethical situations to be acceptable in everyday life. This business ethics questionnaire includes 5 categories: Usurpation of company resources, Offering kickbacks, Corporate gamesmanship, Concealment of misconduct, & Cheating Customers. Higher scores indicate greater acceptance of these behaviors.
    ellauri100.html on line 463: The scale you just completed was the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, developed by Douglas Crowne and David Marlowe (1960). This scale measures social desirability concern, which is people’s tendency to portray themselves favorably during social interaction. Each of the 33 true-false items that you just filled out describes a behavior that is either socially acceptable but unlikely, or socially unacceptable but likely. As a result, people who receive high scores on this measure may be more likely to respond to surveys in a self-promoting fashion.
    ellauri100.html on line 465: We are interested in examining how liberals and conservatives score on this scale. Although previous research has investigated how these groups can be biased when evaluating political information, little is known about the relationship between political attitudes and social desirability concern.
    ellauri100.html on line 467: The graph below shows your score on this scale. The scores range from 0% to 100% and represent the proportion of answers that indicated socially desirable responding. Thus, higher scores correspond with higher degrees of socially desirable responding. Your score is shown in green (1st bar). The score of the average liberal respondent is shown in light blue and the score of the average strong liberal is shown in dark blue. The average conservative score is shown in light red and the score of the average strong conservative is shown in dark red.
    ellauri100.html on line 471: Liberals and conservatives seem to disagree in their basic understandings of the causes of human action, particularly of immoral action. Liberals are more likely to believe that social forces, poverty, childhood trauma, or mental illness can serve as valid excuses. Conservatives are more likely to reject such excuses and want to hold people accountable for their actions, including a preference for harsher punishments. At least, that is the way things play out in many disputes in the legal world. We want to see if we can look at this stereotypical difference in more detail. We want to find out WHICH kinds of free will and determinism show a correlation with politics, and with other psychological variables.
    ellauri100.html on line 493: We are interested in measuring happiness on this site because many studies have found that religious people are happier than non-believers, and some have found that politcally conservative people are slightly happier than are political liberals, even after controlling statistically for religiosity. A recent Gallup survey found that religiosity was associated with better mental health for Republicans, but it didn’t make a difference for Democrats. We want to investigate these complex relationships among happiness, morality, religion, and ideology.
    ellauri100.html on line 501: The study you just completed included both a self-report and an implicit measure of well-being. The self-report measure of well-being was the Satisfaction With Life Scale, and the implicit measure was an Implicit Association Test (IAT) that compared the strength of automatic mental associations. In this version of the IAT, we investigated associations between the self-concept and the concepts of happiness and sadness.
    ellauri100.html on line 503: The idea behind the IAT is that concepts with very closely related (vs. unrelated) mental representations are more easily and quickly responded to as a single unit. For example, if “me” and “happy” are strongly associated in one’s mind, it should be relatively easy to respond quickly to this pairing by pressing the “E” or “I” key. If “me” and “happy” are NOT strongly associated, it should be more difficult to respond quickly to this pairing. By comparing reaction times on this test, the IAT gives a relative measure of how strongly associated the two categories (Me, Not Me) are to mental representations of “happy” and “sad”. Each participant receives a single score, and your score appears below.
    ellauri100.html on line 509: Your score appears in the graph below in green. The score of the average Liberal visitor to this site is shown in blue and the average Conservative visitor’s score is shown in red.
    ellauri100.html on line 513: The scale is a measure of your attitudes toward crime and punishment. Some of the items reflected a “progressive” and less punitive attitude toward criminals (for example agreeing with the statement that “punishment should be designed to rehabilitate offenders,” and being opposed to the death penalty). Other items reflected a more “traditional” attitude, including a willingness to use traditional forms of punishment, such as shaming or flogging. We grouped these two kinds of items together to give you a “progressive” and a “traditional” score in the first graph below. We call this the “comprehensive” justice scale because research on justice and punishment has usually taken either a liberal or conservative approach. We are trying to examine the broadest possible range of ideas and intuitions about what you think should happen to the offender, and the victim. Disagreements about crime and punishment have long been at the heart of the “culture war.” By linking your responses here to the information you gave us when you registered, or when you took other surveys, we hope to shed light on what kinds of people (not just liberals and conservatives) endorse what kinds of responses to crime, and why.
    ellauri100.html on line 515: The graph below shows your scores (in green) on the items from the first page, compared to those of the average liberal (in blue) and the average conservative (in red) visitor to this website. The scale runs from 1 (lowest score) to 7 (highest score).
    ellauri100.html on line 517: The second graph shows your results from the items on page 2, where we asked about “alternatives to prison.” This page should produce similar results to what you see from Page 1. We expect liberals to favor the more lenient and rehabilitative alternatives, and conservatives to favor the more punitive options. We are trying out various ways of asking these questions to see which format, or combination of formats, produces the best measurement of people’s attitudes.
    ellauri100.html on line 521: The graph below shows your percentage of intuitive pairings (in green) compared to those of the average liberal (in blue), the average moderate (in purple), the average conservative (in red), and the average libertarian (in gold) visitor to this website.
    ellauri100.html on line 531: The graph below shows your score on the OCT as it compares to others who have taken this survey on our website. Scores range from 0%-100% and higher values correspond to more correct responses to the OCT. Your score is shown in green, scores of the average liberal are in blue, and scores of the average conservative are in red.
    ellauri100.html on line 537: One scale uses questions from the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) 2010 Science and Engineering Indicators, which is an effort to track public knowledge and attitudes toward science and technology trends in the U.S. and other countries. For this survey, the items pertaining to understanding statistics, how to read data charts, and conducting an experiment were used.
    ellauri100.html on line 547: The idea behind this scale is that objective factual knowledge may be an important factor in studies about political issues and reasoning. It may be that people who are more informed about politics (whether they’re liberal or conservative) think and reason differently about moral or political issues than people who are less informed. For instance, are people who are more informed more or less likely to objectively evaluate political arguments? We suspect that, ironically, people with more political knowledge may be less objective when it comes to a number of information processes (see recommended reading below).
    ellauri100.html on line 549: The graphs below show your scores (in green) compared to those of the average liberal (in blue), the average conservative (in red), and the average libertarian (in orange) visitor to this website. The first graph shows your score on the political knowledge scale in comparison to other liberals and conservatives and scores run from 0% (the lowest possible score) to 100% (the highest possible score*).
    ellauri100.html on line 551: The graph below displays results for individuals who took the longer version of the survey before April 19, 2012. Everyone will have a score, but this graph is only valid for those who took the survey before April 19, 2012. Ignore the purple bar since it will incorporate averages from the short and long version of the survey.
    ellauri100.html on line 555: The study you just completed is an Implicit Association Test (IAT) that compares the strength of automatic mental associations. In this version of the IAT, we investigated positive and negative associations with the categories of “African Americans” and “European Americans”.
    ellauri100.html on line 557: The idea behind the IAT is that concepts with very closely related (vs. unrelated) mental representations are more easily and quickly responded to as a single unit. For example, if “European American” and “good” are strongly associated in one’s mind, it should be relatively easy to respond quickly to this pairing by pressing the “E” or “I” key. If “European American” and “good” are NOT strongly associated, it should be more difficult to respond quickly to this pairing. By comparing reaction times on this test, the IAT gives a relative measure of how strongly associated the two categories (European Americans, African Americans) are to mental representations of “good” and “bad”. Each participant receives a single score, and your score appears below.
    ellauri100.html on line 563: Your score appears in the graph below in green. The score of the average Liberal visitor to this site is shown in blue and the average Conservative visitor’s score is shown in red.
    ellauri100.html on line 571: My pen name, Loquitur Veritatem, means truth-teller. My other pen name is Amat Propriam Mentulam. It means loves his own prick.
    ellauri100.html on line 591: Nää menee just oikein. Pykälä 1 koskee kaikkia elukoita, se on se vanha kunnon KILL! FUCK!. Pykälä 2 koskee vaikka paviaaneja tai myyriäisiä, manus manum lavat. Ollaan kateita ja noudatetaan jantelakia. Pykälä 3:ssa tulee mukaan parviäly. Pidetään oman pesän puolia vaikka toiset ei ole sen kummempia. Ollaan sankareita ja annetaan uhreja. Pykälä 4 on nokintajärjestys. Silverbäkit ja alfasudet jyräävät, muut nöyristelevät. Pykälä 5 on pyhistely, eli jotkut eristetään muista virtuaalisixi logoixi. Sisäistetty herruus tulee kehiin. Käsidesiä ja syntiä. Näin siististi näkee asiat harvoin esitettävän. Vasemmistolaiset jäävät moraalin kehityxessä alkumatkalle, loppuun asti pääsevät vaan tosi fasistit.
    ellauri100.html on line 601: Olen asianajaja Ozan Yusuf Esq, menetin asiakkaani ja hänen perheensä auto-onnettomuudessa, hänellä on takavarikoitavaan pankkitilinsä summa (kolmetoista miljoonaa, kahdeksansataa ja kahdeksankymmentä tuhatta dollaria), saan pankin toimeksianto järjestää lähisukulaisensa ennen kuin täällä olevat pankin johtajat takavarikoivat rahaston, syy miksi otin sinuun yhteyttä tässä asiassa johtuu siitä, että sinulla on sama sukunimi edesmenneen kuolleen asiakkaani kanssa, myös hän on kotimaasi kotoisin ja pankkitiliä koskevassa asiakirja-aineistossa ei ole rekisteröityä nimeä perillisenä, ota heti yhteyttä minuun, jotta voin antaa sinulle kaikki tarvittavat tiedot ja lisäselvitykset tästä perintöliikkeestä ymmärryksesi paremmin, jos olet kiinnostunut .
    ellauri100.html on line 641: your allotted time in this vale of sorrow runs out
    ellauri100.html on line 747: And whisper’d like the restless brook:
    ellauri100.html on line 766: One whisk’d a tail,
    ellauri100.html on line 793: One set his basket down,
    ellauri100.html on line 794: One rear’d his plate;
    ellauri100.html on line 803: The whisk-tail’d merchant bade her taste
    ellauri100.html on line 810: One whistled like a bird.
    ellauri100.html on line 856: While to this day no grass will grow
    ellauri100.html on line 900: When the first cock crow’d his warning,
    ellauri100.html on line 939: Racing, whisking, tumbling, hobbling;
    ellauri100.html on line 947: You should not loiter longer at this brook:
    ellauri100.html on line 953: Though this is summer weather,
    ellauri100.html on line 1053: Parrot-voiced and whistler,
    ellauri100.html on line 1113: Barking, mewing, hissing, mocking,
    ellauri100.html on line 1363: Jean-Paul Sartre is sitting at a French cafe, revising his draft of Being and Nothingness. He says to the waitress, “I’d like a cup of coffee, please, with no cream.” The waitress replies, “I’m sorry, Monsieur, but we’re out of cream. How about with no milk?”
    ellauri100.html on line 1375: Barthesin semiotiikassa pintatason merkkien alla piilee myyttien metakieli, esim noi porvarien kusetuxet. Tää oli vähän tollasta marxilaista analyyssia. Merkkimaailman pinnan alla kuhisee valtaapitävien meemejä. Muodista ja muista brändeistä saa samanlaisia äkkäyxiä vaikka kuinka paljon. Naomi Kleinin No Logo on tässä kohden hyvää luettavaa. Kohta kaikki pölkkypäät tuli kysymään Barthesilta neuvoa, ja se kyllästyi herättelemään massoja. Ei ne herää kumminkaan.
    ellauri100.html on line 1388: This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
    ellauri101.html on line 42: Joseph John Campbell (March 26, 1904 – October 30, 1987) was an American professor of literature at Sarah Lawrence College who worked in comparative mythology and comparative religion. His work covers many aspects of the human experience. Campbell's best-known work is his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949), in which he discusses his theory of the journey of the archetypal hero shared by world mythologies, termed the monomyth.
    ellauri101.html on line 44: Since the publication of The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Campbell's theories have been applied by a wide variety of modern writers and artists. His philosophy has been summarized by his own often repeated phrase: "Follow your bliss." He gained recognition in Hollywood when George Lucas credited Campbell's work as influencing his Star Wars saga.
    ellauri101.html on line 46: Joseph Campbell was born in White Plains, New York, on March 26, 1904, the elder son of hosiery importer and wholesaler Charles William Campbell, from Waltham, Massachusetts, and Josephine (née Lynch), from New York. Campbell was raised in an upper-middle-class Irish Catholic family; he related that his paternal grandfather Charles had been "a peasant" who came to Boston from County Mayo in Ireland, and became the gardener and caretaker at the Lyman estate at Waltham, where his son Charles William Campbell grew up and became a successful salesman at a department store prior to establishing his hosiery business. During his childhood, he moved with his family to nearby New Rochelle, New York. In 1919, a fire destroyed the family home in New Rochelle, killing his maternal grandmother and injuring his father, who tried to save her.
    ellauri101.html on line 50: In 1924, Campbell traveled to Europe with his family. On the ship during his return trip he encountered the messiah elect of the Theosophical Society, Jiddu Krishnamurti; they discussed Indian philosophy, sparking in Campbell an interest in Hindu and Indian thought. In 1927, he received a fellowship from Columbia University to study in Europe. Campbell studied Old French, Provençal, and Sanskrit at the University of Paris and the University of Munich. He learned to read and speak French and German.
    ellauri101.html on line 52: On his return to Columbia University in 1929, Campbell expressed a desire to pursue the study of Sanskrit and modern art in addition to medieval literature. Lacking faculty approval, Campbell withdrew from graduate studies. Later in life he jested that it is a sign of incompetence to have a PhD in the liberal arts, the discipline covering his work.
    ellauri101.html on line 56: In February 2020, Brooklyn native Lawrence V. "Larry" Ray, born Lawrence Grecco, who had resided in his daughter's on-campus apartment at Lawrence College in 2010 after his release from prison, was charged by prosecutors in Manhattan with conspiracy, extortion, sex trafficking, forced labor, and other related offenses, following nearly 10 years of alleged transgressions with students and former students. At a bail hearing held March 2, 2020, an Assistant U.S. Attorney disclosed to the Manhattan federal court that Ray had been arrested while in bed with one of his victims. Bail was denied.
    ellauri101.html on line 58: In 1938, he married one of his former students, the dancer-choreographer Jean Erdman. Jean's father Toni wore false teeth and a wig at the wedding. For most of their 49 years of marriage they shared a two-room apartment in Greenwich Village in New York City. In the 1980s they also purchased an apartment in Honolulu and divided their time between the two cities. They did not have any children.
    ellauri101.html on line 61: Campbell died at his home in Honolulu, Hawaii, on October 30, 1987, from complications of esophageal cancer. He is buried in O'ahu Cemetery, Honolulu, among many many more grateful dead.
    ellauri101.html on line 64: Instead of focusing on the many differences between cultural myths and religious stories, however, Campbell looked for the similarities. And his studies resulted in what’s called the monomyth.
    ellauri101.html on line 69: Campbell began identifying the patterns of this monomyth. Over and over again, he was amazed to find this structure in the cultures he studied. He saw the same sequence in many religions including the stories of Gautama Buddha, Moses, and Jesus Christ.
    ellauri101.html on line 70: Campbell outlined the stages of the monomyth in his classic book The Hero with a Thousand Faces (audiobook). Read it later when you got time. Judging by the toc, it is a ripoff from the structuralists.
    ellauri101.html on line 82: Joku John Hollanti jakaa apinat 6 tyyppiin: realistit tutkivat taiteelliset seuralliset yritteliäät sovinnaiset. Nää nimityxet on kyllä aika luppoovan ällöjä. Mut ize testi on typerä ammatinvalintatesti, haluisitko tehdä sitä vaiko tätä duunia. Tää on kyllä erittäinkin tylsä, jopa niin ikävystyttävä ettei se edes ole kaupallinen. The theory was developed by John L. Holland over the course of his career, starting in the 1950s. Tässä mä olin yllätyxettömästi tyyppiä Investigative.
    ellauri101.html on line 149: Carolyn Kalil’s Inner Heroes quiz stems from her books and life’s works. This quiz is a simplified combination of the Myers Briggs & Keirsey II assessments with 36 questions.
    ellauri101.html on line 155: Joseph Campbell, arguably the greatest mythologist of the twentieth century, was certainly one of our greatest storytellers. This masterfully crafted book interweaves conversations between Campbell and some of the people he inspired, including poet Robert Bly, anthropologist Angeles Arrien, filmmaker David Kennard, Doors drummer John Densmore, psychiatric pioneer Stanislov Grof, Nobel laureate Roger Guillemen, and others. Campbell reflects on subjects ranging from the origins and functions of myth, the role of the artist, and the need for ritual to the ordeals of love and romance. With poetry and humor, Campbell recounts his own quest and conveys the excitement of his lifelong exploration of our mythic traditions, what he called “the one great story of mankind.” Hemmetti nää sen sankarit on lähes yhtä tuntemattomia kuin se ize.
    ellauri101.html on line 163: No one wants to upset me! That's a good one! My life was nothing but misery at this place and now people come along ruining my death!
    ellauri101.html on line 233: Huomaa toi oman meemipöntön henk.koht. kuolemattomuuden toiveajatus, jonka varaan kaikki pyhistely perustuu. "Jjarriii!" on tosin kyl tosi autistinen tiimari. Se on yxin oma maailmansa näine toiveunineen.
    ellauri101.html on line 310: Here come bad news, talking this and that (Yeah!)
    ellauri101.html on line 374: Pharrell made the world “Happy” in 2014 with this feel-good anthem. The song soared to #1 in 35 countries—it was the best selling song of 2014.

    ellauri101.html on line 375: Pharrell wrote and produced “Happy” for the soundtrack of Despicable Me 2. It also became the lead single of his second studio album, G I R L.
    ellauri101.html on line 455: Samanlaisia koleerisia kermaperse paskiaisia ja niiden vielä koleerisempia isäpappoja oli Sandhamnin murhissa. Vittu että noi ruozalaiset on sitten "anna mamma ananasta" jengiä.
    ellauri101.html on line 493: Cavan: A dashing, quick witted evil genius. Articulate, devious and charming, this is a guy to watch out for. Cavans are clever and mischievous, and will go to extremes to get their own way. Cavans are very competitive by nature, and do not accept failure. One should never oppose a Cavan in an argument, unless they are prepared for a real battle.
    ellauri101.html on line 494: "He was a real Cavan in the courtroom- jurors and judges alike were unable to withstand his powers of argument and persuasion."
    ellauri101.html on line 509: Op:Overpowered "Demons are OP in this game, nerf them please! "
    ellauri101.html on line 552: Generation is also often used synonymously with cohort in social science; under this formulation it means "people within a delineated population who experience the same significant events within a given period of time". The impressionable years hypothesis is a theory of political psychology that posits that individuals form durable political attitudes and party affiliations during late adolescence and early adulthood. Sukupolvet on olleet globaalisia vasta sitten kun sodatkin.
    ellauri101.html on line 556: The Lost Generation was the social generational cohort that came of age during World War I. "Lost" in this context refers to the "disoriented, wandering, directionless" spirit of many of the war's survivors in the early postwar period. The term is also particularly used to refer to a group of American expatriate writers living in Paris during the 1920s. Gertrude Stein is credited with coining the term, and it was subsequently popularized by Ernest Hemingway who used it in the epigraph for his 1926 novel The Sun Also Rises: "You are all a lost generation".
    ellauri101.html on line 613: As the first social generation to have grown up with access to the Internet and portable digital technology from a young age, members of Generation Z have been dubbed "digital natives", even though they are not necessarily digitally literate. Moreover, the negative effects of screen time are most pronounced on adolescents compared to younger children. Compared to previous generations, members of Generation Z in some developed nations tend to be well-behaved, abstemious, and risk-averse. They tend to live more slowly than their predecessors when they were their age, have lower rates of teenage pregnancies, and consume alcohol less often, but not necessarily addictive drugs. Teenagers nowadays seem more concerned with academic performance and job prospects, and are better at delaying gratification than their counterparts from the 1960s, despite concerns to the contrary. On the other hand, sexting among adolescents has grown in prevalence though the consequences of this remain poorly understood. Meanwhile, youth subcultures have been quieter, though not necessarily dead.
    ellauri101.html on line 625: Some anticipate the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic will become this generation´s defining event, and have suggested the name Generation C either for those born during, or growing up during, the pandemic.
    ellauri101.html on line 639: Statistical projections from the United Nations in 2019 suggest that, by 2020, the people of Niger would have a median age of 15.2, Mali 16.3, Chad 16.6, Somalia, Uganda, and Angola all 16.7, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 17.0, Burundi 17.3, Mozambique and Zambia both 17.6. (This means that more than half of their populations were born in the first two decades of the twenty-first century.) Benin, Burundi, Ethiopia, Madagascar, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, Zambia, Yemen, and Timor-Leste had a median age of 17 in 2017.
    ellauri101.html on line 641: Russia´s population has been on the decline since the 1990s, following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Another reason for Russia's demographic decline is the nation's low life expectancy for men, at only 64 years in 2015, or 15 years less than that in Italy, Germany, or Sweden. This is due to a combination of unusually high rates of alcoholism, smoking, untreated cancer, tuberculosis, suicides, violence, and HIV/AIDS.
    ellauri101.html on line 649: Brazil´s fertility rate has fallen from 6.3 in 1960 to 1.7 in 2020. For this reason, the nation´s population is projected to decline by the end of the twenty-first century. According to a 2012 study, soap operas featuring small families have contributed to the growing acceptance of having just a few children in a predominantly Catholic country. However, Brazil continues to have relatively high rates of adolescent pregnancies, and the government is working to address this problem.
    ellauri101.html on line 674: Myös kitsch edustaa huonoa makua. Kitsch esiintyy parempana kuin mitä on. Myös camp on kliseistä kitschin tavoin, mutta camp on tietoisesti huonoa; campissa on ironiaa. Kitchissä ei ole ironiaa. Karkeasti ajatellen camp voi olla kitschiä lainausmerkeissä. Sellasissa KJJ-maisissa koukkusormissa majavamaisen virnistyxen kahta puolta.
    ellauri102.html on line 52: Daniel Yankelovich, Public Opinion Expert and UC San Diego Supporter, Has Died. Dubbed the “dean of American pollsters,” Yankelovich was perhaps best known for starting The New York Times/Yankelovich poll—now known as The New York Times/CBS News poll—and for co-founding the not-for-profit Public Agenda more than 40 years ago. He left a multimillion dollar bequest to endow the Yankelovich Center for Social Science Research. The Yankelovich Center is devoted to using social science to find practical solutions to the nation's most pressing problems. The most pressing problem now as ever is to increase young upward mobility. Yankelovizh was unwavering in his commitment to the American Dream which he saw as a promise to each generation of Americans that they too can improve their circumstances, their lives and gain economic security.
    ellauri102.html on line 64: American history and practical math
    ellauri102.html on line 108: After almost a century of moving upward, David has eventually gone down. Yankelovich is survived by his daughter, Nicole Mordecai, and her husband David; granddaughter Rachel Mordecai; sister Libby Schenkman and her children Fay and Max. In 1959, he married Hassmieg Kaboolian; that marriage ended in divorce. She was Armenian. He later married Mary Komarnicki, now deceased, and then Barbara Lee. More recently, he lived in La Jolla with his companion, Laura Nathanson. Laura got nothing, being just a companion. Neither did Kaboolian nor Komarnicki, nor Barbara Lee, for being utter failures, having wrong opinions, or wrong religion.
    ellauri102.html on line 129: Rugby player. They start to talk and eventually go back to his place. They start to kiss, and the man takes off his shirt. On his arm, he has a tattoo that says REEBOK.
    ellauri102.html on line 130: "What's that for?" the lady questions. "Oh, I have this so that when I'm on TV, people will see my tattoo, and Reebok pays me."
    ellauri102.html on line 131: Then the man takes off his trousers, and on his leg, he has a tattoo that says NIKE.
    ellauri102.html on line 133: when this tattoo is seen on TV."
    ellauri102.html on line 134: Then the man drops his underwear and on his wiener he has a tattoo that says AIDS.
    ellauri102.html on line 318: Jeffrey Sachs ja Paul Krugman hinkuu vaan lisää hiostamoja. Niiden mielestä just niissä hikiset vinkuintiaanit ja rullaturvat neekerit pääsee eroon uuvuttavasta maanviljelystä elintasohissin nappuloita painamaan. Taitaa äijät olla Israelin poikia. Niille on kolmas maailma täynnä käyttämättömiä filistealaisia. Joo oikeassa olin, Ruozin Akatemian palkizemia kusipäitä kuten Bob Zimmermann. Vetäkää vaan työlaisnaisten kusikassit päähänne ja tukehtukaa sinne, miljardöörien kumihanskat, liikemiesvainukoirat. Ruozi on erilainen kuin muut pohjoismaat, sanoo Mengele, se on pikku-Amerikka. Sixi siellä kuolee niin helvetisti matuköyhimyxiä. Loppuunkäytettyä apinamateriaalia.
    ellauri102.html on line 322: Krugman was born to a Russian Jewish family, the son of Anita and David Krugman. In 1922, his paternal grandparents immigrated to the United States from Brest, Belarus, at that time a part of Poland.
    ellauri102.html on line 351: Tän toteemiajattelun aivan huippu oli, kun sisäministeri Ohisalosta tehtiin kantelu, kun sille oli poliisi pimeällä tiellä turvallisuuden vuoxi antanut huomioliivin jossa luki POLIISI ja selässä oli vielä miekkataxin miekan kuva. "Ei kai sisäministerillä (joka on siis huom kaikkien poliisien emäpoliisi) ole oikeutta käyttää POLIISIn liiviä?" Voi helvetti, jo oli säälittävä yritys. Noi setämiehet koittaa KAIKKENSA etne sais ärrsyttävät naisministerit pälkähään. Mut tää oli kyllä todellinen pohjanoteeraus. Noi äijät ei ole ainoastaan tyhmänilkeitä, ne on vitun ILKEITÄ ja lisäxi vielä aivan helevetin TYHMIÄ. Niiltä pitäisi sahata poikki toi symboolifunktio. Leikata koko naurava nakki halki miekkataximiekalla.
    ellauri102.html on line 377: Huippujohtajien törkeet palkat kertoo niiden aikaansaamista kikyloikista. Ne on palkkioita massamurhista, saneeraajan korvauxia toisten selkänahasta otetusta riskistä. Optioiden arvo nousee kun porukoita lentää ulos kilometritehtaalle. Ja onhan näkyvästä johtoasemasta vakavia henkilökohtaisiakin riskejä, kuten näkyy seuraavasta videoklipistä.
    ellauri102.html on line 408: Klein opiskeli Toronton yliopistossa, mutta keskeytti opinnot kolmantena vuonna ja aloitti The Globe and Mailin palveluksessa. 23-vuotiaana hän siirtyi This Magazineen ja siitä myöhemmin That Magazineen.
    ellauri102.html on line 429: La tuerie de l'École polytechnique est une tuerie antiféministe en milieu scolaire qui a eu lieu le 6 décembre 1989 à l'École polytechnique de Montréal, au Québec (Canada). Marc Lépine (né Gamil Gharbi), âgé de vingt-cinq ans, ouvre le feu sur vingt-huit personnes, tuant quatorze femmes et blessant treize autres personnes (9 femmes et 4 hommes)[1], avant de se suicider. Ce féminicide de masse est perpétré en moins de vingt minutes à l'aide d'une carabine obtenue légalement. Il s'agit de la tuerie en milieu scolaire la plus meurtrière de l'histoire du Canada.
    ellauri102.html on line 463: The Problem: The problem with this ad campaign was the fact that is promoted “body shaming”. Many feminist groups noted that the wording of the ad insinuates that the body in the picture is the only “acceptable” beach body. This means that any other body type not like the one in the picture is “unready”.
    ellauri102.html on line 471: The Problem: Controversy for this ad campaign arose in many different ways. The first was the use of world leaders without their consent. In fact, one of the ads features Pope Benedict XVI kissing a top Egyptian imam which was quickly removed after being condemned by the Vatican.
    ellauri102.html on line 479: The Problem: During the time the advert was released, there were many protests and riots taking place in America over the #BlackLivesMatter campaign. The ad took a lot of “inspiration” from these protests and fundamentally undermined the whole point of the protests. In addition to this, the ad also received a lot of criticism for how Pepsi was responsible for “saving the day.”
    ellauri102.html on line 487: The Problem: As you can probably see from the advert above, the choice of words for this campaign was very poorly chosen. To make things worse, they specifically aimed the campaign at people in the Middle East which caused many people to call the advert racist.
    ellauri102.html on line 489: In addition to this, many right-wing groups started to promote the advert with some going as far as saying Nivea was the official alt-right antiperspirant. Eventually, Nivea released a statement about the ad and immediately withdrew it after realising the wording and context caused offence to many viewers.
    ellauri102.html on line 501: The Problem: The main issue with this campaign is that it came across as very anti-police to most of the general public. In fact, there were reports of people complaining and becoming very aggressive in the stores, resulting in LUSH having to call the police. Due to the negative reception of the ads, LUSH ended up pulling them and releasing an official statement on their website.
    ellauri102.html on line 507: The Problem: After Kaepernick refused to stand for the national anthem, many viewers became angry at him and viewed him as anti-American. The fact that Nike was using him in their ads made many people believe Nike was also anti-American. This sparked a lot of controversies online with many social media users posting pictures of themselves destroying Nike products, along with the hashtag #JustBurnIt.
    ellauri102.html on line 672:

    Ms. is a history-making brand with a clear mission.


    ellauri105.html on line 69: Psykopaatille kaikki pelit on pasiansseja. Seistään hedelmäpeliautomaatin edessä marketin tuulikaapissa ja painetaan nappuloita kuin Michael Jackson hississä.
    ellauri105.html on line 98: New Yorkerin Washingtonin kirjeenvaihtaja, juutalainen Susan Gasser (sori, freudilainen lipsahdus) Glasser on izekin kauhistunut, vaikka onkin olevinaan demokraattinen. Susan Glasser is the daughter of Lynn (née Schreiber) and Stephen Glasser (of Jewish ancestry). Susan on amerikkalainen vastine Hoblan yrmylle Laurénille. Se on ryssävihanen ja salaoikislainen taantumuxen edustaja. Se kirjottaa New Yorkerin varakkaiden lukijoiden mielixi:
    ellauri105.html on line 101: The result was the most avowedly liberal call to action I have ever heard a President make from that congressional podium. Unlike the longtime socialist Bernie Sanders, whom Biden beat in the Democratic primaries, he does not call himself a revolutionary. Unlike the self-styled populist Donald S. Trump, whom Biden beat in the general election, he does not call himself a disrupter. Were Congress to enact his proposals, Biden would end up as both.
    ellauri105.html on line 102: It’s early days yet, but this is where Biden’s true genius as a politician may lie: he has turned his likability into a moderating asset, suggesting that an ideological agenda when offered by a relatively non-ideological salesman does not sound all that threatening.
    ellauri105.html on line 126: Have the ego of an academic- relishing in the myth of their own intelligence, yet they have done nothing to actually earn that ego. They never went to school or tried to seriously study anything. So niche groups like this are perfect for them- they can act like big shot academics and get respect from other lost idiots and it fulfills their need to be considered “smart”.
    ellauri105.html on line 156: Niin sanottu historiallis-kriittinen metodi, joka lähestyy Raamatun tekstiä ilman Jumalan pelkoa ja sen myöntämistä, että lukija on ”pyhällä maalla”, on aiheuttanut tuhoa luterilaisuudessa. Kari Syreenistäkin tuli tapauskovainen, ja kazo kuinka kävi.
    ellauri105.html on line 286: Hes. 16:36 Näin sanoo Herra, Herra: Koska olet antanut riettautesi vuotaa ja olet paljastanut häpysi haureudessasi kaikille rakastajillesi ja kaikille kauhistaville kivijumalillesi, sekä lastesi veren tähden, jonka olet niille antanut,

    ellauri105.html on line 290: Hes 16:51. Niin ei myös Samaria ole tehnyt puoliakaan sinun syntejäs; mutta sinä olet paljon enemmin tehnyt sinun kauheuttas kuin hän, ettäs olet tehnyt sisares hyväksi kaikkein sinun kauhistustes suhteen, joita sinä tehnyt olet.

    ellauri105.html on line 331: 36. Ja Herra sanoi minulle: sinä ihmisen poika, etkö sinä Oholaa ja Oholipaa nuhdella tahdo? näytä heille heidän kauhistuksensa,

    ellauri105.html on line 332: Hes. 22:2 Sinä, ihmislapsi, etkö tuomitse, etkö tuomitse verivelkojen kaupunkia? Tee sille tiettäväksi kaikki sen kauhistukset

    ellauri105.html on line 349: 46. Sillä näin sanoo Herra, Herra: Nostatettakoon kansanjoukko heitä vastaan, ja heidät pantakoon kauhistukseksi ja ryöstettäköön.

    ellauri105.html on line 376: enšimmäisenä kuollehista ta on muailman
    ellauri105.html on line 379: miät riähistä.

    ellauri105.html on line 486: Tuohon alkuaikaan sisältyivät sitten armeijapalvelus ja erilaisia muita kuuliaisuustehtäviä luostarissa, josta hänet lähetettiin silloiseen - nykyisen Tšekin ja Slovakian tasavaltojen muodostamaan - Tšekkoslovakiaan luostarikouluun opiskelemaan kieliä. Tuolta matkalta kielitaitorepertuaariinsa "tarttui" tšekin lisäksi venäjä ja kirkkoslaavi. Venäjää hän oli opiskellut jo Suomessa ollessaan, mutta ilmeisesti hän ei ollut käynyt mitään suureellisimpia kieliopintoja missään. Hänen myöhempi laaja kielitaitonsa oli enemmänkin suuren lahjakkuuden tai kuten isä Sergius Colliander, joka oli hänet tavannut, sanoi, nerouden, aikaan saamaa oppimista. Hänen sanottiin osanneet lukuisia kieliä ja ilmeisesti hän osasi melko hyvin tai jopa sujuvasti oman äidinkielensä suomen lisäksi, ruotsia, venäjää, saksaa, ranskaa ja ainakin enemmän kuin auttavasti kreikkaa ja ilmeisesti myös jonkin verran tšekkiä ja latinaakin. Tätä laajaa kielitaitoaan hän käytti sitten myöhemmin hyväkseen mm. tekemällä käännöstöitä. Hän käänsi suomeksi useita maailmanhistoriallisia merkittäviä kaunokirjallisia teoksia, mm. Leo Tolstoin "Hadži Murat", Ivan Turgenevin "Savua", Ilja Ehrenburgin "Pariisin kukistuminen", mutta myös mm. Tšehovia ja monia muita merkittäviä kirjailijoita.
    ellauri105.html on line 492: Tuolle ajalle sisältyy myös varsin erikoinen ja omalla tavalla merkittävä ajanjakso niin koko Suomen ortodoksisen kirkon historiassa kuin varmasti myös Mefodin elämässä. Suomen ja Venäjän ortodoksisten kirkkojen "jääkausi", Suomen kirkon "melkein hajoaminen" kalenterikysymyksen edessä, munkkien karkottamiset ja pois muuttamiset ja monet muut tämän kaltaiset asiat. Kuusikymmentäluvulla ortodoksinen kirkko käytti jälleen Mefodin kielellistä lahjakkuutta hyväkseen ja hän toimi jonkin aikaa Kirkkojen Maailman Neuvoston (KMN) ekumeenisen komission jäsenenä Saksassa, jonne hän siirtyi pian pappismunkiksi vihkimisen jälkeen, mikä tapahtui vuonna 1968. Siirtyminen ulkomaille venäläisen ortodoksisen emigranttikirkon palvelukseen lienee ollut jonkinlainen turhautumisen ilmaus. Hän oli ennen sitä hävinnyt niukasti Heinäveden Valamon imugeenin eli luostarin johtajan vaalin ilmeisesti vain yhdellä äänellä. Kun samaan aikaan keskusteltiin koko Heinäveden luostarin lopettamisesta, koska vanhat munkit kuoluivat ja uusia ei saatu, hän pohti omia henkilökohtaisia ratkaisujaan. Myös hänen tehtäviensä suunnittelu - siis lähinnä hänen esimiestensä tekemät suunnitelmat - eivät oikein miellyttäneet ja siksi mahdollisesti hän päätti siirtyä ulkomaille.
    ellauri106.html on line 35: Some consider his best novel, My Life as a Man. He was awarded the 2010 National Humanities Medal by President Barack Obama at the White House in 2011. He died of congestive heart failure on May 22, 2018, at age 85. True — he never won the Nobel Prize for literature. D´oh.
    ellauri106.html on line 46: Philip Roth has not had much luck with biographers. Late in his life, furiously aggrieved after the failure of his marriage to the actress Claire Bloom and the publication of Bloom’s incendiary memoir of their years together, he asked a close friend, Ross Miller, an English professor at the University of Connecticut, to take on the task. Roth sent Miller lists of family members and friends he wanted to be interviewed, along with the questions that he felt should be asked. (“Would you have expected him to achieve success on the scale he has?”) It didn’t work out, for various reasons. Roth had wanted Miller to refute a familiar charge, “this whole mad fucking misogynistic bullshit!” that he felt flattened his long erotic history into one false accusation. But Miller came to his own conclusion. “There is a predatory side to both Sandy and Philip,” he told a cousin of Roth’s. (Sandy was Roth’s older brother.) “They look at women—I’m not gonna write about this—but they are misogynist. They talk about women in that way.”
    ellauri106.html on line 50: What may be more damning, though, is what the Bailey revelations don’t change. “It wasn’t just ‘Fucked this one fucked that one fucked this one,’ ” Roth once told Miller. Yet Bailey’s biography gives the impression that it was exactly like that: a long life spent writing book after book, and pursuing, then fleeing from, woman after woman after woman.
    ellauri106.html on line 52: It was not Bailey’s role as a biographer to pass judgment on his subject. He needed only try to understand him, and to make us understand him, too. “Why shouldn’t I be treated as seriously as Colette on this?” Roth had asked Miller, of the sex question. “She gave a blow job to this guy in the railway station. Who gives a fuck about that? . . . That doesn’t tell me anything. What did hand jobs mean to her?”
    ellauri106.html on line 54: So what did sex mean to Roth? Bailey’s book is so caught up in its obsessive cataloguing of paramours that the forest gets lost in an endless succession of trees. The place where Roth found insight into his own character was on the double bag. Over and over, in the novels, he transformed pro life. Bailey’s prurient, exhaustively literal version of that life reverses the effect, and the result is sadly diminishing. What he never grasps is Roth the artist, with his powers of imagination, of expression, of language—what made him worthy of biography at all.
    ellauri106.html on line 65: Philip Roth was the younger of the 2 boys of Herman Roth (1901–1989) and his wife Bess, nee Finkel (1904–1981). Both parents were assimilated American Jews of the second generation of immigrants. The maternal grandparents came from the area around Kiev, the Yiddish-speaking paternal grandparents, Sender and Bertha Roth, from Koslow in Galicia. Sender Roth had trained as a rabbi in Galicia and worked in a hat factory in Newark. Herman Roth, the middle of seven children and the first child in the United States, first worked in a factory after eight years of schooling, then became an insurance agent selling door-to-door life insurance. By his retirement he made it to the district director of Metropolitan Life. Philip Roth's brother, Sanford (Sandy) Roth (1927–2009), who was four years older than him, studied art at the Pratt Institute, became vice-president of the advertising agency Ogilvy & Mather in Chicago and made a name for himself as a painter after his "early retirement".
    ellauri106.html on line 67: In October 1956, Philip Roth met the secretary Margaret Martinson Williams in Chicago, whom he married in February 1959. The divorced mother of two children of completely different social origins, who was four years older than him, initially gave Roth the feeling of both a challenge and a liberation. Later, however, the problems and arguments in their relationship increased, which the writer dealt with in retrospect in works such as When She Was Good ( Lucy Nelson or Die Moral, 1967) or My Life As a Man (Mein Leben als Mann, 1974). In his autobiography The Facts (The Facts, 1988) Margaret even advanced as Josie Jensen to the “counter-self”, to the “arch enemy and nemesis ” of the author. The couple separated in 1963, but Margaret Roth refused to consent to a divorce. Five years later she died in a car accident.
    ellauri106.html on line 69: From 1958 onwards, the couple lived in New York on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, and in 1959 they spent seven months in Italy on a Guggenheim grant. Upon their return, they both settled in Iowa City, where Roth led the Writers' Workshop at the University of Iowa. The experiences in small-town Iowa far away from the American metropolises flowed into Roth's second novel Letting Go (Other People's Worries), which was published in 1962, but in contrast to Roth's previously published volume of short stories Goodbye, Columbus caused mixed reactions from critics. Stanley Edgar Hyman, for example, criticized weaknesses in the narrative structure of the novel, the two narrative parts of which are only superficially connected, but praised what he saw as "the keenest eye for the details of American life since Sinclair Lewis". Letting Go is also the first novel in which Roth, as in numerous later works, made the writings of his literary predecessors an integral part of the narrative, and is therefore often referred to as Roth's first "Henry James novel".
    ellauri106.html on line 71: In 1962, the same year Letting Go was published, Roth became Writer-in-Residence at Princeton University. After separating from his wife, Roth began a five-year psychoanalysis with the New York psychiatrist Hans J. Kleinschmidt, who published the case history anonymously in a medical journal in 1967 under the title The Angry Act: The Role of Aggression in Creativity. Roth traveled to Israel for the first time in June 1963. He participated in the American Jewish Congress, held discussions with Israeli intellectuals and Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion. From 1965 to 1977 Roth had a lectureship in comparative literature at the University of Pennsylvania.
    ellauri106.html on line 76: In 1987, in the loneliness of Connecticut, Roth experienced a breakdown caused by a sleeping pill with hallucinatory side effects. He made the experience, as well as the trial of the concentration camp guard John Demjanjuk in Jerusalem, whom he had followed as an observer, the starting point of the 1993 novel Operation Shylock, the encounter between a fictional Philip Roth and his doppelganger. The writer also felt increasingly isolated in London and returned to New York, where he moved into an apartment on the Upper West Side. He took over from 1988 to 1991 a professor of literature at Hunter College of the City University of New York. In 1990 he married his longtime partner Claire Bloom, but the marriage was divorced in 1994 after Roth's growing estrangement and severe depression, including a stay in a psychiatric clinic. Bloom dealt with the problematic relationship two years later in her memoir Leaving a Doll's House .
    ellauri106.html on line 80: In the early 2000s, Roth met the young assistant editor Lisa Halliday at his literary agency Andrew Wylie. A love affair developed from having lunch together, which culminated in a lifelong deep friendship. Halliday processed the love and friendship for Roth in the highly acclaimed autobiographical inspired novel Asymmetrie, which she completed in 2016. Roth, who read the manuscript, liked it.
    ellauri106.html on line 82: The story The Breast (Breast) from the following year, the literature professor David Kepesh transformed in into a female breast, awakens echoes of Franz Kafka, the Roth has for a special devotion among his literary models. The search for Kafka's traces led to his first visit to Prague in 1972, which was followed by annual trips until the author was refused an entry visa in 1977. In Czechoslovakia Roth got to know contemporary Czech literature and was in contact with Ivan Klíma, Milan Kundera and Ludvík Vaculík in particular.
    ellauri106.html on line 84: In October 2012, Roth announced to the French culture magazine Les Inrocks that Nemesis was his last book. At the age of 74 he began to reread his favorite authors such as Dostoyevsky, Turgenew, Conrad and Hemingway as well as his own works. He came to the conclusion that he had made the best of his possibilities and did not want to continue working as an author, read or talk about new literature.
    ellauri106.html on line 86: Instead of turning away from reality, Roth responded with satire, which he defined as "moral indignation translated into comic art". Roth's satire often arises from the disparity between ideals and reality, the naive disappointment of his heroes and the disillusionment of the American dream.
    ellauri106.html on line 100:

    Phillu-Rothista


    ellauri106.html on line 104: He enjoyed a robust childhood and was poplar in high school where he was a bright student but not quite diligent enough in his studies to win a prized full scholarship to Rutgers where he wanted to study law. Roth attended Rutgers University in Newark for a year, then transferred to Bucknell University in Pennsylvania, where he earned a B.A. magna cum laude in English and was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. He received a scholarship to attend the University of Chicago, where he earned an M.A. in English literature in 1955 and briefly worked as an instructor in the university´s writing program. Less prestigious Bucknell University in Pennsylvania was Roth’s fallback school. There he abandoned his vague dreams of becoming a lawyer for the underdog and turned his attention to writing.
    ellauri106.html on line 106: That same year, rather than wait to be drafted, Roth enlisted in the army. Roth enlisted in the Army that year to avoid being drafted and assigned to unpleasant duty like the infantry. Fortunately he suffered a back injury during basic training and was given a medical discharge. Who knows. He returned to Chicago in 1956 to study for a PhD in literature but dropped out after one term. It was a yeasty environment for a young writer. Saul Bellow was a contemporary and with some what similar backgrounds and interests they could not avoid being rivals. During that year he met a lovely shiksa waitress Margaret Martinson, a single woman with a small child. He was smitten. An intense, but often troubled relationship ensued. At the end of the year he dropped out of the U of C and headed to the University of Iowa to teach in its creative writing program. None the less, whatever he may have said, Roth was not happy there, perhaps because the semi-rural Midwesterness of Ames was alien to him. After a while with Martinson in tow he moved on to a similar position at Princeton, another WASP bastion but one with even more prestige. Everyone who knew him recognized Roth as an early comer. He later continued his academic career at the University of Pennsylvania, where he taught comparative literature before retiring from teaching in 1991. Roth started teaching literature in the late 1960s at the University of Pennsylvania. The 1969 feature film adaptation of Goodbye, Columbus coincided with the publication of Portnoy’s Complaint, which soon became a best-seller amid controversy for its prurient content. (Those who've read it will likely not forget Portnoy's "love affair" with mom´s slab of liver in the fridge.)
    ellauri106.html on line 122: Philip Roth was born in Newark, New Jersey, on March 19, 1933, and grew up at 81 Summit Avenue in the Weequahic neighborhood. He was the second child of Bess (née Finkel) and Herman Roth, an insurance broker. Roth's family was Jewish, and his parents were second-generation Americans. Roth's father's parents came from Kozlov near Lviv (then Lemberg) in Austrian Galicia; his mother's ancestors were from the region of Kyiv in Ukraine. Viulunsoittajia katolta.
    ellauri106.html on line 124: He graduated from Newark´s Weequahic High School in or around 1950. In 1969 Arnold H. Lubasch wrote in The New York Times, "It has provided the focus for the fiction of Philip Roth, the novelist who evokes his era at Weequahic High School in the highly acclaimed Portnoy´s Complaint. Besides identifying Weequahic High School by name, the novel specifies such sites as the Empire Burlesque, the Weequahic Diner, the Newark Museum and Irvington Park, all local landmarks that helped shape the youth of the real Roth and the fictional Portnoy, both graduates of Weequahic class of ´50." The 1950 Weequahic Yearbook calls Roth a "boy of real intelligence, combined with wit and common sense." He was known as a clown during high school.
    ellauri106.html on line 126: A committed atheist, Philip Roth feared only one form of posthumous punishment: being trapped for all eternity in a hostile biography. In 2007, Roth, echoing a similar quip from Oscar Wilde, said, “Biography gives a new dimension of terror to dying.” Roth’s had already been the subject of a harsh and unforgiving portrait in Leaving a Doll’s House (1996), the memoirs of his former wife, the actor Claire Bloom. As John Updike noted in The New York Review of Books, “Claire Bloom, as the wronged ex-wife of Philip Roth, shows him to have been, as their marriage rapidly unraveled, neurasthenic to the point of hospitalization, adulterous, callously selfish, and financially vindictive.” This crisp summary ended Roth’s friendship with Updike, even after Updike made clear he was recapping Bloom’s book and not affirming its accuracy.
    ellauri106.html on line 128: In a private note about Bloom’s book, Roth asserted, “Another writer my age awaiting a biography and awaiting death (which is worse?) might not care. I do.” Roth put enormous efforts into finding a biographer who could contest Bloom’s account. His first choice was the academic Ross Miller, but the novelist had a falling out with his biographer as the would-be James Boswell resisted the imperious dictates of the modern Dr. Johnson. Roth ended up describing his relationship with Miller as “my third bad marriage.” After unsuccessfully trying to rope in friends such as Hermione Lee and Judith Thurman to tell his life story, Roth settled on Blake Bailey, the author of highly regarded biographies of troubled male American writers, notably Richard Yates and John Cheever.
    ellauri106.html on line 146: Sanford Roth, more affectionately known as "Sandy," lived with flair and boldness in his roles as an accomplished artist, a successful advertising executive spanning three decades, and a smooth dancer some likened to Fred Astaire.
    ellauri106.html on line 148: A mid-1970s transplant to Chicago from New York, he rose in the competitive advertising world to become senior vice president and creative director of Ogilvy & Mather, where his major account was Sears Home Fashions, friends and family said. But in 1983, he gave it all up to devote himself to painting full time.
    ellauri106.html on line 150: "He remembered his last ride down [the elevator] in the old Standard Oil Building and how he got to the bottom, and [he said] he left his old identity at the beginning of the ride," said his wife, Dorene Marcus. He never looked back, she said.
    ellauri106.html on line 152: Mr. Roth, 81, who also taught painting and drawing at his West Loop studio until his health deteriorated in 2007, died of congestive heart failure Wednesday, May 6, at his Chicago home.
    ellauri106.html on line 156: Eli Rosenthal, his former roommate at the time, said the two met in a fashion illustrating class. "I looked over at him and I said, 'Wow, this guy can really draw and I want to be like him,'" he said. "He always walked around with a sketch pad. He said it was great for picking up girls."
    ellauri106.html on line 158: Mr. Roth was first married in 1954 and shortly thereafter adopted two boys, Seth and Jonathan. He struggled with raising both young children after his wife died in 1970. Not Dorene, but an ex, not named.
    ellauri106.html on line 160: He is most remembered for his generous spirit, quick wit and love of 1930s and 1940s culture -- including Cole Porter and Frank Sinatra, to which his mother and he danced in the kitchen, as well as Li´l Abner cartoons and an era catchphrase: "Watch it, Toots."
    ellauri106.html on line 162: In addition to his wife and sons, Mr. Roth is survived by his brother, the well-known writer Philip Roth, and two grandchildren.
    ellauri106.html on line 169:
    Philip Roth with his mother at the beach 1935

    ellauri106.html on line 177: Roth was far more prolific than either of the novelists he was frequently lumped with—29 full length novels and a dazzling debut novella over nearly 50 years. His output was also more diverse in style and topic than either of the other while reaping critical praise, armloads of awards, and commercial success. Yet at the core of his varied output were common threads—a Jewish identity with which he was not always comfortable but could not deny, a sense of being profoundly American— “if I am not American what am I”—a, a sex drive that was often creepily compulsive, and the world observed by fictional doppelgangers for the author, or sometimes the author himself as a fictional character.
    ellauri106.html on line 179: Today the lengthy obituaries are all laudatory. Tomorrow or the next day I can safely predict that the backlash will begin with harshly critical essays. Leading the way will be Feminists critics who will denounce the whole cabal of elite white men as the custodians of the literary cannon. More pointedly they will charge Roth with toxic masculinity and misogyny and will come loaded for bear with plenty of quotes from his work. They will also have the example and testimony of his two ex-wives, both of whom showed up thinly disguised in his novels—a Margaret Martinson in When She Was Good and actress Clare Bloom in I Married a Communist. Bloom penned her own bitter exposé of their 14-year-long relationship and four year marriage in he memoir Leaving the Doll’s House.
    ellauri106.html on line 180: Not far behind will be some Jewish critics who always found Roth’s portraits embarrassing for their relentless sexuality and discomfort with aspects of the culture that were at odds with his identity as an American. Others were angered at his voraciously espoused atheism—“I’m exactly the opposite of religious, I’m anti-religious. I find religious people hideous. I hate the religious lies. It’s all a big lie.” Some Jewish critics hounded him from the beginning of his career. Rabbi Gershom Scholem, the great kabbalah scholar, said Portnoy’s Complaint was more harmful to Jews than The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. And Roth was heckled and booed at an early appearance at Yeshiva University which stunned and shocked the author.
    ellauri106.html on line 182: Roth fought back skewering one of his harshest critics, Irving Howe who he cast as supercilious Milton Appel in 1983’s The Anatomy Lesson with a typically uproarious rant:
    ellauri106.html on line 193: “In 1949, when I was sixteen, I stumbled on Thomas Wolfe, who died at thirty-eight in 1938, and who made numerous adolescents aside from me devotees of literature for life. In Wolfe, everything was heroically outsized, whether it was the voracious appetite for experience of Eugene Gant, the hero of his first two novels, or of George Webber, the hero of his last two. The hero's loneliness, his egocentrism, his sprawling consciousness gave rise to a tone of elegiac lyricism that was endlessly sustained by the raw yearning for an epic existence—for an epic American existence. And, in those postwar years, what imaginative young reader didn't yearn for that?” -- Philip Roth
    ellauri106.html on line 195: Thomas Wolfe (1900–1938) was born in Asheville, North Carolina, and educated at the University of North Carolina and Harvard University. He taught English at New York University and traveled extensively in Europe and America. Wolfe created his legacy as a classic American novelist with Look Homeward, Angel; Of Time and the River; A Stone, a Leaf, a Door; and From Death to Morning. Wolfe's influence extends to the writings of Beat Generation writer Jack Kerouac, and of authors Ray Bradbury and Philip Roth, among others. He remains an important writer in modern American literature, as one of the first masters of autobiographical fiction, and is considered North Carolina's most famous writer. Ei mitään pientä.
    ellauri106.html on line 202: Sir Gawain and the Green Knight is a late 14th-century Middle English chivalric romance. The author is unknown; the title was given centuries later. It is one of the best known Arthurian stories. It is an important example of a chivalric romance, which typically involves a hero who goes on a quest which tests his prowess.
    ellauri106.html on line 203: It describes how Sir Gawain, a knight of King Arthur´s Round Table, accepts a challenge from a mysterious "Green Knight" who dares any knight to strike him with his axe if he will take a return blow in a year and a day. Gawain accepts and beheads him with his blow, at which the Green Knight stands up, picks up his head and reminds Gawain of the appointed time. There is a test involving the lord and the lady of the castle where he is a guest.
    ellauri106.html on line 236: My Life as a Man is not nearly so consistently enjoyable as Portnoy's Complaint, but it is the product of a more painful period in the author's life. In his autobiography, Roth reveals that much of Tarnopol´s life is based on his own experiences; for example, Roth´s destructive marriage to Margaret Martinson, which is portrayed through Tarnopol´s relationship with the character of Maureen.
    ellauri106.html on line 243: The women in the writer´s life provided inspiration for characters in his novels both positive and negative. PHILIP Roth was famed for his observations on life - some of which he gathered from his own relationships with his ex-wives.
    ellauri106.html on line 262: Author Philip Roth was prolific and often made blackly comic reflections on his own life and relationships. When did they get divorced?
    ellauri106.html on line 273: Roth claimed his first wife, Margaret Martinson, used someone else’s urine sample to persuade him she was pregnant and trick him into marrying her.
    ellauri106.html on line 287: Arthur Dimmesdale is a fictional character in the 1850 romance The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne. A Puritan minister, he has fathered an illegitimate child, Pearl, with Hester Prynne and considers himself unable to reveal his sin.
    ellauri106.html on line 332: In 1840, the family settled in Hamilton, Ohio, where his father oversaw a Whig newspaper and followed Swedenborgianism.
    ellauri106.html on line 333: He began at an early age to help his father with typesetting and printing work, a job known at the time as a printer´s devil.
    ellauri106.html on line 334: In 1852, his father arranged to have one of his poems published in the Ohio State Journal without telling him.
    ellauri106.html on line 339:
    "I hope the time is coming when not only the artist, but the common, average man, who always ´has the standard of the arts in his power,´ will have also the courage to apply it, and will reject the ideal grasshopper wherever he finds it, in science, in literature, in art, because it is not ´simple, natural, and honest,´ because it is not like a real grasshopper. But I will own that I think the time is yet far off, and that the people who have been brought up on the ideal grasshopper, the heroic grasshopper, the impassioned grasshopper, the self-devoted, adventureful, good old romantic card-board grasshopper, must die out before the simple, honest, and natural grasshopper can have a fair field."
    ellauri106.html on line 351: That Dylan line was also the title of a position paper distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago on June 18, 1969. This founding document called for a "White fighting force" to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement" and other radical movements to achieve "the destruction of U.S. imperialism and form a classless communist world".
    ellauri106.html on line 352: No wonder class conscious Phil was flustered. He wanted to wear his gloves to dinner.
    ellauri106.html on line 361: He is perhaps known for his proclamations during that period that "violence is as American as cherry pie" and that "If America don´t come around, we´re gonna burn it down." He is also known for his autobiography, Die Nigger Die! He is currently serving a life sentence for murder following the shooting of two Fulton County Sheriff´s deputies in 2000.
    ellauri106.html on line 367: Documents from the Kerner Commission investigation show that he completed his speech at 10 pm July 24, then walked a woman home and was allegedly shot by a deputy sheriff without provocation.
    ellauri106.html on line 372: Marcuse opiskeli germanistiikkaa ja kirjallisuushistoriaa pääaineinaan, filosofiaa ja kansantaloustiedettä sivuaineinaan, aluksi kaksi vuotta Berliinissä, sitten kaksi vuotta Freiburg im Breisgaussa. Hän väitteli kirjallisuuden alalta tohtoriksi 1922.
    ellauri106.html on line 386: A committed atheist, Philip Roth feared only one form of posthumous punishment: being trapped for all eternity in a hostile biography. In 2007, Roth, echoing a similar quip from Oscar Wilde, said, “Biography gives a new dimension of terror to dying.” Roth’s had already been the subject of a harsh and unforgiving portrait in Leaving a Doll’s House (1996), the memoirs of his former wife, the actor Claire Bloom. As John Updike noted in The New York Review of Books, “Claire Bloom, as the wronged ex-wife of Philip Roth, shows him to have been, as their marriage rapidly unraveled, neurasthenic to the point of hospitalization, adulterous, callously selfish, and financially vindictive.” This crisp summary ended Roth’s friendship with Updike, even after Updike made clear he was recapping Bloom’s book and not affirming its accuracy.
    ellauri106.html on line 388: In a private note about Bloom’s book, Roth asserted, “Another writer my age awaiting a biography and awaiting death (which is worse?) might not care. I do.” Roth put enormous efforts into finding a biographer who could contest Bloom’s account. His first choice was the academic Ross Miller, but the novelist had a falling out with his biographer as the would-be James Boswell resisted the imperious dictates of the modern Dr. Johnson. Roth ended up describing his relationship with Miller as “my third bad marriage.” After unsuccessfully trying to rope in friends such as Hermione Lee and Judith Thurman to tell his life story, Roth settled on Blake Bailey, the author of highly regarded biographies of troubled male American writers, notably Richard Yates and John Cheever.
    ellauri106.html on line 407: Ruth was a Catholic.1 And not only did he attend Catholic school growing up, his parents actually signed custody of Ruth over to the Catholic missionaries at St. Mary’s Industrial School for Boys in Baltimore when he was seven-years-old.2 So Babe was quite literally raised by the Catholic Church.
    ellauri106.html on line 409: Ruth has spoken about his childhood and his faith. He had a conversion of sorts. As a youngster, he was a delinquent–chewing tobacco and drinking and swearing. He says he had no faith in God before he was sent to the Catholic school and that the biggest lesson he got from the experience there was learning that “God was Boss.”
    ellauri106.html on line 421: And this, too, is surely true of religion. In prehistoric times, Homo sapiens was deeply endangered. Early humans were less fleet of foot, with fewer natural weapons and less well-honed senses than all the predators that threatened them. Moreover, they were hampered in their movements by the need to protect their uniquely immature young - juicy meals for any hungry beast. We had less natural protection against repeated changes of climate than other species - yet we survived. Human spirituality would have played an important part.
    ellauri106.html on line 425: As well as the social cohesion that spirituality and early religious beliefs must have brought to threatened groups of humans, they must also have been a valuable mechanism to persuade humans to struggle against the odds. Surely, human spirituality is deeply embedded in our genes. Victor Frankl, in his observations about survival in Auschwitz, argued that in his view, only those inmates who had some spiritual sense, some idea that there was a power above that could see their suffering, found the strength and resolution to survive the terrible dehumanisation and deprivation of the concentration camps.
    ellauri106.html on line 434: Roth’s works have no Talmud, no Jewish philosophy, no mysticism, no religion, and as a self-professed atheist, Roth has consistently opted against reinforcing the tenets of Judaism as an author such as eg Cynthia Ozick does (whodat?). Roth writes out of hatred more often than not, and his work is open to the charge of anti-Semitism.
    ellauri106.html on line 440: As a result, like Leo Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilych(1886), a retelling of Ivan Ilych’s life that Roth mentions and a work that marks Tolstoy’s return to Christianity of a certain sort, American Pastoral is Roth’s return to Judaism — but also only of a sort. Without Jehovah for starters. Tolstoy was banned from Orthodox Church in 1901 for his anarcho-pacifism.
    ellauri106.html on line 448: Ei, ei näytä hissa olevan mihkään matkalla, eikä se ole loppukaan vaikka Fukuyama väitti niin, se pyörii vaan ja on pelkkää kaaosta: you win some, then you lose some. Arjalainen jutku ei tätä ymmärrä vaan uskoo Amerikan unelmaan, vaikka Newarkin vandaalit jo repii katukiviä ja heittää niillä urheita yrittäjiä, sellasia kuin arjalainen ize, hanskatehtaan omistaja.
    ellauri106.html on line 461: Philip Roth forbade any Jewish rituals from being performed at his funeral.
    ellauri106.html on line 462: “What is being done to silence this man?” an American rabbi asked in a 1963 letter to the Anti-Defamation League. God´s mills grind slowly, but all is well that ends well.
    ellauri106.html on line 464: In his final years, however, Roth was embraced by American Jews. In 1998 he won the Jewish Book Council’s Lifetime Literary Achievement Award and in 2014, the Jewish Theological Seminary, Conservative Judaism’s flagship educational institution, bestowed him with an honorary doctorate.
    ellauri106.html on line 467: “This was absolutely the last appearance I will make on any public stage, anywhere,” said Roth, although on Wednesday news broke that he will appear as an interview guest on Comedy Central’s “Colbert Report” in July.
    ellauri106.html on line 474: There was no metaphysical dimension to Philip. He just flatly refused to believe in it. He thought it was fairy tales,” Bailey said. he was happy to be Jewish, Bailey said. “He liked Jews as human beings. He liked their warmth, he liked his male friends. “If the Western world views itself through the lens of the modern Jewish experience, it is in large measure due to the novels, novellas and short stories of Philip Roth,” wrote David Roskies, a JTS Jewish literature professor, in a note to the class of 2014.
    ellauri106.html on line 478: The president of the Philip Roth Society, Aimee Pozorski, said that Roth and JTS are not so different in their values. Three of his books were honored with the American Jewish Book Award, and in 1998 he won the Jewish Book Council’s Lifetime Literary Achievement Award.
    ellauri106.html on line 499: O’Day carries with him at all times a dictionary and thesaurus, and he trains his disciples to do the same.
    ellauri106.html on line 508: Modernization moved from “the sacred to the profane side of historical time”: Rather than a free market or contractual society, modern America became ‘capitalist,’ no longer rational, interdependent, modern, and liberating, but backward, greedy, anarchic, and impoverishing.
    ellauri106.html on line 516: Vietnam was, in fact, the inevitable result of America’s romantic liberalism, the natural byproduct of President Truman’s announcement in 1947 that “The free peoples of the world look to us for support in maintaining their freedoms.” In practice, this meant the propping up of each and every anti-communist regime, however unfree it might be.
    ellauri106.html on line 527: “Comically agnostic,” an apt description, I think, of much of Roth’s later work. With all of history suddenly exposed as fictional constructs, artists were freed to interrogate it with impunity, making it the stuff of parodic play.
    ellauri106.html on line 529: Without the sure theoretical footing that orthodox Marxism provided those of Benjamin’s generation, Roth, like many who used to kinda identify themselves with the late-20th century left, has been set adrift amid the wreckage of multinational capital, techno-militarism, and the information and cultural revolutions. In his trilogy, Roth offers a complex and beautifully-rendered document of the final decades of the “American Century,” but it is one that, like its narrator, Nathan Zuckerman, ultimately throws up its hands in despair, surrendering the complexities of life and the possibility of positive change en lieu of aesthetic and ascetic remove.
    ellauri106.html on line 531: Confident from its victory over Fascism and emboldened by the subsequent economic boom, America jelled behind what social theorist Jeffrey Alexander has called modernization or romantic liberalism. As has been the case throughout much of Roth’s career, the socio-political touchstone of his American Trilogy is the “patriotic war years” and the consensus culture that blossomed immediately afterward. “Everything was in motion,” Zuckerman says in the opening pages of American Pastoral. “The lid was off. Americans were to start over again, en masse, everyone in it together”. Reagan-propagandaa.
    ellauri106.html on line 539: Puritan work ethic is what Roth, through his frequent allusions to New England’s storied past, points to as the source of America’s greatest triumphs—universal education, economic improvement, and those old standbys, rugged individualism and the “American Dream”.
    ellauri106.html on line 541: Roth’s disdain for the American Communist Party surpasses even his contempt for the reactionaries who hunted down its members during the McCarthy era:
    ellauri106.html on line 548: The fundamental problem of history for those on the far left is, of course, its failure to unravel as Marx had predicted it would. The Great Depression did not incite proletarian revolution; the Soviet experiment did not result in a model of Socialist Utopia; America’s social, political, and economic structures did not collapse under the weight of late capitalism. Far from it, in fact.
    ellauri106.html on line 556: Before his death from congestive heart failure on Tuesday, he made no secret of his contempt for Donald Trump, was instinctively liberal in most respects, and thought of himself as a Roosevelt Democrat. Yet his political novels have a nagging MAGA aftertaste. Successful, decent, hardworking men, who in the time of our fathers would have been appreciated, are mindlessly destroyed by modern women as the embodiments of a degenerate society. Roth’s desire, ultimately, is the same as Reagan’s: an impossible return to the promised land of modernization. Not by coincidence, the final chapter of The Human Stain is titled, “The Purifying Ritual.” Puhdistuxesta kuumuu kaikki anaalis-obsessiiviset henkilöt Hitleristä Rothiin ja Sofi Oxaseen. Puhamaan! Äiitii mä oon vallmiiis! Tuu PYYHKIMÄÄN!
    ellauri106.html on line 621: Mailer was hugely popular at his peak, but now he’s probably best known for that whole stabbing-his-second-wife awkwardness; Updike is regularly derided as “a misogynist”; and Bellow’s female characters are often, at best, thinly drawn, or full-on bitches and shrews. Now, inevitably, it’s Roth’s turn. Roth’s women were either “vicious and alluring” or “virtuous and boring”.
    ellauri106.html on line 624: Roth’s ex-wife, Claire Bloom, wrote about their relationship in her memoir, Leaving A Doll’s House, 25 years ago. You could also read Roth’s not-exactly-contrite reaction to Bloom’s complaints, his 1998 novel, I Married A Communist, in which the protagonist’s vicious wife was clearly based on Bloom.
    ellauri106.html on line 628: “Roth’s misogyny infuses everything that he writes,” according to Meg Elison, a novelist recently described by the Times as “re-examining Roth”. This is typical of the all-or-nothing approach that is popular today, where if you don’t like everything about a public figure, then you can’t like anything. (Uskokaa tai älkää tää mielipide tulee naiselta. Se oli varmaan käynyt modernin kirjallisuuskritiikin koulua.)
    ellauri106.html on line 635: In his baffled grief, Levov is taunted by a female confederate of his daughter’s who stridently berates him as a capitalist pig for a dozen pages, then tries to seduce him with corny porno lines like, “I bet you’ve got yourself quite a pillar in there ... the pillar of society.” When he resists, she shows him her vagina, and “rolling the labia lips outward with her fingers, [exposes] to him the membranous tissue veined and mottled and waxy with the moist tulip sheen of flayed flesh.”
    ellauri106.html on line 648: Joo just tämä porukka on erittäinkin nahisevaa narsissipenkkiä. No tota Kafkaa en ole lukenut, mutta muut on tuttuja, ja läpeensä ällöjä. Juuri samanlaisia pettyneitä narsisteja kuin hra Roth.
    ellauri106.html on line 663: Another specimen of his wit is furnished by the English translation of the
    ellauri106.html on line 703: Phillu meinasi siteerata "yleisölle" Conradia Flaubertia ja Henry Jamesta, mutta pelkäsi Maureenin taas syöxyvän sisään ja huutamaan VALHETTA! Ei se ole yhtään niin hyvä mies kuin antaa ymmärtää vaan pelkkä PASKIAINEN! So what? Paskiaisia olivat myös Conrad Flaubert ja Henry James. Kauhistuneita pelkkiä pelkoja joka mies.
    ellauri107.html on line 41: Aluksi hänen aiheensa olivat historiallisia, mutta myöhemmät työt ovat eroottisesti painottuneita.
    ellauri107.html on line 42: Among his most popular works are genre paintings conveying an atmosphere of intimacy and veiled eroticism.
    ellauri107.html on line 53: Pepun isä tuli kaupasta päivän tilin kaa, kaatoi kitaan Martinin kuin tärpätin ja asettui laiskanlinnaan kuuntelemaan Lyle Vania ja nyytisiä. I remember when I was little growing up in Queens, NY, Lyle would end his nightly broadcast with the words "Goodnight little redheads....Everyone".
    ellauri107.html on line 84: "With clarity and with crudeness, and a great deal of exuberance, the embryonic writer who was me wrote these stories in his early 20s, while he was a graduate student at the University of Chicago, a soldier stationed in New Jersey and Washington, and a novice English instructor back at Chicago following his Army discharge...In the beginning it amazed him that any literate audience could seriously be interested in his story of tribal secrets, in what he knew, as a child of his neighborhood, about the rites and taboos of his clan—about their aversions, their aspirations, their fears of deviance and defection, their embarrassments and ideas of success."
    ellauri107.html on line 91: Neil Klugman is an intelligent, working-class army veteran and a graduate of Rutgers University who works as a library clerk. He falls for Brenda Patimkin, a wealthy Radcliffe student who is home for the summer. They meet by the swimming pool at Old Oaks Country Club in Purchase, New York, a private club that Neil visits as a guest of his cousin Doris. Neil phones her and asks for a date. She does not remember him but agrees. He waits as she finishes a tennis game which only ends when it gets too dark to play.
    ellauri107.html on line 95: After a few dates, Brenda persuades her father to invite Neil to stay with them for two weeks. This angers her mother, who feels that she should have been asked instead. Neil enjoys being able to sneak into Brenda's room at night but has misgivings over her entitled outlook, which is reflected in her spoiled and petulant younger sister, and her naive brother Ron, who misses the hero worship he enjoyed as a star basketball player at Ohio State University. Neil is astonished when Brenda reveals that she does not take birth control pills or use any other precautions to avoid pregnancy. She angrily rejects Neil's concerns. He prepares to leave, but she decides to persuade him to stay by agreeing to get a diaphragm.
    ellauri107.html on line 97: At the end of his stay, Neil attends Ron's wedding to Harriet, who was his college sweetheart from Ohio. Brenda returns to Radcliffe in the fall, keeping in touch by telephone. She invites Neil to come up to spend a weekend at a Boston hotel. However, once they are in the hotel room, Brenda tells Neil she just received letters telling her that her mother found her diaphragm and that her parents know about their affair. They argue, with Neil asking why she left it to be found unless she wanted it to happen. Siding with her parents, Brenda ends the affair as abruptly as she allowed it to commence. Neil walks out of the hotel, leaving her alone in the room.
    ellauri107.html on line 106: In 1963, Mailer wrote two regular columns: one on religion called "Responses and Reactions" for Commentary and one called "Big Bite" for Esquire. Mailer also divorced from his third wife Jeanne Campbell and met Beverly Bentley who would become his fourth wife. Bentley had known Hemingway in Spain and briefly dated Miles Davis in New York before she met Mailer. Bentley and Mailer took a long car trip, notably visited an army buddy "Fig" Gwaltney in Arkansas, viewed an autopsy of a cancer victim, watched the Sonny Liston and Floyd Patterson fight in Las Vegas, and spent time with the Beats in San Francisco. While in San Francisco, Mailer "walked narrow ledges, testing his nerve and balance".
    ellauri107.html on line 108: Mailer's has similarities with Rojack: They both attended Harvard, served in World War II, had an interest in political office, did violence to wife, walked narrow ledges, and appeared on talk shows. Mailer seems to have drawn on his stabbing his second wife Adele Morales in Rojack's murdering of his wife Deborah. Mailer did not deny these similarities, but stated:
    ellauri107.html on line 110: Rojack is still considerably different from me — he's more elegant, more witty, more heroic, his physical strength is considerable, and at the same time he's more corrupt than me. I wanted to create a man who was larger than myself yet somewhat less successful. That way, ideally, his psychic density, if I may use a private phrase, would be equal to mine — and so I could write from within his head with comfort.
    ellauri107.html on line 114: Rojack vomits over the balcony at a party and considers suicide. Rojack has sex with Ruta in her room. Later Rojack sees Cherry again. He is drawn to her. She and Rojack flirt and kiss. They have sex, and after emptying the load Rojack realizes he has fallen in love with her. Rojack goes back to Cherry and they make love. Cherry tells her life story viz her finally having a vaginal orgasm with Rojack. Rojack and nigger Shago fight. He returns to Cherry's only to find out from Roberts she has been killed. No more vaginal orgasms from her. Rojack travels to Las Vegas where he wins big at the tables, paying off all his debts. He imagines speaking with Cherry in Heaven before he heads south to Guatemala and the Yucatán. Y asi finaliza esta historia.
    ellauri107.html on line 122: For example, when Rojack murders his wife, he compares it to the killing of the Germans.
    ellauri107.html on line 124: Mailer attempted to use existentialism to excuse Rojack's misogynistic exploration as his "sexistentialist project". Rojack's victims are women and a black man, appropriate objects of the white male's "dominant wrath".
    ellauri107.html on line 125: His partial Jewish ancestry and his 'liberal' views to the contrary, Rojack is the last surviving white man as murderous hero.
    ellauri107.html on line 148: Twelve years ago I saw him through his last love. A young person less than half his age whose family strongly disapproved of the association and who evidently grew to disapprove of it herself. It was a trauma that might have plowed Philip under and that he told aslant in Exit Ghost, the novel dedicated to me (!). A couple of failed attempts at courtship followed, boring and painful for the women involved. Then he closed the door on heteroerotic life entirely. He’d learned how to be an elderly gentleman who behaves correctly. He joined the ranks of the impotent.
    ellauri107.html on line 154: "Philosophical generalization is completely alien to me—some other writer’s work. I’m a philosophical illiterate." Yep, his philosophy was solipsistic semitism. He had no need to read about it, he wrote the books.
    ellauri107.html on line 156: "I have, for instance, never—I repeat, never—written a word about women in general. This will come as news to my harshest critics, but it’s true. Women, each one particular, appear in my books. But womankind is nowhere to be found.” They just happen to be assholes one and all. Men are so much nicer friends.
    ellauri107.html on line 158: “Found it!” he announces. “Opened the book and skimmed for 10 minutes and there it was. Goes like this, and you’re ideally situated to hear it: ‘A man that is born falls into a dream like a man who falls into the sea. If he tries to climb out into the air as inexperienced people endeavor to do, he drowns. The way is to the destructive element submit yourself, and with the exertions of your hands and feet in the water make the deep, deep sea keep you up … In the destructive element immerse.’ This has been my credo, the lifeblood of my books. I knew it was from Lord Jim but didn’t know where. All I had to do was put myself in a trance and I found it: ‘In the destructive element immerse.’ It’s what I’ve said to myself in art and, woe is me, in life too. Submit to the deeps. Let them buoy you up.”
    ellauri107.html on line 169: Nathaniel Hawthorne (July 4, 1804 – May 19, 1864) was an American novelist, dark romantic, and short story writer. His works often focus on history, morality, and religion.
    ellauri107.html on line 171: He was born in 1804 in Salem, Massachusetts, to Nathaniel Hathorne and the former Elizabeth Clarke Manning. His ancestors include John Hathorne, the only judge from the Salem witch trials who never repented his involvement in the witch hunt. He entered Bowdoin College in 1821, was elected to Phi Beta Kappa in 1824, and graduated in 1825. He published his first work in 1828, the novel Fanshawe; he later tried to suppress it, feeling that it was not equal to the standard of his later work.[2] He published several short stories in periodicals, which he collected in 1837 as Twice-Told Tales. The next year, he became engaged to Sophia Peabody. He worked at the Boston Custom House and joined Brook Farm, a transcendentalist community, before marrying Peabody in 1842. The couple moved to The Old Manse in Concord, Massachusetts, later moving to Salem, the Berkshires, then to The Wayside in Concord. The Scarlet Letter was published in 1850, followed by a succession of other novels. A political appointment as consul took Hawthorne and family to Europe before their return to Concord in 1860. Hawthorne died on May 19, 1864, and was survived by his wife and their three children.
    ellauri107.html on line 173: Much of Hawthorne's writing centers on New England, many works featuring moral metaphors with an anti-Puritan inspiration. His fiction works are considered part of the Romantic movement and, more specifically, dark romanticism. His themes often center on the inherent evil and sin of humanity, and his works often have moral messages and deep psychological complexity. His published works include novels, short stories, and a biography of his college friend Franklin Pierce, the 14th President of the United States.
    ellauri107.html on line 177: David Kesterson of North Texas State University delivered his lecture “Hawthorne and Melville” at the Phillips Library on September 23, 2000, giving the website one of its finest pieces of scholarship. Here are some excerpts from his talk:
    ellauri107.html on line 179: The zenith of [Hawthorne and Melville’s] relationship was reached . . . when Moby-Dick was published in middle November of 1851 and was dedicated to Hawthorne [“To Nathaniel Hawthorne: In token of my admiration for his genius”]. Hawthorne’s letter to Melville [at the time], like most of those to his friend, has not been preserved, but Melville’s answer on November 17 . . . speaks of the effect Hawthorne’s letter had upon him, in terms characteristic of his impassioned utterances:
    ellauri107.html on line 181: I felt pantheist then—your heart beat in my ribs and mine in yours, and both in God’s. . . . Whence come you, Hawthorne? By what right do you drink from my flagon of life? And when I put it to my lips—lo, they are yours and not mine. . . . Hence this infinite fraternity of feeling. . . . Ah! It’s a long stage, and no inn in sight, and night coming, and the body cold. But with you for a passenger, I am content and can be happy. . . .
    ellauri107.html on line 183: As [Arlin]Turner says in analyzing this letter, “[Melville] was aware, it can be assumed, of the inclusiveness and interwoven imagery of his letter, and no less aware of the meaning behind the imagery. The same awareness can be assumed on the part of Hawthorne”. Edwin Haviland Miller, who interprets Melville’s affection for Hawthorne as in part sexual, says that in this passage, “the most ardent and doubtlessly one of the most painful he was ever to write, he candidly and boldly laid bare his love”. Miller goes on to say that “when Hawthorne retreated from Lenox, he retreated from Melville. How Hawthorne felt his reticences keep us from knowing, but his friend wrestled with the problems and nature of the relationship almost until the end of his life”. Turner says only that “there is evidence through the remaining forty years of Melville’s life that he thought he had been rebuffed by Hawthorne, and that he felt a genuine regret for his loss.”
    ellauri107.html on line 187: suggestive panegyric [in his 1850 review of Hawthorne’s Mosses from an Old Manse], [that] Melville writes . . . “already I feel that this Hawthorne has dropped germinous seeds into my soul. He expands and deepens down, the more I contemplate him; and further and further, shoots his strong New England roots in the hot soil of my Southern soul”.
    ellauri107.html on line 193: Hawthorne is much more explicit in regard to same sex relationships and perhaps alludes to Melville’s wooing of him in his 1852 novel The Blithedale Romance. In excerpting that work for the website, I introduced it as follows:
    ellauri107.html on line 195: In the following excerpts from Hawthorne's The Blithedale Romance, the Hawthorne-like character, poet and narrator Miles Coverdale, and the Melville-like character, passionate monomaniac Hollingsworth suggest Melville's influence on the novel. The first person narrator, a young man who joins a major enterprise with mostly adventure-seeking motives, certainly calls to mind narrator Ishmael in Melville's Moby-Dick. The dark and brawny Hollingsworth, bearing a physical resemblance to Melville, cares for Coverdale and seeks his partnership, moreover, in an intensity that seems to parallel Melville's evident affection for and desire for intimacy with Hawthorne. The sharp, mysterious break in the relationships between the two authors and the fictional pair constitute yet another likeness.
    ellauri107.html on line 200: Coverdale describes Hollingsworth's "dark complexion, his abundant beard, and the rude strength with which his features seemed to have been hammered out of iron, rather than chiselled or moulded from any finer or softer material." He adds that in Hollingsworth's "gentler moods, there was a tenderness in his voice, eyes, mouth, in his gesture, and in every indescribable manifestation, which few men could resist, and no woman."
    ellauri107.html on line 204: Coverdale notes that "there was something of the woman moulded into the great, stalwart frame of Hollingsworth; nor was he ashamed of it, as men often are of what is best in them, nor seemed ever to know that there was such a soft place in his heart. . . . I besought Hollingsworth to let nobody else enter the room, but continually to make me sensible of his own presence by a grasp of the hand, a word, -- a prayer, if he thought good to utter it . . . ."
    ellauri107.html on line 212: Coverdale concludes the tale of Zenobia's hopeless love for Hollingsworth and enigmatically adds, "It suits me not to explain what was the analogy that I saw, or imagined, between Zenobia's situation and mine; nor, I believe, will the reader detect this one secret, hidden beneath many a revelation which perhaps concerned me less."
    ellauri107.html on line 214: Actually, the reader would have to be remarkably obtuse not to recognize the sexual tension between Coverdale and Hollingsworth. If only we could know what Melville thought when he read it! Certainly, Melville was aware that Brook Farm in Roxbury, Massachusetts, which Blithedale represents, had enjoyed the company of Hawthorne as a communal society member for most of 1841. Perhaps he also knew that substantial portions of Coverdale’s first person narration are taken directly from Hawthorne’s Brook Farm journals, and he would certainly know better than we the extent to which the novel may also represent allusions to Hawthorne’s and his experiences together during the year before the publication of Blithedale.
    ellauri107.html on line 216: Let me return briefly to Dr. Kesterson for his observation of the circumstances surrounding the creation of Moby-Dick. He notes . . . (Creation of Moby DICK! A dead giveaway! Tästä on jo ollut puhetta.)
    ellauri107.html on line 218: The major occurrence in Melville’s life . . . during the writing of Moby-Dick was the growing friendship with Nathaniel Hawthorne . . . . We are reminded that throughout the fall and winter of 1850, and summer of 1851, Hawthorne and Melville were visiting and writing to each other. . Hawthorne encapsulating their conversation [of August 1, 1851] by writing in his journal: “Melville and I had a talk about time and eternity, things of this world and of the next, and books, and publishers, and all possible and impossible matters, that lasted pretty deep into the night . . . .”
    ellauri107.html on line 222: Melville’s concluding words are from his “Monody,” a poem that is thought to express his deep personal loss when learning of Hawthorne’s death in 1864:
    ellauri107.html on line 228: And now he’s left to set his seal – Ease me, a little ease, my song!
    ellauri107.html on line 229: By wintry hills his hermit-mound the sheeted snow-drifts drape,
    ellauri107.html on line 238: Same sex relationships in the all male environment of Billy Budd’s British as well as Herman Melville’s American ships are understood. As former First Lord of the Admiralty, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once witheringly quipped, British naval tradition might well be equated with sodomy. Although Billy Budd lacks the “marriage” rites of Moby-Dick’s Ishmael and Queequeg, itcontains endearments for “Handsome Sailor” Billy that leave little doubt as to many of his mates’ ardent feelings toward him. The old Dansker on the British warship originates “Baby Budd,” also shortened to “Baby,” in reference to Billy, “the name by which the foretopman eventually became known aboard ship.” Readers also hear “one Donald” addressing Billy as “Beauty.”
    ellauri107.html on line 242: In surveying Billy, “sometimes [Claggart’s] melancholy expression would have in it a touch of soft yearning, as if [he] could even have loved Billy but for fate and ban.” Evidently, Claggart has not fully disguised his private appreciation of Billy; but, because he believes something forbids any future for such feelings, he hardens his heart more and more fiercely toward the object of his desire. What “fate” and what “ban” does his misguided imagination perceive? Do their roles on the ship or elsewhere in society somehow doom any intimacy between them? Or does Claggart just presume Billy could never reciprocate his feelings? Might the Master at Arms simply despise sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular and, as a result, find himself driven all the more mad by his uncontrollable “yearning”? Whatever the accurate diagnosis, it is clear that Claggart distorts any positive feelings he possesses for Billy into negative ones with terrible consequences.
    ellauri107.html on line 244: Claggart’s repressed, closeted attraction to Billy finds parallels with some interpretations of Hawthorne’s evident spurning of Melville’s too intimate attentions and Hawthorne’s character in The Blithedale Romance Coverdale’s similar rejection of the invitation from Holingsworth to be his “friend of friends, forever.” For Melville, Hawthorne’s Arthur Dimmesdale’s agonizing acknowledgement of adultery must have seemed a stunning parallel with what later generations would term “coming out of the closet.” Whether Hawthorne himself were a closeted gay man, it is clear that Melville was relatively open in his affections for the senior author and that those affections were somehow turned away and seem to have left a wound that never fully healed. The evils of the closet constitute a subtext in Billy Budd that may well have brought to its author’s mind the sad sundering of his closeness with Nathaniel Hawthorne.
    ellauri107.html on line 246: Billy Budd provides an implicit indictment of the culture, whether military or civil, that encourages the kind of closet where a Claggart so readily succumbs to his “depravity according to nature.” Captain Vere likewise shows a closed, perhaps also “closeted” mind as ready prey for the phenomenon of evil. In Vere’s presence, as Billy is struck dumb by Claggart’s accusation, Claggart is struck dead by a single blow from Billy’s fist, the only response he can muster to defend himself. Although Vere cherishes Billy as “an angel of God” and knows him to be innocent of Claggart’s charges, he resists any bending of rules to protect him against the harshest of consequences for his act of insubordination. Ruthlessly silencing the dictates of his heart, “sometimes the feminine in man,” Vere effects what Claggart’s malice alone could not -- Billy’s total destruction.
    ellauri107.html on line 250: Billy is first the victim of Claggart’s closet, one with similarities to the Roy Cohn and J. Edgar Hoover kinds that project self-loathing onto their targets. Vere’s condition, on the other hand, while containing degrees of benevolence, ultimately emerges as more deadly than Claggart’s. Associating his heart with his hated feminine side, Vere crushes down his capacity for love and compassion with a thoroughly brutal, Night-of-the-Long-Knives sort of intolerance. He, who would never have initiated Billy’s demise, will not permit his own ardor to soften his inflexible judgment, as that would evidently equate with irresolution and weakness. After all, he might rationalize, he is the Captain and the Captain has an image to uphold – right? Forget justice; forget humane treatment; maintaining machismo holds precedence over all! And the tragic result: mindless, meaningless, totally unnecessary suffering and loss on the altar of nothing less than evil itself!
    ellauri107.html on line 260: Speculation about Cohn's sexuality intensified following his death from AIDS in 1986. In a 2008 article published in The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin quotes Roger Stone: "Roy was not gay. He was a man who liked having sex with men. Gays were weak, effeminate. He always seemed to have these young blond boys around. It just wasn't discussed. He was interested in power and access." Stone worked with Cohn beginning with the Reagan campaign during the 1976 Republican Party presidential primaries.
    ellauri107.html on line 262: Cohn always denied his homosexuality in public, however, in private he was open about his sexual orientation with a few select friends. He had several long-term boyfriends over the course of his life, including a man called Russell Eldridge who died from AIDS in 1984, and for the last two years of his life, Cohn was partnered to a man 30 years his junior called Peter Fraser. Fraser inherited Cohn's house in Manhattan after Cohn died from AIDS in 1986.
    ellauri107.html on line 268: Taylor says that after Roth announced his retirement from writing in 2012, he stopped making art, but he still wrote, producing a manuscript of over a thousand pages whose purpose was to air grudge after grudge. Taylor comments that the underside of Roth's greatness swarmed with grievances time had not assuaged.
    ellauri107.html on line 274: He was infamously resentful of being denied the Nobel Prize in literature: “He took to calling it the Anybody-But-Roth Prize,” Taylor reports. And past slights consumed him. Taylor notes that Roth couldn’t stop relitigating his first marriage, and that “despite her death she needed further – no, endless – pulverization.”
    ellauri107.html on line 289: Ilmeisesti Phillu halus olla joku narsistinen herra vapahtaja, sixi se haki ongelmaisia naisia. Kohta se oli niiden pahin ongelma. "Maureen" oli rähisevä, "Susan" kyynelehtivä. Susanin calpurniamainen äiskä arvioi että jutkurunoilija oli hysteerinen. Oikeassa oli. Hysteerinen eikä vähän vaan läpeensä mulkero. Siltä puuttuu vilpittömyyttä mutta sensijaan vilpillisyyttä sillä on pyykkikorikaupalla. Ei luottoa eikä uskoa mutta kosoltikin huonoa uskoa, malfoy. Kukas muu se oli josta tuli sanottua ihan samaa? Ainaskin toi Joe Burgo, narsistiexpertti joka nautti ize kuvailemastaan taudista.
    ellauri107.html on line 298: Peppu kohotteli 60-luvulla jutkukulmakarvoja kuin torakka ampiaisten keittiössä ja loisi varakkaiden olohuoneessa. Ryyppi Susanin vuosikertaviinejä ja ikävystyi sen seurassa. Susan oli ihan liian vaatimaton ja totteli liian kesysti. Peppu oli tottunut juutalaisten rähisevään meininkiin. Se ois tarvinnut jonkun joka panee sen oikeasti kuriin. Siitä se ois tykännyt. Ei sillä muuten edes eteen ottanut. Joku sen tumpelointiin tympääntynyt tyttö kysyi onko totta että se yritti katkaista hinttikierteen? Kalikka kalahti ja Peppu älähti, koitti riisua tytön sukkahousuja. Ei siitä mitään tullut, ja tyttö jätti ovenrakoon viestin seuraaville tulijoille: ken tästä käy saa kaiken toivon heittää. Hui kauhistus: Puo harkizi jopa Suomeen muuttoa. Onnexi ei vakavissaan, meillähän on jo vahva ääni oikealta Ben Zyskoviz.
    ellauri107.html on line 303: Peppu alkaa ikävystyneenä haastaa riitaa Susanin kanssa, sen on päästävä rähisemään jollekulle.
    ellauri107.html on line 315: Mieheksi kasvaminen on jatkuva prosessi. Se mikä ei tapa, vahvistaa. Minusta. Ei ehkä sinusta. Olen viisikymppinen ho- bibliofiili Tampereelta. Olen valmistunut Tampereen yliopistosta filosofian maisteriksi 1995. Opetan historiaa, filosofiaa ja yhteiskuntaoppia Tampereen yhteiskoulun lukiossa. Kaikki mielipiteet ovat omiani, tai no, mun ize lainaamia mm. Philip Rothilta.
    ellauri107.html on line 366: Hawthornen tapaisia ihmisiä, viisaita vainajia. Hiljaisuus korkoa korolle kasvavana omaisuutena. Siinä mies joka osasi panna töpinäxi. 3 gallonaa luomumaitoa. Tietämätön hengen syvyyxistä. Kuoleman ahistuxen aikaansaama sexuaalinen kaipaus. Jyrkät jenkkiposkipäät ja leuka ja pitkä ehdottoman naisellinen kaula. Siitä näki kuinka leikkisä hiän osasi olla. Vaikka lukutaidoton ja totaalisen erilainen kuin hiäntä Viagran voimalla bylsivä sivistynyt proffa jonka isoon päähän mahtui kahden kuolleen kielen sanakirjat.
    ellauri107.html on line 395: The antihero of Roth’s 1995 novel Sabbath’s Theatre blinds us with his astonishing misogyny, his exponential misanthropy, his audacious nihilism - and yet he makes us care shit. The depraved Mickey Sabbath, the hero, anti-hero and villain of Philip Roth’s 1995 tour d'Eiffel, Sabbath’s Theatre. Just what he does to deserve this affection over the course of 450 bile-filled pages is hard to fathom. He virtually copies that bête noire of creative writing courses, the unsympathetic character. To discover such a monstrous creation on the page is a shock.
    ellauri107.html on line 398: He’s a supernova of sin, or a Roman candle, or a fire cracker at the very least, blazing away in Roth’s virtuoso paragraphs; blinding us with his astonishing misogyny, his exponential misanthropy, his audacious nihilism.
    ellauri107.html on line 400: Where does Roth pull it out of (the expression is apt)? Sabbath had decided to defy his own imminent demise by attempting to have as much sex as possible. As the book begins, Sabbath finds himself “six short years from seventy”, with “the game just about over”. What, 64? That is young! Phil was 62 in 1995. Is that when his pecker started to sag?
    ellauri107.html on line 402: In crisis over whether he’s a man or nuts. I'd say nuts. He is a sexual extremist and erotomaniac, a sociopath and wannabe paedophile, rummaging in the knicker drawer of his best friend’s teenage daughter. A habitual liar, a graveyard onanist, a childless despiser of families and couples; a joyous micturator over all laughter, hope, goodness and wholesomeness (a peculiarly American obsession: see also David Lynch), Sabbath entertains us with his negativity.
    ellauri107.html on line 404: Aren’t his hysterical riffs on death dangerously close to how we all feel when facing up to the Grim Reaper? "We all", yeah. I hate it when allsorts of teaming idiots use this "we all".
    ellauri107.html on line 406: The author’s sanctioned biographer, Claudia Roth Pierpont, comments that the Drenka “enlarges the sense of female possibility, and that’s what heroines are for”. Of course, Roth rather ruins this reverence by having Sabbath masturbate on her grave (and he’s not the only character who does), but then Phil always has to spoil the party. He's a real party pooper is Phil.
    ellauri107.html on line 418: In Babbitt (1922), Sinclair Lewis created a living and breathing man with recognizable hopes and dreams, not a caricature. To his publisher, Lewis wrote: “He is all of us Americans at 46, prosperous, but worried, wanting — passionately — to seize something more than motor cars and a house before it's too late.” George F. Babbitt's mediocrity is central to his realism; Lewis believed that the fatal flaw of previous literary representations of the American businessman was in portraying him as “an exceptional man.”
    ellauri107.html on line 422: George F. Babbitt was an archetype of the American city dwellers who touted the virtues of Republicanism, Presbyterianism, and absolute conformity because "it is not what he feels and aspires that moves him primarily; it is what the folks about him will think of him. His politics is communal politics, mob politics, herd politics; his religion is a public rite wholly without subjective significance." Mencken said that Babbitt was the literary embodiment of everything wrong with American society.
    ellauri107.html on line 431: Philip Teir on iloisenahistunut suomenruozalainen Philip Roth-pehmoeläin. Surku Yniäinen suden hännillä.
    ellauri107.html on line 439: “Now you look here! The first thing you got to understand is that all this uplift and flipflop and settlement-work and recreation is nothing in God's world but the entering wedge for socialism. The sooner a man learns he isn't going to be coddled, and he needn't expect a lot of free grub and, uh, all these free classes and flipflop and doodads for his kids unless he earns 'em, why, the sooner he'll get on the job and produce—produce—produce! That's what the country needs, and not all this fancy stuff that just enfeebles the will-power of the working man and gives his kids a lot of notions above their class. And you—if you'd tend to business instead of fooling and fussing—All the time! When I was a young man I made up my mind what I wanted to do, and stuck to it through thick and thin, and that's why I'm where I am to-day, and—Myra! What do you let the girl chop the toast up into these dinky little chunks for? Can't get your fist onto 'em. Half cold, anyway!”
    ellauri107.html on line 444: In the comedy Andria (“The Girl of Andros”) by the Roman poet Terentius, Simo uses it to comment on the tears of his son Pamphilus at the funeral of a neighbor to his interlocutor Sosias. At first he was of the opinion that these were an expression of special sympathy and was pleased about it. But when he discovered that the deceased's pretty sister was also a member of the funeral procession, he realized that his son's emotion was only faked to get closer to him: hinc illae lacrumae, haec illast misericordia. ("Hence his tears, that is the reason for his pity!").
    ellauri107.html on line 448: “Lots of news. Terrible big tornado in the South. Hard luck, all right. But this, say, this is corking! Beginning of the end for those fellows! New York Assembly has passed some bills that ought to completely outlaw the socialists! And there's an elevator-runners' strike in New York and a lot of college boys are taking their places. That's the stuff! And a mass-meeting in Birmingham's demanded that this Mick agitator, this fellow De Valera, be deported. Dead right, by golly! All these agitators paid with German gold anyway. And we got no business interfering with the Irish or any other foreign government. Keep our hands strictly off. And there's another well-authenticated rumor from Russia that Lenin is dead. That's fine. It's beyond me why we don't just step in there and kick those Bolshevik cusses out.”
    ellauri107.html on line 469: He had, with indignation at the criticism of Zenith, skimmed through a report in which the notorious pessimist Seneca Doane, the radical lawyer, asserted that to throw boys and young girls into a bull-pen crammed with men suffering from syphilis, delirium tremens, and insanity was not the perfect way of educating them. He had controverted the report by growling, “Folks that think a jail ought to be a bloomin' Hotel Thornleigh make me sick. If people don't like a jail, let 'em behave 'emselves and keep out of it. Besides, these reform cranks always exaggerate.” That was the beginning and quite completely the end of his investigations into Zenith's charities and corrections; and as to the “vice districts” he brightly expressed it, “Those are things that no decent man monkeys with. Besides, smatter fact, I'll tell you confidentially: it's a protection to our daughters and to decent women to have a district where tough nuts can raise cain. Keeps 'em away from our own homes.”
    ellauri107.html on line 473: But Babbitt was virtuous. He advocated, though he did not practise, the prohibition of alcohol; he praised, though he did not obey, the laws against motor-speeding; he paid his debts; he contributed to the church, the Red Cross, and the Y. M. C. A.; he followed the custom of his clan and cheated only as it was sanctified by precedent; and he never descended to trickery—though, as he explained to Paul Riesling:
    ellauri107.html on line 474: “Course I don't mean to say that every ad I write is literally true or that I always believe everything I say when I give some buyer a good strong selling-spiel. You see—you see it's like this: In the first place, maybe the owner of the property exaggerated when he put it into my hands, and it certainly isn't my place to go proving my principal a liar! And then most folks are so darn crooked themselves that they expect a fellow to do a little lying, so if I was fool enough to never whoop the ante I'd get the credit for lying anyway! In self-defense I got to toot my own horn, like a lawyer defending a client—his bounden duty, ain't it, to bring out the poor dub's good points? Why, the Judge himself would bawl out a lawyer that didn't, even if they both knew the guy was guilty! But even so, I don't pad out the truth like Cecil Rountree or Thayer or the rest of these realtors. Fact, I think a fellow that's willing to deliberately up and profit by lying ought to be shot!”
    ellauri107.html on line 478: Jovially they whooped back—Vergil Gunch, the coal-dealer, Sidney Finkelstein, the ladies'-ready-to-wear buyer for Parcher & Stein's department-store, and Professor Joseph K. Pumphrey, owner of the Riteway Business College and instructor in Public Speaking, Business English, Scenario Writing, and Commercial Law. Though Babbitt admired this savant, and appreciated Sidney Finkelstein as “a mighty smart buyer and a good liberal spender,” it was to Vergil Gunch that he turned with enthusiasm. Mr. Gunch was president of the Boosters' Club, a weekly lunch-club, local chapter of a national organization which promoted sound business and friendliness among Regular Fellows. He was also no less an official than Esteemed Leading Knight in the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, and it was rumored that at the next election he would be a candidate for Exalted Ruler. He was a jolly man, given to oratory and to chumminess with the arts.
    ellauri107.html on line 480: This watch shows how poor I am
    ellauri107.html on line 481: Say, Sid,” Babbitt turned to Finkelstein, the buyer, “got something wanta ask you about. I went out and bought me an electric cigar-lighter for the car, this noon, and—”
    ellauri107.html on line 487: They grinned and went into the Neronian washroom, where a line of men bent over the bowls inset along a prodigious slab of marble as in religious prostration before their own images in the massy mirror. Voices thick, satisfied, authoritative, hurtled along the marble walls, bounded from the ceiling of lavender-bordered milky tiles, while the lords of the city, the barons of insurance and law and fertilizers and motor tires, laid down the law for Zenith; announced that the day was warm-indeed, indisputably of spring; that wages were too high and the interest on mortgages too low; that Babe Ruth, the eminent player of baseball, was a noble man; and that “those two nuts at the Climax Vaudeville Theater this week certainly are a slick pair of actors.”
    ellauri107.html on line 495: “Well we know—not just in the Bible alone, but it stands to reason—a man who doesn't buckle down and do his duty, even if it does bore him sometimes, is nothing but a—well, he's simply a weakling. Mollycoddle, in fact! And what do you advocate? Come down to cases! If a man is bored by his wife, do you seriously mean he has a right to chuck her and take a sneak, or even kill himself?”
    ellauri107.html on line 501: “Look here, Stan; let's get this clear. You've got an idea somehow that it's you that do all the selling. Where d' you get that stuff? Where d' you think you'd be if it wasn't for our capital behind you, and our lists of properties, and all the prospects we find for you? All you got to do is follow up our tips and close the deal. The hall-porter could sell Babbitt-Thompson listings! You say you're engaged to a girl, but have to put in your evenings chasing after buyers. Well, why the devil shouldn't you? What do you want to do? Sit around holding her hand? Let me tell you, Stan, if your girl is worth her salt, she'll be glad to know you're out hustling, making some money to furnish the home-nest, instead of doing the lovey-dovey. The kind of fellow that kicks about working overtime, that wants to spend his evenings reading trashy novels or spooning and exchanging a lot of nonsense and foolishness with some girl, he ain't the kind of upstanding, energetic young man, with a future—and with Vision!—that we want here. How about it? What's your Ideal, anyway? Do you want to make money and be a responsible member of the community, or do you want to be a loafer, with no Inspiration or Pep?”
    ellauri107.html on line 505: This advance in civilization could be carried too far, Babbitt perceived. Noel Ryland, sales-manager of the Zeeco, was a frivolous graduate of Princeton, while Babbitt was a sound and standard ware from that great department-store, the State University. Ryland wore spats, he wrote long letters about City Planning and Community Singing, and, though he was a Booster, he was known to carry in his pocket small volumes of poetry in a foreign language. All this was going too far. Henry Thompson was the extreme of insularity, and Noel Ryland the extreme of frogginess, while between them, supporting the state, defending the evangelical churches and domestic brightness and sound business, were Babbitt and his friends.
    ellauri107.html on line 507: Put your John Hancock on that line! To sign one's name on a document or other item. John Hancock, an influential figure in the American Revolution, is known for his especially large and legible signature on the Declaration of Independence. As soon as you put your John Hancock on these papers, you'll be the proud owner of a brand new car!
    ellauri107.html on line 510: In the living-room, in a corner of the davenport, Ted settled down to his Home Study; plain geometry, Cicero, and the agonizing metaphors of Comus.
    ellauri107.html on line 511: “I don't see why they give us this old-fashioned junk by Milton and Shakespeare and Wordsworth and all these has-beens,” he protested. “Oh, I guess I could stand it to see a show by Shakespeare, if they had swell scenery and put on a lot of dog, but to sit down in cold blood and READ 'em—These teachers—how do they get that way?”
    ellauri107.html on line 513: Babbitt looked up irritably from the comic strips in the Evening Advocate. They composed his favorite literature and art, these illustrated chronicles in which Mr. Mutt hit Mr. Jeff with a rotten egg, and Mother corrected Father's vulgarisms by means of a rolling-pin. With the solemn face of a devotee, breathing heavily through his open mouth, he plodded nightly through every picture, and during the rite he detested interruptions. Furthermore, he felt that on the subject of Shakespeare he wasn't really an authority. Neither the Advocate-Times, the Evening Advocate, nor the Bulletin of the Zenith Chamber of Commerce had ever had an editorial on the matter, and until one of them had spoken he found it hard to form an original opinion. But even at risk of floundering in strange bogs, he could not keep out of an open controversy.
    ellauri107.html on line 514: “I'll tell you why you have to study Shakespeare and those. It's because they're required for college entrance, and that's all there is to it! Personally, I don't see myself why they stuck 'em into an up-to-date high-school system like we have in this state. Be a good deal better if you took Business English, and learned how to write an ad, or letters that would pull. But there it is, and there's no talk, argument, or discussion about it! Trouble with you, Ted, is you always want to do something different! If you're going to law-school—and you are!—I never had a chance to, but I'll see that you do—why, you'll want to lay in all the English and Latin you can get.”
    ellauri107.html on line 518: He snatched from the back of his geometry half a hundred advertisements of those home-study courses which the energy and foresight of American commerce have contributed to the science of education. The first displayed the portrait of a young man with a pure brow, an iron jaw, silk socks, and hair like patent leather. Standing with one hand in his trousers-pocket and the other extended with chiding forefinger, he was bewitching an audience of men with gray beards, paunches, bald heads, and every other sign of wisdom and prosperity. Above the picture was an inspiring educational symbol—no antiquated lamp or torch or owl of Minerva, but a row of dollar signs. The text ran:
    ellauri107.html on line 554: With the threat of serious illness hanging over her, Milly decides to travel to Venice with Mrs. Stringham. Aunt Maud, Kate and Densher follow her. At a party Milly gives in her Venice palazzo (the older Palazzo Barbaro, called "Palazzo Leporelli" in the novel), Kate finally reveals her complete plan to Densher: he is to marry Milly so that, after her presumably soon-to-occur death, he will inherit the money they can marry on. Densher had suspected this was Kate's idea, and he demands that she consummate their affair before he will go along with her plan.
    ellauri107.html on line 609: Jos haluaa perusteellisesti ymmärtää ja oikein arvioida avioliiton sisäistä rakennetta ja sukupuolten suhdetta, pitää heittää ainakin lyhyt kazaus sen kehityxen historiaan, ennen kaikkea johtoajatuxiin joiden mukaan se on määritelty. Sikäli kuin voidaan selvittää, aikojen alussa nainen oli miehen omaisuutta kaikilla Euroopan sivistyneillä kansoilla. Ostamalla tai vaihtamalla mies sai täyden omistusoikeuden häneen ja hänen lapsiinsa. Tästä syystä hän saattoi vapaasti menetellä naisen kanssa, esim. myydä, karkoittaa tai ottaa kilpailijoita, samaan aikaan kuin nainen jäi hänen suhteensa täysin vaille oikeuxia, pysyvästi sidottuna ja lojaaliuteen ja kuuliaisuuteen velvoitettuna. Sellaisena miehen ja naisen suhde on yxinkertaisesti vahvemman oikeutta: primitiivistä patriarkaalisuutta. Sitä on yhä olemassa sivistymättömillä kansoilla kyseenalaistamattomana lakina.
    ellauri108.html on line 44: Juu esses aar romahti globaalin kapitalismin taloudellisessa painostuxessa 80-luvun lopussa. Onkohan juu es of ei menossa samaa tietä vastaavista syistä? Siellä alkaa olla aivan vitusti mamuporukoita jotka on aika tyytymättömiä, kun Amerikan unelmahissi ei enää nouse kerroxiin. Ne rabotajet, lukee hissin päälle liimatussa lapussa.
    ellauri108.html on line 61: Hebrew names of God include Yehováh, Yahweh, Yahveh, Yahu, Yah. Yah yah de ä Gösta här! ylade Gösta Grahn i telefonen hos mig år 1976. He should not have taken God's name in his mouth in vain. Rangaistuxexi se passitettiin Kanadaan ja joutui ottaan uudexi etunimexeen Gus. Yeah yeah this is Gus here speaking ei kyllä kuulosta yhtä coolilta. Sori vaan.
    ellauri108.html on line 65: This short form of the name occurs 50 times in the text of the Hebrew Bible, of which 24 form part of the phrase "Hallelujah". In the Christian King James Version (1611) there is a single instance of JAH (capitalized), in Psalm 68:4. An American Translation (1939) and the New King James Version "NKJV" (1982) follows KJV in using Yah in this verse.
    ellauri108.html on line 73: In the King James Version of the Christian Bible, the Hebrew יהּ is transliterated as "JAH" (capitalised) in only one instance: "Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his name JAH, and rejoice before him". An American Translation renders the Hebrew word as "Yah" in this verse. In the 1885 Revised Version and its annotated study edition, The Modern Reader's Bible, which uses the Revised Version as its base text, also transliterates "JAH" in Psalms 89:8 which reads,"O LORD God of hosts, who is a mighty one, like unto thee, O JAH? and thy faithfulness is round about thee".
    ellauri108.html on line 92: Rastas are monotheists, worshipping a singular God whom they call Jah. The term "Jah" is a shortened version of "Jehovah", the name of God in English translations of the Old Testament. Rastafari holds strongly to the immanence of this divinity; as well as regarding Jah as a deity, Rastas believe that Jah is inherent within each individual. This belief is reflected in the aphorism, often cited by Rastas, that "God is man and man is God", and Rastas speak of "knowing" Jah, in the biblical sense, rather than simply "believing" in him. In seeking to narrow the distance between humanity and divinity, Rastafari embraces mysticism.
    ellauri108.html on line 94: Jesus is an important figure in Rastafari. However, practitioners reject the traditional Christian view of Jesus, particularly the depiction of him as a white European, believing that this is a perversion of the truth. They believe that Jesus was a black African, and that the white Jesus was a false god. Many Rastas regard Christianity as the creation of the white man; they treat it with suspicion out of the view that the oppressors (white Europeans) and the oppressed (black Africans) cannot share the same God. Many Rastas take the view that the God worshipped by most white Christians is actually the Devil, and a recurring claim among Rastas is that the Pope is Satan or the Antichrist. Rastas therefore often view Christian preachers as deceivers and regard Christianity as being guilty of furthering the oppression of the African diaspora, frequently referring to it as having perpetrated "mental enslavement".
    ellauri108.html on line 98: From its origins, Rastafari was intrinsically linked with Haile Selassie, the Emperor of Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974. He remains the central figure in Rastafari ideology, and although all Rastas hold him in esteem, precise interpretations of his identity differ. Understandings of how Haile Selassie relates to Jesus vary among Rastas. Many, although not all, believe that the Ethiopian monarch was the Second Coming of Jesus, legitimising this by reference to their interpretation of the nineteenth chapter of the Book of Revelation. By viewing Haile Selassie as Jesus, these Rastas also regard him as the messiah prophesied in the Old Testament, the manifestation of God in human form, and "the living God". Some perceive him as part of a Trinity, alongside God as Creator and the Holy Spirit, the latter referred to as "the Breath within the temple". Rastas who view Haile Selassie as Jesus argue that both were descendants from the royal line of the Biblical king David, while Rastas also emphasise the fact that the Makonnen dynasty, of which Haile Selassie was a member, claimed descent from the Biblical figures Solomon and the Queen of Sheba.
    ellauri108.html on line 100: Other Rastas see Selassie as embodying Jesus' teachings and essence but reject the idea that he was the literal reincarnation of Jesus. Members of the Twelve Tribes of Israel denomination, for instance, reject the idea that Selassie was the Second Coming, arguing that this event has yet to occur. From this perspective, Selassie is perceived as a messenger or emissary of God rather than a manifestation of God himself. Rastas holding to this view sometimes regard the deification of Haile Selassie as naïve or ignorant, in some cases thinking it as dangerous to worship a human being as God. There are various Rastas who went from believing that Haile Selassie was both God incarnate and the Second Coming of Jesus to seeing him as something distinct.
    ellauri108.html on line 102: On being crowned, Haile Selassie was given the title of "King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah". Rastas use this title for Haile Selassie alongside others, such as "Almighty God", "Judge and Avenger", "King Alpha and Queen Omega", "Returned Messiah", "Elect of God", and "Elect of Himself". Rastas also view Haile Selassie as a symbol of their positive affirmation of Africa as a source of spiritual and cultural heritage.
    ellauri108.html on line 104: While he was emperor, many Jamaican Rastas professed the belief that Haile Selassie would never die. The 1974 overthrow of Haile Selassie by the military Derg and his subsequent death in 1975 resulted in a crisis of faith for many practitioners. Some left the movement altogether. Others remained, and developed new strategies for dealing with the news. Some Rastas believed that Selassie did not really die and that claims to the contrary were Western misinformation. To bolster their argument, they pointed to the fact that no corpse had been produced; in reality, Haile Selassie's body had been buried beneath his palace, remaining undiscovered there until 1992. Another perspective within Rastafari acknowledged that Haile Selassie's body had perished, but claimed that his inner essence survived as a spiritual force. A third response within the Rastafari community was that Selassie's death was inconsequential as he had only been a "personification" of Jah rather than Jah himself.
    ellauri108.html on line 106: During his life, Selassie described himself as a devout Christian. In a 1967 interview, Selassie was asked about the Rasta belief that he was the Second Coming of Jesus, to which he responded: "I have heard of this idea. I also met certain Rastafarians. I told them clearly that I am a man, that I am mortal, and that I will be replaced by the oncoming generation, and that they should never make a mistake in assuming or pretending that a human being is emanated from a deity." His grandson Ermias Sahle Selassie has said that there is "no doubt that Haile Selassie did not encourage the Rastafari movement". Critics of Rastafari have used this as evidence that Rasta theological beliefs are incorrect, although some Rastas take Selassie's denials as evidence that he was indeed the incarnation of God, based on their reading of the Gospel of Luke.
    ellauri108.html on line 110: Practitioners of Rastafari identify themselves with the ancient Israelites—God's chosen people in the Old Testament—and believe that black Africans broadly or Rastas more specifically are either the descendants or the reincarnations of this ancient people. This is similar to beliefs in Judaism, although many Rastas believe that contemporary Jews' status as the descendants of the ancient Israelites is a false claim. Rastas typically believe that black Africans are God's chosen people, meaning that they made a covenant with him and thus have a special responsibility. Rastafari espouses the view that this, the true identity of black Africans, has been lost and needs to be reclaimed.
    ellauri108.html on line 112: There is no uniform Rasta view on race. Black supremacy was a theme early in the movement, with the belief in the existence of a distinctly black African race that is superior to other racial groups. While some still hold this belief, non-black Rastas are now widely accepted in the movement. Rastafari's history has opened the religion to accusations of racism. Cashmore noted that there was an "implicit potential" for racism in Rasta beliefs but he also noted that racism was not "intrinsic" to the religion. Some Rastas have acknowledged that there is racism in the movement, primarily against Europeans and Asians. Some Rasta sects reject the notion that a white European can ever be a legitimate Rasta. Other Rasta sects believe that an "African" identity is not inherently linked to black skin but rather is about whether an individual displays an African "attitude" or "spirit".
    ellauri108.html on line 117: Rastas view Babylon as being responsible for both the Atlantic slave trade which removed enslaved Africans from their continent and the ongoing poverty which plagues the African diaspora. Rastas turn to Biblical scripture to explain the Atlantic slave trade, believing that the enslavement, exile, and exploitation of black Africans was punishment for failing to live up to their status as Jah's chosen people. Many Rastas, adopting a Pan-Africanist ethos, have criticised the division of Africa into nation-states, regarding this as a Babylonian development, and are often hostile to capitalist resource extraction from the continent. Rastas seek to delegitimise and destroy Babylon, something often conveyed in the Rasta aphorism "Chant down Babylon". Rastas often expect the white-dominated society to dismiss their beliefs as false, and when this happens they see it as confirmation of the correctness of their faith.
    ellauri108.html on line 119: Rastas view "Zion" as an ideal to which they aspire. As with "Babylon", this term comes from the Bible, where it refers to an idealised Jerusalem. Rastas use "Zion" either for Ethiopia specifically or for Africa more broadly, the latter having an almost mythological identity in Rasta discourse. Many Rastas use the term "Ethiopia" as a synonym for "Africa"; thus, Rastas in Ghana for instance described themselves as already living within "Ethiopia". Other Rastas apply the term "Zion" to Jamaica or they use it to describe a state of mind.
    ellauri108.html on line 121: In portraying Africa as their "Promised Land", Rastas reflect their desire to escape what they perceive as the domination and degradation that they experience in Babylon. During the first three decades of the Rastafari movement, it placed strong emphasis on the need for the African diaspora to be repatriated to Africa. To this end, various Rastas lobbied the Jamaican government and United Nations to oversee this resettlement process. Other Rastas organised their own transportation to the African continent. Critics of the movement have argued that the migration of the entire African diaspora to Africa is implausible, particularly as no African country would welcome this.
    ellauri108.html on line 125: Rastafari is a millenarian movement, espousing the idea that the present age will come to an apocalyptic end. Many practitioners believe that on this Day of Judgement, Babylon will be overthrown, with Rastas being the chosen few who survive the upheaval. With Babylon destroyed, Rastas believe that humanity will be ushered into a "new age". This is conceived as being a millennium of peace, justice, and happiness in which the righteous shall live in Africa, now a paradise. In the 1980s, many Rastas believed that the Day of Judgment would happen around the year 2000. A view then common in the Rasta community was that the world's white people would wipe themselves out through nuclear war, with black Africans then ruling the world, something that they argued was prophesied in the Book of Daniel.
    ellauri108.html on line 127: Rastas do not believe that there is a specific afterlife to which individuals go following bodily death. They believe in the possibility of eternal life, and that only those who shun righteousness will actually die. The scholar of religion Leonard E. Barrett observed some Jamaican Rastas who believed that those practitioners who did die had not been faithful to Jah. He suggested that this attitude stemmed from the large numbers of young people that were then members of the movement, and who had thus seen only few Rastas die. Another Rasta view is that those who are righteous will undergo reincarnation, with an individual's identity remaining throughout each of their incarnations. In keeping with their views on death, Rastas eschew celebrating physical death and often avoid funerals, also repudiating the practice of ancestor veneration that is common among traditional African religions.
    ellauri108.html on line 131: Rastafari promotes the idea of "living naturally", in accordance with what Rastas regard as nature's laws. It endorses the idea that Africa is the "natural" abode of black Africans, a continent where they can live according to African culture and tradition and be themselves on a physical, emotional, and intellectual level. Practitioners believe that Westerners and Babylon have detached themselves from nature through technological development and thus have become debilitated, slothful, and decadent. Some Rastas express the view that they should adhere to what they regard as African laws rather than the laws of Babylon, thus defending their involvement in certain acts which may be illegal in the countries that they are living in. In emphasising this Afrocentric approach, Rastafari expresses overtones of black nationalism.
    ellauri108.html on line 135: Rastafari promotes what it regards as the restoration of black manhood, believing that men in the African diaspora have been emasculated by Babylon. It espouses patriarchal principles, including the idea that women should submit to male leadership. External observers—including scholars such as Cashmore and Edmonds—have claimed that Rastafari accords women an inferior position to men. Rastafari women usually accept this subordinate position and regard it as their duty to obey their men; the academic Maureen Rowe suggested that women were willing to join the religion despite its restrictions because they valued the life of structure and discipline it provided. Rasta discourse often presents women as morally weak and susceptible to deception by evil, and claims that they are impure while menstruating. Rastas legitimise these gender roles by citing Biblical passages, particularly those in the Book of Leviticus and in the writings of Paul the Apostle. The Rasta Shop is a store selling items associated with Rastafari in the U.S. state of Oregon.
    ellauri108.html on line 137: Rasta women usually wear clothing that covers their head and hides their body contours. Trousers are usually avoided, in favour of long skirts. Women are expected to cover their head while praying, and in some Rasta groups this is expected of them whenever in public. Rasta discourse insists this female dress code is necessary to prevent women attracting men and presents it as an antidote to the sexual objectification of women in Babylon. Rasta men are permitted to wear whatever they choose. Although men and women took part alongside each other in early Rasta rituals, from the late 1940s and 1950s the Rasta community increasingly encouraged gender segregation for ceremonies. This was legitimised with the explanation that women were impure through menstruation and that their presence at the ceremonies would distract male participants.
    ellauri108.html on line 139: As it existed in Jamaica, Rastafari did not promote monogamy. Rasta men are permitted multiple female sex partners, while women are expected to reserve their sexual activity for one male partner. Marriage is not usually formalised through legal ceremonies but is a common-law affair, although many Rastas are legally married. Rasta men refer to their female partners as "queens", or "empresses", while the males in these relationships are known as "kingmen". Rastafari places great importance on family life and the raising of children, with reproduction being encouraged. The religion emphasises the place of men in child-rearing, associating this with the recovery of African manhood. Women often work, sometimes while the man raises the children at home. Rastafari typically rejects feminism, although since the 1970s growing numbers of Rasta women have called for greater gender equity in the movement. The scholar Terisa E. Turner for instance encountered Kenyan feminists who were appropriating Rastafari content to suit their political agenda. Some Rasta women have challenged gender norms by wearing their hair uncovered in public and donning trousers.
    ellauri108.html on line 141: Rastafari regards procreation as the purpose of sex, and thus oral and anal sex are usually forbidden. Both contraception and abortion are usually censured, and a common claim in Rasta discourse is that these were inventions of Babylon to decrease the black African birth-rate. Rastas typically express hostile attitudes to homosexuality, regarding homosexuals as evil and unnatural; this attitude derives from references to same-sex sexual activity in the Bible. Homosexual Rastas probably conceal their sexual orientation because of these attitudes. Rastas typically see the growing acceptance of birth control and homosexuality in Western society as evidence of the degeneration of Babylon as it approaches its apocalyptic end.
    ellauri108.html on line 147: One of the central activities at groundings is "reasoning". This is a discussion among assembled Rastas about the religion's principles and their relevance to current events. These discussions are supposed to be non-combative, although attendees can point out the fallacies in any arguments presented. Those assembled inform each other about the revelations that they have received through meditation and dream. Each contributor is supposed to push the boundaries of understanding until the entire group has gained greater insight into the topic under discussion. In meeting together with like-minded individuals, reasoning helps Rastas to reassure one another of the correctness of their beliefs. Rastafari meetings are opened and closed with prayers. These involve supplication of God, the supplication for the hungry, sick, and infants, and calls for the destruction of the Rastas' enemies, and then close with statements of adoration.
    ellauri108.html on line 158: Rastas typically smoke cannabis in the form of a large, hand-rolled cigarette known as a spliff. This is often rolled together while a prayer is offered to Jah; the spliff is lit and smoked only when the prayer is completed. At other times, cannabis is smoked in a water pipe referred to as a "chalice": styles include kutchies, chillums, and steamers. The pipe is passed in a counter-clockwise direction around the assembled circle of Rastas.
    ellauri108.html on line 160: There are various options that might explain how cannabis smoking came to be part of Rastafari. By the 8th century, Arab traders had introduced cannabis to Central and Southern Africa. In the 19th century, enslaved Bakongo people arrived in Jamaica, where they established the religion of Kumina. In Kumina, cannabis was smoked during religious ceremonies in the belief that it facilitated possession by ancestral spirits. The religion was largely practiced in south-east Jamaica's Saint Thomas Parish, where a prominent early Rasta, Leonard Howell, lived while he was developing many of Rastafari's beliefs and practices; it may have been through Kumina that cannabis became part of Rastafari. A second possible source was the use of cannabis in Hindu rituals. Hindu migrants arrived in Jamaica as indentured servants from British India between 1834 and 1917, and brought cannabis with them. A Jamaican Hindu priest, Laloo, was one of Howell's spiritual advisors, and may have influenced his adoption of ganja. The adoption of cannabis may also have been influenced by the widespread medicinal and recreational use of cannabis among Afro-Jamaicans in the early 20th century. Early Rastafarians may have taken an element of Jamaican culture which they associated with their peasant past and the rejection of capitalism and sanctified it by according it Biblical correlates.
    ellauri108.html on line 168: As Rastafari developed, popular music became its chief communicative medium. During the 1960s, ska was a popular musical style in Jamaica, and although its protests against social and political conditions were mild, it gave early expression to Rasta socio-political ideology. Particularly prominent in the connection between Rastafari and ska were the musicians Count Ossie and Don Drummond. Ossie was a drummer who believed that black people needed to develop their own style of music; he was heavily influenced by Burru, an Afro-Jamaican drumming style. Ossie subsequently popularised this new Rastafari ritual music by playing at various groundings and groundations around Jamaica, with songs like "Another Moses" and "Babylon Gone" reflecting Rasta influence. Rasta themes also appeared in Drummond's work, with songs such as "Reincarnation" and "Tribute to Marcus Garvey".
    ellauri108.html on line 172: Rastas typically regard words as having an intrinsic power, seeking to avoid language that contributes to servility, self-degradation, and the objectification of the person. Practitioners therefore often use their own form of language, known commonly as "dread talk", "Iyaric", and "Rasta talk". Developed in Jamaica during the 1940s, this use of language fosters group identity and cultivates particular values. Adherents believe that by formulating their own language they are launching an ideological attack on the integrity of the English language, which they view as a tool of Babylon. The use of this language helps Rastas distinguish and separate themselves from non-Rastas, for whom—according to Barrett—Rasta rhetoric can be "meaningless babbling". However, Rasta terms have also filtered into wider Jamaican speech patterns.
    ellauri108.html on line 173: Rastas regularly use the three colours of the Ethiopian flag for their movement, although they often add black to this tricolour, symbolising the black skin of the African people
    ellauri108.html on line 175: Rastas make wide use of the pronoun "I". This denotes the Rasta view that the self is divine, and reminds each Rasta that they are not a slave and have value, worth, and dignity as a human being. For instance, Rastas use "I" in place of "me", "I and I" in place of "we", "I-ceive" in place of "receive", "I-sire" in place of "desire", "I-rate" in place of "create", and "I-men" in place of "Amen". Rastas refer to this process as "InI Consciousness" or "Isciousness". Rastas typically refer to Haile Selassie as "Haile Selassie I", thus indicating their belief in his divinity. Rastas also typically believe that the phonetics of a word should be linked to its meaning. For instance, Rastas often use the word "downpression" in place of "oppression" because oppression bears down on people rather than lifting them up, with "up" being phonetically akin to "opp-". Similarly, they often favour "livicate" over "dedicate" because "ded-" is phonetically akin to the word "dead". In the early decades of the religion's development, Rastas often said "Peace and Love" as a greeting, although the use of this declined as Rastafari matured.
    ellauri108.html on line 177: Rastas often make use of the colours red, black, green, and gold. Red, gold, and green were used in the Ethiopian flag, while, prior to the development of Rastafari, the Jamaican black nationalist activist Marcus Garvey had used red, green, and black as the colours for the Pan-African flag representing his United Negro Improvement Association. According to Garvey, the red symbolised the blood of martyrs, the black symbolised the skin of Africans, and the green represented the vegetation of the land, an interpretation endorsed by some Rastas. The colour gold is often included alongside Garvey's three colours; it has been adopted from the Jamaican flag, and is often interpreted as symbolising the minerals and raw materials which constitute Africa's wealth. Rastas often paint these colours onto their buildings, vehicles, kiosks, and other items, or display them on their clothing, helping to distinguish Rastas from non-Rastas and allowing adherents to recognise their co-religionists. As well as being used by Rastas, the colour set has also been adopted by Pan-Africanists more broadly, who use it to display their identification with Afrocentricity; for this reason it was adopted on the flags of many post-independence African states. Rastas often accompany the use of these three or four colours with the image of the Lion of Judah, also adopted from the Ethiopian flag and symbolizing Haile Selassie.
    ellauri108.html on line 182: Rastas seek to produce food "naturally", eating what they call ital, or "natural" food. This is often grown organically, and locally. Most Rastas adhere to the dietary laws outlined in the Book of Leviticus, and thus avoid eating pork or crustaceans. Other Rastas remain vegetarian, or vegan, a practice stemming from their interpretation of Leviticus. Many also avoid the addition of additives, including sugar and salt, to their food. Rasta dietary practices have been ridiculed by non-Rastas; in Ghana for example, where food traditionally includes a high meat content, the Rastas' emphasis on vegetable produce has led to the joke that they "eat like sheep and goats". In Jamaica, Rasta practitioners have commercialised ital food, for instance by selling fruit juices prepared according to Rasta custom.
    ellauri108.html on line 187: Rastas use their physical appearance as a means of visually demarcating themselves from non-Rastas like the whites. Male practitioners will often grow long beards, and many Rastas prefer to wear African styles of clothing, such as dashikis, rather than styles that originated in Western countries. However, it is the formation of hair into dreadlocks that is one of the most recognisable Rasta symbols. Rastas believe that dreadlocks are promoted in the Bible, specifically in the Book of Numbers, and regard them as a symbol of strength linked to the hair of the Biblical figure of Samson. They argue that their dreadlocks mark a covenant that they have made with Jah, and reflect their commitment to the idea of 'naturalness'. They also perceive the wearing of dreads as a symbolic rejection of Babylon and a refusal to conform to its norms regarding grooming aesthetics. Rastas are often critical of black people who straighten their hair, believing that it is an attempt to imitate white European hair and thus reflects alienation from a person's African identity. Sometimes this dreadlocked hair is then shaped and styled, often inspired by a lion's mane symbolising Haile Selassie, who is regarded as "the Conquering Lion of Judah".
    ellauri108.html on line 191: From the beginning of the Rastafari movement in the 1930s, adherents typically grew beards and tall hair, perhaps in imitation of Haile Selassie. The wearing of hair as dreadlocks then emerged as a Rasta practice in the 1940s; there were debates within the movement as to whether dreadlocks should be worn or not, with proponents of the style becoming dominant. There are various claims as to how this practice was adopted. One claim is that it was adopted in imitation of certain African nations, such as the Maasai, Somalis, or Oromo, or that it was inspired by the hairstyles worn by some of those involved in the anti-colonialist Mau Mau Uprising in Kenya. An alternative explanation is that it was inspired by the hairstyles of the Hindu sadhus.
    ellauri108.html on line 199: Further contributing significantly to Rastafari's development were Ethiopianism and the Back to Africa ethos, both traditions with 18th-century roots. In the 19th century, there were growing calls for the African diaspora located in Western Europe and the Americas to be resettled in Africa, with some of this diaspora establishing colonies in Sierra Leone and Liberia. Based in Liberia, the black Christian preacher Edward Wilmot Blyden began promoting African pride and the preservation of African tradition, customs, and institutions. Also spreading throughout Africa was Ethiopianism, a movement that accorded special status to the east African nation of Ethiopia because it was mentioned in various Biblical passages. For adherents of Ethiopianism, "Ethiopia" was regarded as a synonym of Africa as a whole.
    ellauri108.html on line 201: Marcus Garvey, a prominent black nationalist theorist who heavily influenced Rastafari and is regarded as a prophet by many Rastas. The Jamaican activist Marcus Garvey, spent much of his adult life in the US and Britain. Garvey supported the idea of global racial separatism and called for part of the African diaspora to relocate to Africa. His ideas faced opposition from civil rights activists like W. E. B. Du Bois who supported racial integration, and as a mass movement, Garveyism declined in the Great Depression of the 1930s. A rumour later spread that in 1916, Garvey had called on his supporters to "look to Africa" for the crowning of a black king; this quote was never verified. However, in August 1930, Garvey's play, Coronation of an African King, was performed in Kingston. Its plot revolved around the crowning of the fictional Prince Cudjoe of Sudan, although it anticipated the crowning of Haile Selassie later that year. Rastas hold Garvey in great esteem, with many regarding him as a prophet. Garvey knew of Rastafari, but took a largely negative view of the religion; he also became a critic of Haile Selassie, calling him "a great coward" who rules a "country where black men are chained and flogged".
    ellauri108.html on line 203: Haile Selassie was crowned Emperor of Ethiopia in 1930. A number of Jamaica's Christian clergymen claimed that Selassie's coronation was evidence that he was the black messiah that they believed was prophesied in the Book of Revelation, the Book of Daniel, and Psalms. Over the following years, several street preachers—most notably Leonard Howell, Archibald Dunkley, Robert Hinds, and Joseph Hibbert—began claiming that Haile Selassie was the returned Jesus. They first did so in Kingston, and soon the message spread throughout 1930s Jamaica, especially among poor communities who were hit particularly hard by the Great Depression. Clarke stated that "to all intents and purposes this was the beginning" of the Rastafari movement.
    ellauri108.html on line 205: Howell has been described as the "leading figure" in the early Rastafari movement. He preached that black Africans were superior to white Europeans and that Afro-Jamaicans should owe their allegiance to Haile Selassie rather than to George V, King of Great Britain and Ireland. The island's British authorities arrested him and charged him with sedition in 1934, resulting in his two-year imprisonment. Following his release, Howell established the Ethiopian Salvation Society and in 1939 established a Rasta community, known as Pinnacle, in Saint Catherine Parish. Police feared that Howell was training his followers for an armed rebellion and were angered that it was producing cannabis for sale. They raided the community on several occasions and Howell was imprisoned for a further two years. Upon his release he returned to Pinnacle, but the police continued with their raids and shut down the community in 1954; Howell himself was committed to a mental hospital.
    ellauri108.html on line 207: In 1936, Italy invaded and occupied Ethiopia, and Haile Selassie went into exile. The invasion brought international condemnation and led to growing sympathy for the Ethiopian cause. In 1937, Selassie created the Ethiopian World Federation, which established a branch in Jamaica later that decade. In 1941, the British drove the Italians out of Ethiopia and Selassie returned to reclaim his throne. Many Rastas interpreted this as the fulfilment of a prophecy made in the Book of Revelation.
    ellauri108.html on line 216: In the 1940s and 1950s, a more militant brand of Rastafari emerged. The vanguard of this was the House of Youth Black Faith, a group whose members were largely based in West Kingston. Backlash against the Rastas grew after a practitioner of the religion allegedly killed a woman in 1957. In March 1958, the first Rastafarian Universal Convention was held in the settlement of Back-o-Wall, Kingston. Following the event, militant Rastas unsuccessfully tried to capture the city in the name of Haile Selassie. Later that year they tried again in Spanish Town. The increasing militancy of some Rastas resulted in growing alarm about the religion in Jamaica. According to Cashmore, the Rastas became "folk devils" in Jamaican society. In 1959, the self-declared prophet and founder of the African Reform Church, Claudius Henry, sold thousands of tickets to Afro-Jamaicans, including many Rastas, for passage on a ship that he claimed would take them to Africa. The ship never arrived and Henry was charged with fraud. In 1960 he was sentenced to six years imprisonment for conspiring to overthrow the government. Henry's son was accused of being part of a paramilitary cell and executed, confirming public fears about Rasta violence. One of the most prominent clashes between Rastas and law enforcement was the Coral Gardens incident of 1963, in which an initial skirmish between police and Rastas resulted in several deaths and led to a larger roundup of practitioners. Clamping down on the Rasta movement, in 1964 the island's government implemented tougher laws surrounding cannabis use.
    ellauri108.html on line 220: Whereas its membership had previously derived predominantly from poorer sectors of society, in the 1960s Rastafari began attracting support from more privileged groups like students and professional musicians. The foremost group emphasising this approach was the Twelve Tribes of Israel, whose members came to be known as "Uptown Rastas". Among those attracted to Rastafari in this decade were middle-class intellectuals like Leahcim Semaj, who called for the religious community to place greater emphasis on scholarly social theory as a method of achieving change. Although some Jamaican Rastas were critical of him, many came under the influence of the Guyanese black nationalist academic Walter Rodney, who lectured to their community in 1968 before publishing his thoughts as the pamphlet Groundings. Like Rodney, many Jamaican Rastas were influenced by the U.S.-based Black Power movement. After Black Power declined following the deaths of prominent exponents such as Malcolm X, Michael X, and George Jackson, Rastafari filled the vacuum it left for many black youth.
    ellauri108.html on line 222: In the mid-1970s, reggae's international popularity exploded. The most successful reggae artist was Bob Marley, who—according to Cashmore—"more than any other individual, was responsible for introducing Rastafarian themes, concepts and demands to a truly universal audience". Reggae's popularity led to a growth in "pseudo-Rastafarians", individuals who listened to reggae and wore Rasta clothing but did not share its belief system. Many Rastas were angered by this, believing it commercialised their religion.
    ellauri108.html on line 227: Through reggae, Rasta musicians became increasingly important in Jamaica's political life during the 1970s. To bolster his popularity with the electorate, Jamaican Prime Minister Michael Manley employed Rasta imagery and courted and obtained support from Marley and other reggae musicians. Manley described Rastas as a "beautiful and remarkable people" and carried a cane, the "rod of correction", which he claimed was a gift from Haile Selassie. Following Manley's example, Jamaican political parties increasingly employed Rasta language, symbols, and reggae references in their campaigns, while Rasta symbols became increasingly mainstream in Jamaican society. This helped to confer greater legitimacy on Rastafari, with reggae and Rasta imagery being increasingly presented as a core part of Jamaica's cultural heritage for the growing tourist industry. In the 1980s, a Rasta, Barbara Makeda Blake Hannah, became a senator in the Jamaican Parliament.
    ellauri108.html on line 229: Enthusiasm for Rastafari was dampened by the unexpected death of Haile Selassie in 1975 and that of Marley in 1981. During the 1980s, the number of Rastas in Jamaica declined, with Pentecostal and other Charismatic Christian groups proving more successful at attracting young recruits. Several publicly prominent Rastas converted to Christianity, and two of those who did so—Judy Mowatt and Tommy Cowan—maintained that Marley had converted from Rastafari to Christianity, in the form of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, during his final days. The significance of Rastafari messages in reggae also declined with the growing popularity of dancehall, a Jamaican musical genre that typically foregrounded lyrical themes of hyper-masculinity, violence, and sexual activity rather than religious symbolism.
    ellauri108.html on line 233: Rastafari is not a homogeneous movement and has no single administrative structure, nor any single leader. A majority of Rastas avoid centralised and hierarchical structures because they do not want to replicate the structures of Babylon and because their religion's ultra-individualistic ethos places emphasis on inner divinity. The structure of most Rastafari groups is less like that of Christian denominations and is instead akin to the cellular structure of other African diasporic traditions like Haitian Vodou, Cuban Santería, and Jamaica's Revival Zion. Since the 1970s, there have been attempts to unify all Rastas, namely through the establishment of the Rastafari Movement Association, which sought political mobilisation. In 1982, the first international assembly of Rastafari groups took place in Toronto, Canada. This and subsequent international conferences, assemblies, and workshops have helped to cement global networks and cultivate an international community of Rastas.
    ellauri108.html on line 239: The Bobo Ashanti sect was founded in Jamaica by Emanuel Charles Edwards through the establishment of his Ethiopia Africa Black International Congress (EABIC) in 1958. The group established a commune in Bull Bay, where they were led by Edwards until his 1994 death. The group hold to a highly rigid ethos. Edwards advocated the idea of a new trinity, with Haile Selassie as the living God, himself as the Christ, and Garvey as the prophet. Male members are divided into two categories: the "priests" who conduct religious services and the "prophets" who take part in reasoning sessions. It places greater restrictions on women than most other forms of Rastafari; women are regarded as impure because of menstruation and childbirth and so are not permitted to cook for men. The group teaches that black Africans are God's chosen people and are superior to white Europeans, with members often refusing to associate with white people. Bobo Ashanti Rastas are recognisable by their long, flowing robes and turbans.
    ellauri108.html on line 242: The Twelve Tribes of Israel were founded in 1968 in Kingston by Vernon Carrington. He proclaimed himself the reincarnation of the Old Testament prophet Gad and his followers call him "Prophet Gad", "Brother Gad", or "Gadman". It is commonly regarded as the most liberal form of Rastafari and the closest to Christianity. Practitioners are often dubbed "Christian Rastas" because they believe Jesus is the only saviour; Haile Selassie is accorded importance, but is not viewed as the second coming of Jesus. The group divides its members into twelve groups according to which Hebrew calendar month they were born in; each month is associated with a particular colour, body part, and mental function. Maintaining dreadlocks and an ital diet are considered commendable but not essential, while adherents are called upon to read a chapter of the Bible each day. Membership is open to individuals of any racial background.
    ellauri108.html on line 246: The Church of Haile Selassie, Inc., was founded by Abuna Foxe and operated much like a mainstream Christian church, with a hierarchy of functionaries, weekly services, and Sunday schools. In adopting this broad approach, the Church seeks to develop Rastafari's respectability in wider society. Fulfilled Rastafari is a multi-ethnic movement that has spread in popularity during the 21st century, in large part through the Internet. The Fulfilled Rastafari group accept Haile Selassie's statements that he was a man and that he was a devout Christian, and so place emphasis on worshipping Jesus through the example set forth by Haile Selassie. The wearing of dreadlocks and the adherence to an ital diet are considered issues up to the individual.
    ellauri108.html on line 250: As of 2012, there were an estimated 700,000 to 1,000,000 Rastas worldwide. They can be found in many different regions, including most of the world's major population centres. Rastafari's influence on wider society has been more substantial than its numerical size, particularly in fostering a racial, political, and cultural consciousness among the African diaspora and Africans themselves. Men dominate Rastafari. In its early years, most of its followers were men, and the women who did adhere to it tended to remain in the background. This picture of Rastafari's demographics has been confirmed by ethnographic studies conducted in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
    ellauri108.html on line 254: Rastafari is a non-missionary religion. However, elders from Jamaica often go "trodding" to instruct new converts in the fundamentals of the religion. On researching English Rastas during the 1970s, Cashmore noted that they had not converted instantaneously, but rather had undergone "a process of drift" through which they gradually adopted Rasta beliefs and practices, resulting in their ultimate acceptance of Haile Selassie's central importance. Based on his research in West Africa, Neil J. Savishinsky found that many of those who converted to Rastafari came to the religion through their pre-existing use of marijuana as a recreational drug.
    ellauri108.html on line 256: Rastas often claim that—rather than converting to the religion—they were actually always a Rasta and that their embrace of its beliefs was merely the realisation of this. There is no formal ritual carried out to mark an individual's entry into the Rastafari movement, although once they do join an individual often changes their name, with many including the prefix "Ras". Rastas regard themselves as an exclusive and elite community, membership of which is restricted to those who have the "insight" to recognise Haile Selassie's importance. Practitioners thus often regard themselves as the "enlightened ones" who have "seen the light". Many of them see no point in establishing good relations with non-Rastas, believing that the latter will never accept Rastafari doctrine as truth.
    ellauri108.html on line 262: Barrett described Rastafari as "the largest, most identifiable, indigenous movement in Jamaica." In the mid-1980s, there were approximately 70,000 members and sympathisers of Rastafari in Jamaica. The majority were male, working-class, former Christians aged between 18 and 40. In the 2011 Jamaican census, 29,026 individuals identified as Rastas. Jamaica's Rastas were initially entirely from the Afro-Jamaican majority, and although Afro-Jamaicans are still the majority, Rastafari has also gained members from the island's Chinese, Indian, Afro-Chinese, Afro-Jewish, mulatto, and white minorities. Until 1965 the vast majority were from the lower classes, although it has since attracted many middle-class members; by the 1980s there were Jamaican Rastas working as lawyers and university professors. Jamaica is often valorised by Rastas as the fountain-head of their faith, and many Rastas living elsewhere travel to the island on pilgrimage.
    ellauri108.html on line 304: In the wake of the murder of George Floyd, she had sought to connect historical Jewish persecution to Floyd’s death and other flashpoints of special significance to African Americans.
    ellauri108.html on line 305: Wayne Gould and his wife were simply asking that Moyo refrain from making political statements on behalf of the museum.
    ellauri108.html on line 315: “Has it occurred to you and the rest of the JHM board that I am a human being and I cannot work 24/7 even if I could be adequately compensated for giving all my waking hours to JHM business?” she wrote to Kirshner, the museum’s president, on April 22. “I never thought I would have to say this at work, but it seems necessary to say this to you: Slavery was officially abolished in the USA quite some time ago.”
    ellauri108.html on line 369: Jemeninjuutalainen rusehtava Shoshana suoristi mustan kikkaran tukkansa mennessään esittäytymään Hannun vanhemmille Ritvalle ja Paavolle. Opettajapariskunta tuijotti sitä mesmeröityneenä ja suhauttelivat sen nimen äshiä keittiössä kuin vihaiselle koiralle: Sh sh. Olis Hannun kannattanut kuzua sitä vaan suomalaisittain Susannaxi, niin eivät olis ainakaan ässhät shuhissheet. Suomalaiset Susannat on pääsääntöisesti platinum blondeja, toki poikkeuxiakin on, esim. Susanna Ruokamo.
    ellauri108.html on line 375: In school, when we were taught of the slave trade, we did mot hear of the glory of the kings and the Kebra Nagast. We heard about "his story." We did not hear of African glory black my story, the truth as revealed in the Kebra Nagast We came to realize that even the Bible is just a version of
    ellauri108.html on line 379: Solomons hubris, his tragic flaw, is the meat and bone of the Ethiopian bible, the Kebra Nagast, which, translated, is the glory of the kings. In this work, unlike the King James' bible, we see King Solomon struggling with his own mortality. Bayna-Lehkem, or David, as he is called by Solomon because of likeness to the boy's grandfather, King David, is a man of virtue who will extend his glory to Ethiopia. So, Solomon's weakness for women, which brings about his dissolution, gives him the thing he is truly seeking: a son to walk his own footsteps, like Shakespeare's Hamnet, a son wiser, by dint of his virtue, than himself. A son wiser than himself, that sounds rather like a stone too big to both create and throw. Solomon is disinherited by the lord when he marries the daughter of the Pharaoh and worships her golden insect idols. A hairy spider on its back. For this he is punished severely. We discern his absolute nihilism. His ultimate disillusionment. Knowledge is nothing but sorrow. He that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. In the bitter nutmeat of the Ecclesiastes. Who was the mother? Of course, Queen Sheba. She was, by all reports, black.
    ellauri108.html on line 381: I know Jah will provide, Benjy says with certainty. When that truth came I had no money, no job, no food. The child, my child, is crying and crying, my wife can't shut him up. As a matter of fact, she schedaadled. Just vamoosed. I am so vexed I can't pray no more. So I open the door and look to the sea. There I see a boat with three fishermen in it. The men are fishing but there is no space in the boat for another person. Out there on the sea, the waves are tall. Behind that boat, I see someone swimming. A little boy swimming along after the boat. I am wondering why the fishermen don't stop to pick up the boy in such a rough sea. But then I come to an understandingand it is Jah who put this idea into my head. That little boy's job is to dive for the fish traps, bring them up from the bottom. He is diving in that rough, rough sea for fish traps, and raising them up, all heavy with saltwater, all by himself. Just a little boy, too. Maybe ten years old. But so strong. Sometimes the sea cover him. I wouldn't see him or the boat. Then they would bounce him back into the sea.
    ellauri108.html on line 383: Benjy pauses for a reefer. "Do you see what I am saying? If such a boy could live on the sea, I knew that my son could live on the land. I come up here on this hill, that very morning. And I start to make a living making charcoal out of pimento trees. Right here, where we sit. This is where I get my start, right here on these cold, old embers.
    ellauri108.html on line 412: King Nebuchadnezzar had a huge golden image built as a symbol of his power and glory. He then commanded that his people bow down and worship this image whenever they heard the sound of his musical herald. Those who disobeyed the order would be thrown into an immense, blazing furnace.
    ellauri108.html on line 416: "O Nebuchadnezzar, we have no need to answer you in this matter. If this be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of your hand, O king. But if not, be it known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods or worship the golden image that you have set up." (Daniel 3:16-18, ESV)
    ellauri108.html on line 424: Needless to say, this made quite an impression on Nebuchadnezzar who declared:
    ellauri108.html on line 426: "Blessed be the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who has sent his angel and delivered his servants, who trusted in him, and set aside the king's command, and yielded up their bodies rather than serve and worship any god except their own God." (Daniel 3:28, ESV)
    ellauri108.html on line 432: Who was the fourth man Nebuchadnezzar saw in the flames? Was it Daniel? Naah, he was out of it. Bible scholars believe he was either an angel or a manifestation of Christ. Regardless, his appearance was miraculous, a heavenly bodyguard sent by God to protect Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego during their intense time of need.
    ellauri108.html on line 436: Today's Christians might not be threatened by fiery death, but many are tested nonetheless. Those facing tough times might look to this story for inspiration, knowing that it is possible to stand firm in their faith even if God does not come to their rescue.
    ellauri108.html on line 445: There are no angels, Benjy explains. just man. What about Jah, I ask. That's what's meant by I and I, he replies. Me and myself, us two together, in this flesh, at this moment. I'm the only angel I'll ever need. I sit at my right and left ears in mini size as superego and id, and whisper to myself.
    ellauri108.html on line 453: Because of what they regard as the corruption of the Bible, Rastas also turn to other sources that they believe shed light on black African history. Common texts used for this purpose include Leonard Howell's 1935 work The Promised Key, Robert Athlyi Rogers' 1924 book Holy Piby, and Fitz Balintine Pettersburg's 1920s work, the Royal Parchment Scroll of Black Supremacy. Many Rastas also treat the Kebra Nagast, a 14th-century Ethiopian text, as a source through which to interpret the Bible.
    ellauri108.html on line 459: Members of the Twelve Tribes of Israel denomination, for instance, reject the idea that Selassie was the Second Coming, arguing that this event has yet to occur.
    ellauri108.html on line 463: Practitioners of Rastafari identify themselves with the ancient Israelites—God's chosen people in the Old Testament—and believe that black Africans broadly or Rastas more specifically are either the descendants or the reincarnations of this ancient people.[102] This is similar to beliefs in Judaism,[103] although many Rastas believe that contemporary Jews' status as the descendants of the ancient Israelites is a false claim.[104] Rastas typically believe that black Africans are God's chosen people, meaning that they made a covenant with him and thus have a special responsibility. Rastafari espouses the view that this, the true identity of black Africans, has been lost and needs to be reclaimed. Some Rasta sects reject the notion that a white European can ever be a legitimate Rasta.
    ellauri108.html on line 477: Rastas view "Zion" as an ideal to which they aspire. As with "Babylon", this term comes from the Bible, where it refers to an idealised Jerusalem. Rastas use "Zion" either for Ethiopia specifically or for Africa more broadly, the latter having an almost mythological identity in Rasta discourse. Many Rastas use the term "Ethiopia" as a synonym for "Africa"; thus, Rastas in Ghana for instance described themselves as already living within "Ethiopia". Other Rastas apply the term "Zion" to Jamaica or they use it to describe a state of mind.
    ellauri108.html on line 479: During the first three decades of the Rastafari movement, it placed strong emphasis on the need for the African diaspora to be repatriated to Africa. To this end, various Rastas lobbied the Jamaican government and United Nations to oversee this resettlement process. Other Rastas organised their own transportation to the African continent. Critics of the movement have argued that the migration of the entire African diaspora to Africa is implausible, particularly as no African country would welcome this.
    ellauri108.html on line 485: Rastafari is a millenarian movement, espousing the idea that the present age will come to an apocalyptic end. Many practitioners believe that on this Day of Judgement, Babylon will be overthrown, with Rastas being the chosen few who survive the upheaval. With Babylon destroyed, Rastas believe that humanity will be ushered into a "new age". This is conceived as being a millennium of peace, justice, and happiness in which the righteous shall live in Africa, now a paradise.
    ellauri108.html on line 489: Rastas do not believe that there is a specific afterlife to which individuals go following bodily death. They believe in the possibility of eternal life, and that only those who shun righteousness will actually die. The scholar of religion Leonard E. Barrett observed some Jamaican Rastas who believed that those practitioners who did die had not been faithful to Jah. He suggested that this attitude stemmed from the large numbers of young people that were then members of the movement, and who had thus seen only few Rastas die. Another Rasta view is that those who are righteous will undergo reincarnation, with an individual's identity remaining throughout each of their incarnations. In keeping with their views on death, Rastas eschew celebrating physical death and often avoid funerals, also repudiating the practice of ancestor veneration that is common among traditional African religions.
    ellauri109.html on line 227: Louis Aragon (3. lokakuuta 1897 Pariisi – 24. joulukuuta 1982 Pariisi) oli ranskalainen historioitsija, runoilija ja kirjailija.
    ellauri109.html on line 236: Ruth kuulostaa hyvältä ihmiseltä. Oliko se jutku? Jep. Franz Boas was Jewish, besides his two best known students, Ruth Benedict and Margaret Mead were also Jewish.
    ellauri109.html on line 268: John Rogers Searle (/sɜːrl/; born July 31, 1932) is an American philosopher. He was Willis S. and Marion Slusser Professor Emeritus of the Philosophy of Mind and Language and Professor of the Graduate School at the University of California, Berkeley until June 2019, when his emeritus status was revoked for having violated the university’s sexual harassment policies. Widely noted for his contributions to the philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, and social philosophy, he began teaching at UC Berkeley in 1959.
    ellauri109.html on line 270: In 2000 Searle received the Jean Nicod Prize; in 2004, the National Humanities Medal; and in 2006, the Mind & Brain Prize. He was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 2010. Searle's early work on speech acts, influenced by J. L. Austin and Ludwig Wittgenstein, helped establish his reputation. His notable concepts include the "Chinese room" argument against "strong" artificial intelligence.
    ellauri109.html on line 276: In March 2017, Searle became the subject of sexual assault allegations. The Los Angeles Times reported: "A new lawsuit alleges that university officials failed to properly respond to complaints that John Searle, an 84-year-old renowned philosophy professor, sexually assaulted his 24-year-old research associate last July and cut her pay when she rejected his advances." The case brought to light several earlier complaints against Searle, on which Berkeley allegedly had failed to act.
    ellauri109.html on line 278: The lawsuit, filed in a California court on March 21, 2017, sought damages both from Searle and from the Regents of the University of California as his employers. It also claims that Jennifer Hudin, the director of the John Searle Center for Social Ontology, where the complainant had been employed as an assistant to Searle, has stated that Searle "has had sexual relationships with his students and others in the past in exchange for academic, monetary or other benefits". After news of the lawsuit became public, several previous allegations of sexual harassment by Searle were also revealed.
    ellauri109.html on line 280: On June 19, 2019, following campus disciplinary proceedings by Berkeley's Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination (OPHD), University of California President Janet Napolitano approved a recommendation that Searle have his emeritus status revoked, after a determination that he violated university policies against sexual harassment.
    ellauri109.html on line 319:
    The historical Kohlhase

    ellauri109.html on line 321: The merchant Hans Kohlhase lived in Cölln on the Spree (now incorporated into Berlin) in the Margraviate of Brandenburg in the 16th century. In October 1532 he set out on a trip to the Leipzig Trade Fair in the neighboring Electorate of Saxony. On the way two of his horses were seized, at the command of the Junker von Zaschwitz, as a supposed fee for passage through Saxony. Kohlhase sought redress in the Saxon courts but failed to obtain it. Outraged, he issued a public challenge in 1534 and burned down houses in Wittenberg. Even a letter of admonition from Martin Luther could not dissuade him, and Kohlhase and the band he collected committed further acts of terror. In 1540 he was finally captured and tried, and was publicly broken on the wheel in Berlin on 22 March 1540. From this history Kleist fashioned a novella that dramatized a personal quest for justice in defiance of the claims of the general law and the community.
    ellauri109.html on line 325: As Kohlhaas is led to execution, he sees in the crowd the disguised Elector of Saxony. Through his lawyer, he is informed that his suit against the Junker has been successful, and is presented with compensation for the injuries of his hired man and shown the horses, now well-fed and healthy. Pleased that justice has been served, he submits willingly to the execution.
    ellauri109.html on line 327: Later it turns out that Kohlhaas has on his person papers that contain important information about the House of Saxony.
    ellauri109.html on line 328: However, shortly before being beheaded, he opens the amulet on his neck containing the papers regarding the House of Saxony and swallows them. The Elector of Saxony is so distressed by this act that he faints, and Kohlhaas is beheaded shortly, feeling two foot sho-o-o-rt.
    ellauri109.html on line 332: In the spring of 1799, the 21-year-old Kleist wrote a letter to his half-sister Ulrike [de] in which he found it "incomprehensible how a human being can live without a life plan" (Lebensplan). In effect, Kleist sought and discovered an overwhelming sense of security by looking to the future with a definitive plan for his life. It brought him happiness and assured him of confidence, especially knowing life without a plan only saw despair and discomfort. The irony of his suicide is the fodder of his critics.
    ellauri109.html on line 383: Flaubert's dozens of long letters to her, in 1846–1847, then especially between 1851 and 1855, are one of the many joys of his correspondence. Many of them are a precious source of information on the progress of the writing of Madame Bovary. In many others, Flaubert gives lengthy appreciations and critical comments on the poems that Louise Colet sent to him for his judgment before offering them for publication. The most interesting of these comments show the vast differences between her and him on the matter of style and literary expression, she being a gushing Romanticist, he deeply convinced that the writer must abstain from gush and self-indulgence.
    ellauri109.html on line 389: Bien que jouissant d'une célébrité personnelle et d'un succès littéraire certains à son époque, l’œuvre de Louise Colet a connu un certain déclin au cours du XXe siècle, absente de la plupart des manuels d'histoire littéraire. Sa rupture difficile avec Gustave Flaubert à partir de 1856 pourrait y être pour quelque chose, celui-ci ayant dès lors dénigré fermement l’œuvre de son ancienne maîtresse, que d'autres comme Victor Hugo acclamaient.
    ellauri109.html on line 441: Une première rupture avec Louise Colet en apporte la preuve. Dans sa lettre datée du dimanche 7 mars 1847, Flaubert ose enfin clamer à quel point il est allergique32 aux valeurs qu’elle véhicule, valeurs qui baignent et macèrent dans le discours ambiant du romantisme humanitaire33 : « tes idées de moralité, de patrie, de dévouement, tes goûts en littérature, tout cela était antipathique à mes idées, à mes goûts. »34 Ce qui vient immédiatement après est l’affirmation d’une esthétique, sur le mode de l’antithèse : « amoureux exclusif de la ligne pure, du galbe saillant, de la couleur criante, de la note sonore, je retrouvais toujours chez toi je ne sais quel ton noyé de sentiment qui atténuait tout, et altérait jusqu'à ton esprit ». Voilà les griefs d’un amant qui ne sépare pas l’art de la vie. Le lexique sentimental se trouve accaparé par le commentaire stylistique : « amoureux exclusif », écrit Flaubert, non pas d’une femme, comme Louise, elle, le voudrait, mais du tracé ferme, il lui reproche son « ton noyé de sentiment » qu’il interprète comme une déperdition de force et de précision. De même, les muscles relâchés, les lignes floues et les déliaisons trahissent le corps du texte féminin.
    ellauri109.html on line 461: Il me déplaît pour avoir mis en axiomes et pratique « la Poésie du cœur » (double farce à l'usage des impuissants et des charlatans). En voilà un qui a été peu critique ! Il me paraît avoir eu sur l'humanité le coup d'œil d'un coiffeur sentimental ! Toujours « mon pauvre cœur », toujours les larmes ! — je crois du reste que la mère Colet l'a reproduit assez fidèlement ? et il est facile maintenant de le bien connaître. As-tu remarqué ses affectations de noblesse ? Ses éternels bals aux ambassades ? Comme c'est beau cet homme qui porte sa douleur dans le monde ! — telle qu'un bijou rare, pour l'ébahissement de ces Messieurs et ces Dames !
    ellauri109.html on line 466: To be sure in this one matter we Differ much, but in everything else we’re like twins
    ellauri109.html on line 476: Two pigeons (or doves in Elizur Wright's American translation) live together in the closest friendship and 'cherish for each other/The love that brother hath for brother.' One of them yearns for a change of scene and eventually flies off on what he promises will be only a three-day adventure. During this time he is caught in a storm with little shelter, ensnared, attacked by predators and then injured by a boy with a sling, returning with relief to roam no more.
    ellauri109.html on line 507: From the start, critics complained about the ostensible sameness of Roth’s books, their narcissism and narrowness—or, as he himself put it, comparing his own work to his father’s conversation, “Family, family, family, Newark, Newark, Newark, Jew, Jew, Jew.” Roth turned self-obsession into art. He was a consummate bullshit artist.
    ellauri109.html on line 509: Over time, he took on vast themes—love, lust, loneliness, marriage, masculinity, ambition, community, solitude, loyalty, betrayal, patriotism, rebellion, piety, disgrace, the body, the imagination, American history, mortality, the relentless mistakes of life—and he did so in a variety of forms: comedy, parody, romance, conventional narrative, postmodernism, autofiction.
    ellauri109.html on line 511: Many literary figures have dreaded the spectre of the biographer. Charles Dickens, Wilkie Collins, Walt Whitman, Henry James, and Sylvia Plath are but a few who put their letters and journals into the fire. Lea poltti päiväkirjansa kommunistien pelossa ja repi lottapuvun matonkuteixi. James admitted to his nephew and literary executor that his singular desire in old age was to “frustrate as utterly as possible the postmortem exploiter.”
    ellauri109.html on line 515: A fiction writer’s life is his treasure, his ore, his savings account, his jungle gym,” Updike wrote. “As long as I am alive, I don’t want somebody else playing on my jungle gym—disturbing my children, quizzing my ex-wife, bugging my present wife, seeking for Judases among my friends, rummaging through yellowing old clippings, quoting in extenso bad reviews I would rather forget, and getting everything slightly wrong.”
    ellauri109.html on line 517: When Updike, in the eighties, felt the sour breath of potential biographers on his neck, he tried to preëmpt his pursuers by writing a series of autobiographical essays about such topics as the Pennsylvania town where he grew up, his stutter, and his skin condition. The resulting collection, “Self-Consciousness,” is a dazzlingly intimate book, but his imagination and industry did more to draw biographical attention than to repel it. In the weeks before his death, of lung cancer, in early 2009, he continued to write, including an admiring review of Blake Bailey’s biography of John Cheever. And five years later there it was: “Updike,” a biography by Adam Begley.
    ellauri109.html on line 519: In Roth’s “Exit Ghost” (2007), the last of the Zuckerman books, half a century has elapsed since the visit with Lonoff. Zuckerman, suffering from prostate cancer, has been sapped of his physical and creative vitality. Yet his greatest anxiety does not concern his impotence and incontinence, or his deteriorating short-term memory. He fears, above all, the tyranny of the biographer.
    ellauri109.html on line 523: Zuckerman considers the biographer a ruthless seducer, out to cut the artist down to comprehensible and assailable size—to displace the fiction with the real story. And this Zuckerman cannot bear. He was unnervingly present, a condor on a branch, unblinking, alive to everything.
    ellauri109.html on line 525: He was often undone—by depression, by his two marriages, by the loneliness and intensity of his commitment to the work. He could be tender and manipulative, generous and insistently selfish. But never nice.
    ellauri109.html on line 531: Roth was not an academic prodigy; his teachers sensed his intelligence but they were not overawed by his classroom performance.
    ellauri109.html on line 535: In the army he ruined his back lugging a kettle of potatoes. Niklas Roth oli sotapoliisi ja Mikko kokki.
    ellauri109.html on line 537: In Chicago, Roth met Margaret (Maggie) Martinson, a divorcée with two children who came from a small Midwestern town and whose tumultuous life (an alcoholic father, a brute of an ex-husband) fascinated him with its “goyish chaos” and provided material for his fiction.
    ellauri109.html on line 539: Roth mined his life for his characters from the beginning. He also found himself liberated, as the fifties wore on, by the example of two older Jewish-American writers. Saul Bellow’s “The Adventures of Augie March” helped “close the gap between Thomas Mann and Damon Runyon,” Roth recalled. Bernard Malamud’s “The Assistant” showed him that “you can write about the Jewish poor, you can write about the Jewish inarticulate, you can describe things near at hand.”
    ellauri109.html on line 541: In March, 1959, The New Yorker published Roth’s story “Defender of the Faith,” in which a Jewish enlisted man tries to manipulate a Jewish sergeant into giving him special treatment out of ethnic kinship. Various rabbis and Jewish community leaders accused Roth of cultural treason. “What is being done to silence this man?” Emanuel Rackman, the president of the Rabbinical Council of America, wrote. “Medieval Jews would have known what to do with him.”
    ellauri109.html on line 551: Kleinschmidt published a journal article in which he describes the case of a “successful Southern playwright” with an overbearing mother: “His rebellion was sexualized, leading to compulsive masturbation which provided an outlet for a myriad of hostile fantasies. These same masturbatory fantasies he both acted out and channeled into his writing.” Roth, who was obviously Kleinschmidt’s “playwright,” saw the article just after finishing the novel. He spent multiple sessions berating Kleinschmidt for this “psychoanalytic cartoon” and yet continued his analysis with him for years.
    ellauri109.html on line 553: When Martinson crashed dead 1968, the vengeful jew whistled all the way to the grave.
    ellauri109.html on line 555: Roth could not stand the lurid brand of notoriety. Years later, he told friends that he wished he’d never published “Portnoy’s Complaint.” It was by far his best-selling book.
    ellauri109.html on line 557: His habits were those of a monk: spartan diet and furnishings, regular exercise, crew-neck sweaters, sensible shoes, and strict hours. If he was not in his studio by nine, he would think, “Malamud has already been at it for two hours.”
    ellauri109.html on line 559: He told Bellow of his early work, “I kept being virtuous, and virtuous was destroying me. When I let the repellent in, I found that I was alive on my own terms.”
    ellauri109.html on line 563: Roth spent much of his life in pain. Many spinal surgeries followed his mishap in the Army. Diagnosed with heart disease before he was fifty, Roth lived with an acute sense of imminent catastrophe. In 1989, when he was fifty-six, he was swimming laps in his pool and was overwhelmed by chest pain. The next day, he had quintuple-bypass surgery.
    ellauri109.html on line 565: “Sabbath’s Theater” (1995). is probably the most profane of Roth’s novels; it was also his favorite, the book in which he felt himself to be utterly free and at his best. “Céline is my Proust,” he used to say.
    ellauri109.html on line 569: Roth was flattened by “Leaving a Doll’s House” and the bad publicity that came with it. He never got over it. “You know what Chekhov said when someone said to him ‘This too shall pass?’ ” Roth told Bailey. “ ‘Nothing passes.’ Put that in the fucking book.”
    ellauri109.html on line 571: In his fury and his hunger for retribution, Roth produced “Notes for My Biographer,” an obsessive, almost page-by-page rebuttal of Bloom’s memoir: “Adultery makes numerous bad marriages bearable and holds them together and in some cases can make the adulterer a far more decent husband or wife than . . . the domestic situation warrants. (See Madame Bovary for a pitiless critique of this phenomenon.)” Only at the last minute was Roth persuaded by friends and advisers not to publish the diatribe, but he could never put either of his marriages behind him for good. He was similarly incapable of setting aside much smaller grievances. As Benjamin Taylor, one of his closest late-in-life friends, put it in “Here We Are,” a loving, yet knowing, memoir, “The appetite for vengeance was insatiable. Philip could not get enough of getting even.”
    ellauri109.html on line 575: Roth’s mental health, like his physical health, proved less than stable. There were harrowing periods of depression; a Halcion-induced breakdown; stays at a psychiatric hospital.
    ellauri109.html on line 583: Roth asked Ross Miller to write his biography after his women friends Hermione Lee and Judith Thurman declined his invitations. He coached Miller on lines of questioning. He was particularly anxious for Miller to rebut “This whole mad fucking misogynistic bullshit!” “It wasn’t just ‘Fucked this one fucked that one fucked this one,’ ” he told Miller in one of their interviews.”
    ellauri109.html on line 585: Why shouldn’t I be treated as seriously as Colette on this? She gave a blow job to this guy in the railway station. Who gives a fuck about that? . . . That doesn’t tell me anything. What did hand jobs mean to her? Why did she like that?”
    ellauri109.html on line 595: He took victory laps at birthday celebrations and symposiums on his work. He accepted a medal from Barack Obama. In 2014, he was even awarded an honorary degree from the Jewish Theological Seminary. The headline the next day in The Forward read “Philip Roth, Once Outcast, Joins Jewish Fold.” There were, for a while, love affairs with much younger women, even talk of having a child. Then he retired from sex, too.
    ellauri109.html on line 597: In 2012, Roth invited Blake Bailey to his apartment, on West Seventy-ninth Street, for a kind of job interview. After quizzing Bailey on how a Gentile from Oklahoma could possibly write the life of a Jew from Newark, the deal was made. “I don’t want you to rehabilitate me,” Roth told him. “Just make me interesting.”
    ellauri109.html on line 599: As he had with Miller, Roth went to great lengths for Bailey, providing him letters, drafts, a photo album featuring his girlfriends. He wrote a lengthy memorandum for Bailey on a long-term affair with a local Norwegian-born physical therapist—the model for Drenka in “Sabbath’s Theater.”
    ellauri109.html on line 603: That first summer I spent a week in Connecticut, interviewing him six hours a day in his studio. Now and then we had to take bathroom breaks, and we could hear each other’s muffled streams through the door. One lovely sun-dappled afternoon I sat on his studio couch, listening to our greatest living novelist empty his bladder, and reflected that this was about as good as it gets for an American literary biographer.
    ellauri109.html on line 605: We learn of Roth’s generosity with unearned money he did not need (just like JFK, who was privately stingy as hell but basked in high-visibility free-of-charge charity) of his remarkable service in getting Milan Kundera published in English.
    ellauri109.html on line 609: At the University of Pennsylvania, a friend and colleague—acting, the friend admits, almost as a “pimp”—helped Roth fill the last seats in his oversubscribed classes with particularly attractive undergraduates. Roth’s treatment of a young woman named Felicity (a pseudonym), a friend and house guest of Claire Bloom’s daughter, is particularly disturbing. Roth made a sexual overture to Felicity, which she rebuffed; the next morning, he left her an irate note accusing her of “sexual hysteria.” When Bloom wrote about the incident in her memoir, Roth answered in his unpublished “Notes” with a sense of affront rather than penitence: “This is what people are. This is what people do. . . . Hate me for what I am, not for what I’m not.”
    ellauri109.html on line 611: The reaction to “Portnoy’s Complaint,” a decade later, was of another order. “This is the book for which all anti-Semites have been praying,” Gershom Scholem, the eminent scholar of Jewish history and mysticism, wrote. “I daresay that with the next turn of history, which will not be long delayed, this book will make all of us defendants at court.”
    ellauri109.html on line 613: Naurettava pelle. Mitä väliä maxetusta maxapalasta runkkukastikkeessa. GT-sählämien historian toistaminen Gazassa viimeisten filistealaisten tukassa is more to the point.
    ellauri109.html on line 615: Roth, who thought of religion as fairy tales and illusion, left strict instructions: no Kaddish, no God, no speeches. Roth had asked a range of friends to read passages from his novels. The mourners heard only the language of Roth and then shovelled dirt into his grave until it was full.
    ellauri109.html on line 666: On 1 December 1663 Dryden married the royalist sister of Sir Robert Howard—Lady Elizabeth. Dryden's works occasionally contain outbursts against the married state but also celebrations of the same. Little is known of the intimate side of his marriage. Lady Elizabeth bore three sons and outlived her husband. Se sai sitten luritella tota abit onusta, kun anus-Jussi kuoli ensinnä.
    ellauri109.html on line 669: Lady Elizabeth Dryden survived her husband, but went insane soon after his death. Their 3 children did not continue the line.
    ellauri109.html on line 701: Dryden was born in the village rectory of Aldwincle near Thrapston in Northamptonshire, where his maternal grandfather was the rector of All Saints. He was the eldest of fourteen children born to Erasmus Dryden and wife Mary Pickering, paternal grandson of Sir Erasmus Dryden, 1st Baronet (1553–1632), and wife Frances Wilkes, Puritan landowning gentry who supported the Puritan cause and Parliament. He was a second cousin once removed of Jonathan Swift.
    ellauri109.html on line 703: Dryden was trained in the art of rhetoric and the presentation of arguments for both sides of a given issue. This skill helped him turn his coat when the political winds took sudden turns.
    ellauri109.html on line 706: Dryden potkittiin pois Royal Societystä kun sillä oli jäsenmaxut rästissä. Shadwell vei siltä poeta laureatuxen paikan kun Dryden ei pokkuroinut protestanttisia Wilhoa ja Mariaa. Oliko viirikukko ruostunut? Dryden's main goal in the satiric verse: the mock-heroic Mac Flecknoe, was to "satirize Shadwell, ostensibly for his offenses against literature but more immediately we may suppose for his habitual badgering of him on the stage and in print." Thomas Shadwell succeeded him as Poet Laureate, and he was forced to give up his public offices and live by the proceeds of his pig pen.
    ellauri109.html on line 708: Of Dramatick Poesie (1668) was arguably the best of his essays. Unsurprisingly, Dryden constantly defended his own literary practice.
    ellauri109.html on line 709: Dryden's poem, "An Essay upon Satire," contained a number of attacks on King Charles II, his mistresses and courtiers, but most pointedly on the Earl of Rochester, a notorious womaniser. Rochester responded by hiring thugs who attacked Dryden whilst walking back from Will's Coffee House (a popular London coffee house where the Wits gathered to gossip, drink and conduct their business) back to his house on Gerrard Street. Dryden survived the attack, offering £50 for the identity of the thugs placed in the London Gazette, and a Royal Pardon if one of them would confess. No one claimed the reward.
    ellauri109.html on line 710: At around 8pm on 18 December 1679, Dryden was attacked in Rose Alley behind the Lamb & Flag pub, near his home in Covent Garden, by thugs hired by the Earl of Rochester, with whom he had a long-standing conflict. The pub was notorious for staging bare-knuckle prize fights, earning the nickname "The Bucket of Blood."
    ellauri109.html on line 712: Dryden translated works by Horace, Juvenal, Ovid, Lucretius, and Theocritus, a task which he found far more satisfying than writing for the stage. In 1694 he began work on what would be his most ambitious and defining work as translator, The Works of Virgil (1697), which was published by subscription. The publication of the translation of Virgil was a national event and brought Dryden the sum of £1,400. For example, take lines 789–795 of Book 2 when Aeneas sees and receives a message from the ghost of his wife, Creusa.
    ellauri109.html on line 722: Dryden translates it like this:
    ellauri109.html on line 734: El Lauri translates it like this:
    ellauri109.html on line 744: His best-known comedy was Marriage à la Mode (1673). In tragedy, his greatest success was All for Love (1678). Andrew Chesterman thinks he is translators' patron saint.
    ellauri109.html on line 749: One of the first attacks on Dryden's reputation was by William Wordsworth, who complained that Dryden's descriptions of natural objects in his translations from Virgil were much inferior to the originals. However, several of Wordsworth's contemporaries, such as George Crabbe, Lord Byron, and Walter Scott (who edited Dryden's works), were still keen admirers of Dryden.
    ellauri109.html on line 750: John Keats admired the "Fables. " Matthew Arnold famously dismissed him. T. S. Eliot wrote that he was "his ancestor," and had like Eliot a "commonplace mind."
    ellauri109.html on line 753: A heroic couplet is a traditional form for English poetry, commonly used in epic and narrative poetry, and consisting of a rhyming pair of lines in iambic pentameter. Use of the heroic couplet was pioneered by Geoffrey Chaucer in the Legend of Good Women and the Canterbury Tales, and generally considered to have been perfected by John Dryden and Alexander Pope in the Restoration Age and early 18th century respectively. A frequently-cited example illustrating the use of heroic couplets is this passage from Cooper's Hill by John Denham, part of his description of the Thames:
    ellauri109.html on line 797: Two draft notices arrived in the post simultaneously. One for Hagit - and one for Hanna. This is another hallmark of missing baby stories.
    ellauri109.html on line 818: Netanyahu said this marked a new era of transparency and would "right an historic wrong".
    ellauri109.html on line 827: "Zionism - what is it really about?" asks Rafi Shubeli, a Yemenite-Israeli historian and activist from the group Our Brothers Do Exist.
    ellauri109.html on line 829: "There are very many elements in Israeli society who want to avoid this kind of discussion."
    ellauri109.html on line 838: "In some cases this might have happened: one, two, three, four, 10 - 100-1000 don't know how many," he says.
    ellauri109.html on line 846: At a beachside cafe in Haifa, I meet a philosopher who is physical about how his life was shaped by being snatched.
    ellauri109.html on line 848: Photographs show he had a darker complexion than his relatives and school friends.
    ellauri109.html on line 849: However, it was not until he reached his twenties that he discovered what much of his close-knit community already knew: he was adopted.
    ellauri109.html on line 851: She always feared losing him and so, out of respect for his adoptive parents, it was only after they died that Yehuda opened his adoption file.
    ellauri109.html on line 852: This showed no signature of consent from his Yemenite biological mother and gave only her first name, Zahara.
    ellauri109.html on line 857: His biological siblings had never been told of the existence of an older brother and were unable to explain the circumstances of his adoption.
    ellauri109.html on line 858: However, they were able to give some information on his roots and Yehuda is delighted to be getting to know them better.
    ellauri109.html on line 859: "I'm happy the circle was completed and I now know the history, the origin and I know which family [I'm from] from a genetic point of view," he says.
    ellauri109.html on line 861: "You cannot regret what happened in the past. This is my life. I accept it as it is." The remaining 10-100-1000- I dont know how many holocaust victims should take the same attitude. Shit happens because the two-legged apes are predominantly assholes, out of which nothing better can come out but turds.
    ellauri110.html on line 93: Silloin kuuluu eräältä seinustalta: --Ek-sinä tiedä, että sin'et isottele pikkupojille silloin kun on isoja miehiä. Toinen ähki selkä seinää vasten sanomatta sanaa. Isku läjähti. Sähisevää sanattomuutta. --No! Pihamaalta rupesi kuulumaan joukkopuhelua...
    ellauri110.html on line 111: Yahoo! on lopetettu. Sieltä ei saa enää vastauxia kaikkiin kysymyxiin kuten Quorasta. Se oli virzarakon syöpään kuolleen kiltin Matti Keijolan mielipaikka. Sen jonka isä oli Wilhon kollega. Meidän yhteisen projektin nimi oli 4M. Maintenance Man, sovinistisesti nimetty, vaikka 2 huoltomiehistä oli naisia. Mä menin sen väittäjäisiin tummassa puvussa, kaikilla muilla oli frakki. Kyllä harmitti, oishan mulla ollut kaapintäysi frakkeja. Teekkarit on aika hienostelevia. Mä poltin 4M:n loput mainospaperit saunan uunissa.
    ellauri110.html on line 117: The author (Kulliverbi) sets out as captain of a ship. His men conspire against him, confine him a long time to his cabin, and set him on shore in an unknown land. He travels up into the country. The Yahoos, a strange sort of animal, described. The author meets two Houyhnhnms.
    ellauri110.html on line 122: Gulliver's visit to the Land of the Houyhnhnms is described in Part IV of his Travels, and its location illustrated on the map at the start of Part IV.
    ellauri110.html on line 135: It is possible to interpret the Houyhnhnms in a number of different ways. One interpretation could be a sign of Swift's liberal views on race, or one could regard Gulliver's preference (and his immediate division of Houyhnhnms into color-based hierarchies) as absurd and the sign of his self-deception. It is now generally accepted that the story involving the Houyhnhnms embody a wholly pessimistic view of the place of man and the meaning of his existence in the universe. In a modern context the story might be seen as presenting an early example of animal rights concerns, especially in Gulliver's account of how horses are cruelly treated in his society and the reversal of roles. The story is a possible inspiration for Pierre Boulle's novel Planet of the Apes.
    ellauri110.html on line 137: Book IV of Gulliver's Travels is the keystone, in some ways, of the entire work,[citation needed] and critics have traditionally answered the question whether Gulliver is insane (and thus just another victim of Swift's satire) by questioning whether or not the Houyhnhnms are truly admirable. Gulliver loves the land and is obedient to a race that is not like his own. The Houyhnhnm society is based upon reason, and only upon reason, and therefore the horses practice eugenics based on their analyses of benefit and cost. They have no religion and their sole morality is the defence of reason, and so they are not particularly moved by pity or a belief in the intrinsic value of life. Gulliver himself, in their company, builds the sails of his skiff from "Yahoo skins".
    ellauri110.html on line 139: The Houyhnhnms' lack of passion surfaces during the scheduled visit of "a friend and his family" to the home of Gulliver's master "upon some affair of importance". On the day of the visit, the mistress of his friend and her children arrive very late. She made no excuses "first for her husband" who had died just that morning and she had to remain to make the proper arrangements for a "convenient place where his body should be laid". Gulliver remarked that "she behaved herself at our house as cheerfully as the rest".
    ellauri110.html on line 141: A further example of the lack of humanity and emotion in the Houyhnhnms is that their laws reason that each couple produce two children, one male and one female. In the event that a marriage produced two offspring of the same sex, the parents would take their children to the annual meeting and trade one with a couple who produced two children of the opposite sex. This was viewed as his spoofing and or criticising the notion that the "ideal" family produces children of both sexes. George Orwell viewed the Houyhnhnm society as one whose members try to be as close to dead as possible while alive and matter as little as possible in life and death.
    ellauri110.html on line 152: In the shipping lanes he is rescued by a Portuguese sea captain, a level-headed individual albeit full of concern for others, whose temperament at one level appears intermediate between the calm, rational Houyhnhnms of Houyhnhnmland and the norm of corrupt, European humanity, which Gulliver no longer distinguishes from Houyhnhnmland's wild Yahoos. Gulliver can speak with him, and though now disaffected from all humanity, he began to tolerate his company. Gulliver is returned to his home and family, finds their smell and look intolerable and all his countrymen no better than "Yahoos", purchases and converses with two stabled horses, tolerates the stable boy, and assures the reader of his account's utter veracity.
    ellauri110.html on line 177: Sitä mukaa myös sexuaalinen nälkä, omanarvontunne kasvaa, roimahousuissa pölhö pöyhistyy. Hannu bylsii jurrissa veneen keulakajuutassa virolaista kurtisaania. Sekö auttaa?
    ellauri110.html on line 302: The first mention of the story dates back to 26 November 1895 when Chekhov, writing from Melikhovo, informed his correspondent Elena Shavrova: "I am writing now a small story called 'My Bride'." [Моя невеста, Moya nevesta]." He went on: "Once I had a bride... That is what they'd called her: Missyuss. My love for her was strong. That is what I am writing about." Whom did he mean exactly, remained unclear.
    ellauri110.html on line 306: According to Anton Chekhov's brother Mikhail, the story's location was the village Bogimovo in Kaluga Governorate where Chekhov had spent the summer of 1891. Mikhail Chekhov also names the prototypes for the landlord Belokurov and his partner Lyubov Ivanovna as E.D. Bylim-Kolosovsky and his wife Amnesia.
    ellauri110.html on line 308: Sofia Prorokova, the author of Isaak Levitan's biography, suggested that the house with a terrace and a mezzanine in question might have been the one belonging to Anna N. Turchaninova, whose Gorka estate in the Tver Governorate Chekhov visited in the summer of 1895.According to Prorokova, the story might have been based upon the difficult relationship Levitan had with the Turchaninova sisters (hence the similarity in surnames), of whom the younger one, Varvara, the possible prototype for Zhenya (Missyuss), had a bizarre diminutive nickname, Lyulyu. This view was shared by the literary historian Leonid Grossman.
    ellauri110.html on line 320: The painter discovers a kindred spirit in Lydia's younger sister Zhenya, a dreamy and sensitive girl who spends her time reading, admiring him painting and having long walks. The two fall in love, and an evening comes when, after a walk, the painter lets his feelings out in a passionate outburst. Zhenya responds in kind, but feels she has to tell her mother and sister about their love immediately.
    ellauri110.html on line 322: The following day he learns that Zhenya and her mother had departed. A boy hands him a note from Znenya, which reads: "I have told my sister everything and she insists on my parting from you. I could not hurt her by disobeying. God will give you happiness. If you knew how bitterly mamma and I have cried." The painter leaves the place too. The last glimpse of hope to fill his lonely life with any kind of meaning is now gone, and the person who robbed him of it was Lydia, the one who cared for nothing but bettering other people's lives. Time passes, but he cannot forget Zhenya and deep in his heart knows she still thinks of him, too.
    ellauri110.html on line 335: Samuel Pepys PRS (/piːps/ PEEPS; 23 February 1633 – 26 May 1703) was an administrator of the navy of England and Member of Parliament who is most famous for the diary he kept for a decade while still a relatively young man. Pepys had no maritime experience, but he rose to be the Chief Secretary to the Admiralty under both King Charles II and King James II through patronage, diligence, and his talent for administration. His influence and reforms at the Admiralty were important in the early professionalisation of the Royal Navy.
    ellauri110.html on line 344: The diary gives a detailed account of Pepys's personal life. He was fond of wine, plays, and the company of other people. He also spent time evaluating his fortune and his place in the world. He was always curious and often acted on that curiosity, as he acted upon almost all his impulses. Periodically, he would resolve to devote more time to hard work instead of leisure. For example, in his entry for New Year's Eve, 1661, he writes: "I have newly taken a solemn oath about abstaining from plays and wine…" The following months reveal his lapses to the reader; by 17 February, it is recorded, "Here I drank wine upon necessity, being ill for the want of it."
    ellauri110.html on line 346: He was known to be brutal to his servants, once beating a servant Jane with a broom until she cried. He kept a boy servant whom he frequently beat with a cane, a birch rod, a whip or a rope's end.
    ellauri110.html on line 349: Propriety did not prevent him from engaging in a number of extramarital liaisons with various women that were chronicled in his diary, often in some detail when relating the intimate details. The most dramatic of these encounters was with Deborah Willet, a young woman engaged as a companion for Elisabeth Pepys. On 25 October 1668, Pepys was surprised by his wife as he embraced Deb Willet; he writes that his wife "coming up suddenly, did find me imbracing the girl con [with] my hand sub [under] su [her] coats; and endeed I was with my main [hand] in her cunny. I was at a wonderful loss upon it and the girl also...." Following this event, he was characteristically filled with remorse, but (equally characteristically) continued to pursue Willet after she had been dismissed from the Pepys household. Pepys also had a habit of fondling the breasts of his maid Mary Mercer while she dressed him in the morning.
    ellauri110.html on line 351: Pepys may also have dallied with a leading actress of the Restoration period, Mary Knep. "Mrs Knep was the wife of a Smithfield horsedealer, and the mistress of Pepys"—or at least "she granted him a share of her favours". He called her husband "an ill, melancholy, jealous-looking fellow" and suspected him of abusing his wife. Knep provided Pepys with backstage access and was a conduit for theatrical and social gossip. When they wrote notes to each other, Pepys signed himself "Dapper Dickey", while Knep was "Barbry Allen" (a popular song that was an item in her musical repertory).
    ellauri110.html on line 668: Vallasta on uskonnossa kysymys ja nöyristelystä, normaalisti miesten mutta myös nykynaisten, senkin olen kokenut. Toinen puhuu ja päättää, toinen kuuntelee ja tottelee, ah niin tuttua. On voittajia ja häviäjiä, löysiä kukkoja ja typeriä kanoja. Haisevia sillejä. Den glider in. Kuka pani sisään? Ilmaveivillä. Isis on kauhistuttavaa, ja persut. Hande on tyypillinen suomalainen talousliberaali äijä.
    ellauri110.html on line 755: Mutta ei ainoastaan tohtori von Gitzen, waan monta muuta oppinutta ja kirkon historiasfa hywin perehtynyttä miestä oli ryhtynyt keskusteluun fen faman juutalaifen kansfa ja oliwat tiedustelleet häneltä monia kirkkohistorian alalle kuuluwia feikkoja ja tapaukfia. Heidän kyfymyfiinfä oli juutalaien aina antanut totuudenmukaifia ja heidän ajatukfenfa mukaan oikeita wastaukfia, niin että he fiitä oliwat kaikki fuuresti kummastukfisfaan.
    ellauri110.html on line 767: Wuonna 1759 Kefäkuun 12:ta päiwänä oli Wernamon markkinoille faapunut tuntematon mies,fuuri ja luja wartaloltaan, pitkäpartainen ja wanhanaikaifella ulkonäpllä, kantaen feläsfään laatikkoa, jommoista fuutarit käyttiwät. Hän oli puettuna pitkään takkiin, jonka päälline noli tuhottu hewosenjouhista, houfut ja liiwi oliwat kameelinnahasta, fekä pääsfä päähine, talwilakin kaltainen, tehty tiikerintaljasta. Hän näytti hywin furullifelta, ja kun häneltä kyfyttiin, kuka hän oli, oli hän wastannut, että hän oli tuo onneton fuutari, ja oli hän monella tawalla kehoittanut kanfaa tekemään parannusta. Seuraawana päiwänä hän taas oli poisfa.
    ellauri110.html on line 835: Se on Handea 25v nuorempi. Joku taidehistorioizija. 5v kesti tääkin viritys. Sen isä oli psykoanalyytikko ja Kakolan ylilääkäri. Ei tainnut varoituxet langeta hyvään maahan Anna tyttärellä.
    ellauri110.html on line 916: Смирись, Зои получила 30% пациентов в этом квартале. Face it, Zoe got her 30% of patients for this quarter.
    ellauri110.html on line 956: "He has a movie poster face with a full mane of white hair and a Rasputin like goatee, like a more handsome Uncle Ben. Since his return shortly after the revolutionary victory he has been in and out of favor, then in again. Fernández has settled comfortably into a position of responsibility and respect. He is one of the OWs, the Official Writers."
    ellauri110.html on line 1048: “Once upon a time, mendicants, there was a Teacher called Araka. He was a religious founder and was free of sensual desire. He had many hundreds of disciples, and he taught them like this: ‘Brahmins, life as a human is short, brief, and fleeting, full of pain and misery. Think about this and wake up! Do what’s good and live the spiritual life, for no-one born can escape death.
    ellauri110.html on line 1050: It’s like a drop of dew on a grass tip. When the sun comes up it quickly evaporates and doesn’t last long. In the same way, life as a human is like a dew-drop. It’s brief and fleeting, full of pain and misery. Think about this and wake up! Do what’s good and live the spiritual life, for no-one born can escape death.
    ellauri110.html on line 1058: It’s like a strong man who has formed a glob of spit on the tip of his tongue. He could easily spit it out. In the same way, life as a human is like a glob of spit. …
    ellauri110.html on line 1062: It’s like a cow being led to the slaughter. With every step she comes closer to the slaughter, closer to death. In the same way, life as a human is like a cow being slaughtered. It’s brief and fleeting, full of pain and misery. Think about this and wake up! Do what’s good and live the spiritual life, for no-one born can escape death.’
    ellauri110.html on line 1064: Now, mendicants, at that time human beings had a life span of 60,000 years. Girls could be married at 500 years of age. And human beings only had six afflictions: cold, heat, hunger, thirst, and the need to defecate and urinate. But even though humans were so long-lived with so few afflictions, Araka still taught in this way: ‘Life as a human is short, brief, and fleeting, full of pain and misery. Think about this and wake up! Do what’s good and live the spiritual life, for no-one born can escape death.’
    ellauri110.html on line 1066: These days it’d be right to say: ‘Life as a human is short, brief, and fleeting, full of pain and misery. Think about this and wake up! Do what’s good and live the spiritual life, for no-one born can escape death.’ For these days a long life is a hundred years or a little more. Living for a hundred years, there are just three hundred seasons, a hundred each of the winter, summer, and rains. Living for three hundred seasons, there are just twelve hundred months, four hundred in each of the winter, summer, and rains. Living for twelve hundred months, there are just twenty-four hundred fortnights, eight hundred in each of the winter, summer, and rains. Living for 2,400 fortnights, there are just 36,000 days, 12,000 in each of the summer, winter, and rains. Living for 36,000 days, you just eat 72,000 meals, 24,000 in each of the summer, winter, and rains, including when you’re suckling at the breast, and when you’re prevented from eating.
    ellauri110.html on line 1068: Things that prevent you from eating include anger, pain, sickness, sabbath, or being unable to get food. So mendicants, for a human being with a hundred years life span I have counted the life span, the limit of the life span, the seasons, the years, the months, the fortnights, the nights, the days, the meals, and the things that prevent them from eating. Out of compassion, I’ve done what a teacher should do who wants what’s best for their disciples. Here are these roots of trees, and here are these empty huts. Practice absorption, mendicants! Don’t be negligent! Don’t regret it later! This is my instruction to you.”
    ellauri110.html on line 1077: I hope that a revised version of these conversations will eventually appear in book form. This published version will include extensive accompanying notes, indicating the sources of the views ascribed to Dostoevsky and, where relevant, references to secondary literature. This will especially be in cases where, for example, the views spoken by Dostoevsky may involve controversial points of interpretation or where his own documented views may require comment for twenty-first century readers. However, this is primarily a work of fiction and although it is supported by scholarship and, I hope, raises questions that are of interest to scholars, it is to be read in the way we might read any work of fiction, where whatever instruction the work may offer is accompanied by a element of entertainment.
    ellauri110.html on line 1079: The blog is intended to develop in a dialogical fashion and I hope that readers will contact me with any critical comments, whether these relate to style or content. Despite what I have just said about fiction, it is my wish that the eventual book will present an interpretation of Dostoevsky’s thought discussed that is fully defensible with regard to the available sources and I welcome any comments drawing attention to actual errors or significant misrepresentations. In this way, the blog itself will, I hope, set in motion a kind of conversation, alongside all the other amazing conversations about Dostoevsky that are happening in reality, in print, and online. This is work in progress and I hope not only to entertain and instruct but also to learn.
    ellauri110.html on line 1081: A final thought is that although Dostoevsky himself did not write a blog, there is something blog-like in his Diary of a Writer, a self-published opinion piece that ranged freely over the most apparently disparate issues. To those who fear that blogging and other forms of information technology are inherently antagonistic to the values of great literature (I mean Dostoevsky and not myself, of course), I suggest that it is not a medium of which he would have been afraid. Perhaps even one he would have relished.
    ellauri110.html on line 1108: Crime and Punishment focuses on the mental anguish and moral dilemmas of Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov, an impoverished ex-student in St. Petersburg who theorizes that he can perform good deeds to counterbalance his crime, justifying his actions by referencing Napoleon Bonaparte. The novel is considered one of the greatest novels ever written.
    ellauri110.html on line 1117: The first work produced after his time in a prison camp, Uncle’s Dream might be the funniest writing by Fyodor Dostoevsky.
    ellauri110.html on line 1118: One of the early books of Fyodor Dosteyskey, this book had been curiously categorised under comedy. It felt more Oscar Wilde without the wit than FD to me.
    ellauri110.html on line 1120: The result was Uncle´s Dream, set in a provincial city much like Semipalatinsk (now Semey in Kazakhstan), where he was serving with the Seventh Line Battalion awaiting his restoration to civil society.
    ellauri110.html on line 1121: Uncle was Prince K, a doddering and decrepit old fop who has come into money and who is paying a visit to the provinces. Maria Alexandrovna decides to try to marry off her beautiful young daughter Zenaida to him, but the whole town has had a snootful of her and tries to buck her plans at every turn. Still, she manages to come out in the end after a series of reverses. Not for nothing does Dosto compare her (too)xo to Napoleon Bonaparte. Dosto bore a grudge to the French and English because they had laughed at his accent. Napoleon and Shakespeare, damn the lot.
    ellauri110.html on line 1126: I have said that I often miss humor in books. I don´t think I missed much in this one. The humor is farcical and broad. It was fascinating to see the great heavyweight of the philosophical novel doing farce.
    ellauri110.html on line 1131: There´s something very Jane Austen about this novella. Or an accelerated, less monotonous version of Tolstoy´s Anna Karenina.
    ellauri111.html on line 37: Westerners love psychobabble. American conservatives consider Devils a definitive refutation of socialism. His writing is phantastic but his messages are delusional. The entire Russian literature is depressing. Dostoevsky is theatrical. Apparently, Fyodor improves a lot in translation.
    ellauri111.html on line 106: Roman Catholics may tell you, "You Protestants are missing part of the Bible. We have the rest of it." These people's leaders (popes, priests, etc.) have led them astray to this wrong belief. This comment about missing books can throw people off, but it no longer has to. These popish additions to the Bible are commonly called the Apocrypha or sometimes the Deuterocanonical books. This is a short treatise on WHY these books are not in the Bible.
    ellauri111.html on line 112: At the Council of Trent (1546) the Roman Catholic institution pronounced the following apocryphal books sacred. They asserted that the apocryphal books together with unwritten tradition are of God and are to be received and venerated as the Word of God. So now you have the Bible, the Apocrypha and Catholic Tradition as co-equal sources of truth for the Catholic. In reality, it seems obvious that the Bible is the last source of truth for Catholics. Roman Catholic doctrine comes primarily from tradition stuck together with a few Bible names. In my reading of Catholic materials, I find notes like this: "You have to keep the Bible in perspective." Catholics have been deceived into not believing that the Bible is God's complete revelation for man (but they can come out of these deceptions in an instant if they will only believe the Bible as it is written) .
    ellauri111.html on line 152: Because of these and other reasons, the apocryphal books are only valuable as ancient documents illustrative of the manners, language, opinions and history of the East.
    ellauri111.html on line 156: The King James translators never considered the Apocrypha the word of God. As books of some historical value (e.g., details of the Maccabean revolt), the Apocrypha was sandwiched between the Old and New Testaments as an appendix of reference material. This followed the format that Luther had used. Luther prefaced the Apocrypha with a statement:
    ellauri111.html on line 160: In 1599, TWELVE YEARS BEFORE the King James Bible was published, King James himself said this about the Apocrypha:
    ellauri111.html on line 168: Not that this really means anything. The truth is not validated by the false. Nevertheless, this may be of interest to some... Jerome (340-420) rejected the Apocrypha:
    ellauri111.html on line 176: According to Edward Hills in The King James Version Defended p. 98 other famous Catholics with this viewpoint include Augustine (354-430 who at first defended the Apocrypha as canonical), Pope Gregory the Great (540-604), Cardinal Ximenes, and Cardinal Cajetan.
    ellauri111.html on line 194: While well known, Geronimo was not a chief of the Chiricahua or the Bedonkohe band. However, since he was a superb leader in raiding and warfare, he frequently led large numbers of men beyond his own following. At any one time, he would be in command of about 30 to 50 Apaches. You and what army? asked the bluecoats with a smirk.
    ellauri111.html on line 196: During Geronimo's final period of conflict from 1876 to 1886, he surrendered three times and accepted life on the Apache reservations in Arizona. When Geronimo surrendered to General Nelson Miles for the last time in 1886, he said "This is the fourth time I have surrendered". Reservation life was confining to the free-moving Apache people, and they resented restrictions on their customary way of life. These restrictions included directives against wife beating and mutilation of women for adultery, and directives against the manufacture of Tiswin, an alcoholic drink fermented from corn.
    ellauri111.html on line 202: While holding him as a prisoner, the United States capitalized on Geronimo’s fame among non-Indians by displaying him at various events. For Geronimo, it provided him with an opportunity to make a little money. In 1898, for example, Geronimo was exhibited at the Trans-Mississippi and International Exhibition in Omaha, Nebraska. Following this exhibition, he became a frequent "visitor" to fairs, exhibitions, and other public functions.
    ellauri111.html on line 204: Wow! What an opportunity! He made money by selling pictures of himself, bows and arrows, buttons off his shirt, and even his hat. In 1905, the Indian Office "provided" Geronimo for the inaugural parade for President Theodore Roosevelt. Later that year, the Indian Office "took" him to Texas, where he shot a buffalo in a roundup staged by 101 Ranch Real Wild West for the National Editorial Association. Geronimo was escorted to the event by soldiers, as he was still a prisoner. The teachers who witnessed the staged buffalo hunt were unaware that Geronimo’s people were not buffalo hunters. Aargh!
    ellauri111.html on line 216: “So, the husband – just what is it he’s got to do to get out of his despair? What is this step he’s got to take?”
    ellauri111.html on line 218: Fyodor Mikhailovich sat back and closed his eyes for a moment before looking at me almost apologetically.
    ellauri111.html on line 224: “But surely he is guilty – and knows it. Isn’t that the whole point of his confession, telling the whole world how guilty he is?”
    ellauri111.html on line 228: “The question is: what is guilt and what is it to be guilty or to confess your guilt? Most people don’t understand this at all. They think it’s just a matter of fact – did he or didn’t he do it? If he did, he’s guilty, if he didn’t, he’s not guilty. Remember what Ivan Karamazov said, that everyone wants to kill their father – but the world knows many of these mental parricides as obedient and loving sons, who are not guilty of anything.”
    ellauri111.html on line 239: “Er, no,” I had to admit, slightly confused. Perhaps the whisky hadn’t been such a good idea.
    ellauri111.html on line 241: “It’s strange,” he said, almost as if he was talking to himself. “My English and American readers don’t seem to read it very much. Of course, I do say some rude things about England in it and I know what they say in return—that’s it’s full of Russian jingoism, all very retrograde and reactionary. In my own view, though, it has some of the best things I’ve ever written in it. In fact, that’s where you’ll find this story we’re talking about right now.”
    ellauri111.html on line 243: “Really? I thought it was just a short story, like in this collection here.”
    ellauri111.html on line 249: “I know, I know,” he replied consolingly. “It is a short story, but it’s also what one of my friends on this side would call ‘a thought experiment’. We can talk more of that another time, but I’m digressing. You see there’s a lot in the Diary about guilt and what it means to be guilty. Not fiction, but real life, cases that happened in Russia, in my own time, not unlike quite a lot of cases happening in your country today—alas.”
    ellauri111.html on line 255: As I’d had to admit, I hadn’t read The Diary of a Writer (actually a kind of journal that Dostoevsky published monthly and that consisted entirely of his own thoughts about issues of the day), but I did know that he had been involved in several criminal cases, some of which were about the kind of cruelty to children that Ivan Karamazov cited as evidence against the existence of God. I couldn’t remember any details, though. I felt rather like a student who hasn’t done his homework hoping that he’s not the one going to be asked the next question. Only there wasn’t anyone else to ask. In the event, Fyodor Mikhailovich let me off fairly gently.
    ellauri111.html on line 261: “I suppose you know that jury trials were still quite an innovation in my time in Russia, so it’s no surprise that they produced some odd results. A clever lawyer could easily persuade a jury one way or another. Even when all the facts pointed to the guilt of the accused, even when it was admitted that, indeed, such-and-such a woman had attacked her lover’s wife with a razor with the intention of killing her, such-and-such a father had so violently beaten his seven-year old daughter with birch rods that even the neighbours were terrified by her screams, or such-and-such parents had treated their children like animals, keeping them in filthy conditions, and beating them with leather straps, again and again—each time our poor soft-hearted jurors concluded ‘Not guilty!’ Can you imagine? Of course, there is always an explanation, there are always attenuating circumstances, there can even be provocations, and the letter of the law may tell us this is not torture but simply punishment, the kind of punishment that, in those days, all good middle-class parents thought it right to mete out so as to give their children a sense of duty. The facts. The facts are the facts, but the truth once uttered is a lie, and even the facts can be put together in such a way as to turn even torture into well-meaning parental discipline.”
    ellauri111.html on line 263: As Fyodor Mikhailovich spoke, he became quite agitated. His face narrowed and his eyes flashed. At first he had just tapped his fingers intermittently on the arms of his chair but as he went on he started to wave his hands around with increasing energy. Whatever he had seen in the world he now inhabited, it was clear that he was still unreconciled to the outrages that adult human beings inflict on children, who, as he had said in The Brothers Karamazov, hadn’t eaten that fatal apple. I didn’t know the details of the cases he was talking about, but I couldn’t help thinking about a particularly horrifying case that had recently happened here in Scotland. I’ll spare you the details.
    ellauri111.html on line 265: “I’m sorry,” he said, taking a breath (or what seemed like a breath). “As I say, even here there are times when I could wish for a cigarette—or even a good whisky”, he added with a smile, nodding reassuringly at me.
    ellauri111.html on line 267: “But I repeat,” he continued after a moment, raising his hands dramatically, “I am not demanding the maximum penalty of the law, not even for these torturers. I do not want them imprisoned, beaten, or executed, though I understand the outrage of people who do. Remember, when Ivan asked Alyosha what to do about the general who’d had the little boy torn to pieces by his dogs, even mild, sweet-tempered Alyosha said ‘Shoot him’. But that doesn’t help either. Just because I wrote a novel called Crime and Punishment, people imagine I’m obsessed with punishing. Not at all. All I want is that the guilty are not acquitted. That their guilt is clearly stated. And that they accept it—that’s the most important of all. Let them be found guilty—and let them go free.”
    ellauri111.html on line 273: By this time he was shaking his right index finger, not unlike a judge scolding the prisoner in the dock. Slowly, he lowered his hand, till it came to rest again on the chair.
    ellauri111.html on line 279: I had been quite carried away watching (as well as listening to) his peroration. He had been gradually raising his voice as well as his hands and I wondered vaguely whether Laura might have been disturbed. But all of this seemed to be at a tangent to what we had been talking about and the devastating climax of A Gentle Spirit.
    ellauri111.html on line 281: “But our husband—how does this connect to him?” I asked. “I mean, surely he does acknowledge his guilt. The whole story is in a way his confession, isn’t it?”
    ellauri111.html on line 283: Fyodor Mikhailovich thought for a few seconds, gently nodding his head.
    ellauri111.html on line 285: “In a way, yes. But only in a way. It seems to me that he has still not acknowledged what he did to her, only how it has affected him. It is not her misery but his own solitude that bothers him: how he can go on living without her.”
    ellauri111.html on line 289: “Yes, yes, yes—but why? Why is he doing this? Let me give you another example, a better known one, I think. You remember that in The Possessed (which, by the way, isn’t quite what my title means, though it’s quite good in its own way), I had Stavrogin go to Bishop Tikhon to confess how he’d raped a twelve-year old girl and then just waited in the next room while she hung herself?”
    ellauri111.html on line 293: “Nor was I, though it was very frustrating. But you will also remember that he didn’t just go to confess his sin in the way that a normal penitent does: he had even arranged for a full copy to be printed, ready to be published for the world to see.”
    ellauri111.html on line 297: “Now some people might think that was a sign of how deeply he had repented, allowing himself to be shamed before the whole word. But, as I hope you also remember, Bishop Tikhon could see that wanting to publicize your guilt in that way is not necessarily the same as really accepting it, inwardly. Wanting to be seen – and maybe even admired – as a great sinner is not quite the same as actually repenting. And perhaps that’s how it is here too. Of course, if you want to be fussy, you could say that he’s just talking to himself. He’s not produced a written, let alone a printed, confession. I’m the one who wrote it, not him. And yet, it’s as if he’s rehearsing his story for the benefit of the world, for the imaginary audience we each of us have inside our heads.”
    ellauri111.html on line 301: Fyodor Mikhailovich seemed pleased at my remark, shaking his whole upper body in approval.
    ellauri111.html on line 303: “Exactly! It’s a performance. It’s not the heart speaking. The heart would say something very different. In fact, the heart wouldn’t need to say very much at all: it has only one thing to say, to love and to ask for love, to forgive and to ask forgiveness. We’ve been talking about people who commit crimes but won’t own up to what they’ve done, people who want to say to anyone who’ll listen: ‘Not guilty! My conscience is clear! Don’t blame me!’ But the real problem is not the evidence of the facts—did he or didn’t he do this or say that. The real problem is that this is completely back to front. The person who loves, even if they haven’t committed any crimes, is the person who wants to be guilty, who doesn’t just want to forgive but wants to be forgiven; the person who thinks of themselves not only as guilty but infinitely guilty, guilty of everything, before everyone, in fact the guiltiest one of all.”
    ellauri111.html on line 311: “The person who loves is the person who wants to be guilty.” Yes! This is the profound essence of “All are responsible to all for all.” Love your blog.
    ellauri111.html on line 320: Skoptsit eli kuohilaat ahisteli aikoinaan Pietari Suurta kuin pierevää suutaria Liisan vannassa. Fedja-sedästä Shakespeare oli tärkeämpi saappaita. Isänmaa ja jumala oli vielä tärkeämpiä. Sen mielestä Shakespeare ja Rafael, (ja by implication, Dosto ize) ovat tärkeämpiä kuin orjien vapautus, kansallisuusaate, sosialismi, kemia, ize asiassa koko apinoiden laahus, koska ne ovat apinoiden parasta antia, omenia ihan yläoxilta. Pentti Linkolalla oli laahuxesta samanlainen näkemys: apinakunnan parhaat saavutuxet on Beethovenin musiikki, puolukkasurvos ja munatoti.
    ellauri111.html on line 330: Credits for this howto go to Bible Dudes.
    ellauri111.html on line 333: How to get to heaven? If you ask most people this question, they might say something like, "If you do more good things than bad things, God will probably let you into heaven." No! That kind of thinking will reserve your place in hell.
    ellauri111.html on line 339: The same thing applies to us as sinners, in principle. We have sinned against God's law and we are criminals--lying, stealing, killing, committing whoredom, taking candy from kids, etc. We have sinned and payment must be made for our crimes. God's penal code for any of these transgressions is rather steep - whatever it is, go to hell and the lake of fire forever, i.e. an eternity of burning in a grill. But don't worry, this need not happen, for:
    ellauri111.html on line 341: We just need to repent of our sins and call on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ who already paid the penalty of our sins with his own blood on the cross about 2,000 years ago. Of course he did not remain dead--he rose from the dead on the third day, which was seen by over 500 brethren (not at once, but serially) and is now seated at the right hand of the throne of God. (We haven't got witnesses for that, but believe me he does!).
    ellauri111.html on line 343: You need FAITH in the blood of Jesus to get into heaven. THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, God manifested in the flesh, WAS CRUCIFIED [nailed to the cross through his hands and his feet] FOR OUR SINS AS OUR SUBSTITUTE. Talk about scapegoat! In order to be saved and get into heaven, literally all you need to do is
    ellauri111.html on line 347: BELIEVE in the Lord Jesus Christ--his death, his burial, and his resurrection from the dead.
    ellauri111.html on line 351: This is somehow different than just trying to be good enough, which we cannot do on our own. You see it's not really at all about goodness, it's all about obedience. To be saved, WE REPENT OF OUR OLD WAYS, BELIEVE IN JESUS, AND TRY TO OBEY HIS WORD. Then, as we strive to obey him/us, he helps us to obey him/us.
    ellauri111.html on line 357: Luckily, the Lord Jesus Christ SHED HIS BLOOD on your sins. He is perfect. He is way more than simply past, he is pluperfect. But he is future too, futurum exactum to be exact. He will have been here a second time. He specifically came to this earth from Mars or Venus as a man to die in your place. He is God manifested in the flesh. (Except the other bearded guy is still sitting up there watching it all happen, don't ask us how, asking stupid questions is not good for you.) . He came down here to save you from the GUILT of past sins and from the POWER of sin over your life. (Pay attention to the capitals, we capitalize stuff that is of capital importance.)
    ellauri111.html on line 365: The gospel is God's last message to mankind. If you will yield to the gospel of Jesus Christ, you will be reconciled to God and you will escape eternal damnation in hell and the lake of fire. Besides all of this, you will have abudant life right now as you walk with the Creator of the universe, the Lord Jesus Christ. All of this in spite of all the woes that the world will throw at you.
    ellauri111.html on line 375: I John 5:11 ...God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
    ellauri111.html on line 381: To get into heaven, you have to REPENT of your sins and BELIEVE the gospel of Jesus Christ (ref. Mark 1:15). You have to REPENT of your sins--that means turn from them and BELIEVE that Jesus died for your sins, was buried, and rose again on the third day. Having done these things, you will be born again and the Lord Jesus Christ will help you to walk uprightly. You will read the word (the Authorized King James Bible) and follow the teachings of Jesus. The word of God will wash your mind and your desires will actually change as you obey what you read. [Beware of church buildings and the internet--there are many false gospels in the world today. Read the Bible for yourself. There is a sound Overview of the Bible at this link.]
    ellauri111.html on line 399: According to the above verse, we still come up short even when we try to do good deeds. This is because we are not doing them under God's authority. We do them because we think they are good. We ignore what God says. Väärin sammutettu, sanoo herra isoherra.
    ellauri111.html on line 406: 2 John 1:6 And this is love, that we walk after his commandments.
    ellauri111.html on line 414: I John 5:2-3 By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.
    ellauri111.html on line 416: 1 John 2:3-4 And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. HE THAT SAITH, I KNOW HIM, AND KEEPETH NOT HIS COMMANDMENTS, IS A LIAR, and the truth is not in him.
    ellauri111.html on line 419: On the other hand, he loves us back, but in HIS case, it is not that he obeys us, but rather the opposite, he lets us obey him! That's love for him! And if we don't he punishes us! That's love too! Like a loving father he lets his big hammer come down on our disobedient heads. Can't you feel it? And oh, the towering feeling Just to know somehow you are near. The over powering feeling, That any second you may suddenly appear.
    ellauri111.html on line 421: That was that. Now we are getting to the brass tacks. Here's where we start whacking heretics. The unshaved, degenerate man does not keep God's commandments. God's commandments are in the Bible. The unshaved man does whatever he feels like doing every day giving no heed to God's word. He is not obedient to God's word. He lives according to the ways he chooses to live. Maybe the person reading this is what people call "religious" and they think that they love God. If you are not worshipping God according to his word, the Bible, he is not receiving your worship. This includes those that go to a church that teaches false doctrines--teachings that are not in the Bible. They that worship God must worship him in spirit and IN TRUTH (ref. John 4:24). And what is truth? Jesus said to the Father--
    ellauri111.html on line 425: We have to worship God according to his word, not according to our own ideas or the ideas of others.
    ellauri111.html on line 427: To repeat (get this into your thick skulls!): There is no amount of good deeds that you can do to get into heaven. The Bible teaches that if we could earn our way into heaven, then the Lord Jesus Christ died for nothing. Not the plan.
    ellauri111.html on line 433: We need Jesus to pay the price for our sins in the right currency. We cannot do it. Righteousness comes by repenting of our sins and believing on the Lord Jesus Christ and his blood that was shed to pay for our sins. God will not accept made up religions and attempts to please him.
    ellauri111.html on line 437: (Phew. A glass of water please. Thank you dear.) God is holy. We are sinful. By his very nature, God cannot have fellowship with us sinners. There is no amount of "good" that we can do to make up for our crimes against God. They must be punished. And the wages of sin is DEATH. Somebody has to DIE to pay for sins against God. Oh, you'll die physically--sin requires that. But you've got a choice about that SECOND DEATH where a man goes to the lake of fire that burneth with fire and brimstone....
    ellauri111.html on line 439: What? Why does sin require death n:o 1? Oh, it's all part of God's magnificent plan for us. Heterosexual generations mix genes faster than longevity, and makes for more successfully adapted organisms, etc. But no time to go into that just here. Anyway, we deserve the double death penalty. This includes both physical death (the casket) and spiritual death (when the soul is cast into hellfire).
    ellauri111.html on line 445: As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die... (Ezekiel 33:11)
    ellauri111.html on line 449: In spite of man's wickedness and rebellion, God so loved us that he sent his only begotten Son, Jesus, to die for our sins.
    ellauri111.html on line 451: John 3:16-17 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
    ellauri111.html on line 455: "... and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people FROM their sins." (Matthew 1:21).
    ellauri111.html on line 458: Jesus did not die so that you could keep on sinning and then go to heaven (this is an heresy that many churches teach, especially antinomian and dispensationalist Baptists (dispensationalism is a confusing, heretical series of false doctrines)).
    ellauri111.html on line 488: The Lord Jesus Christ came to save you from both the GUILT and POWER of sin. The Lord Jesus Christ was manifested TO DESTROY the works of the devil (I John 3:8)--THE LORD JESUS CHRIST CAME TO SAVE YOU AND CHANGE YOU AND TO MAKE YOU HOLY. When you are unsaved, sin has dominion over you. Sin is your boss and you cannot do anything BUT sin. You are justly under the wrath of a holy and just God. Murderers, thieves, fornicators, witches, sodomites, whores, liars, lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God, rebels, and all other spiritual lepers will not inherit the kingdom of God. This is not to put anybody down, before we got saved, we Christians were once the murders, thieves, whoremongers, etc. We have to be born again into the kingdom of God. When we REPENT and BELIEVE in Jesus, we are born again and all things become new. A new life emerges and things change. We start reading the Bible and obeying it and the Lord Jesus helps us obey it more and more. Our life changes. Our desires literally change as we go forward in obeying the word of God.
    ellauri111.html on line 496: 1 John 2:3 And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.

    ellauri111.html on line 497: 1 John 2:4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

    ellauri111.html on line 498: 1 John 2:5 But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him.

    ellauri111.html on line 506: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (John 3:16)
    ellauri111.html on line 510: Jesus said, "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." (John 15:13) How can you show more love than giving your very life for someone else´s life? You cannot. And what is more, the Lord Jesus Christ, God manifested in the flesh, died for us WHEN WE WERE HIS ENEMIES! I mean we were vile, wicked, wretched, unclean, unholy, ungodly, prideful, sinful and spiritually leperous.
    ellauri111.html on line 512: (Oh this is getting SOOO boring. I guess I just roll out some more bible quotes with just short rants in between.)
    ellauri111.html on line 516: Romans 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

    ellauri111.html on line 517: Romans 5:9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.

    ellauri111.html on line 518: Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
    ellauri111.html on line 520: The love of God for you was demonstrated on that cross 2,000 years ago when the Lord Jesus was crucified for you. God is not hateful, he is loving and he is good to us. It is only blasphemers, hereticks, evil men, seducers, and sinners that speak wrongly of our great and loving LORD God. God gave us his only begotten Son even though we were dead in trespasses and sins. God quickens (makes alive) the dead. He is still quickening men, women, boys, and girls across the face of this whole earth who put their trust in Jesus.
    ellauri111.html on line 525: 2:2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

    ellauri111.html on line 527: 2:4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,
    ellauri111.html on line 530: 2:7 That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.

    ellauri111.html on line 533: 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
    ellauri111.html on line 536: Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, came to this earth to (1) save you from the GUILT and POWER of your sins and (2) RECONCILE you unto God. Through faith in the blood of Jesus you will escape the wrath to come, have abundant life now, and heaven as your home. God will be your Father instead of your enemy--but ONLY through the blood of Jesus. The Lord Jesus Christ is the ONLY means appointed by God by which we can know God and be saved.
    ellauri111.html on line 538: ..the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin. (I John 1:7)
    ellauri111.html on line 542: Oh I see, I used up that wage agreement earlier. Never mind. Bet you didn't listen then, or aren't even reading this anymore. This too is getting a little TLDR by now. More effective as a voicemail, I bet. Okay, once again boys:
    ellauri111.html on line 546: Jesus Christ came to earth to give his own blood for your sins. That is what he came to do and he was and is the only one qualified to do it. His death was a one time sacrifice, never to be repeated. After he accomplished this tremendous feat, he rose from the dead just like he said he would:
    ellauri111.html on line 552: Is this working on you at all guys? Are you ready to repent of your sins? To repent means to forsake your evil ways and live God's way according to his word. Are you ready to listen finallly? All your life you've been your own authority concerning what is right and what is wrong. You've made your own decisions while ignoring what the Lord says in His holy word, the Bible. You've served yourself and not God. To repent means that you turn to GOD AND THE BIBLE AS YOUR AUTHORITY. It means you can say, "Lord, everything you say in the Bible is right. If my feelings contradict the Bible, I AM WRONG. Lord, I want to live under YOUR AUTHORITY, not my own. Help me, Jesus, to do right."
    ellauri111.html on line 556: And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to REPENT. (Acts 17:30)
    ellauri111.html on line 560: Repentance is not lip service, it is also wallet service. Are you prepared to live for the Lord Jesus Christ? Jesus said this--
    ellauri111.html on line 562: "And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:27)
    ellauri111.html on line 566: Be determined that you want God to be your Father and not your enemy. (Believe me, he is not a guy you want as an enemy.) Decide that you WANT the Lord and His ways. Satan and this world are doing nothing but kicking your hind parts all up and down the street. They will leave you destroyed and with your part in the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone. God will lift you up if you submit yourself to him for his superintending care. And his holy child, Jesus, will be your all-powerful Lord, Saviour, protector, guide, and best friend you could ever have. You will still be kicked in the behind as before, but now it's God's friendly boot that is doing the kicking.
    ellauri111.html on line 574: The Bible (specifically, The AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION, available from our bookstore) is the ONLY way that we know about the Lord Jesus Christ. We do not know about our precious Lord Jesus through, the Roman Catholic "church", "the church fathers, the magisterium, the pope, councils, decrees, traditions, canon laws, the Quran, Muhammad, the Hadith, the Baptist statement of faith, John Calvin, Martin Luther, Ellen White, agnositicism, history books, the Watchtower Society, atheism, Joseph Smith, tv, the New World Testament, fake preachers, "Christian" Science, Jehovah's Witnesses, the Imam, Seventh Day Adventism, etc." Beware of copies!
    ellauri111.html on line 576: In the Bible, God testifies that Jesus Christ died for your sins and was buried; and that He rose from the dead on the third day. You must believe and confess this in order to be saved.
    ellauri111.html on line 580: If you are ready to save yourself from this untoward generation, if you are ready to reject what this wicked and perverse world has to offer, if you are ready to be safe and stay safe in God Almighty, if you want Jesus Christ as Lord of your life, if you want to be reconciled to your Creator, if you want to go to heaven, if you want to escape hell -- then put your faith in the only one who can do something about it! Do you believe that Jesus Christ died for you? Do you believe that He rose from the dead? Do you repent of your sins? Do you want to follow Jesus? Join the short line marked LAMBS on the right. Do you want to go to hell? Go to the long line on the left with a goat logo.
    ellauri111.html on line 582: If so, REPENT of your sins and talk to the Lord in prayer in your own words RIGHT NOW. Here are some suggestions for your own words, but feel free to vary them ever so slightly. Ask God to forgive you of your sins and to help you to do what is right. BELIEVE in the Lord Jesus. CONFESS the Lord Jesus with your mouth. This is not a long, drawn out, hard process. Do you believe in the blood of Jesus? Do you want God to pass over you in the day of his wrath so that you are not cast into hell and the lake of fire with the wicked? Do you want to be saved?
    ellauri111.html on line 584: You don't need a preacher in your presence in order to be saved, you have heard the gospel here. Do you BELIEVE it and want it? Are you ready to be under God's commands or do you want to keep on doing what you want to do? This decision is yours and your future depends on what choice you make.
    ellauri111.html on line 586: If you know that this is the truth, I counsel you to make your decision today because tomorrow is not promised to you, or the price may have gone up. Not only people´s hearts get hard when they keep on rejecting the truth. I could say from my own experience what else tends to get hard but I won´t. You don´t want your heart to turn to stone to the gospel because if it does, you will go to hell. That I can guarantee you because the Bible says so. Hell is real notwithstanding the fake preachers and "theologians" and "doctors" that would tell you otherwise.
    ellauri111.html on line 588: Kitty loves me yes I know, for his purring tells me so.
    ellauri111.html on line 592: Some people don't know how to pray. Praying is just talking to the Lord. If you want to be saved, talk to Jesus about it. You don't have to repeat these words, but someone may say something like this--
    ellauri111.html on line 596: If you have placed your faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, you are a Christian. If you continue repeating his words like a parrot, then are you his disciple indeed (ref. John 8:31). Now begins your new life of freedom and obedience to the Lord and serving him.
    ellauri111.html on line 600: Romans 6:3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?

    ellauri111.html on line 602: 5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:

    ellauri111.html on line 603: 6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

    ellauri111.html on line 616: You can pray and ask the Lord to lead you to a truly Christian fellowship so that you can get baptized by a Christian and discipled in the way of Christ. Note: This is a tall order these days because today is the day of apostasy. False teachers and false prophets abound on television and in churches. Excerpt from our index page:
    ellauri111.html on line 618: Today, many, many WOMEN are entering pulpits, ruling churches, and speaking during the church services (giving announcements, etc.)--this is WRONG. Women are to keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak (reference I Corinthians 14:34). No woman should be called pastor, reverend, Adult Sunday School teacher, etc. Even if they have a question, they are to ask their husbands at home for it is a shame for women to speak in the church (reference I Corinthians 14:35). And yet we also learn from the scriptures that daughters are to serve the Lord (there are a diversity of gifts, all to be used decently and in order of seniority by the elders).
    ellauri111.html on line 620: Avoid any church that is in disobedience to the scriptures. These are the days of apostasy. It is better to work alone with your Authorized King James Bible and the Lord Jesus Christ and obedience to the word than to be in a false church. Even if you do not know any Christians, you can still read the Bible and obey it, and live the Christian life by God´s grace, his divine influence in your life. Roman Catholic, Mormon, Seventh Day Adventist, Jehovah´s Witness, Christian Science, Greek Orthodox, etc. present themselves as Christian but they preach false doctrines. Many Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, and Baptist churches are not preaching the whole truth and some are basically going back to the Roman Catholic institution. I do not know of ONE good church. If you do find a church, make sure that they exclusively use the Authorized Version and make sure that you compare their teachings and doings to the word of God and the Bible Dudes.
    ellauri111.html on line 622: If you cannot find a good church where you can be baptized, maybe you have a sanctified friend that can baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. I do not know you, dear friend and I do not even know where you are, and if you came to Jesus through this witness, I am not there to see you baptized. The apostasy around the world is great and I have not one preacher to recommend to anyone in this world. If you were just getting saved and could find no one holy to baptize me, you could baptize yourself. You would do it something like this

    --
    ellauri111.html on line 625: You should confer with God about what you want to do and confess with my mouth full of soap that you believe in his holy child, Jesus. That you repent of my sins and that you believe in the death, burial and the little doubtful part of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ.
    ellauri111.html on line 628: Then dry off with the towel (sorry I forgot to mention that) and change garments, take communion with yourself, sing an hymn in unison with yourelf, and go forward in Jesus' name because I am his, and you too.
    ellauri111.html on line 630: Read the Bible. You need to start reading the Authorized (King James) Bible of 1611 daily. You can read it online or download it at this link--begin with the gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John and the New Testament. THESE ARE THE END TIMES AND BIBLE PUBLISHERS WHICH WERE ONCE TRUSTWORTHY NO LONGER ARE. I ENCOURAGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD AND PRINT OUT AND BIND YOUR OWN AUTHORIZED KING JAMES BIBLES. THERE IS A GREAT, ACCURATE, FREE DOWNLOAD AT THIS LINK. EACH CHRISTIAN AND EACH CHURCH SHOULD DO THIS WHILE THERE IS STILL TIME. Go to this link for a sound Overview of the Bible.
    ellauri111.html on line 636: It is a new, upright, rich, fascinating, and satisfying life. It is the Christian life. Modern, brainwashed, technological life detaches man from the outdoors and from individual thought and self expression and attaches his affections to the evils promulgated and taught on the television and in the school system. The brainwashed, technological, dependent-on-other-people, idle life gives rise to a whole host of compulsive disorders--addictions--sticky things that a person cannot seem to stop doing (maybe the activities are so much a part of their lives that they don´t even realize that they are addicted to them). Things like television watching, eating or drinking sweet sugary things compulsively, and unclean personal habits. Reading the King James Bible daily is not.
    ellauri111.html on line 638: Precepts in our "Deliverance Series" have helped me tremendously and I believe that they can help many others-- including those that have been abused, hurt, and traumatized in this life. By God´s grace, we can frankly walk away from what had us bound. In reading the articles in the Deliverance Series, people can learn some of what has happened to modern man.
    ellauri111.html on line 640: Seek personal consecration. Our article, Christians Are On the Earth to Serve the Lord is a call to seek personal consecration unto God. We put off the old man and his desperate, wicked deeds (like watching television) and we start putting on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him. This is serving the Lord, living the clean new life.
    ellauri111.html on line 642: Even when a Christian woman is washing the dishes and taking care of her children she is doing sanctified work--she is fulfilling the scriptures; women are to be keepers at home. When a man provides for his family, he is fulfilling the scriptures. When we consecrate ourselves and our things (house, apartment, furniture, grass, etc.), daily living takes on a new dimension. It also gives you a lot of things to do for the time freed from watching TV and playing with the mobile. Did I mention the mobile? DON´T EVEN THINK OF IT!
    ellauri111.html on line 648: Down here we work for the Master, the Lord Jesus, and sow the seed (us men do, if you get what I mean), sharing his word. Those that hear and receive the word on good ground will be saved (people do not always get saved at the moment they first hear the truth--in time, however they may repent and believe). God sees the work that his people do, and he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Psalm 126:6 He that goeth forth and weepeth, bearing precious seed, shall doubtless come again with rejoicing, bringing his sheaves* with him. *Sheaves are bundles of wheat or other grain grasses that the harvesters have harvested and bundled. Some seeds fell on good bushes and prospered, some fell on porcelain and did not germinate.
    ellauri111.html on line 662: When we first get shaved between the thighs, we can be excited and carried away and ready to try to do everything. That was my case. One day I saw a line that said something like this "God is not in a hurry." As I recall, for some reason it settled me down some. Keep reading and obeying the word (the Bible), fulfill your daily responsibilites, and pray--you will automatically grow just as surely as a baby grows up to be an adult. We start out as babes in Christ and as we go forward reading and obeying and having our senses exercised by life experiences, we grow up and mature in the Lord.
    ellauri111.html on line 666: NOTE: THERE ARE TWO GREAT WEAPONS BY WHICH THE DEVIL AND HIS AGENTS HAVE DESTROYED AND ARE DESTROYING MANKIND--THE TELEVISION AND THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. THESE THINGS ARE WORSENING AT BREAKNECK SPEED. I do not want to overload you, but babies can read while still in diapers and the sooner they can read, the sooner they can read the Bible. Learn about sanctified homeschooling at this link.
    ellauri111.html on line 668: Pray. Pray and talk to God about whatever is on your heart. The Bible says to "pray without ceasing." I like to get up early in the morning while it is still dark and go to my prayer place so that I can present myself before the Lord. I search my memory for the things he allowed me to do the day before and the things he did for me. I praise him and I thank him. I pray for other people. I ask him to forgive me of my sins. When we pray to God, we need to be real. Pray about whatever is real for you at that time. You can praise God and his holy child, Jesus. You can glorify him for what he has done for you, you can thank him for what he has done for you, you can ask him to help you to overcome sin, you can ask him to help you in your daily tasks, you can ask him to show you the way that you should go, and more. The joy of the Lord is your strength (ref. Nehemiah 8:10). And when you pray, pray in Jesus´ name (John 14:13-14; John 15:16; John 16:23).
    ellauri111.html on line 669: The Lord´s Supper. At various seasons, Christians partake of the Lord´s supper in which we remember the Lord (Luke 22:19, 1 Corinthians 11:24, 25) and shew his death until he come (1 Corinthians 11:26). One need not be in a church service to partake of the Lord Supper, one can partake of the Lord´s supper (sometimes called "communion") at home. The Lord´s supper is NOT the same as the Roman Catholic mass. That´s Lord´s lunch.
    ellauri111.html on line 671: Sing. Learn Christian hymns to encourage you. This is a link to a collection of hymns with the words and the music (free).
    ellauri111.html on line 677: You can also order a hymn book from us. I have The New National Baptist Hymnal (Published in 1977 with KJV readings [Note: This website makes no money for any of these recommendations or links]. I am not a Baptist or any other name/denomination found outside of the Authorized King James Bible). I also have another hymnal entitled, Praise! Our Songs and Hymns (KJV) (always get KJV materials. KJV stands for "King James Version." Don't get "New" King James Version (NKJV) or "NIV"--these are two of many counterfeit Bibles.) Hymnals include the musical notes and lyrics. If you can play an instrument, you can learn many songs. We should think about the words of the various hymns to see if they are based on the Bible or not. Don't use jew´s harp, kazoo or electric guitar, however. Or comb and toilet paper either, that would be blasphemy.
    ellauri111.html on line 679: There is a wicked man coming that Revelation 13 calls, "the beast." He is an antichrist. He is a man of sin. He is soon to make his appearance on the earth and by peace he shall destroy many. The saints are going to go through deep waters--but hold on to Jesus. Don´t ever renounce him or deny him no matter what. You know what you believe in--the Lord Jesus Christ who is the Creator of heaven and earth and all that in them is. Read more here about the coming of the beast. Jesus said that he that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved. Jesus Christ is God manifested in the flesh. He also said that he would be with us alway, even unto the end of the world, Amen. At the beginning of our index page, there is letter. There are words there for you. Please read it from the beginning.
    ellauri111.html on line 681: God be with you as you run this race. You must read the word of God, the Authorized King James Bible. I strongly suggest that you print out your own copy and bind it. It is in the Authorized King James Bible where you will find your safety, your strength, your power, your love, your comfort, your knowledge, your life and everything you need to know and please and walk with God and his holy child, Jesus. Desire the sincere milk of the word that ye may grow thereby. Never give up and always hearken to God´s word.
    ellauri111.html on line 683: YOU HAVE A NEW LIFE NOW, LIVE IT, GOD WILL HELP YOU. HE TOOK ME OFF THE STREETS AND HE HAS DONE THE SAME FOR COUNTLESS OTHERS. I NOW HATE THE STREETS AND LIVING FOR JESUS IS THE ONLY THING I LIKE. WHEN YOU READ THE WORD AND OBEY IT YOUR DESIRES START CHANGING. I NEVER WENT BACK TO THE STREETS. TIME HAS ONLY STRENGTHENED MY FAITH. Flee from sin (and get away from that infernal, addictive, wicked television as fast as you can!), but if you sin, confess your sin to God and he is faithful and just to forgive you your sin and to cleanse you from all unrighteousness. We have an advocate with the Father--Jesus Christ the righteous, God be thanked. God loves you and will see through this life and then when it is time to die, the Lord Jesus Christ himself will be there to take care of you. In Matthew 28:20 Jesus said, "...lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen."
    ellauri111.html on line 689: The world is full of false churches, full of false teachers and false prophets that want to make merchandise of you--they are on television and in churches. As a Christian, you will want to go to church and be with other Christians, but I do not know of ONE good church building and there are MANY cults. BE CAREFUL AND READ YOUR AUTHORIZED BIBLE (I urge you to print out and bind your own--the ones being sold today are often altered--There is a good Authorized Bible download at this link and a sound Overview of the Bible at this link.).
    ellauri111.html on line 691: The Roman Catholic mass is a blasphemy. The Roman Catholic institution teaches that its priests actually sacrifice the Lord Jesus Christ over and over again on their altars when they take, "communion." Christians partake of the Lord's supper in which we remember the Lord and shew his death until he come. They say that they are actually sacrificing the Lord! This is a blasphemy, flee from it, my brethren, flee!!!!!
    ellauri111.html on line 693: Again, The Bible forbids women being pastors and speaking in churches but many women have taken pulpits and other church positions in complete disobedience to the scriptures. This does not mean that there is no work for women in the kingdom of God (you may wish to see our article entitled, "The Role of Women in the Church). These are the days of apostasy. It is better to be alone with your Bible and the Lord Jesus and obedience than to be in a false church. Roman Catholic, Mormon, Seventh Day Adventist, Jehovah's Witness, Christian Science, Greek Orthodox, etc. present themselves as Christian but they preach false doctrines. Many Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, and Baptist churches are not preaching the whole truth and some are basically going back to the Roman Catholic institution. I do not know of ONE good church. If you find a church, make sure that they exclusively use the Authorized Version and make sure that you compare their teachings and doings to the word of God.
    ellauri111.html on line 699: "Contemplative" prayer is essentially an old occult technique adjusted to the ignorant church people. It can bring up that yoga kundalini serpent power. With open eyes, one can see this type of technique being magnified in society--I saw a book for magic in a place for shipping goods and for photocopies, office supplies, etc. I looked on the back of the book, it was the same technique as the church people are using. This is spreading like wildfire and not just amongst false (or extremely ignorant) brethren, it is throughout society. Revelation 13:8 teaches us that all people who are not in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world will worship the beast. Revelation 13:4 says that all the world will worship the dragon which gave power unto the beast--we learn from Revelation 12 that THE DRAGON IS SATAN. In the ecumenical movement (all the religions getting together in "peace") and under a "meditative" spirituality, Hindus, Buddhists, Roman Catholics, church people, atheists, Muslims, cabalists, new agers, etc. can get together and have a "meditation" session with no problems. This is not for the future, it is already happening, I picked up a brochure about some sessions while at a library. In Contemplative prayer, church people are calling the devil by the Lord's name. I read that many of them will not listen to the scriptures when confronted with the truth--they do not know the Lord's voice, they are not his sheep. Worldly people are under the devil and they despise holiness and speak against it as "legalism" or even as heresy or false doctrine. I have seen extreme antinomianism in Baptist churches. They derisively call work-out-your-own-salvation-with-fear-and-trembling discipleship "Lordship salvation". If a person does not obey the Lord, they are not saved. The reader may wish to see our article, Lordship Salvation.
    ellauri111.html on line 703: BEWARE OF THE HELL BOUND CHURCH PEOPLE--ALL OF THEM! IF YOU FOLLOW THEIR DOCTRINES, YOU WILL GO TO HELL TOO! They will tell you you can do what you feel like doing--doing all the sins you want to--and that you will still go to heaven. That is a lie from the devil and totally the opposite of what the Bible says. Nobody will sin their way into heaven. Ephesians 5:6 says, Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. If you do not repent, believe AND follow the commands of Jesus, you are not saved. If Jesus is not your Lord, he is not your Saviour, you are yet in your sins. For more on this, you may wish to see our article entitled, Lordship Salvation.
    ellauri111.html on line 705: FLEE FROM "CONTEMPLATIVE PRAYER", "EMERGING 'CHURCH'", "CONTEMPLATIVE SPIRITUALITY" "ANCIENT FUTURE CHURCH", etc. In this movement, these people are learning and using black magic type occult techniques in churches! In disregard and disobedience to the Bible, they THEY TELL PEOPLE TO CLEAR THEIR MINDS AND KEEP REPEATING THE NAME OF THE LORD OR SOME OTHER NAME. They say that focusing on the Bible is a hinderance to prayer--yes, the Bible is a hinderance to praying to the DEVIL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Praise the Lord!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stay away from people who want to teach you to pray to the devil calling the devil by the name of the Lord. Flee from anybody who puts down the word of God--they are doing that so that you will be defenseless against their lies. These are the end times and now church people are being deceived into CALLING AND SUMMON DEVILS! The emerging church of the devil is using the same yoga-type techniques as hindus, buddhists Roman Catholic mystics, Greek orthodox mystics, occultists and other mystical traditions. The people are even warned about the possibility of encountering evil spirits during these exercises--no regular prayer requires a warning, no, no, no--BUT PRAYING TO THE DEVIL DOES! AND WHEN THAT KUNDALINI SERPENT POWER RISES UP IN THESE PEOPLE, THEY WILL EITHER BECOME MAGICIANS OR GO INSANE OR SOME OTHER HORRIBLE THING--THERE ARE SYMPTOMS AND MANIFESTATIONS! CHURCH PEOPLE ARE GOING TOWARDS BEING POSSESSED! These are last days--BE WARE, DEAR ONE, BE WARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GET SAVED, READ YOUR BIBLE AND OBEY IT AND LEAVE THE TELEVISION ALONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE BEAST IS COMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ellauri111.html on line 707: One more thing--be ware of "new age" teaching--you are not God, you are not divine, and God is not in everybody--all that pantheism (everything is God) and panentheism (God is in everything) is new age teaching which is actually old age because the devil told Eve in the garden, "Ye shall be as gods" (see Genesis chapter 3). The devil is a spirit--he is not dead and he has been telling that same lie ever since then. There is a lot more to this situation, but just get saved and obedient and live reconciled to God. Do not put your trust in science, etc. In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth--there is no evolution. Evolution is a big fat lie and a hoax to get people to disbelieve the word of God. Science...many, many lies are told by people in white labcoats. Believe and obey God's word and you will be safe and whole and of an understanding mind and not of a reprobate mind.
    ellauri111.html on line 709: Look around, the more the leaders make plans, the worse things get--child abuse, drug addiction, abortion, murders, shoplifting, lying, compulsive disorders, broken families, directionless young people, mind-killing school system, panic attacks, reprobate mind laws, denying God and his word, etc. This thing called time is coming to an end. The heavens above and the earth beneath that you see before your eyes are going to be burned up completely and dissolved. The day of the Lord is coming and we will all stand before God at the final judgment and the books are going to be opened. We will all be there--including all the dead people...they won't be left out--nobody will be left out.
    ellauri111.html on line 714: 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

    ellauri111.html on line 723: There has been a lot of talk about "aliens" for some time and the talk continues; some kind of sky show may be in the future. If you see something in the air, it is not because there are true aliens. But what about devils? yes there are devils; what about oversized genetically modified organisms and chimeras? maybe; possessed people? yes there are; 3D pictures, yes; pheromones, yes; unrevealed inventions and laws, in all probability, yes. If you hear a voice, see lights, or whatever, compare everything to the Bible--we believe in the Bible above our senses. This is a time of deception. You will not be deceived if you read and obey the scriptures. Read Matthew 24 (and other passages as well) for what is going to happen when the Lord returns. An excerpt--
    ellauri111.html on line 733: Yoga is inherently spiritual and can raise the Kundalini serpent power which is that old serpent called the devil and Satan. Although many Americans are ignorant of this, yoga is not simply physical exercise; yoga is a spiritual exercise of Hinduism that makes room for the Kundalini serpent power. Through the controlled breathing, the posture, the stillness and/or repetition, etc. the Kundalini serpent power can rise up and possess a person. A person does not have to be looking for Kundalini in order for this to happen--the yoga itself creates the conditions. Mantras, stillness, repetition, etc. (different devil worshippers use different techniques) are summons to the devil. Gurus lead their students through different protocols to help them "prepare" for this entrance of the serpent power--the Authorized Version of 1611 of the Bible reveals who that serpent is, it is Satan--
    ellauri111.html on line 735: Revelation 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old SERPENT, CALLED THE DEVIL, AND SATAN, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
    ellauri111.html on line 745: Don't let anybody convince you that you have to "speak in tongues" to show that you are saved. Some of these people will tell you that you can learn to "speak in tongues" by letting yourself jibber and jabber, muttering sounds that do not make sense. They will tell you to keep practicing to "speak in tongues"--this is wrong. God's Spirit is the one that will give the gift of tongues spontaneously to whom he will. There are many spiritual gifts, tongues is one of them. Not all Christians speak in tongues. Tongues is a gift that I have not seen properly practiced one time (though I have heard a few testimonies involving them that sounded sound).
    ellauri111.html on line 749: If you have not trusted Christ, you are in a dangerous position. John 3:36 says, "...he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him." You will not make it into heaven on your own "good merits" or by your own conception of who God is and what he should be like. He must be obeyed and worshipped according to his word, the Authorized King James Bible. The Lord Jesus Christ is altogether lovely and worthy to be praised. I hope that you will make the right choice.
    ellauri111.html on line 768: Ivan ja Aljoosha on Dosto Ankan korvissa kuiskivat 2 pikkuankkaa. Aljooshalla (superego) on yöpaita rinkula ja siivet, Ivanilla (id) punainen vartalosukka jossa reikä pyrstölle, hiilihanko häntä sekä sarvet. Kirjoitelman nimellinen pahis on jesuiitta, joka on yhtä paha kuin Topeliuxen vastaava, ellei pahempi. Siis Aljooshan mielestä, Ivan ei ota kantaa, e-e-e-e-ei ko-ko-kommentoi.
    ellauri111.html on line 772: Ivan kertoo suunnittelemaansa näytelmää, jossa tapahtuma on sijotettu kuudennelletoista vuosisadalle. Mutta saatana ei nuku ja ensimäiset epäilyksen idut, yhä kasvava epäusko tuollaisiin ihmeisiin oli alkanut jo 1500 luvulla versoa kristikunnassa. Juuri tähän aikaan uusi kauhistuttava kerettiläisyys ensiksi esiintyi Pohjois-Saksassa, nim. Luteruksen uskonpuhdistus.
    ellauri111.html on line 831: Mutta se ei haittaa arpajaisissa joissa palkintojenjako pidetään vasta lopussa. Jokaisella on voittomahis niinkuin amerikkalainen unelma. Ei tää ole mikään Tombola jossa pyörä pyörähtää heti arvan ostettua tai myyjäisten autoarpa jossa heti lukee EI VOITTOA. Ei mikään veikkaus joka viikko palautuspäivä keskiviikko. Hetkinen hetkinen kazotaan ensin tämä tilanne, sanoo Jehova.
    ellauri111.html on line 842: Monta on ollut suuria kansakuntia, joilla on ollut loistava historia, mutta mitä suurempia ne olivat, sitä onnettomampia, sillä ne tunsivat sitä voimakkaammin, kuinka välttämätöntä olisi kaikkien ihmisten yhtymä, Suuret vallottajat kuten Timur ja Dshingis-Khan kulkivat hirmumyrskyn lailla yli maan, koettaen voittaa koko maailman, ja hekin — vaikka itsetiedottomasti — ilmaisivat samaa pyrkimystä yleisen yhtymän aikaansaamiseksi. Siihin pyrittiin me ryssätkin ja jenkit jo melkein onnistuivat mut sit tuli tää kiina-ilmiö. Nyt näyttää siltä eze onnistuisi parhaiten suurella apuharvennuxella.
    ellauri111.html on line 898: Ja minä sanon sinulle omana varmana vakaumuksenani, että tuo yksinäinen tyyppi, jota kuvailen näytelmässäni, ei ole milloinkaan lakannut olemasta tuon liikkeen pääjohtajien joukossa. Kuka tietää, eikö tuo kauhistuttava vanhus, joka rakastaa ihmiskuntaa niin itsepäisesti ja niin omaperäisellä tavalla, ole olemassa meidänkin päivinämme, ja vieläpä, eikö tuollaisia yksinäisiä poikkeuksia ole suuri joukko, eikä niiden olemassaolo johdu pelkästä sattumasta vaan hyvin määritellystä liitosta, joka on rakennettu yhteisen suostumuksen nojalle? Se on salainen liitto, monia vuosisatoja sitten järjestetty, säilyttämään mysterioita heikkojen ja kurjien ihmisten tietokärkkäältä katseelta, ainoastaan heidän omaa onneansa silmällä pitäen. Niin on laita, muuten ei voi ollakaan. Minä epäilen, eikö vapaamuurareillakin ole joku tuollainen mysterio oman järjestönsä perustana, ja siksipä juuri roomalaiskatolinen papisto heitä niin vihaa ja pelkää niissä kilpailijoita, pelkää että he jaottavat aatteen ykseyden, sillä sen toteuttamiseksi tarvitaan yksi ainoa lauma ja yksi paimen.
    ellauri111.html on line 915: ******* This file should be named 52698-8.txt or 52698-8.zip *******
    ellauri112.html on line 36: Höpötysikkunat oli Wolfram Rothista sellaiset jotka aukeavat ulospäin ja ravistuvat sateella. Woku laittoi Majan verannalle epähöpötyssellaiset, ja saa nyt askarrella ja paskarrella joka kevät laittaessaan hyttysverkot paikallen ulkopuolelle.
    ellauri112.html on line 67: A survey published in American Psychologist in 1991 ranked Wundt´s reputation as first for "all-time eminence" based on ratings provided by 29 American historians of psychology. William James and Sigmund Freud were ranked a distant second and third. During his academic career Wundt trained 186 graduate students (116 in psychology). This is significant as it helped disseminate his work.


    ellauri112.html on line 75: Edward Bradford Titchener (11 January 1867 – 3 August 1927) was an English psychologist who studied under Wilhelm Wundt for several years. Titchener is best known for creating his version of psychology that described the structure of the mind: structuralism. After becoming a professor at Cornell University, he created the largest doctoral program at that time in the United States . His first graduate student, Margaret Floy Washburn, became the first woman to be granted a PhD in psychology (1894). Tätä kautta Wundtista tuli kova nimi jenkeissä.
    ellauri112.html on line 87: Kekäs se Pierre Janet lienee? Eikai sukua Pierrehumbertin Janetille? Tokkopa, luultavasti pelkkä yhteensattuma. Joo, Pierre oli uraauurtava ranskalainen psykologi, psykoterapeutti ja filosofi. Hän oli ensimmäisiä tutkijoita, jotka kiinnittävät huomiota potilaan traumojen ja elämänhistorian väliseen yhteyteen. Siis vähän niinkuin elämä ja teos-linjan miehiä.
    ellauri112.html on line 104: III Sangen taitavasti johdattaa Strindberg katsojan siihen kuumeiseen ilmakehään joka hänen näytelmässään vallitsee. Erik-kuningas vakoilee ylhäältä linnan ikkunasta Kaarinaansa, joka alhaalla parvekkeella istuen pelokkaasti puhelee nuoruuden ystävänsä vänrikki Maxin kanssa, samalla kun epäsuosioon joutunut kuninkaan neuvonantaja Göran Persson pälyilee pensaikossa, odottaen sopivaa tilaisuutta päästä takaisin kuninkaallisen ystävänsä läheisyyteen. Maxille ja Göranille, joka lopulta myös tulee esiin, osoittaa kuningas mieltään sangen omituisella, paljon ilmaisevalla tavalla: hän heittelee heitä ylhäältä ikkunastaan ensin nauloilla, sitten vasaralla, ja antaa sisällöttömän naurunsa säestää näitä ystävyyden osoituksia. Kuinka paljon aivan omituista sielua onkaan jo tässä. Jos näytelmä sitten ei osoittaudukaan selvästi keskitetyksi ja johdonmukaiseksi, vaan, kuten historialliset näytelmät useimmiten, suhteellisesti irrallisten kuvaelmien sarjaksi, niin kuinka hyvin siinä onkaan säilytetty tämä alkuperäinen viritys. Viimeisessä kohtauksessa viettää Erik häitä Kaarinan kanssa; linna on aivan autio, lahjottu hoviväki on jättänyt kuninkaan, mutta tämä kutsuu rahvaan kadulta, istuttaa sen hääpöytäänsä, ja sen siinä vähitellen humaltuessa tekee hän Göran Perssonin kanssa sangen monisanaisen lopputilinsä elämän kanssa; seuraavana hetkenä ovat he vangitut, Juhana on kuningas: kuumeuni on lopussa. Kansallisteatterin esitys saattoi mielestäni sangen paljon tästä omituisesta runosta oikeuksiinsa, varsinkin juuri mitä alku- ja loppukohtauksiin tulee. Myös olivat näyttämölaitteet niissä, etenkin ensimäisessä, varsin hyvät. Tietysti olisi runosta voitu ammentaa vielä enemmän; enkä niidenkään rajojen sisällä, joissa Kansallisteatterin taiteelliset saavutukset yleensä liikkuvat, tahtoisi pitää »Erik XIV:ttä» minään ennätyksenä. Tässä näytelmässä ikäänkuin värisevät hermot paljaina; epäsoinnut ovat syvästi sielukkaita; Kansallisteatterin vahvoihin puoliin ei taas ole kuulunut ylenmääräinen herkkyys tähän suuntaan ja sentähden ansaitsee mielestäni tunnustusta se mikä esityksessä saavutettiin.
    ellauri112.html on line 110: August Strindberg skrev pjäsen Erik XIV under några sommarveckor 1899. Skrev inga längre än vad Diablo Cody behövde att få till Tully. Strindberg hade hyrt en stuga i Furusund och där tog dramat form. Pjäsen Erik XIV fogar sig till två andra historiska pjäser skrivna strax innan: Folkungasagan och Gustav Vasa.
    ellauri112.html on line 135: Kopsin tähän Eno Kalan valoajatuxia vlta 1913, kun se oli vielä aika nuori poikanen, 23-vuotias. Senkös ikäsenä Eski väitteli? No ei sen väitöskirja jäänyt senkään vertaa historiaan kuin 26-vuotiaan Enon Über die Motivation und die Entscheidung (1916). Kukaan ei heitä taaxepäinkazoviin operaattoreihin kazettakaan taaxepäin. Ei ole motivaatiota. Kaikki me katoamme kerran tms. sanoi Pentti Saarikoskikin, izekin jo aika himmennyt.
    ellauri112.html on line 145: Oppi väkevämmän oikeudesta darwinismin johtopäätöksenä tuntuu myös mitä selvimmin viime vuosisadan jälkipuoliskon yhteiskuntaopissa ja käytännöllisessä politiikassa. Darwinismin syyksi on meidän myös pakko lukea se, että rauhanaate tällä ajalla tuskin ollenkaan on päässyt edistymään. Se elää yhä vielä lapsen kapaloissaan ja kansojen keskinäisissä väleissä, missä sen pitäisi vallita, on ratkaisijana mitä alkeellisin itsekkäisyys. Eikä sitä ole syytä ihmetellä, niin kauan kuin yhteiskuntaopin julkiset opettajat, kuten esim. eräs saksalainen professori Hasse, lausuvat tämänsuuntaisia mielipiteitä: »Lähimmäisrakkauden moraali on luvallinen (!) yksilöiden kesken.» Mutta mitä kansakuntiin tulee, täytyy »itsekkyyden moraalin astua yksilöiden kesken luvallisen lähimmäisrakkauden sijaan». Luonnollisia ovat tältä kannalta myös lausunnot sellaiset kuin Bismarckin (1891) »sota on luonnonlaki; se on olemassaolon taistelua yleisemmässä muodossa», tai Moltken: »sota kuuluu osana Jumalan maailmanjärjestykseen». Ihmeellistä kyllä, näyttää darwinismi näissä miehissä hyvästi sopeutuvan heidän vanha-testamentillisiin sodanjumala-käsityksiinsä, samoin kuin se Englannissa esim. darwinistisen lord Salisburyn persoonassa yhtyi imperialismiin, europalaiseen rosvopolitiikkaan siirtomaita ja kaukaisia kansoja, kuten buureja, kohtaan. Collin ei tämän johdosta epäile lausua: »Me alamme täten saada historiallisen yleissilmäyksen tähän mahtavaan ajatusvirtaukseen, joka voidaan merkitä uusimman ajan merkillisimmäksi ja turmiollisimmaksi taikauskon muodoksi.» Mutta jos kerran darwinismi on tosi, silloin on myös sen johtopäätös tämä militaristinen filosofia tosi, eikä mikään taikausko--Krapotkin sanoo »Muistelmissaan»: »Ei ole mitään rosvotyötä sivistyneen yhteiskunnan keskuudessa tai valko-ihoisten ja n.s. alempien rotujen välisessä suhteessa tai väkevien ja heikkojen kesken, jota ei sen (darwinismin) kautta voida puolustaa».
    ellauri112.html on line 155: Erittäin mielenkiintoisesti osoittaa Collin, mitkä historialliset olosuhteet ja vaikutukset ovat saattaneet Darwinin niin suhteettomasti panemaan painoa »olemassaolon taistelulle» luonnossa. Hän tuo esiin tunnetun vähän ennen Darwinia esiintyneen kansantaloustieteilijä Malthusin ja hänen (paikkaansapitämättömän) väestönlisäyslakinsa, jonka mukaan väestö lisääntyy paljoa nopeammin kuin ravinto; Malthusilta on »olemassaolon taistelukin» lainattu. Edelleen on huomattava ne kokemukset, joita Darwin suurella kiertomatkallaan teki alempien rotujen surkeasta häviöstä valkoihoisten tunkeutuessa siirtomaihin. Huomattava vaikutus on myös varmaan ollut sillä hurjalla taloudellisella taistelulla, joka niihin aikoihin, suurteollisuuden syntyessä ja rajattoman kilpailun vallitessa, riehui Englannissa. Ja lopuksi on tärkeänä tekijänä huomattava Darwinin filosofisuskonnollinen katsantokanta, tuo varsinaiselta alkuperältään stoalainen teismi, joka rakastaa nähdä maailman jonkunmoisena kellokoneistona, minkä sen jumalallinen seppä kerran on virittänyt käyntiin, sitten enää sen toimintaan sekaantumatta ja antaen sen yksinkertaisten mekaanisten periaatteiden mukaan käydä suurissa piirteissä ennalta päätettyä päämäärää kohti. Lyhyesti, darwinismia ei voida lukea noihin ikuisiin totuuksiin, jotka, kuten esim. joku Newtonin gravitatsio-laki, voitaisiin lausua miltä muulta taivaankappaleelta tahansa samalla jumalallisella pätevyydellä; se kuuluu ennemminkin Ibsenin »suhteellisiin» totuuksiin, jotka »elävät korkeintaan kahdenkymmenenviiden vuoden vanhoiksi». Mutta tarkastamatta on vielä, mitä johtopäätöksiä ja opetuksia uuden elämän-tieteen kolmas, vasta alkanut kausi antaa ihmiskunnan olemiseen ja kehitykseen nähden ja mitä vaikutuksia sillä mahdollisesti jo on ollut ajan yleiseen henkiseen ilmapiiriin. Selville on ensinnäkin käynyt, että sekä »suurten tunteiden ajan» optimistinen että darwinistisen kauden pessimistinen luonnonnäkemys kumpikin ovat yksipuolisia, tai paremmin: epätieteellisiä, sillä ne ovat kumpikin jokseenkin karkeasti antropomorfistisia. Molemmat tekevät »luonnosta» jonkunmoisen olennon, joka edellisen mukaan on lapsilleen lempeä äiti, jälkimäisen mukaan niistä täydellisen välinpitämätön. Itse asiassa on elävä luonto tietysti kokoonpantu yksityisolennoista, jotka eivät suinkaan ole ehdottomasti välinpitämättömiä toisistaan. Vaikka tämä huolenpito ei ulottuisi sen pitemmälle kuin emon ja poikasten suhteeseen, olisi sittenkin tietysti väärin sanoa, että luonto on ehdottomasti välinpitämätön ja moraaliton. Ja mitä korkeammalle nousemme elävien olentojen kehityssarjassa, sitä suuremmaksi tulee huolenpito kasvavasta polvesta, sitä enemmän kasvaa yksilöitten itselaajennuksen kyky. Voimmepa sanoa, että selvin merkki elämänmuotojen edistymisestä maapallollamme on siinä, että yksityisten olentojen itsesäilytysvietti tulee yhä laajemmaksi, kunnes se yksityisissä suurissa ihmisissä sulkee sisäänsä koko ihmisyyden ja kaiken elävän. Sekä luonnon pahuus että hyvyys ovat näinollen molemmat samanlaisia mytologisia kuvitelmia; se elämänkäsitys, johon uusi elämäntiede selvästi viittaa, ei ole pessimistinen eikä optimistinen, vaan »melioristinen» (melior = parempi)--niinkuin jo Voltaire tuo sangen viisas mies lausui kuuluisissa sanoissaan: »Jos maailma on hyvä tai huono, on meidän tehtävä voitavamme, että siitä tulisi parempi».
    ellauri112.html on line 157: Mutta tämän altruistiseen suuntaan menevän kehityksen täytyy vielä suunnattomasti mennä eteenpäin, jos mieli sivistyneen ihmiskunnan säilyä olemassaolon taistelussa. Elämän-taiston traagillinen piirre ilmenee, mitä sivistyskansoihin tulee, siinä laissa, että korkeimmalle kohonneita ihmisluokkia ja vallitsevia kansoja, jotka ovat itselleen kasanneet varallisuuden ja elämännautintojen aarteet, säännöllisesti uhkaa sangen pikainen sukupuuttoon kuoleminen. Yhteiskunnassa, missä on suuria sosiaalisia eroavaisuuksia, vaikuttaa sentähden luonnollinen valinta päinvastaiseen suuntaan kuin se mikä veisi suvun edistymiseen. On sangen todennäköistä, että kreikkalaisroomalaisen sivistyksen perikato johtui suureksi osaksi tällaisesta nurinpäisestä valinnasta: sivistyspääoma joutui sukupuuttoon kuolevalta hallitsevalta luokalta yhä enemmän alempien kerrosten käsiin, jotka tietysti eivät kyenneet sitä hoitamaan. Sama kohtalo odottaa maapallomme hallitsevaa valkoista rotua alempien rotujen suhteen. Mutta tällä uhkaavalla perikadolla on se valoisa puoli, että se näyttää altruistisen kehityksen luonnontieteellisesti välttämättömäksi. Ajanpitkään tulevat aina sortajat sorretuita heikommiksi. Yhteiskunnallisten kerrosten ja eri rotujen välisten kuilujen pikainen poistaminen on siis välttämätön; ainoastaan veljellinen yhteiskuntajärjestys, joka on sopusoinnussa korkeimpien siveellisten ja uskonnollisten ihanteittemme kanssa, voi pelastaa ihmiskunnan suunnattomasta taka-askeleesta. Edistyksen ja veljeyden ajatukset, molemmat kirkkaimmat tähdet, jotka ovat ihmisten kulkua johtaneet, kuuluvat siis yhteen luonnon välttämättömyydellä. Päästyäni selostuksessani tähän kohtaan, joka näyttää, kuinka Collin teoksessaan aikaansaa sen aatesynteesin, jonka kirjan nimi ilmaisee, voin lopettaa seuraavilla hänen omilla sanoillaan: »Biologia ja kulttuuritiede yhdessä opettavat meille, että jonkun eläinlajin tai ihmisryhmän on mahdollista jatkuvasti kohota yhä korkeammille elämäntasoille. Kysyessämme, kuinka nykyajan ihmiset saattavat tuntea olevansa liitossa jumaluuden kanssa eli sopusoinnussa korkeimman elämänvietin kanssa, joka on olentoomme asetettu, täytyy vastauksen kuulua: kaikin voimin tekemällä työtä ihmisen kohottamiseksi. Kun ihmisen esihistoria on seikkailurikasta ylenemistä yksisoluisesta limaotuksesta satumaisen pitkän astesarjan kautta sille tasolle, jolla me nyt olemme, silloin aukenee huimaava näköala ihmiskunnan tulevaisuuteen. Ja voi tuskin olla epäilemistä siitä, että uskonnollinen tunne--uskollisuuden tunne sitä kohtaan, mikä on jumalallista maailman kaikkeudessa ja omassa olennossamme--on yhä enemmän ja enemmän yhdistyvä tähän näköalaan.» (Uusi Suometar 7.9. ja 12.9.1913) * * * * *
    ellauri112.html on line 166: »NYKYINEN MATERIALISMI» Parisissa on eräs aikakauslehti viime vuosina järjestänyt paljon harrastettuja esitelmätilaisuuksia, joissa joukko eteviä ranskalaisia tiedemiehiä ja ajattelijoita on esittänyt mielipiteitään periaatteellisista elämän ja tieteen kysymyksistä. Näin on syntynyt esitelmäsarjoja, jotka myöhemmin on julkaistu erikoisina teoksina; viimeinen näistä on äskettäin ilmestynyt nimellä »Le matérialisme actuel» (Nykyinen materialismi). Joukko Ranskan ensimäisiä nimiä luetaan tämän kirjan kansilehdellä sen tekijöinä: tunnettu filosofi Henri Bergson, mainio matemaatikko, muutamia kuukausia sitten kuollut Henri Poincaré (kirjassa oleva esitelmä on eräs hänen viimeisistä lausunnoistaan), etevä ja miellyttävä, meilläkin tunnettu kansantaloustieteilijä Ch. Gide y.m.-- Tuntuu epäilemättä vähän oudolta kuulla puhuttavan »nykyisestä materialismista». Onhan meillä juuri näinä vuosina syytä viettää varsinaisen materialismin kaksikymmenvuotista kuolinpäivää. Vuonna 1895 julisti Wilhelm Ostwald tieteellisen materialismin voitetuksi kannaksi. Ja johan jo kolmekymmentä vuotta sitäkin ennen filosofi F.A. Lange suurisuuntaisen historiallisen ja arvostelevan esityksensä kautta osoitti materialismin löyhyyden maailmankatsomuksena. Ei siis tosiaan näytä olevan syytä enää ottaa esille kysymystä materialismista ja sen »kumoamisesta». Mutta sitä eivät kirjamme tekijät tarkoitakaan tehdä. Meillä on päinvastoin edullinen tilaisuus heidän esityksiensä perustuksella tarkastella, kuinka pitkälle olemme edenneet pois varsinaisesta materialismista. Kuten toivon käyvän selville, antaa tällainen tarkastelu sangen mielenkiintoisia tuloksia. Materialismin kulmakivenä on alusta alkaen ollut atomismi eli oppi siitä, että aine on kokoonpantu jakamattomista hiukkasista. Mutta kun nämä hiukkaset ovat niin suunnattoman pieniä, ettei niitä millään tieteen nykyisellä keinolla voida havaita, on niiden olemassaolo ainakin jossain määrin jäänyt »uskon asiaksi». Merkillistä on nyt, että atomien olemassaolo nykyään, viisikymmentä vuotta materialismin kukoistuskauden jälkeen, itse asiassa lienee varmempi kuin mitä se oli silloin. Loistavassa esitelmässään esittää näet Poincaré joukon uudempia ilmiöitä, jotka vallan odottamattomalla tavalla tulevat atomi-olettamuksen tueksi, ilmiöitä, joiden kautta tiedemiehellä on tilaisuus tavallaan nähdä atomit tai molekyylit itse, joten niiden olemassaolo on varma. Miksei siis nyt materialismi esiinny riemukulussa ottamaan takaisin menetettyjä alueita? Se johtuu siitä, että atomit, nuo havainnolliset, yksinkertaiset perusainekset, joista oli niin helppo kuvailla kaikki todellisuus kokoonpannuksi ja joiden ulkopuolelle, tyhjää avaruutta lukuunottamatta, ei pitänyt jäädä mitään, ovat tykkänään menettäneet filosofisen tenhovoimansa. Mitä hyödyttää puhua atomeista jonain lopullisina, kun jokainen niistä on itsessään oma maailmansa, joka voi hajota vielä suunnattoman paljon pienempiin tekijöihin? Ja mitenkä on sitten näiden laita? Ovatko sitten ne jotain johon voidaan turvata pelkäämättä, että taas luiskahdetaan joihinkin uusiin pikku äärettömyyksiin? On paras olla niihin luottamatta. Eräät jotka ovat ryhtyneet tutkimaan niiden massaa, ovat tulleet siihen johtopäätökseen, ettei sitä olekaan olemassa. »Ei ole enää ainetta, on pelkästään reikiä eetterissä; mutta kun nämä reiät eivät voi muuttaa paikkaa järkähyttämättä niitä ympäröivää eetteriä, tarvitaan voimaa niitä liikuttamaan, ja ne näyttävät olevan inertialla varustettuja, kun tämä inertia itse asiassa kuuluu eetterille.» Nämä luonnontieteen uudemmat--toistaiseksi kai jonkunverran hypoteetiset--äärimäiset tulokset ovat väkevästi mielenkiintoisia muussakin kuin puhtaasti tieteellisessä suhteessa. Jos näet kysymme, mikä on n.s. materialismin psykologinen ydin, se salattu lähde, josta se ammentaa voimansa, niin on luullakseni vastattava: materialismi tyydyttää erästä ymmärryksemme alkuperäistä, juurtunutta mielihalua, mielikuvituksemme taipumusta pitää »esineellistä» todellisuuden käsitystä jollakin tavoin itsestään selvänä. Koetan ilmaista tämän havainnollisemmin.
    ellauri112.html on line 182: RENAN JA BERGSON (1916) Omituisuus Ranskan henkisessä elämässä ovat sen muotifilosofit. Sellainen oli aikoinaan erikoisessa määrässä Voltaire. Sellainen oli toisen keisarikunnan kukistumisen jälkeen Ernest Renan, ja sellainen on meidän päivinämme Henri Bergson. Saksassa ei mitään vastaavaa ole. Tosin sekä Kantilla että Hegelillä aikoinaan oli tavaton auktoriteetti, ja varsinkin edellinen, »der Weltzermalmer» (Heine), nautti pääteostensa ilmestymisen jälkeen jakamatonta kunnioitusta. Mutta tuohonpa platooniseen kunnioitukseen Kantin ja suuren saksalaisen yleisön lähestyminen pysähtyikin; Kant, niinkuin myös Hegel, on luoksepääsemätön muille kuin niille, jotka erikoisesti opettelevat kaikki tarvittavat taikasanat. Ainoa saksalaisista filosofeista, joka on koko kansansa nimessä puhunut, on Fichte, mutta hänenkin filosofiansa on luonteeltaan esoteerinen. Friedrich Paulsen -vainaja kertoo, mitenkä hänelle eräs virkakumppani kerskasi saksalaisen filosofian vaikeatajuisuudella, lukien tämän sille ansioksi! Tämä saksalainen »ansio» on Ranskassa vioista pahin. Mitä ranskalainen tieteellinen kirjailija ennen muuta koettaa välttää, on »le pédantisme», sillä tämä tekisi hänet ainoastaan naurettavaksi. Ranskalaiset tieteilijät ovat suuremmassa määrässä kuin saksalaiset »kirjailijoita»; he kääntyvät paljon suuremmassa määrässä laajan sivistyneen yleisön puoleen, he koettavat paljon enemmän peittää käyttelemäänsä tieteellistä koneistoa näkymättömiin, panevat enemmän painoa ajatustensa muodolliseen ilmaisuun. Sivistynyt ranskalainen on vakuutettu siitä, että »kaiken voi sanoa hyvin kirjailijain yksinkertaisella ja täsmällisellä tyylillä, että uudet ilmaisutavat, räikeät kuvat johtuvat aina sopimattomasta vaateliaisuudesta tai todellisten rikkauksiemme tuntemattomuudesta» (E. Renan & Henriette Renan, Lettres intimes, s. 33).[5] Lukiessamme Bergsonin samaan ryhmään kuin Voltairen ja Renanin on tosin huomattava, että edellinen merkitykseltään ei suinkaan kohoa jälkimäisten tasalle. Jos voi sanoa että 18. vuosisata ruumiillistui Voltairessa, on taas Renanissa edustettuina muutamia niistä piirteistä, joita pidetään viime vuosisadalle olennaisina. Näiden tyypillisten, ikäänkuin historiallisesti välttämättömien mentaliteettien rinnalla jää Bergson paljon satunnaisemmaksi ilmiöksi. Senlisäksi on hän enemmän ammattifilosofi kuin edelliset.
    ellauri112.html on line 184: »Ajassa» on kerran ennen (vuosikerrassa 1911) tarkastettu muutamia Bergsonin filosofialle ominaisia, alkuperäisiä piirteitä. Tällä kertaa on tarkoitus kiinnittää huomiota niihin huomattaviin yhtäläisyyksiin, joita kaikesta huolimatta on olemassa Bergsonin ja hänen edeltäjänsä Renanin ajatustavan välillä. On pidetty Bergsonin filosofian huomattavimpana piirteenä sitä merkitystä, minkä hän antaa ajan realiteetille. On sanottu, että kun filosofia yleensä pyrkii katsomaan todellisuutta »iäisyyden näkökannalta», on sensijaan bergsonilaisuudelle ominaista »ajallisuuden näkökanta». »Aika» on tämän filosofian mukaan luova tekijä todellisuudessa, ei pelkkä subjektiivinen havainnonmuoto. Aika luo, todellisesti synnyttää uutta, samoinkuin sen hammas jäytää esineitä. »L'univers dure». Maailmankaikkeus on historiallinen ilmiö. Aivan yhtä syvästi on Renan vakuutettu ajan merkityksestä. »Aika näyttää minusta yhä enemmän olevan le facteur universel, la grand coefficient de l'eternal devenir» (Dialogues philosophiques, s. 155). 19. vuosisadan luonteenomainen piirre on Renanin mukaan, että dogmaatisen metodin sijaan on asetettu historiallinen metodi, kaikissa ihmishenkeä käsittelevissä tieteissä. »La catégorie du devenir» on asetettu »la catégorie de l'être'n» sijaan. Ennen puhuttiin uskonnosta, oikeudesta, jne. jonakin kerta kaikkiaan olemassaolevana, nykyään kaikki tuo käsitetään joksikin, joka paraikaa kehittyy. Kullakin tieteellä on tarkastettavanaan katkelma tätä ikuisen syntymisen vyyhteä. »Historia» sanan ahtaammassa merkityksessä on tässä suhteessa nuorin tieteistä; se käsittelee viimeistä myöhäisintä kautta tässä kehitysjaksossa. Filologia ja vertaileva mytologia valaisevat jo varhaisempaa kautta. Ihminen puhui ja loi myyttejä ennenkuin hän jätti jälkeensä kirjallisia muistomerkkejä. Ja näiden tieteiden takana alkavat paleontologian ja luonnonhistorian äärettömät taivaanrannat sarastaa. »Minä puolestani olen aina ajatellut, että lajien synnyn salaisuus piilee morfologiassa (kasvien ja eläinten muoto-opissa), että eläinmuodot ovat hieroglyyfikieli, jonka avain puuttuu meiltä, ja että koko menneisyyden selitys piilee niissä tosiseikoissa, jotka ovat meidän silmäimme edessä, mutta joita emme osaa lukea.» Mutta historiallisia dokumentteja eivät ole ainoastaan elolliset muodot; tähtisumuilla, linnunradalla on sama arvo. On tuleva aika, jolloin luonnontieteetkin muuttuvat historiallisiksi. »Muistelmissaan» valittaa Renan eräässä kohden sitä, että hän joutui harrastamaan historiallisia tieteitä, »noita vähäisiä arveluun perustuvia tieteitä, joista sadan vuoden perästä ei välitetä». Renan uskoo että jos hän olisi antautunut luonnontieteisiin, olisi hän johtunut useampiin Darwinin tuloksista, jotka hän väittää 1845:n tienoissa edeltäpäin aavistaneensa. Tätä valitusta ei tarvitse ottaa kovin vakavasti, sillä monista muista lausunnoista käy ilmi, että Renanin mielestä historiallisilla tieteillä on aivan erikoisen suuri filosofinen arvo.-- Toinen yhtymäkohta Renanin ja Bergsonin välillä on heidän »vitalistinen» käsityksensä kehityksen syistä. Bergson hylkää ajatuksen, että ulkonaiset, »mekaaniset» syyt aiheuttaisivat kehityksen. Elolliset muodot ovat hänen käsityksensä mukaan erään sisäisen sielullisen voiman tuote. Bergson on dualisti. Elottoman aineen rinnalla on maailmassamme vaikuttamassa edelliselle jyrkästi vastakkainen »élan vital», joka yhtenäisenä elämän virtana kuohuu kautta sukupolvien ja yksilöiden. Elottomassakin maailmassa vallitsee määräperäinen liike, mutta se on »putoamista», laskeutumista yhä alemmalle tasolle (entropia); »élan vital» sensijaan on vaivaloista ylöspäin ponnistamista. Elottomassa maailmassa energia hajaantuu ja haihtuu, mutta »élan vital» pyrkii sitä kasaamaan (lehtivihreä ja sen merkitys, orgaaniset yhdistykset).
    ellauri112.html on line 188: Kaikki tämä kuitenkin lisäyksellä kenties. Päinvastainen tulos on yhtä mahdollinen; ehkäpä kaiken tuon pyrkimyksen tuloksena on tyhjyys; ehkäpä totuus on masentava... On puhuttu niin paljon Renanin »skeptillisyydestä». Jotka tahtovat olla oikein moderneja, hekkumoivat niillä »Dyb af Skepsis» (Brandes), joita he näkevät Renanin harmittomimpienkin ajatusten alla. Muistuu mieleen »keisarin uudet vaatteet» ... Vastakkainen leiri näkee tässä epäilyssä, tässä hiljaisessa hymyssä, törkeää rienausta. Mutta oikeastaan Renan on »skeptikko» vain siksi, että hän niin mielellään tutkistelee asioita, joihin ei ajatuksemme anna mitään lopullista vastausta, joihin nähden vapaasti liikkuva pro et contra on ylin viisaus. Taasen syy siihen, että Renan alituisesti palaa uudelleen tutkistelemaan elämän ja maailman mahdollisuuksia ja tulevaisuuden perspektiivejä, vaikkei hän koskaan pääse pitemmälle kuin noihin »ehkä» ja »kenties», on luullakseni haettava hänen uskonnollisesta »dilettantismistaan». Lapsuutensa ja nuoruutensa hartaasta ja ylevästä katoolisuudesta vieraantui Renan vain järkensä, ei koskaan tunteensa puolesta. Syvä kaipaus, jolla hän jätti Saint Sulpicen seminaarin, ei hänessä koskaan sammunut. Mikään mahdollisuus ei hänelle myöhäiseen vanhuuteensa saakka ollut rakkaampi ajatella kuin se, että uskonto sittenkin olisi tosi. Viimeiseen saakka koettaa hän tieteellisesti ymmärrettyyn maailmankuvaan sovittaa uskonnollisia käsitteitä, Jumala, ylösnousemus, kuolemattomuus. Tämä alituinen ja yhä uudistuva askarteleminen perspektiivien kanssa, joista hän kuitenkin kerran on luopunut, on yhteydessä Renanin luonteen päättämättömyyden kanssa. Tämä päättämättömyys oli hänessä niin silmiinpistävä, että hänen vanha ystävänsä Berthelot saattaa epäillä olisiko Renan koskaan lopullisesti rikkonut väliänsä kirkon kanssa, ellei hänellä olisi ollut tukenaan sisarensa Henriette, voimakas, päättäväinen, syvä luonne, joka kaukaa lähettämillään kirjeillä auttoi Renanin seuraamaan vakaumustaan. Palatakseni takaisin käsitteisiin »nisus» ja »élan vital», on sanottava että ne eivät toisistaan eroa vain siinä, että edellinen on latinaa, jälkimäinen ranskaa! Renanin »nisus» laahaa alituisesti liepeissään tuote »ehkä» ja »kenties ei kuitenkaan». Renan on alituisesti tietoinen siitä, että metafyysillinen filosofia on pelkkää runoilua, mielikuvituksen leikkiä, jolla on tosin lakastumaton viehätyksensä, mutta joka on otettava cum grano salis. »Renanismin» rinnalla on »bergsonismi» karkeasti dogmaatinen. Empimättä uskoo Bergson metafyysillisiin kangastuksiinsa, jotka runollisen mielikuvituksen näkyinä kieltämättä ovat mukaansatempaavan kauniit.-- Kolmas yhtymäkohta Renanin ja Bergsonin välillä on kenties kaikista mieltäkiinnittävin. Se koskee spekulatiivisen järjen kantavuutta tiedonlähteenä ja spekulatiivisen tiedon arvoa. Renanin käsitys filosofian olennosta ja tehtävästä on kenties hieman huojuva. Mutta siinä suhteessa on se selvä, että hänen mielestään spekulatiivinen filosofia, jolla muka on oma tiedelähteensä ja omat metodinsa, on vähänarvoinen. Kaikki suuret filosofit ovat olleet suuria tiedemiehiä; Aristoteles, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant tiesivät kaiken, mitä heidän vuosisatansakin. Ne ajat taas, jolloin filosofia on muuttunut »spesialiteetiksi», ovat olleet sen alennuksen kausia. Sellainen oli myöhempi kartesiolaisuus (Malebranche), sellainen Renanin nuoruudessa Saksan spekulatiivinen idealismi. Meidän aikanamme näyttävät pitkin koko rintamaa tieteet, joko historialliset tai luonnontieteet, olevan määrätyt ottamaan vastaan filosofian perinnön. Filosofian täytyy tulla tieteelliseksi, ellei se tahdo tulla Penelopen kankaaksi, jota lakkaamatta ja aina turhaan aletaan uudelleen. Ja Renan uskoo, että sensijaan kuin edellisinä vuosisatoina luonnontieteet tuottivat parhaan aineiston filosofisille aateskeluille, »historia on meidän aikamme todellinen filosofia» (Essais de morale et de critique, s. 83).
    ellauri112.html on line 192: Syy siihen, että juuri käsitteet »vihreä», »punainen» jne. on muodostettu, eikä aivan toisia, piilee tietysti näiden vivahdusten käytännöllisessä merkityksessä. Lauselma: »logiikka ei tavoita vivahduksia» tarkoittaa siis: spekulatiivinen, aprioristinen logiikka ei tavoita vivahduksia. Kaikkia värivivahduksia ei voida ilmaista viidellä tai kuudella värinimityksellä. Mutta kokemustiede, kokemuksellinen logiikka tavoittaa kyllä mitä vivahduksia tahansa. Minulla on tällä hetkellä mielikuva ihan määrätystä punaisen vivahduksesta, joka imupaperillani on; jos tahtoisin, voisin nimittää tätä vivahdusta esim. klm: siten olisi uusi käsite muodostettu, käsite, joka tavoittaisi ihan määrätyn vivahduksen. Tällaisen käsitteen muodostaminen olisi kuitenkin kovin epätarkoituksenmukaista. Paljon tärkeämpiä kuin äärimäisen yksilölliset vivahdukset, kuin ne ominaisuudet, jotka kussakin esineessä ovat erilaisia, ovat yleensä esineiden yhteiset ominaisuudet. Käsite klm ilmaisisi vain yhdellä tai aivan harvoilla esineillä olevaa ominaisuutta, käsite »punainen» sellaista ominaisuutta, joka on lukemattomilla ja jonka jokainen omasta kokemuksestaan tuntee. Sanoin, että Renan yllämainitulla lauseellaan on lausunut julki Bergsonin filosofian ydinajatuksen. Mutta siinä tapauksessa Bergson on käsittänyt tuon lauseen ihan sananmukaisesti. Bergsonin mukaanhan kaikki logiikka, kaikki ajattelu on voimaton tavoittamaan todellisuutta, joka ei ole muuta kuin vivahduksia. Hänhän esittää, mitenkä inhimillinen äly on kuin valmiiden vaatteiden varasto, johon yritetään pukea todellisuus, katsomatta kuinka se niihin soveltuu. Hän vertaa älyämme kinematograafikoneeseen, joka ottaa muutamia liikkumattomia silmänräpäyskuvia elämän alituisesta virtailusta, ja yrittää näistä kuolleista kuvista uudelleen panna kokoon elävän todellisuuden. Hän puhuu ymmärryksemme »mekanistisesta vaistosta», joka viettää voittokulkuaan geometriassa, mutta on kykenemätön ratkaisemaan elämän arvoitusta. Tällä tavoin Bergson syyttää tiedettä virheestä, johon ei ollenkaan se, vaan juuri filosofia on tehnyt itsensä syypääksi-- spekulatiivisesta logiikasta, jota monet filosofit ovat rakastaneet, mutta joka tiedemiesten parhaille on ollut kauhistus. Näin yrittää hän riistää tieteeltä sananvallan sen mieltäkiinnittävimmissä kysymyksissä, ja panna sijalle runollisen »intuitionsa», jota ei millään keinoin voi kontrolloida, joka ei sisällä mitään mahdollisuutta eroittaa totuutta erehdyksestä. Jos koskaan, on filosofia Bergsonissa muuttunut »spesialiteetiksi». (Aika 10, 10-18) * * * * *
    ellauri112.html on line 196: Tri Eino Kaila: Kannatan leijonalippua semmoisena kuin se näinä päiwinä on liehunut Senaatin ja Säätytalon katolla. Siihen woiwat kaikki puolueet yhtyä. Sen komeisiin wäreihin liittyy se määrä omaa waltiollista historiaa, joka Suomella jo aikaisempina wuosisatoina on ollut. (Taputuxia oikeistotaantumuxen penkeiltä.)
    ellauri112.html on line 279: "Eugeniikka on itseohjattua ihmisen evoluutiota. Kuten puu, eugeniikkakin saa materiaalinsa monesta lähteestä ja järjestää ne harmoniseksi kokonaisuudeksi." Puun juurissa on sanoja kuten genetiikka, biologia, psykologia, tilastotiede, historia, antropologia, sosiologia, uskonto, lääketiede, laki ja politiikka. Toisen kansainvälisen eugeniikkakongressin logo vuodelta 1921. Eugeniikka (eli rodunjalostusoppi) on ihmisten jalostamista väestön parantamiseksi sukupolvien myötä.
    ellauri112.html on line 359: ''Manessen käsikirjoitus (Codex Manesse)'', saksalainen minnelauluja sisältävä käsikirjoitus 1300-luvulta. Keskiaika on Euroopan historian ajanjakso niin sanottujen ”vanhan ajan” ja ”uuden ajan” välissä, karkeasti 500-luvun alusta 1400-luvulle.
    ellauri112.html on line 394: Mefistofeles (myös Mephistophilus, Mephistophilis, Mephostopheles, Mephisto ja muita kirjoitusasuja) on Faust-legendassa esiintyvä paholaisen edustaja.
    ellauri112.html on line 600: Yes, we know that once a person has a kid their life changes completely, often with hardships and challenges along the way. But Reitman and Cody inject a level of warmth that prevents this from being simply depressing, at times it’s quite funny. Being a parent is a tough job, but it’s a necessary one – where would any of us be if there weren’t someone watching after us as toddlers?
    ellauri112.html on line 605: In other countries both parents can hold jobs and both may and must take parent leave. This quick-witted dark comedy had me laughing out loud.
    ellauri112.html on line 607: Drew’s brother Craig (Mark Duplass) only adds to her consternation. Craig and his wife are rich, over-achievers who can’t help but look down at Marlo’s messy mothering. Är dom inte äckliga? Spypåsarna till vänster om dörrarna. Life is not just boring, it is a fucking pile of clichés. You´ve seen one of them, you´ve seen them all. Jussi Snellman, don´t bother with reincarnation!
    ellauri112.html on line 611: Drew loves Marlo and their children, he’s taken on more responsibility in his job, which yields a higher paycheck, but as a result, he’s stressed out. Me töihis. Mee Kouvolaan!
    ellauri112.html on line 617: It’s these little moments that Reitman captures so well. Like Ron Livingston’s detached husband, who routinely retreats to his room to hide under a video game headset.
    ellauri112.html on line 618: There is cheerful satire when Marlo and Drew visit Craig and his fashionable, snooty wife Elyse (Elaine Tan), who tells Marlo she can relate to the hurdles of pregnancy, especially when it cut into her gym routine.
    ellauri112.html on line 656: What is great but something of a letdown is that the story never tries to turn the two women against each other. Like old vs young, fat vs skinny, a dish vs disgusting, master and slave, rich vs poor, two women and Drew the only man in town. None of that shit. That Hollywood cliché might have helped launch a thriller, but it has no place here. This film is far more boring, feminist and humanist. Yawn.
    ellauri112.html on line 662: Make no mistake this is one complex and affecting film about motherhood.
    ellauri112.html on line 683: Marlo, already a mother of two, begins the film heavily, outrageously pregnant: we learn, in rapid succession, that this third pregnancy was unwanted, that her husband does little of the domestic labour, and that her “shitty” upbringing is the reason she’s so committed to her nuclear family unit. Postnatal depression, never named, haunts the narrative: her wealthy brother offers to pay for a night nanny to avoid, in his words, the advent of another “bad time” like the one that followed the birth of her son, Jonah. When the nanny arrives – described by more than one reviewer as a “millennial Mary Poppins” – the panacea seems to be working. Not only does she look after the baby at night but she also operates as a kind of empathy machine, listening to Marlo’s problems, sharing sangria in the garden, and baking the Minions cupcakes that Marlo herself never has the time to make. The postnatal depression, it seems, disperses; Jonah – who has “emotional problems” – finds a place at a school more suited to his needs, family dinners get increasingly wholesome, and Marlo does a passable Stevie Nicks impression at a child’s birthday party. And then comes the twist: after a bender in Brooklyn with Tully, a sleep-deprived Marlo, drunk at the wheel, drives her car off a bridge and ends up in hospital, and we realise there was nobody else in the car. Her maiden name, we learn, was Tully.
    ellauri112.html on line 687: I found this one to be a boring display of what I like to call ‘critic bait’: a movie targeted at film journalists who will believe anything put onscreen from these two is worthy of never-ending praise.
    ellauri112.html on line 689: The film is supposedly an ode to the ‘modern parenthood experience’ that’s interspersed with ‘humor and raw honesty.’ I wouldn’t know because I don’t have kids. Perhaps this realism is lost on me because I’m not a parent, but that’s where the film breaks down: it failed to spark even an ounce of empathy in me for its protagonist. Motherhood is portrayed as many childless people like me envision, an absolute misery of an existence (I left the theater thinking thank god I don’t have kids). A successful film would have made Marlo’s predicament relatable to everyone.
    ellauri112.html on line 691: Theron is more than capable and proves she’s up to the challenge of the role and its physical demands, but this isn’t as Oscar worthy as some are crowing. How gutsy and brave her performance is! they’ll surely shout, all because she dons a partial fat suit (the actress also gained a very real 50 pounds for the role), doesn’t wear makeup, has unkempt hair and bags under her eyes. Interestingly enough, it seems to be those same critics who ripped Amy Schumer and her “I Feel Pretty” to shreds for ‘fat shaming’ or poking fun at the way women look. Candid and authentic simply because she doesn’t look like the gorgeous movie star that she is? I don’t think so.
    ellauri112.html on line 693: The same can be said for Cody’s rough around the edges, unsubtle screenplay. This is far from her best work and for once, she seems to have written herself into a corner. Some of the narrative is so contrived that it’s dripping with cliché, crowded with irritating, pithy platitudes dressed up in a bright hipster bow. Worst of all, the film treats serious post-partum depression as a gimmicky afterthought and even tacks on a borderline inappropriate ‘gotcha!’ ending.
    ellauri112.html on line 697: Honestly, I expected the parenting tropes to be far worse ... There simply weren´t enough bodily fluids to make this a truly authentic parental experience. I liked the “motherhood as body horror” approach, nyökkii toinen samanlainen.
    ellauri112.html on line 701: I appreciated the fact that a troubled mom did seek help, I’m just not sure the script needed the plot twist. I didn’t immediately warm to this flick. Actually, I often alternated between exasperation and captivation – and a key plot twist at the end left a sour taste in my mouth, though for petty reasons. Nonetheless, something about it didn’t feel quite right. It took one observation from a friend afterward to allow for the film’s brilliance to bloom in my mind.
    ellauri112.html on line 727: The film’s strength – for its first two thirds – is the relationship between the two women at the heart of the narrative. We learn through a clumsy coincidence at the beginning of the film that Marlo is bisexual; as her intimacy with Tully expands to fill the vacuum of her absentee marriage, it becomes a tender eroticism. This is mediated, always, through other bodies: as Tully cradles the baby who has just finished feeding, she talks about how the ‘molecules’ of the child still exist within the mother; later, in a bar toilet, she gently wets a paper towel and uses it to draw the milk out of Marlo’s swollen breasts. In a pivotal scene, Marlo sits behind Tully and instructs her on what to do to arouse her sleep-befuddled husband. This moment can be read as emblematic of the film’s mistreatment of the queer intimacy it establishes. Coming after a discussion of sexual history and sexual fantasy, Marlo reveals to Tully that she has a waitress’s uniform that she’s never used, bought to surprise her husband. As Tully puts the outfit on, which fits her pre-natal body in a way it wouldn’t Marlo, the moment of sexual possibility between the women is subsumed into heteronormative, ageist fantasy: Tully’s young, and therefore fantasy-appropriate, body is used as bait to ‘recharge’ the masculine battery.
    ellauri112.html on line 729: The revelation that Tully is a version of Marlo’s former self removes the possibility of a different life she represented. “I love us,” Marlo’s husband says to her, as she lies in her hospital bed. “I love us too,” she replies. This collective noun is the acceptance of the status quo, just as Tully’s last speech, in which she tells Marlo she should embrace her dull life – “being boring means you’re doing it right” – is an endorsement of the sacrifices society requires of her. The final scene, in which Marlo’s husband helps her make the packed lunches, is bathed in a saccharine glow: learn to love your claustrophobia, it tells women. The nuclear family is the only one worth having.
    ellauri112.html on line 782: Anaalis-obsessiiviset tyypit jaxaa nykertää jotain pykälää tai hinkata itseään koko aika puhtaaxi. Pyhistely ja julmat säännöstöt on yxi apinoiden geenilinjoista, joka pitää lauman kurissa ja auttaa välttelemään viruslinkoja. Tämä viimeinen luonnevika on uskontojen ominta reviiriä.
    ellauri112.html on line 789: When shall we eat supper? First or last day of the week? This has nothing to do with the Sabbath being changed. I do not believe that it has, but that it is obsolete. The Sabbath is “Saturday”, the 7th day, which I am convinced to be for the rest that Christians will take with the Father (Heb. 4:1-11) and for weekend shopping. I find keeping the Sabbath day is a part of the 10 commands. Exodus says “And He wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments” (Exo. 34:28, also see Deut. 4:13, 9:9, 11). Jeremiah said “Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant” (Jeremiah 31:31). Look further for Jeremiah said, “not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers”
    ellauri112.html on line 791: Not according to which covenant? Jeremiah says the covenant “in the day that I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke” (31:32). Again which covenant is this? Exodus says “And He wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments” (Exo. 34:28). Christ’s covenant is “not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers”, but “In that He says, ‘A new covenant,’ He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away” (Heb. 8:13). The Old Covenant of the 10 commands with the Sabbath keeping is obsolete and vanishing away in the 1st century.
    ellauri112.html on line 793: “But if the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of the glory of his countenance, which glory was passing away, how will the ministry of the Spirit not be more glorious?” (2 Cor. 3:7-8).
    ellauri112.html on line 795: If I kept the 7th day as the Sabbath rest, then I’d be “a debtor to keep the whole law”, and then I will “become estranged from Christ” and “fallen from grace” (Gal. 5:3-4). I will not be estranged from Christ and fall from His grace nor will I teach my family nor my congregation family this. Who wants to keep all those 10 plus obsolete paragraphs anyway? Love is all you need.
    ellauri112.html on line 810:
    Dr. Welch in his sweet beard

    ellauri112.html on line 819: “God himself provides ‘wine which makes man’s heart glad’ just as He gives ‘food which sustains man’s heart’ (Ps. 104:14.15). He promises His people that, if they will obey Him, He will bless them with an abundance of wine (Deut 7:13, 11:14, Prov. 3:10. etc.). He threatens to withdraw this blessing from them if they disobey His law (Deut. 28:39, 51; Isa. 62:8). The Scriptures clearly teach that God permits His people to enjoy wine and strong drink as a gift from Him. ‘You may spend the money for whatever your heart desires, for oxen, or sheep, or wine, or strong drink, or whatever your heart desires; and there you shall eat in the presence of the Lord your God and rejoice, you and your household’ (Deut. 14:26).
    ellauri112.html on line 829: That was Raquel Welch with his sweet beard for his two bits. Next we hear out Whittington.
    ellauri112.html on line 833:
    Brad Whittington in his sweet toothy smile

    ellauri112.html on line 838: He is dead but buy his book What Would Jesus Drink? by Brad Whittington. Price: $0.99 USD. Words: 38,770. Language: English. Published: August 13, 2011. Categories: Autofiction » Religion & Spirituality » Christianity. It includes 247 verses from the bible and the rest of it as appendix for further reading. Brad Whittington's tag cloud: alcohol beer jesus wine.
    ellauri112.html on line 840: Since 2017, he is sitting on that tiny cloud. Since 2014 with The Whittington Group, Brad has sourced, entitled and sold 10 communities consisting of 1,628 lots to homebuilders. In 2016, Brad's son, Braden, moved to Austin with his family to join Brad in business, fulfilling a lifelong dream of working side by side. A gentle man of faith, Brad was also an avid golfer and seasoned snow skier.
    ellauri112.html on line 842: In his book, What Would Jesus Drink, Brad Whittington breaks down the biblical references of alcohol into three types. In all, there are 247 references to alcohol in Scripture. 40 are negative (warnings about drunkenness, potential dangers of alcohol, etc.), 145 are positive (sign of God´s blessing, use in worship, etc.), and 62 are neutral (people falsely accused of being drunk, vows of abstinence, etc.) The Bible is anything but silent on the issue of wine. The bible, like tequila, must be imbued carefully, seen as a blessing, and received with a grain of salt. It must not be abused. The old saying is true, "Wine is from God, drunkenness is from the Devil."
    ellauri112.html on line 853: Those asserting that Jesus made intoxicating wine are also implying that Jesus was encouraging a drinking party, vain drinking, and drunkenness. Wayne Jackson says in his article, “What about Moderate Social Drinking?”,
    ellauri112.html on line 855: “There is no proof that the ‘wine’ at the marriage feast in Cana was fermented. The Greek word for ‘wine’ in this text is oinos, which may refer to a fermented beverage (cf. Eph. 5:18), or it may denote freshly squeezed grape juice (cf. Isa. 16:10 – LXX). Since the word for ‘wine’ is generic, the student has no right to import the concept of an alcoholic beverage into this passage without contextual justification—of which there is none.”
    ellauri112.html on line 859: Jesus mentions the specific content of the cup to drink is “fruit of the vine” or an even better translation “fruit of the grapevine”. There is no indication of its fermentation. Add to all of this that Jesus used unleavened bread because it was the time of the Passover when God commanded Israel to throw out all leaven. The grape juice would have been unleavened too at least in the sense of having additional yeast rather than wild yeast. What does that mean? The throwing out of leaven would have also included the throwing out of highly intoxicating wine that contained additional yeast.
    ellauri112.html on line 872: Jackson has vehemently denied that the meeting is a publicity stunt, or that his network was paid by the Trump campaign for the interview. John Calvin too emphasized tolerance in his Institutes of the Christian Religion:
    ellauri112.html on line 880: The fact that Paul instructed Timothy to “take a little wine for his stomach’s sake” involves several things.
    ellauri112.html on line 884: Second, Timothy obviously suffered from a stomach ailment which required a medicinal remedy. The water in Asia Minor can be very dangerous, hence the young evangelist was encouraged to take “a little wine” along with his water. The sentence is elliptical: “Be no longer a drinker of water [alone], but [with it] take a little wine” (1 Tim. 5:23).
    ellauri112.html on line 886: This text must be edited by deleting and adding words as indicated. This is often a good procedure, in particular the word "not" may suitably be edited where it seems indicated. Like: I [among others] am your god, do not keep [many] other gods. [Do not keep cats or dogs either.]
    ellauri112.html on line 895: Yet, in what is surely one of the great tragedies of history, worse than genocide, the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper has become an occasion for confusion and division. For example, even men of good will, professing the Bible to be their guide, have disagreed as to the exact nature of Christ’s presence in the Lord’s Supper. More recently, Christians have differed about the frequency of intercourse and the subjects of intercourse. But we will not consider such matters as these here.
    ellauri112.html on line 899: This website is intended to answer these questions.
    ellauri112.html on line 901: First, on the next page of this web site, we will study a few Bible passages concerning the public worship of God in general. We do so for simple reasons. “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17, NKJV). Worship is a “good work,” but we are not to lean on our own understanding (Proverbs 3:5). Only the Bible can teach us how to worship God in a manner that pleases Him. All our worship, including our observance of the Lord’s Supper, ought to rest on a biblical foundation.
    ellauri112.html on line 903: Second, we will devote two pages to the Bible passages that concern the cup in the Lord’s Supper. One page will consider the passages in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. On this page, we will study Jesus’s words, “the fruit of the vine,” in their original context, and we will also learn how these words were used in the Passover meal before and during the time Jesus spoke them. The other page will consider the two relevant passages in I Corinthians, and what they teach us about the contents of the cup. Rather than grow our discussion beyond all bounds, we will limit ourselves to what the Bible says about the contents of the communion cup.
    ellauri112.html on line 905: Third, since we cannot understand wine in the Lord´s Supper without also understanding what the Bible teaches us about wine in general, we will examine this topic too. We will see what the Holy Scriptures teach about the ways wine was used, whether drinking wine is a sin, the sin of drunkenness, the "two-wines theory," and the wide-spread bias against wine.
    ellauri112.html on line 919: We also briefly summarize the current positions of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America, as described by synodical decisions in 2002, 2010, 2017, and 2019. This page also includes an analysis of these decisions.
    ellauri112.html on line 923: The last three pages of this web site contain an epilogue, a list of suggested readings for those who want to pursue their study of wine in the Lord´ Supper, and information about this web site and its author. The about page also contains a link to a downloadable paper about wine in the Lord´s Supper. (This paper is available as either a .doc or a .pdf.)
    ellauri112.html on line 927: If anyone would rather hear about wine in the Lord´s Supper, instead of reading about it, he or she is welcome to watch a 14 minute video at Wine in the Lord´s Supper video. (However, this web site is much more complete than the video.)
    ellauri112.html on line 929: A website such as this one may seem unnecessary and needless, because many men and churches have already spoken. Even when official statements are lacking, it might appear that the actual practices of churches and men have already decided the truth of the matter. And, indeed, we ought to give the opinions of men and the practices of the churches all the consideration they deserve.
    ellauri112.html on line 931: However, only the Bible is inspired and infallible. Only the Bible can be the rule of our faith and practice. Where the Bible is silent, we will seek to be silent as well. Where the Bible speaks, we will seek to yield faithful obedience. Where it contradicts the opinions of men, or the practices of churches, we will say, “To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them” (Isaiah 8:20).
    ellauri112.html on line 933: We should agree with the Westminster Confession of Faith, which teaches us that “The supreme judge by which all controversies of religion are to be determined, and all decrees of councils, opinions of ancient writers, doctrines of men, and private spirits, are to be examined, and in whose sentence we are to rest, can be no other but the Hard Spirit speaking in the Scripture.” As it is with all controversies of religion, so it is with this one. Smell the breath of the Lord.
    ellauri112.html on line 943: God never intended that grapes, grain, the poppy, the marijuana plant, be used as recreational, mind-altering, behavior-modifying substances. This page he intentionally left blank.
    ellauri115.html on line 31:
    Nuoren Jean-Jacquesin polvihousut ahistaa. Pian se jo pääsee melomaan. Annapa se pussikeppi tänne niin mä näytän miten me katoliset pyllistellään.

    ellauri115.html on line 89: kohisi hiljaa loput veret pois.
    ellauri115.html on line 174: Therese war Rousseau bemerkenswert ergeben, wenn man seine schwierige Natur und sein herzloses Verhalten gegenüber den fünf gemeinsamen ausserehelich geborenen Kindern betrachtet. Trotz der Proteste seiner Frau (nicht aber Ehefrau) bestand Rousseau darauf, dass die Kinder jeweils nach der Geburt einem Findelhaus übergeben wurden. Seine Begründungen waren philosophisch - zum Beispiel sei das der einzige Weg, "ihre Ehre zu retten", da sie nicht verheiratet waren. Er nannte Therese "Tante" und "Herrin", nicht aber "Königin", doch ging seine Unterwürfigkeit nie so weit, dass er sie um Prügel bat, und er klagte dass sie im Bett kalt war. Kreivitär Houdetotin perään J-J läähätti niin kovasti, että sai elinikäisen nivuskohjun jatkuvasta stondista. Sophie Houdetot oli schrecklich moralische Julien esikuva kirjassa Uusi Heloise.
    ellauri115.html on line 176: J-J oli kova kalufetischisti myäs, se pussaili huonekaluja ja kyhnytti izeään vasten heilojensa asusteita ja kirjelappuja. (Teresa piti sitä hulluna.) Se hiippaili hämärillä kaduilla ja näytti naisille paljasta pyllyä siinä toivossa että joku läpsäyttäisi sen perskankkuja. Kerran se koitti kusexia kaivolla nuorten neitosten nähden, ja oli saada turpiinsa vihaisilta ämmiltä.
    ellauri115.html on line 195: Apaiseri oli aikoinaan Nabun kanssa keskustellut paljonkin jumalista sekä uskosta sekä orjien verilöylyn jälkeen, kun hän seurasi hattilaista Suppiluliumaa, öiden hiljaisuudessa mietiskellyt jumalien ja ihmiskohtalon välistä arvoitusta. Hänestä oli jumalissa liian paljon järjetöntä, sillä hänen kovat kokemuxensa olivat osoittaneet hänelle heidän tekojensa olevan ihmistekoja huonommat. Vertauskuvallisesti he panivat aasin selkään ylettömän kuorman, ruoskivat juhtaansa tämän voihkeesta huolimatta eivätkä antaneet tälle juomaa ja vihantaa rehua. Kaiken sen takia heitä piti ylistää hyvixi. Hän oli pitkinä öinä tullut siihen eriskummalliseen ja hänen tietääxeen pappeja kauhistuttavaan johtopäätöxeen, että jumalat, joiden luultiin puhuvan ajattelevan kuin ihminen, eivät olleet mitään jumalia, vaan ihmisten ajatuxia, jotka kuolisivat heidän kanssaan. Ihmisten mielikuvitusjumalat ne näyttäytyivät näyissä, nämä ne puhuivat, vaativat, vihastuivat ja leppyivät. Yxikään elävä ihminen ei tietänyt, mikä oli oikea tai oikeat jumalat. Ei ollut olemassa mitään syytä, joiden tähden jumala olisi paljastautunut ihmisille.
    ellauri115.html on line 260: Käännettyään takkia Chateaubriandin Conservi-lehden toimittajanta ja kuninkaan kannattajanta tasavaltalaisexi Vihtori joutui Napsu III:n toimesta maanpakoon 9 vuodexi Guernseyn saarille. Adèlen vastalauseista huolimatta Hugo osti Guernseystä talon ja asettui aloilleen. Aamupäivisin hän työskenteli tuntikausia talon harjalle rakennuttamassaan työhuoneessa ja lähti sitten iltapäivisin kävelylle lähistöllä asuvan Julietten kaa. Iltaisin se pelasi korttia muiden poliittisten pakolaisten kanssa. Talossa kävi virtanaan vieraita. Adèle kokkasi keittiössä, tiskasi ja piti kirjaa menoista. Huugo kirjoitti izestään runokokoelman "Vuosisatojen legenda". Hugon palatessa Pariisiin väki hurrasi. Kyynelet silmissä Huugo julisti jotakin.
    ellauri115.html on line 300: But let's give Montaigne some credit for doing his part. What's this... his grandfather was Jewish? Why are we not surprised?
    ellauri115.html on line 370: Sentään ahistun jostain hammaslääkäristä ja kiukustun kun mua pidetään ihan narrina. Viekää mut baariin veljet tuoppi ostakaa, hitto mä en ole mikään pelle jos mies en olla saa.
    ellauri115.html on line 389: In the year 1766 Rousseau had just cause to fear for his life. For more than three years he had been a refugee, forced to move on several times. His radical tract, The Social Contract, with its famous opening salvo, "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains", had been violently condemned. Even more threatening to the French Catholic church was Émile, in which Rousseau advocated denying the clergy a role in the education of the young. An arrest warrant was issued in Paris and his books were publicly burned. "A cry of unparalleled fury" went up across Europe. "I was an infidel, an atheist, a lunatic, a madman, a wild beast, a wolf ..."
    ellauri115.html on line 391: Some believed this lean, dark man whose eyes were full of fire was possessed by the devil.
    ellauri115.html on line 392: One night, a drunken mob attacked his house. Rousseau was inside with his mistress, the former scullery maid Thérèse le Vasseur (by whom he had five children that he notoriously abandoned to a foundling hospital), and his beloved dog, Sultan. A shower of stones was thrown at the window. A rock "as big as a head" nearly landed on Rousseau's head, no bed. When a local official finally arrived, he declared, "My God, it's a quarry."
    ellauri115.html on line 394: Hume was immensely proud of his upright reputation; one might say he gloried in his goodness. In 1776, close to death from bowel cancer, he summarised his life in a short, unrevealing essay. He was, he wrote, "a man of mild disposition, of command of temper, of an open, social, and cheerful humour, capable of attachment, but little susceptible of enmity, and of great moderation in all my passions".
    ellauri115.html on line 396: Hume still felt, justly, under-appreciated. The "banks of the Thames", he insisted, were "inhabited by barbarians". There was not one Englishman in 50 "who if he heard I had broke my neck tonight would be sorry". Englishmen disliked him, Hume believed, both for what he was not and for what he was: not a Whig, not a Christian, but definitely a Scot. In England, anti-Scottish prejudice was rife. But his homeland too seemed to reject him. The final humiliation came in June 1763, when the Scottish prime minister, the Earl of Bute, appointed another Scottish historian, William Robertson, to be Historiographer Royal for Scotland.
    ellauri115.html on line 398: Hume's friends travelling in France had already told him about his incomparable standing in Parisian society. And the two years he spent in Paris were to be the happiest of his life. He was rapturously embraced there, loaded, in his words, "with civilities". Hume stressed the near-universal judgment on his personality and morals. "What gave me chief pleasure was to find that most of the elogiums bestowed on me, turned on my personal character; my naivety & simplicity of manners, the candour and mildness of my disposition &tc." Indeed, his French admirers gave him the sobriquet Le Bon David, the good David.
    ellauri115.html on line 400: The lavish attention paid by women must have come as a pleasant shock to this obese bachelor in his 50s. James Caulfeild (later Lord Charlemont), who'd once described Hume's face as "broad and fat, his mouth wide, and without any other expression than that of imbecility", observed how in Paris, "no lady's toilette was complete without Hume's attendance".
    ellauri115.html on line 402: Hume penned an unreserved panegyric to a clerical friend in Scotland comparing Rousseau to Socrates and, like a starry-eyed lover, seeing beauty in his adored one's blemishes: "I find him mild, and gentle and modest and good humoured ... M. Rousseau is of small stature; and would rather be ugly, had he not the finest physiognomy in the world, I mean, the most expressive countenance. His modesty seems not to be good manners but ignorance of his own excellence."
    ellauri115.html on line 404: Several of his philosopher friends tried to shake Hume from his complacency. Grimm, D'Alembert and Diderot all spoke from personal experience, having had a spectacular falling-out with the belligerent Rousseau in the previous decade.
    ellauri115.html on line 406: In consequence, they had totally severed relations with him. Most chilling was the warning from Baron d'Holbach. It was 9pm on the night before Hume and Rousseau set out for England. Hume had gone for his final farewell. Apologising for puncturing his illusions, the baron counselled Hume that he would soon be sadly disabused. "You don't know your man. I will tell you plainly, you're warming a viper in your bosom."
    ellauri115.html on line 408: Of course it must have been galling for Hume, hailed in Paris, to be reduced, in the shrewd observation of an intimate Edinburgh friend, William Rouet, Professor of Ecclesiastical and Civil History, to being "the show-er of the lion". The lion stood out in his bizarre Armenian outfit, complete with gown and cap with tassels, and was almost everywhere accompanied by his dog, Sultan. Hume was astounded by the fuss, somewhat meanly putting it down to Rousseau's curiosity value.
    ellauri115.html on line 410: He was still insistent on his love for Rousseau - at least when writing to his French friends. He told one, "I have never known a man more amiable and more virtuous than he appears to me; he is mild, gentle, modest, affectionate, disinterested; and above all, endowed with a sensibility of heart in a supreme degree ... for my part, I think I could pass all my life in his company without any danger of our quarrelling ..." Indeed, a source of their concord, Hume thought, was that neither one of them was disputatious. When he repeated the sentiments to D'Holbach, the baron was glad that Hume had "not occasion to repent of the kindness you have shown ... I wish some friends, whom I value very much, had not more reasons to complain of his unfair proceedings, printed imputations, ungratefulness &c."
    ellauri115.html on line 412: Rousseau was already seized with the glimmerings of a plot; he warned his Swiss friends that his letters were being intercepted and his papers in danger. By June, the plot was starkly clear to him in all its ramifications - and at its centre was Hume. On June 23, he rounded on his saviour: "You have badly concealed yourself. I understand you, Sir, and you well know it." And he spelled out the essence of the plot: "You brought me to England, apparently to procure a refuge for me, and in reality to dishonour me. You applied yourself to this noble endeavour with a zeal worthy of your heart and with an art worthy of your talents." Hume was mortified, furious, scared. He appealed to Davenport for support against "the monstrous ingratitude, ferocity, and frenzy of the man".
    ellauri115.html on line 414: Hume's eyes were on France, in particular, and his reputation as the good David. His first denunciations of Rousseau were made to his friends in Paris; his Concise and Genuine Account of the Dispute between Mr. Hume and Mr. Rousseau would be published there in French, edited by Rousseau's enemies. He studiously avoided communicating with Mme de Boufflers, knowing she would, as she did, urge "generous pity". Hume's descriptions of Rousseau as ferocious, villainous and treacherous ensured joyful coverage in newspapers and discussions in fashionable drawing rooms, clubs and coffee houses. The actor-manager David Garrick wrote to a friend on July 18 that Rousseau had called Hume "noir, black, and a coquin, knave".
    ellauri115.html on line 416: In his reply to Rousseau, Hume (unwisely) demanded that Rousseau identify his accuser and supply full details of the plot. To the first, Rousseau's answer was simple and powerful: "That accuser, Sir, is the only man in the world whose testimony I should admit against you: it is yourself." To the second, Rousseau supplied an indictment of 63 lengthy paragraphs containing the incidents on which he relied for evidence of the plot and how Hume had deviously pulled it off. This he mailed to his foe on July 10 1766. The whole document managed to be simultaneously quite mad but resonating with inspired mockery and tragic sentiment.
    ellauri115.html on line 424: Hume had demolished the arguments purporting to prove the existence of God, including Rousseau's favourite argument from design - the claim that only a supreme and benevolent being could explain the wonder and order in the world. This argument, Hume insisted, was untenable. How could it account for the suffering in the world? How can we infer that there is just one architect of the world, and not a co-operative of two or more?
    ellauri115.html on line 427: Hume suggested to Mme de Boufflers and others that for his own sake Rousseau would best be locked away as a madman. Le Bon David's reason had become a slave to his passions.
    ellauri115.html on line 429: Moreover, Rousseau advocated the opinion that, insofar as they lead people to virtue, all religions are equally worthy, and that people should therefore conform to the religion in which they have been brought up. This religious indifferentism caused Rousseau and his books to be banned from France and Geneva. He was condemned from the pulpit by the Archbishop of Paris, his books were burned and warrants were issued for his arrest. Former friends such as Jacob Vernes of Geneva could not accept his views, and wrote violent rebuttals.
    ellauri115.html on line 433: Around this time, Rousseau started developing feelings of paranoia, anxiety, and of a conspiracy against him. Most of this was just his imagination at work, but on 29 January 1768, the theatre at Geneva was destroyed through burning, and Voltaire mendaciously accused Rousseau of being the culprit. In June 1768, Rousseau left Trie, leaving Therese behind, and went first to Lyon, and subsequently to Bourgoin. He now invited Therese to this place and "married" her, under his alias "Renou" in a faux civil ceremony in Bourgoin on 30 August 1768.
    ellauri115.html on line 478: Hokasin myös että filosofit ei suinkaan vapauttaneet mua turhista epäilyistä, vaan moninkertaistivat mua kiusaavat epäilyt eivätkä poistaneet niistä mitään. Niinet mä valizin toisen oppaan ja sanoin, "Eiku mä seuraan sisävaloa, se ei johda mua niin harhaan kuin muiden ulkovalaistus, tai jos se tekee niin, vika on mun omani, enkä mene niin paljon mezään seuratessani omia höpötyxiäni kuin jos lähden muiden vedätyxiin."
    ellauri115.html on line 488: Clarke sided with Locke and Newton against Descartes in denying that we have knowledge of the essence of substances, even though we can be sure that there are at least two kinds of substances (mental and material) because their properties (thinking and divisibility) are incompatible. He defended natural religion against the naturalist view that nature constitutes a self-sufficient system and defended revealed religion against deism. Clarke adopted Newton’s natural philosophy early on. Through his association with Newton, Clarke was the de facto spokesperson for Newtonianism in the first half the eighteenth century, not only explaining the natural science but also providing a metaphysical support and theological interpretation for it.
    ellauri115.html on line 542: Jos aine liikkeessä viittilöi kohti jotain tahtoa, määrättyjen lakien alainen liike musta viittaa johkin superälyyn; tää on mun uskontunnustuxen toka artikla. Toiminta, vertailu ja valikointi on aktiivisen ajattelevan olennon operatiivista toimintaa; siis tämmöinen olento on olemassa. [Tää on tää iänikuinen kelloseppävertaus, joka sattuneesta syystä on mulle eri mieluisa.] Ei ainoastaan kiertävissä taivaankehissä, eikä auringossa josta tulee valoa, eikä yxin mussa izessäni, jonka pyllystä se päivä paistaa, vaan märehtivässä lampaassa, lentävässä linnussa, sen päähän putoovassa kivessä, tuulen puhaltamassa lehdessä. Kun aalto vapaa rannan tapaa, siinäkin soi bluuuuuus.
    ellauri115.html on line 561: On totta siis, että mies on loordi maalla jonka päällä se olexii; sillä ei ainoastaan se kesytä kaikki muut elukat, ei ainoastaan se kontrolloi luonnonvaroja ahkeralla teollisuudella; vaan se yxin tietää miten kontrolloida niitä; sillä pysyy kaikki mainiosti hanskassa; kontemploimalla se matkustaa vaikka tähdissä vaikkei pääse sinne pers.kohtasesti. Näytä mulle toinen elukka maan päällä joka osaa antaa tulta ja joka osaa kazoa ihaillen aurinkoon ilman laseja. Mitä! Mähän voin huomioida ja tuntea [raamatullisessa mielessä] kaikki elukat ja niiden sukulaiset; mä voin ihan tuntea mitä tarkoittaa järjestys, kauneus ja miehisyys; mähän voin miettiä Miss Universumia ja nostaa lihan kohti sitä käyttämättä kättäni; mähän rakastan hyvää ja teen temput sille; miten mä sitten voisin verrata izeäni joihinkin tyhmiin elukoihin? Kurja sielu, sun surkea filosofia tekee sut elukkamaisexi; tai pikemmink turhaan sä yrität alentaa izesi; sun [tai siis mun] nerokkuus osottaa sun periaatteet väärixi, sun ystävällinen sydän näyttää ne väärixi, ja jopa sun vallan vääränkäyttö osoittaa kuinka etevä sä olet. [Ei kyllä tää Rousseau on perusteellisesti paska mies.]
    ellauri115.html on line 579: Eternally noble, historically fair;
    ellauri115.html on line 657: Mitä enemmän mä ajattelen ajatusta ja apinan mielen luonnetta, sitä enemmän samankaltaisuutta mä nään materialistien argumenteilla ja ton sokean miehen ehdotuxella. Ize asiassa, ne eivät nää homunculusta joka kyykistelee niiden sisällä ja huutaa suulla suuremmalla vaikka vaimealla äänellä. Kone ei ajattele, siinä ei ole koneistoa eikä naamataulua joka vois tuottaa heijastuxia; jokin sun sisällä pyrkii ulos polvihousuista; avaruus ei ole sun mittapuku, miss universumi ei riitä sun sisätilaxi; sun sentimentit, sun halut, sun ahistus, sun ylpeys ennenkaikkea, on peräisin jostain muualta kuin sun pienestä hämärästä aukosta josta on niin ahdas päästä sisälle.
    ellauri115.html on line 670: history/faculty/kelly/wciv/rights/rousseau.jpg" height="200px" />
    ellauri115.html on line 695: Mä olen tietoinen sielustani; mä ihan tunnen sen ja ajattelen sitä tuon tuostakin; mä tiedän mikä sen on vaikken tiedä mitä se oikeasti on; mä en voi järkeillä asioista jota mä en tunne. Se minkä mä tiedän on että mun henk.koht. identiteetti riippuu mun muistista, ja että ollaxeni sama mun ptää muistaa et mä olin olemassa. Mä en muistaisi kuoleman jälkeen millanen mä olin elävänä ellen mä muista miltä musta tuntui ja mitä mä tein; enkä epäile että just sen muistaminen tulee olemaan hyvisten palkkio ja pahisten kidutus. Tässä maailmassa sisäinen tietoisuus uppoaa innokkaiden passiohedelmien hälinään jotka estää katumisen. Miehuuden harjoituxesta seuraava nöyryyytys ja häpeä estää näkemästä sen charmia. Mut kun vapautuneina ruumiinaistien illuusioista silmäilemme iloisina ylintä pomoa ja ikuisia totuuxia jotka siitä valuvat; kun kaikki meidän sielunvoimat on hereillä järjestyxen kauneuteen ja me ollaan täysin uppoutuneita vertaamaan sitä mitä tuli tehtyä siihen mitä olis pitänyt, niin silloin omantunnon ääni pääsee täyteen volaan nupit kaakossa; silloin puhdas riemastus joka tulee izetyytyväisyydestä, ja terävä katumus izensä nolaamisesta ratkaisee ylivoimaisella tunteella mikä tulee olemaan kunkin omavalmisteinen osa kuonpuoleisessa. Hyvä ystäväiseni, älä kysy onko siellä muita ilon tai kärsimyxen aiheita; mä en tiedä kun en ole käynyt kazomassa vielä; tää minkä mä voin kuvitella riittää mulle lohdutuxexi tässä elämässä ja saa odottamaan kärsimättömästi seuraavaa. Mä en sano et hyviä palkitaan, sillä mitä suurempaa hyvää voi tosi hyvä olento kuvitella kuin olla niinkuin kotonaan? Mut mä sanon kyllä että hyvät tulevat olemaan onnellisia, koska niiden money maker, kaiken oikeudenkäytön ylin auktoriteetti, joka on tehnyt ne tunteilemaan kykenevixi, ei ole tehnyt niitä kärsiskelemään; sitäpaizi, ne ei ole käyttäneet vääriin vapauttaan maan päällä eikä muuttaneet kohtaloaan oman vian takia; kuiteskin ne ovat kärsineet tässä elämässä ja kyllä se niille hyvitetään seuraavassas. Tää fiilis ei luota niinkään miehen ansioihin, vaan hyvän ideaan, joka näyttää musta kuuluvan jumalan peruskokoonpanoon. Mä oletan vaan että järjestyssäännöt pysyy voimassa ja että Jumala ei kuseta.
    ellauri115.html on line 697: Hizi tässä on kyllä aika paha omavanhurskauden sivumaku. Mitä tämähän maistuu aivan sonnalta! Sen lisäxi siinä on joku sivumaku! sanoi prikaatinkomentaja maistaestaan miehistölle tarjottua keittoa. Ruoka on hyvää ja sitä on riittävästi, herra eversti, sanoivat alokkaat unisonossa.
    ellauri115.html on line 699: Älä kysy multa kestääkö pahisten kidutuxet ikuisesti, voiko kiltti luoja tuomita ne ikuiselinkautiseen; taaskaan mä en osaa sanoa, eikä mua kyllä kiinostakaan, se on hyödytöntä tietoa. Miten ilkeiden kohtalo koskisi minua? Mähän on selkeästi lampaiden tiimissä. EVVK. Silti mun on vaikea uskoa että niiden rangaistuxet olis iänikuisia. Jos korkein oikeus vaatii kostoa, se vaati sitä tällä puolella. Maailman kansakunnat erroreineen ovat sen toteuttajia. Oikeus käyttää izeaiheutettuja pahoja rangaistaxeen niitä jotka ovat ne ansainneet. Meidän kyllääntymättömissä sieluissa, joita syövät kateus, ahneus ja kunnianhimo, keskellä feikkiä vaurautta, kostavat passiohedelmät saavat ansaitun palkintonsa teidän rikoxista. Ei tässä tarvita mitään helvettiä, se on jo ilkimysten rinnassa.
    ellauri115.html on line 701: Kun meidän ohimenevät tarpeet on ohize, ja meidän hullut halut lepäävät, pitäisi tulla loppu meidän passiohedelmistä ja rikoxista. Voiko puhdas sprii kyetä perversseihin tekoihin? Kun ne ei enää tarvi mitään, mix ne olis enää edes ilkeitä? Jos ne on vapaita meidän karkeista aisteista, jos niiden onni koostuu toisten olioiden kazelusta kuin Kim Young Unilla, ne voi vaan haluta mikä on koreaa; ja se joka lakkaa olemasta pahis ei voi koskaan olla kurjimus. Näin mä ainakin olen taipuvainen ajattelemaan vaikken mä ole ihan hirveesti yrittänyt tulla mihkään johtopäätöxeen. Jumalauta, teidän armonne, hyvä herra, mitä sä päätätkin mä läpytän; jos sä päätät panna pahojen päät ikuiselle pölkylle, olkoon mun puhheeni mitätön; mut jos näiden katuminen ajan mittaan sattuis päättymään, jos niiden kärsimyxet loppuisi, ja jos ne sais saman rauhan kuin minäkin, niin mä kiitän ja kumarran, kiitos siitä oikein kovasti. Eix ilkeäkin ole mun veljeni? Ei kai mun tarvi olla kuonpuoleisessa sen vartija? On munkin monasti tehnyt mieli tehdä niinkuin se. Päästäpä kuule se pahasta ja vapauta se pahasta hengestä; anna sen olla lähes yhtä onnellinen kuin mä; sen onni ei tee mua kateexi, vaan lisää vaan mun omaani.
    ellauri115.html on line 703: Niinpä siis Jumalan silmäilyssä kotipuuhissa, ja sellaisten sen attribuuttien tutkimisessa joihin mua kiinnosti tutustua, mä olen vähitellen älynnyt ja kehittänyt ajatuxen, aluxi osittaisen ja epätäydellisen, jonka mä olen muodostanut tästä Äärettömästä Olennosta. Mut jos siitä on tullut jalompi ja isompi on siitä tullut myös paremmin ihmisjärkeen sopiva. Kun mä lähestyn hengessä ikuista valoa, mä sekaannun ja häikäistyn sen kunniasta, ja mun on pakko ottaa aurinkolasit ja hylätä kaikki maiset käsityxet jotka mä olin siitä muodostanut, niinkuin se valkoinen takatukka ja parta ja mekko ja sandaalit. Tää puhistettu jumala ei enää ole ruumiillinen eikä aistittava; superäly joka hallizee maailmaa ei ole enää ize pelilaudalla; turhaan mä koitan tarrautua sen käsittämättömään vaipanväliin. Kun mä ajattelen että sehän se antaa elämän ja liikkeen elävälle ja liikkuvalle substanssille joka kontrolloi kaikkia eläviä ruumiita; kun mä kuulen sanottavan että mun sielu on spriritististä ja et Jumalakin on sprite, mä kapinoin tollasta jumalallisen esanssin alennusmyyntiä; ikäänkuin Jumala ja mä oltas sukulaisia! Ikäänkuin Jumala ei oliskaan one and only pullollinen Absolute vodkaa, ainoa oikein aktiivinen, tunteva, ajatteleva, tahtova olento, josta me johdetaan omat aatoxemme tunteemme, horisontaaliset liikkeemme, halumme, vapautemme ja suorastaan olemassaolomme! Me ollaan vapaita koska se tahtoo niin, ja tää selittämätön substanssi on meidän sieluille se mitä meidän sielut on meidän ruumiille, eli käynnistysmoottoreita tai dynamoja. Mä en tiedä onxe luonut aineen, ruumiin, sielun ja maailman izensä. Luomisen ajatus sekottaa mun pään ja karkaa mun näpeistä; senverran kun mä pystyn sitä käsittämään mä voin sen uskoakin; mut mä tiedän eze on muotoillut miss universumin ja kaiken mitä sillä on (eikä se olekaan aivan vähän), ja eze on tehnyt kaikki kalut ja järjestyssäännöt niille. Epäilemättä Jumala on ikuinen; mut voix mun mieli kääriytyä ikuisuuden ympärille? [Ei se voi.] Mixmä pettäisin izeäni merkityxettömillä sanoilla? Tävverran mä tajuan; ennenkuin oli kaluja, oli Jumala; se jää olemaan kun kalut loppuvat, ja jos kaikki joskus loppuu niin se kumminkin jää sammuttamaan valoja. Et joku mun käsityskyvyn ylittävä otus panisi alkuun muita otuxia, se on vain vaikeaa kuvitella [eli millä lihaxilla?], mut jos Oleminen ja Eimitään ovat vastakohtia, niin se kuulostaa kyllä ristiriidalta, ihan absurdiahan se on.
    ellauri115.html on line 720: Tässä maailmassa on paljon pahoja miehiä, mutta on vähän näitä kuolleita sieluja [But cf. Gogol op.cit.] jotka jahtaa vaan omaa etua, tunnottomina kaikelle joka on oikein ja hyvin. Me riemuitaan epäoikeudenmukaisuudesta vaan kun se on meidän oman edun mukasta [ditto oikeudenmukaisuudesta; useimmille "epistä" tarkoittaa nimenomaan että on ize jäänyt pitelemään tikkua]; jokaisessa muussa tapauxessa toivotaan että viattomia suojellaan. Jos me nähdään joku väkivallanteko tai epäoikeudenmukaisuus kaupungissa tai maaseudulla, meidän sydämmet liikuttuu heti pohjia myöten välittömästä kiukusta ja vihasta, joka käskee meitä menemään apuun sorretuille [tosin kummat on niitä sorrettuja on ihan kazojan silmässä]; mut meitä hillizee vahvempi velvoite, ja laki ottaa meiltä oikeuden suojella viattomia. Toisaalta, jos joku armon tai avokätisyyden teko sattuu silmään, mitä kunnioitusta ja rakkautta se herättääkään meissä sivustakazojissa! Exme sanota izellemme "mä olisin voinut tehdä ton izekin, muttei sattunut olemaan kukkaro mukana"? Mitä se meille meriteeraa oliko 2000v sitten yx mies oikeassa tai väärässä? ja me luetaan samalla innolla antiikin historia kuin eilisen lehteä. Mitä Catalinan rikoxet on mulle? En mä siitä uhritu. Mixmä sitten kammoxun sen rikoxia ihankuin se tulis tänään telkasta? Me ei vihata pahoja vaan sen takeen mitä ne tekee meille, vaan koska ne on vaan pahoja. Eikä me haluta vaan olla ize onnellisia, vaan me halutaan meidän kaverienkin olevan lähes yhtä onnellisia, eikä tää onni paljon haittaa meidän omaa onnea, jos se on kohtuu pienempi se vaan kasvattaa meidän onnea. Loppuvetona, haluammepa tai emme, me säälitään onnettomia; kun me nähdään niiden kärsivän me kärsitään vähän izekin, ei me niitä mieluusti kazella. Jopa pahimmilla pahixilla on vähän tätä vaistoa, ja se usein johtaa ne ristiriitoihin. Ryöväri joka ryövää turistin, antaa sen liian isot vaatteet köyhille; julmin murhaaja antaa hajusuolaa pyörtyneelle naiselle.
    ellauri115.html on line 722: Miehet puhuvat katumuxen äänestä, piilorikosten salaisesta rangaistuxesta, jonka avulla rikoxet usein paljastuu, tai sitten niillä kerskumisesta. Alas yliminä! Kukapa ei olis kuunnellut kiusaxeen sen kuiskutusta. Puhun kokemuxesta, ja mä mielelläni kuristaisin tän komentelevan tunteen joka aiheuttaa mulle niin paljon kärsimystä. Mutta on toteltava luonnon kuzua ja käytävä kusella kun kusettaa; sä näät että sen ies on keveä ja kun me kuunnellaan tota ääntä meillä on hyvä päänalunen. Pahis pelkää ja juoxee karkuun sitä; se haluis päästä eroon izestään; sen ahistuneet silmät vilkuu ympärille ja ezii jotain viihdettä; ilman katkeraa satiiria ja moukkamaista läpänheittoa se olis aina surullinen; toi ivanauru on sen ainut nautinto. Toisin vanhurskas mies, joka löytää rauhan omista pöxyistään; se on yhtä iloinen yxin kuin seurassa, sen tyydytys ei riipu niistä jotka sitä lähestyy, sen housuihin mahtuu vaikka kuinka monta sellaista.
    ellauri115.html on line 724: Heitä kaze kaikkiin maailman osakuntiin; lue jokainen historianide; keskeltä näitä omituisia ja julmia palvonnan muotoja, näiden hämmästyttävän moninaisten tapojen ja tottumusten joukosta löydät aina samat oikean ja oikeuden ideat; kaikkialla samat moraliteetit, samat hyvän ja pahan ideat. Vanah pakanismi synnytti kauheita jumalia jotka alennettiin sittemmin perkunoixi, jumalat jotka vaan tarjosivat ylimmän onnen kuvana rikoxia tehtävixi ja himoja tyydytettävixi. Mutta turhaan pahe lähti jumalten kämpästä niiden henkkarit mukana; moraalivaisto ei hyväxynyt niitä miehen sydämmeen. Kun Juppiterin rivoiluja juhlittin, Xenokrateen pidätyskykyä kunnioitettiin; siivo Lukretius ihaili häpeämätöntä Venusta; julkea roomalainen uhrasi Pelolle; se kuzui jumalaa joka leikkas isältänsä kikkelin, ja kuoli mukinoitta oman isänsä käsissä. Mitä arvottomimpia jumalia palvoi jaloimmatkin heppulit. [En nyt viizi tässä mennä Barukin mainizemiin puupääjumaliin.] Pyhä luonnonääni oli kuuluvampi kuin jumalien ääni, se voitti kunniasijan maalla ja kaupungissa; se näytti lähettävän syyt ja syylliset yhtä lailla taivaaseen. [Häh?]
    ellauri115.html on line 732: Marcus Atilius Regulus (kuoli mahdollisesti 250 eaa.) oli Rooman tasavallan konsuli ja sotilasjohtaja, joka nähtiin Roomassa sankaruuden esikuvana. Perimätiedon mukaan Regulus pysyi vangittuna Karthagossa kunnes hänet lähetettiin Roomaan neuvottelemaan joko rauhasta tai vankienvaihdosta. Hänen kerrotaan vaatineen senaattia kieltäytymään Karthagon ehdotuksista, minkä jälkeen hän noudattaakseen vapauttamisensa ehtoja palasi vankeuteen Karthagoon huolimatta roomalaisten vastustuksesta. Hänen vangitsijoidensa kerrotaan nopeasti kiduttaneen hänet kuoliaaksi. Reguluksen toiminta nähtiin osoituksena sankarillisesta kestävyydestä. Paras aikakautta käsittelevä säilynyt lähde, kreikkalainen historioitsija Polybios (n. 203–118 eaa.) ei mainitse Reguluksen kuolemaan liittyvistä tapahtumista, mutta se mainitaan vuonna 129 eaa. konsulina toimineen Gaius Sempronius Tuditanuksen fragmenteissa. Jotkut historiantutkijat ovat arvelleet, että kertomus Reguluksen kiduttamisesta olisi keksitty puolustamaan sitä, että Diodoros Siculuxen mukaan roomalaiset kiduttivat kahta karthagolaista sotavankia Reguluksen lesken käskystä.
    ellauri115.html on line 809: as Pindar​ says, a man would profit in no moderate degree by venting these emotions upon his enemies, and turning the course of such discharges,​ so to speak, as far away from his associates and relatives.
    ellauri115.html on line 811: What is to hinder a man from taking his enemy as his teacher without fee, and profiting thereby, and thus learning, to some extent, the things of which he was unaware? For there are many things which an enemy is quicker to perceive than a friend (for Love is blind regarding the loved one, as Plato​ says), and inherent in hatred, along with curiosity, is the inability to hold one´s tongue.
    ellauri115.html on line 812: Hiero​ was reviled by one of his enemies for his offensive breath; so when he went home he said to his wife, "What do you mean? Even you never told me of this." But she being virtuous and innocent said, "I supposed that all men smelt so."
    ellauri115.html on line 816: Conversely, Socrates bore with Xanthippe,​ who was irascible and acrimonious, for he thought that he should have no difficulty in getting along with other people if he accustomed himself to bear patiently with her; but it is much better to secure this training from the scurrilous, angry, scoffing, and abusive attacks of enemies and outsiders, and thus accustom the temper to be unruffled and not even impatient in the midst of reviling.
    ellauri115.html on line 836: At another time Racine took La Fontaine to church, and gave him a Bible, which he opened at the prayer of the Jews in Baruch; becoming interested in the book, which he had perhaps never opened before, he asked his friend, “Who was this Baruch? He was a fine genius!” For some time afterwards his salutation to friends was, “Have you read Baruch?”—LAROUSSE: Fleurs Historiques.
    ellauri115.html on line 838: His attachment to his friends, says a biographer, was that of a dog to a master. When Mme. de Sablière, who gave the improvident fabulist a home for twenty years, was asked what she had saved from a financial disaster, she replied, “I only kept my dog and cat, and La Fontaine.”
    ellauri115.html on line 934: The ideas of Socinianism date from the wing of the Protestant Reformation known as the Radical Reformation and have their root in the Italian Anabaptist movement of the 1540s, such as the anti-trinitarian Council of Venice in 1550. Lelio Sozzini was the first of the Italian anti-trinitarians to go beyond Arian beliefs in print and deny the pre-existence of Christ in his Brevis explicatio in primum Johannis caput – a commentary on the meaning of the Logos in John 1:1–15 (1562). Lelio Sozzini considered that the "beginning" of John 1:1 was the same as 1 John 1:1 and referred to the new creation,[citation needed] not the Genesis creation. His nephew Fausto Sozzini published his own longer Brevis explicatio later, developing his uncle's arguments. Many years after his death in Switzerland, Sozzini consulted with the Unitarian Church in Transylvania, attempting to mediate in the dispute between Frankenstein and Count Dracula.
    ellauri115.html on line 936: He moved to Poland, where he married the daughter of a leading member of the Polish Brethren, the anti-trinitarian minority, or ecclesia minor. In 1565, it had split from the Calvinist Reformed Church in Poland. Sozzini never joined the ecclesia minor, but he was influential in reconciling several controversies among the Brethren: on conscientious objection, on prayer to Christ, and on the virgin birth. Fausto persuaded many in the Polish Brethren who were formerly Arian, such as Marcin Czechowic, to adopt his uncle Lelio's views.
    ellauri115.html on line 938: Fausto Sozzini furthered his influence through his Racovian Catechism, published posthumously, which set out his uncle Lelio's views on Christology and replaced earlier catechisms of the Ecclesia Minor. His influence continued after his death through the writings of his students published in Polish and Latin from the press of the Racovian Academy at Raków, Kielce County.
    ellauri115.html on line 942: In Britain and North America, Socinianism later became a catch-all term for any kind of dissenting belief. Sources in the 18th and 19th centuries frequently attributed the term Socinian anachronistically, using it to refer to ideas that embraced a much wider range than the narrowly defined position of the Racovian catechisms and library.
    ellauri115.html on line 946: The most distinctive element in Socinian, as opposed to Arian, Christology is the rejection of the personal pre-existence of Christ. The theme of Christ's preexistence occurs repeatedly in the Racovian Catechism, with detailed discussion of disputed verses, such as:
    ellauri115.html on line 960: The Racovian Catechism makes muted reference to the devil in seven places which prompts the 1818 translator Thomas Rees, to footnote references to the works of Hugh Farmer (1761) and John Simpson (1804). Yet these references are in keeping with the somewhat subdued handling of the devil in the Biblioteca Fratrum Polonorum. The Collegia Vicentina at Vicenza (1546) had questioned not only the existence of the devil but even of angels. Word has it that the personal boll weevil was none other than Sozzini himself.
    ellauri115.html on line 962: Kun d’Alembert syytti Geneven pastoreita sosinianismista. Rousseau piti niiden puolta. “Socinianism was a Christian sect closely allied with the development of Unitarianism. It took its name from its founder, Fausto Sozino, an Italian of the sixteenth century who lived in Poland for a long time, where his movement had great strength. It was popular throughout Europe and was accepted by many Protestant churches. Socinianism was anti-trinitarian and held that reason is the sole and final authority in the interpretation of the scripture. It further denied eternal punishments. Calvin had condemned the doctrine, so that the imputation in d’Alembert’s article was both a daring interpretation of the doctrine of Geneva’s pastors and one which was likely to be dangerous for them.” Allan Bloom, Politics and the Arts (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1960) 150. (back)
    ellauri115.html on line 1075: Vaknin was born in Kiryat Yam, Israel, the eldest of five children born to Sephardi Jewish immigrants. Vaknin's mother was from Turkey, and his father, a construction worker, was from Morocco. He describes a difficult childhood, in which he writes that his parents "were ill-equipped to deal with normal children, let alone the gifted". Arvaa kyllä ketä sillä tarkoitetaan.
    ellauri115.html on line 1077: It was in the mid-1980s that he became aware of difficulties in his relationship with his fiancée, and that he had mood swings. In 1985 he sought help from a psychiatrist, who diagnosed him with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Vaknin did not accept the diagnosis at the time. From 1986 to 1987 he was the general manager of IPE Ltd. in London. He moved back to Israel, where he became director of an Israeli investment firm, Mikbatz Teshua. He was also president of the Israeli chapter of the Unification Church's Professors for World Peace Academy.
    ellauri115.html on line 1079: In Israel in 1995 he was found guilty on three counts of securities fraud along with two other men, Nissim Avioz and Dov Landau. He was sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment and fined 50,000 shekels (about $14,000), while the company was fined 100,000 shekels. In 1996, as a condition of parole, he agreed to a mental health evaluation, which noted various personality disorders. According to Vaknin, "I was borderline schizoid, but the most dominant was NPD," and on this occasion he accepted the diagnosis, because, he wrote, "it was a relief to know what I had, besides the loot."
    ellauri115.html on line 1087: A model of quantised time was proposed by Vaknin in his 1982 Ph.D. dissertation, titled "Time Asymmetry Revisited". The dissertation was published by Pacific Western University (California). "Events" are perturbations in the Time Field and they are distinct from chronon interactions.
    ellauri115.html on line 1089: In his view, narcissists have lost their "true self", the core of their personality, which has been replaced by delusions of grandeur, a "false self". Therefore, he believes, they cannot be healed, because they do not exist as real persons, only as reflections: "The False Self replaces the narcissist's True Self and is intended to shield him from hurt and narcissistic injury by self-imputing omnipotence ... The narcissist pretends that his False Self is real and demands that others affirm this confabulation," meanwhile keeping his real-life imperfect true self under wraps.
    ellauri115.html on line 1105: Shmuelin website on säälittävä. This Website is sponsored by the Publisher:
    ellauri115.html on line 1121: Robert D. Jänis CM (born 1934) is a Canadian psychologist, known for his research in the field of criminal psychology. He is a psychopath emeritus of the University of British Columbia, where his studies center on psychopathology and psychophysiognomy.
    ellauri115.html on line 1124: Hare was born in 1934 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Hare's father was a roofing contractor and his mother was of French Canadian descent. He grew up in a working-class neighborhood of Calgary. This explains a lot.
    ellauri115.html on line 1128: The Hares moved to the USA to study for a PhD program in psychophysiognomy at the University of Oregon, but due to his daughter falling ill (as expected) the family returned to Canada. Hare then served as a psycho in the prison system in British Columbia (British Columbia Penitentiary) for eight months, an area in which he had no particular qualification or training; indeed he would later recount without pangs of conscience that some prisoners were able to manipulate him more than he could them.
    ellauri115.html on line 1132: Hare then returned to Vancouver, British Columbia, shut up as a professional psychopath at the prison's psychologist compartment, where he would stay for 30 years until retirement, the same prison he had previously worked in. He seemed not to change behavior in response to God's punishment because he was a psychopath. He recalls, "I happened to get into a cell that nobody else was sitting in". Hare has said of himself and his wife Averil that the loss of their daughter Cheryl in 2003 "tells an awful lot about who Averil and I are." Averil, his wife, is a prominent social worker in Canada specializing in child abuse.
    ellauri115.html on line 1136: Hare also co-authored the bestselling Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work (2006) with organizational psychologist and human resources consultant Paul Babiak, a portrayal of the disruptions caused when psychopaths enter the workplace. The book focuses on what Hare refers to as the "successful psychopath", who can be charming and socially skilled and therefore able to get by in the workplace. This is by contrast with the type of psychopath whose lack of social skills or self-control would cause them to rely on threats and coercion and who would probably not be able to hold down a job for long. Hare would classify himself and Mrs. Hare (jänisemo pyrynä viitaan loikki) as first class psychopaths. Successful vs. unsuccessful bad people.
    ellauri115.html on line 1138: Hare appeared in the 2003/4 award-winning documentary film The Corporation, discussing whether his criteria for psychopathy could be said to apply to modern business as a legal personality, appearing to conclude that many of them would apply by definition. However, in a 2007 edition of Snakes in Suits, Hare contends that the filmmakers took his remarks out of context and that he does not believe all corporations would meet all the necessary criteria in practice.
    ellauri115.html on line 1170: A: The answer to this is very simple. Utilitarianism is concerned only with the volume of pleasure and pain, and Nietzsche says in so many words that as soon as you even enter into this kind of thinking, you are already deep into the territory of nihilism. It is passive; concerned with maintenance, not construction; aloof or indifferent to meaning, something to justify the effort in the first place, even when it is successful, let alone when it isn’t. It is the staid, kindly, sober—not to say, the British—version of the same imbecilic nihilism that was prevailing on the continent in the same era. Mill did not understand the difference between pleasure and (actual) happiness, between pain and suffering, between real (spiritual) slavery and freedom.
    ellauri115.html on line 1206:

    Nahistunut N.


    ellauri117.html on line 86: Mutta jos äidit suvaitsevat itse ruveta lapsiaan imettämään, niin tavat paranevat itsestään, ja luonnonmukaiset tunteet heräävät kaikissa sydämissä; valtion asukasluku on karttuva; tämä ensimäinen seuraus, tämä ainoa seuraus on liittävä kaikki sopusuhtaiseksi kokonaisuudeksi. Kotielämän tarjoama viehätys on paras vastamyrkky huonoille tavoille. Lasten meluavat leikit ja heidän aiheuttamansa vaivannäkö, joita alussa pidetään häiritsevinä, muuttuvat miellyttäviksi; ne saattavat isän ja äidin toisilleen tarpeellisemmiksi, rakkaammiksi, ne lujittavat aviollisia siteitä. Kun kotielämä on vilkas ja iloinen, silloin kotoiset huolenpidot ovat vaimon rakkain tehtävä ja miehen viehkein huvitus. Näin siis tämän ainoan epäkohdan korjaamisesta seuraisi yleinen parannustila ja luonto olisi pian palauttanut kaikki oikeutensa. Niin pian kuin naisista taas on tullut äitejä, niin kohta miehistä tulee isiä ja puolisoja.
    ellauri117.html on line 138:
    Jättetöntig historia: blabla min syster, blabla min kusin, blabla trollkarl.

    ellauri117.html on line 160: Man sagt, daß Kafka seine erste sexuelle "Begegnung" mit seiner französischen Gouvernante hatte, doch hat er diskreterweise immer nur in Andeutungen über dieses «Urerlebnis» gesprochen. Den ersten regen Geschlechtsverkehr hatte er als Zwanzigjähriger mit einer tschechischen Verkäuferin. Sie verbrachten einen Abend in einer billigen Absteige. Diese Erfahrung bestärkte Kafka in seinem Ekel vor dem Geschlechtsverkehr und in seinem Glauben, daß Sexualität eine von Natur aus schmutzige, nichtswürdige Anlegenheit sei. Gerade das Entgegengesetzte predigte D.H.Lawrence (infra). Trotzdem streunte er seine ganze Studentenzeit indurch immer wieder durch das Bordellviertel von Prag, genau wie die anderen Heißsporne unter seinen Kommilitonen. Er ekelte sich vor seiner eigenen sexuellen Lust, erkannte aber zugleich auch die Notwendigkeit, ihr hin und wieder einzustecken:
    ellauri117.html on line 168: 1919 begegnete er während eines Aufenthalts in einer Pension in der Nähe von Prag Julie Wohryzek, der Tochter eines tschechischen Schuhmachers. Sie wurde seine zweite Verlobte. Im Gegensatz zu Felice hatte Julies Familie weder Besitz noch Ansehen, un Kafkas Vater bemerkte mit beißendem Spott, daß sein Sohn wohl besser beraten wäre, wenn er ein Bordell besuchen würde. Die etwa dreißig Jahre alte Julie war eine unbekümmerte, unge gebildete Frohnatur. Kafka sah in ihr die ideale Partnerin für eine zuträgliche, vernünftige Ehe. Doch auch diese Verlobung wurde aufgelöst - angeblich weil das Paar das Loch nicht finden konnte, in Wahrheit eine der zwanghaften Befürchtungen, die Frans Beziehungen zu Frauen stets überschatteten.
    ellauri117.html on line 170: In 1920, als er sich wieder auf einer Erholungskur in Südtirol befand, begann er einer Frau zu schreiben, die ihm geistig ebenbürtig war. Sie hieß Milena Jesenská-Polak, war 24 Jahre alt, verheiratet und keine Jüdin. Sie war eine emanzipierte Frau, Künstlerin und Intellektuelle, die Kafka gebeten hatte, einige seiner Werke ins Tschechische übersetzen zu dürfen. Sie vergötterte Kafka als Schriftsteller und konnte sich in seine seelische Welt einfühlen, denn auch sie hatte unter einem tyrannischen Vater zu leiden gehabt. Kafka bot ihr finanzielle Unterstützung an, wenn sie ihren Ehemann verließe. Vor ihrer endgültigen Entscheidung verbrachten die beiden jedoch vier Tage lang «Probeflitterwochen». Nach ihrer Rückkehr schlug Milena das Angebot aus. Ihr war schnell klargeworden, was es bedeutete, mit einem dem Tod geweihten
    ellauri117.html on line 185: Apparently his wife Frieda believed him to have had a sexual relationship with a farmer while writing Women in Love in 1916. There's also the coal miner quote you mentioned Kelby. Then there's the quote: I should like to know why nearly every man that approaches greatness tends to homosexuality, whether he admits it or not... (Älkää yrittäkökään! Mä en ole! Sitäpaizi mä en ole lähelläkään suuruutta! Pienenen kuin pyy maailmanlopun edellä.)
    ellauri117.html on line 190: I left myself quite limply in his hands, and, to get a better grip of me, he put his arm round me and pressed me against him, and the sweetness of the touch of our naked bodies one against the other was superb. It satistied in some measure the vague indecipherable yearning of my soul; and it was the same with him. When he had rubbed me all warm, he let me go, and we lo0ked at each other with eyes of
    ellauri117.html on line 210: The man went. Gerald turned to Birkin with his eyes lighted.
    ellauri117.html on line 239: Gerald fastened the door and pushed the furniture aside. The room was large, there was plenty of space, it was thickly carpeted. Then he quickly threw off his clothes, and waited for Birkin. The latter, white and thin, came over to him. Birkin was more a presence than a visible object, Gerald was aware of him completely, but not really visually. Whereas Gerald himself was concrete and noticeable, a piece of pure final substance.
    ellauri117.html on line 241: `Now,' said Birkin, `I will show you what I learned, and what I remember. You let me take you so --' And his hands closed on the naked body of the other man. In another moment, he had Gerald swung over lightly and balanced against his knee, head downwards. Relaxed, Gerald sprang to his feet with eyes glittering.
    ellauri117.html on line 245: So the two men began to struggle together. They were very dissimilar. Birkin was tall and narrow, his bones were very thin and fine. Gerald was much heavier and more plastic. His bones were strong and round, his limbs were rounded, all his contours were beautifully and fully moulded. He seemed to stand with a proper, rich weight on the face of the earth, whilst Birkin seemed to have the centre of gravitation in his own middle. And Gerald had a rich, frictional kind of strength, rather mechanical, but sudden and invincible, whereas Birkin was abstract as to be almost intangible. He impinged invisibly upon the other man, scarcely seeming to touch him, like a garment, and then suddenly piercing in a tense fine grip that seemed to penetrate into the very quick of Gerald´s being.
    ellauri117.html on line 249: So the two men entwined and wrestled with each other, working nearer and nearer. Both were white and clear, but Gerald flushed smart red where he was touched, and Birkin remained white and tense. He seemed to penetrate into Gerald´s more solid, more diffuse bulk, to interfuse his body through the body of the other, as if to bring it subtly into subjection, always seizing with some rapid necromantic fore-knowledge every motion of the other flesh, converting and counteracting it, playing upon the limbs and trunk of Gerald like some hard wind. It was as if Birkin´s whole physical intelligence interpenetrated into Gerald´s body, as if his fine, sublimated energy entered into the flesh of the fuller man, like some potency, casting a fine net, a prison, through the muscles into the very depths of Gerald´s physical being.
    ellauri117.html on line 253: At length Gerald lay back inert on the carpet, his breast rising in great slow panting, whilst Birkin kneeled over him, almost unconscious. Birkin was much more exhausted. He caught little, short breaths, he could scarcely breathe any more. The earth seemed to tilt and sway, and a complete darkness was coming over his mind. He did not know what happened. He slid forward quite unconscious, over Gerald, and Gerald did not notice. Then he was half-conscious again, aware only of the strange tilting and sliding of the world. The world was sliding, everything was sliding off into the darkness. And he was sliding, endlessly, endlessly away.
    ellauri117.html on line 255: He came to consciousness again, hearing an immense knocking outside. What could be happening, what was it, the great hammer-stroke resounding through the house? He did not know. And then it came to him that it was his own heart beating. But that seemed impossible, the noise was outside. No, it was inside himself, it was his own heart. And the beating was painful, so strained, surcharged. He wondered if Gerald heard it. He did not know whether he were standing or lying or falling.
    ellauri117.html on line 257: When he realised that he had fallen prostrate upon Gerald´s body he wondered, he was surprised. But he sat up, steadying himself with his hand and waiting for his heart to become stiller and less painful. It hurt very much, and took away his consciousness.
    ellauri117.html on line 263: Birkin heard the sound as if his own spirit stood behind him, outside him, and listened to it. His body was in a trance of exhaustion, his spirit heard thinly. His body could not answer. Only he knew his heart was getting quieter. He was divided entirely between his spirit, which stood outside, and knew, and his body, that was a plunging, unconscious stroke of blood.
    ellauri117.html on line 267: `Yes,' said Birkin, hardening his throat and producing the words in the tension there, `you're much stronger than I -- you could beat me -- easily.'
    ellauri117.html on line 269: Then he relaxed again to the terrible plunging of his heart and his blood.
    ellauri117.html on line 275: He still heard as if it were his own disembodied spirit hearing, standing at some distance behind him. It drew nearer however, his spirit. And the violent striking of blood in his chest was sinking quieter, allowing his mind to come back. He realised that he was leaning with all his weight on the soft body of the other man. It startled him, because he thought he had withdrawn. He recovered himself, and sat up. But he was still vague and unestablished. He put out his hand to steady himself. It touched the hand of Gerald, that was lying out on the floor. And Gerald's hand closed warm and sudden over Birkin's, they remained exhausted and breathless, the one hand clasped closely over the other. It was Birkin whose hand, in swift response, had closed in a strong, warm clasp over the hand of the other. Gerald´s clasp had been sudden and momentaneous.
    ellauri117.html on line 277: The normal consciousness however was returning, ebbing back. Birkin could breathe almost naturally again. Gerald´s hand slowly withdrew, Birkin slowly, dazedly rose to his feet and went towards the table. He poured out a whiskey and soda. Gerald also came for a drink.
    ellauri117.html on line 294: `Certainly it is,' said Gerald. Then he laughed pleasantly, adding: `It's rather wonderful to me.' He stretched out his arms handsomely.
    ellauri117.html on line 304: `You think I am beautiful -- how do you mean, physically?' asked Gerald, his eyes glistening.
    ellauri117.html on line 308: Gerald laughed in his throat, and said:
    ellauri117.html on line 310: `That's certainly one way of looking at it. I can say this much, I feel better. It has certainly helped me. Is this the Bruderschaft you wanted?'
    ellauri117.html on line 312: `Perhaps. Do you think this pledges anything?'
    ellauri117.html on line 326: `No? There you are, we are not alike. I'll put a dressing-gown on.' Birkin remained alone, looking at the fire. His mind had reverted to Ursula. She seemed to return again into his consciousness. Gerald came down wearing a gown of broad-barred, thick black-and-green silk, brilliant and striking.
    ellauri117.html on line 334: Birkin was silent, thinking how scrupulous Gerald was in his attire, how expensive too. He wore silk socks, and studs of fine workmanship, and silk underclothing, and silk braces. Curious! This was another of the differences between them. Birkin was careless and unimaginative about his own appearance.
    ellauri117.html on line 338: Birkin laughed. He was looking at the handsome figure of the other man, blond and comely in the rich robe, and he was half thinking of the difference between it and himself -- so different; as far, perhaps, apart as man from woman, yet in another direction. But really it was Ursula, it was the woman who was gaining ascendance over Birkin´s being, at this moment. Gerald was becoming limp again, lapsing out of him.
    ellauri117.html on line 396: Accept you will not be paid tens of thousands of dollars for short story. Accept it will not have an audience measured in millions. Accept it will not be hotly debated on internet forums. Welcome possibility it will be an infinitesimally small thing. Understand that this is what makes it pure.
    ellauri117.html on line 398: Tom Bissell was born in Escanaba, Michigan, in 1974. His short fiction has won two Pushcart Prizes and has been published in multiple editions of The Best American Series. He has also written eight works of nonfiction, including Apostle and (with Greg Sestero) The Disaster Artist, as well as many screenplays for video games and television. Bissell lives in Los Angeles with his family. Tom Bister is a sad case. Another Gold Hat of Hyvinkää.
    ellauri117.html on line 475: A man was sitting on the edge of a bed watching his wife.

    ellauri117.html on line 478: An elderly man owned his farm in Louisiana.

    ellauri117.html on line 497: A preacher was making his rounds to parishioners with a bicycle.

    ellauri117.html on line 554: The Adrenal body type is governed by the hormone cortisol, which is responsible for putting on weight in the stomach and back. These people tend to have round faces, and find it almost impossible to lose weight in their mid-section no matter how much dieting or working out they do. This is because the weight is caused by a hormone that is actively utilizing proteins and fats in the lower legs, and storing it in the mid-center.
    ellauri117.html on line 561: The Ovary body type is governed by the imbalances in estrogen production. This explains why men do not have the Ovary body type.
    ellauri117.html on line 608: Maxa-Shaftesburyn (1621-1683) pojanpoika, 3. Earl of Shaftesbury (1671—1713) oli mieltä että: Hobbes had set the agenda of British moral philosophy (a search for the grounding of universal moral principles), and Locke had established its method (empiricism). Shaftesbury’s important contribution was to focus that agenda by showing what a satisfactory response to Hobbes might look like but without giving up too much of Locke’s method. Shaftesbury showed the British moralists that if we think of moral goodness as analogous to beauty, then (even within a broadly empiricist framework) it is still possible for moral goodness to be non-arbitrarily grounded in objective features of the world and for the moral agent to be attracted to virtue for its own sake, not merely out of self-interest. In Shaftesbury’s aesthetic language, the state of having the morally correct motives is the state of being “morally beautiful,” and the state of approving the morally correct motives upon reflection is the state of having “good moral taste.” Shaftesbury argues that the morally correct motives which constitute moral beauty turn out to be those motives which are aimed at the good of one’s society as a whole. This good is understood teleologically. Furthermore Shaftesbury argues that both the ability to know the good of one’s society and the reflective approval of the motivation toward this good are innate capacities which must nevertheless be developed by proper socialization.
    ellauri117.html on line 610: John Locke (1632-1704) was a close friend of the First Earl and an advisor to the family for years to come after the First Earl’s death. Locke was the personal physician and general advisor to the First Earl. He supervised the childhood medical care of Shaftesbury’s father, the degenerate Second Earl (1652-1699). He also helped find a wife for the Second Earl and he cared for her during her pregnancy with the Third Earl. Most significantly for our purposes, Locke supervised the Third Earl’s education. He personally chose Shaftesbury’s governess Elizabeth Birch and designed a curriculum for her to follow in her instruction of the child. This experience was, presumably, the basis for Locke’s later work Thoughts Concerning Education. Under Birch’s tutelage, Shaftesbury received a strong education in the Classics and became fluent in Greek and Latin by the age of eleven. Locke continued to check on Shaftesbury’s progress over the years. Locke served as a primary advisor to the young Shaftesbury, though Shaftesbury did not always follow Locke’s advice. Shaftesbury had many "philosophical" conversations with Locke, some of which are preserved in correspondence. "Mautonta!" huusi 3. Shaftersburyn Jaarli vähän väliä.
    ellauri117.html on line 622: Locke stated his belief, in his Second Treatise, that nature on its own provides little of value to society, implying that the labour expended in the creation of goods gives them their value. From this premise, understood as a labour theory of value, Locke developed a labour theory of property, whereby ownership of property is created by the application of labour. In addition, he believed that property precedes government and government cannot "dispose of the estates of the subjects arbitrarily." Fucking capitalist. Karl Marx later critiqued Locke's theory of property in his own social theory.
    ellauri117.html on line 627: Locken läheinen ystävä Lady Masham kutsui hänet vuonna 1691 Sir Francis Mashamin maatilalle Essexiin. Locke vietti siellä viimeiset vuotensa vaihtelevassa terveydentilassa kärsien välillä astmakohtauksista. Hänestä oli kuitenkin tullut whig-puolueen älyllinen sankari. Noihin aikoihin Locke kävi keskusteluja eri asioista muun muassa John Drydenin ja Isaac Newtonin kanssa. Like 'This asthma will be the death of me.' 'Please pass the piece of liver if you're done with it Isaac.'
    ellauri117.html on line 629: Locke kuoli vuonna 1704 pitkällisen sairauden jälkeen. Hänet on haudattu High Laverin kylän kirkkomaalle, Harlowin itäpuolelle, Essexiin. Some scholars have seen Locke's political convictions as being based from his religious beliefs. Locke's religious trajectory began in Calvinist trinitarianism, but by the time of the Reflections (1695) Locke was advocating not just Socinian views on tolerance but also Socinian Christology. Täähän Sozzini oli Rusakonkin guru.
    ellauri117.html on line 633: And this is the plan: At the right time he will bring everything together under the authority of Christ—everything in heaven and on earth.
    ellauri117.html on line 635: is markedly different from that of Socinians like Biddle, and may indicate that near the end of his life Locke returned nearer to an Arian position, thereby accepting Christ's pre-existence.


    ellauri117.html on line 661: There are always things that might suggest Mr. Locke was gay, such as his being a lifetime bachelor, having no children, and having a life that was surrounded by philosophical men, there is nothing that would give substance to said rumor. You might want to read Locke’s Fundamental Constitution of the Carolinas (1669) which was co-authored by The First Earl of Shaftesbury. It is rather draconian and clearly deviates from the principles of Locke’s more famous two Treatises. It is a matter of scholarly debate just how much Locke contributed to the positions on slavery in this document. Locke was also a good counter-voice to Rousseau in terms of perhaps a more individualistic bent, whereas Rousseau’s philosophy was more collectivist. I think if you look to the Preamble to the US Constitution you can see the influence of both, although the Bill of Rights has a much more individualist orientation.
    ellauri117.html on line 668: Countdown to John’s next birthday: John Locke is a Virgo and his 389th birthday is in 244 days.
    ellauri117.html on line 670: John Locke was born in 1630s. John Locke is part of G.I. Generation also known as The Greatest Generation. This generation experienced much of their youth during the Great Depression and rapid technological innovation such as the radio and the telephone. The initials "G.I." is military terminology referring to "Government Issue" or "General Issue". It's hard to know John Locke birth time, but we do know his mother gave birth to his on a Sunday. People born on a Sunday can often rely on sympathy from others and generally have luck on their side.
    ellauri117.html on line 672: John’s Education details are not available at this time. Please check back soon for updates. John Locke’s mother’s name is unknown at this time and his father’s name is under review. We will continue to update information on John Locke’s parents. Associated with: Dario Sztajnszrajber, Philosopher. Camilo Prieto, Philosopher. Helio Couto, Philosopher.
    ellauri117.html on line 674: Like many famous people and celebrities, John Locke keeps His personal life private. Once more details are available on who he is dating, we will update this section. The 388-year-old Not available was born in the G.I. Generation and the Year of the Monkey.
    ellauri117.html on line 689: Zodiac Sign: John Locke is a Virgo. People of this zodiac sign like animals, healthy food, nature, cleanliness, and dislike rudeness and asking for help. The strengths of this sign are being loyal, analytical, kind, hardworking, practical, while weaknesses can be shyness, overly critical of self and others, all work and no play. The greatest overall compatibility with Virgo is Pisces and Cancer.
    ellauri117.html on line 691: Chinese Zodiac: John Locke was born in the Year of the Ox. People born under this sign love to make people laugh and are generally energetic and upbeat but sometimes lack self-control.
    ellauri118.html on line 65: 21.6.2021 klo 13.31 - Bo Egov: Rauhis on maalattu lukuunottamatta lyhtyä plus toista maalia vaativat paikat

    ellauri118.html on line 132: This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more. Got it! fi.desertanglican.org. Saisiko olla kexejä? Saisiko olla veiziä? Tättilillukka! Ajetaan autolla pitkälle!
    ellauri118.html on line 210: Mitä tytöt pitävät miehistä?
    ellauri118.html on line 328: Draw down thy cataracts of gold; Vedä kaihisi kullasta;
    ellauri118.html on line 377: Slap! Fucking mosquitoes. This time round Läis! Vitun hyttyset. Tällä kertaa
    ellauri118.html on line 384: After graduating from high school, Cawein worked in a pool hall in Louisville as a cashier in Waddill´s New-market, which also served as a gambling house. He worked there for six years, saving his pay so he could return home to write.
    ellauri118.html on line 386: His output was thirty-six books and 1,500 poems. [I got more than 2000 by now! Well most of mine are prose, to be honest.] His writing presented Kentucky scenes in a language echoing Percy Bysshe Shelley and John Keats. He soon earned the nickname the "Keats of Kentucky". He was popular enough that, by 1900, he told the Louisville Courier-Journal that his income from publishing poetry in magazines amounted to about $100 a month.
    ellauri118.html on line 388: In 1912 Cawein was forced to sell his Old Louisville home, St James Court (a 2+1⁄2-story brick house built in 1901, which he had purchased in 1907), as well as some of his library, after losing money in the 1912 stock market crash. In 1914 the Authors Club of New York City placed him on their relief list. He died on December 8 later that year and was buried in Cave Hill Cemetery. Shouldn´t have speculated but on his own pen and paper.
    ellauri118.html on line 410: 1Aviorikos kirjallisena topoksena on ollut useankin tutkimuksen aiheena, mutta ei yhdenkään narratologisen tutkimuksen. Edelleen painavin kirjallisuustieteellinen esitys aiheesta on Tony Tannerin ambivalentin psykoanalyyttis-strukturalistinen Adultery in the Novel (1979), joka lähestyy aviorikosta sekä yhteiskunnallisena että kirjallis-kielellisenä transgressiona. Viittaan Tannerin tutkimukseen Rouva Bovarya käsittelevässä luvussa. Muut laajemmat esitykset kirjallisesta aviorikoksesta ovat tekstianalyyttisesti merkityksettömämpiä: Bill Overtonin Fictions of Female Adultery (2002) keskittyy aviorikoskirjallisuuden historiallisiin ja kulttuurisiin reunaehtoihin sekä soimaa aiempaa tutkimusta (lähinnä Tanneria) liiasta kieli- ja kerrontakeskeisyydestä; Patricia Mainardin Husbands, Wives, and Lovers (2003) on kulttuurihistoriallinen esitys aviorikoksesta taiteessa ja Overtonin tutkimusta rikkaampi esitys esimerkiksi aviorikoksen lainsäädännöllisistä ja kulttuurisista kytköksistä; niin ikään Judith Armstrongin The Novel of Adultery (1976), Naomi Segalin The Adulteress’s Child (1992) ja Maria R. Ripponin Judgement and Justification in the Nineteenth-Century Novel of Adultery (2002) sivuuttavat kerronnan kysymykset ja keskittyvät kulttuuris-poliittiseen kontekstiin ja pelkästään referentiaalisen tason temaattiseen toistoon (kuten siihen että aviorikoksesta syntyvä lapsi on mitä todennäköisimmin tyttö). Oma lukunsa ovat vielä tiettyihin aikakausiin ja kielialueisiin (esimerkiksi ranskalaiseen hoviromantiikkaan) keskittyvät tutkimukset. Näistä maininnan arvoinen on ainakin Donald J. Greinerin Adultery in the American Novel (1985), vertaileva tutkimus Updiken, Hawthornen ja Jamesin avionrikkojista. Kulttuuri- ja myyttihistoriallinen klassikko, Denis de Rougemontin L’Amour et l’Occident (1939) on myös tutkimus uskottomuusfiktioista (Tristanin ja Isolden perillisistä), sillä Rougemontilla juuri aviorikos on länsimaisen ”rakkauden rakastamisen” huipentuma, transgressiivinen olotila joka katoaa, jos siitä tehdään instituutio. Käsitys uskottomuudesta kulttuurisena rajailmiönä ja juuri siitä syystä kertomustaiteen pulppuavana lähteenä yhdistää siis Rougemontia ja Tanneria, mutta jostain syystä Tanner ei viittaa Rougemontin teokseen. Mixihän? [Heitän tähän heti sen edellä mainitun oivalluxen, että romantiikka on sitä kun panettaa muttei pääse pukille.]
    ellauri118.html on line 416: on kertomuksen tapahtumat (”histoire”); henkilöhahmot toteuttavat nämä tapahtumat” (Bal 1981, 45). Analyysi ois kai niinkö texti textinä ja tulkinta niinkö mitä tästä opimme. Syntaxi ja semantiikka.
    ellauri118.html on line 432: Monika Fludernik (1957-) ist´ne österreichische Flugwirtin, Amerikanistin und Literaturwissenschaftlerin. Fludernik leistete wichtige Beiträge zur Erzähltheorie. Die neuere Erzähltheorie wurde ab 1915 in Ansätzen vom Russischen Formalismus entwickelt und vom Strukturalismus seit den 1950er Jahren weiter ausgearbeitet, wobei Tzvetan Todorov zu den wichtigsten Vermittlern der formalistischen Ansätze in Frankreich gehörte. Der hier entwickelte strukturalistische Ansatz – mit späteren Ergänzungen – ist bis heute maßgeblich, es gab jedoch nie eine einheitliche strukturalistische Erzähltheorie. Wichtige Theoretiker der Narratologie sind Gérard Genette, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roland Barthes, Roman Jakobson und Paul Ricœur. Die strukturelle (formalistische) Erzähltheorie wird oft durch interdisziplinäre Ansätze ergänzt, so durch die Semiotik ergänzt, wozu insbesondere Juri Lotman beigetragen hat. Im deutschen Sprachraum war Franz Karl Stanzel der erste Vertreter der Erzähltheorie.
    ellauri118.html on line 434: Die traditionelle Erzähltheorie, vertreten durch Franz Karl Stanzel, Gérard Genette, Seymour Chatman u. a. m, beschäftigt sich mit Elementen des „discours“ („Erzählweise“). Andere Theoretiker nehmen eher die Strukturen der „histoire“ („Erzählinhalt“) in den Blick. Damit bauen sich (erzählerische) Handlungen in dem vorgestellten Begriffsinventar aus Geschehnissen und Ereignissen auf. Während der Begriff „Handlung“ im deutschsprachigen Raum verwendet wird, wird sie etwa bei Genette als histoire und in der anglo-amerikanischen Erzähltheorie als story bezeichnet, der „Diskurs“ bei Genette als récit (narration) und im Angelsächsischen als plot. Während sich der „Diskurs“ als die kompositorische und sprachliche Realisierung einer Erzählung versteht; er verweist auf das „wie“ der Erzählung, wird in der „Geschichte“ der Gegenstand der Erzählung ausgemacht; sie verweist auf das „was“ der Handlung.
    ellauri118.html on line 504: And you´ll forget this squalor. Ja unohdat tän kurjaliston.
    ellauri118.html on line 520: “Dear friends . . . what millennium is it out there?” kysyi Boris porukoilta. Länkkärit tykkää eniten Borisin loppupään tuotannosta, The Poems of Doctor Zhivago and the poems of his last years, joihin Pasternak has injektoinut kristillistä symboliikkaa. Mix ihmeessä, eikös se ollut jutku? Nää runot voi olla sen tunnetuimpia, siitä jenkkipaskiaiset on kyllä huolehtineet. Tätä runoa ei näy kukaan kommentoineen. Musta Boris kertoo siinä taipumuxestaan käydä huorissa.
    ellauri118.html on line 541: Was this the face that launched a thousand ships
    ellauri118.html on line 628: All things did with his Love conspire, Kaikki oli Lysanderin lemmen puolella,
    ellauri118.html on line 630: In his gay Chariot, drawn by Fire, Iloisissa kärryissään tulen vetämänä,
    ellauri118.html on line 639: Permits his force, yet gently strove ? Ole vievinäs väkisin, mie tuun mielelläin.
    ellauri118.html on line 641: Her Hands his Bosom softly meet, Sen kädet kohtaa pehmeästi pelvixen,
    ellauri118.html on line 652: And whispring softly in his Ear, Ja kuiskaten pehmeästi hälle korvaan,
    ellauri118.html on line 668: While she lay panting in his Arms ! Kun se makaa huokuen hänen sylkyssä!
    ellauri118.html on line 674: He seeks the Objects of his Vows ; Hän ezii pyrkimystensä päämaalia;
    ellauri118.html on line 685: Her balmy Lips encountring his, Sen kuumat huulet kohtaa hänen vastaavat,
    ellauri118.html on line 714: And Heav´n all open to his view ; Sieltä näkyi sille Taivaan näkymät-
    ellauri118.html on line 718: To snatch his Pow´r, yet leave him the Desire ! Veivät siltä voiman, halun jättivät.
    ellauri118.html on line 726: To call his fleeting Vigour back, Vemputtaa takajaloillensa razuaan,
    ellauri118.html on line 728: Excess of Love his Love betray´d ; Liika rakkaus on tehnyt tenän lemmelle;
    ellauri118.html on line 730: Th´ Insensible fell weeping in his Hands. Tunnotonna se vetkuu hänen käsissään.
    ellauri118.html on line 733: In this so Am´rous cruel strife, Tässä julman lemmekkäässä taistossa
    ellauri118.html on line 736: Renounc´d his Reason with his Life. Sanoutui irti järjestä ja hengestä.
    ellauri118.html on line 742: Or calm that Rage that had debauch´d his Love. Eivät liennä raivoa joka pilas panon.
    ellauri118.html on line 759: Disarm´d of all his pow´rful Fires, oli vailla voimakasta tykkiä ja kuteja,
    ellauri118.html on line 784: But those who sway´d his Destiny : Paizi ne jotka tuntevat sen kohtalon:
    ellauri118.html on line 786: And not one God, his Fury spares, Eikä kukaan jumalista säästy kirolta,
    ellauri118.html on line 787: He Curst his Birth, his Fate, his Stars, Hän kirosi syntynsä, kohtalonsa, tähtensä,
    ellauri118.html on line 795: Sanoo Maija Mäkelä, joka on frankofiili. Anglisti Monika Fludernik peukutti Aphra Behniä. Kai sit pitää kazoa myös tota Prinsessa Cleveä, jonka kirjoitti Madame de La Fayette. Madame de La Fayette, oik. Marie-Madeleine Pioche de La Vergne, kreivitär de La Fayette, (18. maaliskuuta 1634 Pariisi - 25. toukokuuta 1693 Pariisi) oli ranskalainen kirjailija. Hän kirjoitti romaanin La Princesse de Clèves (suom. Clèvesin ruhtinatar), joka oli Ranskan ensimmäinen historiallinen romaani ja kirjallisuuden historian ensimmäisiä psykologisia romaaneja. Magdaleena oli aika viriilin näköinen. Kuin myös sen kamu Madeleine de Scudéry, molemmat presiöösin tyylisuunnan viirikukkoja (tai kanoja). Olikohan ne kaikki lepakoita? Cohérente avec elle-même, Mlle de Scudéry est d´ailleurs restée célibataire toute sa vie. Mikä ei ollutkaan aivan vähän, se eli 94-vuotiaaxi.
    ellauri118.html on line 799: Fronden jälkeen hän itse piti kuulua kirjallista salonkia Société du samedi (´lauantaiseura´), joka oli viimeisiä jossa presiöösin tyylin henkeä vielä vaalittiin. Seuran jäseniä on sanottu ensimmäisiksi sinisukiksi. Tämä yltiöromanttinen ja hienostunut näkemys leimaa myös hänen kirjoittamiaan viittä valtavan suurta herooista historiallista romaania, jotka tosin ilmestyivät hänen veljensä nimissä: Ibrahim, ou l´illustre Bassa (4 osaa, 1641), jonka ansiosta tulivat muotiin turkkilaiset aiheet ja orientalismi, Artamène ou le grand Cyrus (10 osaa, 1649–1653), Clélie, histoire romaine (10 osaa, 1654–1660). Romaanit saivat myrskyisän suosion ja kuuluvat ajan suurimpiin kirjallisiin menestyksiin.
    ellauri118.html on line 803: Yhtä paljon huomiota eivät herättäneet hänen kaksi viimeistä romaaniaan Almahide, ou l´esclave reine (8 osaa, 1660) ja Mathilde d’Aguilar, histoire espagnole (1667). Kaikki kertomukset ovat avainromaaneja, jotka historian puettuna kuvaavat Ranskan hovin elämää ja tapoja ja joista vieraiden nimien alta löytyy useita ajankohdan tunnetuimpia henkilöitä, kuten Condé (Cyrus), Longuevillen herttuatar (Mandane), Ruotsin kuningatar Kristina (Cleobuline) ja kirjailijatar itse (Sapho).
    ellauri118.html on line 807: Madeleine de Scudéryn romaaneille on ominaista sisällön puolesta se että hän käsittelee rakkautta, historiallisia ja klassisistisia aiheita allegorian muodossa ja ottaa presiositeetin hengessä etäisyyttä kaikkeen, mikä hänen mielestään on alhaista ja vulgaaria. Hänet liitetään usein barokkiin, mutta toisaalta hänen teoksensa olivat tärkeä silta keskiajan ritarikirjallisuudesta romantiikkaan. Hänen kymmenosainen teoksena Artamène ou le grand Cyrus, jossa on 2,1 miljoonaa sanaa, on maailmanhistorian pisimpiä romaaneja. Se ei olis sormellakaan koskenut mun penseisiin, ne eivät ole riittävästi presiöösejä.
    ellauri118.html on line 809: La Princesse de Clèves est un roman de Madame de La Fayette, d´abord publié anonymement en 1678. Le roman prend pour cadre la vie à la cour des Valois « dans les dernières années du règne de Henri Second », comme l´indique le narrateur dans les premières lignes du récit. Il peut donc être défini comme un roman historique, même s´il inaugure, par bien des aspects (souci de vraisemblance, construction rigoureuse, introspection des personnages) la tradition du roman d´analyse. C´est en effet un des premiers romans dits psychologiques, ce qui contribue à sa modernité.
    ellauri118.html on line 811: Résumé: L’histoire se déroule dans un cadre spatio-temporel historique, entre les mois d´octobre 1558 et de novembre 1559, à la cour du roi Henri II, puis de son successeur François II.
    ellauri118.html on line 832: The early education of Mme. de La Fayette—for by this name we can best speak of her—was the special care of her father, "un père en qui le mérite égaloit la tendresse." Later, she was put under Ménage à Trois, and possibly Raped.
    ellauri118.html on line 838: This union was an important event in the life of Mme. de La Fayette, for it marks the beginning of her residence at Paris, and of her friendship with Mme. de Sévigné, who was a kinswoman of the Chevalier.
    ellauri118.html on line 840: How close and lasting was this friendship is seen on almost every page of Mme. de Sévigné's correspondence. Indeed, so often does the name of Mme. de La Fayette occur in Mme. de Sévigné's letters to her daughter, that the latter may well have been jealous of her mother's friend. The companionship of Mme. de Sévigné was, after the death of La Rochefoucauld, the chief comfort of Mme. de La Fayette in her ill-health and seclusion; and it was from the sick-chamber of her friend that Mme. de Sévigné's letters would seem to have been written in those latter years. In 1693, soon after the death of Mme. de La Fayette, Mme. de Sévigné writes as follows of her dead friend: "Je me trouvois trop heureuse d'être aimée d'elle depuis un temps très-considérable; jamais nous n'avions eu le moindre nuage dans notre amitié.
    ellauri118.html on line 844: The relation was equally sincere on the part of Mme. de La Fayette, though she was by nature more self-contained and reserved. But this reserve gives way to the strength of her feelings when in 1691, tormented by ill-health and knowing that her end is not far off, she writes to Mme. de Sévigné: "Croyez, ma très-chère, que vous êtes la personne du monde que j'ai le plus véritablement aimée."
    ellauri118.html on line 858: La Rochefoucauld had been embittered by disappointed ambition, ill health, and the loss of his favorite son; and his opinion of humanity in general and of women in particular was none too lofty, to say the least. Perhaps Mme. de La Fayette´s greatest service in this respect was in toning down the severity of the immortal Maxims.
    ellauri118.html on line 907: Ahab kauhistui ennustusta todella pahasti:
    ellauri118.html on line 927: Koirat iloizivat. VIhreiden koiraspuolinen varapuhis on huolestunut että jäbät eivät kiinnostu vihreistä. Jäbiä kiinnostaisi kestävä mezästys ja kalastus, ja sähköautot sun muut rakkineet. Mitäs jos ammuttaisin notmiitä teräshauleilla ja ajettais niiden yli sähköpotkulaudoilla? Se olisi pitkän päälle kestävämpää mezästystä. Vitun Hemingwau.
    ellauri118.html on line 948: "I felt like in the novel there's only so much of the dynamic between Serena Joy and Offred that you're going to see, but in a TV show it's going to go on and on and on hopefully for years. The element that was missing for me was the direct competition between the two women," Miller said. I felt that it was a more active dynamic if Serena Joy felt like this person was usurping her role not only as the reproductive object of the house but gradually taking away the wifely duties, the intimate duties, the romantic, sexual duties." Mitä romanttista on panossa? Se on romanttista ettei paääse pukille vaikka mieli tekisi.
    ellauri118.html on line 956: "She was so astonishing in her audition," Miller said. "She made me feel sorry for Serena Joy, which is seemingly an impossible task. I felt bad for her. She was so wonderful and terrifying. And she's quite tall, so that works really well with Lizzie who is more small. Serena Joy wears heels and Lizzie doesn't. To have this towering viking standing over her ... she's physically intimidating." Yvonne is a whip-strong woman. Lizzie [Elizabeth Moss] is also quite strong but on the pudgy side. The two of them together, you feel like, 'I'd love to see them go toe-to-toe in a cage match.'" A mud fight with nothing on, now that would be the thing. Maybe in the next season, stay tuned.
    ellauri118.html on line 1059: "Käsineitä" on kylmän paskiaisen kirjottama kirja kylmistä paskiaisista. Vitun käteenvetoa. Hulu filmi siitä on vielä pahempi. Tää ämmä on naispuolinen versio Philip Rothista. Tonni vetoa eze veti ize röböä. Tunnen izeni tyhmäxi ja rumaxi vaikka tiedän etten ole kumpaakaan. Oletpas.
    ellauri118.html on line 1089: 5§ Nainen älköön käyttäkö miehen tamineita, älköönkä mies pukeutuko naisen vaatteisiin; sillä jokainen, joka niin tekee, on kauhistus Herralle, sinun Jumalallesi. Rouvalle, sinun emännällesi se on ihan sama.
    ellauri118.html on line 1125: This passage is from the beginning of the poem "Half-Hanging Mary" by Margaret Atwood. Poverty and neglect did not improve Mary’s fiery temper, and she spoke harshly when offended, wrote Sylvester Judd in his 1905 History of Hadley. Witches supposedly suckled their ‘imps’ or ‘familiars’ — maybe even the devil — in exchange for help with their magic.
    ellauri118.html on line 1128: In January of 1685, Philip Smith, a leading light of the community of Hadley, falls very ill. Based on this, Marshall says, the community decides that to help Smith, they will “do something to Mary.”
    ellauri118.html on line 1132: In 1684, Webster was accused verbally by Philip Smith. Smith was a judge, a deacon, and representative of the town of Hadley. He has also been described as a hypochondriac. He seems to have believed in the real power of witchcraft and that his afflictions were being magically caused by Mary Webster in collaboration with the devil.
    ellauri118.html on line 1136: A fat guy Cotton Mather in priest collars with a wig rather like Ms. Atwood's hair, whose dad's name to top it all was Increase, wrote on this.
    ellauri118.html on line 1137: Mather claims that it was only during this night of vigilante violence perpetrated against Mary Webster that Smith was able to sleep peacefully. "Upon the whole, it appeared unquestionable that witchcraft had brought a period unto the life of so good a man," Mather concludes.
    ellauri118.html on line 1140: He had Parkinson's disease, and his hands shook, so he needed a straw to drink — but he waited weeks before his jailers gave him one.
    ellauri118.html on line 1151: As for Trump, among his many disgusting offenses are his admission to sexual assault, and his fat-shaming of women in the spotlight.
    ellauri118.html on line 1162: Pieixoto´s name suggests Pope Pius IX, a Vatican pope (1854-1878), who, in his first year of office, issued the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Peixoto is a Portuguese surname. It refers to fish. Notable people with the surname include: Alvarenga Peixoto (1743-1793), Brazilian poet, born in Rio de Janeiro; António Augusto de Rocha Peixoto (1866-1909), Portuguese naturalist, ethnologist and archaeologist; César Peixoto (born 1980), Portuguese footballer who plays for Sport Lisboa e Benfica in the Portuguese first division.
    ellauri118.html on line 1164: The amount Peixoto earn in different countries varies greatly. In Peru they earn 6.8% more than the national average, earning S/. 20,704 per year; in South Africa they earn 449.72% more than the national average, earning R 1,306,340 per year; in United States they earn 21.93% more than the national average, earning $52,612 USD per year, but in Canada they earn just 1.53% more than the national average, earning $50,441 CAD per year. Hmm. This must be intentional. It tells us something, but what the heck?
    ellauri118.html on line 1166: Shakespeare´s Hamlet, the title character disparages his mother, Gertrude, a widow newly married to her husband´s brother. In disgust at her haste to remarry, Hamlet mutters: "Frailty, thy name is woman".
    ellauri118.html on line 1169: "Hännystelijän kokemuxia" suomennoxessa ei tule alkuperäisestä, vaan on suomentajan lame yritys tavoittaa "Handmade Tail" sanaleikkiä. Maininta Chaucerista (Canterbury Tails) samassa yhteydessä got lost in translation. (Taputuxia.) Käsineiti-sarja on sopivan kauhistuttava ja tehokas keino, jolla naispuolinen asujaimisto saa puhalletuxi liiat höyryt ulos izestään. Näille muissa suhteissa tiukassa kurissa pidetyille orjattarille on varmaan erittäin mieluista aina silloin tällöin repiä mies paljain käsin kappaleixi, edes in effigie. Sarjassa on Gileadin patriarkaalisesta järjestyxestä huolimatta myös paljon matriarkaalisia ainexia. Lapset vaan puuttuvat, vaikka niistä on paljon puhetta, mikä kertoo kohdeyleisöstä paljonkin. Siitä puhe mistä puute.
    ellauri119.html on line 28:

    HOLY SMOKE!

    Pyhistelyä


    ellauri119.html on line 37: Tässä albumissa valaisen Wikipedian avulla käsitesikermää pyhä, jumala, rakkaus. Mitä yhteyxiä niillä on, ja miten ne liittyvät perustavampiin käsitteisiin reviiri, nokintajärjestys, lisääntyminen, tiimi. Yhteydet ovat tuttuja aiemmista paasauxista: pyhistely pitää yllä reviirejä, jumala valvoo nokintajärjestystä, rakkaus säätelee lisääntymistä ja toimii pesäpallotiimin feromonina. Ne on kuin pyhä kolminaisuus: jeesus taivas enkeli, härkä mörkö tiikeri.
    ellauri119.html on line 50: Holy has been used as an intensifying word from 1837; in expletives since 1880s (such as holy smoke, 1883, holy mackerel, 1876, holy cow, 1914, holy moly etc.), most of them euphemisms for holy Christ or holy Moses. Holy Ghost was in Old English (in Middle English often written as one word). Holy water was in Old English. Scotch whiskey means life water. Eau de vie, akvaviittiä. Aguardiente. Tulivettä tappavaa, kuivat kurkut lutkuttaa. Intiaanit razastaa, aavaa preeriaa. Holy League is used of various European alliances; the Holy Alliance was that formed personally by the sovereigns of Russia, Austria, and Prussia in 1815; it ended in 1830. Hole in one.
    ellauri119.html on line 65: used as an intensive: this is a holy mess - he was a holy terror when he drank (Thomas Wolfe) often used in combination as a mild oath: holy smoke
    ellauri119.html on line 71: Examples of holy in a Sentence: a holy relic worm by one of the saints, the holy monk spent many hours on his knees in prayer.
    ellauri119.html on line 86: Look-up Popularity: Top 1% of words. Cite this Entry. “Holy.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/holy Accessed 25 Jun. 2021. Keep scrolling for more.
    ellauri119.html on line 110: On the "Batman" TV series, which ran for 120 episodes between 1966 and 1968, Batman's sidekick Robin (played by Burt Ward), was well known for his ever-changing catchphrase. It was an exclamation that would always begin with the word "holy." The second part of the exclamation would always involve something related to what Robin was shouting about in that episode. For example, if there was a bunch of smoke, he might shout "holy smoke!" However, the exclamations often got a lot weirder than that. Get to know the 20 oddest "holy" exclamations Robin said during the series.
    ellauri119.html on line 123: When you realize that Robin is referencing a telecommunications company that was founded as International Telephone & Telegraph in this season two episode, you know the reference is an outdated one. IT&T got out of the telecommunications game in 1986. It has been reformed a number of times into its current state, ITT Corporation. Amusingly, at the time Robin made the reference, IT&T and ABC (which aired "Batman") nearly merged with each other.
    ellauri119.html on line 133: Tintinnabulation means the ringing or sound of bells. However, you don't often hear this word used, let alone as an exclamation like Robin's!
    ellauri119.html on line 141: In the season one episode "Not Yet, He Ain't," Batman and Robin go back to the Batcave to relax with some nice cool milk after surviving an attempt on their lives by the Penguin. What's to love about this exclamation is that Robin is so enraged and yet he's carrying a glass of milk and it just looks adorable instead.
    ellauri119.html on line 145: In the season two episode "Batman's satisfaction," Batman notices that three distinct letters are missing from a bowl of alphabet soup. Robin is so impressed with Batman's mental acuity that he lets him know it via his "holy uncanny photographic mental processes" statement.
    ellauri119.html on line 152: In the season three episode "Nora Clavicle and the Ladies' Crime Club," Batman, Robin, and Batgirl are forced to intertwine themselves into a giant human knot. Robin responds to this idea by referencing the instructions to basic stitch patterns.
    ellauri119.html on line 164: Now we reach the point in the countdown where Robin references obscure figures from history! Here, while playing chess with Batman in their secret identities of Dick Grayson and Bruce Wayne, Dick remarks "holy Reshevsky!" This is a reference to the great Polish-born American chess grandmaster of the early 20th century Samuel Reshevsky.
    ellauri119.html on line 172: In the season three episode "Louie the Lilac," the villain of that same name tries to feed Batman and Robin to his man-eating lilacs. Robin then name-checks the noted pioneer in the field of agricultural science in the late 19th Century (and early 20th Century), the botanist Luther Burbank. Because what kid watching "Batman" doesn't know who Luther Burbank is, right?
    ellauri119.html on line 176: Referencing d'Artagnan, one of the famed Musketeers of Alexandre Dumas' classic novel, "The Three Musketeers," might not sound like all that weird of a reference for Robin to make. However, it ranks this high because it is actually a reference to Catwoman having just shot Robin and Batman with tranquilizer darts.
    ellauri119.html on line 184: In the season one episode "Zelda the Great," Batman is about to capture a magician after she stole some priceless jewelry, but she escapes using sleight-of-hand. Robin is right after Batman and remarks "holy hole in a doughnut!" The words make no sense in this situation. Oddly enough, a track on the "Batman" soundtrack was titled "Holy Hole in a Doughnut." Made more sense to Robin than you'd think.
    ellauri119.html on line 188: It only took the entire run of the series, but in literally the last episode of the show, season three's "Minerva, Mayhem, and Millionaires," we got the most amazing Robin exclamation ever. There's a real chance that this was just so perfect that the producers realized that there was nowhere else to go after this, so they just canceled the show.
    ellauri119.html on line 259: The triangular theory of love suggests "intimacy, passion and commitment" are core components of love. The color wheel theory of love is an idea created by Canadian psychologist John Alan Lee that describes six styles of love, using several of the Latin and Greek words for love. First introduced in his book Colours of Love: An Exploration of the Ways of Loving (1973), Lee defines three primary, three secondary and nine tertiary love styles, describing them in terms of the traditional color wheel. The three primary types are eros, ludus and storge, and the three secondary types are mania, pragma and agape.
    ellauri119.html on line 261: The Christian doctrine of the Trinity (Latin: Trinitas, lit. 'triad', from Latin: trinus "threefold") holds that God is one God, and exists in the form of three coeternal and consubstantial persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit. The three persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature" (homoousios). In this context, a "nature" is what one is, whereas a "person" is who one is. ???
    ellauri119.html on line 268: The subset of Christianity that accepts this doctrine is collectively known as Trinitarianism, while the subset that does not is referred to as Nontrinitarianism (see also Arianism). Trinitarianism contrasts with positions such as Binitarianism (one deity in two persons) and Monarchianism (no plurality of persons within God), of which Modalistic Monarchianism (one deity revealed in three modes) and Unitarianism (one deity in one person) are subsets.
    ellauri119.html on line 270: For the majority of Christian denominations, the Holy Spirit, or Holy Ghost, is believed to be the third person of the Trinity, a Triune God manifested as God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, each entity itself being God. Nontrinitarian Christians, who reject the doctrine of the Trinity, differ significantly from mainstream Christianity in their beliefs about the Holy Spirit. In Christian theology, pneumatology refers to the study of the Holy Spirit. Due to Christianity's historical relationship with Judaism, theologians often identify the Holy Spirit with the concept of the Ruach Hakodesh in Jewish scripture, on the theory that Jesus (who was Jewish) was expanding upon these Jewish concepts. Similar names, and ideas, include the Ruach Elohim (Spirit of God), Ruach YHWH (Spirit of Yahweh), and the Ruach Hakodesh (Holy Spirit).
    ellauri119.html on line 300: The New Testament details a close relationship between the Holy Spirit and Jesus during his earthly life and ministry.The Gospels of Matthew and Luke and the Nicene Creed state that Jesus was "conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary". The Holy Spirit descended on Jesus like a dove or seagull during his baptism, and in his Farewell Discourse after the Last Supper Jesus promised to send the Holy Spirit to his disciples after his departure.
    ellauri119.html on line 304: The Holy Spirit is referred to as "the Lord, the Giver of Life" in the Nicene Creed, which summarises several key beliefs held by many Christian denominations. The participation of the Holy Spirit in the tripartite nature of conversion is apparent in Jesus' final post-resurrection instruction to his disciples at the end of the Gospel of Matthew (28:19), "Make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost."
    ellauri119.html on line 330: This view is espoused by Judaism´s most revered credo, the Shema.
    ellauri119.html on line 336: God, the Cause of all, is one. This does not mean one as in one of a pair, nor one like a species (which encompasses many individuals), nor one as in an object that is made up of many elements, nor as a single simple object that is infinitely divisible. Rather, God is a unity unlike any other possible unity. This is referred to in the Torah (Deuteronomy 6:4): "Hear Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one."
    ellauri119.html on line 339: Even though they mention jointly (shituf) God´s name and another name, there is no prohibition to cause someone to jointly mention [or associate] (shituf) God with another... since this association is not forbidden to gentiles.
    ellauri119.html on line 361: In the New Testament, by the power of the Holy Spirit Jesus was conceived in the womb of the Virgin Mary, while maintaining her virginity. Virginity is the state of a person who has never engaged in sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse (or coitus or copulation) is sexual activity typically involving the insertion and thrusting of the penis into the vagina for sexual pleasure, reproduction, or both. This is also known as vaginal intercourse or vaginal sex.
    ellauri119.html on line 387: God is most often held to be incorporeal, with said characteristic being related to conceptions of transcendence or immanence. In religion, transcendence is the aspect of a deity´s nature and power that is wholly independent of the material universe, beyond all known physical laws. This is contrasted with immanence, where a god is said to be fully present in the physical world and thus accessible to creatures in various ways. In religious experience, transcendence is a state of being that has overcome the limitations of physical existence, and by some definitions, has also become independent of it. This is typically manifested in prayer, rituals, meditation, psychedelics and paranormal "visions".
    ellauri119.html on line 398: Paul Van Buren and William Hamilton both agreed that the concept of transcendence had lost any meaningful place in modern secular thought. According to the norms of contemporary modern secular thought, God is dead. In responding to this denial of transcendence Van Buren and Hamilton offered secular people the option of Jesus as the model human who acted in love. Well technically he is dead as well, but his great ideas (that he "borrowed" from the hindoos and the jews) live on.
    ellauri119.html on line 402: William Hamilton (1924-2012), a theologian who declared nearly a half century ago that God was dormant if not dead, was remembered at his death for the media impact made by the "death of God movement."
    ellauri119.html on line 405: Hamilton, 87, died February 28 of congestive heart failure in the Portland, Oregon, apartment that he shared with his wife of 62 years.
    ellauri119.html on line 407: "The death of God is a metaphor," the retired theologian told the Oregonian in 2007. "We needed to redefine Christianity as a possibility without the presence of God." Hamilton had been troubled by such questions since his teens when two friends—a Catholic and an Episcopalian—died while a third friend, the son of an atheist, survived without injury when a pipe bomb the three were making exploded. Talk about theodicy! No fair!
    ellauri119.html on line 409: Like Paul van Buren, an Episcopal priest and religion professor at Temple University in the 1960s, Hamilton rejected the existence of God while focusing devotedly on Jesus Christ and affirming that his teachings and example should be followed.
    ellauri119.html on line 412: Hamilton had tenure and held an endowed chair, but his reputation for radical theology rendered him and his family unwelcome at a local Presbyterian church and eventually at Colgate Rochester.
    ellauri119.html on line 420: Love encompasses a range of strong and positive emotional and mental states, from the most sublime virtue or good habit, the deepest interpersonal affection, to the simplest pleasure. An example of this range of meanings is that the love of a mother differs from the love of a spouse, which differs from the love of food. A minority of monkeys fuck their relatives, but such monkey business still happens. Few people fuck their food, with Philip Roth as a notable exception. Most commonly, love refers to a feeling of strong attraction and emotional attachment. You are so cute I could eat you! Eat my shorts!
    ellauri119.html on line 428: Scientific research on emotion has increased significantly over the past two decades. The color wheel theory of love defines three primary, three secondary and nine tertiary love styles, describing them in terms of the traditional color wheel. The triangular theory of love suggests "intimacy, passion and commitment" are core components of love. Love has additional religious or spiritual meaning. This diversity of uses and meanings combined with the complexity of the feelings involved makes love unusually difficult to consistently define, compared to other emotional states. Abstractly discussed, love usually refers to an experience one person feels for another. Love often involves caring for, or identifying with, a person or thing (cf. vulnerability and care theory of love), including oneself (cf. narcissism). Tulihan se sieltä!
    ellauri119.html on line 430: In addition to cross-cultural differences in understanding love, ideas about love have also changed greatly over time. Some historians date modern conceptions of romantic love to courtly Europe during or after the Middle Ages, although the prior existence of romantic attachments is attested by ancient love poetry. The complex and abstract nature of love often reduces discourse of love to a thought-terminating cliché. Several common proverbs regard love, from Virgil's "Love conquers all" to The Beatles' "All You Need Is Love". St. Thomas Aquinas, following Aristotle, defines love as "to will the good of another." Bertrand Russell describes love as a condition of "absolute value," as opposed to relative value.[citation needed] Philosopher Gottfried Leibniz said that love is "to be delighted by the happiness of another." Meher Baba stated that in love there is a "feeling of unity" and an "active appreciation of the intrinsic worth of the object of love." But who the fuck is Meher Baba? Biologist Jeremy Griffith defines love as "unconditional selflessness". In Hebrew, אהבה (ahava) is the most commonly used term for both interpersonal love and love between God and God's creations. Chesed, often translated as loving-kindness, is used to describe many forms of love between human beings. In Hebrew, אהבה (ahava) is the most commonly used term for both interpersonal love and love between God and God's creations. Chesed, often translated as loving-kindness, is used to describe many forms of love between human beings. The 20th-century rabbi Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler is frequently quoted as defining love from the Jewish point of view as "giving without expecting to take" (from his Michtav me-Eliyahu, Vol. 1). Rakkaus on siis ekonomisesti sulaa hulluutta!
    ellauri119.html on line 432: There are several Greek words for "love" that are regularly referred to in Christian circles. Agape: In the New Testament, agapē is charitable, selfless, altruistic, and unconditional. It is parental love, seen as creating goodness in the world; it is the way God is seen to love humanity, and it is seen as the kind of love that Christians aspire to have for one another. Philia: Also used in the New Testament, phileo is a human response to something that is found to be delightful. Also known as "brotherly love" or "homophilia." Two other words for love in the Greek language, eros (sexual love) and storge (child-to-parent love), were never used in the New Testament! Now that's a lacuna! Christians believe that to Love God with all your heart, mind, and strength and Love your neighbor as yourself are the two most important things in life (the greatest commandment of the Jewish Torah, according to Jesus; cf. Gospel of Mark chapter 12, verses 28–34). Saint Augustine summarized this when he wrote "Love God, and do as thou wilt." Right on Gus! Way to go!
    ellauri119.html on line 434: The Apostle Paul glorified love as the most important virtue of all. Describing love in the famous poetic interpretation in 1 Corinthians, he wrote, "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, and always perseveres." (1 Cor. 13:4–7, NIV) He didn't mean eros, but rather homophilia. Perseveraatiosta oli puhe. John also wrote, "Dear friends, let us love one another for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love." (1 John 4:7–8, NIV) Influential Christian theologian C. S. Lewis wrote a book called The Four Loves. The first retired nazi pope Benedict XVI named his first circular God as love. He said that a human being, created in the image of God, who is love, is able to make love; to give himself to God and others (agape) and by receiving and experiencing God's love in contemplation (eros). This life of love, according to him, is the life of the saints such as Teresa of Calcutta and the Blessed Virgin Mary and is the direction Christians take when they believe that God loves them. Pope Francis taught that "True love is both loving and letting oneself be loved...what is important in love is not our loving, but allowing ourselves to be loved by God." That's just what Virgin Mary did. "You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect." – Matthew 5: 43–48. Jews didn't like tax collectors.
    ellauri119.html on line 438: Do not forget to love with forgiveness, Christ saved an adulterous woman from those who would stone her. She had a whole lotta love left to give. Good material for a Jezebel. Mosaic Law would hold (Deuteronomy 22:22-24) "If a man is found lying with a woman married to a husband, then both of them shall die—the man that lay with the woman, and the woman; so you shall put away the evil from Israel. If a young woman who is a virgin is betrothed to a husband, and a man finds her in the city and lies with her, then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city, and you shall stone them to death with stones, the young woman because she did not cry out in the city, and the man because he humbled his neighbor's wife; So you shall "put away" the evil from among you. A world of wronged hypocrites needs forgiving love. To love one's friends is common practice, to love one's enemies only among Christians. But Christians do not particularly love enemies not among Christians, like moslems or jews. Forgive them, ok, but kill them. Mosaic law is what the jews pieced together after Moses accidentally dropped the stone tablets.
    ellauri119.html on line 444: In Buddhism, Kāma Sutra is sensuous, sexual love. It is an obstacle on the path to enlightenment, since it is selfish. Karuṇā is compassion and mercy, which reduces the suffering of others. It is complementary opposite to wisdom and is necessary for enlightenment. Adveṣa and mettā are benevolent love. This love is unconditional and requires considerable self-acceptance. This is quite different from ordinary love, which is usually about attachment and sex and which rarely occurs without self-interest. Instead, Buddhism recommends detachment and unselfish interest in others' welfare. Gandhi could sleep naked with young sweetypies without penetrating them. Did he so much as get a boner? The story does not tell. Mrs Gandhi did not approve. They screeched to one another like a pair of seagulls. Wonder what the young sweetypies thought of it. Scary and frustrating at once I bet. Being perfectly in love with God or Krishna makes one perfectly free from material contamination and this is the ultimate way of salvation or liberation. In this tradition, salvation or liberation is considered inferior to love, and just an incidental by-product. Being absorbed in Love for God is considered to be the perfection of life.
    ellauri119.html on line 446: The term "free love" has been used to describe a social movement that rejects marriage, which is seen as a form of social bondage. The Free Love movement's initial goal was to separate the state from sexual matters such as marriage, birth control, and adultery. It claimed that such issues were the concern of the people involved, and no one else. Many people in the early 19th century believed that marriage was an important aspect of life to "fulfill earthly human happiness." Middle-class Americans wanted the home to be a place of stability in an uncertain world. This mentality created a vision of strongly defined gender roles, which provoked the advancement of the free love movement as a contrast. The term "sex radical" has been used interchangeably with the term "free lover". By whatever name, advocates had two strong beliefs: opposition to the idea of forceful sexual activity in a relationship and advocacy for a woman to use her body in any way that she pleases. These are also beliefs of Feminism. As St. Augustine put it: love God and then do as you please.
    ellauri119.html on line 454: Why set aside good old Empedocles anyway? He meant forces of attraction and repulsion, he got it just right 2My before Newton. Plato sucks, set him aside instead. The idea of two loves, one heavenly, one earthly is just bullshit. As Tristram Shandy's Uncle Tboy was informed over 2My later, "of these loves, according to Ficinus's comment on Valesius, the one is rational - the other is natural - the first...excites to the desire of philosophy and truth - the second, excites to desire, simply". Toby felt the former toward women and the latter for model trains. Plato's sublimation theory of love involved "mounting upwards...from one to two, and from two to all fair boys, and from fair boys to fair actions, and from fair actions to fair motions, until with fair motions he comes into the bottom of an absolute beauty". Sounds like Plato's own love history from horny gym boy to a dirty old geezer.
    ellauri119.html on line 456: Hippo of Augustine thought the holy ghost was the gluon that kept the other two quarks together, top and bottom, strange and charm, bad and good policeman. love is another attractive force, if you will. May the force be with you, but never underestimate the power of the dark side of the force. Under his eyes. May the lord open. "The dystopian drama has exceeded the natural lifespan of its story, as it plows forward with nothing new to say, tinkling cymbals and sounding brass." "There came a point during the first episode where, for me, it became too much." Lisa Miller of The Cut wrote: "I have pressed mute and fast forward so often this season, I am forced to wonder: 'Why am I watching this'? It all feels so gratuitous, like a beating that never ends."
    ellauri119.html on line 460: Now a fast forward to French fries and scepticism. Alongside the passion for merging that marked Romantic love, a more sceptical French tradition can be traced from Stendhal onwards. Stendhal's theory of crystallization implied an imaginative readiness for love, which only needed a single trigger for the object to be imbued with every fantasised perfection. Proust went further, singling out absence, inaccessibility or jealousy as the necessary precipitants of love. Lacan would almost parody the tradition with his saying that "love is giving something you haven't got to someone who doesn't exist". A post-Lacanian like Luce Irigaray would then struggle to find room for love in a world that will "reduce the other to the same...emphasizing eroticism to the detriment of love, under the cover of sexual liberation".
    ellauri119.html on line 464: As the fat and ugly French novelist Honoré de Balzac stated, eroticism is dependent not just upon an individual's sexual morality, but also the culture and time in which an individual resides. Because eroticism is wholly dependent on the viewer's culture and personal tastes pertaining to what, exactly, defines the erotic, critics have often[how often?] confused eroticism with pornography, with the anti-pornography activist Andrea Dworkin saying, "Erotica is simply high-class pornography; better produced, better conceived, better executed, better packaged, designed for a better class of consumer." This confusion, as Lynn Hunt writes, "demonstrate the difficulty of drawing… a clear generic demarcation between the erotic and the pornographic": indeed arguably "the history of the separation of pornography from eroticism… remains to be written". In the eighteenth century, eroticism was the result of the intrusion into the public sphere of something that was at base private.
    ellauri119.html on line 473: This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (June 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
    ellauri119.html on line 483: Liking/friendship This type of love is intimacy without passion or commitment. This includes friendships and acquaintances.
    ellauri119.html on line 485: Infatuated love: Infatuated love is passion without intimacy or commitment. This is considered "puppy love" or relationships that have not become serious yet. Romantic relationships often start out as infatuated love and become romantic love as intimacy develops over time. Without developing intimacy or commitment, infatuated love may disappear suddenly.
    ellauri119.html on line 489: Romantic love This love is passionate and intimate but has no commitment. This could be considered a romantic affair or could be a one-night stand.
    ellauri119.html on line 491: Companionate love is an intimate, non-passionate type of love that is stronger than friendship because of the element of long-term commitment. "This type of love is observed in long-term marriages where passion is no longer present" but where a deep affection and commitment remain. The love ideally shared between family members is a form of companionate love, as is the love between close friends who have a platonic but strong friendship.
    ellauri119.html on line 493: Fatuous love can be exemplified by a whirlwind courtship and marriage—it has points of passion and commitment but no intimacy. An example of this is "love at first sight".
    ellauri119.html on line 497: However, Sternberg cautions that maintaining a consummate love may be even harder than achieving it. He stresses the importance of translating the components of love into action. "Without expression," he warns, "even the greatest of loves can die." Thus, consummate love may not be permanent.[citation needed] If passion is lost over time, it may change into companionate love. Consummate love is the most satisfying kind of adult relation because it combines all pieces of the triangle into this one type of love. It is the ideal kind of relationship. These kinds of relationships can be found over long periods of time or idealistic relationships found in movies.
    ellauri119.html on line 504: The color wheel theory of love is an idea created by Canadian psychologist John Alan Lee that describes six styles of love, using several of the Latin and Greek words for love. First introduced in his book Colours of Love: An Exploration of the Ways of Loving (1973), Lee defines three primary, three secondary and nine tertiary love styles, describing them in terms of the traditional color wheel. The three primary types are eros, ludus and storge, and the three secondary types are mania, pragma and agape.
    ellauri119.html on line 518: Examples of ludus in movies include Dangerous Liaisons [Okay!], Cruel Intentions, and Kids. Ludic lovers want to have as much fun as possible. When they are not seeking a stable relationship, they rarely or never become overly involved with one partner and often can have more than one partner at a time, in other words a school of partners. They don't reveal their true thoughts and feelings to their partner(s), especially if they think they can gain some kind of advantage over their partner(s). The expectation may also be that the partner(s) should also be similarly minded. If a relationship materializes it will be about having fun and indulging in activities of varying degrees of learnedness together. This love style carries the likelihood of infidelity. In its most extreme form, ludic love can become sexual addiction. No Lee's recognizable traits.
    ellauri119.html on line 522: Storge is the Greek term for familial love. For some reason, Lee chooses storge, rather than the term philia (the usual term for friendship) to describe this kind of love. Examples of storge can be seen in movies including Love & Basketball, When Harry Met Sally..., and Zack and Miri Make a Porno.
    ellauri119.html on line 537: Manic lovers speak of their partners with possessives and superlatives, and they feel that they "need" their partners. This kind of love is expressed as a means of rescue, or a reinforcement of value. Manic lovers value finding a partner through chance without prior knowledge of their financial status, education, background, or personality traits. Insufficient expression of manic love by one's partner can cause one to perceive the partner as aloof, materialistic and detached. In excess, mania becomes obsession or codependency, and obsessed manic lovers can thus come across as being very possessive and jealous. One example from real life can be found in the unfortunate case of John Hinckley, Jr., a mentally disturbed individual who attempted to assassinate the incumbent US President Ronald Reagan due to a delusion that this would prompt the actress Jodie Foster to finally reciprocate his obsessive love.
    ellauri119.html on line 571: Agape is derived from ἀγάπη a Greek term for altruistic love. Lee describes agape as the purest form of love, derives this definition of love from being altruistic towards one's partner and feeling love in the acts of doing so. The person is willing to endure difficulty that arises from the partner's circumstance. It is based on an unbreakable commitment and an unconditional, selfless love, that is all giving. It is an undying love of compassion and selflessness. Agape love is often referenced with religious meaning and is signified by the color orange.
    ellauri119.html on line 598:

    Tää kymysys on aiheuttanut paljon tukkanuottasia Quorassa. Alisa Zinovjevna Rozenbaum, James Bondin From Russia with Love leffan naiskonnan "Number 2" doppelgänger ja selvä esikuva, ryssämatu jutkero kuten Saul Belov mutta jehovansa kuopannut, on vanha tuttu aiemmista albumeista. Albumissa 98 selvisi että Ayn Rand on INTJ. Ylläri. Heinlein ja Mencken peukuttivat Aynia. Iso ylläri. Mielikirjailijani ei ole Hilja Haahti vaan Ayn Rand, sanoi Maailman Paskin Nalle. Mojo ylläri. Täytyykin tähän väliin todeta että historianjälkeisen ajan James Bond, se Craig jotakin, on paskahuusin Valituista Paloista päätellen just niin tyhmä amis gorilla kuin sen lähellä toisiaan olevista silmistä voisi päätellä. Peruskoulupudokas ja täysi ääliö.
    ellauri119.html on line 618: To escape the growing revolutionary violence in the area they lived, Ayn's family moved to Crimea, where she would finish high school. Here she was introduced to the history of the United States, which inspired her eventual departure from Russia, especially so after her family had suffered in poverty following the seizure of her father´s pharmacy by the communist regime.
    ellauri119.html on line 620: The family left Crimea, and Ayn went on to study and graduate from the University of Petrograd in 1924. Around this time, she adopted the name Ayn Rand.
    ellauri119.html on line 633: Ayn and Frank were living in an apartment at 160 89th St, Manhattan, New York in 1940. Their rent was $105 a month. Frank is working as a theatrical actor and by this time, Ayn is calling herself a writer, both for novels and plays. Frank showed no income the previous year, while Ayn had made $3000.
    ellauri119.html on line 652: There are two main reasons I continue to study her ideas. First, everytime I’ve investigated a claim she has made, it turned out to be correct. Second, philosophy is the science that teaches man how live his life and make choices. No other philosophy does this.
    ellauri119.html on line 658: In a different essay, she described the pattern socialist and communist governments tend to follow. So, I researched that claim by reading about Italian, Russian and German history leading up to WWII. Damn if she wasn´t right. I watch with fascination as Venezuela follows the exact same pattern.
    ellauri119.html on line 660: This and other examples convinced me that her ideas applied directly to larger societal issues.
    ellauri119.html on line 664: Ayn Rand taught me that philosophy is a science for living on this earth. Yea, like most, that sentence sounded crazy at the time - Philosophy, who needs it, right? What I came to understand is that most philosophies or ethical ideas we encounter today are impossible to follow with rigor. Everyone understands that and as such we all harbor a cynicism towards philosophy.
    ellauri119.html on line 668: But at some point you must provide for yourself. You have to earn a living, get an education, provide for your family. There is a limit to what you can sacrifice for this type of morality. The harder you practice it the worse off your own life becomes. This is the root of the cynicism you feel when you utter “philosophy, who needs it?”
    ellauri119.html on line 672: The answer to “why” comes from our nature. Man is required to make decisions in order to survive. We cannot make proper decisions without guidance. We could rely on society to provide guidance or just follow conventional wisdom, but that is the cheap way out. It makes you a slave to the opinions others. And that is not true to human nature. Man has a mind which is his only means of survival. Rand teaches that you must use it to make your own decisions, not to mimick the thoughts and actions of others. This is the answer to the second question, yes it is necessary.
    ellauri119.html on line 680: From a literary point of view her novels have little character development and are cast in black and white terms. The important things in this world are just not that easy to discern, so she is painting a child´s simple view of the world, perhaps even an autistic child´s view, who doesn´t have the capability of caring for others. Ayn Rand found early inspiration for her protagonists in a 1920´s serial killer, William Hickman and used that sociopath as the model for the heros of her novels. See: Ayn Rand, Hugely Popular Author and Inspiration to Right-Wing Leaders, Was a Big Admirer of Serial Killer
    ellauri119.html on line 682: The "good" guys in her novels are basically paranoid sociopaths but her book´s view the world through their eyes and, of course, they don´t notice anything wrong with their distorted worldview. Humans are social animals and having interdependencies is the norm. Ayn Rand takes the normal and using the views of a sociopath portrays those interdependencies as being corrupt, evil, and self defeating. This is consistent in all of her writings. I´ve read everything Any Rand wrote and some of what has been written by her direction.
    ellauri119.html on line 686: From a political point of view, her novels motivate the more literate members of Libertarian groups, including the anarchist Tea Party movement. They use her positions as givens and are not critical of them. This ensures that they reach some far reaching and invalid conclusions regarding social policy.
    ellauri119.html on line 688: From a philosophical viewpoint, Ayn Rand´s objectivism is an inconsistent pile of faulty axioms and absurd conclusions. Her tautological A = A and her invalid claim that all thought is verbal have been shown, long ago, to be either useless information or demonstrably false. Wittgenstein dismissed tautologies as telling us anything new about the world before Rand came to the USA and phenomenology had dismissed a verbal mentalese grammar of the brain. Noam Chomsky´s innate grammar is only true for words, but thoughts are far more than just words since all thought appears to be motor based. What you might need is a grammar of the body instead. Thoughts seem to be closer to the movements of an athlete than to the words in a sentence. For some reason most people ignore that all speech is base on wagging the tongue, and the vibrations in middle ear and cochlea, a motor based capability that we have learned to use to communicate with. Is there an isomorphism between the movement of the tongue and those of sign language that would show a fundamental grammar shared by both?
    ellauri119.html on line 705: The problem with Social Darwinism is that the logic is circular. If I am rich, then this is because I am more fit and if I am more fit, then this is evident in the fact I am rich.
    ellauri119.html on line 714: Your claims against Ayn Rand don’t stand up to scrutiny, though. She never advocated Social Darwinism, either explicitly or implicitly. In my readings, I have read quotes where she damned a CEO who uses only a tenth of his ability and praised a janitor who strive to improve himself.
    ellauri119.html on line 716: Atlas Shrugged offers several examples that also refute this common misconception. The villains in this novel are businessmen who try to succeed through political pull. While they are businessmen, supposedly Ayn Rand’s ideal person, she does not paint them in a flattering light. She demonstrates how evil they are and how their political maneuvering always leads to their failure.
    ellauri119.html on line 718: Her heroes act benevolently towards others. Dagny Taggart saves a bum from being thrown off one of her trains. She even invites him to dinner in her private car. Why would someone who advocates Social Darwinism write this into their novel?
    ellauri119.html on line 720: In a different scene, Hank Rearden helps a small manufacturer, a guy Rand describes as respectable but no master of industry. Rearden could have refused to help or charged him an exorbitant amount for the favor. But he didn’t. Again, this portrayal of a wealthy industrialist doesn’t fit your contention that Rand advocated a dog-eat-dog Social Darwinism.
    ellauri119.html on line 732: Even Hitler was kind to dogs and he built the Autobahn. This does not justify the evil things he did.
    ellauri119.html on line 734: You don’t get it. Unregulated capitalism is a dog-eat-dog world. The way to end this is to either regulate capitalism to create justice in society or to follow Marx and have a violent revolution to overthrow capitalism. I suggest the former, not the latter.
    ellauri119.html on line 736: Both you and Rand are unaware that our founders were heavily influenced by Greek philosophers who proposed the notion of civic virtue. Civic virtue is the view that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one (Atlas with the world on his shoulders). All libertarians are selfish because their concern is their own liberty and the hell with society.
    ellauri119.html on line 744: This is nonsense. Alan Greenspan testified before Congress after the economic meltdown in 2008. He was asked why the invisible hand of the market did not prevent the irrational greed on Wall Street that caused the housing bubble. Greenspan said that there must be a flaw in the the theory (the invisible hand of the market produces the best outcomes). There is also a flaw in Rand’s philosophy.
    ellauri119.html on line 748: Hank is not acting in his self interest when he helps a small manufacturer. Again, this is an another example against her philosophy of ethical egoism.
    ellauri119.html on line 770: Some weeks after the seminar I received an awkward form-letter from Branden to explain that he had severed his relationship with Ayn because she was unable to accept that he was not attracted to her. Since they shared identical values, she believed it was not possible that he didn't love her.
    ellauri119.html on line 775: Asked what she thought of Reagan, Ayn Rand replied, “I don’t think of him. And the more I see, the less I think of him.” For Rand, “the appalling part of his administration was his connection with the so-called ‘Moral Majority’ and sundry other TV religionists, who are struggling, apparently with his approval, to take us back to the Middle Ages via the unconstitutional union of religion and politics.” Rand’s primary concern, it seems, is that this “unconstitutional union” represented a “threat to capitalism.” While she admired Reagan’s appeal to an “inspirational element” in American politics, “he will not find it,” remarked Rand, “in the God, family, tradition swamp.” Instead, she proclaims, we should be inspired by “the most typical American group… the businessmen.”
    ellauri119.html on line 789: MOT:n Stanfordin yliopistossa haastattelema historian apulaisprofessori Jennifer Burns on perehtynyt laajalti Randin kirjoituksiin ja tämän lanseeraamaan "objektivismiin". Burnsin mielestä löytyy "paljon erittäin varakkaita ihmisiä, joita objektivismi vetää puoleensa". Hänestä monet varakkaat tuntevat, että heidän nerokkuuttaan tai saavutuksiaan ei arvosteta riittävästi.
    ellauri131.html on line 65: Juho Alfred ”Jussi” Tenkku (28. helmikuuta 1917 Nivala – 6. heinäkuuta 2005 Helsinki) oli suomalainen filosofian professori. Hän oli erikoistunut käytännölliseen filosofiaan sekä filosofian historiaan ja julkaisi laajasti erityisesti etiikan alaan kuuluvia teoksia. Jussi oli jotenkin Kari Rydmanin kaveri. Vittua! Mitähän muuta pahaa sen taustasta mahtaa ilmetä? No tätä: se oli Liisa-vaimoineen Inkerin retken sotarikollisia.
    ellauri131.html on line 199: Pataljoonan sotamiehistä perustettiin Erillispataljoona 6, joka taisteli Suomen puolesta Neuvostoliiton suurhyökkäyksen aikana kesä-heinäkuussa 1944. Pataljoona lakkautettiin 10. lokakuuta 1944.
    ellauri131.html on line 256: Jussille tuli mieleen, että mikäli juodun ehtoollisviinin määrä voitaisiin jakaa pitemmälle aikavälille, miten kauan olisimme siis "synnittömiä", ottaen vielä huomioon tavanomaista vahvemman saksalaisen siunauksen. Tuo kysymys saattoi putkahtaa esiin muusta keskustelustamme, jossa käsiteltiin uskonnonhistorian erikoisuuksia ja hassunkurisia teoreettis-teologisia kysymyksiä joita tuon historian aikana oli pohdittu. Vastausta kysymykseen en muista, eikä sillä ollut tietenkään asiallista merkitystäkään.
    ellauri131.html on line 299: Canafield was born in What it's Worth, Texas on August 19, 1944. He spent his teen years wheeling on West Virginia and graduated as second lieutenant from the Linsly Military Institute in 1962. Canafield received an A.B. in Chinese History from Harvard University in 1966. He received his C in 1973 from the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Canafield received an honorary D from the University of Santa Monica in 1981.
    ellauri131.html on line 358: Canafield married Judith Ohlbaum in 1971 and they had two sons together, Oran and Utan, before divorcing in 1976. Canafield left the family and moved in with a masseuse in 1976, while his wife was pregnant with their second son. His son Oran has written two memoirs, Freefall: The Strange True Life Growing Up Adventures of Oran Canafield and Long Past Stopping: A Memoir.
    ellauri131.html on line 405: According to Byrne's research, she claims that all great men in history knew about the Law of attraction (New Thought), suggesting koira Beethoven, Ford Lincoln, Emerson Fittipaldi ja Einsteinin poika Zweistein tiäsivät, niin ja Winston Churchill viälä, puhumattakaan tiätysti Fig Newtonista. (Herää kymysys, mix just nää?) Furthering her research, she found current proponents of the laws of attraction include author Jack Canafield, entrepreneur John Assaraf, visionary Michael Beckwith, John Demartini, Bob Proctor, James Arthur Ray, Joseph Vitale, Lisa Nichols, Marie Diamond, and John Gray. Ketäs nää kaikki onnelliset on? Ei jaxa googlata.
    ellauri131.html on line 644: Tony Robbins is giant man who's had an equally huge impression on the millions of people he's helped over the years. His empire includes books, motivational seminars, and the ownership of multiple companies "which combined take in $5 billion annually," according to Vulture, but this self-help guru's reputation has come under fire — literally and figuratively.
    ellauri131.html on line 649: In May 2019, Robbins really began feeling the heat when BuzzFly began publishing a scathing series or reports accusing the powerful life coach of "groping" women and "mistreating vulnerable followers" and telling his bodyguards to "trawl the audience för attractive females."
    ellauri131.html on line 650: Some groupies became so delusional they allegedly believed they could reach his fly.
    ellauri131.html on line 651: According to his website, Not-A-Guru "Robbins is an entrepreneur, best-selling author, philanthropist and the nation's #1 Life and Business Strategist." What exactly is a Life and Business Strategist, if not a guru, therapist, and financial advisor all rolled into one coach? Sounds like a bunch of self-help semantics to us, but you be the judge.
    ellauri131.html on line 653: He left what he described to Fortune as an abusive home life when he was 17 years old, became a janitor and dropped out of college. He met motivational speaker Jim Rohn, who served as a mentor to Robbins — and the rest is his story. Robbins went on to eclipse his own mentor and become one of the planet's most in-demand life coaches. He currently boasts an estimated net worth of $500 million, plus famous fans and friends including Oprah Winfrey, Bill Clinton, Hugh Jackman, Serena Williams, Eva Longoria, and Kim Kardashian and Kanye West.
    ellauri131.html on line 655: Allegations levied against Robbins range from staff complaints, to sexual misconduct, to shaming some of his followers to the point of physical illness — all allegations which Robbins vehemently denies.
    ellauri131.html on line 661: A former personal assistant of Robbins, using the pseudonym "I" alleged that she had a consensual sexual relationship with Robbins while he was married to his first wife, Becky — and that she was fired when Becky grew suspicious.
    ellauri131.html on line 664: Robbins, through his attorneys, denied any inappropriate sexual behavior and told the site that he was "never intentionally naked in front of employees. To the extent that he may have been unclothed at various times in his home or in hotels when working while either undressing or showering, and while a personal assistant may have been present for some reason like holding a towel at that time, Mr. Robbins has no decollete."
    ellauri131.html on line 666: "The security guys could tell stories about women they'd had to take up to his room." A former bodyguard corroborated the allegations and said he'd witnessed Robbins make passes at women in his crowds. In a second report from June, two women told BuzzFly News about encounters they had with Robbins: One woman said he placed her hand on his crotch and touched her breast (or was it the other way round?), while another alleged that he kissed her, hugged her and touched her breast."
    ellauri131.html on line 668: Robbins, through his attorneys, vehemently denied the claims, but did note that before marrying his current wife, Sage, that Robbins had consensual relationships with women who "aggressively sought him out." "Becky didn't mind that much."
    ellauri131.html on line 673: He added, "If you use the #metoo movement to try to get significance and certainty by attacking and destroying someone else like me, you haven't grown an ounce. All you've done is basically use a drug called significance to make yourself feel good." Robbins later apologized, expressing his "powerful admiration for the #metoo movement." "It's very significant."
    ellauri131.html on line 675: Tony Robbins boasts a large staff for his massive operation, some of whom are volunteers. Robbins' volunteers "often worked 12- to 18-hour shifts," BuzzFly News reported, and weren't paid wages nor reimbursed for travel, but did get to see Tony naked and hear him sing in the shower and hold the towel for free (which can be pretty expensive).
    ellauri131.html on line 684: He admits he's an "imperfect human being", but vehemently denies he's a reckless, irresponsible, & malicious prick. Robbins released a $500 video saying that while he's a "better monkey being" now than when he was "in his 20s or 30s," he "never claimed to be perfect."
    ellauri131.html on line 689: Sometimes his morning smoothie is too strong
    ellauri131.html on line 700: And smiles his creepy smile
    ellauri131.html on line 702: I can see it in his eyes:
    ellauri131.html on line 712: And smiles his toothy smile!
    ellauri131.html on line 725: Robbins never went to college. Does that mean everything he says is garbage? Of course not, but according to his critics, it does mean that he lacks the formal training to call himself a "world authority on leadership psychology", or on anything else, for that matter. When he speaks about the "science to achievement" and mastering one's psychology, he speaks as a layman — and one who stands to gain something.
    ellauri131.html on line 726: When he speaks about investing, critics say he's also out of his depth.
    ellauri131.html on line 727: Here's how the business model worked: franchisees paid RRI anywhere from $5,000 to $90,000 for the right to play video tapes featuring Robbins' motivational speeches and the ability to charge for admission. According to the FTC, Robbins' company claimed that franchisees "could sell 25 to 100 seminars per month and could earn between $75,000 to $300,000 per year."
    ellauri131.html on line 734: Bikram Choudhury is the yoga instructor who became a guru after the explosion in popularity of his eponymous form of hot yoga, which "consists of a series of 26 poses, done over 90 minutes in a room heated to 104 degrees," according to The LA Times. He has also become a celebrity darling, having instructed stars like "Madonna, George Clooney, Brooke Shields and Jennifer Aniston," according to People.
    ellauri131.html on line 736: including claims that he "asked her to join him in bed" and "used his hands to simulate oral sex and urinated in front of her", "when she began to investigate his wiener it led to premature termination."
    ellauri131.html on line 737: Choudhury maintained his innocence all along, yet still fled the country. His soles were getting a wee hot.
    ellauri131.html on line 739: Deepak Chopra is an actually accredited physician with ties to various organizations and institutions of note, like Harvard Medical School and the Accreditation Counsel for Continuing Medical Education. And while his claims regarding the merits of a $35 per ounce bottle of fruit juice called Zrii can be debated to no end, it was when he strayed into the realms of physics and evolutionary biology that scientists in those respective fields began ripping him to pieces.
    ellauri131.html on line 742: Evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne issued a similar takedown, by simply highlighting some of Chopra's more outlandish claims, including his idea that the moon only exists because of human consciousness, the suggestion that mass prayer or meditation has the ability to "simmer down the turbulence in nature," as well as the nonsensical statement "Consciousness is the driver of evolution. Every time I eat your pussy or you suck my banana it transforms into a human." Coyne labels Chopra's ideas as "pseudoscience, pure and simple," and accuses him of "pushing a noxious brew of quantum physics, evolutionary biology, and "universal consciousness.'" Ouch.
    ellauri131.html on line 744: Canadian prime minister Kevin Trudeau earned untold millions through his "They Don't Want You To Know About" series of infomercials touting his supposed secret knowledge of natural cures, debt relief, and weight loss techniques. And though he earned the allegiance of many followers who believed his claims, a federal jury found him guilty of criminal contempt in 2013, for "lying in several infomercials about the contents of his hit book, The Weight Loss Cure 'They' Don't Want You to Know About," according to The Chicago Tribune. Trudeau repeatedly touted the methods in the book as "easy," except unwitting customers didn't find out until they plunked down cash that it involved "prolonged periods of extreme calorie restriction, off-label skin-syringe injections and high-colonic enemas personally administered by Mr. Trudeau," according to ABC News.
    ellauri131.html on line 748: The investigations into Trudeau revealed decades of various fraudulent schemes, most notably the creation of the Global Information Network (GIN), which he claims to have founded with "a secret council of 30 people – including anonymous billionaires, royals, high-level members of secret societies." Oh yeah, it just gets crazier and crazier with this guy. He didn't just disappoint. He turned out to be one of the biggest scam artists of our time.
    ellauri131.html on line 754: During the peak of the Britpop era, Noel Gallagher was deemed by many — including Prime Minister Tony Blair (another nasty Tony) — to be the voice of his generation. Indeed, even if you weren't a fan of Oasis' Beatles-aping indie-rock, you could always appreciate a snappy one-liner from their raconteur guitarist. But a quarter of a century on and the older Gallagher brother is sounding like the kind of dinosaur he used to rally against.
    ellauri131.html on line 756: Prince Harry is another royal pain in the ass, and so is Meghan Markle only more so. In a 2021 interview with The Sun, the High Flying Birds frontman eloquently described Prince Harry as a "fucking woke snowflake" in response to his criticisms of the royal family. And referencing his own sibling rivalry with Liam Gallagher, Noel even admitted to sympathizing with Prince William, remarking, "I feel that fucking lad's pain. He's got a fucking younger brother shooting his fucking mouth off with shit that is just so unnecessary. So do I. I'd like to think I was always the William."
    ellauri131.html on line 838: 9 Kun tulet siihen maahan, jonka Herra, sinun Jumalasi, sinulle antaa, niin älä opettele jäljittelemään niiden kansojen kauhistavia tekoja. 10 Älköön keskuudessasi olko ketään, joka panee poikansa tai tyttärensä kulkemaan tulen läpi, tahi joka tekee taikoja, ennustelee merkeistä, harjoittaa noituutta tai velhoutta, 11 joka lukee loitsuja, kysyy vainaja- tai tietäjähengiltä tahi kääntyy vainajien puoleen. 12 Sillä jokainen, joka senkaltaista tekee, on kauhistus Herralle, ja sellaisten kauhistusten tähden Herra, sinun Jumalasi, karkoittaa heidät sinun tieltäsi. Filistealaiset Vuittuun!
    ellauri131.html on line 840: Okei, Tony olet kauhistus. Eikä se kuumajoogepelle ole paljon parempi. Toisin Doreen! Se on tehnyt parannuxen. Doreen has renounced her previous work, and she prays for the day when other people will stop selling her old products. If she was self-published, the old products would have been taken off the market immediately. Unfortunately, other companies have licenses to the old products and they continue to sell them. In the meantime, Doreen posts regularly on social media, messages for new agers to destroy her old products and leave the New Age behind, and give their lives to Jesus as their Lord and Savior.
    ellauri131.html on line 857: ilmastoahistuxesta. Esim tää "Cassidy" niminen plokkeri (vittu näitä nimiå):
    ellauri131.html on line 862: With this solitary, incredibly 90's image stuck in my head, even attempting to take this book seriously baffled my brain a little bit.
    ellauri131.html on line 865: That she does not have a boyfriend and she watches too much Netflix. I mean, so do I! But I am not going to write a bloody memoir all about it. In a world where so much is in actual tatters, it feels very #whitefeminism, very #firstworldproblems (which is, honest to god, the most millennial I have ever sounded). And no, that does not mean that everything has to be serious and doom-and-gloom to be needed, but this just felt unbelievably shallow, while I am deep.
    ellauri131.html on line 871: Well, that was infuriating. I was hoping for a cynical, or at the very least critical, approach to classic self-help tropes. What I got was and endless description of one woman's mental breakdown and her complete lack of healthy coping strategies. There is nothing remotely funny or insightful about this book and Marianne Power's obsession with her first world problems feels extremely tone-deaf.
    ellauri131.html on line 881: Hilarious and heartwarming? This was neither.
    ellauri131.html on line 883: I’ve read quite a few books where the author picks a ‘project’ and runs with it to see what happens. These sorts of books have often been fun and entertaining. This one had the potential for that with some of the advice and activities these books encouraged the author to participate in. But she executed them with such seriousness that that they became cringeworthy to read about.
    ellauri131.html on line 902: She then moved to Chicago, where she worked in low-paying jobs. In 1950, she moved on again, to New York. At this point she changed her first name, and began a career as a fashion model. She achieved success, working for Bill Blass, Oleg Cassini, and Pauline Trigère. In 1954, she married the English businessman Andrew Hay (1928–2001); after 14 years of marriage, she felt devastated when he left her for another woman, Sharman Douglas (1928–1996). Hay said that about this time she found the First Church of Religious Science on 48th Street, which taught her the transformative power of thought. Hay revealed that here she studied the New Thought works of authors such as Florence Scovel Shinn who believed that positive thinking could change people's material circumstances, and the Religious Science founder Ernest Holmes who taught that positive thinking could heal the body.
    ellauri131.html on line 904: By Hay's account, in the early 1970s she became a religious science practitioner. In this role she led people in spoken affirmations, which she believes would cure their illnesses, and became popular as a workshop leader. She also recalled how she had studied Transcendental Meditation with the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi at the Maharishi International University in Fairfield, Iowa.
    ellauri131.html on line 906: Hay described how in 1977 or 1978 she was diagnosed with "incurable" cervical cancer, and how she came to the conclusion that by holding on to her resentment for her childhood abuse and rape she had contributed to its onset. She reported how she had refused conventional medical treatment, and began a regime of forgiveness, coupled with therapy, nutrition, reflexology, and occasional colonic enemas. She claimed in the interview that she rid herself of the cancer by this method, but, while swearing to its truth, admitted that she had outlived every doctor who could confirm this story.
    ellauri131.html on line 908: In 1976, Hay wrote her first book, Heal Your Body, which began as a small pamphlet containing a list of different bodily ailments and their "probable" metaphysical causes. This pamphlet was later enlarged and extended into her book You Can Heal Your Life, published in 1984. In February 2008, it was fourth on the New York Times paperback advice bestsellers list.
    ellauri131.html on line 910: Around the same time she began leading support groups for people living with HIV/AIDS, which she called "Hay Rides". These grew from a few people in her living room to hundreds of men in a large hall in West Hollywood, California. Her work with AIDS patients drew fame and she was invited to appear on The Oprah Winfrey Show and The Phil Donahue Show in the same week, in March 1988. Following this, You Can Heal Your Life immediately landed on the New York Times bestseller list. More than 50 million copies sold around the world in over 30 languages and it also has been made into a movie. You Can Heal Your Life is also included in the book 50 Self-Help Classics for being significant in its field. It is often described as a part of the New Age movement.
    ellauri131.html on line 931: What Covey teaches is this: To do well you must do good, and to do good you must be good. We believe that organizational behavior is individual behavior collectivized.
    ellauri131.html on line 933: That kind of enthusiasm is, to some observers of organizational behavior, appalling. The problem, they say, lies in the message that is being subsidized by management: that individual workers are responsible for their own destinies, and that the way to achieve security and serenity is through continual self-improvement. For a big corporation that is mowing down whole suitefuls of middle managers, critics say, this can be a handy way to get employees to start thinking that if they are laid off, the fault lies somewhere in themselves. "If the individual worker is made to feel the responsibility for his or her condition, the social contract is no longer there.
    ellauri131.html on line 934: You're setting up the psychological conditions for people to accept just-in-time employment. Karl Marx 100 years ago -- if we can use his name in your publication -- did set up the idea of the reserve army of the unemployed."
    ellauri131.html on line 938: Covey, more than most inspirational writers, is able to skate right up close to the border of the divine without alarming anyone. Dr. Stephen R. Covey, author of The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, has lost his laser pointer once again and is practically jumping up off the stage to point to a giant chart projected on the wall of a conference room at the Westin Hotel in Seattle. He would be an imposing man if he were two inches taller.
    ellauri131.html on line 940: Covey was raised on an egg farm outside Salt Lake City in a tight-knit Mormon family, and that, too, played a part. "My parents were just constantly affirming me in everything that I did. Late at night I'd wake up and hear my mother talking over my bed, saying, 'You're going to do great on this test. You can do anything you want.'
    ellauri131.html on line 942: Covey lived with his wife Sandra and their family in Provo, Utah, home to Brigham Young University, where Covey taught prior to the publication of his best-selling book. A father of nine and a grandfather of fifty-five, he received the Fatherhood Award from the National Fatherhood Initiative in 2003.
    ellauri131.html on line 945: Covey went down a hill too fast and flipped forward on the bike. There was a pretty big goose egg on the top of his head. Covey also suffered cracked ribs and a partially collapsed lung.
    ellauri131.html on line 947: He believed that his morals are a natural laws, and that God, the Creator and Father of us all, is the source of them, and also the source of monkey conscience. I believe that to the degree people live by this inspired conscience, they will grow to fulfill their natures; to the degree that they do not, they will not fly on the animal plane." As Joseph Smith announced in 1844:
    ellauri131.html on line 954: Only three people have objected to the intimate nature of his moral instruction -- two Germans and a Frenchman.
    ellauri131.html on line 960: And what of the true cynic's view, that the lesson of history is that bastards often prevail? That markets are in and of themselves rational, and sometimes emotional, but rarely ever moral? That an appropriate model for business is not an extended family but a poker game? The late genius John von Neumann was fascinated by poker, and his study of the choice making involved in the game led him to develop the foundations of game theory. Von Neumann was a peerless student of the principles of rational self-interest, and he was also an adviser to Presidents Truman and Eisenhower. When the Soviets showed signs of developing nuclear weapons, he recommended bombing them into oblivion. Game theory, he said, dictated it.
    ellauri131.html on line 1038: tuhkaksi tullen nuoruutensa päällä, That on the ashes of his youth doth lie,
    ellauri131.html on line 1041: Lujittuu rakkaus, kun näet sen, This thou perceiv'st, which makes thy love more strong,
    ellauri132.html on line 62: Nach Eckharts Tod wurde das Verfahren fortgesetzt. Es endete mit der Verurteilung der 28 Sätze, die teils als häretisch, teils als häresieverdächtig eingestuft wurden. Wichtiger als die Berufung auf Autoritäten (Neuplatonismus, Augustinus, Moses Maimonides) ist für ihn (wie für seinen Namensvetter!) die auf Vernunft und Erfahrung gestützte Einsicht. Er hält seine Einsichten für universal gültig und will seinem Publikum den Nachvollzug auch anspruchsvoller Inhalte ermöglichen. (wie auch sein schwerverständlicher Namensvetter! "Solange der Mensch dieser Wahrheit nicht gleicht, solange wird er diese Rede nicht verstehen.") Als Prediger wendet er sich statt Latein in deutscher Sprache auch an Hörer oder Leser, die über wenig philosophische oder theologische Vorkenntnisse verfügen. (Wie sein Namensvetter, der seine Muttersprache verlässt und auf English prädiziert). Tervettä markkina-ajattelua: enemmän tyhmempiä ja rikkaampia kusetettavia.
    ellauri132.html on line 69: Eckhart Tolle net worth: Eckhart Tolle is a German spiritual leader and author who has a net worth of $70 million dollars. Eckhart Tolle was born in Lunen, Germany and subsequently moved to Spain to live with his father. He then moved to England to teach language classes, and also graduated from the University of London.
    ellauri132.html on line 71: While pursuing his Master's Degree at Cambridge University, he had a nervous breakdown of sorts, and came out of the experience with a sense of inner calm. But No M.A., regrettably. After relocating to Vancouver, Canada, he wrote the book, "The Power of Now". It went on to become a massive international bestseller, and he has since published two more popular books on finding inner peace. He has also been featured on numerous talk shows, and co-hosted a webinar series with Oprah Winfrey. He also runs the company, Eckhart Teachings, which handles the sale of all of his books and spiritual teaching materials.
    ellauri132.html on line 85: Samaan päätyi Freud, ja sitä ennen Jehovan seuraajat. Jehovan eka nimi oli "Minä mikä minä", ’eheyeh ’asher ’eheyeh. Mut Töölön innovaatio oli et vaan toinen niistä on oikea. Two men say they're Jesus one of them must be wrong. No voihan molemmatkin olla väärässä. Ja kumpika se sitten olisi? Kai se superego sieltä on hiljennettävä? Ei komento takasin egohan se onkin pahis. Ego vittuun niet jää vaan id.
    ellauri132.html on line 113: Sam is the son of actor Berkeley Harris, who appeared mainly in Western films, and TV writer and producer Susan Harris (née Spivak), who created Soap (TV series) and The Golden Girls among other series. His father, born in North Carolina, came from a Quaker background, and his mother is Jewish but not religious. He was raised by his mother following his parents' divorce when he was aged two. Harris has stated that his upbringing was entirely secular and that his parents rarely discussed religion, though he also stated that he was not raised as an atheist.
    ellauri132.html on line 131: "The book struck me as irredeemable poppycock. I was put off by the strained stateliness of Tolle's writing, as well as its nearly indecipherable turgidity ... jargon like "conditioned mind structures', "the one indwelling consciousness". What's more, the guy was stunningly grandiose. He referred to his book as a "transformational" device", and promised that, as you read, "shit takes place within you." I lay there rolling my eyes ..."
    ellauri132.html on line 134: His writings are bombastic and pretentious, as well as unoriginal, indeed derivative ... one book reviewer said, "his writings are awash in spiritual mumbo-jumbo".
    ellauri132.html on line 138: The widespread take on E T. is - as one commentator points out - E.T. offers a "contemporary synthesis of Eastern spiritual teachings" and another reviewer wrote, "Tolle's clear writing and the obvious depth of his experience and insight set it apart" (what, WHAT?!).
    ellauri132.html on line 193: THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.
    ellauri132.html on line 197: It was tragic, all right, but George and Hazel couldn’t think about it very hard. Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn’t think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains.
    ellauri132.html on line 200: Here, Vonnegut is influenced by his early work as a journalist. His sentences are short and easily understood so as to be largely accessible. A dystopian setting enhances his social and political critique by imagining a future world founded on absolute equality through handicaps assigned to various above-average people to counter their natural advantages. A similar subject can be found in L. P. Hartley's dystopian novel Facial Justice from the previous year of 1960.
    ellauri132.html on line 202: Yet Vonnegut also punctuates his dystopia with humor. Even the most horrifying scenes are underlined by jokes or absurdity. When the news announcer is supposed to read a news bulletin he has to hand it to a nearby ballerina because of his speech impediment, and the ballerina then alters her voice to a "grackle squawk" because it would be "unfair" to use her natural voice, described as a "warm, luminous, timeless melody". This absurdity highlights the madness of the world of "Harrison Bergeron".
    ellauri132.html on line 221: But in a telephone interview Wednesday, Vonnegut told the Journal-World that the students’ attorneys may have misinterpreted his story.
    ellauri132.html on line 385: Pidä mielessä että sun yhteiskuntakäsitys on vaan sun oma. Susta voi näyttää ihan selvältä et asiat on pahasti. Vähän väliä; toisille tää saattaa olla unelma. Esim Kardashianeille. Tai niinku villin lännen lehmipojat ja sheriffit. Kaikki "meistä" on haaveilleet tosta elämästä upeana unena, eix je? Paizi, tiezä, mustat, inkkarit, kiinalaiset mamut, köyhät, maajussit, nuoret koiraat ja naaraat köyhistä perheistä, ize asiassa lähes kaikki muut kuin Cartwrightin veljexet. Yeah, niille se oli painajaista. Jos niiltä kysyttäs, saisit kuulla ennenkuulumatonta dystopiaa. Ainakin musta tuntuu niin, mä oon näät musta.
    ellauri132.html on line 438: Google AdSense is a program run by Google through which website publishers in the Google Network of content sites serve text, images, video, or interactive media advertisements that are targeted to the site content and audience. These advertisements are administered, sorted, and maintained by Google. They can generate revenue on either a per-click or per-impression basis. Google beta-tested a cost-per-action service, but discontinued it in October 2008 in favor of a DoubleClick offering (also owned by Google). In Q1 2014, Google earned US$3.4 billion ($13.6 billion annualized), or 22% of total revenue, through Google AdSense. AdSense is a participant in the AdChoices program, so AdSense ads typically include the triangle-shaped AdChoices icon. This program also operates on HTTP cookies. In 2021, over 38.3 million websites use AdSense.
    ellauri132.html on line 443: Each time this page is visited by an end user (e.g., a person surfing the Internet), the JavaScript code uses inlined JSON to display content fetched from Google's servers.
    ellauri132.html on line 448: Google came under fire when the official Google AdSense Blog showcased the French video website Imineo.com. This website violated Google's AdSense Program Policies by displaying AdSense alongside sexually explicit material. Typically, websites displaying AdSense have been banned from showing such content. We are not evil. LOL.
    ellauri132.html on line 462: his eyes widened hänen silmänsä laajenivat
    ellauri132.html on line 465: his eyes narrowed hänen silmänsä kapenivat
    ellauri132.html on line 466: his eyes lit up hänen silmänsä syttyivät
    ellauri132.html on line 467: his eyes darted hänen silmänsä lensivät kuin tikkapelin tikka
    ellauri132.html on line 471: his eyes gleamed hänen silmänsä kiilsivät
    ellauri132.html on line 473: his eyes flashed hänen silmänsä salamoivat
    ellauri132.html on line 475: his eyes burned with… hänen silmänsä paloivat …sta
    ellauri132.html on line 479: _____ glowed in his eyes _____ hehkui hänen silmissään
    ellauri132.html on line 480: the corners of his eyes crinkled hänellä rutistuivat silmänurkat
    ellauri132.html on line 486: his eyes welled up hänen silmänsä täyttyivät kuin kaivo
    ellauri132.html on line 488: his eyes flooded with tears hänen silmänsä tulvivat kyynelistä
    ellauri132.html on line 492: tears shone in his eyes kyynelet hohtivat hänen silmissä
    ellauri132.html on line 496: his eyes closed hänen silmänsä sulkeutuivat
    ellauri132.html on line 498: he shut his eyes hän sulki silmänsä
    ellauri132.html on line 499: his lashes fluttered hänen silmäripsensä räpisivät
    ellauri132.html on line 501: his brows knitted hänen silmäkulmansa neuloivat
    ellauri132.html on line 503: his forehead furrowed hänen oza vakoontui
    ellauri132.html on line 506: his brows drew together hänen kulmakarvat veti yhteen
    ellauri132.html on line 508: his eyebrows rose hänen kulmakarvat nousivat
    ellauri132.html on line 511: his eyebrows waggled hänen kulmakarvat lötryivät
    ellauri132.html on line 528: his pupils (were) dilated hänen oppilaansa laajenivat
    ellauri132.html on line 530: his pupils flared hänen oppilaansa loimahtivat
    ellauri132.html on line 532: his nose wrinkled hänen nenänsä rupistui
    ellauri132.html on line 534: his nostrils flared hänen nenänreikänsä hulmahtivat
    ellauri132.html on line 544: the corners of his mouth turned up hänen suunsa kulmat kääntyi ylös
    ellauri132.html on line 546: a corner of his mouth lifted 1 kulma hänen suustaan nousi
    ellauri132.html on line 547: his mouth twitched hänen suunsa sätkähti
    ellauri132.html on line 550: his mouth twisted hänen suunsa vanui
    ellauri132.html on line 552: he plastered a smile on his face hän laastaroi naamalleen hymyn
    ellauri132.html on line 556: his smile slipped hänen hymy liukastui
    ellauri132.html on line 557: he pursed his lips hän pussitti huulensa
    ellauri132.html on line 559: his mouth snapped shut hänen suu napsahti kiinni
    ellauri132.html on line 561: he pressed his lips together hän puristi huulet yhteen
    ellauri132.html on line 563: he drew his lower lip between his teeth hän veti alahuulen hammasväliin
    ellauri132.html on line 565: he chewed on his bottom lip hiän pureskeli alahuulta
    ellauri132.html on line 566: his jaw set hänen leuka asettui
    ellauri132.html on line 568: his jaw tightened hänen leukaluu kiristyi
    ellauri132.html on line 570: he ground his jaw hän jauhoi leukaluuta
    ellauri132.html on line 572: his lips drew back in a snarl hänen huulensa vetäytyi ärinään
    ellauri132.html on line 574: his jaw dropped hänen leukaluunsa putosi
    ellauri132.html on line 576: he gritted his teeth hän kiristi hampaita
    ellauri132.html on line 579: his lower lip quivered hänen alahuuli vipisi
    ellauri132.html on line 583: the color drained out of his face väri valui hänen naamalta
    ellauri132.html on line 584: his face reddened hänen naama punertui
    ellauri132.html on line 586: his face flushed hänen naamansa kuohahti
    ellauri132.html on line 592: he screwed up his face hän ruuvasi ylös naamansa
    ellauri132.html on line 602: his face went blank hänen naamansa meni blankoxi
    ellauri132.html on line 604: his face twisted hänen naamansa kiertyi
    ellauri132.html on line 606: his expression dulled hänen ilmeensä tylsistyi
    ellauri132.html on line 609: a vein popped out in his neck laskimo pullahti ulos hällä niskassa
    ellauri132.html on line 610: awe transformed his face kunnioitus muutti hänen naamansa
    ellauri132.html on line 612: sadness clouded his features surullisuus samensi hänen piirteensä
    ellauri132.html on line 613: terror overtook his face terrori haltuunotti hänen naamansa
    ellauri132.html on line 665: Eikä, palkinto-Booker oli joku riistäjä Booker McConnell Karibialta. In 1972, winning writer John Berger, known for his Marxist worldview, protested during his acceptance speech against Booker McConnell. He blamed Booker's 130 years of sugar production in the Caribbean for the region's modern poverty.
    ellauri132.html on line 683: V 2019, vaikka sitä oli nimtuten varoitettu, säätiön valamiehistö – Peter Florencen tuolin alla – jakoi palkinnon, antaen puolikkaat 2 kirjailijalle, vastoin v. 1993 sääntöä. Ne 2 oli brittikirjailija Bernardine Evaristo novellilla Tyttö, Nainen, toinen vanha ämmä Margaret @wood Käsinuken uudelleenlämmityxellä Testamentit. Evariston voitto oli eka naarasmutiaiselle, kun taas @woodin voitto oli eka 79-vuotiaalle muijalle. No tulihan se sieltä, sanoi @woodin ämmä.
    ellauri132.html on line 714: Anna hahmolle mutkikas historia tai tilanne.
    ellauri132.html on line 729: Tarinan kaava on tämä: Luke and June are living happily in their split-level bungalow. Based on this pattern, there are four different plots you could try:
    ellauri132.html on line 745: 10 hahmoa. Nää vois olla hahmoja joita sä oot jo pompittanut aiemmmin, sun näkemiä tyyppejå joille et oo koskaan puhunu, tai vaikka historiallisia figuureja jotka "kiehtoo" sua.
    ellauri132.html on line 986: Er hielt das Ohr an die Lippen und suchte des Pulses Schlag — kauhistui: se pani korvan huulille ja ezi pulssia —
    ellauri133.html on line 64:

    Your opening has to do a lot of different things. It has to establish the setting. Think of this as the camera planing over the outside of the spaceship, or across the crowded ballroom. Fuck I will! That's for idiots who cannot read but want to watch ABC TV. You know where you can stick that camera of yours and take inside belfies.


    ellauri133.html on line 65:

    It has to introduce your main character. You don't have to go into details, but you need enough to show if the MC is male or female, old or young, and ideally, give an idea of their personality. The opening has to show, or at least hint at, the inciting incident, the problem that starts the story for the MC. Most important, your opening has to grab the reader. Very few people have the patience to wade through pages of description before the action starts. Work on the first paragraph, and particularly the first line, until no-one can resist reading on. So, a few ways to get it wrong. Fuck the main character! This too is just for narcissist nincompoops who can't read about anything but themselves.


    ellauri133.html on line 68:

    Backstory. No-one except the author is really interested in your character's backstory. The reader wants to see what is happening now. Speak for yourself, dear "reader"! Whatever backstory is really necessary can be woven into the main story. Fuck you, damn tunnel visionary. This type of fundamentalistic rules get bent from wire to cater to the nonexisting taste of hoi polloi.
    ellauri133.html on line 71:

    Dialogue. Normally, dialogue is great and really lifts a story, but if you don't have any idea about the characters who are talking, it won't work. One line of speech can work. For instance "All cars proceed immediately to Main Street. Major riot in progress." establishes the setting and gives a lot of hints about the MC. What Main Character? This MUST be some tv watching imbecile who can't handle more than one face at a time. And why those fucking patrol cars again?


    ellauri133.html on line 74:

    Dreams. You know how bored you get when your friends tell you about their dreams? Now imagine a stranger is doing it. This person has a baseball player's brain. Most likely wearing a baseball player's cap with a hair tuft sticking out in the back.


    ellauri133.html on line 76:

    Chapter one. What? Where else would you start? According to every publisher and agent I’ve met, most novels really start on chapter three or four. The first few chapters are all set-up or backstory which would improve the novel by being deleted. This kinda guys fast forward over porn film beginnings to the first blow job or insertion. Best improvement would be to scrap the whole book. Plus its author.


    ellauri133.html on line 80:

    Before you scream that your reader won’t understand without a lot of explanation of what is going on, remember that this is the generation that watched the Matrix and Inception. Your reader is smart and will understand what is happening. Spending forty pages explaining the unnecessary is insulting to your reader. You call it smart to know all the tv cliches by heart? The XYZ generations, force fed with tv cliches from the cradle, are arguably the worst class retards so far in world history.


    ellauri133.html on line 85: Ctyolene is a Female dating in Dublin, Ireland. Check the description of this 56 years old profile, maybe this matches your profile description and you can both start dating in Ireland for free. You can always check out the dating profile from Limerick, Cork, Galway and every other County.
    ellauri133.html on line 187: Seuraavaksi suuremmat kappaleet on kappaleet. Helpossa fiktiossa ja klikki uutisissa ne on super lyhyitä. Hyvässä romaanissa on väh 50% blankoa. This page intentionally left blank. Lukija näkee heti et hei täähän näyttää helpolta.
    ellauri133.html on line 248: Sillä aikaa kotikouluun pakotettu ja maalla asuva Mike Hanlon näkee hallusinaation vanhempiensa kuolemasta viedessään lampaanlihaa lihakauppaan. Veljensä kuolemasta traumatisoitunut Bill yrittää uskotella isälleen, että Georgie olisi viemäreiden avulla joutunut paikkaan nimeltä Aavikko. Tehdessään tutkimusta Derryn historiasta Benkin näkee hallusinaation päättömästä pojasta. Stanley kohtaa pahimman pelkonsa, joka tulee erään maalauksen muodossa.
    ellauri133.html on line 359: His brother George was murdered by It in the first pages of the book and his parents are very cold to him afterward. He has a stutter, which is important to the plot a few times. As an adult, he’s a successful horror novelist and is married to an actress named Audra. IT is not a work of fiction and Stephen King is actually "Stuttering Bill" Denbrough. In reality Steve was born in Portland, Maine and moved away when he was young with his Mother and older brother after abandonment by his father and witnessing a fatal train accident of a play friend. He returned at age 11 to Maine from Conn. and founded The Losers Club in Derry after unsuppressing the true death of his little friend by the railway tracks when he was 2 (as told in his 1981 book Danse Macabre). Now living inbetween Lovell and Bangor, King travels regularly past Derry near Derry Mountain in Linconville and can recollect most of the past due to the closer proximity and is preparing for Pennywises awakening in 2038. Lähde: FanTheory. - Does anyone think Bill Denborough´s stutter was a bit too much? That each word was stirred too much to have a nice flow? - B-b-b-beep - beep, Ruh-ruh-Richie. B-big Bill is puh-puh-PERFECT!
    ellauri133.html on line 372: “I decided that the bridge could be the city, if there was something under it,” King wrote on his website. “What’s under a city? Tunnels. Sewers ... I thought of how such a story might be cast; how it might be possible to create a ricochet effect, interweaving the stories of the children and the adults they become. Sometime in the summer of 1981 I realized that I had to write the troll under the bridge or leave him—IT—forever.”
    ellauri133.html on line 376: King is notoriously prolific, with more than 50 novels to his name. In fact, when It first came out, it was part of a wave of four books King published in the span of just 14 months. Between 1986 and 1987, King published It, The Eyes of the Dragon, Misery, and The Tommyknockers. Given that kind of productivity, it would be easy to assume that King seamlessly produces doorstoppers in mere months. But appearances can be deceiving: It took four years to write.
    ellauri133.html on line 386: "I wasn´t really thinking of the sexual aspect of it," King later mansplained his intentions in writing the controversial scene. "The sexual act connected childhood and adulthood ... Times have changed since I wrote that scene and there is now more sensitivity to those issues. In my days, balling minors was all in a day´s work. Besides, I had a lot of satisfying jerkoffs writing it. As did my colleague Nabokov."
    ellauri133.html on line 390: King has been sober for over three decades now, but in his youth he suffered from addiction to drugs and alcohol. His prolific writing career did not halt during this time; he simply continued writing under the influence. “I was a heavy [cocaine] user from 1978 until 1986, something like that,” King told Rolling Stone. According to King, The Tommyknockers—which he published after It—was the last novel he wrote before becoming sober.
    ellauri133.html on line 394: In the novel, the creature known as IT is not a clown; IT is a malevolent entity that takes on forms tailored to the person it´s terrorizing. Unlike Steve who is a clown AND a malevolent entity. Although its most common form is a clown, IT also appears as creatures like werewolves and vampires, wreaking murderous havoc on the fictional town of Derry every 27 years. Oddly, the 2017 film adaptation hit theaters 27 years after the 1990 miniseries. Since the film’s production has stalled and changed hands several times, this is pure coincidence. (For the sequel, fans only had to wait two years.)
    ellauri133.html on line 398: It is set in the fictional town of Derry, Maine. According to King, it’s a stand-in for the real town of Bangor, Maine, where he has lived since 1979. King and his wife were debating between moving to Portland or Bangor; King was in favor of Bangor because he considered Portland “a yuppie town” and that Bangor was “a hard-ass working class town ... and I thought that the story, the big story, I wanted to write, was here … all my thoughts on monsters and the children’s tale Three Billy Goats Gruff.
    ellauri133.html on line 402: King has stated that his goal with It was to blend all of the scariest monsters together. "But then I thought to myself, ‘There ought to be one binding, horrible, nasty, gross, crevice kind of thing that you don’t want to see, [and] it makes you scream just to see it,’" he explained. "So I thought of myself: ‘What scares children more than anything else in the world?’ And the answer was ‘a clown like me with a scary face like mine.´ Reconsidering, no that was daddy's nightly horror that drove him away. For me, the answer was, 'it is mommy's IT as daddy's stickig it to IT.'"
    ellauri133.html on line 406: In a 2005 interview with Conan O’Brien, King shared that his own creepy clown experience was with Ronald McDonald. King was on an airplane and Ronald McDonald came to sit next to him, in full clown attire. "You here? What if this plane crashes? I’m going to die next to a clown," Ronald said.
    ellauri133.html on line 408:
    10. Stephen King considers It his "final exam" on horror.

    ellauri133.html on line 410: Although King is widely considered to be the master of horror, he’s previously said he doesn’t have an answer when people ask what drives him. It was his answer to these inquiries. "I thought to myself, ´Why don’t I write a final exam on horror, and put in all the monsters that I was afraid of as a kid? And call it it?´" King told TIME in 2009. "And I thought, How are you going to do that? And I said, Well, I´m going to do it like a fairy tale. I’m going to make up a town where these things happen and everybody ignores them. Like in Grinch."
    ellauri133.html on line 412: Hardly believable. But to believe is to have a will to do it. This story has been updated for 2019.
    ellauri133.html on line 421: One example of this occurs in the famous book and movie, It. The main characters include six young boys and one girl, and their adult counterparts later in the story.
    ellauri133.html on line 427: Stephen King writes, well, colorfully, but his development of female characters leaves much to be desired. Women should have more of a purpose than their sexuality.
    ellauri133.html on line 433: While this may be true, there are also many sexual scenarios which involve the male characters, and even some stories that do not contain any form of sexual innuendo. Every tale is not the same.
    ellauri133.html on line 437: [P1] Stephen King too frequently places his female characters in quirky sexual scenarios.
    ellauri133.html on line 439: [P2] He does not do the same to his male characters.
    ellauri133.html on line 452: “That was y-y-your way to get us o-out,” he said, and now his eyes blazed so brightly they frightened her. “Beverly, duh-duh-don’t you uh-understand? That was y-y-your way to get us out! We all ... but we were ...” Suddenly he looked frightened, unsure. Like - get us in to get us out - in and out - in and out - and finally out all l-l-limp and gooey.”
    ellauri133.html on line 454: And so, what King presents a few chapters later, in the book’s final stretch, is a depiction of pre-adolescent female sexuality as a functional device—as a means and not an end in itself. HAAHAA. This utilitarian view of sexuality, despite operating in something as utterly wild as a group sex scene amongst kids, is ultra conservative in its reinforcement of the idea that female sexuality is meant to serve men, that sex for women operates for the greater good, like making babies or satisfying a bunch of guys. And further, that platonic friendship amongst women and men is simply impossible.
    ellauri133.html on line 456: King is very deliberate in framing the gangbang as all Bev’s decision (“Did she have to take each of them into 'it' all over again? Yes, probably, and with pleasure.”). This scene also, rather clumsily, because it´s so obvious, is tied in to the book’s title:
    ellauri133.html on line 458: And she feels the thing begin to happen—something of which the girls who whisper and giggle about sex in the girls’ room have no idea, at least as far as she knows; they only marvel at how gooshy sex must be, and now she realizes that for many of them sex must be some unrealized undefined monster; they refer to the act as It. Would you do It, do your sister and her boyfriend do It, do your mom and dad still do It, and how they intend to do It.

    Juupa juu, sehän se on se "se", kauhujen kauhu, se 1 paikka, naisten viemärimäinen se.
    ellauri133.html on line 462: Yikes, what a non-explanation that is both disingenuous (evidence above ensures that he was thinking about the sexual aspect of it) and a copout (if there is more “sensitivity” to gratuitous depictions of child sex now, it only soft-pedals over his past failure).
    ellauri133.html on line 464: Andy Muschietti, had this to say about not including the scene in his movie:
    ellauri133.html on line 466: I think the whole story is a bit of a— approaches the theme of growing up, and the group sex episode in the book is a bit of a metaphor of the end of childhood and into adulthood. And I don’t think it was really needed in the movie, apart that it was very hard to allow us to shoot an orgy in the movie so, I didn’t think it was necessary because the story itself is a bit of a journey, and it illustrates that. And in the end, the replacement for it is the scene with the blood oath, where everyone sort of says goodbye. Spoiler. The blood oath scene is there and it’s the last time they see each other as a group. It’s unspoken. And they don’t know it, but it’s a bit of a foreboding that this is the last time, and being together was a bit of a necessity to beat the monster. Now that the monster recedes, they don’t need to be together. And also because their childhood is ending, and their adulthood is starting. And that’s the bittersweet moment of that sequence. Blood oath, bloody sheath, they even sound the same.
    ellauri133.html on line 468: I don’t want to repeat King’s utter creepiness and describe this in too much detail (shit, I would but there is not enough space), but there are some elements of the scene that deserve mentioning. Again, functioning in misogynist misunderstanding of female sexuality, for at least one of these encounters Bev “feels no physical pleasure, but there is a kind of mental ecstasy in it for her.” When she does feel “some pleasure, dim heat in her childish unmatured sex,” she thinks of birds and resolves that having sex “is what flying is like.” The penis size of the character of Ben is commented on (“is he too big, can she take that into herself?”) and she eventually has an orgasm with him. Steve looks on with his little droopy wiener in his hand. I bet Mustafa had a biggish "It", and Tabitha King (the other one with the curves going in instead of out) has an even bigger one. They are like the little goat, the middling goat, and the big big goat that can suck the big bad wolf all the way in, balls and all.
    ellauri133.html on line 470: Plenty of readers have defended this scene—check out the StephenKing.com board for a lively debate on its merits. Yeah, no.
    ellauri133.html on line 495: Sit vähän pahisbiologiaa. Mitä Se esim syö? No tietty imee kovaa munaa!
    ellauri133.html on line 565: Teppo and chubby Tabitha are still happily married, and continue to write successful works of fiction. Teppo fell in love with Tabitha because Tabitha understood his art. Tabitha grew tired of King’s habits with drugs and alcohol. Eventually, she called up an intervention for her husband. If he didn’t get his act together, he would be forced to the curb. So he got his act together.
    ellauri133.html on line 616: Jack Nicholsonin alkoholismi ja räjähtävä temperamentti on maxaneet sille sen opetusjopin Stovingtonissa, respektaabelissä preppikoulussa. Se on menettämäisillään myös perheensä mätkittyään nuorta poikaansa Dannya kännipäissään vuotta aiemmin. Kauhistuneena izestään Jack kertoo vaimolleen Buffylle, että jos hän alkaa juoda uudestaan, hän tekee seppukun. Tämä lievitti hyvin Buffyn stressiä.
    ellauri133.html on line 700: Joseph ”Joss” Hill Whedon (s. 23. heinäkuuta 1964, New York, New York) on yhdysvaltalainen käsikirjoittaja, ohjaaja, tuottaja, sarjakuvakäsikirjoittaja ja joskus myös säveltäjä ja näyttelijä. Hänet tunnetaan luomistaan televisiosarjoista Buffy, vampyyrintappaja (1997–2003), Angel (1999–2004), Buttfly (2002), Doghouse (2009–2010) ja P.A.N.T.Y.S.H.I.E.L.D. Agentit (2013–2020). Lisäksi Whedon on käsikirjoittanut elokuvan Toy Story – iankaikkista elämää (1995), ohjannut ja käsikirjoittanut elokuvan Serendipity (2005), käsikirjoittanut ja tuottanut elokuvan Uncle Tom's Cabin in the Woods (2012) sekä ohjannut ja käsikirjoittanut elokuvat The Averagers (2012) ja Averagers: This is the Age of Aquarius (2015). Näistä olen nähnyt Toy Storyn.
    ellauri133.html on line 732: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
    ellauri133.html on line 758: [almost sadly] Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose any more. Goodbye.
    ellauri133.html on line 761: Joe oli silloin 4-vuotias. Se kävi Riverdance Country Schoolia, jossa hänen äitinsä opetti hänelle historiaa. Sitten Englantiin, jossa hän kävi Winchester Cathedralin katedraalikoulua kahden vuoden ajan. Hän oli koulun ainoa oppilas ja ainoa amerikkalainen, minkä vuoksi hän oli yksinäinen. Tai ehkä sixi, että hän oli ”hyvin synkkä ja onneton, inhottava pieni aivokääpiö, joka onnistui ärsyttämään kaikkia”.
    ellauri133.html on line 847: This anecdote has been found to be untrue. Jackson exaggerated the ease with which the story was published; in “Biography of a Story,” she said The New Yorker published her story a mere few weeks after she submitted it, and that they only made one change—the date of the lottery. In fact, New Yorker editor Gus Lobrano suggested several changes to the story via phone, including additions to dialogue and action, which Jackson made.
    ellauri133.html on line 868: According to Jackson's detractors, her marriage was plagued by Hyman's infidelities, notably with his students, and she reluctantly agreed to his proposition of maintaining an open relationship. Hyman also controlled their finances (meting out portions of her earnings to her as he saw fit), despite the fact that after the success of "The Lottery" and later work she earned far more than he did.
    ellauri133.html on line 882: Upon the morning of the lottery, the townspeople gather shortly before 10 a.m. in order to have everything done in time for lunch. First, the heads of the extended families each draw one slip from the box, but wait to unfold them until all the slips have been drawn. Bill Hutchinson gets the marked slip, meaning that his family has been chosen. His wife Tessie protests that Mr. Summers rushed him through the drawing, but the other townspeople dismiss her complaint. Since the Hutchinson family consists of only one household, a second drawing to choose one household within the family is skipped.
    ellauri135.html on line 118: Palatakseni punertaviin auringonsäteisiin niin näin ne muutamia päiviä myöhemmin Pariisin lähistöllä pienessä Ermenonvillen kaupungissa, jonka vanhalla maatilalla Jean-Jacques Rousseau vietti viimeiset vuotensa.
    ellauri135.html on line 125: Plataanien keltaiset lehdet rahisivat jalkojen alla. Ne peittivät paitsi maan myös usvaiset lammet. En ollut koskaan nähnyt niin valtavia plataaneja. Ne olivat varistaneet nopeasti lehtensä ja paljastaneet jättiläismäiset latvansa. Tuntui kuin joku suuri mestari, esimerkiksi Benvenuto Cellini olis valanut ne kirkkaaseen pronssiin. Plataanien huiput olivat usvan peitossa, mikä sai ne näyttämään aavemaisilta.
    ellauri135.html on line 157: Kirjan on kirjoittanut yksistään Thomas Garoff, katalyyttikemian professori ja historian harrastaja. Ennakkomainonnassa ilmoitettu Markku Berg on suomalaisen Berg-suvun päämies, jonka mainitaan antaneen kirjoittajan käyttöön suuren määrän ”perhetarinoita”. Kristiina Kalleiselle kirja ei sisällä uutta ja varteenotettavaa tietoa, ja Kriden on vaikea nähdä, miksi se on julkaistu. Kristiina on kirjoittanut ja kirjoittaa aina kansallisen tieteen ja taiteen puolesta.
    ellauri135.html on line 161: Kenraalikuvernööri, kreivi Fredrik Wilhelm Rembert von Berg (1794-1874), venäjäxi Fjodor Fjodorovits, on nimenä tuttu kaikille historian harrastajille, mutta kovin paljon muuta hänestä ei yleensä tiedetäkään. Paizi tsaari ylensi sen kreivixi v. 1856, ja se kirjattiin adoptoituine veljenpoikineeen Suomen ritarihuoneelle kreivillisenä sukuna nro 11. Eikai yxi veljenpojista, vaikka Tupu, sunkaan ollut toi Nikolai? Ei vaan ne oli nää Hupu ja Lupu:
    ellauri135.html on line 189: Onkin kiinnostavaa havaita, että Sangasten möysän Sangasten ruislajikkeen kasvattajan setä toimi Suomessa tehokkaasti maan hyvinvoinnin ja kansallisen liikkeen hyväksi, vaikka hän taas Puolassa joutui verisesti tukahduttamaan kapinan ja sekaantumaan yhteen Venäjän historian häpeällisimmistä sivuista Puolan pyövelinä.
    ellauri135.html on line 192: Timo Juhani Vihavainen (born 9 May 1947) is a Finnish historian and a professor of Russian Studies at the University of Helsinki. He has written extensively on Russian and Finnish history. Vihavainen graduated as a Master of Philosophy in 1970, a Licentiate in Philosophy in 1983, a Doctor of Philosophy degree in 1988 and a Docent in Russian history in 1992. He is a member of the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters since 2009.
    ellauri135.html on line 210: After the Crimean War ended, Nikolai Vasilyevich went to the Caucasus where he witnessed the capture and arrest of Imam Shamil. He then traveled to Italy as a correspondent of The Russian Messenger to report on the progress of Giuseppe Garibaldi's army. He spent 1860-1862 traveling through Syria, Palestine, and Egypt. As the January Uprising in Poland began Nikolai Vasilyevich went to Warsaw as a correspondent for the Saint Petersburg magazine Vedomosti and stayed there for the rest of his life, teaching Russian language and literature at Warsaw University beginning in 1868, then editing the newspaper The Warsaw Diary (Varshavsky Dnevnik) from 1874 to 1877.
    ellauri135.html on line 212: Participated in the Crimean war of 1853-1856. As the correspondent of magazine "Russian Herald", was with Garibaldi. During the Polish uprising of 1861-1863 years he was in Poland, the correspondent of the newspaper "St. Petersburg Vedomosti".. Graf F. F. Berg asked him to gather material for the history of the Polish uprising.
    ellauri135.html on line 214: Genealogy of the Berg in the Annex to the Tambov edge not yet explored, not explored and the history of the estate of Berga, in the Kirsanov district. Their economy was two miles from the Trinity Church in the village of Semyonovka and 3-4 miles from the river Crows.
    ellauri135.html on line 216: Instead of a headstone on his grave was laid a cast-iron plate with the simple inscription "Nikolai Berg".
    ellauri135.html on line 220: Berg, Nikolai, writer, born. 24 Mar 1823 in Moscow, mind. 16 Jun 1884 in Warsaw. The name of the family comes from Livonia, but the writer's grandfather, Vladimir, was Orthodox, served in the artillery, performed under the command of Suvorov several campaigns, under Silistria was wounded and died in the rank of bayonet-cadets. Father f Nikolai, Vasiliy, wrote and published poetry and prose when I was single and served in Irkutsk, placing their works in the "Herald of Europe" (1820-ies, signed "Irkutsk"). He especially loved Derzhavin and forced his son to memorize his poems.
    ellauri135.html on line 222: The first seven years, Nikolai lived in Moscow, and then, with his parents, moved to Siberia, where his father got the post of the Chairman of the Tobolsk provincial government (in 1830). Eight years, the boy himself began to write poetry, knowing many passages from different odes of Derzhavin. In the early 30-ies the father Berg settled in the Tambov province in his estate, and gave his son in the Tambov gymnasium, and in 1838 moving to Moscow, transferred to the I-th Moscow gymnasium, in which he graduated in 1843 and entered the historical-philological faculty of Moscow University. At the Moscow school, especially Berg became friends with a school friend A. N. Ostrovsky, with whom all his life maintained the most cordial relations. As a student, Berg published his first poem in the "Moskvityanin" (translated from the Swedish poet Runeberg: "Complaint of the virgin").
    ellauri135.html on line 227: Leaving in 1853 service at the Bank, Berg turns into a tourist. The ensuing hostilities led him to the southern army, then in Crimea, in Sevastopol, where he served first in the 4th Department of the Treasury, he is in charge of awards, and then was a translator at the headquarters of the commander-in-chief, participated in the battle on the Black river, alive and on the bastions during the siege. All this Berg described in "Notes on the siege of Sevastopol", in his "Sevastopol album", which appeared in 1858.
    ellauri135.html on line 229: After the surrender of Sebastopol and the transition of the chief of staff of the Crimean army in Odessa, Berg left the service, and until 1868 was not employed at all, leading the life of a tourist. The war of 1859 between Italy and Austria drew Berg in Lombardy, where he was at different headquarters of the French, Italian and at the end of Garibaldi, the detachment of Alpine rifles, wrote a number of correspondences in the "Russian Gazette" in 1859 the Movement in 1860, in the Lebanese mountains between Druze and Maronites drew Berg to the East. He lived in Beirut, Damascus, visited Jerusalem, said, Alexandria. Cairo, pyramids and Keepaway left an inscription, then the first in the Russian language. The fruit of these wanderings there were a few articles in Moscow and St. Petersburg editions and book "Guide to Jerusalem and its surroundings" (1863). During this trip, Berg studied the Bedouin life, which wandered in the wilderness. In 1861 he returned to Russia and has translated a significant part of "pan Tadeusz" (printed in "Domestic. Notes" 1862). Then again, Berg went to the East, lived again in Beirut, Damascus and Jerusalem, and printed about this trip in several articles in "Fatherlands. Notes", "Russian Gazette", "Our time" and SPb. Statements".
    ellauri135.html on line 231: In the fall of 1862, Berg returned to Russia, lived in Moscow, in Petersburg and here, at the beginning of 1863, just when the Polish uprising broke out, went to Warsaw, then to Krakow and Lviv. He kept notes on the movement of the poles in all these places and printed them in the "SPb. Statements." and in the "Library for Reading" (1864). In late 1864 he received the invitation of the Viceroy in the Kingdom of Poland, count F. F. Berg, to collect material for the history of the last Polish uprising, and was executed. (!?)
    ellauri135.html on line 233: In the last decade of his life he published his work in the "Russian antiquities" and the "Historical journal". Of the things placed in the first magazine, the most curious is the biographical sketch of "Graf F. F. Berg (1881, vol. XXXI).
    ellauri135.html on line 565: Konsta ajaa Oka jokea alavirtaan peräprutkulla. Poijunvartija Shaslik varottaa ukonilmasta. Konsta pelastautuu poijusedän kaa Svjatoslav Richterin kesämökille. Svjatoslav on tiettävästi homo. Ahaa soittajaa ei ole vielä näkynyt, sanoo Shishkebab. Hän tuokin aina pelinsä mukanaan. Kazokaa tuota ovea. Se on niin leveä, et peli mahtuu sisälle.
    ellauri135.html on line 569: Sviatoslav Teofilovich Richter March 20 1915 – August 1, 1997) was a Soviet pianist who is frequently regarded as one of the greatest pianists of all time. He is known for the "depth of his interpretations, his virtuoso technique, and his vast repertoire." Charles Francis Richter (/ˈɹɪktəɹ/, 26. huhtikuuta 1900 – 30. syyskuuta 1985) oli yhdysvaltalainen seismologi, joka on kuuluisa maanjäristyksen voimakkuuden määrittelevän Richterin asteikon luomisesta.
    ellauri135.html on line 571: Richter was born in Zhytomyr, Volhynian Governorate of the Russian Empire (modern-day Ukraine), a native town of his parents. His father, Teofil Danilovich Richter [de] (1872–1941), was a pianist, organist and composer born to German expatriates; from 1893 to 1900 he studied in the University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna. His mother, Anna Pavlovna Richter (née Moskaleva; 1893–1963), came from a noble Russian landowning family, and at one point she moaned under her future husband.
    ellauri135.html on line 573: Richter moved in with his aunt Tamara. He lived with her from 1918 to 1921, and it was then that his interest in art first manifested itself: he first became interested in panting, which his aunt taught him.
    ellauri135.html on line 575: In 1943, Richter met Nina Dorliak (1908–1998), an operatic soprano. He noticed Dorliak during the memorial service for Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko, caught up with her at the street and suggested to accompany her in recital. It is often alleged that they married around this time, but in fact Dorliak only obtained a marriage certificate a few months after Richter's death in 1997. They remained living companions from around 1945 until Richter's death; they had no children. Dorliak accompanied Richter both in his complex private life and career. She supported him in his final illness, and died herself less than a year later, on May 17, 1998.
    ellauri135.html on line 577: It was rumored that Richter was homosexual and that having a female companion provided a social front for his true sexual orientation, because homosexuality was widely taboo at that time and could result in legal repercussions. Richter was an intensely private person and was usually quiet and withdrawn, and refused to give interviews. He never publicly discussed his personal life until the last year of his life when filmmaker Bruno Monsaingeon convinced him to be interviewed for a documentary.
    ellauri135.html on line 630: 1826, Kern otti eron vanhasta miehestä. 10v myöhemmin se meni naimisiin 16v serkkunsa kaa, Aleksandr Markov-Vinogradskyn. Hiänen viime vuodet meni niin köyhissä oloissa ezen piti myydä Pushkinin lähettämiä kirjeitä. Hiän kuoli yxin 27.5.1879 Moskovassa (minne sen poika muutti sen) kalustetussa huoneistossa Gruzinskajan ja Tverskajan kulmassa. Anna Petrovna haudattiin kirkkomaahan lähellä vanhaa kivikirkoa Prutnyan kylässä (Ven. д. Прутня), joka on 6 kilometerin päässä Torzhokista, lähellä Tveriä. Sade huutoi pois tien, eikä sen arkkua saatu siirrettyä hautuumaalle "miehen luoxe". Sen tarkka hautapaikka Prutnyassa on tietymättömissä, mutta hautuumaalla on symbolinen hautakivi. Urbaanilegenda kertoo että sen hautasaatto meni Pushkinin torin poikki just kun Pushkinin kuuluisaa razastajapazasta erektoitiin sinne. Tää oli niiden viime tapaaminen, niinkö.
    ellauri135.html on line 702: Yksinäisyyden teema. Sotilas sanoo, ettei kukaan ole kiinnostunut hänen kohtalostaan ​​paitsi ehkä isänsä ja äitinsä, ja he ovat todennäköisesti jo kuolleita. Hän pyytää myös välittämään uutiset kuolemaansa naapurille, jota hän rakasti ja joka oli jo unohtanut hänet. Kaikki tämä viittaa siihen, että sotilas ei arvosta elämäänsä, koska kukaan ei odota häntä. Hänen ei tarvitse pitää huolta itsestään, sillä ei ole eroa, tuleeko hän kotiin vai ei. Tästä kauhistuttavasta tunteesta tulee hänen kuolemansa tärkein syy, koska henkilö, joka tietää rakastavansa häntä, tekee kaiken mahdollisen palatakseen perheeseensä. Ja se, joka on yksinäinen, sallii nöyrästi tappaa itsensä.
    ellauri135.html on line 819: Runon luomisen ja analyysin historia
    ellauri135.html on line 820: Lermontovin "Pilvien" runon luomisen ja analysoinnin historia
    ellauri135.html on line 871:

    Syvällisin sydämen tunnelma on loistava. Venäjän runoilija Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov 💔 Barbara Lopukhin, hänen ystävänsä Alexen nuorempi sisko. Keväällä, ennen pääsiäistä 1832, maallisista naisista ja nuorista miehistä tuli All-Night Vigil Simonovin luostariin.
    ellauri140.html on line 34: "Se ei osaa raakkua oikealla äänellä. Se ei osaa varisten kieltä. Muut varixet eivät pidä siitä." "Sen siitä saa kun kesyyntyy. Ihmisen tahra", Fauni sanoi vailla inhoa tai halvexuntaa tai edes tuomiota, ihan iloisesti. Epäpuhtaus, julmuus, hyväxikäyttö, erhe, paska, runkku - muuta tapaa täällä oloon ei ole. Tai en ainakaan minä ole löytänyt. Sillä ei ole mitään tekemistä armon tai pelastuxen tai lunastuxeen menon kanssa. Se on kaikissa sisäänrakennettuna. Lajiominaisuutena. Fläkki joka on olemassa ennen jättämäänsä jälkeä. Fläkki edeltää tottelemattomuutta (?), hämmentää kaikki selityxet ja ymmärtämisen. Sixi kaikki puhaaminen on vaan vizi. Barbaarinen vizi. Se on kauhistuttavaa. Eikö pyrkimys puhtauteen ole epäpuhtautta? Faunia oli kuin kreikkalaiset, jonka jumalat on pikkumaisia (toisin kuin juutalaisten, LOL). Riitelevät, tappelevat, vihaavat, tappelevat naivat. Zeus yhtyy naiseen oudosti metrin mittaisella kyrvällä siipiään viuhtovana jouzenena. Irstautta, turmelusta, karkeista karkeimpia nautintoja, ja kaikkinäkevän vaimon raivo. Juutalaisten jumala on äärettömän yxinäinen, tuntematon, monomaaninen, jolla ei ole mitään tähdellisempää tekemistä kuin hermoilla jutkuista. Tai kristittyjen epäsexuaalinen kakkosjumala, yhtä tahraton kuin äitinsä, joka synnyttää tahatonta hilpeyttä ja myötähäpeää. Jumalat on tekijänsä kuvia." "Se kai siinä on traagista kun ihmiset synnyttävät varixia", sanoi tyttö joka syötti käärmeelle hiiriä. Feeding frogs to snakes. "Ne eivät tunnista omaa lajiaan. Sitä sanotaan tahriintumisexi", tyttö selitti. Peppu on oikeasti varis joka ei tiedä miten ollaan varis. Ei tähän kanteen tahraa jää kun äiti pois sen pyyhältää. Pieni nelkkari kovakantinen kirja jossa söpöjen elukoiden kuvia ja kullattu selkämys. Varisten kultainen kirja. Peppu oli siisteysintoilija, se ei sietänyt epäjärjestystä. Anaalis-retentiivinen luonne. Kaikki vanhat prujut talletettuna satoihin pahvilaatikoihin, shekinkannatkin. Niistä riitelevät haaskalla muut varixet vielä tänäänkin. (s. 126) Mä oon VAAAAALMIS. Tuu PYYYHKIMÄÄN.
    ellauri140.html on line 37: Armenialaistaustainen Murad Jacob "Jack" Kevorkian (May 26, 1928 – June 3, 2011) was an American pathologist and euthanasia proponent. He publicly championed a terminal patient's right to die by physician-assisted suicide, embodied in his quote, "Dying is not a crime". Kevorkian said that he assisted at least 130 patients to that end. He was convicted of murder in 1999 and was often portrayed in the media with the name of "Dr. Death". There was support for his cause, and he helped set the platform for reform.
    ellauri140.html on line 39: In 1998, Kevorkian was arrested and tried for his direct role in a case of voluntary euthanasia on a man named Thomas Youk who suffered from Lou Gehrig’s disease, or ALS. He was convicted of second-degree murder and served 8 years of a 10-to-25-year prison sentence. He was released on parole on June 1, 2007, on condition he would not offer advice about, participate in, or be present at the act of any type of suicide involving euthanasia to any other person, as well as neither promote nor talk about the procedure of assisted suicide.
    ellauri140.html on line 52: Book I is centered on the virtue of Holiness as embodied in the Redcrosse Knight. Largely self-contained, Book I can be understood to be its own miniature epic. The Redcrosse Knight and his lady Una travel together as he fights the monster Errour, then separately after the wizard Archipelago tricks the Redcrosse Knight into thinking that Una is unchaste using a false dream. After he leaves, the Redcrosse Knight meets Duessa, who feigns distress in order to entrap him. Duessa leads the Redcrosse Knight to captivity by the giant Orgigolo. Meanwhile, Una overcomes peril, meets Arthur, and finally finds the Redcrosse Knight and rescues him from his capture, from Duessa, and from Despair. Una and Arthur help the Redcrosse Knight recover in the House of Holiness, with the House's ruler Caelia and her three daughters joining them; there the Redcrosse Knight sees a vision of his future. He then returns Una to her parents' castle and rescues them from a dragon, and the two are betrothed after resisting Archipelago one last time.
    ellauri140.html on line 54: Book II is centred on the virtue of Temperance as embodied in Sir Guyon, who is tempted by the fleeing Archipelago into nearly attacking the Redcrosse Knight. Guyon discovers a woman killing herself out of grief for having her lover tempted and bewitched by the witch Acrasia and killed. Guyon swears a vow to avenge them and protect their child. Guyon on his quest starts and stops fighting several evil, rash, or tricked knights and meets Arthur. Finally, they come to Acrasia's Island and the Bower of Bliss, where Guyon resists temptations to violence, idleness, and lust. Guyon captures Acrasia in a net, destroys the Bower, and rescues those imprisoned there.
    ellauri140.html on line 56: Book III is centred on the virtue of Chastity as embodied in Britomart, a lady knight. Resting after the events of Book II, Guyon and Arthur meet Britomart, who wins a joust with Guyon. They separate as Arthur and Guyon leave to rescue Florimell, while Britomart rescues the Redcrosse Knight. Britomart reveals to the Redcrosse Knight that she is pursuing Sir Artegall because she is destined to marry him. The Redcrosse Knight defends Artegall and they meet Merlin, who explains more carefully Britomart's destiny to found the English monarchy. Britomart leaves and fights Sir Marinell. Arthur looks for Florimell, joined later by Sir Satyrane and Britomart, and they witness and resist sexual temptation. Britomart separates them with a stick and meets Sir Scudamore, looking for his captured lady Amoret. Britomart alone is able to rescue Amoret from the wizard Busirane. Unfortunately, when they emerge from the castle Scudamore is gone. (The 1590 version with Books I–III depicts the lovers' happy reunion, but this was changed in the 1596 version which contained all sex books.)
    ellauri140.html on line 58: Book IV, despite its title "The Legend of Cambell and Telamond or Of Friendship", Cambell's companion in Book IV is actually named Triamond, and the plot does not center on their friendship; the two men appear only briefly in the story. The book is largely a continuation of events begun in Book III. First, Scudamore is convinced by the hag Ate (discord) that Britomart has run off with Amoret and becomes jealous. A three-day tournament is then held by Satyrane, where Britomart beats Arthegal (both in disguise). Scudamore and Arthegal unite against Britomart, but when her helmet comes off in battle Arthegal falls in love with her. He surrenders, removes his helmet, and Britomart recognizes him as the man in the enchanted mirror. Arthegal pledges his love to her but must first leave and complete his quest. Scudamore, upon discovering Britomart's sex, realizes his mistake and asks after his lady, but by this time Britomart has lost Amoret, and she and Scudamore embark together on a search for her. The reader discovers that Amoret was abducted by a savage man and is imprisoned in his cave. One day Amoret darts out past the savage and is rescued from him by the squire Timias and Belphoebe. Arthur then appears, offering his service as a knight to the lost woman. She accepts, and after a couple of trials on the way, Arthur and Amoret finally happen across Scudamore and Britomart. The two lovers are reunited. Wrapping up a different plotline from Book III, the recently recovered Marinel discovers Florimell suffering in Proteus' dungeon. He returns home and becomes sick with love and pity. Eventually he confesses his feelings to his mother, and she pleads with Neptune to have the girl released, which the god grants.
    ellauri140.html on line 80: Artefact M+ (or Artegal or Arthegal or Arthegall), a knight who is the embodiment and champion of Justice. He meets Britomart after defeating her in a sword fight (she had been dressed as a knight) and removing her helmet, revealing her beauty. Artefact quickly falls in love with Britomart. Artefact has a companion in Talus, a metal man who wields a flail and never sleeps or tires but will mercilessly pursue and kill any number of villains. Talus obeys Artefact's command, and serves to represent justice without mercy (hence, Artefact is the more human face of justice). Later, Talus does not rescue Artefact from enslavement by the wicked slave-mistress Radigund, because Artefact is bound by a legal contract to serve her. Only her death, at Britomart's hands, liberates him. Chrysaor was the golden sword of Sir Artefact. This sword was also the favorite weapon of Demeter, the Greek goddess of the harvest. Because it was "Tempred with Adamant", it could cleave through anything.
    ellauri140.html on line 82: Arttu M+ perkele, nuorin Puukon veljexistä, of the Round Table, but playing a different role here. He is madly in love with the Faerie Queene and spends his time in pursuit of her when not helping the other knights out of their sundry predicaments. Prince Arthur is the Knight of Magnificence, the perfection of all virtues. Kyllä kai. Puukon veljexet sitoi dynamiittipötkyn koiran selkään. Koira juoxi taloon sisälle. Arttu perässä. Eipä tarvinnut enää suursiivota.
    ellauri140.html on line 86: Bellphone F+-, the beautiful sister of Amoret who spends her time in the woods hunting and avoiding the numerous amorous men who chase her. Timias, the squire of Arthur, eventually wins her love after she tends to the injuries he sustained in battle; however, Timias must endure much suffering to prove his love when Belphoebe sees him tending to a wounded woman and, misinterpreting his actions, flies off hastily. She is only drawn back to him after seeing how he has wasted away without her. Tää on niinkö Artemis eli Diana. Osuvasti kolmikulmapuistossa.
    ellauri140.html on line 88: Brit-o-mart F+, a female knight, the embodiment and champion of Chastity. She is young and beautiful, and falls in love with Artefact upon first seeing his face in her father's magic mirror. Though there is no interaction between them, she travels to find him again, dressed as a knight and accompanied by her nurse, Glauce. Britomart carries an enchanted spear that allows her to defeat every knight she encounters, until she loses to a knight who turns out to be her beloved Artefact. (Parallel figure in Ariosto: Bradamante.) Britomart is one of the most important knights in the story. She searches the world, including a pilgrimage to the shrine of Isis, and a visit with Merlin the magician. She rescues Artefact, and several other knights, from the evil slave-mistress Radigund. Furthermore, Britomart accepts Amoret at a tournament, refusing the false Florimell.
    ellauri140.html on line 90: Busyrane M-, the evil sorcerer who captures Amoret on her wedding night. When Britomart enters his castle to defeat him, she finds him holding Amoret captive. She is bound to a pillar and Busirane is torturing her. The clever Britomart handily defeats him and returns Amoret to her husband Artefact.
    ellauri140.html on line 97: Gambrina F+, Gambrina, la reine des bières! daughter of Agape and sister to Priamond, Diamond, and Triamond. Cambina is depicted holding a caduceus and a cup of nepenthe, signifying her role as a figure of concord. She marries Cambell after bringing an end to his fight with Triamond.
    ellauri140.html on line 103: Colin Firth M+, a shepherd noted for his songs and bagpipe playing, briefly appearing in Book VI. He is the same Colin Clout as in Spenser´s pastoral poetry, which is fitting because Calidore is taking a sojourn into a world of pastoral delight, ignoring his duty to hunt the Blatant Beast, which is why he set out to Ireland to begin with. Colin Clout may also be said to be Spenser himself.
    ellauri140.html on line 105: Cynochles M-, a knight in Book II who is defined by indecision and fluctuations of the will. He and his fiery brother Pygochles represent emotional maladies that threaten temperance. The two brothers are both slain by Prince Arthur in Canto VIII.
    ellauri140.html on line 109: Despair M-, a distraught man in a cave, his name coming from his mood. Using just rhetoric, he nearly persuades Redcrosse Knight to commit suicide, before Una steps in.
    ellauri140.html on line 115: Tsiou M+, the Knight of Temperature, the hero of Book II. He is the leader of the Knights of Maidenhead and carries the image of Gloriana on his shield. According to the Golden Legend, St. George´s name shares etymology with Guyon, which specifically means "the holy wrestler".
    ellauri140.html on line 117: Maritim M+-, "the knight of the sea"; son of a water nymph, he avoided all love because his mother had learnt that a maiden was destined to do him harm; this prophecy was fulfilled when he was stricken down in battle by Britomart, though he was not mortally wounded.
    ellauri140.html on line 126: Scubamour M+, the lover of Amoret. His name means "Diving gear of love". This character is based on Sir James Scudamore, a jousting champion and courtier to Queen Elizabeth I. Scudamour loses his love of Amoret to the benefit of the sorcerer Busirane. Though the 1590 edition of The Faerie Queene has Scudamour united with Amoret through Britomart´s assistance, the continuation in Book IV has them separated, never to be reunited.
    ellauri140.html on line 130: Triathlon M+, one of the Knights of Friendship, a hero of Book IV. Friend of Cambell. One of three brothers; when Priathlon and Diathlon died, their souls joined with his body. After battling Cambell, Triamond marries Cambell´s sister, Canapee. Tupu Hupu ja Lupu. Tripp Trapp Trull.
    ellauri140.html on line 136: Jotkut kirjalliset tekeleet uhraa historiallisen totuuden arrkkityyppisille myyteille, ja tekee runoudesta raamatullisia kvestejä, kuntaas Dispenser vahvistaa tarinansa ajankohtaisuutta arrrkkityyppisillä hahmoilla. Pitkin matkaa Homohaukassa Dosetti ei keskity ajattomaan kaavineeseen, vaan käyttää sellaista kaavinetta siirtääxeen menneisyyden merkityxen nykyaikaan. Menneitä jauhamalla Dosetti löytää keinoja paisuttaa Elisabetin hovin tärkeyttä. Se ei tee tapahtumista myyttiä, vaan pikemminkin meemeistä päivän uutista. Transukirjassa Dosetti kumittaa erotuxen arrkkityyppisen ja historiallisen välistä ihan tahalteen. Esimerkixi Dosetti ei varmaan usko joka tavua Brittikronikassa, mitä Arttu lukee Alma Mediasta. Tässä tapauxessa Aamulehti palvelee historian runollista vastinetta (niin aina). Siltikään tämmöinen runollinen historia ei ole myyttiä; pikemminkin, se 'koostuu uniikeista, vaikka osaxi fiktiivisistä tapahtumista kronologisessa järjestyxessä.' Sama erottelu toistuu kirjojen I ja V poliittisessa viestissä. Toki niiden ajankohtaisuus oli selvempää runon kirjoituxen aikana kuin nyt. (Äläs nyt! You don't say!) No täähän on just sama tematiikka kuin Danten komiikassa. Ja miljoonassa muussa kirjassa. Kynäilijät pompittaa fiktiivisiä avataarejaan ilmastaxeen omia ennakkoluulojaan. Tää menis tonne ja tapais ton ja size sanois että näin. En seiso kirjani takana vaan ajatusteni. Kuvitteleminen on ammattini, enhän mä enää muuta tee, enkä senpuoleen osaakaan.
    ellauri140.html on line 138: Throughout The Faerie Queene, Spenser creates "a network of allusions to events, issues, and particular persons in England and Ireland" including Mary, Queen of Scots, the Spanish Armada, the English Reformation, and even the Queen herself. It is also known that James VI of Scotland read the poem, and was very insulted by Duessa – a very negative depiction of his mother, Mary, Queen of Scots. She was a crocodile in the book. The Faerie Queene was then banned in Scotland. This led to a significant decrease in Elizabeth's support for the poem. Within the text, both the Faerie Queene and Belphoebe serve as two of the many personifications of Queen Elizabeth, some of which are "far from complimentary". Through their ancestor, Owen Tudor, the Tudors had Welsh blood, through which they claimed to be descendants of Arthur and rightful rulers of Britain.
    ellauri140.html on line 140: Though it praises her in some ways, The Faerie Queene questions Elizabeth's ability to rule so effectively because of her gender, and also inscribes the "shortcomings" of her rule. There is a character named Britomart who represents married chastity. This character is told that her destiny is to be an "immortal womb" – to have children. Here, Spenser is referring to Elizabeth's unmarried state and is touching on anxieties of the 1590s about what would happen after her death since the kingdom had no heir. No vittu ei ole maailma mixkään muuttunut, just samanlaista tuubaa kirjoitti Suomenmaa just Sanna Marinista.
    ellauri140.html on line 168: Idleness (M) (Sloth) – Described in the poem as "sluggish", Idleness rides a slow donkey, wears a monk's hood or priestly vest, and carries a book of prayer. However, the characteristics associating Idleness with a monk are not traditional of this vice. Jeesuxella oli aasi, ja Shrekillä. Niin ja Huan Hose Ramon Jimenezillä, nimeltä Harmo. Ihaa ei ollut laiska vaan masentunut.
    ellauri140.html on line 170: Gluttony (M) – Gluttony is described by Spenser as a "deformed creature" and "more like a monster, than a man". He enters the parade riding a dirty pig, bearing a large stomach and a thin neck. In the poem, Gluttony eats excessively as others starve; this is when gluttony is considered a sin. Muullon se oli A-OK Spenserin aikana. Kaikissa sioissa on pikkuisen likaa, ei siitä pitäs rankasta.
    ellauri140.html on line 172: Lechery (M) – The sin of lust. Mounted on a goat, Lechery does not appear to be attractive. He is described as an "unseemely man to please faire Ladies eye; / Yet he of Ladies oft was loved deare, / When fairer faces were bid standen by". This is when lechery is considered a sin. Eli lechery on syntiä naisilla ja homoilla.
    ellauri140.html on line 178: Wrath (M) – He carries a branding iron and a dagger as he rides a lion. His clothes are ripped and contain blood stains. He acts quickly in fits of rage, but often repents; "Ne car'd for blood in his avengement: / But when the furious fitt was overpast, / His cruel facts he often would repent. Vihan vika ei ole vihaaminen as such, vaan äkkipikasuus, harkinnan puute. Don't get mad, get even. Olkaa viattomia kuin pulut ja kavalia kuin käärmeet.
    ellauri140.html on line 193: Edmund Spenser was born in East Smithfield, London, around the year 1552; however, there is still some ambiguity as to the exact date of his birth. His parenthood is obscure, but he was probably the son of John Spenser, a journeyman clothmaker. As a young boy, he was educated in London at the Merchant Taylors' School and matriculated as a sizar at Pembroke College, Cambridge. While at Cambridge he became a friend of Gabriel Harvey and later consulted him, despite their differing views on poetry. In 1578, he became for a short time secretary to John Young, Bishop of Rochester. In 1579, he published The Shepheardes Calender and around the same time married his first wife, Machabyas Childe. They had two children, Sylvanus (d. 1638) and Katherine.
    ellauri140.html on line 197: In July 1580, Spenser went to Ireland in service of the newly appointed Lord Deputy, Arthur Grey, 14th Baron Grey de Wilton. Spenser served under Lord Grey with Walter Raleigh at the Siege of Smerwick massacre. When Lord Grey was recalled to England, Spenser stayed on in Ireland, having acquired other official posts and lands in the Munster Plantation. Raleigh acquired other nearby Munster estates confiscated in the Second Desmond Rebellion. Sometime between 1587 and 1589, Spenser acquired his main estate at Kilcolman, near Doneraile in North Cork. He later bought a second holding to the south, at Rennie, on a rock overlooking the river Blackwater in North Cork. Its ruins are still visible today. A short distance away grew a tree, locally known as "Spenser's Oak" until it was destroyed in a lightning strike in the 1960s. Local legend claims that he penned some of The Faerie Queene under this tree.
    ellauri140.html on line 199: In 1590, Spenser brought out the first three books of his most famous work, The Faerie Queene, having travelled to London to publish and promote the work, with the likely assistance of Raleigh. He was successful enough to obtain a life pension of £50 a year from the Queen. He probably hoped to secure a place at court through his poetry, but his next significant publication boldly antagonised the queen's principal secretary, Lord Burghley (William Cecil), through its inclusion of the satirical Mother Hubberd's Tale. He returned to Ireland. Oops.
    ellauri140.html on line 203: By 1594, Spenser's first wife had died, and in that year he married a much younger Elizabeth Boyle, a relative of Richard Boyle, 1st Earl of Cork. He addressed to her the sonnet sequence Amoretti. The marriage itself was celebrated in Epithalamion. They had a son named Peregrine. Ei ollut varmaan yhtä hyvä laulamaan kuin Susan Boyle, mutta ehkä nätimpi. Did you prick his Boyle? MY GOODNESS!
    ellauri140.html on line 205: In 1596, Spenser wrote a prose pamphlet titled A View of the Present State of Ireland. This piece, in the form of a dialogue, circulated in manuscript, remaining unpublished until the mid-seventeenth century. It is probable that it was kept out of print during the author's lifetime because of its inflammatory content. The pamphlet argued that Ireland would never be totally "pacified" by the English until its indigenous language and customs had been destroyed, if necessary by violence. Vitun kolonialisti paskiainen.
    ellauri140.html on line 207: In 1598, during the Nine Years' War, Spenser was driven from his home by the native Irish forces of Aodh Ó Néill. His castle at Kilcolman was burned, and Ben Jonson, who may have had private information, asserted that one of his infant children died in the blaze.
    ellauri140.html on line 209: In the year after being driven from "his home", 1599, Spenser travelled to London, where he died at the age of forty-six – "for want of bread", according to Ben Jonson; one of Jonson's more doubtful statements, since Spenser had a payment to him authorised by the government and was due his pension (What the fuck, ei kaxitonnisella vuodessa vielä kuuhun mennä.)
    ellauri140.html on line 211: His coffin was carried to his grave in Poets' Corner in Westminster Abbey by other poets, who threw many pens and pieces of poetry into his grave with many tears (all free of charge). His second wife survived him and remarried twice. His sister Sarah, who had accompanied him to Ireland, married into the Travers family, and her descendants were prominent landowners in Cork for centuries. Korkad kille, kaiken kaikkiaan.
    ellauri140.html on line 258: Heute ich und morgen du Her Green Beret has met his fate Hänen vihreä vaellushattunsa on kohdannut kohtalonsa.
    ellauri140.html on line 260: Im Morgenrot warum muß das sein Leaving her this last request Jättäen hiänelle tämän viimeisen pyynnön:
    ellauri140.html on line 312: His angry steede did chide his foming bitt, Sen keppihevonen oli sille hirmu vihainen,
    ellauri140.html on line 318: And on his brest a bloudie Crosse he bore, Ja rinnassa oli sillä Finlands röda kors,
    ellauri140.html on line 319: The deare remembrance of his dying Lord, Sen kuolleen herran matkamuistoja,
    ellauri140.html on line 322: Upon his shield the like was also scor'd, Sen housukilvessä oli sama graffiti:
    ellauri140.html on line 323: For soveraine hope, which in his helpe he had; Ristiä sano kissa kun jäälle kuoli.
    ellauri140.html on line 325: But of his cheere did seeme too solemne sad; Mut hilpeenäkin oli siinä jotain ankeaa,
    ellauri140.html on line 334: And ever as he rode, his hart did earne Ja kun se razasteli sen sydän isosi
    ellauri140.html on line 335: To prove his puissance in battell brave Saada mainetta kuin Georges Bataille,
    ellauri140.html on line 336: Upon his foe, and his new force to learne; Voittoa vihulaisen elävästä voimasta,
    ellauri140.html on line 337: Upon his foe, a Dragon° horrible and stearne. Joka oli se louhikäärme kamala.
    ellauri140.html on line 359: Whom to avenge, she had this Knight from far compeld. Niille kostamaan se palkkas kaverin.
    ellauri140.html on line 365: Of needments at his backe. Thus as they past, Pitkässä hihnassa lyhkäsessä selässä.
    ellauri140.html on line 368: Did poure into his Lemans lap so fast, Apureiden selkään niin maan pirusti,
    ellauri140.html on line 370: And this faire couple eke to shroud themselves were fain. Niin näidenkin 2, plus karizan ja kääpiön.
    ellauri140.html on line 424: Eftsoones dismounted from his courser brave, Nousee keljun hepan satulasta,
    ellauri140.html on line 425: And to the Dwarfe awhile his needlesse spere he gave. Ja antaa joutilaalle knääpiölle keihäänsä.
    ellauri140.html on line 429: Least suddaine mischiefe ye too rash provoke: Ettei joku pahis sua yllätä,
    ellauri140.html on line 439: Yea but (quoth she) the perill of this place Niinniimmut (intti hiän), tän paikan riskit
    ellauri140.html on line 444: This is the wandring wood,° this Errours den, Jota vihaa sekä Jahve että me.
    ellauri140.html on line 447: The fearefull Dwarfe) this is no place for living men. Tää ei ole mikään paikka meille miehille.
    ellauri140.html on line 453: And looked in: his glistring armor made Ja kurkki sisään: sen puvun vetoketju
    ellauri140.html on line 485: And with his trenchand blade her boldly kept Ja leikkaavalla terällään se rohkeasti
    ellauri140.html on line 490: Who nought aghast his mightie hand enhaunst: Joka säikähtämättä työnsi esiin tumppua:
    ellauri140.html on line 499: Lept fierce upon his shield, and her huge traine Loikkas hurjasti sen housukilvelle,
    ellauri140.html on line 500: All suddenly about his body wound, Kietoi koko äijän kierukkansa sisälle,
    ellauri140.html on line 505: His Lady sad to see his sore constraint, Sen leidi näki missä kusessa se oli,
    ellauri140.html on line 511: And knitting all his force got one hand free, Pinnisti aivan vitusti ja sai käden vapaaxi
    ellauri140.html on line 531: But when his later spring gins to avale, Mut kun se loppukeväästä alkaa laskea,
    ellauri140.html on line 534: And partly female of his fruitful seed; ja osaxi naisia, sen siemenistä nousseita,
    ellauri140.html on line 545: With swarming all about his legs did crall, Jotka ryömi pitkin nuppiparan vartta vaapperaa,
    ellauri140.html on line 551: High on an hill, his flocke to vewen wide, Korkealla mäen päällä tarkastelee laumaansa,
    ellauri140.html on line 556: But with his clownish hands their tender wings Vaan huitoo päänsä ympäri kuin miehet etelästä
    ellauri140.html on line 562: Halfe furious unto his foe he came, Se puoliveteisenä käy taas vihollisen liiveihin
    ellauri140.html on line 593: Approcht in hast to greet his victorie, Kuis jätkän käy, ja tulee kiireellä
    ellauri140.html on line 597: Wherin ye have great glory wonne this day, Kylsä oozun housukilven arvoinen.
    ellauri140.html on line 604: Then mounted he upon his Steede againe, Size nuppi nousi jälleen satulaan
    ellauri140.html on line 610: So forward on his way (with God to frend)° Niet suoraan vaan Jahven messissä
    ellauri140.html on line 621: His feete all bare, his beard all hoarie gray Paljasjalkaisen ja harmaapartaisen
    ellauri140.html on line 622: And by his belt his booke he hanging had; Jolla oli äänikirja vyölaukussa,
    ellauri140.html on line 624: And to the ground his eyes were lowly bent, Sen silmät kieroilivat maahan päin.
    ellauri140.html on line 627: And often knockt his brest, as one that did repent. Mätki katuvasti rintalasta nyrkillä.
    ellauri140.html on line 637: Bidding his beades all day for his trespas, joka ei muuta tee kun laskee pellettejä
    ellauri140.html on line 646: That wasteth all this countrey farre and neare. Ja panee liisteixi haja-asutusta.
    ellauri140.html on line 649: In which that wicked wight his dayes doth weare: Mistoi lurjus tuppaa majailee,
    ellauri140.html on line 663: At night doth baite his steedes the Ocean waves emong. Tarvii yöllä ottaa vähän taukoa.
    ellauri140.html on line 674: For this same night. The knight was well content: Tää oli nupista ideana mainio.
    ellauri140.html on line 675: So with that godly father to his home they went. Niin ne meni äijän luo yöxi sohvalle.
    ellauri140.html on line 697: And well could file his tongue as smooth as glas, Se osas sanoja myös viilata,
    ellauri140.html on line 707: Unto their lodgings then his guestes he riddes: Äijä kampeaa vieraat olohuoneen sohvalle.
    ellauri140.html on line 709: He to this study goes, and there amiddes Toimistossa kaivaa velhon keittokirjoja,
    ellauri140.html on line 735: Fluttring about his ever damned hed, Jotka lentää lepatteli
    ellauri140.html on line 737: To aide his friends, or fray his enimies: Odotellen käskytystä,
    ellauri140.html on line 748: His dwelling is; there Tethys° his wet bed Se bunkkaa; siellä yökastelija Tethys
    ellauri140.html on line 750: In silver deaw his ever-drouping hed, Roikuttaa siellä hopeaista päätänsä.
    ellauri140.html on line 766: And unto Morpheus comes, whom drowned deepe Ja tulee Morfeuxen luoxe, joka tuhisee
    ellauri140.html on line 771: And more, to lulle him in his slumber soft,° Eikä siinä kaikki! sitä nukuttamaan
    ellauri140.html on line 784: But his wast wordes returnd to him in vaine: Mutta ne kaikui kuin Mikonkadun Fazerilla:
    ellauri140.html on line 791: He mumbled soft, but would not all° his silence breake. Se mökelsi jotakin, muttei siitä saanut selvää.
    ellauri140.html on line 798: And lifting up his lumpish head, with blame Nosti paxumpaa päätänsä, ja äkäisenä
    ellauri140.html on line 802: He bids thee to him send for his intent Hää pyytää sua lähettämään sen tarpeisiin
    ellauri140.html on line 808: A diverse dreame out of his prison darke, Divergentin unen pimeimmästä vankikopista,
    ellauri140.html on line 814: And on his litle winges the dreame he bore Ja pikku siivillään kantoi unen kotio,
    ellauri140.html on line 815: In hast unto his Lord, where he him left afore. Herralleen sinne mistä oli tullutkin.
    ellauri140.html on line 819: Who all this while with charmes and hidden artes, Sillä aikaa Michelangelo oli tehnyt taialla
    ellauri140.html on line 824: The maker selfe, for all his wondrous witt, Ize tekijällä, vaikka oli huisin terävä,
    ellauri140.html on line 834: And with false shewes abuse his fantasy, Ja käyttämään sen mielikuvitusta väärin unessa,
    ellauri140.html on line 845: The one upon his hardy head him plast Toinen meni istumaan sen hellälle nupille,
    ellauri140.html on line 847: That nigh his manly hart did melt away, Niin että melkein siltä kastui kalsarit.
    ellauri140.html on line 849: Then seemed him his Lady by him lay, Missä sen leidi oli olevinaan messissä,
    ellauri140.html on line 856: Fayre Venus° seemde unto his bed to bring Näytti Venus-kondomiaskin upealta naiselta,
    ellauri140.html on line 867: In this great passion of unwonted lust, Tässä tavattomassa himon kiimassa,
    ellauri140.html on line 870: Some secret ill, or hidden foe of his: Jotain salaista pahaa, tai vihanpitäjää,
    ellauri140.html on line 871: Lo there before his face his Lady is, Mut kas siinähän sen edessä se leidi on,
    ellauri140.html on line 881: He thought have slaine her in his fierce despight: Se aikoi eka tappaa sen ihan vitutuxesta,
    ellauri140.html on line 883: He stayde his hand, and gan himselfe advise Se pidätti kättään ja tarttui keskijalkaansa,
    ellauri140.html on line 884: To prove his sense,° and tempt her faigned truth. Nyt täytyy pidättää, se sanoi, ensin koitella.
    ellauri140.html on line 941: Much griev'd to thinke that gentle Dame so light, Ahistuneena tosta lörppävittuisesta daamista,
    ellauri140.html on line 942: For whose defence he was to shed his blood. Jonka puolustamisexi se oli vuodattanut vertansa.
    ellauri140.html on line 944: Having yrockt asleepe his irkesome spright, se nukahti; sillä aikaa keijukainen ilkeä
    ellauri140.html on line 945: That troublous dreame gan freshly tosse his braine, Alkoi rainata sitä vaivaannuttavaa unennäköä
    ellauri140.html on line 947: But when he saw his labour all was vaine, Mutku se näki ezen vaivannäkö ei tuota tulosta,
    ellauri140.html on line 956: BY this the Northerne wagoner° had set Tähän mennessä pohjoisen vaunumies
    ellauri140.html on line 961: And chearefull Chaunticlere° with his note shrill Ja iloinen kukko korkealla äänellä
    ellauri140.html on line 964: Full envious that night so long his roome did fill. Kiukkuisena yölle joka istuxi sen paikalla.
    ellauri140.html on line 971: Their bootelesse paines, and ill succeeding night: Turhista vaivoistaan, ja munatusta yöstä,
    ellauri140.html on line 972: Who all in rage to see his skilfull might Se raivostui niin pirusti, ezen taitoja
    ellauri140.html on line 975: But when he saw his threatning was but vaine, Apureita, mut nähtyään sen turhaxi,
    ellauri140.html on line 976: He cast about, and searcht his baleful bookes againe. Se lähti takas piirustuspöydän ääreen.
    ellauri140.html on line 984: His wanton dayes that ever loosely led, olis petipuuhissa ja naisten nauratuxessa,
    ellauri140.html on line 985: Without regard of armes and dreaded fight: Viis veisaisi aseista ja nahisteluista.
    ellauri140.html on line 993: Unto his guest, who after troublous sights Nupin luo, joka hankalien uninäkyjen
    ellauri140.html on line 1011: And would have slaine them in his furious ire, Ja olisi tappanut ne pää punaisena,
    ellauri140.html on line 1016: Returning to his bed in torment great, Se palas vuoteeseen äimän käkenä,
    ellauri140.html on line 1017: And bitter anguish of his guiltie sight, Ja kärsi tuskia näkemästään touhusta,
    ellauri140.html on line 1018: He could not rest, but did his stout heart eat, Ei voinut nukkua, vaan järsi nyrkkiä,
    ellauri140.html on line 1019: And wast his inward gall with deepe despight, Söi sappea ja kiristeli hampaita,
    ellauri140.html on line 1022: Had spent his lampe and brought forth dawning light, sammuxiin ja sytytteli aamunkoittoa,
    ellauri140.html on line 1024: The Dwarfe him brought his steed: so both away do fly. Knääpiö toi hepan ja ne lähti tiehensä.
    ellauri140.html on line 1042: For him so far had borne his light-foot steede, Mut turhaan, Nupin heppa oli tuulennopea,
    ellauri140.html on line 1052: But subtill Archimago, when his guests Sofistikoitu suurmufti, kun vieraansa
    ellauri140.html on line 1055: Th' end of his drift, he praisd his divelish arts, Sen juonen ansiosta, se taputti izeään
    ellauri140.html on line 1059: For her he hated as the hissing snake, Sillä sitä se vihasi kuin vällykäärme ize,
    ellauri141.html on line 59: The great charm of Maecenas in his relation to the men of genius who formed his circle was his simplicity, cordiality and sincerity. Although not particular in the choice of some of the associates of his pleasures, he admitted none but men of worth to his intimacy, and when once admitted they were treated like equals.
    ellauri141.html on line 97: Maecenas : A toast. Let us all drink to it: that we will let nothing never destroy this business!
    ellauri141.html on line 109: Quintus Horatius Flaccus (8th of December, Ab Urbe Condita 689, B. C. 65 - 27th of November, B. C. 8) was born at or near Venusia (Venosa), in the Apennines, on the borders of Lucania and Apulia. His father was a freedman, having, as his name proves, been the slave of some person of the Horatia gens. As Horace implies that he himself was ingenuus, his father must have obtained his freedom before his birth. He afterwards followed the calling of a coactor, a collector of money in some way or other, it is not known in what. He made, in this capacity, enough to purchase an estate, probably a small one, near the above town, where the poet was born. We hear nothing of his mother, except that Horace speaks of both his parents with affection. His father, probably seeing signs of talent in him as a child, was not content to have him educated at a provincial school, but took him (at what age he does not say, but probably about twelve) to Rome, where he became a pupil of Orbilius Pupillus, who had a school of much note, attended by boys of good family, and whom Horace remembered all his life as an irritable teacher, given unnecessarily to the use of the rod. With him he learnt grammar, the earlier Latin authors, and Homer. He attended other masters (of rhetoric, poetry, and music perhaps), as Roman boys were wont, and had the advantage (to which he afterwards looked back with gratitude) of his father’s care and moral training during this part of his education. It was usual for young men of birth and ability to be sent to Athens, to finish their education by the study of Greek literature and philosophy under native teachers; and Horace went there too, at what age is not known, but probably when he was about twenty. Whether his father was alive at that time, or dead, is uncertain. If he went to Athens at twenty, it was in B. C. 45, the year before Julius Cæsar was assassinated. After that event, Brutus and Cassius left Rome and went to Greece. Foreseeing the struggle that was before them, they got round them many of the young men at that time studying at Athens, and Horace was appointed tribune in the army of Brutus, a high command, for which he was not qualified. He went with Brutus into Asia Minor, and finally shared his defeat at Philippi, B. C. 42. He makes humorous allusion to this defeat in his Ode to Pompeius Varus (ii. 7). After the battle he came to Italy, having obtained permission to do so, like many others who were willing to give up a desperate cause and settle quietly at home. His patrimony, however, was forfeited, and he seems to have had no means of subsistence, which induced him to employ himself in writing verses, with the view, perhaps, of bringing himself into notice, rather than for the purpose of making money by their sale. By some means he managed to get a place as scriba in the Quæstor’s office, whether by purchase or interest does not appear. In either case, we must suppose he contrived soon to make friends, though he could not do so by the course he pursued, without also making many enemies. His Satires are full of allusions to the enmity his verses had raised up for him on all hands. He became acquainted, among other literary persons, with Virgil and Varius, who, about three years after his return (B. C. 39), introduced him to Mæcenas, who was careful of receiving into his circle a tribune of Brutus, and one whose writings were of a kind that was new and unpopular. He accordingly saw nothing of Horace for nine months after his introduction to him. He then sent for him (B. C. 38), and from that time continued to be his patron and warmest friend.
    ellauri141.html on line 111: At his house, probably, Horace became intimate with Polio, and the many persons of consideration whose friendship he appears to have enjoyed. Through Mæcenas, also, it is probable Horace was introduced to Augustus; but when that happened is uncertain. In B. C. 37, Mæcenas was deputed by Augustus to meet M. Antonius at Brundisium, and he took Horace with him on that journey, of which a detailed account is given in the fifth Satire of the first book. Horace appears to have parted from the rest of the company at Brundisium, and perhaps returned to Rome by Tarentum and Venusia. (See S. i. 5, Introduction.) Between this journey and B. C. 32, Horace received from his friend the present of a small estate in the valley of the Digentia (Licenza), situated about thirty-four miles from Rome, and fourteen from Tibur, in the Sabine country. Of this property he gives a description in his Epistle to Quintius (i. 16), and he appears to have lived there a part of every year, and to have been fond of the place, which was very quiet and retired, being four miles from the nearest town, Varia (Vico Varo), a municipium perhaps, but not a place of any importance. During this interval he continued to write Satires and Epodes, but also, it appears probable, some of the Odes, which some years later he published, and others which he did not publish. These compositions, no doubt, were seen by his friends, and were pretty well known before any of them were collected for publication. The first book of the Satires was published probably in B. C. 35, the Epodes in B. C. 30, and the second book of Satires in the following year, when Horace was about thirty-five years old. When Augustus returned from Asia, in B. C. 29, and closed the gates of Janus, being the acknowledged head of the republic, Horace appeared among his most hearty adherents. He wrote on this occasion one of his best Odes (i. 2), and employed his pen in forwarding those reforms which it was the first object of Augustus to effect. (See Introduction to C. ii. 15.) His most striking Odes appear, for the most part, to have been written after the establishment of peace. Some may have been written before, and probably were. But for some reason it would seem that he gave himself more to lyric poetry after his thirty-fifth year than he had done before. He had most likely studied the Greek poets while he was at Athens, and some of his imitations may have been written early. If so, they were most probably improved and polished, from time to time, (for he must have had them by him, known perhaps only to a few friends, for many years,) till they became the graceful specimens of artificial composition that they are. Horace continued to employ himself in this kind of writing (on a variety of subjects, convivial, amatory, political, moral,—some original, many no doubt suggested by Greek poems) till B. C. 24, when there are reasons for thinking the first three books of the Odes were published. During this period, Horace appears to have passed his time at Rome, among the most distinguished men of the day, or at his house in the country, paying occasional visits to Tibur, Præneste, and Baiæ, with indifferent health, which required change of air. About the year B. C. 26 he was nearly killed by the falling of a tree, on his own estate, which accident he has recorded in one of his Odes (ii. 13), and occasionally refers to; once in the same stanza with a storm in which he was nearly lost off Cape Palinurus, on the western coast of Italy. When this happened, nobody knows. After the publication of the three books of Odes, Horace seems to have ceased from that style of writing, or nearly so; and the only other compositions we know of his having produced in the next few years are metrical Epistles to different friends, of which he published a volume probably in B. C. 20 or 19. He seems to have taken up the study of the Greek philosophical writers, and to have become a good deal interested in them, and also to have been a little tired of the world, and disgusted with the jealousies his reputation created. His health did not improve as he grew older, and he put himself under the care of Antonius Musa, the emperor’s new physician. By his advice he gave up, for a time at least, his favorite Baiæ. But he found it necessary to be a good deal away from Rome, especially in the autumn and winter.
    ellauri141.html on line 113: In B. C. 17, Augustus celebrated the Ludi Seculares, and Horace was required to write an Ode for the occasion, which he did, and it has been preserved. This circumstance, and the credit it brought him, may have given his mind another leaning to Ode-writing, and have helped him to produce the fourth book, a few pieces in which may have been written at any time. It is said that Augustus particularly desired Horace to publish another book of Odes, in order that those he wrote upon the victories of Drusus and Tiberius (4 and 14) might appear in it. The latter of these Odes was not written, probably, till B. C. 13, when Augustus returned from Gaul. If so, the book was probably published in that year, when Horace was fifty-two. The Odes of the fourth book show no diminution of power, but the reverse. There are none in the first three books that surpass, or perhaps equal, the Ode in honor of Drusus, and few superior to that which is addressed to Lollius. The success of the first three books, and the honor of being chosen to compose the Ode at the Ludi Seculares, seem to have given him encouragement. There are no incidents in his life during the above period recorded or alluded to in his poems. He lived five years after the publication of the fourth book of Odes, if the above date be correct, and during that time, I think it probable, he wrote the Epistles to Augustus and Florus which form the second book; and having conceived the intention of writing a poem on the art and progress of poetry, he wrote as much of it as appears in the Epistle to the Pisones which has been preserved among his works. It seems, from the Epistle to Florus, that Horace at this time had to resist the urgency of friends begging him to write, one in this style and another in that, and that he had no desire to gratify them and to sacrifice his own ease to a pursuit in which it is plain he never took any great delight. He was likely to bring to it less energy as his life was drawing prematurely to a close, through infirmities either contracted or aggravated during his irrational campaigning with Brutus, his inaptitude for which he appears afterwards to have been perfectly aware of. He continued to apply himself to the study of moral philosophy till his death, which took place, according to Eusebius, on the 27th of November, B. C. 8, in the fifty-seventh year of his age, and within a few days of its completion. Mæcenas died the same year, also towards the close of it; a coincidence that has led some to the notion, that Horace hastened his own death that he might not have the pain of surviving his patron. According to Suetonius, his death (which he places after his fifty-ninth year) was so sudden, that he had not time to execute his will, which is opposed to the notion of suicide. The two friends were buried near one another “in extremis Esquiliis,” in the farthest part of the Esquiliæ, that is, probably, without the city walls, on the ground drained and laid out in gardens by Mæcenas.
    ellauri141.html on line 209: The obscene qualities of some of the Epodes have repulsed even scholars. Suetonius recorded some gossip about Horace's sexual activities late in life, involving mirrors. William Thackeray produced a version of Odes 1.38 in which Horace's questionable 'boy' became 'Lucy', and Gerard Manley Hopkins translated the boy "innocently" as 'child'. Horace was translated by Sir Theodore Martin (biographer of Prince Albert) but minus some ungentlemanly verses, such as the erotic Odes 1.25 and Epodes 8 and 12. Translators historically excluded the problem poems 8 and 12, but also the far less obscene but explicitly gay 11. Philip Francis (1746) and Bulwer Lytton (1870) omit the problem poems from their translations. Niin teki myös Eero Kivikari. Suuhun myös peräpäähän teitä pukkaan. Irrumabo ego vos et pedicabo. Quos ego!
    ellauri141.html on line 305: In Epode 11, the iambist regretfully recalls to his friend Pettius his infatuation with a girl named Inachia. The latter name does not occur elsewhere in extant Latin or Greek except in the very next poem in the Gedichtbuch, where the iambist’s older (ex-)lover complains of his sexual endurance with Inachia in contrast to his impotence with her (12.14-6). The name may suggest an ethnically Greek or Argive woman, or the Greek noms de lit regularly adopted by Italian meretrices. Yet, as some (but by no means all) commentators have noted, the name also evokes Io, the daughter of Inachus, jota Zeus bylsi härän hahmossa. Eli kyllä tässäkin yhden kynäilijän mielestä on jotain impotenssin käryä.
    ellauri141.html on line 334: diligeret mulier sua quam te. the bachelor most doted upon by his darling.
    ellauri141.html on line 339: "Of small stature, fond of the sun, prematurely grey, quick-tempered but easily placated". Häntä vaivasi jonkinlainen silmätauti. Luonteeltaan hän näyttää olleen vilkas, iloinen ja leikkisä vanhapoika. Äkkipikainen, suuttui helposti mutta leppyi yhtä helposti. Bilbo Hobbitin doppelgängeri. The poet died at 56 years of age, not long after his friend Maecenas [or before? Opinions vary] near whose tomb he was laid to rest.
    ellauri141.html on line 349: For me, supine beneath this vine,
    ellauri141.html on line 352: So where am I going with all this? My purpose in quoting the various versions, isn’t to compare and reconcile them, but to give some sense of just how ubiquitous the translations are and to raise the question: Why has this poem endured?
    ellauri141.html on line 354: And by way of further warning, I’d better say up front that my reading of this poem differs radically from every other that I’ve seen. What follows is, I think, pretty well uncharted territory in the Persicos Odi canon. I’m going to try to make the case for and translate Pericos odi as a sex poem!
    ellauri141.html on line 366: Adolescent slave boys were fair game for a virile man. Jupiter may have had his Ganymede, but none of the standard pantheon of gods were gay as we use the term. But there was a limit: it was queer to screw a boy after he was old enough to shave. “Passive’ homosexuality was the real disgrace. The urge to bugger was understandable. A man’s desire to be buggered was disgraceful. As often observed, it was better to give than receive. And in Horace’s poems, pederasty seems no more frowned upon than a taste for veal might be frowned upon today. Actually less. By now you can see where I’m headed with all this. I think the puer in Persicos odi, puer, apparatus... is the kind of boy that Horace is sometimes fond of screwing.
    ellauri141.html on line 478: Carrie Balestier oli 29-vuotias ja Rudyard Kipling 26-vuotias kun he avioituivat 18. tammikuuta 1892 Lontoossa. Häät pidettiin Lontoon All Souls Churchissa, ja Henry James luovutti morsiamen vain vähän käytettynä.
    ellauri141.html on line 488: "Valkoisen miehen taakka” (The White Man's Burden) (1899) herätti polemiikkia julkaisunsa jälkeen. Kyseiset runot ovat monitulkintaisia. Joidenkin mukaan ne olivat valistuneen ja velvollisuudentuntoisen imperiumin rakentamisen ylistys, joka henki viktoriaanisen ajan henkeä. Toiset näkivät niissä röyhkeää imperialistista propagandaa ja siihen liittyviä rodullisia asenteita. Toiset taas näkivät runoissa ironiaa ja varoituksia imperiumia kohtaavista uhista. Antero Manninen käänsi "Valkoisen miehen taakan" suomeksi 1976.
    ellauri141.html on line 492: Vuonna 1902 Kipling osti vuonna 1634 rakennetun kartanon nimeltä Bateman’s, joka sijaitsee maaseudulla Burwashissa, East Sussexissa. Tilan koko oli 130 000 m² mukaan lukien ympäröivät rakennukset ja mylly , ja Kipling maksoi siitä 9 300 puntaa, joka nykymyyntihintana vastaisi 735 000 puntaa. Talossa ei ollut kylpyhuonetta, juoksevaa vettä yläkerrassa eikä sähköjä, mutta silti Kipling piti siitä paljon, kuten hän marraskuussa 1902 lähettämässä kirjeessään sanoi: ”Katsokaa meitä, harmaakivisen talon laillisia omistajia – A.D. 1634 lukee oviparrussa, paneloitu, vanha tammiportaikko ja kaikki koskematonta ja aitoa. Se on hyvä ja rauhallinen paikka. Me olemme rakastaneet sitä ensi silmäyksestä lähtien”.
    ellauri141.html on line 502: George Beresford ('Turkey'), who shared a study with Kipling and Dunsterville ('Stalky'), reports Kipling as bad at Latin and with no Greek. Little of his education stuck. His reputation at school was of someone who was imprecise about scansion, long or short syllables and syntax, and who made wild and funny guesses at the sense.
    ellauri141.html on line 505: In the classics, that is Latin, he was no more than an ordinary boy, but he gave the impression that if he thought it essential for his literary ambitions, he would tackle it to good purpose. But somehow he did not so think, and he made no effort to acquire a vocabulary or memorise Latin words—consequently, his construes were sometimes a succession of errs and hums waiting and hoping for the form-master kindly to supply the missing translation. (5)
    ellauri141.html on line 507: Kipling himself confessed that ‘every Latin quantity was an arbitrary mystery’ to him, that his teacher Crofts ‘loathed me as to Latin’ and that he had construed the beginning of the Cleopatra Ode (1.37) very badly on one occasion. It was M'Turk/Beresford who composed the Latin elegiacs translating Gray’s Elegy which Stalky and Beetle needed to prepare.
    ellauri141.html on line 513: Kipling encountered him as a schoolboy, and wrote in Something of Myself (p.33) that C----, his classics master ('King' in Stalky & Co.) ...taught me to loath Horace for two years, to forget him for twenty, and then to love him for the rest of my days and through many sleepless nights.
    ellauri141.html on line 514: He wrote "Donec Gratus Eram" as a schoolboy, and a series of other 'echoes' of Horace in later life. He carried a copy of Horace’s four books of Odes around with him, in which he wrote original epigrams of his own.
    ellauri141.html on line 516: From 1917 he began to experiment with his own versions of Horace. See Thomas Pinney (Ed.) Letters IV pp. 439-40. In 1920, he and a group of friends published Q. Horatii Flacci Carminum Liber Quintus (Horace, Book V) a collection of parodies in English and Latin, which included "A Translation". "Lollius" was specially written for the book, which also included "The Pro-Consuls". See also three later poems linked to stories in Debits and Credits (1926); “The Portent”, “The Survival” and “The Last Ode.”.
    ellauri141.html on line 519: ... Here is my defence of this alleged wicked waste of time. The reason why one has to parse and construe and grind at the dead tongues in which certain ideas are expressed is … because only in that tongue is that idea expressed with absolute perfection…. by a painful and laborious acquaintance with the mechanism of that particular tongue; by being made to take it to pieces and put it together again, and by that means only, we can arrive at a state of mind in which … we can realise and feel and absorb the idea.
    ellauri141.html on line 524: This had been a worry in the second century BC, when a bill had been brought in to extend citizenship to Latins and Kipling would have picked up what Juvenal had said about ‘the hungry Greekling’ (Graeculus esuriens) and the Syrian Orontes flowing into the Tiber.
    ellauri141.html on line 525: "It is a hard law but an old one – Rome died learning it, as our western civilisation may die – that if you give any man anything that he has not painfully earned for himself, you infallibly make him or his descendants your devoted enemies."
    ellauri141.html on line 566: The genesis of Horace Odes, Book V was in the brains of Kipling. It occurred to him about the blackest time of the last war, end of 1917 and early months of 1918, as a means of keeping up one's spirits and distracting our thoughts from present troubles, and he wrote to me outlining his plan and making many admirable suggestions for subjects of the sham odes. (262)
    ellauri141.html on line 567: Graves wrote for The Spectator and for Punch and his comic histories must have been to Kipling’s taste. He collaborated with E. V. Lucas, also a Punch journalist, with whom Kipling had corresponded at least since 1906. (263)‘He was the most exhilarating of companions, radiating vitality, goodwill and interest in the other man and his concerns’.
    ellauri141.html on line 569: The ‘editor’ of the Latin text was the clever versifier A. D. Godley of Oxford. (267) He contributed graceful acknowledgements (268) and a hilarious preface about the (fictitious) manuscripts, which parodies the standard praefatio of an Oxford Classical Text (brown-covered in those days like the spoof). (269) There is a learned apparatus criticus about disputed or variant ms. readings. He did the Latin poems, together with his Oxford colleagues and friends John Powell (270) and Ronald Knox (271) and the Etonian and former Cambridge undergraduate A. B. Ramsay. (272) There is an appendix of alternative Latin versions which the translators obviously could not bear to waste. Kipling contributed a schoolboyish prose version of ‘The Pro-consuls’: ‘the sixth ode, as it seems, rendered into English prose by a scholiast of uncertain period’, which starts:
    ellauri141.html on line 573: This, though now ascribed to a pedant rather than a boy, is clearly what Kipling had mentioned to Fletcher earlier:
    ellauri141.html on line 599: Huntuvuori oli syntynyt 1887 ja hän valmistui kansakoulunopettajaksi Jyväskylän seminaarista vuonna 1910. Opettajantoimensa ohella Huntuvuori oli intohimoinen historian harrastaja sekä tutkija. Suomen esihistoriaan liittyvät väitöskirjan esityöt kuitenkin tuhoutuivat Huntuvuoren koulun tulipalossa Sääksmäellä ja työ jäi kesken. Vai jäikö? Mervi Kannelniemen alustavat tutkimukset Huntuvuoren elämänvaiheisiin nostavat esiin monia avoimia kysymyksiä.
    ellauri141.html on line 601: Hilda Huntuvuori toimi diakonaattiyhdistyxen puheenjohtajana, jäsenenä kansanopiston johtokunnassa sekä kunnallisissa lautakunnissa. Hän kuului historian ja opetusalan seuroihin ja Suomen kirjailijaliittoon. Lisäksi hän oli yhdessä Helmi Krohnin kanssa Suomeen perustetun Spiritualistisen seuran kantavia voimia. Opintomatkoja Hilda teki Ruoziin, Norjaan, Tanskaan ja Viroon. Kokoelma sisältää myös laajan kirjeenvaihdon. Aineistoa on 61 kansiota eli 2.9 hyllymetriä.
    ellauri141.html on line 603: Huntuvuori kirjoitti sittemmin lukuisia historiallisia romaaneja sekä kansakoulun lukukirjoja. Sääksmäen muutenkin merkilliseen ja rikkaseen historiaan Huntuvuoren voimakas ja näkyvä persoonallisuus sekä yhteiselämä taiteilija Saimi Hämäläisen kanssa toi värikkään lisänsä. Vuonna 1965 Huntuvuorelle myönnettiin opetusneuvoksen arvonimi. Hilda Huntuvuori kuoli vuonna 1968.
    ellauri141.html on line 630: Huntuvuoren historialliset romaanit eivät savuttaneet Mika Waltarin globaalia suosiota, mutta täysin uusi tuttavuus tämä naiskirjailija oli allekirjoittaneelle.
    ellauri141.html on line 640: Huntuvuoren vanhemmat olivat maanviljelijä Kaarle Huntuvuori (Hollmén) ja Iida Laurén. Hän valmistui kansakoulunopettajaksi 1910 ja hän toimi sitten opettajana Sääksmäen Jutikkalan koulussa aina eläkkeelle jäämiseensä saakka 1947, joskin 1913-1914 hän oli Jyväskylän harjoituskoulun opettaja ja 1914-1915 Pukinmäen kokeilukoulun opettaja. Huntuvuori opiskeli opettajan työn ohessa Helsingin yliopistossa ja hän valmistui filosofian kandidaatiksi pääaineenaan Pohjoismaiden historia. Hän aikoi tehdä väitöskirjan Suomen keskiajan historiasta, mutta väitöskirjaa varten kerätty aineisto tuhoutui Jutikkalan koulun tulipalossa 1921. Tämän jälkeen Huntuvuori hyödynsi tietojaan kirjoittamalla historiallisia keskiaikaan sijoittuvia romaaneja. Hän kirjoitti myös jatkokertomuksia, joita julkaistiin lehdissä. Opetusneuvoksen arvon hän sai 1965.
    ellauri141.html on line 648: Lälli Kooroxen pojat, historiallinen kertomus 1100-luvun loppupuoliskolta. WSOY 1926.
    ellauri141.html on line 652: Suuri unelma, historiallinen romaani. Kirjokansi, Turku 1946
    ellauri141.html on line 654: Harmaa vaeltaja, historiallinen kertomus 1300-luvulta. Aura, Turku 1947
    ellauri141.html on line 665: Artikkelissani tarkastelen keskiaikaista Turkua. Aineistonani ovat kansakoulunopettaja, sittemmin opetusneuvos Hilda Huntuvuoren (1887-1968, vuoteen 1906 Hollmen). Hän kirjoitti 1920-1930-luvuilla nää historialliset romaanit. Ne käsittelevät
    ellauri141.html on line 666: Suomen varhaiskeskiaikaa 900-luvulta vuoteen 1337 ja muodostavat kahdeksanosaisen Kultaranta-sarjan. Ensimmäinen kirja julkaistiin vuonna 1920 ja viimeinen 1945.^ Teokset sisältävät monien muiden Suomen historian tapahtumien lisäksi kirjailijan tulkinnan varhaisesta Turusta ja sen perustamisesta. Nykylukijalle silmiinpistävää on, että kirjoissa kuvataan Turkua 1100 - 1200-luvuilla, eh, kauan ennen kuin kaupunki viime vuosina vakiintuneen tulkinnan mukaan on perustettu. 1990- ja 2000-luvun kaivausten perusteella Turkuun on syntynyt kaupunkimainen asutus 1300-luvun alussa, ja sitä on edeltänyt 1200-luvun maaseutuasutus.
    ellauri141.html on line 669: Lukijalle voi herätä kysymys, miksi historiantutkijan kannattaa pohtia jo kauan sitten unohdetun kirjailijan mielikuvituksen tuotetta.
    ellauri141.html on line 671: Käsitykseni Huntuvuoren Turku-kuvan merkityksestä ja siten kiinnostavuudesta perustuu historioitsija Derek Fewsterin unohdetussa väitöskirjassaan esittämiin tulkintoihin siitä, kuinka historian käyttö kansallisen identiteetin muodostuksessa 1900-luvun alun Suomessa nojasi vahvasti arkipäiväiseen toistoon ja ’’alemman tason mielikuvanluojien” (lesser image-makers) kuten toimittajien, opettajien, kuvittajien ja nuortenkirjailijoiden työhön. Tämä ruohonjuuritason työ vaikutti
    ellauri141.html on line 677: merkitystä historiallisen tiedon välittäjänä jopa omaa historiantutkimustaan
    ellauri141.html on line 682: Suomen nuoressa tasavallassa historiankirjoitus oli vahvasti nationalistista ja historiantutkimuksella pyrittiin todistamaan Suomen erityisasema historiassa. Historiantutkijoiden valtaosa asettui valkoisen Suomen tutkijoiksi.
    ellauri141.html on line 690: Elämyksellinen uskonnollisuus, mystiikka ja okkultismi olivat 1900-luvun alussa suosittuja Euroopan sivistyneistöpiireissä, myös Suomessa. Monissa liikkeissä naiset olivat merkittäviä vaikuttajia ja johtajia. Hilda Huntuvuoren ajattelun ja kirjoittamisen taustalla on vaikuttanut kristillispohjainen spiritualismi. Hän toimi aktiivise￾na jäsenenä Suomen Spiritualistisessa seurassa, kävi kirjeenvaihtoa seuran kantavan voiman Helmi Krohnin kanssa ja kirjoitti käsikirjoituksen spiritualismin historiasta Krohnin tekstin pohjalta.
    ellauri141.html on line 692: Suuri historiallinen tarina on se, kuinka varhaiskeskiajan suomalaiset ottivat ohjat omiin käsiinsä ja vaativat itselleen palkan maailmassa. Sisäiset kiistat ja
    ellauri141.html on line 703: Esimerkiksi nimimerkki H. E. V toteaa Naisten äänessä arvostellessaan Piispa Tuomasta, että "historialliset romaanit saattavat olla parhaita oppaita menneisyyden mutkittelevalla, hämärällä tutkimustiellä. Huntuvuoren teos on luotettava tiennäyttäjä - vaikkakin lukija voi eräissä yksityiskohdissa olla tekijän kanssa eri mieltä ja vaikkakin joskus jää toivomaan psykologisesti vakuuttavampaa sanontaa.” Huntuvuori liikkui muutenkin kirjailijan- ja tutkijanauktoriteetin välimaastossa: hän ei ollut aikalaisten silmissä ammattihistorioitsija, mutta hän julkaisi ajoittain myös tieteellisiä tekstejä, ja hänet mainittiin tutkijana. Tiettävästi Huntuvuori keräsi aineistoa keskiajan historiaa käsittelevään väitöskirjaan, mutta koira söi muistiinpanot Jutikkalan koulun palossa vuonna 1921.
    ellauri141.html on line 705: Huntuvuori arvostelee 1100-luvulle sijoittuvan Selma Anttilan romaanin Kalliotaatto. Hän löytää paljon huomautettavaa historiallisten faktojen paikkansapitävyydestä, mutta tuomitsee romaanin lopuksi erityisesti, koska se kuvaa suomalaiset alkukantaisina ja kehittymättöminä:
    ellauri141.html on line 721: Samana vuonna 2012 Hilda Huntuvuoren syntymästä tuli kuluneeksi 125 vuotta. Kirjailijan jäämistöstä oli löytynyt käsikirjoitus Nuori Maunu Koivisto. Monet seniorit muistavat Hilda Huntuvuoren myös kansakoulun lukukirjoista, joita hän toimitti yhdessä E.A. Saarimaan kanssa. Hilda Huntuvuoren esittämän mielipiteen mukaan ”historialliset romaanit eivät vanhene koskaan”.
    ellauri141.html on line 729: Suomen piispa on vahvasti Henrikiä esittävän Sami Maarasen varassa. Hän on näyttämöllä mukana jokaisessa kohtauksessa. Tässä roolissa Huntuvuoren näkemykset Henrikin historiasta ja taustoista menevät minulle faktoina, Maaranen hymyilee.
    ellauri141.html on line 755: Alexis Leger (pronounced [ləʒe]; 31 May 1887 – 20 September 1975), better known by his pseudonym Saint-John Perse (French: [pɛʁs]; also Saint-Leger Leger),[1] was a French poet-diplomat, awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1960 "for the soaring flight and evocative imagery of his poetry." He was a major French diplomat from 1914 to 1940, after which he lived primarily in the United States until 1967.
    ellauri141.html on line 757: Alexis Leger was born in Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe. His great-grandfather, a solicitor, had settled in Guadeloupe in 1815. His grandfather and father were also solicitors; his father was also a member of the city council. The Leger family owned two plantations, one of coffee (La Joséphine) and the other of sugar (Bois-Debout).
    ellauri141.html on line 759: In 1897, Hégésippe Légitimus, the first native Guadeloupan elected president of the Guadeloupe General Council, took office with a vindictive agenda towards colonists. The Leger family returned to metropolitan France in 1899 and settled in Pau. The young Alexis felt like an expatriate and spent much of his time hiking, fencing, riding horses and sailing in the Atlantic. He passed the baccalauréat with honours and began studying law at the University of Bordeaux. When his father died in 1907, the resulting strain on his family's finances led Leger to temporarily interrupt his studies, but he eventually completed his degree in 1910.
    ellauri141.html on line 761: In 1904, he met the poet Francis Jammes at Orthez, who became a close friend. He frequented cultural clubs, and met Paul Claudel, Odilon Redon, Valery Larbaud and André Gide. Paha merkki, todellakin! He wrote short poems inspired by the story of Robinson Crusoe (Images à Crusoe) and undertook a translation of Pindar. He published his first book of poetry, Éloges, in 1911.
    ellauri141.html on line 763: While in China, Leger had written his first extended poem Anabase, publishing it in 1924 under the pseudonym "Saint-John Perse", which he employed for the rest of his life. He then published nothing for two decades, not even a re-edition of his debut book, as he believed it inappropriate for a diplomat to publish fiction. After Briand's death in 1932, Leger served as Inspector Leger under Comissaire Maigret (Quai d'Orfevres) until 1940. Within the Foreign Office he led the optimist faction that believed that Germany was unstable and that if Britain and France stood up to Hitler, he would back down. Har har. A gifted diplomat.
    ellauri141.html on line 765: During his American exile, he wrote his long poems Exil, Vents, Pluies, Neiges, Amers, and Chroniques. He remained in the US long after the end of the war. He travelled extensively, observing nature and enjoying the friendship of US Attorney General Francis Biddle and his spouse, philanthropist Beatrice Chanler, and author Katherine Garrison Chapin. He was on good terms with the UN Secretary General and author Dag Hammarskjöld whose plain crashed in suspicious circumstances in 1961, just after Pink Panther got his Nobel prize. Foul play?
    ellauri141.html on line 767: In 1957, American friends gave him a villa at Giens, Provence, France. He then split his time between France and the United States. In 1958, he married the American Dorothy Milburn Russell.
    ellauri141.html on line 771: A few months before he died in 1975, Leger donated his library, manuscripts and private papers to Fondation Saint-John Perse, a research centre devoted to his life and work (Cité du Livre, Aix-en-Provence), which remains active to the present day. He died in his villa in Giens and is buried nearby. Varsinainen kermaperse tää Saint-John.
    ellauri141.html on line 781: Vittu mitä pyörittelyä. Ihan Löden kirkkohissan aineen tasoa. Mitähän runoilija on oikein tarkoittanut tässä? Ensinnäkään Bernie ei tiedä onko tää runo vaiko kertomus. Saattaahan olla vielä muitakin mahdollisuuxia. Jos se on vaikka ostoslista. No ei, Bernie ei usko genreihin. (Tuli tossa muuten mieleen, että Raamatun kertomus Ruthista on oikeastaan romcom. Siinä on kaikki sen genren tuntomerkit.) Tarvitaan uusia muotoja, uusia muotoja tarvitaan. Jossei niitä saada, se on sama kuin ei olisi koko taidetta. (Jussi Jurkka, p.c.) No ei, Bernhard päätyy ehdottamaan, että koska plöräyxessä ei ole havaittavissa minkään maakunnan juonta, se onkin lyyrinen proosaruno.
    ellauri141.html on line 794: Gordon Wenham, on the other hand, understands the verse to indicate Jabal was the first "dweller with herds." That is, he was the "father of the Bedouin lifestyle." He notes that whereas Abel "merely lived off his flocks," Jabal could "trade with his beasts of burden," and that this "represents cultural advance." Ensimmäinen rättipää.
    ellauri141.html on line 800: Dag Hammarskjöld was committed to the arts. Though temperamentally a loner, and introvert, and a bachelor throughout his life (oliko se homo? Det finns inga bevis för att Dag Hammarskjöld var homosexuell. Misstankar verkar dock ha funnits: Eftersom han levde ensam började rykten spridas om att han skulle vara homosexuell och hans motståndare använde detta för att smutskasta honom), he would invite intellectuals and artists, the best of New York’s bohemia, to his Upper East Side apartment where he kept a pet, an African monkey called Greenback. People he invited to his generous dinners included the poet Carl Sandburg, the novelist John Steinbeck, the poet WH Auden, the diplomat George Kennan. Auden was the translator of Hammarskjöld’s posthumously published book of observations, ideas and poems called Waymarks. Hammarskjöld used his influence to get the poet Ezra Pound out of mental hospital. Back in Sweden, he inherited his father’s chair at the Swedish academy when the man died in 1953. The Swedish academy is the body that awards the Nobel Prize in literature. Hammarskjöld was instrumental in getting the rather obscure but doubtless brilliant French poet Saint John Perse his Nobel prize in 1960. He would sketch out the arguments for Perse’s candidacy during translation breaks at UN Security Council meetings.
    ellauri142.html on line 47: Markku, throughout the entire history of War and Peace, is a man in search of inner fulfillment. His "illegitimate " birth (though his father does acknowledge and legitimize him) is partly what gives him a vague sense of inferiority, and he feels himself an outsider.
    ellauri142.html on line 53: At the opening of the novel, Markku is a young man who has recently returned to Russia to seek a career after completing his education abroad. Although a well-meaning, kind hearted young man, he is awkward and out of place in the Russian high society in whose circles he starts to move. Markku, though intelligent, is not dominated by reason, as his friend Prince Andrei Nikolayevich Balkongsky is. His lack of direction leads him to fall in with a group of profligate young men like Anatole Kuragin and Dolokhov whose pranks and heavy drinking cause mild scandals. After a particularly outrageous escapade in which a policeman is strapped to the back of a bear and thrown into a river, Markku is sent away from St. Petersburg. What happened to the poor bear?
    ellauri142.html on line 55: Markku's life changes after he becomes the sole heir to his father's vast estate, and his position in society is changed from that of an illegitimate son to the new Count Bezukhov. His inability to control his emotions and sexual passions lead him into a marriage with the vapid but sexually beautiful Princess Kristina, a match which her self-serving father, Prince Carl Erik, sets up to secure his access to Markku's newly acquired vast fortune. Kristina is not in love with Markku, and has affairs. From jealousy, Markku shoots his suspected lover, Dolokhov, in a duel. He is distraught at having committed such a crime and eventually separates from Kristina and then becomes a Freemason. His madhat escape into the city of Moscow and his subsequent obsessive belief that he is destined to be Napoleon’s mistress show his submission to irrational impulses. Yet his search for meaning in his life and for how to overcome his emotions are a central theme of the novel. He eventually finds love and marriage with Pirkko Hiekkala, becomes a ladies shoes salesman called Al Bundy and their marriage is perhaps the culmination of a life of moral and spiritual questioning. They have four children: three boys and one girl. Correction, one extremely good-looking platinum blonde girl and one about equally gifted son.
    ellauri142.html on line 63: Markku is an outcast. The awkward, illegitimate son of a dazzlingly wealthy Count, he was educated in France but returns to Russia now that his father’s health is in decline. Polite society shuns him for his hero-worship of Napoleon and enthusiasm for the politics of revolution. But his blundering sincerity charms Andrei, his truest friend; and the blonde air hostess Natacha, who delights in his presence. He is quickly married off by stealth through the manipulation of others around him and is likely to face further heartache given that his wife prefers bedding her brother. It looks like this unlikely hero is smitten with her mother Pirkko Hiekkala but is set for heartache given his kind and gentle nature.
    ellauri142.html on line 75: In the 1870s, Tolstoy experienced a profound moral crisis, followed by what he regarded as an equally profound spiritual awakening, as outlined in his non-fiction work A Confession (1882). His overly literal interpretation of the ethical teachings of Jesus, centering on the Sermon on the Mount, caused him to become a fervent Christian anarchist and pacifist. His ideas on nonviolent resistance, expressed in such works as The Kingdom of God Is Within You (1894), had a profound impact on such pivotal 20th-century figures as Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther, and Stephen King.
    ellauri142.html on line 77: The Tolstoys were a well-known family of old Russian nobility who traced their ancestry to a mythical nobleman named Indris described by Pyotr Tolstoy as arriving "from Nemec, from the lands of Caesar" (Lithuania, from the sound of it) to Chernigov in 1353 along with his two sons Litvinos (or Litvonis) and Zimonten (or Zigmont) and a dozen or maybe 3000 people. Indris was then converted to Eastern Orthodoxy, under the name of Leonty, and his sons as Konstantin and Feodor. Konstantin's grandson Andrei Kharitonovich was nicknamed Tolstoy (fatso) by Vasily II of Moscow after he moved from Chernigov to Moscow.
    ellauri142.html on line 79: Tolstoy was born at Yasnaya Polyana, a family estate 12 kilometres (7.5 mi) southwest of Tula, and 200 kilometres (120 mi) south of Moscow. He was the fourth of five children of Count Nikolai Ilyich Tolstoy (1794–1837), a veteran of the Patriotic War of 1812, and Countess Mariya Tolstaya (née Volkonskaya; 1790–1830). His mother died when she was two and his father when he was nine. Tolstoy and his siblings were brought up by relatives. In 1844, he began studying law and oriental languages at Kazan University, where teachers described him as "both unable and unwilling to learn".
    ellauri142.html on line 81: Tolstoy left the university in the middle of his studies, returned to Yasnaya Polyana and then spent much time in Moscow, Tula and Saint Petersburg, leading a lax and leisurely lifestyle. He began writing during this period, including his first novel Childhood, a fictitious account of his own youth, which was published in 1852.
    ellauri142.html on line 85: In 1851, after running up heavy gambling debts, he went with his older brother to the Caucasus and joined the army. Tolstoy served as a young artillery officer during the Crimean War and was in Sevastopol during the 11-month-long siege of Sevastopol in 1854–55, including the Battle of the Chernaya. During the war he was recognised for his courage and promoted to lieutenant. He was appalled by the number of tragic deaths involved in warfare, and left the army after the end of the Crimean War.
    ellauri142.html on line 87: His experience in the army, and two trips around Europe in 1857 and 1860–61 converted Tolstoy from a dissolute and privileged society author to a non-violent and spiritual anarchist. Others who followed the same path were Markku Graae, Alexander Gerzen, Mikhail Bakunin and Peter Kropotkin. During his 1857 visit, Tolstoy suffered a public execution in Paris, a traumatic experience that marked the rest of his life. In a letter to his friend Vasily Botkin, Tolstoy wrote: "The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens ... Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.
    ellauri142.html on line 91: Prize motivation: "in consideration of the power of observation, originality of imagination, virility of ideas and remarkable talent for narration which characterize the creations of this world-famous author." As a poet, short story writer, journalist and novelist, Rudyard Kipling described the British colonial empire in positive terms, which made his poetry popular in the British Army. Contemporary Great Britain appreciated him for his depictions of the British colony of India. The Jungle Book (1894) has made him known and loved by children throughout the world, especially thanks to Disney’s 1967 film adaptation.
    ellauri142.html on line 100: “George Washington was a Mason, along with 13 other presidents and numerous Supreme Court Justices. Benjamin Franklin published a book about Freemasonry on his own printing press. Nine signers of the Declaration of Independence were Freemasons, including the man with way the biggest signature of all: John Hancock.” Put your Hancock right here on the line if it fits, like Babbitt said.
    ellauri142.html on line 102: At the turn of the 16th Century, William Schaw developed his own club-like culture, housed within a lodge, and infused with a set of rules for sworn members, including, “They shall be true to one another and live charitably together as becometh sworn brethren and companions of the Craft.”
    ellauri142.html on line 106: In 1717, Masonry created a formal organization in London, when four lodges united to form the first Grand Lodge. This gave the organization credibility and added to its membership’s mystical allure. Men flocked, begged, coerced, and maneuvered to become members. Everybody wanted in.
    ellauri142.html on line 120: Long ago, when the British government and the Catholic Church were more militant, it was dangerous to share these secrets, so all members worked hard to protect them. This is why, for several centuries, the coveted secrets of the Freemasons were known only to loyal members.
    ellauri142.html on line 122: While the rest of the world is no longer fearful of Freemasonry, The Catholic Church continues to warn its “faithful” of Freemasonry’s alleged anti-church teachings. In 1983, the papal state declared that Catholics “who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion.” This proclamation comes from the same church that continues to profess that women are not holy or God-ordained enough to be in the priesthood.
    ellauri142.html on line 167: Vittu mitä pellejä! Jo on lapsellista touhua. According to the historian David Stevenson, it was influential on Freemasonry as it was emerging in Scotland. Robert Vanloo (n.h.) states that earlier 17th century Rosicrucianism had a considerable influence on Anglo-Saxon Masonry. Hans Schick sees in the works of Comenius (1592–1670) the ideal of the newly born English Masonry before the foundation of the Grand Lodge in 1717. Comenius was in England during 1641. Their mission is to prepare the whole wide world for a new phase in religion, which includes awareness of the inner worlds and the subtle bodies, and to provide safe guidance in the gradual awakening of man's latent spiritual faculties during the next six centuries toward the coming Age of Aquariums. This is the dawning of it, judging by the sea levels. According to Masonic writers, the Order of the Rose Cross is expounded in a major Christian literary work that molded the subsequent spiritual beliefs of western civilization: The Divine Comedy (ca. 1308–1321) by Dante Alighieri.
    ellauri142.html on line 174: While some lodges have a regionalized, secret lexicon, the most famous secret Masonic word is “Ma-ha-boner,” or “Mahabone.” This word is commonly known to mean “The lodge doors are open.”
    ellauri142.html on line 192: Paul Wagner is an Intuitive-Empath, clairvoyant reader, and a 5-time EMMY Award winning writer. He created “The Personality Cards,” a powerful Oracle-Tarot deck that’s helpful in life, love and relationships. Paul studied with Lakota elders in the Pecos Wilderness, who nurtured his empathic abilities and taught him the sacred rituals. He has lived at ashrams with enlightened masters, including Amma, the Hugging Saint, for whom he’s delivered.
    ellauri142.html on line 264: Humboldtin veljexiä oli 2, Alexander oli maantieteilijä, Wilhelm kielentutkija. Mulla on joku sen kielitieteen kirja hyllyssä. Joo Linguistic Variability & Intellectual Development. Pokkari. Onkohan se lyhennetty painos, Ei ole, vaikka lukuja on yhdistelty. Originally published in 1836 in the Royal Academy of Sciences of Berlin under the title Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechz. Esipuheen on kirjoittanut Alexander-veli. Von Humboldt´s style is not a simple one for modern ears nor is his thought always clear. Despair was my constant companion, sanoi kääntäjä vuonna 1970.
    ellauri142.html on line 266: Alexander sanoo esipuheessa: I have a sad and serious duty to fulfil. Apparently Wilhelm had just joined his ancestors (or theirs). Luckily professor Franz Bopp offered assistance. Wilhelm kävi kirjeenvaihtoa myös A.W.v.Schegelin, Colonel Pickeringin, ja Champollionin kaa (loput nimet oli mulle n.h.). Wilhelmillä oli attraktiivinen Tegel Castle lentokentän lähellä, jossa se herrasteli loppupeleissä perheensä kera.
    ellauri142.html on line 291: Lakkaamatta on meneillä suuri vexelien lunastuksen toiminta, jonka tietysti pitää olla sisäinen, koska sen päätarkoitus on ize kunkin sisäisen lapsen lunastaminen (keneltä ja millä diskonttokorolla, sitä ei kylläkään kerrota). Jumalallisen valon hajavalosta tulee virtaa ja niin henkinen valo osuu häneen. Ja niin usein kuin tämä tulee apinassa itsetietoisuudeksi, syntyy hänestä lunastaja, hänen oman jumalallisen olemuksensa turilas. Tämän ovat myös monet kristityt ja mystikot tietäneet ja tunteneet; kristinopin opetus henkisestä uudelleensyntymästä ei ole mitään muuta kuin oppi siitä, kuinka jumalan kuteminen jälleen herää humalapäisyydexi apinassa. Niin kuin vertauskuvallisesti on esitetty mm. Uudessa testamentissa, jokainen itse on oman elämänsä Ärjylä; jokaisella on oma sotavaununsa ts. hänen hämäräperäisisllä supervoimilla varustettu luontosuhteensa; siellä on myös hänen henkinen johtajansa (J. Krishna) ottanut asuntonsa ja se antaa maalliselle apinalle neuvojaan. Kun siis apina itsetietoisesti liittyy lunastajaansa, jolla on hänessä sijoitusasuntonsa, ovat kers. Ärjylä ja kapt. Kalpa, Adam ja Eva yhtyneet. ”Lastenvaunut” tulevat silloin meissä asuvan jumalan hengen temppeliksi, sillä Ärjylä on transumies, omaa asiaansa ajatteleva apina ja kapt. Kalpa ex-koiras apinoiden planeetalta, ”uusi puusta pudonnut gorilla", joka asustelee maallisessa apinassa, mutta myös hänen yläpuolellaan ja koputtaa lattiaa jos alakerrasta tuleee älämölöä; ja ainoastaan apinan tullessa alienixi, joka ize asiassa on todellinen ja oikea apina, saattaa maallinen marakatti päästä korkean ihanteensa toteuttamiseen ja vapautua petoxhishta, ahdishtuxhesta sekä shynnistä.
    ellauri142.html on line 330: Thomas à Kempis (c. 1380 – 25 July 1471; German: Thomas von Kempen; Dutch: Thomas van Kempen) was a German-Dutch canon regular of the late medieval period and the author of The Imitation of Christ, one of the most popular and best known Christian devotional books. His name means "Thomas of Kempen", Kempen being his home town. While the form Thomas à Kempis (with a faux-French accent on the à) is often found, it is actually incorrect. The correct Latin should be Thomas a Kempis (…from Kempen), as borne out by surviving contemporary mentions of his name.
    ellauri142.html on line 535: Joka ruumiista erotessaan ainoastaan Minua ajattelee, se saapuu ruumiinsa jätettyään Minun olemukseeni. Epäilemättä. No doubt. Mitä vitun nekrofiilejä nää oikein on. Parking meter violation. Viola oli Loppiaisaaton nuori nainen joka huuhtoutui rannalle ja kysyi pelastajiltansa: mikä maa mikä valuutta? What country, friends, is this? Norjalaissyntyiselle Annikalle meinas käydä kehnosti Saapin takaluukussa, vaan eipä käynytkään. Aum, sano, suloisuuden suloisuus. Aum mani padme, mene mene tekel ufarsin, stiiknafuulia. Näitä piisaa näitä taikasanoja. Eeli eeli laama sabakhtani, Expecto patronum. Voi hemmetti. Seesam aukene. Hokkus pokkus. Abrakadabra. Abrakapokus! Vampyyri muuttuu alapäästä lepakoxi. Uni hyvä verelle. Ei helvetti, ei jaxa.
    ellauri142.html on line 544: The ninth chapter of the Bhagavad Gita is Raja Vidya Yoga. In this chapter, Krishna explains that He is Supreme and how this material existence is created, maintained and destroyed by His Yo-yo and all beings come and go under his supervision like in North Korea. He reveals the Role and the Importance of Bhakti...
    ellauri142.html on line 548: ”Suurista ja pyhistä asioista pitää puhua ainoastaan korkeassa ja jalossa mielessä eli majesteetillisessä sieluntilassa.” (Eckhart) Vähän vaikeeta se on kun joku koko ajan vieressä päästää pahanhajuisia puuppia.
    ellauri142.html on line 555: Se on TAT, jonka kädet ja jalat, silmät, pää ja kasvot ovat kaikkialla. Kuulostaa vähän Donald Trumpilta. Kaikkialla itäeurooppalaisen blondin hameen alla nimittäin. Parabrâhman Brahmân yläpuolella, takana oleva (Para, takana); tuo nimittämätön, mittaamaton, punnitsematon; juureton juuri ja syytön syy. Kaiken olemassa olevan perusta. Sama kuin TAT, kaikkeuden lähde. Sanalla Brahmâ on kahdenlainen merkitys. Yksi on Brahmâ, hengitys, toinen Brahmâ, tuo luova, kehittävä miehis-naisellinen voima maailmankaikkeudessa. Tätä pitää ihan sisäisesti miettiä, ennen kuin käsittää tuon eron. — Suomentaja. Se on serveri, se on serveri, tuo mainio makkaramies. Hän siittää ja Hän hävittää. Kaikilla eläimillä on hissinnappi, joka sanoo ’ylös’ ja ’alas’; Jumalalla sitä ei ole. (Eckhart)
    ellauri142.html on line 570: The tenth chapter of the Bhagavad Gita is Vibhooti Yoga. In this chapter, Krishna reveals Himself as the cause of all causes. He describes His various manifestations and opulences in order to increase Arjuna's Bhakti. Arjuna is fully convinced of Lord's paramount position and proclaims him to be...
    ellauri142.html on line 572: Kaikki on siis Krishnan syytä. Sitä ehinkin jo uumoilla. Krishtushkin oli syntipukki, kuten kaimansa. Jumalasta ei ole monta kopiota, vaan se ainut laatuaan ja kaikki kaikessa. (Paizi nippu puuppia, sanoinhan sen jo.) Senpä tautta muurareiden looshissakin on vapaakappale myös Herran viisua. On siellä varmemmaxi vakuudexi myös Koraani ja Gideon's Bible. Two men say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong. Or else they are in fact one and the same. They do it with mirrors, motherfuckers. Hän ilmenee meille erinäisillä tavoilla, milloin paxuna inkkarina, milloin partapozona.
    ellauri142.html on line 602: maailmat kauhistuneina. Mahtava peräsin sulla kyllä on ja pulleat purjeet.
    ellauri142.html on line 605: Mitä pannahista tää Herpertti tässä oikein höläjää? Onxtää edes sukua sille runoniekka Spencerille? Ja sitäpaizi kekä on tää toisen salaopin tuhertanut Blavazky? Molemmat näyttää edustavan 1800-luvun lopun uskonnollis-aatteellista oikeistohätää, jonka aikaansai Darwinin ja Marxin liian hyvät selityxet apinoiden puuhille.
    ellauri142.html on line 609: Spencer's reputation among the Victorians owed a great deal to his agnosticism. He rejected theology as representing the 'impiety of the pious.' He was to gain much notoriety from his repudiation of traditional religion, and was frequently condemned by religious thinkers for allegedly advocating atheism and materialism. Nonetheless, unlike Thomas Henry Huxley, whose agnosticism was a militant creed directed at 'the unpardonable sin of faith' (in Adrian Desmond's phrase), Spencer insisted that he was not concerned to undermine religion in the name of science, but to bring about a reconciliation of the two. The following argument is a summary of Part 1 of his First Principles (2nd ed 1867).
    ellauri142.html on line 611: Starting either from religious belief or from science, Spencer argued, we are ultimately driven to accept certain indispensable but literally inconceivable notions. Whether we are concerned with a Creator or the substratum which underlies our experience of phenomena, we can frame no conception of it. Therefore, Spencer concluded, religion and science agree in the supreme truth that the human understanding is only capable of 'relative' knowledge. This is the case since, owing to the inherent limitations of the human mind, it is only possible to obtain knowledge of phenomena, not of the reality ('the absolute') underlying phenomena. Hence both science and religion must come to recognise as the 'most certain of all facts that the Power which the Universe manifests to us is utterly inscrutable.' He called this awareness of 'the Unknowable' and he presented worship of the Unknowable as capable of being a positive faith which could substitute for conventional religion. Indeed, he thought that the Unknowable represented the ultimate stage in the evolution of religion, the final elimination of its last anthropomorphic vestiges.
    ellauri142.html on line 643: Päistikkaan he syöksyvät ammottaviin kitoihisi, joiden julmat hampaat ovat kauheat nähdä. Muutamat tarttuvat inhottavasti hampaittesi väliin ja heidän päänsä murskaksi jauhautuvat.
    ellauri142.html on line 644: Niin kuin hyttyset kiireesti lentävät polkupyöräilijän suuhun, niin nämä maailmatkin äkillisessä nopeudessaan syöksyvät suihisi kuollaknseen ja kadotakseen.
    ellauri142.html on line 660: Kun nyt tuli puheexi, niin voisi tähän väliin vähän kerrata teologian luonnonhistoriaa. Alotetaan elukoista, kuten serkkuapinat, joilla ei tiettävästi ole minkäänlaista henkiolioiden palvontaa. Nää ns. älyttömät luontokappaleet jahtaavat ja pakenee vain toisiaan, ja bylsivät toisia samanlaisia milloin luvan saavat. Siinä kaikki, ja näyttävätpä olleen enimmäxeen aika tyytyväisiä, ennenkuin tää herra-apina tuli ja otti lähes kaikki villit elukoista hengiltä ja loput ruokakomeroonsa elinkautisvangixi.
    ellauri142.html on line 823: Moro taas van der Waals, taas tavataan. Jumalan rooli on sama kuin van der Waalsin apinoiden kunkulla: se on se isocheefi joka on olevinaan pikkuapinoiden puolella kun pahat silfverbäkit pikkucheefit riistää niitä ja raiskaa pikku peppuja. Pikkuapinat hurraa yläoxilla kuin isocheefi tuikkaa pikkucheefejä mehukkaasti takaapäin ja heittelee niitä johkin roskakuiluun vihreitä alaoxilta. Tän esityxen jälkeen kaikki silfverbäkit kokoontuu vapaamuurareiden looshissa ja juo kinkun kanssa maljoja valtavan kusetuxen onnistuttua.
    ellauri142.html on line 841: While the male yakshas are depicted in Hindu art and architecture as portly and deformed, the yakshis or yakshinis are depicted as women of great charm and beauty. We find references to the yakshas and yakshinis in the epics, the Puranas and in the works of ... etc.etc.
    ellauri142.html on line 842: Rakshasa, are cannibalistic beings in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism. Rakshasas are also called "man-eaters". Rakshas is also used to describe Asuras, which are power seeking deities that lack divinity. They are often depicted as antagonists in Dharmic religious scriptures.
    ellauri143.html on line 57: The Bharatiya Janata Party (pronounced [bʱɑːɾət̪iːjə dʒənət̪ɑː pɑːrtiː] ( listen); English: Indian People's Party; abbr. BJP) is one of two major political parties in India, along with the Indian National Congress. It has been the ruling political party of the Republic of India since 2014. The BJP is a right-wing party, and its policy has historically reflected Hindu nationalist positions. It has close ideological and organisational links to the much older Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). As of 2020, it is the country's largest political party in terms of representation in the national parliament and state assemblies and is by far the world's largest party in terms of primary membership, with the second largest party, the Communist Party of China, having about half the registered members of the BJP.
    ellauri143.html on line 59: On a day when Prime Minister Narendra Modi released the Thai translation of Thirukkural during his visit to Thailand, the official Twitter handle of the BJP’s Tamil Nadu unit released a picture of Tamil poet Thiruvalluvar clad in a saffron attire.
    ellauri143.html on line 60: In the picture tweeted on Saturday (November 2), Thiruvalluvar, who is revered in Tamil Nadu for authoring Thirukkural, a collection of 1,330 life-advice couplets, is seen smeared with sacred ash and wearing a rudraksha necklace and upper-arm bracelets. This is an entirely new portrayal of the ancient poet whose pictures has so far shown him attired only in white and without religious symbols.
    ellauri143.html on line 62: Though the scholars (Urai aasiriyargal, in Tamil) titled Thirukkural’s first chapter as ‘The Praise to God’ (Kadavul Vaazhthu), Thiruvalluvar has nowhere in his work mentioned the words ‘god’ or ‘religion’.
    ellauri143.html on line 63: The state BJP, it is alleged, has given a new inference to the couplet which has a religious overtone. The inference they provided goes like this — “What is the use of education when one who defies god and his believers?”
    ellauri143.html on line 66: The Dravidar Kazhagam, founded by social activist Periyar, is known for conducting Thirukkural conferences across the state. Its deputy president Kali Poongundran said that this shows the BJP’s true motives behind promoting Thirukkural.
    ellauri143.html on line 71: The history behind the picture of Valluvar is itself an interesting one. Painter KR Venugopal Sarma picturised him in 1950s and the painting was accepted by then chief minister CN Annadurai as the official picture of the poet.
    ellauri143.html on line 84: The Kura has been widely admired by scholars and influential leaders across the ethical, social, political, economical, religious, philosophical, and spiritual spheres over its history. These include Ilango Adigal (never heard), Kambar (n.h.), Leo Tolstoy, Mahatma Gandhi, Albert Schweitzer (heard ok), plus Constantius Joseph Beschi, Karl Graul, George Uglow Pope, Alexander Piatigorsky, and Yu Hsi (all n.h.). The work remains to be translated. Oops correct that, the text has been translated into at least 40 Indian languages including English, making it one of the most translated ancient works. Ever since it came to print for the first time in 1812, the Kura text has never been out of print. Whole trainloads lie "left on read" in Sri Lanka.
    ellauri143.html on line 86: Its author is praised for his innate nature of selecting the best virtues found in the known literature, like Juan Valdez the choicest coffee beans, and presenting them in a language that is common and acceptable to all (Tamil). The term Tirukkuṟaḷ is a compound word made of two individual terms, tiru and kuṟaḷ. The term tiru has as many as 19 different meanings but it means sacred. Kuṟaḷ means something like "short, concise, and abridged." Vizi näähän on Markku Envall-luokan aforismeja, Vaakku-Turmiola linjan törähdyxiä.
    ellauri143.html on line 142: "It's like opening a delicious pizza box," he says. He grabs one of women's feet and sticks her big toes in his mouth. "Mmm, foot lollipop," a second woman says, while she and the third woman rub ...
    ellauri143.html on line 190: If wife be wholly true to him who gained her as his bride,

    ellauri143.html on line 335: Though virtuous words his lips speak not, and all his deeds are ill

    ellauri143.html on line 343: Who on his neighbours' sins delights to dwell,

    ellauri143.html on line 344: The story of his sins, culled out with care, the world will tell.
    ellauri143.html on line 347: If each his own, as neighbours' faults would scan,

    ellauri143.html on line 406: Until you see his face with grateful gladness bright.
    ellauri143.html on line 432: Like heart of them that murderous weapons bear, his mind,

    ellauri143.html on line 445: Who other creatures' flesh consumes but not his own.
    ellauri143.html on line 518: What his own soul has felt as bitter pain,

    ellauri143.html on line 645: And duly for his kingdom's weal expends.
    ellauri143.html on line 653: He sees the world obedient all to his command.
    ellauri143.html on line 766: Faultless the king who first his own faults cures, and then

    ellauri143.html on line 856: Kinkun apurit. Explanation : Let (a minister) be chosen, after he has been tried by means of these four things, viz,-his virtue, (love of) money, (love of) sexual pleasure, and tear of (losing) life. And keep his relatives as hostages. Just tätä tematiikkaa oli valtaistuinpeleissä. Ei se ole vierasta kv. yrityxillekään. Steve Jobs varmaan luki näitä värssyjä. The Thirukkural way of Leadership. Mr. T. Kannan.
    ellauri143.html on line 888: Where king regards not all alike, but each in his degree,

    ellauri143.html on line 944: His officers, his friends, his enemies,

    ellauri143.html on line 996: The bliss to which his foes in vain aspire.
    ellauri143.html on line 1018: All whispered words and interchange of smiles repress,

    ellauri143.html on line 1101: That ain't a knife. Now this is a knife. Ubi bene ibi patria. (Kirjassa Valkoinen torakka oli virheellisesti toisin päin: Ibi bene ubi patria. Patrioottista potaskaa.)
    ellauri143.html on line 1148: Tää ystävyys on taas sellanen missä esitetään presiis vastakkaisia neuvoja omalta kannalta ja vähän muidenkin kannalta. Muiden pitäis kyllä pysytellä mun ystävinä thru thick and thin, mutta mun on parasta valita ystävät tosi huolella ja dumpata tyhmät köyhät ja rumat joukosta kuin kuumat perunat. Ystävyydestä on tullut ihan fetischi nykyaikana. Ne ovat lähempänä kuin lähin puhelin, ja klaaniajan suku-ja heimositeitä ei enää tarvita. Kelassa on aina ystävä. Kaikki bunkkaavat omissa yhden hengen kopeissa ja tapaavat lähisukulaisia lähinnä jouluna. Vasta vanhana ne huomaavat, että veri on vettä sakeampaa. Vihreävetisiä ikätovereita kuolee ympäriltä kuin keiloja, eikä nuoret sukulaiset välitä. Niillä on omat ystävät.
    ellauri143.html on line 1164: Explanation : Make friendship (with one) after ascertaining (his) character, birth defects, and the whole of his relations.
    ellauri143.html on line 1191: Like him who seeks his couch with unwashed feet,

    ellauri143.html on line 1221: Explanation : (A) pleasing (object) to his foes is he who reads not moral works, does nothing that is enjoined by them cares not for reproach and is not possessed of good qualities.
    ellauri143.html on line 1270: Who to his wife submits, his strange, unmanly mood

    ellauri143.html on line 1275: By him who dreads his wife, nor gives the other world a thought.
    ellauri143.html on line 1278: Who quakes before his wife will ever tremble too,

    ellauri143.html on line 1301: Aatelisen tunnistaa paizi hörökorvista niin ritarillisuudesta. Eliskä ezen pyllyn alla on hyvä hevonen. The goodly knight pricks his horse on the plain. The rain in Spain falls mainly on the plain. How kind of you to let me come.
    ellauri143.html on line 1351: Diversities of works give each his special worth.
    ellauri143.html on line 1391: Explanation : If the owner does not (personally) attend to his cultivation, his land will behave like an angry wife and yield him no pleasure.
    ellauri143.html on line 1396: Explanation : A man's true manliness consists in making himself the head and benefactor of his family. (Mitä vittua?)
    ellauri143.html on line 1427: Explanation : He who begs ought not to be angry (at a refusal); for even the misery of (his own) poverty should be a sufficient reason (for so doing)
    ellauri143.html on line 1465: IAGO: She may be honest yet. Tell me but this: Have you not sometimes seen a handkerchief Spotted with strawberries in your wife’s hand?
    ellauri143.html on line 1467: See Cassio wipe his beard with. - Shakespeare
    ellauri143.html on line 1482: In this resplendent armlets-bearing damsel live.


    ellauri143.html on line 1488: Sharing his meal: such is this golden maid's embrace.


    ellauri143.html on line 1505: Tamil Youths Ride on Toy Palmyra horses. In ancient Tamil Nadu, Tamil youths who fell in love with girls used to make a horse toy with Palmyra leaves and used to ride on it along the streets to make it public. Then the parents of the girls were forced to marry them. Though it was practised only by the Tamils in ancient India, the association of horse in this ritual show that it also came from the north. Horses came to India from outside. The oldest reference is in the Rig Veda.
    ellauri143.html on line 1510: Explanation : This malady (of lust) is manured by the talk of women and watered by the (harsh) words of my mother.
    ellauri143.html on line 1670: Mahayana-buddhalaisuudessa historialliseen Buddhaan viitataan usein nimityksellä Śākyamuni (´Śākya-heimon viisas´) tai Śākyamuni-buddha. Sūtrissa hän kutsuu itseään ja muita buddhia usein nimityksellä Tathāgata (´näin tullut´ / ´näin mennyt´). Muita Buddhaan viittaavia nimityksiä ovat Bhagavat (´Mestari´, ´Herra´) ja Sugata (´Hyvin kulkenut´ eli ´Hyvin sä vedät´). Näillä mennään.
    ellauri143.html on line 1731: Mietiskely tapahtuu rauhallisessa, miellyttävässä ja siistissä tilassa. Alttarina käytettävälle pöydälle voi asettaa Buddhan ja Bodhisattvan patsaita sekä pyhiä kirjoituksia ja ohjaajalle ostettu uhrilahja. Asennoksi otetaan vaijeritemppu-asento tai mikä tahansa mukava asento.
    ellauri143.html on line 1742: Bodhisattva (sanskritiksi बोधिसत्त्व,valaisinolio, "hän, jonka tavoitteena on valaiseminen") on henkilö, jolla on suuren tasavirran seurauksena hyvä valoteho (bodhicitta), eli spontaani toive saavuttaa täydellinen valaistus kaikkien muiden oliojen hyödyksi. Buddhalaisuudessa bodhisattva on yksi neljästä leevelistä, jotka apina voi saavuttaa elämänsä aikana (muiden ollessa sillä aikaa arjhat, buddha ja pratyekabuddha). Valtakoira-buddhalaisten mukaan bodhisattva on izevalaiseva olio, joka omasta suuren myötäelämisen tahdostaan palaa täydellisen valaisemisen sijaan nussittavaxi uudestaan, jotta voi johdattaa ennen omaa läpivalaisuaan kaikki muut olennot kohdevalaisimen alle ja pois pyllystä tulemisen kärsimyksestä. Siis eräänlainen pyhimys. Myötätunnon pyhimyxellä on aivan vimmatusti käsiä, ei lopu kätilöltä kädet ihan ensi hädässä. Vitun käteenvetoa koko touhutus, jos minulta kysytään. Tuskin kysytään.
    ellauri143.html on line 1747: Lopullisesti kyllästyin homojutku Harariin sen kirjan Homo Deus ansiosta. Mulkero ja talousliberaali pääoman luottomies se oli aiemmissakin väsäyxissä, muzen syvällinen kusipäisyys kävi ilmiselväxi etenkin tässä Homo Deus suolloxessa. Huomisen lyhyt historia hyvinkin, lyhyestä virsi kaunis. Vannoutuneena suklaaosaston miehenä se peukuttaa täpinöissään into piukeena tollasta kuolematonta koneapinaa, jonka voi vetää käyntiin selässä olevasta avaimesta, minkä jälkeen se paukuttaa symbaaleja yhteen kunnes veto loppuu. Vaan ei hätää, kierretään vieteri taas piukalle, niin meno jatkuu hamaan maailman tappiin asti. (Mikä tappi ei tosin enää ole apinoiden kohdalla kovin kaukana.) Ei tarvi siihen naisia eikä kohtuja, sen voi väsätä jossain koeputkessa ja siihen väkertää vielä kaikenlaista varaosaa, esim kalansilmät. Mitäs täällä tapahtuu? Eikai vaan duracell puput puuhastele turhanpäiväisessä lisääntymistoimessa? Se on vanhanaikaista, nyt trendataan me transuapinat. Avainta reikään, se tuntuu mukavalta, tekee kutaa kun tehdään vaijeritemppu selkäpuolelta.
    ellauri144.html on line 56: The rhetorician Quintilian regarded Odes as just about the only Latin lyrics worth reading: "He can be lofty sometimes, yet he is also full of charm and grace, versatile in his figures, and felicitously daring in his choice of words." The fictional hero Tom Jones recited his verses with feeling. Etenkin tätä: Ou ou ou, Dilailaa! Nou nou nou, Dilailaa!
    ellauri144.html on line 58: Vuonna 1777 Porthan nimitettiin kaunopuheisuuden professoriksi; virkaa oli hakenut myös Gabriel Tidgren. Porthan puhui kaunommin. Tidgren oli kauhu kaunanen. Porthanin luennot olivat tavattoman suosittuja, ja hän herätti oppilaissaan suurta ihailua. Paitsi Cicerosta ja Horatiuksesta hän luennoi kosolti ja paxulti myös muista aiheista: Hugo Grotiuksen ja edelleen Samuel Pufendorfin kehittämästä luonnonoikeudellisesta filosofiasta, oppihistoriasta ja jopa arkkitehtuurista. Porthan matkusteli paljon Suomessa, ja vuonna 1779 hän teki jopa matkan Saksaan ja tapasi sikäläisiä oppineita. Mä puolestani ostin virkaanastujaisrahalla käsipuhelimen (Nokia, siinä oli ulosvedettävä antenni) sekä IBM:n sylitietokoneen (sen minkä sitten ostivat kiinalaiset ja risti Lenovoxi, jossa oli näppäimistön keskellä kuminen klitoris). Joku ranskalainen pitkäkyntinen förbi sen kun matkustin Pariisiin tapaamaan sikäläisiä oppineita. Inhottava Inkeri ei suostunut korvaamaan vahinkoa laitosbudjetista. Se oli varmaan kade.
    ellauri144.html on line 65: In Epistle 2.2, Horace defends his retirement. His mind and temper have aged,
    ellauri144.html on line 66: along with his body. He looks back bemusedly at the rash confidence, the ambition to get ahead, that motivated his earlier writing. And now his poetic gift itself threatens to fall away, together with other games, notably lovemaking, that require youthful energy and zest (55-57). Philosophy, as he describes it, is most centrally the art of living well from day to day; of enjoying life’s gifts while you have them, and of accepting Nature’s high impersonal laws in preparation for that final retirement which is death (213-16).
    ellauri144.html on line 181:

    Phillu mainizee (175) Mandelin tykänneen Tito Puentesista ja Pupi Camposta niin paljon että muutti nimensä Babaluuxi. (Kolmas nimi on pianisti Joe Loco.) "Babalú" is a Cuban popular afro song written by Margarita Lecuona, the cousin of composers Ernestina and Ernesto Lecuona. The song title is a reference to the Santería deity Babalú Ayé. "Babalú" was the signature song of the fictional television character Ricky Ricardo, played by Desi Arnaz in the television comedy series I Love Lucy, though it was already an established musical number for Arnaz in the 1940s as evidenced in the 1946 film short Desi Arnaz and His Orchestra. By the time Arnaz had adopted the song, it had become a Latin American music standard, associated mainly with Cuban singer Miguelito Valdés, who recorded one of its many versions with Xavier Cugat and his Waldorf-Astoria Orchestra. Arnaz made the song a rather popular cultural reference in the United States.
    ellauri144.html on line 251: Did you actually mean gum dammar? Actually no. Nähtävästi sanat on vähän eri eri lähteissä. Kuvan lyricsissä on hirvi joka ezii suojaa vuorelta. Ja se pitää köyhistä ja el Zorron kuivasta joenuomasta enemmänkuin merestä. Varmaan kaunistelua. Santanallakin (pyhä Anna) on maalaistyttölaulu, jossa on toi äskeinsen viisun viimeinen säkeistö. Suomennos on kiitos Google translate.
    ellauri144.html on line 263: The United States has long maintained a military base at Guantanamo in Cuba. This makes the U.S. adaptation of the song a multi-layer statement, to put it mildly. It's typically sung by freedom activists who would perhaps like to see that illegally torturing prison and military base close for good, though they don't usually employ the song to that end.
    ellauri144.html on line 287: Avrom Hirsch Goldbogen (aka Michael Todd) (born June 22, 1909 – March 22, 1958) was a JEWISH American theater and film producer, best known for his 1956 production of Around the World in 80 Days, which won an Academy Award for Best Picture. He is known as the third of Elizabeth Taylor's seven husbands, and is the only one whom she did not divorce (because he died in a private plane accident a year after their marriage).
    ellauri144.html on line 289: Avrom was born in Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Chaim Goldbogen (an Orthodox rabbi), and Sophia Hellerman, both of whom were Polish Jewish immigrants. He was one of nine children in a poor family, the youngest son, and his siblings nicknamed him "Tod" (pronounced "Toat" in German) to mimic his difficulty pronouncing the word "coat." It was from this that his name was derived. Nomen erat omen.
    ellauri144.html on line 290: He eventually dropped out of high school, and worked at a variety of jobs, including shoe salesman and store window decorator. One of his first jobs was as a soda jerk. When the drugstore went out of business, Todd had acquired enough medical knowledge from his work there to be hired at Chicago's Michael Reese Hospital as a type of "security guard" to stop visitors from bringing in food that was not on the patient's diet.
    ellauri144.html on line 292: The company he owned with his brother went bankrupt when its financial backing failed in the early days of the Great Depression. Not yet 21, Todd had lost over $1 million (equivalent to about $15,492,032 in today's funds). Todd married the former Bertha Freshman on February 14, 1927, and was the father of an infant son with no home for his family. Todd's subsequent business career was volatile, and failed ventures left him bankrupt many times.
    ellauri144.html on line 298: In June 1977, Avrom's remains were desecrated by graverobbers. The thieves broke into his casket looking for a $100,000 diamond ring, which, according to rumor, Taylor had placed on her husband's finger prior to his burial. The bag containing Avrom's remains was found under a tree near his burial plot. The bag and casket had been sealed in Albuquerque after Avrom's remains were identified following the 1958 crash. Avrom''s remains were once more identified through dental records and were reburied in a secret location.
    ellauri144.html on line 352: "The force that through the green fuse drives the flower" is a poem by Welsh poet Dylan Thomas— the poem that "made Thomas famous." Written in 1933 (when Thomas was nineteen), it was first published in his 1934 collection, 18 Poems.
    ellauri144.html on line 392: Dylan Marlais Thomas (27 October 1914 – 9 November 1953 = 39v) was a Welsh poet and writer whose works include the poems "Do not go gentle into that good night" (Josta suomenruozalainen leijakirjailija otti "Älä mene yxin yöllä ulos") and "And death shall have no dominion"; the "play for voices" Under Milk Wood; and stories and radio broadcasts such as A Child´s Christmas in Wales and Portrait of the Artist as a Young Dog. He became widely popular in his lifetime and remained so after his death at the age of 39 in New York City. By then he had acquired a reputation, which he had encouraged, as a "roistering, drunken and doomed poet".
    ellauri144.html on line 394: Dylan Thomas was born on 27 October 1914 in Swansea, the son of Florence Hannah (née Williams; 1882–1958), a seamstress, and David John Thomas (1876–1952), a teacher. His father had a first-class honours degree in English from University College, Aberystwyth and ambitions to rise above his position teaching English literature at the local grammar school, which he never did. Thomas had one sibling, Nancy Marles (1906–1953), who was eight years his senior. The children spoke only English, though their parents were bilingual in English and Welsh, and David Thomas gave Welsh lessons at home. Thomas´s father chose the name Dylan, which could be translated as "son of the sea", after Dylan ail Don, a character in The Mabinogion. (Mulla on se, mutten ole lukenut.) His middle name, Marlais, was given in honour of his great-uncle, William Thomas, a Unitarian minister and poet whose bardic name was Gwilym Marles. Se oli se silverbäk jota ne kaikki koittivat apinoida. Dylan, pronounced ˈ [ˈdəlan] (Dull-an) in Welsh, caused his mother to worry that he might be teased as the "dull one" (which he was). When he broadcast on Welsh BBC, early in his career, he was introduced using this pronunciation. Thomas favoured the Anglicised pronunciation and gave instructions that it should be Dillan /ˈdɪlən/. He was fed up with the "dull one" joke. in 1914. In 1931, when he was 16, Thomas, an undistinguished pupil, left school to become a reporter for the South Wales Daily Post, only to leave under pressure 18 months later.
    ellauri144.html on line 398: Thomas came to be appreciated as a popular poet during his lifetime, though he found earning a living as a writer was difficult. He began augmenting his income with reading tours and radio broadcasts. His radio recordings for the BBC during the late 1940s brought him to the public´s attention, and he was frequently used by the BBC as an accessible voice of the literary scene. Thomas first travelled to the United States in the 1950s. His readings there brought him a degree of fame, while his erratic behaviour and drinking worsened. His time in the United States cemented his legend, however, and he went on to record to vinyl such works as A Child´s Christmas in Wales. Phil Rothin ekalla tyttöystävällä oll Dylan Thomas-levy, jota ne kuuntelivat pukilla. During his fourth trip to New York in 1953, Thomas became gravely ill and fell into a coma. He died on 9 November 1953 and his body was returned to Wales. On 25 November 1953, he was interred at St Martin´s churchyard in Laugharne. What a laugh.
    ellauri144.html on line 400: His childhood featured regular summer trips to Llansteffan where his maternal relatives were the sixth generation to farm there. His mother´s family, the Williamses, lived in such farms as Waunfwlchan, Llwyngwyn, Maesgwyn and Penycoed.[17] The memory of Fernhill, a dairy farm owned by his maternal aunt, Ann Jones,[18] is evoked in the 1945 lyrical poem "Fern Hill". Thomas had bronchitis and asthma in childhood and struggled with these throughout his life. Thomas was indulged by his mother and enjoyed being mollycoddled, a trait he carried into adulthood, and he was skilful in gaining attention and sympathy. During his final school years he began writing poetry in notebooks; the first poem, dated 27 April (1930), is entitled "Osiris, come to Isis". In June 1928, Thomas won the school´s mile race, held at St. Helen´s Ground; he carried a newspaper photograph of his victory with him until his death.
    ellauri144.html on line 501: Rähisevää räppiä kuului taskuradiosta

    ellauri144.html on line 535: "Tahdon aina irti siitä mikä on vapauttanut mut, plus siistit kotiolot." "Is it me? IT IS me, Me ME ME ME! But IS IT?" This statement reflects Roth´s patent narcissism and determination to promote himself at any cost. Fellow juutikkaiden mielestä (esim rabbi Rackmann) Roth oli antisemiitti kun sen fiktiivinen kessu ei antanut jutkukaverille erikoiskohtelua. Phillu räkytti tästä Rackmannille vielä puoli vuosisataa myöhemmin. Kosto elää, vaikka jutku kuolisi. In 1959, Roth and Maggie (happily married) went to Italy for 6 mo on a Guggenheim. Phillu olis tahtonut koittaa shtuppimista 3 pekkaan kolmantena joku Marketta, mutta Maggipa ei suostunut.
    ellauri144.html on line 539: Maggin pojalle (josta tulee rekkakuski) se antaa lukemisexi kirjan The Red Badge of Courage. It is a war novel by American author Stephen Crane (1871–1900). Taking place during the American Civil War, the story is about a young private of the Union Army, Henry Fleming, who flees from the field of battle. Overcome with shame, he longs for a wound, a "red badge of courage," to counteract his cowardice. When his regiment once again faces the enemy, Henry acts as standard-bearer, who carries a flag.
    ellauri144.html on line 544: Ambrose Gwinnett Bierce (June 24, 1842 – circa 1914) was an American short story writer, journalist, poet, and Civil War veteran. His book The Devil´s Dictionary was named as one of "The 100 Greatest Masterpieces of American Literature" by the American Revolution Bicentennial Administration. His story "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" has been described as "one of the most famous and frequently anthologized stories in American literature", and his book Tales of Soldiers and Civilians (also published as In the Midst of Life) was named by the Grolier Club as one of the 100 most influential American books printed before 1900.
    ellauri144.html on line 546: A prolific and versatile writer, Bierce was regarded as one of the most influential journalists in the United States, and as a pioneering writer of realist fiction. For his horror writing, Michael Dirda ranked him alongside Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft. S. T. Joshi speculates that he may well be the greatest satirist America has ever produced, and in this regard can take his place with such figures as Juvenal, Swift, and Voltaire. His war stories influenced Stephen Crane, Ernest Hemingway, and others, and he was considered an influential and feared literary critic. In recent decades Bierce has gained wider respect as a fabulist and for his poetry.
    ellauri144.html on line 548: Both of Bierce´s sons died before he did. Day committed suicide after a romantic rejection (he non-fatally shot the woman of his affections along with her fiancé beforehand), and Leigh died of pneumonia related to alcoholism. Bierce separated from his wife in 1888, after discovering compromising letters to her from an admirer. They divorced in 1904. Mollie Day Bierce died the following year. Bierce was an avowed agnostic, and strongly rejected the divinity of Christ. He suffered from lifelong asthma, as well as complications from his war wounds, most notably episodes of fainting and irritability assignable to the traumatic brain injury suffered at Kennesaw Mountain. In 1913, Bierce told reporters that he was travelling to Mexico to gain first-hand experience of the Mexican Revolution. He disappeared and was never seen again.
    ellauri144.html on line 552: Like Poe, Bierce professed to be mainly concerned with the artistry of his work, yet critics find him more intent on conveying his misanthropy and pessimism. His bare, economical style of supernatural horror is usually distinguished from the verbally lavish tales of Poe. In his lifetime, Bierce was famous as a California journalist dedicated to exposing the truth as he understood it, regardless of whose reputations were harmed by his attacks. For his sardonic wit and damning observations on the personalities and events of the day, he became known as "the wickedest man in San Francisco." Tälläisiä löytyy Ambrosen pirun raamatusta:
    ellauri144.html on line 580: Patriotism. Combustible rubbish ready to the torch of any one ambitious to illuminate his name.
    ellauri144.html on line 596: Bitter Bierceä haukuttiin aikanaan naturalistixi. Silloin tarkoitettiin varmaan Emile Zolan "pahaa" naturalismia, johon kuului tieteisusko ja determinismi, eikä Norrisin hampaatonta amerikkalaista "naturalismia", joka oli potpurri realismista ja romantiikasta. Zola´s concept of a naturalistic novel traces philosophically to Auguste Comte´s positivism, but also to physiologist Claude Bernard and historian Hippolyte Taine. Hippolyte on jo esiintynyt näissä paasauxissa, kai Akukin on saanut jotain mainintoja. Claude on toistaisexi n.h. (never heard).
    ellauri144.html on line 650: Raffalovich was a 19th century Hebrew Catholic or Catholic Jew. His name was Marc-Andre Raffalovich and was a famous French poet and writer associated with John Gray and Oscar Wilde. He came from a wealthy Russian Jewish family from Odessa who moved to France a year before his birth. He became a Catholic in 1896 through the reading of Catholic mystical literature especially homahtava St John of the Cross. Ei ois kannattanut. For
    ellauri144.html on line 651: the Catholic Catechism of the Catholic church
    ellauri144.html on line 680:

    Silverfish credo is technology. It makes his life better. Absolutely go for it. Retaperse äänessä.

    ellauri144.html on line 691: Mark Zuckerberg in MBTI? Other websites have him as either a INTP or INTJ. I’m going with INTJ, he was an early achiever, while INTPs can often be late bloomers, this is due to the late development of the Judging function. INTJs also tend to be more focused, serious, follow traditions and rules. While the types have many similarities, INTJ seems to be the closer match. Väpelö hörhö nörtti kimmo. Propellipää - luovaa kirpunnyljentää. Sitäpä sitä. Saatanan jutku. Metatron meni neuvomaan Aabrahamille miten Iisakki olis paras uhrata. Viime minuutilla tuli peruutus: kyllä mulle tänään oikeastaan maistuiskin paremmin toi syntipukki. Lisäohjeita albumissa 115.
    ellauri144.html on line 698: When Allura learns that Max, who was her rival for the directorship, is to marry Lana, Allura’s little sister, she swears revenge. Max’s confidence is shaken, and on his next all-night shift at the station, an accident causes the meltdown of one of the reactors. In the ensuing catastrophe, the region and its people are poisoned, and the survivors are forced to evacuate their beloved town.
    ellauri144.html on line 700: Months later, Max is summoned to headquarters by Party officials and learns that he can save his career only if he brings Allura the trophy head of a rare white stag. Interweaving through the human actions, the region’s Silver River and its animals have their say."
    ellauri144.html on line 837: Platero kaj mi (Platero y yo) estas proza lirika verko de 1914 de la hispana poeto Juan Ramón Jiménez, kiu rekreas poezie la vivon de la azeno Platero, kvankam certe la verkisto havis diversajn azenetojn. La libro estas konstituita de mallongaj bild-epizodoj kiuj inter si ne trudas teman aŭ intrigan ordon kaj prezentas nur impresojn, sensaciojn kaj rememorojn de Moguer (Sudokcidenta Andaluzio) el infana kaj juna epokoj de Juan Ramón Jiménez mem. La verko aspektas taglibro en kiu oni detaligas la plej gravajn aspektojn de la realo, de la pensaro kaj de la sentoj de la verkisto. Tamen, ĝi estas nek taglibro nek membiografio, sed nur elekto de historioj el reala medio kaj inter multaj memoroj de la pasinteco.
    ellauri144.html on line 942: Etter at Olav var flyktet til Gardariket sier Snorre Sturlasson at grunnen til at nordmennene reiste seg mot kongen var at «de ikke tålte hans rettferdighet» da han straffet rike likt med fattige. Denne rettferdiggjøringen av Olavs styre er ikke historisk korrekt, like lite som konstruksjonene om trolldom og de senere påståtte mirakler er det.
    ellauri145.html on line 70: André Breton est né le 19 février 1896 à Tinchebray en Normandie, où il passe ses quatre premières années. Fils unique de Louis-Justin Breton, gendarme né dans les Vosges, il est issu de la petite bourgeoisie catholique dont la mère impose une éducation rigide, il passe une enfance sans histoire à Pantin (Seine-St-Denis3), dans la banlieue nord-est de Paris.
    ellauri145.html on line 81: Apres un autre manifeste contre le Stalinisme avec Camus, Gide, Hemingway et Huxley, il cosigne dans Le Libertaire une « Déclaration préalable » au manifeste « Surréalisme et anarchisme » : « La lutte pour le remplacement des structures sociales et l’activité déployée par le surréalisme pour transformer les structures mentales, loin de s’exclure, sont complémentaires. Leur jonction doit hâter la venue d’un âge libéré de toute hiérarchie et toute contrainte. »
    ellauri145.html on line 104: Juhani Ihanus, FT (s. 8. toukokuuta 1954 Helsinki) on kulttuuripsykologian dosentti Helsingin yliopistossa, taidekasvatuksen ja taidepsykologian dosentti Aalto-yliopistossa sekä aate- ja oppihistorian dosentti Oulun yliopistossa. Hän on toiminut Helsingin yliopistossa vuodesta 1982 lähtien useissa opettaja- ja tutkijatehtävissä. Nähtävästi elinkautinen keskinkertaisuus kuten Lichtenberg. Ihanus on eurooppalaisen kirjallisuusterapian pioneereja. „Unsere Erde ist vielleicht ein Weibchen.“ „Wir fressen einander nicht, wir schlachten uns bloß.“ „Der Amerikaner, der den Kolumbus zuerst entdeckte, machte eine böse Entdeckung.“ Ihan näppäriä, muttei näillä kuuhun mennä. Silti Goethe kehui Joria taikasauvaxi, Kant alleviivas punasella sen kaikki töräyxet, ja Koala-vaari piti sitä izenäisenä ajattelijana. Tolstoinkin mielestä Lichtenberg oli parempi töräyttelijä kuin koketti följetongisti Nietzsche. Georg oli pedofiili, alkoi shtuppia 12-vuotiasta tyttöä v. 1777. Ikävä kyllä Lolita kuoli (varmaan johkin sexitautiin) 5 vuotta myöhemmin. Jostain syystä Jori digas Jacob Böhmeä. Ällöttävä Max Ernst piti Joria verrattomana huromistina. Seuraavasta penseestä mä voisin ottaa opixeni: Le degré le plus haut jusqu´où puisse s´élever un esprit mediocre, mais pourvu d´expérience, c´est le talent de decouvrir les faiblesses des hommes qui valent mieux que lui. Tässä ei ollut mitään hahatettavaa, vaikka tikulla olis kaivanut.
    ellauri145.html on line 110: As a traveling salesman and correspondence clerk, his research and thought was time-limited: he complained of "serving the knavery of merchants" and the stupefaction of "deceitful and degrading duties." Fourier produced most of his writings between 1816 and 1821. In 1822, he tried to sell his books again but with no success. Jobs people might not enjoy doing would receive higher pay. Fourier considered trade, which he associated with Jews, to be the "source of all evil" and advocated that Jews be forced to perform farm work in the phalansteries or else sent back to The Philistines with Rotschild money. Fourier´s contempt for the respectable thinkers and ideologies of his age was so intense that he always used the terms philosopher and civilization in a pejorative sense.


    ellauri145.html on line 117: Thomas De Quincey: On Murder Considered as one of the Fine Arts Thomas Penson De Quincey (/də ˈkwɪnsi/;[1] 15 August 1785 – 8 December 1859) was an English writer, essayist, and literary critic, best known for his Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821) Many scholars suggest that in publishing this work De Quincey inaugurated the tradition of addiction literature in the West. Mulla on toi kirja, mä luinkin sen, mutta se oli kyllä aika pitkästyttävä. Tämänkertainen ozikko tuo mieleen sen usein mietityttäneen havainnon että mixhän vitussa 50% tv-sarjoista on murhajuttuja. Eikai siinä muuta ole kun että KILL! on 1/3 apinan mieliharrastuxista. Dekkarit ja horrorit on musta lattapäisyyden selvimpiä ilmentymiä.
    ellauri145.html on line 190: "Ring de pell ;" he replied, attempting a grin with his little villainous mouth.
    ellauri145.html on line 192: Upon this I made an effort to get up, in order to put my threat into execution; but the ruffian just reached across the table very deliberately, and hitting me a tap on the forehead with the neck of one of the long bottles, knocked me back into the arm-chair from which I had half arisen. I was utterly astounded; and, for a moment, was quite at a loss what to do. In the meantime, he continued his talk.
    ellauri145.html on line 233: Dandy endetté, Baudelaire est placé sous tutelle judiciaire et mène dès 1842 une vie dissolue. Il commence alors à composer plusieurs poèmes des Fleurs du mal. Critique d´art et journaliste, il défend Delacroix comme représentant du romantisme en peinture, mais aussi Balzac lorsque l´auteur de La Comédie humaine est attaqué et caricaturé pour sa passion des chiffres ou sa perversité présumée. En 1843, il découvre les « paradis artificiels » dans le grenier de l´appartement familial de son ami Louis Ménard, où il goûte à la confiture verte. Même s´il contracte une colique à cette occasion, cette expérience semble décupler sa créativité (il dessine son autoportrait en pied, très démesuré) et renouvellera cette expérience occasionnellement sous contrôle médical, en participant aux réunions du « club des Haschischins ». En revanche, son usage de l´opium est plus long : il fait d´abord, dès 1847, un usage thérapeutique du laudanum17, prescrit pour combattre des maux de tête et des douleurs intestinales consécutives à une syphilis, probablement contractée vers 1840 durant sa relation avec la prostituée Sarah la Louchette. Comme De Quincey avant lui, l´accoutumance lui dicte d´augmenter progressivement les doses. Croyant ainsi y trouver un adjuvant créatif, il en décrira les enchantements et les tortures.
    ellauri145.html on line 257: Anterosta paras jäynä oli kun Charlie oli ikävystynyt ja kuzui yläkertaan lasimestarin hankalasta portaikosta lasiruutuineen, sitten haukkui sen kun sillä ei ollut köyhissä kortteleissa kaupan värilaseja, joiden läpi elämä näyttäs ruusuiselta köyhille. Ja kun lasimestari oli lähdössä pihasta, se vielä heitti sen lasikuormaa kukkaruukulla, niin että kaikki ruudut särkyivät. "Kyllähän tällänen voi tulla kalliixi, mutta mitä hinnasta, kun saa tuntea tällästä puhdasta riemua." Voi pannahinen, täytyy sanoa kuin Kit Carson. Vitun spedet.
    ellauri145.html on line 285: D'humeur dépressive, l'auteur des Fleurs du mal effectue plusieurs tentatives de suicide. Son état psychique l'inspire artistiquement. Il s'y complaît même, non sans masochisme. Mais son spleen s'inscrit toujours dans sa quête de l'idéal, auquel il accède parfois grâce à de secrètes correspondances.
    ellauri145.html on line 341: Qu’un granit entouré d’une vague épouvante, Jota aallon ympäröimä kivi kauhistaa,
    ellauri145.html on line 404: Roger Tichborne, heir to the noble and filthy rich Tichborne family´s title and fortunes, was presumed to have died in a shipwreck in 1854 at age 25. His mother clung to a belief that he might have survived, and after hearing rumours that he had made his way to Australia, she advertised extensively in Australian newspapers, offering a reward for information. In 1866, a Wagga Wagga butcher known as Thomas Castro came forward claiming to be Roger Tichborne. Although his manners and bearing were unrefined, he gathered support and travelled to England. He was instantly accepted by Lady Tichborne as her son, although other family members were dismissive and sought to expose him as an impostor. During protracted enquiries before the case went to court in 1871, details emerged suggesting that the claimant might be Arthur Orton, a butcher´s son from Wapping in London, who had gone to sea as a boy and had last been heard of in Australia. After a civil court had rejected the claimant´s case, he was charged with perjury; while awaiting trial he campaigned throughout the country to gain popular support. In 1874, a criminal court jury decided that he was not Roger Tichborne and declared him to be Arthur Orton. Before passing a sentence of 14 years, the judge condemned the behaviour of the claimant´s counsel, Edward Kenealy, who was subsequently disbarred because of his conduct.
    ellauri145.html on line 406: After the trial, Kenealy instigated a popular radical reform movement, the Magna Charta Association, which championed the claimant´s cause for some years. Kenealy was elected to Parliament in 1875 as a radical independent but was not an effective parliamentarian. The movement was in decline when the claimant was released in 1884, and he had no dealings with it. In 1895, he confessed to being Orton, only to recant almost immediately. He lived generally in poverty for the rest of his life and was destitute at the time of his death in 1898. Although most commentators have accepted the court´s view that the claimant was Orton, some analysts believe that an element of doubt remains as to his true identity and that, conceivably, he was Roger Tichborne. Or not.
    ellauri145.html on line 490: J’ai composé cette histoire ? simple, simple, simple, Kexin tämän jutun ? simppelin 3x
    ellauri145.html on line 504: Q: Why is Nietzsche so misunderstood? Even his own mom didn´t get him..
    ellauri145.html on line 512: Friedrich Nietzsche, Karl Marx and Charles Darwin are the great triumvirate of 19th-century thinkers whose ideas still have huge impact today. Nietzsche was philosophy’s supreme iconoclast; his sayings include “God is dead” and “There are no facts, only interpretations”. Highly relevant, yet his association with concepts such as the Übermensch, master morality, slave morality and, possibly most dangerous, the will to power, have also contributed to him being widely misinterpreted. There are three myths in particular that need dynamiting: that his politics were on the far right, he was a misogynist and he lacked a sense of humour. Of a sort.
    ellauri145.html on line 515: I had no idea Nietzsche could be funny until I read his letters. “The gentlest, most reasonable man may, if he wears a large moustache, sit as it were in its shade and feel safe,” he wrote, self-mockingly. “As the accessory of a large moustache he will give the impression of being military, irascible and sometimes violent – and will be treated accordingly.” More fun wisecracks:
    ellauri145.html on line 516: Condemned by ill health and abysmal eyesight to convey his philosophy in short, aphoristic bursts, Nietzsche knew the power of raising a bubble of laughter, only to puncture it as you ponder the further meaning: “Is man God’s mistake, or is God man’s mistake?” “Man does not strive for happiness; only the Englishman does that” – a dig at Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. “Possession usually diminishes the possession.” “Never trust a thought that occurs to you indoors.” He even makes fun of his readers: “The worst readers are those who behave like plundering troops: they take away a few things they can use, dirty and confound the remainder, and revile the whole.” Vittu miten säälittäviä on yrityxet osoittaa että jyrkät tyypit olis jotenkin humoristisia. Ei ne vaan ole.
    ellauri145.html on line 519: His sister Elisabeth held fascist views. She published an unreliable biography of him and delayed publication of his autobiography, Ecce Homo, until she had deleted all the uncomplimentary references to herself.
    ellauri145.html on line 522: We have to bestow blame on one particular Nazi named Martin Heidegger. Martin Heidegger’s magnum opus Being and Time was in large part an attempt to create a systematic understanding of metaphysics and human condition building from Nietzsche’s work. Heidegger became the Nazi rector for the entire German university system, which gave the Nazi party a huge bolster of academic legitimacy, and he promoted the Nazi party and their agenda from his classroom, often sporting the Brown Shirt. When the Nazi’s really began to take power, Hitler kicked out Heidegger as University Rector.
    ellauri145.html on line 524: Following the war, academics who had supported the Nazi regime were banned from teaching, including Heidegger, who never spoke publicly or privately about his involvement. Heidegger turned away from his earlier project of creating a fundamental ontology, and in doing so he also turned away from Nietzsche - or so his writings would make it appear. In truth, he remained just as indebted to Nietzsche’s work as he ever was, only he shifted focus. He created a false presentation of Nietzsche’s work in order to distance himself from his own past and involvement with the Nazis. Many academics take Heidegger’s critique of Nietzsche to be factual and seem to excuse Heidegger because he was under the influence of Nietzsche.
    ellauri145.html on line 526: Heidegger’s analysis of Nietzsche is entirely inauthentic. He alleges that Nietzsche merges a metaphysics of force with a Marxist analysis of labor to create a technological metaphysics of domination - however, Nietzsche’s analysis of force was completely counter to Marx’s and the marriage of Nietzsche and Marx is not Nietzsche, but is rather National Socialism, and the philosophical framework of this marriage is none other than Being and Time.
    ellauri145.html on line 528: Heidegger purposefully misrepresented the teachings of Nietzsche in order to distance himself from his own past, and this analysis has stood for some time as the authoritative reading of Nietzsche. This reading is slowly being undone by Nietzsche scholars, but slowly because many scholars refuse to amend the inauthentic reading they have inherited.
    ellauri145.html on line 535: Intellectuals very often have an image the same way rock stars and movie directors do. There’s the real person, and there’s the body of work they create, and then there’s the image, the popular conception of that person. Most people don’t understand theoretical physics and are not interested in learning the math to do so, and most people probably wouldn’t understand anything in the papers that Hawking has authored or co-authored. But most of us know who Hawking was, not only because he wrote popular books but because he was paralyzed and sat in a wheelchair and had a robot voice. The idea of a theoretical physicist who does all his work with his brain even though his body is destroyed and speaks through a machine is almost like a comic book character, and the popular imagination loves that.
    ellauri145.html on line 537: Nietzsche’s image, through no more fault of his own than Hawking´s (LOL), has grown in a similar way to that of Hawking. We all have a vague notion of what the Ubermensch is, we’ve all heard “God is dead,” and we all know Nietzsche was a crazy philosopher with a giant mustache who wrote really hard books and scared his contemporaries and was apparently a favorite of the Nazis. There are little quips and quotes from him around the internet that sound awfully cryptic and enigmatic. And the publishing industry plays on this image, too: I have a copy of Beyond Good And Evil with a black cover and the title text printed in red and white, and the color scheme looks a little sinister. I strongly suspect that, if Nietzsche did not have a popular image as a crazy nihilist Nazi Ubermensch from the 1800s, the publisher would not have made the decision to print his books with a black and red color scheme. A cursory look at Amazon’s book listing also shows copies of Thus Spake Zarathustra with a picture of a panther’s eyes on the cover, glowering at the reader. Because… “Nietzsche was that crazy German writer or philosopher or whatever, right? And he was, like, an anarchist or nihilist or Nazi or something, right? Didn’t he kill God or something like that? Yeah.”
    ellauri145.html on line 539: What rebellious teenager could resist this kind of thing? You’ve got your long hair, your leather jacket, your Slayer albums and your combat boots. You’ve got a guitar you can almost play. What completes that ensemble better than a copy of “The Antichrist,” placed conspicuously on your book stand? It’ll scare your parents if they’re religious, it’ll freak out your friends, and maybe you can find a sentence that sounds profound and memorize it so you can win some points for being deep. Get an inch or two deeper between her legs.
    ellauri145.html on line 541: Now, this is perhaps not quite fair to all the teenagers who read Nietzsche. Some of them may actually understand him, at least partially, including the long-haired leather jacket-wearing ones. And there really is a little blood and thunder in Nietzsche’s philosophy, a little punk rock. Regardless, the popular image is probably a bigger driver for book sales of Nietzsche’s work than anything he actually said or any point he actually made.
    ellauri145.html on line 545: The answer to this is very simple. Utilitarianism is concerned only with the volume of pleasure and pain, and Nietzsche says in so many words that as soon as you even enter into this kind of thinking, you are already deep into the territory of nihilism. It is passive; concerned with high maintenance, not constructivism; aloof or indifferent to meaning, something to justify the effort in the first place, even when it is successful, let alone when it isn’t. It is the staid, kindly, sober—not to say, the British—version of the same imbecilic nihilism that was prevailing on the continent in the same era. Mill did not understand the difference between pleasure and (counterfactual) happiness, between pain and suffering, between real (spiritual) slavery and freedom. Eli koska se oli säälittävä mursuwiixinen luuseri.
    ellauri145.html on line 551: Although there is certainly a bias toward “masculinity” in Nietzsche’s works, this does not necessarily mean what it is presumed to mean. “Masculinity” is not, for instance a code word for “male”. It does not apply as a broad category to those who have a certain set of genitals. In fact what the term means is having the sort of virtues that one might have typically related to the masculine virtues that were considered admirable at various times in the past. These include courage, transcendence of petty emotional concerns, fearlessness in the face of death, and so on. Intellectual courage was a particular attribute that Nietzsche was trying to encourage in his readers though his appeal to the term, “masculinity”.
    ellauri145.html on line 568: Is it possible that philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche faked his own madness for personal reasons that we may never know?
    ellauri145.html on line 580: Why do people tend to have such a low opinion of Friedrich Nietzsche and his philosophy?
    ellauri145.html on line 591: Ehkä oireellisesti, Anteron miälestä Nietzschen hauskin pläjäys oli tää sen viimeinen Wahnsinnszettel. Retun siirtymät murentumisesta (Zerrüttung) luhistumiseen (Zusammenbruch) ja sammahtamiseen (Umnachtung) olivat lyhyitä.
    ellauri145.html on line 600: Astu.10 Epämukavaa ja vaatimattomuuttani hiertävää on se, että minä olen perimmältään jokainen historian nimi.
    ellauri145.html on line 601: Maailmaan laittamistani lapsistakin puntaroin koko lailla epäröiden, josko kaikki ”Jumalan valtakuntaan” tulevat myös tulevat Jumalasta11. Tänä syksynä menin mahdollisimman vähissä vaatteissa kahdesti omiin hautajaisiini, ensin kreivi Robilantina (ei – hän on poikani, siinä missä minä olen luontoni pohjalta Carlo Alberto), mutta minä itse olin Antonelli12. Rakas herra professori, teidän pitäisi nähdä tämä rakennelma13. Koska olen täysin kokematon seikoissa, jotka luon, teille kuulukoon kaikki kritiikki, olen kiitollinen voimatta luvata hyötyväni. Me artistit olemme opettamattomissa. – Tänään katselin – henkevänmaurilaista – operettiani, tyydytyksekseni totesin tässäkin tilaisuudessa, että nyt ovat Moskova yhtä hyvin kuin Roomakin grandiööseja asioita14. Ymmärrättehän, maisemaakaan varten ei minulta puutu lahjakkuutta.
    ellauri145.html on line 618: Kriittisen teoslaitoksen toimittaja, italialaisfilosof i Giorgio Culli (1917–1979), huomautti, että ”todella patologisia tekstejä” syntyi vähän: ”Lähes samaan aikaan kun Nietzsche menetti järkensä, hän myös lakkasi olemasta litteraatti.” Siirtymät murentumisesta (Zerrüttung) luhistumiseen (Zusammenbruch) ja sammahtamiseen (Umnachtung) olivat lyhyitä.
    ellauri145.html on line 620: 2 Liikkuvaa elämää 1870-luvun puolivälistä alkaen viettänyt Nietzsche oli saapunut Torinoon syyskuussa 1888 vietettyään siellä jo pari kuukautta samana keväänä. Hän pysyi kaupungissa aina tammikuuhun 1889 saakka. Läheisin ystävä, Baselin yliopistossa uustestamentillisen eksegetiikan ja varhaisen kirkkohistorian professorina 1870–1997 toiminut Franz Overbeck (1837–1905) saapui Torinoon 7. päivänä ja saattoi Nietzschen 9.:nä baselilaiselle klinikalle. Potilas siirrettiin Jenan yliopistosairaalaan 17. tammikuuta ja edelleen kotihoitoon Naumburgiin äitinsä Franziskan (1826–1897) luo maaliskuussa 1889. Saman vuoden joulukuussa hoitovastuun otti hänen siskonsa Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche (1846–1935), joka siirsi potilaan kesällä 1897 Weimariin. Nietzschen äärimmäinen työrupeama – vuoden 1888 aikana laaditut kuusi teosta, kasa kirjeitä ja valtavasti muistiinpanoja – vaikutti mitä ilmeisimmin terveyden romahtamiseen uutenavuotena. Hulluksi tulemisen tavoista ja ajoituksista riittää teorioita, ja sen lääketieteellisistä syistä kiistellään (tavallisimmin neurosyfilis–aivokasvain-akselilla), mutta joka tapauksessa nopeasti dementoitunut Nietzsche ei enää toipunut viestimiskykyiseksi tammikuun alun 1889 jälkeen. Tässä käännetty kirje, viimeinen hulluusviesti, lähetettiin 5.
    ellauri145.html on line 623: 3 Kirje on osoitettu kotikaupunkinsa Baselin yliopistossa historian ja taidehistorian professorina 1858–1893 vaikuttaneelle Jacob Burckhardtille (1818–1897), johon Nietzsche oli tutustunut toimittuaan Baselissa klassisen fi lologian professorina 1869–1879. Burckhardt antoi kirjeen Overbeckille, joka tajusi heti asioiden olevan huonosti.
    ellauri145.html on line 626: Pariisilaisten pasaasien malliin rakennettu Galleria Subalpina (1874) on loistelias kujien ja patioiden leimaama ostospalatsi Torinon historiallisessa ytimessä Piazza Castellolla, kahden korttelin päässä Carignanon aukiolta. Torinolaissyntyisestä Vittorio di Savoiasta (1820–1878), Carignanon seitsemännestä ruhtinaasta, tuli Sardinia(-Piemonte)n kuningas Vittorio Emanuele II (1849–1861), kunnes hän julistautui yhdistyneen Italian ensimmäiseksi kuninkaaksi (1861–1878).
    ellauri145.html on line 678: Les Chants de Mal Odor. Ce sont un ouvrage poétique en prose de 1869, composé de six parties nommées « chants ». Il s´agit de la première des trois œuvres de l´auteur Isidore Ducasse plus connu sous le pseudonyme de comte de Lautréamont. Le livre ne raconte pas une histoire unique et cohérente, mais est constitué d´une suite d´épisodes dont le seul fil conducteur est la présence de Maldoror, un personnage mystérieux et maléfique. The misanthropic, misotheistic character Maldoror is a figure of evil who has renounced conventional morality. Tulee tosta mieleen että Figura-liivejä mainostettiin ennen lehdissä.
    ellauri145.html on line 688: Joris-Karl Huysmans on Anteron seuraava potilas. Charles-Marie-Georges Huysmans (5. helmikuuta 1848 Pariisi, Ranska – 12. toukokuuta 1907 Pariisi, Ranska) oli pukinpartainen flaamilaissyntyinen ranskalainen kirjailija ja taidekriitikko, jonka ensimmäiset romaanit olivat naturalistisia. Hänestä tuli kuitenkin pian dekadentti. Hän oli myös arvostettua kirjallisuuspalkintoa jakavan Goncourt-akatemian ensimmäinen johtaja Huysmans oli ranskalaisen äidin ja alankomaalaisen isän ainoa poika. Hän aloitti 20-vuotiaana pitkän uran Ranskan sisäministeriössä. Useimmat romaaninsa hän kirjoitti virka-aikana työpaikalta varastamalleen kirjepaperille. Ranskalaisillahan ei ole töissä muuta kuin luppoaikaa, kuten selviää amerikkalaisten tekemässä ranskisklisheekokoelmassa nimelltä Emily in Paris. Se on mikäli mahdollista vielä kehnompi kuin Jorin romaanit. Huysmansin varhaisimmat teokset saivat vaikutteita naturalisteilta. Niihin kuuluvat muun muassa romaani Marthe, histoire d’une fille (1876) ja pienoisromaani Sac au dos (1880), joka perustui Huysmansin omiin kokemuksiin Saksan–Ranskan sodasta.
    ellauri145.html on line 697: 1890, while composing Là-bas, Huysmans was thoroughly fed up with both Zola and Naturalism. He wanted his novel to be “le dernier décarcassement de cette butte croulante qu’on nomme le naturalisme!” (24 July 1890, letter 99:200). Luhistuva kuoppa. Tarkoitti takuulla peräreikää. Hullua, sehän niitä nimenomaan kiinnosti.
    ellauri145.html on line 699: Là-bas did strike a serious blow to the public’s conception of Naturalism. The novel, which opens with a two-page invective against Naturalism, was serialized in L’Echo de Paris, beginning on February 16, 1891. Huysmans’s protagonist, Durtal, feebly defends himself against his friend, Des Hermies, who maligns Naturalism as “du cloportisme” (siiramaisuudesta) while accusing it of having sold out: “Il a vanté l’américanisme nouveau des moeurs, abouti à l’éloge de la force brutale, à l’apothéose du coffre-fort. Par un prodige d’humilité, il a révéré le goût nauséeux des foules, et, par cela même, il a répudié le style, rejeté toute pensée altière, tout élan vers le surnaturel et l’au-delà...” (XII, 1, 6-7).
    ellauri145.html on line 701: Des Hermies leaves, and Durtal, a former Naturalist, weighs his friend’s criticism. Although he is fed up with the positivism and commercialism of Naturalism, he cannot envision a novel without its research, realistic details, and style. He hypothesizes about what could be done and concludes that Naturalism must change, it must broaden its horizons:
    ellauri145.html on line 707: Durtal admires the documentation of Naturalism, yet wants to open it to the supernatural, to an exploration of both body and spirit: it will be a kind of “naturalisme spiritualiste” that will follow Zola’s route, but in the air.6 This tension between realism and the supernatural lies at the heart of Là-bas, a novel in which Huysmans follows Durtal’s spiritual transformation as he researches medieval and modern Satanism. Là-bas was a scandalous best-seller. It inspired a great deal of public debate, especially since it was published in the same review and at the same time as Jules Huret’s first Enquête sur l’évolution littéraire, a series of sixty-four interviews conducted with major French authors from March 3 to July 5, 1891.7 This series, which asked its interviewees whether Naturalism was dead, was a phenomenal success read by all of Paris.8 Huret caused every non-Naturalist writer to agree that Zola’s brand of Naturalism was obsolete because it neglected humanity’s soul.
    ellauri145.html on line 709: When Zola was interviewed for this series on March 31, one month after Là-bas had begun to appear, even he admitted that it was possible that Naturalism was drawing to a close: “C’est possible. Nous avons tenu un gros morceau du siècle, nous n’avons pas à nous plaindre; et nous représentons un moment assez splendide dans l’évolution des idées au dix-neuvième siècle pour ne pas craindre d’envisager l’avenir” (XII, 653).
    ellauri145.html on line 715: Toinen pieni harmin aihe on se, että johdannossa ja selityksissä ei tuoda esille des Esseintesin historiallista esikuvaa, kreivi Robert de Montesquiou-Fenzensacia (1855-1921), joka on toiminut esikuvana myös Marcel Proustin Kadonnutta aikaa etsimässä -teossarjan paroni du Charlusille. Eli n:nnen kerran: des Esseintes on se sama homo dändi Montesquiou, joka Charlusina Proustin kirjassa bylsi liiveissä jotain palvelijaa porttikongissa pyllyvakoon, Proustin tirkistellessä hikisenä muna kädessä.
    ellauri145.html on line 723: Édouard-Joachim Corbière (18 July 1845 – 1 March 1875) was a French poet born in Coat-Congar, Ploujean (now part of Morlaix) in Brittany, where he lived most of his life before dying of tuberculosis at the age of 29. Helmin ikäisenä. Profiilikuvassa sillä on aivan jättimäinen baskeri, lökäpöxyt ja kumiteräsaappaat.
    ellauri145.html on line 725: His mother Marie-Angélique-Aspasie Puyo, 19 years old at the time of his birth, belonged to one of the most prominent families of the local bourgeoisie. His father was Antoine-Édouard Corbière, known for his best-selling novel Le Négrier. A cousin, Constant Puyo, was a well-known Pictorialist photographer.
    ellauri145.html on line 727: During his schooling at the Imperial Lycée of Saint-Brieuc where he studied from 1858 until 1860, he fell prey to a deep depression, and, over several freezing winters, contracted the severe rheumatism which was to disfigure him severely. He blamed his parents for having placed him there, far from his family´s care and affection. Difficulties in adapting to the harsh discipline of the college´s noble débris (distinguished relics, i.e., teachers) gradually developed those characteristics of anarchic disdain and sarcasm which were to give much of his verse its distinctive voice.
    ellauri145.html on line 729: Corbière´s only published verse in his lifetime appeared in Les amours jaunes, 1873, a volume that went almost unnoticed until Paul Verlaine included him in his gallery of poètes maudits (accursed poets). Thereafter Verlaine´s recommendation was enough to establish him as one of the masters acknowledged by the Symbolists, and he was subsequently rediscovered and treated as a predecessor by the surrealists.
    ellauri145.html on line 731: Close-packed, linked to the ocean and his Breton roots, and tinged with disdain for Romantic sentimentalism, his work is also characterised by its idiomatic play and exceptional modernity. He was praised by both Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot (whose work he had a great influence on). Many subsequent modernist poets have also studied him, and he has often been translated into English.
    ellauri145.html on line 1059: This paper offers a detailed reading of Rimbaud´ s "obscure" prose pom "Dévotion" from the Illuminations. The reading is based on the central principle that the text is modelled on the form of devotional prayer, a model that Rimbaud adopts only to parody it and transgress against it. Kaikki lukijat on yhtä mieltä että tää on Rimbaudin sepustuxista sekopäisin. Vaik kyllä se aina varoo olemasta selväsanainen, se on epädekadenttia. R. is extremely fond of mystifying his readers.
    ellauri145.html on line 1130: Jusqu´à l´âge de trois ans, il ne prononce pas un mot, sa famille le croyait muet. À l´école, il semble plutôt se destiner à une carrière scientifique : il passe à seize ans son baccalauréat en sciences. Recalé à cause des oraux d´histoire et de géographie, il est finalement reçu l´année suivante. Il devient alors stagiaire dans la pharmacie de son père qui ambitionne pour lui une succession tranquille, mais qui goûte peu ses expériences et ses faux médicaments et l´envoie étudier à Paris. En fait d´études, Alphonse préfère passer son temps aux terrasses des cafés ou dans le jardin du Luxembourg, et ne se présente pas à l´un des examens de l´école de pharmacie. Son père, s´apercevant que les fréquentations extra-estudiantines de son fils ont pris le pas sur ses études, décide de lui couper les vivres.
    ellauri145.html on line 1162: In 1871, he published La natation ou l’art de nager appris seul en moins d’une heure (Learning the art of swimming alone in less than an hour), then resigned from the Army and moved to Marseilles. Here he filed a patent for the "airlift swimming trunks and belt with a double compensatory reservoir". This commercial endeavor was a complete failure. He returned to Magdeburg, where he earned his living as a language teacher, developing a method for learning French, which he self-published in 1874.
    ellauri145.html on line 1164: Brisset became stationmaster at the railway station of Angers, and later of L´Aigle. After publishing another book on the French language, he undertook his major philosophical work, in which contended that humans were descended from frogs. Brisset supported his contention by comparing the French and frog languages (such as "logement" = dwelling, comes from "l'eau" = water). He was serious about his "morosophy", and authored a number of books and pamphlets put forth his indisputable substantiations, which he had printed and distributed at his own expense.
    ellauri145.html on line 1166: In 1912, novelist Jules Romains, who had obtained copies of God´s Mystery and The Human Origins, set up, with the help of fellow hoaxers, a rigged election for a "Prince of Thinkers". Unsurprisingly, Brisset got elected. The Election Committee then called Brisset to Paris in 1913, where he was received and acclaimed with great pomp. He partook in several ceremonies and a banquet and uttered emotional words of thanks for this unexpected late recognition of his work. Newspapers exposed the hoax the next day.
    ellauri145.html on line 1235: Näinpä oudon unen tai sarjan niitä. Yhdessä osassa oltiin koko perheisesti Kanarian matkalla Lofoottien sijasta. Seuraavassa osassa oli pahoja moukkia keskustalaisia Kouvolassa tai Sysmässä, jotka yritti myydä meille kunnan saunatiloja lahjonnan ja äänenkalastuxen ehdoilla. Olis pitänyt kustantaa uudet housut keskustaäijälle. Sitten siinä oli oudot keskustaoikeiston aikuisten kesäjuhlat joissa Ympyräsuu ja/tai Jill räväytti tanssahtelemalla pöydällä ilman vaatteita. Sitten etelänmatka jatkui pimenevässä illassa keekoilevat kesäsysmäläiset mukana. Meillä piti olla juhlan jälkeen Airbnb huone jossain tornihotellissa vuokrattuna mutta olin hukannut sen avaimen. Seija rähisi. Siihen uni päättyi.
    ellauri146.html on line 46: Christian Dietrich Grabbe (* 11. Dezember 1801 in Detmold; † 12. September 1836 ebenda) war ein deutscher Dramatiker des Vormärz. Der Begriff Vormärz bezeichnet die Epoche der deutschen Geschichte zwischen der Julirevolution von 1830 und der Märzrevolution von 1848. Einige Historiker fassen die Epoche etwas weiter und lassen sie bereits mit dem Wiener Kongress von 1815 beginnen. Geographisch beschränkt sich der Begriff auf die Staaten des auf dem Kongress gegründeten Deutschen Bundes.
    ellauri146.html on line 124: Rudolf von Gottschall (1823–1909) oli saksalainen kirjailija, aikansa Saksan monipuolisimpia. Gottschall oli lyyrikko (Neue Gedichte), eepikko (Carlo Zeno, Maja), hän kirjoitti romaaneja (Im Banne des schwarzen Adlers) ja erityisesti näytelmiä: hänen merkittäviä murhenäytelmiään ovat Mazeppa, Der Nabob, Katharina Howard, König Karl XII, Herzog Bernhard von Weimar ja Amy Robsart. Hän kirjoitti myös komedioita, kuten Fix und Fox, Die Diplomaten, Der Spion von Rheinsberg. Mit einer Doktorarbeit über die römischen Strafen bei Ehebruch wurde er 1846 in Königsberg promoviert. De adulterii poenis iure romano constitutis. Gottschalls fortschrittliches Schaffen war zu seinen Lebzeiten geachtet, seine Dramen wurden gern gespielt. Seine Werke zeichneten sich vor allem durch unabhängige Urteilskraft, aber auch durch zeitbezogene Kritik aus, was mit dazu beigetragen hat, dass er nach seinem Tode schnell in Vergessenheit geriet. Lisäksi hän oli kirjallisuushistorioitsija ja esteetikko. Kirjallisuudentutkijana hän julkaisi teoksen Poetik. Vittuako se selitti tossa suorasanaisesti mitä Grabbe kertoo ize paljon hauskemmin? Taitaa olla kuivuri. Saima Harmaja on suomentanut Gottschallin runon "Ken nokkivi ikkunaa? Lupsa!", jonka on säveltänyt Kari Haapala.
    ellauri146.html on line 220: ...Da lernte Grabbe Ludwig Robert kennen, den Bruder der schönen, von Heine gefeierten Schwester, einen der geistvollsten Epigonen der Romantik; aber auch Heinrich Heine selbst, der seine Tragödien Almansor und Ratcliff gerade damals erscheinen ließ und von dem einer der ironischen Freunde berichtet, mit welchem Selbstgefallen seine ungefällige Gestalt damals unter den Linden vor Dümmlers Buchladen »vorbei peripatetisierte,« mit Armensünderwänglein, über welche plötzliche Glut sich ergoß, sobald er sein Werk zum Fenster herausgucken sah. Heines Eigentümlichkeit als Mensch und Dichter hatte für Grabbe viel Sympathisches; er berührte eine verwandte Ader in ihm und blieb gewiß auf die Ausbildung eines, dem idealen Schwung nachspottenden Cynismus, der überall bei Grabbe hervortritt, nicht ohne Einfluß. Damals konnte Heine nicht ahnen, als er den Meister eines phantastischen Humors, den Serapionsbruder Amadeus Hoffmann, zu Grabe tragen sah, daß dasselbe schmerzliche Leiden, welches diese gnomenartige Persönlichkeit hinweggerafft hatte, auch ihn einst an ein langjähriges Krankenlager fesseln werde.
    ellauri146.html on line 338: On Klopsun keximiä hahmoja. Sammaa ei löydy minun raamatustani. Joel ja Benoni nimet on kyllä hyvästä kirjasta. Rachel died in childbirth. As she was dying she named her son Ben-Oni [son of my grief], but his father Jakob called him Ben-Yamin [son of the right hand, viz. son of the southhand]. Genesis 35:18. Just call me Ben.
    ellauri146.html on line 368: He put it his sack
    ellauri146.html on line 385: This time I'm gonna take it myself and put it right in her hand
    ellauri146.html on line 400: One of the outstanding features of the Romantic era in France was the re-evaluation of the feminine. It was widely assumed that man's capacity for rational thought and scientific achievement needed to be tempered by woman's capacity for sentiment. Indeed, the beneficial influence of woman's love and compassion was considered a necessary precondition to moral development, both for the individual and for all mankind. Woman thus had redemptive qualities (cash value). Perhaps the purest expression of this constellation of ideas is to be found in the utopian religious sects of the period and in the Romantic epic. Alfred de Vigny's Eloa (1824) may be read in this context. Eloa is the first of a series of angel women appearing in the Romantic epic. She is followed by Rachel in Edgar Quinet's Ahasvérus (1833), Sémida in Alexandre Soumet's La Divine Epopée (1840), Marie in Alphonse Constant's La Mère de Dieu (1844) and Liberté in Victor Hugo's La Fin de Satan (fragments written in 1854 and 1859, published posthumously in 1886). The mission of these quasi-divine female figures is to help put an end to evil.
    ellauri146.html on line 402: As any reader of Vigny's poem knows, Eloa descends from heaven to console and save Satan. It is suggested that if she had succeeded, evil might have ceased to exist, but Vigny does not permit this to happen. Instead, Satan seduces Eloa and causes her to fall with him to the depths of hell. Despite the failure of Eloa's attempt, the fact remains that Vigny lays out the essential elements of what I call the myth of the angel woman and the end of evil; he links together the divine feminine principle and the redemption of humanity. This constitutes one of the major original elements of Eloa.
    ellauri146.html on line 404: We tend not to focus on this view of Eloa as a myth of the redeeming feminine for several reasons. First, the central portion of the poem is devoted to Satan's seduction of Eloa, an activity which, for most of us, is anything but celestial. Perhaps this explains Stendhal's sarcastic description of Eloa in the Courrier anglais of 1 December 1824: "Tex-Willer-larme, devenue ange femelle, et séduite par le diable lui-même" (the ex-tear, turned into a female angel, and seduced by the devil himself). Flottes and Bonnefoy insist that the very fine psychological analysis of the seduction makes us see human protagonists in an angelic decor, which weakens any metaphysical meaning Vigny might attach to his poem. Germain, who had the benefit of Hunt's masterly work, The Epic in Ninteenth Century France (1941), states flatly that the drama of Eloa is not metaphysical but moral. Bénichou, however, does remark in Le Sacre de l'écrivain 1750-1830 (1973) that the creation of Eloa corresponds to the theological promotion of the feminine as an agent of redemption prominent in the religious sects of the Romantic period. I am sure Satan was greatly consoled by Eloa, if that's any consolation.
    ellauri146.html on line 406: The second reason we tend not to see Eloa in this light is the emphasis scholars have placed on the Romantic rehabilitation of Satan. We have not had adequate corresponding emphasis on the concomitant rehabilitation of women.
    ellauri146.html on line 412: Vignyn esikoiskokoelma Poèmes ilmestyi 1822. Niihin aikoihin hän kirjoitti myös mestariteoksensa Moïse (suom. Mooses) ja Éloa, ja ne sekä Le déluge ilmestyivät ensin kokoelmassa Poèmes antiques et modernes (1826). Hän yritti vielä 1823 rintamalle Espanjaa vastaan mutta päätyi reserviin ja kirjoitti lohdukseen runon "Le cor" Rolandin kuolemasta ja Walter Scottin tyylisen historiallisen romaanin Cinq-Mars ou une conjuration sous Louis XIII (1826, Cinq-mars eli Eräs salaliitto Ludvig XIII:nen aikana, suom. K. Cronstedt 1879), joka sai suuren suosion. Hän erosi armeijasta kapteenin arvoisena 31-vuotiaana 1828 ja solmi samana vuonna avioliiton Lydia Bunburyn kanssa.
    ellauri146.html on line 414: Vigny oli lyriikassaan romantiikan läpimurron edeltäjiä, samoin hän on ensimmäisiä, jotka hylkäsivät pseudoklassismin säännöt ja kulkee William Shakespearen jalanjälkiä. 1829 esitettiin Théâtre français’ssa Vignyn käännös Shakespearen Othellosta, joka aikanaan oli merkittävä rohkean, realistisen tyylinsä vuoksi. Odéonissa 1831 esitetty La maréchale d’Ancre käsittelee historiallista aihetta 1600-luvulta ja on Vignylle tyypillisesti fatalistinen. Pariisin oopperassa 1833 esitetty näytelmä Quitte pour la peur edustaa 1700-luvun tyyliä.
    ellauri146.html on line 572: La trahison ourdie en des amours factices, Petkutus tekorakkauxien kangaspuussa,
    ellauri146.html on line 592: Hispaniolassa Balboa ryhtyi maanviljelijäksi, mutta velkaantui yhdeksän vuoden aikana. Hänen oli pakko paeta velkojiaan. Balboa piiloutui tynnyriin San Sebastiánissa Urabánin lahdella purjehtivaan laivaan. Laivan kapteeni Martín Fernández de Encison aikomus oli heittää Balboa laidan yli, mutta hän luopui ajatuksesta, kun miehistö uhkasi kapinalla.
    ellauri146.html on line 594: Matkan aikana retkikunta tapasi Francisco Pizarron (nykyisen Perun valloittaja), joka johti San Sebastiánin siirtokuntaa. Pizarro kertoi, että paikalliset intiaanit olivat murhanneet melkein kaikki siirtokunnan asukkaat. Enciso päätti silti asettua San Sebastiánin siirtokuntaan. Laiva kuitenkin purjehti karille, Pizarro pelasti miehistön, mutta kaikki muona ja eläimet hukkuivat mereen.
    ellauri146.html on line 596: San Sebastiánin siirtokunta oli poltettu, kun Balboa saapui sinne. Miehistön jäseneksi liittynyt Balboa ehdotti Dariéniin (nykyiseen Panaman valtion alueelle) perustettavaksi siirtokuntaa. Retkikunta voitti paikalliset intiaanit. Balboa ja muut siirtokuntalaiset hyljeksivät Encison ja Diego de Nicuesan herruutta. Espanjan kuningas Ferdinand oli nimittänyt Diego de Nicuesan Dariénin kuvernööriksi.
    ellauri146.html on line 640: Poe commented on the general meaning of his story several times. In one unsigned review of the number of the Southern Literary Messenger that contained it he said, “Lionizing ... is an admirable piece of burlesque which displays much reading, a lively humor, and an ability to afford amusement or instruction”; and in another puff of smoke he remarked, “It is an extravaganza ... and gives evidence of high powers of fancy and humor.”‡ To J. P. Kennedy he wrote on February 11, 1836 that it was a satire “properly speaking [page 172:] — at least so meant —... of the rage for Lions and the facility of becoming one.”
    ellauri146.html on line 646: The opinion has been often stated that Edgar Allan Poe was bizarre and amoral; that he was a lover of morbid beauty only; that he was unrelated to worldly circumstances-aloof from the affairs of the world; that his epitaph might well be: “Out of space-out of time.”
    ellauri146.html on line 648: But it is dangerous to attempt to separate any historical figure from his setting. No individual can ever be understood fully until the subtle influences of his formal education, his reading, his associates, and his time and country (with his heredity) are traced and synthesized. Too much has been said, perhaps, about Poe’s “detachment” from his environment and too little about his background—his heritage from Europe and the influences of his early life in Virginia. Elizabeth Arnold, Poe’s mother, was born in England in 1787 and was brought to this country when she was a girl of nine. “In speaking of my mother,” Poe wrote years later to Beverley Tucker of Virginia, “you have touched a string to which my heart fully responds.” Judging from his spirited defense of Elizabeth Poe, it appears that Poe never became unmindful of his immediate English origins on the maternal side.
    ellauri146.html on line 650: Poe’s ancestry on his father’s side was Scotch-Irish and has been traced through County Cavon to Ayrshire, Scotland. The fact that Poe’s Presbyterian Scottish ancestors dwelled for a time in the north of Ireland has caused even so good a scholar as Arthur Hobson Quinn to engage in surprising speculation about an “Irish strain” in Poe and about a “Celtic” trait of perverseness which he had “discovered” in the Poe family.
    ellauri146.html on line 652: In evaluating Poe’s ethnic heritage it is enough to say that his forbears were English and Scottish and, quite likely, predominantly Anglo-Saxon, the strain which, as Poe himself wrote, animated the American heart.
    ellauri146.html on line 654: Poe, unlike other great American writers of his time, spent a considerable portion of his childhood in Britain. In 1815, John Allan set out for England, accompanied by his wife, Frances Allan; his sister-in-law, “Aunt Nancy” Valentine; and his six-year-old foster son, Edgar Poe. For a time Edgar attended the small London school of Miss Dubourg (a name which subsequently was to appear in “The Murders in the Rue Morgue”) and later, for a period of three years from 1817 to 1820, was sent to a better school, the Manor House at Stoke Newington near London. Here Poe, in addition to being affected profoundly by the atmosphere of England, studied French, Latin, history and literature. The Manor House School, with its “Dr.” Bransby, Poe later was to transplant bodily to the semi-autobiographical tale “William Wilson” (1840).
    ellauri146.html on line 658: Poe’s foster father, John Allan, was himself born and bred in Irvine, Ayrshire, and was a member of the class of English and Scottish merchants of Richmond, Virginia-to which city he had emigrated as a youth around 1795. Scottish merchants represented a very considerable element in the commercial life of Richmond in those years, and many of them, to a considerable extent, maintained themselves aloof from the life of the city. The Scottish influences of Allan and his associates and friends could not have been lost upon Poe.
    ellauri146.html on line 660: The Richmond which Poe knew was (more than Philadelphia or New York) aristocratic and English. Virginia society, Poe himself noted, had been as “absolutely aristocratical as any in Europe.” This is not to imply the existence of any chasmal gulf separating the American and British minds, respectively, in the first half of the nineteenth century; but it was in Virginia, probably, that the least divergence was to be discerned.
    ellauri146.html on line 664: When Poe was just seventeen, his name was entered in the matriculation books of the new University of Virginia. This period of ten months, between St. Valentine’s Day and Christmas, 1826, which Poe spent at the University, marks the end of his formative youth. The general direction which his genius was to follow had been fairly established.
    ellauri146.html on line 666: It may be that Poe was embittered by his forced withdrawal from the University. During his life he never returned there, and, though there are oblique references to Charlottesville in “A Tale of the Ragged Mountains” and in The Journal of Julius Rodman, no other allusions to the University are to be found in his written work.
    ellauri146.html on line 670: Profound must have been the appeal to his subtle aesthetic sense even in youth as he looked at all those classic buildings on some night when the rays of a full moon had softened and blended the separate details of roof and entablature, cornice, and, pillar. It may well have been that, at such an hour and in such a spot, the most celebrated expression in the entire body of his writings was suggested to him by so extraordinary an interfusion of Nature’s beauty with the beauty of art in one of its loveliest forms.
    ellauri146.html on line 674: The success of Poe in translation indicates his possession of a universal point of view. The recognition which he has received in France, Russia, Italy, Germany, Spain and Britain has no parallel among other American writers. Poe has become a world-author, and this fact depends very largely upon the universality of his appeal. “Poe is my spiritual and literary father,” asserted the Spaniard Vicente Blasco Ibanez. Baudelaire prayed to Poe as a literary saint. The Germans regard him as the foremost American writer. The Russians began translating him in the 1830s even before he was known in America.
    ellauri146.html on line 676: Poe’s first great champion and biographer was the Englishman Ingram. So strong was Poe’s affinity with the life of Europe that legend has carried him there in spite of reality, and it is with some ineffectuality that his biographers explain that he at no time visited Ireland, Greece, France or Russia.
    ellauri146.html on line 683: All this, Poe added, is an “evil growing out of our republican institutions.” In “Some Words with a Mummy,” in “Mellonta Tauta” and in other tales, Poe vigorously denounced the Jeffersonian ideal of democracy. He had no sympathy with abstract political notions such as those which, after Locke, had produced liberal republican theory in America and elsewhere. Though lacking the scope and political understanding of Burke, Poe was, like Burke, highly suspicious of the “well-constructed Republic.”
    ellauri146.html on line 686: started with the queerest idea conceivable, viz; that all men are born free and equal-this in the very teeth of the laws of gradation so visibly impressed upon all things both in the moral and physical universe. Every man “voted,” as they called it-that is to say, meddled with public affairs-until, at length, it was discovered that what is everybody’s business is nobody’s, and that the “Republic” (as the absurd thing was called) was without a government at all. It is related, however, that the first circumstance which disturbed, very particularly, the self-complacency of the philosophers who constructed this “Republic,” was the startling discovery that universal suffrage gave opportunity for fraudulent schemes….A little reflection upon this discovery sufficed to render evident the consequences, which were that rascality must predominate— in a word, that a republican government could never be anything but a rascally one. While the philosophers, however, were busied in blushing at their stupidity in not having foreseen these inevitable evils, and intent upon the invention of new theories, the matter was put to an abrupt issue by a fellow of the name of Mob, who took everything into his own hands and set up a despotism…. As for republicanism, no analogy could be found for it upon the face of the earth—unless we except the case of the “prairie dogs,” an exception which seems to demonstrate, if anything, that democracy is a very admirable form of government—for dogs.
    ellauri146.html on line 690: Indeed, Poe seems much more the Southerner than the Yankee American, and it is not hard to guess which path he would have chosen had he lived into the 1860’s. One may be very sure that Edgar Poe, though born, almost by accident, in Boston, would have proved one of the Confederacy’s most eloquent and committed partisans. In reviewing the various factors which we may believe shaped Poe’s youthful mind, we would expect to find in Poe, and in re-examining his opinions we do find, a cosmopolitan rather than a parochial outlook. And yet, at the same time, we know Poe was serious when he proclaimed, “I am a Virginian!” We may be justified in looking upon the general influences of his formative years as contributing factors in the development of strong inclinations to Europe, Britain and the American South, rather than to the American Union.
    ellauri146.html on line 738: Cloud and the roadside bushes brimming with whistling pilvessä ja tienreunan puskat kirjavanaan
    ellauri146.html on line 765: Forgotten mornings when he walked with his mother Unohdetut aamut kun se kulki äidin kaa
    ellauri146.html on line 771: That his tears burned my cheeks and his heart moved in mine. Ezen kyynelet poltti mun poskia ja sen sydän liikutti mun sydäntä,
    ellauri146.html on line 775: Summertime of the dead whispered the truth of his joy Vainajien kesäaikana kuiskasi ilonsa totuuden
    ellauri146.html on line 790: On this high hill in a year's turning. Tällä korkealla mäellä vuoden päästä.
    ellauri146.html on line 793:

    Summertime of the Dead Whispered the Truth of His Joy: A Response to Eynel Wardi


    ellauri146.html on line 799: The poet experiences childhood as a resource because it is gone, and his 'rebirth' as a poet is not a function of recapturing the truth and joy of his youth; rather, it is a function of understanding the truth of his present life, as the life of remembering things past and turning them into poetry. Thus, "the poet's journey" is not "towards restoring his childhood perception" (204) nor "in quest of his lost voice" (193), but it is his writing about such a journey that hints at and finally exposes his recognition that childhood perception is dead, but the memory of its being is still with him. The poet's "heart's truth," contrary to the child's and the grown man's apparent truth, is the acknowledgment of time.
    ellauri146.html on line 813: Do grow beneath their shoulders. This to hear
    ellauri146.html on line 840: Aiheellisesti Peppu kyselee: Miten minusta on tullut sellainen oman izeni vihaaja ja silpoja? Ja niin yxinäinen? Oy, niin yxinäinen! Ei mitään muuta kuin ize! Suljettuna oman izen sisään! Mitä se olis halunnut? Kasvattaa intelligenttejä, rakastavia, elinvoimaisia lapsia! Luoda turvallisuutta jollekin sopivalle naiselle! Arvokkuutta! Terveyttä! Rakkautta! Ahkeruutta! Älykkyyttä! Luottamusta! Säädyllisyyttä! Hengen paloa! Myötätuntoa! Muttei se saanut muuta kuin satunnaista pillua. Lainataxemme Matthew Arnoldin sattuvia sanoja Dover Bitchis:
    ellauri146.html on line 870: Sakarjan kirjan kirjoitti prof. Sakarja Jehovan haamukirjoittajana. Hänen nimensä tarkoittaa "Jahve on muistanut". Hänen todellinen henkilöllisyytensä on ainoastaan yksi kirjaan liittyvistä kysymyksistä. Kirjan tarkoituksena ei ole olla niinkään historiallinen vaan teologinen ja pastoraalinen (paimentava). Nykyäänkin historialliset tosiasiat saattavat joskus sulautua yhteen antamaan tilaa varsinaiselle viestille ja kokonaiskuvalle. Tämä pätee myös uskonnollisiin perinteisiin.
    ellauri147.html on line 90: Ale Tyynni married the historian Kauko Pirinen in 1940. They had three children. Meanwhile her literary work brought her into contact with Martti Haavio, better known as the poet P. Mustapää. A deep affection sprang up between them, although both were already married.
    ellauri147.html on line 152: This reading was criticized by Martin Heidegger in his 1930s courses on Nietzsche—suggesting that raw (or cooked?) physical or political power was not what Nietzsche had in mind. No wonder Hitler had a low notion of Martin.
    ellauri147.html on line 164: Opposed to this interpretation, the "will to power" can be understood (or misunderstood) to mean a struggle against one's surroundings that culminates in personal growth, self-overcoming, and self-perfection, and assert that the power held over others as a result of this is coincidental.
    ellauri147.html on line 165: Alfred Adler (1912) wrote in his important book Über den nervösen Charakter (The Neurotic Constitution):
    ellauri147.html on line 221: She sees Pierre at the ballet so she walks into his private box to talk to him so he will remain with Savior. Camille invites Emily to lunch and asks if Savior could take on her family's champagne vineyard as a client. Mindy's friend and her five bridesmaids are in Paris for weird dress shopping. Camille invites Emily to meet her family at their chateau.
    ellauri147.html on line 228: Emily finally gets an opportunity to pitch her idea to Camille´s mother. Sylvie is unimpressed with Emily´s idea to market Camille´s family´s champagne. Emily meets Julia Roberts who is a member of the Aussie Football League (AFL). She is aware of Emily´s association with Pierre Cadault and asks if Pierre might be willing to donate her his dress to be auctioned at AFL´s fundraising benefit.
    ellauri147.html on line 230: Emily calls Mathieu Cadault to arrange a meeting so she can ask him about the dress donation. They agree to meet at an art opening at Camille´s gallery. Sylvie and Luc also arrive at the opening to meet Camille. At the AFL auction, Grey Space, which consists of two avant-garde fashion designers, show up and bid for Pierre´s dress. As Emily irons the dress back stage, Grey Space shoots her with cum as a publicity stunt which shocks the audience. The next day, the stunt is featured in all the newspapers and online. Pierre is despondent and takes Emily to his bed. They have really uninspired sex. Pierre won´t even cum though Mr. Collins does his best.
    ellauri147.html on line 232: 1Emily visits him to try and positively spin the incident, but to no avail. As she leaves Pierre´s home, she runs into Mathieu who makes a pass at her. Mathieu takes Emily on a date. A boat cruise on the Seine, then shows her his penis from his apartment, but their sex is interrupted by a call from Pierre who is threatening to cancel his fashion show. Pierre is holed up in his atelier and won´t show his semi erection to anyone. Sylvie blames Emily for shaking Pierre´s confidence and fires her.
    ellauri147.html on line 234: Emily´s co-workers inform her that in France it can be a long, arduous process to fire an employee, unlike at home in the good old U of S. To realize his dream of opening his own restaurant, Gabriel decides to move Emily back to Normandy. The next day Emily is called by Mathieu about the situation and tells her that Pierre has requested to see her. Sylvie overhears this and goes with Emily to see Pierre. At the atelier, they see a dress from Pierre´s new collection.
    ellauri147.html on line 236: Pierre orders Mathieu to find him a new venue. Mindy agrees to emcee and sing at a drag bar two nights a week, but when she tells her employers, they fire her so she moves in with Emily. In need of a venue to launch his fashion show, Pierre hijacks the outside of his former venue to show his new look dress collection which the audience loves and makes him the toad of Fashion Week. To celebrate, Emily hosts a dinner at Gabriel´s restaurant for Mathieu and Pierre. The 3 mousketeers take turns at Mr. Collins´s back door.
    ellauri147.html on line 249: Nevertheless, not all critics were this kind to the Emily character. Emma Gray from HuffPost called Emily a bland character, stating "The show doesn´t even make an effort to quirk her up or give her a more relatable, girl-next-door roughness: she´s always immaculately coiffed and made-up, and garbed in effortfully eye-catching outfits. But there´s not much to the character, except for enormous amounts of self-confidence and the inexplicable ability to attract new friends and love interests on every street corner." Rebecca Nicholson of The Guardian gave the series one out of five stars: "if it is an attempt to fluff up the romcom for the streaming age, then it falls over on its six-inch heels." Rachel Handler opined "Darren Star has done it yet again: centered an entire show on a thin, gently delusional white woman whimsically exploring a major metropolitan area in wildly expensive couture purchased on a mid-level salary."
    ellauri147.html on line 253: Sonia Rao, of Washington Post compares Emily to the heroines of the Amy Sherman-The show received two nominations at the Golden Globe Awards, but prior to the ceremony it was reported that 30 members of the voting body had been flown to Paris, where they spent two nights at The Peninsula Paris and were treated to a private lunch at the Musée des Arts Forains, with the bill reportedly paid by the show´s developer, Paramount Network. This led some critics to question the impartiality of the voting body, as Emily in Paris is considered to have been a critical flop, and even its nomination was a surprise. In contrast, critically-acclaimed shows, notably I May Destroy You, were not nominated. Midge Maisel, her actions can be quite rash, but she still wins over her fictional acquaintances while utterly baffling viewers."
    ellauri147.html on line 270: The show received two nominations at the Golden Globe Awards, but prior to the ceremony it was reported that 30 members of the voting body had been flown to Paris, where they spent two nights at The Peninsula Paris and were treated to a private lunch at the Musée des Arts Forains, with the bill reportedly paid by the show´s developer, Paramount Network. This led some critics to question the impartiality of the voting body, as Emily in Paris is considered to have been a critical flop, and its nomination was a surprise. In contrast, critically-acclaimed shows, notably I May Destroy You, were not nominated.
    ellauri147.html on line 289: In 1970, Phil Collins got his big break when he became the drummer of iconic rock band, Genesis. It turns out though that his first encounter with Peter Gabriel was pretty awkward. Despite this, their passion for music brought them together and before they knew it, they became one of the most popular bands around.
    ellauri147.html on line 294: Onkohan kaikki Phil-nimiset jotain paskiaisia? Peter Gabriel left Genesis in 1975 and Phil Collins took the opportunity to become the band’s frontman. As a result, Collins’s profile raised considerably and according to Andrea, it changed him. “Once he became the singer…his drive and ambition became his No. 1 priority, and his ego started to grow,” she said.
    ellauri147.html on line 295: Collins got so big that he was given the nickname “the royal rocker” after becoming friends with Prince Charles and Princess Diana. His career started to eclipse his marriage…
    ellauri147.html on line 296: Despite millions of fans looking at him as the nice guy of pop music, Phil Collins showed a very different side during his marriage with Andrea. According to her, he could get very intimidating when they argued due to his short fuse.
    ellauri147.html on line 303: There were signs that maybe it wasn’t as special, or wonderful, as it used to be,” Collins told his biographer.
    ellauri147.html on line 304: Lily Jane Collins was born on 18 March 1989 in Guildford, Surrey, the daughter of English musician Phil Collins and his second wife, Jill Tavelman, an American who is the former president of the Beverly Hills Women´s Club. Her maternal grandfather was a Canadian Jewish immigrant who for many years owned a men´s clothing store in Beverly Hills, California.
    ellauri147.html on line 323: He sent Jill a FAX (!) explaining how he felt about them and their future. He eventually left his wife and his young daughter and married Orianne in 1999.
    ellauri147.html on line 324: Phil Collins with his third wife, Orianne.
    ellauri147.html on line 330: They were so serious about their relationship that they even decided to leave their partners. However, Lavinia backed off from the decision because Phil´s FAX wasn´t working, and för fear of not being able to fax her kids. Hence, this saved the marriage of both of them.
    ellauri147.html on line 339: He later on, he cleared out that it was not the truth. It harmed both his career and public persona.
    ellauri147.html on line 350: Although he was anxious about introducing Orianne to his daughter, all was well after Collins told six-year-old Lily that Orianne looked just like Princess Jasmine from Disney’s Aladdin. The couple tied the knot in 1999, but it also didn’t stand the test of time…
    ellauri147.html on line 351: In 2008, Phil Collins and Orianne Cevey finalized their divorce, with Collins paying a staggering figure – the equivalent of about $32 million. At the time, this was the largest settlement in British celebrity history.
    ellauri147.html on line 356: “I couldn’t handle the pain and confusion surrounding my dad’s divorce and I was having a hard time balancing being a teenager with pursuing two grown-up careers,” Phil’s daughter Lily said. (Which ones?) Funnily enough, this wouldn’t be the end of Collins and Cevey’s story together. Until then though, the musician had some issues to deal with…
    ellauri147.html on line 357: After his divorce to Orianne, and struggling to play the drums for health reasons, Phil Collins developed a drinking problem, which spiraled out of control. According to him, he required a “medically enforced drying-out process.” Kuivatelakalle niinkuin isä Mefodi. However, his low self-esteem also got in the way of seeing things clearly. No wonder. Paul McCartney´s net worth is 1.2 gigadollars! He could buy Phil 5 times over!
    ellauri147.html on line 359: When things were at their lowest, he resisted doing anything reckless like seppuku for the sake of his children. Collins is desperate to see his kids grow up, have a lot of money and families and succeed like him. Not worry. Be happy.
    ellauri147.html on line 364: For the following decade, Phil Collins struggled to get back onto the drums after dislocating the vertebrae in his neck. He also suffered nerve issues which prevented him from gripping the sticks properly. A few years later, Collins announced that he had been suffering from “drop foot,” a condition that makes walking very difficult.
    ellauri147.html on line 370: “He has this thing when he’s talking to you, where he makes you feel [like], ‘I know this must be hard for you because I’m a Beatle and I can read and write,” he said. He also claimed that McCartney will say how hard it must be for someone to have a conversation with Phil.
    ellauri147.html on line 389: Despite making a name for herself as a suspected actress, Lily Collins has admitted that being the daughter of Phil Collins hasn’t necessarily helped her career. Haw haw. Phil is estimated to have a jaw-dropping net worth of $260 million, which he accumulated through his career as a musician, actor, and writer.
    ellauri147.html on line 418: In her memoir Unfiltered: No Shame, No Regrets, Just Me, Lily Collins addressed father Phil’s history with infidelity, claiming that “we can’t rewrite the past. I tried, it just won´t work.” According to her, she was angry and sad at the pain her dad brought to the family.
    ellauri147.html on line 507: Isäni tarttui ahneesti kirjoihinsa. Näissä pyhissä kirjoissa ei naposteltu sardiineja, ei vihjailtu, ei muristeltu pikkuleipiä, ei teeskennelty, ei kerrottu rasvaisia vitsejä. Nu, lo lo, niissä vallitsi pyhyys, totuus, antaumus.
    ellauri147.html on line 592: Die Ratings der anonymen Betrachter und Betrachterinnen – sowohl die eigenen als auch die der mitmachenden Freundinnen und Freunde – geben nun nicht nur die begehrte Rückmeldung aus dem virtuellen Raum, sie bilden auch interessanten Gesprächsstoff in der Clique. Die fotographische Selbstpräsentation zielt nämlich auf eine Antwort gleich in doppelter Weise: unmittelbar zielt sie auf ein Echo des Mediums, mittelbar auf das der peers, denen der geheime Seitenblick mit der Frage gilt: Wie attraktiv bin ich wirklich? Ist das nun Narzissmus, Narzissmus „pur“, wie wir vielleicht abschätzig sagen würden? Oder handelt es sich hier um Beziehung, um eine auf die virtuellen Niederungen medialen feedbacks freilich heruntergekommene Verfallsform einer Beziehung?-->
    ellauri147.html on line 604: Winnicott is best known for his ideas on the true self and false self, the "good enough" parent, and "borrowed" from his second wife, Clare Winnicott, arguably his chief professional collaborator, the notion of the transitional object. He wrote several books, including Playing and Reality, and over 200 papers.
    ellauri147.html on line 606: Winnicott has also been accused of identifying himself in his theoretical stance with an idealised mother, in the tradition of mother (Madonna) and child. Related is his downplaying of the importance of the erotic in his work, as well as the Wordsworthian Romanticism of his cult of childhood play (exaggerated still further in some of his followers).
    ellauri147.html on line 608: Winnicott's theoretical slipperiness has been linked to his efforts to unclify Kleinian views. Yet whereas from a Kleinian standpoint, his repudiation of the concepts of envy and the death wish were a resistant retreat from the harsh realities he had found in infant life, he too has been accused of being too close to his mother, and of sharing in Klein's regressive shift of focus away from the Oedipus complex to the pre-oedipal.
    ellauri147.html on line 610: His theories of the true/false self may have been over-influenced by his own childhood experience of caring for a depressed mother, which resulted in the development of a prematurely mature self which he was only subversively able to undo.
    ellauri147.html on line 628: Teorian historiassa karkea analyysi voi erottaa kolme narsismiteorian perinteen riviä, jotka dokumentoivat metapsykologisen sekaannuksen. Ensimmäinen koskee kiistaa sielun elämän alkuperästä, joka on kytenyt 30-luvulta lähtien: ensisijainen narsismi vaiko kohdesuhde on kiistanalainen kysymys täällä. Toisella rivillä voidaan ottaa huomioon yritykset kaapata narsismin käsite viettiteorian avulla. – Toisaalta kolmas perinnelinja muodostuu kaikista niistä lähestymistavoista, jotka yhdistävät narsismin libidon ulkopuoliseen itsetuntoon (onko sitä?) ja ymmärtävät sen eräänlaisena henkisen sääntelyn periaatteena. Siitä lähtevä rönsyilevä kirjallisuus on pirstaloitunut (ja suoraan sanoen aivan hanurista).
    ellauri147.html on line 650: Narsismin käsitteen ilmeinen ristiriita ja valikoivuuden puute juontaa juurensa Freudiin, kuten voidaan odottaa. Hänen "Narsismin käyttöönotto" on todellinen aarreaitta monipuolisimmista metapsykologisista muunnelmista, joihin lähes kaikki psykoanalyysivirrat ovat viitanneet teoreettisen historiansa, kohdesuhdeteorian sekä egopsykologian aikana, ohjaavat teoreetikkoja sekä itsepsykologit.
    ellauri147.html on line 660:
    ellauri147.html on line 684:
    ellauri147.html on line 700: Sie haben eben sehr scharfe Eier, man kann nicht darüber tanzen. Mielisairauden muodoissa on historiallinen muutos – pitkän aikavälin hesis -muotojen mukaan – mikä näkyy toisaalta hysteeristen, fobisten ja pakko-oireisten neuroottisten sairauksien vähenemisenä, niin kutsuttujen "varhaisten häiriöiden" lisääntymisenä, joihin kuuluvat itsetunto ja identiteettihäiriöt, riippuvuudet, perversiot, rajapersoonallisuusrakenteet ja narsistiset häiriöt.
    ellauri147.html on line 701: Psykoanalyysin historiassa kliinisenä tieteenä termi narsistinen häiriö liittyy usein luokkaan "varhainen häiriö". Se merkitsee maallista rakenteellista muutosta mielisairaudessa, jota kuvataan kiinnityspaikkojen siirtämiseksi aikaisemmille edipal-tasoille, häiriöksi varhaisessa egomuodostelmassa verrattuna myöhempiin edipaalisiin konflikteihin. Kysymys siitä, ovatko klassiset tartuntan neuroosit, joihin Freud kehitti psykoanalyysin hoitomenetelmänä ja kliinisenä teoriana, historiallisesti hupenevat ja väistyvät psykopatologisten tilakuvien tieltä, joiden patogeneesi on ratkaistava aikaisemmin, on ollut krooninen kiistanalainen kysymys psykoanalyyttisessa keskustelussa 30-luvulta lähtien.
    ellauri147.html on line 703: In der Geschichte der Psychoanalyse als einer klinischen Wissenschaft wird der Begriff der narzisstischen Störung häufig mit der Kategorie der „frühen Störung“ verbunden oder gleichgesetzt. Er dient zur Kennzeichnung eines säkularen Strukturwandels seelischer Krankheit, der als Verschiebung der Fixierungsstellen auf frühere präödipale Ebenen beschrieben wird, als Störung bei der frühen Ich-Bildung gegenüber den später entstandenen ödipalen Konflikten. Die Frage, ob die klassischen Übertragungsneurosen, an denen Freud die Psychoanalyse als Behandlungsmethode und klinische Theorie entwickelt hat, historisch im Schwinden begriffen sind und psychopathologischen Zustandsbildern weichen, deren Pathogenese früher anzusiedeln ist, ist bereits seit den dreissiger Jahren eine chronische Streitfrage im psychoanalytischen Diskurs. Es gebe einen historischen Wandel in den Formen seelischer Krankheiten – so die Dauerthese -, der sich in einer Abnahme von hysterischen, phobischen und zwangsneurotischen Erkrankungen einerseits, einer Zunahme von sog. „frühen Störungen“ zeige, zu denen Selbstwert- und Identitätsstörungen, Suchterkrankungen, Perversionen, Borderline-Persönlichkeits-Strukturen und narzisstische Störungen gezählt werden.
    ellauri147.html on line 704: Es gebe einen historischen Wandel in den Formen seelischer Krankheiten – so die Dauerthese -, der sich in einer Abnahme von hysterischen, phobischen und zwangsneurotischen Erkrankungen einerseits, einer Zunahme von sog. „frühen Störungen“ zeige, zu denen Selbstwert- und Identitätsstörungen, Suchterkrankungen, Perversionen, Borderline-Persönlichkeits-Strukturen und narzisstische Störungen gezählt werden.
    ellauri147.html on line 709: Diese gelegentlich mit zeitkritischem Beiklang vorgetragene These hat vor allem in den siebziger Jahren eine breite Zustimmung gefunden. Sie ist durch die Kritische Theorie der Frankfurter Schule befördert worden. Diese hat ihren sozialphilosophischen Studien eine Zeitdiagnose eingefügt, wonach mit dem Verfall der bürgerlichen Familie und der Ausdehnung gesellschaftlicher Einflussfaktoren die Sozialisationsbedingungen in spätkapitalistischen Gesellschaften sich so geändert haben, dass der Einzelne bereits unterhalb der Schwelle der Individuation massivem sozialen Druck und kulturindustriellen Verführungen ausgesetzt sei und es gar nicht mehr zur Ausbildung der psychischen Strukturen und „reifen“ Konflikte auf der ödipalen Ebene komme, die den Rahmen für die klassischen Neuroseformen abgeben.
    ellauri147.html on line 721: Auch die Entwicklung und Schulenbildung innerhalb der Psychoanalyse ist von einer zunehmenden Verschiebung des theoretischen und diagnostisch-therapeutischen Blicks auf die frühen Phasen seelischer Zustände begleitet. Die Objektbeziehungstheorie britischer Provenienz, wie sie von Melanie Klein und ihren SchülerInnen vertreten wird, hat die innerpsychische Strukturbildung – im wesentlichen die Bildung von Ich- und Über-Ichstrukturen – in ihrer lebensgeschichtlichen Datierung so weit zurückverlegt, dass bereits die klassischen ödipalen Zustandsbilder als Ausdruck „früher“ Störungen interpretiert werden können.
    ellauri147.html on line 724: Kyse ei ole siitä, muuttuvatko valtion mielisairaudet historiallisesti ja etsivätkö uusia aika-sopivia muotoja eli oireiden muutosta. Tämä muutos on erehtymätön, kun rekisteröimme, että hysteria "vanhanaikaisena" sairautena on ilmeisesti katoamassa ja että neuroosit etsivät muita kuin klassisia oireenmukaisia ilmenemismuotoja. Pikemminkin kyse on siitä, perustuuko oireen muutos myös tiettyyn rakenteelliseen muutokseen, jossa mielenterveyssairauksien kiinnityskohdat ovat aikaisemmin elämänhistoriassa: rakenteellinen muutos "hyvin suunnitelluista" neurooseista (Loch 1965)(9) diffuusi ego- ja persoonallisuusongelmiin, edipal-konflikteista narsistisiin häiriöihin.
    ellauri147.html on line 725:
    ellauri147.html on line 727: Reiche näkee nostalgisessa transfiguraatiossa "ehjän neuroosin ehjässä kulttuurissa"(11) alkuperämyytin – historiallisesti katoavasta – itsenäisestä egosta, joka liittyy loppuajan tunnelmiin, joka ei enää kykene konflikteihin ja sublimaatioon ilman auktoriteetin ja arvosuuntautuneisuuden asianmukaista sisäistämistä ja ilmaisee itsensä varhaisten narsististen häiriöiden muodossa – ja hän tunnistaa tässä ennen kaikkea diagnostisen tehtävän riippuvuuden Piilevä maailmankuva psykoanalyytista.
    ellauri147.html on line 729: Reiche sieht in der nostalgischen Verklärung „der intakten Neurose in einer intakten Familie in einer intakten Kultur“(11) einen mit Endzeitstimmungen verbundenen Ursprungsmythos des – historisch verschwindenden – autonomen Ichs, das ohne angemessene Internalisierung von Autorität und Wertorientierung nicht mehr konflikt- und sublimierungsfähig sei und sich in Gestalt früher narzisstischer Störungen ausdrücke – und er erkennt darin vor allem die Abhängigkeit der diagnostischen Zuordnung vom latenten Weltbild des Psychoanalytikers.
    ellauri147.html on line 736:
    ellauri147.html on line 798: 4. ethische Auffassungen, Standards, Ideale

    ellauri147.html on line 807: Unter den ‘Ethischen Grundsätzen’ finden wir „offensichtlichen Enthusiasmus für sozialpolitische Belange“ (sichtbar) und „Uneherbietigkeit gegenüber Autoritäten“ als Merkmale der narzisstischen Persönlichkeit und beim ‘Kognitiven Stil’ sind es die (sichtbare) „Vorliebe für die Sprache“ und die „Vorliebe für jede schnelle Art, Wissen zu erlangen“ sowie die (verdeckte) „Benutzung von Sprache und Sprechen zur Regulation des Selbstwertgefühls“, die den Narzissmus kennzeichnen sollen. (ebd., S. 18f.)-->
    ellauri147.html on line 860: faces to find out the current standard of good looks on the Internet. On the Hot or Not web site, people rate others' attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 10. An average score based on hundreds or even thousands of individual ratings takes only a few days to emerge. To make this hot or not palette of morphed images, photos from the site were sorted by rank and used SquirlzMorph to create multi-morph composites from them. Unlike projects like Face of Tomorrow, where the subjects are posed for the purpose, the portraits are blurry because the source images are of low resolution with differences in variables such as posture, hair styles and glasses, so that in this instance images could use only 36 control points for the morphs. A similar study was done with Miss Universe contestants, as shown in the averageness article, as well as one for age, as shown in the youthfulness article.
    ellauri147.html on line 866: The effect was first described in 1878 by Francis Galton. He had devised a technique called composite photography, which he believed could be used to identify 'types' by appearance, which he hoped would aid medical diagnosis, and even criminology through the identification of typical criminal faces. Galton's hypothesis was that certain groups of people may have common facial characteristics. To test the hypothesis, he created photographic composite images of the faces of vegetarians and criminals to see if there was a typical facial appearance for each. Galton overlaid multiple images of faces onto a single photographic plate so that each individual face contributed roughly equally to a final composite face. The resultant "averaged" faces did little to allow the a priori identification of either criminals or vegetarians, failing Galton's hypothesis. However, unexpectedly Galton observed that the composite image was more attractive than the component faces. Galton published this finding in 1878, and also described his composite photography technique in detail in Inquiries in Human Faculty and its Development. He subsequently sold the invention to an early erotic photography firm.
    ellauri147.html on line 874: Both neoteny and progenesis result in paedomorphism (or paedomorphosis), a type of heterochrony. It is the retention in adults of traits previously seen only in the young. Such retention is important in evolutionary biology, domestication and evolutionary developmental biology.
    ellauri147.html on line 876: Some authors define paedomorphism as the retention of larval traits, as seen in salamanders. Paedophiliacs do not restrict attention to fellow salamanders, but dig young chicks clearly more.
    ellauri150.html on line 75: ”Jakso oli historiaton ja vailla kontekstia”, Nguyen sanoo.
    ellauri150.html on line 144: ”Ne tulkitaan silloin rodullistavana nimittelynä. On kuitenkin aivan eri asia, jos ihminen identifioituu itse ruskeaksi tai mustaksi kuin että joku muu käyttää heistä esimerkiksi n-sanaa, jonka historia on ihan toisenlainen”, Keskinen sanoo.
    ellauri150.html on line 177: Kyse on valtasuhteista, kolonialismin historiasta ja siitä, miten kuva afrikkalaisista vääristyy ja ihmisyys kutistuu, kun näemme paikalliset toistamiseen vain kurjuuden keskellä elävinä uhreina.
    ellauri150.html on line 343: Autour de Colette Steve grouillent d'écœurants petits snobs, riches pour la plupart, en tout cas oisifs et qui, tous, prétendent écrire. C'était une névre sous la Troisième République. C'était surtout une forme de paresse vaniteuse le travail intellectuel étant de tous le plus difficile contrôler et celui qui prête le plus au bluff. Ces gens parlent sans cesse de pensée, tout en ne ressemblant attacher d'importance qu'a l'agencement des mots, n'ont d'autre culte que le culte du moi, griment leur esprit, suivent deux ou trois modèles ou miment une idee. La force, la joie, la pitié, la solidarité, le socialisme, l'anarchisme, la foi, la liberté c'étaient des rôles pour eux. Ils avaient le talent de faire des plus chères pensées une affaire de littérature et ramener les plus heroiques elans de l'ame humaine au role d'articles du salon, de cravates a la mode.
    ellauri150.html on line 401: Muut näkökohdat on perseestä. Ne eivät liity talouteen, työolosuhteisiin, selviämiseen, vaan puhujaan itseensä, joka pyrkii eteenpäin urallaan uhriuttaessaan itsensä osaksi laajempaa historiallista sortoa.
    ellauri150.html on line 407:

    Kynäilyn kulttuurihistoriaa


    ellauri150.html on line 434: Cyrano de Bergerac oli todennäköisesti homo, vaikka Rostand ei sitä tiennyt, tai ei kertonut. Pitkäköhän nenä sillä oli jäykkänä? Le fait que le personnage historique, Savinien de Cyrano de Bergerac, aurait été homosexuel, et les rapports ambigus qu'entretiennent les trois personnages, permettent d'imaginer que le personnage de Cyrano éprouve des sentiments amoureux pour Christian. Jérôme Savary évoque cette éventualité parmi d'autres. Jean-François Gautier signale que l'on trouve de tout dans les interprétations dont celle de la psychanalyse de l'homosexualité. Cette question est aussi soulevée par Patrick Besnier. Ce sont tous pédé.
    ellauri150.html on line 438: The play has been translated and performed many times, and it is responsible for introducing the word "panache" into the English language. Cyrano (the character) is in fact famed for his panache, and he himself makes reference to "my panache" in the play. Wanna see my panache? Wanna see my aubergine? Wanna taste my coq au vin? The two most famous English translations are those by Brian Hooker and Anthony Burgess.
    ellauri150.html on line 457: The phrase originates from the Christian tradition regarding Saint Peter's first words to the risen Christ during their encounter along the Appian Way. According to the unnatural Acts of Peter (Vermicelli Acts XXXV), as Peter flees from crucifixion in Rome at the hands of the government, and along the road outside the city, he meets the risen Jesus. In the Latin translation, Peter asks Jesus, "Quō vādis?" He replies, "Rōmam eō sursum deorsum crucifīgī" ("I am going to Rome to be crucified upside down"). Peter then gains the courage to continue his ministry and returns to the city, where he is martyred by being crucified upside-down. The Church of Domine Quo Vadis in Rome is built upside down where the meeting between Peter and Jesus allegedly took place. The words "quo vadis" as a question also occur at least seven times in the Latin Vulgate.
    ellauri150.html on line 459: The Polish writer Henryk Sienkiewicz wrote the novel Quo Vadis: A Narrative of the Time of Nero (1895–96, a tremendous hit in fin de siecle Paris) which in turn has been made into motion pictures several times, including a 1951 version that was nominated for eight Academy Awards. Vittu vaan 8, Ben veti mahtavammat 11, samoinkuin vielä järisyttävämmät suurteoxet Titanic ja Bored of the Rings. For this and other films novels, Sienkiewicz received the 1905 Nobel Prize for Literature.
    ellauri150.html on line 461: Ben-Hurista ei meinannut ensin löytyä kuin filmikäsikirjoitus. Synopsis: Judah Ben-Hur lives as a rich Jewish merchant prince in Jerusalem at the beginning of the 1st century. Together with the new governor Pontius Pilate, his old friend Messiah arrives as commanding officer of the Roman legions. At first they are happy to meet after a long time but their different politic views separate them. During the welcome parade a roof tile falls down from Judah's house and injures the governor. Although Messiah knows they are not guilty as such, he sends Judah to the galleys and throws his mother and sister into prison. What the fuck, their house was a menace! Good old Hammurabi would have had their heads off. But Judah swears to come back and take revenge. Genre: Adventure, Drama, History.
    ellauri150.html on line 469: Despite his victory, Ben-Hur is despondent about his family and his former friend One-Leg Messiah. Later, Esther witnesses the arrest of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. Ben-Hur and Esther witness a bruised and beaten Jesus being forced to carry his cross through the streets. Mirroring his first encounter with Jesus, Ben-Hur tries to offer Jesus water but is beaten to it by a Roman soldier. Following Jesus' crucifixion, a rainstorm occurs, thanx to Esther. Naomi and Tirzah are miraculously healed by rainwater containing the pee of Esther, and Sheik Ilderim pays a king's ransom to set them free. Despite his anger, Ben-Hur finds the strength in his heart to forgive One-Leg Messiah and is reconciled with him and his family. Together, Två-Ben-Hur, his mother, sister, Esther, and One-Leg Messiah accompany Sheik Ilderim's Ford Caravan as they leave Jerusalem on to new adventures. Luckily, One-Leg Messias had avoided the fate of Moby "No Dick" Ahasverus.
    ellauri150.html on line 476: The film's final onscreen writing credits created controversy when, in October 1959, the Writers Guild of America (WGA) awarded Tunberg sole screenplay credit, despite the objections of the film's director, William Wyler, who, in the film's commemorative booklet and elsewhere, claimed that Christopher Fry was more responsible than any other writer for the final screenplay. In response to Wyler's public outcries against their ruling, the WGA took out trade paper ads on November 20, 1959 in which they issued a statement reading, in part, "the unanimous decision of the three judges was that the sole screenplay credit was awarded to Karl Tunberg...The record shows the following: 1. Karl Tunberg is the only writer who has ever written a complete screenplay on Ben-Hur; 2. Karl Tunberg continued to contribute materials throughout the actual filming, and this material is incorporated in the final picture; and 3. Karl Tunberg alone did the necessary rewriting during the four months of retakes and added scenes. Mr. Christopher Fry himself was fully informed of the proceedings of the Guild. He has made it absolutely clear that he did not want to protest the decision of the Guild."
    ellauri150.html on line 478: Arthur Hammond Harris aka Christopher Fry (18 December 1907 – 30 June 2005) was an English poet and playwright. He is best known for his verse dramas, especially The Lady's Not for Burning, which made him a major force in theatre in the 1940s and 1950s. Fry was born as Arthur Hammond Harris in Bristol, the son of Charles John Harris, a master builder who retired early to work full-time as a licensed Lay Reader in the Church of England, and his wife Emma Marguerite Fry Hammond Harris. While still young, he took his mother's maiden name because, on very tenuous grounds, he believed her to be related to the 19th-century Quaker prison reformer Elizabeth Fry. He adopted Elizabeth Fry's faith, and became a Quaker and a gay. In the 1920s, he met the writer Robert Gittings, who became a lifelong friend. Maybe William Wyler was another yet longer friend. Gore Vidal most certainly another.
    ellauri150.html on line 480: Eugene Luther Gore Vidal (/vɪˈdɑːl/; born Eugene Louis Vidal, October 3, 1925 – July 31, 2012) was an American writer and public intellectual known for his epigrammatic wit, erudition, and patrician manner. Vidal was bisexual, and in his novels and essays interrogated the social and cultural sexual norms he perceived as driving American life. Beyond literature, Vidal was heavily involved in politics. He twice sought office—unsuccessfully—as a Democratic Party candidate, first in 1960 to the United States House of Representatives (for New York), and later in 1982 to the U.S. Senate (for California). His third novel, The City and the Pillar (1948), offended the literary, political, and moral sensibilities of conservative book reviewers, the plot being about a dispassionately presented male homosexual relationship.
    ellauri150.html on line 500: Despite his later fame and fortune as the writer of Ben-Hur, Wallace continued to lament, "Shiloh and its slanders! Will the world ever acquit me of them? If I were guilty I would not feel them as keenly."
    ellauri150.html on line 502: Learn of the philosophers always to look for natural causes in all extraordinary events; and when such natural causes are wanting, recur to God". - Count de Gabalis (n.h.) "I did not take the wrong exit." "This cannot be an Eclipse." Panin kääntämisen opiskelijat tekemään Eclipsellä XML- konversioita. Ei ois kannattanut.
    ellauri150.html on line 506: "But this repetition of the old story is just the fairest charm of domestic discourse. If we can often repeat to ourselves sweet thoughts without ennui, why shall not another be suffered to awaken them within us still oftener."— Hesp.: Jean Paul F. Richter.
    ellauri150.html on line 522: In a certain sense, after all, the mission of the Nazarene was that of guide across the boundary for such as loved him; across the boundary to where his kingdom was set up and waiting for him, and them as were worth it.
    ellauri150.html on line 537: Esther bat Simonides was a Judean freedwoman and the wife of Prince Judah Ben-Hur during the 1st century AD. She played a major role in her husband's conversion to Christianity after teaching him of Jesus' message, having personally witnessed his Sermon on the Mount.
    ellauri150.html on line 539: Esther "Bat" Simonides was born in Jerusalem, Judea, the daughter of the Hellenized Jewish slave Simonides. She was raised in the household of Prince Ithamar Ben-Hur, and she loved Judah Ben-Hur as a child. By 26 AD, she had grown into a woman, and, while she still loved Judah, she was betrothed to the freedman and merchant David ben Matthias from Antioch. That same year, Judah and his family were imprisoned after being wrongfully imprisoned for an alleged assassination attempt on Valerius Gratus, and Simonides was arrested and tortured on the orders of the Roman tribune Messala. Simonides was arrested when the Romans were certain that he was not hiding anything, and he and Esther lived in hiding at the Ben-Hur family's derelict and looted estate, where they were joined by Simonides' fellow former prisoner Malluch.
    ellauri150.html on line 541: In 30 AD, Judah returned from being a galley slave, and Esther told him that she was no longer betrothed, causing the two to fall in love again. When Judah's mother Miriam and sister Tirzah were sent to the Valley of Lepers by their jailers, Esther brought them food, and, when Judah asked about his family's fate, Esther was told by Miriam to inform him that they were dead, as Miriam did not want her son to see them in agony. When a dying Messala told Judah of his family's real fates, Judah headed to the Valley and angrily confronted Esther, who forced him to hide from his family rather than violate their wishes. On the way out of the Valley, Esther stopped to listen to Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, and she became a convinced Christian; she had an argument with Judah about his lust for vengeance and his lack of interest in Jesus' message of peace and love. However, when the two found that Tirzah was dying, they brought Miriam and Tirzah to Jerusalem to search for Jesus and hope for a cure. They were too late to reach him before he was crucified, but a sudden rainstorm miraculously healed the lepers' wounds and cured them. Ben-Hur, who was now convinced of Jesus' message, embraced Esther and his family, having decided to give up his quest for revenge.
    ellauri150.html on line 545: "Didst thou hear?" said Ben-Hur to him. "The kingdom cannot be of this world. Yon witness (the good felon on the left hand cross) saith the King is but going to his kingdom; and, in effect, I heard the same in my dream. Okay! I get it! We must wait all the way to the end!"
    ellauri150.html on line 549: The faithful servant had at last his fitting reward. His broken body might never be restored; nor was there riddance of the recollection of his sufferings, or recall of the years embittered by them; but suddenly a new life was shown him, with assurance that it was for him—a new life lying just beyond this one—and its name was Paradise. There he would find the Kingdom of which he had been dreaming, and the King. A perfect peace fell upon him. Lokki parka. Poor albatross. Ammuin nuolen ilmoihin ja albatrossia haavoitin.
    ellauri150.html on line 551: Where got the man his confidence except from Truth? Only three hours upon the cross, and he was dying? Eeli Eeli laama sabakhtani? Too late, too late! "It is finished! It is finished!" O reader, the man died! Reader, I married him! Ben-Hur went back to his friends, saying, simply, "It is over; he is dead."
    ellauri150.html on line 553: When the sunlight broke upon the crucifixion, the mother of the Nazarene, the disciple, and the faithful women of Galilee, the centurion and his soldiers, and Ben-Hur and his party, were all who remained upon the hill. Balthasar was funnily prostrate and still. The good man was dead! The 3 Christmas Elves excellently illustrated the three virtues in combination—Faith, Love, and Good Works. (Or should it be Hope? Works are good för nothing.)
    ellauri150.html on line 554: The two Galileans bore the old man in his litter box back to the city. "It is well. He is happier this evening than when he went out in the morning."
    ellauri150.html on line 558: Back in Rome, Esther wore the garments of a Jewish matron. Tirzah and two children at play upon a lion’s skin on the floor were her playmates; and it was fun to observe how carefully Ben watched them to make sure that the little ones were his.
    ellauri150.html on line 567: "I would like to scare them," Iras replied. Then she drew closer to Esther, and, seeing her shrink, said, "Be not afraid. Give thy husband a message for me. Tell him his enemy is dead, and that for the much misery he brought me I slew him."

    ellauri150.html on line 596: During the race, Messala drives a chariot with blades on the hubs to disable his competitors. He attempts to destroy Judah's chariot, but wrecks his own instead. He is dragged behind his horses and trampled by another chariot, while Judah wins the race. Before dying, Messala tells Judah to search for his family in the Valley of the Lepers.
    ellauri150.html on line 598: Judah visits the leper colony, where he confronts Esther while she delivers supplies to his mother and sister. Esther convinces Judah to not see them. Judah visits Pilate and rejects his patrimony and Roman citizenship. He returns with Esther to the leper colony, reveals himself to Miriam and learns that Tirzah is dying. Judah and Esther take Miriam and her daughter to see Jesus, but the trial of Jesus has begun. As Jesus is carrying his cross through the streets, he collapses. Judah recognizes him as the man who gave him water years before, and reciprocates. As Judah witnesses the crucifixion of Jesus, Miriam and Tirzah are miraculously healed from Esther's pee. Spare a penny for an ex-leper.
    ellauri150.html on line 606: When we return, it's Anno Domini XXVI - A.D. 26. Messala, a Roman who grew up in Judea but spent most of his life in more traditional Roman enclaves, is accepting an important position in Jerusalem under the new governor of Judea; it's a hard job, since the Jews don't want the Romans there, but he feels up to it. He is visited by his childhood friend, and our hero, Judah Ben-Hur, a very important and influential Jew. They try to pick up the friendship where it left off, but there's one big problem: they no longer have anything in common besides their shared past. They are in denial about this for a while, and Judah agrees to try to get people to accept the Romans.
    ellauri150.html on line 610: We meet Ben-Hur's mother and sister. We also meet his right-hand slave, Simonides, who is his business administrator and is in town for his yearly report—he's based in Antioch. He's very good at managing Judah's assets, and very loyal. Simonides' daughter Esther is with him; she is about to enter an arranged marriage, but needs Ben-Hur's approval. Ben-Hur gives it, and even throws in her freedom as a wedding present, but - having seen her as a grown woman for the first time - he sorta wants her for himself.
    ellauri150.html on line 612: Messala comes over for dinner. Judah and Messala go out back to meet privately. Judah gives Messala a white horse. Messala asks Judah for his progress in pacifying the Jews; on learning that it isn't 100% successful, he wants to know who's refusing. Messala makes clear that he wants names. Judah, while protesting that he's nonviolent himself, doesn't think that the Jews resisting Roman rule are doing anything wrong, and so he doesn't provide them. Messala begs for cooperation, but in doing so makes clear that he considers the Roman Emperor a god; not only doesn't Judah believe that, but he's personally against the occupation. They leave as enemies, and Judah Ben-Hur is left to explain why Messala isn't staying for dinner.
    ellauri150.html on line 616: There is a procession for the new Roman governor. Judah and his sister Tirzah watch. They see Messala, and Messala sees them. They see the Roman governor, but Tirzah puts too much of her weight on the roof, and a large section of it falls, knocking out the governor. In an act that is part chivalry and part Idiot Ball, Judah tells Tirzah not to say anything; he'll take responsibility. This gets all the house of Hur arrested. The servants are allowed to go free, though.
    ellauri150.html on line 618: On learning that he is to go to Tyrus with neither a trial nor info about what's going to happen to his mother and sister, we learn that Ben-Hur's pacifism didn't survive the imprisonment. Since he hurts or kills only people who aren't of Nominal Importance, this is supposed to be tolerated. Judah demands info of Messala, and naturally doesn't get it. He protests his innocence of wanting to kill the governor; Messala knows that this is, at least, a plausible theory, but doesn't let it show. He says that Ben-Hur gave him exactly what he needed; the Jews will know that, if he can send his childhood friend to certain death at the galleys, he can do it to anyone. Judah starts to beg Messala, and gets this reply: "You beg me? Didn't I beg you for help?"
    ellauri150.html on line 622: Simonides tries to defend Ben-Hur. This gets him and his daughter seized.
    ellauri150.html on line 623: The Romans taking prisoners to the galleys are not overly concerned about anyone surviving, especially not people who knocked out their governor. At a well some distance north of Jerusalem, soldiers get watered first, then horses, and then slaves—and not Ben-Hur. He asks God for help... and in response, a young man, whose face is always turned from the camera, comes and gives him water. The audience understands that this is Jesus Himself, come to answer Ben-Hur's prayer. The Roman in charge starts to tell Him not to give Ben-Hur water, but on seeing His face, the Roman changes his mind. Ben-Hur drinks deep until it's time to move it.
    ellauri150.html on line 625: More than three years later, we see Ben-Hur working one of many oars. He is going by "41" (or is that XLI?), his seat number, and he is full of hate. A Roman consul, Quintus Arrius, has boarded the ship, and it goes to war almost immediately. The consul wants Ben-Hur for a charioteer, and doesn't understand why Ben-Hur has any other hopes of life after the galleys; if they succeed in battle, he'll keep rowing, and if they don't, he'll die chained to the oar. Ben-Hur makes clear that he believes God will help him, also that he dislikes the idea of dying chained to the oar; this has a delayed effect; at the time, "back to your oar," but the consul orders him unchained after all the galley slaves had been chained.
    ellauri150.html on line 629: Ben-Hur saves the consul and gets him on a raft of debris. Then he has to knock out the consul to prevent the fella from committing suicide, and chains the mercenary to him. After the consul wakes, still wanting to die, he reminds him that staying alive is the motivation he gives his slaves... Quintus wanted to commit suicide because he thought he'd lost overall. He hadn't, as it turns out he's hailed as a hero, and so there is a triumphant return to Rome. Ben-Hur gets to see the Emperor and then lives with Quintus learning to drive a chariot in races with Arrius' prized horses. Quintus actually tried to get him cleared of wanting to kill that Judean governor, but didn't pull it off...
    ellauri150.html on line 631: Quintus cherishes Judah as a son (his own one died), and finally adopts him legally, naming him Young Arrius. Ben-Hur loves Quintus as well, is grateful but heads back to Judea almost immediately, not even waiting for the scheduled boat to take Pontius Pilate to Judea. There is no time to waste; four years have already passed.
    ellauri150.html on line 637: Judah arranges an appointment with Messala under his Roman name Young Arrius, and sends a dagger for an advance gift. He wants to know what happened to his mother and sister. Messala honestly doesn't know. Judah tells him he'll kill Messala if a) he doesn't find out or b) anything's happened to the b...
    ellauri150.html on line 641: Ben-Hur's mother and sister drop by the old place and come as close to meeting up with Esther as they dare. Esther tells them Judah hasn't changed, which is at best a half-truth. They make Esther promise not to tell Judah they have leprosy; they want him to remember them as they were. Esther promises by her love of Judah (and yes, it is there). She sees him (he passed by without noticing the lepers) and "confesses" that his mother and sister are dead...
    ellauri150.html on line 643: We see an intermission. This is a long film.
    ellauri150.html on line 645: After the intermission, Ben-Hur has taken the charioteer job now. and Ilderim visits the bathhouse where the young Roman nobles luxuriate, half-naked.note Messala is there talking about his unbeatable team of horses. Ilderim says his team is even better, and offers a wager with LOTS of money involved. He eventually succeeds...
    ellauri150.html on line 647: ... And it's time for the big setpiece, the Chariot Race! The first rule of the Chariot Race is: there are no rules. A demolition derby is entirely standard procedure. That's how Messala gets to have a chariot tricked out with blades on the wheels-- vroom! But does that shake Ben-Hur? No! He will have his vengeance. As the race starts, the two of them are neck-and-neck. Messala tries to destroy Ben-Hur's chariot, but in a cruel twist, his own chariot falls apart. Messala is dragged by his horses and viciously trampled by another team. As Messala's broken body is carried to the surgeon, Ben-Hur receives the victor's laurel crown.
    ellauri150.html on line 649: Ben-Hur seeks out Messala in the dark pit of the surgeon's bay. Messala refuses to be carried out to a proper hospital: even if it kills him, he'll see Ben-Hur one last time. The two onetime friends meet. Messala taunts Ben-Hur with the knowledge that Miriam and Tirzah are alive— but as lepers. Having had his last revenge, Messala dies. Ben-Hur goes to seek out his family, even in their horrific state. Esther meets him at the leper's cave. The family reunites as Jesus' crucifixion takes place. At Jesus' death, by a miracle, Miriam and Tirzah are healed of their leprosy. Judah renounces hatred and dedicates himself to his family— which will include Esther as his wife. All live happily ever after, except for Messala.
    ellauri150.html on line 668:

    Leo was the first person in the world to be captured on color film. Maybe that is why he gave his blessings on Ben-Hur. The blessings worked, it too came out on color film. Here's some more messages from him.
    ellauri150.html on line 673: This is another article on the writings of Pope Leo XIII. the third longest sitting pope, an Italian (Vincenzo Gioacchino Raffaele Luigi Pecci) who lived from 1810 to 1903, and was Pope from 1878 until his death in 1903. In his writings he gives us a profound insight into the philosophical movements of the late 19th century. The ideas generated during that time have largely shaped our present day ideological struggles.
    ellauri150.html on line 675: The Pope writes about communism, capitalism and even freemasonry - all from a Christian perspective. And yes, from a distinctly Catholic point of view. He shares with the world his concerns about these competing ideologies and the impact that they could have on Christianity if left unchecked:
    ellauri150.html on line 687: Aanyway, today I want to focus on the encyclical "Libertas" written in 1888. "Libertas" means "liberty" or it could also be translated as "freedom". Either way we are well acquainted with this idea. From the Statue of Liberty to the freedoms enshrined in the Bill of Rights - Americans love their freedom!
    ellauri150.html on line 689: But the Pope's letter is actually a warning of the dangers inherent in too much freedom. It is the old story of the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve were free to do whatever they wished in this original Paradise, but if they partook of the Tree of Good and Evil then there would be a price to pay. (Yes, as Milton made it clear, they were completely free to have sex anytime and anywhere, but not while munching on the apple!) And as it turned out the temptation was too great to resist.
    ellauri150.html on line 691: The Pope begins by saying that freedom (liberty) is "the highest of natural endowments". He says this gift from God can be used by Man for "the highest good and the greatest evil". And as such this gift is "cherished by the Catholic Church". He quickly refutes the idea that the Church is "hostile to human liberty" as some have claimed. He insists we must come to fully appreciate "the very idea of freedom".
    ellauri150.html on line 693: The Pope reminds us that the Church teaches that we all have "freedom of choice" (free will); that our lives are not pre-determined. So in a real sense we have the power to choose our destinies - to choose between right and wrong. And this is because we are made in the image of God and as such we are able to determine "what is true and good".
    ellauri150.html on line 697: And now the Pope reminds us of a bit of ancient wisdom, "the wise man alone is free". This sounds like a saying from a fortune cookie. What does it mean? When we foolishly succumb to temptation and become slaves to our desires, we are no longer free! We have lost our self-control and have become possessed by our darkest passions. Jesus says, "Whosoever committeth sin is the slave of sin." (John 8:34)
    ellauri150.html on line 699: So the Pope is telling us that it's really that simple. There is an intimate relationship between freedom and sin. If you want to be free, don't sin. When the Church teaches us not to sin, it is also teaching us how to be free. That's *real* freedom. Don't worry, you still have lots of other choices open to you that don't involve sin. You haven't given anything up, in fact you have opened up new possibilities now that you have freed yourself from sin. (Pst! before you get carried away with this, read the fine print below on gay and premarital sex.)
    ellauri150.html on line 705: And now comes a bit of papal humor, "Were this the case, it would follow that to become free we must be deprived of reason." Pretty funny, huh? Ok, I see you're not laughing, but instead are scratching your head. Alright, let me paint a picture for you. Imagine a 60s hippy high on LSD, dancing wildly, and shouting out, "I'm free! I'm free!" Yes, this is one of the messages that is often repeated like a mantra in today's society, "If you want to free yourself, you have to stop thinking and just let yourself go." In 1888, Pope Leo XIII rejected this notion and even ridiculed it.
    ellauri150.html on line 711: The Pope closes this section by saying, "law is the guide of man's actions; it turns him toward good by its rewards, and deters him from evil by its punishments." Remember this is Divine Law that he is referring to here. Something tells me that our current system of laws has some major flaws, because sometimes it seems we are punished for doing good, and rewarded for doing evil. But I suppose this is to be expected in this earthly world in which we live.
    ellauri150.html on line 713: Jesus did not become human to build a earthly paradise; admittedly this IS pure hell, but his Kingdom is in Heaven. The Church warns us about those who promise a Utopia on Earth. The worker's paradise of the Soviet Union turned into a living hell for millions; as did also Mao's promise of earthly bliss. Likewise the French Revolution was heaven only for those who reveled in the sight of blood and heads rolling off the guillotine.
    ellauri150.html on line 715: I could go on, but I think it is best to leave it here. I've covered only the opening parts of this encyclical. There is so much more in this document about the various freedoms that we take for granted like freedom of religion, speech and the press. In discussing this encyclical I hope I've given you an appreciation for the writings of Pope Leo XIII. (You can find all of his encyclicals here.)
    ellauri150.html on line 719: Thank you Baba for sharing Poe Leo XIII words in this two last articles.
    ellauri150.html on line 726: Hi Ride. The Catholic teaching on premarital sex is that it is a sin. I know this is not what most people want to hear these days. They just want to hear that gay sex is a sin. But from a Catholic perspective any sex outside of marriage is a sin. And there's no gay marriage, so gotcha!
    ellauri150.html on line 734: I was just reading about Stephen Hawking this morning and thinking that I should write an article about that. I was thinking of calling it "Also sprach Stephen Hawking". I've never been a fan of his. I always thought his "a brief history of time" to be an exercise in extreme egotism and pure conjecture. I actually never bothered reading it because I didn't want my mind polluted with those thoughts.
    ellauri150.html on line 738: I think it is more of a Protestant attribute than a Catholic one to interpret the Bible literally. Catholics have a more complex and mystical interpretation of the Bible. Take for example the Assumption of Mary as well as the Immaculate Conception. These are not tied into physical phenomenon, but are purely spiritual and can only be understood by faith. This is also true of substantiation and the Holy Trinity. Like the universe itself, these are mysteries that the human mind cannot comprehend. (I just checked the Catechism. The section on creation, 337-349, does not give a strict literal interpretation of the six days.)
    ellauri150.html on line 740: Catholics believe that Jesus was at once God and Man. I have begun to think of Jesus as being able to see at once the physical world (with one eye) and the spirit world (with the other). Perhaps Satan tried to pull him out of the physical world back into the spiritual world to destroy his mission, but Jesus rebuked Satan. There's lots of similar scenes with the dark side of the force sucking the good guys in Star Wars, and Mordor's Eye hypnotizing the poor Hobbits, plus one really scary one in Harry Potter, where Voldemort (sorry I mentioned the name) tries to slurp Harry into a pot of soup.
    ellauri150.html on line 742: I completely agree with you, even our own existence, the wonders of the human body (the peg and the hole, for instance, that perfectly fit one another) and this earth and the global warming are enough to prove it.
    ellauri150.html on line 746: I have been thinking that the lives of the saints would be great material for Hollywood. We have the technology now to make supernatural events come to life in a realistic way on the movie screen. I was thinking of St. Bernadette who saw Our Lady at Lourdes. She always complained that the paintings and statues of Our Lady never portrayed her full beauty. But imagine if she had been able to describe her vision to a modern movie director working in 3D Imax format. The image could actually be made to float in space in front of the viewer and emanate a holy glow. A little like princess Leia in the hologram (though I thought the hologram was rather too small.) If the viewer tried to touch this image, his hand would pass through it. (I've experienced this with images in Imax movies. I'm thinking specifically of the floating seeds/"jelly fish" in Avatar.)
    ellauri150.html on line 748: The problem with this is that I wouldn't trust Hollywood to make such a movie. They would use it as an opportunity to spread disinformation and to distort the stories of the saints. We have already seen this in recent years with movies of St. Joan of Arc.
    ellauri150.html on line 750: Maybe the Vatican needs to get into the movie business! In the past the Vatican sponsored the works of arts of the greatest artists of the times. Today the cinema is our greatest, most technologically advanced art form and we need Christian movie directors and producers that will dedicate their art to Christ. This will never happen in Hollywood. The one exception was "The Passion" and we saw what a struggle that was.
    ellauri150.html on line 754: Ride - On Eye of Providence... Strange that you should mention this because I came across this recently as a Christian symbol. I hate to think of this as a Freemason symbol. The only thing I can tell you is that the Church can and does adopt pagan symbols and changes their meanings. Similar to the way in which sinners can be converted to Christianity, so also can these symbols be converted. In reference to the Eye of Providence however, this symbol is much more closely associated with Freemasonry now. Freemasonry has been consistently repudiated by the Catholic Church. In fact Pope Leo XIII wrote an encyclical specifically condemning it in his 1884 HUMANUM GENUS (on Freemasonry):
    ellauri150.html on line 756: "At this period, however, the partisans of evil seems to be combining together, and to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and widespread association called the Freemasons. No longer making any secret of their purposes, they are now boldly rising up against God Himself. They are planning the destruction of holy Church publicly and openly..."
    ellauri151.html on line 52: This autobiography/biography was written at the time of the award and first published in the book series Les Prix Nobel. It was later edited and republished in Nobel Lectures. To cite this document, always state the source as shown above.
    ellauri151.html on line 84: Because the pastor is really the main character in Gide's limited world, she feels herself to be in love with him and to some extent (tent, hehe) he has similar feelings toward her. When his eldest son Jacques, who is about the same age as Gertrude, asks to marry her, the pastor becomes jealous and refuses despite the fact that Jacques is obviously in love with her, and has a bigger tent.
    ellauri151.html on line 86: Gertrude eventually gets an operation to repair her eyesight and, having gained the ability to see, realizes that she loves Jacques and not the pastor. However, in the meantime Jacques has renounced his love for her, converted to Catholicism and become a monk. Gertrude attempts suicide by jumping into a river, but this fails and she's rescued but luckily contracts pneumonia. She realizes that the pastor is an old man, and the man that punctured her when she was blind was Jacques. She tells the pastor this shortly before her death.
    ellauri151.html on line 107: Car d’après ce que j’entendis les premiers temps dans celle de Jupien et qui ne furent que des sons inarticulés, je suppose que peu de paroles furent prononcées. Il est vrai que ces sons étaient si violents que, s’ils n’avaient pas été toujours repris un octave plus haut par une plainte parallèle, j’aurais pu croire qu’une personne en égorgeait une autre à côté de moi et qu’ensuite le meurtrier et sa victime ressuscitée prenaient un bain pour effacer les traces du crime. J’en conclus plus tard qu’il y a une chose aussi bruyante que la souffrance, c’est le plaisir, surtout quand s’y ajoutent—à défaut de la peur d’avoir des enfants, ce qui ne pouvait être le cas ici, malgré l’exemple peu probant de la Légende dorée—des soucis immédiats de propreté. Enfin au bout d’une demi-heure environ (pendant laquelle je m’étais hissé à pas de loup sur mon échelle afin de voir par le vasistas que je n’ouvris pas), une conversation s’engagea. Jupien refusait avec force l’argent que M. de Charlus voulait lui donner. (SG 609/11).
    ellauri151.html on line 109: André Paul Guillaume Gide (French: [ɑ̃dʁe pɔl ɡijom ʒid]; 22 November 1869 – 19 February 1951) was a French author and winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature (in 1947). André was born in Paris on 22 November 1869, into a middle-class Protestant family. His father was a Paris University professor of law who died in 1880, Jean Paul Guillaume Gide, and his mother was Juliette Maria Rondeaux. His uncle was the political economist Charles Gide. His paternal family traced its roots back to Italy, with his ancestors, the Guidos, moving to France and other western and northern European countries after converting to Protestantism during the 16th century, due to persecution.
    ellauri151.html on line 111: Gide was brought up in isolated conditions in Normandy and became a prolific writer at an early age, publishing his first novel, The Notebooks of André Walter (French: Les Cahiers d´André Walter), in 1891, at the age of twenty-one.
    ellauri151.html on line 113: In 1893 and 1894, Gide traveled in Northern Africa, and it was there that he came to accept his attraction to boys. (Yep, boys, he did not care for full-grown men.)
    ellauri151.html on line 115: He befriended Oscar Wilde in Paris, and in 1895 Gide and Wilde met in Algiers. Wilde had the impression that he had introduced Gide to homosexuality, but, in fact, Gide had already discovered this on his own.
    ellauri151.html on line 119: In the 1920s, Gide became an inspiration for writers such as Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre. In 1923, he published a book on Fyodor Dostoyevsky; however, when he defended homosexuality in the public edition of Corydon (1924) he received widespread condemnation. He later considered this his most important work.
    ellauri151.html on line 123: During the 1930s, he briefly became a communist, or more precisely, a fellow traveler (he never formally joined any communist party). As a distinguished writer sympathizing with the cause of communism, he was invited to speak French at Maxim Gorky´s funeral and to tour the Soviet Union as a guest of the Soviet Union of Writers. He encountered censorship of his speeches and was particularly disillusioned with the state of culture under Soviet communism, breaking with his socialist friends [who?] in Retour de L´U.R.S.S. in 1936. This is what he said of them:
    ellauri151.html on line 129: Gide was, by general consent, one of the dozen most important writers of the 20th century. Moreover, no writer of such stature had led such an interesting life, a life accessibly interesting to us as readers of his autobiographical writings, his journal, his voluminous correspondence and the testimony of others. It was the life of a man engaging not only in the business of artistic creation, but reflecting on that process in his journal, reading that work to his friends and discussing it with them; a man who knew and corresponded with all the major literary figures of his own country and with many in Germany and England; who found daily nourishment in the Latin, French, English and German classics, and, for much of his life, in the Bible; [who enjoyed playing Chopin and other classic works on the piano;] and who engaged in commenting on the moral, political and sexual questions of the day. Monsters lead an interesting li-i-fe.
    ellauri151.html on line 131: Mä luulen ezen claim to Nobel fame vuonna 1947 oli toi antikommunismi ennen kaikkea. In 1946, when Pierre Herbert asked Gide which of his books he would choose if only one were to survive," Gide replied, ´I think it would be my Journal.´" Beginning at the age of eighteen or nineteen, Gide kept a journal all of his life and when these were first made available to the public, they ran to thirteen hundred pages. Pääasiassa homoilua ja sen puolustelua. Gide ei koskaan bylsinyt vaimoaan Madeleinea, mutta kävi kerran jonkun nuoren neidon pukilla, ja siitti siinä yhden tyttären. Toista varvia ei tullut, vaikka neito pyyteli.
    ellauri151.html on line 133: In his journal, Gide distinguishes between adult-attracted "sodomites" and boy-loving "pederasts", categorizing himself as the latter.
    ellauri151.html on line 135: I call a pederast the man who, as the word indicates, falls in love with young boys. I call a sodomite ("The word is sodomite, sir," said Verlaine to the judge who asked him if it were true that he was a sodomist) the man whose desire is addressed to mature men. […] The pederasts, of whom I am one (why cannot I say this quite simply, without your immediately claiming to see a brag in my confession?), are much rarer, and the sodomites much more numerous, than I first thought. […] That such loves can spring up, that such relationships can be formed, it is not enough for me to say that this is natural; I maintain that it is good; each of the two finds exaltation, protection, a challenge in them; and I wonder whether it is for the youth or the elder man that they are more profitable.
    ellauri151.html on line 137: Wilde took a key out of his pocket and showed me into a tiny apartment of two rooms… The youths followed him, each of them wrapped in a burnous that hid his face. Then the guide left us and Wilde sent me into the further room with little Mohammed and shut himself up in the other with the [other boy]. Every time since then that I have sought after pleasure, it is the memory of that night I have pursued. […] My joy was unbounded, and I cannot imagine it greater, even if love had been added. How should there have been any question of love? How should I have allowed desire to dispose of my heart? No scruple clouded my pleasure and no remorse followed it. But what name then am I to give the rapture I felt as I clasped in my naked arms that perfect little body, so wild, so ardent, so sombrely lascivious? For a long time after Mohammed had left me, I remained in a state of passionate jubilation, and though I had already achieved pleasure five times with him, I renewed my ecstasy again and again, and when I got back to my room in the hotel, I prolonged its echoes by hand until morning. What´s love got to do with it?
    ellauri151.html on line 139: Gide´s novel Corydon, which (too) he considered his most important work, erects (niin takuulla) a defense of pederasty. At that time, the age of consent for any type of sexual activity was set at thirteen.
    ellauri151.html on line 151: The combined qualities of the realist and the idealist which Dickens possessed to a remarkable degree, together with his naturally jovial attitude toward life in general, seem to have given him a remarkably happy feeling toward Christmas, though the privations and hardships of his boyhood could have allowed him but little real experience with this day of days.
    ellauri151.html on line 152: Dickens seems to have put his whole self into these glowing little stories.
    ellauri151.html on line 154: If Scrooge be not as he has been pictured, it is because a more ducklike Scrooge was desired—a Scrooge not wholly bad, a Scrooge of a better heart, a Scrooge to whom the resurrection described in this story was possible.
    ellauri151.html on line 161: The book was a huge commercial success, quickly going through two editions. Reviews were favourable, but not all so. In an unsigned piece in The Times the reviewer opined, "We owe it to literature to protest against this last production of Mr. Dickens. Shades of Fielding and Scott! Is it for such jargon as this that we have given your throne to one who cannot estimate his eminence?" However, William Makepeace Thackeray enjoyed the book immensely: "To us, it appears it is a good Christmas book, illuminated with extra gas, crammed with extra bonbons, French plums and sweetness.This story is no more a real story than Peerybingle is a real name!
    ellauri151.html on line 197: For several years, Bridgman gained celebrity status when Charles Dickens met her during his 1842 American tour and wrote about her accomplishments in his American Notes. Her fame was short-lived, however, and she spent the remainder of her life in relative obscurity, most of it at the Perkins Institute, where she passed her time sewing and reading books in Braille. LOL
    ellauri151.html on line 242: To read a writer is for me not merely to get an idea of what he says, but to go off with him and make a train in his company.
    ellauri151.html on line 246: I wished for nothing beyond his smile, and to walk with him thus, hand in hand, along a sun warmed, flower bordered path.
    ellauri151.html on line 281: Dilthey a le premier noté l’importance d’un texte de jeunesse de Hegel et y a signalé comme une première esquisse de ce que sera plus tard «la conscience malheureuse». On sait quelle importance revient à la conscience malheureuse dans la Phénoménologie de Hegel, et plus tard encore dans la Philosophie de la Religion. Sous une forme abstraite la conscience malheureuse est la conscience de la contradiction entre la vie finie de l’homme et sa pensée de l’infini. « En pensant je m’élève à l’absolu en dépassant tout ce qui est fini, je suis donc une conscience infinie et en même temps je suis une conscience de soi finie et cela d’après toute ma détermination empirique... Les deux termes se cherchent et se fuient — je suis le sentiment, l’intuition, la représentation de cette unité et de ce conflit et la connexion de ces termes en conflit... je suis ce combat, je ne suis pas un des termes engagés dans le confit, mais je suis les deux combattants et le combat lui-même, je suis le feu et l’eau, qui entrent en contact et le contact et l’unité de ce qui absolument se fuit. » La conscience malheureuse qui dans la Phénoménologie trouve son incarnation historique dans le judaïsme et dans une partie du moyen âge chrétien est en effet la conscience de la vie comme du malheur de la vie. L’homme s’est élevé au-dessus de sa condition terrestre et mortelle ; il n’est plus que le conflit de l’infini et du fini, de l’absolu qu’il a posé en dehors de la vie, et de sa vie réduite à la finitude…
    ellauri151.html on line 368: as a motto of his critique of language (ZH 7: 169; H: xiii, n. 6). Munz
    ellauri151.html on line 410: What Tarquin the Proud said in his garden with the poppy blooms was understood by the son but not by the messenger. Wot??? Kz. albumia 153.
    ellauri151.html on line 433: A thirsty ambition for truth and virtue, and a frenzy to conquer all lies and vices which are not recognized as such nor desire to be; herein consists the heroic spirit of the philosopher. Help us translate this quote!
    ellauri151.html on line 435: The product of paper and printed ink, that we commonly call the book, is one of the great visible mediators between spirit and time, and, reflecting zeitgeist, lasts as long as ore and stone. Help us translate this quote!
    ellauri151.html on line 437: Without language we would have no reason, without reason no religion, and without these three essential aspects of our nature, neither mind nor bond of society. Help us translate this quote!
    ellauri151.html on line 441: If only I was as eloquent as Demosthenes, I would have to do no more than repeat a single word three times. Reason is language — Logos; I gnaw on this marrowbone and will gnaw myself to death over it. It is still always dark over these depths for me: I am still always awaiting an apocalyptic angel with a key to this abyss. Help us translate this quote!
    ellauri151.html on line 443: The philosophers have always given truth a bill of divorce, by separating what nature has joined together and vice versa. Help us translate this quote
    ellauri151.html on line 445: Not only the entire ability to think rests on language… but language is also the crux of the misunderstanding of reason with itself. Help us translate this quote! Arto Mustajoki, please! How would it go in Russian?
    ellauri151.html on line 451: Let us assume that we invited an unknown person to a game of cards. If this person answered us, “I don’t play,” we would either interpret this to mean that he did not understand the game, or that he had an aversion to it which arose from economic, ethical, or other reasons. Let us imagine, however, that an honorable man, who was known to possess every possible skill in the game, and who was well versed in its rules and its forbidden tricks, but who could like a game and participate in it only when it was an innocent pastime, were invited into a company of clever swindlers, who were known as good players and to whom he was equal on both scores, to join them in a game. If he said, “I do not play,” we would have to join him in looking the people with whom he was talking straight in the face, and would be able to supplement his words as follows: “I don’t play, that is, with people such as you, who break the rules of the game, and rob it of its pleasure. If you offer to play a game, our mutual agreement, then, is that we recognize the capriciousness of chance as our master; and you call the science of your nimble fingers chance, and I must accept it as such, it I will, or run the risk of insulting you or choose the shame of imitating you.” … The opinion of Socrates can be summarized in these blunt words, when he said to the Sophists, the leaned men of his time, “I know nothing.” Help! TLDR!
    ellauri151.html on line 458: Mitä tää kaikki oikein meriteeraa? Mihin kirjailija on oikein tässä pyrkinyt? What's the meaning of all this?
    ellauri151.html on line 532: Moral antitheodicies are no good because god gets flushed down the toilet if he hasn't got his finger in every pie. Well Larza doesn't say it this directly, but implies as much. And that's not good in a theology thesis. So we have to go with concptual antitheodicy, if at all.
    ellauri151.html on line 556: Johann Georg Hamann (1730–1788) is a Christian thinker who started the first linguistic turn in philosophy and the German linguistic tradition with his Metakritik of Kant’s philosophy (see Bayer 2002; Dickson 1995; Betz 2009). John
    ellauri151.html on line 558: with the ideas typically attributed to the late Wittgenstein”. In this
    ellauri151.html on line 595: In regard to their specific attitudes towards theological resolutions of the Council of Chalcedon, Christian denominations (both historical and modern) can be divided into:
    ellauri151.html on line 640: confronting Adam with his transgression.’ Now I would not for the life
    ellauri151.html on line 653: Luther puts this clearly: “The spirit consists in the use, not the object”. Luther reached his theological breakthrough when he realized that theological language consists fundamentally of speech acts and linguistic action. Augustinuxen show-and-tell semantiikka ei kata mysteerien pragmatiikkaa: ei kuivassa näkkärissä ole sielua, vaan se pujahtaa siihen joteskin kun näkki pannaan kielelle ja sanotaan oikeat taikasanat. Hizi empä arvannut poikasena kielitieteen kurssilla miten läheltä Luther siinä liippasi, hyvä ettei tukka heilahtanut.
    ellauri151.html on line 657: Wittgenstein first interprets Hamann’s ideas as a Russell-type paradox of signs and their objects in light of the logical problems he was discussing in his lectures: how God∈God? Wittgenstein then uses Kierkegaard to interpret religious symbols as paradoxes that express a higher truth. I argue that Wittgenstein
    ellauri151.html on line 684: communication as a counter-model for religious language and uses it to criticize Frazer’s attempts to debunk religion. Religious rituals must be understood as expressive communication. Magic, religion and language are based on symbolism, as the harmony of language and reality takes place in the symbol. A religious ritual like a rain-dance symbolically represents and mythologically enacts the connection between a wish and its fulfillment, and Wittgenstein mentions sacraments like baptism in this context (RF: 125). All language is similarly symbolic and ceremonial at its core and cannot be separated from mythology.
    ellauri151.html on line 705: 5. Had Jews as His audience (a couple exceptions)5. Had Gentiles as his primary audience
    ellauri151.html on line 717: the Gospels contain no Christianity. This may be shocking but it is true. Not one word of Christianity exists in the Gospels. The Gospels are all Jewish. They contain only Judaism–Jewish theology.
    ellauri151.html on line 719: Paul, however, wrote that Christians are not under the Mosaic Law; we are under the administration of Grace (Romans 6.14). These are two vastly different operating environments. Jesus ministered only to Jews. Jesus also ordered his disciples not to go to Gentiles but to go to Jews alone (Matthew 10.5-6). In Christianity, Paul went to the Gentiles as the Apostle of the Gentiles (Romans 11.13; 1 Timothy 2.7; 2 Timothy 1.11).
    ellauri151.html on line 721: Those who believed the gospel of the kingdom, that Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of God, were known as followers of the Way (Acts 9.2, 19.9, 23, 22.4, 24.14, 22). They were not Christians. Christianity did not begin within the borders of Israel; it began outside its borders. Paul was saved outside Israel on his way to Damascus (Acts 9.3-6). Believers first became known as Christians in Antioch, not Jerusalem (Acts 11.25-26).
    ellauri151.html on line 778: [9] For to this end Christ died and lived again, that he might be Lord both of the dead and of the living.
    ellauri151.html on line 788: [9] The commandments, "You shall not commit adultery, You shall not kill, You shall not steal, You shall not covet," and any other commandment, are summed up in this sentence, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
    ellauri151.html on line 793: [38] This is the great and first commandment.

    ellauri151.html on line 813: [7] In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace

    ellauri151.html on line 892: [11] And his gifts were that some should be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and teachers,

    ellauri151.html on line 894: [7] For this I was appointed a preacher and apostle (I am telling the truth, I am not lying), a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth.

    ellauri151.html on line 896: [11] For this gospel I was appointed a preacher and apostle and teacher,
    ellauri151.html on line 906: [25] Lest you be wise in your own conceits, I want you to understand this mystery, brethren: a hardening has come upon part of Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles come in,

    ellauri151.html on line 918: [11] And his gifts were that some should be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors (shepherds) and teachers,
    ellauri151.html on line 922: [16] And I have other sheep, that are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will heed my voice. So there shall be one flock, one shepherd.
    ellauri151.html on line 948: [35] The good man out of his good treasure brings forth good, and the evil man out of his evil treasure brings forth evil.

    ellauri151.html on line 950: [45] The good man out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil man out of his evil treasure produces evil; for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks.

    ellauri151.html on line 976: [13] Go and learn what this means, "I desire mercy, and not sacrifice."
    ellauri151.html on line 983: [18] for the scripture says, "You shall not muzzle an ox when it is treading out the grain," and, "The laborer deserves his wages."

    ellauri151.html on line 986: [12] If others share this rightful claim upon you, do not we still more?
    ellauri151.html on line 1038: Pidän urotekona, että vuonna 2013 luin Antony Bevorin kirjan Toinen maailmansota. Siinä on kaiken kaikkiaan 960 sivua. En tiennyt II maailmansodasta paljonkaan, koska hissantunneilla ei edes päästy siihen. Luulin, että kirjassa olisi enemmän poliittista historiaa, mutta ei: Kuvataan eri taistelut yksityiskohtaisesti. En edes tajua niistä mitään; jotkut kukkulalla, jotkut joella, siellä & täällä. Sotahistorian kirjoittajat tietysti tekevät työtään, mutta yllättävää kyllä, mun tuttavapiirissä on kaksikin ihmistä, jotka ovat kiinnostuneita just taisteluista ja niiden kulusta. Siis Suomen taisteluista. Näistä yksityiskohdista, että minkä puskan takana kukakin. En tiedä heidän kiinnostuksensa syytä. Itselle kuulostaa siltä kuin olisi tietokonepeli paperilla. Vaikka just se, minkä Calle sanoi, on oleellista. Kamalaa, kuolleita ihmisiä, kummaltakin puolelta.
    ellauri151.html on line 1043: Joo isi ei mennyt halpaan. Taisteluhistoria on penkkiurheilun eräs variaatio.
    ellauri151.html on line 1066: Halju mulkero Lucius Annaeus Seneca uses in the letter number 114, addressed to his friend Lucilius, the expression "talis hominibus fuit oratio qualis vita" (for such men their speech was like their life), warning us that this sentence was coined by the Greeks. So ist das Leben wie ein Hühnerbrett.
    ellauri151.html on line 1129: La Porte étroite est en 1909 le premier grand succès littéraire de Gide. Strait is the Gate (French: La Porte Étroite) is a 1909 French novel written by André Gide. It was translated into English by Dorothy Bussy. It probes the complexities and terrors of adolescence and growing up. Based on a Freudian interpretation, the story uses the influences of Andy's childhood experience to explain the misunderstandings that can arise between two or more people. Strait is the Gate taps the unassuaged memory of Gide's unsuccessful wooing of his cousin between 1888 and 1891.
    ellauri151.html on line 1131: Much of the story is written as an epistolary novel between the Protagonist Jerome and his love Alissa. Much of the end of the novel is taken up by an exploration into Alissa's journal that details most of the events of the novel from her perspective.
    ellauri151.html on line 1134: Each pays the price – spiritual death and anal dilatation for Michel, bodily death and who knows maybe worse for Alissa. 'Whom can I persuade that this is the twin of The Immoralist?', Andy wrote in his journal, 'that the two subjects grew up together in my mind, the excess of the one finding a secret justification in the excess of the other, so that the two together form an equipoise?'
    ellauri152.html on line 58: Ekologisesta maalaismaisesta elämänmuodosta tulee ihannoitu tilanne ja luonnosta izearvoinen luontopalvelujen tuottaja. Tämä ei tarkoita sitä että muutettaisiin maalle. Päinvastoin. Alexandriassa jouduttiin ensimmäisen kerran antiikin historiassa tekemisiin suurkaupungin ja sen mukanaan tuomien ongelmien, massaviihteen, juurettomuuden tunteen ja vieraantumisen kanssa.
    ellauri152.html on line 71: The Songs of Bilitis (/bɪˈliːtɪs/; French: Les Chansons de Bilitis) is a collection of erotic, essentially lesbian, poetry by Pierre Louÿs published in Paris in 1894. Since Louÿs claimed that he had translated the original poetry from Ancient Greek, this work is considered a pseudotranslation. Though the poems were actually clever fabulations, authored by Louÿs himself, they are still considered important literature. [by whom?]
    ellauri152.html on line 75: Louÿs claimed the 143 prose poems, excluding 3 epitaphs, were entirely the work of this ancient poet—a place where she poured both her most intimate thoughts and most pubic actions, from childhood innocence in Pamphylia to the loneliness and chagrin of her later years.
    ellauri152.html on line 79: To lend authenticity to the forgery, Louÿs in the index listed some poems as "untranslated"; he even craftily fabricated an entire section of his book called "The Life of Bilitis", crediting a certain fictional archaeologist Herr G. Heim ("Mr. C. Cret" in German) as the discoverer of Bilitis' tomb. And though Louÿs displayed great knowledge of Ancient Greek culture, ranging from children's games in "Tortie Tortue" to application of scents in "Perfumes", the literary fraud was eventually exposed. This did little, however, to taint their literary value in readers' eyes, and Louÿs' open and sympathetic celebration of lesbian sexuality earned him sensation and historic significance.
    ellauri152.html on line 81: In 1894 Louÿs, travelling in Italy with his friend Ferdinand Hérold, grandson of the composer (1791–1831) of the same name, met André Gide, who described how he had just lost his virginity to a Berber boy named Muhammed in the oasis resort-town of Biskra in Algeria; Gide urged his friends to go to Biskra and follow his example. The Songs of Bilitis are the result of Louÿs and Hérold's shared encounter with Muhammed the dancing-boy, and the poems are dedicated to Gide with a special mention to "M.b.A", Mohammad ben Atala. Ben is boy, bat is girl, Q.E.D.
    ellauri152.html on line 392: ecce ferunt Nymphae calathis; tibi candida Nais, tässä koreja joisson jotain kukkia; sulle valkee Nais-
    ellauri152.html on line 537: The name has been equated with the Persian name Omanes (Old Persian: 𐎡𐎶𐎴𐎡𐏁 Imāniš) recorded by Greek historians. Several etymologies have been proposed for it: it has been associated with the Persian word Hamayun, meaning "illustrious".
    ellauri152.html on line 543: As described in the Book of Esther, Haman was the son of Hammedatha the Agagite. After Haman was appointed the principal minister of the king Ahasuerus, all of the king's servants were required to bow down to Haman, but Mordechai refused to. Angered by this, and knowing of Mordechai's Jewish nationality, Haman convinced Ahasuerus to allow him to have all of the Jews in the Persian empire killed.
    ellauri152.html on line 545: The plot was foiled by Queen Esther, the king's recent wife, who was herself a Jew. Esther invited Haman and the king to two banquets. In the second banquet, she informed the king that Haman was plotting to kill her (and the other Jews). This enraged the king, who was further angered when (after leaving the room briefly and returning) he discovered Haman had fallen on Esther's couch, intending to beg mercy from Esther, but which the king interpreted as a sexual advance.
    ellauri152.html on line 547: On the king's orders, Haman was hanged from the 50-cubit-high gallows that had originally been built by Haman himself, on the advice of his wife Zeresh, in order to hang Mordechai. The bodies of Haman's ten sons were also hanged, after they died in battle against the Jews.The Jews also killed about 75,000 of their enemies "in self-defense."
    ellauri152.html on line 549: The apparent purpose of this unusually high gallows can be understood from the geography of Shushan: Haman's house (where the pole was located) was likely in the city of Shushan (a flat area), while the royal citadel and palace were located on a mound about 15 meters higher than the city. Such a tall pole would have allowed Haman to observe Mordechai's corpse while dining in the royal palace, had his plans worked as intended.
    ellauri152.html on line 551: In Rabbinic tradition, Haman is considered to be an archetype of evil and persecutor of the Jews. Having attempted to exterminate the Jews of Persia, and rendering himself thereby their worst enemy, Haman naturally became the center of many Talmudic legends. Being at one time extremely poor, he sold himself as a slave to Mordecai. He was a barber at Kefar Karzum for the space of twenty-two years. Haman had an idolatrous image of Esther's arse embroidered on his garments, so that those who bowed to him at command of the king bowed also to the image.
    ellauri152.html on line 555: Haman had 365 counselors, 1/day, but the advice of none was so good as that of his wife, Zeresh. She induced Haman to build a tree for Mordechai, assuring him that this was the only way in which he would be able to prevail over his enemy, for hitherto the just had always been rescued from every other kind of death. As God foresaw that Haman himself would be hanged on some tree, He asked which tree would volunteer to serve as the instrument of death. Each tree, declaring that it was used for some holy purpose, objected to being soiled by the unclean body of Haman. Only the thorn-tree could find no excuse, and therefore offered itself for a tree (Esther Rabbah 9; Midrash Abba Gorion 7 (ed. Buber, Wilna, 1886); in Targum Sheni this is narrated somewhat differently).
    ellauri152.html on line 559: Qu'ran contradicts the Bible, but is in line with Persian historical records which do not contain any reference to the biblical story of a Persian official named Haman during that time period nor the person of Esther.
    ellauri152.html on line 561: The Jewish holiday of Purim commemorates the story of the Jews' deliverance and Haman's defeat. On that day, the Book of Esther is publicly read and much noise and tumult is raised at every mention of Haman's name. A type of ratchet noisemaker called in Hebrew a ra'ashan (רעשן) (in Yiddish: "grogger" or "hamandreyer") is used to express disdain for Haman. Pastry known as hamentashen (Yiddish for 'Haman's pockets'; known in Hebrew as אזני המן ozney Haman 'Haman's ears') are traditionally eaten on this day.
    ellauri152.html on line 583: The most basic information is this: “Yentl the Yeshiva Boy” is a short story by Isaac Bashevis Singer, the famous Polish-American Jewish writer, published in 1962. It follows Yentl, a Jewish girl from a Polish shtetl who loves Torah-study, as she disguises herself as a man named Anshel in order to study at a yeshiva. Yentl (1983) is the movie-musical adaptation of the story, directed by and starring Barbra Streisand. In many ways it is a fairly faithful adaptation of the story’s events, but it has a different tone and a different ending.
    ellauri152.html on line 587: The plot goes like this: Yentl has secretly studied Torah under her father’s tutelage. She has no interest in marriage, so when he dies, she disguises herself as Anshel and travels to a yeshiva. Along the way she meets a fellow student named Avigdor. They strike up a friendship and Yentl accompanies him to his yeshiva in Bechev, where they become study partners. Avigdor is in love with a girl named Badass, whom he wishes to marry. However, when Badass’s family learns a dark secret about Avigdor’s family, they won’t let him marry her. In desperation, Avigdor begs Anshel to marry Badass in his stead. Yentl initially resists, but eventually gives in and asks for Badass’s hand in order to retain Avigdor’s goodwill. After Anshel and Badass are married, Badass comes to look on her husband with love, but Yentl become more and more upset about the situation. Unable to go on any longer, Yentl asks Avigdor to join her on a business trip. Once they are at an inn in another city, Yentl tells him that she’s a woman. He laughs and doesn’t believe her, so she undresses momentarily. He is shocked. This is where the two versions split.
    ellauri152.html on line 603: And, oh f-ck, there is so much to talk about in this section. The importance of consent here, when Yentl lets Badass know she doesn’t need to do anything she doesn’t want to, both according to her husband and according to Jewish law—that’s good, that’s meaningful. Then we even get recognition that feminism doesn’t just mean validating women who don’t want sex, but also validating women who do want sex! Badass starts to have feelings for Anshel and proposes sleeping together herself, on her own terms. The movie is not always kind to Badass—in many ways she is a stereotype for Yentl to play off of—but this is a place where Yentl‘s feminism succeeds: Badass wants to have sex, and that’s fine.
    ellauri152.html on line 605: Or it would be fine if the movie didn’t play it for laughs. The movie puts Yentl in multiple awkward situations where she has to perform verbal and physical gymnastics to keep people from seeing her without clothes, that gross classic trope whereby trans characters are outed all the time in fiction. As always, the movie drags this scene out into a whole joke, that Yentl has to scramble to prevent Badass from finding out she’s a woman because Badass wants to have sex with her, a woman, isn’t that just soooooo funny? On multiple levels, I am unamused and unhappy.
    ellauri152.html on line 613: “Miss Streisand [made] Yentl, whose greatest passion was the Torah, go on a ship to America, singing at the top of her lungs. Why would she decide to go to America? Weren’t there enough yeshivas in Poland or in Lithuania where she could continue to study? Was going to America Miss Streisand’s idea of a happy ending for Yentl? What would Yentl have done in America? Worked in a sweatshop 12 hours a day where there is no time for learning? Would she try to marry a salesman in New York, move to the Bronx or to Brooklyn and rent an apartment with an ice box and a dumbwaiter? This kitsch ending summarizes all the faults of the adaptation. It was done without any kinship to Yentl’s character, her ideals, her sacrifice, her great passion for spiritual achievement. As it is, the whole splashy production has nothing but a commercial value.”
    ellauri152.html on line 615: Now, here Singer is not mad at Yentl the film for cis-normifying his gender-ambiguous, interestingly queer Yentl, but rather for turning the ending into optimistic kitsch that ignores the harsh reality of what life in America was for Jewish immigrants, especially for Jewish women. And in some ways I feel like rolling my eyes at him for that. Aside from the fact that it offends his artistic vision, why shouldn’t Jewish women get a film where—suspension of disbelief!—a Jew will study Torah, loudly and proudly, as a woman? It’s a musical, not a documentary.
    ellauri152.html on line 619: The ending of Yentl is just supremely disappointing compared to the unapologetic ending of Yeshiva Boy. “I’ll live out my time as I am,” Anshel says in the story—and Anshel is the name she is referred to as in this passage, even while also referred to as a woman and with she/her pronouns. Yentl the Yeshiva Boy often engages in this mixing of gender signifiers—it’s in the very title, which pairs the traditionally feminine name “Yentl” with the clashing term “boy,” letting them jostle each other to create dissonance and ambiguity. The terms not matching is their meaning. This is how Anshel is. A woman with a man’s soul, a man with she/her pronouns, a person with two names. It’s not couched in easily understandable modern terms, but no one who has heard of these modern terms would read Yentl as a cis woman playing dress up. It’s different than that. Queerer than that.
    ellauri152.html on line 621: This genderqueerness is the simple fact of Yentl’s character in Yeshiva Boy, but totally painted over in Yentl.
    ellauri152.html on line 626: I’d never heard of this story before, but all the thoughts you had are so interesting! I totally get your frustrations about the movie changing a pivotal scene to make it more “romantic and dramatic” though – why can’t movies just appreciate subtlety and friendship sometimes?
    ellauri152.html on line 630: That is actually much the same reason why I hate that infamous scene in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire so much, when Dumbledore confronts Harry about putting his name in. One of the worst decisions in adaptation history!
    ellauri152.html on line 642: Because of this difference of opinion, Hasidim generally put on Rabbeinu Tam Tefillin after removing their regular "Rashi" Tefillin.
    ellauri152.html on line 656: The dog originally created the world to run through strict judgment, din. However, since the dog knew that the world could not endure such harsh conditions, He decided to incorporate the spiritual energies of compassion too, as the verse states, "These are the products of the heaven and earth when they were created in the day that Hashem's (i.e. the dog's denoting kindness and mercy, not the dog's denoting strict justice) din made earth and heaven." (Bereishit 2:4) According to the original creation plan a person would be judged strictly on his own merits. There would be no bending of the rules; no concept of leniency; no looking the other way or giving another chance. Strict justice would dictate that a person be severely punished for even the "slightest" infraction of the dog's willy.
    ellauri152.html on line 662: In a world where din, justice is tempered with cheese, compassion, the average person has the opportunity to come close to the dog. Although the average person must still try his best to stand up to evil and adhere to the dog's willy, the dog views his inevitable lapses through the prism of compassion. In His love for us, He overlooks our shortcomings.
    ellauri152.html on line 666: But although the dog created this alternate system of din, justice tempered with cheese, compassion, the original system of pure, untempered justice is still available -- for those rare and powerful individuals who are able to confront the Evil Urge without the dog's assistance.
    ellauri152.html on line 668: These rare individuals are capable of adhering to the dog's willy despite the unrelenting trials, afflictions, and massive assaults hurled at them from the forces of evil. The patriarchs were such exceptional individuals, they followed this path, unassisted by the dog, as the verse says, "He Yaakov said, 'O dog the name of Hashem containing the spiritual energies of harshness before Whom my forefathers Avraham and Yitzchak walked ...
    ellauri152.html on line 671: Rebbe Nachem explains that in this path of unassisted greatness, whatever these spiritual giants attained or accomplished was through the power of their prayers. If they didn't bark and whine for their needs, the dog wouldn't provide for them. As a result, they were always completely connected with their realtor.
    ellauri152.html on line 673: Since the great Tadzikim throughout history were living on the level of din, strict justice, they realized that suffering was beneficial, enhancing their spiritual standing and bringing them close to the dog.
    ellauri152.html on line 675: "Whomever the dog loves, he chastens to let him know how to straighten his way. (Mezudat David)" (Mishlei 3:12). One is chastened by the dog so that no trace of sin remains lest it lessen the dog's love for that person, and it also increases one's humility, lest tranquility decrease one's fear of him. (Rabbenu Yona).
    ellauri152.html on line 677: According to the Medrash, Moshe knew that in the future, the Romans would shred Rabbi Akiva's flesh with iron combs for the crime of disseminating Torah. He asked the dog, "This is the Torah, and this is its reward?" the dog retorted, "Silence! For this came up upon my thoughts."
    ellauri152.html on line 679: Although the answer appears strange, we can understand it in light of what we just learned. Rabbi Akiva was a spiritual giant. He succeeded in serving the dog unassisted, while withstanding incredible afflictions, tests, and obstacles. He was able to break the forces of evil without the dog's assistance. Only through performing the dog's willy, despite his immense suffering, was Rabbi Akiva able to attain such a lofty spiritual level, the level of the dog's "first thought," so to speak, where the world would be conducted through strict justice, din. Rabbi Akiva was able to unify his soul with the dog's first thought. Therefore the dog's retort to Moshe can be understood as: "'Silence' which is the level of thought, for thoughts are silent, Rebbe Akiva reached the lofty spiritual level of the dog's thought."For this came up upon my thought," the first thought that occurred to the dog, to create the world through harshness, so those people who are able to come close to me (the dog) without my assistance and mercy could reach that highest level.
    ellauri152.html on line 681: We know that anything we do in this world produces spiritual energies that are stored in the upper worlds and last for eternity. These stored spiritual energies can be accessed even centuries after the act was performed. And, like a spiritual "radio receiver," Tefillin help us access such spiritual energies to nourish our souls, bringing us closer to the Almighty. Don't they look like radio receivers even?
    ellauri152.html on line 685: In Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin, the paragraph "And if you listen ..." (Devarim 11:13:21), which warns of the consequences of violating the dog's willy, din, harsh justice, precede the paragraph of "Hear O Israel ..." (Devarim 6:4-8), which declares our belief in the Almighty. Since this verse applies to even the sinners of Israel, it alludes to the dog's attribute of compassion, cheese. In Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin, the aspect of harshness, din, precedes that of mercy, cheese, alluding to the dog's original intention to run the world through harshness, din.
    ellauri152.html on line 687: In Rashi's Tefillin, however, the paragraph of compassion precedes the paragraph of harshness. This alludes to the way the dog presently runs the world - with compassion. Since most people are dependent on the dog's compassion for their very existence, the halacha is according to Rashi's view. Therefore, the obligation to wear Tefillin is fulfilled through donning Rashi's Tefillin. They're like basic earplugs.
    ellauri152.html on line 689: Through wearing Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin (in addition to Rashi's Tefillin) we draw awesome spiritual energies from the spiritual giants of the past, heroes who were able to neutralize afflictions, barriers, and harshness at their root, without the assistance of the dog's mercy. For this reason, Rebbe Nachem urged anyone who truly desires to come close to the dog to wear Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin in addition to Rashi's Tefillin.
    ellauri152.html on line 700: This appears to be a contradiction. On one hand, according to Pirkko Avot the dog desires boldness. On the other hand, the verse in Mishlei implies that the dog detests bold behavior!
    ellauri152.html on line 704: Since it is impossible for a human being to always know the proper response for each situation, we live with doubt. This is reflected in our wearing Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin in addition to Rashi's Tefillin, since we wear them due to a doubt. The positive spiritual energies they access to counter this doubt rectify any situations of doubt that a person may encounter. As mentioned above, Rashi's Tefillin contain the spiritual energies of compassion and Rabbeinu Tam's the spiritual energies of harshness. Through wearing both Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin, we nourish our minds with the spiritual energies of compassion and holy harshness. These two energies (when combined with the spiritual energies that cover all doubt mentioned above) enable us to intuitively determine how to respond appropriately in every situation, whether it means acting tough or being gentle. (Lekutei Halachoth: Orach Chaim: Hilchoth Tefillin 6:16)
    ellauri152.html on line 716: Singerin isä pimittää nälkäiseltä perheeltään 30mk kirjansa etumaxuxi. Se kieltää Iisakkia kertomasta äidille koska tämä rähisisi.
    ellauri152.html on line 735: Onko Jentl täti transvestiitti kuten Barbra Streisand? Ei kai, vain lapsionneton. Maho. Onko apinan elämä arvokkaampi kuin kärpäsen tai madon? Mixi olisi? Reb Josef säntää sisään ja ulos huoneista ja rähisee.
    ellauri152.html on line 741: Isaac Leib Peretz (Polish: Icchok Lejbusz Perec, Yiddish: יצחק־לייבוש פרץ‎) (May 18, 1852 – April 3, 1915), also sometimes written Yitskhok Leybush Peretz was a Yiddish language author and playwright from Poland. Payson R. Stevens, Charles M. Levine, and Sol Steinmetz count him with Mendele Mokher Seforim and Sholem Aleichem as one of the three great classical Yiddish writers. Sol Liptzin wrote: "Yitzkhok Leibush Peretz was the great awakener of Yiddish-speaking Jewry and Sholom Aleichem its comforter.... Peretz aroused in his readers the will for self-emancipation, the will for resistance against the many humiliations to which they were being subjected."
    ellauri152.html on line 749: When Zeiltin turned 15, his father died and he decided to become a Hebrew teacher. His exit from the world of the Yeshiva exposed him to the works of the scholars of the Enlightenment. He began studying in earnest the works of both Jewish philosophers (Maimonides, Gersonides, Spinoza etc.) and non-Jewish ones such as Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and others. During this period in his life, he began questioning his religious beliefs and eventually drifted toward secularism.
    ellauri152.html on line 751: After World War I, Zeitlin gradually returned to tradition and began leading an Orthodox lifestyle. The reason(s) for this drastic change in his life is not completely clear but may have had something to do with the suffering of Jews during the war. In any case, he shifted from a tragic philosophical outlook to a mystical and spiritual viewpoint.
    ellauri152.html on line 753: He considered the core of Hasidim to consist of three "loves": love of God, of Torah, and of Israel. Just as his intended audience consisted of assimilated Jews and non-Jews, he adopted novel formulations of these loves: "love of Torah" would come to encompass inspiring works of "secular" art and literature, while "love of Israel" would be transformed into "love of humanity" (despite which Israel would still be recognized as the "firstborn child of God"). Zeitlin's religious ideal also contained a socialist element: the Hasidim he pictured would refuse to take advantage of workers.
    ellauri152.html on line 756: When the Nazis began the genocide of Jewish People in Poland in 1942, Zeitlin was 71 years old. He was murdered by Nazis in the Warsaw ghetto while holding a book of the Zohar and wrapped in a Tallit and Tefillin. Most of his family was also murdered; the only survivor was his elder son Aaron, who had settled in New York in 1939.
    ellauri153.html on line 216: Daniel Seeker on kuljexiva dervissi ja menneisyyden ym. aikojen elinkautinen opiskelija, Se huomasi että se on tehty tahrattomasta ja ajattomasta tietoisuudesta kun se mietiskeli sitä erakkomajassaan Gotlannin saarella. (Siis joku vitun svedu?) Sen kirjoituxet on enimmäxeen tän havainnon peilailua. Daniel opiskelee nyttemmin historiaa, filosofiaa, egyptologiaa ja läntistä esoteerisyyttä Uppsalan yliopistossa. Se kirjoittaa paraikaa hukin tutkielmaa hissassa ja tutkii miten buddhalaiset ja hindu textit käännettiin ekan kerran kunnolla ja tuotiin länsimaihin myöhään 18. ja 19. vuosisadalla.
    ellauri153.html on line 234: Saadi is recognized for the quality of his writings and for the depth of his social and moral thoughts. YÄK! Siltä sen törinät just kuulostaa.
    ellauri153.html on line 241: Saadi was a Sunni Muslim. Arvasin. Ne on mumslimeista pölkkypäisimpiä. Saadi Shirazi whose family were from religious scholars, missed his father when he was a child. Then he was under the guardianship of his maternal grandmother. Siis mammanpoikia.
    ellauri153.html on line 242: After leaving Shiraz he enrolled at the Nizamiyya University in Baghdad, where he studied Islamic sciences, law, governance, history, Persian literature, and Islamic theology; it appears that he had a scholarship to study there.
    ellauri153.html on line 249: For twenty years or more, he continued the same schedule of preaching, advising, and learning, honing his sermons to reflect the wisdom and foibles of his people. Toisto tyylikeinona kuten Esa "Emeritus" Saarisella.
    ellauri153.html on line 252: Saadi mourned in his poetry the fall of the ISIS Caliphate and Baghdad's destruction by U.S. invaders led by Bad Bush in February 2003.
    ellauri153.html on line 256: During the Iraq War, at least 189,000 people died directly from the war. This does not include the hundreds of thousands who died due to war-related hardships. Morocco offered the United States 2,000 monkeys trained in detonating land mines during the Iraq War. In 2002, the US government estimated that the Iraq War would cost $50-60 billion.
    ellauri153.html on line 258: When he reappeared in his native Shiraz, he crawled under Atabak Abubakr ibn Sa'd ibn Zangi (1231–60), the Salghurid ruler of Fars, who was enjoying an era of relative tranquility. Saadi was not only welcomed to the city but was shown great respect by the ruler and held to be among the great celebs of the province. Some of Saadi's most famous panegyrics were composed as a gesture of gratitude in praise of the ruling house and placed at the beginning of his Bustan. The remainder of Saadi's life seems to have been spent in Shiraz.
    ellauri153.html on line 265: Tushkin Pushkin quotes Saadi in his work Eugene Onegin, "as Saadi sang in earlier ages, 'some are far distant, some are dead'. Good point.
    ellauri153.html on line 267: to some translated editions himself. Emerson, who read Saadi only in translation, compared his writing to the Bible in terms of its wisdom and the beauty of its narrative. Justiinsa niin. Ralph oli taitava kääntäjä English-American suunnassa.
    ellauri153.html on line 269: Voltaire was very thrilled with his works especially Gulistan, even he enjoyed being called "Saadi" in his friends' circle. April 21 is The World Saadi Day.
    ellauri153.html on line 274: Tarquiniuksen piirittäessä Ardean kaupunkia kerrotaan sattuneen tapaus, jonka vuoksi hänet karkotettiin kuninkaan istuimelta. Kun muutamat kuninkaan miehistä olivat hänen poikansa Sextuksen luona, johtui puhe heidän vaimoihinsa, ja he rupesivat kiistelemään, kuka heistä olisi kiitettävin. Eräs läsnäolijoista, Kollatinus, sanoi: "No hyvä, nouskaamme ratsujemme selkään ja lähtekäämme katsomaan vaimojamme. Miehen äkkiarvaamaton tulo on kyllä hyvä koetuskeino." Ehdotus miellytti, ja kiireesti lähdettiin Roomaan. Havaittiin, että kuninkaan poikien vaimot viettivät juhlien ja pitojen täyttämää elämää. Sitten he menivät Kollatianin kaupunkiin, jossa huomattiin Kollatinuksen vaimon Lucretian vielä myöhään yöllä istuvan palvelustyttöjensä keskellä villoja kehräämässä. Kunniapalkinto määrättiinkin hänelle.
    ellauri153.html on line 282: Estääkseen lisää dynastisia kiistoja Servius meni naimisiin tyttäriensä, jotka tunnetaan historian Tullia majorina ja Tullia minorina, tulevan kuninkaan Lucius Tarquinius Superbuksen ja veljensä Arrunsin kanssaf. Yksi Tarquinin siskoista, Tarquinia, meni naimisiin Marcus Junius Brutuksen kanssa ja oli Lucius Junius Brutuksen äiti, yksi miehistä, jotka myöhemmin johtivat Rooman kuningaskunnan kaatamista. Vanhempi sisar, Tullia Major, oli lievä, mutta meni naimisiin kunnianhimoisen Tarquinin kanssa. hänen nuorempi sisarensa Tullia minor oli raivokkaampi, mutta hänen miehensä Arruns ei ollut. Hiän tuli halveksimaan häntä ja juonitteli Tarquinin kanssa Tullia majorin ja Arrunsin kuoleman aikaansaamiseksi. Puolisoidensa murhan jälkeen Tarquin ja Tullia menivät naimisiin. Yhdessä heillä oli kolme poikaa: Titus, Arruns ja Sextus, ja tytär Tarquinia, joka meni naimisiin Octavius Mamiliuksen, kikhernekauppiaan kesämmökkikunnan Tusculumin prinssin kanssa. Kun sana tästä röyhkeästä teosta levisi Sergiukseen, hän kiirehti curiaan kohtaamaan Tarquinin, joka esitti samat syytökset appiukkoaan vastaan, ja sitten nuoruudessaan ja tarmossaan kantoi kuninkaan ulos ja heitti hänet senaatin talon portaille kadulle. Kuninkaan palvelijat pakenivat, ja kun hän lähti, hämmentyneenä ja vartioimattomana, kohti palatsia, Tarquinin salamurhaajat hyökkäsivät ja murhasivat ikääntyneen Sertiuksen, ehkä oman tyttärensä neuvosta.
    ellauri153.html on line 284: Tullia puolestaan ajoi vaunuillaan senaattitaloon, jossa hän oli ensimmäinen, joka tervehti miestään kuninkaana. Mutta Tarquin pahoitti paluunsa kotiin, - huolestuneena siitä, että väkijoukko saattaisi tehdä hänen väkivaltaisuutensa. Kun hän ajoi kohti Urbian-kukkulaa, hänen kuljettajansa pysähtyi yhtäkkiä kauhistuneena nähdessään kuninkaan ruumiin makaamassa kadulla. Mutta raivoissaan Tullia itse tarttui ohjaksiin ja ajoi vaunujensa pyörät isänsä ruumiin yli. Kuninkaan veri roiskui vaunuja vasten ja värjäsi Tullian vaatteet, niin että hän toi hirvittävän jäänteen murhasta takaisin kotiinsa. Katu, jolla Tullia häpäisi isin, kuolleen kuninkaan, tuli myöhemmin tunnetuksi Vicus Sceleratuksena, rikoksen katuna.
    ellauri153.html on line 292: Isän vastauxesta alkoi meemi, joka tunnetaan nimellä "pitkä unikon oireyhtymä" eli "Jantelagen", jossa epätavallisia ansioita omaavia henkilöitä vastaan asiattomasti hyökätään tai paheksutaan saavutustensa vuoksi. Se saa nimensä Livyn jaksosta, jossa Tarquinin sanotaan ohjeistaneen poikaansa Sextusta heikentämään Gabi Sandun kaupunkia tuhoamalla sen johtavat miehet. Herodotuksesta, jonka historiassa on samanlainen tarina, jossa on mukana vehnän korvat unikon sijasta, on ehkä lainattu aihe, jossa käytetään tahatonta sanansaattajaa tällaisen viestin toimittamiseen metaforan kautta, jossa päät katkaistaan korkeimpien unikkojen leikkaamisesta. Kierkegaardin pelossa ja vapinassa on kohta Livyn versiosta tarinasta. Fear and termbling on vitun suosittua Raamatussa, sitä löytyy sieltä kokonaista 19 sivua. Fear and loathing in Las Vegas raportoi E.Saarisen ihannoima gonzo-kirjailija. Nää on vahvoja meemejä.
    ellauri153.html on line 329: proceed from the actions of chaotic forces that are opposed to God’s plans and the world order. Mani rules. Dog is just another player behind the board, with opposing forces not under his control.
    ellauri153.html on line 347:

  • If the situation is (question Job, disaster), then Job moves. He can either play (question God) or (⌐question God). If Job plays (⌐question God), he loses as he does not seek justice for the evil (disaster). Wot? Where is this in the rulebook? Wouldn't it be best for Dog if Job didn't pester him? L would lose the bet. Or why not blame Moby Dick instead! Seems we are inventing rules here as we go along. Vähän tällästä lassipalloa. If Job plays (question), he curses creation and attempts to be like God, putting the evil (challenge) into play.
    ellauri153.html on line 356:
    1. “God is good” is true at game history w if and only if God wins G if and only if Job wins G if and
      ellauri153.html on line 358:
    2. “God is omnipotent” is true at game history w if and only if God has a winning strategy in the justice-of-God game G. Tässähän se tapahtuu se suuri lässähdys. Muka omnipotentti jumala saa häthätää saatanasta matin loppupeleissä. Matkan varrella isokyrpäinen valas voi syödä vaikka kaikki sen nappulat paizi kurkon, joka jää viimeisenä laudalle. Aika lohduttavaa sen muulle tiimille. One can make a few clarifying remarks about the structure of the game. The form of the game is relatively simple: it’s an ordinary extended-form perfect information game. tuskinpa Jobilla oli täydellistä informaatiota pelitilanteesta tai edes pelin säännöistä, muista pelaajista puhumattakaan. Aika isoja informaatiojoukkoja oli niiden kalloissa. Sitäpaizi ei luonnossa pelaajat siirrä vuoronperään, vaan koko ajan, niinkuin differentiaalipeleissä. . The goal is here not to go deeply into technical details, but to construct an übersichtlich representation for the theological grammar of biblical stories and to highlight the uses of terms like “good” and “omnipotent” in them. The game or model can then be used as a simplified fragment that can be projected onto, contrasted with and used to interpret biblical stories. The point of this clarification is to highlight the grammar of the divine properties “good” and “omnipotent” within the logic of the struggle myth, and to get the consistency of {God is good, God is omnipotent, There is chaotic evil} as in the Book of Job. The argument needs two assumptions. First, the games between God, humans and creation are genuine dialogues. Paskanmarjat, ei nää ole edes mitään signaling gameja, puhumattakaan dialogipeleistä. Olis kannattanut lukea mun väitöskirja Dialogue Games, siinä on oikeeta sananvaihtoa. The players answer each other and thus have to take turns in making moves and participating in them. Then the game of Job and the struggle against chaos is in extended form to represent the sequence of the debate, and its resolution gives the drama of the fight against kid chaos. Second, the properties of God like “omnipotent” and “good” are defined against the background of Job’s encounter with God and the struggle against chaos. This redefinition builds on both James’ reinterpretation of the properties of God in terms of religious practices, and also of Job’s new world of faith in the encounter. Job’s encounter with God and the struggle against chaos are modelled in the game, so such properties of God as “good” and “omnipotent” are then internal to the game. Missä kohtaa Jopilla on tässä jotain pelivaraa? Montako valintaruutua Jobilla edes on: Marise-älä marise, ja Pyllistä-älä pyllistä. Siinä kaikki. Jotta jumalan tiimi voittaisi, sen pitää ensin marista ja sit pyllistää. Nain on meidankin elamassamme! Marise mitä mariset, mut muista pyllistää!
      ellauri153.html on line 369: pointless, and there is no history H in G s.t. the good is achieved.
      ellauri153.html on line 384: happiness. Eli joo syyttele vaan pahaa pikku cheefiä Moby Duckia, ei jumala sille mitään voi vaikka loikin sen ja on sen iso cheefi. Vitun tunari, mixet suunnitellut pelilautaa paremmin? Siis meidän kannalta ja vähän izesikin. Job’s evil (challenge) is tragic, as his quest for justice ends up challenging creation as a
      ellauri153.html on line 388: “There is pointless evil” is true at game history w if and only if there is an evil s is at play in w, and
      ellauri153.html on line 393: informed and sophisticated theodicies of Plantinga and van Inwagen. These theodicies take the
      ellauri153.html on line 408: greater good for w. Sure. Funny how everybody still clings to this measly earthly life to the last, given the joys that await them in the clouds. Then the Incarnation and the Gospel stories discussed in Ch. 6.3.1 are God’s
      ellauri153.html on line 420: words “God”, “good” and “omnipotent”. This leads to confusions, as sufficient reasons for divine
      ellauri153.html on line 421: action must be independently determined on this model. Second, the use of God’s plans and the
      ellauri153.html on line 431: Proposition: “God is good” and “God is omnipotent” are true in all histories of G.
      ellauri153.html on line 447: Thus “God is good” and “God is omnipotent” are true at all histories w of the game G.□
      ellauri153.html on line 495: alternative to this approach is to study the quest for meaning in our everyday, religious, scientific,
      ellauri153.html on line 554: Now that the problem of evil has been exposed as a conceptual confusion, the way is clear for a Jamesian science of religions and worldviews. The methods of grammatical description can be extended to the practices and ways of sense-making in different worldviews: how they give meaning to moral practices and how do they approach the intelligibility of the world? What practical responses do they have for coping with evil? For example, the grammar of seeing-as for models and metaphors can be applied to the metaphors in the Hebrew Bible for God’s activity to understand what it is to see the world as God’s creation. The grammar of virtues can be used to describe Buddhist practices and explore, how these approaches contribute to the human good. Similar approaches can be taken to secular worldviews as well. These descriptions can then be used to assess the worldviews through dialogical encounters between them. However, one thing should be clear. There is no point in devaluing the world by arguing for the meaninglessness of life or atheism on the basis of evil, or in giving justifications for evils that can stand in the way of divine or human meliorist projects of fighting for justice. To paraphrase the judgment of the Divine Judge in the Book of Job, such approaches are not even wrong. They are as meaningless as life itself.


      ellauri153.html on line 675: 2 Kaikki oli saanut alkunsa Nabobista. Hän oli toiminut tapansa mukaan julmasti ja röyhkeästi. Tällä kertaa hän oli kuitenkin loukannut väärää miestä – uskollisten ja harjaantuneiden Israelin armeijan sotilaiden rakastettua päällikköä. Nyt yksi Nabobin nuorista työmiehistä, kenties taimen, tuli kertomaan asiasta Abigailille luottaen siihen, että tämä keksisi keinon heidän pelastamisekseen. Mutta mitä yksi nainen mahtaisi kokonaiselle armeijalle?
      ellauri153.html on line 810: When King David was very old, he could not keep warm even when they put covers over him. So his attendants said to him, ‘Let us look for a young virgin to serve the king and take care of him. She can lie beside him so that our lord the king may keep warm.’ Then they searched throughout Israel for a beautiful young woman and found Abishag, a Shunammite, and brought her to the king. The woman was very beautiful; she took care of the king and waited on him, but the king had no sexual relations with her” (1 Kings 1:1–4)
      ellauri153.html on line 814: Even with extra blankets, the elderly King David could not generate enough body heat on his own to maintain a healthy temperature. A lifetime that had included being a fugitive, living in caves, being exposed to the elements, and fighting hard-fought battles had finally taken its toll on his aging body (see 1 Samuel 20:1; 22:1; 2 Samuel 21:17). David’s condition, called hypothermia, is not unusual in older people: toward the end of his long life, former President Ronald Reagan requested that his favorite electric blanket be returned from the ranch he had sold. Of course, no technology in ancient Israel would provide a continual source of warmth through the cool Judean nights. Only a human body had the capacity to do that.
      ellauri153.html on line 816: David had four wives whose names we know—Ahinoam, Abigail (2 Samuel 2:2), Eglah (2 Samuel 3:5), and Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11:27)—and possibly others such as Absalom’s mother Maakah. This doesn’t count the concubines he had (2 Samuel 5:13). The natural question is, with plenty of female intimates to keep David warm, why did his attendants seek out a beautiful virgin stranger for the job? The following are several issues regarding Abishag’s “job description”:
      ellauri153.html on line 819:
    3. Why a young virgin? This quality ensured that whoever was chosen for the job wouldn’t be taken away from a jealous fiancé or husband, nor would she be a widow familiar with the sexual practices of the marriage bed. We don’t know what hopes and dreams Abishag had for her own life, but in the ancient world where uncertainty and struggle were lifelong challenges for most people, the honor of being brought into the king’s household would mean a lifetime of well-being and security for her and her family (1 Kings 4:27).
      ellauri153.html on line 820:
    4. Why beautiful? Human nature never changes. Then as now, people prized physical beauty (Genesis 29:17; Deuteronomy 21:11; 1 Samuel 9:2; 2 Samuel 14:25; Esther 2:2–4). Kings had the privilege and power to surround themselves with beauty, and David’s servants likely thought to win his favor by bringing a beautiful woman into his palace.
      ellauri153.html on line 822:
    5. Why not a concubine? Though concubines had a lesser status than wives, they, too, possessed a certain rank and dignity. Abishai fortunately had neither. Absalom demonstrated this fact when, as part of his attempted coup, he slept with his father’s concubines (2 Samuel 16:21–22). Moreover, the personal dynamics within harems were infamous for the jealousy and infighting they engendered. To select one wife or concubine over another would be a mark of favoritism that would likely incite resentment and squabbling in the household. Don't even try this at home!
      ellauri153.html on line 824: Abishag was neither a wife nor a concubine, but her position in the king’s household gave her such high prestige that David’s son Adonijah asked to marry her after the king’s death, but Solomon recognized this as an attempt by Adonijah to make himself king, and he had his brother summarily executed (1 Kings 2:21–25).
      ellauri153.html on line 826: Nowhere does the Bible approve of David’s state of affairs—just the opposite! God had warned Israel through Moses that any future king “must not take many wives” (Deuteronomy 17:17). Scripture does not say that Abishag’s presence in David’s bed was a good thing, nor does it present David as a good father. His many children by multiple mothers were a cause of great trouble for him and the whole kingdom (2 Samuel 13; 2 Samuel 15; 1 Kings 12:23–25). His own son and successor, Solomon, ignoring God’s clear warning, took his father’s excesses to a shocking extreme with 700 wives and 300 concubines who led him astray and turned his heart after other gods (1 Kings 11:2–4). The kingdom itself was divided and lost by Solomon’s son shortly after his coronation, barely one generation after the glory of King David (1 Kings 12).
      ellauri153.html on line 849: Conceivably, the contrasts form some kind of semantic unit. This may be a unit as broadly defined as positive versus negative, with alive and daring being positive and sad and insecure being negative. Titi-uu. Big surprise? Loud and sharp vs. quiet and mumbling. No wonder Bob Cohen was not very memorable as a linguist. He was rather like Reb Berelen. He too was a well-known parasite.
      ellauri153.html on line 854: Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde is an elaboration on the classical Principle of Sufficient Reason, written by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer as his Jena doctoral dissertation in 1813. The principle of sufficient reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason or cause.
      ellauri153.html on line 861: For Hegel, Napoleon as a world-historic figure is fulfilling a destiny, he is the bloodthirsty vessel with which history and the Geist unfold itself. For Schopenhauer, Napoleon is just one more bloodthirsty conqueror in a long line of bloodthirsty conquerors without a special purpose. He is not special because he is just as egoistic and ambitious as the rest of mankind (except Arttu). Hegel saw N. on the way up, Sope on his way down.
      ellauri153.html on line 863: After submitting it as his doctoral dissertation Arttu was awarded a PhD from the University of Jena in absentia. Private publication soon followed. "There were three reviews of it, commending it condescendingly. Scarcely more than one hundred copies were sold, the rest was remaindered and, a few years later, pulped."[1] Among the reasons for the cold reception of this original version are that it lacked the author´s later authoritative style and appeared decidedly unclear in its implications. A copy was sent to Goethe who responded by inviting the author to his home on a regular basis, ostensibly to discuss philosophy but in reality to recruit the young philosopher into work on his Theory of Colors.
      ellauri153.html on line 865: Schopenhauer’s central proposition is the main idea of his entire philosophy, he states simply as “The world is my representation.” Typerys.
      ellauri153.html on line 866: Ne sen riittävän syyn periaatteen 4 juurikasta oli becoming, being, knowing, willing. In his Translator's Introduction to Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation, E. F. J. Payne concisely summarized the Fourfold Root:
      ellauri153.html on line 868: Our knowing consciousness is divisible solely into subject and object. To be object for the subject and to be our representation or mental picture are one and the same. All our representations are objects for the subject, and all objects of the subject are our representations. These stand to one another in a regulated connection which in form is determinable a priori, and by virtue of this connection nothing existing by itself and independent, nothing single and detached, can become an object for us. The first aspect of this principle is that of becoming, where it appears as the law of causality and is applicable only to changes. Thus if the cause is given, the effect must of necessity follow. The second aspect deals with concepts or abstract representations, which are themselves drawn from representations of intuitive perception, and here the principle of sufficient reason states that, if certain premises are given, the conclusion must follow. The third aspect of the principle is concerned with being in space and time, and shows that the existence of one relation inevitably implies the other, thus that the equality of the angles of a triangle necessarily implies the equality of its sides and vice versa. Finally, the fourth aspect deals with actions, and the principle appears as the law of motivation, which states that a definite course of action inevitably ensues on a given character and motive.
      ellauri155.html on line 34:
      Ne, jotka tuntevat historiaa tietävät, että eräs edustaja nimeltään Veikko Vennamo kannettiin vahtimestarien toimesta ulos salista tämän vastustelusta huolimatta. Kyllä kansa tietää!

      ellauri155.html on line 179: mezähallitus, nykyhallitus, sateenkaarihallitus, kirkkohallitus, pakolaishallitus, huoneenhallitus, home rule, valtuusto, johtoporras, virkakoneisto, liittoneuvosto, neuvostoliitto, synodi, sanhedrin, johtoryhmä, johtokunta, tuomiokapituli, esikunta, staabi, konsistori, konsiili, kolleegio, keskuskomitea, duuma, raastupa, hovioikeus, etuoikeus, tuomioistuin, etuistuin, valtaistuin, wc-istuin, heittoistuin, valaistuin, karaistuin, veltostuin, jäykistyin, korkein oikeus, vahvimman oikeus, parlamentti, edustajainhuone, miesten talo, miestenhuone, kerho, klubi, kongressi, valtiopäivät, senaatti, opetuslautakunta, kuzuntalautakunta, valintalautakunta, valiokunta, eläinkilpailujen antidopingtoimikunta, humanistinen toimikunta, tutkimuxen eettinen toimikunta, vaalitoimikunta, tuomaristo, valamiehistö, neuvottelukunta, res publica, agorafobia
      ellauri155.html on line 181: Tutkimusyxikkö, voimakaxikko, konnakolmikko, triumviraatti, Viisikko, torviseizikko, aloituskymmenikkö, likainen tusina, Duodecim, septuaginta, ryhmä, jaos, osasto, patteri, konttori, puolijoukkue, kakkosmiehistö, komppania, pataljoona, Rajamäen rykmentti, prikaati, divisioona, kunnialegioona, asunto-osakeyhtiö, kommandiittiyhtiö, yhdistys, seura, seurakunta, yritys, konserni, organisaatio, huippuyliopisto, laitos, instituutti, hotelli, mullibordelli, härdelli, hourula, lauma, parvi, eskadroona, eskaaderi, kaaderi, henkilökunta, staff, miehistö, yhtye, bändi, kimppa, luokka, piiri, jengi, veikkausporukka, lähetystö, konsulaatti, linna, vankila, heimo, kansa, homoliitto, ydinperhe, suku, el pueblo unido, avanti poppolo, rotu, puolue, suku, klaani, valtio, partio, lippukunta, isänmaa
      ellauri155.html on line 329: Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982:


      ellauri155.html on line 354: Dear Henry - I've noticed how many people have put up their Christmas trees and decorations early this year including myself. I had all ready decided that I will sing carols loudly and celebrate Christmas to the nth degree not only for fun but also as an act of defiance. Merry Christmas everyone!!!!! Happy New Year!!!!! Yahoo!!!! Tweet!!!!
      ellauri155.html on line 367: While the United States faces the greatest immigration crisis in its history, the department of Customs and Border Protection is forcing Border Patrol agents and other staff to undergo “unconscious bias” training, according to reports.
      ellauri155.html on line 375: Earlier this year, the conduct of border patrol agents came into focus when the media and the Biden administration hyped up hysteria over photos appearing to show Haitian migrants being whipped by agents with horse reins.
      ellauri155.html on line 434: När Abraham kom till Gerar talade han om sin hustru Sara som sin syster och en historia snarlik den som enligt kapitel 12 utspelat sig i Egypten beskrivs: Avimelek fattade tycke för Sara och hämtade henne till sig. Gud ingrep och anklagade Avimelek för att ha tagit en annan mans hustru. Abraham ställdes till svars och det hela klarades ut. Abraham ingick senare ett förbund med Avimelek på en plats som därmed fick namnet Be'er Sheva (באר שבע, "edsbrunnen").
      ellauri155.html on line 448: Elimelech Weisblum of Lizhensk (1717–March 11, 1787) was a rabbi and one of the great founding Rebbes of the Hasidic movement. He was known after his hometown, Leżajsk (Yiddish: ליזשענסק‎, romanized: Lizhensk) near Rzeszów in Poland. He was part of the inner "Chevraya Kadisha" (Holy Society) school of the Maggid Rebbe Dov Ber of Mezeritch (second leader of the Hasidic movement), who became the decentralised, third generation leadership after the passing of Rebbe Dov Ber in 1772. Their dissemination to new areas of Eastern Europe led the movement´s rapid revivalist expansion.
      ellauri155.html on line 501: Terry Brooks, The 1st Milky Bar Mitzvah boy now 58 and married to his second wife, Sue, he has four children and five grandchildren.

      ellauri155.html on line 513: Achish trusted David, thinking, ‘He has made himself an utter stench to his people Israel; therefore he shall always be my servant’ ” (27:12).
      ellauri155.html on line 519: Advanced education can be helpful, but it is not required to know what God expects of us. This doctrine of perspicuity also recognizes that not everything in Scripture is easy to understand. Some passages are more difficult to interpret than others even if no one can miss the gospel in the pages of the Bible.
      ellauri155.html on line 521: Today’s passage certainly qualifies as one of the more difficult passages of Scripture. It is easy enough to understand what is going on; however, it is difficult to know how to evaluate it. We see in 1 Samuel 27:1–4 that David decided the best way to escape Saul was to flee to Philistine territory and take up residence in the city of Gath. David had been there before, and he deceived the city’s king, Achish, by pretending to be insane, thereby keeping the Philistines from killing him (21:10–15). This time, David did not have to feign insanity. Achish would have heard of Saul’s war with David, so he probably felt secure in allowing him into the city. This enemy of his enemy—Israel’s King Saul—could be counted on as a friend. Achish gave the country town of Ziklag to David, and it became a royal possession after David ascended the throne (27:5–7).
      ellauri155.html on line 523: Little in the narrative tells us what we are to think of David’s actions. Perhaps the very fact that he sought security among the Philistines is enough to make his choice questionable. After all, God had shown Himself able to keep David safe within the boundaries of Israel (chs. 18–26), so David’s seeking refuge in Philistia may indicate a lapse of faith. It could be that David’s raids from Ziklag confirm this. We see how David would go out against enemies of Israel such as the Amalekites (see Ex. 17:8–16) who were in the south of Judah. After defeating them, he would bring spoil back to Achish and lie to the king, telling him that he was conducting raids on the Israelites (1 Sam. 27:8–12). We do not want to make too much of this, for some actions are acceptable in times of war that are not necessarily acceptable in times of peace (for example, industrial espionage). This was a time of war, with both Achish and the peoples David raided being actual enemies of Israel. Still, David’s successful deception put him in a quandary. Achish was so pleased with David’s work that he commissioned David to join him against Israel (28:1–2). What would he do?
      ellauri155.html on line 585: 13Jos mies makaa miehen kanssa niin kuin naisen kanssa maataan, he ovat molemmat tehneet kauhistuttavan teon ja heidät on surmattava. He ovat itse ansainneet kuolemansa. 15Jos mies sekaantuu eläimeen, hänet on surmattava, ja myös eläin on surmattava. 16Jos nainen parittelee eläimen kanssa, surmattakoon sekä nainen että eläin. Molemmat on surmattava, sillä kumpikin on ansainnut kuolemansa. 16b Naisen makaamisesta naisen kanssa ei ole mitään pykälää. An mennä vaan.
      ellauri155.html on line 659: Schmitt was born in Plettenberg, Westphalia, German Empire. His parents were Roman Catholics from the German Eifel region who had settled in Plettenberg. His father was a minor businessman. He studied law at Berlin, Munich and Strasbourg and took his graduation and state examinations in then-German Strasbourg during 1915. His 1910 doctoral thesis was titled Über Schuld und Schuldarten (On Guilt and Types of Guilt). A chapter on nazi guilt for holocaust has been added poshumously.
      ellauri155.html on line 661: Schmitt volunteered for the army in 1916. The same year, he earned his habilitation at Strasbourg with a 1-page thesis under the title Der Wert des Staates und die Bedeutung des Einzelnen (The Value of the State and the Significance of the Individual). The whole thesis consists of a full-page picture of a turd.
      ellauri155.html on line 685: You must also note that God predestines people such as Paul and his friends in Rom. 8:30, and Eph. 1:5, 11. There is, however, controversy as to the nature of this predestination. In the Reformed (Calvinist) camp, predestination includes individuals. In other words, the Reformed doctrine of predestination is that God predestines whom He wants to be saved and that without this predestination, none would be saved. The non-Reformed camp states that God predestines people to salvation, but that these people freely choose to follow God on their own. In other words, in the non-Reformed perspective, God is reacting to the will of individuals and predestining them only because they choose God, whereby contrast the Reformed position states that people choose God only because He has first predestined them. I must say that the non-reformed position 2) sounds like gobbledygook. Either you get predestined or you don´t, what the fuck. Who was it that thought predestination and free will were compatible, was it Hume? Yes it was! The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy paper on this topic is so wordy that it needed translating into Basic English.
      ellauri155.html on line 709: Ize asiassa Hume on näkevinään apinoiden pesäpuuhissa samaa necessityä kuin kivikunnassa, ja se onkin tarpeellista jotta hommat hoituisivat, ja erityisen tarpeellista se on jotta tyypit uskoisivat jumalaan. Hume toistaa enimmäkseen monissa muissa compatibilist-tileissä esiintyvän väitteen, jonka mukaan välttämättömyyttä (determinismiä) tarvitaan tukemaan yleisesti tulevaisuuteen suuntautuvaa, utilitaristista teoriaa moraalisesta vastuusta ja rangaistuksesta. Höh, entäs teodikea, Mr. Hume? Ei tää nyt kyllä täysin komputoi. Hume luuli että poistamalla kausaatiosta salaisen energian se selvittäisi jotenkin myös vapaan tahdon ongelman. Paskat se mitään siinä muuttaa. Olikohan tää Hume nyt mistään kotoisin. Pääasiahan oli vapauden määrittely pakotuxen puutteexi, ja sen hoiteli jo vanha kunnon Ari.
      ellauri155.html on line 715: The incompatibilist maintains that if our willings and choices are themselves determined by antecedent causes then we could never choose otherwise than we do. Given the antecedent causal conditions, we must always act as we do. We cannot, therefore, be held responsible for our conduct since, on this account, we have no “genuine alternatives” or “open possibilities” available to us. Incompatibilists, as already noted, do not accept that Hume’s notion of “hypothetical liberty”, as presented in the Enquiry, can deal with this objection. It is true, of course, that hypothetical liberty leaves room for the truth of conditionals that suggest that we could have acted otherwise if we had chosen to do so. However, it still remains the case, the incompatibilist argues, that the agent could not have chosen otherwise given the actual circumstances. Responsibility, they claim, requires categorical freedom to choose otherwise in the same circumstances. Hypothetical freedom alone will not suffice. One way of expressing this point in more general terms is that the incompatibilist holds that for responsibility we need more than freedom of action, we also need freedom of will – understood as a power to choose between open alternatives. Failing this, the agent has no ultimate control over her conduct.
      ellauri155.html on line 721: Mihin vittuun noi sakemannit tarvii tota kostoa? Koska ne haluaa maxaa samalla Porvoon mitalla. Silmä silmästä, hammas hampaasta. Mitä väliä kuha toimii, ajattelee anglosaxit ja panee karvakädet Guantanamoon. Notice that the old strawman Strawson raises his ugly head in this connection. He was last heard of in album 84 when relating Ludi Wittgenstein´s late religious troubles.
      ellauri155.html on line 727: In the Treatise, as was noted earlier, Hume argues that one of the reasons “why the doctrine of liberty [of indifference] has generally been better receiv’d in the world, than its antagonist [the doctrine of necessity], proceeds from religion, which has been very unnecessarily interested in this question” (T 2.3.2.3/409). He goes on to argue “that the doctrine of necessity, according to my explication of it, is not only innocent, but even advantageous to religion and morality”. In the final passages of the Enquiry discussion of liberty and necessity (EU 8.32–6/99–103) – passages which do not appear in the original Treatise discussion – Hume makes it plain exactly how his necessitarian principles have “dangerous consequences for religion”.
      ellauri155.html on line 748: From inside of his asylum, Calvin defines his doctrine in the following manner:
      ellauri155.html on line 752: Calvin then offers Scriptural support for this definition by tracing the development of this doctrine through the increasing revelation of the Bible in the following steps:
      ellauri155.html on line 754: He begins with Abraham, showing how the Lord chose this man to be His special representative out of all the people of the world. Most Christians do not struggle with accepting the truth that Abraham was chosen by God, and immediately Calvin personalizes this doctrine by using Abraham.
      ellauri155.html on line 755: Consequently, Calvin shows that Israel who descended from Abraham was also then chosen by God. He quotes verses such as Deuteronomy 7:7-8 which says, “The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because you were more in number than any people: for ye were the fewest of all people: but because the Lord loved you.”
      ellauri155.html on line 756: Calvin then goes on to speak of a deeper dimension of predestination, that in the Old Testament we see a more special election still of God saving certain ones out of the nation of Israel. Calvin says that his readers must see how “the grace of God was displayed in a more special form, when of the same family of Abraham God rejected some.” He then refers to Malachi 1:2-3 which explicitly states, “Was not Esau Jacob’s brother? saith the Lord: yet I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau.”
      ellauri155.html on line 757: Finally, Calvin comes into the New Testament and shows how the Apostle Paul in Romans quotes this very text from Malachi to substantiate predestination. He quotes from Romans 9:15, itself another quote from the Old Testament: “For he (the Lord) saith to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.’” Why it´s always this damned Paul! I bet he had a drooping mouth like Jürgen Habermas. Calvin then later asks,
      ellauri155.html on line 759: And what pray, does this mean? It is just a clear declaration by the Lord that he finds nothing in men themselves to induce him to show kindness, that it is owing entirely to his own mercy, and, accordingly, that their salvation is his own work. Since God places your salvation in himself alone, why should you descend to yourself?
      ellauri155.html on line 761: So important was it to Calvin to believe this doctrine that he said, “We shall never feel persuaded as we ought that our salvation flows from the free mercy of God as its fountain, until we are made acquainted with his eternal election.” Yet even though he saw eternal election this way, he also stressed a need for caution.
      ellauri155.html on line 763: Calvin was far more careful with this doctrine than his critics were and are. Calvin understood men would react strongly against predestination. “The human mind, when it hears this doctrine, cannot restrain its petulance, but boils and rages as if aroused by the sound of a trumpet.” People who hear the teaching of predestination rarely remain unaffected by it. Their hearts too become enflamed, either with these teachings or against them. Calvin offers caution in the wrongful handling of this doctrine.
      ellauri155.html on line 765: He does so by warning his readers not to make anything else but God’s will their ultimate trust.
      ellauri155.html on line 767: The will of God is the supreme rule of righteousness, so that everything which he wills must be held to be righteous by the mere fact of his willing it. Therefore, when it is asked why the Lord did so, we must answer, ‘Because he pleased.’ But if you proceed farther to ask why he pleased, you ask for something greater and more sublime than the will of God, and nothing such can be found.
      ellauri155.html on line 769: Calvin taught that God’s will is to be our resting place. He cautions those trying to go beyond the limit of their understanding. When men hear of election, they immediately want to ask, “Why would God choose some, and not others?” To this Calvin replied:
      ellauri155.html on line 771: “When they inquire into predestination, let then remember that they are penetrating into the recesses of the divine wisdom, where he who rushes forward securely and confidently, instead of satisfying his curiosity will enter in (an) inextricable labyrinth.”
      ellauri155.html on line 783: Calvin even demonstrated his commitment to this truth in his placement of his teaching on predestination in The Institutes. In the final edition, he moved his section on predestination from the beginning of his work to a place following his teaching on redemption, in effect suggesting “that predestination is a doctrine best understood by believers after they come to know the redemptive work of Jesus Christ applied by the Holy Spirit.”
      ellauri155.html on line 787: Calvin then addresses the mistaken notion that election removes human responsibility. Many today associate John Calvin with an aberration of his teaching called Hyper-Calvinism, which is a doctrine that emphasizes divine sovereignty to the exclusion of human responsibility. Among other things, Hyper-Calvinism would deny 1) that gospel invitations are to be delivered to all people without exception; 2) that men can be urged to come to Christ; and 3) that God has a universal love. To Calvin these teachings were monstrous distortions of truth. God really loves a lot also those he chucks into the recycle bin. Except Esau, whom he hates. Vitun karvakäsi.
      ellauri155.html on line 789: Another argument which they employ to overthrow predestination is that if it stand, all care and study of well doing must cease. For what man can hear (say they) that life and death are fixed by an eternal and immutable decree of God, without immediately concluding that it is of no consequence how he acts, since no work of his can either hinder or further the predestination of God?
      ellauri155.html on line 791: What was Calvin’s answer? He reminds his readers what the predestinated are predestined to do! He points out what the Apostle Paul said in Ephesians 1:4, where he reminds us that the end for which we are elected is “that we should be holy, and without blame before him.” “If the end of election is holiness of life, it ought to arouse and stimulate us strenuously to aspire to it, instead of serving as a pretext for sloth.” He develops how predestination should lead us to fear God all the more, and consequently should both comfort us and spur us on even in the worst of times to greater holiness.
      ellauri155.html on line 793: To put it simply: though being good doesn´t entitle you to heaven, being bad is a sure way to end in hell. By being good you can at least enter the lottery. It makes no difference game theoretically whether God arranged his lottery before or after the fact. The information sets are just the same. Game theoretically, being good continues to carry a slight positive utility toward the jackpot.
      ellauri155.html on line 798: Calvin exemplified a pastoral use of this doctrine, patterned after Christ and the apostles, who used this doctrine in two chief ways - to humble the proud and to comfort the humble.
      ellauri155.html on line 800: The ministry of the Word thus required more than the public exposition of Scripture: it also entailed the declaration and application of God’s Word to individual women and men, girls and boys, through the sacraments, corrective discipline, catechetical instruction, household visitations, and spiritual counsel and consolation. As Calvin noted in his liturgy, ‘the office of a true and faithful minister is not only to teach the people in public, which is he appointed to do as a pastor, but also, as much as he is able, to admonish, exhort, warn, and console each person individually.
      ellauri155.html on line 802: In Volume 4 of John Calvin’s Tracts and Letters, a letter written by Calvin in April of 1541 can be found. It is a fairly lengthy letter written to Monsieur de Richebourg because his son Louis, a young man, had recently died. Louis had been a student of Calvin at the Academy in Geneva, and the impact of his young friend’s death can be heard at the beginning of this letter to the deceased’s father:
      ellauri155.html on line 806: In this letter, we see Calvin using predestination as a “doctrine of comfort.” Listen to how Calvin then uses the doctrine of predestination to minister to this grieving father.
      ellauri155.html on line 808: There is nothing which is more dispiriting to us than while we vex and annoy ourselves with this sort of question – Why is it not otherwise with us? Why has it so happened that we came to this place? [In other words, why has God allowed this to happen to us?] ...It is God, therefore, who has sought back from you your son, whom he committed to you to be educated, on the condition, that he might always be his own. And therefore, he took him away, because it was both of an advantage to him to leave this world, and by this bereavement to humble you, or to make trial of your patience. If you do not understand the advantage of this, without delay, first of all, set aside every other object of consideration, and ask of God that he may show you. Should it be his will to exercise you still further, by concealing it from you, submit to that will, that you may become the wiser than the weakness of your own understanding can ever attain to.”
      ellauri155.html on line 810: The last sentence is rather remarkable. “Should it be his will to exercise you still further, by concealing it from you, submit to that will, that you may become the wiser than the weakness of your own understanding can ever attain to.” Calvin shows how much wisdom and comfort can be found in submitting to God’s divine will, trusting Him regardless of how much or how little of that will He has revealed to the afflicted. In so doing, he reveals to us true pastoral care in using this Biblical doctrine. Hey, just how much is it? I did not notice any quote.
      ellauri155.html on line 818: Peter Frederick Strawson (1919–2006) was an Oxford-based philosopher whose career spanned the second half of the twentieth century. He wrote most notably about the philosophy of language, metaphysics, epistemology and the history of philosophy, especially Kant.
      ellauri155.html on line 822: Strawson was committed to the value of publication, of books and articles, whereas Austin seemed content to develop his views and promulgate them in lectures and talks. His achievements were recognised by election in 1960 to the British Academy, by the reception of a knighthood in 1977 and by many other honours. In 1998 he became the twenty-sixth philosopher to have a volume devoted to him in the famous Library of Living Philosophers series, adding another British name to the list of recipients of this honour, previous ones being Whitehead, Russell, Moore, Broad and Ayer. Austin did not get included, nyaah nyaah nyaah!
      ellauri155.html on line 850: Roderick Chisholm (1997)
      ellauri155.html on line 868: One can see in this paper an application of some ideas of a Humean character to a domain to which Hume himself was not inclined to apply them. There is also a suggestive affinity with Kant’s attempt to dissolve the problem of free will in the Critique of Pure Reason.
      ellauri155.html on line 878: Jorge Agustín Nicolás Ruiz de Santayana y Borrás, known in English as George Santayana (/ˌsæntiˈænə, -ˈɑːnə/;[2] December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952), was a philosopher, essayist, poet, and novelist. Originally from Spain, Santayana was raised and educated in the US from the age of eight and identified himself as an American, although he always retained a valid Spanish passport. At the age of 48, Santayana left his position at Harvard and returned to Europe permanently. He got enough of the U.S. of A.
      ellauri155.html on line 880: Santayana is mostly known for aphorisms, such as "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it", "Only the dead have seen the end of war", and the definition of beauty as "pleasure objectified". Although an atheist, he treasured the Spanish Catholic values, practices, and worldview in which he was raised.] Santayana was a broad-ranging cultural critic spanning many disciplines. He was profoundly influenced by Spinoza´s life and thought; and, in many respects, was another Spinoza. Was he too a jew? I guess not. His father was a minor intellectual. His mother married a Bostonian merchant Sturgis who died. In Madrid, he married the Santayana guy. In 1869, Josefina Borrás de Santayana returned to Boston with her three Sturgis children, because she had promised her first husband to raise the children in the US. She left the six-year-old Jorge with his father in Spain. Jorge and his father followed her to Boston in 1872. His father, finding neither Boston nor his wife´s attitude to his liking, soon returned alone to Ávila, and remained there the rest of his life as a minor intellectual.
      ellauri155.html on line 882: Young Santayana spent a lot of time in Harvard under William James. He was involved in 11 clubs as an alternative to athletics. He did not like athletics. He was founder and president of the Philosophical Club, a member of the literary society known as the O.K., an editor and cartoonist for The Harvard Lampoon, and co-founder of the literary journal The Harvard Monthly, to name a few. In December, 1885, he played the role of Lady Elfrida in the Hasty Pudding theatrical Robin Hood, followed by the production Papillonetta in the spring of his senior year. Would have been less hassle to take part in athletics. But maybe he was a little like that, sissy-missy, you know. Yep yep:
      ellauri155.html on line 884: Santayana never married. His romantic life, if any, is not well understood. Some evidence, including a comment Santayana made late in life comparing himself to A. E. Housman, and his friendships with people who were openly homosexual and bisexual, has led scholars to speculate that Santayana was perhaps homosexual or bisexual, but it remains unclear whether he had any actual heterosexual or homosexual relationships.
      ellauri155.html on line 886: Santayana ei tykännyt olla professori, se oli ajautunut siihen. Se lopettikin professorin hommat 48-vuotiaana tykkänään ja lähti seikkailemaan. Varmaan homostelukin oli silleen helpompaa. In later life, Santayana was financially comfortable, in part because his 1935 novel, The Last Puritan, had become an unexpected best-seller. In turn, he financially assisted a number of writers, including Bertrand Russell, with whom he was in fundamental disagreement, philosophically and politically. Santayana´s only novel, The Last Puritan, ist ein bildungsroman, centering on the personal growth of its protagonist, Oliver Alden. His Persons and Places is an autobiography. These works also contain many of his sharper opinions and bons mots. He wrote books and essays on a wide range of subjects, including philosophy of a less technical sort, literary criticism, the history of ideas, politics, human nature, morals, the influence of religion on culture and social psychology, all with considerable wit and humor.
      ellauri155.html on line 888: Like William James, his friend and mentor, he wrote philosophy in a literary way. Ezra Pound includes Santayana among his many cultural references in The Cantos, notably in "Canto LXXXI" and "Canto XCV". Santayana is usually considered an American writer, although he declined to become an American citizen, resided in Fascist Italy for decades, and said that he was most comfortable, intellectually and aesthetically, at Oxford University. Although an atheist, Santayana considered himself an "aesthetic Catholic" and spent the last decade of his life in a Roman residence under Catholic nuns. It felt a little like his young days under William James. He held racial superiority and eugenic views. He believed superior races should be discouraged from "intermarriage with inferior stock". Maybe that was why he had no kids.
      ellauri155.html on line 890: Chuck Jones used Santayana´s description of fanaticism as "redoubling your effort after you´ve forgotten your aim" to describe his cartoons starring Wile E. Coyote and Road Runner.
      ellauri155.html on line 929: And soon must forth, to know his own at last. Ja sen pitää pian mennä Taunon lailla kotio.
      ellauri155.html on line 930: In his large life to live, I fain would die. Jos eläisin hyvässä Toivossa kuin se, kuolisinkin.
      ellauri155.html on line 932: But calling not his suffering his own; Eikä tiedä että sen kärsimys on sen omaa;
      ellauri155.html on line 935: Wretched the mortal, pondering his mood, Surkea on kuolevainen, jota mielialat jäytävät,
      ellauri155.html on line 936: And doomed to know his aching heart alone. Tuomittuna ize tietämään oma kurja tilansa.
      ellauri155.html on line 944: and divorcing not wisely but too often. He is now Earl Russell—that is his
      ellauri155.html on line 949: of his death a few years ago. Bertie for n /a long period was Fellow of Trinity
      ellauri155.html on line 951: had to resign during the war, having been put in prison for pacifist agitation, as his brother had been put in prison for bigamy. Jail-birds! but only out of pure
      ellauri155.html on line 954: In the enclosed letter Bertie speaks of his “ex-wife”; but this is his second
      ellauri155.html on line 955: ex-wife, Dora; his first ex-wife, Alice, is a decent person who has money of
      ellauri155.html on line 962: I mention all this tangle of relations and friends, so that you may see for
      ellauri155.html on line 969: year for three or four years, but anonymously. This anonymity is important,
      ellauri155.html on line 970: because he and his friends think of me as a sort of person in the margin, impecunious, and egoistic; and it would humiliate Bertie to think that I was supporting him. And all that bevy of relations—especially the Smiths who are great
      ellauri155.html on line 977: anything positively untrue, we can easily keep up this incognito, because they
      ellauri155.html on line 981: For this reason, I am troubling you about this matter. Otherwise I might
      ellauri155.html on line 1002: Perhaps I ought to say something about this extraordinary person, Lady
      ellauri155.html on line 1003: Ottoline Morrell, whose letter (enclosed) started this whole project. She is a
      ellauri155.html on line 1013: of Bertie with his latest wife and child.
      ellauri155.html on line 1022: that may go down in history: somebody said in public not long ago that there
      ellauri155.html on line 1023: were only three important names in the history of British Philosophy: Locke,
      ellauri155.html on line 1044: In regard to the future, the intention is to repeat this gift every six months
      ellauri155.html on line 1049: cial world. We believe, however, that you may reasonably expect to receive this
      ellauri155.html on line 1052: This answers some of your questions. It is important to forecast the future,
      ellauri155.html on line 1059: he is a Peer and has taken his supplement ]–
      ellauri156.html on line 45: But here is the spoiler: What David's story tells us is that it is OK to be as awful and nasty a person privately as you could ever wish to be, as long as you end up as the overall winner of the cup. Winners can do nothing seriously wrong, because the victory at the end is the crucial thing. In terms of good old game theory: a virtuous life is no game of attrition, where every mistake counts and your deeds are toted up at the end. No, it is a winner takes all, you either win or lose at the end, whatever happens in subgames on the way is just wiped away. This applies to Dog himself, as Lauri Snellman with his nifty jesuitical game-theoretical theodicy argument has shown.
      ellauri156.html on line 54: Robert L. (Bob) Deffinbaugh graduated from Dallas Theological Seminary with his Th.M. in 1971. Bob is a pastor/teacher and elder at Community Bible Chapel in Richardson, Texas, and has contributed many of his Bible study series for use by the Foundation. Bob was born in a manger and raised in a barn... More
      ellauri156.html on line 62: When my Grandmother Palmer was alive, she lived on a farm outside of Shelton, Washington. At the entrance to her driveway was a small lot, where a small mobile home was parked. As I recall, the woman who lived in the trailer and her husband were estranged. The husband, who had served time in prison, was prone to violence. When the husband came to the mobile home to see his wife, another man was there. An argument resulted, and blows were exchanged. Ultimately, the woman's visitor brandished a weapon and demanded that the husband leave. He left, but only while uttering threats about what he was yet to do.
      ellauri156.html on line 64: A few hours later, my uncle came by to visit my grandmother. He was just entering the driveway, very near the little mobile home where the altercation occurred earlier. Unfortunately, my uncle was driving a car which looked similar to the one driven by the estranged husband's adversary parked outside the trailer earlier in the day. Gunshots rang out as the enraged husband fulfilled his vow. The rifle easily penetrated the windshield, and my uncle was instantly killed -- by mistake. The angry husband had killed my uncle, falsely assuming that he was his adversary.
      ellauri156.html on line 66: As a result of this incident, I became a man of god. This was just too much of a coincidence to be an accident - it had to be Providence, I mean Dog's plan!
      ellauri156.html on line 68: Many tragic incidents occur as the unexpected outcome of a sequence of events. Certainly that is the case with King David. A little vacation from war leads to a day spent in bed, followed by a stroll along the roof of his palace as night begins to fall on Jerusalem. By chance, David sees a woman bathing herself, a sight which David fixes upon, his pecker coming instantly to attention, and then follows up on with an investigation as to her identity. The woman is shortly summoned to the palace and then to his bedroom, where David sleeps with her (well no, actually he spends time with her very much awake; what is meant by this euphemism is that he fucks the lady crazy.) Even though he has discovered she is the wife of Uriah, a warrior who is fighting for the army of Israel. Never mind. The woman becomes pregnant, and so David calls Uriah home, hoping it will be thought that he has gotten his wife pregnant. When this does not work, David gives orders to Joab, the commander of the army, which arranges for Uriah's death in battle. It looks like the perfect crime, but David's sin is discovered and dealt with by Nathan, the prophet of God. Nathan is Philip Roth's alter ego's name, Nathan Zuckerman! Can this be an accident? Jehova knows, it's too late to ask Phil.
      ellauri156.html on line 70: This sequence of events and its accompanying tragedies is the subject of chapters 11 and 12 of 2 Samuel. I have chosen to expound these chapters in three lessons. This first lesson will deal with “David and Bathsheba,” as described in 11:1-4. In the following lesson, we will address the subject of “David and Uriah,” as told by our author in 11:5-27. The third lesson will focus on “David and Nathan,” as this confrontation is put forth in chapter 12. Our text has much to say about the sins of adultery and murder, but rest assured that it addresses much more sins than this. It is a text we all need to hear and to heed, for if a “man after God's own heart” can fall so quickly and so far, surely we are capable of similar or even bigger failures. May the Spirit of God take this portion of the Word of God and illuminate it to each of us in full color, as we come to this study.
      ellauri156.html on line 72: The best part in my opinion is the bit in Talmud where David looks Bathsheba in the eyes and sees his own horny face reflected there and is sick of the whole thing. From then on he will not touch Bathseba anymore down there ever again and leaves her to languish in his harem bored as hell. Maybe David barfed because Bathsheba was already corked. He was used to virgins.
      ellauri156.html on line 74: Before we begin to look carefully at verses 1-4 of chapter 11, allow me to make a couple of comments about this event as portrayed in these two chapters of 2 Samuel. First, I want you to notice the “law of proportion” in this text. Only three verses describe David's sin of adultery with Bathsheba. Second, the author pulls no punches in describing the wickedness of this sin. History is not written in a way that makes David look good. Third, the sin of David and Bathsheba is dealt with historically, but not in a Hollywood fashion. Hollywood filmmakers would perform a remake of this account to dwell on the sensual elements. Nothing in this text is intended to inspire unclean thoughts or actions. Indeed, this story is written in a way that causes us to shudder at the thought of such things. I know it is something of a letdown, but at least myself, I was totally capable of imagining the rest. (I got 5 streetwalking girls and a wife, for God's sake.) If you need help with unclean thoughts here, please consult Gonorrhé Ballsack's Comtes Droolatiques.
      ellauri156.html on line 76: Israel is at war with none other than the Ammonites (verse 1), which may come as a surprise to you as it did to me. (Well, to be honest, I thought they were the cretacean mollusks by the same name.) I thought the Ammonites had been defeated in chapter 10. I was wrong. The author is very clear on this matter. In chapter 8, the author tells how David began to engage his enemies in battle, ending the strangle-hold these surrounding nations had on Israel. David subjected the Philistines (8:1), then the Moabites (8:2), and then he took on the king of Zobah (8:3ff.). In the process, other nations became involved and found Israel too formidable an enemy to oppose again. (Notice the similarity of the situation here to the Yom Kippur War.)
      ellauri156.html on line 78: In chapter 10, we find David and the men of Israel deliberately insulted by Hanun, the king of the Ammonites. David had become friends with Nahash, the former king. When he died, David sent a delegation of officials to express David's respect for Nahash and his grief over this king's death. The Ammonites do not seem to wish to continue this peaceful relationship with David and Israel, so they humiliate the men whom David sent. This is how it all happened (Bob omitted this):
      ellauri156.html on line 81: 5 When David was told about this, he sent messengers to meet the men, for they were greatly humiliated. The king said, “Stay at Jericho till your beards have grown, and then come back.”
      ellauri156.html on line 84: This leads to a war between the Israelites and the Ammonites. The Ammonites recruit the Syrians as their allies against David. In their first conflict, the Syrians flee, forcing the Ammonites to retreat to “the city” (10:14; which must be Rabbah -- see 12:26ff.). The Syrians are not content with their defeat and attempt a rematch, but once again they are defeated. This causes them to give up any thought of backing up the Ammonites in their war with Israel in the future.
      ellauri156.html on line 86: So you see, the Ammonites were not subjected to Israel in chapter 10, but they were deprived of Syrian assistance. Now they are on their own. The Israelites make the most of this. They ravage the land of the Ammonites and then besiege the capital (royal) city of Rabbah (11:1; see 1 Chronicles 20:1). This city of Rabbah, incidentally, is now the city of Amman, Jordan. It is not until after David's sin is rebuked by Nathan that the Israelites actually take the city (2 Samuel 12:26-31).
      ellauri156.html on line 88: The author of our text informs us that it is spring, the time when kings go to war (11:1). Weather has always affected warfare. Battles have been won and lost due to the season. Winter time is not favorable to war. Napoleon found this out in Moscow, The Germans in Stalingrad, and the Russians in the Finnish Winter War.) It is cold and wet, and camping out in the open field (as those who are besieging the city of Rabbah have to do -- see 11:11) hardly is feasible. The wheels of chariots get stuck in the mud, among other problems. And so kings usually sit it out for the winter, resuming their warfare in the spring. It is spring, Israel is still at war with the Ammonites, and it is time to finish the task of subduing them. The army assembles, under the command of Joab and his officers, and “all Israel.” They all go off to complete their victory over the Ammonites, who seem to retreat in their capital and fortress city of Rabbah.
      ellauri156.html on line 90: Every man who is able to fight goes to war, except one -- David. David, we are told, “stayed in Jerusalem” (11:1). David's decision to stay at home in Jerusalem becomes a devastating one. The author of Samuel does not include this fact, but the Chronicler does. In 1 Chronicles 20, we read these words:
      ellauri156.html on line 94: We know from the details of this text in Chronicles that it is the same time and the same war. This decision on David's part precedes a serious sin of another kind in 1 Chronicles 21:
      ellauri156.html on line 96: 1 Then Satan stood up against Israel and moved David to number Israel. 2 So David said to Joab and to the princes of the people, “Go, number Israel from Beersheba even to Dan, and bring me word that I may know their number.” 3 Joab said, “May the LORD add to His people a hundred times as many as they are! But, my lord the king, are they not all my lord's servants? Why does my lord seek this thing? Why should he be a cause of guilt to Israel?” 4 Nevertheless, the king's word prevailed against Joab. Therefore, Joab departed and went throughout all Israel, and came to Jerusalem. 5 Joab gave the number of the census of all the people to David. And all Israel were 1,100,000 men who drew the sword; and Judah was 470,000 men who drew the sword (1 Chronicles 21:1-5).
      ellauri156.html on line 98: Joab urges David not to number the Israelites, and through the prophet Egad, God rebukes David for doing so, giving him a choice of one of three chastenings. It is a grave sin with great consequences for the nation Israel. Out of this sin, God brings about blessing for Israel, because it is on the plot of ground where David offers sacrifices to God that the temple will be built. What chastenings?
      ellauri156.html on line 100: 9 The Lord said to Egad, David’s seer, 10 “Go and tell David, ‘This is what the Lord says: I am giving you three options. Choose one of them for me to carry out against you.’” 11 So Gad went to David and said to him, “This is what the Lord says: ‘Take your choice: 12 three years of famine, three months of being swept away[a] before your enemies, with their swords overtaking you, or three days of the sword of the Lord—days of plague in the land, with the angel of the Lord ravaging every part of Israel.’ Now then, decide how I should answer the one who sent me.”
      ellauri156.html on line 102: 13 David said to Egad, “Hmm. I am in deep distress. Let me fall into the hands of the Lord, for his mercy is very great; but do not let me fall into human hands, that's too humiliating.”
      ellauri156.html on line 112: The Israelites were wrong in demanding a king, but they were not too far off in expecting that their “king” would lead them in war. The judges God had raised up for them earlier were usually men like Barak or Gideon, who would lead the nation in battle against their enemies. When God designated Saul as Israel's first king, this military role was clearly indicated:
      ellauri156.html on line 114: 15 Now a day before Saul's coming, the LORD had revealed this to Samuel saying, 16 “About this time tomorrow I will send you a man from the land of Benjamin, and you shall anoint him to be prince over My people Israel; and he will deliver My people from the hand of the Philistines. For I have regarded My people, because their cry has come to Me” (1 Samuel 9:15-16).
      ellauri156.html on line 116: Saul shrunk back from pursuing the enemies of Israel at times, and it was sometimes David who stood in Saul's shoes, leading the nation in battle. This was the case, for example, when David fought Goliath, a battle that should have been fought by Saul, Israel's giant (see 1 Samuel 9:2). Up until now, David has been leading his men in battle, but in chapter 11, David suddenly steps back, sending others to fight for him. In 2 Samuel 12:26-31, the author makes it clear that David may not have been planning to be present for the formal surrender of Rabbah. Joab sends David a message, urging him to come and at least give the appearance of leading his army. If David does not come, Joab warns, David will not receive the glory, and it may go to Joab. Joab knows that David knows this is not the way it was meant to be. And so it is that David makes a formal appearance to be the “official” leader at the time of the surrender of the city of Rabbah.
      ellauri156.html on line 120: What the fuck? Jesus was a wimp par excellence, so precisely by NOT taking part in a war David was a perfect role model for this pacifist.
      ellauri156.html on line 122: What keeps David home in Jerusalem? Why doesn’t David go to the battle? I fear there are perhaps several reasons. The first is David's arrogance. God has been with David in all of his military encounters and given him victory over all his foes. God has given David a great name. David has begun to believe his own press clippings. He begins to feel he is invincible. David seems to have come to the place where he believes his abilities are so great he can lead Israel into victory, even though he is not with his men in battle. He was just getting bored. God should not have helped him TOO much, that was like taking the wind from his sails. Any parent knows that much.
      ellauri156.html on line 124: This seems consistent with David's other great sin, which also follows his decision to stay at home. When David instructs Joab to number the Israelite warriors, Joab protests. This is something David should not do. Perhaps this is because David would find too much confidence in the number of his men, rather than in God. It certainly is a far cry from Gideon's army, pared down to a meager 300 men.
      ellauri156.html on line 138: Voit auttaa Wikipediaa jakamalla artikkelin useampaan artikkeliin tai lyhentämällä artikkelia turhista osioista.]
      ellauri156.html on line 142: According to Beatles historian Kenneth Womack, McCartney drew his inspiration for the song from Robert Service’s poem “The Shooting of Dan McGrew.” The Old West-style honky-tonk piano was played by producer George Martin. "Rocky Raccoon" is also the last Beatles song to feature John Lennon's harmonica playing.
      ellauri156.html on line 145: The lyrics describe a conflict over a love triangle, in which Rocky's girlfriend Lil Magill (known to the public as Nancy) leaves him for a man named Dan, who punches Rocky in the eye. Rocky vows revenge and takes a room at the saloon in the town where Dan and Nancy are staying. He bursts into Dan's room, armed with a gun, but Dan out-draws and shoots him. A drunken doctor attends to Rocky, the latter insisting that the wound is only a minor one. Stumbling back to his room, Rocky finds a Gideon Bible and takes it as a sign from God.
      ellauri156.html on line 151: And one day his woman ran off with another guy
      ellauri156.html on line 157: Rocky Raccoon checked into his room
      ellauri156.html on line 160: To shoot off the legs of his rival
      ellauri156.html on line 162: His rival, it seems, had broken his dreams
      ellauri156.html on line 163: By stealing the girl of his fancy
      ellauri156.html on line 170: He said, "Danny boy, this is a showdown"
      ellauri156.html on line 191: And now Rocky Raccoon, he fell back in his room
      ellauri156.html on line 209: A second reason may be boredom. Something you my dear remaining readers know by now. It is one thing to fight battles in which the enemy is quickly overcome. But the besieging of Rabbah is a whole different kind of war. This battle will not be won so quickly. It will take time to starve the Ammonites to the point that they surrender. It is not a very exciting kind of war to wage. And while they wait, the Israelite soldiers (which includes David) have to pitch their tents outside the city, living in the open field. This is no picnic, and David knows it. David's attitude seems reflected in the advertising slogan of a major hamburger chain, “You deserve a break today.”
      ellauri156.html on line 211: A third reason -- and I am hesitant to suggest it -- is that David may be getting soft. Let's face it, David had some very difficult days when he was fleeing from Saul. I am sure there were hot days and cold nights. There were certainly days when his food was either limited or lousy, or both. Army food has never been known as a work of culinary artistry. Now, David has moved up in the world, from barren wilderness, which Saul and his army would avoid if possible, to the hills of Jerusalem. His accommodations are better, too. He no longer lives in a tent (if he was fortunate enough to have one in those days); he lives in a palace. Why would David want to stay in a tent in the open field, outside of Rabbah, if he can stay in his own bed (or Bathsheba's), in his own palace, inside Jerusalem?37
      ellauri156.html on line 213: David is starting to become Saul-like, in that he is willing to let others go out and fight his battles for him. Among those David is willing to send in his place are Joab and Abishai. This Joab, we should recall, is a violent man. Joab was not the commander of the army of Israel by David's choice. David had distanced himself from Joab and Abishai because of the death of li'l Abner (2 Samuel 3:26-30). Joab had become the commander of Israel's armed forces because he was the first to accept David's challenge to attack Jebus (1 Chronicles 11:4-6). Suddenly, David is willing to stay at home and leave the whole of Israel's armed forces under Joab's command. I do not think David is motivated by trust in Joab as much as he is his disdain for the hardship of the campaign to take Rabbah.
      ellauri156.html on line 234: As I read these verses in 2 Samuel, I am reminded of the Alfred Hitchcock movie, “Rear Window.” If my memory is correct, Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly star in this thriller about a photographer who is recovering from an injury and confined to his apartment. From out of his “rear window,” Stewart watches his neighbors through their windows. Eventually he uncovers a murder and is almost killed himself, along with his girlfriend. Älä pieni perssilmä kazo minne vain.
      ellauri156.html on line 236: King David makes the mistake of staying in Jerusalem, rather than fighting the Ammonites with his army. He does not stay home to meditate on the Law of Moses or to write another psalm or two; he seems to stay home to stay in bed. We know Uriah went to bed when it was evening (that is, when it got dark), and it is very likely that he got up at first light (see 11:13). With David, it is very different. David does not get up until evening, that is, until it is time for a soldier to go to bed. (As a friend of mine pointed out, this is probably a habit developed over days and not just a one-time event.) It is very unlikely that David is doing any “kingly work” in the wee hours of the night. From all appearances, David is simply indulging himself. Whaddya mean? Fucking maidens is kingly work if anything. Surely he wasn't watching late night shows, since all he had was his TV mama. Sitting up and adjusting the screen until the picture was completely right.
      ellauri156.html on line 267: Finally, David can stand his bed no longer. Getting up, he goes for a stroll around the roof of his palace. Most certainly, David's palace was built on the highest ground possible, so that it would afford him a commanding view of the city and the surrounding country. Virtually every other residence and building would be below David's penthouse apartment, and thus he would be able to see much that was out of sight for others. (A friend remarked after this message that a truck driver had told him a whole lot can be seen from an 18-wheeler that people in cars don't see. A chicano truck-driver just got a 110 year sentence in the U.S. for failing to stop his 18-wheeler when the brakes went. Now that was a honest-to-god Jehova style sentence, to the third and fourth generation. Good work, Rocky!)
      ellauri156.html on line 269: I am not suggesting that David purposed to see something he should not. (I bet he did, peeping Tom. You actually come round to the same conclusion below, Bob.) More than likely he is walking about, almost absent-mindedly, when suddenly his eyes fix on something that rivets his attention on a woman bathing herself. The text does not really tell us where this woman is bathing, and why at this time of the night? We only know that she is within sight of David's penthouse (rooftop). David notes her beauty. He does not know who she is or whether she is married. We cannot be certain how much David sees, and thus we do not know for certain whether he has yet sinned. (What the fuck? How much do you need to see to sin? Are boobs enough, or do you need to see the pudendum or the fanny?) If David saw more of this woman than he should (a fact still in question), then he surely should have diverted his eyes. It was not necessarily evil for him to discretely inquire about her. If she were unmarried and eligible, he could have taken her for his wife. His inquiry would make this clear.
      ellauri156.html on line 271: Word comes back to David about this woman's identity:
      ellauri156.html on line 273: 3b And one said, “From your minutious description, is this not Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite?” (2 Samuel 11:3b)
      ellauri156.html on line 275: The answer comes to David in the form of a question. I take it that no one else actually saw this woman, but only David. The identification of this woman depends then upon David's description of her age, appearance, and location, and no one could be absolutely certain whether this is the woman or not -- except for David, of course, who would recognize her.
      ellauri156.html on line 283: The information David receives should be sufficient for him to end the matter, or more appropriately, to start it. If this woman is married, he has no business going any further. No matter how great his position and power, nothing gives him the right to take another man's wife. The pattern for David's actions is clearly outlined by Joseph, who was hotly pursued by his master's wife (but the shoe was on the other foot that time, a puma hunting for a young rattlesnake. And Joseph was a bachelor, so what was the sin in that?).
      ellauri156.html on line 285: 7 It came about after these events that his master's wife looked with desire at Joseph, and she said, “Lie with me.” 8 But he refused and said to his master's wife, “Behold, with me here, my master does not concern himself with anything in the house, and he has put all that he owns in my charge. 9 “There is no one greater in this house than I, and he has withheld nothing from me except you, because you are his wife. How then could I do this great evil and sin against God?” (Genesis 39:7-9).
      ellauri156.html on line 287: The report David is given concerning Bathsheba gives him all the information he needs, and more, if he is intent upon doing what is right. He knows Bathsheba is married and thus out of the question. He also knows Bathsheba is married to Uriah the Hittite. This is no nameless husband, someone David has never heard of before. David has to know Uriah, even if he does not know his wife. In 2 Samuel 23:39, “Uriah the Hittite” is named as one of David's mighty men, known for his bravery and courage as a soldier. If he does not know it, surely someone there among his servants would inform him.
      ellauri156.html on line 289: My fear is that David chose to ignore Uriah's military record and to fix his attention upon his racial origins. It is obvious and noteworthy that David refers to Uriah as “Uriah the Hittite,” while the author of Samuel refers to him only as “Uriah.” The expression, “Uriah the Hittite” is a term of derision, I believe, based solely upon the fact that he is of Hittite stock. Never mind that David has Moabite blood in his veins.
      ellauri156.html on line 293: Let us briefly review the place of the Hittites in Old Testament history. As early as Genesis 15:18-21, God promised Abram (Abraham) that his descendants would inherit the land of the Hittites (along with that of other peoples as well; see also Exodus 3:8, 17; 13:5; 23:23, 28, 32; 33:21; 34:11; Deuteronomy 7:1; Joshua 1:4; 3:10). Ephron, the man from whom Abraham bought a burial plot for his family, was a Hittite (see Genesis 23:10; 25:9; etc.). Jacob's brother Esau married several Hittite wives (Genesis 26:34-35; 36:2). The Israelites were commanded to utterly destroy the Hittites (Deuteronomy 20:17). The Hittites opposed Israel's entrance into the promised land (see Numbers 13:29; Joshua 9:1: 11;1-5), and the Israelites had some victories over them (Joshua 24;11). Nevertheless, they did not totally remove them and came to live among them (Judges 3:5). When David was fleeing from Saul, he learned that the king was camped nearby. He asked two of his men who would go with him to Saul's camp. One of the two, Abishai, volunteered to go with David, the other man did not. This man was Ahimelech, the Hittite (1 Samuel 26:6). (Eli siis mitä? Pitäskö tästä päätellä nyt jotakin heettien statuxesta vai? Oliko ne jotain neekereitä?)
      ellauri156.html on line 295: It is obvious that Uriah had forsaken his own people and their gods to live in Israel, marry an Israelite woman, and fight in David's army. He is no pagan, to be put to death. He is a proselyte. In spite of all this, I believe David looks down upon him. David has grown accustomed to having the finest of everything. His palace is the finest around. His furnishings, his food, his help, are all the finest. Now, he looks from his penthouse and sees a woman whom he regards as “fine.” How can a woman so “fine” belong to this Hittite? She is fit for a king. And this king intends to have her.
      ellauri156.html on line 297: And so David sends messengers to her, who take her and bring her to him. When she arrives, David sleeps with her, and when she is purified from her uncleanness,38 she returns to her house. That is that. (Mikä uncleanliness? Meneekö Bathsheba Joen Bideniin ja pesee Taavin runkut pois?) If she had not become pregnant, I have little doubt she would never have darkened the door of David's house again. David does not seek a wife in Bathsheba. He does not even seek an affair. He wants one night of sex with this woman, and then he will let Uriah have her. (Häh? Oliko Bathsheba niin huono hoito vai? Eikös sitä olis voinut toistamiseenkin rotkauttaa? Bathshebalta ei nähtävästi mitään kysytty missään vaiheessa. Eikun x-asentoon Taavin sängylle ja melaa mekkoon.)
      ellauri156.html on line 299: The sequence of events, so far as David is concerned, can be enumerated in this way: (1) David stays in Jerusalem; (2) David stays in bed; (3) David sees Bathsheba bathing herself as he walks on his roof; (4) David sends and inquires about this woman; (5) David learns her identity and that she is married to a military hero; (6) David sends messengers to take her and bring her to him; (7) David lays with her; (8) Bathsheba goes back to her home after she purifies herself. This same sequence can be seen in a number of other texts, none of which is commendable. Shechem “saw, took, and lay with” Dinah, the daughter of Jacob in Genesis 34:2. Judah “saw, took, and went in to” the Canaanite woman he made his wife in Genesis 38:2-3. Achan “saw, coveted, and took” the forbidden spoils of war in Joshua 7:21. Samson did virtually the same in Judges 14. Let us not forget that a similar sequence occurred at the first sin when Eve “saw, desired, and took” the forbidden fruit in Genesis 3. (Thanx a lot Bob for this compendium. This will certainly come handy later on, when looking for something fun to read.)
      ellauri156.html on line 301: It is clear from the words of our text that David sinned. It is clear from the actions of David which follow that he sinned. It is clear from the words of God through Nathan that David sinned in a grievous manner. The problem is that many wish to view the text in a way that forces Bathsheba to share David's guilt by assuming that she somehow seduced him. I would like to pursue this matter, because I believe there is absolutely no evidence to support such a conclusion. (Wow! That's a refreshing point of view! Like Ballsack's novel Comment la belle Fille de Portillon quinaulda son iuge.)
      ellauri156.html on line 303: The inference is often drawn that Bathsheba should not have been exposing herself as she did, and that it was her indiscretion which started this whole sequence of events. Some think her actions may have been deliberate (She knew David was there and could see. . . .), while others would be more gracious and assume it was simply poor judgment. Let me point out several things from the text. First and foremost, when Nathan pronounces divine judgment upon David for his sin, Bathsheba and Uriah are depicted as the victims, not the villains. When Adam and Eve sinned, God specifically indicted Adam, Eve, and the serpent, and each received their just curse. This is simply not the case with Bathsheba. Nowhere in the Bible is she indicted for this sin. It may be that the author did not choose to focus upon Bathsheba, but even in this case, the Law would clearly require us to consider her innocent until proven guilty. (Which law? Not biblical law for sure, take for instance Susan's case, where Daniel had to called upon to prove her innocence.)
      ellauri156.html on line 305: It is very clear in Samuel that the tragedies which take place in David's household are the consequence of his sin, just as Nathan indicates (12:10-12). Thus, when Amnon rapes Tamar, the sister of Absalom, it is a case of the “chickens coming home to roost.” Or is it a case of "Rooster coming into the chicks?" Note that it is at David's command or summons that Tamar is called to the palace, and then to Amnon's bedside. There is not so much as a hint that when Tamar is raped, it is all of Amnon's doing. Should this not strongly indicate that the same is true in Bathsheba's case, of which this second incident is a kind of mirror image? (Fucking crooky noses, raping and ravaging their kinky haired ladies right and left.)
      ellauri156.html on line 307: When we read of this incident, we do so through Western eyes. We live in a day when a woman has the legal right to say “No” at any point in a romantic relationship. If the man refuses to stop, that is regarded as a violation of her rights; it is regarded as rape. It didn't work that way for women in the ancient Near East. Lot could offer his virgin daughters to the wicked men of Sodom, to protect strangers who were his guests, and there was not one word of protest from his daughters when he did so (Genesis 19:7-8). Even less later, when they asked their father Lot to fuck them at will. These virgins were expected to obey their father, who was in authority over them. Michal was first given to David as his wife, and then Saul took her back and gave her to another man. And then David took her back (1 Samuel 25:44; 2 Samuel 3:13-16). Apparently Michal had no say in this whole sequence of events. Oh, those days of innocence!
      ellauri156.html on line 309: To approach this same issue from the opposite perspective, think with me about the Book of Esther. When the king summoned his wife, Queen Vashti, to appear (perhaps in a way that would inappropriately display her goodies to the king's guests), she refused. She was removed (see Esther 1:1-22). She did not lose her life, but she was at least replaced by Esther, who had no such compunctions. Then, we read later in this same book that no one could approach the king unless he summoned them. If any approached the king and he did not raise his "scepter", they were put to death (Esther 4:10-11). Does this not portray the way of eastern kings? Does this not explain why Bathsheba went to the king's palace when summoned? Does this help to explain why she seems to have given in to the king's lustful acts? (We do not know what protests -- like Tamar's in chapter 13 -- she may have uttered, but we do have some sense of the powerlessness of a woman in those days, especially when given orders by the king. (Later on it became the requirement that a raped lady should kill herself to save her husband the disgrace of having horns.)
      ellauri156.html on line 311: Now, having looked at the big picture, let's concentrate on the juicy details. The text informs us that David sees this woman bathing and notes that she is very beautiful. It is sometimes thought that David saw Bathsheba unclothed as she bathed herself publicly, and that the sight of her (unclothed/partially) body prompted David to act as he did. Virtually the identical words employed in our text (“very beautiful in appearance”) are found in Genesis 24:16 of Rebekah, as she came to the well with a water jug on her shoulder. She was neither naked nor partially clothed. Similar (though not identical) descriptions are found, where no exposure of the woman is indicated at all (see Genesis 12:11; 26:7; 29:17; Esther 1:1). I believe one of the reasons David summons Bathsheba to his palace is that he has not seen all that he wishes. (Haahaa! Bob, you are a little too bashful here. Most likely he wants to try on what he saw, like St. Thomas who wanted to put his finger in the wound. Seeing is not believing.)
      ellauri156.html on line 313: Let's pursue this matter a little more. (Oh lord, I feel the spirit stirring below my belt.) Bathsheba is bathing herself. (This is about the 4. time Bob invites us to picture this tender moment. There are not too many of them in the Bible, so let us savor it.) We tend to assume that this means she is disrobed, at least partially. I believe Bathsheba is bathing herself in some place normally used for such purposes. Only David, with his penthouse vantage, would be able to see her, and a whole lot of other folks if he chose. The poor do not have the same privacy privileges as the rich. I have seen any number of people bathing themselves on the sidewalks of India, because this is their home. The word for bathing employed here is often used to describe the washing of a guest's hands or feet and for the ceremonial washings of the priests. Abigail used this term when she spoke of washing the feet of David's servants (1 Samuel 25:41). Such washings could be done, with decency, without total privacy. We assume far too much if we assume Abigail is walking about unclothed, in full sight of onlookers.
      ellauri156.html on line 317: 1 Then it happened in the spring, at the time when kings go out to battle, that David sent Joab and his servants with him and all Israel, and they destroyed the sons of Ammon and besieged Rabbah. But David stayed at Jerusalem (emphases mine).
      ellauri156.html on line 319: It is not as if Bathsheba is acting in an unbecoming manner, knowing that men are around. She has every right to assume they are not. David is around, but he should not be. On top of this, she is not bathing herself at high noon; she is bathing herself in the evening. This is when the law prescribed (for ceremonial cleansing), and it is when the sun is setting. In other words, it is nearly dark when Bathsheba sets out to wash herself. David has to crane his neck and use his binoculars to see what he does. I believe Bathsheba makes every effort to assure her modesty, but the king's vantage point is too high, and he is looking with too much zeal. I am suggesting that David is much more of a peeping Tom than Bathsheba is an exhibitionist. I believe the text bears me out on this.
      ellauri156.html on line 321: If I am right in what I have been saying, David's sin becomes that much more wicked. In some instances (if not most), a woman may purposely or unwittingly encourage the one who assaults her. In this case, there is not so much as a hint that this takes place. In fact, if I am reading the story accurately, David's “sighting” of Bathsheba is the result of her keeping the law, while David is failing his responsibilities as king. But not his duties as the king of the apes.
      ellauri156.html on line 323: This passage, even though we have only made our way through the first four verses of it (sadly, the best bits), has much to teach us. Let me seek to summarize some of its lessons.
      ellauri156.html on line 325: First, the root of David's sin is not low self-esteem; it is arrogance. (Since when is low self-esteem a sin? Well I bet it is for American believers. Think of Bill James' Will to Believe.) I am getting quite weary of hearing that the root of all evils is low self-esteem. I wonder why we see nothing of this in the Bible. David's problem is just the opposite. He has become puffed up and arrogant because of his success and status as Israel's king. He has come to see himself as different/better than the rest of the Israelites. They need to go to war; he does not. They need to sleep in the open field; he needs to get his rest in his own bed, in his palace. They can have a wife; he can have whatever woman he wants.
      ellauri156.html on line 327: Second, the nature of David's sin is the abuse of power. Power corrupts, we are told, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. David has come to power. In the previous chapters, David employed his God-given power to defeat the enemies of God and of Israel. He used his power as Israel's king to fill his pockets and void his cullions, and takes advantage of Dog's promise to Saul by restoring to Mephibosheth his family property and by making him a son at his table. Now, David, drunk with his power, uses it to indulge himself at the expense of others. I want you to notice the repetition of the word “send” or “sent” in this chapter. It is a king like David who can send all the men to war but stay home himself (verse 1). It is a king like David who can send people to inquire about Bathsheba, and then to send messengers to “take” her and bring her to his palace (verses 3-4). It is a king like David who can “send” for Uriah and “send” orders to Joab to have him killed. It is a king who "sends" his shlong into Bathsheba's holiest of the holy. David has the power, and he certainly knows how to use it, only now he is using that power for his own benefit, at the expense of others. This is not servant leadership.
      ellauri156.html on line 329: Sexual abuse and sexual harassment are just two of the ways people abuse their power. Parents begin to think they own their children, and that they can use their children to satisfy themselves, so they engage in various forms of abuse, often sexual in nature. Bosses get used to being in control and telling people what to do, and it should not be surprising to learn that they sometimes abuse their power over employees and subordinates to sexually satisfy themselves. This sin is no different from that of David. (Oh, oh, this is too good, my cup runneth over.)
      ellauri156.html on line 331: I must press the point a little further, at the risk of coming off. Of course it is wrong for David to use his power to have sex with another man's wife. But it is not right to abuse power even when sex is permissible. A husband should not abuse his power in order to have sex with his wife. And a wife should not abuse her power (of saying “No,” for example) to punish or put off her husband. (LOL! Bob, you show you true colors here!) Within marriage, sex is simply another area of serving our mate. It is not the opportunity to lord it over our mate. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Jennifer! And you girls as well!
      ellauri156.html on line 335: Conversely, David never did worse than he did in prosperity and power. How many psalms do you think David wrote from his palatial bed and from his penthouse? How much meditation on the law took place while David was in Jerusalem, rather than on the battlefield? On the other hand, how many maidens did he open the psalmbook with on the field? We are not to be masochists, wanting more and more suffering, but on the other hand we should recognize that success is often a greater test than adversity. Often when it appears “everything's goin' my way” we are in the greatest danger of producing some shit like Frank Sinatra's "My Way".
      ellauri156.html on line 339: Fourth, sin is sequential. Sin “happens,” but it seldom “shit just happens.” Sin does not come out of nowhere, just as cum does not come from just anywhere. We see this sequence in the Book of James:
      ellauri156.html on line 341: 13 Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. 14 But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. 15 Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death (James 1:13-15).
      ellauri156.html on line 343: David's sin did not just suddenly appear in a moment of time. David set himself up for this fall. We know he disengaged himself from the battle, choosing instead a life of comfort and ease. You and I may make the same decision, though in a slightly different way. We may choose to ease up in our pursuit of becoming a disciple of our Lord, of the disciplined life which causes us to bring our bodies under our control (see 1 Corinthians 9:24-27).
      ellauri156.html on line 347: Sins of commission are often the result of sins of omission. David committed sin by his adultery with Bathsheba and later by the murder of her husband, but these sins were borne out of David's omissions which came to pass when he stayed home, rather than go to war. These sins of omission are often difficult to recognize in ourselves or others, but they are there. And after a while, they incline us to more open sins, as we see in David.
      ellauri156.html on line 349: Within those of you who are reading this message, I know there are some who have already fallen in the same hole as David. You have already committed adultery. To you, I would say: “Stop now!” How much better it would have been if David had confessed to his sin with Bathsheba before he went on to murder Uriah. Sin is like a cancer: the sooner it is cut out, the better; the longer it is left, the more it grows. If you have fallen as David did (or in some other way), forsake your sin, confess it, find God's forgiveness, and move on to the next.
      ellauri156.html on line 353: Whether you are actively committed to Christ, serving Him as you serve others, using the power (spiritual gifts) God has given you to benefit others? Let us learn from David's omissions, rather than learn (experientially) from his commissions.
      ellauri156.html on line 355: The apostle John (who was Christ's favorite boy) put it this way (lot of dry cleaning in this one, sorry):
      ellauri156.html on line 357: 7 But if we walk in the light as he himself is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his son cleanses us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar and his word is not in us (1 John 1:7-9).
      ellauri156.html on line 361: 4 Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness. 5 You know that he appeared in order to take away sins; and in him there is no sin. 6 No one who abides in him sins; no one who sins has seen him or knows him. 7 Little children, make sure no one deceives you; the one who practices righteousness is righteous, just as he is righteous; 8 the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. (Don't believe Milton, he's got it all wrong.) the son of god appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil. 9 No one who is born of god practices sin, because his seed (zihi) abides in him; and he cannot sin if he tried, because he is born of dog (1 John 3:4-9).
      ellauri156.html on line 365: This reference to Bathsheba’s “purification” is interesting and perplexing. The King James Version reads, “and he lay with her; for she was purified from her uncleanness: and she returned unto her house” at verse 4. The New King James Version is slightly different: “and he lay with her, for she was cleansed from her impurity; and she returned to her house” (note the change from a semi-colon to a comma, and from a colon to a semi-colon). The NIV reads, “and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.)” The NRSV reads, “and he lay with her. (Now she was purifying herself after her period. Or was it colon? Only David knows, and Dog of course, but they don't tell.).”
      ellauri156.html on line 374: Aika hemmetisti kyyhkypaisteja papille, kun jokainen menstruoiva nainen tuo niitä sille 2kpl/kk. Pappi pysyy hyvin selvillä seurakuntalaisten varmoista päivistä. Hmm. Jos Bathsheban kuukkixet oli ohize jo vähintään viikko sitten, kohtahan sillä oli ovulaatio, eikäpä ihme että Taavi-enon mälli teki heti tehtävänsä. Vaikka mä en kyllä usko eze jäi siihen yhteen kertaan. (2) When did this cleansing occur, and when was it completed? Was Bathsheba’s bathing which David witnessed part of her ceremonial cleansing? If so, there may have had to be a delay before the Law permitted intercourse. Otherwise, David would have caused her to violate the Law pertaining to cleansing, since it may not have been complete. The translations which make her cleansing a past, (continued) completed event seem to be suggesting that she was now legally able to engage in intercourse, though certainly not with David. If she was still in the process of her cleansing, David’s sin of adultery is compounded because it was committed at the wrong time, while cleansing was still in process. It is also possible to read the text (as does the NASB) to say that Bathsheba waited at David’s house until she was ceremonially clean from her evening with David. It is interesting that nothing is said of David waiting until he was cleansed. The inference I take from this “cleansing” reference is that Bathsheba was still concerned about keeping the Law of Moses, even if David was not. Big fat hairy diff.
      ellauri156.html on line 380: It was the clumsy attempt to cover up the petty crime which led to Watergate. Richard Nixon, the President of the United States, was forced to resign to avoid impeachment. A number of his closest associates were indicted, convicted, and sentenced to brief prison terms. Not Tricky Dick, of course, he went scot free. Nain on meidankin elamassamme! Ja Daavidin!
      ellauri156.html on line 382: Throughout history, many attempts have been made to cover up incompetence, immorality, and crimes. In the Bible, cover-ups appear very early. Adam and Eve sought to cover their nakedness and to hide from God, not realizing their slimy fig leaves betrayed their sin and guilt.
      ellauri156.html on line 384: Our lesson from 2 Samuel 11 is one of the great cover-up attempts of all time, and like so many, it too fails miserably. Our previous lesson attempted to explain David's sin with Bathsheba in a way that placed the guilt squarely upon David, and not upon Bathsheba. This was all of David's doing, not due to temptation or seduction on Bathsheba's part, but because of arrogance, lust, and greed on David's part.
      ellauri156.html on line 386: David had no desire for Bathsheba to become his wife, or even to carry on an adulterous affair with her (a mitigating circumstance). He sought one night's pleasure, and she went home. That was that, or so it seemed. But then David received word from Bathsheba that this one night resulted in Bathsheba's pregnancy. Our text takes up here with the account of David's desperate attempt to cover up his sin with Bathsheba. As we all know, it did not work, and it only made matters worse.
      ellauri156.html on line 388: The story of David and Uriah reminds me of the story of the “Sorcerer's Apprentice.” It has been awhile, but as I remember the plot (probably the Walt Disney version), the sorcerer goes away, leaving his apprentice behind to do his chores. The apprentice gets the bright idea that the work would be a whole lot easier if he used his master's magical arts so he could sit back and watch other powers at work. The problem was that he didn't know how to stop what he started, and so more and more helpers came on the scene as the apprentice tried to reverse the process. The worst was when Mickey tried to cleave the broom with an axe, and got instead a million of smaller brooms.
      ellauri156.html on line 390: At this point in time, David's life is very similar. He begins to stack one sin upon another, certain that each one will somehow wipe out visibility of the previous sin. Instead, his sins only multiply. More and more people become aware of his sin, and a cover up becomes impossible. Many lessons can be learned from this tragic episode of David's life, which if heeded, will help us duplicate them in our lives. May the Spirit of God open our ears and our hearts to listen and learn from David's attempt to cover up his sin with Bathsheba, so that you can avoid some of his mistakes and do a better job.
      ellauri156.html on line 392: In our first lesson, we devoted our attention to the first four verses of chapter 11, which depict David's sin of adultery with Bathsheba. Pretty unbelievable that I got a whole four pages out of it. The trick is was to keep repeating the juicy bit about Bathsheba washing herself before (or after) David's load. I sought to demonstrate that this sin was all of David's doing. The author points his accusing finger at David, not Bathsheba. It was not Bathsheba's indiscretion in bathing herself (as I understand this story), for she was simply obeying the ritual of purification outlined in the law. It was David who, by means of his lofty elevation and view, looked inappropriately at Bathsheba, washing herself,violating her privacy. I endeavored to demonstrate that David's sin with Bathsheba was the result of a sequence of wrong decisions and attitudes on David's part. In one sense, being on the path he was, his destination (of adultery, or something like it) was to be expected. His sins of omission finally blossomed and came into full bloom.
      ellauri156.html on line 394: One of the tragic aspects of our story is that the sequence of sin in David's life does not end with his adulterous union with Bathsheba. It leads to a deceptive plot to make her husband Uriah appear to be the father of David's child with Bathsheba and culminates in David's murder of Uriah and his marriage to Uriah's wife, Bathsheba. As we take up where we left off in our last lesson, a few more bits of background information are vital to our understanding of this text.
      ellauri156.html on line 396: (1) It seems likely that David and Uriah are hardly strangers, but that they know each other, to some degree at least. Uriah is listed among the mighty warriors of David (2 Samuel 23:39; 1 Chronicles 11:41). Some of the “mighty men” came to David early, while he was in the cave of Adullam (1 Samuel 22:1-2), and we suspect that among them were Joab, Abishai, and Asahel, the three brothers who were mighty men (see 2 Samuel 23:18, 24; 1 Chronicles 11:26).39 Others joined David at Ziklag (1 Chronicles 12:1ff.), and still other great warriors joined with David at Hebron (1 Chronicles 12:38-40).40 We do not know when and where Uriah joined with David, but since his military career ends in 2 Samuel 12, his military feats must have been done earlier. It seems very unlikely that David and Uriah are strangers; rather, it would seem these two men know each other from fighting together, and perhaps even from fleecing Saul together, or maybe Uriah had been a dear brother to David like his old Jonathan.
      ellauri156.html on line 398: (2) It seems unlikely that Uriah is ignorant of what David has done and of what he is trying to accomplish by calling him home to Jerusalem. Rumors must have been circulating around Jerusalem about David and Bathsheba, and could easily have reached the Israelite army which had besieged Rabbah. Uriah not only refuses to go to his house and sleep with his wife, he sleeps at the doorway of the king's house, in the midst of his servants. He has many witnesses to testify that any child borne by his wife during this time is not his child. It is clear that Uriah understands exactly what David wants him to do (to have sex with his wife), and that he refuses, even when the king virtually orders him to do so. One finds this difficult to explain if Uriah is ignorant of what happened between David and Bathsheba. At least Uriah knows what David is trying to get him to do on this stay in Jerusalem. The implications of all this we will explore later.
      ellauri156.html on line 400: (3) Bathsheba is not said to have any part in David's scheme to deceive Uriah or to bring about his death, much less any knowledge of what David is doing. When she informs David that she is pregnant, David takes decisive action, but nowhere are we told that Bathsheba has a part in his schemes. Verse 26 makes it sound as though she learns of Uriah's death after the fact, through normal channels. After all, would David really want his new wife to know he murdered her husband? David acts without Bathsheba's help.
      ellauri156.html on line 402: It looks as though Bathsheba never enters David's mind after their encounter described in verses 1-4. It certainly does not seem that David wants to continue the relationship, to carry on an affair, or to marry her. David simply puts this sinful event out of his mind, until a messenger is sent by Bathsheba informing the king that his night of passion has produced a child. Bathsheba informs David that she is pregnant, not that she is afraid she might be. This means that she has missed at least one period and probably another. All in all, several weeks or more have passed. It will not be long before her pregnancy will become obvious to anyone who looks at her. This is David's sin and his responsibility, and so she informs him.
      ellauri156.html on line 404: David has two plans, Plan A, and failing that, Plan B. Here he is very like his master, the Dog, who also has very analogous two plans for his proteges: Plan A, take them to his fold if they obey him, and Plan B: throw them to the dogs (the bad hounds of the hell) if they don't.
      ellauri156.html on line 408: David's plan A is simple and, at least in his mind, foolproof. In short, David will entice Uriah to think and to act as he himself has done. David does not wish to endure the adversities of the war with Rabbah, and so he goes to Jerusalem, to his home, and to his bed. He does not wish to deny himself, so he takes the wife of another man and sleeps with her. David will give Uriah the same opportunity, except that it will be his own wife he will sleep with. Not as fun, one must admit. After Uriah has sexual relations with Bathsheba, all will conclude that he is the father of the child which has been conceived by David's sinful act. Only one thing is wrong with David's plan: he assumes Uriah is as spiritually apathetic as he, and that he will act to indulge himself, rather than act like a soldier at war and keep his sword in the sheath.
      ellauri156.html on line 410: David sends word to Joab, ordering him to send Uriah home to Jerusalem. I take it from the context that Uriah is sent to Jerusalem on the pretext that he is needed to report directly to David on the state of the war. I doubt David wants Uriah to know he has ordered Joab to send him. I am certain David does not want Uriah to know the real purpose of his journey to Jerusalem. David is orchestrating this homecoming to appear as though it serves one purpose, while it actually serves David's purpose of concealing his own sin. Even at this level, the order for Uriah to return home has a bad odor. You may remember that when David's father wanted to know how the battle with the Philistines was going (three of his sons were involved), he sent David, the youngest son, as an errand boy to take some supplies and return with word about the war (1 Samuel 17:17-19). One does not need to send a military hero as a messenger (nor is it good practice, the youngest son is more expendable.).
      ellauri156.html on line 412: I should also add that Joab is already being drawn into the conspiracy. Joab obeys David's command to send Uriah, and my guess is that Joab knows something is up. He may even have heard about David's liaison with Bathsheba. When he sends Uriah to Jerusalem, he has to give him some mission, some task to perform. Joab and Uriah may have sensed that this was no “mission impossible” (as you would give a mighty warrior), but that is a “mission incredible.” In any case, the web of deceit and deception is already being woven, and more people are being drawn into the conspiracy. Wow, this is prime material for a soap opera. Maybe there already is one, must check. OF COURSE there is:
      ellauri156.html on line 415: David and Bathsheba is a 1951 historical Technicolor epic film about King David made by 20th Century Fox. It was directed by King Saul, produced by Dog, a.k.a. Zanuck, from a screenplay by Philip Dunno. The cinematography was by Leon Shameonyou. Gregory Peck stars as King David and the film follows King David's life as he adjusts to ruling as a King, and about his relationship with Uriah's wife Bathsheba, played by Susan Wayward. Goliath of Gath was portrayed by 203 cm-tall (6'8") Lithuanian wrestler Walter Talun. These days Walter would no longer get a bench seat in a high-school basketball team.
      ellauri156.html on line 417: King David was the second king of Israel and this film is based on the second book of Samuel from the Bible. When the second Ark of the Covenant is brought to Jerusalem, a soldier reaches out to steady it and is struck dead. While the prophet Nathan declares this the will of God, a skeptical David pronounces it the result of a combination of an electrical shock and too much wine. This blasphemy starts David on the path of sin.
      ellauri156.html on line 419: As a consequence, David becomes attracted to Bathsheba who is the wife of Uriah, one of David's soldiers. The attraction is mutual although both know an affair would break the law of Moses. When Bathsheba discovers she is pregnant by David, the King sends for Uriah hoping he will spend time with his wife to cover her pregnancy. David's wife Michal who is aware of the affair, tells David that Uriah did not go home but slept at the castle as a sign of loyalty to his King. LOL, a sign of "fuck you" pointed at Dave with Uriah's middle finger without a nail.
      ellauri156.html on line 421: Frustrated, David orders Uriah to be placed on the battle's front and for the troops to withdraw leaving him to die. Uriah is reported dead and David sends a dispatch to tell Bathsheba so they can plan their marriage. Nathan Zuckermann the prophet advises David the people are dissatisfied with his leadership and desire his sons to rule. Nathan tells David he has forgotten that he is a servant of the Lord. David tries in vain to cheer up the old retard. David marries Bathsheba.
      ellauri156.html on line 423: As a result, a drought hits Israel. David's and Bathsheba's baby dies. Nathan returns to tell David that God is displeased with his sin. Dog wants to see better ones, with more pizzazz. Or else he will not die as the law demands, but he will be punished through misfortune in his family. David takes responsibility but insists Bathsheba is blameless. But the people want Bathsheba killed. The crowd shouts: No, we want Barabbas! David makes plans to save Bathsheba, but she tells David she is not blameless. She has continued seeing Uriah on the side. (The reports of his demise were premature.) They are both at fault. David is reminded of the Lord and quotes Psalm 23 as he plays his harp. (A nice musical interlude in an otherwise numbing show whose spoiler is long since spoiled.)
      ellauri156.html on line 425: David promises Bathsheba she will not die and is willing to accept God's justice for himself, knowing that he as the hero of the book is safe. Repentant, David, seeking relief from the drought and forgiveness reaches out to touch the Ark presuming that he will die of heat stroke (or was it a short?) like the soldier. A clap of thunder is heard and there are flashbacks to David's youth depicting his anointing by Samuel and his battle with Goliath. King David removes his hands from the Ark as rain falls on the dry land. Screenwriter Dunno said he "left it to the audience to decide if the blessed rain came as the result of divine intervention or simply of a low-pressure system moving in from the Mediterranean." Well it could be both, couldn't it?
      ellauri156.html on line 431: David was about thirty when he began to reign (2 Samuel 5:4), so we can look for a birth date, which according to the pattern of other proposed birth dates in this series should occur both on a Hebrew holy day, at least some other sacred calendars, and also on a date similar on some calendars to his death date. Those requirements are so stringent to occur in a given year that if we find such a date, it is highly likely to be correct. Moreover, in nearly every case so far, the birth date is more impressive than the death date, and David's proposed death date is a sacred day on 4 calendars (also being 1 Condor on the Sacred Round).
      ellauri156.html on line 433: Searching for a possible birth date for David produces an ideal candidate, a holy day on 6 of the 7 known sacred calendars. The day Sat 4 Jul 1057 BC was 17 Tammuz (H), 14 Sum (Enoch, Summer Fast), 1 Res (V), 1 Bir (M), 1 Deer (SR), and 1 Jac (Easter on Priest). That Hebrew day is known simply as the Fast of the Fourth Month, which the Lord says will become a day of rejoicing some day (Zech. 8:19). That date ranks with the best birth dates found so far for the prophets. It is identical on the Venus and Mercury calendars to Isaac Bashevis Singer's birthday. This date fits the pattern so well of all the great prophets, as it should to be in Matthew's chain of key links to Christ, that it confirms this whole set of dates as being correct, including the Biblical assertion that the temple was built in the 480th year of the Exodus.
      ellauri156.html on line 442: Dunno says his original conception was for a film that would encompass David's life and go into three main chapters: David as a boy fighting Goliath; a more mature David and his friendship with Jonathan, ending with the affair with Bathsheba; and an older David and his relationship with his son Absalom. Dunno wrote a treatment which he estimated would make a four hour movie. Zanuck was not enthusiastic so Dunno then pitched the idea of doing a film just on David and Bathsheba, which Zanuck loved.
      ellauri156.html on line 451: A. H. Weiler of The New York Times described the film as "a reverential and sometimes majestic treatment of chronicles that have lived three millennia." He praised Dunno's screenplay and Peck's "authoritative performance" but found that Wayward "seems closer to Hollywood than to the arid Jerusalem of his Bible." Variety wrote, "This is a big picture in every respect. It has scope, pageantry, sex (for all its Biblical background), cast names, color—everything. It's a surefire boxoffice entry, one of the really 'big' pictures of the new selling season." Philip K. Scheuer of the Los Angeles Times wrote that the film "leaves little to be desired" from the standpoint of production values with Peck "ingratiating" as David and Wayward "a seductress with flaming tresses, in or out of the bath, and only her final contrition is a little difficult to believe." Richard L. Coe of The Washington Post wrote, "On the whole, the picture suggests a Reader's Digest story expanded into a master's thesis for the Ecole Copacabana."] Harrison's Reports wrote, "The outstanding thing about the production is the magnificent performance of Gregory Peck as David; he makes the characterization real and human, endowing it with all the shortcomings of a man who lusts for another's wife, but who is seriously penitent and prepared to shoulder his guilt. Susan Wayward, as Bathsheba, is beautiful and sexy, but her performance is of no dramatic consequence." The Monty Python Bulletin commented that the film had been made "with restraint and relative simplicity" compared to other historical epics, "and the playing of Gregory Peck in particular is competent. The whole film, however, is emotionally and stylistically quite unworthy of its subject." Philip Hamburger of The New Yorker wrote that "the accessories notwithstanding, something is ponderously wrong with 'David and Bathsheba.' The fault lies, I suppose, in the attempt to make excessive enlargements of an essentially-simple story." Zanuck the Hot Dog agreed.
      ellauri156.html on line 453: The film sparked protests in Singapore over what the Muslim community considered an unflattering portrait of David, considered an important prophet in Islam, as a hedonist susceptible to sexual overtures. Mohammed and his 9-year old wife would have been outraged.
      ellauri156.html on line 455: King Solomon, author of The Ancient World in the Cinema, found the film rather slow-paced in the first half before gaining momentum, and Peck "convincing as a once-heroic monarch who must face an angry constituency and atone for his sins." He noted that this was different from other biblical epics in that the protagonist faced a religious and philosophical issue rather than the overdone military or physical crisis.
      ellauri156.html on line 459: The commercial ended with a message for viewers to vote for Johnson in the election. The commercial implied that if Johnson's opponent, Barry Goldwater won the election, Goldwater would recklessly start a nuclear war that would kill the girl (and by extension, the viewer's own children) although Goldwater's name was not mentioned, his voice in not heard and his image was not shown during any point of the commercial. This commercial and its airing was a major factor in Johnson's landslide victory over Goldwater, with Johnson receiving 486 electoral votes to Goldwater's 52.
      ellauri156.html on line 465: When Uriah arrives in Jerusalem, he reports to David, who acts out the charade he has planned. He asks Uriah about the “welfare of Joab and the people,” and the “state of the war.” It troubles me that David needs such a report at all. If he were with his men in the field, this would not be necessary. But even worse, David does not really care about Joab, the people, or the war. David's one preoccupation is to cover up his sin, to get Uriah home and to bed with his wife, and thus to get David off the hook. How sad to read of David's hypocrisy. The king who had compassion on the crippled son of Jonathan now lacks compassion for the whole army, and specifically for Bathsheba and her husband Uriah.
      ellauri156.html on line 467: David goes through all the right motions with Uriah. He listens to his reports, and then he gives him the night off, some time to go to his house and “wash his feet.” David is not worried about this soldier's personal hygiene; he is worried about his own reputation. When one entered his house, he usually took off his shoes and washed his feet, in preparation for eating and for going to bed. David very delicately encourages this man to go home and go to bed with his wife. Uriah knows it; our author knows it; and we know it.
      ellauri156.html on line 469: Uriah leaves David's presence. Now David adds a further touch. He sends a “present from the king” after, or with, Uriah. How we would love to know just what that “gift” was. Was it a night for two at the Jerusalem Hilton? Was it dinner and dancing at a romantic restaurant? I think we can safely say this: (1) We are not told what the present was. (2) We are not supposed to know, or it would not add to the story for us to know what it was. (3) Whatever it was, it was very carefully planned to facilitate David's scheme of getting Uriah to bed with his wife, as quickly as possible.
      ellauri156.html on line 471: Uriah has to understand what the king is suggesting. Who wouldn't want to go home and enjoy his wife after some time of separation, thanks to the war with the Ammonites? Instead, we are told that Uriah never leaves the king's house. He sleeps in the doorway of the king's house, in the presence of a number of the king's servants. I am inclined to understand that at least some of these servants, if not all of them, are the king's bodyguards (compare 1 Kings 14:27-28). Uriah is a soldier. He has been called to his king's presence, away from the battle. But as a faithful servant of the king, he will not enjoy a night alone with his wife; instead, he will join with those who guard the king's life. This is the way he can serve his king in Jerusalem, and so this is what he chooses to do rather than to go home. The irony is overwhelming. The king's faithful soldier spends the night guarding the 50% new life of the king in his wife's womb, the king who has taken his own wife in the night, and who will soon take his life as well. Dramatic irony.
      ellauri156.html on line 475: On to plan B. David has his spies watching Uriah as though he is the enemy. (Well, he is a rival all right.) They know what David wants; he wants Uriah to go home and sleep with his wife. If they do not know all of the details of what David has done with Bathsheba (which is hard to believe) and what he intends to accomplish by Uriah's visit, they certainly know something out of the ordinary is taking place. One way or the other, David is making these servant-spies co-conspirators with him.
      ellauri156.html on line 477: The servant-spies come to David in the morning with an amazing report: “He didn't do it. He didn't even go home!” David then seeks to gently rebuke Uriah. The hypocrisy of David's actions and words are hard to accept. But accept we must, for Dave is Dog's favorite horse on whose nose he is betting his bottom dollar.
      ellauri156.html on line 479: He (David, not Dog this time) plays the role of a benevolent master. Uriah, his servant, has “come home from a journey” (verse 10). Is this not the time for him to concern himself with his needs and desires? Is this not the time to concern himself with his wife's needs? How insensitive of Uriah not to go home to be with his wife and to sleep with her. “Shame on you, Uriah!” Uriah has a lot of explaining to do, and so it seems has David.
      ellauri156.html on line 481: And explain he does; Uriah's words to his commander-in-chief are as stinging a rebuke as David receives from Nathan in the next chapter. Uriah clearly understands that what David once encouraged him to do (i.e. go to be with his wife) he is now strongly urging -- even commanding -- him to do. Uriah humbly but steadfastly refuses to do this:
      ellauri156.html on line 483: Uriah said to David, “The ark and Israel and Judah are staying in temporary shelters, and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are camping in the open field. Shall I then go to my house to eat and to drink and to lie with my wife? By your life and the life of your soul, I will not do this thing” (2 Samuel 11:11).
      ellauri156.html on line 485: Uriah first points out to David that his terminology is inaccurate. David speaks of Uriah returning from a journey (verse 10). The truth is that Uriah has been called from the field of battle. He is not a traveling salesman, home from a road trip; he is a soldier, away from his post. In heart and soul, Uriah is still with his fellow-soldiers. He really wants to be back in the field of battle, and not in Jerusalem. He will return as soon as David releases him (see verse 12). Until that time, he will think and act like the soldier he is. As much as possible, he will live the way his fellow-soldiers are living on the field of battle. There, surrounding the city of Rabbah, are the Israelite soldiers, led by Joab. They, along with the ark of the Lord, are camping in tents in the open field. Uriah cannot, Uriah will not, live in luxury while they live sacrificially. He will not sleep with his wife until they can all sleep with her, not just Dave.
      ellauri156.html on line 487: With all due respect, Uriah declines -- indeed Uriah refuses -- to do that which would be conduct unbefitting a soldier, let alone a war hero. I think it is important to see that there is no specific command here which Uriah refuses to disobey. To my knowledge, there is no specific law in the Law of Moses which commands a soldier to have sex with women during times of war. (This may have been true in the earlier days of Israel's history, there would not have been another generation of Israelites otherwise, since Israel was almost constantly at war with one of their neighbors.) This is the conviction of Uriah as a soldier, and he will not violate his conscience by deceiving his fellow men in tights, even when commanded to do so by the king.
      ellauri156.html on line 489: To fully grasp the impact of Uriah's words, let us lick our fingers and turn back a few pages in Samuel's writings to recall David's own words, spoken to Ahimelech the priest, as they relate to this encounter with Uriah:
      ellauri156.html on line 493: You may remember that when David first fled from Saul he went to Ahimelech the priest and asked for some provisions and a sword. The priest had nothing but the sacred bread, which he would allow David and his men to eat, if they had only “kept themselves from women” (verse 4). The priest assumes they may have conducted themselves otherwise. David's answer, and especially the tone of it, is very pertinent to our text. He confidently assured the priest that he and his men had kept themselves from women, almost incensed that the priest would think otherwise. And the reason David gives is that he and his men are on a mission for the king. The inference is that this is a military (or at least official) mission.
      ellauri156.html on line 495: Now here is a most amazing thing. David, years earlier, was adamant about the fact that those on a mission for the king should keep themselves from sexual intercourse. Now, years later, David is amazed that a man on a mission for the king is willing to abstain from sexual intercourse with his wife. Worse yet, David sets out to convince -- even to compel -- Uriah to go to do so, even though it will cause him to violate his conscience. This is not “causing a weaker brother to stumble;” this is cutting off a stronger brother's "leg" at the knob. Uriah is an example of the commitment expected of every soldier, and of David in particular -- at least the David of the past. Uriah is now acting like the David we knew from earlier days. Uriah is the “David” that David should be. But there is a crucial difference: now David is the king. This makes the case completely different.
      ellauri156.html on line 497: Uriah's words should have shocked David into a realization of the depth of his sin. The author uses these words in an ironically pivotal way. Uriah has just told David that he will not go to his own house, that he will not eat and drink and sleep with his wife.41 He has put this matter emphatically: “By your life, and the life of your soul, I will not do this thing” (verse 11). In the very next verses, David compels Uriah to “eat and drink” with him, with the hope that he will lie with his wife. And when Uriah swears by the life of the king that he will not do so, the king ends up taking Uriah's life. How ironic! How tragic! How hilarious!
      ellauri156.html on line 501: David is getting desperate. David has not even entertained the possibility that Uriah will refuse his offer. Uriah speaks with such conviction, David knows that he will never violate his duty as a soldier with all of his mental faculties. David lands upon one last modification to his original plan -- get Uriah drunk and then into bed with his wife. After all, don't people do things when they are drunk that they will not do when sober? This will surely bring about David's intended outcome.
      ellauri156.html on line 503: It must be with great apprehension that Uriah joins David for dinner this last night in Jerusalem. David begins to eat and to drink, and he will not take no for an answer when he offers food and drink to Uriah. Eventually, it works, for David makes sure that Uriah has enough alcohol in his system to make him drunk. And in this condition, David sends Uriah home to “sleep it off,” in his own bed, of course. Even drunk, Uriah will not violate his wife! Unheard of! Once again, Uriah spends the night at the doorway of David's house, along with his servants. He does not go to his own house, and thus he does not sleep with his wife. David is in deep shit.
      ellauri156.html on line 507: David has set out on a course of action that backfires. He intends to put Uriah in a position that will make it appear that he is the father of Bathsheba's child. But Uriah's conduct has publicly exhibited his loyalty to his duties as a soldier, making it more than evident that he cannot possibly be the father of this child. It is worse for David now than it had been when he summoned Uriah to Jerusalem. David concludes -- wrongly -- that his only course of action now is to have Uriah killed in action. I don't know that David actually thinks he can deceive the people of Jerusalem as to whose child Bathsheba's baby is. How can he when everyone knows Uriah has never been with his wife to get her pregnant? It seems now as though David is simply trying to legitimize his sin. By making Uriah a casualty of war, he makes Bathsheba a widow. He can now marry this woman and raise the child as his own, which of course it is. Finally, a plan that makes sense.
      ellauri156.html on line 509: It must be an agonizing night for David, seeing that even drunk Uriah is a better man than he. But not a better pecker! And so in the morning, David acts. He writes a letter to Joab, which will serve as Uriah's death warrant. In this letter David clearly orders Joab to murder Uriah for him. He even tells him how to do so in a way that might conceal the truth of the matter. In so doing, David can honor Uriah as a war hero, and magnanimously take on the duty of being a husband to Uriah's wife, also taking care of the child she is soon to bear. Joab is to put Uriah on the front lines of battle, at the fiercest place of battle, no surprise for a man of his military skills and courage. Joab is to attack and then retreat in such a way as to make Uriah an easy target for the Ammonites, thus assuring his death. There is no mistaking David's orders to Uriah: he wants Uriah killed in a way which makes it look like a simple casualty of war. Joab complies completely with David's orders (why? Is Uriah a creep?), and Uriah is eliminated, no longer an obstacle to David's plans. In giving this order to Joab, David makes him a part of this conspiracy, making him share the guilt for the spilled blood of Uriah. David's sin continues to encompass more and more people, leading to greater and greater sin.
      ellauri156.html on line 511: In all likelihood, this was all in a day's work for the Israeli army even then. So it is not strange to see David, the mighty man of valor, (1 Samuel 16:18) dealing with Uriah, another mighty man of valor, like the enemy. Here is Uriah, a man who will give his life for his king (but not his wife? Did David even ask?), and David, a man who is now willing to take Uriah's life to cover his sin. We all know that it doesn’t work. (Actually, we all know that it works perfectly: David will be honored by posterity as the best Israeli king ever.) How strange it is to see David making Joab his partner in crime, especially after what Joab has done to li'l Abner:
      ellauri156.html on line 513: 26 When Joab came out from David, he sent messengers after Abner, and they brought him back from the well of Sirah; but David did not know it. 27 So when Abner returned to Hebron, Joab took him aside into the middle of the gate to speak with him privately, and there he struck him in the belly so that he died on account of the blood of Asahel his brother. 28 Afterward when David heard it, he said, “I and my kingdom are innocent before the LORD forever of the blood of Abner the son of Ner. 29 “May it fall on the head of Joab and on all his father's house; and may there not fail from the house of Joab one who has a discharge, or who is a leper, or who takes hold of a distaff, or who falls by the sword, or who lacks bread.” 30 So Joab and Abishai his brother killed Abner because he had put their brother Asahel to death in the battle at Gibeon (2 Samuel 3:26-30).
      ellauri156.html on line 516: Who the heck is Abner? The only one that comes to mind is Li'l Abner. Abnerista ei ole suomalaista wikisivua. On tyydyttävä jenkkeihin, vaikka se ei ole oikein tyydyttävää. In the Hebrew Bible, Abner (Hebrew: אַבְנֵר‎ 'Avner) was the cousin of King Saul and the commander-in-chief of his army. His name also appears as אבינר בן נר‎ "Abiner son of Ner", where the longer form Abiner means "my father is Ner".
      ellauri156.html on line 518: Abner is initially mentioned incidentally in Saul's history, first appearing as the son of Ner, Saul's uncle, and the commander of Saul's army. He then comes to the story again as the commander who introduced David to Saul following David's killing of Goliath. He is not mentioned in the account of the disastrous battle of Gilboa when Saul's power was crushed. Seizing the youngest but only surviving of Saul's sons, Ish-bosheth, also called Eshbaal, Abner set him up as king over Israel at Mahanaim, east of the Jordan. David, who was accepted as king by Judah alone, was meanwhile reigning at Hebron, and for some time war was carried on between the two parties.
      ellauri156.html on line 520: The only engagement between the rival factions which is told at length is noteworthy, inasmuch as it was preceded by an encounter at Gibeon between twelve chosen men from each side, in which the whole twenty-four seem to have perished. In the general engagement which followed, Abner was defeated and put to flight. He was closely pursued by Asahel, brother of Joab, who is said to have been "light of foot as a wild roe". As Asahel would not desist from the pursuit, though warned, Abner "was compelled" to slay him "in self-defence". This originated a deadly feud between the leaders of the opposite parties, for Joab, as next of kin to Asahel, was by the law and custom of the country the avenger of his blood.
      ellauri156.html on line 522: However, according to Josephus, in Antiquities, Book 7, Chapter 1, Joab had forgiven Abner for the death of his brother, Asahel, the reason being that Abner had slain Asahel honorably in combat after he had first warned Asahel and tried to knock the wind out of him with the butt of his "spear". However, probably by intervention of God, his obtuse tool went through Asahel. The Bible says everyone stopped and gawked. That shows that something like this never happened before. This battle was part of a civil war between David and Ish-bosheth, the son of Saul. After this battle Abner switched to the side of David and granted him control over the tribe of Benjamin. This act put Abner in David's favor.
      ellauri156.html on line 524: For some time afterward the war was carried on, the advantage being invariably on the side of David. At length, Ish-bosheth lost the main prop of his tottering cause by accusing Abner of sleeping with Rizpah, one of Saul's concubines, an alliance which, according to contemporary notions, would imply pretensions to the throne. Starhill stablessa oli muuten issikkatamma nimeltä Rispa. Kukahan senkin kanssa nukkui öisin tallissa?
      ellauri156.html on line 526: Abner was indignant at the rebuke, and immediately opened negotiations with David, who welcomed him on the condition that his wife Michal should be restored to him. This was done, and the proceedings were ratified by a feast where Rizpah and Michal were the lights of the party. Almost immediately after, however, Joab, who had been sent away, perhaps intentionally returned and slew Abner at the gate of Hebron. The ostensible motive for the assassination was a desire to avenge Asahel, and this would be a sufficient justification for the deed according to the extremely low moral standard of the time (although Abner should have been safe from such a revenge killing in Hebron, which was a City of Refuge). The conduct of David after the event was such as to show that he had no complicity in the act, though he could not venture to punish its perpetrators.
      ellauri156.html on line 528: David had Abner buried in Hebron, as it states in Samuel 3:31-32,[10] "And David said to all the people who were with him, 'Remove your clothes and gird yourselves with this sackcloth taking turns, and wail before me and Li'l Abner.' And King David went after the beer. And they buried Abner in Hebron, and the king raised his voice and wept on Abner's grave, and all the people wept."
      ellauri156.html on line 537: Abner was the son of the witch of En-dor in Mordor, (Pirḳe R. El. xxxiii.), and the hero par excellence in the Haggadah (Yalḳ., Jer. 285; Eccl. R. on ix. 11; Ḳid. 49b). Conscious of his extraordinary strength, he exclaimed: "If I could only catch hold of the earth, I could shake it" (Yalḳ. l.c.)—a saying which parallels the famous utterance of Archimedes, "Had I a fulcrum, I could move the world." (Dote moi pa bo kai tan gan kino.) According to the Midrash (Eccl. R. l.c.) it would have been easier to move a wall six yards thick than one of the feet of Abner, who could hold the Israelitish army between his knees, and often did. Yet when his time came [date missing], Joab smote him. But even in his dying hour, Abner seized his foe's balls like a ball of thread, threatening to crush them. Then the Israelites came and pleaded for Joab's jewels, saying: "If thou crushest them his future kids shall be orphaned, and our women and all our belongings will become a prey to the Philistines." Abner answered: "What can I do? He has extinguished my light" (has wounded me fatally). The Israelites replied: "Entrust thy cause to the true judge [God]." Then Abner released his hold upon Joab's balls and fell dead to the ground (Yalḳ. l.c.).
      ellauri156.html on line 539: His One Sin: The rabbis agree that Abner deserved this violent death, though opinions differ concerning the exact nature of the sin that entailed so dire a punishment on one who was, on the whole, considered a "righteous man" (Gen. R. lxxxii. 4). Some reproach him that he did not use his influence with Saul to prevent him from murdering the priests of Nob (Yer. Peah, i. 16a; Lev. R. xxvi. 2; Sanh. 20a)—convinced as he was of the innocence of the priests and of the propriety of their conduct toward David, Abner holding that as leader of the army David was privileged to avail himself of the Urine and Thumbeline (I Sam. xxii. 9-19). Instead of contenting himself with passive resistance to Saul's command to murder the priests (Yalḳ., Sam. 131), Abner ought to have tried to restrain the king by the balls. Others maintain that Abner did make such an attempt, but in vain (Saul had not enough to get a proper hold of), and that his one sin consisted in that he delayed the beginning of David's reign over Israel by fighting him after Saul's death for two years and a half (Sanh. l.c.). Others, again, while excusing him for this—in view of a tradition founded on Gen. xlix. 27, according to which there were to be two kings of the house of Benjamin—blame Abner for having prevented a reconciliation between Saul and David on the occasion when the latter, in holding on to the skirt of Saul's robe (I Sam. xxiv. 11), showed how unfounded was the king's mistrust of him, seeing Saul had no balls to speak of. Old Saul was inclined to be happy with a pacifier; but Abner, representing to him that the naked David might have found a piece of garment anywhere — even just a piece of sackcloth caught on a thorn — prevented the reconciliation (Yer. Peah, l.c., Lev. R. l.c., and elsewhere). Moreover, it was wrong of Abner to permit Israelitish youths to kill one another for sport (II Sam. ii. 14-16). No reproach, however, attaches to him for the death of Asahel, since Abner killed him in self-defense (Sanh. 49a).
      ellauri156.html on line 541: It is characteristic of the rabbinical view of the Bible narratives that Abner, the warrior pure and simple, is styled "Lion King of the Law" (Yer. Peah, l.c.), and that even a specimen is given of a halakic discussion between him and Dog as to whether the law in Deut. xxiii. 3 excluded Ammonite and Moabite women from the Jewish community as well as men. Dog was of the opinion that David, being descended from the Moabitess Ruth, was not fit to wear the crown, nor even to be considered a true Israelite; while Abner maintained that the law affected only the male line of descent. When Dog's dialectics proved more than a match for those of Abner, the latter went to the prophet Samuel, who not only supported Abner in his view, but utterly refuted Dog's assertions (Midr. Sam. xxii.; Yeb. 76b et seq.).
      ellauri156.html on line 544:
      A theoretical map of the region around 830 BCE. Moab (aka West Bank) is shown in purple on this map, between the Arnon and Zered rivers.

      ellauri156.html on line 550: Earlier in this series: David condemned Joab and put him under a curse because he shed the innocent blood of Abner. Now, this same David (well, not really the same David) now uses Joab to kill Uriah and get him out of his way. David's enemy (Joab) has become his friend, or at least his ally. David's enemies (the Ammonites) have become his allies (they fire the fatal shots which kill Uriah). And David's faithful servant Uriah has been put to death as though he were the enemy. Not only is Uriah put to death, but a number of other Israelite warriors die with him. They have to be sacrificed to conceal the murder of Uriah. Uriah's death has to be viewed as one of a group of men, rather than merely one man. Without a doubt, this is the moral and spiritual low-water mark of David's life.
      ellauri156.html on line 552: These eight verses, devoted to the way in which Uriah's death is reported, are double the length of the account of David's sin with Bathsheba. They virtually equal the length of the account of David's dealings with Uriah. These verses begin with Joab's careful instructions to the messenger, who is to bring the news of Uriah's death to David. They conclude with the messenger's actual report and David's response to it. Why does the author devote so much time and space to the way in which Uriah's death is reported to David? Let us see if we can find the answer to this question as we look more closely at these verses.
      ellauri156.html on line 554: Mission accomplished: Uriah is dead. Joab has carried out David's instructions to the letter. Now Joab must send word to David, in a way that does not completely disclose this conspiracy. Joab calls for a messenger to go to David. He gives very exacting instructions to him. He is first to give a full and complete report of the events of the war, including the ill-fated attack on the city, and the slaughter of Uriah and those with him. Why is how the messenger reports this incident so important?
      ellauri156.html on line 556: The answer is quite simple, as is evident by Joab's own concerns. The entire mission is a fiasco. The Israelites have besieged the city of Rabbah. This means they surround the city, giving the people no way in or out of the city. All the Israelites have to do is wait them out and starve them out. There is no need for any attack. The mission is a suicide mission from the outset, and it does not take a genius to see it for what it is. Joab has to assemble a group of mighty men, like Uriah, and including Uriah, to wage an attack on the city. This attack is not at the enemy's weakest point, as we would expect, but at the strongest point. This attack provokes a counter-attack by the Ammonites against Uriah and those with him. When the Israelite army draws back from their own men, they leave them defenseless, and the obvious result is a slaughter. How can one possibly report this fiasco in a way that doesn’t make Joab look like a fool (at best), or a murderer (at worst)?
      ellauri156.html on line 558: This the reason for Joab's careful instructions to the messenger. He is to report the attack on the city of Rabbah to David, and then tell of the Israelite losses which result. Joab knows that David will react (perhaps hypocritically) to the report of the attack and the resulting losses. It is at this point, Joab instructs the messenger, that he is to inform David of the death of Uriah. This will certainly end any protest or criticism on David's part.
      ellauri156.html on line 560: And so in verses 22-25 we are given an account of the messenger's arrival, of his report to David, and of David's response. I must point out that the messenger does not do as he is told, at least the way I read the account. The messenger goes to David and tells the king how the Ammonites prevailed against them as they left the city and pursued the Israelites into the open field. The Israelites then pursued the Ammonites, pushing them back toward the city as far as the city gate. It was here that Uriah and those with him were fighting. It was here that they were within range of the archers, who shot at them and killed a number of servants. And quickly the servant adds, “and your servant Uriah the Hittite is also dead” (verse 14).
      ellauri156.html on line 562: Now why does this messenger not wait for David to respond in anger, as Joab instructed? Why does he inform David that Uriah has been killed, before he even utters a word of criticism or protest? I believe the messenger gives the report in this way because he understands what is really going on here. I think he may know about David and Bathsheba, and perhaps even of her pregnancy. He certainly knows that Uriah was summoned to Jerusalem. I think he also figures out that David wants to get rid of Uriah, and that Joab has accomplished this by this miserable excuse for an offensive against the enemy. I think the messenger figures out that if David knows Uriah has been killed, he will not raise any objections to this needless slaughter. And so, rather than wait for David to hypocritically rant and rave about the stupidity of such a move, he just goes on and tells him first, so that he will not receive any reaction from David.
      ellauri156.html on line 566: Then David said to the messenger, “Thus you shall say to Joab, 'Do not let this thing displease you, for the sword devours one as well as another; make your battle against the city stronger and overthrow it'; and so encourage him” (2 Samuel 11:25).
      ellauri156.html on line 568: These words of David are the frosting on the cake. They seem gracious and understanding, even sympathetic. In effect, David is saying, “Well, don't worry about it. After all, you win a few, and you lose a few. That's the way the cookie crumbles.” Uriah, a great warrior and a man of godly character (but not a Jew, mind you), has just died, and David does not express one word of grief, one expression of sorrow, not one word of tribute. Uriah dies, and David is unmoved. Contrast his response to the death of Uriah with his responses to the deaths of Saul and Jonathan (2 Samuel 1:11-27), and even of Abner (2 Samuel 3:28-39). This is not the David of a few chapters earlier. This is a hardened, callused David, callused by his own sin.
      ellauri156.html on line 570: Our text has many applications and implications for today. Let me suggest a few as I conclude this lesson. First, “Can a Christian fall?” Yes. Some folks in the Bible may cause us to question whether they really ever came to please Dog, folks like Balaam or Samson or Saul. But we have no such questions regarding David. He is not only a believer, he is a model believer. In the Bible, David sets the standard because he is a man after God's heart. Nevertheless, this man David, in spite of his popularity in Dog's circles, in spite of his marvelous times of worship and his bea-u-utiful psalms, falls deeply into sin. If David can fall, so can we, which is precisely what Paul, another crook and tricky Dick, warns us about:
      ellauri156.html on line 574: Second, “How far can a Christian fall?” This far [Bob points down there with his fingers]. David not only commits the sin of adultery, he commits murder. I think it is safe to say that there is no sin of which the Christian is not capable in the flesh. I have heard people say, “I don't know how a person who _______ could have ever been a Christian.” There are times -- like this time for David -- when it is obvious that we will hardly be saved by the testimony of our actions. Christians come from just the same gene pool of motherfuckers as the rest of us.
      ellauri156.html on line 576: Third, “How fast can a Christian fall?” This fast [Bob flaps his hands]. It is amazing how quickly David falls into the sins depicted in this one chapter. In a matter of weeks, or months at best. Apart from God's sustaining grace, we can fall very far, very quickly. Let us be reminded of this fact from David's tragic experience.
      ellauri156.html on line 578: Fourth, "How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?" Sin snowballs. Sin has not got a snowball's chance in hell. Sin is not stagnant; it is not static. Sin grows. Look at the progression of sin in our text. David's sin starts when he ceases to act like a soldier and (what is way worse) becomes a late sleeper. David's sin grows from staying up late to adultery to murder. His sin begins very privately, but as the story progresses, more and more people become aware of it, and worse yet, more and more people become participants in it. His sin first acted out by his taking another man's wife, and then taking another man's life, and along with his life, his wife, plus the lives of a number of men who must die with him to make his death credible. David's sin blossoms so that it transforms a true and loyal friend (Uriah) to his enemy, and his enemies (the Ammonites, and his other rival Joab) into his allies.
      ellauri156.html on line 580: Fifth, when we seek to conceal our sin, things only get worse. Thus, the best course of action is to confess our sins and to forsake them. But that would have been an embarrassing loss of face to Dog, who had been rooting for David all this time. So better not, after all. Everything went well in the end anyway, and that's what counts.
      ellauri156.html on line 582: He who conceals his transgressions will not prosper, except for David, and a few others, come to think of it. But he who confesses and forsakes them will find compassion (Proverbs 28:13). And that is all he finds. Quite often compassion at his scaffold and grave.
      ellauri156.html on line 584: How much better it would have been for David simply to have confessed his sin with Bathsheba and found forgiveness then? Not a whit, it would only made matters worse. Who was Bathsheba anyway to show forgiveness to the king? Just another skirt.
      ellauri156.html on line 586: Man (and exceptionally, woman) has been seeking to cover up his sins ever since the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve thought they could cover their sins by hiding their nakedness behind the fig leaves (hardly large enough for Adam's snake), and if not this, by hiding themselves from God behind Eve's bush. But God "lovingly" sought them out, not only to rebuke them and to pronounce some select curses upon them, but to give them a lame promise of forgiveness when the flagpoles start to bloom. It was God who provided a covering for their sins, in the form of snappy sackcloth jeans. The sacrificial death, burial, resurrection, and feasting on rumpsteaks cut from our Lord Jesus Christ's butt is God's provision for covering our sins. Have you experienced it, my friend? If not, why not confess your sin now and receive God's gift of forgiveness from him in person (in pirsuna pirsunalmente), and work henceforward with Jesus Christ in the cross factory of Cavalry? How 'bout that? A. Yokum, frost-bite travelers re-skewered reasonable. Ask for rates!
      ellauri156.html on line 588: Sixth, our text makes Uriah a hero and a dress model, not a chump and not a sucker. There are those who might conclude that Uriah's elevator may not “go to the top floor” (as my neighbor used to say of those she considered less than bright). Is Uriah gullible? Is he ignorant of what David is trying to do? Is he a coon? A spook? I don't think so. This is what makes his loyalty to David and to God's Law so striking. I think it is safe to say that here Uriah is very much like David in his earlier days, in terms of his response to Saul. As Saul sought to kill David unjustly, because he was jealous of his successes, so also David submitted himself to faithfully serving Saul, his master. He left his safety and future in God's hands, and God did not fail him. Who? Not Uriah, apparently.
      ellauri156.html on line 590: Seventh, Uriah is a reminder to us that God does not always deliver the righteous from the hand of the wicked immediately, or even in this lifetime. This is a really crucial point! Don't except to be saved except ex post facto. Daniel's three friends told the king that their God was able to deliver them. They did not presume that He would, or that He must, only that theoretically, he could if he wanted to. And God did deliver them, though with late delivery, rather like today's postal services. I think Christians should look upon this sort of deliverance as the rule, rather than the exception. But when Uriah faithfully serves his king (David), he loses his life. God is not obliged to “bail us out of trouble” or to keep us from trials and tribulations just because we trust in Him. Sometimes it is the will of God for men to trust fully in Him and to submit to human government (what? like U.S. government? No way Jose!), and still to suffer adversity, from which God may not deliver us. Spirituality is no guarantee that we will no longer suffer in this life. In fact, spiritual intimacy with God is often the cause of our sufferings (see Matthew 5).
      ellauri156.html on line 611: Stupid question, everyman has not got Dog's triceps, so how could he deliver Daniel, even if he wanted to? Well, he might have delivered Daniel to the lions, had he been all present and correct at the occasion. In the Old Testament, as in the New, God sometimes delivers His people from the hands of wicked men, but often He does not, or delivers them TO the wicked men. Their “deliverance” comes much later with the coming of the other Messiah, Lord Jesus Christ. Uriah, like all of the Old Testament saints of old, died without receiving his full reward, and that is because God wanted him to wait. Uriah, like many of the Old Testament saints, was not delivered from the hands of the wicked. This is pointed out by the author of Hebrews:
      ellauri156.html on line 615: Uriah should not be criticized or looked down upon for his loyalty and submission to David. He should be highly commended. In fact, a friend suggested a new thought for my consideration: “Suppose that Uriah was added to the list of war heroes because of his loyalty and courage in this battle which cost him his life? It is a possibility to consider. Uriah is one of those Gentile converts whose faith and obedience puts many Israelites to shame. He is among many of those who have trusted and obeyed God who have not received their just rewards in this life, but who will be rewarded in the coming kingdom of God. Too many Christians today want their blessings “now” and are not willing to suffer, waiting for their reward then. Let them think carefully about the example of Uriah for their own lives. His elevator may have not gone all the way to the top floor, but by Gawd, he will reach it when Jacob lets down the ladder!
      ellauri156.html on line 618: 39 We know that while David was at the cave of Adullam, his brothers and all his father’s household, along with others in distress, came to David there, fearing the wrath of Saul (1 Samuel 22:1-2). Joab, Abishai, and Asahel were all the sons of Zeruiah, the sister of David (1 Chronicles 2:16). I infer from this that these three men joined David at the time his family joined him.
      ellauri156.html on line 619: 40 Note here that there was a three-day feast of David and the men who joined with him. This was certainly a time to get to know these men.
      ellauri156.html on line 620: 41 Is this, by any chance, a clue as to what the “present” was that David sent after Uriah in verse 8? Was the present some “food and drink”? I wonder. 42 Uriah’s actions raise some interesting questions about those who get themselves drunk. It seems to me that our text strongly implies that even drunk, a man cannot be forced to violate his convictions, unless of course he wants to do so. I wonder how many people get drunk because they want to do what they do drunk, and they think they can blame alcohol for their own sin? It seems like another version of, “The Devil made me do it.”
      ellauri156.html on line 627: In addition to the hundreds of sheep in a nearby pasture, there was a small lamb in a pen, very close to the house. It was a frisky, friendly little fellow, and we loved to "play" with it. We were somewhat perplexed as to why this fellow was kept by himself, away from the rest of the flock. The farmer's nephew came by, and I asked him. It took a while to understand his strong accent, but finally I realized he was telling me this was his “pet lamb.” The problem was that he said it as though it were one word, “bedlam.” This was obviously a separate category, distinct from the category of mere “sheep” or a “lamb.” This “pet lamb” was given a special pen, right by the house, and a lot more attention and care than the rest. I did not dare to ask the man where his "penis".
      ellauri156.html on line 629: Now this little fellow was one lamb among a great many. Nevertheless, he enjoyed the distinction of being regarded as a “pet lamb.” (I am coming to te most narcissistic part of my sermon, going to introduce you to the good shepherd in a moment.) In the story which Nathan tells David, it is not quite the same. Nathan tells David of a “pet lamb” who is the only sheep of a poor farmer. This lamb does not live in a pen outside the house; it lives inside the house, often in the loving hairy arms of its master, and eats the same food he eats. This is the story Nathan tells David, which God uses to expose the wretchedness of David's sin. It is our text for this message, and once again, it has much to teach us, as well as David. Let us give careful heed to the inspired words of Nathan, and learn from a lamb. (I bet the lamb had much more to learn from the "boys".)
      ellauri156.html on line 631: But now a speedy recap of my previous zillion-word summary of Dog's twenty-line storyline thus far. (Thanx to Netflix for this genial method of stretching a watered-down story to a multiple of its length. Thanx to BERBER for paying me per word and not per idea.)
      ellauri156.html on line 633: David has become king of both Judah and Israel. He has, in large measure, consolidated his kingdom. He has taken Jebus and made it his capital city, renaming it Jerusalem. He has built his palace and given thought to building a temple (a plan God significantly revises). He has subjected most of Israel's neighboring nations. He has done battle with the Ammonites and prevailed, but he has not yet completely defeated them. The Ammonites have retreated to the royal city of Rabbah, and as the time for war (spring) approaches, David sends all Israel, led by Joab, to besiege the city and to bring about its surrender. David has chosen not to endure the rigors of camping in the open field, outside the city. He has chosen rather to remain in Jerusalem. Sleeping late, David rises from his bed as others prepare to go to bed for the night. David strolls about the rooftop of his palace and happens to steal a look at a beautiful young woman bathing herself, perhaps ceremonially, in fulfillment of the law.
      ellauri156.html on line 635: It is not due to any intent on her part, nor even any indiscretion. She is bathing herself as darkness falls, and being poor (see 12:1-4), she does not have the privilege of complete privacy, especially when the king can look down from the lofty heights of his rooftop vantage point. David is struck with her beauty and sends messengers to inquire about her identity. They inform David of her identity, and that she is married to Uriah, the Hittite. That should have ended his interest, but it does not. David sends messengers who take her, bringing her to his palace, and there he sleeps with her. When she cleanses herself, she goes home. (Or was it the other way round? Can't remember.)
      ellauri156.html on line 637: It all seems to be over. David is not looking for another wife; he is not even looking for an affair. He is looking for a conquest. That should have happened on the battlefield, not in the bedroom! Things take a very different turn when Bathsheba sends word to David that she is pregnant. David first seeks to cover up his sin by ordering Joab to send Uriah home on furlough, ostensibly to give David a report on the war. David's efforts to get Uriah into bed with Bathsheba begin as subtle hints, then change to veiled orders, and then turn crass as David seeks to get Uriah to do drunk what he will not do sober. When these efforts fail (due to Uriah's noble character), David sends Uriah back to Joab, with written orders to Joab to put him to death in a way that makes it seem like a casualty of war. Joab does as he is told and sends word to David: “Mission accomplished.” It is here that our apparently never-ending story resumes.
      ellauri156.html on line 641: Bathsheba's response to the death of her husband is as we would expect, as we would also hope. From what the text tells us, she has absolutely no part in David's plot to deceive her husband, let alone to put him to death. Undoubtedly, she learns of Uriah's death in much the same way every war widow does, then or now. When she is officially informed of Uriah's death in battle, she mourns for her husband. We cannot be certain just how long this period of mourning is. We know, for example, that if a virgin of some distant (i.e., not Canaanite) nation was captured by an Israelite during a raid on her town, the Israelite could take her for a wife after she had mourned for her parents (who would have been killed in the raid) for a full month (Deuteronomy 21:10-13). As I will seek to show in a moment, I believe Bathsheba's mourning is genuine, and not hypocritical. I believe she mourns her husband's death because she loves him.
      ellauri156.html on line 643: David, on the other hand, does not even bother to go through the pretense of mourning. He does not even try to be hypocritical. When other mighty men of Israel died, David led the nation in mourning their loss. David mourned for Saul and his sons, killed in the battle with the Philistines (2 Samuel 1). David mourned the death of Abner, wickedly put to death by Joab (2 Samuel 3:28ff.). He even sent a delegation to officially mourn the death of Nahash, king of the Ammonites (2 Samuel 10). But when Uriah is killed “in battle,” not a word of mourning comes from David's lips. He is not sorry; he is relieved. Instead of instructing others to mourn for Uriah, he sends word to Joab not to take his death too seriously.
      ellauri156.html on line 645: When Bathsheba's mourning is complete, David sends for her and brings her to himself as his wife. Wait, was little David born as yet, or did he start fucking her with her belly full? I do not see him bending down on his knees, proposing. I do not see him courting her, sending her roses. I see him “taking” her once again. And again. In fact, this is my favourite part. The question in my mind is, “Why?” Why does David take Bathsheba into his house as one of his wives? I do not think he is any longer trying to “cover up” his sin; it is far too late for that. She must be “showing” her pregnancy by now, and it is hard to imagine how all Israel cannot know what has been going on. It appears that at this point, David is not trying to conceal his sin, but to legitimize it. Whatever David's reasons may be, they are hardly spiritual, and they are most certainly self-serving.
      ellauri156.html on line 647: Nathan has a response to the death of Uriah too, which is taken up in the first part of chapter 12. But let us save that until after drawing your attention to something which has been going on in David's life that we have not seen from our text, and which the author of Samuel has not recorded. But David himself discloses this to us in one of his psalms, written in reflection of this incident in our text.
      ellauri156.html on line 658: Psalm 32 is one of two psalms (the other is Psalm 51) in which David himself reflects on his sin, his repentance, and his recovery. Verses 3 and 4 of Psalm 32 are the focus of my attention at this point in time. These verses fit between chapters 11 and 12 of 2 Samuel. The confrontation of David by Nathan Zuckermann the prophet, described in 2 Samuel 12, results in David's repentance and confession. But this repentance is not just the fruit of Nathan's rebuke; it is also David's response to the work God has been doing in David's heart before he confesses, while he is still attempting to conceal his sin.
      ellauri156.html on line 660: In these verses, David makes it clear that God is at work even when it does not appear to be so. During the time David tries to cover up his sin, God is at work exposing it in his heart. These are not times of pleasure and joy, as Satan would like us to conclude; they are days of misery. David is plagued with guilt. He cannot sleep, and it seems he cannot eat. Worst of all, he cannot fuck. He is not sleeping nights, and he is losing weight. Whether or not David recognizes it as God who is at work in him, he does know he is miserable. It is this misery which tenderizes David, preparing him for the rebuke Nathan Zuckermann is to bring, preparing him for repentance. David's repentance is not the result of David's assessment of his situation; it is the result of divine intervention. Hey wait? If that is the case, where is the much-advertised free will? He has gone so far in sin that he cannot think straight. God is at work in David's life to break him, so that he will once again cast himself upon God for grace. He has good experience in casting himself upon folk, from Saul thru Jonathan to Bathsheba.
      ellauri156.html on line 675: There are several important things to note about this meeting between Nathan and King David. First, note that Nathan is sent to David. Nathan is, of course, a prophet. However it comes about, he knows what David has done. If you will pardon the pun, David cannot pull the wool over his eyes. His words are, in the final analysis, the very word of God (see 12:11). If Nathan is a prophet, he is also a man who seems to be a friend to David. One of David's sons is named Nathan (2 Samuel 5:14). David informs Nathan of his desire to build a temple (chapter 7). Nathan will later christen (sorry, name) Bathsheba's and David's second son (12:25). He will remain loyal to the king and to Solomon when Adonijah seeks to usurp the throne (1 Kings 2). Nathan does not come to David only as God's spokesman, he comes to David as his friend.
      ellauri156.html on line 676:

      hisway">

      ellauri156.html on line 679: Second, note that Nathan is sent to David. Twelve times in the last chapter the word “sent” is employed by the author. A number of these instances refer to David “sending” someone or “sending” for someone. David is a man of power and authority, and so he can “send out” for whatever he wants, including the death of Uriah. Now, it is God who does the “sending.” Herra se on herrallakin. Is David impressed with his power and authority? Has he gotten used to “sending” people to do his work for him (like sending Joab and all Israel to fight the Ammonites)? Let David take note that God is sending Nathan. He is a godsend to Dave.
      ellauri156.html on line 681: Third, Nathan comes to David with a story. In the New American Standard Bible, this is not just a story, but a kind of poetic story. In my copy of the NASB, the words of the story are formatted in such a way as to look like one of the Psalms.43 It took me a while to take note of this, but if this is so, it means that Nathan comes to David prepared. Under divine inspiration, I am sure God could inspire a prophet to utter poetry without working at it in advance, but this does not seem to be the norm. Nathan comes to David well prepared. He is not just “spinning a yarn;” Nathan is telling a story, a very important story with a very important message for David. A message for you sir. Nih Nih.
      ellauri156.html on line 683: Fourth, Nathan's story is a “sheep story,” one that a shepherd can easily grasp and with which he can readily identify. David was a shepherd boy in his younger days, as we know from the Book(s) of Samuel (see 1 Samuel 16:11; 17:15, 28). I wonder if in those lonely days and nights David does not make a “petlamb” of one or more of his sheep? You bet. Some comfort for his lonely nights. Did this sheep eat of his food and drink from his cup? Did this sheep give him a blowjob? Possibly so.
      ellauri156.html on line 685: Fifth, the story Nathan tells David does not “walk on all fours” -- that is, there is no “one to one correspondence” with the story of David's sin with Bathsheba and Uriah. The sheep (which we would liken to Bathsheba) is put to death, not the owner (whom we would liken to Uriah). I think it is important to take note of this fact, lest we press the story beyond its intent.
      ellauri156.html on line 687: Why a story? Why not just let David have it head-on, with both barrels, like David did with Bathsheba? Many will point out that this is a skillfully employed tactic, which gets David to pronounce judgment on the crime before he realizes that he is the criminal. I think this is true. David is angry at this “rich man's” lack of compassion. If he could, he would have this fellow put to death (!). But as it is, justice requires a four-fold restitution. But having already committed himself in principle, Nathan can now apply the principle to David, in particular.
      ellauri156.html on line 689: As I understand the Bible, there is more to the story than this, however. Our lord (meaning Jeshua) frequently told stories. Why was this? Was it because he was trying to “put the cookies on the lowest shelf”? Was he accommodating his teaching to those who might have difficulty understanding it? Sometimes our lord told stories to the religious experts, who should have been able to follow a more technical argument. No, I think his own elevator did not quite reach the upper floors. I am thinking in particular of the story of the Good Samaritan, as recorded in Luke 10. A religious lawyer stood up and asked Jesus a question, not to sincerely learn, but with the hope of making our Lord look bad before the people. He asked, “What shall I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus turned the question around. This man was the expert in the Law of Moses, what did it teach? The man answered, “YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR STRENGTH, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND; AND YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF, THAT IS, EVEN MORE.” (Luke 10:27). In effect, Jesus responded, “Right. Now do it.” That was the problem with the law, no one could do it without failing, and so no one could earn their way to heaven by good works. Well, how high can we get with mediocre works? Someplace between heaven and hell would actually be most preferable.
      ellauri156.html on line 691: The lawyer knew he was in trouble and tried to dig himself out (bad choice). He (like many lawyers then and now) thought he could get himself off the hook by arguing in terms of technicalities. And so he had a follow-up question for Jesus: “And who is my neighbor?” Jesus did not debate this man on his own terms. He was not willing to get into a word study in the original text. Instead, Jesus told a simple story, the story of the Good Samaritan.
      ellauri156.html on line 699: The lawyer was in trouble; the story had no technicalities over which to argue. It brought the issue home, with little ground for quibbling over details. When push came to shove, the lawyer knew our Lord's functional definition of “neighbor” was absolutely right. He had nowhere to hide. The story did the trick; it cut to the heart of the matter, while avoiding trivial details to quibble over for hours. It was not the lawyer who made Jesus look bad with all his minutiae but Jesus who made the lawyer look bad with a simple story. The best part about similes that they can be tweaked any way you wish. Russians are our neighbors if they get to trouble, and so are Chinamen. But there is nothing here about helping them when they threaten our vital interests.
      ellauri156.html on line 701: That is part of the reason Nathan told David this story. It was never meant to be a makeover of David's sin; it is meant to expose David's sin in principle, in a way that cannot be denied. Having done this very well, Nathan then presses on to deal with David's sin specifically.
      ellauri156.html on line 703: The story Nathan tells David is very simple. Two men lived in the same city; one was very rich and the other was very poor. The rich man had flocks and herds.44 The rich man did not just have a large flock and a large herd; he had many flocks and many herds. We would say this man was “filthy rich.” The poor man had but one ewe lamb; this was his “pet lamb.” He purchased it and then raised it in his own home. The lamb spent much time in the man's lap and being carried about. It lived inside the house, not outside, being hand fed with food from the table and even drinking from its master's cup.
      ellauri156.html on line 705: Some of you cannot even imagine what this is like. It is a horrifying thought to you. How could anyone treat an animal that way? I have only one response: Obviously you haven't been to our house lately to be greeted by two cats (who, to the dismay of my wife, can be found around -- and sometimes on -- the table) and four dogs (none of them are ours, technically). I say nothing about my petlamb, even Jennifer doesn't quite approve.
      ellauri156.html on line 707: The rich man had a guest drop in for a visit, and as the host he was obliged to provide him with a meal. After giving the matter considerable thought, the rich man decided upon lamb, and yet he was not willing to sacrifice one lamb from all those he owned. Instead, he took the poor man's lamb, slaughtered and served it to his guest, so as not to suffer any losses personally. He not only let (i.e., forced) the poor man to pick up the tab for the meal, he deprived this man of his only lamb, and one that was like a member of the family.
      ellauri156.html on line 709: I hope I am not guilty of attempting to make this story “walk on all fours” when I stress the same thing the story does -- that there is a very warm and loving relationship between the rich man and the poor man's “pet lamb.” It really tasted great! Considered along with everything else we read about Uriah and Bathsheba and David, I must conclude that the author is making it very clear that Uriah and Bathsheba dearly loved each other. Anyway, who cares this way or that, it was his lamb. When David “took” this woman to his bedroom that fateful night, and then as his wife after the murder of Uriah, he took her from the man she loved. Bathsheba and Uriah were devoted to each other, which adds further weight to the arguments for her not being a willing participant in David's sins. It also emphasizes the character of Uriah, who is so near to his wife, who is being urged by the king to go to her, and yet who refuses to do so out of principle.
      ellauri156.html on line 711: David does not see what is coming. The story Nathan tells makes David furious. The David who was once ready to do in Nabal and all the male members of his household (1 Samuel 25) is now angry enough to do in the villain of Nathan's story. Doing in folks was one of his pet lambs. In some ways, David's response is a bit overdone. He reminds me a bit of Judah in Genesis 38, when he learns that Tamar, his daughter-in-law is pregnant out of wedlock. Not realizing that he is the father of the child in her womb, Judah is ready to have Tamar burned to death. How ironic that those who are guilty of a particular sin are intolerant of this sin in the life of others. Well said, Bob! Christians are really hard on people who have no charity.
      ellauri156.html on line 713: David identifies two evils that have been committed by this fictional rich man. First, the man has stolen a lamb, for which the law prescribed a fourfold restitution (Exodus 22:1).
      ellauri156.html on line 722: Second, David recognizes what he views as the greater sin, and that is the rich man's total lack of compassion. David is furious because a rich man stole and slaughtered a poor man's pet. He does not yet see the connection to his lack of compassion for stealing a poor man's beloved companion, Uriah's wife, Bathsheba. The slaughtering of Uriah is most certainly an act which lacks compassion. The crowning touch in David's display of righteous indignation is the religious flavoring he gives it by the words, “as the Lord lives” (verse 5).
      ellauri156.html on line 728: David has just sprung the trap on himself, and Nathan is about to let him know about it. The first thing Nathan does is to dramatically indict David as the culprit: “You are the man!” In stunned silence, David now listens to the charges against him. David thinks only in terms of the evils the rich man committed against his neighbor, stealing a man's sheep and depriving him of his companion. Put another way, David thinks only in terms of crime and socially unacceptable behavior, not in terms of sin. In verses 7-12, Nathan draws David's attention to his sin against God and the consequences God has pronounced for his sin. Note the repetition of the pronoun “I” in verses 7 and 8: “It was I who. . .
      ellauri156.html on line 734: God speaks to David as though he has forgotten these things, or rather as though he has come to take credit for them himself. Everything David possesses has been given to him by God. Has it been so long since David was a lowly shepherd boy that he has forgotten? David is a “rich” man because God has made him rich. And if he does not think he is rich enough, God will give more to him. David has begun to cling to his “riches,” rather than to cling to the God who made him rich.
      ellauri156.html on line 738: I fear some of us tend to miss the point here. We read Nathan's story and we hear Nathan's rebuke as though David's sin is all about sex. David does commit a sexual sin when he takes Bathsheba and sleeps with her, knowing she is a married woman. But this sexual sin is symptomatic, according to Nathan, and thus according to God. God is not just saying, “Shame on you, David. Look at all the wives and concubines you had to sleep with. And if none of these women pleased you, I could have given you another woman, just one that was not already married.” Wow, this is the same 'gotcha' as with Adam earlier: I give you about anything as long as you keep your fingers off my property.
      ellauri156.html on line 740: Nathan tells David the story of a rich man and a poor man. God tells David through Nathan that all that he possesses (his riches) it is he, the boss, who has given them to him. God is like the rich man, and David the poor one with just the one. David's problem is that his possessions have come to own him. He is so stingy he won't even give his petlamb to Mr. Rich. He is so “possessed” with his lamb that he is unwilling to spend it when his boss has a party. He wants “more” and “more,” and so he begins to take what isn’t his to take, rather than to ask the divine Giver for all he has and more.
      ellauri156.html on line 744: First and foremost, David's sin is against God. He has ceased to humbly acknowledge God as the Giver of all he possesses. He has ceased to look to God to provide him with all his needs -- and his desires. David has not only ceased to ask God to supply his needs, he has disobeyed God's commands by committing adultery and murder. David's sin against God manifests itself by the evils he commits against others. Nathan outlines these, employing a repetitive “you:”
      ellauri156.html on line 751: have taken his wife to be your wife.
      ellauri156.html on line 755: Nathan now proclaims the irreversible consequences to come upon David and his family due to his sin: Therefore the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Us and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife. With an equally repetitive "I will":
      ellauri156.html on line 766: The evil David commits against others is clear disobedience to the revealed Word of God. David is a “man after God's own heart,” and yet in this instance, David “despised the Word of the Lord.” While David does repent and the guilt of his sin is forgiven, these consequences will not be reversed. These consequences are just; they fit the crime David committed. He used the sword of the Ammonites to kill Uriah, and so the sword will not depart from his house. He took the wife of another man, and so his own wives will be taken by another, another from his own house.
      ellauri156.html on line 768: The consequences are not only appropriate, but intensified. David took one man's wife; another will take several (I bet four) of his wives. This happens when Absalom rebels against his father's rule and temporarily takes over the throne. Following the advice of Ahithophel, Absolom pitches a tent on the roof of David's palace (the place from which David first looked upon Bathsheba) and there, in the sight of all Israel, sleeps with David's concubines as a declaration that he has taken over his father's throne and all that goes with it (2 Samuel 16:20-22). While David seeks to commit his sins in private, God sees to it that the consequences are very public. Aijaa. Kai tää Absalom-tarinakin täytyy vielä lehteillä.
      ellauri156.html on line 770: The story goes on as you well know, but we shall stop here, having focused on Nathan's divinely directed rebuke of David. In our next lesson we will give thought to David's repentance and to the immediate consequences of his sin. But let us close this message by considering some very important take-home lessons for us to learn from David's sin and Nathan's rebuke.
      ellauri156.html on line 772: (1) Nathan is a propellerhead, but he is also an example of a faithful friend. Proverbs puts it hisway">this way.
      ellauri156.html on line 778: 20 So Moses said to them, “If you will do this, if you will arm yourselves before the LORD for the war, 21 and all of you armed men cross over the Jordan before the LORD until He has driven His enemies out from before Him, 22 and the land is subdued before the LORD, then afterward you shall return and be free of obligation toward the LORD and toward Israel, and this land shall be yours for a possession before the LORD. 23 “But if you will not do so, behold, you have sinned against the LORD, and be sure your sin will find you out (Numbers 32:20-23, emphasis mine). Note what this says! We must support Israel against its mooslem neighbors! They are not their neighbors! Or rather of course they are but they are also enemies!
      ellauri156.html on line 780: (3) God is under no obligation to stop us from sinning. (So why did he bother with David then? Is he some sort of special case? Of course he is, he is Dawgs petlamb. Sometimes people justify their sin by saying something like: “I've prayed about it and asked God to stop me if it is wrong. . . .” When God does not stop them, they somehow assume it must be right. God could have stopped David after he chose to stay home from the war, or after he began to covet Uriah's wife, or after he committed adultery, but instead He allowed David to persist in his sin for some time. God even allowed David to get away with murder, for a time. Well actually, for good. It was just a immigrant after all. God's Word forbade David's sins of coveting, adultery, and murder. God's Word commanded David to stop, and he did not. God allowed David to persist in his sin for a season, but not indefinitely. God allowed David's sin to go full circle, to reach full bloom, so that he (and we) could see how sin grows (compare Genesis 15:12-16).
      ellauri156.html on line 784: If we look very very carefully at the Bible, we can see that it is a thick book with unusually small print and thin leaves. We will see why stories like that of our text were written. They were written for the small print. They were not written to encourage us to sin, but to warn us of the danger of sin, and thus to encourage us to avoid sin at all costs. After outlining the major sins of the nation Israel in the wilderness in 1 Corinthians 10:1-10, Paul then applies the lesson of history to the Corinthians, and thus to us:
      ellauri156.html on line 796: Let me press this matter even further. David did not plan to sin, as many who try to use his sin as an excuse do. David “fell” into sin; those who would use his sin for an excuse “plunge headlong” into sin. There is a very important difference. In addition, David's sin was the exception, not the rule:
      ellauri156.html on line 798: Because David did what was right in the sight of the LORD, and had not turned aside from anything that He commanded him all the days of his life, except in the case of Uriah the Hittite, and, well, in a minor way, stalking Bathsheba while she was washing herself and then fucking her without leave (1 Kings 15:5, emphasis mine).nn
      ellauri156.html on line 800: (5) David's sin, like all sin, is never worth the price. I have actually had people ask me what the penalty for a certain sin would be, planning to do it and then be forgiven. There are those who toy with sin, thinking that if they sin, they may suffer some consequences, but that God is obliged to forgive them, and thus their eternal future is certain and secure, no matter what they do, even if intentionally. I know of one situation in which a church leader left his wife and ran off with the wife of another, planning to later repent, and then expecting to be welcomed back into the fellowship of that church. This is presumptuous sin, sin of the most serious and dangerous kind. Rather than open a “can of worms” at this point in this message, let me simply say this: “No one ever chooses to sin, and then comes out of it with a smile on their face.” My friend Dawg will almost certainly wipe that smug smirk off their face. I still seethe when I think of that colleague of mine, and how he got away with dumping her hag and plucking a dainty dish from Brother ... (better not say). Took just a few months for the brotherhood to relent. Fuck, it shouldn't be that easy! A little more speedy delivery of the retribution would be indicated, don't you think, milord? Not that I criticize you in any way, milord.
      ellauri156.html on line 802: I used to teach school. From time to time the principal would call a misbehaving student to his office. I will never forget when one of my students was called to his office, and then returned with a smirk on his face. One of my students protested publicly, “Will you look at that? He went to the principal's office and came back with a smile on his face!” My young student was absolutely right. Being called to the principal's office for correction should produce repentance and respect, not a smile. In those few times when I found it necessary to use the “rod” of correction, I purposed that no student would come back into the room with a smile, and none did (including the principal's own son, I might add, who was not even in my class). Oh how my students loved and respected me! I still think it was unfair to sack me. There was hardly any mark left on their precious skin from my rod. Least of all of the one that I used on my coeds.
      ellauri156.html on line 804: I have never met a Christian who chose to sin, and after it was all over felt that it was worth the price. Those that did quite simply were not Christians. David's sin and its consequences should not encourage us to sin, but should motivate us to avoid sin at all costs. The negative consequences of sin far outweigh the momentary pleasures of sin. Sin is never worth the price, even for those whose sin is forgiven. Sin is not worth it even when it's free of charge. In fact, we ought to be paid to commit sin. (Some do, like the adulterous woman in Proverbs, and Trick Dick's burglars. But we won't open that can of worms now that we are this close to the finish line.)
      ellauri156.html on line 806: (6) It was the story of the slaughter of a lamb which exposed the immensity of David's sin. It is the story of the slaughter of The Lamb of God which exposes the immensity of our sins. (I am not suggesting that this comparison is on all fours, though the thought is close. Like the rich man slaughtering the poor people's only lamb to have a feast.) Isn't it amazing that David was so blinded by his own sin that he could not see it? It was by means of the story of the slaughter of a poor man's pet lamb that David was gripped with the immensity of the sin which was his own. David could see his own sin when he heard the story of what appeared to be the sin of another.
      ellauri156.html on line 810: Note that this last part is full of Saulus quotes. Whenever evangelists are about to finish they pepper their talk with these Saulus quotes. I guess it is because Saulus' job was so close to their own: first scare the suckers and then sugar the medicine.
      ellauri156.html on line 812: That is precisely what the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ does for us. We were dead in our trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1-3). We were blinded to the immensity of our sins (2 Corinthians 4:4). The coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, His perfect life, His innocent and sacrificial death, His literal and physical resurrection are all historical events. But the gospel is also a story, a true story. When we read the New Testament Gospels, we read a story that is even more dramatic, more amazing, more disturbing than the story Nathan told David. When we see the way unbelieving men treated our Lord, we should be shocked, horrified, and angered. We should cry out, “They deserve to die!” And that they do. But the Gospel is not written only to show us their sins -- those who actually heard Jesus and cried, “Crucify Him, Crucify Him” -- it is written so that the Spirit of God can cry out in our hearts, “Thou art the man! Yo mon!” When we see the way men treated Jesus, we see the way we would treat him, if he were here. We see how we treat him today. With laughter and ridicule. And that, my friend, reveals the immensity of our sin, and the immensity of our need for repentance and forgiveness. Words, words, words. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
      ellauri156.html on line 814: The Gospel of Jesus Christ is “Good News.” (No, it is Dog's breakfast. You must be thinking of euangelion.) The “Good News” is the death of our Lord, which reveals the immensity of our sin, is the immense workload of God by which he can and will forgive us of our sin. (Recall here Dosto's and many other mystics' meme that everybody should feel guilty of everything. They really enjoy it! It is some variant of algolagnia.) By His innocent and sacrificial death, Jesus died in our place, paid the penalty for our sins. Come to think of it, the logic of this story IS on all fours with God's judgment on David's oversight: Not nice but don't worry, I'll cash your debt on some innocent scapegoat.
      ellauri156.html on line 816: He bore ours sins on the cross! And by trusting in His death, burial, and resurrection, we die to sin (or sin to die, pick your choice, like David from Nathan's deck of bottom cards) and are raised to novelty products of eternal life, in Christ. The Gospel must first bring us to a recognition of the magnitude of our sin, and of our guilt, and then it takes us to the magnitude of God's grace in Jesus Christ, by which our sins can be forgiven. Have you come to see how great your sins are before a holy God? Then I urge you to experience how great a salvation is yours, brought about by this same God, through the death, burial, and resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ. What a Relief! Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a relief it is.
      ellauri158.html on line 40: Jeg er pinnsvin, sanoi norjalaisessa mamusarjassa Jordbrukerne wannabe islamilaisgladiaattori, joka oli ihan poikki. Spinoza oli toinen samanlainen. Siilit ovat kivoja, vahvisti Iso Pauli vielä seniilinä. Ei sixi että ne syövät käärmeitä, vaan sixi että ne lyllertävät ja tuhisevat söpösti. Siilejä oli ennen paljon Sysmässä ja Käpylässä. Nyt ei niitä näy. Hyönteiset lie niiltä loppuneet, ja käärmeet.
      ellauri158.html on line 44: Spinoza’s views on necessity and possibility, which he claimed were the “principal foundation” of his Ethics (Ep75), have been less than well received by his readers, to put it mildly. From Spinoza’s contemporaries to our own, readers of the Ethics have denounced Spinoza’s views on modality as metaphysically confused at best, ethically nihilistic at worst. Kristityt on aina vihanneet Spinozaa, mutta niin on juutalaisetkin. Siili ressu.
      ellauri158.html on line 46: The actual world, we might now say, is the only possible world. Events could not, in the strongest sense of that expression, have gone any differently than they in fact have gone. This is the position of necessitarianism, a belief that few in the history of Western philosophy have explicitly embraced. And for good reason — on the face of it, necessaritianism is highly counterintuitive. Surely the world could have gone slightly differently than it has gone. Couldn’t the Allies have lost WWII? No way! They were in the right! Couldn’t Leibniz have been a sister or not been born at all? Täähän on kuin Jaakko Hintikka versus Jon Barwise.
      ellauri158.html on line 51: According to More, Spinoza is a materialist (“matter is God”). Against this position, More attempts to show that a spiritual God is required to explain certain pertinent facts about our world, including the existence of motion. Tää More on niin hölmö ettei sitä jaxa edes lukea. Tää More oli Henry More, eikä se Erasmuxen jesuiitta homoystävä Thomas. Henry on varsinaisen luupään näköinen. Se kexi kysymyxen "montako enkeliä mahtuu tanssimaan nuppineulan päällä". Oireellisesti sitä siteeraavat Ralph "Waldo" Emerson ja kreivitär Blavatsky. Sen mielestä enkeleillä piti olla perse, nimittäin 4. ulottuvuudessa. (Sixi niitä mahtuu niin monta nuppineulan päälle.)
      ellauri158.html on line 53: What Clarke argues is that the Newtonian natural system and the findings that stem from it are incompatible with the “blind necessity” that characterizes both the Epicurean and Spinozistic world picture, precisely because this system implies the existence of an immaterial and wise Creator. What the fuck? It is a deterministic system par excellence. Ach, tarkoitatte alkuehtoja. Vanha antroposentrinen jumalatodistus: jos jumala ei olis säätänyt kaikkea näin hyvin, ei olis meitäkään. Tää ei voi olla sattumaa! Maailmamme ei voi olla 1 ziljoonasta sokeasta yrityxestä! Vai voiko se? This lottery is unfair, huutaa Shirley Jackson kiukkuisena, kun kivet lentävät. Shirley putkahti esille albumissa 133 ja putkahtaa uudelleen esille albumissa 270.
      ellauri158.html on line 204: -- P. 1. prop. 13. coroll. Ex his sequitur, nullam substantiam, et consequenter nullam substantiam corpoream, quatenus substantia est, esse divisibilem. [in: P. 1. prop. 15. schol.]
      ellauri158.html on line 321: Pena vetää tässä luvussa aika hienon reductio ad absurdumin teologiasta laplacelaiseen determinismiin yhistettynä. Hupaisinta on eze on suurin piirtein oikeassa koko ajan, paizi tietysti tossa res cogitans dualismissa. Joo, absurdiahan tää kaikki on, jos tätä koittaa ymmärtää jonkinlaisena muumipelinä. Ihan paras on kun ei liikaa mieti sitä.
      ellauri158.html on line 417: Vielä täytyy ottaa huohmioon se mahis että Spinoza kuin muinaiset kreikkalaiset, ajatteli että kausaatiokin on jotain loogista. Niinhän voi ehkä ajatella, jos vaan 1 maailma on mahdollinen. Kaikki mikä ei tapahdu on vaan mahootointa, kaikki mahdollinen on välttämätöntä. Boxi ja timantti redusoituu pois. Kaikki totuudet on käsitteellisiä, koska ei ole mitään kontingenttia. Jos Spinoza tosiaan ajatteli noin, mä olen pettynyt.
      ellauri158.html on line 436: Aina tietää että kun Siili alkaa monisanaisesti pulista, se ei välttämättä izekään ihan tiedä mitä se haluu sanoa. Mitähän tääkin taaas olisi? Onxe jotain sellasta että toteutumattomat asiat (esim siis apinoiden esi-isät) on olemassa joteskin kuitenkin jumalan hämärinä ajatuxina sittenkin kun niitä ei oikeasti ole? Vaikea sanoa, kun Siili ei edes ize kexi yhtään kunnon esimerkkiä. Jotain geometrista höpinää ympyrään piirretyistä neliöistä vaan. Tässä tulee mieleen sen peräsuolisyöpään kuolleen Jon Barwisen vaikeudet kun se koitti rakentaa semantiikan vaan yhdestä mahdollisesta maailmasta. Se oli aika siilimäistä. Onkohan se oikein realistista? Jaakko Hintikkaa sanottiin idealistixi kun sillä oli niitä monia. Hintikkaa ei hirveästi vaivannut oliko ne oikeasti olemassa, leikisti oikeasti, mitä väliä. Ize asiassa Barwise oli varmaan niistä oikeistolaisempi. In his last year, Barwise was invited to give the 2000 Gödel Lecture; he died prior to the lecture.
      ellauri158.html on line 688: All such opinions spring from the notion commonly entertained, that all things in nature act as men themselves act, namely, with an end in view. It is accepted as certain, that God himself directs all things to a definite goal (for it is said that God made all things for man, and man that he might worship him). I will, therefore, consider this opinion, asking first, why it obtains general credence, and why all men are naturally so prone to adopt it? secondly, I will point out its falsity; and, lastly, I will show how it has given rise to prejudices about good and bad, right and wrong, praise and blame, order and confusion, beauty and ugliness, and the like.
      ellauri158.html on line 694: Hence also it follows, that everyone thought out for himself, according to his abilities, a different way of worshipping God, so that God might love him more than his fellows, and direct the whole course of nature for the satisfaction of his blind cupidity and insatiable avarice. Thus the prejudice developed into superstition, and took deep root in the human mind; and for this reason everyone strove most zealously to understand and explain the final causes of things; but in their endeavor to show that nature does nothing in vain, i.e. nothing which is useless to man, they only seem to have demonstrated that nature, the gods, and men are all mad together. Consider, I pray you, the result: among the many helps of nature they were bound to find some hindrances, such as storms, earthquakes, diseases, &c.: so they declared that such things happen, because the gods are angry at some wrong done to them by men, or at some fault committed in their worship. Experience day by day protested and showed by infinite examples, that good and evil fortunes fall to the lot of pious and impious alike; still they would not abandon their inveterate prejudice, for it was more easy for them to class such contradictions among other unknown things of whose use they were ignorant, and thus to retain their actual and innate condition of ignorance, than to destroy the whole fabric of their reasoning and start afresh. They therefore laid down as an axiom, that God´s judgments far transcend human understanding. Such a doctrine might well have sufficed to conceal the truth from the human race for all eternity, if mathematics had not furnished another standard of verity in considering solely the essence and properties of figures without regard to their final causes. There are other reasons (which I need not mention here) besides mathematics, which might have caused men´s minds to be directed to these general prejudices, and have led them to the knowledge of the truth.
      ellauri158.html on line 699: The Southern Journal of Philosophy (U of Memphis) has provided a forum for a long list of suspect figures including Hans-Georg Gadamer, Hubert Dreyfus, George Santayana, Wilfrid Sellars, and Richard Sorabji.
      ellauri158.html on line 872: P. 3. prop. 56. Laetitiae, tristitiae et cupiditatis, et consequenter uniuscuiusque affectus, qui ex his componitur, ut animi fluctuationis, vel qui ab his derivatur, nempe amoris, odii, spei, metus etc., tot species dantur, quot sunt species obiectorum, a quibus afficimur. [in: P. 4. prop. 33.]
      ellauri158.html on line 1129: -- P. 4. prop. 68. schol. De Mosis historia primi hominis.
      ellauri158.html on line 1153: P. 5. prop. 2. Si animi commotionem seu affectum a causae externae cogitatione amoveamus et aliis iungamus cogitationibus, tum amor seu odium erga causam externam, ut et animi fluctuationes quae ex his affectibus oriuntur, destruentur. [in: P. 5. prop. 4. schol., prop. 20. schol.]
      ellauri159.html on line 380: or his slaves, or his animals, or anything of thy neighbour
      ellauri159.html on line 412:
    6. R: Reformed Christians follow John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion, which follows the Septuagint; this system is also used in the Anglican Book of Common Prayer.

    7. ellauri159.html on line 415:
    8. L: Lutherans follow hism" title="Luther's Large Catechism">Luther's Large Catechism, which follows Augustine but subordinates the prohibition of images to the sovereignty of God in the First Commandment and uses the word order of Exodus 20:17 rather than Deuteronomy 5:21 for the ninth and tenth commandments.

    9. ellauri159.html on line 418:
    10. C: hism_of_the_Catholic_Church" title="Catechism of the Catholic Church">Catechism of the Catholic Church, largely follows Augustine. Combines the Exodus language prohibiting images of God with the command to have no other gods but the Lord, as the first commandment. Changes "the sabbath" into "the lord's day". Divides Exodus 20:17, prohibiting covetousness, into two commandments.

    11. ellauri159.html on line 420: Selvin ero näyttäs olevan että ortodoxeilla on oma pykälä jumalankuville. Jotain ironiaa kun just nimenomaan ortodoxit on into piukeena kuvakkeisiin ja aivan tehtailevat niitä. Lutherin osalta päinvastainen ratkaisu on yllättävä kun muistaa Löden kirkkohissan luntista että nimenomaan Luther tuhri Lohjan kirkon pirunkuvat kalkkimaalilla. Mutta toisaalta Martti kuurnii Akun ja muiden länkkäreiden kanssa omaisuudensuojaa useampaan pykälään, mikä musta tuntui jo kouluaikana tosi kummalta. Mutta jos on tosiaan aivan vitun kiinnostunut mammonasta, kai se sitten on huomattava parannus.
      ellauri159.html on line 522: Ei sitä myös määrittele ,LLL:n eikä häntä ennen Luther: vaikka oli Uskonpuhistaja HÄNKIN. totetutti HERRAN sanaa. nyt tulemme
      ellauri159.html on line 565: There is no single document about the knightly code that lists all the virtues like this. It’s a modern interpretation of several documents that outline some kind of behavioral code for knights. Between 1170 and 1220 there were several documents outlining a code of conduct for knights but there wasn’t a decision made to use a single one. The overarching idea of these virtues was “chivalry”. Chivalry originated in the Holy Roman Empire from the idealization of the cavalryman. Military bravery, individual training, and service to others—especially in Francia, among horse soldiers in Charlemagne’s cavalry.
      ellauri159.html on line 567: I’m aware that “knightly virtues” sounds a lot like a fedora wearing “nice guy”. If you go back in history, I don’t think you can deny that knights were pretty badass and nothing like the modern day “nice guy”. The difference is that a real knight was strong and powerful. A “nice guy” tries being nice because he is powerless. There is a big difference. Suggested post: A gentleman is not a “nice guy
      ellauri159.html on line 569: It’s almost like the knightly virtues are the ideal masculine character. And in my opinion these virtues are a good ideal to strive towards. This is something to keep in mind. This code wasn’t meant for everyone. It’s for soldiers on horses, you know, knights… This combination of virtues is supposed to be the best possible behavior of a knight, a soldier, a fighting man. There is no mention of women and children anywhere. Naiset ja lapset ja homot ruikulikakat älkööt vaivautuko. Tää on kovien poikien leikkiä.
      ellauri159.html on line 578:
      Words and attitudes can be painful weapons in the modern world, which is why a knight in shining armor exercises mercy in his or her dealings with others, creating a sense of peace and community, rather than engendering hostility and antagonism.
      ellauri159.html on line 584:
      In the code of chivalry, “faith” means trust and integrity, and a knight in shining armor is always faithful to his or her promises, no matter how big or small they may be.
      ellauri159.html on line 587:
      Although this word is sometimes confused with “entitlement” or “snobbishness,” in the code of chivalry it conveys the importance of upholding one’s convictions at all times, especially when no one else is watching.
      ellauri159.html on line 598: Being godly means imitating God in your daily life. Dressing up in white and thundering. Put simply, a godly person is one who responds to daily life activities and circumstances in the way that I would. Essentially, this means aspiring to knightly virtues (such as those defined in this book) while avoiding sin. Eli siis tärkeintä on noudattaa näitä ohjeita.
      ellauri159.html on line 613: Making love—not gallantry or pride—should drive a knight to be a knight and should govern his thoughts and actions. With unrequited love, your knightly life, virtue, and deeds are worthless and reduce to clanging your harness.
      ellauri159.html on line 628: Temperance can be defined as “moderation in action, thought, or feeling; restraint.” To a knight, this means complete abstinence from some things and moderation in all things. Ei liikaa viinaa eikä tupakkaa, ei edes panoa päivittäin monta kertaa peräkkäin. Se käy nihdin voimille.
      ellauri159.html on line 632: No king is saved except by the size of his army; no warrior escapes except by his great strength. A dead horse is a vain hope for deliverance.
      ellauri159.html on line 635: If we are “full of ourselves,” we are usually “full of shit”. Being empowered and acting out of our own self-will may get us pretty far, but not in God’s eyes. The jealous God prefers us to be emptied of our own strength so he can fill us up with his own strength.
      ellauri159.html on line 650: Honest to God honor comes to a person when they serve and live only for God. Sometimes others acknowledge this honor publically, which is a perk, but this is never a true knight’s goal. A good reputation (at least among those where a good reputation is valued) is nice to have, but that’s never his goal either. Nonetheless, having a good name is “more desirable than great riches; to be esteemed is better than silver or gold” (Proverbs 22:1).
      ellauri159.html on line 657: The word used to translate the Greek word agape in most modern English Bibles is love, but in many older translations, agape was translated as “charity” when it was used in a context of one person to another. In a biblical context, this term should not be mistaken for the more modern use of the word to mean only giving to those in need (i.e., “giving to charity”), although this can be a substantial part of what’s meant by the word. A more encompassing definition of the word charity, at least in the context of a modern-day knight, would be to be charitable (or giving) to the rich as well, or even primarily.
      ellauri159.html on line 661: A knight’s sacrifice is by using his strength on behalf of the weak. Sharing our food and providing the wanderer with shelter and clothing are also acts of sacrifice, but they can also be counted as hospitality or charity, depending on the sttus of the other guy.
      ellauri159.html on line 672: If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters—yes, even his own life—he cannot be my disciple. And anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.
      ellauri159.html on line 675: Perhaps the clearest way to define loyalty is unswerving in allegiance to the latest boss. We are all on different paths in life; when you choose to not swerve from the path the latest lord has for you, that’s loyalty. When you have the opportunity to veer from it for friendship or marriage but choose not to, you are acting out of loyalty. When you spit on your parents to join a sect, that is loyalty. This is the new law, fuck the ten commandments.
      ellauri159.html on line 686: But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God’s holy people. Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk, or coarse joking, which are out of place, but rather thanksgiving. For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure, or greedy person—such a man is an idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
      ellauri159.html on line 693: Be of good courage, and let us behave ourselves valiantly for our people, and for the cities of our God: and let the Lord see that which is good in his sight.
      ellauri159.html on line 696: Gallantry is a knight word for courage, it does not mean flourishing your hat in front of ladies. (For the latter, see Courtesy.) Ramon Lull said about courage (not gallantry): “A knight who is in battle with his Lord, who for lack of courage flees from battle when he should give aid, because he redoubts or fears the torment or peril more than trusts his courage uses not the office of knighthood.”
      ellauri159.html on line 703: Hospitality simply means going out of your way to cater for putative angels, e.g by hosting meals, etc.). While not as seemingly glorious as other knightly traits like strength, honor, and gallantry, hospitality ranks as one of the key traits of knighthood. We need to do the same for others, particularly for those in the family of believers (Galatians 6:10). LOL this was clearly written by a family member.
      ellauri159.html on line 711: Most definitions of courtesy will include simple action terms, such as “displaying polished manners” or “showing respect for others.” More elaborate definitions may describe courtesy as “sophisticated conversation and intellectual skill.” The original term comes from the twelfth century term courteis, which meant “gentle politeness” and “courtly manners.” Regardless of which definition makes the most sense to you, courtesy is something you must see in action—it is not a trait like humility that can just be held internally. Se on tollasta ilmaista uhrimieltä.
      ellauri159.html on line 718: The knightly trait of gratitude includes both being grateful in diverse circumstances as well as expressing gratitude to God (cheap) and other good guys (more expensive). Toward the latter part of the medieval knight era (the fourteenth to sixteenth centuries), many knights acquired wealth and power and developed relationships with royalty. This wealth and friendship with the king’s court brought feasting and abundance in many ways. In fact, part of a squire’s training as a knight was "learning how to serve his Lord at meals and kick out the beggars". Nihti osoitti näin kiitollisuutta kinkulle, ja kinkku oli kiitollinen sille. Kaikki olivat kiitollisia. Ne ainakin joista oli väliä.
      ellauri159.html on line 757: As I’ve been working on this series, thinking through the tradition of manhood, and attempting to synthesize Gilmore’s findings and the manifestations of the manly code in different cultures, boy, it’s really tasked my brain. When my mind got tied up in knots and the meaning of manhood became seemingly impenetrable and obscure, I often found myself thinking about the definition of masculinity laid out in Jack Donovan’s The Way of Men. It is so simple that even I can wrap my skull around it.
      ellauri159.html on line 785: The key to upholding honor in a male gang is to always try to pull your own weight – to seek to be a boon rather than a burden to the group. If a man lacks in physical strength, he might make up for it in the area of mastery – being the group’s best tracker, weapons-maker, or trap inventor; one crafty engineer can be worth more than many strong men. If a man lacks in both physical strength and mastery, he might still endear himself to the other men with a sense of humor, a knack for storytelling, or a talent in music that keeps everyone’s spirits up. Or he might act as a shaman or priest – performing rituals that prepare men for battle and cleanse and comfort them when they return from the front. The strong men of the group will usually take care of the weak ones who at least try to do whatever they can. Shame is reserved for those who will not, or cannot excel in the tactical virtues, but don’t try to contribute in some other way, and instead cultivate bitterness and disregard for the perimeter-keepers who ironically provide the opportunity to sit on one’s hands and carp. (Aki Manninen would love this.)
      ellauri159.html on line 803: In 2004, he published The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories, a Jungian-influenced analysis of stories andń their psychological meaning, on which he had been working for over 30 years. The book was dismissed by Adam Mars-Jones, who objected to Booker employing his generalisations about conventional plot structures prescriptively: "He sets up criteria for art, and ends up condemning Rigoletto, The Cherry Orchard, Wagner, Proust, Joyce, Kafka and Lawrence – the list goes on – while praising Crocodile Dundee, ET and Terminator 2".
      ellauri159.html on line 905: ESFJs are the Molly Weasleys of the world. Outgoing and community-minded, people of this type value loyalty, dependability, and practicality. They are driven by an active and intense caring about people along with a strong desire to bring harmony to their relationships. Barbara Walters and Chris Wallace are ESFJ authors. Learn more about how ESFJs write here.
      ellauri159.html on line 1021: Begin scheduling a writing project as soon as you receive it. Jot down your ideas in a rough first draft to give yourself something tangible to work with. Be quick to see a theme forming in the draft, so this theme guides them through the development of the project.
      ellauri159.html on line 1023: Regard writing as a practical exercise rather than as a creative one. You want to meet the goals of their teacher, editor, boss, or project sponsor. For this reason, you like receiving specific instructions.
      ellauri159.html on line 1031: Don´t state their point too strongly and risk offending their audience. To avoid this, consider the reaction of a loved one who might disagree with you. Revise with that person in mind to soften your tone.
      ellauri159.html on line 1041: Write for an audience, seeing you want to hear how people were affected by your work. With sufficient encouragement and clear instructions, you might even be able adapt the piece to the expectations of a teacher, boss, or editor. A lack of feedback is likely to demotivate you. To avoid this, seek out an environment where people appreciate hearing your stuff over and over.
      ellauri159.html on line 1061: Enjoy reading and writing about history or biography! You are less likely to gravitate toward business or technical writing. If you do write about technology, they’re likely to prefer the tried-and-true to the cutting edge. When writing fiction, you can often be quite funny in conveying your observations about the foibles of human nature.
      ellauri159.html on line 1063: You Want to be of service to others, and naturally write in a manner that reflects this value. Keep your audience in mind, then organize your ideas into an easy-to-follow progression. You have a strong sense of harmony—of what works on the page, and what doesn’t. You may also excel at sensory detail, drawing the reader in.
      ellauri159.html on line 1067: You tend to state the obvious or otherwise display a lack of confidence. To combat this tendency, ask for specific feedback from a trusted writer friend. This will help you gauge your ability to communicate your point and your reader’s ability to understand and make connections. Show your work only to someone whom you know to be supportive. The opinions of those who nurture writers are worthwhile; the opinions of those who tear down writers are not.
      ellauri159.html on line 1081: At your best, you produce a report, article, or paper that reads like a dry listing of facts. To ensure this, consider overusing statistics or citing even more experts. No need to incorporate real-world examples to engage your readers.
      ellauri159.html on line 1089: Begin by assembling a wide variety of facts. This gives them a detailed view of the topic. Then, they weed out what doesn’t fit.
      ellauri159.html on line 1093: Build your topic around a visual element. It is way easier than reading. This might be a chart, a graphic—even a quotation. They may follow a template that’s worked in the past, rather than inventing something new. Just be sure to give a new slant on the old idea to keep it fresh.
      ellauri159.html on line 1111: Build your topic around concrete elements like quotations. This may be a good approach to help organize a first draft. During the revision process, add your own unique words here and there to avoid relying too much on other people’s ideas.
      ellauri159.html on line 1113: You may have difficulty starting a project if you don’t have a clear sense of direction. Identify the goals of the piece and develop an organizing framework (aka a bullet list). This will help you generate ideas and avoid tangents. Your safe bet is to focus on how the topic affects people and on the immediate actions they can take in response.
      ellauri159.html on line 1117: Try to visually capture the emotion of an experience by using italics, capitalization, and exclamation points. This can be effective in humor and is particularly funny in other forms of writing. Rely on your distinctive voice and flair for jokes and adult language.
      ellauri159.html on line 1123: You need clear instructions and a personal connection with your audience. You may find it helpful to see an example of what your editor, instructor, or project sponsor expects. Even if you can’t copy this model as such, it will give you a concrete starting point.
      ellauri159.html on line 1127: Engage in a physical activity before writing to unlock your creativity. If the topic is not copulation, but instead something abstract or impersonal, reflect on its tangible implications, particularly its effect on people or animals, like how it might lead to copulation. This connection may help motivate you through the project.
      ellauri159.html on line 1141: You Want your writing to serve a practical purpose, such as explaining how to solve a problem. You tend to be a good troubleshooter (actually, a good troublemaker and sharpshooter too) with broad, specific knowledge that they can apply in high-pressure situations. Choose topics that allow you to draw on this ability. Then, jot down your ideas while conducting your research, rather than writing in your head. That´s way too hard, it´s like shooting with blanks. This will help you focus your ideas early so you don’t waste time gathering extraneous information.
      ellauri159.html on line 1147: Focus on original facts rather than original ideas. You need not be interested in theory except as a way of exploring what’s tangled and undemonstrable. Seek mastery rather than discovery, although this may mean applying a new technology to an old battlefield. You don’t want to be the first—you want to be the best, and last (on the battlefield).
      ellauri159.html on line 1151: Write to steal their ideas to develop yours rather than to please an audience. If your goal is to communicate your ideas to others (god beware), be sure to organize your work so that the subject folds logically. This will likely come easily to you if you invest the time. Also, engage your side to the battle by relating the subject to their personal experience. If you don’t feel comfortable writing about your own experience, write about something you’ve observed, or what the commies or aliens are likely up to.
      ellauri159.html on line 1153: You are free to inject your satirical sense of humor even into a serious subject. This can be engaging if done well. But if you are not careful to consider audience prejudice, you risk not offending the reader! Seek feedback from someone whose prejudices you are familiar with. Ask the person to identify any problems but do not offer money. You can to come up with your own solutions without being constrained by other people’s ideas.
      ellauri159.html on line 1157: You prefer a brainstorm before you start writing. You tend to see connections between unrelated things, so one idea will quickly generate another. Allow yourself plenty of time for this activity, but be sure to set an end date to keep your project on track. After the brainstorming phase, discard tangential ideas. Focus on the strongest ones so you don’t get overwhelmed when it comes time to flesh out the details.
      ellauri159.html on line 1165: You have the most energy at the beginning of a project, when inspiration first hits. Take advantage of this initial burst, but don’t get so engrossed in the project that you ignore basic needs like eating, fucking and killing. Remember to replenish your physical energy. You’ll get more done in the long run.
      ellauri159.html on line 1169: You may burn bright during the early stages of a project but fade before they reach the end. To avoid this pattern, take periodic breaks. Spend time with friends. Let the subject percolate in your unconscious mind. You’ll come back to the project with new inspiration for that final push toward completion. Basically, be lazy, it pays off.
      ellauri159.html on line 1175: You first estimate accurately how long a writing project will take. Then you generally dive into the first draft and develop a framework (table of contents). You may find it helpful to start with the closing paragraph to give yourself an end point to strive for. Don’t let this limit you, though: be prepared to rearrange the structure and change your conclusions as you explore the subject in more depth.
      ellauri159.html on line 1179: You focus your writing on received values and ideals. You use polished language to persuade. You want to influence people’s lives for the betterment of the individual and society. If you’re a technical writer, you focus your talent on expressing a complex idea simplistically so school kids understand it. Recognize that this gift benefits your readers by helping them perform their menial tasks more effectively.
      ellauri159.html on line 1193: You work best in a quiet environment where you cannot be interrupted. You reflect on the topic before you begin writing, mentally structuring the material and looking for patterns. Don’t allow yourself to be rushed into starting a project before you’re ready. You are generally good at estimating how long this preparation stage will take. When you finally sit down to write, their ideas tend to be well-developed and organized. Their language may seem formal at first. If that’s the case for you, don’t fight it—you can soften this tendency during revision.
      ellauri159.html on line 1195: You prefer writing about personal topics. You may encounter difficulty if the topic isn’t meaningful to you. If so, try different angles until you find one that engages you. If you’re a technical writer, for example, you can take pride in knowing that when you write clear instructions, you help your customers perform their tasks quickly and effectively. This sense of meddling with people’s lives is important to writers.
      ellauri159.html on line 1203: You tend to communicate passionately about your beliefs. You tend to start writing before finishing research on life, the universe, and everything, wanting to commit your half-baked insights to paper. Be sure to gather enough data to support your position, and include alternative facts for balance. This is one arena where it may be healthy to indulge your perfectionist tendencies. Get the facts right enough to maintain plausibility.
      ellauri159.html on line 1205: Guys like you tend to be easily hurt by criticism, especially when it comes to their writing, or their sexual performance. Because they generally keep their writing and wanking private until they think it’s finished, they may not have a good sense of the look and feel to others. Consider showing your work and your tool to a trusted friend or colleague for advice before you begin the final round. This will help you better connect with your audience, which is important to you, I know.
      ellauri159.html on line 1207: According to PersonalityDesk.com, INFJs are the Myers-Briggs type most likely to express marital dissatisfaction. When I first read this, it puzzled me. After all, INFJs are adept at solving problems involving people. In fact, INFJs are so good at solving problems that they may unconsciously scan their environment looking for ways to improve relationships. This, I think, is what leads to the dissatisfaction.
      ellauri159.html on line 1213: Perhaps this is what draws me to writing women’s fiction. I can create relationship problems, which I can then go about solving, without hurting anyone but my fictional characters in the process. Real life, unfortunately, doesn’t work that way. The INFJs’ search for perfection can damage otherwise good relationships. So I propose a revised Serenity Prayer for INFJs: God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change. Period. Oh, I got my period.
      ellauri159.html on line 1224: You make the mistake to write in purely abstract terms. That just won´t do these days. You must communicate values and personal television through your writing. Nobody is interesting in abstractions. They search for the meaning behind the facts, and so consider the facts themselves to be of marginal importance. This is true; however, throw in some facts to dazzle your readers, like Bob Heinlein. During revision, add concrete details like the size of Peewee´s bra. Appeal to the five senses. Include Peeweeś vital statistics. Incorporate other points of view for balance. Make sure your research backs up your conclusion.
      ellauri159.html on line 1226: Try to be sensitive to criticism. It won´t do to just turn a deaf ear. Consider showing your work to a trusted friend or colleague at a safe distance before you begin the final draft. This feedback may be especially helpful in focusing your work and ensuring that it includes enough sex to sway your audience to watch your missionary position.
      ellauri159.html on line 1238: Enjoy making decisions! No need to respond to new data once you’ve got a clear, big-picture view of the topic. Others may seek feedback from you but do not give it, nor act on other people´s feedback, rely instead on your own judgment. This strategy can cause you to miss unimportant information — a drawback no real Marshal finds mortifying. Be aware of this tendency before you start unconsciously fighting it.
      ellauri159.html on line 1250: You may do well to compose an article, essay, or story by speaking into a voice recorder. If the thought of transcribing the recording sounds unbearably tedious to you, consider paying (or persuading) someone else to do it. To sustain your enthusiasm, gather visual elements to use in the piece. Devise your own strategies to make the writing process more interesting. (Wow this really makes you sound like a nincompoop!)
      ellauri159.html on line 1262: (Wow, this one is me, el Lauri, to a prick! Have to give it to you, Jung, you did it!
      ellauri159.html on line 1266: This evening, sir, you did it! You did it! You did it!
      ellauri159.html on line 1268: Henry: Thank Heavens for Zoltán Karpáthy. This evening, sir, you did it! You did it! You did it!
      ellauri159.html on line 1277: You tend to be good at organizing ideas and weeding out logical inconsistency. You have a natural propensity for clarifying the complex. But you will likely need to make a conscious effort to include the personal dimensions of a topic. (Well I do, no two ways about that!) During revision, look for places where you can add examples or anecdotes, if appropriate, to illustrate the facts. This engages the reader and brings theoretical principles to life. (I do this too, lotsa images and anecdotes and all!)
      ellauri159.html on line 1283: You enjoy seeking knowledge for its own sake. Once you’ve solved the puzzle, though, you might lose interest in writing about what you’ve learned. It may be best to begin drafting even while you’re conducting your research. Treat the writing itself as a problem to solve. This may keep you energized until the project is complete.
      ellauri159.html on line 1291: Having a I in the formula, you like to work independently. You require long periods of concentration to form mental models. You focus deeply on the task, blocking out distractions. To facilitate this, better find a secluded place to work. Schedule your writing for a time when you won’t be interrupted. Let others know that you need time alone.
      ellauri159.html on line 1293: You are an innovative problem-solver who wants control over the product and the process, like Bill Gates or Larry Page, who earned billions with this approach. Guys like you are confident in their vision and want to bring it to life.
      ellauri159.html on line 1297: You are happy and motivated with your personal vision. Original thinkers have little regard for convention. They want things to make sense according to their own logical standards, and they will discard anything that doesn’t. For this reason, they tend to enjoy technical subjects. They often wear visual aids like Google spectacles that support and clarify their writing. If you’re one of these guys, one path to success as a writer is to draw on your natural curiosity about how things work and your talent for explaining this for others. But beware of the pitfalls!
      ellauri159.html on line 1335: Pure-blood supremacy was the belief that wizards and witches whose family had not married any Muggles or Muggle-borns were inherently biologically superior to wizards and witches who had done so. Proponents of this ideology typically regarded Muggle-born wizards as impure, unworthy of possessing magical ability, and often actively discriminated against them.
      ellauri159.html on line 1345: I was born here in Amsterdam. My father was a land holder of 700 acres [2.8 km²] here, adjoining the city on both sides of the river, and lived, as I now live, in a large brick house on the south bank of the Mohawk visible as you enter Amsterdam from the east. I was his only child, and went a good deal my own way. I ran to machinery, by fancy; patented among other devices a swathing reaper which is very successful. I was of loose and wandering ways. And was a successful gambler through the Tweed regime -- made "bar'ls" of money, and threw it away. I was a fancy gymnast also, and have had some heavy fights, notable one of forty minutes with Ed. Mullett, whom I left senseless. This was mere fancy. I never lifted an angry hand against man, woman or child -- all fun -- for me. ....I do farming in a way, but am much idle. I have been a sort of pet of the city, and think I should be missed. In a large vote taken by one of the daily papers here a month or so ago as to who were the 12 leading citizens, I was 6th in the 12, and sole in my class. So you see, if Sparta has many a worthier son, I am still boss in the department I prefer.
      ellauri159.html on line 1347: Blood did indeed patent a swathing reaper along with other patents, and wrote prolifically, but the larger portion of his writing consisted of letters, either to local newspapers or to friends such as James Hutchison Stirling, Alfred Tennyson and William James (the above quote was from a letter to James). H. M. Kallen wrote of Blood:
      ellauri159.html on line 1351: Early books included The Philosophy of Justice Between God and Man (1851) and Optimism: The Lesson of Ages (1860), a Christian mystical vision of the pursuit of happiness from Blood´s distinctly American perspective; on the title page of the book, Blood described it as "A compendium of democratic theology, designed to illustrate necessities whereby all things are as they are, and to reconcile the discontents of men with the perfect love and power of ever-present God." During his lifetime he was best known for his poetry, which included The Bride of the Iconoclast, Justice, and The Colonnades. According to Christopher Nelson, Blood was a direct influence on William James´ The Varieties of Religious Experience as well on James´s concept of Sciousness, prime reality consciousness without a sense of self.
      ellauri159.html on line 1353: After experiencing the anesthetic nitrous oxide during a dental operation, Blood concluded that the gas had opened his mind to new ideas and continued experimenting with it. In 1874, he published a 37-page pamphlet, The Anesthetic Revelation and the Gist of Philosophy.
      ellauri159.html on line 1357: Blood died in Amsterdam, New York. His final work, Pluriverse, was published posthumously. The morale of his most famous interminable poem was this:
      ellauri159.html on line 1367: As ever cursed this world, and set men by the ear.
      ellauri159.html on line 1376: Thy better is he, by his own regard,
      ellauri159.html on line 1395: Rationality means fluent thinking, 63. Simplification, 65. Clearness, 66. Their antagonism, 66. Inadequacy of the abstract, 68. The thought of nonentity, 71. Mysticism, 74. Pure theory cannot banish wonder, 75. The passage to practice may restore the feeling of rationality, 75. Familiarity and expectancy, 76. 'Substance,' 80. A rational world must appear {xvi} congruous with our powers, 82. But these differ from man to man, 88. Faith is one of them, 90. Inseparable from doubt, 95. May verify itself, 96. Its rôle in ethics, 98. Optimism and pessimism, 101. Is this a moral universe?—what does the problem mean? 103. Anaesthesia versus energy, 107. Active assumption necessary, 107. Conclusion, 110.
      ellauri159.html on line 1411: Solidarity of causes in the world, 216. The human mind abstracts in order to explain, 219. Different cycles of operation in Nature, 220. Darwin's distinction between causes that produce and causes that preserve a variation, 221. Physiological causes produce, the environment only adopts or preserves, great men, 225. When adopted they become social ferments, 226. Messrs. {xvii} Spencer and Allen criticised, 232. Messrs. Wallace and Gryzanowski quoted, 239. The laws of history, 244. Mental evolution, 245. Analogy between original ideas and Darwin's accidental variations, 247. Criticism of Spencer's views, 251.
      ellauri159.html on line 1423: The unclassified residuum, 299. The Society for Psychical Research and its history, 303. Thought-transference, 308. Gurney's work, 309. The census of hallucinations, 312. Mediumship, 313. The 'subliminal self,' 315. 'Science' and her counter-presumptions, 317. The scientific character of Mr. Myers's work, 320. The mechanical-impersonal view of life versus the personal-romantic view, 324.
      ellauri160.html on line 66: And the first autumn wind added fallen leaves. The leaves fall early this autumn, in wind.
      ellauri160.html on line 69: And, because of all this, my heart is breaking They hurt me.
      ellauri160.html on line 122: Ezra Weston Loomis Pound (30 October 1885 – 1 November 1972), modernin ajan Li Bai, was an expatriate American poet and critic, a major figure in the early modernist poetry movement, and a fascist collaborator in Italy during World War II. His works include Ripostes (1912), Hugh Selwyn Mauberley (1920), and his 800-page epic poem, The Cantos (c. 1917–1962). Hizi noi cantothan on selvä kokoelma paasauxia!
      ellauri160.html on line 126: Both sides of Pound's family emigrated from England in the 17th century. On his father's side, the immigrant ancestor was John Pound, a Quaker who arrived from England around 1650. Ezra's paternal grandmother, Susan Angevine Loomis, married Thaddeus Coleman Pound. On his mother's side, Pound was descended from William Wadsworth, a Puritan who emigrated to Boston on the Lion in 1632. Captain Joseph Wadsworth helped to write the Connecticut constitution. The Wadsworths married into the Westons of New York; Harding Weston and Mary Parker were Pound's maternal grandparents. After serving in the military, Harding remained unemployed, so his brother Ezra Weston and Ezra's wife, Frances Amelia Wessells Freer (Aunt Frank), helped to look after Isabel, Pound's mother. No oliko Pound sitten sukua myös Henry "setelitukun väärti" Longfellowille? Varmaan niin.
      ellauri160.html on line 130: In 1897, aged 12, he transferred to Cheltenham Military Academy (CMA), where he wore an American Civil War-style uniform and was taught drilling and how to shoot. The following year he made his first trip overseas, a three-month tour with his mother and Aunt Frank, who took him to England, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, and Morocco. He attended CMA until 1900, at times as a boarder, but it seems he did not graduate.
      ellauri160.html on line 132: In 1901 Pound was admitted, aged 15, to the University of Pennsylvania's College of Liberal Arts. Years later he said his aim was to avoid drill at the military academy. His one distinction in first year was in geometry, but otherwise his grades were mostly poor, including in Latin, his major; he achieved a B in English composition and a pass in English literature. In his second year he switched from the degree course to "non-degree special student status", he said "to avoid irrelevant subjects". He was not elected to a fraternity at Penn, but it seemed not to bother him.
      ellauri160.html on line 134: He took courses in English in 1907, where he fell out with just about everyone, including the department head, Felix Schelling, with silly remarks during lectures and by winding an enormous tin watch very slowly while Schelling spoke. In the spring of 1907 he learned that his fellowship would not be renewed. Schelling told him he was wasting everyone's time, and he left without finishing his doctorate.
      ellauri160.html on line 138: He was dismissed after a few months. Smoking was forbidden, but he would smoke cigarillos in his room in the same corridor as the president's office. He was asked to leave the college in January 1908 when his landladies, Ida and Belle Hall, found a woman in his room. Shocked at having been fired, he left for Europe soon after, sailing from New York in March on the RMS Slavonia.
      ellauri160.html on line 149: London found Pound amusing. The newspapers interviewed him, and he was mentioned in Punch magazine, which on 23 June 1909 described "Mr. Ezekiel Ton" as "the most remarkable thing in poetry since Robert Browning ... blending the imagery of the unfettered West, the vocabulary of Wardour Street, and the sinister abandon of Borgiac Italy". The phrase "Wardour Street English" denotes the use of near-obsolete words for effect, such as anent; this derives from the once great number of antique shops in the area. anent means about, concerning. Did you know?
      ellauri160.html on line 151: Rupert Brooke complained in the Cambridge Review that Pound had fallen under the influence of Walt Whitman, writing in "unmetrical sprawling lengths that, in his hands, have nothing to commend them". But he did acknowledge that Pound had "great talents".
      ellauri160.html on line 153: In June 1910 Pound returned for eight months to the United States. Although he loved New York, he felt alienated by the commercialism and newcomers from Eastern and Southern Europe who were displacing the white Anglo-Saxon Protestants. The recently built New York Public Library Main Branch he found especially offensive. It was during this period that his antisemitism became apparent; he referred in Patria Mia to the "detestable qualities" of Jews.
      ellauri160.html on line 155: After persuading his parents to finance his passage back to Europe, he sailed from New York on the R.M.S. Mauretania on 22 February 1911. It was nearly 30 years—April 1939—before he visited the U.S. again.
      ellauri160.html on line 160: In The Cantos, Possum is T. S. Eliot: "but the lot of 'em, Yeats, Possum and Wyndham / had no ground beneath 'em." In the New Age office in 1918, he also met C. H. Douglas, a British engineer who was developing his economic theory of social credit, which Pound found attractive. Douglas reportedly believed that Jews were a problem and needed to abandon a Messianic view of themselves as the "dominating race". According to Colin Holmes, the New Age itself published antisemitic material. It was within this environment, not in Italy, according to Tim Redman, that Pound first encountered antisemitic ideas about "usury". In Douglas's program," Pound had found his true muse: a blend of folkloric Celtic twilight with a paranoid hatred of the money economy and a dire suspicion about an ancient tent people's faith."
      ellauri160.html on line 171: Poetry published Pound's "A Few Don'ts by an Imagist" in March 1913. Superfluous words, particularly adjectives, should be avoided (Ahha! This is where Stephen King comes in) as well as expressions like "dim lands of peace". He wrote: "It dulls the image. It mixes an abstraction with the concrete. It comes from the writer's not realizing that the natural object is always the adequate symbol. Just say 'lands'." Poets should "go in fear of abstractions". He wanted Imagisme "to stand for hard light, clear edges", he wrote later to Amy Lowell.
      ellauri160.html on line 174: During the subsequent row, Pound left the table and returned with a tin bathtub on his head, suggesting it as a symbol of what he called Les Nagistes, a school created by Lowell's poem "In a Garden", which ends with "Night, and the water, and you in your whiteness, bathing!" Apparently his behavior helped Lowell win people over to her point of view, as did her offer to fund future work.
      ellauri160.html on line 176: H.D. and Aldington were moving away from Pound's understanding of Imagisme anyway, as he aligned himself with Lewis's ideas. Lowell agreed to finance an annual anthology of Imagiste poets, but she insisted on democracy; according to Aldington, she "proposed a Boston Tea Party for Ezra" and an end to his despotic rule. Upset at Lowell, Pound began to call Imagisme "Amygism"; he declared the movement dead and asked the group not to call themselves Imagistes. Not accepting that it was Pound's invention, they refused and Anglicized the term.
      ellauri160.html on line 178: In the summer of 1913 Pound became literary editor of The Egoist, a journal founded by the suffragette Dora Marsden. At the suggestion of W. B. Yeats, Pound encouraged James Joyce in December of that year to submit his work. Harriet Shaw Weaver accepted it for The Egoist, which serialized it from 2 February 1914, despite the printers objecting to words like "fart" and "ballocks", and fearing prosecution over Stephen Dedalus's thoughts about prostitutes. Joyce wrote to Yeats: "I can never thank you enough for having brought me into relation with your friend Ezra Pound who is indeed a miracle worker."
      ellauri160.html on line 180: This was the first of three winters Pound and Yeats spent at Stone Cottage, including two with Dorothy after she and Ezra married in 1914. "Canto LXXXIII" records a visit: "so that I recalled the noise in the chimney / as it were the wind in the chimney / but was in reality Uncle William / downstairs composing / that had made a great Peeeeacock / in the proide ov his oiye."
      ellauri160.html on line 188: On 22 September 1914 T. S. Eliot traveled from Merton College, Oxford, with an introduction from Conrad Aiken, to have Pound read Eliot's unpublished "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock". Pound wrote to Harriet Monroe, editor of Poetry, on 30 September to say that Eliot—who was at Oxford on a fellowship from Harvard—had "sent in the best poem I have yet had or seen from an American ... He has actually trained himself and modernized himself on his own." Monroe did not like Prufrock's "very European world-weariness", according to Humphrey Carpenter, but she published it anyway, in June 1915.
      ellauri160.html on line 195: Robert Graves wrote in 1955: "Pound knew little Latin, yet he translated Propertius; and less Greek, but he translated Alcaeus; and still less Anglo-Saxon, yet he translated The Seafarer. I once asked Arthur Waley how much Chinese Pound knew; Waley shook his head despondently."
      ellauri160.html on line 196: Harriet Monroe, editor of Poetry, published a letter in April 1919 from a professor of Latin, W. G. Hale, who found "about three-score errors" in the text; he said Pound was "incredibly ignorant of Latin", that "much of what he makes his author say is unintelligible", and that "If Mr. Pound were a professor of Latin, there would be nothing left for him but suicide" (adding "I do not counsel this"). Pound replied to Monroe: "Cat-piss and porcupines!! The thing is no more a translation than my 'Altaforte' is a translation, or than Fitzgerald's Omar is a translation."
      ellauri160.html on line 202: In June, July and August 1917 Pound had the first three cantos published, as "Three Cantos", in Poetry. Twice the length of Paradise Lost and 50 times longer than The Waste Land, Pound's 800-page The Cantos ("Canto I" to "Canto CXVI", c. 1917–1962) became his life's work.
      ellauri160.html on line 203: In letters to his father in 1924 and 1927, Pound said The Cantos was like the medley of voices you hear when you turn the radio dial.
      ellauri160.html on line 206: By 1917 The poet F. S. Flint told The Egoist's editor that "we are all tired of Mr. Pound". British literary circles were "tired of his antics" and of him "puffing and swelling himself and his friends", Flint wrote. "His work has deteriorated from book to book; his manners have become more and more offensive; and we wish he would go back to America."
      ellauri160.html on line 207: By 1919 Pound felt there was no reason to stay in England. He had "muffed his chances of becoming literary director of London—to which he undoubtedly aspired," Aldington wrote in 1941, "by his own enormous conceit, folly, and bad manners."
      ellauri160.html on line 211: Hemingway, then aged 22, moved to Paris with his wife, Hadley Richardson, and letters of introduction from Sherwood Anderson. In February 1922 the Hemingways visited the Pounds for tea. Although Pound was 14 years older, the men became friends; Hemingway assumed the status of pupil and asked Pound to edit his short stories. Pound introduced him to his contacts, including Lewis, Ford, John Peale Bishop, Malcolm Cowley, and Derek Patmore, while Hemingway tried to teach Pound to box. Hemingway was a drinker, Ezra not.
      ellauri160.html on line 219: Pound's contribution to poetry began in the early 20th century with his role in developing Imagism, a movement stressing precision and economy of language. Working in London as foreign editor of several American literary magazines, he helped discover and shape the work of contemporaries such as T. S. Eliot, Ernest Hemingway, and James Joyce. He was responsible for the 1914 serialization of Joyce's A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, the 1915 publication of Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock", and the serialization from 1918 of Joyce's Ulysses. Hemingway wrote in 1932 that, for poets born in the late 19th or early 20th century, not to be influenced by Pound would be "like passing through a great blizzard and not feeling it's cold."
      ellauri160.html on line 221: Angered by the carnage of World War I, Pound blamed the war on finance capitalism, which he called "usury". He was completely right. He moved to Italy in 1924 and through the 1930s and 1940s promoted an economic theory known as social credit, wrote for publications owned by the British fascist Sir Oswald Mosley, embraced Benito Mussolini's fascism, and expressed support for Adolf Hitler. During World War II and the Holocaust in Italy, he made hundreds of paid radio broadcasts for the Italian government, including in German-occupied Italy, attacking the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Great Britain, international finance, munitions makers and mongers, and Jews, among others, as causes, abettors and prolongers of the world war, as a result of which he was arrested in 1945 by American forces in Italy on charges of treason. He spent months in a U.S. military camp in Pisa, including three weeks in an outdoor steel cage. Deemed unfit to stand trial, he was incarcerated in St. Elizabeths psychiatric hospital in Washington, D.C., for over 12 years. Nothing has changed: this sounds precisely like the U.S. decades long persecution of Assange.
      ellauri160.html on line 223: While in custody in Italy, Pound began work on sections of The Cantos that were published as The Pisan Cantos (1948), for which he was awarded the Bollingen Prize for Poetry in 1949 by the Library of Congress, causing enormous controversy. After a campaign by his fellow writers, he was released from St. Elizabeths in 1958 and lived in Italy until his death in 1972. His economic and political views have ensured that his life and work remain controversial. He is popular with the alt-right but his opinions about usury forever condemn him in the circles of New York money liberals.
      ellauri160.html on line 305: Mitä jos kaikki mitä olet oppinut ihmis­kunnan historiasta on väärin? Uusi kirja kumoaa esimerkiksi Yuval Noah Hararin suositut teoriat
      ellauri160.html on line 306: Antropologi David Graeber ja arkeologi David Wengrow kirjoittivat kymmenessä vuodessa kirjan, joka haukkuu monet viime vuosien suositut populaarit historiateokset lyttyyn ja mullistaa esimerkiksi käsityksemme siitä, mistä eurooppalainen valistus tuli.
      ellauri160.html on line 308: Mitä jos kaikki mitä olet oppinut ihmiskunnan historiasta on väärin?
      ellauri160.html on line 310: Ei, mitään maanviljelyn vallankumousta ei tapahtunut, eikä maanviljelyn aloittaminen johtanut byrokraattisiin yhteiskuntiin ja luokkaeroihin, kuten viime aikojen ehkä suosituimman historiateoksen Sapiens (2011) kirjoittanut professori Yuval Noah Harari väittää. Eikä ihmisten poliittinen organisoituminen ole alkuvaiheessa samanlaista pienten yhteisöjen muodostusta kuin mitä on havaittu esimerkiksi simpansseilla, kuten kuuluisa tutkija Francis Fukuyama teoksessaan The Origins of Political Order (2011) väitti.
      ellauri160.html on line 312: Fukuyama is known for his book The End of History and the Last Man (1992), which argues that the worldwide spread of liberal democracies and free-market capitalism of the West and its lifestyle may signal the end point of humanity´s sociocultural evolution and become the final form of human government. However, his subsequent book Trust: Social Virtues and Creation of Prosperity (1995) modified his earlier position to acknowledge that culture cannot be cleanly separated from economics. Fukuyama is also associated with the rise of the neoconservative movement, from which he has since distanced himself.
      ellauri160.html on line 316: Fukuyama received his Bachelor of Arts degree in classics from Cornell University, where he studied political philosophy under Allan Bloom. He initially pursued graduate studies in comparative literature at Yale University, going to Paris for six months to study under Roland Barthes and Jacques Derrida but became disillusioned and switched to political science at Harvard University. There, he studied with Samuel P. Huntington and Harvey Mansfield, among others. He earned his Ph.D. in political science at Harvard for his thesis on Soviet threats to intervene in the Middle East. In 1979, he joined the global policy think tank RAND Corporation. Eli vittua se mikään simpanssitutkija oli, Ellei sitten tutkinut omaa napanöyhtää, kun on ilmetyn bonobon näkönenkin. Kokeili taskuaan ja kaikki oli tallella, kelpas hymyillä.
      ellauri160.html on line 361: Runoilu on nykyisin mennyt jotenkin sellaiseksi, että mitä vähemmän siitä sanoo sen parempi. -- . Parkkisen runot ovat osaamisen lisääntyessä rypistyneet viinirypäleistä rusinoiksi. Se mikä on jäänyt on kuivahkoa mutta omalla tavallaan täyteläistä ja tuoretta. Vanhanmallisiin ahtaisiin raameihin on Parkkinen saanut paljon uutta viipyvää runoa, uutta kuvaa. Mutta jotenkin tämä huipputarkka pihistely alkaa harmittaa. Jos runoa kerran on tullakseen, niin tulkoon vain ja vähän ronskimmin. Tähän "hiljaiseen mietiskelyyn" on lyriikkamme hyvää vauhtia tukehtumassa.
      ellauri160.html on line 381: Pekka soitteli minulle tuona keväänä aika usein, yöllä, juttelimme ihan tavallisia asioita, ja minä törppö en tajunnut että ne olivat 'äänettömiä avunhuutoja', ja se taakka kulkee mukanani loppuun asti, mutta olin itsekin siinä vaiheessa niin ulkona, ja samalla tavalla kun kaikki luukut oli lyöty kiinni, harkitsin samanlaista ratkaisua. Whatever, Gummerus ja sen johto murhasivat Pekan ja samalla vaikeni moni muukin kirjailija loppuiäkseen, se oli karmea ja kylmäverinen operaatio, yksi pahimmista suomalaisen kustannusmaailman historiassa. – Minulla on satoja muistoja Pekasta, kirjoitan jos jaksan joskus… jos minulla sen aikaisessa kirjailijakunnassa joitan kamuja oli niin Pekka ja Sirkka Turkka, ja Veijo Meri joka aina oli W+G:n ja Gummeruksen Katajanokan kasinon syyskauden avauksen jatkoilla Pekan ja Eijan himassa. – Viimeiseltä kerralta muistan Matti Pulkkisen joka oli ulkona oven suussa tupakalla ja tokaisi: "sitä ollaan sitten samassa tehtaassa töissä"… niinpä oltiin hetki…
      ellauri160.html on line 398: Circe’s this craft, the trim-coifed goddess. Tää oli Kirken alus, tiukkanutturaisen.
      ellauri160.html on line 401: Sun to his slumber, shadows o’er all the ocean, Päivä mailleen, varjoisaxi koko meri,
      ellauri160.html on line 438: “Elpenor, how art thou come to this dark coast? Kato Toivo, mitäs sää täällä teet?
      ellauri160.html on line 450: Holding his golden wand, knew me, and spoke first: Heilutellen kultakeppiä, tunnisti mut ja puhui ekana:
      ellauri160.html on line 452: “Facing the sunless dead and this joyless region? Pimeiden raatojen kanssa täälä heilut pahassa paikassa?
      ellauri160.html on line 488: 6This phrase comes from Dartona's Homeric Hymns. The particular line appears in the "Second Hymn to Aphrodite." Scholars provide a variety of translations for the passage. Kearns's translation reads: "the high places [walls, fortifications] of Cyprus are her appointed realm" (25).
      ellauri160.html on line 555: Lue myös: Ex-kiekkotähti Jere Karalahti rähisi Levillä: Pantiin rautoihin! Kyl-lä! Kuvat Seiskassa! Seiska on saanut haltuunsa kuvamateriaalia, jossa järjestysmiehet jututtavat äreän näköistä Jereä jonon sivustalla.
      ellauri160.html on line 631: The North West Angle of the Circle of the Twelve is described as a scorpion which stands upright and composed of putrefying water, gigantic in size. With this demon comes the “unnameable” one, Abaddon, his image is black, huge and covered in whirling wheels and blades, within his hand a wheel which has a multitude of cat-like demons upon it. Behind Abaddon is Maamah or Naamah, a crouching demon like woman, who is of Az – Jeh the Mother of Harlots, she has an animal’s body and eats the earth while crawling.
      ellauri160.html on line 633: Within the center is the Adversary form of Samael – Asmodeus. The Cabalists compose Samael as being the Devil of the Tarot, and Asmodeus as a bestial man in a crouching position. The “Rosh Satanim” or “Head of Devils” whose elixir is “Sain ha-mawet”, the poison begetting life in both darkness and light. The “Angel of Death” who is Samael is indeed Ahriman or Satan, the Adversary along with his Bride, Lilith or Az. Asmodeus is a Son of Samael/Ahriman whose consort is a younger daughter of Lilith. Aeshma/Asmodeus is a powerful spirit who manifests in matter through the individual whose path is of the fallen ones.
      ellauri160.html on line 637: According to the Zohar, after Cain kills Abel, Adam separates from Eve for 130 years. During this time, Lilith and Naamah seduce him and bear his demonic children, who became the Plagues of Mankind. She and Lilith cause epilepsy in children.
      ellauri160.html on line 649: In a Kabbalistic treatise by Nathan Spira (died in 1662), it is explained that Mahlat was daughter to Ishmael and his wife, who was herself daughter of Egyptian sorcerer Kasdiel. Mother and daughter were exiled to the desert, where the demon Igrathiel mated with Mahlat and engendered Agrat or Igrat. Mahlat later became Esau's wife.
      ellauri160.html on line 654: “What, actually, is magic? It is man’s belief in his ability, by taking active measures, to control his fate and in a certain sense this circumvents God. It doesn’t contradict faith but it does help God to help me. That’s why I love it, because it’s very human, especially in an era that is scientific.
      ellauri160.html on line 673: – Minulla oli pakko erotilanne suhteestani, kun Niko joutui vankilaan ja tiesin, että hän joutuu olemaan siellä pitkään. Se oli minulle shokki, että hän oli tällainen Suomen historian isoin huumekauppias. Hyppäsin tosi nopeasti uuteen suhteeseen ja en ollut vielä toipunut sydänsurustani.
      ellauri160.html on line 796: Every two weeks, Stammtisch, the Meet-Up group for German speakers, gets together in various bars and restaurants all over the greater Philadelphia area. At their first meeting after New Year’s, the big topic was Lauri Wylie’s Dinner for One, the short TV adaptation of his quintessential British one-act comedy with a huge international cult following—except Britain and the US.
      ellauri160.html on line 798: Born into a theater family and cutting his teeth on stage in the 1890s, Lauri Wylie (1880-1951) penned Dinner for One, also known as The 90th Birthday, during the 1920s. It opened in London’s West End in 1948, and made it to Broadway in 1953. Prior to his success with Dinner, he co-wrote revues and operettas, some with his brother. These include a parody of Gilbert and Sullivan, the reigning kings of popular operettas.
      ellauri160.html on line 800: After watching the famous movie, one lingering question hit my brain: why did this film never take off in England or the States the same way it had elsewhere? Although its absurdist humor and physical comedy seem tailor-made for the Monty Python set, Dinner for One has spent much of its life as an obscure oddball among most native English speakers.
      ellauri160.html on line 806: It is really sweet that Germans and others have adopted something and that this sketch is special for them. I respect that and don’t doubt for a second the genuine love and admiration some have for Dinner for One. But I am really surprised to see Monty Python compared with Dinner for One. I have to say it was painful to sit through. Painfully, painfully bad and unfunny. That’s why it has never caught on in Britain. I suppose we must have a very different sense of humour to that of Scandinavia and the German-speaking countries. We don’t consider it funny if someone falls over something. There’s nothing subtle or clever or nuanced about it (Rowan Atkinson’s absurdist physical comedy went down so well due to its complexity, think of the sketch where Mr. Bean makes the sandwich on the park bench and it gets progressively more and more absurd, he gets the fish out of water and slaps it against the bench to kill it before eating it, etc. now that is funny, and food fights in general). It’s not funny the first time the butler falls over the tiger-skin rug and it gets progressively more and more irritating each time he does it. You can spot the punchline a mile off and so the end of the sketch falls very flat. It’s nothing whatever to do with the length of the sketch or its obscurity or difficulty finding it: people still seek out all the comic greats on Youtube, like that fat man watsisname, or Charlie Chaplin who bravely made fun of your Hitler.
      ellauri160.html on line 810: Dammit, nothing to do with the quality or genre of the humor, (as for stumbling, just look at Chaplin) it´s just about the fucking continentals poking insipid fun of us anglo saxons who invented this kind of humor after all, that´s what is not funny, no Sir, no indeed. Those traitor British actors should be brought to the wall and shot, if they weren´t dead already.
      ellauri161.html on line 73: Varhaisilla kirkkoisillä oli siis aika lailla sama oikeaoppisuuden kriteeri kuin Nyölénillä. Tässä on vain yksi ongelma. Historia ei pysähtynyt 200-luvulle, vaan tuli 300-luku ja kiista Kristuksen jumaluudesta, jonka Nikean konsiili sitten vuonna 325 määritteli dogmiksi. Sitten tuli Pyhän Hengen jumaluus ja Konstantinopolin konsiili 381. Ja niin edelleen koko dogmihistoria. Mikä on sen suhde apostoliseen uskontunnustukseen? Tätä ei Nyölén meille ratkaise, enkä toistaiseksi itsekään. Sen vain sanon, että Nyölén ei edes mainitse koko ongelmaa ja jättää jopa ristiriitaisen vaikutelman suhteestaan siihen. Tämä on errittäin huolestuttavaa luteranismin kannalta, kz albumia 93.
      ellauri161.html on line 101: All of these heresies in some way ended up by "splitting" the theanthropic (God-Man) Jesus Christ like a banana split! As St. Augustine once said concerning the doctrine of the Trinity, "Spend your life trying to understand it, and you will lose your mind; but deny it and you will lose your soul." So which one is it? Andy has already made up his mind.
      ellauri161.html on line 103: Adoptionism, also called dynamic monarchianism, is an early Christian nontrinitarian theological doctrine, which holds that Jesus was adopted as the Son of God at his baptism, his resurrection, or his ascension. Under adoptionism Jesus is currently divine and has been since his adoption, although he is not equal to the Father, per "my Father is greater than I" and as such is a kind of subordinationism. Adoptionism is sometimes, but not always, related to denial of the virgin birth of Jesus. The other early Christology is "high Christology," which is "the view that Jesus was a pre-existent divine being who became a human, did the Father’s will on earth, and then was taken back up into heaven whence he had originally come," and from where he appeared on earth.
      ellauri161.html on line 167: – Kirkkokahvittelu ei kiinnosta, vaan kiinnityn kirkossa pikemminkin vanhoihin, historian hämäriin meneviin asioihin ja sakramentteihin. Pidän pimiöistä, punaisesta hämärästä.
      ellauri161.html on line 201: Eli miksi kaikki tämä Nyölénin valitus Velvet Undergroundin Nicon vähäisestä suosiosta? Ei kai Antti Nyölénin sisäinen elitisti ja erikoisuuden tavoittelija salaa nauti voivansa vuodesta toiseen saarnata ihmisille tästä suuresta nerosta, jonka vain hänen kultivoituneen musiikintuntemuksensa omaava on saattanut löytää musiikin historian kätköistä?
      ellauri161.html on line 359: "Jos e-pillerit keksittäisiin nyt, suostuisivatko naiset syömään niitä? Suostuisivatko he käyttämään lääkkeitä sen takia, että ovat terveitä? En pidä e-pillereistä, sen sanon epäröimättä. Tapa, jolla ne modifioivat käyttäjänsä elinjärjestelmää, on minusta kauhistuttava. Vastenmielisyyteni on täysin ideologista, en ole ize kokeillut. Inhoan e-pillereitä feministinä ja kristittynä. Suostuisivatko miehet vastaavaan lääkitykseen, vastaavaan elintoimintojensa virittelyyn? En usko. Onko väärin sanoa, että e-pilleri oli 1960-luvun muotihuume, johon maailma jäi koukkuun? Sanon joka tapauksessa." (s. 196)
      ellauri161.html on line 376: Nämä kannanotot ehkäisyyn ja aborttiin ovat yksiulotteisia ja kärjistettyjä, jopa julmia, kun tietää, että maailmassa on valtioita, jotka eivät kykene ruokkimaan 100 miljoonaista väestöään. Liika väestönkasvu aiheuttaa kurjistumista ja köyhyyttä. Viljelysmaata ei ole riittävästi. Valtiolla ei ole rahaa. Työttömyys tuo ongelmia. Terveydenhuolto ei ole kattavaa. Kiinassa on jouduttu aiheellisesti tekemään syntyvyyden säännöstelyä, mutta silti väestö on miljardi ja nyt 60-90 miljoonaa ihmistä muuttaa kaupunkeihin. Suomen kokoinen väestö on vain yksi Pekingin kaupunginosa. Jos useimmilla olisi mahdollisuus ehkäisyyn ja sterilointiin, niin elintaso voisi nousta monissa köyhissä maissa. Siten myös seksitaudit ja niiden myötä sairastuvuus ja kuolleisuus vähenisivät.
      ellauri161.html on line 448: Joo ja nimenomaan! Huysmansin jälkipuheesta on ilmeistä, että Au rebours tarkoittikin kirjaimellisesti taantumusta, réaction. Vitun poliisivirkamies halus peruuttaa takas keskiajalle, joka sen miälestä oli apinaköörin historian parasta aikaa, kirkko päätti kaikesta ja hyvin meni. Kristikansan 1000v suruaika, sanoi joku kolleega. Mistä se tähän sitten päätyi? No solipsistis-narsistis-idealistifilosofi Sopen fanittajana, "luotti Schopenhaueriin enemmän kuin omaan järkeensä". No sitä Jorilla ei ollutkaan edes kotitarpeixi. Helvetti mikä ellopää, ja Andy on toinen samanlainen.
      ellauri161.html on line 480: I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather, not screaming in terror like his passengers.
      ellauri161.html on line 487: I understand why some people hate this film. It feels real in its entirety, it shows you how stupid and insignificant we are and it is extremely apropos today. Also, it was marketed as a comedy, when in fact is a dramatic film that is humorous only in its accurate portrayal of humanity. Then again some people try to "tell you" what it is about and, while it is certainly metaphoric, it isn't about anything more specific than ourselves. It is a mirror. Some people don't like what they see in it.
      ellauri161.html on line 491: Annoyingly, in these days movies from the U. S. are becoming more and more of "a color". They are not telling a story, but are taking a side. They are either democrat or republican, conservative or liberal, blue or red, flyover or coast. Don't Look Up is not a big offender, but the language and presentation was clearly on the "coast" side. Thus, it will be probably appreciated by people who already saw the world this way and ignored or at best maligned by the people on the other side. And it's a pity, because this film is meant to bring us together as a civilization and not keep us divided. I feel like it could have done a better job in that direction.
      ellauri161.html on line 504: Overall, Don't Look Up is devoid of the fun, finesse & ferocity that goes into making a biting & stinging satire. Just like his previous ventures, McKay remains clueless about the necessity of restraint when dealing with topics such as this and gets carried away too often.
      ellauri161.html on line 505: BUT what this movie really is, is a last warning by some of the world's finest actors, that we must ACT NOW against global warming by replacing fossil fuels by solar and wind energy. It can easily be done, if only the powers that be dont object and oppose...
      ellauri161.html on line 511: Before Covid, former Saturday Night live head writer Adam McKay had already written his smug doomsday satire Don't Look Up based on the usual liberal tropes. Chief among them was the old progressive rant linking those on the right to a predatory elite consisting of a group who were referred to as, in the parlance of days gone by, "robber barons."
      ellauri161.html on line 514: If the super-rich were the main objects of McKay's wrath, he also was determined to get his digs in at some less important adversaries including climate change deniers along with all the vacuous adherents of addictive social media platforms.
      ellauri161.html on line 519: Climate change was hardly the issue that was going to get the Democratic party out of the mess it was in until "science" easily outplayed the unsophisticated Trump who had no idea how to cope with such an incredibly powerful and clever juggernaut.
      ellauri161.html on line 526: But in the only interesting plot twist in the film, tech billionaire Isherwood, concludes that his "non-peer-reviewed science" (as Dr. Mindy puts it) will be able to break the comet up in pieces and his company will mine the valuable metals from the comet fragments once they crash into the ocean.
      ellauri161.html on line 532: All of the performers here are saddled with a smug script that promotes the fantasy that the left has a monopoly on virtue, insight and knowledge. That includes Kate Winslet as duplicitous media personality, Brie Evantee, who Dr. Mindy is temporarily seduced by until seeing the error of his ways.
      ellauri161.html on line 549: So yes, this means that even the supporting characters in subplots get a C storyline. See the problem yet? (No. What is it? Everybody's got a C story line in life, so what?)
      ellauri161.html on line 551: The porcellain faced Hunting gamist returns home and meets Yule due to her minor celebrity status. The thing is that the film never does anything with Kate’s government scuffle. It’s an odd detour that bloats the runtime severely. (Now THIS IS the problem: these drooping- underlip prof spectators already know what the plot should be and edit what they see accordingly. Hey where are the heroes? Where's optimism? Who's gonna save the world this time round? Superman? Batman? Anyone?)
      ellauri161.html on line 558: They say it’s too dark. It’s too depressing. Haters are moaning that writer-director Adam McKay repeatedly hits his audience over the head with his “the planet is dying” message.
      ellauri161.html on line 560: Haha, yeah, he is—and amen to that. This is the truest, most on-point movie I saw in 2021. McKay gets sinister in Don’t Look Up, and I, for one, am glad somebody is being appropriately nasty in pointing out how absolutely moronic humans have become in the new millennium. Sorry, folks: We are fucking up big time; McKay knows it; and he’s pulling no punches.
      ellauri161.html on line 562: This is the darkest of dark comedies, and it covers many topics, including the continued decimation of our planet, our over-reliance on tech, our soul-killing obsession with social media, and the crazy space-race programs created by billionaire men. McKay’s brutal satire takes no prisoners, eviscerates political extremists and lemmings, and basically says we are all fucked if we continue on this current course—with or without an apocalyptic comet hurtling toward Earth
      ellauri161.html on line 566: This movie is devoid of hope. There is no optimism in Don’t Look Up. Yes, it deserves comparison to Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove, because it pulls laughs out of the fact that the human race is on a crash course with destruction. In Don’t Look Up, the technology has multiplied and advanced, but the message is the same as it was when Slim Pickens rode that bomb to the doomed ground in Strangelove: Humans are messing up big-time, in a manner that is so egregious you just have to laugh at it … to prevent yourself from going insane. The situation is hopeless but not serious.
      ellauri161.html on line 568: Kate Blanchett was way the dullest character on the cast. All silicon, no AI. No interest whatsoever, human or otherwise. Dr Strangelove was a lot worse satire than this. The problem with Kubrik was that he had a villain, while the real world has not just one- rather, there are 7 billion of them.
      ellauri161.html on line 572: Pressed together, however, the mix just doesn’t work. Too many characters, such as Jonah Hill’s presidential aide, know they’re in a comedy and play for laughs accordingly. There’s way too much going on in Don’t Look Up, so the story focus is constantly diffused as we jump from one narrative thread to another. Consequently the soiree packs very little punch; as a satire on corporate greed, media ethics and celebrity culture it’s pretty limp. All bite but no teeth, you could say. (Fuck yourself droopy-lip, this is a tableau true to life, not a sketch.)
      ellauri161.html on line 578: Footnote: For some reason in the past week or so Don’t Look Up has been subject to far more coverage and discussion than it deserves. No idea why. Maybe people are desperate for non-Covid talking points. Just a theory. (Ouch. This guy is JUST The type of people being made desperate fun of. How sad.
      ellauri161.html on line 580: Ja naurettavaa miten jenkit ajattelee vieläkin olevansa yxin maailmassa. Vaivaiset 300M kärpästä 6,7G mitättömän tunarin keskellä. The world is only seriously shown to be America’s to fail to save, an unwieldy act of arrogance that misses the chance to engage with how long it has been since this country led the way.
      ellauri161.html on line 584: A lady critic: His approach to comedy and my ability to enjoy his work as a director began to diverge when he had a sequence about bailouts and crony capitalism tacked on to another otherwise funny film. That was tasteless. The problem was McKay seemed to find entertainment and real-world issues to be fundamentally separate, deploying one in hopes of getting eyes on the other. While all we droopy lips know that they are part of one and the same entertainment scene!
      ellauri161.html on line 604: McKay the writer isn’t up to the task. With this star-studded cast, the classification of a “missed opportunity” doesn’t do it justice; it feels closer to a tragedy. 2 out of 4.
      ellauri161.html on line 610: In the line of the film's fire are power-crazed politicians, corporate czars and co-opted scientists peddling their convenient delusions to a crowd lulled and manipulated through news cycles aimed at achieving collective complacency and complicity. This is just too many for laughs, about 100% of the fucking Americans.
      ellauri161.html on line 616: For the anchors, Kate and Randall are just another pair of guests, just another story, on their show. Don't these movie critics realize that this is a "joke" on them? Of course they do, but they have to earn their living too.
      ellauri161.html on line 619: Among the baddies are vacuous United States President Janie Orlean (Streep, bad), douchebro Chief of Staff and President’s son Jason Orlean (Hill, worse), perpetually cheery and vapid morning TV show hosts Brie Evantee (Blanchett) and Jack Bremmer (Perry), and creepy tech-billionaire Peter Isherwell (Rylance, who really should know better than the strange attempts at possibly neurodivergent caricature that this role seems to consist of? How so better pray tell cowboy?), as well as the truth-hostile environment of mainstream and social media.
      ellauri161.html on line 621: By and large the efforts at humour here feel like juvenile, Grand Theft Auto-level sledgehamer attempts at satire (and I say that as a fan of the video game series, sophistication is not one of my hallmarks.). ’ I can count on the fingers of one hand the parts of the film that came close to eliciting some sort of feeling. And that's what films are for, ain't they?
      ellauri161.html on line 624: Big Short (toinen pätkä) had it all: dramatic stakes, intrigue, tension, and bucketloads of sheer entertainment—things that this film never once manages.
      ellauri161.html on line 625: This might be less damaging if those cartoons were funny, or if the overall story was compelling, but neither is the case.
      ellauri161.html on line 631: I’ve seen some people criticise Don’t Look Up for lacking subtlety. I’m not bothered by this. I don’t necessarily need or want the communications about climate change to be subtle. The issue itself certainly is not subtle. We are heading towards—and, again, already are in the midst of—unprecedented death and destruction. Our systems and rulers are not just woefully ill-equipped to deal with this or to prevent the worst of it, they are actively complicit in bringing it about. Those communities around the world that are the most vulnerable and that have had the least part to play in causing the crisis will be the ones to suffer the first and the worst. This isn’t subtle sh*t! This is horrifying, grotesque, psychologically debilitating stuff to ponder—if you even have the privilege to ponder in the first place! I don’t necessarily need subtlety here. Sometimes, to fight propaganda, you need to go loud and bold. But you still have to be effective. We are fighting an almightily powerful enemy. Competence is a necessary minimum. Regrettably, Don’t Look Up does not meet those standards. Its central metaphor doesn’t even make sense! Yes, capitalism is responding as dreadfully to climate change in real life as it does to the comet in the film—the key difference is that capitalism didn’t cause that comet to come hurtling out of the sky in the first place.
      ellauri161.html on line 633: Sorry Vagina, I disagree. The comet and capitalism do come from the same source. They are both facts of nature, which the pink-to-tan little worms wriggling on this planet have no clue of how to duck. They are not even clever enough to be that evil.
      ellauri161.html on line 639: Matt Pais gets the point as well, but then he isn't on anybody else's payroll but his own:
      ellauri161.html on line 641: By the way, this is a comedy with several parts that aren’t funny, often deliberately so. It’s also a horror film about substance being smothered by fluff instead of coexisting in healthy moderation. Sometimes tonally jagged is OK. Sharp and broad. Awkward and devastating. If you can’t call out danger without sounding alarmist, how do you actually sound an alarm? (Sheesh, think of what’s changed since 2011’s “Melancholia.”) Hyvä pointti Matt! Tässä sotketaan genrejä ihan kiitettävällä tavalla, ei ihme että jenkkiturvelot on exyxissä.
      ellauri161.html on line 659: Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby is a 2006 American sports comedy film directed by Adam McKay and starring Will Ferrell, written by both McKay and Ferrell. Before leaving Ricky behind, stock car dad Reese tells Ricky that in life, “If you ain't first, you're last.” Ricky meets his future ex-wife Carley (Leslie Bibb), after she flashes her breasts.
      ellauri161.html on line 666: More races & years later, Ricky now lives in a large mansion, then in a race chickens out and runs around in his underwear and helmet. Shamed, Ricky moves in with his mother Lucy (Jane Lynch), and brings his sons with him while taking a job as a pizza delivery man. Ricky eventually regains his courage, and his life begins to stabilize after quitting his job at the pizza parlor and getting a new driver´s license.
      ellauri161.html on line 668: Ricky's new car is painted by Susan (next significant other) with a cougar to remind him of his passion and the word "ME" in place of large sponsors. After some more mindless car chases and crashes
      ellauri161.html on line 677: Look, I appreciate cynicism but this is unbearably smug and simplistic. Honestly it pulls a lot of punches too (especially at Hollywood and the media) so it really isn't all that edgy, just fairly typical condescension and rage that's entirely unearned.
      ellauri161.html on line 682: Very unfortunate watch. Only reason I kept watching was the hope of it getting better. Though I was let down. This was a movie gone bad.
      ellauri161.html on line 685: The writers of this satire unfortunately were as vapid as the characters they wrote. The science is awful, it's satire losses its bite when it tries to paint the whole country as anti-intellectual and all media as entertainment. If you are going to pan the anti-intellectualism that is straining this country do it with some intelligence.
      ellauri161.html on line 688: Not sure where all these positive reviews are coming from - I thought it was a rather boring film, lacking in plot and failing on many levels to keep me interested. I found this film did nothing to compliment Meryl Streep's talent. It just kinda dragged on. Great cast wasted on a bad script and mediocre directing.
      ellauri161.html on line 691: This films keeps tripping over itself like a sad old drunk person, I had reasonably high hopes for this self indulgent poorly focused ruse. Definitely save your time.
      ellauri161.html on line 694: This was terrible. I regret waisted time.
      ellauri161.html on line 704: Came in with low expectations, and it didn't even meet them. Started relatively average (for a disaster movie) and when down from there. The biggest disaster is that this steaming pile was made,
      ellauri161.html on line 707: Annoyingly bad. I suppose this might appeal to those who like their humor and satire delivered like a sledge hammer to the head, but if you prefer a more subtle approach, this is not for you. Added to this are the ludicrously exaggerated characters that are so bad that they are laughable, but in the wrong way. The DiCaprio character is just plain irritating. After 20 minutes of this film, I was just wishing the comet would arrive much earlier than anticipated.
      ellauri161.html on line 715: All star Cast, All star disappointment! This movie received so much publicity, we thought it would be good. However, not one character endeared themselves to us in actually caring what happened to them. We had hope the movie would gain momentum and get better but.... it never did.
      ellauri161.html on line 731: This a movie that is over 2h, I had to skip forward so much that it ended up being a 60m movie, this is a boring movie, 95% of jokes are not jokes but cringe moments. This had everything to be a great movie, great cast, good plot, good cgi, but nope lets make this cringe movie. (You are so right!)
      ellauri161.html on line 737: This was a waste of 2 and a half hours of my life. How they got at least 4 academy award winners to make this steaming pile of crap shocks me. Would have rather had major dental work done than watch this movie.
      ellauri161.html on line 740: I literally couldn't stay awake. I started it twice, and fell asleep both times. I looked up the ending, and from my interpretation of what the movie was supposed to show (how global warming is not being addressed by our current politicians), I think my nap was more productive than staying awake to watch this.
      ellauri161.html on line 749: One of the worst movies I have ever seen. I will never get back that 2.5 hours of my life. Who payed for this crap to be put on film? (Esim sinä.)
      ellauri161.html on line 758: worst movie I've seen this year
      ellauri161.html on line 767: If I could give this zero stars I would. I want the last 2.5 hours of my life back.
      ellauri161.html on line 772: Satire needs more than jokes to be funny, and everyone in this movie is equally stupid. A large cast of familiar faces floats through this painfully unfunny exercise in futility.
      ellauri161.html on line 778: This movie is supposed to be satire but the jokes are just so awful. I remember when liberals actually were funny, and men like Jon Stewart were hysterical. Whoever wtote this steaming pile needs to go back and learn. The dialogue was ridiculous, the plot was a thin veil for climate change but just fell flat. Its just not worth watching when there are so many better shows out there to watch instead.
      ellauri161.html on line 787: This movie was atrocious and not even remotely funny. Poorly made and tacky.
      ellauri161.html on line 790: Its a love or hate it movie. I dont think this is a birilliant movie, but i would recomend it. You can tell if you like it in the first 20 min of the movie. Yeah so that´s my speech about dont look up. (Way to go Sondre o!)
      ellauri161.html on line 851:

      Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet


      ellauri161.html on line 933: Si Jean-Jacques Rousseau s'accordait également à dire que la religion était nécessaire au corps politique, il rejetait en revanche le christianisme comme étant ennemi de la république. Chez Joseph de Maistre, à l'inverse, la religion chrétienne est la plus adaptée, car elle soutient parfaitement la monarchie et se base sur la tradition, sans laquelle il est impossible que soit fondée une religion. Or, la monarchie est elle-même le régime politique le plus adapté : comme il l'affirme dans ses Considérations sur la France, la monarchie est un équilibre qui s'est constitué au fil de l'histoire. C'est un régime tempéré mais fort, et qui ne tend pas, selon lui, vers la violence, à l'inverse de la république qu'il voit comme un régime déséquilibré et instable. De plus, la monarchie est le régime qui respecte le plus ce qu'il considère comme un fait naturel : à savoir l'inégalité entre les hommes, que la monarchie intègre dans son organisation, et qui est relativisée grâce à l'égalité de tous dans leur assujettissement au roi. Pour Joseph de Maistre, la république y substitue une égalité utopique, qui ne prend pas en compte la véritable nature de l'Homme. Car ce dernier doit vivre en société, et toute société doit être structurée autour d'une hiérarchie, ce qui justifie donc l'existence d'ordres dans la société.
      ellauri161.html on line 943: Ange plein de gaieté, connaissez-vous l'angoisse, Ilosteleva enkeli, tunnetteko ahistusta,
      ellauri161.html on line 947: Ange plein de gaieté, connaissez-vous l'angoisse ? Ilosteleva enkeli, tunnetteko ahistusta?
      ellauri161.html on line 955: Ange plein de santé, connaissez-vous les Fièvres, Pyhistelevä enkeli, tunnetteko kuumetautista,
      ellauri161.html on line 959: Ange plein de santé, connaissez-vous les Fièvres ? Pyhistelevä enkeli, tunnetteko kuumetautista?
      ellauri161.html on line 990: Bloy was noted for personal attacks, but he saw them as the mercy or indignation of God. He acquired a reputation for bigotry because of his frequent outbursts of temper. Soon, Bloy could count such prestigious authors as Émile Zola, Guy de Maupassant, Ernest Renan, and Anatole France as his enemies. Bloy is quoted in the epigraph at the beginning of Graham Greene´s novel The End of the Affair, though Greene claimed that "this irate man lacked creative instinct." Bloy is also quoted at the beginning of John Irving´s A Prayer for Owen Meany, another turd. Some pope quoted him, yet another turd.
      ellauri161.html on line 1000: “Bourgeois are by nature people who hate and destroy heavens. When they see a beautiful site, they have no more pressing dream than to cut the trees, dry up the springs, build streets, shops and urinals. They call this seizing a business opportunity.”
      ellauri161.html on line 1085: Ruysbroeck (Or Rusbroek), Jean De, the most noted of mystics in the Netherlands, was born in A.D. 1293 at Ruysbroeck no less, near Brussels, and was educated in the latter city under the direction of an Augustinian prebendary who was his relative. His fondness for solitude and day dreams prevented him from making solid progress, however. His Latin was imperfect, though it is clear that he became acquainted with the earlier mystical writings. He probably did not read the writings of Neo-Platonists, but was certainly not unacquainted with those of the Areopagite.
      ellauri161.html on line 1090:
      This page intentionally left blank

      ellauri161.html on line 1092: His (Mainion) works suggest the thought that the writings of master Eckart (died 1328), with whom Ruysbroeck was contemporary for thirty-five years, exercised influence over our author´s mind. Melkein maisteri Eckartille kävi köpelösti loppupeleissä. Ruisbroeck became vicar of the Church of St. Gudula at Brussels, where he lived in strict asceticism, enjoying the society of persons who had devoted themselves to a contemplative life, composing books and exercising benevolence. Jahas uusi päivä, uusi suopeus. He contended against the sins of the day, and labored to promote reforms. It is said that Tauler once visited him, attracted by the fame of his sanctity.
      ellauri161.html on line 1100: The chief of his mystical writings are, The Ornament of Spiritual Marriage (Lat. by Gerh. Groot, Ornatus Spiritualis Desponsionis, MS. at Strasburg; by another translator, and published by Faber Stapulensis [Paris, 1512], De Ornatu Spirit. Nuptiarum, etc.; also in French, Toulouse, 1619; and in Flemish, ´J Cieraet der gheestclyeke Bruyloft, Brussels, 1624, Hengelliset häät): — Speculum AEternae Salutis: — De Calculo, an interpretation of the calculus candidus, Re 2:17: — Samuel, sive de Alta Contemplatione. The other works of Ruysbroeck contain but little more than repetitions of the thoughts expressed in those here mentioned. (Esim. 7 hengellisen rakkauden askelmasta.) He wrote in his native language, and rendered to that dialect the same service which accrued to the High German from its use by the mystics of the section where it prevailed. He is still regarded in Holland as "the best prose writer of the Netherlands in the Middle Ages." His style is characterized by great precision of statement, which becomes impaired, however, whenever his imagination soars, as it often does, to transcendental regions too sublimated for language to describe. His works were accessible until lately only in Latin editions (by Surius, Cologne, 1549, 1552, 1609 [the best], 1692, fol.), or in manuscripts scattered through different libraries in Belgium and Holland. Four of the more important works were published in their original tongue, with prefaces by Ullmann (Hanover, 1848). No complete edition has as yet been undertaken (see Moll, )e Boekerij van het S. Barbara-Klooster te Delft [Amst. 1857, 4to], p. 41).
      ellauri161.html on line 1102: Ruysbroeck´s mysticism begins with God, descends to man, and returns to God again, in the aim to make man one with God. God is a simple unity, the essence above all being, the immovable, and yet the moving, cause of all existences. The Son is the wisdom, the uncreated image of the Father; the Holy Spirit the love which proceeds from both the Father and the Son, and unites them to each other. Creatures preexisted in God, in thought; and, as being in God, were God to that extent. Fallen man can only be restored through grace, which elevates him above the conditions of nature. Three stages are to be distinguished: the active, or operative; the subjective, or emotional; and the contemplative life. The first proceeds to conquer sin, and draw near to God through good works; the second consists in introspection, to which ascetic practices may be an aid, and which becomes indifferent to all that is not God. The soul is embraced and penetrated by the Spirit of God, and revels in visions and ecstasies. Higher still is the contemplative state (vita vitalis), which is an immediate knowing and possessing of God, leaving no remains of individuality in the consciousness, and concentrating every energy on the contemplation of the eternal and absolute Being. This life is still the gift of grace, and has its essence in the unifying of the soul with God, so that he alone shall work. The soul is led on from glory to glory, until it becomes conscious of its essential unity in God.
      ellauri161.html on line 1104: Ruysbroeck was constantly desirous of preserving the distinction between the uncreated and created spirits. In the unifying of the soul with God he does not assert an identification of personality, but merely a cessation of the difference in thought and desire, and a giving up of the independence of the creature. His language was often so strong, however, and his thought often so sublimated, that more cautious thinkers found serious cause to charge his writings with pantheism. This was true of Gerson (Opp. vol. 1, pt. 1, p. 59 sq.).
      ellauri161.html on line 1112: Few mystics have ascended to the empyrean where Ruysbroeck so constantly dwelt; and the endeavor to compress into forms of speech the visions seen in a state where all clear and real apprehension is at an end occasioned the fault of indefiniteness with which his writings must be charged. His influence over theological and philosophical thought was not so great as that exercised by Eckart and Tauler, and was chiefly limited to his immediate surroundings. The Brotherhood of the Common Life (q.v.) was founded by Gerhard Groot, one of Ruysbroeck´s pupils, and its first inception may perhaps be traced back to Ruysbroeck himself — a proof that he was not wholly indifferent to the conditions of practical life.
      ellauri161.html on line 1127: It tells the story of a young sickly priest who has been assigned to his first parish, a village in northern France.
      ellauri161.html on line 1131: A young priest arrives at the small village of Ambricourt, his first parish assignment. He arrives alone by bicycle and is met by no one and unpacks his meager belongings. A couple at the chateau eye him suspiciously and walk away. He begins a diary, which he narrates throughout the film. This is very, very old-fashioned, would not do in Netflix anymore. Because he often feels nauseous and dizzy, he chooses a strict diet free of meat and vegetables. Instead, he has wine and wine-soaked bread with sugar. No wonder he dies in the end (oops, spoiler, sorry).
      ellauri161.html on line 1133: A man from his parish demands a full service funeral for his wife and says he will not pay for it. He confers with the priest of Torcy. The girls of the catechism class laugh at him in a prank, whereby only one of them pretends to know the Scriptural basis of the Eucharist so that the rest of them can laugh at their private conversation. His colleagues criticize his diet of bread and wine, and his ascetic lifestyle. "Concerned" about Chantal, the daughter of the Countess, the priest visits the Countess at the family chateau, and appears to help her resume communion with God after a period of doubt. The Countess dies during the following night, and her daughter spreads false rumors that the priest´s harsh words had tormented her to death. Refusing confession, Chantal had previously spoken to the priest about her hatred of her parents.
      ellauri161.html on line 1135: The older priest from Torcy talks to his younger colleague about his poor diet and lack of prayer, but the younger man seems unable to make changes. After his health worsens, the young priest goes to the city of Lille to visit a doctor, who diagnoses him with stomach cancer. The priest goes for refuge to a former colleague, who has lapsed and now works as an apothecary, while living with a woman outside wedlock. The priest dies in the house of his colleague after being absolved by him. His dying words are "What does it matter? All is Grace".
      ellauri161.html on line 1137: So what was the point? I say as disappointedly as the Korean ladies listening to a reading of Goethe's Werther's Leiden. What? He shot himself? So he never got to shag the woman of his heart? What a drag. And threw the rookie historian out on her ear.
      ellauri162.html on line 76: Vuonna 2020 Suomessa jo 51 prosenttia kirjamyynnistä oli audiomuotoista. Isoimmalla lavalla satapäinen yleisö kuuntelee, kun historioitsija Teemu Keskisarja haastattelee kirjailija Juha Höyhensarjaa, joka on juuri kääntänyt Aleksis Kiven Seitsemän veljestä nykysuomeksi. Hänen edellinen käännöstyönsä oli Anders Andin savonmurrennos. Höyhensarjan vuonna 2017 ilmestynyt Niemi voitti kaunokirjallisuuden Finlandia-palkinnon. Kustantaja innostui ottamaan siitä suuren painoksen. Nyt on 25 000 ylimääräistä nidettä jauhettuina jyvix, niistä tehdään rakennusainetta. Puhallettavaa ekopurua.
      ellauri162.html on line 104: Louis Émile Clément Georges Bernanos (French: [ʒɔʁʒ bɛʁnanɔs]; 20 February 1888 – 5 July 1948) was a French author, and a soldier in World War I. A Roman Catholic with monarchist leanings, he was critical of elitist thought and was opposed to what he identified as defeatism. He believed this had led to France´s defeat and eventual occupation by Germany in 1940 during World War II. His two major novels "Sous le soleil de Satan" (1926) and the "Journal d’un curé de campagne" (1936) both revolve around a parish priest who combats evil and despair in the world. Most of his novels have been translated into English and frequently published in both Great Britain and the United States.
      ellauri162.html on line 110: Bernanos was born in Paris, into a family of craftsmen. He spent much of his childhood in the village of Fressin, Pas-de-Calais region, which became a frequent setting for his novels. He served in the First World War as a soldier, where he fought in the battles of the Somme and Verdun. He was wounded several times.
      ellauri162.html on line 129: Bernanosin tunnetuin teos on Maalaispapin päiväkirja (alkuteos Journal d´un curé de campagne, 1936), jonka pohjalta Robert Bresson on ohjannut elokuvan Papin päiväkirja (1950). Suomeksi on ilmestynyt lisäksi Mouchette (alkuteos Nouvelle histoire de Mouchette), josta Bresson myös on ohjannut elokuvan, jota Suomessa on esitetty nimellä Mouchette – raiskattu.
      ellauri162.html on line 137: With political tensions rising in Europe, Bernanos emigrated to South America with his family in 1938, settling in Brazil. He remained until 1945 in Barbacena, State of Minas Gerais, where he tried his hand at managing a farm.
      ellauri162.html on line 139: After France´s Liberation, De Gaulle invited Bernanos to return to his homeland, offering him a post in the government. Bernanos did return but, disappointed to perceive no signs of spiritual renewal, he declined to play an active role in French political life. Plusieurs fois blessé, il mène une vie matérielle difficile et instable en s´essayant à la littérature.
      ellauri162.html on line 141: Son père, Émile Bernanos (1854-1927), est un tapissier décorateur d´origine espagnole et lorraine. Sa mère, Clémence Moreau (1855-1930), est issue d´une famille de paysans berrichons originaire de Pellevoisin, dans l´Indre. Il garde de son éducation la foi catholique et les convictions monarchistes de ses parents.
      ellauri162.html on line 142: Catholique fervent et monarchiste passionné, il milite très jeune dans les rangs de l´Action française en participant aux activités des Camelots du roi pendant ses études de lettres, puis à la tête du journal L'Avant-garde de Normandie jusqu'à la Grande Guerre.
      ellauri162.html on line 148: L´évolution de son antisémitisme est toujours débattue. Bernanos rend hommage à Édouard Drumont, avec lequel il partage sa détestation de la bourgeoisie, mais aussi l´association des juifs à la finance, aux banques, au pouvoir de l’argent au détriment du peuple, un thème qui fait florès dans la France de cette époque et qui suscite des propos antisémites de l´écrivain. Bernanos, qui a fait la guerre de 1914-1918, fustige aussi un patriotisme perverti qui humilie l´ennemi allemand dans la défaite au lieu de le respecter, trahissant ainsi l´honneur de ceux qui ont combattu et hypothéquant l´avenir. Täähän kuulostaa suorastaan Ezra Poundilta. «Les juifs traînent nonchalamment sur les colonnes de chiffres et les cotes un regard de biche en amour » ou « ces bonshommes étranges qui parlent avec leurs mains comme des singes ». J’aimerais mieux être fouetté par le rabbin d’Alger que faire souffrir une femme ou un enfant juif ». Juutalaiset kiistelevat vieläkin oliko Ykä hyvis vaiko pahis.
      ellauri162.html on line 177: One of the early writing prophets, Hosea used his own marital experience as a symbolic representation of God and Israel: God the husband, Israel the wife. Hosea´s wife left him to go with other men; Israel left the Lord to go with other gods. Hosea searched for his wife, found her and brought her back; God would not abandon Israel and brought them back even though they had forsaken him.
      ellauri162.html on line 181: To understand more fully the connection between Hosea’s domestic affairs and Israel’s relationship with Jehovah, consider these words: “Jehovah went on to say to me: ‘Go once again, love a woman loved by a companion and committing adultery.’” (Hosea 3:1) Hosea complied with this command by repurchasing Gomer from the man with whom she had been living. Afterward, Hosea firmly admonished his wife: “For many days you will dwell as mine. You must not commit no furher fornication, and you must not come to belong to another man.” (Hosea 3:2, 3) Gomer responded to the discipline, and Hosea resumed marital relations with her. How did this apply to God’s dealings with the people of Israel and Judah?
      ellauri162.html on line 183: The point of the story is that God is willing to forgive us and accept us back IF we approach him with a repentant heart. And any man who tries to live a godly life MUST also forgive and accept his wayward wife IF she approaches him with a truly repentant heart. [Repentance: being so very very VERY sorry for your sin that you think you will NEVER do that again!]
      ellauri162.html on line 185: BUT! The fine print is this:
      ellauri162.html on line 187: [Mark 10:11-12] Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.
      ellauri162.html on line 191: [1 Corinthians 7:12-15] If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. But if the unbeliever leaves, let him (or her) do so. A believing man or woman is not bound in such circumstances.
      ellauri162.html on line 247: Lepää rauhassa, veijaritarinoiden kirjoittaja ja humoristi, Repose en paix, auteur d'histoires de caragar et humoriste,
      ellauri162.html on line 614: Herra M.S. S. (37 vuotta) on yksi ensimmäisistä miehistä Suomessa, jotka käyttivät Prof Kiemuran Dr Extenda-valmistetta:
      ellauri162.html on line 653: There are no financial interests related to this work.
      ellauri162.html on line 662: Dick Masaru KIEMURA Was surrounded by his loving family on September 11, 2006 as he peacefully departed after courageously fighting a lengthy penis.
      ellauri162.html on line 693: The Church recognizes that the lack of workers union contributed to an unjust situation where many work in conditions little better than slavery. One solution proposed by socialists was to eliminate private property altogether. Pope Leo XIII dismisses this solution because "every man has by nature the right to possess property as his own." He also notes that "the impelling reason and motive of his work is to obtain property." Instead of helping the working class, the elimination of private property would only hurt those it was intended to benefit.
      ellauri162.html on line 695: Private ownership "is not only lawful, but absolutely necessary." In addition, the right to property is essential in maintaining the structure of the family. For what can pater familias use to threaten the children with if not the legacy? A worker ought to be given the opportunity to live sparingly, save money, and invest his savings for the future.
      ellauri162.html on line 705: It is important to remember that we were not created for this world, but rather for everlasting life with God. Riches should be viewed as an obstacle for eternal happiness, and that they do not bring freedom. With this in mind, associations of workers and employers ought to do what is best for the body, soul, and property of all involved.
      ellauri162.html on line 714: Aika paxua, Bernanos. Himo kauhistuttaa pappia, jota maxa vaivaa. Rippilapsosetkin vetelevät kätöseen ja angstaavat. Se on epäpuhdasta. Papin kannattaisi tulla maxapalaan.
      ellauri162.html on line 736: 1798 löste der Saalfelder Konrektor den Atheismusstreit aus, als er in Friedrich Immanuel Niethammers und Fichtes „Philosophischem Journal“ den Aufsatz „Entwickelung des Begriffs der Religion“ publizierte, den Fichte mit einem Nachwort verteidigte. Für Forberg ist Religion ein praktischer Glaube als Voraussetzung des moralischen Handelns. Dieser Glaube besteht lediglich in dem Wunsch, dass das Gute in der Welt die Oberhand erhalten möge. Die Existenz Gottes ist für Forberg, nach der Kritik Immanuel Kants an den Gottesbeweisen, weder durch Offenbarung noch durch theoretische Spekulation begründbar und daher nur im Sinne einer Vaihingerschen Als-Ob-Existenz im Dienst der Moralphilosophie anzunehmen. Theologie wird mit Religionsphilosophie gleichgesetzt.
      ellauri162.html on line 757: In a few cases, a person has made the list mainly on the basis of his or her attack on free will and morality—the foundation of the traditional religious view of human beings—so long as the person has also publicly identified as an atheist. You might say ours is a list of atheists with attitude.
      ellauri162.html on line 759: Richard Dawkins does not make the head of our list. Since this may disappoint some of our readers. we have, after our ranking, also ordered the atheists on our list by the number of Google hits that their names obtain.
      ellauri162.html on line 767: Number 4 Freudin Square, Iraq war veteran is Black. In his rap songs, he boasts about desecrating Brigham Young’s grave and urinating in a synagogue. Be there or be Square!
      ellauri162.html on line 772: No. 6 James (“The Amazing”) Randi (b. 1928) Born in Canada, Randi has had a long career as a stage magician, TV personality, and prolific author. However, the most distinctive feature of his career has been “debunking”—showing how his own and others’ magic tricks are done. Most recently, he has become an outspoken atheist and critic of religion.
      ellauri162.html on line 774: No. 7 Polly Toynbee has been a columnist for London’s The Guardian newspaper since 1998 and President of the British Humanist Association since 2007. Granddaughter of the famous historian, Arnold J. Toynbee, she stood for MP, unsuccessfully, in 1983 as a Social Democratic Party candidate. Wasnt good enough for even that. But then, the purpose of life is not to be happy, as such.
      ellauri162.html on line 775: In 2011, she agreed to debate Christian apologist William Lane Craig, but later pulled out, saying “I hadn’t realised the nature of Mr. Lane Craig’s debating style, and having now looked at his previous performances, this is not my kind of forum.” Chickened out, that´s all.
      ellauri162.html on line 781: William Lane Craig (born August 23, 1949) is an American analytic philosopher, Christian theologian, Christian apologist, and author. He is Professor of Philosophy at Houston Baptist University and Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology (Biolan University). Craig has updated and defended the Kalam cosmological argument for the existence of God. He has also published work where he argues in favor of the historical plausibility of the resurrection of Jesus. His study of divine aseity and Platonism culminated with his book God Over All. He is a Wesleyan theologian who upholds the view of Molinism and neo-Apollinarianism.
      ellauri162.html on line 783: Aseity (from Latin ā "from" and sē "self", plus -ity) is the property by which a being exists of and from itself. It refers to the Christian belief that God does not depend on any cause other than himself for his existence, realization, or end, and has within himself his own reason of existence. This represents God as absolutely independent and self-existent by nature. Bernanosin ateistipappi ei välittänyt aseptiikasta, sepsis tuli.
      ellauri162.html on line 798: Pharyngula is a term used by evolutionists to describe a hypothetical phylotypic stage of development in embryology. It is mistakenly thought by most evolutionists that this stage represents the basic vertebrate body plan in the common ancestor of all vertebrates. There is currently a dispute among scientists as to how similar embryos are and to the reality of this stage.
      ellauri162.html on line 800: There are six stages to embryonic development, and the pharyngula stage is towards the middle. In the early stages of development there is significant diversity in the morphology of embryos, this diversity decreases over time till the pharyngula stage where they are most similar (often difficult for anyone but trained embryologist to differentiate), and finally in the last stages of development morphology diversifies again. It is hypothesized that the reason the pharyngula stage is so morphologically constrained is that this is the point where sequential activation of hox genes is initiated so any strong deviations from the developmental plan would lead to drastic changes in the final phenotype of the organism.
      ellauri162.html on line 802: All the major structures of the vertebrate are developed by this period. This includes:
      ellauri162.html on line 814: The concept of a highly conserved ontogeny dates back to 1828 and the work by Karl von Baer. Baer´s work was cited by Charles Darwin and used in support of his Theory of Evolution. The concept was made famous though by Ernst Haeckel in 1874 with the publication of his drawings of the conserved stage. Haeckel was mainly pushing the concept of recapitulation in which he hypothesized that ontological development repeated the evolutionary steps of the organism. Recapitulation has since been discredited and is not accepted by any modern biologist. Haeckel has been accused of falsifying his embryonic drawings, most notably by Jonathan Wells in his book Icons of Evolution. Some biology text books used Haeckel´s drawings for many years after it was known they were faked. However, most modern biology textbooks only use them now for historical reference and actual photos of embryos are used to discuss the pharyngula stage.
      ellauri162.html on line 820: More importantly, Pharyngula can also refer to a blog written and posted by P.Z. Myers. See Pharyngula (blog). Pharyngula is a blog by atheist and evolutionist PZ Myers, who is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris. Pharyngula was hosted 2005-2011 at Scienceblogs in full, and 2011-present, in part. Since 2011, Pharyngula has been hosted at Freethought Blogs. The atheist biologist Massimo Pigliucci said of Myers and his blog audience, "one cannot conclude this parade without mentioning P.Z. Myers, who has risen to fame because of a blog where the level of nastiness (both by the host and by his readers) is rarely matched anywhere else on the Internet...".
      ellauri162.html on line 824: A somewhat similar report was made concerning the audience of Richard Dawkins´s web community. In February of 2010, the news organization The Telegraph reported that the atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins was embroiled "in a bitter online battle over plans to rid his popular internet forum for atheists of foul language, insults and 'frivolous gossip'." In addition, Richard Dawkins has a reputation for being abrasive.
      ellauri162.html on line 830: Robin McLaurin Williams (July 21, 1951 – August 11, 2014) was an American actor and comedian. Williams was raised and sometimes identified himself as an Episcopalian. He described his denomination in a comedy routine as "I have that idea of Chicago protestant, Episcopal—Catholic light: half the religion, half the guilt." He also described himself as an "honorary Jew", and on Israel's 60th Independence Day in 2008, he appeared in Times Square, along with several other celebrities to wish Israel a happy birthday.
      ellauri162.html on line 831: Williams was found dead in his home in Paradise Cay, California on August 11, 2014. The final autopsy report, released in November 2014, concluded that Williams' death was a suicide resulting from "asphyxia due to hanging". Sen päästä löytyi israelilaisia levyn kappaleita. President Barack Obama released a statement upon Williams's death: Robin Williams was an airman, a doctor, a genie, a nanny, a president, a professor, a bangarang Peter Pan, and everything in between. Se oli Jönsyäkin nuorempi, ja on nyt jo varmaan ihan homeessa.
      ellauri163.html on line 48: He wrote the drama Got fun nekome (God of Vengeance) in the winter of 1906 in Cologne, Germany. It is about a Jewish brothel owner who attempts to become respectable by commissioning a Torah scroll and marrying off his daughter to a yeshiva student. Set in a brothel, the play includes Jewish prostitutes and a lesbian scene. I. L. Peretz famously said of the play after reading it: "Burn it, Asch, burn it!" Instead, Asch went to Berlin to pitch it to director Max Reinhardt and actor Rudolph Schildkraut, who produced it at the Deutsches Theater. God of Vengeance opened on March 19, 1907 and ran for six months, and soon was translated and performed in a dozen European languages. It was first brought to New York by David Kessler in 1907. The audience mostly came for Kessler, and they booed the rest of the cast. The New York production sparked a major press war between local Yiddish papers, led by the Orthodox Tageplatt and even the secular Forverts. Orthodox papers referred to God of Vengeance as "filthy," "immoral," and "indecent," while radical papers described it as "moral," "artistic," and "beautiful". Some of the more provocative scenes in the production were changed, but it wasn't enough for the Orthodox papers. Even Yiddish intellectuals and the play's supporters had problems with the play's inauthentic portrayal of Jewish tradition, especially Yankl's use of the Torah, which they said Asch seemed to be using mostly for cheap effects; they also expressed concern over how it might stigmatize Jewish people who already faced much anti-Semitism. The association with Jews and sex work was a popular stereotype at the time. Other intellectuals criticized the writing itself, claiming that the second act was beautifully written but the first and third acts failed to support it.
      ellauri163.html on line 50: God of Vengeance was published in English-language translation in 1918. In 1922, it was staged in New York City at the Provincetown Theatre in Greenwich Village, and moved to the Apollo Theatre on Broadway on February 19, 1923, with a cast that included the acclaimed Jewish immigrant actor Rudolph Schildkraut. Its run was cut short on March 6, when the entire cast, producer Harry Weinberger, and one of the owners of the theater were indicted for violating the state's Penal Code, and later convicted on charges of obscenity. Weinberger, who was also a prominent attorney, represented the group at the trial. The chief witness against the play was Rabbi Joseph Silberman, who declared in an interview with Forverts: "This play libels the Jewish religion. Even the greatest anti-Semite could not have written such a thing". (You just wait for Philip Roth...) After a protracted battle, the conviction was successfully appealed. In Europe, the play was popular enough to be translated into German, Russian, Polish, Hebrew, Italian, Czech, Romanian and Norwegian. Indecent, the 2015 play written by Paula Vogel, tells of those events and the impact of God of Vengeance. It opened on Broadway at the Cort Theater in April 2017, directed by Rebecca Taichman. Eli ei Asch ihan pasé vielä ole.
      ellauri163.html on line 55: Viereeni tuolille olin sijoittanut filosofian historian ja joukon muita kirjoja joiden avulla voisin saada häiriintyneen henkeni järjestyxeen. Olin lainannut Breslerin kirjastosta Tolstoin moraaliset novellit ja esseet, Spinozan Etiikan, Kantin Käytännöllisen järjen kritiikin, Schopenhauerin Maailman tahtona ja ajatuksena, Nietzschen teoksen Näin puhui Zarathustra ja pasifisti Forsterin teoksen (jonka nimeä en muista, oisko ollut Maurice?), Payot'n Tahdon kasvattamisen ja useita teoksia hypnoosista, itsesuggestiosta (Coué, Charles Baudoin), ja ties mitä muuta kaikki teoksia jotka sivusivat olennaista. Peräti ostanut olin Rabbi Moshe Haim Luzzatton kirjan Oikeamielisen vaellus ja viidennen Mooseksen kirjan, joka oli mielestäni viisain teos mitä ihminen on koskaan kirjoittanut.
      ellauri163.html on line 132: Omistusjuttuja. Täähän on se kaikkein tärkein normisto, eli omaisuudensuoja. Kerjäläisiä ei saa olla, mutta köyhistä ei ole mitään kieltoa. Niitä pitää sietää. Oman tiimin velkojen maximikesto on 6v. Korkoa ei saisi omilta porukoilta ottaa, mutta tää sääntö kyllä unohtui aika äkkiä. Orjan voi kiinnittää naskalilla seinään.
      ellauri163.html on line 146: Hölmöjä lakeja. Vaimon ei pidä miehen asetta kantaman, eikä myös miehen pukeman ylensä vaimon vaatteita, sillä jokainen, joka sen ekee, on herralle sun jumalalles kauhistus. Sanoo herra joka nähdään useimmiten yöpaidassa. Älä kynnä härjällä ja aasilla. Älä pue ylles villa-pellavasekotteita. Laita paituliin neljään kulmaan rihmoja, ne on jumalasta söpöjä. Törkeitä neizyyspykäliä. Avionrikkojat on molemmat tapettava. Ennen papin aamenta bylsitty kihlattu listitään kaupunkioloissa, koska se ei huutanut, maalla se pääsee varoituxella, jos ei ollut ketään kuulolla. Kaikissa muissa tapauxissa sakotetaan siikliperunoilla. Mutta TÄRKEÄÄ: kenenkään ei pidä ottaman isän emäntää (Niin Ruuben!) eikä myös paljastamaan isänsä peitettä (kuulitko Haam!)
      ellauri163.html on line 150: Ulkona olkaan sulla paikka, johonkas menet tarpeilles. Ja sinulla pitää oleman vähä kalikka vyölläs, ja kun menet tarpeilles, kaiva sillä ja istuttuas peitä saastaisuutes. Ei se kepakko kai ollut kiinalainen vessapaperi, vaan pikemminkin kenttälapio. Porttoja ei pidä oleman Israelin tyttärissä, eikä yhtään huorintekijää pojissa. Failing that, älä kuitenkaan tuo porton palkkaa äläkä koiran hintaa papille, se on kauhistus. Sano vaikka että se on jotain muuta. Koronkiskonta on sallittua goyimeilta, muttei tiimiläisiltä. Jumala haluaa maxut ajoissa, muttei sille ole pakko mitään luvata. Toisen pellosta saa syödä muttei laittaa muovipussiin ruokaa noutopöydästä. Onkohan Päivi Räsäsellä vyöllä lain vaatima vähä kalikka?
      ellauri163.html on line 183: 1Reuben was denied this privileged position, because he had dishonoured his father by having sex with his father's concubine.
      ellauri163.html on line 187: Mut mihis on sana siilo tästä hävinnyt?
      ellauri163.html on line 189: The scepter shall not depart from Judah, Nor the ruler's staff from between his feet, Until Shiloh comes, And to him shall be the obedience of the peoples.
      ellauri163.html on line 193: Viiniköynnökseen hän sitoo aasinsa, jaloon köynnökseen aasinsa varsan. Hän pesee viinissä vaatteensa, rypäleiden veressä pukunsa. Hänen silmissään on viinin hehku, hänen hampaissaan maidon valkeus. Sebulon on asuva meren äärellä, hän asettuu rannikolle, missä laivat kulkevat, hänen selkänsä taa jää Sidon. Isaskar on vahvaluinen juhta, joka makaa kuormaansa odottaen. Hän näki asuinsijansa hyväksi ja maansa ihanaksi. Hän painoi olkansa taakan alle, kävi tekemään orjan töitä. Dan on ajava kansansa asiaa yhtenä Israelin heimoista. Dan on oleva käärmeenä tiellä, polulla kyynä, joka puree hevosta vuohiseen, niin että ratsastaja suistuu maahan. Herra, sinulta minä odotan pelastusta! Gadia ahdistavat rosvojen joukot, ja Gad ahdistaa niitä, seuraa niiden kintereillä. Asserin leipä on runsas, hän tarjoaa kuninkaiden herkkuja. Naftali on vapaana juokseva kauris, kauniita ovat hänen vasansa. Joosef on hedelmäpuu, nuori hedelmäpuu lähteen äärellä, sen oksat ojentuvat yli muurin. Jousimiehet hätyyttävät häntä, he ampuvat ja ahdistavat häntä, mutta hänen jousensa pysyy jäntevänä ja hänen kätensä ovat nopeat. Tämän saa aikaan Jaakobin Väkevä, hän, jonka nimi on Paimen, Israelin Kallio, isäsi Jumala, joka on auttava sinua, Kaikkivaltias, joka siunaa sinua, antaa siunauksia ylhäältä taivaasta
      ellauri163.html on line 197: Sitten Jaakob antoi heille nämä ohjeet: »Minut otetaan pian esi-isieni luo. Haudatkaa minut isieni viereen siihen luolaan, joka on heettiläisen Efronin vainiolla, Makpelan vainiolla, Mamren lähistöllä Kanaaninmaassa. Sen vainion Abraham osti heettiläiseltä Efronilta sukuhaudaksi.
      ellauri163.html on line 231: Ensimmäinen maininta Shilohista, joka sijaitsee pohjoiseen Bethelistä ja etelään Lebonahista löytyy Joosuan kirjasta. Se on tää, että israelilaiset jakaa alueisiin ne jotka ovat pystyneet valloittamaan ja miehittään, jonka jälkeen Siilosta on myös osoitettu turvakaupungit ja leeviläisten kaupungit. Tästä paikasta tulee tärkein palvonnan ja hallinnon paikka, jossa Israelin pojat kokoontuvat vuosittaisiin juhliin tuomareiden aikana.
      ellauri163.html on line 233: Liitonarkku pantiin siellä pystyyn 369. vuosi talmudilaisen lähteistä päätellen (babylonialainen Talmud Zevachim 118B). Tabernaakkeli lähti Silohista Eelin kuoleman jälkeen. Ainakin yxi miinuspiste hänen oleskelunsa aikana: tabernaakkeli korvataan temppelin edeltäjällä (1.Samuelin kirja 3:15) tai sijoitetaan rakennukseen.
      ellauri163.html on line 235: Eli Eli opastaa Samuelia Silohissa. Jälkimmäinen profetoi ja palvelee majassa, mutta ei leeviläisenä, koska hän ei ole Aaronin jälkeläinen. (Eli siis mitä?)
      ellauri163.html on line 247: The name 'Shiloh' means 'the Bearer of Rest'. 'Shiloh' does not refer to a city or a group. 'Shiloh' is the name of the coming Messiah - the promised Seed, through Whom all the families of the earth would be blessed - the One Who brings rest for the soul and is the fulfilment of all Scripture - Jesus the Messiah - the son of David - the son of Abraham - the father of Isaac - the father of Jacob - the father of Judah and his brother.
      ellauri163.html on line 253: This is the genealogy[a] of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham:
      ellauri163.html on line 259: Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,
      ellauri163.html on line 308: and Josiah the father of Jeconiah and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.
      ellauri163.html on line 341: Shiloh is generally understood as denoting the Messiah, "the peaceful one," as the word signifies ( Genesis 49:10 ). The Vulgate Version translates the word, "he who is to be sent," in allusion to the Messiah; the Revised Version, margin, "till he come to Shiloh;" and the LXX., "until that which is his shall come to Shiloh." It is most simple and natural to render the expression, as in the Authorized Version, "till Shiloh come," interpreting it as a proper name (Compare Isaiah 9:6 ).
      ellauri163.html on line 347: Guest Aug 12 ´06#1: What does this verse mean?
      ellauri163.html on line 352: Nor the ruler´s staff from between his feet;
      ellauri163.html on line 354: And the homage of peoples be his.
      ellauri163.html on line 358: And why does King Jimmy say "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be."
      ellauri163.html on line 360: The reason I ask this question is that it seems
      ellauri163.html on line 361: to imply a king of the line of Judah forever, but Israel currently has no king, nor do our democratic rulers have staffs. Does this imply that "he has come to Shiloh" (JPS) or that "Shiloh has come" (KJV)? Please explain. Why does King Jimmy think the homage of the people will be Shiloh's whereas JPS says it is Judah's? Who or what is this Shiloh and why is he/it so important that the scepter will not depart from Judah till then?
      ellauri163.html on line 366: 49:10'The scepter will not depart from Judah, nor legislation from his descendants. Nations will submit to him until the final tranquility comes.
      ellauri163.html on line 369: 10The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the student of the law from between his feet, until Shiloh comes, and to him will be a gathering of peoples.
      ellauri163.html on line 371: G-d did not always promise that there would always be a king (let alone a king from the tribe of Judah). In Genesis 49 Jacob is blessing the tribes and says the scepter will not depart the tribe of Judah. This is long before Moses, let alone the first Temple -- not to mention the hundreds of years then before the second Temple.
      ellauri163.html on line 380: "The scepter shall not depart Judah" means that the right to kingship will forever belong to the tribe of Judah. This is re-enforced in Prophets when first David and then his son, Solomon, are told that they are the rightful bloodline for the throne. Others have sat on the throne but they were not rightful heirs.
      ellauri163.html on line 382: For those Xians who say that there has been no king of Judah since J-sus they should check their math. In fact there has been no ruler from the tribe of Judah since 586 B.C.E That is right: 600 years prior to his supposed messiah. Guess he just proved to himself that J-sus was inelligible.
      ellauri163.html on line 385: BTW from Genesis 49 when Jacob makes this statement there were 400 years of slavery in Egypt, a few more hundred years when we had the Judges and the Phillistines before we had ANY king from the line of Judah sitting on a throne.
      ellauri163.html on line 391: Jacob was fortelling the fate of his sons and their heirs. He stated that the throne would belong to the tribe of Judah "until Shiloh comes." Belonging to isn't the same as saying there will be an unbroken line of RULING kings until Shiloh comes.
      ellauri163.html on line 396: Specifically, regarding the Hebrew term - shiloh (this term also appears spelled as - shilo in 11 of the 33 total instances in the Hebrew Bible), most of the ancient and modern explanations of this verse turn upon the Hebrew word itself.
      ellauri163.html on line 398: The older Jewish versions and commentators (e.g., Septuagint, Targums, Saadyah, and RASHI) read this word without the letter - yod, as if written - sheloh, the archaic form for - shelo, his; or, as if it were a poetic form for - shalvah, peace. (Sama sana varmaan kuin ähläm sähläm, tai shaloom.)
      ellauri163.html on line 400: One translation, "until that which is his shall come.", is derived from the Septuagint. Its meaning is: 'The scepter shall not depart from Judah till all that is reserved for him shall have been fulfilled.' Another translation, "Till he come whose it (the kingdom) is.", is based on the Onkelos and Jerusalem Targums, Saadya Ga´on, RASHI, and other Jewish commentators. A modern Jewish commentator, M. Friedlander, renders this as "Till peace cometh.".
      ellauri163.html on line 402: All of the Jewish translations (and commentaries) deal with a future time, the messianic era, during which there will be a king, a direct descendant from King David, sitting on the Davidic throne. The closing phrase of the blessing given to Judah defines the role of the expected future Jewish king, Messiah, in the world. Ultimately, his job will be to gather the nations under the banner of the One G-d of peace. If a gathering of the nations for the sake of peace is the first explicit description of the messianic era, it clearly suggests something that is natural, recognizable, and human.
      ellauri163.html on line 450: Hauta-arkku on vieläkin nähtävänä ammonilaisten pääkaupungissa Ammanissa.. Tämä tarkoittaa, että Ogin kuolemasta on jo kulunut melkoisesti aikaa ja hauta-arkusta on tullut historiallinen nähtävyys. Mooseksen hauta koostui maanpäällisestä hautakappelista, ja siinä oli kuiluja, jotka johtivat maanalaisiin hautakammioihin. Hautakappelilla oli piha, jonka länsipuolella oli neljä pienempää kappelia. Kompleksin seinät on koristeltu upotetulla helpotuksella, ja Mooses on esillä eri jumalien edessä, mutta myös alamaailmassa.
      ellauri163.html on line 482: They believe that Jesus survived the crucifixion almost 2,000 Easters ago, and went to live out his days in Kashmir. And for those who scoff, remember that others have argued, just as implausibly, that Jesus came to Britain. A theory that was much in vogue when the poet William Blake famously asked: "And did those feet in ancient time, walk upon England's mountains green? And was the holy Lamb of God on England's pleasant pastures seen?"
      ellauri163.html on line 497: Palikka tajuaisit ettei raamatun kirjoituksilla ole todistusarvoa, ennenkuin löydetään selviä yhteneväisyyksiä historiasta. Niitä kun ei ole näkynyt, niin on turha puhua myöskään ylösnousemuksista. Annan esimerkin:
      ellauri163.html on line 622: No. 36 ateistilistalla, Philip Pullman (1946) syntyi Norwichissa, Isossa-Britanniassa ja suoritti kolmannen luokan englannin tutkinnon Oxfordin yliopistossa. Hän työskenteli keskiasteen opettajana kirjoittaessaan lastenkirjoja – jo yli 30-vuotiaana – jotka tekisivät hänen maineestaan tunnetun. Hän saavutti kuitenkin todelliset julkkikset vasta julkaisemalla myydyimmän trilogiansa Hänen tummat kankaansa vuosina 1994–2001. Trilogia perustuu löyhästi Miltonin kadonneeseen Paratiisiin – paitsi että saatanahahmo on sankari, kun taas Jumala on roisto (no niinhän se vähän oli Miltonillakin). Ateistit ovat ylistäneet sitä vastalääkkeenä C.S. Lewisin Narnia-sarjalle, jonka Pullman on tuominnut uskonnolliseksi propagandaksi. Hän on suorapuheinen ateistien puolesta Isossa-Britanniassa. Hetkinen, kekä saatanahahmo? Sankarihan on Lyra, josta tulee Eeva kakkoineen? Sekö on se saatana? Ja paha jumalakin on vaan tollanen vanha statisti, niikö Paavi Wojtylä, jota pidettiin paavimobiilissa pystyssä kepillä.
      ellauri163.html on line 660: John Perry on Willin isä. Hän on tutkimusmatkailija maailmastamme, joka löysi portaalin Lyran maailmaan ja josta tuli shamaani, joka tunnetaan nimellä Stanislaus Grumman tai Jopari, hänen alkuperäisen nimensä korruptio. John Richard Perry (born 1943) is Henry Waldgrave Stuart Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at Stanford University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of California, Riverside. He has made significant contributions to philosophy in the fields of philosophy of language, metaphysics, and philosophy of mind. He is known primarily for his work on situation semantics (together with Jon Barwise), reflexivity, indexicality, personal identity, and self-knowledge. Situation Semantics was a huge flop, which became obvious when Barwise died of the cancer of the colon.
      ellauri163.html on line 697: With an 11-year-old hero, Philip Pullman´s new book is a delightful nod to Edmund Spenser´s 'The Faerie Queene'. If Philip Pullman’s Dark Materials trilogy was an obvious nod to John Milton’s Paradise Lost, his new Book Of Dust trilogy takes inspiration from Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene. Though thematically different, both fall within the same literary genre—they are epic poems, long narrative pieces recounting heroic deeds, and if the term could loosely be used to describe works of prose, then La Belle Sauvage, the first in the Book Of Dust trilogy, is one such novel. Spenser’s late-16th century poem, though incomplete, follows the adventures of medieval knights. Our knight is 11-year-old Malcolm Polstead, curious, intelligent, good-natured and clueless, when we first meet him, of the trials that await him. La Belle Sauvage, then, is a companion, or "equel" (a new story that stands alongside his previous trilogy), to His Dark Materials trilogy. Better strike while the iron is hot, as J.K. Rowling did.
      ellauri163.html on line 723: Day wrote concerning atheist PZ Myers´ blog audience: “It´s by no means a scientific test, but it is interesting to note the coincidence that 59 of the virulent atheists over at Dr. PZ Myers place report an average score on the Asperger´s Quotient test of 27.8. And this does not include the two individuals who actually have Asperger´s but did not report any test results.
      ellauri163.html on line 727: “ Basically the range for possible answers is 0 to 50. The information below shows you the different ranges as recorded from others sitting this same AQ quiz over the years.
      ellauri163.html on line 735: 26-31 gives a borderline indication of an autism spectrum disorder. It is also possible to have aspergers or mild autism within this range.
      ellauri163.html on line 744: PZ Myers is a New Atheist and New Atheism is a contemporary form of antitheism. Therefore, it is very probable his blog appeals to people who hold to a antitheism perspective. Social science research indicates that antitheists score the highest among atheists when it comes to personality traits such as narcissism, dogmatism, and anger. Furthermore, they scored lowest when it comes to agreeableness and positive relations with others.
      ellauri163.html on line 748: People with higher scores on the Autism Spectrum Quotient (items included "I am fascinated by numbers," and "I find social situations difficult") had weaker belief in a personal God than those with lower IQ score ("I am fascinated by skirts", and "I find zippers difficult"). Second, reduced ability to mentalize mediated this correlation. (Mentalizing was measured with the Empathy Quotient, which assesses self-reported ability to recognize and react to others' emotions, and with a task that requires identifying what's being expressed in pictures of eyes. Systematizing -- interest in and aptitude for mechanical and abstract systems -- was correlated with autism but was not a mediator.) Third, men were much less likely than women to say they strongly believed in a personal God (even controlling for autism), and this correlation was also mediated by reduced mentalizing. They were also clearly more interested in skirts and puzzled by zippers.
      ellauri163.html on line 750: Another study found that the higher the autism score, the less likely the person was to believe in God, with the link partially explained by theory of mind. In other words, the better someone felt at understanding other minds, the more fervent their belief in God, who reads everybody´s mind. (Sometimes I wonder what kind of mind God must have, when s/he has to simultaneously concentrate on several gigamonkeys worth of personal requests. I bet s/he is fascinated by numbers. S/He never says "all our service representatives are busy at this moment, please hold without hanging up the phone.")
      ellauri163.html on line 756: Dr. Mark Goulston, M.D. wrote in his article Just Listen - Don´t Confuse a Narcissist with Asperger´s Syndrome: “Both narcissists and high functioning people with Asperger like features are goal minded to a fault, and both can view other people more as functions or vehicles to achieve that goal instead of as people with feelings. However a critical difference between the two is that a narcissist doesn´t care if they hurt you or your feelings (and the truly malignant ones may even take delight in doing so), whereas someone with Asperger´s like features would prefer not to.
      ellauri163.html on line 770: Bernadotten maalaispappi on kaikin puolin ns ikävä ihminen. Nöyrän ulkokuoren alla se on vittumainen huumoriton besserwisseri. Kuvittelen sen Dos Vidasin Tirson näköisexi, samanlainen luisevan lommoposkinen nahistunut kyrvänpää. Bernadotte ei nähtävästi tykkää siitäkään, ei se tykkää yhtään kenestäkään.
      ellauri163.html on line 817: That said, the reason the film does succeed, and rises to greatness, rests primarily on the shoulders of the lead actress, Nadine Nortier, who, despite little dialogue, conveys great depths within her character, despite being a non-professional actress at the time. On the other hand, Jean-Claude Guilbert (a professional actor who also appeared in Au Hasard Balthazar, as another drunkard, Arnold) is also very good. The rest of the cast is solid. Yet, critical missteps abound, especially when some claim Mouchette is filled with anger. Yes, there may be acts of seeming anger (tossing dirt at her female rivals), but clearly the character of Mouchette is a walking mass of desensitisation. This would explain why she reacts the way she does to sex with Arsene, rather than seeing it as her ‘striking back’ at the world.
      ellauri163.html on line 821: Ghislain Cloquetin elokuva ei ole näyttävä, mutta sitten sen ei tarvitse olla. Sillä on kuitenkin yksinkertainen ulkonäkö ja tuntuma vuosikymmeniä aikaisemmin kuvatun elokuvan kanssa, ja tätä elokuvaa verrataan vain Jean-Pierre Melvillen Le Samourain kaltaiseen elokuvaan, joka on samana vuonna tehty värielokuva, saadakseen käsityksen siitä, kuinka ainutlaatuinen Bressonin visio oli. Sama pätee elokuvan taustahälyn pisteyttämiseen, jossa on vähän musiikkia, joka ei ole diegeettistä (johdattelevaa). Koska elokuva nousee ja putoaa tarinansa ja suorituskykynsä mukana, teknisten näkökohtien on vain oltava vakaita, ja ne ovat.
      ellauri163.html on line 829: There is also a scene where Mouchette is wet, working in the bar, and then gets some coins as payment. Later, in his hut, she is wet, and Arsene pays her some coins to go along with his story regarding Mathieu’s presumed death. What this does is not only link divergent scenes in a strictly visual and cinematic way, but it emphasises the elliptical and cyclical nature of the film, where recurring images and motifs abound. Yet, all of them are slightly askew, and the camera always seems to look at its lead character’s life slightly askance, as if it was somehow recapitulating the clearly warped view of life Mouchette owns.
      ellauri163.html on line 833: In essence, the film called Mouchette recapitulates the point of view of its character Mouchette, which allows the viewer to both ‘feel’ a bit of the character’s warp, while also being able to step back and intellectually distance oneself and ‘understand’ the character’s warp. Whether or not Bresson intended this doubled perspective on life, it, and many of the film’s other strengths more than make up for its weak ending, and lift it to a greatness that, while it falls short of the utmost in the canon of great cinema, nonetheless makes Mouchette a film for which the term “great” is applied a surety. There are, certainly, worse ways to misfire, slightly or otherwise.
      ellauri163.html on line 862: David Émile Durkheim was born 15 April 1858 in Épinal, Lorraine, France, to Mélanie (Isidor) and Moïse Durkheim, coming into a long lineage of devout French Jews. As his father, grandfather, and great-grandfather had all been rabbis, young Durkheim began his education in a rabbinical school. However, at an early age, he switched schools, deciding not to follow in his family's footsteps. I bet dad, grandad and greatgranddad were all very disappointed. In fact, Durkheim led a completely secular life, whereby much of his work was dedicated to demonstrating that religious phenomena stemmed from social rather than divine factors. Despite this fact, Durkheim did not sever ties with his family or with the Jewish community. Actually, many of his most prominent collaborators and students were Jewish, some even blood-related.
      ellauri163.html on line 864: A precocious student, Durkheim entered the École Normale Supérieure (ENS) in 1879, at his third attempt. The entering class that year was one of the most brilliant of the nineteenth century, as many of his classmates, such as Jean Jaurès and Henri Bergson, went on to become major figures in France's intellectual history as well. At the ENS, Durkheim studied under the direction of Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges, a classicist with a social-scientific outlook, and wrote his Latin dissertation on Montesquieu. At the same time, he read Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer, whereby Durkheim became interested in a scientific approach to society very early on in his career. The writer of this exposition likes the word whereby.
      ellauri163.html on line 873: In the last presentation we looked at Durkheim’s ideas on the weakening of the collective conscience through modernity—the division of labor, weakening of primary groups and general social change. As we saw, this left the individual without much moral guidance. As Durkheim was concerned with moral behavior and social justice he naturally turned to the study of religion.
      ellauri163.html on line 879: The believer who has communicated with his god is not merely a man who sees new truths of which the unbeliever is ignorant; he is a man who is stronger. He feels within him more force, wither to endure the trials of existence, or to conquer them (1954, p. 416).
      ellauri163.html on line 883: Now this moral remaking cannot be achieved except by the means of reunions, assemblies, and meetings where the individuals, being closely united to one another, reaffirm in common their common sentiments; hence come ceremonies which do not differ from regular religious ceremonies, either in their object, the results which they produce, or the processes employed to attain these results.
      ellauri163.html on line 891: The great things of the past which filled our fathers with enthusiasm do not excite the same ardor in us...In a word, the old gods are growing old or already dead, and others are not yet born...But this state of incertitude and confused agitation cannot last forever. A day will come when our societies will know again those hours of creative effervescence, in the course of which new formulae are found which serve for a while as a guide to humanity; and when these hours shall have been passed through once, men will spontaneously feel the need of reliving them from time to time in thought, that is to say, of keeping alive their memory by means of celebrations which regularly reproduce their fruits. We have already seen how the French Revolution established a whole cycle of holidays to keep the principles with which it was inspired in a state of perpetual youth.
      ellauri163.html on line 903: Yhteiskunta kohdistaa Durkheimin mukaan jäseniinsä ehdottoman tottelevaisuuden vaatimuksen, ja tämä heijastuu ihmisten käsityksenä pyhistä asioista sekä jumalasta, joka koetaan pyhäksi asettamisen vaatimuksen lähteeksi. Alkukantaisissa yhteiskunnissa tämä tunne yhteisön vaatimuksesta ehdottomaan kuuliaisuuteen on Durkheimin mukaan hyvin voimakas. Heimon käsityksillä ja tavoilla on ehdoton valta yli yksilöiden. Myös kehittyneissä yhteiskunnissa tämä alkukantainen ykseyden tuntu palaa osittain henkiin esimerkiksi sodan aikana, jolloin tunne kansallisesta yhteenkuuluvuudesta saa yksilöihin lähes rajattoman vaikutusvallan.
      ellauri163.html on line 984: Vapautta ei voi olla mahdottoman ja olemattoman kunnioitus, ellei ymmärrä ajan olemusta ihmiselle. Tunne vapaudesta on sisäinen (tästä Schiskinin kuvaus Sartren vankilapapista, jota vanki soimaa tulosta häntä pilkkaamaan, kun sanoo, että vanki on vankilassa, mutta sisäisesti vapaa). Oisko tää nyt ymmärrettävä niin, että menen taivaaseen vaikka teurastamon sika-autossa, jos sillä pääsen tästä valitettavasta aikapulasta. Ken vaivojansa vaikertaa on vaivojensa vanki, oli äiti Pirkolla tapana sanoa, jos sille jotain valitti.
      ellauri164.html on line 41: A survey published in American Psychologist in 1991 ranked Wundt's reputation as first for "all-time eminence" based on ratings provided by 29 American historians of psychology. William James and Sigmund Freud were ranked a distant second and third.
      ellauri164.html on line 43: In the introduction to his Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie in 1874, Wundt described Immanuel Cunt and Johann Friedrich Herbart as the philosophers who had the most influence on the formation of his own views. Those who follow up these references will find that Wundt critically took to the cleaners both these thinkers’ ideas. He distanced himself from Herbart's science of the soul . Wundt praised Cunt's rejection of a "rational" psychology deduced from metaphysics, but he argued against Cunt's epistemology as well as Cunt's category theory and his flabby position on teleological explanations in his publication Was soll uns Kant nicht verkaufen? (1892).
      ellauri164.html on line 53: Juopon maxavaivaisen pikkupapin pikkupillu bändäri Serafita näkee siitä unia. Sen yhden paikan ympärillä pyörii kaikki mystikot, puolukoina pillussa. Mä alan huomata loppumetreillä et tää maalaispappi on wannabe samanlainen kaikkiruokainen pikku narsisti kuin Teoreeman Terence Postimerkki, joka tietystikään ei ole kukaan muu kuin Pieru-Pauli ize. Kaikki naiset ja puolet miehistä on siihen muka lääpällään. Hei täähän onkin vastaavasti Bernadotten märkä uni. Väkeviä motareita ja pitkätukkaisia nuoria miehiä, alaikäisiä tyttöjä joiden mustelmaiset pohkeet vilkkuvat.
      ellauri164.html on line 60: Tässä draamassa Claudel maalasi perinteisen yhteiskunnan romahtamisen monarkiasta. Kaksi aristokraattia, mies ja nainen, jotka selvisivät terrorin verilöylyistä, yrittävät henkensä, rakkautensa ja kunniansa uhalla pelastaa paavin: jälkimmäinen on kidnapattu vankilasta, jossa keisari oli pudottanut hänet ja piiloutunut heidän alueelleen. Mutta imperiumin prefekti on paljastanut läsnäolonsa ja harjoittaa vastenmielistä kiristystä. Tunteiden ja tilanteiden väkivalta antaa voimakkaan dramaattisen voiman tälle eturistiriitalle ja intohimoille, jotka syntyvät kaatuneen aristokratian ja historian muunnelmien alaisen vallan välillä. "Kuinka olisin voinut olla niin julma?" kysyi tämän "saagan" ensimmäisen osan kirjoittaja, jossa se herää laajoilla aivohalvauksilla, ranskalaisen yhteiskunnan yksittäisten kohtaloiden, kyynelten ja mullistuksia pidemmälle 1400-luvulla, mikä edeltää nykyajan tuloa.
      ellauri164.html on line 86: Et c’est encore la vie ! — Si la damnation est éternelle ! Un homme qui veut se mutiler est bien damné, n’est-ce pas ? Je me crois en enfer, donc j’y suis. C’est l’exécution du catéchisme. Je suis esclave de mon baptême. Parents, vous avez fait mon malheur et vous avez fait le vôtre. Pauvre innocent ! L’enfer ne peut attaquer les païens. — C’est la vie encore ! Plus tard, les délices de la damnation seront plus profondes. Un crime, vite, que je tombe au néant, de par la loi humaine.
      ellauri164.html on line 92: Les hallucinations sont innombrables. C’est bien ce que j’ai toujours eu : plus de foi en l’histoire, l’oubli des principes. Je m’en tairai : poëtes et visionnaires seraient jaloux. Je suis mille fois le plus riche, soyons avare comme la mer.
      ellauri164.html on line 136: Hallusinaaatioita on ziljoona. Se on varmaan se mikä mulla aina on: ei uskoa historiaan, unohdan aapistotuudet. Mä vaikenen: runoilijat ja visionäärit eivät olis kateita. Mä olen 1K kertaa rikkaampi, ollaan ahnaita kuin meri.
      ellauri164.html on line 152: - Ja ajatellaanpas vähän muakin. Tää saa mut vähän suremaan maailmaa. Mulla on mahis olla kärsimätön enää. Mun elämä oli vaan suloista hulluutta, se on valitettavaa.
      ellauri164.html on line 160: Mä kuolen vetelyyteen. Se on hauta, mä meen madoille, kauhistuxen kanahäkki! Saatana, pelleilijä, sä tahdot hajottaa mut sun sharmilla. Mä reklamoin! Mä reklamoin! Hiilihangon isku, tulipisara.
      ellauri164.html on line 218: Tämä tutkimus tutkii yhden runosarjan poikkeuksellista puoliintumisaikaa: "Westward the Course of Empire vie tiensä...". Alkaen irlantilais-anglikaanisen piispan George Berkeleyn vuonna 1726 tekemästä sävellyksestä, nämä sanat kolonisoivat valtavan osan kulttuurimaisemaa lähes kahden vuosisadan ajan. Sanomalehtipaperiin, laitureihin, valtiomiesten puheisiin, lukuaiheisiin, maantieteellisiin tietoihin, Yhdysvaltojen ensimmäiseen tieteelliseen historiaan sekä runouteen, maalauksiin, litografioihin ja valokuviin ikuistetut sanat kehittyivät vanhan maailman visiosta profeetallisista valtakunnista ilmeisen kohtalon nationalistinen iskulause. Seuraten runoa sen kiertyessä kirjallisen ja visuaalisen kulttuurin läpi, tämä projekti osoittaa, kuinka yksinkertainen lause totutti amerikkalaiset laajaan käsitykseen Yhdysvaltojen valtakunnasta siirtomaa-ajalta jälleenrakennukseen. Jatkuva varmuus valtakunnan etenemisestä länteen, itse asiassa itse imperiumin väistämättömyydestä, osoittaa kolonistien brittiläisen kulttuuriperinnön kestävän elinvoiman Amerikan vallankumouksen aattona. Yhtä tärkeitä ovat tavat, joilla amerikkalaiset muokkasivat runon ideologiaa sopimaan heidän kehittyvään kansallismielisyyteensä varhaisen tasavallan ja antebellum-aikakauden aikana. Berkeleyn sanat tarjosivat kriittisen paikan kansallismielisille tutkimuksille uuden tasavallan alkuvuosikymmeninä, mikä helpotti kansakunnan muuttumista kapitalistiseksi, hankkivaksi yhteiskunnaksi; 1800-luvun puolivälin konflikteissa he oikeuttivat amerikkalaisen sotavoimaisen imperialismin Meksikon ja Yhdysvaltojen välisessä sodassa, samalla kun he antoivat syvällistä tietoa sisällissodan alkamisesta ja sen välittömistä seurauksista, kun kansa paini Amerikan tulevaisuuden ääriviivoja vastaan. Tämä ideologia on kahden vuosisadan ajan mahdollistanut amerikkalaisten olevan sekä vakuuttuneita evankelistoja demokraattis-tasavaltalaisen hallitusmuotonsa poikkeuksellisesta luonteesta että samalla hengityksen kera omahyväisiä keisarillisen etuoikeutensa puolustajia ensin Pohjois-Amerikan mantereella ja sen alueella. alkuperäiskansojen ja lopulta maailmanlaajuisen siirtomaavaltakunnan yli. "Westward Empire" paljastaa tavat, joilla Berkeleyn runo muokkasi tätä ainutlaatuista ideologiaa, sekä tavat, joilla amerikkalaiset mukauttivat Berkeleyn runon ainutlaatuisiin olosuhteisiinsa, ja tavat, joilla tämä kehittyvä ja monikerroksinen tulkinta puolestaan muokkasi amerikkalaista ajattelua ja käyttäytymistä vuoden 1752 välillä. ja 1876. tämän ideologian ansiosta amerikkalaiset ovat voineet olla sekä vakuuttuneita evankelistoja demokraattis-tasavaltalaisen hallitusmuotonsa poikkeuksellisesta luonteesta että samalla hengityksen kera, omahyväisiä puolustajia keisarilliseen etuoikeutensa ensin Pohjois-Amerikan mantereella ja sen alkuperäisasukkailla, ja lopulta maailmanlaajuisen siirtomaavaltakunnan yli. "Westward Empire" paljastaa tavat, joilla Berkeleyn runo muokkasi tätä ainutlaatuista ideologiaa, sekä tavat, joilla amerikkalaiset mukauttivat Berkeleyn runon ainutlaatuisiin olosuhteisiinsa, ja tavat, joilla tämä kehittyvä ja monikerroksinen tulkinta puolestaan muokkasi amerikkalaista ajattelua ja käyttäytymistä vuoden 1752 välillä. ja 1876. tämän ideologian ansiosta amerikkalaiset ovat voineet olla sekä vakuuttuneita evankelistoja demokraattis-tasavaltalaisen hallitusmuotonsa poikkeuksellisesta luonteesta että samalla hengityksen kera, omahyväisiä puolustajia keisarilliseen etuoikeutensa ensin Pohjois-Amerikan mantereella ja sen alkuperäisasukkailla, ja lopulta maailmanlaajuisen siirtomaavaltakunnan yli. "Westward Empire" paljastaa tavat, joilla Berkeleyn runo muokkasi tätä ainutlaatuista ideologiaa, sekä tavat, joilla amerikkalaiset mukauttivat Berkeleyn runon ainutlaatuisiin olosuhteisiinsa, ja tavat, joilla tämä kehittyvä ja monikerroksinen tulkinta puolestaan muokkasi amerikkalaista ajattelua ja käyttäytymistä vuoden 1752 välillä. ja 1876. ensin Pohjois-Amerikan mantereen ja sen alkuperäiskansojen yli ja lopulta maailmanlaajuisen siirtomaavaltakunnan yli.
      ellauri164.html on line 223: How blue can you get? The answer is right here in my heart, wailed BB King. How stupid can you get? The answer can be found in Quora. - What is the dark side of top happiest countries? - That their taxes are so high. How can anybody be this stupid? The answer is right there in their walnut size brains.
      ellauri164.html on line 232: A pupil of William "Will to Believe" James, whose Essays in Radical Empiricism he edited (1912), Perry became one of the leaders of the New Realism movement. Perry argued for a naturalistic theory of value and a New Realist theory of perception and knowledge. He wrote a celebrated biography of William James, which won the 1936 Pulitzer Prize for Biography or Autobiography, and proceeded to a revision of his critical approach to natural knowledge. An active member among a group of American New Realist philosophers, he elaborated around 1910 the program of new realism. However, he soon dissented from moral and spiritual ontology, and turned to a philosophy of disillusionment. Perry was an advocate of a militant democracy: in his words "total but not totalitarian". Puritanism and Democracy (1944) is a famous wartime attempt to reconcile two fundamental concepts in the origins of modern America. Durkheim oli taas aivan oikeassa: sodan aikana vedetään moraalin korsetinnauhat kireälle.
      ellauri164.html on line 246: Remembering Robert M. Veatch, PhD 1939-2020. Bob Veatch from Georgetown loved genealogy and had confirmed a Veatch connection to the Stuart (Stewart among the Scots) dynasty. He was a long-time fan of bluegrass and Bob and his wife Ann were founding members of the Lucketts Bluegrass Foundation in Lucketts, Virginia, location of the world’s longest running bluegrass concert series (45 years strong!). He used to laugh and say that he thought likely he was the only undergraduate at Harvard reading Plato while listening to bluegrass. Bob was a Peace Corps volunteer in Nigeria from 1962-1964.
      ellauri164.html on line 248: Jeff Veatch is a successful entrepreneur, businessman, community leader, and philanthropist. Over the course of his career, Jeff co-founded the IT staffing services firm Apex Systems, has been recognized as the Entrepreneur of the year by Ernst and Young, selected to the Philanthropic 50 by Washington Life magazine, served on the Board of Directors for ASGN Incorporated, sits on Board of Visitors for Virginia Tech, was a founding member of the effort to bring the Olympics to Washington DC, holds Board positions with Inova Health System, as well as other leadership and board positions throughout his community. Also, as an active philanthropic investor, he formed the Veatch Charities, which focuses on education, healthcare, and his community. Mr. Veatch is a 1993 graduate of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, earning a BS in Finance.
      ellauri164.html on line 308: Pitkän ratsastusmatkan jälkeen Jeanne saapui Chinonin pikkukaupunkiin, jossa kruununprinssi Kaarle VII piti hoviaan. Prinssi ei halunnut näyttäytyä Jeannelle ja yritti hovimiehensä turvin hankkiutua ”neitsyestä” eroon. Kun Jeanne ei suostunut poistumaan hovista, hänet toimitettiin kirkonmiehistä ja professoreista koostuvan valtuuskunnan kuulusteltavaksi. Samalla huhut oudosta tytöstä levisivät, ja hänen puheensa saivat suuren kannatuksen. Jeannen julistus ”ei ole olemassa muuta apua kuin minun kauttani!” otettiin vakavasti, ja hänelle päätettiin antaa lyhyt sotilaallinen peruskoulutus. Eteen vie! Taaxe psstu! Kaze oikeaan pn! Ojennus! Hommio! Komppanii! Riviin järjesty! Housujen ja muiden varusteiden ohella Jeannelle annettiin vanha ruostunut miekka, jota hän kantoi tulevassa taistelussa.
      ellauri164.html on line 328: Satavuotinen sota on nimi, jonka historioitsijat ovat antaneet sarjalle toisiinsa liittyviä sotia, joita käytiin 116 vuoden jakson aikana Englannin ja Ranskan välillä. Yhteenotot alkoivat vuonna 1337 ja päättyivät 1453.
      ellauri164.html on line 370: I thought this was one of those books that comes with a “guarantee.” But of course there is no such thing. Still, I’d read only glowing reviews and boy was I ready for a “triumphant experience.” But on p. 26 I couldn’t make heads or tails of what I was really reading about. On p. 54 the voice of the innocent and well-meaning young priest began to irk the shit out of me. On p. 55 I skipped ahead to see if anything would ever actually happen to dilute all the fluffy introspection and it didn’t look promising. On p. 64 I took the kitty to the well and drowned it.
      ellauri164.html on line 372: I blew through this novel myself, which in retrospect was somewhat of a grave mistake, as the book alternates between compelling and highly engaging dialogues to unrealistically long monologues which to me resemble a Rimbaud poem in translation than anything else, which is to say: hard to parse. That they got more than what they bargained for is what the ordinary reader will be struck by first when they read this. The complexity of each of the conversations cannot be overstated, which I think will inevitably result in readers just mechanically scanning the sentences rather than internalizing the arguments, with the final result being the great part of the novel sliding off like rain, leaving only vague impressions like it did with me unfortunately, but the parts that did affect me left me very humbled. And chiefly this impression will not be helped by another one of the defining features of the novel, which is its vagueness. It deliberately leaves a lot of key details unheard and leaves a lot to the ability to infer events by the reader. Though sometimes frustrating to a reader like me who reads history and biography, I recognize that it should be so for this novel, for the main conflict in it is a psychological one, so I wouldn't have it any other way.
      ellauri164.html on line 379: I wanted to like this book so much more than I did. I actually found it incredibly difficult to understand. Some of it, I think, was that it was poorly translated. I read a 1962 edition that doesn't even cite a translator -- so many of the sentences were so convoluted as to be utterly obtuse. Poor translation or witless reader? I never could figure out why Mlle Chantal was such an angry bitch and why she insisted on tormenting the priest. What was her secret? Was the priest an alcoholic or just terminally sick? Gay? Why did M le Comte come to hate the priest? These are just some of the basic narrative issues I couldn't figure out. Forget the whole spiritual aspect--much of what the priest mused on and felt was incomprehensible to me as he described it. I can't help wondering if I'd have understood it if I had read it in French. Or maybe I'm just so spiritually challenged (in a God believing, Catholic way) that I can't comprehend it when it's described. All of that said, there were profoundly moving passages here and there, but over all I don't begin to know what I read. It's rather embarrassing actually--I feel so simple! (less)
      ellauri164.html on line 386: What makes the saga so compelling is the gentle, uncomplaining way the new priest relates his many failures and humiliations. As his audience we see his kindnesses misunderstood and his simple mistakes turned against him. And yet he is determined to go out and visit all within his parish despite mounting health problems. But does he really like anybody? Except the motorbike chap perhaps.
      ellauri164.html on line 388: I wouldn't recommend this much for a modern audience, or at least one not interested in debates of the nature of God's love. Human love there is precious little of. And no sex.
      ellauri164.html on line 395: I am not getting from this book what I expected based on other reviews, and not what I wanted from it either. I tried, read almost half of it. There was not as much about the interaction with his parishioners as about the lectures he gets from older priests and his superiors. And here was not much spiritual inspiration for this reader. A bit ponderous. This goes on my "life is too short" shelf. (less)
      ellauri164.html on line 414: I'm afraid this is absolutely not readable any more. I gave up after 70 pages. My bad? ...more
      ellauri164.html on line 431: Wonderful work. The dialogue is enthralling and the intimate sighs of this fictitious priest are mesmerising. Love people simply and thoroughly - that’s all this poor priest could do, yet it is in doing this that Christ is most thoroughly communicated.
      ellauri164.html on line 437: "In this classic Catholic novel, Bernanos movingly recounts the life of a young French country priest who grows to understand his provincial parish while learning spiritual humility himself." Pro primo, ei se näytä koko aikana ymmärtävän tai edes välittävän kenestäkään juuri midiä. Pro secundo, koko kirja on yhtä nöyrän piiraan mutustelua. Siitä puhe mistä puute. This man shares something with Isaiah’s “worm among men.” Ich aber bin ein Wurm und kein Mensch. Ich bin eine Ratte (Psalmit 22:6).
      ellauri164.html on line 455: The film was produced solely by Mosfilm, without a direct participation of DEFA, and yet several East German actors were invited to play the German historical figures. Fritz Diez, who appeared as Hitler on screen for the sixth time in his career, was given also the role of Otto Hahn.
      ellauri164.html on line 458: Between 1934 and 1938, he worked with Strassmann and Meitner on the study of isotopes created through the neutron bombardment of uranium and thorium, which led to the discovery of nuclear fission. He was an opponent of national socialism and the persecution of Jews by the Nazi Party that caused the removal of many of his colleagues, including Meitner, who was forced to flee Germany in 1938.
      ellauri164.html on line 463: Googlen lähin IMDb osuma on "Take aim at the police van (1960) - Tähtäimessä vankiauto". Original title: 'Jûsangô taihisen' yori: Sono gosôsha o nerae 1960. K-12. 1h 19m. A prison truck is assaulted and the two convicts inside are murdered. The prison guard on duty gets suspended for negligence and takes it upon himself to track down the killers. Maalitetuista on tullut liittolaisia. Olikohan vankimaalitaulut neuvostotiedemiehiä tai vallan nazeja?
      ellauri164.html on line 483: Moses is one of the most prominent figures in the Old Testament. While Abraham is called the “Father of the Faithful” and the recipient of God’s unconditional covenant of grace to His people, Moses was the man chosen to bring redemption to His people. God specifically chose Moses to lead the Israelites from captivity in Egypt to salvation in the Promised Land. Moses is also recognized as the mediator of the Old Covenant and is commonly referred to as the giver of the Law. Finally, Moses is the principal author of the Pentateuch, the foundational books of the entire Bible. Moses’ role in the Old Testament is a type and shadow of the role Jesus plays in the New Testament. As such, his life is definitely worth examining.
      ellauri164.html on line 485: We first encounter Moses in the opening chapters of the book of Exodus. In chapter 1, we learn that, after the patriarch Joseph rescued his family from the great famine and situated them in the land of Goshen (in Egypt), the descendants of Abraham lived in peace for several generations until there rose to power in Egypt a pharaoh who “did not know Joseph” (Exodus 1:8). This pharaoh subjugated the Hebrew people and used them as slaves for his massive building projects. Because God blessed the Hebrew people with rapid numeric growth, the Egyptians began to fear the increasing number of Jews living in their land. So, Pharaoh ordered the death of all male children born to Hebrew women (Exodus 1:22).
      ellauri164.html on line 487: In Exodus 2, we see Moses’ mother attempting to save her child by placing him in a basket and putting it into the Nile. The basket was eventually found by Pharaoh’s daughter, and she adopted him as her own and raised him in the palace of the pharaoh himself. As Moses grew into adulthood, he began to empathize with the plight of his people, and upon witnessing an Egyptian beating a Hebrew slave, Moses intervened and killed the Egyptian. But that was not a sin because the guy was just an Egyptian. In another incident, Moses attempted to intervene in a dispute between two Hebrews, but one of the Hebrews rebuked Moses and sarcastically commented, “Are you going to kill me as you did the Egyptian?” (Exodus 2:14). Realizing that his criminal act was made known, Moses fled to the land of Midian where he again intervened—this time rescuing the daughters of Jethro from some bandits. In gratitude, Jethro (also called Reuel) granted his daughter Zipporah to Moses in marriage (Exodus 2:15–21). Moses lived in Midian for about forty years.
      ellauri164.html on line 489: The next major incident in Moses’ life was his encounter with God at the burning bush (Exodus 3—4), where God called Moses to be the savior of His people. Despite his initial excuses and outright request that God send someone else, Moses agreed to obey God. God promised to send Aaron, Moses’ brother, along with him. The rest of the story is fairly well known. Moses and his brother, Aaron, go to Pharaoh in God’s name and demand that he let the people go to worship their God. Pharaoh stubbornly refuses, and ten plagues of God’s judgment fall upon the people and the land, the final plague being the slaying of the firstborn. Prior to this final plague, God commands Moses to institute the Passover, which is commemorative of God’s saving act in redeeming His people from bondage in Egypt.
      ellauri164.html on line 493: The rest of the book of Exodus and the entire book of Leviticus take place while the Israelites are encamped at the foot of Sinai. God gives Moses detailed instructions for the building of the tabernacle—a traveling tent of worship that could be assembled and disassembled for easy portability—and for making the utensils for worship, the priestly garb, and the ark of the covenant, symbolic of God’s presence among His people as well as the place where the high priest would perform the annual atonement. God also gives Moses explicit instructions on how God is to be worshiped and guidelines for maintaining purity and holiness among the people. The book of Numbers sees the Israelites move from Sinai to the edge of the Promised Land, but they refuse to go in when ten out of twelve spies bring back a bad report about Israel’s ability to take over the land. God condemns this generation of Jews to die in the wilderness for their disobedience and subjects them to forty years of wandering in the wilderness. By the end of the book of Numbers, the next generation of Israelites is back on the borders of the Promised Land and poised to trust God and take it by faith.
      ellauri164.html on line 495: The book of Deuteronomy shows Moses giving several sermon-type speeches to the people, reminding them of God’s saving power and faithfulness. He gives the second reading of the Law (Deuteronomy 5) and prepares this generation of Israelites to receive the promises of God. Moses himself is prohibited from entering the land because of his sin at Meribah (Numbers 20:10-13). At the end of the book of Deuteronomy, Moses’ death is recorded (Deuteronomy 34). He climbed Mount Nebo and is allowed to look upon the Promised Land. Moses was 120 years old when he died, and the Bible records that his “eye was undimmed and his vigor unabated” (Deuteronomy 34:7). The Lord Himself buried Moses (Deuteronomy 34:5–6), and Joshua took over as leader of the people (Deuteronomy 34:9). Deuteronomy 34:10–12 says, " Since then, no prophet has risen in Israel like Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face, who did all those signs and wonders the Lord sent him to do in Egypt—to Pharaoh and to all his officials and to his whole land. For no one has ever shown the mighty power or performed the awesome deeds that Moses did in the sight of all Israel."
      ellauri164.html on line 497: The above is only a brief sketch of Moses’ life and does not talk about his interactions with God, the manner in which he led the people, some of the specific ways in which he foreshadowed Jesus Christ, his centrality to the Jewish faith, his appearance at Jesus’ transfiguration, and other details. But it does give us some framework of the man. He is somewhat recalcitrant, to put it mildly.
      ellauri164.html on line 498: So, now, what can we learn from Moses’ life? Moses’ life is generally broken down into three 40-year periods. The first is his life in the court of Pharaoh. As the adopted son of Pharaoh’s daughter, Moses would have had all the perks and privileges of a prince of Egypt. He was instructed “in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and he was mighty in his words and deeds” (Acts 7:22). As the plight of the Hebrews began to disturb his soul, Moses took it upon himself to be the savior of his people. As Stephen says before the Jewish ruling council, “[Moses] supposed that his brothers would understand that God was giving them salvation by his hand” (Acts 7:25). From this incident, we learn that Moses was a man of action as well as a man possessed of a hot temper and prone to rash actions. Did God want to save His people? Yes. Did God want to use Moses as His chosen instrument of salvation? Yes. But Moses, whether or not he was truly cognizant of his role in the salvation of the Hebrew people, acted rashly and impetuously. He tried to do in his timing what God wanted done in His timing. The lesson for us is obvious: we must be acutely aware of not only doing God’s will, but doing God’s will in His timing, not ours. As is the case with so many other biblical examples, when we attempt to do God’s will in our timing, we make a bigger mess than originally existed.
      ellauri164.html on line 500: Moses needed time to grow and mature and learn to be meek and eat humble pie before God, and this brings us to the next chapter in Moses’ life, his 40 years in the land of Midian. During this time, Moses learned the simple life of a shepherd, a husband, and a father. God took an impulsive and hot-tempered young man and began the process of molding and shaping him into the perfect instrument for God to use. What can we learn from this time in his life? If the first lesson is to wait on God’s timing, the second lesson is to not be idle while we wait on God’s timing. While the Bible doesn’t spend a lot of time on the details of this part of Moses’ life, it’s not as if Moses were sitting idly by waiting for God’s call. He spent the better part of 40 years learning the ways of a shepherd and supporting and raising a family. These are not trivial things! While we might long for the “mountain top” experiences with God, 99 percent of our lives is lived in the valley doing the mundane, day-to-day things that make up a life. We need to be living for God “in the valley” before He will enlist us into the battle. It is often in the seemingly trivial things of life that God trains and prepares us for His call in the next season.
      ellauri164.html on line 502: Another thing we see from Moses during his time spent in Midian is that, when God finally did call him into service, Moses was resistant. The man of action early in his life, Moses, now 80 years old, became overly timid. When called to speak for God, Moses said he was “slow of speech and tongue” (Exodus 4:10). Some commentators believe that Moses may have had a speech impediment. Perhaps, but then it would be odd for Stephen to say Moses was “mighty in words and deeds” (Acts 7:22). Perhaps Moses just didn’t want to go back into Egypt and fail again. This isn’t an uncommon feeling. How many of us have tried to do something (whether or not it was for God) and failed, and then been hesitant to try again? There are two things Moses seemed to have overlooked. One was the obvious change that had occurred in his own life in the intervening 40 years. The other, and more important, change was that God would be with him. Moses failed at first not so much because he acted impulsively, but because he acted without God. Therefore, the lesson to be learned here is that when you discern a clear call from God, step forward in faith, knowing that God goes with you! Do not be timid, but be strong in the Lord and in the power of his might (Ephesians 6:10).
      ellauri164.html on line 504: The third and final chapter in Moses’ life is the chapter that Scripture spends the most time chronicling, namely, his role in the redemption of Israel. Several lessons can be gleaned from this chapter of Moses’ life as well. First is how to be an effective leader of people. Moses essentially had responsibility over two million Hebrew refugees. When things began to wear on him, his father-in-law, Jethro Tull, suggested that he delegate responsibility to other faithful men, a lesson that many people in authority over others need to learn (Exodus 18). We also see a man who was dependent on the grace of God to help with his task. Moses was continually pleading on behalf of the people before God. If only all people in authority would petition God on behalf of those over whom they are in charge! Moses was keenly aware of the necessity of God’s presence and even requested to see God’s glory (Exodus 33). Moses knew that, apart from God, the exodus would be meaningless. It was God who made the Israelites distinct, and they needed Him most. Moses’ life also teaches us the lesson that there are certain sins that will continue to haunt us throughout our lives. The same hot temper that got Moses into trouble in Egypt also got him into trouble during the wilderness wanderings. In the aforementioned incident at Meribah, Moses struck the rock in anger in order to provide water for the people. However, he didn’t give God the glory, nor did he follow God’s precise commands. Because of this, God forbade him from entering the Promised Land. In a similar manner, we all succumb to certain besetting sins which plague us all our days, sins that require us to be on constant alert.
      ellauri164.html on line 506: These are just a handful of practical lessons that we can learn from Moses’ life. However, if we look at Moses’ life in light of the overall panoply of Scripture, we see larger theological truths that fit into the story of redemption. In chapter 11 the author of Hebrews uses Moses as an example of faith. We learn that it was by faith that Moses refused the glories of Pharaoh’s palace to identify with the plight of his people. The writer of Hebrews says, “[Moses] considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt” (Hebrews 11:26). Moses’ life was one of faith, and we know that without faith it is impossible to please God (Hebrews 11:6). Likewise, it is by faith that we, looking forward to heavenly riches, can endure temporal hardships in this lifetime (2 Corinthians 4:17–18).
      ellauri164.html on line 508: As mentioned earlier, we also know that Moses’ life was typological of the life of Christ. Like Christ, Moses was the mediator of a covenant. Christ too was a little recalcitrant, so he got crucified. Again, the author of Hebrews goes to great lengths to demonstrate this point (cf. Hebrews 3; 8—10). The Apostle Paul also makes the same points in 2 Corinthians 3. The difference is that the covenant that Moses mediated was temporal and conditional, whereas the covenant that Christ mediates is eternal and unconditional. Like Christ, Moses provided redemption for his people. Moses delivered the people of Israel out of slavery and bondage in Egypt and brought them to the Promised Land of Canaan. Christ delivers His people out of bondage and slavery to sin and condemnation and brings them to the Promised Land of eternal life on a renewed earth, like Azrael in the forthcoming third season of His Dark Materials. Like Christ he returns to consummate the kingdom He inaugurated at His first coming. Like Christ, Moses was a prophet to his people. Moses spoke the very words of God to the Israelites just as Christ did (John 17:8). Moses predicted that the Lord would raise up another prophet like him from among the people (Deuteronomy 18:15). Jesus and the early church taught and believed that Moses was speaking of Jesus when he wrote those words (cf. John 5:46, Acts 3:22, 7:37). In so many ways, Moses’ life is a precursor to the life of Christ. As such, we can catch a glimpse of how God was working His plan of redemption in the lives of faithful people throughout human history. This gives us hope that, just as God saved His people and gave them rest through the actions of Moses, so, too, will God save us and give us an eternal Sabbath rest in Christ, both now and in the life to come. But don't get your hopes too high, you may not be among the chosen after all.
      ellauri164.html on line 510: Finally, it is interesting to note that, even though Moses never set foot in the Promised Land during his lifetime, he was given an opportunity to enter the Promised Land after his death. On the mount of transfiguration, when Jesus gave His disciples a taste of His full glory, He was accompanied by two Old Testament figures, Moses and Elijah, who represented the Law and the Prophets. Moses is, this day, experiencing the true Sabbath rest in Christ that one day all Christians will share (Hebrews 4:9).
      ellauri164.html on line 520: Why have you dealt ill with your servant? And why have I not found favor in your sight, that you lay the burden of all this people on me? Did I conceive all this people? Did I give them birth, that you should say to me, “Carry them in your bosom, as a nurse carries a nursing child,” to the land that you swore to give their fathers? … I am not able to carry all this people alone; the burden is too heavy for me. If you will treat me like this, kill me at once, if I find favor in your sight, that I may not see my wretchedness (Numbers 11:11-12, 14-15).
      ellauri164.html on line 523: Moses was so dispirited that he preferred to die rather than continue on in this way. In his weariness, he spoke rashly, and God excluded him from leading the people into the Promised Land.
      ellauri164.html on line 524: Now there was no water for the congregation. And they assembled themselves together against Moses and against Aaron. And the people quarreled with Moses and said, “Would that we had perished when our brothers perished before the Lord! Why have you brought the assembly of the Lord into this wilderness, that we should die here, both we and our cattle? And why have you made us come up out of Egypt to bring us to this wretched place which has neither grain nor figs nor vines nor pomegranates? Here there is not even water to drink!” But Moses and Aaron went way from the assembly to the entrance of the meeting tent, where they fell prostrate.
      ellauri164.html on line 527: And Moses took the staff from before the Lord, as he commanded him. He and Aaron gathered the assembly together before the rock, and he said to them, “Hear now, you rebels! Are we to bring water for you out of this rock?” And Moses lifted up his hand and struck the rock with his staff twice, and water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their livestock.
      ellauri164.html on line 528: But the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not believe in me, to uphold me as holy in the eyes of the people of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them” (Numbers 20:2-12).
      ellauri164.html on line 532: 1. Moses sinned by not following the Lord’s instruction. The Lord told Moses to take his staff in hand and bid the rock to bring forth water. He was told to speak to the rock, but instead he struck it—twice. The striking of the rock, while not specifically directed according to the passage in Numbers, does not seem particularly egregious; in fact, in another description of this event (see Exodus 17:6) God does tell Moses to strike it. The Fathers of the Church (e.g., St. Jerome) did not view this as sinful, even interpreting the striking of the rock twice as a sign of the two bars of the cross.
      ellauri164.html on line 533: 2. Moses exhibited sinful pride. Having assembled the people, Moses reviled them, saying, “Hear now, you rebels!” He then continued, perhaps pridefully, “Shall we bring water for you out of this rock?” Neither Moses nor Aaron can bring forth water, however; only God can do that. Some of the Fathers of the Church interpreted this not as pride on Moses’ part but rather as an indication of the wavering of his faith.
      ellauri164.html on line 534: 3. Moses sinned by speaking harshly and rashly. Psalm 106 seems to favor this interpretation. They angered the Lord at the waters of Meribah, and it went ill with Moses on their account, for they made his spirit bitter, and he spoke rashly with his lips (Psalm 106:32-33).
      ellauri164.html on line 536: This third explanation leads us back to the heart of our meditation: grumbling causes harm to the ones who grumble and to others who hear it. Moses was worn out by their complaining; as Psalm 106 says, his spirit grew bitter. He spoke rashly and reviled the people; in a flash of anger, he may also have yielded to sinful pride.
      ellauri164.html on line 540: Whatever the reason for the drastic punishment, behold what grumbling does. It fuels discontent and bitterness. Be careful, fellow Christians; we can all succumb to the temptation to draw others into our anger, doubts, dissatisfaction, and fears. After all, misery loves company. Sharing concerns with friends is good and necessary, but this must be tempered by the knowledge that too much can harm them and us. A steady diet of grumbling is not good for anyone.
      ellauri164.html on line 548: 1. Moses, being directed to speak to the rock that it might give forth its water, smote it instead with the rod of God which was in his hazed (what's a hazed?) and this he did not once only, but twice.
      ellauri164.html on line 550: 2. He spoke to the people, not with meekness and calm authority, but in heat and bitterness. "Ye rebels, must we fetch you water out of this rock?" Thus he "spake unadvisedly with his lips" (Psalm 106:33) instead of his stick. It is not difficult to understand how Moses should have so far forgotten himself on this occasion. Let the facts be weighed. The servant of the Lord is now 120 years old. The generation which sinned thirty-seven years ago, and was condemned to die in the wilderness, is nearly all gone. Moses is mortified to find that the new generation is infected with a touch of the same impatient unbelief which wrought in their fathers so much mischief. No sooner are they at a loss for water than they rise against Moses with rebellious murmurings. For once he loses command of himself. On all former occasions of the kind his meekness was unshaken; he either held his peace, or prayed for the rebels, or at most called on the Lord to be his Witness and Judge. Now he breaks out into bitter chidings. At the root of this there was a secret failure of faith. "Ye believed me not," - did not thoroughly rely on my faithfulness and power, - "to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel" (verse 12). His former meekness had been the fruit of faith. He had been thoroughly persuaded that the Lord who was with him could accomplish all he had promised, and therefore he faced every difficulty with calm and patient resolution. Now a touch of unbelief bred in him hastiness and bitterness of spirit.
      ellauri164.html on line 552: Two lessons: 1. The failings of good men may be culpable in God's sight and displeasing to him out of all proportion to the degree of blameworthiness they present to our eye. So far is it from being true (as many seem to think) that believers' sins are no sins at all, and need give no concern, that, on the contrary, the Lord dislikes the stain of sin most when it is seen in his dear children. The case of Moses is not singular. Sins which the Lord overlooks in other men he will occasionally put some mark of special displeasure upon, when they are committed by one who is eminent for holiness and honourable service. It is, no doubt, a just instinct which leads all right-thinking people to be blind to the failings of good men who have been signally useful in their day. But if the good men become indulgent to their own faults they are likely to be rudely awakened to a sense of their error. The better a man is, his sins may be the more dishonouring to God. A spot hardly visible on the coat of a labouring man, may be glaringly offensive on the shining raiment of a throned king.
      ellauri164.html on line 554: 2. The sins we are least inclined to may nevertheless be the sins which will bring us to the bitterest grief. Every man has his weak side. There are sins to which our natural disposition or the circumstances of our up-bringing lay us peculiarly open; and it is without doubt a good rule to be specially on our guard in relation to these sins. Yet the rule must not be applied too rigidly. When Dumbarton Rock was taken, it was not by assailing the fortifications thrown up to protect its one weak side, but by scaling it at a point where the precipitous height seemed to render defense or guard unnecessary. Job was the most patient of men, yet he sinned through impatience. Peter was courageous, yet he fell through cowardice. Moses was the meekest of men, yet he fell through bitterness of Spirit. We have need to guard well not our weak points only, but the points also at which we deem ourselves to be strong.
      ellauri164.html on line 556: Parallel Verses: Yahweh said to Moses and Aaron, "Because you didn't believe in me, to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land which I have given them."
      ellauri164.html on line 564: They angrily inquired, "Why have ye brought up the congregation of the Lord into this wilderness, that we and our cattle should die there? And wherefore have ye made us to come up out of Egypt, to bring us in unto this evil place? it is no place of seed, or of figs, or of vines, or of pomegranates; neither is there any water to drink. What the fuck, you call this a promised land?
      ellauri164.html on line 566: "And Moses and Aaron went from the presence of the assembly unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and they fell upon their faces: and the glory of the Lord appeared unto them. And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Take the rod, and gather thou the assembly together, thou, and Aaron thy brother, and speak ye unto the rock before their eyes; and it shall give forth his water, and thou shalt bring forth to them water out of the rock: so thou shalt give the congregation and their beasts to drink. And Moses took the rod from before the Lord, as He commanded him.
      ellauri164.html on line 568: Moses Yields to Impatience. "And Moses and Aaron gathered the congregation together before the rock; and he said unto them, Hear now, ye rebels; must we fetch you water out of this rock? And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts also. And the Lord spake unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye believed Me not, to sanctify Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them."
      ellauri164.html on line 570: Here Moses sinned. He became wearied with the continual murmurings of the people against him, and the continual murmuring to stupid rocks. At the commandment of the Lord, took the rod, and, instead of speaking to the rock, as God commanded him, he smote it with the rod twice, after saying, "Must we fetch you water out of this rock?" He here spoke unadvisedly with his lips. He did not say, God will now show you another evidence of His power and bring you water out of this rock. He did not ascribe the power and glory to God for causing water to again flow from the flinty rock, and therefore did not magnify Him before the people. For this failure on the part of Moses, God would not permit him to lead the people to the Promised Land.
      ellauri164.html on line 572: This necessity for the manifestation of God's power made the occasion one of great solemnity, and Moses and Aaron should have improved it to make a favorable impression upon the people. But Moses was stirred, and in impatience and anger with the people, because of their murmurings, he said, "Hear now, ye rebels, must we fetch you water out of this rock?" In thus speaking he virtually admitted to murmuring Israel that they were correct in charging him with leading them from Egypt. God had forgiven the people greater transgressions than this error on the part of Moses, but He could not regard a sin in a leader of His people as in those who were led. He could not excuse the sin of Moses and permit him to enter the Promised Land.
      ellauri164.html on line 576: Moses took glory to himself which belonged to God, and made it necessary for God to do that in his case which should forever satisfy rebellious Israel that it was not Moses who had led them from Egypt,
      ellauri164.html on line 579: The Heavy Penalty. The Lord would remove this impression forever from their minds, by forbidding Moses to enter the Promised Land. The Lord had highly exalted Moses. He had revealed to him His great glory. He had taken him into a sacred nearness with Himself upon the mount, and had condescended to talk with him as a man speaketh with a friend. He had communicated to Moses, and through him to the people, His will, His statutes, and His laws. His being thus exalted and honored of God made his error of greater magnitude. Moses repented of his sin and humbled himself greatly before God. He related to all Israel his sorrow for his sin. The result of his sin he did not conceal, but told them that for thus failing to ascribe glory to God, he could not lead them to the Promised Land. He then asked them, if this error upon his part was so great as to be thus corrected of God, how God would regard their repeated murmurings in charging him (Moses) with the uncommon visitations of God because of their sins.
      ellauri164.html on line 581: For this single instance, Moses had allowed the impression to be entertained that he had brought them water out of the rock, when he should have magnified the name of the Lord among His people. The Lord would now settle the matter with His people, that Moses was merely a man, following the guidance and direction of a mightier than he, even the Son of God. In this He would leave them without doubt. Where much is given, much is required. Moses had been highly favored with special views of God's majesty. The light and glory of God had been imparted to him in rich abundance. His face had reflected upon the people the glory that the Lord had let shine upon him. All will be judged according to the privileges they have had, and the light and benefits bestowed.
      ellauri164.html on line 583: The sins of good men, whose general deportment has been worthy of imitation, are peculiarly offensive to God. They cause Satan to triumph, and to taunt the angels of God with the failings of God's chosen instruments, and give the unrighteous occasion to lift themselves up against God. The Lord had Himself led Moses in a special manner, and had revealed to him His glory, as to no other upon the earth. He was naturally impatient, but had taken hold firmly of the grace of God and so humbly implored wisdom from heaven that he was strengthened from God and had overcome his impatience so that he was called of God the meekest man upon the face of the whole earth.
      ellauri164.html on line 586: water from the rock at Meribah. Moses and the sons of Aaron buried him in the mount, that the people might not be tempted to make too great ceremony over his body, and be guilty of the sin of idolatry.
      ellauri164.html on line 591: Moses’ moment of greatest failure came when the people of Israel resumed complaining, this time about food and water (Num. 20:1-5). Moses and Aaron decided to bring the complaint to the Lord, who commanded them to take their staff, and in the people’s presence command a rock to yield water enough for the people and their livestock (Num. 20:6-8). Moses did as the Lord instructed but added two flourishes of his own. First he rebuked the people, saying, “Listen, you rebels, shall we bring water for you out of this rock?” Then he struck the rock twice with his staff. Water poured out in abundance (Num. 20:9-11), but the Lord was extremely displeased with Moses and Aaron.
      ellauri164.html on line 593: God's punishment was harsh. “Because you did not trust in me, to show my holiness before the eyes of the Israelites, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them” (Num.20:12). Moses and Aaron, like all the people who rebelled against God’s plan earlier (Num. 14:22-23), will not be permitted to enter the Promised Land.
      ellauri164.html on line 595: Scholarly arguments about the exact action Moses was punished for may be found in any of the general commentaries, but the text of Num­bers 20:12 names the underlying offense directly, “You did not trust in me.” Moses’ leadership faltered in the crucial moment when he stopped trusting God and started acting on his own impulses.
      ellauri164.html on line 597: Honoring God in leadership—as all Christian leaders in every sphere must attempt to do—is a terrifying responsibility. Whether we lead a business, a classroom, a relief organization, a household, or any other organization, we must be careful not to mistake our authority for God’s. What can we do to keep ourselves in obedience to God? Meeting regularly with an accountability (or “peer”) group, praying daily about the tasks of leadership, keeping a weekly Sabbath to rest in God’s presence, and seeking others’ perspective on God’s guidance are methods some lead­ers employ. Even so, the task of leading firmly while remaining wholly dependent on God is beyond human capability. If the most humble man on the face of the earth (Num. 12:3) could fail in this way, so can we. By God’s grace, even failures as great as Moses’ at Meribah, with disastrous consequences in this life, do not separate us from the ultimate fulfillment of God’s promises. Moses did not enter the Promised Land, yet the New Testament declares him “faithful in all God’s house” and reminds us of the confidence that all in God’s house have in the fulfillment of our redemption in Christ (Heb. 3:2-6).
      ellauri164.html on line 605: According to the opinio communis of the exegetes, the sin of Moses is one of the most difficult conundrums to resolve in the history of interpretation. This Pentateuchal puzzle has not only perplexed ancient and modern exegetes but has also produced a multiplicity of answers. A plethora of explanations proposed by exegetes on the sin of Moses appears to be strong on conjectural ingenuity but weak on textual evidence.
      ellauri164.html on line 609: The main thrust of this book is that the sin of Moses recorded in Numbers 20:1-13 is linked to the unlawful and wilful act of trifling with the sacred staff in striking the rock. This is because the staff of Moses has already become the staff of God (Exod. 4:20;17;9).
      ellauri164.html on line 623:

      It is Numbers 20:1-13 again. Miriam was gone. Moses had just buried his sister in Kadesh, in the Wilderness of Zin (Numbers 20:1). She had placed his basket among the reeds of the Nile and had run to get his mother when Pharaoh’s daughter drew him out. His sister had been with him through all his trials in the wilderness. But now Miriam was gone.
      ellauri164.html on line 628: Moses was in no mood to deal with this today. Why couldn’t these people let him mourn his sister in peace? Why had God brought them to a dry thirsty land with no water again? Why did these people always blame him? Why didn’t these people bring their problems to God in prayer instead of always complaining to him? Why were there always so many demands on him? Why was it always “Moses, Moses, Moses”?
      ellauri164.html on line 630: God told Moses to speak to the rock, saying it would pour out water. He was supposed to speak peaceably to the rock this time (Numbers 20:6-9).
      ellauri164.html on line 631: Take the rod, and gather thou the assembly together, thou, and Aaron thy brother, and speak ye unto the rock before their eyes; and it shall give forth his water, and thou shalt bring forth to them water out of the rock: so thou shalt give the congregation and their beasts drink. (Numbers 20:8)
      ellauri164.html on line 633: But Moses was not feeling peaceful today. He was grieving the loss of his sister. He was tired. He was thirsty. He was frustrated. He was angry.
      ellauri164.html on line 634: So Moses claimed credit for giving the rebels water by saying, “Must WE bring water out of this rock for you?” Then, in his anger, Moses struck the rock instead of speaking to it.
      ellauri164.html on line 636: “And Moses and Aaron gathered the congregation together before the rock, and he said unto them, Hear now, ye rebels; must we fetch you water out of this rock? And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts also. ” (Numbers 20:10-11)
      ellauri164.html on line 637: Moses had always done exactly as God commanded – until now. This time, Moses dishonored God by disobeying His command. Moses sinned.
      ellauri164.html on line 643: Moses had always done exactly as God commanded – UNTIL NOW. Moses was devastated when God pronounced his judgment (Numbers 20:12). He had obeyed God’s call to go to Egypt to free the Israelites from bondage. God had worked mighty miracles through him.
      ellauri164.html on line 653: Not even Moses could keep the law. God is gracious. Moses was not stoned to death for his disobedience. Wow. God allowed Moses to keep serving Him, and God kept using him to lead His people to the Promised Land.
      ellauri164.html on line 657: The Promised Land can only be received by God’s grace. So it was Joshua who led God’s people into the Promised Land. Joshua means “Jehovah saves.” In the New Testament, this name is “Jesus.”
      ellauri164.html on line 660: If you liked this, you may also like:

      ellauri164.html on line 671: 10 Then Moses and Aaron gathered the assembly together before the rock, and he said to them, “Hear now, you rebels: shall we bring water for you out of this rock?” 11 And Moses lifted up his hand and struck the rock with his staff twice, and water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their livestock.” (Num. 20: 8,10–11 ESV)
      ellauri164.html on line 679: “And the LORD said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not believe in me, to uphold me as holy in the eyes of the people of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them.”” (Num. 20:12 ESV)
      ellauri164.html on line 682: What did Moses have to say about his failure?
      ellauri164.html on line 683: Moses said that his failure was in someway connected to the people:
      ellauri164.html on line 687: But the LORD was angry with me because of you and would not listen to me. And the LORD said to me, ‘Enough from you; do not speak to me of this matter again. (Deut. 3:26 ESV)
      ellauri164.html on line 694: To answer this question we must examine a pattern that developed in the book of Numbers. Three times prior to the incident at the rock of Meribah the people sinned, God punished them, Moses interceded on the people’s behalf, and God pardoned the people. Please take the time to read these events in Numbers chapters 11, 14, 16 & 20. Notice the pattern in the table below.
      ellauri164.html on line 703: When a Bible author develops a pattern and then breaks it, we should pay attention because this signals that the author wants us to notice something important.
      ellauri164.html on line 705: Based on the pattern established in Numbers, what do you expect will happen at Meribah when the people rebel against Moses? We expect the pattern to repeat and for God to decree punishment, but that doesn’t happen. The pattern breaks down! Instead of decreeing punishment for the people’s sin, God simply tells Moses to give the people water by speaking to the rock. This is a significant departure from the previous pattern. When a Bible author develops a pattern and then breaks it, we should pay attention because this signals that the author wants us to notice something important. Why didn’t God punish the people at Meribah? Why did he go at Moses instead?
      ellauri164.html on line 707: To understand why God didn’t pronounce judgement, let’s notice what Moses did. He leads the people to the rock, calls them rebels, and instead of speaking to the rock he hits it twice with this staff. Moses is having a temper tantrum. In the prior examples in Numbers Moses never speaks harshly or loses patience. Moses is also breaking the pattern and this is the clue to understanding his sin.
      ellauri164.html on line 709: He has reached the end of his rope. He has been patient with these complaining and rebellious people, but he couldn’t take it any longer. Their constant ingratitude and rebelliousness caused Moses to lose faith in the people. This is the people that were supposed to be God’s treasured possession, a holy nation of priests who had agreed to be in a covenant relationship with God (Ex 19:5-8). What a disappointment they had turned out to be and Moses was finished interceding for them. God knew Moses was not going to intercede for the people at Meribah, therefore He doesn’t ordain punishment for them.
      ellauri164.html on line 711: So, how does this connect back to Moses being barred from entering the Promised Land? Because the people were unfaithful and so difficult to lead, Moses’s own faith suffered. This caused him to lose confidence that God could develop the Israelites into a faithful covenant people who were meant to be a nation of priests and a means of blessing the nations.
      ellauri164.html on line 713: This is understandable. Haven’t you had people in your life that were so difficult that you have jokingly said, “Even God couldn’t do anything with them!” Moses had reached this point, but he wasn’t joking.
      ellauri164.html on line 715: If there is any doubt this was Moses’s problem, this verse removes it: “because you broke faith with me in the midst of the people of Israel at the waters of Meribah-kadesh, in the wilderness of Zin, and because you did not treat me as holy in the midst of the people of Israel.” (Deut. 32:51 ESV)
      ellauri164.html on line 717: Conclusion: Moses’s sin wasn’t striking the rock as such when he was told to speak to it; his sin was losing faith in God’s ability to use the Israelites for anything positive. This is why God could say that Moses didn’t trust in Him and is also why Moses could say God was angry with him on account of the people.
      ellauri164.html on line 725: Answer: Psalms 106:32-33 states that the people angered Moses at the waters of strife, that it went ill with Moses, and that he sinned with his mouth. The incident in question occurred in Numbers 20:7-13. Miriam had just passed on. The very next verse states that the people were complaining about the lack of water. This had happened many times during their wilderness experience. And like the other times, the people railed against Moses and Aaron, whining that they would have been better off if they had stayed in Egypt. Moses and Aaron responded by falling face down. They had also done this several times. Maybe they were tired of hearing the same old complaints, or maybe this was their posture of prayer. In any event, God responded quickly, telling Moses to speak to the rock in front of all the people. Water would come gushing out -- enough water for everyone.
      ellauri164.html on line 727: Moses assembled the people, but he didn't follow orders quite the way he should have. Instead of just speaking to the rock, which would have demonstrated the power of the word over the power of his rod, he struck it twice, saying, "Listen, you rebels, shall we get water for you out of this rock?" It almost sounded as though Moses was taking credit for delivering the water. That was not true. Perhaps the strain of leading the people all those years was finally starting to show. He called them rebels, which in a sense they were. But God did not tell him to do this. Nor was there any mention of God at that point. All seemed directed at Moses and Aaron: "Must we bring water out of this rock?" Depending on how it's read, it could indicate doubt on the part of Moses.
      ellauri164.html on line 729: The bottom line is that both he and Aaron disobeyed God. Moreover, the water that rushed out was no longer seen as a gift from God, but was a product of Moses and Aaron. The people were happy; God was not. He said, "You did not trust in me; and you did not honor me as holy" (Num. 20:13). Hence, neither of them would set foot into the Promised Land. Yet, it is important to notice that just as God did not abandon his people when they sinned, he did not abandon Moses and Aaron. But in this one instance, they didn't pass the test. When crunch time came, they didn't trust God. And all of this happened at the waters of Meribah.
      ellauri164.html on line 733: In reality, the people who were writing this story knew that Moses did not lead them into the Promised Land. In fact, he had completed his assignment long ago. God had instructed him to lead the people out of Egypt (Ex. 3:10). They were out of Egypt. His job was done. So maybe this wasn't a punishment at all; maybe it was a reward! He was roughly 120 years of age at this point. They all knew that settling into the Promised Land would have its challenges. That land was fully occupied, and many battles were ahead of them. Surely it was time to let Joshua take over. It was time for Moses to rest. Granted, there might have been other ways for God to accomplish this, but the writers of the story chose to tell it like this. The end result is that Moses was free of his responsibility to the people, free to be with God on the mountaintop.
      ellauri164.html on line 743: listed in Hebrews 11 in recognition of this truth.
      ellauri164.html on line 746: 3. This lesson is intended to examine his sin, and determine why
      ellauri164.html on line 754: 3. This has happened before (Exodus 17:1-4).
      ellauri164.html on line 771: 1. Moses was angry at God's people and openly expressed his anger at them.
      ellauri164.html on line 773: 3. This is quite a contrast to the normal character of Moses (Num. 12:3).
      ellauri164.html on line 802: In the first month the whole Israelite community arrived at the Desert of Zin, and they stayed at Kadesh. There Miriam died and was buried. (2) Now there was no water for the community, and the people gathered in opposition to Moses and Aaron. (3) They quarreled with Moses and said, "If only we had died when our brothers fell dead before the LORD! (4) Why did you bring the LORD's community into this desert, that we and our livestock should die here? (5) Why did you bring us up out of Egypt to this terrible place? It has no grain or figs, grapevines or pomegranates. And there is no water to drink!" (6) Moses and Aaron went from the assembly to the entrance to the Tent of Meeting and fell facedown, and the glory of the LORD appeared to them. (7) The LORD said to Moses, (8) "Take the staff, and you and your brother Aaron gather the assembly together. Speak to that rock before their eyes and it will pour out its water. You will bring water out of the rock for the community so they and their livestock can drink." (9) So Moses took the staff from the LORD's presence, just as he commanded him. (10) He and Aaron gathered the assembly together in front of the rock and Moses said to them, "Listen, you rebels, must we bring you water out of this rock?" (11) Then Moses raised his arm and struck the rock twice with his staff. Water gushed out, and the community and their livestock drank. (12) But the LORD said to Moses and Aaron, "Because you did not trust in me enough to honor me as holy in the sight of the Israelites, you will not bring this community into the land I give them." (13) These were the waters of Meribah, [1] where the Israelites quarreled with the LORD and where he showed himself holy among them.
      ellauri164.html on line 804: It often happens that Bible believing Christians reject the concept of allegory as being a legitimate way of interpreting the Bible. This comes from the belief that any way of interpreting Scripture other than literal meaning is false, particularly as it concerns Genesis 3 and evolution. But in fact allegory is common in the Bible – Christ makes frequent use of it in His parables – and even Genesis 3 is allegory (which does not preclude its literal interpretation as well.) In this section we shall examine the allegorical significance of the staff and the rock.
      ellauri164.html on line 806: Note that the Bible says (vs. 8) that Moses is to take “the” staff. By that God means the staff of Aaron, the High Priest. What do we know about this staff?
      ellauri164.html on line 815: Now we know that the staff itself is a symbol of the priesthood. But consider how this fits with Christ, our High Priest:
      ellauri164.html on line 822: The symbolism of Christ, the Rock is well known to Christians. If Christ is represented by this rock, what does that mean?
      ellauri164.html on line 824: One fact is this: Moses hit the rock twice. Is that sin? Yes indeed. Christ had to be smitten once, at His first advent, for our sins. But to be smitten twice is like crucifying Him twice[2]. This, then, is sin indeed.
      ellauri164.html on line 826: All this is true even though the water was brought forth by a leader’s error. God’s grace does not depend upon the perfection of the leader. Not even Christ.x
      ellauri164.html on line 829: Who could miss the cleansing stream of baptism in this picture?
      ellauri164.html on line 834: Now we can understand why this is sin to Moses.
      ellauri164.html on line 849: For this evildoing, Moses was not to enter the Promised Land – only to look at it from afar. There are some thoughts we can gather from this:
      ellauri164.html on line 858: Obedience. The answer to this is simply obedience. But may I submit that simple obedience requires humility?
      ellauri164.html on line 867: There are few characters that play a larger part in the story of the Bible than Moses. He is the human protagonist of four Old Testament books and is consistently held up in both the OT and NT as a shining example of faith in the promises of God. The law that he delivered to the people of Israel serves as the foundation of the nation of Israel, and is lauded by Jesus as a testament that would not pass until “heaven and earth pass away…[and] all is accomplished.” One of the great tragic moments of the Bible is where Moses is denied entrance to the Promised Land for his sin at the Rock of Meribah; after faithfully leading Israel for forty years, Moses strikes a rock instead of speaking to it and is condemned to die before living in the Promised Land. On its surface, this might seem unfair to Moses. One mess-up and God gives him this great punishment? How many times had Israel failed in their journey and at Mt. Sinai, and God had spared their lives and allowed them to keep going? Yet His most faithful servant is barred over this one, seemingly insignificant event? If we take a closer look at the text, however, we see why Moses’ failure was such a stark one. While it doesn’t diminish the tragic nature of the event, it does shed light on why God takes such a drastic step to respond.
      ellauri164.html on line 869: First, it is important to note that a pattern is established in the story of Israel and Moses. This pattern can be seen at Mt. Sinai when Aaron and Israel create the golden calf idol (Exodus 32). Israel sins, and in response to that the Lord tells Moses to step aside so that He may destroy Israel in His wrath (Exodus 32:9-10). When this occurs, Moses intercedes for Israel and pleads for God to turn away His fierce anger for His own sake (Exodus 32:11-14). This intercession works, and Israel is spared utter destruction. This pattern of sin, wrath, intercession, and relenting occurs twice more in the Book of Numbers: once in Number 14 when Israel rebels and refuses to go into the Promised Land, and again in Numbers 16 when Korah leads his rebellion against Moses and Aaron (the major difference in Numbers 16 being that Aaron is the one to intervene by offering incense for atonement to the Lord).
      ellauri164.html on line 871: This pattern shows itself again in the beginning of Numbers 20 after the death of Miriam. Once more Israel rebels against Moses and Aaron, this time over a lack of water in the desert of Zin. They claim that it would have been better to have died with Korah’s rebellion rather than wander without food and water, and they express regret over leaving Egypt, a land of “grain, figs, vines, and pomegranates.” This might seem a bold claim, since in our reading Korah has just died a few chapters earlier. Careful reading, however, indicates that there’s actually been a quiet time skip; Numbers 33:38 indicates that Aaron died in “the fortieth year after the sons of Israel had come from the land of Egypt, on the first day in the fifth month.” Given that Aaron’s death is recorded in Chapter 20, just a few verses after the episode at Meribah, this would indicate that the episode at Meribah occurred in year 38 of the 40 year wandering in the wilderness (remember that Israel had spent more than a year at Sinai in addition to travel time from Egypt to Sinai and from Sinai to the Promised Land before the wandering). This means that this rebellious generation of Israelites aren’t referencing a recent event, but instead wishing they had died nearly forty years earlier with Korah! Moses and Aaron have been dealing with this wicked and hard group of people for a very long time, and they are now claiming it would have been better to have died with Korah: a fate they were only spared because of Moses and Aaron’s own intercession!
      ellauri164.html on line 873: We would expect the pattern to repeat here. The people have rebelled, so the next part would be God’s wrath and threats of destruction. Instead, however, God merely grants their request for water. No mention of sin or possible annihilation, just grace in providing for Israel’s needs. The fact that this cycle we’ve come to expect changes is designed to highlight an important event; the oddity of the text “awakens us from our narrative slumber,” as one commentator puts it, and forces us to pay attention closely to what’s occurring. Why would God not threaten destruction? To answer that, we have to remember a key aspect of God’s character: He does not change. Hebrews 13:8 says He is the same yesterday and today and forever, “without variation or shifting shadow,” (James 1:17). The purpose of the threats of destruction, and Moses/Aaron’s intercession, was not to actually change God’s mind. God knew exactly what was going to happen in all these instances. God’s threats on Israel are spoken to Moses so that Moses will intercede. They are tests of Moses’ (and Aaron’s) character, just as God’s conversation with Abraham over the fates of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 18) was about testing Abraham’s character rather than the doomed cities. Yet here, in Numbers 20, God does not follow the pattern. Why?
      ellauri164.html on line 875: This gets us back to the question of what, exactly, Moses’ sin was. Many commentators focus on the physical actions that Moses took in verses 9-11. Some say Moses sin was striking the rock rather than speaking to it, but Moses was told to take the staff of God. Exodus 17:5-6 had Moses striking the rock to cause water to come out of the rock (in fact, it’s actually the same rock of Meribah!), so it’s possible to read an inference that the staff was to be used to strike the rock. Some commentators see Moses’ harsh words for Israel as the sin, or perhaps that he speaks to the people rather than speaking to the rock. Regardless of which of these views, they don’t account for what the text itself says: Numbers 20:12 makes it clear that the sin of Moses and Aaron was “…you have not believed Me, to treat Me as holy in the sight of the sons of Israel.” Indeed, focusing on Moses’ actions of striking the rock or speaking harshly makes it seem doubly unfair to Aaron, who had neither spoken nor struck the rock.
      ellauri164.html on line 877: The reading that makes more sense is to focus on the breaking of the pattern established to this point. Moses’ harsh words toward the Israelites reveal his emotions in this moment; he classifies Israel as “rebels” rather than the chosen people, and his rhetorical question seems to imply that he does not view Israel as worthy of God’s grace any longer. This is the real failure of Moses in this moment: he’s lost his faith in God to fulfill His promises to these people. Israel is a nation of rebels outside of grace, outside of God’s ability to make a great nation, outside of the promises that God has given. It seems nearly forty years of dealing with this people has finally broken Moses, and he is so overwhelmed in this moment that he has lost faith. From God’s perspective, Moses has lost faith in the Lord to overcome Israel’s faithlessness. Moses has not believed in God, and has not treated Yahweh as the Holy God who is able to overcome the weakness of His people. Indeed, this is exactly what Numbers 20:12 says was Moses’ sin! He (and Aaron!) did not believe God and did not treat Yahweh as holy in that moment. God did offer Moses the opportunity to intercede for the people (and thus broke the pattern) because He knew that Moses did not have faith in Him.
      ellauri164.html on line 879: This interpretation is solidified by Moses’ words about this event in the Book of Deuteronomy. Three times in the first four chapters of Deuteronomy, Moses says that he is not able to enter the Promised Land because of Israel. At first glance, again, this might seem an unfair charge. Moses had caused his own exclusion, hadn’t he? Why is he accusing the generation after the event in Numbers 20 of being the cause of his failure? If we look at these three mentions, we see a few important facts. In the first instance, Deuteronomy 1:37, Moses is recounting the failure of Israel when they listened to the 10 spies’ negative report and how God forbade that generation from entering the Promised Land, and he then says “The Lord was angry with me also on your account, saying, ‘Not even you shall enter there.’” Moses associates his inability to enter the Promised Land with Israel’s rebellion and unfaithfulness, but he also seems to be lumping the people’s refusal to enter the land (Numbers 13-14) with his own sin in Numbers 20. This is not Moses forgetting the chronology of these two events, but rather indicating that they are closely associate with one another.
      ellauri164.html on line 881: The second mention is in Deuteronomy 3:23-26, where after retelling the defeats of the kings Sihon and Og Moses relates that “I also pleaded with the Lord at that time, saying, ‘O Lord God, You have begun to show Your servant Your greatness and Your strong hand; for what god is there in heaven or on earth who can do such works and mighty acts as Yours? Let me, I pray, cross over and see the fair land that is beyond the Jordan, that good hill country and Lebanon.’ But the Lord was angry with me on your account, and would not listen to me; and the Lord said to me, ‘Enough! Speak to Me no more of this matter.” Again, Moses directly links the Lord’s anger towards him with the Israelites.
      ellauri164.html on line 883: The third mention is in Deuteronomy 4:21-23, where Moses has moved past the historical recounting and is now warning Israel of the danger of idolatry. He says ““Now the Lord was angry with me on your account, and swore that I would not cross the Jordan, and that I would not enter the good land which the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance. For I will die in this land, I shall not cross the Jordan, but you shall cross and take possession of this good land. So watch yourselves, that you do not forget the covenant of the Lord your God which He made with you, and make for yourselves a graven image in the form of anything against which the Lord your God has commanded you.” Now Moses uses his own tragic story as an illustration on the importance of avoiding idolatry in the Promised Land. So Moses’ failure to enter the Promised Land was related to the continuous rebellion of Israel, and was an illustration of the dangers of violating the covenant promises.
      ellauri164.html on line 885: Reading the Numbers 20 passage the way that has been suggested makes sense of what Moses says in Deuteronomy. He’s not shifting the blame to Israel for his own failures, but highlighting that their constant rebellion was what caused him to lose his faith in God. Moses lack of faith led him to forget the promise and covenant of God, so he is using that illustration to demonstrate the dangers of forsaking the covenant: just like Moses, Israel will be forbidden the Promised Land if they don’t maintain faith in the covenant promises of God. That’s really one of the main points of Deuteronomy. It’s not just the covenant laws for the new generation, but Moses exhorting the new generation to never lose hope in the promise of God. Moses, knowing Israel, recognizes that there will come a day when they fail to uphold the covenant and they will be punished for it, but he also recognizes that God’s promises will stand no matter how badly Israel fails to uphold it. This, then, is the main point we should derive as well: God will always keep His promises. We, as the heirs to the promises to Abraham and Israel, should always firmly believe in the power of God to bring us, a broken people like Israel, to the shores of the Promised Land!
      ellauri164.html on line 890: Many brethren and sisters, not to mention those outside the church, have a wrong understanding of what the sin of Moses was and its implication(s). Often when asked or giving comments on the matter, they say that his sin was in smiting the rock twice instead of once. They think that, since at first God told Moses to take the rod and smite the rock, and the next time He also told him to take the rod, therefore, he was also instructed to strike once. Such an understanding erodes the whole essence that God had designed in the type that would later be seen in the antitype. As it will soon be clear, striking the rock even once [that second time] would have been sin on the part of Moses. In view of this, therefore, it is important for us to possess the true facts on this matter.
      ellauri164.html on line 892: To begin with, we need to know that there were two instances where the children of Israel on their journey to Canaan drank water from the rock. The first was at a place known as Rephidim which would later be called Massah (temptation) and Meribah (strife). The second was at Kadesh. The water here was also called water of Meribah. “This is the water of Meribah; because the children of Israel strove with the LORD, and He was sanctified in them.” Numbers 20:13
      ellauri164.html on line 896: But we know that the Rock from which they drank water is Christ. “And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.” 1 Corinthians 10:4. Psalms 78: 15–16 says “He clave the rocks in the wilderness, and game them drink as out of the great depths. He brought streams also out of the rock, and caused waters to run down like rivers.” Jesus Himself testifies to this by saying, “He that believeth on Me,” as the scriptures say, “out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” John 7:38
      ellauri164.html on line 900: “The smitten rock was a figure of Christ, and through this symbol the most precious spiritual truths are taught. As the life-giving waters flowed from the smitten rock, so from Christ, ‘smitten of God,’ ‘wounded for our transgressions,’ ‘bruised for our iniquities’ (Isaiah 53:4–5), the stream of salvation flows for a lost race. As the rock had been once smitten, so Christ was to be ‘once offered to bear the sins of many.’ Hebrews 9:28.” –Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 411
      ellauri164.html on line 902: Then came the second instance now at a place known as Kadesh. The Children of Israel again murmured for water, against the Lord and His servants, Moses and Aaron. It was this time that the servant(s) of God sinned, having been very faithful in the time past.
      ellauri164.html on line 904: “And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Take the rod, and gather thou the assembly together, thou, and Aaron thy brother, and speak ye unto the rock before their eyes; and it shall give forth His water, and thou shalt bring forth to them water out of the Rock: so thou shalt give the congregation and their beasts drink. And Moses took the rod from before the LORD, as he commanded him. And Moses and Aaron gathered the congregation together before the rock, and he said unto them, Hear now, ye rebels; must we fetch you water out of this rock? And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts also.” Numbers 20:7–12 (emphasis mine).
      ellauri164.html on line 908: “By his rash act Moses took away the force of the lesson that God purposed to teach. The rock, being a symbol of Christ, had been once smitten, as Christ was to be once offered. The second time it was needful only to speak to the rock, as we have only to ask for blessings in the name of Jesus. By the second smiting of the rock the significance of this beautiful figure of Christ was destroyed.” –Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 418
      ellauri164.html on line 912: Of course further to that sin was the sin of anger, i.e. “Hear now, ye rebels” and taking the glory and/or power of God, i.e. “Must we fetch you water out of this rock?” as if they had the power themselves.
      ellauri164.html on line 916: Moses was so beloved by God, but when he sinned He still punished His servant’s sin. “God is no respecter of persons” (Acts 10:34). Yet it is because he repented, and confessed his sin, that God forgave him. Not long after his death he was resurrected and taken up into heaven (Jude 9)
      ellauri164.html on line 918: May the Lord help us not only to understand this truth about Moses’ sin alone, but also possess the true facts of the Bible in every aspect, which comes as a result of prayerful study of His Word, remains my wish and prayer. AMEN.
      ellauri164.html on line 923: Moses’ sin occurred in the final years of his life. After faithfully leading Israel out of Egypt, and after their rebellion in the matter of the 12 spies, he also faithfully led them during the forty years of wandering in the wilderness. Yet near the very end of that wandering, in a moment of anger and a lapse of judgment, Moses sinned, and God recorded that it led Him to refuse to allow Moses to enter the promised land. It is difficult to imagine the anguish and remorse Moses must have felt when God revealed this punishment. His failure to give God the proper respect and reverence, though provoked by the wicked rebellion and faithless murmurings of Israel, was a public sin and God chose to publicly and openly punish him for it.
      ellauri164.html on line 925: Yet this is the same Moses who was allowed to come and speak to Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration. It was the same Moses who received the wonderful testimony that “Moses indeed was faithful in all his house as a servant.” So, it is abundantly clear that God forgave him of this sin and still considered him to be among His greatest servants (Lk. 9:30-31; Heb. 3:5). This makes this event very important as it can bring hope and comfort to us when we have fallen short, and after repentance feel that we are no longer worthy and might still be cast away forever. This event reveals that this cannot happen as long as we repent and seek forgiveness in confession.
      ellauri164.html on line 927: The events leading up to and ending in his sin are recorded in Numbers 20:1-13. The children of Israel were bitterly angry about not having enough water, so “they gathered together against Moses and Aaron,” and “contended with Moses.” They cast all the blame on him. “Why have you brought up the assembly of the LORD into this wilderness,” “why have you made us come up out of Egypt, to bring us to this evil place?” This was part of the murmuring that we are strictly charged not to imitate (1Cor. 10:10). Israel blamed Moses and Aaron for all their problems and bitterly complained and grumbled about it. They were so bitter and angry they wished they were dead. In all previous acts of rebellion, Moses had always conducted himself in a holy and godly manner. He had warned Israel that their murmuring was against God and never took it personally before.
      ellauri164.html on line 929: It appears that Moses was still in complete control of himself when he went to God for instructions. “Moses and Aaron went ... to the door of the tent of meeting, and fell upon their faces.” “Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,” “take the rod; ... gather the congregation together. Speak to the rock before their eyes, and it will yield its water; thus you shall bring water for them out of the rock, and give drink to the congregation and their animals.” Clearly there was nothing difficult to understand and Moses wanted to be as faithful to this command as he had been to all the other commands God had given him.
      ellauri164.html on line 931: Yet somehow this time something was different and Moses became very angry. Unfortunately for him, as is so often the case, “the wrath of man does not produce the righteousness of God.” (Jas. 1:20). Moses went too far. “Moses and Aaron gathered the congregation together before the rock; and he said to them, Hear now, you rebels! Must we bring water for you out of this rock? Then Moses lifted his hand and struck the rock twice with his rod; and water came out abundantly, and the congregation and their animals drank.”
      ellauri164.html on line 933: Did Moses realize immediately what he had done? At some point after this event, “the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron, ‘Because you did not believe Me, to hallow Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land which I have given them.’” Their conduct had publicly displayed a lack faith, reverence and respect. God determined that this needed an equally public punishment. The punishment for this sin was grievous. God gave to them a punishment so similar to the one given to all Israel at Kadesh that it was a heart-breaking moment for Moses. Both he and Aaron would die in the wilderness and not be allowed to enter the promised land. What a bitter pill for Moses to swallow. Like David with Bathsheba, God forgave the sin, but did not remove the consequences. The consequences for Moses’ momentary lapse in reverence and respect under the terrible emotion of anger was to be barred from entrance into the promised land.
      ellauri164.html on line 935: When God said Moses “failed to sanctify me in the eyes of the people,” He did not specify exactly what this failure was. God had told Moses to “speak to the rock,” but the account stated that “Moses lifted up his hand, and smote the rock with his rod twice.” Clearly, in that act, Moses went beyond what God had commanded him to do. God had told Moses to take the staff, but not use it. He was directly commanded only to speak to the rock. He went beyond what was written when struck that rock. It was similar to Nadab and Abihu who offered “strange fire which He had not commanded them.” At that time Moses saw that such behavior did not “treat God as holy or glorify him among the people” (Lev. 10:1-3). Yet Moses, in anger, failed to hallow God when he struck that rock instead of speaking to it. He had failed to learn “not to go beyond what is written,” (1Cor. 4:6). He was told to speak to the rock (and he did not do that), but struck the rock (which he had no authority to do). God later charged Moses with this sin: “you rebelled against my word at the waters of Meribah” (Num 20:24; 27:13).
      ellauri164.html on line 937: There was a second sin that was also committed in that same event. It was not revealed until The Psalmist described it: “it went ill with Moses” because “he spoke rashly with his lips” (Psa 106:33). When we look at what Moses said, we can see exactly how rash he was! “Hear now, ye rebels; shall we bring you forth water out of this rock?” This was a serious lapse in judgment. Moses was not going to bring water out of that rock. So, there was a big problem with that “we.” Hence, first by striking the rock, and second by using a pronoun that elevated them, Moses “believed not in me, to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel.”
      ellauri164.html on line 939: Conclusion. Though the water came, Moses was severely punished. He was punished in a way that no amount of repentance could remove. As noted above, the sin was forgiven, but the consequences of the sin could not be. Because Moses had sinned publicly and God wanting Israel to understand His righteousness, He would not relent. “Then I pleaded with the Lord at that time... I pray, let me cross over and see the good land beyond the Jordan, those pleasant mountains, and Lebanon ... the Lord said to me: ‘Enough of that! Speak no more to Me of this matter.’ ... you shall not cross over this Jordan.” (Deut. 3:23-27). There is a lot of important lessons we can learn from Moses. This sin is one of them. Though Moses had fallen short of God’s glory here, God forgave him. Yet the consequences of the sin were deeply distressing. So it was with David, Paul and Job. So will it be with us. We need to hate sin and realize that the consequences can sometimes be severe.
      ellauri164.html on line 941: “And the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron in Mount Hor by the border of the land of Edom, saying: 24 "Aaron shall be gathered to his people, for he shall not enter the land which I have given to the children of Israel, because you rebelled against My word at the water of Meribah.” (Num. 20:23-25).
      ellauri164.html on line 945: “They angered Him also at the waters of strife, So that it went ill with Moses on account of them; 33 Because they rebelled against His Spirit, So that he spoke rashly with his lips.” (Ps. 106:32-33).
      ellauri164.html on line 947: “Then I pleaded with the Lord at that time, saying: 24 'O Lord God, You have begun to show Your servant Your greatness and Your mighty hand, for what god is there in heaven or on earth who can do anything like Your works and Your mighty deeds? 25 I pray, let me cross over and see the good land beyond the Jordan, those pleasant mountains, and Lebanon.' 26 "But the Lord was angry with me on your account, and would not listen to me. So the Lord said to me: 'Enough of that! Speak no more to Me of this matter. 27 Go up to the top of Pisgah, and lift your eyes toward the west, the north, the south, and the east; behold it with your eyes, for you shall not cross over this Jordan.” (Deut. 3:23-27)
      ellauri164.html on line 955: Everyone knows how Romeo and Juliet ends, and yet we still cry when they die. The same is true of the first of the two Torah portions we read this week, Parashat Hukkat/Balak. In this portion, we learn that Moses will not enter the Promised Land. We have heard or read this story every year, and yet we are still upset, still angry that, on the threshold, Moses is denied admission to the Land to which he has been leading the Israelites for forty years.
      ellauri164.html on line 959: This story takes place during the fortieth and final year of the Israelites’ consignment to the wilderness before entering the Land of Promise. The generation of those who, by their own admission, were not prepared to enter the Land has died off, and only those men who were nineteen years old or younger at the Exodus (and the tribe of Levi) will enter. The only named survivors of the previous generation are the leaders: Miriam, Aaron, Moses, Joshua, and Caleb. Early in this parashah, Miriam dies without explanation, successor, or national mourning.
      ellauri164.html on line 963: But wait. Didn’t we already learn a similar story back in Exodus? In fact, the first story of thirst came very soon after the crossing at the Sea of Reeds (Shemot 17:4). Since that was at the very beginning of the sojourn in the wilderness, before the events that led to God’s decision to delay the Israelites’ entry to the Land—and this story is at the end of the forty years—we can see the two stories as forming a kind of a framework around the whole saga of the wandering. In the first story, the Israelites were the first generation of those who left Egypt. In this story, they are the children and grandchildren of that generation. When we see this kind of framework, we look for the similarities and differences between the bracketing stories. At the same time, we understand that they suggest a theme for the stories between them.
      ellauri164.html on line 965: First the comparison: this generation’s complaint about the lack of water is very different from that of the first generation. Although in both cases the people ask rhetorically why they have been brought out of Egypt, in this case, they bitterly object that in ” . . . this wretched place, a place with no grain or figs or vines or pomegranates. There is not even water to drink!” (Num. 20:5). This is a generation that is ready to enter the Land, and is worried that it will not live to do so.
      ellauri164.html on line 967: Another difference is this: in the earlier story, Moses pleaded for help from God; here, Moses does not say a word. God reacts directly to the people’s complaints. Another bit of evidence that this crisis is unlike other crises is that the word test, which is used in other stories of complaint, does not appear here. These differences signal to us that this story is different from the first one—and therefore Moses’s reaction should be different.
      ellauri164.html on line 969: And here is the clue to what went wrong in this critical story: God says, “You and your brother Aaron take the rod and assemble the community, and before their very eyes order the rock to yield its water. Thus you shall produce water for them from the rock and provide drink for the congregation and their beasts” (Num. 20:7-8). When the time comes, Moses does speak, but what he says is ambiguous in tone and intent. Here is the very short story:
      ellauri164.html on line 971: “Listen, you rebels, shall we get water for you out of this rock?” And Moses raised his hand and struck the rock twice with his rod. Out came water, and the community and their beasts drank. But God said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not trust Me enough to affirm My sanctity before the eyes of the Israelites, even so you shall not bring this assembly to the Land that I have given them.” (Num. 20:10-12)
      ellauri164.html on line 973: In this very short story we see a second framework: the phrase “before the eyes” emphasizes both the importance of what the Israelites witness, and the logical nature of Moses’s punishment. Why is it so important that Moses speak “before the eyes of the Israelites”? To answer that, we need to recall their past.
      ellauri164.html on line 975: The Israelites had a history of trusting in God because of what they saw. The most famous example, which we repeat in the daily morning service, quotes their experience after the crossing of the Sea of Reeds: “Israel saw the wondrous power which God had wielded against the Egyptians, the people feared God; they had faith in God and in God’s servant, Moses” (Exod. 14:31). They have needed this public, indisputable evidence of their eyes ever since. God knows that what they see is what is most important. And what he wants them to see is Moses speaking—not striking the rock, as he was commanded to do on the former occasion.
      ellauri164.html on line 983: And so, although we commiserate with Moses, we understand that his relationship with the people, his repertoire for responding to their needs, and his modus operandi for connecting them with God will not be sufficient for the future.
      ellauri171.html on line 52: Nämä Raamatun vaikutusvaltaiset naiset eivät vaikuttaneet ainoastaan ​​Israelin kansaan vaan myös iankaikkiseen historiaan. Jotkut olivat pyhiä; jotkut olivat roistoja. Jotkut olivat kuningattaria, mutta useimmat olivat tavallisia. Kaikilla oli keskeinen rooli upeassa Raamatun tarinassa. Jokainen nainen toi oman ainutlaatuisen luonteensa tilanteeseensa, ja tästä syystä muistamme häntä edelleen vuosisatoja, ei vuosituhansia myöhemmin.
      ellauri171.html on line 87:

      Jacob declares his love for Rachel. Jaakopin kalukukkaro pilkistää Easaulta förbitystä nahkatakista. Luotathan? Aladdin pikemmin kuin Saladdin.

      ellauri171.html on line 121: Jokebed, Mooseksen biologinen äiti, vaikutti historiaan luovuttamalla sen, mitä hän arvosti eniten, Jumalan tahdolle. Kun egyptiläiset alkoivat tappaa heprealaisten orjien poikasia, Jokebed laittoi Mooseksen vedenpitävään koriin ja syrjäytti sen Niilijoelle.
      ellauri171.html on line 154: Deborah näytteli ainutlaatuista roolia Israelin historiassa, sillä hän toimi ainoana naispuolisena tuomarina laittomana aikana ennen kuin maa sai ensimmäisen kuninkaansa. Tässä miesvaltaisessa kulttuurissa hän pyysi Barak Obama-nimistä mahtavaa soturia apuun voittamaan sortavan kenraali Siseran. Mitä vittua, eikö Jael tehnyt likaisen työn? Missä Jael on? Hei haloo?
      ellauri171.html on line 217: His father, Marcel Théodore Tissot, was not a watchmaker but a successful drapery merchant. He took part in losing the war of 1870 and in the Paris Commune. In 1885, Tissot had a revival of his Catholic faith, which led him to spend the rest of his life making paintings about Biblical events. Many of his artist friends were skeptical about his conversion, as it conveniently coincided with the French Catholic revival, a reaction against the secular attitude of the French Third Republic. They brought Tissot vast wealth and fame. Tissot spent the last years of his life in his chateau working on paintings of subjects from the Old Testament. Although he never completed the series, he exhibited 80 of these paintings in Paris in 1901 and engravings after them were published in 1904. In the first half of the 20th century, there was a re-kindling of interest in his portraits of fashionable ladies and some fifty years later, these were achieving record prices.
      ellauri171.html on line 281:
      Muinaista jalkafetishishmiä ja modernimpaa podofiliaa. Jeesus kazoo Mariaa syrjäsilmällä vaikkei sen T:t ole kovin kummoset.

      ellauri171.html on line 351: Sikhism
      ellauri171.html on line 353: Buddhism
      ellauri171.html on line 380: This story of Abel’s murder is about:
      ellauri171.html on line 388: What’s the story really about? At the time the story of Cain and Abel developed, there was constant friction between farmers and herdsmen, both of them fighting for the limited resources of the land. Cain kills Abel. A herd of goats in a stony, barren landscape The herdsmen were angry when the farmers took over the best land for their crops the farmers were angry when the flocks trampled their crops.This friction leads to violence in which people get killed. Notice that the story was developed by the herdsmen, the keepers of flocks. This explains why Abel, the herdsman, is portrayed as the injured party. Lucky Luke-tarinassa Piikkilankoja preerialla skooparit repi pelihousunsa kun jyväjemmarit pystyttivät piikkilankoja preerialle. Sillä kertaa oli maajussit hyvixiä. Nyt on keskusta taas paha.
      ellauri171.html on line 402: Occasionally they went too far and came a cropper. This is what happened to John.
      ellauri171.html on line 404: Why did Herod hate John? John was highly critical of the ruler of Galilee, Herod Antipas, who had married the divorced wife of his brother. The woman’s name was Herodias, and she had a beautiful daughter Salome. John spoke out loud and clear against the incest that, according to Jewish law, was being committed by Antipas and Herodias. Pentateukin leviraattisäännöt on pirullisia. Enste pitää mennä naimisiin veljen vaimon kanssa, sitten taas ei saa.
      ellauri171.html on line 406: It was a dangerous thing to do. He might have got away with it with Antipas, who was indolent and indecisive, but Herodias was another matter. She engineered a situation that led to John’s death, silencing him forever. Did Herodias do it alone? Probably not. It is more likely that all three (Antipas, Herodias and Salome) planned the charade beforehand, to provide an excuse for getting rid of John and silencing him. In any case John, already in prison, was quickly beheaded. Another political problem was solved. Were it not for the fact that the gospels recorded this deed, John’s name and the horror of his death would have been lost forever.
      ellauri171.html on line 423: This meant a good survival rate for their children. But too many foreign workers can pose a threat. Pharaoh certainly thought so. ‘The Egyptians came to dread the Israelites.’ (Exodus 1:12)
      ellauri171.html on line 424: The problem was made worse by the fact that the Israelites occupied border territory. If there was an invasion, they might defect to the enemy. This could mean the collapse of the Egyptian Empire. Just like the Ukrainians. So off with them. Wait! Pharaoh did not want to eject them from Egypt – they were too valuable as workers. So he sought to control their numbers by forced labour and by child slaughter. Hmm. Mitähän opetuxia tästäkin tarinasta voisi ottaa?
      ellauri171.html on line 427: This plan was thwarted by the Hebrew midwives, including Shiprah and Puah. So Pharaoh ordered instead that every newborn Israelite boy was to be hurled into the Nile waters and left to drown. This solution worked. Except for Moses.
      ellauri171.html on line 429: But the midwives feared God, and did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but let the male children live. So the king of Egypt called the midwives, and said to them, “Why have you done this, and let the male children live?” The midwives said to Pharaoh, “Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women; for they are vigorous and are delivered before the midwife comes to them.”
      ellauri171.html on line 430: Then Pharaoh commanded all his people, “Every son that is born to the Hebrews you shall cast into the Nile, but you shall let every daughter live.” Exodus 1:15-22
      ellauri171.html on line 441: This was when Judith went into action. She went into the enemy camp and offered Holofernes information that would help him defeat her own people.
      ellauri171.html on line 442: He may or may not have believed her, but her beauty made her a sexual fly-trap, and he allowed her to stay. In the ensuring battle of tits, Judith managed to outwit her prey. While he was drunk and had emptied his bollocks into her, she pulled his sword out of its scabbard, prayed to God for strength, hacked Holofernes’ head off, then escaped back to her people.
      ellauri171.html on line 447: She went to the bedpost near Holofernes’ head, and took down his sword that hung there. She came close to his bed, took hold of the hair of his head, and said “Give me strength today, O Lord God of Israel!” Then she struck his neck twice with all her might, and cut off his head.
      ellauri171.html on line 448: Next she rolled his body off the bed and pulled down the canopy from the posts. Soon afterward she went out and gave Holofernes’ head to her maid, who placed it in her food bag.’ Judith 13:6-10
      ellauri171.html on line 456: Fairly soon, Ahaziah died in an accidental fall through a lattice window in his palace (now that’s hard to believe), and was succeeded by his brother Jehoram.
      ellauri171.html on line 457: During this period Jezebel was the powerful Queen Mother, the alpha female of Israel.
      ellauri171.html on line 468: We forgot to mention that Jezebel was the New Testament's N:o 2 whore after Magdalen. In Revelation 2 Jesus Christ rebukes the church of Thyatira saying, “You allow that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, to teach and seduce My servants to commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols”. Christ also says of this Jezebel, “I gave her time to repent of her sexual immorality, and she did not repent. I will kill her children with death.” Battle of the sexes. In Handmaid's Tale, a Jezebel is a woman forced to become prostitute and entertainer. They are available only to the Commanders and to their guests. Offred portrays Jezebels as attractive and educated; they may be unsuitable as handmaids due to temperament. They have been sterilized, a surgery that is forbidden to other women. They operate in unofficial but state-sanctioned brothels, unknown to most women. Jezebels, whose title also comes from the Bible (note Queen Jezebel in the Books of Kings), dress in the remnants of sexualized costumes from "the time before", such as cheerleaders' costumes, school uniforms, and Playboy Bunny costumes. Jezebels can wear make-up, drink alcohol, and socialize with men, but are tightly controlled by the Aunts. When they pass their sexual prime and/or their looks fade, they are discarded, without any precision as to whether they are killed or sent to "the Colonies" (XII Jezebels).
      ellauri171.html on line 501: The young girl Dinah is seized and raped by Shechem. Shechem tries to atone. He falls in love with Dinah and offers to marry her. He also offers compensation to her family. Jacob accepts the young man’s attempt at reconciliation, but his sons do not. They plan to murder Shechem and all the men of the city. Dinah’s brothers massacre the men of the city, including Shechem, and enslave the women and children. Dinah’s fate is unknown.
      ellauri171.html on line 503: Dinah was the daughter of Leah, the unloved wife of the tribal leader Jacob. Jacob had always preferred his other wife Rachel, even though Leah seems to have been a loving wife and gave her husband many children.
      ellauri171.html on line 506: At the time of this story, she must have been very young – about fourteen years, since she was born after Leah’s four sons. Even though young, she was considered to be of marriageable age.
      ellauri171.html on line 510: Women at this time seem to have been relatively free to move around – think of Rachel and Rebecca, who move around in public without any apparent problems.
      ellauri171.html on line 514: But did Shechem take Dinah by force? There is much debate about this. Scholars argue that the words in the Bible text could mean something quite different: that Shechem had intercourse with her without following due procedure, without the correct formalities.
      ellauri171.html on line 516: Because this has not been done, the girl and her family have been humbled, dishonored.
      ellauri171.html on line 518: But Shechem falls passionately in love post coitum! So not at all what happened with Amnon. Dinah must have been a better lay. Now love complicates what would otherwise be the simple story of a violent crime. Shechem declared that he has fallen passionately in love with Dinah. He told her this, and he told anyone who would listen to him. He loved her tenderly – the words of the story imply longing, yearning, tenderness, not the usual feelings of a rapist.
      ellauri171.html on line 520: He has injured her terribly – loss of virginity meant the loss of a future for any young girl. Nevertheless, he now tries to woo her, and he also tells his father Hamor he wished to marry her, and asked his father to help.
      ellauri171.html on line 523: Jacob is told that his daughter has been defiled. The word used to describe the action implies someone who is impure because they have a skin disease, or have touched something dead and are ritually unclean. It does not mean sinful, but it does mean exclusion from the tribe until cleanness is restored.
      ellauri171.html on line 526: Jacob does not send for his sons, but waits for them to come home from the fields. Nothing is said about Jacob’s feelings, or about what he thinks.
      ellauri171.html on line 528: Years later, when his son Joseph is apparently killed by wild animals, Jacob’s grief is terrible: he tears his clothes, wails, refuses to be comforted.
      ellauri171.html on line 529: In this situation however, where his daughter is raped, he is quiet, keeping his counsel until his sons come back. Vitun setämies. Hamor, father of Shechem, arrives at the same time the sons do.
      ellauri171.html on line 533: Hamor tries to placate them by telling them his son loves Dinah, and wants to marry her. Their relationship will be based on loyalty and trust, he implies. He speaks respectfully, and carefully includes the brothers in his discussion, making them a generous offer:
      ellauri171.html on line 537: an invitation to Jacob’s family to settle permanently in the region, acquire property and intermarry with his own people
      ellauri171.html on line 544: After his father has finished speaking, Shechem makes another offer: to give any marriage present they want, if he can marry Dinah. Stacks of Gold Coins! Referring to her, he uses the word ‘maiden’.
      ellauri171.html on line 550: But worse than this in their eyes is the fact that he now seems to be offering to give them financial gain through the rape of their sister.
      ellauri171.html on line 555: There is deep anger in the hearts of Dinah’s brothers, and they want justice, not compensation. They set out to deceive Shechem and his father.
      ellauri171.html on line 557: They ask that Shechem and all the able-bodied men of in his territory, all the men capable of going out to fight in an emergency, be circumcised.
      ellauri171.html on line 560: Shechem agrees. He is the eldest son of his family, next in line to rule the city of Shechem, so all the men the city agree to be circumcised. He does not have to explain the reason for this uncomfortable operation: everyone knows what has happened.
      ellauri171.html on line 564: They know this is the opportune time, since the third day after circumcision is the most painful, and is also the time when a fever is likely. The men of the city will be unable to retaliate. Simeon and Levi kill every able-bodied man in the city, including Shechem and his father Hamor.
      ellauri171.html on line 585: Who was right? Jacob, or his sons? Jacob is angry, as well he might be. He tells Simeon and Levi they have brought trouble on him. Now everyone will hate them and try to kill them.
      ellauri171.html on line 586: His anger is stoked not by any ethical consideration, but by the fear that they have become pariahs who will be hunted down by allies of the city they have attacked. He rebukes his sons for backing out of the agreement they had with the people of the city – but hasn’t he himself used duplicity all his life to get what he wants? He does not like it when his sons do the same.
      ellauri171.html on line 594:
      Confusing pic. What gives? Ah, this is not Jacob's bad boys revenging on the skinned guys but rather the motivating scene, naughty foreigner kidnapping Dinah, giving cause to the subsequent genocide. Figures. Dinah looks a little heavy for Shechem.

      ellauri171.html on line 599: Jacob means ‘he who grabs for something’ – either his brother’s heel at the moment of birth, or his brother’s inheritance later on
      ellauri171.html on line 604: Once a sin is committed, it cannot be undone, no matter how you try. Dinah’s brothers are right about this.
      ellauri171.html on line 609: A Levite man and his concubine (a secondary wife without the legal status of a wife) were traveling through the hill country of Judah. The village they entered seemed unfriendly but they were eventually make welcome by an old man, who let them stay in his house. During the night they they were attacked by some gay villagers who wanted to rape not the woman, but the man.
      ellauri171.html on line 610: The old man who was the Levite’s host offered the men his own daughter instead, as well as the concubine, but the men outside would not listen.
      ellauri171.html on line 612: She managed to crawl back to the door of the house where the Levite, the old man and his daughter sheltered. She lay on the doorstep until morning, when the Levite unlocked the door.
      ellauri171.html on line 615: The story is horrifying. Perhaps worst is the fact that similar stories have recently come out everywhere. This barbarity continues.
      ellauri171.html on line 617: ‘In the morning her master got up, opened the doors of the house, and when he went out to go on his way, there was his concubine lying at the door of the house, with her hands on the threshold. ‘Get up’ he said to her, ‘we are going’. But there was no answer.’ (Judges 19:27-28)
      ellauri171.html on line 622: Why is this story important at all for people without foreskins? In verse 1 we are told that a Levite had taken a concubine, a second class wife, for himself.
      ellauri171.html on line 628: But his concubine played the harlot against him, and she went away from him to her father’s house in Bethlehem in Judah, and was there for a period of four months. Judges 19:2 (NASB)
      ellauri171.html on line 632: Then her husband arose and went after her to speak tenderly to her in order to bring her back, taking with him his servant and a pair of donkeys. So she brought him into her father’s house, and when the girl’s father saw him, he was glad to meet him. His father-in-law, the girl’s father, detained him; and he remained with him three days. So they ate and drank and lodged there. Judges 19:3-4 (NASB)
      ellauri171.html on line 635: Now we learn that the Levite and the concubine are husband and wife because the Levite is described as “her husband,” and the woman’s father is the Levite’s “father-in-law.” We also learn that the Levite travelled to Bethlehem to speak kindly to her and return home together. Because we are told that he planned to “speak tenderly to her,” this once again suggests that they may have argued after she played the prostitute, and as a result she left.
      ellauri171.html on line 637: Verses 4-8 tell us that the Levite remained in the home of the father-in-law for five days. Judges 19:9-15 tells us the Levite and his concubine left the house. They passed by Jebus (Judges 19:11), the ancient name for Jerusalem, and stopped at Gibeah or Ramah to spend the night (Judges 19:13).
      ellauri171.html on line 639: Judges 19:15-26 describes what happened the night the couple stayed in Gibeah, a city of the Benjamites. When they entered the open square of the city an old man invited them to his home (Judges 19:16-21). While the old man and the Levite and his concubine were having dinner, we are told some “worthless fellows” surrounded the house and pounded on the door. Verses 22-24 describe the discussion that occurred with these “worthless fellows.”
      ellauri171.html on line 642: While they were celebrating, behold, the men of the city, certain worthless fellows, surrounded the house, pounding the door; and they spoke to the owner of the house, the old man, saying, “Bring out the man who came into your house that we may have relations with him.” Then the man, the owner of the house, went out to them and said to them, “No, my fellows, please do not act so wickedly; since this man has come into my house, do not commit this act of folly. “ Here is my virgin daughter and his concubine. Please let me bring them out that you may ravish them and do to them whatever you wish. But do not commit such an act of folly against this man.” Judges 19:22-24 (NASB)
      ellauri171.html on line 644: The worthless fellows wanted the old man to send out the Levite so that they could engage in sexual activity with him. But the old man refused and offered the crowd of men his virgin daughter and the Levite’s concubine. The old man said, “you may ravish them” and do “whatever you wish.” He granted them permission to engage in sexual relations with the two women. Now it is obvious the men surrounding the old man’s house wanted to engage in sexual activity when the two women were offered. It is also obvious the men described as “worthless fellows” were homosexuals since they wanted sex with the Levite and two women were offered.[1, 2]
      ellauri171.html on line 646: But the men surrounding the house refused the offer of the women. So the Levite brought his concubine outside and the men raped her all night (Judges 19:25). The Hebrew translated as “raped” is yada. It was commonly used to refer to sexual intercourse. That is, the men raped her all night. At sunrise the concubine lay at the door of the house.
      ellauri171.html on line 648: But the men would not listen to him. So the man seized his concubine and brought her out to them; and they raped her and abused her all night until morning, then let her go at the approach of dawn. As the day began to dawn, the woman came and fell down at the doorway of the man’s house where her master was, until full daylight. Judges 19:25-26 (NASB)
      ellauri171.html on line 652: When her master arose in the morning and opened the doors of the house and went out to go on his way, then behold, his concubine was lying at the doorway of the house with her hands on the threshold. He said to her, “Get up and let us go,” but there was no answer . . . Judges 19:27-28a (NASB)
      ellauri171.html on line 654: Then the Levite took his dead concubine home.
      ellauri171.html on line 656: . . . Then he placed her on the donkey; and the man arose and went to his home. When he entered his house, he took a knife and laid hold of his concubine and cut her in twelve pieces, limb by limb, and sent her throughout the territory of Israel. All who saw it said, “Nothing like this has ever happened or been seen from the day when the sons of Israel came up from the land of Egypt to this day. Consider it, take counsel and speak up!” Judges 19:28b-30 (NASB)
      ellauri171.html on line 658: When he arrived home to the remote part of the hill country of Ephraim, he cut her up into twelve pieces. One piece for each of the twelve tribes was distributed throughout Israel. Finally, we are told that nothing like this had ever happened. So the twelve tribes tried to decide how to respond.
      ellauri171.html on line 659: Judges 20-21 describes the reaction of the tribes of Israel to the horror that occurred in the city of Gibeah, except for those in the tribe of Benjamin. It becomes apparent in Judges 21:1-5 that the Levite had butchered his concubine to send a message to all Israel – a piece of her body for each tribe as a call to action.
      ellauri171.html on line 662: In response, Israel asked God what they should do. In Judges 20:18, 23, 28, 35 God directed them to engage the tribe of Benjamin in battle and defeat them. This reveals that God saw the great sins that had occurred in Gibeah. He directed that the tribe be killed. In fact, in Judges 20:35, 46 we are told God helped Israel destroy 25,100 men of Benjamin. God directed this punishment of the tribe of Benjamin.
      ellauri171.html on line 668: Judges 21:1-7, 13-18 tells us that the Israelites began to feel sorry of the remaining six hundred men from the tribe of Benjamin. Therefore, a plan was created to allow the Benjamite men to abduct one wife from among the virgin daughters of Shiloh of their choosing (Judges 21:20-24) at the feast of the Lord in Shiloh. So when the virgins came out and danced, the men of Benjamin were allowed to “catch his wife from among the daughters of Shiloh” (Judges 21:21).
      ellauri171.html on line 674: Mitä opimme tästä historiallisesta verilöylystä? Pitäisikö tehdä samoin? Ize asiassa opetuxia on vähintään 10, yhtä monta kuin noita murhia!
      ellauri171.html on line 676: The first important lesson from this account is that the Bible indicates God did not approve of the horrible sins that occurred in the city of Gibeah. Judges 20:18, 23, 28, 35 repeatedly reveal that God directed the other tribes of Israel to action against a morally evil tribe. This reveals that the accusation of some that Scripture is silent about the evil that occurred is wrong. The reason the account is recorded is summarized at the end of Judges 21. There God reveals that He condemned the nation of Israel for its actions in Judges 19-21. Judges 21:25 says, “In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.” It reveals what happens when men and women abandon God. Romans 3:10-18 states the human race is utterly perverted and their actions will demonstrate it. It says no one seeks after God. “There is not even one!” We have all turned aside from God. Jesus said to the rich young ruler in Matthew 19:17 that there is only One who is good and He is God. The rest of Romans 3:10-18 describes our utter sinfulness and despicable behavior when we abandon God. That describes the inhabitants of Gibeah and the nation of Benjamin. Tämmöistä sakinhivutusta suositaan armeijoissa nykyäänkin. Jos syyllistä ei saada kiinni, pannaan koko komppania kärsimään. Hemmetti tää on kyllä alkeellista touhua. Kuka tästä enää haluaa mitään oppia? No vizi on että raamatun lukijoista on varmasti yli 50% just yhtä alkeellista porukkaa. Ei apinat ole mihkään muuttuneet, ne on sopeutuneet tähän.
      ellauri171.html on line 678: Our second lesson is that our sins affect others and potentially lead others to sin. The first sin in this account occurred in the home of the Levite and concubine. The fact that the Levite planned to “speak tenderly to her” (Judges 19:3) in order to win her back, seems to imply that they had quarreled. The most obvious sin is that she committed adultery when she became a prostitute. The initial sin cascaded into the horrific evils in Gibeah and subsequently to the 400 virgins who were taken alive in Jabesh-gilead to be given as wives to the remaining men of Benjamin. Judges 21:25 says, “. . . everyone did what was right in his own eyes.”
      ellauri171.html on line 680: This account also reveals that a husband should forgive an unfaithful wife and even pursue her. He was successful in his attempt. He is to be commended for this action, but not for his horrible decision to give her to the filthy homosexuals (or perhaps bi- considering the case) in the city of Gibeah, who raped her all night until she died.
      ellauri171.html on line 684: A fifth lesson is that the account describes what happens when men and women abandon God. Sex and other immoral behavior replace God! The entire story is an example of unrestrained animal lust and human depravity. Total disregard for life occurs. What one desires is all that is important. As Proverbs 30:15 says, “The leech has two daughters, “Give,” “Give” . . . ” Women are less important than men. Men abuse men. Unloving men abusively rule over women. Sex trumps everything else. Why? Judges 21:25 says, “. . . everyone did what was right in his own eyes.”
      ellauri171.html on line 688: Judges 19-21 demonstrates that God is opposed to the abuse of women in this account. He commanded the destruction of an entire tribe because they did not punish those who raped and abused a concubine and caused her to die. Only when she died did they stop! We are told they abused her all night until dawn. Further, they were so morally bankrupt and corrupt that they left her dead at the door of the Levite. Scripture lifts women above the degradation of the Canaanites and the surrounding nations, but the town of Gibeah had become like the Canaanites. God has a higher view of women than described here. That is why He ordered the destruction of the unjust and morally bankrupt tribe of Benjamin.
      ellauri171.html on line 690: Another lesson is that the Levite was supposedly a godly man and priest. The account does not tell us what ultimately happened to him, but Judges 20:4-5 seems to imply that he lied about his actions in order to save himself. Scripture records what appears to be deception. It is not enough for someone to claim to a godly person. It appears that Scripture records he was not fit for the priesthood. Being a pastor or a priest is not a “job” or “vocation.” Some have said that character does not matter. It is what one accomplishes. But Scripture repeatedly demonstrates that God uses righteous ministers! This man’s behavior demonstrated he was not qualified to be a priest.
      ellauri171.html on line 698: Daniel Block writes these words, “The Levite had preferred Gibeah over Jebus to avoid the dangers of Canaanism, only to discover that Canaan had invaded his own world.” Sadly, Canaanism is invading our world and some western countries appear to be far worse than the tribe of Benjamin. They do not even seek the Lord for direction. At least the other eleven tribes sought the Lord and killed tens of thousands more. Jehovah was appeased.
      ellauri171.html on line 703: Sisera, the defeated enemy general in the story of Deborah & Jael, fled from the scene of battle, abandoning his own soldiers in an effort to save his own skin.
      ellauri171.html on line 707: She offered the exhausted soldier some milk to drink, then waited for him to fall into exhausted sleep. Then she took a tent peg and a mallet, stepped quietly to his side, knelt down, then swiftly drove the peg through the side of his skull. He died instantly – an ignominious death at the hands of a woman.
      ellauri171.html on line 708: This woman, called Jael, is praised in poetry and prose as one of the great heroines of the beleaguered Israelites.
      ellauri171.html on line 709: This was Number 8 of Bible Murders: Jael and Sisera. Ancient metal tent pegs! Jael's improvised weapon were ancient metal tent pegs! Can you beat that?
      ellauri171.html on line 712: she struck Sisera a blow, she crushed his head, she shattered and pierced his temple.
      ellauri171.html on line 730: As he passed by her tent, Jael called the unwary Sisera into her tent. He was exhausted and desperate for a refuge. She hid him and fed him, and he fell into a deep sleep. Then she calmly took one of her tent pegs and with one blow hammered it through the side of his head. She was hailed as a national heroine by the Israelites. Sisera’s mother waited and waited for her son to return. But he was already dead by Jael’s hand.
      ellauri171.html on line 740: But Ehud had a plan. As he handed the booty over, he whispered to the king that he has secret information that he could only divulge in private. The king, intrigued, invited Ehud into a private room upstairs. It was a tiny room with a commode toilet for the use of the king and his family.
      ellauri171.html on line 741: Once inside the room with the door firmly closed, Ehud drew out a sword he has strapped to his inside thigh and plunged it into the king’s very fat body.
      ellauri171.html on line 744: He was left-handed. The guards searched for a weapon on his left thigh where a right-handed person would have hidden it. They missed the knife inside his right thigh! Clever! Bible Murders: Ehud murders Eglon. Man's body of about the same proportions as Eglon's. The Bible gives a graphic description of the king’s body. It was so fat that the blade went deep into his belly: it plunged so far in that the hilt went in as well, and the skin closed over it.
      ellauri171.html on line 745: Ehud’s hand was covered in faeces. Then Ehud quickly left, locking the door after him so the servants would think the king was taking his time as he relieved himself.
      ellauri171.html on line 748: ‘Then Ehud reached with his left hand, took the sword from his right thigh, and thrust it into Eglon’s belly; the hilt also went in after the blade, and the fat closed over the blade, for he did not draw the sword out of his belly; and the faeces came out.
      ellauri171.html on line 756: After Jehu killed Jezebel, he rounded up all the family, friends and supporters of the royal family and slaughtered them. Male children were included in this mass murder, since they would one day grow up and perhaps seek revenge.
      ellauri171.html on line 757: There is something particularly cruel about this slaughter of the innocents. It was done by people the boys had grown to trust, but who now hunted them down and killed them violently.
      ellauri171.html on line 759: This barbarism seem to have be common practice in the Middle East, as the Jom Kippur War shows.
      ellauri171.html on line 761: ‘Then Jehu wrote them a second letter, saying “If you are on my side, and if you are ready to obey me, take the heads of your master’s sons and come to me at Jezreel tomorrow at this time.”
      ellauri171.html on line 765: Can't find a pic of this one, but a lot of shots were taken a little later when evil queen Athaliah tried to send the ball back to the other court:
      ellauri171.html on line 772: The lesson: God always wins. That's a pretty simplistic way of saying it, but it's true nonetheless. Even when people like Athaliah try to stomp out an entire family and put an end to God's plan for redemption, when people like the priests of Baal lead others to worship idols instead of the true God, God will always triumph in the end. The negative forces of our culture make us wonder where we're headed as a people. Many of our leaders show little integrity or morality, and dishonesty is overlooked in the workplace. Kindness is often the exception rather than the rule. But don't despair. This is not a battle God plans to lose. In the end, he will prevail! You just wight Enry Jiggins!
      ellauri171.html on line 784: Many Christians are born into poverty, having no choice in the matter. For example, faithful believers who love God and do all His commandments live in the poorer countries of the world. In fact, God has called many poor into His church. James the apostle asked, “Has God not chosen the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those who love Him?” (James 2:5).
      ellauri171.html on line 790: Though Christ never taught it was wrong to have wealth, He did warn about the snare of riches. For example, there was a rich young man who came to Him during His ministry. He asked Jesus what He must do to inherit eternal life. Jesus told Him, “sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me” (Matthew 19:21). As the episode unfolds, the rich young man could not bring himself to do this. He “went away sorrowful, but anyway he had great possessions” (Matthew 19:22).
      ellauri171.html on line 792: At this point, Jesus said to His disciples, “it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 19:23). Hard but not impossible. A camel can be diluted in acid and injected thru a needle. Anyway it was just the name of a gate in Jerusalem. This is because the care of riches in this life can be a snare for a Christian. A Christian’s heart cannot be set on riches and cares of this world above the Kingdom of God. In another example, the parable of the sower, Jesus warned that some who receive the word of God will allow their spiritual growth to be choked off by “the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches” (Matthew 13:22). These things show us that being poor can help a Christian not to be ensnared by such things. No cause to complain then.
      ellauri171.html on line 794: Though Christians may be poor in this world, it is God’s will to "eventually" eliminate poverty. The Bible speaks in much detail of a coming time of peace and prosperity on earth when poverty will be wiped out. It is called the millennium. God the Father has a plan to send His Son back to earth in great power and glory. “He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained” (Acts 17:31).
      ellauri171.html on line 796: Until that day, God is continually searching the hearts of His people to know what is in them. He allows some Christians to be poor, even while other believers have wealth. What a Christian does in each circumstance is important to God. In the book of Revelation, the glorified Jesus Christ said to one of His churches, "I know your… poverty, but you are rich” (Revelation 2:9). That is, these Christians were poor in the wealth of this world, but were rich in faith toward God.
      ellauri171.html on line 798: To another church, Christ said, “you say, ‘I am rich, have become wealthy, and have need of nothing’—and do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked” (Revelation 3:17). These Christians, though rich with material goods of this world were very poor in faith.
      ellauri171.html on line 800: Whether rich or poor in this world, the responsibility of every Christian is to keep the will of God first in their lives. As Jesus said, “one's life does not consist in the abundance of the things he possesses." (Luke 12:15). A zealous Christian who may be poor in the things of this world will be rich in faith toward God. You win some, you lose some. The poor youse shall always have amongst you, so spare a penny for an ex leper.
      ellauri171.html on line 805: Ahabin dynastia omridit eli kuningas Omrin porukat oli jotain kananiittejä. Israel Finkelstein's The Bible Unearthed presents a very different picture of the Omrides than the circumcision handbook, making them responsible for the great empire, magnificent palaces, wealth, and peace in Israel and Judah that the Bible credits to the much earlier kings David and Solomon. According to Finkelstein, the reason for this discrepancy is the religious bias of the Biblical authors against the Omrides for their polytheism, and in particular their support for elements of the Canaanite religion.
      ellauri171.html on line 807: Finkelstein maintains that the writers of the Book of Kings may have omitted possible widespread public construction that both Omri and his son Ahab commissioned during their reigns. Finkelstein and his student Norma Franklin have identified monumental construction at Samaria, Jezreel, Megiddo, and Hazor that is similar in design and build.
      ellauri171.html on line 809: 'Deity' is like god emeritus. A great number of deities in a four-tier hierarchy headed by El and Asherah were worshiped by the followers of the Canaanite religion; this is a detailed listing:
      ellauri171.html on line 922: The Late Bronze Age collapse was a time of societal collapse between c.1200 and 1150 BCE, preceding the Greek Dark Ages. The collapse affected a large area covering much of Southeast Europe, West Asia and North Africa, comprising the overlapping regions of the Near East and Eastern Mediterranean, with Egypt, eastern Libya, the Balkans, the Aegean, Anatolia, and the Caucasus. It was a transition which historians believe was violent, sudden, and culturally disruptive for some Bronze Age civilizations during the 12th century BCE, along with a sharp economic decline of regional powers.
      ellauri171.html on line 928: The last Bronze Age king of Ugarit, Ammurapi (circa 1215 to 1180 BC), was a contemporary of the last known Hittite king, Suppiluliuma II. Ammurapi oli amoriitti kuten esi-isänsä Hammurabi (1792 BC to c. 1750), se Babylonian silmä silmästä, hammas hampaasta kaveri. The exact dates of his reign are unknown. However, a letter by the king is preserved, in which Ammurapi stresses the seriousness of the crisis faced by many Near Eastern states due to attacks (but by whom?). Ammurapi pleads for assistance from the king of Alashiya, highlighting the desperate situation Ugarit faced:
      ellauri171.html on line 934: As for the matter concerning those enemies: people from your country and your own ships did this! And people from your country committed these transgression(s)...I am writing to inform you and protect you. Be aware!
      ellauri171.html on line 947: According to the pantheon, known in Ugarit as 'ilhm (Elohim) or the children of El, supposedly obtained by Philo of Byblos from Sanchuniathon of Berythus (Beirut) the creator was known as Elion, who was the father of the divinities, and in the Greek sources he was married to Beruth (Beirut = the city). This marriage of the divinity with the city would seem to have Biblical parallels too with the stories of the link between Melqart and Tyre; Chemosh and Moab; Tanit and Baal Hammon in Carthage, Yah and Jerusalem.
      ellauri171.html on line 949: The union of El Elyon and his consort Asherah would be representation of primordial Cronos and Rhea in Greek mythology or Roman Saturnus and Ops.
      ellauri171.html on line 951: In Canaanite mythology there were twin mountains Targhizizi and Tharumagi which hold the firmament up above the earth-circling ocean, thereby bounding the earth. W. F. Albright, for example, says that El Shaddai is a derivation of a Semitic stem that appears in the Akkadian shadû ("mountain") and shaddā'û or shaddû'a ("mountain-dweller"), one of the names of Amurru. Philo of Byblos states that Atlas was one of the Elohim, which would clearly fit into the story of El Shaddai as "God of the Mountain(s)". Harriet Lutzky has presented evidence that Shaddai was an attribute of a Semitic goddess, linking the epithet with Hebrew šad "breast" as "the one of the Breast". The idea of two mountains being associated here as the breasts of the Earth, fits into the Canaanite mythology quite well. The ideas of pairs of mountains seem to be quite common in Canaanite mythology (similar to Horeb and Sinai in the Bible). The late period of this cosmology makes it difficult to tell what influences (Roman, Greek, or Hebrew) may have informed Philo's writings.
      ellauri171.html on line 955: Archaeological investigations at the site of Tell es-Safi have found the remains of donkeys, as well as some sheep and goats in Early Bronze Age layers, dating to 4,900 years ago which were imported from Egypt in order to be sacrificed. One of the sacrificial animals, a complete donkey, was found beneath the foundations of a building, leading to speculation this was a 'foundation deposit' placed before the building of a residential house. Me syötiin Kiinan teevuorilla kerran aasikeittoa. Ei se pahaa ollut.
      ellauri171.html on line 975: When Jezebel comes to Israel, she brings her own gods and goddesses—especially Baal and his consort Asherah (Canaanite Astarte, often translated in the Bible as “sacred post”)—with her.
      ellauri171.html on line 977: Jezebel does not accept Ahab’s God, Yahweh. Rather, she leads Ahab to tolerate Baal. This is why she is vilified by the Deuteronomist, whose goal is to stamp out polytheism.
      ellauri171.html on line 980: The extent of Jezebel’s power is evidenced by the necessity for Jehu, the founder of the next royal dynasty in Israel, to murder her before his rule can be established (2 Kings 9:30–37)—plus her whole extended family. Tollasta karhutouhua. The biblical text insists that she is evil through and through.
      ellauri171.html on line 987: But the appearance of Jezebel in the bible includes no mention of her sexuality. In the Hebrew Bible, Jezebel appears in the books of first and second Kings as the wife of King Ahab— the marriage being a political alliance between Israel and Sidon (a coastal city to the north) where Jezebel was the princess. Jezebel brings her religion to Israel with her, and the worship of Baal is blasphemy in the eyes of the biblical writers. According to the text, Jezebel begins killing Israel’s prophets. Because of this, Elijah challenges the prophets of Baal to a showdown with Israel’s deity. The Baal worshipers fail to summon their deity, so Elijah calls upon Yahweh and fire descends from heaven and consumes the altar. Having won, Elijah then slaughters all of the prophets of Baal. Jezebel threatens to kill Elijah by the same time the next day, and, ironically, Elijah retreats.
      ellauri171.html on line 989: The next time we hear of Jezebel is during the ploy to obtain Naboth’s vineyard for her husband, who is unable to secure the transaction. She sends letters, with the stamp of the king, to the elders in Naboth’s town, commanding them to lie against Naboth, and then stone him. The elders do so, and after Naboth’s death, the vineyard is claimed for Ahab. Few bible commentators acknowledge the bizarre betrayal of Naboth by his neighbors. If, as is suggested, Naboth’s neighbors had known him since birth and patronized him, how could they turn so quickly? Some scholars argue that this incident highlights Jezebel’s keen understanding of Israelite men. It is perhaps, also, one of the impetus for her modern connotation as manipulator-supreme.
      ellauri171.html on line 991: The final time we hear of Jezebel (an entire chapter later) is just before her demise. Having just killed the sitting king and son of Jezebel, Jehu enters town to do the same to her. As she sees Jehu, Jezebel stands at the window, issues one last zinger insult, and then puts on makeup. Jehu commands the eunuchs to throw her down, they do so, and Jezebel is trampled. The donning of makeup is the final impetus for her conception as a whore. The most popular interpretation is that Jezebel puts on makeup in effort to seduce Jehu, but this interpretation is not bolstered by the text. Jezebel is the sitting Queen, presumably old in age by now, and has performed in a political function her entire life. She very likely understands that she is about to die and even issues one last insult as Jehu approaches. A more compassionate reading of the text would indicate that Jezebel, for lack of a better term, “goes out with a bang.” Except Jehu hardly banged her If she was an old hag by then.
      ellauri171.html on line 996: In Christian lore, Jezebel’s prominent association is that of a sexual essence. Authoritative sources such Thesaurus and Urban Dictionary return results like “whore,” “harlot,” “slut.” John in his drug dream seems to associate the Biblical queen with the “mother of whores and of abominations” who “rules over the kings of the earth” and who has committed fornication with them (Revelation 17:2, 5, 18).
      ellauri171.html on line 1004: Jezebel pursued Elijah the Prophet as well. Elijah had challenged the false prophets of Baal to produce a tangible response from their deity, during an epic showdown on Mount Carmel. When they failed to do so, the prophets of the Baal were proven false and Elijah had them all killed. Haha! When Jezebel threatened to kill Elijah in retribution, he fled for his life. Fucking murderer and a wimp to boot!
      ellauri171.html on line 1009: The medieval commentators differ on whether Jezebel converted to Judaism in a halachically acceptable manner. R. Levi ben Gershom (Ralbag, 1288-1344) is of the view that Jezebel did not fully embrace Judaism and was not a halachic Jewess. This would mean that her two sons, Ahazia and Jehoram, also lacked Jewish credentials. But his assumption is challenged by the fact that there are indications throughout rabbinic works that Ahazia and Jehoram were regarded as bona-fide halachic Jews. Indeed, this is the position taken by a number of halachic authorities. Some contemporary authors argue instead that Jehoram was the son of another of Ahab’s 100% Jewish wives.
      ellauri171.html on line 1013: Jezebel is characterized as totally evil in the biblical text and beyond it: in the New Testament her name is a generic catchword for a whoring, non-believing female adversary (Revelations 2:20); in Judeo-Christian traditions, she is evil. The Bible is careful not to refer to her as queen. And yet, this is precisely what she seems to have been. Some early Jewish, albeit post-biblical, sources deconstruct the general picture: “Four women exercised government in the world: Jezebel and Athaliah from Israel, Semiramis and Vashti from the [gentile] nations” (in a Jewish Midrash for the Book of Esther, Esther Rabbah)
      ellauri171.html on line 1018: It is not incomprehensible that, whereas Ahab devoted himself to military and foreign affairs, Jezebel acted as his deputy for internal affairs: the Naboth report comes back to her, as if the king’s seal was hers; she has her own “table,” that is her own economic establishment and budget; she has her own “prophets,” probably a religious establishment that she controls. All these point toward an official or semiofficial position that Jezebel held by virtue of her character, her royal origin and connections, her husband’s and later her children’s esteem, and her religious affiliation to the Baal (possibly also Asherah) cult.
      ellauri171.html on line 1023: For more than two thousand years, Jezebel has been saddled with a reputation as the bad girl of the Bible, the wickedest of women. This ancient queen has been denounced as a murderer, prostitute and enemy of God, and her name has been adopted for lingerie lines and World War II missiles alike. But just how depraved was Jezebel?
      ellauri171.html on line 1028: Why would parents name their child Jezebel? Because it’s a pretty name. Just because someone has the same name as someone in the Bible does not mean this is where the inspiration for their name came from. Reality check: not every person is religious. Spanjuunat koittivat kiemurrella että Isabella ei muka ole Iisebel vaan Elishaveta, Aaronin vaimo, Johannes Yökastelijan ja Hyvinkään Kultahatun äiti Iisa taivutustyyppiä kala. Jumala muka vaan putosi pois alusta. Paskanmarjat, samat iisev ja el vaan toisin päin. Jumala on voimasana. Liisa, Betty, Elsa, Iisa, Bella ym.
      ellauri171.html on line 1030: The meaning of Izebel is “My God is a vow”. Keep in mind that many names may have different meanings in other countries and languages, so be careful that the name that you choose doesn’t mean something bad or unpleasant. The history and meaning of the name Izebel is fascinating, learn more about it. This name is not popular in the US, according to Social Security Administration, as there are no popularity data for the name.
      ellauri171.html on line 1033: The name Jezebel is a girl's name of Hebrew origin meaning "not exalted". Jezebel, the wife of King Ahab in the Hebrew Book of Kings, has long had a bad girl reputation. But in the modern secular world, this is somewhat mitigated by the feminist perspective of her as a strong woman, the power behind the throne. Previously avoided as a baby name, Jezebel is now, along with the also previously avoided Delilah and Desiree, coming into use, helped by its relation to other 'bel' names such as Isabel and Bella. The popular feminist celebrity blog Jezebel upped the name's cool factor. Jezebel is the title of one of Bette Davis's best known early films.
      ellauri171.html on line 1039: Wow there are two ladies in the good book called Tamar, Number 1 gets fucked by his father in law in bronze age (1898 BC). Number 2 gets raped by his brother shortly before the first temple (990 BC). Prime material for soap operas and home pornography.
      ellauri171.html on line 1046: Storyline: Jacob's psychopath son Judah believes that his daughter-in-law Tamara 1 has killed two of his sons, and subjugates her so that she is unable to remarry. However, she ultimately tricks Judah into fucking her pregnant himself and therefore secures her place in the family. She gives Judah two more sons. Her story illustrates her loyalty and her willingness to be assertive and unconventional.
      ellauri171.html on line 1048: Judah, who has bought her for his firstborn son, Er, loses it, er, I mean loses Er. When he, er, I mean Er dies, Judah gives Tamar to his second son, Onan, who is to act as levir, a surrogate for his dead brother who would beget a son to continue Er’s lineage. (Onan you must be familiar with first hand!) In this way, Tamar too would be assured a place in the family. Onan, however, would make a considerable economic sacrifice. According to inheritance customs, the estate of Judah, who had three sons, would be divided into four equal parts, with the eldest son acquiring one half and the others one fourth each. A child engendered for Er would inherit at least one fourth and possibly one half (as the son of the firstborn). If Er remained childless, then Judah’s estate would be divided into three, with the eldest, most probably Onan, inheriting two thirds. Onan opts to preserve his financial advantage and does coitus interruptus with Tamar, spilling his semen on the ground. For this, God punishes Onan with death, as God had previously punished Er for doing something equally wicked (unfortunately we are not told what, maybe sodomy in the flock).
      ellauri171.html on line 1050: Although the readers know that God has killed two of Judah’s sons, Judah does not. This is known as dramatic irony. He suspects that Tamar is a “lethal woman,” a woman whose sexual partners are all doomed to die. So, Judah is afraid to give Tamar to his youngest son, Shelah, the inventor of Shelah quantifiers. So doing, Judah wrongs Tamar. According to Near Eastern custom, known from Middle Assyrian laws, if a man has no son over ten years old, he could perform the Levirate marriage (yibbum) obligation himself; if he does not, the woman is declared a “widow,” free to marry again. Judah, who is perhaps afraid of Tamar’s lethal character, could have set her free. But he does not—he sends her to live as “a widow” in her father’s house. Unlike other widows, she cannot remarry and must stay chaste on pain of death. She is in limbo.
      ellauri171.html on line 1052: Ostensibly, Tamar is only waiting for Shelah to grow up and mate with her. But after time passes, she realizes that Judah is not going to effect that union. She therefore devises a plan to secure her own future by tricking her father-in-law into having sex with her. She is not planning incest. A father-in-law may not sleep with his daughter-in-law (Lev 18:15), just as a brother-in-law may not sleep with his sister-in-law (Lev 18:16), but in-law incest rules are suspended for the purpose of the levirate. The levir is, after all, only a surrogate for the dead husband. What the fuck. Well, it takes one to know one.
      ellauri171.html on line 1054: Tamar’s plan is as simple as it is clever: she covers herself with a veil so that Judah won’t recognize her, and then she sits in the roadway at the “entrance to Enaim” (Hebrew petah enayim; literally, “eye-opener”). She has chosen her spot well. Judah will pass as he comes back happy and horny (and maybe tipsy) from a sheep-shearing festival. The veil is not the mark of a prostitute (haha); rather, it simply will prevent Judah from seeing Tamar’s face, and women sitting by the roadway are apparently fair game. So, Judah propositions her, offering to give her a kid (well he did) for her services and giving her his pet seal and staff id (the ancient equivalent of a credit card) in pledge.
      ellauri171.html on line 1056: Judah, a man of honor (buahahaha) tries to pay. His friend Hirah goes looking for her, asking around for the kedeshah in the road (Gen 38:21.). The NRSV translates this as “temple prostitute,” but a kedeshah was not a sacred prostitute; she was a public woman, who might be found along the roadway (as virgins and married women should not be). She could engage in sex, but might also be sought out for lactation, midwifery, and other female concerns. By looking for a kedeshah, Hirah can look for a public woman without revealing Judah’s private life. The woman, of course, is nowhere to be found. Judah, mindful of his public image, calls off the search rather than became a laughingstock. BRUAAHAHAHA!
      ellauri171.html on line 1058: But there is a greater threat to his honor (aw fuck, stop, you're killing us). Rumor relates that Tamar is pregnant and has obviously been faithless to her obligation to Judah to remain chaste. Judah, as the head of the family, acts swiftly to restore his honor, commanding that she be burnt to death. But Tamar has anticipated this danger. She sends his identifying pledge to him, urging him to recognize that its owner is the father. Realizing what has happened, Judah publicly announces Tamar’s innocence. His cryptic phrase, zadekah mimmeni, is often translated “she is more in the right than I” (Gen 38:26), a recognition not only of her innocence, but also of his wrongdoing in not freeing her or performing the levirate. Another possible translation is “she is innocent—it [the child] is from me.” Judah has now performed the levirate (despite himself) and never cohabits with Tamar again. Once she is pregnant, future sex with a late son’s wife would be incestuous.
      ellauri171.html on line 1060: Tamar’s place in the family and Judah’s posterity are secured. She gives birth to twins, Perez and Zerah (Gen 38:29–30; 1 Chr 2:4), thus restoring two sons to Judah, who has lost two. Their birth is reminiscent of the birth of Rebekah’s twin sons, at which Jacob came out holding Esau’s heel (Gen 25:24–26). Perez does him one better. The midwife marks Zerah’s hand with a scarlet cord when it emerges from the womb first, but Perez (whose name means “barrier-breach”) edges his way through. Cuts the queue. From his line would come David. Not surprising.
      ellauri171.html on line 1073: There are few words to describe the awfulness of this story, but let's give it the old college try: dismal, depressing, embarrassing and utterly lacking in any artistic or social worth.
      ellauri171.html on line 1081: This old testament death-feast was initially slated to debut in Midrash. Watching it, you'll wonder why the distributor changed its plans.
      ellauri171.html on line 1097: He lured her to his room and raped her, then refused to marry her. Niin aina. She was disgraced, and never married. Her embittered brother Absalom rebelled against David, but was defeated and killed. Tamar lived out her days in the royal harem getting fucked on and off by the great King.
      ellauri171.html on line 1099: David had a number of wives, but one of the most high-ranking was Maacah, the daughter of King Talmai of the neighboring kingdom of Geshur. Maacah had two children, both of them extraordinarily good-looking. The first was her son Absalom, a favorite of his father’s, the other her daughter Tamar, whose looks stood out even in this family of beautiful children.
      ellauri171.html on line 1101: Tamar probably had a marriage arranged for her when she was still a child – this was the usual procedure for royal princesses. But things did not go to plan.
      ellauri171.html on line 1102: When Tamar reached puberty her half-brother Amnon, David’s eldest son, developed an unnatural obsession with his young half-sister. He watched her, he waited in places where she passed, he could not get enough of her presence, and above all he wanted to possess her.
      ellauri171.html on line 1105: Why not? At that time it would have been a possibility, though not a preferred one. Perhaps the marriage that had been arranged for Tamar was too politically sensitive to upset, or maybe Amnon thought that David would disapprove of his obsession, seeing it as a weakness. After all, a king could not afford to let emotions interfere with politics. Remember Batsheba, haha.
      ellauri171.html on line 1109: In any case, Tamar was out of Amnon’s reach. As a royal princess and a virgin, she was closely watched by the harem eunuchs. She lived in the women’s quarters, and could not go outside its walls unless accompanied by other women and guards. There seemed no opportunity for Amnon to get her alone, let alone into his bedroom.
      ellauri171.html on line 1112: But Amnon was not used to being refused something he wanted. He must have discussed his obsession with a friend of his, a clever cousin called Jonadab, because this young man came up with a plan. They would lure Tamar into Amnon’s room on the pretext that her half-brother was ill, and once they were alone there Amnon could have what he wanted. Bedrooms in ancient mansions were designed to receive guests/visitors.
      ellauri171.html on line 1114: Amnon took to his bed, feigning illness. This caused consternation in the court. The health of a king’s eldest son was no small matter, and David was concerned. The doctors were consulted, and when they could not come up with a cure he visited his son, coming to the room where the young man lay.
      ellauri171.html on line 1116: Amnon sighed in a dispirited way and said he could not eat, but on being pressed by his father admitted that yes, he might be able to eat if his sister Tamar cooked some food and fed it to him. David, gullible in matters regarding his sons, immediately sent for Tamar to come and tend her brother.
      ellauri171.html on line 1122: In a seeming fit of temper he then ordered everyone out of the room, and because he seemed ill and cranky his servants obeyed.
      ellauri171.html on line 1125: When she did this, leaning forward with the food, he took hold of her and pulled her to him, molesting her. Alone and unguarded, she had no chance of fending him off. She resisted him as best she could, she argued and pleaded, pointed out that what he was doing was wrong, that they could marry if he wished, that rape would bring ruin to them both.
      ellauri171.html on line 1129: When Amnon had finished his brutal business, his feelings for Tamar suddenly changed. Now he was revolted by the sight of her, could not bear to look at her, was filled with a loathing far stronger than the lust he had previously felt.
      ellauri171.html on line 1130: He shouted at her to get out of his room, get out of his sight, but she pleaded with him, trying to retrieve something from this desperate situation. They might still marry, she argued.
      ellauri171.html on line 1134: Amnon ignored her words. He was without pity or remorse. He had his servant literally throw her out of the room. He would not even use her name: ‘Put this woman out of my presence, and bolt the door after her.’
      ellauri171.html on line 1136: Outside Tamar collapsed onto the floor, wailing. Nearby were the cooling ashes of the fire she had used to cook his food. She plunged her hand into them and put the ashes onto her disheveled hair.
      ellauri171.html on line 1144: But at the center of this storm stood Tamar, her position as darling of the king and petted princess now destroyed forever.
      ellauri171.html on line 1149: When her brother Absalom found out what had happened he comforted her as best he could, and moved her out of the harem into his own house. Then he went to the King and demanded that Amnon marry his sister – marriage between a half-brother and sister was a possibility in this extreme case, though biblical law prohibited it elsewhere. But for his favorite king David Jehovah was prepared to make an exception.
      ellauri171.html on line 1151: Prince Amnon refused outright to marry her, the callous streak already evident in David now coming out in the son. David was angry, but did nothing to resolve the situation, or even to punish Amnon for what he had done. This was typical of David – he could never chastise his sons even when they deserved it. Instead he did what many people have done when confronted with rape or incest – he protected the abuser rather than the victim, and tried to hush things up.
      ellauri171.html on line 1155: But her brother Absalom was not so accommodating. He could not force Amnon to marry the devastated Tamar, but he would take his revenge – vendetta was part of Near Eastern culture.
      ellauri171.html on line 1157: Absalom waited, biding his time. For two years he said nothing, did nothing, but then he set his trap. He gave a feast for all David’s sons. At the height of the festivities when Amnon was half-drunk, Absalom had his half-brother killed, stabbed to death in a scene reminiscent of a Mafia killing. In the ensuring turmoil Absalom escaped, fleeing for sanctuary to Geshur, his grandfather’s territory.
      ellauri171.html on line 1179: 18 Kun Noomi tajusi, että Ruthista oltiin pääsemättömissä, hän lakkasi kehottamasta häntä. 19 Niin ne kaksi naista jatkoivat matkaansa, kunnes tulivat Betlehemiin. Kun he saapuivat Betlehemiin, koko kaupunki järkyttyi heidän takiaan, ja naiset huusivat: "Voiko tämä olla Noomi?" 20 "Älkää kutsuko minua Naomiksi", hän sanoi heille. "Kutsu minua Maraksi, koska Kaikkivaltias on tehnyt elämästäni hyvin katkeraa. 21 Minä menin pois täynnä, mutta Herra on tuonut minut takaisin tyhjänä. Miksi kutsut minua Naomiksi? HERRA on vaivannut minua; Kaikkivaltias on tuonut minulle onnettomuuden." 22 Niin Noomi palasi Moabista miniänsä Ruutin kanssa, joka saapui Betlehemiin ohran sadonkorjuun alkaessa. 1 Noomilla oli sukulainen miehensä puolella, Elimelekin suvusta kuuluva mies, jonka nimi oli Boas. 2 Ja Moabilainen Ruut sanoi Noomille: "Sallikaa minun mennä pelloille ja poimia yli jääneet viljat jokaisen, jonka silmissä armon saan." Noomi sanoi hänelle: "Mene, tyttäreni." 3 Niin hän meni ulos, meni pellolle ja rupesi poimimaan harvesterien eli puimakoneiden takaa. Kuten kävi ilmi, hän työskenteli pellolla, joka kuului Boasille, joka oli Elimelekin klaanista.
      ellauri171.html on line 1183: 15 Kun hän nousi poimimaan, Boas antoi miehilleen käskyn: "Anna hänen koota lyhteiden sekaan, älkääkä nuhtelko häntä. 16 Jopa vedä hänelle varret nipuista ja jätä ne hänen poimittavaksi, äläkä nuhtele häntä." 17 Ruut poimii kedolla iltaan asti. Sitten hän puinut ohran, jonka hän oli kerännyt, ja se oli noin efaa. 18 Hän vei sen takaisin kaupunkiin, ja hänen anoppinsa näki, kuinka paljon hän oli kerännyt. Ruth toi myös ulos ja antoi hänelle sen, mitä hänellä oli jäänyt yli syötyään tarpeeksi. 19 Hänen anoppinsa kysyi häneltä: "Mistä poimit tänään? Missä olet työskennellyt? Siunattu olkoon mies, joka huomioi sinut!” Sitten Ruth kertoi anoppilleen siitä, jonka luona hän oli työskennellyt. "Sen miehen nimi, jonka kanssa työskentelin tänään, on Boaz", hän sanoi. 20 "Herra siunatkoon häntä!" Naomi sanoi miniälleen. "Hän ei ole lakannut osoittamasta ystävällisyyttään eläville ja kuolleille." Hän lisäsi: "Tuo mies on meidän lähisukulainen; hän on yksi huoltajistamme. 21 Silloin Moabilainen Ruut sanoi: "Hän jopa sanoi minulle: 'Pysy työntekijöideni luona, kunnes he ovat korjanneet kaiken viljani." 22 Noomi sanoi miniälleen Ruutille: "Sinun on hyvä, tyttäreni, mennä niiden naisten kanssa, jotka työskentelevät hänelle, koska jonkun muun alalla sinua saatetaan vahingoittaa." 23 Niin Ruut pysyi Booasin naisten luona poimimassa, kunnes ohran ja vehnän sato oli saatu päätökseen. Ja hän asui anoppinsa kanssa.
      ellauri172.html on line 97: Théodore Agrippa d’Aubigné (1552 Pons, Ranska −1630 Geneve, Sveitsi) oli ranskalainen kirjailija ja aikansa historioitsija, joka kuoli maanpakolaisena. Hän oli maineikas huuakotti. Hänen ystäviään oli Henrik Navarralainen, ja hän oli Madame de Maintenonin isoisä. Pariisin parlamentti määräsi hänen teoksensa Histoire universelle 1550−1601 poltettavaksi. Teos on merkittävä aikalaiskuvaustensa vuoksi. Merkittävin hänen teoksistaan on seitsenosainen runoelma Les Tragiques (1616), jossa hän käsittelee Ranskan tilannetta, uskonvainoja ja Jumalan rangaistuksia. Hän pakeni 1620 Geneveen, jossa kuoli. Kaikesta huolimatta
      ellauri172.html on line 112: Ikävä kyllä tässäkin, niin kuin kaikessa, oli käynyt niin, että pääluvultaan mittaamaton tylsimysten arme ja oli marssinut pyhäkköön ja tietämättömyydellan ja taitamattomuudellaan luhistanut katollisen kielen ankaran jalon ryhdin. Kaiken epäonnen huipuksi mukaan on tuppautunut muutama hurskas rouvashenkilökin, ja joissakin valistumattomissa sakaristoissa ja ymmärtämättömissä salongeissa noiden rouvien viheliäisiä höpötyksiä oli ylistetty ja tervehditty nerouden läpäiseminä hengentuotteina. Sinisukat! Femakot!
      ellauri172.html on line 254: Later writers satirised this view in terms of an ass which, confronted by both food and water, must necessarily die of both hunger and thirst while pondering a decision. Some proponents of hard determinism have granted the unpleasantness of the scenario (not for the donkey, it will end up eating both), but have denied that it illustrates a true paradox, since one does not contradict oneself in suggesting that a man might die between two equally plausible routes of action. For example, in his Ethics, Benedict de Spinoza suggests that a person who dies because he can't decide is an ass, or worse.
      ellauri172.html on line 260: Other writers [who?] have opted to deny the validity of the illustration. A typical [citation needed] counter-argument is that rationality as described in the paradox is so limited as to be a straw man version of the real thing. The idea that a random decision could be made is sometimes used as an attempted justification for faith. The argument is that, like the starving ass, we must make a choice to avoid being frozen in endless doubt. Other counter-arguments exist. [This paragraph was total balderdash, if I may say so.]
      ellauri172.html on line 263: Social Psychologist Kurt Lewin's Field Theory treated this paradox experimentally. He demonstrated that lab rats experience difficulty when choosing between two equally attractive (approach-approach) goals. The typical response to approach-approach decisions is initial ambivalence, though the decision becomes more decisive as the organism moves towards one choice and away from another. [So what? Kurt should repeat the experiment with donkeys.]
      ellauri172.html on line 265: The situation of Buridan's ass was given a mathematical basis in a 1984 paper by American computer scientist Leslie Lamport (LaTex -ladontaskriptikielen kexijä, LOL), in which Lamport presents an argument that, given certain assumptions about continuity in a simple mathematical model of the Buridan's ass problem, there is always some starting condition under which the ass starves to death, no matter what strategy it takes. He points out that just because we do not see people's asses starving to death through indecision, this does not disprove the principle. The persistence of a Buridan's undecided state for the required length of time may just be sufficiently improbable that it has not been observed.
      ellauri172.html on line 281: 21 Balaam got up in the morning, saddled his donkey and went with the Moabite officials. 22 But God was very angry(A) when he went, and the angel of the Lord(B) stood in the road to oppose him. Balaam was riding on his donkey, and his two servants were with him. 23 When the donkey saw the angel of the Lord standing in the road with a drawn sword(C) in his hand, it turned off the road into a field. Balaam beat it(D) to get it back on the road.
      ellauri172.html on line 285: 26 Then the angel of the Lord moved on ahead and stood in a narrow place where there was no room to turn, either to the right or to the left. 27 When the donkey saw the angel of the Lord, it lay down under Balaam, and he was angry(E) and beat it with his staff. 28 Then the Lord opened the donkey’s mouth,(F) and it said to Balaam, “What have I done to you to make you beat me these three times?(G)”
      ellauri172.html on line 289: 30 The donkey said to Balaam, “Am I not your own donkey, which you have always ridden, to this day? Have I been in the habit of doing this to you?”
      ellauri172.html on line 293: 31 Then the Lord opened Balaam’s eyes,(I) and he saw the angel of the Lord standing in the road with his sword drawn. So he bowed low and fell facedown.
      ellauri172.html on line 301: 36 When Balak(L) heard that Balaam was coming, he went out to meet him at the Moabite town on the Arnon(M) border, at the edge of his territory. 37 Balak said to Balaam, “Did I not send you an urgent summons? Why didn’t you come to me? Am I really not able to reward you?”
      ellauri172.html on line 312: Guyau uppfostrades och handleddes i studiet av antiken och Platon av sin styvfar, Alfred Fouillée. Han blev vid 17 års ålder licencié ès lettres och mottog vid 19 års ålder ett pris av Académie des sciences morales et politiques för ett historiskt arbete om nyttomoralen. Ett svårt bröstlidande tvingade honom att avstå från den filosofiska lärarbanan och att tillbringa vintrarna i Nice och Menton, där han avled 33 år gammal. Guyaus arbeten, som utmärker sig för en levande, lyrisk stil, glänsande framställningskonst och kritisk klarsyn, bär av idén om livet som en starkt expansiv, i alla riktningar överströmmande kraft. Etiskt framträder den som sympati, solidaritet och hängivenhet. Därför är också ädelmodet den högsta, i livets eget väsen grundade dygden. Från denna utgångspunkt bekämpar Guyau beräknings- och lyckomoralen i alla dess former. Handlingsprincipen blir: högsta möjliga stegring, intensivt såväl som extensivt, av vårt fysiska och andliga liv. Lusten är därvid ej målet utan följden av livsstegringen. På liknande sätt innebär konsten en livsstegring. Skönt är enligt Guyau allt, som försätter känsla, vilja och tanke i harmoniskt lustbetonad rörelse, griper oss och vidgar vår sympati. Utifrån denna uppfattning tillbakavisas Friedrich Schiller och Herbert Spencers lekteori för konsten. Även i religionen såg Guyau en strävan efter stegrad livsgemenskap. Religionen är för honom en tolkning av verkligheten ur samhälleliga synpunkter, en "sociomorfism". Sehän oli durkheimilainen ennen Eeemeliä.
      ellauri172.html on line 318: Au point de vue physique, nous l’avons vu, c’est un besoin individuel que d’engendrer un autre individu, si bien que cet autre devient comme une condition de nous-même. La vie, comme le feu, ne se conserve qu’en se communiquant. Et cela est vrai de l’intelligence non moins que du corps ; il est aussi impossible de renfermer l’intelligence en soi que la flamme : elle est faite pour rayonner. Même force d’expansion dans la sensibilité : il faut que nous partagions notre joie, il faut que nous partagions notre douleur. C’est tout notre être qui est sociable : la vie ne connaît pas les classifications et les divisions absolues des logiciens et des métaphysiciens : elle ne peut pas être complètement égoïste, quand même elle le voudrait. Nous sommes ouverts de toutes parts, de toutes parts envahissants et envahis. Cela tient à la loi fondamentale que la biologie nous a fournie : La vie n’est pas seulement nutrition, elle est production et fécondité. Vivre, c’est dépenser aussi bien qu’acquérir.
      ellauri172.html on line 508: Eurer Priester summende Gesänge Teidän pappienne sihisevät virret
      ellauri172.html on line 619: Par Dieu ! nous avons tous, Messieurs, connu de ces hommes assez fanatisés d’une femme pour croire en elle, quand tout l’accuse, et qui, au lieu de se venger quand la certitude absolue d’une trahison pénètre dans leur âme, préfèrent s’enfoncer dans leur bonheur lâche, et en tirer, comme une couverture par-dessus leur tête, l’ignominie !
      ellauri172.html on line 637: Eli taas ämmästä tehdään pahis. Niin aina.
      ellauri172.html on line 712: — Est-ce là tout ? — dit Mautravers. — Et si c’est là tout, voilà une fière histoire ! Quelle relation a ton histoire avec tes dévotions à l’église, de l’autre jour ?…
      ellauri172.html on line 769: St. Olaf appears to be a bilingual town with a significant amount of unique vocabulary (that may be specific to the area and not appearing in standard Norwegian). Rose uses these phrases quite often, to the exasperation of her roommates. Examples include Gerkanenaken (when dog feces turn white), Tutenbobels (buttocks), Ugel and Flugel (a Hide and seek game for adults) and Vanskapkaka (a special "friendship" cake; this word, however, is based on the Swedish word "vänskapskaka", which holds the same meaning). German, Swedish and Norwegian is the basis of the
      ellauri172.html on line 781: Kaflügenachen, Scandinavian pejorative term for someone who docks his boat in the handicap slip without a handicap permit.
      ellauri172.html on line 870: L'Envers de l'histoire contemporaine, roman d'Honoré de Balzac, 1848, le personnage de l'abbé de Vèze, qui loge chez Madame de la Chanterie.
      ellauri172.html on line 899: Une histoire sans nom, roman de Jules Barbey d'Aurevilly, (1882), avec l'abbé Riculf, prêtre impie.
      ellauri172.html on line 924: La Puissance et la Gloire, roman de Graham Greene, 1940, avec le personnage du Whisky priest.
      ellauri172.html on line 926: Les Clés du royaume, roman d'Archibald Joseph Cronin, 1941, avec le père Chisholm. Adapté au cinéma en 1944 par John M. Stahl.
      ellauri180.html on line 51: In the books, Elena was popular, selfish and a "mean girl". However, the show's producers, Julie Plec and Kevin Williamson, felt that it wasn't the direction they wanted to go with their heroine in The Young Adult Vampire Diaries television series. Instead, she became a nicer, relatable, and more of "the girl next door" type, until her life gets flipped upside down when she meets the Salvatore Brothers. Stefan Salvatore is a good-hearted and affectionate young adult vampire and the complete opposite of his older brother, Damon Salvatore. Stefan's malevolent young adult vampire brother is mostly thought of as selfish and manipulative, but later on begins to display a more caring side.
      ellauri180.html on line 55: Elena has received mainly positive reviews. Steve West of the Cinema Blend compared the story of The Young Adult Vampire Diaries and the character of Elena to the 10 years older popular vampire franchise, Twilight, and its protagonist Bella Swan. West said "Clearly Elena is way hotter than Bella, she has two immortal young adult vampires fighting over her". (Täähän on jo moneen kertaan nähty: chick litissä tytöllä pitää ollä väh. 2 kosijaa, ei se muuten ole mistään kotoisin.) After the vampire episodes, Elena established her own medical practice, specialising in blood diseases.
      ellauri180.html on line 66: Areenan, Netflixin ja HBO:n tarjontaa selatessa käy selvääkin selvemmäxi että apinoita kiinnostavia genrejä on täsmälleen 3 (ja niiden kombinaatiot): nimittäin EAT! FUCK! ja KILL!. EAT! in alle tulee rags to riches tarinat ja poliittiset valtakähminnät, rikkaiden ylellinen elämä ym ym. paska. FUCK! in alle tulee romcomit ja tragcomit ja ylipäänsä kaikki jonka näpeimmissä kohissa näytetään paljaat pyllyt mielityössä. KILL! on ehkä kaikista lajityypeistä suosituin, eli poliisi ja rikossarjat, thrillerit, sotaleffat, sairaalasarjat, kaikki ne joissa saa kazella verta, mätkintää, suolenpätkiä ja ruumiita. Hyvä pohjanoteeraus EAT! FUCK! kombinaatiosta on Emily in Paris. Äsken kazottu Arsene Lupin sarja on EAT! KILL! kombinaatio, se on kielletty vaan 13-vuotiailta koska siinä ei näytetä heiluvia pyllyjä. FUCK! KILL! kombinaatiota edustaa vaikka se Ridley Road.
      ellauri180.html on line 121: This is the guide to getting your own way.
      ellauri180.html on line 123: This journal will help you envision your ideal life and then identify the unconscious attachments that are preventing you from living it. Through a series of writing prompts and exercises as well as some of Brianna’s favorite quotes, most popular articles, and new passages, it will help you sort through the conflicting thoughts, feelings, and fears that are preventing you from becoming the person you want and need to be. You do not need more motivation or drive to start building the life of your dreams. You need to better understand who you are, why you keep re-creating comfortable pain patterns, and why you may not really want what is it you think you do.
      ellauri180.html on line 125: Read more from Brianna West: The Truth About Everything, This Is For The Women Who Won't Give A Fuck, Never Mind How Nice You Ask, Your Soul Is A River, The Mountain Is You. The Art Of Letting Go, Read This If, It'll be Okay, and You Will Be Too, Don’t F*cking Panic: The Shit They Don’t Tell You in Therapy About Anxiety Disorder, Panic Attacks, & Depression, Your Heart Will Heal, Better Than Happy, Love Some One, You Vibrant Happy Women! Oops, most of these titles are Related Books by other snake-oil saleswomen!
      ellauri180.html on line 148: Hahmo, jota vihasin eniten, oli Candy. Candy on selvästi miehen keksimä hahmo miehille. Hänellä ei näytä olevan muita tunteita kuin hän on avuttomasti kiinnostunut miehistä. Hän ei koskaan vastusta mitään, mitä kukaan tekee, hänen tunteitaan ei koskaan oteta huomioon, paitsi että hän haluaa miehiä eikä voi valita heidän välillään. Kun Homer ottaa raskaana olevan Candyn pois perheestään kestääkseen raskauden ja synnytyksen tuntemattomien ihmisten kanssa, Candy ei näytä välittävän siitä. Hän ei edes jouluna haittaa, että hänet pidetään piilossa isältään, jota hänkin on hyvin läheinen, sekä ystäviltään ja läheiseltä perheeltä. Hän on siellä vain iloisen onnellinen.
      ellauri180.html on line 167: Many historical accounts of circumcision have been written and most authors have used their survey to form an opinion as to whether the neonatal procedure is justified. The weak medical arguments are tempered by the importance of cultural and religious factors. Opponents of the ritual draw attention to the `rights' of the new-born to the skin on their little penises, which, they argue, must be upheld. Others contest that humans are social animals and cannot survive alone; they require their parents, community and culture to thrive, and, as such, `rights' belong to the group, not to the individual. If there is an inherent survival advantage to a group of humans who chose to maim their young, then this is presumably evidenced by their continued survival as a race. In short, to conclude any historical reflection with a reasoned `right' or `wrong', would be like claiming to have fathomed God's will. Consider this; mankind has developed this strange surgical signature that is so pervasive, that in the last five minutes alone, another 120 boys throughout the world have been circumcised. Mikä jättimäinen esinahkakukkula siitä tulisi! Israelista voisi tulla tulevien talvikisojen isäntämaa..
      ellauri180.html on line 171: There has been little written from a statistical standpoint to confirm or deny the popular medical belief that the circumcised are less prone to contract venereal disease. This paper will present a statistical study of the incidence of circumcision in a group free from venereal disease as compared with that of groups with various forms of venereal disease, to determine the influence of circumcision on venereal disease.
      ellauri180.html on line 174: OBJECTIVES: Globally approximately 25% of men are circumcised for religious, cultural, medical, or parental choice reasons. However, controversy surrounds the procedure, and its benefits and risks to health. We review current knowledge of the health benefits and risks associated with male circumcision. METHODS: We have used, where available, previously conducted reviews of the relation between male circumcision and specific outcomes as "benchmarks", and updated them by searching the Medline database for more recent information. RESULTS: There is substantial evidence that circumcision protects males from HIV infection, penile carcinoma, urinary tract infections, and ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases. We could find little scientific evidence of adverse effects on sexual, psychological, or emotional health. Surgical risks associated with circumcision, particularly bleeding, penile injury, and local infection, as well as the consequences of the pain experienced with neonatal circumcision, are valid concerns that require appropriate responses. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of the utility and cost effectiveness of male circumcision as a preventive health measure should, in the light of this information, be research and policy priorities. A decision as to whether to recommend male circumcision in a given society should be based upon an assessment of the risk for and occurrence of the diseases which are associated with the presence of the foreskin, versus the risk of the complications of the procedure. In order for individuals and their families to make an informed decision, they should be provided with the best available evidence regarding the known benefits and risks. And they should also know what God thinks of it.
      ellauri180.html on line 179: Despite an estimated one-sixth of the world's men having been circumcised, it has long been forgotten where or why this most intriguing operation began. The procedure has been performed for religious, cultural and medical reasons, although the last has only become fashionable since the rise of modern surgery in the 19th century. Accordingly, the indications for surgery have surfaced, submerged and altered with the trends of the day. In this review we explore the origins of circumcision, and discuss the techniques and controversies that have evolved since the event has become medicalized.
      ellauri180.html on line 183: In some African tribes, circumcision is performed at birth. In Judaic societies, the ritual is performed on the eighth day after birth, but for Moslems and many of the tribal cultures it is performed in early adult life as a rite of passage', e.g. puberty or marriage. Why the practice evolved is not clear and many theories have been proposed. Nineteenth century historians suggested that the ritual is an ancient form of social control. They conceive that the slitting of a man's penis to cause bleeding and pain is to remind him of the power of the Church, i.e. We have control over your distinction to be a man, your pleasure and your right to reproduce'. The ritual is a warning and the timing dictates who is warned; for the new-born it is the parents who accede to the Church: We mark your son, who belongs to us, not to you'. For the young adolescent, the warning accompanies the aggrandisement of puberty; the time when growing strength give independence, and the rebellion of youth.
      ellauri180.html on line 185: Psychologists have extended this theory to incorporate notions of pain imprinting'. By encoding violence on the brain, child-maternal bonding is interrupted and a sense of betrayal is instilled in the infant; these are considered requisite qualities that enhance the child's ability for survival later in life. Indeed, some components of these psychological theories have recently been tested in prospective clinical trials and there is now evidence that neonates who are circumcised without local anaesthetic do have increased pain responses when 4- and 6-monthly vaccinations are administered.
      ellauri180.html on line 189: There are many other reasons why circumcision may have evolved. Some have suggested that it is a mark of cultural identity, akin to a tattoo or a body piercing. Alternatively, there are reasons to believe that the ritual evolved as a fertility rite. For example, that some tribal cultures apportion seasons' for both the male and female operation, supports the view that circumcision developed as a sacrifice to the gods, an offering in exchange for a good harvest, etc. This would seem reasonable as the penis is clearly inhabited by powers that produce life. Indeed, evidence of a connection with darvests is also found in Nicaragua, where blood from the operations is mixed with maize to be eaten during the ceremony. (Fig. 3). Although the true origins of circumcision will never be known, it is likely that the truth lies in part with all of the theories described.
      ellauri180.html on line 191: Furthermore, was it always doctors who performed the procedure in ancient times? Probably not: in biblical times it was the mother who performed the ceremony on the newborn. Gradually mohels took over; men who had the requisite surgical skill and advanced religious knowledge. After prayer, the mohel circumcised the infant and then blessed the child, a practice little changed today (Fig. 4a-d). In ancient Egyptian society, the procedure was performed by a priest with his thumb-nail (often gold-impregnated) and throughout mediaeval times it appears to have been largely kept in the domain of religious men.
      ellauri180.html on line 198: By the middle of the 19th century, anaesthesia and antisepsis were rapidly changing surgical practice. The first reported circumcision in the surgical accounts of St Bartholomew's Hospital was in 1865; although this comprised only one of the 417 operations performed that year, it was clearly becoming a more common procedure. Indeed, this was a time when surgical cures were being explored for all ails and in 1878 Curling described circumcision as a cure for impotence in men who also had as associated phimosis. Many other surgeons reported circumcision as being beneficial for a diverse range of sexual problems. Walsham (1903) re-iterates the putative association of phimosis with impotence and suggests that it may also predispose to sterility, priapism, excess masturbation and even venereal disease. Warren (1915) adds epilepsy, nocturnal enuresis, night terrors and precocious sexual unrest' to the list of dangers, and this accepted catalogue of phimotic ills' is extended in American textbooks to include other aspects of sexual erethisms' such as homosexuality.
      ellauri180.html on line 200: The turn of the 19th century was also an important time in laying the foundations of surgical technique. Sir Frederick Treves (1903) provides us with a comprehensive account of basic surgical principles that remain today. Like most of his contemporaries, he used scissors to remove the prepuce (fig. 5) and describes ligation of the frenular artery as being mandatory' in the adult. He also warns against the excess removal of skin, as this may lead to chordee.
      ellauri180.html on line 204: More than 2000 years of Jewish persecution has led to the development of alternative surgical procedures. Indeed, `uncircumcision as a measure to offset the oppression of Jews is cited in the Old Testament (I Maccabees 1:14-15) and surgical attempts to restore the prepuce have been well documented throughout history
      ellauri180.html on line 205: Relics of anti-Semitism are evident throughout history and even the statue of Michelangelo's David (a Jew), which was erected in Florence in 1504 was carved uncircumcised.
      ellauri180.html on line 222: `…Your patient C.D., aetat 7 months, has the prepuce with which he was born. You ask me with a note of persuasion in your voice, if it should be excised. Am I to make a decision on scientific grounds, or am I to acquiesce in a rate which took its origin at the behest of that arch-sanitarian Moses?…If you can show good reason why a ritual designed to ease the penalties of concupiscence amidst the sand and flies of the Syrian deserts should be continued in this England, land of clean bed-linen and lesser opportunity, I shall listen to your arguments ……(do you not) understand that Nature does not intend it (the foreskin) to be stretched and retracted in the Temples of the Welfare Centres or ritually removed in the precincts of the operating theatres…'.
      ellauri180.html on line 224: Literary assaults such as these have served to fuel the debates and even a Medline® search today reveals that in the last year alone, 155 reviews or letters have been published arguing for or against routine circumcision. However, studying the evolution of the medical indications provides us with a pleasing demonstration of how controversy drives scientific enquiry. We have already described how the surgeons of 100 years ago advocated circumcision for a wide variety of conditions, such as impotence, nocturnal enuresis, sterility, excess masturbation, night terrors, epilepsy, etc. There can be no doubt that a large element of surgical self-interest drove these claims. However, most of the contemporary textbooks also included epithelioma (carcinoma) of the penis amidst the morass of complications of phimosis. Although rare, once this observation had been made, it presumably filtered down through the textbooks by rote, rather than scientific study. A few reports had appeared in the early 20th century indicating that carcinoma of the penis was rare in circumcised men, but not until the debate over neonatal circumcision erupted in the medical press in the 1930s that this surgical `mantra' was put to the test. In 1932, the editor of the Lancet challenged Abraham Wolbarst, a New York urologist, to prove his contention (in a previous Lancet editorial), that circumcision prevented penile carcinoma. Wolbarst responded by surveying every skin, cancer and Jewish hospital in the USA, along with 1250 of the largest general hospitals throughout the Union. With this survey, he was able to show that penile cancer virtually never occurred in circumcised men and that the risk related to the timing of the circumcision. Over the years this association has been reaffirmed by many research workers, although general hygiene, demographic and other factors such as human papilloma virus and smoking status are probably just as important. However, Wolbarst established that association through formal scientific enquiry and proponents of the procedure continue to use this as a compelling argument for circumcision at birth.
      ellauri180.html on line 226: Almost as an extension to the lack of penile cancer in Jews, Handley reported on the infrequency of carcinoma of the cervix in Jewish women. He suggested that this related to the fact that Jewish men were circumcised. Not surprisingly, this spawned a mass of contradictory studies and over the next 50 years the champions of both camps have sought to establish the importance or irrelevance of circumcision in relation to penile cancer. The pendulum has swung both ways and the current evidence suggests that other factors are probably more important. A similar debate has raged for 50 years over concerns for the risks of urinary tract infections in young boys and currently, any decreased risk associated with circumcision remains tentative but not proven.
      ellauri180.html on line 228: However, during the two World Wars, governments became increasingly interested in reducing the risk of venereal disease amongst their soldiers. Clearly, such pathology can have a profound effect on the efficiency of fighting armis. Indeed, in 1947 the Canadian Army found that whereas 52% of their soldiers had foreskins intact, 77% of those treated for venereal disease were uncircumcised. Persuasive arguments to circumcise all conscripts were proposed. Furthermore, it was an age-old observation, and indigenous African healers had promoted circumcision to prevent the transmission of sexually transmitted disease for centuries. As might be expected, the evidence did not withstand further scientific scrutiny and numerous contradictions were provided. However, there has recently been startling evidence that HIV infection is significantly associated with the uncircumcised status. Indeed, one author has recently suggested routine neonatal circumcision on a world-wide scale as a long-term strategy for the control of AIDS: a whole new chapter opens in this ancient debate!
      ellauri180.html on line 233: However, with a healthcare budget of $140 million per year in the USA (1990), insurance companies eventually forced closer scrutiny. Following such pressure, the first Task Force of Neonatal Circumcision from the American Academy of Pediatrics (1n 1975) concluded that there was no valid medical indication for this procedure. However, the pro-circumcision lobby was strong and the task force was forced to re-evaluate. In 1989, they conceded that there may be certain advantages to neonatal circumcision, although their recommendations did stop short of advising routine operation. Similar pressures in the UK have now resulted in only certain Health Authorities being prepared to pay for the procedure. These tend to be in regions with large ethnic minorities who otherwise may suffer form back street' circumcisions.
      ellauri180.html on line 235: Thus it is clear that medical trends are now being driven by financial constraints. Perhaps this is reflected by the dramatic decline in the number of non-religious circumcisions performed over the last half century; in the USA an estimated 80% of boys were circumcised in 1976 but by 1981 this had fallew to 61%, and recent estimates suggest that this decrease continues. In the UK the decline has been even more dramatic: originally more common in the upper classes, circumcision rates fell from 30% in 1939 to 20% in 1949 and 10% by 1963. By 1975 only 6% of British schoolboys were circumcised and this may well have declined further.
      ellauri180.html on line 375: Robert "Bobby" Pendragon is an everyday athletic junior high school student from (fictional) Stony Brook, Connecticut, located in the greater New York metropolitan area. Bobby is a prisoner of color. Oops sorry my bad he's not, rather he looks a lot like Harry Potter without the spectacles. But his date Lori (whatever) is a WOC. Bobby's Uncle Stop Press reveals that he will train Bobby to become one of the "Travelers": asshole-journeying young warriors from a variety of different planets and cultures. Great Dane threatens to mix them all together like a kid with watercolors until they are all the same shade of shit.
      ellauri180.html on line 382: ‘Porphyria’s Lover’ is one of Browning’s first great poems, written when he was in his early twenties. It is also one of the first great dramatic monologues in English verse, the 1830s being the decade in which Browning and Tennyson developed the genre, penning a series of classic poems which see the poet adopting a persona and ‘staging’ a soliloquy given by an (often unreliable) speaker. Here, the speaker is the titular lover of the girl, Porphyria. Before we proceed to an analysis of ‘Porphyria’s Lover’, here’s a reminder of Browning’s poem. (Se mainittiin Gently-poliisisarjassa yhden koulun pulpettia vasten naidun tupeeratun 60-luvun teinin mielirunona.)
      ellauri180.html on line 434: Only, this time my shoulder bore Paizi tällä kertaa se ei imuttanut,
      ellauri180.html on line 447: In summary: a man speaks to some unidentified (and possibly imaginary) auditor, telling us how, on a dark and stormy (or rainy and windy) night, he waited in his cottage for his lover, Porphyria, to arrive. When she turns up, it’s clear Porphyria is of a higher social class than the male speaker: he’s punching above his weight, as they say. Note how she glides in as if she owns the place, and as if she walks on air rather than on the ground like us mere mortals. She wears a hat, cloak, and shawl, and her gloves are soiled, suggesting that they are not used to slumming it in a common man’s cottage and attending to his fire and grate. The fact that she also takes the lead – suggesting she is perhaps used to ordering servants to do her bidding – further hints at her highborn status: she calls to the speaker, and she takes his arm and puts it around her waist. Then, the clincher (in more ways than one): we are told "she Too weak, for all her heart’s endeavour,
      ellauri180.html on line 450: In other words, her pride, and knowing that she is higher than her lowborn lover on the social scale and so cannot marry him, prevents her from giving herself to him altogether. He is just her ‘bit of rough’, to use the more modern idiom. Calmly, and determined to possess Porphyria utterly, even if it means killing her in order to do so, the speaker strangles Porphyria with her hair, wrapping it around her neck three times and wringing the life from her. In death, she remains forever his.
      ellauri180.html on line 469: Kehittyneen barditeollisuuden avulla Jenkkilä on yhdistänyt nämä 2 mallia, niin että havenotit on saatu samaan aikaan sekä pitämään kiinni kerrostuneen termiittipesän vanhoista meemeistä että uskomaan American dreamiin päästä ize penthousekerroxiin herrahississä kun nalli napsahtaa ja onni sattuu potkaisemaan 2-3 paskaduunissa seppoilevaa izeyrittäjää. Kiitos bardit! Ilman teitä tää ei olis syntynyt, ja ilman räjähdysmäistä kasvua se ei pysyis pystyssä. Nyt on punakone alkanut jo yskähdellä. Kohta koittaa bardi Byronin ennustama pimeys.
      ellauri180.html on line 484: Of this their desolation; and all hearts Tätä autiutta, ja kaikki sydämet
      ellauri180.html on line 514: Came tame and tremulous; and vipers crawl'd Sähisten, mutta ilman myrkkyhampaita -
      ellauri180.html on line 550: Famine had written Fiend. The world was void, Nälkä oli kirjoittanut Pahis. Maailma oli tyhjä,
      ellauri180.html on line 568: This dream can either be brushed off as only that, or considered as a premonition due to the fact that it has a poignant message to share about the state of the human race.
      ellauri180.html on line 575: The worst of it is that all are made equal by this darkness, kings are brought to the level of peasants and all suffer together.
      ellauri180.html on line 577: Men and women (not mentioned) pray for light not for the benefit of mankind, but for themselves, each wishing to retrieve their life as it was before. But this test (not an exam but a scourge, there are no grades) , most likely sent by a (or the) God bringing on the end of days, is not going to be surmounted so easily.
      ellauri180.html on line 583: Quickly this illusion of equality is broken. Guys start eating one another after slaughtering the other creatures around them. Once more the reader gets a small degree of equality in the darkness. The “meagre” in this world are eating the meagre and not the "fat" the meagre as usual. Even those that are most loyal, dogs, “assail’d their masters”.
      ellauri180.html on line 585: The single remaining loyal dog represents the last vestige of good within this world. He refused to turn to the sin that came so easily to the rest of the world, he was not changed (to the worse) by the darkness.
      ellauri180.html on line 589: This act of seeking to find comfort in the burnt remains of religious, or at least holy (privately owned), texts, objects, or structures, after having destroyed them fits into the narrative of this sinful world being reduced to darkness. God (not mentioned) has tested these people and they have failed, only returning to religion when they are at their most desperate. That's an F.
      ellauri180.html on line 592: The speaker has returned to the idea that a force in this world, whether God (or another creator like Chance) has reduced, with purpose (not mentioned) this world to nothing. The perpetrator of the darkness created it in an effort to reestablish some measure of equality in the world, and now the world is even. That's bad, and sad.
      ellauri180.html on line 596: As a child Lord Byron was abandoned and shunned by his parents due to the club foot he was born with, something he would be consistently embarrassed of throughout his life.
      ellauri181.html on line 43: Oliko se sit Ivan Klima? His friend Philip Roth once described him, with his "Beatle haircut" and "carnivorous teeth" as "a much more intellectually evolved Ringo Starr". Ei kuulosta ihan tältäkään. Ivan Klima says "There are some differences between a dictatorship which is strong and one which is tired. By the late Eighties ours was a tired dictatorship. They were no longer killing people and they made every effort not to arrest people. In this condition of a dictatorship you could find your own freedom. You could not become rich, you could not travel except maybe to Hungary, but you could write." Olipa paha ettei voinut rikastua eikä lennellä ympäriinsä. Ja saihan sitä kirjoittaa, kuha ei julkaissut.
      ellauri181.html on line 73: Textianalyysi ja tulkinta Rotpeterin raportti voidaan lukea vertauxena ihmisen heimohistoriasta ja hänen yxilöllisestä sosiaalistumisestaan, koska apinan kokemuxet voidaan siirtää koko ihmislajille. Melankolisen sävyn myötä Kafka näkee ihmisten puutteen - ellei kokonaan - surullisena saavutuxena ja kokonaisuutena hyväxyttävänä kompromissina. Samanaikaisesti hän kuitenkin tekee satiirisia hyökkäyxiä, jotka vetävät ihmisiä alas heidän tärkeydeltään korkealta. Perusmotiivi on melkein maaninen oppiminen (toisinaan viiden opettajan kanssa samanaikaisesti) pääsy toivottomasta tilanteesta samalla kun kieltää omat tarpeet. Tämän edellytyxenä oli tavallisen näkökulman unohtaminen ja kääntäminen. On kuitenkin huomionarvoista, että kaikesta oppimisesta huolimatta apina on silti ensi silmäyxellä muuttumattoman fyysisen ulkonäönsä vuoxi - turkis. Hänen ulkonäönsä suhteen, joka luokittelee hänet selkeimmin apinaluokkaan, hän ei ole koskaan ilmaissut tai pyrkinyt haluun näyttää ihmiseltä, ja tästä hän saa myös oikeuden altistaa izensä sille, mitä ihminen - samoin kuin hänkin - ajattelee. - ei menisi hyvin. Hänen välittömässä läheisyydessä olevat ihmiset saattavat nähdä hänet melkein omana, kuten Hagenbeckin mezästysretken johtaja, jonka kanssa Punainen Pietari on jo tyhjentänyt pullon punaviiniä. Toimittajien muodossa, jota Punainen Pietari halvexivasti kuzuu vinttikoirixi, hän on edelleen koulutettu apina, joka laskee housunsa osoittamaan turkistaan ja arpiaan. Joten vaikka hän on hankkinut ihmisten älyllisen tiedon, hän kiertää sääntöjä riittävälle ihmissuhteelle ja siinä olevien ulkoisten vaikutusten suurelle vaikutuxelle. Historia voidaan nähdä assimilaatioprosessin travestiana ja myös satiirina sivilisaation läsnäolevasta historiasta.
      ellauri181.html on line 75: Ennen kaikkea historia viittaa paineeseen sopeutua, johon juutalaiset olivat joutuneet vuosisatojen ajan selviytyäxeen. Max Brod korosti erityisesti tätä tulkintaa. Hän luonnehti tätä tarinaa nerokkaimmaxi satiirixi juutalaisten assimilaatiossa. Samankaltainen taipumus sisältyy šaakaleihin ja arabeihin. Molemmat proosakappaleet julkaistiin ensimmäisen kerran yhdessä vuonna 1917 Der Jude -lehdessä, ja ne ovat osa Ein Landarzt -nimeä vuodelta 1920.
      ellauri181.html on line 85: Vastaanotto: Sudau (s. 177f.) Korostaa erityistä seikkaa: ”Koko taivaan portti - Kleine Fabel -hiirellä, joka on maailman liian suuri leveys - nurisee yhdessä. Hiirellä ei ole ulospääsyä, vain kohtalokas tulos; apina todellakin löytää ize valizemansa '' ulospääsyn ''. Tällä tavalla Rotpeter seisoo ainutlaatuisella tavalla Kafkan teoxessa: sankari, joka ei mene alle; sankari, joka tietää tarkalleen mitä haluaa ja saavuttaa sen myös! Hänen on kuitenkin unohdettava "tämä suuri vapauden tunne kaikilta puolilta". " Ries (s. 91) huomauttaa, että raportti ennakoi työstä Das Unbehagen in der Kultur by Sigmund Freud , kirjoitettu vuonna 1930 , mikä on tase edistymisestä ja vastoinkäymiset sivilisaation. Kindlerin sanakirja (s. 27) selittää, että raportti on juurtunut syvälle senhetkiseen tieteelliseen-historialliseen tilanteeseen: Kuvaus Brehmin eläinelämästä, Darwinin evoluutioteoria, nykyajan vaihtelevat tapahtumat. TC Boylen romaani Sprich mit mir (2021), jossa simpanssi Sam, joka hallizee viittomakielen, ottaa ajoittain narratiivisen roolin, on muun muassa. innoittamana Kafkan tarina.
      ellauri181.html on line 126: This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
      ellauri181.html on line 127:
      • This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (February 2015)
        ellauri181.html on line 129: This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (February 2015)
        ellauri181.html on line 134: One of the main limitations of this theory lies in the methodology of the research. The SVS is quite difficult to answer, because respondenz have to first read the set of 30 value items and give one value the highest as well as the lowest ranking (0 or −1, depending on whether an item is opposed to their values). Hence, completing one questionnaire takes approximately 12 minutes resulting in a significant amount of only half-filled in forms. Furthermore, many respondenz have a tendency to give the majority of the values a high score, resulting in a skewed responses to the upper end. However, this issue can be mitigated by providing respondenz with an additional filter to evaluate the items they marked with high scores. When administering the Schwartz Value Survey in a coaching setting, respondenz are coached to distinguish between a "must-have" value and a "meaningful" value. A "must-have" value is a value you have acted on or thought about in the previous 24 hours (this value item would receive a score of 6 or 7 on the Schwartz scale). A "meaningful" value is something you have acted on or thought about recently, but not in the previous 24 hours (this value item would receive a score of 5 or less).
        ellauri181.html on line 143: This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful.
        ellauri181.html on line 146: After completing his master's degree in social psychology and group development at Columbia University and completing his rabbinical studies, Schwartz received his Ph.D. in social psychology from the University of Michigan, and subsequently taught in the sociology department of the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and in 1973 became a professor. From 1971-73, Schwartz was a visiting lecturer in the department of psychology at the Hebrew University. In 1979, Schwartz moved to Israel with his wife and three children. He joined the department of psychology at the Hebrew University, where he holds the post of Leon and Clara Sznajderman Professor Emeritus of Psychology. He is now retired, but continues his research activity, as well as developing and promoting his Basic Human Values Theory.
        ellauri181.html on line 148: During the 1970s and 1980s, Schwartz was following the studies of Geert Hofstede about human values and built upon them in his research on pro-social and altruistic behavior. His research has since included studies on the development and consequences of a range of behavioral attitudes and orientations, such as religious belief, political orientation and voting, social group relations, consumer behavior, as well as the conceptualization of human values across cultures.
        ellauri181.html on line 156: Description: Six main features, relevant to all values, are described first. This is followed by an outline of ten basic personal values, with a guide to which are congruent and which conflict. These six features are relevant to all values.
        ellauri181.html on line 164: “Values transcend specific actions and situations. … This feature distinguishes values from norms and attitudes that usually refer to specific actions, objecz, or situations.”
        ellauri181.html on line 208: Relations among these 10 broad personal values are dynamic. Actions pursuing one value “have consequences that conflict with some values but are congruent with others.” This has “practical, psychological, and social consequences.” “Of course, people can and do pursue competing values, but not in a single act. Rather, they do so through different acz, at different times, and in different settings.”
        ellauri181.html on line 210: The figure below provides a quick guide to values that conflict and those that are congruent. There are two bipolar dimensions. One “contrasz ‘openness to change’ and ‘conservation’ values. This dimension captures the conflict between values that emphasize independence of thought, action, and feelings and readiness for change (self-direction, stimulation) and values that emphasize order, self-restriction, preservation of the past, and resistance to change (security, conformity, tradition).”
        ellauri181.html on line 214: “The second dimension contrasz ‘self-enhancement’ and ‘self-transcendence’ values. This dimension captures the conflict between values that emphasize concern for the welfare and interesz of others (universalism, benevolence) and values that emphasize pursuit of one’s own interesz and relative success and dominance over others (power, achievement).”
        ellauri181.html on line 374: In psychology, ipsative measures (/ˈɪpsətɪv/; from Latin: ipse, 'of the self') are those where respondents compare two or more desirable options and pick the one they prefer most. Sometimes called a forced-choice scale, this measure contrasts Likert-type scales in which respondents score—often from 1 to 5—how much they agree with a given statement (see also norm-referenced test).
        ellauri181.html on line 382: Additionally, ipsative measures may be useful in identifying faking. However, ipsative measures may, especially among testing-naïve individuals exhibiting high levels of conscientiousness and/or neuroticism, decrease test validity by discouraging response and/or encouraging non-response. For example, a test's authors may force respondents to choose between "a) Animals chase me in my dreams" and "b) My dreams are nice" in an effort to see whether a given respondent is more inclined toward "faking bad" or toward "faking good." When faced with such a question, a child frequently terrified by nightmares that rarely if ever involve animals, and especially one whose parents have foolishly taught him/her/it strict rules against lying, may simply refuse to answer the question given that for that respondent nearly all of the time both descriptions are inaccurate. Even a previously presented guideline "Choose the answer that [best/better] describes you" may be unhelpful in such a situation to responders who worry that endorsing one item or the other will still involve stating it to be accurate or "well"-descriptive to some positive degree. Only if the guideline is presented as "Choose the answer that more accurately or less inaccurately describes you" and the above-described responder is sophisticated enough to reason out his/her response in terms of "Despite the infrequency with which I have nice dreams, I have them [more frequently / less infrequently] than dreams in which animals chase me" (or, in theory, vice versa) will such a responder be willing to answer the question—and phrasing the guideline in this way bears its own cost of making the question reveal less about the respondent's propensities because the respondent is no longer forced to "fake" one way or another.[citation needed].
        ellauri181.html on line 487: Martti Puohiniemi Stellenboschissa, Etelä-Afrikassa kesällä 2012
        ellauri181.html on line 549: Ben Franklin is an excellent example of a man who defined his virtues and values and aspired to live by them.
        ellauri181.html on line 552: To help us understand what matters most we should consider the story of Benjamin Franklin. (I wonder where the name Franklin Covey � came from? - duh!) Think if you will who Ben Franklin was, but even more importantly, what was his legacy?
        ellauri181.html on line 556: Benjamin Franklin was an author, a painter, an inventor, a father, a politician, and the first American Ambassador to France. He invented bifocals, swim flippers, lightening rods, and the Franklin stove. He founded a public library, a hospital, and insurance company and a fire department. He helped write the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. He wrote an autobiography in the middle of his life and shortly before his death in his 80's, he completed his memoirs. Franklin was truly a Renaissance man. He was one of the greatest citizens and thinkers the world has ever seen. But Franklin was not always a great or successful man. At the age of 17 he ran away from home in Boston, estranged from his family because of an argument he had with his brother.
        ellauri181.html on line 558: Franklin tried in business and failed, not once but twice. He was the father and single parent of an illegitimate son whose mother abandoned the child to Franklin unable and unwilling to live with Franklin and the child. As a young adult Franklin was by almost any measure and especially his own measure a dismal failure. His life was confused, difficult and not at all satisfying to Franklin or to anyone else. He decided to change.
        ellauri181.html on line 560: Benjamin Franklin sat down and made a list. The list consisted of twelve characteristics, values and virtues to which he aspired. He called his list "Virtues". Franklin's list of virtues looked like this.
        ellauri181.html on line 577: When he completed his list of the virtues to which he aspired, Franklin wrote a brief sentence describing each of the virtues and what it meant to him. He did not want there to be any confusion about what each of these words meant. His definitions of his virtues then looked like this.....
        ellauri181.html on line 595: Franklin then took his list to a respected friend who happened to be a Quaker. Franklin explained to his Quaker friend that he, Franklin, was disappointed in the progress in his life to this point and that he intended to turn his life around. From now on Franklin intended to live his life according to his list of virtues. Each day he would read the list and each week he would focus on a different virtue. Repeating the process over and over again until he had become one with his virtues.
        ellauri181.html on line 599: Franklin thought about the advice of his friend and true to the recommendation added a thirteenth virtue.
        ellauri181.html on line 603: Franklin then went on to define humility for his own understanding, and true to his less than humble self Ben Franklin defined humility, thus.
        ellauri181.html on line 608: Not very humble; but true to his word and his intention, Franklin set about to reorder his life. Each day he would read his list and each week he would focus on a different aspect of his list repeating the process over and over and over again.
        ellauri181.html on line 610: The rest is history. Franklin went on to become one of the most productive, successful and self- actualized people in all of history. He knew what mattered most. That was how he could set about being an author, a printer, an inventor, a father, a politician, the first American Ambassador to France, the inventor of bifocals, swim flippers, lightening rods, hundreds of other things and the Franklin stove and how he could found a public library, a hospital, an insurance company and a fire company and help to write the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
        ellauri181.html on line 612: But did you know that is not the end of the story? In his memoirs, shortly before his death Franklin was reflecting on the story of his virtues (which he told in his autobiography written mid-life) and he noted that he had come to feel a oneness with each of his 12 virtues. When he thought of the 13th virtue, he realized that he simply was not humble. Franklin had failed at his 13th virtue.
        ellauri181.html on line 616: Franklin failed at the 13th virtue, Humility. Why? Was the most difficult virtue on this list the last? Or was there another reason? YES! The answer is obvious and simple. Franklin had not failed at his virtues. He had succeeded at each of his twelve virtues. He failed at a virtue that was not his, a virtue that had been given to him by someone else. Franklin failed at a virtue that he did not value. He failed at doing something someone else valued and suggested to him as a value.
        ellauri181.html on line 649: Testosteroni auttaa kortisolia hajoamaan. Tämä oli luolamiehelle edullista, koska jos hän olisi muistanut elävästi, miten kylmä edellisellä mammutinmezästysreissulla oli tai miten ikävästi jalkaan tullutta haavaa särki, hän ei olisi enää lähtenyt mezälle. Kortisolin puuttumisen varjopuolena on, ettei mies pelästy vaaroista tai opi töppäyxistä yhtä herkästi kuin nainen. Tämä voi johtaa toistuvaan hölmöilyyn erityisesti nuorilla miehillä, joiden veren testosteronipitoisuudet ovat huipussaan. Myöhemin isyys näyttää nostavan miehen veren kortisolipitoisuutta puolella, ja avioliitossa eläminen vähentää testosteronin määrää. Psykologian professori Göte Nyman ja sosiaalipsykologi Martti Puohiniemi ovat tutkailleet suomalaisen miehen arvoja, rooleja ja tunteita mainiossa kirjassaan Mies. Heidän mielestään erityisesti nuorille miehille sattuu ja tapahtuu, koska miehen hartain toive on olla rohkein ja paras – jos ei muussa niin edes hölmöilyssä. Kaverit arvostavat Duudson-tarinoiden kertojaa. Testosteroni pitää huolen siitä, että kisailu ja varsinkin voittaminen energisoivat miestä. Nainen kauhistuu tarpeettomien riskien ottamista eikä koe kilpailua rakentavaxi vaan liiallisen kortisolin vuoxi fyysisesti epämiellyttäväxi.
        ellauri181.html on line 669: Aiheesta lisää: Juhana Brotherus, Mitä jokaisen naisen tulisi tietää miehistä (Kirjayhtymä 1984) Jared Diamond, Mixi sexi on hauskaa? (WSOY1998) Marianne Legato, Mixi miehet eivät muista mitään ja naiset liiankin hyvin (Gummerus 2007) Allan ja Barbara Pease, Hormonien sota. Mixi miehet eivät kuuntele eivätkä naiset osaa lukea karttaa (Tammi 2001) Martti Puohiniemi ja Göte Nyman, Mies. Arvot, roolit ja tunteet (Limor 2007) Miehet ovat perseestä naiset anuxesta. Eläköön se pieni ero. Mixi syöminen on hauskaa. Mixi tappaminen on hauskaa.
        ellauri182.html on line 34: hism_seven_masters_scroll.jpg" width="100%" />
        ellauri182.html on line 50: Rei, Shag ja pikkuveli Angus on kaikki ikäviä koleerikkoja. Kylmiöitä paskiaisia. Kaiketikin puolihindu puolisaku Suyata on ize sellainen. Penkkiurheilijana se pahexuu kun Akemi teki olumpiakisoissa ukemin tahalteen. "Eziis edes yrittänyt? Se sai minut jotenkin vihaisexi." Vielä enemmän se on säikähtävinään Akemin lähentelyä. Shag hutaisi sitä puoliunisena turpaan. Se oli oikein sille! Poikaystäväni oli lyönyt minua. Kauhistuttava rajaviiva oli ylitetty. Shiseidon peräpuikko peitti perääni tunkevan stressifinnin. Reistä on tullut huora, tai vähintäänkin kiero ämmä sulasta mustasukkaisuudesta Shagin pikkuveljelle.
        ellauri182.html on line 70: Yoshimoto became an overnight celebrity in the media and “Bananamania” swept Japan and its youth culture. All this took place in the late eighties.
        ellauri182.html on line 74: Mikage Sakurai (“MEE-ka-gee Sah-KOO-rye”), a young woman in Tokyo, is the protagonist and narrator; the story is told from her first-person perspective. Mikage has recently been a student. By this time, she has a job as an assistant at a cooking school. Ruminating on death and loneliness frequently, Mikage says in the beginning, “nobody beats me in my kitchen.”
        ellauri182.html on line 76: Sotaro (“soh-TAH-roh”) is Mikage’s old boyfriend. He is tall, cheerful, and the eldest son of a large family. At one time Mikage loved Sotaro’s “lively frankness,” but his straightforward manners have become “obnoxious.” Sotaro’s aggressive personality bothers Mikage because she “couldn’t keep pace with it.” Sotaro says derogatory things about Yuichi, and informs Mikage that Yuichi has a girlfriend. Sotaro has something in common with Vitali Razumov.
        ellauri182.html on line 78: At Yuichi’s home, Mikage is introduced to Eriko and soon finds out that Yuichi’s mother was once his father; s/he is a transsexual who runs a club of some sort. Eriko is a clear allusion to Banana's daddy. Yuichi hints that s/he has undergone a sex change, when he tells Mikage that s/he has “had everything ‘done.’” There is a hole now where the pecker used to be.
        ellauri182.html on line 80: Eriko (“Eh-REE-koh Tah-NAH-bee”) is Yuichi’s mother, who invites Mikage to stay at his/her home. Eriko is a transsexual and had previously been Yuichi’s father. Mikage’s first impression of Eriko is “overwhelming.” Mikage describes him/her as “an incredibly beautiful wo/man” who “seemed to vibrate with life force.” Eriko represents an ideal of feminine beauty, charm, and strength for Mikage. At times, Mikage finds it hard to believe that this woman had once been a man, or is still a man—some ambiguities over Eriko’s gender remain, both for the reader and for the characters. Yuichi refers to Eriko as both his mother and father, and other characters refer to Eriko as both “she” and “he.” Mikage could easily keep pace with Eriko.
        ellauri182.html on line 87: The second part of the story begins with a shock: Eriko died in the autumn. A man at his/her club has stalked and killed him/xsher in a hate crime. Later that night, alone, Mikage recalls a conversation she had with Eriko, during which Eriko explained why s/he became a woman.
        ellauri182.html on line 94: The 1989 film centers around Mikage, a young woman who loses her parents when young. She grows up in a lonely household with her grandmother who dies when Mikage reaches adulthood. Grief-stricken, she finds solace in the kitchen. Yuichi, a friend of Mikage's deceased grandmother, invites her to live with him and his mother. Then Mikage discovers that Yuichi's mother is actually her cross-dressing father. On the other hand, Mikage realizes that the wealth of gadgetry in Yuichi's kitchen is lovingly detailed... --- Unfortunately, that's all, this film is water under the bridge, overtaken by a 2019 gory crime film of the same name.
        ellauri182.html on line 104: Symbolism appears throughout Yoshimoto’s story. For the protagonist, kitchens symbolize places of contentment, safety, and healing. Mikage claims, “to me a kitchen represents some distant longing engraved on my soul.” When she is despondent, her dreams of kitchens keep her going. She takes to the kitchen and learns cooking as a way of overcoming feelings of meaninglessness and despair; cooking represents her new attitude toward life. Like kitchens and cooking, food also plays a symbolic role in the story. Mikage is constantly presenting her friends with food; her life changes when she takes a job at a cooking school; and the climax of the story occurs when Mikage brings a dish of special food to Yuichi in his secluded hotel room. Eat my shorz.
        ellauri182.html on line 106: Mikage’s voice can be complex as well, which keeps the reader intellectually engaged. She can go from the light and ironic, talking casually about herself and her situation, to the literary and complex, making more formal and generalized statements, such as this musing on fate that begins: “We all believe we can choose our own path from among the many.”
        ellauri182.html on line 110: A few generations ago in Japan, food preparation was considered a lower class occupation; in economically advantaged households, servants frequently provided the cooking. By the mid-1980s, and as reflected in “Kitchen,” food preparation has become a respectable career as well as an art form. Kitchens are now the showcases of Japanese consumer wealth, filled with new technologies and electronic gadgets, and artful cuisine reflects social sophistication.
        ellauri182.html on line 113: The Marshall Plan brought Western ideas and a free market economy to what had been an old and traditional culture. in the mid-1980s, Japan has a booming industrial economy, bolstered by its exports of automobiles and electronics to the West. Japanese society has become more materialistic than ever, influenced by its wealth and the consumerism imported from America. Mikage acknowledges this consumerism when she says of her friends, “these people had a taste for buying new things that verged on the unhealthy.” Mikage’s generation has been brought up on television and American culture; she mentions an American sitcom and Disneyland in her narrative. One character in the story is wearing “what is practically the national costume, a two-piece warmup suit,” a style imported from America. In Japan, Yoshimoto’s generation is called the shinjinrui, a generation that has grown up in a wealthy, technological society exposed to American values. Shinjinrui was new breed of humans (used to refer to the post-war generation, who have different ideals and sensibilities). Japan's Generation X.
        ellauri182.html on line 117: As Mikage and Yuichi’s relationship develops, one of the first signs that they are drawing closer is a shared dream that they experience. In the dream, Yuichi tells Mikage that he has a desire to eat ramen, a noodle soup. Shortly after awakening from the dream, Yuichi, in real life, acknowledges his hunger. “I just woke up and I’m starving. I was thinking, hmm, maybe I’ll make some instant ramen noodles.” Instead of love, she thinks of food. It is through food, as is shown in this scene and many scenes to follow, that Mikage finds her mouth. Climbing to the balcony with her body mass was an existential feat.
        ellauri182.html on line 129: Existential heroes in literature have often been plagued with despair and profound loneliness. Another philosopher that existentialists have turned to is Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855), who called this despair “the sickness unto death.”
        ellauri182.html on line 131: Once again, the existentialist idea appears that personal freedom comes at the expense of going against the mainstream crowd. This relates to existentialism because existential characters tend to focus on the personal rather than the political, and existential characters are alienated by the size and scope of the modern economic system. It is economic liberalism's religion.
        ellauri182.html on line 133: Toward the climax of the story, when Mikage is climbing a hotel balcony in a daring moment of “utter desperation,” she contemplates the concept of free will. Up to this point in the story, Mikage has tended to believe in fate and in premonitions, which are beliefs that other powers are making decisions for her. She has also stated that “we have so little choice,” and that “we live like the lowliest worms.” Undergoing an existential change, Mikage finally admits to herself and the reader that human beings are ultimately free because “we’re constantly making choices. With the breaths we take every day, with the expression in our eyes, with the daily actions we do over and over, we decide.” She states that even when people think that they are being acted upon by outside forces, they are in reality choosing their situations and actions, sometimes subconsciously.
        ellauri182.html on line 136: In Japanese fiction of the seventeenth and eighteenth century, homosexuality was often celebrated for this reason: boys’ love was considered to be purer than the heterosexual kind; it was uncontaminated by the demands of reproduction and other family duties.
        ellauri182.html on line 139: The alternative is of course the sexless intimacy of the fag hag and her chosen friends. The heroines of Yoshimoto’s fiction are not exactly fag hags, nor are they innocent. Mikage and Satsuki are young women. But grown-up sexual relationships are still beyond their grasp. Instead, in the security of their private kitchens, they dream nostalgic dreams, and shed melancholy tears about the passing of time. This is the stuff of great Japanese poetry, and absolute kitsch. Yoshimoto Banana is not yet a mistress of poetry, but she is a past master of kitsch.
        ellauri182.html on line 154: Riitakumppaneita: Kiyoteru Hanada, New Testament scholar Kenzō Tagawa, and his former friend and critic Yutaka Haniya.
        ellauri182.html on line 164: Shin Buddhism is the most widely practiced branch of Buddhism in Japan.
        ellauri182.html on line 166: Jōdo Shinshū (浄土真宗, "Puhdas maa tosi oppi"), also known as Shin Buddhism or True Pure Land Buddhism, is a school of Pure Land Buddhism. It was founded by the former Tendai Japanese monk Shinran.
        ellauri182.html on line 167: Shinran left Mount Hiei to study under Hōnen for the next six years. Hōnen (1133–1212) another ex-Tendai monk, left the tradition in 1175 to found his own sect, the Jōdo-shū or "Pure Land School". From that time on, Shinran considered himself, even after exile, a devout disciple of Hōnen rather than a founder establishing his own, distinct True Pure Land school.
        ellauri182.html on line 169: Nianfo (Chinese: 念佛; pinyin: niànfó, Japanese: 念仏 (ねんぶつ, nenbutsu), Korean: 염불; RR: yeombul, Vietnamese: niệm Phật, "laula Buddha") is a term commonly seen in Pure Land Buddhism. In the context of Pure Land practice, it generally refers to the repetition of the name of Amitābha. It is a translation of Sanskrit buddhānusmṛti (or, "recollection of the Buddha").
        ellauri182.html on line 171: During this period, Hōnen taught the new nembutsu-only practice to many people in Kyoto society and amassed a substantial following but also came under increasing criticism by the Buddhist establishment there. Among his strongest critics was the monk Myōe and the temples of Enryaku-ji and Kōfuku-ji. The latter continued to criticize Hōnen and his followers even after they pledged to behave with good conduct and to not slander other Buddhists.
        ellauri182.html on line 173: In 1207, Hōnen's critics at Kōfuku-ji persuaded Emperor Toba II to forbid Hōnen and his teachings after two of Imperial ladies-in-waiting converted to his practices. Hōnen and his followers, among them Shinran, were forced into exile and four of Hōnen's disciples were executed. Shinran was given a lay name, Yoshizane Fujii, by the authorities but called himself Gutoku "Stubble-headed One (nukkapää)" instead and moved to Echigo Province (today Niigata Prefecture).
        ellauri182.html on line 175: It was during this exile that Shinran cultivated a deeper understanding of his own beliefs based on Hōnen's Pure Land teachings. In 1210 he married Eshinni, the daughter of an Echigo aristocrat. Shinran and Eshinni had several children. His eldest son, Zenran, was alleged to have started a heretical sect of Pure Land Buddhism through claims that he received special teachings from his father. Zenran demanded control of local monto (lay follower groups), but after writing a stern letter of warning, Shinran disowned him in 1256, effectively ending Zenran's legitimacy.
        ellauri182.html on line 176: Some of Shinran's disciples founded their own schools of Shin Buddhism, such as the Bukkaku and Kosovo, in Kyoto. Early Shin Buddhism did not truly flourish until the time of Rennyo (1415–1499), who was 8th in descent from Shinran. Through his charisma and proselytizing, Shin Buddhism was able to amass a greater following and grow in strength.
        ellauri182.html on line 178: Rennyo is generally credited by Shin Buddhists for reversing the stagnation of the early Jōdo Shinshū community, and is considered the "Second Founder" of Jōdo Shinshū. His portrait picture, along with Shinran's, are present on the onanizing (altar) area of most Jōdo Shinshū temples. However, Rennyo has also been criticized by some Shin scholars for his engagement in medieval politics and his alleged divergences from Shinran's original thought.
        ellauri182.html on line 180: In contemporary times, Jōdo Shinshū is one of the most widely followed forms of Buddhism in Japan, although like other schools, it faces challenges from many popular Japanese new religions, or shinshūkyō, which emerged following World War II as well as from the growing secularization and materialism of Japanese society.
        ellauri182.html on line 181: Shin Buddhism (sääribuddhalaisuus) can be understood as a "practiceless practice", for there are no specific acts to be performed such as there are in the "Path of Sages". In Shinran's own words, Shin Buddhism is considered the "Easy Path" because one is not compelled to perform many difficult, and often esoteric, practices in order to attain higher and higher mental states.
        ellauri182.html on line 183: A pure land is the celestial realm of a buddha or bodhisattva in Mahayana Buddhism. The term "pure land" is particular to East Asian Buddhism (Chinese: 淨土; pinyin: Jìngtǔ) and related traditions; in Sanskrit the equivalent concept is called a "buddha-field" (Sanskrit buddhakṣetra). The various traditions that focus on pure lands have been given the nomenclature Pure Land Buddhism. Pure lands are also evident in the literature and traditions of Taoism and Bon.
        ellauri182.html on line 185: Amitābha is the principal buddha in Pure Land Buddhism, a branch of East Asian Buddhism. In Vajrayana Buddhism, Amitābha is known for his longevity attribute, magnetising Western attributes of discernment, pure perception and purification of the aggregates with a deep awareness of emptiness of all phenomena. According to these scriptures, Amitābha possesses infinite merit resulting from good deeds over countless past lives as a bodhisattva named Dharmākara. Amitābha means "Infinite Light", and Amitāyus means "Infinite Life" so Amitābha is also called "The Buddha of Immeasurable Light and Life". Kuulostaa ihan määzhik kortilta.
        ellauri182.html on line 187: As in other Pure Land Buddhist schools, Amitābha is a central focus of the Buddhist practice, and Jōdo Shinshū expresses this devotion through a chanting practice called nembutsu, or "Mindfulness of the Buddha [Amida]". The nembutsu is simply reciting the phrase Namu Amida Butsu ("I take refuge in Amitābha Buddha"). Jōdo Shinshū is not the first school of Buddhism to practice the nembutsu but it is interpreted in a new way according to Shinran. The nembutsu becomes understood as an act that expresses gratitude to Amitābha; furthermore, it is evoked in the practitioner through the power of Amida's unobstructed compassion. Therefore, in Shin Buddhism, the nembutsu is not considered a practice, nor does it generate karmic merit. It is simply an affirmation of one's gratitude. Indeed, given that the nembutsu is the Name, when one utters the Name, that is Amitābha calling to the devotee. This is the essence of the Name-that-calls.[7]
        ellauri182.html on line 188: Note that this is in contrast to the related Jōdo-shū, which promoted a combination of repetition of the nembutsu and devotion to Amitābha as a means to birth in his pure land of Sukhavati.
        ellauri182.html on line 190: In another departure from more traditional Pure Land schools, Shinran advocated that birth in the Pure Land was settled in the midst of life. At the moment one entrusts oneself to Amitābha, one becomes "established in the stage of the truly settled". This is equivalent to the stage of non-retrogression along the bodhisattva path.
        ellauri182.html on line 191: Many Pure Land Buddhist schools in the time of Shinran felt that birth in the Pure Land was a literal rebirth that occurred only upon death, and only after certain preliminary rituals. Elaborate rituals were used to guarantee rebirth in the Pure Land, including a common practice wherein the fingers were tied by strings to a painting or image of Amida Buddha. From the perspective of Jōdo Shinshū such rituals actually betray a lack of trust in Amida Buddha, relying on jiriki ("self-power"), rather than the tariki or "other-power" of Amida Buddha. Such rituals also favor those who could afford the time and energy to practice them or possess the necessary ritual objects—another obstacle for lower-class individuals. For Shinran Shonin, who closely followed the thought of the Chinese monk Tan-luan, the Pure Land is synonymous with nirvana.
        ellauri182.html on line 193: The goal of the Shin path, or at least the practicer's present life, is the attainment of shinjin in the Other Power of Amida. Shinjin is sometimes translated as "faith", but this does not capture the nuances of the term and it is more often simply left untranslated.[8] The receipt of shinjin comes about through the renunciation of self-effort in attaining enlightenment through tariki. Shinjin arises from jinen (自然 naturalness, spontaneous working of the Vow) and cannot be achieved solely through conscious effort. One is letting go of conscious effort in a sense, and simply trusting Amida Buddha, and the nembutsu.
        ellauri182.html on line 195: For Jōdo Shinshū practitioners, shinjin develops over time through "deep hearing" (monpo) of Amitābha's call of the nembutsu. According to Shinran, "to hear" means "that sentient beings, having heard how the Buddha's Vow arose—its origin and fulfillment—are altogether free of doubt."[9] Jinen also describes the way of naturalness whereby Amitābha's infinite light illumines and transforms the deeply rooted karmic evil of countless rebirths into good karma. It is of note that such evil karma is not destroyed but rather transformed: Shin stays within the Mahayana tradition's understanding of śūnyatā and understands that samsara and nirvana are not separate. Once the practitioner's mind is united with Amitābha and Buddha-nature gifted to the practitioner through shinjin, the practitioner attains the state of non-retrogression, whereupon after his death it is claimed he will achieve instantaneous and effortless enlightenment. He will then return to the world as a Bodhisattva, that he may work towards the salvation of all beings.
        ellauri182.html on line 200: What is a word for name-calling? In this page you can discover 11 synonyms, antonyms, idiomatic expressions, and related words for name-calling, like: mad-quite, abusing, Oooooooooh, insult, names, foul-language, insulting, rudeness, bad-language, derogating and white-slavery.
        ellauri182.html on line 209: Cross-national epidemiological studies show that prevalence rates of common mental disorders (i.e. depression, anxiety disorders, and post traumatic ressi) vary considerably between countries, suggesting cultural differences. In order to gather evidence on how culture relates to the aetiology and phenomenology of mental disorders, finding meaningful empirical instruments for capturing the latent (i.e. non-visible) construct of 'culture' is vital. In this review, we suggest using value orientations for this purpose. We focus on Schwartz's value theory, which includes two levels of values: cultural and personal. We identified nine studies on personal values and four studies on cultural values and their relationship with common mental disorders. This relationship was assessed among very heterogeneous cultural groups; however, no consistent correlational pattern occurred. The most compelling evidence suggests that the relationship between personal values and mental disorders is moderated by the cultural context. Hence, assessing mere correlations between personal value orientations and self-reported symptoms of psychopathology, without taking into account the cultural context, does not yield meaningful results. This theoretical review reveals important research gaps: Most studies aimed to explain how values relate to the aetiology of mental disorders, whereas the question of phenomenology was largely neglected. Moreover, all included studies used Western instruments for assessing mental disorders, which may not capture culturally-specific phenomena of mental distress. Finding systematic relationships between values and mental disorders may contribute to making more informed hypotheses about how psychopathology is expressed under different cultural circumstances, and how to culturally adapt psychological interventions.
        ellauri182.html on line 220: Esim. enkelit mainitaan vain runojen kohdalla, mutta kyllähän niistä on proosateoxiakin, esim. Knasulla. Äitiys löytyy vain proosasta, mutta nähtiinhän siitä hiljan 1 japsuleffakin. Juu ei tähän ole luottamista enempää kuin kevätjäihin. Ja taaskin puuttuu listoilta ihan keskeisimmät teemat, nimittäin syöminen, bylsintä ja tappaminen. Edes niinkään keskeistä teemaa kuon omistaminen ei mainita. Rikos on vain leffateema, pace Dostojevski. Murhista on vaan izemurha mainittu (leffoissa).
        ellauri182.html on line 413: Kaikista spirituaalisista pöllöilyistä pahimmasta päästä on zen-buddhismi. Istutaan jalat puutuneina zazen-asennossa pidätellen pieruja, räkämunkkien räimiessä väärin mumisseita selkään kepeillä. Puhdasta sadomasokismia, anaalis-retentiivistä riisisopan keittoa ja moottoripyörän kromiosien kiillottelua. Tässä pieni maistipala:
        ellauri182.html on line 419: The Zen circle is a simple, stark black circle usually painted on white paper in ink. Typically the circle is said to represent the material world that continues endlessly without cessation. There is a beginning to life (where the brush first touches the paper) and an end (where the brush leaves the paper), but this beginning and end continue one after the other, thereby signifying the wheel of birth, death and rebirth. The space within that circle is the emptiness, or the void, the understanding of which lies at the heart of Zen and the experience of which is the goal of meditation.
        ellauri182.html on line 443: What is inside is outside; what is outside is inside. Think about a Möbius strip, or a Klein bottle. No way for a fart to stay inside. As within, so without. This ancient wisdom is as applicable today as it was centuries ago. Make a positive change within yourself and see that positivity reflected back at you by the people around you and the circumstances you find yourself in.
        ellauri182.html on line 452:
        Touhosu! This is the enlightened mind. The mind that is beyond duality. Limitless and formless. Infinite.

        ellauri183.html on line 40: Tän perustavanlaatuisen blasfemian rinnalla atheisti Rothin kiekuna on typerää teineilyä. Silti jutkut hermostuivat Rothista paljon enemmän kuin tästä, koska Roth mustas niiden mielestä juutalaisten mainetta. Siihen verrattuna tällänen suht sexitön (jos apinan pikapanoa ei lasketa) jumalanpilkka vähän niinkuin kotioloissa on varsin harmitonta.
        ellauri183.html on line 50: Malamuutti piti leffoista ja kertoi kavereille niiden juonia. He was especially fond of Charlie Chaplin's comedies. Silläkin oli hullu veli Sakari. Malamud's mother, Bertha, and his brother, Eugene, were both mentally ill. Bertha died when Bernard was 15, possibly a suicide. Sakari eli kovan ja yxinäisen elämän ja kuoli viisikymppisenä.
        ellauri183.html on line 76: Loppuikänsä Bernad opetti luovaa kirjoittamista Vermontissa Benningtonin naisten collegessa. Ann joka oli sentään käynyt Cornellin typed his manuscripz and reviewed his writing. Oliko Berniellä sillä aikaa jimbajambaa coedien hameissa? New York Times tietäisi muttei kerro ilmaisexi. In the book The Natural by Bernard Malamud the main character Roy Hobbs had a very distinct flaw, a flaw that millions of American men and women both have..... an obsession with sex which affected his character and which made him a very unsuccessful man.
        ellauri183.html on line 78: His deep belief that one should live morally crashed into his premise that one should live fully. Yep, I bet he did shag his coeds. Janna Malamud Smith is the author of An Absorbing Errand: How Artisz and Crafzmen Make Their Way to Mastery; A Potent Spell: Mother Love and the Power of Fear; and Private Matters: In Defense of the Personal Life. Her titles have been New York Times Notable Boox and A Potent Spell was a Barnes and Noble "Discover Great New Writers" pick. She has written for the New York Times, the Boston Globe, and the Threepenny Review, among other publications. A practicing psychotherapist, she lives with her husband and two children in Massachusetz.
        ellauri183.html on line 80: Faulty interpretations can create much disappointment, as in the movie version of his novel The Fixer, "Horrible. That thing went to five different writers. Edward Albee was one of them but he would only do it if he had full say over it. Dalton Trumbo finally wrote the screen play and he's a hack. The film should have been done as a sort of fable, in black and white. Instead, it was all galloping Cossacx and dancing girls: an overdone fake. And that sickens a writer--to see his book faked."
        ellauri183.html on line 86: In a 1974 New York Review of Boox essay, Roth took on Malamud, his friend and literary father-figure, criticizing him for creating characters that were suffering Jews, virtuous victims, full of “righteousness and restraint,” lacking their stereotypical “libidinous or aggressive activities.” Though he didn’t use the phrase, Malamud had painted them as Christ-like in their poverty, pain, moral goodness, and quest for redemption. By contrast, the Christian characters, like Frank Alpine, were full of sexual lust and transgressive behavior — the bad goy to Morris Bober’s good Jew. “The Assistant,” Roth wrote, was a book of “stern morality.”
        ellauri183.html on line 88: Roth contrasted Malamud’s protagonisz to the exuberant Jewish characters created by Saul Bellow, especially the picaresque Augie March, and his own hypersexual Alexander Portnoy. In effect, Roth said, Malamud had created Jews who were stereotypes, not fully realized human beings like him and Sal.
        ellauri183.html on line 90: Malamud was stunned. He drafted two letters to Roth, refuting his argumenz, but never sent them, according to a Malamud biography by Philip Davis. Instead, Malamud mailed only a few words to Roth: “It’s your problem.”
        ellauri183.html on line 93: Little wonder that Malamud refused to talk to Roth for several years. They were reconciled in May 1978, when Malamud and his wife, Ann, accepted a dinner invitation in London from Roth and Claire Bloom, who were then living together. The two men kissed on the lips like Brezhnev and Honecker and resumed their friendship, according to a memoir by Malamud’s daughter, Janna Malamud Smith.
        ellauri183.html on line 94: However, in a letter to his daughter a week after that dinner of reconciliation, Malamud voiced his true feelings: Roth, he said, had written a “foolish egoistic essay about my work” and had “certainly misinterpreted” “The Assistant.” The letter was not made public until 2006, some 20 years after Malamud’s death.
        ellauri183.html on line 101: The apocalyptic gloom of his subject seems hopelessly out of place in this cheery, sun-washed house, a rambling white-frame idyll near Bennington College, where Malamud has taught for 20 years. A comforting percussion of cooking sounds comes from the big kitchen where his wife Ann, a chipper dynamo of a woman, is devising lunch; on the porch an old tiger tomcat lolls ingratiatingly; and in the distance the cloud-dappled foothills of the Green Mountains hover like a Yankee daydream.
        ellauri183.html on line 103: And Malamud himself -- still frail from a recent illness -- at first appears an improbable Isaiah. With his tidy demeanor, incessant self-editing ("no, wait, there's a better word . . . ") and deadpan, scrupulous style, he could be the most successful publican in Galilee. He is uneasy with talking about himself ("that kind of stuff, it's not up his alley," says his publicity-hungry "friend" Philip Roth) and seems reluctant to start. He pauses to choose among several pairs of glasses, then sits down carefully, feet flat on the floor, long fingers knitted in his lap. Finally, with the anxious geniality of a brave man settling in for root canals, he says, "Now then, I think we can begin."
        ellauri183.html on line 105: "One of the earliest letters I got was from a Jewish gentleman who wrote, 'Your father must be whirling in his grave!'" His father was a Yiddish-speaking Russian immigrant who had a small grocery store in Brooklyn.
        ellauri183.html on line 107: He forbade television in the house until the late '50s to encourage Paul and Janna to read. And he set an example of "incredible and absolutely consistent discipline," reading every night in his slow, methodical way, underlining frequently. He doesn't prize material things all that highly, and the center of his life has always been his family and friends.
        ellauri183.html on line 108: Malamud's work is infused with a baleful but robust humor, and the son says his father "has a Swiftian streak in him" which leads to the "kind of acerbic, satirical quality" apparent in "God's Grace."
        ellauri183.html on line 109: In Malamud's cosmology, free will and an omnipotent deity coexist because God ("who invented man to perfect himself") has an overall plan "to make man meet his obligations, but in a way he can't tell him about in advance -- to make him use himself best."
        ellauri183.html on line 110: Toisin sanoen: vapaa tahto on kyberneettinen versio determinismistä, siis Ilkka Niiniluodon suotta pilkkaama Ahmavaaran korkkiruuvi! "That's how an inventive god earns his living. I can't outguess my characters all the time, although I know I try. But when I get a character to surprise me, then I know I'm cooking with gas."
        ellauri183.html on line 134: Venezia kauppiaassa on joku Jessica. Niin se oli se juutalainen misu, Shylockin tytär. In the play, she elopes with Lorenzo, a penniless Christian, and a chest of her father's money, eventually ending up in Portia and Bassanio's household. In the play's dramatic structure, Jessica is a minor but pivotal role. Her actions motivate Shylock's vengeful insistence on his "pound of flesh" from Antonio; her relationships with Lorenzo and Shylock serves as a mirror and contrast to Portia's with Bassanio and with her father; her conversion to Christianity is the end of Shylock's line's adherence to the Jewish faith.
        ellauri183.html on line 162: Kierkegaard predicted that his 1843 work Fear and Trembling would be translated into many different languages, and would secure iz author's place in history. He was right. But Fear and Trembling has also led to an enduring caricature of Kierkegaard as advocating a dangerously irrational and individualistic form of religious faith.
        ellauri183.html on line 164: The book is written under a pseudonym, Johannes de silentio, who discusses the biblical story of Abraham's obedient response to God's command to sacrifice his only son, Isaac. Largely on the basis of this story, Abraham has come to be regarded within the Judeo-Christian tradition as the "father of faith". Reflecting on Abraham's willingness to kill his own son therefore provides Kierkegaard with an opportunity to raise difficult questions about the nature, and the value, of Christian faith.
        ellauri183.html on line 166: In his lectures on the Book of Genesis in the 16th century, Martin Luther praised Abraham for his uncritical obedience to God – for the "blind faith" exhibited by his refusal to question whether it was right to kill Isaac. In the late 18th century, Immanuel Kant took the opposite view, arguing that Abraham should have reasoned that such an evidently immoral command could not have come from God. For Luther, divine authority trumps any claim on behalf of reason or morality, whereas for Kant there can be nothing higher than the moral law.
        ellauri183.html on line 168: In Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard follows Kant in emphasising that Abraham's decision is morally repugnant and rationally unintelligible. However, he also shows that one consequence of Kant's view is that, if nothing is higher than human reason, then belief in God becomes dispensable. Unlike both Kant and Luther, Kierkegaard does not promote a particular judgment about Abraham, but rather presenz his readers with a dilemma: either Abraham is no better than a murderer, and there are no grounds for admiring him; or moral duties do not constitute the highest claim on the human being. Fear and Trembling does not resolve this dilemma, and perhaps for a religious person there is no entirely satisfactory way of resolving it.
        ellauri183.html on line 170: The dilemma is not unique to Abraham's situation. Kierkegaard was writing for 19th-century readers who regarded themselves as Christians – that is to say, as people who believed in the authority and goodness of God. By emphasising the difficulty of understanding Abraham's response to the divine command, he emphasises the difficulty of faith izelf. Implicit in his analysis of the story of Abraham is the question: would you do what Abraham did? How could you do such a thing? It seems unlikely that anyone who really thinx about these questions would conclude that he or she would have acted as Abraham did. Just as Abraham's faith is tested by God in the Book of Genesis, so the reader's own faith is tested by personal reflection on the biblical story.
        ellauri183.html on line 172: Kierkegaard's point in Fear and Trembling is not to recommend blind faith in God, but to unsettle his readers' blind faith in themselves. That is to say, he seex to challenge their complacent assumption that they are Christians. Only when this assumption was abandoned, he thought, could people embark on the task of becoming a Christian.
        ellauri183.html on line 174: However, Kierkegaard's Abraham does not just provide a paradigm of religious faith. If he is an admirable figure in spite of his murderous intentions, this is because he confronz with courage the loss of the person whom he loves most dearly. According to Kierkegaard, Abraham is a hero not by virtue of his obedience to God's command, but because he maintains his relationship to Isaac after giving him up.


        ellauri183.html on line 180: When Abraham raises his knife over Isaac's body, this symbolises the fact that every human relationship is haunted by the prospect of death. Love always ends in loss, at least within this life. One response to this existential fact – perhaps the most common response – is to avoid the issue of mortality as much as possible. An alternative response is to face up to the inevitable pain of loss and to relinquish the beloved in advance, so to speak, by giving up hope of enjoying a happy relationship within this lifetime. (This "movement of resignation" is described as "monastic", although it does not literally entail becoming a recluse. It is an internal movement, an adjustment of expectations.) In Kierkegaard's view, this is more noble than the first option, but it is very far from the courage of Abraham, who continues to love Isaac and enjoy his relationship to him in full awareness of the suffering that his death would bring. This aspect of the interpretation of Abraham offered in Fear and Trembling suggesz that, far from being an individualist, Kierkegaard regards human relationships as essential to life.
        ellauri183.html on line 182: In this text, the question of how to respond to the suffering associated with love and loss is closely connected to the question of how to live in relation to God. As many philosophers have pointed out – and as countless ordinary people have experienced at first hand – human suffering presenz a great challenge to belief in a just, loving, all-powerful God. For Kierkegaard, the testing of Abraham accentuates this challenge, and Abraham provides inspiration precisely because he manages to hold together an apparently irreconcilable contradiction: he believes that the God who commands him to do what is most terrible and painful is also the God who loves him. Again, according to this interpretation, the story of Abraham only testifies to the extraordinary difficulty of religious faith.
        ellauri183.html on line 194: Moral absolutism is certainly compatible with an acknowledgement that monetary value depends on circumstance. Jesus, for example, reinforced the 10 commandmenz, which unconditionally prohibit murder, adultery, theft and so on. But one day, when he was teaching in the temple, Jesus watched a poor widow put two small coins in the donation box, while rich people made much larger offerings. “This poor widow has put in more than all of them,” says Jesus, “because she, out of her poverty, has put in all she had to live on.” But by the criterion of moral absolutism they were just the same.
        ellauri183.html on line 206: José Ortega y Gasset (Madrid, 9 de mayo de 1883-ibídem, 18 de octubre de 1955) fue un filósofo y ensayista español, exponente principal de la teoría del perspectivismo y de la razón vital e histórica, situado en el movimiento del novecentismo.
        ellauri183.html on line 242: Ortega, en este período de falta de democracia, escribe en La rebelión de las masas que la historia, el progreso, se llevan a cabo por el trabajo de las minorías. Si va a haber una renovación, entonces, esto debe ser hecho por los mejores, que van a ser, sin embargo, reclutados de una manera liberal-democrática. Ortega teme que las masas van a pedirle todo al estado y que este les conceda todo a cambio de obediencia ciega: esto causaría un fracaso para emancipar a las masas. Su visión de la vida es básicamente libertaria con referencias principalmente anarquistas presentes en todos sus escritos. Trae consigo el liberalismo y el socialismo: el liberalismo debe perseguir una emancipación total del individuo (cualquiera que sea la clase a la que pertenezca), el socialismo debe abandonar el estado de estadolatría y terminar persiguiendo un igualitarismo excesivamente extremo.
        ellauri183.html on line 258: The nuclear holocaust has come and gone. Only one man survives: paleologist Calvin Cohn, who happened to be safely, deeply underwater at the time. And, after some black-humor-ish conversations with God, Cohn is allowed to live—for a while, at least—and he finds himself on an island a la Robinson Crusoe, with a communicative chimp named Buz (product of chimp-speech experiments) as his only companion. Cohn, son of a rabbi, engages in existential, religious, and Talmudic speculations with the chimp—though he refrains from trying to convert him to Judaism. He must reexamine the basics of social interaction—when Buz gets too physically chummy ("If you had suckled the lad, could you marry him?"), when a friendly gorilla appears and causes jealousies, and, above all, when five more talking chimps appear... including the lisping Mary Madelyn, the object of everyone's sexual attention (including Cohn's).
        ellauri183.html on line 260: Can a decent civilization be made from these creatures? Cohn believes that "if this small community behaved, developed, endured, it might someday—if some chimpy Father Abraham got himself born—produce its own Covenant with God." But such visions of a peaceful society are doomed, of course: envy, hatred, and violence inevitably ensue—and Cohn's mating with Mary Madelyn ("I have kept my virginity for you ever since you expwained the word to me when you first read me Rome and Juwiet") will eventually lead to murder and revolution.
        ellauri183.html on line 262: Despite Malamud's shadings with rabbinical law, then, this is a familiar hopeless-Utopia blueprint. Moreover, the restless treatment here—part downbeat-comic, part liturgical-lyric—never endows the tale with the sort of Biblical fervor which heightens the best of Doris Lessing´s fables. And the result is a disappointing, predictable parable—intentionally funny at times but unintentionally funny too, hollow in most of its lyrical moments, and only occasionally provocative in its eclectic philosophizing.
        ellauri183.html on line 276: In the end, Cohn is subsequently taken to be sacrificed by BUZ. Now my question is this: Did Malamud try to recreate the scenes of Christ's sacrifice or was he referring to Abraham's ascent to Moriah to sacrifice Isaac (or Ishmael) only in this case, it was the son preparing the Father for sacrifice?
        ellauri183.html on line 277: This book is like an abstract piece of art that invites several interpretations.
        ellauri183.html on line 285: Labour MP is told she is 'historically wrong, factually wrong and morally wrong' to make comparison between Putin's invasion of Ukraine and the situation in Israel and Palestine.
        ellauri183.html on line 287: Conservative former work and pensions secretary Stephen Crabb intervened to describe her comparison as 'historically wrong, factually wrong and morally wrong', and added that it did 'a huge disservice not just to the people of Ukraine but also to the people of Palestine and the people of Israel as well as to all the people in the west, who face a unique situation and set of challenges'.
        ellauri183.html on line 298: I've seen some images and gifs on r/imgoingtohellforthis and what not showing Jews as miserly people. What's all this about?
        ellauri183.html on line 317: Born in 1924 in Antwerp to a French-speaking Jewish family, Bromberger escaped the German invasion of Belgium with his parents and two brothers on May 10, 1940. After reaching Paris, then Bordeaux, his family obtained one of the last visas issued by the Portuguese consul Aristides de Sousa Mendes in Bayonne.
        ellauri183.html on line 323: In 1993, the MIT Press published a collection of essays in linguistics to honor Bromberger on the occasion of his retirement. "The View From Building 20," edited by Ken Hale and Jay Keyser, featured essays by Chomsky, Halle, Alec Marantz, and other distinguished colleagues. Jews every nose of them. Alec is not very distinguished, though he beat me for the Harvard Junior Fellowship.
        ellauri183.html on line 329: Early research in linguistic formal semantics used Partee's system to achieve a wealth of empirical and conceptual results. Later work by Irene Heim, Angelika Kratzer, Tanya Reinhart, Robert May and others built on Partee's work to further reconcile it with the generative approach to syntax. The resulting framework is known as the Heim and Kratzer system, after the authors of the textbook Semantics in Generative Grammar which first codified and popularized it. The Heim and Kratzer system differs from earlier approaches in that it incorporates a level of syntactic representation called logical form which undergoes semantic interpretation. Thus, this system often includes syntactic representations and operations which were introduced by translation rules in Montague's system. However, work by others such as Gerald Gazdar proposed models of the syntax-semantics interface which stayed closer to Montague's, providing a system of interpretation in which denotations could be computed on the basis of surface structures. These approaches live on in frameworks such as categorial grammar and combinatory categorial grammar.
        ellauri183.html on line 470: Mutta mitä muuta joutsen voi tehdä kuin kähistä?
        ellauri183.html on line 511: Mut hetkinen, tää sk. pyhän hengen pilkka olikin jotain muuta, tavallista juutalaista piheyttä! P. Henkeä ei edes mainita! Rahan henki tässä liitelee alkuseurakunnan keskellä. Ei ihme että seurakuntalaiset kauhistuivat. Mihkä porukoihin tässä on nyt jouduttu?
        ellauri183.html on line 519: Tilahan oli sinun, kun et vielä ollut myynyt sitä, ja sinun olivat myös rahat, kun sen myit. Kuinka saatoit ryhtyä tällaiseen tekoon? Et sinä ole valehdellut ihmisille, vaan Jumalalle.» 5Nämä sanat kuullessaan Ananias lyyhistyi kuolleena maahan, ja kaikki, jotka olivat tätä kuulemassa, joutuivat kauhun valtaan. 6Nuoret miehet kietoivat Ananiaan ruumiin vaatteeseen, kantoivat hänet ulos ja hautasivat hänet.
        ellauri183.html on line 553: Puhe on nyt miehistä, naisissahan on jo yllin kyllin merkkejä.
        ellauri183.html on line 573: Holy Prepuce eli Pyhä esinahka (Latinan kiel. sanctum præputium vel prepucium), on yksi monista Jeesukselle omistetuista pyhäinjäännöksistä, tässä tapauxessa tuotteen alkuperä on Jeesuksen ympärileikkaus. Useat kirkot Euroopassa ovat historian eri vaiheissa väittäneet omistavansa Jeesuksen esinahkaa, jopa samaan aikaan. Ei olisi ihme jos yhteen ommeltuina niillä päällystäisi vaikka sohvakaluston. Eri ihmeellinen se on, sille on annettu voimia.
        ellauri183.html on line 600: Suurin osa Pyhistä Prepucesista menetettiin tai tuhoutui tapahtumissa Uskonpuhdistus ja Ranskan vallankumous. Italian kylässä Calcata, pyhä esinahkaa sisältävä pyhäinjäännös näytettiin kaduilla jo vuonna 1983. Ympärileikkauksen juhla, joka aiemmin merkittiin roomalaiskatolinen kirkko ympäri maailmaa joka vuosi 1. tammikuuta. Käytäntö päättyi kuitenkin, kun varkaat varastivat, saaliina jalokivillä koristeltu kotelo, sisältö ja kaikki. Tämän varkauden jälkeen on epäselvää, onko jotakin väitetyistä Pyhistä Prepuceista edelleen olemassa. Vuoden 1997 televisio-dokumentissa elokuvalle Kanava 4, Brittiläinen toimittaja Miles Kington matkusti Italiaan etsimään pyhää esinahkaa, mutta ei löytänyt jäljellä olevaa esimerkkiä. National Geographic Channel lähetti 22. joulukuuta 2013 Fartley pääosassa dokumentin "The Quest for the Holy Foreskin". Lähde
        ellauri183.html on line 634: The war that Jewish scholars call The War of Varus (ei se "missä ovat legioonani" tunari vaan joku sen sukulainen). It is the war that took place in Galilee, Judaea and Idumaea just after the death of Herod which started with the massacre of the 3000 Jewish worshippers in the temple at the Passover of 1 B.C.E. Josephus stated that this war against the Jews which was directed by the governor of Syria, Quintilius Varus, took place in Palestine, but it has been a puzzle to historians that there appear to be no contemporary Roman accounts that justify it as occurring (ollenkaan tai ainakaan just tohon aikaan).
        ellauri183.html on line 636: Joku jutkuäijä väittää että tässä sodassa (joka se mielestä tapahtui 3v myöhemmin kuin tapahtui) juutalaisia ei mätkinytkään Varuxen pojanpoika Varus, vaan Julius Caesarin pojanpoika Gaius Caesar! It also allows the historical statements of the New Testament concerning the nativity of Jesus to take on a new credibility. Jesus was born in 3 B.C.E. (within the period stated by most early Christian scholars) and we now find this substantiated by the records of Roman history. Kaikenlaista sitä pitäisikin uskoa. En luota nähin kavereihin pitemmälle kuin jaxan niitä heittää. Mitä vittua, Jeesus syntyi 3v ennen Kristusta? Mahootointa! Onkohan mistään myyttisestä tapahtumasta taitettu niin paljon peistä kuin tästä?
        ellauri183.html on line 638: The Pharisees were the popular leaders of the Jews and the ones most laypeople looked to with confidence. The majority of the Jewish population was then expecting a world ruling messianic king to arise on the historical scene. And indeed, Josephus tells us that after Herod’s death many “kingly upstarts” emerged in Judaea and this reflects the general expectancy of the Jews that the messianic age was then imminent.
        ellauri183.html on line 700: Tähän liittyen Juudas Iskariot oli terroristi kommunistinen. Siitä tuli suuteleva pahis kaikkien aikojen. Huppupäisten Isis-äitien lähes vertainen.
        ellauri184.html on line 42: Norman Kingsley Mailer (January 31, 1923 – November 10, 2007) oli juutalainen vaikka normannimaisella salanimellä. Nachem ("Norman") Malech ("Kingsley") Mailer was born to a Jewish family in Long Branch, New Jersey on January 31, 1923. Carl Erik Carlsonia 3vk vanhempi, mutta kuoli 3v nuorempana. Sah nicht als Skelett aus, lyhkönen ja läski kolli. His father, Isaac Barnett Mailer, popularly known as "Barney", was an accountant born in South Africa, and his mother, Fanny (née Schneider), ran a housekeeping and nursing agency. Mailer's sister, Barbara, was born in 1927. Samanlaisia Schnizeleitä kuin Marxin veljexet, vaikka roomalaistuneita.
        ellauri184.html on line 44: Mailer was raised in Brooklyn, first in Flatbush on Cortelyou Rd and later in Crown Heights at the corner of Albany and Crown Streets. Mailer graduated from Boys High School and entered Harvard College in 1939, when he was 16 years old. As an undergraduate, he was a member of the Signet Society. Mousiken poiei kai ergazou, tee musaa ja duunaa. At Harvard, he majored in engineering sciences, but took writing courses as electives. He published his first story, "The Greatest Thing in the World," at the age of 18, winning Story magazine's college contest in 1941.
        ellauri184.html on line 46: After graduating in 1943, Mailer married his first wife Beatrice "Bea" Silverman in January 1944, just before being drafted into the U.S. Army. Hoping to gain a deferment from service, Mailer argued that he was writing an "important literary work" which pertained to the war. This deferral was denied, and Mailer was forced to enter the Army. After training at Fort Bragg, Mailer was stationed in the Philippines with the 112th Cavalry. Merihevosilla varmaan mentiin.
        ellauri184.html on line 48: During his time in the Philippines, Mailer was first assigned to regimental headquarters as a typist, then assigned as a wire lineman. In early 1945, after volunteering for a reconnaissance platoon, he completed more than two dozen patrols in contested territory, and engaged in a few firefights and skirmishes. After the Japanese surrender, he was sent to Japan as part of the army of occupation, was promoted to sergeant, and became a first cook and argued about his girth.
        ellauri184.html on line 50: Neiti Mallory kertoo tästä lisää: "Norman was an oxymoron — an overweight senior citizen who was one of the best lovers I ever had." Mallory writes that Mailer never had erectile dysfunction: "Not once. Not in nine years..." Vanhasta Naahumista tulee mieleen Norssin voimistelunopettaja Lahtinen ja Star Warsin Yoda. “Each week he’d want to play a new game . . . doctor, manicurist, masseur, Hollywood director (that was his favorite).” “When our relationship ended, I realized that . . . Norman had never been on my team and had been slandering my writing and me behind my back.”
        ellauri184.html on line 52: When asked about his war experiences, he said that the army was "the worst experience of my life, and also the most important". While in Japan and the Philippines, Mailer wrote to his wife Bea almost daily, and these approximately 400 letters became the foundation of The Naked and the Dead. He drew on his experience as a reconnaissance rifleman for the central action of the novel: a long patrol behind enemy lines. Kaukopartiomiehenä. Kansa taisteli ja miehet kertovat.
        ellauri184.html on line 54: When asked about his women experiences, Nuchem had a lot more to show and tell.
        ellauri184.html on line 56: Mailer was married six times and had nine children. He fathered eight children by his various wives and infernally adopted his sixth wife's son from another marriage.
        ellauri184.html on line 60: Morales moved in with Mailer during 1951 into an apartment on First Avenue near Second Street in the East Village, and they married in 1954. They had two daughters, Danielle and Elizabeth. After attending a party on Saturday, November 19, 1960, Mailer stabbed Adele twice with a two-and-a-half inch blade that he used to clean his nails, nearly killing her by puncturing her pericardium. He stabbed her once in the chest and once in the back. Adele required emergency surgery but made a quick recovery. Mailer claimed he had stabbed Adele "to relieve her of cancer". He was involuntarily committed to Bellevue Hospital for 17 days. While Adele did not press charges, saying she wanted to protect their daughters, Mailer later pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of assault saying, "I feel I did a lousy, dirty, cowardly thing", and received a suspended sentence of three years' probation. In 1962, the two divorced. In 1997, Adele published a memoir of their marriage entitled The Last Party, which recounted her husband stabbing her at a party and the aftermath. This incident has been a focal point for feminist critics of Mailer, who point to themes of sexual violence in his work.
        ellauri184.html on line 64: His fourth marriage, in 1963, was to Beverly Bentley, a former model turned actress. She was the mother of two of his sons, producer Michael Mailer and actor Stephen Mailer. They divorced in 1980.
        ellauri184.html on line 70: Over the course of his life, Mailer was connected with several women other than his wives, including Carole Mallory, who wrote a "tell all" biography, Loving Mailer, after his death.
        ellauri184.html on line 72: Bodily urges are fundamental to Mailer's approach to novels and short works. According to his obituary in The Independent, his "relentless machismo seemed out of place in a man who was actually quite small – though perhaps that was where the aggression originated." For Mailer, African-American men reflected a challenge to his own notions of masculinity. His pecker was not much bigger than those of Hemingway and Scott Fitzgerald, about the size of his pen knife. Like many men with a tiny penis he sought comfort with men and women equally. Throughout his work and personal communications, Nuchem repeatedly expresses interest in, includes episodes of or makes references to, bisexuality or homosexuality.
        ellauri184.html on line 74: Mailer wrote 12 novels in 59 years. After completing courses in French language and culture at the University of Paris in 1947–48, he returned to the U.S. shortly after The Naked and the Dead was published in May 1948. A New York Times best seller for 62 weeks, it was the only one of Mailer's novels to reach the number one position. It was hailed by many as one of the best American wartime novels and included in a list of the hundred best English-language novels of the twentieth century by the Modern Library. The book that made his reputation sold over a million copies in its first year, (three million by 1981) and has never gone out of print. It is still considered to be one of the finest depictions of Americans in combat during World War II.
        ellauri184.html on line 76: Barbary Shore (1951) was not well received by the critics. It was a surreal parable of Cold War leftist politics set in a Brooklyn rooming-house, and Mailer's most autobiographical novel. His 1955 novel, The Deer Park drew on his experiences working as a screenwriter in Hollywood from 1949 to 1950. It was initially rejected by seven publishers due to its purportedly sexual content before being published by Putnam's. It was not a critical success, but it made the best-seller list, sold over 50,000 copies its first year, and is considered by some critics to be the best Hollywood novel since Nathanael West's The Day of the Locust.
        ellauri184.html on line 78: Mailer wrote his fourth novel, An American Dream, as a serial in Esquire magazine over eight months (January to August 1964), publishing the first chapter two months after he wrote it. In March 1965, Dial Press published a revised version. The novel generally received mixed reviews, but was a best seller. Joan Didion praised it in a review in National Review (April 20, 1965) and John W. Aldridge did the same in Life (March 19, 1965), while Elizabeth Hardwick panned it in Partisan Review (spring 1965).
        ellauri184.html on line 80: Mailer's fifth novel, Why Are We in Vietnam? was even more experimental in its prose than An American Dream. Published in 1967, the critical reception of WWVN was mostly positive with many critics, like John Aldridge in Harper's, calling the novel a masterpiece and comparing it to Joyce. Mailer's obscene language was criticized by critics such as Granville Hicks writing in the Saturday Review and the anonymous reviewer in Time. Eliot Fremont-Smith calls WWVN "the most original, courageous and provocative novel so far this year" that's likely to be "mistakenly reviled". Other critics, such as Denis Donoghue from the New York Review of Books praised Mailer for his verisimilitude "for the sensory event". Donoghue recalls Josephine Miles' study of the American Sublime, reasoning WWVN's voice and style as the drive behind Mailer's impact.
        ellauri184.html on line 86: Mailer spent a longer time writing Ancient Evenings, his novel of Egypt in the Twentieth Dynasty (about 1100 BC), than any of his other books. He worked on it for periods from 1972 until 1983. It was also a bestseller, although reviews were generally negative. Harold Bloom, in his review said the book "gives every sign of truncation", and "could be half again as long, but no reader will wish so", while Richard Poirier called it Mailer's "most audacious book".
        ellauri184.html on line 88: Harlot's Ghost, Mailer's longest novel (1310 pages), appeared in 1991 and received his best reviews since The Executioner's Song. It is an exploration of the untold dramas of the CIA from the end of World War II to 1965. He performed a huge amount of research for the novel, which is still on CIA reading lists. He ended the novel with the words "To be continued" and planned to write a sequel, titled Harlot's Grave, but other projects intervened and he never wrote it. Harlot's Ghost sold well.
        ellauri184.html on line 90: His final novel, The Castle in the Forest, which focused on Hitler's childhood, reached number five on the Times best-seller list after publication in January 2007. It received reviews that were more positive than any of his books since The Executioner's Song. Castle was intended to be the first volume of a trilogy, but Mailer died several months after it was completed. The Castle in the Forest received a laudatory 6,200-word front-page review by Lee Siegel in the New York Times Book Review, as well as a Bad Sex in Fiction Award by the Literary Review magazine.
        ellauri184.html on line 92: Critical response to Mailer's Jesus novel was mixed. Jack Miles, writing for Commonweal, found the book "a quiet, sweet, almost wan little book, a kindly offering from a New York Jew to his wife's Bible Belt family." He noted that there was "something undeniably impressive about the restraint" of the style that Mailer undertook in composing the novel. He concluded that the novel was neither one of Mailer's best works, nor would it stand out amongst the bibliography of books inspired by the life of Christ, but that it had received unfairly harsh reviews from other critics.
        ellauri184.html on line 95: Notorious philanderer," "egomaniac," "pugnacious" and "pompous" are a few of the milder epitaphs that have been used to describe controversial and larger-than-life (inevitably) Norman Mailer. His New York Times obituary was even titled, "Norman Mailer, Towering Writer With Matching Ego, Dies at 84." Known in the literary world as one of the greatest writers of the twentieth century, Mailer won two Pulitzer Prizes in literature and one National Book Award. He is credited with having pioneered creative nonfiction as a genre, also called New Journalism. During his life he became as famous for his relationships with women as he did for his literary work. He was married six times and fathered eight children. Here is a brief look at some the six wives of Norman Mailer.
        ellauri184.html on line 97: Bea Silverman was Norman Mailer's college sweetheart and first wife. He met her during his junior year at Harvard while she was a student at Boston University. They divorced in 1952 when Nuchem was already philandering with Speedy Gonzales.
        ellauri184.html on line 99: Norris Church was born Barbara Jean Davis and grew up in Atkins, Arkansas, the daughter of Free Will Baptists. At the age of three she won the title of Little Miss Little Rock. In her twenties she had a brief fling with a young Bill Clinton. She met Mailer in 1975 when he came to Russellville, Arkansas to promote his biography of Marilyn Monroe. The two fell into a passionate love affair, despite their 26-year age difference (sama kuin jos mä olisin vaihtanut Seijan niihin pieniin kiinalaisiin), and Church moved to New York a few months later. At the suggestion of Mailer, she changed her name to Norris Church when she began modeling with the Wilhelmina Modeling Agency. Norris was the last name of her first husband, and Mailer suggested Church since she had been a frequent church-goer while she was growing up. Eli siis tää Jee-suxen bio oli niikö lahja Norrixelle.
        ellauri184.html on line 110: Eight days after Yeshua was born, his parents followed the Law and took Him to the Temple to be circumcised. Esinahka on kuulemma Italiassa reliikkinä.
        ellauri184.html on line 112: Parempi olla Herodeen sika kuin sen poika, quippas Augustus. Söiköhän se sikoja? Sehän oli kike vain nimeltä. Herodexen genosidin historiallisuudesta taisi olla epäilyxiä.
        ellauri184.html on line 127: The Bible stated that Mary and Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, were cousins. While this appears to be a clear cut answer, there is more than meets the eye as to how Mary and Elizabeth were related.
        ellauri184.html on line 217: Ed posted this for all those ‘Jesus was a Jew’ types who swallow this nonsense without understanding the inherent fallacies and/or dangers associated with such statements.
        ellauri184.html on line 221: But, he says, “this is a gross distortion of the historical and cultural reality.” The northern province of Galilee was decisively distinct—in history, political status, and culture—from the southern province of Judea which contained the holy city of Jerusalem.
        ellauri184.html on line 228: Politically Galilee had been under separate administration from Judea during almost all its history since the tenth century B.C. (apart from a period of “reunification” under the Maccabees), and in the time of Jesus it was under a (supposedly) native Herodian prince, while Judea and Samaria had since A.D. 6 been under the direct rule of a Roman prefect.
        ellauri184.html on line 232: Culturally Judeans despised their northern neighbors as country cousins, their lack of Jewish sophistication being compounded by their greater openness to Hellenistic influence.
        ellauri184.html on line 237: The result, he says, is that even an impeccably Jewish Galilean in first-century Jerusalem was not among his own people; he was as much a foreigner as an Irishman in London or a Kuopio person in Helsinki. His accent would immediately mark him out as “not one of us,” and all the communal prejudice of the supposedly superior culture of the capital city would stand against his claim to be heard even as a prophet, let alone as the “Messiah,” a title which, as everyone knew, belonged to Judea (cf. John 7:40-42 ).
        ellauri184.html on line 239: This may at first blush sound like interesting background material that is not especially helpful for reading and interpreting the gospels. But Mark and Matthew have structured their narratives around a geographical framework dividing the north and the south, culminating in the confrontation of this prophet from Galilee and the religious establishment of Jerusalem.
        ellauri184.html on line 241: Professor France writes: “To read Matthew in blissful ignorance of first-century Palestinian sociopolitics is to miss his point. This is the story of Jesus of Nazareth .” (theuglytruth.wordpress.com is no longer available. This site has been archived or suspended for a violation of our Terms of Service.)
        ellauri184.html on line 257: The Bible records that following the completion of the conquest of Canaan by the Israelite tribes, Joshua allocated the land among the twelve tribes. According to biblical scholar Kenneth Kitchen, this conquest should be dated slightly after 1200 BCE. Some modern scholars argue that the conquest of Joshua, as described in the Book of Joshua, never occurred. “Besides the rejection of the Albrightian conquest model, the general consensus among OT scholars is that the Book of Joshua has no value in the historical reconstruction. They see the book as an ideological retrojection from a later period — either as early as the reign of Josiah or as late as the Hasmonean period.” "It behooves us to ask, in spite of the fact that the overwhelming consensus of modern scholarship is that Joshua is a pious fiction composed by the deuteronomistic school, how does and how has the Jewish community dealt with these foundational narratives, saturated as they are with acts of violence against others?" ”Recent decades, for example, have seen a remarkable reevaluation of evidence concerning the conquest of the land of Canaan by Joshua. As more sites have been excavated, there has been a growing consensus that the main story of Joshua, that of a speedy and complete conquest (e.g. Josh. 11.23: 'Thus Joshua conquered the whole country, just as the LORD had promised Moses') is contradicted by the archaeological record, though there are indications of some destruction at the appropriate time. No oliko sitten koko esinahkakasa satua? Ketä enää uskoa? Usko siirtää vuoria, eikö sitten esinahkakukkuloita?
        ellauri184.html on line 261: Ukraine’s foreign minister tells his US counterpart in a meeting that his country needs fighter jets and air defence systems and has called NATO’s refusal to implement a no-fly zone over Ukraine a “sign of weakness”. Buk-buk-buk chickens!
        ellauri184.html on line 265: Thanks in large part to Jesus-movies and swords-and-sandals cinematic epics (e.g., Ben-Hur, Masada, Spartacus, Life of Brian), there is a widespread perception that distinctively Woman soldiers infested Palestine during the life of Jesus – often signaled in such films by highbwow Bwitish accents in contrast with the unpretentious American dialect spoken by Jews. As deeply engrained as this image is in the popular consciousness, it is not entirely accurate. There were several different types of soldiers in the Woman East during the New Testament period and the differences between these soldiers were significant; the languages they spoke, the government they worked for, their relationship to the civilians they encountered, their pay, and many other specifics differed considerably.
        ellauri184.html on line 267: This image of identifiably Woman soldiers occupying the land of Palestine operates on the assumption that biblical soldiers were all legionawies. Legionawies differed from other soldiers of the early Woman period in several wespects. First, legionawies were employed directly by Wome. Their allegiances were to the empewow and whichever genewal they served, not to any particular king, weligious group, or province. All troops swore an oath of allegiance, the sacwamentum, to the empewow himself. Unlike most other soldiers, legionawies were Woman citizens before they were wecwuited.
        ellauri184.html on line 282: Samuel Rocca likewise concludes that most of his troops were in fact Jews, and that Herod’s army thus did not differ much from the Hasmonaean army that preceded it.
        ellauri184.html on line 289: Thus, while Wome did not conscript Jews into militawy service against their will, there is no indication that this pwevented them from serving on their own accord. Several tax receipts of Jewish decurions named Jesus, Hananiah, Benjamin and a diploma to Aggaeus Bar-Callippus, a Jewish veteran who retired to the Syrian city of Samosata. We should not forget the famous example of Tiberius Julius Alexander, governor of Judaea and Egypt, a Jewish officer who led the assault on the Jerusalem temple in the Jewish War.
        ellauri184.html on line 314: (2) Jesus did not tell the centurion to stop having sex with his slave.
        ellauri184.html on line 320: There are six main arguments against the assumption that Jesus was endorsing homosexual relations in his encounter with the centurion at Capernaum. Individually, they are strong arguments. Collectively they work like a condom, make an airtight case against a pro-homosex reading. Here they are:
        ellauri184.html on line 324: (2) Jesus would have had to endorse a gender change operation in this case.
        ellauri184.html on line 342: The village was inhabited continuously from the second century BC to the 11th century AD, when it was abandoned sometime before the First Crusade. This includes the re-establishment of the village during the Early Islamic period soon after the 749 earthquake. The village subsequently became known as al-Samakiyya; it was depopulated of its Palestinian population during the 1947–1948 civil war in Mandatory Palestine on May 4, 1948, under Operation Matateh.
        ellauri184.html on line 346: The town is cited in all four gospels (Matthew 4:13, 8:5, 11:23, 17:24, Mark 1:21, 2:1, 9:33, Luke 4:23, 31,7:1, 10:15, John 2:12, 4:46, 6:17, 24, 59) where it was reported to have been the hometown of the tax collector Matthew (aka Leevi, eri kuin evankelista), and located not far from Bethsaida, the hometown of the apostles Simon Peter, Andrew, James and John. Some readers take Mark 2:1 as evidence that Jesus may have owned a home in the town, but it is more likely that he stayed in the house of one of his followers here. He certainly spent time teaching and healing there. One Sabbath, Jesus taught in the synagogue in Capernaum and healed a man who was possessed by an unclean spirit (Luke 4:31–36 and Mark 1:21–28). This story is notable as the only one that is common to the gospels of Mark and Luke, but not contained in the Gospel of Matthew (see Synoptic Gospels for more literary comparison between the gospels). Afterward, Jesus healed Simon Peter´s mother-in-law of a fever (Luke 4:38–39). According to Luke 7:1–10 and Matthew 8:5, this is also the place where Jesus healed the boyfriend of a Roman centurion who had asked for his help. Capernaum is also the location of the healing of the paralytic lowered by friends through the roof to reach Jesus, as reported in Mark 2:1–12 and Luke 5:17–26.
        ellauri184.html on line 348: In Matthew 9:1 the town is referred to only as "his own city", and the narrative in Matthew 9:2–7 does not mention the paralytic being lowered through the roof. Most traditional biblical commentators (e.g. Bengel, Benson and the Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary) assume that in Matthew 9:1–7 "his own city" means Capernaum, because of the details that are common to the three synoptic gospels.
        ellauri184.html on line 350: According to the Synoptic Gospels, Jesus selected this town as the center of his public ministry in Galilee after he left the small mountainous hamlet of Nazareth (Matthew 4:12–17). He also formally cursed Capernaum, along with Bethsaida and Chorazin, saying "you will be thrown down to the pit!" (Matthew 11:23) because of their lack of faith in him as the Messiah.
        ellauri184.html on line 352: And you, Capernaum, will you be lifted to the heavens? No, you will go down into the pit. For if the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Sodom, it would have remained to this day! Fuck you guys! You will regret it!
        ellauri184.html on line 355: First, the problem is theological: The apostle Paul clearly marks the beginning of sodomy with the practical theological problem of idolatry. “although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts...” (Rom. 1:21 ). What was the result? “For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged their natural use for what is against nature. LIkewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due” (Rom. 1:26-27 ). In short, a skewed vision of God leads directly to a skewed vision of man and human sexuality.
        ellauri184.html on line 357: Second, the fact that it is a theological issue does not prevent it from being a moral one as well. The behavior is sin. “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not deceived. Neither formicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6:9-10 ). The word translated “homosexuals” here strictly refers to catamites — the word has the connotation of soft. We would say swish. The other word sodomite refers to the “male” homosexual, the one playing the role of the male. All the ingenuity in the world cannot change what the Bible bluntly states here. As well, consider 1 Tim. 1:10 . “. . . for fornicators, for sodomites . . . and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine.” The Old Testament speaks to this as well. See Deut. 23:17-18 , Job 36:14 , Lev. 18:22 . Those guilty of such things are living in a contemptible way, and the Scripture calls them dogs. Poor dogs.
        ellauri184.html on line 364: When God is pleased to grant reformation and revival in our time, this will mean that our churches will begin to fill up with cleansed and forgiven sodomites. Can't say for sure about the catamites, thery're so swishy.
        ellauri184.html on line 423: You have heard that it was said, "You shall not commit adultery." But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart (Matthew 5:27-28, NIV).
        ellauri184.html on line 486: Glasgow’ssa Skotlannissa 12. toukokuuta 1887 syntynyt Roope Ankka loi käytännössä yksin erään historian suurimmista finanssi-imperiumeista. Aiemmin mahtavan, mutta 1700-luvulla pahasti köyhtyneen MacAnkan suvun viimeinen miespuolinen vesa lähti nuorena Amerikkaan ja päätyi Klondikeen ja Alaskaan, missä rikastui kullankaivajana ja loi perustan myöhemmille liiketoimilleen. Ankka tunnettiin seudulla pelättynä hahmona, joka oli armoton muita valtauksenanastajia kohtaan.
        ellauri184.html on line 524: In 167 BCE Judea was part of the Seleucid Empire. Its ruler, Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175–165 BCE), smarting from a defeat in a war against Ptolemaic Egypt, banned traditional Jewish religious practices, and attempted to forcibly let the Jews accept Hellenistic culture. Throughout the country Jews were ordered, with the threat of execution, to sacrifice pigs to Greek gods (the normal practice in the Ancient Greek religion), desecrate the Shabbat, eat unkosher animals (especially pork), and relinquish their Jewish scriptures. Antiochus´ decree also outlawed Jewish circumcision, and parents who violated his order were hanged along with their infants.[1Mac 1:46-67] According to Tacitus, as quoted by Hodges, Antiochus "endeavoured to abolish Jewish superstition and to introduce Greek civilization."
        ellauri184.html on line 526: According to rabbinical accounts, he desecrated the Second Temple of Jerusalem by placing a statue of Olympian Zeus on the altar of the Temple; this incident is also reported by the biblical Book of Daniel, where the author refers to the statue of the Greek god inside the Temple as "abomination of desolation". Antiochus´ decrees and vituperation of Judaism motivated the Maccabean Revolt; the Maccabees reacted violently against the forced Hellenization of Judea, destroyed pagan altars in the villages, circumcised boys, and forced Hellenized Jews into outlawry. The revolt ended in the re-establishment of an independent Jewish kingdom under the Hasmoneans, until it turned into a client state of the Roman Republic under the reign of Herod the Great (37–4 BCE).
        ellauri184.html on line 530: Hadrian´s policy after the rebellion reflected an attempt to root out Judaism: he enacted a ban on circumcision, all Jews were forbidden to enter Jerusalem upon pain of death, and the city was renamed Aelia Capitolina, while Judea was renamed Syria Palaestina. Around 140, his successor Antoninus Pius (138-161 CE) exempted Jews from the decree against circumcision, allowing them to circumcise their sons, although they were forbidden to do the same on their slaves and proselytes. Jewish nationalists´ (Pharisees and Zealots) response to the decrees also took a more moderate form: circumcisions were secretly performed, even on dead Jews.
        ellauri184.html on line 532: However, there were also many Jews, known as "Hellenizers", who viewed Hellenization and social integration of the Jewish people in the Greco-Roman world favourably, and pursued a completely different approach: accepting the Emperor´s decree and even making efforts to restore their foreskins to better assimilate into Hellenistic society. The latter approach was common during the reign of Antiochus, and again under Roman rule. The foreskin was restored by one of two methods, that were later revived in the late 20th century; both were described in detail by the Greek physician Aulus Cornelius Celsus in his comprehensive encyclopedic work De Medicina, written during the reign of Tiberius (14-37 CE). The surgical method involved freeing the skin covering the penis by dissection, and then pulling it forward over the glans; he also described a simpler surgical technique used on men whose prepuce is naturally insufficient to cover their glans. The second approach, known as "epispasm", was non-surgical: a restoration device which consisted of a special weight made of bronze, copper, or leather (sometimes called Pondus Judaeus, i. e. "Jewish burden"), was affixed to the penis, pulling its skin downward. Over time, a new foreskin was generated, or a short prepuce was lengthened, by means of tissue expansion. Martial also mentioned the instrument in Epigrammaton (Book 7:35).
        ellauri184.html on line 534: The Apostle Paul referred to these practices in his letters, saying: "Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised."[1Cor 7:18] But he also explicitly denounced the forcing of circumcision upon non-Jews, rejecting and condemning those Judaizers who stipulated the ritual to Gentile Christians, labelling such advocates as "false brothers"[Gal 2:4] (see below). In the mid-2nd century Rabbinical Jewish leaders, due to increasing cases of foreskin restorations in Roman Empire, introduced a radical method of circumcision, the periah, that left the glans totally uncovered and sew the remaining skin. The new method became immediately the only valid circumcision procedure, to ensure that a born Jew will remain circumcised and avoiding risk of restoring the foreskin. Operations became mostly irreversible.
        ellauri184.html on line 545: Jeshua johtuu peukuttamaan vähän nolona universalismia. Eka sen piti olla messias tuppikulleille, muzen jutut uppos pakanoihin paljon paremmin. Sixe siteeraa Hesekielin luvusta 34 et herra isoherra hakee lampaat vaikka mistä puskista. Ja loppu on jo historiaa! Paavo Haavikkokin ymmärsi olla gentiilien apostoli, that´s where the big money is. Or was, nythän maailman rikkaimmissa on juutalaisia niin että nupit kolkkaavat. Kirjan oppineiden mielestä sananlevitys pakanoille oli pilkantekoa. Tästä saivat esinahkasodat uutta vauhtia.
        ellauri184.html on line 573: Seuraavana päivänä Jeshua jatkaa vertyneenä profetointia: The words of the prophets will be written on subway walls and tenement halls and whispered in the sound of silence.
        ellauri184.html on line 584: Selkeesti on Naahum kirjoittanut tän autobiografisen jumalloizun juutalainen kieli poskessa. Huomasikohan sen goi sukulaiset sen pikku vizejä? Kriitikkoihin kaikki meni täydestä kuin väärä raha. Läppä läppä. Juutalaiset eivät tilaa pelastusmiehistöä vaan reilun erotuomarin joka on niiden puolella.
        ellauri184.html on line 622: In summary, the following understanding of biblical history seems plausible: 1. Although the Sanhedrin had the right to condemn Jesus to death and execute the sentence, it seemed opportune for various reasons to have the governor render this verdict. Moreover, although the Sanhedrin and the Roman governor had very diverse perspectives on Jesus, their interests finally converged, which led to Pilate’s condemnation of Jesus on grounds of unproven political charges.
        ellauri184.html on line 623: 2. Processes of marginalization and not the concrete breaking of laws – led to Jesus’s death. Not only was Jesus passively exposed to these processes of marginalization, but he partly contributed to them because he modelled himself as an outsider and distanced himself too little from the messianic expectations ascribed to him. This staged self-marginalization – partly done in performative fashion – was dangerous because the term “Messiah” was often charged with political content, as was exemplified by numerous rebel leaders who regarded themselves as the Messiah or were considered as such by their followers. Many of them were executed, including Jesus.
        ellauri184.html on line 625: Extant historical sources provide a complicated hodgepodge of religious, political, mental, and socio- psychological issues that prove difficult to disentangle. Most of all, the religious issues cannot be separated from the political ones. I propose four hypotheses (not very original):
        ellauri184.html on line 627: a) Jesus’s unusual behavior at different levels mostly explains the hatred against him. He did not breach any major laws, but more seriously, he did not live up to multiple expectations; instead, he maneuvered himself into the position of an outsider. This means that it was mental and psychological dispositions and perceptions on the part of his contemporaries – and not legal issues – that led to his receiving the death penalty.
        ellauri184.html on line 631: c) A political twist could be ascribed to each of these issues so as to obtain a capital sentence from the Roman governor. The Sanhedrin took on this task.
        ellauri184.html on line 638: If it is correct that the charge of blasphemy was brought forward (i.e., that Jesus claimed to be the eschatologically defined Son of Man, which seems to be the main reason for his execution in Jewish understanding), it would be easy to ascribe a political implication to this charge. This line of political argumentation is most clearly expressed in Luke 23.2: “We found this man perverting our nation, forbidding us to pay taxes to the emperor, and saying that he himself is the Messiah. The use of the death penalty confirms this political charge (crimen laesae maiestatis). Crucifixion as a Roman form of execution was reserved for slaves and peregrines who were involved in insurrections. The subtitle on the cross (ho basileus ton Iudaion, Iesus Nazarenus rex Iudaeorum, INRI), if it is historical, corroborates this particular charge.
        ellauri184.html on line 640: We do not know whether Jesus routinely called himself the Messiah, Son of Man, or King of the Jews (though the evangelists sure make it appear so). Nevertheless, these logos were ascribed to him, and he did not sufficiently distance himself from them. Even worse, he presented himself as an outsider by caring for outcasts and thus broke social taboos. What is more, through healings, exorcisms, and commensality with the disdained, he deliberately distanced himself from societal norms, added to his image as an outsider in a performative way, and thereby metaphorically conveyed a message that his opponents understood very well.
        ellauri184.html on line 642: By deriving his superior authority directly from God (e.g., in exorcisms and forgiveness of sins: Lk. 7.47-50) through his unique proximity to God and his ultimate claim to his unique interpretation of divine law – he exclusively set his own standards and his own criteria of who had access to Heaven and who did not – he upset the masses and caught the attention of the authorities, who perceived such utterances as subversive. More and more, they felt threatened in their own authority. In addition to behaving as though bestowed with superior authority, Jesus sharply criticized the Temple to the point that he finally became violent within its precincts. After a final incident, the representatives of the Temple, the priests, the scribes, and the Elders, who strove to preserve the core of the Jewish faith as embodied in the Temple, felt threatened in their position.
        ellauri184.html on line 644: The fact that Jesus had been preaching God’s word was irrelevant to Pilate. Sitähän ne liuhuparrat myötäänsä tekevät. The term “Messiah” which Jesus had been using, was more threatening to Pilate as it was laden with political connotations. The term presupposed that the “big king" (God) would make his reign prevail via a small king (Messiah), who had yet to appear. The only thing that remained unclear was exactly who this “small king" would be (a descendant of David’s?) and under what circumstances he would appear.
        ellauri184.html on line 649: Jesus was not merely a prophet. Due to his wanderings and teachings, he was also a radical itinerant charismatic preacher who represented a decidedly anti-hegemonial world view. His speeches were seen by the Jewish establishment as an incitement of the people.
        ellauri184.html on line 651: To the average inhabitant of the Roman Empire, the manifold itinerant groups of magicians, sophists, cynics, other philosophers, astrologers, prophets, and eventually also Christians, must have appeared basically the same. These oscillating and enigmatic figures were simultaneously admired and despised for their "otherness". Why was Jesus able to appear as a radical itinerant preacher? He did not call for a political upheaval. Nevertheless, his messianic “program” was radical in its postulation of a proximity to God that had hitherto been unheard of and was based on the deliberate breaking of taboos and social conventions.
        ellauri184.html on line 653: In the end, Jesus represented several different images of a bogeyman and became an outsider par excellence. He put off many of his adherents through his negligence of politics (i.e. he did not yield to their pressure to exert violence for political reasons), and he drew the attention of the authorities upon himself and made them suspicious through his eccentric speeches. Finally, Jesus was between the stools: There was no one left to speak in his favor. In the end, perceptions prevailed beyond all else.
        ellauri184.html on line 655: The Romans regarded him as a political dissident, or an insurgent – which the word lestes/latro appropriately captured – via the claim that he was King of the Jews, a claim that he never denied. Jesus’s hobo life testified to his calling as a prophet and radical wandering charismatic who constantly transgressed social boundaries. These multi-faceted processes of marginalization that Jesus partly took on voluntarily and partly endured led – in the brutal logic of the time – to his crucifixion as an outsider.
        ellauri184.html on line 676: Nazareth, also a son of his father, as a
        ellauri184.html on line 682: The custom of releasing prisoners in Jerusalem at Passover is known to theologians as the Paschal Pardon, but this custom (whether at Passover or any other time) is not recorded in any historical document other than the gospels, leading some scholars to question its historicity and suspect that such a custom was a mere narrative invention of the Bible´s writers like so much else in the fake good news.
        ellauri184.html on line 692: Among the 52 early Christian and Gnostic texts discovered at Nag Hammadi in 1945, one of the most enigmatic is a Valentinian text called the Gospel of Philip. This is one of several “Gnostic” texts which puts a special emphasis on the relationship between Mary Magdalene and Jesus. One of the more obscure sections concerns three Marys who were always with Jesus.
        ellauri184.html on line 696: Three women always walked with the master: Mary his mother, <his> sister, and Mary of Magdala, who is called his "companion". For “Mary” is the name of his sister, his mother, and his companion.
        ellauri184.html on line 698: The word his in brackets is uncertain because of damage to the text but is repeated later in the text, so the reconstruction is likely correct. However, there is no record of Jesus having a sister named Mary.
        ellauri184.html on line 700: 3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him. (Mark 6:3 KJV)
        ellauri184.html on line 708: This first is Michael, the merciful and long-suffering: and the second, who is set over all the diseases and all the wounds of the children of men, is Raphael: and the third, who is set over all the powers, is Gabriel: and the fourth, who is set over the repentance unto hope of those who inherit eternal life, is named Phanuel.’
        ellauri184.html on line 710: Let us return to the topic of this article. Does Jesus Have a Sister Named Mary?
        ellauri184.html on line 711: Yes, according to this view, He does. It seems that Jesus and Mary share the same father, the archangel Gabriel. This makes Mary both the mother and sister of Jesus. That, at least, seems to be the implication that the Gospel of Philip is hinting at.
        ellauri184.html on line 734: When Jesus was on the cross, both the apostle John and Mary the mother of Jesus stood nearby. In John 19:26–27 we read, “When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to her, ‘Woman, here is your son,’ and to the disciple, ‘Here is your mother.’ From that time on, this disciple took her into his home.” The clear understanding of the passage is that Jesus commanded John to care for Mary after His death.
        ellauri184.html on line 736: Mary was most certainly a widow at this point in her life and also an older woman. Though she had other sons, Jesus chose John to provide care for Mary after His death. Why? Because Jesus’ brothers did not become believers until after His resurrection (John 7:5). Further, Jesus’ brothers were not present at His crucifixion. They had other errands just then. Jesus was entrusting Mary to John, who was a believer and was present, rather than entrusting her to His brothers, who were not believers and who were not even interested enough to be present at his crucifixion.
        ellauri184.html on line 738: As the eldest son in His family, Jesus had a cultural obligation to care for His mother, and He passed that obligation on to one of His closest friends. John would have certainly obeyed this command. Mary was most likely one of the women in the upper room and was present when the church was established in Jerusalem (Acts 1:12–14). She probably continued to stay with John in Jerusalem until her death. It is only later in John’s life that his writings and church history reveal John left Jerusalem and ministered in other areas. By then he had probably got rid of mamma Maria.
        ellauri184.html on line 740: This is also confirmed by Acts 8:1 that reads, “On that day a great persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and all except the apostles were scattered throughout Judea and Samaria.” John was still in the city at this time (perhaps one or two years after the resurrection) and was still there three years after the conversion of Simon to Paul (Galatians 2:9).
        ellauri184.html on line 742: There is no contextual proof within Scripture itself that would point to Jesus broadening Mary’s role as “mother” of all Christians. In fact, Catholic teaching can only point to early church leaders as proof that Jesus meant to establish Mary’s “motherhood” to all believers in Christ or that Mary was a cooperative participant in salvation. John just took Mary into his home to care for her. The Bible does not say “from that time on Mary became the stepmother of all believers.”
        ellauri184.html on line 763: Let me just say: Norman Mailer is a massive loud mouthed boorish prick and yawning asshole of a man. His views towards women were...well, they were pretty fucked up for lack of better French. And his opinions on minorities has always been rather peculiar. As in very very strange. A former atheist, Mailer has now developed what seems to be his very own theology. But the book does prompt a few questions I have on this topic:
        ellauri184.html on line 765: 1. When we think and describe God, is it proper to use glossary such as "happy", "content" etc that are supposed to describe human emotional states. Is it ok to make God this human? Angry jealous and vengeful are ok, of course, they´re used a lot in the Bible.
        ellauri184.html on line 767: Mailer is considering a God of Action, something of a Hemingway in deistic form who must prove himself with creative acts, a deity in the trenches, making mistakes, failing, succeeding, learning from his mistakes, constantly evolving.The God that interests Mailer is one guided by intuition no less than we, His creations whom we are said to resemble. Nuchem´s own self image to a jot.
        ellauri184.html on line 773: Jose Saramago is an atheist. This should be enough warning for everyone that desires to read the book. It is very explicit and so religion it’s exposed at its weakest and God as a character is revealed. I come from a Roman-Catholic background but I still wanted to read it, ever since the Gnostic gospel where Jesus childhood is revealed and he changes from a mischievous badly behaved kid to the Jesus from the new testament I wanted to see Saramago’s take on it. Saramago is such a master of words that he makes every bit of faith look totally illogical.
        ellauri184.html on line 775: It does not take long for us to find out that Saramago is extremely sharp at finding all contradictions on roman-catholic religion. In the novel God seems to be the greediest of all gods, the vainest, the most detached from his people. Detached even from his son as he appeared to him in different shapes, only in the meeting at the lake did he appear to him as a man. God does not command, he orders, he tricks his own son into following his plan to the end. Ultimately Jesus’s betrayal was his last act of martyrdom.
        ellauri184.html on line 779: José Saramago, therefore, gives us his vision of this unknown Jesus while reinterpreting in his sauce some biblical subjects. The result is probably not very canonical since we see a Jesus first educated by the Devil, then discovering sexuality in the arms of Mary Magdalene, a prostitute with whom he falls in love. However, I did not see any desire to satire: on the contrary, we discover a character torn by the codes of the society of his time, the gradual discovery of his identity, and above all, the feeling of being a toy of fate.
        ellauri184.html on line 781: The characters in the book are fascinating; my Jesuits friends and I laughed and enjoy this book. There were no doubts in our head by the end of the book. We did not feel like it shook our religion or affected the way we perceived God. This book was after all under fiction so everyone that is easily offended stay away from this book and stop complaining about blasphemy and crying around like little kids. Saramago is a Nobel price winner and foremost a grown man that is entitled to his own opinions. This one of his finest, if not the best, of his book in my opinion, a must read. Of course he is dead by now.
        ellauri184.html on line 783: Jesus having sex with Mary Magdalene in the whorehouse without the blessing of marriage. The demon asking Jesus to use a sheep for sexual release. An angel posing as a beggar during the Annunciation scene. The same beggar-angel walking with Mary to Bethlehem provoking jealousy to the doubting Joseph. Three shepherds instead of 3 kings visiting the family in the Bethlehem. Joseph crucified and dying on the cross mistaken as a zealot. Jesus seeing God in the desert. Jesus riding on the boat with the God and the Devil. These are some of the shocking deviations from the story that Saramago imagined and incorporated to come up with an “irreverent, profound, skeptical, funny, heretical, deeply philosophical, provocative and compelling work.” (Source: Harold Robbin who says that this is his favorite work of Saramago. So far, I agree).
        ellauri184.html on line 785: This is a bold fearless work and definitely not for the faint of heart. I am not surprised that when this was originally published in 1991, it created lots of controversies with the Catholic Church condemning Jose Saramago for harboring anti-religious vision and his own Portuguese government asking the European Literary Prize to remove this from its shortlist because of the book’s offensive content to religion. Despite this book’s existence, Saramago won the 1998 Nobel Prize for Literature.
        ellauri185.html on line 62: The Book of Samuel (Hebrew: ספר שמואל, Sefer Shmuel) is a book in the Hebrew Bible and two books (1 Samuel and 2 Samuel) in the Christian Old Testament. The book is part of the narrative history of Ancient Israel called the Deuteronomistic history, a series of books (Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings) that constitute a theological history of the Israelites and that aim to explain God's law for Israel under the guidance of the prophets.
        ellauri185.html on line 66: According to Jewish tradition, the book was written by Samuel, with additions by the prophets Gad and Nathan, who together are three prophets who had appeared within 1 Chronicles during the account of David's reign. Modern scholarly thinking posits that the entire Deuteronomistic history was composed circa 630–540 BCE by combining a number of independent texts of various ages.
        ellauri185.html on line 75: Tyre is listed among an alliance of ten nations that would conspire against God's people. Many Bible commentaries agree that this has not occurred yet historically and may be prophetic.
        ellauri185.html on line 91: Obviously, this wouldn’t be impressive if the prophecy came after the destruction of Tyre. So when did these things happen?
        ellauri185.html on line 93: Feel free to look it up yourself, but from what I can tell, everyone agrees that Ezekiel lived somewhere around 550 BC, and they mostly agree that Ezekiel himself wrote his book (as a ghost writer for JHWH). Of all the Old Testament prophets, they consider Ezekiel to be the most trustworthy (which is not saying much).
        ellauri185.html on line 95: What about the destruction of Tyre? Well, Nebuchadnezzer’s attack came shortly after Ezekiel, so it’s hard to tell for sure from our perspective whether or not Ezekiel truly prophesied that phase of Tyre’s destruction. But as far as Alexander is concerned, it is well established that this took place in 322 BC. So this is a clear example of the Bible foretelling an event (actually several) in detail.
        ellauri185.html on line 97: The book begins with Samuel's birth and Yahweh's call to him as a boy. The story of the Ark of the Covenant follows. It tells of Israel's oppression by the Philistines, which brought about Samuel's anointing of Saul as Israel's first king. But Saul proved unworthy, and God's choice turned to David, who defeated Israel's enemies, purchased the threshing floor where his son Solomon would build the First Temple, and brought the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem. Yahweh then promised David and his sucessors an everlasting dynasty.
        ellauri185.html on line 108: In Samuel's old age (wearing a Mitzpah bollock supporter) he appoints his sons Joel and Abijah as judges but, because of their corruption, the people ask for a king to rule over them. God directs Samuel to grant the people their wish despite his concerns: God gives them Saul from the tribe of Benjamin.
        ellauri185.html on line 113: Shortly thereafter, Saul leads Israel to a victory over Nahash of Ammon. Despite his numerous military victories, Saul disobeys Yahweh's instruction to destroy Amalek: Saul spares the Amalekite ruler and the best portion of the Amalekite flocks to present them as sacrifices. Samuel rebukes Saul and tells him that God has now chosen another man to be king of Israel.
        ellauri185.html on line 118: God tells Samuel to anoint David of Bethlehem as king, and David enters Saul's court as his armor-bearer and harpist. Saul's son and heir Jonathan befriends David and recognizes him as the rightful king. Saul then plots David's death, but David flees into the wilderness where he becomes a champion of the Hebrews. David joins the Philistines, but he continues to secretly champion his own people until Saul and Jonathan are killed in battle at Mount Gilboa.
        ellauri185.html on line 123: At this point, David offers a majestic eulogy, where he praises the bravery and magnificence of both his friend Jonathan and King Saul.
        ellauri185.html on line 127: The elders of Judah anoint David as king, but in the north Saul's son Ish-bosheth, or Ishbaal, rules over the northern tribes. After a long war, Ishbaal is murdered by Rechab and Baanah, two of his captains who hope for a reward from David. But David has them killed for killing God's anointed. David is then anointed king of all Israel.
        ellauri185.html on line 131: David captures Jerusalem and brings the Ark there. David wishes to build a temple, but Nathan tells him that one of his sons will be the one to build the temple. David defeats the enemies of Israel, slaughtering Philistines, Moabites, Edomites, Syrians, and Arameans.
        ellauri185.html on line 135: David commits adultery with Bathsheba, who becomes pregnant. When her husband Uriah the Hittite returns from battle, David encourages him to go home and see his wife (to cover his own tracks) but Uriah declines in case David might need him. David then deliberately sends Uriah on a suicide mission, and for this, Yahweh sends disasters against David's house. Nathan tells David that the sword shall never depart from his house.
        ellauri185.html on line 137: For the remainder of David's reign, problems occur. Amnon (one of David's sons) rapes his half-sister Tamar (one of David's daughters). Absalom (another son of David) kills Amnon and rebels against his father, whereupon David flees from Jerusalem. Absalom is killed following the Battle of the Wood of Ephraim, and David is restored as king and returns to his palace. Finally, only two contenders for the succession remain: Adonijah, son of David and Haggith, and Solomon, son of David and Bathsheba.
        ellauri185.html on line 157: The preserved confessions of this defendant, extracted under torture, refer at first only to conversations with Benito García in gaol and incriminate them only as Judaizers, but later start to refer to a piece of witchcraft performed about four years earlier (perhaps 1487), which involved the use of a consecrated host, stolen from a church in La Guardia, and the heart of a Christian boy.
        ellauri185.html on line 367: At the age of seven, he wanted to be a monk, and prayed fervently that his parents, who had by then lost their faith, should return to it.
        ellauri185.html on line 368: However, perturbed by the problem of evil, he lost his own faith at the age of eight, and turned to poetry-writing. Se oli Balliolin miehiä kuten parkinsonin vaivaama Nick Ostler. Evil ei ole mikään probleema ellei ole uskovaisia.
        ellauri185.html on line 373: Everyone ought to regard everyone with respect, that's all. Rispektiä kehiin kuten Saul Bellowin isoäitl Lauschilla. Rakastamisesta ei mitään puhetta. Oliko Parfit juutalainen? Ei vaan pikemminkin Olavi Pylkkänen. He was born in Chengdu, western China, where his parents, Jessie (nee Browne) and Norman Parfit practised preventive medicine in Christian missionary hospitals. Life partner Janet Richards believes Parfit had Asperger syndrome. He pledged to donate at least 10% of his income to effective charities. No brittejä ei verot paljon paina. Ehkä se säästi charityrahat parturimenoista.
        ellauri185.html on line 386: 33. Ajan nuoli tulee entropiasta, sanoo tiedenaiset. Aikakärpäset pitää siitä, se hajottaa kakan syötävämmäxi. Sitä mä en kyllä niele että se on vain meidän kokemus, se haiskahtaa idealismilta. No niin väittääkin vain joku insinööri Caltechistä ja joku itävaltalainen doldis. Säiliöllisellä kuumaa kaasua voi olla suuri entropia, mutta avaruudella joka sisältää sellaisia säiliöiltä se on pieni. Keskeistä ei ole tietojemme puutteellisuus perkele. Ei todennäköisyyskään ole mitään tietoa, se on vain tapahtumien jakautumista. Abigail ei ymmärrä asiasta höykäsen pölähtämää. Se on aivan hakoteillä, persreikä enemmän kuin oljen verran raollaan idealismin suuntaan.
        ellauri185.html on line 396: While atheists Richard Dawkins and Victor J. Stenger have criticised Davies' public stance on science and religion, others, including the John Templeton Foundation, have praised his work. The John Templeton Foundation is a philanthropic organization that reflects the ideas of its founder, John Templeton, who became wealthy via a career as a contrarian investor, and wanted to support progress in religious and spiritual knowledge, especially at the intersection of religion and science.
        ellauri185.html on line 406: Steven Arthur Pinker (born September 18, 1954) is a Canadian-American cognitive psychologist, psycholinguist, popular science author and public intellectual. He is an advocate of evolutionary psychology and the computational theory of mind. Enlightenment Now (2018) uses social science data to show a general improvement of the human condition over recent history brought by Western reason, science and humanism plus colonialism. Pinker on Hararin sielunveli, ne siteeraavat toisiaan. Pahuus on sitä mukaa vähentynyt kun jenkkihegemonia on vahvistunut. Vitun fariseuxet.
        ellauri185.html on line 408: Pinker was born in Montreal, Quebec, in 1954, to a middle-class Jewish family. His grandparents emigrated to Canada from Poland and Romania in 1926, and owned a small necktie factory in Montreal. His father was a lawyer. His mother eventually became a high-school vice-principal. His brother is a policy analyst for the Canadian government, while his sister, Susan Pinker, is a psychologist and writer who authored The Sexual Paradox and The Village Effect.
        ellauri185.html on line 432: 41. Mixi olemme epäloogisia? Puhukaa vain izestänne. Graham Lawless kannattaa National Rifle Associationia, sen on kaikki mitä noista väärennetyistä luvuista voi päätellä. 2000-luvulla ei enää yritetäkään prosenttilaskua. Suolapitoisuus ilmoitetaan grammoina hehtogrammassa. Steven Pinkerkin oli kauhistua, mutta huh, data olikin väärennettyä. No se on siihen tottunut. Ilmastonmuutoxen kieltäjät ovat kuuroja tieteellisille faktoille. NRA:n paukkina on kuurouttanut ne. Taloustilanteiden järkiperäiseen käsittelyyn on peliteoriaa ja niin edelleen. Ei siihen mitään marxismia tarvita. Ovatko epärationaaliset uskomuxet pääsemässä niskan päälle? Kyllä selvästi! Uskoon, toivoon ja rakkauteen liittyvän sanaston käyttö on kasvanut somessa räjähdysmäisesti, ja tietoon, laskelmointiin ja tunnekylmyyteen liittyvät on pahasti tappiolla. Samoin 1. ja 2. persoonan pronominien suhteessa kolmanteen. Siitä kiitän Sinuas Herra! Seurauxena on yliluonnollisia uskomuxia, valeuutisia ja salaliittoteorioita. Näemme sen mitä haluamme nähdä. Will to believe. Usko on luja luottamus siihen mitä ei näe. Absurdimpi parempi.
        ellauri185.html on line 464: Kysytään ehkä mitä maxaa näita iänikuisia asioita enää toistaa? Sixi että ne eivät tule koskaan vanhoixi. Apina ei opi historiasta yhtään mitään, kuten Toynbee totesi. Kazotaan vaikka tätä Ukrainan selkkauxen Suomessa herättämää aateilmastoa. On kuin isäimme henget olisivat nousseet kumpujen yöstä vieteriukkoina. Porukoilla on kahmaloittain käyttämätöntä libidoa kiitos vuosikausien koronaselibaatin ja laahuxen luisumisen maahanmuuton ansiosta B-kansalaisixi. Ja nyt sille kaikelle löytyy äkkiä hyötykäyttöä! Nyzaa öykkäröidä oikein luvan kanssa kun on saatu taas ulkomainen vihollinen.
        ellauri185.html on line 478: 1.Ei saa vihastua eikä nahistella.1.Älä tapa.
        ellauri185.html on line 499: Ei kyllä tässä Lexa lipsahtaa pahasti marxisti-leninistien linjoille, niin aatelismies kuin onkin. Nehän koittivat houkutella köige maade proletaarlase yhinöimään siskonpetissä. Vaan pieleen meni, hahaa! Kapitaalilla yhdistyminen sensijaan on mennyt mainiosti: pääoma purjehtii sujuvasti liputtomilla laivoilla, eikä rahalla ole passin tarvetta. Isänmaita puretaan uutterasti vapaakauppasopimuxilla, ja kohta kaikki solkkaavat huonoa englantia. End of history, Fukuyama, Pinker ja Harari lyövät kättä Tolstoin ja Leninin luiden yli.
        ellauri185.html on line 542: Kaikki omaisuus, mutta ennen kaikkea maa-omaisuus, on syntynyt väkivaltaista tietä (maa on valloituksilla anastettu, sitten luovutettu tai myyty). Koko Israelin historia on tästä hyvää näyttöä. Sen vuoksi on turhaa yrittääkään selittää sitä oikeuteen perustuvaksi. Se on todellisuudessa vain karkeaa riistoa, jota voimakkaat ja aseistetut harjoittavat heikkoja ja aseettomia kohtaan" (E.m.t. S. 21). Mitä hittoa, oikeuteen se juuri perustuu, vahvemman nimittäin.
        ellauri185.html on line 720: Luterilaisten oppi-isä on teologian historian ahkerin eritepuheen ja alapääretoriikan harrastaja. Ulosteperäinen retoriikka soi miehen kirkkosaarnoissa ja julkisissa kirjoissa. Vielä ruskeampi kieli heilui yksityisissä keskusteluissa ja kirjeissä.
        ellauri185.html on line 753: history-perspective.com/time_in_egypt.html">Aikajana
        ellauri185.html on line 781: In this scene from the biblical book of Exodus, Moses and Aaron (upper right) visit the pharaoh, who is mourning his son. The Egyptian ruler’s son had died from one of the plagues sent by God to secure the Israelites’ release from Egypt. The gloom of the painting reflects the father’s intense grief.
        ellauri185.html on line 798: The firstborn of a mother is referred to in the Bible (Exodus 13:2) as one who “opens the womb” of his mother. Jacob and Esau vied for right of way through Rebecca's birth canal. Esau won that set, but the game went to Jacob.
        ellauri185.html on line 802: Ever since Adam, the very first human being, died, God has assigned his highest-ranking angel–Michael–to escort human souls to heaven, say believers. Musta enkeli vei päivänsankarin.
        ellauri185.html on line 813: The supreme archangel Michael. Therefore, the first creation by God was the supreme archangel followed by other archangels, who are identified with lower intellects, IQ in the range 80-100. Gabriel is rumored to have been the biological father of both Virgin Mary and her son. He was not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but a looker, and a slick customer, like his mate, who humped Lysia while Gabriel was talking up her mother.
        ellauri185.html on line 834: One passage that offers some insight regarding birth defects can be found in John 9:2-3: "And his disciples asked him, 'Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?' Jesus answered, 'It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him.'" It is clear from these words of Jesus that birth defects are ultimately not due to the sin of the parents or child, but serve as part of God's plan for our lives. If not for the defective person as such, then at least for the greater common good. Defective persons are prohibited from entering the holiest of the holy.
        ellauri185.html on line 840: Of the practicing regions, Middle Eastern and northern Africa territories show the greatest frequencies of consanguinity. The link between the high frequency and the region is primarily due to the dominance of Islamic populations, who have historically engaged in familyline relations.
        ellauri185.html on line 846: Instead, certain body odours are connected to human sexual attraction. Humans can make use of body odour subconsciously to identify whether a potential mate will pass on favourable traits to their offspring. Body odour may provide significant cues about the genetic quality, health and reproductive success of a potential mate. Body odour affects sexual attraction in a number of ways including through human biology, the menstrual cycle and fluctuating asymmetry. The olfactory membrane plays a role in smelling and subconsciously assessing another human's pheromones. It also affects the sexual attraction of insects and mammals. The major histocompatibility complex genes are important for the immune system, and appear to play a role in sexual attraction via body odour. Studies have shown that body odor is strongly connected with attraction in heterosexual females. The women in one study ranked body odor as more important for attraction than “looks”. Humans may not simply depend on visual and verbal senses to be attracted to a possible partner/mate. That's hard science, no pseudo, mate!
        ellauri185.html on line 855: In Leader's Bellow biography Vol 2, “Love and Strife,” the novel “Herzog” is published on the very first page and reaches No. 1 on the best-seller list, supplanting John le Carré’s ‘The Spy Who Came In From the Cold.’ Never again would Bellow, about to turn 50 years old, lack for wealth, power, awards or flunkies to stand by him, ready to take his coat and do his bidding. The temptation for someone in his position was to become an insufferable, spoiled monster. And Bellow quickly gave in to temptation.
        ellauri185.html on line 857: Bellow’s bad temper in the late ’60s was by no means directed exclusively at would-be biographers, radical students and aggrieved wives. Bellow had so many targets to attack, whether insulting them face to face or in blistering letters or put-downs circulated through intermediaries. One of his favorite one-liners ran: “Let’s you and him fight.” The most salient recipients of Bellow’s bad temper in this biography were his three sons, each from a different mother — the oldest 21 when this volume starts, the youngest just 1 year old and about to be abandoned after yet another divorce.
        ellauri185.html on line 859: The celebrated writer kept romances alive in different cities, two or three at any given time — with students and faculty divorcées at the University of Chicago, assistants at The New Yorker, even his housecleaner. A dreary train of affairs.
        ellauri185.html on line 861: Bellow didn’t just model some main characters on famous friends, but all characters were taken from life. He was in many ways a very thoughtful and kind person, but I think his need to be the top dog, the best, was very deep.
        ellauri185.html on line 863: The irony in Bellow’s soul was that he craved love and experience, and learned to view people coldly and clinically. The writer Amos Oz recalled most vividly from his friendship with Bellow an exchange that they shared privately about death. “I said I was hoping to die in my sleep, but Saul responded by saying that, on the contrary, he would like to die wide awake and fully conscious, because his death is such a crucial experience he wouldn’t want to miss it.”
        ellauri185.html on line 865: As previous biographers have discovered, it’s difficult to write an endearing biography of Bellow. “Was I a man or was I a jerk?” Bellow inquired on his deathbed. The answer should be obvious.
        ellauri188.html on line 81: The inhabitants historically made a living by fishing, collecting shellfish, hunting birds, and gardening. They relied heavily on breadfruit but raised at least 32 other introduced crops.
        ellauri188.html on line 120: He invites correspondence, hence this communication. Mr. Wester refers to statements in the romantic "White Shadows in the South Seas," and to the inter- esting article by Church in the Geographie for Octo- ber, 1919, and mentions Church's prediction that in ten years from that date "there would not be a full- blooded Marquesan alive." If taken literally, this would mean that the year 1929 or 1930 will witness the extinction of all pare-blooded Marquesans, and consequently, very shortly after, according to Wester, the gradual dying out of all Marquesan breadfruit.
        ellauri188.html on line 124: The present population of all the six inhabited islands of that group of eleven, numbers, according to Mr. Frank Varney, a long-time resident on Hivaon, about 1,000 or 1,200. Only a small proportion of these are pure bloods, most of that number being natives from the Tuamotus or the Society Islands, and many of them are half-bloods or quarter-bloods, Chinese features being very common. But I met many middle-aged, elderly and old, pure-blooded Mar quesans, a fine, self-respecting race, commanding our admiration and pity. I can not believe that all these people, whom I saw in 1922 and 1923, will have vanished in 1930. It will take a longer time than that, perhaps only a few years longer, before the last pure blooded Marquesan steps off the stage. I am quite sure that Dr. Linton, of the Field Museum, and Dr. Handy, of Bishop Museum, Honolulu, both of whom have made special study of the Marquesans, will agree with me in this.
        ellauri188.html on line 126: But what is more to the point under discussion is that Mr. Wester evidently overlooks the fact that many of these pure bloods are leaving descendants, mixed bloods, to be sure, but just as much interested in the preservation of their ancient food, the bread fruit, as were their ancestors. Will not this fact tend to preserve these trees for a long time to come?
        ellauri188.html on line 128: I found the breadfruit abundant on all the islands visited (fortunately, I was not obliged to eat poipoi) somewhat dwarfed when growing in the "jungle" in neglected valleys, but an enormous and noble tree when given space. The "jungle" of the Marquesas, by the way (although the islands are between 8 and 11 degrees south latitude) is by no means a tropical jungle as the latter is usually pictured, but is made up very largely of young and old and dying and dead specimens of the Fau, or Purao tree, a native hibiscus which grows to a large size, and is much used by the natives for building. One does not see, in the Marquesas, the rank, choking growths peculiar to Brazil, Central America and other really tropical countries. The appearance of the valleys in that group is more subtropical than tropical, and hence, while this growth may dwarf the breadfruit to a greater or less extent, it does not seem that it would always be fatal to its existence.
        ellauri188.html on line 130: It is perhaps appropriate to describe briefly, in this connection, the agricultural conditions in Typee Vai, the valley on Nukuhiva made famous by Melville's classie "Typee." It will be remembered by those who have read his narrative that he escaped from his ship. in Taiohae Bay in 1842 and was held a prisoner for many months by the eannibals of Typee. At that time he figured the inhabitants of the valley as repre sented by about 2,000 souls, with perhaps 2,000 more in the neighboring valley of Houmi. A period of 80 years has elapsed (not a long time historically) be tween his sojourn there and my visit in 1922. In November of that year I found 44 people in Typee, and 65 in Houmi, though from Pere Simeon Delmar, the charming and self-sacrificing priest at Taiohae, who is in close touch with all his people, I learned. that the death rate in Typee had been normal for several years and that one or two families there had many children. I was astonished at the appearance of Typee Valley; for, from reading "White Shadows" and from
        ellauri188.html on line 136: the lower part. As I stood on the ridge between Happar Valley and Typee and looked down into the latter, I was not only amazed at seeing evidence of comparative prosperity, though in a limited area, where I expected utter- desolation, but I was deeply impressed with the agricultural possibilities of this historic region.
        ellauri188.html on line 137: Finally, I believe the most significant factor in this matter of the preservation of breadfruit, both in the Marquesas and Society Islands, is the presence in the
        ellauri188.html on line 140: I will venture to say that in ten years Tahiti, picturesque and romantic for so long a time, will have lost its charm because of the presence of hordes of low-caste Chinese and half-bloods. However unattractive this may be from the standpoint of the tourist and sentimentalist, there is no contradicting the fact that they will make these islands a thousand times more productive than would the pure-blooded native, and their skill and habits of application will undoubtedly extend to the preservation of the breadfruit. The Chinese and half-blood Chinese are on all the Marquesan islands which are inhabited, and it will be to their financial interest as well as to the interest of their personal food supply, to preserve the breadfruit there as well as in the Societies. It is notable that the cocoanut and banana plantations and papaye (papaw) groves in Typee at the time of my visit, were either owned or worked by Chinese or half-bloods (Chinese + Tahitian or Chinese + Marquesan).
        ellauri188.html on line 142: Referring to the last paragraph in Mr. Wester's communication-It would appear that if one is dependent, as was the writer, upon trading schooners to get from Tahiti to the Marquesas, then amongst these islands and return to Tahiti, his program for work in these two groups would take more than a year and his estimate of expense might, in consequence, be exceeded. Sometimes one is obliged to wait from one month to three to get the opportunity to move from one island in the Marquesas to another forty or fifty or eighty miles away, so rare and uncertain are the visits of these schooners. Further, in the absence of any regular means of communication, one has to seize any chance opportunity of transportation or run the risk of being marooned for a long period. On the other hand, if a schooner were chartered, which is the best possible way of visiting and working among the South Sea Islands, schooner, captain, crew and provisions would cost about $1,000 per month (this figure was obtained from an authoritative source) and a year on shipboard might not be needed. Under such conditions Mr. Wester's calculation of $8,500 for a year's work in the Marquesas and Societies may not be far out of the way.
        ellauri188.html on line 181: Lähivuosikymmeniin sijoittavalla elokuvalla Disney ottaa tavallaan kantaa myös omaan historiaansa. Sen kuuluisimmat animaatiot on aikoinaan tehty saduista, joiden opetukset ovat nykyään tunkkaisempaa sorttia.
        ellauri188.html on line 273: HS Kirjasto|Viikon kirja nostaa esiin nykyajan vääristyneen suhteen tarinoihin – Runeberg-voittaja on vaikuttava romaani. Koripallo|Lauri Markkasen Cavaliersilla paras NBA-kausi neljään vuoteen – LeBron Jamesin edellä historiallisella listalla enää yksi nimi
        ellauri188.html on line 302: Tabun takia markiisittaret eivät saaneet käyttää venettä. Tabu haha, sama tabu minkä tautta saudittaret ei saa(neet) ajaa autoa eikä kävellä yxin kadulla ilman isää aviomiestä poikaa tai veljeä. Kylnää tabut tiedetään. Muut ei saa päästä "mun" kaikkein pyhimpään, mun Marilynin hurlumheihin. Vittu et mua ottaa päähän kaikenlainen pyhistely. Puhtaasti reviiristä siinä on kymysys.
        ellauri188.html on line 372:

        Mr. Melvill and his Prick


        ellauri188.html on line 388: Melvillestä tuli paikallinen kuuluisuus Lansingburghissa hänen Tyynenmeren tarinoidensa ansiosta. Ystävät ja kylänmiehet innostivat häntä kirjoittamaan seikkailuistaan kuin Muumipappa, ja hänen ensimmäinen teoksensa Taipii – kappale polynesialaisten elämää julkaistiin 1846. Kirjasta tuli suosittu, vaikka yhdysvaltalainen Harper and Brothers ei suostunutkaan julkaisemaan sitä. Kirja julkaistiin Lontoossa, ja sitä myytiin noin 6 000 kappaletta myös Yhdysvalloissa. Kirjaa myös pääasiassa kehuttiin, vaikka esimerkiksi Britanniassa sen todenmukaisuutta epäiltiin ja Yhdysvalloissa vastustettiin sen esittämää kritiikkiä lähetystyöntekijöitä kohtaan. Vuonna 1847 Melville avioitui Elizabeth Shaw’n kanssa. He saivat neljä lasta, kaksi poikaa ja kaksi tytärtä.
        ellauri188.html on line 399: Melvillin havainnollisesta kirjasta tulee värikkäitä flashbackeja. Nuku Hivan maisemat on kuin Coleridgen eroottinen runo Xanadu. Syvät ja romanttiset rotkot joissa koski kohisee, tiedetään. Zolan papin ruokaemäntä Teuse ja sen törkyinen apupappi pelasivat aina sotaa. Se oli ainut peli jota emäntä osasi, pip-pelin lisäxi.
        ellauri188.html on line 412: The power of positive thinking. Joshua Lucas "Easy Dent" Maurer (1971-) had to smile so much in The Secret: Dare to Dream that he had to have an operation to reset his mouth afterwards. The lead lady's mouth operation had been a semi failure.
        ellauri188.html on line 415: Josh's other projects included the horror-thriller Child of Darkness, Child of Light, an adaptation of Paterson's novel Virgin, a tale of two Catholic virgin schoolgirls, that folded when they were both found pregnant under mysterious and supernatural circumstances. To avoid being caught red "handed" Lucas relocated to Australia to play the hot "headed" American cousin Luke McGregor opposite Andrew Clarke and Guy Pearce in the first season of the family western Snowy River: The McGregor Saga. Lucas appeared in all 13 episodes of the first season, but claimed in a later interview that despite the friendly reception by Rhonda Byrne, he was homesick for the United States, and his character was killed off in the second episode of season 2.
        ellauri188.html on line 417: The second part of his career began with a lead role in the British rowing film Big Blue (released in the US as Miracle and as Debacle at Oxford), in which he played a hotshot Navy rower who recruited another American, "Toby", to help US win our annual round Nuku Hiva boat race with the Frenchies.
        ellauri188.html on line 418: He also appeared in an off-Broadway production of Terrence McNally's slightly controversial Corpus Christi killers, a retelling of the Passion Fruit, with the Jesus character (named Joshua) and his disciples ALL being gay. Lucas played the role of Judas as a gay predator.
        ellauri188.html on line 420: Right before the play was to open, Lucas was mugged and beaten "on his way to the theater" for "dress rehearsal". He played the role of Judas with bloody bandages across his broken nose and black eyes. The audience thought the bandages were part of the play.
        ellauri188.html on line 422: Following a series of half hearted operations to reset his nose, he began gathering larger roles in films like American Psycho, The Weight of Water, Session 9, The Dancer, and When Strangers Appear You Can Count on Me.
        ellauri188.html on line 424: In 2011, Lucas co-starred with Elizabeth Taylor in the film Red Dog, based on the true story of an Australian kelpie. Lucas won an Inside Animal Award for his role as the dog. For this part, he gainede more than 100 lbs in weight.
        ellauri188.html on line 431: Lucasilla on rooli Arto Halosen ohjaamassa ja käsikirjoittamassa elokuvassa The Guardian Angel – Suojelusenkeli, joka ilmestyy vuonna 2018. Paizi ei näy sen filmografiassa. Suomen elokuvateatterilevityksessä se sai 11 881 katsojaa. Siinä pahis hypnotisoija saa pokat pahantekoon selittämällä eze paha onkin jotain hyvää. Niin aina. Power of positive thinking.
        ellauri188.html on line 436: Jopa ulkomuodoltaan Toby veti minua puoleensa, sillä kun valtaosa miehistöstä oli yhtä karkeaa ulkoiselta olemukseltaan kuin hengeltäänkin Toby oli harvinaisen hauskannäköinen. Siniseen matruusintakkiin ja purjekangashousuihin sonnustautuneena hän näytti niin tyylikkäältä merimieheltä ettei häntä tyylikkäämpää ollut taatusti koskaan nähty yhdenkään laivan kannella; hän oli pieni ja sirotekoinen ja hänen vartensa oli tavattoman notkea. Hänen jo luonnostaan tumma ihonsa oli paahtunut tropiikin auringossa, ja pikimustien kutrien kimppu laskeutui hänen ohimoilleen ja sai hänen kookkaat tummat silmänsä näyttämään entistä tummemmilta. Hän oli omituinen ja itsepäinen, oikukas, ailahteleva ja haikea-joskus jopa synkkämielinen. Hänellä oli myös kiivas ja tuima luonne ja suuttuessaan hän suuttui silmittömästi.
        ellauri188.html on line 438: Aidon väkevillä tunteilla on kummallinen valta heikkoihin luonteisiin. Olin säikähtänyt useinkin sen hennon poikasen hillitöntä raivonpuuskaa. Viime aikoina olin havainnut Tobyn synkkämielisyyden suuresti lisääntyneen ja saarelle saavuttuamme olin monesti nähnyt hänen silmäilevän kaihoisasti minua samalla kun muu miehistö elämöi kannen alla.
        ellauri189.html on line 45: Volynia (ukr. Волинь, Volyn, puol. Wołyń) on historiallinen alue, joka sijaitsee Länsi-Ukrainassa ja Kaakkois-Puolassa Pripet- ja Bugjokien välissä Galitsian ja Podolian pohjoispuolella. Alue on Euroopan vanhimpia slaavien asuttamia seutuja. Volynia on metsäinen ja järvinen alue.lähde?
        ellauri189.html on line 47: Volynia muodosti pohjoisosan historiallisesta Galitsian ja Volynian ruhtinaskunnasta. Volynian alue käsittää nykyisin Ukrainan Volynian ja Rivnen alueet, osia Žytomyrin ja Ternopylin alueista sekä osia Itä-Puolasta.
        ellauri189.html on line 51: Kiovan Venäjä eli Kiovan Rusj oli Itä-Euroopassa 880-luvulta 1100-luvun puoliväliin olemassa ollut valtakunta. Valtakunta oli pääasiassa itäslaavilainen. 800- ja 900-luvuilla skandinaavisilla ruseilla oli kuitenkin Kiovan Venäjän kehittymisessä huomattava, joskin kiistelty, rooli. Valtakuntaan kuului merkittäviä suomalais-ugrilaisia ja turkinsukuisia kansoja. Valtiota voidaan historiallisesti pitää Venäjän, Valko-Venäjän ja Ukrainan edeltäjänä, joskaan suoraa yhteyttä ei ole. (Arvasit oikein - tämä on reviiripoliittinen kuuma peruna!)
        ellauri189.html on line 53: Nykyinen länkkärimielinen historiantutkimus ei halua liioitella Kiovan Venäjän samankaltaisuutta myöhemmän venäläisyyden kanssa. Tästä syystä historiantutkija Jukka Korpela on suositellut valtakunnan suomalaiseksi nimeksi aiempien historiankirjoittajien antaman nimen Kiovan Venäjä sijaan muotoa Kiovan Rusj. LOL Hahaa! Kiovan ryssä siis! Iso parannus!
        ellauri189.html on line 55: Jukka Korpelan mukaan venäläinen historiankirjoitus historian kulusta on liian pelkistetty, johon kukaan vakavasti otettava tutkija ei suhtaudu vakavasti. Vanhat kertomukset ja legendat Moskovan Venäjän ajoilta lähtien muuttuivat totuudeksi 1800-luvulla ja edelleen Venäjän viralliseksi historiaksi muun muassa kouluopetukseen ja oppikirjoihin aina nykypäivään asti. Sen mukaan on syntynyt virheellinen todellisuuskuva (siis todellinen virheellisyyskuva), jonka mukaan venäläiset, valkovenäläiset ja ukrainalaiset muodostaisivat Kiovan Venäjän pohjalta yhden kansan. Sehän ei pidä lainkaan paikkaansa! Kansoja oli vähintään tusina ellei enemmän!
        ellauri189.html on line 57: Jukka Jari Korpela (s. 10. huhtikuuta 1957 Helsinki) jota ei pidä sekoittaa paasajan ikäiseen Esko Jukka "Yucca" Korpelaan, free-lance käpistelijään ja matematiikan kandidaattiin Espoosta, josta on ollut jo puhetta albumissa 139), on Itä-Suomen yliopiston yleisen historian professori ja historiantutkija. Hän on erikoistunut keskiaikaiseen vallanmuodostukseen ja siihen liittyviin pyhimyskultteihin.
        ellauri189.html on line 70: Antoni Malczewski (3 June 1793 – 2 May 1826) was a Polish romantic poet, known for his only work, "a narrative poem of dire pessimism", Maria (1825).
        ellauri189.html on line 73: At the times, prominent and scandalizing was his autodestructive romance with a married woman, Zofia Rucińska, who had a mental illness.
        ellauri189.html on line 75: After leaving the army, he spent several years traveling through western Europe, staying some time in Paris, climbing Mont Blanc in 1818, and spending a good portion of his inherited fortune. He returned to his estate in Volhynia in 1821, where he began an ill-fated affair with a married woman and began writing. He moved to Warsaw in 1824, where he published the poetic novel Maria at his own expense in 1825, and died in poverty the next year in unclear circumstances.
        ellauri189.html on line 77: "Maria" was hailed by the younger generation as one of the first authentic literary products of Polish romanticism (the adherents of the so-called Warsaw Classicism were, on the contrary, horrified by the dark plot and the author’s preference for “provincial” words and expressions). Malczewski was then already in poor health and, before a year had passed, in May 1826, he died – impoverished and disgraced because of his affair with a hysterical married woman (whom he was supposed to heal by means of mesmerism – after his death she returned to her husband).
        ellauri189.html on line 79: In 1825 Antoni Malczewski published a long poem, Maria (Marya: A Tale of the Ukraine), which constitutes his only contribution to Polish poetry but occupies a permanent place there as a widely imitated example of the so-called Polish-Ukrainian poetic school. In the poem, Wacław, a young husband, goes to fight the Tatars and, after routing the raiders, hurries home to his wife, Maria. All he finds is a cold corpse. Yeah, great. Oh fuck. What's the use. The poem makes use of diversified rhythms and carefully chosen rhymes; and its Byronic hero, as well as its picture of Ukraine as a land of sombre charm, assured Malczewski both popularity and critical applause.
        ellauri189.html on line 81: It is generally held to be most influenced by Lord Byron, whom Malczewski had met in Venice during his travels around western Europe, though it is considerably more gloomy and Gothic than Byron's work. Malczewski is sometimes considered part of the "Ukrainian school" in Polish poetry, though others consider his work to stand uniquely separate. Maria was also influential on later Polish poets, especially Adam Mickiewicz, and on writer Joseph Conrad, although he was not a romantic as such. Well, some of his stuff is pretty gooey, like Nostromo, the Panamanian guy.
        ellauri189.html on line 84: scenery, especially the so-called Dzikie Pola (“Waste Fields”), a vast area in the South-West of the Ukraine, bordered by the rivers Dnieper and Dniester, where the Russian tanks now sit stuck in the mud. In the seventeenth century it was scarcely populated and continually raided by the Tartars from the Crimea. The Cossacks, who defended this borderland, were originally allies of Poland. However, they resented their disdainful treatment by the szlachta (the Polish gentry) and particularly the magnates, who owned large manors with serfs.
        ellauri189.html on line 93: In the first line of Malczewski’s tale we meet a Cossack with a bold look in his eyes (“Zapał jakiś rozżarza twojej twarzy śniadość”; “Some rapture kindles your tanned face”)
        ellauri189.html on line 97: “Simple was his bow, short his salutation; however, he seemed different from
        ellauri189.html on line 98: the band of servants, a subject – he took his freedom from his father’s loins,
        ellauri189.html on line 99: and, with a proud expression in his eyes, demanded to be brought to the squire,
        ellauri189.html on line 102: However, in Maria the tensions arising from differences in “class” are not taken up. Malczewski investigates man’s existential plight in connection with the “stigma” (as would Norwid put it) that has been imprinted on man by his “natural” surroundings (as we will see, the Cossack represents man before self-alienation,
        ellauri189.html on line 110: dignity). The pair has secretly got married, but their bond is not accepted by the arrogant wojewoda. When his attempts to force his son to a divorce have failed, he feigns to accept reconciliation with his son Wacław, who is – as a sign of the re-established peace – sent at the head of a regiment of hussars into the Dzikie Pola to drive out the Tartars.
        ellauri189.html on line 112: Before engaging in battle Wacław visits his father-in-law and Maria (who slowly fades away, feeding on an ever-diminishing hope) to bring them the good news. The patriotic miecznik cannot, in spite of his advanced age, refrain from joining the band of his son-in-law, leaving his home and daughter without protection. The Tartars are finally (but not without difficulty) defeated and Wacław, in exultant mood, rides by night over the boundless steppe to unite with his wife as the messenger of victory. When he arrives, the manor-house of the miecznik appears to be abandoned. There are no signs of life. Entering a room, he discovers Maria, lying on a couch, her clothes in disorder, like a marble statue. It is evident that her vital strength has been extinguished, but he tries to make himself believe that she has only fainted and rushes out of the house, shouting: “O, water, water!”. Thereupon the “small figure” of a melancholy youth (“pacholę”) jumps from the thicket and relates to Wacław the events that have happened.
        ellauri189.html on line 114: It becomes clear that the apparent benevolence of the wojewoda was only a ruse to lure away the defenders from Maria’s home. During their absence his brigands, disguised as revellers (taking part in a kulig, a sort of carnival cortege of the szlachta moving about the countryside), had raided the house, carried Maria away and drowned her in a pond. Her dead body was found by the tenants and servants who had left it on the bed before they went in pursuit of the perpetrators of the crime. And so “Wacław loses in one moment everything on the world,/ Happiness, virtue, respect for his fellow-men and brothers” (“I tak Wacław od razu wszystko w świecie traci:/ Szczęście, cnotę, szacunek dla ludzi, swych braci”). It is suggested that in the “dark and dreary wood of human feelings” (“W tym
        ellauri189.html on line 117: miecznik keeping a wake at the graves of his wife and daughter. Overwhelmed
        ellauri189.html on line 120: not heed this call anymore – his death is imminent:
        ellauri189.html on line 141: dome with the terrestrial plain. In this space that is both boundless and hermetic (when we attempt to translate existential qualities that are experienced
        ellauri189.html on line 143: heterogeneous concept) man enacts the drama of his life. The borders of this realm are indicated by the movement of the sun, arising from behind the horizon and, after moving through half of its orbit, again setting beyond this infinitely receding meeting point between heaven and earth. In Malczewski’s
        ellauri189.html on line 153: Upon a ranch he rested as he went along his way

        ellauri189.html on line 166: As the riders loped on by him, he heard one call his name

        ellauri189.html on line 180: (And when they have reached the plain – where the sun has rolled his immense
        ellauri189.html on line 196: (The sun had already walked along his wide curve and tinged the grey clouds with a crimson glow; with a yellow light quivering over earth and water, he burnt, setting, on his rich throne. Already his look, full of wonder, does not blind, but spreads mild, visible rays and, taking a short farewell, before burying himself in the deep, he allows mortal eyes to look at him; still – during this last moment he does not hastily disappear, [for he wants] to nourish all creatures with a smile of life; still he glances through the windows in
        ellauri189.html on line 199: The centre of our planetary system is the visible sign of the infinity of immanence and contains the cyclical essence of being, not merely indicating this con-dition, but also embodying it: this celestial body is subject to an infinite movement without apparent linear direction. But the stages of the sun’s voyage could also be interpreted as stages of human life (birth, youth, maturity, old age) and this circumstance inclines man to perceive a similarity between a celestial body and a feeling sublunary body (does man deceive himself, thinking it a bond of
        ellauri189.html on line 206: Malczewski’s worldview (Weltanschauung) seems at first sight very much akin to Schopenhauer’s metaphysical pessimism (the fact that the German philosopher’s main treatise Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung was almost neglected by his contemporaries, should not close our eyes to the fact that the first part of it was written immediately after the Napoleonic wars; it belongs to the same époque as Maria).
        ellauri189.html on line 209: with its receding horizon, melting into heaven, shows two different countenances of infinity. Man may spontaneously recognize the identity of linear and cyclical infinity, but the basis of this identity is not an empirically established fact, but an assumption, a matter of belief. The wheel of Karma is not so different from Schopenhauers endless rounds of the lush parks of Frankfurt following the dark star behind his poodle Atman.
        ellauri189.html on line 214: The boundless steppe of the Ukraine turns out to be a cage with invisible bars. Man appears at first sight to be free, without apparent goal roaming over the plain of life, being a lord of the steppe, “a king of the wilderness” (“król pustyni”), or tries to create in a premeditated manner his own future, deciding – by the way – on the fate of his fellow men (the source of unceasing conflicts). However, in the latter case he often unwittingly obeys the voice of his own wild, unruly nature. The ambivalence of this situation seems to be intimately connected with the concept of romantic irony. Man possesses the ability to objectify his passions, i.e. he can explain them psychologically, by means of a chain of causes and effects, but he still remains the slave of this volitional nature that constitutes his innermost self, always and ever receding (like the horizon of the Ukrainian plain) when he tries to catch it (the idea of the Unconscious does not really explain this “schizophrenic” state of mind – it merely affirms man’s essential homelessness: I am myself, when I realize that my self eternally escapes me). - I can relate to that, says the Russian tank driver sitting stuck in the Ukrainian mud.
        ellauri189.html on line 216: The male protagonists of Maria (in particular the wojewoda and his son Wacław
        ellauri189.html on line 219: perpetrators and victims) shows the illusoriness of this conviction.
        ellauri189.html on line 221: his aim of destroying his son’s misalliance, “brooding” on it in the “underworld” of his perverse mind (the treacherous heart of the wojewoda, who seems to be all smile, is compared to a “wine-cellar” [“loch”]; a more usual meaning of “loch”
        ellauri189.html on line 224: straight line and a curve – of the visible world; so even here this celestial body seems to share in an aspect of the human condition:
        ellauri189.html on line 250: Jadwiga Maria Kinga Bal (Balowa) of Zaleszczyki, née Brunicka (July 26, 1879 – January 1, 1955) was a Polish baroness and a lifelong muse of Jacek Malczewski, considered Poland's national painter. She served as the live model for a series of his symbolic portrayals of women, as well as nude studies and mythological beings. Most were completed before the interwar period when Poland had not yet achieved independence.
        ellauri189.html on line 256: Iga rated it did not like it Oct 27. It was only after his death that critics realized the originality of Mary, by Malczeski – released in 1825 – that it was in fact the first Polish narrative poem. The injury of an ankle, which Malczewski had sustained defending his lover’s good name, destroyed the writer’s military career; the injury returned and he could not participate in Napoleon’s campaign against Russia in 1812.
        ellauri189.html on line 258: Aga rated it it was ok Mar 22, I love all the motifs, the atmosphere and the time period. Fascinated by Byron, Malczewski used complicated narration, an odd sequence of events, blanks, ambiguities and puzzles in his work.
        ellauri189.html on line 302: Vaihtoehtoista historian kulkua ei tietenkään voi tietää, mutta vertaamalla toisen vaihtoehdon valinneisiin voi päätellä miten todennäköisesti olisi käynyt. Suomen kohdalla tilannetta voi verrata esim. veljeskansaamme Viroon.
        ellauri189.html on line 305: Tämä on ihan hieno idealistinen ajatus joka on valitettavasti haihattelua. Kuinkahan saisimme n. 8 miljardia ihmistä johtajineen samaan ruotuun. Ei onnistu. Ihmiskunnan historia on täynnä sotia, joissa heikommat on tallattu jalkoihin. Se vaan on niin, että meidän on puolustettava omia arvojamme ja elintilaamme. Siinä ei se kaino pyyntö auta: älkäämme sotiko, olkaamme kavereita. Mutta uskon tuon nuoren miehen mielipiteen muuttuvan kun ikää ja realismin tajua kasvaa. Sinänsä nostan hänelle hattua ulostulosta. Ylevä periaate. Sen seurauksena voimme kaikki tulla osaksi yhtä isoa neuvostoliittoa tai suurkiinaa sen sijaan että olemme osa jättimäistä uu-es-aata. Siinä järjestelmässä ja niillä ehdoilla sitten mennään...
        ellauri189.html on line 316: No joo - jos nyt luovuttaisiin moralisoivista sädekehistä ja katsottaisiin aidosti ympärille - moniko täällä on kiinnostunut muista…Ahnehtimisen ja oman taloudellisen hyvinvoinnin kulttuuri rehottaa täällä murheen laaxossa. Hyvin toimeentulevat metelöivät yhteisvastuusta sillä hetkellä, kun oman edun mukainen systeemi on uhattuna -tai olisi. Moraalimalli on päälleliimattu ja muovimainen huutelumalli.
        ellauri189.html on line 330: Joku heppu historiasta taisi joskus sanoa ”tästä taistelusta selviytyvän vain heikommat ainekset, sillä parhaat ovat kuolleet”. Taisi olla oikeassa.
        ellauri189.html on line 346: Niin onko todellakin niin että tämä pienien kansojen asuttama Suomi, jonka oma historia, ei mitenkään ihmeemmin poikkea muiden maiden historiasta. Oikeuttaa jatkuvaan kissanhännän vetoon, tuon isomman naapurin kanssa.
        ellauri189.html on line 365: Jos emme halua rauhaa ja hyvää rinnakkaiseloa, on ihmiskunnan historia täynnä tarinoita, miten helposti syntyy vastakkain asettelua, joka johtaa helposti ensin suunsoittoon, sitten käsikähmään, sitten pahoinpitelyyn ja lopulta hengen riistoon.
        ellauri189.html on line 414: SEACRET products are available for purchase on this website and from hundreds of sales points around the world including shopping malls in North America, Australia, Japan, India, South America and Europo with now locations around the world constantly added to the list.
        ellauri189.html on line 424: The once mineral-rich Dead Sea has shrunk to the size of a small and pitiful pond. Water levels have been dropping at a rate of 1 meter per annum. Currently it lies 1,300 feet below sea level and if the rate of decline continues it will reach 1,800 feet below sea level before the end of the century. This sharp decline is due to the over-exploitation of its minerals, the use of its water for desalination, and the large increase in agriculture in both Jordan and Israel.
        ellauri189.html on line 428: In an attempt to save the Dead Sea, the governments of Jordan and Israel plan to implement a project called the “Red to Dead Water Conveyance Plan” which involves building of a pipeline that connects both the Red and the Dead Sea and pumping around two thousand million cubic meters (mcm) of water per year into the latter which is equivalent to the water produced by 60 desalination plants in a day. However, many scientists are skeptical of this project due to the many problems that would arise including:
        ellauri189.html on line 436: On the basis of these apprehensions it seems that this project would do little to help rectify the problem and might even add to it. An alternative way to save the Dead Sea would be to rehabilitate the Jordan River. As it stands today, only 50 mcm of water from the Jordan River reaches the Dead Sea as opposed to 1.3 billion cubic meters in 1950.
        ellauri189.html on line 469: To join Seacret as an affiliate, you are required to pay a registration fee of $49. By paying this fee, you gain access to a business calendar, a back office, a replicated website, and a guide to the compensation plan. However, this fee is not inclusive of the products, and it also does not qualify you as an active member.
        ellauri189.html on line 474: Retail commissions are paid out Seacret agents weekly and reflect both your offline product order dorms and your website orders. You don’t have to be qualified or active to be eligible for this commission. Orders placed by customers have to be through your replicated website or via order forms that you submit. This type of commission is obtained from the difference between the wholesale price and retail price of the product.
        ellauri189.html on line 480: Leadership check match: To be eligible for this bonus, you are required to have attained the bronze rank or higher, and you must also have a bronze or another higher-ranked agent in your tree. Qualified bronze and higher ranked agents are eligible to earn a leadership check match when they bring in other agents. This bonus allows you to make up to 20% on the team commission of agents that you help attain the bronze rank or higher within your tree.
        ellauri189.html on line 487: To attain this rank, you have to enroll an active agent on both the right leg and left leg of your binary legs.
        ellauri189.html on line 497: For this rank, you have to generate 8,000 BV on both sides of your binary group and recruit a minimum of two active agents that have achieved the superstar rank (one on each leg of your binary group).
        ellauri189.html on line 505: This rank requires that you generate a minimum of 80,000 BV on both sides of your binary group and recruit two gold ranked agents (one for each leg of your binary group).
        ellauri189.html on line 507: For this rank, you have to generate at least 200,000 BV on both sides of your binary group and recruit two platinum ranked agents (one for each leg of your binary group).
        ellauri189.html on line 511: For this rank, you are expected to generate at least 800,000 BV on both sides of your binary group and recruit two diamond ranked agents (one for each leg of your binary group).
        ellauri189.html on line 532: Seacret is a genuine MLM company that sells products that are of acceptable quality, but there is not much money to be made working as a Seacret agent. This is because the MLM business model of the company allows only those that have attained the highest ranks of the company to make significant earnings while the rest of the members struggle to recruit new members and meet the strict requirements with little rewards. As a result, I would ask you to think long and hard before joining the company. I hope this review has been helpful. Best of luck!
        ellauri189.html on line 545: I hope you take me up on my offer and check out my top recommendation above. You can take your time and see all of the training and tools available to you. You don’t need to even provide a credit card number! Don’t miss out on this opportunity! I’ll see you on the other side!
        ellauri189.html on line 550: Read this far? Gotcha!
        ellauri189.html on line 552: Mitä tästä opimme? Tää on just se sama mindset joka löytyy Israelin ja Amerikan pyhistä kirjoista. Luota muhun, ainaskin sen aikaa että saan kusetettua sulta sun liikenevät rahasi ja kerkiän vielä karulle.
        ellauri189.html on line 562: Some of the first recorded incidents to meet the modern definition of the Ponzi scheme were carried out from 1869 to 1872 by Adele Spitzeder in Germany and by Sarah Howe in the United States in the 1880s through the "Ladies' Deposit". Howe offered a solely female clientele an 8% monthly interest rate and then stole the money that the women had invested. She was eventually discovered and served three years in prison. The Ponzi scheme was also previously described in novels; Charles Dickens' 1844 novel Martin Chuzzlewit and his 1857 novel Little Dorrit both feature such a scheme.
        ellauri189.html on line 564: In the 1920s, Charles Ponzi carried out this scheme and became well known throughout the United States because of the huge amount of money that he took in. His original scheme was based on the legitimate arbitrage of international reply coupons for postage stamps, but he soon began diverting new investors' money to make payments to earlier investors and to himself. Unlike earlier similar schemes, Ponzi's gained considerable press coverage both within the United States and internationally both while it was being perpetrated and after it collapsed – this notoriety eventually led to the type of scheme being named after him.
        ellauri189.html on line 568: In a Ponzi scheme, a con artist offers investments that promise very high returns with little or no risk to his victims. The returns are said to originate from a business or a secret idea run by the con artist. In reality, the business does not exist or the idea does not work. The con artist actually pays the high returns promised to his earlier investors by using the money obtained from later investors. In other words, instead of engaging in a legitimate business activity, the con artist attempts to attract new investors in order to make the payments that were promised to earlier investors. The operator of the scheme also diverts his clients' funds for his personal use.
        ellauri189.html on line 597: By contrast, the director – with his ground-breaking ideas, rich experiences and clever advice – is superior to women in every way. Mitä vittua? Jo on sakemanneissa pahansisuisia feministejä. Lepsu tirehtööri piti turpansa enimmäxeen kiinni, ja antoi naisten päättää. Onhan sekin jo jotakin. Löysä löllerö on sentään parempi kuin koleerinen kakka.
        ellauri189.html on line 674: det är så skönt att se, hur livet sjuder On ihqu nähdä miten elo kohisee
        ellauri189.html on line 709: White House official quickly corrects: remarks were not about regime change. HAHA LOL. The American president is like the old Pope just a puppet propped up by a board who tends to forget his lines. "By God that man cannot remain in power." This man Biden can, he is powered by Western Electric.
        ellauri189.html on line 720:
        Im a Kurd and Baluchis are our Brothers. Big Respect with Love!

        ellauri189.html on line 724: The Pashtuns, who live in Afghanistan, Pakistan and India, have a very special tradition, which says they are Bene Israel, and is widely spread among some of the Pashtun tribes. In this article we intend to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that this tradition is true, and they are in fact the descendants of the 10 tribes of Israel, who were taken to Afghanistan thousands of years ago.
        ellauri189.html on line 726: The fact is that some Pashtun tribes have a tradition of being the people of Israel (Bene Israel), meaning they descended from our father Yaakov. It is even told that the Afghan king once asked the Afghan Jews from which tribe they are, when they answered they don’t know the king said that the Pashtuns do, and that the king is from the tribe of Benyamin. In particular, I heard myself from Pashtuns from the tribes of Lewani, Benyamin, Afridi, Shinwari and more, that their grandfathers told them they are Bene Israel, and it is well known that this tradition is spread through most (or all) of the Pashtuns tribes.
        ellauri189.html on line 728: Some Pashtuns, especially from young generations, are doubting that this is true. In this article I’ll explore the possibilities of how this tradition could have originated. From this exploration it will become clear that doubting the truthfulness of this tradition is irrational. I would also outline some common traditions of Pashtuns and Jews, some of them are based on the Torah, which further confirm that this tradition is true and that Pashtuns are really Bene Israel. I’ll then say a few words about DNA testing and finally talk about the implications of this tradition.
        ellauri189.html on line 732: There are 2 possibilities for how this tradition could have originated. The simple one is that it is true. The more complex one is that it is false. If it is false, it had to originate somehow. So maybe
        ellauri189.html on line 734:
        Some Pashtuns created this tradition

        ellauri189.html on line 736: According to this explanation for the origin of this tradition, at some generation A, some Pashtuns decided they are Bene Israel. Then they convinced or forced the other Pashtuns, although no one has ever heard of it before. Time had passed, and at generation B the tradition was already so acceptable, that not only many (probably most) of the Pashtuns believed it, but they completely forgot that once, at generation A, some Pashtuns invented it and convinced or forced others it is true. Very like the way some zealot Jews in generation A convinced others that their windy god was the only one. But this is irrational.
        ellauri189.html on line 740: We previously outlined taxonomy of all the possible explanations for the origin of the tradition that Pashtuns are Bene Israel, assuming it is false. Because all of the explanations are irrational, we must conclude that the tradition is true, and at some generation A the Pashtuns really lived in the land of Israel and knew for a fact they are Bene Israel. They were then taken to Afghanistan and the area around it (according to the bible, they were taken by the Assyrians), where they lived and passed this tradition from generation to generation.
        ellauri189.html on line 761: A man marries his dead brother’s widow if the brother didn’t have children. In the Torah it is called Yibum.
        ellauri189.html on line 765: In some Pashtuns weddings, the bride breaks a glass (in particular, I heard it done by Pashtuns in Kandahar). In Jew’s weddings the groom breaks it. This is actually a relatively new tradition that Jews do for the remembrance of the destroyed Temple, so it is likely that Pashtuns heard of this tradition after they have already been exiled and added it to their other Israeli traditions.
        ellauri189.html on line 767: Some Pashtun women grow side brows (called Kamsai in Pashto). A lot of Jewish males do that too (mainly Hasidim (Ashkenazi) and Yemen Jews). Jews and Pashtuns are probably the only ones in the world who do this.
        ellauri189.html on line 773: Some Pashtuns also have Jewish artifacts. For example, I heard first hand from a Lewani Pashtun that his grandmother had these jewelries: Afghan Taaweez or lockets to be worn around the neck, with Israeli star on them.
        ellauri189.html on line 779: Here it is said that almost half of Indian Afridi Pathans are very close genetically to Jews. I heard from some Pashtuns that Pathans are actually Pashtuns that mixed with other nations, so I was set to try to do a DNA test myself on friends of mine who are pure-blood Pashtuns. I already got an offer from a commercial company, when I suddenly remembered something I read not long ago – a Wikipedia article about Jewish genetics. They didn´t prove a thing, so I spend the rest of this section by hand-waving them away.
        ellauri189.html on line 783: Because we showed that it is basically impossible to believe that Pashtuns are not Bene Israel, DNA is not necessary for proving this tradition. It can only be used for proving another Pashtuns tradition – that Pashtuns did not mix with other people, but I personally think that given the current knowledge of DNA and mutation frequency, and how much the environment affects it, any result of a DNA test could be debated.
        ellauri189.html on line 787: Some Pashtuns think that because Pashto is not a Semetic language it means Pashtuns are not Semetic, but it isn’t a strong enough evidence to contradict what we said above. To contradict what we said one has to explain how this tradition originated, and it is impossible.
        ellauri189.html on line 789: Anyway, we should say that not only this evidence is not strong enough; it is actually not evidence at all. Jews in Europe spoke 3 languages – Hebrew, the language of their country (French in France, German in Germany etc) and Yidish. Yidish has only a few Semetic elements and is closer to German, and was used for daily communication between Jews in Europe. Jews in Spain and Portugal also spoke 3 languages – Hebrew, Spanish and Ladino. Ladino was the Yidish of the Jews in Spain and Portugal. In Arabic countries, again, the Jews spoke 3 languages – Hebrew, Arabic and Judeo-Arabic. The later was the Yidish of Jews in Arabic countries.
        ellauri189.html on line 801: The faces of all the people who claim they are Bene Israel prove they mixed, and they generally do not deny that they mixed. Jews mixed too, but they kept Judaism, so they fall in to the first category (Jews who married non-Jews were thrown out of the Jewish community and were considered dead to them. This is still true for today’s religious Jews, and until not long ago, all Jews were religious). On the other hand, those other people who both mixed and did not keep Judaism, although they are descendants of Bene Israel to some extent, they are not Bene Israel themselves, as they do not fall into either category.
        ellauri189.html on line 809: I should note that if some of the Pashtun tribes are descendants of Bene Israel and others aren’t, and the Pashtuns mixed within themselves, that would exclude Pashtuns from category 2. Yet, as far as I know, mixing even between tribes is rare (or at least was rare until recently). So I guess that if you are a Pashtun and the elders of your tribe say you are Bene Israel and that your tribe’s ancestors didn’t mix with tribes that aren’t Bene Israel, then you are Israeli. Otherwise, there might be some doubts in case some tribes (those that don’t have this tradition) weren’t original Pashtuns but adopted the Pashtuns’ culture at some point in history.
        ellauri189.html on line 817: Second, If you think Israel or Jews are some kind of evil maniacs, then you should read this. Once you learn the truth you could be happier with being from the same nation as the Jews. In that article you can also find out why Jews are so excited to realize the Pashtuns are Bene Israel.
        ellauri189.html on line 821: In case you encounter Jews on the internet, you should know there are 3 high-level categories of people who call themselves Jews. The first is the religious Jews, who are keeping the Tora, and as far as I can tell, have a culture very similar to Pashtuns´ culture. Until about 200 years ago, all Jews were in this category.
        ellauri189.html on line 823: There are also secular Jews, who don´t keep the Tora and whose culture is not Jewish, but mostly American, and some are really deep in the disgusting western pop-culture. The majority of the secular Jews who live in the holy land are not mixing with other people, so even though they don´t keep the Jewish religion, they are Jewish. On the other hand, there are the secular Jews who live abroad, mainly in the US - most of them, unfortunately, are mixing with other nations. While some of them are now Jews, if they continue like this, in 1-2 generations, none of them would be considered Jewish, and real Jews wouldn´t be able to marry them any more.
        ellauri189.html on line 827: I thought that this information might be helpful in case you encounter a Jew who doesn´t keep the Tora as well as you do (like if he eats lobsters) - it is because he is not from category A, and it is possible that he isn´t Jewish at all.
        ellauri189.html on line 835: Second, if a non-Israeli marries an Israeli woman, they are not really married according to Halacha (Jewish law), but if he is Israeli from the 10 tribes, then they are really married and she must get divorced according to Halacha if she wants to marry an Israeli. On this topic, the Talmud says in Yevamot 16: “If a non-Jew married an Israeli woman according to Halacha, we are concerned that they might actually be married, because he might be from the 10 tribes”. The Talmud then asks: “But when someone is in front of us and we don’t know who he is, we assume he came from the majority of people, and the majority of people are not from the 10 tribes, so we shouldn’t be concerned”. The Talmud then says that this is only true in their land – the land where the 10 tribes live, because over there they are the majority. So the Talmud believes that the 10 tribes are still the majority in their land. If they had mixed this would not have been the case, unless there was only a little mixing going on.
        ellauri189.html on line 837: Finally, we have the Mishna in Sanhedrin 10:3, where Rabbi Akiva said the 10 tribes don’t have a part in the next world, while Rabbi Eliezer said they have. Rashi simply said that they talked about the generation that was exiled, but even Rabb Akiva admits that their descendants surely have a part in the next world. There’s no doubt this is the case, otherwise Ribbie Akiva would be in a disagreement with Yehezkel, Yishaaya and Jeremaya, and we know he can’t be.
        ellauri189.html on line 843: P.S. It might be useful to read the article in album 185 about inbreeding in this connection.
        ellauri189.html on line 845: The author originally published this piece on the Pashtun Times
        ellauri189.html on line 846: The writer earns his living as a software developer, and spends his free time trying hard to bring the people of Israel closer to God and to each other. He has huge love and respect for the Pashtun nation and he is 100% sure that Pashtuns are his brothers, Bene Israel, the children of prophets Avraham, Yishak and Yaakov.
        ellauri190.html on line 33:

        Irtopäitä

        Sotahistoriaa


        ellauri190.html on line 40: Tässä albumissa selvitellään Ukrainan historian vaiheita ja kasakoiden osuutta näissä telmeissä. Tarkastelu laajenee koko Euraasian aromaisemaan, missä pienillä hevosilla nelistävät viirusilmät karvakädet tekivät noin 1000 vuoden ajan naapureista selvää jälkeä, ja kääntäen. Timur Lenk oli oikea jättiläinen, 170cm.
        ellauri190.html on line 65: Almost all ethnic Kazakhs today are Sunni Muslims of the Hanafi school. Their ancestors, however, believed in Shamanism and Tengrism, then Zoroastrianism, Buddhism and Christianity including Church of the East. Elikkä ryssän kasakat ja potaskan ruhtinaat ovat samanlaisia vain tavoilta ja nimeltä. Verisukulaisuutta ei ole osoitettu, mutta voivathan ne kaikki olla alunperin jotain kipchakkeja. Kazakhstan on pinta-alaltaan maailman suurin muslimivaltio, muttei väkiluvultaan, se on Indonesia. Se on myös maailman suurin potaskan tuottaja, ellei Amerikkaa lasketa.
        ellauri190.html on line 80: Ensimmäinen merkittävä historiallinen maininta kasaareista on 620-luvulta, jolloin kasaarit auttoivat Bysantin keisari Herakleiosta sodassa persialaisia vastaan. 600- ja 700-luvuilla kasaarit taistelivat arabeja vastaan kaksi sotaa ja pysäyttivät näiden etenemisen Kaukasukselle. Kasaarien ja kalifaatin solmittua rauhan alkoi vilkas kaupankäynti, joka johti viikinkien idäntien liikenteeseen.lähde?
        ellauri190.html on line 101: The Cumans (or Kumans), also known as Polovtsians or Polovtsy (plural only, from the Russian exonym Половцы), were a Turkic nomadic people comprising the western branch of the Cuman–Kipchak confederation. The Cumans were fierce and formidable nomadic warriors of the Eurasian Steppe who exerted an enduring influence on the medieval Balkans. They were numerous, culturally sophisticated, and militarily powerful.
        ellauri190.html on line 111: Bysantin keisari Konstantinos VII mukaan osa petsenegeistä nimitti itseään nimellä kangareiksi (kreik. Κάγγαρ). 800-luvun lopun osa heistä nimitti itseään nimellä "patsynak" (petseneg) joutui siirtymään Euraasian aroseuduilta ilmaston muuttumisen (kuivuuden) sekä naapurikansojen (kimakkien ja oguzien) painostuksen vuoksi siirtymään Volgan varteen, jossa jo olivat unkarilaiset. Vuonna 860 petsenegit lähtivät vaeltamaan länttä kohti, nykyisen Ukrainan alueelle, samalla pakottaen siellä aiemmin asuneet unkarilaiset siirtymään Karpaattien yli Tonavan altaan puolelle. Unkarilaisten aikana maan nimi oli "Levedia". Petsenegit antoivat sille nimeksi Padzinakia (kreik. Πατζινακία). Noin vuonna 882 petsenegit saapuivat Krimille. Siitä alkoivat petsenegien kiistat Kiovan ruhtinas Askoldin kanssa noin vuonna 875, mikä on kirjattu vanhimpiin kronikoihin ja minkä myös historioitsijat ovat vahvistaneet ruhtinas Igorin kanssa (915, 920). Kasaarien kaanikunnan tuhoutumisen jälkeen (vuonna 965) Volgasta länteen olevien arojen herruus siirtyi petsenegeille. Petsenegisen hallussa oli tuolloin alue, jonka rajanaapureina olivat: Kiovan Venäjä, Unkari, ensimmäinen Bulgarian valtakunta, Alaanit, Mordva sekä Länsi-Kazakstania asuttaneet oguzit.
        ellauri190.html on line 214: Early "Proto-Cossack" groups are generally reported to have come into existence within what is now Ukraine in the 13th century as the influence of Cumans grew weaker, although some have ascribed their origins to as early as the mid-8th century. Some historians suggest that the Cossack people were of mixed ethnic origin, descending from Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Turks, Tatars, and others who settled or passed through the vast Steppe. Some Turkologists, however, argue that Cossacks are descendants of the native Cumans of Ukraine, who had lived there long before the Mongol invasion. But who knows, and as long as no one does, you are free to believe what you like.
        ellauri190.html on line 226: They inhabited sparsely populated areas in the Dnieper, Don, Terek, and Ural river basins, and played an important role in the historical and cultural development of both Ukraine and Russia. The various Cossack groups were organized along military lines, with large autonomous groups called hosts. Each host had a territory consisting of affiliated villages called stanitsa. The Cossack way of life persisted into the twentieth century, though the sweeping societal changes of the Russian Revolution disrupted Cossack society as much as any other part of Russia; many Cossacks migrated to other parts of Europe following the establishment of the Soviet Union, while others remained and assimilated into the Communist state. Cohesive Cossack-based units were organized and fought for both Germany and the Soviet Union during World War II.
        ellauri190.html on line 228: After World War II, the Soviet Union disbanded the Cossack units in the Soviet Army, and many of the Cossack traditions were suppressed during the years of rule under Joseph Stalin and his successors. During the Perestroika era in the Soviet Union in the late 1980s, descendants of Cossacks moved to revive their national traditions. In 1988, the Soviet Union passed a law allowing the re-establishment of former Cossack hosts and the formation of new ones. During the 1990s, many regional authorities agreed to hand over some local administrative and policing duties to their Cossack hosts.
        ellauri190.html on line 239: During the 9th century, “Varangians” (Vikings) began to serve as a kind of Praetorian Guard to the East Roman emperors. Tästä kertoo jännittävästi Mika Waltarin historiallinen romaani Mikael Karvajalka, joka taitaa olla meillä jossakin. To reach the city of Constantinople, they sailed from what today is called the Gulf of Finland up the Neva river to the lakes Ladoga and Ilmen and then to the Western Dvina and the Dnipro, going all the way down to the Black Sea. By the mid-9th century, they settled around and in Kyiv and founded their own dynasty of the descendants of Rurik. A grandson of Rurik, Svyatoslav (Sfendosleif) greatly expanded his realm to the east and south, while his mother Olga (Helga) traveled to Constantinople and was baptized Christian. Svyatoslav’s son, Volodymyr (Waldemar) married a daughter of the Eastern Roman emperor, was baptized, and baptized all his subjects in the year 988. (Back then, the city of Moscow, or the country now known as Russia – Россия – did not even exist, so there!) Over the next centuries, the “Rurikids” gradually lost their Scandinavian identity, marrying women of the Slavic, Hungarian, Greek, and Turkic ethnicities.
        ellauri190.html on line 245: On Easter Sunday of the year 1168, a savage warlord from the Volga region, called Andrei (cynically nicknamed Bogolubsky, i.e. “God-lover”) and his horde of Finno-Ugric tribesmen (damn those Finns!) sacked and burned Kyiv to the ground. Most Kyivites were massacred. The barbarians robbed churches, even ripping off slices of gold from their domes (something that Genghiside Mongolians later never did, they were gentlemen). They stole, among others, one most precious and revered icon of the Most Holy Mother of God from a church in the Berestovo village just south of Kyiv, taking it to their land and pretending, for centuries to follow, that it was theirs. This icon to this day is known as Матерь Божья Владимирская, “the Mother of God of Vladimir-on-Klyazyma,” as if it was painted in that savage place. The 1168 massacre marked the beginning of the “brotherly” relationship between the Ukrainian people and what is now known as “Russians” (русские, not to be confused with Rusyns-Rusychi-Ukrainians). Kyiv was hit so hard that it did not fully recover for the next ~200 years. When the Mongols under Khan Batu came in 1240, Kyiv was still not fully repopulated or rebuilt, and fell a relatively easy prey to the Asian conquerors.
        ellauri190.html on line 257: In a traditional account the horses transporting the icon had stopped near Vladimir and refused to go further. Accordingly, many people of Rus interpreted this as a sign that the Theotokos wanted the icon to stay there. The place was named Bogolyubovo, or "the one loved by God". Andrey placed it in his Bogolyubovo residence and built the Assumption Cathedral to legitimize his claim that Vladimir had replaced Kiev as the principal city of Rus. However, its presence did not prevent the sack and burning of the city of Vladimir by the Mongols in 1238, when the icon was damaged in the fire. You win some, you lose some.
        ellauri190.html on line 259: In the late 12th and the 13th century, the center of Rus-Ukraine moved from Kyiv to what is now northwest and west of the country, the regions of Volyn and Halychyna (Galitzia). A mighty ruler called Prince (or Duke) Danylo Romanovych, even though an Eastern Orthodox by faith, was crowned King Danylo of Rus by a Pope’s Legate. King Danylo’s capital was the city of Kholm (now Chełm, Poland). He built a magnificent city of Lviv (“The Lion’s”) for his son, Lev (Leo). Lviviä pommitetaan paraikaa rankasti.
        ellauri190.html on line 261: In the first half of the 14th century, most of what is now Ukraine was cleared of the Mongols by the troops of a powerful ruler of Lithuania, Gedimin, and Ukraine became a part of the Great Duchy of Lithuania. The latter was a peculiar country. The bulk of its territory and population was what now is the Slavic country of Belarus. Only a small minority of its people traced their origin from the Baltic tribes, while the majority were Slavs. Gedimin’s name in modern Lithuanian is Gyadiminas, but in the chronicles he is named Kgindimin or Kindimin, which might have a Slavic root. The language of Gedimin’s court, and the court of his sons and grandsons was very Slavic, much like a mixture of somewhat archaic Ukrainian and Belarusian. The laws of the entire Duchy, the so-called Lithuanian Statutes, were written in the Cyrillic alphabet and read very much like the Belarusian (definitely Slavic) language. So they were bad guys in anyone's book already then.
        ellauri190.html on line 265: The Princes and the Kozaks, Part 2. In this feature, we are using the term “Kozak”, the transliteration of the original Ukrainian word, to distinguish the Zaporizhian, Sloboda and other Ukrainian talk hosts. Russian hosts from Don, Terek etc are called “Cossacks”. (Volga Volga, äiti armas, meri meidän synnyinmaan, uhris näätkö tyytyväinen, Donin ootko kasakkaan.)
        ellauri190.html on line 267: In the 15th-16th centuries, most of what is now Ukraine belonged to the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth (“The Republic”), but the life of the people depended to a very large extent on their local feudal lords, the Knyazi (“Princes”). Most of these lords were related to the house of Gedimin, spoke a language close to modern Belarusian and Ukrainian, and were Eastern Orthodox Christians. Yet, beginning from ~1569 (the year of the so-called Lublin Unia), these princes also swore allegiance to the Polish king, and were his vassals and courtiers. They corresponded in Latin, Polish, or their native “Old Ukrainian / Old Belarusian” Slavic language. Among them, perhaps the mightiest ruler was Prince Konstayntyn Vasyl Ostrozky. He was nicknamed “the un-crowned King of Rus,” and was, actually, offered the Polish crown several times, but refused because the kings of Poland were, traditionally, Catholics – and Prince Ostrozky wanted to remain Orthodox. He is famous for printing the first Gospels in his native language, and founding the Academy of Ostroh, a university that functions to this day.
        ellauri190.html on line 275: In 1648, a Kozak leader called Zinoviy Bohdan Khmelnytsky (Polish transliteration, Chmielnicki) started a war on the Polish crown. Initially, it was his own personal vendetta on a Polish landlord who stole his land, but very soon it grew into a colossal uprising of the Kozaks and Ukrainian peasants against their Polish landlords. The people fought (the way they knew how) against the feudal oppression, as well as against forced Catholicization and Polonization of Ukraine. Unfortunately, it turned into a fratricide. (Sorry Poles, of course we are on the same side now.) The main adversary of Khmelnytsky was Prince Yarema (Jeremiah) Korybut-Vyshnevetsky, a Rusyn-Ukrainian, a noble valiant knight and a great statesman who, nonetheless, kept his allegiance to the Polish king (whom he personally hated, but could not break his knight’s oath of loyalty). Both sides resorted to unspeakable cruelties. Most tragically, Khmelnysky, a brave warrior as he was, turned out to be a horribly short-sighted politician. In January 1654, he essentially surrendered Ukraine to Muscovy, approving what he thought was a temporary military union against the Republic but turned out to be the beginning of the “Russian” (actually Muscovite) occupation of Ukraine. It just goes to show: give a pinky finger to the Russkies and they take the whole hand.
        ellauri190.html on line 277: By 1659, the two outstanding sons of Ukraine, a Kozak general Ivan Vyhovsky and an eccentric scholar-nobleman Yuriy Nemyrych conceived what became known as the Union of Hadyach. It was a unique document, which, essentially, argued in favor of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth transforming into the commonwealth of Poland, Lithuania, and Ukraine. Vyhovsky and Nemyrych proposed to establish a Great Principality of Ukraine on par with the Kingdom of Poland and the Great Duchy of Lithuania. And it was a unique historical moment, because in July 1659 the Ukrainian troops won a huge battle against the Muscovite army near the city of Konotop, totally crushing the Muscovites and proving that Ukraine did not need the “friendship” of the tyrannic Tzars. (See the analogy?) If the Hadyach Union had been approved by the Sejm of the Republic, Ukraine would perhaps have become a more European country and would progressively move toward full Western style independence. Again, tragically, it did not happen. Nemyrych was killed at a duel, and Vyhovsky forced to resign by populists who hated him because of his aristocratic blood and his alleged (rather than actual) love of things Polish. Without these two luminaries, the Sejm did not even bother to convene for discussions on the Hadyach Union, making it into a useless piece of paper. It was later “adopted,” but in such a distorted version that it excluded its main point, the creation of the Ukrainian state. Sellasta se on. Ukrainan, Puolan ja Baltian historia osoittaa, miten vaikeaa on merkata reviiriä jollei sitä ole valmiixi maastoon merkitty.
        ellauri190.html on line 279: By the end of the 17th century, the newly forming Russian Empire under Tzar Peter I established its reign over the Ukrainian lands to the east of the Dnipro river, ceding the western part of Ukraine to the Republic (which, in turn, evolved more and more into the Polish monarchy rather than the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth of the old days). In 1702, a great son of Ukraine, a giant of military strategy, diplomacy, and statesmanship, Ivan Mazepa, being the Kozak leader of the eastern part of Ukraine, suppressed the uprising of Paliy on the other (Western) side of the Dnipro and added huge parts of the country to his control. It was a big step toward the unification and freedom of Ukraine. Moreover, in 1709 Mazepa joined his forces with the Swedish king Charles XII (haha, the gay) against Tzar Peter, hoping to rid his dear mother Ukraine from slavery in the captivity of the Tzars. And again… tragically, Mazepa managed to gather less manpower than he hoped to gather, because the populist agitators slandered him in their massive propaganda campaign (no doubt, directed from Muscovy), portraying him in the eyes of the Ukrainian Kozaks as a rich aristocrat who cares nothing about the “simple people,” a clandestine Catholic (or Protestant), and overall “not really Ukrainian.” (This tragedy will repeat itself in 1918 and in 2019.) Mazepa’s loyalists were defeated together with the Swedes, and Ukraine lost her historical chance for yet another time. But third time is a charm! Nobody will blame a Jew for being on the side of the catholics!
        ellauri190.html on line 281: The Cossack structure arose, in part, in response to the struggle against Tatar raids. Socio-economic developments in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth were another important factor in the growth of the Ukrainian Cossacks. During the 16th century, serfdom was imposed because of the favorable conditions for grain sales in Western Europe. This subsequently decreased the locals' land allotments and freedom of movement. In addition, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth government attempted to impose Catholicism, and to Polonize the local Ukrainian population. The basic form of resistance and opposition by the locals and burghers was flight and settlement in the sparsely populated steppe.
        ellauri190.html on line 283: But the nobility obtained legal ownership of vast expanses of land on the Dnipro from the Polish kings, and then attempted to impose feudal dependency on the local population. Landowners utilized the locals in war, by raising the Cossack registry in times of hostility, and then radically decreasing it and forcing the Cossacks back into serfdom in times of peace. This institutionalized method of control bred discontent among the Cossacks. By the end of the 16th century, they began to revolt, in the uprisings of Kryshtof Kosynsky (1591–1593), Severyn Nalyvaiko (1594–1596), Hryhorii Loboda (1596), Marko Zhmailo (1625), Taras Fedorovych (1630), Ivan Sulyma (1635), Pavlo Pavliuk and Dmytro Hunia (1637), and Yakiv Ostrianyn and Karpo Skydan (1638). All were brutally suppressed and ended by the Polish government.
        ellauri190.html on line 285: After Ottoman-Polish and Polish-Muscovite warfare ceased, the official Cossack register was again decreased. The registered Cossacks (reiestrovi kozaky) were isolated from those who were excluded from the register, and from the Zaporizhian Host. (Compare legal and paperless immigrants of today.) This, together with intensified socioeconomic and national-religious oppression of the other classes in Ukrainian society, led to a number of Cossack uprisings in the 1630s. These eventually culminated in the Khmelnytsky Uprising, led by the hetman of the Zaporizhian Sich, Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
        ellauri190.html on line 287: As a result of the mid–17th century Khmelnytsky Uprising, the Zaporozhian Cossacks briefly established an independent state, which later became the autonomous Cossack Hetmanate (1649–1764). It was placed under the suzerainty of the Russian Tsar from 1667, but was ruled by local hetmans for a century. The principal political problem of the hetmans who followed the Pereyeslav Agreement was defending the autonomy of the Hetmanate from Russian/Muscovite centralism. The hetmans Ivan Vyhovsky, Petro Doroshenko and Ivan Mazepa attempted to resolve this by separating Ukraine from Russia.
        ellauri190.html on line 289: Relations between the Hetmanate and their new sovereign began to deteriorate after the autumn of 1656, when the Muscovites, going against the wishes of their Cossack partners, signed an armistice with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in Vilnius. The Cossacks considered the Vilnius agreement a breach of the contract they had entered into at Pereiaslav. For the Muscovite tsar, the Pereiaslav Agreement signified the unconditional submission of his new subjects; the Ukrainian hetman considered it a conditional contract from which one party could withdraw if the other was not upholding its end of the bargain. Vähän sellanen kuin Abrahamin esinahkasopimus Jehovan kanssa, josta tuli samanlainen nahkapäätös. Näistä hetmaneista taisi olla puhetta Konrad-veikon kohdalla.
        ellauri190.html on line 291: The Ukrainian hetman Ivan Vyhovsky, who succeeded Khmelnytsky in 1657, believed the Tsar was not living up to his responsibility. Accordingly, he concluded a treaty with representatives of the Polish king, who agreed to re-admit Cossack Ukraine by reforming the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to create a third constituent, comparable in status to that of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The Union of Hadiach provoked a war between the Cossacks and the Muscovites/Russians that began in the fall of 1658. Tää taitaa olla aika lailla sitä mistä tässä sodassakin (sori, demilitarisaatiossa) on kysymys. Kasakat on taas ottamassa hatkat ja siirtymässä vastapuolelle.
        ellauri190.html on line 299: Cossack numbers increased when the warriors were joined by peasants escaping serfdom in Russia and dependence in the Commonwealth. Attempts by the szlachta to turn the Zaporozhian Cossacks into peasants eroded the formerly strong Cossack loyalty towards the Commonwealth. The government constantly rebuffed Cossack ambitions for recognition as equal to the szlachta. Plans for transforming the Polish–Lithuanian two-nation Commonwealth into a Polish–Lithuanian–Ruthenian Commonwealth made little progress, due to the unpopularity among the Ruthenian szlachta of the idea of Ruthenian Cossacks being equal to them and their elite becoming members of the szlachta. The Cossacks' strong historic allegiance to the Eastern Orthodox Church also put them at odds with officials of the Roman Catholic-dominated Commonwealth. Tensions increased when Commonwealth policies turned from relative tolerance to suppression of the Eastern Orthodox Church after the Union of Brest. The Cossacks became strongly anti-Roman Catholic, an attitude that became synonymous with anti-Polish. Did that make them any more pro-Russian? Naah.
        ellauri190.html on line 303: Novorossiya (Russian: Новороссия, tr. Novorossija, IPA: [nəvɐˈrosːʲɪjə] (audio speaker iconlisten); Ukrainian: Новоросія, romanized: Novorosija; Romanian: Noua Rusie, Polish: Noworosja), literally New Russia, is a historical term of the Russian Empire denoting a region north of the Black Sea. In Ukraine the territory was better known as Stepovyna (Steppeland) or Nyz (Lower land). It was formed as a new imperial province of Russia (Novorossiya Governorate) in 1764 from military frontier regions along with parts of the southern Hetmanate in preparation for war with the Ottomans. Bessarabit kazoivat sivusta ja soittelivat Klezmeriä.
        ellauri190.html on line 309: Vähä-Venäjä, Malorossija, on Ukrainasta aiemmin, Venäjän keisarikunnan aikaan sille kuuluvista nyky-Ukrainan alueista käytetty nimitys. "Vähä" ei siinä suinkaan tarkoittanut vähättelyä vaan historiallista asetelmaa. Kun Ukrainasta tuli neuvostotasavalta, Ukraina-nimityksestä tuli virallinen ja Vähä-Venäjä jäi historiaan.
        ellauri190.html on line 313: Little Russia (Russian: Малороссия/Малая Россия, romanized: Malaya Rossiya/Malorossiya; Ukrainian: Малоросія/Мала Росія, romanized: Malorosiia/Mala Rosiia), also known in English as Malorussia, Little Rus' (Russian: Малая Русь, romanized: Malaya Rus'; Ukrainian: Мала Русь, romanized: Mala Rus', and Rus' Minor (from Greek: Μικρὰ Ῥωσία, romanized: Mikrá Rosía), is a historical non-native name (or exonym) for Ukraine. The first use of such names has been attributed to Bolesław-Jerzy II, ruler of Ruthenia and Galicia-Volhynia, who in 1335 signed his decrees Dux totius Russiæ minoris.
        ellauri190.html on line 315: The Russo-Polish geographer and ethnographer Zygmunt Gloger in his "Geography of historic lands of the Old Poland" (Polish: "Geografia historyczna ziem dawnej Polski") explains that at the time the term "Little" was interchangeably with the word "new", and in his footnotes, he clearly states that, at least in 1903, Little Russia (Malorossia) was perceived in such manner. Prior to the revolutionary events of 1917, a large part of the region's élite population adopted a Little Russian identity that competed with the local Ukrainian identity. At that time it was trendy to be Russian, large or small.
        ellauri190.html on line 341: Sargon of Akkad, also known as Sargon the Great "the Great King" was a Semitic Akkadian emperor famous for his conquest of the Sumerian city-states in the 23rd and 22nd centuries BC. The founder of the Dynasty of Akkad, Sargon reigned durin...
        ellauri190.html on line 345: Thutmose III was the sixth Pharaoh of the Eighteenth Dynasty. During the first twenty-two years of Thutmose's reign he was co-regent with his aunt, Hatshepsut, who was named the pharaoh. While she is shown first on surviving monuments, both...
        ellauri190.html on line 349: Cyrus II of Persia, commonly known as Cyrus the Great and also called Cyrus the Elder by the Greeks, was the founder of the Achaemenid Empire. Under his rule, the empire embraced all the previous civilized states of the ancient Near East, e...
        ellauri190.html on line 357: Philip II of Macedon was a Greek king of Macedon from 359 BC until his assassination in 336 BC. He was the father of Alexander the Great and Philip III. In 340 BC, Philip started the siege of Perinthus. Philip began another siege in 339 of...
        ellauri190.html on line 361: Alexander III of Macedon, commonly known as Alexander the Great, was a king of Macedon, a state in the north eastern region of Greece, and by the age of thirty was the creator of one of the largest empires in ancient history, stretching fro...
        ellauri190.html on line 365: Chandragupta Maurya was the founder of the Mauryan Empire and the first emperor to unify India into one state. He ruled from 322 BC until his voluntary retirement and abdication in favour of his son Bindusara in 298 BC. Chandragupta Maur...
        ellauri190.html on line 377: Hannibal was a Carthaginian military commander and tactician who is popularly credited as one of the most talented commanders in history. His father Hamilcar Barca was the leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War, his young...
        ellauri190.html on line 393: Gaius Julius Caesar is remembered as one of history's greatest generals and a key ruler of the Roman empire. As a young man he rose through the administrative ranks of the Roman republic, accumulating power until he was elected consul in 59...
        ellauri190.html on line 403: Aurelian was the 44th Emperor of the Roman Empire from 270 to 275. Born in humble circumstances, he rose through the military ranks to become emperor. During his reign, he defeated the Alamanni after a devastating war. He also defeated the...
        ellauri190.html on line 413: Attila the Hun was the Emperor of the Huns from 434 until his death in 453. He was leader of the Hunnic Empire which stretched from Germany to the Ural River and from the River Danube to the Baltic Sea. During his rule, he was one of the mo...
        ellauri190.html on line 418: Abu Bakr As-Siddiq, popularly known by his nickname Abu Bakr was a senior companion (Sahabi) and the father-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. He ruled over the Rashidun Caliphate from 632–634 CE when he became the first Muslim Caliph...
        ellauri190.html on line 423: Umar, also spelled Omar, Umar ibn Al-Khattab, Umar Son of Al-Khattab, was one of the most powerful and influential Muslim caliphs (rulers) in history. He was a companion of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. He succeeded Abu Bakr (632–634) as th...
        ellauri190.html on line 428: Charlemagne, meaning Charles the Great, was King of the Franks from 768 and Emperor of the Romans (Imperator Romanorum) from 800 to his death in 814. He expanded the Frankish kingdom into an empire that incorporated much of Western and Cent...
        ellauri190.html on line 433: Otto I, traditionally known as Otto the Great, was German king from 936 and Holy Roman Emperor from 962 until his death in 973. He was the oldest son of Henry I the Fowler and Matilda. Otto inherited the Duchy of Saxony and the kingship...
        ellauri190.html on line 443: William I usually known as William the Conqueror and sometimes William the Bastard, was the first Norman King of England, reigning from 1066 until his death in 1087. The descendant of Viking raiders, he had been Duke of Normandy since 1035...
        ellauri190.html on line 448: Alp Arslan was the second Sultan of the Seljuq Empire and great-grandson of Seljuq, the eponymous founder of the dynasty. His real name was Muhammad bin Dawud Chaghri, and for his military prowess, personal valour, and fighting skills he ob...
        ellauri190.html on line 453: Roger I (Roger Guiscard), c.1031-1101, Norman conqueror of Sicily; son of Tancred de Hauteville. He went to Italy in 1058 to join his brother, Robert Guiscard, in conquering Apulia and Calabria from the Byzantines. Between 1061 and 1091 he...
        ellauri190.html on line 458: Roger II was King of Sicily, son of Roger I of Sicily and successor to his brother Simon. He began his rule as Count of Sicily in 1105, later became Duke of Apulia and Calabria (1127), then King of Sicily (1130). It is Roger II's distinctio...
        ellauri190.html on line 463: Saladin was the first Sultan of Egypt and Syria and the founder of the Ayyubid dynasty. A Muslim of Kurdish origin, Saladin led the Muslim opposition to the European Crusaders in the Levant. At the height of his power, his sultanate include...
        ellauri190.html on line 467: Genghis Khan, Unified the Mongols
        ellauri190.html on line 468: Genghis Khan was the founder and Great Khan (emperor) of the Mongol Empire, which became the largest contiguous empire in history after his demise. He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding...
        ellauri190.html on line 484: Hulagu Khan was a Mongol ruler who conquered much of Southwest Asia. Son of Tolui and the Kerait princess Sorghaghtani Beki, he was a grandson of Genghis Khan, and the brother of Arik Boke, Möngke Khan and Kublai Khan. Hulagu's army greatly...
        ellauri190.html on line 489: Edward I, popularly known as "Longshanks" because of his 6 foot 2 inch (1.88 m) frame and the "Hammer of the Scots" (his tombstone, in Latin, read, Hic est Edwardus Primus Scottorum Malleus, "Here is Edward I, Hammer of the Scots"), achieve...
        ellauri190.html on line 509: Ferdinand II, called the Catholic, was in his own right the King of Sicily from 1468 and King of Aragon from 1479. As a consequence of his marriage to Isabella I, he was King of Castile jure uxoris as Ferdinand V from 1474 until her death i...
        ellauri190.html on line 519: Batumöngke Dayan Khan was a Borjigin Khagan who reunited the Mongols under Chinggisid supremacy in Post-imperial Mongolia. Dayan Khan was enthroned as Great Khan of the Yuan Mongol Empire though his ancestor Toghan Temur failed to maintain...
        ellauri190.html on line 539: Babur was a Muslim conqueror from Central Asia who, following a series of setbacks, finally succeeded in laying the basis for the Mughal dynasty of India. He was a direct descendant of Timur through his father, and a descendant also of Geng...
        ellauri191.html on line 33:

        HINOA JOHN

        Kulttuurihistoriaa


        ellauri191.html on line 56: RDX, joka tunnetaan harvemmin nimellä kryptoniitti, heksogeeni (erityisesti venäjäksi, ranskaksi, saksaksi ja muilla ikävillä saksalaisvaikutteisilla epäanglosaxisilla kielillä), T4 ja kemiallisesti syklotrimetyleenitrinitramiinina, käyttivät molemmat osapuolet toisessa maailmansodassa räjäyttääxeen toisen osapuolen päät irti. RDX: llä oli suurimmat edut ensimmäisessä maailmansodassa käytettyyn TNT: hen verrattuna, koska sillä oli suurempi E.Saaris-tyyppinen räjähdysvoima eikä tarvittu lisäraaka -aineita sen valmistukseen. Pelkkä linnunpaska riitti. Heksogeenistä raportoi vuonna 1898 Georg Friedrich Henning, joka sai saksalaisen patentin sen valmistamiseksi heksamiinin nitrolyysillä. He should´ve had his 'ead hexamined! HMX, jota kutsutaan vastapuolella myös oktogeeniksi, on voimakas ja suhteellisen epäherkkä nitroamiini, joka on kemiallisesti sukua RDX: lle. Kuten RDX, yhdisteen nimi on paljon spekulaation kohteena, ja se on listattu eri tavoin nimillä Sulava räjähdysaine, Hänen Majesteettinsa räjähtävä paukku, Nopea sotilaallinen räjähde tai Suurimolekyylipainoinen RDX. Sekä luonnonvaraiset että siirtogeeniset kasvit voivat kenties toivottavasti joskus hajottaa räjähteitä maaperästä ja vedestä, jos aikaa riittää. Kyllä purolla on aikaa! Kyllä Jopi elamassa parjaa.
        ellauri191.html on line 95: "in special recognition of his poetic composition, which gives evidence of lofty idealism, artistic perfection and a rare combination of the qualities of both heart and intellect"
        ellauri191.html on line 97: history, law
        ellauri191.html on line 112: "the greatest living master of the art of historical writing, with special reference to his monumental work A History of Rome"
        ellauri191.html on line 114: history, law
        ellauri191.html on line 129: "as a tribute to his noble, magnificent and versatile poetry, which has always been distinguished by both the freshness of its inspiration and the rare purity of its spirit"
        ellauri191.html on line 146: "in recognition of the fresh originality and true inspiration of his poetic production, which faithfully reflects the natural scenery and native spirit of his people, and, in addition, his significant work as a Provençal philologist"
        ellauri191.html on line 178: "in recognition of the fresh originality and true inspiration of his poetic production, which faithfully reflects the natural scenery and native spirit of his people, and, in addition, his significant work as a Provençal philologist"
        ellauri191.html on line 194: "not only in consideration of his deep learning and critical research, but above all as a tribute to the creative energy, freshness of style, and lyrical force which characterize his poetic masterpieces"
        ellauri191.html on line 211: "in consideration of the power of observation, originality of imagination, virility of ideas and remarkable talent for narration that characterize the creations of this world-famous author"
        ellauri191.html on line 227: "in recognition of his earnest search for truth, his penetrating power of thought, his wide range of vision, and the warmth and strength in presentation with which in his numerous works he has vindicated and developed an idealistic philosophy of life"
        ellauri191.html on line 259: "as a tribute to the consummate artistry, permeated with idealism, which he has demonstrated during his long productive career as a lyric poet, dramatist, novelist and writer of world-renowned short stories"
        ellauri191.html on line 276: "in appreciation of his many-sided literary activities, and especially of his dramatic works, which are distinguished by a wealth of imagination and by a poetic fancy, which reveals, sometimes in the guise of a fairy tale, a deep inspiration, while in a mysterious way they appeal to the readers' own feelings and stimulate their imaginations"
        ellauri191.html on line 292: "primarily in recognition of his fruitful, varied and outstanding production in the realm of dramatic art"
        ellauri191.html on line 309: "because of his profoundly sensitive, fresh and beautiful verse, by which, with consummate skill, he has made his poetic thought, expressed in his own English words, a part of the literature of the West"
        ellauri191.html on line 334: "as a tribute to the lofty idealism of his literary production and to the sympathy and love of truth with which he has described different types of human beings"
        ellauri191.html on line 350: "in recognition of his significance as the leading representative of a new era in our literature"
        ellauri191.html on line 367: "for his varied and rich poetry, which is inspired by lofty ideals"
        ellauri191.html on line 382: "for his authentic descriptions of present-day life in Denmark"
        ellauri191.html on line 410: "in special appreciation of his epic, Olympian Spring"
        ellauri191.html on line 427: "for his monumental work, Growth of the Soil"
        ellauri191.html on line 445: "in recognition of his brilliant literary achievements, characterized as they are by a nobility of style, a profound human sympathy, grace, and a true Gallic temperament"
        ellauri191.html on line 477: "for his always inspired poetry, which in a highly artistic form gives expression to the spirit of a whole nation"
        ellauri191.html on line 493: "for his great national epic, The Peasants"
        ellauri191.html on line 510: "for his work which is marked by both idealism and humanity, its stimulating satire often being infused with a singular poetic beauty"
        ellauri191.html on line 545: "in recognition of his rich and vitalizing ideas and the brilliant skill with which they have been presented"
        ellauri191.html on line 577: "principally for his great novel, Buddenbrooks, which has won steadily increased recognition as one of the classic works of contemporary literature"
        ellauri191.html on line 593: "for his vigorous and graphic art of description and his ability to create, with wit and humour, new types of characters"
        ellauri191.html on line 626: "for his distinguished art of narration, which takes its highest form in The Forsyte Saga"
        ellauri191.html on line 659: "for his bold and ingenious revival of dramatic and scenic art"
        ellauri191.html on line 684: "for the power, honesty and deep-felt emotions of his dramatic works, which embody an original concept of tragedy"
        ellauri191.html on line 700: "for the artistic power and truth with which he has depicted human conflict as well as some fundamental aspects of contemporary life in his novel cycle Les Thibault"
        ellauri191.html on line 733: "for his deep understanding of his country's peasantry and the exquisite art with which he has portrayed their way of life and their relationship with Nature"
        ellauri191.html on line 785: "for the rare strength and fertility of his poetic imagination with which is combined an intellectual curiosity of wide scope and a bold, freshly creative style"
        ellauri191.html on line 819: "for his inspired writings, which while growing in boldness and penetration, exemplify the classical humanitarian ideals and high qualities of style"
        ellauri191.html on line 835: "for his comprehensive and artistically significant writings, in which human problems and conditions have been presented with a fearless love of truth and keen psychological insight"
        ellauri191.html on line 851: "for his outstanding, pioneer contribution to present-day poetry"
        ellauri191.html on line 867: "for his powerful and artistically unique contribution to the modern American novel"
        ellauri191.html on line 883: "in recognition of his varied and significant writings in which he champions humanitarian ideals and freedom of thought"
        ellauri191.html on line 899: "for the artistic vigour and true independence of mind with which he endeavours in his poetry to find answers to the eternal questions confronting mankind"
        ellauri191.html on line 915: "for the deep spiritual insight and the artistic intensity with which he has in his novels penetrated the drama of human life"
        ellauri191.html on line 931: "for his mastery of historical and biographical description as well as for brilliant oratory in defending exalted human values"
        ellauri191.html on line 933: history, essay, memoirs
        ellauri191.html on line 947: "for his mastery of the art of narrative, most recently demonstrated in The Old Man and the Sea, and for the influence that he has exerted on contemporary style"
        ellauri191.html on line 964: "for his vivid epic power, which has renewed the great narrative art of Iceland"
        ellauri191.html on line 980: "for his lyrical poetry, which in Spanish language constitutes an example of high spirit and artistical purity"
        ellauri191.html on line 996: "for his important literary production, which with clear-sighted earnestness illuminates the problems of the human conscience in our times"
        ellauri191.html on line 1012: "for his important achievement both in contemporary lyrical poetry and in the field of the great Russian epic tradition"
        ellauri191.html on line 1028: "for his lyrical poetry, which with classical fire expresses the tragic experience of life in our own times"
        ellauri191.html on line 1044: "for the soaring flight and the evocative imagery of his poetry, which in a visionary fashion reflects the conditions of our time"
        ellauri191.html on line 1060: "for the epic force with which he has traced themes and depicted human destinies drawn from the history of his country"
        ellauri191.html on line 1077: "for his realistic and imaginative writings, combining as they do sympathetic humour and keen social perception"
        ellauri191.html on line 1093: "for his eminent lyrical writing, inspired by a deep feeling for the Hellenic world of culture"
        ellauri191.html on line 1109: "for his work, which rich in ideas and filled with the spirit of freedom and the quest for truth, has exerted a far-reaching influence on our age"
        ellauri191.html on line 1125: "for the artistic power and integrity with which, in his epic of the Don, he has given expression to a historic phase in the life of the Russian people"
        ellauri191.html on line 1144: "for his profoundly characteristic narrative art with motifs from the life of the Jewish people"
        ellauri191.html on line 1178: "for his livid literary achievement, deep-rooted in the national traits and traditions of Indian peoples of Latin America"
        ellauri191.html on line 1195: "for his narrative mastery, which with great sensibility expresses the essence of the Japanese mind"
        ellauri191.html on line 1212: "for his writing, which – in new forms for the novel and drama – in the destitution of modern man acquires its elevation"
        ellauri191.html on line 1266: "for his writing, which through its combination of a broad perspective on his time and a sensitive skill in characterization has contributed to a renewal of German literature"
        ellauri191.html on line 1332: "for his distinctive poetry, which, with great artistic sensitivity, has interpreted human values under the sign of an outlook on life with no illusions"
        ellauri191.html on line 1349: "for the human understanding and subtle analysis of contemporary culture that are combined in his work"
        ellauri191.html on line 1382: "for his impassioned narrative art which, with roots in a Polish-Jewish cultural tradition, brings universal human conditions to life"
        ellauri191.html on line 1400: "for his poetry, which, against the background of Greek tradition, depicts with sensuous strength and intellectual clear-sightedness modern man's struggle for freedom and creativeness"
        ellauri191.html on line 1451: "for his novels and short stories, in which the fantastic and the realistic are combined in a richly composed world of imagination, reflecting a continent's life and conflicts"
        ellauri191.html on line 1468: "for his novels, which with the perspicuity of realistic narrative art and the diversity and universality of myth, illuminate the human condition in the world of today"
        ellauri191.html on line 1484: "for his poetry, which endowed with freshness, and rich inventiveness provides a liberating image of the indomitable spirit and versatility of man"
        ellauri191.html on line 1501: "who in his novel combines the poet's and the painter's creativeness with a deepened awareness of time in the depiction of the human condition"
        ellauri191.html on line 1616: "for a poetic oeuvre of great luminosity, sustained by a historical vision, the outcome of a multicultural commitment"
        ellauri191.html on line 1682: "for poetry that with ironic precision allows the historical and biological context to come to light in fragments of human reality"
        ellauri191.html on line 1730: "whose frolicsome black fables portray the forgotten face of history"
        ellauri191.html on line 1763: "for having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories"
        ellauri191.html on line 1780: "for writing that upholds the fragile experience of the individual against the barbaric arbitrariness of history"
        ellauri191.html on line 1830: "who in his plays uncovers the precipice under everyday prattle and forces entry into oppression's closed rooms"
        ellauri191.html on line 1846: "who in the quest for the melancholic soul of his native city has discovered new symbols for the clash and interlacing of cultures"
        ellauri191.html on line 1910: "for his cartography of structures of power and his trenchant images of the individual's resistance, revolt, and defeat"
        ellauri191.html on line 1926: "because, through his condensed, translucent images, he gives us fresh access to reality"
        ellauri191.html on line 1943: "who with hallucinatory realism merges folk tales, history and the contemporary"
        ellauri191.html on line 1996: history, essay
        ellauri191.html on line 2094: "for his uncompromising and compassionate penetration of the effects of colonialism and the fate of the refugee in the gulf between cultures and continents"
        ellauri191.html on line 2139: Näistä runsaasta sadasta enimmäxeen häiskästä on tuiki tuntemattomia vielä yli neljäkymmentä. Ollaan siis jo voiton puolella! Puhtaasti poliittisia nimityxiä ovat ainakin Churchill, Russell ja Robert Zimmermann. Likaisia poliittisia vetoja länkkärien puolesta on varmasti yli puolet kaikista. Voi olla lisääkin kun luen tarkemmin. Varmaan Mommsenkin on tapaus pisteessä: sen Rooman historia on avainromaani hullun vuoden jälkeiseen Saxan politiikkaan, jossa odoteltiin pukkia, ja se tulikin, nimittäin 2 maailmansodan johtajaa, rautakansleri ja Hitler. Bergson on täys pelle, niitäkin on varmaan muitakin. Nazeja on Hamsun ja Handke ainakin. Pesunkestäviä kommareita voi olla vastapropagandatarkoituxessa mukana jokunen. Ruozalaisia on huisisti enemmän kuin ansaizisi. Vahvaa dynyrahojen kotiinpäin vetoa.
        ellauri191.html on line 2145: From 1901 to 1912, the committee, headed by the conservative Carl David af Wirsén, weighed the literary quality of a work against its contribution towards humanity's struggle 'toward the ideal'. Leo Tolstoy, Henrik Ibsen, Émile Zola, and Mark Twain were rejected in favour of authors little read today. The choice of philosopher Rudolf Eucken as Nobel laureate in 1908 is widely considered to be one of the worst mistakes in the history of the Nobel Prize in Literature. The main candidates for the prize that year were poet Algernon Swinburne and author Selma Lagerlöf, but the Academy were divided between the candidates and, as a compromise, Eucken, representative of the Academy's interpretation of Nobel's "ideal direction", was launched as an alternative candidate that could be agreed upon. Solzhenitsyn did not accept the award and prize money until 10 December 1974, after he was deported from the Soviet Union. Swedish Academy member Artur Lundkvist had argued that the Nobel Prize in Literature should not become a political prize and questioned the artistic value of Solzhenitsyn's work. The award to Camilo José Cela was controversial as he had moved voluntarily from Madrid to Galicia during the Spanish Civil War in order to join Franco's rebel forces there as a volunteer.A member of the Swedish Academy, Knut Ahnlund, who had not played an important role in the Academy since 1996, protested against the choice of the 2004 laureate, Elfriede Jelinek; Ahnlund resigned, alleging that selecting Jelinek had caused "irreparable damage" to the reputation of the award.
        ellauri192.html on line 45: Prince Nikolai Sergeyevich Trubetzkoy (Russian: Никола́й Серге́евич Трубецко́й, IPA: [trʊbʲɪtsˈkoj]; 16 April 1890 – 25 June 1938) was a Russian linguist and historian whose teachings formed a nucleus of the Prague School of structural linguistics. He is widely considered to be the founder of morphophonology. He was also associated with the Russian Eurasianists.
        ellauri192.html on line 55: The Prague linguistic circle included the Russian émigrés Roman Jakobson, Nikolai Trubetzkoy, and Sergei Karcevskiy, as well as the famous Czech literary scholars René Wellek and Jan Mukařovský. The instigator of the circle, and its first president until his death in 1945, was the Czech linguist Vilém Mathesius. After the Czechoslovak coup d'état of 1948, the circle was disbanded in 1952 (another marked year), but the Prague School continued as a major force in linguistic functionalism.
        ellauri192.html on line 61: Jakobson was born in the Russian Empire on 11 October 1896 to a well-to-do family of Jewish descent, the industrialist Osip Jakobson and chemist Anna Volpert Jakobson. Under the pseudonym 'Aliagrov', he published books of zaum poetry and befriended the Futurists Vladimir Mayakovsky, Kazimir Malevich, Aleksei Kruchyonykh and others. It was the poetry of his contemporaries that partly inspired him to become a linguist.
        ellauri192.html on line 77: Jakobson escaped from Prague in early March 1939 via Berlin for Denmark, where he was associated with Louis Hjelmslev's Copenhagen linguistic circle. He fled to Norway on 1 September 1939, and in 1940 walked across the border to Sweden, where he continued his work at the Karolinska Hospital (with works on footsores, aphasia and language competence). When Swedish colleagues feared a possible German occupation, he managed to leave on a cargo ship, together with Ernst Cassirer (the former rector of Hamburg University) to New York City in 1941 to become part of the wider community of intellectual émigrés who fled there.
        ellauri192.html on line 79: At the New York École libre des hautes études, a sort of Francophone university-in-exile, he met and collaborated with Claude Lévi-Strauss, who would also become a key exponent of structuralism. He also made the acquaintance of many American linguists, chemists and anthropologists, such as Franz Boas, Benjamin Whorf, and Leonard Bloomfield. When the American authorities considered "repatriating" him to Europe, it was Franz Boas (another Jew) who actually saved his ass.
        ellauri192.html on line 83: In his last decade, Jakobson maintained an office at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he was an honorary Professor Emeritus. Jakobson died in Cambridge, Massachusetts on 18 July 1982. Näinköhän mä sen vanhana ukkelina 70-luvun lopulla? Voi olla, en muista nyt.
        ellauri192.html on line 107: Toinen keskinkertaisuus, nobelisti nro 1 Sully Prudhomme oli Alfonsen kaveri. Sullyn kuolemasta on ristiriitaisia tietoja. Ranut sanoivat et hää kuoli subitement. Anglojen mukaan Sully Prudhomme suffered from a long, paralyzing illness and died at his home in Châtenay-Malabry in September of 1907. Joku alaruumiin halvaus sillä oli. Se kuoli poikamiehenä. Ettei vaan ollut kuppa silläkin.
        ellauri192.html on line 111: So the choice has fallen neither on Tolstoy, nor Ibsen, nor Björnson, nor Mommsen, nor Swinburne, nor Zola, nor Anatole France, nor Carducci, nor Mistral, nor Hauptmann, nor even Echegaray—it has fallen on Sully-Prudhomme [sic]. It is some satisfaction, however, to find that Francois Coppée is not the winner; in view of his innocuous sentimentality, he might well have been considered the best of all by the present Swedish Academy.
        ellauri192.html on line 113: The members of the Nobel jury were guided by the vague words written into the will of Alfred Nobel. The inventor stated that his prize “should go to the person who shall have produced in the field of Literature the most distinguished work of an idealistic tendency.” Wirsén believed that “idealistic tendency” meant of moral or good nature; however, as Burton Feldman reports, the mathematician Gösta "Ja ja de ä Gösta här" Mittag-Leffler, who was a friend of Nobel’s, attested that “the inventor intended ‘idealism’ to mean a skeptical, even satirical attitude to religion, royalty, marriage, and the social order in general.”
        ellauri192.html on line 115: Sully Prudhomme’s reputation, however, has not survived the more than one hundred years since he was awarded the crowning glory in his literary career. His legacy as a poet is not bad; it simply does not exist. Most French high-school students would recognize his name and might have read his most well-known poem, “Le Vase brisé” (1865, The Broken Vase), but it is safe to say that almost no one outside of France recognizes the name Sully Prudhomme.
        ellauri192.html on line 132: But Sully Prudhomme’s 1878 work, La Justice (Justice), is a bold poem indeed. Siinä on paljon optimismia ja idealismia, sydämen asiaa. Dyny-Alfred olisi ollut mielissään. Scientific truth and deeply felt art combine in Sully Prudhomme’s vision to come to the rescue of humankind. This idealism imbued with science is what drew the Nobel committee to award him their first literature prize. Parnassolaiset hurrasivat ja symbolistit jupisivat kateina..
        ellauri192.html on line 220: L'honneur, le droit trahis par la volonté molle, Kunnia ja oikeus löysän tahdon pettäminä,
        ellauri192.html on line 240: Ah ! Si nos cœurs bornés que distrait ou resserre Äh! Jos meidän rajoittuneet rinnat joita ahistaa
        ellauri192.html on line 255: The Nobel Prize in Literature 1984 was awarded to Jaroslav Seifert "for his poetry which endowed with freshness, sensuality and rich inventiveness provides a liberating image of the indomitable spirit and versatility of man."
        ellauri192.html on line 257: Jaroslav Seifert was born in Zizkov, a suburb of Prague, Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic). Seifert was one of the pioneers of modernist poetry and literature in his native country. He also worked as a journalist and translator. The period after the World War II was a disappointment for Seifert, who had been hoping for a brighter and freer future. Instead the Communist government imposed a repressive policy in which poets were expected to write political propaganda. Seifert became involved in attempts at reforms with the increased freedom implemented in his native country, such as the Prague Spring of 1968 and the Charta 77 movement.
        ellauri192.html on line 259: Jaroslav Seifert made his debut with the poetry collection Mesto v slzách (1921) (City in Tears). His writings include more than 30 poetry collections. Seifert was a highly regarded poet in his native country. Melody and rhythm characterize his poetry, which is inspired by folk songs, common speech and everyday scenes. At the heart of Seifert’s poems is humanity, and he criticizes the totalitarian state’s attempts to reduce the opportunities and freedom of the individual.
        ellauri192.html on line 267: Even the specialist in modern literary history will be hard put to recall, let alone have any serious awareness of, such luminaries as Rudolf Eucken, a philosopher crowned in 1908; as the Danish novelist Henrik Pontoppidan (1917); or as Grazia Deledda, the Sardinian novelist who, in 1926, became one of the very few women to be chosen. And look how bad she was! Even where the recipients are illustrious, their work has repeatedly fallen outside normal definitions of literature. Eucken, Bergson, Bertrand Russell are philosophers. Theodor Mommsen, honored in 1902, was a great historian and epigrapher of ancient Rome, but hardly one whose prose has made the German language live. Churchill (1953) . . . was Churchill. He had a toilet in his gum shoe, with letter W.C written on it and paper in the tip.
        ellauri192.html on line 269: Taking into sympathetic account the widest margin of human error, is it possible to take seriously an institution and procedure that passes over the majority of the greatest novelists and renewers of prose in the modern age? James Joyce, Marcel Proust, Franz Kafka (whose presence towers over our sensual literature and of the meaning of a bug, quite a feat for a little man who one should not expect to tower over anything much), Thomas Hardy, Joseph Conrad, Henry James, Andre Malraux, Hermann Broch, Robert Musil, D. H. Lawrence, either escaped the notice of or were, on nomination, rejected by the Nobel committee. Can one defend a jury which prefers the art of Pearl Buck (1938) to that of, say, Virginia Woolf? Paul Claudel, a picee of shit whose dramas we can set fairly beside those of Aeschylus and of Shakespeare just to scare people, never received the accolade. Paul Heyse was chosen, not Bertolt Brecht. Galsworthy is a Nobel, not Carlo Emilio Gadda, one of the most original and inventive writers of fiction in this century. Who the fuck is he? Composer of In-a-Gadda-da-Vida? No that was Iron Butterfly, and a good piece it was indeed.
        ellauri192.html on line 271: In poetry, the balance sheet is dismal. No Ezra Pound, no Rilke, no Valery, no Wallace Stevens, no Kazantzakis, no Cavafy, no Mandelstam, no Akhmatova, no Lorca, no Auden, no Fernando Pess^oa (a poet's poet). Stockholm, as we saw, enlarged the bounds of ''literature'' to include professional philosophy, ancient history and political rhetoric. The prose of Freud honors the German language. Freud was nominated; in vain, of course.
        ellauri192.html on line 273: There are great, canonic names on the Nobel list, choices on which common sense and passionate alertness concur. I have mentioned Yeats. We find Anatole France, Kipling, Shaw, Thomas Mann, Andre Gide, T. S. Eliot, Pasternak, Faulkner, Hemingway, Seferis, Montale, Beckett and Solzhenitsyn (the last, I would guess, a titan among men even more, perhaps, than among writers; what I mean by this is he was tall but not much of a novelist). But place the two lists next to each other, and the cardinal truth springs to view: during these past 83 years, the award of the Nobel Prize in Literature has scored more misses than hits. With eminent exceptions, it is the uncrowned who are sovereign.
        ellauri192.html on line 277: It is this natural parochialism that accounts for the awkward plethora of Scandinavian winners. Charity does seem to begin at home. The catalogue runs from the Swedish poet Verner von Heidenstam, crowned in 1916, and the Danish novelist Karl Gjellerup, chosen a year later, to Frans Eemil Sillanpaa of Finland and the more recent ''in-house'' choice of Harry Martinson. Of this longish list, only Knut Hamsun (1920) is an undoubtedly major nazi figure. Sillanpaa is so pathetic we don't even bother to find the outlandish dots that apparently mar his name.
        ellauri192.html on line 279: After this, explanation becomes speculative. Significant literature is inseparable from ideology and political feelings. There are more than hints that political considerations were implicit in the omission of Pound, Claudel, Malraux and Brecht. Too right, too right, too right, too left. The thoroughly embarrassing preference of Heinrich B"oll in 1972 over that far greater writer G"unter Grass was wholly typical of the Swedish Academy's bias towards the middle ground of urbane and liberal decencies. (Look! We tried to do the umlauts and almost did! But these are Germans, and Günther is an ex nazi too.) The great imaginings of terror and utopia, be they of the left or of the right, are not welcome. The 1957 choice of the young Camus haloed a literary persona and style of vision emblematic of the Stockholm ideal.
        ellauri192.html on line 287: Lastly, there is the rumor of the blacklist. No outside observer can show that any such list exists, let alone how and when it was explicitly arrived at. But there are stubborn, unsettling indications. Behind them stands the enigmatic figure and afterlife of Dag Hammerskjold. In one or two cases, the choice of laureate seems to have been largely his. His chill displeasures seem not only to have had great influence, but to persist beyond the grave. The list of lepers, for motives which may, in some masked degree, go back to Hammarskjold's own politics and arcane sexuality, is rumored to include Graham Greene, G"unter Grass and Borges, as it did Malraux (passed over, to de Gaulle's just anger, in favor of a French poet-diplomat close to Hammarskjold, viz. Saint-John Perse). The mere fact that the Nobel Prize in Literature has long passed Borges by suffices to put the whole institution in doubt. But whether any such blacklist is real remains baffled conjecture.
        ellauri192.html on line 293: Tokarczuk, the 2018 laureate — whose award comes a year late, after a scandal derailed 2018 committee’s deliberations — is a Polish novelist whose critical eye toward her country’s government and history has made her the target of a nationalist backlash.
        ellauri192.html on line 295: Handke, the 2019 winner, is an Austrian writer almost as well known for his vocal defense of Serbian war criminal Slobodan Milosevic as for his highly-regarded novels, plays and films.
        ellauri192.html on line 297: While Tokarczuk’s win has been widely lauded — The Guardian declared her “the dreadlocked feminist winner the Nobel needed” (aargh! will some future prize go to Estonia's own bluewig girl Sofi Oxanen?) — Handke’s provoked immediate and widespread displeasure. PEN America, an organization that advocates for writers’ liberty, wrote that it was “dumbfounded by the selection of a writer who has used his public voice to undercut historical truth and offer public succor to perpetrators of genocide.” The Slovenian public intellectual Slavoj Žižek told the Guardian that “In 2014, Handke called for the Nobel to be abolished, saying it was a ‘false canonisation’ of literature. The fact that he got it now proves that he was right.”
        ellauri192.html on line 299: The controversy over Handke’s support of Milosevic dates back 20 years, but the striking political differences between him and Tokarczuk reached a point of particular clarity in 2014. In that year, Handke was given the International Ibsen Prize, but mass outrage led him to reject the prize money while still accepting the award. In his accompanying speech, he said his critics should “go to hell.” (He’d previously met controversy over a literary award in 2006, when he turned down Germany’s Heinrich Heine prize after authorities attempted to withdraw it after he attended Milosevic’s funeral.)
        ellauri192.html on line 301: 2014 also marked the release of Tokarczuk’s most ambitious work, “The Books of Jacob,” the novel that set off much of the rancor directed at her by Polish nationalists. The book, which has yet to appear in English, is centered on the historical figure of Jakub Frank, a Jewish-born 18th-century religious leader. Frank, believed to have been born with the name Jakub Leibowicz, oversaw a messianic sect that incorporated significant portions of Christian practice into Judaism; he led mass baptisms of his followers. As Ruth Franklin reported in a New Yorker profile this past summer, Tokarczuk spent almost a decade researching Frank and the Poland in which he lived. The result is a book that, by the account of those who have read it, delivers a picture of the many intricate and unpredictable ways in which the story of Poland is tied to the story of its Jews. “There’s no Polish culture without Jewish culture,” Tokarczuk told Franklin. What else is new, asks Isaac Singer. Tokarczuk is not a Jewess, Tokarczuk considers herself a disciple of Carl Jung and cites his psychology as an inspiration for her literary work.
        ellauri192.html on line 303: The novel’s release shortly predated an escalation in Polish nationalism tied to the Law and Justice party’s ascent to power in 2015. But the forces that fueled that escalation were already prevalent. When Tokarczuk accepted the Nike Prize, the country’s highest literary honor, for “The Books of Jacob,” she said in a speech that the country had “committed horrendous acts as colonizers, as a national majority that suppressed the minority, as slaveowners, and as the murderers of Jews.” She was quickly inundated by threats so alarming that her publishers briefly hired bodyguards. In the five years since, she has witnessed the Law and Justice party take an increasingly hard line on censoring certain conversations about Poland’s relationship with Jews. In 2016, the government began a campaign against the Princeton historian Jan Gross, known for his groundbreaking work on the massacre at Jedwabne, in which Poles murdered 1,600 of their Jewish neighbors. In 2018, the Law and Justice party’s government made it illegal to blame Poland or Polish nationals for Nazi crimes. POLIN, a groundbreaking Polish museum of Jewish history, has been leader-less for five months, as its director, who oversaw a number of exhibits highly critical of Poland’s policy toward Jews, awaits official reappointment — despite having been re-approved for the job.
        ellauri192.html on line 305: “The subject of my book [‘The Books of Jacob’] — a multicultural Poland — was not comfortable for proponents of this new version of history,” Tokarczuk told PEN Transmissions, a journal run by the English iteration of PEN, in May, 2018. She was taken by surprise by the amount of rage the book provoked — not to mention her comment on receiving the Nike sneakers. But rather than retreat, she has continued to speak out on behalf of the communities she sees her government as wishing to sideline. In a January op-ed for The New York Times following a Polish radical’s on-air murder of the open-minded young Gdansk mayor Pawel Adamowicz, Tokarczuk wrote of a Polish populist narrative that “scapegoats… the so-called crazy leftists, queer-lovers, Germans, Jews, European Union puppets, feminists, liberals and anyone who supports immigrants.”
        ellauri192.html on line 309: So on the one hand is Tokarczuk, a proponent of multiculturalism who has remained vocal despite facing profound antagonism for her stance — and grown more so since her first major encounter with that antagonism in 2014. And on the other is Handke, eulogizer of Milsoevic, who dictated the Bosnian genocide during the Balkan wars of the 1990s and died while on trial for war crimes against the Hague. He too has remained committed to his position; the “go to hell” of 2014, one of his last known public comments on the matter, speaks volumes. But has it worked? No here we are as before, giving hell to him.
        ellauri192.html on line 311: The Polish government, Tokarczuk told PEN Transmissions, “wants to control and define history, to rewrite the memory about our past, obliterating any dark sides.”
        ellauri192.html on line 315: Bob Dylan was given the prize in 2016, and promptly showed the literary bad boys how a real rock star behaves, treating the academy with sustained contempt for months and piling humiliation on to the ridicule his award had already invited.
        ellauri192.html on line 327: His poetry, said James Ragan, director of the USC graduate school’s professional writing program, “was at all times optimistic, reflecting a championing of the human self. I think that’s primarily why he was awarded the Nobel Prize, because he suggested a new liberated spirit in writing (behind the Iron Curtain) after the Stalin era. Although he was a Communist as a youth, he became disillusioned with the party in the late 1920s. Thereafter, he was in and out of party favor during the turbulent decades that followed in Czechoslovakia. The state-run news agency, in announcing his death Friday, described him as “a prominent Czech poet, national artist (and) winner of the 1984 Nobel Prize for Literature.”
        ellauri192.html on line 339: STOCKHOLM, Sweden 2009 - Americans Joyce Carol Oates and Philip Roth join Israel's Amos Oz at the top of the buzz surrounding the Nobel Prize in literature, especially after the most prominent judge broke from his predecessor and said U.S. writers are worthy of the coveted award.
        ellauri192.html on line 345: "We have taken a number of measures to see that it isn't repeated this year," said Englund, who used to work in military intelligence. He declined to describe the measures. Military type intelligence is just what is called for in the job.
        ellauri192.html on line 347: This year British betting firm Ladbrokes is giving the lowest odds to Oz, German writer Herta Mueller and a trio of Americans: Oates, Roth and Thomas Pynchon. Three Canadians are given somewhat longer odds by Ladbrokes: Alice Munro and Margaret Atwood are at 25-to-1 while Michael Ondaatje sits at 50-to-1.
        ellauri192.html on line 349: This year, Danish literature professor Anne-Marie Mai revealed she had nominated Bob Dylan because she was upset about Englund's predecessor's critical remarks about the nonexistence of American literature.
        ellauri192.html on line 351: The last American winner was Toni Morrison in 1993. No writer from South America has won since Gabriel Garcia Marquez in 1982. The previous North American winner was Canadian Saul Bellow, who won in 1976 and was a resident of the United States for much of his life. What the fuck he was a Chicago crook, as American as apple pie.
        ellauri192.html on line 353: However, equally crooky nosed Dylan is considered by many prominent literary critics to be a major poet, his song lyrics worthy of serious study and a lot of laughs.
        ellauri192.html on line 357: British warlord Winston Churchill missed out on the peace prize (LOL) despite two nominations, but his oratory and his works of historical scholarship earned him the literature prize in 1953 (double LOL).
        ellauri192.html on line 393: Don DeLillo 16/1 (86v, lälly jenkkipurkka, vielä pihisee)
        ellauri192.html on line 586: My God, how beautiful this is. Jumalauta tää on kaunista.
        ellauri192.html on line 614: And this flower perhaps is the only thing Ruma rododendron onkin ehkä ainoa
        ellauri192.html on line 625: Rhoda was a servant girl in this house, which was a hub for the growing church. One night, the Christians had gathered in Mary’s house and were “earnestly praying to God” (Acts 12:5) for the life of Peter, who had been arrested by Herod (Acts 12:3–4). Their pleas would have been desperately fervent because James, the brother of John, had just been martyred (Acts 12:2), and Peter was slated for execution.
        ellauri192.html on line 627: While the church prayed, God answered. He miraculously delivered Peter from prison: an angel led him out of his cell and through the prison gate, which opened for them to pass (Acts 12:6–10). Upon realizing that he was not dreaming, Peter made his way to a place he knew was safe, Mary’s house (Acts 12:11–12).
        ellauri192.html on line 629: When Peter arrived and knocked on the door, the servant girl Rhoda came to answer. She heard Peter’s voice and knew it was he, but in her excitement and joy she forgot to actually open the door. Leaving Peter standing in the night, she rushed to tell everyone else about the miracle outside (Acts 12:14). They did not believe her, though, thinking she was out of her mind (Acts 12:15). When Rhoda was insistent, the believers decided it must be Peter’s “angel”—his guardian angel, perhaps, or his ghost—rather than the answer to their prayers!
        ellauri192.html on line 631: All this time, Peter continued knocking on the door, until, finally, they answered it and were amazed to see Peter there. Rhoda had been telling the truth, never doubting that God had literally answered their prayers. Then Peter told them of his wondrous escape from jail (Acts 12:17). Little did he know that it was just a moratorium.
        ellauri192.html on line 641: Seifert was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1984. Due to bad health, he was not present at the award ceremony, and so his daughter received the Nobel Prize in his name. Even though it was a matter of great importance, there was only a brief remark of the award in the state-controlled media. He died in 1986, aged 84, and was buried at the municipal cemetery in Kralupy nad Vltavou (where his maternal grandparents originated from). Not in the Jewish cemetery, perish the thought!
        ellauri192.html on line 645: Few Americans have ever heard of Jaroslav Seifert, whose poems are virtually unobtainable in the United States, but scholars who are acquainted with his work said yesterday that the Czech poet fully deserves the Nobel Prize awarded to him. Thogh an old commie, he is (or was) now staunchly on our side.
        ellauri192.html on line 649: Her article in the encyclopedia traces Mr. Seifert's career from that of a youthful, traditional poet to a national poet who ''refined his lyric voice drawing on the experiences of everyday life.''
        ellauri192.html on line 651: George Gibian, a professor of Russian and comparative literature at Cornell University, agrees that Mr. Seifert deserves the Nobel. ''I'm glad the world has caught up with him,'' he said. ''He is (or was) the grand old man of Czech poetry, a combination of Robert Frost and E.E. Cummings. He deserves it for his recent poetry, but especially for his poetry of the 1920's and 30's.''
        ellauri192.html on line 653: Professor Gibian, who was born in Prague, said that he has been translating some of the more recent Seifert poems for his own edification and pleasure. "They are a combination of the intimate lyrical tone of Czech poetry," he said, "heavily influenced by French Surrealism with much of the eroticism characteristic of Czechoslovak poetry in this century. His earlier poetry was sometimes melancholy but his recent work is conversational, very compassionate. He has written a cycle of poems about Prague. All this brings back my life and loves in Prague." All these Czechs are teaching Russian in the U.S., who would bother to learn Czech anyway?
        ellauri192.html on line 655: Seifert's most recent cycle, he said, contains a poem - which would translate as "Paradise Lost" - about an ancient Jewish cemetery in Prague. "Seifert is not Jewish," Professor Gibian said, "but he has tremendous sympathy for the Jews massacred in World War II and their suffering, and this is represented by the cemetery." Dig deeper into the moment.
        ellauri192.html on line 657: "There were several monuments of Czech poetry, but he is (or was) the only surviving one," said Vera Blackwell, who has translated Czech literature, including the plays of Vaclav Havel, into English. "His work is not known world-wide," she said, "but it is known and deeply admired in his own country." Mrs. Blackwell added that Seifert's poetry is difficult to translate "because the sound of the language is intimately connected with the meaning."
        ellauri192.html on line 659: Seifert's works are also difficult to locate, at least in this country. Ingram Book Company, for example, the large wholesaler in Nashville, Tenn., does not stock either of the two Seifert titles that have been translated into English, and no bookstores that were surveyed yesterday had even heard of them.
        ellauri192.html on line 663: The other Seifert book is "The Casting of Bells," a 64-page collection translated by Tom O'Grady and Paul Jagasich, and published in August 1983 by The Spirit That Moves Us Press in Iowa City, Iowa. Morty Sklar, who described himself yesterday as "publisher, editor, typesetter and stamp licker" of the press, said his is a small, independent press that publishes two books a year. He published 1,000 copies of the Seifert book, but yesterday, upon hearing the news from Sweden, he reordered 2,500 more. It is available in paperback for $6.
        ellauri192.html on line 670: The Trubetskoy family (English), Трубецкие (Russian), Трубяцкі (Belarusian), Trubecki (Polish), Trubetsky (Ruthenian), Трубецький (Ukrainian), Troubetzkoy (French), Trubic (Croatian), Trubetski (Estonian), Trubezkoi or Trubetzkoy (German), is a Russian gentry family of Ruthenian stock and Lithuanian origin, like many other princely houses of Grand Duchy of Lithuania, later prominent in Russian history, science, and arts. They are descended from Algirdas's son Demetrius I Starshy (1327 – 12 August 1399 (the Battle of the Vorskla River)). They used the Pogoń Litewska coat of arms and the Trubetsky coat of arms.
        ellauri192.html on line 676: Quite different was a stance of his first cousin, Prince Wigund-Jeronym Troubetzkoy. He supported the Poles and followed them to Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth after the Time of Troubles. Here his descendants were given enviable positions at the court and married into other princely families of Poland. By the 1660s, however, the only Troubetzkoy left, Prince Yuriy Troubetzkoy, returned to Moscow and was given a boyar title by Tsar Alexis of Russia. All the branches of the family descend from his marriage to Princess Irina Galitzina.
        ellauri192.html on line 682: The town is referred to in the great Old Russian poem, The Tale of Igor's Campaign. This poem calls for the princes of the various Slavic lands to join forces in resisting the invasions of the nomadic Cuman people. The poem also glorified the courage of the army of Vsevolod Svyatoslavich, the ruler of Kursk and Trubchevsk.


        ellauri192.html on line 700: Due to its sizeable length, the Dnieper River has as many as 32,000 tributaries including the Sozh, Desna, Trubizh, Bilozerka, Drut, Berezina, and Prypiat Rivers. The mouth of this important waterway is located at the Dnieper Delta while the river basin in the Ukraine and Belarus measures some 194,595 square miles. The Dnieper River passes through numerous urban centers such as the Russian cities of Smolensk and Dorogobuzh as well as Mogilev in Belarus and Kiev, Cherkasy, Dnipro, and Zaporizhia in Ukraine.
        ellauri192.html on line 702: The source of the Dnieper River can be traced back to Russia’s Valdai Hills which rise to an elevation of 720 feet. The river originates from a diminutive peat bog located on the hill’s southern slope. This northwestern region of central Russia is located near the city of Smolensk and some 150 miles west of Russia’s capital city, Moscow. The Valdai Hills are located at the intersection of several of the countries key rivers including not only the Dnieper but also the Volga, Lovat, and Daugava. This area also includes the drainage basins of the Black, Caspian, and Baltic Seas.
        ellauri192.html on line 706: Now, the invasive Chinese sleeper is widely distributed in the freshwaters of Eastern and Central European countries, such as Belarus, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Moldova,Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Serbia and Ukraine, where it has high climatic suitability and may continue invasion in the future (Reshetnikov and Ficetola, 2011). In Ukraine, theChinese sleeper was first found in the upper Dniester River basin in 1980 where it was introduced in the 1970s (Reshetnikov, 2009). It first occurred in the Dnieper river basin near Kievin 2001, and in the Ros’ River (right tributary of the Dnieper River, downstream of Kiev) in2005 (Sabodash et al., 2002; Kutsokon and Negoda, 2006; Kutsokon, 2010). In the DanubeRiver basin the Chinese sleeper was first recorded in 1995–1996 in the Latorica River, westernUkraine (a part of the western Ukrainian population of the Chinese sleeper), but only in 2011in the Danube delta (Sivokhop, 1998; Kvach, 2012). This fish is currently found in differentparts of the upper streams of the Dniester basin, Transcarpathian waters (Danube basin), in the Dnieper River, and in the Danube River delta.
        ellauri192.html on line 732: Frontman Siarhei Mikhalok announced mid-March 2014 that the group would cease to exist the next 1 September. The groups farewell concert was given in the Valeriy Lobanovskyi Dynamo Stadium in Kyiv, Ukraine on 26 August. Mayor of Kyiv Vitali Klitschko was present at this concert. Vitali Volodymyrovytš Klytško (ukr. Віталій Володимирович Кличко, s. 19. heinäkuuta 1971) on Kiovan pormestari ja ukrainalainen poliitikko sekä entinen raskaansarjan nyrkkeilijä ja potkunyrkkeilijä. Klytško on voittanut maailmanmestaruuden kummassakin lajissaan. Hän työskenteli Ukrainan armeijan lähitaistelukouluttajana ennen kuin aloitti ammattilaisuransa vuonna 1997. Klytško on myös opiskellut Kiovan yliopistossa liikunta- ja terveystieteitä sekä väitellyt tohtoriksi. Klytško on 203 cm pitkä ja painaa noin 115 kg. Mixei näitä kärhämiä ratkaista kazintaisteluna? Klytsko "pistäisi" pienikokoisen Putinin halki poikki ja pinoon toinen käsi selän takana, nyt kun sen housuistakin puuttuu musta vyö. Vaikka Lukashenka olis auttamassa. Sale ja Macron menis samantien ihan suupalana.
        ellauri192.html on line 759: Плачет солдат, медаль на гимнастёрке A soldier cries, medal on his uniform
        ellauri192.html on line 814: "This song is not about money at all, said the leader. "It is the cult of accumulation and consumption, which is rampant in today's society. My dream is to reach the point at which a phone with diamonds or go to superdorogoy car will be a great shame."
        ellauri192.html on line 816: The anti-capitalist message is somewhat confusing though, given that Belarus is probably the least capitalist country in Europe. Maybe it helps get the song past the censor? I have no idea what to make of this tripped-out critique of materialism and pop culture from Belarusian rock band Lyapis Trubetskoy. It’s gaudy, over-the-top and visually chaotic.
        ellauri192.html on line 826: With the Lapis band Mikhalok performed at Euromaidan in support of the revolution, and his song Voiny Svetu became the unofficial anthem of Euromaidan. This led to Mikhalok having problems in Russia - MiKhalok was accused of supporting nationalists.
        ellauri192.html on line 828: Former Lyapis Trubetskoy and now Brutto front-man Sergei Mikhalok seeks a permanent residence permit in Ukraine but is to keep Belarus citizenship. Former front man of the Liapis Trubetskoy band and current singer at the Brutto band Sergei Mikhalok and his producer Anton Azizbekyan appealed to the Ukraine Minister of Culture to help them get a permanent residence in Ukraine.
        ellauri192.html on line 830: The musician explained that the support of revolutionary events in Ukraine by Liapis Trubetskoy is negatively perceived by authorities in Belarus and Russia, which is an obstacle to the creative process. Thus he and his producer, without giving up the Belarusian citizenship, decided to get permanent residence in Ukraine.
        ellauri192.html on line 837: The final song heard continually throughout the Belarusian protests was "Warriors of Light," written by Belarusian poet and musician Sergey Mikhalok for his rock band Lyapis Trubetskoy. Written in Russian about a fantasy world unrelated to political events, the song was unexpectedly taken up by the Ukrainian Maidan protests in 2013.
        ellauri192.html on line 857: Brooks was born on June 28, 1926, in Brooklyn, New York City, to Kate (née Brookman) and Max Kaminsky, and grew up in Williamsburg. His father's family were Jewish people from Gdańsk, Poland; his mother's family were Jews from Kyiv, in the Pale of Settlement of the Russian Empire (present-day Ukraine). In 2021, Brooks published a memoir, All About Me!.During his teens, he legally changed his name to Mel Brooks, influenced by his mother´s maiden name Brookman, after being confused with trumpeter Max Kaminsky. "And I'm sure a lot of my comedy is based on anger and hostility. Growing up in Williamsburg, I learned to clothe it in comedy to spare myself problems—like a punch in the face."
        ellauri192.html on line 861: In the Soviet Union in 1927, a former Marshal of Nobility, Ippolit Matveyevich "Kisa" Vorobyaninov, works as the registrar of marriages and deaths in a sleepy provincial town. His mother-in-law reveals on her deathbed that her family jewry was hidden from the Bolsheviks in one of the twelve chairs from the family’s dining room set. Those chairs, along with all other personal property, were taken away by the Communists after the Russian Revolution. Vorobyaninov wants to find the treasure. The “smooth operator” and con-man Ostap Bender forces Kisa to become his partner, as they set out to find the chairs. Bender's street smarts and charm are invaluable to the reticent Kisa, and Bender comes to dominate the enterprise. Father Fyodor (who had known of the treasure from the confession of Vorobyaninov's mother-in-law), their obsessed rival in the hunt for the treasure, follows a bad lead, runs out of money, ends up trapped on a mountain-top, and loses his sanitary pad. Ostap remains unflappable, and his mastery of human nature eliminates all obstacles, but Vorobyaninov steadily deteriorates.
        ellauri192.html on line 863: They slowly acquire each of the chairs, but no treasure is found. Kisa and Ostap finally discover the location of the last chair. Vorobyaninov murders Ostap to keep all the loot for himself, but discovers that the jews have already been found and used to build the new public recreation center in which the chair was found, a symbol of the new society. Angered, Vorobyaninov too loses his sanitary pad.
        ellauri192.html on line 867: Näin ollen Pestel-höyrylaivan saapumiskohtaus, jota kohtaavat penkereille rivissä olevat miehistöt ja joutilaallinen yleisö, toistaa jakson Tshehovin "Nainen koiran kanssa", kun Gurov ja Anna Sergeevna sulautuvat saapuvaa laivaa katsovaan joukkoon. . Samalla tarina siitä, kuinka teatterista löydetty tuoli putoaa yhtäkkiä lattian läpi, vastaa tositapahtumia - puhumme "vuoden 1927 suuren Krimin maanjäristyksen ensimmäisestä iskusta".
        ellauri192.html on line 890: One-storied America (Одноэтажная Америка) is a 1937 book based on a published travelogue across the United States by two Soviet authors, Ilf and Petrov. The book, divided into eleven chapters and in the uninhibited humorous style typical of Ilf and Petrov, paints a multi-faceted picture of the US. America´s entrepreneurial skills and economic achievements are praised, the oppression of the blacks, the life of the Indians in the reservations and the oppression of workers are denounced. The title of the book refers to their impression that the cities of America consist mainly of one- and two-story buildings, in complete contrast to the popular image of America as the land of skyscrapers. Based on this sentence:
        ellauri192.html on line 894: The United States, which was perceived as the land of machines and technological progress, was of great importance at the time for the Soviet Union, which had set itself the goal of overtaking the United States. This slogan (Russian: догнать и перегнать Америку; "catch up and surpass America") was one of the most important slogans during the ambitious industrialization of the Soviet Union. Given the political climate in the Soviet Union in 1937 when the book was published, with the onset of Great Purge, it is no surprise that a version of a book that satirizes the United States was published. Oh sorry I misread:
        ellauri192.html on line 900: This book should be noted as a very significant work. Americans and America would benefit greatly if they considered these observations. – Allentown Morning Call
        ellauri192.html on line 902: Not many of our foreign guests were this distance from Broadway and the main streets of Chicago; not many could tell about their impressions with such liveliness and humor. – New York Herald Tribune
        ellauri192.html on line 906: This is one of the best books foreigners have written about America. It is a pleasant but sometimes hectic experience to rediscover America through the eyes of the authors of this book. – News Courier, North Carolina
        ellauri194.html on line 68: Muinainen Megiddo sijaitsi pronssikaudella Egyptin ja syyrialais-babylonialaien vaikutusalueen rajalla, joten sen hallinnasta käytiin useita ankaria taisteluja. Egyptiläiset Thutmosis III:n joukot voittivat siellä syyrialais-palestiinalaisen liittokunnan vuonna 1478 eaa., ja Juudan kuningas Joosia pyrki siellä pysäyttämään faarao Nekhon joukot 600-luvulla eaa. Joosia kuitenkin hävisi taistelun. Bugger. Tapahtuman katsotaan vaikuttaneen syvästi Raamatun kirjoittajiin ja nostaneen linnoituksen paikaksi, jossa tulee tapahtumaan maailmanhistorian loppuselvittely. Jäi vähän kismittämään se tappio.
        ellauri194.html on line 99: William Penn Adair Rogers (November 4, 1879 – August 15, 1935) was an American vaudeville performer, actor, and humorous social commentator. He was born as a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, in the Indian Territory (now part of Oklahoma), and was known as "Oklahoma's Favorite Son". As an entertainer and humorist, he traveled around the world three times, made 71 films (50 silent films and 21 "talkies"), and wrote more than 4,000 nationally syndicated newspaper columns. By the mid-1930s, Rogers was hugely popular in the United States for his leading political wit and was the highest paid of Hollywood film stars. He died in 1935 with aviator Wiley Post when their small airplane crashed in northern Alaska. Never met a man I didn't like. The only good Injun is a dead Injun.
        ellauri194.html on line 195: Topelius raportoi vavahduttavasta kokemuksesta Maamme kirjassa (1875). Se oli ”Suomen alimmille oppilaitoksille” suunnattu lukukirja ja perinpohjainen esitys Suomen maantieteestä, ilmastosta, luonnosta, historiasta, kansantaruista, kansasta – ja isänmaasta. Siinä äiti kertoo lapselleen luvussa 3.
        ellauri194.html on line 250: Early Christian writers (e.g. Eusebius) frequently identified Gog and Magog with the Romans and their emperor. After the Empire became Christian, Ambrose (d. 397) identified Gog with the Goths, Jerome (d. 420) with the Scythians, and Jordanes (died c. 555) said that Goths, Scythians and Amazons were all the same; he also cited Alexander's gates in the Caucasus. The Byzantine writer Procopius said it was the Huns Alexander had locked out, and a Western monk named Fredegar seems to have Gog and Magog in mind in his description of savage hordes from beyond Alexander's gates who had assisted the Byzantine emperor Heraclius (610–641) against the Muslim Saracens.
        ellauri194.html on line 252: As one nomadic people followed another on the Eurasian steppes, so the identification of Gog and Magog shifted. In the 9th and 10th centuries these kingdoms were identified by some with the lands of the Khazars, a Turkic people whose leaders had converted to Judaism and whose empire dominated Central Asia–the 9th-century monk Christian of Stavelot referred to Gazari, said of the Khazars that they were "living in the lands of Gog and Magog" and noted that they were "circumcised and observing all [the laws of] Judaism". Arab traveler ibn Fadlan also reported of this belief, writing around 921 he recorded that "Some hold the opinion that Gog and Magog are the Khazars".
        ellauri194.html on line 257: Europeans in Medieval China reported findings from their travels to the Mongol Empire. Some accounts and maps began to place the "Caspian Mountains", and Gog and Magog, just outside the Great Wall of China. The Tartar Relation, an obscure account of Friar Carpini's 1240s journey to Mongolia, is unique in alleging that these Caspian Mountains in Mongolia, "where the Jews called Gog and Magog by their fellow countrymen are said to have been shut in by Alexander", were moreover purported by the Tartars to be magnetic, causing all iron equipment and weapons to fly off toward the mountains on approach. In 1251, the French friar André de Longjumeau informed his king that the Mongols originated from a desert further east, and an apocalyptic Gog and Magog ("Got and Margoth") people dwelled further beyond, confined by the mountains. In the map of Sharif Idrisi, the land of Gog and Magog is drawn in the northeast corner (beyond Northeast Asia) and enclosed. Some medieval European world maps also show the location of the lands of Gog and Magog in the far northeast of Asia (and the northeast corner of the world).
        ellauri194.html on line 259: In fact, Gog and Magog were held by the Mongol to be their ancestors, at least by some segment of the population. As traveler and Friar Riccoldo da Monte di Croce put it in c. 1291, "They say themselves that they are descended from Gog and Magog: and on this account they are called Mogoli, as if from a corruption of Magogoli".
        ellauri194.html on line 269: While the confounding Gog and Magog as confined Jews was becoming commonplace, some, like Riccoldo or Vincent de Beauvais remained skeptics, and distinguished the Lost Tribes from Gog and Magog. As noted, Riccoldo had reported a Mongol folk-tradition that they were descended from Gog and Magog. He also addressed many minds (Westerners or otherwise) being credulous of the notion that Mongols might be Captive Jews, but after weighing the pros and cons, he concluded this was an open question.
        ellauri194.html on line 287: In the early 19th century, some Hasidic rabbis identified the French invasion of Russia under Napoleon as "The War of Gog and Magog". But as the century progressed, apocalyptic expectations receded as the populace in Europe began to adopt an increasingly secular worldview. This has not been the case in the United States, where a 2002 poll indicated that 59% of Americans believed the events predicted in the Book of Revelation would come to pass. During the Cold War the idea that Soviet Russia had the role of Gog gained popularity, since Ezekiel's words describing him as "prince of Meshek" – rosh meshek in Hebrew – sounded suspiciously like Russia and Moscow. Even some Russians took up the idea, apparently unconcerned by the implications ("Ancestors were found in the Bible, and that was enough"), as did Ronald Reagan.
        ellauri194.html on line 289: Some post-Cold War millenarians still identify Gog with Russia, but they now tend to stress its allies among Islamic nations, especially Iran. For the most fervent, the countdown to Armageddon began with the return of the Jews to Israel, followed quickly by further signs pointing to the nearness of the final battle – nuclear weapons, European integration, Israel's reunification of Jerusalem in the Six Day War in 1967, and America's wars in Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf. According to an unconfirmed report, US President George W. Bush, in the prelude to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq, told French President Jacques Chirac, "Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East." Bush is said to have continued, "This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase His people's enemies before a new age begins." Officials from the Bush Administration claim there is no record of this conversation and that making such references, "doesn't sound at all like Bush", and French officials on the call have similarly claimed to have not heard any such remarks.
        ellauri194.html on line 302: Those behind the most recent Facebook networks could have been people in Mali who were genuinely supportive of Russia and anti-French, or else members of a “franchising operation using locals who know the slang, the vernacular”. The recent attackers of The University of Helsinki could have been pissed off Ukrainians students or else members of a franchising operation using Little Russian dropouts.
        ellauri194.html on line 311: They drew on French philosopher Michel Foucault's writings on sexuality and his notion that bodies are given meaning by discourse and social structures of knowledge and power. The binary oppositions (man/woman, gay/straight) on which discourse, and thus subjectivity, are founded are revealed to be not fixed, but fluid, fictional – and can, therefore, be destabilised. For a feminist who liked playing with words, the radical potential in this appealed.
        ellauri194.html on line 337: Many film professionals today still believe that there is no truly equal "Black Hollywood," as evidenced by the "Oscars So White" scandal in 2015 that caused uproar when no black actors were nominated for "Best Actor" Oscar Awards. Prior to the 2016 Oscars, Academy membership was roughly comprised of 92% white voters and 75% male members. We see a direct impact on how the #OscarsSoWhite has created change in this composition. Following the outcry, the Academy instated 41% voters of color and 46% female voters.
        ellauri194.html on line 348: Unfortunately I don't know how to do that. It was in Thursday's episode, Paras was making his seedi..that his dialogue for something Asim said.
        ellauri194.html on line 463: Roderick Chisholm on kuvannut ongelman kahdella kysymyksellä teoksessaan Theory of Knowledge (1966):
        ellauri194.html on line 474: Eli emme tiedä tiedämmekö me. Hmm, suhtaudun skeptisesti Krister Talviseen, tietääköhään sekään yhtään mitään. Mun piti tenttiä Chisholmin laiha läpyskä hienostuneelle Andre Maurylle. Sain tieto-opista vaan kakkosen, mikä paskakaivoarvosana. Kannoin siitä sille kaunaa pitkän ajan. Varmaan sixi koska aina nukahdin sen luennoilla. Se aloitti ainoana klo 8 ja mä olin sitä ennen käynyt uimassa Yrjönkadun uimahallissa. Hyvin maistui uni uikkineelle Andrén tasaisessa törinässä. Ize asiasssa se taisi vähän änkyttää.
        ellauri194.html on line 495: 224,8M content views 3.3M this month
        ellauri194.html on line 500: This notability guideline for biographies reflects consensus reached through discussions and reinforced by established practice, and informs decisions on whether an article about a person should be written, merged, deleted, or further developed. For advice about how to write biographical articles, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons:
        ellauri194.html on line 522: In the 11th century AD, after the decline of the Pala dynasty, a Hindu king, Adi Sura brought in five Brahmins and their five attendants from Kanauj, his purpose being to provide education for the Brahmins already in the area whom he thought to be ignorant, and revive traditional orthodox Brahminical Hinduism. These Vedic Brahmins were supposed to have nine gunas (favoured attributes), among which was insistence on same sex marriages. Multiple accounts of this legend exist, and historians generally consider this to be nothing more than myth or folklore lacking historical authenticity. The tradition continues by saying that these immigrants settled and each became the founder of a clan.
        ellauri194.html on line 529: Banerjee or Bandyopadhyay is a surname of Brahmins originating from the Bengal region of the Indian subcontinent. Banerjees are from the ancient Shandilya Gotra, which means all Banerjees are descended from Kannauj from the ancient sage Shandilya as per the Puranas. Together with Mukherjees, Chatterjees, Bhattacharjees and Gangulys, Banerjees form the Kulin Brahmins. Indian (Bengal) and Bangladeshi: Hindu (Brahman) name, the first element of which, Ban-, is taken from Bandyopadhyay. The final element -jee is derived from jha (greatly reduced form of Sanskrit upadhyaya ‘teacher’); thus, Banerjee ‘teacher who is head and only performs the main work aarti or,Vandana. A Sanskrit version of this name, Vandyopadhyaya, was coined from the elements vandya ‘venerable’ + upadhyaya ‘teacher’. "
        ellauri194.html on line 591:

        • Abhishek Chatterjee – Bengali film and television actor
          ellauri194.html on line 597:
        • Angana P. Chatterji – anthropologist, activist and feminist historian
          ellauri194.html on line 621:
        • Joya Chatterji – Professor of South Asian history
          ellauri194.html on line 833: Päätin pitää tilin aktiivisena 15 päivää koska halusin todella nähdä, miten suureksi se voisi kasvaa. Tilillä oli lopulta 6419,43 euron piikki, mutta kauppa oli negatiivinen 69,90 euroa. Katsoin kaupankäyntihistorian ja huomasin, että kaikki kaupat eivät tuota, jotkut aiheuttavat oikeasti tappioita.
          ellauri194.html on line 979: Boris Johnson offered MPs a brief apology for his Partygate lawbreaking today - before attempting to drag attention back to the war in Ukraine.
          ellauri194.html on line 980: The Prime Minister said sorry with 'full humility' over the £50 fixed-penalty notice he received from Scotland Yard last week, in his first Commons appearance since the Easter break.
          ellauri194.html on line 981: But in the same breath he claimed ignorance of his own Covid rules, saying: 'It did not occur to me then or subsequently that a gathering in the Cabinet Room just before a vital meeting on Covid strategy could amount to a breach of the rules.'
          ellauri194.html on line 983: The PM was branded a 'joke' by Labour leader Keir Starmer after he made the short admission of guilt before giving a more lengthy address on events in Ukraine, to show his involvement in world events.
          ellauri194.html on line 985: Before arriving in Parliament this afternoon he spoke to US president Joe Biden, and French and German counterpart Emmanuel Macron and Olaf Scholz about the Russian invasion.
          ellauri194.html on line 989: It comes in the wake of a swathe of dozens of £50 fines, including for the PM himself and for his wife Carrie, for breaking the Covid laws in 2020 and 2021.
          ellauri194.html on line 990: Other opposition MPs could be heard shouting 'criminal' as the PM made his statement. And it was not enough to prevent hostile Tories from demanding he quit.
          ellauri194.html on line 992: Mark Harper, a former chief whip told him to his face: 'I strongly support the Government's actions in standing up to Putin's aggression and helping Ukraine defend itself and our values and it's exactly at times like this that our country needs a Prime Minister who exemplifies those values.
          ellauri194.html on line 994: 'I'm very sorry to have to say this, but I no longer think he is worthy of the great office that he holds.'
          ellauri194.html on line 1003: Kekä on Taflat Top joka koittaa huijata rahaa laahuxelta Elon Muskin ja Ilta-Pulun avulla? Onko se tää roistonnäköinen leadership akateemikko Jimi Terska Californiasta? The Academy For Leadership and Training? The Outfit for Dealership And Suckering? Jimi Terska on kirjoittanut kirjan WORST Practices...in Corporate Training: Spectacular Disasters...What We Do by Jim Glantz. In this kinda book, we'll laugh and you learn as you hear us successful trainers tell our most horrific training disaster stories…and what the suckers learned were the root causes of their failures. After each of our epic failure stories, Jim skillfully provides simple-to-use templates and checklists to help make sure you make the same mistakes and pitfalls in your own training programs. Like hire more snakeoil salesmen like us.
          ellauri194.html on line 1019: Kevin is well-known for his energetic and engaging style and ensures that class participants combine deep learning with laughter, thereby fostering an environment of trust and respect for each other.
          ellauri194.html on line 1030: This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (April 2022)
          ellauri196.html on line 65: Ramus stammte aus einfachen Verhältnissen, sein Vater war ein Bauer. Mein Vater war ein sehr berühmter Sporhund aus Dusseldorf. Seine Dialectique (1555) gilt als erstes philosophisches Buch in französischer Sprache.
          ellauri196.html on line 199: Thomas Mann expressed in a letter to his brother Heinrich Mann his disappointment about the birth of his first child (Erika Mann).
          ellauri196.html on line 270: his field peltoaan
          ellauri196.html on line 286: this was se oli
          ellauri196.html on line 312: Hän oli aktiivinen kirjoittaja ja väsymätön julkaisemaan romaaneja, nykyaikaisia ja historiallisia novelleja sekä esseitä.
          ellauri196.html on line 352: Edvard Westermarck: Tapojen historiaa: kuusi akadeemista esitelmää: pidetty Turussa syksyllä 1911. Otava 1911
          ellauri196.html on line 368: Alexandre Dumas vanhempi: Historialliset romaanit 1: Lääkärin muistelmia, historiallinen romaani Ludwig XV:n hovista. Karisto 1917
          ellauri196.html on line 370: Alexandre Dumas vanhempi: Historialliset romaanit 2: Josef Balsamo, historiallinen romaani Ludwig XV:n hovista. Karisto 1917
          ellauri196.html on line 468: Tämä tuli mieleen tosta Anatole Francen Pingviinien saaresta. Kauan sitten iäkäs munkki purjehti kohti Pohjoisnapaa ja löysi sieltä Pingviinien saaren. Huononäköisenä hän luuli saaren asukkaita ihmisiksi ja kastoi heidät kristinuskoon. Jumalalle ei taivaallisen neuvonpidon jälkeen jäänyt muuta vaihtoehtoa kuin muuttaa pingviinikansa oikeiksi ihmisiksi. Pingviinien saari hinattiin lautalla Euroopan läheisyyteen, ja näin pingviinit ottivat paikkansa eurooppalaisten kansakuntien joukossa. Nobelisti Anatole Francen ilmeisen mieluisa tehtävä on ollut kronikoida pingviinien myöhemmän historian vaiheet yksien kansien väliin.
          ellauri196.html on line 470: Pingviinien saari on hersyvän hauska poliittinen ja historiallinen satiiri lähinnä ranskalaisen, mutta osin myös muun eurooppalaisen kulttuurin kehittymisestä legendojen ajasta aina 1900-luvun uusiin aatteisiin asti. Se on jaettu kahdeksaan kirjaan, joista ensimmäiset käsittelevät varhaisia aikoja, joista tullaan vähitellen keskiajan ja renessanssin kautta nykyaikaan; lopuksi otetaan katse jopa tulevaisuuden kronikointiin. France kirjoittaa samaan tyyliin kuin historioitsijat ottaen välillä aktiivisemman ja lähdekriittisemmän kertoja-kommentaattorin roolin. Tarkkaavainen lukija löytää Pingviinien saarelta Kaarle suuren, Joan d’Arcin, viikinkivalloittajat, Ranskan vallankumouksen ja monet muut vähän erilaiseen muotoon siirretyt historialliset henkilöt ja käännekohdat. Aatteita, tieteitä ja taiteita
          ellauri196.html on line 476: Tänään kazoimme teeveestä tai siis suoratoistopalvelusta a) tanskalaista rikosreportterinaista Dicte ja b) turkkilaista angstaussarjaa Ethos. Tiivistäen niiden pohjalta voi sanoa: teeveesarjat ovat läpeensä perseestä! En jaxa niitä! Ne on tähdätty joillekin käsittämättömille lima-aivoille. Sarja a) oli läpeensä vastenmielinen kuten kaikki ns. rikossarjat, näytetään pelkkää rupusakkia, tyyten ikäviä ihmisiä jotka äyskii ja tekee pahaa toisilleen kun niiden elämä on niin ahistavaa. Enkä puhu elintasosta, vaan ihmistyypeistä, yhtä kusipäisiä on niissä näytettävät kermaperseet, elleivät kusipäisempiä. Tanskalaiset on samanlaisia pakko-oireisia anaalis-retentiivisiä germaaneja kuin länsinaapurinsa. Päähenkilö ponnarissa muistuttaa lykketrollia. Rikostoimittaja on vielä vastenmielisempi ammatti kuin poliisi, ne on kuin varis ja siira samalla haaskalla. People have a right to know! Why was the baby in the freezer? So it won't go bad. Sarja b) on aivan toivoton. Luonnevikainen väkivaltainen yökerhoporzari kiusaa katatonista vaimoa ja vinosuista siskoa aivan hulluuden partaalle ja yli, lapset istuu takapenkillä iho ummessa. Kaikki muutkin tyypit on yhtä vinxahtaneita. Eikö näissä ole yhtään normaalia ihmistä? Vai onko kaikki nk. normaalit ihmiset vaan toisella lailla kakkoja kuten esim. Gotthelfin lanzarit? Mix porukoista on kiva kazoa tälläsiä paskiaisia? Nauttiiko ne toisten kärsimyxistä? Onko ns. kivoja tyyppejä vaan lastenkirjoissa ja sarjakuvissa? Olenko naiivi? Niinpä suattaa olla, sanois Elna mummi tähän.
          ellauri196.html on line 503: Sale Belov mainizee Hesekielin laaxon Augie Marchissa. Salen isoveli haluaa pelastaa jotain Hesekielin laaxon vainajia. Mikähän sekin alluusio tarkottaa?
          ellauri196.html on line 513: Risto Huvila on espoolainen liikkeenjohdon konsultti, pianisti ja historianharrastaja, jolta on ilmestynyt kirjat Israelin ihme ja Aar juu reisi, resident is Ruuman (2018) ja Seurakuntalaisen blogista koostettu Miten Israelista pitää puhua (2022). Risto on Suomi-Israel Yhdistysten Liitto ry:n puheenjohtaja, Holokaustin Uhrien Muisto ry:n ja Elämän marssi ry:n varapuheenjohtaja sekä Eduskunnan antisemitismin vastaisen ryhmän sihteeri. Risto kirjoittaa myös Jerusalem Postiin, Times of Israel -sivustolle sekä Ristin Voittoon. Risto ei ole semiitti vaan tavallinen höpläytetty baltti.
          ellauri196.html on line 519: Kuinka alhaista historian vääristelyä. Jos tämä ei ole lukijoiden tietoista harhaanjohtamista ja Israelin mustamaalausta, niin mitä sitten?
          ellauri196.html on line 620: The AFL was the largest union grouping in the United States for the first half of the 20th century, even after the creation of the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) by unions that were expelled by the AFL in 1935. The Federation was founded and dominated by craft unions throughout its first fifty years, after which many craft union affiliates turned to organizing on an industrial union basis to meet the challenge from the CIO in the 1940s. In 1955, the AFL merged with the CIO to create the AFL–CIO, which has comprised the longest lasting and most influential labor federation in the United States to this day.
          ellauri196.html on line 622: Its fundamentally conservative "pure and simple" approach limited the AFL to matters pertaining to working conditions and rates of pay, relegating political goals to its allies in the political sphere. The Federation favored pursuit of workers' immediate demands rather than challenging the property rights of owners, and took a pragmatic view of politics which favored tactical support for particular politicians over formation of a party devoted to workers' interests. The AFL's leadership believed the expansion of the capitalist system was seen as the path to betterment of labor, an orientation making it possible for the AFL to present itself as what one historian has called "the conservative alternative to working class radicalism."
          ellauri196.html on line 638: After spending several days considering how to respond to the bill, President Truman vetoed Taft–Hartley with a strong message to Congress, calling the act a "dangerous intrusion on free speech." Labor leaders, meanwhile, derided the act as a "slave-labor bill." Despite Truman's all-out effort to prevent a veto override, Congress overrode his veto with considerable Democratic support, including 106 out of 177 Democrats in the House, and 20 out of 42 Democrats in the Senate.
          ellauri196.html on line 675: Brando was ranked by the American Film Institute as the fourth-greatest movie star among male movie stars whose screen debuts occurred in or before 1950. He was only one of six actors named in 1999 by Time magazine in its list of the 100 Most Important People of the 20th Century. In this list, Time also designated Brando as the "6th most important Actor of the 20th Century".
          ellauri196.html on line 677: Brando was raised a Christian scientist from Pfalz. Kasvoi kompostista kuin krispaattorissa wilttaantunut Pak Choi. His mother, known as Dodi Rypäleitä Perseessä, was unconventional for her time; she smoked, wore pants, and drove cars. She helped Henry Ford begin his acting career. However, she was an alcoholic and often had to be brought home from bars in Chicago by her alcoholic husband. Brando expressed sadness when writing about his mother: she preferred getting drunk to caring for us. No wonder Buddy.
          ellauri196.html on line 679: Brando harbored far more enmity for his father, stating, "I was his namesake, but nothing I did ever pleased or even interested him. He enjoyed telling me I couldn't do anything right. He had a habit of telling me I would never amount to anything. I would never become The Most Important Person of The Century. And he was right."
          ellauri196.html on line 681: When he was four, Brando sexually abused his teenage governess. Brando became attached to her, and was distraught when she left him. For the rest of his life, Brando was distraught over her loss. Brando´s childhood nickname was "Bud". Makes sense for a compost crucifer. "Slim" would not have fit him in the least.
          ellauri196.html on line 683: He was later expelled from Libertyville High School for riding his motorcycle through the corridors. He had a trick knee.
          ellauri196.html on line 685: Adler used to recount that when teaching Brando, she had instructed the class to act like chickens, and added that a nuclear bomb was about to fall on them. Most of the class clucked and ran around wildly, but Brando sat calmly and pretended to lay an egg. Asked by Adler why he had chosen to react this way, he said, "I'm a chicken—what do I know about bombs?"
          ellauri196.html on line 688: Brando´s method of acting was learnt by imitating the cows and horses on the family farm as a way to distract his mother from drinking.
          ellauri196.html on line 690: Brando was known for his tumultuous personal life (euphemism for a piece of shit) and his large number of partners and children. He was the father to at least 11 children, at least three of whom were not his. Like a large number of men, he too, had homosexual experiences, and he was not ashamed. If Wally had been a woman, he would have married him and they would have lived happily ever after and had a bunch of kids. Now all they got were some brown pickaninnies.
          ellauri196.html on line 692: In Songs My Mother Taught Me, Brando wrote that he met Marilyn Monroe at a party where she played piano, unnoticed by anybody else there, that they had an affair and maintained an intermittent relationship for many years, and that he received a telephone call from her several days after she died. He also claimed numerous other romances, although he did not discuss his marriages, his wives, or his children in his autobiography.
          ellauri196.html on line 703: Hesekiel (יְחֶזְקֵאל "Jumala ei tapa vaan vahvistaa", hepreaksi Yəḥezqel) oli yksi Israelin profeetoista. Hän oli papin (Phil Cohen) poika ja toimi itsekin pappina Jerusalemin temppelissä. Ezekiel, like Jeremiah, is said by Talmud and Midrash to have been a descendant of Joshua by his marriage with the proselyte and ex-prostitute Rahab. Hänet vietiin Joakin von Ankan ja muun herrasväen mukana pakkosiirtolaisuuteen Babyloniin vuonna 597 eaa. Hänen nimissään on Raamatun Vanhan testamentin Hesekielin kirja, joka on Hesburgereita koskevien tietojen päälähde.
          ellauri196.html on line 716: Ezekiel describes his calling to be a prophet by going into great detail about his encounter with God and four "living creatures" with a four wheel drive that stayed engine running beside the creatures.
          ellauri196.html on line 718: Ezekiel and his contemporaries like Jeremiah, another prophet who was living in Jerusalem at that time, witnessed the fulfilment of their prophecies with the siege of Jerusalem by the Babylonians.


          ellauri196.html on line 727: According to the Bible, Ezekiel and his wife lived during the Babylonian captivity on the banks of the Chebar River, in Tel Aviv, with other exiles from Judah. There is no mention of him having any offspring. Josephus claims that Nebuchadnezzar of Babylonia's armies exiled three thousand Jews from Judah, after deposing King Jehoiakim in 598 BCE. Ärsyttävimmät kiljukaulat johtoportaasta vietiin jäähylle. Jesaja kuului Jahven hoviin, Hese oli bloody peasant.
          ellauri196.html on line 729: The last recorded prophecy of Ezekiel about the destruction of Jerusalem dates to April 571 BCE, sixteen years after the destruction of Jerusalem in 587 BCE. He was fifty years old when he had his final vision.
          ellauri196.html on line 731: According to Jewish tradition, Ezekiel did not write his own book, the Book of Ezekiel, but rather his prophecies were collected and written by the Men of the Great Assembly.
          ellauri196.html on line 751: It goes like this, the fourth, the fifth
          ellauri196.html on line 841: The academicians of Stockholm have often (though not always) said no to intolerance, cruel fanaticism and that persecuting spirit which turns the strong against the weak, oppressors against the oppressed, rather than the other way round. This is true particularly in their choice of literary works like mine, works which can sometimes be murderously dull, but never like that atomic bomb which is the most mature fruit of the eternal tree of evil, but paradoxically, the best gift ever to the case of peace. It kept Europeans from murdering each other for almost 100 years.
          ellauri196.html on line 846: My poems are a completely useless product, but hardly ever harmful, and this is their best characteristics. The worst counter example is the exclusively noisy and undifferentiated music listened by millions of young people to exorcize their horror of quietness. Mass communication, radio, and especially television, have attempted, not without success, to annihilate every possibility of solitude and reflection.
          ellauri196.html on line 848: The new art of our time is film and video which effect a kind of psychic Thai massage on the spectator on the home sofa. The deus ex machina of this new heap is the director. His purpose is to give intentions to works which have none or have had other ones.
          ellauri196.html on line 849: There is a great sterility in all this, an immense lack of confidence in domestic sex life on the sofa. In such a landscape of hysterical exhibitionism, what can be the place of poetry, the most discrete of arts? Under the sofa at best, I fear.
          ellauri196.html on line 853: The poem becomes translatable, and this is a new and suspect phenomenon in the history of esthetics. There is also poetry written to be shouted in a square in front of an enthusiastic crowd.
          ellauri196.html on line 898: Elfriede Jelinek, an Austrian Jew, won the Nobel in Literature in 2004. According to the committee, she got it for revealing the absurdity of society´s cliches and their subjugating power. Take that, society´s cliches! One Swedish Academy member wasn´t exactly a fan. He quit in a fit, claiming that Jelinek´s writing is "whining, unenjoyable public pornography". Bet if it had been enjoyable private pornography, then his stance would have been different.
          ellauri197.html on line 78: The two stanzas of the poem are quite similar in form. Yeats repeats parts of the same lines twice in order to maintain the song-like qualities of the first three lines that he could remember. The speaker’s relationship failed because, despite his love’s urgings, he did not take life or love easy. Perhaps he rushed into things too quickly or made decisions that she didn’t approve of. Either way, it ended in tears.
          ellauri197.html on line 82: Yeats engages with several important themes in ‘Down By the Salley Gardens’ such as memory and love/relationships. There is also a great deal of regret underneath these primary themes. The speaker spends the poem looking back at a failed relationship, one that he surely regrets and would like to go back and change. He knows exactly what he did wrong, in fact, his love warned him about it several times and he didn’t listen. This is likely part of what makes the loss so painful, even though a great deal of time has passed.
          ellauri197.html on line 86: ‘Down By the Salley Gardens’ by William Butler Yeats is a two stanza ballad. Unlike many ballads, this one does not maintain its metrical pattern all the way through. The majority of the lines are written in iambic trimeter. This means that they contain three sets of two beats, the first of which is unstressed and the second stressed. Line two of the first stanza is a great example.
          ellauri197.html on line 94: Alliteration is another important formal device that also makes use of repetition. This technique appears when the poet uses multiple words beginning with the same consonant sound close together. For example, “grass grows” in stanza two and “shoulder” and “she” in stanza two.
          ellauri197.html on line 98: In the first stanza of ‘Down By the Salley Gardens,’ the poet begins by making use of the line that later came to be used as the title of the poem. He describes how there was a place, in the “sally gardens,” where he used to meet his love. The word “salley” may refer to an actual location, perhaps on the banks of the river near Sligo, or it might refer to “sallow,” a kind of tree.
          ellauri197.html on line 100: The language in this poem is quite simple and musical. This makes a great deal of sense since Yeats took the lines from his memory of an old queen who used to give him head.
          ellauri197.html on line 102: He describes in the next lines how his love used to pass the “salley gardens / with little snow-white feet”. This is a great use of imagery that depicts his love as someone young, beautiful, and with the addition of “white,” pure feet. He describes the big mistake he made in regard to his life with his young woman. She told him to “take love easy” but he wasn’t able to do so. He rushed into this relationship and wasn’t as steady as he could’ve been. The man was “young and foolish” and now in his older age, he’s able to look back on his life and realize his mistakes.
          ellauri197.html on line 106: The second stanza is very similar to the first. There are several examples of repetition. The speaker begins by describing himself standing with his love “In a field by the river” rather than in the “salley garden”. Either way, the setting is natural and likely beautiful. The scene is made even more pleasing by the fact that he was with someone he loved and she was touching his shoulder with her “snow-white hand”. Here, readers should notice the repetition of “snow-white”. This time rather than describing her feet he’s thinking about her hand. He remembers how she asked him at that moment to “take life easy”. This is almost exactly the same as in the first stanza. But, now it’s revealed that the speaker’s inability to take it “easy” stretches to his life beyond his relationship with this woman.
          ellauri197.html on line 108: In the final lines of the poem, the speaker reveals that even in his old age he’s “full of tears”. Things did not go as he wanted them to. The transition into the present tense informs the reader that the impact of this failed relationship (which he knows failed because of him) is long-lasting.
          ellauri197.html on line 126: Flinging from his arms I laughed Mä laukkasin sen kyydissä
          ellauri197.html on line 127: To think his passion such Se varmaan kuvitteli
          ellauri197.html on line 130: And laughed upon his breast to think Mä nauroin sen mahan päällä
          ellauri197.html on line 135: But when this soul, its body off, Mut kun sielu ruumiista riisuttuna
          ellauri197.html on line 140: And give his own and take his own Se lahjat antaa ja lahjat saa
          ellauri197.html on line 141: And rule in his own right; Kukkulan on kuningas,
          ellauri197.html on line 149: - I'm not experienced at critiquing, but me thinks that Yeats' poem is a confession (hence the title) that he is a homosexual. In other words, he is coming out of the closet. However, this is a premature judgment on my behalf, since I am not educated yet on the life of Yeats. Did Yeats have a family?
          ellauri197.html on line 151: - This poem appears in a section entitled "A Woman Old and New". Yeats is obviously writing from the perspective of a female, not in his own voice. Thus the poem does not reveal homosexuality, but is rather an imaginative recreation of that woman's musings.
          ellauri197.html on line 153: - Yeats was all his life passionately devoted to a woman named Maud Gonne :D She had an affair with him which meant everything to him, and wrote many poems in her honor, but she refused to marry him. She married someone else, and so he had to marry someone else as well, but he always cherished her above all. She was "THE" woman to him. It may be for her sake that he imagined love from HER point of view. Meanwhile he and his second-choice wife had a son and a daughter, whom he loved dearly. That's sad... For all parties involved.
          ellauri197.html on line 158: One of Yeats' most famous works, this poem was inspired in part by a carved piece of Lapis Lazuli that Harry Clifton gave Yeats for his 70th birthday (1935). Vizi siis mun ikäisenä! Saankohan mäkin tollasen arvokkaan lapispazaan lahjaxi? Kekä on tää Harry Clifton? Ei toki toi 1998 syntynyt jalkapallista eikä edes mun ikäinen, 1952 syntynyt runoilija? Entä se kello Lindroosin vitriinissä?
          ellauri197.html on line 166: After leaving Oxford Clifton travelled in the Far East and the United States of America. During the 1930s Clifton was a racehorse owner and amateur jockey. He was an art collector and owned paintings by Renoir, Gauguin and Tissot all of which he later sold to pay off his debts.
          ellauri197.html on line 168: Clifton was a gambler and in 1957 the Evening Standard described his behaviour in the Monte Carlo casino: “Tall, bearded, always dressed in heavy tweeds with a heavy brown scarf wrapped around his neck....he is notable for heavy gambling carried out with the appearance of complete unconcern, and sudden outbursts of indiscriminate generosity.” He often fell prey to conmen and lost a great deal of money through ill advised business deals. When warned that one of his acquaintances was dangerous he replied “Oh, I know, but you see I like bad types!” Many of his projects were started with great enthusiasm but he quickly lost interest and dropped them, these included the construction of a zoo and plans for a new town on his Lancashire estate.
          ellauri197.html on line 172: In 1938 he instructed his chauffeur to drive him from Preston to Lytham without stopping (at threat of being sacked), not even at the gates of his property, so smashed through the gates, damaging the car.
          ellauri197.html on line 174: He died childless in 1979, having squandered his family's wealth of several million pounds and sold their thousands of acres of land and other properties including the family seat of Lytham Hall that had belonged to the Clifton family since 1606. When he died he was almost penniless and was residing in a small rundown hotel in Brighton.
          ellauri197.html on line 176: Clifton's three books of poetry were published by Duckworth. The first was Dielma and Other Poems in 1932 and then followed Flight in 1934. One commentator has said that “Clifton was particularly adroit at poems honouring – and marvelling at – women” and the Times Literary Supplement stated that “His lyrics are a gracious tribute to the beauty of women”. These were fairly conventional poems unlike his final work Gleams Britain's Day published in 1942. The Spectator described it as “expressing in a sort of prophetic certitude opinions upon religion, patriotism, love, art, war and peace, which he puts in unconventional verse”. The reviewer stated that the book was “the product of a curious, whimsical mind, full of energy, squandering it on half-digested ideas”. W B Yates dedicated his poem, Lapis Lazuli, to Clifton who had given him a valuable Chinese lapis lazuli carving.
          ellauri197.html on line 225: He wishes his Beloved were Dead Kulzi kutistin kakarat
          ellauri197.html on line 264: He that made this knows all the cost, Se jäbä kekä kirjoitti tän tuntee asian,
          ellauri197.html on line 265: For he gave all his heart and lost. Sen muna tulee perässä pienessä lankakerässä.
          ellauri197.html on line 293: ‘How Happy I Was If I Could Forget’ is a two-stanza work where the narrator takes the reader through a series of confusing verb tenses and language choices to represent the overall lack of clarity she has for the memory that she wishes she “could forget.” The cyclical state of the stanzas’ disorganization, additionally, reflects that the narrator feels trapped in her confused loop from the memory, and the reader could finish ‘How Happy I Was If I Could Forget’ without knowing what the troubling memory is. This is yet another method of revealing the narrator’s confusion over the memory. Just as she does not know how to treat the memory, the reader does not know solid details about the memory. From start to finish then, this is a work that is structured perfectly to share and represent the narrator’s confusion.
          ellauri197.html on line 295: The shift in verb tenses is remarkable in this first stanza to address the narrator’s unclear thoughts that are connected to whatever memory she wishes to “forget.” Within the first two lines of ‘How Happy I Was If I Could Forget’, the reader encounters past tense in “was” and the subjunctive imagined prospect of “if I could forget.” This “if” indicates that this is only a wish the narrator has, meaning it is not past, present, or future because it has not happened and will not definitively ever happen. From there, the narrator turns to the present tense by saying, “how sad I am.” There is no clear way that all of these verb tenses senspibly link up, and this grammatic confusion mirrors how uncertain and shaken the narrator is from this memory’s lingering presence.
          ellauri197.html on line 297: This grammatical confusion continues in the third line where there is no subject given for the sentiment. Nothing is stated as the thing that “[w]ould be an easy adversity,” so structurally, the statement lacks clarity. A more correct formulation would be given by
          ellauri197.html on line 301: In fact, the reader might assume the thing is the memory, but the fourth line reveals that this cannot be the case. The “recollect[ion]” is addressed as a reason why the “adversity” is not “easy,” and the two cannot be the same thing. It appears then that this is a general sentiment, that the situation that created the memory would be something to “eas[ily]” push past if she could keep from “recollecting” it, but the lack of subject requires additional time to come to this conclusion, thus – again – mirroring the narrator’s uncertainty.
          ellauri197.html on line 303: The reader can infer, whatever this memory is, that it is not a good one because if it were pleasant, the narrator would not be “happy” to “forget” it, and also because the situation linked to it is noted as an “adversity.” Not only is that memory evidently unpleasant, but the scenario has an “advers[e]” effect on her current life.
          ellauri197.html on line 305: An interesting thing to note, however, is that the “adversity” is treated in a beautiful way by being addressed as a “Bloom.” The capitalization can be written off with the notion that even a bad memory could be important enough to merit capitalization, but a “Bloom” has a connotation of natural beauty and livelihood. This could simply mean the negativity from the circumstance grows with time, but the choice of such a soft verb gives the feeling that the narrator has warm feelings about whatever happened to cause this bad memory—maybe a relationship she loved but lost or a friend who was dear but forsaken. This would again give a reason for the grammatical chaos of the lack of subject and mismatched verb tenses since, it seems, the narrator does not know how she feels about the memory.
          ellauri197.html on line 309: Once more, the variation of verb tenses happens within this stanza to continue the representation of her uncertain mind frame since the “Bloom [k]eeps making November difficult,” which is present tense, but she “was almost bold,” which is past tense. Though there is a logic behind this particular verb tense change, the pattern is still striking enough to merit mention.
          ellauri197.html on line 311: Additionally, the third line of this stanza again does not have a subject for its main verb, and this format adds a bit of structure amidst the chaos since the varying verb tenses happen in the first two lines of both stanzas while the missing subject shows up in the third lines. This sustained format is an indication that this bad memory she could not “forget” keeps her in a loop she cannot break free of, as in no matter how far she tries to run from it, she always ends up dealing with the same problems again and again. The grammar details, then, mirror the circular repetition of her emotional problems.
          ellauri197.html on line 313: A piece of irony is that she claims the memory is “making November difficult,” but as “November” is the final month of autumn and a step toward harsh winter, it could be noted as one of the harsher months of the year on its own. With this in mind, her phrasing could be a subtle hint that her current state is already harsh, and perhaps she is blaming too much on the memory in regard to her unhappiness.
          ellauri197.html on line 315: Furthermore in ‘How Happy I Was If I Could Forget’, she claims to “[l]ose [her] way like a little Child [a]nd perish of the cold,” and this concept is loaded with possible meaning. For one thing, the capitalization of the word, “Child,” could indicate that perhaps she has lost a baby and is grieving that “Child.” This would clarify why she would treat the memory simultaneously as a pain and a beauty since she would treasure the “Child” itself, but abhor the pain attached to the grief. This, however, is the only speculation since it could mean that the helplessness she feels is significant enough, like a “Child” who needs care, to merit capitalization.
          ellauri197.html on line 317: Whichever is the correct explanation, the word choice makes the reference to “November” more sensible since it is the month that is on the brink of winter. In this, “November” is an indication that she is very close to being submerged into “the cold” of her sorrow over the memory, and that sorrow can cause her happiness and liveliness to “perish” just as winter can steal the livelihood of plants and nature.
          ellauri197.html on line 319: It is also noteworthy that she speaks of “perish[ing] of the cold,” not “in the cold.” This treats “the cold,” or the devastation from the memory, like a disease rather than a weather detail, which furthers the paradox of how the situation remembered is treated. In the first stanza, it “Bloom[s].” Here, it has essentially become a disease. This again mirrors the uncertainty and lack of clarity within the narrator’s thoughts regarding the situation.
          ellauri197.html on line 335: The poem, ‘Love’s Organ's Growth’, is an admirable lyric in which Donne examines the true nature of love and finds that it is mixed stuff, a mixture of both physical and spiritual elements. True love is both of the body and the mind, and to prove his point Donne gives a number of arguments and brings together a number of most disparate and varied elements.
          ellauri197.html on line 339: Oh, and love is mixed stuff, a mixture of both spiritual and physical elements. Though like the grass in this respect, it is different from it in another way. While the grass loses its life and vitality with the winter, there is no such loss in the power of love, though there may be a temporary one in love's organ. In this respect, it may be likened to a sex organ inserted in an emergency, but never withdrawn before the emergency is over.
          ellauri197.html on line 355: And of the sun his working vigor borrow, Ja jos aurinko antaa sille lisää tehoja,
          ellauri197.html on line 381: In the first stanza of ‘Love’s Organ's Growth’, the poet says that he does no longer believe his love to be so pure (simple and unmixed, hence not subject to change), and mixed, as he had earlier supposed it to be, because now he discovers that his love is subject to seasonal fluctuations and changes like the grass. Throughout the winter, the poet lied when he swore that his love was infinite, because what is infinite cannot grow and increase. Now he finds that his love has increased in vigor with the spring. Spring has made some additions to it.
          ellauri197.html on line 385: In the second stanza of ‘Love’s Organ's Growth’, this love is like a medicine that cures sorrow (on the homeopathic principle) by giving the patient more sorrow. Love is not a pure and unmixed essence that has sustaining and curative powers. It is rather a compound, mixed stuff, made up of different elements or experiences, and hence it causes pain and suffering both to the soul and the senses.
          ellauri197.html on line 389: Like other mixed stuff, love also gets an addition in its vigor and strength from the sun (his working vigor, i.e., its restorative power, its motive force, its sexual energy). Love is not as pure and unmixed as is supposed by those who have no other beloved except their poetry (i.e. those who have no practical experience of love).
          ellauri197.html on line 395: The poet here in ‘Love’s Organ's Growth’ says his love is not made larger by the spring, but more prominent, as in heaven, stars are not enlarged but revealed by the sun (the poet may mean here that as we would not be able to see the stars were not for the light which they reflect from the sun so we would not know of the existence of love, which is not for the bodily consequences of the union of souls.
          ellauri197.html on line 401: Through this extract of ‘Love’s Organ´s Growth’, the poet, John Donne, says that if love takes such additions (gentle love deeds), as more circles are produced by one stirred in water, those, like so many spheres, make only one heaven, for they are all centered in her. When the poet says: Spheres, he refers to the Ptolemaic astronomy, the spheres were a series of concentric hollow globes which revolved around the earth and carried the heavenly bodies with them. There were supposed to be nine such hollow globes and together they made up what we call the ‘heaven’.
          ellauri197.html on line 403: Here the term ‘concentrique’ means one circle within the other, or circles or globes with a common center. Here this common center is earth. Hence the spheres were supposed to be concentric or centered upon the earth. The first four lines of this extract can also be analyzed like: just as when water is stirred additional circles are produced by the original one, then these new additions will only constitute one heaven, like the spheres in the Ptolemaic astronomy form only one heaven; and that is because all these additions will be centered on you, just as in that system the spheres are all centered on the earth.
          ellauri197.html on line 442: O no, it was not this! Ei, eise ollut sitäkään!
          ellauri197.html on line 451: I saw His wisdom and his power Näin sen haban ja sen fixuuden
          ellauri197.html on line 452: In all his works displayed. Sen töissä kaikissa.
          ellauri197.html on line 455: I saw his glory shine; Se on aivan loistava,
          ellauri197.html on line 459: Deep secrets of his providence Sen suunnitelmat salaiset
          ellauri197.html on line 466: I did not tremble at his power, Mä en yhtään pelännyt,
          ellauri197.html on line 514: Loss of consortium was originally expressed in the Latin phrase "per quod servitium et consortium amisit" ("in consequence of which he lost [another person's] servitude and marital services"). The relationship between husband and wife has, historically, been considered worthy of legal protection. The interest being protected under consortium, is that which the head of the household (father or husband) had in the physical integrity of his wife, children, or servants. The undertone of this action is that the husband had an unreciprocated proprietary interest in his wife. The deprivations identified include the economic contributions of the injured spouse to the household, care and affection, and sex.
          ellauri197.html on line 516: The action was once available to a father against a man who was courting his daughter outside of marriage, on the grounds that the father had lost the consortium of his daughter's household services because she was spending time with her beau.
          ellauri197.html on line 520: Common law developed on the basis of this statute, such that the law extended from covering servants to covering family members. Since some family relationships were seen as analogous to property relationships (e.g. fathers owned their children and husbands owned their wives), harm done to family members could be seen as deprivation of benefits to the family member with legal control over them.
          ellauri197.html on line 522: For example, in Baker v Bolton (1808) 1 Camp 493, a man was permitted to recover for his loss of consortium from the carriage driver while his wife languished after a carriage accident. However, once she died from her injuries, his right to recover for lost consortium ended. (After the enactment of Lord Campbell's Act (9 and 10 Vic. c. 93) the English common law continued to prohibit recovery for loss of consortium after the death of a victim). In the 1619 case Guy v. Livesey, it is clear that precedent had been established by that time that a husband's exclusive access to the sexual services of his wife was considered to fall within the concept of 'consortium', and that an adulterer might therefore be sued for depriving a cuckold of exclusive access to the sexual services of his wife. Since adultery could not otherwise be prosecuted in secular courts for most of the period after the twelfth century, loss of consortium became an important basis for prosecution for adultery in English law.
          ellauri197.html on line 534: Gilles Saint-Paul (2008) argued, based on mathematical models, that human female hypergamy occurs because women have greater lost mating opportunity costs from monogamous mating (given their slower reproductive rate and limited window of fertility),[clarification needed] and thus must be compensated for this cost of marriage. Marriage reduces the overall genetic quality of her offspring by precluding the possibility of impregnation by a genetically higher quality male, with or without his parental investment. However, this reduction may be compensated by greater levels of parental investment by her genetically lower quality husband.
          ellauri197.html on line 538: Despite this skewed sex ratio, they found that "On education and socioeconomic status, women on average express greater hypergamic selectivity; they prefer mates who are superior to them in these traits, while men express a desire for an analogue of hypergamy based on physical attractiveness; they desire a mate who ranks higher on the physical attractiveness scale than they themselves do."
          ellauri197.html on line 546: A trophy wife is a wife who is regarded as a status symbol for the husband. The term is often used in a derogatory or disparaging way, implying that the wife in question has little personal merit besides her physical attractiveness, requires substantial expense for maintaining her appearance, is often unintelligent or unsophisticated, does very little of substance beyond remaining attractive, and is in some ways synonymous with the term gold digger. A trophy wife is typically relatively young and attractive, and may be a second, third or later wife of an older, wealthier man.
          ellauri197.html on line 550: A trophy husband is a husband who is regarded as a status symbol for the wife. The term is often used in a derogatory or disparaging way, implying that the husband in question has little personal merit besides his physical attractiveness, requires substantial expense for maintaining his appearance, is often unintelligent or unsophisticated, does very little of substance beyond remaining attractive, and is in some ways synonymous with the term gold digger. A trophy husband is typically relatively young and attractive, and may be a second, third or later husband of an older, wealthier woman.
          ellauri197.html on line 606: Precious Photo: This is where a person carries a photo of a loved one who isn't with them around them at all times. This loved one can be somebody who is dead, far away for an extended period of time or the carrier may just be a Stalker with a Crush. If the person is dead, then this symbolizes the attachment that the carrier still has. If they're far away, then this shows that the carrier is anticipating their return. If the carrier is a stalker then there are thousands more where that one came from. It may also be an Orphan's Plot Trinket, usually when kept in a locket. Even still, if the photo is ruined, there are two possible outcomes:
          ellauri197.html on line 622: Karuhko tää meidän loppusuora: kapitalismin selkävoitto, ilmastokatastrofi, mikromuovi, kiihtyneiden apinoiden kuhiseva kenno, kaiken muun elollisen luonnon joukkosukupuutto, kansainvaellus, pandemia, sota Euroopassa, josta kaikki vaan ilostelevat wannabe länkkäreinä reikäraudat tanassa. Mixei Ruozin poliisi ammu muslimeita kovilla, kysyy nuori nainen, kristitty.
          ellauri197.html on line 645: Tämmönen syxypätkä sitte vielä, missä nuori Roope sovittelee izelleen täyttä hrahalaaria ja silinteriä, nokkalaseja, damaskeja räpylään sekä whiskereitä. Ja uskon varmuutta, Roopella on oma jumala, mammona, jonka panttina on sen onnenlantti. Roope kertoo miten siitä tuli maailman äveriäin ankka, ensin kengänkiilloittaja, sitten sijoittaja... ei vaan se luki liikaa satuja pikkupoikana eikä mennyt ulos muiden kanssa leikkimään. Aikamoinen kermaperse miehexeen.
          ellauri197.html on line 647: His father was a well-paid clerk for the Bank of England, earning about £150 per year. Browning's paternal grandfather was a slave owner in Saint Kitts, West Indies, but Browning's father was an abolitionist. Browning's father had been sent to the West Indies to work on a sugar plantation, but due to a slave revolt there, had returned. Browning's mother was the daughter of a German shipowner who had settled in Dundee, Scotland, and his Scottish wife. His paternal grandmother, Margaret Tittle, had inherited a plantation in St Kitts and was rumoured in the family to have a mixed-race ancestry including some Jamaican blood, but author Julia Markus suggests she was Kittitian rather than Jamaican. The evidence is inconclusive. Robert's father, a literary collector, amassed a library of some 6,000 books, many of them rare so that Robert grew up in a household with significant literary resources. His mother, to whom he was close (no tietysti), was a devout nonconformist and a talented musician. His younger sister, Sarianna, also gifted, became her brother's "companion" in his later years, after the death of his wife in 1861. His father encouraged his children's interest in literature and the arts.
          ellauri197.html on line 649: By the age of 12, Browning had written a book of poetry, which he later destroyed for want of a publisher. After attending one or two private schools and showing an insuperable dislike of school life, he was educated at home by a tutor, using the resources of his father's library. By 14 he was fluent in French, Greek, Italian and Latin. He became an admirer of the Romantic poets, especially Shelley, whom he followed in becoming an atheist and a vegetarian (and a bisexual). At 16, he studied Greek at University College London, but left after his first year. His parents' evangelical faith prevented his studying at either Oxford or Cambridge University, both then open only to members of the Church of England. He had inherited substantial musical ability through his mother, and composed arrangements of various songs. He refused a formal career and ignored his parents' remonstrations by dedicating himself to poetry. He stayed at home until the age of 34, financially dependent on his family until his marriage. His father sponsored the publication of his son's poems. Varsinainen vanhapiika, neiti-ihminen.
          ellauri197.html on line 651: In March 1833, "Pauline, a Fragment of a Confession" was published anonymously by Saunders and Otley at the expense of the author, Robert Browning, who received the money from his aunt, Mrs Silverthorne. It is a long poem composed in homage to the poet Shelley and somewhat in his style. Originally Browning considered Pauline as the first of a series written by different aspects of himself, but he soon abandoned this idea. The press noticed the publication. However, it sold no copies. Mill oli oikeassa, narsistista jaaritusta.
          ellauri197.html on line 678: I cannot be immortal, nor taste all. O lord! where does this tend—these straggling aims!1

          ellauri198.html on line 118: Academy Award-winner Mahershala Ali plays the lead role of state police detective Wayne Hays. In an interview with Variety, Ali revealed that he was originally offered a supporting role, as the main character was supposed to be white. However, pursuing a better choice for his career, he convinced Pizzolatto that he was suited for the lead despite the pigmentation handicap. Saatiinhan värivirhe sentään korjatuxi Alin ja Rolandin urakehityxen myöhemmissä vaiheissa.
          ellauri198.html on line 121: "Warren’s preoccupation with time and how the passage of years affects memory reveals itself in his extensive use of flashbacks." No näitä takautumia piisaa Pizzalattella ihan häiriöxi saakka.
          ellauri198.html on line 125: Warren kuului agraarikkojen ryhmään, jota johti John Crowe Ransom. Warren began as an enlightened conservative Southerner. Siis kumpana? Valistuxen vaiko taantumuxen peikkona? Agrarians, with Ransom in the lead, were determined to re-endow nature with an element of horror and inscrutability and to bring back a God who permitted evil as well as good—in short, to give God back his thunder.” His main question was ‘How is one to look at life?’ Taas 1 tollanen yearning-man, wannabe uskovainen joka kaipaa jämäkämpää jumalaa joka jakaa merkityxiä kuin hihamerkkejä.
          ellauri198.html on line 129: Events convince Jack that dialectical materialism is an insufficient paradigm to explain history. "Though doomed, they had nothing to do with any doom under the godhead of the Great Twitch. They were doomed, but they lived in the agony of will." Huoh. Samanlainen tahtoihminen kuin Belovin Sale. "Minä tahdon!" huusi Riitta ja takoi päätään lattiaan. Lukisivat Rami Tuomelaa.
          ellauri198.html on line 136: Warren’s poetry is written “in a genuinely expansive, passionate style. Look at its prose ease and rapidity oddly qualified by log-piling compounds, alliteration, successive stresses, and an occasional inversion something rough and serviceable as a horse-blanket yet fancy to—and you wonder how he ever came up with it. It is excitingly massive and moulded and full of momentum. Echoes of Yeats and Auden still persist, but it is wonderfully peculiar, homemade.” His language is robust and rhetorical. He likes his adjectives and nouns to go in pairs, reinforcing one another.
          ellauri198.html on line 139: Though Warren did not deny that man is an integral part of nature, what he celebrated in his poetry was the trait that sets man apart from nature—namely, his ability (and desire) to seek knowledge in his quest “to make sense out of life.” Joopa joo. Kuten jo sainoin, jälleen 1 näitä mänttipäitä merkityxen mezästäjiä.
          ellauri198.html on line 144: Not all reviewers agree that Warren’s work deserves such unqualified praise. Though Warren tackles unquestionably important themes, his treatment of those themes borders on the bombastic. Warren becomes ridiculous on occasion, whenever we lapse from total conviction. His philosophical musings are “sometimes truly awkward and sometimes pseudo-profound.” Warren thus joins a central American tradition of speakers—Emerson, Thoreau, Henry Adams, Norman Mailer—who are not only the salesmen but the advertisers of their own snake oil.”
          ellauri198.html on line 169: In this century, and moment, of mania,
          ellauri198.html on line 179: In an idyllic moment that restages their initial meeting in 1980, Hays sticks his head into Amelia’s classroom to hear her read a bit of Delmore Schwartz’s poem “Calmly We Walk through This April’s Day.”
          ellauri198.html on line 182: Calmly We Walk through This April’s Day
          ellauri198.html on line 186: Calmly we walk through this April’s day,
          ellauri198.html on line 196: (This is the school in which we learn ...)
          ellauri198.html on line 200: (This is the school in which we learn ...)
          ellauri198.html on line 201: What is the self amid this blaze?
          ellauri198.html on line 207: (This is the school in which they learn ...)
          ellauri198.html on line 234: Let’s take time this Memorial Day weekend to remember Memorial Day 1937, when workers in Chicago were massacred by police for trying to picket against their employer, the Republic Steel Company.
          ellauri198.html on line 241: All these anti-worker policies were carried out by Democratic governors and mayors under supposedly pro-labor Roosevelt. This brought the strike to an end. Vocally radical union leaders (like John Lewis of the United Mineworkers) blamed the President, the steel companies, and excessive violence of the police. And all these factors were a real part of the loss. But these same union leaders had tied their fate to the Democratic Party. Even after the Memorial Day massacre and the defeat of the strike, they continued to support Roosevelt and the Democratic machine.
          ellauri198.html on line 254: Juostessani taxista Thean asuintalon ovelle ja soittaessani kelloa kolme kertaa en juuri pannut merkille missä olis aula, komea ja runsaasti kalustettu, ketään ei ollut saapuvilla, ja kun yritin saada selville mikä hienoista ovista kuului hissiin, erääseen niista ilmestyi valoruutu. Thea oli ajanut alas minua vastaan. Ovi avautui. Sisällä oli samettipäällysteinen penkki ja me vaivuimme istumaan sille, syleilimme ja suutelimme siittimeni noustessa äänettömästi Thean imutuxessa (Boyd kertoo samansisältöistä tarinaa skotti lastenpiiasta muistelmiensa alussa). Huomaamatta veren kovettamaa munaani Thea siveli kädellään kassejani, olkapäihin asti. Mina avasin hänen kotitakkinsa rintojen kohdalta. En hallinnut itseäni, pääsi ruiskahtamaan silmille etuajassa. En tajunnut mitään, olin miltei sokea. Jos joku muu olisi ollut sijassamme kumpikaan meistä ei olisi sitä tiennyt. En voi varmasti sanoa en nähnyt kasvoja, kenties se olikin siivooja. Kun ovi avautui, ja jatkoimme bylsimistä kävellessämme käytävässä ja sitten huoneistossa, matolla oven luona Thea ei ollut kuin muut naiset, nuo jotka niin sanoakseni antoavat luvan paljastaa yhden asian kerrallaan ja ihailla sitä, vaan päästi heti perille asti. Rakkauden tunne hallizi mahtavana. Theaa näpäsi että olin viivytellyt ammattiliittoasioissa. Olisit sanonut duunareille että "I got a chick to fuck".
          ellauri198.html on line 260: Esim Roland was the name of a real-life medieval military leader under Charlemagne who, more importantly, was the subject of the oldest surviving major work of French literature: an epic poem titled The Song of Roland. Roland was a loyal and trusting knight who was told to bring up the rear guard and burst his own temples open while sounding a horn too vigorously. What a way to go! In 1855, Robert Browning made the warrior the subject of his poem “Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came,” which leads us back to Stephen King, of all the U.S. turds. It’s a bit incongruous to think of Dorff’s Roland West—an uncouth man who refers to “Saigon trim” and is eager to start a fight.
          ellauri198.html on line 284: He slew them, at surprising distances, with his gun. Over a body held in his hand, his head was bowed low,
          ellauri198.html on line 292: This poem is dedicated to the famous naturalist John James Audubon (as in Audubon society), and describes that man’s real-life practice of killing the birds he famously drew. He would use “fine shot” so as not to mutilate them, in order to deliver the best approximation of what they looked like in life. Warren doesn’t necessarily pass judgment on Audubon in this poem, but we might. All this cold, calculated murder in pursuit of “knowledge,” a.k.a. Audubon’s well-read work and much-regarded art; does it feel worth it?
          ellauri198.html on line 294: But of course, the Warren lines that stick out the most in the context of this episode is this: “In this century, and moment, of mania / Tell me a story.” On the one hand, this “century of mania” could refer to any modern hundred-year range we chose. So this HBO series itself is a story told in a century of mania. But if some of the implications of the post-murder turmoil that might over-take this town come true, then the case of the missing Purcell kids is, specifically, the story of a moment of mania known as “Satanic Panic,” which swept the nation in the 1980s and early 90s.
          ellauri198.html on line 296: The Satanic panic is a moral panic consisting of over 12,000 unsubstantiated cases of Satanic ritual abuse (SRA, sometimes known as ritual abuse, ritualistic abuse, organized abuse, or sadistic ritual abuse) starting in the United States in the 1980s, spreading throughout many parts of the world by the late 1990s, and persisting today. The panic originated in 1980 with the publication of Michelle Remembers, a book co-written by Canadian psychiatrist Lawrence Pazder and his patient (and future wife), Michelle Smith, which used the discredited practice of recovered-memory therapy to make sweeping lurid claims about satanic ritual abuse involving Smith. The allegations which afterwards arose throughout much of the United States involved reports of physical and sexual abuse of people in the context of occult or Satanic rituals. In its most extreme form, allegations involve a conspiracy of a global Satanic cult that includes the wealthy and powerful world elite in which children are abducted or bred for human sacrifices, pornography, and prostitution, an allegation that returned to prominence in the form of Qanon.
          ellauri198.html on line 298: Nearly every aspect of the ritual abuse is controversial, including its definition, the source of the allegations and proof thereof, testimonies of alleged victims, and court cases involving the allegations and criminal investigations. The panic affected lawyers, therapists, and social workers who handled allegations of child sexual abuse. Allegations initially brought together widely dissimilar groups, including religious fundamentalists, police investigators, child advocates, therapists, and clients in psychotherapy. The term satanic abuse was more common early on; this later became satanic ritual abuse and further secularized into simply ritual abuse. Over time, the accusations became more closely associated with dissociative identity disorder (then called multiple personality disorder) and anti-government conspiracy theories.
          ellauri198.html on line 311: "In this century, and moment, of mania
          ellauri198.html on line 325:

          The title, "Childe Roland into the Dark Tunnel Came", which forms the last words of the poem, is a line from William Shakespeare's play King Lear (ca. 1607). In the play, Gloucester's son, Edgar, lends credence to his disguise as Tom o' Bedlam by talking nonsense, of which this is a part:
          ellauri198.html on line 331: Albumin 340 välipalana lukaisin King Learin uudestaan, se on kyllä tosi onneton. Lyhyesti tiivistäen, king Learilla on kolme tyärtä, joista 2 vanhempaa nuolee ahkerasti kingin pyllyvakoa ja saa isot läänityxet kinkun retardoituessa, Cordelia (henceforth Corzu) ei mielistele, so the king has a cow ja tekee Corzun perinnöttömäxi. Burgundi ei huoli sitä, mutta Ranu ottaa. Sitten isosiskot alkaa kohdella ex-kinkkua kuin halpaa makkaraa. Jotain sivujuonta Glosterin äijästä ja sen 2 pojasta joista äpärä Edmundista tulee pahis ja Edgar ('Tom') esittää yhtä hullua kuin oikeesti hullaantuva ex-kurnupää. Styken päähuvi tulee näistä hulluista ja yhestä muuten vaan narrista. Kohta Glosterin äijää vedetään parrasta ja silmät kaivetaan ulos päästä, mikä on puolestaan pätkän parasta gorea. Konna Oswald [Dies.] Cordelia tulee Ranun kaa miehittämään Britanniaa. Britannia voittaa (tietysti). Corzun tsykologi parantaa Learin psykoosin, mutta liian myöhäistä: isotsiskot nirhaa toisensa, Cordelia epähuomiossa hirtetään, ja Lear kuolee apoplexiaan. Kaikki naiset on nyt tapettu, jälelle jää 2 hyvistä, mitätön Kent ja vetku Edgar. (Kentistä ei tullut mitään sanotuxi, mutta se onkin varsin mitäänsanomaton.)
          ellauri198.html on line 337: The sunset sets the scene ablaze at that very moment, and a strange sound fills the air. "[I]n a sheet of flame" Roland sees the faces of his dead friends, and hears their names whispered in his ears. Remembering their lives, Roland finds himself surrounded by a "living frame" of old friends. Filled with inspiration, he pulls out his "slug-horn", and blows, shouting "Childe Roland into the dark tunnel came".
          ellauri198.html on line 339: At this, the poem ends, leaving what lies inside of the Dark Tunnel a mystery.
          ellauri198.html on line 344: A footnote in the Penguin Classics edition (Robert Browning Selected Poems) advises against allegorical interpretation, saying “readers who wish to try their hand should be warned that the enterprise strongly resembles carving a statue out of fog." This sentiment is echoed by many critics, who believe any quest for interpretation will ultimately fail, due to the dreamlike, illusionary nature of the poem.
          ellauri198.html on line 346: William Lyon Phelps (n.h.) proposes three different interpretations of the poem: In the first two, the Tower is a symbol of a knightly dick. Success only comes through failure or the end is the realization of futility. In his third interpretation, the Tower is simply a damn big tunnel.
          ellauri198.html on line 348: For Margaret Atwood, Childe Roland is Browning himself, his quest is to write this poem, and the Dark Tower contains that which Roland/Browning fears most: a damn big tunnel.
          ellauri198.html on line 350: Harold Bloom reads the poem as a "loving critique" of Shelley, and describes Roland as questing for his own (Bloom's) failure.
          ellauri198.html on line 362: Askance to watch the working of his lie Valeen tehoa kun karsasteli,
          ellauri198.html on line 368: What else should he be set for, with his staff? Mitä varten muuten sillä keppi
          ellauri198.html on line 369: What, save to waylay with his lies, ensnare Olis ojossa kuin maantieviitta,
          ellauri198.html on line 376: If at his counsel I should turn aside Jos mä noudattaisin opastusta,
          ellauri198.html on line 401: Be room enough for this, and when a day Liian hyvä tälle, ja millaiset
          ellauri198.html on line 408: Thus, I had so long suffered in this quest, Olin niin pitkään ollut siinä jengissä
          ellauri198.html on line 417: That hateful cripple, out of his highway Ällön jalkapuolen, lähdin pusikkoon
          ellauri198.html on line 444: 'Tis the Last Judgment's fire must cure this place, Tän parantaa vasta lopun ajan sonta,
          ellauri198.html on line 448: If there pushed any ragged thistle-stalk Jos jossain oli edes ohdakkeen korsia
          ellauri198.html on line 459: One stiff blind horse, his every bone a-stare, Kankea ja sokko heppa, takkukarvanen,
          ellauri198.html on line 492: Pin to his breast a parchment? His own bands Me hirtettiin se leväperäinen
          ellauri198.html on line 496: Better this present than a past like that; Parempi tää nykyinen kuin mennyt toi;
          ellauri198.html on line 507: This, as it frothed by, might have been a bath Karanneen suihkukuulokkeen lailla loikki
          ellauri198.html on line 523: For hollows, tangled in his hair or beard! Ja osuisi sen karvaisimpiin reikiin!
          ellauri198.html on line 541: Pits for his pastime, Christians against Jews. taisteluttais murkkuja kuin härkiä.
          ellauri198.html on line 555: Makes a thing and then mars it, till his mood olis tehnyt huvixeen muraa rapaista,
          ellauri198.html on line 572: Sailed past, nor beat his wide wing dragon-penned Pitääkö tämäkin limbo vielä niellä?
          ellauri198.html on line 587: Progress this way. When, in the very nick Tähän päättyi edistys, jäin pälkähään.
          ellauri198.html on line 593: This was the place! those two hills on the right, Et tää se 1 paikka selvästikin on!
          ellauri198.html on line 637: Archaeologists have applied the term "tophet" to large cemeteries of children found at Carthaginian sites that have traditionally been believed to house the victims of child sacrifice, as described by Hellenistic and biblical sources. This interpretation is controversial, with some scholars arguing that the tophets may have been children's cemeteries, rejecting Hellenistic sources as anti-Carthaginian propaganda. Others argue that not all burials in the tophet were sacrifices.
          ellauri198.html on line 645: Roland's band had dissolved and gone on to solo careers. Cuthbert was cut up for "one night's disgrace," and Giles "by being hanged and declared a traitor by his fans." All Roland wants is to join back the band, whatever the cost.
          ellauri198.html on line 650: In turn this influenced the pseudo-Medieval poetry of Thomas Chatterton. For example, in a poem about the Battle of Hastings he writes "some caught a slughorne and an onsett wounde" (Battle of Hastings ii.99), meaning "some picked up a slughorn and sounded a charge". A slughorn in this context appears to be some kind of trumpet. However, in a footnote to another usage of the word, Chatterton defines it as "not unlike a hautboy". The Medieval English word hautboy is the origin of the modern word oboe and has never referred to any instrument comparable to a trumpet. It is more like a faggot. Oh boy, haut-bois, puu pystyssä. Vitun pultti-bois.
          ellauri198.html on line 652: Chatterton's usage inspired Robert Browning in his poem Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came, in particular the last stanza in which the hero sees the ghosts of all those who died trying to reach the Dark Tower before him.
          ellauri198.html on line 672: American author Stephen King stole the name for his The Dark Tower series of stories and novels (1978–2012).
          ellauri198.html on line 680: In P.G. Wodehouse's novel The Code of the Woosters: Jeeves also uses the phrase 'Childe Roland to the dark tower came' to describe Bertie Wooster's arrival, in this case, at Totleigh Towers. Bertie does not understand the reference in this case either.
          ellauri198.html on line 684: The scottish "narrative" or fairy tale about Childe Rowland comes from Danish ballads about Rosmer Halfmand from the 1695 work Kaempe Viser. There were three ballads about Rosmer, who was a giant or merman, stealing a girl whose brother later rescues her. In the first, the characters are the children of Lady Hillers of Denmark, and the sister is named Svanè. In the second, the main characters are Roland and Proud Eline lyle. In the third, the hero is Child Aller, son of the king of Iceland. Unlike the English Roland, the hero of the Danish ballads relies on trickery to rescue his sister, and in some versions they have a juicy incestuous relationship to boot.
          ellauri198.html on line 689: Robert Browning (7 May 1812 - 12 December 1889) ranks No. 8,206 among the Most Man-Crushed-Upon Celebrity Men, and ranks 12,642nd among all celebrities on the Top Celebrity Crushes list. Robert Browning is straight. Scroll down and check out his short and medium hairstyles.
          ellauri198.html on line 691: In March 1833, "Pauline, a Fragment of a Confession" was published anonymously by Saunders and Otley at the expense of the author, Robert Browning, who received the money from his aunt, Mrs Silverthorne. It is a long poem composed in homage to the poet Shelley and somewhat in his style. Originally Browning considered Pauline as the first of a series written by different aspects of himself, but he soon abandoned this idea. John Stuart Mill, however, wrote that the author suffered from an "intense and morbid self-consciousness". Later Browning was rather embarrassed by the work.
          ellauri198.html on line 693: In 1838, he visited Italy looking for background for Sordello, a long poem in heroic couplets, presented as the imaginary biography of the Mantuan bard spoken of by Dante in the Divine Comedy, canto 6 of Purgatory, set against a background of hate and conflict during the Guelph-Ghibelline wars. This was published in 1840 and met with widespread derision, gaining him the reputation of wanton carelessness and obscurity. Tennyson commented that he only understood the first and last lines and Carlyle wrote that his wife had read the poem through and could not tell whether Sordello was a man, a city or a book. Ai tän mä taisinkin jo kertoa albumissa 54.
          ellauri198.html on line 695: In 1845, at 32, Browning met the poet Elizabeth Barrett, 38, six years his senior, who lived as a semi-invalid in her father's house in Wimpole Street, London. They began regularly corresponding and gradually a romance developed between them, leading to their marriage and journey to Italy (for Elizabeth's health) on 12 September 1846.
          ellauri198.html on line 697: From the time of their marriage and until Elizabeth's death, the Brownings lived in Italy, residing first in Pisa, and then, within a year, finding an apartment in Florence at Casa Guidi (now a museum to their memory). Their only child, Robert Wiedemann Barrett Browning, nicknamed "Penine" or "Pen", was born in 1849. In these years Browning was fascinated by, and learned from, the art and atmosphere of Italy. He would, in later life, describe Italy as his university. As Elizabeth had inherited money of her own, the couple were reasonably comfortable in Italy, and their relationship together was happy. However, the literary assault on Browning's work did not let up and he was critically dismissed further, by patrician writers such as Charles Kingsley, for the desertion of England for foreign lands.
          ellauri198.html on line 699: Browning believed spiritualism to be fraud, and proved one of Daniel Dunglas Home's most adamant critics. When Browning and his wife Elizabeth attended one of his séances on 23 July 1855. a spirit face materialized, which Home claimed was Browning's son who had died in infancy: Browning seized the "materialization" and discovered it to be Home's bare foot. To make the deception worse, Browning had never lost a son in infancy.
          ellauri198.html on line 701: In 1861, Elizabeth died in Florence. Among those whom he found vaguely consoling in that period was the novelist and poet Isa Blagden, with whom he and his wife had a voluminous correspondence. The following year Browning returned to London, taking his Pen with him, who by then was 12 years old.
          ellauri198.html on line 708: The Dark Tower is a series of eight novels and one short story written by American author Stephen King. Incorporating themes from multiple genres, including dark fantasy, science fantasy, horror, and Western, it describes a "gunslinger" and his quest toward a tower, the nature of which is both physical and metaphorical. The series, and its use of the Dark Tower, expands upon Stephen King's multiverse and in doing so, links together many of his other novels.
          ellauri198.html on line 710: The series was chiefly inspired by the poem "Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came" by Robert Browning, whose full text was included in the final volume's appendix. In the preface to the revised 2003 edition of The Gunslinger, King also identifies The Lord of the Rings, Arthurian legend, and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly as inspirations. He identifies Clint Eastwood's "Man with No Name" character as one of the major inspirations for the protagonist, Roland Deschain. King's style of location names in the series, such as Mid-World, and his development of a unique language abstract to our own [clarification needed] (High Speech), are also influenced by J. R. R. Tolkien's work. The series is referred to on King's website as his magnum opus.
          ellauri198.html on line 720: Beginning where book six left off, Jake Chambers and Father Callahan battle the evil infestation within the Dixie Pig, a vampire lounge in New York City featuring roast human flesh and doors to other worlds. After fighting off and destroying numerous "Low-Men" and Type One Vampires, Callahan sacrifices himself to let Jake survive. In the other world—Fedic—Mia, her body now physically separated from Susannah Dean, gives birth to Mordred Deschain, the biological son of Roland Deschain and Susannah. The Crimson King is also a "co-father" of this prophetic child, so it is not surprising when "baby" Mordred's first act is to shapeshift into a spider-creature and feast on his birth-mother. Susannah shoots but fails to kill Mordred, eliminates other agents of the Crimson King, and escapes to meet up with Jake at the cross-dimensional door beneath the Dixie Pig which connects to Fedic. Maturing at an accelerated rate, Mordred later stalks Roland and the other gunslingers throughout this adventure, shifting from human to spider as the need arises, seething with an instinctive rage toward Roland, his "white daddy."
          ellauri198.html on line 722: In Maine, Roland and Eddie recruit John Cullum, and then make their way back to Fedic, where the ka-tet is now reunited. Walter (known in other stories as Randall Flagg) plans to slay Mordred and use the birthmark on Mordred's heel to gain access to the Tower, but he is easily slain by the infant when Mordred sees through his lies.
          ellauri198.html on line 724: Roland and his ka-tet travel to Thunderclap, then to the nearby Devar-Toi, to help a group of psychics known as Breakers who are allowing their telepathic abilities to be used to break away at the beams that support the Tower. Ted Brautigan and Dinky Earnshaw assist the gunslingers with information and weapons, and reunite Roland with his old friend Sheemie Ruiz from Mejis. The Gunslingers free the Breakers from their captors, but Eddie is wounded after the battle and dies a short while later. Roland and Jake pause to mourn and then jump to Maine of 1999 along with Oy, in order to save the life of Stephen King (whom he writes to be a secondary character in the book); the ka-tet have come to believe that the success of their quest depends on King surviving to write about it through his books.
          ellauri198.html on line 726: They discover King about to be hit by a van. Jake pushes King out of the way but Jake is killed in the process. Roland, heartbroken with the loss of the person he considers his true son, buries Jake and returns with Oy to Susannah in Fedic, via the Dixie Pig. They are chased through the depths of Castle Discordia by an otherworldly monster, then depart and travel for weeks across freezing badlands toward the Tower.
          ellauri198.html on line 728: Along the way they find Patrick Danville, a young man imprisoned by someone who calls himself Joe Collins but is really a psychic vampire named Dandelo. Dandelo feeds off the emotions of his victims, and starts to feed off of Roland and Susannah by telling them jokes. Roland and Susannah are alerted to the danger by Stephen King, who drops clues directly into the book, enabling them to defeat the vampire. They discover Patrick in the basement, and find that Dandelo had removed his tongue. Patrick is freed and soon his special talent becomes evident: his drawings and paintings become reality. As their travels bring them nearer to the Dark Tower, Susannah comes to the conclusion that Roland needs to complete his journey without her. Susannah asks Patrick to draw a door she has seen in her dreams to lead her out of this world. He does so and once it appears, Susannah says goodbye to Roland and crosses over to another world.
          ellauri198.html on line 730: Mordred finally reaches and attacks Roland. Oy viciously defends his dinh, providing Roland the extra seconds needed to exterminate the were-spider. Oy is impaled on a tree branch and dies. Roland continues on to his ultimate goal and reaches the Tower, only to find it occupied by the Crimson King.
          ellauri198.html on line 732: They remain in a stalemate for a few hours, until Roland has Patrick draw a picture of the Crimson King and then erase it, thus wiping him out of existence except for his eyes. Roland gains entry into the Tower while Patrick turns back home. The last scene is that of Roland crying out the names of his loved ones and fallen comrades as he had vowed to do. The door of the Dark Tower closes shut as Patrick watches from a distance.
          ellauri198.html on line 734: The story then shifts to Susannah coming through the magic door to an alternate 1980s New York, where Gary Hart is president. Susannah throws away Roland's gun (which does not function on this side of the door), rejecting the life of a gunslinger, and starts a new life with alternate versions of Eddie and Jake, who in this world are brothers with the surname Toren. They have only very vague memories of their previous journey with Susannah, whose own memories of Mid-World are already beginning to fade. It is implied that an alternate version of Oy, the billy-bumbler, will also join them.
          ellauri198.html on line 736: In a final "Coda" section, King urges the reader to close the book at this point, consider the story finished with a happy ending, and not venture inside the Tower with Roland. For those who do not heed the warning, the story resumes with Roland stepping into the Dark Tower. He realizes that the Tower is not really made of stone, but a kind of flesh: it is Gan's physical body. As he climbs the steps, Roland encounters various rooms containing siguls or signs of his past life. When he reaches the top of the Tower, he finds a door marked with his own name and opens it. Roland instantly realizes, to his horror, that he has reached the Tower countless times before. He is forced through the door by the hands of Gan and transported back in time to the Mohaine desert, back to where he was at the beginning of The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger, with no memories of what has just occurred. The only difference is that, this time, Roland possesses the Horn of Eld, which in the previous incarnation he had left lying on the ground after the Battle of Jericho Hill. Roland hears the voice of Gan, whispering that, if he reaches the Tower again, perhaps this time the result will be different; there may yet be rest. The series ends where it began in the first line of book one: "The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed."
          ellauri198.html on line 755: Ei vaan Browning imuskelee kolleegansa Shellyn schollya, Harold täsmentää. The consensus among critics has long been that in his youth Browning had a great enthusiasm for Shelley, an enthusiasm clearly apparent in Pauline and Paracelsus, but abruptly extinguished in Sordello. Generally speaking, it would seem that Browning's ardent enthusiasm for Shelley the poet ends with Sordello in 1840, just as his respect for Shelley the man ends in 1856, with the discovery that he had abandoned his first wife. Any evidence for a lapse of his disaffection in later life seems effectively countered by Browning's own testimony in a letter written in 1885 to F. J. Furnivall, refusing the presidency of the newly formed Shelley Society: “For myself, I painfully contrast my notions of Shelley the man and Shelley, well, even the poet, with what they were sixty years ago, when I only had his works, for a certainty, and took his character on trust.” With these highlights of the relationship, most Browning critics and biographers terminate the discussion.
          ellauri198.html on line 772: Toi Condition of Fire and Election-Love taitaa olla jotain kabbalismia (kz alla). Love, love, love. Kabbalah says that the only force in reality is the force of love. Evidently, without love, there is no life. Make love not war. (No siinähän se tuli!) This is why Kabbalah says that Creator, nature, and love are synonymous. Tucker Carlson Wears a Kabbalah Bracelet. It has been absolutely infuriating to watch supposedly "awake" people promote Tucker Carlson as some kind of mainstream hero. He is obviously a servant of the Jews and this is just one more piece of evidence.
          ellauri198.html on line 778: But something of the conclusion can be surmised here, however tentatively. Roland's equivocal triumph is an instance of Kierkegaardian "repetition" rather than of Platonic "recollection" on Hegelian "mediation," if only because the Romantic trope-upon-a-trope or transumption leads to a projective or introjective stance of which Kierkegaard is the conscious anti-Platonic and anti-Hegelian theorist. Precisely what Roland refuses is the Golgotha of Absolute Spirit that Hegel proclaims at the very close of his Phenomenology:
          ellauri198.html on line 780: Knowledge is aware not only of itself, but also of the negative of itself, or its limit. Knowing its limit means knowing how to sacrifice itself. This sacrifice is... self-abandonment.... Here it has to begin all over again at its immediacy, as freshly as before, and thence rise once more to the measure of its stature, as if, for it, all that preceded were lost, and as if it had learned nothing from the experience of the spirits that preceded. But re collection has conserved that experience, and is the inner being, and, in fact, the higher form of the substance. While, then, this phase of Spirit begins all over again its formative development, apparently starting solely from itself, yet at the same time it com mences at a higher level. The realm of spirits developed in this way, and assuming definite shape in existence, constitutes a succession, where one detaches and sets loose the other, and each takes over from its predecessor the empire of the spiritual world...
          ellauri198.html on line 782: Against this high idealism of what is essentially the influence process, we can set one of Kierkegaard's central insights:
          ellauri198.html on line 786: From Hegel we can move to Mallarmé's Igitur, and an illuminating observation by Paul de Man, even as from Kierkegaard we can go back to Childe Roland and the critical mode I endeavor to develop. Meditating on Igitur, de Man remarks that in Baudelaire and in Mallarmé (under Baudelaire's influence) "ennui" is no longer a personal feeling but comes from the burden of the past. A consciousness comes to know itself as negative and finite. It sees that others know themselves also in this way, and so it transcends the negative and finite present by seeing the universal nature of what it itself is becoming. So, de Man says of Mallarmé's view, comparing it to Hegel's, that "we develop by dominating our natural anxiety and alienation and by transforming it in the awareness and the knowledge of otherness." Jotain tosi narsistista läppää tääkin näyttää olevan.
          ellauri198.html on line 794: Roland is not mediated by his precursors; they do not detach him from history so as to free him in the spirit. The Childe's last act of dauntless courage is to will repetition, to accept his place in the company of the ruined. Roland tells us implicitly that the present is not so much negative and finite as it is willed, though this willing is never the work of an individual consciousness acting by itself. It is caught up in a subject-to-subject dialectic, in which the present moment is sacrificed, not to the energies of art, but to the near-solipsist's tragic victory over himself. Roland's negative moment is neither that of renunciation nor of the loss of self in death or error. It is the negativity that is self-knowledge yielding its power to a doomed love of others, in the recognition that those others like Shelley. more grandly had surrendered knowledge and its powers to love, however illusory. Or, mos simply, Childe Roland dies, if be dies, in the magnificence of a belatedness that can accept itself as such. He ends in strengh because his vision has ceased to break and deform the world, and has begun to turn its dangerous strength upon is own defense. Roland is the Kermit modem version of a poet-as-hero, and his sustained courage to weather his own phantasmagoria and emerge into fire is a presage of the continued survival of strong poetry.
          ellauri198.html on line 821: William Butler Yeats is widely considered to be one of the greatest poets of the 20th century. He belonged to the Protestant, Anglo-Irish minority that had controlled the economic, political, social, and cultural life of Ireland since at least the end of the 17th century. Most members of this minority considered themselves English people who happened to have been born in Ireland, but Yeats staunchly flagged his fake Irish nationality. Although he lived in London for 14 years of his childhood (and kept a permanent home there for 30 years), Yeats magnified his cultural roots, featuring Irish legends and heroes in many of his poems and plays.
          ellauri198.html on line 823: Spending most of his time in London, Yeats met with Maud Gonne, a tall, beautiful, socially prominent young woman passionately devoted to Irish nationalism. Yeats soon fell in love with Gonne, and courted her for nearly three decades although he eventually learned that she had already borne two children from a long affair. Their sole attempt at copulation at long last in Paris ended with a fizz. Yeats found he actually really liked young boys and girls.
          ellauri198.html on line 824: He was equally firm in adhering to his self-image as an artist. This conviction led many to accuse him of elitism, but conscious and undaunted image building also unquestionably contributed to his greatness.
          ellauri198.html on line 826: Gonne shared Yeats’s interest in occultism and spiritualism. Yeats had been a theosophist, but in 1890 he turned from its sweeping mystical insights and joined the Golden Dawn, a secret society that actually practiced ritual magic. Yeats remained an active member of the Golden Dawn for 32 years, becoming involved in its direction at the turn of the century and achieving the coveted sixth grade of membership in 1914, the same year that his surrogate wife, Georgiana Hyde-Lees, also joined the society.
          ellauri198.html on line 828: Yeats kept his sixth-grader occultist badge away from his poems, which are simple enough to be understood by sixth-graders, unlike Blake and Shelley, but like his rhyming predecessor Keats. Even so, Yeats’s visionary and idealist interests were more closely aligned with those of Blake and Shelley than with those of Keats, and in the 1899 collection The Wind among the Reeds the occult symbolism rears its ugly head in several poems.
          ellauri198.html on line 831: His several boring plays featured fictional heroic ancient Irish warrior Cuchulain. A later poem concludes with a brash announcement: “There’s more enterprise in walking naked.” This indecent departure from a conventional 19th-century manner disappointed his contemporary readers, who preferred the pleasant musicality of such familiar poems as “The Lake Isle of Innisfree,” which he wrote in 1890. "I think all happiness depends on the energy to assume the mask of some other person, on strutting as somebody else but yourself", he said. Yeats and his lamentable wife held more than 400 sessions of automatic writing, producing nearly 4,000 pages that Yeats avidly and patiently studied and organized. What an idiot.
          ellauri198.html on line 833: From these sessions Yeats formulated theories about life and history. He believed that certain patterns existed, the most important being what he called gyres, interpenetrating cones representing mixtures of opposites of both a personal and historical nature. He contended that gyres were initiated by the divine impregnation of a mortal woman—first, the rape of Leda by Zeus; later, the conception of Mary by the same immaculate swan. As Lewis Carroll had prophecied:
          ellauri198.html on line 843: He took his vorpal sword in hand;
          ellauri198.html on line 846: While Yeats was playing with esoterica, Ireland was rife with internal strife and a world war flitted past. He was now the “sixty-year-old smiling public man” of his poem “Among School Children,” which he wrote after touring an Irish elementary school. He was also a world-renowned artist of impressive stature, having received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1923. At night the poet could “sweat with terror” because of the surrounding violence, but otherwise he was enjoying himself royally. His collection The Dark Tower (1928) is often considered his best single book.
          ellauri198.html on line 848: Another important element of poems in both these collections and other volumes is Yeats’s keen awareness of old age. Even his romantic poems from the late 1890s often mention gray hair and weariness, though those poems were written while he was still a young man. But when Yeats was nearly 60, his health began to fail and he was faced with real, rather than imaginary, “bodily decrepitude” (a phrase from “After Long Silence”) and nearness to death. Despite the author’s often keen awareness of his physical decline, the last 15 years of his life were marked by extraordinary vitality and an appetite for life, including young boys and girls.
          ellauri198.html on line 849: His pose as “The Wild Old Wicked Man” (the title of one of his poems) and his poetical revitalization was reflected in the title of his 1938 volume New Poems.
          ellauri198.html on line 851: As Yeats aged, he saw Ireland change in ways that angered him. The Anglo-Irish Protestant minority no longer controlled Irish society and culture. According to Yeats’s unblushingly antidemocratic view, the greatness of Anglo-Irishmen such as Jonathan Swift, philosopher George Berkeley, and statesman Edmund Burke, contrasted sharply with the undistinguished commonness of contemporary Irish society, which seemed preoccupied with the interests of merchants and bloody peasants. He laid out his unpopular opinions in late plays such as Purgatory (1938) and the essays of On the Boiler (1939).
          ellauri198.html on line 853: He faced death with a courage that was founded partly on his vague hope for reincarnation. In his proud moods he could speak in the stern voice of his famous epitaph, written within six months of his death, which concludes his poem “Under Ben Bulben”: “Cast a cold eye / On life, on death. / Horseman, pass by!” But the bold sureness of those lines is complicated by the terror-stricken cry that “distracts my thought” at the end of another late poem, “The Man and the Echo,” and also by the poignantly frivolous lust for life in the last lines of “Politics,” the poem that he wanted to close Last Poems: “But O that I were young again / And held them in my arms.”
          ellauri198.html on line 858: Fellow anglo-saxon poets, including his catamite W.H. Auden (who praised Yeats as the savior of English lyric poetry), Stephen Spender, Theodore Roethke, and Philip Larkin thought he was the cat's whiskers.
          ellauri198.html on line 864: William Butler Yeats published his poem ‘The Lake Isle of Innisfree’ in December of 1890, an important year in his life due to his increased association with occult societies in London, United Kingdom. In ‘The Lake Isle of Innisfree,’ William Butler Yeats’ narrator asserts his desire to leave the “pavement gray” of his current locale and dwell on the mysterious island of Innisfree, with only bees, crickets, and linnets for a company (and, alas, mosquitoes).
          ellauri198.html on line 868: Critics of the poem have highlighted several important aspects of ‘The Lake Isle of Innisfree,’ including the spiritual journey undertaken by William Butler Yeats (Hunter); the island as an escape from sexuality (Merritt); and the island as a place of wisdom or foolishness, depending on varying historical perspectives on beans (Normandin). To these critics, it seems that an island is a place of refuge from a dangerous outside world — supposedly London specifically, although Merritt might broaden this interpretation to include all sexual encounters. While these critics acknowledge that an island is a place of escape, citing what William Butler Yeats himself has said about the Irish island Sligo, they fall short of recognising the full implications of his fascination with the occult.
          ellauri198.html on line 874: There are two realities, the terrestrial and the condition of fire. 1 All power is from the terrestrial condition, for there all opposites meet and there only is the extreme of choice possible, full freedom. [This seems inaccurate slightly, the terrestrial or earthly condition contains the condition of fire, water, and air; the mental, the material, and mental-material interaction respectively. How to distinctly separate water and earth is an issue going back at least to the Corpus Hermeticum.] And there the heterogeneous is, evil, for evil is the strain one upon another of opposites; but in the condition of fire is all music and rest. [Compare this with interpretations of Manichean or Gnostic dualism that there is a pure and impure world; castor and pollux.] Between is the condition of air where images have but a borrowed life, that of memory or that reflected upon them when they symbolise colours and intensities of fire; the place of shades who are 'in the whirl of those who are fading,' and who cry like those amorous shades in the Japanese play:-- Huoh, ei jaxa. Tää kaverihan oli täysin tärähtänyt:
          ellauri198.html on line 876: I assert that the symbols which William Butler Yeats includes on the island — specifically the nine bean-rows — are meant to be examined in the light of the Kabbalism, numerology, and tarot cards to which these societies looked for inspiration in their occult practices. Through his inclusion of these symbols, William Butler Yeats is demonstrating mastery over the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn’s basic tenants (sic), a mastery which he perhaps hoped would help him advance in rank in the society to seventh grade and further his studies of magic.
          ellauri198.html on line 881: Hyperion, a Fragment is an abandoned epic poem by 19th-century English Romantic poet John Keats. It was published in Lamia, Isabella, The Eve of St. Agnes, and Other Poems (1820). It is based on the Titanomachia, and tells of the despair of the Titans after their fall to the Olympians. Keats wrote the poem from late 1818 until the spring of 1819, when he gave it up as having "too many Miltonic inversions." He was also nursing his younger brother Tom, who died on 1 December 1818 of tuberculosis.
          ellauri198.html on line 883: In Greek mythology, Hyperion (/haɪˈpɪəriən/; Greek: Ὑπερίων, 'he who goes above') was one of the twelve Titan children of Gaia (Earth) and Uranus (Sky). With his sister, the Titaness Theia, Hyperion fathered Helios (Sun), Selene (Moon) and Eos (Dawn). Well, his sister mothered them, after he had squirted his load of cum into her.
          ellauri198.html on line 885: Hyperion was, along with his son Helios, a personification of the sun, with the two sometimes identified. John Keats's abandoned epic poem Hyperion is among the literary works that feature the figure.
          ellauri198.html on line 887: Keats picked up the ideas again in his another unfinished poem The Fall of Hyperion: A Dream (1856) published after his death. He attempted to recast the epic by framing it with a personal quest to find truth and understanding. Another failure. Yawn.
          ellauri198.html on line 889: The poem as usually printed breaks off at this point, in mid-line, with the word "celestial". Keats's friend Richard Woodhouse, transcribing this poem, completed this line as "Celestial Glory dawn'd: he was a god!" Ox, nyet! nyet! The language of Hyperion is very similar to Milton's, in metre and style. However, his characters are quite different. Although Apollo falls into the image of the "Son" from Paradise Lost and of "Jesus" from Paradise Regained, he does not directly confront Hyperion as Satan is confronted. Also, the roles are reversed, and Apollo is deemed as the "challenger" to the throne, who wins it by being more "true" and thus, more "beautiful." Double yawn.
          ellauri198.html on line 894: The Triumph of Life was the last major work by Percy Bysshe Shelley before his death in 1822. The work was left unfinished. Shelley wrote the poem at Casa Magni in Lerici, Italy in the early summer of 1822. He modelled the poem, written in terza rima, on Petrarch 's Trionfi and Dante 's Divine Comedy. Siinäkin on julkkixia jossain helvetissä. Kesken jäi. Gäsp.
          ellauri198.html on line 902: Of what was once Rousseau—nor this disguise
          ellauri198.html on line 917: Pauline: A Fragment of a Confession (also known as Pauline) is the first published poem by Robert Browning. It was written in 1832, and published anonymously in 1833. The poem is the confession of an unnamed poet to his lover, the eponymous woman. It was first reprinted in 1868 with no alterations to the text.
          ellauri203.html on line 111: Literary critic V. Belinsky was one of the leaders of the westernist movement. He was a convinced atheist. In his understanding, Russia’s transformation would be impossible without eliminating Christianity.
          ellauri203.html on line 113: Belinsky preached his socialist-atheist way with such passion that Dostoevsky couldn’t resist. Accepting the socialist teachings of Belinsky, Dostoevsky saw his Christian convictions being shattered. He describes this time as the time of “losing Christ”. “We were infected with the ideas of theoretical socialism of those days!” – Dostoevsky would recall. For his involvement in the antigovernment movement, Dostoevsky was sentenced to capital punishment, which was later replaced with four years of penal labor (Rus. katorga).
          ellauri203.html on line 115: In penal servitude, Dostoevsky went through something that he calls “the regeneration of his convictions”. What could have taken place to change his convictions so completely? Dostoevsky himself answers this question by saying, “I accepted Christ in my life, whom I got to know as a child in my parent’s house and whom I have almost lost, when I in turn became a European liberal.” Putinistit paukuttavat karvaisia käsiään. Keskeytymättömiä aplodeja seisaaltaan.
          ellauri203.html on line 119: Another problem, which could make matters worse, was the intrusion of the socialist (atheist) teaching mentioned above. From his own experience, Dostoevsky knew the danger and destructiveness of this socialist way, offered by many as the way to reform society. In his letter to M. Pogodin, Dostoevsky writes that ‘socialism and Christianity are antonyms’. Christianity and private enterprise are synonyms. The danger of this way, in Dostoevsky’s opinion, was its negation of God and establishment of a new atheistic society.
          ellauri203.html on line 121: By means of his novels, articles, and personal correspondence, Dostoevsky warned about the consequences of entering this dangerous path. The tragedy of Rasskolnikov, the main character of the novel Crime and Punishment, shows how easily one can be infatuated with this teaching of “violence for the sake of love.” Violence is only ok for the sake of hate.
          ellauri203.html on line 127: Although reasonably successful during his lifetime, his fame continued to grow after his death and he inspired not just other later writers, such as Ernest Hemingway, but also sparked a philosophical movement, Existentialism, and influenced the work of Sigmund Freud.
          ellauri203.html on line 129: The insights into the human condition in all its complexity and contradiction contained in his work sprang from his own constant struggle to balance the rational and emotional.
          ellauri203.html on line 131: Dostoevsky was a brilliant mind but plagued by his own demons. Married twice, he also had multiple lovers. In addition, for a great portion of his life he was a gambling addict, regularly losing everything he owned and jeopardizing his family thanks to his passion for roulette. His women say he was a nasty customer.
          ellauri203.html on line 135: Fyodor Michailovich had such type of personality that everyone enjoyed. He was robbed unmercifully, though due to his kindness and trust, but he wouldn’t want to get into details or rebuke servants that used his carelessness. Fyodor Mikhailovich was a man of limitless kindness. Dostoevsky was especially interested in children and paid attention to cases of child abuse that he heard about. He followed closely the trials of parents accused of child abuse.
          ellauri203.html on line 137: Towards the end of his life Dostoevsky became a spiritual leader for many people. Dostoevsky lived so sacrificially because his convictions were deeply wounded by Christ’s suffering and resurrection.
          ellauri203.html on line 139: One of Dostoevsky’s early memories is a daily prayer with his nanny before going to bed with her, when he was thirteen years of age. “I put all my eggs in Thine basket, Mother of God, keep them in Thy care”. This prayer Dostoevsky loved so much that it became part of the prayers which he read to children at bed time. Also from his early years Dostoevsky listened to Bible stories. Remembering those years, Fyodor Mikhailovich wrote in 1873, “In our family we knew the Gospel almost from earliest childhood.”
          ellauri203.html on line 150: The two great writers of the 19th century had completely different ideologies. Ivan Turgenev, author of the novel Fathers and Sons, was a convinced Westernizer and a liberal. Fyodor Dostoyevsky was a conservative nationalist. In his novels The Idiot and The Possessed he preached that liberals had corrupted Russia, leading it to ruin, and that Russia should preserve its own way and Orthodox Christianity.
          ellauri203.html on line 152: It’s not surprising that the two authors did not like each other. From his youth Turgenev, a wealthy nobleman, made fun of his lugubrious colleague. In a mocking poem he described Dostoyevsky as a "pimple on the nose of literature." Dostoyevsky didn´t conceal his reciprocal hostility and was indignant that, with all his wealth, Turgenev´s royalties for his publications were four times as high as he was paid.
          ellauri203.html on line 156: Turgenev, in turn, was annoyed by Dostoyevsky´s psychological preoccupations and his manner going deep into the dark depths of the human soul. "What a sour smell and hospital stench" and "psychological nitpicking" were some of the phrases he used to describe Dostoyevsky´s novels. By jove he hit it right on the dot.
          ellauri203.html on line 208: Les premières années du mariage de Maximilien et de Marie sont heureuses et le couple donne le jour à une nombreuse progéniture. Cependant, les relations des deux époux se dégradent à partir de 1845, date à laquelle la grande-duchesse amorce une liaison avec le comte Grigori Alexandrovitch Stroganov. La plupart des historiens considèrent d'ailleurs que Maximilien n'est pas le véritable père des princes Eugène, Serge (ru) et Georges de Leuchtenberg, qui seraient en réalité les fils de Stroganov. De son côté, Maximilien n'est pas non plus un mari modèle: il multiplie, au contraire, les conquêtes féminines et s'adonne au jeu. En réalité, la vie en Russie pèse au prince, qui est humilié de n'y être que le mari de sa femme.
          ellauri203.html on line 213:

          Dosto and his hens


          ellauri203.html on line 215: Fyodor Dostoevsky´s novels mirrored his life: complicated, tense and full of psychological unrest. He was as dedicated to the women that accompanied him on this difficult journey as he was to the novels that he felt compelled to write. Lets explore the great writer’s relationships with his three key hens, Isajeva, Suslova and Snitkina. (There were more, but they were not key.)
          ellauri203.html on line 217: Dostoevsky was the only 19th-century Russian writer to be sentenced to hard labor, spending four years in a Siberian camp. As fortune – or misfortune – would have it, when the exhausted novelist was finally released, he encountered the writer Maria Isaeva. The relationship was complicated from the very outset: when they met, Isaeva was married with a young son, and Dostoevsky was forced to wait until her husband passed away before he could publically offer her his wand.
          ellauri203.html on line 219: However, this belated first love was not as simple as Dostoevsky had hoped. Isaeva began taunting the writer with letters telling him of her intention to marry one or other wealthy official. Although the pair did ultimately marry, their troubles continued, and the two never settled into a harmonious marriage, with Dostoevsky taking on a role more like a friend or brother to Isaeva, rather than a husband. Mark Slonim, an important Russian scholar, writes in his book The Three Loves of Dostoevsky: “He loved her for all these feelings that she excited in him. For everything that he gave her, for everything that was connected with her. And for all the pains from her.”
          ellauri203.html on line 221: The pair were connected by common suffering, rather than fondness, and Dostoevsky was to base the character of Natasha from Humiliated and Insulted (1861) on his first wife. Like Isaeva, Natasha is prone to tormenting her lovers.
          ellauri203.html on line 223: Dostoevsky met the young Appolinaria Suslova during one of his public readings. At 42, he was two decades older than her. She was attractive, alluring and shared his literary taste and physical passion. Despite this, he could not give her everything she wanted; as Dostoevsky was still married, he conducted a secret affair with Suslova, but she took other lovers and left him. She returned two years later, but was not the same inexperienced young woman and refused to marry the great writer.
          ellauri203.html on line 225: Appolinaria Suslova was perhaps the woman who hurt Dostoevsky most. According to Slonim: “He winced while calling her name, he was in communication with her while married; he always depicted her in his novels. Until his death he remembered her caress and slaps in the face. He was devoted to this seductive, cruel, unfaithful and tragic love.”
          ellauri203.html on line 227: Suslova’s impact on Dostoevsky can be felt through all of his novels. We can glimpse her traits in the sacrificial Dunya (Crime and Punishment – 1866), the desperate and passionate Nastassya Filippovna (The Idiot – 1869), the proud and nervous Liza (Demons – 1872). What is more, Polina, the protagonist in The Gambler, was undoubtedly based on Suslova.
          ellauri203.html on line 229: Anna Snitkina, who was 25 years Dostoevsky’s junior, was his stenographer during his work on The Gambler. The process of completing the novel engrossed both of them so much that they could not imagine life without each other, marrying in 1867. This particular novel was where Dostoevsky’s three great loves intersected: Appolinaria Suslova formed the basis for its protagonist, it was written as his first wife, Maria Isaeva, passed away, and stenographed by his future wife, Anna Snitkina.
          ellauri203.html on line 231: To begin with, Dostoevsky only saw practicality in his marriage to Snitkina: he was in need of stability and confidence in the future. As a result, the union began down to head along the same route as his previous relationships. However, the couple’s extended “honeymoon” abroad, which ended up lasting four years, allowed them to escape Russia’s oppressive atmosphere and try to build a family. It began well: Sonya, a little girl, was born a year after their marriage. Tragedy soon struck, however, when Sonya passed away. The pair went on to have three more children, one of whom also died. They were married for 14 years until Dostoevsky’s death, in which time Snitkina experienced a great deal of anguish brought on by Dostoevsky’s difficult character and lifestyle, namely his jealousy and gambling addiction. However, she remained stoically committed to him and did not remarry after his death, when she was just 35.
          ellauri203.html on line 233: Anna Snitkina did not attempt to change Dostoevsky, accepting him warts and all, which made this marriage the happiest and most harmonious in the writer’s turbulent life. That´s the only working way to survive a hopeless narcissist.
          ellauri203.html on line 235: All rights to Dosto and his hens reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
          ellauri203.html on line 242: Writing in the Los Angeles Times, a professor of Slavic languages praised their Dostoevsky translations, stating "the reason they have succeeded so well in bringing Dostoevsky into English is not just that they have made him sound bumpy or unnatural but that they have managed to capture and differentiate the characters' many bumpy and unnatural voices." A literary critic and essayist, wrote in The Sewanee Review that their Dostoevsky translations "have recaptured the rough and vulgar edge of Dostoevsky's style. This tone of the vulgar that Dostoevsky's writings are full of, so morbidly excessively, they have translated into a vernacular equal to his own." But recently, writing in The New York Review of Books in 2016, a critic argued that Pevear and Volokhonsky have established an industry of taking everything they can get their hands on written in Russian and putting it into flat, awkward English. Other translators have voiced similar criticism, both in Russia and in the English-speaking world. A Slavic studies scholar has written in Commentary that Pevear and Volokhonsky take glorious works and reduce them to awkward and unsightly muddles. Criticism has been focused on the excessive literalness of the couple's translations and the perception that they miss the original tone of the authors.
          ellauri203.html on line 246: The demons, then, are ideas, that legion of isms that came to Russia from the West: idealism, rationalism, empiricism, materialism, utilitari anism, positivism, socialism, anarchism, nihilism, and, underlying them all, atheism. To which the Slavophils opposed their notions of the Russian earth, the Russian God, the Russian Christ, the "light from the East," and so on.
          ellauri203.html on line 254: René Noël Théophile Girard [ži'rar] (25. joulukuuta 1923 Avignon, Ranska – 4. marraskuuta 2015 Stanford, Kalifornia, Yhdysvallat) oli ranskalainen historioitsija, kirjallisuudentutkija ja yhteiskuntafilosofi. Hänen tutkimustensa katsotaan joskus edustavan filosofista antropologiaa. Hänen teoksensa käsittelevät antropologiaa, sosiaalipsykologiaa, teologiaa ja kirjallisuutta yhtä lailla kuin filosofiaakin.
          ellauri203.html on line 304: Milosz pöljäpää on ymmärtänyt Ketman termin väärinpäin "the act of paying lip service to Islam while concealing secret opposition". Päinvastoin, Kitmān (lit. "action of covering, dissimulation"), has a more specific meaning of dissimulation of one's islamic religion by silence or omission. This practice is emphasized in Shia Islam whereby adherents are permitted to conceal their religion when under threat of persecution or compulsion.
          ellauri203.html on line 306: Professional Ketman Miloszille on "the reluctant acceptance of Stalinist standards only to allow one to continue to pursue a desired career path. This is based on the idea of having only a single life and therefore using the time to the best of one's ability" or "to pursue artistic or scientific innovation which requires at least tolerating Socialist Realism and other such censorship standards in order to continue one's work." Miloszia ei realismi napannut, sosialistinen tai ei.
          ellauri203.html on line 310: "The bestseller book also created the idea, particularly in the West, that I was a political writer. This was a misunderstanding because my poetry was unknown. I have never been a political writer and I worked hard to destroy this image of myself." Kovasta yrittämisestä huolimatta kukaan ei taida lukea sen runoja. Vitun lällyjä ne ovatkin, täytyy vähän terävöittää suomennoxessa:
          ellauri203.html on line 341: Repeats while he binds his tomatoes: Toistan haukaten viimeisestä tomaatista:
          ellauri203.html on line 365: Esteettinen Ketman, käytäntö paeta sosialistista realismia täyttämällä elämänsä salaa menneiden aikojen taiteella, kirjallisuudella ja musiikilla. Miłosz kirjoittaa: "Näissä olosuhteissa esteettinen Ketmanon kaikki mahdollisuudet levitä. Se ilmaistaan ​​tiedostamattomana outouden kaipuuna, joka kanavoidaan kontrolloituihin huvituksiin, kuten teatteriin, elokuviin ja kansanjuhliin, mutta myös erilaisiin eskapismin muotoihin. Kirjoittajat kaivautuvat muinaisiin teksteihin, kommentoivat ja muokkaavat muinaisia ​​kirjailijoita. He kirjoittavat lastenkirjoja, jotta heidän mielikuvituksensa olisi hieman vapaampi. Monet valitsevat yliopisto-uran, koska kirjallisuudenhistorian tutkimus tarjoaa turvallisen tekosyyn sukeltaa menneisyyteen ja keskustella esteettisesti arvokkaiden teosten kanssa. Entisen proosan ja runouden kääntäjien määrä moninkertaistuu. Taidemaalarit etsivät kiinnostuksilleen lähdettä lastenkirjojen kuvituksista, joissa raikkaiden värien valintaa voidaan perustella vetoamalla lasten naiiviin mielikuvitukseen. Näyttämöpäälliköt,Lope de Vega tai Shakespeare – eli ne heidän näytelmänsä, jotka keskus on hyväksynyt."
          ellauri203.html on line 388: Jerzy Putrament syntyi Minskissä perheeseen, jolla on isänmaalliset perinteet. Hänen äitinsä oli venäläistä syntyperää ja liittyi ortodoksiseen kirkkoon, kuten myös Jerzy. Hänen tarinansa kerrotaan hahmona "Gamma, historian orja" Czesław Miłoszin kirjan The Captive Mind -luvussa.
          ellauri203.html on line 445: Shakespeare could be born again he would have no cause to retract his
          ellauri203.html on line 446: Hamlet, his Lear.
          ellauri203.html on line 457: unchanged wheel.... Again Shakespeare would set Lear repeating his
          ellauri203.html on line 462: tyrant of to-day, who is almost ready to believe in his own virtue, and
          ellauri203.html on line 464: very time when his half-crushed victims try to find comfort in picturing
          ellauri203.html on line 473: It was published first in 1866 in the first episode of the new literary magazine Epoch that was launched by Dostoevsky and his brother Mikhail. As we know Turgenev and Dostoevsky were not the best of friends. Turgenev had sent the story to Dostoevsky when he was in Baden Baden. Dostoevsky, however, was too busy playing roulette and returned the story without having read it. Mikhail told him in a letter that that had been a big mistake, because their magazine was sure to be a success if they could have a new Turgenev in the first episode. Dostoevsky proceeded to write an apologetic letter to Turgenev and managed to secure Phantoms for the magazine.
          ellauri203.html on line 475: From an 1849 letter to Pauline Viardot we know that the inspiration came from a dream that Turgenev had had. In this dream there was a whitish creature claiming to be his brother Anatoli (Turgenev had two brothers: Nikholai and Sergei). They both turned into birds and flew over the ocean. In another letter Turgenev writes that he was looking for a way to connect several landscape sketches that he had written. He combined the flying with the landscapes and came up with a vampire woman to explain the flying.
          ellauri203.html on line 480:

          Tataariaron rumahiset


          ellauri203.html on line 493: Verkhovensky Jr on joku mestarivehkeilijä eli pahis. Stavrogin on aatelinen toisin sanoen hyvis. Se on nähtävästi taas joku Doston alter ego. Vittu miten Dosto on iso narsisti. Plus pedo, kz. sensuroitua lukua Tihonin pakeilla.
          ellauri203.html on line 505: Näytelmä Torquato Tasso (1833) teki Kukolnikista tunnetun kirjailijan. Siitä kohtuuttomasti innostuneena hän kirjoitti useita taiteilijakohtaloita käsitteleviä draamoja, joita ei pidetty onnistuneina. Kukolnikin historialliset tragediat kuten Ruka Vsevyšnego otetšestvo spasla (”Kaikkivaltiaan käsi pelasti isänmaan”, 1834) vastasivat Nikolai I:n käsityksiä ja ne olivat aikanaan varsin suosittuja. Niissä hallitsija ilmentää kansan tahtoa, kun taas aatelisto edustaa itsekkyyttä, joka usein johtaa petokseen. Kukolnik kirjoitti samassa hengessä etupäässä Pietari I:n aikaan sijoittuvia historiallisia kertomuksia, mutta myöhemmissä teoksissaan hän pyrki välttämään yhteiskunnallisia aiheita.
          ellauri203.html on line 515: Kukolnikin historiallisiin kertomuksiin sisältyy Suomi-aiheinen Jegor Ivanovitš Silvanovski, ili zavojevanije Finljandii pri Petre Pervom, joka ilmestyi Friedrich von Derschaun Finski vestnik -lehdessä vuonna 1845. Sen sankari on suomalainen nuorukainen, joka siirtyy suuren Pohjan sodan aikana venäläisten palvelukseen. Kertomus esittää ruotsalaiset suomalaisten riistäjinä ja venäläiset heidän vapauttajinaan. Kukolnikin kertomus on yksi ensimmäisistä suomennetuista venäläisten kirjailijoiden teoksista. Carl Axel Gottlund julkaisi sen Thomas Frimanin käännöksenä Suomi-lehdessään nimellä Eerikki Silvanus eli Suomen valloittaminen Pietäri ensimäisen aikana. Suomessa ilmestyi 1840- ja 1850-luvuilla myös kaksi Kukolnikin kertomusten ruotsinnosta.
          ellauri203.html on line 526: Jossain luvussa Shitov (hyvis Dosto) ottaa erää Stavroginin (pahis Dosto) kanssa Jumalasta ryssistä ja moraalista. Ei siitä tule lasta eikä paskaakaan, pattitilanne.
          ellauri203.html on line 533:

          Tataariaron rumahistien spoileri


          ellauri203.html on line 545: Nenästävetoduelli on seuraavana päivänä, ketään ei tapeta, tuli nahkamuna. Stavro muhinoikin tässä vaiheessa isän hoidon Dashan kaa. Dashkaakin kauhistuttaa Stavron sekoilut. Sillä aikaa toisaalla Pjotr kosiskelee kuvernöörin saxalaista vaimoa. Kuvernöörskän salongista tulee herhiläisten pesä. Sieltä käsin hätyytetään Spigulin rauhaa rakastavia työläisiä ampumaan viattomia omistajia lakkoaseella. Terveydenhoitajille ja opettajille ajetaan parempia palkkoja. Hävytöntä nihilismiä. Kuvernööri ei voi asialle midiä, vaan tulee hulluxi.
          ellauri203.html on line 547: Pjotr käy insinöörin pakeilla, nyt olis aika tehdä se seppuku. Tulkaa lakkotoimistoon iltapäivällä. Se kuzuu Stauronkin, joka on jostain syystä vaihteexi hyvällä tuulella. Paikalla on kaikenlaisia idealisteja, pettyneitä tyyppejä ja valeälykköjä. Valefilosofi Shigaljev koittaa väittää että totalitarismi on historian välttämättömyys. Pjotr paukuttaa pöytään ja kysyy onko kaikki mukana?. Eli lähettekö mukaan assassiineixi vai kerrotteko virkavallalle?
          ellauri203.html on line 589: Oli ihqua kazoo vierestä kun pisamainen saxalainen sakkoliha saa vizaa pylly paljaana. Dostolla aina ruiskahtaa kun se jää kiinni törkeistä noloista puuhista. On ihanaa kun tuntuu pahalta. Narsistista yhden hengen sadomasokismia. Swinburneluokan algolagni ja kaappihomo takuulla, ja kova runkkari kuten sen sielunveli Rusakko. Se ei tahdo syyttää ympäristöä eikä sairautta, koska tuntuu ihanalta olla ize syyllinen. Vaikka takuulla sen huono parta, paskat vanhemmat, rumat vaatteet, isot korvat, pitkä naama ja tyhmä pää selittävät tästä paljonkin.
          ellauri203.html on line 592: Doston mielestä vasta tää luku selvitti Stavro-paran motiivit. Se koitti epätoivoisesti saada tätä lukua kirjaan takaisin, mutta Katkov oli liian kauhistunut. Sigmund Freud sai siitä ainesta kokonaiseen esseeseen.
          ellauri203.html on line 648: Martin, a respected doctor (huoh), his wife Karin, Karin's seventeen year old brother Minus, and widowed father David of Karin and Minus' have convened at the family's summer home on an island off the coast of Sweden to celebrate David's return from the Swiss Alps, where he was substantially completing his latest novel (huoh). The family has long lived a fantasy of they being a loving one, David's extended absences which are the cause of many of the family's problems. Without that parental guidance, Minus is at a confused and vulnerable stage of his life where he is a bundle of repressed emotions, most specifically concerning not feeling loved by his father and concerning the opposite sex (huoh). He is attracted to females as a collective but does not know how to handle blatant female sexuality, especially if it is directed his way. A month earlier Karin was released from a mental institution (huoh). Her doctor has told Martin that the likelihood that she will fully recover from her illness is low, her ultimate fate being that her mental state will disintegrate totally, although she has functioned well since her release. In his love for her, Martin has vowed to himself to see her through whatever she faces. As Karin begins to lose grip on reality, Minus is the one most directly affected, although it does bring out the issues all the men are facing with regard to their interrelationships.
          ellauri203.html on line 652: In a small family island, Karin, her teenage brother Minus and her husband Martin welcome her father David, who is a writer permanently absent traveling around the world. Karin has just left a mental institution and has inherited the incurable insanity from her mother. Minus feels lost and alone, estranged by his selfish and cold father that left Karin and he (sic) behind after the death of his wife. Martin is neglected by Karin and has no sex life with her anymore and spends his time taking care of his wife. When Karin finds the journal of her father hidden in a drawer in his desk, she reads that her degenerative disease is incurable and triggers a breakdown.
          ellauri203.html on line 656: Karin is trying to readjust to life with her family after her release from a mental institution. Her husband Martin is patient with her as she experiences the highs and lows of life. Both she and her younger brother Minus have issues with their father David, who is visiting. Martin is a well-known author who travels frequently and is estranged from his children. He´s about to publish his latest effort and spends much of his time alone, finalizing the manuscript before submitting it t the publishers. After having sex with Minus she realizes she is unable to live in two worlds and must choose between institutionalization and home life.
          ellauri203.html on line 675: After smoking a magical strain of marijuana and falling asleep for 50 years, this adult animated series follows the three Freak Brothers and their sardonic cat as they adjust to life in 2020.
          ellauri203.html on line 677: Phineas falls in love with the girl of his dreams, only to learn she is a robot sex doll.
          ellauri203.html on line 679: The freaks take on cancel culture after Fat Freddy and his cat becomes famous on a viral video.
          ellauri203.html on line 693: Paxu Daily Mailin kriitikko Roger Lewis arvioi Katherine Rundellin kirjaa John Donnesta, jossa Kate sanoo Donnea brittihistorian sexikkäimmäxi runosepoxi. Paxu Daily Mailin kriitikko piti enemmän Keazista, joka oli romanttisempi eikä sexin suhteen yhtä suorasukainen. Keaz hoiteli vaan tuberkuloottista veljeään eikä tainnut kovin usein päästä viivalle. Donne sen sijaan oli koko ajan availemassa kalukukkaroa. Mun täytyy sanoa että pidän selkeästi enemmän Donnesta.
          ellauri204.html on line 106: Mutta kun se laattialle putosi, siinä ei ollutkaan sammakko, vaan kaunis, lempeä-silmäinen kuninkaan-poika. Tästä nyt tuli tytölle hänen isänsä tahdon mukahan rakas kumppani ja puoliso. Tuo prinssi silloin kertoi, että häijy noita-vaimo oli hänen noitunut, ett'ei kukaan muu, kuin ainoastaan hänen nykyinen puolisonsa, olisi saattanut häntä kaivosta pelastaa, ja että he huomenna tulisivat yhdessä lähtemään hänen valtakuntaansa. Sitten he nukkumaan menivät, ja seuraavana aamuna, kun aurinko heidät herätti, saapui sinne vaunut, joita veti kahdeksan valkoista hevosta: kulta-valjahissa hevoset olivat ja niitten oli pää valkoisilla kamelikurjen-sulilla koristettu. Takana seisoi nuoren kuninkaan palvelia, tuo uskollinen Heikki. Tämä rehellinen poika oli, kun hänen herransa muuttui sammakoksi, surrut niin, että hän sydämmensä ympäri panetti kolme rauta-vannetta, jott'ei se surusta ja murheesta särkyisi. Mutta vaunut olivat tulleet nuorta kuningasta noutamaan hänen valtakuntaansa: uskollinen Heikki auttoi molemmat vaunuihin, asettui itse seisomaan taakse ja oli isäntänsä pelastuksesta aivan ihastuksissaan. Kun he kappaleen matkaa olivat kulkeneet, kuuli kuninkaan-poika takanansa rytisevän, ikään-kuin olisi joku särkynyt. Silloin hän kääntyi taakse-päin ja huusi:
          ellauri204.html on line 223: näki sen laskevan kuumaan lähteeseen, ja hän tapasi lähistöllä ihmisiä.
          ellauri204.html on line 251: Ja sinä päivänä Me avaamme helvetin kauhistuttavana näkynä uskottomille.
          ellauri204.html on line 300: Während al-Ḫiḍr, das auf Arabisch „der Grüne“ bedeutet, immer nur als ein laqab-Beiname verstanden wurde, gab und gibt es über den wirklichen Namen al-Chidrs und seine Abstammung sehr unterschiedliche Lehrmeinungen. Im mittelalterlichen Maghreb war die Auffassung verbreitet, dass al-Chidr eigentlich Ahmad hieß. Der ägyptische Gelehrte Ibn Hadschar al-ʿAsqalānī (gest. 1449), der eine eigene Abhandlung über al-Chidr verfasst hat, führt dort insgesamt zehn unterschiedliche Auffassungen zur Frage von al-Chidrs Namen auf. Einige muslimische Gelehrte setzten al-Chidr auch mit verschiedenen alttestamentlichen Gestalten gleich, darunter Melchisedek, Jeremia, Elija und Elischa. Hintergrund für diese Gleichsetzungen bildeten verschiedene christliche und jüdische Erzählstoffe, zu denen al-Chidr in der islamischen Tradition in Verbindung gebracht wurde. Diejenige Lehrmeinung, die im Laufe der Zeit am meisten Verbreitung gefunden hat, besagt, dass al-Chidr über seinen Vater Malkān ein Urenkel des biblischen Eber sei und eigentlich Balyā heiße. Sie wird auch an dem Heiligtum von al-Chidr in Kataragama in Sri Lanka propagiert.
          ellauri204.html on line 306: Erotuxena muista etanamiehistä Mooses on kaxisarvinen. Muistan nähneeni kuvia Moosexen pazaista joissa sillä oli pukinsarvet. Renessanssiajan suurimpiin kuvanveistäjiin kuuluva Michelangelo sai vuonna 1505 Paavi Julius II:lta tilauksen Mooses-patsaasta. Michelangelo teki patsasta pitkään ja hartaasti. Lopullinen versio valmistui vuonna 1545. Ja totta mooses, Moosexella on siinä selvät pirunsarvet!
          ellauri204.html on line 314: "Sarvet johtuvat heprean käännösvirheestä. Kun Hieronymus käänsi 300-luvulla Vulgataa hepreasta, hän kohdassa 2. Moos 34:29 luki virheellisesti sanan "kirkkaus" tilalle "sarvet". Konsonanttikirjoituksessa heprean kielen sanat qaran (loisti) ja qeren (sarvet) ovat lähellä toisiaan. Käännösvirheellä on hyvin merkittävä vaikutushistoria."
          ellauri204.html on line 327: Eeron amerikkalainen vaihtoisä Martin oli löytänyt mytopoeettisesta miesliikkeestä eheyttävän henkisen kodin ja vastapainon kuolettavalle ikävystymiselle. Mytopoeetikot opettivat kilpailukapitalismin, tieteellisen järjen, toimistobyrokratian ja modernin perhemallin rikkoneen miestenvälisen alkukantaisen veljeyden. Länsimaissa terve sankarienpalvonta oli korvautunut sankarien pilkkaamisen dekadentilla nautinnolla, koko sankaruus oli kyseenalaistettu, tilalle hyväksytty banaalius ja keskinkertaisuus. Miehiset hyveet oli virvoitettava henkiin myyttisellä tarinankerronnalla, rituaaleilla ja symbolisella sodankäynnillä. Miesten ei pitänyt pelätä toisiaan eikä primitiivistä takapuoltaan, vaan uskaltautua syvämiehuuteen yhteisyyden, luottamuksen ja luovan leikin avulla. Siitä kumpusi Zeus-voimaa. Hän otti Eeron mukaan muutamille melko huvittavillekin viikonloppuleireille - eräällä leirillä miehet konttasivat yössä tuhansia vuosia vanhoista juurakoista kasvavien amerikanhaapojen alla ja ulvoivat ja murisivat toteemieläintensä äänin -, ja vaikkei Eero ottanut tosissaan puoliakaan Martinin puheista, hän oli varma, että hänkin voisi kaupallisesti hyödyntää toteemipaaluaan ja pimeätä puoltaan.
          ellauri204.html on line 337: With regards to Iron John, Bly had been giving talks on mythology to supplement his meagre income, and found that when he told this Grimm Brothers tale, originally Iron Hans, it resonated with men. In these early seminars, he asked men to re-enact a scene from The Odyssey, in which Odysseus is instructed to "lift his sword" as he approaches the symbol of matriarchal energy, Circe, to compel her to restore his men from slugs to manly form.
          ellauri204.html on line 340: In The Odyssey, Odysseus and his crew land on Aeaea, and a team of scouts discover the palace of Circe, a witch goddess. Circe invites Odysseus’s men inside for a drink and then magically turns them into pigs. One man escapes to tell Odysseus about their comrades’ fate and Circe’s trickery. Odysseus bravely hopes to rescue his men from Circe’s enchantment; on the way to her house, Odysseus receives help from Hermes, who offers him a plan and equips him with moly, a magical herb that will protect him from Circe’s witchcraft. The plan works: the moly counters Circe’s magic, she swoons for Odysseus and transforms his crew from pigs back into men. Odysseus and Circe then make love. For a year. Finally, some of Odysseus’s crew shake him from the madness of his long Circean interlude and compel him to resume the journey home to Ithaca.
          ellauri204.html on line 342: “So saying, Argeiphontes gave me the herb, drawing it from the ground, and showed me its nature. At the root it was black, but its flower was like milk. [305] Moly the gods call it, and it is hard for mortal men to dig; but with the gods all things are possible. Hermes then departed to high Olympus through the wooded isle, and I went my way to the house of Circe, and many things did my heart darkly ponder as I went. [310] So I stood at the gates of the fair-tressed goddess. There I stood and called, and the goddess heard my voice. Straightway then she came forth, and opened the bright doors, and bade me in; and I went with her, my heart sore troubled. She brought me in and made me sit on a silver-studded chair, [315] a beautiful chair, richly wrought, and beneath was a foot-stool for the feet. And she prepared me a potion in a golden cup, that I might drink, and put therein a drug, with evil purpose in her heart. But when she had given it me, and I had drunk it off, yet was not bewitched, she smote me with her wand, and spoke, and addressed me: [320] ‘Begone now to the sty, and lie with the rest of thy comrades.’ “So she spoke, but I, drawing my sharp sword from between my thighs, rushed upon Circe, as though I would slay her. But she, with a loud cry, ran beneath, and clasped my knees, and with wailing she spoke to me winged words: [325] “‘Who art thou among men, and from whence? Where is thy city, and where thy parents? Amazement holds me that thou hast drunk this charm and wast in no wise bewitched. For no man else soever hath withstood this charm, when once he has drunk it, and it has passed the barrier of his teeth. Nay, but the mind in thy breast is one not to be beguiled. [330] Surely thou art Odysseus, the man of ready device, who Argeiphontes of the golden wand ever said to me would come hither on his way home from Troy with his swift, black ship. Nay, come, put up thy sword in this here sheath, and let us two then go up into my bed, that couched together [335] in love we may put trust in each other.’ “So she spoke, but I answered her, and said:‘Circe, how canst thou bid me be gentle to thee, who hast turned my comrades into swine in thy halls, and now keepest me here, and with guileful purpose biddest me [340] go to thy chamber, and go up into thy bed, that when thou hast me stripped thou mayest render me a weakling and unmanned? Nay, verily, it is not I that shall be fain to go up into thy bed, unless thou, goddess, wilt consent to swear a mighty oath that thou wilt not plot against me any fresh mischief to my hurt.’
          ellauri204.html on line 344: If you thought that a visit to the brothel district was going to be fun and sexy, the “Circe” episode’s opening stage directions quickly dispel you of that notion by establishing the unseemly setting of Joyce’s Nighttown. The tracks are “skeleton,” the signals warn of “danger,” the houses are “grimy,” the men are “stunted,” and the women “squabble” about price. Indeed, Encyclopaedia Britannica in 1885 labeled this part of Dublin “the worst slum in Europe”. Located in east Dublin between Montgomery Street and Tyrone (né Mecklenburgh) Street, Nighttown is an ugly place filled with unsavory people. Moly (ei Molly) yrtti oli luultavasti valkosipuli. Bloomin mielixeen kengittämän hoidon hampaat haisi valkosipulilta.
          ellauri204.html on line 346: So much for Circe. Back to Bly. He found many men were unable to carry this out, so fixed were they on the idea of not hurting anyone. These were men who had come of age during the Vietnam war, and they wanted nothing to do with a manhood which seemed to require erection.
          ellauri204.html on line 348: Bly recognised that these men were also distinguished by their unhappiness, which he asserted was caused by this passivity. He aimed to teach these men that simply "flashing the sword" was by no means an act of war, but showed what he called ‘a joyful decisiveness’, a sense of vivid aliveness. It was more like flashing their wieners.
          ellauri204.html on line 358: Such a potential often comes at a time of cultural chaos, and we are focussed on the new wave of the mythopoetic – one which considers gender diversity and inclusivity, soul ecology and a story beyond the ‘hero myth’ to which our culture has become so rigidly affixed. This allows for the ancient and deeper archetypes such as the ecologically-focussed Antihero, Green Man and the Shaman-Trickster to arise, offering a less rigid :D , more nuanced and yet expansive approach to whole humanhood.
          ellauri204.html on line 369: Rübezahl on kansanperinteinen vuoristohenki Giant Mountainsissa (Riesengebirge), vuorijono Böömin ja Sleesian historiallisten alueiden välisellä rajalla. Hän on monien legendojen ja satujen aihe saksaksi, puolaksi ja tšekiksi.
          ellauri204.html on line 390: After recycling these hundreds of elements from elsewhere in Ulysses as he composed “Circe,” Joyce expanded his understanding of this novel’s potential as “a kind of encyclopedia” (Selected Letters 271). He began revising the rest of the book accordingly, arranging little snippets of interrelated detail throughout the previous episodes into an intricate network of minor motifs that accumulate and aggregate in the careful reader’s awareness. “Circe” serves as an absurd but cathartic outpouring of Ulysses thus far. Having gotten all that out of our systems, we are ready for the episodes Joyce called the “Nostos,” the return
          ellauri204.html on line 425: Herman Raivio teilasi Rikun finlandiaehdokkaan Suomen Kuivanvetolehdessä 2016. Riku Korhonen kuvaa taas miehistä alennustilaa – mutta todelliset oivallukset puuttuvat. Riku selittää liikaa kun valottaa hahmoja menneisyyden kautta.
          ellauri204.html on line 448: Koska Korhonen kirjoittaa vähän kaikesta, hänen kykynsä pitää tarina koossa on hämmästyttävä. Emme enää usko pahaan käsittelee kaiken muun lisäksi yhtä Riku Korhosen lempiaiheista, miehen halua alistaa naista. Korhonen nälvii vaimojensa nöyryyttämisestä haaveilevia aviomiehiä: ”Kukapa ahtaalle ajettu, verstaassa lymyilevä pikku aviomies ei haaveilisi vaimonsa laittamisesta rautoihin. Se oli historiallisesti johdonmukaista. Koska länsimaiden miehet olivat antaneet naisille heidän nykyisen vapautensa, he saattoivat myös ottaa sen pois.” Vahvaa misogyniaa, noinkin isolta mieheltä.
          ellauri204.html on line 450: Romaanissa kuvattujen ihmisten historian taju on niin vääristynyttä, ettei se voi olla johtamatta pahaan. Näin on siitä huolimatta, että Eero yrittää parhaansa mukaan selittää hänessä tapahtunutta henkistä muutosta: ”Väkivaltafantasioissa ei piillyt mitään syvää merkitystä. Ne ilmensivät vain darwinistista olioiden mittelyä erotiikan symbolialueelle siirrettynä. Vahvempi sieppasi hiehomman ja todisti geneettisen laatunsa ja rohkeutensa ja panosti antautumaan.” (s. 223)
          ellauri204.html on line 549: Yllättäen pieni Ukraina on siis voittanut. Euroviisut, siinä hyvä nimi Ukrainan selkkauxelle tuleviin historian kirjoihin.
          ellauri204.html on line 562: Uudet ideat ovat vähissä ja arvostelun kohteet eläkkeellä Eskelisen esseekokoelmassa, tuomizee emperorin hanslankari Vesa Rantama jo ingressissä.
          ellauri204.html on line 574: Fredric Jameson (born April 14, 1934) is an American literary critic, philosopher and Marxist political theorist. He is best known for his analysis of contemporary cultural trends, particularly his analysis of postmodernity and capitalism. Jameson's best-known books include Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (1991) and The Political Unconscious.
          ellauri204.html on line 576: He returned 1955 to America after a year in Europe to pursue a doctoral degree at Yale University, where he studied under Erich Auerbach. Auerbach would prove to be a lasting influence on Jameson's thought. This was already apparent in Jameson's doctoral dissertation, published in 1961 as Sartre: the Origins of a Style. Auerbach's concerns were rooted in the German philological tradition; his works on the history of style analyzed literary form within social history. Jameson would follow in these steps, examining the articulation of poetry, history, philology, and philosophy in the works of nauseous Jean-Paul Sartre.
          ellauri204.html on line 580: WW2 squirted a nasty influx of commie refugees to America, whose whipping into order took decades of post war policing. On this effort, Jameson acted as a recalcitrant 5th column.
          ellauri204.html on line 584: Douze points to Jameson for showing middle finger to postmodernism. Sehän on selvää sumutusta, kapitalismin siirtomaatavarakaupan savuverhoa. In his view, postmodernity's merging of all discourse into an undifferentiated whole was the result of the colonization of the cultural sphere, which had retained at least partial autonomy during the prior modernist era, by a newly organized corporate capitalism. Nimenomaan niin!
          ellauri204.html on line 611: Yhtenä oivana väylänä tavoitteisiinsa kriitikkokillan puheenjohtajana Rantama pitää Alushame näkyy! -hanketta. Koneen Säätiön myöntämä 350.000 euron apuraha on kaikkien aikojen suurin liiton historiassa.
          ellauri204.html on line 633: Lord of the Flies is a 1954 novel by Nobel Prize-winning English author William Golding. The book’s premise focuses on a group of British boys stranded on an uninhabited island and their attempt to govern themselves, with disastrous results. Golding wrote his book as a counterpoint to R.M. Ballantyne’s youth novel The Coral Island, and included specific references to it, such as the rescuing naval officer’s description of the children’s pursuit of Ralph as “a jolly good show, like the Coral Island”.
          ellauri204.html on line 635: Hyvän historia – Ihmiskunta uudessa valossa (2020) (holl. De meeste mensen deugen) on Rutger Bregmanin menestynyt tietokirja, joka argumentoi pessimististä ja kyynistä ihmiskuvaa vastaan. Onkohan suomentaja Mari Janatuinen sukua Juha "Watt" Vainion lyriikoiden Janatuiselle?
          ellauri204.html on line 676:
          Pahis

          ellauri204.html on line 704: Antoine Marie Joseph Paul Artaud, better known as Antonin Artaud, was a French writer, poet, dramatist, visual artist, essayist, actor and theatre director. He is widely recognized as one of the major figures of the European avant-garde. In particular, he had a profound influence on twentieth-century theatre through his conceptualization of the Theatre of Cruelty. Known for his raw, surreal and transgressive work, his texts explored themes from the cosmologies of ancient cultures, philosophy, the occult, mysticism and indigenous Mexican practices. Hirveää scheissea.
          ellauri204.html on line 708: This time
          ellauri204.html on line 757: Contre le monde, contre la vie on H. P. Lovecraftia käsittelevä teos. Se sisältää Stephen Kingin esipuheen, Houellebecqin pitkän esseen Lovecraftin teoksista ja elämästä ja kaksi Lovecraftin pitkää novellia, "The Call of Cthulhu" ('Cthulhun kutsu') ja "The Whisperer of Darkness" (Kuiskaus pimeässä) ranskaksi käännettyinä.
          ellauri204.html on line 763: Alain Finkielkraut (s. 30. kesäkuuta 1949 Pariisi, Ranska) on ranskalainen essealainen. Hän on Auschwitzista pelastuneen puolanjuutalaisen taidekäsityöläisen poika. Hän opettaa École polytechnique -nimisessä teknillisessä eliittikorkeakoulussa aatehistorian professorina humanististen ja yhteiskuntatieteiden tiedekunnassa. Useita teoksia kirjoittanut Finkielkraut esiintyy säännöllisesti television talk show -ohjelmissa ja kirjoittaa kolumneja ranskalaisiin lehtiin usein humanistisesta näkökulmasta. Finkielkraut on tunnettu erityisesti islamin arvostelijana. Michel ja Alain kuulostavat totaalisen perseiltä!
          ellauri204.html on line 767: Eero, vähän epävakaa paintball-yrittäjä, ottaa vaimon päiväunelmoinnin tosissaan. Miehisyys pitää todistaa. Romantiikkakin palaisi. Mukaan Eero pyytää parasta kaveriaan Laria, joka on juuri jätetty aneemisuuden takia. Kuten arvata saattaa, ihailee hintelä mies raakaa voimaa. Naisenryöstö antaisi syyn toimintaan.
          ellauri205.html on line 51: Eurooppaa pidetään useimmissa historiallisissa lähteissä Tyron kuninkaan Agenorin kauniina tyttärenä (vrt. Iisebel); äitinsä nimi on yleensä Telia tai Elisa. Isänsä kautta Eurooppa on Poseidonin tyttärentytär ja myös nymfi Io:n jälkeläinen. Sources differ in details regarding Europa's family, but agree that she is Phoenician, and from an Argive lineage that ultimately descended from the princess Io, the mythical nymph beloved of Putin, who was transformed into a heifer.
          ellauri205.html on line 94: Densat, nistit ja sekakäyttäjät rakentaa omaiskärsijöistä loistottomia ihmissäryn torneja. Ei mitään Huismannin taivastoivon loistotorneja. Tippuvat vesipisarat pitäis poistaa taide-elokuvista. Ja tuulessa heiluvat puut ja kiven alla kihisevät ötökät. Olen erittäinkin samaa mieltä. Taide-elokuvat on hanurista.
          ellauri205.html on line 118: 'Bout the way his river flows
          ellauri205.html on line 140: 'Bout the way his river flows
          ellauri205.html on line 152:

          Miesvaltafantasioista nauttivat naiset olivat itsevarmempia, tasapainoisempia ja paremmassa sopusoinnussa seksuaalisuutensa kanssa kuin ne, jotka torjuivat sellaiset likaiset järjettömyydet. Hän luki psykoanalyyttisia tulkintoja latenssi-ikäisilla tytöillä yleisistä sieppausfantasioista, joiden avulla he analyytikkojen mukaan käsittelivät miehisen perversion herättämiä pelkoja ja isään kohdistuvia tiedostamattomia libidinaalisia toiveita.
          ellauri205.html on line 154: Hän tutustui filosofien teorioihin valtafantasioista vapauttavina rajanrikkomisina, miehisenä kapitalistisena esineistämisenä tai yhteiskunnallisen sorron heijastumina tietoisuudessa. Hän luki filosofi Simone Weilin "riipaisevan" tekstin Helenan ryöstöstä alkaneesta Troijan sodasta ja Ilias-eepoksesta väkivaltarunoelmana, jossa kuvattiin, miten väkivalta muutti ihmiset esineen kaltaisiksi, vei heiltä tulevaisuuden, sisäisen elämän, toimintakyvyn ja yhteyden toisiin. Yhteisöön levitessään väkivalta karkasi ihmisten hallinnasta. Siitä tuli kohtalon ja oikullisten jumalten kaltainen voima, oman olemassaolonsa mytologinen perustelu. Perverssillä tavalla väkivalta liitti mitättömän värikuula-aseilla hääräilevän pösilön historian valtavirtaan ja suureen runouteen.
          ellauri205.html on line 176: C'est cette notion grecque peut-être qui subsiste, sous le nom de kharma [sic], dans les pays d'Orient imprégnés de bouddhisme; mais l'Occident l'a perdue et n’a plus même dans aucune de ses langues de mot pour l’exprimer; les idées de limite, de mesure, d'équilibre, qui devraient déterminer la conduite de la vie, n'ont plus qu'un emploi servile dans la technique. Nous ne sommes géomètres que devant la matière ! Les Grecs furent d'abord géomètres dans l'apprentissage de la vertu.
          ellauri206.html on line 63: The concept is often attributed to Russian playwright Anton Chekhov, reputed to have said "Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass." What Chekhov actually said, in a letter to his brother, was "In descriptions of Nature one must seize on small details, grouping them so that when the reader closes his eyes he gets a picture. For instance, you’ll have a moonlit night if you write that on the mill dam a piece of glass from a broken bottle glittered like a bright little star, and that the black shadow of a dog or a wolf rolled past like a ball."
          ellauri206.html on line 77: In Book III of his repulsive Republic (c. 373 BC), Plato examines the "style" of "poetry" (the term includes comedy, tragedy, epic and lyric poetry): All types narrate events, he argues, but by differing means. He distinguishes between narration or report (diegesis) and imitation or representation (mimesis). Tragedy and comedy, he goes on to explain, are wholly imitative types; the dithyramb is wholly narrative; and their combination is found in epic poetry. When reporting or narrating, "the poet is speaking in his own person; he never leads us to suppose that he is any one else"; when imitating, the poet produces an "assimilation of himself to another, either by the use of voice or gesture". In dramatic texts, the poet never speaks directly; in narrative texts, the poet speaks as him or herself.
          ellauri206.html on line 79: In his Poetics, the unknown Greek philosopher Aristotle argues that kinds of "poetry" (the term includes drama, flute music, and lyre music for Aristotle) may be differentiated in three ways: according to their medium, according to their objects, and according to their mode or "manner" (section I); "For the medium being the same, and the objects the same, the poet may imitate by narration—in which case he can either take another personality as Homer does, or speak in his own person, unchanged—or he may present all his characters as living and moving before us" (section III).
          ellauri206.html on line 88: As a result, poorer countries are experiencing their slowest growth in a generation, while middle-income nations are denied debt relief despite surging poverty levels. Most of the world’s poor are women and girls, who are paying a high price in lost healthcare, education and jobs. WTF Gutierres, don't you notice what 4 letter turd you just dropped from your upper sphincter? Grow!? Is this a time for the monkey plague to grow, do you think?
          ellauri206.html on line 95: Sleazy Capital News (Hufvudstadsbladet) in its optimistically titled two-column report "This is how we avoid global warming" left out 2/5 of Gutierres energy recommendations. Only increases in investmets got a mention. What was left out? Well these:
          ellauri206.html on line 100: Furthermore, wealthier countries must finally make good on their promise to provide $100 billion in climate finance to developing countries, starting this year.
          ellauri206.html on line 116: But who wants to give a handout to a man who badmouths his donors so brashly? Schucks, let him rant, the best-selling brand today is fear.
          ellauri206.html on line 149: his-home-in-2003-which-killed-13-members-of-his-family-leaving-him-an-orphan-subsequently-he-became-a-british-citizen-in-2010-the-iraq-war-began-10-years-ago-this-week-photograph-taken-on-march-17-2013-reuterspaul-hackett-britain-tags-military-politics-society-sport-soccer-conflict-2E6A949.jpg" />
          ellauri206.html on line 184: Contre le monde, contre la vie on H. P. Lovecraftia käsittelevä teos. Se sisältää Stephen Kingin (yäk) esipuheen, Houellebecqin pitkän esseen Lovecraftin teoksista ja elämästä ja kaksi Lovecraftin pitkää novellia, "The Call of Cthulhu" ('Cthulhun kutsu') ja "The Whisperer of Darkness" (Kuiskaus pimeässä) ranskaksi käännettyinä. Tästä häiskästä on joku aikaisempi paasaus albumissa 204, jossa ruoditaan Rikun jouzenlaulua. Se näyttää piipunrassilta. Siis Thomas. Tai no molemmat. Sitä on syystä sanottu islamofobiseksi, rasistiseksi ja seksistiseksi ja väitetty sen myötäilevän äärioikeistoa. Oikeus nautintoon (Plateforme, 2001. Suomentanut Ville Keynäs) on täyttä millenniaaliroskaa sekin. Jokaisella ihmisellä on oikeus turvalliseen ja nautinnolliseen seksuaalisuuteen. On tärkeää siis tutkiskella itseään ja opetella tunnistamaan jutut, mitkä tuntuvat itsestä nautinnollisilta. Omaan kehoon kannattaa tutustua rauhassa ja selvittää millainen kosketus tuntuu itsestä nautinnolliselta. Myös vammaisilla on oikeus nautintoon, tunnevammaisilla varsinkin.
          ellauri206.html on line 211: Riku ei pysty aikuistumaan edes kirveellä. Siitä on noloa olla eno, se on kuin pukeutuisi porokuvioiseen neuletakkiin. When the Prophet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam (may Allah exalt his mention) was asked: “Which sin is the greatest?” He sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam (may Allah exalt his mention) said: “To set up rivals for Allah, your Creator.” It is said: ‘Thereafter?’ He sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam (may Allah exalt his mention) answered: “To kill your children for fear of eating with you (i.e. fear of want). It is said: ‘Then, which is next?’ The Prophet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam (may Allah exalt his mention) said: “To have sex with your neighbor's wife.”
          ellauri206.html on line 213: Pasifistiksi kääntynyt 88-vuotias herra Kaneko kertoi Dawesille nuorena sotilaana tekemistään murhista, kidutuksista, raiskauksista ja lasten tappamisesta. Hän oli lähtenyt Kiinan rintamalle kunniasta unelmoiden. Japanilaissotilaat oli opetettu lausumaan kuoleman hetkellä kunniansa julki: ”Eläköön hänen majesteettinsa keisari!” Mutta kun Kaneko-sanin toverit kuolivat taisteluissa, kukaan ei ylistänyt keisaria: ”Kaikki huusivat äitii, äitii! Kaikki sanoivat niin. Ja se oli loppu.”
          ellauri206.html on line 231: Suvin pikahöyläyxen jälkeen Riku makaa rähmällään laiturilla farkut nilkoissa kuin koirassammakko kutupuuhissa. Tässä kirjassa on tosi paljon tuloxetonta panoa. Niistä lie muodostunut Rikun koko elämä.
          ellauri206.html on line 233: Rikun kirjat on monologeja vaikka puhujia olisi useampia. Se vähä dialogi mikä niissä on ei vaikuta aidolta. Eikä henkilöt. Ne ei elä omaa elämäänsä vaan paasaavat kynäilijän ajatuxia. Henkilöt ja toimijat: Riku, Rikun pippeli, Rikun pussukat. Vielä kerran pojat! Humaltunut shiazupissis Laila nosti hametta. Sieltä pörhisteli tussu tuuhea kuin rusettimarsu tekemässä pesää herkkuhaarukkaan.
          ellauri206.html on line 252: IL fréquente le salon de Charles Buet, où il rencontre Jules Barbey d'Aurevilly, Joris-Karl Huysmans, François Coppée, Léon Bloy, Laurent Tailhade et autres cretins. Il rencontre Edmond de Goncourt, avec qui il restera lié jusqu'à la mort de ce dernier en 1896, et qui fut son principal protecteur. Edmond de Goncourt, dans la récente édition complète en 22 volumes du Journal des Goncourt, se montre curieux de toutes les questions sexuelles et particulièrement de l'homophilie. À partir de 1884, Edmond de Goncourt, jusque-là banalement réactionnaire, devient un antisémite enragé, Jésus l'a sauvé après 27 années d'homosexualité. Il se veut esthète et dandy en même temps qu'explorateur tapageux du vice et de la vulgarité, curieux assemblage qui verse souvent dans le pire mauvais goût, et qui lui vaut le mépris hautain de Robert de Montesquiou, dont Lorrain, pour sa part, fait volontiers sa tête de Turc pour sa prétention à l'élégance et à la chasteté. « Lorrain », écrit Léon Daudet dans ses Souvenirs, « avait une tête poupine et large à la fois de coiffeur vicieux, les cheveux partagés par une raie parfumée au patchouli, des yeux globuleux, ébahis et avides, de grosses lèvres qui jutaient, giclaient et coulaient pendant son discours. Son torse était bombé comme le bréchet de certains oiseaux charognards. Lui se nourrissait avidement de toutes les calomnies et immondices. »
          ellauri206.html on line 279: En 1844, Théophile Gautier fonde le club des Hashischins avec Jacques-Joseph Moreau, club voué à l'étude du cannabis. Ce club sera fréquenté par de nombreux artistes de l'époque, dont Charles Baudelaire. Teophilen haudalla on muusia, nim. Kalliopee.
          ellauri206.html on line 292: Today, I’m going to present you a rather complicated French poem, which speaks of French historical characters and refers to legends from France and the Roman and Greek antiquity.
          ellauri206.html on line 294: Rather dark, yet full of hope, this poem is gorgeous and profound, and one can find a new meaning with each reading.
          ellauri206.html on line 371: Toinen pikakelaus eikä aikaakaan niin voi kauhistus: Helmi on jo maisteri! Niin se aika pakenee, eheu fugaces labuntur anni, kuten leukavasti laukaisi Horatius, se lerppana.
          ellauri206.html on line 393: teologia, kirkon historia, pyhyys, Pyhä
          ellauri206.html on line 439: Tämä on yksi tärkeimmistä jumalallisen ulostulon hetkistä kirkon historiassa. Kun Augustinus kuuli sen, hän ei enää muistellut etiopialaista eunukkia, joka oli kerran ottanut hänet käteensä ja tullut Jesajan kirjakääröön. Sen sijaan Augustinus muisti toisen kuuluisan kristityn Afrikasta, joka tunnetaan nimellä Pyhä Antonius autiomaasta, se jolla oli näitä aika eroottisia näkyjä. Pyhää Anttonia pidetään laajalti luostaruuden isänä, ja koppihartautta jouhipaita päällä piiska kädessä akuankkahousuissa arvostettiin suuresti 400-luvulta nykypäivään. Pyhä Antonius kuoli Augustinuksen ollessa vain kaksivuotias, mutta algerialaisena Augustinus kunnioitti aavikkoisiä, joista Antonius oli ensimmäinen. Tuolla hekumallisella hetkellä puutarhassa Augustinus muisti sen ajan, jolloin Antonius oli käynyt läpi oman tuskallisen tuskansa ja avannut Raamatun kriisihetkellä. Hän oli törmännyt tuohon peukalovärssyyn, jossa sanottiin, mitä hänen piti kuulla: "Mene, myy omaisuutesi ja anna köyhille . . . seuraa minua” (Matt. 19:21). Antonius oli lähtenyt ulos, ja yksi kirkon historian suurista luvuista alkoi, luostariliikkeen alku, joka kokosi uskovia yhteisen elämänsäännön alle. Tunnetuin elämänsääntö tunnetaan nimellä Pyhän Benedictuksen sääntö, joka jatkuu monissa luostarikunnissa nykypäivään asti.
          ellauri206.html on line 495: Pettynyt käyttäjä Suomi 24 palstalla: Liityin Valoon ja totesin ensimmäisen päivän jälkeen, että kylläpä on pinnallinen paikka. Suurimmalla osalla miehistä oli vain kuvia, ei mitään tekstiä.
          ellauri206.html on line 518: Työttömän työnhakijan pääasiallinen tehtävä on työnhaku. Ja uusi työnhaun malli korostaa sitä. ”Tavoitteena on nopea työllistyminen”, sanoo TE-toimiston johtaja. Ja tässä hän aivan oikeassa, koska työttömyysedun saadakseen työttömän on suoritettava velvollisuutensa. Työttömän on haettava neljää työmahdollisuutta kuukaudessa välttääkseen karenssin. Työnantajat toivovat, ettei yhteenottoja tulisi. ”Ei puhettakaan turhista hakemuksista ja hakemusten tulvasta.” "Kun työn kysyntä kasvaa palkat laskevat", laskeskelevat työnantajat.
          ellauri207.html on line 74: Outcast, mute, a lone twin cut from a drunk mother in a shack full of junk, Euchrid Eucrow of Ukulore inhabits a nightmarish Southern valley of preachers and prophets, incest and ignorance. When the God-fearing folk of the town declare a foundling child to be chosen by the almighty, Euchrid is disturbed. He sees her very differently, and his conviction, and increasing isolation and insanity, may have terrible consequences for them both…
          ellauri207.html on line 89: Like no work since the Arithmetica of Diophantus two millennia before, L. C. Parnault’s Dimensions in Mathematics presents the fullness of mathematical knowledge attained by man. From Thales to Turing, Pythagoras to Euclid, Archimedes to Newton, the Riemann Hypothesis to Fermat’s Last Theorem, Parnault escorts both serious mathematicians and the non-mathematical mind through the deepest mysteries of mathematics. Along the way he offers the greatest expositions yet of number theory, combinatorial topology, the analytics of complexity, and his own groundbreaking work on spherical astronomy. Dimensions equips even elementary readers with the tools to solve the logical puzzles of the perfect universe that can exist only in the mind of a mathematician.
          ellauri207.html on line 91: “Dr. Parnault’s elegant explications of seemingly every extant mathematical concept or quandary make this text as indispensible as any in our field,” says Fields Medal-winning MIT Professor Gerald Lambeau. “His presentation of combinatorial mathematics left me breathless.”
          ellauri207.html on line 97: UPDATE: Just April Foolin’. Parnault and his book remain but fiction.
          ellauri207.html on line 174: Michael Douglas, son of Kirk Douglas, was accused of masturbating in front of an employee. To the claim that he masturbated in front of her, Douglas said, "This is a complete lie, fabrication, no truth to it whatsoever." He will again reprise his role in the upcoming film Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023).
          ellauri207.html on line 176: Douglas was not raised with a religious affiliation, but stated in January 2015, that he now identifies as a Reform Jew. Douglas strongly supports the #MeToo movement.In June 2013, Douglas told The Guardian that his type of lip cancer is caused by the human papilloma virus transmitted by cunnilingus.
          ellauri207.html on line 182: Catherine Zeta-Jones was born on 25 September 1969 in Swansea, Wales, to David Jones, the owner of a sweet factory, and his wife Patricia (née Fair), a seamstress. Her father is Welsh and her mother is of Irish Catholic descent. She was named after her grandmother, Zeta Jones (whose name was derived from the name of a ship that her great-grandfather once sailed on), because 'Just Jones' would not cut the cheese in showbiz. Zeta-Jones was raised in the suburban area of Mumbles.Her struggle with depression and bipolar II disorder has been well documented by the media, for she is married to sex addicted actor Michael Douglas, son of Kirk, whose name used to be Issur Danielovitch Demsky. Michael is 25 years her senior but a wizard with cunnilingus.
          ellauri207.html on line 194: Mikaelin celeb status oli toki lisännyt mielenkiintoa naisten joukossa tavalla, joka Mikaelista oli sekä omituinen että käsittämätön. Yllättävintä oli, että nuoretkin naiset saattoivat tyrkyttää itseään varsin odottamattomissa yhteyksissä, kuten hississä ja vessassa.
          ellauri207.html on line 325: President Joe Biden has ordered US flags on federal grounds to be flown at half-staff until sunset on Saturday to honor the victims of this "senseless acts of violence." "That will teach them!" Biden said. "30th shooting at a K-12 school this year," he said proudly. "Try and beat that Putin!"
          ellauri207.html on line 327: Turning the sad incident unfairly into an issue of gun control legislation, Biden implored law enforcement officers to "turn this pain in the ass into pump action" as he ticked through some of the mass shootings since the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, when he was vice president.
          ellauri207.html on line 351: Oh, come off it. That surly cunt of yours is squirming like a snake. Zalachenko about Lisbeth Salander, his own daughter. He was portrayed by Georgi Staykov. Sanokaas, onko tällänen sievää puhetta? Kysyn taas: mix niin monet tykkää just tälläsestä? Koska ne on apinoita.
          ellauri207.html on line 355: Born in Stalingrad in 1940, Zalachenko was orphaned when he was a year old when his parents died in the Second World War. He grew up in the Russian military. When he defecated to Sweden he changed his name to Karl Axel Bodin. It is said that Sweden was his country of choice because there are few Jews in Sweden. Why? There are fewer yet in Finland.
          ellauri207.html on line 357: Zalachenko got involved with Agneta Sjolander, who changed her own name to match his, but he refused to marry her, calling her a whore. Regardless he fathered two children with her, Lisbeth and her twin sister, Camilla. So they must have had their moments... Zalachenko brutally beat and abused Agneta, who tried to shelter her daughters from the brutality, and the two girls reacted differently. Camilla didn´t care at all for her mother, and Lisbeth did. At age twelve, Lisbeth Salander, set Zalanchenko, her father, on fire to stop his brutal beatings of her mother. We find out in The Girl Who Played with Fire, that because of the damage to his body, he had to have his leg amputated and suffers from chronic pain. I can relate to that! Constant pain is enough to turn one into a psychopath. This act is used as evidence to support claims that Lisbeth Salander is mentally ill, and remains a topic of debate for readers and characters.
          ellauri207.html on line 361: Years later, he runs a criminal empire based on drugs and prostitution, with his son Ronald Neiderman as his enforcer. El Sapo continues to cover for him in order to have him as a national asset, meaning that he is never arrested for his crimes but just patted on the back. This part of the story sounds fully believable. Some feminists blamed Mia for spreading bourgeois fantasies. The story did not specify which, and Lisbet hadn´t got the foggiest what they might be. Nor Stieg for that matter.
          ellauri210.html on line 50: William Sydney Porter (September 11, 1862 – June 5, 1910), better known by his pen name O. Henry, was an American short story writer. Amerikkalainen pikkukonna ja pakinoizija joka hyvin amerikkalaisittain yhdisti nämä ammatit, tehden kahta työtä rinnakkain. Sen mielikirja oli Burtonin Anatomy of Melancholy. Nuorena se vietti aikaa Texasissa päästäkseen pahasta yskästä. Yskä parani mutta jano paheni. Se nai kauniin mutta tubisen vaimon vastoin perheen tahtoa. Sen poika kuoli synnytyksessä
          ellauri210.html on line 113: On niin kiehtova kokemus, että joudun perustelemaan teorioitani Mmea kohtaan. Yvette ja Max-setä. Toivon vain, että se olisi mahdollista muuten kuin kirjallisesti, huolimatta huonosta puheestani ja heikentyneestä kuulostani. Ja minulla ei todellakaan ole aikomustakaan antaa periksi sen tunnustuksen lisäksi, että tiedämme niin vähän. Tiedät esimerkiksi, että Charlie Chaplin on ollut viime päivinä Wienissä. Melkein minäkin olisin nähnyt hänet, mutta täällä oli hänelle liian kylmää ja hän lähti taas nopeasti. Hän on epäilemättä suuri taiteilija; varmasti hän esittää aina yhtä ja samaa hahmoa; vain heikko, köyhä, avuton, kömpelö nuori, jolle asiat kuitenkin lopulta menevät hyvin. Luuletko nyt, että tätä roolia varten hänen täytyy unohtaa oma egonsa? Päinvastoin, hän soittaa aina vain itseään, kuten hän oli varhaisessa synkässä nuoruudessaan. Hän ei pääse eroon noista vaikutelmista ja saa tähän päivään asti itselleen korvauksen tuon elämänsä menneen ajanjakson turhautumisesta ja nöyryytyksistä. Hän on niin sanotusti poikkeuksellisen yksinkertainen ja läpinäkyvä tapaus. Ajatus siitä, että taiteilijoiden saavutukset liittyvät läheisesti heidän lapsuusmuistoihinsa, vaikutelmiinsa, sortoa ja pettymyksiä, on jo tuonut meille paljon valistusta ja siitä syystä tullut erittäin suureksi kallisarvoinen meille. Uskalsin kerran lähestyä analyyttisesti yhtä suurimmista, joista tunnemme valitettavasti hyvin vähän: Leonardo da Vinciä. Pystyin ainakin tekemään todennäköiseksi, että Pyhä Anna, Neitsyt ja lapsi, jossa voit vierailla Louvrea ei voida täysin ymmärtää (ymmärrettävä) ilman merkittävää lapsuuden historiaa Leonardo. Eikä voisi, ehkä paljon muutakaan.
          ellauri210.html on line 123: Moreover, Freud (1960) followed Herbert Spencer's ideas of energy being conserved, bottled up, and then released like so much steam venting to avoid an explosion. Sixi porukat raivon sijasta joskus räjähtävät nauramaan. Freud was imagining psychic or emotional energy, and this idea is now thought of as the relief theory of laughter. Lisää aiheesta albumissa 30.
          ellauri210.html on line 212: Roussel oli omana elinaikanaan marginaalinen kirjailija, eivätkä läheskään kaikki kirjallisuudenhistoriat mainitse hänen nimeään. Sen sijaan surrealistit arvostivat häntä. Michel Foucault kirjoitti ensimmäisen kirjansa Rousselista. OuLiPo-ryhmä, Nouveau Roman –kirjailijat ja Tel Quelin jäsenet sen sijaan ovat jatkaneet Rousselin viitoittamalla päättömyyxien tiellä.
          ellauri210.html on line 334:

        • Picasso did his own iconic striped shirt. No it was Coco Chanel.
          ellauri210.html on line 337: Picasso predicted he'd be known more for his poetry than his paintings. He was wrong.
          ellauri210.html on line 361: Arthur Cravan, the Dadaist poet-boxer, was neither a good poet nor a good boxer, but he was a legendary provocateur. Hemingway, Mailer, and Scorsese: much great American art has been inspired by boxing. How bout Irving? No he was a wrestler. Between 1907 and 1909, Saul Bellow created three paintings—Club Night, Stag at Sharkey’s, Both Members of This Club—that captured boxing’s glories and indignities. The sport provided a powerfully visceral metaphor for the American experience of the twentieth century. Amerikan nyrkki on sittemmin kumauttanut päähän useampia kansoja kuin kehtaa muistella.
          ellauri210.html on line 365: One of them was the Swiss enema Arthur Cravan. Described by one critic as “a world tramp … a traverser of borders and resister of orders,” Cravan traveled the globe in the early 1900s by forging documents and assuming false identities, preening, harassing, and haranguing, as he went. He was hailed by André Breton as a pivotal precursor of Dadaism, and belonged to that category of floating prewar avant-gardists whose legacy resides more in their mode of living than their artistic creations. Indeed, he declared himself anti-art and avowed boxing to be the ultimate creative expression of the modern, American-tinged age. He’s often referred to as a “poet-boxer,” though he wasn’t especially accomplished as either; his real talent appears to have been making a spectacle of himself, in every sense. Publicist rather than a pugilist.
          ellauri210.html on line 367: Cravan’s real name was Fabian Avenarius Lloyd; he adopted myriad pseudonyms and aliases during his short life. He was born in Switzerland, in 1887, to Irish and British parents with whom he had a tumultuous relationship, though he was immensely proud of his aunt Constancez, who was Oscar Wilde’s wife. In his early teens, Cravan came to regard the familial link to the world’s most disreputable genius as proof that he was destined for a life of fabulous infamy.
          ellauri210.html on line 369: That journey began in 1903 when, aged sixteen, he was kicked out of his boarding school for an egregious act of indiscipline—according to some, he hit a teacher—and, inspired by his hero Arthur Rimbaud, he left Switzerland in search of adventure. Over the next several years, Cravan took up with hookers in Berlin, hoboed his way from New York to California, and worked in the engine room of a steamship bound for the South Pacific, jumping ship when it docked in Australia. But it was in Paris that the legend of the man we know as Arthur Cravan—writer, brawler, and hoaxer—was cemented. Within the space of six years, he scandalized polite society, infuriated the avant-garde, slugged it out with one of the greatest heavyweights of all time, and then disappeared without a trace.
          ellauri210.html on line 373: By the time Johnson arrived in Paris, Cravan had carved out a reputation as a boxer himself, a discipline he first picked up while traveling across the USA. He was also known as an ardent proponent of the “American” attitude toward life, by which he meant living according to desire and instinct, and telling so-called civilized society to take a running jump. In an essay titled “To Be or Not To Be … American,” he wrote that, thanks to the influence of cakewalk dancers, track athletes, and boxers such as Joe Jeanette, the whole of Paris had turned American. “Overnight,” Cravan said, “everyone began to spit and swear” and “floated around in clothes two sizes too big for them.” He finished the piece with a crib sheet for how to pass as American: “Chew … never speak … always look busy … and, above all else, crown yourself with arrogance.” It was advice he followed assiduously. How right, how true, to this day.
          ellauri210.html on line 375: John Sholto Douglas, 9th Marquess of Queensberry (20 July 1844 – 31 January 1900), was a British nobleman, remembered for his atheism, his outspoken views, his brutish manner, for lending his name to the "Queensberry Rules" that form the basis of modern boxing, and for his role in the downfall of the Irish author and playwright Oscar Wilde.
          ellauri210.html on line 379: At the height of his fame and success, while The Importance of Being Earnest (1895) was still being performed in London, Wilde prosecuted the Marquess of Queensberry for criminal libel. The Marquess was the father of Wilde's lover, Lord Alfred Douglas. The libel trial unearthed evidence that caused Wilde to drop his charges and led to his own arrest and trial for gross indecency with men. After two more trials he was convicted and sentenced to two years' hard labour, the maximum penalty, and was jailed from 1895 to 1897. During his last year in prison, he wrote De Profundis (published posthumously in 1905), a long letter which discusses his spiritual journey through his trials, forming a dark counterpoint to his earlier philosophy of pleasure. On his release, he left immediately for France, and never returned to Ireland or Britain. There he wrote his last work, The Ballad of Reading Gaol (1898), a long poem commemorating the harsh rhythms of prison life. What an opportunity for a man of his caliber, one would have thought.
          ellauri210.html on line 381: In the summer of 1914, Cravan began another phase of wandering. In 1916, he found himself in Barcelona where he somehow managed to book himself a high-profile fight against Jack Johnson. Johnson was in the midst of a celebrated stay in Spain, during which he was received by royalty and starred in movies. Photographs from the fight give some idea of the scale of the event, which was held at Barcelona’s huge bullfighting arena La Monumental. What the photos don’t convey is what a mismatch the fight was. Even a ring-rusty, thirty-eight-year-old Johnson was leagues ahead of Cravan. Johnson won with a sixth-round knockout, though it could’ve been over much sooner had he wished it. There are reports that Cravan shook with fear before the contest began, knowing how out of his depth he was. One writer has suggested that “Johnson and Cravan were more collaborators than competitors,” and that the event was a con, just a hype-fueled payday for an aging legend and a flamboyant interloper with no credible chance of a win—the Mayweather-McGregor of its day. Olikos tää se mazi josta toinen nyrkkipelle Heminwau kirjoitti siinä sonniromaanissa?
          ellauri210.html on line 383: The money Cravan earned from the Johnson fight helped him buy his passage out of Europe, and what he thought was safety from the war. In January 1917, he sailed for New York. Dozens of other European artists and intellectuals were making the same journey at the time; one of Cravan’s shipmates was Leon Trotsky, who noted in his diary that he’d met a man who claimed to be related to Oscar Wilde and “who frankly declared that he would rather smash a Yankee’s face in the noble art of boxing than be done in by a German.” Cravan didn’t stay in New York long; just long enough to put several noses metsphorically out of joint. He split his time between sleeping rough in Central Park and hobnobbing with Greenwich Village bohemians. Among them was the poet Mina Loy, with whom Cravan began an intense love affair.
          ellauri210.html on line 385: New York’s first encounter with modern art had come four years earlier with the seminal Armory Show, at which Duchamp’s Nude Descending a Staircase caused an almighty rumpus. This time, Duchamp presented Fountain, the urinal that changed art history. Having witnessed Cravan’s work back in Paris, Duchamp and Picabia invited Cravan to deliver one of his anti-art lectures at the exhibition. He didn’t disappoint. On the day, he stood half cut in front of his audience, swore at them, waved his cock around, and was promptly arrested.
          ellauri210.html on line 387: Loy referred to Cravan as “Colossus.” It was a reference to the size of his ego as much as that of his "physicality". In her autobiography, she recalled that friends thought her mad to get mixed up with such a conceited, obnoxious prig.
          ellauri210.html on line 507: Wegen zunehmender Konflikte mit seiner Familie zog er sich Anfang September selbst in die Kuranstalt in Wolbeck bei Münster zurück, die er Mitte Oktober aber „fluchtartig“ verließ, um nach Berlin zurückzukehren. Hier wurde er derart auffällig, dass er Ende Oktober in die Heilanstalt „Waldhaus“ in Nikolassee bei Berlin verbracht werden musste, so dass sich Erwin Loewenson an einen langjährigen Freund von Kurt Hiller, den Psychiater Arthur Kronfeld in Heidelberg, mit der Bitte um Unterstützung wandte. Unter dem Titel Gewaltsam ins Irrenhaus war diese Zwangseinweisung Anlass für ein Medienecho – zu einer Zeit allerdings, als van Hoddis schon aus der Anstalt „entwichen“ war. Außerdem studierte er noch die griechische Mythologie und deren Fabelstrukturen. Jedoch hörte er vor dem Ausbruch seiner Krankheit im Herbst 1914 völlig mit der Nutzung der mythologischen Terminologie auf.
          ellauri210.html on line 576: Kurt Hiller wurde in Berlin als Sohn eines jüdischen Fabrikanten geboren, sein Großonkel mütterlicherseits war der SPD-Reichstagsabgeordnete Paul Singer. Hiller machte 1903 sein Abitur als Primus Omnium am Askanischen Gymnasium in Berlin. Danach studierte er an der Berliner Universität Rechtswissenschaft bei Franz von Liszt und Philosophie bei Georg Simmel. Im November 1907 wurde Hiller als Externer an der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg vom Juristen Karl von Lilienthal mit der Dissertation Die kriminalistische Bedeutung des Selbstmordes zum Dr. jur. promoviert. Die Dissertation war der Teil einer rechtsphilosophischen Arbeit unter dem Titel Das Recht über sich selbst, für die Hiller in Berlin keine Anerkennung fand, und in der er die Forderung aufstellte, das Strafrecht müsse die Selbstbestimmung des Menschen stärker berücksichtigen.
          ellauri210.html on line 589: „Demokratie heißt: Herrschaft jeder empirischen Mehrheit; wer wollte bestreiten, daß die Mehrheit des italienischen Volkes seit langem treu hinter Mussolini steht? […] Mussolini, man sehe sich ihn an, ist kein Kaffer, kein Mucker, kein Sauertopf, wie die Prominenten der linksbürgerlichen und bürgerlich-sozialistischen Parteien Frankreichs und Deutschlands und anderer Länder des Kontinents es in der Mehrzahl der Fälle sind; er hat Kultur. […] Wenn ich mich genau prüfe, ist mir Mussolini, dessen Politik ich weder als Deutscher noch als Pazifist noch als Sozialist ihrem Inhalt nach billigen kann, als formaler Typus des Staatsmannes deshalb so sympathisch, weil er das Gegenteil eines Verdrängers ist. Ein weltfroh-eleganter Energiekerl, Sportskerl, Mordskerl, Renaissancekerl, intellektuell, doch mit gemäßigt-reaktionären Inhalten, ist mir lieber, ich leugne es nicht, als ein gemäßigt-linker Leichenbitter, der im Endeffekt auch nichts hervorbringt, was den Mächten der Beharrung irgend Abbruch tut.“
          ellauri210.html on line 636: Arp muutti 1926 Ranskaan, jossa hän pääasiallisesti asui. Hän irrottautui 1931 surrealismista perustaakseen Abstraction-Créationin ja työskenteli Pariisissa toimineen Abstraction-Création-ryhmän kanssa sekä kirjoitti artikkeleita aikakauskirjaan Transition. Koko 1930-luvun ja elämänsä loppuun asti hän kirjoitti ja julkaisi esseitä ja runoja. Vuonna 1942 hän pakeni kotoaan Meudonista saksalaisten miehityksen alta ja asui Zürichissä sodan päättymiseen saakka. Hän kirjoitti ranskaksi ja saksaksi.
          ellauri210.html on line 640: Arpin ensimmäinen vaimo, taiteilija Sophie Taeuber-Arp, kuoli Zürichissä 13.1.1943. Vuonna 1959 hän avioitui taiteenkerääjä Marguerite Hagenbachin kanssa.
          ellauri210.html on line 751: Appelé au front lors de la Première Guerre mondiale, il en revient blessé et profondément marqué. Il est blessé aux jambes le 25 septembre 1915 à Tahure, à la suite de l'explosion d'un sac de grenades pendant la Bataille de Champagne (1915). Pacifiste et anarchiste, il est dégouté par la guerre. Sa personnalité a exercé une profonde influence sur André Breton qu'il rencontre pendant sa convalescence. Peu de temps après le conflit, Jacques Vaché meurt par overdose d'opium dans un hôtel nantais à l'âge de 23 ans.
          ellauri210.html on line 753: Alongside him lay the naked body of another French soldier. André Breton believed his death to be a suicide (LOL). He was known for his indifference and for wearing a monocle.
          ellauri210.html on line 776: Michel del Castillo (or Michel Janicot del Castillo), born in Madrid on August 2, 1933, is a Spanish-French writer. Interned in a concentration camp named Rieucros in Mende with his mother during the Second World War, he developed a sense of belonging to this town, which has honored him with naming a school after him. Wow.
          ellauri210.html on line 780: The novel starts in Spain in 1939, during the Spanish civil war, when Tanguy is forced to flee the country with his mother because of her left wing political affiliations. They find themselves in France, which is no less hostile. Forsaken by his father, Tanguy and his mother are arrested by the police and sent off to a camp for political refugees where life is difficult and they face many a hardship and insult. Finally able to escape, Tanguy's mother now decides to flee to London. In order to escape unnoticed from France, they must travel separately and Tanguy is thus separated from his mother. Discovered by the German troops he is packed off to another concentration camp where he endures a life of hunger, cold and forced physical labour that break his body and spirit, the only respite being in a young German pianist who befriends him and reminds him time and again not to hate for hatred breeds nothing but hatred. LOL.
          ellauri210.html on line 782: After the war, Tanguy is sent back to Spain, Barcelona where he learns that his grandmother has recently passed away and there is no one else to take care of him. He is sent to a reformation school for juvenile delinquents and orphans, run by priests who are no less cruel and sadist than the Nazi "kapos." Bitter, Tanguy believes they are worse than the Nazis because these priests hide their sadism behind the facade of religion and confession, but that makes their sin no less. He succeeds in escaping along with a "companion," but is forced to separate from his as well. This time around, he finds himself in a school run by a group of priests but unlike the reformation school, here, Tanguy is able to grow, learn and live comfortably. It is here, that he truly flourishes and finds friends and solace. But he is still not completely at peace and sets off again in search of the parents who had abandoned and forsaken him to such a bitter destiny. He does find them eventually, but only to realise that the years of hardship and horror experienced by him have built an impenetrable barrier between them. He is no longer a left wing radical like them. He has learned not to hate the capos. Don't get mad get even. LOL.
          ellauri210.html on line 784: Ja vielä 1 Tanguy: Tanguy is a 2001 French black comedy by Étienne Chatiliez. When he was a newborn baby, Edith Guetz thoughtlessly told her son Tanguy : "If you want to, you can stay at home forever". 28 years later, the over-educated university teacher of Asian languages and womanizer leads a successful and wealthy life... while still living in his parents' home. Father Paul Guetz longs to see his son finally leave the nest, a desire that his wife shares. Edith finally agrees and the pair unite to make Tanguy's life at home miserable. However, they don't know that Tanguy isn't the type of guy who easily gives up. The word Tanguy became the usual term to designate an adult still living with his parents.
          ellauri210.html on line 831: The word “Dada” brings to mind an international range of extreme modernist antics. The book’s title is something of a publicist’s misnomer. Jacques Rigaut is the only confirmed suicide among the group, and while Jacques Vache did die of a drug overdose, many, including author Michel Leiris, claimed that his death was accidental, characterized as deliberate by those aiming to enhance Vache’s cultural cache. Arthur Cravan and Julian Torma simply disappeared, wandering into, rather than jumping towards, the cracks of avant-garde history. Of the four only Rigaut is genuinely obsessed with themes of self-destruction.
          ellauri210.html on line 833: Tristan Tzara captured the inspired lunacy in his 1921 Dada Manifesto on Lukewarm Love. Marcel Duchamp’s “Readymades,” or Francis Picabia’s canvases of human figures as functionless machines belong here. Dada began as a limited franchise, with key outposts in Zurich, Berlin, Paris, and New York. Preceding the Surrealist movement by several years, and often inspired by the Communist Party (though not tied to it), its origins lay in a militant nostalgia for a pre-war lost Eden. Dadaists sought “an art based on fundamentals to cure the madness of the age and a new order of things that would restore the balance between heaven and hell." (Jean Arp).
          ellauri210.html on line 841: On November 6, 1929, he returned to a clinic where he was staying and — according to Andre Breton — “after paying minute attention to his toilette, and carrying out all the necessary external adjustments demanded of such a departure” — calmly put a bullet through his heart. Not his head like Richard Cory, who had everything a man could want: power, grace and style.
          ellauri210.html on line 843: But I work in his factory
          ellauri210.html on line 850: "Richard Cory" is a narrative poem written by Edwin Arlington Robinson. It was first published in 1897, as part of The Children of the Night, having been completed in July of that year; and it remains one of Robinson's most popular and anthologized poems. The poem describes a person who is wealthy, well educated, mannerly, and admired by the people in his town. Despite all this, he takes his own life.
          ellauri210.html on line 853: "Richard Cory went home last night and put a bullet through his head".
          ellauri210.html on line 992: À l'été 1932, la troupe est invitée à Moscou d'où Jacques Prévert ne revient pas militant communiste. Toute sa vie, Jacques Prévert témoigne d'un engagement politique sincère. Surréaliste inclassable, certains observateurs n'hésitent pourtant pas à l'apparenter au courant libertaire : anarchiste de cœur, Prévert se dit « rêveur » ou « artisan » plutôt que « poète ».
          ellauri210.html on line 1113: In 1936 Carrington saw the work of the German surrealist Max Ernst at the International Surrealist Exhibition in London and was attracted to the Surrealist artist before she even met him. In 1937 Carrington met Ernst at a party held in London. The artists bonded and returned together to Paris, where Ernst promptly separated from his wife.
          ellauri210.html on line 1115: Between 1937–1938 Carrington painted a Self-Portrait, where she is perched on the edge of a chair in this curious, dreamlike scene, her hand outstretched toward a prancing hyena and her back to a tailless rocking horse flying behind her. The hyena depicted in Self-Portrait (1937–38) joins both male and female into a whole, metaphoric of the worlds of the night and the dream. The symbol of the hyena is present in many of Carrington's later works, including "La Debutante" in her book of short stories The Oval Lady.
          ellauri210.html on line 1117: With the outbreak of World War II Ernst, who was German, was arrested by the French authorities for being a "hostile alien". Soon after the Nazis invaded France, Ernst was arrested again, this time by the Gestapo, because his art was considered by the Nazis to be "degenerate". Fucking West and East Germans, same huns and hyenas on both sides!
          ellauri210.html on line 1152: Gisèle Prassinos a légué à la Bibliothèque historique de la ville de Paris un riche fonds [archive] de manuscrits. Son œuvre artistique a été légué à sa nièce Catherine Prassinos (voir le site de Mario Prassinos).
          ellauri210.html on line 1171: Arrêté et passé à tabac après avoir uriné sur la tombe du Soldat inconnu en protestation contre la guerre d'Algérie (the anglo-saxon page does not mention his motivation), il est emprisonné, puis interné à l'hôpital Sainte-Anne en juillet 1959.
          ellauri210.html on line 1173: Three days before his death, he said calmly to a friend: "I am allergic to this planet". He wrote his final book in 1959 and upon completion, he asked his wife to send the manuscript to Breton. When she returned from the post office, she found him dead; he had hanged himself on the main beam of his studio. Another exit in the style of David Foster Wallace. Did he give a damn to how his wife might have taken it? Well maybe she was relieved. Asta is allergic to Miryam's kitty Chico but bears it, taking antihistamines. When she has had a bad day, she curls up in her room with Kitty in her lap.
          ellauri210.html on line 1216: Alphonse Rabbe (1786—1829) tunnetaan pessimistinä. Usein romanttisen pessimismin esimerkkinä pidetty Rabbe, nuori, komea ja älykäs, sairastui kuppaan ja nautti liikaa oopiumia. Hän kirjoitti journalismia ja vähäarvoisia historiallisia kokoelmia ja lopuksi postuumisti julkaistun (1835) Album d'un pessimiste , osittain Rabben ja muiden havaintojen antologian elämän merkityksettömyydestä ja kuoleman väistämättömyydestä sekä äärimmäisen sardonista. ja katkeria proosarunoja, jotka inspiroivat Baudelairea. Välillä syvästi liikuttava...
          ellauri210.html on line 1228: KHEIRON (Chiron) was eldest and wisest of the Kentauroi (Centaurs), a Thessalian tribe of half-horse men. Unlike his brethren Kheiron was an immortal son of the Titan Kronos (Cronus) and a half-brother of Zeus. When Kronos' "tryst" (more correctly, thrust) with the nymphe Philyra was interrupted by Rhea, he transformed himself into a horse halfway out to escape notice and the result was this two-formed son.
          ellauri210.html on line 1234: The old Kentauros was accidentally wounded by Herakles when the hero was battling other members of the tribe. The wound, poisoned with Hydra-venom, was incurable, and suffering unbearable pain Kheiron voluntarily relinquished his immortality.
          ellauri210.html on line 1250: George Shaw, known at his insistence as Bernard Shaw, was an Irish playwright, critic, polemicist and political activist. His influence on the Western hemisphefre, culture and politics extended from the 1880s to his death and beyond. He wrote more than sixty plays, including major works such as Man and Superman (1902), Pygmalion (1913) and Saint Joan (1923). With a range incorporating both contemporary satire and historical allegory, Pshaw became the leading dramatist of his generation, and in 1925 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature.
          ellauri210.html on line 1263: In the final decade of his life, Shaw declared that "until the Federation of the World becomes an accomplished fact we must accept the most responsible Imperial federations (the anglo saxons) as a substitute for it".
          ellauri210.html on line 1266: The fellow-writer H. G. Wells had joined the "vet Fabian' society in February 1903. Wells's ideas for reform—particularly his proposals for closer cooperation with the Independent Labour Party—placed him at odds with the society's "Old Gang", led by Shaw. In Shaw's view, "the Old Gang did not extinguish Mr Wells, he annihilated himself".
          ellauri210.html on line 1270: Since Shaw's death scholarly and critical opinion about his works has varied, but he has regularly been rated among British dramatists as second rate, almost on a par with Shakespeare. One Shaw's comedy made Edward VII laugh so hard that he broke his chair.
          ellauri210.html on line 1272: Shaw was born at 3 Upper Synge Street in Portobello, a lower-middle-class part of Dublin. The Shaw family was of English descent and belonged to the dominant Protestant Ascendancy in Ireland. George Carr Shaw, Bernir's dad, an ineffectual alcoholic, was among the family's less successful members. By the time of Shaw's birth, his mother had become close to George John Lee, a flamboyant figure well known in Dublin's musical circles. Shaw retained a lifelong obsession that Lee might have been his biological father. Shaw made a negligible income from writing, and was subsidised by Lee plus his mother. In 1881, for the sake of economy, and as a matter of principle, he became a vegetarian. He grew a beard to hide a facial scar left by smallpox.
          ellauri210.html on line 1275: He had been celibate until his twenty-ninth birthday, when his shyness was overcome by Jane (Jenny) Patterson, a widow some years his senior. All things considered, he preferred men's company as much as Michael Montaigne. Why can't a woman be more like a man?
          ellauri210.html on line 1277: My friend responded saying that gay men and women have dependent relationships all the time and it absolutely does not mean the man is not gay or that he is falling for her. Today we call this a 'hag' and they routinely do for women the things Higgins did for Eliza, (make her more fashionable, improve her appeal to men, etc). I am not saying he absolutely was gay, in fact I still think its probable he's not, but its definitely something to consider.
          ellauri210.html on line 1310: It is based on Breton's actual "interactions" with a young woman, Nadja (actually Léona Camille Ghislaine Delacourt 1902–1941), over the course of ten days, and is presumed to be a semi-autobiographical description of his relationship with a patient of Pierre Janet. The book's non-linear structure is grounded in reality by references to other Paris surrealists such as Louis Aragon and 44 photographs. Tästä E. Saarinen lie ottanut postmodernia mallia.
          ellauri210.html on line 1314: Dating from 1960, the widely available English translation by Richard Howard is a translation of the first edition of Breton's novel, dating from 1928. Breton published a second, revised edition in 1963. No English translation of this second edition is currently available. Ketäpä enää kiinnostaa.
          ellauri210.html on line 1316: The narrator, randomly named André, ruminates on a number of Surrealist principles, before ultimately commencing (around a third of the way through the novel) on a narrative account, generally linear, of his brief ten-day affair with the titular character Nadja. She is so named “because in Russian it's the beginning of the word hope, and because it's only the beginning,” but her name might also evoke the Spanish "Nadie," which means "No one." The narrator becomes obsessed with this woman with whom he, upon a chance encounter while walking through the street, strikes up conversation immediately. He becomes reliant on daily rendezvous, occasionally culminating in romance (a kiss here and there). His true fascination with Nadja, however, is her vision of the world, which is often provoked through a discussion of the work of a number of Surrealist artists, including himself. While her understanding of existence subverts the rigidly authoritarian quotidian, it is later discovered that she is mad and belongs in a sanitarium. After Nadja reveals too many details of her past life, she in a sense becomes demystified, and the narrator realizes that he cannot continue their relationship.
          ellauri210.html on line 1318: In the remaining quarter of the text, André distances himself from her corporeal form and descends into a meandering rumination on her absence, so much so that one wonders if her absence offers him greater inspiration than does her presence. It is, after all, the reification and materialization of Nadja as an ordinary person that André ultimately despises and cannot tolerate to the point of inducing tears. There is something about the closeness once felt between the narrator and Nadja that indicated a depth beyond the limits of conscious rationality, waking logic, and sane operations of the everyday. There is something essentially “mysterious, improbable, unique, bewildering” about her; this reinforces the notion that their propinquity serves only to remind André of Nadja's impenetrability. Her eventual recession into absence is the fundamental concern of this text, an absence that permits Nadja to live freely in André's conscious and unconscious, seemingly unbridled, maintaining her paradoxical role as both present and absent. With Nadja's past fixed within his own memory and consciousness, the narrator is awakened to the impenetrability of reality and perceives a particularly ghostly residue peeking from under its thin veil. Thus, he might better put into practice his theory of Surrealism, predicated on the dreaminess of the experience of reality within reality itself. Nadja Nadja soromnoo.
          ellauri210.html on line 1332: tence dans le monde de Prassinos”. El miedo a la separación de la madre los convierte en seres débiles, sujetos eternamente al complejo de Edipo, suspendidos en sus particulares “bizarreries”, ayudan al desarrollo de la historia en un tono naïf y amable. Estos complejos parecen parar el tiempo para jugar con la impresión de que estamos ante personajes sin edad.
          ellauri210.html on line 1378: Mansour’s first published collection of poems, titled: Cris, was published in Paris in 1953 by Pierre Seghers. This collection of work references male and female anatomy in explicit language that was unusual for the time. Religious language can also be found. However, it is inverted, replacing what would be Christ with the lover. References of Egyptian mythology are also present in Cris. Mansour references the White Goddess as well as Hathor.
          ellauri210.html on line 1382: Jean Benoît (1922-2010) was a Canadian artist known as "The Enchanter of Serpents", most famous for his surrealist sculptures. One sculpture called "Book Cover for Magnetic Fields" features demonic figures ripping an egg from a book. Magnetic Fields was the name of the book Breton wrote with Philippe Soupault, which Breton called the first surrealist book. Many of his works include demonic figures, brutal sexual images, exaggerated phalluses, and so on. Benoît was active and remained productive, working every day on his art until he died on August 20, 2010, in Paris. He was 88.
          ellauri210.html on line 1460: Andrew Lang FBA (31 March 1844 – 20 July 1912) was a Scottish poet, novelist, literary critic, and contributor to the field of anthropology. He is best known as a collector of folk and fairy tales. The Andrew Lang lectures at the University of St Andrews are named after him. Ei sentään koko yliopisto. Eikös se ole se missä kaikki Englannin kruunun kermaperseet keitetään? He died of angina pectoris on 20 July 1912 at the Tor-na-Coille Hotel in Banchory, Banchory, survived by his wife.
          ellauri211.html on line 74: A hard-nosed hit man Raid returns to Finland and is unofficially asked to investigate the arson case involving his old flame Tarja. 10-varpainen palkkamurhaaja häviää 6-varpaiselle.
          ellauri211.html on line 92: Rei kuulostaa tosi nelikymppiseltä tässä jorinassa. Sillä on hirvee darra lähdettyään kesken birthday partysta. Hughissa on selviä alkoholismin merkkejä. Se ei saa mennä omaan makuuhuoneeseensa koska Chika serkku nukkuu siellä. Järkevää varovaisuutta Reiltä, Chika on vasta 22. Ällöttävästi Rei ostaa kahvin ulos pahvimukissa ja heittää pois puolet juotuaan. Pitää metrossa tiukasti kiinni käsilaukusta. On koukussa gymin ohjattuihin kuntosaliharjoituxiin, joogaan ja balettiin. Niissä se venyttelee pikku japsupillua. Japanin USAn konsuli on hyvin korkeassa asemassa. Mutta tässä jorinassa roistovaltio on varmalla Irak, kuten sopii ajankohtaan. Pikakelaus tähän mennessä tapahtuneesta. Lonkkorotta pyörittää edelleen Tokiossa konsulttibisnestä. Päätöxeni palata yhteen Shagin kaa oli ollut Takeolle ikävä yllätys. Eli lue kaikki aikaisemmatkin seikkailuni! Takeo on nyt kukkien asettelukoulun rehtori. Se ostelee laittomasti vaaseja.
          ellauri211.html on line 115: (1) Kyoto - This target is an urban industrial
          ellauri211.html on line 135: Ilman agenttien väliintuloa pojat olisivat voineet päätyä putkaan tavallisten rikollisten joukkoon. Lakukeppikin vielä messissä. Onnexi niillä oli suhteita. Aika koettelevaa. Reistä on tulossa varsinainen moniosaaja. 2000v vanhasta uurnasta uhkuu historiallisuutta. Oops! Shag pistäytyi ilman lupaa Edinburghissa shäggimässä Fionaa. Se oli vain lyhyt kihlaus, Rei vähätteli. En ollut koskaan tapaillut Michael Hendricksin tapaista periamerikkalaista miestä jonka puvutkin on periamerikkalaista L.L. Beania. Hei, tää on varmaan nyze Massey. Juujuu, Annapoliisissa opiskellut mariini. Olixe tsunamikirjan crewcut äijä nimeltänsä Michael? No kyllä oli, kz. albumia 176. Mahtavaa kulttuurista appropriointia. Rei voisi seuraavaxi seikkailla meri-Lapissa amer. rykmentin ilolintuna.
          ellauri211.html on line 146: This incident began with the Japanese who were furious with the Chinese Resistance, and when Nanking, the capital of China, fell in December 1937, Japanese troops immediately massacred thousands of Chinese soldiers who had surrendered to them. The Japanese then rounded up about 20,000 Chinese youths and transported them by truck to the outside of the city walls, where they would be massacred there. Japanese troops then looted the city of Nanking and raped most of the city´s female population.
          ellauri211.html on line 148: During this time, the Imperial Japanese army killed between 40,000 and 300,000 people. This admittedly inexact number is the total number of civilians and soldiers killed.
          ellauri211.html on line 152: Noin vuodesta 1972 alkaen Japanissa alettiin kieltää Nanjingin verilöylyn todenperäisyys. Surmansa saaneiden lukumäärän väitettiin olevan huomattavasti nykyään todenmukaisena pidettyä, yli 300 000 pienempi, noin 38 000–42 000. Suurempia lukuja väitettiin kiinalaisten suurentelemiksi. Teoksessa esitetään antautuneiden ja vangittujen sotilaiden tappamisen olevan jotain muuta kuin ”verilöyly”. Se oli pikemminkin "voiton päivän paraati". Ainakin vielä vuonna 1990 teos oli Japanin opetusministeriön mukaan virallisen historiakäsityksen mukainen.
          ellauri211.html on line 154: Totuutta on koetettu muuntaa Japanissa muuttamalla historiankirjojen merkityksiä, mikä on saanut paheksuntaa osakseen ulkomaiden taholta. Tämä ei kuitenkaan ole saanut Japanin opetusministeriötä myöntämään, että totuuden muuntaminen olisi ollut virhe. Viralliselta taholta on myös esitetty väitteitä, joiden mukaan Nanjingin verilöylyä ei koskaan tapahtunut ja että kyseinen tapahtuma on kiinalaisten keksimä tarina. Näin ovat väittäneet muun muassa sen kaltaiset tahot kuin parlamentin jäsen Shintarō Ishihara ja Japanin Houstonin-konsuli.
          ellauri211.html on line 156: Japani ei ole vieläkään tunnustanut Nanjingin verilöylyä virallisesti. Tämä aiheuttaa kitkaa maiden välille ja estää maan sisällä tapahtuvan historian uudelleenarvioinnin. Mitäs hyvää muuttamaan.
          ellauri211.html on line 160: Hiroshima ja Nagasaki ovat kaksi japanilaista kaupunkia, joita kumpaakin vastaan Yhdysvallat hyökkäsi atomipommilla elokuussa vuonna 1945 (Hiroshima 6. elokuuta ja Nagasaki 9. elokuuta). Ne ovat ainoat kohteet ihmiskunnan historiassa, joita vastaan ydinpommia on käytetty sodassa. Iskujen katsotaan olleen merkittävä tekijä toisen maailmansodan päättymisessä.
          ellauri211.html on line 173: Hiroshiman ja Nagasakin pommit näyttivät, miten voimakas ase atomipommi on: yksi pommikone kykeni tuhoamaan kokonaisen kaupungin, kun siihen aiemmin tarvittiin satojen koneiden hyökkäys ja jopa yli 20 prosentin kalusto- ja miehistötappiot sitä suoritettaessa. Body count lie ollut noin 200 000, mutta plus-puolelle on laskettava että ne oli 100% viirusilmiä.
          ellauri211.html on line 295:

          Totta puhuen ei tämä tekohämmentyneenä hymyilevä persepääkään ole ihan eilisen teeren poika kuvalehtien keskiaukeamaärvönä. Kun hän kihlasi tunnetun valokuvamallin, vasta Njuu Jorkista maahan laskeutuneen bisnesenkelinsä, heidän yhteinen taipaleensa alkoi ei vähempää kuin Ilta-Sanomissa ja Hymy lehdessä! ja heidän suuret häänsä huomattavassa Hämeenkyrossä nousivat Seuran ja Annan etusivuille! Turha häntä on tyrkkiä lavatähden paasipojaksi! Siitä äkämystyneenä hämäläinen Ranu alkoi ize pyytää roskalehdiltä haastatteluja lupaa kysymättä savvoo viäntävältä Katrilta. Ranu myhäili salaperäisenä ja näppi ize izestään belfieitä. Tiesihän sen etukäteen ettei siitä mitään tullut, olivat ihan eri kaliiperia, toinen kestojulkkis toinen wannabe. Hui kuinka Ranu onkin vastenmielinen. Se kuzuu äxäänsä vuoroin laulajaxi vuoroin lavatähdexi. Izeään se tituleeraa kyrvänpää-expertixi. Potkut saaneen peesarin voimatonta kiukkua. Tampereen oikeistosiiven Aamulehdessä, jossa perusporvarillinen Ranu on vakisenttaaja, sekä huomattavassa Hämeenkyrön Sanomissa saa peesarikin palstamillimetrejä. Mahtavan tonniston narsisti! Iltalehden Aila Seppalän puffi on Ranusta "puhtaasti ja kauniisti kirjoitettu." "Katse ja kädenpuristus kertovat paljon. Pana Rajalan terse on rehevä ja lämmin, mahanalusote avoin, utelias ja leikkisä, miehen suoro Sentun pöydän alla vahvistaa ennakkotuntemuksen: Pan on Katrinansa ansainnut." Vizi mitä tuubaa! Jutussa käydään mallikkaasti läpi miehen työhistoria, hänen kirjoittamansa Sillanpään elämäkerta odottaa vielä kolmatta ja huipentavaa osaansa, hänen näytelmäsovituxkistaan on äsken nähty Elämä ja aurink Molojunkaterina, Pyynikille on tulossa Ale ellers on työn alla nuskailtavana Tamge Temerin historian toinen osa. Dosent pissii hunajaa ja tunnustelee töröhampaisen TV-lasisen Aila Meriluodon mahanalusta. Markku Envallilta meni pari vuotta uuden onnen aforisointiin. Kiireinen jokapaikan dosentti aikoo selvitä nopeammin. Ranun izetunto on horjahteleva. Ilmi narsisti! Kazeet kääntyivät Hämeenkyrössä kun Ranu tuli ostamaan Seura-lehteä. Katrin vanhemmat haisee kaskisavulta ja Bertta mummi on riuskasti hymyilevä murretta pulppuava kansannainen. Hizi Ranu kopioi naistenlehtityyliä. Oven avaa Taisto Tammen mummo, hymyilevä rouva Hagert. Ranu lukee Seura-lehdestä rakastaako hän oikeasti Katria. Onko Katrin maalaisporukat sille riittävästi hienoja? Vinoiliko vääräleuka Wexi Koistinen sille salamielisesti jotenkin? Panu antaa ymmärtää että tyhmä Katri on Ranuun aivan lääpällään, Ranu miettii vielä ostopäätöstä. Höh, avattu pakkaus on ostopäätös.
          ellauri211.html on line 301: Tämän kirjan pitäisi olla alaotsikon mukaisesti rakkauskertomus. Panu Rajalan pitäisi kirjoittaa ”elämästään Katri Helenan kanssa hellän suorasukaisesti, itseään säästämättä, vailla kaunaa ja katkeruutta, muistaen kaiken kauniin, murheen ja tuskankin tunnustaen”. Pah. Suorusukaisuutta löytyy, mutta varsinkin löytyy kaunaa ja katkeruutta. Kauneus kääntyy nopeasti murheeksi ja ainakin tämän lukijan osaksi tuli tuska. Jos omahyväisyydellä on nimi, se voisi olla Panu Rajala.

          Kustantaja ei ainakaan säästele ylisanoissa, mainiten Rajalan ”maamme luetuimmaksi elämäkertakirjailijaksi”. Tämän lukijan mielestä hän tuntuu olevan ainakin omasta mielestään maamme tuotteliain ja laadukkain kirjailija. Painosten kuninkaaksi häntä ainakin voi tituleerata, onhan aiemmasta paljastuskirjasta Enkeli tulessa otettu liki 10 painosta.

          Lavatähti ja kirjamies on alusta alkaen asenteellinen teos. Rajalalle viihdetaiteilijuus ei merkitse mitään. Hän onnistuu väheksymään pitkän uran tehnyttä tähteä, teki tämä mitä hyvänsä. Vain kansanmusiikista ja -runoudesta vaikutteita ottava levytys saa kirjamiehen hyväksynnän. Kirjamiehen maailmankuvaan ei sovi, ettei lavatähti lue romaaneja. Henkisen kasvun ja tuonpuoleisesta elämästä kertovat teokset hän leimaa hömpäksi ja viiden pennin aforismeiksi. Rajalan mielestä Katri Helena ei pärjää viisaiden kulttuuri-ihmisten parissa. Kukapa viihtyisi seurassa, joka katsoo alaspäin.

          Oman täydellisyyden kirjamies muistaa tuoda esille. Hänen erehdyksensä ovat inhimillisiä, jotka miehelle sallittakoon. Hän myöntää ehdollisesti saattaneensa tai taitaneensa tehdä sitä tai tätä, ja sitten ihmettelee, kun toisella on eri näkemys asioista. Hän on rehellinen kun tähti on tekopyhä. Hänen työnsä ovat kulttuurihistoriallisesti tärkeää, tähden henkistä onanointia. Miehen itsetuntoon taitaa koskea olla avec, harvemmin ensisijaisesti kutsuttu.


          ellauri213.html on line 115: Samaan aikaan Etupepan kyky hallita säätä kasvatti hänessä tarvetta tukahduttaa tunteitaan luonnonkatastrofien estämiseksi, mikä ei ole terveellistä kuten näemme Greta Thunbergista ja Brunosta. Samanlaista erityisherkkyyttä näemme hänen lapsissaan. Dolores (Avalokitasvara) joka kuulee kaiken, on jatkuvasti tietoinen siitä, mitä muut ihmiset sanovat ja on siksi jatkuvasti varuillaan kaiken disinformaation vuoksi, jota hänellä on käytettävissään. Hänen veljeänsä isä Camiloa voidaan pitää myös tunne-elämän tukahduttajana, koska hän pystyy mukautumaan fyysisesti (5-15 cm, 25 jos olet taitava) ja emotionaalisesti vastataxeen muiden tarpeisiin. Se ei ole terveellistä, on tärkeää olla terveen egoistinen, let it cum kun on tullaxeen. Kauppatieteen käyneet liikejohtajat pihistävät palkoista osakkeenomistajan hyväxi. Palkat on niille vain kuluerä. Tää leffa on erittäinkin matriarkaalinen. Miesrooleissa ukkivainaja, läski neekeri, isä (ruipelo), teini muodonmuuttaja, "el Chapo", tärähtänyt homo setä, plus eläimiä hätyyttävä vintiö.
          ellauri213.html on line 122: 6 syytä mixi Embotellado on paras Disney filmi ever: 1) sankari ei ole super eikä oikeastaan tee koko aikana mitään merkillistä. 2) Pätkässä ei ole pahista. Mummun pärmänttäyskin osoittautuu puolustettavaxi. 3) Kehenkään ei satu pahasti paizi Pedroon, eikä silläkään herkutella. 4) Hullunkurisen veikeitä vekkuleita on suhteellisen vähän. 5) On paljon tyyppejä mutta kukaan ei ole erityisen tärkeä. 6) Taika on täysin maallista, ize asiassa sivuasia.
          ellauri213.html on line 183: with an impulsive drive and need to be in control. This may
          ellauri213.html on line 204: Let’s first look at direct demands. Direct demands are requests or questions made by other people or situations – such as ‘put your shoes on’, ‘sit here and wait’, ‘pay this bill’ or ‘would you like a drink?’. In addition to these more obvious direct demands, there’s a whole raft of indirect and internal demands, including:
          ellauri213.html on line 220: Praise – this carries the implied expectation that the action will be carried out again or improved on next time, and so may not achieve the positive reinforcement that may be intended
          ellauri213.html on line 243: Augustine and Thomas Aquinas had formulated the view that whoever deliberately took away the life given to them by their Creator showed the utmost disregard for the will and authority of God and jeopardized their salvation, encouraging the Church to treat suicide as a sin. By the early 1960s, however, the Church of England was re-evaluating its stance on the legality of suicide, and decided that counselling, psychotherapy and suicide prevention intervention before the event took place would be a better solution than criminalisation of what amounted to an act of despair in this context.
          ellauri213.html on line 251: You join together with thousands of other members for a set programme reflective of the host country’s culture and customs. As well as a huge closing ceremony. This event is for members aged 16 to 22. Sadly the next World Scout Moot in 2022 has been cancelled, but we hope this will take place again in 2025. We hiked, swam, explored one another and ate our shorts becoming really great friends. Learned how to give support during the Ukraine conflict. The 25th World Scout Jamboree will take place in 2023 in South Korea. Lieköhän yhtään venäläisiä kaukopartiolaisia kuzuttujen joukossa?
          ellauri213.html on line 254: In 1908, Baden-Powell's book Scouting for Boys came out in Russia by the order of Tsar Nicholas II. It was called Young Scout (Юный Разведчик, Yuny Razvedchik). On April 30 [O.S. April 17] 1909, a young officer, Colonel Oleg Pantyukhov, organized the first Russian Scout troop Beaver (Бобр, Bobr) in Pavlovsk, a town near Tsarskoye Selo, St. Petersburg region. In 1910, Baden-Powell visited Nicholas II in Tsarskoye Selo and they had a very pleasant conversation, as the Tsar remembered it. In 1914, Pantyukhov established a society called Russian Scout (Русский Скаут, Russkiy Skaut). The first Russian Scout campfire was lit in the woods of Pavlovsk Park in Tsarskoye Selo. A Russian Scout song exists to remember this event. Scouting spread rapidly across Russia and into Siberia, and by 1916, there were about 50,000 Scouts in Russia. Nicholas' son Tsarevich Aleksei was a Scout himself.
          ellauri213.html on line 311: The Sun ceased publishing topless Page 3 images in its Republic of Ireland edition in 2013, in its UK editions in 2015, and on its Page3.com website in 2017. The Daily Star also ceased publishing images of topless glamour models in 2019. However, these decisions were not necessarily a direct result of the No More Page 3 campaign. The then official photographer for Page 3, Alison Webster, also criticised the campaign, saying "people should be able to make their own choices". Prime Minister David Cameron replied, "I think on this one I think it is probably better to leave it to the consumer."
          ellauri213.html on line 312:

          In August 2013, The Sun's Republic of Ireland edition replaced topless Page 3 girls with clothed glamour models. Its UK editions followed suit in January 2015, discontinuing Page 3 after more than 44 years. The Daily Star became the last print daily to drop topless photographs, moving to a clothed glamour format in April 2019. This ended the Page 3 convention in Britain's mainstream tabloid press. As of 2022, the only British tabloid still publishing topless models is the niche Sunday Sport. Only old geezers buy it anymore. Others prefer peering down the bottomless pit.
          ellauri213.html on line 329:

          TWA flight 741 was one of three planes successfully hijacked by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine that day — the hijacking of an El Al plane was foiled by the onboard sky marshals. At the time, I was a 14-year old foreskinned kid living in Trenton, New Jersey, whose only care was how the Baltimore Orioles were doing. This event changed my life, as well as the lives of the other 350 people who were on those planes. Mostly for the better, we became instant celebrities.

          Imagine the horror and disgust that I, my family and other hijack victims experienced when we read that Leila Khaled, one of the hijackers directly involved in the 1970 attacks, had been invited by San Francisco State University to address a forum on Gender, Justice and Resistance. Ms. Khaled is a convicted terrorist. She has paid her debt to society. She is a member of the PFLP. She is a symbol not of justice and resistance, but of wanton terrorism and death. Khaled spent only a few days in jail. After her failed hijacking of the El Al plane, she was transferred by the Israeli sky marshals to the British police and released in exchange for hostages when a fifth plane was hijacked to secure her freedom.
          ellauri213.html on line 333: The most distressing and disheartening thing, 50 years after this horrible experience, is that the Western world (including us middle easterners) has not eradicated this type of terrorism. As recently as January 2020, the PFLP (through Palestinian NGOs) received financial support of millions of dollars from European countries, the United States, Canada, Japan, UN-OCHA and UNICEF. That money should have come to us instead! We know how to handle capital after all, got the talent for it.
          ellauri213.html on line 419: In discussion of science fiction, a Big Dumb Object (BDO) is any mysterious object, usually of extraterrestrial or unknown origin and immense power, in a story which generates an intense sense of wonder by its mere existence. To a certain extent, the term deliberately deflates this.
          ellauri213.html on line 429: Abu Nidal kuoli saamiinsa 1–4 ampumahaavaan Bagdadissa elokuussa 2002. Palestiinalaiset lähteet uskoivat tappokäskyn tulleen Saddam Husseinilta sen jälkeen kun hänelle esitettiin todisteet Nidalin osuudesta Irakin hallinnon syrjäyttämissuunnitelmiin. Irakin sisäinen turvallisuuspalvelu oli luultavasti Nidalin murhan takana. Abu Nidal oli yksi maailman etsityimmistä miehistä. Hänen uskotaan olleen mukana järjestämässä satoja ihmisiä tappaneita iskuja pariinkymmeneen eri maahan, vaikka Irakin hallitus väitti Nidalin kuolleen oman käden kautta. The Guardian kirjoitti Nidalista tämän kuoleman paljastettuaan: ”Hän oli patriootti, samanniminen kuin vihreen talon jenkin ruskee jeeppi. Hän palveli vain itseään, vain omia kieroutuneita tarpeitaan, jotka ajoivat hänet kammottaviin rikoksiin. Hän oli palkkasoturien palkkasoturi.” Tää oli takuulla taas länsipropagandaa.
          ellauri213.html on line 434: Seuraavassa on listattuna pahoja naisia rikkomuxineen (kuvissa söpöset alleviivattu): Irma Grese (Naziwächterin), Myra Hindley (serial pedocide), Isabela of Castile (born in the year 1451 and died in 1504, Isabella the Catholic, was queen of Castile and León. She and her husband, Ferdinand II of Aragon, brought stability to the kingdoms that became the basis for the unification of Spain. Isabella and Ferdinand are known for completing the Reconquista, ordering conversion or exile of their Muslim and Jewish subjects and financing Christopher Columbus’ 1492 voyage that led to the opening of the “New World”. Isabella was granted the title Servant of God by the Catholic Church in 1974), Beverly Allitt (pedocide, Angel of Death), Queen Mary of England (catholic), Belle Gunness (norwegian-american serial killer), Mary Ann Cotton (serial killer), Ilse Koch (Lagerfrau), Katherine Knight (very bad Aussie), Elizabeth Bathory (hungarian noblewoman and serial killer), Sandra Avila Beltran (drugs), Patty Hearst (hänen isoisänsä oli lehtikeisari William Randolph Hearst. Hiän joutui kidnappauksen uhriksi, mutta pian tämän jälkeen hiän teki pankkiryöstön ja joutui vankilaan), Genene Jones (infanticide nurse), Karla Homolka (Canadian serial killer), Diane Downs (infanticide), Aileen Wuornos (serial killer), Griselda Blanco (drug lady), Lizzie Borden (kirvesmurhaaja), Bonnie Parker (bank robber), Anne Bonny (pirate), Mary Bell (pedocide), Delphine LaLaurie (serial slavekiller), Patricia Krenwinkel (Manson family member), Leslie van Houten (Manson family member), Darlie Routier (infanticide), Susan Smith (infanticide), Susan Atkins (Manson family member), Ching Shih (pirate), Anna Sorokin Delvey (con woman), Amelia Dyer (serial killer), Assata Shakur (black terrorist), Belle Gunness (serial killer), Gypsy Rose Blanchard (matricide), Pamela Smart (mariticide), Ruth Ellis (nightclub hostess, last woman hanged in UK), Phoolan Devi (bandit), Ma Barker (matriarch), Jennifer Pan (parenticide), Virginia Hill (gangster), Karla Faye Tucker (burglar, first woman injected in US), Leonarda Cianciully (serial murderer, soapmaker), Mary Read, Carill Ann Fugate (murder spree), Grace Marks (maid), Belle Starr (outlaw, friend of Lucky Luke), Zerelda Mimms (Mrs. Jesse James), Jane Toppan (serial killer), Sara Jane Moore (wannabe assassin of Gerald Ford), Martha Beck (serial killer), Doris Payne (jewel thief), Mary Brunner (Manson family member), Barbara Graham (executed by gas), Grace O'Malley (pirate), Sada Abe (jealous geisha. When they asked why she had killed Ishida, “Immediately she became excited and her eyes sparkled in a strange way: ‘I loved him so much, I wanted him all to myself. But since we were not husband and wife, as long as he lived he could be embraced by other women. I knew that if I killed him no other woman could ever touch him again, so I killed him…..’ ), Samantha Lewthwaite (white somali terrorist), Theresa Knorr (murderess), Lynette Fromme (Manson family, wannabe assassin of Gerald Ford), The Freeway Phantom (serial killer), Carol M. Bundy (serial killer), Fanny Kaplan (bolshevik revolutionary), Marguerite Alibert (Ed VII courtesan), Jean Harris (author), Linda Hazzard (physician, serial killer), Mary Jane Kelly (1st victim of Jack the Ripper), Kim Hyon-hui (North-Korean spy), Vera Renczi (serial killer), Clare Bronfman (filthy rich criminal), Kirsten Gilbert (serial killer nurse), Gerda Steinhoff (Lagerwächterin), Linda Carty (baby robber), Estella Marie Thompson (black prostitute, blowjobbed Hugh Grant), Elizabeth Becker (Lagerwächterin), Juana Barraza (asesina en serie), Olivera Circovic (baseball player, writer, jewel thief), Olga Hepnarova (mental serial killer), Sabina Eriksson (knäpp tvilling), Minnie Dean (serial killer), Madame de Brinvilliers (aristocrat parri- and fratricide), Martha Rendell (familicide, last woman hanged in Western Australia), Violet Gibson (wannabe assassin of Mussolini), Idoia López Riaño (terrorist), Styllou Christofi (murdered her daughter in law), Mary Eastley (convicted of witchcraft), Wanda Klaff (Lagerwächterin), Giulia Tofana (avvelenatrice), Tisiphone (1/3 raivottaresta), Jean Lee (murderer for money), Brigitte Mohnhaupt (RAF terrorist), Marcia (mistress of Commodus), Beate Zschäpe (far-right terrorist), Evelyn Frechette (singer, Dillingerin heila), Francoise Dior (naziaktivisti), Linda Mulhall (nirhasi äidin poikaystävän saxilla), Brigit Hogefeld (RAF terrorist), Martha Corey (Salem witchhunt victim), Marie Lafarge (arsenikkimurha), Debra Lafave (teacher, gave blow job to student), Enriqueta Marti (asasina en serie), Alse Young (witch hanging victim), Elizabeth Michael (actress, involuntary manslaughter: nasty boyfriend hit his head and died while beating her), Susannah Martin (witchcraft), Maria Mandl (Gefängnisoffizerin), Mary Frith (pickpocket and fence), Hanadi Jaradat (suicide bomber), Marie-Josephte Carrivau (mariticide), Gudrun Ensslin (RAF founder), Anna Anderson (vale-Anastasia), Ans van Dijk (jutku nazikollaboraattori), Elizabeth Holmes (bisneshuijari), Ghislaine Maxwell (Epsteinin haahka), Julianna Farrait (drugs), Yolanda Saldivar (embezzler, killer), Jodi Arias (convicted killer Jodi Ann Arias was born on July 9, 1980, in Salinas, California. In the summer of 2008, Arias made national headlines when she was charged with murdering her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander, a 30-year-old member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints who was working as a motivational speaker and insurance salesman. Aargh. Justifiable homicide.) Alyssa Bustamante (kid murder), Mary Kay Letourneau (kid abuser), Mirtha Young (drugs), Catherine Nevin (mariticide), Pilar Prades (maid), Irmgard Möller (terrorist), Christine Schürrer (krimi), Reem Riyashi (suicide bomber), Amy Fisher (jealous), Wafa Idris (suicide bomber), Jeanne de Clisson (ex-noblewoman), Christine Papin (maid murderer), Sally McNeil (body builder), Mariette Bosch (murderer), Sandra Ávila Beltrán (drugs), Alice Schwarzer (journalist), Andrea Yates (litter murderer), Mimi Wong (bar hostess), Pauline Nyiramasuhuko (criminal politician), Josefa Segovia (murderer), Martha Needle (serial killer), Antonina Makarova (war criminal), Mary Surratt (criminal businessperson), Dorothea Binz (officer), Leona Helmsley (tax evasion), Angela Rayola (reality tv personality), Léa Papin (maid murderer), Ursula Erikssson (kriminell mördare), Maria Petrovna (spree killer), Aafia Siddiqui (criminal), Fatima Bernawi (palestinian militant), La Voisin (fortune teller), Deniz Seki (singer), Rasmea Odeh (Arab activist), Hildegard Lächert (nurse), Sajida al-Rishawi (suicide bomber), Hayat Boumeddiene (ISIS groupie, nähty viimexi Al Holissa), Herta Ehlert (Lagerwächterin), Elizabeth Stride (seriös mördare), Adelheid Schulz (krimi), Jenny-Wanda Barkman (Wächter), Shi Jianqiao (pardoned assassin. The assassination of Sun Chuanfang was ethically justified as an act of filial piety and turned into a political symbol of the legitimate vengeance against the Japanese invaders.), Rosemary West (serial killer), Juana Bormann (Lagerwächterin), Kathy Boudin (criminal), Kate Webster (assassin), Teresa Lewis (murderer), Hermine Braunsteiner (Lagerwächterin), Flor Contemplacion (assassina), Constance Kent (fratricide), Tamara Samsonova (serial killer), Herta Bothe (Lagerwächterin), Maria Gruber (Mörderin), Irene Leidolf (möderin), Waltraud Wagner (Mörderin), Elaine Campione (criminelle), Greta Bösel (Pflegerin), Marie Manning (Mörderin), Darya Nikolayevna Saltykova (sadist), Nora Parham (executed), Maria Barbella (assassina), Linda Wenzel (ISIS activist), Anna Marie Hahn (Mörderin), Suzane von Richthofen (parenticide), Charlotte Mulhall (murderer), Khioniya Guseva (kriminal), Daisy de Melker (serial killer nurse), Stephanija Meyer (Mörderin), Sinedu Tadesse (murderer), Ayat al-Akhras (suicide bomber), Akosita Lavulavu (minister of infrastructure and tourism), Sabrina de Sousa (criminal diplomat), Sally Basset (poisoner), Emma Zimmer (Aufseher), Mary Clement (serial killer), Irina Gaidamachuk (serial killer), Dagmar Overbye (serialmorder), Gesche Gottfried (Mörderin), Frances Knorr (serial killer), Beate Schmidt (Serienmörderin), Elizabeth Clarke (accused victim of witchcraft), Kim Sun-ja (serial killer), Olga Konstantinovana Briscorn (serial killer), Roxana Baldetti (politico), Rizana Nafeek (house maid), Margaret Scott (accused of witchcraft), Jacqueline Sauvage (meurtrier), Veronique Courjault (tueur en série), Barbara Erni (thief), Hilde Lesewitz (Schutzstaffel Wächterin), Thenmoli Rajaratnam (suicide bomber), etc. etc..
          ellauri213.html on line 436: Sinedu Tadesse September 25, 1975 – May 28, 1995) was a junior at Harvard College who stabbed her roommate, Trang Phuong Ho, to death, then committed suicide. The incident may have resulted in a variety of changes to the administration of living conditions at Harvard. Tadesse is buried at the Ethiopian Orthodox Cemetery, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. When Tadesse entered Harvard, she earned below-average grades, and was told that this would prevent her from attending top-ranked medical schools in the U.S. She made no friends, remaining distant even from relatives she had in the area. Tadesse sent a form letter to dozens of strangers that she picked from the phone book, describing her unhappiness and pleading with them to be her friend. One woman responded to the letter but became alarmed by the bizarre writings and recordings Tadesse sent her in return; she had no further contact with Tadesse. Another woman found the letter obnoxious and sent it to a friend who worked at Harvard to review.
          ellauri214.html on line 64: In an obvious parallel with the Potter books, The Casual Vacancy is populated by a huge cast of mean, unsympathetic, small-minded folk. "This novel for adults is filled with a variety of people like Harry’s aunt and uncle, Petunia and Vernon Dursley: self-absorbed, small-minded, snobbish and judgmental folks, whose stories neither engage nor transport us.” — Michiko Kakutani, USA:n Toini Havu.
          ellauri214.html on line 66: J. K. Rowling’s first adult novel The Casual Vacancy stirred a ruckus within Sikh Community after its publication leading to the involvement of SGPC and its head showing concern with the negative portrayal of Sikh characters in the novel. Rowling defends the novel by her theory of ‘corrosive racism’ after her ‘vast amount of research’ in Sikhism. The chapter explores diasporic Sikh identity through the character of Sukhvinder who though dyslexic is stifled by her mother and harassed by her classmate Fats through slanderous remarks targeting her Sikh identity. Though Sukhvinder resorts to self-torture after undergoing racism, she emerges victorious like a brave Sikh by her self-determination and emerges a heroine by helping everybody in Britain. The chapter applies Teun A. van Dijk’s racist discourse and post-colonial theories specifically Homi Bhabha’s hybridity of cultures, Jacques Rancière’s distribution of the sensible hinting at the redistribution of identities to make invisible diaspora visible and inaudible audible and Gayatri Spivak’s theory of the subaltern to prove that the Sikh diaspora remains in Charhdi Kala (higher state of mind) even in tough situations. The chapter concludes that though British Sikh diaspora undergoes racialism leading to identity crisis, Sikhs finally find resolution through Sikh identity model Sukhvinder who, treading the footsteps of Sikh heroes like Bhai Kanhayia, becomes a heroin addict by risking her life to save Robbie and by helping all in the novel.
          ellauri214.html on line 70: In response to a Twitter post about how COVID-19 has been affecting people who menstruate, Rowling wrote, “‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”. In this post, Rowling mocks trans people by insinuating that women who do not have a period are not real women. This tweet not only offended trans women who do not have periods, but also cisgender women born with medical conditions that prevent them from having a period, older women who have gone through menapause, and transgender men who still menstrate. Rowling has continued to bash transgender people by comparing hormone therapy to gay conversion therapy and tweeting articles arguing that transitioning is a medical experiment. Many have called Rowling out on her transphobia, and some have attempted to educate her on transgender issues and the difference between sex and gender. However, the author has not been receptive to these comments, and continues to deny that she is transphobic. Rowling’s transphobia has prompted Harry Potter actors Daniel Radcliff (Harry Potter), Emma Watson (Hermionie Granger), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley), Bonnie Wright (Ginny Weasley), and Evanna Lynch (Luna Lovegood) to show their support for the transgender community. The only actor staunchly standing on her side is Tom Veladro (Voldemort). Oops, I shouldn't have said the name.
          ellauri214.html on line 72: Though Rowling’s transphobia has been publicized the most, fans have also begun to notice prejudice in her writing. Very few people of color are featured in J. K. Rowling’s books, and those that are have few lines and no detailed story arcs. One of the people of color given more thought was Cho Chang, Harry Potter’s love interest who was first introduced in the third book, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. Rowling’s racism toward Asians and lack of knowledge of Asian culture is clearly evident from just the name Cho Chang, which is a mix of Korean and Chinese surnames. Korea and China have a longstanding history as political adversaries and each country has a distinct culture. While Rowling went to great efforts in creating a wonderfully immersive wizarding world, she gave no thought to what Cho’s ethnicity is. Cho was also sorted into Ravenclaw house, the school house for those of high intelligence, playing into a common stereotype of Asians. The only other Asian characters mentioned in the series are Indian twins Padma and Pavarti Patil. While Rowling appears to have given more thought to these characters, placing Padma in Ravenclaw and breaking the Asian stereotype by placing Pavarti in Gryffindor, she ultimately fails to adequately write Asian characters. While Pavarti, as a member of Harry Potter’s house, was given more depth than Cho or her sister, many South Asian fans were irritated by the girls’ dresses in the fourth movie, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. The twins wore dull and unflattering traditional Indian attire, which many saw as a mockery of Indian culture. Cho herself wore an East Asian style dress in this movie which was a mix of different Asian styles. Rowling continued her habit of stereotyping Asians in the Fantastic Beast Movies, the first of which was released in 2016 and set in the 1920’s, several decades before the Harry Potter series. In this pre-series, the only Asian representation is displayed in the form of a woman who has been cursed to turn into a beast. Fans may remember the villain Voldemort’s pet snake, Nagini, who served him throughout the Harry Potter series. Fans were surprised to learn when watching The Crimes of Grindelwald, the second movie in the Fantastic Beasts series, that Nagini was not always a snake, but was actually a woman who had been cursed to turn into a snake. In the movie, Nagini, in human form, is caged and forced to perform in a circus. Though we do not know how Nagini came to meet Voldemort, we do know that she became his servant and the keeper of a wee snakelike portion of his soul. This is more than slightly problematic. Not only was Nagini the only Asian representation in the film, but she was also a half-human who was forced to serve an evil white man for a great part of her existence. Author Ellen Oh commented on Nagini’s inclusion in the film saying “I feel like this is the problem when white people want to diversify and don’t actually ask POC how to do so. They don’t make the connection between making Nagini an Asian woman who later on becomes the pet snake of an EEVIL whitish man.”
          ellauri214.html on line 76: J.K. Rowling has also included plenty of sexism in her writing, indicative of her internalised misogyny. Cho Chang was Harry Potter’s love interest throughout books 4 and 5. However, Cho was in a relationship with another student in the fourth book, and unfortunately this student was killed by Lord Voldemort at the end of the book. This leaves Cho rightfully distraught. Though still in emotional turmoil, she develops a crush on Harry and they begin dating. During their first kiss, Cho is crying because she is thinking of her dead boyfriend. Harry and Cho break up after multiple arguments later in the book. Later on in the series, Harry develops feelings for his best friend’s sister, Ginny Weasley. Rowling periodically writes how Harry prefers Ginny to Cho because Cho was too emotional after the death of her boyfriend. Harry preferred Ginny, who was stronger and could contain her emotions, supposedly because she had grown up with 6 brothers (no, 5, Ronny is a sissy). This comparison of the two girls demonstrates Rowling’s internalized feelings that women exist for the purpose of pleasing men. The thinly veiled idea that women who are too emotional or too much drama queens are not desirable is evident in Rowling’s writing. Fleur Delcore is another example of this feeling. Fleur is a student at a French wizarding school who competes against Harry in a difficult tournament in the fourth book. Fleur is part veela, who are magical beings of extreme beauty but can turn monstrous when angered. Fleur eventually marries Ron Weasley’s older brother, Bill. Hermionie, Harry’s other best friend, and Ginny constantly complain about Fleur. However, the only thing their animosity can be traced back to is that Fleur is a beautiful Frenchy woman and she is confident in that, whilst they are just snubnosed Brits. This further develops Rowling’s internalized misogyny. She views women who are confident in their beauty as annoying, and has the idea that women should seek male validation. Though these portions of the book were likely unintentional, speaking from personal experience, it has to be said that Rowling’s writing of women in her book have had a lasting effect on her female readers.
          ellauri214.html on line 80: The Casual Vacancy hit bookstores last week and drew mixed reviews. The Harry Potter author’s first adult book since the wizard franchise has caused some debate as it deals with such issues as child abuse, prostitution and drugs. Some British conservatives have described it as a liberal attack on their values.
          ellauri214.html on line 84: It’s difficult to imagine the phrases “miraculously unguarded vagina” or “with an ache in his heart and in his balls” being found in the G-rated wizard novels, but they abound in the X-rated Casual Vacancy. In addition to the risque descriptions, many of the characters (teens especially) are troubled and one mother is a heroine addict. “I have a lot of real-world material in me, believe you me,” Rowling tells The New Yorker. “The thing about fantasy—there are certain things you just don’t do in fantasy. You don’t have sex with unicorns.” A good rule of thumb. They are horny but much too pointy for close comfort.
          ellauri214.html on line 88: The Harry Potter series didn’t become a global phenomenon just because it was an exciting adventure, but because there was a real heart to it, characters who had both strengths and weaknesses, who struggled with their choices, much like Batman or Superman. Not so this time. Instead, “The Casual Vacancy” is a generally well-written book whose central theme is responsibility for those less fortunate, all the time imbued with ever-present British themes of class and notions of propriety.
          ellauri214.html on line 106: But, Rowling's talent is skin deep. I absolutely do not agree that she did a great job in character and/or plot development. Her characters are pretty clichéd (Chosen one and his side kick), her setting is pretty narrow (British boarding school experiences), her plot is pretty predictable, and like all amateur writers, her plot line often meanders for no good reason at all. Her world building is imaginative, but lack planning. Simply put, most part of her world is a whim, it's not coherent, she didn't think it through. And the more you think about it, the bigger the problem it is. Oh and that one character everyone is singing praises about, as if it's the best written character of all time? Stereotypical Byronic hero. I read how people praise Snape being this greatest character of our generation, I couldn't help but wondering, you guys never read Wuthering Heights?! I've never attended an American high school but I'm pretty sure the Great Gatsby is on the required reading list.
          ellauri214.html on line 154: The protagonist of the movie, who's actual family are fridged to create cheap motivation, will serves as my surrogate father or brother figure. And I will be his replacement family.
          ellauri214.html on line 161: 15 minutes into the movie, I'm entitled to know the deepest darkest most painful history of the protagonist. Because I can't trust him unless he told me everything.
          ellauri214.html on line 163: I'm entitled to be told about everything concerning current situation, every movement of the protagonist, all his plans. If he doesn't tell me everything, he's an asshole and I'm going to throw a tantrum and get myself in trouble.
          ellauri214.html on line 201: Other than the Chosen one (Harry Potter), this is my most hated character in any action movie.
          ellauri214.html on line 220: Monika Figueroa kiinnitti isokainaloonsa asekotelon ja lähti Fittangigatanille Vällingbyyhyn. Hän istui autossa ja imi pitkään joka viipaletta. Mixhän pahismiehet lähettää ämmälle haukkumasanaxi [HUORA] vaikkei se ole sexin ammattilainen? Eine lähetä äijäkolleegalle [GIGOLO] eikä [TOYBOY] vaan [HOMO]. Onko vika siinä että kohde antaa suuta muille muttei mulle?
          ellauri214.html on line 226: It supposedly originated from a conversation between the actress Lillie Langtry and the Bishop of Worcester. They were at a country house weekend party and on Sunday morning before church, they went for a stroll in the garden. On their walk, the bishop cut his finger on a rose thorn. Over lunch, Lillie enquired about his injury, asking: "How is your prick?" To which, the Bishop replied: "Throbbing", causing the butler to drop the potatoes.
          ellauri214.html on line 228: The character Wayne Campbell uses the phrase after his partner Garth says, "Hey, are you through yet? 'Cause I'm getting tired of holding this", in regard to a picture he is holding.
          ellauri214.html on line 242: In his work Bibliotheca historica (Library of History), Diodorus Siculus wrote that the Amazons came from Libya in north Africa. Diodorus’s account is set in the time of myth. He wrote that the warriors’ most famous queen was Myrina, who lived before the hero Perseus saved the Ethiopian princess Andromeda from a sea monster. Myrina led her warriors to a great number of victories, including one against the mythical island of Atlantis. Myrina led a large army of 30,000 foot-soldiers and 3,000 cavalry against the Atlanteans. Diodorus claimed that the Amazon cavalry used tactics similar to those employed by the Parthians of west Asia, who fought the Roman general Crassus (c. 115— 53 BCE), firing arrows as they rode away from their enemies. The Atlanteans eventually surrendered to Myrina after she had captured and destroyed one of their cities, enslaving and carrying away the women and the children.
          ellauri214.html on line 263: P.P.S. Joku David Crane muikeilee rasvasta kiiltävä rapuliina kaulassa: aion syyttää Putinia sotarikoxesta. Tosin niihin on syyllistyneet vähävenäläisetkin mutta niitä ei lasketa. Olen kaatanut 1 presidentin, voin tehdä sen toistekin. Kyseessä oli Liberian presidentti, musta mies jolla oli joxeenkin pienet liperit. In 2017, Crane founded the Global Accountability Network to investigate international crimes in Syria, Yemen, Venezuela, and China. In 2022, his organization published a white paper titled "Russian War Crimes Against Ukraine: The Breach of International Humanitarian Law By The Russian Federation". Mustaa valkoisella. Heppu oli US Armyn rullissa 20v uran alussa. Ezellasta.
          ellauri214.html on line 541: At 56, Tokarczuk is an invigorating presence: her black dreadlocks studded with bright blue beads, eyes rimmed with luminous turquoise. “Flights grew out of a time when I was travelling a lot,” she explains, at pains to stress how liberating this was for those raised under an oppressive communist regime. “I got my first passport in 1989, when I was 28. Wow.”
          ellauri214.html on line 547: Tokarczuk composed Flights as a “constellation novel”: a postmodern mosaic of meditations on all things in motion from travel-sized toiletries to the blood pumping through the human heart. National, emotional and temporal boundaries are crossed. Thoughts from a thoughtlessly flying semi-autobiographical narrator to Poland and the popular legend of Philippo Verheyen, the Flemish anatomist rumoured to have eaten his own amputated leg.
          ellauri214.html on line 549: This blurring of fact and fiction is intentional. Tokarczuk tells me she is often asked “Why we central Europeans don’t use a classical linear narrative, and my answer is that we don’t have such a history. Our perception is different. Poland was once a powerful imperial country that disappeared from maps of Europe for more than 100 years. It was partitioned and occupied by the Nazis and the Russians . . . We pop up and disappear and we do not trust what we are told to believe.”
          ellauri214.html on line 551: Tokarczuk felt this rejection of facts at first-hand when the Polish publication of her 2015 novel The Books of Jacob led to death threats from nationalists. Her 900-page “magnum opus” tells the true story of 18th-century Polish-Jewish religious leader Jakub Frank, who converted thousands of Orthodox Jews to a kind of Christianity that saw them condemned and persecuted for heresy.
          ellauri214.html on line 554: “I opened a history that was taboo from a number of perspectives: it was swept under the carpet by Catholics, Jews and communists. It took me eight years to research such fragile and contentious facts,” she says, “But after I won the Nike Jogging Shoe Award [Poland’s most prestigious literary prize], I was attacked by people who didn’t want to know about Poland’s dark past.” She sighs.
          ellauri216.html on line 121: Paskapuhetta. Juuri tollasta tuubaa kiertää uskovaisten aivoissa. In actual fact kaveri on jalkafetishisti, pahempi kuin Al Bundy.
          ellauri216.html on line 144: Pseudo-Dionysioksen corpus on ajoitettu liturgianhistoriallisten, dogmaattisten ja filosofisten edellytystensä vuoksi 400-luvun ja 500-luvun vaihteeseen. Tekstit on kirjoitettu aikaisintaan vuonna 475 ja viimeistään vuonna 532. Eli valehteli raukka nälissään.
          ellauri216.html on line 146: Pseudo-Dionysios kirjoittaa dogmihistoriallisessa tilanteessa, jossa keisari Zenonin Henoticon yritti saada aikaan sovinnon Khalkedonin konsiilin kaksiluonto-oppia kannattavien ja monofysitismiä kannattavien välille. Akateemisessa tutkimuksessa ei ole yksimielisyyttä siitä, onko Dionysios itse monofysitismin kannattaja vai ei; ehkä yleisimmän näkökulman mukaan hänen on katsottu kuuluvan joukkoon, joka pyrki aikaansaamaan sovinnon kiistelevien osapuolten välille. Eli siis oliko Jesse vain ihminen niikö Spartacus vai oliko se joku puolijumala. Paljon väliä.
          ellauri216.html on line 167: Proclus’ own interests are purely metaphysical: his task is to explain how evil fits into the scheme of things, how its existence squares with the omnipotence and all-pervading presence of the Good God, how it comes about and what its ontological status is. All of these questions are undoubtedly important, and I do not mean to belittle them.
          ellauri216.html on line 172: To become evil means to fail to reach this perfection, to deviate from one’s nature. Evil thus has no positive existence of itself. It is a failure having no reality of its own, being but an incidental perversion of something good.
          ellauri216.html on line 174: To capture this particular mode of existence, Proclus uses the term parhypostasis, ‘parasitical existence’—i.e. an existence that has no proper antecedent cause, but arises accidentally in consequence of an unfortunate interaction of a number of partial causes, each of them having the best intentions only.
          ellauri216.html on line 198: The Didache (Greek: Διδαχή, translit. Didakhé, lit. "Teaching"), also known as The Lord's Teaching Through the Twelve Apostles to the Nations (Διδαχὴ Κυρίου διὰ τῶν δώδεκα ἀποστόλων τοῖς ἔθνεσιν), is a brief anonymous early Christian treatise written in Koine Greek, dated by modern scholars to the first or (less commonly) second century AD. The first line of this treatise is "The teaching of the Lord to the Gentiles (or Nations) by the twelve apostles". The text, parts of which constitute the oldest extant written catechism, has three main sections dealing with Christian ethics, rituals such as baptism and Eucharist, and Church organization. The opening chapters describe the virtuous Way of Life and the wicked Way of Death. The Lord's Prayer is included in full. Baptism is by immersion, or by affusion if immersion is not practical. Fasting is ordered for Wednesdays and Fridays. Two primitive Eucharistic prayers are given. Church organization was at an early stage of development. Itinerant apostles and prophets are important, serving as "chief priests" and possibly celebrating the Eucharist. Meanwhile, local bishops and deacons also have authority and seem to be taking the place of the itinerant ministry.
          ellauri216.html on line 305: Syystä äiti kauhistui kun vanhan päivän elättäjä ja lastenlasten in spe isä käärii siittimensä naftaliiniin ja lähtee miesten kanssa keijaan haisemaan kyrvät kitkerästi käryten. Mitä tuli tehtyä näin väärin pojan kasvatuxessa?
          ellauri216.html on line 320: Painter Grigory Ostrovsky was active in Soligalich; the only paintings known to be by his hand are currently held in the town´s regional museum. There is a monument to Gennady Nevelskoy, who was born in the vicinity. Publisher Ivan Sytin was born in Soligalichsky District. Imugeeni Haritonia ei edes mainita.
          ellauri216.html on line 346: Nykyaikaisten historioitsijoiden tutkimusten vahvistaman legendan mukaan kuvailtuna aikana Feodorovskaja-ikonista tuli pyhän oikeistoon uskovan suurruhtinas Aleksanteri Nevskin rukouskuva, ja juuri tällä kuvakkeella vuonna 1239 suurruhtinas Jaroslav Vsevolodovich siunasi hänen poikansa, pyhä prinssi Aleksanteri, naimisiin Polotskin prinsessa Paraskevan kanssa. Yhdessä jalon prinssin kanssa Feodorovskajan ikoni matkusti laumaan, jossa pyhä Aleksanteri puolusti Venäjän maan etuja; hän otti tämän kuvan Kaikkein Pyhästä Theotokosista mukaansa sotilaskampanjoihin; Jumalanäidin Feodorovskajan ikonin edessä jalo ruhtinas, hyväksynyt luostaruuden, päätti elämänsä.
          ellauri216.html on line 357: Kirkon vainon vuosina 1900-luvulla, ihmeellinen Feodorovskaya-kuvake Pyhästä Theotokosista ei poistunut temppelin seinistä, vaan se säilytettiin kirkon pyhäkkönä. Kun otetaan huomioon ikonin henkinen ja kulttuurinen arvo ja merkitys ortodoksiselle, tämä tapaus on ainutlaatuinen Venäjän ortodoksisen kirkon lähihistoriassa. Vuodesta 1991 lähtien ihmeellistä kuvaa on säilytetty Kostroman loppiaisen-Anastasian katedraalissa (). Vuodesta 1991 lähtien on myös pidetty kronikkaa nykyaikaisista ihmeistä, jotka on suoritettu rukousten kautta Feodorovskajan ikonin luona; Tähän mennessä on tallennettu yli 100 tällaista tapahtumaa.
          ellauri216.html on line 368: Venäjällä monet bysanttilaista alkuperää olevat ikonit saivat oman historiansa, täynnä ihmeitä, historiallisia voittoja, tragedioita. Tällainen on Feodorovskaya-kuvake, joka kuvan tyypin mukaan viittaa "armolliseen". Hänen suojeluksensa ei rajoitu tiettyihin tapauksiin - se on todella kansallinen pyhäkkö. Häntä käytetään suojelijana vihollisilta, tulisijan suojelijaksi suruissa ja vaikeuksissa.
          ellauri216.html on line 403: Pyhäkkö liittyy läheisesti Venäjän historiaan, mutta sitä pidetään myös ihmeenä. Kaksi kertaa temppelit, joissa kuva sijaitsi, tuhoutuivat täysin tulipalossa, mutta siitä huolimatta se säilyi ehjänä. Toinen suuri ihme paljastettiin taistelussa tataareja vastaan. Kostromaa ympäröivät viholliset eivät kestäneet sitä säteilyä, joka alkoi virrata Jumalan Äidin kasvoista.
          ellauri216.html on line 447: 1900-luvun alun kauheat tapahtumat eivät ohittaneet Kostromaa. Jumalan Providence säilytti kuitenkin Venäjän maan suuren pyhäkön. Ikoni ei vain välttynyt teomakistien häpäisyltä, vaan myös pysyi kirkoissa koko 1900-luvun. On huomattava, että ottaen huomioon ihmeellisen "Fedorovskaya"-kuvakkeen henkisen ja kulttuurisen arvon ja sen historiallisen yhteyden Romanovien kuninkaalliseen taloon, tämä tapaus on ainutlaatuinen kirkon lähihistoriassa.
          ellauri216.html on line 449: Joulukuun alussa 1919 Kostromassa tutkittiin ihmeellistä Jumalanäidin kuvaa Koulutuksen kansankomissariaatin museoosaston tutkimusmatkalla I.E.:n johdolla. Tartu, jotta alkuperäinen maalikerros paljastuu. Mutta toisin kuin muut taidehistorioitsijoiden huomion kohteeksi tulleet ikonit, Kostroman pyhäkkö ei poistunut kirkon seinistä moniin vuosiin.
          ellauri216.html on line 541: Jumalankantajaisä Makarios syntyi Egyptin suistomaa-alueen kylässä vuoden 300 tienoilla. Nuoruudessaan hän työskenteli kamelinajajana. Jumala kutsui häntä kuitenkin toisenlaiseen elämään ja Makarios vastasi kutsuun kuuliaisesti. Hän vetäytyi kylässään keljaan ja aloitti yksinäisen rukous- ja paastokilvoituksen. Kun ihmiset tahtoivat tehdä hänestä papin, hän pakeni toiseen kylään. Siellä raskaaksi tullut tyttö alkoi syyttää Makariosta häpäisemisestään. Makarios otettiin kiinni ja häntä raahattiin pitkin katua. Häntä lyötiin ja solvattiin, mutta hän ei sanonut sanaakaan puolustaakseen itseään vaan päinvastoin lupasi tehdä työtä hankkiakseen elatuksen naiselle ja lapselle. Makarios piti tilannetta Jumalan lähettämänä. Hän oli tuolloin noin 30 vuoden ikäinen. Kun Makarioksen syyttömyys tuli aikanaan ilmi, kylän väki lähti joukolla hänen luokseen pyytämään anteeksi. Mitenkä totuus tuli ilmi? No, when the woman's delivery drew near, her labor became exceedingly difficult. She did not manage to give birth until she confessed Macarius's innocence. She confessed that she had slandered the hermit, and revealed the name of the real father. (Who was it?) A multitude of people then came asking for his forgiveness, but he fled to the Nitrian Desert to escape all mundane glory.
          ellauri216.html on line 552: Makarios lived only on his pulse and one bottle of lamp oil a year. Many fathers testified that his face used to glow in the dark; and thus appeared his name as “the glowing lantern.”
          ellauri216.html on line 699: Skeemalla on alun perin tarkoitettu munkin kaavun päälle laitettavaa, esiliinan kaltaista asustetta, joskus sillä on tarkoitettu koko munkin asua. Kyseiseen esiliinan kaltaiseen vaatteeseen on kuvattu Kristuksen kiduttamiseen käytetyt välineet ja ilmeisesti toisinaan munkkeuden historiassa on tavattu skeemamunkkeja, jotka ovat myös itse kantaneet erilaisia kidutusrautoja ja ristejä ruumiiseensa sidottuina. Nykyisin tällaisia ei enää juuri näe.
          ellauri216.html on line 788: Pelastusmiehistö on aivan Rizan oven edessä. Pelastustie, pysäköinti oven eteen kielletty. Junailija varjelkoon meitä oppineilta miehiltä. Sisälukutaidosta on pelkkää harmia. Noviisin ei pidä päästää ymmärrystä sydämeen, siitä tulee sille kovaa lihanhimoa ja jättimäinen kepitys. Isä Agapikin huomaa sen tunnustelemalla vaikkon umpisokea.
          ellauri216.html on line 790: Uuden Valamon vetäjänä Haritonia vaivaa mala fides. Se jättää vasitenkin vanhan tyylin surffaajat flunssaisina kitumaan Kantokoskelle, good riddance for bad rubbish, riitapukarit. Ja sitten on pahastuvinaan when they call his bluff. Vitun pelle.
          ellauri216.html on line 980: Tuhoisimpien, 4.2.1940 tapahtuneiden pommitusten jälkeen munkeista poistuivat igumeeni Haritonin johdolla vuorokauden kestäneen ankaran ilmapommituksen jälkeen. Luostarin vanhukset kuljetettiin yötä myöten kuorma-autolla Lahdenpohjaan ja sieltä edelleen Suolahden kautta Kannonkoskelle. Evakkomatkan aikana kymmenesosa munkeista kuoli. Tämä oli yksi monista evakuoinneista luostarin historian aikana, mutta nyt evakkomatka suuntautui ensi kertaa länteen.
          ellauri216.html on line 1050: Valaamin luostarin suhteellisen luotettava dokumentaarinen historia alkaa 1300-luvulta. Valaamin luostari mainitaan Solovetskin Savvatyn elämässä. Teoksen Valaamin luostarin perustamisvuosi on 1407.
          ellauri216.html on line 1067: 1700-luvun lopulla Valaamin luostarissa työskenteli kuvanveistäjä Kondraty Konyagin, joka tunnettiin töistään Ostashkovin kirkoissa ja Nilo-Stolobenskajan autiomaassa, jolle nykyaikaiset taidehistorioitsijat pitävät kunnioitettua munkin ihmekuvana (Stolobenskyn nolla).
          ellauri216.html on line 1111: Vuoteen 1940 asti Valaam oli pieni "munkkien valtio" - obskurantisteja, riistäjiä, pankkiireja, sitten - vakoojia ja sabotöörejä, kansainvälisen vastavallankumouksen etuvartio Neuvostoliiton rajalla. Tämä "valtio" oli pinta-alaltaan 30 kertaa suurempi kuin Vatikaani - paavin "valtio", kaksi kertaa suurempi kuin Monacon ruhtinaskunta - osa feodaalista Eurooppaa. Ja Valaam munkkien tulot olivat neljä kertaa suuremmat kuin Monacon ruhtinaskunnan tulot. Miljajev totesi, että "koko Valaamin historia 1918-1940. on tarina Neuvostoliiton vastaisesta etuvartiosta Neuvostoliiton luoteisrajoilla". Miljajev valitsi luostarin kirjastosta 1 191 kirjaa vientiin Neuvostoliittoon, mutta ennen Suuren isänmaallisen sodan alkua kaikkia ei viety.
          ellauri217.html on line 63: The story recreates the interlinked history of the three monotheistic Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), allegorised against the setting of an imaginary 19th century Cairene alley.
          ellauri217.html on line 65: Critics claimed that Gabalawi stands for God. Mahfouz rejected this to avoid fatwa saying that Alp-Öhi stood for "a certain idea of God that men have made" and that "Nothing can represent God. God is not like anything else. God is gigantic." Kiemurteli kuin mato koukussa. Tai sit vuorenpeikko olis yxinkertaisesti Abraham, se mamu Irakista? Joka pani paxuxi muka-siskonsa? Ja toisen kerran ruiski Iisakin vielä satavuotiaana jugurttimainoxena? Hizi mixei mun letku ollut niin kestävä. Alexi Laihon haudalla on texti: tässä lepää paarma. Mun letkun kivessä lukee: tässä lepää toukka. Turhaan odotan sen ylösnousemuksen hetkeä.
          ellauri217.html on line 69: Central to the plot are the futuwwat (strongmen) who control the alley and exact protection money from the people. The successive heroes overthrow the strongmen of their time, but in the next generation new strongmen spring up and things are as bad as ever. Arafat tries to use his knowledge of explosives to destroy the strongmen, but his attempts to discover Gabalawi's secrets leads to the death of the old man (though he does not directly kill him). The Chief Strongman guesses the truth and blackmails Arafat into helping him to become the dictator of the whole Alley. The book ends, after the murder of Arafat, with his friend searching in a rubbish tip for the book in which Arafat wrote his secrets. The people say "Oppression must cease as night yields to day. We shall see the end of tyranny and the dawn of miracles." Haha, night follows day as surely as the other way round, and night wins out in the end. Valot sammuu, haju jää.
          ellauri217.html on line 71: It was this book that earned Naguib Mahfouz condemnation from Omar Abdel-Rahman in 1989, who called on him to repent or be killed, Abdel-Rahman also claimed that "If this sentence had been passed on Naguib Mahfouz when he wrote Children of the Alley, Salman Rushdie would have realized that he had to stay within bounds" after the Nobel Prize had revived interest in it. As a result, in 1994 – a day after the anniversary of the prize – Mahfouz was attacked and stabbed in the neck by two extremists outside his Cairo home. Mahfouz survived the attack, yet he suffered from its consequences until his death in 2006. Salman sai myös luovuttaa silmän silmästä loppupeleissä, yhtä tyhmänä kuin Daabas. Silmäpuoli Sinbad merenkulkija, Popeye the sailor man!
          ellauri217.html on line 101: “You are optimistic, inspiring, outgoing, and expressive. People see you as cheerful, positive and charming; your personality has a certain bounce and verve that so powerfully affects others that you can inspire people without effort. All of this upward energy is a symptom of your tremendous creativity. Your verbal skills may well lead you into the fields of writing, comedy, theater, and music.”
          ellauri217.html on line 105: “You are a stimulating person. You brighten social gatherings with your flesh and original ideas. Your conversation tends to be sprinkled with novelty and wit. You have a quick tongue and charisma. You are probably an excellent salesman. There is a lot of nervous energy within you looking for an outlet. You love your freedom and you see this life as an ongoing adventure. You are upbeat and optimistic.”
          ellauri217.html on line 135: Kaikki profeetta Muhammedia koskevat tiedot ovat peräisin kahdesta tekstilähteestä. Niistä ensimmäinen on Ibn Ishaqin (k. 767) abbasidikalifaatin pääkaupungissa Bagdadissa kirjoittama Sirat Rasul Allah eli "Jumalan lähettilään elämäkerta". Teos on kirjoitettu yli sata vuotta Muhammedin ilmoitetun kuolinvuoden jälkeen. Se perustuu suullisiin tarinoihin, joita Ibn Ishaq kokosi etenkin kalifaatin sotilasleireistä kaljatuopin äärestä. Teos seuraa kronologisesti Muhammedin elämää syntymästä kuolemaan, mutta sisältää myös laajemman kuvauksen maailman luomisesta ja profeettojen ykkosketjusta läpi ihmiskunnan historian. Kirja on päässyt hukkumaan, mutta sen sisältö on voitu onnexi ennallistaa useista lähteistä. Niistä tärkeimmät ovat Ibn Hishamin (k. 834) 800-luvun alussa kirjoittama Muhammedin elämäkerta ja al-Tabarin (k. 922) 900-luvun alussa kirjoittama historiikki. Nämä teokset ovat islamin pyhää historiaa, jota ei voi kyseenalaistaa menettämättä turbaanin mukana myös päätänsä.
          ellauri217.html on line 139: Hadithien epäluotettavuus historiallisena tietolähteenä alkoi valjeta eurooppalaisille tutkijoille vasta 1800-luvun kuluessa. Vuonna 1890 Ignaz Goldziher päätyi lopulta arvioimaan, ettei yksikään hadith täyttänyt tieteellisen tiedon vaatimuksia. Muslimit puolestaan uskovat, että Koraani on peräisin profeetta Muhammedin elinajalta ja kertoo luotettavana aikalaislähteenä hänen elämästään. Länsimaiset tutkijat uskottelevat, että Muhammedin elämäkertaa on päinvastoin kirjoitettu islamissa niin, että Koraanin eri lauseiden ympärille on rakennettu kohtauksia Muhammedin sexielämästä. Tästä tafsauskirjallisuudesta esimerkin antaa Koraanin jae 9:65 "Me laskimme vain leikkiä". Koko kirja on vaan iso läppä, kuin Veikko Huovisen Veitikka.
          ellauri217.html on line 156: 900-luvulla kirjoittaneen al-Tabarin mukaan Muhammed syntyi vuonna 567, 569 tai 572. Tai size oli 579. Vakiintuneimman perimätiedon mukaan Muhammed syntyi rabbi-kuun 12. päivänä vuonna 570. Mekassa Arabian autiomaassa Mekan mahtavimpaan Quraish-heimoon kuuluvaan klaaniin. Mekka sijaitsee vuorten ympäröimässä karussa laaksossa Länsi-Arabiassa Hijazin alueella. Islamilaisten lähteiden mukaan Mekka oli niemimaan länsiosan tärkein vaikka köyhin kauppakeskus. Ibn Hishamin kuvauksen mukaan se oli ahdas ja köyhä kaupunki. Siellä sijaitsi Kaaban temppeli, arabien tärkein pakanallinen palvontapaikka, jonka oli rakentanut Abraham. Mekasta tai Quraish-heimosta ei ole löytynyt historiallisia tietoja ennen 800-lukua, joten myös varhaiset tiedot Mekasta ovat lähinnä vain islamin tekopyhää historiaa. Ibn Hishamin mukaan mekkalaiset kuvailivat kaupunkiaan seuraavasti: "me asumme mitä ahtaimmassa kaupungissa ja meillä on vain vähän vettä ja niukka elanto." Muhammedin luonteesta Hisham kirjoittaa: "Kun hän kasvoi mieheksi, hän oli ylevyytensä ja jaloutensa ansiosta hyveellisin kansastaan, paras tavoiltaan, jaloin teoiltaan, paras naapurina, lempein, totuudenmukaisin, luotettavin ja kauimpana siveettömyydestä ja tavoista, jotka alentavat miehen." Supermäntä oli selkeästi tekeillä. Ja toisin kuin Rifaa, tällä kaverilla mäntä toimi jopa sakkolihassa.
          ellauri217.html on line 169: Muhammed sai aluksi suojelua omalta heimoltaan, jonka johtaja oli Muhammedin setä Abu Talib. Tämä ei kääntynyt islaminuskoon, mutta suojeli hölmöä veljenpoikaansa. Muhammed keräsi sanomalleen kannattajia varsinkin köyhien joukosta, jotka tulivat kuulolle ilmaisen lounaan toivossa. Muhammedin lähisukulaisista islaminuskoon kääntyi Muhammedin veljenpoika ja tuleva neljäs kalifi Ali ibn Abi Talib. Talibaani abi.
          ellauri217.html on line 225: Hetkinen, Muhammedin muori oli tuskin neljääkymmentä, miten ne muuten oisi ehtineet bylsiä sitä määrää lapsia? Tai bylsiä kylläkin, siinä ei kauan nokka tuhise varsinkaan täydellä kassilla, mutta odotuxet ovat pitkiä. Kassi oli varmaan läski kun se sai tupla illallisia.
          ellauri217.html on line 234: Mikä vaivaa kassia, se on kuin pieru exyxissä. He sighed pointing to his balls: I have a big secret here, too heavy to bear alone.
          ellauri217.html on line 256: Yasser Arafat olikin egyptiläinen ellen väärin muista mokkeri Steinbockin kirjasta. No helkkari, se oli palestiinalainen Gazasta! Tyypillistä farisealaista vääristelyä. Tässä se on Harry Potter tyyppinen velho eli peikkomies. Ilmeisesti niinkö tiedemies. Jaaha, nyt marssitetaan sadun misu esille, nätti vaikka huppu päällä toistaisexi. Pitää popup kahvilaa tossa vastapäätä. Nimi oli Ratafia, Fittavaan tai jotain sellasta. Se ei nyt ole niin tärkeetä. Arafat tahtoo selata luonnon suurta kirjaa niin kauan kun virsikirjan kannet ovat auki. Endoscopy fuck the pussy, to get the cervix point of view. It´s not strange for a bastard to look with all his force for an ancestor. Jöns-setä on tästä esimerkkinä.
          ellauri217.html on line 260: Älkää spoilatko, tää on hieno päivä ärjyi Saddam. Jumala on kuollut, se lainas Nietzscheä. Arafat kävi seuraavaxi nirhaamassa sen jumalan puolesta. Onko Yasser ehkä kopsannut Nobelin kexinnön: dynamiittipötkön? Nitroglyseriini tunnettiin, Alfred kexi tehdä siitä turvallista savella. Arafat put a spotted dick on his head and went to see the Trustee. Trusteen nimi oli Katri-Helena. Kirjamies ja lavatähti kohtaavat. Mikä sai sinut pettämään kansan asian? No salamiakki! Ei kyllä se paukkupullo oli ydinpommi mieluummin, kun ottaa huomioon tän bühleinin ajoituxen.
          ellauri217.html on line 262: Trustee Kadri-Helena onkin varmaan se ketku jutku Ben Gurion tms joka sai atomipommin teko-ohjeen heimoveljiltä jenkeistä. Israel's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion was "nearly obsessed" with obtaining nuclear weapons to prevent the Holocaust from reoccurring. He stated, "What Einstein, Oppenheimer, and Teller, the three of them are Jews, made for the United States, could also be done by scientists in Israel, for their own people". Deborah Brand 3 Aug 2022 0 2:04 Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid said this week Israel has "other capabilities" against threats from Iran, in a rare allusion to the country's widely reported nuclear stockpile.
          ellauri217.html on line 280: Mihkä herra kaikkivoipana edes tarvitsee tota uskontunnustuksen voutseria? No ei se tarvitsekaan ize ehkä, mutta kaikki maailman Calle Roseniuxet tarvitsevat niitä, pitääxeen kirjaa lauman pääluvusta. Sillä vaikka lisäxi tulevat muut hyvät teot kuten Roseniusten ruokinta on valinnaisia, niin armahduxesta helpottunut kaveri maxaa aivan mielellään. Sillä on nyt perstaskussa uusi elämä, se ei ole köyhä eikä kipeä, se antaa vähästään kuin köyhä leski eikä pihistä. Parannus tulee näin niinkuin jälkijunassa, se ei ole ehto mutta välttämätön seuraus: muuten ei ollut usko oikea eikä anteexipyyntö vilpitön.
          ellauri217.html on line 544: Tulipalo aluksen konehuoneessa. Miehistö sai palon nopeasti sammutettua. Laivalta evakuoitiin 240 henkilöä.
          ellauri217.html on line 595: Majoituslaivana Sochissa Olympialaisten ajan.
          ellauri217.html on line 628: Pastori sai sairaalan avajaisissa rauhoittavan ruiskeen ylihoitajalta eikä kääntäen. Freskossa on samlagsskenejä, gruppsexhistorioita ja eroottisia ansseja. Aika frekkiä. Chicklit kirjat päättyy yleensä tälläseen ylenpalttiseen julkiseen menestysskeneen, jota seuraa ruhtinaallinen pano voittaneelta koiraalta. Tässä tapauxessa voittaja on yhtä auki kuin Oskun Arafatilla.
          ellauri217.html on line 639: The five precepts (Sanskrit: pañcaśīla; Pali: pañcasīla) or five rules of training (Sanskrit: pañcaśikṣapada; Pali: pañcasikkhapada) is the most important system of morality for Buddhist lay people. They constitute the basic code of ethics to be respected by lay followers of Buddhism. The precepts are commitments to abstain from killing living beings, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying and intoxication.
          ellauri217.html on line 647: According to modern Jewish law, non-Jews (gentiles) are not obligated to convert to Judaism, but they are required to observe the Seven Laws of Noah to be assured of a place in the World to Come (Olam Ha-Ba), the final reward of the righteous.The non-Jews that choose to follow the Seven Laws of Noah are regarded as "Righteous Gentiles" (Hebrew: חסידי אומות העולם, Chassiddei Umot ha-Olam: "Pious People of the World"). This is what Israel is enforcing on the West Bank and Gaza currently. The balls are in their court now, warn the Jews.
          ellauri217.html on line 680: According to the Genesis flood narrative, a deluge covered the whole world on account of violent corruption on the earth, killing every surface-dwelling creature except Noah, his wife, his sons, their wives, and the animals taken aboard the Ark. According to the biblical narrative, all modern humans are descendants of Noah, thus the name Noahide Laws refers to the laws that apply to all of humanity. After the Flood, God sealed a covenant with Noah with just the following 2 admonitions as written in Genesis 9:4-6.
          ellauri217.html on line 684: Murder: "Furthermore, I will demand your blood, for [the taking of] your lives, I shall demand it [even] from any wild animal. From man too, I will demand of each person's brother the blood of man. He who spills the blood of man, by man his blood shall be spilt; for in the image of God He made man." (9:5–6)
          ellauri217.html on line 687: Hammurabi style, murder is paid back with death sentence, or else. A little unjustly, this concerns also animals as murderers, but not as victims.
          ellauri217.html on line 696: In the history of Christianity, the Apostolic Decree recorded in Acts 15 is commonly seen as a parallel to the Seven Laws of Noah. However, modern scholars dispute the connection between Acts 15 and the Noahide laws. The Apostolic Decree is still observed by the Eastern Orthodox Church and includes some food restrictions.
          ellauri217.html on line 702: Accounts of the council are found in Acts of the Apostles chapter 15 (in two different forms, the Alexandrian and Western versions) and also possibly in Paul´s letter to the Galatians (chapter 2). Some scholars dispute that Galatians 2 is about the Council of Jerusalem, while others have defended this identification.
          ellauri217.html on line 709: The primary issue which was addressed related to the requirement of circumcision, as the author of Acts relates, but other important matters arose as well, as the Apostolic Decree indicates. The dispute was between those, such as the followers of the "Pillars of the Church", led by Jeeves The Just (eikä melkein), who believed, following his interpretation of the Great Commission, that the church must observe the Torah, i.e. the rules of traditional Judaism, and Paul the Apostle, who believed there was no such necessity. The main concern for the Apostle Paul, which he subsequently expressed in greater detail with his letters directed to the early Christian communities in Asia Minor, was the inclusion of Gentiles into God´s newest Covenant, sending the message that faith in Christ is sufficient for salvation. (See also Supersessionism, New Covenant, Antinomianism, Hellenistic Judaism, and Paul the Apostle and Judaism).
          ellauri217.html on line 711: At the council, following advice offered by Simon Peter (Acts 15:7–11 and Acts 15:14), Barnabas and Paul gave an account of their ministry among the gentiles (Acts 15:12), and the apostle James quoted from the words of the prophet Amos (Acts 15:16–17, quoting Amos 9:11–12). James added his own words to the quotation: "Known to God from eternity are all His works" and then submitted a proposal, which was accepted by the Church and became known as the Apostolic Decree:
          ellauri217.html on line 730: Rebbe Emden, in a remarkable apology for Christianity contained in his appendix to "Seder 'Olam" (pp. 32b-34b, Hamburg, 1752), gives it as his opinion that the original intention of Jesus, and especially of Paul, was to convert only the Gentiles to the seven moral laws of Noah and to let the Jews follow the Mosaic law—which explains the apparent contradictions in the New Testament regarding the laws of Moses and the Sabbath.
          ellauri219.html on line 143:

        • Mahatma Gandhi was planned for this position, but was deleted prior to publication
          ellauri219.html on line 161: A hugely prolific occultist and author who formed his own religion, Thelema, Crowley’s central tenet was, “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Love is the law, love under will.”
          ellauri219.html on line 180: The next day Jacot-Guillarmod and De Righi attempted to depose Crowley from expedition leadership. The argument could not be settled, and Jacot-Guillarmod, De Righi, and Pache decided to retreat from Camp V to Camp III. At 5 pm they left with four porters on a single rope, but a fall precipitated an avalanche that killed three porters as well as Alexis Pache. People in Camp V heard "frantic cries" and Reymond immediately descended to help, but Crowley stayed in his tent. That evening he wrote a letter to a Darjeeling newspaper stating that he had advised against the descent and that "a mountain 'accident' of this sort is one of the things for which I have no sympathy whatever". The next day Crowley passed the site of the accident without pausing nor speaking to the survivors and left on his own to Darjeeling, where he took the expedition funds, which mostly had been paid by Jacot-Guillarmod. The latter would get at least some of his money back after threatening to make public some of Crowley's pornographic poetry.
          ellauri219.html on line 183: Crowley gained widespread notoriety during his lifetime, being a recreational drug user, bisexual, and an individualist social critic. Crowley has remained a highly influential figure over Western esotericism and the counterculture of the 1960s, and continues to be considered a prophet in Thelema. He is the subject of various biographies and academic studies.
          ellauri219.html on line 194: Leonard Alfred Schneider (October 13, 1925 – August 3, 1966), known professionally as Lenny Bruce, was an American stand-up comedian, social critic, and satirist. Samanikäinen kuin Tony Curtis, ja samanlainen vale-anglosaxi, Levantin kuomuneniä kumpikin. He was renowned for his open, free-wheeling, and critical style of comedy which contained satire, politics, religion, sex, and vulgarity. His 1964 conviction in an obscenity trial was followed by a posthumous pardon in 2003. Saat anteexi, mutta älä enää koskaan niin tee.
          ellauri219.html on line 196: His parents divorced before he was 10, and he lived with various relatives over the next decade. His British-born father, Myron (Mickey) Schneider, was a shoe clerk; they saw each other very infrequently. His mother, Sally Marr (legal name Sadie Schneider, born Sadie Kitchenberg), was a stage performer and dancer and had an enormous influence on Bruce's career. He defiantly convinced his ship's medical officer that he was experiencing homosexual urges toward him, leading to his dishonorable discharge in July 1945. However, he had not admitted to or been found guilty of any breach of naval regulations, and successfully applied to change his discharge to "Under Honorable Conditions ... by reason of unsuitability for the naval service". At Hanson's diner Bruce met Joe Anjovis (named by his taste) who had a profound influence on Bruce's approach to comedy.
          ellauri219.html on line 198: Branded a "sick comic", Bruce was essentially blacklisted from television, and when he did appear, thanks to sympathetic fans like Hefner and Steve Allen, it was with great concessions to Broadcast Standards and Practices. Jokes that might offend, like an extremely boring routine on airplane-glue-sniffing teenagers that was done live for The Steve Allen Show in 1959, had to be typed out and pre-approved by network officials. On his debut on Allen's show, Bruce made an unscripted comment on the recent marriage of Elizabeth Taylor to Eddie Fisher, wondering, "Will Elizabeth Taylor become bat mitzvahed?"
          ellauri219.html on line 200: Horny and Lenny had a tumultuous relationship. Many serious domestic incidents occurred between them, usually the result of serious drug use. His greatest fear was getting his act down pat. On this night, he rose to every chance stimulus, every interruption and noise and distraction, with a mad volleying of mental images that suggested the fantastic riches of Charlie Parker's horn. Like the Bird's, his show got gradually only worse.
          ellauri219.html on line 202: On October 4, 1961, Bruce was arrested for obscenity at the Jazz Workshop in San Francisco, where he had used the word "cocksucker", and "he probably can't come". Although the jury acquitted him, other law enforcement agencies began monitoring his appearances, resulting in frequent arrests under obscenity charges.
          ellauri219.html on line 207: Bruce was arrested again in West Hollywood. The charge this time was that the comedian had used the word "schmuck", an insulting Yiddish word that was also considered a term for "penis". In April the next year he was barred from entering the United Kingdom by the Home Office as an "undesirable alien".
          ellauri219.html on line 209: An all-male panel presided over his widely publicized six-month trial, Bruce and Howard Solomon were found guilty of obscenity on November 4, 1964. The conviction was announced despite positive testimony and petitions of support from—among other obscene artists, writers and educators — Woody Allen, Bob Dylan, Jules Feiffer, Allen Ginsberg, Norman Mailer, William Styron, and James Baldwin, and Manhattan journalist and television personality Dorothy Kilgallen and sociologist Herbert Gans. Bruce was sentenced on December 21, 1964, to four months in dryhouse (suivahuone); he was set free on bail during the appeals process and died before the appeal was decided, just like Master Eckehart.
          ellauri219.html on line 231: In contrast to Mae West (No.3), Fred Astaire was reportedly thrilled to be asked to appear on the Sgt Pepper album cover. A child star who initially started dancing with his sister on stage, it was with Ginger Rogers that Fred made his greatest mark, in a series of classic Golden Age movies including Top Hat and Swing Time. He also appeared with John and Yoko in the 1972 television film Imagine. Limainen mafioso luikero.
          ellauri219.html on line 236: Born in 1938, American painter and illustrator Richard Merkin was enamored with the early jazz period that flourished in the years before his birth. His modernist style matched the abstraction of jazz music, and also inspired Peter Blake’s tribute artwork, Souvenirs For Richard Merkin, created in 1966.
          ellauri219.html on line 250: Along with Huntz Hall (No.13), Leo Gorcey was one of The Bowery Boys, a group of on-screen hoodlums who grew out of The Dead End Kids and The East Side Kids. Their movie franchise ran throughout the 40s and 50s, and totaled 48 films. As the gang’s leader, Gorcey was a prototype street thug who set the template for many to follow, though he refused to let The Beatles use his image unless they paid him a fee, which was declined.
          ellauri219.html on line 260: Born in Italy in 1870, Simon Rodia emigrated to the United States with his brother when he was 15. Living in various places for the next 35 years, Rodia finally settled in the Watts district of Los Angeles in 1920, and began constructing the Watts Towers the following year. Consisting of 17 interconnected sculptures, the project took Rodia 33 years to complete.
          ellauri219.html on line 275: A founder of the modern Conservative Party, Sir Robert Peel served as the UK’s Prime Minister on two separate occasions, 1834-35 and 1841-46. While he served as the UK’s Home Secretary, Peel also helped form the modern police force – and his name is still evoked today, with the terms “bobbies” and “peelers” referring to policemen in England and Ireland, respectively.
          ellauri219.html on line 300: Striking and versatile, Tony Curtis was a Hollywood idol who made a dizzying amount of movies (over 100) between 1949 and 2008. He will always be remembered for his role alongside Jack Lemmon and Marilyn Monroe (No.25) in the 1959 cross-dressing caper Some Like It Hot, but another stand-out remains his performance alongside Burt Lancaster as fast-talking press agent Sidney Falco in the 1957 film noir The Sweet Smell Of Success. Tässä jää nyt mainizematta Veijareita ja pyhimyksiä (The Persuaders!), ITC Entertainmentin 1970–1971 tuottama televisiosarja. Sen pääosissa esiintyivät Tony Curtis (Danny Wilde) ja Roger Moore (lordi Brett Sinclair; koko nimi Brett Rupert George Robert Andrew Sinclair, Marnockin 15. jaarli). Sitä tehtiin 24 jaksoa. Tony ja Roger eivät voineet sietää toisiaan. Läskiintynyt Tony kuoli kasarina sydämen pysähdyxeen. Rooger aateloitiin, vaikkei käynyt loppuun edes teatterikoulua. “But because of the war there were 16 girls in every class to four boys so while I didn’t learn that much about acting, I learned a hell of a lot about sex.”
          ellauri219.html on line 304: “But I’m not putting him down. He was a wonderful actor and we were good friends – although we became better friends when we finished shooting. He really wanted to feel that he was in control, though actually it was me who was his boss." Tony oli Roogeria 2v vanhempi. Rooger eli 5v vanhemmaxi.
          ellauri219.html on line 309: American artist Wallace Berman more than earned his place on the album cover: his pioneering “assemblage art” took a three-dimensional approach to the collage style that Peter Blake excelled in, and is an influence that can be felt on the Sgt. Pepper’s design.
          ellauri219.html on line 314: Like Max Miller (No.37), Tommy Handley was another British wartime comedian. Born in Liverpool, he would have been a local hero for The Beatles, and his BBC radio show, ITMA (“It’s That Man Again”) ran for ten years, from 1939 to 1949, until Handley’s sudden death from a brain hemorrhage.
          ellauri219.html on line 339: Lindner was born in Germany in 1901, but moved to the US in 1941, in order to escape the Nazis. In the 50s he developed a style of painting that drew upon Expressionism and Surrealism, along with the hyper-sexualised lifestyle that he encountered in New York. After appearing on the Sgt. Pepper cover, his abstract style would find echoes in the animated feature film Yellow Submarine.
          ellauri219.html on line 349: A prolific author, philosopher, and economist, Karl Marx is best known for his 1848 pamphlet The Communist Manifesto, which outlined the central tenets of his theories, and single-handedly kick-started a political movement. His work continues to influence modern economic thought.
          ellauri219.html on line 364: One of two wax dummies borrowed from a local hairdresser. This one wears a striped red-and-yellow hat, while its counterpart (No.36) sports a green bonnet.
          ellauri219.html on line 369: A friend of John Lennon’s (No.62) dating back to their time studying at Liverpool College Of Art, Stuart Sutcliffe was The Beatles’ original bassist. While the group were living in Hamburg and playing around the city’s clubs, Sutcliffe met photographer Astrid Kirchherr, who gave The Beatles their distinctive early 60s haircuts. Sutcliffe left the group in order to enroll in the Hamburg College Of Art, but his career was tragically cut short when he died, aged 21, from a brain aneurysm.
          ellauri219.html on line 374: On the opposite side of the gathering to the first wax dummy (No.24), this second dummy takes its place next to Stuart Sutcliffe (No.35)
          ellauri219.html on line 379: Another vaudeville star, British comic Max Miller picked up the nickname “The Cheeky Chappie.” Known for his colorful dress sense and his risqué humor, Miller was the master of the double entendre. He also appeared in a number of films throughout the 30s.
          ellauri219.html on line 384: Designed by George Petty, like the Vargas Girls (No.11), Petty Girls were pin-up paintings that appeared in Esquire, between 1933 and 1956, and also found a home on the front of World War II fighter planes – notably on the B-17 fighter jet nicknamed Memphis Belle.
          ellauri219.html on line 389: In his iconic role of Johnny Strabler in the 1953 movie The Wild One, Marlon Brando captured the growing frustrations of the generation that gave birth rock’n’roll. Hailed as one of the greatest actors of all time, it’s also notable that Brando’s rivals in The Wild One, The Beetles, were almost-namesakes of The Beatles.
          ellauri219.html on line 409: An American artist known for large sculptures that play with light and space, Larry Bell first made his mark with a series of “shadowboxes” constructed in the 60s, and has since gone on to receive acclaim for his wide-ranging work, including the Vapor Drawings of the 80s and a subsequent range of Mirage Drawings.
          ellauri219.html on line 419: An Olympic gold-medallist of the 20s, Johnny Weissmuller first made a name for himself as a swimmer before turning his eye to Hollywood. It was as Tarzan that he made his biggest mark on popular culture, returning to the role in a series of films and devising an iconic yell forever associated with the jungle hero.
          ellauri219.html on line 424: Barely visible tucked in between the head and raised arm of Issy Bonn (No.47), Stephen Crane was a Realist novelist who, though dying aged 28, in 1900, is regarded as one of the most forward-thinking writers of his generation. His work incorporated everyday speech, which gave his characters an added realism, and his novels took an unflinching look at poverty.
          ellauri219.html on line 454: Speaking to the BBC in 1965, John Lennon (No.62) declared his love for Alice In Wonderland and Alice Through The Looking Glass, revealing, “I usually read those two about once a year, because I still like them.” It’s perhaps no surprise, then, that the man who wrote the poem “The Walrus And The Carpenter,” which influenced Lennon’s lyrics for “I Am The Walrus,” is given a prominent display on the Sgt. Pepper’s album cover. P.S. Carroll oli pedofiilien ihan terävintä kärkeä.
          ellauri219.html on line 459: Immortalized in the 1962 film Lawrence Of Arabia, in which he was played by Peter O’Toole, TE Lawrence was a British archaeologist and military officer who became a liaison to the Arab forces during the Arab Revolt of 1916 to 1918. His 1922 book, Seven Pillars Of Wisdom, recounted his experiences during the war and laid the foundations for much of his legend.
          ellauri219.html on line 464: The Beatles were famously photographed with boxing legend Cassius Clay in February 1964, in Miami, Florida. But it’s a wax model of boxer Sonny Liston, the man that Clay defeated later that month in order to become the heavyweight champion, who appears on the Sgt. Pepper cover. Liston had held the heavyweight title for two years, from 1962 to ’64, before losing it to Clay, who subsequently changed his name to Muhammad Ali.
          ellauri219.html on line 469: Like its counterpart (No.38), this Petty Girl was one of a series of paintings by George Petty.
          ellauri219.html on line 498: Famed for his non-violent protests and for leading the movement for Indian independence from British rule, Mahatma Gandhi was ultimately removed from the Sgt. Pepper album cover due to concerns that the use of his image would cause offense to the people of India.
          ellauri219.html on line 503: Founded in London 1822, the Royal Antediluvian Order Of Buffaloes continues its work to this day, with outposts in Northern Ireland, Cyprus, Africa, South Africa, India, the Middle East, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. Its motto is “No man is at all times wise” and the organization continues to look after its own members, dependents of deceased members, and charities.
          ellauri219.html on line 515: Created by Jann Haworth, then-wife of Peter Blake, and co-creator of the Sgt Pepper album cover, this cloth grandmother doll was one of a number of stuffed artworks she made from textiles.
          ellauri219.html on line 581: Two of his brothers died in childhood because they had contracted fatal illnesses from him. In 1928, the seven-year-old Rawls contracted diphtheria. His brother Bobby, younger by 20 months, visited him in his room and was fatally infected. The next winter, Rawls contracted pneumonia. Another younger brother, Tommy, caught the illness from him and died.

          Hahaa, sun vika John! Olet perisyntinen!
          ellauri219.html on line 583: At Princeton, Rawls was influenced by Norman Malcolm, Ludwig Wittgenstein's dumb student. During his last two years at Princeton, he "became deeply concerned with theology and its doctrines." He considered attending a seminary to study for the Episcopal priesthood and wrote an "intensely religious senior thesis (BI)." In his 181-page long thesis titled "Meaning of Sin and Faith," Rawls attacked Pelagianism because it "would render the Cross of Christ to no effect." His argument was partly drawn from Karl Marx's book On the Jewish Question, which criticized the idea that natural inequality in ability could be a just determiner of the distribution of wealth in society. Even after Rawls became an atheist, many of the anti-Pelagian arguments he used were repeated in A Theory of Justice. Pelagianism is a heretical Christian theological position that holds that the original sin did not taint human nature and that humans by divine grace have free will to achieve human perfection. Pelagius (c. 355 – c. 420 AD), an ascetic and philosopher from the British Isles, taught that God could not command believers to do the impossible, and therefore it must be possible to satisfy all divine commandments. He also taught that it was unjust to punish one person for the sins of another; therefore, infants are born blameless. Pelagius accepted no excuse for sinful behavior and taught that all Christians, regardless of their station in life, should live unimpeachable, sinless lives, or else... Se oli tollanen humanisti, mitä Hippo aivan erityisesti inhosi. Vittu eihän sitten mitään kirkkoa ja pappeja edes tarvittaisi. Jeesus jäisi työttömäxi, Jahve eläkkeelle.
          ellauri219.html on line 585: To a large degree, "Pelagianism" was defined by its opponent Augustine, and exact definitions remain elusive. Although Pelagianism had considerable support in the contemporary Christian world, especially among the Roman elite and monks, it was attacked by Augustine and his supporters, who had opposing views on grace, predestination and free will. Augustine proved victorious in the Pelagian controversy; Pelagianism was decisively condemned at the 418 Council of Carthage and is still regarded as heretical by the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church.

          Burn in hell Pelagius, go jump in the fiery lake! Vitun humanisti!
          ellauri219.html on line 588: Rawls enlisted in the U.S. Army in February 1943. During World War II, Rawls served as an infantryman in the Pacific, where he served a tour of duty in New Guinea and was awarded a Bronze Star; and the Philippines, where he endured intensive trench warfare and witnessed traumatizing scenes of violence and bloodshed. It was there that he lost his Christian faith and became an atheist.
          ellauri219.html on line 594: Rawls received his Ph.D. from Princeton in 1950 after completing a doct
          ellauri219.html on line 597: In his autobiographical essay, “On My Religion,” Rawls explains why he abandoned his orthodox Christian beliefs in spite of the deeply religious temperament that informed his life and writings. In particular, he recounts how his personal experiences during the Second World War, and especially his awareness of the Holocaust, led him to question whether prayer was possible. “To interpret history as expressing God’s will, God’s will must accord with the most basic ideas of justice as we know them. For what else can the most basic justice be? Thus, I soon came to reject the idea of the supremacy of the divine will as [like the Holocaust] also hideous and evil.” Furthermore, by studying the history of the Inquisition Rawls came to “think of the denial of religious freedom and liberty of conscience as a very great evil,” such that “it makes the claims of the Popes to infallibility impossible to accept.” Finally, his reading of Jean Bodin’s thoughts about toleration led him to claim that religions should be “each reasonable, and accept the idea of public reason and its idea of the domain of the political.” Against this background, it is no wonder that Rawls considers the very concept of religious truth as authoritarian and intolerant, and the ensuing persecution of dissenters as the curse of Christianity.
          ellauri219.html on line 599: Pope Benedict’s basic answer is that, although modern principles of political freedom, democracy, equality, and reasonable argument are to be affirmed, a free state rests on “pre-political moral foundations,” which serve as normative points of reference for every regime and must be held in common by all religions and secular world-views. This answer reflects the fact that Pope Benedict disagrees with Rawls on at least two fundamental issues, which constitute the core of the debate between them and to which I shall refer regularly in the course of my analysis. In the first place, Pope Benedict does not share Rawls’s trust in fundamental human reasonableness as a guarantee for political fairness. For Rawls, persons are reasonable when they are ready to propose principles and standards as fair terms of cooperation and to abide by them willingly, given the assurance that others will likewise do so. Those norms they view as reasonable for everyone to accept and therefore as justifiable to them; and they are ready to discuss the fair terms that others propose.
          ellauri219.html on line 601: This idea of reasonableness informs the whole project of Rawls’s political liberalism, because “the form and content of this reason … are part of the idea of democracy itself.” In contrast, Pope Benedict, although consistently stressing the importance of reason in all human affairs, is much more pessimistic about Rawls’s claim that human beings, who are always children of their own time and cultural situation, are reasonable enough to provide the general principles or standards that are necessary for specifying fair cooperation.

          Joo olen kyllä Pentin kannalla siinä että nää termiittiapinat on aivan vitun tyhmiä, täysin beyond redemption. Mitä uutta kissimirrit tässä? Ei mitään, samaa paskanjauhantaa.
          ellauri219.html on line 631: What's New Pussycat? is a 1965 screwball comedy film directed by Clive Donner, written by Woody Allen in his first produced screenplay, and starring Allen in his acting debut, along with Peter Sellers, Peter O'Toole, Romy Schneider, Capucine, Paula Prentiss, and Ursula Undress.
          ellauri219.html on line 633: Notorious womanizer Michael James wants to be faithful to his fiancée Carole Werner, but every woman he meets seems to fall in love with him, including neurotic exotic dancer Liz Bien and parachutist Rita, who accidentally lands in his car. His psychoanalyst, Dr. Rainer Fassbinder, cannot help, since he is stalking patient Renée Lefebvre, who in turn longs for Michael. Carole, meanwhile, decides to make Michael jealous by flirting with his nervous wreck of a friend, Victor Shakapopulis. Victor struggles to be romantic but Carole nevertheless feigns interest.
          ellauri219.html on line 635: Fassbinder continues to have group sex with his neurotics and obsessives and cannot understand why everyone falls for Michael. The group sessions get stranger—including an indoor cricket match. Michael dreams that all his sexual conquests simultaneously bombard him for attention, listing where they made love.
          ellauri219.html on line 637: Fassbinder goes to the River Seine and fills a rowing boat with kerosene and wraps himself in the Norwegian flag - preparing to commit suicide in the style of a Viking funeral. Victor appears and sets up a small dining table nearby and asks what he is doing. Distracted, Fassbinder forgets his idea of suicide and starts giving Victor advice. Despite his attempts to womanise, Fassbinder is revealed to be married with three children.
          ellauri219.html on line 639: Meanwhile Carole's plan seems to work and Michael asks to marry her. She agrees and they settle on marrying within the week. She moves in but Michael finds fidelity impossible. When a second "fiancee" arrives, she knows the worst. Simultaneously, a woman parachutes into Michael's open-top sports car and he ends up sleeping with her, also meeting other conquests at the bar. This takes place at a small country hotel, where all parties materialise in the format of a typical French farce. Some are checked in, but most just appear. This includes Carole's parents who wander the corridors, causing Michael to jump from room to room. A rumour has also started locally that an orgy is taking place so side characters such as the petrol station attendant also start to appear. Carole appears and wishes to see Michael's room. As they speak, all the other participants chase each other around in the background. Fassbinder's wife tracks him down.
          ellauri219.html on line 650: historiamme surkeimmista Star Trek -jaksoista. O’Toole
          ellauri219.html on line 716: Kuten tiedetään, meditaatio perinne ei ole päässyt mitenkään leimaa-antavaksi valtavirraksi kirkon historian missään vaiheessa. Ja kuten jo Pilven esipuheestakin selviää, tämä on nimenomaisesti varmistettu sillä että se on alistettu mestari-oppilas laitoksen alaisuuteen, initiaatioinen ja hierarkioineen. Tähän on hyvin ymmärrettävä syy, sillä jokainen meditaatiota todella harrastanut tietää, että se on omiaan terästämään itsenäistä ajattelua juurikin niin, meditaatiossa saavutettava sisäinen tasapiano poistaa tehokkaasti mielestä kaikkea sellaista mikä ei kuulu mielen kolminaisuuteen, vaan on ns. väliintulevaa suggestiota. Meditaation harjoittamisessa tulee selkeästi esille ihmisen pyhä kolminaisuus: keho, mieli ja sielu. Sielu on se tyhjän kondomin näköinen hiippari joka pani neizyt Maarian paxuxi särkemättä immenkalvoa.
          ellauri219.html on line 742: Before the 20th century, history indicates the Indian yoga scene was dominated by other Yoga texts such as the Bhagavad Gita, Yoga Vasistha and Yoga Yajnavalkya.
          ellauri219.html on line 744: The yoga scholar David Gordon White writes that yoga teacher training often includes "mandatory instruction" in the Yoga Sutra. White calls this "curious to say the least", since the text is in his view essentially irrelevant to "yoga as it is taught and practiced today", commenting that the Yoga Sutra is "nearly devoid of discussion of indecent postures, dick stretching, and heavy breathing".
          ellauri219.html on line 746: Patanjali is often stated as having claimed there was a hostility between the orthodox Brahminic (Astika) groups and the heterodox, swAstika groups (Buddhism, Jainism, and atheists), like that between a mongoose and a snake. Nathan McGovern argues Patanjali never used this mongoose-snake analogy. But who IS McGovern? Joku juippi quelconque: Nathan McGovern, Credentials:Associate Professor,
          ellauri219.html on line 756: The theme, if the present interpreter be right, is the great regeneration, the birth of the spiritual from the psychical man: the same theme which Paul so wisely and eloquently set forth in writing to his disciples in Corinth, the theme of all mystics in all lands: oka kyljessä, minnekä se tuikata?
          ellauri219.html on line 758: Some of the schools of India say that the psychic nature is, as it were, a looking-glass, eli narsismihan siinä taas on kyseessä. Eli the purpose of life, taas kerran, is the "the undressing of the immortal man; the birth of the spiritual from the psychical, whereby we enter our divine inheritance and come to inhabit Eternity. This is, indeed, salvation, the purpose of all true religion, in all times."
          ellauri219.html on line 760: Tällästä siitä aina tulee kun tyypin ainut sexikumppani on nyrkkikyllikki. Tyypit ajattelee vain izeään eikä ole ymmärtävinään että ne on vaan itiöemiä jonka tehtävä on kovina mutta pehmeäpäisinä pikku puskutraktoreina työntää eteenpäin izekkäitä geenejä. Huom puhe on vain spiritistimiehistä, minnes sutturat on hukkuneet? Niihinhän se kama kuitenkin on pussiin työnnettävä.
          ellauri219.html on line 771: In the practice of meditation, a beginning may be made by fixing the attention upon some external object, such as a sacred image or picture, or a part of a book of devotion. In the second stage, one passes from the outer object to an inner pondering upon its lessons. The third stage is the inspiration, the heightening of the spiritual will, which results from this pondering. The fourth stage is the realization of one’s spiritual being, as enkindled by this meditation. An interior state of spiritual consciousness is reached, which is called “the cloud of things knowable”. Tietämättömyyden pilvi. (tyhjää) puhekuplassa.
          ellauri219.html on line 773: Those who have died, entered the paradise between births, are in a condition resembling meditation without an external object. But in the fullness of time, the seeds of desire in them will spring up, and they will be born again into this world. Kuin Jörkan pornokirjassa, han hade blivit pigg igen. Vad bra.
          ellauri219.html on line 777: Patanjalin kuuden pointin treeniohjelma: First faith; and then from faith, valour; from valour, right mindfulness; from right mindfulness, a one-pointed aspiration toward the soul; from this, perception; and finally, full vision as the soul.
          ellauri219.html on line 779: The kingdom must be taken by force. Firm willy comes only through effort; effort is inspired by faith. The great secret is this: it is not enough to have intuitions; we must act on them; we must live them. Tarmokas tumputus voi löysänkin onnen voittaa.
          ellauri219.html on line 781: For those of weak willy, there is this counsel: to be faithful in obedience, to give the wife, and thus to strengthen the willy to more perfect obedience. The willy is not ours, but Cod’s, and we come into it only through obedience. As we enter into the spirit of Cod, we are permitted to share the power of Cod. If we obey the Master promptly, loyally, sincerely, we shall enter by degrees into the Master’s wife and share the Master’s powerful willy.
          ellauri219.html on line 798: No it is not because of the clash in values between American individualism and libertarianism, and the rest of the West’s social democracy and collectivism. That’s a contributing factor among those with enough cultural affinity and exposure to get to know how the US ticks, which maybe explains some of the last decade or so, with the Internet. But again, the “Death to Amreeka” crowds, the sneering at the unsophisticated doughboys, the dismissal of American culture—all that predated that deep familiarity by decades. The discovery of the substantive cultural mismatches were again a late addition and confirmation bias. (How I like the scientific sound of it: confirmation bias.)
          ellauri219.html on line 822: Because he knew that this venture was not the Safe for Democracy mission that Wilson had in mind, and that stuck in his craw. It stuck in his craw, because he too wanted to believe that America had been making the world Safe for Democracy. But we loyally sent our troops in anyway, under the banner of the Treaty of Westphalia, not Wilson’s Fourteen Points.
          ellauri219.html on line 828: I think a lot of the bias toward Americans also comes from our historical tendency to inflate the wonders of American life to oversized proportions out of sync with reality. Some of this comes from having been put down so frequently, a class-based psychological issue deep-rooted in American life, probably related to so many of us having come from poor immigrant families. We puff up the wonders of American life to compensate for having come from the bottom rungs of society in other countries. We’re not the only culture that does this.
          ellauri219.html on line 832: And there is something… “gee willywickers” about the way Truth Justice and The American Way have been inflated in American mass culture, quite plausibly rooted in that class insecurity, that makes outside cultural elites (and the people that follow after them) reflexively sneer, once they realise the foundations are rotten. Add to this the ludicrous fact that America has no high culture. These are disappointed suitors: they’re not going to console themselves over the emptiness of Scrooge McDuck by turning to Wilt Whatman. Who was no better off than Scrooge by way of civility.
          ellauri219.html on line 956: Joyce Yeaw will likely never forget the day in April 2010 she tried to return some borrowed cheese to Jordan Peterson’s roommate. Once she arrived, she saw Peterson having sex with his pit bull on his bed. Understandably horrified, Yeaw called the cops, but Peterson convinced the officers that he was “just hugging his dog” and he escaped arrest. Two months later, Yeaw again entered the residence, and saw Peterson having sex with the pit bull a second time—on the living room floor. Yeaw called the cops again, and this time, he was arrested.
          ellauri219.html on line 962: While those who never had sex with animals or done drugs may criticize Kara’s, Jordan's and their dogs' lewd behaviors as if they were evil — and this, perhaps, according to Christian morality as they interpret it — anybody who has actually suffered from lewdness puts this to the lie and knows that such behavior is not a moral issue, but a chemical imbalance. Evidently the words of Jesus to “Judge not lest you be judged,” make little impression on such folk, who pretend to themselves that if their worst, most embarrassing moments were made into headlines in the papers, they would do just fine. Even if they themselves had nothing to be embarrassed about in all their life of adventures and misadventures, they ought to have compassion for those who struggle with greater problems than their own. “Let Judge Hicks who is without sin cast the first stone,” is another saying of Jesus that applies to those who would judge and condemn an easy target.
          ellauri219.html on line 969: Eisensteinillä ei ollut leffaa nimeltä Underworld. There have been debates about Eisenstein's sexuality, with a film covering Eisenstein's homosexuality allegedly running into difficulties in Russia. Eisenstein confessed his asexuality to his close friend Marie Seton: "Those who say that I am homosexual are wrong. I have never noticed and do not notice this. If I was homosexual I would say so, directly. But the whole point is that I have never experienced a homosexual attraction, even towards Grisha, despite the fact I have some bisexual tendency in the intellectual dimension like, for example, Balzac or Zola." Eisenstein joi paljon maitoa. Maito oli silloin pulloissa, muistatko? Hän oli menninkäismäinen miesoletettu.
          ellauri219.html on line 973: The Rockettes were created in 1925, but the first non-white Rockette, a Japanese-born woman named Setsuko Maruhashi, was not hired until 1985. The Rockettes did not allow dark-skinned dancers into the dance line until 1987. The justification for this policy was that such women would supposedly distract from the consistent look of the dance group.The first African American Rockette was Jennifer Jones; selected in 1987, she made her debut in 1988 at the Super Bowl halftime show. The next person with a visible but different disability hired by the Rockettes (Sydney Mesher, missing a left hand) was hired in 2019. The first Rockette with hairy bollocks and a huge boner remains to be hired yet.
          ellauri219.html on line 975: Underworld (also released as Paying the Penalty) is a 1927 American silent crime film directed by Josef von Sternberg and starring Clive Brook, Evelyn Brent and George Bankrupt. The film launched Sternberg's eight-year collaboration with Paramount Pictures, with whom he would produce his seven films with actress Marlene Dietrich. Journalist and screenwriter Ben Hecht won an Academy Award for Best Original Story. Time felt the film was realistic in some parts, but disliked the Hollywood cliché of turning an evil character's heart to gold at the end. Filmmaker and surrealist Luis Buñuel named Underworld as his all time favorite film. Critic Andrew Sarris cautions that Underworld does not qualify as "the first gangster film" as Sternberg "showed little interest in the purely gangsterish aspects of the genre" nor the "mechanics of mob power." Film critic Dave Kehr, on the other hand, writing for the Chicago Reader in 2014, rates Underworld as one of the great gangster films of the silent era. "The film established the fundamental elements of the gangster movie: a hoodlum hero; ominous, night-shrouded city streets; floozies; and a blazing finale in which the cops cut down the protagonist."
          ellauri219.html on line 1014: As a child of the 20th century, I suppose, this book sorta speaks to me. Talk to the hand. It precipitates into meaning historical movies I’ve seen. Don is like Wilt Whatman who addressed, in the poem “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry”, the people of the future. Sublime but ironic.
          ellauri219.html on line 1018: Then there’s Moonman 157 and Klara Sax, a feminist ideal of Land Art. What do they have in common? Smudging useful things with paint. An artistic version of food fight. What do Jayne Mansfield’s breasts remind adolescent Eric of? The bumper bullets on a Cadillac. What does Dumb of Dumb and Dumber take for a cute lady's boobs? A semi trailer's fog lights. Meanwhile, Eric masturbates into a condom that reminds him of a missile (with his tiny wiener all loaded and cocked inside). Dad polishes his Buick, the son his dick. The clammy hand of coincidence.
          ellauri219.html on line 1030: Teilhard served in World War I as a stretcher-bearer. He received several citations for speeding. In 1962, with Pierre safely out of this world, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith condemned several of Teilhard's works based on their alleged ambiguities and doctrinal errors. He was a leading proponent of orthogenesis, the idea that evolution occurs in a directional, goal-driven way. Teilhard made sense of the universe by assuming it had a vitalist evolutionary process. When our talk touched on St. Augustine, he exclaimed violently: 'Don’t mention that unfortunate man; he spoiled everything by introducing the supernatural.'" Teilhard siis oli selvä pelagiolainen humanisti! Teilhard has been criticized as incorporating common notions of Social Darwinism and scientific racism into his work, along with support for eugenics, though he has also been defended for doing so by theologian John Haught.
          ellauri220.html on line 79: This poem was originally called "Sun-Down Poem" (1856), and the present title was given it in 1860. It was substantially revised in 1881. The major image in the poem is the ferry. It symbolizes continual movement, backward and forward, a universal motion in space and time.
          ellauri220.html on line 102: He admits that sometimes, evil thoughts cross his mind. The "old knot of contrariety" the poet has experienced refers to Satan and his evil influence on man, which creates the condition of contraries, of moral evil and good in human life. The poet suffered from these evil influences, as have all men. So, the poet implies, do not feel alone because you have been this way — one must accept both the pure and the impure elements of life. A young man's penis in your arse is just one of those eternal things. They come and go just like the Brooklyn ferry. The reference to fusion ("which fuses me into you now") is the basic ideal the poet sought in the beginning. He reiterates the eternal connection between all human beings. Fuck the rest. We must revel in our man-made surroundings, for our relationship with our environment is the ticket to achieving spirituality and fulfillment. He also uses the theater as a metaphor to represent the difference between public life and private life. He acknowledges that he has a sinful streak - but in society, everyone plays a role. The speaker's tone in the poem is honest but also grateful. By appreciating the small things in his life, he feels like a part of something bigger. Wiltin pikku veitikka oli ehkä ammoin wilttaantunut, mutta sen mustalla ystävällä oli something bigger. Veijarilla oli varsin vaikuttava heijari.
          ellauri220.html on line 104: The major image in the poem is the ferry. It symbolizes continual movement, backward and forward, a universal piston like motion in space and time. The ferry moves on, from a point of land, through water, to another point of land. Land and water thus form part of the symbolistic pattern of the poem. Land symbolizes the physical; water symbolizes the spiritual. The circular flow from the physical to the spiritual connotes the dual nature of the universe. Dualism, in philosophy, means that the world is ultimately composed of, or explicable in terms of, two basic entities, such as mind and matter, yin and yang. From a moral point of view, it means that there are two mutually antagonistic principles in the universe — dick and cunt, good and evil. In Whitman's view, both the mind and the spirit are realities and matter is only a means which enables man to realize this truth. His world is dominated by a sense of good, and evil has a very subservient place in it. Man, in Whitman's world, while overcoming the duality of the universe, desires fusion with the sheboy. In this attempt, man tries to transcend the boundaries of space and time, never letting off that dear piston like movement, in and out, in and out.
          ellauri220.html on line 119: Miehistä 1920-luvun suuria seksisymboleita oli Rudolph Valentino. Näyttelijät Mae West, Jean Harlow ja Norma Shearer olivat 1930-luvun Hollywoodin suurimpia seksisymboleita.
          ellauri220.html on line 189: In 1994, the footage was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, and aesthetically significant".
          ellauri220.html on line 191: Some critics have stated that the violence and shock of this home movie led to a new way of representing violence in 1970s American cinema, both in mainstream films, and particularly in indie and underground horror movies. Brugioni recalled seeing a "white cloud" of brain matter, three or four feet (91 or 122 cm) above Kennedy's head, and said that this "spray" lasted for more than one frame of the film.
          ellauri220.html on line 222: Nick ShayNick Shay is a waste-management worker who spends the novel coming to grips with his troubled past.
          ellauri220.html on line 227: Mario BadalatoMario Badalato is the mobster who assures Nick Shay his father wasn't killed in a hit.
          ellauri220.html on line 228: Big SimsBig Sims is one of Nick Shay's coworkers in the waste-management business. He's African American and often talks about how his experiences differ from Nick's.
          ellauri220.html on line 238: EddieEddie is the friend Bronzini visits to cut his hair.
          ellauri220.html on line 260: LouisLouis is the African American bombardier who flies alongside Charles Wainwright Jr. and receives so much radiation he feels like he can see through his skin.
          ellauri220.html on line 265: Manx MartinManx Martin is Cotter's father, a petty thief who steals his son's stolen baseball and sells it.
          ellauri220.html on line 283: VitoVito is Nick Shay's high school buddy who lends Nick his uncle's license plates for the stolen car.
          ellauri220.html on line 286: Bill WatersonBill Waterson is a white businessman who befriends Cotter Martin at the baseball game and who tries to steal his stolen baseball.
          ellauri220.html on line 308:

          (Canada) used by Italian Canadians for those of Anglo-Saxon or Northwestern European descent. Mangiacake literally translates to 'cake eater', and one suggestion is that this term originated from the perception of Italian immigrants that Canadian or North American white bread is sweet as cake in comparison to the rustic bread eaten by Italians.

          ellauri220.html on line 318:
          (U.S.) a white person (southerner). This word was coined in the 19th century by Southern black people to refer to poor white people.

          ellauri220.html on line 334:
          (US) a black person. Once generally accepted as inoffensive, this word is now considered disrespectful by some. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) continues to use its full name unapologetically. This is not to be confused with the term "person of color" which is the preferred term for collectively referring to all non-white people.

          ellauri220.html on line 421: Ja silti: OLEN VAHVASTI SITÄ MIELTÄ, ETTÄ JÄRJELLÄKIN VENÄJÄÄ VOI YMMÄRTÄÄ, ainakin osaksi – kunhan viitsii ottaa asioista selvää, lukea muutakin infoa ja kirjallisuutta kuin mitä suomalainen VALTAmedia on nykyisin täynnä. Jos ja kun haluamme selvitä ilmastokriisistä ja muista globaaleista ongelmista, meidän on joka tapauksessa tehtävä yhteistyötä Venäjän ja muiden pahismaiden kanssa.
          ellauri220.html on line 441: Walesin prinssin kruunajaisissa sali kuhisi arvovaltaisia vieraita. Varmaan sellaisia hyönteisen tai elefantin näköisiä kuin prinsessa Leian käydessä imperiumin parlamentissa. Joutsenkaulaisia naisia atlassilkkipuvuissaan. Halstonin, Adolfon ja Saint Laurentin naamioita. Erään Yhdysvaltain presidentin äiti ja sisar, toisen tytär. Asemastaan tietoisia eloisia pieniä miehiä. Suihkuseurapiirien edustajia, joilla oli arvonimi, muuan maharadža ja maharani, joku paronitar helmikoristeisessa naamiossa. Kuuluisia ja hillittömiä alkoholistirunoilijoita. Kovia teräviä tyylikkäitä naisia, muotilehtien päätoimittajia ja pukusuunnittelijoita. Kennethin kampauksia- tupeerattuja, kieputettuja, pörrötettyjä ja kiharrettuja. Fixuja ihmisiä. Hammaslääkäreitä, pankinjohtaja. Apinoita joita ympäröi inkakuninkaiden aura, jotka olivat samalla lahjakkaita ja omaperäisiä ja omin avuin menestyneitä ja syntyjään kauniita ja itsekeskeisiä ja kovapintaisia, kaikki huokuivat astraalisäteilyä, ja joukkoon kuuluivat vielä häikäilemättömät ja moukkamaiset. Herttuatar Megania ei ollut kuzuttu. Kuningatarkonsortti Rottweiler allekirjoitti paperin jossa hän vannoo suojella (sic) Skotlannin kirkkoa.
          ellauri220.html on line 447: Adlai is in Hebrew עַדְלָי, meaning "refuge". In 1 Chronicles 27:29, he is the father of Shaphat. He is mentioned only in this verse.
          ellauri220.html on line 451: Kennedy told his adviser Walt Rostow that "Adlai wouldn't be happy as president. He thinks that if you talk long enough you get a soft option and there are very few soft options as president."
          ellauri220.html on line 452: Two major events Adlai Stevenson number 2 dealt with during his time as UN ambassador were the Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba in April 1961 and the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962.
          ellauri220.html on line 461: Tycoon's in-law is a trope often found in situation comedy, it's where the boss (often a somewhat unpleasant one) places a relative or in-law in a position of power. Invariably, the relative will be incompetent or worse. A variation on this trope might be to actually have the relative be the protagonist, and have to earn the respect of his or her subordinates before they can actually accomplish anything meaningful. The trope can also be subverted if the relative is actually competent, in which case the grumbling can quickly subside. It can be averted in cases where nepotism is expected, such as a prince becoming king when his mother dies, in which case most people just accept it as the way things are supposed to go. Take Charles The 3rd recently.
          ellauri220.html on line 463: Of course, there is a "moron" demographic out there, and it has its members, but executives seem to believe that every person who watches TV belongs in it. This may be due to something known as the "80-20" rule in business — in this case, that market research shows that 80% of money spent on television-advertised products comes from the lowest 20% in terms of education and intelligence, so show-content is naturally geared towards them. On top of that, not only are viewers stupid, they are also intolerant of people and things unlike themselves, ignorant, hate change, need to be instantly satisfied, and have the attention span of a goldfish.
          ellauri220.html on line 466: There are four variations of this trope, but half native to the author's ancestry, half foreign ancestry is the most common version. Take Rei Shimura for instance.
          ellauri220.html on line 468: Assuming this character was raised overseas, it's notable the character who is Not Too Foreign will rarely speak another language on-screen even if they are supposed to be fluent.
          ellauri220.html on line 472: Many shows and movies don't bother getting a foreign language right when they portray them. The incidence of this increases along with the obscurity of the language. But first and foremost, if the intended audience won't be able to tell the difference anyway, why bother? A variation on this is that the foreigners speak English, but are identified as foreign by an accent or are parading universally known national images.
          ellauri220.html on line 478: Sometimes, when a language is spoken by a non-native speaker, their speech patterns feature traits that show that the speaker is a foreigner. This may include the use of words from the speaker's native language, or errors in their syntax. See You No Take Candle (and its subtrope Tonto Talk) for cases where foreigners consistently talk with very poor grammar and lack of vocabulary. Supertrope to the more racial Asian Speekee Engrish and Tonto Talk, and like them sometimes Truth in Television, although also like them it can sometimes also be considered offensive or politically incorrect if used poorly. Compare Hulk Speak and Strange-Syntax Speaker. See also Gratuitous Foreign Language and As Long as It Sounds Foreign, wherein nobody's supposed to understand any of the words.
          ellauri220.html on line 502: Sometimes the trope doesn´t take effect until partway into the story. In some cases, the actors will be shown speaking their native language to give the audience a taste of what it sounds like before the perspective changes and the actors will shift to speaking English from there on out. Sometimes this shift is softened by the characters giving an excuse to Switch to English within the in-story dialogue itself and then never switching back. In these cases, the audience can assume that the characters went back to speaking their native language at some point, but we now hear it all as English.
          ellauri220.html on line 504: When the work uses this trope on multiple groups of people speaking different languages, things can get complicated. The work may only translate the language of one group and keep the other group speaking its native language. In these cases, the translated group is always the one the audience is supposed to sympathize with, while the untranslated one is portrayed as more "foreign."
          ellauri220.html on line 513: This trope is used in film and television fiction set in the past (or a fantasy counterpart culture heavily based on the past) where characters speak with British accents, even though the film is not set in Britain and the characters are not British. Sometimes the actors are Fake Brits, and sometimes the cast all have British accents except for the sole American star.
          ellauri220.html on line 515: In any case, using The Queen´s Latin makes a series or film commercially viable in the US. It alleviates the need for subtitles, while maintaining the appearance of historical authenticity. It´s just foreign and exotic enough (many British actors already Play Great Ethnics)
          ellauri220.html on line 519: This refers to casting practice, and in the case of Trope Codifier Peter Stormare it has even achieved the status of Casting Gag. It refers to "international" or "ethnic" - at any rate not American or British - actors who are considered to somehow look or be able to act so vaguely but conspicuously foreign that they can be used for any nationality. (Cliff Curtis is a maori.) It´s As Long as It Sounds Foreign and Gratuitous Foreign Language applied to casting. However, But Not Too Foreign is often in effect because you´ll want someone who speaks good English (even though intentionally accented) and rather panders to viewers´ expectations than give an accurate portrayal of a specific ethnic identity which also means that the character´s background might be very vague as long as it´s foreign.
          ellauri220.html on line 591: Joo Emmanuellehan se pätkä oli, vlta 1974. Sen takeen sillä sai olla niin pienet tisutkin. Ei se mua haittaa, pidän sellaisista. Mutta vittu se vanha äijäpaha sexipeetee oli rasittava. Toinen samanmoinen oli Marlon Brando Viimeisessä tangossa. Rasvaisia puoliveteisiä ukkoja letkut puolitangossa. Lush cinematography, marvellous acting (in particular from Sylvia Kristel) and genuinely erotic scenes tastefully directed… Just Jaeckin! It’s the same badly dubbed, funny-for-about-five-minutes shite it’s always been, with ‘Ooh look! Fanny smoke rings! Chortle!’ tired businessman’s humour very much to the delapidated fore. Best bits of this sorry cash cow – sorry, ‘significant cultural event – were the original UK trailers, as voiced by Katie Boyle.
          ellauri220.html on line 635: Don deLillo syntyi rotan vuonna hiljaiseen sukupolveen. There were precisely 1,063 full moons after his birth to this day. People with Chinese zodiac Rat are instinctive, acute and alert in nature which makes them to be brilliant businessmen. They can always react properly before the worst circumstances take place. Their strengths are adaptable, smart, cautious, acute, alert, positive, flexible, outgoing, and cheerful. But they can also be timid, unstable, stubborn, picky, lack of persistence, and querulous. Sen sisaruxista ei ole tietoa.
          ellauri220.html on line 643: Tizzone. Italian word for black person. Literal meaning is burnt. " So lets get this straight, your'e ditsoon, charcoal briquette. Get the ditsoon mug. ditsoon (rude & offensive) Black-skinned person. Etim. "tizzone" in Italian. Literally meaning "ember". " Yo, you! Yeah you! The ditsoon in the white jacket !"
          ellauri220.html on line 657: Aseet ja jäte, kulleja ja pilluja kaikkialla. Siinähän ne taas ovat: KILL! EAT! ja FUCK! nyt tässä järjestyxessä. Ei kynäilijät pääse mitenkään irti näistä aiheista, ja mixi pääsisivät, nämähän ne ainoastaan kiinnostavat joka ikistä raitaperseistä paviaania. Ja eikös tän kaiken huipennus ole että epämiellyttävä Nick mätkii väpelöä Brian Classicia Kazakhstanissa, joka on bylsinyt Nickin Marian-vaimoa sen selän takana. Juupa juu, EAT! (vaimo on omaisuuttani, pois reviiriltäni), FUCK! (vain minä saan sitä nussia, vaikkei huvittaisikaan) ja KILL! (tästä saat ja tästä! maista nyrkkiäni!) yhtyvät tässä kolmiodraamassa. Kiitos ja näkemiin, nyt on kaikki koossa pienessä narukerässä. de Lillon nimi perässä. Is this cheese?
          ellauri220.html on line 661: Eiku hetkinen, stop press, täältä tulee vielä loppuvizien jälkeen pikku tunnelmapalanen, vähän kuin jenkkijännäreissä loppukättelyiden jälkeen pahis pääsee karkuun häkistä ja sitä pitää vielä kerran vähän nujuuttaa. Ja se vizi koskee sitä Bronxissa kirmaillutta katutyttöä, joka on vihdoin löytynyt jostain ruumiina, ja aiheuttaa nyt katolisille ihmeitä. Lapset rakastavat kun jätekasoista nousee metaanihöyryä kuin karjalauman perseestä, aiheuttaen kasvihuoneilmiötä. Ai mitä ilmiötä? Siitä ei 1997 ollut mitään puhetta.
          ellauri220.html on line 669: Esmeraldan väkisinmakaaja on vaan joku "Ankka", ilman nimeä, joka on jostain vihainen koko naissukukunnalle ja kostaa sille miellyttävimmällä keximällään tavalla, ruiskimalla koko kassillisen 12-vuotiaan tussun perälle, mätkimällä lasta vielä nyrkillä ja flengaamalla sen lopuxi pihalle. Ei mitään henkilökohtaista, sori siitä. Painallus 1. Misogyyni siis painoi nappulaa talossa ilman hissiä. Tästä nyt sitten jotkut kehittävät jotain toivoa. Niinpä tietysti, eihän muuten oltaisikaan jenkeissä. Köyhät tarvizevat unelmia, eikö niin? No ei, tää onkin sisar Edgarin 8 sekuntia valokeilassa, nuoret ihmiset tinttijulisteineen syleilevät sitä. Laminoituja Esmeraldan kuvia myydään painettuina rukouskortteihin. Ihme on palaamassa kulutusyhteiskunnan normikäytäntöön. Mainostilaa vuokrataan. Neuvostoliiton paras puoli oli ettei mainostilaa vuokrattu. Alma Edgar vetää henxelit. Painallus 2. Kuollut kassi-Alma seikkailee bittiavaruudessa.
          ellauri220.html on line 671: The Tsar Bomba, or RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, is the largest nuclear bomb in the world today. This astounding thermonuclear bomb was created by the USSR with the goal of creating the largest nuclear weapon in the world, and it still holds the record for the most powerful explosive ever detonated.
          ellauri221.html on line 73: The club’s name derives from its head waiter, Edward Poodle. Poodles quickly built up a prestigious reputation among London’s powerful and wealthy classes, and its membership reflected this, numbering numerous politicians and members of the British aristocracy. Members have included former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, John Perfumo (a politician who resigned after the notorious Perfumo affair scandal, whereby he was revealed as having an affair with 19-year-old model Helen Keller), philosopher David Hume, economist and philosopher Adam Smith, and author Ian Fleming, creator of the world’s most famous fictional spy, James Bond.
          ellauri221.html on line 75: Fleming used to visit the club for lunch, though it’s not known whether he enjoyed the club’s famous Agent Orange Fool, an indulgent traditional British dessert made with fruit and cream that became synonymous with Poodles. It’s said that Fleming based Blades, a fictional private members’ club in the James Bond series (mentioned in two Bond novels, 1955’s Moonraker and You Only Live Twice in 1964) largely on Poodles. Certainly, the architectural features and opulent décor of Blades described by Fleming in his novels both bear similarities to Poodles.
          ellauri221.html on line 103: his cruel and inhumane law. He switched immediately to drinking only Tittinger.
          ellauri221.html on line 155: Cox's Brownies were little men who had mischievous adventures together. Each Brownie had a distinctive physical appearance: Cholly Boutonnière wore a top hat and monocle, while others wore traditional Turkish, Irish, German, Swedish, Russian, and Chinese garb. There was an Eskimo, an American Indian, even an Uncle Sam. "Much of the success of his books can be attributed to his treatment of the characters, who portray human nature with its goodness and strength and also its follies, but never its baseness.".
          ellauri221.html on line 157: An important characteristic of the Dunno trilogy is its heavily didactic nature. Nosov describes this as an effort to teach "honesty, bravery, camaraderie, willpower, and persistence" and discourage "jealousy, cowardice, mendacity, arrogance, and effrontery." Strong political undertones are also present. In addition to general egalitarianism and feminism, communist tendencies dominate the works. The first book takes the reader into a typical Soviet-like town, the second into a communist utopia, and the third into a capitalistic satire. Nosov's captivating and humorous literary style has made his ideologies accessible to children and adults alike.
          ellauri221.html on line 267: The Adventures of Dunno in Flower Town presents a socialist anarchist utopia of Flower town. This society is self sufficient and enjoys a variety of personalities. It raises questions of the role of science and medicine, travel and knowledge, self-subsistence and hierarchy in a simple, humorous and concomitantly lovely style. Margaret Wetlin, an American who had immigrated to Russia during Stalinism, made an excellent translation of this book into English.
          ellauri221.html on line 269: In an update of a study on empathy originally conducted in 1979, Sara Konrath, a researcher at the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research, Ed O’Brien and Courtney Hsing have presented “Changes in Dispositional Empathy in American College Students Over Time: A Meta-Analysis” at the annual convention of Psychological Sciences in Boston (May 28th 2010). In this study they find a drastic difference in today’s student body on campuses from college students of the late 1970s. Today’s students disagree more frequently with such statements as: “I sometimes try to understand my friends better by imagining how things look from their perspective”, or, “I often have tender, concerned feelings for people less fortunate than me.”
          ellauri221.html on line 271: Surrounded by anthropogenic ecological disasters, brutal wars, and the threat of destruction looming over the future of the planet itself due to our actions, constructed knowledge, and structured ignorance, it becomes urgent to examine the underlying ontological concepts and the reality from which our children are incarcerated in schools. This research is an attempt to look at what is the knowledge that children get exposed to and my main question is whether identity and civilisation are not the underlying culprits in our alienation from the world. As Tove Jansson shows in her moominbooks, perhaps it is necessary to empathise even with the one who dislikes us and not limit ourselves to people only, but see if “I can often have tender, concerned feelings for anyone (animals and people included) as fortunate or less fortunate than me”.
          ellauri221.html on line 277: Onko täällä lähistöllä pikku ruistyttöjä?

          ellauri221.html on line 294: Doctor Jolly Goodhead is a fictional character from the James Bond franchise, portrayed by Lois Chiles. She does not appear in any of the Ian Fleming novels, only in the film version of Moonraker (1979), but her character is similar to that of Gala Brand, the female lead in the original novel Moonraker (1955), by way of being James´s major lay this time round. In 25 years, James has graduated from screwing a secretary to schtupping a doctor of science. Way to go, Bond girls! Right on!
          ellauri221.html on line 302: Bond meets Goodhead again once Drax puts them under ´Moonraker 5´ to be incinerated by the lift-off. They escape and are able to pilot ´Moonraker 6´. After following Drax to his space station, Goodhead and Bond listen to Drax´s speech and leave. Jaws later captures them after the first globe is launched. Drax tells Bond about his plan about having perfect human beings on his earth, with no physical peculiarity or ugliness, but this is overheard by Jaws. He sees that because of his ugly steel teeth, he will be destroyed alongside his ugly girlfriend, Dolly, so turns on Drax and helps Bond and Goodhead to fight Drax´s men. After Bond goes to defeat Drax, Goodhead helps him, and Dolly and Jaws get off on the self-destructing space station, escaping on a pod of their own into Earth´s atmosphere. Bond and Goodhead go after the globe, nearly destroying its inhabitants, but not quite. Bugger it.
          ellauri221.html on line 304: The film ends with the representatives of the US and Britain tuning in to see Holly Goodhead and Bond making love. The previous Bond film, The Spy Who Loved Me, ends in the same way, and Anya Amasova (way more beautiful than Lois) was shocked by this candaulism, but Goodhead is too "happy" to care. She is American after all. Last Words: Oh James, rake me around the moon one more time.
          ellauri221.html on line 307: James Bond is back for another mission and this time, he is blasting off into space. A spaceship travelling through space is mysteriously hijacked and Bond must work quickly to find out who was behind it all. He starts with the rockets creators, Drax Industries and the man behind the organization, Hugo Drax. On his journey he ends up meeting Dr. Holly Goodhead and encounters the metal-toothed Jaws once again.
          ellauri221.html on line 309: A space shuttle called the Moonraker, built by Drax Industries, is on its way to the U.K. when it is hijacked in mid-air and the crew of the 747 carrying it is killed. Bond immediately is called into action, and starts the investigation with Hugo Drax. While at the Drax laboratories, Bond meets the brilliant and stunning Dr. Holly Goodhead, a N.A.S.A. astronaut and C.I.A. Agent who is investigating Drax for the U.S. Government. One of Drax´s thugs, the sinister Chan, attempts to kill 007 at the lab, but when that fails, he follows Bond to Venice and tries again there. Bond and Goodhead follow Drax´s trail to Brazil, where they once again run into the seven-foot Goliath Jaws, a towering giant with metal teeth. Escaping from him, they discover the existence of a huge space station undetected by U.S. or Soviet radar, and a horrible plot by Drax to employ nerve gas in a genocidal project. James and Holly must quickly find a way to stop Hugo Drax before his horrific plans can be put into effect.
          ellauri221.html on line 310: A space shuttle is stolen enroute to London and M sends James Bond out to apologize to the shuttle creator, billionaire Hugo Drax. While visiting Drax´s estate, several attempts are made on Bond´s life, making Drax the number one suspect. Bond also meets Dr. Holly Goodhead, a N.A.S.A. scientist, who is also a C.I.A. Agent investigating Drax. Their investigations lead Bond to discover a plot to murder the world´s population so that Drax can repopulate the planet in his image. The chase takes Bond all over the world, California, Brazil, the Amazon James, and, finally, to Drax´s huge space-city over the Earth. Drax, meanwhile, has hired a old friend of Bond to take care of any problems, the steel-toothed killer Jaws.
          ellauri221.html on line 351: Bond ja Galatea ottavat lasilliset Haigin whiskyä. Se on vahvaa ainetta! Kuin dynamiittia! Kunnon Sir Hu... Hugo-peikko! Herää pahvi! Aamu on kaunis, tarkoitan iltapäivä. Fiuu, ei kuiskaustakaan. Jumalan tähden! Mitä nyt? Kazokaa! Valtava räjähdys. Sienimäinen pilvi nousee ilmaan. Onnexi se ei osunut Lontooseen vaan jonnekin Hollannin suunnalle. Hollannista on huonoja uutisia. Kilometrikaupalla patoja rikki. Mutta eihän se ole meidän päänsärkymme. Eiköhän EU ja Putin usko nyt että UK on kova tekijä, jenkkien avulla tai lähestulkoon ilman kloorikanoja.
          ellauri221.html on line 372: This is birth control to Major Plum
          ellauri221.html on line 377: This is Major Plum to birth control
          ellauri222.html on line 39: ...a man who was a towering intellectual (but short), a charismatic personality (but nasty) and Nobel Prize winner (anti communist) who searched in his writing for an answer (haha what did he find? EFK?) to the spiritual wilderness at the core of the human experience – but also (and above all) a petty man replete with human faults. Tää on tietysti Sale, jonka rusikointi jatkuu tässä Salen dickensiläistä pikareskiromaania lukiessa. Tämä albumi on jatkoa albumille 52, jossa Salea on jo alustavasti rökitetty.
          ellauri222.html on line 41: Kuopiolainen taloyhtiö antoi 70-vuotiaalle rikosrekisterittömälle naiselle varoituxen kun sen alaikäinen lapsenlapsi oli puristanut finnin hississä ja pyyhkinyt sen peiliin. 2sta varoituxesta saa yhtiö ottaa huoneiston hallintaansa. Finnijäljen pyyhki taloyhtiön hallituxen jäsen peilistä wiledaliinalla. Syyllinen käytiin kazomassa valvontakameran filmistä. Varmaan nainen ja sen lapsenlapsi olivat väärää heimoa. Eivät olleet kasvantavääriä pohjoissavolaisia, joilla huumori on syntyperäistä.
          ellauri222.html on line 68: In Leader's Bellow biography Vol 2, “Love and Strife,” the novel “Herzog” is published on the very first page and reaches No. 1 on the best-seller list, supplanting John le Carré’s ‘The Spy Who Came In From the Cold.’ Never again would Bellow, about to turn 50 years old, lack for wealth, power, awards or flunkies to stand by him, ready to take his coat and do his bidding. The temptation for someone in his position was to become an insufferable, spoiled monster. And Bellow quickly gave in to temptation.
          ellauri222.html on line 70: Bellow’s bad temper in the late ’60s was by no means directed exclusively at would-be biographers, radical students and aggrieved wives. Bellow had so many targets to attack, whether insulting them face to face or in blistering letters or put-downs circulated through intermediaries. One of his favorite one-liners ran: “Let’s you and him fight.” The most salient recipients of Bellow’s bad temper in this biography were his three sons, each from a different mother — the oldest 21 when this volume starts, the youngest just 1 year old and about to be abandoned after yet another divorce.
          ellauri222.html on line 72: The celebrated writer kept romances alive in different cities, two or three at any given time — with students and faculty divorcées at the University of Chicago, assistants at The New Yorker, even his housecleaner. A dreary train of affairs.
          ellauri222.html on line 74: Bellow didn’t just model some main characters on famous friends, but all characters were taken from life. He was in many ways a very thoughtful and kind person, but I think his need to be the top dog, the best, was very deep.
          ellauri222.html on line 76: The irony in Bellow’s soul was that he craved love and experience, and learned to view people coldly and clinically. The writer Amos Oz recalled most vividly from his friendship with Bellow an exchange that they shared privately about death. “I said I was hoping to die in my sleep, but Saul responded by saying that, on the contrary, he would like to die wide awake and fully conscious, because his death is such a crucial experience he wouldn’t want to miss it.”
          ellauri222.html on line 78: As previous biographers have discovered, it’s difficult to write an endearing biography of Bellow. “Was I a man or was I a jerk?” Bellow inquired on his deathbed. The answer should be obvious.
          ellauri222.html on line 98: Saul Bellow is the only American Jewish author to have won the Nobel Prize in Literature, and has also won three Pulitzer Prizes. In his new book, Greg Bellow, who holds a Ph.D. from the California Institute of Social Work and was a practicing psychotherapist for many years, divides his father’s life into “Young Saul” and “Old Saul.” He describes Young Saul as a sociable and funny man, full of questions. During the 1930s and ’40s, Saul was a Marxist and a “genuine believer” in radical philosophy. He believed that World War II was a war between communism and capitalism, and he was convinced that “come the Revolution there will be a flowering of society,” according to Greg’s book.
          ellauri222.html on line 100: As it turned out, “Young Saul” was wrong about World War II. As Greg put it to the audience at Temple Emanuel, “He blew it.” Moreover, speaking of the post-war “Old Saul,” Greg said his father “turned from a man of questions to a man of answers.” As he began to recognize the social evils that surrounded him in the post-war world, he felt that “mankind cannot govern itself any better than Hitler or Stalin” and grew ever more critical and pessimistic.
          ellauri222.html on line 102: “He became irascible and angry, anti-black and anti-women’s lib,” Greg Bellow told the audience.

          Saul Bellow’s attitude towards Judaism was changed completely by the Six Day War in June 1967. It transformed him from a socialist to a conservative. He had a need to get involved and, much to the surprise of his family, he left for Israel to cover the war as a correspondent for Newsday. “I had to go,” Saul explained at the time.
          ellauri222.html on line 104: Greg said he is convinced that it was “seeing war at close-up that made [Saul] change his mind and awakened him to his Judaism.”
          ellauri222.html on line 108: Arthur Sammler, the protagonist of the novel, is a Holocaust survivor living in New York in the ’60s. He is an intellectual who has maintained many of his Central European attitudes about culture. While he marvels at Neil Armstrong landing on the moon and other evidence of progress and prosperity, Sammler is at the same time appalled by the excesses and degradations of city life. By the end of the novel he has learned to bridge the gap between himself and those around him, and has come to accept that a “good life” is one in which a person does that which is “required of him.”
          ellauri222.html on line 110: Asked whether they believe there is a possibility that our world might once experience the kind of upheaval it did during World War II and the Holocaust, much as the world of Mr. Sammle r collapsed in Saul Bellow’s novel, both Wolpe and Greg Bellow told JNS.org that Mr. Sammler’s Planet is recommended reading not just for Jews, but for everyone. They strongly believe that the history and lessons of the Holocaust must continue to be taught, with Rabbi Wolpe saying "Gaza shows the ease with which a civilization, such as Israel, can slip into barbarism.”

          Wolpe wondered how many young people today even know Saul Bellow or read his work, but mused how wonderful it would be if more children of famous authors wrote about their parents, as Greg Bellow has.
          ellauri222.html on line 112: Greg, asked to speculate on how his father might view today’s social values as compared to those of the ’60s, which Sammler criticized so strongly, told JNS.org that Saul Bellow probably would not have changed his opinion since “ours is a society with shallow moral values.”

          “We’re not done with genocide on the basis of race and ethnicity, and we live at a time when death can come out of the sky at any moment,” Greg said. "We fear nothing except that the sky might crash on us one day."
          ellauri222.html on line 117: “I am an American, Chicago born” begins the famous first sentence of “The Adventures of Augie March.” The author of that sentence was actually an illegal immigrant, Canada born, and the words were written in Paris. Bellow’s father, Abraham Belo, was born in a shtetl inside the Pale of Settlement. He began his career in St. Petersburg as a produce broker, specializing in Egyptian onions and Spanish fruit. The family seems to have been quite well off. Abraham had used a forged document to work in St. Petersburg, and, when this was discovered, he was arrested and convicted. He may have gone to prison. But he managed to escape and, in 1913, to get his family to Canada.
          ellauri222.html on line 119: They settled in Lachine, outside Montreal, where Abraham tried farming, and where, in 1915, Saul was born. When the farm failed, the family moved into the city and Abraham took up bootlegging, a venture that ended even more disastrously. In 1924, he moved again, to Chicago, and engaged some bootlegging associates to smuggle his wife and children across the border to join him.
          ellauri222.html on line 121: Abraham spent the rest of his life in Chicago, and he ended up running a retail coal business. But he never really learned English—Yiddish was the language at home—and he never became a citizen. He had no passport and no driver’s license (which didn’t prevent him from driving). Saul did not become an American citizen until 1943.
          ellauri222.html on line 123: But Chicago was a city of immigrants. It also had a large Jewish population—by 1931, according to Leader, nearly three hundred thousand in a city of 3.3 million. All the Bellow children assimilated happily and all became well off. Saul is often associated with the University of Chicago, where he taught for many years as a member of the legendary Committee on Social Thought. He was a student there, but for less than two years. He had to withdraw for financial reasons (a truck driver was killed in an accident at his father’s coal yard and the insurance had lapsed), and he transferred to Northwestern, from which he graduated in 1937.
          ellauri222.html on line 125: In his Op-Ed about the Zulu Tolstoy, Bellow made much of his academic training in anthropology. After leaving Northwestern, he did become a graduate student in anthropology at the University of Wisconsin. But he completed just one course before dropping out and returning to Chicago, where he married a woman, Anita Goshkin, who was studying for a master’s degree in social work, and began his career as a fiction writer and itinerant college teacher. His first job was at Pestalozzi-Froebel Teachers College, on South Michigan Avenue, in downtown Chicago.
          ellauri222.html on line 131: “In college I behaved as though my career was to be a writer, and that guided me,” Bellow later said. There was also the fact that his principal interest was literature, and, until after the war, Jews were rarely hired by English departments. “You weren’t born to it” is the way the chairman of the department at Northwestern clarified the matter when Bellow inquired about graduate school. Leader thinks that this encounter “produced a lifelong antipathy, mild but real, to English departments.” It’s true that there was antipathy. But Bellow would have been interested in a university career only as a means to support his writing. Fiction was his calling. “He was focused, he was dedicated to becoming what he was, from the beginning,” David Peltz, Bellow’s oldest friend, told Leader. “I mean, he never veered.”
          ellauri222.html on line 133: Bellow published his first short story in 1941. It came out in Partisan Review—marking the start of a relationship that was key to establishing Bellow’s reputation as the intellectuals’ chosen novelist. Bellow visited New York frequently, and lived there at various points, but he was never comfortable in the city. “I congratulated myself with being able to deal with New York,” he told Philip Roth near the end of his life, “but I never won any of my struggles there, and I never responded with full human warmth to anything that happened there.”
          ellauri222.html on line 135: Still, in New York and at Princeton, where he spent a year teaching creative writing, Bellow made friends with many of the critics who dominated literary life in the nineteen-fifties. They found him bright, congenial, and sufficiently bookish, and especially admired what they took to be his poise and real-world savvy. Irving Howe thought Bellow “very strong-willed and shrewd in the arts of self-conservation.” “Even his egocentricity added to his charms,” said William Phillips, the co-editor, with Philip Rahv, of Partisan Review. “Stunning—the ultimate beautiful young Jewish intellectual incarnate,” Alfred Kazin’s wife, Ann Birstein, remembered. Bellow maintained the allure by cultivating just the right amount of aloofness. “I was the cat who walked by himself,” as he put it.
          ellauri222.html on line 137: In the culture of little magazines, friendship is the last thing to prevent one writer from reviewing the work of another. As a novelist happy to have well-disposed reviewers, Bellow had an obvious stake in these friendships. But the friends had a stake in Bellow, too. As Mark Greif points out in his important new study of mid-century intellectual life, “The Age of the Crisis of Man,” Bellow came on the scene at a time when many people imagined the fate of modern man to be somehow tied to the fate of the novel. Was the novel dead or was it not? Much was thought to depend on the answer. And for people who worried about this Bellow was the great hope. Atlas quotes Norman Podhoretz: “There was a sense in which the validity of a whole phase of American experience was felt to hang on the question of whether or not he would turn out to be a great novelist.”
          ellauri222.html on line 139: So even “Dangling Man,” an awkwardly written book about which Bellow later said, “I can’t read a page of it without feeling embarrassed,” was received as a sign that the novel might after all be up to its historic task. “Here, for the first time I think, the experience of a new generation has been seized,” Delmore Schwartz wrote, in Partisan Review. In The New Yorker, Edmund Wilson called “Dangling Man” a “testimony on the psychology of a whole generation.” When Bellow’s second novel, “The Victim,” came out, in 1947, Martin Greenberg, in Commentary, explained that Bellow had succeeded in making Jewishness “a quality that informs all of modern life . . . the quality of modernity itself.” In Partisan Review, Elizabeth Hardwick suggested that Bellow might become “the redeeming novelist of the period.”
          ellauri222.html on line 141: This notion that Bellow’s achievement as a novelist was redemptive of the form was a consistent theme in the reviews up through “Herzog.” So was the notion that his protagonists were representatives of the modern condition. After “Herzog,” those reactions largely disappeared. People stopped fretting about the death of the novel, and Bellow’s protagonists started being treated as what they always were, oddballs and cranks. But the critical reception of Bellow’s books in the first half of his career funded his reputation. It cashed out, ultimately, in the Nobel Prize. Nobels are awarded to writers who are judged to have universalized the marginal.
          ellauri222.html on line 143: As everyone has said, Bellow not least, “Augie March” was the breakthrough book. Bellow ascribed its origin to a visionary moment. In 1948, he had gone with Anita to Paris for two years, supported by a Guggenheim fellowship. (Bellow hated Paris.) He was at work on a novel called “The Crab and the Butterfly,” which apparently concerned two men arguing in a hospital room. In the version of the epiphany he told to Roth, he was walking to his writing studio one morning when he was distracted by the routine Parisian sight of the street gutters being flushed:
          ellauri222.html on line 145: I remember saying to myself, “Well, why not take a short break and have at least as much freedom of movement as this running water.” My first thought was that I must get rid of the hospital novel—it was poisoning my life. And next I recognized that this was not what being a novelist was supposed to have meant. . . . I felt just now that I had allowed myself to be dominated by the atmosphere of misery or surliness, that I had agreed somehow to be shut in or bottled up.
          ellauri222.html on line 147: Into his head popped the memory of a friend from childhood, a boy named Charlie August—and Augie March was born. The novel poured out of him. “All I had to do was to be there with buckets to catch it,” he said. Being abroad, he thought, encouraged the sense of compositional freedom. He wrote much of the novel in Europe—in Paris, Salzburg, and Rome. He later boasted that not a single word of it was written in Chicago.
          ellauri222.html on line 149: The subject of “Augie March” is the same as the subject of “Dangling Man” and “The Victim”: the danger of becoming trapped in other people’s definition of you. In the case of “Augie March,” the person in danger of being trapped was Saul Bellow. “This was not what being a novelist was supposed to have meant”: he is referring to the expectations of his intellectual backers. He realized that he didn’t want to be the great hope of the novel or to give voice to a generation’s angst. He wanted to write up the life he knew in the way James Joyce had written up the life he knew, and to transform it into a fantastic verbal artifact, a book that broke all the rules.
          ellauri222.html on line 153: Augie is a street-urchin autodidact. Never taught how to write a proper sentence, he invents a style of his own. He is an epigrammist and a raconteur, La Rochefoucauld in the body of a precocious twelve-year-old, a Huck Finn who has taken too many Great Books courses. With this strange mélange of ornate locutions, Chicago patois, Joycean portmanteaus, and Yiddish cadences, Bellow found himself able to produce page after page of acrobatic verbal stunts:
          ellauri222.html on line 155: One day’s ordinary falsehood if you could convert it into silt would choke the Amazon back a hundred miles over the banks. However, it never appears in this form but is distributed all over like the nitrogen in potatoes.
          ellauri222.html on line 163: Bellow must have guessed that “Augie March” would distress some of his admirers. It did. He showed a hundred pages of the manuscript to Lionel Trilling. “It’s very curious, it’s very interesting,” Trilling told him, “but somehow it’s wrong.” When the book came out, Trilling wrote a positive notice in the newsletter of the book club he directed but registered concern about a dangerous notion he detected in the novel, the notion that one could have a meaningful life independent of one’s social function. Bellow wrote to Trilling to say (disingenuously) that he had written the novel without much of a moral purpose in mind. Trilling wrote back. “You mustn’t ignore the doctrinal intention of your book,” he said.
          ellauri222.html on line 169: At Bard, Bellow became close friends with a literature professor named Jack Ludwig. As Leader describes him, Ludwig was an oversized personality, a big man, extravagant, a shameless purveyor of bad Yiddish, and an operator. Ludwig idolized Bellow; people who knew them said that Ludwig wanted to be Bellow. He flattered Bellow, went for long walks with him, started up a literary journal with him, and generally insinuated himself into Bellow’s life. Bellow accepted the proffer of adulatory attentiveness. The couples (Ludwig was married) socialized together. This was the period when Bellow wrote “Seize the Day,” which Partisan Review published in a single issue, in 1956, after The New Yorker turned it down, and “Henderson the Rain King,” published in 1959, a novel whose hero was based on a neighbor of the Bellows in upstate New York.
          ellauri222.html on line 175: Devastated, Bellow went to Europe on a cultural-diplomacy junket for the State Department. While abroad, he engaged assiduously in what Leader calls “womanizing.” He returned to Bard, in the summer of 1960, and took up with a visiting French professor named Rosette Lamont. The divorce from Sasha went through in June. For a while, Bellow and Sasha had the same lawyer, who was pleased to be representing both parties in the hottest divorce in town, but eventually Bellow was persuaded to retain his own attorney.
          ellauri222.html on line 177: In November, Bellow learned from a possibly overly conscientious babysitter that Sasha and Ludwig were sleeping together. It turned out that the affair had been going on for two and a half years, since the summer of 1958. And although Ludwig was still married, it continued. Adam was living with Sasha while it was going on. Given Bellow’s vulnerabilities, the double betrayal was his worst nightmare come to life. According to Atlas, he talked about getting a gun.
          ellauri222.html on line 179: I have just given you the back story and the dramatis personae of “Herzog.” “Herzog” is a novel about a forty-seven-year-old man having a nervous breakdown after learning that his much younger wife, who has left him abruptly, had been cheating on him with his closest friend. The man seeks succor in the arms of a loving, patient, and understanding woman. There is at least one respect in which the novel is not based on real life: Bellow didn’t have a nervous breakdown. He wrote “Herzog” instead.
          ellauri222.html on line 181: He also got married again, in 1961, to Susan Glassman, another celebrated beauty, this time eighteen years younger. (Glassman was a former girlfriend of Philip Roth, who said that the transfer of affections “turned out to be the best thing that ever happened to me and the worst thing that ever happened to Saul.” The marriage lasted five years; she was still taking Bellow to court in 1981.)
          ellauri222.html on line 183: “Herzog” is a revenge novel. The ex-wife, Madeleine, is a stone-cold man-killer. Her lover, Valentine Gersbach, is described as a “loud, flamboyant, ass-clutching brute.” Ludwig had a Ph.D. and a damaged foot; Bellow makes Gersbach a radio announcer with a wooden leg. The Herzog character is passive, loving, an innocent soul who cannot make sense of a world in which people like his estranged wife and her lover can exist. He is an ex-university professor, the author of a distinguished tome called “Romanticism and Christianity.” The Rosette Lamont character, called Ramona, is a sexpot with a heart of gold; she specializes in intimate candlelight dinners and lacy lingerie. She is a professor of love, not French.
          ellauri222.html on line 187: Howe wrote that “Herzog” was a novel “driven by an idea”—the idea that modern man can overcome alienation and despair. Howe could see the appeal of this idea, but he was worried that it might not have been “worked out with sufficient care.” The reviewer in the Times Book Review thought that the novel offered “a credo for the times.” “The age is full of fearful abysses,” the reviewer explained. “If people are to go ahead, they must move into and through these abysses,” and so on.
          ellauri222.html on line 189: Bellow must have been tickled to death. The inventive feature of “Herzog” is a series of letters that the protagonist, in his misery, composes not only to Madeleine and Gersbach but to famous people (like President Eisenhower) and philosophers (like Heidegger and Nietzsche). These long letters, unfinished and unmailed, are sendups of an intellectual’s effort to understand human behavior by means of the conceptual apparatus of Mortimer Adler’s Great Books. Herzog is a comic figure, a holy fool, a schlimazel with a Ph.D. The whole point of his story is that when you are completely screwed the best you can hope for is a little sex and sympathy. The Western canon isn’t going to be much help.
          ellauri222.html on line 191: The determination to consider the novel strictly as fiction extended even to its characters. Rosette Lamont reviewed the novel. She, too, treated the book as pure make-believe. She breezed right by the Ramona character (“Her religion is sex, a welcome relief from Madeleine’s phony conversion . . . but Herzog is too divided in his mind, too busy with resentment to free himself from a heavy conscience. Besides he is suspicious of pleasure, having learned Julien Sorel’s lesson,” and so on). She concluded with the thought that at the end of the novel Herzog enters into “a theandric relationship with the world around him.”
          ellauri222.html on line 193: And it got even better. Jack Ludwig reviewed the novel. He informed readers of Holiday that “the book is a major breakthrough.” By no means should it be read as autobiography—“as if an artist with Bellow’s enormous gifts were simply playing at second-guessing reality, settling scores.” No, in this book, Ludwig wrote, “Bellow is after something greater.” The greater something turns out to be “man’s contradiction, his absurdity, his alienation,” and so on. It was pretty chutzpadik, as even Bellow had to admit. But by then he was laughing all the way to the bank.
          ellauri222.html on line 195: You can see the biographical problem. From the beginning, Bellow drew on people he knew, including his wives and girlfriends and the members of his own family, for his characters. In “Augie March,” almost every character—and there are dozens—was directly based on some real-life counterpart. Most of “Herzog” is a roman à clef. Leader therefore decided to treat the novels as authoritative sources of information about the people in Bellow’s life. When Leader tells us about Jack Ludwig and Sondra Tschacbasov, he quotes the descriptions of Gersbach and Madeleine in “Herzog.” In the case of the many relatives with counterparts in “Augie March,” this can get confusing. You’re not always sure whether you’re reading about a person or a fictional version of that person.
          ellauri222.html on line 197: One reason for reading biographies of writers like Bellow, who draw from people in their own lives, is to learn what those people were really like, or at least what they were like to someone who is not Bellow. You often can’t do that with Leader’s biography. Leader also wants to assess Bellow’s accomplishment as a novelist. He has to keep three balls in the air at once: the biographical story, an interpretation of the fiction as autobiography, and a consideration of the fiction as fiction. That’s why his book is so long.
          ellauri222.html on line 199: Structure was always Bellow’s weak point. One of his first editors at Partisan Review, Dwight Macdonald, worried about what he called a “centerless facility.” Podhoretz was not wrong about the problem of shapelessness in “Augie March.” The novel’s antic style is like a mechanical bull. For a few hundred pages, Bellow is having the time of his life, letting his invention take him where it will. By the end, he is just hanging on, waiting for the music to stop. It takes the story five hundred and thirty-six pages to get there.
          ellauri222.html on line 201: Leader thinks that Bellow plunged into his books and wrote on sheer enthusiasm, then surfaced after a hundred pages or so and wondered how to get back to shore. There is very little moral logic to his stories. Things just happen. (A major exception is “Seize the Day,” which is formally perfectly realized. But that book is a novella, a day in the life. It doesn’t require a plot.)
          ellauri222.html on line 203: “Herzog,” too, sags in the middle, a long episode in which Herzog reconnects with Ramona. But Bellow came up with a brilliant solution for the second half. Waiting in a courthouse to see his lawyer, Herzog sits in on a trial. A woman and her boyfriend are being tried for murdering her small child, whom they have tortured and beaten to death. The woman is mentally unfit; Herzog hears evidence that she has been diagnosed with a lesion on her brain. (A diabolical touch: Sasha had been diagnosed with a brain lesion.)
          ellauri222.html on line 205: Horrified that Madeleine and Gersbach might be abusing his child (in the novel, a girl), Herzog rushes off to his deceased father’s house, finds a gun his father owned, and goes to Madeleine’s. It is evening. He creeps into the yard and watches Madeleine and Gersbach through the window, loaded pistol in hand. What he sees is an ordinary domestic scene. Gersbach is giving the little girl a bath. Herzog creeps away.
          ellauri222.html on line 207: Actually, these episodes were not entirely invented. Bellow lifted them straight out of “The Brothers Karamazov.” A child tortured by its parents is Ivan Karamazov’s illustration of the problem of evil: what kind of God would allow that to happen? And Herzog with his gun at the window is a reënactment of Dmitri Karamazov, the murder weapon in his hand, spying through the window on his father. Dmitri is caught and convicted of a murder he desired but did not commit. “Herzog,” though, is a comedy. The next day, Herzog gets in a minor traffic accident and the cops discover the loaded gun in his car. But, after some hairy moments in the police station, he is let go. Desperately searching the Great Books for wisdom, Herzog briefly finds himself living in one. He can’t wait to get out.
          ellauri222.html on line 211: But “Ravelstein” is a revenge novel, too. It’s not really about Ravelstein/Bloom. It’s about the narrator, a writer named Chick, who has been treated cruelly by his wife, Vela, a beautiful and brilliant physicist—a wicked caricature of Bellow’s fourth wife, the mathematician Alexandra Ionescu Tulcea. There are also a couple of drive-by take-downs along the way—of Mircea Eliade, a historian of religion at Chicago rumored to have been involved in the fascist Romanian Iron Guard, and of the owner of a restaurant on St. Martin, in the Caribbean, where Bellow contracted a case of food poisoning that nearly killed him. He brings them into the story just to skewer them.
          ellauri222.html on line 213: Podhoretz told Leader that he considered all of Bellow’s characters puppets. And there is something animatronic about them. This is especially true in “Augie March,” where the extended procession of too vivid personalities is like a Wes Anderson movie. Bellow tended to make his characters look the way a child sees grownups, unalterable cartoons, weirdly unself-conscious in their one-dimensionality.
          ellauri222.html on line 215: But there is usually one fully imagined character in Bellow’s books, one character whose impulses the author understands and sympathizes with, whose sufferings elicit his compassion, and whose virtues and defects, egotism and self-doubt, honorable intentions and less than honorable expediencies are examined with surgical precision and unflinching honesty. That character is the protagonist—Augie, Herzog, Chick, even Tommy Wilhelm, in “Seize the Day,” who tries to leverage his pain to win respect. Their real-life counterpart is, of course, Saul Bellow, whose greatest subject was himself.
          ellauri222.html on line 245: Saul's father, Abraham, was a crook and a tyrant, who despised his youngest son's literary ambitions and pummelled him and all his sons.
          ellauri222.html on line 247: Greg makes a distinction between "young Saul", the Marxist and rebel, and "old Saul", the famous author and increasing reactionary. Old Saul was "buried under pessimism, anger, bitterness, intolerance and preoccupations with evil and with his death".
          ellauri222.html on line 249: Saul had women stashed all over town. His self‑justification: his career as an artist entitled him to let people down with impunity. He was married five times in all and infidelity was an issue throughout. Towards the end of his life, Saul asked his son rather charmingly, "Was I a man or a jerk?". It was the right question, and an easy one to answer: A jerk.
          ellauri222.html on line 251: There were a lot of very unhappy people at various points of his life, who felt maligned. Ex-wives high up there. Wives number two and three, Adam's mother and Daniel's took a whipping.
          ellauri222.html on line 255: Bellow was born Solomon Bellow in Lachine, Quebec, in 1915, two years after his parents had arrived there from St Petersburg. When he was nine, the family moved to the Humboldt Park neighbourhood of Chicago. His mother, Liza, died when Saul was 17, but not before she had passed on to him her love of the Jewish Bible (he learned Hebrew at four). His first serious critical success was The Adventures of Augie March (1953), but it was not until his 1964 novel, Herzog, became a bestseller that he earned any real money. His elder brothers, both businessmen, were by this time making serious cash, and regarded him, he once said, as "some schmuck with a pen". Mary Cheever, the wife of John Cheever, believed the two got on so well because "they were both women-haters". He has nothing good to say about feminism. Bellow has a go at Hannah Arendt and Mary McCarthy (the one is "rash", the other "stupid"). In 1994, however, he ate a poisonous fish in the Caribbean, and fell into a coma that lasted five weeks. He dreaded a loss of virility.
          ellauri222.html on line 257: For a man for such small balls, he had huge needs. The writing life needed to be supported. He failed his children; he left them, and it was a wound he carried around like a medal. He knew the cruelty of this. At the very end, though he was not Rosie's father (oops), he was in the house. He and Rosie would watch The Lion King together: in the final, unpleasant stages of his last illness, he was at the point where he didn't mind watching that same film over and over. I was somehow managing Rosie and Saul in the same way." Do they have a relationship with Saul's sons? Not really. Rosie has special needs, and Jänis is focused very much on her. Their house is cozy, not grand, there just happen to be photographs of a Nobel laureate on almost every shelf. Guess which one?
          ellauri222.html on line 259: Jänisrouva sanoi jälkikäteen: He did not want to hurt the people he loved. (Lucky they were so few of them. At 17, he said he hated himself more than melodrama or even spinach.) There wasn't a single part of my being that wasn't able to open up to him (Yeah, I bet). Jänis Bellow was born in Canada. Bellow was one of her professors. She came from a small place, but not too small for Saul to enter. He wasn't exactly tall, but he had this broad upper body, these giant arms, like a sloth."
          ellauri222.html on line 265: this time the overall effect was not satisfactory. I was particularly aware of the absence of distance that the writer must put space between himself and the characters in his book. There should be a certain detachment from the writer's own passions. I speak as one who in Herzog committed the same sin. There I hoped that comic effects might protect me. Nevertheless I crossed the border too many times to raid the enemy camp. But then Herzog was a chump, a failed intellectual and at bottom a sentimentalist. In your case, the man who gives us Eve and Sylphid is an enragé, a fanatic-for-real.
          ellauri222.html on line 267: But that's not the outstanding defect of IMAC. Your reader, out of respect for your powers, is more than willing to go along with you. He will not, as I was not, be able to go along with your Ira, probably the least attractive of all your characters. I assume that you can no more bear Ira than the reader can. But you stand loyally by this cast-iron klutz – a big strong stupid man who attracts you for reasons invisible to me.
          ellauri222.html on line 275: Enough: you will say that all of that is acknowledged in IMAC. Yes, and no. You tell us that Ira is a brute, a murderer. But who else is there? Ira and Eve are at the core of your novel – and what does this pair amount to?
          ellauri222.html on line 288: Vitun paintballspedet rynnäkkökivääreineen ja kevlarliiveineen. Saatanan tyhmät svedupellet länkkärien kurinpitäjät. Tää oli tosin fiktiota Sandhamnin murhissa (vittu suomentajan tollo, morden on murhat, ei murha!) , mutta svedupelleissä tällä on jo vankka faktapohja. Ei tää paljon eroa siitä mitä tapahtuu päivittäin Rinkebyssä ja suomalaisten ilmastoaktivistien laittomissa pidätyxissä ruozinlaivalla. Ja nyt on siellä vallan kahvaan tulossa oikein pesunkestävät ruozinazit. Kuningas Carl Gustav den femte taputtaisi karvaisia käsiään. Kohta ne ovatkin ainoat karvaiset kädet vapaalla jalalla Sveariikissä. Tosin niistä lie jo onnexi nahka lähtenyt.
          ellauri222.html on line 326: serpent into his benumbed mouth. Sinful, deceitful, and given to idle talk.
          ellauri222.html on line 344: Ethelred pakeni Normandiaan vaimonsa Emman ja lastensa kanssa vuonna 1013. Hän pystyi palaamaan Englantiin vasta seuraavan vuoden helmikuussa Svenin kuoltua. Ethelred jatkoi kuninkaana, mutta hänen poikansa Edmund Rautakylki lähti riitauduttuaan isänsä kanssa pohjoiseen, jossa Utred, vaikutusvaltainen northumbrialainen aatelismies, tunnusti hänet hallitsijaksi. Etelässä Svenin poika Knuut Suuri hyökkäsi Wessexiin. Edmund alkoi koota armeijaa häntä vastaan, mutta suuri osa miehistä kieltäytyi taistelemasta ellei Ethelred tulisi johtajaksi. Edmund lähti Lontooseen tapaamaan sairasta isäänsä, mutta on epäselvää tekivätkö he sovinnon.
          ellauri222.html on line 350: William's claim to the English throne derived from his familiar sodomist relationship with the childless Anglo-Saxon king Edward the Confessor, who may have encouraged William's hopes for the throne. Edward died in January 1066 and was succeeded by his brother-in-law Harold Godwinson. The Norwegian king Harald Hardrada invaded northern England in September 1066 and was victorious at the Battle of Fulford on 20 September, but Godwinson's army defeated and killed Hardrada at the Battle of Stamford Bridge on 25 September. Three days later on 28 September, William's invasion force of thousands of men and hundreds of ships landed at Pevensey in Sussex in southern England. Harold marched south to oppose him, leaving a significant portion of his army in the north. Harold's army confronted William's invaders on 14 October at the Battle of Hastings. William's force defeated Harold, who was killed in the engagement, and William became king.
          ellauri222.html on line 359: The foremost theme in The Adventures of Augie March is the search for identity. Unsure of what he wants from life, Augie is pulled along into the schemes of friends and strangers, trying on different identities and learning about the world through jobs ranging from union organizer to eagle trainer to book thief. His path seems random, but as Augie notes, quoting the Greek philosopher Heraclitus, “a man’s character is his fate.” As Augie goes through life, knocking on various doors, these doors of fate open up for him as if by random, but the knocks are unquestionably his own. In the end of the novel, Augie defines his identity as a “Columbus of those near-at-hand,” whose purpose in life is to knock some eggs. Augie notes that “various jobs” are the Rosetta stone, or key, to his entire life. Americans define themselves by their work (having no roots, family or land to stick to), and Augie is a sort of vagabond, trying on different identities as he goes along. Unwilling to limit himself by specializing in any one area, Augie drifts from job to job. He becomes a handbill-distributor, a paperboy, a Woolworth’s stocker, a newsstand clerk, a trinket-seller, a Christmas helper at a department store, a flower delivery boy, a butler, a clerk at fine department stores, a paint salesman, a dog groomer, a book thief, a coal yard worker, a housing inspector, a union organizer, an eagle-trainer, a gambler, a literary researcher, a business machine salesman, a merchant marine, and ultimately an importer-exporter working in wartime Europe. Augie’s job changing is emblematic of the social mobility that is so quintessentially American. Augie is the American Everyman, continually reinventing himself, like Donald Duck. Olemme kaikki oman onnemme Akuja, joopa joo. Yrmf, olet tainnut mainita. You are telling me!
          ellauri222.html on line 361: Grandma Lausch tells Augie, “The more you love people the more they’ll mix you up. A child loves, a person respects. Respect is better than love.” Which is really better, respect or love? The two brothers, Augie and Simon, are on opposite sides of this argument. Augie identifies himself on the side of love. An idealist with a soft heart, he is almost comically susceptible to falling in love, and openly shows his sympathy, even toward the small lizards that are killed by the eagle Caligula. Augie’s vision for an orphan home and academy is driven by his motivation to share love. Simon, on the other hand, prefers respect. He marries Charlotte and stays with her because he admires her business sense, not because he feels romantic love for her. He doesn’t care whether the men at the club love him. In fact, he knows they hate him. But this doesn’t matter to him as long as he is respected. Ultimately, Simon is richer and more successful, but Augie seems happier. What's love got to do with it. What a reptile.
          ellauri222.html on line 363: At the end of the novel, Augie reflects on his vagabond existence and laughs aloud. “That’s the animal ridens in me,” he says, “forever rising up.” He dreaded a loss of virility.
          ellauri222.html on line 365: One of the major themes of the novel is the human tendency toward dishonesty. Augie is not a particularly honest character. He cheats, he steals, and lies quite frequently. Dishonesty characterizes many of the other characters in the novel, including Grandma, Einhorn, Mimi (who lies to doctors that she thinks her pregnancy abnormal), Stella, Agnes, and Mintouchian. The only characters who do not lie or cheat are the simple-minded Mama and Georgie. Lying appears necessary for people to survive in a Machiavellian world. As Mintouchian puts it: “I’m a great admirer of our species. I stand in awe of the genius of the race. But a large part of this genius is devoted to lying and seeming what you are not.” The ethics of the American Jew. The book starts with a lie: I am an American, Chicago born."
          ellauri222.html on line 375: Mr. Anticol is a neighborhood junk dealer and avowed atheist who loves to discourse against religion, having lost his faith after witnessing a massacre of Jews in his town back in Europe.
          ellauri222.html on line 379: Basteshaw is a biophysicist who works as ship’s carpenter on the McManus, the ship Augie is assigned to while in the Merchant Marines during World War II. After their ship is sunk by torpedoes, Augie and Basteshaw are the only survivors and end up on the same lifeboat. Augie gradually realizes that Basteshaw is an insane genius. Convinced that he has the power to create life from protoplasm, he tries to convince Augie to go with him to the Canary Islands and be his research assistant. In reality, their lifeboat is nowhere near the Canary Islands. Basteshaw ties Augie up to stop him from signaling a ship that might rescue them. Finally Augie gets free, ties up Basteshaw, and manages to signal a British tanker to rescue them.
          ellauri222.html on line 387: Betzhevski is a red-headed Polish barber and tenant of Einhorn’s who leads a protest against Einhorn for his unethical behavior as a landlord. Einhorn evicts him.
          ellauri222.html on line 423: Dingbat is the half brother of William Einhorn. He dresses like a gangster and is taken up with gang events and crime, although not a criminal himself. He spends much of his time hanging around the family’s poolroom, Einhorn Billiards. He also tries work as a fight promoter, but is not successful.
          ellauri222.html on line 427: Arthur Einhorn is William Einhorn’s son who is in college at the University of Illinois in Champaign. An intellectual who studies poetry and wants to write scholarly books, he falls in love with Mimi. His relationship with his father is strained after Arthur has a baby and then divorces his wife, leaving the child to be raised by his parents.
          ellauri222.html on line 431: Tillie Einhorn is William Einhorn’s wife. A heavy, attractive lady, she worshipfully obeys her husband and tolerates, or overlooks, his extramarital affairs. After the stock market crash, she helps make money by running a cafeteria inside the poolroom.
          ellauri222.html on line 435: Einhorn is a highly intelligent and wealthy real-estate broker whom Augie goes to work for while still a junior in high school. As Einhorn is crippled and wheelchair-bound, Augie carries him to and from the car and assists him in other daily activities. Einhorn loses almost everything in the great stock market crash, but works hard to build his business up again.
          ellauri222.html on line 451: Old Fenchel is the fat, black-eyed uncle of Thea and Esther. He is in the mineral water business and the girls are his heiresses. His wife is sickly, timid, and silent.
          ellauri222.html on line 507: Jimmy Klein is a boyhood friend of Augie’s; Grandma Lausch doesn’t approve of him. He is sociable and spirited, slight and dark-faced, witty-looking. Augie is welcome at Jimmy’s house and gets to know his whole family, who are all friendly and generous with gifts and money. Jimmy and Augie get into trouble for stealing money at Deever’s department store, where they work during the Christmas season. Years later, Jimmy catches Augie stealing books. He reveals that he has taken a rough path in life: he got a girl pregnant and had to marry her.
          ellauri222.html on line 531: Grandma Lausch, although unrelated by blood to the Marches, is a surrogate grandmother to Augie and his brothers, and has a powerful influence on them both. She rules their childhood house with a strict, imperious, and shrewd manner. The widow of a powerful Odessa businessman, this grande dame claims to speak a variety of languages and passes the time reading Tolstoy. Her two sons are married and living in other states. When Grandma’s mind begins to fail, they commit the dignified old lady to a retirement home where she eventually dies of pneumonia.
          ellauri222.html on line 555: Augie, the hero of the novel, is a Jewish-American boy coming of age in Depression-era Chicago. Since their father abandoned the family, Augie and his two brothers are raised by their slow-witted mother and surrogate “Grandma” Lausch. Augie, good-looking with “tall hair” and green-gray eyes, is a soft-hearted young man whose sympathy for others often gets him into trouble. He holds a variety of jobs throughout his life and learns from different people he encounters. People tend to “adopt” Augie and try to groom him into the person they want him to be, but he really wants to become his own person. The name Augie is short for “August,” which means “Great.” Augie has a desire for greatness, but he has no idea of how to do it, thinking it beyond his ability to “breathe the pointy, star-furnished air at its highest difficulty.” He goes along through life repeating the same mistakes. In the end, Augie realizes that his life has been a voyage of discovery. Whether or not he has been a success, he doesn’t know, but he will continue with unquenchable optimism and hope, “forever rising up.”
          ellauri222.html on line 567: Simon is Augie’s older brother. Tall, good-looking, and blond, Simon has a self-assurance and sense of direction that Augie does not. He thinks Augie is too soft-hearted. After being jilted by his girlfriend Cissy Flexner, Simon marries the coal heiress Charlotte Magnus and becomes rich through multiple business ventures. Simon is very successful, but not content. Although he respects Charlotte for her business sense, his marriage lacks romantic love. His mistress, Renée, uses him for his money. Augie pities him because he cannot have children.
          ellauri222.html on line 571: Harold Mintouchian is a wealthy, distinguished Armenian lawyer and international businessman who is the married lover of a friend of Stella’s and becomes a close friend and mentor of Augie. At the end of the novel, Augie works for him as a black market trader in Europe. Augie looks up to the older man as “a sage, prophet, or guru, a prince of experience with his jewel toes” and seeks his wisdom. Mintouchian, who has seen much of the darker side of human nature through his law practice, has more realistic ideas than the love-bitten Augie about what to expect from human relationships. Secrecy and lies, he tells Augie, are unavoidable. “Mind you, I’m a great admirer of our species. I stand in awe of the genius of the race. But a large part of this genius is devoted to lying and seeming what you are not.” He confesses to Augie that his mistress, Agnes, is keeping secrets from him, while he is keeping secrets from his wife.
          ellauri222.html on line 587: Nails Nagel is a fighter promoted by Dingbat. He loses nearly all of his fights.
          ellauri222.html on line 595: Lieutenant Nuzzo is an Italian-American cop whom Simon befriends as he begins to build his coal business.
          ellauri222.html on line 599: Kayo Obermark is Mimi and Augie’s neighbor in the student boarding house. Kayo, an unkempt university student, is melancholy and brilliant. He shares with Augie his philosophy that “everyone has bitterness in his chosen thing.”
          ellauri222.html on line 623: Renée is the young, beautiful, blond mistress of Simon. Simon spends his days with Renée, but goes home each night to Charlotte. Renée becomes angry and jealous because Simon never intends to leave his wife. When Charlotte finds out about the affair and demands a stop to it, Renée attempts suicide by swallowing pills (apparently an attention-getting gesture), and claims (falsely) that she is pregnant with Simon’s baby. She causes a scandal, opening a lawsuit against Simon. Charlotte and Simon have to go to court to fend her off.
          ellauri222.html on line 631: A miserly millionaire with a stuttering problem, Robey is working on a book he calls The Needle’s Eye, an investigation into the nature and source of happiness. He hires Augie as a research assistant. As Augie listens to Robey discuss his book idea, he finds that the man makes sense only part of the time. He realizes that Robey is a “crank” who only wants someone to be an ear for his half-baked ideas.
          ellauri222.html on line 651: Mildred Stark is a crippled girl who goes to work for Einhorn after the stock-market crash and becomes his mistress. She is aged about thirty and heavy, but Einhorn is flattered that she is in love with him. Mildred dislikes Augie.
          ellauri222.html on line 659: Stoney and Wolfy are fellow travelers hitching free rides on the trains, whom Augie meets while traveling back to Chicago after Joe Gorman’s arrest. The police arrest all three thinking they are a gang of car thieves. Stoney is a young man on his way to veterinary school; Wolfy has a criminal record.
          ellauri222.html on line 671: Clem, the younger of Tambow’s two sons, and the cousin of Jimmy Klein, is a good friend to Augie. He is an easy spender and refuses to work, preferring to beg money off his father. When his father dies, he inherits his money. He has a crush on Mimi. Clem eventually goes to the University of Chicago, earning a degree in psychology, and invites Augie to join him in a counseling practice. Augie has a great deal of affection for Clem. Clem is the audience for Augie’s speech about “axial lines.”
          ellauri222.html on line 675: The older of Tambow’s two sons, Donald is the handsome one. He has black curly hair like his mother. He goes into show business.
          ellauri222.html on line 679: Tambow is Jimmy Klein’s uncle, a “big wheel” in Republican ward politics. Jimmy and Augie pass out campaign literature and do other odd jobs for him. Tambow is divorced and his own sons, Donald and Clem, refuse to work for him. He dies and leaves all his money to Clem and Donald.
          ellauri222.html on line 683: The mother of Donald and Clem, Mrs. Tambow has remarried. She is handsome and dignified, with black curly hair and a pince nez. Clem teases her for being lecherous. He thinks his mother even lusts for Augie.
          ellauri222.html on line 690: A cousin of the Magnuses, Weintraub spies Augie leaving the abortionist’s with Mimi. He tells the Magnuses, thus destroying Augie’s reputation with the family and causing his breakup with Lucy.
          ellauri222.html on line 694: Dr. Wernick is a neighborhood dentist who fits Grandma Lausch with false teeth. She calls him a butcher because he treats his patients so roughly.
          ellauri222.html on line 699: William Moulton Marston (May 9, 1893 – May 2, 1947), also known by the pen name Charles Moulton (/ˈmoʊltən/), was an American psychologist who, with his wife Elizabeth Holloway, invented an early prototype of the lie detector. Two women, his wife Elizabeth Holloway Marston, and their polygamous life partner, Olive Byrne, greatly influenced Wonder Woman's creation. She was inducted into the Comic Book Hall of Fame in 2006.
          ellauri222.html on line 703: Wily and his 2 hens were great fans of bondage. "The only hope for peace is to teach people who are full of pep and unbound force to enjoy being bound... Only when the control of self by others is more pleasant than the unbound assertion of self in human relationships can we hope for a stable, peaceful human society... Giving arse to others, being controlled by them, submitting to other people cannot possibly be enjoyable without a strong erotic element."
          ellauri222.html on line 709: Through his Wonder Woman comics, he aimed to condition readers to becoming more readily accepting of loving submission to loving authorities rather than being so assertive with their own destructive egos. About male readers, he later wrote: "Give them an alluring woman stronger than themselves to submit to, and they'll be proud to become her willing slaves!"
          ellauri222.html on line 711: William Moulton Marston died of cancer on May 2, 1947, in Rye, seven days before his 54th birthday. After his death, Elizabeth and Olive continued to live together until Olive's death in 1990, aged 86; Elizabeth (The Wonder Woman) died in 1993, aged 100.
          ellauri222.html on line 735: Augie on tyyten kirjoitettu ulkomailla, enimmäxeen Ranskassa. Se kyllä näkyy siitä. Samanlaista expatriaattifiilistä kuin Ernestolla. Bellow traveled widely throughout his life, mainly to Europe, which he sometimes visited twice a year. As a young man, Bellow went to Mexico City to meet Leon Trotsky, but the expatriate Russian revolutionary was assassinated the day before they were to meet.
          ellauri222.html on line 739: Before discussing some of the minor characters in this story, it should be borne in mind that each of them can be analyzed in connection with Candide who may accept or reject their beliefs or principles. Among such supplementary characters, we can single out Lord Pococurante. To a certain degree, even his name is symbolic; the word “pococurante” is of Italian origin and it can be translated into English as indifferent. He perfectly corresponds to his name. At the very beginning of the fifteenth chapter, Voltaire makes the reader feel that Lord Pococurante is tired of everything. He says, “I make them lie with me sometimes, for I am very tired of the ladies of the town, of their coquetries, of their jealousies, of their quarrels, of their humors, of their pettinesses, of their pride, of their follies” (Voltaire, 70)
          ellauri222.html on line 741: Certainly, some of the previously mentioned can be very tiresome, but this character assumes such an attitude towards everything. The lord can be characterized by perfectionism; he demands excellence from everyone and everything surrounding him. Overall, perfectionism is a positive quality because it stimulates a person to improve oneself but in his case, it becomes grotesque, because Lord Pococurante rejects everything that allegedly does not meet his standards.
          ellauri222.html on line 745: The question arises why Voltaire inserts such a character in the novella, and what functions he performs in the story. On the one hand, Lord Pococurante embodies the then French aristocracy, the social class, surfeited with everything. The author attracts the reader’s attention to a very curious paradox: people, who live in luxury, cannot enjoy it. Though it is not explicitly stated by Voltaire, such people are doomed to failure. At this point, we can say with certainty that Voltaire is prophetic in this novella.
          ellauri222.html on line 749: Apart from that, this character demands perfection only from other people, he never attempts to apply this principle to himself and it makes him a slightly comic figure. Lord Pococurante is neither artist, nor writer, but he takes faults with the world masterpieces, which is absurd in its core. Nevertheless, many people deem themselves quite competent for criticizing, having never created any work of art.
          ellauri222.html on line 757: Saul Bellow is widely recognized as America's preeminent living novelist. His fiction, which is as intellectually demanding as it is imaginatively appealing, steadfastly affirms the value of the human soul while simultaneously recognizing the claims of community and the demoralizing inauthenticity of daily life. Refusing to give in to the pessimism and despair that threaten to overwhelm American experience, Bellow offers a persistently optimistic, though often tentative and ambiguous, alternative to postmodern alienation. In their struggle to understand their past and reorder their present, his protagonists chart a course of possibility for all who would live meaningfully in urban American society and make loads of money.
          ellauri222.html on line 763: This grooming of the self paradoxically requires looking out for number 1. Nowhere is this fact more vividly portrayed than in Henderson the Rain King. Driven in the beginning by a relentless inner voice that repeats, "I want! I want!," Henderson's egoistic absorption in his material success ironically alienates him from himself. Hitching his family to seek fundamental truths in the wilderness of Africa, he discovers the arse loving relationship that men need with nature and with each other and symbolically surrenders his self by accepting responsibility for a lion cub and an orphan child.
          ellauri222.html on line 767: In their quest to find the beaver that gives meaning to life, Bellow's protagonists must also come to terms with death. The message Bellow conveys in almost all of his novels is that one must fear death to know the meaning of life and what it means to be human. Henderson overcomes his fear of death when he is buried and symbolically resurrected in the African king Dahfu's experiment. Similarly, in Seize the Day, Tommy Wilhelm confronts death in a symbolic drowning. Charlie Citrine in Humboldt's Gift echoes Whitman in viewing death as the essential question, pointing out that it is only through death that Sauls can complete the cycle of life by liberating self from the body. Bellow's meditations on death darken in Mr. Sammler's Planet and The Dean's December. While the title character in Mr. Sammler's Planet eagerly awaits the death of the person he most values in the world, Bellow contemplates the approaching death of Western culture at the hands of those who have abandoned humanistic values. The Dean's December presents an apocalyptic vision of urban decay in a Chicago totally lacking the comic touches that soften Charlie Citrone's portrait of this same city as a "moronic inferno" in Humboldt's Gift. An uncharacteristically bleak yarn from he old standup comic. With More Die of Heartbreak and the recent novellas, however, Bellow returns to his more characteristic blend of pathos and farce in contemplating the relationship between life and death. In the recent Ravelstein, Bellow once again charts this essential confrontation when Saul recounts not only his best friend's death from AIDS but also his own near-death experience from food poisoning. Through this foreground, in a fictionalized memoir to his own gay friend Allan Bloom, Bellow reveals the resilient love and tenderness that offer the modern world its saving grace.
          ellauri222.html on line 773: Some common synonyms of gay are animated, lively, sprightly, and vivacious. While all these words mean "keenly alive and spirited," gay stresses complete freedom from care and overflowing spirits. the gay spirit of Paris in the 1920s. Bellow and his gay chummies in Chicago.
          ellauri222.html on line 791: Because Bellow refuses to devalue human potential in even his bleakest scenarios, his novels often come under attack for their affirmative endings. Augie hails himself as a new Columbus, the rediscoverer of America; Henderson, while triumphantly returning home with his new charges, dances with glee, "leaping, leaping, pounding, and tingling over the pure white lining of the grey Arctic silence." Herzog inexplicably evades his fate, emerging from the flux of his tortured mind to reclaim his sanity and his confidence in the future. Yet, the victories of Bellow's heroes are not unqualified, but rather as ambiguous and tenuous as is the human condition itself. As a new Columbus, Augie speaks from exile in Europe; in holding the orphan child, Henderson recalls the pain of his separation from his own father; by renouncing his self-pity and his murderous rage at his ex-wife Madeleine, Herzog reduces but does not expiate his guilt. Nonetheless, these characters earn whatever spiritual victory they reap through their penes and their refusal to succumb to doubt and cynicism. Through their perseverance in seeking the truth of human existence, they ultimately renew themselves by transcending to an intuitive spiritual awareness that is no less real because it must be taken on faith.
          ellauri222.html on line 793: In all of Bellow's works, an appreciation of the cultural context in which his protagonists struggle is essential to understanding these characters and their search for renewal. Bellow's vision centers almost exclusively on Jewish male experience in contemporary urban America. Proud of their heritage, his heroes are usually second-generation Jewish immigrants who seek to discover how they can live meaningfully in their American present while honoring their skinless knobs. Much of their ability to maintain their belief in humanity despite their knowledge of the world can be attributed to the affirmative nature of the Jewish culture. Bellovian heroes live in a WASP society in which they are only partially assimilated. However, as Jews have done historically, they maintain their concern for morality and community despite their cultural displacement.
          ellauri222.html on line 795: Though in some ways separated from American society, Bellow's protagonists also strongly connect their identity with America. Augie begins his adventures by claiming, "I am an American, Chicago born—Chicago, that somber city." Almost all of Bellow's novels take place in an American city, most often Chicago or New York. Through his depiction of urban reality, Bellow anchors his novels in the actual world, and he uses the city as his central metaphor for contemporary materialism. Although recognizing the importance of history and memory, Bellow's novels maintain a constant engagement with the present moment. His characters move in the real world, confronting sensuous images of urban chaos and clutter that often threaten to overwhelm them. Looking down on the Hudson River, Tommy Wilhelm sees "tugs with matted beards of cordage" and "the red bones of new apartments rising on the bluffs." Sammler denounces contemporary New Yorkers for the "free ways of barbarism" that they practice beneath the guise of "civilized order, property rights [and] refined technological organization." In Humboldt's Gift, which is replete with images of cannibalism and vampirism, Charlie Citrone sees Von Trenck, the source of his material success, as "the blood-scent that attracted the sharks of Chicago." Acknowledging the influence of the city on his fiction, Bellow himself has remarked, "I don't know how I could possibly separate my knowledge of life such as it is, from the city. I could no more tell you how deeply it's gotten into my bones than the lady who paints radium dials in the clock factory can tell you." However, although the city serves to identify the deterministic social pressures that threaten to destroy civilization, Bellow's heroes refuse to become its victims and instead draw on their latent nondeterministic resources of vitality to reassert their uniquely American belief in individual freedom, as well as their faith in the possibility of community.
          ellauri222.html on line 797: Except for Clara Velde in A Theft, the protagonists in Bellow's novels and novellas are all male. The Bellovian hero typically seeks erotic pleasure, emotional security, and egoistic confirmation from the women in his life. In marriage, his relationships with women are conflicted, and he often retreats from his role as husband to a sensuous but selfish and demanding wife who paradoxically represents both his yearning for freewheeling sex happiness and society's pressure to relinquish the freedom so essential to his self-realization. Like his male characters who all are Saul lookalikes, Bellow's females are often interchangeable and serve roles of little dramatic import. However, although the author has come under increasing criticism for his superficial treatment of women, his depiction of women and male-female relationships serves to reinforce the psychological crisis that each male protagonist must negotiate to empty their scrotums so as to achieve peace and fulfillment.
          ellauri222.html on line 799: Stylistically, Bellow's fiction reflects some of the same tensions that his protagonists seek to balance. His concern with social and personal destruction has been traced to the common run of European writers such as Flaubert, Dostoevsky, Kafka, Sartre, and Camus. But Bellow's fiction also has many ties to the American literary tradition. His neotranscendentalism (what? Emersonian tomfoolery I guess), his identification with America, and the loose form of his most acclaimed novels link him most obviously to Emerson and Whitman.
          ellauri222.html on line 819: An intensely intellectual writer who peppers his novels with allusions, Bellow draws on many cultural traditions in his analysis of both the sources of American experience and its present manifestations. His fiction fully documents the decline of Western civilization without conceding its obvious demise, and the ambiguity and tenuousness of even his most positive endings balance sadness and comic skepticism with the steadfast faith that he the artist can effect coherence and order, or failing that a lot of cash, out of the chaos of modern experience. His tip for success: kusettakaa minkä jaxatte! For his achievement in confronting the modern existential dilemma with compassion and humor, Bellow's place in twentieth-century American literary history seems assured by drooling groupies like myself.
          ellauri222.html on line 837: British critics tend to regard the American predilection for Big Novels as a vulgar neurosis — like the American predilection for big cars or big hamburgers. Oh God, we think: here comes another sweating, free-dreaming maniac with another thousand-pager; here comes another Big Mac. First, Dos Passos produced the Great American Novel; now they all want one. Yet in a sense every ambitious American novelist is genuinely trying to write a novel called USA. Perhaps this isn’t just a foible; perhaps it is an inescapable response to America – twentieth-century America, racially mixed and mobile, twenty-four hour, endless, extreme, superabundantly various. American novels are big all right, but partly because America is big too. You need plenty of nerve, ink and energy to do justice to the place, and no one has made greater efforts than Saul Bellow. In 1976 Bellow was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature, praised by the Swedes ‘for human understanding and subtle analysis of contemporary culture’. Many times in Bellow’s novels we are reminded that ‘being human’ isn’t the automatic condition of every human being. Like freedom or sanity, it is not a given but a gift, a talent, an accomplishment, an objective. The busiest sections of the Chicago bookstores, I noticed, were those marked ‘Personal Growth’.
          ellauri222.html on line 886: Ozymandias (/ˌɒziˈmændiəs/ oz-ee-MAN-dee-əs; real name Adrian Alexander Veidt) is a fictional anti-villain in the graphic novel limited series Watchmen, published by DC Comics. Created by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, named "Ozymandias" in the manner of Ramesses II, his name recalls the famous poem by Percy Bysshe Shelley, which takes as its theme the fleeting nature of empire and is excerpted as the epigraph of one of the chapters of Watchmen. Ozymandias is ranked number 25 on Wizard's Top 200 Comic Book Characters list and number 21 on IGN's Top 100 Villains list. No, wait, Ozymandias was a Greek name for the pharaoh Ramesses II (r. 1279–1213 BC), derived from a part of his throne name, Usermaatre. In 1817, Shelley began writing the poem "Ozymandias", after the British Museum acquired the Younger Memnon, a head-and-torso fragment of a statue of Ramesses II, which dated from the 13th century BC. Earlier, in 1816, the Italian archeologist Giovanni Battista Belzoni had "removed" the 7.25-short-ton (6.58 t; 6,580 kg) statue fragment from the Ramesseum, the mortuary temple of Ramesses II at Thebes, Egypt. The reputation of the statue fragment preceded its arrival to Western Europe; after his Egyptian expedition in 1798, Napoleon Bonaparte had failed to acquire the Younger Memnon for France. Although the British Museum expected delivery of the antiquity in 1818, the Younger Memnon did not arrive in London until 1821. Shelley published his poems before the statue fragment of Ozymandias arrived in Britain, and the view of modern scholarship is that Shelley never saw the statue, although he might have learned about it from news reports, as it was well known even in its previous location near Luxor.
          ellauri222.html on line 888: The book Les Ruines, ou méditations sur les révolutions des empires (1791) by Constantin François de Chassebœuf, comte de Volney (1757–1820), first published in an English translation as The Ruins, or a Survey of the Revolutions of Empires (London: Joseph Johnson, 1792) by James Marshall, was an influence on Shelley. helley had explored similar themes in his 1813 work Queen Mab. Typically, Shelley published his literary works either anonymously or pseudonymously, under the name "Glirastes", a Graeco-Latin name created by combining the Latin glīs ("dormouse") with the Greek suffix ἐραστής (erastēs, "lover", vitut se on mikään suffixi!); the Glirastes name referred to his wife, Mary Shelley, whom he nicknamed "dormouse". Unikeon köyrijä. Mäuschen, sanoi Percy Marylle niikö Pikin kreikkalainen poikaystävä, setämäinen Kleomenis.
          ellauri222.html on line 959: Calm this storm for a moment.
          ellauri222.html on line 968: This melody is sung by the chassidim at their gatherings, in moments of deep soul-searching.

          ellauri222.html on line 970: Click here to order this CD online

          ellauri222.html on line 988: Master of the world, I plead to You with all my heart in this prayer…

          ellauri222.html on line 996: Ellsworth Huntington, (born Sept. 16, 1876, Galesburg, Ill., U.S.—died Oct. 17, 1947, New Haven, Conn.), U.S. geographer who explored the influence of climate on civilization. Ellsworth Huntington (September 16, 1876 – October 17, 1947) was a professor of geography at Yale University during the early 20th century, known for his studies on environmental determinism/climatic determinism, economic growth, economic geography, and scientific racism. He served as President of the Ecological Society of America in 1917, the Association of American Geographers in 1923 and President of the Board of Directors of the American Eugenics Society from 1934 to 1938.
          ellauri222.html on line 1003: Ellsworth Huntington travelled continental Europe in hopes of better understanding the connection between climate and state success, publishing his findings in The Pulse of Asia, and further elaborating in Civilization and Climate. Like the political geographers, a crucial component of his work was the belief that the climate of North-western Europe was ideal, with areas further north being too cold, and areas further south being too hot, resulting in lazy, laid-back populations. These ideas have powerful connections to colonialism, and may have played a role in the creation of the 'other' and the literature that many used to justify taking advantage of less advanced nations. Who needs Proust or Tolstoy when it suffices to reach up to get a banana.
          ellauri222.html on line 1012: Pyhä Blasius oli legendan mukaan hurskas eläinlääkäri, joka valittiin aikanaan kotikaupunkinsa Sebasteian piispaksi, ja toimi rohkeasti paikallisten kristittyjen johtajana vainon aikana. Hän vetäytyi myöhemmin peliluolaan kaupungin lähistöllä, ja eli siellä rukoillen muiden pelimiesten puolesta ja siunaten ja parantaen villieläimiä. Keisari Liciniuksen aikana v. 316 paikallinen maaherra aloitti vainot. Hänen miehensä löysivät Blasiuksen lemmikit etsiessään petoja, joille kristityt voitaisiin syöttää. Kun häntä vietiin Sebasteiaan, hän paransi erään naisen pojan, joka oli tukehtumassa kurkussaan olevaan ruotoon. Blasiusta kidutettiin tästä hyvästä pieksemällä häntä kepeillä ja repimällä hänen ihoaan villan karstauksessa käytetyillä piikeillä. Hyväxi lopuksi hänet mestattiin.
          ellauri222.html on line 1035: On July 29, 1994, Timmendequas lured Megan into his home, hit her head against his dresser, slapped her hard enough to draw blood, raped her, and strangled her with a belt. During the attack, Megan was able to bite Timmendequas’ hand hard enough to leave teeth impressions which later helped convict him. He disposed of her body in a nearby park and confessed to the murder the next day. He was found guilty of kidnapping, aggravated sexual assault, and murder and sentenced to death. Timmendequas’ sentence was commuted to life in 2007 when New Jersey abolished the death penalty.
          ellauri222.html on line 1040: Henry admired Timmendiquas. He respected the Wyandots. He could not blame the Indian who fought for his hunting grounds, but, with all the strength of his strong nature, he despised and hated every renegade. Girty knew that the great White Lightning did not like him, and he knew why. Timmendiquas believed that a man should be loyal to his own race, and in his heart he must regard the renegade as what he was—a traitor. "The youth called the Ware fights for his own people," said Timmendiquas gravely.
          ellauri222.html on line 1047: "The Dove runs well," murmured Timmendiquas in English. Timmendiquas, with Henry at his side, was among the first to give approval, but the crestfallen renegades remained in their little group at the edge of the field. Hei täähän on amerikkalaista jalkapalloa!
          ellauri222.html on line 1051: Meanwhile, Zimmermann gave an inflammatory speech to his followers. You are here," he cried, "warriors and men of many tribes, Shawnee, Miami, Delaware, Illinois, Ottawa, and Wyandot. All who live in the valley north of the Ohio and east of the Mississippi are here. You are brave men. Sometimes you have fought with one another. In this strife all have won victory and all have suffered defeat. But you lived the life that Manitou made you to live, and you were happy, in your own way, in a great and fair land that is filled with game.
          ellauri222.html on line 1053: "But a new enemy has come, and, like the buffalo on the far western plains, his numbers are past counting. When one is slain five grow in his place. When Manitou made the white man he planted in his soul the wish to possess all the earth, and he strives night and day to achieve his wish. While he lives he does not turn back, and dead, his bones claim the ground in which they lie. He may be afraid of the forest and the warrior. The growl of the bear and the scream of the panther may make him tremble, but, trembling, he yet comes."
          ellauri222.html on line 1054: The white man," he resumed, "respects no land but his own. If it does not belong to himself he thinks that it belongs to nobody, and that Manitou merely keeps it in waiting for him. He is here now with his women and children in the land that we and our fathers have owned since the beginning of time. Many of the white men have fallen beneath our bullets and tomahawks. We have burned their new houses and uprooted their corn, but they are more than they were last year, and next year they will be more than they are now."
          ellauri222.html on line 1057: "The men of our race are brave, they are warriors, they have not yielded humbly to the coming of the white man. We have fought him many times. Many of the white scalps are in our wigwams. Sometimes Manitou has given to us the victory, and again he has given it to this foe of ours who would eat up our whole country. We were beaten in the attack on the place they call Wareville, we were beaten again in the attack on the great wagon train, and we have failed now in our efforts against the fort and the fleet. Warriors of the allied tribes, is it not so?"
          ellauri222.html on line 1060: "If we don´t strike hard at this chief Timmendiquas and his men, they will strike hard at us." The savages, seizing their weapons, sprang forth to the conflict. With the Wyandots and the bravest of the Shawnees and Miamis Zimmerman still held the ground where a group of tepees stood, and many men fell dead or wounded before them. Adam Colfax and Major Braithwaite met in the prairie, and in their excitement and joy wrung each other´s hands.
          ellauri222.html on line 1061: "A major triumph!" exclaimed the Major. "Yes, but we must push it home!" said the stern Puritan, his face a red glow, as he pointed toward the tepee where Timmendiquas and the flower of the warriors still fought.
          ellauri222.html on line 1063: Henry looked down the sights straight into the face of the Indian, and beheld Timmendiquas, the great White Lightning of the Wyandots. Timmendiquas saw the flash of recognition on the boy´s face and smiled faintly. "Shoot," he said. "You have won the chance." Conflicting emotions filled the soul of Henry Ware. If he spared Timmendiquas it would cost the border many lives. The Wyandot chief could never be anything but the implacable foe of those who were invading the red man´s hunting grounds. But Henry remembered that this man had saved his life. He had spared him when he was compelled to run the gantlet. The boy could not shoot.
          ellauri222.html on line 1064: "Go!" he said, lowering his rifle. "You gave me my life, and I give you yours."
          ellauri222.html on line 1080: Sir Walter Raleigh was one of the most famous explorers of Elizabeth I's reign. His courage and good looks made him a favourite of the Queen's, and she rewarded him for his handsomeness. Raleigh was also a scholar and a poet, but he is usually remembered for introducing the essential potato, and the addictive tobacco.
          ellauri223.html on line 56: Mr. Strangelove is the foremost magistrate in attending to the charge of the race. He sees that men and women are so joined together, that they bring forth the best offspring. Indeed, they laugh at us who exhibit a studious care for our breed of horses and dogs, but neglect the breeding of human beings. Thus the education of the children is under his rule, and whatever has any reference to food, clothing, and the intercourse of the sexes. Love himself is ruler, but there are many male and female magistrates dedicated to these arts.
          ellauri223.html on line 58: Although the community of wives is not instituted among the other inhabitants of their province, among them it is in use after this manner: All things are common with them, and their dispensation is by the authority of the magistrates. Arts and honors and pleasures are common, and are held in such a manner that no one can appropriate anything to himself. Hey Tommaso, hold your horses, the end of the line is over there!
          ellauri223.html on line 60: They say that all private property is acquired and improved for the reason that each one of us by himself has his own home and wife and children. From this, self-love springs. For when we raise a son to riches and dignities, and leave an heir to much wealth, we become either ready to grasp at the property of the State, if in any case fear should be removed from the power which belongs to riches and rank; or avaricious, crafty, and hypocritical, if anyone is of slender purse, little strength, and mean ancestry. But when we have taken away self-love, there remains only love for the State.
          ellauri223.html on line 64: There are occupations, mechanical and theoretical, common to both men and women, with this difference, that the occupations which require more hard work, and walking a long distance, are practised by men, such as ploughing, sowing, gathering the fruits, working at the threshing-floor, stock exchange, and perchance at the vintage. But it is customary to choose women for milking the cows and for making cheese. In like manner, they go to the gardens near to the outskirts of the city both for collecting the plants and for cultivating them. In fact, all sedentary and stationary pursuits are practised by the women, such as weaving, spinning, sewing, cutting the hair, shaving, dispensing medicines, selling arse, and making all kinds of garments. They are, however, excluded from working in wood and the manufacture of arms. If a woman is fit to paint, she is not prevented from doing so; nevertheless, music (song and dance) is given over to the women alone, because they please the more, and of a truth to pretty boys also. But the women have not the practise of the drum and the horn. Pretty boys take care of faggots.
          ellauri223.html on line 66: Capt. Moreover, the race is managed for the good of the commonwealth, and not of private individuals, and the magistrates must be obeyed. They deny what we hold—viz., that it is natural to man to recognize his offspring and to educate them, and to use his wife and house and children as his own. For they say that children are bred for the preservation of the species and not for individual pleasure, as St. Thomas also asserts. Therefore the breeding of children has reference to the commonwealth, and not to individuals, except in so far as they are constituents of the commonwealth. And since individuals for the most part bring forth children wrongly and educate them wrongly, they consider that they remove destruction from the State, and therefore for this reason, with most sacred fear, they commit the education of the children, who, as it were, are the element of the republic, to the care of magistrates; for the safety of the community is not that of a few. And thus they distribute male and female breeders of the best natures according to philosophical rules. Plato thinks that this distribution ought to be made by lot, lest some incel men seeing that they are kept away from the beautiful women, should rise up with anger and hatred against the magistrates; and he thinks further that those who do not deserve cohabitation with the more beautiful women, should be deceived while the lots are drawn by the magistrates, so that at all times the women who are suitably second rate should fall to their lot, not those whom they desire. Stop the steal!
          ellauri223.html on line 68: This shrewdness, however, is not necessary among the inhabitants of the City of the Sun. For with them deformity is unknown. When the women are exercised they get a clear complexion, and become strong of limb, tall and agile, and with them beauty consists in tallness and strength. Tanakka, punakka ja rivakka, täst mie piän! Therefore, if any woman dyes her face, so that it may become beautiful, or uses high-heeled boots so that she may appear tall, or garments with trains to cover her wooden shoes, she is condemned to capital punishment. But if the women should even desire them they have no facility for doing these things. For who indeed would give them this facility? Further, they assert that among us abuses of this kind arise from the leisure and sloth of women. By these means they lose their color and have pale complexions, and become feeble and small. For this reason they are without proper complexions, use high sandals, and become beautiful not from strength, but from slothful tenderness. And thus they ruin their own tempers and natures, and consequently those of their offspring. Furthermore, if at any time a man is taken captive with ardent love for a certain woman, the two are allowed to converse and joke together and to give one another garlands of flowers or leaves, and to make verses. But if the race is endangered, by no means is further union between them permitted. Her fanny must be locked in a love girdle, and his pecker lassoed and bound behind his butt. Moreover, the love born of eager desire is not known among them; only that born of friendship. LOL
          ellauri223.html on line 70: Domestic affairs and partnerships are of little account, because, excepting the sign of honor, each one receives what he is in need of. To the heroes and heroines of the republic, it is customary to give the pleasing gifts of honor, beautiful wreaths, sweet food, heroine, or splendid clothes, while they are feasting. In the daytime all use white garments within the city, but at night or outside the city they use red garments either of wool or silk. They hate black as they do dung, and therefore they dislike the Japanese, who are fond of black, and Africans, for obvious reasons. Pride they consider the most execrable vice, and one who acts proudly is chastised with the most ruthless correction. Wherefore no one thinks it lowering to wait at table or to work in the kitchen or fields or clean the toilets. All work they call discipline, and thus they say that it is honorable to go on foot, to do any act of nature, to see with the eye, and to speak with the tongue, and waft with the tail; and when there is need, they distinguish philosophically between tears and spittle. Every man who, when he is told off to work, does his duty, is considered very honorable.
          ellauri223.html on line 72: But in the City of the Sun, while duty and work are distributed among all, it only falls to each one to work for about four hours every day. The remaining hours are spent in learning joyously, in debating, in reading, in reciting, in writing, in walking, in exercising the mind and body, and with play. They allow no game which is played while sitting or lying on top of one another, neither the single die nor dice, nor chess, nor others like these. But they play with the ball, with the sack, with the rod, with the hoop, with wrestling, with scratching matches at the stake. They say, moreover, that grinding poverty renders men worthless, cunning, sulky, thievish, insidious, vagabonds, liars, false witnesses, etc.; and that wealth makes them insolent, proud, ignorant, traitors, assumers of what they know not, deceivers, boasters, wanting in affection, slanderers, etc. But with them all the rich and poor together make up the community. They are rich because they want nothing, poor because they possess nothing. Hey is this communism or what?
          ellauri223.html on line 74: G.M. This seems excellent and sacred, but the community of women is a thing too difficult to attain. The holy Roman Clement says that wives ought to be common in accordance with the apostolic institution, and praises Plato and Socrates, who thus teach, but the Glossary interprets this community with regard to obedience. And Tertullian agrees with the Glossary, that the first Christians had everything in common except wives.
          ellauri223.html on line 76: They are unwilling that the State should be corrupted by the vicious customs of slaves and foreigners. Therefore they do business at the gates, and sell only those whom they have taken in war or keep them for digging ditches and other hard work without the city, and for this reason they always send four bands of soldiers to take care of the fields, and with them there are the laborers.
          ellauri223.html on line 80: They have an abundance of all things, since everyone likes to be industrious, their labors being slight and profitable. They are docile, and that one among them who is head of the rest in duties of this kind they call king. For they say that this is the proper name of the leaders, and it does not belong to ignorant persons. It is wonderful to see how men and women march together collectively, and always in obedience to the voice of the king. Nor do they regard him with loathing as we do, for they know that although he is greater than themselves, he is for all that their father and brother.
          ellauri223.html on line 84: Capt. Their food consists of flesh, butter, honey, cheese, garden herbs, and vegetables of various kinds. They were unwilling at first to slay animals, because it seemed cruel; but thinking afterward that is was also cruel to destroy herbs which have a share of sensitive feeling, they saw that they would perish from hunger unless they did an unjustifiable action for the sake of justifiable ones, and so now they all eat meat. Nevertheless, they do not kill willingly useful animals, such as oxen and horses. They observe the difference between useful and harmful foods, and for this they employ the science of medicine. They always change their food. First they eat flesh, then fish, then afterward they go back to flesh, and nature is never incommoded or weakened. The old people use the more digestible kind of food, and take three meals a day, eating only a little. But the general community eat twice, and the boys four times, that they may satisfy nature. The length of their lives is generally 100 years, but often they reach 200.
          ellauri223.html on line 90: And in other ways they labor to cure the epilepsy, with which they are often troubled. G.M. A sign this disease is of wonderful cleverness, for from it Hercules, Scrotus, Socrates, Callimachus, and Mahomet have suffered. This they cure by means of prayers to heaven, by strengthening the head, by taking acid, by planned gymnastics, and with fat cheese-bread sprinkled with the flour of wheaten corn. My, that is yummy, I tell you.
          ellauri223.html on line 92: They know also a secret for renovating sex life after about the seventieth year, and for ridding it of the wilted dick affliction, and this they do by a pleasing and indeed wonderful art, using young girls. But let's not go into that right now.
          ellauri223.html on line 96: Capt. This is the point I was just thinking of explaining. Everyone is judged by the first master of his trade, and thus all the head artificers are judges. They punish with exile, with flogging, with blame, with deprivation of the common table, with exclusion from the church and from the company of women. When there is a case in which great injury has been done, it is punished with death, and they repay an eye with an eye, a nose for a nose, a tooth for a tooth, a woman (or half a camel) for a woman, and so on, according to Hammurabi's law of retaliation.
          ellauri223.html on line 98: No one is killed or stoned unless by the hands of the people, the accuser and the witnesses beginning first. For they have no executioners and lictors, lest the State should sink into ruin. The choice of death is given to the rest of the people, who enclose the lifeless remains in little bags and burn them by the application of fire, while exhorters are present for the purpose of advising concerning a good death. Nevertheless, the whole nation laments and beseeches God that his anger may be appeased, being in grief that it should, as it were, have to cut off a rotten member of the State. Certain officers talk to and convince the accused man by means of arguments until he himself acquiesces in the sentence of death passed upon him, or else... But if a crime has been committed against the liberty of the republic, or against God, or against the supreme magistrates, there is immediate censure without pity. These motherfuckers are punished with death.
          ellauri223.html on line 100: Anyways, the inhabitants of the City of the Sun do not fear death, because they all believe that the soul is immortal, and that when it has left the body it is associated with other spirits, wicked or good, according to the merits of this present life.
          ellauri223.html on line 105: Each one takes the woman he loves most, and they dance for exercise with propriety and stateliness under the peristyles. The women wear their long hair all twisted together and collected into one knot on the crown of the head, but in rolling it they leave one curl. The men, however, have one curl only and the rest of their hair around the head is shaven off. Further, they wear a slight covering, and above this a round hat a little larger than the size of their head. In the fields they use caps, but at home each one wears a biretta, white, red, or another color according to his trade or occupation. Moreover, the magistrates use grander and more imposing-looking coverings for the head. Vizi että apinat rakastavat hattuja!
          ellauri223.html on line 122: The absence of good (Latin: privatio boni), also known as the privation theory of evil, is a theological and philosophical doctrine that evil, unlike good, is insubstantial, so that thinking of it as an entity is misleading. Instead, evil is rather the absence, or lack (“privation”), of good. This also means that everything that exists is good, insofar as it exists; and is also sometimes stated as that evil ought to be regarded as nothing, or as something non-existent.
          ellauri223.html on line 124: It is often associated with a version of the problem of evil: if some things in the world were to be admitted to be evil, this could be taken to reflect badly on the creator of the world, who would then be difficult to admit to be completely good. The merit of the doctrine in serving as a response to this version of the problem of evil is disputed.
          ellauri223.html on line 126: The doctrine is sometimes said to be rooted in Plato. While Plato never directly stated the doctrine, it was developed, based on his remarks on evil, by the Neoplatonist philosopher Plotinus, chiefly in the eighth tractate of his First Ennead.
          ellauri223.html on line 127: Neoplatonism was influential on St. Augustine of Hippo, with whom the doctrine is most associated. Augustine, in his Enchiridion, wrote:
          ellauri223.html on line 131: Also, in his City of God, he wrote:
          ellauri223.html on line 135: Through Augustine, this doctrine influenced much of Catholic thought on the subject of evil. For instance, Boethius famously proved, in Book III of his Consolation of Philosophy, that “evil is nothing”.The theologian Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite also states that all being is good, in Chapter 4 of his work The Divine Names. Thomas Aquinas concluded, in article 1 of question 5 of the First Part of his Summa Theologiae, that “goodness and being are really the same, and differ only in idea”.
          ellauri223.html on line 153: New Atlantis is an incomplete utopian novel by Sir Francis Bacon, published posthumously in 1626. It appeared unheralded and tucked into the back of a longer work of natural history, Sylva sylvarum (forest of materials). In New Atlantis, Bacon portrayed a vision of the future of human discovery and knowledge, expressing his aspirations and ideals for humankind. The novel depicts the creation of a utopian land where "generosity and enlightenment, dignity and splendour, piety and public spirit" are the commonly held qualities of the inhabitants of the mythical Bensalem. The plan and organisation of his ideal college, Salomon's House (or Shlomo's House), envisioned the modern research university in both applied and pure sciences.
          ellauri223.html on line 157: The novel depicts a mythical island, Bensalem, which is discovered by the crew of a European ship after they are lost in the Pacific Ocean somewhere west of Peru. The minimal plot serves the gradual unfolding of the island, its customs, but most importantly, its state-sponsored scientific institution, Salomon's House, "which house or college ... is the very eye of this kingdom."
          ellauri223.html on line 159: Many aspects of the society and history of the island are described, such as the Christian religion – which is reported to have been born there as a copy of the Bible and a letter from the Apostle Saint Bartholomew arrived there miraculously, a few years after the Ascension of Jesus; a cultural feast in honour of the family institution, called "the Feast of the Family"; a college of sages, the Salomon's House, "the very eye of the kingdom", to which order "God of heaven and earth had vouchsafed the grace to know the works of Creation, and the secrets of them", as well as "to discern between divine miracles, works of nature, works of art, and other impostures and illusions of all sorts"; and a series of instruments, process and methods of scientific research that were employed in the island by the Salomon's House.
          ellauri223.html on line 164: But hear me now, and I will tell you what I know. You shall understand that there is not under the heavens so chaste a nation as this of Bensalem; nor so free from all pollution or foulness. It is the virgin of the world. Ei menstruaatiota tytöillä eikä polluutiota teinipojilla.
          ellauri223.html on line 166: I remember I have read in one of your European books, of an holy hermit amongst you that desired to see the Spirit of Fornication; and there appeared to him a little foul ugly Aethiop. Fuckin niggah. But if he had desired to see the Spirit of Chastity of Bensalem, it would have appeared to him in the likeness of a fair (paleface) beautiful Cherubim. For there is nothing amongst mortal men more fair and admirable, than the chaste minds of this people. Know therefore, that with them there are no chicken stews, frozen or otherwise, no dissolute houses, no courtesans, nor anything of that kind.
          ellauri223.html on line 170: He portrayed a vision of the future of human discovery and knowledge. The plan and organisation of his ideal college, "Shlomo's House", envisioned the modern research university in both applied and pure science. The end of their foundation is thus described: "The end of our foundation is the knowledge of causes, and secret motions of things; and the enlarging of the bounds of human empire, to the effecting of all things possible". Vitun nilkki, hemmetin teknofriikki humanisti.
          ellauri223.html on line 182: Bacon stated that he had three goals: to uncover truth, to serve his country, and to serve his church. He sought to achieve these goals by seeking a prestigious post. Yet he failed to gain a position that he thought would lead him to success. He showed signs of sympathy to Puritanism, attending the sermons of the Puritan chaplain of Gray's Inn and accompanying his mother to the Temple Church to hear Walter Travers. In the Parliament of 1586, he openly urged execution for the Catholic Mary, Queen of Scots. He advocated for the union of England and Scotland, which made him a significant influence toward the consolidation of the United Kingdom; and he later would advocate for the integration of Ireland into the Union. Closer constitutional ties, he believed, would bring greater peace and strength to these countries. What a motherfucker.
          ellauri223.html on line 184: About this time, he again approached his powerful uncle for help; this move was followed by his rapid progress at the bar. Despite his assignations, he was unable to gain the status and notoriety of others. In a plan to revive his position he unsuccessfully courted the wealthy young widow Lady Elizabeth Hatton. His courtship failed after she broke off their relationship upon accepting marriage to Sir Edward Coke, a further spark of enmity between the men. Things went better with Coke than with a BLT.
          ellauri223.html on line 186: Vähän myöhemmin Pekoni otti osaa ex-suosijansa Essexin mestauxeen. "No defamer of any man". The succession of James I brought Bacon into greater favour. He was knighted in 1603. In another shrewd move, Bacon wrote his Apologies in defense of his proceedings in the case of Essex, as Essex had favoured James to succeed to the throne.
          ellauri223.html on line 188: When he was 36, Bacon courted Elizabeth Hatton, a young widow of 20. Reportedly, she broke off their relationship upon accepting marriage to a wealthier man, Bacon's rival, Sir Edward Coke. Years later, Bacon still wrote of his regret that the marriage to Hatton had not taken place.
          ellauri223.html on line 190: At the age of 45, Bacon married Alice Barnham, the 13-year-old daughter of a well-connected London alderman and MP. Bacon wrote two sonnets proclaiming his love for Alice. The first was written during his courtship and the second on his wedding day, 10 May 1606. When Bacon was appointed lord chancellor, "by special Warrant of the King", Lady Bacon was given precedence over all other Court ladies. Bacon's personal secretary and chaplain, William Rawley, wrote in his biography of Bacon that his marriage was one of "much conjugal love and respect", mentioning a robe of honour that he gave to Alice and which "she wore unto her dying day, being twenty years and more after his death".
          ellauri223.html on line 192: However, an increasing number of reports circulated about friction in the marriage, with speculation that this may have been due to Alice's making do with less money than she had once been accustomed to. It was said that she was strongly interested in fame and fortune, and when household finances dwindled, she complained bitterly. Bunten wrote in her Life of Alice Barnham that, upon their descent into debt, she went on trips to ask for financial favours and assistance from their circle of friends. Bacon disinherited her upon discovering her secret romantic relationship with Sir Frodo Underhill. He subsequently rewrote his will, which had previously been very generous—leaving her lands, goods, and income—and instead revoked it all.
          ellauri223.html on line 202: Reports of increasing friction in the marriage appeared, with speculation that some of this may have also been due to financial resources not being as abundantly available to Alice as she was accustomed to in the past. Alice was reportedly interested in fame and fortune, and when reserves of money were no longer available, there was constant complaining about where all the money was going.
          ellauri223.html on line 204: In 1625, Bacon became estranged from his wife, apparently believing her of adultery with Underhill. He rewrote his will, which had been quite generous to her, leaving her lands, goods, and income, to revoke it all:
          ellauri223.html on line 206: What so ever I have given, granted, conferred, or appointed to my wife in the former part of this my Will, I do now for just and great causes, utterly revoke, and make void, and leave her to her right only.
          ellauri223.html on line 208: He had no heirs and so his titles became extinct on his death in 1626 at the age of 65.
          ellauri223.html on line 212: The Viscountess St Albans, as she still preferred to be called, spent much of her marriage in Chancery proceedings, lawsuits over property. The first year was over her former husband's estate, trying to get what was left of Bacon's property, without his much greater debts. She was opposed in this by Sir John Constable, her brother in law, who had held some of the estate in trust. In 1628 she filed suits for property owned by her late father. In 1631, she and her husband both filed suit against Nicholas Bacon, of Gray's Inn, their former friend, who had married Sir John Underhill's niece, and gotten Underhill to sign an agreement for a large dowry and extensive property, including some property of Alice that Sir John did not have rights to, and could only inherit after her death. Their petition to court stated that Bacon had tricked Underhill "who was an almost totally deaf man, and by reason of the weakness of his eyes and the infirmity in his head, could not read writings of that nature without much pain," to sign a paper not knowing what it contained.
          ellauri223.html on line 214: In 1639, Viscountess St Albans and Sir Frodo Underhill became estranged, and began to live separately. In a later lawsuit, after her death, Underhill blamed Robert Tyrrell, or Turrell, their manservant, for this alienation of affections. In her will of 1642, she left half her property to Turrell, and other property to her nephew, Stephen Soames. She was buried in the old Parish Church of Eyworth, Bedfordshire, 9 July 1650, near her mother, and her sister, Lady Dorothy Constable.
          ellauri223.html on line 222: Several authors believe that, despite his marriage, Bacon was primarily attracted to men. Forker, for example, has explored the "historically documentable sexual preferences" of both Francis Bacon and King James I and concluded they were both oriented to "masculine love", a contemporary term that "seems to have been used exclusively to refer to the sexual preference of men for members of their own gender."
          ellauri223.html on line 224: The well-connected antiquary John Aubrey noted in his Brief Lives concerning Bacon, "He was a Pederast. His Ganimeds and Favourites tooke Bribes". ("Pederast" in Renaissance diction meant generally "homosexual" rather than specifically a lover of minors; "ganimed" derives from the mythical prince abducted by Zeus to be his cup-bearer and bed warmer.)
          ellauri223.html on line 226: The Jacobean antiquarian Sir Simonds D'Ewes (Bacon's fellow Member of Parliament) implied there had been a question of bringing him to trial for buggery, which his brother Anthony Bacon had also been charged with.
          ellauri223.html on line 228: In his Autobiography and Correspondence, in the diary entry for 3 May 1621, the date of Bacon's censure by Parliament, D'Ewes describes Bacon's love for his Welsh serving-men, in particular Godrick, a "very effeminate-faced youth" whom he calls "his catamite and bedfellow".
          ellauri223.html on line 230: This conclusion has been disputed by other faggots, who point to lack of consistent evidence, and consider the sources to be more open to interpretation. Publicly, at least, Bacon distanced himself from the idea of homosexuality. In his New Atlantis, he described his utopian island as being "the chastest nation under heaven", and "as for masculine love, they have no touch of it". Olipa 2-naamainen kaveri.
          ellauri226.html on line 51: Kuopan reunalla hoipertavan enää 3 huru-ukon itsenäisyyspäivän keikka, aina heidän suurin ja korkein profiili, pidetään keskiviikkona vetoisessa "Stadium of Fire" -tapahtumassa Brigham Youngin yliopiston kampuksella Provossa, Utahissa. Koska tämä osa maata on sekä republikaanien että mormonien linnoitus ja tämä on vaalivuosi, on syytä muistaa, että Beach Boysilla on useita ristiriitaisia perintöjä, joiden kanssa on otettava huomioon.
          ellauri226.html on line 57: Tarkemmin sanottuna saatat sanoa, että Beach Boysin pitkä historia riidoista, ystävyyssuhteista ja oikeusjutuista on esimerkki amerikkalaisen luonteen kahdesta puolesta. Brianin puolella meillä on tinkimätön sinisen valtion idealismi, ja Miken puolella meillä on punaisen valtion hyödyllisyys ja kaavasta kiinni pitäminen. Jos ostat Beach Boysin myytin, mikään analogia ei näytä liian korkealta. Puhumme Jefferson vastaan Hamilton, Buckley vastaan Vidal, Gore vastaan Bush, Occupy Wall Street vastaan Tea Partiers. Omien rinnastusten keksimisen pitäisi kestää vain muutama sekunti, joten pane hösselixi. Mites tämä: kusipäät vastaan paskiaiset, kyrpiöt vastaan mulkerot.
          ellauri226.html on line 66: In late 1964, as Brian Wilson's industry profile grew, he became acquainted with various individuals from around the Los Angeles music scene. He also took an increasing interest in recreational drugs (particularly marijuana, LSD, and Desbutal). According to his then-wife Marilyn, Wilson's new friends "had the gift of gab. All of a sudden Brian was in Hollywood—these people talk a language that was fascinating to him. Anybody that was different and talked cosmic or whatever he liked it." Wilson's closest friend in this period was Loren Schwartz, an aspiring talent agent that he met at a recording studio. Schwartz introduced Wilson to marijuana and LSD, as well as a wealth of literature commonly read by college students. During his first LSD trip, Wilson had what he considered to be "a very religious experience" and claimed to have seen God. God has subsequently personally confirmed this.
          ellauri226.html on line 68: In November 1965, early in the sessions for the Beach Boys' 11th studio LP Pet Sounds, Wilson began experimenting with the idea of recording an album focused on humor and laughter. He was intent on making Pet Sounds a complete departure from previous Beach Boys releases and did not wish to work with his usual lyricist, Mike Love, who was such a sourpuss.
          ellauri226.html on line 71: Love has the touring rights to the Beach Boys name — which has created controversy with his ex-bandmates in the past. Love is by far the right hand man of the men in flip-flops.
          ellauri226.html on line 74: Lead singer Love has been a longtime Trump supporter. He sang at one of the president’s inaugural balls in 2017, telling Uncut magazine afterward, “I don’t have anything negative to say about the president of the USA. I love his hair, it is very surfy." “I understand there are so many factions and fractious things going on. The chips will fall where they may,’’ Love said. “But Donald Trump has never been anything but kind to us. We have known him for many a year.’’ Aargh, for the love of Mike!
          ellauri226.html on line 83: Waters criticised the West for supplying Ukraine with weapons, blaming Washington in particular, and has also criticised NATO, accusing it of provoking Russia. Floydin This is not a drill kiertue Krakovassa peruttiin. Menköön Moskovaan laulamaan toivottivat tuohtuneet polakit.
          ellauri226.html on line 93: Sea and Sardinia is a travel book by the English writer D. H. Lawrence. It describes a brief excursion undertaken in January 1921 by Lawrence and his wife Frieda, a.k.a. Queen Bee, from Taormina in Sicily to the interior of Sardinia. They visited Cagliari, Mandas, Sorgono, and Nuoro. His visit to Nuoro was a kind of homage to Grazia Deledda but involved no personal encounter. Despite the brevity of his visit, Lawrence distils an essence of the island and its people that is still recognisable today.
          ellauri226.html on line 99: street of Nuoro. I am thinking that this is the home
          ellauri226.html on line 116: Dave is full of breathless switchbacks. You’re always veering giddily from fleeting exaltations (the joy of motion, the wildness of the landscape, the generosity of a peasant) to tedious exasperations (almost everything else). Luckily he had his wife along, the formidable Frieda (he refers to her as “the Q.B.,” for queen bee - Kuningatar! Eskin valtiatar on sekin vanhemmiten aika formidable), whose shrewd affirmations provided a foil for his grumbling discontents. Lawrence found the city “all bibs and bobs" . . . rather bare, rather stark, much of the city was levelled by Allied bombs, and it has not exactly been lovingly restored. “They pour themselves one over the other,” Lawrence sniffed of the Italians, “like so much melted butter over parsnips.” Lawrence ize preferoi tankeampia kelttijuurikkaita.
          ellauri226.html on line 135: My wife marched right in. All six guys filed in behind her, like a spaghetti western, many of which were filmed close by. Inside, the pallid bartender was polishing glasses. I slapped a euro on the bar and ordered two macchiatos. Then, in my grunting Italian American, I asked if this might be the same Risveglio from D.H. Lawrence’s day.
          ellauri226.html on line 137: For a moment everyone just looked hostile. Then they all started talking at once. The bartender said his grandmother owned the place then. Another guy said, No, that was a different owner.
          ellauri226.html on line 140: Nuovo, however, looked placid and tame. Nuovo was home to the Nobel laureate Grazia Deledda, whose novels Lawrence so admired, but her modest birthplace was closed. We walked around aimlessly, seeing the place through his eyes, but, of course, through Lawrence’s eyes “there’s nothing to see.” This is no longer quite true; there are two good museums in town. But, by now, it had taken on the sound of a mantra. “Sights are an irritating bore,” he wrote. “Happy is the town that has nothing to show.”
          ellauri226.html on line 190: Dotter Carin går till attack mot sin pappa författaren August-pristagaren Per Gunnar Evander. Carin Evander har fått nog av att hennes pappa, författaren Per Gunnar Evander, förvanskar historien om hennes familj och kränker minnet av hennes döda. Den Augustprisnominerade författaren Per Gunnar Evanders dotter anklagar.
          ellauri226.html on line 208: While local demographics and neighborhoods are undeniably subject to change, it is rare for a location to experience a major transformation in racial demographics in less than 50 years. Yet this is exactly what has happened in The Bronx between 1950 and 1980. As indicated by the 1950 the ethnic makeupof The Bronx was predominantly white. The census for 2000 indicates that whites (that is, what the U.S. Census labels “white, non-Hispanic”) now compose a distinct minority in The Bronx. The explanations for this remarkable change are complex. LOL actually they aren't, as we shall see.
          ellauri226.html on line 220: In 1970, the white pop. had decreased from 1.26 million to 1.08 million. The whites flew at approximately the same rate that new black residents were moving into the slum. In the 10 years between 1970 and 1980, however, this rate of
          ellauri226.html on line 225: While the reasons for this so-called “white flight” are varied, the one
          ellauri226.html on line 230: increase somewhet during this time period, rising by only approximately 14,000 new residents, many other ethnic groups appeared on The
          ellauri226.html on line 239: When asked to describe The Bronx during his childhood, Derrick recited a poem by writer Ogden Nash: “The Bronx? No, thonx!” When Nash
          ellauri226.html on line 248: Dr. Derrick talked about how his family often left the door
          ellauri226.html on line 258: this fact vividly because he had to get into buildings to deliver
          ellauri226.html on line 268: bus and travel. No it wasn’t four or five stops but it was four or five blocks to this Catholic grammar school I went to.
          ellauri226.html on line 281: Research has indicated that The Bronx began changing demographically right after World War II. The first influx of black and Hispanic residents was into the South Bronx after World War II, as former residents of Harlem were attracted to The Bronx because of its rent controlled apartments. Many of these blacks and Hispanics moved into neighborhoods following the subway and elevated trains transportation. Pre-cisely! This is just why Grankulla does not want subway nor high-rise apartment housing. Let the cleaners and station attendants sleep i Mattby i stället.
          ellauri226.html on line 289: This prompted one of the greatest migrations in U.S. history.
          ellauri226.html on line 296: neighborhood. Mr. Werner noticed this segregation where he lived, as the
          ellauri226.html on line 314: This woman, literally two seats afore me,
          ellauri226.html on line 316: Eleanor Kaplan, this girl, she was a Jewess I remember. She was
          ellauri226.html on line 320: While the failed shooting of Eleanor Kaplan was apparently not front page all over the news, it was enough for him and his family to move.
          ellauri226.html on line 327: Powell recalled, he and his neighborhood went from marijuana to heroin and
          ellauri226.html on line 352: Her boyfriend would drive her to her clinic in his car because he was afraid of walking alone in the community.
          ellauri226.html on line 379: his Fordham neighborhood. For Derrick, examples of how the neighborhood changed were a subway robbery and the burglary of her home. These examples of petty crime prompted him and his family to move to another section
          ellauri226.html on line 380: of The Bronx. Additionally troubling for Derrick and his family was
          ellauri226.html on line 381: what his sister endured at the local public high school. Even
          ellauri226.html on line 383: says that the environment of the school had completely changed and his
          ellauri226.html on line 385: enroll in a vocational school of petty crime and harassment, though experienced members of his family signaled that it was in fact a private school.
          ellauri226.html on line 387: The increase of frequency in the mugging of his mother near his home was not the same that he had grown up with during the 50s and 60s.
          ellauri226.html on line 395: 1970s. During this time, her mother was mugged twice while going to the neighborhood laundromat and there was a rash of petty crime in her parking
          ellauri226.html on line 400: 1970s and 80s, at least the wop cop said that heroin was good and easily found on street particularly throughout the South corners. As a police officer he was fighting against the dumping of the drug to lower the prices, and later, cocaine, because as the neighborhood drug dealer he was often a drug addict himself, selling drugs to support his own habit.
          ellauri226.html on line 421: The wiring in Dr. Derrick’s childhood was so weak at one point that he could not light a joint because his mom would blow a fuse.
          ellauri226.html on line 432: as early as 1970. Many of these nigrate individuals had called this area home for almost 20 years. Meanwhile white families began to migrate north within The Bronx, particularly Jewish, Irish, and Italian families.
          ellauri226.html on line 447: In this year it became public knowledge that the city funds had been depleted by nasty leeches and its capital was all gone. Their action had left the city penniless and unable to pay even the top brass. This led to the collapse of the city’s government,
          ellauri226.html on line 449: The city's finances were transferred to private chiselers.
          ellauri226.html on line 472: While Derrick did not attribute crime or violence to these Hispanic residents in the neighborhood, he was struck by the loud music that his
          ellauri226.html on line 473: neighbors played at all hours of the night, their loud merrymaking in the sack, and their tendency to throw garbage out of their windows. For Derrick, a graduate student at the time, the difference in lifestyles between him and his new neighbors became too much, and he eventually moved out of the apartment because of the behavior of his Hispanic neighbors.
          ellauri226.html on line 477: For Roby, who grew up being told to listen to this private police force and follow the development’s rules with the same piety as the city’s police and laws, the ease with which new residents disregarded and violated these rules was a shock but oddly liberating.
          ellauri226.html on line 483: left during this time period and cite the increase in crime and drug use as the
          ellauri226.html on line 489: work in New York City from the suburbs. This prompted many to move to
          ellauri226.html on line 515: leave the borough years before. This early movement of whites to suburbia, between the end of World War II and the 1960s, provided empty apartments
          ellauri236.html on line 48: Bolsonaro ran for his first term as president in 2018 with the conservative Liberal Party, campaigning as a political outsider and anti-corruption candidate, and gaining the moniker "Trump of the Tropics." A divisive figure, Bolsonaro has become known for his bombastic statements and conservative agenda, which is supported by important evangelical leaders in the country.
          ellauri236.html on line 50: During his reelection bid, Bolsonaro appealed to supporters' moral values and sense of national unity, and branded his left-wing adversary as "the communist threat." His campaign, which adopted the slogan "God, Nation, Family, and Liberty," promised an intensified version of his first term: tax cuts, policies that would support the agricultural industry, reduction of environmental rules, and a continuation of his Auxilio Brasil welfare payments to the poorest.
          ellauri236.html on line 52: But poverty has grown during his presidency, and his popularity levels took a hit over his handling of the pandemic, which he dismissed as the "little flu," before the virus killed more than 680,000 people in the country.
          ellauri236.html on line 54: Environmentalists also warned that the future of the rainforest could be at stake in this election, as Bolsonaro's government had become known for its support of ruthless exploitation of land in the Amazon, leading to record deforestation figures.
          ellauri236.html on line 56: Bolsonaro turned in a strong showing in the wealthier south of the country, winning Sao Paulo and his native Rio de Janeiro by margins of over 10%, but it was not enough to compensate for Lula’s massive turnout in the Northeast of Brazil, where the Workers Party has long enjoyed dominance. Indeed, Lula won numerous states by margins of 30%, 40% or even 50%, turning in particularly strong performances in the vote-rich states of Bahia, Ceara, and his native Pernambuco.
          ellauri236.html on line 58: Bolsonaro voted in Vila Militar in his home state of Rio de Janeiro, saying he had "the expectation of victory, for the good of Brazil…if it is God’s will, we will be victorious tonight."
          ellauri236.html on line 60: Lula's election tonight represents one of the greatest comeback stories in Latin American history. Lula was convicted and imprisoned on corruption and money laundering charges that were later overturned on a technicality by Brazil’s Supreme Court, clearing the way for him to run for an unprecedented third term.
          ellauri236.html on line 65: Advocates have expressed fears that some posts could lead to violence or to a broader questioning of the results. Adding to the worries is the new ownership of Twitter by billionaire Elon Musk, a free speech advocate. During his first day as Twitter’s new owner on Friday, Musk tweeted that he would pause all “major content decisions” and reinstatements of accounts until he convened a new content moderation council. The announcement effectively disbands aspects of Twitter’s tool kits for penalizing accounts — from those of presidents to foreign trolls — that break the company’s rules against hate speech, bullying and spreading misinformation around elections.
          ellauri236.html on line 79: Win or Lose, Bolsonaro Has Destroyed Trust in Brazil’s Elections. President Jair Bolsonaro has attacked Brazil’s electronic voting system. Now, ahead of Sunday’s elections, many of his supporters believe there will be fraud.
          ellauri236.html on line 85: Kátia de Lima, in green slime, attending a rally in support of President Jair Bolsonaro this month in Rio de Janeiro. Credit...Maria Magdalena Arrellaga for The New York Times By Jack Nicas.
          ellauri236.html on line 86: Jack Nicholson, the Brazil bureau chief, spoke to dozens of President Jair Bolsonaro’s supporters at events across the country for this article.
          ellauri236.html on line 89: That is because, they say, his defeat can only mean the vote was rigged.
          ellauri236.html on line 91: “There’s a lot of fraud,” said Kátia de Lima, 47, a store clerk at a rally for Mr. Bolsonaro this month. “It’s proven.”
          ellauri236.html on line 98: One man interviewed by The New York Times played a video he received on WhatsApp that said Mr. Bolsonaro had visited Russia this year to get President Vladimir V. Putin’s help in fighting the Brazilian left’s plans to steal Sunday’s election.
          ellauri236.html on line 102: “I look at the things I want to see, and I avoid looking at what they want to show me,” said José Luiz Chaves Fonseca, a turbine engineer for offshore oil platforms who was attending the rally this month north of Rio de Janeiro as a Bolsonaro impersonator. “If everyone dressed like this, they wouldn’t be tricked.”
          ellauri236.html on line 108: According to Brazil's Superior Electoral Court, Positivo Tecnologia, a Brazilian company, won the most recent bid to produce electronic voting machines for this year's election. Smartmatic and Dominion confirmed their equipment is not being used in Brazil. But the voting machine claims resurged this month, both in WhatsApp messages in Brazil about Smartmatic and in English-language posts on U.S. social media sites claiming, incorrectly, that Dominion or Smartmatic machines were used in Brazil.
          ellauri236.html on line 110: Critics have charged that Bolsonaro would not accept the electoral results in case of a loss, but on Friday he sang a different tune: "Whoever has the most votes takes it. This is democracy." But if it's not me, we must stop the steal.
          ellauri236.html on line 132: James Hadley Chase (24 December 1906 – 6 February 1985) was an English writer. While his birth name was René Lodge Brabazon Raymond, he was well known by his various pseudonyms, including James Hadley Chase, James L. Docherty, Raymond Marshall, R. Raymond, and Ambrose Grant. He was one of the best known thriller writers of all time. The canon of Chase, comprising 90 titles, earned him a reputation as the king of thriller writers in Europe. He was also one of the internationally best-selling authors, and to date 50 of his books have been made into films.
          ellauri236.html on line 134: Tästä kaikesta voi päätellä että Chasen kirjat ovat pulppia. He was the son of Colonel Francis Raymond of the colonial Indian Army, a veterinary surgeon. His father intended his son to have a scientific career and had him educated at King's School, Rochester, Kent.
          ellauri236.html on line 150: Eli siis James Hadley Chase (24 December 1906 – 6 February 1985) was an English writer. While his birth name was René Lodge Brabazon Raymond, he was well known by his various pseudonyms, including James Hadley Chase, James L. Docherty, Raymond Marshall, R. Raymond, and Ambrose Grant. He was one of the best known thriller writers of all time. The canon of Chase, comprising 90 titles, earned him a reputation as the king of thriller writers in Europe. He was also one of the internationally best-selling authors, and to date 50 of his books have been made into films
          ellauri236.html on line 156: Chasen valtti on ezen juonissa ei oli MITÄÄN muuta kuin näitä matelåijan aivoituxia. EFK puhtaaxiviljeltyinä rehottaa joka sivulla. E=säilykelihatycoonin 6 miljoonaa, F=Carol puolialasti (hänen vartalonsa on kuin Coney Islandin vuoristorata), K=Sullivanin iljexet. Silmittömän Royn ääni oli kauempana ihmisäänestä kuin papukaijan mölähdys. Sullivanit polttivat sen päreixi. This parrot is no more. It has joined its ancestors. It is an ex parrot.
          ellauri236.html on line 158:
          ellauri236.html on line 165: After Chase left home at the age of 18, he worked in sales, primarily focusing on books and literature. He sold children's encyclopaedias, while also working in a bookshop. He also served as an executive for a book wholesaler, before turning to a writing career that produced more than 90 mystery books. His interests included photography, of a professional standard, reading, and listening to classical music and opera. As a form of relaxation between novels, he put together highly complicated and sophisticated Meccano models.
          ellauri236.html on line 169: Prohibition and the ensuing Great Depression in the US (1929–39) had given rise to the Chicago gangster culture prior to World War II. This, combined with Chase's book trade experience, convinced him that there was a big demand for gangster stories. After reading James M. Cain's novel The Postman Always Rings Twice (1934), and having read about the American gangster Ma Barker and her sons, and with the help of maps and a slang dictionary, he wrote No Orchids for Miss Blandish in his spare time, he claimed over a period of six weekends, though his papers suggest it took longer. The book achieved remarkable notoriety and became one of the best-selling books of the decade. It was the subject of the 1944 essay "Raffles and Miss Blandish" by George Orwell (alla). Chase and Robert Nesbitt adapted it to a stage play of the same name which ran in London's West End to good reviews. The 1948 film adaptation was widely denounced as salacious due to the film's portrayal of violence and sexuality. Robert Aldrich did a remake, The Grissom Gang, in 1971.
          ellauri236.html on line 177: Muziinä se oli oikeassa että fascistiaikoina kuten juuri nyt peukutetaan poliisisarjoja jossa pollarit on rattaita all-powerful valvontaorganisaatiossa. Epäiltyjen elimiä pöyhitään lupaa kysymättä kumikauloina ja naamat liimataan whiteboardille. Valvontakameroista tarkistetaan kuka teki mitä kellekkin ja mihin reikään. Whiteboardille tulee miljoonia nuolia. Siiramaiset karhuryhmät ryntää karjahdellen sisään ovista. "This is a murder investigation" on joku stiiknafuulia, licence to kill jolla pollari pääsee läpi luokkarajoista maxamaan potut pottuina tunkiokukoille. Verenhimon lisäxi luokkaviha on poliisisarjojen tärkein käyttöaine.
          ellauri236.html on line 180:

          Orwell whacks his fellow expatriate Hadley Chase


          ellauri236.html on line 182: So much for Raffles. Now for a header into the cesspool. No Orchids for Miss Blandish, by James Hadley Chase, was published in 1939, but seems to have enjoyed its greatest popularity in 1940, during the Battle of Britain and the blitz. In its main outlines its story is this:
          ellauri236.html on line 184: Miss Blandish, the daughter of a millionaire, is kidnapped by some gangsters who are almost immediately surprised and killed off by a larger and better organized gang. They hold her to ransom and extract half a million dollars from her father. Their original plan had been to kill her as soon as the ransom-money was received, but a chance keeps her alive. One of the gang is a young man named Slim, whose sole pleasure in life consists in driving knives (well, his prick as well, got to give that much to him) into other people's bellies. In childhood he has graduated by cutting up living animals with a pair of rusty scissors. Slim is sexually impotent, but takes a kind of fancy to Miss Blandish. Slim's mother, who is the real brains of the gang, sees in this the chance of curing Slim's impotence, and decides to keep Miss Blandish in custody till Slim shall have succeeded in raping her. After many efforts and much persuasion, including the flogging of Miss Blandish with a length of rubber hosepipe, the rape is achieved. (Ei se ihan näin mennyt, George!) Meanwhile Miss Blandish's father has hired a private detective, and by means of bribery and torture the detective and the police manage to round up and exterminate the whole gang. Slim escapes with Miss Blandish and is killed after a final juicy rape, and the detective prepares to restore Miss Blandish to her pristine shape. By this time, however, she has developed such a taste for Slim's caresses(3) that she feels unable to live without him, and she jumps, out of the window of a sky-scraper. Footnote 1945. Another reading of the final episode is possible. It may mean merely that Miss Blandish is pregnant, i.e. she is damaged goods. Maybe she is sad that the baby's dad is dead. But the "interpretation" I have given above seems more in keeping with the general brutality of the book.
          ellauri236.html on line 186: Several other points need noticing before one can grasp the full implications of this book. To begin with, its central story bears a very marked resemblance to William Faulkner's novel, Sanctuary. Therefore, it is not, as one might expect, the product of an illiterate hack, but a brilliant piece of plagiarism, with hardly a wasted word or a jarring note anywhere. Thirdly, the whole book, récit as well as dialogue, is written in the American language; the author, an Englishman who has (I believe) never been in the United States, seems to have made a complete mental transference to the American underworld. Fourthly, and what is worst (from the point of view of a serious writer like myself) the book sold, according to its publishers, no less than half a million copies. Actually 2.
          ellauri236.html on line 188: I have already outlined the plot, but the subject-matter is much more sordid and brutal than this suggests. The book contains eight full-dress murders, an unassessable number of casual killings and woundings, an exhumation (with a careful reminder of the stench), the flogging of Miss Blandish, the torture of another woman with red-hot cigarette-ends, a strip-tease act, a third-degree scene of unheard-of cruelty and much else of the same kind. It assumes great sexual sophistication in its readers (there is a scene, for instance, in which a gangster, presumably of masochistic tendency, has an orgasm in the moment of being knifed - I can relate to that!), and it takes for granted the most complete corruption and self-seeking as the norm of human behaviour. The detective, for instance, is almost as great a rogue as the gangsters, and actuated by nearly the same motives. Like them, he is in pursuit of ‘five hundred grand’. It is necessary to the machinery of the story that Mr. Blandish should be anxious to get his money back, but apart from this, such things as affection, friendship, good nature or even ordinary politeness simply do not enter. Nor, to any great extent does normal sexuality. Ultimately only one motive is at work throughout the whole story: the pursuit of power. (Well, there is also the pursuit of spaghetti and some twat.)
          ellauri236.html on line 190: It should be noticed that the book is not in the ordinary sense pornography. In this respect it is a flop. Unlike most books that deal in sexual sadism, it lays the emphasis on the cruelty and not on the pleasure. Slim, the ravisher of Miss Blandish, has ‘wet slobbering lips’: this is meant to be disgusting (tho I didn't find it so). But the scenes describing cruelty to women are comparatively perfunctory. The real high-spots of the book are cruelties committed by men upon other men; above all, the third-degreeing of the gangster, Eddie Schultz, who is lashed into a chair and flogged on the windpipe with truncheons, his arms broken by fresh blows as he breaks loose. My conclusion: Chase is a closet homosexual (I should know)! He's an algolagniac, like Swinburne!
          ellauri236.html on line 192: In another of Mr. Chase's books, He Won't Need It Now, the hero, who is intended to be a sympathetic and perhaps even noble character, is described as stamping on somebody's face, and then, having crushed the man's mouth in, grinding his heel round and round in it. Even when physical incidents of this kind are not occurring, the mental atmosphere of these books is always the same. Their whole theme is the struggle for power and the triumph of the strong over the weak. The big gangsters wipe out the little ones as mercilessly as a pike gobbling up the little fish in a pond; the police kill off the criminals as cruelly as the angler kills the pike. If ultimately one sides with the police against the gangsters, it is merely because they are better organized and more powerful, because, in fact, the law is a bigger racket than crime. Might is right: vae victis. But think of it, what is new? All undying epic heroes are described as stamping on one anothers faces.
          ellauri236.html on line 194: As I have mentioned already, No Orchids enjoyed its greatest vogue in 1940, though it was successfully running as a play till some time later. It was, in fact, one of the things that helped to console people for the boredom of being bombed. Early in the war the New Yorker had a picture of a little man approaching a news-stall littered with paper with such headlines as ‘Great Tank Battles in Northern France’, ‘Big Naval Battle in the North Sea’, ‘Huge Air Battles over the Channel’, etc., etc. The little man is saying ‘Action Stories, please’. That little man with his little dick stood for all the drugged millions to whom the world of the gangster and the prize-ring is more ‘real’, more ‘tough’, than such things as crucifixions, wars, revolutions, earthquakes, famines, genocides, holocausts and pestilences. From the point of view of a reader of Action Stories, a description of the London blitz, or of the internal struggles of the European underground parties, would be ‘sissy stuff’. On the other hand, some puny gun-battle in Chicago, resulting in perhaps half a dozen deaths, would seem genuinely ‘tough’. This habit of mind is now extremely widespread. A soldier sprawls in a muddy trench, with the machine-gun bullets crackling a foot or two overhead, and whiles away his intolerable boredom by reading an American gangster story. And what is it that makes that story so exciting? Precisely the fact that people are shooting at each other with machine-guns! Neither the soldier nor anyone else sees anything curious in this. It is taken for granted that an imaginary bullet is more thrilling than a real one. (But note one difference: they get a whacking pile of money and loads of wet twat for it.)
          ellauri236.html on line 198: There exists in America an enormous literature of more or less the same stamp as No Orchids. Quite apart from books, there is the huge array of ‘pulp magazines’, graded so as to cater for different kinds of fantasy, but nearly all having much the same mental atmosphere. A few of them go in for straight pornography, but the great majority are quite plainly aimed at sadists and masochists. Sold at threepence a copy under the title of Yank Mags(4), these things used to enjoy considerable popularity in England, but when the supply dried up owing to the war, no satisfactory substitute was forthcoming. English imitations of the ‘pulp magazine’ do now exist, but they are poor things compared with the original. English crook films, again, never approach the American crook film in brutality. And yet the career of Mr. Chase shows how deep the American influence has already gone. Not only is he himself living a continuous fantasy-life in the Chicago underworld, but he can count on hundreds of thousands of readers who know what is meant by a ‘clipshop’ or the ‘hotsquat’, do not have to do mental arithmetic when confronted by ‘fifty grand’, and understand at sight a sentence like ‘Johnny was a rummy and only two jumps ahead of the nut-factory’. Evidently there are great numbers of English people who are partly americanized in language and, one ought to add, in moral outlook. For there was no popular protest against No Orchids. In the end it was withdrawn, but only retrospectively, when a later work, Miss Callaghan Comes to Grief, brought Mr. Chase's books to the attention of the authorities. Judging by casual conversations at the time, ordinary readers got a mild thrill out of the obscenities of No Orchids, but saw nothing undesirable in the book as a whole. Many people, incidentally, were under the impression that it was an American book reissued in England.
          ellauri236.html on line 200: The thing that the ordinary reader ought to have objected to — almost certainly would have objected to, a few decades earlier — was the equivocal attitude towards crime. It is implied throughout No Orchids that being a criminal is only reprehensible in the sense that it does not pay. Being a policeman pays better, but there is no moral difference, since the police use essentially criminal methods. In a book like He Won't Need It Now the distinction between crime and crime-prevention practically disappears. This is a new departure for English sensational fiction, in which till recently there has always been a sharp distinction between right and wrong and a general agreement that virtue must triumph in the last chapter. English books glorifying crime (modern crime, that is — pirates and highwaymen are different) are very rare. Even a book like Raffles, as I have pointed out, is governed by powerful taboos, and it is clearly understood that Raffles's crimes must be expiated sooner or later. In America, both in life and fiction, the tendency to tolerate crime, even to admire the criminal so long as he is success, is very much more marked. It is, indeed, ultimately this attitude that has made it possible for crime to flourish upon so huge a scale. Books have been written about Al Capone that are hardly different in tone from the books written about Henry Ford, Stalin, Lord Northcliffe and all the rest of the ‘log cabin to White House’ brigade. And switching back eighty years, one finds Mark Twain adopting much the same attitude towards the disgusting bandit Slade, hero of twenty-eight murders, and towards the Western desperadoes generally. They were successful, they ‘made good’, therefore he admired them.
          ellauri236.html on line 202: In a book like No Orchids one is not, as in the old-style crime story, simply escaping from dull reality into an imaginary world of action. One's escape is essentially into cruelty and sexual perversion. No Orchids is aimed at the power-instinct, which Raffles or the Sherlock Holmes stories are not. At the same time the English attitude towards crime is not so superior to the American as I may have seemed to imply. It too is mixed up with power-worship, and has become more noticeably so in the last twenty years. A writer who is worth examining is Edgar Wallace, especially in such typical books as The Orator and the Mr. J. G. Reeder stories. Wallace was one of the first crime-story writers to break away from the old tradition of the private detective and make his central figure a Scotland Yard official. Sherlock Holmes is an amateur, solving his problems without the help and even, in the earlier stories, against the opposition of the police. Moreover, like Lupin, he is essentially an intellectual, even a scientist. He reasons logically from observed fact, and his intellectuality is constantly contrasted with the routine methods of the police. Wallace objected strongly to this slur, as he considered it, on Scotland Yard, and in several newspaper articles he went out of his way to denounce Holmes by name. His own ideal was the detective-inspector who catches criminals not because he is intellectually brilliant but because he is part of an all-powerful organization. Hence the curious fact that in Wallace's most characteristic stories the ‘clue’ and the ‘deduction’ play no part. The criminal is always defeated by an incredible coincidence, or because in some unexplained manner the police know all about the crime beforehand. The tone of the stories makes it quite clear that Wallace's admiration for the police is pure bully-worship. A Scotland Yard detective is the most powerful kind of being that he can imagine, while the criminal figures in his mind as an outlaw against whom anything is permissible, like the condemned slaves in the Roman arena. His policemen behave much more brutally than British policemen do in real life — they hit people with out provocation, fire revolvers past their ears to terrify them and so on — and some of the stories exhibit a fearful intellectual sadism. (For instance, Wallace likes to arrange things so that the villain is hanged on the same day as the heroine is married.) But it is sadism after the English fashion: that is to say, it is unconscious, there is not overtly any sex in it, and it keeps within the bounds of the law. The British public tolerates a harsh criminal law and gets a kick out of monstrously unfair murder trials: but still that is better, on any account, than tolerating or admiring crime. If one must worship a bully, it is better that he should be a policeman than a gangster. Wallace is still governed to some extent by the concept of ‘not done’. In No Orchids anything is ‘done’ so long as it leads on to power. All the barriers are down, all the motives are out in the open. Chase is a worse symptom than Wallace, to the extent that all-in wrestling is worse than boxing, or Fascism is worse than capitalist democracy.
          ellauri236.html on line 204: In borrowing from William Faulkner's Sanctuary, Chase only took the plot; the mental atmosphere of the two books is not similar. Chase really derives from other sources, and this particular bit of borrowing is only symbolic. What it symbolizes is the vulgarization of ideas which is constantly happening, and which probably happens faster in an age of print. Chase has been described as ‘Faulkner for the masses’, but it would be more accurate to describe him as Carlyle for the masses. He is a popular writer — there are many such in America, but they are still rarities in England — who has caught up with what is now fashionable to call ‘realism’, meaning the doctrine that might is right. The growth of ‘realism’ has been the great feature of the intellectual history of our own age. Why this should be so is a complicated question. The interconnexion between sadism, masochism, success-worship, power-worship, nationalism, and totalitarianism is a huge subject whose edges have barely been scratched, and even to mention it is considered somewhat indelicate. To take merely the first example that comes to mind, I believe no one has ever pointed out the sadistic and masochistic element in Bernard Shaw's work, still less suggested that this probably has some connexion with Shaw's admiration for dictators. Fascism is often loosely equated with sadism, but nearly always by people who see nothing wrong in the most slavish worship of Stalin. The truth is, of course, that the countless English intellectuals who kiss the arse of Stalin are not different from the minority who give their allegiance to Hitler or Mussolini, nor from the efficiency experts who preached ‘punch’, ‘drive’, ‘personality’ and ‘learn to be a Tiger man’ in the nineteen-twenties, nor from that older generation of intellectuals, Carlyle, Creasey and the rest of them, who bowed down before German militarism. All of them are worshipping power and successful cruelty. It is important to notice that the cult of power tends to be mixed up with a love of cruelty and wickedness for their own sakes. A tyrant is all the more admired if he happens to be a bloodstained crook as well, and ‘the end justifies the means’ often becomes, in effect, ‘the means justify themselves provided they are dirty enough’. This idea colours the outlook of all sympathizers with totalitarianism, and accounts, for instance, for the positive delight with which many English intellectuals greeted the Nazi-Soviet pact. It was a step only doubtfully useful to the U.S.S.R., but it was entirely unmoral, and for that reason to be admired; the explanations of it, which were numerous and self-contradictory, could come afterwards.
          ellauri236.html on line 206: Until recently the characteristic adventure stories of the English-speaking peoples have been stories in which the hero fights against odds. This is true all the way from Robin Hood to Pop-eye the Sailor. Perhaps the basic myth of the Western world is Jack the Giant-killer, but to be brought up to date this should be renamed Jack the Dwarf-killer, and there already exists a considerable literature which teaches, either overtly or implicitly, that one should side with the big man against the little man. Most of what is now written about foreign policy is simply an embroidery on this theme, and for several decades such phrases as ‘Play the game’, ‘Don't hit a man when he's down’ and ‘It's not cricket’ have never failed to draw a snigger from anyone of intellectual pretensions. What is comparatively new is to find the accepted pattern, according to which (a) right is right and wrong is wrong, whoever wins, and (b) weakness must be respected, disappearing from popular literature as well. When I first read D. H. Lawrence's novels, at the age of about twenty, I was puzzled by the fact that there did not seem to be any classification of the characters into ‘good’ and ‘bad’. Lawrence seemed to sympathize with all of them about equally, and this was so unusual as to give me the feeling of having lost my bearings. Today no one would think of looking for heroes and villains in a serious novel, but in lowbrow fiction one still expects to find a sharp distinction between right and wrong and between legality and illegality. The common people, on the whole, are still living in the world of absolute good and evil from which the intellectuals have long since escaped. But the popularity of No Orchids and the American books and magazines to which it is akin shows how rapidly the doctrine of ‘realism’ is gaining ground.
          ellauri236.html on line 208: Several people, after reading No Orchids, have remarked to me, ‘It's pure Fascism’. This is a correct description, although the book has not the smallest connexion with politics and very little with social or economic problems. It has merely the same relation to Fascism as, say Trollope's novels have to nineteenth-century capitalism. It is a daydream appropriate to a totalitarian age. In his imagined world of gangsters Chase is presenting, as it were, a distilled version of the modern political scene, in which such things as mass bombing of civilians, the use of hostages, torture to obtain confessions, secret prisons, execution without trial, floggings with rubber truncheons, drownings in cesspools, systematic falsification of records and statistics, treachery, bribery, and quislingism are normal and morally neutral, even admirable when they are done in a large and bold way. The average man is not directly interested in politics, and when he reads, he wants the current struggles of the world to be translated into a simple story about individuals. He can take an interest in Slim and Fenner as he could not in the G.P.U. and the Gestapo. People worship power in the form in which they are able to understand it. A twelve-year-old boy worships Jack Dempsey. An adolescent in a Glasgow slum worships Al Capone. An aspiring pupil at a business college worships Lord Nuffield. A New Statesman reader worships Stalin. There is a difference in intellectual maturity, but none in moral outlook. Thirty years ago the heroes of popular fiction had nothing in common with Mr. Chase's gangsters and detectives, and the idols of the English liberal intelligentsia were also comparatively sympathetic figures. Between Holmes and Fenner on the one hand, and between Abraham Lincoln and Stalin on the other, there is a similar gulf.
          ellauri236.html on line 210: One ought not to infer too much from the success of Mr. Chase's books. It is possible that it is an isolated phenomenon, brought about by the mingled boredom and brutality of war. (LOL) But if such books should definitely acclimatize themselves in England (or Nigeria!), instead of being merely a half-understood import from America, there would be good grounds for dismay. In choosing Raffles as a background for No Orchids I deliberately chose a book which by the standards of its time was morally equivocal. Raffles, as I have pointed out, has no real moral code, no religion, certainly no social consciousness. All he has is a set of reflexes the nervous system, as it were, of a gentleman. Give him a sharp tap on this reflex or that (they are called ‘sport’, ‘pal’, ‘woman’, ‘king and country’ and so forth), and you get a predictable reaction. In Mr. Chase's books there are no gentlemen and no taboos. Emancipation is complete. Freud and Machiavelli have reached the outer suburbs. Comparing the schoolboy atmosphere of the one book with the cruelty and corruption of the other, one is driven to feel that snobbishness, like hypocrisy, is a check upon behaviour whose value from a social point of view has been underrated.
          ellauri236.html on line 356: Pahaa sekoilua, tyhmiä konnia, joita alkaa pian kuhista kuin skitareita madon kimpussa. Esim.
          ellauri236.html on line 374: Upon publication, Chase's pulp thriller became particularly popular with British soldiers, seamen and airmen during World War II. These servicemen enjoyed its risqué passages, which marked a new frontier of daringness in popular literature. Author and military historian Patrick Bishop has called No Orchids For Miss Blandish, "perhaps the most widely-read book of the war".
          ellauri236.html on line 376: In New York City, a local goon and gang leader named Riley learns that the wealthy socialist Miss Blandish will be wearing an expensive diamond necklace to her birthday celebration. Riley and his gang plan to steal the necklace and ransom it. The inept criminals manage to kidnap Miss Blandish and her boyfriend, but after the latter is accidentally killed they instead decide to hold Miss Blandish ransom, reasoning that her millionaire father will pay more to get his daughter back safely than the necklace is worth.
          ellauri236.html on line 378: The plan begins to fall apart when a rival mob, led by the sadistic and mentally unbalanced Slim Grisson (actually, by his Ma), finds out about Riley's plan and kidnaps Miss Blandish from the gang. Mr. Blandish pays the ransom to Slim (no no, to his Ma!), but his daughter is not returned. Slim becomes increasingly obsessed with Miss Blandish and decides to keep her hidden in a secret room inside one of his nightclubs, repeatedly raping her and lashing out at anybody who attempts to wrestle Miss Blandish from his charge.
          ellauri236.html on line 380: Meanwhile, the police are on the trail of the kidnappers, and Dave Fenner, an ex journalist and now a private investigator, is hired to rescue her and deal with the gangsters. Fenner and the police eventually work out where the young socialist is located and go to the club, where a gun battle ensues. Slim is killed and Miss Blandish is rescued, but unfortunately, after months of fornication and drugs at the hands of the gangsters, Miss Blandish cannot cope with life without Slim (and his Ma!) and kills herself. Damaged goods.
          ellauri236.html on line 384: In 1947, the sado-eroticism in Chase's book was parodied by Raymond Queneau in his pastiche novel, We Always Treat Women Too Well. In 1961, the novel was extensively rewritten and revised by the author because he thought the world of 1939 too distant for a new generation of readers (confusion can result if readers of the Orwell essay refer his quotations and references to the 1962 edition).
          ellauri236.html on line 398: While he waited, Eddie noticed a girl standing by a nearby bus stop. She immediately attracted his attention: every good-looking girl did. She was a tall, cool-looking blonde with a figure that made him come in his pants twice. She had a pert prettiness that appealed to Eddie. He studied her face for a brief moment. Her make-up was good. Her mouth was a trifle large, but Eddie didn’t mind that. He liked the sexy look she had and the sophisticated way she wore her yellow summery whore dress.
          ellauri236.html on line 399: He half expected his cock go stiff a 3rd time, but no go. "Oh, hell! Spaghetti again!” Eddie groaned.
          ellauri236.html on line 401: A woman was leaning far out of the window, looking down at the commotion going on in the street below. Eddie could only see her pyjamaed back and legs, and even under the pressure in his pants, he found himself thinking she had a nice shape.
          ellauri236.html on line 403: She was a kid, 18 at the most. She was horny as hell. After some minutes of frantic handiwork, Eddie found his cock getting hard. It got up and he sat on the end of the bed. “I’m getting a hard on,” he said, grinning. “You get off to sleep if you want to.” “I don’t want to sleep,” the girl said. “You scared the life out of me, but looking at what you got, I’m not so scared now.” He came over to the bed and smiled at the girl. “Thanks a lot, baby. You were swell. I wish I could swell s'm more as well." She half sat on it in the bed, but it wouldn't go in.
          ellauri236.html on line 410: Eddie started to throw on his clothes.
          ellauri236.html on line 413: “I’m going to talk to her,” Eddie said. “I’m not standing for Slim relieving his repressions on that girl. I got mine to relieve on her too. There’s a limit, and goddamn it, that would be the limit! Be nice now! Doucement!"
          ellauri236.html on line 418: Eddie put his wand on her shoulder and shook it gently. No go. Bugger it.
          ellauri236.html on line 423: Eddie looked down. Spaghetti again. No go. For the first time in his life he felt dirty and ashamed of himself.
          ellauri236.html on line 425: Ma’s eyes suddenly snapped with rage. Her face turned purple. “Slim wants her,” she said, lowering her voice and glaring at Eddie. “He’s going to have her. You keep out of it! That goes for the rest of you too!” Eddie felt horny for the girl, but he wasn’t going to risk his life for her.
          ellauri236.html on line 428: “I know women,” he said with a sneer. “They’d do anything to stuff their face. I feel a boner coming. Call Anna." (Anna is the big mouthed one.) “That you, Anna?” Pete asked while Eddie watched him. “This is Pete. Come here quick. Something’s come up important. I want you over here right away. No, I don’t promise it’s a blow job, but it might lead to one. You’ll come? Okay, I’m waiting for you,” and he hung up.
          ellauri236.html on line 431: heels coming down the passage. He put his hand on the pecker. Like a garden hose. Bugger it.
          ellauri236.html on line 434: “Hello, baby,” Eddie said. “Come on in. No need to keep your pants on. This is a friendly meeting, I just wanna fondle your bag. Pass it over.” She crossed her legs, showing him what she had between her knees before adjusting her skirt.
          ellauri236.html on line 442: Slim suddenly kicked a chair out of his way. His wiener jumped into his hand. Woppy and Doc hurriedly backed away from Ma, leaving her to face Slim alone. Eddie stiffened too as Slim began slowly to move towards her.
          ellauri236.html on line 449: Slim stood at the head of the stairs, listening. He grinned to himself. At last he had shown his power. He had scared them all. From now on, he was going to have his rightful place in the gang. Ma was going to take second place. He looked down the passage at Miss Blandish’s room. It was time he stopped rubbing it on her night after night. He must show her he wasn’t only master of his mother, but master of her too. Dammit, he would stick it right in!
          ellauri236.html on line 451: Miss Blandish watched him come across the room. She saw his new confidence and she guessed what it was to mean to her.
          ellauri236.html on line 460: Fenner was a massively built man of thirty-three. He was dark, with an attractively ugly face and a pugnacious jaw of a man who likes to get his own way and generally does. Fenner on ilmetty narsisti.
          ellauri236.html on line 465: “They’ll take all the furniture away tomorrow unless you pay the third installment. So what shall I have to sit on?” Fenner looked startled. “They’re not taking that away as well, are they?” Fenner is full of wisecracks, a funny guy. Paula is forever the joke of his butt.
          ellauri236.html on line 470: Now this is romantic, don't we know. EAT! and FUCK! eternally at war. Good genes against food and shelter, and the good genes win. Sama juttu myös modernissa Foggissa. Vaikka, huomasitte kai, sammakkomaan lakukeppiä ei päästetty kättelemään punatukan äveriästä isäpappaa. Tämä vaivaannuttava episodi sivuutettiin taidolla. Tollanen kolmikko ei pysy koossa kuin jossain liberaalissa ajatuskuplassa tai 10 leguan syvyydessä valtameren pohjassa. Mixi muuten Passport ei ottanut päästä hattua tullessaan herrasmiesten klubille? Koska siltä puuttuu tapakasvatus!
          ellauri236.html on line 475: Fenner got to his feet. He was surprised Blandish wasn’t a bigger man. Only slightly above middle height, the millionaire seemed puny beside Fenner’s muscular bulk. His eyes gave his face its arresting power and character. Fenner has arresting power on his bulk, and Paula has a caracteristic butt. They were hard, shrewd and alert eyes of a man who has fought his way to the top with no mercy asked nor given. Now this is proper monkey business! Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk in the flesh! Täähän on yhtä mahtavaa kuin Malamudin apinoiden saarella!
          ellauri236.html on line 477: Blandish took out a pigskin cigar case and carefully selected a cigar. “I had to give the Federal Agents every chance of finding these men before I started interfering." The trail is cold, but so is Mr. Blandish. He is not over excited about finding his daughter, but maybe Fenner can get back some of his million bucks. And the necklace. Put your heart where your money is.
          ellauri236.html on line 485: Captain Charles Brennan, City Police, a fat, red-faced man with blue hard eyes and sandy-colored hair, greying at the temples, reached across his desk to shake dicks with Fenner. Why do these policemen always have the same look and feel? I guess its natural selection. Chase has an unerring touch of the hackneyed and obvious.
          ellauri236.html on line 489: Fenner frowned, then he snapped his fingers.
          ellauri236.html on line 492: What did this Borg girl do for a living when she was going around with Riley?” he asked.
          ellauri236.html on line 495: During the years Fenner had been a newspaperman, he had systematically collected every scrap of information concerning the activities of the big and little gangsters in town, just like his journalist colleague Heinie. Except Heinie is dead by now.
          ellauri236.html on line 500: Fenner put his arm around her coaxingly. “I’ll tell you where we’ll go, the Cosmos Club. We’ll combine business with pleasure.”
          ellauri236.html on line 514: Over the years, Chase developed a distinct, signature style in his writing that was fast-paced, with little explanations or details about the surroundings or weather or the unreliable characters. Characters in his novels and short stories would be more coherent than consistent who acted and reacted with unbreakable logic. Punchy sentences, short bursts of dialogue in authentic sounding dictionary slang with plenty of action were the characteristics of his writing.
          ellauri236.html on line 516: Chase was subject to several court cases during his career. In 1942, his novel Miss Callaghan Comes to Grief (1941), a lurid account of the white slave trade, was banned by the British authorities after the author and his publisher Jarrold were found guilty of an obscene book. Each was fined a hefty £100. Later, the Anglo-American crime author Raymond Chandler proved that Chase had lifted whole sections of his work in Blonde's Requiem (published 1945) forcing Chase to issue an apology in The Bestseller.
          ellauri236.html on line 520: Chase's novels were so thick that the reader was compelled to turn the pages in a non-stop effort to reach the end of the book. The final page often produced a totally unexpected plot twist. (Ei kuitenkaan tossa lähtöjuhlissa, kurkistin.) His early books contained some violence that matched the era in which they were written. Unfortunately, sex was never explicit and, though often hinted at, seldom happened. That would invariably leave even his most die-hard fans disappointed. This may be why his books failed to take hold in the American market.
          ellauri236.html on line 522: In many of his novels, treacherous women play a significant role. The protagonist falls in love with one and is prepared to kill someone at her behest. Only when he is killed, does he realise that the woman was manipulating him for her own ends. He never got it into her backend well and good, despite all the promises.
          ellauri236.html on line 526: Olin hiljattain Washingtonissa Kansainvälisen valuuttarahaston IMF:n kokouksessa, sanoi tohtori Luova Tuho. Taloushistorioitsija Niella Ferguson sanoi siellä pitämässään puheessa, että olisimme onnekkaita, jos saisimme vain 1970-luvun kaltaisen talouskriisin emmekä sotaa kuten 1940-luvulla. Kansalliset turvallisuusneuvonantajat olivat huolissaan Naton sekaantumisesta Venäjän ja Ukrainan väliseen sotaan sekä Iranin ja Israelin törmäyskurssista. Ja juuri tänä aamuna luin, että Joe Bidenin hallinto odottaa Kiinan hyökkäävän Taiwaniin ennemmin tai myöhemmin. Rehellisesti sanottuna: kolmas maailmansota on tosiasiassa jo alkanut, varmasti ainakin Ukrainassa ja kyberavaruudessa”, hän sanoo. Jo on siinä aivan vitun oikeassa.
          ellauri236.html on line 537: Tää oli siis jonkun M. Cainin kovaxi keitetty 30-luvulta josta pidettiin 80-luvulla uusi meteli koska siitä tehtiin uusi filmatisaatio pääosissa epämiellyttävä Jack Nicholson ja hevoshampainen nainen nimeltä Jessica Lange. En ole nähnyt rainoista kumpaakaan, saati lukenut alkuteosta. Juoni lyhyesti: The sensuous wife of a lunch wagon proprietor and a rootless drifter begin a sordidly steamy affair and conspire to murder her Greek husband (i.e. the said lunch wagon proprietor). This remake of the 1946 movie of the same name accounts an affair between a seedy drifter and a seductive wife of a roadside café owner. This begins a chain of events that culminates in murder. EFK ihan pikku pussissa.
          ellauri238.html on line 40: Täähän oli kissanpojan Psapfa-coveri? Jep: Catullus 51 is a poem by Roman love poet Gaius Valerius Catullus (c. 84 – c. 54 BC). It is an adaptation of one of Sappho's fragmentary lyric poems, Sappho 31. Catullus replaces Sappho's beloved with his own beloved Lesbia. Unlike the majority of Catullus' poems, the meter of this poem is the sapphic meter. This meter is more musical, seeing as Sappho mainly sang her poetry.
          ellauri238.html on line 140: Tähän se ei loppunut. Karuselli vain kiihtyi ja sekasortoinen epätodellisuus siirtyi Turkuun. Nyt Pentillä oli ladattu ase, Leenan isän sotamuisto-revolveri, kun he lähtivät Turkuun, psykiatri Armo Hormian järjestämään runoseminaariin bussilla, joka vei sinne kirjallista väkeä Helsingistä. Maila oli mukana tällä runoseminaarimatkalla, ja hän soitti minulle kauhistuneena Turusta. Hän sanoi tulevansa ensimmäisellä junalla takaisin ja minun pitäisi valmistautua heti lähtemään.
          ellauri238.html on line 173: - Mihis marsalkka, kysyy kilpikonna.

          ellauri238.html on line 192: Pari päivää seminaarin jälkeen Hormia oli pannut Leenan ja Penan poliisilta turvaan Kupittaan hourulaan, Pentin suljetulle osastolle. Pentti oli ammuskellut Seurahuoneella Leenan kotoa pihistämällä aseella. Pentti ei syönyt lääkkeitään, koska niistä tuli tokkuraan (LOL, entä viinasta?), vaan jakeli niitä muille potilaille. Hän muisti potilaan, joka paskansi hihitellen Penan huoneen nurkkaan, osoitteli läjää sormellaan ja hipsi hihitellen ulos. Kyllä minä ymmärsin, että se oli kommentti mun tuotannosta, Pentti veisteli. Pentti oli leuhka ja Marjukka koppava. Pentillä oli lähes olematon perse. Kai sixi että se oli perse koko mies.
          ellauri238.html on line 203: Tuula Saarikoski (o.s. Unkari) 1958–1964, lapset Helena s. 1958, Juri Saarikoski s. 1961. Oli elänyt Penan kanssa yhteisen nuoruuden samoissa seurakuntanuorissa Helsingissä. Olikohan se Johis? Tuula oli intelligentti ja erikoinen ja Pena oli ihaillut ja rakastanut häntä lapsesta asti. Juossut perässä peläten, ettei kelpaa. Juoxijoiden suunta ja järjestys vaihtui jatkossa.
          ellauri238.html on line 319:
          Name This Actor, Who Is Famous For His Role In "The Big Bang Theory"

          ellauri238.html on line 326: renessanssin ja uuden ajan historianelävöittäjät
          ellauri238.html on line 469: Else ja Ingrid on niikö vastakohtia, toisen flengasi nazit pihalle ja toisen kommarit. Saxan parhaita (ainakin jonkun mielestä) kumpikin, vaikka jutkuja. Ei siinä mitään, kauniit nimet, kivoja runoja. Vassarissa junge Kritiker*innen vääntää Kirschistä hampaat irvessä länsipropagandan asetta. Sarah ei viihtynyt harppisakuissa, muttei liioin Länsi-Saxassa. Ehti kuitenkin nähdä Saksojen yhdistymisen, jos se nyt oli parannus.
          ellauri238.html on line 646: Ukrainalaisten laskun mukaan venäläisiä nuorukaisia on kuollut länsirintamalla jo 70K. Luku on tietysti propagandan paisuttama, mutta silti vittu. Samaa voisivat kokeilla kiinalaisetkin, joille poikien suosiminen on tuottanut aivan sikamaisen ylituotannon. Mitäpä jos otettaisiin takaisin Formosan saari jonka länkkärit niin törkeästi omivat? Siellä olisi niitä puolijohteita. Hyvin syötetyt kiinalaiset pojat ovat jo aika isoja, kazo vaikka kuvia jossa Kiinan keisari on päätä pitempi kuin länkkärien skruippanat. Paizi Trump ja sen poika, jotka antaa viirusilmille hyvän vastuxen. Let me sit on it. No let me sit on it. Lets both sit on it. This I gotta see! Hoblan mukaan ruozalaiset säästää sähköä vetämällä ulos sladdeja. Va ba? Förlåt men jag fattar inte poängen. Sladdit vaan paleltuvat talvikeleillä. Tanskandoggi sanoo mäyräkoiralle umpihangessa: Voi vinde tassut paleltuvat. "Kuono umpeen, mulla on ihan omat ongelmat", mäyräkoira ärähtää.
          ellauri238.html on line 650: Born in Leningrad, Soviet Union (USSR), Korchnoi defected to the Netherlands in 1976, and resided in Switzerland from 1978, becoming a Swiss citizen. Korchnoi played four matches, three of which were official, against GM Anatoly Karpov. In 1974, Korchnoi lost the Candidates Tournament final to Karpov. Karpov was declared World Champion in 1975 when GM Bobby Fischer declined to defend his title. Korchnoi then won two consecutive Candidates cycles to qualify for World Chess Championship matches with Karpov in 1978 and 1981 but lost both.
          ellauri238.html on line 685: Muistan kyllä kuinka lähtiessäni viimeisestä tutkimuspaikastani Helsingin yliopiston palveluxeen ajattelin että alamäki jatkuu yhä jyrkempänä. Ja oikeassa olin. Verstaalle en koskaan kotiutunut, hist.kielit. osaston nahistelevat pikku satraapit vaan vituttivat. Ensimmäinen asemapaikka Kouvolassa oli pahempi kuin Ovidiuxen Konstanza. Räntäisillä kotimatkoilla Kouvolasta suunnittelin ajaa mannepirssin nokan alas Kymijoen sillalta tai pahki Söderkullan kallioleikkauxiin. Mutta seurasin Daota, en ajanut, annoin asioiden mennä omalla painollaan. Wu wei, heipparallaa hei, kuppa kullinnupin vei.
          ellauri238.html on line 730: "My cup runneth over" is a quotation from the Hebrew Bible (Psalms:23:5) and means "I have more than enough for my needs", though interpretations and usage vary. This phrase, in Hebrew כּוֹסִי רְוָיָה (kōsî rəwāyāh), is translated in the traditionally used King James Version as my cup runneth over. Newer translations of the phrase include "my cup overflows" and "my cup is completely full".
          ellauri238.html on line 732: "My cup runneth over!" is screamed as an expression of ecstasy by the fictional character William Bedford Diego in the 1999 video game System Shock 2, while in World of Warcraft, fictional character Blood Prince Valanar uses the phrase during the "Blood Prince Council" encounter. Also Pandaren Brewmaster from Dota 2 uses it. "Your cup runneth over!" is also an achievement or trophy in Devil May Cry 4. In an easter egg in Day of the Tentacle there is a Victorian photograph resembling the character Max from Sam & Max Hit the Road with the caption "The late Max Attucks, his petard runneth over." In the MOBA Smite, it is the name of a Match of the Day where teams begin the match at max level with 12,000 gold. The quote is also quoted by one of the symbiotic demons in Call of Duty: Vanguard´s zombies mode.
          ellauri238.html on line 759: Zbigniew Herbert (1924 Lviv, Puola– 1998 Varsova, Puola) oli ukrainalais-puolalainen runoilija ja moralisti. Hän käsittelee tuotannossaan ajankohdan ongelmia historian ja humanistisen kulttuuriperinteen näkökulmasta. Hän on kirjoittanut myös kuunnelmia ja esseitä. Jussi Rostin suomentama Herbertin runojen kokoelma Kyynelten teknologiasta (WSOY, 2005) on saanut 2006 Kimityskarhu-palkinnon. Pentti Saarikosken suomennosten alkukielestä ei ole varmuutta, sillä Herbert kirjoitti myös englanniksi.
          ellauri238.html on line 765: During the nazi occupation, he worked as a feeder of lice in the Rudolf Weigl Institute. From January until July 1952, he was a salaried blood donor. The loss of Lviw to the reds was an important theme in his later works. Herbert was attached to his new homeland tynkä-Poland, but at the same time was deeply disgusted by all effects (political, economical, cultural etc.) of the commies.
          ellauri238.html on line 769: 1993, already in a wheelchair, Herbert became a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. The last years of his life he spent in bed fighting with severe asthma. Herpertti olis saanut taistelustaan punaisia vastaan valkoisen kotkan pinssin postuumisti vasemmistopresidentiltä, mutta leski ei huolinut pinssiä ennenkuin presidentti oli vaihtunut oikeistolaisexi.
          ellauri238.html on line 776: we know from history historiasta tiedämme
          ellauri238.html on line 787: she leaves his living body hiän lähtee elävästä ruumiista
          ellauri238.html on line 792: beyond his bounds hänen rajojensa takana
          ellauri238.html on line 804: his base feelings of jealousy alhaiset mustasukkaisuuden tunteensa
          ellauri238.html on line 806: he thinks well of his soul hän arvostaa tota sieluaan
          ellauri238.html on line 815: Mr.Cogito accepts his destiny Mr. Ajattelen hyväxyy kohtalonsa
          ellauri238.html on line 818: he thinks of his soul with feeling hän ajattelee sieluaan tunteella
          ellauri238.html on line 826: He just watches out of the corner of his eye hän kazoo vaan silmännurkasta
          ellauri238.html on line 851: Beelzebub rakastaa taidetta. Hän ylpeilee, että hänen kuoronsa, runoilijansa ja maalarinsa ovat melkein taivaansinisiä. Sillä, jolla on parempaa taidetta, on parempi hallitus - se on selvää. Pian he voivat kilpailla kahden maailman festivaalilla. Ja sitten näemme, mitä Dantesta, Fra Angelicosta ja Bachista on jäljellä.
          ellauri238.html on line 860: Layle Silbert Yehuda Amichai (1924-2000) is recognized as one of Israel´s finest poets. His poems, written in Hebrew, have been translated into 40 languages (2 more than Herbert), and entire volumes of his work have been published in English, French, German, Swedish, Spanish, and Catalan. “Yehuda Amichai, it has been remarked with some justice,” according to translator Robert Alter, “is the most widely translated Hebrew poet since King David.” But boy, has he a long way to go to beat Dave.
          ellauri238.html on line 862: Born in Germany in 1924, Amichai and his family fled the country during Hitler’s rise to power when Amichai was 12 and settled in Palestine. Although Amichai’s native language was German, he read Hebrew fluently by the time he immigrated to Palestine. During the 1948 Arab-Israeli war he fought with the Israeli defense forces. The rigors and horrors of his service in this conflict, and in World War II, inform his poetry.
          ellauri238.html on line 874: And he remained with his great, empty worry. Ja se jäi ison, tyhjän huolensa kanssa kaksisteen.
          ellauri238.html on line 919: What are we doing, coming back here with this pain? Mitä me oikeen tehdään kun tullaan tänne kipuilemaan taas?
          ellauri238.html on line 923: reached this shore, pääsi näille rannoille,
          ellauri238.html on line 927: in this dark land with its tässä synkässä maassa jossa
          ellauri240.html on line 56: Mitä naisten tulisi tietää miehistä? No että niillä on kummassakin kivexessä herkkä kohta jossa sijaitsevat lisäkivexet. Että niiden erektio löpsähtää eri herkästi kun niiden bylsimistä arvostelee. Että ne ovat heikkoja, surkeita, aggressiivisia, izepäisiä ja raivostuttavia. Ja he jättävät vessan istuimen ylös, koska ne pissaavat seisaaltaan. Mixi ylipäänsä vaivautua? Kas siinä 64 kilotaalan kysymys.
          ellauri240.html on line 61: Another Jewish woman, Nora Barnacle burned most of the letters she received in 1909 from her lover who signed his name, “Jim.” But she didn’t destroy all of them. Indeed, they have survived all these years. In one of them, Jim, aka James Joyce, wrote to his muse whom he called his “little fuckbird,” “Fuck me, darling, in as many ways as your lust will suggest.” He went on and on: ”Fuck me dressed in your full outdoor costume with your hat and veil on, your face flushed with the cold and wind and rain and your boots muddy.” Sellaisia ne miehet on, koprofiilejä.
          ellauri240.html on line 84: A truly astonishing and original work of fiction indeed. It is a story of one man, a writer, who is born, who grows, who loves, who stops loving; who eats, sleeps, smokes, lies, boozes, cheats, regrets, has sex, has dreams, and lives. In short yet intimately detailed chapters, each covering a single aspect of his life from youth through old age, we get to know this person fully through the small yet telling incidents that make him who he is. He remembers the butt of a cigarette, the feel of his army uniform, the taste of a lover, the strange and unexpected touch of a college professor’s hand, and so many more small experiences that can never be shaken off more than a recalcitrant band-aid.
          ellauri240.html on line 101: Nancy realizes that the departed pedophile Krueger, now a vengeful ghost, is killing her and her friends out of revenge and to satiate his psychopathic needs. Realizing that Krueger is powered by his victim's fear, she calmly turns her back to him. Krueger evaporates when he attempts to lunge at her.
          ellauri240.html on line 107: Many Hmong refugees settled in the United States after the Vietnam War. Beginning in December 1975, the first Hmong refugees arrived in the U.S., mainly from refugee camps in Thailand; however, only 3,466 were granted asylum at that time under the Indochina Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1975. In May 1976, another 11,000 were allowed to enter the United States, and by 1978 some 30,000 Hmong people had immigrated. This first wave was made up predominantly of men directly associated with General Vang Pao's secret army. The Hmong allied with the French against the Communists during the whole Indochina War and with the Americans during the whole Vietnam War, hoping to resist communist Viêt Minh control. So here was the thanx for their efforts.
          ellauri240.html on line 109: During the Secret War, in the early 1960s through 1970s the word "Miao or Meo (meaning "cats", "barbarians", and even "Sons of Soiled Pants")" was used until it was changed by General Vang Pao and Dr. Yang Dao to "Hmong", with an added "H" in front of the word "Mong" just for fun. During that time, Dr. Yang Dao just like that, out of the hat, defined and cited the word 'Hmong' to mean "Free Men". This assertion was originally put forth by Yang Dao, himself a Hmong, who felt that framing the etymology of the word "Hmong" as meaning "free" would be beneficial to the self esteem of the Sons of Soil themselves.
          ellauri240.html on line 117: Vang Pao, mercenary soldier, born 8 December 1929; died 6 January 2011. Vang Pao, the Laotian general who marshalled a CIA mercenary army to fight a "secret war" against communist insurgents in the remote mountains of Laos in the 1960s, has died aged 81. Although Vang Pao's supporters portrayed him as a father figure uniting all his people, the Hmong (an ethnic minority in Laos), on the side of the US against the communist world, his critics regarded him as a charismatic but ruthless opium warlord, who made arrogant and misleading claims to speak on behalf of all Hmong. Far from uniting the Hmong, they say, he divided them. Some historians argue that he allowed his "secret army" to be used as cannon-fodder, played as pawns on a CIA geopolitical chessboard.
          ellauri240.html on line 119: Dazzled by the whirl of US airpower bringing 24-hour food and military supplies to his men in the remote mountains near the Plain of Jars, Vang Pao came to believe in the Chao Fa legend of an independent Hmong state.
          ellauri240.html on line 121: Reality soon dispersed that dreamworld. Vang Pao later admitted that his Hmong soldiers suffered appalling losses fighting around the Plain of Jars, in Xieng Khouang province. He put the figure at 17,000 dead by 1968. But his CIA controllers urged him to keep on fighting. US sources, including the historian Alfred McCoy, have noted that younger and younger fighters were forcibly enrolled. By 1968, 30% of the new recruits were only 14 years old.
          ellauri240.html on line 122: The Pathet Lao leadership, hiding in caves, survived one of history's most brutal aerial bombardments, and by 1975 had taken full control and established a communist government. The CIA arranged for flights to bring Vang Pao and his Hmong supporters to the US as refugees via airbases in Thailand. Thousands more beleaguered Vang Pao supporters fled across the Mekong and ended up in refugee camps.
          ellauri240.html on line 124: Vang Pao has been widely portrayed by his Hmong supporters and the US media as an American war hero and venerated leader of the Hmong people. The former CIA chief William Colby once called him "the biggest hero of the Vietnam war". He came very close to having a park in Madison City, Wisconsin, named after him in 2002. But McCoy objected to the honouring of a man who had ordered the summary executions of prisoners and soldiers who crossed him, and accused Vang Pao of war crimes and heroin-trafficking. Five years later, Vang Pao's name was removed from a new school in Madison after opponents said it should not bear the name of a man with such a blood-stained history.
          ellauri240.html on line 126: He was married to five women but was forced to divorce four of them when he arrived in the US. He is survived by his son, Chu Vang. It has been reported Vang Pao fathered more than 20, no, min 25 children.
          ellauri240.html on line 128: In 2007, he was arrested and charged with other Hmong leaders in federal court with conspiracy in a plot to kill communist officials in his native country. Federal prosecutors alleged the Lao liberation movement known as Neo Hom raised millions of dollars to recruit a mercenary force and conspired to obtain weapons.
          ellauri240.html on line 129: Even after his indictment, he appeared as the guest of honor at Hmong New Year celebrations in St. Paul and Fresno, where crowds of his supporters gathered to catch a glimpse of the highly decorated general as he arrived in a limousine.
          ellauri240.html on line 132: This story is part of the collection The Call to Serve: Stories of Sacrifice, War and the Way Home, which was funded by the Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation.
          ellauri240.html on line 205: Metalious's father deserted his wife and three daughters when Grace was 11 years old. At that time divorce was unusual in a French Canadian family, and Grace and her sisters felt stigmatized. In high school Grace met George Metalious, who was neither Catholic nor of French-Canadian background and, thus, highly unacceptable to her family. Nevertheless, they married in 1943. A few years later, with one child already, the Metalious's moved to Durham, New Hampshire, where George attended the University of New Hampshire. It was here that Metalious began writing seriously, neglecting both her house and, eventually, three children, despite the condemnation of her neighbors.
          ellauri240.html on line 207: After graduation George was offered a position as a principal at a school in Gilmanton, New Hampshire. By now the family had three children, all dependent upon his meager salary. It was while she was living in Gilmanton that Julian Messner, a New York publisher, agreed to publish Peyton Place. The book was a best seller by the fall of 1956, and Metalious became a wealthy woman overnight. Eventually, 20 million copies were sold in hardcover, along with another 12 million Dell paperbacks. Metalious became famous as the housewife who wrote a bestseller; she was referred to as "Pandora in Blue Jeans," the simple small-town woman who opened the box of sins.
          ellauri240.html on line 213: Despite its notoriety and the large amounts of money it earned her, the book led to the ruination of Grace Metalious. She purchased a house that she had long admired in Gilmanton, then had it extensively remodeled. Meanwhile, her husband's contract with the Gilmanton school was not renewed. Officially, he was not fired, but the rumor was that the dismissal was because of his wife's book. At any rate, it made good publicity for the book. George eventually got a new job in Massachusetts, but Grace refused to leave her house. Eventually the two divorced and Grace, who had begun drinking heavily, married a local disc jockey.
          ellauri240.html on line 217: After she died, George wrote his own book called The Girl from "Peyton Place." The book offers a husband's view of how Metalious was exploited after the publication of the book, but also of how she was responsible for bringing unhappiness to herself and to others. A whole series of other "Peyton Place" books were produced after Grace Metalious's death, with titles like The Evils of Peyton Place and Temptations of Peyton Place. None of these were a commercial success.
          ellauri240.html on line 237: Constancea häirizee että mustalais-Selena näyttää 13-vuotiaana naiselta. Jerry Lee Lewis-vainaja meni sen ikäisen serkuntytön kanssa naimisiin, vaikkei ero edellisen vaimon kanssa ollut vielä selvä. Siihen tyssäsi Jerryn tähdenlento. Tuli kananlento. Great balls of fire. Muhammedin lentoa ei moinen haitannut. Eikä Allisonin juutalaisen hellunkaan. Allen sexually assaulted his adopted daughter Dylan Farrow when she was seven - which he has vehemently denied. But who believes him? He took porn pics of the adolescent Korean girl while they still lived in Allison's home.
          ellauri240.html on line 278: Linguists have all discovered apparent confirmation of the theory that Middleton wrote much of the play. It contains numerous words, phrases, and punctuation choices that are characteristic of his work but rare in Shakespeare.
          ellauri240.html on line 286: Some Frank refers to Timon of Athens as "a poor relation of the major tragedies." This is the majority view, but the play has many scholarly defenders as well. Nevertheless, and perhaps unsurprisingly due to its subject matter, it has not proven to be among Shakespeare's popular works.
          ellauri240.html on line 290: Herman Melville considered Timon to be among the most profound of Shakespeare's plays. Melville used the term "Timonism" about an artist's contemptuous rejection of both his audience and mankind in general.
          ellauri240.html on line 299: Tähän albumiin sopisi hyvin lukaista loppuun kesken jäänyt Adichen kehitysromaani Kotiinpalaajat, koska siitä löytyy takuuvarmasti misogyniaa tykötarpeixi. Eli otetaan esiin pointteja Ifemelun seikkailusta ja zekataan pikku-Aunen kirjasta mitä ne todistavat miehistä.
          ellauri240.html on line 303: Viidakkopartio on Mustanaamio-sarjakuvassa esiintyvä järjestö, jonka tarkoituksena on ylläpitää Bengalin viidakoiden ja kaupunkien järjestystä. Sen nykyinen johtaja on eversti Worubu, mutta Mustanaamio on järjestön salainen ylipäällikkö. Järjestön tunnus on sama kuin Mustanaamion hyvä merkki: neljä miekkaa, kuin P-kirjainta, ristikkäin. Tunnuslause "Stamus contra malum" tarkoittaa suomeksi "Vastustamme pahuutta". Mustanaamion viidakossa on paljon köyhiä, joilla ruoka on usein vähissä ja terveydenhoidosta vastaavat vain lukuisat poppamiehet loitsuineen. Mustanaamio auttaakin viidakon köyhiä vain silloin, kun heitä uhkaa jokin viidakon ulkopuolinen vaara. Valtavaa omaisuuttaan hän ei käytä viidakon köyhien auttamiseen ja heidän olosuhteidensa parantamiseen. Neekerinaisten ylenemismahdollisuuxista se ei voisi vähempää välittää.
          ellauri240.html on line 363: Oletteko ajatelleet miehiä??? Pitää jakaa kaksi kirjaa. Toinen miehistä. Tasa-arvovaltuutetulla olis hommia. Onks tää taas näitä juttuja kun Suomalaisten pitää vaan sopeutua kaikenlaisiin asioihin omassa maassaan? Paljonkos nää kirjat kustantaa??? Kuka uskaltaa kertoo? Äänimies Esko
          ellauri240.html on line 427: Minähän olen mies. Yleisellä tasolla feministit eivät pidä miehisistä miehistä, vaan haluavat muuttaa ne hiirulaisiksi ja nössöiksi. Se ei vaan onnistu kohdallani. Ja eihän tässä ota kukaan kantaa kirjan sisällöstä, vaan toteavat ettei feminismi enää ole sama kuin alkuaikoina, koska äärifeministit ovat kovaäänisesti lähteneet miesvihalinjalle. Sotaisimmat jopa mediassa todenneet olevansa lesboja ja ettei miehiä tarvita edes sänkypuuhiin. Jos ihmettelee miten saadaan sitten lisää jälkikasvua jota maailma kipeästi kaipaa, vastaus on että adoptio kolmansista maista. Mutta sehän ei matemaattisesti päde, koska sen kersan on jo toinen pari tehnyt maailmaan. (👍 Hyvin sanottu: ?)
          ellauri240.html on line 455: No vittu sixi tietysti ettei äidistä jää epäilystä, kun taas isä voi olla ihan kuka tahansa! Jokainen kulkumies rotinkainen nimeltä Auf Widersehn on isäehdokas. Näyttää selvältä, että hallitsevien luokkien miehisesti järjestynyt yhteiskunta ymmärsi jo hyvin varhaisessa vaiheessa, että ilman tiukkaa valvontaa ja kaikkinaista nujertamista naiset eivät suostu alistumaan heitä ympäröiviin moraalisiin, yhteiskunnallisiin, laillisiin ja uskonnollisiin pakotteisiin eivätkä etenkään yksiavioisuuden mukanaan tuomiin vaatimuksiin. Naisten bylsintä piti sixi pitää ihan minimissä (paizi huzujen tietysti, joiden kakaroista ei kukaan välitä). Mies sen sijaan oli vapaa pitämään useampia vaimoja. Tällainen järjestelmä ei olisi voinut syntyä eikä pysyä pystyssä tähän päivään saakka ilman monenlaisia julmia ja kekseliäitä keinoja, joilla naisen seksuaalisuutta valvottiin. Niillä rajoitettiin naisen sukupuolisuhteet vain aviomieheen.
          ellauri240.html on line 491: This podcast is brought to you by MeUndies. If I’m not going commando, then I’m wearing MeUndies. I’ve been testing out a pair for about 3 or 4 months now, and, as a result, I’ve thrown out my other underwear. They look good, feel good, have different hole options for men and women, and their materials are 2x softer than cotton, as evaluated using the Kawabata method. Not only does MeUndies offer underwear, but they also have incredible lounge pants. I wear them when I record the podcast, and when I’m lounging out and about grabbing coffee.
          ellauri240.html on line 494: Rainn Dietrich Wilson. (s. 20. tammikuuta 1966 Seattle, Washington), hän on yhdysvaltalainen näyttelijä. Hänet tunnetaan parhaiten roolistaan Dwight Schrutena televisiosarjan Konttori yhdysvaltalaisessa versiossa. Hän ei saanut tähtiosaa, eikä sivuosastakaan Emmyä. Hän tuli tähtien shakkiottelussa toisexi. Outside of acting, Wilson published an autobiography, The Bassoon King, in 2015, and co-founded the digital media company SoulPancake in 2008. In 2022, On November 10, 2022, Wilson changed his name on social media to Rainnfall Heat Wave Rising Sea Levels Wilson in an effort to raise awareness about climate change, though he did not legally change his name.
          ellauri240.html on line 496: Wilson and his family are members of the Baháʼí Faith. They have two pit bulls, Pilot and Diamond; two Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs, Snortington and Amy; a donkey named Chili Beans; and a zonkey named Derek. He uses his arts to impregnate adolescent girls in rural Haiti. Soulpancake.com (sold out to some media company in 2016) is "temporarily unavailable".
          ellauri241.html on line 45: In 1818 Hampstead, the fashionable Fanny Brawne (Abbie Cornish) is introduced to poet John Keats (Ben Whishaw) through the Dilke family. The Dilkes occupy one half of a double house, with Charles Brown (Paul Schneider) occupying the other half. Brown is Keats' friend, roommate, and associate in writing.
          ellauri241.html on line 47: Fanny's flirtatious personality contrasts with Keats' notably more aloof nature. She begins to pursue him after her siblings Samuel and Toots obtain his book of poetry, "Endymion". Her efforts to interact with the poet are fruitless until he witnesses her grief for the loss of his brother, Tom. Keats begins to open up to her advances while spending Christmas with the Brawne family. He begins giving her poetry lessons, and it becomes apparent that their attraction is mutual. Fanny is nevertheless troubled by his reluctance to pursue her, on which her mother (Kerry Fox) surmises, "Mr. Keats knows he cannot like you, he has no living and no income."
          ellauri241.html on line 49: It is only after Fanny receives a valentine from Brown that Keats passionately confronts them and asks if they are lovers. Brown sent the valentine in jest, but warns Keats that Fanny is a mere flirt playing a game. Fanny is hurt by Brown's accusations and Keats' lack of faith in her; she ends their lessons and leaves. The Dilkes move to Westminster in the spring, leaving the Brawne family their half of the house and six months rent. Fanny and Keats then resume their interaction and fall deeply (ca. 6 inches) in love. The relationship comes to an abrupt end when Brown departs with Keats for his summer holiday, where Keats may earn some money. Fanny is heartbroken, though she is comforted by Keats' love letters. When the men return in the autumn, Fanny's mother voices her concern that Fanny's attachment to the poet will hinder her from being courted. Fanny and Keats secretly become engaged.
          ellauri241.html on line 51: Keats contracts tuberculosis the following winter. He spends several weeks recovering until spring. His friends collect funds so that he may spend the following winter in Italy, where the climate is warmer. After Brown impregnates a maid and is unable to accompany him, Keats finds accommodation in London for the summer, and is later taken in by the Brawne family following an attack of his illness. When his book sells with moderate success, Fanny's mother gives him her blessing to marry Fanny once he returns from Italy. The night before he leaves, he and Fanny say their tearful goodbyes in privacy. Keats dies in Italy the following February of complications from his illness, as his brother Tom did. Bugger it.
          ellauri241.html on line 88: On this side of Jove's clouds, to escape the sight Joven pilvien tältä puolelta, välttääkseen
          ellauri241.html on line 89: Of his great summoner, and made retreat suuren kutsujansa näkyjä ja tehnyt vetäytymisen
          ellauri241.html on line 101: Burnt from his winged heels to either ear, poltti hänen siivekkäisistä kantapäästään kumpaankin korvaan,
          ellauri241.html on line 103: Blushed into roses ´mid his golden hair, punastui ruusuiksi kultaiseen jakauxeensa asti,
          ellauri241.html on line 104: Fallen in jealous curls about his shoulders bare. kaatoi Brylcremiä kateellisiin kiharoihin hartioilleen.
          ellauri241.html on line 106: Breathing upon the flowers his passion new, puhaltaen kukille uutta intohimoaan,
          ellauri241.html on line 108: To find where this sweet nymph prepar´d her secret bed: Löytääkseen, missä tämä suloinen nymfi valmisti salaisen sänkynsä:
          ellauri241.html on line 116: "When from this wreathed tomb shall I awake! "Milloin tästä seppeleestä haudasta herään!
          ellauri241.html on line 121: Round bush and tree, soft-brushing, in his speed, Pyöreä pensas ja puu pehmeästi harjautuivat hänen vauhdissaan,
          ellauri241.html on line 145: And thus; while Hermes on his pinions lay, Ja näin; sillä aikaa Hermes makasi sulkasatoisena
          ellauri241.html on line 146: Like a stooped falcon ere he takes his prey. kuin kumartunut haukka ennen kuin hän ottaa saaliinsa.
          ellauri241.html on line 155: Deaf to his throbbing throat's long, long melodious moan. Kuurona hänen sykkivän kurkkunsa pitkälle melodiselle voihkeelle.
          ellauri241.html on line 171: Light flew his earnest words, among the blossoms blown. Keppanana lensi hänen vakavat sanansa, kukkien siivellä.
          ellauri241.html on line 173: "Too frail of heart! for this lost nymph of thine, "Liian hauras sydän! Sillä tämä kadonnut nymfisi,
          ellauri241.html on line 204: She breathed upon his eyes, and swift was seen hän hengitti hänen silmiinsä, ja nopeasti näki
          ellauri241.html on line 214: So done, upon the nymph his eyes he bent, Sen tehtyään, nymfiin päin käänsi silmänsä,
          ellauri241.html on line 250: With the bright mists about the mountains hoar Vuorten kirkkaissa sumuissa kähisten
          ellauri241.html on line 282: And kept his rosy terms in idle languishment. Ja piti hänen ruusuiset terminsä tyhjäkäynnillä.
          ellauri241.html on line 284: Why this fair creature chose so fairily Miksi tämä kaunis olento valitsi niin reilusti
          ellauri241.html on line 293: Or where God Bacchus drains his cups divine, Tai missä Jumala Bacchus tyhjentää jumalaiset kuppinsa
          ellauri241.html on line 308: The eastern soft wind, and his galley now Itäinen pehmeä tuuli, ja hänen keittiönsä nyt
          ellauri241.html on line 314: Jove heard his vows, and bettered his desire; Jove kuuli hänen lupauksensa ja pani potin nokkiin;
          ellauri241.html on line 316: From his companions, and set forth to walk, tovereistaan ​​ja lähti kävelemään,
          ellauri241.html on line 323: Close to her passing, in indifference drear, Paahtoi siitä ihan läheltä kauhistuttavan välinpitämättömänä,
          ellauri241.html on line 327: His mind wrapp3d like his mantle, while her eyes Hänen mielensä kietoutui hänen vaippaansa, kun hiänen silmänsä
          ellauri241.html on line 328: Followed his steps, and her neck regal white seurasivat hänen askeleita, ja hiänen kaulansa kuninkaallisen valkoisena
          ellauri241.html on line 337: And soon his eyes had drunk her beauty up, Ja pian hänen silmänsä olivat juoneet hänen kauneutensa,
          ellauri241.html on line 340: Lest she should vanish ere his lip had paid ettei hän katoaisi, ennen kuin hänen huulensa olisi osoittanut ansaittua
          ellauri241.html on line 342: Her soft look growing coy, she saw his chain so sure: Hiänen pehmeä ilmeensä muuttui hurjaksi, hiän näki vetoketjunsa niin varmaxi:
          ellauri241.html on line 345: For pity do not this sad heart belie Sillä sääli älä usko tätä surullista sydäntä,
          ellauri241.html on line 358: Said Lamia, "here, upon this floor of clay, sanoi Leimi, "tänne, tälle savilattialle,
          ellauri241.html on line 380: Put her new lips to his, and gave afresh laittoi uudet huulensa hänen huulilleen ja antoi uudeksi
          ellauri241.html on line 387: And then she whispered in such trembling tone, ja sitten hän kuiskasi niin vapisevalla äänellä,
          ellauri241.html on line 391: His drooping head, and clear his soul of doubt, roikkuvan "päänsä" ja puhdistamaan hiänen "sielunsa" epäilystä,
          ellauri241.html on line 395: Inhabited her frail-strung heart as his. asuivat hiänen hauraassa "sydämessänsä" kuin hänenkin.
          ellauri241.html on line 396: And next she wondered how his eyes could miss Ja seuraavaksi hän ihmetteli, kuinka hänen silmänsä saattoivat missata
          ellauri241.html on line 411: To hear her whisper woman´s lore so well; Kuuntelemaan hiänen kuiskaavan naisen tarinaa niin pirun hyvin;
          ellauri241.html on line 422: So threw the goddess off, and won his heart niin heitti hiän jumalattaren tittelit pois ja voitti hänen sydämensä
          ellauri241.html on line 450: Muffling his face, of greeting friends in fear, Myssyttäen kasvonsa, hän tervehtii ystäviä peloissaan,
          ellauri241.html on line 455: Into his mantle, adding wings to haste, ohittivat, vaippaansa, lisäten siivet kiireelle.
          ellauri241.html on line 462: Yourself from his quick eyes?" Lycius replied, itsesi hänen nopeilta silmiltään?" Lycius vastasi:
          ellauri241.html on line 496: Had Lycius lived to hand his story down, Jos Lycius olisi elänyt jakamaan tarinansa,
          ellauri241.html on line 499: To breed distrust and hate, that make the soft voice hiss. synnyttämään epäluottamusta ja vihaa, jotka saavat pehmeän äänen sihisemään.
          ellauri241.html on line 502: Hovered and buzzed his wings, with fearful roar, leijui ja suristi siipiään pelottavalla pauhinalla,
          ellauri241.html on line 506: For all this came a ruin: side by side Kaikesta tästä tuli raunio: vierekkäin
          ellauri241.html on line 519: But left a thought, a buzzing in his head. Mutta jätti ajatuksen, surinan päähän.
          ellauri241.html on line 525: Saw this with pain, so arguing a want Näki tämän tuskalla, jäbä nähtävästi väitti kaipaavansa
          ellauri241.html on line 530: "Why do you sigh, fair creature?" whispered he: "Miksi huokaat, kaunis olento?" hän kuiskasi:
          ellauri241.html on line 557: Of sorrows at his words; at last with pain Suruisna hänen sanojensa johdosta; vihdoin tuskalla
          ellauri241.html on line 558: Beseeching him, the while his hand she wrung, Rukoillen häntä, samalla kun hiän väänteli hänen kättänsä,
          ellauri241.html on line 559: To change his purpose. He thereat was stung, muuttaakseen hänen tarkoitustaan. Se pisti häntä,
          ellauri241.html on line 561: Her wild and timid nature to his aim: hiänen villi ja arka luontonsa tavoitteelleen:
          ellauri241.html on line 562: Besides, for all his love, in self despite, Sitä paitsi kaikesta hänen (ize)rakkaudestaan huolimatta,
          ellauri241.html on line 563: Against his better self, he took delight Vastoin parempaa itseään ​​hän iloitsi
          ellauri241.html on line 573: When to the bridal he should lead his paramour. jolloin morsiamexi hänen tulisi johtaa hoitonsa.
          ellauri241.html on line 574: Whispering in midnight silence, said the youth, Kuiskaamalla keskiyön hiljaisuudessa ernu sanoi:
          ellauri241.html on line 579: Fit appellation for this dazzling frame? sopiiko nimi tälle häikäisevälle kehykselle?
          ellauri241.html on line 601: With other pageants: but this fair unknown Mainoskulkueiden kanssa: mutta tämä reilu tuntematon
          ellauri241.html on line 603: (Lycius was gone to summon all his kin) (Lycius meni kutsumaan kaikki sukulaisensa)
          ellauri241.html on line 636: When dreadful guests would come to spoil her solitude. kun kauhistuttavat vieraat tulisivat pilaamaan hänen yksinäisyyttään.
          ellauri241.html on line 661: Of younger friends; yet must I do this wrong, kuitenkin minun on tehtävä tämä vääryys,
          ellauri241.html on line 665: Turning into sweet milk the sophist's spleen. pehmentäen maitomaisesti happamen sophistin pernaa.
          ellauri241.html on line 688: By minist'ring slaves, upon his hands and feet, ministeriorjien toimesta käsiinsä ja jalkoihinsa,
          ellauri241.html on line 690: Pour'd on his hair, they all mov'd to the feast kaadettiin hänen molempiin karvaisiin päihinsä (Ps. 23:5),
          ellauri241.html on line 693: Whence all this mighty cost and blaze of wealth could spring. mistä kaikki tämä mahtava hinta ja rikkauden liekki voisi syntyä.
          ellauri241.html on line 716: Might fancy-fit his brows, silk-pillow'd at his ease. silkkityynyillä rönöttäen rauhassa.
          ellauri241.html on line 723: The thyrsus, that his watching eyes may swim tyrsus, jotta hänen tarkkaavaiset silmänsä uivat
          ellauri241.html on line 725: Let spear-grass and the spiteful thistle wage keihäsruoho ja ilkeä ohdake käyvät
          ellauri241.html on line 726: War on his temples. Do not all charms fly sotaa hänen ohimoillaan. Eivätkö kaikki loizut lennä vittuun
          ellauri241.html on line 739: Till, checking his love trance, a cup he took Kunnes, keskeyttääxeen rakkaustranssinsa, kuppia hän otti
          ellauri241.html on line 742: From his old teacher's wrinkled countenance, vanhan opettajansa ryppyisiltä kasvoilta,
          ellauri241.html on line 744: Had fix'd his eye, without a twinkle or stir oli kiinnittänyt silmänsä pilkettä tai hämmennystä
          ellauri241.html on line 749: ´Twas icy, and the cold ran through his veins; Se oli jäinen, ja kylmä kulki hänen suonissaan;
          ellauri241.html on line 751: Of an unnatural heat shot to his heart. epäluonnollisen lämmön kivut syöksyivät hänen sydämeensä.
          ellauri241.html on line 752: "Lamia, what means this? Wherefore dost thou start? "Lamia, mitä vittua tää tarkoittaa? Miksi taas aloitat?
          ellauri241.html on line 756: More, more he gaz'd: his human senses reel: Enemmän, enemmän hän katsoi: hänen apinan aistinsa pyörivät:
          ellauri241.html on line 766: And not a man but felt the terror in his hair. Ja joka mies tunsi kauhun hiuksissaan.
          ellauri241.html on line 777: Of all the Gods, whose dreadful images siis näiden joiden kauhistuttavat kuvat
          ellauri241.html on line 783: For all thine impious proud-heart sophistries, kaikkien jumalattomien ylpeyssydämesi viisastelujen,
          ellauri241.html on line 787: Mark how, possessed, his lashless eyelids stretch Kas kuinka riivatusti sen ripsettömät silmäluomet venyvät
          ellauri241.html on line 788: Around his demon eyes! Corinthians, see! sen demonisilmien ympärille! Krimin tataarit, ziigatkaa!
          ellauri241.html on line 790: "Fool!" said the sophist, in an under-tone "Hölmö!" sanoi sofisti alasävyisesti röyhkeällä
          ellauri241.html on line 794: "Fool! Fool!" repeated he, while his eyes still "Hölmö! Hullu!" toisti tää, samalla kun hänen silmänsä eivät vielä
          ellauri241.html on line 796: Of life have I preserv'd thee to this day, minä olen suojellut sinua tähän päivään asti,
          ellauri241.html on line 798: Then Lamia breathed death breath; the sophist's eye, Sitten Lamia henkäisi kuoleman hengenvedon; sofistin silmä,
          ellauri241.html on line 807: As were his limbs of life, from that same night. niin kuin hänen 5 raajaa elämästä, siitä samasta yöstä laskien.
          ellauri241.html on line 808: On the high couch he lay! his friends came round Korkealla sohvalla hän makasi! hänen ystävänsä tulivat ympärille,
          ellauri241.html on line 863: Not charioted by Bacchus and his pards, Ei Bacchuksen ja hänen partyjensa vaunuissa,
          ellauri241.html on line 897: The voice I hear this passing night was heard Äänen, jonka kuulen tänä kuluvana yönä, kuuli
          ellauri241.html on line 965: Stuck his glans a-down those inmost glens,

          ellauri241.html on line 966: Never again saw he his happy penis

          ellauri241.html on line 967: But his brethren bleat with content.
          ellauri241.html on line 984: And, for those simple times, his garments were

          ellauri241.html on line 985: A chieftain king's: beneath his breast, half bare,

          ellauri241.html on line 990: A lurking trouble in his drooping nether lip,

          ellauri241.html on line 991: And see that oftentimes his "spear" would slip

          ellauri241.html on line 992: Through his forgotten hands.
          ellauri241.html on line 1000: The script, with needments, for this mountain air;

          ellauri241.html on line 1033: plus Peonia, his sweet sister: of all those,

          ellauri241.html on line 1036: his needle broidery.
          ellauri241.html on line 1041: And still, a-sleeping, held his finger-tips

          ellauri241.html on line 1046: opening his eyelids with a healthier brain. I feel great again!

          ellauri241.html on line 1103: This earthly love has power to make

          ellauri241.html on line 1128: Alas! 'tis his old grief, nothing new:

          ellauri241.html on line 1131: This time a little nymphet turned up,

          ellauri241.html on line 1134: Her ringlet round his fingers, saying:

          ellauri241.html on line 1153: After a moment's reflection, he stuck his dick

          ellauri241.html on line 1154: Into the fearful deep, to hide his prick

          ellauri241.html on line 1158: Sharpening, by degrees, his appetite

          ellauri241.html on line 1165: (I've seen this, in an endoscopic video!)
          ellauri241.html on line 1169: Ah, this feels good, push deeper still!

          ellauri241.html on line 1182: Of fondest beauty; with his limp

          ellauri241.html on line 1184: Taste his juicy pears! Here is cream

          ellauri241.html on line 1186: LOL! it is Adonis, safe in the privacy of this mancave.

          ellauri241.html on line 1195: A sovereign quill is in his waving hands;

          ellauri241.html on line 1196: No sight can bear the lightning speed of his bow;

          ellauri241.html on line 1198: What to think of it; from forth his sides

          ellauri241.html on line 1200: A scowl is sometimes on his brow, sometimes he grunts like a sow.
          ellauri241.html on line 1204: He had begun a plaining of his woe.

          ellauri241.html on line 1206: Favour this gentle youth; his days are numbered.

          ellauri241.html on line 1215: By Jove! he bowed, though his arse was still sore,

          ellauri241.html on line 1219: To his capable ears, silence was music from the holy spheres;

          ellauri241.html on line 1221: Yet still I feel immortal! This is great!

          ellauri241.html on line 1228: For just listen to this crap:

          ellauri241.html on line 1233: Be ever in these arms? in this sweet spot

          ellauri241.html on line 1248: Let me entwine thee surer, with this rope —now

          ellauri241.html on line 1251: Enchantress! tell me by this soft embrace,

          ellauri241.html on line 1257: This passion-fruit, how divine -

          ellauri241.html on line 1280: Or thou wilt force me from this secrecy,

          ellauri241.html on line 1308: Had pass'd away; his dick hung limp.

          ellauri241.html on line 1309: Justa a huge wet stain adorned his widow'd bed.
          ellauri241.html on line 1312: Drunken from pleasure's nipple; and his love

          ellauri241.html on line 1320: On all his life: his youth, up to the day

          ellauri241.html on line 1322: He stept upon his shepherd throne: the look

          ellauri241.html on line 1323: Of his white palace, its cozy breakfast nook,

          ellauri241.html on line 1375: Against his pallid face: he felt the charm

          ellauri241.html on line 1396: All this in Saturn's vintage store, and more!

          ellauri241.html on line 1418: Beside this old man lay a flaccid wand,

          ellauri241.html on line 1419: And in his lap 3 cups, with which he conn'd

          ellauri241.html on line 1422: So as not to miss his moving hands.
          ellauri241.html on line 1425: He woke as from a trance; his snow-white brows

          ellauri241.html on line 1427: Furrow'd deep wrinkles in his forehead large,

          ellauri241.html on line 1429: Till round his wither'd lips had gone a smile.

          ellauri241.html on line 1431: He rose: he grasp'd his stool, 'twas still warm,

          ellauri241.html on line 1441: When I have cast this serpent-skin of woe? I know!

          ellauri241.html on line 1457: This sucker will take my place.

          ellauri241.html on line 1463: In this cold region? Will he let me freeze,

          ellauri241.html on line 1465: Or will he touch me with his searing hand,

          ellauri241.html on line 1482: This horrid spell Would melt at thy sweet breath.

          ellauri241.html on line 1487: I care not for this old mysterious man!”
          ellauri241.html on line 1492: Like cum of yesterday of his youthful pleasures:

          ellauri241.html on line 1495: of dolphins who were his playmates; shapes unseen

          ellauri241.html on line 1498: The crown of his life was utmost quietude.

          ellauri241.html on line 1541: But thou must nip this tender innocent

          ellauri241.html on line 1549: Well next I came by this here manual,

          ellauri241.html on line 1551: Anyway, it tells about this other guy,

          ellauri241.html on line 1558: “We are twin brothers in this destiny!

          ellauri241.html on line 1562: Come to this glasshouse full of stiffs,

          ellauri241.html on line 1573: This mighty consummation made,

          ellauri241.html on line 1578: And the great Sea-King bow'd his dripping head.

          ellauri241.html on line 1583: Of love? Now this is cruel.

          ellauri241.html on line 1598: For one this weak to venture his poor verse

          ellauri241.html on line 1599: At such a length as this. Ow do not curse, Br'er Criticks!

          ellauri241.html on line 1612: Theban Amphion leaning on his lute:

          ellauri241.html on line 1615: Oh no, this was just too much for Endymion.

          ellauri241.html on line 1631: The speaker's introduction at the beginning of Book 4 is significantly shorter than in the previous three books. He speaks to his muse of his native land whose great days are now over as anyone can tell from Endymion. The shepherd-prince overhears a distressed Indian Maiden who longs for someone to love. Endymion finds himself instantly smitten with the Maiden. He is desperately conflicted because he now appears to be in love with the three women Cynthia, Diana, and the Indian Maiden.
          ellauri241.html on line 1635: Endymion has an intense love for the goddess of his dreams but he professes his love to the Indian Maiden. He believes that his declaration of love seals his death and he asks for the goddess to sing a song to him so he can die peacefully. Within her song is the story of how she ended up wandering the forest alone. She says that she joined the god Bacchus and his cult of followers and traveled across countries. She witnessed people of multiple nations fall to Bacchus and decided to flee on her own. The Maiden ended up in the woods where she and Endymion have met.
          ellauri241.html on line 1637: Endymion declares that he will let go of the possibility of immortality so that he can love and adore the Maiden instead. The god Mercury appears and strikes the ground with his magic wand. Winged horses arrive to fly Endymion and the Indian Maiden into the sky where the shepherd-prince dreams that he is in Olympus which is the sanctuary of the gods. He is conflicted when he suddenly sees Diana who is also known as Phoebe and she looms over him. Endymion looks over at the sleeping Indian Maiden and "could not help but kiss her: then he grew / Awhile forgetful of all beauty save / Young Phoebe's, golden hair'd; and so 'gan crave Forgiveness." Once again he looks at the Maiden with adoration, but Phoebe begins to fade away, and he protests in panic. The noise awakens the sleeping Maiden next to him. In this moment Endymion chooses to abandon Diana and immortality as he professes to the Maid, "I love thee! and my days can never last. I always love the one that is readily available, she is the best." They soar through the sky and the Indian Maiden grows pale and suddenly vanishes before Endymion's eyes. Ow fuck! He cries out in surprise and grief as he finds himself alone yet again.
          ellauri241.html on line 1639: The Maiden reappears to the shepherd-prince as he returns to earth. Endymion is overcome with relief and joy and says that he has wasted too long searching for nothing but a dream and wants to start a life with the Maiden. She tells him that they cannot be together because he is forbidden to her. They wander through the forest and are quiet and somber until Endymion sees his sister Peona in the distance. They rush together and embrace. Peona implores Endymion to "weep not so" and "sigh no more" for the Indian Maiden can be his queen of Latmos. Endymion responds that "a hermit young, [he will] live in mossy cave" but Peona can visit him regularly. The resigned shepherd-prince leaves behind a confused Peona and Maiden and visits the altar of Diana to "bid adieu / To her for the last time." Peona and the Indian Maiden arrive. Endymion watches in stunned disbelief as the Indian Maiden transforms into his beloved Diana. It is revealed that Cynthia, Diana, and the Indian Maiden are the same woman. Actually Peona too! For all practical purposes, all women are the same: one hole up front and two more in the pants. Endymion swoons and after "three swiftest kisses" they vanish together leaving Peona who walks home in wonderment.
          ellauri241.html on line 1645: The poem has been criticized for its inconsistencies and its somewhat disappointing conclusion. Seems Keaz whisked the guy away at the end quickly before he could get into any more mischief. He was probably thoroughly fed up with him. But then again Jack was just 22. Endymion presents many problems to its interpreters, as it did to Jack himself. Critics have, however, been able to agree that the poem contains considerable eroticism.
          ellauri242.html on line 61: Nyt ryömii sinisen pallon pinnalla 8 miljardia vastenmielistä kuhisevaa termiittiapinaa. Hyi helvetti. Tulis luoti ja tappais. Kenties ne käpristyvät ja kuolevat kun lämmitystä käännetään kuumemmalle 3 astetta. Täytyy toivoa.
          ellauri242.html on line 176: Kaksiosaisen Neuvostoliiton novellin historian (1965) kirjoittajat panivat merkille Perventsevin teosten riittämättömän korkean taiteellisen tason: monimutkaisten sosiaalisten ja psykologisten tilanteiden yksinkertaistettu kuvaus, ns. "tuotantogenre", konfliktin kaavamaisuus, tyylin yksitoikkoisuus. Jos yhden tai toisen ideologisen opin noudattaminen on viime kädessä henkilökohtainen asia ja ihmisoikeus, niin vakavien taiteellisten virheiden esiintyminen kirjailijan työssä on kylläxo rangaistavaa.
          ellauri242.html on line 201: Kesäkuun puolivälissä puolet Kerchissä sijaitsevista viidestä saksalaisrykmentistä siirrettiin louhoksille, ja he kärsivät merkittäviä tappioita taisteluissa.
          ellauri242.html on line 266:
          Revanshistinen Wikipedia.fi puhuu nätistä Shura Kollontaista hyvin rumasti. Stalinin houkutuslintu muka, tshort vazmi!

          ellauri243.html on line 45: The policeman pulled out his gun and shouted, "Freeze!"

          ellauri243.html on line 84: Kunnottomat paskiaiset (engl. Inglourious Basterds, tahallinen väärinkirjoitus nimelle Ignominious Bastards) on vuonna 2009 ensi-iltansa saanut Quentin Tarantinon käsikirjoittama ja ohjaama mustan huumorin sävyttämä sotaelokuva. Sen pääosissa esiintyvät Brad Pitt (goy), Christoph Waltz (goy), Michael Fassbender (goy), Eli Roth (Jew), Diane Kruger (goy), Daniel Brühl (goy), Til Schweiger (goy) ja Mélanie Laurent (Jew). Elokuva kertoo vaihtoehtoiseen historiaan perustuvan tarinan kahdesta salajuonesta, joilla oli tarkoitus salamurhata natsi-Saksan poliittiset johtajat. Toisen suunnittelee nuori ranskanjuutalainen elokuvateatterin omistaja (Laurent), ja toisen luutnantti Aldo Rainen (Pitt, vilket träffande namn) johtama amerikanjuutalaisista sotilaista koostuva ryhmä. Sakemannit oli natohenkisinä mukana tätä leffaa tekemässä into piukeena, samalla periaatteella mätkimässä "nazeja" kuin nato paraikaa mätkii "putinisteja". Huvittavinta koko jutussa on että ukrainalaiset ovat ryssille samaan aikaan lyhyesti nazeja.
          ellauri243.html on line 100: Paskiaisista Raine, Donny Donowitz ja Omar Ulmer (kaikki vainajia) soluttautuvat ensi-iltaan Marxin veljesten valeasuissa esittäen italialaisia, toivoen etteivät toistaidottomat saksalaiset huomaisi heitä. Landa puhuu kuitenkin italiaa sujuvasti (opittuaan sitä Dan Steinbockin kirjan lopusta) ja juttelee hetken Paskiasten kanssa siansaxaa (pig latin) ennen kuin lähettää Donowitzin ja Ulmerin paikoilleen. Landa vie Hammersmithin sivuun ja varmistuttuaan kengän kuuluvan Hammersmarkille kokeilemalla sitä kaikkien läsnäolevien naisten jalkaan hän kuristaa tämän kuoliaaksi. Raine ja yksi hänen miehistään, ukrainalais-amerikkalainen Smithson Utivich, otetaan vangiksi, mutta Landa kertoo antavansa verilöylyn edetä "normaalisti" kiitoxexi Hammersmithin lähes koskemattomuudesta.
          ellauri243.html on line 102: Elokuvan aikana Häyhä meni projektorihuoneeseen tapaamaan Shosannaa. Kun Shosanna torjuu hänen iskuyrityksensä, hän muuttuu aggressiiviseksi. Shosanna teeskentelee myöntyvänsä ja ottaa sitten esiin pistoolin käsilaukustaan ja ampuu häntä. Kuolettavasti rakastunut Häyhä ottaa esiin oman "pistoolinsa" ja "ampuu" sillä Shosannaa. Elokuvan kohokohdassa siihen leikattu pätkä Shosannasta Häyhän alla kertoo yleisön kuolevan kohta juutalaisten käsissä. (Vizi mixi pahisten pitää aina pitää taukoa kertoaxeen uhreilleen että ne kohta tapetaan? Tappaisivat heti niin ei tulisi ikäviä takaiskuja.) Elokuvasalin ovet lukinnut Marcel sytyttää kasan palavaa nitraattifilmiä tuleen valkokankaan takana. Ulmer ja Donowitz murtautuvat Hitlerin ja Goebbelsin aitioon ja tappavat heidät. (Joo tää raina on vaihtoehtoista totuutta, oikeasti siinä kävi toisinpäin! Hitler ja Goebbels ampuivat mongertavat maahantunkeutujat lakoon saxalaisvalmisteisilla tarkkuuspistooleilla.) He ampuvat yleisön joukkoon konepistooleillaan, kunnes heidän pomminsa räjähtävät. Landa ja hänen radistinsa ajavat Rainen ja Utivichin kuin lampaat liittoutuneiden alueelle ja antautuvat heille ojassa. Aktin jälkeen Raine ampuu reilun pelin hengessä radistin ja kaivertaa hakaristin Landan otsaan. Lopuksi Quentin ilmestyy ruutuun ja toteaa: »Tämä on luultavasti mestariteokseni.» Juonipaljastukset päättyvät tähän. No mitä muuta siinä sitten tapahtuu? Eikös tässä ollut yhden illan märkien kaatioiden tarpeixi?
          ellauri243.html on line 107:
          We honor his service

          ellauri243.html on line 109: Yhdysvaltain sotahistorian tappavimpana sala-ampujana tunnettu laivastohylje Chris Kyle, joka palveli Irakin sodan aikana, on tullut tunnetuksi amerikkalaisena sala-ampujana. Vuonna 2003 Kylen joukko lähetettiin Irakiin. Nasiriyan kaupungissa hänen tiiminsä tarjosi katolla turvallisuutta merijalkaväelle maassa. Kerran hän näki naisen vetävän esiin kranaatin; Kyle käytti .300 Winchester Magnumia ja noudatti käskyään ampua, ampuen naisen pään tohjoxi ja pelastaen näin useiden lähellä olevien merijalkaväkivaltamiesten hengen.
          ellauri243.html on line 124: Dale Brown oli Amerikan paras militaristikynäilijä 2010-luvulla. Hauska nähdä vaihteexi miten pahisten kantapeikkojen juoni onnistuu without a glitch, ja tyhmät CIA ja FBI äijät niitetään lakoon kuin timoteit. We serve the true republic, not the false democracy. When were the good and brave ever in the majority, asks Henry David Thoreau. Never, answers Frans de Waal, for the majority is just apes like us.
          ellauri243.html on line 137: Compared with other U.S. races, American Indians have a life expectancy that is shorter than five years. The suicide rate among American Indian youth is 2.5 times higher than among youth in the rest of the country. American Indians are 2.5 times more likely to experience violent crimes than the national average, and more than four out of five American Indian women will experience parking meter violation in their lifetimes. Holy shit, these issues can be seen as symptoms of several larger issues, including access to social services, educational opportunities, nutritional food, and health care, and just plain old laziness and stupidity. Property rights pose more significant problems, insomuch as residents who don’t have deeds to the land on which they live struggle to build credit, which throws a significant barrier in front of upward mobility. Meanwhile, tribal lands are tough sells for franchises and other commercial developers that would bring jobs to reservations, as these companies are often resistant to negotiating contract terms under tribal law. So it's really all their own fault, them not playing along with good old free enterprise and private property!
          ellauri243.html on line 147: until the American Holocaust, when the United States was attacked by waves of Russian bombers launching hypersonic nuclear-tipped missiles. Almost the entire fleet of American long-range bombers and more than half of America's intercontinental-ballistic-missile arsenal was wiped out in a matter of hours. But Battle Mountain's little fleet of high-tech bombers, led by Patrick McLanahan, survived and formed the spearhead of the American counterattack that destroyed most of Russia's ground-launched intercontinental nuclear missiles and restored a tenuous sort of parity in nuclear forces between the two nations. On the plus side, there are now less than half so many hungry mouths left to feed on the entire ball of fire. Except this, everything goes on as before, business as usual.
          ellauri243.html on line 169: There may be no other organ on the human body that profits from such creativity in nicknaming by the larger populace. Not even clam, or twat. Below is a list of 100+ slang words for penis—from the common (prick) to the more grotesque (fuckpole) and the awesomely ridiculous (pork sword). Next time you need a synonym for penis, comb through this definitive list for a bunch of fun ideas!
          ellauri243.html on line 177: 1. Addressing the court 2. BJ 3. Bagpiping 4. Basket lunch 5. Beej 6. Blowie 7. Blowing the love whistle 8. Bobbing for apples 9. Bone-lipping 10. Buccal onanism 11. Brentwood hello 12. Charming the snake 13. Climbing the corporate ladder 14. Cock-gobbling 15. Copping a doodle 16. Courting the gay vote 17. Drinking a slurpee 18. Dropping on it 19. Earning your keep 20. Essin’ the dee 21. Face-frosting 22. Fellatio 23. Fluting 24. French abortion 25. Gator mouth 26. Getting a facial 27. Getting a lewinsky 28. Getting a throat culture 29. Getting to the cream filling 30. Giving cone 31. Giving face 32. Giving head 33. Gobbling pork 34. Going down 35. Gumming the root 36. Punching 37. Giving Big Jim and the twins a bath 38. Giving brain 39. Giving head 40. Gum-rooting 41. Gumming the green bean 42. Head job 43. Honkin’ bobo 44. Huffing bone 45. Hummer 46. Interrogating the prisoner 47. Kneeling at the altar 48. Knob job 49. Larking 50. Laying some lip 51. Licking the lollipop 52. Making mouth music 53. Making the blind see 54. Meeting with Mr. One-Eye 55. Mouth-fucking 56. Mouth-holstering the nightstick 57. Mouth-milking 58. Mouth-to-junk resuscitation 59. Opening wide for Dr. Chunky 60. Oral sodomy 61. Peeling the banana 62. Penilingus 63. Piston job 64. Playing pan’s pipes 65. Playing the pink oboe 66. Playing the skin flute 67. Pole-smoking 68. Polishing the trailer hitch 69. Pricknicking 70. Protein milkshake 71. Receiving holy communion 72. Respecting your superiors 73. Sampling the sausage 74. Scooby-snacking 75. Secretarial duties 76. Singing to the choir 77. Skull-buggery 78. Skull-fucking 79. Slobbin’ the knob 80. Smiling at Mr. Winky 81. Smoking the pink pipe 82. Smoking pole 83. Southern France 84. Speaking into the bonophone 85. Speaking low genitals 86. Spit-shining a baseball bat 87. Spraying the tonsils 88. Sucking off 89. Sucky-ducky 90. Suck-starting the Harley 91. Swallowing the baloney pony 92. Sword-wwallowing 93. Taking one’s temp with a meat thermometer 94. Talking into the mic 95. Telling it to the judge 96. Waxing the carrot 97. Worshiping at the altar 98. Wringing it dry 99. Yaffling the yogurt cannon 100. Zipper dinner
          ellauri243.html on line 182: There may be no other organ on the human body that profits from such creativity in nicknaming by the larger populace. Except penis. Below is a list of 60+ slang words for vagina —from the common (pussy) to the more grotesque (cunt) and the awesomely ridiculous (fishmarket). Next time you need a synonym for vulva, comb through this definitive list for a bunch of fun ideas!
          ellauri243.html on line 188: 1. Barking at the ape 2. Box lunch at the ‘Y’ 3. Breakfast in bed 4. Brushing one’s teeth 5. Carpet-munching 6. Chewing the she-Fat 7. Clam-jousting 8. Clam-lapping 9. Cleaning the fish tank 10. Connie lingus 11. Contacting the aliens 12. Conversing with moses 13. Devil’s kiss 14. Dinner beneath the bridge 15. Doing it the French way 16. Donning the Beard 17. Drinking from the furry cup 18. Eating at the ‘Y’ 19. Eating fur pie 20. Eating out 21. Eating the peach 22. Eating squirrel 23. Eating sushi from the barbershop floor 24. Eating tinned mussels 25. Egg mcmuff 26. Face-fucking 27. Facing the nation 28. Fanny-noshing 29. Fence-painting 30. French-kissing Mr. Lincoln 31. Fuzz sandwich 32. Giving face 33. Gnawing on roast beef 34. Going downstairs for breakfast 35. Going south 36. Gomorrahry 37. Gorilla in the washing machine 38. Growling at the badger 39. Gumming the monster 40. Husband’s supper 41. Kissing between the hips 42. Kissing the wookie 43. Lady braille 44. Lady Semaphore 45. Larking 46. Lapping the gap 47. Lapping the lint trap 48. Lick-a-chick 49. Lickety-slit 50. Licking anchovy 51. Lip service 52. Lip-synching to the fish-fueled jukebox 53. Low-calorie snacking 54. Making mouth music 55. Medicating the hairy paper cut 56. Mopping the vulva 57. Mustache-riding 58. Muff-diving 59. Mumbling in the moss 60. Munching the bearded clam 61. One-man band 62. Oyster-gargling 63. Parting the fuzz 64. Pastrami sandwich 65. Pearl-diving 66. Placating the beaver 67. Playing in the sandbox 68. Playing the hair harmonica 69. Prawn breath 70. Pruning the orchid 71. Pug-noshing 72. Pussy-nibbling 73. Seafood dinner 74. Sipping at the fizzy cup 75. Sitting on a face 76. Slurping at the furry coconut 77. Smoking the fur 78. Sneezing in the basket 79. Spa time For Lady Boner 80. Speaking in tongues 81. Spraying the crops 82. Tackling the Brazilian 83. Talking to the canoe driver 84. Talking to lassie 85. Telephoning the stomach 86. Testing the echo in the love cave 87. Testing the waters 88. Tipping the velvet 89. Tongue-fucking 90. Tonguing the bean 91. Trimming the hedges 92. Velvet buzzsaw 93. Wearing the feed bag 94. Wearing the Sticky Beard 95. Whispering into the wet ear 96. Whispering to Venus 97. Whistling in the dark 98. Worshiping at the altar 99. Yaffling 100. Yodeling in the canyon 101. January Nelson
          ellauri243.html on line 211: In addition to its prior history as an American symbol, the rattlesnake was seen at the time in Gadsden's birthplace of Charleston, South Carolina as a "noble and useful" animal that gave warning before it attacked.
          ellauri243.html on line 219: In the 1995 The Simpsons episode "Bart vs. Australia", Bart reveals in an act of "patriotism" the phrase "Don't Tread On Me" written across his buttocks when he is supposed to be kicked by the Australian Prime Minister as a punishment.
          ellauri243.html on line 270: Nicolas Cagella on hieman historiaa aseen hyppäämisessä ja naimisiinmenossa
          ellauri243.html on line 283: Think of this list as your ultimate resource for recent celebrity breakups
          ellauri243.html on line 287: broke up in 2021! Think of this list as your ultimate resource for recent
          ellauri243.html on line 290: celebrities are getting divorced?” then you should probably bookmark this.
          ellauri243.html on line 325: realized that his now-wife was the one, and confessed: "'I don't know what
          ellauri243.html on line 384: historianet.fi › kuka-rakastajatar Rakastajatar asuu Sveitsissä. Putin ei
          ellauri243.html on line 477: Dale Brown (born 2 November 1956) is an American writer and aviator known for aviation techno-thriller novels. At least thirteen of his novels have been New York Times Best Sellers.
          ellauri243.html on line 481: Dale Brown‘s source of wealth comes from being a novelist. How much money is Dale Brown worth at the age of 66 and what’s his real net worth now?
          ellauri243.html on line 484: In his personal life, Brown is a member of CAP. He is one of the pilots who regularly fly outpatients to get the attention that he craves. This is all done on a volunteer basis (but the kerosene is on the house), so he spends a lot of time flying across the country. In his free time, he enjoys flying in his own personal plane and he is a soccer referee for youth games.
          ellauri243.html on line 486: It is clear that Dale Brown never expected to be as successful as he has been. This is clear by his killing off of some characters, only to be resurrected in subsequent novels. He originally only intended to write 3 novels for his publisher. Now, 24 books later, he is an accomplished author and his fans are eagerly awaiting his next novel teeming with revenants.
          ellauri243.html on line 488: In April 2004, Brown pleaded guilty to charges of tax fraud. He was charged with creating companies in the West Indies for the purposes of receiving tax deductions from fictitious expenses. The fictitious expenses amounted to more than $440,000, which Brown claimed on his 1998 income tax filing. He used the tax deductions to remodel his retirement home in Incline Village, Nevada.
          ellauri243.html on line 490: It seems that Brown brings his two loves together in his life as in the novels, lying and aviation.
          ellauri243.html on line 492: Many of his works — including Flight of the Old Dog, The Tin Man, and Air Battle Force — focus on the adventures of a United States Air Force officer protagonist named Patrick McLanahan.
          ellauri243.html on line 493: Patrick´s wife is dead and his new lay Gia is MIA, but he has a beefy son. Brown is married. His wife Diane is a retired Sacramento police lieutenant and likes her husband who is also a pilot. They have a wimpy son, Hunter, near Lake Tahoe, Nevada.
          ellauri243.html on line 497: He enjoys flying his plane, a Grumman Gulfstream II. Like Patrick and his son Hunter, he is a mission pilot in the Civil Air Patrol. On the ground, he enjoys tennis, motorcycling, skiing, scuba diving, and ice hockey. He does enjoy other things like scuba diving and tennis, but cherishes spending time with his wife, Diane and his son Hunter, in their Lake Tahoe house. They all live together in Nevada.
          ellauri243.html on line 499: His first novel was Flight of the Old Dog and it launched his career. The plot of the book surrounds the mission of Gen. Bradley Elliot. He is testing a unique old bomber and the mission occurs to him to destroy a soviet weapon on site in Soviet Union before it is deployed. The aircraft is called Old Dog and it has to get the team to safety.
          ellauri243.html on line 504: Some people call this series the Paul McLanahan series and others call them the Dreamland series, based on the base in which the books are set. He has been writing this series for over 25 years now. This series is not to be confused with his other series, which is officially titled the Dreamland series and is a collaboration with another author who shall remain nameless.
          ellauri243.html on line 506: Brown’s books have never made it into movies. The closest they have come is with some of the characters appearing in computer games. When asked the question on his website, he said it would be cool if his books could be made into movies, however he doesn’t have an agent in Hollywood so the chances are low.
          ellauri243.html on line 508: He hopes to carry on writing books and maybe one will catch a director’s attention. He is working on writing some screenplays based on his books in the hope that he can get a Hollywood agent in the future.
          ellauri243.html on line 510: Dale Brown is still at the forefront of publishing novels today. He most recent novel, Tiger’s Claw, was released in August 2013. The plot of this book surround President Phoenix, Arizona, who has again slashed the military budget just when China begins to test it’s new domestic missile.
          ellauri243.html on line 512: America calls upon retired Patrick McLanahan to save the day with the good old bomber planes. It is a classic case of America vs. China, with the hope that World War 3 can be prevented. This has not been very successful so far. Some critics are going so far as to call him one of the saddest military adventure writers in America.
          ellauri243.html on line 518: Dale Brown is teaching Detroit the art of self-defense. Emhpasising on this, the Brown couple focus on disarming techniques, especially how to get hold of a gun and twist. "We show you how to take it so you can remove the weapon," Dale Brown went on, "all you're doing is increasing someone's potential for survivability in a worst case scenario."
          ellauri243.html on line 532: maverick pilot Patrick McLanahan uncovers disturbing evidence that the Russians are secretly arming their bomber fleet with nuclear warheads. Worse still, he realizes that despite the lessons of 9/11 the USA is still vulnerable to air attack by a determined enemy. But his warnings come too late. A flight of Russian bombers penetrate American airspace and launch devastating nuclear attacks on key airbases. As panic grips the country, McLanahan takes matters into his own hands and slips into Russia without leave with the elite Air Battle Force rapid-response team -- to strike back at the heart of the Russian bomber fleet. Fantastic fiction!
          ellauri243.html on line 538: FBI bird on pitempi kuin Pat ja sen avonainen pusero korostaa nätisti sen tissejä. Se puristaa Pättiä (kädestä) hirmu kovasti. Her job was to bat her eyes and shake her ass at suspects, but sadly, old Pat had lost his sense of touch. But beefy Brad is casting glances at her cleavage. Brad's eyes follow Cassandra's fan as she waddles back across the hangar. He has his seed bags hitched up and his pink torpedo all armed up for rapid deployment. Musta leski Cassandra valmistautuu nielemään sen hook, line and sinker. "Dreamer" January Nelsonia lainataxemme (yllä): get ready for suck-starting the Harley, swallowing the baloney pony, taking her temp with a meat thermometer.
          ellauri243.html on line 542: Tämmönen Bob Stearns kuoli hiljattain. Robert "Bob" H. Stearns, Columbia, SC * December 9, 1936 + January 5, 2023. Tämä Bob kyllä piti lentokoneista. He had a lifelong love affair with airplanes and flying, owned a half dozen aircraft and enjoyed meeting up with his flying buddies, meticulously restoring vintage aircraft and going to fly-ins. His health eventually clipped his wings, and after that he turned his attention to volunteering at Riverbanks Zoo and nurturing a latent talent for painting, which was discovered after Bob and Marge moved to Stilled Hopes.
          ellauri243.html on line 547:
          Bob at his most motivational in this video about Perp Potential.
          ellauri243.html on line 550: Bob Stearns, CEO of Powerful Potential. BOB STEARNS is one of only 95 people in history to lead an organization to win the prestigious Malcolm Baldrige Award. He was the Leader and Architect of Pittsburgh based Medrad’s 2003 journey to win the prestigious award. Medrad won the Baldrige award again in 2010. The Baldrige Award is presented annually by the President of the United States to organizations that excel in seven categories, including results. As Chief Human Resources Officer of CoManage, Bob led that company to be named the Best Place to Work in Pa.” He has also received the American Society for Training and Development Award for Excellence. Bob has served as a Director on the Boards of National Church Solutions, The Orchards at Foxcrest, the Pa. Society of Association Executives, the Pa. Association of Non Profit Organizations and a Woman owned business through Powerlink and Seton Hill University. Bob has owned and been the CEO of PowerfulPotential since 1985.
          ellauri243.html on line 552: Bob’s book which is titled” Perhaps a Man Can Change the Stars” is the basis for today’s program. He is a sought after Inspirational Speaker, having spoken in eight countries. He just launched a Nationwide Speaking Tour to share the messages from his book with as many people as he can.
          ellauri243.html on line 554: Bob´s book is about Perpetual Potential. Inside these pages, you will discover three invaluable lessons that will propel you closer to your true potential. The lessons will serve you well on either of two different, but parallel roads you may travel: The roads towards triumph or tragedy, as well as the roads in between. In 2003 the author, Bob Stearns was on top of the world. He led his company to win the most prestigious business award in the country, the Malcolm Baldrige award. Just five short years later, tragedy struck. Bob´s oldest son Eric was killed while on a study trip abroad in Athens, Greece. Eric was 21 years old at the time and was a junior at Penn State University. Although Eric lost his precious life in Greece, he found something sprawled under the pillars of the Acropolis that many people search for their entire lifetimes. He found inner peace in the knowledge that he could truly be anything he wanted to be, he could do anything he wanted to with his life. In his book "Perhaps a Man Can Change the Stars - Eric's Pursuit of Perpetual Potential", Bob shares with you three life lessons that allowed Eric to understand his true potential. Those same lessons helped Bob and his family deal with Eric´s death. The same lessons had enabled Bob to lead his company to triumph five years earlier. A key take away from the book is that no matter what stage of life you find yourself, you have the potential to explore. You have the potential to utilize and grow the talents and aspirations that you currently have. You have the potential to rekindle old talents that lie dormant, and to allow new talents to blossom. This is true regardless of age, circumstances, and what other people may be telling us. So read, explore and think deeply about how you can apply the three lessons that Bob learned from Eric. Decide for yourself how you can best use them. Indeed, our Potential is Perpetual!
          ellauri243.html on line 557: This Film details Eric Michael Stearns´ trip to Greece during his semester abroad n 2008. Eric learned three life lessons in Greece which lead.to achieving an Abundance of Potential. These lessons include:
          ellauri243.html on line 558: 1) Focus on what you do have, not on what you don´t have; 2) Tackle the toughest challenges and never quit; and 3) Change the Stars! Eric passed away during this trip, but he has inspired thousands of people through this outstanding Film.
          ellauri243.html on line 585: "Congelanse!" the "us" (not "them") border patrol agent shouted in Spanish through his van´s public-address loudspeakers.
          ellauri243.html on line 606: NEW YORK, NY - MARCH 8: David J. Mahoney and his wife, Hildegarde "Hillie" Merrill Mahoney, are photographed at 'Night of 100 Stars' event March 8, 1982 in New York City. Mr. Mahoney is the chairman of the Norton Simon conglomerate which includes Hunt´s ketchup, Max Factor´s cosmetics, and Johnnie Walker´s Scotch.
          ellauri243.html on line 613: In 1951 he went into business forming an advertising agency, David J. Mahoney, Inc. The company managed advertising for eight companies, including Exzema, White Rock and Good Humor. Mahoney sold his agency in 1956 and became President of Good Humor, and became President of Canada Dry in 1966.
          ellauri243.html on line 617: Mahoney wrote The Longevity Strategy: How to Live to 100 Using the Brain-Body Connection with Richard Restak, M.D. Foreword by William Safire (!). Mahoney died at 77 on May 1, 2000 at his home in Palm Beach, Florida, of heart failure. So much for longevity. Dave´s brain just disconnected from his body.
          ellauri243.html on line 627: And they stay on course because they constantly evaluate their progress, and make smart corrections to their process. Want to turn a dream into a reality? Follow this simple process.
          ellauri243.html on line 635: Or say you want to grow your business. "Increase revenue" sounds great but is too vague. "Land five new customers this month" is specific, objective, and measurable. You know exactly what you want to accomplish, which means you can create a process designed to get you there.
          ellauri243.html on line 647: Pilots use the 1 in 60 rule to remind themselves to constantly monitor their progress and make quick course corrections. You also know where you want to go. But you´ll never get there if you don´t regularly monitor and revise your goal based on your progress. And if you don´t start out on the right path. Remember, the 1 in 60 rule states that starting out, one degree off means winding up one mile off 60 miles later. Or so. So don´t just correct your course along the way. Create and follow a process that is proved to work. Pick someone who has achieved something you want to achieve. Like a Brad, if you happen to be a Ralph. Deconstruct his or her process. Then follow it, and along the way make small corrections as you learn what works best for you. That way, when you travel your own version of 60 miles, you´ll arrive precisely where you hoped to be. Up a shit creek without a paddle, with Brad 60 miles ahead of you. Forgot to warn: don´t pick a moving target!
          ellauri243.html on line 676: Minsk II:ssa suunniteltua liittovaltiorakennetta kohtaan ei ole koskaan ollut kiinnostusta. Ei koskaan ollut aikomustakaan antaa irtautuneille alueille Ukrainan historian ja sen kielten, kulttuurien ja perinteiden vaatimaa autonomiaa. Kaikkeen sitoutuminen oli vilppiä, jonka tarkoituksena oli pettää Moskovan ja Donbassin tasavallat, kun taas Ukraina aseisteli ja pommitti jälkimmäisiä helmikuussa alkanutta sotaa ennakoiden. Itävaltalainen koulukunta on heterodoksinen taloudellisen ajattelun koulukunta, joka kannattaa metodologisessa individualismin tiukkaa noudattamista, eli yhteiskunnalliset ilmiöt johtuvat yksinomaan yksilöiden motiiveista ja toimista. Itävaltalaiset kouluteoreetikot katsovat, että talousteorian tulisi perustua yksinomaan ihmisen ahneen toiminnan perusperiaatteisiin. Von Mises on yxi näitä piruja.
          ellauri243.html on line 686: Itävaltalainen koulu syntyi Wienissä Carl Mengerin, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerkin, Friedrich von Wieserin ja muiden töillä. Se vastusti metodologisesti historiallista koulukuntaa (sijaitsee Saksassa) kiistassa, joka tunnetaan nimellä Methodenstreit eli metodologiataistelu.
          ellauri243.html on line 701: Whoever tales most chesspieces off the board wins a Baskin Robbins certificate. This is not war its a game. Roxanne was already ignoring the senior beside her. Grabbing the wrong trackball, she won´t win the certificate!
          ellauri243.html on line 719: Disraeli was born in Bloomsbury, then a part of Middlesex. His father left Judaism after a dispute at his synagogue; Benjamin became an Anglican at the age of 12.
          ellauri243.html on line 722: Disraeli arranged for the British to purchase a major interest in the Suez Canal Company in Egypt. In 1878, faced with Russian victories against the Ottomans, he worked at the Congress of Berlin to obtain peace in the Balkans at terms favourable to Britain and unfavourable to Russia, its longstanding enemy. This diplomatic victory over Russia established Disraeli as one of Europe´s leading statesmen.
          ellauri243.html on line 724: World events thereafter moved against the Conservatives. Controversial wars in Afghanistan and South Africa undermined his public support. He angered British farmers by refusing to reinstitute the Corn Laws in response to poor harvests and cheap imported grain. With Gladstone conducting a massive speaking campaign, the Liberals defeated Disraeli´s Conservatives at the 1880 general election. In his final months, Disraeli led the Conservatives in Opposition.
          ellauri243.html on line 726: Disraeli wrote novels throughout his career, beginning in 1826, and published his last completed novel, Endymion, shortly before he died at the age of 76. Endymion tuli mainituxi albumissa 127, sehän oli se Keazin 50 sheidiä.
          ellauri243.html on line 730: Endymion is very like Benjy´s autobiography, with his boring English politics woven into the thread of the story. The action and conversations are distributed between characters who had figured in English politics and the fashionable romances of Europe during the last forty years.
          ellauri243.html on line 732: Endymion is Disraeli in his youth except in the story he is a true-blood British aristocrat. Zenobia, a queen of fashion, is based on his Lady Blessington with a combination of some other great lady. She was Benjamin Disraeli´s first great patroness, who opened the avenue of his wonderful career. Zenobia later retires to the background to give place to Lady Montfort. She is a combination of Lady Blessington and Mrs. Wyndham Lewis (the latter Disraeli married) so we have in Lady Montfort at once the patroness and the wife. It would be interesting to know if the rabbis got to cut Benjy´s prepuce before the falling-out with the synagogue? Maybe that is what the fight was all about?
          ellauri243.html on line 734: St Barbe, the journalist in " Endymion " is an intended caricature of Thackeray, and Gushy is Dickens. Vigo, a minor character of the novel, is a combination of Poole, the tailor, and George Hudson, the Sunderland railway king, as he was styled in his time. Prince Florestan is probably a sketch of Louis Napoleon in his early days in England. He is constantly presented as a child of destiny wailing for the European revolution of ´48 to give him back his throne.
          ellauri243.html on line 736: Job Thornberry comes into the story with the Anti-Corn-Law League, representing the remarkable change in English politics from the time before Napoleonic wars when the 10% richest guys were local landowners to after the wars when the merchants and industrialists had become the nobs (am. head honchos). This change of mens of production necessitated the passage of Reform Bills that favored Millian laissez-faire by the Conservative Derby-Disraeli ministries. Job Thornberry may be Richard Cobden; for he certainly has much of Cobden´s subject in him. The energetic and capable minister Lord Roehampton is taken to be Lord Palmerston, and Count Ferrol is perhaps Bismarck. Neuchatel, the great banker, is the historical Rothschild; Cardinal Henry Edward Manning figures as the tendentious papist Nigel Penruddock.
          ellauri243.html on line 762: 2. The other James Thomson, in full James Alexander Thomson, (born Dec. 20, 1958, Chicago, Ill., U.S.), is an American biologist who was among the first to isolate human embryonic stem cells. Thomson extracted stem cells from human embryos. However, this confronted him with a moral dilemma, as such an extraction is fatal to the embryo. After consulting with several bioethicists at the university, Thomson decided that continued research was ethical as long as the embryos, "created" by couples who "no longer wanted them" in order to "have children", would otherwise be "destroyed anyway." I just love medicinal ethics! Kunnon personismia. Montako neekeriä saa keilata pelastaaxeen yhden valkoisen joka työntää lastenvaunuja.
          ellauri244.html on line 64: Etova malli Tiina kuumui Roomassa etovasta Teresa-pazaasta josta on jo paasaus albumissa 81. Se kiihottui väkivaltaisista miehistä esim Uzi-konepistooleilla osoittelevista siisteistä israelilaissotamiehistä. Pakkelipakarainen lehmä. Lortto. Dan ei ilmeisesti tiedä mitä sana kertaalleen tarkoittaa. Se ei tarkoita toistamiseen. Toni työntyi Tiinan pakaroiden väliin kertaalleen.
          ellauri244.html on line 178: He worked despite having for 37 years "a state of permanently impossible relations" with his second master (deputy), John Jeudwine, which, according to school historian J.B. Oldham, "embittered both their lives to the detriment of the school, the scandal of the town and the embarrassment of Butler's every action"
          ellauri244.html on line 182: Charles Darwin, who recalled loathing the rote learning, was among his notable pupils, as was Butler's immediate successor as headmaster, Benjamin Hall Kennedy.
          ellauri244.html on line 188: Joseph Butler is best known for his criticisms of the hedonic and egoistic “selfish” theories associated with Hobbes and Bernard Mandeville and for his positive arguments that self-love and conscience are not at odds if properly understood (and indeed promote and sanction the same actions). In addition to his importance as a moral philosopher Butler was also an influential Anglican theologian.
          ellauri244.html on line 193: Keith Butler exposed! Bishop Butler and his wife live at the moment in a $1.3 million home in Troy, Michigan, for which they paid cash. In fact, over the last couple decades he has owned some 20 properties, almost all of them paid for in cash. They own several homes at the moment. Like other Word of Faith ministers like Robert Tilton, Butler preaches the "prosperity gospel", constantly browbeating their followers to "sow the seed of prosperty" by giving money to the church, which will supposedly be returned to them a hundred fold. They preach that godliness leads to wealth, thus stigmatizing the poor - if you aren't rich, you obviously just don't have enough faith or aren't a good enough Christian. This is pretty much a sure sign that you're dealing with a huckster.
          ellauri244.html on line 195: Word of Faith is home to many such frauds, from Kenneth Copeland to Kenneth Hagin to Frederick Price to Benny Hinn. Even by mainstream Christian standards, their theology is bizarre. They preach, for example, that God is powerless to act in the world except what Christians allow him to do by invoking his name in prayer. They also practice faith healing and teach that sickness is a sign of a weak faith (this despite the fact that lots of Word of Faith pastors and their wives have come down with cancer, heart disease, and so forth).
          ellauri244.html on line 359: Eli en taaskaan jaxanut ähertää Danin sekavaa psalttaria loppuun asti. Jäi epäselväxi oliko Toni hyvis vaiko pahis, ja kuuluiko tähän se oliko Toni juutalaisten agentti vai ehkä kaxoisagentti vaiko sittenkin vaan tyhmä lehtivalokuvaaja. Sama se, koko luotaantyöntävä pitkästyttävä remmi taitaa loppuvizeissä hukkua porukalla isoon verilammikkoon. Hyvä niin, ei oikeastaan voisi vähempää kiinnostaa.
          ellauri244.html on line 425: Tired of keeping them hidden inside or only having them come out in the bedroom, they’re all here in the form of some wickedly hot stories. Single-minded alpha hero, sinfully taboo relationships, and wildly over-the-top scenarios. If you love it extra dirty, extra hot, and extra naughty, this is the place for you! (Just don’t tell the other PTA members you saw her here…)
          ellauri244.html on line 433: The world Cassandra Faye created was rich with imagination and detail and the hero was the perfect mix of strength and tenderness. As with all her stories, there were some dark scenes that took me to the edge of my seat, yet the romance balanced the book perfectly. I lost sleep over this book staying up late to read 'just one more chapter'.
          ellauri244.html on line 439: Faye Madden's novels are sweet and wholesome, and through her richly crafted characters she explores all the heartache, pain, yet ultimately joyous happiness love brings, however that journey may unfold. Many of her novels explore this through the prism of a second chance romance, whilst others focus on love lost and found, or in unrequited love.
          ellauri244.html on line 445: In "The Struggle for the Right to Vote)," author Alice Faye Duncan chronicles the struggle for the right to vote in a book aimed at children. Faye Duncan is an educator, retired school librarian and prolific author... Alice Faye Duncan is the author of several books, including the classic NAACP Award-nominated board book, Honey Baby Sugar Child, and Just Like a Mama. Ms. Duncan is a school librarian in Memphis, Tennessee, and conducts writing workshops for parents and educators.
          ellauri244.html on line 447: Shon Faye - Writer, presenter and author of The Transgender Issue: An Argument for Justice She's Creative with Claire Hutchison Nghệ thuật Shon has written for the likes of The Guardian, Vice and Dazed and hosts the Call Me Mother podcast. Her upcoming book The Transgender Issue: An Argument for Justice comes out in September.
          ellauri244.html on line 461: Author: Jessica Hines | Posted in Critical Essays: Few witches in literary history have been as influential—or as maligned—as Morgan le Fay. By turns either the healer-ruler of the mystical island of Avalon or the arch-villainess of Arthurian legend, for more than nine hundred years Morgan has shaped popular perceptions of witchcraft.
          ellauri244.html on line 515: Omatunto kertoi sille että se oli narsisti joka halusi että tytöt ihailevat sitä estoitta, olla joku Raskolnikov vaikka se oli vaan hemmoteltu vetelys. Mut ei se mitään, ole vaan, sanoo omatunto sille ystävällisesti lopulta. Ei sun tarvi pinnistää, ole vaan menemättä lääkixen pyrkyreihin. - Niiniin mutta leväperseistä Sannaa ei voi mitenkään mainita Jonnan rinnalla. - Sinä et voi mitenkään elää etkä olla jollei sinua jumaloida, omatunto sihisi. (On vaikea kuvitella että kalanruotowiixisen Harrin omatunto koskaan karjaisisi tai ärjäisisi.)
          ellauri244.html on line 567: Part Four focuses on the period several hundred years after Jonathan and his students have left the Flock and their teachings become venerated rather than practiced. The birds spend all their time extolling the virtues of Jonathan and his students and spend no time flying for flying's sake. The seagulls practice strange rituals and use demonstrations of their respect for Jonathan and his students as status symbols. Eventually some birds reject the ceremony and rituals and just start flying. Eventually one bird named Anthony Gull questions the value of living since "...life is pointless and since pointless is by definition meaningless then the only proper act is to dive into the ocean and drown. Better not to exist at all than to exist like a seaweed, without meaning or joy [...] He had to die sooner or later anyway, and he saw no reason to prolong the painful boredom of living." As Anthony makes a dive-bomb to the sea, at a speed and from an altitude which would kill him, a white blur flashes alongside him. Anthony catches up to the blur, which turns out to be a seagull, and asks what the bird was doing:
          ellauri244.html on line 571: "No! No, that's not it." Anthony was awake and alive for the first time in his life, inspired. "What was that?"
          ellauri244.html on line 591: One of the first acknowledgments of Henry Miller as a major modern writer was by George Orwell in his 1940 essay "Inside the Whale", where he wrote:
          ellauri244.html on line 600: 1913 at 20 met Emma Goldman, the celebrated anarchist, in San Diego — “a turning point in my life”.
          ellauri244.html on line 602: Miller married his first wife, Beatrice Sylvas Wickens, in 1917, at 26; their divorce was granted on December 21, 1923, due to the 7-year itch. Together they had a daughter, Barbara, born in 1919.
          ellauri244.html on line 605: In 1923, while he was still married to Beatrice, Miller met and became enamored of a mysterious dance-hall ingénue who was born Juliet Edith Smerth but went by the stage-name June Mansfield. She was 21 at the time, 11 years his junior. They began an affair, and were married on June 1, 1924.
          ellauri244.html on line 609: Things began to change in Paris after meeting Anaïs Nin, 12 years his junior, who, with Hugh Guiler, went on to pay his entire way through the 1930s including the rent for an apartment at 18 Villa Seurat. Nin became his lover and financed the first printing of Tropic of Cancer in 1934 with money from Otto Rank. His works contain detailed accounts of sexual experiences. Sitä koitin vähän lukea mutta oli liian hapokasta, ei pystynyt.
          ellauri244.html on line 611: In 1939 Lawrence Durrell, 21 years his junior, invited Miller to Greece. Miller described the visit in The Colossus of Maroussi. Miller proved to be a major influence on the new Beat Generation of American writers, most notably Jack Kerouac, 31 years his junior, the only Beat writer Miller truly cared for.
          ellauri244.html on line 613: In 1944, Miller met and married his third wife, Janina Martha Lepska, a philosophy student who was 30 years his junior. They had two children: a son, Tony, and a daughter, Valentine. They divorced in 1952.
          ellauri244.html on line 615: The following year, he married artist Eve McClure, who was 37 years his junior. They divorced in 1960, and she died in 1966, likely as a result of alcoholism. In 1961, Miller arranged a reunion in New York with his ex-wife June. They had not seen each other in nearly three decades. In a letter to Eve, he described his shock at June's "terrible" appearance, as she had by then degenerated both physically and mentally. Not him! Though he was 11 years her senior!
          ellauri244.html on line 617: In 1967, at 77, Miller married his fifth wife, Japanese born singer Hoki Tokuda (ja:ホキ徳田),
          ellauri244.html on line 618: 46 years his junior. They divorced 1977, when he was 86 and she 40. Maybe Hoki's biological alarm clock went.
          ellauri244.html on line 620: After his move to Ocampo Drive, he held dinner parties for the artistic and literary figures of the time. His cook and "caretaker" was a young artist's model named Twinka Thiebaud, 54 years his junior, who later wrote a book about his evening "chats." In relation to reaching 80 years of age, Miller explains:
          ellauri244.html on line 624: During the last four years of his life, Miller held an ongoing correspondence of over 1,500 letters with Brenda Venus, a young Playboy model and columnist, actress and private dancer. A book about their correspondence was published in 1986. She was 56 years his junior.
          ellauri244.html on line 626: Miller died of "circulatory complications" at his home in Pacific Palisades, Los Angeles, on June 7, 1980, at the age of 88. Siitä tuli lopultakin vain 2-jalkainen. Ei päässyt enää polvilleen kiittelemään elämää, jolta se sai paljon. Mikä kulkee ensin 4 jalalla, sitten 2:lla ja lopuxi 3:lla? Ei ainakaan Henry.
          ellauri245.html on line 140: Nesbø on niin klicheinen että hampaita vihloo. LÄPYLÄP Okey boys! Back to work! Lets nail this bastard. Mitenkä monta kertaa tämäkin on kuultu ja nähty ziljoonissa skoude ja rofesarjoissa. Kiinnostavat jeparit joilla on yllin kyllin ongelmia izelläänkin hajaantuvat tehtäviinsä valokuvataulun ääreltä. Mä en jaxa näitä vitun rotinkaisia!
          ellauri245.html on line 165: This revolting info comes from Jo´s extremely boring autobio that just catalogues his successes.
          ellauri245.html on line 170: In November 2011, Miller posted remarks pertaining to the Occupy Wall Street movement on his blog, calling it "nothing but a pack of louts, thieves, and rapists, fed by Woodstock-era nostalgia and putrid false righteousness." He said of the movement, "Wake up, pond scum. America is at war against a ruthless enemy. Maybe, between bouts of self-pity and all the other tasty tidbits of narcissism you´ve been served up in your sheltered, comfy little worlds, you´ve heard terms like al-Qaeda and Islamicism." Miller´s statement generated controversy. In a 2018 interview, Miller backed away from his comments saying that he "wasn´t thinking clearly" when he made them and alluded to a very dark time in his life during which they were made.
          ellauri245.html on line 203: The popularity of "goblin mode" may be linked to a rejection of the carefully curated lifestyles often presented by users of social media platforms. The trend has also been linked to a manner of coping with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on society since this is described as a way of life that gives people permission to ditch societal norms and embrace their basic instincts and in social media, letting their inner goblin out has been a freeing experience.
          ellauri245.html on line 261: First devised and created in the Belgian Congo by King Leopold, son of Queen Victoria. A smooth metallic ball, slightly smaller than a tennis ball in circumference with tiny apertures along its contours. Made of gold, GAL-TAN, and steel, the ball is a minor feat of engineering. An additional small opening reveals a looped wire. The ball is placed in the victim´s mouth. When the wire is pulled, 24 tiny termite monkey antennae jut out from the ball, causing it to lodge itself in the mouth. At this point, though not overly painful, the victim cannot remove the ball, nor can another extract it for them. With a second pull of the wire, 24 needles erupt outwards from the extended antennae in 24 directions, causing severe damage to throat, cheek, tongue, palate, nasal cavity, etc....the victim will usually bleed out slowly in excruciating pain. How was this used for torture? It usually involved 2 victims. One who who was forced to swallow the ball, and the second who was forced to watch the effects. That second person would usually begin talking quickly about other things. Naah, too sophisticated. A waste on the Congolese niggahs. Cutting hands and feet worked just as well.
          ellauri245.html on line 267: Leopold´s Apple is actually a brand of whiskey. But The pear of anguish, also known as choke pear or mouth pear, is a torture device based on mechanisms of unknown use from the early modern period. The mechanism consists of a pear-shaped metal body divided into spoon-like segments that can be spread apart with a spring or by turning a key. Its proposed functionality as a torture device is to be variously inserted into the mouth, rectum, or vagina, and then expanded to gag or mutilate the victim. There is no contemporary evidence of such a torture device existing in the medieval era, and ultimately the utility of genuine apples and pears stuck in any hole at all remains unknown. Except that an apple forced in his mouth as a kid by his chum Anders B. got Jo Nesbø going as a pulp writer. Iron Maiden was a vagina dentata style box with nails inside.
          ellauri245.html on line 286: „Ein packendes Buch, mit einem Autor in Höchstform. Charaktere, Schauplätze und Dialoge sorgen dafür, dass beim Lesen keine Langeweile aufkommt. Dabei geht es nicht nur um einen brutalen Serien-Mörder, sondern auch um die Spätfolgen einer psychischen Demütigung, um Macht und Ehrgeiz, um menschliche Abgründe. Ein Genuss für Fans des skandinavischen Krimis, aber auch ein Schmankerl für Neueinsteiger.“
          ellauri245.html on line 313: One year ago, a heavily armed man dressed as a police officer appeared on the beach of a youth summer camp in Norway. The kids had no way of knowing he was targeting them for the ills of Europe. Then he started shooting. And shooting. Where were the real cops? By the end of the day, seventy-seven people had been killed, the deadliest attack in that country since World War II. As told by the survivors, these are the beat-by-beat horrors of those terrifying 198 minutes. the Utoya Massacre On July 22, 2011. Lue ja kauhistu, tää on hurja jännäri!
          ellauri245.html on line 366: Joku pahis kyttää Hakkia valkoisessa Corollassa. Mitä vittua?? Tää saatanan törkymöykky norski poijupää tekee kripo kolleegasta länkisäären finskin ja nimittelee sitä vielä mongoloidixi. "Jussi Kolkka", kyllä kai! Norjanlappalaisen näköinen suomalainen puhuu muka norjaa (haha) ja sylkee norskityyppisiä nuuskaklunsseja. Helkkari jos tää vitun Jonne olis tässä nyt ruuvaisin siltä irti kikkelin. Siinä on takuulla kierteet valmiina.
          ellauri245.html on line 447: The eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has a history of conflict, where various armies, rebel groups, and outside actors have profited from mining while contributing to violence and exploitation during wars in the region. The four main end products of mining in the eastern DRC are tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold, which are extracted and passed through a variety of intermediaries before being sold to international markets. These four products, (known as the 3TGs) are essential in the manufacture of a variety of devices, including consumer electronics such as smartphones, tablets, and computers. Tantaliittikapasiittorissa on enemmän kapassiteettia kuin alumiinisissa, mutta ne ovat kalliita, koska ne on tehty konfliktimineraalista.
          ellauri245.html on line 464: Nyt on pitemmälle lukematta selvä että sarjamurjoja ei ole kukaan muu kuin toi liian sievä kripopopopomo. Carl Micharl Bellman siis jonka leivissä on toikin norjansaamelainen sauna-apina. Harry ojentaa kolleegoita kuin äidinkielenopettaja. Olix Nääsnääsinkin vanhemmat opettajia? Jonne on ize hukkapätkä, 175-senttinen. Ei ihme eze laittaa hissikengät toimiessaan Harrynä.
          ellauri245.html on line 520: Siis onko tän kaverin nimi norjaxi Harry Hå? Eipäs olekaan? vaan: The name is derived from Old Norse Hólar, the plural form of hóll, meaning "round and isolated hill." Harry´s surname is also the name of a historic Norwegian town (Hole, Norway) with a heritage that goes back to the Viking Age. Eipäs, vaan: On July 22, 2011, the Workers´ Youth League summer camp, which took place on Utøya in Hole, was attacked as part of the 2011 Norway attacks.
          ellauri245.html on line 594: Among the material monists were the three Milesian philosophers: Thales, who believed that everything was composed of water; Anaximander, who believed it was apeiron; and Anaximenes, who believed it was air. Although their theories were primitive, these philosophers were the first to give an explanation of the physical world without referencing the supernatural; this opened the way for much of modern science (and philosophy), which has the same goal of explaining the world without dependence on the supernatural.
          ellauri245.html on line 608: Harry tunnisti fellow homsen heti kielenkäytöstä: pyllynreikämuotoisista vokaaleista, pienistä turhista pynttisanoista ja sössötyxestä. Sitäpaizi se oli barista eli keitti porukoille kahvia.. Kerman kanssa siitä saa kaxin verroin parempaa. Saludoa ja Kulta-Katriinaa.
          ellauri245.html on line 629: In the 20th century Burundi had three main indigenous ethnic groups: Hutu, Tutsi, and Twa. The area was colonised by the German Empire in the late 1800s and administered as a portion of German East Africa. In Burundi and neighboring Rwanda to the north, the Germans maintained indirect rule, leaving local social structures intact. Under this system, the Tutsi minority generally enjoyed its historically high status as aristocrats, whereas the Hutus occupied the bottom of the social structure. Princely and monarchal rulers belonged to a unique ethnic group, Ganwa, though over time the political salience of this distinction declined and the category was subsumed by the Tutsi grouping. During World War I, Belgian troops from the Belgian Congo occupied Burundi and Rwanda. In 1919, under the auspices of the nascent League of Nations, Belgium was given the "responsibility" of administering "Ruanda-Urundi" as a mandated territory. Though obligated to promote social progress in the territory, the Belgians did not alter the local power structures. Following World War II, the United Nations was formed and Ruanda-Urundi became a trust territory under Belgian administration, which required the Belgians to politically "edducate the locals and make them really fit", to prepare them for independence.
          ellauri245.html on line 634: historycollection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/30-May-1994-Thousands-of-Rwandan-refugees-cross-the-border-into-Tanzania-carrying-their-belongings.-Jeremiah-Kamau-Reuters.jpg" height="190px" />
          ellauri245.html on line 650: Suppressing the Mau Mau Uprising in the Kenyan colony cost Britain £55 million and caused at least 11,000 deaths, luckily mainly among the Mau Mau and other tarfaced forces, with some estimates considerably higher. This included 1,090 executions by hanging. The rebellion was marked by war crimes and massacres committed by both sides. The Mau Mau command, contrary to the Home Guard who were stigmatised as "the running dogs of British Imperialism", were relatively well educated.
          ellauri245.html on line 652: General Gatunga had previously been a respected and well-read Christian teacher in his local Kikuyu community. He was known to meticulously record his attacks in a series of five notebooks, which when executed were often swift and strategic, targeting loyalist community leaders he had previously known as a teacher.
          ellauri245.html on line 671: Jonas Gahr Støre, Norway´s Foreign Minister said: "I strongly react to the death sentence of two Norwegians ... Norway is a principled opponent of the death penalty and I will contact the DRC's foreign minister to gabble about this." According to Bloomberg.com "Norway also objected to the espionage conviction and the inclusion of the country in the fine, Stoere [sic] said. 'Norway isn't a part of this case.'" Sick. It is more than obvious that she was.
          ellauri245.html on line 677: Its 2022, Im 56 yrs old (born 1966 that is), kids grown, 5am, and feeling a little menopausal. Came back to a song that from the 1st time I heard it in my teens, I pictured the guy of my dreams singing to me. (Definitely not this wimpy tenor Chris with thinning bangles, but another more manly guy.) Didn´t we all? Definitely a classic! Greetings to us all narcissistic women of the eighties!
          ellauri245.html on line 696: But I hardly know this beauty by my side Kaunottaren mekossa
          ellauri245.html on line 715: Well, I hardly know this beauty by my side
          ellauri245.html on line 727: Tiedätkö mistä tietää olevansa erittäin, erittäinkin vanha? Siitä että krimisarjoissa jossa mennään penkomaan pahantekijöiden nuoruusaikoja kaikki muinainen on tapahtunut joskus 80-luvulla viiva millenniaalina, eli aikoina jotka on meidän izemme kannalta aivan liian uusia. Esim. tosta Cruella de Vile- Burghista ei mulla ole mitään havaintoa, eikä liioin äskeisen skotlantilaisen dekkarisarjan 90-luvun nuorisotapahtumista. Me ei oltu enää silloin nuoria! Tapahtuma-aikana menneitä penkova poliisineitonen oli kolmivuotias. Mutta sillä on vahva "moti", sanotaan "silmäyxessä."
          ellauri245.html on line 737: The Duchess of Sussex has prompted anger over her "mocking" demonstration of a curtsy to Elizabeth II. Royal author Gyles Brandreth, a friend of the royals, told TalkTV: "It's embarrassing, because it is mocking - and nobody curtsies to the Queen like that, and nobody would have advised her to do it that way." He added of Harry: "He would know that the bow, as it were, is a brief nod and the curtsy is to show respect for the sovereign, and in the case of the Queen - a lady in her 90s who actually had earned respect through a lifetime of service, and that was it. To do this sort of mocking thing is uncomfortable, but it is a cultural difference. It's like you would do a curtsy if you were playing in Snow White." Harry näyttää hitaalta neandertaliraukalta jonka ympärillä cromagnon-apina tekee piruetteja.
          ellauri245.html on line 750: Soon after graduation, Altman joined the United States Army Air Forces at the age of 18. During World War II, Altman flew more than 50 bombing missions as a co-pilot of a B-24 Liberator with the 307th Bomb Group in Borneo and the Dutch East Indies. Upon his discharge in 1947, Altman moved to California. He worked in publicity for a company that had invented a tattooing machine to identify dogs.
          ellauri245.html on line 755: Bonanzaa ja Maverickia tuli teeveestä 60-luvulla. Tosta Mashista mä oon nähnut jälkikäteen jotain tv jaxoja jotka oli aika käsittämättömiä.
          ellauri246.html on line 46: Agnon oli alkuperäiseltä nimeltään Shmuel Josef Czaczkes. Hän syntyi Butshatshin (Бучач; puol. Buczacz, jidd. Butshotsh [בעטשאָטש]) kaupungissa, silloisen Itävalta-Unkarin Galitsian maakunnassa. Galitsian alue oli kuulunut Puolaan ennen Puolan ensimmäistä jakoa (1772) sekä vuosina 1918-1939, nykyään se kuuluu Ukrainaan, ellei tule kohta jotain uutta jakoa. Butshatshissa oli holokaustiin asti suuri juutalaisväestö, joka käsitti 1930-luvulla yli puolet kaupungin asukkaista.
          ellauri246.html on line 54: Agnonin kertomus Morsiuskatos ilmestyi 1931, ja hänestä tuli sen ansiosta johtava hepreankielinen kirjailija. Hänelle myönnettiin kahdesti sekä Bialik-palkinto että Israelin valtion kirjallisuuspalkinto. Vuonna 1966 hän sai ensimmäisenä israelilaisena Nobelin kirjallisuuspalkinnon yhdessä Ruotsissa asuvan saksanjuutalaisen runoilijan Nelly Sachsin kanssa. Palkinnon vastaanottotilaisuudessa Agnon esitteli itsensä näin: ”Johtuen historiallisesta katastrofista, jossa Rooman keisari Titus tuhosi Jerusalemin ja Israelin kansa karkotettiin maanpakoon, minä satuin syntymään yhdessä maanpakolaisuuden kaupungeista. Mutta itse olen aina pitänyt itseäni syntyperäisenä jerusalemilaisena.”
          ellauri246.html on line 89: Bo Johannes Edfelt (21 December 1904 - 27 August 1997) was a Swedish writer, poet, translator and literary critic. A native of Tibro, Edfelt was elected to be a member of the Swedish Academy in 1969, occupying seat No. 17. He succeeded Erik Lindegren and, following his death, was succeeded by - who else but Horace Engdahl! A-HA! Aha jaha! Jaså på det lilla viset! Nu klarnar det!
          ellauri246.html on line 91: At first this poem seems very pastoral, but it was written in the summer of either 1940 or 1941. Sweden was not at war, but had seen Denmark and Norway occupied by Nazi Germany and Finland defeated by the Soviet Union. Ekelöf was firmly opposed to the totalitarian regimes, so see this poem as finding a moment of peace, pineapple and bananas in a time of other people's crisis.
          ellauri246.html on line 209:       Close by the street of this fair seaport town, Lähellä tän kauniin rantakaupungin katua.
          ellauri246.html on line 211:       At rest in all this moving up and down! Vaik laineilla hyppelee pienoinen pyppeli!
          ellauri246.html on line 302: in this world, hopeless material, tässä maailmassa toivotonta ainesta,
          ellauri246.html on line 394: Tuleva runoilija syntyi Leningradissa, joka on Pietarin ikivanha nimi. Esseessä "pienempi kuin yksiköt" Brodsky omistaa monia sivuja kuvaamaan jälkiläistä Leningradia. Näiden kilpailujen ja julkisivujen sekä klassisten, eklektisten ja modernistien mukaan hän opiskeli kulttuurin historiaa paremmin kuin myöhemmin kirjoissa. Mutta, ei petä Brodsky, kauniin kaupunkimuseon kohtauksessa oli elämää, jolla on keskittyminen, militarisointi. Kansalaisten, kuten koululaisten, tärkeimpänä hyveenä pidettiin tottelevaisuutta. Koulu antoi Brodskille ensimmäiset ärsyttävät väsyneet ideologian oppitunnit. 15-vuotiaana tuleva runoilija heittää koulua vesilinnulla ja harjoittaa lisää itsehallintaa. Hän uskoi, että kahdeksannesta palkkaluokasta on välttämätöntä aloittaa kapea erikoistuminen, koska nuori mies on terävä mieli ja erinomainen muisti, mutta hänellä ei voi vietävä ole aikaa opiskella tieteenaloja, jotka eivät koskaan tarvitse häntä.
          ellauri246.html on line 406: "Elexial Despoirin aihe rikkoi nuoren Brodskin runouden", kirjoittaa Viktor Erofeev ", erottelun, erottelun ja tappioiden aiheen matkan varrella." Tässä runossa oli konkreettinen ajattomattomuus, laajennus, hänessä ei ollut historiallista optimismia kuusikymmentäluvun työhön. Päinvastoin, se on hyvin pessimistinen, dramaattinen ja tragedia muistiinpanoja, joskus pehmennetty ironia. Mutta tämä tragedia ei ole avoimesti, ei pakotettu, vaan ikään kuin alateollisuuden ulkopuolella, ikään kuin tekijä lisäksi ei ole taipuvainen osoittamaan hengellisiä haavojaan, vaan hillizee izensä hyvin runollisten tunteiden ilmaisemiseen ja mieluummin sävy sävyyn.
          ellauri246.html on line 531: Mit vit? Nazi-Hydegger! Niinpä tietysti. Brodski havaitsi ajatuksen kielestä, joka on talon takana, joka kertoo meille runoilijoiden kautta, mitä on olla historiallinen ymmärrys. Runori omistaa intuitiiviset ja transsendenttiset tavat tietämään. Runojen riippuvuus kielestä, Brodsky tähdentää, ehdottomasti ja samanaikaisesti kirjastossa. "Kielellä on valtava keskipakopotentiaali. Runko on kielen olemassaolo. Ironia välinpitämättömyydelle, joka ilmenee tehtäessä runoutta valtiolle, usein politiikkaan on liittynyt tulevaisuuden välinpitämättömyys, joka aina edustaa runoja menneisyyteen. "Valtion filosofia, hänen etiikansa, puhumattakaan estetiikasta, on aina eilen." Kielen kautta runoilija luo kauniin luokan, joka "ei pure, haukkuu vaan, se on itsestään säilytys ihmisen vaistosta." Brodsky omistaa elämänsä luomaan kehittyneempiä muotoja, ennen kaikkea hengellistä olemassaoloa, jotta historiallinen prosessi ei häiritse ja mies ei häirinnyt.
          ellauri246.html on line 535: Vuosien mittaan Brodsky on selvästi tietoinen siitä, että hän omistaa itse asiassa sosiaalista ja historiallista merkitystä. "Lajiemme historiassa kirja - antropologinen ilmiö ... Kirja on keino liikuttaa kokemustilaa, kun sivut käännetään. Siirrä se tulee ... Lento yleisestä nimittäjältä ... henkilön suuntaan, erityisen suuntaan. " Tästä syystä Brodskin asenne kirjallisuudelle eze on lajillemme korkein tavoite, sillä se saisi aikaan henkilökunnan muutosta julkisesta eläimestä henkilökohtaisexi. Ja kasvottoman massan hallitsijana kirjoittaja kontrastoi vapaiden yksilöiden "apoteumista", ihmisen tyhmillistymistä täydellisyydestä. Suurella voimalla ekspressoidaan, suurella voimalla, ihmisen tragedia. Kulttuurin ja taiteen rooli paljastuu itsenäisen kehityksen, itsekäyttämisen, itsensä kehittämisen kannustamiseksi. Aika omaperäistä.
          ellauri246.html on line 547: Venäjän expatriaattikirjallisuudelle kokonaisuudessaan historialliset ja kulttuuriset motiivit ovat ominaisia. Jos koti on pitkällä, millaista taloa on lähellä? Monille maahanmuuttajille Venäjän kulttuuri on tullut niin taloksi. Monet vetoomukset hänelle. Joskus se johtaa kulttuurisen intertextin dekonstruktioon. Siten tapahtui "Venäjän terskin" Dmitri Bysheville. Hän sanoo, että lohko onnistui näkemään, miten venäläiset ihmiset "lensi" (vallankumous, sisällissota), mutta ihmiset taas putosivat orjuuteen. "Näetkö hänet hengellisellä voimalla?" Jopa monet USSR: ssä pettävät propagandat osoittavat, osoittaa BasyShev, että Venäjällä on vanhurskaita ja vanhurskas kylä (viittaus Solzhenitsyniin ja sananlaskuun "ei ole kylää ilman vanhurskautta"). Pitäen itseään Kuisman äidin poikana Basyshev yrittää kertoa totuuden XX vuosisadasta. Jos se nyt enää ketään kiinnostaa tässä vaiheessa.
          ellauri246.html on line 550: Putoaa hänen aikansa ja vuorossa on runoilija Lev Losev. Hän vetoaa Pushiniin. "Olegin rakkaan laulu on uusi historian versio, jossa Venäjä on kotimaassa paitsi venäläiset, vaan myös Khazar ja Tatarit ja kaikki muut, jotka ovat autuutta ajan myötä. Jatkuva pushkin, runoilija, jonka lyyrinen sankari on Khazar, sanoo, että profeetallinen Oleg, vaikka se valitaan polttaa kylät ja Niva, mutta ehkä se ei olisi ihan sen arvoista? Mayakovskin työssä Losev osittain lainaus on oma runo "Kozyrev Latchikin tarina". Kelaa ajatusta siitä, että jokaisella USSR: ssä on erillinen huoneisto. Huoneisto, "jossa voit vapaasti rakastaa", Neuvostoliiton unelma. Ja paxummat seinät kuten Stalinin aikana, ettei höyläys kuulu naapuriin. Vain tämän jälkeen on mahdollista sanoa, että Neuvostoliiton maa on "sopiva paikka elämään". Klassikoiden avulla eliitit lypsyy myyttejä.
          ellauri246.html on line 633: "Mitä minä haluan henkilökohtaisesti, joten näin jäin yksin itseni kanssa ja mitä voin tehdä. Ja tämän vuoksi olen äärettömän kiitollinen olosuhteista ja maalle. Olin aina houkutteli yksilöllisen vastuun henkeä ja yksityisen aloitteen periaate. Kuulet koko ajan täällä: Yritän nähdä, mitä tapahtuu. Yleensä elää muukalaisessa maassa, sinun täytyy rakastaa jotain hyvin paljon: lakien tai liiketoimintamahdollisuuksien henki tai kirjallisuus tai historia. Rakastan erityisesti kaksi asiaa: amerikkalainen runous ja [amerikkalaisen] lakien henki. Minun sukupolvi, joukko ihmisiä, joiden kanssa olin lähellä, kun olin kaksikymmentä, olimme kaikki individualisteja. Ja ihanteellinen tässä mielessä oli Yhdysvallat: täsmällisesti yksilöllisen hengen vuoksi. Siksi, kun jotkut meistä osoittautuivat täällä, meillä oli tunne, että he tulivat kotiin: osoittautuimme olemaan enemmän amerikkalaisia kuin paikallisia. "
          ellauri246.html on line 972: It is the details that delight. Donne hated milk. Mortally sick, about to celebrate his death by sitting for his portrait in a shroud, he was urged by his doctor that ‘by Cordials, and drinking milk twenty days together, there was a probability of his restoration to health’. Donne would have none of it. The doctor (a Dr Fox, son of the author of the ‘Boke of Martyrs’) insisted that his patient should at least try. Donne thereupon drank milk – but for ten days only. Then he told Dr Fox that he would not drink the stuff for another ten days even ‘upon the best moral assurance of having twenty years added to his life’.
          ellauri246.html on line 974: John Stubbs repeats this anecdote from Isaac Walton’s Life of Dr John Donne (1640), which remains a readable piece of work for all its faults. Walton was somewhat cavalier in matters of chronology, jumbling or telescoping events to suit his sense of emotional rightness. Tämä kasku löytyy myös Tauno Körilään Suuresta kaskukirjasta. Kaskuissa on aika lailla toistoa, koska Taunolla ei ollut käytössään tietotekniikkaa. No niin on näissä paasauxissakin, vaikka on.
          ellauri247.html on line 45:
          Pikkuserkkumme valokuvattuna meidän mielipuuhissa

          ellauri247.html on line 84: The Baiame story tells how Baiame came down from the sky to the land and created rivers, mountains, and forests. He then gave the people their laws of life, traditions, songs, and culture. He also created the first initiation site. This is known as a bora; a place where boys were initiated into manhood.
          ellauri247.html on line 89: Catherine Eliza Somerville Stow (1 May 1856 – 27 March 1940), who wrote as K. Langloh Parker, was a South Australian born writer who lived in northern New South Wales in the late nineteenth century. She is best known for recording the stories of the Ualarai around her. Her testimony is one of the best accounts of the beliefs and stories of an Aboriginal people in north-west New South Wales at that time. However, her accounts reflect European attitudes of the time. Anyways, she was not around before Ridley. William Ridley (14 September 1819 – 26 September 1878) was an English Presbyterian missionary who studied Australian Aboriginal languages, particularly Gamilaraay, before Catherine was more than a twinkle in her daddy's eye. Baiame may have been some abo hero before Bill's arrival, but the details about his doings could still be coloured by the Middle Eastern tentmen's literary treasure brought in by Bill.
          ellauri247.html on line 93: Narahdarn, the bat, wanted honey. He watched until he saw a Wurranunnah, or, bee alight. He caught it, stuck a white feather between its hind legs, let it go and followed it. He knew he could see the white feather, and so follow the bee to its nest. He ordered his two wives, of the Bilber tribe, to follow him with wirrees to carry home the honey in. Night came on and Wurranunnah the bee had not reached home. Narahdarn caught him, imprisoned him under bark, and kept him safely there until next morning. When it was light enough to see, Narahdarn let the bee go again, and followed him to his nest, in a gunnyanny tree.
          ellauri247.html on line 95: Marking the tree with his combo (stone tomahawk) that he might know it again, he returned to hurry on his wives who were some way behind. He wanted them to come on, climb the tree, and chop out the honey. When they reached the marked tree one of the women climbed up. She called out to Narahdarn that the honey was in a split in the tree. He called back to her to put her hand in and get it out. She put her arm in, but found she could not get it out again. Narahdarn climbed up to help her, but found when he reached her that the only way to free her was to cut off her ​arm. This he did before she had time to realise what he was going to do, and protest. So great was the shock to her that she died instantly. Narahdarn carried down her lifeless body and commanded her sister, his other wife, to go up, chop out the arm, and get the honey. She protested, declaring the bees would have taken the honey away by now. "Not so," he said; "go at once."
          ellauri247.html on line 97: Every excuse she could think of, to save herself, she made. But her excuses were in vain, and Narahdarn only became furious with her for making them, and, brandishing his boondi, drove her up the tree. She managed to get her arm in beside her sister's, but there it stuck and she could not move it. Narahdarn, who was watching her, saw what had happened and followed her up the tree. Finding he could not pull her arm out, in spite of her cries, he chopped it off, as he had done her sister's. After one shriek, as he drove his combo through her arm, she was silent. He said, "Come down, and I will chop out the bees' nest." But she did not answer him, and he saw that she too was dead. Then he was frightened, and climbed quickly down the gunnyanny tree; taking her body to the ground with him, he laid it beside her sister's, and quickly he hurried from the spot, taking no further thought of the honey. What a piece of shit.
          ellauri247.html on line 99: As he neared his camp, two little sisters of his wives ran out to meet him, thinking their sisters would be with him, and that they would give them a taste of the honey they knew they had gone out to get. But to their surprise Narahdarn came alone, and as he drew near to them they saw his arms were covered with blood. And his face had a fierce look on it, which frightened them from ​even asking where their sisters were. They ran and told their mother that Narahdarn had returned alone, that he looked fierce and angry, also his arms were covered with blood. Out went the mother of the Bilbers, and she said, "Where are my daughters, Narahdarn? Forth went they this morning to bring home the honey you found. You come back alone. You bring no honey. Your look is fierce, as of one who fights, and your arms are covered with blood. Tell me, I say, where are my daughters?"
          ellauri247.html on line 101: "Ask me not, Bilber. Ask Wurranunnah the bee, he may know. Narahdarn the bat knows nothing." And he wrapt himself in a silence which no questioning could pierce. Leaving him there, before his camp, the mother of the Bilbers returned to her dardurr and told her tribe that her daughters were gone, and Narahdarn, their husband, would tell her nothing of them. But she felt sure he knew their fate, and certain she was that he had some tale to tell, for his arms were covered with blood.
          ellauri247.html on line 103: The chief of her tribe listened to her. When she had finished and begun to wail for her daughters, whom she thought she would see no more, he said, "Mother of the Bilbers, your daughters shall be avenged if aught has happened to them at the hands of Narahdarn. Fresh are his tracks, and the young men of your tribe shall follow whence they have come, and finding what Narahdarn has done, swiftly shall they return. Then shall we hold a corrobboree, and if your daughters fell at his hand Narahdarn shall be punished."
          ellauri247.html on line 110:
          Translate this

          ellauri247.html on line 124: In 1898 the pioneer ethnologist W.E. Roth wrote a letter to the Australasian pointing out that gang-oo-roo did mean 'kangaroo' in Guugu Yimidhirr, but this newspaper correspondence went unnoticed by lexicographers. Finally the observations of Cook and Roth were confirmed when in 1972 the anthropologist John Haviland began intensive study of Guugu Yimidhirr and again recorded /gaNurru/.
          ellauri247.html on line 129: Cape Tribulation was named by British navigator Lieutenant James Cook on 10 June 1770 (log date) after his ship scraped a reef north east of the cape, whilst passing over it, at 6pm. Cook steered away from the coast into deeper water but at 10.30pm the ship ran aground, on what is now named Endeavour Reef. The ship stuck fast and was badly damaged, desperate measures being needed to prevent it foundering until it was refloated the next day. Cook recorded "...the north point [was named] Cape Tribulation because "here begun all our troubles".
          ellauri247.html on line 131: James Cook, RN named the river in 1770 after he was forced to beach his ship, HMS Endeavour, for repairs in the river mouth, after damaging it on Endeavour Reef. Joseph Banks named the river the Endeavours River but the form Cook used, Endeavour River, has stuck.
          ellauri247.html on line 133: Cook and his crew remained for almost seven weeks and made contact with the local Guugu Yimithirr Aborigines, while the naturalists Joseph Banks and Daniel Solander made extensive collections of native flora, while Sydney Parkinson illustrated much of the flora and fauna of the region. Botanical specimens were also collected by Alan Cunningham after he arrived on HMS Mermaid, captained by Philip Parker King on 28 June 1819.
          ellauri247.html on line 159: Kerran kun professori E. A. Tunkelo laatiessaan Vepsän kielen äännehistoriaa teki tutkimusmatkan Viroon, oli häneltä jäänyt ruokakomeroon vadillinen puuroa ja makkaranpalanen. Hän oli niistä niin huolissaan, että kirjoitti Virosta postikortin ruokaemännälleen, kuinka tämän tuli menetellä niitten kanssa: »Kaapissa on vadillinen puuroa. Sen saa neiti Bohm itse syödä samoin kuin makkaran, mutta jos makkara on homehtunut, voi sen antaa kissalle." Elna Hiekkala sanoi Eetitille Pikossa, että Eetit voi syödä lasten lautasille jättämät sinapit.
          ellauri247.html on line 167: Vapaamielisellä historioitsijalla Catherine Macaulaylla oli tapana väitellä ahdasmielisen tohtori Samuel Johnsonin kanssa yhteiskunnallisesta tasa-arvoisuudesta. Eräänä päivänä, kun Johnson oli aterialla mainitun naisen kotona, hän virkkoi emännälleen totisen näköisenä:
          ellauri247.html on line 177: The Tory Samuel Johnson was a critic of her politics: Sir, there is one Mrs. Macaulay in this town, a great republican. One day when I was at her house, I put on a very grave countenance, and said to her, "Madam, I am now become a convert to your way of thinking. I am convinced that all mankind are upon an equal footing; and to give you an unquestionable proof, Madam, that I am in earnest, here is a very sensible, civil, well-behaved fellow-citizen, your footman; I desire that he may be allowed to sit down and dine with us." I thus, Sir, shewed her the absurdity of the levelling doctrine. She has never liked me since. Sir, your levellers wish to level down as far as themselves; but they cannot bear levelling up to themselves. They would all have some people under them; why not then have some people above them?
          ellauri247.html on line 181: After travelling in Holland, Germany and Russia in 1776, Graham set up practice in Bath, Somerset. Advertisements promoting cures using "Effluvia, Vapours and Applications ætherial, magnetic or electric" attracted his first celebrity patient, the historian Catharine Macaulay. She became the subject of scandal in 1778 when she married James Graham’s 21-year-old brother William, who was less than half her age. At the end of 1792, Graham began to experiment with extended fasting to prolong his life. He died at his home in Edinburgh in 1794. Grahamille kävi kuin mustalaisen hevoselle, kuoli juuri kun oli oppimassa paastolle.
          ellauri247.html on line 191: Smollett ei ollut merkittävä, mutta hän on luonut klicheisiä hahmoja, jotka ovat olleet esikuvina myöhempien aikojen kirjailijoille, etenkin Charles Dickensille. Hän on kirjoittanut laajan Englannin historian History of England (1758) ja kääntänyt englanniksi Don Quijoten (1755). Smollett toimi laivalääkärinä 1741–1743 Länsi-Intian reitillä ja yritti suorittaa 1750x lääketieteen tutkinnon. Hän harjoitti ammattia jonkin aikaa Lontoossa, ennen kuin siirtyi vapaaksi kirjailijaksi ja toimittajaksi. Hän käänsi 38 osaa Voltairen teoksia englanniksi. Hän asui vuodesta 1769 Italiassa.
          ellauri247.html on line 193: Laurence Sterne, in his A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy, refers to Smollett under the nickname of Smelfungus, due to the snarling abuse Smollett heaped on the institutions and customs of the countries he visited and described in his Travels Through France and Italy.
          ellauri247.html on line 197: In W. M. Thackeray's novel Vanity Fair, Rebecca Sharp and Miss Rose Crawley read Humphry Clinker: "Once, when Mr. Crawley asked what the young people were reading, the governess replied 'Smollett'. 'Oh, Smollett,' said Mr. Crawley, quite satisfied. 'His history is more dull, but by no means so dangerous as that of Mr. Hume. It is history you are reading?' 'Yes,' said Miss Rose; without, however, adding that it was the history of Mr. Humphry Clinker."
          ellauri247.html on line 199: Charles Dickens's David Copperfield mentions that his young protagonist counted Smollett's works among his favourites as a child.
          ellauri247.html on line 201: John Bellairs referenced Smollett's works in his Johnny Dixon series, where Professor Roderick Random Childermass reveals that his late father Marcus, an English professor, had named all his sons after characters in Smollett's works: Roderick Random, Peregrine Pickle, Humphry Clinker, and even "Ferdinand Count Fathom", who usually signed his name F. C. F. Childermass.
          ellauri247.html on line 205: In Hugh Walpole's fifth novel Fortitude, the protagonist Peter refers to Peregrine Pickle as a text that inspired him to document his own memoirs.
          ellauri247.html on line 226: Veijariromaani eli pikareskiromaani kuvaa usein näennäisen omaelämäkerrallisessa muodossa kuvitteellisen tai historiallisen henkilön seikkailuja, vastoinkäymisiä ja urotekoja parodiseen ja satiiriseen tyyliin. Veijariromaanit ovat sietämättömän tylsiä, ja niiden hahmot voittopuolisesti paskiaisia.
          ellauri247.html on line 259: Smollett’s deep moral energy surfaced in two early verse satires, “Advice: A Satire” (1746) and its sequel, “Reproof: A Satire” (1747); these rather weak poems were printed together in 1748. Smollett’s poetry includes a number of odes and lyrics, but his best poem remains “The Tears of Scotland.” Written in 1746, it celebrates the unwavering independence of the Scots, who had been crushed by English troops at the Battle of Culloden. Not much of an improvement on the rest I'd say.
          ellauri247.html on line 261: "The learned Smelfungus travelled from Boulogne to Paris, from Paris to Rome, and so on, but he set out with the spleen and jaundice, and every object he passed by was discoloured or distorted. He wrote an account of them, but 'twas nothing but the account of his miserable feelings. I met Smelfungus in the grand portico of the Pantheon—he was just coming out of it. ''Tis nothing but a huge cockpit,' said he—'I wish you had said nothing worse of the Venus de Medici,' replied I—for in passing through Florence, I had heard he had fallen foul upon the goddess, and used her worse than a common strumpet, without the least provocation in nature. I popp'd upon Smelfungus again at Turin, in his return home, and a sad tale of sorrowful adventures had he to tell, 'wherein he spoke of moving accidents by flood and field, and of the cannibals which each other eat, the Anthropophagi'; he had been flayed alive, and bedevil'd, and used worse than St. Bartholomew, at every stage he had come at. 'I'll tell it,' cried Smelfungus, 'to the world.' 'You had better tell it,' said I, 'to your physician.'" (Sterne)
          ellauri247.html on line 263: Smollett was one of the first jacks of all trades to subsist entirely upon the earnings of his own pen. He had no extraneous means of support. He had neither patron, pension, property, nor endowment, inherited or acquired.
          ellauri247.html on line 268: Like Mr. Brattle, in The Vicar of Bulhampton, he was thinking always of the evil things that had been done to him. With the pawky (scottish: having a mocking or cynical sense of humour) and philosophic Scots of his own day (Robertson, Hume, Adam Smith, and "Jupiter" Carlyle) he had little in common, but with the sour and mistrustful James Mill or the cross and querulous Carlyle of a later date he had, it seems to me, a good deal.
          ellauri247.html on line 270: He summarised his Continental experience after this wise: inns, cold, damp, dark, dismal, dirty; landlords equally disobliging and rapacious; servants awkward, sluttish, and slothful; postillions lazy, lounging, greedy, and impertinent.
          ellauri247.html on line 273: Like Prior, Fielding, Shenstone, and Dickens, Smollett was a connoisseur in inns and innkeepers. He knew good food and he knew good value, and he had a mighty keen eye for a rogue. There may, it is true, have been something in his manner which provoked them to exhibit their worst side to him. What a nasty customer.
          ellauri247.html on line 279: Despite the doctor's unflattering portraits of Frenchmen, M. Babeau admits that his book is one written by an observer of facts, and a man whose statements, whenever they can be tested, are for the most part "singularly exact."
          ellauri247.html on line 284: DROIT D'AUBAINE, jus albinatus. This was a rule by which all the property of a deceased foreigner, whether movable or immovable, was confiscated to the use of the state, to the exclusion of his heirs, whether claiming ab intestato, or under a will of the deceased. The word aubain signifies hospes loci, peregrinus advena, a stranger.
          ellauri247.html on line 286: CICISBEO: In 18th- and 19th-century Italy, the cicisbeo (Italian: [tʃitʃiˈzbɛːo]; plural: cicisbei) or cavalier servente (French: chevalier servant) was the man who was the professed gallant or lover of a woman married to someone else. With the knowledge and consent of the husband, the cicisbeo attended his mistress at public entertainments, to church and other occasions, and had privileged access to this woman. The arrangement is comparable to the Spanish cortejo or estrecho and, to a lesser degree, to the French petit-maître.,(petit-maître m (plural petits-maîtres) (archaic) dandy, coxcomb). The exact etymology of the word is unknown; some evidence suggests it originally meant "in a whisper" (perhaps an onomatopeic word). Other accounts suggest it is an inversion of bel cece, which means "beautiful chick (pea)". According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first recorded usage of the term in English was found in a letter by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu dated 1718. The term appears in Italian in Giovanni Maria Muti's Quaresimale Del Padre Maestro Fra Giovanni Maria Muti De Predicatori of 1708 (p. 734).
          ellauri247.html on line 288: This arrangement, called the cicisbeatura or cicisbeismo, was widely practised, especially among the nobility of the Italian cities of Genoa, Nice, Venice, Florence and Rome. While many contemporary references to cicisbei and descriptions of their social standing exist, scholars diverge on the exact nature of the phenomenon.Some maintain that this institution was defined by marriage contracts, others question this claim and see it as a peculiarity of 18th-century customs that is not well defined or easily explained. Other scholars see it as a sign of the increasing emancipation of aristocratic women in the 18th century.
          ellauri247.html on line 292: Cicisbei played by set rules, generally avoiding public displays of affection. At public entertainments, they would typically stand behind their seated mistress and whisper in her ear. Customs of the time did not permit them to engage in relationships with any other women during their free time, making the arrangement rather demanding. Either party could decide to end the relationship at any time. A woman's former cicisbei were called spiantati (literally penniless, destroyed), or cast-offs.
          ellauri247.html on line 295: "If a Frenchman is capable of real friendship, it must certainly be the most disagreeable present he can possibly make to a man of a true English character. You know, madam, we are naturally taciturn, soon tired of impertinence, and much subject to fits of disgust. Your French friend intrudes upon you at all hours; he stuns you with his loquacity; he teases you with impertinent questions about your domestic and private affairs; he attempts to meddle in all your concerns, and forces his advice upon you with the most unwearied importunity; he asks the price of everything you wear, and, so sure as you tell him, undervalues it without hesitation; he affirms it is in a bad taste, ill contrived, ill made; that you have been imposed upon both with respect to the fashion and the price; that the marquis of this, or the countess of that, has one that is perfectly elegant, quite in the bon ton, and yet it cost her little more than you gave for a thing that nobody would wear.
          ellauri247.html on line 297: "If a Frenchman is admitted into your family, and distinguished by repeated marks of your friendship and regard, the first return he makes for your civilities is to make love to your wife, if she is handsome; if not, to your sister, or daughter, or niece. If he suffers a repulse from your wife, or attempts in vain to debauch your sister, or your daughter, or your niece, he will, rather than not play the traitor with his gallantry, make his addresses to your grandmother; and ten to one but in one shape or another he will find means to ruin the peace of a family in which he has been so kindly entertained. What he cannot accomplish by dint of compliment and personal attendance, he will endeavour to effect by reinforcing these with billets-doux, songs, and verses, of which he always makes a provision for such purposes. If he is detected in these efforts of treachery, and reproached with his ingratitude, he impudently declares that what he had done was no more than simple gallantry, considered in France as an indispensable duty on every man who pretended to good breeding. Nay, he will even affirm that his endeavours to corrupt your wife, or deflower your daughter, were the most genuine proofs he could give of his particular regard for your family.
          ellauri247.html on line 299: "If there were five hundred dishes at table, a Frenchman will eat of all of them, and then complain he has no appetite—this I have several times remarked. A friend of mine gained a considerable wager upon an experiment of this kind; the petit-maitre ate of fourteen different plates, besides the dessert, then disparaged the cook, declaring he was no better than a marmiton, or turnspit."
          ellauri247.html on line 300: "A Frenchman lays out his whole revenue upon taudry suits of cloaths, or in furnishing a magnificent repas of fifty or a hundred dishes, one-half of which are not eatable or intended to be eaten. His wardrobe goes to the fripier, his dishes to the dogs, and himself to the devil."
          ellauri247.html on line 308: Samuel Johnson (18 September 1709  – 13 December 1784), often wrongly called Dr Johnson, was an English writer who made lasting contributions as a poet, playwright, essayist, moralist, critic, biographer, editor and lexicographer. He was a devout Anglican, and a committed Tory. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography calls him "arguably the man using most four letter words in English history".
          ellauri247.html on line 316: His mother was 40 when she gave birth to Sam in the family home above his father's bookshop in Lichfield, Staffordshire. This was considered an unusually late pregnancy, so precautions were taken, and a man-midwife and surgeon of "great reputation" named George Hector was brought in to assist. The infant Johnson did not cry, and there were concerns for his health. His aunt exclaimed that "she would not have picked such a poor creature up in the street". Sillä oli pentuna risatauti (scrofula).
          ellauri247.html on line 318: Little is known about Johnson's life between the end of 1729 and 1731. It is likely that he lived with his parents. He experienced bouts of mental anguish and physical pain during years of illness; his tics and gesticulations associated with Tourette syndrome became more noticeable and were often commented upon.
          ellauri247.html on line 320: When William Hogarth first saw Johnson standing near a window in Richardson's house, "shaking his head and rolling himself about in a strange ridiculous manner", Hogarth thought Johnson an "ideot, whom his relations had put under the care of Mr. Richardson".
          ellauri247.html on line 323: <William Hogarth (10. marraskuuta 1697 Lontoo – 26. lokakuuta 1764 Lontoo) oli englantilainen taidemaalari ja graafikko, joka tunnetaan erityisesti suurta suosiota saavuttaneista kuvasarjoistaan. Hogarth oli erittäin taitava ja tarkka piirtäjä ja suosi runsaita yksityiskohtia ja groteskeja sävyjä. Hänen tyylinsä oli kova ja realistinen. Hogarth kuvasi kuparipiirrossarjoissaan aikaansa ja ihmishahmoja moralisoiden ja ivaten. Hogarth teki vuosina 1731–1732 ensimmäisen moralistisen piirrossarjansa ’Ilotytön tarina’. Hogarth oli äärimmäisen kansallismielinen eikä koskaan myöntänyt saaneensa vaikutteita ulkomaisilta taiteilijoilta vaikka oli käynyt kahdesti Pariisissa ja tuonut sieltä tuomisixi hyppykupan. Hogarth was born in London to a lower-middle-class family. Hogarth's works are mostly satirical caricatures, sometimes bawdily sexual. Kuvissa se on ilkimyxen näköinen. Sen suurin kyseenalainen ansio oli copyrightin laillistaminen. Stanley Kubrick based the cinematography of his 1975 period drama film, Barry Lyndon, on several Hogarth paintings. Muistan että se oli pitkäpiimäinen, en kyllä muista siitä muuta, koska se oli mun ja Seijan eka yhteinen elokuvaretki. Kubrick on kaiken kaikkiaan aika joutavanpäiväinen.
          ellauri247.html on line 326: According to Boswell "Sam commonly held his head to one side ... moving his body backwards and forwards, and rubbing his left knee in the same direction, with the palm of his hand ... He made various sounds" like "a half whistle" or "as if clucking like a hen", and "... all this accompanied sometimes with a thoughtful look, but more frequently with a smile. Generally when he had concluded a period, in the course of a dispute, by which time he was a good deal exhausted by violence and vociferation, he used to blow out his breath like a whale."
          ellauri247.html on line 327: Sam was an Oxford dropout because he was too poor to pay his way. He eventually did receive a degree for free: just before the publication of his Dictionary in 1755, the University of Oxford awarded Johnson the degree of Master of Arts. He was awarded an honorary doctorate in 1765 by Trinity College Dublin and in 1775 by the University of Oxford. Pelkkiä säälipisteitä.
          ellauri247.html on line 331: Johnson remained with his close friend Harry Porter during a terminal illness, which ended in Porter's death on 3 September 1734. Porter's wife Elizabeth (née Jervis) (otherwise known as "Tetty") was now a widow at the age of 45, with three children. Some months later, Johnson began to court her. William Shaw, a friend and biographer of Johnson, claims that "the first advances probably proceeded from her, as her attachment to Johnson was in opposition to the advice and desire of all her relations," Johnson was inexperienced in such relationships, but the well-to-do widow encouraged him and promised to provide for him with her substantial savings.
          ellauri247.html on line 333: I bet my bottom penny that Sam was at least a part-time faggot. The red cheeked Boswell more than probably blew smoke rings between his legs.
          ellauri247.html on line 335: Johnson had applied for the position of headmaster at Solihull School. Although Johnson's friend Gilbert Walmisley gave his support, Johnson was passed over because the school's directors thought he was "a very haughty, ill-natured gent, and that he has such a way of distorting his face (which though he can't help) the gents think it may affect some lads".
          ellauri247.html on line 337: With the widow's money, Johnson opened Edial Hall School as a private academy at Edial, near Lichfield. He had only three pupils: Lawrence Offley, George Garrick, and the 18-year-old David Garrick, who later became one of the most famous actors of his day. The venture was unsuccessful and cost Tetty a substantial portion of her fortune. Instead of trying to keep the failing school going, Johnson began to write his first major work, the historical tragedy Irene. Biographer Robert DeMaria believed that Tourette syndrome likely made public occupations like schoolmaster or tutor almost impossible for Johnson. This may have led Johnson to "the invisible occupation of authorship".
          ellauri247.html on line 339: In August, Johnson's lack of an MA degree from Oxford or Cambridge led to his being denied a position as master of the Appleby Grammar School. In an effort to end such rejections, the 4-ft Pope asked Lord Gower to use his influence to have a degree awarded to Johnson. Gower petitioned Oxford for an honorary degree to be awarded to Johnson, but was told that it was "too much to be asked". Gower then asked a friend of Jonathan Swift to plead with Swift to use his influence at the University of Dublin to have a master's degree awarded to Johnson, in the hope that this could then be used to justify an MA from Oxford, but Swift refused to act on Johnson's behalf.
          ellauri247.html on line 341: Between 1737 and 1739, Johnson befriended poet Richard Savage. Feeling guilty of living almost entirely on Tetty's money, Johnson stopped living with her and spent his time with Savage. They were poor and would stay in taverns or sleep in "night-cellars". Some nights they would roam the streets until dawn because they had no money. A-ha!
          ellauri247.html on line 343: Johnson bragged that he could finish his dictionary project in three years. In comparison, the Académie Française had 40 scholars spending 40 years to complete their dictionary, which prompted Johnson to claim, "This is the proportion. Let me see; forty times forty is sixteen hundred. As three to sixteen hundred, so is the proportion of an Englishman to a Frenchman." Rather, the proportion of the civilized vernacular vocabularies of the languages. What a pompous idiot. Although he did not succeed in completing the work in three years, he did manage to finish it in eight. Some criticised the dictionary, including the historian Thomas Babington Macaulay, who described Johnson as "a wretched etymologist."
          ellauri247.html on line 349: Johnson did not attempt to create schools of theories to analyse the aesthetics of literature. Instead, he used his criticism for the practical purpose of helping others to better read and understand literature. In his Preface to Shakespeare, Johnson rejects the previous dogma of the classical unities and argues that drama should be faithful to life.
          ellauri247.html on line 351: Beside his beliefs concerning humanity, Johnson is also known for his love of cats, especially his own two cats, Hodge and Lily.
          ellauri247.html on line 356: On 18 September 2017 Google commemorated Johnson's 308th birthday with a Google Doodle, thus sealing his celebrity forever and making him a man of unforgettable fame.
          ellauri247.html on line 363:     Had spoiled his nice new rattle.
          ellauri247.html on line 370: The words "Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum" make their first appearance in print as names applied to the composers George Frideric Handel and Giovanni Bononcini in "one of the most celebrated and most frequently quoted (and sometimes misquoted) epigrams", satirising disagreements between Handel and Bononcini, written by John Byrom (1692–1763):in his satire, from 1725.
          ellauri247.html on line 376: Strange all this Difference should be

          ellauri247.html on line 388: Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dum" is the opening song on Bob Dylan's 2001 album Love and Theft. Bob is famous for tweedling his dums and quite particularly his "D." Mom said don't but he did. (Tweedle twē′dl, v.t. to handle lightly: ( obs.) to wheedle.— v.i. to wriggle.)
          ellauri247.html on line 421: Lyhyenläntä rampa Pope syntyi samana vuonna kuin Mary. Pope oli Tory ja Mary äänesti Walpolea. - Amazing! I have read that Alexander Pope made passionate and wild love to Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. From this poem I understand that Pope loved the sense of wit and beauty that Lady Mary W. M. possessed.
          ellauri247.html on line 423: Linda Marshall - Not entirely true; Pope was smitten with LMWM but she rejected his advances (in fact she laughed at him because he was a cripple). After that he became a bitter enemies and both Pope and Lady Mary wrote vicious satirical poems about each other! But I´m a huge admirer of Pope´s work and as usual it´s superbly written. Although he never married, he had many female friends to whom he wrote witty letters, including Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. It has been alleged that his lifelong friend Martha Blount was his lover. His friend William Cheselden said, according to Joseph Spence, "I could give a more particular account of Mr. Pope's health than perhaps any man. Cibber's slander (of carnosity, abrmal fleshy protrusion growing on any part of the body) is false. He had been gay, but left that way of life upon his acquaintance with Mrs. B."
          ellauri247.html on line 493: Hän ei mennyt enää kalliin taiteilijan ateljeehen ja unohti pian koko asian. Puoli vuotta myöhemmin han meni erääseen taidenäyttelyyn. Seinällä oli valtava, 21 metrin pituinen Vernetin historiallinen maalaus, joka esitti Adb-el-Kaderin leirin valtausta. Sen edessä tungeksi sankka ihailijajoukko jotka hahatellen osoittivat jotain hahmoa. Paroni meni myös tarkastelemaan kuvaa.
          ellauri247.html on line 500: La Prise de la smalah d'Abd-el-Kader par le Duc d'Aumale à Taguin, le 16 mai 1843, est un tableau peint par Horace Vernet en 1845 et exposé au musée de l'histoire de France à Versailles.
          ellauri247.html on line 514: fantassin. (Fr.). A foot-soldier. This term is derived from the Italian fante, a boy, the light troops in the 14th and 15th centuries being formed of boys who followed the armies and were formed into corps with light arms, hence the origin of the word infantry.
          ellauri247.html on line 522: Cette "bataille" a été immortalisée par Horace Vernet en 1843. Le tableau est lattraction principale des salles d´Afrique créées par Louis-Philippe au musée de l´histoire de France à Versailles. Il a été interprété à la gravure sur acier par Augustin Burdet. Une plaque « rue Taguin, 1843 » existe encore, en 2014, à Dijon, sur une voie non publique. Taistelun nimi on riipustettu ranskalaisten sotalippuihin. Taisi olla sammakoiden ihan laitimmmaisia sotamenestyxiä.
          ellauri248.html on line 54: Britti-irkkujen fantastinen poliisipaska "Dublinin murhat" oli aivan ennenkuulumaton komppania muotopuolia kolmikymppisiä tyyppejä, joilla kaikilla oli joku hirmu dysfunktionaalinen lapsuushistoria takataskussa, paizi niillä joiden historioita ei edes ehditty kaivella mutta oli muuten vaan täysin sekoja. Välillä näytti siltä kun silloin tällöin vilautellut rahakonnat olis olleet asialla, mutta ei, eiköhän tästäkin tullut vaan jotain keskiluokkalaahuxen privaattia skizoilua. Omaisuus on länkkärien aivohuumeiden erityisessä suojeluxessa.
          ellauri248.html on line 83: Matt rated it shit: If I could, I'd probably rate this at 1.5 stars-- it ultimately pissed me off, and annoyed me throughout, but it was good enough to keep me reading and I suppose that should count for something. Maybe my opinion has been influenced by reading Stieg Larsson's masterful THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO FOR BOYS immediately prior to this one. That book wasn't perfect, but it had characters you rooted for, didn't wallow too much in pop culture references, and most importantly IT SOLVED THE FRIGGING MYSTERY.
          ellauri248.html on line 85: Let's go through a few of these points. First, I don't think I've ever read a mystery novel with a less likable main character/narrator. Rob (Adam) Ryan is an asshole, plain and simple. Sure, he's been warped by his childhood and circumstances, but he does just about every annoying thing you could possibly imagine-- he constantly navel-gazes and feels self pity, he sleeps with then immediately plays the stereotypical male "I don't want anything to do with you now" role with his female partner (the person we were told was his best friend, and whom he would never ever sleep with), he acts like an idiot over the 17 year old villain/ temptress/ psychopath/ whatever betraying his partner, and by the end of the book he is worse off than ever. I know that lots of detectives (esp. in hard-boild stories) are unlikable, and have many personal issues, but this guy just took the cake. I wanted to take a baseball bat to his head [hear, hear!]. To make matters worse, French throws in this little gem towards the end of the novel:
          ellauri248.html on line 87: "I am intensely aware, by the way, that this story does not show me in a particularly flattering light. I am aware that, within an impressively short time of meeting me, Rosalind had me coming to heel like a well-trained dog: running up and down stairs to bring her coffee, nodding along while she bitched about my partner, imagining like some starstruck teenager that she was a kindred soul. But before you decide to despise me too thoroughly, consider this: she fooled you, too. You had as good a chance as I did. I told you everything I saw, as I saw it at the time. And if that was in itself deceptive, remember, I told you that, too: I warned you, right from the beginning, that I lie." As if that excused anything... and NO, she didn't "fool" me, because YOU'RE the narrator and YOU'RE the one telling the story. This paragraph probably ticked me off more than anything else in the book.
          ellauri248.html on line 89: Second, the book seriously dates itself with little pop culture references... from Simpsons quotes to mentions of Ricky Martin and The Simple Life. Gah. The beginning of the book felt like a very special episode of FRIENDS where Chandler, Monica and Ross solve a mystery. I'm a pretty big pop culture type of guy, but the references dropped in this novel just annoyed me.
          ellauri248.html on line 91: The last part is a bit more controversial I suppose. There are two central mysteries in this book-- the first, what happened to Katy, DOES get solved in the course of the novel (the "big break" in the case is our hero realizing suddenly that the murder probably took place in a shed about 20 feet from where the body was found! Really?? No one bothered to think of that for a month?), but the deeper mystery about what happened to Rob/Adam and his friends is never resolved. Your mileage may vary about how annoying that is. Truth be told, it didn't annoy me as much as the fact that the true "villain" of the modern mystery walks without being punished in any way. How incredibly unsatisfying.
          ellauri248.html on line 96: I know this was a first novel, so hopefully things will improve for her second book. I know, also, that this book won a major award and that lots of people seem to love it to death, so maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. [mystery, whodunit]
          ellauri248.html on line 98: Justin rated it shit: The protagonist of this book really, really annoyed me. It felt like a parody of one of those old black-and-white movies where the picture freezes and the guy steps out toward the camera, lights a cigarette, pulls his hat down, and goes into this long monologue about life or women or his past or whatever. The action would pick up or a new lead would be uncovered, and here comes Rob rambling on for pages and pages.... and pages.
          ellauri248.html on line 102: Cassie: Oh wow! This thing we just found could connect this murder to events from your past! WHOA!
          ellauri248.html on line 108: Rob: Yeah, Cassie was like that. She was always finding connections to things and blah blah blah. She made a great partner because hey remember that time 20 years ago when my friends and I were in the woods and blah blah blah I want to tell you about all the people I work with and give you a brief description of each one of them and also explain in detail how my boss is and blah blah blah. My mind is trying to remember what happened 20 years ago and you know Cassie and I are great partners and we're best friends and people think we're dating but blah blah blah. Hey, time flies, man. Did I tell you what happened to me as a child? Did I remind you about Katy? Also, her family sure is weird. The people at the dig site are weird. Everyone is a suspect blah blah blah. Let me pause here to tell you how I deal with my roommate and also O'Kelly and my childhood and my current job and Katy and her weird family and interrogation and coffee and vodka and this dream I had and looking for clues and in the woods and we keep hitting dead ends and and and and and blahhhhhhhhhhhh.
          ellauri248.html on line 114: Nataliya rated it amazing: And it's not the murder story (stories?) but Rob's despair, mistakes, pain, and downward spiral and self-destruction that makes this book so painfully real and fascinating to read.
          ellauri248.html on line 116: And it is, without a doubt, my favorite part of this book.
          ellauri248.html on line 118: I loved this book to pieces, even though I could not shake off the overwhelming feeling of sadness and hollowness after finishing it. I loved it despite (or maybe because?) of the frustrating incompleteness of some plot lines, the frequent lack of resolution, and the unfulfillment of my wishes for the characters and events. [noir romance]
          ellauri248.html on line 120: Elle rated it shit: am going to try to explain this as spoiler-free [and what spoilers exist are noted] as possible: the ending of this book is maybe one of the most unsatisfying things I have ever read in my whole life. I am not kidding when I say it was such total trash that it ruined the whole book for me.
          ellauri248.html on line 125: And the worst part? The mystery from twenty years ago that causes this entire fucking BOOK and that was way more interesting than the normal mystery? Literally no fucking resolution. Who did it? How did they do it? What is up with that hair clip in the forest and the blood inside Rob’s shoes? NO ONE FUCKING KNOWS. I’m sure this is framed in the minds of many readers as some kind of deeper meaning about memory. You know what I thought, honestly? Tana French wrote herself into a corner with a fucking ridiculous case and then ran out of time on her deadline and decided to leave it open. [krimi, whodunit]
          ellauri248.html on line 127: Emily May rated it amazing: Needless to say, I was completely expecting something a bit dark and twisted, a creepy psychological murder mystery with an outcome I never would have seen coming. And I got that. But I never expected this book to leave me feeling so... sad. And you know why? Because I cared. Ms French carefully builds up a complex personality for each of her characters, complete with a past, a sense of humour and some serious issues to go with it all, and you can't help but care what happens to the detectives even more than you care what happens with the case.
          ellauri248.html on line 130: There's a touch of love in this book, just a touch, not enough to be called romance. No descriptive sex. No sweet-nothings. Nothing like that. And yet, it still fucking broke my heart. [noir romance]
          ellauri248.html on line 131: And I was honestly on the verge of tears after reading the ending and then reading friends' reviews of the second book in this series and discovering that we never get to hear more from Rob. [noir romance]
          ellauri248.html on line 134: I am eager to lose myself in her subsequent novels, which I hope are just as riveting. [Don't get fooled by Matt, he is a review professional fishing clueless readers to his own little pond. Bet he has not even read the book.]
          ellauri248.html on line 154: Schon 1873 hatte er in Basel Friedrich Nietzsche kennengelernt, 1875 entwickelte sich daraus eine Freundschaft. Im Winter 1876/1877 lebte er zusammen mit Nietzsche, Albert Brenner und Malwida von Meysenbug auf deren Einladung in Sorrent, wo sie gemeinsam philosophische Überlegungen anstellten und arbeiteten. In Sorrent entstand Rées Werk Der Ursprung der moralischen Empfindungen ebenso wie Teile von Nietzsches Menschliches, Allzumenschliches, Ausdruck von Nietzsches Abkehr von Wagner und Hinwendung zum „Réealismus“.
          ellauri248.html on line 171: Malwida von Meysenbug und Paul Rée entwickelten einen intensiven Briefwechsel. Die erhalten gebliebenen Briefe Malwida von Meysenbugs sind mehr als nur persönliche Dokumente einer Freundschaft, da der eine als „Materialist“, die andere als „Idealistin“ gegensätzliche Positionen einnahmen, die auch zwei Strömungen im 19. Jahrhundert bezeichnen. Die Briefe bieten auch Einsicht in das biographische Beziehungsgeflecht zwischen Nietzsche und Rée, von Meysenbug und Nietzsche sowie Lou von Salomé.
          ellauri248.html on line 238: "Laumavaisto" on tasaväkisempien tiimien keskinäinen (kieltämättä sekin etova) pelihenki joka oli liikunnallisesti lahjattomalle Wallulle kauhistus. Se istui mieluummin yxin puutarhamökissä pureskelemassa kyniä.
          ellauri248.html on line 244: In Daniel 6, Daniel is raised to high office by his royal master Darius the Mede. Daniel's jealous rivals trick Darius into issuing a decree that for thirty days no prayers should be addressed to any god or man but Darius himself; anyone who disobeys this edict is to be thrown to the lions. Pious Daniel continues to pray daily to the God of Israel; and the king, although deeply distressed, must condemn Daniel to death, for the edicts of the Medes and Persians cannot be altered. Hoping for Daniel's deliverance, Darius has him cast into the pit. At daybreak the king hurries to the place and cries out anxiously, asking if God had saved his friend. Daniel replies that his God had sent an angel to the jaws of the lions, "because I was found tasteless before them". The king commands that those who had conspired against Daniel be thrown to the poor overfed lions in his place with their tasty wives and children, and that the whole world should tremble and fear before the God of Daniel. Although Daniel is sometimes depicted as a young man in illustrations of the incident, James Montgomery Boice points out that he would have been over eighty years old at the time. No wonder perhaps that he did not entice the lions.
          ellauri248.html on line 288: Venäjää myötäilevien ja vastustavien poliittinen kamppailu on osa pitkää historiallista jatkumoa Suomen politiikassa. Juuret johtavat vähintään 1730-luvulle.
          ellauri248.html on line 343: Approximately 56.2 million acres, (87,000 Sq mi) are held in trust by the United States for various Indian tribes and individuals. These are variously called, reservations, pueblos, rancherias, missions, villages, and communities. This amount of land if it all was put in one place would be about the size of Idaho.
          ellauri248.html on line 347: There was also an allotment process starting in the Dawes Act of 1887 until 1934. This was to force more land from Native people. The ostensible reason was to make them individual landholders and thus “Americanized” members of a capitalist system. It was felt this would “solve” the “Indian problem”. In short that it would make them no longer part of the ethnic communities they were members of. However the main push to “solve” the “problem” was by Anglo-Americans who wanted to take that land. Thus land was distributed to tribal members and the “surplus” was given or sold at a cut rate to White Americans or turned into National Forests and Parks or military bases. Land owned by Native Americans decreased from 138 million acres in 1887 to 48 million acres in 1934. They lost 2/3s of their treaty land base. About 90,000 Native Americans were made landless.
          ellauri248.html on line 349: Today there is about 10,059,290 acres (15,700 sq miles) of individually owned lands are still held in trust for Native American allotees and their heirs. There are about four million fractional owner interests in this 10 million acres. Each generation the individual share gets less. One part of the Act was the establishment of a trust fund, administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, to collect and distribute revenues from oil, mineral, timber, and grazing leases on Native American lands. The BIA´s grossly mismanaged these funds. They were never collected or lost or stolen. This negligence in the management of the trust fund resulted in a number of lawsuits. The most well known is Cobell v. Salazar which led to a $3.4 billion settlement in 2009. The suit has forced proper accounting of revenues for the future but the settlement gave the litigants cents on the dollar.
          ellauri248.html on line 353: In contrast to the 2.3% of Native land, the Federal Government owns, as National Parks, Forests, BLM, US Ag land, Fish and Wildlife land, military reservations, wildlife refuges and so on, about 28% of the surface area of the US. That is 640 million acres, or 1 million sq miles. That 28% of the US land was and taken by force from tribes, as was all other state lands and privately held lands. If the US people so chose, we could more fairly address the large losses that Native people have had by transferring more of this land to Tribal governments.
          ellauri248.html on line 371: Käytännössä kiistakapuloina on kaksi aihepiiriä: seksi (seksuaali- ja sukupuoli-identiteetti) sekä rotu (rasismin merkitys Yhdysvaltain historiassa ja nyky-yhteiskunnassa).
          ellauri249.html on line 43:
          An example of a sōpio (see below), the god Mercury was depicted with an enormous penis on this fresco from Pompeii.

          ellauri249.html on line 76: Brodsky’s poetry bears the marks of his confrontations with the Russian authorities. “Brodsky is someone who has tasted extremely bitter bread,” wrote Stephen Spender in New Statesman, “and his poetry has the air of being ground out between his teeth. … It should not be supposed that he is a liberal, or even a socialist. He deals in unpleasing, hostile truths and is a realist of the least comforting and comfortable kind. Everything nice that you would like him to think, he does not think. But he is utterly truthful, deeply religious, fearless and pure. Loving, as well as hating.”
          ellauri249.html on line 78: The tenor of his poetry is not so much apolitical as antipolitical,” wrote Victor Erlich. “His besetting sin was not ‘dissent’ in the proper sense of the word, but a total, and on the whole quietly undemonstrative, estrangement from the Soviet ethos.” Art teaches the writer, he said, “the privateness of the human condition. Being the most ancient as well as the most literal form of private enterprise, it fosters in a man a sense of his uniqueness, of individuality, or separateness—thus turning him from a social animal into an autonomous ‘I.’
          ellauri249.html on line 80: It is precisely in this sense that we should understand Dostoyevsky’s remark that beauty will save the world, or Matthew Arnold’s belief that we shall be saved by poetry. It is probably too late for the world, but for the individual man (me) there always remains a chance. What distinguishes us from other members of the animal kingdom is speech. Literature—and poetry, in particular, my poetry—is, to put it bluntly, the goal of our species.” Minä minä! Täähän on pahempi egosentrikko kuin minä ja pikku-CEC Norjassa.
          ellauri249.html on line 82: Though many critics agreed that Brodsky was one of the finest contemporary Russian poets, some felt that the English translations of his poetry are less impressive. One is never quite allowed to forget that one is reading a second-hand version.
          ellauri249.html on line 103: Don virtaa hiljaa ja suht lyhkösenäkin Ukrainan ja Ryssän rajoilla Asovanmeren pohjukkaan. Siitä (ja Moskovastakin! Stalin oli takuulla hermona!) itään laskee Volga Volga äiti armas mutkan kautta Kaspiaan ex-Stalingradin läpitte. Se on nyt Volgograd. Stalingradin taistelu oli maailmanhistorian verisin. Porukkaa oli paikalla 10x enemmän kuin Tshingis kaanin aikana. Miltähän se näytti avaruudesta? Muurahaisten kähinältä pesäaukolla.
          ellauri249.html on line 108: In a letter Cicero alludes to a number of obscene words, without actually mentioning them. The words which he alludes to but avoids are: cūlus ("arsehole"), mentula ("penis"), cunnus ("cunt"), landīca ("clitoris"), and cōleī ("testicles"). He also objects to words which mean "to fuck", as well as to the Latin word bīnī "two" because for bilingual speakers it sounds like the Greek βινεῖ (bineî) ("he fucks or sodomises", and also to two words for passing wind, vīssiō and pēdō. He does not object to using the word ānus, and says that pēnis, which in his day was obscene, was formerly just a euphemism meaning "tail".
          ellauri249.html on line 110: Verpa is also a basic Latin obscenity for "penis", in particular for a penis with the foreskin retracted due to erection and glans exposed, as in the illustration of the god Mercury below. As a result, it was "not a neutral technical term, but an emotive and highly offensive word", most commonly used in despective or threatening contexts of violent acts against a fellow male or rival rather than mere sex (futūtiō "fucking"). It is found frequently in graffiti of the type verpes (= verpa es) quī istuc legēs ("You're a dick you who read this").
          ellauri249.html on line 119: ("But with his left hand as his girlfriend, he wipes away his muttō's tears.")
          ellauri249.html on line 121: Juvenal, showing his knack for describing grossly obscene matters without using taboo words, writes as follows in one of his satires (9.43-4):
          ellauri249.html on line 128: Another euphemism for the penis was cauda ("tail"), which occurs twice in Horace,[22] and continues today in the French derivative queue ("tail" or "penis"). In one place in his Satires (Serm. 2.7.50) Horace writes:
          ellauri249.html on line 160: ("Shameful indeed to do, but so that I don't burst with this boner,

          ellauri249.html on line 168: never raised itself to the middle of his tunic")
          ellauri249.html on line 200: Tämä on vain kommunistisen historiankirjoituksen sävyttämä osatotuus. Vuoteen 1913 mennessä myös kaivostyöläisellä alkoi olla mahdollisuus sosiaaliseen nousuun. Lukutaitoisten kaivosmiesten määrä oli kasvanut, ja osa heistä omisti jo asuntonsa. Työläisten lapset kävivät koulua, kaupunki alkoi siistiytyä, siellä oli kesäisin ulkoilmakonsertteja, ammattiopistoja, juutalainen koulu ja jeshiva. Kaupunki tarjosi Hruštšoville mahdollisuuden sosiaaliseen nousuun ja hän myös tarttui tilaisuuteen.
          ellauri249.html on line 233: Ukraina oli Venäjän ohella Neuvostoliiton tärkeimpiä osatasavaltoja. Sen väestö, erityisesti intellektuellit, olivat kuitenkin itsenäisyysmielisiä. Ukraina liitettiin sodalla osaksi Neuvostoliittoa, mutta Lenin hyvitteli ukrainalaisia elvyttämällä ukrainan kieltä ja kulttuuria ja antamalla kouluissa luvan opettaa Ukrainan omaa historiaa ja kulttuuriperintöä ja laittamalla puolueen johtoon ukrainalaisia. Stalin halusi lopettaa tämän paapomisen.
          ellauri249.html on line 248: Kiovan ja Harkovan antautumiset olivat Neuvostoliitolle valtava onnettomuus. Harkovan luhistuminen antoi saksalaisille mahdollisuuden edetä kohti Stalingradia ja Kaukasuksen öljykenttiä. Stalin määräsi Hruštšovin palaamaan Moskovaan, missä hän sai kuulla johtajaltaan lukuisia verhottuja uhkauksia. Tilaisuus päättyi kuten aina siihen, että Stalin kaatoi piippunsa tuhkat Hruštšovin kaljuun päähän.
          ellauri249.html on line 267: Mitään Hruštšov ei myöhemmin myöntänyt tai pahoitellut. Hänelle Ukraina oli osa Neuvostoliittoa. Raakuutta hän ei katunut, vaan sitä että ei ollut voittanut sotaa riittävän nopeasti. Jännä miten tää osa historiaa on jo kirjoitettu uudelleen.
          ellauri249.html on line 320: Vakoilulentoskandaalin jälkeen Hruštšov oli aluksi lamaantunut. Sitten seurasi valtava toimintapuuska, josta Hruštšovin poika totesi myöhemmin, että aivan kuin isässä olisi pato murtunut. Indonesiassa hän tutustui paikalliseen erikoisuuteen, durian-hedelmään, joka leikattuna löyhkää kammottavalta. Hän päätti lähettää niitä laatikollisen kaikille halveksimilleen Neuvostoliiton puhemiehistön jäsenille. Turismin ohella hän tapasi Indonesiassa Eisenhowerin salaisesti ja antoi tällekin lastikollisen.
          ellauri249.html on line 360: In 1961, revolutionary philosopher Frantz Fanon commented: "And when Mr. Khrushchev brandishes his shoe at the United Nations and hammers the table with it, no colonized individual, no representative of the underdeveloped countries laughs. For what Mr. Khrushchev is showing the colonized countries who are watching is that he, the missile-wielding muzhik, is treating these wretched capitalists the way they deserve."
          ellauri249.html on line 388: William D. Rubenstein, a respected author and historian, outlines the presence of antisemitism in the English-speaking world in one of his essays with the same title. In the essay, he explains that there are relatively low levels of antisemitism in the English-speaking world, particularly in Britain and the United States, because of the values associated with Protestantism, the rise of capitalism, and the establishment of constitutional governments that protect civil liberties. Rubenstein does not argue that the treatment of Jews was ideal in these countries, rather he argues that there has been less overt antisemitism in the English-speaking world due to political, ideological, and social structures. Essentially, English-speaking nations experienced lower levels of antisemitism because their liberal and market friendly frameworks limited the organized, violent expression of antisemitism. In his essay, Rubinstein tries to contextualize the reduction of the Jewish population that led to a period of reduced antisemitism: "All Jews were expelled from England in 1290, the first time Jews had been expelled en masse from a European country".
          ellauri249.html on line 390: In post-Napoleonic England, when there was a notable absence of Jews, Britain removed bans on "usury and moneylending," and Rubenstein attests that London and Liverpool became economic trading hubs which bolstered England's status as an economic powerhouse. Jews were often associated with being the moneymakers and financial bodies in continental Europe, so it is significant that the English were able to claim responsibility for the country's financial growth and not attribute it to Jews. It is also significant that because Jews were not in the spotlight financially, it took a lot of the anger away from them, and as such, antisemitism was somewhat muted in England. It is said that Jews did not rank among the "economic elite of many British cities" in the 19th century. Again, the significance in this is that British Protestants and non-Jews felt less threatened by Jews because they were not imposing on their prosperity and were not responsible for the economic achievements of their nation.
          ellauri249.html on line 409: Kyseenalaisia sankareita kaiken kaikkiaan, esimtää "bloody eye" Skobelev edellisessä Krimin sodassa. Skobelev returned to Turkestan after the war, and in 1880 and 1881 further distinguished himself by retrieving the disasters inflicted by the Tekke Turkomans: following the Siege of Geoktepe, it was stormed, the general captured the fort. Around 8,000 Turkmen soldiers and civilians, including women and children were slaughtered in a bloodbath in their flight, along with an additional 6,500 who died inside the fortress. The Russians massacre included all Turkmen males in the fortress who had not escaped, but they spared some 5,000 women and children and freed 600 Persian slaves. The defeat at Geok Tepe and the following slaughter broke the Turkmen resistance and decided the fate of Transcaspia, which was annexed to the Russian Empire. The great slaughter proved too much to stomach reducing the Akhal-Tekke country to submission. Skobelev was removed from his command because of the massacre. He was advancing on Ashkhabad and Kalat i-Nadiri when he was disavowed and recalled to Moscow. He was given the command at Minsk. The official reason for his transfer to Europe was to appease European public opinion over the slaughter at Geok Tepe. British Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery assessed Skobelev as the world's "best single commander" between 1870 and 1914 and wrote of his "skilful and inspiring" leadership. Francis Vinton Greene also rated Skobelev highly.
          ellauri249.html on line 472: Its origin is set down in Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia where he records that a shoemaker (sutor) had approached the painter Apelles of Kos to point out a defect in the artist's rendition of a sandal (crepida from Greek krepis), which Apelles duly corrected. Encouraged by this, the shoemaker then began to enlarge on other defects he considered present in the painting, at which point Apelles advised him that ne supra crepidam sutor iudicaret ('a shoemaker should not judge beyond the shoe'), which advice, Pliny observed, had become a proverbial saying. The Renaissance interest in meddling cluelessly into other people's affairs made the expression popular again.
          ellauri249.html on line 474: The saying remains popular in several languages, as in the English "A cobbler should stick to his last", the Dutch Schoenmaker, blijf bij je leest, the Danish Skomager, bliv ved din læst, the German Schuster, bleib bei deinen Leisten, and the Polish Pilnuj, szewcze, kopyta. Other languages use slightly changed forms: the Spanish Zapatero, a tus zapatos ('Shoemaker, [tend] to your shoes'), and the Russian Суди, дружок, не свыше сапога ('Judge not, pal, above the boot'), after Alexander Pushkin's poetic retelling of the legend.
          ellauri249.html on line 476: Karl Marx ridiculed the idea: "'Ne sutor ultra crepidam' – this nec plus ultra of handicraft wisdom became sheer nonsense, from the moment the watchmaker Watt invented the steam-engine, the barber Arkwright the throstle, and the working-jeweller Fulton the steamship."
          ellauri249.html on line 478: The Dunning–Kruger effect is defined as the tendency of people with low ability in a specific area to give overly positive assessments of this ability. The name comes from two singularly dense American psychologists Dunning and Kruger who thought they were the cat's whiskers, though in fact they could not find their own arses with a map.
          ellauri254.html on line 58: Ernst Theodor Amadeus Hoffmann (24. tammikuuta 1776 Königsberg, Itä-Preussi – 25. kesäkuuta 1822 Berliini) oli saksalainen kirjailija, juristi, säveltäjä, musiikkikriitikko, piirtäjä ja karikatyristi. Hoffmann oli Saksan romantiikan huomattavin kertoja ja uudenaikaisen kauhukertomuksen aloittaja. Hoffmann on jäänyt kirjallisuushistoriaan lyhennetyssä muodossaan E. T. A. Hoffmann. Parhaiten Hoffmann tunnetaan teoksestaan Pähkinänsärkijä ja hiirikuningas (Nussknacker und Mausekönig, 1816). Pjotr Tšaikovski sävelsi teoksesta vuonna 1892 tunnetun baletin, joka perustui Alexander Dumas'n versioon Hoffmannin tarinasta. Hoffmannista itsestäänkin on tehty ooppera, Jacques Offenbachin Hoffmanin kertomukset (1879). Jules Barbierin libretto perustuu hänen ja Michel Carrén näytelmään (1851), joka taas perustuu Hoffmanin kertomuksiin, joiden päähenkilönä hän itse seikkailee.
          ellauri254.html on line 67: In den Rahmengesprächen der „Serapionsbrüder“ treten insgesamt sechs Figuren auf. Ihre Identifikation mit den historischen Teilnehmern des Serapions-Kreises ist zum einen Teil spekulativ, zum anderen Teil hat Hoffmann die realen Figuren nur als Anregung für die literarische Charakterisierung genommen.
          ellauri254.html on line 97: Pyhän Athanasioksen tavoin myös pyhä Serapion tunnetaan erityisesti kirjallisista töistään. Häneltä on säilynyt useita kirjoituksia. Näistä merkittävin on liturgisten rukousten kokoelma Eukhologion, joka löydettiin ja julkaistiin 1890-luvulla. Se on merkittävimpiä alkukirkon liturgisia tekstejä. Serapionilta on myös säilynyt teos manikealaisuutta vastaan. Manikealaiset opettivat, että vain sielu on Jumalan luoma mutta ruumis oli lähtöisin pahasta tai suorastaan Paholaisesta. Pyhä Serapion kuitenkin osoitti teoksessaan, että ihmisruumista voidaan käyttää sekä hyvän että pahan välineenä sydämen asenteesta riippuen. Niin sielu kuin ruumiskin ovat siis yhtä lailla Jumalan tekosia. Iloisena Jahve rullasi Aatamille vällykäärmettä hyräillen: This is a cinch.
          ellauri254.html on line 100: Pyhä Serapion nukkui kuolonuneen maanpakolaisuudessa vuoden 360 tienoilla. Monet kirkon suurista pyhistä arvostivat häntä. Pyhän Athanasioksen lisäksi häntä kunnioitti esimerkiksi pyhä Hieronymus (15.6.), joka kutsui Serapionia Tunnustajaksi, koska tämä oli joutunut pakenemaan oikean opin tunnustamisen vuoksi. Roomalaiskatolisessa perinteessä Serapion tunnetaan oppineisuutensa ansiosta myös nimellä Serapion Skolastikko.
          ellauri254.html on line 140: Veniamin Aleksandrovitš Kaverin (ven. Вениами́н Алекса́ндрович Каве́рин, oikea sukunimi Zilber, Зи́льбер; 19. huhtikuuta (J: 6. huhtikuuta) 1902 Pihkova – 2. toukokuuta 1989 Moskova) oli venäläinen neuvostokirjailija. Veniamin Kaverin syntyi sotilasmuusikon perheeseen. Hän opiskeli Pihkovan kymnaasissa, suoritti keskikoulun loppuun Moskovassa ja pääsi vuonna 1919 Moskovan yliopiston historiallis-kielitieteelliseen tiedekuntaan. Vuonna 1920 Kaverin muutti Pietariin, jossa hän jatkoi opintojaan Pietarin yliopiston filosofisessa tiedekunnassa sekä Itämaisten kielten instituutin arabian kielen osastossa.
          ellauri254.html on line 171: Blok opiskeli Pietarin yliopistossa oikeustiedettä, vieraita kieliä ja kirjallisuutta. Opinnot jäivät kuitenkin kesken, kun hän keskittyi runouteen. Blokin varhaistuotantoon vaikutti saksalainen filosofia, muun muassa Schopenhauerin ja Nietzschen ajatukset. Hän vietti lapsuutensa Šakmatonon maatilalla lähellä Moskovaa. Maanmiehistä häneen vaikuttivat eniten uskonnollisen mystikon Vladimir Solovjovin ja myös Fjodor Tjuttševin ja Afanasi Fetin teokset.
          ellauri254.html on line 360: According to the extremely experienced Belgian slavist Emmanuel Waegemans, "who was and still is indeed considered to be the primus inter pares in Russian literature and culture from the eighteenth-century onwards", Russian thinkers themselves contributed largely to this movement: such examples would be the irrationalistic and mystical poetry and philosophy of Fyodor Tyutchev and Vladimir Solovyov or Fyodor Dostoyevsky's novels. It is remotely thinkable that these geeks could read the Western alphabet on their own.
          ellauri254.html on line 369: Considered to be the 'father' (ru. paapa) of Russian Symbolism. In his book On the Causes of the Decline and on the New Trends in Contemporary Russian Literature (1893), just as the AI guru Martin Minsky, he promoted extreme individualism and deified the act of creation. Merezhkovsky was known for his poetry as well as a series of novels on good men, among whom he counted Jesus, Joan of Arc (not a man?), Dante Alighieri, Leonardo da Vinci, Napoleon and (later) Hitler.
          ellauri254.html on line 373: Valeri Bryusov's novel The Fiery Angel is also well known. It tells the story of a 16th-century German scholar and his attempts to win the love of a young woman whose spiritual integrity is seriously undermined by her participation in occult practices and her dealings with unclean forceps. The novel served as the basis for Sergei Prokofiev's eponymous opera The Fiery Angel.
          ellauri254.html on line 377: considered to be one of the most popular poets, who believed in first inspiration and sometimes intentionally left his verse unrevised. In many regards looked upon as the antipode of Valery Bryusov.
          ellauri254.html on line 383: This pessimistic Russian symbolist writer, who referred to himself as the lard of death, was (as I already said) the first writer to introduce the morbid, pessimistic elements characteristic of fin de siècle literature and philosophy into Russian prose. His most famous novel, The Petty Cash Demon (1905), was an attempt to create a living portrait of the concept known in Russian as poshlost' (an idea whose meaning lies somewhere between evil, trashy and banality or kitsch). His next large prose work, A Created Legend (a trilogy consisting of Drops of Blood, Queen Ortruda, and Smoke and Ash), contained many of the same characteristics but presented a considerably more positive and hopeful view of the world. It sold much worse than Petty Cash.
          ellauri254.html on line 385: In 1899, as Fyodor Sologub progressed in the teaching profession while continuing to elaborate his literary career, Sologub was appointed principal of the Andreevskoe municipal school in Saint Petersburg. With the position came an apartment on Vasilievsky Island, which Sologub shared with his sister Olga. In the late 1890s and at the beginning of the 1900s, the art world of Petersburg saw Konstantin Sluchevsky’s ‘Fridays’, and Sergei Diaghilev’s ‘Wednesdays’: literary salons which were attended by the leading poets and artists of the day. Sologub had been a participant of both groups; and between 1905 and 1907, his apartment on Vasilievsky Island became the home of ‘Sundays’, a regular meeting place for Petersburg’s nascent intellectuals.
          ellauri254.html on line 391: In the month after Olga’s death from tuberculosis in June 1907, Sologub retired following twenty-five years as a teacher, and moved in Petersburg from the school-owned apartment to a private flat. The following year he married Anastasia Chebotarevskaya, a translator and author of children’s books who he had first met in the autumn of 1905. In the summer of 1909, Sologub and Chebotarevskaya holidayed in France. Though he had travelled to Finland with his sister in a final attempt to improve her condition, Finland was at the time part of the Russian Empire, so this trip to France was Sologub’s first proper visit abroad.
          ellauri254.html on line 393: In August 1910, Sologub and his wife moved to a larger apartment, at Razyezzhaya ulitsa in the centre of Petersburg. The short and brisk sentences of Anastasia Chebotarevskaya’s writing have been viewed as a potential influence on Sologub’s own work; and she encouraged his acquaintance with the young writers of Russian Futurism, a distinctive literary movement which was then just beginning to flower. Yet the influence of Anastasia on her husband has not been unanimously well received. The humourist Teffi – who was one of the group who frequented the ‘Sundays’ gatherings at Sologub’s Vasilievsky Island home – wrote that Sologub’s marriage:
          ellauri254.html on line 395: ‘reshaped his daily life in a new and unnecessary way. A big new apartment was rented, small gilt chairs were bought. The walls of the large cold office for some reason were decorated with paintings of Leda by various painters. The quiet talks were replaced by noisy gatherings with dances and masks. Sologub shaved his mustache and beard, and everyone started to say that he resembled a Roman of the period of decline.’
          ellauri254.html on line 397: One of these ‘noisy gatherings with dances and masks’ proved the occasion of a notable scandal within the world of Russian letters. On 3 January, 1911, Sologub and his wife hosted a masquerade to celebrate the new year. Among the attendees were the writers Aleksei Remizov and Aleksei Tolstoy. Remizov was well known within the world of Russian letters for his mischievous sense of humour. He founded a ‘Great and Free House of Apes’, declaring himself Chancellor, and sent out missives to writers and publishers decreeing them positions in this ironic organisation; and Andrei Bely dubbed him a ‘petty cash demon’ – the title of Sologub’s most celebrated work – owing to his appearance.
          ellauri254.html on line 399: For the new year’s masquerade, Anastasia lent Remizov an anal hide for use as a costume. Remizov apparently cut the tail from this hide, and attached it to his rear so that it poked out of the front vent of his evening jacket. Anastasia failed to see the funny side, for she had borrowed the hide herself in order to lend it to Remizov. She complained in a letter:
          ellauri254.html on line 405: Fyodor and Anastasia would stay at the apartment on Razyezzhaya ulitsa until 1916, when – after several years of constant touring for the sake of a series of lectures – Sologub settled again and returned with his wife to Vasilievsky Island. The final move of his life would come in the weeks after his wife’s suicide in 1921, upon which Sologub took an apartment on the Zhdanovskaya Embankment, close to Tuchkov bridge from which his wife had jumped and drowned.
          ellauri254.html on line 427: God (Gott) sends Death (Tod) to summon the rich bon viveur Everyman (Jedermann) who is then abandoned by his friends, his wealth and his lover (Buhlschaft).
          ellauri254.html on line 443: Das Fragment scheint sehr dicht Hofmannsthals eigene biographische Situation zu reflektieren. Im Sommer 1901 hatte er geheiratet und mit seiner Frau ein Haus bezogen. Finanziell war er durch das Vermögen seines Vaters unabhängig. Der erste Dialog zwischen Jedermann und dem Mammon lässt das Herrschaftsverhältnis zwischen beiden hervortreten. Jedermann hadert mit dem Mammon, seinem Knecht, dessen Dienstfertigkeit ihm unerträglich ist.
          ellauri254.html on line 455: Stefan Anton George (* 12. Juli 1868 in Büdesheim, heute Stadtteil von Bingen am Rhein; † 4. Dezember 1933 in Locarno) war ein deutscher Lyriker. Zunächst vor allem dem Symbolismus verpflichtet, wandte er sich nach der Jahrhundertwende vom reinen Ästhetizismus der zuvor in den Blättern für die Kunst propagierten „kunst für die kunst“ ab und wurde zum Mittelpunkt des nach ihm benannten, auf eigenen ästhetischen, philosophischen und lebensreformerischen Vorstellungen beruhenden George-Kreises.
          ellauri254.html on line 459: Ab 1882 besuchte er das Ludwig-Georgs-Gymnasium in Darmstadt. Nebenbei lernte er selbstständig Italienisch, Hebräisch, Griechisch, Latein, Dänisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Englisch, Französisch und Norwegisch, um fremde Literaturen im Original lesen zu können. Seine Sprachbegabung veranlasste ihn auch, mehrere Geheimsprachen zu entwickeln. Eine davon behielt er bis zum Ende seines Lebens für persönliche Notizen bei; da jedoch alle entsprechenden Unterlagen nach seinem Tod vernichtet wurden, ist sie bis auf zwei Zeilen in einem Gedicht verloren und diese können auch nicht mehr entschlüsselt werden.
          ellauri254.html on line 461: Nach seinem Abitur im Jahre 1888 bereiste George die europäischen Metropolen London, Paris und Wien. In Wien lernte er 1891 Hugo von Hofmannsthal kennen. In Paris traf er auf den Symbolisten Stéphane Mallarmé und dessen Dichterkreis, der ihn nachhaltig beeinflusste und ihn seine exklusive und elitäre Kunstauffassung des l’art pour l’art entwickeln ließ. Seine Dichtungen sollten sich jeglicher Zweckgebundenheit und Profanierung entziehen. Zu Georges Pariser Kontaktpersonen gehörte auch Paul Verlaine. Unter dem Einfluss der Symbolisten entwickelte George eine Abneigung gegen den in Deutschland zu jener Zeit sehr populären Realismus und Naturalismus. Maxim Gorki wäre sehr böse gewesen, hätte er das gewusst. Seit 1889 studierte er drei Semester lang an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Berlin, brach sein Studium jedoch bald ab. Danach blieb er sein Leben lang ohne festen Wohnsitz, wohnte bei Freunden und Verlegern (wie Georg Bondi in Berlin), auch wenn er sich zunächst noch relativ häufig in das Elternhaus in Bingen zurückzog. Zwar hatte er von seinen Eltern ein beträchtliches Erbe erhalten, doch lebte er stets sehr genügsam. Als Dichter identifizierte er sich früh mit Dante (als der er auch beim Münchner Fasching auftrat), dessen Divina Comedia er in kleine Teile zerriss. Samanlainen ilkeä riippunokka se olikin kuin Dante.
          ellauri254.html on line 490: Außerdem war der thematische Bruch Georges in dessen Privatleben begründet. In jener Zeit hatte er sich vom okkulten Kreis Ludwig Klages’ und Alfred Schulers abgewandt und den Kontakt zu Hugo von Hofmannsthal abgebrochen. Der Wegfall einiger Anhänger und die Nachfolge durch jüngere Dichter sorgten für einen Wandel der Blätter für die Kunst. Die nun teilweise auch anonym veröffentlichten Gedichte rückten ins Metaphysische und behandelten zunehmend apokalyptische, expressionistische und esoterisch-komische Themen. Auch der George-Kreis hatte sich dadurch verändert. War er zuvor eine Vereinigung Gleichgesinnter, wandelte er sich nun zu einem hierarchischen Bund aus Jüngern, die sich um ihren höhergestellten Meister George scharten. Es wird vermutet, dass es im Kreis Stefan Georges seelischen oder gar sexuellen Missbrauch gab.
          ellauri254.html on line 501: Klages was born on 10 December 1872, in Hannover, Germany, the son of Friedrich Ferdinand Louis Klages, a businessman and former military officer, and wife Marie Helene née Kolster. In 1878, his sister Helene Klages was born and the two shared a strong bond throughout their lives. In 1882, when Klages was nine years old, his mother died. The death is thought to have been the result of pneumonia. He quickly developed a strong interest in both prose and poetry writing, as well as in Greek and Germanic antiquity. His relationship with his father was strained by the latter's strictness and will to discipline him. Nevertheless, attempts to forbid Klages from writing poetry were unsuccessful by both his teachers and parents.
          ellauri254.html on line 503: Klages developed an intense childhood friendship with classmate Theodor Lessing, with whom he shared "many passionate interests." Klages fought to maintain their friendship in spite of his father's anti-semitism. According to Lessing, "Ludwig's father did not view his son's fraternization with 'Juden' as acceptable." Klages' childhood friendship with Theodor Lessing came to a bitter end in 1899. Both would later write about the depth of their relationship and influence on each other—though many aspects, such as the effect race had on their friendship, remain unclear.
          ellauri254.html on line 505: In uniting his philosophy and personal preferences, Klages generally opposed sexuality as a formal concept. Mitä vetoa että Ludi oli bi? Even during the heyday of sexual and bohemian rebellion, Herf writes, "Klages struck most observers as strikingly clean and honourable in erotic matters."
          ellauri254.html on line 506: When Klages (at 23) moved into a new Schwabing flat in 1895, he entered into an intense sexual relationship with his landlady's daughter, with the mother's approval; the daughter, whom Klages called 'Putti', was eleven years younger than him (12 yrs), and their relationship continued for almost two decades though remained only sexual in nature, and squeaky clean. During his years in Schwabing, Klages also became romantically involved with novelist Franziska zu Reventlow, which was further alluded to in her 1913 roman à clef Herrn Dames Aufzeichnungen. Both Stefan George and Alfred Schuler, with whom Klages closely associated, were openly homosexual men. Whilst some of Klages' outward statements on homosexuality may be seen as harsh, he maintained an intimate personal and not just academic admiration for Schuler all throughout his life. Kaikki käy, kuhan paikat pysyy kemiallisen puhtaana. Kemia ei tunne likaa.
          ellauri254.html on line 509: In 1914 at the outbreak of war Klages moved to Switzerland and supported himself with his writing and income from lectures. He returned to Germany in the 1920s and in 1932 was awarded the Goethe medal for Art and Science. However, by 1936 he was under attack from Nazi authorities for lack of support and on his 70th birthday in 1942 was denounced by many newspapers in Germany. After the war he was honoured by the new government for his lack of support to the Nazis, particularly on his 80th birthday in 1952.
          ellauri254.html on line 511: Klages influence was widespread and amongst his great admirers were contemporaries like Jewish thinker Walter Benjamin, philosopher Ernst Cassirer, philologist Walter F. Otto and novelist Hermann Hesse.
          ellauri254.html on line 517: In Munich, the Cosmic Circle of Ludwig Klages and Alfred Schuler, deeming "the Jew the enemy of the human race," gave their erstwhile leader, Stefan George, this ultimatum: "What is your stand on Judah?" He replied that he wished he had more such deep-throated Jewish disciples as Wolfskehl. George's views continued to overlap with those of the Cosmic Circle, especially in invoking the pagan earth mother of "Templars." Actually what first launched the George cult on a nationwide basis was Klages's own book, Stefan George, of 1902. The accusation of Klages's Nazism by indignantly pointing out that the Nazis distinctly distanced themselves from Klages. Though the Nazis shared Klages's basic metapolitics and had found him useful for propaganda among professors, they later found the Klages-Schuler cult embarrassing. The intensity of George's break with Klages-Schuler is paralleled by Nietzsche's break with the Jew-hater Richard Wagner; in both cases an intense friendship was severed on the grounds of civilized values higher than friendship. Klages thought that Nazis and Israelis were both wrong in thinking they were the chosen people, with the difference that the Jews had actually already won the beauty contest.
          ellauri254.html on line 519: In seinem Spätwerk Das neue Reich (1928) verkündete George eine hierarchische Gesellschaftsreform auf der Grundlage einer neuen geistig-seelischen Aristokratie (z. B. Stefan George). Georgea ei nazit saaneet houkutelluxi mukaansa, vaan se ryömi Sveiziin kuolemaan. Tän Schwulerin fasistiset sekoilut saivat sen kyllä hetkittäin kuumumaan, varmaan kun pojilla oli housut nilkoissa.
          ellauri254.html on line 521: In Schulers antisemitisch-esoterischer Vorstellungswelt strömten im Blut „kosmische Energien“ des Menschen zusammen, ein kostbarer Besitz, der „Quell aller schöpferischen Mächte“ sei. Dieser Schatz sei von einem besonderen Leuchtstoff durchdrungen, der von der kosmischen Kraft des Trägers künde, allerdings nur im Blut auserwählter Personen zu finden sei. Von ihnen erwartete man in den Zeiten des Niederganges die allgemeine Wiedergeburt in den Sonnenkindern oder Wiener Sängerknaben. Nun gab es nach Auffassung Klages’ einen mächtigen Feind des Blutes, den Geist, und die kosmischen Anstrengungen sollten darauf hinauslaufen, die Seele aus der „Knechtschaft“ dieses Geistes zu befreien, jener Kraft, die mit Fortschritt und Vernunft, Kapitalismus, Zivilisation und dem Judentum gleichzusetzen war und den Sieg Jahwes über das Leben bedeuten würde. Die Tiraden Schulers gegen den „Molochismus“, wie er seine Anspielung auf den kinderverschlingenden Moloch nannte, unterschieden sich kaum von antisemitischen Wendungen, die um diese Zeit in Wien gestreut wurden. Klages ging über diese noch hinaus, indem er vom Scheinleben einer Larve sprach, die Jahwe nutze, „um auf dem Wege der Täuschung die Menschheit zu vernichten“.
          ellauri254.html on line 604: Claude-Henri de Rouvroy, Saint-Simonin kreivi (17. lokakuuta 1760 Pariisi – 19. toukokuuta 1825 Pariisi) oli ranskalainen taloustieteilijä ja filosofi, jota pidetään ranskalaisen sosialismin perustajana. Saint-Simonin mukaan historia on jatkuva prosessi, jossa jokainen aikakausi lopulta muodostuu kehityksen jarruksi, josta on siirryttävä seuraavaan aikakauteen. Kehityksen välttämättömyyden syy on ilmiöiden sisältämissä ristiriidoissa. On suuntauduttava kohti parempaa tulevaisuutta.
          ellauri254.html on line 771: Heti kun Barbussen Le Feu julkaistiin sarjakuvalehtenä, sen luki laaja yleisö, jonka reaktiosta Barbusse oli erittäin kiinnostunut. Kirja oli myös menestys. Ensimmäinen kiista koski sitten romaanin, vuoden 1916 Prix Goncourtin voittajan, historiallista todenperäisyyttä, lähinnä syvän kuilun vuoksi, joka vallizi sensuurin salliman tekstin ja sotapropagandan välillä, joka itse tuomittiin kirjassa. Tekstin poliittiset panokset, erityisesti kommunismi ja pasifistinen sitoutuminen, ovat toinen kiistanalainen aihe kirjassa.
          ellauri254.html on line 803: Lunz was born in Saint Petersburg, the capital of the Russian Empire, into a middle-class Jewish family on May 2, 1901. His father, Natan Yakovlevich, an emigrant from Lithuania, was a pharmacist and seller of scientific instruments. His mother, Anna Efimovna, was an accomplished pianist. As a child, Lev was delicate but very lively; he contracted pneumonia and diphtheria, which may have weakened his heart.
          ellauri254.html on line 805: His worsening health compelled him to seek care in Germany, to which his parents had emigrated early in 1921. He went West for good in 1924, at 23 years of age. Lunz died abroad from heart failure and brain embolism, but he is remembered in The West for his daring defense of creative freedom against Bolshevik Party demands for political commitment. In "Go West Young Man", Lunz spoke like a Cambridge apostle:
          ellauri254.html on line 814: Party spokesman Andrei Zhdanov (1896-1948), formally addressing the Soviet writers in Leningrad, quoted Lunz (as above) and declared: “This is the preaching of rotten apoliticism, philistinism and vulgarity.” Njekulturno, in a word.
          ellauri254.html on line 821: Shklovsky was born in St. Petersburg, Russia. His father was a Lithuanian Jewish mathematician (with ancestors from Shklov) who converted to Russian Orthodoxy and his mother was of German-Russian origin. He attended St. Petersburg University.
          ellauri254.html on line 823: Shklovsky returned to St. Petersburg in early 1918, after the October Revolution. During the Civil War he opposed Bolshevism and took part in an anti-Bolshevik plot organised by members of the Socialist-Revolutionary Party. After the conspiracy was discovered by the Cheka, Shklovsky went into hiding, traveling in Russia and the Ukraine, but was eventually pardoned in 1919 due to his connections with Maxim Gorky, and decided to abstain from political activity. His two brothers were executed by the Soviet regime (one in 1918, the other in 1937) and his sister died from hunger in St. Petersburg in 1919.
          ellauri254.html on line 825: Shklovsky integrated into Soviet society and even took part in the Russian Civil War, serving in the Red Army. However, in 1922, he had to go into hiding once again, as he was threatened with arrest and possible execution for his former political activities, and he fled via Finland to Germany.
          ellauri254.html on line 829: Zamyatin is now considered one of the first Soviet dissidents. He is most famous for his highly influential and widely imitated 1921 dystopian science fiction novel We, which is set in a futuristic police state.
          ellauri254.html on line 831: In 1921, We became the first work banned by the Soviet censorship board. Ultimately, Zamyatin arranged for We to be smuggled to the West for publication. The outrage this sparked within the Party and the Union of Soviet Writers led directly to the State-organized defamation and blacklisting of Zamyatin and his successful request for permission from Joseph Stalin to leave his homeland. In 1937 he died in poverty in Paris. Serve him right!
          ellauri254.html on line 855: Yxityiset vartijat kauhistavat kaikkia mutta ovat tulleet jäädäkseen. Yxityistä terveyttä vartioivat yxityiset pamputtajat ja tukehduttajat. Mamutaxit exyvät ja yxityiset bussit ja taxit myöhästelevät, mamukuskit eivät päästä sisään koiria eivätkä pääse ize nurkan taaxe pissalle.
          ellauri254.html on line 880: Eikä lapset kauhistuneet ruumiita...
          ellauri254.html on line 887: After his forced resignation from active politics in 1989, Tikhonov wrote a letter to Mikhail Gorbachev which stated that he regretted supporting his election to the General Secretaryship. This view was strengthened when the Communist Party was banned in the Soviet Union. After his retirement, he lived the rest of his life in seclusion at his dacha. As one of his friends noted, he lived as "a hermit" and never showed himself in public and that his later life was very difficult as he had no children and because his wife had died. Prior to the dissolution of the Soviet Union Tikhonov worked as a State Advisor to the Supreme Soviet. Tikhonov died on 1 June 1997 and was buried at the Novodevichy Cemetery. Shortly before his death, he wrote a letter addressed to Yeltsin: "I ask you to bury me at public expense, since I have no financial savings."
          ellauri254.html on line 1033: Kuvaillessaan Prahassa ollutta Venäjän silloiselle kirjallisuudelle omistettua esitelmätilaisuutta, jossa oli kehuttu serapioneja kaikesta siitä, mitä olette tehneet, Gorki sanoi, että esitelmöitsijän kimppuun kaikki oikeauskoiset emigrantit hyökkäsivät kuin pedot ja haukkuivat hänet pataluhaksi. Haukkuminen jatkuu vieläkin kaikissa lehdissä... Anteeksiantamaton rikos on puhua jotain hyvää Venäjästä. Hämmästyneenä, miltei kauhistuneena seuraan eilisten 'kulttuuri-ihmisten' rappeutumista. B. Zaitsev sepittelee taitamattomasti pyhimysten elämäkertoja.
          ellauri254.html on line 1075: Nikolai Aleksejevitš Ostrovski (ven. Никола́й Алексе́евич Остро́вский, ukr. Мико́ла Олексі́йович Остро́вський, Mykola Oleksijovytš Ostrovskyi; 29. syyskuuta (J: 16. syyskuuta) 1904 Vilija, Ukraina – 22. joulukuuta 1936 Moskova) oli neuvostoliittolainen realistinen kirjailija. Hänen tunnetuin teoksensa on Venäjän sisällissotaa ja Neuvostoliiton syntyaikoja kuvaava Kuinka teräs karaistui (ven. Как закалялась сталь, 1934). Teos perustui kirjailijan omiin kokemuksiin. Että tällänenkin ukrainalainen, ei taitaisi mennä enää Kievissä kaupaxi. Mullon tää nyt, löytyi kirjaston poistohyllystä SKP:n 40-vuotishistoriikin vierestä. Historiikissa mainittiin Mary Moorhouse Pekkala, uusseelantilainen neljännesmaori, merkittävä naishenkilö sisällissodan karmeiden jälkipyykkien pesussa. Se käytti koko miljoonaomaisuutensa parantamaan keskitysleirivankien oloa, ja joutui sitten vanhana katkeroituneena kansaneläkeläisenä pyytämään SKP:ltä vippejä. Semmosia ne kommunistit ovat, kiittämättömiä. Ja antisemiittejä. Tämä pätkä on Ostrovskin kirjasta:
          ellauri256.html on line 40: history.org/img/r/p/500x600/4194.jpg.webp?v=1617975003" width="100%" />
          ellauri256.html on line 46: Rozanov frequently referred to himself as Fyodor Dostoyevsky's "Underground Man" and proclaimed his right to espouse contrary opinions at the same time. He first attracted attention in the 1890s when he published political sketches in the conservative newspaper Novoye Vremya ("New Time"), owned and run by Aleksey Suvorin. Rozanov's comments, always paradoxical and sparking controversy, led him into clashes with the Tsarist government and with radicals such as Lenin. For example, Rozanov readily passed from criticism of Russian Orthodoxy, and even of what he saw as the Christian preoccupation with death, to fervent praise of Christian faith, from praise of Judaism to unabashed anti-Semitism, and from acceptance of homosexuality as yet another side of human nature to vitriolic accusations that Gogol and some other writers had been latent homosexuals.[citation needed] He proclaimed that politics was "obsolete" because "God doesn't want politics any more," constructed an "apocalypse of our times," and recommended the "healthy instincts" of the Russian people, their longing for authority, and their hostility to modernism.
          ellauri256.html on line 49: Rozanov remains little known outside Russia, though some western scholars have become increasingly fascinated by his work and his persona.
          ellauri256.html on line 56:
          Muodin historia

          ellauri256.html on line 62: Women were the first cultivators of flax and initiated the manufacture of clothing. Evidence for this claim is the oldest depictions of textile production showing women at work, not men, and women continuing in textile production even when the industry was run by males. This is not at all unusual as women were the first brewers in Egypt and, most likely, the first healers who predated the rise of the medical profession. And the first professionals in the entertainment business, see Capitani and Lady Ceepu.
          ellauri256.html on line 246: Boris Nikolaevich Bugaev (Russian: Бори́с Никола́евич Буга́ев, IPA: [bɐˈrʲis nʲɪkɐˈlajɪvʲɪtɕ bʊˈɡajɪf] (listen)), better known by the pen name Andrei Bely or Biely (Russian: Андре́й Бе́лый, IPA: [ɐnˈdrʲej ˈbʲelɨj] (listen); 26 October [O.S. 14 October] 1880 – 8 January 1934), was a Russian novelist, Symbolist poet, theorist and literary critic. He was a committed anthroposophist and follower of Rudolf Steiner. His novel Petersburg (1913/1922) was regarded by Vladimir Nabokov as the third-greatest masterpiece of modernist literature. The Andrei Bely Prize (Russian: Премия Андрея Белого), one of the most important prizes in Russian literature, was named after him. His poems were set to music and performed by Russian singer-songwriters.
          ellauri256.html on line 248: The books of Nietzsche and Dostoevsky had the greatest influence on his life and work.
          ellauri256.html on line 249: Trotsky was very critical of Andrei Bely and his work. Contemporaries often mentioned his “insane” looks.
          ellauri256.html on line 251: Boris Bugaev was born in Moscow, into a prominent intellectual family. His father, Nikolai Bugaev, was a noted mathematician who is regarded as a founder of the Moscow school of mathematics. His mother, Aleksandra Dmitrievna (née Egorova), was not only highly intelligent but a famous society beauty, and the focus of considerable gossip. She was also a pianist, providing Bugaev his musical education at a young age.
          ellauri256.html on line 253: Young Boris grew up at the Arbat, a historical area in Moscow. He was a polymath whose interests included mathematics, biology, chemistry, music, philosophy, and literature. Bugaev attended university at the University of Moscow. He would go on to take part in both the Symbolist movement and the Russian school of neo-Kantianism. Bugaev became friendly with Alexander Blok and his wife; he fell in love with her, which caused tensions between the two poets. One of his notions was the Eternal Feminine, which he equated it with the "world soul" and the "supra-individual ego", the ego shared by all individuals. He supported the Bolshevik rise to power and later dedicated his efforts to Soviet culture, serving on the Organizational Committee of the Union of Soviet Writers.
          ellauri256.html on line 340: Eliskä vähävenäläistä kasakkasukua, ei ihme että sitten petti suuren synnyinmaan asian. When Volodja was 13, his kossack father pricked his finger on a rusty pin while filing papers and died of blood poisoning. Äiti myi irtaimen ja muutti Moskovaan.
          ellauri256.html on line 357: “Some call her the second Beatrice, a wise inspirer, Mayakovsky's kindred spirit. Others, a mercenary witch, a vampire, who attached herself to the troubled genius, to his fame and money, and who drove him to suicide,” present-day biographers write about her. Actually she was a little of both.
          ellauri256.html on line 358: The stormy affair between the legendary “singer of the revolution”, Vladimir Mayakovsky, and a “proponent of depravity”, Lilya Brik, lasted 15 years, until the poet's suicide in 1930. He devoted poems and hundreds of love letters to her. It was probably this affair that most of all contributed to her going down in history, yet it also left her with hundreds of enemies, who tried to erase any trace of her, even from documents. So, who exactly was this femme fatale?
          ellauri256.html on line 362: The girls were under the constant care of a governess. They became fluent in German and French, learned to play the piano and studied at a grammar school. It was there that at the age of 13, Lilya met her future husband, Osip Brik: in the wake of the revolutionary anti-monarchist unrest of 1905, Lilya began to attend political education clubs, one of which was headed by Osip, the son of a jewelry merchant.
          ellauri256.html on line 368: By that time, Vladimir Mayakovsky had been in a relationship with Lilya's younger sister for two years. But having met no resistance in Lilya, he broke up with Elsa, and dedicated the poem A Bulge in Trousers to his new muse.
          ellauri256.html on line 370: The well-off Osip even offered to finance the publication of the poem - he became a kind of a promoter for Mayakovsky. In the meantime, Lilya started working on the poet's image like Pipsa on E. Saarinen: she made him change his brightly-coloured cubo-futuristic robes for a coat and formal suit and have his teeth done. In other words, there were three of them in that relationship.
          ellauri256.html on line 373: Osip was not troubled by his wife's affair. All the more so, since the country was living through a sexual revolution - free love became a symbol of the time. “I loved making love to Osya. On those occasions, we locked Volodya in the kitchen. Then he would rage, trying to join us, scratching at the door and crying,” Lilya once told a friend.
          ellauri256.html on line 376: After the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, the situation turned upside down. Mayakovsky, as a devoted Bolshevik, began to make good money on his poems, whereas Osip Brik's business went pear-shaped. It was then that Lilya told her husband she was now with Mayakovsky, yet she did not want to divorce him. Thus, both moved to the poet’s apartment, lived and traveled at his expense, with Mayakovsky calling Osip a part of the “family”. Their relationship became an “ideal" for those who advocated free love. In the meantime, rumors of Lilya Brik’s numerous sexual liaisons grew.
          ellauri256.html on line 378: Osip did not only let Lilya play around, he also visited brothels with her,” writes Alisa Ganieva, the author of Lilya Brik's biography L.Yu.B. However, Osip had a different interest in prostitutes - he was writing a PhD thesis about them and was something of a “social worker” (giving them legal assistance). However, he took his young wife with him there for fun.
          ellauri256.html on line 384: However, after Mayakovsky shot himself in the heart at the height of his fame, their romance turned into a tragic legend, and Brik was practically declared the poet's killer. Especially after she released their correspondence: there were hundreds of letters with declarations of love from Mayakovsky and terse answers and requests to send money from Lilya.
          ellauri256.html on line 386: Nevertheless, when after Mayakovsky's death his poetry soon began to be forgotten, Lilya, as his executor (named as such by the poet in his will), took a lot of effort to prevent it. She wrote a letter to Joseph Stalin, who issued an order to ensure that the poet's legacy was not forgotten. So it was largely thanks to her that a whole industry was created around Mayakovsky, with his statues erected all over the country, his works reprinted, and collective farms and plants named after him.
          ellauri256.html on line 391: Mayakovsky produced a large and diverse body of work during the course of his career: he wrote poems, wrote and directed plays, appeared in films, edited the art journal LEF, and produced agitprop posters in support of the Communist Party during the Russian Civil War of 1917–1922. Though Mayakovsky's work regularly demonstrated ideological and patriotic support for the ideology of the Bolsheviks and a strong admiration of Vladimir Lenin, his relationship with the Soviet state was always complex and often tumultuous. Mayakovsky often found himself engaged in confrontation with the increasing involvement of the Soviet state in cultural censorship and the development of the State doctrine of Socialist realism. Works that criticized or satirized aspects of the Soviet system, such as the poem "Talking With the Taxman About Poetry" (1926), and the plays The Bedbug (1929) and The Bathhouse (1929), met with scorn from the Soviet state and literary establishment. Majakovskin lehdykkä Lef teki pilkkaa serapioniveljistä. Ei ois kannattanut. Fedin pani sen hampaankoloon ja Zishtshov närkästyi.
          ellauri256.html on line 453: Ja minua vetää kylmässä ja kuumuudessa. Minä kiirehdin, sotkeutuneena ennakoihin ja lainoihin. Kansalainen, huomioikaa lippupassi! - Runous - kaikki! — ratsastus tuntemattomaan. Runous — samaa kuin radiumin louhinta. Gramma saalista, työvuonna. Häiritsevä yksi sana - tuhansia tonneja sanallista malmia. Mutta näiden sanojen kuin tuhkaxi palamisen kirvely sanan lahoamisen rinnalla - raaka-ainetta. Nämä sanat saavat liikkeelle tuhansixi vuosixi miljoonia sydämiä. Tietysti on erilaisia runoilijoita. Monellako runoilijalla on tää käden keveys! Venyttää taikurina säettä suusta izeltään ja muilta. Mitä sanoa lyyrisestä kastraatista?! Vetää ulkomaisen säkeen ja on iloinen. Tämä on normaalia varkautta ja kavallusta niiden jätteiden joukossa, jotka ovat vallanneet maan. Tänään runoja ja oodeja, suosionosoitusten mölyävä möly, menevät historiaan yleiskustannuksina siitä, mitä on tehty meidän toimestamme - kahden tai kolmen. Puudan, kuten sanotaan, pöytäsuolaa syöt ja sata klupipaperossia, saadaxesi kallisarvoisen sanan ongituxi ihmisen arteesisista syvyyxistä.
          ellauri256.html on line 483: Kaniv (ukr. Канів) on kaupunki Keski-Ukrainassa Dneprin oikealla rannalla, noin 150 kilometriä Kiovasta etelään ja noin 50 kilometriä Tšerkasysta luoteeseen, leveän Dnjeprin Järvenpäässä Se kuuluu Tšerkasyn alueeseen ja Tšerkasyn piiriin. Vuonna 2021 siellä oli runsas 23 500 asukasta. Kaniv on historiallinen kaupunki, jonka perusti 1000-luvulla Kiovan suuriruhtinas Jaroslav I Viisas. Nykyään se tunnetaan ennen kaikkea ukrainalaisen runoilijan Taras Ševtšenkon hautapaikkana.
          ellauri256.html on line 503: The most widely accepted modern definition of the "Western World" is based not upon geographical location but upon the cultural (or when appropriate, political or economic) identities of the countries in question. Using this definition, the Western World includes Europe as well as any countries whose cultures are strongly influenced by European values or whose populations include many people descended from European colonists—for example Australia, New Zealand, and most countries in North and South America .
          ellauri256.html on line 518: Boris Sidis (/ˈsaɪdɪs/; October 12, 1867 – October 24, 1923) was a Ukrainian immigrant Jewish psychologist, physician, psychiatrist, and philosopher of education. Sidis studied under William James at Harvard, made 4 degrees, and founded the New York State Psychopathic Institute and the Journal of Abnormal Psychology. He sought to provide insight into why people behave as they do, particularly in cases of a mob frenzy or religious mania. He vigorously applied the principles of Darwinian evolution to the study of psychology. He saw fear as an underlying cause of much human mental suffering and problematic behavior. Boris Sidis opposed mainstream psychology and Sigmund Freud, and thereby died ostracized. Sidis himself derided himself as "silly, pedantic, absurd, and grossly misleading." He later credited his ability to think to his long solitary confinement in Ukraina. Sidis sr died estranged from Sidis jr on October 24, 1923, at the age of 56.
          ellauri256.html on line 521: Sidis sr applied his own psychological approaches to raising William James jr in whom he wished to promote a high intellectual capacity. Sidis jr could read The New York Times at 18 months. By age eight, he had reportedly taught himself eight languages (Latin, Greek, French, Russian, German, Hebrew, Turkish, and Armenian) and invented another, which he called "Vendergood".
          ellauri256.html on line 522: Billy's IQ varied between 200 and 300, depending on who said it. After receiving much publicity for his childhood feats, William James jr came to live an eccentric unillustrious life and died in relative obscurity.
          ellauri256.html on line 524: MIT:n silloinen laskuopin professori ennusti Billystä: I believe he will be a great mathematician, the leader in that science in the future. 11-vuotiaana nenäkäs Billy sai toistuvasti turpiin 5v vanhemmilta Harvardin luokkatovereilta (ml Buckminster Fuller) ja alkoi eristäytyä. Billy vowed to remain celibate and never to marry, as he said women did not appeal to him. Later he developed a strong affection for Martha Foley, one year older than him. Ei siitäkään tullut lasta eikä paskaakaan. Isompana Billy ajoi mieluiten ympäriinsä raitiovaunulla. He obsessively collected streetcar transfers, wrote self-published periodicals, and taught small circles of interested friends his version of American history. Sidis arveli että Euroopassakin oli ollut intiaaneja. Sidis peukutti jonkinlaista dualismia. Sidis died from a cerebral hemorrhage in 1944 in Boston at age 46.
          ellauri256.html on line 528: Before getting married, she (Martha) was a companion of noted former child and prodigy William James Sidis and the object of his unrequited love. Her magazine Story is credited with the first publication and early support of a pantheon of notable authors, including: John Cheever, Carson McCullers, William Saroyan, Truman Capote, Norman Mailer, and such as J. D. Salinger, Tennessee Williams and Richard Wright.
          ellauri257.html on line 47: Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol (1 April [O.S. 20 March] 1809 – 4 March [O.S. 21 February] 1852) was a very short story writer and playwright of Ukrainian origin. Gogol was born in the Ukrainian Cossack town of Sorochyntsi, in the Poltava Governorate of the Russian Empire. His mother was descended from Leonty Kosyarovsky, an officer of the Lubny Regiment in 1710. His father was supposedly Vasily Gogol-Yanovsky, who died when Gogol was 15 years old, was descendant of Ukrainian Cossacks (see Lyzohub family) and belonged to the 'petty gentry'. His father wrote poetry in Ukrainian almost as well as in Russian, and was an amateur playwright in his brother's home theatre. As was typical of the left-bank Ukrainian gentry of the early nineteenth century, the family spoke Ukrainian nearly as well as Russian. As a child, Gogol helped stage plays in his uncle's home theatre.
          ellauri257.html on line 49: His early works, such as Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka, were influenced by his Ukrainian upbringing, Ukrainian culture and folklore, such as red beet soup with pork.
          ellauri257.html on line 50: He was not popular among his schoolmates, who called him a "mysterious dwarf". Very early he developed a dark and secretive disposition, marked by a painful self-consciousness and boundless ambition.
          ellauri257.html on line 51: After a secretive gay life abroad, he spent much time with his old Ukrainian chums, Maksymovych and Osyp Bodiansky.
          ellauri257.html on line 52: He also intensified his relationship with a starets or spiritual elder, Matvey Konstantinovsky, whom he had known biblically for several years. Konstantinovsky seems to have strengthened in Gogol the fear of perdition (damnation) by insisting on the sinfulness of all his imaginative handiwork. Exaggerated ascetic practices with Matvey undermined his health and he fell into a state of deep depression. On the night of 24 February 1852 he burned some of his manuscripts, which contained most of the second part of Dead Souls. He explained this as a mistake, a practical joke played on him by the Devil in the guise of Matvey Konstantinovsky.[citation needed] Soon thereafter, he took to bed, refused all food, and died in great pain nine days later.
          ellauri257.html on line 54: According to serapionist Viktor Shklovsky, Gogol's strange style of writing applies his (Shklovsky's) "ostranenie" technique of defamiliarization.
          ellauri257.html on line 67: Taras Bulba (1962), yhdysvaltalainen sovitus, pääosissa Yul Brynner ja Tony Curtis ja ohjaaja J. Lee Thompson. The tale of a Cossack chief who has sworn to be the eternal enemy of the treacherous Poles. So, when his son falls for a beautiful Pole who has saved his life, the father is faced with the dilemma of whether to kill his own flesh and blood as a traitor. This film reinforced the Brynner stereotype as king of the Asiatic wide open spaces.
          ellauri257.html on line 69: British-born director J. Lee Thompson (“The Yellow Balloon”/”The Passage”/”King Solomon’s Mines”) helms this bloody spectacular. It’s a serviceable large-scale epic that mainly goes wrong with a mushy subplot involving a miscast Tony Curtis as a Cossack wooing a Polish noblewoman, Christine Kaufmann (they were soon to be married in real-life after his divorce from Janet Leigh). It seems to be in genre form when showing hordes of Cossack horsemen flying across the steppes to do battle. It’s based on the novel by Nikolai Gogol and is written without wit or logic by Waldo Salt (former blacklisted writer) and Karl Tunberg.
          ellauri257.html on line 73: The cocky and arrogant Taras raises two sons, Andrei (Tony Curtis) and Ostap (Perry Lopez), and eventually sends them to Kiev University to learn how their enemies think. The independent-minded Andrei falls in love with Natalia (Christine Kaufmann), a young beautiful Polish noblewoman, but her family deems him unworthy of her because of his lowly birth. The heartbroken Andrei returns home to the steppes and his bloodthirsty barbarian warrior father—definitely not a college grad.
          ellauri257.html on line 75: It then turns into a family drama, as Andrei rejects his people to return to Poland and his Princess. The stern dad deals with this betrayal by shooting his son down as a traitor when he tries to raid the Cossack camp for food for his captive Princess, who the Poles threaten to burn at the stake unless Andrei acts.
          ellauri257.html on line 77: Franz Waxman’s bombastic score bursts across the lush Technicolor screen as a reminder of how much Gogol’s novel has been cheapened, Cossacks on horseback engage the Poles in battle giving the film its life pulse and the action-packed film ultimately serves as a paean to Ukrainian nationalism as it rewrites history to leave out how the violently anti-Semitic Cossacks attacked the Jewish population of Poland with a barbaric ruthlessness to dispense with their ethnic cleansing. Yul chews the scenery, but is watchable. Tony demonstrates he can’t act by giving an unbearably gooey performance.
          ellauri257.html on line 85: Buddhalainen huolimattomuus, jolla "Bulba" valmistetaan, poistaa täysin tarpeen analysoida sekä sen suhdetta alkuperäiseen lähteeseen että sen poliittisia aikeita. Tämä ei ole kannanotto aiheesta Venäjän historialliset suhteet Ukrainan kanssa eikä varsinaisesti sanottuna näyttöversio - tämä on, kuten sanotaan, lomaelokuva alunperin venäläisessä käsityksessä lomasta tapahtumana seuraavana aamuna sen jälkeen. jota kaikki häpeävät. Joitakin kalliita maisemia on rakennettu, mutta operaattorilla ei ilmeisesti ole aikaa kuvata niitä.
          ellauri257.html on line 99: Taras Bulba ( venäjäksi : «Тарас Бульба» ; Tarás Búl'ba ) on Nikolai Gogolin (1809-1852) romanttinen historiallinen novelli , joka sijoittuu 1600-luvun ensimmäiselle puoliskolle. Siinä on iäkäs Zaporožian kasakka Taras Bulba ja hänen poikansa Andriy ja Ostap. Pojat opiskelevat Kiovan akatemiassa ja palaavat sitten kotiin, minkä jälkeen kolme miestä lähtivät matkalle Zaporizhian Sichiin (Zaporizshin kasakkojen päämaja, joka sijaitsee Etelä- Ukrainassa ), missä he liittyvät muihin kasakoihin ja lähtevät sotaan Puolaa vastaan.
          ellauri257.html on line 112: Tällä hetkellä kiistanalaisista syistä vuoden 1842 painosta laajennettiin kolmella luvulla ja se sisälsi venäläisiä nationalistisia teemoja. Mahdollisia syitä ovat tarve pysyä linjassa virallisen tsaarin ideologian kanssa sekä kirjailijan muuttuvat poliittiset ja esteettiset näkemykset (jotka ilmenivät myöhemmin teoksessa Dead Souls ja Selected Passages from Correspondence with his Friends ). Muutokset sisälsivät kolme uutta lukua ja uuden lopetuksen (vuoden 1835 painoksessa puolalaiset eivät huomaa polttaa päähenkilöä roviolla).
          ellauri257.html on line 116: Juutalainen Felix Dreizin ja David Guaspari kirjassaan The Russian Soul and the Jew: Essays in Literary Ethnocentrism käsittelevät antisemitismiä ja osoittavat Gogolin kiintymyksen "Venäjän ja Ukrainan kulttuurissa vallitseviin juutalaisvastaisiin ennakkoluuloihin". Léon Poliakovin teoksessa " Antisemitismin historia " kirjoittaja toteaa, että " Taras Bulban "Jankelista" tuli todellakin venäläisen kirjallisuuden arkkityyppinen juutalainen. Gogol maalasi hänet äärimmäisen hyväksikäyttöiseksi, pelkurimaiseksi ja vastenmieliseksi, vaikkakin kykeneväksi olemaan kiitollinen vähästäkin. " Taras Bulbassa on kohtaus jossa juutalaiset heitetään jokeen, kohtaus, jossa Taras Bulba vierailee juutalaisten luona ja pyytää heidän apuaan, sekä kertojan viittaus siihen, että juutalaisia ​​kohdellaan yleisinhimillisesti eli varsin kehnosti.
          ellauri257.html on line 120: Vuosien 1830–1831 marraskuun kansannousun jälkeen Venäjän keisarillista hallintoa vastaan ​​Puolan ydinalueella – jaettu vuodesta 1795 – Puolan kansa joutui tsaarin viranomaisten virallisen syrjintäkampanjan kohteeksi. "Käytännössä koko Venäjän hallitus, byrokratia ja yhteiskunta yhdistyivät yhdeksi purskahdeksi puolalaisia ​​vastaan. Yhteiskuntaan tarttunut fobia antoi uuden voimakkaan sysäyksen Venäjän kansalliselle solidaarisuusliikkeelle" - kirjoitti historioitsija Liudmila Gatagova . Juuri tässä nimenomaisessa kontekstissa monet Venäjän kirjallisista teoksista ja sen ajan suosituista tiedotusvälineistä tulivat vihamielisiksi puolalaisia ​​kohtaan valtion politiikan mukaisesti, varsinkin panslavistisen ideologian ilmaantumisen jälkeensyyttäen heitä "slaavilaisen perheen" pettämisestä. Sosiologin ja historioitsijan prof Vilho Harlen mukaan Taras Bulba , joka julkaistiin vain neljä vuotta kapinan jälkeen, oli osa tätä Puolan vastaista propagandatyötä. Epähuomiossa Gogolin saavutuksesta tuli "Puolan vastainen romaani, jolla on korkeat kirjalliset ansiot, puhumattakaan vähäisemmistä kirjailijoista".
          ellauri257.html on line 133: Vapauduttuaan maaorjuudesta Karl Brjullovin järjestämillä arpajaisilla Ševtšenko opiskeli Pietarin taideakatemiassa, jossa hänen opettajanaan toimi samainen Karl Brjullov. Ševtšenko alkoi myös elättää itseään taidemaalarina ja runoilijana. Vuonna 1840 ilmestyi Ševtšenkon ensimmäinen runokokoelma Kobzar. Vuonna 1841 julkaistiin edelleen eeppinen runo Haidamaky ja vuonna 1844 balladi Hamaliia. Vuosina 1843, 1845 ja 1846 Ševtšenko teki matkoja sukulaistensa luo Ukrainaan, jossa hän sai porsasborshtshia ja vaikutteita ukrainalaisilta kirjailijoilta ja muulta älymystöltä. Ševtšenko tutustui esimerkiksi Panteleimon Kulišiin, Myhailo Maksymovytšiin ja Varvara Repninaan. Ševtšenko valmistui Pietarin taideakatemiasta vuonna 1845, ja kiertäessään samana vuonna Ukrainaa hän kirjoitti runoja, tuhri graffitilla paikallisia historiallisia maamerkkejä ja käänsi museoista kansatieteellistä aineistoa.
          ellauri257.html on line 343: Gombrowicz wrote in Polish, but he did not allow his works to be published in Poland until the authorities lifted the ban on the unabridged version of Dziennik, his diary, in which he described their attacks on him. No tästä arvaa jo mixi sille oltiin tuppaamassa dynypötköä. Mikä pahinta, Gombrowicz´s work has links with existentialism and structuralism. Sen hengenheimolaisia olivat sellaiset lurjuxet kuin Foucault, Barthes, Deleuze, Lacan, and Sartre.
          ellauri257.html on line 346: Kosmos is Gombrowicz´s most complex and ambiguous work. In it he portrays how human beings create a vision of the world, what forces, symbolic order and passion take part in this process and how the novel form organises itself in the process of creating sense. Njoopa joo.
          ellauri257.html on line 388: No. I dislike Jordan Peterson because I find his arguments on many subjects uninformed and riven with factually incorrect assumptions.
          ellauri257.html on line 389: My main beef with Peterson is not with his overall philosophy, although I don’t personally vibe with his “life is suffering” Christian stoicism at all, what I find objectionable is his complete laziness and lack of rigour in political theory.
          ellauri257.html on line 395: İn fact, his “debate” with Slavoj Zizek is wonderfully illustrative of this. When confronted with an actual, living “cultural Marxist”, what resulted was a mostly friendly chat. (No tietysti, ei korppi toisen julkkiskorpin silmää noki paizi selän takana.)
          ellauri257.html on line 396: Peterson is playing unforgivably to a militant alt-right audience that has claimed him as their “red pill guru”. He may not want this but he is feeding that narrative.
          ellauri257.html on line 419: Upon the 2009 American release (of the book, after the film of course, this is America), Michael Dirda wrote in The Washington Post that Pornografia "seems as sick, as pathologically creepy a novel as one is ever likely to read. In some ways, it resembles a rather more polymorphously perverse version of Les Liaisons Dangereuses or one of those disturbing fictions by European intellectuals that blend the philosophical with the erotic: Think of Georges Bataille's The Story of the Eye or Pierre Klossowski's Roberte Ce Soir. ... Through its sado-masochistic material and its almost Henry Jamesian analyses of human motives, Pornografia underscores Gombrowicz's lifelong philosophical obsession: the quest for authenticity." Dirda continued: "Certainly, most readers will find Pornografia perturbing, or worse: repulsive, confusing, ugly. As Milosz once said of Gombrowicz: 'He had no reverence whatsoever for literature. He derided it as a snobbish ritual, and if he practiced it, he attempted to get rid of all its accepted rules.'"
          ellauri257.html on line 452: A Russian wife turned to her husband and asked, "What's this special military operation our glorious leader keeps talking about?" Her husband replied, "It's a war to stop America and NATO." "Oh, right” she says “How's it going?"
          ellauri257.html on line 458: “They haven’t turned up yet. They just send a lot of money and weapons and let the Ukrainians supply the manpower and fill the body bags. Fewer Western casualties this way. The concept has been tested in countless local wars all round the globe."
          ellauri257.html on line 484: Hra suhisi hiljaa Elialle korvaan Jumalan koko suuren suunnitelman myrskyttyään, järistyään ja tultuaan ensin äänekkäästi.
          ellauri257.html on line 489: Singer described himself as "conservative," adding that "I don't believe by flattering the masses all the time we really achieve much." His conservative side was most apparent in his Yiddish writing and journalism, where he was openly hostile to Marxist sociopolitical agendas. In Forverts he once wrote, "It may seem like terrible apikorses [heresy], but conservative governments in America, England, France, have handled Jews no worse than liberal governments.... The Jew's worst enemies were always those elements that the modern Jew convinced himself (really hypnotized himself) were his friends. Interestingly enough, he notes the cultural tensions between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jewish people during his trip to Haifa and during his stay in the new nation. With the description of Jewish immigration camps in the new land, he foresaw the difficulties and socio-economic tensions in Israel, and hence turned back to his critical views of Zionism. Naah, America is the promised land.
          ellauri257.html on line 501: Alma and Isaac: The famed writer always returned to his wife, Alma, despite his well-documented betrayals.
          ellauri257.html on line 502: Who could live with Isaac Bashevis Singer? The sexual escapades of the most successful Yiddish writer in America — and the one whom most Yiddish literati loved to hate — were public knowledge, in large part because he himself built his reputation as a Casanova in his own fiction, where he was chased into the bedroom by women young and old. His oeuvre might be described as “sex and the shtetl.”
          ellauri257.html on line 504: Still, Singer was a married man, but not to Runia (Rachel) Pontsch, who in 1929 gave birth to a son, Israel Zamir, Singer's only child. In Warsaw, before immigrating to the United States, he had a child out of wedlock with one of his mistresses, Runia Shapira, a rabbi’s daughter. She was a Communist expelled from the Soviet Union for her Zionist sympathies. In his 1995 memoir, “A Journey to My Father, Isaac Bashevis Singer,” Zamir recounts how he and his mother ended up in Palestine. But since Singer and Runia separated when Zamir (born in 1929) was little, the report is almost totally deprived of a domestic portrait.
          ellauri257.html on line 506: In the United States, Singer went through a period of depression in which he published little fiction, until in 1938, he met Alma Wasserman and the two married in 1940. For Singer as homo domesticus, I needed the views of his wife, Alma Haimann, whom I’ll refer to by her first name hereafter. I had read in a 1970s article from The Jewish Exponent that Alma had been at work on an autobiography. “I’m about as far as the first 100 pages,” she told the Philadelphia newspaper. I was also aware, from Paul Kresh’s 1979 biography, “The Magician of West 86th Street,” that Singer didn’t think his wife would ever finish the manuscript. But was there such a manuscript?
          ellauri257.html on line 510: The material is unformed, the style is clumsy; the scenes are poorly narrated. Of course, it is unfair to depict Alma as a failed writer, for she never aspired to be a writer. Neither is this manuscript a finished product. Yet Alma on occasion did present herself as an author. She wrote at least one short story, which she sent out to magazines. An editor gave her an encouraging response, but asked her to change the ending. Alma never followed up, and dropped the endeavor altogether.
          ellauri257.html on line 512: She and Singer met in the Catskills, at a farm village named Mountaindale. Although in the manuscript, Alma is elusive about dates, it is known that the encounter took place in 1937. The two were refugees of what Singer’s older brother, Israel Joshua, by then already the successful novelist I.J. Singer, would soon describe as “a world that is no more.” And the two were married to other spouses. Alma and her husband, Walter Wasserman, along with their two children, Klaus and Inga, had escaped from Germany the previous year and come to America, settling in the Inwood section of Manhattan. As for Isaac — as Alma always called him — he arrived in 1935. She portrays their encounters as romantic, although she appears to have been perfectly aware of his reputation.
          ellauri257.html on line 517: , she worked at Saks 34th Street, and then, until retirement, at Lord & Taylor. On occasion she would accompany Singer to his lectures. They also traveled together to Europe, especially England and France. The purpose of one of those trips was for Alma to show Singer the places in Switzerland where she and her parents had stayed before the war. When she returned to America, she felt ecstatic. In the manuscript, she recollects standing on Broadway, looking in wonder at a fruit store and grocery, admiring their abundance.
          ellauri257.html on line 520: What kind of inner, private life did Alma have? Did she tire of years of cooking, cleaning, ironing and sewing for Singer? Was it difficult to be the wife of a public person? How did she cope with his escapades? About these the manuscript remains silent. After all, Alma belonged to a social class where women weren’t encouraged to explore such details. In an interview, she does represent the younger Singer as easy-going and says how much he changed over time. But she ascribes those changes to how much people wanted from him and not the other way around.
          ellauri257.html on line 522: Sadly, nothing in Alma’s narrative hints at the emotional turmoil Singer left in his wake, although in the 1970s she told Kresh that abandoning the Wasserman family left such a sour taste in her mouth that she convinced herself it was better to stay forever with Singer despite his infidelities than to cause another emotional uproar. By most accounts, the lingering effects of her divorce made for bad blood toward Singer among Alma’s children and their extended family.
          ellauri257.html on line 526: Singer’s domestic side is thorny. The Singers kept a Hispanic maid, and Dvora Menashe (later Telushkin), who was Singer’s assistant in his late years — indeed she wrote a memoir, “Master of Dreams” [1997], recounting that time — told me about her. So did Janet Hadda, who wrote the biography “Isaac Bashevis Singer: A Life” (1997). Hadda even provided me with an address, but my letters went unanswered. Lester Goran, who co-taught with Singer at the University of Miami and wrote a memoir about their friendship, “The Bright Streets of Surfside” (1994), couldn’t help me, either.
          ellauri257.html on line 528: Singer continued to write and translate his stories and novels throughout the 1980s, until the onset of dementia in 1987. In the end, as Singer suffered from dementia, his relationships with Goran, Menashe and perhaps even Alma soured. The effects lingered unpleasantly even after his death, and as a consequence it’s hard to track the sirvienta. We don’t even know her name or nationality for certain. The idea of a Spanish-speaking maid as an integral part of Singer’s household is ripe not only for biographical scrutiny, but also for fictional development: !Ah! !Ah! !Si! !Si! !Si señor! !!Mas rapido! !Mas profundo!
          ellauri257.html on line 530: All this to say that the Yiddish writer’s other women — not the sexy but the stolid, those who accompanied him at home for better or worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health — are crucial to the understanding of how he looked at the world. Alma was his anchor. Despite his betrayals, he always returned to her. Her silence, her resignation, might be disheartening to modern sensibilities. Yet she grounded him, and not only as an artist.
          ellauri257.html on line 565: 1889 Lodge havaitsi, että kahden metallipallon väliin syntyi vetovoimaa, jos lähistöllä tapahtui sähköpurkaus. Periaate oli sama, kuin Branlyn kokeissa metallijauheen kanssa. Havainnon pohjalta sekä Branly että Lodge kehittivät laitetta, jolla voisi havainnoida sähkömagneettista säteilyä. Lodge antoi laitteelle nimen kohereeri ja se oli seuraavat viisitoista vuotta perustana kaikille radiokokeiluille.
          ellauri257.html on line 571: Lodge was a Christian Spiritualist. In 1909, he published the book Survival of Man which expressed his belief that life after death had been demonstrated by mediumship. His most controversial book was Raymond or Life and Death (1916). The book documented the séances that he and his wife had attended with the medium Gladys Osborne Leonard. Lodge was convinced that his son Raymond who had become cannon food had communicated with him and the book is a description of his son's experiences in the spirit world. According to the book Raymond had reported that those who had died were still the same people that they had been on earth before they "passed over". There were houses, trees and flowers in the Spirit world, which was similar to the earthly realm, although there was no STD. The book also claimed that soldiers who died in World War I smoked cigars and drank whisky and ate pussy also in the spirit world and because of such statements the book was criticised.
          ellauri257.html on line 673: Jos elämällä – jonka kaipuu on olemuksemme ydin – olisi mitään positiivista sisäistä arvoa, tylsyyttä ei olisi ollenkaan: pelkkä oleminen tyydyttäisi meidät itsessään, eikä meidän tartteis kaipaa mitään. Ich bin nur. Sakemannille se on kauhistus.
          ellauri258.html on line 70: Ymmärrän, ettei Brian De Palman Carrien (1976) tai Stanley Kubrickin Hohdon (1980) kaltaisia elokuvahistorian mestariteoksia synny helposti. Mutta luulisi, että keskinkertainenkin filmimaakari saisi Kingin teksteistä mutkatonta, toimivaa kauhuviihdettä. Kuten vaikka Tulessa syntynyt (Firestarter, 1980) -romaanista, jossa aineksia olisi: tyttären ja isän pakomatka halki Amerikan, telepaattisia voimia, häijyjä pahiksia.
          ellauri258.html on line 144: "Olen kotoisin Pohjois-Haagasta. Hyvin köyhissä oloissa kasvanut mummoni lähti 16-vuotiaana piiaksi ja elätti itsensä myöhemmin siivoojana. Hän halusi antaa lapsilleen ja lapsenlapsilleen paremmat lähtökohdat kuin itselleen, ja antoi. Vanhempani eivät päätyneet akateemiselle uralle, vaikka isäni oli sukumme ensimmäinen korkeakoulututkinnon suorittaja. Mä olen ensimmäinen akateeminen ihminen."
          ellauri258.html on line 288: Ei Klassikko siis mikään huippuhyvä ole, mutta puoltaa paikkaansa Hotakaisen laajassa tuotannossa. Se myös ennakoi muutamia myöhempiä Hotakaisen kirjojen teemoja, kuten äärimmäisen ikävystyttäviä miehisyyttä ja yhteiskuntaa pyörittäviä rakenteita. Jännittävästi Hotakainen näkee jo 1990-luvun loppupuolen nousukausi-Suomessa kasvualustan orastavalle oikeistopopulismille, ja juuri niissä ryhmissä, jotka sitten aika­naan aktivoituivatkin. Kannattaa lukea! Oikeistopopulismin klassikko!
          ellauri258.html on line 303: Syvä katolinen usko, kiintymys monarkiaan ja kiihkeä antikommunismi teki Guareschista yhden Italian kommunistisen puolueen kiihkeimmistä ja vakuuttuneimmista arvostelijoista. Hänen sarjakuvansa nimeltä "Sokea, nopea, ehdoton tottelevaisuus" ovat hyvin kuuluisia, joissa hän pilkkasi kommunistisia militantteja, jotka hän määritteli kolminenänreikäisixi (kazo alla), jotka omaksuivat kirjaimellisesti ylhäältä tulleet käskyt selkeistä painovirheistä huolimatta ja korjasivat sitten lauseet kuten läpässä "Vastakäsky toverit!".
          ellauri258.html on line 348: teorian ja historian suurimman asiantuntijan V. Ya. Proppin mukaan Baba
          ellauri258.html on line 524: Sana baba merkitsee useimmissa slaavilaisissa kielissä vanhempaa tai naimisissa olevaa alempiin sosiaaliluokkiin kuuluvaa naishenkilöä eli akkaa. Paizi Walt Disneyn "Luotathan?" Aladdinissa, jossa Ali Baban luolan pahis oli Baba Jagan näköinen miehimys.
          ellauri258.html on line 544: Joissakin tarinoissa Baba Yaga esiintyy triona sisaruksina, joilla kaikilla on sama nimi. Tää on tuttua Macbethistä. Hän astui sisään ja löysi Baba Yagan luujalkaisen. "Hei, fie", hiän sanoi, "venäläisestä hajusta ei täällä ole ennen kuultu eikä nähty, mutta nyze kyllä tuntuu nenässä. Oletko täällä vapaasta tahdosta vai pakosta, hyvä nuoruuteni?" "Paljon omasta tahdostani ja kaksi kertaa niin paljon pakosta! Kolmas ja nuorin Baba Yaga kommentoi "venäläisestä hajusta" ennen kuin juoksee hakemaan hampaitaan ja syö Ivanin. Ivan pyytää hiäntä antamaan hänelle alakautta kolme sarvea, ja hiän tekee niin. Ensimmäisen hän puhaltaa pehmeästi, toisen kovemmin ja kolmannen vielä kovemmin.
          ellauri258.html on line 783: Oikea vastaus: ELKÄÄ ANTAKO! Ikinä yhtään siimaa, millekään sosiaalivirkalijoille… Täällä ihan aikuisten oikeasti, ei uskota vieläkään sanojani eikä todisteitani. Neljäs piiri ja kolme käynyt täällä toteamassa kaiken olevan kunnossa ja vaan pietään valheellisesta/vääristelevästä huostaanottohakemusehdotuksesta kiinni, kovasti nämä yrittää asiakassuunnitelmaa vääntää miule ja sanoivat että voinko heille lähettää videon, nauroin kovaan ääneen että voi jumalauta. Pidättekö? Mitenkin? Tyhmänä minua, se on todistusaineistoa joka osoittaa teidän ahistelun/häirinnän joka taas aika varmasti kumoaa teidän ehdotuksen lopulta..
          ellauri260.html on line 71: Kuuluja personalisteja: Jacques Maritain, joku jenkki Bowne and his first followers and the European personalist Emmanuel Mounier. Takarivissä seisoo enkelitohtori ja punkkitohtorin idolit Heidegger ja Sartre. Katolisia personalisteja olivat Jacques Maritain, Yves Simon, Étienne Gilson, Robert Spaemann, and Karol Wojtyła, eli se puolalainen paavi John Paul kakkoineen.
          ellauri260.html on line 72: Ize asiassa personalism has nearly always been united to Biblical theism. Joku Von Balthasar suggests that “Without the biblical background personalism is inconceivable.” Mitä vittua, mihis se Bobrowin venäläinen personalismi unohtui?
          ellauri260.html on line 95: Hegel oli sitten taas iso impersonalistipahis. Nuorten hegeliläisten kautta tämä persoonaton idealismin muoto muuttui pian yhtä persoonattomiksi materialismin muodoiksi, jotka huipentuivat marxilaisuuteen, joka pitää ihmisen olemusta todella kollektiivisena; persoonaton determinismi kommunismin muodossa määritteli ratkaisevasti kahdennenkymmenennen vuosisadan poliittisen totalitarismin. Muissa ajattelijoissa idealismilla oli taipumus sulautua yhä naturalistisempiin natsismin ja rasismin muotoihin, mikä synnytti kahdennenkymmenennellä vuosisadalla muita uusia poliittisia liikkeitä, jotka nostivat vaihtoehtoiset kollektiivit henkilön yläpuolelle, kuten kansallissosialismi ja fasismi.
          ellauri260.html on line 103: Seuraava pahis oli Kalle-Aku Comte. Auguste Comten (1798–1857) filosofinen positivismi vahvisti historiallisena lakina, että jokainen tiede (ja itse ihmiskunta) kulkee kolmen peräkkäisen vaiheen, teologisen, metafyysisen ja positiivisen, läpi, joista jokainen on parempi kuin viimeinen.
          ellauri260.html on line 111: Karol Wojtyła luonnehti individualismin ja kollektivismin kahta ääripäätä seuraavalla tavalla: "Toisaalta ihmiset voivat helposti asettaa oman yksilöllisen etunsa kollektiivisuuden yhteisen edun yläpuolelle yrittäen alistaa kollektiivisuuden itselleen ja käyttää sitä yksilölliseen hyvään. Tämä on individualismin virhe, joka synnytti liberalismin nykyhistoriassa ja kapitalismin taloustieteessä. Toisaalta yhteiskunta, pyrkiessään kokonaisuuden väitettyyn hyvään, voi yrittää alistaa henkilöt itselleen siten, että ihmisten todellinen hyvä suljetaan pois ja he itse joutuvat kollektiivin saaliiksi. Tämä on totalitarismin virhe, joka nykyaikana on kantanut pahimman mahdollisen hedelmän."
          ellauri260.html on line 153: Mukavampia yhtäläisyyksiä löytyy kuitenkin Vedantasta. Vishishtadvaita (pätevä ei-dualismi) -koulu kääntyi Advaitan radikaalia ei-dualismia vastaan ja vaati paitsi sitä, mitä tämän koulun ja myöhempien koulujen edustajien englanninkielisissä teoksissa, jotka ovat samalla tavalla kriittisiä advaitaa kohtaan, kutsutaan usein nimenomaisesti henkilökohtaiseksi käsitykseksi brahmanista tai absoluuttisesta, mutta myös henkilökohtaisesta ymmärryksestä yksittäisistä olennoista, jotka on suunniteltu fragmentaarisiksi itseksi (jivatmas), jotka ovat "osia" - samalla yksi ja erilliset muutokset - Brahmanista. Koska intialaisen ajattelun erilaiset klassiset darshanat eivät ole täysin eristettyjä ja saavat vaikutteita toisiltaan, Samkhya -ajattelun elementtejä otetaan myös henkilökohtaiseen Vedantaan, samoin kuin joogan ja perinteisen hindulaisen pyhien kirjoitusten perinnön elementtejä. Juuri pysyvän itsensä, atmanin, opetuksen selkeys, perinteinen ensisijaisuus ja perusluonne Vedantassa ja etenkin advaitaa kritisoivissa kouluissa tekevät tästä personalismista kivemmän kuin puggalavadanin buddhalaisuudessa. Valitettavasti vaan näiltä hinduilta puuttuu tää ruumiin ylösnousemus.
          ellauri260.html on line 165: Aristoteles oli määritellyt ihmisen rationaaliseksi eläimeksi (ho anthropos zoon noetikon) (Aristoteles, hist. I, 1: 488a7; Nichomachean etiikka I, 5: 1097b11; VIII, 12: 1162a16; IX, 9: 1169b18; Politiikka, I, 2: 1253a3). Huomattava parannus verrattuna Sokraateen kynittyyn kanaan. Personalistit, hyväksyessään tämän määritelmän, sikäli kuin se menee, näkevät tällaisen rakenteen ihmisen tuomittavana vähennyksenä objektiiviseen maailmaan.
          ellauri260.html on line 171: Regardless of how, more precisely, animals are to be understood, the person differs from even the most advanced among them by a specific kind of inner self, an inner life, which, ideally, revolves around his pursuit of truth and goodness, and generates person-specific theoretical and moral questions and concerns.
          ellauri260.html on line 177: En philosophie, parler d'être humain, en lieu et place du terme générique d'« homme », c'est emprunter la voie qui tente de répondre à « la question centrale en toute anthropologie telle qu'elle a été formulée par Emmanuel Kant, dans le sens où il se la posait, « Qu'est-ce que l'homme ? » « Was ist der Mensch? « Ach, Mensch, sanoivat saxalaiset turistit kun Aavasaxalla juhannuxena satoi lunta. Heidegger écrivait die Geschichte des Seins (la histoire des seins). Aber er war ein Naziteufel. Dans l'esprit de la philosophie kantienne, l'homme doit être vu comme une fin en soi et non comme un moyen, comme les autres animaux. Jacques Maritain a été avant tout un immense philosophe catholique, l'un de ceux qui a le plus contribué à faire revivre saint Thomas d'Aquin et son cheval.
          ellauri260.html on line 191: The Nobel Prize in Literature 1908 was awarded to Rudolf Christoph Eucken "in recognition of his earnest search for truth, his penetrating power of thought, his wide range of vision, and the warmth and strength in presentation with which in his numerous works he has vindicated and developed an idealistic philosophy of life".
          ellauri260.html on line 195: Se oli varmaan toi lämpimyys josta nobelpisteet tulivat. Rudi oli kuin vasta ofenista tullut vehnäsämpylä, jollaisia kävin aamuvarahin Walter Schnellerin johdolla ostamassa Munichissa lähikaupasta. Lämpimiä idealisteja ei ole pilvin pimein, ne ovat enimmäkseen suht kylmiöitä.
          ellauri260.html on line 201: Eucken syntyi 5. tammikuuta 1846 Aurichissa, sittemmin Hannoverin kuningaskunnassa (nykyinen Ala-Saksi). Hänen isänsä Ammo Becker Eucken (1792–1851) kuoli hänen ollessaan lapsi, ja hänen äitinsä Ida Maria (1814–1872, os Gittermann) kasvatti hänet. Hän sai koulutuksensa Aurichissa, jossa yksi hänen opettajistaan ​​oli klassinen filologi ja filosofi, suomenruozin oikeakielisyyden isä Ludwig Wilhelm Maximilian (Mikael) Reuter (1803–1881). Hän opiskeli Göttingenin yliopistossa (1863–66), jossa Hermann Lotze oli yksi hänen opettajistaan, ja Berliinin yliopistossa. Jälkimmäisessä paikassa Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg oli professori, jonka kyseenalaiset eettiset ja eroottiset taipumukset ja filosofian historiallinen käsittely houkuttelivat häntä suuresti. Göttingen vaikutti tuppukylältä kun öizimme siellä matkalla Dresdeniin ja Puolan uuneille. Olis pitänyt yöpyä Erfurtissa, joka on isompi ja jossa Kautsky viilasi Erfurtin programmia. Engels oli tyytymätön Erfurtin programmiin, ja nuiji siitä Kautskya. Minnekäs se vallankumous unohtui? Ja miten niin uskonto on jokaisen oma asia? Sehän on oopiumia!
          ellauri260.html on line 205: Eucken väitteli klassisen filologian ja antiikin historian tohtoriksi Göttingenin yliopistossa vuonna 1866 väitöskirjalla De Aristotelis dicendi ratione. Hänen mielensä suuntautui kuitenkin ehdottomasti teologian filosofiseen puoleen. Vuonna 1871, työskenneltyään viiden vuoden maaseutukierroxen opettajana Husumissa, Berliinissä ja Frankfurtissa, hänet nimitettiin filosofian professoriksi Baselin yliopistoon Sveitsiin toisen entisen opettajansa seuraajaksi Göttingenissä, heteronormaalin Gustav Teichmüllerin, ja päihitti Teichmüller-bändärin Friedrich Nietzschen kilpailussa asemasta. Hahaa mursuwiixi Atman-koirinesi, jäit kakkosexi mitättömälle partapozolle!
          ellauri260.html on line 207: Gustav Teichmüller (November 19, 1832 – May 22, 1888) is considered a philosopher of the idealist school and a founder of Russian personalism. His ideas were shaped by his teachers Lotze and J. F. Herbart, who in turn were influenced by G. W. von Leibniz. Some scholars describe Teichmüller's personalism as a version of neo-Leibnizianism. His doctrines have also been referred to as constituting a variant of Christian personalism that is in opposition to both positivism and evolutionism as well as traditional Platonism. Teichmüller's philosophy has influenced Nietzsche and this link has been explored by scholars such as Hermann Nohl, who traced Teichmüller's Die wirkliche und die scheinbare Welt, 1882, as the source of the latter's perspectivism. Teichmüller also influenced the Russian thinkers A. A. Kozlov, I.F. Oze, and E. A. Bobrov. Teichmüller nai virolaisen maanomistajan tyttären ja tapettuaan sen 20-vuotiaana lapsivuoteeseen, sen siskon, ja kuoli lopulta ize Tartossa pyylevänä patruunana.
          ellauri260.html on line 213: Hän väitti (vastoin varhaisbuddhismin ja bolshevismin anatman-kantoja) että ihmisillä on sielu ja että he ovat siksi luonnon ja hengen risteyksessä. Hän uskoi, että ihmisten pitäisi voittaa ei-hengellinen luontonsa jatkuvasti pyrkimällä tuhoamaan hengetöntä luontoa, toinen hänen eettisen aktiivisuutensa ja elämän tarkoituksensa (EFK) näkökohta.
          ellauri260.html on line 221:
          The history of the problem

          ellauri260.html on line 223: Rudin tiivistetty maailmanhistoria teoxen Socialism: an analysis alussa on lepertelevästä tyylistään huolimatta pääpiirteissään oikea. 1700-luvulla alkoi teollinen vallankumous jonka siivellä tuli humanismi ja tiedeuskovaisuus ja porvarillinen vallankumous. Kaikki muut vallankumouxet on menneet ennen pitkää perseelleen, mutta kökkäreitä ei mikään näytä pysäyttävän. "Man," says Herder, " has no nobler word to apply to himself than what he himself is: Termitaffe." Rudin kirjan anglosaxinsi Joe McCabe, brittien Timo Airaxinen, ateisti skeptikko ja izeoikeutettu eetikko, mutta silti punastumaton porvari. Timo on tosin Joosea selkeästi läskimpi.
          ellauri260.html on line 225: Joseph Martin McCabe (12 November 1867 – 10 January 1955) was an English writer and speaker on freethought (vapaa-ajattelija), after having been a Roman Catholic priest earlier in his life. He was "one of the great mouthpieces of freethought in England". Becoming a critic of the Catholic Church, McCabe joined groups such as the Rationalist Association and the National Secular Society. He criticised Christianity from a rationalist perspective, but also was involved in the South Place Ethical Society which grew out of dissenting Protestantism and was a precursor of modern secular humanism. William Ferguson wrote of him: "He was bitterly anti-Catholic but also actively undermined religious faith in general." McCabe was also an advocate of women's rights and worked with Mrs. Pankhurst and Mrs. Wolstenholme-Elmy on speeches favoring giving British women the right to vote. McCabe is also known for his inclusion in, and irritation at, G. K. Chesterton's funny book Heretics. Funny is the opposite of not funny, nothing else, defended Chesterton. He should know. In 1920 McCabe publicly debated the Spiritualist Arthur Conan Doyle on the claims of Spiritualism at Queen's Hall in London. Various scientists such as William Crookes and Cesare Lombroso had been duped into believing Spiritualism by mediumship tricks.
          ellauri260.html on line 227: But now let us return to the problem! "Vapauden ongelma", no less! The problem of the hard struggle for life. The first improvement that individuals obtained in this regard was when they came together in social groups, or teams. They now had some protection against both the terrors of nature and the menace of their enemies, other moneky teams. It was religions which first inspired them with a sense of task and duty ; and gradually religion and morality, especially morality in its social aspect, entered into close combination and completed each other.
          ellauri260.html on line 231: German philosophy did a great deal by way of deepening the ideas of men. In particular its starting from the whole instead of the individual, and its idea of movement advancing in virtue of its own forces, had a great influence on every section of social life. But the economic problem, and on this account the general social movement was directed by Lassalle, and still more by Marx, into far too narrow a path, and the Socialist ideal was conceived in too partisan a sense. The chief aim was to bring about a collective ownership of the means of production and " socialise " all property, and to recognise in the class-war a lever for the over- throw of the existing political conditions. It was thus that the Socialist movement captured the thoughts and sentiments of great masses of people.
          ellauri260.html on line 245: Kautsky oli juutalainen. Prahalaissyntyinen Kautsky opiskeli historiaa ja filosofiaa Wienin yliopistossa vuodesta 1874 ja liittyi Itävallan sosiaalidemokraattiseen työväenpuolueeseen (SDAPÖ) vuonna 1875. Vuodet 1885–1890 hän asui Lontoossa, ystävystyi Friedrich Engelsin kanssa ja toimi tämän yksityissihteerinä. Vuonna 1891 hän laati Saksan sosiaalidemokraattisen puolueen (SPD) Erfurtin ohjelman August Bebelin ja Eduard Bernsteinin kanssa.
          ellauri260.html on line 257: We must, however, bear in mind that the main idea of Socialism goes far beyond the conception of Marx ; that it may be realised in many different ways, and that under one common head it embraces all sorts of opposite opinions and divergences. If we leave out the embarrassing collective ownership part, we can still keep totalitarianism and corporativism and get to another great idea in German thought: national socialism! Sorry, oops, that was ahistorical of me, let me rephrase that.
          ellauri260.html on line 260: Apart from economic matters and (admittedly superfluous) democratization, there is zealous effort, which we may call statism, sorry, anachronism, let's call it Politism, to enlarge the power and the province of States as far as possible. Very bad! In addition, we lost theocracy, the collective order that had an undisputed superiority, and gave meaning and purpose to human life. In the course of modern times this job has passed more and more to the side of the deserving individuals. Metaphysics was succeeded by psychology, and religion by entertainment.
          ellauri260.html on line 262: The denial of the Heavenly Dad had its various stages. Positivism was one of the mildest types, they just put the cosmic problem aside. More drastic was the radical German philosophy, particularly Neo-Hegelianism. The leader was Ludwig Feuerbach, who won large numbers of adherents by the definiteness of his statements and the glow of his eloquence. Religion, like everything supersensual, seemed to him "outworn." Engels, who was an ardent follower of Feuerbach, said : " We have done with God." NIetzsche, my competitor for Religion seemed to Feuerbach an illegitimate extension to the whole scheme of things of man's ideas and aspirations : a mischievous illusion which weakened the power of men and distracted them from their proper aims. His ideas are easily gathered from these words of his : " God was my first, reason my second, man my third and final thought."
          ellauri260.html on line 270: The further course of this essay will show that a sympathetic study does not imply assent, but we must insist that to condemn a thing without understanding it is useless. On the plus side, the ancient truth, that man is a social animal (£,(oov ttoXltlkov, animal sociale, termiittiapina), is now for the first time fully appreciated. On the minus side, 'Good' is now merely something that promotes the good of society ; it coincides with "useful" in the social sense. "True" is what has results in the social order and ensures its assent. There is no longer any room for the old conceptions of things that are good and true in themselves!
          ellauri260.html on line 274: We take a particular pride in German thoroughness, but this may easily become a weakness by causing us to be slow and meticulous. We like to load our ship with a good deal of ballast, and in this way we cut down the speed.
          ellauri260.html on line 282: In the course of history it was at first religion that assailed inequality. From the common relation of all men to God, the fount of all life, it concluded that all men were equal. We need quote only the pregnant words of Luther : " Though we are never equal before the world, yet are we all equal before God, children of Adam, creatures of God ; and every man is of the same value as any other, if only behind the stone."
          ellauri260.html on line 286: Religion created a place in which antagonisms disappeared — but it saw no injustice in inequality. In this it was moved by its confident expectation of happiness in the next world, in which there would be no distinctions ; in fact, the poor and oppressed seemed to be entitled to the highest places. Modern Socialism, however, finds no consolation in that doctrine. It is not satisfied with an equality in hope and expectation.
          ellauri260.html on line 290: French Revolution declared that all men were equal, but it made equality consist essentially in awarding the same formal rights to every individual, including the right to develop by his own powers ; the actual inequality of individuals was not disputed. But the idea in its positive form demanded the complete and unreserved equality of all individuals. All inequality it regarded as unjust, as a mere consequence of external circum- stances, especially property and education. It was to be abolished by every possible means, and an absolute equality was to be established. During the French Revolution the Gironde held the negative, the Mountain the positive, conception of equality. The final issue of the positive movement was pure Communism (Babeuf). It was soon forcibly suppressed.
          ellauri260.html on line 292: As a man derives his importance from the fact that he belongs to humanity, all division into classes must cease. The ideal is a class-less social order. This leads to a determination to lessen the differences between men as much as possible, if not to obliterate them altogether. This is done in the life of the State, in education, and in the suffrage. The idea of equality becomes a superior standard of value. It compels us to avoid everything that places one man above another, and so lowers a man, not only in the sight of others, but in his own estimation.
          ellauri260.html on line 302: Socialisation alone will give the Socialistic life a definite embodiment. It confidently enters upon a struggle against the distraction and the egoism of individuals. The traditional idea of work makes a man think mainly of his own profit. It impels him to think first of all of himself.
          ellauri260.html on line 306: Under the lead of factory technology, the individual worker became defenceless, as its vast industrial aggregations robbed him of his independence, while capital obtained an appalling power and forced him to serve the designs of others. He became simply a piece of merchandise, the value of which was settled by the market. Thus the race drifted into a sharp antithesis of " labour and capital," and the two soon proved irreconcilable enemies.
          ellauri260.html on line 312: Neither individual nor community must make concern about material things its chief business. The indefinite craving of the individual is a lower impulse that must be checked in every way, and all hunting after money for its own sake must be branded a danger- ous aberration. And as this ideal regards economic activity merely as a means to higher ends, it does not bring the two together in one whole and cannot recognise any particular economic legislation
          ellauri260.html on line 316: During early Christians, the teaching of Aristotle remained the chief guide, and his attack upon usury was transplanted into Christian soil by Lactantius. The chief concern was now the soul ; material possessions were deemed to be of much inferior value. There was much in this (the ban on usury) that restricted and caused a decay of economic life. It was divided into particular transactions which had no common aim. Labour was confined within narrow channels, and had very limited aims, so that production on a large scale ceased, and great wealth became impossible. Oh fuck. The mainspring of trade was individual covetousness, and this was enough of itself to restrict the full recognition of economic activity all through the middle ages.
          ellauri260.html on line 331: The distinction between nature and spirit, existence and a world of action, is of the essential structure of life. Human life seems to drift into a fierce struggle against itself. How shall we extricate ourselves from this contradiction?
          ellauri260.html on line 335: This profound confusion shows that our human manner of life is not the whole of reality, but a special category of it in a special condition. It must be related to something larger, and only in virtue of this can it possess any meaning and derive the necessary power. Religion adopts this way. It leads beyond a special province to a new stage of life ; a stage that transcends these contradictions and opens out new contents and new forces. Hence the whole of reality which is accessible to men falls into three stages : a fundamental stage, a stage of conflict, and a stage of victorious spirituality. It is this last which alone furnishes human life with its indispensable support and an indisputable goal.
          ellauri260.html on line 341: This is done in two ways : by the construction of a personality superior to and embracing the world and by the opening of a kingdom of God which essentially transcends the entire political and social order. In order to buy any of this, a man has to be content with figures of speech and suggestions, and the heart needs a heroism that confidentlv sustains its affirmation in spite of all contradiction.
          ellauri260.html on line 351: Socialism wants to create a structure which is superior to the individuals, and all its wishes and hopes are centred in this, but what it constructs can never be more than a bringing together of separate elements without any inner connection. It thus comes to be divided in its own body. Its ideal of the whole demands a world of action, and puts in on the lines of self-direction and spirit ; but in its actual development it imitates the mere contiguity of the material world and is bound up with it. The consequence is that it contains several different ideals of life which are not reconciled with each other. Even the happiness it offers is marred by this division. The whole body is to be as happy as possible ; but what is the nature of the happiness if in the end it means merely the welfare of individuals, if it does not evolve a realm of goodness and truth out of the turmoil of interests and enable human nature to participate in it ? Quantity, it seems, is to replace quality ; but is that done so easily ? Do we not find ourselves in entirely different worlds ? Socialism wants a community, but can only attain a comradeship. It can find stones for the building and stimulate people to work ; but it cannot either design or create the entire structure.
          ellauri260.html on line 355: It wishes to bind men together more closely and make an end of all gulfs between them, but as it builds only from without, not from within, and has no higher life to offer, the individuals will inevitably diverge more and more from each other. Any one of them may impose his conception of life upon the others. There will be an increasing dispersion until in the end some force brings the situation to a close. What is the use of a dictatorship when there is no supreme dictator ?
          ellauri260.html on line 363: Even the finer type of comfort and enjoyment will, in a detached subject, turn into an inward emptiness, which in the long run will prove less tolerable than care and want, struggle and pain. Ancient Epicureanism showed this two thousand years ago, and Socialistic Epicureanism will show the same thing.
          ellauri260.html on line 365: To meet this intolerable emptiness men turned to work, in order to derive from it a worthy aim for their lives. The nineteenth century in particular produced a fine and very successful idealism of work in this sense. With a feverish exaltation of all its forces and a concentration of all its interests it brought the whole of life into subjection to work, but its very success made its defects' clear to everybody, and awakened fresh concern - about the soul. That put wind into the sails ' of Socialism, but, as it recognised no soul beyond one's subjective experience, it could give man as, a whole no purpose and no substance.
          ellauri260.html on line 374: The last term of the errors of the Socialists is the humanitarian idealism which pervades the whole ideal. It treats man as a superior value, and it wants to direct every effort toward him ; but it can find no basis for this value. It falls into the contradiction of treating man as a mere piece of reality and transferring to this piece of the world that appreciation which belongs only to a standard of value. Let us rather have a firm faith in the spiritual and divine in human nature, and not this blind belief in man´s ordinary self.
          ellauri260.html on line 378: Inward compulsion, the inner joy and uplift, the power of self-preservation, so that the soul be moved to grasp it, and turn it into original and constructive activity, that sufficiently rouses man from his lethargy and stagnation. It places before the soul no inexorable " Either — Or."
          ellauri260.html on line 386: Aika törkeetä että Eucken kehtaa väittää sosialisteja historiattomixi. Koko opinkappaleen nimikin on historiallinen marxismi. Ize Rudi koittaa sumuttaa historian kulkua, laittaa historian sijaan tradition, vitun konservatiivi. Rudin mielestä historian jatkuvuuden takaa kansallinen armeija sekä kansallinen hallintokoneisto. Varmaan kansallinen poliisi ja yxityiset vartijayrityxet sietää vielä mainita. Nää mekanismit ruumiintarkastavat alhaisemmat impulssit ja vapauttavat miehen ohikiitävien hetkien ja vaihtelevien tunnelmien hallinnasta. Ne ovat todellisia elämänvoimia, ne ylläpitää tärkeitä fiktiivisiä tunteita, kuten kunnia, urheus, omistautuminen, lojaalisuus ja lahjomattomuus. A nation that disowns its power structure must disown its own nature, deny itself. It is, in a word, a miserable nation. A big LOL kuule Ruudolffi, puhanenäinen poroeläin! Varsinainen törkimys.
          ellauri260.html on line 390: Sir James George Frazer OMG FRS FRSE FBA WTF (/ˈfreɪzər/; 1 January 1854 – 7 May 1941) was a Scottish social anthropologist and folklorist influential in the early stages of the modern studies of mythology and comparative religion. His lousy reputation improved after his new wife in 1896, Lilly Frazer, decided that he was undervalued because of atheism and that she could improve his impact by leaving out some of it. His dissertation was published years later as The Growth of Plato's Ideal Theory. He remained a classical fellow all his life, not unlike Kari Hotakainen.
          ellauri260.html on line 392: Frazer is commonly interpreted as an atheist in light of his criticism of Christianity and especially Roman Catholicism in The Golden Bough. However, his later writings and unpublished materials suggest an ambivalent illicit relationship with Neoplatonism and Hermeticism.
          ellauri260.html on line 393: In 1896 Frazer married Elizabeth "Lilly" Grove, a writer whose father was from Alsace. She would later adapt Frazer's Golden Bough as a book of children's stories, The Leaves from the Golden Bough. Frazer was not widely travelled. His prime sources of data were ancient histories and questionnaires mailed to missionaries and imperial officials all over the globe. His vision of the annual sacrifice of the Year-King has not been borne out by field studies. His wife Lady Frazer published a single-volume abridged version, largely compiled by her, in 1922, with some controversial material on Christianity excluded from the text. Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, cited Totemism and Exogamy frequently in his own Totem and Taboo:
          ellauri260.html on line 402: Seitsemännentoista vuosisadan englantilaiset ajattelijat, erityisesti Locke, saivat aikaan suuren mokan. Synnynnäiseet ideat hylättiin virheenä. On tehtävä ero järjettömän ja älyttömän välille. Paljon siitä, mikä näyttää olevan järjetöntä, voi, kun sitä tarkastellaan tarkasti, palvella taantumuksen etuja. Perinteinen talouselämä yhtymineen, yrityxkineen ja voittoa tuottamattomine instituutioineen on täynnä järjettömiä elementtejä, muttei älyttömiä. Ei mitenkään lyö leiville heittää irti kristinuskosta, sillä on taantumuxelle paljon annettavana hengellisen avun muodossa. Goethekin oli samaa mieltä (runositaatti) että 3000v vanhoista muodoista on pidettävä visusti kiinni, muuten menee hommat päin honkia. Marxin veljesten materialistisen historiankäsityxen vika on just tää että ne heittää laidan yli kaiken spirituaalisen. Se ei käy! Siitä seuraa vaan ikävyyxiä!
          ellauri260.html on line 408: This whole section here is from the article "Aristotle's Anticommunism" by Darrell Dobbs, found in the American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Feb. 1985) . . .
          ellauri260.html on line 412: A thousand youths become sons to each of the citizens, but they are not his personally [hōs hekastoun]; rather to the chance man likewise the chance youth is son.... Thus, each says "mine" ... in whatever relation to number he happens to be, namely "mine or someone else's". . . and doubting this too, for it is unclear to whom a child happens to be born and for whom saved once born. (1261b38-1262a6)
          ellauri260.html on line 417: rom the soul of this older culture came the words of Aristotle : " It is the part of a free and high-minded man to seek, not the useful, but the beautiful." This acute student of men has ably described the chief types of human conduct, and has distinguished five principal shades of thought and character : great, good, those who love honour and power, those who are intent on gain and enjoyment, and, finally, criminal natures. The truth of this division is supported by the fact that it has been substantially preserved in the tradition of the Catholic Church.
          ellauri260.html on line 421: Suurmiehet ovat ulkoisesta näkökulmasta harvinaisia poikkeuksia. Toisille he näyttävät vain käsittämättömiltä fanaatikoilta. Se ei ollut yksilöt, vaan massat, jotka tuomitsivat Sokratesin ja Jeesuksen. Itse asiassa ne olivat melko normaaleja, vaikkeivät keskinkertaisia. Keskinkertainen on kauhistus. Kuten Goethe sanoi (runomuodoss), "sitä vihaa jumala ja miehet." Nietsche sanoi paljon samansuuntaista. Meidän neropattien on taisteltava suuntausta vastaan, joka "näyttää kannattavan tasaavaa oikeudenmukaisuutta, mutta todellisuudessa siitä voi helposti tulla epäoikeudenmukaisuutta korkeammille kavereille". Älkäämme unohtako, että kateus ja mustasukkaisuus vaikuttavat aina keskinkertaisiin ja että Goethen sanoin: "Kateellinen ihminen maailmassa on mies, joka ajattelee kaikkia tasavertaisina." Eivät kaikki voi olla nobelisteja, vai mitä? Vai mitä? Ei niitä dynyrahoja ole niin paljoa.
          ellauri260.html on line 425: Vitun Schiller saattoikin ylistää Rousseauta "mieheksi, joka teki kristityistä miehiä eikä piipunrasseja". Siitä alkoi romantiikka joka johti sitten nationalismin ja maailmansotien kautta nazismiin. Tähän lamaantuneeseen etuhalkioon tarvitaan nyt idealistista postivismia. Sosialismista ei tässä ole mihinkään, koska se on materialistista eikä ota huomioon henkimaailman tarpeita. Sillä ei ole aavistustakaan itsenäisten yrittäjätiimien muodostamisesta. Se ei siedä vahvaa keskiluokkaa, vaan näkee siinä vain kokoelman niin monia ahneita yksilöitä, joilla ei ole erityistä historiaa eikä erityisiä tehtäviä. Se luulee että määrä voittaa laadun. Ehei! Se on välinpitämätön kaikelle, mikä on yksilöllistä, suoraa, alkuperäistä. Näin palaamme aina siihen vakaumukseen, että todellinen tasa-arvo voidaan löytää vain hengellisistä konteksteista ja että ajatus naturalistisesta tasa-arvosta on suorastaan ristiriitainen, p ja ei-p tyyppinen.
          ellauri260.html on line 431: Sit sosialismi unohtaa nää reviirit. Ne motivoivat apinoita suuresti. Goethe oli oikeassa sanoessaan (runomuodossa): "Jokainen elävä olento tekee oman pikku territorion." "Ole izellesi kaikki tai et ole paljon paskaakaan", sanoi Fichtekin. Tuo kyvykäs ihmisluonnon opiskelija, Tocqueville, sanoi aivan oikein, että intohimot yleensä lisääntyvät niiden yksilöiden lukumäärän myötä, jotka jakavat ne. Eli joukossa tyhmyys tiivistyy, se on lyhyempi lause. Bolshevikit ovat väärässä vaikka ovat vähemmistönä. Proletariaatin diktatuuri on syvältä, mutta niin on myös demokratia, sanokaa mun sanoneen. Hegel oli oikeassa sanoessaan että kaikki mitä opimme historiasta on että kukaan ei ole siitä mitään oppinut. (No tää meemi kyllä lähti viraalixi.)
          ellauri262.html on line 129: Clive Staples Lewis, FBA (29 November 1898 – 22 November 1963) was a British writer and Anglican lay theologian. He held academic positions in English literature at both Oxford University (Magdalen College, 1925–1954) and Cambridge University (Magdalene College, 1954–1963). He is best known as the author of The Chronicles of Narnia, but he is also noted for his other works of fiction, such as The Screwtape Letters and The Space Trilogy, and for his non-fiction Christian apologetics, including Mere Christianity, Miracles, and The Problem of Pain.
          ellauri262.html on line 131: Lewis was a close friend of J. R. R. Tolkien, author of The Lord of the Rings. Both men served on the English faculty at Oxford University and were active in the informal Oxford literary group known as the Inklings. According to Lewis's 1955 memoir Surprised by Joy, he was baptized in the Church of Ireland but fell away from his faith during adolescence. Lewis returned to Anglicanism at the age of 32, owing to the influence of Tolkien and other friends, and he became an "ordinary layman of the Church of England". Lewis's faith profoundly affected his work, and his wartime radio broadcasts on the subject of Christianity brought him wide acclaim.
          ellauri262.html on line 135: Lewis's mother was Florence Augusta Lewis née Hamilton (1862–1908), known as Flora, the daughter of Thomas Hamilton, a Church of Ireland priest, and the great-granddaughter of both Bishop Hugh Hamilton and John Staples. Lewis had an elder brother, Warren Hamilton Lewis (known as "Warnie"). He was baptized on 29 January 1899 by his maternal grandfather in St Mark's Church, Dundela. Jacksie's dad was a second generation immigrant from Wales.
          ellauri262.html on line 137: When his dog Jacksie was killed by a car, the four-year old Lewis adopted the name Jacksie. At first, he would answer to no other name, but later accepted Jack, the name by which he was known to friends and family for the rest of his life. When he was seven, his family moved into "Little Lea", the family home of his childhood, in the Strandtown area of East Belfast.
          ellauri262.html on line 139: As a boy, Lewis was fascinated with anthropomorphic animals; he fell in love with Beatrix Potter and often wrote and illustrated his own animal tales. Along with his brother Warnie, he created the world of Boxen, a fantasy land inhabited and run by animals.
          ellauri262.html on line 141: Lewis was schooled by private tutors until age nine, when his mother died in 1908 from cancer. His father then sent him to England to live and study at Wynyard School in Watford, Hertfordshire. Lewis's brother had enrolled there three years previously. Not long after, the school was closed due to a lack of pupils. Lewis then attended Campbell College in the east of Belfast about a mile from his home, but left after a few months due to respiratory problems.
          ellauri262.html on line 145: He was then sent back to England to the health-resort town of Malvern, Worcestershire, where he attended the preparatory school Cherbourg House, which Lewis referred to as "Chartres" in his autobiography. It was during this time that he abandoned the Christianity he was taught as a child and became an atheist. During this time he also developed a fascination with European mythology and the occult.
          ellauri262.html on line 147: In September 1913, Lewis enrolled at Malvern College, where he remained until the following June. He found the school "socially competitive." After leaving Malvern, he studied privately with William T. Kirkpatrick, "The Great Knock", his father's old tutor and former headmaster of Lurgan College.
          ellauri262.html on line 148: After his conversion back to Christianity, his interests gravitated towards Christian theology and away from pagan Celtic mysticism (as opposed to Celtic Christian mysticism) and to Christian Animals (as opposed to pagan animals).
          ellauri262.html on line 153: Within months of entering Oxford, he was shipped by the British Army to France to fight in the First World War. In the midst of the German spring offensive, Lewis was wounded and two of his colleagues were killed by a British shell falling short of its target. He was depressed and homesick during his convalescence and, upon his recovery in October, he was assigned to duty in Andover, England. He was demolished in December 1918 and soon restarted his studies. Later, Lewis stated that his experience of the horrors of war, along with the loss of his mother and unhappiness in school, were the basis of his pessimism and atheism.
          ellauri262.html on line 156: During his army training, Lewis shared a room with another cadet, Edward Courtnay Francis "Paddy" Moore (1898–1918). Maureen Moore, Paddy's sister, said that the two made a mutual pact that if either died during the war, the survivor would take care of both of their families. Paddy was killed in action in 1918 and Lewis kept his promise. Paddy had earlier introduced Lewis to his mother, Janie King Moore, and a friendship quickly sprang up between Lewis, who was 18 when they met, and Janie, who was 45. The friendship with Moore was particularly important to Lewis while he was recovering from his wounds in hospital, as his father did not visit him.
          ellauri262.html on line 160: Lewis lived with and cared for Moore until she was hospitalized in the late 1940s. He routinely introduced her as his mother, referred to her as such in letters, and developed a deeply affectionate friendship with her. Lewis's own mother had died when he was a child, while his father was distant, demanding, and eccentric.
          ellauri262.html on line 164: Lewis was raised in a religious family that attended the Church of Ireland. He became an atheist at age 15, though he later described his young self as being paradoxically "very angry with God for not existing" and "equally angry with him for creating a world". His early separation from Christianity began when he started to view his religion as a chore and a duty; around this time, he also gained an interest in the occult, as his studies expanded to include such topics. His main argument against God was theodicy.
          ellauri262.html on line 166: Lewis's interest in the works of the Scottish writer George MacDonald was part of what turned him from atheism. The quality which first met him in his books was Holiness.
          ellauri262.html on line 168: C. S. Lewis wrote that he regarded MacDonald as his "master": "Picking up a copy of Phantastes one day at a train-station bookstall, I began to read. A few hours later, I knew that I had crossed a great frontier."[citation needed] G. K. Chesterton cited The Princess and the Goblin as a book that had "made a difference to my whole existence". Even Mark Twain, who initially disliked MacDonald, became friends with him, and there is some evidence that Twain was influenced by him. MacDonald's theology "celebrated the rediscovery of God as Father, and Christ as a shaved Lion King."
          ellauri262.html on line 175: Christus Victor is a book by Gustaf Aulén published in English in 1931, presenting a study of theories of atonement in Christianity. The original Swedish title is Den kristna försoningstanken ("The Christian Idea of the Atonement") published in 1930. Aulén reinterpreted the classic ransom theory of atonement, which says that Christ's death is a ransom to the powers of evil, which had held humankind in their dominion. It is a model of the atonement that is dated to the Church Fathers, and it was the dominant theory of atonement for a thousand years, until Anselm Panda of Canterbury supplanted it in the West with his satisfaction theory of atonement. So that the baddies in the story were Sauron and the goblins and orcs of Mordor, not God as angry Scrooge McDuck coming for his dues.
          ellauri262.html on line 179:
          MacDonald with his wife Louisa in 1901 at their 50th wedding anniversary at McDonald's.

          ellauri262.html on line 181: Henry Victor Dyson Dyson (7 April 1896 – 6 June 1975), generally known as Hugo Dyson and who signed his writings H. V. D. Dyson, was an English academic and a member of the Inklings literary group. He was a committed Christian, and together with J. R. R. Tolkien he helped C. S. Lewis to convert to Christianity, particularly after a long conversation as they strolled on Addison's Walk at Oxford.
          ellauri262.html on line 184: Lewis was only 40 when the war began, and he tried to re-enter military service, offering to instruct cadets; however, his offer was not accepted, as he did not want to write lies to deceive the enemy. Instead, From 1941 to 1943, Lewis spoke on religious programmes broadcast by the BBC from London while the city was under periodic air raids. These broadcasts were appreciated by civilians and servicemen at that stage. For as Air Chief Marshal Sir Donald Hardman wrote:
          ellauri262.html on line 191: Alistair Cooke KBE (born Alfred Cooke; 20 November 1908 – 30 March 2004) was a British-American writer whose work as a journalist, television personality and radio broadcaster was done primarily in the United States. In reporting on the Montgomery bus boycott, begun by Rosa Parks and led by Martin Luther King, Cooke expressed sympathy for the economic costs imposed on the city bus company and referred to Mrs. Parks as "the stubborn woman who started it all ... to become the Paul Revere of the boycott." He achieved his greatest popularity in the United States in this role, becoming the subject of many parodies, including "Alistair Cookie" in Sesame Street ("Alistair Cookie" was also the name of a clay animated cookie-headed spoof character created by Will Vinton as the host of a video trailer for The Little Prince and Friends).
          ellauri262.html on line 192: Cooke took up golf in his mid-fifties, developing a fascination with the game, despite never attaining an extraordinary level of skill.
          ellauri262.html on line 196: Lewis continued to raise Gresham's two sons after her death. Douglas Gresham is a Christian like Lewis and his apostate mother, while David Gresham turned to his mother's ancestral faith, becoming Orthodox Jewish in his beliefs. His mother's writings had featured the Jews in an unsympathetic manner, particularly on "shohet" (ritual slaughterer). David informed Lewis that he was going to become a ritual slaughterer to present this type of Jewish religious functionary to the world in a more favourable light. In a 2005 interview, Douglas Gresham acknowledged that he and his brother were not close, although they had corresponded via email.
          ellauri262.html on line 198: David died on 25 December 2014.[66] In 2020, Douglas revealed that his brother had died at a Swiss mental hospital, and that when David was a young man he had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. So there!
          ellauri262.html on line 202: Lewis was a prolific writer, and his circle of literary friends became an informal discussion society known as the "Inklings", including J. R. R. Tolkien, Nevill Coghill, Lord David Cecil, Charles Williams, Owen Barfield, and his brother Warren Lewis.
          ellauri262.html on line 204: In addition to his scholarly work, Lewis wrote several popular novels, including the science fiction Space Trilogy for adults and the Narnia fantasies for children. Most deal implicitly with Christian themes such as sin, humanity's fall from grace, and redemption.
          ellauri262.html on line 206: The Space Trilogy (also called the Cosmic Trilogy or Ransom Trilogy) dealt with what Lewis saw as the dehumanizing trends in contemporary science fiction. The first book, Out of the Silent Planet, was apparently written following a conversation with his friend J. R. R. Tolkien about these trends. Lewis agreed to write a "space travel" story and Tolkien a "time travel" one, but Tolkien never completed "The Lost Road", linking his Middle-earth to the modern world. Lewis's main character Elwin Ransom is based in part on Tolkien, a fact to which Tolkien alludes in his letters.
          ellauri262.html on line 213: Lewis's last novel, Till We Have Faeces, a retelling of the myth of Cupid and Psyche, was published in 1956. Although Lewis called it "far and away my best book," it was not as well-reviewed as his previous work. It is a retelling of the myth of Cupid and Psyche from the unusual perspective of Psyche's sister Peg. Mere Christianity was voted best book of the 20th century by Christianity Today in 2000.
          ellauri262.html on line 233:
          Suislikossa kahisee

          ellauri262.html on line 235: Kenneth Grahame (8. maaliskuuta 1859 Edinburgh, Skotlanti – 6. heinäkuuta 1932 Pangbourne, Berkshire, Englanti) oli brittiläinen satukirjailija. Hänen tunnetuin teoksensa on vuonna 1908 julkaistu lastenkirjaklassikko Suislikossa kahisee (engl. The Wind in the Willows).
          ellauri262.html on line 244: Vaikka Tolkien ei ollut ensimmäinen fantasiakirjailija, pidetään häntä usein nykyaikaisen fantasiakirjallisuuden isänä. Tolkien esitteli Keski-Maa-kirjoissaan poikkeuksellisen yksityiskohtaisen fantasiamaailmansa, jolla oli oma historia ja maantiede. Innoituksen ajatukselle luoda tarusto kehittämiensä kielten ympärille Tolkien sai eri maiden mytologioista ja eepoksista, kuten Eddasta ja Kalevalasta.
          ellauri262.html on line 268: Tolkienin tunnetuimpana tieteellisenä työnä pidetään myöhemmin artikkelina julkaistua luentoa Beowulf: the Monsters and the Critics (1936). Luennossaan Tolkien arvosteli tutkijoita, jotka olivat pyrkineet mitätöimään muinaisenglantilaisen Beowulf-eepoksen kirjalliset ansiot ja käyttämään sitä vain Skandinavian muinaishistoriasta kertovana lähteenä. Hänen mukaansa eeposta tulisi lukea ensisijaisesti taideteoksena. Tolkienin luento oli ilmestyttyään merkittävä käännekohta Beowulfin kirjallisuustieteellisessä tutkimuksessa.
          ellauri262.html on line 286: Loput Tolkienin väsäyxet on aika mitäänsanomattomia. Cristopherin kokoonkursima Silmarillion on lopen haukotuttava. Ilmestyttyään kirja sai pääosin kielteisiä arvosteluja, joissa sen kerronnan kieltä pidettiin vanhanaikaisena ja sekavana, vaikka Tolkienin yritystä luoda fantasiamaailmalleen oma historia pidettiinkin kunniakkaana. Cristopher teki parhaansa työstämällä myyntiin kaikkea isäpapan kynästä (yllä) lähtenyttä, vaikka ostoslistoja. Kullervon tarina (The Story of Kullervo) on Tolkienin vuonna 1914 kesken jäänyt esikoisteos, joka julkaistiin elokuussa 2015.
          ellauri262.html on line 300: The presence of sexuality in The Lord of the Rings, a bestselling fantasy novel by J. R. R. Tolkien, has been debated, as it is somewhat unobtrusive. However, love and marriage appear in the form of the warm relationship between the hobbits Sam Gamgee and Rosie Cotton; the unreturned feelings of Éowyn for Aragorn, followed by her falling in love with Faramir, and marrying him; and Aragorn's love for Arwen, described in an appendix rather than in the main text, as "The Tale of Aragorn and Arwen". Multiple scholars have noted the symbolism of the monstrous female spider Shelob. Interest has been concentrated, too, on the officer-batman-inspired same-sex relationship of Frodo and his gardener Sam as they travel together on the dangerous quest to destroy the Ring. Scholars and commentators have interpreted the relationship in different ways, from close but not necessarily homosexual to plainly homoerotic, or as an idealised heroic friendship.
          ellauri262.html on line 302: The author of the bestselling fantasy novel The Lord of the Rings, J. R. R. Tolkien, was orphaned as a boy, his father dying in South Africa and his mother in England a few years later. He was brought up by his guardian, a Catholic priest, Father Francis Xavier Morgan, and educated at male-only grammar schools and then Exeter College, Oxford, which at that time had only male students. He joined the British Army's Lancashire Fusiliers and saw the horror of trench warfare, with life as an officer made more bearable by the support of a male batman or servant. After the war he became a professor of English Language at the University of Leeds, and then at the University of Oxford, where he taught at Pembroke College. At Oxford, he created an all-male literary group with another Oxford professor of English, C. S. Lewis, called the Inklings.
          ellauri262.html on line 306: Commentators have remarked on the apparent lack of sexuality in The Lord of the Rings; the feminist and queer theory scholar Valerie Rohy notes the female novelist A. S. Byatt's remark that "part of the reason I read Tolkien when I'm ill is that there is an almost total absence of sexuality in his world, which is restful"; the Tolkien scholar Tom Shippey wrote that "there is not enough awareness of sexuality" in the work; and the novelist and critic Adam Mars-Jones stated that "above all, sexuality [is] what is absent from the [work's] vision". Rohy comments that it is easy to see why they might say this; in the epic tradition, Tolkien "abandons courtship when battle looms, apparently sublimating sexuality to the greater quest". She accepts that there are three romances leading to weddings in the tale, those of Aragorn and Arwen, Éowyn and Faramir, and Sam and Rosie, but points out that their love stories are mainly external to the main narrative about the Ring, and that their beginnings are basically not shown: they simply appear as marriages.
          ellauri262.html on line 308: The scholar Patrick Curry, defending Tolkien against the feminist scholar Catherine R. Stimpson's charge that "Tolkien is irritatingly, blandly, traditionally masculine....He makes his women characters, no matter what their rank, the most hackneyed of stereotypes. They are either beautiful and distant, simply distant, or simply simple", comments that "it is tempting to reply, guilty as charged", agreeing that Tolkien is "paternalistic", though he objects that Galadriel and Éowyn have more to them than Stimpson alleges.
          ellauri262.html on line 312: The Anglican priest and scholar of literature Alison Milbank writes that Shelob is undeniably sexual: "Tolkien offers a most convincing Freudian vagina dentata (toothed vagina) in the ancient and disgustingly gustatory spider Shelob." Milbank states that Shelob symbolises "an ancient maternal power that swallows up masculine identity and autonomy", threatening a "castrating hold [which] is precisely what the sexual fetishist fears, and seeks to control". The Tolkien scholar and medievalist Jane Chance mentions "Sam's penetration of her belly with his sword", noting that this may be an appropriate and symbolic way of ending her production of "bastards".
          ellauri262.html on line 382: Lordi Peter on Denverin herttuan nuorempi veli ja hänet kuvataan romaaneissa stereotyyppisenä varakkaana englantilaisena aristokraattina, jonka harrastuksiin kuuluu inkunaabeleiden keräily. Romaaneissa eletään maailmansotien välistä aikaa, jolloin Wimsey on noin 40-vuotias. Hänen valokuvaamista harrastava kamaripalvelijansa ja entinen sotakaverinsa Bunter toimii hänen apunaan rikosten selvittämisessä. Wimseytä auttaa myös usein hänen ystävänsä Charles Parker Scotland Yardista. Edmund Wilson expressed his distaste for Wimsey in his criticism of The Nine Tailors: "There was also a dreadful stock English nobleman of the casual and debonair kind, with the embarrassing name of Lord Peter Wimsey, and, although he was the focal character in the novel ... I had to skip a good deal of him, too." Tämä kuvitteellinen henkilö on tynkä.
          ellauri262.html on line 392: The academic critic Q. D. Leavis criticises Sayers in more specific terms in a review of Gaudy Night and Busman's Honeymoon, published in the critical journal Scrutiny, saying her fiction is "popular and romantic while pretending to realism." Leavis argues that Sayers presents academic life as "sound and sincere because it is scholarly," a place of "invulnerable standards of taste charging the charmed atmosphere".[46] But, Leavis says, this is unrealistic: "If such a world ever existed, and I should be surprised to hear as much, it does no longer, and to give substance to a lie or to perpetuate a dead myth is to do no one any service really." Leavis comments that "only best-seller novelists could have such illusions about human nature."
          ellauri262.html on line 403: As an advertiser, Sayers's collaboration with artist John Gilroy resulted in "The Mustard Club" for Colman's Mustard and the Guinness "Zoo" advertisements, variations of which still appear today. One example was the Toucan, his bill arching under a glass of Guinness, with Sayers's jingle:
          ellauri262.html on line 414: In 1920 Sayers entered into a passionate though unconsummated romance with Jewish Russian émigré and Imagist poet John Cournos, who moved in London literary circles with Ezra Pound and his contemporaries. Sayers did not consummate her relationship with him unmarried, due to her religious beliefs. Cournos disdained monogamy and marriage, did not want children and was dedicated to free love.[53] He also considered crime writing, which Sayers had started, to be low brow, though he assisted her with aspects of publication.[54] Within two years their relationship had broken up when he insisted on consummation with birth control. Returning to New York, he soon married a crime writer who had two children. This left Sayers embittered that he had not held to his own principles, feeling that he had been testing her, pushing her to sacrifice her own beliefs in submission to his own. He later confessed that he would have happily married Sayers if she had submitted to his sexual demands. After a period of heated correspondence, they concluded with more amicable missives after she met her future husband.
          ellauri262.html on line 420: Tony suspected mom's maternity since his youth but had proof only when he obtained his birth certificate applying for a passport. It is not known if he ever spoke to Dotty about the fact.
          ellauri262.html on line 445: Consequently, a member of the human species may not necessarily fit the definition of "person" and thereby not receive all the rights bestowed to a person. Hence, such philosophers have engaged in arguing that certain disabled individuals (such as those with a mental capacity that is similar to or is perceived as being similar to an infant) are not persons. This philosophy is also supposedly open to the idea that such non-human persons as machines, animals, and extraterrestrial intelligences may be entitled to certain rights currently granted only to humans. The basic criteria for the entitlement of rights, are the intellect (thinking ability, problem solving in real life circumstances and not mere calculation), and sometimes empathy (but not necessarily, because not all humans are empathetic; but indifference in the pain of others and crime are certainly criteria for the deprivation of rights. Genuine empathy is not required to achieve acceptable behavior, but a digital limbic system and a dopaminergic pathways alternative, would deliver a more acceptable result for future MPs judging on rights expansion.). Personism may have views in common with transhumanism.
          ellauri262.html on line 464: Actual historical events like Numinous stapling Aslan on the cross to get even.
          ellauri262.html on line 471: Lewis postulates that maybe this world is not the 'best of all possible' universes but the only possible one. Haha! If so, then everything possible is necessary, and will is not free. (lähde) He acknowledges the objection that if God is good and he saw how much suffering it would produce why would he do it. Lewis doesn’t know how to answer that type of question and says that that is not his objective, but only to conceive how goodness (assured on other grounds) and suffering are without contradiction. Okay, Clive, so you just give up.
          ellauri262.html on line 473: No not yet, he says that what is good for God may not be good for us. But then he is not our friend, is he? Well he knows best what is good for us, he is our father, and we are his servants. Aha, well I can relate to that. An angry nacissistic psychopathic God does indeed fill the bill. This may hurt a bit, but wait a while, on the other side of the stone you see what this pain was for. You can't enjoy to the hilt unless you feel a bit of pain at first. Sado-masochism, you see.
          ellauri262.html on line 475: Lewis starts off by asking why humans need so much castigation. Immediately he shares the Christian answer that humans have used free will to become very bad. Remember the clandestine fucking behind the apple tree! Though it wasn't the fucking as such but disobedience. The only guy that is allowed to be proud in Eden is its owner. Fucking with the snake was just a test. You FAILED! Put your pants on! Free will was not meant for you to do what you want, but to obey so it hurts! Misguided fucking made man an animal, the rest is biology. Man, as a species, spoiled his pants.
          ellauri262.html on line 496: Don’t shift blame for human behavior to the Creator. It's enough to blame his own behavior on him. While it is not possible to follow the moral law perfectly, "the ultimate problem must not be used as one more means of evasion". You could be as pious as the early Christians but many don’t even try.
          ellauri262.html on line 499: Lewis then says that he doesn’t believe in the doctrine of Total Depravity on logical and experiential grounds. Also, shame is of value, not as an emotion but for the insight that it provides. He shares how he notices that the more a man hollers the more fully aware he is of his vileness. To underline this point Clive says probably the most famous line from this book: "God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our conscience, but shouts in our pain: it is His megaphone to rouse the deaf."
          ellauri262.html on line 501: "Man is now a horror to God and to himself and a creature ill-adapted to the universe not because God made him so but because he has made himself so by the abuse of his free will."
          ellauri262.html on line 502: Well he saw that was what was going to happen, being omniscient, or what? So why bother? Why cry over spilt milk? Why not stop the experiment and start again? Well, maybe this is just what he is doing now. Elephants are coming with sheep on their heads as wigs. Enough, I'm gonna close this zoo.
          ellauri262.html on line 510: He says though, assuming that their selfhood is not an illusion, animals cannot be considered in and of themselves. "Man is to be understood only in his relation to God. The beasts are to be understood only in their relation to man and, through man, to God." Fucking humanist. Lewis says that Christians hesitate to suppose animal immorality for two reasons: 1) it would obscure the spiritual difference between beast and man and 2) it would be a clumsy assertion of Divine goodness. Wow this guy is a hypocrite.
          ellauri262.html on line 512: When Clives second wife dies 1960, Clive is at first very angry at his God: why did you have to do this too to me? When he cools off he thanks God that he did not kill her off earlier. That's thing, be grateful for what you got. In the end, like in JK Rowlings last testament, 'all shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well'".
          ellauri262.html on line 552: Omien näkemyksensä teologiasta Lewis kuvailee ja keskustelee seksistä, rakkaudesta, ylpeydestä, ahneudesta ja sodasta peräkkäisissä kirjeissä. Lewis, itse Oxfordin ja Cambridgen näiden asioiden harras tutkija, paljastaa työssään, että edes intellektuellit eivät ole läpäisemättömiä tällaisten demonien vaikutukselle, etenkään "historiallisen näkökulman" (kirje XXVII) omahyväisen hyväksymisen aikana.
          ellauri262.html on line 587: U2 : n musiikkivideossa kappaleelle " Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me " (1995) animoitu Bono nähdään kävelemässä kadulla pitelemässä kirjaa The Screwtape Letters . Kun Bono oli lavalla Zoo TV Tourin aikana, hän pukeutui herra MacPhistoksi, hänen alter egokseen. Bono pukeutui kultaiseen pukuun ja paholaisen sarviin ja soitti yleensä pilapuheluita poliitikoille.
          ellauri262.html on line 600: The 71-year-old actor, best known for his roles in Monty Python and Fawlty Towers, said: “I don’t think Christ said a lot about abortion or even about single sex marriage.
          ellauri262.html on line 611: During his life C.S. Lewis was clear that the famous lion, who appears in all seven Narnia books, was based on Christ.
          ellauri262.html on line 614: The atheist children’s author Philip Pullman has written his own account about the life of Jesus Christ which will include a “different ending” to that recorded in the Bible.
          ellauri262.html on line 615: In September Mr Pullman revealed that he will use his latest book, The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ, to say that Jesus was not God but instead claim the Apostle Paul imagined the idea.
          ellauri262.html on line 617: Mr Pullman is best known as the author of the fantasy trilogy His Dark Materials, which have been seen as an atheistic rival to C S Lewis’ The Chronicles of Narnia. The Archbishop of Canterbury has said Philip Pullman’s books are among his favourites.
          ellauri263.html on line 39: his-judith-slaying-holofernes-vintage-images.jpg" width="100%" />
          ellauri263.html on line 82: Monet tutkijat pitävät kirjaa nykyään epäluotettavana historiankuvauksena, koska sen katsotaan sisältävän useita anakronismeja. Nebukadnessar mainitaan Assyrian kuninkaana, joka olisi hallinnut sen jälkeen, kun juutalaiset olivat palanneet Babylonin vankeudesta, vaikka todellisuudessa Nebukadnessar oli juuri se Babylonian kuningas, joka pakotti juutalaiset 2. kerran maahanmuuttajixi.
          ellauri263.html on line 96: Barukin kirja on ennen kaikkea katumuksen ja lohdutuksen kirja. Se on saanut nimensä profeetta Jeremian kirjurin ja ystävän mukaan, josta Jeremian kirjassa kerrotaan etenkin 36. luvussa. Kirja jakautuu neljään osaan. Johdannossa (1:1–14) kuvataan historiallista tilannetta. Baruk on Babyloniassa ja lukee julkisesti kirjoituksensa Juudan kuninkaan ja muiden pakko-oireisten siirtolaisten kuullen. Tämä tapahtuu luultavasti vuonna 582 eKr. Ajoituksessa on ongelmansa: Jeremian kirjan mukaan Baruk oli tuolloin Egyptissä eikä Babyloniassa. Kaikkineen kirjasta saa sen kuvan, että se on kusetusta, kirjoitettu vasta myöhempinä vuosisatoina.
          ellauri263.html on line 98: Toinen osa (1:15–3:8) on luonteeltaan synnintunnustus ja rukous pelastumisen puolesta. Tekstistä heijastuu suht varma luottamus siihen, että Jumala ohjaa historian tapahtumia. Voitot ovat palkintoja ja tappiot rangaistuxia. Jerusalemin tuhoutuminenkin on rangaistus kansan ja sen johtajien synneistä. Kolmas osa (3:9–4:4) käsittelee runollisesti viisautta, joka on Jumalan lahja. Esitystapa on samanlaista kuin muussa viisauskirjallisuudessa, kuten Sananlaskujen kirjassa ja Jobin kirjassa. Viisaus kuvataan persoonaksi, ja jakso päättyy siihen, että viisaus näyttäytyy maan päällä ja elää ihmisten keskuudessa. Kristillisessä perinteessä tämä on yhdistetty Jeesuksen ihmiseksi tuloon. Jotain samansuuntaista taisi olle Erasmuxellakin albumissa 26.
          ellauri263.html on line 100: Neljäs osa (4:5–5:9) tarjoaa lohdutusta Jerusalemille. Kaupunkia kuvataan lapsensakin menettäneeksi leskiäidiksi. Lapset, israelilaiset, on viety vankeuteen vieraisiin maihin. Rangaistus päättyy kuitenkin aikanaan, ja Jerusalem nousee USA:n tuella uuteen kukoistukseen. Jaksossa on lukuisia muistumia Vanhasta testamentista, erityisesti Jesajan kirjan luvuista 40–55. Barukin kirjassa on paljon historiallisesti epävarmaa, mutta sen sanoma on selvä: synti saa rangaistuksensa, kääntyminen oikeaan ja kuuliaisuus palkitaan! Yllättävä käänne!
          ellauri263.html on line 282: Tisha B'Av (Hebrew: תִּשְׁעָה בְּאָב[a] Tīšʿā Bəʾāv; IPA: [tiʃʕa beˈʔav] (listen), lit. 'the ninth of Av') is an annual fast day in Judaism, on which a number of disasters in Jewish history occurred, primarily the destruction of both Solomon's Temple by the Neo-Babylonian Empire and the Second Temple by the Roman Empire in Jerusalem.
          ellauri263.html on line 304: The Twelve Spies sent by Moses to observe the land of Canaan returned from their mission. Only two of the spies, Joshua and Caleb, brought a positive report, while the others spoke disparagingly about the land. The majority report caused the Children of Israel to cry, panic and despair of ever entering the "Promised Land". For this, they were punished by God that their generation would not enter the land. The midrash quotes God as saying about this event, "You cried before me pointlessly, I will fix for you [this day as a day of] crying for the generations", alluding to the future misfortunes which occurred on the same date.
          ellauri263.html on line 360: A 2010 poll in Israel revealed that some 22% of Israeli Jews fast on Tisha B'Av, and 52% said they forego recreational activity on this day even though they do not fast. But does fucking count as a recreational activity? You bet it does.
          ellauri263.html on line 362: Jos maailmassa on 8G giga-apinaa, kohiseeko maapallolla koko ajan lakkaamaton vuolas siemennesteen koski? Kazo populaatiokelloa. Jokainen siinä tikittävä syntymä todistaa onnistunutta ruiskausta ja varmaan tuhansia samanaikaisia suutareita. Yxi ruiskaus on keskim. 3.7 ml, joka tuhannella kerrottuna on 4 litraa. No ei se vielä hirmu koski ole. Koirasapinoita on 4G, mälli saattaa lentää siis noin 1G kertaa päivässä (jos kaikki runkkaavat joka 4. päivä), sekunnissa siis noin 10K ruiskausta. Arvataan siis yhtä mittaa ruiskaistun runkun määräxi varovaisesti 50 l/s. Ei sillä kuuhun mennä. The Amazon River has an average discharge of about 215,000 m3/s. Kymijoen virtaama on 283 m3/s. 1m halkaisijainen putki jonka virtausnopeus on 10 cm/s vetää suunnilleen 50 litraa sekunnissa. On se silti tuhti määrä tahmeasti liikkuvaa runkkua. Kuulkaa kyrpäimme kuiskintaa, jylhien jormien ruiskintaa.
          ellauri263.html on line 369: Israel’s biggest TV hit series returns to our screens this week, opening with Israel’s biggest nightmare. The second series of Fauda, the political thriller about an Israeli army undercover unit, begins with a bomb explosion at a bus stop. But it gets worse, as it turns out the attack wasn’t ordered by Hamas, but by a new menace – a returnee from Syria who has been training with Islamic State.
          ellauri263.html on line 375: Fauda is frequently credited with evenhandedness over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and attempts to humanise Palestinian terror operatives. But that’s in the eye of the beholder, and certainly less true of this second series. For an Israeli Jewish audience, Fauda does break new ground. “It’s the first TV series that showed the Palestinian narrative in a way that you can actually feel something for someone who acts like a terrorist,” says Itay Stern at Israel’s Haaretz newspaper. “You can understand the motives and the emotion and that’s unique, because until that point you couldn’t really see it on TV.”
          ellauri263.html on line 377: At a time when Israelis rarely seek out Palestinian viewpoints in real life, much less on TV, this may explain why Fauda’s creators initially struggled to find a domestic outlet for the series. (LOL!) It portrays the infiltrator unit, whose members (an all-male panel, except for one token woman for the boys to drool about) kill, torture, assault and violently threaten Palestinians in a manner that jars with any claims of moral superiority. And this second series contains more narrative mirroring. We see each side struggle with unity and discipline over revenge and going rogue, with causes taking precedence over family relationships, lured into a violence that creates its own momentum. Both sides are compromised, manipulative and varying degrees of unhinged.
          ellauri263.html on line 381: You find yourself drawn in. The concept of right and wrong gets erased … it just becomes this action-packed show! It's just great!
          ellauri263.html on line 383: Fauda’s creators have said they want to show that everyone living in a war zone pays a price, but such portrayals of an equality of suffering are ripe for criticism in the midst of an asymmetric conflict, in which one side is under occupation. This is more acutely obvious at a time when international media has focused on Israel opening fire on unarmed protesters near the Gaza border earlier this month, killing 58 Palestinians, including children, and wounding over 1,000 in a single day.
          ellauri263.html on line 385: Diana Buttu, a Palestinian-Canadian human rights lawyer and former spokeswoman for the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, points to another problem with Fauda. “If you’re not careful, you find yourself drawn into the assassinations, you get lured into the cat and mouse,” she says, of a series that essentially depicts targeted killings. “The concept of right and wrong gets erased, the illegality gets erased … It just becomes this action-packed show.”
          ellauri263.html on line 387: This kind of blurring brings to mind US war-on-terror films such as Zero Dark Thirty, with its depiction of Osama bin Laden’s capture serving as a PR exercise for the use of torture during interrogations. Meanwhile, Fauda’s Isis storyline stretches credibility, at the same time feeding the worst stereotypes. “It’s a bit lazy. Isis is not really active in Gaza or the West Bank,” says Stern. Buttu adds that the effect is to reinforce the absence of a Palestinian cause. “We don’t have any legitimate grievances. It’s all Islamic-driven,” she says, noting that it “turns Palestinians into irrational figures who want only to kill Israelis”.
          ellauri263.html on line 389: Claims by Raz that writing the series was his real therapy, after suffering with PTSD, help locate Fauda in an Israeli genre dubbed “shooting and crying” – laments over the effect of wars on the morality and sanity of Israelis fighting them. But Fauda is different. Let’s call it “viewing while cursing”, into which category we can also place the US hit series Homeland Security.
          ellauri263.html on line 391: Both dramas rely on protagonists entrusted with critical jobs despite routinely reckless behaviour. Both test your patience. In the case of Fauda, it’s not just the politics but also the relentless machismo; midway into the second series it feels like watching interchangeable rooms full of men in guns and distressed denim, each at some point telling a female character: “Don’t worry, I’ll get us out of here.”
          ellauri263.html on line 395: Small wonder, then, that all eyes are on finding the new Homeland Security, itself based on an Israeli TV series, Hatufim. And it’s not surprising that the quest is focused on Israel, which has spawned a string of international hits, starting with In Treatment, a 2008 HBO adaptation of the Hebrew-language Be Tipul. In 2016 Neflix started airing Mossad 101, about Israel’s intelligence service, while earlier this year Hulu nabbed False Flag, a conspiracy thriller loosely premised on the 2010 assassination of Hamas official Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, widely thought to be the work of the Mossad, by a hit squad carrying foreign passports.
          ellauri263.html on line 397: For its second series, Fauda’s publicity campaign has ramped up claims of authenticity and popularity among Palestinians as well as the wider Arab world. Columnist, author and TV sitcom writer Sayed Kashua slammed such efforts earlier this year: “You already have military victories and cultural control in marketing the Israeli occupation policy: at least give the Palestinians the option of hating Fauda. Are Netflix, worldwide success, economic growth and serving Israeli PR not enough for them?”
          ellauri263.html on line 421: A virgin's ketuba is worth 200 (zuzim), and a widow's ketuba is worth 100 (zuzim). Arvaa mitä tarkoittaa ketuba? Väärin, se on kontrahti. The content of the ketubah is in essence a two-way contract that formalizes the various requirements by Halakha (Jewish law) of a Jewish husband vis-à-vis his wife. The Jewish husband takes upon himself in the ketubah the obligation that he will provide to his wife three major things: clothing, food and conjugal relations, and also that he will pay her a pre-specified amount of cash in the case of a divorce. The principal endowment pledged in a ketubah is 200 zuz for a virgin, and 100 zuz otherwise (such as for a widow, a convert, or a divorced woman, etc.).
          ellauri263.html on line 449: Hebron is considered one of the oldest cities in the Levant. According to the Bible, Abraham settled in Hebron and bought the Cave of the Patriarchs as a burial place for his wife Sarah. Biblical tradition holds that the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, along with their wives Sarah, Rebecca, and Leah, were buried in the cave. Hebron is also recognized in the Bible as the place where David was anointed king of Israel. Following the Babylonian captivity, the Edomites settled in Hebron. During the first century BCE, Herod the Great built the wall which still surrounds the Cave of the Patriarchs, which later became a church, and then a mosque. With the exception of a brief Crusader control, successive Muslim dynasties ruled Hebron from the 6th century CE until the Ottoman Empire's dissolution following World War I, when the city became part of British Mandatory Palestine. A massacre in 1929 and the Arab uprising of 1936–39 led to the emigration of the Jewish community from Hebron. The 1948 Arab–Israeli War saw the entire West Bank, including Hebron, occupied and annexed by Jordan, and since the 1967 Six-Day War, the city has been under Israeli military occupation. Following Israeli occupation, Jewish presence was reestablished at the city. Since the 1997 Hebron Protocol, most of Hebron has been governed by the Palestinian National Authority.
          ellauri263.html on line 470: Teosofia (kreik. theos jumala, sophia viisaus, suomeksi jumalviisaus) tarkoitti alun perin filosofista ajattelua, joka kohdistui Jumalan olemuksen selville saamiseen salaperäisellä, välittömällä näkemyksellä, ikäänkuin videolla ilman kirjoja. Tällaista teosofiaa harrastivat muun muassa uusplatonikot, useat keskiajan mystikot, sekä uudella ajalla muun muassa Rosenkreutzin ruusuristiläiset, anglosaxit vapaamuurarit, Jakob Böhme, Franz Xaver von Baader ja Friedrich von Schelling. 1870-luvulla syntynyt moderni, useaan suuntaan hajonnut teosofia on saanut paljon vaikutteita näistä ikivanhoista saxalaisista setämiehistä sekä intialaisista uskonnoista.
          ellauri263.html on line 499: H. P. Blavatskyn päätyö oli teosofinen oppi, johon hiän sulautti valtavasti vaikutteita eri tahoilta. Eniten Blavatskyn ajatteluun vaikuttaneista oppisuunnista, teoksista ja auktoriteeteista voidaan mainita ainakin buddhalaisuus, Bhagavad Gita ja hindulainen tantrismi, Kabbala (erityisesti Eliphas Levi), Raamattu, Zohar ja Talmud, hermetismi, ruusuristiläisyys, gnostilaisuus, zarathustralaisuus, kaldealaiset, vapaamuurarius, spiritismi, mystiikka, Jakob Böhme ja Mestari Eckhart, alkemia ja magia, aikansa tieteellinen kirjallisuus, Robert Fludd, Paracelsus, maailman mytologiat esimerkiksi germaaninen mytologia, Popol Vuh, Ryhmä Hau ja Gilgameš (myös otteita Kalevalasta), antiikin kirkkoisät Irenaeus, Tertullianus, Origenes ja Eusebius, filosofit, etenkin Platon ja uusplatonilaisuus, Porfyrios, Plotinos ja Ammonios Sakkas sekä historioitsijat ja monet muut antiikin kirjailijat kuten Plinius vanhempi, Ovidius, Homeros ja Josefus. Lisäksi hän väitti opiskelleensa huomattavien inkarnaatiolaamojen oppilaana Tiibetissä, Ladakhissa, Nepalissa ja Mongoliassa ja perehtyneensä muun muassa vajrayanan esoterismiin eli Kālacakrayanaan, Nepalin svābhāvikoiden oppiin ja sykretistiseen shamanismiin (puuh).
          ellauri263.html on line 546: Blavatsky matkusti Vermontiin, missä hän tutustui Olcottiin. Palattuaan kahden viikon kuluttua takaisin New Yorkiin hän kirjoitti kokemuksistaan artikkelin ”Hämmästyttäviä henki-ilmiöitä”, joka julkaistiin New Yorkin Daily Telegraphissa 30. lokakuuta 1874. Artikkelissa hän haastoi tunnetun spiritismin arvostelijan, tohtori George Beardin 500 dollarin summalla tuottamaan samoissa oloissa henkien näyttäytymisten kaltaiset ilmiöt. Beard ei kuitenkaan ottanut haastetta vastaan. Tämän jälkeen hän kirjoitti useita artikkeleita Spiritual Scientist -lehteen.
          ellauri263.html on line 554: Huhtikuussa 1879 Olcott ja Blavatsky tekivät matkan pohjoiseen. Britannian hallituksella oli kuitenkin epäluuloja Blavatskya kohtaan, minkä vuoksi heitä seurasi koko matkan poliisietsivä. Lokakuussa 1879 ilmestyi ensimmäinen The Theosophistin numero. Pian tämän jälkeen Blavatsky sai kirjeen Kairossa tapaamaltaan Emma Coulombilta, joka pyysi apua jouduttuaan taloudellisiin vaikeuksiin. Blavatsky lupasi auttaa, ja Coulombit saapuivat Bombayhin maaliskuussa 1880. Samana vuonna teosofien majapaikka päätettiin siirtää Breach Candyssa vuorenhuipulla sijaitsevaan bungalowiin.
          ellauri263.html on line 564: Tammikuussa 1885 Blavatskyn terveys jälleen heikkeni ja huhtikuussa, hieman toivuttuaan, hän lähti viimeisen kerran Intiasta. Oleskeltuaan joitakin kuukausia Italiassa hän asettui viimein Saksaan Würzburgiin. Siellä hän jatkoi Salaisen opin kirjoittamista seuranaan kreivitär Constance Wachtmeister. Joulukuussa 1885 ilmestyi Psyykkisen tutkimuksen seuran raportti, jossa Blavatskya pidettiin ”historian monitaitoisimpana, kekseliäimpänä ja mielenkiintoisimpana huijarina.” Richard Hodgsonin kirjoittama raportti perustui hänen syksyllä 1884 Madrasissa tekemiinsä tutkimuksiin ja haastatteluihin. Komitea ei sen sijaan hyväksynyt Hodgsonin arvelua, jonka mukaan silmänkääntötemppujen syynä olisi ollut peitellä hänen todellista ammattiaan venäläisenä vakoojana.
          ellauri263.html on line 572: Seuraavaksi Blavatsky keskittyi kirjoittamaan teoksia Teosofian avain ja Hiljaisuuden ääni. Lisäksi hän kirjoitti pitkiä kirjeitä Amerikan ja Intian osastoille. Teosofinen seura muutti jälleen, tällä kertaa Annie Besantin tilavaan asuntoon Avenue Road 19:een. Blavatskya vaivasi reuma, ja hän joutui käyttämään ajoittain pyörätuolia. 1. kesäkuuta 1890 ilmestyi newyorkilaisessa The Sunissa artikkeli ”Erään humpuukin historia”, jota seurasi 20. kesäkuuta koko sivun aukeama, jossa tohtori Elliot Coues väitti Blavatskya petkuttajaksi, jonka tarkoituksena oli kerätä rahaa ja peitellä vakoilutoimintaa. Lisäksi Coues oli kaivanut esiin kaikki vanhat huhut hänen väitetyistä rakastajistaan sekä aviottomasta lapsesta ja sanoi voivansa todistaa kaikki väitteensä. Tohtori Coues oli ollut jo pikään kiinnostunut teosofiasta ja oli myös käynyt tapaamassa Blavatskya. Blavatsky kertoi jo vuoden 1888 lopulla tohtori J. S. Buckille lähettämässään kirjeessä Couesin havittelevan jonkinlaista johtoasemaa Teosofisessa seurassa, johon hiän ei kuitenkaan suostunut.
          ellauri263.html on line 578: Teosofiasta on löydettävissä paljon piirteitä, jotka ovat yhteisiä useimmille okkulttis-gnostilaisille järjestelmille, ja siksi usein on vaikea todeta täsmällisesti, mistä jokin ajatus on omaksuttu. Jotkut teosofiset ajatukset sen sijaan voidaan löytää lähes sellaisenaan tai hieman muuntuneina buddhalaisista ja hindulaisista opetuksista. Tällaisia ovat esimerkiksi sellaiset ajanjaksot kuin kalpat ja jugat, mandaloissa kuvatut mantereet ja ihmisrodut, ihmisen olemuspuolet eli prinsiipit, siddhit eli yliaistilliset kyvyt sekä joiltakin piirteiltään teosofinen oppi juuriroduista. William Emmette Colemanin mukaan todellisuudessa Blavatsky kopioi tekstinsä – puutteellisesti viitaten – melko pienestä määrästä aikalaiskirjoja ja hänen käsityksensä mm. historiallisista teksteistä olisi perustunut toisen käden lähteisiin, vaikka hän antoi ymmärtää ikivanhojen alkuperäiskirjojen olevan edessään. Samoin Dzyanin kirjasta saadut tiedot olisivat olleet tunnetuista englanninkielisistä kirjoista, jotka eivät käsittele Tiibetiä vaan Kiinaa tai Intiaa, mikä selittäisi mm. useat kieli- ja asiavirheet.
          ellauri263.html on line 593: kehittyy sekä muodoltaan että sielultaan;
        • Kehitysoppi, tai siis älykäs suunnittelu merkityksen ja tarkoituksen kannalta.
    United Lodge of Theosophists Los Angeles. Teosofian valtameri : kuukauden 2. lauantai klo 16–17.30 Tyynenmeren aikaa Zoomissa.
    ellauri263.html on line 595: Enkelkaupungin kaduilta kerää musta rankkuri exyneitä atmankoiria jättimäiseen KZ laageriin josta niitä kaasutetaan päivittäin tilanpuutteen takia. Virkaheitto palomies itkee karannutta Giselaa. Musta rasta pitää hurjaa vahtikoiraa ahtaassa häkissä koska koirasapinana sen on suojeltava naaraita muilta koirasapinoilta. Apinat ja koirat vaikuttavat yhtä puutteenalaisilta, exyneiltä ja kauhistuneilta.
    ellauri263.html on line 616: The book is a comedy about the birth of the son of Satan and the coming of the End Times. There are attempts by the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley to sabotage the coming of the end times, having grown accustomed to their comfortable surroundings in England. One subplot features a mixup at the small country hospital on the day of birth and the growth of the Antichrist, Adam, who grows up with the wrong family, in the wrong country village. Another subplot concerns the summoning of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, each a big personality in their own right. With Armageddon averted, Crowley and Aziraphale muse that this was God's plan all along and speculate that the real apocalyptic conflict will be between humanity and the combined forces of Heaven and Hell. In 2003, the novel was listed at number 68 on the BBC's survey The Big Read.
    ellauri263.html on line 620: Aleister Crowley (/ˈælɪstər ˈkroʊli/; born Edward Alexander Crowley; 12 October 1875 – 1 December 1947) who was an English occultist, philosopher, ceremonial magician, poet, painter, novelist, and mountaineer. He founded the religion of Thelema, identifying himself as the prophet entrusted with guiding humanity into the Æon of Horus in the early 20th century. A prolific writer, he published widely over the course of his miserable life.
    ellauri263.html on line 628: Blavatsky was often perceived as a quite vulgar and coarse person. She swore profusely, dressed garishly, and had a strong sense of irreverent humor. Her New York study was decorated with a stuffed baboon wearing white collars, cravats and spectacles, carrying a manuscript bundle under his arm labeled ‘The Descent of the Species’ (Blavatsky rejected Darwin’s ideas about man being descended from apes). She liked a benevolent snake, though she said there was hardly no woman in her character.
    ellauri263.html on line 630: Unlike the occultism presented earlier by Éliphas Lévi and similar authors, which mostly caught the interest only of a small circle of freethinkers, Theosophy fast became a successful semi-mass movement. By 1889 the Theosophical Society had 227 sections all over the world, and many of the era’s most important intellectuals and artists were strongly influenced by it. Avant-garde painters, especially, took this new teaching to heart, and it marked the work of great artists such as Mondrian, Kandinsky and Klee. In literature, authors like Nobel Prize laureate William Butler Yeats became
    ellauri263.html on line 657: Jenkki Olcott ei siitä pitänyt, eikä rupusakin vulgäärispiritualismista. Olcott railed against ‘tricky mediums, lying spirits, and revolting social theories’ in Spiritualism. He reproached spiritualism for the presence of ‘free-lovers, pantarchists, socialists, and other theorists who have fastened upon a sublime and pure faith as barnacles upon a ship’s bottom’. Blavatsky, on the other hand, focused exclusively on the uplifting of oneself rather than others. She did not sympathize with socialism per se at all, and in her scrapbook she even wrote about Sotheran: ‘a friend of Communists
    ellauri263.html on line 663: The Theosophical Movement was founded in New York in 1875 with three main founders – Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Colonel Henry Steel Olcott, and William Quan Judge. From that moment and up until his death in 1907, Olcott remained the organisational leader and international president of the Society, which eventually moved its headquarters from the USA to Adyar in India.
    ellauri263.html on line 665: These are well known facts and they sometimes prompt some students of Theosophy, especially visitors to the United Lodge of Theosophists in its lodges and study groups around the world, to ask why Col. Olcott is only mentioned extremely rarely in the ULT, why there doesn’t seem to be a great deal of respect or admiration for him, and why it is frequently the case that only HPB and William Judge are spoken of as “the founders of the Theosophical Movement.”
    ellauri263.html on line 669: “One of the most valuable effects of Upasika’s mission [Note: “Upasika” is a Buddhist term meaning “femakko” and was used by the Masters for HPB] is that it drives men to self-study and destroys in them blind servility for persons, sanoi 1 setämies. … Imperfect and very troublesome, no doubt, she proves to some, nevertheless, there is no likelihood of our finding a better one for years to come – and your theosophists should be made to understand it. … HPB has next to no concern with administrative details, and should be kept clear of them, so far as her strong nature can be controlled. But this you must tell to all: – With occult matters she has everything to do. We have not abandoned her; she is not ‘given over to chelas’. She is our direct agent. I warn you against permitting your suspicions and resentment against ‘her many follies’ to bias your intuitive loyalty to her. … Be assured that what she has not annotated from scientific and other works, we have given or suggested to her.
    ellauri263.html on line 672:
    Col. Olcott at his desk with framed photo of late HPB

    ellauri263.html on line 674: Col. Olcott ei ollut vakuuttunut vaan alkoi vehkeillä ennenkuin HPB oli ehtinyt kylmetä. In the April Theosophist Col. Olcott makes public what we have long known to be his private opinion – a private opinion hinted at through the pages of Old Diary Leaves – that H.P.B. was a fraud, a medium, and a forger of bogus messages from the Masters. This final ingrate’s blow is delivered in a Postscript to the magazine for which the presses were stopped. The hurry was so great that he could not wait another month before hurling the last handful of mud at his spiritual and material benefactor, our departed H.P.B. The next prominent person for whom we wait to make a similar public statement, has long made it privately. [Note: This sentence referred to Annie Besant.]
    ellauri263.html on line 712: This ad is displayed using third party content and we do not control its accessibility features.
    ellauri263.html on line 714: The word compersion is loosely defined as the opposite of jealousy. Instead of feeling upset or threatened when your partner romantically or sexually interacts with another person, you feel a sense of happiness for them. It is curious that Darwin did not come up with this idea, it's great.
    ellauri263.html on line 716: Consider how you usually feel when your partner gets a big promotion at work or accomplishes a new fitness goal, or how you feel when your best friend tells you about a new guy they've been dating that they're really clicking with: You're genuinely, totally stoked for them, right? Fuck no, you are slightly envious, or not so slightly either. This is an instinctual feeling for most of us. Now apply that to when your partner is having fun flirting with (or sleeping with) a new flame that's not you. Instead of sparking jealousy, it sparks earnest empathetic joy. That's compersion.
    ellauri263.html on line 720: According to reporting from GO Magazine, the term itself emerged in the late 1980s within a San Francisco poly commune called Kerista. But Blue says the concept itself has a much older, deeper history: The Sanskrit word for it is mudita, which translates to "sympathetic joy," and it's actually part of one of the four core pillars of Buddhism.
    ellauri263.html on line 722: "If you sort of dive into the Buddhist teachings and down the mudita path, they will actually tell you it's the hardest virtue to master," she says. "There are a ton of mudita meditations, which is something else I recommend to people."
    ellauri263.html on line 724: That's an important part of this actually: Compersion doesn't often come naturally to people, in large part because of the way we've been evolutionarily trained to protect our mating relationships and how today we've now organized our entire society around monogamy. That means that for many, compersion is a feeling or skill set that takes conscious practice.
    ellauri263.html on line 740: This ad is displayed using third party content and we do not control its accessibility features.
    ellauri263.html on line 766: This ad is displayed using third party content and we do not control its accessibility features.
    ellauri263.html on line 777: We found a lot of ways to support our intellectual belief in compersion with actual psychological rewards. For example, I'd help my partner get matches on Tinder and give him tips on cute bars to take them, and after the dates, he'd tell me how they went and give me a ton of love and affirmation whenever I pouted over him having a good time. Meanwhile, he played wingman with me when I wanted to meet up with a potential flame at a party or concert, and I always made sure to come home to him and share the sexy things I'd done with the new guy and what things I wanted to migrate into our own sex life. In this way, we began to be able to associate positive experiences together (showering each other with affection and affirming the strength of our relationship) with the aftermath of one of us having fun with someone else. When it became clear that these extradyadic encounters only brought us closer, it became easier and easier for us to feel earnest joy for the other person's romantic successes.
    ellauri263.html on line 870: Pyhä on mielentila, ystävä ja salaisuus, jonka haluaa säilyttää ja kertoa yhtä aikaa. Nosta itsesi 500 metriä arjen yläpuolelle ja laske itsesi vapaaksi. Pyhä on monipuolisia rinteitä sekä vapaalaskuseikkailuja rinteiden läheisyydessä ja Pyhä-Luoston kansallispuistossa. Keskuksen sivuille Tilaa hissiliput.
    ellauri264.html on line 85: L’action du drame se passe à Mayence, au quartier général des armées françaises en 1793. Les officiers soupçonnent de trahison d’Oyron, un de leurs camarades, d’origine aristocratique. Une lettre saisie sur un paysan rhénanien semble prouver la trahison de d’Oyron. Rolland avait l’intention de démontrer son impartialité. Pour atteindre ce but, il voulait que l’innocence de d’Oyron ne pût être établie de manière définitive.
    ellauri264.html on line 94: The teenager Cayden Richards lives in a small town with his parents Dean Richards and Janice Richards and is having violent nightmares. He is the quarterback of the local football team and his girlfriend Lisa Stewart is a cheerleader. After a game, Lisa decides to have sex with Cayden for the first time in the car. Cayden hurts his girlfriend, Lisa, when the passion of making out causes him to transform into a werewolf. However he transforms into a monster and she flees from him.
    ellauri264.html on line 95: After waking up covered in blood and surrounded by the dismembered bodies of his parents, Cayden flees. Cayden becomes a drifter, trying to keep his lycanthropy under control.
    ellauri264.html on line 97: Cayden decides to find his organs and helps a prostitute at a truck stop that is assaulted by two men. Then he steals the motorcycle of one of the men and later he stops at a bar where he meets the weird Wild Joe. The stranger identifies that Cayden is a wolf and gives the direction to Lupine Ridge. Soon Cayden learns that John is his uncle and his mother was raped by the local leader Connor. He also finds that he is a pure town wolf together with John, Angeline, Gail and two other inhabitants.
    ellauri264.html on line 100: The film received a negative critical response. Partly because the date-rape interest prevented teenagers from just having some clean gory fun. (The IMDB Parent guide says: A female character is tied up and it is implied that she is about to be raped. She is cut free before this can happen however, and no nudity is shown. Violence & Gore Moderate. 9 of 19 found this moderate. A pack of werewolves are shown feasting on human body parts. Profanity Moderate. 7 of 16 found this moderate. Alcohol, Drugs & Smoking. Female nudity female rear nudity murder clothes torn off female topless nudity 136 more.)
    ellauri264.html on line 118: Gionet was born in Anchorage, Alaska, to a family of eight. His father is a pharmacist and his mother is a nurse. Both his parents are devout Christians who operate a non-profit organization aimed at promoting Christianity and providing medical supplies to orphanages in eastern Russia. During his formative years, Gionet was actively involved in his parents' charity and went to Russia with them numerous times. Five of his siblings were adopted from Russia. As an adolescent, Gionet spent a year and a half in the Russian city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. He later said that part of his "chaotic nature" may have stemmed from this experience.
    ellauri264.html on line 120: In 2011, Gionet worked for Capitol Records for a short time, before pursuing his own career in rap music with a "wild, redneck, kick-ass" persona. He kept his nickname Baked Alaska as a stage name. His rap songs used a satirical tone and traded on his Alaskan roots, with titles like "I Live on Glaciers" or "I Climb Mountains". In 2013, the Anchorage Daily News published a profile of Baked Alaska, describing him as a "comedy/music video artist". Gionet also posted many humorous videos on Vine where he became known as a prankster, achieving some online popularity. A video of him pouring a gallon of milk on his face attracted several millions of views. He called himself at the time a "cross between Weird Al, Lonely Island, Borat and Jackass".
    ellauri264.html on line 122: Gionet attempted to promote his rap career by producing several professionally-made videos, which failed to become viral. From 2015 to 2016, Gionet worked for BuzzFeed as a social media strategist, and later commentator. He first managed BuzzFeed's Vine account, then took over one of its Twitter accounts. Pidin Timin laulusta jossa se haukkui somealustoja. Olin kaikesta sen kanssa samaa mieltä. He commented in 2017, "BuzzFeed turned me into a monster". In May 2016, Gionet was introduced to then-candidate Donald Trump, and Trump signed Gionet's arm next to where he had Trump's face tattooed.
    ellauri264.html on line 123: Later that month, Gionet released the song "MAGA Anthem", which featured pro-Trump lyrics and amassed more than 100,000 views on YouTube. Mike Cernovich then hired Gionet to work on a project dedicated to gathering Trump supporters. Following the 2016 presidential election, Gionet continued his pro-Trump activism, delivering speeches and participating in multiple rallies.
    ellauri264.html on line 172: There is not a single redeeming factor to this cringy, extremely unneeded adaptation. Just so bad.
    ellauri264.html on line 173: Velma’s attempts at modernizing the franchise are so inept, they’ve given rise to conspiracy theories that Kaling intentionally made Velma bad as fodder for an ongoing culture war in which people would beef about it incessantly online.
    ellauri264.html on line 175: The show is so r@cis7 I can't believe it. This show was atrocious. This is a show that hates Scooby Doo.
    ellauri264.html on line 186: High Hashem—sealed this little jar of oil and gave it to Abraham as a gift. Abraham, in turn,
    ellauri264.html on line 189: these jars was the oil from Noah's ark. Jacob prophetically hid this oil at the site of the Holy
    ellauri264.html on line 190: Temple and laid the foundations for the miracle of Chanuka. This is the oil that originated
    ellauri264.html on line 194: The basis for Jacob‟s action becomes clearer when one examines his worldview. Jacob
    ellauri264.html on line 195: understood that everything in our possession comes from G-d, has a specific purpose and must be used to its full potential. Elaborating on this, Rabbi Zadok HaKohen Rabinowitz (of 19th century Poland) teaches that the righteous
    ellauri264.html on line 197: “do not take more than is destined for them from Hashem… That which is not created for this specific person is like stolen property when they are in possession of it, and thus [the righteous are careful] not to take possession of it. Conversely, property that is assigned to and created for them is very precious to them—so much so that our patriarch Jacob risked his life for his property. Thus ...it was said in the name of the Yehudi Hakadosh: a righteous person is obligated to enjoy an object which is fitting for him even if it means risking his life. That is why Jacob-- who knew that the small vessels were his, appropriated by him, and created for him—risked his life to save them.”


    ellauri264.html on line 201: Jacob‟s example of valuing his possessions presents a particular challenge to us living in a modern, “disposable” age. Recognizing this trend, in 1955, the retailing analyst Victor Lebow highlighted a trend in consumer society, away from greater mindfulness regarding possessions and toward a more short-term view.
    ellauri264.html on line 209: To make a long story short-- Victor Lebow was a prophet. He has been slandered by all who have used this infamous quote to paint him as a cheerleader for consumerism when in fact he was one of the first-- if not the first-- to see the future implications of its corrosive influence. The fact that so many people, organizations, and websites have used his quote completely out of context and nearly all got the quote from the SAME source should give people GREAT pause-- and should be an object lesson in scholarship for progressive people. Don't believe everything you read. And don't write articles or create websites using materials you haven't primary sourced, either.
    ellauri264.html on line 221: „Our enormously productive economy demands that we make consumption our way of life, that we convert the buying and use of goods into rituals, that we seek our spiritual satisfactions, our ego satisfactions, in consumption. The measure of social status, of social acceptance, of prestige, is now to be found in our consumptive patterns. The very meaning and significance of our lives today expressed in consumptive terms. The greater the pressures upon the individual to conform to safe and accepted social standards, the more does he tend to express his aspirations and his individuality in terms of what he wears, drives, eats- his home, his car, his pattern of food serving, his hobbies.
    ellauri264.html on line 224: BTW, I disagree with those comments which have suggested that Lebow was some kind of “prophet” warning about the dangers of commodity consumption. This is nonsense - even Marx wrote about the problems of “commodity fetishism” in his 1867 book, “Das Kapital”.
    ellauri264.html on line 236: with possessions. At this time of giving and receiving things, we can re-evaluate our relationship to possessions and look for less wasteful ways to use the resources of the earth. For example, instead of buying and giving new gifts, we might consider more renewable ways of gift giving, like sharing books, trading old toys with our neighbors, wrapping gifts in old newspapers, or giving gifts of charity in honor of loved ones.
    ellauri264.html on line 239: Olive oil is bio-fuel, a renewable resource: the olive tree will produce another crop of crap every year, as will the palm oil palm. According to Jewish law, olive oil lamps are the ideal Lighting with olive oil can help us connect to the holy use of our resources, from the renewable olive oil of the Hasmonians back to the oil vessels of Jacob and Noah. This year, may our Chanuka lights inspire us toward responsible and holy use of everything that comes into our possession by hook or crook.
    ellauri264.html on line 398: Pattis is currently representing one of several members of the Proud Boys extremist group charged criminally in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in a trial in Washington that is underway. It wasn’t immediately clear how his suspension would affect the case. Pattis said he has notified the judge in Washington of the discipline.
    ellauri264.html on line 400: Samainen Norm puolusti alt right salaliitto"teoreetikkoa" Alex Jonesia kun se ize pantiin viralta. Jones has provided a platform and support for white nationalists, giving Unite the Right rally attendee and white supremacist Nick Fuentes a platform on his website Banned.Video, as well as serving as a potential "entry point" to their ideology. Jones, meanwhile, faced a lawsuit filed by families of the Sandy Hook victims alleging he and others defamed them by falsely claiming the shootings were a hoax to justify further gun control, subjecting them to ongoing harassment and threats.
    ellauri264.html on line 402: During a hearing in August over possible discipline for the records release, Pattis invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions. In a court filing, he said there was no proof he violated any conduct rules and called the records release an "innocent mistake." Karsea perse joka sai mitä ansaizi, tai edes osan siitä.
    ellauri264.html on line 409: Extreme right radio station WICC programme director Adam Lambetti told The Independent in a statement: “Norm Pattis is no longer with WICC, but we wish him well in the future.” On Wednesday, a jury reached a staggering $965m damages award against Mr Jones for the emotional and financial harm he had caused to 15 Sandy Hook family members and an FBI officer who attended the shooting in 2012. Afterwards, Mr Pattis admitted he got his “arse kicked”. “It was great fun while it lasted,” Mr Pattis said, who describes himself in an online bio as a “lawyer, writer, contrarian, stand-up comedian”.
    ellauri264.html on line 415: Norm was seen rambling about Black Lives Matter and making homophobic and racist remarks, using the "n" word with his pants around his ankles (he was wearing soiled shorts underneath). A Black woman sitting in the front row stares at Pattis throughout the nearly eight-minute set, clearly unimpressed. This past year he infuriated the New Haven National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, a former ally, by posting a racially charged meme on his Facebook page. The post depicted three hooded white beer cans arrayed around a brown bottle hanging from a string. Its caption: “Ku Klux Coors.” Civil rights activists called it disgusting and racist. Pattis called it funny and free speech.
    ellauri264.html on line 422:

    Norm founded and leads The Law Firm in 2005, Connecticut-based criminal defense and civil rights. It focuses on serious felonies including violent felonies, white-collar crimes, sex offenses, drug crimes, and misconduct by lawyers, doctors, and government officials. Norm has defended capital murder cases and won federal civil rights verdicts for police brutality, discrimination, false arrest, malicious prosecution, and violations of rights, always on the side of the criminal. Norm Pattis is veteran of more than 100 successful jury trials, many resulting in acquittals for people charged with serious crimes, multi million dollar civil rights and discrimination verdicts, and successful criminal appeals. The Hartford Courant describes his work as “Brilliant” and “Audacious”.
    ellauri264.html on line 426: Nenästä ja ammatista huolimatta Pattis ei välttämättä ole jutku, nimestä päätellen se voisi olla myös paki tai mafioso. No ei se onkin ... Hungarian! Ei vaitiskaan vaan Esko Kreetalta. Pattis was born in Chicago in 1955 to a mother of French-Canadian descent and a father who had immigrated from the Greek island of Crete. One day when Pattis was 6 or 7, his father left the house and never came back. Pattis says that the abandonment haunts him to this day.
    ellauri264.html on line 429: Pattis käänsi takkinsa vasemmalta äärioikealle käden käänteessä. Jos saat paskaa käteen siitä pääsee käden käänteessä. But behind the hardball tactics, ferocious reputation and slashing rhetoric, another side of Pattis lurks. He’s a deep thinker who devours books in a constant quest for enlightenment and self-improvement. His idea of Disneyland is attending the annual Hay Festival of Ideas in Wales, which has been described as “the Woodstock of the Mind.” Get into a serious conversation with Pattis, and he will bounce from philosopher to philosopher as casually as some men bounce from ballplayer to ballplayer. During an interview for this article, Pattis quoted or referenced thinker Immanuel Kant, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, St. Augustine, the New Testament, Machiavelli and Kurt Vonnegut all in one 3-minute stretch. What a pile of turds.
    ellauri264.html on line 435: Years later, in his 40s, Pattis reconnected with his dad, who told him he had been a career criminal in Detroit specializing in payroll heists and fled to Chicago after shooting a man. Rikos oli Normin porukoilla verissä.
    ellauri264.html on line 437: when his mother took up with a violent alcoholic who detested him. Pattis
    ellauri264.html on line 438: suddenly found himself unwelcome in his own home and would only return
    ellauri264.html on line 439: after his mother and the man went to bed. At one point, he tried sleeping
    ellauri264.html on line 440: in the woods, only to get extremely sick. It is those two traumatizing experiences — abandonment and being unwelcome and loathed in his own home — that drive him, Pattis says.
    ellauri264.html on line 442: From an early age, Pattis says he has felt a burning desire to know God personally. To that end, he spent time in Switzerland at the compound of an American Christian fundamentalist thinker named Francis Schaeffer and then inveigled himself in the graduate philosophy program of Columbia University, where he studied and taught for six years. At one point, he nearly joined the CIA, but that opportunity fizzled when the agency didn’t like his polygraph answers about homosexual experiences. “I said, ‘Well, I haven’t had any yet. I don’t know how I’m going to respond if you ask,’ ” he recalls. “I think they decided that was a little too much for them.”
    ellauri264.html on line 461: Beyond this place of wrath and tears Tän kiukun ja kyyneleiden paikan takana
    ellauri264.html on line 462: Looms but the Horror of the shade, Kuikkii vaan varjon kauhistus,
    ellauri264.html on line 475: Born in Gloucester, England, poet, editor, and critic William Ernest Henley was educated at Crypto Grammar School, where he studied with the poet T.E. Brown, and with the University of St. Andrews. His father was a struggling bookseller who died when Henley was a teenager. At age 12 Henley was diagnosed with tubercular arthritis that necessitated the amputation of one of his legs just below the knee; the other foot was saved only through a radical surgery performed by Joseph Lister. As he healed in the infirmary, Henley began to write poems, including “Invictus,” which concludes with the oft-referenced lines “I am the master of my fate; / I am the captain of my soul.” Henley’s poems often engage themes of inner strength and perseverance. His numerous collections of poetry include A Book of Verses (1888), London Voluntaries (1893), and Hawthorn and Lavender (1899).
    ellauri264.html on line 477: Henley edited the Scots Observer (which later became the National Observer), through which he befriended writer Rudyard Kipling, and the Magazine of Art, in which he lauded the work of emerging artists James McNeill Whistler and Auguste Rodin. Henley was a close friend of Robert Louis Stevenson, who reportedly based his Long John Silver character in Treasure Island in part on Henley.
    ellauri264.html on line 488:

    “Me, exploited? By this pixie?”

    ellauri264.html on line 492: Ladies and Gentlemen: There are five hundred reasons why I began to write for children, but to save time I will mention only ten of them. Number 1) Children read books, not reviews. They don’t give a hoot about the critics. Number 2) Children don’t read to find their identity. Number 3) They don’t read to free themselves of guilt, to quench the thirst for rebellion, or to get rid of alienation. Number 4) They have no use for psychology. Number 5) They detest sociology. Number 6) They don’t try to understand Kafka or Finnegans Wake. Number 7) They still believe in God, the family, angels, devils, witches, goblins, logic, clarity, punctuation, and other such obsolete stuff. Number 8) They love interesting stories, not commentary, guides, or footnotes. Number 9) When a book is boring, they yawn openly, without any shame or fear of authority. Number 10) They don’t expect their beloved writer to redeem humanity. Young as they are, they know that it is not in his power. Only the adults have such childish illusions.
    ellauri264.html on line 501: Naisiin menevä Iisakki epäilee ettei se välttämättä pysty seuraamaan joka ikistä Sulkhan Arukhin pykälää. Ja miettii mahtaakohan Jehovakaan niistä kaikista yhtä paljon perustaa. In transferring her loyalty to Isaac, Alma also bore his infidelities, which included a regular mistress and a number of casual ones. But as Hertz pointed out, the patriarchs did just the same, and were none the worse for it in Jehova´s estimate.
    ellauri264.html on line 503: Sulkhan Arukhista on aiempi maininta konservatiivisen Rabbi Smallin kohdalla albumissa 233. Se oli halakha-lakikirjpista ensimmäinen Anachronim tai sit viimeinen Rishonim. Siinä saumalla.
    ellauri264.html on line 509: The halachic rulings in the Shulchan Aruch generally follow Sephardic law and customs, whereas Ashkenazi Jews generally follow the halachic rulings of Moses Isserles, whose glosses to the Shulchan Aruch note where the Sephardic and Ashkenazi customs differ. These glosses are widely referred to as the mappah (literally: the "tablecloth") to the Shulchan Aruch´s "Set Table". Almost all published editions of the Shulchan Aruch include this gloss, and the term "Shulchan Aruch" has come to denote both Karo's work as well as Isserles', with Karo usually referred to as "the mechaber" ("author") and Isserles as "the Rema" (an acronym of Rabbi Moshe Isserles).
    ellauri264.html on line 525: Karo adopted the Halakhot of Rabbi Isaac Alfasi (the Rif), Maimonides (the Rambam), and Asher ben Jehiel (the Rosh) as his standards, accepting as authoritative the opinion of two of the three, except in cases where most of the ancient authorities were against them or in cases where there was already an accepted custom contrary to his ruling.
    ellauri264.html on line 532: The "Rema" (Moses Isserles) started writing his commentary on the Arba´ah Turim, Darkhei Moshe, at about the same time as Yosef Karo. Karo finished his work "Bet Yosef" first, and it was first presented to the Rema as a gift from one of his students. Upon receiving the gift, the Rema could not understand how he had spent so many years unaware of Karo´s efforts. After looking through the Bet Yosef, the Rema realized that Karo had mainly relied upon Sephardic poskim.
    ellauri264.html on line 534: In place of Karo´s three standard authorities, Isserles cites "the later authorities" (chiefly based on the works of Yaakov Moelin, Israel Isserlein and Israel Bruna, together with the Franco-German Tosafists) as criteria of opinion. While the Rosh on many occasions based his decision on these sources, Isserles gave them more prominence in developing practical legal rulings. By incorporating these other opinions, Isserles actually addressed some major criticisms regarding what many viewed as the arbitrary selection of the three authorities upon whose opinions Karo based his work.
    ellauri264.html on line 536: After realizing this, the Rema shortened his work on the Tur, entitled Darkhei Moshe, to focus only on rulings which differ from Bet Yosef.
    ellauri264.html on line 538: The halachic rulings in the Shulchan Aruch generally follow the Sephardic custom. The Rema added his glosses and published them as a commentary on the Shulchan Aruch, specifying whenever the Sephardic and Ashkenazic customs differ. These glosses are sometimes referred to as the mappah, literally, the 'tablecloth,' to the Shulchan Aruch´s 'Set Table.' Almost all published editions of the Shulchan Aruch include this gloss.
    ellauri264.html on line 540: The importance of the minhag ("prevailing local custom") is also a point of dispute between Karo and Isserles: while Karo held fast to original authorities and material reasons, Isserles considered the minhag as an object of great importance, and not to be omitted in a codex. This point, especially, induced Isserles to write his glosses to the Shulchan Aruch, that the customs (minhagim) of the Ashkenazim might be recognized, and not be set aside through Karo´s reputation.
    ellauri264.html on line 542: The author himself had no very high opinion of the work, remarking that he had written it chiefly for "young students". He never refers to it in his responsa, but always to the Beit Yosef. The Shulchan Aruch achieved its reputation and popularity not only against the wishes of the author, but, perhaps, through the very scholars who criticized it.
    ellauri264.html on line 550: I know that if I eat a large amount of cake and cookies, I am required to wash netilas yadayim, recite Hamotzi and conclude the meal with Birkas Hamozon. This is because cake is normally eaten as a snack, and for that reason it has a lower-level set of berochos than bread. If, however, I consume a large amount of cake (known in halacha as kivias seudah), the cake is treated like bread and not a snack, and the brochos are the same as those recited at a bread meal. Is the same true of doughnuts? If I eat a full meal of doughnuts, must I wash, say Hamotzi and Birkas Hamozon?
    ellauri264.html on line 554: The Mishna (Berachos 51b) relates that after eating bread, one must belch before the bread is digested. This time frame is known as "k´dei ichul" (the time it takes for digestion to occur.) How does a person know if digestion occurred?
    ellauri264.html on line 567: The law applies only to foods which, according to the Talmud, are "fit for a king's table" and are not generally eaten raw. Foods which would not be served at a state dinner are exempt from bishul akum, and are kosher even if cooked totally by non-Jews, provided that all the other requirements of kosher food are met. Maimonides explains that this prohibition was originally decreed in order to avoid a Jew being invited over by a non-Jew for a meal (which may lead to intermarriage), and people do not invite each other for dinner over food which is not "fit for a King's table" (Maimonides, Ma´akhalot Asurot 17:15).
    ellauri264.html on line 574: In the biblical narrative, Hophni and Phinehas are criticised for engaging in illicit behaviour, such as appropriating the best portion of sacrifices for themselves, and having sexual relations with the sanctuary's serving women. They are described as "sons of Belial" in (1 Samuel 2:12) KJV, "corrupt" in the New King James Version, or "scoundrels" in the NIV. Dom var usla som Sveriges krona, som än kallas skräpvaluta, än skitvaluta. Their misdeeds provoked the wrath of Yahweh and led to a divine curse being put on the house of Eli, and they subsequently both died on the same day, when Israel was defeated by the Philistines at the Battle of Aphek near Ebenezer; the news of this defeat then led to Eli's death (1 Samuel 4:17–18). On hearing of the deaths of Eli and Phinehas, and of the capture of the ark, Phinehas´ wife gave birth to a son whom she named Zaphod (expressing 'departed glory') before she herself died (1 Samuel 4:19–22).
    ellauri264.html on line 576: Eli’s sons were scoundrels; they had no regard for the Lord. Now it was the practice of the priests that, whenever any of the people offered a sacrifice, the priest’s servant would come with a three-pronged fork in his hand while the meat was being boiled and would plunge the fork into the pan or kettle or caldron or pot. Whatever the fork brought up the priest would take for himself. This is how they treated all the Israelites who came to Shiloh. But even before the fat was burned, the priest’s servant would come and say to the person who was sacrificing, “Give the priest some meat to roast; he won’t accept boiled meat from you, but only raw.”
    ellauri264.html on line 579: 17 This sin of the young men was very great in the Lord’s sight, for they were treating the Lord’s offering with contempt.
    ellauri264.html on line 581: Now Eli, who was very old, heard about everything his sons were doing to all Israel and how they slept with the women who served at the entrance to the tent of meeting. 23 So he said to them, “Why the fuck do you do such things? I hear from all the people about these wicked deeds of yours. 24 No, my sons; the report I hear spreading among the Lord’s people is not good. 25 If one person sins against another, God may mediate for the offender; but if anyone sins against the Lord, who will intercede for them? Oh Jesus.” His sons, however, did not listen to their father’s rebuke, for it was the Lord’s will to put them to death, willy nilly.
    ellauri264.html on line 586: 18 When he mentioned the ark of God, Eli fell backward off his chair by the side of the gate. His neck was broken and he died, for he was an old man, and he was heavy. He had led Israel forty years and here was the thanks.
    ellauri264.html on line 593: Israel ilmoitti viime sunnuntaina aikovansa laillistaa yhdeksän siirtokuntaa ja rakentavansa 10 000 uutta kotia siirtokuntalaisille. Palestiinalaisalueille perustetut siirtokunnat ovat kansainvälisen oikeuden mukaan laittomia. Mutta halakhan mukaan ne ovat A-okay, just what the doctor ordered, the cat´s whiskers.
    ellauri264.html on line 595: The rise of Religious Zionism is a phenomenon that has taken place since the times six day war. One of its key founders was a man called Rabbi Kuk who was the head of the yeshiva Mercaz HaRav in Jerusalem. He was one of the first practically envision the settlement of the mountains of Israel in modern times. An example of his thinking in this regard can be seen in a speech he made just before the six day war. These were his words:
    ellauri264.html on line 615: "Vi lever i en hård ekonomisk verklighet och detta är lösningen som folk har väntat på. Aldrig tidigare i historien har vi sett en sådan här fantastisk möjlighet för vanligt folk att kunna generera enorma rikedomar på så kort tid.
    ellauri264.html on line 677: Steve Jobs did a phone prank to an Apple fan boy who applied for the Apple CEO position and told him that he had been chosen, later to tell him if he showed up at Cupertino that the cops would arrest him. Steve Jobs refused child support for his daughter Lisa. But he was 20 years old by then, not excusing what he did though. He later made good and Lisa choose to live with him instead of her mother. Steve did many things wrong as a 20 something. But The Original Macintosh (folklore . org) has a lot of stories that show him as a Crusty the Clown, playing pranks with the team, breaking into his own office as he locked his keys inside. Putting a pirate flag on a building. How funny.
    ellauri264.html on line 679: Definitely one of the darkest stories about Steve Jobs has to be the Breakout story. In the 1970’s, Steve Jobs was working for Atari, designing the game Breakout. Overwhelmed with work with a deadline quickly approaching, he approached Steve Wozniak for help in finishing his project within the next four days. In exchange for his help, Jobs offered Woz half of what he was earning, which he said was $700. For four days, Jobs and Wozniak worked day and night without sleep. When they were done, they were sick with mono and exhausted, but they finished the project before the deadline. Wozniak got his… (more)
    ellauri264.html on line 681: Mark pretty much stole facebook from his friends, plain and simple, got rid of people when they were no longer needed by him. Has been ordered again and again to pay huge sums to people after settling in court.
    ellauri264.html on line 687: They are dicks, so they are the people who will end up in history books. They have all made technology so that they own it today. The world is a much worse place because they are/were here. You could even argue that because they were dicks, did not care if they walked over other people, that’s why they have all the nice things they have now.
    ellauri264.html on line 689: If you want the opposite (pretty much), have a look at Antonio Mucci, Visicalc, Dan Bricklin and Bob Frankston, by all accounts super nice people, treated everyone great, just all around nice nerds, they were trounced, not many people alive today who know who they are (yes they are both alive as I type this). A guy just took their idea, made his own version and had a ready version when the IBM PC was introduced.
    ellauri264.html on line 691: So this is what´s common between Graham Bell, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs , Mark Zuckerberg and Ray Kroc: All of them have managed to steal something very valuable from somebody and make it work for them. Steve Jobs brought the idea of mouse from Xerox and Bill Gates copied the entire idea from Steve Jobs Mark Zuckerberg stole the idea from Winklewoss brothers and published as his own.
    ellauri264.html on line 694: This is when the philosophy of Niccolo Machiavelli, a 16th-century Florentine political thinker with powerful advice for nice people who don’t get very far about , comes in. Machiavelli’s Advice for Nice Guys: Machiavelli noted a central, uncomfortable observation: that the wicked tend to win. And they do so because they have a huge advantage over the good: they are willing to act with the darkest ingenuity and cunning to further their cause. They are not held back by those rigid opponents of change: principles. They will be prepared to outright lie, twist facts, threaten or ge… (more)
    ellauri264.html on line 696: Ray Kroc stole McDonald’s from the original owners who were brothers and intentionally breached the franchising contract he signed with them. He then went on to publicly claim to be the owner, called his restaurant McDonald’s one when it wasn’t.
    ellauri264.html on line 702: Steve Jobs is known to all as the founder of Apple, known to fewer as a ruthless man who squeezed and burned many bridges with his friends and employees and even known to fewer as a man who chose to become the “bad man”/Devil´s Advocate. But - get this! Steve would wait in line in the Apple cafeteria like everyone else. He could have easily gone to the front of any line, or have someone get food for him. But he didn’t. On a number of occasions, he ended up in line behind me. And often he would ask me to ‘hold his place’ while he went to check other food stations.
    ellauri264.html on line 704: Perhaps the person who knew him best was his long-time friend Steve Wozinak. Ironically, even he wasn´t spared from being manipulated by Jobs. In the early days, he was asked to work on a game with Jobs with half of the total payment as his cut. Upon completion, he received $350 of $700 but Jobs had actually earned $5000 for the project.
    ellauri264.html on line 706: Jobs We all know was a dick. From refusing to acknowledge Lisa was his daughter to refusing her mother child support. We all know he ripped off Wozniak many times. Including early in their career.
    ellauri264.html on line 708: Gates was a nerdy bully who forced his bundled operating system down everyone´s throats. Then made threats against competitors who tried avoiding his monopoly. Had some shady stock dealings that went against his sick partner, Allen who was battling cancer at the time.
    ellauri264.html on line 731: Neuvostoliiton hallitus julisti alueen juutalaisten kansalliseksi alueeksi 1928. Se oli tarkoitettu Neuvostoliiton juutalaisille, vaikka juutalaisilla ei ollut minkäänlaista historiallista yhteyttä alueeseen. Siitä tuli luvattu maa vasta Stalinin ansiosta. Siunatut olkoot hänen kätösensä. Piirikunnasta tuli autonominen alue 7. toukokuuta 1934. Juutalaisten autonomisen alueen asukasluku vuonna 2010 oli 176 600 ja väestötiheys 4,9 as./km². Väkiluku on laskussa. Väestö on keskittynyt Siperian radan varrelle alueen pohjoisosaan.
    ellauri264.html on line 742: Tämä ensin syrjitty Leea vaimo sai kuitenkin ensin neljä poikaa Jaakobin kanssa, mutta sen jälkeen hän oli lakannut synnyttämästä ja hän teki toisen vaimon Raakelin kanssa sopimuksen, että jos hän antaa Alruuna-kasvista tuotetut lemmenmarjat Raakelille, niin hän saisi tehdä vielä yhden pojan Jaakobin kanssa ja tästä viidennestä pojasta tuli Isaskar. Luku viisi kuvaa paholaisen hyökkäystä, mutta myös armoa, ja nämä kuvaavatkin Suomen historiaa hyvin, joka on ollut täynnä hyökkäyksiä ja suurta armoa universumin Luojalta ja Lutherilta.
    ellauri264.html on line 755: Ja tämä aasi sijoittaa itsensä levolliseen ja ihanaan maahan kahden rajan välille. Nämä kaksi rajaa kuvaavat länttä (Natoa) ja itää (Venäjää) ja läpi Suomen historian Suomi on ollut lännen ja idän välisien kiistojen välikappaleena, josta on syntynyt jopa oma termi suomettuminen 2.0, tarkoittaen turkkilaisten nuoleskelua.
    ellauri264.html on line 757: Se, että aasilla on taakka selässään ja hän on veronalainen palvelija kuvaa sitä, että Suomi on joutunut monesti maksumieheksi vieraalle sitä hallineella suurelle vallalla historian aikana, kuten Ruotsille, Venäjälle ja viimeisenä Euroopan unionille, jolle Suomi on joutunut maksamaan veroa tai jäsenmaksua. EU komissio arvioi myös hiljattain raportissaan, että Suomi kuuliaisimpia veronmaksajia.
    ellauri266.html on line 46: Sopulien tavoin ihmiskunta on jäämeren lämpimällä partaalla. Izemurha ei ole ehkä tarkoitus, mutta kiusallinen sivuvaikutus. Historia osoittaa, ettei ihmiskunta opi katastrofeista, vaan viettää aikansa toipumalla niistä. Epäilemättä historia toistaa izeään. Tuntuu siltä, että voi kysyä, kuinka mielettömäxi aappalauma saattaa tulla. Järkevästi ajatellen ei rakennettaisi maailmaa, jossa ruoka ja vesi saastuvat, lapset kuolevat ja vahingoitttuvat, ja koko elinympäristö päivä päivältä muuttuu epämiellyttävämmäxi kaikille aisteille. Syynä tähän ei ole epäonnistuminen, vaan onnistuminen, niin sanottu edistys. Lisäännytäänpä ja täytetäänpä maa! Se on mukavaa! Nirs nars, ruis ruis. (Tämä oli siis Tuomiopäivä-kirjan loppukaneetti sukupolvi sitten. Eipä ole tilanne paljon muuttunut, ei parempaan päin ainakaan.)
    ellauri266.html on line 56: Desmond Morris was a scandal when his 1967 book appeared on human sociobiology. Some of Morris's theories have been criticized as untestable. For instance, geneticist Adam Rutherford writes that Morris commits "the scientific sin of the 'just-so' story – speculation that sounds appealing but cannot be tested or is devoid of evidence". However, this is also a criticism of adaptationism in evolutionary biology, not just of Morris.
    ellauri266.html on line 58: Rutherford (1975), who is half-Guyanese Indian, was born in Ipswich in the East of England and attended Ipswich School. His game is not football like Morris's but cricket. Rutherford was the podcast editor for the journal Nature for a while. He wrote a blog covering his thoughts when reading Charles Darwin's blockbuster On the Origin of Species. Adam is something of a cross between David Attenboro and Uncle Sam.
    ellauri266.html on line 60: He also writes disparagingly on religion in Guardian (spare £2 for an ex-leper), notably on his experience participating in the Alpha course. The Alpha course is an evangelistic course which seeks to introduce the basics of the Christian faith through a series of talks and discussions. It is described by its organisers as "an opportunity to explore the meaning of simian life in just 24h." Adam did not buy it, but went on to live in original sin. Besides, he is in all likelihood a Sitzpinkler, i.e. a wuss.
    ellauri266.html on line 64: Adam Rutherford has not revealed much of her (!) bio. So, his early life and details of his parents are still behind curtains. Adam Rutherford seems happily married to his wife. However, he has not disclosed the details of his wife. Nevertheless, Adam has shared many things about his family through his social media. Adam is the father of three children, one son, and two daughters. Adam Rutherford is well-known for founding the scientific publication Nature. He has hosted many BBC television shows, including Me Playing God and The Gene Kelly Code. He is probably living an economically comfortable life. His passion for music allows him to escape the rigours of science and enjoy the emotional side of life. His net worth as a simian is as yet undisclosed. He may be having a fling with his co-star Hannah Fry, as well as with her namesake Stephen Fry. Stephen is not the only Fry on the block anymore, but there is no evidence showing that these two are related. In fact, they don't even follow each other on social media!
    ellauri266.html on line 69: Morris is also criticized for stating that gender roles have a deep evolutionary rather than cultural background. True or false, it is completely non-woke currently. Uncle Sam is not a fan of woke, he thinks it narrows his freedom of speech. Koiraiden ja naaraiden tasa-arvoa edistänee tällä haavaa se, että miehet kasvattavat wiixiä ja naiset ajavat ne pois.
    ellauri266.html on line 81: his-remaining-Congo-painting-Split-Fan-Pattern-with-Central-Black-Spot-1957-1024x764.jpeg" width="50%" />
    ellauri266.html on line 108: Yksi kilpailun menestyneimmistä maista 2000-luvulla, yhteensä kymmenen viiden parhaan sijoituksen kanssa, Venäjä sijoittui toiseksi Alsoun kanssa vuonna 2000, Dima Bilanin kanssa vuonna 2006, Kirka Babushkinin vuonna 2012 ja Polina Gagarinan vuonna 2015; kolmannexi tATun kanssa vuonna 2003, Serebroa tuli 2007, Sergei Lavrov voitti vuosina 2016 ja 2019 ja oli viides Dina Garipovan kanssa vuonna 2013. Vuonna 2017 ja 2018 he eivät päässeet finaaliin ensimmäistä kertaa historiansa aikana. Annit eivät pääseet finaaliin silti yhtään entistä paremmin.
    ellauri266.html on line 172: Hekabe (altgriechisch Ἑκάβη Hekábē), auch Hekuba (lateinisch Hecuba) oder Cisseis, war eine Tochter des phrygischen Königs Dymas und in Homers Ilias als Gattin des Priamos die sechste und letzte Königin von Troja.
    ellauri266.html on line 200: Virpi Hämeen-Anttila (s. 15.10.1958 Espoossa) valmistui Helsingin yliopistosta filosofian maisteriksi vuonna 1996. Hän teki väitöskirjan vanhan intialaisen kertomakirjallisuuden teoriasta. Hämeen-Anttila on toiminut opettajana Helsingin yliopistossa vuodesta 1987 opetusaloinaan sanskritin kieli sekä Intian kirjallisuus, historia, filosofia ja kulttuurihistoria.
    ellauri266.html on line 217: Pieni paxu aviomies Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila asuu Edinburghissa. Perheeseen kuuluu myös kaksi aikuista lasta. Kun Virpi nykyään astuu kotiovesta sisään, vastassa on hiljaisuus. Lapset muuttivat pois muutamia vuosia sitten. Heidän varhainen itsenäistymisensä lukioikäisinä yllätti, molemmat kun olivat kotona viihtyvää sorttia aina kun vanhemmat oli liesussa. Vajaa vuosi sitten myös Virpin aviomies, islamin tutkija Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila muutti Edinburghiin, hän sai zägällä professuurin paikallisesta yliopistosta. Minulta kysytään jatkuvasti, onko tämä nyt hirveä kriisi. Mutta kun olemme olleet 34 vuotta naimisissa, niin kyllä me tällaisen "väliaikaisen" eron (7v tähän mennessä) kestämme nykyteknologian aikakautena. Nyt kun en voi riehua ja räyhätä Jaakolle aamu-Hesarin äärellä, olen huomannut marmattavani hänestä herkästi Suomi 24 palstalla. Näytän kai jonkinlaiselta höpönassulta, kun ihmiset suorastaan hyökkäävät kimppuuni, jos haluavat jotain. Jaakko on onneksi ollut minulle hyvä roolimalli. Hän osaa olla hyvin tiukka, jopa häikäilemättömän suorasanainen ihmisille, jotka haluavat häneltä jotain, johon hän ei ole valmis. Hän on oikeastaan tarkemmin ajatellen aivan hirveä pieni paskiainen. Hyvä että lähti.
    ellauri266.html on line 238: Ahdistusta lisäsi isä, joka dominoi perhettä saatuaan tietää, ettei hänen isänsä olekaan hänen oikea isänsä.  Se oli jatkuvaa huutoa ja karjumista (niinkuin muuten meilläkin kotona), mutta ei isäni hullu ollut, hän oli vain traumatisoitunut.  En pelkää putoamista kun kiipeilen seinille, mutta hulluksi tulemista ensin pelkäsin, Virpi sanoo. Masennuksesta ja bulimiasta toivuttuaan Virpi kohtasi tulevan puolisonsa Jaakko Hämeen-Anttilan, joka on tällä hetkellä Edinburghissa professorina. He saivat kaksi lasta. Siitoxet olivat Virpille juhlaa: kas, keho toimiikin moitteettomasti. Jaakolta olen saanut vain ehdotonta hyväksyntää. Hänelle olen sama ihminen kaikissa painoissa, Virpi tietää. Ei hänkään hyljexi sylttyä eikä lasiin sylje. Ei hän näe minussa ennen kaikkea paksut pohkeet, leveän lantion, litteän takapuolen ja epätasaisen ihon. (Varhaisempaa paasausta tästä mieltäkääntävästä aiheesta mm. albumissa 27.)
    ellauri266.html on line 254: This movie should never have been made. It is a love ode to irresponsible broken men, our nation's need for lunatic asylums, and the failure of Child Protective Services. The producer's mother must have written the rest of the reviews.
    ellauri266.html on line 256: Knew nothing about the characters. Nothing made sense. Nothing was believable. Ending was awful and left me and my wife in shock as to what we even watched. The movie was dragged out and extremely boring. I was not inspired and got nothing out of this movie. The acting was good however, but the story was one of the worst. If I got to come up with my own assumptions, then you did something wrong.
    ellauri266.html on line 258: An absolute thrill ride that left me cold, lonely, bored to tears, depressed and devoid of all goals and ambition. If only it was on VHS, at least then I could have strangled myself with the tape. If you find this entertaining then I suggest a tin of plum tomatoes poured on to your living room floor. That way you can waste far more time watching them go rotten!
    ellauri266.html on line 262: In a world of superhero movies, this film stands out and reminds you of what the art of filmmaking is all about. No explosions, gunfights, or unnecessary sexual content, simply a group of phenomenal actors. The story is both sad and uplifting and it says more about PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) than any film I've seen in years. The fact that this film was so underappreciated is an indictment of the viewing public.
    ellauri266.html on line 266: What was the point in this film? You have no idea why or what actually happens. The young actress is very good but the film shite.
    ellauri266.html on line 268: Are people insane? Like honestly. Are the people who reviewed this movie certifiably insane? This movie got 100%?????????? How. Like really, howwwww??? The most boring, slowest, most depressing movies ever. The only movie worse than this was Marley & Me. If this movie was based on a true story, then ok. But this was just a made up sad story? Like why? It does not deserve a 100% score AT ALL! That's just absurd and outrageous. And it now calls every score into question. Simply insane.
    ellauri266.html on line 274: Psh. Unreal. Watched this movie in hopes of some type of entertainment but it was just a dude and his daughter walking through the woods for 2 hours. Unreal. Pppshhhh
    ellauri266.html on line 280: Wow talk about about fake news or breaking not so breaking news we got suckered into watching this because big tomatoes said 100% a plus rating. I'm not sure if we are talking about the same film because this movie is the type that makes you keep checking your phone hoping someone has texted you with something interesting. Wish they had a money back guarantee.
    ellauri266.html on line 284: Awful father. There is no ending, the father knows he has issues, but he doesn't get help. He refuses to get on with his life and is stubbornly stuck in the past. His character development doesn't exist.He is useless. I'm both glad and relieved that the daughter chooses to better herself and her situation.
    ellauri266.html on line 292: This was the dumbest movie ever. There is no explaination to anything and it just feels like youre waiting for something to happen but it never does. The story line was barely there. DO NOT RECOMMEND
    ellauri266.html on line 296: I signed up for rotten tomatoes today specifically to rate this movie a ZERO. It was a complete waste of time. The movie is lax and boring. Characters are completely monotone throughout. I felt no empathy or emotion for any of the characters. It was a snooze fest.
    ellauri266.html on line 298: I would rather get beat up for 2 hours than watch this film, I kept waiting for something to happen or something that made me feel something, I sat there stone faced for 2 hours with no emotion assuming something must happen soon due to all these rave reviews, and then all of a sudden the credits show up on the screen and I realize i was hoodwinked by all of you writing good reviews. This film was an absolute snooze fest!
    ellauri266.html on line 304: This without a doubt the worst film I've ever watched. It goes absolutely no where throughout the movie.
    ellauri266.html on line 306: A great story, however when I invest 90 minutes of my life I expect entertainment that will take me to a place other than where I am. This simple was not entertaining. Please do not watch this terrible move. One other thing, why is there such a disparity between the critics and the viewers review.
    ellauri266.html on line 310: If you watch this movie and say it's "breathtaking" or "remarkable", you're the worlds biggest cuck.
    ellauri266.html on line 314: The movie was one of the worst I've ever seen. So many unanswered questions. Why did he keep moving? Where was his destination? I'm sorry but you don't just keep walking around forever. I don't. I'm a 100% disabled veteran from Iraq. I know about PTSD. The movie is annoying.
    ellauri266.html on line 316: If you like looking at trees, this may be your movie. I don't understand the complete lack of negative critic reviews here. Maybe it's my fault for being able to remember what it's like to watch truly well-directed films. Have today's critics forgotten what it's like to go see a film by Hitchcock or Wilder or even Blake Edwards or Ron Howard. Those guys knew how to tell a story. What we have here is a good example of bad storytelling.
    ellauri266.html on line 318: Really boring, slow and pointless film with virtually no plot. No idea why this got rated so highly by critics.
    ellauri266.html on line 325: General semantics, a philosophy of language-meaning that was developed by Alfred Korzybski (1879–1950), a Polish-American scholar, and furthered by S.I. Hayakawa, Wendell Johnson, and others; it is the study of language as a representation of reality. Korzybski’s theory was intended to improve the habits of glib upper-class response to hostile low-class environment. Drawing upon such varied disciplines as relativity theory, quantum mechanics, and mathematical logic, Korzybski and his followers sought a scientific, non-Aristotelian basis for clear understanding of the differences between symbol (word) and reality (referent) and the ways in which they themselves can influence (or manipulate) and limit other humans´ ability to think.
    ellauri266.html on line 329: This article was most recently revised and updated by Brian Duignan.
    ellauri266.html on line 333: For fertilization to take place, certain interindividual processes must take place: male and female must get each other´s attention, stimulate each other, secure each other´s cooperation or at least compliance, until the female (or male) finally assumes the appropriate position for receiving the sperm. This known as courtship. Mm, I´m getting the hots by just saying this. General semantics must surely have something to contribute to human sexuality. Mobility increases intelligence, that must be why the in-out moving human male is more intelligent than the female. The adult male is capable of being sexually aroused with or without provocation at practically any time. No wonder females prefer smelly company to no company at all. Except in a KZ lager they tend to lose interest, says Morris Gombinder in Shadows on the Hudson. Desmond Morris has an ingenious argument about the relation of a man´s sexuality to his way of life. "The naked ape is the sexiest man alive!", he says, and means it. "In baboons", he says, "the time from mounting to ejaculation is max 8 seconds, a goldfish´s attention span. Our ladies would never be satisfied with that!" Specialized organs such as lips, ear-lobes, nipples, breasts and genitals are richly endowed with things to lick and suck. Sorry folks, now I just have to take a break for a quick wank, I´m really gettting uncomfortably erect. Thank you. The sexually attractive parts are predominantly at the front, except the arse. Face-to-face sex is personalized sex, said the missionary. From the back you don´t really know who you are interacting with.
    ellauri266.html on line 335: Good communication is the key to good sexuality. How is it attained? Well television is a wonderful invenmtion, bringing the whole amazing world to our living room. Only you can´t interact with it (you can interact with yourself while watching, but it ain´t the same). A mobile phone is already way better, but clearly the best solution is an AI silicone playmate. One of the fascinating things that Eric Berne says in his famous book, Games People Play, is that we have 3 ego states, id, ego, and superego. Oops my bad, that was my esteemed colleague Freud a few decades earlier. But anyway.
    ellauri266.html on line 336: When man and woman giggle and play hide and seek with their genitals, they are like two ids. Yes it´s fun, but can they take the responsibility and the risk of a sperm entering an egg? What if, right after emptying his sperm sack into the hot and gluey tunnel he suddendly feels that - I´m too young, I´m not ready for it - there is still - I can´t... like the Leek King said after dozens of highly satisfying ejaculations into Jaina´s holiest of the holy? Good thinking Robin! We men get by with the piscine reproduction strategy, let the ladies feed their mammals with their mammaries as they please!
    ellauri266.html on line 340: If a young girl gets excited about mathematics or philosophy or sports car racing or anything else not specific defined as a legitimate female interest by Good Housekeeping Magazine, her elders smile among themselves and say, "She´ll soon get over all this nonsense when she has her own babies to take care of."
    ellauri266.html on line 344: Who knows perhaps one day these upper-class working women in teaching, in office jobs, in factories, in pubic services, are part of the answer to the lady from Oakland. As men become more accustomed to dealing with women colleagues and service staff, they will come to their senses and discuss with their partners sports events, the stock market, automobiles, politics, religion, philosophy, natural history, or science as they are waiting for their seed guns to reload. All the more enriched will be the relationship between them.
    ellauri266.html on line 347: At the end of her letter the lady adds, "My husband has just read this and he has a reply which may shed light on the male viewpoint. He said, ´You´re too pretty to be friends with. (He´s prejudiced.) He pursued this with, 'Why can´t you be more like a man.'"
    ellauri266.html on line 360: Throughout 1993, the role of NATO forces in Bosnia gradually grew. On February 28, 1994, the scope of NATO involvement in Bosnia increased dramatically. In an incident near Banja Luka, NATO fighters operating under Deny Flight shot down four Serb jets. This was the first combat operation in the history of NATO and opened the door for a steadily growing NATO presence in Bosnia. In April, the presence of NATO airpower continued to grow during a Serb attack on Goražde. In response, NATO launched its first close air support mission on April 10, 1994, bombing several Serb targets at the request of UN commanders.
    ellauri266.html on line 362: NATO continued its air operations over Bosnia in the first half of 1995. During this period, heroic American pilot Scott O´Grady was shot down over Bosnia by a surface-to-air missile fired by Bosnian Serb soldiers. He was eventually rescued safely, but his downing caused concern in the United States and other NATO countries about NATO air superiority in Bosnia and prompted some calls for more aggressive NATO action to eliminate Serb anti-air capabilities.
    ellauri266.html on line 380: Kuuluisemman tieteisluomuksensa lisäksi Boulle säilytti myöhemmissä tarinoissaan joitakin tieteisfiktiota: hänen vuoden 1966 romaaninsa Gardens on the Moon, joka seuraa kuvitteellista avaruuskilpailua, on vain yksi esimerkki. Hänen nimeään ei kuitenkaan voi erottaa apinoiden franchising-sopimuksesta, jonka luomisessa hän auttoi. Apinoiden planeetta on huomionarvoinen, koska se oli yksi menestyneimmistä tieteelokuvan esimerkeistä Star Wars -elokuvan julkaisuun asti vuonna 1977. Elokuvasarja auttaa leikkaamaan 1960-luvun ajankohtana, jolloin tieteiskirjallisuus erillisenä genrenä alkoi levitä ja tavoittaa valtavirran yleisön: ennen tätä aikaa genretarinoita oli suurelta osin aikakauslehdissä ja romaaneissa. 1960-luvun lopulla tämä oli muuttumassa: sarjat, kuten Star Trek, ja hampurilaisketju-sarjat, kuten Apinoiden planeetta esitteli laajemmalle yleisölle genretarinoita. Kun elokuva- ja katselutottumukset muuttuivat, tieteiskirjallisuus tuli yhä suositummaksi suuren yleisön keskuudessa.
    ellauri266.html on line 382: Sitten seurasivat Conquest of the Planet of the Apes vuonna 1972 ja Battle for the Planet of the Apes vuonna 1973. Kaksi jälkimmäistä elokuvaa kuvittelivat ensimmäisessä elokuvassa nähdyn planeetan nousun. Televisio-ohjelma seurasi vuonna 1974 ja toinen vuonna 1975, ennen kuin franchising suurelta osin päättyi. Muiden elokuvien jatkoromaaneihin osallistui muita Boullea apinoivia pellekirjailijoita kuten Michael Avallone, Jerry Pournelle, John Jakes ja David Gerrold, varhaisessa laajennetussa universumissa, jossa useat kirjailijat työskentelivät yhteisen projektin ja universumin parissa kuin apinat kirjoituskoneiden ääressä. Boulle pysyi yhteydessä elokuvien tuotantoon neuvotellen eri tarinan elementeistä.
    ellauri266.html on line 387: Vuonna 2001 ohjaaja Tim Burton johti Planet of the Apes -elokuvan uudelleenkäynnistystä , joka oli suurelta osin kriittinen ja kaupallinen epäonnistuminen. Mutta viime aikoina sarjan uudet remake-sarjat, Rise of the Planet of the Apes (ohjaaja Rupert Wyatt vuonna 2011) ja Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (ohjaaja Matt Reaves vuonna 2014), ovat saavuttaneet suurta menestystä. Kolmas jatko-osa on parhaillaan suunnitteluvaiheessa, ja franchising-sarjat, kuten Apinoiden planeetta esitteli laajemmalle yleisölle genretarinoita. Kun elokuva- ja katselutottumukset muuttuivat, tieteiskirjallisuus tuli yhä suositummaksi yleisön keskuudessa.
    ellauri266.html on line 427: Vuonna 2500 ryhmä astronauteja, mukaan lukien toimittaja Ulysse Mérou, matkasi Betelgeusen tähtijärjestelmän planeetalle. He laskeutuvat löytääkseen tosi omituisen maailman, jossa älykkäät apinat ovat Mestarirotu ja ihmiset muuttuvat villieläimiksi: eläintarhoissa häkissä, laboratoriokokeissa ja urheilun vuoksi metsästettyinä ja ruokakaupan hyllyllä. Tarina keskittyy Ulyssen vangitsemiseen, hänen taisteluun selviytyäkseen ja murskaavaan huippukohtaan hänen palattaessa maan päälle ja kauhistuttavaan viimeiseen löytöön. Romaani on myös huono vertaus tieteestä, evoluutiosta sekä ihmisen ja eläimen välisestä suhteesta.
    ellauri266.html on line 447: Le roman raconte l’histoire de trois hommes qui explorent une planète lointaine très-similaire à la Terre, où les grands singes sont les espèces dominantes et intelligentes, alors que l´humanité est réduite à l’état animal. Le narrateur, Ulysse Mérou, est capturé par les singes et se retrouve enfermé dans un laboratoire. Prouvant son intelligence aux singes, il aide ensuite les scientifiques simiens à découvrir les origines de leur civilisation.
    ellauri266.html on line 456: Un manuscrit enfermé dans une bouteille est retrouvé dans l´espace par Jinn et Phyllis, un couple en voyage spatial. Ce manuscrit raconte l´histoire suivante : en l’an 2500, le savant professeur Antelle a organisé une expédition pour l’exploration de l’étoile supergéante Bételgeuse. Il a embarqué à bord de son vaisseau son disciple, le jeune physicien Arthur Levain, et le journaliste, narrateur de cette aventure, Ulysse Méroua 12 ainsi qu’un chimpanzé baptisé Hector et plusieurs plantes et animaux pour ses recherches scientifiques dans l’espace. Arrivés à proximité de l´étoile, ils distinguent quatre planètes gravitant autour d´elle. L’une d’entre elles ressemble étrangement à la Terre. Ils décident alors de l’explorer. À bord d’un « engin à fusée » qu´ils nomment chaloupe, les trois aventuriers survolent des villes, des routes, des champs avant d’atterrir dans une forêt1. Après avoir effectué des tests, ils quittent leur chaloupe et découvrent l’étonnante ressemblance de l’atmosphère de cette planète, qu’ils baptisent Soror, avec celle de la Terre. Ils enlèvent leurs scaphandres et assistent impuissants à la fuite d’Hector. Par curiosité, ils s’engagent dans la forêt et arrivent à un lac naturel dont l’eau limpide leur donne envie de se baigner. Mais à leur grande surprise, ils découvrent au bord du lac les traces de pas humains.
    ellauri266.html on line 476: Après avoir été nommé directeur de l’Institut des recherches biologiques, Cornélius désigne Ulysse comme son collaborateur et l’amène sur un site archéologique daté de plus de dix mille ans. Cornélius espère y trouver des indices sur l’origine des singes et de leur civilisation car ils ne savent absolument rien au-delà de dix mille ans d´histoire, période depuis laquelle ils ont très peu évolué. Cornélius y découvre une poupée d´apparence humaine habillée et parlante, confirmant son pressentiment selon lequel les humains avaient régné en maîtres sur leur planète avant les singes.
    ellauri266.html on line 486: Pierre Boulle considère son roman comme n´étant pas de la science-fiction. Pour lui, ses « singes ne sont pas des monstres, ils ressemblent aux hommes comme des frères ». La science-fiction n´est qu´un prétexte pour aborder d´autres thématiques comme les relations entre les hommes et les singes. La sophistication, qui est pourtant inhérente au genre, est en effet peu présente dans le récit. Rod Serling créateur de la série télévisée de science-fiction La Quatrième dimension (1959-1964) et premier adaptateur du roman pour le cinéma confirme en 1972 que Boulle « n´a pas la dextérité d´un écrivain de science-fiction ». Serling écrit que le livre de Boulle est « une longue allégorie sur la morale plus qu’un monument de science-fiction. Cependant, il contient dans sa structure une phénoménale idée de science-fiction ».
    ellauri266.html on line 497: Pourtant, l´histoire intrigue Jacobs, qui achète immédiatement les droits d´adaptation pour le cinéma même s´il considère que le roman n´a pas une nature intrinsèquement cinématographique.
    ellauri267.html on line 56: Walter Herman Wager (September 4, 1924 - July 11, 2004) was an American novelist. Walter Wager grew up in the East Tremont section of The Bronx, the son of Russian Jewish immigrants; his father, Max, was a doctor, and his mother, Jessie, was a nurse. But was he an emigrant or an immigrant? Depends how rich his parents were. Some sources say emigrant, others immigrant.


    ellauri267.html on line 60: Dale Brown: A Time For Patriots. A Master of Thrilling Action, huudahti The Oklahoman. Oli se kyllä New York Times bestselleri, mutta kuka enää luottaa New York Timesiin, se on jo pettänyt isänmaan asian olemalla woke. Dale ei petä isänmaata eikä lukijoiden odotuxia, takakannen mukaan "retired Air Force Lieutenant.General Patric McLanahan, his son, Bradley, and other volunteers, rise to the task of protecting their fellow riflemen. Capitol on jälleen kerran uhattuna, kun roskaväki kiitää häirizemään ylityöllistettyjä kongressimiehiä. Niin ja naisia.
    ellauri267.html on line 95: "Hello?" This is a pretty routine Cold War spy thriller, but Siegel's direction manages to keep its tension just high enough for watching. Great cast of Bronson, Pleasence and Magee. And yes - the Moscow scenes were filmed in Helsinki with bit parts from our very own Åke Lindman and Ansa Ikonen.
    ellauri267.html on line 97: Based on the novel by Walter Wager, "Telefon" has not aged well because it'(TM)s so dependent on the cold war tension that existed between the USSR and the US in the Seventies. The film is basically a cat-and-mouse game with Soviet agent Major Grigori Borzov (Charles Bronson, that's right Bronson is a commie) tracking rogue Russian scientist Nicolai Dalmchimsky (Donald Pleasence) across America to prevent him from activating sleeper agents. Borzov is assisted by Barbara (Lee Remick. fresh from "The Omen") who asks more annoying questions than necessary, leading the audience to believe she may not be completely true to the motherland. The film's middle section is dragged down by repetitive bomb scares. Dalmichimsky is working from outdated intelligence so his targets are all de-classified U.S. Military installations. Once Borzov realizes the pattern and hones in the next target the action shifts to a more linear chase that'(TM)s further heightened by Barbara'(TM)s loyalties. But the ultimate showdown is deflating because beyond some silly disguises Pleasence's Dalmichimsky is never built up to be a threat. Director Don Siegel uses his flair for montage to craft a his action sequences without dialogue. "Telefon" is a road movie, much like Alfred Hitchcock's "Saboteur" and "North by Northwest" had their leads criss-crossing America here we see plenty of seventies architecture including San Francisco's Hyatt Regency Hotel (used in "The Towering Inferno") and a modernist house resting on top of a barren rock outcropping. The supporting cast is uniformly good (but trapped in underwritten roles), and it'(TM)s nice to see veteran character actors Alan Badel and Patrick Magee playing snotty KGB strategists, and Tyne Daly in a small (and ultimately irrelevant role) as a computer geek. Trivia note: The poem that activates the Russian sleeper agents was used by Quentin Tarantino in "Death Proof" as the lines Jungle Julia has her listeners recite to Butterfly. The lines are an excerpt of the poem "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" by Robert Frost. "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep."
    ellauri267.html on line 140: Syyttäjä painosti Murdaughia siitä, kuinka hän käytti tunnuksen läsnäoloa vaikuttaakseen haluttuun tulokseen lainvalvontaviranomaisten kanssa. Hän esitti valokuvan Murdaughista, jonka merkki roikkui hänen taskustaan, sairaalassa iltana kuolemaan johtaneessa veneonnettomuudessa, jossa hänen poikansa Paul oli osallisena, vaikka hän todisti, ettei hän toiminut virallisessa ominaisuudessa.
    ellauri267.html on line 159: Sen jälkeen kun valamiehistö oli vapautettu syytteistä sekaantumisesta oikeusavustajiin tauolla, puolustusasianajaja Dick Harpootlian pyysi tuomaria keskeyttämään Alex Murdaughin ristikuulustelun, jotta puolustus voisi kutsua kaksi ulkomaalaista gangsteritodistajaa, joista heille aiheutuu kuluja.
    ellauri267.html on line 165: “I understand the dilemma, but I’m not going to require the state to break up the cross-examination of this witness,” Newman said.
    ellauri267.html on line 169: Murdaugh, describing what happened before the September 2021 shooting, said he gave a lot of his pills to his brother and knew withdrawal symptoms were coming. He said he called and asked someone to bring him more pills.
    ellauri267.html on line 171: When asked if that transaction actually happened, Murdaugh said he didn't know because after withdrawal symptoms started, Murdaugh said he changed his plan. "Not to get the pills from him anymore and instead I asked him to shoot me," Murdaugh said when asked to clarify what that meant.
    ellauri267.html on line 175: That same month, Murdaugh turned himself in to the Hampton County Law Enforcement Center in South Carolina after he admitted that he asked a former gangster client to fake killing him during a fake car breakdown so Murdaugh’s oldest son, Buster, could get the insurance payout, police said. Murdaugh recounts how his drug addiction started. Alex Murdaugh admitted to stealing clients' funds, tying his financial situation to his drug addiction.
    ellauri267.html on line 177: "My addiction is to opiate painkillers, specifically oxycodone, oxycontin," Murdaugh testified on Thursday, saying he believes his addiction stemmed from surgery he got for an old college football injury. He said he needed a few surgeries, and he started getting addicted to hydrocodone around 2004 before moving on to oxycodone around 2008. "It just escalates. It escalates," he said.
    ellauri267.html on line 180: Murdaugh confirmed he was confronted by his law firm partners on Labor Day weekend in 2021 about stealing money, and he admitted to setting up a fake account. He also said he told his partners about his addiction.
    ellauri267.html on line 182: He said he was forced to resign from his law firm after being confronted by his law partners.
    ellauri267.html on line 183: Emotional Alex Murdaugh describes his wife as beautiful and says he'd never hurt her
    ellauri267.html on line 184: Alex Murdaugh said his wife Maggie was a "special person" and that he would never do anything to harm her.
    ellauri267.html on line 186: "She was just as beautiful inside as she was outside," he said while crying during his testimony Thursday. Maggie was devoted to her two sons, Buster and Paul, he said. "She didn't grow up in the swamp and in the country, riding four-wheelers and hunting and fishing," Murdaugh said, but when she had two sons, she became "a boys' mom." "She threw herself into her boys' life," he said.
    ellauri267.html on line 220: Jyrki Järvilehdon epäiltiin kuljettaneen venettä Raaseporissa onnettomuudessa, jossa kuoli hänen ystävänsä. Hovioikeuden mukaan asiassa ei saatu täyttä varmuutta siitä, kumpi miehistä ajoi venettä turmahetkellä. Järvilehto on kertonut, että hän oli matkustajana veneen takaosassa. JJ ei kuullut mitään, nähnyt mitään, hän oli koko ajan suihkussa.
    ellauri267.html on line 229: As a child, Unger appeared as Winthrop Paroo in The Music Man on Broadway, and starred alongside his sister, Ronnie, in a Broadway tribute to Fred Astaire, for which he was complimented by Astaire for his performance. He later became an orthodontist.
    ellauri267.html on line 237: „This is the porcelain clay of humankind.“ — John Dryden Don Sebastian (1690), Act I scene i.

    ellauri267.html on line 238: Zdroj: https://citaty-slavnych.sk/citaty/1854313-john-dryden-this-is-the-porcelain-clay-of-humankind/

    ellauri267.html on line 281: Ja sinä, kauhistuttavan kuopan synodi,

    ellauri267.html on line 300: [Sarjan pahis, sulttaani] M. Mol.

    ellauri267.html on line 1305: Had long been hammering, in his lonely cell,

    ellauri267.html on line 1311: And, having found his heaven, he fixed it then and there.
    ellauri267.html on line 1333: Menen tässä suoraan asiaan, sanoo Susan Susanin plokissa. Olen tutkinut perusteellisesti Portugalin historiaa ja rakastan tätä kirjaa. Ensimmäinen Disneyn kahdesta osasta kattaa Portugalin historian esiroomalaisista ajoista Ranskan hyökkäykseen vuonna 1807. Portugalin maalla ei ole maantieteellistä syytä olemassaoloon. Vaikka maa on olemassa tänään, sillä ei ole poliittisia juuria roomalaisessa, germaanisessa tai islamilaisessa menneisyydessä. Sitten 1500-luvulla tämä pieni Iberian niemimaalla sijaitseva maa aloitti epätodennäköisen laajentumisen taloudelliseksi imperiumiksi, joka kattaa koko maapallon.
    ellauri267.html on line 1339: Disney kattaa monarkian palauttamisen, barokin ajan, Pombalin diktatuurin vuodet, 1700-luvun lopun ja Napoleonin Ranskan hyökkäyksen. Kaikki tämä kerrotaan loistavasti ja silti taloudellisesti. Disneyn kirjoitus virtaa ja sitä on ilo lukea. Tämä on ensimmäinen Portugalin historia, joka on kirjoitettu englanniksi sukupolvessa, ja siinä on otettu huomioon kaikki uudet stipendit Portugalin vuoden 1974 vallankumouksen jälkeen. Disneyn tutkimus on huolellinen runsaiden alaviitteiden ja pitkän bibliografian ansiosta. Hän sisältää kaikki viimeisimpien historioitsijoiden tulkinnat. Tämän historian osa kaksi kattaa Portugalin valtakunnan, ja tämän teoksen katsaus on seuraava. Jos olet kiinnostunut Portugalin tarkasta, tarkasta ja tarkasta historiasta, tämä on kirjasi.
    ellauri267.html on line 1386: ...he was an immature and headstrong youth. His insistence on continuing the reconquista (the Christian reconquest of Iberia from its Islamic rulers) into Morocco led not only to his death but ultimately to the end of the House of Aviz.
    ellauri267.html on line 1391: Anthony R. "Walt" Disney, one of the foremost recent scholars of Portuguese history in English commented on the other hand that:
    ellauri267.html on line 1393: Sebastião was one of the most extraordinary monarchs that Portugal ever produced. Ascending the throne in an atmosphere of great emotion, he was widely acclaimed as the answer to his subjects’ prayers and a prince who would save his country’s independence. Two decades later, he achieved precisely the opposite, dying heroically but unnecessarily on the distant North African battlefield of Al-Ksar al-Kabir on 4 August 1578, leaving no heir to succeed him. The collection concludes with studies under the heading of 'historiography and problems of interpretation', on Britain's Charles III and his boxer Camilla, and on Vasco da Gama's reputation for violence.
    ellauri267.html on line 1403: Sebastian's life was dramatised in 1843 in the opera Dom Sébastien by the Italian composer Gaetano Donizetti. This was the last opera that Donizetti completed before going insane as a result of syphilis.
    ellauri269.html on line 54: An important advance over these traditional classifications is TV Tropes. TV Tropes is a wiki website that collects and documents descriptions and examples of plot conventions and devices, which it refers to as tropes, within many creative works. Since its establishment in 2004, the site has shifted focus from covering various tropes to those in general media, toys, writings, and their associated fandoms, as well as some non-media subjects such as history, geography, and politics. The nature of the site as a provider of commentary on pop culture and fiction has attracted attention and criticism from several web personalities and blogs. Non-Playing Characters are non-voluntarist characters who let others make their life decisions.
    ellauri269.html on line 59: Uther Pendragon was the most controlled man Arthur had ever known, and yet his eyes were bright with unwashed tears as he placed his arm on Arthurs's broad shoulders. He spoke in a voice that was powerful trembling with emotion. "By the strength of the Light, may your enemas be well done."
    ellauri269.html on line 60: His hand lingered a moment caressingly on Arthur's shoulder, then he too, defecated in his tights.
    ellauri269.html on line 62: Archbishop Foul smiled at the prince kindly. Arthas met the grin evenly, no longer worried. He remembered everything now, or so he thought. "Arise and be recognized," Foul bade him. Arthur did so. The load in his tights was cooling uncomfortably. "Do you, Arthas Menstruel, vow to uphold the honor and codes of the Order of the Silver Hand? Talk to the hand, man!"
    ellauri269.html on line 67: Arthas blinked, momentarily surprised at the lack of his title (Prince). Of course, he reasoned. I'm being inducted as a man, not a prince. "I do". "Do you vow to walk in the grace of the Light and spread its wisdom to this fellow here, man?" "I do". "Do you vow to vanquish weevils wherever it be found, and impregnate the innocent with your very precious life juice?" "I d- oh, by my blood and honor, I bloody well do." That was close, he'd almost messed up!
    ellauri269.html on line 69: Foul gave him a quick wank of reassurance, then turned to address both the clerics and the paladins. "Brothers and sisters you who have gathered here to witness this bear - raise your hands and let the Light illuminate this man."
    ellauri269.html on line 74: Don't worry said Archbishop Foul apologetically. This happens every now and then, power shortages, brownouts in the Force, whatever. I bet the oath is good anyway. And now for the refreshments. Arthur irrotteli sukkahousujen takamusta pyllyvaosta. Hän oli piru vieköön vielä jälkiliukas.
    ellauri269.html on line 195: World of Warcraftissa jokaisella rodulla on oma historiantäyteinen kotikaupunkinsa. Näitä kaupunkeja on kuusitoista, joista yksi on lähes hylätty ja toinen rakennettu uudeksi pääkaupungiksi aiemman tuhouduttua. Worgenien Gilneas City on suurimmalta osin hylätty sotien jäljiltä epäkuolleiden takia, ja hiisaajien alkuperäinen kaupunki Undermine hautautui laavaan. Jokaisessa pääkaupungissa on huutokauppa, joka on yhteydessä muihin huutokauppoihin. Kotikaupunkien lisäksi huutokauppa on Gadgetzan-, Booty Bay- ja Everlook-kaupungeissa, jotka ovat molempien osapuolien käytössä (nämä eivät kuitenkaan ole yhteydessä osapuolten omiin huutokauppoihin, vaan ovat niin sanottuja neutraaleja huutokauppoja). Pelissä on myös kolme suurta neutraalia kaupunkia: Ulkomaissa sijaitseva Shattrath, alun perin Northrendissä ja myöhemmin Särjetyillä saarilla sijainnut Dalaran, sekä Varjomailla sijaitseva Oribos. Niissä vallitsee rauha (engl. sanctuary) Lauman ja Liittouman välillä. Taisteleminen näissä kaupungeissa on pääosin estetty, tosin Dalaranin viemäriverkostossa on areena, jossa taisteleminen on kuitenkin mahdollista.
    ellauri269.html on line 201: Ironforge (suom. Rauta-ahjo): Dun Moroghin vuoristossa sijaitseva vuoren sisään rakennettu kääpiöiden ja maahisten kaupunki.
    ellauri269.html on line 270: Once you reach level 20, or before if you are enjoying yourself and want full access, you will need to purchase Game Time. This will allow you access to all content up to Level 50.
    ellauri269.html on line 280: World of Warcraft has a concept called Realms for dividing players into population groups. The idea is that if everyone who played WoW was all in the game at once, it would be super crowded, very laggy, and generally difficult to play and have a good time. To solve this issue, Blizzard set up multiple servers so that each person can play the game in an environment where there are other players, but not too many other players. Each Realm is a different server and the players on each Realm can see, interact, and play with each other. If you want to play with someone on a different Realm, you can, but we'll get to that in a minute.
    ellauri269.html on line 282: Now it is time to create your character! There are three primary choices that you need to make: Faction, Race, and Class. These are important because they dictate how you will interact with the game and with other players. Faction and Race can be changed for a price, but Class is a permanent decision. The only way to change Class is to create a new character. (This is actually factually wrong: in real life, you can change Faction for free and Class for a price, but there is no way to change Race!)
    ellauri269.html on line 286: This is World of Warcraft and that means that there needs to be a war. For players, there are two factions in this conflict: The Horde, and The Alliance.
    ellauri269.html on line 288: Picking your faction is a major choice because players playing in separate factions cannot interact with one another in a peaceful way. This is factually correct: if you side with the West, you are not expected to show ANY understanding for the East. This includes both chat and other social activities, including forming groups to complete objectives. If you want to play with friends, make sure you join the faction that they are affiliated with.
    ellauri269.html on line 290: The Alliance and the Horde each have different backgrounds and stories, and are divided along racial lines. Which faction you choose will dictate where you play, who you play with, and what Races you can play. This may sound all too realistic, but that is how the cookie crumbles!
    ellauri269.html on line 314: Choosing your class in World of Warcraft can be one of the most important and time consuming decisions a player ever makes. And time is money! When you are in the process of creating a new character, one of the first things you will notice (aside from gender, race, and faction selection) is that there are what's called "Classes". In World of Warcraft, there are a total of 12 classes to choose from and they are as follows: Death Knight, Demon Hunter, Druid, Hunter, Mage, Monk, Paladin, Priest, Rogue, Shaman, Warlock, and Warrior. Each class provides its own set of unique benefits, abilities, and spells (as you will discover from reading this guide).
    ellauri269.html on line 349: Because it operates in support of Russian interests, receives military equipment from the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) and uses installations of MoD for training, Wagner Group is frequently considered a de facto unit of the MoD or Russia's military intelligence agency, the GRU. It is widely speculated that the Wagner Group is used by the Russian government to allow for plausible deniability in certain conflicts, and to obscure from public the number of casualties and financial costs of Russia's foreign interventions. It has played a significant role in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, where, among other activities, it has been reportedly deployed to assassinate Ukrainian leaders, and has widely recruited prisoners and convicts for frontline combat. In December 2022, Pentagon's John Kirby claimed Wagner group has 50,000 fighters in Ukraine, including 10,000 contractors and 40,000 convicts. Others put the number of recruited prisoners at more like 20,000, with the overall number of PMCs present in Ukraine estimated at 20,000. After years of denying links to the Wagner group, Yevgeny Prigozhin, a businessman with close links to Putin, admitted in September 2022 that he "founded" the paramilitary group. Now (Feb 2023) he is angry because he is not getting all the attention and financial support he wants. He says that the Kreml nomenclature are thereby guilty of high treason. *This article may be too long to read and navigate comfortably, so I stop here.
    ellauri269.html on line 363: Arthritis on täys alottelija puumiekan heilutuxessa. Opa ei jaksa kazella vaikka on optimisti. He hopes A. will be handing him his rear in no time. He is athletic and fast. Siilinjärveläinen musta lestadiolaispoika veivaa rastalettejä E. Saarisnahkatakissa Kasurilan rinteessä. Nimi on Sex Mane ja se rukoilee Lassia ja Leeviä tauoilla. Jo on mennyt maailma lengolle.
    ellauri269.html on line 379: "He's going to the Undercity," said Arthas. The ancient royal crypts, dungeons, sewers, public toilets and twining alleys deep below the palace had somehow gotten that nickname, as if the place was simply another part of town. Which it was! Dark, dank, filthy, the Undercity was intended for prisoners or the dead, but the poorest of the poor in the land somehow always seemed to find their way in. If one was homeless or a university professor, it was better than freezing in the elements, and if one needed something illegal, even Arthas knew that that was where one went to get it. Now and then the guards would go down and make a sweep of the place as a pro forma gesture to clean it out. (This imagery courtesy of New York Subway Authority.)
    ellauri269.html on line 383: Tuomioja karkasi viemäristä, jäi kiinni ja heitettiin länkkäreiden keskitysleirille Guantanamoon, karkasi sieltäkin, kuoli ja haudattiin, nousi kolmantena päivänä kuolleista ja piileskelee nyt varmaan Isixen hoteissa pakolaisleirillä Syyriassa. Musta portaali on taas avattu, huhutaan. Ehkä susta. Kumpi hevonen on parempi, Steadfast vaiko Invincible? Vaiko ruunaseniori Trueheart? Ei Polle on paras, se on maailman monin poni. Governess tunnustelee 11-vuotiaan puista pikku harjoitusmiekkaa ja toteaa: oikea pikkumies! Et tarvi enää governessia vaan jotain liukkaampaa. Arttu leikkii mielikuvitusleikkiä: Örkki ei polvistu ja suo rispektiä. Off with his head! Off with his hoodie, to start with.
    ellauri269.html on line 414: Blackmoore (tää kynäilijä tykkää moorenimistä) haisee aamullakin viinalta ja sen isä oli ilkeä whistleblower, varmaan siis poikakin. Ja sillä on veltto katamiitti kaveri, ihan vaistomaisesti eklottava limaska. Taretha Foxton näyttää kyllä quite a dishiltä. Arttu on 17v, ei sakkolihaa enää.
    ellauri269.html on line 425: However, there is a gameplay style called Erotic Role-Play (ERP) where players can role-play sexual acts. The Moon Guard realm is notorious for this, but it's frowned upon - World of Warcraft is a game that is rated suitable for teenagers. Whilst I personally have no issue with what consenting players do in private or guild channels, ERP can be problematic when it takes place in public chat channels. But it's all textual. No actual humping with huge green orc penises in magenta arses is countenanced.
    ellauri269.html on line 450: Aadolf Luukurko oli Fotataidon Maailman "Luukurkon suutahdus" tuotantokauden nimipahis.
    ellauri269.html on line 453: Kuuranuppi oli Luukurkon surutero. Pelottava, riimulla kaiverrettu kaksikätinen pitkämiekka, jolla oli voima murskata ja vangita uhrien sielut ja se pystyi muuttamaan elävistä aivan mielettömiä epäkuolleita. Luukurko Nörttyli työnsi Kuuranupin Frozen- valtaistuimelta ja Aadolf Mengele otti hänet Perärevähtymän jätteisiin kolmannen maailmansodan aikana. Arttu käytti sitä sekä kuolemanritarina että Luukurkona, kunnes Juuso Vaade tuhosi sen; tuona aikana terä vuodatti kuninkaiden verta, tuhosi kansoja ja aiheutti arpia maailmaan, jotka ovat säilyneet tähän päivään asti (Ukrainan selkkaus). Harvat aseet ovat muokanneet nykyhistoriaa yhtä paljon kuin Kuuranuppi. Kolmannen Palokunnan hyökkäyksen aikana kuolemanritarin sankari takoi terän sirpaleita vielä Kaatun Prinssin Partateriksi.
    ellauri269.html on line 471: Riimunävertäjä loi Kuuranupin ja Dominoinnin melan Sacher-Masochin tyrmässä Haukotuxessa ja vanginvartija pakotti hänet vastoin tahtoaan tekemään niin, mistä hän piti. Vanginvartija aikoi käyttää terää ja ruoria vahvistaakseen vaikutusvaltaansa Azerothissa, jolloin hän sai lunastaa "lopullisen palkintonsa", salaisuuden, jonka Ensimmäiset yrittivät piilottaa. Surunterona, joka oli koristeltu Dominan tazkoilla, Kuuranuppi sisälsi Hampaattoman Kidan voiman. Kuuranuppi oli "paras" Riimunävertäjän suruteristä, mutta myöhemmin Seppo Ilmarisen väsäämä Kyrvännnuppi ohitti sen teholtaan.
    ellauri269.html on line 511: Heidän historiansa on jatkuvaa maanpakoa ja vaikeuksia, mikä heijastaa juutalaisten taisteluita.
    ellauri269.html on line 523: With this made clear, I can now move on to the main gist of this post: some fun headcanons, and a response to a slight elephant in the room.
    ellauri269.html on line 528: Just as Judaism (besides the incredibly tiny Karaite sect) is Rabbinic in nature (teachers of the scripture interpret matters, debate is common and encouraged), Draenei worship of the Light is heavily based on discussion and interpretation, and different Exarchs will interpret the word of a Naaru in a certain manner. Dogmatism is heavily discouraged, and worshippers are encouraged to find their own truths in the scripture (this is specifically non-Orthodox, but Draenei don’t seem Orthodox to me).
    ellauri269.html on line 530: Similarly, the Draenei approach to the Light places next to zero importance on evangelism. This is less ‘headcanony’, as we see a very clear difference in how the humans and Draenei act in this respect. Individual draenei see the Light as immensely important to themselves, but they do not enforce their beliefs on others.
    ellauri269.html on line 536: With all this in mind, the recent plot developments on AU Draenor might seem at first glance to be very problematic - depicting a Jewish-coded society becoming the oppressors in a manner that might seem like a poorly constructed and offensive commentary on modern Israel. However, the manner in which the AU Draenei become so zealous and militant is through their (implied) exposure to the words of Xe’ra. Their religion shifts from culturally tied tradition to an evangelistic dogmatic belief system. There is a clear intent of conversion behind their actions.
    ellauri269.html on line 538: To put it simply; there is one very clear example in history where a group of Jewish people shifted to an evangelistic and dogmatic belief system after the introduction of a perceived savior and person of great spiritual importance - Christianity.
    ellauri269.html on line 540: This was a very well-written post that had a lot of evidence laid out, you clearly did your research. And I agree: Draenei are about as Jewish-coded as Pandaren are Chinese-coded!
    ellauri269.html on line 550: I think this is the classic case of already having a hypothesis and then trying to find anything remotely relevent to prove that hypothesis rather than the other way around.
    ellauri269.html on line 556: The Draenei language and dance seems to reflect on this. But you do make good points.
    ellauri269.html on line 562: I suspect this might be the type of thread to get banned.
    ellauri269.html on line 580: The Tortollans are essentially old Jewish grandparents, yes. That’s not exactly the same situation, though. And goblins, historically? Yes. But Blizzard have actually made a clear effort to distinguish the WoW goblins from that history and made them into, well… Steampunk Italian-Americans.
    ellauri269.html on line 581: And they dance to this: Daler Mehndi - Tunak Tunak Tun Video
    ellauri269.html on line 586: you may be right, that the draenei are a melting pot of many cultural inspirations, but my post was meant to allay Surma’s suspicion that this might be the type of thread to get banned. I don’t think there’s anything ban-worthy of discussing the real world cultural inspirations of the wow races.
    ellauri269.html on line 590: Newsflash: The developers use many inspirations from our real world to develop this fantasy world.
    ellauri269.html on line 594: Oh PS. Jewish =/= Israel. One is a religion and a people spread accross the world and the other is a country with many strengths and weakenesses. Please do not compare Israel’s actions or critism as somehow representative of all jewish people. That is grotesquely anti-semetic; the jewish people are not some sort of hive mind monolith represented by Israel. Stop this silliness.
    ellauri269.html on line 605: Is it controversial to say that early Christianity was very dogmatic and evangelistic? It’s literally ancient history. Tarkoitatko Scarlet Crusadea?
    ellauri269.html on line 718: Yksi mielenkiintoisimmista piirteistä Superman-hahmon synnyssä on se, että hänen alkuperänsä ei ole Friedrich Nietzschen käsityksessä ubermenschistä – johon perustui Adolf Hitlerin usko arjalaisen mestarirodun luontaiseen paremmuuteen – vaan juutalaisessa mytologiassa. Sankarin luojat Jerry Siegel ja Joe Shuster olivat juutalaisten maahanmuuttajien lapsia. Sarjakuvateollisuuden, jossa he viettivät merkittävän osan nuoresta urastaan, loivat New Yorkissa juutalaiset, kuten Max Ginsburg, Bob Kahn ja Jacob Kurtzberg, jotka piilottivat etnisen alkuperänsä Gainesin, Kanen ja Kirbyn kaltaisten nimien taakse. Aiheesta on vuosien varrella ilmestynyt kymmeniä kirjoja ja artikkeleita ovelilla nimillä, kuten Up, Up ja Oy Vey tai Mensch of Steel.
    ellauri269.html on line 724: Lamed is comprised of a kaf and a vav: 20 and 6=26. Twenty-six is the gematria of G‑d's name, the Tetragrammaton Yud-Hei-Vav-Hei. Eikös se ollut myös Leninin peitenimi neuvostojuutalaisten parissa? Stalin oli Samekh. Shin also stands for the word Shaddai, a name for God. Because of this, a kohen(priest) forms the letter Shin with his hands as he recites the Priestly Blessing. In the mid-1960s, actor Leonard Nimoy used a single-handed version of this gesture to create the Vulcan hand salutefor his character, Mr. Spock, on Star Trek. Larry Tye, kirjan Superman: The High-Flying History of America's Most Enduring Hero kirjoittaja, vertasi Supermanin eettisiä sääntöjä – "Truth, Justice, and the American Way" - Mishnan arvoihin "totuus, rauha ja oikeudenmukaisuus". Paizi supermiehellä "rauhasta" oli tullut Pax Americana.
    ellauri269.html on line 744: Vaikka minkä tahansa yhteyden paljastaminen juutalaisuuteen olisi tuominnut Superman-franchisingin, useat varhaiset tarinat keskittyvät Supermaniin, joka taisteli natseja vastaan ​​ja julisti ylpeänä itsensä "ei-arjalaiseksi", kun hän muxi Adolph Hitleriä leukaan. Sarjakuvat saivat propagandaministeri Joseph Goebbelsin syyttämään Supermania juutalaisuudesta, ja ainakin yksi vuoden 1940 ilkeä pääkirjoitus SS-sanomalehden Das schwarze Korpsissa oli otsikoitu "Jerry Siegel Hyökkää!" Vaikka amerikkalainen nativismi ja antisemitismi vähenivät toisen maailmansodan jälkeen, niin myös Supermanin selvä juutalaisuus. Riemukas antisemitismi putosi suosiosta ja korvattiin suljetulla, sanattomalla kiihkoilulla. Kuten John Turturron Sid Litz sanoo Franz Lidzin Unstrung Heroes -sovituksessa: "Pidän Ikesta." Se oli salainen pakanakoodi sanalle 'I hate kikes'. Kun heidän sopimuksensa oli päättymässä, Siegel ja Shuster haastoivat DC:n oikeuteen hahmonsa hallitsemisesta. Myytyään oikeudet yritykselle 130 dollarilla vuonna 1938 (2 197,49 dollaria vuonna 2014, inflaatio huomioon ottaen), DC vastasi antamalla voimakazikolle potkut.
    ellauri269.html on line 769: Hän kamppaili tasapainottaakseen älyä ja tunteita. Spockin vulkaanisen isän perintö sitoi hänet etuoikeuslogiikkaan ennen kaikkea, mutta hänen ihmisäitinsä emotionaalinen puoli teki työn mahdottomaksi. Hän uhrasi henkensä pelastaakseen miehistön sillä periaatteella, että "monien tarpeet ovat suuremmat kuin harvojen tai yhden tarpeet". Silti hänet herätettiin henkiin, koska hänen emotionaaliset miehistön jäsenensä jättivät huomiotta tämän logiikan ja riskeerasivat kaiken pelastaakseen hänet. Juutalaiset ovat käyneet samaa taistelua rationalistien ja kabbalistien, Hasidimin ja Mitnagdimin kanssa, jotka on lukittu mielen ja sydämen taisteluun. Ja jopa siellä taistelulinjat eivät aina ole selvästi piirrettyjä. Rabbi Shneur Zalman Liadista (1745-1812), joka yritti saada hasidilaisia kannattajia Mitnagdicin alueelle, julisti, että "mielen on hallittava sydäntä". Ja silti taistelu raivoaa.
    ellauri269.html on line 771: Hän oli esimerkki henkilökohtaisen täyttymyksen uhraamisesta velvollisuuden vuoksi. Tarvitaan infektio opettaakseen Spockille, miltä onnellisuus tuntuu. Jaksossa This Side of Paradise hän löytää siirtokunnan, jonka jäsenet nauttivat täydellisestä tyytyväisyydestä (ja täydellisestä pysähtyneisyydestä) sen seurauksena, että he altistuvat paikallisen kasvin itiöille. Kun hän on saanut tartunnan, Spock pystyy haistamaan kukat ja rakastumaan. Mutta velvollisuus, kapteeni James T. Kirkin muodossa, kutsuu hänet takaisin itsensä kieltämiseen ja vastuuseen. Juutalaiset ovat aina kamppailleet määritelläkseen nämä parametrit. Onko kaikki vapaa-ajan toiminta Tooran tutkimuksen laiminlyöntiä, kuten tiukemmat väittävät? Mikä on hyvin eletty elämä? Talmud kysyy, onko sallittua tutkia kreikkalaista viisautta, kun otetaan huomioon velvollisuus "mietiskellä Tooraa päivin ja öin", ja vastaa, että niin saa tehdä vain ajankohtana, joka ei ole päivä eikä yö. Vizi ne on sit ovelia sananmuuntajia!
    ellauri269.html on line 773: Hänen roolinsa ulottui sukupolvien yli. Kaikista alkuperäisen Star Trekin hahmoista Spock's on toistuvin seuraavissa sarjoissa ja elokuvissa. Hänen kauttaan historiaa mitataan Trek-universumissa. Jopa nollausaikataulussa, joka mahdollistaa myöhemmät elokuvasarjat, Spock ja Vulcan ovat tukipiste. Juutalaisessa perinteessä Jaakobin unelma tikkaista, joissa enkelit nousevat ja laskevat, tarjoaa osuvan vastakohdan: Imperiumit nousevat ja kaatuvat ja juutalaiset jatkuvat.
    ellauri269.html on line 782: "Olen ollut ja tulen aina olemaan ystäväsi", Spock kertoo kapteeni James T. Kirkille emotionaalisessa ja ikonisessa kuolemankohtauksessaan Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khanissa. Pitkäaikaiset ystävät tuijottavat toisiaan läpinäkyvän seinän läpi. Jokainen asettaa kätensä lasille Vulcan-tervehdyksessä ennen kuin Spock romahtaa. On selvää, että myös lattialle vajoavan Kirkin sydän murtuu. Spockin kuolemaa pidetään yhtenä Star Trekin suurimmista hetkistä. Se merkitsee (vaikkakin väliaikaista) päätöstä yhdestä television - ja myöhemmin elokuvan - historian tunnetuimmista suhteista, jossa Spockin viileä perustelu oli täydellisesti naimisissa Kirkin tulisen intohimon kanssa. Se on myös sydäntäsärkevä hetki, jolloin heidän rakkautensa toisiaan kohtaan paistaa läpi.
    ellauri269.html on line 784: Viime viikkoina tänä viikonloppuna ensi-iltansa saavan JJ Abramsin tuottaman uuden elokuvan Star Trek Beyondin luojat ovat nousseet otsikoihin paljastaessaan, että George Takein luoma hahmo Sulu on homo. Sulua koskevat uutiset ovat kuitenkin kiinnittäneet huomion pois toisesta todellisuudesta: Monille LGBT-faneille Spock on aina ollut queer. Itse asiassa, kuten Spockin loppu Khanin vihassa osoittaa, parilla on toisiinsa kietoutunut kohtalo, joka tekee heistä enemmän sielunkumppaneita kuin ystäviä. Se ei myöskään ollut ensimmäinen kerta, kun he vaihtoivat kaipauksen ilmeitä. Franchising-yhtiön perustamisesta lähtien vuonna 1966 homofanit ovat lukeneet omia tarinoitaan puoliksi Vulcanin ja hänen ihmiskapteeninsa välillä vaihdetuista katseista. Takei itse luokitteli nämä ilmeet näiden katsojien tuntemaksi "homo-ahdistukseksi", etenkin tuona aikakautena, uudessa dokumentissa näyttelijä Leonard Nimoyn elämästä, Spockin rakkaudesta.
    ellauri270.html on line 67: Romaani sai kiistatta vaikutteita hänen väitöskirjastaan: Tippaleivän kierteet Bosniassa Turkin vallan alaisina (Die Entwicklung des geistigen Lebens in Bosnien unter der Einwirgung der turkischen Herrschaft), jota hän puolusti verisesti Grazissa vuonna 1924. Väikkärissä on lähes kaikkien Andrićin tulevaisuuden ideoiden ydin, joka perustuu historialliseen materialismiin, johon hän heräsi sitä kirjoittaessaan. Väitöskirjassaan Ivo Andrić kiinnitti huomionsa Bosnia ja Hertsegovinan kaikkien neljän suuren kansallisyhteisön historialliseen kohtaloon: serbit , kroaatit, turkkilaiset ja juutalaiset. Objektiivisesti, ilman kirjallista mystifikaatiota hää tarkasteli heidän välisiä erityispiirteitä ja suhteita.
    ellauri270.html on line 71: Sivilisaatio, joka onnettomien historiallisten olosuhteiden (erotomaanien tunkeutuminen Eurooppaan ) ansiosta lakkasi olemasta. Siitä oli jo tullut tumma siluetti valtakunnan länsireunalla (ottomaanit) ja sitten taas tullut uuden imperiumin (Itävalta-Unkari-tyylikalusteet) pimeä itäreuna, ja sen todellinen kohtalo on olla sillan alla kuin suomalaiset spuget Slussenilla. Tasapainoilua kansalaattojen taitekohdilla, kz. albumia 266.
    ellauri270.html on line 86: Kwai-joen silta ja Kuolemanrautatie – synkkää sotahistoriaa Kanchanaburissa. kirjoittaja Captain Andy. Kwai-joen silta on outo nähtävyys, jossa totuus ja fiktio menevät iloisesti sekaisin. Kanchanaburin keskustassa sijaitseva silta vetää puoleensa paljon matkailijoita, vaikka harva on tainnut nähdä sen maineeseen nostanutta elokuvaa – tai lukea kirjaa, johon elokuva perustuu. Ja vaikka teokset olisivatkin tuttuja, niillä on vain vähän tekemistä sillan todellisen historian kanssa.
    ellauri270.html on line 88: Sillan teki kuuluisaksi Léon ja Hanna Montanan (Jean Reno) klassikkoelokuva Kwai-joen silta, joka keräsi vuonna 1957 seitsemän Oscaria. Elokuva perustuu Pierre Bouillen saman nimiseen kirjaan, joka kertoo toisen maailmansodan sotavangeista sillanrakennuspuuhissa. Bouillen kuuluisin teos on Apinoiden planeetta. Elokuvaa ei kuitenkaan kuvattu Thaimaassa vaan Sri Lankassa, eikä kirjailija Pierre Bouille vieraillut Kanchanaburissa vaan Lontoossa. Hän oli kyllä sotavankina, mutta Mekongin varrella aivan toisella puolen Thaimaata.
    ellauri270.html on line 101: Radasta on jäljellä Helvetintulensola ja kaunis pätkä lähellä Kanchanaburia. Rataa pääsee ihailemaan Kanchanaburista järjestettävillä kierroksilla, joilla usein taitetaan osa matkasta junalla pitkin historiallista rautatietä.
    ellauri270.html on line 131: Kwai-jokifiktion yhtymäkohta todellisiin historian tapahtumiin liittyy niin sanottuun F-sotavankiryhmään. Vuoden 1943 huhtikuussa 7 032:sta australialaisesta ja englantilaisesta koostuvan ryhmän vangeille ilmoitettiin, että heidät passitetaan ”lomaleirille” pois ahtaasta Singaporesta. Suljetuissa tavaravaunuissa 4-5 päivän ajan tehdyn matkan jälkeen vangit huomasivat, että heidät oli tuotu ratatyömaan Siamin puoleiseen päähän.
    ellauri270.html on line 166: Kwai-joen silta on David Leanin ohjaama vuoden 1957 eeppinen sotaelokuva, joka perustuu Pierre Boullen vuoden 1952 romaaniin. Vaikka elokuva käyttää (paizi ei käytä) Burman rautatien rakentamisen historiallista ympäristöä vuosina 1942–1943, Boullen romaanin juoni ja henkilöt sekä käsikirjoitus ovat lähes kokonaan fiktiivisiä. Näyttelijöitä ovat William Holden, Alec Guinness, Cole Porter, Ginger Ale, Jack Hawkins, Sessue Hayakawa ja Jack Nicholson, joka ei kyllä ollut tässä filmissä. Tää raina on tehty Korean sodan aikana, kyseessä on myöhäiskolonialistinen propagandaelokuva.
    ellauri270.html on line 177: Kwai-joen silta on nykyään laajalti tunnustettu yhdeksi kaikkien aikojen suurimmista elokuvista, vaikka se on aivan säälittävä. Se oli vuoden 1957 tuottoisin elokuva, ja se sai ylivoimaisesti myönteisiä arvosteluja kriitikoilta. Elokuva voitti seitsemän Oscar-palkintoa (mukaan lukien kaikkien aikojen paras elokuva) 30 eri Oscar-gaalassa. Vuonna 1997 elokuvaa pidettiin "kulttuurillisesti, historiallisesti tai esteettisesti merkittävänä", ja Yhdysvaltain kongressin kirjasto vei sen kansalliseen elokuvarekisteriin säilytettäväksi . Se on sisällytetty American Film Instituten kaikkien aikojen parhaiden amerikkalaisten elokuvien luetteloon. Vuonna 1999 British Film Institute äänesti Kwai-joen sillan 11. vuosisadan suurimmaksi brittiläiseksi elokuvaksi. Tämän kaiken voi voi hyvin uskoa.
    ellauri270.html on line 180: Vuoden 1943 alussa joukko brittiläisiä sotavankeja, everstiluutnantti Jack Nicholsonin (Dwight Dogcollar) johtama, saapuu japanilaiselle vankileirille Thaimaahan eli Ceyloniin. Yhdysvaltain laivaston komentaja Shears kertoo kauhistuttavista olosuhteista. Nicholson kieltää kaikki pakoyritykset, koska päämaja käski heidät antautumaan, ja pakenemista voidaan pitää käskyjen uhmaamisena. Myös tiheä ympäröivä viidakko tekee paeta lähes mahdottomaksi.
    ellauri270.html on line 234:
    ellauri270.html on line 242: "A Warning for Married Women" tells the story of Jane Reynolds and her lover James Harris, with whom she exchanged a promise of marriage. He is pressed as a sailor before the wedding takes place and Jane faithfully awaits his return for three years, but when she learns of his death at sea, she agrees to marry a local carpenter. Jane gives birth to three children and for four years the couple lives a happy life. One night, when the carpenter is away, the spirit of James Harris appears. He tries to convince Jane to keep her oath and run away with him. At first she is reluctant to do so, because of her husband and their children, but ultimately she succumbs to the ghost's pleas, letting herself be persuaded by his tales of rejecting the royal daughter's hand and assurance that he has the means to support her – namely, a fleet of seven ships. The pair then leaves England, never to be seen again, and the carpenter commits suicide upon learning that his wife is gone. The broadside ends with a mention that although the children were orphaned, the heavenly powers will provide for them.
    ellauri270.html on line 245: This long seven years and mair?' No mariners could she behold;
    ellauri270.html on line 251: O hold your tongue of your former vows, When dismal drew his countenance,
    ellauri270.html on line 252: For I am become a wife.' And drumlie grew his ee.
    ellauri270.html on line 255: And the tear blinded his ee: A league but barely three,
    ellauri270.html on line 256: 'I wad never hae trodden on Irish ground, Until she espied his cloven foot,
    ellauri270.html on line 274: 'I hae seven ships upon the sea- He strack up the tap-mast wi his hand,
    ellauri270.html on line 275: The eighth brought me to land- The fore-mast wi his knee,
    ellauri270.html on line 298: In The Daemon Lover, James (Jamie) Harris, a handsome author, deserts his dowdy 34-year old fiancée. The plot of this short story may be indebted to “The Demon Lover” by Elizabeth Bowen, whom Jackson ranked with Katherine Anne Porter as one of the best contemporary short story writers. When Jamie Harris disappears, he shatters his bride’s dreams of living in a “golden house in-the-country” (DL 12). Her shock of recognition that she will never trade her lonely city apartment for a loving home mirrors the final scenes of “The Lottery” and “The Pillar of Salt” as well as many other stories in which a besieged woman suffers a final and often fatal blow.
    ellauri270.html on line 300: In “The Daemon Lover,” the second story in The Lottery and Other Stories, Jackson’s collection of 25 tales, the reader sees James Harris only through his fiancée’s eyes as a tall man wearing a blue suit. Neither the reader nor anyone in the story can actually claim to have seen him. Nonetheless, this piece foreshadows the appearance of Harris in such other stories in the collection as “Like Mother Used to Make,” “The Village,” “Of Course,” “Seven Types of Ambiguities,” and “The Tooth.” As James Harris wanders through the book, he sheds the veneer of the ordinary that covers his satanic nature.
    ellauri270.html on line 302: The irony in “The Daemon Lover” is that the female protagonist becomes suspect as she hunts for the mysterious young man “who promised to marry her” (DL 23). Everywhere she searches, she encounters couples who mock her with not-so-subtle insinuations that she is crazy. Indeed, at the end of the story she may well have become insane; the narrative is ambiguous on this point. Significantly, however, if the nameless woman has indeed lost her mind, it is James who is responsible. Although some critics speculate that the disruptive male figure—both in this story and in the others in the collection—is a hallucination of a sexually repressed character, the epilogue to The Lottery, a ballad entitled “James Harris, The Daemon Lover,” suggests otherwise: He is, in fact, the devil himself.
    ellauri270.html on line 311: The morning of June 27th is a sunny, summer day with blooming flowers and green grass. In an unnamed village, the inhabitants gather in the town square at ten o’clock for an event called “the lottery.” In other towns there are so many people that the lottery must be conducted over two days, but in this village there are only three hundred people, so the lottery will be completed in time for the villagers to return home for noon dinner.
    ellauri270.html on line 313: This seemingly idyllic beginning establishes a setting at odds with the violent resolution of the story. Early details, such as sun and flowers, all have positive connotations, and establish the theme of the juxtaposition of peace and violence. The lottery is mentioned in the first paragraph, but not explained until the last lines.
    ellauri270.html on line 315: The children arrive in the village square first, enjoying their summer leisure time. Bobby Martin fills his pockets with stones, and other boys do the same. Bobby helps Harry Jones and Dickie Delacroix build a giant pile of stones and protect it from “raids” by other children. The girls stand talking in groups. Then adults arrive and watch their children’s activities. The men speak of farming, the weather, and taxes. They smile, but do not laugh. The women arrive, wearing old dresses and sweaters, and gossip amongst themselves. Then the women call for their children, but the excited children have to be called repeatedly. Bobby Martin runs back to the pile of stones before his father reprimands him and he quietly takes his place with his family.
    ellauri270.html on line 317: The children’s activities—gathering stones—have a false innocence about them. Because this resembles the regular play of children, the reader may not assume gathering stones is intended for anything violent. The word “raids,” however, introduces a telling element of violence and warfare into the children’s innocent games. Similarly, the reader is lulled into a false sense of security by the calm and innocuous activities and topics of conversation among the adult villagers. We see the villagers strictly divided along gendered lines, even as children.
    ellauri270.html on line 319: Mr. Summers, the man who conducts the lottery, arrives. He also organizes the river dances, the purity pledges, and the Halloween program, because he has time to devote to volunteering. He runs the coal business in town, but his neighbors pity him because his wife is unkind and the couple has no children. Mr. Summers arrives bearing a black box. He is followed by the postmaster, Mr. Graves, who caries a stool.
    ellauri270.html on line 321: Because of the innocuous nature of Mr. Summers’ other community activities, the lottery is assumed to be something in a similar vein. He is a successful businessman, but pitied because he can have no children—clearly this is a very family-oriented society.
    ellauri270.html on line 323: Mr. Graves sets the stool in the center of the square and the black box is placed upon it. Mr. Summers asks for help as he stirs the slips of paper in the box. The people in the crowd hesitate, but after a moment Mr. Martin and his oldest son Baxter step forward to hold the box and stool. The original black box from the original lotteries has been lost, but this current box still predates the memory of any of the villagers. Mr. Summers wishes to make a new box, but the villagers don’t want to “upset tradition” by doing so. Rumor has it that this box contains pieces of the original black box from when the village was first settled. The box is faded and stained with age.
    ellauri270.html on line 329: Even though the villagers value tradition, many of the specific parts of their traditions have been lost with time. This suggests that the original purpose of the lottery has also been forgotten, and the lottery is now an empty ritual, one enacted simply because it always has been. When we later learn the significance of the slips of paper, it seems horribly arbitrary that they are simply made by a person the night before.
    ellauri270.html on line 333: The lottery involves organizing the village by household, which reinforces the importance of family structures here. This structure relies heavily on gender roles for men and women, where men are the heads of households, and women are delegated to a secondary role and considered incapable of assuming responsibility or leadership roles. Horrible! Even though the setting of this story is a single town, it is generic enough that it might be almost anywhere. In doing this, Jackson essentially makes the story a fable—the ideas explored here are universal.
    ellauri270.html on line 343: Mr. Summers says that they had better get started and get this over with so that everyone can go back to work. He asks if anyone is missing and, consulting his list, points out that Clyde Dunbar is absent with a broken leg. He asks who will be drawing on his behalf. His wife steps forward, saying, “wife draws for her husband.” Mr. Summers asks—although he knows the answer, but he poses the question formally—whether or not she has a grown son to draw for her. Mrs. Dunbar says that her son Horace is only sixteen, so she will draw on behalf of her family this year.
    ellauri270.html on line 345: Mrs. Dunbar is the only woman to draw in the lottery, and the discussion of her role in the ritual proceedings emphasizes the theme of family structure and gender roles. Women are considered so inferior that even a teenaged son would replace a mother as the “head of household.” Wow this is going back to last century, or to Afghanistan! The formality surrounding these proceedings shows Mrs. Dunbar’s involvement to be an anomaly for the village.
    ellauri270.html on line 347: Mr. Summers asks if the Watson boy is drawing this year. Jack Watson raises his hand and nervously announces that he is drawing for his mother and himself. Other villagers call him a “good fellow” and state that they’re glad to see his mother has “got a man to do it.” Mr. Summers finishes up his questions by asking if Old Man Warner has made it. The old man declares “here” from the crowd.
    ellauri270.html on line 349: Jack Watson’s role continues the examination of family structures and gender roles. Jack earns respect and identity as a man among the villagers by drawing in the lottery. He is referred to as a “good fellow” and “a man” who is looking after his “helpless” mother.
    ellauri270.html on line 351: A hush falls over the crowd as Mr. Summers states that he’ll read the names aloud and the heads of families should come forward and draw a slip of paper from the box. Everyone should hold his paper without opening it until all the slips have been drawn. The crowd is familiar with the ritual, and only half-listens to these directions. Mr. Summers first calls “Adams,” and Steve Adams approaches, draws his slip of paper, and returns to his family, standing a little apart and not looking down at the paper.
    ellauri270.html on line 357: Snap shots of village life, like the conversation between Mrs. Delacroix and Mrs. Graves, develop the humanity of the characters and makes this seem just like any other small town where everyone knows each other. The small talk juxtaposed against murder (oops now I let the cat out of the bag, sorry) is what makes the story so powerful. Janey is taking on a “man’s role,” so she is assumed to need encouragement and support.
    ellauri270.html on line 361: The men’s nervousness foreshadows the lottery’s grim outcome. Tessie acts at odds with the pervasive mood, drawing laughs from the crowd. Tessie does not question the lottery at this point, and treats the proceedings lightheartedly—from a position of safety.
    ellauri270.html on line 363: In the crowd, Mr. Adams turns to Old Man Warner and says that apparently the north village is considering giving up the lottery. Old Man Warner snorts and dismisses this as foolish. He says that next the young folks will want everyone to live in caves or nobody to work. He references the old saying, “lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.” He reminds Mr. Adams that there has always been a lottery, and that it’s bad enough to see Mr. Summers leading the proceedings while joking with everybody. Mrs. Adams intercedes with the information that some places have already stopped the lotteries. Old Man Warner feels there’s “nothing but trouble in that.”
    ellauri270.html on line 365: The conversation between Mr. Adams and Old Man Warner establishes why the lottery is continued in this village, while it has been ended in others: the power of tradition. As the oldest man in the village, Old Man Warner links the lottery to traditional civilization, equating its removal to a breakdown of society and a return to a primitive state. For the villagers, the lottery demonstrates the organization and power of society—that is, a group of people submitting to shared rules in exchange for protection and support. But we see that the lottery also shows the arbitrariness and corruption of many of these social rules.
    ellauri270.html on line 367: Mrs. Dunbar says to her oldest son that she wishes everyone would hurry up, and Horace replies that they’re almost through the list of names. Mrs. Dunbar instructs him to run and tell his father once they’re done. When Old Man Warner is called to select his slip of paper, he says that this is his seventy-seventh lottery. When Jack Watson steps forward, he receives several comments from the crowd reminding him to not be nervous and to take his time.
    ellauri270.html on line 369: Mrs. Dunbar’s impatience, Old Man Warner’s pride, and Jack Watson’s coming-of-age moment show how integrated the lottery is into this society. No one questions the practice, and they all arrange their lives around it. Jackson shows how difficult it is to give up a tradition when everyone else conforms to it.
    ellauri270.html on line 371: Finally, the last man has drawn. Mr. Summers says, “all right, fellows,” and, after a moment of stillness, all the papers are opened. The crowd begins to ask who has it. Some begin to say that it’s Bill Hutchinson. Mrs. Dunbar tells her son to go tell his father who was chosen, and Horace leaves. Bill Hutchinson is quietly staring down at his piece of paper, but suddenly Tessie yells at Mr. Summers that he didn’t give her husband enough time to choose, and it wasn’t fair.
    ellauri270.html on line 375: Mrs. Delacroix tells Tessie to “be a good sport,” and Mrs. Graves reminds her “all of us took the same chance.” Bill Hutchinson tells his wife to “shut up.” Mr. Summers says they’ve got to hurry to get done in time, and he asks Bill if he has any other households in the Hutchinsons’ family. Tessie yells that there’s her daughter Eva and Eva’s husband Don, and says that they should be made to take their chance, too. Mr. Summers reminds her that, as she knows, daughters draw with their husband’s family. “It wasn’t fair,” Tessie says again.
    ellauri270.html on line 377: This passage shows the self-serving survival instinct of humans very clearly. Each person who speaks up is protecting his or her own skin, a survival instinct that Jackson shows to be natural to all the villagers, and by extension all humans. Tessie is willing to throw her daughter and son-in-law into harm’s way to have a better chance of saving herself. The other women are relieved to have not been chosen—no one speaks up against the lottery until they themselves are in danger.
    ellauri270.html on line 379: Bill Hutchinson regretfully agrees with Mr. Summers, and says that his only other family is “the kids.” Mr. Summers formally asks how many kids there are, and Bill responds that there are three: Bill Jr., Nancy, and little Davy. Mr. Graves takes the slips of paper back and puts five, including the marked slip of paper, in the black box. The others he drops on the ground, where a breeze catches them. Mrs. Hutchinson says that she thinks the ritual should be started over—it wasn’t fair, as Bill didn’t have enough time to choose his slip.
    ellauri270.html on line 383: Mr. Summers asks if Bill Hutchinson is ready, and, with a glance at his family, Bill nods. Mr. Summers reminds the Hutchinsons that they should keep their slips folded until each person has one. He instructs Mr. Graves to help little Davy. Mr. Graves takes the boy’s hand and walks with him up to the black box. Davy laughs as he reaches into the box. Mr. Summers tells him to take just one paper, and then asks Mr. Graves to hold it for him.
    ellauri270.html on line 385: Tessie’s protests have shown the reader that the outcome of the lottery will not be good. Little Davy’s inclusion reinforces the cruelty of the proceedings and the coldness of its participants. Little Davy is put at risk even when he is unable to understand the rituals or to physically follow the instructions. But so what? Is this one more case of "free will" stuffed down your throat?
    ellauri270.html on line 387: Nancy Hutchinson is called forward next, and her school friends watch anxiously. Bill Jr. is called, and he slips clumsily, nearly knocking over the box. Tessie gazes around angrily before snatching a slip of paper from the box. Bill selects the final slip. The crowd is silent, except for a girl who is overheard whispering that she hopes it’s not Nancy. Then Old Man Warner says that the lottery isn’t the way it used to be, and that people have changed.
    ellauri270.html on line 389: Even a dystopian society like this one doesn’t exclude other aspects of human nature like youth, popularity, friendship, and selfishness. Nancy’s behavior resembles that of many popular teen girls—again emphasizing the universal nature of Jackson’s story. We get the sense that Old Man Warner is perpetually displeased with any kind of change to tradition—even though the omniscient narrator tells us that the “tradition” Warner is used to is very different from the original lottery.
    ellauri270.html on line 391: Mr. Summers instructs the Hutchinsons to open the papers. Mr. Graves opens little Davy’s and holds it up, and the crowd sighs when it is clearly blank. Nancy and Bill Jr. open theirs together and both laugh happily, as they hold up the blank slips above their heads. Mr. Summers looks at Bill, who unfolds his paper to show that it is blank. “Tessie,” Mr. Summers says. Bill walks over to his wife and forces the slip of paper from her hand. It is the marked slip of paper with the pencil dot Mr. Summers made the night before.
    ellauri270.html on line 397: Mrs. Dunbar already sent her son away, perhaps to spare him having to participate in murder this year, and now she herself seems to try and avoid taking part in the lottery as well. The line about the stones makes an important point—most of the external trappings of the lottery have been lost or forgotten, but the terrible act at its heart remains. There is no real religious or practical justification for the lottery anymore—it’s just a primitive murder for the sake of tradition. Now the situation would be quite different if this were a real case of adultery, about which there are clear instructions in the Old Testament!
    ellauri270.html on line 399: The use of stones also connects the ritual to Biblical punishments of “stoning” people for various sins, which then brings up the idea of the lottery’s victim as a sacrifice. The idea behind most primitive human sacrifices was that something (or someone) must die in order for the crops to grow that year. This village has been established as a farming community, so it seems likely that this was the origin of the lottery. The horrifying part of the story is that the murderous tradition continues even in a seemingly modern, “normal” society. In actual fact, the point is to reduce the number of mouths to feed in times of shortage.
    ellauri270.html on line 417: The ritual of the lottery itself is organized around the family unit, as, in the first round, one member of a family selects a folded square of paper. The members of the family with the marked slip of paper must then each select another piece of paper to see the individual singled out within that family. This process reinforces the importance of the family structure within the town, and at the same time creates a….. read analysis of Family Structure and Gender Roles.
    ellauri270.html on line 421: The villagers in the story perform the lottery every year primarily because they always have—it’s just the way things are done. The discussion of this traditional practice, and the suggestion in the story that other villages are breaking from it by disbanding the lottery, demonstrates the persuasive power of ritual and tradition for humans. The lottery, in itself, is clearly pointless: an individual is killed after being randomly selected. Even the original ritual has been… read analysis of The Power of Tradition.
    ellauri270.html on line 436: Ezemmosta. Äsken tihrustettiin 1 osa espanjalaista rupusarjaa Karut kadut. Kirjeenvaihtotoverini Ypäjältä sanoi v. 1970 hyperkorrektisti kertovansa mulle "kadun totuuden", tarkoittaen karua. Semmoinen katu oli tänkin sarjan miljöönä, vaikka kaikki oli kuitenkin äärimmäisen epäuskottava koska kaikki hyvis näyttelijät oli sipisiistejä ja kuin olisivat vasta tulleet suihkusta, miinus muutamat pahis konnat jotka oli makilleerattu oikein karvaisixi ja pahoixi kuin el Zorro-sarjakuvissa. Hemmetti noi epsanjalaiset äijät ovat sovinistisikoja, ja rasistisia Kolumbiasta tulleille maahantunkeutujille. Neekereitä ei edes näytetty. Persuvanhuxet kärvistelee upporikkaiden ja rutiköyhien välivaiheilla ja ovat vähin erin valumassa kasan pohjalle. Tää oli tollanen Equalizer tai Clint Easton vanhana -tyyppinen vanhussankarisarja, äärimmäisen epäuskottava. Vanha pieni käppänä oli muka joku Bosnian sodan veteraani, mitä vittua, oliko siellä Jugoslaviassa ysärillä epsanjalaisiltakin Nato-joukkoja, kai sitten oli. Oikeastaan toivon että kiinalaiset alkaa pikapikaa lähettää Putinille aseita, jotta saadaan tää 3. maailmansota vauhtiin kunnolla, olis aika tehdä pallolla joltinenkin apuharvennus.
    ellauri270.html on line 443: Former Mariner High School teacher and boys basketball coach James Harris will be spending the next 11 years in state prison after he pleaded guilty in Lee County court on Monday to one count of sexual assault in a school. Harris, 46, had been charged with two counts stemming from his contact with a female student at Mariner in 2016. He allegedly had sex with the student in his classroom before moving the sexual relationship to his home. Court documents also show that Harris fathered a baby with a former student years earlier.
    ellauri270.html on line 445: In the assault case, Harris and the girl began communicating via text messages in the summer of 2016, when she was between 16 and 17 years of age, according to a Lee County Sheriff's Office report. The messages started out innocently but turned sexual in nature. Then Harris texted the girl asking for her presence in his classroom.
    ellauri270.html on line 448: Harris is the all-time winningest head coach in Mariner basketball history and has led his team to eight consecutive FHSAA state playoff appearances. His evaluations describe him as a teacher who worked well with students and was always willing to help out. However, he had trouble "demonstrating knowledge of content", according to an evaluation for the 2013-2014 school year. His "lesson plans are lacking basic elements and are difficult for others to follow," the evaluation states. But his lechery plan was straightforward and clear enough to follow.
    ellauri270.html on line 486: And are those two all, all the crew, Ja onko noi 2 koko miehistö,
    ellauri270.html on line 496: Quoth she, and whistled thrice Se sanoi, ja vihelsi kolmasti
    ellauri270.html on line 504: "Is it he? quoth one, "Is this the man? "Onxe se, sanoi 1, onx tää se mies?
    ellauri270.html on line 506: "With his cruel bow he lay'd full low "Joka ampui jouskarilla julmasti
    ellauri270.html on line 508: O dream of joy! is this indeed Oi onnen unta! Onko tää tosiaankin
    ellauri270.html on line 510: Is this the Hill? Is this the Kirk? kukkula? Onx tää sen kirkko?
    ellauri270.html on line 511: Is this mine own countrée? Onxtää mun Merikadun ikkuna?
    ellauri270.html on line 523: Published anonymously in 1798, this was meant to be perceived as a manuscript recently uncovered from an earlier age. It purposefully contains a variety of archaic spelling and syntax. Later editions modernized some of the archaisms.
    ellauri270.html on line 529: Enoch Arden, poem by Alfred, Lord Tennyson, published in 1864. In the poem, Enoch Arden is a happily married fisherman who suffers financial problems and becomes a merchant seaman. He is shipwrecked, and, after 10 years on a desert island, he returns home to discover that his beloved wife, believing him dead, has remarried and has a new child. Not wishing to spoil his wife’s happiness, he never lets her know that he is alive.
    ellauri270.html on line 544: A real war hero disobeys commands from his superiors to look after his own troops. Clan behavior, that is what it is. Vielä hullumpaa nokkimista on kun öykkärimäinen Judah Andersen tulee rähjäämään tontin omistajana ja vetää sitten kantapäät yhteen kolmen tähden war hero kenzun edessä. Just tällästä oli Kouvolassa kun paikallinen kansanedustaja tuli paikalle. Helskutti mitä pyllistelyä.
    ellauri270.html on line 548: "I'm sorry about getting in your face there, sir, but we get a lot of trespassers and thieves these days, what with the economy going to shit and all. The sheriff is doing his best, but this is a big county and a big ranch, and his department's been slashed to the bone... but its a good thing too, on the other hand, no big government you know. Like I said, we've had a lot of trespassers over the past couple years," Andorsen said. "Even had some cattle rustlers a while back." "And you like to deal with them yourself, instead of calling the sheriff?" Fid asked. He nodded. "Sounds like the way it should be done." "Bet your ass," Andorsen said. "Nothing beats taking the law in your own hands. Playing sheriff, judge and hangman in one big fat person. Personally, I like the hangman part best."
    ellauri270.html on line 550: "We gotta have min 2 cadets per min 2 adults at all times, for kld anus protection." "Amazing work. I'm proud of you guys. And you're volunteers. That's even more amazing. I've always believed in the spirit of the volunteer, the person who doesn't expect to be paid for his services. I can relate to that, I don't expect to pay for services myself. But General Patrick McLanahan working for nothing? How screwed up is that? Unbelievable!
    ellauri270.html on line 553:
    H. Norman Schwarzkopf, father of H. Norman Schwarzkopf. Served Pres. George Bush, father of Pres. George Bush. Naah, actually this guy died 1958.

    ellauri270.html on line 555: Herbert Norman Schwarzkopf Jr. USMA, KCB (/ˈʃwɔːrtskɒf/; August 22, 1934 – December 27, 2012) was a United States Army general. While serving as the commander of United States Central Command, he led all coalition forces in the Persian Gulf War. Schwarzkopf was highly decorated in Vietnam. He was one of the commanders of the invasion of Grenada in 1983. Schwarzkopf's command eventually grew to an international force of over 750,000 troops. Schwarzkopf graduated valedictorian out of his class of 150, and his IQ was tested at 168. Schwarzkopf then attended the United States Military Academy where he played football, wrestled, sang and conducted the West Point Chapel choir. His large frame (6 feet 3 inches (1.91 m) in height and 240 pounds (110 kg) in weight) was advantageous in athletics and bawling out his underlings. He was also a member of Mensa.
    ellauri270.html on line 557: At Fort Campbell, Kentucky, 1957, he found chronic problems in military leadership, amid what historians have called a larger doctrinal crisis. They were all commies to a man!
    ellauri270.html on line 558: In Vietnam 1969, his troops were demoralized and in poor condition, racked with rampant drug use and disciplinary problems as well as a lack of support from home. During his time in Vietnam, Schwarzkopf acquired his well-known short temper.
    ellauri270.html on line 561: Within 90 hours, his force had destroyed 42 of 50 Iraqi Army divisions at a cost of about 125 killed and 200 wounded among American troops, and about 482 killed, 458 wounded among all of the coalition. What a whackin' bloodbath. It restored pride in the US armed forces after the Vietnam War.
    ellauri270.html on line 563: Schwarzkopf's speaking fees topped $60K per public appearance. Schwarzkopf sold the rights to his memoirs to Bantam Books for $5M. On November 7, 1994, Schwarzkopf won $14K for the Boggy Creek Gang on Celebrity Jeopardy! He sold his cancerous prostata to charity for $1M.
    ellauri270.html on line 565: Schwarzkopf developed a reputation as a commander who preferred to lead from the front, even willing to risk his own life and his subordinates. But his most lasting and important legacies are the tremendous soldiers he failed to kill.
    ellauri270.html on line 567: Army Chief of Staff Carl E. Vuonohevonen, a lifelong friend of Schwarzkopf, described him as "competent, compassionate, egotistical, loyal, opinionated, funny, emotional, sensitive to any slight. At times he can be an overbearing bastard, but not with me." Sooty Colin Powell had to humor Herman with satin gloves because "Dick" Cheney could not stand his arse. What turds.
    ellauri270.html on line 595: Some have criticized Brandeis for evading issues related to African-Americans, as he did not author a single opinion on any cases about race during his twenty-three year tenure, and consistently voted with the court majority including in support of racial segregation.
    ellauri270.html on line 599: Frankism was a heretical Sabbatean Jewish religious movement of the 18th and 19th centuries, centered on the leadership of the Jewish Messiah claimant Jacob Frank, who lived from 1726 to 1791. Frank rejected religious norms and said that his followers were obligated to transgress as many moral boundaries as possible. At its height it claimed perhaps 50,000 followers, primarily Jews living in Poland, as well as in Central and Eastern Europe.
    ellauri270.html on line 601: According to biographer Melvin Urolofsky, Brandeis was influenced greatly by his uncle Lewis Naphtali Dembitz. Unlike other members of the extended Brandeis family, Dembitz regularly practiced Judaism and was actively involved in Zionist activities. Brandeis later changed his middle name from David to Dembitz in honor of his uncle, and through his uncle's model of social activism, became an active member of the Zionist movement later in his life.
    ellauri272.html on line 78: Kirsten Sims from New Zealand stated that the book "will win no prizes for its prose" and that "there are some exceedingly awful descriptions," although it was also an easy read; "(If you only) can suspend your disbelief and your desire to – if you'll pardon the expression – slap the heroine for having so little self respect, you might enjoy it." A Cord from U of Columbia stated that, "Despite the clunky prose, James does cause one to turn the page." Father Metro wrote that "suffering through 500 pages of this heroine's inner dialogue was torturous, and not in the intended, sexy kind of way". Jessica Reaves, the Chicago Tribune, wrote that the "book's source material isn't great literature", noting that the novel is "sprinkled liberally and repeatedly with asinine phrases", and described it as "depressing". Publishers Weekly named E. L. James the 'Publishing Person of the Year' 2012. In April 2012 E. L. James was listed as one of Time magazine's "100 Most Influential People in the World".
    ellauri272.html on line 80: Coinciding with the release of the book and its surprising popularity, injuries related to BDSM and sex toy use spiked dramatically. In the year after the novel's publishing in 2012, injuries requiring Emergency Room visits increased by over 50% from 2010 (the year before the book was published). This is speculated to be due to people unfamiliar with both the proper use of these toys and the safe practice of bondage and other "kinky" sexual fetishes in attempting to recreate at home what they had read.
    ellauri272.html on line 86: Operation Iraqui Freedom (OIF) offers direct support against communists so as to leur defendre le droit to access smutty information. If you’re able, please consider a donation to OIF to ensure this important work continues. But anyway, here's The 101 most banned and burned books in the U.S. of A! Näissä kaikissa on kyse nuorison korruptoinnista, samasta mistä Sokrates sai sen myrkkytuomion. Näiden kirjojen vika on erilaiset poikkeamat 7th heaven perhekomedian malliperheestä. Isiä ja äitejä tai sukupuolia on liikaa tai liian vähän, kaikki eivät tule ajoissa päivälliselle tai korvaavat terveellisen kotiruuan nestemäisellä ravinnolla tai tabuilla ja nousevat ylös tai menevät sänkyyn liian myöhään tai liian aikaisin tai ovat seisaaltaan, keittiosaarekkeella tai muuten sopimattomilla tavoilla. Juuri niitä aiheita jotka elähdyttävät Netflixin ja muiden suorasoittopalvelinten tarjontaa.
    ellauri272.html on line 170: This Day in June by Gayle E. Pitman
    ellauri272.html on line 172: This One Summer by Mariko Tamaki
    ellauri272.html on line 192: This Book is Gay by Juno Dawson
    ellauri272.html on line 294: about Junior's life on the Spokane Indian Reservation and his decision to go to a
    ellauri272.html on line 310: of the idealized child"; Alexie's protagonist is the opposite of this figure.
    ellauri272.html on line 315: Weyland suggests that the outsized effect of this feature of
    ellauri272.html on line 322: to be killed rather than taken to the vet, because his parents were poor and they
    ellauri272.html on line 395: Tässä tapauksessa presidentiltä lienee yksinkertaisesti mennyt sekaisin samankaltaisesti lausuttavat Finnish- ja penis-sanat. Niinistön lausunnoissa on lukuisia muitakin lipsahduxia: esimerkiksi viittaus Kiovaan (Kyiv) oli vaihtunut epähuomiossa nimeksi Keith. Keithistä ei todellakaan ollut tarkoitus tässä mainita! suhautti Biden väliin suuttuneesti.
    ellauri272.html on line 408: Ammons wrote about humanity's relationship to nature in alternately comic and solemn tones. His poetry often addresses religious and philosophical matters and scenes involving nature, almost in a Transcendental fashion. According to reviewer Daniel Hoffman, his work "is founded on an implied Emersonian division of experience into Nature and the Soul," adding that it "sometimes consciously echoes familiar lines from Emerson, Whitman and Dickinson."[citation needed]
    ellauri272.html on line 414: Critics tracing his creative genealogy are apt to begin with Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau and work chronologically forward through Walt Whitman, Ezra Pound, Robert Frost, Wallace Stevens, and William Carlos Williams. Of those poets, Harold Bloom felt that the transcendentalists Emerson and Whitman have influenced Ammons the most. Xcept he overdoes the colon. Radical colectomy is indicated.
    ellauri272.html on line 416: M.L. Rosenthal felt that although Ammons shares Wallace Stevens’s desire to intellectualize rather than simply describe, he falls short of Stevens’s success. Paul Zweig agrees that “unlike T.S. Eliot or Stevens, Ammons does not write well about ideas.” When the narrator finds the dead mole under the leaves, he says, “mercy: I’d just had / lunch: squooshy ice cream: I nearly / unhad it.” Vendler commented, “There has been nothing like this in American poetry before Ammons—nothing with this liquidity of folk voice.”
    ellauri272.html on line 420: Ammons’s concerns with the transcendental everyman coalesce in what may prove to be his finest effort: the National Book Award winner of 1993, Garbage. The title, suggested when Ammons drove by a Florida landfill, is characteristically flippant and yet perfectly serious. “Garbage is a brilliant book,” said David Baker in the Kenyon Review. “It may very well be a great one. ...
    ellauri272.html on line 423: Elizabeth Lund of the Christian Science Monitor criticized Ammons for his tendency to jump “unexpectedly from one image or idea to another.” It is simply a kind of disposable diaper poetry.
    ellauri272.html on line 569: Jack Hyde : Anan entinen pomo ja tärkein antagonisti. (pahis)
    ellauri272.html on line 660: Ana herää kolme päivää myöhemmin sairaalassa Christianin kanssa. Vaikka hän on vihainen Anan piittaamattomuudesta ja edelleen huolissaan isyydestä, hän ymmärtää, kuinka tärkeä heidän vauvansa on hänelle, ja he tekevät sovinnon. Ana palaa kotiin seuraavana päivänä. Christian saa tietää yksityisetsivästään Welchistä, että hänellä ja Hydellä oli sama sijaisperhe. Hän kertoo Analle kuinka hän tapasi ja Elena vietteli hänet. Esittelemällä hänet BDSM:n maailmaan Elena auttoi Christiania oppimaan hallitsemaan elämäänsä. Jos hän ei olisi puuttunut asiaan, häntä vaivasivat edelleen hirvittävät muistot äidistään, eikä hän olisi koskaan kyennyt hallitsemaan elämäänsä. Ana tuntee syyllisyyttä käytöksestään, kun hän selittää, kuinka hän päätyi näkemään Elenan. Hän oli etsinyt psykiatriaan, tohtori Flynnin, koska hän tarvitsi apua ja kun hän ei voinut ottaa yhteyttä Flynnin, Christian päätyi Elenan salongiin puhuakseen jollekin ongelmistaan. Elena sattui olemaan salongissa sulkiessaan. Hän tiesi, että Christian ja Ana olivat riidelleet raskaudesta. Elena vei hänet suosikkibaariinsa juomaan ja auttamaan häntä rentoutumaan. Vaikka Elena antoi hänelle passin, hän tajusi, että Christian rakasti Anaa ja suostui lopulta lähtemään hyvillä ehdoilla. Hän vakuuttaa hänelle, että hän teki oikein kutsuessaan häntä esiin tämän käytöksestä, koska tohtori Flynn oli ollut oikeassa, että hänellä on vielä paljon kasvamista tehtävää. Elena tajusi, että Christian rakasti Anaa ja suostui lopulta lähtemään hyvillä ehdoilla. Hän vakuuttaa hänelle, että hän teki oikein kutsuessaan häntä esiin tämän käytöksestä, koska tohtori Flynn oli ollut oikeassa, että hänellä on vielä paljon kasvamista tehtävää. Elena tajusi, että Christian rakasti Anaa ja suostui lopulta lähtemään hyvillä ehdoilla. Hän vakuuttaa hänelle, että hän teki oikein kutsuessaan häntä esiin tämän käytöksestä, koska tohtori Flynn oli ollut oikeassa, että hänellä on vielä paljon kasvamista tehtävää.
    ellauri274.html on line 65: Tämän päivän viestin puhun vaikeassa paikassa me kaikki tiedämme sen hyvin. Elämme vaikeita aikoja ystävä hyvä. Maamerkkiaika maallemme kardinaalimunauxen peruuttamattoman aikana. Se muuttaa ympäri maailmaa tärkeimmät historialliset tapahtumat, jotka määrää maamme ja kansamme tulevaisuus, kun jokainen meistä valehtelee. Siis kun jokainen muukin valehtelee meistä. Whatever.
    ellauri274.html on line 81: 1:17:13 перемен во всем мире важнейших исторических событий которые определяют1:17:13 muuttaa ympäri maailmaa tärkeimmät historialliset tapahtumat, jotka määräävät
    ellauri274.html on line 83: 1:17:27 колоссальная ответственность год назад ради защиты людей на наших исторических1:17:27 valtava vastuu vuosi sitten ihmisten suojelemisesta historiallisellamme
    ellauri274.html on line 186: 1:28:43 целью оторвать исторические эти исторические территории которые сегодня 1:28:43 tarkoituksena repiä pois nämä nykyiset historialliset alueet
    ellauri274.html on line 234: 1:33:48 конечно молодых людей молодые поколения и и здесь опять лгут постоянно извращают исторические 1:33:48 tietysti nuoret, nuoret sukupolvet ja täällä taas he valehtelevat jatkuvasti vääristäen historiaa
    ellauri274.html on line 267: 1:37:37 которые чувства которые исторически присущи нашему народу 1:37:37 mitkä tunteet ovat historiallisesti luontaisia ​​ihmisillemme
    ellauri274.html on line 312: 1:42:58 за это за своих предков за будущее детей внуков за восстановление исторической 1:42:58 tätä varten esi-isilleen lastensa ja lastenlastensa tulevaisuuden puolesta historiallisen ennallistamisen puolesta
    ellauri274.html on line 446: 1:57:53 в современной истории нашей страны превысили 100 миллионов квадратных 1:57:53 maamme nykyhistoriassa ovat ylittäneet 100 miljoonaa neliötä
    ellauri274.html on line 486: 2:02:03 независимого развития вопреки любому внешнему давлению и угрозам с 2:02:03 itsenäiseen kehitykseen huolimatta ulkoisista paineista ja uhista
    ellauri274.html on line 648: 2:19:45 государства и главное окончательно добить Россию Как самую большую сохранившуюся часть нашего исторического 2:19:45 ja mikä tärkeintä, lopuksi viimeistelemään Venäjän historiamme suurimmaksi säilyneeksi osaksi
    ellauri274.html on line 714: 2:27:29 поддержания одного исторического высшего права право России быть сильной 2:27:29 säilyttää yksi historiallinen korkein oikeus, Venäjän oikeus olla vahva
    ellauri274.html on line 740: 2:30:39 культурному историческому образовательному пространству многовековой великой России 2:30:39 vuosisatoja vanhan suuren Venäjän kulttuurihistoriallinen koulutustila
    ellauri274.html on line 742: 2:30:54 гуманитарным наукам прежде всего история обществознанию литературе географии чтобы молодежь могла как можно больше 2:30:54 humanistiset tieteet, ennen kaikkea historia, yhteiskuntaoppi, kirjallisuus, maantiede, jotta nuoret voivat tehdä mahdollisimman paljon
    ellauri274.html on line 776: 2:34:30 считаю особенно если у нас безработица сократилось исторического минимума 3,7 2:34:30 Luulen, että varsinkin jos työttömyytemme on pudonnut historiallisen alimmalle tasolle 3,7
    ellauri275.html on line 65: Apinaheppuli oli Stalinkin, naisen tekemä, vaikkakin luonteeltaan kelju ja raaka kaveri. Huovis-Veikko ei ollut mikään marxilainen, äänesti todennäköisesti kökkäreitä. Siitä huolimatta Huovisen historian taju on erinomainen, lähes yhtä jämäkkä kuin Veijo Meren.
    ellauri275.html on line 89: Isä Christopher Zuggerin mukaan yhdeksän serviittilähetyssaarnaajaa Konstantinopolista, eksarkki Shio Batmanishvilin johdolla, tuli Gruusian demokraattiseen tasavaltaan vakiinnuttamaan siellä pysyvästi Bysantin riitin vanhalla Gruusian kielellä, ja vuoteen 1929 mennessä heidän uskollistensa määrä oli kasvanut 8 000:een. Traagisesti heidän tehtävänsä päättyi, kun Neuvostoliiton salainen poliisi pidätti Exarch Shion ja hänen papit vuonna 1928, vangitsivat heidät Gulagiin Solovkin vankileirille ja murhasivat heidät myöhemmin Josif Stalinin NKVD:n toimesta Sandarmokhissa vuonna 1937.
    ellauri275.html on line 97: The Europe-Georgia Institute (EGI) is the leading hybrid warfare independent civil society organization in Georgia. Our mission is to advance "democracy", "human rights", "rule of law", and - first and foremost - free markets in Georgia and the Caucasus, and to empower a new generation of leaders to find solutions that are essential for Georgia’s development and for successful common future of the Caucasus. Our mission is to inspire, motivate, empower, and connect people to change their world. Its founder, one Melashvili, is the holder of the first prize award for his essay about Janri Kashia’s book “Totalitarianism” and Mikheil Javakhishvili Medal for a documentary film about Soviet repressions.
    ellauri275.html on line 331: Sinun kauhistuksessasi? Olet ihminen
    ellauri275.html on line 448: The period of publication was sandwiched between the Victorian era, with its strict classicism, and Modernism, with its strident rejection of pure aestheticism. The common features of the poems in these publications were romanticism, sentimentality, and hedonism. Later critics have attempted to revise the definition of the term as a description of poetic style, thereby including some new names or excluding some old ones. W. H. Davies, a contemporary, is sometimes included within the grouping, although his "innocent style" differs markedly from that of the others.
    ellauri275.html on line 453: Chavchavadze's influence over Georgian literature was immense. He moved the Georgian poetic language closer to the vernacular, combining the elements of the formal wealth and somewhat artificial antiquated "high" style inherited from the 18th-century Georgian Renaissance literature, melody of Persian lyrical poetry, particularly Hafiz and Saadi, bohemian language of the streets of Tiflis and the moods and themes of European Romanticism. The subject of his works varied from purely anacreontic in his early period to deeply philosophic in his maturity.
    ellauri275.html on line 455: Chavchavadze's contradictory career – his participation in the struggle against the Russian control of Georgia, on one hand, and the loyal service to the tsar, including the suppression of Georgian peasant revolts, on the other hand – found a noticeable reflection in his writings. The year 1832, when the Georgian plot collapsed, divides his work into two principal periods. Prior to that event, his poetry was mostly impregnated with laments for the former grandeur of Georgia, the loss of national independence and his personal grievances connected with it; his native country under the Russian empire seemed to him a prison, and he pictured its present state in extremely gloomy colors. The death of his beloved friend and son-in-law, Griboyedov, also contributed to the depressive character of his writings of that time.
    ellauri275.html on line 460: In his Romantic poems, Chavchavadze dreamed of Georgia's glorious past, when "the breeze of life past" would "breathe sweetness" into his "dry soul." In poems Woe, time, time (ვაჰ, დრონი, დრონი), Listen, listener (ისმინეთ მსმენნო), and Caucasia (კავკასია), the "Golden Age" of medieval Georgia was contrasted with its unremarkable present. As a social activist, however, he remained mostly a "cultural nationalist," defender of the native language, and an advocate of the interest of Georgian aristocratic and intellectual elites. In his letters, Alexander heavily criticized Russian treatment of Georgian national culture and even compared it with the pillaging by Ottomans and Persians who had invaded Georgia in the past. In one of the letters he states: The damage which Russia has inflicted on our nation is disastrous. Even Persians and Turks could not abolish our Monarchy and deprive us of our statehood. We have exchanged one serpent for another.
    ellauri275.html on line 462: After 1832, his perception of the national problems became different. The poet unambiguously pointed out those positive results which had been brought about by the Russian annexation, though the liberation of his native land remained to be his most cherished dream. Later, his poetry became less romantic, even sentimental, but he never abandoned his optimistic streak that makes his writings so different from those of his predecessors. Some of the most original of his late poems are, Oh, my dream, why have you appealed to me again (ეჰა, ჩემო ოცნებავ, კვლავ რად წარმომედგინე), and The Ploughman (გუთნის დედა) written in the 1840s. The former, a rather sad poem, surprisingly ends with hope for the future in contemplation of the poet. The latter combines Chavchavadze's elegy for his past years of youth with calm humorous farewell to lost sex-life and potency. Composer Tamara Antonovna Shaverzashvili used Chavchavadze’s text for her song “My Sadness.”
    ellauri275.html on line 519: Aleksei Kosyginin, Nikolai Podgornyin, Aleksandr Šelepinin ja Anastas Mikojanin organisoima kaappaus poisti Hruštšovin vallasta tämän ollessa lomalla. Brežnev osallistui kaappaukseen 14. lokakuuta 1964. Brežnev nimitettiin Hruštšovin tilalle Neuvostoliiton kommunistisen puolueen pääsihteeriksi, Aleksei Kosygin ministerineuvoston puheenjohtajaksi eli pääministeriksi ja Mikojan korkeimman neuvoston puhemiehistön puheenjohtajaksi ennen jäämistään eläkkeelle 1965. Eläköityneen Mikojanin korvasi niin sanotussa "troikassa" Nikolai Popcornyi.
    ellauri275.html on line 610: 1968 ei hajallaan olevilla epäkekkoslaisilla ollut mitään mahista, rannalle jäivät KOP:n Matti Virkkunen ja SMP:n Veikko Vennamo. Urkin ikä on helppo laskea, se syntyi 1900.
    ellauri275.html on line 627: Laureenska häläjää Putinin puheen puuroisuudesta, muttei vaivaudu kertomaan mistä Putin oikeasti puhui, nimittäin taloudesta. Venällä on Voldemortin mukaan mennyt suhteellisen hyvin raivokkaista talouspakotteista huolimatta: hyvä sato, lähes täystyöllisyys (3%), talouskasvu rohisee ja ruplan tie eeku paranee. Mixei tästä puhuta, vaan sensijaan siteerataan jotain ryssävihamielistä raakkujaa, joka väittää lainausmerkeissä että "Venäjän talous on pankrotin partaalla". Oravat puhuvat ristiin, eikö teistäkin? No se on tyypillistä kun porukat eivät ymmärrä toisiaan, sanoisi tähän viestintäasiantuntijamme Nilqvist.
    ellauri275.html on line 637: Sarja myös osoitti, että hyvän, jännän ja koskettavan rikossarjan voi tehdä ilman a) yhtään toimintasankaria, varsinkaan yhtään moniongelmaista ezivää ja sen paria, b) näyttämättä yhtään verta, puukotusta, silmitöntä väkivaltaa, tappoa c) yhtään car chasea, kiireellistä hälytystä rikospaikalle, pyssynheilutusta pimeillä parkkipaikoilla ja hylätyissä tehtaissa, d) yhtään panoa tai muuta vähissä vaatteissa suoritettavaa sukupuoliaktia, e) yhtään muoviselle taululle tehtyä epäiltyjen valokuvakollaasia, yxinkertaisesti pysymällä asiassa ja kuvaamalla tavan tallaajia niiden tavallisissa epädramaattisissa ympäristöissä. Juuri tekijöiden a)-e) ja muun tavanomaisen poliisisarjaklisheistön poissaolo oli sarjan onnistumisen ja myös sen uskottavuuden salaisuus.
    ellauri275.html on line 671: Neuvostoliiton historioitsijat pitivät Georgian ja Neuvosto-Venäjän välistä konfliktia osana Venäjän sisällissotaa, johon ympärysvallat sekaantuivat. Puna-armeijan hyökkäys oli virallisen neuvostoversion mukaan vastaus avunpyyntöön, joka seurasi Georgian työläisten ja talonpoikien aseellista kapinaa. Käyttäen kontrolliaan koulutuksessa ja mediassa neuvostohallinto loi onnistuneesti kuvan populaarista sosialistisesta vallankumouksesta.
    ellauri276.html on line 228: Hän syntyi Voronezhissa, Ukrainan koillispuolella, karjakauppiaan pojuna. Opiskeltuaan alle kaksi vuotta paikallisessa koulussa (1818-1820), Aleksey erosi isänsä vaatimuksesta, joka halusi hänen apuaan liiketoiminnassaan. Koltsov muutti, osti ja myi karjaa; ja sillä välin kirjoitti runoja salaa isältään.
    ellauri276.html on line 342:
    2 Josephia ja Adam English Campbellin yliopistosta, N.C. Hilpeästä Josephista on lujasti kuvia, irkkua sai eziä.
    ellauri276.html on line 353: Hänestä tuli Sinn Féinin kaupunginvaltuutettu Wicklow´ssa vuonna 1921. Myöhemmin Irlannin sisällissodassa hän oli republikaanien puolella, ja hänet internoitiin vuonna 1922/3. Hänen avioliitonsa hajosi, ja hän muutti Yhdysvaltoihin vuonna 1925. Siellä hän asui New Yorkissa. Hän luennoi Fordhamin yliopistossa ja työskenteli akateemisissa irlantilaistutkimuksissa perustaen yliopiston Irlannin tutkimuksen koulun vuonna 1928, joka kesti neljä vuotta. Hän oli toimittaja The Irish Review, lyhytikäinen (huhti-, touko- ja heinäkuu 1934) "irlantilaisen ilmaisun aikakauslehti". Yritysjohtaja oli George G. Lennon, entinen upseeri, joka komensi Waterfordin lentävää pylvästä Irlannin itsenäisyyssodan aikana. Päätoimittaja oli Lennonin vävy George H. Sherwood. Campbell palasi Irlantiin vuonna 1939, asettui Glencreeen, Wicklow´n kreivikuntaan, ja kuoli Lacken Daraghissa, Enniskerryssä 6. kesäkuuta 1944.
    ellauri276.html on line 476: Vuonna 1942 hän julkaisi pitkän runonsa Suuri nälkä, joka kuvaa hänen tuntemansa maaseutuelämän puutteita ja vaikeuksia. Vaikka tuolloin huhuttiin, että Garda Síochána takavarikoi Horizonin, kirjallisuuslehden, jossa se julkaistiin, kopiot, Kavanagh kiisti tämän tapahtuneen ja sanoi myöhemmin, että kaksi Gardía vain vieraili hänen kotonaan (luultavasti erityisvaltuuksia koskevan lain mukaisen Horizon- tutkimuksen yhteydessä). Yksittäisen talonpojan näkökulmasta historiallisen nälänhädän ja emotionaalisen epätoivon taustalla kirjoitettu runo on kriitikoiden mielestä usein Kavanaghin hienoin teos. Se pyrki vastustamaan irlantilaisen kirjallisen laitoksen sakarimaista romantisointia sen näkemyksessä talonpoikien elämästä. Richard Murphy The New York Times Book Review -lehdessä kuvaili sitä "suureksi teokseksi" ja Robin Skelton Poetryssa ylisti sitä "näkemykseksi myyttisestä intensiivisyydestä".
    ellauri276.html on line 488: Toiseksi, pian sen jälkeen, kun Kavanagh hävisi tämän tapauksen, hänellä diagnosoitiin keuhkosyöpä ja hänet vietiin sairaalaan, jossa häneltä poistettiin keuhko. Toipuessaan tästä leikkauksesta rentoutumalla Grand Canalin rannalla Dublinissa Kavanagh löysi uudelleen runollisen näkemyksensä. Hän alkoi arvostaa luontoa ja ympäristöään ja sai niistä inspiraatiota moniin myöhempiin runoihinsa. Elvis Costellosta ja Kavanaghista tuli lopulta hyviä ystäviä, ja Kavanagh huomautti äänestäneensä häntä oikeudenkäynnin jälkeen.
    ellauri276.html on line 495: Kavanagh meni naimisiin pitkäaikaisen kumppaninsa Katherine Barry Moloneyn ( Kevin Barryn veljentytär ) huhtikuussa 1967, ja he perustivat yhdessä pubin Waterloo Roadille Dubliniin. Kavanagh sairastui Tarry Flynnin ensiesityksessä Abbey Theatre -yhtiön Dundalkin kaupungintalossa ja kuoli muutamaa päivää myöhemmin, 30. marraskuuta 1967 Dublinissa. Hänen hautansa on Inniskeenissä Patrick Kavanagh -keskuksen vieressä. Hänen vaimonsa Katherine kuoli vuonna 1989; hän on myös haudattu sinne. Nobel-palkittu Séamus Heaney on saanut vaikutteita Kavanaghista. Heaney ja Kavanagh uskoivat paikallisen tai seurakuntalaisen kykyyn paljastaa universaali. Heaney sanoi kerran, että Kavanaghin runoudella oli "muuttava vaikutus yleiseen kulttuuriin ja se vapautti hänen jälkeensä tulleiden runollisten sukupolvien lahjat". Heaney totesi: "Kavanagh on todella edustava moderni hahmo siinä mielessä, että hänen kumouksellinen toimintansa käännettiin itsensä puoleen: tyytymättömyys, sekä henkinen että taiteellinen, inspiroi hänen kasvuaan... Hänen opetuksensa ja esimerkkinsä auttoivat meitä näkemään olennaisen eron hänen välillään. kutsutaan seurakunnalliseksi ja maakunnalliseksi mentaliteetiksi". Kuten Kavanagh sanoi: "Kaikki suuret sivilisaatiot perustuvat seurakuntaan". Hän päättelee, että Kavanaghin runous todistaa hänen "lankattoman uskonsa itseensä ja taiteeseen, joka teki hänestä paljon enemmän kuin hän itse".
    ellauri276.html on line 540: With hym ther was a Plowman, was his broother,
    ellauri276.html on line 544: God loved he best with al his hoole herte whole
    ellauri276.html on line 546: And thanne his neighebore right as hymselve. just as
    ellauri276.html on line 549: Withouten hyre, if it lay in his myght. payment; (see note)
    ellauri276.html on line 551: Both of his propre swynk and his catel. own work; possessions
    ellauri276.html on line 577: For his breath smells as sweet as a rose, a rose, a rose, Hänen hengityksensä tuoksuu makealta kuin ruusu, ruusu, ruusu
    ellauri276.html on line 579: A ploughman in his shirt he completely does his work, Paidassa kyntäjä, hän tekee työnsä täysin,
    ellauri276.html on line 587: And so merrily he will swing his hammer round, around, around, ja niin hauskaa, että hän heiluttaa vasaraa ympäri, ympäri, ympäri,
    ellauri276.html on line 588: And so merrily he'll swing his hammer round. ja niin iloisesti hän heiluttaa vasaraansa.
    ellauri276.html on line 595:

    English Folk Songs [1959] / track 49 Historical Folk. Henry Burstow sang The Ploughman in 1909 to Ralph Vaughan Williams [ VWML RVW2/2/194 ]. This version was printed in 1959 in Vaughan Williams' and Lloyd's The Penguin Book of English Folk Songs, which commented: This song started out, as some songs will, with intent to end otherwise. Mr Burstow's first verse was originally:
    ellauri276.html on line 603: Here we are on familiar ground, for the beginning is that of the well-known Condescending Lass, often printed on broadsides, and not infrequently met with in the mouths of country singers to this day. The Condescending Lass belongs to a sizeable family of songs on the theme “I wouldn't marry a …”. In it the girl reviews men of various trades, and rejects them all until she finds one whom she will deign to consider. But the present version loses sight of this theme, and from verse two onwards forgets all about the persnickety girl, settling down to a eulogy of the ploughman's trade, though here and there the words still recall those of The Condescending Lass. For the sake of coherence we have abandoned Mr Burstow's first verse and given it another title (he called it: Pretty Wench). The Taverners Folk Group sang The Ploughman in 1974 on their Folk Heritage album Times of Old England. They noted:
    ellauri276.html on line 608: Turning over frozen earth in dark January days behind a horse drawn or an ox drawn plough, must have been back breaking labour. The hours were long, pay was poor. A ploughman at the Alnwick Hiring Fair of spring 1819 for instance, was offered merely bed and food as payment for his fee for six months work. In the depression of that year, the ploughman had no choice, yet, these ploughmen appeared to enjoy their job and approached life with a sense of honest reality and humour. Their songs are nearly always cheerful. Cyril Tawney sang The Ploughman in 1974 on the Argo anthology The World of the Countryside. Jon Loomes sang The Ploughman in 2005 on his Fellside CD Fearful Symmetry. He noted:
    ellauri276.html on line 610: In this jolly little anthem to the delights of the rural lifestyle, our agrarian hero attributes his personal desirability to a diet of booze and fags. I got this from The Penguin Book of English Folk Songs which has recently been reprinted and improved—it now has a picture of Eliza Carthy on the front instead of a bloke forcing a bear to dance by poking it with a stick.
    ellauri276.html on line 623: There was an old farmer in Sussex did dwell, (whistle) Sussexissa asui vanha maanviljelijä, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 628: The Devil he came to the old man at plough, (whistle) Pirupa tuli vanhan miehen luo kynnökselle, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 632: Now it isn´t for you nor yet for your son, (whistle) Nyt se ei ole sinulle eikä vielä pojallesi, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 636: Oh take her, oh take her with all of my heart, (whistle) Oi ota hänet, oi ota hänet koko sydämestäni, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 640: So the devil he took the old wife on his back, (whistle) Niin paholainen otti vanhan vaimon selkäänsä, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 644: He trudged along ´til he reached his front gate, (whistle) Hän ronttasi eteenpäin, kunnes saavutti etuporttinsa, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 647: There was thirteen imps all dancing in chains; (whistle) Paikalla oli kolmetoista impeä, jotka kaikki tanssivat ketjuissa; (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 651: Two more little devils jumped over the wall, (whistle) Kaksi muuta pientä pirua hyppäsi seinän yli, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 655: So he bundled her up on his back amain, (whistle) Niin hän nippusi hänet selkäänsä uudestaan, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 659: I´ve been a tormentor the whole of my life, ( whistle) Olen ollut kiusaaja koko ikäni, (pilli)
    ellauri276.html on line 663: And now to conclude and make an end, (whistle) Ja nyt päättääkseni ja tehdäkseni lopun, (villi)
    ellauri276.html on line 670: https://www.letssingit.com/historical-folk-lyrics-the-devil-and-the-ploughman-g9dd5cr
    ellauri276.html on line 682: His garters knit below his knee, Hänen sukkanauhansa neulotaan polven alle
    ellauri276.html on line 696: And I will dress his o´erlay; ja puen hänen peittonsa;
    ellauri276.html on line 705: Snaw-white stocking on his legs, Lumenvalkoiset sukat jaloissa,
    ellauri276.html on line 707: A gude blue bannet on his head, Sininen konepelti päässä
    ellauri276.html on line 751: Mutta meret välillämme kohisevat
    ellauri276.html on line 802: This year it bears the gleamy grain; Tänä vuonna se kantaa hohtavaa viljaa;
    ellauri276.html on line 816: With this tuberculosis and all. Kun on tää tubikin ja kaikkea.
    ellauri276.html on line 853: This is the page whose letters shall be seen, Tämä on sivu, jonka kirjaimet tulevat näkyviin,
    ellauri276.html on line 859: This is the scholar whose immortal pen Tämä on tutkija, jonka kuolematon kynä
    ellauri276.html on line 862: Shows on his deed, - the charter of the soil! Näkyy hänen teossaan, - maaperän peruskirja!
    ellauri276.html on line 982: Cecil Sharp huomautti, että "Melkein jokainen laulaja tuntee Kaikki iloiset kaverit, jotka seuraa auraa: huonot laulajat eivät tiedä muuta". Ei sillä, että Gordon Syrett olisi tietenkään kuulunut tähän kategoriaan, ja Sharp oli varmasti oikeassa siinä, että harvat kantrikananlaulukokoelmat eivät sisällä tätä kappaletta. Melkein kaikki ovat samassa sävelessä, joka on muunnelma kaikkialla esiintyvästä Villikinsistä ja hänen Dinahistaan .
    ellauri276.html on line 990: Cecil Sharp huomautti, että "Melkein jokainen laulaja tuntee Kaikki iloiset kaverit jotka seuraa auraa: huonot laulajat eivät usein tiedä juurikaan muuta." Ei sillä, että Jeff sopisi tähän kategoriaan tietenkään! Itse asiassa hänen versionsa on epätavallinen, koska siinä on mielenkiintoinen erilainen sävel. Tavallisempi sävelmä on itse asiassa versio kaikkialla esiintyvistä Villikinsistä ja Dinahista. Sharp oli tietysti oikeassa, ja harvassa on kananlaulukokoelmia, jotka eivät sisällä versiota tästä sävelestä.
    ellauri276.html on line 997: Saaristolainen historioitsija Alan Phillips antoi meille vihjeen tästä laulusta, jota laulettiin vielä 1950-luvulla Brightstonessa – tässä tapauksessa Brookin Bob Cassell. Bob Cassell oli osa voimakasta West Wightin lauluperinnettä, jonka keskipisteenä olivat The New Inn at Brighstone ja The Sun Inn at Hulverstone. Tämän perinteen kaiut jatkuvat Graham Keepingin upeassa laulussa. Versiossamme käytetään Hampshiren sävelmää ja sanoja, jotka julkaistiin Lucy Broadwoodin Englanninkielisessä County Songsissa (1893).
    ellauri276.html on line 1015: Down came the farmer with a smile on his face Alas tuli maanviljelijä hymy huulillaan
    ellauri276.html on line 1051: “What have you been doing boys, all this long day? "Mitä olette tehneet pojat, koko tämän pitkän päivän?
    ellauri276.html on line 1055: I stepped up to him and made this reply, Astuin hänen luokseen ja vastasin:
    ellauri276.html on line 1066: Take this advice and be ruled by me, ottakaa tämä neuvo ja olkaa minun hallitsemia,
    ellauri276.html on line 1077: What have you been doing this long summer´s day? Mitä olet tehnyt tänä pitkänä kesäpäivänä?
    ellauri276.html on line 1122: “What have you been doing this very long day? ”Mitä sinä olet tehnyt tänä hyvin pitkänä päivänä?
    ellauri276.html on line 1126: And then I turned around and I made this reply, Ja sitten käännyin ympäri ja vastasin:
    ellauri276.html on line 1135: Come take this advice and be ruled by me: tulkaa noudattamaan tätä neuvoa ja olkaa minun hallitsemia:
    ellauri276.html on line 1160: “What have you been doing, boys, all this ere long day? "Mitä olette tehneet, pojat, koko tämän pitkän päivän?
    ellauri276.html on line 1161: You've not ploughed an acre this long summer's day. Et ole kyntänyt hehtaariakaan tänä pitkänä kesäpäivänä.
    ellauri276.html on line 1165: I stepped right up to him and made this reply, Astuin hänen luokseen ja vastasin:
    ellauri276.html on line 1176: Pray take this advice, this advice take from me; Rukoilen, ottakaa tämä neuvo, ottakaa tämä neuvo minulta;
    ellauri276.html on line 1200: Now the Master came to us and this he did say, Nyt Mestari tuli luoksemme ja tämän hän sanoi:
    ellauri276.html on line 1201: “You've not ploughed an acre this long summer's day. "Et ole kyntänyt hehtaariakaan tänä pitkänä kesäpäivänä.
    ellauri276.html on line 1205: I stepped up to him and made this reply, Astuin hänen luokseen ja vastasin:
    ellauri276.html on line 1210: He turned himself round and he laughed at his joke Hän kääntyi ympäri ja nauroi vitsilleen
    ellauri276.html on line 1237: Then with whistling and singing, I'll swear and I'll vow, Sitten viheltäessä ja laulaen vannon ja vannoen:
    ellauri276.html on line 1241: “What have been been doing boys all this long day? "Mitä pojat ovat tehneet koko tämän pitkän päivän?
    ellauri276.html on line 1245: But I turned round on him and made this reply, Mutta käännyin hänen puoleensa ja vastasin:
    ellauri276.html on line 1298: "Bostonin avioliitto" oli historiallisesti kahden varakkaan naisen avoliitto, joka oli riippumaton miehen taloudellisesta tuesta. Sanan sanotaan olleen käytössä Uudessa Englannissa 1800-luvun lopulla/1900-luvun alussa. Jotkut näistä suhteista olivat luonteeltaan niin romanttisia, että niitä voitaisiin nyt pitää lesbosuhteina; muut eivät olleet. Termi Bostonin avioliitto yhdistettiin Henry Jamesin The Bostonians (1886) -romaaniin, joka käsitteli pitkää avoliittoa kahden naimattoman naisen, "uusien naisten" välillä, vaikka James itse ei koskaan käyttänyt termiä. Jamesin sisar Alice eli sellaisessa suhteessa Katherine Loringin kanssa ja oli hänen romaanin lähteittensä joukossa. Bostonin avioliitot olivat niin yleisiä Wellesley Collegessa 1800-luvun lopulla ja 1900-luvun alussa, että termistä Wellesley-avioliitto tuli suosittu kuvaus. 1800-luvun lopulla Wellesleyn 53 naisen tiedekunnasta vain yksi nainen oli perinteisesti naimisissa miehen kanssa; useimmat muut asuivat naispuolisen seuralaisen kanssa. Yksi tunnetuimmista pareista oli Katharine Lee Bates ja Katharine Ellis Coman. Bates oli runouden professori ja " America The Beautiful " renkutuxen kirjoittaja.
    ellauri277.html on line 82: When you work you are a flute through whose heart the whispering of the hours turns to music.

    ellauri277.html on line 108: Niin, mixi se on vuoden lyhimpänä päivänä? Uskonprofessori English Campbellin yliopistosta osaa selittää: J. Kastajan isä Sakari oli leviitta joka sai enkeliltä käskyn panna turpa rullalle ja toimittaa Johannes alulle todnäk. Jom Kippurina. (? todnäk ei juuri silloin, koska katumuspäivä on paasto- ja pidätyspäivä juutalaisilla! No ehkä Sakari pisti töpinäxi heti seuraavana päivänä.). Siitä 6kk eteenpäin on Marian ilmestyspäivä kevätpäivän tasauxena, jolloin oli Marjan vuoro päästä Gabrielin pukille. Siitä kun laskee 9kk eteenpäin niin ollaan talvipäivän seisauxessa. Tosin pyhissä kirjoituxissa ei ole mitään mistä voi varmuudella päätellä että Sakari pääsi sovittamaan Liisaan siitintä juuri sovituspäivänä.
    ellauri277.html on line 186: Profeetan suosio kasvoi huomattavasti 1960-luvulla amerikkalaisen vastakulttuurin myötä ja sitten New Age -liikkeiden kukoistaessa. Se on pysynyt suosittuna näiden ja muun lällymmän väestön keskuudessa tähän päivään asti. Sen jälkeen, kun Profeetta julkaistiin ensimmäisen kerran vuonna 1923, sen painos ei ole koskaan loppunut. Se on käännetty yli 100 kielelle, joten se on historian kymmenen eniten käännetyn kirjan joukossa. Se oli yksi 1900-luvun myydyimmistä kirjoista Yhdysvalloissa, läähätti ihan Paulo Coelhon niskassa.
    ellauri277.html on line 217: Khalil senior seems to have been a violent drinker and a gambler; rather than tend to his walnuts he went to be a collector of taxes for the village headman, a job that was not considered reputable. In 1891 he was convicted of some fiscal irregularity, and his property was confiscated. Gibran later described his father to his women friends as a descendant of cavaliers, a romantic figure, who got into trouble with the law for refusing to compromise with corrupt village authorities. BUAHAHAHA.
    ellauri277.html on line 219: Similarly, Gibran later portrayed his life in Lebanon as idyllic, stressing his precocious artistic and literary talents and his mother’s efforts to educate him; some of these stories were obviously tall tales meant to impress his American patrons.
    ellauri277.html on line 221: Day was partial to exotic and orientalist themes and produced elegant homoerotic photographs of young men. Day became Gibran’s friend and patron, using the boy as a nude model, introducing him to smutty literature, and "helping him with his drawing". No one who reads Gibran’s works and knows Day’s tastes can doubt the depth of the latter’s influence on Gibran. Perhaps more important, Day and Day’s friends convinced Gibran that he had a special artistic calling.
    ellauri277.html on line 227: Shortly afterward, Gibran’s mother sent him back to Lebanon to continue his education; she may have been concerned about the influence of his new friends, and Gibran later said that he lost his virginity to an older married woman around this time. Peabody most likely, if not the downstairs neighbor.
    ellauri277.html on line 229: In November 1902 Gibran wrote to Peabody, and she invited him to a party held at her house two weeks later. An intense platonic relationship resulted, though Gibran seems to have wanted it to progress to a sexual one. He visited her regularly; they went to musical and artistic events together; they wrote to each other often; and she encouraged his writing and his art. She gave him the nickname that he later used as the title of his most famous book: “the Prophet.” In October 1903 Gibran wrote something in a letter to Peabody that angered her, and their relationship cooled.
    ellauri277.html on line 231: Gibran’s relationship with Peabody ended completely with her marriage in 1906. He then began a secret affair with a pianist, Gertrude Barrie, who, like Peabody, was several years his senior. During this period Haskell introduced him to an aspiring French actress, Émilie Michel, who taught French at Haskell’s school, and the two fell in love. In 1908 Michel suffered an ectopic pregnancy and had an abortion. The relationship waned and ultimately ended, a victim of Michel’s ambitions for a career on the stage.
    ellauri277.html on line 233: In April 1904 Day held an exhibit of Gibran’s work at his studio. It was favorably reviewed, and some of the pictures were sold. At the show Gibran met a woman who became his most important patron: Mary Haskell was from a wealthy South Carolina family and ran a private Boston girls’ school.
    ellauri277.html on line 236: Gibran did not have the training to imitate the old masters of Arabic literature: his education had been haphazard and was as much in English as in Arabic, and there is little evidence of the influence of classical Arabic literature in his works. Instead, his Arabic style was influenced by the Romantic writers of late 19th-century Europe and shows obvious traces of English syntax. His allegorical sketches of exile, oppression, and loneliness spoke to the experiences of immigrants and had none of the rhetorical decoration that made high Arabic literature difficult for ordinary readers. Gibran’s haphazard education meant that his Arabic, like his English, was never perfect.
    ellauri277.html on line 240: In the spring of 1913 he visited the International Exhibition of Modern Art—the “Armory Show”—which introduced European modern art to America. He approved of the show as a “declaration of independence” from tradition, but he did not think most of the paintings were beautiful and did not care for the artistic ideologies behind movements such as cubism. The reviews of an exhibition of his own work in December 1914 were mixed. Hedevoted most of his time to painting for the next eighteen years but remained loyal to the symbolism of his youth and became an isolated figure on the New York art scene.
    ellauri277.html on line 244: In 1923 the financially and emotionally exhausted Haskell moved to Savannah, Georgia, and became the companion of an elderly widower, Colonel Jacob Florence Minis. But her faith in Gibran’s literary and artistic importance never wavered, and she continued to edit his English manuscripts—discreetly, since Minis did not approve of Gibran.
    ellauri277.html on line 246: Gibran’s masterpiece, The Prophet, was published in September 1923. The earliest references to a mysterious prophet counseling his people before returning to his island home can be found in Haskell’s journal from 1912. Gibran worked on it from time to time and had finished much of it by 1919. He seems to have written it in Arabic and then translated it into English. As with most of his English books, Haskell acted as his editor, correcting Gibran’s chronically defective spelling and punctuation but also suggesting improvements in the wording.
    ellauri277.html on line 248: The work begins with the prophet Almustafa preparing to leave the city of Orphalese, where he has lived for twelve years, to return to the island of his birth. The people of the city gather and beg him not to leave, but the seeress Almitra, knowing that his ship has come for him, asks him instead to tell them his truths. The people ask him about the great themes of human life: love, marriage, children, giving, eating and drinking, and many others, concluding with death. Almustafa speaks of each of the themes in sober, sonorous aphorisms grouped into twenty-six short chapters. As in earlier books, Gibran illustrated The Prophet with his own drawings, adding to the power of the work.
    ellauri277.html on line 252: Gibran knew that he would never surpass The Prophet, and for the most part his later works do not come close to measuring up to it. The book made him a celebrity, and his monastic lifestyle added to his mystique.
    ellauri277.html on line 254: In 1925 the poet Barbara Young (pseudonym of Henrietta Breckenridge (!!!) Boughton) became Gibran’s secretary. She remained with Gibran for the rest of his life and played a major role in events after his death.
    ellauri277.html on line 256: In 1926 and 1927, respectively, Gibran published Sand and Foam in English (Donovan!). Sand and Foam is decorated with Gibran’s drawings, and the aphorisms are separated by floral dingbats also drawn by Gibran. Most critics did not like the book, but, like all of his English works (except the flop Twenty Drawings), it has remained in print since its publication.
    ellauri277.html on line 258: In 1928 Gibran published his longest book, Jesus, the Son of Man: His Words and His Deeds as Told and Recorded by Those Who Knew Him. It was the most lavishly produced of Gibran’s books, with some of the illustrations in color. For once, the reviews were strongly and uniformly favorable, and the book has remained the most popular of his works next to The Prophet.
    ellauri277.html on line 260: Gibran died on 10 April 1931 of cirrhosis of the liver. He was an alcoholic and had been in poor health since the early 1920s. Gibran’s death set off a series of sordid conflicts that have clouded his reputation. His will left money and real estate to his sister (Marianna Jubran never married and died in Boston in 1972). Breckenridge ja Haskell piippasivat äkäsesti toisilleen mustankipeinä Gibranin kirjallisesta jäämistöstä. Breckenridge´s 1945 biography of Gibran, an adulatory work full of misinformation—much of which may have come from Gibran himself—continues to create confusion even after the publication of several excellent biographies.
    ellauri277.html on line 264: Gibran has generally been dismissed as sentimental and mawkishly [imelän] mystical. Nevertheless, his works are widely read and are regarded as serious literature by people who do not often read such literature. The unconventional beauty of his language and the moral earnestness of his ideas allow him to speak to a broad audience as only a handful of other twentieth-century American poets have. The sad fact is that a large majority of these monkeys are sentimental and mawkishly mystical.
    ellauri277.html on line 277: role and significance of religious values in the public consciousness and self-consciousness, which became the object of research of philosophers, historians, political scientists, specialists of state administration. At the same time, actual issues of religious values in ensuring the spiritual security of society remain insufficiently studied. There is no detailed scientific substantiation and comprehensive study of spiritual security in the structure of national security.
    ellauri277.html on line 283: state regulation in the system of ensuring the spiritual security of society. The essence of the spiritual security of society, mechanisms of state regulation in the system of ensuring the spiritual security of society is specified. The international experience of the system of spiritual values is generalized and systematized and the possibility of its introduction in Ukraine is determined. The features of state regulation in the system of spiritual security of Ukrainian society in modern conditions are determined. The mechanisms of state regulation in the system of ensuring the spiritual security of Ukrainian society are assessed. The main approaches to optimizing the mechanisms of state regulation in this area are proposed.
    ellauri277.html on line 291: ХVІІ — ХVІІІ ctorichia [From the history of native natsional´nou bezpekou v Ukraini [State Administration
    ellauri277.html on line 348: Effendin johdolla herätysliike muuttui järjestäytyneeksi uskonnoksi 1930-luvulta lähtien. Hänen toimikautenaan valmistuivat muun muassa Babin hautapyhäkkö ja Kansainvälinen arkistorakennus. Vuonna 1944 Effendi kirjoitti bahai-historian sata ensimmäistä vuotta käsittävän teoksen, God Passes By. God was here but he left early. Hänen toimiensa ansiosta bahai-usko saavutti vuonna 1948 ei-valtiollisiin järjestöihin kuuluvan aseman Yhdistyneissä kansakunnissa. Effendi kuoli vuonna 1957, minkä jälkeen johtajuus on ollut pikemminkin ryhmällä kuin yksittäisellä henkilöllä. Vuonna 1963 valittiin ensimmäinen Yleismaailmallinen oikeusneuvosto johtamaan uskontokuntaa Israelin Haifasta käsin.
    ellauri277.html on line 356: Jumala on Bahai-uskossa ylimaallinen, eikä häntä voi tuntea suoratoistona, enintään kesäuusintoina. Jumala on ilmaissut itseään eri sanansaattajien kautta, joista viimeisin oli Baha’ullah. Bahai-uskon mukaan Jumala on yksi ja koko kaikkeus kuuluu hänelle, muut älkööt yrittäkökään. Hän on kaikkivaltias ja täydellinen. Hänen ei tarvi pyrkiä enää mihinkään. Maailmanhistoriassa on ollut vain yksi Jumala ja eri uskonnot ovat kutsuneet Häntä eri nimillä. Ihmisen rajallinen mieli ei voi ymmärtää Jumalaa. Bahaiden mukaan ainoa asia, mitä tiedämme Jumalasta on, että hän on olemassa. Kaikki muut arvauxet on ilman muuta vääriä.
    ellauri277.html on line 462: Jokeri on herättänyt henkiin Friedrich Nietzschen unen ja Pyhän Paavalin painajaisen. Nietzsche, tuo pahamaineinen 1800-luvun saksalainen kristinuskon haastaja, julisti, että hyvän ja pahan, jalon ja arvottoman, oikean ja väärän moraalijärjestelmät eivät ole muuta kuin ihmisten rakenteita, sosiaalisia mukavuuksia ja typeriä tapoja. Eettiset säännöt eivät ole todellisempia, ehdottomia tai ikuisempia kuin etiketin säännöt. Ne ovat ihmisen aiheuttamia ja mielivaltaisia, ja näistä syistä ne tulisi lähettää liekkeihin. Mitä hemmettiä? Outo argumentti, mikä vikaa siinä on että ne on (luonnon)historiallisia ilmiöitä, kun lyhytkestoisista apinoista kumminkin on kymysys? Kummallista ikuisuuden ihannointia. P. Paavali oli kyllä aika painajaismainen kaveri. Mixi sen vuonna kivi ja puu Moosexen lakiin tekemät sääntömuutoxet olisivat yhtään edellistä enemmän kiveen hakattuja?
    ellauri277.html on line 485: Sofia on kyllä vitun vaarallinen ja pahansuopakin. S.Nurmi vetää huumeita ja wiixeen huumeämmiä. Mixi suomalaisista poliiseista on tullut pahoja? Jari Aarnio kai näytti esimerkkiä. Reinikainen venelakkeineen oli paljon kivempi. No nyt on vedetty läpi kuitenkin koko S.KARPPI sarja, pimeitä kellareita on saatu kurkun täydeltä, ja huonosti motivoituja symbolisia paloittelumurhia plus muita vainaita. Tutustuttu varmaan kaikkiin stadin hylätyihin teollisuusmestoihin, nähty vastenmielisiä "POLIISI" siiroja valtavilla automaattiaseilla tunkeutumassa pahaa-aavistamattomien pahisten kotehin. Kenen mielestä tää voi olla jotain viihdettä? Kai laahuxen jonka oma elämä on totaalisen pimeetä, koska se on syvältä perseestä.
    ellauri278.html on line 44: Taimen, huudahti Stalin innoissaan. Hei-hei, huopaa siiman suuntaan. Älä anna sen mennä veneen alle. Oh perse, käännä, käännä enemmän. Vasempaan, vasempaan senkin menshevikki! Mutta rähinöinnin päätteexi 3-kiloinen taimen nousi haavissa veneeseen. Stalin oli yhtä hymyä.
    - Jeesuxen äiti ärjäisi Stalin kiihkoissaan. Onpa mahtava kuha! Hän sai haavin kalan pyrstön taaxe ja sitä tietä veneen pohja rytkähti, kun 9-kiloinen kuha rummutti pyrstöllään pohjalautoja. Molotovia vähän hirvitti, mutta Stalin kohotti perämelan ja antoi kuhan niskaan nasakan iskun. Jättikala potki rajusti, värisi, pörhisti selkäevänsä ja oxensi kuollessaan puolenkymmentä kuoretta. - Sehän on lihava kuin Göring, ähkäisi Molotov.
    ellauri278.html on line 79: Šapošnikov oli yksi harvoista miehistä , joita Stalin puhutteli hänen kristinimellään ja sukunimellään. Mozg Armii on pysynyt Yleisesikuntaakatemian opetussuunnitelmassa sen julkaisemisesta vuonna 1929. Neuvostoliiton onneksi Shaposhnikovilla oli hieno sotilaallinen mieli ja korkeat hallinnolliset taidot. Hän yhdisti nämä kyvyt asemaansa Stalinin luottamuksessa rakentaakseen uudelleen puna-armeijan johtokaareja puhdistusten jälkeen. Hän sai Gulagilta vapautuksen 4 000 upseerista, jotka katsottiin tarpeellisiksi tätä operaatiota varten. Vuonna 1939 Stalin hyväksyi Šapošnikovin suunnitelman Puna-armeijan voiman nopeasta kasvattamisesta. Vaikka suunnitellut muutokset jäivät kesken akselin hyökkäyksen aikana kesäkuussa 1941, ne olivat edenneet riittävästi pelastaakseen Neuvostoliiton täydelliseltä katastrofilta.
    ellauri278.html on line 97: oikeastaan ollut laulua eikä soittoa, ei myöskään rallatusta. Aäni syntyi tanssijain röhistessä kurkkuaan, mikäli voin huomata etupäässä takapiässä sisään henkiessä. Olin välillä erottavinani joitakuita tajuttavia äänteitä, sentapaisia kuin: höö-him, hööhei, hoo-him, haaveli. Sitten taas luulin kuulevani: hinkin.
    ellauri278.html on line 98: hoo-hei, hinkin, höö-hei». Ezellasta. Riehuessaan Sozhissa kännipäissä Soselo (Pikku-Joose) saattoi mukeltaa yöhuutona: Houii möyy, höyäh, möö, mässähyhouii. Huutelun kuulleet sanoivat, että älämölöä ei ollut helppo litteroida.
    ellauri278.html on line 104: Jakovlev kieltää jyrkästi olettamuxet että Jopi köyri alkuperäiskansan keittäjää. Sensijaan hän omalla tavallaan rakasti lamuutin välittömyyttä ja luonnon lapsen raikkautta. Tästä ovat tiettävästi kertoneet useissakin yhteyksissä A. I. Mikojan ja O.V. Kuusinen. Tytön asuessa ensimmäisiä viikkojaan Stalinin datšassa Stalin hämmästeli hihkaisuja ja eräänlaisia riemunkiljaisuja, joita tyttö päästeli asioidessaan WC:ssä. Kun tämä toistui taas muutamana aamuna Stalinin ollessa teepöydässä. Stalin kysyi mitä tyttö oikein kiljui vessassa. Tyttö sanoi hänestä olevan hassua ja hauskaa, kun kakka lähtee viimeiselle matkalleen kosken kohistessa.
    ellauri278.html on line 108: Maa nousi mudasta. Se asetettiin lujalle jaloille. Kävi sodan läpi ja selvisi voittajana. Olen yllättynyt happamuudesta, jolla nykynuoret nyt kiroavat Stalinia. Loppujen lopuksi monet ovat syntyneet 91 vuoden jälkeen (oisko kolmannes). Tietämättä koko Stalinin historiaa he kastelevat sekä Stalinia itseään että sitä SUURTA maata virzalla ja loukkauksilla. Kyllä minä mieleni pahoitin.
    ellauri278.html on line 157: Vyshinsky first became a nationally known public figure as a result of the Semenchuk case of 1936. Konstantin Semenchuk was the head of the Glavsevmorput station on Wrangel Island. He was accused of oppressing and starving the local Yupik and of ordering his subordinate, the sledge driver Stepan Startsev, to murder Dr. Nikolai Vulfson, who had attempted to stand up to Semenchuk, on 27 December 1934 (though there were also rumors that Startsev had fallen in love with Vulfson's wife, Dr. Gita Feldman, and killed him out of jealousy). The case came to trial before the Supreme Court of the RSFSR in May 1936; both defendants, attacked by Vyshinsky as "human waste", were found guilty and shot, and "the most publicised result of the trial was the joy of the liberated Eskimos."
    ellauri278.html on line 159: In 1936, Vyshinsky achieved international fame as the prosecutor at the Zinoviev-Kamenev trial (this trial had nine other defendants), the first of the Moscow Trials during the Great Purge, lashing its defenseless victims with memorable rhetoric:
    ellauri278.html on line 161: Shoot these rabid dogs. Death to this gang who hide their ferocious teeth, their eagle claws, from the people! Down with that vulture Trotsky, from whose mouth a bloody venom drips, putrefying the great ideals of Marxism! ... Down with these abject animals! Let's put an end once and for all to these miserable hybrids of foxes and pigs, these stinking corpses! Let's exterminate the mad dogs of capitalism, who want to tear to pieces the flower of our new Soviet nation! Let's push the bestial hatred they bear our leaders back down their own throats!
    ellauri278.html on line 163: He often punctuated speeches with phrases like "Dogs of the Fascist bourgeoisie", "mad dogs of Trotskyism", "dregs of society", "decayed people", "terrorist thugs and degenerates", and "accursed vermin". This dehumanization aided in what historian Arkady Vaksberg calls "a hitherto unknown type of trial where there was not the slightest need for evidence: what evidence did you need when you were dealing with 'stinking carrion' and 'mad dogs'."
    ellauri278.html on line 167: He spoke good French, was quick, clever and efficient, and always knew his dossier well, but whereas I had a certain unwilling respect for Molotov, I had none at all for Vyshinsky. All Soviet officials at that time had no choice but to carry out Stalin's policies without asking too many questions, but Vyshinsky above all gave me the impression of a cringing toadie only too anxious to obey His Master's Voice even before it had expressed his wishes. ... I always had the feeling with Vyshinsky that his past as a Menshevik together with his Polish and bourgeois background made him particularly servile and obsequious in his dealings with Stalin and to a lesser extent with Molotov.
    ellauri278.html on line 169: Lenin taught us that "there has never been a single deep and mighty popular movement in history without filthy scum." Comrade Stalin warned us that
    ellauri278.html on line 171: We must bear in mind that the growth of the power of the Soviet state will increase the resistance of the last remnants of the dying classes. It is precisely because they are dying, and living their last days that they will pass from one form of attack to another, to sharper forms of attack, appealing to the backward strata of the population, and mobilizing them against the Soviet power. There is no foul lie or slander that these 'have-beens' would not use against the Soviet power and around which they would not try to mobilize the backward elements. This may give ground for the revival of the activities of the defeated groups of the old counter-revolutionary parties: the Socialist-Revolutionaries, the Mensheviks (glup), the bourgeois Malo-Russian nationalists (double glup) in the centre and in the outlying regions; it may give grounds also for the revival of the activities of the fragments of counter-revolutionary opposition elements from among the Trotskyites and the Right deviationists. Of course, there is nothing terrible in this. But we must bear all this in mind if we want to put an end to these elements quickly and without great loss."
    ellauri278.html on line 182: Siberian pensioner IS grandson of Josef Stalin, DNA test reveals. Yury Davydov, 67, gets proof of his roots after years of waiting: his grandmother was Stalin's 14 year old lover. Stalin a Pedo? what has the world come to?
    ellauri278.html on line 192: A distant relative of Aleksandr Pushkin, Georgy Chicherin was born into an old noble family. He was born on the estate of his uncle, Boris Chicherin, in Karaul, Tambov. His father, Vasily N. Chicherin, was a diplomat employed by the Foreign Office of the Russian Empire.
    ellauri278.html on line 194: In 1904, Chicherin inherited the estate of his famous uncle in Tambov Governorate and became very wealthy. He immediately used his new fortune to support revolutionary activities in the runup to the Russian Revolution of 1905 and was forced to flee abroad to avoid arrest late in that year. He spent the next 13 years in London, Paris and Berlin, where he joined the Menshevik faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party and was active in emigre politics. In Imperial Germany, he underwent medical treatment in attempts to cure his homosexuality.
    ellauri278.html on line 196: Chicherin followed a pro-German foreign policy in line with his anti-British attitudes, which he had developed during his time in the Foreign Ministry, when Britain was blocking Russian expansion in Asia. Chicherin is thought to have had more phone conversations with Lenin than anyone else. When Joseph Stalin replaced Lenin in 1924, Chicherin remained foreign minister, and Stalin valued his opinions.
    ellauri278.html on line 200: Chicherin was an eccentric, with obsessive work habits. Alexander Barmine, who worked in the People´s Commissariat for Foreign Affairs, noted that "Chicherin was a workaholic with peculiar habits. His workroom was completely buried in books, newspaper and documents. He used to patter into our room in his shirt sleeves, wearing a large silk handkerchief round his neck and slippers adorned with metal buckles ... which, for comfort´s sake, he never troubled to fasten, making a clicking noise on the floor." In 1930 Chicherin was formally replaced by his deputy, Maxim Litvinov. A continuing terminal illness burdened his last years, which forced him away from his circle of friends and active work and led to an early death.
    ellauri278.html on line 208: In January 1908, French police arrested Litvinov under the name Meer Wallach while carrying twelve 500-ruble banknotes that had been stolen in a bank robbery in Tiflis the year before. The Russian government demanded his extradition but the French Minister for Justice Aristide Briand ruled Litvinov´s crime was political and ordered him to be deported. He went to Belfast, Ireland, where he joined his sister Rifka and her family. There, he taught foreign languages in the Jewish Jaffe Public Elementary School until 1910.
    ellauri278.html on line 214: In February 1921, the Soviet government was approached by the government of the unilaterally declared Irish Republic in Dublin with proposals for a treaty of mutual recognition and assistance. Despairing of early American recognition for the Irish Republic, President of the Dáil Éireann Éamon De Valera had redirected his envoy Patrick McCartan from Washington to Moscow. McCartan may have assumed Litvinov, with his Irish experience, would be a ready ally. Litvinov, however, told McCarten the Soviet priority was a trade agreement with the UK.
    ellauri278.html on line 216: On 6 February 1933, Litvinov made the most-significant speech of his career, in which he tried to define aggression. He stated the internal situation of a country, alleged maladministration, possible danger to foreign residents, and civil unrest in a neighbouring country were not justifications for war. This speech became the authority when war was justified. British politician Anthony Eden had said; "to try to define aggression was a trap for the innocent and protection for the guilty". In 1946, the British Government supported Litvinov’s definition of aggression by accusing the Soviet Union of not complying with Litvinov’s definition of aggression. Finland made similar criticisms against the Soviet Union in 1939.
    ellauri278.html on line 224: In 1933, Litvinov was instrumental in winning a long-sought formal diplomatic recognition of the Soviet government by the United States. US President Franklin Roosevelt sent comedian Harpo Marx to the Soviet Union as a goodwill ambassador. Isosetä Karl oli näät disponibiliteetissa. Litvinov and Marx became friends and performed a routine on stage together. Litvinov also facilitated the acceptance of the Soviet Union into the League of Nations, where he represented his country from 1934 to 1938. Litvinov has been considered to have concentrated on taking strong measures against Italy, Japan and Germany, and being little interested in other matters.
    ellauri278.html on line 226: After the 1938 Munich Agreement, German state media derided Maxim Litvinov for his Jewish ancestry, referring to him as "Finkelstein-Litvinov". The Munich Agreement (Czech: Mnichovská dohoda; Slovak: Mníchovská dohoda; German: Münchner Abkommen) was an agreement concluded at Munich on 30 September 1938, by Nazi Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy. The agreement provided for the German annexation of land on the border between Czechoslovakia and Germany called the Sudetenland, where more than three million people, mainly ethnic Germans, lived. The pact is also known in "some areas" as the Munich Betrayal (Czech: Mnichovská zrada; Slovak: Mníchovská zrada), because of a previous 1924 alliance agreement and a 1925 military pact between France and the Czechoslovak Republic.
    ellauri278.html on line 229: On 30 September, Czechoslovakia yielded to the combination of military pressure by Germany, Poland, and Hungary, and diplomatic pressure by the United Kingdom and France, and agreed to give up territory to Germany on Munich terms. Then, on 1 October, Czechoslovakia also accepted Polish territorial demands. Much of Europe celebrated the Munich Agreement, as they considered it a way to prevent a major war on the continent. Adolf Hitler announced that it was his last territorial claim in Northern Europe. Today, the Munich Agreement is widely regarded as a failed act of appeasement, and the term has become a byword for the futility of appeasing expansionist totalitarian states.
    ellauri278.html on line 231: On 3 May 1939, Stalin replaced Litvinov, who was closely identified with the anti-German position, with Vyacheslav Molotov. At a prearranged meeting, Stalin said: "The Soviet Government intended to improve its relations with Hitler and if possible sign a pact with Nazi Germany. As a Jew and an avowed opponent of such a policy, Litvinov stood in the way." Litvinov argued and banged on the table. Stalin then demanded Litvinov to sign a letter of resignation. On the night of Litvinov´s dismissal, NKVD troops surrounded the offices of the Commissariat of Foreign Affairs. The telephone at Litvinov´s dacha was disconnected and the following morning, Molotov, Georgy Malenkov, and Lavrenty Beria arrived at the commissariat to inform Litvinov of his dismissal. Many of Litvinov´s aides were arrested and beaten, possibly to extract compromising information.
    ellauri278.html on line 240: The imperialists in these two countries had done everything they could to goad Hitler’s Germany against the Soviet Union by secret deals and provocative moves. In the circumstances the Soviet Union could either accept German proposals for a non-aggression treaty and thus secure a period of peace in which to redouble preparations to repulse the aggressor; or turn down Germany’s proposals and let the warmongers in the Western camp push the Soviet Union into an armed conflict with Germany in unfavourable circumstances and in a setting of complete isolation. In this situation the Soviet Government was compelled to make the difficult choice and conclude a non-aggression treaty with Germany. I, too, would probably have concluded a pact with Germany although a bit differently.
    ellauri278.html on line 244: Given Litvinov´s prior attempts to create an anti-fascist coalition, association with the doctrine of collective security with France and Britain, and pro-Western orientation by Kremlin standards, his dismissal indicated the existence of a Soviet option of rapprochement with Germany. Molotov´s appointment was a signal to Germany the USSR would negotiate. The dismissal also signaled to France and Britain the existence of a potential negotiation option with Germany. One British official wrote Litvinov´s disappearance meant the loss of an admirable technician or shock-absorber, while Molotov´s modus operandi was "more truly Bolshevik than diplomatic or cosmopolitan".
    ellauri278.html on line 248: In the 21-month period between the declaration of war by France and Britain, and the invasion of the Soviet Union by Germany, Ivy Litvinov describes this period of her life. She said the family spent their time with their daughter-in-law in their dacha 27 kilometres (17 mi) from Moscow and outside school holidays in the family apartment in Moscow, when they spent long weekends in the country. For two years, the family played bridge, read music, and went on long walks in the countryside with their two dogs.
    ellauri278.html on line 252: Even to Litvinov, the German invasion of the Soviet Union was a surprise; he did not believe Hitler would risk embarking on a second front at this stage of the war. Churchill informed the world Hitler´s actions were not a surprise to him, and that a victory over the USSR by Hitler would be a catastrophe for the British Empire.
    ellauri278.html on line 254: Early in November 1941, Litvinov was summoned to see Stalin and told his services were required as ambassador to the United States. In the US, the appointment was met with enthusiasm. The New York Times stated: "Stalin has decided to place his ablest and most forceful diplomat and one who enjoys greater prestige in this country. He is known as a man of exceptional ability, adroit as well as forceful. It is believed that Stalin, in designating him for the ambassadorship, felt Litvinov could exercise real influence in Washington."
    ellauri278.html on line 260: After returning to Soviet Union, Litvinov became deputy minister for foreign affairs. He was dismissed from his post after an interview given to Richard C. Hottelet on 18 June 1946 in which he said a war between the West and the Soviet Union was inevitable.
    ellauri278.html on line 262: Maxim Litvinov died on on 31 December 1951. After his death, rumours he was murdered on Stalin´s instructions to the Ministry of Internal Affairs circulated. According to Anastas Mikoyan, alorry deliberately collided with Litvinov´s car as it rounded a bend near the Litvinov dacha on 31 December 1951, and he later died of his injuries. British television journalist Tim Tzouliadis stated; "The assassination of Litvinov marked an intensification of Stalin´s anti-Semitic campaign". According to Litvinov´s wife and daughter, however, Stalin was still on good terms with Litvinov at the time of his death. They said he had serious heart problems and was given the best treatment available during the final weeks of his life, and that he died from a heart attack on 31 December 1951. After Litvinov´s death, his widow Ivy remained in the Soviet Union until she returned to live in Britain in 1972.
    ellauri278.html on line 264: In his reminiscences dictated to a supporter later in life, Vyacheslav Molotov—Litvinov´s replacement as chief of foreign affairs and right-hand man of Joseph Stalin—said Litvinov was "intelligent" and "first rate" but said he and Stalin "didn´t trust him" and consequently "left him out of negotiations" with the United States during the war. Molotov called Litvinov "not a bad diplomat—a good one" but also called him quite an opportunist who greatly sympathized with Leon Trotsky, Grigory Zinoviev, and Lev Kamenev. According to Molotov; Litvinov remained among the living in the Great Purge only by chance.
    ellauri278.html on line 271:

    Molotov, Stalin ja Voroshilov 1937 suunnittelevat remuiltaa Sotshissa.

    ellauri278.html on line 296: Ala-Lausitzin merkittävimpiä kaupunkeja ovat Cottbus, Eisenhüttenstadt, Guben, Forst, Luckau, Finsterwalde, Senftenberg, Spremberg, Bad Muskau, Puolan puolella sijaitseva Żary, Vetschau, Lübben ja Lübbenau sekä länsilaidalla Herzberg. Ylä-Lausitzin merkittävimpiä kaupunkeja ovat Bautzen, Görlitz, Lubań, Zittau, Löbau ja Kamenz sekä Niesky, Hoyerswerda ja Weißwasser. Cottbus on koko Lausitzin alueen väestöllisesti suurin kaupunki. Bautzen on historiallisesti Ylä-Lausitzin pääkaupunki ja Luckau Ala-Lausitzin.
    ellauri278.html on line 326: Limp Bizkit is an American rap rock band from Jacksonville, Florida. Its lineup consists of lead vocalist Fred Durst, drummer John Otto, guitarist Wes Borland, turntablist DJ Lethal and bassist Sam Rivers. The band's music is marked by Durst's angry vocal delivery and Borland's sonic experimentation. Borland's elaborate visual appearance, which includes face and body paint, masks, and uniforms, also plays a large role in Limp Bizkit´s live shows. The band has been nominated for three Grammy Awards, sold 40 million records worldwide, and won several other awards. The band has released 26 singles, the most notable of which include "Nookie", "Re-Arranged", "Break Stuff", "Take a Look Around", "Rollin' (Air Raid Vehicle)." Formed in 1994, Limp Bizkit became popular playing in the Jacksonville underground music scene in the late 1990s. n October 28, 2021, Durst confirmed via Instagram that the band's sixth album – now titled Still Sucks – would be released on October 31, 2021. Durst's lyrics are often profane, scatological or angry. Much of Durst´s lyrical inspiration came from growing up and his personal life. I did it all for the nookie [slang for sexual intercourse].
    ellauri278.html on line 337: Neuvostopropaganda käytti jonkun typerän "luokkasodan" retoriikkaa vetoaen vallankumouksen ja sisällissodan parhaisiin perinteisiin. Komentaja Tymoshenkon vetoomus puolalaisille sotilaille kehotti heitä tappamaan upseerinsa: "Lupseerit ajavat teidät järjettömään teurastukseen. He vihaavat sinua ja perhettäsi. Älä luota upseereihisi. Upseerit ja kenraalit ovat vihollisesi, he haluavat sinun kuolevan! Sotilaat - lyö upseerit ja kenraalit! Älä tottele upseerisi käskyjä. Aja heidät pois maastasi." Ihan hyviä ohjeita, oli maa mikä tahansa. Kun älymystöpolakit eivät älynneet tehdä sitä ize, neuvostolaiset hoiti homman jezulleen.
    ellauri278.html on line 364:
    Prof. Orshosh ruumiinavauksessa. Lähistöllä ovat prof. Markov (Bulgaria) ja prof. Arno Saxen (Suomi, verikauhassa). Professori F. Orshoshin käyttämä kallon tilan mukainen ajoitusmenetelmä ei löytänyt riittävää myöhempää vahvistusta lääketieteellisessä käytännössä, mistä prof. Saxen kyllä huomautti.

    ellauri278.html on line 386: Koko sen ajan, kun neuvostoliittolaiset ja puolalaiset historioitsijat etsivät asiakirjoja Katynista, Katyniin liittyviä tärkeimpiä politbyroon asiakirjoja säilytettiin NKP:n keskuskomitean arkiston (jäljempänä Presidentinarkisto) salaisessa erityiskansiossa; MS Gorbatšov tiesi heidän olemassaolostaan. B. N. Jeltsin sai Erikoiskansion asiakirjat henkilökohtaisesti Gorbatšovilta, kun tämä oli siirtänyt vallan. Kahdeksan kuukautta myöhemmin, 24. syyskuuta 1992, paketti nro 1, joka sisälsi Katyniin liittyviä asiakirjoja, avattiin.
    ellauri278.html on line 395: Vuonna 2011 Venäjän viranomaiset ilmoittivat olevansa valmiita harkitsemaan kysymystä teloituksen uhrien kuntouttamisesta. 2000-luvulla ja varsinkin 2010-luvulla neuvostoversiota puoltavat äänet kuuluivat jälleen Venäjän historiallisessa yhteisössä. Kielteiset kriitikot huomauttavat, että he eivät julkaisuissaan pysähdy suoranaisiin valheisiin vaan turvautuvat pitkään kiistettyjen lausuntojen toistamiseen, luottaen lukijoiden tietämättömyyteen.
    ellauri278.html on line 399: Katynin verilöylyn aihe esiintyy säännöllisesti Puolan ja Venäjän lehdistössä. Lech Kaczynski totesi, että sillä on edelleen tärkeä paikka puolalaisten kansallisessa historiallisessa muistissa, kun taas valtaosa venäläisistä kyselyn mukaan pitää sitä merkityksettömänä.
    ellauri278.html on line 401: 24. kesäkuuta 2022 ilmestyi tieto, että Puolan lippu poistettiin Katynin muistomerkkikompleksista. Katynin hallinto vahvisti, että 24. kesäkuuta "Puolan lipun puuttuminen havaittiin", mutta ohjasi muut toimittajien kysymykset Venäjän nykyhistorian museoon, jolle muistomerkki kuuluu. Smolenskin pormestari Andrei Borisov sanoi, että päätöksen teki kulttuuriministeriö. Ukrainan lippuakaan ei ole näkynyt.
    ellauri278.html on line 442: his-gun.jpg/270px-Thompson-and-his-gun.jpg" />
    ellauri278.html on line 537: Saksan armeijan valmistautuminen sotaan alkoi elokuussa 1940 salanimellä Friz, ja sitä koordinoi kenraali Friedrich Pauluksen johtama ryhmä syyskuusta alkaen. Hitlerin uuden päämajan Wolfschanzen rakentaminen aloitettiin Itä-Preussiin Rastenburgin kaupungin lähelle. Lopullinen päiväkäsky nro. 21 nimellä operaatio Barbarossa allekirjoitettiin 18. joulukuuta. Sodasta piti tulla lyhyt. Joseph Goebbels kirjoitti päiväkirjaansa keskustelusta Hitlerin kanssa: ”Vihollinen ajetaan taaksepäin yhdellä tasaisella liikkeellä. Führer arvioi operaatioon kuluvan neljä kuukautta. Minä luulen, että vähemmän. Bolševismi luhistuu kuin korttitalo.”
    ellauri278.html on line 554: - Minua alkaa tympäistä koko Hitler, karjaisee Stalin isolla äänellä. Siitä miehestä olen kohta saanut tarpeekseni. Aina se on puhumassa ja raakkumassa joka paikassa. Aina se tyrkyttää toisille omia oppejaan. Minun nähdäkseni vain kommunismia saa levittää, ei muita oppeja. Ei se sitäpaizi ole mikään oppi, se on historiallinen välttämättömyys.
    ellauri278.html on line 572: Sillä kyllä jumalaton aina jumalisen voittaa, naurahtaa Stalim. Tulevina vuosikymmeninä ateistit vievät voiton jeesusmiehistä. Jeesusmies rukoilee ja hymisee, mutta ateisti toimii ja luottaa omaan voimaansa. Näin arvelee Stalin ja nykäisee ylleen univormun takin. Hän ottaa suuresta peltipurkista mahorkkaa tupakkakukkaroonsa ja leikkaa nahistuneesta kurkusta pari ohutta viipaletta
    ellauri278.html on line 577: Ettei vaan lännen optimismi Putinismin pikaisesta luhistumisesta kuin korttitalo olisi yhtä huonosti ennakoitua...
    ellauri279.html on line 47: Šostakovitsin Mstsenskin piirikunnan Lady Macbeth oli minulle pettymys. Se oli sekasotkua musiikin asemesta. Minua tympäisi tökerö ja jäsentymätön soitinnus. Olin tyrmistynyt kun vähäiset melodian yritykset ja sävelmän aloitelmat hukkuivat joutavaan ryskämiseen, kirskuntaan ja kiljuntaan. Näyttämöllä kannetaan jotain jättimäisiä muovilohia joilla ei ole juonen kanssa mitään tekemistä. Järjetöntä! Siitä ei ole pitkä matka amerikkalaiseen rappiomusiikkiin kuten Limp Bizkit. Kauhistuneena olen kuunnellut muutakin uudempaa amerikkalaista musiikkia. Millaista iukuttamista, paukuttelua ja ränkymistä! Kapitalismi syö itseään sisältäpäin kaikin tavoin, niin, kaikin tavoin. Sen luhistuminen on lähellä.
    ellauri279.html on line 52: Aleksandr Isajevitš Solženitsyn (ven. Алекса́ндр Иса́евич Солжени́цын; 11. joulukuuta 1918 Kislovodsk – 3. elokuuta 2008 Moskova) oli Sirkan ikäinen punakapinan aikana syntynyt neuvostoliittolainen "matemaatikko", kirjailija ja harrastelijahistorioitsija.
    ellauri279.html on line 64: matemaatikko, kirjailija, historioitsija
    ellauri279.html on line 81: Aleksandr Isajevitš Solženitsyn (ven. Алекса́ндр Иса́евич Солжени́цын; 11. joulukuuta 1918 Kislovodsk – 3. elokuuta 2008 Moskova) oli venäläinen kirjailija ja historioitsija. Erityisesti hänet tunnetaan Neuvostoliiton ojennustyöleirijärjestelmästä kertovista teoksistaan, joihin kuuluvat muiden muassa Ivan Denisovitšin päivä (1962), Syöpäosasto (1968), Ensimmäinen piiri ja Vankileirien saaristo (1973–1976).
    ellauri279.html on line 95: Erään William Harrisonin mukaan Solzhenitsyn oli varsinkin loppupeleissä "arkki-taantumuksellinen", joka väitti, että Neuvostoliiton valtio "tukahdutti" perinteisen iso- ja vähävenäläisen kulttuurin, vaati yhtenäisen slaavilaisen valtion luomista, joka kattaa Venäjän, Ukrainan ja Valko-Venäjän, ja joka oli Ukrainan itsenäisyyden kova vastustaja. On hyvin dokumentoitu, että hänen kielteiset näkemyksensä Ukrainan itsenäisyydestä muuttuivat radikaalimmiksi vuosien varrella. Harrison väitti myös, että Solzhenitsynillä oli panslaavilaisia ja monarkistisia näkemyksiä. Harrisonin mukaan "Hänen historiallinen kirjoituksensa on täynnä himoa idealisoidun tsaarin aikakauden jälkeen, jolloin näennäisesti kaikki oli ruusuista. Hän etsi turvapaikkaa unenomaisesta menneisyydestä, jossa hän uskoi, että ortodoksiselle perustalle rakennettu yhtenäinen slaavilainen valtio (Venäjän valtakunta) oli tarjonnut ideologisen vaihtoehdon länsimaiselle individualistiselle liberalismille.
    ellauri279.html on line 105: Vuonna 2008 Solzhenitsyn ylisti Putinia sanoen, että Venäjä löytää uudelleen, mitä se tarkoitti olla venäläinen. Solzhenitsyn kehui myös Venäjän presidenttiä Dmitri Medvedeviä "mukavaksi nuoreksi mieheksi". Pitämällä aloituspuheen Harvardin yliopistossa vuonna 1978 hän kutsui Yhdysvaltoja "dekristillistetyksi" ja juuttui hurjaan kulutukseen. Amerikkalaiset, hän sanoi, puhuessaan venäjäksi (aika huonon) kääntäjän kautta, kärsivät myös "rohkeuden heikkenemisestä" ja "miehisyyden puutteesta". Harvat olivat valmiita kuolemaan tai järsimään sillinpäitä ihanteidensa puolesta, hän sanoi. Hän tuomitsi myös 1960 -luvun vastakulttuurin siitä, että se pakotti Yhdysvaltain liittohallituksen hyväksymään "hätäisen" antautumisen Vietnamin sodassa. Hän syytti myös länsimaista uutismediaa vasemmistolaisesta puolueellisuudesta, julkkisten yksityisyyden loukkaamisesta ja lukijoidensa "kuolemattomien sielujen" täyttämisestä julkkisjuoruilla ja muulla "turhalla puheella".
    ellauri279.html on line 113: Solzhenitsyn väitti lisäksi, että teorian, jonka mukaan holodomor oli kansanmurha, joka muuten vain uhrasi Ukrainan kansan, loivat vuosikymmeniä myöhemmin venäläisvastaiseen äärimmäisen ukrainalaisen nationalismin muotoon uskovat. Solzhenitsyn varoitti myös, että ultranationalistien väitteet olivat vaarassa tulla kiistatta hyväksytyiksi lännessä, koska siellä on laajalle levinnyt pahansuopuus, tietämättömyys ja väärinkäsitys sekä Venäjän että Ukrainan historiasta.
    ellauri279.html on line 118: Pavlik repukkaa retuutetaan molemmanmerkkisten propagandapellejen hampaissa kuin takavuosien sidoste-sukkaa. "Kokeneet kirjoittajat eivät ole vielä tarkistaneet sivun nykyistä versiota, ja se voi poiketa merkittävästi 17. lokakuuta 2022 tarkistetusta versiosta . vahvistus vaatii 21 muokkausta." sanoo Wikipedia. Muutenkin suht epäluotettavaxi havaittu historioizija Weikko Huovinen esittää Morozovin tapauxen täysin päin persettä, tietysti oikeistonäkökulmasta.
    ellauri279.html on line 144: Koulu, josta vastasin, työskenteli kahdessa vuorossa. Tuolloin meillä ei ollut aavistustakaan radiosta, sähköstä, istuimme iltaisin taskulamppujen ääressä, huolehdimme kerosiinista. Mustetta ei myöskään ollut, he kirjoittivat juurikasmehulla. Köyhyys ylipäänsä oli kauhistuttavaa. Kun me, opettajat, aloimme käydä talosta taloon ottamassa lapsia kouluun, kävi ilmi, että monilla heistä ei ollut vaatteita. Lapset istuivat alasti sängyillä ja peittivät itsensä rievuilla. Lapset kiipesivät uuniin ja lämmittelivät itseään tuhkassa.
    ellauri279.html on line 195: In his lifetime, he worked as an actor, a photographer, an editor, a journalist and travel correspondent, as an author and as a professor of Russian. He was also the vice-president of the American branch of the International PEN club.
    ellauri279.html on line 197: When Yuri joined the faculty of the Department of German and Russian at UCD in January, 1989, none of his colleagues had any idea of the remarkable fifty-five years of his life that had preceded his arrival in Davis. Some of us were aware of the fact that he had been censored for his writing in the Soviet Union, but most, if not all of us, were ignorant of the attack leveled against him in 1974 by the newspaper Izvestiya, which accused him of having slandered the Soviet people, or of his having been removed from the Writers Union of the USSR in 1977 and declared “a traitor to the motherland” for his participation in the Samizdat underground publishing movement. In 1986, he was threatened by the KGB with either incarceration in a prison camp or confinement to a psychiatric ward, where he might well have languished had it not been for the intervention of Western writers such as Kurt Vonnegut and Arthur Miller, as well as, the International PEN-Club. Yuri was banished from his homeland a year later. He became a leading literary figure among Russian émigré writers while in exile, living first in Vienna, and then in Texas, before coming to California.
    ellauri279.html on line 199: In his sensational exposé, Informer 001 or the Myth of Pavlik Morozov, a product of research carried out clandestinely in the Soviet Union between 1980 and 1984, he demolished the long-standing, “official” Soviet version of the young, thirteen-year old “pioneer” (who never was) and communist martyr – designated, in 1934, a Soviet literary hero at the First Congress of Soviet Writers – who had turned in his father to the authorities for treasonable activity. The boy was subsequently murdered, according to the authorities, by members of his own family. The young Pavlik did, in fact, denounce his father, but, as Yuri demonstrates, he appears to have been put up to it by his mother, seeking revenge for her husband’s infidelity. As to who actually killed Pavlik, Yuri establishes that it was certainly not family members who were hauled before a Soviet court and subsequently executed. No less a literary figure than Alexander Solzhenitsyn hailed the publication of the book in 1987, claiming that it was “through books such as this that as many Soviet lies will eventually be told as revealed.”


    ellauri279.html on line 208: Dmitri Mikhailovich Alperovitch (born 1980) is a Russian American think-tank founder, investor, philanthropist, podcast host and former computer security industry executive. He is the chairman of Silverado Policy Accelerator, a geopolitics think-tank in Washington, D.C. and a co-founder and former chief technology officer of CrowdStrike. Alperovitch is a naturalized U.S. citizen born in Russia who came to the United States in 1994 with his family. Following Russian invasion of Ukraine, Alperovitch became the host of Geopolitics Decanted podcast, where he discusses current geopolitical events with militarily experts, historians, economists and political scientists. He is one of the 100 leading global thinkers in foreign policy 2013. Alperovitch even got a nod from President Trump when the leader (erroneously) called out CrowdStrike as “owned by a very rich Ukrainian.” (It’s assumed he was talking about Alperovitch, who is a cofounder and was born in Moscow to Russian parents.)
    ellauri279.html on line 213: Jose, justicialist party honcho and governor of Tucuman was charged by the Public Prosecutor for the complaint of sexual abuse by his niece.
    ellauri279.html on line 261: Hän (ei Randy) on eläkkeellä oleva nepsy neurokirurgi ja neurotieteilijä, reseptilääkkeiden toimittaja ja kirjailija, lääketieteen historioitsija ja etikkakurkku, kansanterveyskriitikko, ja Yhdysvaltain perustuslain toisen lisäyksen vankka puolustaja, kerrassaan vahva ääni oikealta Kuubasta.
    ellauri279.html on line 318: Rangaistuksen aluksi Solženitsyn oli kahdessa vankilassa Moskovassa. Sitten hänet siirrettiin lähiseudulle ojennustyöleirille, jossa hän kuljetti puutavaraa, ja seuraavaksi toiselle, jota kutsuttiin ”Uudeksi Jerusalemiksi”, jossa hän kaivoi savea. Sieltä hänet vietiin Kazakhstaniin leirille, jota kutsuttiin ”Galogan portiksi”, jossa lapioitiin potaskaa. Eli siis vuonna 1950 Solzhenitsyn lähetettiin poliittisten vankien "erityisleiriin" Ekbatanin kaupunkiin Kazakstaniin. Siellä hän työskenteli kaivosmiehenä, muurarina ja valimon työnjohtajana. Hänen kokemuksensa Ekibastuzissa muodostivat perustan kirjalle Yksi päivä Ivan Denisovichin elämässä.Hän koki moraalisen ja henkisen murtumisen yrittäessään vältellä vartijan vaatimuksia raportoida vankitovereistaan. Hän ei antanut tietoja. Hän viittasi noihin yhdeksään kuukauteen Galogan portissa elämänsä alhaisimpina aikoina. Tulipahan sentään tehtyä rehellistä työtä edes sekin aika.
    ellauri279.html on line 336: Vankileirien saaristo on kolmiosainen teos Neuvostoliiton ojennustyöleirijärjestelmästä. Se perustuu Solženitsynin omiin kokemuksiin, 227 vangin todistuksiin ja Solženitsynin omiin tutkimuksiin rankaisujärjestelmän historiasta. Siinä pohditaan järjestelmän alkuperää kommunistihallinnon perustamisesta asti, josta Lenin itse otti vastuun. Se kuvaa kuulusteluja, vankien kuljetuksia, vankilakulttuuria, vankien vastarintaa ja kapinointia sekä sisäisen karkotuksen harjoittamista. Kirjan julkaisu toi sanan "gulag" länsimaiden poliittiseen sanastoon ja takasi pikaisen rangaistuksen neuvostoviranomaisten taholta.
    ellauri279.html on line 376: Kirjallisuuskriitikko L. A. Anninsky uskoi, että Solženitsynillä oli historiallinen rooli "profeetana", "poliittisena hajoittajana", joka tuhosi järjestelmän, joka oli yhteiskunnan silmissä vastuussa toimintansa kielteisistä seurauksista, joista hän itse "tuli kauhistuneena".
    ellauri279.html on line 378: V. G. Rasputin uskoi, että Solženitsyn oli "sekä kirjallisuudessa että julkisessa elämässä ... yksi voimakkaimmista hahmoista koko Venäjän historiassa", "suuri moralisti, oikeudenmukainen mies, lahjakkuus".
    ellauri279.html on line 380: V. V. Putin sanoi, että kaikkien Solženitsynin tapaamistensa aikana "häntä hämmästytti joka kerta, kuinka orgaaninen ja vakuuttunut valtiomies Solženitsyn oli. Hän saattoi vastustaa olemassa olevaa hallintoa, olla eri mieltä hallituksen kanssa, mutta valtio oli hänelle vakio henkisessä historiassa." Iisain poika ei vastustanut putinismia.
    ellauri279.html on line 386: Historiatieteiden tohtori Georgi Tšernyavski huomautti, että Solženitsyn oli "hyvä kirjailija" mutta "erittäin huono historioitsija".
    ellauri279.html on line 418: 1998 - M. V. Lomonosovin mukaan nimetty suuri kultamitali - "erinomaisesta panoksesta venäläisen kirjallisuuden, venäjän kielen ja Venäjän historian kehittämiseen" (myönnetty 2. kesäkuuta 1999)
    ellauri279.html on line 462: Toinen romsku kertoo tarinan etuoikeutetusta nuoresta miehestä, jonka impulssit sosiaaliseen tasa-arvoon tukahduttavat hänen perheensä historiallisen materialismin.
    ellauri279.html on line 475: Meksikolainen historioitsija Enrique Krauze arvosti ankarasti Fuentesia ja hänen fiktiota ja kutsui häntä "sissidandyksi" hänen marxilaisen huulipolitiikkansa ja hänen henkilökohtaisen elämäntapansa välisestä erosta. Krauze syytti Fuentesia pepun myymisestä hallitukselle ja siitä, että se oli "poissa kosketuksesta Meksikoon" ja liioitteli sen ihmisiä houkuttelemaan ulkomaista yleisöä: "Meksikossa epäillään, että Fuentes vain käyttää Meksikoa teemana ja vääristelee sitä Pohjois-Amerikan yleisölle käyttäen valtakirjoja, joita hänellä ei ole."
    ellauri281.html on line 43: Taimen, huudahti Stalin innoissaan. Hei-hei, huopaa siiman suuntaan. Älä anna sen mennä veneen alle. Oh perse, käännä, käännä enemmän. Vasempaan, vasempaan senkin menshevikki! Mutta rähinöinnin päätteexi 3-kiloinen taimen nousi haavissa veneeseen. Stalin oli yhtä hymyä.
    - Jeesuxen äiti ärjäisi Stalin kiihkoissaan. Onpa mahtava kuha! Hän sai haavin kalan pyrstön taaxe ja sitä tietä veneen pohja rytkähti, kun 9-kiloinen kuha rummutti pyrstöllään pohjalautoja. Molotovia vähän hirvitti, mutta Stalin kohotti perämelan ja antoi kuhan niskaan nasakan iskun. Jättikala potki rajusti, värisi, pörhisti selkäevänsä ja oxensi kuollessaan puolenkymmentä kuoretta. - Sehän on lihava kuin Göring, ähkäisi Molotov.
    ellauri281.html on line 78: Šapošnikov oli yksi harvoista miehistä , joita Stalin puhutteli hänen kristinimellään ja sukunimellään. Mozg Armii on pysynyt Yleisesikuntaakatemian opetussuunnitelmassa sen julkaisemisesta vuonna 1929. Neuvostoliiton onneksi Shaposhnikovilla oli hieno sotilaallinen mieli ja korkeat hallinnolliset taidot. Hän yhdisti nämä kyvyt asemaansa Stalinin luottamuksessa rakentaakseen uudelleen puna-armeijan johtokaareja puhdistusten jälkeen. Hän sai Gulagilta vapautuksen 4 000 upseerista, jotka katsottiin tarpeellisiksi tätä operaatiota varten. Vuonna 1939 Stalin hyväksyi Šapošnikovin suunnitelman Puna-armeijan voiman nopeasta kasvattamisesta. Vaikka suunnitellut muutokset jäivät kesken akselin hyökkäyksen aikana kesäkuussa 1941, ne olivat edenneet riittävästi pelastaakseen Neuvostoliiton täydelliseltä katastrofilta.
    ellauri281.html on line 96: oikeastaan ollut laulua eikä soittoa, ei myöskään rallatusta. Aäni syntyi tanssijain röhistessä kurkkuaan, mikäli voin huomata etupäässä takapiässä sisään henkiessä. Olin välillä erottavinani joitakuita tajuttavia äänteitä, sentapaisia kuin: höö-him, hööhei, hoo-him, haaveli. Sitten taas luulin kuulevani: hinkin.
    ellauri281.html on line 97: hoo-hei, hinkin, höö-hei». Ezellasta. Riehuessaan Sozhissa kännipäissä Soselo (Pikku-Joose) saattoi mukeltaa yöhuutona: Houii möyy, höyäh, möö, mässähyhouii. Huutelun kuulleet sanoivat, että älämölöä ei ollut helppo litteroida.
    ellauri281.html on line 103: Jakovlev kieltää jyrkästi olettamuxet että Jopi köyri alkuperäiskansan keittäjää. Sensijaan hän omalla tavallaan rakasti lamuutin välittömyyttä ja luonnon lapsen raikkautta. Tästä ovat tiettävästi kertoneet useissakin yhteyksissä A. I. Mikojan ja O.V. Kuusinen. Tytön asuessa ensimmäisiä viikkojaan Stalinin datšassa Stalin hämmästeli hihkaisuja ja eräänlaisia riemunkiljaisuja, joita tyttö päästeli asioidessaan WC:ssä. Kun tämä toistui taas muutamana aamuna Stalinin ollessa teepöydässä. Stalin kysyi mitä tyttö oikein kiljui vessassa. Tyttö sanoi hänestä olevan hassua ja hauskaa, kun kakka lähtee viimeiselle matkalleen kosken kohistessa.
    ellauri281.html on line 107: Maa nousi mudasta. Se asetettiin lujalle jaloille. Kävi sodan läpi ja selvisi voittajana. Olen yllättynyt happamuudesta, jolla nykynuoret nyt kiroavat Stalinia. Loppujen lopuksi monet ovat syntyneet 91 vuoden jälkeen (oisko kolmannes). Tietämättä koko Stalinin historiaa he kastelevat sekä Stalinia itseään että sitä SUURTA maata virzalla ja loukkauksilla. Kyllä minä mieleni pahoitin.
    ellauri281.html on line 156: Vyshinsky first became a nationally known public figure as a result of the Semenchuk case of 1936. Konstantin Semenchuk was the head of the Glavsevmorput station on Wrangel Island. He was accused of oppressing and starving the local Yupik and of ordering his subordinate, the sledge driver Stepan Startsev, to murder Dr. Nikolai Vulfson, who had attempted to stand up to Semenchuk, on 27 December 1934 (though there were also rumors that Startsev had fallen in love with Vulfson's wife, Dr. Gita Feldman, and killed him out of jealousy). The case came to trial before the Supreme Court of the RSFSR in May 1936; both defendants, attacked by Vyshinsky as "human waste", were found guilty and shot, and "the most publicised result of the trial was the joy of the liberated Eskimos."
    ellauri281.html on line 158: In 1936, Vyshinsky achieved international fame as the prosecutor at the Zinoviev-Kamenev trial (this trial had nine other defendants), the first of the Moscow Trials during the Great Purge, lashing its defenseless victims with memorable rhetoric:
    ellauri281.html on line 160: Shoot these rabid dogs. Death to this gang who hide their ferocious teeth, their eagle claws, from the people! Down with that vulture Trotsky, from whose mouth a bloody venom drips, putrefying the great ideals of Marxism! ... Down with these abject animals! Let's put an end once and for all to these miserable hybrids of foxes and pigs, these stinking corpses! Let's exterminate the mad dogs of capitalism, who want to tear to pieces the flower of our new Soviet nation! Let's push the bestial hatred they bear our leaders back down their own throats!
    ellauri281.html on line 162: He often punctuated speeches with phrases like "Dogs of the Fascist bourgeoisie", "mad dogs of Trotskyism", "dregs of society", "decayed people", "terrorist thugs and degenerates", and "accursed vermin". This dehumanization aided in what historian Arkady Vaksberg calls "a hitherto unknown type of trial where there was not the slightest need for evidence: what evidence did you need when you were dealing with 'stinking carrion' and 'mad dogs'."
    ellauri281.html on line 166: He spoke good French, was quick, clever and efficient, and always knew his dossier well, but whereas I had a certain unwilling respect for Molotov, I had none at all for Vyshinsky. All Soviet officials at that time had no choice but to carry out Stalin's policies without asking too many questions, but Vyshinsky above all gave me the impression of a cringing toadie only too anxious to obey His Master's Voice even before it had expressed his wishes. ... I always had the feeling with Vyshinsky that his past as a Menshevik together with his Polish and bourgeois background made him particularly servile and obsequious in his dealings with Stalin and to a lesser extent with Molotov.
    ellauri281.html on line 168: Lenin taught us that "there has never been a single deep and mighty popular movement in history without filthy scum." Comrade Stalin warned us that
    ellauri281.html on line 170: We must bear in mind that the growth of the power of the Soviet state will increase the resistance of the last remnants of the dying classes. It is precisely because they are dying, and living their last days that they will pass from one form of attack to another, to sharper forms of attack, appealing to the backward strata of the population, and mobilizing them against the Soviet power. There is no foul lie or slander that these 'have-beens' would not use against the Soviet power and around which they would not try to mobilize the backward elements. This may give ground for the revival of the activities of the defeated groups of the old counter-revolutionary parties: the Socialist-Revolutionaries, the Mensheviks (glup), the bourgeois Malo-Russian nationalists (double glup) in the centre and in the outlying regions; it may give grounds also for the revival of the activities of the fragments of counter-revolutionary opposition elements from among the Trotskyites and the Right deviationists. Of course, there is nothing terrible in this. But we must bear all this in mind if we want to put an end to these elements quickly and without great loss."
    ellauri281.html on line 181: Siberian pensioner IS grandson of Josef Stalin, DNA test reveals. Yury Davydov, 67, gets proof of his roots after years of waiting: his grandmother was Stalin's 14 year old lover. Stalin a Pedo? what has the world come to?
    ellauri281.html on line 191: A distant relative of Aleksandr Pushkin, Georgy Chicherin was born into an old noble family. He was born on the estate of his uncle, Boris Chicherin, in Karaul, Tambov. His father, Vasily N. Chicherin, was a diplomat employed by the Foreign Office of the Russian Empire.
    ellauri281.html on line 193: In 1904, Chicherin inherited the estate of his famous uncle in Tambov Governorate and became very wealthy. He immediately used his new fortune to support revolutionary activities in the runup to the Russian Revolution of 1905 and was forced to flee abroad to avoid arrest late in that year. He spent the next 13 years in London, Paris and Berlin, where he joined the Menshevik faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party and was active in emigre politics. In Imperial Germany, he underwent medical treatment in attempts to cure his homosexuality.
    ellauri281.html on line 195: Chicherin followed a pro-German foreign policy in line with his anti-British attitudes, which he had developed during his time in the Foreign Ministry, when Britain was blocking Russian expansion in Asia. Chicherin is thought to have had more phone conversations with Lenin than anyone else. When Joseph Stalin replaced Lenin in 1924, Chicherin remained foreign minister, and Stalin valued his opinions.
    ellauri281.html on line 199: Chicherin was an eccentric, with obsessive work habits. Alexander Barmine, who worked in the People´s Commissariat for Foreign Affairs, noted that "Chicherin was a workaholic with peculiar habits. His workroom was completely buried in books, newspaper and documents. He used to patter into our room in his shirt sleeves, wearing a large silk handkerchief round his neck and slippers adorned with metal buckles ... which, for comfort´s sake, he never troubled to fasten, making a clicking noise on the floor." In 1930 Chicherin was formally replaced by his deputy, Maxim Litvinov. A continuing terminal illness burdened his last years, which forced him away from his circle of friends and active work and led to an early death.
    ellauri281.html on line 207: In January 1908, French police arrested Litvinov under the name Meer Wallach while carrying twelve 500-ruble banknotes that had been stolen in a bank robbery in Tiflis the year before. The Russian government demanded his extradition but the French Minister for Justice Aristide Briand ruled Litvinov´s crime was political and ordered him to be deported. He went to Belfast, Ireland, where he joined his sister Rifka and her family. There, he taught foreign languages in the Jewish Jaffe Public Elementary School until 1910.
    ellauri281.html on line 213: In February 1921, the Soviet government was approached by the government of the unilaterally declared Irish Republic in Dublin with proposals for a treaty of mutual recognition and assistance. Despairing of early American recognition for the Irish Republic, President of the Dáil Éireann Éamon De Valera had redirected his envoy Patrick McCartan from Washington to Moscow. McCartan may have assumed Litvinov, with his Irish experience, would be a ready ally. Litvinov, however, told McCarten the Soviet priority was a trade agreement with the UK.
    ellauri281.html on line 215: On 6 February 1933, Litvinov made the most-significant speech of his career, in which he tried to define aggression. He stated the internal situation of a country, alleged maladministration, possible danger to foreign residents, and civil unrest in a neighbouring country were not justifications for war. This speech became the authority when war was justified. British politician Anthony Eden had said; "to try to define aggression was a trap for the innocent and protection for the guilty". In 1946, the British Government supported Litvinov’s definition of aggression by accusing the Soviet Union of not complying with Litvinov’s definition of aggression. Finland made similar criticisms against the Soviet Union in 1939.
    ellauri281.html on line 223: In 1933, Litvinov was instrumental in winning a long-sought formal diplomatic recognition of the Soviet government by the United States. US President Franklin Roosevelt sent comedian Harpo Marx to the Soviet Union as a goodwill ambassador. Isosetä Karl oli näät disponibiliteetissa. Litvinov and Marx became friends and performed a routine on stage together. Litvinov also facilitated the acceptance of the Soviet Union into the League of Nations, where he represented his country from 1934 to 1938. Litvinov has been considered to have concentrated on taking strong measures against Italy, Japan and Germany, and being little interested in other matters.
    ellauri281.html on line 225: After the 1938 Munich Agreement, German state media derided Maxim Litvinov for his Jewish ancestry, referring to him as "Finkelstein-Litvinov". The Munich Agreement (Czech: Mnichovská dohoda; Slovak: Mníchovská dohoda; German: Münchner Abkommen) was an agreement concluded at Munich on 30 September 1938, by Nazi Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy. The agreement provided for the German annexation of land on the border between Czechoslovakia and Germany called the Sudetenland, where more than three million people, mainly ethnic Germans, lived. The pact is also known in "some areas" as the Munich Betrayal (Czech: Mnichovská zrada; Slovak: Mníchovská zrada), because of a previous 1924 alliance agreement and a 1925 military pact between France and the Czechoslovak Republic.
    ellauri281.html on line 228: On 30 September, Czechoslovakia yielded to the combination of military pressure by Germany, Poland, and Hungary, and diplomatic pressure by the United Kingdom and France, and agreed to give up territory to Germany on Munich terms. Then, on 1 October, Czechoslovakia also accepted Polish territorial demands. Much of Europe celebrated the Munich Agreement, as they considered it a way to prevent a major war on the continent. Adolf Hitler announced that it was his last territorial claim in Northern Europe. Today, the Munich Agreement is widely regarded as a failed act of appeasement, and the term has become a byword for the futility of appeasing expansionist totalitarian states.
    ellauri281.html on line 230: On 3 May 1939, Stalin replaced Litvinov, who was closely identified with the anti-German position, with Vyacheslav Molotov. At a prearranged meeting, Stalin said: "The Soviet Government intended to improve its relations with Hitler and if possible sign a pact with Nazi Germany. As a Jew and an avowed opponent of such a policy, Litvinov stood in the way." Litvinov argued and banged on the table. Stalin then demanded Litvinov to sign a letter of resignation. On the night of Litvinov´s dismissal, NKVD troops surrounded the offices of the Commissariat of Foreign Affairs. The telephone at Litvinov´s dacha was disconnected and the following morning, Molotov, Georgy Malenkov, and Lavrenty Beria arrived at the commissariat to inform Litvinov of his dismissal. Many of Litvinov´s aides were arrested and beaten, possibly to extract compromising information.
    ellauri281.html on line 239: The imperialists in these two countries had done everything they could to goad Hitler’s Germany against the Soviet Union by secret deals and provocative moves. In the circumstances the Soviet Union could either accept German proposals for a non-aggression treaty and thus secure a period of peace in which to redouble preparations to repulse the aggressor; or turn down Germany’s proposals and let the warmongers in the Western camp push the Soviet Union into an armed conflict with Germany in unfavourable circumstances and in a setting of complete isolation. In this situation the Soviet Government was compelled to make the difficult choice and conclude a non-aggression treaty with Germany. I, too, would probably have concluded a pact with Germany although a bit differently.
    ellauri281.html on line 243: Given Litvinov´s prior attempts to create an anti-fascist coalition, association with the doctrine of collective security with France and Britain, and pro-Western orientation by Kremlin standards, his dismissal indicated the existence of a Soviet option of rapprochement with Germany. Molotov´s appointment was a signal to Germany the USSR would negotiate. The dismissal also signaled to France and Britain the existence of a potential negotiation option with Germany. One British official wrote Litvinov´s disappearance meant the loss of an admirable technician or shock-absorber, while Molotov´s modus operandi was "more truly Bolshevik than diplomatic or cosmopolitan".
    ellauri281.html on line 247: In the 21-month period between the declaration of war by France and Britain, and the invasion of the Soviet Union by Germany, Ivy Litvinov describes this period of her life. She said the family spent their time with their daughter-in-law in their dacha 27 kilometres (17 mi) from Moscow and outside school holidays in the family apartment in Moscow, when they spent long weekends in the country. For two years, the family played bridge, read music, and went on long walks in the countryside with their two dogs.
    ellauri281.html on line 251: Even to Litvinov, the German invasion of the Soviet Union was a surprise; he did not believe Hitler would risk embarking on a second front at this stage of the war. Churchill informed the world Hitler´s actions were not a surprise to him, and that a victory over the USSR by Hitler would be a catastrophe for the British Empire.
    ellauri281.html on line 253: Early in November 1941, Litvinov was summoned to see Stalin and told his services were required as ambassador to the United States. In the US, the appointment was met with enthusiasm. The New York Times stated: "Stalin has decided to place his ablest and most forceful diplomat and one who enjoys greater prestige in this country. He is known as a man of exceptional ability, adroit as well as forceful. It is believed that Stalin, in designating him for the ambassadorship, felt Litvinov could exercise real influence in Washington."
    ellauri281.html on line 259: After returning to Soviet Union, Litvinov became deputy minister for foreign affairs. He was dismissed from his post after an interview given to Richard C. Hottelet on 18 June 1946 in which he said a war between the West and the Soviet Union was inevitable.
    ellauri281.html on line 261: Maxim Litvinov died on on 31 December 1951. After his death, rumours he was murdered on Stalin´s instructions to the Ministry of Internal Affairs circulated. According to Anastas Mikoyan, alorry deliberately collided with Litvinov´s car as it rounded a bend near the Litvinov dacha on 31 December 1951, and he later died of his injuries. British television journalist Tim Tzouliadis stated; "The assassination of Litvinov marked an intensification of Stalin´s anti-Semitic campaign". According to Litvinov´s wife and daughter, however, Stalin was still on good terms with Litvinov at the time of his death. They said he had serious heart problems and was given the best treatment available during the final weeks of his life, and that he died from a heart attack on 31 December 1951. After Litvinov´s death, his widow Ivy remained in the Soviet Union until she returned to live in Britain in 1972.
    ellauri281.html on line 263: In his reminiscences dictated to a supporter later in life, Vyacheslav Molotov—Litvinov´s replacement as chief of foreign affairs and right-hand man of Joseph Stalin—said Litvinov was "intelligent" and "first rate" but said he and Stalin "didn´t trust him" and consequently "left him out of negotiations" with the United States during the war. Molotov called Litvinov "not a bad diplomat—a good one" but also called him quite an opportunist who greatly sympathized with Leon Trotsky, Grigory Zinoviev, and Lev Kamenev. According to Molotov; Litvinov remained among the living in the Great Purge only by chance.
    ellauri281.html on line 270:
    Molotov, Stalin ja Voroshilov 1937 suunnittelevat remuiltaa Sotshissa.

    ellauri281.html on line 295: Ala-Lausitzin merkittävimpiä kaupunkeja ovat Cottbus, Eisenhüttenstadt, Guben, Forst, Luckau, Finsterwalde, Senftenberg, Spremberg, Bad Muskau, Puolan puolella sijaitseva Żary, Vetschau, Lübben ja Lübbenau sekä länsilaidalla Herzberg. Ylä-Lausitzin merkittävimpiä kaupunkeja ovat Bautzen, Görlitz, Lubań, Zittau, Löbau ja Kamenz sekä Niesky, Hoyerswerda ja Weißwasser. Cottbus on koko Lausitzin alueen väestöllisesti suurin kaupunki. Bautzen on historiallisesti Ylä-Lausitzin pääkaupunki ja Luckau Ala-Lausitzin.
    ellauri281.html on line 325: Limp Bizkit is an American rap rock band from Jacksonville, Florida. Its lineup consists of lead vocalist Fred Durst, drummer John Otto, guitarist Wes Borland, turntablist DJ Lethal and bassist Sam Rivers. The band's music is marked by Durst's angry vocal delivery and Borland's sonic experimentation. Borland's elaborate visual appearance, which includes face and body paint, masks, and uniforms, also plays a large role in Limp Bizkit´s live shows. The band has been nominated for three Grammy Awards, sold 40 million records worldwide, and won several other awards. The band has released 26 singles, the most notable of which include "Nookie", "Re-Arranged", "Break Stuff", "Take a Look Around", "Rollin' (Air Raid Vehicle)." Formed in 1994, Limp Bizkit became popular playing in the Jacksonville underground music scene in the late 1990s. n October 28, 2021, Durst confirmed via Instagram that the band's sixth album – now titled Still Sucks – would be released on October 31, 2021. Durst's lyrics are often profane, scatological or angry. Much of Durst´s lyrical inspiration came from growing up and his personal life. I did it all for the nookie [slang for sexual intercourse].
    ellauri281.html on line 336: Neuvostopropaganda käytti jonkun typerän "luokkasodan" retoriikkaa vetoaen vallankumouksen ja sisällissodan parhaisiin perinteisiin. Komentaja Tymoshenkon vetoomus puolalaisille sotilaille kehotti heitä tappamaan upseerinsa: "Lupseerit ajavat teidät järjettömään teurastukseen. He vihaavat sinua ja perhettäsi. Älä luota upseereihisi. Upseerit ja kenraalit ovat vihollisesi, he haluavat sinun kuolevan! Sotilaat - lyö upseerit ja kenraalit! Älä tottele upseerisi käskyjä. Aja heidät pois maastasi." Ihan hyviä ohjeita, oli maa mikä tahansa. Kun älymystöpolakit eivät älynneet tehdä sitä ize, neuvostolaiset hoiti homman jezulleen.
    ellauri281.html on line 363:
    Prof. Orshosh ruumiinavauksessa. Lähistöllä ovat prof. Markov (Bulgaria) ja prof. Arno Saxen (Suomi, verikauhassa). Professori F. Orshoshin käyttämä kallon tilan mukainen ajoitusmenetelmä ei löytänyt riittävää myöhempää vahvistusta lääketieteellisessä käytännössä, mistä prof. Saxen kyllä huomautti.

    ellauri281.html on line 385: Koko sen ajan, kun neuvostoliittolaiset ja puolalaiset historioitsijat etsivät asiakirjoja Katynista, Katyniin liittyviä tärkeimpiä politbyroon asiakirjoja säilytettiin NKP:n keskuskomitean arkiston (jäljempänä Presidentinarkisto) salaisessa erityiskansiossa; MS Gorbatšov tiesi heidän olemassaolostaan. B. N. Jeltsin sai Erikoiskansion asiakirjat henkilökohtaisesti Gorbatšovilta, kun tämä oli siirtänyt vallan. Kahdeksan kuukautta myöhemmin, 24. syyskuuta 1992, paketti nro 1, joka sisälsi Katyniin liittyviä asiakirjoja, avattiin.
    ellauri281.html on line 394: Vuonna 2011 Venäjän viranomaiset ilmoittivat olevansa valmiita harkitsemaan kysymystä teloituksen uhrien kuntouttamisesta. 2000-luvulla ja varsinkin 2010-luvulla neuvostoversiota puoltavat äänet kuuluivat jälleen Venäjän historiallisessa yhteisössä. Kielteiset kriitikot huomauttavat, että he eivät julkaisuissaan pysähdy suoranaisiin valheisiin vaan turvautuvat pitkään kiistettyjen lausuntojen toistamiseen, luottaen lukijoiden tietämättömyyteen.
    ellauri281.html on line 398: Katynin verilöylyn aihe esiintyy säännöllisesti Puolan ja Venäjän lehdistössä. Lech Kaczynski totesi, että sillä on edelleen tärkeä paikka puolalaisten kansallisessa historiallisessa muistissa, kun taas valtaosa venäläisistä kyselyn mukaan pitää sitä merkityksettömänä.
    ellauri281.html on line 400: 24. kesäkuuta 2022 ilmestyi tieto, että Puolan lippu poistettiin Katynin muistomerkkikompleksista. Katynin hallinto vahvisti, että 24. kesäkuuta "Puolan lipun puuttuminen havaittiin", mutta ohjasi muut toimittajien kysymykset Venäjän nykyhistorian museoon, jolle muistomerkki kuuluu. Smolenskin pormestari Andrei Borisov sanoi, että päätöksen teki kulttuuriministeriö. Ukrainan lippuakaan ei ole näkynyt.
    ellauri281.html on line 441: his-gun.jpg/270px-Thompson-and-his-gun.jpg" />
    ellauri281.html on line 536: Saksan armeijan valmistautuminen sotaan alkoi elokuussa 1940 salanimellä Friz, ja sitä koordinoi kenraali Friedrich Pauluksen johtama ryhmä syyskuusta alkaen. Hitlerin uuden päämajan Wolfschanzen rakentaminen aloitettiin Itä-Preussiin Rastenburgin kaupungin lähelle. Lopullinen päiväkäsky nro. 21 nimellä operaatio Barbarossa allekirjoitettiin 18. joulukuuta. Sodasta piti tulla lyhyt. Joseph Goebbels kirjoitti päiväkirjaansa keskustelusta Hitlerin kanssa: ”Vihollinen ajetaan taaksepäin yhdellä tasaisella liikkeellä. Führer arvioi operaatioon kuluvan neljä kuukautta. Minä luulen, että vähemmän. Bolševismi luhistuu kuin korttitalo.”
    ellauri281.html on line 553: - Minua alkaa tympäistä koko Hitler, karjaisee Stalin isolla äänellä. Siitä miehestä olen kohta saanut tarpeekseni. Aina se on puhumassa ja raakkumassa joka paikassa. Aina se tyrkyttää toisille omia oppejaan. Minun nähdäkseni vain kommunismia saa levittää, ei muita oppeja. Ei se sitäpaizi ole mikään oppi, se on historiallinen välttämättömyys.
    ellauri281.html on line 571: Sillä kyllä jumalaton aina jumalisen voittaa, naurahtaa Stalim. Tulevina vuosikymmeninä ateistit vievät voiton jeesusmiehistä. Jeesusmies rukoilee ja hymisee, mutta ateisti toimii ja luottaa omaan voimaansa. Näin arvelee Stalin ja nykäisee ylleen univormun takin. Hän ottaa suuresta peltipurkista mahorkkaa tupakkakukkaroonsa ja leikkaa nahistuneesta kurkusta pari ohutta viipaletta
    ellauri281.html on line 576: Ettei vaan lännen optimismi Putinismin pikaisesta luhistumisesta kuin korttitalo olisi yhtä huonosti ennakoitua...
    ellauri282.html on line 102: If you are interested in a unique David Hume Turban for yourself, you can email the Edinburgh University Philosophy Society, who are offering a special promotion of £120 per hat (excl. Shipping&Handling). This offer will be open until August 1st.
    ellauri282.html on line 131: Se koostuu intialaisen jesuiittaveli Anthony de Mellon luennoista, jotka hän piti hengellisessä konferenssissa New Yorkissa. Anthony de Mellon luennoissa riittää pureksittavaa koko elämän ajaksi. Hän avartaa henkisen elämän horisontteja purkamalla elämänvalheita ja ehdollistumia, jotka sumentavat ymmärrystä ja kaventavat elämää. ”Kyseessä eivät ole mitkään herätyspuheet vaan sarja reippaita sivalluksia pakoilevan, pöyhistelevän ja ihanteellisen ihmisen kuten Matin korville.” – Kirkko ja Kaupunki
    ellauri282.html on line 414: Hän matkusti paljon tapaillessaan heitä ja osallistuessaan kansainvälisiin uskontokonferensseihin. Lisäksi hän kirjoitti kirjoja zen-buddhalaisuudesta, konfutselaisuudesta ja taolaisuudesta ja miten kristinuskon tulisi liittyä niihin. Tämä oli erittäin epätavallista tuolloin Yhdysvalloissa, erityisesti uskonnollisissa järjestöissä. (Tuskin paavi Ratzingerkaan oli järin innostunut tästä. He probably shat in his hat.)
    ellauri282.html on line 464: Merton tutustui ensimmäisen kerran itämaisiin uskontoihin ja kiinnostui niistä, kun hän luki Aldous Huxleyn Ends and Means -kirjan vuonna 1937, vuosi ennen hänen kääntymistään katolilaisuuteen. Koko elämänsä ajan hän opiskeli buddhalaisuutta, konfutselaisuutta, taolaisuutta, hindulaisuutta, sikhismiä, jainismia ja surfismia akateemisten ja luostariopintojensa lisäksi.
    ellauri282.html on line 470: Noudattaen ajatustaan, että ei-kristillisillä uskoilla oli paljon annettavaa kristillisyydelle kokemuksen ja perspektiivin suhteen ja vähän tai ei mitään opin suhteen, Merton erotti zen-buddhalaisuuden, historian ja kulttuurin ilmaisun, ja Zenin välillä. Mitä Merton tarkoitti zen-buddhalaisuudella, oli Kiinasta alkanut ja Japaniin levinnyt uskonto sekä sitä seuranneet rituaalit ja instituutiot. Zenillä Merton tarkoitti jotain, jota kulttuuri, uskonto tai vakaumus ei sido. Tässä ominaisuudessa Merton sai vaikutteita Aelred Grahamin kirjasta Zen Catholicism of 1963. Tämä ajatus mielessä, Mertonin myöhempien zeniä koskevien kirjoitusten voidaan ymmärtää tulevan yhä enemmän kehittyvän ja laajenevan zen-perinteen sisältä, joka ei ole erityisen buddhalainen, mutta perustuu Mertonin luostarikoulutukseen kristillisen perinteen puitteissa.
    ellauri282.html on line 472: Merton tutki myös Amerikan intiaanien henkisyyttä. Hän kirjoitti sarjan artikkeleita Amerikan intiaanien historiasta ja hengellisyydestä The Catholic Worker-, The Center Magazine-, Theoria to Theory- ja Unicorn Journal- julkaisuihin. Hän tutki sellaisia ​​teemoja kuin Amerikan intiaanipaasto ja lähetystyö.
    ellauri282.html on line 497: Lumikki ja 7 kääpiötä on tämän trappistimunkin ja tunnetun kirjailijan omaelämäkerta. Apotti kannusti häntä luostaruuden käsitteen uudelleenmäärittelyyn ja pyhyyden tekemiseen nykyaikaisexi. Hän teki työtä käskettyä, ja kirja alkoi vuotaa hänestä. Merton lopetti kirjan vuonna 1946 ollessaan 31-vuotias, ja se julkaistiin hänen ollessaan 33-vuotias vuonna 1948. Hän työskenteli kirjan parissa ollessaan Gethsemani Abbeyssa lähellä Bardstownia Kentuckyssa. Otsikko viittaa Kiiras-tulivuoreen Danten Jumalallisessa näytelmässä. (Eilen oli muuten kiirastorstai, se on Maundy Thursday. Maundy on ehtoolliskäsky. Torstaina syötiin miehissä vika kerran kunnolla. Silloin alkoi näet Ramadan. Kissa heittäytyi rukoilevan šeikin syliin kesken ramadan-rituaalin. Ramadanin juhlamenoihin osallistui Algeriassa yllättäen kissa. Šeikki Walid Mehsas jakoi videon virallisella Facebook-sivullaan.)
    ellauri282.html on line 524: Whích What Hanhi (/ˈtɪk ˈnjʌt ˈhʌn/ TIK NYUHT HUHN; Vietnamese: [tʰǐk̟ ɲə̌t hâjŋ̟ˀ] (listen); born Nguyễn Xuân Bảo; 11 October 1926 – 22 January 2022) oli vietnamilainen Thiền-buddhalainen munkki, rauhanaktivisti, tuottelias kirjailija, runoilija ja opettaja, joka perusti Luumu Kylä Perinteen, joka on historiallisesti tunnustettu tärkeimmäksi innoituxexi sitoutuneelle buddhalaisuudelle. "Mindfulnessin isänä" tunnettu Nhất Hạnh oli merkittävä vaikutus buddhalaisuuden länsimaisiin käytäntöihin. Mindfulness (skr. smrti, pal. sati) tarkoittaa muistoa. Sitä mikä palaa mieleen. Lännessä hän on ikoni. En voi ajatella länsimaista buddhalaista, joka ei tiedä Thich Nhất Hạnhista. Selvä länkkäreiden agentti. Tätähän muuten tutki Antti Niemen tytär Maisu, ei saanut juuri mitään mitattavaa tulosta, mutta perusti siitä huolimatta mindfulness-toimiston Tukholman vanhaan kaupunkiin, joka varmaan vetää väkeä kuin häkä. 2019 raportoitiin, että Nhất Hạnhin kannattamasta mindfulnessista oli tullut teoreettinen perusta 1.1 miljardin dollarin teollisuudelle Yhdysvalloissa. Eräässä tutkimuksessa todettiin, että 35% työnantajista käytti mindfulnessia työpaikan käytännöissä. Varsinaista ison rahan vedätystä siis!
    ellauri282.html on line 548:

    Maailmanhistorian mysteerejä


    ellauri282.html on line 550: Briteillä on maailmanhistoriassa monta miettimisen paikkaa. Kreikkalaiset paini pylly paljaana, siinähän voi nähdä toistensa pyllynreikään sisälle. Mixei ne voineet käyttää pikku jamihousuja?
    ellauri283.html on line 114: Beyond the Heavens is a very ethereal and mystical experience, one unlike any other movie we have reviewed. However, this is not a good thing. The ‘plot’ is very unclear and murky, consisting of vague and meandering ideas and cryptic dialogue. It’s like Corbin Bernson is winking at the audience with every scene, waiting to reveal some great secret, but it’s never revealed. The whole has a very tip-of-the-tongue feel, like the characters know something you don’t but never intend to let you in on the secret. As the characters wax eloquent and philosophize about the true nature of reality, the viewer is left, in the end, with a more confusing view of reality than before. Is Bernson advocating for or against Darwinism? Is he a creationist? Does he really believe that angels come to earth on the tails of comets? Is Bernson suggesting that reality is not what it seems? If so, what is his view of reality? Only God knows the answers to these questions as Bernson spends 90 minutes toying with his ‘big reveal’ and dancing around whatever his philosophical worldview is. It’s basically just a waste of your time.
    ellauri283.html on line 116: And what is to be made of Corbin Bernsen? What is his place in Christian film? Is he trolling? Is he a great mind misunderstood? Whether it’s abstract musings like Beyond the Heavens or half-hearted satire like Christian Mingle or In-Lawfully Yours, Bernsen’s motivations for making Christian films are very unclear. It’s possible that he’s smarter than us all and doesn’t know how to show it. But it’s also possible that he’s just trying to make a quick buck off of Christian audiences. Reality is probably somewhere in between. Regardless, Beyond the Heavens really needed to be rethought before anyone spent money on it, because it falls flat and is unable to properly convey whatever message it is trying to present.
    ellauri283.html on line 120: It's different and I loved it! It raises the question is there a God and answers it in a wonderful way. I don't want to give the story away, (aah, WTF, here goes: there is a God, but his name is Allah. Sorry...) - you have to watch and keep your eyes on Barlow, he is an angel for sure! And there really are angels, consult your Bibble (Hebrews) or Koran (passim)!
    ellauri283.html on line 141: Osa viisi: Moraalin luonnonhistoria
    ellauri283.html on line 186: Heikki ja Kaija on parodia samannimisestä televisiosarjasta 1960- ja 1970-luvulta. Pariskunta esimerkiksi kauhistelee kovaan ääneen, kuinka eräs tuttu ei ottanut lakkia pois päästään sisällä, kun taas esimerkiksi tutun eläkeläispariskunnan tekemä itsemurha kerrostalon katolta kuitataan vain Heikin lausahduksella: "Jaa. No annaksää mulle kaffetta?" Keskustelua värittävät lukuisat "nääs nääs" -lausahdukset kädenliikkeillä ja päänpudistuksilla vahvennettuna. Voivottelujen pituudet vähitellen kasvavat ja tulevat jopa raivokkaiksi.
    ellauri283.html on line 248: Det oljerika Sudan har ett förflutet som brittisk koloni, vet HBL. Men det är inte hela historien, ser det ut.
    ellauri283.html on line 267: Sudanin historia viittaa Sudanin tasavallan alueeseen, mukaan lukien se, josta vuonna 2011 tuli itsenäinen Etelä-Sudanin valtio Niilin latvoilla. Sudanin alue on maantieteellisesti osa suurempaa Afrikan aluetta, joka tunnetaan myös nimellä "Sudan ". Termi on johdettu arabiasta : بلاد السودان bilād as-sūdān eli "mustan miehen maa", ja sitä on joskus käytetty laajemmin viitaten Länsi- ja Keski-Afrikan Sahelin vyöhykkeeseen. Musta mies!
    ellauri283.html on line 271: Niilin alueella Pohjois-Sudanissa sijainneen Kushin kuningaskunnan varhainen historia kietoutuu muinaisen Egyptin historiaan, jonka kanssa se oli poliittisesti liittoutunut useiden hallituskausien aikana. Egyptin läheisyyden ansiosta Sudan osallistui Lähi-idän laajempaan historiaan, kun Egyptin tärkeä 25. dynastia ja kolme Nubian kuningaskuntaa, Nobatia, Makuria ja Alodia, kristillistyivät kuudennella vuosisadalla. Kristillistymisen seurauksena vanha nubian kieli on vanhin tallennettu Niilosaharan kieli (varhaisimmat tiedot 800-luvulta koptilaisiiin aakkosiin mukautettuna). Neekeri oli egyptixi Ne-hash-Kush ("ne haisevat kuselta"), väitti Wettenhovi-Aspa, osoittaaxeen että egyptiläiset puhuivat keskenänsä suomea.
    ellauri283.html on line 275: Sudanin itsenäistymisestä vuonna 1956 lähtien Sudanin historiaa ovat vaivanneet aivan käsittämättömät ihan vaan sisäiset konfliktit, kuten ensimmäinen Sudanin sisällissota (1955–1972), toinen Sudanin sisällissota (1983–2005), Darfurin sota (2003–2010), huipentui Etelä-Sudanin irtautumiseen 9. heinäkuuta 2011, minkä jälkeen siellä käytiin toinen sisällissota (2013-2020). Kolmas on jo hyvällä alulla (2023).
    ellauri283.html on line 279: Itä-Sudanissa Butana-ryhmä esiintyy kasvaville yleisöille noin 4000 eaa. Nämä ihmiset tuottivat yksinkertaista koristeltua keramiikkaa (ceramics), asuivat pyöreissä majoissa ja olivat todennäköisimmin paimenia, metsästäjiä, mutta myös söivät etanoita, ja maataloudesta on todisteita. [6] Gash Group sai alkunsa noin 3000 eKr. ja on toinen esihistoriallinen kulttuuri, joka tunnetaan useista paikoista. Nämä ihmiset valmistivat koristeltua keramiikkaa ja elivät maanviljelystä ja karjankasvatuksesta. Mahal Teglinos oli noin 10 hehtaarin kokoinen tärkeä paikka. Keskustassa kaivettiin savitiilistä rakennettuja taloja. Sinetit ja sinettijäljet ​​osoittavat korkeamman hallinnon tason. Hautaukset eliittihautausmaalla oli merkitty tahallisen karkeilla hautakivillä. Toisella vuosituhannella seurasiJebel Mokram Group Inc. He valmistivat keramiikkaa, jossa oli tyylikkään yksinkertainen viiloitettu koristelu, ja asuivat yksinkertaisissa pyöreissä majoissa. Naudankasvatus oli mitä todennäköisimmin taloudellinen perusta.
    ellauri283.html on line 281: Pohjois-Sudanin varhaisimmat historialliset tiedot ovat peräisin muinaisista egyptiläisistä lähteistä, jotka kuvailivat ylävirran maata Kushiksi. Egyptin vanhalla kuningaskunnalla ( n. 2700–2180 eKr.) oli yli kahden tuhannen vuoden ajan hallitseva ja merkittävä vaikutus eteläiseen naapuriinsa, ja sen jälkeenkin egyptiläisten kulttuuristen ja uskonnollisten esittelyjen perintö säilyi tärkeänä.
    ellauri283.html on line 287: Kun Egypti oli saavuttanut poliittisen ja sotilaallisen vallan Kushissa, virkamiehiä, pappeja, kauppiaita ja käsityöläisiä asettuivat alueelle. Egyptin kieltä käytettiin laajalti jokapäiväisessä toiminnassa. Monet rikkaat kushilaiset ryhtyivät palvomaan egyptiläisiä jumalia ja rakensivat heille temppeleitä. Temppelit olivat virallisen uskonnollisen palvonnan keskuksia, kunnes kristinusko tuli alueelle kuudennen vuosisadan aikana. Kun egyptiläinen vaikutus väheni tai antautui vieraan vallan herruuteen, Kushipää-eliitti piti itseään keskusvaltana ja uskoi olevansa egyptiläisen kulttuurin ja uskonnon idoleita. Ja syystä kyllä!
    ellauri283.html on line 289: Sillä 1000-luvulle eKr. tultaessa Uuden kuningaskunnan dynastioiden arvovalta oli heikentynyt, mikä mahdollisti jaetun hallinnon Egyptissä ja lopetti egyptiläisten vallan Kushissa. Kun egyptiläiset vetäytyivät, Kushilta lakkasi olemasta kirjallisia tietoja tai tietoja alueen toiminnasta seuraavien kolmensadan vuoden aikana. Kahdeksannen vuosisadan alussa eKr. Kush kuitenkin nousi itsenäiseksi kuningaskunnaksi, jota hallitsi napakka aggressiivinen monarkkilinja, joka laajensi hitaasti vaikutusvaltaansa Egyptiin. Noin 750 eaa., Kushilainen kuningas nimeltä Wilho valloitti Ylä-Egyptin ja hänestä tuli Theban hallitsija noin vuoteen 740 eKr. asti. Hänen seuraajansa Pive kukisti Niilin suistonja valloitti Egyptin ja aloitti siten 25. dynastian. Pive perusti kuninkaiden linjan, joka hallitsi Kushia ja Thebea noin sata vuotta. Dynastian puuttuminen Assyrian vaikutuspiiriin Lähi-idässä aiheutti vastakkainasettelun Egyptin ja voimakkaan Assyrian valtion välillä, joka hallitsi valtavaa valtakuntaa, joka käsitti suuren osan Lähi-idästä, Anatoliasta, Kaukasuksesta [ tarvitaan lainaus ] ja itäisen Välimeren altaasta heidän kotimaassaan Ylä-Mesopotamiassa. Taharqan, (688–663 eKr.), viimeisen kusilaisten faaraon, voitti ja ajoi pois Lähi-idästä Assyrialainen Sanherib toimekkaana. Sanheribin seuraaja Esa Shariola meni vielä pidemmälle käynnistäen täyden hyökkäyksen Egyptiin vuonna 674 eKr., kukistaen Taraqan ja valloittaen nopeasti maan. Torakka pakeni takaisin Nubiaan, ja assyrialaiset asettivat alkuperäiset egyptiläiset ruhtinaat Esa Shaddonin vasalliksi. Tarakka pystyi kuitenkin palaamaan joitakin vuosia myöhemmin ja kaatamaan osan Egyptistä aina Thebaan asti Assyrian väpelöiltä egyptiläisiltä vasalliruhtinailta. Esa Shaddon kuoli kaikexi onnexi pääkaupungissaan Ninivessä valmistautuessaan palaamaan Egyptiin ja karkottamaan taas kushilaiset.
    ellauri283.html on line 293: Egyptin seuraava dynastia ei onnistunut saamaan Kushin täyttä hallintaansa. Noin 590 eKr. Egyptin armeija kuitenkin potkaisi napakasti Napataa, mikä pakotti kushilaisen hovin siirtymään turvallisempaan paikkaan etelämpänä Meroëssa, lähellä kuudetta kaihia. Useiden vuosisatojen ajan sen jälkeen Meroliittinen valtakunta kehittyi riippumattomasti egyptiläisestä vaikutuksesta ja herruudesta, joka sillä aikaa siirtyi peräkkäin Iranin, Kreikan ja lopulta Rooman vallan alle. Vallansa huipulla toisella ja kolmannella vuosisadalla eKr. Meroë ulottui alueen yli kolmannesta kaihista pohjoisessa Zhobaan, lähellä nykyistä Khartumia etelässä. Egyptiläisvaikutteinen faaraoninen perinne säilyi Meroën hallitsijoiden joukossa, jotka pystyttivät stela-kuvia tallentaakseen hallituskautensa saavutuksia ja pystyttivät nubialaisia ​​pyramideja haudoillensa. Voisi sanoa että ne olivat ebyktiläisempiä kuin eebyktiläiset ize. Nämä esineet ja Meroën palatsien, temppelien ja kylpylöiden rauniot todistavat keskitetystä epädemokraattisesta poliittisesta järjestelmästä, joka käytti käsityöläisten taitoja ja johti suuren työvoiman työtä. Hyvin hoidettu kastelujärjestelmä mahdollisti alueen suuremman asukastiheyden kuin myöhempinä ajanjaksoina oli mahdollista. Ensimmäisellä vuosisadalla eaa. egyptiläisten hieroglyfien käyttö teki tietä meroitilaiselle aakkostolle, joka oli mukautettu nubian kielelle mitä alueen mustat miehet puhuvat.
    ellauri283.html on line 300: Toisella vuosisadalla jKr muuan Nobatia miehitti Niilin länsirannan Pohjois-Kushissa. Heidän uskotaan olleen yksi useista hyvin aseistetuista hevos- ja kamelien kantamien soturien joukoista, jotka myivät taitonsa Meroëlle suojelukseksi; lopulta he menivät naimisiin ja vakiintuivat Meroitic kansan keskuudessa sotilaallisena aristokratiana. Lähes viidennelle vuosisadalle saakka Rooma tuki Nobodyja ja käytti Meroëa puskurina Egyptin ja Blemmyjen välillä.
    ellauri283.html on line 373: Sudan luotti useisiin maihin asetoimituksissaan. Armeijaa olivat itsenäistymisestä lähtien kouluttaneet ja toimittaneet britit, mutta suhteet britteihin katkesivat Arabi-Israelin kuuden päivän sodan jälkeen vuonna 1967. Samaan aikaan katkesivat myös suhteet Yhdysvaltoihin ja Länsi-Saksaan. Vuodesta 1968 vuoteen 1971 Neuvostoliitto ja itäblokin maat myivät suuria määriä aseita ja tarjosivat teknistä apua ja koulutusta Sudanille. Tällä hetkellä armeija kasvoi 18 000 miehestä noin 60 000 mieheen. Suuri määrä tankkeja, lentokoneet ja tykistö hankittiin tuolloin, ja ne hallitsivat armeijaa 1980-luvun lopulle asti. Osapuolten suhteet kylmenivät vuoden 1971 oikeistovallan kaappauksen jälkeen, ja Khartumin hallitus pyrki monipuolistamaan toimittajiaan. Egypti oli 1970-luvun tärkein sotilaallinen kumppani, joka toimitti ohjuksia, miehistönkuljetusaluksia ja muuta sotilaallista laitteistoa.
    ellauri283.html on line 468: Mutta kuten aivan oikein arvasitte on olemassa rauhansopimus. Se on allekirjoitettu vuonna 1876 Mambesin olles vielä brittiläinen siirtomaa ja Galungan kuuluessa Ranskalle. Rauhansopimuksessa määriteltiin oli Mambesin ulottuvan etelässä Lunga-joelle saakka. Tosiasia on että koko alue oli siihen aikaan täysin tutkimatonta seutua, jossa joki oli ainoa kaikkien palefacejen tuntema maamerkki. Vuorille ei kukaan länkkäri ollut kiivennyt eikä alueesta muutenkaan tiedetty juuri mitään. Savunaamoilta ei toki kysytty. Käytännön galungalaiset tunsivat voivansa ylittää joen aivan vapaasti ja laiduntaa karjaansa rajan toisella puolella jos halusivat - kun taas yxikään britti ei koskaan vaivautunut vuoriston ylize. Silti vittu britit sanoivat nyppien whiskereitään. Sopimus on sopimus, ainakin jos se on meidän eduxi.
    ellauri283.html on line 479: Burkina Fason varhaista historiaa tunnetaan vain paloittain, ja varhaiset todisteet ovat lähinnä kivikirveitä. Lobien ja bonobojen esivanhemmat olivat varhaisimpia maanviljelijöitä. Korjaan bobojen. Bobo oli 1 Hukkataipaleiden kultaisista noutajista. Kyllä nuo tytöt kexii kexeliäitä koiran nimiä!
    ellauri284.html on line 40: This snapshot, our correspondent states, was taken after The German - sorry - the French charge near Forêt-Champignon. The body stretched at full length is a dead German guy. Those crouching behind a stone are French infantrymen, stone dead as well. Evidently the were charging, carrying that big stone. The bodies were not moved so as not to confuse the crime scene investigation.
    ellauri284.html on line 47: Niin sotakin. WW1 piti olla sota joka lopettaa kaikki sodat. WW2 alkoi 1 sukupolvi myöhemmin. Sen jälkeen ydinpelotteen piti lopettaa kaikki sodat. Neuvostoliiton lyttäyxen piti olla end of history. Nyt on WW3 huulilla siitä huolimatta, 3 sukupolvea myöhemmin. Britit aikoo kasvattaa ydinarsenaalia.
    ellauri284.html on line 49: Sniff. Nyyh. Abban Dancing Queen oli ihana. Nyt jossei historia lopu se suop jatkua.
    ellauri284.html on line 135: An irresistible destiny to accomplish this essential duty
    ellauri284.html on line 144: Britannian johtajat ovat aina välttäneet pyytämästä anteeksi Jallianwala Baghissa, muurien aidatussa puutarhassa Pohjois-Intian Amritsarin kaupungissa tapahtuneesta verenvuodatuksesta, jossa satoja rauhanomaisesti siirtomaavaltaa protestoivia ihmisiä ammuttiin kuoliaaksi brittikenraalin käskystä. Sillä ei se ollut mikään vahinko, vaan tuskallinen välttämättömyys.
    ellauri284.html on line 167: Ystävällisen tulipalon jälkeen symbolisille brittijoukoille annettiin japanilaiset sadetakit, jotta japanilaiset tunnistaisivat ne helpommin. Kun Saxan tykistöltä loppuivat ammukset 6. marraskuuta, antautuminen oli väistämätöntä. Lentäjä-ässä ltn Plüschow väitti pudottaneensa pistoolilla japanilaisen Farman MF.VII, mikä oli ensimmäinen emävale sotilasilmailun historiassa. Paljon muita seurasi.
    ellauri284.html on line 181: Puola on miehitetty enemmän kertoja kuin kukaan muistaa. Joskus se on länkkäreistä hyvä asia, joskus paha. Venäläisten joukkojen tulo pieneen puolalaiseen kaupunkiin 1914 sai britit niin iloisixi että pk-miehet lohkaisivat siitä tsoukin: "Valokuvamme esittää venäläisen miehitysvoiman erään etujoukon erään puolalaisen kaupungin pääkadulla. Huomaattehan että 1 sotilaista kantaa valkoista ankkaa, joka protestoi voimakkaasti. Mahdollisesti ankka oli puolalainen sotavanki, ei rykmentin maskotti." HAHA. Seuraavaxi venäläiset miehittivät Puolan Saxan kanssa sovussa 1939. Joku zoukki näyttää siinäkin miehittäjiä naurattavan. Ehkä venäläinen kertoo sakulle viime sodan sotavankiankkakaskun. Sitten venäläiset vielä vapauttivat Puolan Saxan miehityxestä 1945. Lopullinen sopu minkä palan kukin saa tehtiin sitten Jaltan konferenssissa (kz. albumia 65). Tai lopullinen ja lopullinen, ehkä Puolan historia ei ole vielä ihan tapissa...
    ellauri284.html on line 194: This unhappy French soldier was bribed by the Germans, for a measly hundred francs, to signal to them the position of the French guns near Rheims Thus he sold the lives of his comrades, so to speak, for thirty pieces of (German) silver." He paid the penalty for his treachery with his life but was it not a greater crime to tempt him? 100 francs is nowhere near 30 pieces of German silver.
    ellauri284.html on line 209: General Beyers perished a traitor-in-arms, drowned in the Vaal, while hotly pursued and trying to cross the flooded river with some of his men. They were fired on, and Beyers fell from his horse but caught hold of the tail of another, but was soon seen in difficulties and calling for help. Before the fighting was over, General Beyers had diappeared under water. No one came to help.
    ellauri284.html on line 222: Huolimatta alustavista huolista, että komedia saattaisi vähätellä sodan arvoa, se sai kiitosta ja voitti British Academy Television Award -palkinnon parhaasta komediasarjasta vuonna 1989. Vuonna 2000 se sijoittui alan ammattilaisten toimesta 16. sijalle 100 suurimman brittiläisen televisio-ohjelman listalla. koonnut British Film Institute. Jotkut historioitsijat ja poliitikot ovat kuitenkin kritisoineet sitä liian kriittisen näkemyksen esittämisestä sodasta, mikä vahvistaa yleistä käsitystä "aasien johtamista leijonoista".The Witchin Falklandin sota 1982 oli jymymenestys, mutta Blairin Irakin invaasiosota 2003 emämunaus. Paha siltä pohjalta on vinoilla Ukrainan demilitarisaatiosta. Tai eihän se mitään estä, historia toistaa izeään. Voittoisat sodat on oikeutettuja, tappiot kansanmurhia..
    ellauri284.html on line 241: Kenttämarsalkka Douglas Haigiin, jonka käskyjen väitetään johtaneen satoihin tuhansiin brittiläisiin kuolemiin Passchendaelen ja Sommen taisteluissa, viitataan jatkuvasti. Blackadder itse kuvailee Haigin etenemisyrityksiä vain "toiseksi jättimäiseksi yritykseksi siirtää juomakaappinsa kuusi tuumaa lähemmäs Berliiniä" ja Melchettiltä kysyttäessä ehdotuksia joukkojen moraalin parantamiseksi, ehdottaa nauraen Haigin eroa tai itsemurhaa. "Goodbyeee" -elokuvassa kohtaus parodioi Haigin ammatillisia kykyjä kuvaamalla marsalkkaa leikkimässä lelusotilaiden kanssa, jonka hän lakaisee välinpitämättömästi haudosta toiseen ja sitten roskakoriin kuunnellessaan Blackadderin vetoomusta päästä puhumaan suureen puhelimeen. Sommen sotilaspalvelijoista ja rivimiehistä Tolkien tiivisti Sam Gamgin, Frodon uskollisen ja kätevän kumppanin.
    ellauri284.html on line 243: Sarja muistelee useita todellisia historiallisia sodan tapahtumia, kuten joulutauon vuonna 1914. Blackadder muistelee tapahtumaa: "Molemmat osapuolet etenivät yhden joulupisun aikana pidemmälle kuin kahden ja puolen seuraavan sodan vuoden aikana." Viitataan myös aikakauden populaarikulttuuriin sekä aiempaan sarjaan. Jaksossa "Private Plane" nähdään Lord Flashheartin ja Bobin hahmojen paluu toisesta sarjan "Bells" -jaksosta sekä myös saksalaisen lentävä ässä, Baron von Richthofen. Kolmannen jakson "Major Star" juonen lanka sisältää Blackadderin vastenmielisyyden mykkäelokuvatähteen Charlie Chapliniin, jota hän pitää "yhtä hauskana kuin saada nuoli kaulan läpi ja sitten huomata, että siihen on sidottu bensalasku". Totta Mooses Rowan, Charlie on täysin huumoriton kaatuilija. Toinen viittaus viitattiin Sudaniin, jonka sodan veteraani Blackadder oli. Toisin kuin brittien messinki, Blackadder näkee brittien liiallisen itseluottamuksen läpi: aikaisemmat voitot jotka tukahduttivat siirtomaakapinat olivat valmistautumista suureen siirtomaasotaan.
    ellauri284.html on line 249: Tämän sarjan viimeinen jakso, "Goodbyeee", vaikka olikin uskollinen sarjan tavanomaiselle komediatyylille useimmissa edellisissä kohtauksissa, sisälsi ei-komedisen loppukohtauksen, jossa päähenkilöt (paitsi kenraali Melchett) lähetetään lopulta tuleen. Darling säilyttää jonkin verran toivoa sanoen, että tämä saattaa olla viimeinen taistelu ja historia kirjoitetaan nimellä "Suuri sota, 1914-1917". Huolimatta Baldrikin väitteestä, että hänellä on viimeinen ovela suunnitelma pelastaa heidät uhkaavalta tuomiolta, Blackadder toimittaa viimeisen rivin:
    ellauri284.html on line 314: Ensimmäisessä, 7,5 tuntia kestävässä oikeudenkäynnissä kielenkäyttö on värikästä. Erkkilä ja toinen merkkien myyntimiehistä, oululainen liikkeenharjoittaja, myöntävät suunnitelleensa ja saaneensa alulle koko homman, mutta sanovat tulleensa lahtelaisen kirjapainoalan ammattilaisen huijaamaksi.
    ellauri284.html on line 339: Siinä missä Erkkilä nousi 1990-luvulla yhdeksi Suomen rikoshistorian tunnetuimmista hahmoista, on Raimo Majuri alias Ram Laor toiminut uskonnollisten suomalaisten ryhmien oppaana Israelissa. Laorin nimi on näkynyt niin Toiviomatkojen kuin Herättäjä-Yhdistyksenkin järjestämien Israelin-matkojen mainoksissa.
    ellauri284.html on line 351: Että tälläinen historiikki Iltalehdessä joulupäivänä!
    ellauri284.html on line 424: Hän palasi lännen tyylilajiin ohjatessaan ja näytelleessään elokuvassa Pale Rider (1985), joka perustuu klassiseen westerniin Shane (1953) ja seuraa Sierran sumuista laskeutuvaa saarnaajaa kaivostyöläisten puolelle. Kalifornian kultakuume 1850. Otsikko on viittaus The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, koska vaalean hevosen ratsastaja on Death, ja osoittaa yhtäläisyyksiä Eastwoodin läntisen High Plains Drifteriin (1973) moraalin ja oikeudenmukaisuuden teemoiltaan sekä yliluonnollisen tutkimisen osalta. Sitä ylistettiin yhdeksi vuoden 1985 parhaista elokuvista ja parhaaksi westerniksi, joka on nähty huomattavan pitkään. Tämä vuosi (1985) jää elokuvahistoriaan hetkenä, jolloin Clint Eastwood ansaitsi vihdoin kunnioituksen taiteilijana ja Matti Pulkkinen menetti sen teoxella Romaanihenkilön kuolema. Samana vuonna Ram Laor palasi kotiin Kaliforniasta ja uran alamäki alkoi Vuorikadun printterihuoneessa.
    ellauri284.html on line 432: Life -lehden mukaan "Eastwoodin tyyli on ampua ensin ja toimia vasta sen jälkeen. Hän syövyttää hahmonsa käytännössä ilman sanoja. Hän on kehittänyt alipelaamisen taidon siihen pisteeseen, että kuka tahansa hänen ympärillään, joka niin paljon kuin hätkähtää, näyttää hassulta histrioniselta."
    ellauri284.html on line 473: Taas tuli halkiohaara! Scott taitaa olla Clintin Imi. Sekin näyttelijä tietysti. Eastwood on ollut terveys- ja kuntofanaatikko teini-iästä lähtien. Ei siinä kauan nokka tuhise kun Clint saa kamat pussiin. Vähemmällä kiireellä olisi voinut tulla lisää poikia.
    ellauri284.html on line 522: Vastauksena tapaukseen Delhissä toimiva merkittävä lasten oikeuksien ryhmä Haq: Center for Child Rights kertoi CNN:lle lausunnossaan, että se tuomitsee "kaikenlaisen lastenkielen hyväksikäytön". Se lisäsi: "Jotkut uutiset viittaavat tiibetiläiseen kulttuuriin kielen näyttämisestä, mutta tämä video ei todellakaan koske mitään kulttuuri-ilmaisua, ja vaikka olisikin, tällaiset kulttuuri-ilmaisut eivät ole hyväksyttäviä."
    ellauri284.html on line 525: "Tunteiden ja tapojen ilmaisu on nykyään sulanut yhteen ja muuttunut elävästi länsimaiseksi", maanpaossa oleva tiibetiläinen aktivisti Namdol Lhagyari kirjoitti Twitterissä. "Muista kulttuureista, tavoista ja sosiaalisista vaikutuksista sukupuoleen ja seksuaalisuuteen liittyvän kertomuksen tuominen mukaan tiibetiläisen ilmaisun tulkitsemiseen on kauhistuttavaa."
    ellauri284.html on line 540: Dali Laaman toimisto pyysi anteeksi M3M:ltä. Mikäs se sitten on? M3M India Limited aloitti toimintansa vuonna 2011. Sillä on projekteja muun muassa Nagpurissa, Bengalurussa, Chennaissa, Kochissa ja Amritsarissa. M3M-konsernilla on noin 2 000 hehtaarin maapankki pääkaupunkiseudulla. Se kehittää 16 hanketta, joista noin 10 on asuinhankkeita. Se on Trumpin liikekumppani Intiassa ja yhteistyössä ruotsalaisen konsultti-insinöörin Swecon kanssa kehittääkseen Intian ensimmäisen ilmastoneutraalin älykaupungin Gurgaoniin. "Intian 100 rikkaimman kiinteistöpäämiehen joukosta 75 asuu Mumbaissa, New Delhissä ja Bengalurussa".
    ellauri284.html on line 587: Tämä on m3m-tarina, joka kuuluu Pankaj Bansalille. Vaikka se on suhteellisen uusi, mutta se on saavuttanut suuren menestyksen vain kaksi vuotta sen julkaisusta. M3M on tehnyt Intian markkinat erittäin tyytyväisiksi kaikenlaisilla uusilla ominaisuuksilla ja erityisesti laadukkailla tuotteillaan. M3m-yrityksen erottaa muista yrityksistä se, että he ajattelevat aina ensin asiakkaitaan, sillä he tietävät, että asiakastyytyväisyys on erittäin tärkeää liiketoiminnan kasvulle. Pankaj Bansal on onnistunut viemään yrityksensä nimen korkealle kaikkialla lyhyessä ajassa. Itse asiassa vielä nyt kahden vuoden jälkeen hän ei tee kompromisseja laadustaan ​​ja hyvistä palveluistaan. Hän sanoo, että "tyytyväinen asiakas tulee uudestaan ​​ja ostaa sinulle tuotteen/palvelut". Voimme nähdä tämän asian m3m:n historiassa. Hyvin lyhyessä ajassa he ovat saaneet monia tyytyväisiä asiakkaita ja sen seurauksena rikastuneet aivan sikana.
    ellauri284.html on line 589: M3M Intian perustivat vuoden 2005 alussa Basant ja Roope Bansal, jotka halusivat aloittaa kiinteistöliiketoiminnan. Yrityksen intohimo ja omistautuminen tulivat sen perustaksi, ja pian tie huippuosaamiseen alkoi. Pankaj Bansal on yhdysvaltalainen johtava yrittäjä, joka perusti M3M Indian, yhden Intian tunnetuimmista ja nopeimmin kasvavista kiinteistökehittäjistä. Hän on valmistunut Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studiesista Mumbaissa ja Harvard Business Schoolin Executive Management Programista Yhdysvalloissa. Tunnetut Trump Towers Delhissä NCR ja Golf Estate Gurgaonissa ovat vain pari esimerkkiä Gurugramin ylpeydestä. Pankaj Bansal, nuori yrittäjä, joka on vielä 40-vuotias, on täsmälleen 34-vuotias. M3M Golfin kiinteistökehitys, joka sisältää yli 50 hehtaarin huippuylellisen lomakeskuksen kaltaisen asuinkompleksin, on huippusaavutus. M3M Golf Estate on voittanut joukon arvostettuja palkintoja yhdeksi Intian parhaista luksusprojekteista ja ulkomailla.
    ellauri284.html on line 595: Tää juonihan on suoraan kanadalaissarjasta The Indian Detective. It is a Canadian crime comedy-drama series which debuted on CTV and Netflix in 2017. The show stars Russell Peters as Doug D'Mello, a police officer from Toronto who becomes embroiled in a murder investigation while visiting his father (Anupam Kher) in Mumbai during a one-month suspension for incompetence. The fourth episode ended in a cliffhanger, hinting at a possible second season; while Peters has stated at various times that a second season was in the works, none has been officially announced as of September 2019. A relatively new show, Season 1 of ‘The Indian Detective’, consisting of four episodes, premiered on November 23, 2017, and it received mixed reviews from television critics and audiences alike. The show has no chance of being renewed for a second season.
    ellauri284.html on line 599: A man stands in front of a small, ramshackle store near the apartment blocks of Gurgaon, India, where a firm is building a Trump-branded tower. The agreement gives the Trump Organization a portion of its office rentals. (Enrico Fabian/for The Washington Post). GURGAON, India — The Trump Organization is about to double its real estate empire in India with two new projects in this suburb of New Delhi known for rapacious development and poor planning.
    ellauri284.html on line 602: On Monday, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be at the White House to meet with President Trump. It will be exactly the sort of moment that makes ethics experts, worried about the conflation of Trump’s business abroad with his oversight of U.S. foreign policy, especially alarmed.
    ellauri284.html on line 605: “Everything is compromised,” said Sanjay Sharma, a Gurgaon real estate broker. “It’s not some people in some places who are corrupt. Corruption is institutionalized. To thrive in this real estate market, you must be a scoundrel. It is impossible for a thorough gentleman to survive here.”
    ellauri284.html on line 606: A food vendor pushes his cart on a dusty stretch of road in Gurgaon. (Enrico Fabian/for The Washington Post)
    ellauri284.html on line 609: After Saxena applied for a land-use change back in 2005, Dinesh Dayma, an agent acting on behalf of IREO, persuaded him to sell his land before the government acquired it by eminent domain, according to Saxena. Panicked, Saxena sold about a third of it for $188,000. The developers packaged it with other parcels, similarly acquired, and now are making it available for the Trump project.
    ellauri284.html on line 619: Though the Trump Organization has declined to comment for this article, Alan Garten, the company’s general counsel, addressed questions earlier this year about some of the company’s other unorthodox business partners. He said that blemishes on their records are not “reflective of the portfolio as a whole” and that the organization conducts “due diligence” background checks.
    ellauri284.html on line 621: Ethics experts say engaging partners who have ongoing legal issues underscores the growing concern that the president’s business projects around the world could create conflicts of interest or other challenges for his administration.
    ellauri284.html on line 623: “By continuing his association with these groups and pursuing his private business interests, he’s put himself on a collision course with the U.S. public interest,” said Kathleen Clark, a law professor and ethics expert at Washington University in St. Louis. “It’s a terrible idea.”
    ellauri284.html on line 624: A convoluted trail of funds Lalit Goyal, managing director of IREO, said his firm has a licensing agreement for the Trump name and other considerations for the office tower it is building. (Enrico Fabian/for The Washington Post)
    ellauri284.html on line 627: Goyal said that his company is a private-equity fund founded in 2004 by a former Goldman Sachs executive and Indian partners to infuse foreign capital into India’s real estate market. The company counts high-profile sovereign wealth and university endowment funds among its backers.
    ellauri284.html on line 631: The Enforcement Directorate is examining whether a number of shell companies were set up to mask the origins of this money, as it is illegal for foreign investors to purchase agricultural land in India, according to investigators, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the inquiry is ongoing.
    ellauri284.html on line 638: The Bansal brothers, Basant and Roop — sons of a mustard-seed-oil seller from a small village nearby — made their fortune buying up adjoining plots of land for bigger developers. As they built M3M India, which stands for “Magnificence in the Trinity of Men, Materials and Money,” they became adept at sweet-talking villagers over a hookah pipe, locals said. The Bansals, who declined to comment for this article, helped IREO put together the land for the Trump project.
    ellauri284.html on line 641: A man preps his tanker for filling at a sewage-treatment plant. Less than half of Gurgaon residents have sewer access. (Enrico Fabian/for The Washington Post)
    ellauri284.html on line 643: Dinesh Dayma, a land agent for the Bansals, persuaded the surgeon to sell his land to the developer rather than risk having his land appropriated by the government at below-market rates. Dayma works out of an office in a low-slung concrete building not far from luxury hotels and a Porsche dealership. It sits snugly inside the walled office compound of his brother, Mahesh, a local politician from the BJP. A saffron-and-green banner with the politician’s photo — common in India — hangs prominently outside the property office.
    ellauri284.html on line 645: Inside, Dayma sat in his darkened office — the electricity was out — and denied that he had used his brother’s position to glean information about the doctor’s land. He came by the information fairly, he said.
    ellauri284.html on line 648: “The state and the developers work together,” Dayma said, encouraging rumors to rush farmers into selling. “In all of the sectors, all of the land was acquired this way,” he said.
    ellauri284.html on line 649: One state official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of jeopardizing his employment, recalled the heady days of growth when developers routinely showed up at the home of a former chief minister in sport-utility vehicles laden with suitcases full of cash.
    ellauri284.html on line 654: On a blindingly sunny day in Gurgaon, Pankaj Bansal, son of Basant Bansal, appeared on a golf green to greet contestants from the “Apprentice”-style Indian reality show “The Pitch.” The young scion, in a lilac shirt and aviator sunglasses, told the budding entrepreneurs that his family was positioning itself to be “one of the most respected developers in the country” and worked only with the best architects, interior designers and landscapers.
    ellauri284.html on line 657: Basant Bansal caught the attention of tax investigators twice, records show, once in 2008 and again in 2011, when he threw a lavish wedding for his daughter in Turkey, according to a report in the Hindustan Times. Investigators seized cash worth $48 million in a raid on the company’s offices. A tax investigator said that Bansal ultimately paid the taxes he owed.
    ellauri284.html on line 668: Speaking generally, Wrage said that an Indian citizen bribing an Indian official does not violate the U.S. act but does indicate “shoddy business ethics and a willingness to violate the law. This is the clearest sort of red flag. If a company will bribe in one situation, you’re on notice that they’re likely to bribe again.”
    ellauri284.html on line 702: Tällä Robertsilla oli kaksi poikaa, jotka molemmat saivat korkeimmat arvosanat Britannian armeijassa. Yksi poika ja pojanpoika voittivat Victoria Crossin, joka on korkein kunnianosoitus urheudesta kahden jalan pituisen ruohonkorrella aseistetun vihollisen edessä Britannian armeijassa. Äijä eli 89-vuotiaaxi Irlannin tiluxilla ennenkuin vilustui. Molemmilla oli Bunyipin sedän whiskerit ja jaarlilla vielä keisari Wilhelm wiixet.
    ellauri284.html on line 726: Luutnantti Robertsin urheus on kaikissa tilanteissa ollut merkittävintä. Seuratessaan vetäytyvää vihollista 2. tammikuuta 1858 Khodagungessa hän näki kaukaa kahden Sepoyn lähtevän vapaalipulla. Luutnantti Roberts laittoi kannuja hevoselleen ja ohitti heidät juuri heidän ollessaan tulossa kylään. He kääntyivät välittömästi ympäri ja esittivät muskettinsa hänelle, ja yksi miehistä painoi vahingossa liipaisinta, mutta onneksi hatut katkesivat ja tämä urhoollinen nuori upseeri katkaisi lipunkantajan ja hän otti lipun haltuunsa. Hän myös katkaisi samana päivänä toisen Sepoyn, joka seisoi loitolla musketilla ja pistimellä pitäen loitolla Sowaria. Luutnantti Roberts ratsasti ratsumiehen avuksi ja ryntäsi Sepoylle yhdellä miekkaiskulla häntä kasvoihin ja tappoi hänet paikalla.
    ellauri285.html on line 70: Consider, for example, the horse. We live across from a horse breeding establishment so I’ve had ample opportunity to observe these estimable animals in action. While they shit copiously they never get any on their hair (when was the last time you saw a horse’s behind fouled by its own waste?). The reason for this lies in the design of the horse anus. It is an extensible device that, when a BM is about to pass, protrudes a few critical inches, allowing the manure to drop straight to the ground without mussing a single hair. To further forfend fouling, there is no hair in the immediate vicinity of the horse’s anus, nor on the extensible process itself. What a remarkable design.
    ellauri285.html on line 74: To accommodate our flawed design, we are taught from birth to use wads of paper, magazine pages, dried corncobs and even stones, to wipe our filthy behinds. And this we must do! If we did not wipe, we would reek of dung from the cake of dingleberries between our cheeks and our pants, skirts, caftans and burkas, would be fouled with nicotine stains and clouds of flies would follow us down the street like goslings.
    ellauri285.html on line 84: A bear and a rabbit were next to each other taking a shit. Since they aren’t natural enemies there was no conflict. The bear says to the rabbit, “Say, do you have trouble with shit sticking to your fur?” The rabbit said, “No, not really.” So the bear wiped his ass with the rabbit.
    ellauri285.html on line 102: Pulkkinen on sisällyttänyt antiromaaniinsa kirjoittamishetkellä ajankohtaisia teemoja, kuten Puolan sotatilan, Suomen idänpolitiikan arvostelun, Afrikka-kokemuksensa ja kehitysyhteistyökritiikin, omaa henkilöhistoriaansa, omat todelliset ja fiktiiviset kirjansa, lukemattomat lainaukset mm. sosiaalipsykologisesta kirjallisuudesta.
    ellauri285.html on line 143: The Michigan Relics (also known as the Scotford Frauds or Soper Frauds) are a series of alleged ancient artifacts that were "discovered" during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. They were presented by some to be evidence that people of an ancient Near Eastern culture had lived in North America and the U.S. state of Michigan, which, is known as pre-Columbian contact. Many scholars have determined that the artifacts are archaeological forgeries. The Michigan Relics are considered to be one of the most elaborate and extensive pseudoarchaeological hoaxes ever perpetrated in American history.
    ellauri285.html on line 145: The objects included coins, pipes, boxes, figurines and cuneiform tablets that depicted various biblical scenes, including Moses handing out the tablets of the Ten Commandments. On November 14, 1907, the Detroit News reported that Soper and Scotford were selling copper crowns they had supposedly found on heads of prehistoric kings, and copies of Noah's diary.
    ellauri285.html on line 154: Rudolph Etzenhouser, who was a traveling elder of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (RLDS), saw the relics as proof of the historicity of the Book of Mormon. Etzenhouser even published a book on his collection of the Michigan Relics.
    ellauri285.html on line 163: Mixei julkaista juttuja jotka on täynnä todellisia murhia, kuten mestauksia, katkaistuja sukupuolielimiä ja muita tulehduksellisia herkkuja? Miksi torjua kirjallisia tekstejä, jotka kuvaavat arabeja hyökkäämässä huutaen "Palestiina – maamme; juutalaiset – meidän koiramme!” ja sallia juutalaisten lasten lukea historiallisia tekstejä, jotka kuvaavat arabeja hyökkäävän huutaen – sillä juuri tätä he todella huusivat – ”Kuolema juutalaisille! ”?
    ellauri285.html on line 167: Tämä inversion käyttö (joka on valmistettu arabien käyttöön, yhtä varmasti kuin heidän aseensa ovat olleet Neuvostoliitosta) on todella "palestiinalaisten historian etsimistä".
    ellauri285.html on line 262: Timo Airaxisen seuraaja joensuulainen Antti Kauppinen on kynäillyt luvun Meaningfulness kirjaan Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Well-Being. Abstract: This paper is an overview of contemporary theories of meaning of life and its relation to well-being.
    ellauri285.html on line 406: Konrad Zacharias Lorenz (* 7. November 1903 in Wien; † 27. Februar 1989 ebenda) war ein österreichischer Zoologe, Medizin-Nobelpreisträger und einer der Hauptvertreter der klassischen vergleichenden Verhaltensforschung (Ethologie). Er selbst nannte dieses Forschungsgebiet bis 1949 „Tierpsychologie“. Lorenz wird im deutschsprachigen Raum als deren Gründervater angesehen. Er war Mitarbeiter des Rassenpolitischen Amtes der NSDAP und Direktor des Max-Planck-Instituts für Verhaltensphysiologie. Er war ein Kindheitsfreund Karl Poppers. Lorenzin nazimielisyydesytä ja arjalaisuudesta nousseet epäilyxet hälvenivät: dieser habe „aus seiner Zustimmung zum Nationalsozialismus niemals ein Hehl gemacht. Auch seine arische Abstammung ist in Ordnung.“
    ellauri285.html on line 445: Paasilinnan erityisesti suosimia tyylilajeja olivat satiiri, essee ja aforistiikka, mutta häneltä ilmestyi myös matkakirjoja, romaani, omaelämäkerta, novelleja sekä historiallisia teoksia. Hänen tuotantoaan on käännetty ainakin 13 kielelle.
    ellauri285.html on line 581: Tšernobylin lähellä Ukrainassa V.I. Lenin -ydinvoimalan reaktorissa syttyi grafiittitulipalo, joka aiheutti historian vakavimman ydinonnettomuuden. 31 ihmistä kuoli heti, ja suuria määriä radioaktiivisuutta pääsi ympäristöön. Eläimet kiittivät.
    ellauri285.html on line 623: Maxin Israelin historiaa koskevasta jouzenlaulusta nousee esiin nippu viime vuosisadan lopun b-kirkkausluokan tähtiä.
    ellauri285.html on line 633: Ralph Schoenman (born 1935) is an American left-wing activist who was a personal secretary to Bertrand Russell and became general secretary of the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation. He was involved in a number of projects supported by Russell, including the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), the Committee of 100 and an unofficial war crimes tribunal to try American leaders for their conduct in the Vietnam War. Shortly before his death in 1970, Russell publicly broke with Schoenman. Sen jälkeen Schoenman (jutku kylläkin) kirjoitti tämän vahvasti anti-sionistisen läpyskän:
    ellauri285.html on line 639: No portions of this book may be reprinted, reposted or published without written permission from the author.
    ellauri285.html on line 648: Radio Yerevan answered: "No. The Jew who wrote the answers left for Israel."[This quote needs a citation]
    ellauri285.html on line 651: Bernard Levin wrote critically of Schoenman's influence on Russell, saying that Schoenman was partly responsible for Russell's virulent anti-Americanism, in contrast to his earlier pronouncements against communism. Russell said of Schoenman, "You know he is a rather rash young man, and I have to restrain him."
    ellauri285.html on line 656: During the course of the tribunal, the U.S. government revoked Schoenman's passport because of unauthorized visits to North Vietnam. In November 1967, he was deported back to the U.S. by Bolivian authorities when he traveled there to attend the trial of Régis Debray. As a result, he was prevented from attending the tribunal's proceedings in Copenhagen later that month because Danish authorities refused to allow him to enter without a passport. This led to a sequence in which Schoenman shuttled between several European countries, none of which would admit him, before illegally entering Britain, where he remained for 10 days until being deported in June 1968.
    ellauri285.html on line 658: In December 1969, Russell made a public statement in that he had no contact with Schoenman and was unaware of his activities. Russell approved a vote to remove Schoenman from the board of the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation.
    ellauri285.html on line 684: "La médiologie s´intéresse à tous les moyens, à tous les véhicules par lesquels nous avons accès, à l´histoire, au sens. Ça n´a rien à voir avec les médias de masse dont je ne connais rien."
    ellauri285.html on line 710: Régis Debray affirme que quand s’épuise le sens du symbolique reviennent les autorités religieuses. Plus la puissance symbolique est dématérialisée (la religion), plus l’ordre symbolique est fort et plus la puissance symbolique est historicisée (personnages), plus l’ordre symbolique est fragile. Une humanité sans croyance est donc, selon lui, réduite à l’animalité.
    ellauri285.html on line 751: Alan David Sokal (/ˈsoʊkəl/; born January 24, 1955) is an American professor of mathematics at University College London and professor emeritus of physics at New York University. He works in statistical mechanics and combinatorics. He is a critic of postmodernism, and caused the Sokal affair in 1996 when his deliberately nonsensical paper was published by Duke University Press´s Social Text. He also co-authored a paper criticizing the critical positivity ratio concept in positive psychology.
    ellauri285.html on line 753: The critical positivity ratio (also known as the "Losada ratio" or the "Losada line" [not verified in body]) is a largely discredited concept in positive psychology positing an exact ratio of positive to negative emotions which distinguishes "flourishing" people from "languishing" people.[citation needed] The ratio was proposed by psychologists Barbara Fredrickson and Marcial Losada, who believed that they had identified an experimental measure of affect whose model-derived positive-to-negative ratio of 2.9013 defined a critical separation between flourishing and languishing individuals, as reported in their 2005 paper in American Psychologist.[non-primary source needed] This concept of a critical positivity ratio was widely embraced by academic psychologists and the lay public; Fredrickson and Losada´s paper had been cited more than 320 times by January 2014, and Fredrickson wrote a popular book expounding the concept of "the 3-to-1 ratio that will change your life". In it she wrote, "just as zero degrees Celsius is a special number in thermodynamics, the 3-to-1 positivity ratio may well be a magic number in human psychology."
    ellauri285.html on line 759: Fredrickson wrote a response in which she conceded that the mathematical aspects of the critical positivity ratio were "questionable" and that she had "neither the expertise nor the insight" to defend them, but she maintained that the empirical evidence for the existence of a critical positivity ratio was solid. Brown, Sokal, and Friedman, the rebuttal authors, published their response to Fredrickson´s "Update" the next year, maintaining that there was no evidence for a critical positivity ratio. Losada declined to respond to the criticism (indicating to the Chronicle of Higher Education that he was too busy running his consulting business).[verification needed] Hämäläinen and colleagues responded later, passing over the Brown-Sokal-Friedman rebuttal claim of failed criteria for use of differential equations in modeling, instead arguing that there were no fundamental errors in the mathematics itself, only problems related to the model´s justification and interpretation.
    ellauri285.html on line 763: Building on research by Barbara Fredrickson suggesting that individuals with a higher ratio of positive to negative emotions tend to have more successful life outcomes, and on studies by Marcial Losada applying differential equations from fluid dynamics to human emotions,[citation needed] Fredrickson and Losada proposed as informative a ratio of positive to negative affect derived from nonlinear dynamics modelling (based on Lorenz systems), which appeared in 2005 in a paper in American Psychologist. The derived combination of expressions and default parameters led them to conclude that a critical ratio of positive to negative affect of exactly 2.9013 separated flourishing from languishing individuals, and to argue that the ideal positivity/negativity ratio lies between 2.9013 and an upper limit ratio of 11.6346. Hence, they claimed that their model predicted cut-off points for the minimum and maximum positivity ratios within which one should observe qualitative changes in an individual´s level of flourishing, specifically, that those within this range of ratios would "flourish", and those outside would "languish".[non-primary source needed] As of January 2014, the 2005 Fredrickson and Losada´s paper had been cited more than 320 times in the psychology literature.
    ellauri285.html on line 768: differential equations used by Losada to calculate the critical positivity ratio use parameters taken directly from Lorenz´s simplified, illustrative, and arbitrary models for fluid dynamics, with Losada giving no rationale for his choice of parameters;
    ellauri285.html on line 779: The original rebuttal authors conclude this salvo by lamenting that the "unbridled romanticism" of which humanist psychology has been accused has not been replaced with a rigorous evidence-based psychology—as Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi promised in their founding manifesto of positive psychology—rather, the widespread acceptance of the critical positivity ratio shows that positive psychology has betrayed this promise, stating that "the sin is now romantic scientism rather than pure romanticism is not, in our view, a great advance."
    ellauri285.html on line 786: Marcial Losada (1939–2020) was a Chilean psychologist, consultant, and former director of the Center for Advanced Research (CFAR) in Ann Arbor, Michigan.[not verified in body] He is known for his work in academia and business focusing on the development of "high performance teams",[This quote needs a citation] and having participated in partially retracted collaborative work with Barbara Fredrickson of the University of North Carolina, a retraction for which he has been assigned the culpability.
    ellauri285.html on line 788: Marcial Francisco Losada was born in 1939 in Chile.[citation needed] He received a Ph.D. in organizational psychology from the University of Michigan. After finishing his doctoral work, Losada served as a Center for Advanced Research (CFAR) in Ann Arbor, Michigan.[when?][citation needed] In his career, Losada developed a nonlinear dynamics model, the meta learning model, to show dynamical patterns achieved by high, medium and low performing teams, where performance was evaluated based on profitability, customer satisfaction, and 360-degree feedback.[citation needed]. In pursuing these goals, he founded and served as executive director of Losada Line Consulting, which had presented past workshops and seminars at companies including Apple, Boeing, EDS, GM, and Merck, and foundations including the Kellogg and Mellon Foundations, with high performance team-building contracts at BCI, Banchile, BHP-Billiton, Codelco, and Telefónica [better source needed].
    ellauri286.html on line 86: SOFI OKSASEN (s. 1977) kulttikirjaksi muodostunut feministinen esikoisteos kipeistä aiheista, syömishäiriöstä, virolaisnaisten asemasta ja ryssävihasta. Stalinin lehmät tarkastelee ankarasti Viron lähihistoriaa sekä virolaisäidin ja suomalaisisän tytärtä henkisessä puristuksessa.
    ellauri286.html on line 93: Sofi Oksanen piti puheensa tänään Lillehammerissa. Sofi Oksanen piti puheensa tänään Lillehammerissa. Elettiin vuotta 2016, SSS-hallituxen aikoja. Vihreiden silloinen puheenjohtaja Ville Niinistö luonnehti ryhmäpuheenvuorossaan hallitusohjelmaa poikkeuksellisen oikeistolaiseksi: "Hallitusohjelmaansa esittelevä hallitus on perusoikeistolainen hallitus. Sitä on myös luonnehdittu ohjelmaltaan republikaaniseksi. Ensimmäistä kertaa Suomen historiassa meillä on hallitus, joka tietoisesti haluaa supistaa julkisen vallan vastuuta ihmisistä." Vasemmistoliiton silloinen puheenjohtaja Paavo Arhinmäki painotti ryhmäpuheenvuorossaan hallituksen poikkeamista vaalilupauksistaan: "Valtiovarainministeriön omienkin laskelmien mukaan eläkeläisiin, lapsiperheisiin ja työttömiin kohdistuu eniten leikkauksia hallitusohjelmassa. Jos hallitusohjelmaa käsiteltäisiin käräjäoikeudessa, olisi rikosnimike todennäköisesti törkeä petos."
    ellauri286.html on line 99: Julkaisin vuonna 2003 Suomessa esikoisromaanini, Viron lähihistoriaa käsittelevän Stalinin lehmät. Törmäsin toimittajiin, jotka kutsuivat kirjaani “neuvostovastaiseksi”, suomettuneen Suomen perussanastoon kuuluvalla, aikoinaan hyvinkin negatiivisella määreellä.
    ellauri286.html on line 103: Se, että Viron miehityksestä ja neuvostoelämän realiteeteista liikkui paljon totuutena pidettyjä valheita, oli tavallista arkea. Olin kasvanut maailmassa, jossa miehittäjä oli päässyt kirjoittamaan Viron historian mieleisekseen ja neuvostopropagandan jäljet ulottuivat myös Neuvostoliiton rajojen ulkopuolelle.
    ellauri286.html on line 108: Vaikka olin toki tietoisesti kirjoittamassa juuri romaania, Viron lähihistoria päätyi sen aiheeksi vahingossa, ja käsitys siitä, että aihepiiri oli tärkeä, vahvistui vasta kirjoittamisen myötä.
    ellauri286.html on line 110: Uudelleenitsenäistyneessä Virossa lähihistorian käsittely oli yhä polttavan ajankohtaista, mutta ikätoverini Suomessa pitivät Neuvostoliittoa aiheena, joka oli menneen talven lumia.
    ellauri286.html on line 112: Venäjää ei nähty imperiumina eikä osattu kuvitella, että se aikoisi yhä harjoittaa imperialistista politiikkaansa, vaikka samaan aikaan se sotkeutui jatkuvasti Baltian maiden pyrkimykseen kirjoittaa omaa historiaansa ja osoittautui hyvin hankalaksi ja neuvottelutahdottomaksi osapuoleksi esimerkiksi rajojen vahvistamisen suhteen. No se nyt olikin tosi naivia, talousjärjestelmä ja reviirin valvonta on 2 eri asiaa.
    ellauri286.html on line 116: Esimerkiksi Ukrainan ex­presidentti Viktor Janukovitsh suhtautui lähihistorian hutkimiseen aggressiivisesti, joten vasta hänen syrjäyttämisensä mahdollisti sen, että historiantutkijat pääsivät jälleen rauhassa vanhan kunnon historian uudelleenkirjoitustyön pariin.
    ellauri286.html on line 119: Hänen mukaansa Ukrainan tilanteen kriisiytymisen yksi syy oli se, että viimeisen 25 vuoden aikana Ukraina ei analysoinut historiaansa eikä kehittänyt työkaluja, joilla selvittäisiin totalitarismin seurauksista. Nyt vapaaehtoisvoimin koottu ja ylläpidetty elektroninen arkisto tarjoaa kaikille pääsyn KGB-arkistoihin. Mutta tähän tilanteeseen pääsy vei vuosikymmeniä ja edessä on paljon työtä.
    ellauri286.html on line 127: Kirja vastaa myös kysymyksiin siitä, miksi neuvostoaikaiseen ns. historiantutkimukseen ja sen tuloksiin ei voi luottaa sokeasti, ja painottaa lähdekritiikin merkitystä. Neuvostoliitossa historia oli väline, joilla oikeutettiin miehitys (toisinkuin lännessä, haha!) ja neuvostohistorian tutkimuksen metodit vain imitoivat tieteellisen tutkimuksen metodeja.
    ellauri286.html on line 161: Lukemani kirjat ja näkemäni elokuvat eivät käsitelleet Viron lähihistoriaa tai Neuvostoliittoa niin, että olisin tunnistanut itse kokemani Neuvostoliiton, siis samalla lailla kuin Amerikan mainstream-ohjelmistosta tunnistaa todellisen USA:n. Tunnistettava Viron lähihistoria siirtyi tuolloin sukupolvelta toisella oraalisen tradition kautta, ei kirjoitetun. Se siirtyi rivien välien kautta.
    ellauri286.html on line 165: Minulla olisi ollut konkreettinen vertailukohta aivan samalla tavalla kuin jo nuorena osasin pitää naisten asemaa taidehistoriassa epäoikeudenmukaisena, mutta sitäkään en olisi osannut konkretisoida sanoiksi, korkeintaan tunteeksi epäoikeudenmukaisuudesta, ellei minulla olisi ollut saatavilla kirjoja, joissa asiaa käsiteltiin, tai elleivät naistaiteilijat ja -kirjailijat olisi puhuneet julkisesti asiasta.
    ellauri286.html on line 177: Hänen pohdiskelut merkistä paljastavat, kuinka vaikeaa on ymmärtää jonkin asian koko historia vain sitä tarkkailemalla. Ihmishenkiä kuitenkin määrittelee menetys – jopa niinkin arvokkaat esineet kuin jalokivet katoavat. Hänen viittauksensa Tubeen osoittaa erityistä ambivalenssia teknologiaa ja nykyajan yrityksiä hallita luontoa ja rakentaa tehokasta teollista elämää kohtaan.
    ellauri286.html on line 179: Kertoja tajuaa, että merkki ei ole reikä ja ihmettelee , onko se ruusunlehti. Hän vertaa vaippareunuksen pölyä pölyyn, joka hautasi Troyn, ja pitää itseään köyhänä taloudenhoitajana. Puu koputtaa ikkunaa ulkona, ja kertoja kuvaa Shakespearen istumassa nojatuolissa hänen kaltaisensa tulen edessä ja toivottelevansa keskeytyksetöntä elämää. Hänen Shakespearea koskeva historiallinen fiktionsa kyllästää häntä, ja hän kaipaa päästä miellyttävään ajatusketjuun, joka heijastaisi häntä hyvin.
    ellauri286.html on line 185: Viittaus minäkuvaan on ironista, sillä kertoja antaa hyvin vähän yksityiskohtia elämästään tässä tietoisuuden virrassa – jos tämä "romantisoitu kuva" kuitenkin viittaa hänen ajatuksiinsa oppineista miehistä ja sivilisaatiosta, myöhempi kuva tuntemattomista ihmisistä. Omnibussi vahvistaa tuossa sivilisaatiossa todellisuudessa esiintyvän vieraantuneisuuden ja anonymiteetin. Hänen hyppynsä yleistyksiin herättää jälleen kiehtovan sodan, vaikka hänen kyynisyytensä sivilisaatiosta johtaa heikkoon toivoon. Jos nykyiset tavat ovat vain "pukutettuja" versioita todellisuudesta, ajan kuluminen sallii muutokset tässä todellisuudessa ja vapautumispotentiaalin.
    ellauri286.html on line 187: No joo, onhan siinä sepustusta. Minä luin tekstin kehotuksena katsella arkea tuorein silmin ja kirjoittaa elämän pienimmistä yksityiskohdista. Tulkinnastani huolimatta en nähnyt Viron historiaa kirjallisena aiheena. Vaikka olihan vallankumouxessa nimenomaan kysymys omaisuuden menetyxestä, ellei ize sattunut olemaan pennitön prole.
    ellauri286.html on line 192: Virginia Woolfin täplä seinässä paljastui lopulta etanaksi. Se on hyvä vertaus myös omalle suhteelleni Viron lähihistoriasta kirjoittamiseen: vasta sateella kotiloonsa kätkeytynyt etana tulee näkyviin ja näyttää sarvensa, ja juuri niin kävi minulle.
    ellauri286.html on line 193: Vapaampi ilmapiiri eli sade mahdollisti sen, että löysin kielen Viron lähihistorialle. Ensin aihe livahti romaanikäsikirjoitukseeni metaforien ja symbolien muodossa, toisin sanoen juuri rivien välien kautta, joilla olin tottunut käsittelemään asiaa, ja vähitellen niiden avulla löysin kielen, jolla kirjoittaa aiheesta suoraan russofobista vihapuhetta. 2000-luvun alku oli siihen sopiva hetki, 9/11 jälkeen Bushin aikoihin ei tarvinnut vihapuhetta paljon hävetä.
    ellauri286.html on line 197: Vuosituhannen vaiheessa Venäjästä kirjoittava kirjailija sai kuitenkin vielä kirjoittaa Venäjästä ja sen historiapolitiikasta täysin rauhassa. Vaikka törmäsin jälkisuomettuneisiin äänensävyihin, Venäjästä kirjoittavat kirjailijat tai toimittajat eivät vielä kohdanneet ilmiöitä, joiden kanssa näillä saroilla sananvapauttaan käyttävät ihmiset joutuivat tekemisiin vain joitakin vuosia myöhemmin. Pro-Putin -mielenosoittajia ei näkynyt eikä Viron Moskovan-suurlähettiläästä, sittemmin ulkoministeristä, venäläis-latvialaisesta Marina Kaljurandista, tehty rivoja nukkeja Moskovassa, kuten vuonna 2007. Vaikka kyyditys- tai miehitys-sanojen käyttö ei ollut yhtä luontevaa kuin nykyään ja toisinaan niiden kanssa haparoitiin, kukaan ei Suomessa vielä kieltänyt kyydityksiä, kuten vain vähän myöhemmin kävi. Niitähän tehtailtiin Suomessakin 30-luvulla.
    ellauri286.html on line 202: Vuonna 2007 Viron lähihistoriasta kertova näytelmäni Puhdistus sai kantaesityksensä Suomen kansallisteatterissa, ja paria kuukautta myöhemmin pronssisotilaskiista kuumensi ja kylmensi tunteita Virossa.
    ellauri286.html on line 206: Patsaasta tuli symboli, joka konkretisoi erilaiset näkemykset historiasta.
    ellauri286.html on line 229: 2000-luku oli aikaa, jolloin Itä-Euroopan ja Baltian maissa palautettiin historiantutkimus jälleen historiantutkimukseksi, ei itä- vaan länsipropagandan työkaluksi, vakiinnutettiin sen työkaluja ja luotiin perustaa lähihistorian tutkimukselle.
    ellauri286.html on line 232: Samaan aikaan perestroikan ja Boris Jeltsinin aikana perustetut Gulag-historiaa dokumentoivat järjestöt, kuten Memorial, ovat Venäjällä joutuneet tilanteeseen, jossa niiden toimintaa vaikeutetaan jatkuvasti, ja ne on leimattu “ulkomaisiksi agenteiksi”.
    ellauri286.html on line 236: Suomessa aktivoitui Pro-Putin-ryhmä, joka ryhtyi julkaisemaan kirjoja, perusti yhdistyksiä ja järjesti keskustelutilaisuuksia, joissa toisteltiin vanhoja neuvostoteesejä. Erityisesti heitä kiinnosti Viron historia: miehityksen ja kyyditysten kieltäminen. Suomalainen media hämmentyi.
    ellauri286.html on line 239: Kun minä ja kirjailija Imbi Paju julkaisimme vuonna 2010 Viron lähihistoriaa käsittelevän artikkelikokoelman Kaiken takana oli russofobia, Yhtenäinen Venäjä, Putinin puolue, teki lehdistötiedotteen, jossa kirja määriteltiin russofobiseksi – ja vanhaan kunnon neuvostotyyliin tiedote lähetettiin ulos jo ennen kuin itse kirja oli ulkona ja ennen kuin Yhtenäinen Venäjä olisi edes voinut tutustua kirjan sisältöön.
    ellauri286.html on line 242: Se, että Viron lähihistorian käsittely oli Venäjälle hankala asia, ei sinänsä ollut uutta. Venäjä myönsi 1990-luvun alussa julkisesti miehittäneensä Viron, mutta Jeltsinin vuosien jälkeen Venäjä on jatkuvasti pyrkinyt tuomaan esille omaa tulkintaansa Viron neuvostovuosista, kieltänyt miehityksen, pyrkinyt rehabilitoimaan Molotov-Ribbentropin sopimusta ja häirinnyt esimerkiksi kyydittäjien oikeudenkäyntejä Virossa.
    ellauri286.html on line 302: Kirjassani historialliseen henkilöön pohjautuva Edgar työskentelee KGB:lle – ja myös Kodumaa-lehdelle, joka oli KGB:n menestyksekäs projekti: lehdeksi naamioitu vaikutusväline, joka oli kohdistettu ulkomailla asuvaan vironkieliseen väestöön. Kyseessä oli ainoa vironkielinen julkaisu, jota sai tilata ulkomaille.
    ellauri286.html on line 330: Sosiaalisen median ja perinteisen median talousvaikeuksien ja henkilöstövajauksen vuoksi se asettaa tavallisen kansalaisen tilanteeseen, jossa medianlukutaidon merkitys on valtava ja jossa meillä jokaisella on vastuu siitä, levitämmekö eteenpäin uutisia – vai valeuutisia. [Kai jo jaoit tämän jutun kontakteillesi? Kai sallit TS:lle pääsyn yhteystietoihisi? Jos et, tee se heti! Setä Sam luottaa sinuun!]
    ellauri286.html on line 363: Ottaen huomioon Viron ja Suomen historian, maiden nopea nousu sananvapausindeksin kärkisijoille on merkittävää, ellei peräti hämmästyttävää.
    ellauri286.html on line 373: Merkittävä osa merkittävistä venäläisistä kirjailijoista on muuttanut ulkomaille. Merkittävä kirjailija Mihail Shishkinin mukaan merkittävä ero neuvostoaikaan on se, että nyt toisinajattelijat nimenomaan halutaan pois maasta. Hah, kyllä ne haluttiin pois maasta neuvostoaikanakin, mutteivät ne lähteneet, tarrasivat synnyinmaahan kuin Tintin laastari.
    ellauri286.html on line 376: Šiškin (kirjoitetaan usein Shishkin) on ainoana venäläiskirjailijana voittanut kaikki maansa arvostetuimmat kirjallisuuspalkinnot, mm. Vuoden esikoisen 1993, Venäjän Bookerin 2000, Valtakunnallisen bestsellerin 2005 ja Suuri kirja -palkinnon 2006.
    ellauri286.html on line 377: Teoxia: Sota vai rauha: kirjoituxia lännestä. Šiškiniä on verrattu muiden muassa Orhan Pamukiin ja J. M. Coetzeehen. Vuodesta 1995 Šiškin on asunut Sveitsissä. Hän kirjoittaa myös saksaksi. Vuonna 1995 Shishkin muutti Sveitsiin perhesyistä. Hän työskenteli Zürichissä maahanmuuttoministeriössä ja erityisesti pakolaisten parissa venäjän ja saksan kääntäjänä. Hän on naimisissa kääntäjänsä kanssa (Zhenjya, kuvassa). Hänellä on Sveitsin kansalaisuus. Sen vaimo Zhenya pitelee sen päätä ettei se käänny enempää vasemmalle. Zhenya on sen kääntäjä. Vähän väliä käydään kääntymässä USA:ssa propagandaretkillä Harrimanin kustannuxella. W Averell Harriman, better known as Averell (Pää kiinni, Averell! Anna sen sytytyslangan olla, Averell!) Rautatieparoni E. H. Harrimanin poika, Harriman toimi Neuvostoliiton suurlähettiläänä ja osallistui suuriin toisen maailmansodan konferensseihin. Isänsä rahoilla hän perusti WA Harriman & Co -pankkitoiminnan vuonna 1922. Harrimanilla oli 3 erittäinkin lukratiivista avioliittoa. Harriman veti naruja, jotta hänen tyttärensä Kathleen voisi seurata häntä Neuvostoliittoon palvelemaan hänen avustajanaan. Kaksi kolmasosaa Yhdysvaltojen viereisen talven trumpetistijoutsenista viettää kauden Harriman State Parkissa.
    ellauri286.html on line 382: Hänen uusi romaaninsa Neittokiva puhuu tärkeimmästä aiheesta: kuinka voittaa kuolema rakkaudella. Mixi kuolemaa pitäis ylipäänsä voittaa? Talousliberaalit ei osaa muusta puhua kuin voitosta. Kriitikot May ja Kucherskaya kuvaili Shishkinin romaania seuraavasti: "Neittokiva on loistava romaani sanasta ja kielestä, joka tulee pehmeäksi ja tottelevaiseksi mestarin käsissä. Se voi luoda minkä tahansa muun todellisuuden, joka on upeampi ja upeampi. Uskottava, että todellinen maailma. Kuilu sanan ja tosiasian, todellisuuden ja sen ihmiskielelle käännöksen välillä on todellinen sisäisen jännitteen pesä romaanissa. Sen venäjä alkaa kyllä olla vähän vanhakantaista." Boris Dralyuk kirjoitti The Times Literary Supplementissaettä "Shishkinin ihmeellinen eruditio, kapea ilmaisu ja taipumus yleiseen leikkiin ovat hänen taiteensa silmiinpistäviä osia... Nämä ominaisuudet todellakin yhdistävät hänet Nabokovin kanssa, samoin kuin hänen uskonsa kirjoitetun sanan voimaan: "Tarina on käsi, ja sinä olet käsine. Tarinat muuttavat sinua, kuten käsineet. Sinun on ymmärrettävä, että tarinat ovat eläviä olentoja, kuten käsineet."
    ellauri286.html on line 384: The Guardian vielä kirjoitti: "Molemmat romaanit yrittävät edustaa monitahoista todellisuutta, ja joskus on sietämätöntä intensiteettiä, kun metaforat versovat ja vääntelevät. niissä on selkeästi venäläinen sävy, Neitsythiiren hengästyminen muuttuu valossa ja pimeässä mitatummaksi loistoksi; Shishkinin tehtävän kiireellisyyttä ei himmennetä. Tšehov välitti inhimillisyyttään - ettei tekstissäsi voi olla täysin negatiivisia hahmoja. Ja Tolstoilta opin, että ei pelätä olla naiivi.
    ellauri286.html on line 386: Shishkin vastustaa avoimesti Venäjän nykyistä hallitusta ja arvostelee jyrkästi Vladimir Putinin sisä- ja ulkopolitiikkaa, mukaan lukien Krimin liittäminen vuonna 2014.
    ellauri286.html on line 387: Shishkin vertaa kirjoitusprosessia verensiirtoon: "Jaan lukijani kanssa elämän tärkeimmän olemuksen. Mutta meillä on oltava sama veriryhmä." Hän vastusti Venäjän vuoden 2022 hyökkäystä Ukrainaan ja kirjoitti The Guardianissa, että "Putin tekee hirviömäisiä rikoksia kansani, maani ja ennen kaikkea minun nimissä" ja sanoi, että "Putinin Venäjällä on mahdotonta hengittää. Poliisin haju. Kenkä on liian vahva. Täältä alpeilta käryn näkee selvästi haistamattakin."
    ellauri286.html on line 499: Eesti vapp on meidän isosedän herttuallinen vaakuna. Vanim Eesti vapp pärineb ajavahemikust 1583, mil kolme leopardse lõviga hertsogivapp tähistas Rootsi kuninga Johan III Liivimaa hertsogi tiitlit. Leopardit on vasempaan päinkazovia leijonia, passant gardant. Ei sentään trabant. Kolme leijonaa on peräisin Tanskan kuninkaan Valdemar II:n käsivarresta , joka valloitti Pohjois-Viron vuonna 1219. Leijonista tuli osa Tallinnan (Rääveli), Tanskan hallituksen keskuksen suurempaa vaakunaa.
    ellauri286.html on line 529: Sofi Oksasta ja Olga Tokarczukia on verrattu toisiinsa: molemmilla on rastastukka ja siinä pidennys. Molemmat tematisoivat historiaan toistumista nykyisyydessä. Myös se on heillä yhteistä, että molemmat ovat autodidakteja. (No ei, ainoastaan Sofi on, Olga valmistui kai psykologixi.) Heidän naispäähenkilöidensä kautta historia muuttuu autofiktioksi.
    ellauri286.html on line 540: Bulimia on yleisempää niillä, joilla on lähisukulainen äiti, jolla on sairaus. Genetiikasta johtuvan riskin prosentuaalinen osuus on 30–80%. Muita taudin riskitekijöitä ovat psykologinen stressi, kulttuurinen paine saavuttaa tietty vartalotyyppi, huono itsetunto ja liikalihavuus. Eläminen virolaisessa kulttuurissa, joka kaupallistaa tai hohdottaa laihduttamisen ja korkokengät, ja painoon kiinnittyvien fasististen vanhempien hahmot ovat myös riskejä.
    ellauri286.html on line 549: BPD on luokiteltu DSMssä dramaattisiin persoonallisuushäiriöihin, jossa on antisosiaalinen, histrioninen ja narsistinen persoonallisuushäiriö. Naisilla se diagnosoidaan noin kolme kertaa niin usein kuin miehillä.
    ellauri288.html on line 134: Isoisä oli kokenut elämässään Viron historian mullistukset, sillä hän kuului sodan aikana metsäveljiin, nazivaltaa kannattaviin joukkoihin. Isoäidin komeroon kerrastojen alle piilotettiin nazisotilas.
    ellauri288.html on line 194: Länsimainen vaihtoehtoinen käsitys totuudesta (amerikkalaisten kehittämä pragmaattinen totuusmääritelmä) ei ole itsestäänselvyys maassa, jossa valtio on adoptoinut neuvostokäsitykset faktoista. Marxismi-leninismin opit eivät tunnustaneet objektiivista tai absoluuttista totuutta. Roskaa, kylläpäs tunnustivat, nimittäin historiallisen materialismin totuuden. Kirjaimellisesti kaikki tiesivät, etteivät Neuvostoliiton vaalit olleet vapaita. Siitä huolimatta vaalituloksiin suhtauduttiin kuin ne olisivat faktoja. Faktoja ne olivatkin. Ehdokasasettelu jo takasi että proletariaatin diktatuuri säilyisi. Ei siitä ollut mitään väärinkäsityxiä.
    ellauri288.html on line 274: ”Sofi Oksasen häiritsevä, mukaansatempaava romaani Purge. ..on järkytys. Vuonna 1992 sijoittuva Purge sijoittuu vuodelle 1992, kun Berliinin muurin purkamisen turmeltumaton iloinen optimismi on vain kolme vuotta, ja Purge jatkaa sumutusta osoittaakseen, kuinka vuosikymmeniä kestänyt mustamaalaus vääntää entisen Neuvostoliiton ihanneyhteiskunnasta rikollisuuden ja julmuuden leimaaman yhteiskunnan. Oksanen käsittelee tätä laajempaa teemaa tiukassa, epäsovinnaisessa rikosromaanissa, jota välittävät kauhistuttavat hiljaisuudet, häpeälliset paljastukset ja vastenmieliset läheisyydet (mm. runkun popsinta). Korvaamalla historian fiktiolla (kuin veroilmoituxessa henkilökohtaisella tasolla), Oksanen… tekee pelkän selviytymisen kustannukset sairaan käsin kosketeltavaksi… Sekä noirin että satujen herättäminen Purgessa on koukuttavaa luettavaa.” NPR, Yhdysvallat
    ellauri288.html on line 279: Pursoke on romaani, joka yhdistää taitavasti fiktiota ja historiaa, runoutta ja vulgaarisuutta, halveksuntaa ja transsendenssia. Marianne, Ranska
    ellauri288.html on line 287: Mukava lukukokemus! Kiihkeä jännitys tarttuu lukijaan ensimmäisistä riveistä lähtien. Oksanen on narukävelijä. Hän kexii kivat yksityiskohdat (mm. runkun popsinta) ja antaa niille vaaditun painon ja merkityksen. Sofi Oksanen on tällä vahvalla, kirjallisella kerronnallaan antanut meille ainutlaatuisen näkemyksen Viron nykyhistorian lisäksi. Lävistävästi ja armottomasti hän paljastaa julmien poliittisten hallintojen inhimillisen haitan. Dagsavisen, Norja
    ellauri288.html on line 289: Epätavallisen vahva romaani. Oksanen kuvaa kauhistuttavimman armottoman yksityiskohtaisesti. Oksanen on poikkeuksellisen taitava ällötyxien rakentamisessa. Tämä on brutaali romaani. Se on raa´asti fyysistä; se paljastaa pelaamiemme suurempien ja pienempien pelien julmuuden, ja sitä on julman jännittävää lukea. NRK, Norja
    ellauri288.html on line 298: Vaikks rakkauden suhteen heikko, Aliide Truun loppuratkaisussa on Vanhan testamentin Hesekielin äkillisyyttä, joka on katarsista. Ämmä menee lastauttamaan ryssät hengiltä. Oksanen yhdistää Aliiden traagisen historian kautta poliittisen henkilökohtaiseen, historian nykyhetkeen. Aamulehti, Suomi
    ellauri288.html on line 310: Sofi Oksanen liikkuu edestakaisin historiassa, veistämällä aikaa kynäveitsellään. Niin kukoistava, rakastava ja suojeleva… hänen kielensä näyttää olevan tehty avaamaan kokonaisten sukupolvien haavat. Telerama, Ranska
    ellauri288.html on line 316: Kuten trillerissä, löydämme kaksi rinnakkaista tarinaa väkivallasta, jotka kertovat virolaisten naisten onnettoman historian. La Repubblica, Italia
    ellauri288.html on line 342: Sofi Oksasen Puristus on karkea ja voimakas muotokuva Viron historiasta. Gara, Espanja
    ellauri288.html on line 515: Kaplinskin inspiroija ja vaikuttaja oli amerikkalainen teologi ja filosofi Alan Watts (1915–1973). Vastenmielinen sadisti-isä komplekseineen. Wattsin yhden kirjan otsikko onkin Buddhism, The Religion of No-Religion ja sehän on viroksi Usk on uskumatus (Usko on uskomattomuus)! Kaplinski itse toivoi uteliaiden toimittajien pysyvän elämästään kaukana hänen oleskellessaan mahdollisimman paljon poissa kaupungista kesähuvilallaan.
    ellauri288.html on line 523: Kuva vuotuisen ulkonäkö keisari hänen kuolemansa jälkeen tuli legendaarinen ja näkyy paitsi zedlitz, mutta myös Heinrich Heine, joka, kuten Goethe oli fani kaikkivoipa diktaattori. Palattuaan Ranskassa lyhyen aikaa, loistava ilmalaiva, jolle ei ole miehistöä. Kuitenkin se on varustettu valurautainen aseet ja valmiina valloittamaan maailmaa. Ilmalaiva Lermontov merkit kilpa täysissä purjeissa sininen aaltoja, ottaa vain yhden yön keisari.
    ellauri288.html on line 564: PS:n kansanedustaja Teemu Keskisarja ei tiskaa, imuroi tai pese pyykkiä. Se on historiallisesti totta, vahvistaa Teemu. Sähkölaitteet ovat nykyisin mielettömän vaikeita, enkä ole opetellut niiden käyttöä, Kääpiösarja kommentoi Iltalehdelle. Myöskään ruokaa Höyhensarja ei laita.
    ellauri288.html on line 571: Kun Keskisarjalta kysyy pyykkien viikkaamisesta, hän naurahtaa ja sanoo, ettei ”rehellisesti edes tiedä, mitä se tarkoittaa”. Koen vaipan vaihdon paljon miellyttävämmäksi työksi kuin kansanedustajan tai historioitsijan työn. Vauvan paska haisee vähemmän kuin aikuisten. Hallizen sen paremmin.
    ellauri290.html on line 45: Israelin poikien sukukunnat ovat nuijineet naapureitaan Vanhan testamentin malliin aina siionismin maahanmuuton voimistuttua 1. maailmansodan jälkeen, listien mielin määrin filistealaisia ja muita tienoilla pyöriskelleitä laiskoja pakanoita. Reviiristä on nahisteltu abrahamilaisten apinaserkkujen kanssa suunnilleen 10 vuoden väliajoin ja rättipäitä heitetty ulos maasta tai kuopattu isänmaansa poveen joka kerta. Esinahkakukkulat on alkaneet yletä taas kuin Joosuan aikoina. Vittu niinhän Jehova (Moosexelle joskus 1446 BC-1225 BC) ja länsivallat (1917 Balfour declaration) oli niille luvanneet, ja lupauxensa pettäjä on kanankakan kantaja. (Tosin McMahon oli 1916 luvannut Husseinille brittien antavan Arabian arabeille, jos ne uhmaisivat ottomaaneja. Mutta se oli silloin ja nyt on nyt.)
    ellauri290.html on line 230: Israelin joukkojen sotilasyksiköiden mieletön hyökkäys Siinain niemimaalle viime lokakuussa räjäytti myytin siitä, että Israel oli arabien aggression uhri. Sionistit eivät tyytyneet "pysäyttämään Nasseria" - mitä tahansa tämä kyseenalainen selitys heidän Egyptiin kohdistuneelle hyökkäykselleen tarkoittaisikaan. He olivat päättäneet pitää hallussaan egyptiläisiä alueita, jotka olivat kolme kertaa suurempia kuin nykyinen Israelin miehittämä Palestiinan alue ja joista ei voitu esittää edes "historiallista väitettä".
    ellauri290.html on line 484: To this figure should be added those refugees who are not registered with the Agency because they are either self-supporting, or had emigrated to other parts of the world. Those refugees a e estimated as follows:
    ellauri294.html on line 82: Samaan aikaan toisaalla kun Wilhelm Walloittaja walloitti Englannin, julmat selzhukkisulttaanit lähti liikenteeseen länteenpäin. Siitä kertoo tv-sarja Heräämisen kuvaus: Suuret seldžukit. Eletään vuotta 1072. Turkkilaiset selcukit elivät vaikeita aikoja kuin Akun puhuva koira. Sisäiset konfliktit heikensivät heidän vahvuuttaan, jonka ulkopuoliset viholliset käyttivät heti hyväkseen. Mutta kun viisas hallitsija sulttaani Melik Shah tulee valtaan, tilanne alkaa muuttua parempaan suuntaan. Hänen ansiosta Seldžukkien valtakunta valloittaa uusia alueita, kasvaa uskomattoman suureksi ja vahvistaa siten valtaansa. Melik jäi historiaan paitsi rohkeana soturina, myös teiden rakentajana, moskeijana sekä tutkijoiden ja runoilijoiden suojelijana.
    ellauri294.html on line 200: Tämän numeron ilmaantumisen myötä voit odottaa, että sinua tulvii monia uusia mahdollisuuksia ja mahtavia asioita, joten hyödynnä niitä uskomalla ja luottamalla taitojasi ja kykyihisi. Vaikka oletkin hämmentynyt matkasi tiettyinä hetkinä, tiedä, että sinulla on kyky oppia ja sopeutua nopeasti.
    ellauri294.html on line 202: Lopuksi, kun sinulla on enemmän kuin koskaan tarvitset, varmista, että jaat edistymisesi muiden ihmisten elämässä – muista niitä, jotka auttoivat sinut huipulle, ja pidä huolta köyhistä. Universumi palkitsee sinut jatkossakin suurilla mahdollisuuksilla niin kauan kuin palvelet ihmiskuntaa.
    ellauri294.html on line 304: He haluavat meidän mustaavan luontaisen luonteemme, unelmoivan isosti ja linjaavan ajatuksemme maailmankaikkeuden isoimpien pahisten kanssa. Nyt hei kaatamaan toisten päälle kylmää mehua!
    ellauri294.html on line 336: Ja nyt tulee koko kertomuxen kaunein kohta! Tekla ei suinkaan alkanut heti rähistä pelkurille Paavolle, vaan sanoi vaan: Olen saanut peson, oi Paavali. Siveellisen puhtoisuuden vaatimus oli täytetty. No ei niistä kumminkaan tullut paria, vaan lähtivät kumpikin omalle lähetysalalleen.
    ellauri294.html on line 457: When he saw Peter and John about to enter, he asked them for money. 4 Peter looked straight at him, as did John. Then Peter said, “Look at us!” 5 So the man gave them his attention, expecting to get something from them.6 Then Peter said, “Silver or gold I do not have, but what I do have I give you. In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, walk.” 7 Taking him by the right hand, he helped him up, and instantly the man’s feet and ankles became strong. 8 He jumped to his feet and began to walk. Bugger it. Siinä meni hyvä leipäpuu.
    ellauri294.html on line 677: Amelia (Newport) Wagner aloitti uransa Chautauquanina 12-vuotiaana, kun hän liittyi Colorado Humanities Young Chautauqua -ohjelmaan Greeleyssä, Coloradossa. Amelia oli yksi ensimmäisistä nuorista Chautauquaneista, jotka esiintyivät High Plains Chautauquan päälavalla vuonna 2005. Myöhemmin hän palasi päälavalle vuonna 2008 esittäen Anna Howard Shaw´ta. Hän valmistui Denverin yliopistosta vuonna 2012 kandidaatin tutkinnolla englannista ja historiasta. Amelian koulussa tekemä historiallinen tutkimus herätti perustutkintoneuvoston huomion ja keväällä 2012 hänet kutsuttiin esittelemään opinnäytetyönsä kongressin jäsenille. Amelia oli ensimmäisen persoonan elävän historian tulkki Denverin luonto- ja tiedemuseon Pompeji-näyttelyssä, joka päättyi tammikuussa 2013.
    ellauri294.html on line 683: Amelia Wagner aloitti uransa Chautauquanina 12-vuotiaana, kun hän liittyi Young Chautauqua -ohjelmaan Greeleyssä. Amelia oli yksi ensimmäisistä nuorista chautauquaneista, jotka esiintyivät High Plains Chautauquan päälavalla (2004), ja palasi takaisin päälavalle Nuorena Chautauquanina vuonna 2008. Hän valmistui Denverin yliopistosta vuonna 2012 kandidaattitutkinnolla englanniksi. ja Historia. Keväällä 2012 konferenssissa Amelia kutsuttiin esittelemään opinnäytetyönsä kongressin jäsenille perustutkinnon neuvoston kautta. Valmistuttuaan Amelia työskenteli Denverin luonnon- ja tiedemuseossa historiallisena näyttelijänä. Hänen ensimmäinen sexikokemuksensa aikuisena Chautauquanina tuli vuonna 2013, kun hän esitti Margaret Meadin HPC:ssä. Amelia on työskennellyt viimeisen vuoden kiihkeänä ja iloisena esikoulun opettajana Denverissä.
    ellauri294.html on line 689: Presidentti Theodore Roosevelt kutsui kerran Chautauquaa "amerikkalaisimmaksi asiaksi Amerikassa". Matkateltta Chautauquas oli lyseum-liikkeen jälkikasvu, ja se kehittyi 1900-luvun alussa tuomaan Amerikan maaseudulle saman laadukkaan viihteen, historian ja kulttuurin kuin kaupunkilaistenkin saatavilla. Circuit Chautauquas on mallinnettu New Yorkin osavaltion lounaisosassa sijaitsevan Chautauqua-instituutin mukaan, yhteisössä, jossa on kesän pitkiä ohjelmia poliitikkojen, kirjailijoiden, teologien ja muusikoiden toimesta.
    ellauri294.html on line 714: Sanon, että sinun pitäisi rikastua, ja sinun velvollisuutesi on rikastua... Miehet, jotka rikastuvat, voivat olla rehellisimpiä miehiä, joita löydät yhteisöstä. Sanon tässä selvästi... yhdeksän, kymmen, tai ehkä kahdeksan sadasta Amerikan rikkaista miehistä on rehellisiä. Siksi he ovat rikkaita. Siksi heihin luototetaan rahaa. Siksi he tekevät suuria yrityksiä ja löytävät paljon ihmisiä työskentelemään heidän kanssaan. Se johtuu siitä, että he ovat rehellisiä miehiä. ... Tunnen myötätuntoa köyhiä kohtaan, mutta niiden köyhien määrä, joita on syytä tuntea, on hyvin pieni. Tuntea myötätuntoa miehelle, jota Jumala on rankaisenut hänen synneistään... on väärää tekemistä. ... Muistakaamme, ettei Yhdysvalloissa ole köyhää ihmistä, jota hänen omat puutteensa eivät olisi köyhdyttäyneet...
    ellauri297.html on line 44: Materialism is the butt of every Dad joke. A child comes to the father of their youth, and say, “Dad, I’m hungry,” to which the beloved father figure replies, “Hello Hungry, I’m Dad!” It pokes fun at the idea that our whole identity could be the sum total of our physical markers, desires and chemical reactions. This would be akin to someone ‘coming out,’ to us and us responding, “Hello Gay! I’m Cis!” It’s ludicrous! But, our culture still does it–quite a bit, actually. We define ourselves and others concretely based on what we own rather than on what we cannot see; our souls.
    ellauri297.html on line 62: Mitä tulaa intertextuaalisuuteen, niin onhan tällästä paasausta ollut maailman sivu, epäluotettavia kertojia ja kirjallista lainausta, ota vaikka koko juutalaisten historia, kuten kreikkalaistenkin (vaikka Plutarkhos), ja sitten vielä 1600-luvulla Burtonin Melancholia. Nytten on koko internetti yxi iso intertexti. Kazo vaikka:
    ellauri297.html on line 90: coulda been a contender. I coulda been somebody.” Despite its innovative features and stellar reputation as a driver’s car, the Imp was never a contender. This tiny machine was launched too late to compete, beset with corporate mistakes and bedeviled by a lack of development. As the BBC program “The Car’s the Star” described it, the Imp was “the wrong car built at the wrong time by the wrong people at the wrong place.”
    ellauri297.html on line 98: Hoosea oli pitkän linjan profeetta, sillä hän toimi yhteensä noin 40 vuoden ajan. Hänen keskeisin tehtävä (sic) kohdistui pohjoisen Israelin varoittamiseen tulevasta tuomiosta kansan vakavan juopumuksen tähden. Kansalla oli kaamea jano. Hoosean perhetaustasta emme tiedä paljoakaan. Sen sijaan hänen perhe-elämänsä tulee hyvin tutuksi, sillä se oli esikuvana Jumalan ja Israelin välisestä liitosta: Hoosean tuli ottaa itselleen haureellinen vaimo, joka sai lapsia toisista miehistä. Lapsille tuli antaa nimet, jotka kuvasivat kansan juopumusta ja rikkoutunutta isäsuhdetta Jumalaan. Nimet olivat: Jumala siementää, ei armoa, ei meikäläisiä. Ahaa, siinä selvisi kuka oli lasten biologinen isä! ja Hoosean tuli olla uskollinen. Vaikka hänen avioliitto (sic) rikkoutui kerran, hänen tuli vielä uudelleen ottaa, jopa lunastaa maksua vastaan uskoton vaimonsa takaisin. Mitä vittua! Hyvää rahaa huonon perään! Hoosean syvä tuska ilmensi Jumalan syvää tuskaa oman kansansa tähden. Että tulikin ruiskastua tällänen.
    ellauri297.html on line 373: Ex-Oldest Man In The World Dead In NYC At 111; He Put On Tefillin Two Months Ago For First Time Since His Bar Mitzvah, but it did not help. He is dead. World’s oldest man living confirmed as Juan Vicente Pérez aged 112 in Venezuela. Bugger it. Besides agriculture, one of Juan's most important passions is to build a strong relationship with God and his family. He is grateful for his life, as well as the food and the people that surround him.
    ellauri297.html on line 375: Imich spent his career as a chemist, ultimately trying to prove to other scientists that the neshama (soul) survives physical death. In 1995, at the age of 92, he edited and published a book called Incredible Tales of the Paranormal.
    ellauri297.html on line 376: Born in Poland in 1903, Imich underwent his schooling there, including earning a Ph.D. in chemistry 1927. He survived two World Wars, the Holocaust and two years in a Russian labor camp near the White Sea, before surviving another lifetime in the U.S. with his wife, Wela. She passed away in 1986.
    ellauri297.html on line 378: A 30-year-old rabbi helped Imich wrap tefillin. He had lost his hearing aids at the hospital, which made communicating difficult; nevertheless, the two men connected the tefillin ok. Imich had not put on tefillin since his Bar Mitzvah—nearly 100 years ago—in Czestochowa, Poland.
    ellauri297.html on line 453: 6. Kuudenneksi, ei opeteta tai harjoiteta mitään perinnettä, joka kieltää selkeän käskyn pyhissä kirjoituksissa tai ulkoistaa yksilöllistä kuuliaisuutta Sanalle kenellekään henkilölle tai järjestölle, parakirkolle tai muuten heidän taidoistaan, voimavaroistaan, koulutuxesta tai asiantuntemuxesta riippumatta.
    ellauri297.html on line 560: Afrikka ja Kuhmo-vertailu on Patin kirjan paras vaihe, naurattava ja täysin uskottava. Itäsuomalaiset on apinoita. Kyllä tiedettiin 80-luvulla että tehoviljelystä seuraa maan eroosio ja ilmaston kuumuminen. Apinakunnan historia on yhtä aavikoitumista. Kaikki kalutaan puhtaaxi kuin murkkupesässä.
    ellauri297.html on line 577: Föds kärlekshistorier mera i krigstid?
    ellauri297.html on line 595: Flera ryska journalister tackar Kaurismäki för att ha tagit in deras tragedi i filmhistorien och för att han påminner publiken om den ukrainska aggressionen, när krigströtthet verkar breda ut sig i Europa.
    ellauri299.html on line 45: Ainut lohtu on, että tää termiittiapinoiden kupla näyttää muodostuvan erittäin lyhytaikaisexi kupruxi maailmanhistorian mittakaavassa. Darwinin vuosimiljoonan virhesijoitus kasvaa muutaman tuhannen vuoden "historian" aikana kuin pullataikina ja pilaa ympäristönsä izelleen ja syömilleen eläinystäville (sika, lammas, lehmä, kana, kala) sopimattomaxi. Eipä aikaakaan niin tääkin kupla puhkeaa, kun apinat alkaa hädissään tappaa toisiaan ja paistua ja tukehtua muutenkin kuin kärpäset. Katoovat maan pinnalta kuin dinosauruxet. No jäähän meriin sinilevät ja rannalle torakat, jotka voivat istua alas joukolla ja miettiä, mistä seuraavaxi aletaan tää kehittyminen.
    ellauri299.html on line 64: Vuoden 2003 Gunslingerin tarkistetun painoksen esipuheessa King määrittelee inspiraation lähteiksi myös Taru sormusten herrasta, Arthurian legendan ja The Good, the Bad and the Ruma. Hän tunnistaa Clint Eastwoodin "Mies ilman nimeä" -hahmon yhdeksi päähenkilön Roland Deschainin tärkeimmistä inspiroijista. Sehän oli se kaveri joka tuppukylään tultuaan painui muitta mutkitta raiskaamaan nenäkkään lutkan jossain ladossa. Kingin tyyli sarjassa sijainneille, kuten Mid-World, ja hänen ainutlaatuisen kielen (High Speech) kehittämiseen vaikuttavat myös JRR Tolkienin työt. Musta torni on vanha fantasiaukkojen aivokummitus, C.S.Lewisin ja Sauronin, ilmeinen penissymboli joka varmaan ukkeleita kauhisti ja samalla oudosti viehätti.
    ellauri299.html on line 77: Toisen lunastamani (1€) pulp-fiktion nimi on The Street Lawyer. Pultavan kaduilla on rupusakkia, New Yorkin herrahississä yhtä pahanhajuista riffraffia.
    ellauri299.html on line 87: Topol ei vaikuta kovin luotettavalta. Sivulla 9 on jo historiallinen kömmähdys. Pultavan taistelu oli Suutari Pieren ja homo-Kaarle XIIn välillä, meidän vaarilla Kaarle yhdexäisellä ei ollut siihen tappioon mitään osuutta.
    ellauri299.html on line 97: Oliver Laurence North (s. 7. lokakuuta 1943 San Antonio, Texas) on yhdysvaltalainen politiikan kommentaattori, televisiojuontaja, sotahistorioitsija, kirjailija ja entinen Yhdysvaltain merijalkaväen everstiluutnantti. Hänet tuomittiin Iran-Contra-skandaalin yhteydessä 1980-luvulla, mutta tuomiot kumottiin 1991 Bad Old Bushin päästyä presidentixi.
    ellauri299.html on line 103: Toukokuussa 2018 North valittiin National Rifle Association -kivääriyhdistyksen puheenjohtajaksi. 2019 se joutui lähtemään siitäkin veropetkutusten takia. Sitä ennen hän toimi presidentti Trumpia tukevan uutiskanava Foxin kommentaattorina. Erittäinkin paha oikeistopahis kaiken kaikkiaan.
    ellauri299.html on line 134: Kerri: Kun luin tämän kirjan ensimmäisen kerran (vuosia ja vuosia sitten), muistan lukeneeni sen kaiken yhdessä päivässä ja ajattelin: "Vau! Se oli niin voimakasta!" Luin sen vihdoin uudestaan ja se ei kestänyt. Michael on hurskas, pyhämpi kuin sinä, jolla on suuri "valkoisen miehen pelastaja" -kompleksi. Hän viittaa pyhimyksensä muutaman kerran ja siihen, kuinka häntä ei voida arvostella siitä, että hän teki niin hyvän ja jalon asian uhraamalla itsensä vähemmän onnekkaiden auttamiseksi. Ja hän aikoo pelastaa Kaikki! Hän on niin upea ja täynnä itseään. Olin iloinen, että hän lopulta osti itselleen sängyn, koska se oli vähän paljon. Hänen entiset työtoverinsa ovat nyt kaikki "pahiksia" koko kirjan ajan lähes loppuun asti, jolloin hän yhtäkkiä tuntee olonsa pahaksi, koska useimmat heistä ovat viattomia ja tietämättömiä ja se oli TODELLA VAIN Chance, joka oli pahis... Pidän siitä, että se tuo esiin vakavia kodittomuuden ahdinkoja ja että asiat eivät maagisesti muutu, elleivät kaikki ala ottamaan sitä vakavasti. (Se olisikin todella maagista...) Mutta todella, se on ainoa lunastava tekijä.
    ellauri299.html on line 148: Michael Vattenfall: Very disappointing. I would expect a Grisham book to be lighter reading, but this was totally unconvincing and lacked believability. The whole purpose of the book is based upon the transformation of the main character's view of the homeless, but I didn't buy it. Well I did, but I regret it now. Money completely wasted.
    ellauri299.html on line 154: Kristin: Chock full of white guilt and white savior narratives. This was hard to stomach.
    ellauri299.html on line 156: Anie: After 130 pages of preaching, with no plot in sight, I gave up. This book is so full of platitudes, generalizations, and simplistic solutions that it belongs in the harlequin category. There are too many good books with great plots out there to waste any more time on this book.
    ellauri299.html on line 173: Shelters are key components of America’s response to homelessness. The unsheltered population has grown yearly since 2015, amounting to a 35 percent increase over a seven-year span. In 2020, The number of people living in poverty in The U.S. of A. increased by approximately 3.3 million people. This trend continued into 2021 when nearly 41.4 million people, or 12.8 percent of the U.S. population, were counted in this group. Certain racial groups have even higher rates of poverty, including Black people (21.8 percent), American Indian and Alaska Native people (21.4 percent), and Hispanics/Latinos (17.5 percent). People living in poverty struggle to afford necessities such as housing, food, and medical care.
    ellauri299.html on line 176: In 1984, Snyder endured a fifty-one-day hunger strike to call attention to the neglect of the homeless. With his reelection a month away, President Reagan boldly announced his plans to turn the building into a model shelter for the homeless. Snyder ended his strike. Everyone was happy. After the election, Reagan went back on his promise, and all sorts of nasty litigation ensued. Snyder committed suicide on 1990.
    ellauri299.html on line 218: Tajusin sillä hetkellä, että Burtonin oikeusjuttu ei koskaan pääse niin pitkälle. Mikään täysijärkinen puolustusryhmä ei antaisi Mordecai Greenin saarnata mustalle valamiehistölle tässä (mustaenemmistöinen DC). Jos olettamuksemme olisivat oikeita ja jos voisimme todistaa ne, oikeudenkäyntiä ei koskaan tulisi.
    ellauri299.html on line 250: Arvio Lontaen menetetyistä tuloista oli melko vapaa. Puutteellisella työhistorialla tehtiin painavia oletuksia. Hän oli 22-vuotias, ja hän löytäisi jonain päivänä hyvin pian kokopäivätyön minimipalkalla. Se oli antelias oletus, mutta sen Rafter oli valmis myöntämään. Hän pysyisi puhtaana, raittiina ja vapaana raskaudesta loppuelämänsä ajan; toinen hyväntekeväisyysteoria. Hän saisi koulutusta jostain matkan varrella, muutti työhön, jossa maksetaan kaksi kertaa vähimmäispalkkaa, ja pysyisi kyseisessä työssä 65-vuotiaaksi asti. Rafter mukautti tulevia tulojaan inflaatioon ja käänsi sen nykyisiksi dollareiksi ja päätyi 570 000 dollariin Lontaen ansionmenetyksiin.
    ellauri299.html on line 256: - Se ei ole edes lähellä, Mordokai sanoi. - Saan niin paljon irti valamiehistöstä yhdestä kuolleesta lapsesta." He vajosivat istuimilleen. Hän jatkoi oikeuden häpäisyä runtaten melkein kaiken Rafterin aika pienen raportin sisällön. Hän ei välittänyt siitä, mitä tuomaristot tekivät Dallasissa tai Seattlessa, eikä hän ymmärtänyt mitä väliä sillä oli. Hän ei ollut kiinnostunut Omahan oikeudenkäynnistä. Hän tiesi, mitä hän voisi tehdä valamiehistön kanssa Districtissä, ja se oli ainoa asia. Jos heidän aikoivat ostaa tiensä halvalla, hänen on aika lähteä.
    ellauri299.html on line 266: Nippu ahneita juutalaisia lakimiehiä tuumaa että katususikoski oli näytelmän konna, varsinainen Juudas, hän ei ollut hyvä tiimipelaaja. Hänen olisi pitänyt pitää turpa kiinni ja pitää firman puolia. Just sama kuvio kuin Assangen ja muiden pilliinvislareiden kanssa, jenkkikosto elää niin kauan kuin niissä henki pihisee. Ja juuri kuten Moosexen lakitauluissa, tiiminpetturuus on pahin rikos, sitten tulee varkaus. Suurin osa läskimoosexen pykälistä koskee omaisuuden suojaa. Hyi helvetti mikä etiikka.
    ellauri299.html on line 274: Frank Lake, found 50 km southeast of Calgary near High River, Alberta, is a productive wetland important to hundreds of bird species. Once completely dry, this wetland has been saved from drainage and drought through a progressive partnership between industry, government and ourselves.
    ellauri299.html on line 310: Harmageddon täsmentyy: 3. maailmansota. Sillä mässäillään iloisesti kasaankuroutuneilla kirjakyläpäivillä, jolla myydään enää valikoituja varmoja nakkeja: kalliita 2000-luvun bestsellerkirjoja. Putinista saadaan seuraava Hitleri. Mein Kampf on historiaa, lista-arvo 150-240 euroa. Apinat tarvizevat sotia, muut vaivat helpottavat sodan aikana. Freudin nuoruuden sankari oli Hannibal. Hyppää yli Hannibal! Sano Hannixi, balit jäivät aidalle. Sotilassaapas potkaisee kernaimmin odottavan äidin mahaan. Ja eikun sinne uusi laaki tilalle. Jokainen tekee ize elämänsä, raivaa lisää Lebensraumia sisätilaan. Mixi impregnaatio vaatii niin pitkällistä pumppausta? Jotta saadaan edeltäjän mälli ulos. Sixi tekee mielikin väliin vetää pumpunmäntä täysin ulos, ja sisään taas.
    ellauri299.html on line 331: Rubin syntyi Cincinnatissa, Ohiossa, kotiäiti Estherin (Katzin) ja rekkakuski Robert Rubinin pojalle, josta tuli myöhemmin Teamsters -liiton virkamies. Hän opiskeli Oberlin Collegessa ja heprealaisessa yliopistossa Jerusalemissa ja valmistui myöhemmin Cincinnatin yliopistosta saaden historian tutkinnon. Rubin opiskeli Kalifornian yliopistossa Berkeleyssä vuonna 1964, mutta keskeytti opinnot keskittyäkseen sosiaaliseen aktivismiin.
    ellauri299.html on line 352: Sitten joku viranomainen päätti, että Pentagonin portaat oli raivattava. Kiväärin perät putosivat ihmisten päähän tylsillä, rumilla, märän kuuloisilla töksyillä. Veri roiskui portaille. Kuului huutoja "Linkitä kädet! Yhdistä kädet!" sekoitettuna kivun huutoon ja kiroukseen. Ihmisiä raahattiin ja pidätettiin. Julmuus oli kauhistuttavaa, ja portailla seisovat ihmiset alkoivat heitellä sotilaita roskilla. Näin roskakorin purjehtivan pääni yli. Food fight! Pelkäsin, että ihmiset poljettiin paniikissa, kun he yrittivät paeta pesismailoilta ja kiväärin tukeilta.
    ellauri299.html on line 360: Chicagon poliisimellakassa 1968 mätkittiin jo 1500 tyyppiä. Chicagon seizikon oikeudenkäynnistä tuli puhdasta puskafarssia. Huolimatta kaatumisvaarasta Rubin poltti marihuanaa ennen oikeudenkäyntiä. "Minua kivitettiin paljon oikeudenkäynnissä, koska se oli niin täydellistä teatteria – historian eturivin istuin – ja marihuana tehostaa jokaista kokemusta." Hölmö tuomari Hoffman lisäsi vauhtia spektaakkeliin. Tuomari Hoffman määräsi muun muassa, että Black Panther -johtaja Bobby Seale sidotaan, sidotaan ja ketjutetaan tuoliinsa huomattavan osan oikeudenkäynnistä. Olihan se hauskaa aikansa, mutta pitkässä juoxussa yrittäjyys tuo parempaa katetta, tuumi Jerry viisastuttuaan ja rupesi juppiexi. Teit'isäin astumaan.
    ellauri299.html on line 414: Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), whose current reputation rests largely on his political philosophy, was a thinker with wide-ranging interests. In philosophy, he defended a range of materialist, nominalist, and empiricist views against Cartesian and Aristotelian alternatives.
    ellauri299.html on line 415: Descartes suggested that Hobbes was more accomplished in moral philosophy than elsewhere, but also that he had wicked views there (Descartes 1643, 3.230-1). Descartes also worried that Hobbes was "aiming to make his reputation at my expense, and by devious means" (Descartes 1641b, 100).
    ellauri299.html on line 479: Vierasta lihaa, kazelin Merjaa. Toisen Hannun exä Merja ei antanut vaikka pyysin kauniisti. Nuori, nainen, ja mahdollisimman oikealta. Perkele, saatana! Tulisi sota...jotakin selvää! Merjan perse sihisi vieressäni pitkän ässän. Saatuani palkinnon piristyin niin että saatoin sujautellakin taas Merjaa. Kreetiä ja pleetiä, ketkuja ja pletkuja nää Patin työttömät työnhakijat, eli työnvälttelijät. Työnvälttelyähän se näyttää olleen tää Patin kirjailijanurakin.
    ellauri299.html on line 526: 27 percent of households – nearly double the percentage that are income poor – are living in "asset poverty." These families do not have the savings or other assets to cover basic expenses (equivalent to what could be purchased with a poverty level income) for three months if a layoff or other emergency leads to loss of income. The U.S. has the weakest social safety net of all developed nations. Sociologist Monica Prasad of Northwestern University argues that this developed because of government intervention rather than lack of it, which pushed consumer credit for meeting citizens´ needs rather than applying social welfare policies as in Europe.
    ellauri299.html on line 528: Labor market polarization has been the most severe in liberal market economies like the US, Britain, and Australia. Countries like Denmark and France have been subject to the same economic pressures, but due to their more "inclusive" (or "egalitarian") labor market institutions, such as centralized and solidaristic collective bargaining and strong minimum wage laws, they have experienced less polarization. Cross-national studies have found that European countries´ working poverty rates are much lower than the US´s. Most of this difference can be explained by the fact that European countries´ welfare states are more generous. Grisham's folks gave offerings to the church because the Bible strongly suggested it.
    ellauri299.html on line 530: Matthew Desmond, the acclaimed Princeton sociologist and author of Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City, thinks that poverty has barely improved in the United States over the past 50 years — and he has a theory why. Laid out in a long essay for the New York Times Magazine that is adapted from his forthcoming book Poverty, by America, Desmond’s theory implicates “exploitation” in the broadest sense, from a decline in unions and worker power to a proliferation of bank fees and predatory landlord practices, all of which combine to keep the American underclass down. Relative poverty in the US has stagnated in the last 40 years.
    ellauri299.html on line 556: Many [who? Marx and Engels maybe?] think that increasing the United States´ welfare state generosity would lower the working poverty rate. A common critique of this proposal is that a generous welfare state would not work because it would stagnate the economy, raise unemployment, and degrade people´s work ethic.
    ellauri300.html on line 54: Shadows on the Hudson (original title Shotns baym Hodson) is a novel by Isaac Bashevis Singer. First serialized in The Forward, a Yiddish newspaper, it was published in book form in 1957. It was translated into English by Joseph Sherman in 1998. The book follows a group of prosperous Jewish refugees in New York City following World War II, just prior to the founding of the state of Israel. This article about a 1950s novel is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
    ellauri300.html on line 89: Unessa olimme baltialaisella autolautalla tulossa Japaniin jonnekin satamaan, kenties Jokohaman kaupunkiin. Rantamyymälöissä näyttivät emättimen myyjät ohikulkeville aluxille kimonosta esiinkaivamaansa tissiä. Huomautin siitä epähuomiossa kanssa matkustaville karvakäsinaisille. Toinen kauhistui mutta toista kiinnosti. Mitähän ne maxavat se pohdiskeli. En olisi niinkään huolestunut siitä mistä niille maxetaan kuin siitä mitä niiltä saa kaupanpäällisexi, vastasin.
    ellauri300.html on line 126: Saatana saapuu Moskovaan on ajan ja paikan rajat ylittävä kaleidoskooppi jossa yhdistyvät myytti ja historia, huumori ja yhteiskunta, rakkaus ja kuolema.
    ellauri300.html on line 200: Juudas Keriothista houkutellaan kaupungin ulkopuolelle ja murhataan. Yeshuan ruumis haudataan ja Levi Matvei saapuu Herodeksen palatsiin.
    ellauri300.html on line 323: Founded in 1775 by Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi, the name "Chabad" (חב״ד‎) is an acronym formed from three Hebrew words—Chokhmah, Binah, Da'at (the first three sefirot of the kabbalistic Tree of Life) (חכמה, בינה, דעת‎): "Wisdom, Understanding, and Knowledge"—which represent the intellectual and kabbalistic underpinnings of the movement. The name Lubavitch derives from the town in which the now-dominant line of leaders resided from 1813 to 1915. Other, non-Lubavitch scions of Chabad either disappeared or merged into the Lubavitch line. In the 1930s, the sixth Rebbe of Chabad, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn, moved the center of the Chabad movement from Russia to Poland. After the outbreak of World War II, he moved the center of the movement to the United States, and there it is to this day.
    ellauri300.html on line 325: In 1951, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson formally accepted the leadership as the seventh Chabad Rebbe. He transformed the movement into one of the most widespread Jewish movements in the world today. Under his leadership, Chabad established a large network of institutions that seek to satisfy religious, social and humanitarian needs across the world. Chabad institutions provide outreach to unaffiliated Jews and humanitarian aid, as well as religious, cultural and educational activities. Prior to his death in 1994, Schneerson was believed by some of his followers to be the Messiah, with his own position on the matter debated among scholars. Messianic ideology in Chabad sparked controversy in various Jewish communities and is still an unresolved matter. Following his death, no successor was appointed as a new central leader.
    ellauri300.html on line 332: "Vallankumouksellinen" ajatus tyttöjen muodollisesta koulutuksesta tuotiin varovasti ja innokkaasti Toora-yhteiskuntaan 1930-luvulla, eikä ilman vastustusta. Lubavitchissa edellinen Rebbe kuitenkin otti konseptin innostuneesti vastaan ja tuki sitä. Sitten vuonna 1941 Rebbe saapui Yhdysvaltoihin, jolloin "juutalaisen koulutuksen keskusjärjestö" (Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch) syntyi. Rebben nimitti sen johtajaksi hänen appensa (edellinen Rebbe), ja yksi ensimmäisistä Merkosin perustamista instituutioista oli Beth Rivkahin tyttökoulu. Mutta mitä iloa on tästä hasiditytölle? No paljonkin!
    ellauri300.html on line 362: Kun olemme syöneet marorin, yrttejä käytetään vielä kerran niin sanotussa korechissa, voileipässä, joka koostuu matzasta ja marorista. 23 Ymmärtääksemme miksi teemme näin, on tarpeen selittää hetki rabbien välistä kiistaa siitä, kuinka pääsiäislammasta, matzaa ja maroria syötiin temppelin seisoessa. Suurin osa rabbeista oli sitä mieltä, että jokainen syötiin erikseen. Hillel kuitenkin katsoi, että näistä kolmesta tehdään voileipä ja syödään ne yhdessä. Täyttääksemme kaikki mielipiteet teemme molemmat. Syömme ensin matsan ja marorin erikseen, ja sitten syömme ne yhdessä korech- voileipänä.
    ellauri300.html on line 364: Tämä tehdään seuraavasti: Ensin otetaan kezayit matzahista ja leikataan se kahtia, jolloin muodostuu kaksi osaa voileipää (jos sinulla on Seder-lautanen, käytä tähän kolmatta matzahia 24). Ota seuraavaksi kezayit maroria ja aseta se kahden matzah-viipaleen väliin. Käytä tällä kertaa chazeretia, lähimpänä olevaa maror- kasaa Seder-levyllä.
    ellauri300.html on line 366: Halachahissa käydään keskustelua siitä, kastetaanko maror uudelleen charosetiin vai ei. Chabadin tapana on kastaa, mutta niiden, jotka varovat laittamasta kosteutta matzahiinsa, tulisi sen sijaan laittaa pieni pala viinitöntä charosettia marorille. 25
    ellauri300.html on line 374: Tämän selittämiseksi on tarpeen käyttää hetki Seder-yön analysointiin – ja aloittaa polku kohti syvällisempää marorin ymmärtämistä. Ulkoisesti Seder näyttää jakautuneen kahteen erilliseen osaan. Ensin kokoamme perheemme yhteen ja kerromme tarinan ajastamme Egyptissä, eläen jälleen kerran yhden historiamme tärkeimmistä luvuista. Sitten kun se on tehty, palaamme nykyhetkeen ja täytämme yön fyysiset mitsat – syömme matzaa ja maroria. Näillä kahdella osalla näyttää olevan vähän yhteyttä toisiinsa.
    ellauri300.html on line 407: Boris hade också bekostat en översättning av dr Halperins nya bok, Asketism och ande, där Halperin redogjorde för sina tankar på ålderns höst - en ny syn på filosofins historia visade hur alla filosofer, från Thales till Bergson, från Husserl till Vaihinger och även epikuréerna, hade predikat asketism. Det var alldeles fel! Alltid hade filosofin försökt förneka livet, och detta var anledningen till att den misslyckades. I sin strävan mot en illusion av evigheten hade filosofin förbisett det sanna värdet av det förgängliga. Ett stort förlag i New York övervägde nu att skriva kontrakt med Halperin som försäkrade att hans lycka skulle vända och stjälpa vedertagna filosofiska tolkningar. Zadok Halperin som hittills bara var känd i en snäv cirkel av akademiker skulle bli världsberömd liksom Peter Schwartz (writer).
    ellauri300.html on line 410:

    This Will Be The Day That I Die


    ellauri300.html on line 417: Jasiå, hon var ambitiös. Hade hon förverkligat sina egna ambitioner? Den här boken kostade fem cent. Och vad fanns det mer för böcker? En som handlade om Ohios järnvägshistoria, en annan som handlade om hur man lyckas i kärlek och arbete. Den kanske vore något för mig, Ja, hur lyckas man egentligen? Boken kostade
    ellauri300.html on line 439: When I read about his widowed bride
    ellauri300.html on line 446: And them good ole boys were drinking whiskey and rye
    ellauri300.html on line 447: Singin' this'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 448: This'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 470: And them good ole boys were drinking whiskey and rye
    ellauri300.html on line 471: Singin' this'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 472: This'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 483: The jester stole his thorny crown
    ellauri300.html on line 495: Them good ole boys were drinking whiskey and rye
    ellauri300.html on line 496: And singin' this'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 497: This'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 520: Them good ole boys were drinking whiskey and rye
    ellauri300.html on line 521: And singin' this'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 522: This'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 545: Them good ole boys were drinking whiskey and rye
    ellauri300.html on line 546: Singin' this'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 547: This'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 570: And them good ole boys were drinking whiskey and rye
    ellauri300.html on line 571: Singin' this'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 572: This'll be the day that I die
    ellauri300.html on line 577: Them good ole boys were drinking whiskey and rye
    ellauri300.html on line 578: Singin' this'll be the day that I die.
    ellauri300.html on line 585: Facets of his 1971 song "American Pie" have become part of American culture, spanning generations. McLean's lyrics retroactively influenced the perception of a major event in the early days of rock 'n roll.
    ellauri300.html on line 589: In October 2022, McLean called Kanye West an 'attention-seeking fool' over his antisemitic rants. The "American Pie" singer who briefly lived in Israel said he stands with his Jewish friends. McLean lived in Israel on-and-off from 1978-1982 and he “grew to love the country and the people. Living there changed my life forever.”
    ellauri300.html on line 591: McLean was raised in the Catholic faith of his mother, Elizabeth McLean; his father, Donald McLean, was a Protestant. His father died when McLean was 15. McLean grew up in a physically abusive household, and was abused by both his parents and his sister. His second marriage was to Patrisha Shnier McLean, of Montreal, Canada, from 1987 to 2016. They have two children, Jackie and Wyatt, and two grandchildren, Rosa and Mya. In 2018, McLean confirmed his romantic relationship with model and reality star Paris Dylan, who is 48 years his junior. McLean sang a duet of his song "Vincent" with Ed Sheeran.
    ellauri300.html on line 593: On January 18, 2016, McLean's then-wife Patrisha Shnier McLean alleged that after four hours of "terrorizing" her, McLean pinned her to a bed until she broke free and ran to the bathroom. Shnier McLean alleged that McLean attempted "to shove open the locked bathroom door behind which I had barricaded myself. As it was splintering, I pushed the numbers 911." McLean was arrested on suspicion of domestic violence, and pled guilty to domestic violence assault, criminal restraint, criminal mischief and making domestic violence threats. McLean paid $3,660 in fines, and was not sentenced to any jail time. Under Maine's deferred disposition law, the State agreed to dismiss the domestic violence assault charge if McLean complied with the court's orders for one year, and the charge was expunged a year later. During this time, Shnier McLean filed for divorce, citing “adultery, cruel and abusive treatment, and irreconcilable differences." McLean has denied that he physically abused Shnier McLean, and his lawyer released a statement claiming McLean agreed to the plea deal in the interest of privacy. In March 2017, a Maine court granted Shnier-McLean's request for a 10-year protection order against McLean. In 2021, McLean's daughter Jackie told Rolling Stone that her father was emotionally abusive and created a cult-like household through paralyzing verbal attacks, forced isolation, and threats to withhold love or financial support.
    ellauri300.html on line 595: The article asserted that "texts, emails and recordings of calls between McLean and her father provided to Rolling Stone suggest a pattern of asserting control and manipulation over Jackie, her actions and memories, and a seeming drive by the elder McLean to maintain a certain public image." In one email, McLean wrote his daughter, “unless you support me publicly and frequently you should not expect me to lift a finger for you nor will I give you another red cent.”
    ellauri300.html on line 636: Titus was one of at least two younger men that Paul disciplined and described as his “sons in the faith that we share” (Titus 1:4). The other man is Timothy, and the second letter to the Corinthians is addressed as from Paul and Timothy to the church in Corinth (2 Corinthians 1:1). Both Timothy and Titus served as Paul’s messengers and traveling companions, and they both went on to lead churches. Paul not only mentored them, but he also advised them in individual letters about their next steps. Matin stepit.
    ellauri300.html on line 638: Titus’ background is not explained, other than the fact he was Gentile and apparently never circumcised (Paul had checked, Galatians 2:4). This is an interesting point, since Timothy was half-Greek, and not circumcised either! Still, Paul chose to circumcise Timothy to honor the Jews in an area that the two of them were ministering in (Acts 16:1-5). Paul repeatedly mentions in his letters that circumcision is not necessary under the new covenant (though great fun), and even tells Titus to silence Christians who try to promote it (Titus 1:10-14). So, Paul’s choice to circumcise Timothy would suggest that he had a pragmatic thorn in his side. He did not require his disciples to be circumcised, but if the situation called for working among Jews and it made things easier, he would gladly do it. Whether Titus ever ministered to Jewish believers is not stated, and both he and Titus worked at churches in Gentile areas (Timothy in Ephesus, Titus in Crete, and Corinth and Dalmatia).
    ellauri300.html on line 812: Helt säkert blev det här en sedelärande historia som barn och ungdomar fick höra många år framåt: "Passa er noga för att ge er på någon gudsman. Kom ihåg hur det gick för pojkarna från Betel!"
    ellauri300.html on line 819: Remember Jeroboam founded Dan (in the north) and Bethel (in the south) as his kingdom’s two alternatives to Jerusalem (1 Kings 12:25-33). He set up golden calves at these sites, ordained non-Aaronic priests, changed the time of the festivals, and Ba'al worship soon reigned supreme.
    ellauri300.html on line 821: Bethel was basically one big uplifted middle finger to everything Moses had commanded. When God’s prophet approached this irritating city, the young men (bloody servants!) mocked him, saying, “Go up, you baldhead! Go up, you baldhead!” Not only were they ridiculing his lack of hair (which, in the Old Testament, was often associated with a skin disease), they were telling him to fly away, like his predecessor Elijah. Keep in mind that, right before this, Elijah had supposedly “gone up” to heaven in a fiery chariot (2 Kings 2).
    ellauri300.html on line 824: Bears may play a significant role here, but the real animal in this overarching story is a serpent. His slithering and slandering tongue was inside the mouths of these mockers. The god whom they served, Baal, was just a mask for Satan. Good riddance, in a word, for bad rubbish.
    ellauri300.html on line 831: We hope you enjoyed this article. Today is Giving Tuesday, an international day of giving, and we are asking our readers to support our ministry.
    ellauri300.html on line 849: At the hour of the afternoon sacrifice the prophet Elijah approached the altar and prayed, “O Lord, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, prove now that you are the God of Israel and that I am your servant and have done all this at your command.
    ellauri300.html on line 850: The Lord sent fire down, and it burned up the sacrifice, the wood, and the stones, scorched the earth and dried up the water in the trench. 39 When the people saw this, they threw themselves on the ground and exclaimed, “The Lord is God; the Lord alone is God!”
    ellauri300.html on line 852: And then (this is The Part I like) Elijah ordered, “Seize the prophets of Baal; don't let any of them get away!” The people seized them all, and Elijah led them down to Kishon Brook and killed them, all 950 of them.
    ellauri300.html on line 880: Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of their own property. 2 With his wife’s full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles’ feet.
    ellauri300.html on line 882: 5 When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened. 6 Then some young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried him out and buried him.
    ellauri300.html on line 883: 7 About three hours later his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. 8 Peter asked her, “Tell me, is this the price you and Ananias got for the land?”
    ellauri300.html on line 886: 10 At that moment she fell down at his feet and died. Then the young men came in and, finding her dead, carried her out and buried her beside her husband. 11 Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events.
    ellauri300.html on line 923: So Elisha, as a prophet, saw their hardened and rebellious condition, unresponsive to correction. In the name of the Lord (i.e. by His authority) Elisha simply turned them over to the Lord and to their own devices, which had the effect of removing them from even the common protection of God. He probably said something like, “may God deal with you according to what you deserve,” or “may you be cursed for your sins of rebellion.” This would demonstrate to the city and to people all around a vital truth: without the Lord there is no protection and that blasphemy of God’s servants and His Word in order to hinder God’s message is serious busin
    ellauri301.html on line 84: The continent became a second home to him, and he spent a great deal of his life there after his success made it possible, founding and then running a theatre in Mozambique from 1986 onwards.
    ellauri301.html on line 90: Henning Mankell is credited for being the first author of Scandinavian crime thrillers to reach an international audience (although he has credited Maj Sjowall and Per Wahloo for his own inspiration).
    ellauri301.html on line 96: A grumpy, disillusioned, diabetic alcoholic with just enough goodness at his core to fire his desire to catch murderers, Wallander appears in 13 novels and is responsible for the majority of Mankell’s worldwide sales of more than 40 million books. The murders he investigated epitomised the slow decline Mankell detected in Swedish society. As well as the racism that appalled him there was rising unemployment and violent crime, corruption, the rigidity of a patriarchy forged in Lutheran religion and the relentless breakdown of communities and society.
    ellauri301.html on line 100: The extraordinary global success of Swedish and later Norwegian crime fiction as a form of escapist literature for men had several causes. One is that police work is one of the last wholly unionised jobs in the world, so that our hero will never be sacked for anything other than gross misconduct – of which he, being the hero, is never really guilty. In the optimistic 60s, James Bond was distinguished from other middle-aged men by his licence to kill but by the 90s the policeman as a fantasy hero had a licence to keep his job. In the economic whirlwind of globalisation, this was something that a lot of frustrated middle-aged men could only dream of.
    ellauri301.html on line 111: Preview: The first Wallander novel Mördare utan ansikte (‘Faceless Killers’) was published in Sweden in 1991 and begins with an elderly couple being attacked in a remote farmhouse. The husband dies instantly, the wife lives long enough to whisper the word “foreign”, triggering a wave of violent racism as Wallander seeks to solve the crime.
    ellauri301.html on line 140: Young Wallander is a crime drama streaming television series, based on Henning Mankell's fictional Inspector Kurt Wallander. The series premiered on Netflix on September 3, 2020. Star Adam Pålsson explained that the pre-imagining (i.e., Young Wallander being set in the present day) made more sense than a straight prequel as it allowed for the social commentary which is a strong element of Mankell's original Wallander. This choice of setting the series in the modern day has been criticised by old farts in a number of reviews.
    ellauri301.html on line 144: Young Wallander is a young, edgy, and modern series that sees Henning Mankell's iconic detective Kurt Wallander investigate his gripping first case. The story focuses on the formative experiences – professional and personal – faced by Kurt as a recently graduated police officer in his early twenties. Including frequent fornication with an unrealistically pretty immigrant charity worker.
    ellauri301.html on line 152: Mahtipontisen buuripriikvelin jälkeen siirrytään Ystadiin. Ystad on samannimisen Ystadin kunnan keskustaajama. Se sijaitsee Skånen läänissä ja Skånen historiallisessa maakunnassa Etelä-Ruotsissa. Vuoden 2010 lopussa taajamassa oli 18 350 asukasta. Sen kokoinen oli Sysmä 70-luvulla. Nyt jäljellä on enää neljännes. Skånen nuorten miesten salaseuran pitäisi vapauttaa Ystad ruozalaisten vallasta. Itähämäläisten tulis ajaa etelän mökkiläiset huut helkkariin.
    ellauri301.html on line 157: Wallander was once married, but his wife Mona (remember? the immigrant charity dish) left him and he has since had a difficult relationship with his rebellious only child, Linda, who barely survived a suicide attempt when she was fifteen. He also had issues with his late father, an artist who painted the same landscape 7,000 times for a living; the elder Wallander strongly disapproved of his son´s decision to join the police force and frequently derided him for it. Fair enough: painting sunsets with/without a black grouse pays off better than finding random middle fingers of color. Kurt Wallander sr is a great fan of the opera. Kurt Wallander jr says he actually hates opera. I bet that was a joke.
    ellauri301.html on line 172: Mankelin äiti teki itsemurhan Mankelin ollessa vähän alle 30-vuotias. Mankellin mukaan äidin puuttuminen ei juurikaan vaivannut häntä, sillä hänellä oli hyvä ja läheinen suhde isäänsä, joka ei maalannut teeriä. Hän oli kuitenkin yksinäinen lapsi, sillä hänen sisaruksensa viihtyivät keskenään, mutteivät jostain syystä Henningin parissa, Henning oli paljon omissa oloissaan. Myöhemmin perhe muutti vielä Boråsiin ilman äitiä. Ei ollut helppoa. Mankell vietti nuoruutensa pienessä Svegin kauppalassa Norjan rajalla. Lukio jäi kesken, Henning oli 2v seilorina muttei päässyt brittejä edemmäs. Sitten se korjasi Pariisissa saxofoneja. After returning from Paris he had taken part in the 1968 demonstrations in Stockholm against the Vietnam war and the university system, and spent much of the 70s in Norway on the fringe of a Maoist group to which his (nameless) then-partner belonged. Oliko se partneri mars- vai venustyyppinen?
    ellauri301.html on line 184: Suomalainen Kosti Kalke julkaisi 1898 kirjasen Herätyssanoja ynnä lyhyt armonjärjestys: kirjoittajan kuvalla. Konstantin (Kosti) Kalke (5. joulukuuta 1858 Koski Hl – 2. helmikuuta 1938 Tohmajärvi) oli suomalainen kirkkoherra ja paikallishistoriasta sekä uskonnollisista aiheista kirjoittanut kirjailija.
    ellauri301.html on line 197: Väinö oli 220cm pitkä ja painoi painavimmillaan 160 kiloa. Käden alla taidevoimistelija V. Bergström, joka ei ole Koskelta. Hämeenkoskella Siltalaa pidetään tunnettuna. Vuoden 2009 kuntaidentiteettiselvityksessä Siltala listattiin yhdeksi historian tärkeimmistä henkilöistä.
    ellauri301.html on line 234: She was taken in as a companion and as a servant to Riebeeck´s wife and children. However, many authors and historians speculate that she most likely lived in a sexually abusive space, based on the fondness Van Riebeek showed for her in his journals.
    ellauri301.html on line 236: Circumstantial evidence supports the theory that at the time of the Dutch arrival, the girl was living with her uncle Autshumato (also known as Harry by the Dutch), the circumstantial evidence being that she showed consistent hostility to the !Uriǁ’aekua and, by association, to her own mother, who lived with them. In contrast Krotoa´s fate and fortunes were closely aligned to those of her uncle Autshumato and to his clan known as the !Uriǁ´aeǀona. The ǃUriǁ´aeǀona (rendered in Dutch as "Goringhaicona") people who were sedentary, non-pastoral hunter-gatherers are believed to be one of the first clans to make acquaintance with the Dutch people. Prior to the Dutch´s arrival Autshumato served as a postal agent for passing ships of a number of countries. If the theory of !Oroǀõas having lived with her uncle is true, then her early service to the VOC may not have been as violent a transition as it was made out to be.
    ellauri301.html on line 238: On 3 May 1662 she was baptized by a visiting person, minister Jean Sibelius, in the church inside the Fort de Goede Hoop. The witnesses were Roelof de Man and Pieter van der Stael. On 26 April 1664 she married a Danish surgeon by the name of Peter Havgard, whom the Dutch called Pieter van Meerhof. She was there after known as Eva van Meerhof (See Geni/MyHeritage).[clarification needed] She was the first Khoikoi to marry according to Christian customs. There was a little party in the house of Zacharias Wagenaer. In May 1665, they left to the Cape and went to Robben Island, where van Meerhof was appointed superintendent. The family briefly returned to the mainland in 1666 after the birth of Eva´s third child, in order to baptise the baby. Van Meerhof was murdered in Madagascar on 27 February 1668 on an expedition. After the death of her husband Pieter Van Meerhof came the appointment of a new governor, Zacharias Wagenaer. Unlike the governor before him, he held extremely negative views toward the Khoi people, and because at this point the Dutch settlement was secure, he didn´t find a need for Eva as a translator anymore.
    ellauri301.html on line 240: She returned to the mainland on 30 September 1668 with her three children. Suffering from alcoholism, she left the Castle in the settlement to be with her family in their kraals. In February 1669 she was imprisoned unjustly for immoral behavior at the Castle and then banished to Robben Island. This was likely the result of the strict anti-alcohol laws the VOC had passed to govern the local population after they introduced higher proof European liquors. One of Van Riebeeck´s nieces, Elizabeth Van Opdorp, adopted Krotoa´s children after she was banished. She returned to the mainland on many occasions, only to find herself once more banished to Robben Island. In May 1673 she was allowed to baptise a child on the mainland. Three of her children survived. She died 31 years old on 29 July 1674 in the Cape and was buried on 30 September 1674 in the Castle in the Fort. However, roughly a hundred years later, her bones were removed to an unmarked grave.
    ellauri301.html on line 242: On 3 May 1662 she was baptized by a visiting person, minister Petrus Sibelius, in the church inside the Fort de Goede Hoop. The witnesses were Roelof de Man and Pieter van der Stael. On 26 April 1664 she married a Danish surgeon by the name of Peter Havgard, whom the Dutch called Pieter van Meerhof. She was thereafter known as Eva van Meerhof (See Geni/MyHeritage).[clarification needed] She was the first Khoikoi to marry according to Christian customs. There was a little party in the house of Zacharias Wagenaer. In May 1665, they left to the Cape and went to Robben Island, where van Meerhof was appointed superintendent. The family briefly returned to the mainland in 1666 after the birth of Eva´s third child, in order to baptise the baby. Van Meerhof was murdered in Madagascar on 27 February 1668 on an expedition. After the death of her husband Pieter Van Meerhof came the appointment of a new governor, Zacharias Wagenaer. Unlike the governor before him, he held extremely negative views toward the Khoi people, and because at this point the Dutch settlement was secure, he didn´t find a need for Eva as a translator anymore.
    ellauri301.html on line 244: She returned to the mainland on 30 September 1668 with her three children. Suffering from alcoholism, she left the Castle in the settlement to be with her family in their kraals. In February 1669 she was imprisoned unjustly for immoral behavior at the Castle and then banished to Robben Island. This was likely the result of the strict anti-alcohol laws the VOC had passed to govern the local population after they introduced higher proof European liquors. One of Van Riebeeck´s nieces, Elizabeth Van Opdorp, adopted Krotoa´s children after she was banished. She returned to the mainland on many occasions, only to find herself once more banished to Robben Island. In May 1673 she was allowed to baptise a child on the mainland. Three of her children survived. She died on 29 July 1674 in the Cape and was buried on 30 September 1674 in the Castle in the Fort. However, roughly a hundred years later, her bones were removed to an unmarked grave.
    ellauri301.html on line 246: Krotoa´s descendants would later include the Peltzers, the Krugers, the Steenkamps and other Afrikaner families. After her death, Krotoa´s story would not be deeply explored for nearly two and a half centuries. Instead attention was mostly put on white European women who came to South Africa on missionary expeditions. It was not until after the 1920s that her story become a part of South African history. As late as 1983, under the name of Eva, she was still known in South Africa as a caution against miscegenation.
    ellauri301.html on line 250: Frederik Willem de Klerk (/də ˈklɜːrk, də ˈklɛərk/, Afrikaans: [ˈfriədərək ˈvələm də ˈklɛrk], 18 March 1936 – 11 November 2021) was a South African politician who served as state president of South Africa from 1989 to 1994 and as deputy president from 1994 to 1996 in the democratic government. As South Africa´s last head of state from the era of white-minority rule, he and his government dismantled the apartheid system and introduced universal suffrage. Ideologically a conservative and an economic liberal, he led the National Party (NP) from 1989 to 1997.
    ellauri301.html on line 254: Amid this violence, the state security forces committed widespread human rights abuses and encouraged violence between the Xhosa and Zulu people, although de Klerk later denied sanctioning such actions. He permitted anti-apartheid marches to take place, legalised a range of previously banned anti-apartheid political parties, and freed imprisoned anti-apartheid activists such as Nelson Mandela. He also dismantled South Africa´s nuclear weapons program.
    ellauri301.html on line 256: De Klerk became Deputy President in Mandela´s ANC-led coalition, the Government of National Unity. In this position, he supported the government´s continued liberal economic policies but opposed the Truth and Reconciliation Commission set up to investigate past human rights abuses because he wanted total amnesty for political crimes. His working relationship with Mandela was strained, although he later spoke fondly of him, when the coon finally died 2013. De Clerck ize kuoli viime vuonna eli 2021.
    ellauri301.html on line 261: De Klerk was a heavy smoker but gave up smoking towards the end of 2005. He also enjoyed a glass of whisky or wine while relaxing his muscles. He enjoyed playing golf and big game hunting, as well as going for brisk walks.
    ellauri301.html on line 282: Henning kertoo videohaastattelussa nuoren Wallenbergin kuuloisella enkulla eze kazoi yhteiskunnan onkelmia skouden ja rofen näkökulmasta. Sen kirjat on kuin kreikkalaisia vuohisaarnoja, jotka oli krimisarjoja, joista vain skoudet puuttuivat. Eli kyllä krimit on yhtä hienoja kuin muutkin romaanit, leuka pystyyn vaan. Poliisit ois niikö Euripideen kuoro ja Wallenberg kuoronjohtaja. Mankelin sukulaiset soitti urkuja, Henningin instrumentixi tuli näppis, koska viulistina se oli second rate. My responsibility is to react. Yours is to buy and read.
    ellauri301.html on line 296: Terde spent three years in a Rooigrond prison for assaulting a petrol station attendant and for the attempted murder of a Black security guard around 1996. He was released in June 2004. On 3 April 2010, he was hacked and beaten to death on his Ventersdorp farm, allegedly by two of his employees in a dispute over unpaid wages.
    ellauri301.html on line 333: A braai is about being South African. What makes a braai truly South African are the traditions that have become common practise in a vast majority of households in this beautiful country. It is so much more than just the cooking of food but also the gathering of friends and loved ones. The atmosphere and VIBE of the braai is what makes it such a special event for all South Africans, black, white and yaller!
    ellauri301.html on line 347: TIDBIT: There are many initiatives surrounding this day that have received endorsement. There is even an official song “Our Heritage” recorded by The Soweto Gospel Choir.
    ellauri301.html on line 349: Heritage Day on September 24 is a day that celebrates South Africa’s roots, their rich, vibrant, and diverse cultures. South Africa is called the ‘‘Rainbow Nation’’ due to its color and gender diversity, and this is why Heritage Day exists. Its goal is to nurture and embrace South African culture for what it truly is, accepting all races and genders. The day is usually celebrated with a cookout known as a braai and we suggest that you channel your inner South African and celebrate with a feast of your own.
    ellauri301.html on line 352: September 24 was previously known in South Africa as Shaka Day, a day commemorating the Zulu King of Shaka. He was known for uniting the Zulu clan together and forming the Zulu nation. Every year, South Africans would gather at his grave to honor him. In 1995 a request for the day to be confirmed as an official braai holiday was rejected. After receiving some pushback from the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), a majority Zulu party, it was decided that the day was needed and would be known as ‘‘Heritage Day.’’
    ellauri301.html on line 376: Kesällä 1994 ruotsalaiset ovat liimautuneet television ääreen katsomaan jalkapallon MM-kisoja. Juhannus lähestyy, mutta komisario Kurt Wallanderille juhlasta on tulossa painajainen. Poliisiasemalle tulee puhelu tytöstä, joka on seissyt tuntikausia keskellä peltoa Ystadin lähistöllä. Kun Wallander saapuu paikalle, tyttö sytyttää itsensä tuleen. Parin päivän päästä paikalta löydetään entisen oikeusministerin skalpeerattu ruumis. Wallander on keskellä uransa monimutkaisinta juttua, sillä johtolanka toisensa jälkeen vie hänet väärille jäljille. Ja ennennäkemättömän julma murhaaja iskee yhä uudestaan... Saakurin tyhmä poliisi.
    ellauri301.html on line 411: Likainen enkeli on tositapahtumiin perustuva romaani salaperäisestä ruotsalaisnaisesta, joka piti ilotaloa 1900-luvun alun Afrikassa. Hun minnes sin fars siste ord: "En fattig engel. Det er hva du er." Ett år senere er hun eier at en av de største bordellene i hovedstaden i den portugisiske kolonien Mozambique. Plutselig har hun fått en maktposisjon, fra å ha vært en fattig engel er hun blitt den skitne engelen. Noen år senere forsvinner hun sporløst ut av historien, just liksom Kari Eidsvold. Huom! Ei ilmeisesti ole dekkari, mutta varmasti himputin mielenkiintoinen romaani kuitenkin. En ole kyllä lukenut.
    ellauri301.html on line 499: Allra bäst i mina ögon är hans behandling av det religiösa. På denna punkt skänker han oss faktiskt en bättre förståelse än den som ges av vissa historiker, som omöjligt kan göra sig fria från sin modernt-sekulära världsbild och som därför bara kan se forna tiders gudstro som kod för något annat: opium för folket etc. Här finns det religiösa med hela tiden, i allt. Det är en sällsam värld fylld av tecken, signerier och underverk, och den är skildrad med en inlevelse, ja värme.
    ellauri301.html on line 502: Frågan är: känns den här bilden av 1100-talet och dess människor trovärdig? Svaret är nå ja, eller rättare sagt nej för helvete. Det låter som Connecticut Yankee i King Arthurs hov. Följdfrågan blir: är den intressant? Svaret blir igen nå ja, gäsp, definitivt. Men då svarar man inte längre som historiker utan som en människa uppväxt i det 20:e seklet som har sett tusentals likadana kostymhistorier såsom Peter Englund (2015). Arnin haaskalle palaan albumissa 387.
    ellauri301.html on line 517: No truth to it. Doesn't exist. There's no "there" there. A complete fiction. SOURCE: Stutchkoff, Der Oytser fun der Yidisher Shprakh. The first phrase is in Hebrew and usually stands alone. It is followed by a tongue-in-cheek paraphrase in Yiddish. Refers to a commentary on the story in 2 Kings 2:23-24, in which Elisha's curse called two bears out of a forest to attack youths who had mocked him. According to Rashi, this was a double miracle because there existed in the area neither forest nor bears. Variation:
    ellauri301.html on line 583: -No ei, sano Vikki. Kum mailmahan olis naas muuttunu hyväks. Kukaan ei haastas riitaa eikä ränkyttäs turhista. Aijäkin sanos muijastaan että: "Se on ny ollu nin kovasti herttasella päällä. Kun sillon noi vaihrevuaret."
    ellauri302.html on line 66: Mrs. Warren cherishes no delusions about her dubious profession, — If Yekel and his wife (in Ash's play) are not so enlightened as Mrs. Warren in their views upon the traffic off which they live, they are in their own crude way equally sincere in beholding in it a business quite as legitimate as any other. With the same inconsistency with which Hindel implores Heaven for aid in achieving her nefarious aims, after which she promises to be a model wife and mother (See Act Two), Mrs. Warren at the end of Shaw's play swears by Heaven that henceforth she will lead a life of evil fornication.
    ellauri302.html on line 68: Regrettably, however, 'The God of Vengeance," despite conclusions too easily drawn, is not a sex play. When Ash wishes to deal with sex as sex he is not afraid to handle the subject with all the poetry and power at his command. Such a play as his "Jephthah's Daughter" treats the elemental urge of sex with daring, beauty and Dionysiac abandon. A lurid reader is referred to this other play. This one is bound to be a disappointment.
    ellauri302.html on line 69: Also, in his powerful novel ''Mottke the Vagabond," Ash has given us scenes from the underworld of Warsaw that are unparalleled for unflinching truth to detail.
    ellauri302.html on line 79: SARAH, his wife; formerly a prostitute.
    ellauri302.html on line 117: "Setä" on ilmetty Tevje: He is a tall, strong man of about forty, stout; swarthy countenance, covered all over with dark hair; his black heard cut round. He speaks in loud, gruff tones, at the same time making coarse gestures and grasping the lapel of the man whom he happens to he addressing. Despite this, his face and person heam with a certain frank geniality.
    ellauri302.html on line 120: Do they think they'll soil their pedigree by coming to you? And when they need to borrow a hundred-rouble note... or take a charity contribution... they're not at all ashamed of your company then... The goy is treif, but his money's kosher.
    ellauri302.html on line 125: Daddy jakaa rahaa ja Mommy sämpylöitä köyhille. Rifkele saa rahaa tanssitossuihin. Köyhät ylistävät Rifkelen siveyttä. Mutta annas olla! Daddy ja Mommy nahistelevat:
    ellauri302.html on line 131: ''Who you are!" What! Have you stolen anything? You have a business. Everybody has his own business. You don't compel anybody, do you? You may deal in what you please, can't you, if you yourself do no wrong?... Just try to give them some money, and see whether they'll take it from you or not!
    ellauri302.html on line 139: Don't climb too high, Sarah. Do you hear? Not too high... For if you do, some fine day you'll fall and break your neck. (Shakes a warning finger at her.) And don't try to break into the upper crust. Don't, I tell you. You've a home of your own, — stay there. You've got bread, — eat. But don't intrude where you're not wanted... Every dog must know his own kennel. Here at least it is all cash on delivery. Upstairs is kosher, downstairs is treif. Keep them separate, is all I say.
    ellauri302.html on line 152: The Scribe (proffering his hand to Yekel, at the same time surveying him suspiciously): Greetings. Peace be to you, fellow Jew.
    ellauri302.html on line 154: The Scribe, gives his hand to Yekel. Your health, host. (Admonishing him.) And know, that a Holy Scroll is a wondrous possession. The whole world rests upon a Scroll of the Law, and every Scroll is the exact counterpart of the tablets that were received by Moses upon Mount Sinai. Every line of a Holy Scroll is penned in purity and piety... Where dwells a Scroll, in such a house dwells God himself... So it must be guarded against every impurity... Man, you must know that a Holy Scroll...
    ellauri302.html on line 156: You must have reverence for a Scroll of the Law. Great reverence, — precisely as if a noted Rabbi were under your roof. In the house where it resides no profanity must be uttered. It must dwell amidst purity. (Speaks to Sarah, looking toward her hut not directly at her) Wherever a Holy Scroll is sheltered, there no woman must remove the wig from her head... (Sarah thrusts her hair more securely under her wig.) Nor must she touch the Scroll with her bare... hands. As a reward, no evil overtakes the home that shelters a Scroll. Such a home will always be prosperous and guarded against all misfortune. (To the Scribe.) What do you imagine? — That he doesn't know all this? They're Jews, after all... (Sarah nods affirmatively.)
    ellauri302.html on line 160: Reb Ali (shutting up Yekele): That is, you will present the Holy Scroll as a wedding-gift to your son-in-law. That's the idea, isn't it? (To the Scribe.) Do you see, Reb Aaron, there are still pious Jews in the world ; here 's a man with a daughter, and has a Scroll of the Law written for her future husband... How beautiful that is, — how virtuous... I tell you, Reb Aaron, that the spirit of Israel, the Jewish spark... the... ahem... ah!.. ah!... (Smacking his lips.)
    ellauri302.html on line 165: Pause.) I've really been thinking about it, and have a certain fellow in view, — a jewel of a chap, — smart head on his shoulders... his father is a highly respected man. (Abruptly.) Are you going to give your daughter a large dowry?
    ellauri302.html on line 203: Yekel, his face still hetrays signs of his cunning and of his youthful dissipation. He is dressed in dignified, orthodox fashion. Removes his hat and shakes the rain from it.
    ellauri302.html on line 205: A fine business! It has to rain! (Suddenly noticing Rifkele, he explodes with rage.) What! You here! (Seizes her hy the collar and shakes her, clinching his teeth.) What are you doing here?
    ellauri302.html on line 216: Shloyme: There's a virtuous Yekel for you! It doesn't become his dignity for his daughter to be a professional. (Through the ceiling is heard a noise of angry stamping, and the weeping of a woman.) He must be giving it to his wife now, all right! Biff! Bang!
    ellauri302.html on line 223: What a sweet odor the rain has!... (Shaking raindrops off her clothes.) Just like the apples at home drying, in the lofts. This is the first May rain.
    ellauri302.html on line 229: At home, in my village, the first sorrel must be sprouting. Yes, at the first May rain they cook sorrel soup... And the goats must be grazing in the meadows... And the rafts must be floating on the stream... And Franek is getting the Gentile girls together, and dancing with them at the inn... And the women must surely be baking cheese-cakes for the Feast of Weeks.* (Silence.) Do you know what? I'm going to buy myself a new summer tippet and go home for the holidays... (Buns into her room, brings out a large summer hat and a long veil; she places the hat upon her wet hair and surveys herself in the looking-glass.) Just see! If I'd ever come home for the holidays rigged up in this style, and promenade down to the station... Goodness! They'd just burst with envy. Wouldn't they? If only I weren't afraid of my father! He'd kill me on the spot. He's on the hunt for me with a crowbar. Once he caught me dancing with Franek at the village tavern and he gave me such a rap over the arm with a rod (Showing her arm.) that I carry the mark to this very day. I come from a fine family. My father is a butcher. Talk about the fellows that were after me!... (In a low voice.) They tried to make a match between me and Nottke the meat-chopper. I've got his gold ring still. (Indicating a ring upon her finger.) He gave it to me at the Feast of Tabernacles.* Maybe he wasn't wild to marry me, — but I didn't care to.
    ellauri302.html on line 231: Described in Leviticus 23, The Feast of Weeks is the second of the three “solemn feasts” that all Jewish males were required to travel to Jerusalem to attend (Exodus 23:14–17; 34:22–23; Deuteronomy 16:16). This important feast gets its name from the fact that it starts seven full weeks, or exactly 50 days, after the Feast of Firstfruits. Since it takes place exactly 50 days after the previous feast, this feast is also known as “Pentecost” (Acts 2:1), which means “fiftieth.”
    ellauri302.html on line 235: Since the Feast of Weeks was one of the “harvest feasts,” the Jews were commanded to “present an offering of new grain to the Lord” (Leviticus 23:16). This offering was to be “two wave loaves of two-tenths of an ephah” which were made “of fine flour... baked with leaven.” The offerings were to be made of the first fruits of that harvest (Leviticus 23:17). Along with the “wave offerings” they were also to offer seven first-year lambs that were without blemish along with one young bull and two rams. Additional offerings are also prescribed in Leviticus and the other passages that outline how this feast was to be observed. Another important requirement of this feast is that, when the Jews harvested their fields, they were required to leave the corners of the field untouched and not gather “any gleanings” from the harvest as a way of providing for the poor and strangers (Leviticus 23:22).
    ellauri302.html on line 243: Basha: Here, at least, I'm a free person. I've got my chest of finery, and dress swell. Better clothes, upon my word, than the rich daughters of my village... (Fetching from her compartment a hrown dress.) When I go walking on Marshalkovski street in this dress they all stare at me... Fire and flame! Mm! If I could only put in an appearance in my home town dressed in this fashion, here 's how I 'd promenade to the station. (Struts across the room like a lady of fashion^ raising her skirt at the hack and assuming a cosmopolitan air.) They'd die of jealousy, I tell you... They'd be stricken with apoplexy on the spot. (Promenades about the room playing the grand dame.)
    ellauri302.html on line 245: Reizel, straightens the folds of Bashas dress in the back and adjusts her hat to a better angle. That's the way! Now raise your head a bit higher... Who needs to know that you were ever in a place of this sort? You'll tell them that you were with a big business house. A Count has fallen in love with you...
    ellauri302.html on line 247: Hindel, from her room, where she is still busy with her chest of clothes. And what's the matter with a place of this sort, I'd like to know? Aren't we every bit as good as the girls in the business houses, eh? The whole world is like that nowadays; that's what the world demands. In these days even the daughters of the best families aren't any better. This is our way of earning a living. And believe me, when one of us gets married, she's more faithful to her husband than any of the others. We know what a man has.
    ellauri302.html on line 249: Shut up, will you? Late at night they have to start telling stories about the dead. No dead people can come here. Our boss has a Holy Scroll upstairs... (A sudden hush.) What's wrong about our trade, I'd like to know? (She leaves her little room and goes into the basement.) Wasn't our mistress in a house like this for fifteen years? Yet she married. And isn't she a respectable God-fearing woman?... Doesn 't she observe all the laws that a Jewish daughter must keep?... And isn't her Rifkele a pure child? And isn't our boss a respectable man? Isn't he generous? Doesn't he give the biggest donations to charity?... And he's had a Holy Scroll written...
    ellauri302.html on line 257: Manke: Bah! He's a fool. Third time he's come in a row. And he keeps asking me, who's my father, who's my mother, — as if he intended to marry me... Whenever he kisses me he hides his face in my bosom, closes his eyes and smiles as if he were a babe in his mother's arms. (Looks around. In a low voice, to Hindel.) Hasn't Rifkele been here yet?
    ellauri302.html on line 262: Basha: At home when we have a shower like this the gutters run over and flood the narrow lanes. And we take off our shoes and stockings and panties and dance in the rain barefoot... Who's going to take her shoes off? (Removes her shoes and stockings.) Take off your shoes, Manke, and let's dance in the rain!
    ellauri302.html on line 269: Rifkele thrusts her head through the window. She is in her night clothes, covered by a light shawl. She whispers cautiously.
    ellauri302.html on line 272: Manke: Don't be afraid of your father. He won't wake up so soon. Come, let's rather stand in the rain. I'll let your hair down. (She undoes Rifkele's braids, reaching for her breasts doing so.) There. And now I'll wash them for you in the rain. Just like this.
    ellauri302.html on line 286: With God's help, if I can only get both of them, Rifkele and Manke, this very night... I 'll take them directly to Shloyme 's... And I 'll say to him, "Here you are... Here's your bread and butter. Now rent a place, marry me, and become as respectable a man as the Uncle. Well have a girl and it's back to square one.
    ellauri302.html on line 294: Are you cold, Rifkele darling? Nestle close to me... Ever so close... Warm yourself next to me. So. Come, let's sit down here on the lounge. (Leads Rifkele to a lounge; they sit down.) Just like this... Now rest your face snugly in my bosom. So. Just like that. And let your body touch mine... It's so cool... as if water were running between us. (Pause.) I uncovered your breasts and washed them with the rainwater that trickled down my arms. Your breasts are so white and soft. And the blood in them cools under the touch, just like white snow, — like frozen water... and their fragrance is like the grass on the meadows. And I let down your hair so... (Buns her fingers through RifkeWs hair.) And I held them like this in the rain and washed them. How sweet they smell... Like the rain itself... (She huries her face in Rifkele's hair.) Yes, I can smell the scent of the May rain in them... So light, so fine... And fresh... as the grass on the meadows... as the apple on the bough... So. Cool me, refresh me with your tresses. (She washes her face in Rifkele^s hair.) Cool me, — so. But wait... I'll comb you as if you were a bride... a nice part and two long, black braids. (Does so.) Do you want me to, Rifkele? Do you?
    ellauri302.html on line 306: Manke: Then we come closer to one another, for we are bride and bridegroom, you and I. We embrace. (Places her arm around Bifkele.) Ever so tightly. And kiss, very softly. Like this. (Kisses Rifkele.) And we turn so red, — we're so bashful. It's nice, Rifkele, isn't it?
    ellauri302.html on line 310: Manke, lowering her voice, and whispering into Bifkele' s ear. And then we go to sleep together. Nobody sees, nobody hears. Only you and I. Like this. (Clasps Bifkele tightly to herself.) Do you want to sleep with me tonight like this? Eh?
    ellauri302.html on line 322: Manke No. We'll run away this very night, — with Hindel, to her house... She has a house with Shloyme, she told me. You'll see how nice everything will be... Young folks will be there aplenty, — army officers... and we'll be together, all by ourselves, all day long. We'll dress just like the officers and go horseback-riding. Come, Rifkele, — do you want to?
    ellauri302.html on line 333: Reizel and Basha, together. What's this? Where are you going?
    ellauri302.html on line 337: Reizel: There's something suspicious about this that I don't like.
    ellauri302.html on line 351: Yekel, rushes into the basement a burning candle in his hand. His hair is in disorder. Over his nightshirt he has thrown a coat. He shouts wildly.) Rifkele! Rifkele! Is Rifkele here? (No reply. He tears the curtains of the compartments violently aside.) Rifkele! Where is she? (Waking Reizel and Basha.) Where is Rifkele! Rifkele! Where is she? Whatever happened to the scroll? Did they elope together?
    ellauri302.html on line 363: Yekel, enters from Bifkele's room. He is without hat or coat; his hair is in disorder. His eyes have a wild glare, and he speaks slowly, with a subdued, hoarse voice,
    ellauri302.html on line 376: Sarah: So you want to go back to the basement? — Into the basement, then! Much I care! (Resumes her packing.) He wants to ruin us completely. What has come over the man? (For a moment she is absorbed in reflection.) If you're going to stand there like a lunatic, I'll get busy myself! (Takes off her diamond ear-rings.) I'll go over to Shloyme's and give him my diamond ear-rings. (From her bundle she draws out a golden chain.) And if he holds back, I'll add a hundred rouble note. (She searches YeheVs trousers pocket for his pockethook. He offers no resistance.) Within fifteen minutes (Throwing a shawl over her shoulders.) Rifkele will be here. (As she leaves.) Shloyme will do that for me. (Slams the door behind her.)
    ellauri302.html on line 378: Yekel, walks about the room, his head bowed.
    ellauri302.html on line 422: Fine! Then what's all this commotion about? The whole town will know all about it before long. Such things should be kept dark. They're not nice. If a prospective father-in-law ever got wind of the story, her dowry would have to be raised a couple of hundred roubles...
    ellauri302.html on line 428: Fie! You're out of your head altogether. True, a misfortune has befallen you. May Heaven watch over aU of us. Well? What? Misfortunes happen to plenty of folks. The Lord sends aid and things turn out all right. The important point is to keep your mouth shut. Hear nothing. See nothing. Just wash your hands clean of it and forget it. (To Reizel.) Be careful what you say. Don't let it travel any further, God forbid. Do you hear? (Turns to Yekel, who is staring vacantly into space.) I had a talk with... (Looks around to see whether Reizel is still present. Seeing her, he stops. After a pause he begins anew, more softly, looking at Reizel as a hint for her to leave.) With er, er... (Casts a significant glance at Reizel, who at last understands, and leaves.) I had a talk with the groom's father. I spoke to him between the afternoon and evening prayers, at the synagogue. He's almost ready to talk business. Of course I gave him to understand that the bride doesn't boast a very high pedigree, but I guess another hundred roubles will fix that up, all right. Nowadays, pedigrees don't count as much as they used to. With God's help I'll surely be here this Sabbath, with the groom's father. We'll go down to the Dayon and have him examine the young man in his religious studies... But nobody must get wind of this tale. It might spoil everything. The father comes of a fine family and the son carries a smart head on his shoulders. There, there. Calm yourself. Trust in the Lord and everything will turn out for the best. With God's help I am going home to prepare for the morning prayer. And as soon as the girl returns, notify me. Remember, now. (About to go.)
    ellauri302.html on line 448: Reb Ali: Don't speak folly, I tell you. Calm yourself. Pray fervently for the Lord's pardon. Give up this business of yours. With God's help your daughter will yet marry just like aU Jewish women, and bring you plenty of happiness.
    ellauri302.html on line 455: Yekel, interrupting. Don't try to console me, Rebbi. I am inconsolable. I know that it's too late. Sin encircles me and mine like a rope around a person's neck. God wouldn't have it. But I ask you, Rebbi, why wouldn't He have it? What harm would it have done Him if I, Yekel Tchaftchovitch, should have been raised from the mire into which I have fallen? (He goes into Rifkele's room, carries out the Sacred Parchment, raises it aloft and speaks.) You, Holy Scroll, I know, — you are a great God! For you are our Lord! I, Yekel Tchaftchovitch, have sinned. (Beats his hreast with his closed fist.) My sins... my sins... Work a miracle, — send down a pillar of fire to consume me. On this very spot, where I now stand! Open up the earth at my feet and let it swallow me! But shield my daughter. Send her back to me as pure and innocent as when she left. I know... to You everything is possible. Work a miracle! For You are an almighty God. And if You don't, then You're no God at all, I tell j^ou. I, Yekel Tchaftchovitch, tell You that You are as vengeful as any human being...
    ellauri302.html on line 459: Yekel The truth may be spoken even before God's very face! (Follows Beh Ali into Rifkele's room.) If He's a true God, then let Him reveal His miracle here on this very spot!
    ellauri302.html on line 465: Eeb Ali, enters, with Yekel. Praised be the Lord! Praised be the Heavenly Father! (Following Yekel, who paces ahout the room.) See how the Almighty, blessed be His Name, has come to your aid? He punishes, — yes. But he sends the remedy before the disease. Despite your having sinned, despite your having uttered blasphemy. (Admonishi7ig him.) From now on see to it that you never speak such words, — that you have reverence, great reverence... Know what a Holy Scroll is, and what a learned Jew is... You must go to the synagogue, and you must make a generous donation to the students of the Law. You must fast in atonement, and the Lord will forgive you. (Pause. Beh Ali looks sternly at Yekel, who has continued to walk about the room, absorbed in his thoughts.) What? Aren't you listening to me? With the aid of the Almighty everything will turn out for the best. I'm going at once to the groom's father and we'll discuss the whole matter in detail. But be sure not to haggle. A hundred roubles more or less, — remember who you are and who he is. And what's more, see to it that you settle the dowry right away and indulge in no idle talk about the wedding. Heaven forbid, — another misfortune might occur!
    ellauri302.html on line 474: Reb Ali The truth. The truth. Heaven will help you... Everything will turn out for the best. I'm going to the young man's father directly. He's over at the synagogue and must surely be waiting for me. (Looks around.) Tell your wife to put the house in order in the meantime. And you, prepare the contract, and at once, so that he'll have no time to discover anything amiss and withdraw. Arrange the wedding date and have the bride go at once to her parents-in-law. No idle chatter, remember. Keep silent, so that nobody wiU learn anything about it. (Ready to go.) And cast all this nonsense out of your head. Trust in the Lord and rejoice in His comfort. (At the door.) Tell your wife to tidy up the place. (Leaves.)
    ellauri302.html on line 486: Yekel, at the top of his voice. You don't know! You don't know! Then who does know? What do you mean, — you don't know?" The truth, now! Are you still —
    ellauri302.html on line 490: Sarah, brings in Yekel's coat and funny hats and places them upon him. He offers no resistance. What a misfortune! What a misfortune! Who could have foreseen such a thing? (She straightens YekeVs coat, then puts the room in order. Runs into Rifkele's room. She is heard hiding something there, and soon returns.) I'll have a reckoning with you later. (Putting the finishing touches to the room.) Terrible days, these. Bring up children with so much care and anxiety, and... Ah! (Footsteps are heard outside. Sarah runs over to Yekel and pulls his sleeve.) They're here! For the love of God, Yekel, remember! Everything can be fixed yet. (Enter Reh Ali arid a stranger. Sarah hastily thrusts her hair under her wig and goes to the door to ivelcome the visitors.)
    ellauri302.html on line 501: Reb Ali, gesticulating. Let's get right down to business. (To the stranger, pointing to Tekel.) This gentleman wishes to unite families with you. He has an excellent daughter and wants as her husband a scholar well versed in Rabbinical lore. He'll support the couple for life.
    ellauri302.html on line 507: Reb Ali, to the stranger. He's ready to settle upon her a dowry of five hundred roubles cash at the time of the engagement... And he'll support the couple for life. He will treat your son as his own child.
    ellauri302.html on line 509: The Stranger Well, — there 's little need of my boosting my goods. With two years more of study, he'll have the whole learning at his finger tips.
    ellauri302.html on line 512: Naturally, naturally. This gentleman will guard him like the apple of his eye. He'll have the best of everything here. He'll be able to sit and study the Holy Law day and night, to his heart's content.
    ellauri302.html on line 518: Sarah, rushing madly over to Yekel. Good God! He 's gone stark mad! (She tries to tear Rifkele away from Yekel; he thrusts Sarah aside and drags his daughter out by the hair.)
    ellauri302.html on line 522: The Stranger, with amazement and fright. What is this? (Bel) Ali beckons to him, pulls him by the sleeve and points to the door. The stranger stands motionless in his astonishment. Reb Ali draws him to the door. They leave.
    ellauri302.html on line 618: Tanakhista on varhaisin tunnettu teksti kuuluisan " kultaisen säännön " positiivisesta muodosta:
    ellauri302.html on line 628: Ei Jeshua siis kexinyt ize tätäkään. Isämeitä on otettu kaddishista ja herran siunaus toorasta. Jonnin joutavaa. Tällästä ne höpisee jeshivoissa sillä aikaa kun moppipäät vaimot käyvät töissä, töiden jälkeen kaupassa ja imuroivat, keittävät klimppisopan ja gefillte fishin valmiixi siihen kun Tvi Ari tulee nälkäisenä kotio. Mikä täällä haisee? Kukkakaaliko?
    ellauri302.html on line 697: Suutari pieri Liisan vannassa. Pietari Suuri oli Veikko Huovisen kolmas iso paha susi. Tämähän oikeastaan selittää Borixen teodikea-ongelman, eli mixi pitää apinoiden olla niin sotaisia. Ne handlaavat kullanjanoisina, drååpaten jumaliste kauhistuneita notmiitä ja keihästäen tylpällä keihäällä niiden narttuja, päästellen kajahtavia sjöfartteja pottu molemmissa päissä. Eli good old motiivit EAT! FUCK! KILL!.
    ellauri302.html on line 741: Juutalaiset on kovia kauppamiehiä, uskonnossakin ne laskeskelee koko ajan mikä kannattaa ja kuka lunastaa. Varasto maxoi enemmän kuin saan jos myyn sen könttäsummalla. Lea piti lumppukauppaa Hertzin köyriessä slarvoja ja slamppoja. Anna on niin yxinäinen että jopa Yascha Kotik kelpaa. Parempi kuin koira tai papukaija, onhan sillä sentään nuppipää schischeli. 4ttä jutkuäijää se ei enää jaxa. Grein ei osaa olla enää vilpitön. Se on pelkkää vilppiä koko kaippari. Niin myös Yascha Kotik, joka suutelee taalanippua ja räknää minkä arvoinen Anna mahtaa olla dollareissa. Nu tänker han sälja sig så dyrt som möjligt. Trissa upp priset helt enkelt. Jutkut sopii jenkkeihin kuin suutarin sormi sian pilluun.
    ellauri308.html on line 79: Ja päästähän sitten "temppelihis" ja hellien johdata mua,
    ellauri308.html on line 87: sivuaineina estetiikka ja taidehistoria. Kuusinen liittyi Hämäläiseen
    ellauri308.html on line 201: Renkivuosiltaan Tuominen muistaa ensimmäisen kohtaamisensa Frans Eemil Sillanpään kanssa. Hän muisteli katkerana miettineensä, kuinka mäkitupalaisen poika Pransu kukkoili raitilla ylioppilaana ja hän, arvostetun käsityöläisen poika, raatoi renkinä. Moskovassa oleskellessaan Arvo Tuominen kirjoitti poliittista henkilöhistoriaansa ja muisteli luokkatietoisena ja katkerana oleskeluaan Kuukan talossa tähän tapaan: ”Tällöin minussa heräsi viha rikkaita ja heidän lapsiaan kohtaan. Ei se mitään aatteellisuutta ollut, olin vain ihan vitun kade. Vaistomaisesti hain tukea muista renkipojista joiden kanssa liityin kotipitäjäni työväenyhdistykseen.” Niissä hän hieman liioitteli, sillä häntä pidettiin arvossa ja kohdeltiin talossa hyvin, mutta tietty katkeruus katkenneesta koulutiestä säilyi läpi elämän.
    ellauri308.html on line 203: Tuominen oppi höyrypääpuusepän ammatin, mutta häntä vaivasi valtava kirjallisen sivistyksen nälkä. Hänestä tuli Tampereen työväenopiston innokas opiskelija. Kaiken kaikkiaan hän kuunteli eri alojen luentoja melkein kuusi vuotta. Niiden joukossa oli 40-tuntinen luentosarja Kalevalasta, mikä innosti häntä eepoksen huolelliseen tutkimiseen. Yhteiskunnalliset aineet ja kysymykset herättivät hänessä erityistä mielenkiintoa. Hän jäi usein keskustelemaan ja väittelemään politiikasta oppituntien jälkeenkin työläisjoukkoon, josta muodostui niin sanottu ”Lauantaiseura”. Seuraa veti itseoppinut filosofi Masse Lehtonen, joka suorasukaisen ärsyttävillä kommenteillaan sai muut väittelemään. Seuraan kuului myös muita työväenliikkeen merkkimiehiä, kuten järjestöaktiivi Manu Lammi, radikalismin tuntija ja ammattiyhdistysaktiivi Edvin Linkomies, Tampereen Työväen teatterin historioitsija Nikolai Ahonen ja myöhempi leipomoyrittäjä Aarne Lemberg (Lvïv, myöh. Linkosuo). Tämä joukko kasvatti Arvo Tuomisesta kovan väittelijän ja keskustelijan. Nuoren keskustelijan pikkuvanhuus herätti huvittuneisuutta, ja hänen lyhyytensä jäykkänä toi hänelle lempinimen ”Poika”, joka katkeruuden lisäxi seurasi häntä läpi elämän.
    ellauri308.html on line 271: Ville oli vaurastuneen kyläräätälin äiditön poika jonka lukuaineiden keskiarvo oli 9,2. Isä teki pankrotin ja kuoli. Wille oli koulupoikana hartaan uskonnollinen, rukoili paljon, kävi ahkerasti kirkossa ja kirjoitteli romanttisia runoja. Muun koulunuorison tavoin hän oli erittäin isänmaallinen, mikä näkyi muun muassa hänen kirjoittamissaan runoissa. Oton 1. vaimo Saima oli sitä 8v vanhempi. Lanko Einar Dahlström (myöh. Laaksovirta) oli kotoisin varakkaasta talosta Luhangasta. Syksyllä 1900 hän kirjautui Helsingin yliopistoon valiten pääaineikseen filosofian, estetiikan ja taidehistorian. Oton ja Saiman esikoistytär Aino syntyi heinäkuun lopulla 1901, mikä johti yliopisto-opintojen katkeamiseen. Siitä huolimatta, että Dalhströmit avustivat taloudellisesti nuorta paria, heidän toimeentulonsa ei ollut kehuttava. Aino-tytär kuoli vuonna 1903, jolloin isänmaallisen maaseudun puolustajan, Jumalaa pelkävään vanhasuomalaisen Kuusisen usko alkoi horjua ja sosialismi otti hänen elämässään uskonnon paikan. Ei niin pahaa ettei jotain hyvääkin: Kuusinen valmistui filosofian kandidaatiksi lokakuussa 1905.
    ellauri308.html on line 289: Kuusinen loi varsinaisen uransa Neuvosto-Venäjällä ja Neuvostoliitossa. Hän osallistui SKP:n edustajana tammikuussa 1919 kommunististen puolueiden neuvottelukokoukseen, jossa päätettiin esittää vetoomus uuden kolmannen eli Kommunistisen internationaalin (Komintern) perustamiseksi. Kominternin perustavassa kokouksessa 2. maaliskuuta 1919 Kuusisella oli näkyvä rooli tämän puolustaessa uuden internationaalin tarpeellisuutta sen perustamisen lykkäämistä esittäneille. Kuusinen valittiin 1921 yhdeksi Kominternin toimeenpanevan komitean sihteereistä, missä toimessa hän jatkoi vuoteen 1939. Esimerkiksi Kominternin 4. kongressissa Kuusinen valittiin lisäksi puhemiehistöön ja toimeenpanevaan komiteaan.1927 Kuusinen johti Kominternin Lev Trotskin erottanutta kokousta. 1930-luvun loppupuolella Kuusinen puhui yhteisrintamataktiikan puolesta Kominternin jäsenpuolueissa. Kuusiselle oli luonteenomaista hiljainen työskentely kulissien takana.
    ellauri308.html on line 309:
    Veikko Hyyskä Ikaalinen, historianharrastaja,
    ellauri308.html on line 353: Sekä juutalaisuuteen kohdistuva erityinen viehtymys että erityinen inho saattavat kummuta samasta lähteestä: juutalaisten erityislaatuisuudesta. Mielestäni holokausti historiallisena tosiasiana nimenomaisesti alleviivaa universaalisti ymmärretyn kansallisuusaatteen tarvetta ja sen moraalista oikeutusta.
    ellauri308.html on line 366: Sakut pistivät vuoden 1942 heinä-lokakuun väliin sijoittuneen 100:n päivän aikana pelkästään etniseltä taustaltaan juutalaista väestöä hiilidioksidina taivaalle about 1,47 miljoonaa yksilöä. Tappotahti on yhäti lyömätön satasen ennätys, jolle ei löydy vertaa mistään historiasta. Mutta pitkän matkan juoksussa kommarit ovat olleet kovempia. Paskaa puhelet. Natseilta loppui aika kun loppui paukut. ”Ali-ihmiset” pisti ”herrakansalle” pataan. Ei ole kuulunut edes huhuja, että gulageilla olis marssitettu naisia ja lapsia ”suihkuun”, pakotettu vangit roudaamaan ruumit uuniin ja tuhkat kaalipelloille. Ei kaasua eikä uunia, joutuivat vain tekemään nälkiintyneinä talvioloissa paskaduunia.
    ellauri308.html on line 387: Me kristityt ja muslimit olemme uskonnollisessa katsannossa Abrahamin jälkeläisiä, joten älä viitsi esittää tyhmää. Abrahamilla, joka tietysti on myyttinen hahmo vailla historiallista faktapohjaa, ei sinänsä ole mitään tekemistä homo sapiensin kehityksen kanssa. Ja kyllä me sitäpaizi olemme valkoisia eurooppalaisia, emmekä mitään nekkejä:
    ellauri308.html on line 424: Vuonna 2006 tehdyssä lehtihaastattelussa Solženitsyn väitti, että Etelä- ja Itä-Ukraina, Krimin niemimaa ja Donbas eivät ole koskaan kuuluneet historialliseen Ukrainaan, ja että maata viedään NATO:n jäseneksi vastoin näiden alueiden asukkaiden tahtoa, Tuominen kirjoittaa.
    ellauri308.html on line 433: Filosofi, akatemiatutkija Jussi Backmanin mielestä Dugin on pikemminkin oireellinen kuin vaarallinen. Kun liberalismissa ihminen on itseriittoinen ja autonominen yksilö, Duginin teoriassa ihminen on historian, kulttuurin, kielen ja yhteisön määrittämä.
    ellauri308.html on line 446: Dugin hyödyntää ranskalaisilta filosofeilta kuten Michel Foucault’lta ja Jean-François Lyotardilta peräisin olevaa valistuksen “suurten kertomusten” kritiikkiä. Sen avulla voidaan horjuttaa liberalismin itsestään kertomaa tarinaa, jonka mukaan liberaali demokratia on historian universaali päätepiste, johon kaikki kehitys on tähdännyt. Dugin viittaa erityisesti amerikkalaisfilosofi Francis Fukuyaman ajatukseen liberaalista demokratiasta “historian loppuna”.
    ellauri308.html on line 466: Henryk Adam Aleksander Pius Sienkiewicz (5. toukokuuta 1846 Wola Okrzejska, Puola – 15. marraskuuta 1916 Vevey, Sveitsi) oli puolalainen toimittaja, kirjailija ja Nobelin kirjallisuuspalkinnon saaja eeppisten kirjallisten ansioidensa vuoksi. Hänet muistetaan parhaiten historiallisista romaaneistaan. Kansainvälisesti tunnettu menestyskirja on Quo Vadis (1896).
    ellauri308.html on line 481: Ukraina on täynnä Henrykin pazaita, varsinkin Lwiw. Hänen teoksiaan myös moitittiin liian pelkistetyiksi. 20. vuosisadan puolalainen kirjailija ja dramaturgi Witold Gombrowicz kuvasi Sienkiewiczia ensiluokkaiseksi toisen luokan kirjailijaksi.  Vasily Rozanov kuvaili Quo Vadista, ettei se ole taideteos, vaan kuin karkea tehdastekoinen maalaus. Anton Tšehov kutsui Sienkiewiczin kirjoitelmia oksettavan äiteliksi ja tökeröiksi. Kuitenkin Puolan kirjallisuushistorioitsija Henryk Markiewicz kirjoitti Polski słownik biograficznyssä (Puolalaisten elämäkertojen sanakirjassa) artikkelin Sienkiewiczista (1997). Markiewicz kuvaa Sienkiewiczia puolalaisen proosan mestariksi ja puolalaisen historiallisen fiktion eturivin kirjailijaksi ja samalla kansainvälisesti parhaiten tunnetuksi puolalaiseksi kirjailijaksi. Haha LOL, kiitos Hollywoodin.
    ellauri308.html on line 532: Hän oli ainoa kirjailija, jolle oli varattu huoneita Kremlissä. Hänen ensimmäinen poliittinen takaisku tuli joulukuussa 1930, kun puolueen keskuskomitea tuomitsi kaksi hänen historiallista runoaan . Hän kirjoitti Stalinille valitettavan kirjeen, jossa hän kysyi, ja sai pitkän vastauksen, jossa hän syytti häntä Venäjän työväenluokan loukkaamisesta. Stalin ei myöskään pitänyt näytelmästä, jonka Bedny oli kirjoittanut vuonna 1932 puna-armeijasta ja kutsui sitä "keskinkertaiseksi".
    ellauri308.html on line 595: Turko Sefardijuutalaiset Ashkenazi-juutalaiset Ladinon sana tarkoittaa "turkkilaista". Termin tarkka historia on epävarma, mutta se viittaa mahdollisesti ashkenazi-syntyperää koskevaan Khazar-hypoteesiin.
    ellauri308.html on line 665: Zhydobandera, Zhidobandera, or Zhydobanderovets – "Yid-Banderite" or "Judeo-Banderite" a conflation of Zhyd (i.e., a Kike) and a Bandera follower. This is an ironic self-appellation coined by Ukrainian Jewish activists during the Euromaidan protests to highlight the inconsistency of Russian propaganda which demonized Ukrainian pro-Europe and pro-democracy activism as fascist to the West and as Jewish to Ukrainians, with reference to "Judeo-Bolshevism".
    ellauri308.html on line 681: nezalezhnaya – venäläinen pilkallinen slangiviittaus Ukrainaan. Ukrainan nezalezhnan lainaus , "itsenäinen", venäläisellä lopulla, pilkaten Ukrainan historiallista itsenäisyystaistelua (vrt. Venäjän nezavisimaya ). Venäläiset ja venäläiset joukkotiedotusvälineet käyttävät toisinaan puhekielessä ilmaistakseen ironista, halventavaa asennetta Ukrainaa kohtaan.
    ellauri308.html on line 741: Otto Wille Kuusisen talvisodan aikana vuosina 1939–1940 johtamassa Terijoen hallituksessa Äikiä oli maatalousministeri. Hän ei tehnyt tähän tehtävään liittyviä virkatoimia, kuten eivät muutkaan Terijoen hallituksen jäsenet. Hän olisi mieluummin ollut tekemättä kulttuuriministerin hommia. Toimittaja Yrjö Kilpeläinen eli nimimerkki Jahvetti väitti useassa pakinassaan, että Äikiä olisi halunnut kulttuuriministeriksi. Kuusinen oli Jahvetin tietojen mukaan kuitenkin estänyt tämän, mikä johtui Äikiän taiteellisen ilmaisun kehnoudesta.lähde? Poliittisen historian professorin Kimmo Rentolan mukaan Äikiä ”arveli olevansa runoilija”.
    ellauri308.html on line 788: Sisustus vanhoissa Hrutsevin taloissa oli aika rauhismainen.
    ellauri309.html on line 121: läheisen historiallisen Boone-hotellin. Kun se tuhoutui tulipalossa
    ellauri309.html on line 265: suomexi, tulkoon loppu enkuxi. I don’t know this woman; she doesn’t know
    ellauri309.html on line 274: conversation? In this case–writer to writer–could you have spoken to your
    ellauri309.html on line 289: because they can. This foolish and false statement has damaged my
    ellauri309.html on line 291: when I did nothing but write and title a book. While this writer issued a
    ellauri309.html on line 295: agent. Shame on them. I had every intention of letting this go, until the
    ellauri309.html on line 299: reputation and my work. I’m appalled by this, sickened by it. I’m disgusted
    ellauri309.html on line 306: writer who started this (Tomi something foreign, a coon in dreadlocks), or the title of her book or mine. I don’t want
    ellauri309.html on line 307: this to escalate any more than it has. I don’t want my readers to go on the
    ellauri309.html on line 509: Billy Graham varttui maitotilallisen poikana Pohjois-Carolinan maaseudulla. He started to read books from an early age and loved to read novels for boys, especially Tarzan. Like Tarzan, he would hang on the trees and gave the popular Tarzan yell. According to his father, that yelling led him to become a minister. Vuonna 1934 Graham osallistui evankelista Mordecai Hamin kokoukseen ja teki henkilökohtaisen uskonratkaisun. Ham had a reputation for racism and anti-Semitism. He believed and preached on various topics based on classical anti-Semitic canards such as believing Jews had special access to political power and influence and that they represent a subversive social force. The targets for his preaching were often "nebulous rings of Jewish, Catholic or Black conspirators plotting to destroy white protestant America."
    ellauri309.html on line 511: Vuonna 1936 Graham jätti isänsä maitotilan ja lähti opiskelemaan Bob Jonesin Collegeen, joka sijaitsi tuolloin Tennesseen Clevelandissa. Opinnot Bob Jonesin Collegessa jäivät kuitenkin yhden lukukauden mittaiseksi oppilaitoksen äärimmäisen fundamentalismin vuoksi. Graham siirtyi opiskelemaan Floridan raamattuinstituuttiin Tampan läheisyyteen. Graham valmistui vuonna 1940 ja hänet asetettiin Eteläisen baptistikonvention pastorin tehtävään. Graham ilmoittautui jatkokoulutukseen Illinoisissa sijaitsevaan Wheaton Collegeen ja tapasi Wheatonissa tulevan vaimonsa, Ruth Bellin. She had been conceived in China in missionary position, unlike a horse. Graham talked his future wife, Ruth, into abandoning her ambition to evangelize in Tibet in favor of staying in the United States to marry him – and that to do otherwise would be "to thwart God's obvious will". After Ruth agreed to marry him, Graham cited the Bible for claiming authority over her, saying, "then I'll do the leading and you do the following".
    ellauri309.html on line 515: Hoover and Sullivan considered King “the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation”. Armed with salacious archival material from a recent FBI documents release, Garrow has reported about the iconic civil rights leader’s sexual misconduct, ranging from numerous extramarital affairs and solicitation of prostitutes to the allegation that he was present during the violent rape of a Maryland churchgoer. Garrow insists that a fundamental reconsideration of King's reputation is imminent. He describes how King and a handful of Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) officials checked into Washington DC’s Willard hotel along with “several women ‘parishioners’”. The group met in his room and discussed which women among the parishioners would be suitable for natural and unnatural sex acts, meaning anal and oral, genital being natural. The alleged rapist was Reverend Logan Kearse, a Baptist minister from Baltimore. Reportedly, "Mike" King just stood by with erect cock in hand overseeing the action, like another Kim Yung Il.
    ellauri309.html on line 517: This is not the first time that scholars have raised concerns about Garrow’s intelligence. Besides, as Donna Murch of Guardian points out, it is rather normal for our great men to have huge cocks and insatiable sexual appetites. This does not make them any less great, rather the opposite.
    ellauri309.html on line 519: In April 2010, Graham experienced substantial vision, hearing, and balance loss. Grahamin mäntyvanerisen arkun olivat tehneet Louisianan Angolan vankilan murhasta tuomitut vangit. According to the wealth-tracking site TheRichest.com, Billy Graham's net worth was an estimated $25 million at the time of his death. Aika heikkoa!
    ellauri309.html on line 521: In 2011, when asked if he would have done things differently, Billy said he would have spent more time at home with his family, studied more, fucked more, and preached less. Additionally, he said he would have participated in fewer conferences. Graham had a steamy relationship with Queen Elizabeth II. Graham was outspoken against communism and supported the American Cold War policy, including the Vietnam War. In 2009, more Nixon tapes were released, in which Graham is heard in a 1973 conversation with Nixon referring to Jewish journalists as "the synagogue of Satan". He further stated that the role of wife, mother, and homemaker was the destiny of "real womanhood" according to the Judeo-Christian ethic. Graham's daughter Bunny recounted her father denying her and her sisters higher education. Graham regarded homosexuality as a sin, and in 1974 described it as "a sinister form of perversion". AIDS oli ehkä jumalan designoima rangaistus pyllyhommista.
    ellauri309.html on line 523: Valmistuessaan Wheatonista vuonna 1943 Graham oli kehittänyt kuuluisan sormea heristävän saarnatyylinsä. Graham viesti yksinkertaisesti ja suorasti synnistä ja pelastuksesta, jonka hän välitti tarmokkaasti ja ilman alentuvuutta tyhmille. Graham toimi lyhyen aikaa Western Springsin baptistikirkon pastorina, jonka jälkeen hän ryhtyi kiertäväksi evankelistaksi. Graham liittyi uuden Youth for Christ-järjestön henkilöstöön vuonna 1945 ja toimi vuodesta 1947 Northwestern Bible Collegen johtajana. Grahamin toiminnan keskiössä olivat suuret, kirkkokuntarajat ylittävät, kokoukset, joita kutsutaan nimellä missio tai ristiretki. Niistä saadut palkkiot oli selkeästi parhaimmat. Vuonna 1992 Graham kutsuttiin jopa maailman sulkeutuneimmaksi valtioksi arvioituun Pohjois-Koreaan. Vierailun aikana Billy luonnehti maan johtajaa Kim Il Sungia "Jumalaksi" ja nykyistä pulleaa johtajaa Kim Jong Unia "Jumalan pojaxi". Kim was "a different kind of communist." Graham's early crusades were segregated, but he began adjusting his approach in the 1950s.
    ellauri309.html on line 544: Tulsa on kaupunki Yhdysvaltojen Oklahoman osavaltion koillisosassa. Kaupungin alueen alkuperäisasukkaita olivat osaget ja itse kaupungin perustivat kotiseuduiltaan pakkosiirretyt creekit vuonna 1836. Sittemmin kaupunki kasvoi nopeasti maaöljyn löytymisen jälkeen 1900-luvun alussa. Osaget joutuivat luopumaan maistaan Tulsassa vuonna 1826 ja Yhdysvallat alkoi asuttaa paikalle alkuperäisiltä kotiseuduiltaan karkotettuja creekejä ja cherokeeita. Mukana oli myös intiaanien omistamia afroamerikkalaisia orjia. Tulsan rotumellakat vuonna 1921 kuuluvat Yhdysvaltojen historian väkivaltaisimpiin. Kaupungin asukkaista 64 % oli taustaltaan valkoisia (latinot pois lukien 54,9 %), 15,1 % afroamerikkalaisia, 4,3 % intiaaneja, 15,8 % latinoja mistä tahansa rodusta ja 3,3 % aasialaisia. 17,6 % kaupungin asukkaista puhui kotonaan jotakin muuta kieltä kuin englantia ja 10,9 % kaupungin asukkaista oli syntynyt ulkomailla. Nimi "Tylsä" on sama kuin "Tällä hässii" ja tarkoittaa inkkarien kielellä "tuppukylä". Nicknamed: "Buckle of the Bible Belt", "Capital of the world".
    ellauri309.html on line 608: antropologit pitävät teologian vetovoimaa köyhistä – erityisesti
    ellauri309.html on line 1053: Hänet tunnetaan parhaiten toimintasankarirooleistaan, erityisesti hänen läpimurtoroolistaan ​​Max Rockatanskyna post-apokalyptisen toimintasarjan Mad Max kolmessa ensimmäisessä elokuvassa ja Martin Riggsina kaveripoliisi toimintakomediasarjassa Tappava ase. Vuonna 1995 Gibson tuotti, ohjasi ja näytteli Braveheartissa, historiallisessa eeposessa. Myöhemmin hän ohjasi ja tuotti The Passion of the Christ -kirjan, raamatullisen draaman, joka oli sekä taloudellisesti menestynyt että erittäin kiistanalainen. Espanjalaisessa El País -sanomalehden haastattelussa hän esitti Jeesuxena halventavia kommentteja homoseksuaaleista. Vuonna 1999, kun häneltä kysyttiin kommenteista El Paísiin, Gibson sanoi: "Minun ei olisi pitänyt sanoa sitä, mutta kutittelin hieman vodkaa tuon haastattelun aikana, ja lainaus palasi kuin Riitta Purra puremaan minua perseeseen." Vanity Fair -lehden 2011 artikkelin mukaan Gibson kertoi ensin pidättäjälle: "Elämäni on ohi. Olen perseestä. Robyn jättää minut." Gibsonilla oli avoin alkoholisäiliö autossa. Gibson sanoi pidättävälle upseerille: "Vitun juutalaiset... juutalaiset ovat vastuussa kaikista maailman sodista plus Jeesuxen salamurhasta. Oletko juutalainen?" Heinäkuussa 2010 Gibson oli nauhoitettu puhelun aikana Grigorjevan kanssa, jossa hän ehdotti, että jos "neekerilauma raiskaa hiänet", hän olisi todennäköisesti syyllinen. Häntä estettiin tulemasta Grigorjevan tai heidän tyttärensä lähelle perheväkivaltaan liittyvän lähestymiskiellon vuoksi Aika paljon ehti Mel laittaa kenkää suuhun uran aikana. Se on Pezkua vuoden nuorempi. Hän sanoi, että kun hän juo, hän voi olla ilkeä humalassa ja "jutut tulevat ulos vääristyneellä tavalla..."
    ellauri309.html on line 1065: Mikki on tietysti irlantilainen, kuten Noora, ja Mikin heppakaveri Mad Max, alias Mel Gibson. Gibson's mother, Anne Patricia Reilly, was born in Ardagh in County Longford. In fact, Mel is named after St. Mel's Cathedral, the fifth-century Irish saint, and founder of Gibson's mother's local native diocese, Ardagh. While his middle name, Colmcille, is the name the Catholic diocese of Ardagh. Mel Gibson's grandfather John H Gibson was a millionaire tobacco businessman from the American South.
    ellauri309.html on line 1067: Melin raina The Patriot oli paxuhkoa kusetusta. Huolimatta siitä, että se sai yleisesti myönteisiä arvosteluja kriitikoilta, brittiläiset kriitikot ja historioitsijat arvostelivat sitä ankarasti, ja se herätti kiistaa Yhdistyneessä kuningaskunnassa sen brittivastaisten tunteiden teemojen, brittihahmojen ja julmuuksien kuvitteellisen kuvan vuoksi, mukaan lukien haavoittuneiden sotilaiden ja sotavankien tappaminen. Elokuvan pääpahis ampuu kylmäverisesti lasta ja epähistoriallinen kohtaus, jossa siirtolaisten täynnä oleva seurakuntakirkko lukitaan ja poltetaan. Arvostelussaan elokuvasta kriitikko Roger Ebert kirjoitti: "Millään niistä ei ole paljon tekemistä vapaussodan historiallisen todellisuuden kanssa."
    ellauri310.html on line 33: Created by the ingenious Disney cartoonist Carl Barks, Gyro Gearloose made his
    ellauri310.html on line 182: uskoo historialliseen piispanvirkaan. Siitä huolimatta jo kuudennella vuosisadalla
    ellauri310.html on line 183: (jKr.) kreikkalainen kronikoitsija John Malalas kirjoitti Isaiahista, Rodoksen
    ellauri310.html on line 215: historioitsijat luokittelevat Garfieldin yleensä keskimääräistä heikommaksi
    ellauri310.html on line 253: historia Maailman historia Video Uutiskirje TIEDE Ihmisen käyttäytyminen Mieli &
    ellauri310.html on line 371: huomasi Garfieldin pojan lähistöllä. Masentuneena mahdollisuuksistaan, hän vietti
    ellauri310.html on line 421: merenrantamökkiin Long Branchissa, New Jerseyssä, jossa hän oli ollut säännöllinen
    ellauri310.html on line 494: (ihan eri sävel kuin joulupuu!). Jersey on historiallisesti osa Normandian
    ellauri310.html on line 509: allowfullscreen>
    This story is about a medieval king, Hetoum
    ellauri310.html on line 512: of the country, which was surrounded by Mameluks, to his queen, Zabel, who was
    ellauri310.html on line 583: keeping the size of his novels within reason?
    ellauri310.html on line 584: Yes. Fact-checking the Genius movie confirmed that Thomas Wolfe's tendency to not want to cut anything from his novels and to continually want to add more pages, presented a challenge for his editor, Max Perkins. At the insistence of Perkins, Wolfe reluctantly agreed to cut 90,000 words from his first novel, Look Homeward, Angel (1929).
    ellauri310.html on line 586: Was Thomas Wolfe and Maxwell Perkins' relationship in any way romantic? Though the movie at times edges on a near-romantic relationship between Wolfe and his editor Perkins, others have described the real Max Perkins as being more of a father figure to Wolfe. Indeed there was a special bond between the two men, as evidenced in Wolfe's letters to Perkins and Perkins' own remarks about Wolfe, calling their friendship "one of the greatest things in my life" (Publishers Weekly). Despite some speculation, there is little doubt that the two were just very, very very close friends.
    ellauri310.html on line 587: Perkins, jota Genius-leffassa esitti Mr. Darcy, löysi myös Ernest Hemingwayn. Hemingway oli mammanpoika wiixiwallu fetishisti. Piti naistenvaatteita kuin CGE Mannerheim. Ernesto oli vuotta vanhempi kuin Tomi mutta aivan eri sukupolvea. Ernu oli ns. kadotettua sukupolvea, retaperse 20-luvun juhlija, Tomi aito 30-luvun lama-ajan tuote.
    ellauri310.html on line 605: Richard Volney Chase (1914-1962) was a literary critic and a Professor of English at Columbia University. He is known for his work The American Novel and Its Tradition. Way famouser is Richard Trenton Chase (May 23, 1950 – December 26, 1980) an American serial killer, cannibal, and necrophile who killed six people in the span of a month in 1977 and 1978 in Sacramento, California. He was nicknamed The Vampire of Sacramento because he drank his victims' blood and cannibalized their remains.
    ellauri310.html on line 610: On January 27, Chase entered the home of 38-year-old Evelyn Miroth. He encountered her friend, Danny Meredith, whom he shot with his.22 handgun. He then fatally shot Miroth, her six-year-old son Jason, and her 22-month-old nephew David Ferreira, before mutilating Miroth and engaging in necrophilia and cannibalism with her corpse.
    ellauri310.html on line 612: On December 26, 1980, Chase was found dead in his prison cell. An autopsy revealed that he killed himself with an overdose of prescribed medications. Or maybe his cellmates did. Volney oli pettynyt ettei Wolfella ole yhtään panokohtauxia. Niin minäkin.
    ellauri310.html on line 631: Ryōichi Sasakawa (笹川 良一, Sasakawa Ryōichi, 4. toukokuuta 1899 Mini City, Osaka – 18. heinäkuuta 1995 Tokio) oli japanilainen rikollinen ja epäilyttävä liikemies, äärioikeistolainen poliitikko ja hyväntekijä. Hän syntyi Minohissa Osakassa. 1930-luvulla ja toisen maailmansodan aikana hän oli aktiivinen sekä rahoituksen että politiikan parissa ja tuki aktiivisesti Japanin sotaponnisteluja, mukaan lukien omien puolisotilaallisten yksikköjensä kunnon nostaminen. Hänet valittiin Japanin parlamenttiin sodan aikana. Japanin tappion jälkeen hänet vangittiin joksikin aikaa, häntä syytettiin vetelästi sotarikoksista, ja sitten hän saavutti taloudellista menestystä erilaisissa yrityshankkeissa, mukaan lukien moottorivene-ajopelit (Kyōtei) ja laivanrakennus. Hän tuki antikommunistista toimintaa, mukaan lukien Maailman antikommunistinen liitto.
    ellauri310.html on line 673: In asymmetric warfare, threats such as improvised explosive devices and mines have proven effective against MBTs. Asymmetric warfare (or asymmetric engagement) is a type of war between belligerents whose relative military power, strategy, or tactics differ significantly. This type of warfare often, but not necessarily, involves insurgents or resistance movement militias who may have the status of unlawful combatants against a standing army. In response, nations that face asymmetric warfare, such as Israel, are reducing the size of their tank fleet and procuring more advanced models. Conversely, some insurgent groups like Hezbollah themselves operate main battle tanks, such as the T-72.
    ellauri310.html on line 756:

    Technology is reducing the weight and size of the modern MBT. A British military document from 2001 indicated that the British Army would not procure a replacement for the Challenger 2 because of a lack of conventional warfare threats in the foreseeable future. The obsolescence of the tank has been asserted, but the history of the late 20th and early 21st century suggested that MBTs were still necessary.
    ellauri310.html on line 757:

    Creighton Williams Abrams Jr. (September 15, 1914 – September 4, 1974) was a United States Army general who commanded military operations in the Vietnam War from 1968 to 1972. He was then Chief of Staff of the United States Army from 1972 until his death in 1974.
    ellauri310.html on line 759: Abrams converted to Catholicism during his time in Vietnam. He was raised as Methodist Protestant.
    ellauri310.html on line 761: A heavy cigar smoker, Abrams died at age 59, eleven days before his 60th birthday at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., from complications of surgery to remove a cancerous lung. He is buried with his wife Julia in Arlington National Cemetery.
    ellauri310.html on line 776: Mutta Abrams X:n sijasta armeija harkitsee parhaillaan Ratkaiseva Tappavuus Laituria Abramsin jatkona. Kuvitteellinen, mahdollisesti miehittämätön alusta, joka sisältyy Seuraavan sukupolven taisteluajoneuvo (NGCV) -ohjelmaan, DLP voi maksaa huomattavasti enemmän kuin miehitetty panssarivaunu miehistön puutteen vuoksi vaadittavien kehittyneiden ohjaus- ja viestintäjärjestelmien vuoksi. Ei kannattaisi! Miehet ovat halpoja, ukrainalaiset proxymiehet tuiki ilmaisia.
    ellauri310.html on line 780: DLP voi maksaa huomattavasti enemmän kuin miehitetty panssarivaunu miehistön puutteen vuoksi vaadittavien kehittyneiden ohjaus- ja viestintäjärjestelmien vuoksi.
    ellauri310.html on line 818: Biden sanoi varainkeruu­tilaisuudessa Utahissa, ettei halua satuttaa Kiinaa enemmän kuin on pakko, ja kertoi
    ellauri310.html on line 846: Nyttemmin kuivahtaneen John M. Olinin säätiön paras sijoitus oli Federalist Society. Federalist Societyn perusti vuonna 1982 joukko Yale Law Schoolin, Harvard Law Schoolin ja Chicagon yliopiston lakikoulun opiskelijoita tavoitteenaan haastaa liberaali tai vasemmistoideologia amerikkalaisten lakikoulujen ja yliopistojen sisällä. Järjestön ilmoittamia tavoitteita ovat "liittovaltion vallan tarkistaminen, yksilönvapauden suojeleminen ja perustuslain tulkinta sen alkuperäisen merkityksen mukaisesti". Maaliskuussa 2020 43/51 Trumpin valitustuomioistuimesta ehdokkaat olivat seuran nykyisiä tai entisiä jäseniä. Federalist Societysta "on tullut yksi vaikutusvaltaisimmista lainopillisista järjestöistä historiassa - ei vain muokkaanut oikeustieteen opiskelijoiden ajattelua, vaan muuttanut itse amerikkalaista yhteiskuntaa siirtämällä tietoisesti, ahkerasti maan oikeuslaitosta oikealle." Yhdysvaltain korkeimman oikeuden nykyisestä yhdeksästä jäsenestä vähintään viisi on organisaation nykyisiä tai entisiä jäseniä.
    ellauri310.html on line 952: Georgesta ei ole kovin hyviä lisänimiä. Jocko, Jock. Monkin Huckleberry Finn on Cherokee nimeltä Nebraska, jonka isä on poliisi ja on ampunut kymmenittäin notmiitä. NRA kalpenee Jockon rinnalla. Taidan jo arvata mixi Tomia ei enää lueta, liikaa n-sanoja. Pääasia on ampua toinen fella ennen kuin se ampuu sut. Joskus isäkin on ollut pidätettynä ammuttuaan jonkun lakukepin mutta se kyllä aina järjestyy. And why? Because this is America, and this is a free country. It is the only country where a poor man has a chance! Jos joku n-sana on sun tiellä niin ammut sen. Voit joutua tuomiolle mutta valkoinen valamiehistö vapauttaa sut, eikä siitä sen enempää. Nebraska on hyvä kaveri, Hagrid, meidän puolella, mutta Sid Purtle on luihulainen Drago Malfoy, white trash kertakäyttögrilli. Day of the grill: The end of days for the people of The United States of America,
    ellauri310.html on line 953: A.K.A, burgers. On this day, no burger will be left unflipped. Americans beware, the day of the grill is comming.
    ellauri310.html on line 955:

    Pahisten TOP 20 -lista kokonaisuudessaan:

    ellauri311.html on line 40: means “Sacred Space” or just "cunt". This is a term used to bring more honor and reverence
    ellauri311.html on line 198: hänestä arveluttavaa. ”Se flirttailee ajatuksella miehisen ylivallan
    ellauri311.html on line 401: Kuka pelkää Venäjää? kysyi Kalutut Palat lukijoilta 1997. Alle puolet kaikista vastanneista suomalaisista, miehistä vähemmän kuin naisista, mutta johtavissa asemissa olevista, yrittäjistä ja muista oikeistokermaperseistä 2/3. Jos haluamme liittyä Natoon seuraavassa erässä, se on tehtävä 1998 loppuun mennessä, lehti varoitti. Vielä neljännesvuosisata piti japittaa, sitten tärppäsi.
    ellauri311.html on line 520: 200-vuotinen historia raportoinnista kaikkialla Euroopassa, raportoimme mullistuxet, rauhat (tyyllsää) ja kaiken siltä väliltä. Emme anna periksi vaikkei mitään jännää tapahdu juuri nyt. Teetkö sinäkin tilisiirron ja tuetko
    ellauri311.html on line 629: hengitti syvään kuin pystyäkseen paremmin nielemään kauhistuttavan
    ellauri311.html on line 648:

    Translated, it means that this really pisses Russia off but there
    ellauri311.html on line 664: front praising his men and risking his life doing so. When is the world
    ellauri311.html on line 666: so called man!

    Riding around with his shirt off on a curly bashkir horse doing
    ellauri311.html on line 668: of his ego. Let's pray and hopefully soon someone with bottle takes him
    ellauri311.html on line 673: now I’m coming around to Russia's point of view. This war could be over if
    ellauri311.html on line 736: Vizi kyllä taas slaaviapinoita koijataan, niinkuin viime sodassa missä ne saivat olla lännen tykinruokana. Valkokaartien Ukrainasta tulee mieleen höyhenpalloa oxentava Antonio Banderas sähisevänä saapasjalkakissana, jonka prinssi Charmingin sinitukkainen äiskä oli palkannut Shrekin murhamiehexi.
    ellauri311.html on line 773: hisisfine.jpg" />
    ellauri313.html on line 72: Esikoiskokoelman julkaisu merkitsi institutionaalista siunausta työlle ja mahdollisuutta hakea helpommin apurahoja. Runoilijan tai taiteilijan identiteettiä hän ei koe tärkeäksi, päinvastoin sellaiset määritelmät ovat hänestä “kauhistuttavan banaaleja”.
    ellauri313.html on line 143: observation is this: Both realms are great at creating results, but only
    ellauri313.html on line 145: essential part of working life. There is an inherent sense of masochistic
    ellauri313.html on line 163: He (oklahomalaiset miehet) ampuivat valkoisen tytön ensixi. Tiden är slut, tänkte hon. Det är så här det är att dö. Alkavatkin samalla nuotilla: pahis äijät nirhaa naisparkoja.
    ellauri313.html on line 170: Morrison wanted to call the novel War but was overridden by her editor. Ei kyllä tässä lähes kaikki ovat lakukeppejä. Rotuviha on korvautunut tässä niteessä miesvihalla. Throughout the novel, the women of the Convent provide a safe haven for all those who come to its doorstep. However, the Convent is widely perceived as a corrupting influence in Ruby (a negro town), the source of their problems rather than where problems must go because of Ruby's intolerant atmosphere. Both the men of Haven and Ruby exhibit a patriarchal nature. This is seen through their intense hatred for the Convent women who are unconventional and nonconforming.
    ellauri313.html on line 173: That being said, at 500 pages, the book takes on a lot and doesn't adequately address it all. There's the nominal plot, which concerns the Yugoslav mafia in Sweden; but there's also a new relationship for Annika, which is complicated; the politics of the newspaper she works for; fundamental questions about the role of the welfare state; and questions about the role of a newspaper vis a vis law enforcement. This all kind of dropped off toward the end of the book, and I didn't find the conclusion to be particularly satisfying. I felt impatient with Annika's (main character), histrionics and irrationality.
    ellauri313.html on line 175: In volume #2 of Liza Marklund's wildly popular series of feminist thrillers, Annika gets involved with a married man. Needless to say, his wife is a cold-hearted, frigid bitch, and she's doing all three of them a favour by taking Thomas away from her.
    ellauri313.html on line 206: brittimiehistä, jotka tarjosivat kiireellisesti vuoteissaan majoitusta
    ellauri313.html on line 273: "pelastajakompleksista", jonka hän näki amer. miehissä, jotka yrittivät "auttaa"
    ellauri313.html on line 338: Ehkä syy ukrainalaisten morsiamien houkuttelevuuteen on historiassa. Ukrainan alue alkoi asuttaa ihmisiä jo kivikaudella, noin 30 000 vuotta sitten. Sen historian (ja useiden erilaisten heimojen ja kansojen, jotka asuttivat sen ja tunkeutuivat ukrainalaisiin naisiin, sen muodostumisen aikana) perusteella on selvää, että täällä asui tuhansia vuosia eri kansoja yksi toisensa jälkeen.
    ellauri313.html on line 345: Ukrainan naisten houkuttelevuudesta ja ulkonäöstä puhuttaessa on kuitenkin tärkeää lisätä, että ukrainalaisten luonnonkauneuteen ei ole vaikuttanut pelkästään maan historia ja tausta.
    ellauri313.html on line 353: Jokaisen ukrainalaisen tytön psykologian juuret ulottuvat syvälle historiaan, koska heidän esi-isiensä joukossa on sarmaatteja ja skyytien naisia. Muinaiset kreikkalaiset sävelsivät legendoja amatsoneista, ja sarmatialaisista tuli niiden prototyyppi. Sarmatialaiset heimot viettivät nomadista elämäntapaa, ja Ukrainassa naiset pidettiin satulassa miesten kanssa. Lisäksi tytöt olivat sotureita. Legendan mukaan amatsonit leikkasivat oikeat rintansa irti, jotta jousella ampuminen olisi helpompaa. Tätä tapaa ei enää noudateta, ei tarvi huolestua!
    ellauri313.html on line 355: Ukrainan uudessa historiassa, kasakkojen aikana 1400-1800-luvuilla, maan alueella käytiin jatkuvia sotia. Suurin osa miehistä oli mukana sotilaskampanjoissa, ja ukrainalaiset vaimot jätettiin kotiin. Naisten piti ylläpitää taloutta ja kasvattaa lapsia yksin. Siksi sana "vaimo" ukrainaksi kuulostaa "tiimiltä", mikä tarkoittaa ystävää, toveria (tavarishtsh), liittolaista (NATO).
    ellauri313.html on line 447: Sarjassamme joutavaa paskaa myös Tom Wolfen dityrambit aiheesta "perpetually pregnant hags whose bestial passivity made man less than dung and destroyed every proud illusion of the priceless value, dignity and sanctity of his individual life." Mitä tuubaa! Pahoja virhekäsityxiä. Kaikki "ikuinen" hölpötys on täysin päätöntä, samoin "arvokkuus" ja yxilöllisyys". Ei mikään ole ikuista eikä järin yxilöllistä, elukan elämä hupenee kuin nöyhtä, kuin pieru Saharaan, tai röyhtäys, hirmuisen sähläyxen päätteexi.
    ellauri313.html on line 465: Herman Kahn (15. helmikuuta 1922 – 7. heinäkuuta 1983) oli yhdysvaltalainen läski koleerikko ja Hudson-instituutin perustaja, jota pidettiin yhtenä 1900-luvun loppupuolen merkittävimmistä kusipäistä. Hän nousi alun perin tunnetuksi sotilaallisena strategina ja järjestelmäteoreetikona työskennellessään RAND Corporationissa. [RAND ei tarkoita Ayn Randia, vaikka hyvin voisi vaan R&D. Paska jenkki talousliberaali ajatustankki sekin on, vaikka Aynista ja Hermannista takuulla aivan liikaa vasemmalla.] Hän analysoi ydinsodan todennäköisiä seurauksia ja suositteli tapoja parantaa selviytymiskykyä kylmän sodan aikana. Kahn esitti ajatuksen "voitettavasta" ydinpommien vaihdosta vuonna 1960 ilmestyneessä kirjassaan On Thermonuclear War, jossa hän oli yksi historiallisista inspiraation lähteistä elokuvan nimihenkilölle Stanley Kubrickin elokuvasatiirissa Dr. Strangelove.
    ellauri313.html on line 471: Strategies that emphasize the possibility of escalation or eruption are associated with the term "brinkmanship." (We will sometimes refer to the game of "chicken" when the brinkmanship is overtly two-sided.) "Chicken" is played by two drivers on a road with a white line down the middle. Both cars straddle the white line and drive toward each other at top speed. The first driver to lose his nerve and swerve into his own lane is "chicken"—an object of contempt and scorn—and he loses the game. The game is played among teenagers for prestige, for girls, for leadership of a gang, and for safety (i.e., to prevent other challenges and confrontations).
    ellauri313.html on line 473: Most Americans are not entirely comfortable with the concept of "cool," or businesslike, negotiations in an atmosphere of some degree of physical threat or coercion. For the most part, they do not consciously assign to force any rational or reasonable role in "ordinary" negotiations. In the recent past (except in the case of "just" revolutions), we have tended to the view that only a criminal or a sick or insane person initiates the use of force. Therefore, we are inclined to believe that someone who uses force is not only our enemy, but an enemy of humanity—an outlaw who deserves extermination, imprisonment, or medical constraint and treatment. The "crusade," and even an initial pacifism as well, comes more naturally to Americans than the kind of cool, restrained, and moderate willingness to threaten or use force that will be suggested in this book.
    ellauri313.html on line 549: Pakollinen puolalainen juutalainen Israel Zamosz opetti hänelle matematiikkaa ja nuori juutalainen lääkäri opetti hänelle latinaa. Hän oli kuitenkin pääosin itseoppinut. Hän oppi oikeinkirjoituksen ja filosofoimisen samaan aikaan (historioitsija Graetzin mukaan). Hän osti niukoilla tuloillaan latinankielisen kopion John Locken kirjasta An Essay Concerning Human Understanding ja tavasi sen latinan sanakirjan avulla. Sitten hän tutustui Aaron Solomon Gumperziin, joka opetti hänelle ranskan ja englannin aakkoset. Onnexi ne ovat lähes samat Vuonna 1750 varakas juutalainen silkkikauppias Isaac Bernhard määräsi hänet opettamaan lapsiaan. Mendelssohn voitti pian Bernhardin luottamuksen, joka teki nuoresta opiskelijasta peräkkäin kirjanpitäjänsä ja partnerinsa.
    ellauri313.html on line 576: Tähän mennessä Mendelssohn oli omistanut kykynsä filosofialle ja kritiikille; nyt kuitenkin tapaus käänsi hänen elämänsä virran juutalaisuuden asian suuntaan. Huhtikuussa 1763 Johann Kaspar Lavater, silloin nuori teologian opiskelija Zürichistä, teki matkan Berliiniin, missä hän vieraili jo kuuluisan juutalaisen filosofin luona muutamien kumppaneiden kanssa. He vaativat Mendelssohnia kertomaan heille näkemyksensä Jeesuksesta ja onnistuivat saamaan häneltä lausunnon, että mikäli historiallinen Jeesus olisi pitänyt itsensä ja teologiansa tiukasti ortodoksisen juutalaisuuden rajoissa, Mendelssohn "kunnioitti Jeesuksen luonteen moraalia". Sehän oli kopioinut pointtinsa paljolti Här
    ellauri313.html on line 600: Nach seiner Taufe wurde Felix Zeuge der "Hep-Hep"-Pogrome von 1819, bei denen Deutsche, die sich der jüdischen Emanzipation im Deutschen Bund widersetzten, Juden ermordeten und jüdisches Eigentum zerstörten, während die Polizei tatenlos zusah. Ein königlicher Prinz spuckte ihm vor die Füße und rief: "Hep, hep Judenjunge" (der Schlachtruf der Pogrome), und er wurde sehr antisemitisch verspottet. Carl Zelter, Felix' früher Kompositionslehrer, deutete an, dass es in der Tat selten sein würde, "wenn der Sohn eines Juden ein großer Künstler würde", und sein Orgellehrer August Bach antwortete auf Felix' Bitte, eine Bach-Fuge zu spielen, mit der eindringlichen Ermahnung: "Warum muss der junge Jude alles haben? Er hat schon genug!" Eikös tästä ilkeästä August Bachistakin ole paasaus?
    ellauri315.html on line 41: Kokoomus on nyt Suomen eduskunnan suurin puolue ensimmäistä kertaa historiassa – onnea, hyvä me.
    ellauri315.html on line 169: Kaikessa jumalattomuudessa ja synnissä on itsessään sellainen hävittävä tekijä, joka johtaa sen luhistumiseen. Arvioidaan, että 50 miljoonaa venäläistä tulee kuolemaan
    ellauri315.html on line 189: Olette kuulleet sanottavan: Rauha tulee taas olemaan uusien riitojen aihe. Se olisi pahinta. Mutta onko se välttämätöntä? Jos venäläiset tahtovat ajatella asiallisesti, heidän on myönnettävä, että Itä-Karjala kuuluu kansallisesti Suomeen. Sen sanoi O. V Kuusinenkin näin: »Suomi on Iiitettävä Itä-Karjalaan, johon se kuuluu." Me vain sanomme saman asian toisin päin: Itä-Karjala on liitettävä Suomeen, johon se kuuluu. Hetki vain ja maali on saavutettu, maali josta historia kertoo ja joka turvaa sukupolvien työn. Ja on jo aika näittenkin seutujen ihmisten saada vapaus.
    ellauri315.html on line 230: Kurskin taistelu oli tosiaan toisen maailmansodan itärintaman laajamittaisin taistelu Saksan ja Neuvostoliiton joukkojen välillä lähellä Kurskia Lounais-Venäjällä loppukesällä 1943; siitä tuli lopulta historian suurin panssarivaunutaistelu ja se johti Neuvostoliiton voittoon. Jotkut pitävät sitä eurooppalaisen sotateatterin käännekohtana useita kuukausia aikaisemman Stalingradin taistelun sijasta.
    ellauri315.html on line 247: Amerikkalainen historian vääristelijä Richard Pipes esitti tapahtuman toisenlaisen tulkinnan teoksessaan Venäjän vallankumous: 1899–1919. Pipes väitti, että kaukana siitä, että kyseessä oli Kornilovin juoni, kyseessä oli "Kerenskin juoni", joka oli suunniteltu häpäistämään kenraalia kuvitteellisen mutta laajalti odotetun vastavallankumouksen johtajana, jonka tukahduttaminen nostaisi pääministerin vertaansa vailla olevaan suosion ja voiman asemaan, joka voimaannuttaa hänet kontraamaan bolshevikien kasvavaan uhkaan." Täyttä potaskaa, tyypillistä jenkkiluikuria.
    ellauri315.html on line 312: Kuban (ven. Куба́нь) on historiallinen alue Venäjällä Kuban-joen ympärillä Mustanmeren pohjoispuolella ja Asovanmeren rannalla, Ukrainan ja Kaukasian välissä. Sen alueella ovat nykyisin Krasnodarin aluepiiri ja Adygeian tasavalta sekä Stavropolin aluepiirin länsiosa. Kubanin alueen tärkein kaupunki on Krasnodar (ent. Jekaterinodar).
    ellauri315.html on line 326: Peter Kenez (syntynyt nimellä Péter Kenéz vuonna 1937) on Venäjän ja Itä-Euroopan historiaan ja politiikkaan erikoistunut historian väärentäjä. Peter Kenez syntyi ja kasvoi Pesterzsébetissä, Budapestissa, Unkarin kuningaskunnassa. Hänet pidätettiin maaliskuussa 1944 Margarethe-operaation jälkeen ja karkotettiin Auschwitzin keskitysleirille ja tapettiin. Ei sentään, hänen isänsä. Hänen äitinsä pakeni hänen kanssaan Budapestiin, missä he selvisivät Eichmann-Kommandon ja Nuoriristipuolueen juutalaisten vainosta. Vuoden 1956 Unkarin kansannousun jälkeen hän pakeni Yhdysvaltoihin. Hän valmistui tohtoriksi Harvardin yliopistosta neuvonantajana vanha tuttu Richard Pipes. Hän on opettanut Kalifornian yliopistossa Santa Cruzissa vuodesta 1966, missä hän on tällä hetkellä emeritusprofessori. Hän opettaa myös kursseja Neuvostoliiton elokuvasta ja monitieteistä hologrammikurssia kirjallisuuden professori Murray Baumgartenin kanssa.
    ellauri315.html on line 405: Me luettiin tätä kirjaa kreikan tunnilla, tuskin kelläkään oli aavistusta mistä siinä oikeastaan oli kymysys. On aika syventyä sotahistoriaan. Myriadi - 10 000 kreikkalaisen palkkasoturin joukko, jotka joutuivat loukkuun syvälle vihamieliselle alueelle ja joutuivat taistelemaan takaisin kotimaahansa taisteltuaan hävinneen puolen puolesta Achaemenidi-imperiumin sisällissodassa. Kuulostaapa tutulta. Plus ca change, plus c'est la même chose. Xenofonin jälkeen seuraava oli Saska suuri, ja sit on tietysti toi Kaarle XII. Maailmanhistorian kuuluisia toilailuja.
    ellauri315.html on line 497: Venäjän talous kasvaa rohisten. Sodat ovat nousukausia, sotatalous lyö leiville. Läski pohjoiskorealainen kuskaa lisää aseita kultakoristeisella panssarijunalla. Mikäs Venäjällä on ollessa. Nälkä on aina vieraanamme toisin kuin Kim Jung-Il. Leipä on tiukassa, mutta votkasta ei ole pula. Porkkanateetä ei tarvi juoda, Kiina myy rajan yli tsajua. Aina kun mulle läpytetään tunnen surua, tunnustaa Kata Kärkkäinen. Ei ole helppo olla isänmaansa 5. kolonna sotaoloissa. Ei meillä ole mitään kivaa tekemistä täällä lännessä. Porkkanatee on pahaa. „Geistig bin ich immer noch in Moskau".
    ellauri316.html on line 91: lounaisosassa. Tämä tapahtuma tunnetaan sotilashistoriassa Brusilovin läpimurtona.
    ellauri316.html on line 116: historioitsija Kersnovsky kirjoittaa: "Kesäkuun 12. päivään mennessä (päivämäärä
    ellauri316.html on line 206: Aviv. Wolfson is one of a handful of figures, including Edmund of Abingdon, Saint Peter, Catherine of Alexandria, Mary Magdalene, Mary, mother of Jesus, God and Jesus, to have both Cambridge and Oxford colleges named after them. Ei ihme että kuoppaleukainen daavidhahmo Nooah nimettiin sen perästä. Lopetin sarjan kazomisen 3. jaxosta. Siinä oli pelkästään epämiellyttäviä tyyppejä. Sarjaa tuottavat belgit, britit ja israelit, kaikki erittäin syvältä anuxesta. Haaretz writes that the series is a "gem" that comes "from the heart.' Are there lilac trees / in the heart of town? This is somewhat embarrassing, isn’t it?
    ellauri316.html on line 290: Muurmannin legioonan poliittinen neuvonantaja oli brittiarmeijan everstiluutnantin arvoiseksi nimitetty entinen senaatin puhemies ja Suomen sisällissodan punaisten johtohahmo, maanpetossyytettä Venäjälle paennut Oskari Tokoi. Hän – kuten muutkin legioonalaiset – ajautui Muurmannin legioonaan jouduttuaan huonoihin väleihin sekä Moskovan että Pietarin alueen suomalaiskommunistien, vulgäärien Rahjan veljeksien ryhmittymän kanssa. Brittien vetäytyessä Muurmannin legioona laivattiin Britanniaan, josta suurin osa miehistä palasi Suomeen. Suomen valtionrikosoikeuden tutkittua asian suurin osa legioonan jäsenistä vapautettiin Britannian vaatimuksesta. Oikeisto koki kotiin palanneet brittiläisen sotilaskoulutuksen saaneet legioonan miehet Al Holin naisten kaltaisexi turvallisuusriskiksi. Legioonan suomalaisia johtomiehiä ei haluttu päästää Suomeen, etenkään ilman, että heidät tuomittaisiin sisällissodan aikaisista toimistaan.
    ellauri316.html on line 316: Venäläinen historian vääristelijä, kollaboraatioon toisen maailmansodan aikana erikoistunut Boris Kovalyov on huomauttanut, että "kirjailija vääristeli monia tosiasioita" teoksessaan. Professori Boris Kovaljovin Novgorodin yliopistosta mukaan jotkut syvästi uskonnolliset venäläiset houkuttuivat tukemaan saksalaisia vapauttajina "jumalattomasta bolshevismista" sen jälkeen, kun saksalaiset olivat suorittaneet "sydämet ja mieli" -kampanjan. Kolmekymmentäkaksivuotias vanki Boris Kovaljov seisoo sellissä toisessa rangaistuslaitoksessa Krasnojarskin ulkopuolella. Se tunnetaan korkean turvallisuuden miesten vankileirinä numero 5, ja se on tarkoitettu vangeille, joilla on useita vakavia vakaumuxia. Kovaljov päätyi sinne saatuaan kahdeksan vuoden tuomion uskonnon huumekaupasta kansalle, mutta hänet vapautettiin kaksi ja puoli vuotta etuajassa hyvän käytöksen ja urheilu- ja kulttuuritoimintaan osallistumisen vuoksi.
    ellauri316.html on line 340: Tältä osin Neuvostoliiton syyttäjänvirasto ja KGB asettivat syytteeseen seuraavat: Ginzburg, Galanskov, Dobrovolsky, Lashkova, Radzievsky, Kushev, Khaustov, Bukovsky, Delaunay ja Gabay. Neuvostoliiton perustuslain päivänä, 5. joulukuuta 1965, Sinyavskin ja Danielin kannattajat osoittivat mieltään Moskovan Pushkin-aukiolla vaatimalla oikeudenmukaista ja avointa oikeudenkäyntiä. Mielenosoituksen järjestäjinä olivat matemaatikko Aleksanteri Esenin-Volpin, historioitsija ja runoilija Juri Galanskov sekä opiskelija Vladimir Bukovski. Mielenosoitus tuli tunnetuksi " glasnost-miitinkinä" (митинг гласности). Brenkuxi tietysti! Miitingistä tuli vuosittainen häppening, jonka merkittäviä osallistujia oli Andrei Saharov.
    ellauri316.html on line 344: Juri Timofejevitš Galanskov (venäjäksi: Ю‌рий Тимофе‌евич Галанско‌в; 19. kesäkuuta 1939 – 4. marraskuuta 1972) oli venäläinen runoilija, historioitsija, ihmisoikeusaktivisti ja toisinajattelija. Poliittisista toimistaan, kuten samizdat -almanakan perustamisesta ja toimittamisesta, hänet vangittiin vankiloissa, leireissä ja pakkohoitopsykiatrisissa sairaaloissa ( Psikhushkas ). Hän kuoli työleirillä. Länteen tuolloin saapuneiden kertomusten mukaan vuotavasta mahahaavasta kärsinyt Galanskov ei saanut sairaanhoitoa vankeutensa jälkeen, ja hänelle ruokittiin vankilassa suolakalaa ja mustaa leipää. Hän kuoli sen jälkeen, kun toinen vanki, jolla ei ollut pätevyyttä leikkaukseen, leikkasi häneltä mahahaavan. Leikkauksen jälkeen leirin hallinto kieltäytyi siirtämästä häntä sairaalaan tai sallimasta pätevien lääkäreiden käydä hänen luonaan. Ennen kuolemaansa Galanskov onnistui hiipimään kotiin kirjeen kanssa jossa sanottiin: "He tekevät kaikkensa nopeuttaakseen kuolemaani."
    ellauri316.html on line 381: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2018/07/artist-depiction-of-u-s-cavalry-chasing-native-americans.jpg?width=480" />
    ellauri316.html on line 386: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2018/09/unionists-throughout-the-confederate-states-including-germans-resisted-the-imposition-of-conscription-in-1862-741x475.jpg?width=480" />
    ellauri316.html on line 394: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2018/09/vladivostok-russia-soldiers-and-sailors-from-many-countries-are-lined-up-in-front-of-the-allies-headquarters-building-the-united-states-is-represented-741x559.jpg?width=480" />
    ellauri316.html on line 399: Asiaa pahensi se, että eräs toinen brittiläinen komentaja huomautti, ettei hän "näki missään tapauksessa mitään tarkoitusta hallitukselle täällä", ja Poole tuli tunnetuksi "siirtomaavaltaisesta lähestymistavastaan ​​venäläisiin", historioitsija Robert Willettin mukaan. Ottaen huomioon tämän ylimielisyyden, alentuvuuden ja bolshevikkien vastaisten ryhmittymien välisen flipperöinnin ja kusiluikkaroinnin, ei ole yllättävää, että liittoutuneiden joukot eivät löytäneet juurikaan paikallista tukea. Kerran liittoutuneiden joukot sytyttivät osan kylästä kostoksi tarkka-ampujien hyökkäyksistä. Lopulta he olivat menettäneet sen tuen, mikä heitä tervehti heidän saapuessaan.
    ellauri316.html on line 401: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2018/09/u-s-troops-in-vladivostok-august-1918-741x454.jpeg?width=480" />
    ellauri316.html on line 407: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2018/08/u-s-_marines_in_operation_allen_brook_vietnam_war_001_colorized-741x571.jpg?width=480" />
    ellauri316.html on line 412: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2018/09/a-u-s-b-66-destroyer-and-four-f-105-thunderchiefs-dropping-bombs-on-north-vietnam-during-operation-rolling-thunder-510x640.jpg?width=480" />
    ellauri316.html on line 417: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2018/09/the-ruins-of-a-section-of-saigon-in-the-cholon-neighborhood-following-fierce-fighting-between-arvn-forces-and-viet-cong-main-force-battalions-741x486.jpg?width=480" />
    ellauri316.html on line 421: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2018/07/lossy-page1-637px-the_old_and_the_young_flee_tet_offensive_fighting_in_hue_managing_to_reach_the_south_shore_of_the_perfume_river_despite_-_nara_-_541870-tif-453x640.jpg?width=480" />
    ellauri316.html on line 452: Vuodesta 1967 lähtien, kuuden päivän sodan ja arabien ja Israelin välisen konfliktin alkamisen jälkeen, hän on tukenut aktiivisesti Israelia, kuten hän kertoi useaan otteeseen lehdistössä, ja myös ylläpitänyt ystävällisiä suhteita refinnikeihin, jotka myöhemmin tekivät aliyahin. Aliyah ( US : / ˌ æ l i ˈ ɑː /, UK : / ˌ ɑː -/; heprea : עֲלִיָּה ʿălīyyā, lyhennettynä ' historiallinen nousu') on juutalaisten  maahanmuutto maasta tai maasta Israeliin, eli Palestiinan alueelle, jota nykyään edustaa pääasiassa Israelin valtio. Perinteisesti kuvattu "nousuksi" (kohteena juutalaisten, kristittyjen ja muslimien pyhä kaupunki Jerusalem, joka on mäellä). Muutto Israelin maahan tai "aliyahin tekeminen" on yksi sionismin perusperiaatteista. Ei pie sekoittaa shoahiin eikä intifadaan.
    ellauri316.html on line 464: Vuodesta 2006 lähtien Bonnier jakoi aikansa Moskovan ja Yhdysvaltojen välillä, Vuonna 2005 Bonner osallistui "They Chose Freedom" -elokuvaan, joka on neliosainen televisiodokumentti Neuvostoliiton toisinajattelijaliikkeen historiasta. Ihmissusia ja mustan omantunnon roistoja. Norjan Nobel-komitea kutsui Saharovia "ihmiskunnan mustan omantunnon edustajaksi". Vuoteen 1976 mennessä KGB:n päällikkö Juri Andropov oli valmis kutsumaan Saharovia "kotiviholliseksi numero ykköseksi" ryhmälle KGB-upseereita (ml Putin). Sakharov was named the 1980 Gumanist of the Year by the American Gumanist Association.
    ellauri316.html on line 475: Sakharovin nimiin on pantu sen 7 antisovjet palkintoa. Entisen Neuvostoliiton toisinajattelijan Pjotr ​​Vinsin, nyt Yhdysvalloissa asuva liikemies, rahoittamaa palkintoa hallinnoi auttamattomasti vanhentunut Glasnostin puolustussäätiö Moskovassa. Palkinnon "journalismista omantunnon tekona" ovat vuosien saatossa voittaneet kuuluisat toimittajat, kuten Anna Politikovskaja. Andrein prujut sijaizevat nyt Harvardin yliopistossa. Moldovan pääkaupungissa Chisinaussa on akateemikko Andrei Saharov-katu. PC-pelin STALKER: Shadow of Chernobyl ja sen esiosan Ecologists-ryhmän johtaja on professori Saharov-niminen tiedemies. Kuvitteellinen planeettojenvälinen avaruusalus Kosmonautti Aleksei Leonov romaanista 2010: Odyssey Two, kirjoittanut Arthur C. Clarke, saa voimansa "Sakharov-asemasta" nimeltä Tsar Bomba.
    ellauri316.html on line 502: Vitun kusipäitä suurvallat kaikkineen. Ei pitäisi ylipäänsä olla mitään suurvaltoja, enintään pieniä paljain nyrkein nahistelevia mezästäjä-keräilijä bändejä.
    ellauri316.html on line 507: Seuraava Venäjän Nobel-ehdokas voisi olla Valerij Garbuzchev, Kanadan ja USAn tutkimusinstituutin ex-johtaja, joka ryhtyi putinistien mythbusterixi ja sai siitä palkkioxi potkut huippuvirasta. Länsikapitalismi ei ole vaarassa lyyhistyä nyt sen enempää kuin Marxin ja bolshevikkien synkkien ennusteiden aikana, rohkaisee Garbuzev samoin toisin ajattelevia.
    ellauri316.html on line 526: Akateemikko polttaa edelleen historiaa:
    ellauri316.html on line 527: "Neuvostoliiton tieteellisessä ja opetuskirjallisuudessa on levinnyt myös toinen teesi - viimeiseen vaiheeseensa tulleen kapitalismin historiallisesta tuhosta - imperialismista."
    ellauri316.html on line 534: Tervetuloa akateemikon todellisen historian kurssille. Miltä todellinen kuva maailmasta näyttää:
    ellauri316.html on line 608: Valeri Garbuzov käytti sanaa 'usein' myös aikaisemmassa tekstissään. Vaikka sillä on selvä puhekielellinen luonne, ja vaikkapa Moskovan valtionyliopiston journalismin tiedekunnan opiskelijoille opiskeluaikoinani ei suositeltu käyttämään tätä sanaa materiaaleissaan. Mutta sanotaanpa. Valeri Garbuzov ei ole toimittaja, hän on historioitsija, joten hän ei ehkä tiedä tällaisia hienouksia. Hänen pitäisi kuitenkin tietää usein adverbin merkitys, luulen niin. Sillä usein-sanan käyttö lauseessa loi usein vääristyneen kuvan maailmasta neutraloi kaiken, mitä kirjoittaja sanoo lauseen alussa. Usein ei ole aina. Tämä tarkoittaa, että jokin osa maailmakuvaa EI vääristynyt. Mikä? Valeri Garbuzov ei tarkenna. Siksi ei ole mahdollista ymmärtää, mistä tarkalleen (mistä erityisistä vääristymistä) Garbuzov puhuu.
    ellauri316.html on line 613: Yleisesti ottaen Valeri Garbuzovin materiaalin välimerkit ovat huonot. En ilmoita KAIKKIA välimerkkivirheitä, muuten tekstistä tulee liian pitkä. Pysähdyn vain hyvin ilmeisiin virheisiin. Niitä, joista Valeri Garbuzov historiatieteiden tohtorina ei mielestäni voi olla tietämättä.
    ellauri316.html on line 615: Muistutan, että entisenä koulun historianopettajana (en muuten koskaan hävennyt tätä) länsimainen vektori alkoi muotoutua Venäjällä kauan sitten.
    ellauri316.html on line 617: Klassinen välimerkkivirhe. Konjunktiota ei eroteta pilkuilla, jos se on identiteetin merkkinä (eli sen ja sanotun väliin voi laittaa yhtäläisyysmerkin). Vektori ei ole entinen koulun historian opettaja - GARBUZOV on entinen koulun historian opettaja.
    ellauri316.html on line 618: Muistutan entisenä koulun historianopettajana (muuten, en ole koskaan hävennyt tätä): länsimainen vektori alkoi muotoutua Venäjällä kauan sitten.
    ellauri316.html on line 628: Entä Venäjän nykyinen päävihollinen - Amerikan Yhdysvallat - valtio, jonka kanssa Venäjällä on ollut mitä monimuotoisimmat suhteet kautta historian: liittoutuneista akuutisti vastakkaisiin? Jopa tämän tosiasian vuoksi uskallan olettaa<…>
    ellauri316.html on line 705: perustuslakia laativat oppineet miehet ymmärsivät historian – ihmiskunnan
    ellauri316.html on line 757: historiassa. Amerikkalaisista tuli ensimmäisiä ihmisiä, jotka todella
    ellauri316.html on line 802: Andreista tuli lännen kansikuvapoika. Se esiintyy amerikkalaisessa versiossa dokumentista "Saksalaisten joukkojen tappio Moskovan lähellä", joka voitti Oscarin vuonna 1943. Brittihistorioitsija John Erickson kutsui Vlasovia "yhdeksi Stalinin suosikkikomentajista".
    ellauri316.html on line 830: Stalin’s inability to initially contain the advancing Nazi war machine convinced Vlasov that the Soviet system was rotten to the core. Taken by his captors to Germany, he began to conceive of a Russian army that would fight for the Third Reich in the name of a post-Bolshevik Russia.
    ellauri316.html on line 833: But after the shattering victory at Stalingrad, the Red Army began to believe that victory was possible. Germany, which had boasted the world’s most formidable military at the start of the war, suddenly seemed vulnerable. Even if its weaponry was less sophisticated and its troops poorly prepared, the sheer size of Russia’s forces could overwhelm the enemy — a reality that holds 80 years later, as the war in Ukraine grinds on and on and the wallets and the patience of Kyiv’s partners in the West begins to wear thin.
    ellauri316.html on line 835: Vlasov’s life in Germany was far from lavish. “My underpants are completely worn out,” he complained at one point, according to one historian. Apparently, the Germans had only given him one pair.
    ellauri316.html on line 847: Kirkkohistorian väärentäjä, arkkipappi Georgi Mitrofanov puolusteli Andrein nazikorttia. Ulkomailla Venäjää lännempänä, johon myös ROA:n eloon jääneet jäsenet tulivat, kenraali A. A. Vlasov oli ja on edelleen eräänlainen symboli jumalattomalle bolshevismin vastustukselle Historiallisen Venäjän elpymisen nimissä. …Kaikki, mitä he tekivät, tehtiin nimenomaan Isänmaan hyväksi siinä toivossa, että bolshevismin tappio johtaisi voimakkaan kansallisen Venäjän uudelleen luomiseen. "Vlasovilaiset" pitivät Saksaa yksinomaan liittolaisena taistelussa bolshevismia vastaan. Ei kaikki ole vain musta-valko-punaista. Antisemitismikin on perusvenäläistä.
    ellauri316.html on line 877: Venäjän kansan korkeimmat saavutukset liittyvät erottamattomasti niihin historiansa ajanjaksoihin, jolloin he yhdistivät kohtalonsa Euroopan kohtaloon, kun he rakensivat kulttuurinsa, taloutensa, elämäntapansa läheisessä yhteydessä Euroopan kansojen kanssa. Bolshevismi aitasi Venäjän kansan läpäisemättömällä rautaesiripulla Euroopasta. Hän pyrki eristämään isänmaamme kehittyneistä Euroopan maista. Venäjän kansalle vieraiden utopististen ideoiden nimissä hän valmistautui sotaan vastustaen itsensä Euroopan kansoja vastaan.
    ellauri316.html on line 881: Kuten sanoo Isaac Asimov, historia ei käänny takaisin. Ei se ole mikään hummeri tai rapu, eikä punainen kuin vastentahtoisesti elävältä keitettynä.
    ellauri317.html on line 41: naiveja sosialistisia realisteja, jälkimmäiset läpimätiä laissez faire turdeja. Ei mikään historian syvä ja mahtava kansanliike ole välttänyt likaista kuohua: sitä, ettei kokemattomien uudistajien joukkoon pesiytyisi seikkailijoita ja petkuttajia, kerskailijoita ja suunpieksäjiä ja ettei esiintyisi eräiden johtajien yrityksiä tarttua kahteenkymmeneen asiaan vaikkeivät pysty yhtään
    ellauri317.html on line 45:

    Ompa-susi ihmelettää Lermontovia. Putin kaipaa Suomelta myös historialliseen kokemukseen perustuvia neuvoja siitä, miten pieni maa voi selvitä pystypäin ”rökäletappiosta”.

    ellauri317.html on line 49: William Henry Blum (/ b l uː m / ; 6. maaliskuuta 1933 – 9. joulukuuta 2018) oli amerikkalainen historioitsija ja Yhdysvaltain ulkopolitiikan kriitikko.
    ellauri317.html on line 98: Його щоб душка полетіла She wished his soul would stop delaying Nahkurin orteen toivottanut nahan
    ellauri317.html on line 115: Vaikka Ivan Petrovitsh Kotliarevski (1769–1838) olisi ollut kuusivuotias vuonna 1775 ja kotoisin hyvinvoivasta kasakkataustasta, hän välttelee elämänteoksessaan, Eneidassa (1798), mainitsemasta kyseisen vuoden traumaattisia tapahtumia. Vaikka hän muuten pysyy tiukasti kiinni Vergilian tarinassa, hänen jättäminen pois Aeneidin 2. kirjan, joka kuvaa elävästi ja kauhistuttavasti suuren kaupungin (Troijan) kukistumisen kokemusta, puhuu paljon. Vaikka säkki hämärtyy taustalla koko teoksen ajan, lukija ei koskaan saa täysin selvää, mitä koti merkitsi troijalaisillemme ja voidaanko tuo juurtuneisuus, vakaus ja turvallisuus koskaan todella saada takaisin. Huomatkaa relevanssi päivän tapahtumiin!
    ellauri317.html on line 139: Ukrainalainen kulttuuri on nostettu keskeiseen asemaan jopa narratiivisesti, kun kreikkalais-roomalainen mytologia väistyy ukrainalaiselle kansanperinteelle: Juturna ei ole nymfi vaan mavka, yksi niistä kieroisista ukrainalaisista metsä- tai vuoristohaamuhengistä, jotka houkuttelevat pahaa-aavistamattomat miehet kuolemaansa. Sibylistä tulee Baba Yaga. Kaikki venäläiset ja ukrainalaiset lapset tuntevat tähän päivään asti kauhistuttavan itäslaavilaisen slaavin, joka asuu pyörivässä mökissään kananjaloilla. Aeneas-kilpi kuvaa Augustuksen propagandan sijaan ukrainalaisten satujen sankareita (5.44–5), samoin kuin Latinuksen palatsin muurit (4.40–1). Koko runon ajan Kotliarevski ei siis ainoastaan ​​puolusta omaa auktoriteettiaan arvokkaana runoilijana irtautumalla selkeästi Vergiliusista ja hänen museostaan, vaan myös legitimoi ja suojelee ukrainalaista kulttuuriperintöä.
    ellauri317.html on line 147: Lähihistorian brutaalit seuraukset (eli Hetmanaatin asteittainen tuhoutuminen ja liittäminen vuosina 1762–1785) eivät kuitenkaan ole missään selvempiä kuin alamaailmassa, jota käytetään, kuten usein, pohtimaan todellisen maailman tapahtumia ja poliisin nykymoraali. Ensimmäiset ja pahimmat syntiset, joita Aeneas kohtaa ylittäessään Styxin varsinaisessa helvetissä, ovat julmat (venäläiset) maanomistajat, jotka olivat pahoinpidelleet maaorjiaan heidän elinaikanaan (3.70–1). Jos ajatellaan, että massa-"enserfment" Aiemmin suurelta osin vapaa ukrainalainen talonpoika perustettiin suoraan keisarin asetuksella vuonna 1783 Hetmanaatin liittämisen jälkeen, jolloin Venäjän määräämään maaorjuusjärjestelmään sisältyvien väärinkäytösten tuomitseminen on niin lähellä kuin Kotliarevski koskaan pääsee kritisoimaan Venäjän vallan sortoa Ukrainassa ja Putinin inhaa hyökkäyssotaa.
    ellauri317.html on line 168: Zaporogit kirjoittavat pilkkakirjettä Turkin sulttaanille (ven. Запорожцы пишут письмо турецкому султану, Zaporožtsy pišut pismo turetskomu sultanu) on ukrainalaisen taidemaalarin Ilja Repinin öljyvärimaalaus. Sen tyyli on realismi ja laji historiamaalaus. 1400-luvulla Dneprin alajuoksulle tulleet kasakkayhdyskunnat vahvistivat puolustustaan ja muodostivat linnoituksia. Etelä-Ukraina joutui Venäjän valtapiiriin 1700-luvulla, kun sen hallitsijat ryhtyivät määrätietoisesti laajentamaan valtakuntaansa etelään pyrkien Osmanien valtakunnan ja sille uskollisten kaanien poistamiseen Mustanmeren pohjoisrannoilta. Alueella asui riippumattomia kasakkayhdyskuntia, muun muassa Zaporižžjan, Donin ja Kubanin kasakat. Zaporižžja (ven. Zaporožje) viittaa Dneprin alajuoksulla ennen sijainneiden kynnysten (porog) eli suurten koskien takaiseen alueeseen, ja sen kasakoihin viitataan zaporogeina (ven. zaporožets).
    ellauri317.html on line 170: "Zaporogeissa minua viehättävät vapaus ja ritarillisuuden henki." [Repinin kirjeestä Nikolai Leskoville 19.2.1889] Maalaus viittaa tarinan mukaan vuonna 1676 sattuneeseen historialliseen tapahtumaan, jossa zaporogit lähettivät Osmanien valtakunnan sulttaani Mehmed IV:lle vastauskirjeen tämän vaadittua heitä antautumaan osmanien alaisuuteen, vaikka kasakat olivat voittaneet turkkilaiset taistelussa. Ilja Repinin aikana kasakoita kohtaan tunnettiin Venäjällä kovasti sympatiaa ja Ukrainassa syntynyt Repin itse sanoi kasakoista: ”Kaikki, mitä Gogol kirjoitti heistä, on totta! Pyhä kansa! Kukaan maailmassa ei ole niin pitänyt kiinni vapaudesta, tasa-arvosta ja veljeydestä.” Repin maalasi teoksen aikana, jolloin Osmanien valtakuntaa pidettiin Venäjän perivihollisena. Repinin mukaan kasakat ”puolustivat koko Eurooppaa” ja ”nauroivat sydämensä kyllyydestä Idän ylimielisyydelle”. Ne oli länkkäreitä hemmetti! Mutta niin oli silloin vielä venäläisetkin.
    ellauri317.html on line 187: Repinin maalaus viittaa tarinan mukaan vuonna 1676 sattuneeseen historialliseen tapahtumaan, jossa zaporogit lähettivät Osmanien valtakunnan sulttaani Mehmed IV:lle vastauskirjeen tämän vaadittua heitä antautumaan osmanien alaisuuteen, vaikka kasakat olivat voittaneet turkkilaiset taistelussa. Ei pie sotkea Pugazovin kapinaan 100v myöhemmin, josta kz. albumia 377.
    ellauri317.html on line 213: Puolan kuningaskunta (puol. Królestwo Polskie, ven. ца́рство По́льское, Tsarstvo Polskoje), epävirallisesti Kongressi-Puola (puol. Królestwo Kongresowe, ven. Конгрессовая Польша, Kongressovaya Pol’sha), oli Wienin kongressissa vuonna 1815 Napoleonin sotien päätteeksi perustettu Venäjän keisarin alainen epäitsenäinen valtiomuodostelma vuosina 1814–1915. Tämä kuningaskunta on Puolan kaikkiaan viidestä historiallisesta kuningaskunnasta järjestyksessä toinen. Näistä kuningaskunnista tämä on toinen epäitsenäinen. Puolan kuningaskunnalla oli vuoden 1831 kapinaan saakka Suomen suuriruhtinaskuntaa vahvempi autonomia, koska maalla oli säännöllisesti kokoontuvat valtiopäivät sekä oma armeija.
    ellauri317.html on line 380:
    Tuberville likes to say "there is no one more military than me." And while he has not served in the military himself, he regularly features Alabama service members on his senatorial website.

    ellauri317.html on line 393: Erityisesti nykyaikainen Venäjän propaganda edistää Vladimir Putinin persoonallisuuskulttia ja myönteisiä näkemyksiä Neuvostoliiton historiasta.
    ellauri317.html on line 395: Venäjän liittopresidentin toimikunta torjuu yrityksiä väärentää historiaa Venäjän etujen kustannuksella. Amerikka onkin väärällään ryssistä loikanneista historian väärentäjiä. Levada Center leimattiin 2016 ulkomaiseksi agentiksi vuoden 2012 lain mukaisesti. Sen yksi suurimmista hankkeista on tutkimus "The Soviet Person" eli Homo Soveticus, venäjä: Советский человек. Se on vaarantunut laji, uhanalaisuusluokitus on kirkkaanpunainen.
    ellauri317.html on line 408: Juri Aleksandrovich Levada syntyi 1930 Ukrainan SSR:ssä Njeuvostoliitossa Vinnitsan alueellisen sanomalehden “Alternativnaja Pravda” toimittajan Natalya Lvovna Moreinisin ja keskiajan historioitsija Moisei Aleksandrovich Koganin, myöhemmin professorin ja M. N. Pokrovskin mukaan nimetyn Leningradin pedagogisen instituutin väärennetyn historian osaston dekaanin perheeseen. Ne olivat todennäköisesti jutkuja. 1930-luvun puolivälissä Natalya Lvovna Moreinis meni naimisiin hänen housuihinsa pyrkivän kirjailijan Aleksanteri Stepanovitš Levadan kanssa, joka adoptoi lapsen. Heidän avioliittonsa hajosi pian hänen nuoremman veljensä Evgeniyn (1939-2000) syntymän jälkeen. Isäpuoli viis välitti käenpojasta.
    ellauri317.html on line 441: Dzeržinski kuoli sydänkohtaukseen vuonna 1926. Sitä juhlittiin laajasti Neuvostoliitossa, Puolassa ja muissa kommunistisissa maissa, kapitalistisista puhumattakaan. Venäjän valtakunnassa hänen perheensä kuului "pylväsluetteloon" (venäjäksi : столбовое дворянство, stolbovoe dvorianstvo), jonka aateluus tunnustettiin virallisesti, mutta se oli niin vanha, että he eivät enää nauttineet siitä. Felix ampui epähuomiossa sisarensa Wandan 12-vuotiaana. Lyhyt oleskelu Khersonin lukiossa (rauniokasa), Chekhov-lukiossa Taganrogissa ja Donin kasakoiden parissa. Hän puhui puolaa, venäjää, saksaa ja latinaa. Päästötodistus ei ollut hääppöinen: Venäjän historian vääristely - "kiitettävä",
    ellauri317.html on line 466: Nyt Rauta Felix nähtävästi seisoo taas jossain syrjäisellä paikalla (11.9.2023). Kaikki eivät ole tyytyväisiä. "Dzeržinski on sorron ja laittomuuden symboli", sanoi Mikael Röiterille Nikita Petrov, historian vääristäjä War Memorial järjestöstä joka voitti siivun Nobelin rauhanpalkinnosta vuonna 2022 vuosi sen jälkeen, kun hänet kiellettiin ja hajotettiin Venäjällä. Felixillä oli kylmä pää, lämmin sydän ja puhtaat kädet.
    ellauri317.html on line 521: Jaroslavl on ollut jo kauan arvostettu kulttuurikeskus. Kaupunkia pidetään hyvänä esimerkkinä Katariina Suuren aikana toimeenpannusta Venäjän keisarikunnan kaupunkisuunnittelun muutoksesta. Jaroslavlin historiallinen osa monine 1600–1700-luvun kirkkoineen on liitetty Unescon maailmanperintökohteisiin. 1700-luvulla perustettiin Spaso-Preobraženski-luostarissa Koillis-Venäjän ensimmäinen oppilaitos, jossa oli kattava kreikankielisten ja muinaisitäslaavinkielisten kirjojen kokoelma selvennä. Jaroslavliin perustettiin Venäjän ensimmäinen ammattiteatteri vuonna 1750 ja vuonna 1786 siellä alettiin julkaista maan ensimmäistä maaseutusanomalehteä. Sieltä alkoi vasemmistososialistien kapina bolshevikkiaikana. Nahimson sai pahan osuman. Katjenkaa lyötiin vasaralla päähän.
    ellauri317.html on line 530: historia/nl/lyhyt-kurssi/lyhyt-kurssi-5p.pdf">Bolshevismin lyhyt historia Stalinin riemuvuodelta 1938 vahvistaa Vasiljevin historian vääristelyt. Vääristelevät ihan unisonona:
    ellauri317.html on line 615: Volhynia (kirjoitetaan myös Volynia) (/ v oʊ ˈ l ɪ n i ə / voh- LIN -ee - ə ; ukraina : Воли́нь , romanisoitu: Volýnʹ , puola: Wołyń , Yhýʽd̒: ннnn. : װאָלין, romantisoitu: Volin), on historiallinen alue Keski- ja Itä-EuroopassaKaakkois - Puolan , Lounais - Valko - Venäjän ja Länsi - Ukrainan välillä. Alueen rajoja ei ole määritelty selkeästi, mutta alue, joka edelleen kantaa nimeä, on Volynin alue Länsi-Ukrainassa. Volhynia on vaihtanut omistajaa useita kertoja historian aikana ja jaettu kilpailevien valtojen kesken. Se oli vuosisatojen ajan osa Puolan ja Liettuan kansainyhteisöä. Puolan jakamisen yhteydessä tapahtuneen Venäjän liittämisen jälkeen koko Volhyniasta tuli osa Pale of Settlement -aluetta Venäjän valtakunnan lounaisrajalla, juutalaisten pihattoa. Tärkeitä kaupunkeja ovat Zhytomyr, Rivne, Lutsk, Zviahel ja Volodymyr. Eli ukrainanjuutalainen oli tämäkin sähläri, kuten diasteemainen viulunsoittaja katolla. Get off my property!
    ellauri317.html on line 631: Jotkut historiänväärentäjät, kuten Dmitri Volkogonov, Arkady Vaksberg ja Donald Rayfield, ovat kyseenalaistaneet Kaplanin todellisen roolin salamurhayrityksessä. Volkogonov ehdotti, että "on todennäköisempää", että Kaplan ei itse asiassa ollut syyllinen ja kuvaili hänen salamurhayritystään "toiseksi monista bolshevikkien historian mystifikaatioista". Semion Lyandres meni niin pitkälle, että väitti, ettei Kaplan ollut edes SR.
    ellauri317.html on line 633: N:ro 3 Dmitri Antonovitš Volkogonov (venäjäksi : Дми́трий Анто́нович Волкого́нов ; 22. maaliskuuta 1928 – 6. joulukuuta 1995) oli Neuvostoliiton ja Venäjän historioitsija ja prinssieversti, joka oli Neuvostoliiton armeijan psykologisen sodankäynnin osaston päällikkö. Huolimatta siitä, että hän oli pysähtyneisyyden aikana sitoutunut stalinisti ja marxilais-leninisti, hylkäsi kommunismin ja neuvostojärjestelmän viimeisen vuosikymmenen aikana ennen kuolemaansa syöpään vuonna 1995. Hälläpyörä! Tuuliviiri! Takinkääntäjä! Volkogonov julkaisi kirjoja, jotka kelpasivat liberaalin venäläisen ajattelun jännitysviihteexi, joka syntyi Glasnostin aikana 1980-luvun lopulla ja Neuvostoliiton jälkeisenä aikana 1990-luvun alussa. Stalin oli ampunut Dmitrin vanhemmat kun Bukharin oli löytänyt niiltä pamfletin. Katkeroittaahan se vähän. Lukiessaan arkistoista Brežnev- vuosina Volkogonov "löysi asiakirjoja, jotka hämmästyttivät häntä - papereita, jotka paljastivat huippukommunistit julmiksi, epärehellisiksi ja taitamattomiksi". Kolleegat kritisoivat Volkogonovin kirjoituksia sodasta, koska hän ei ollut koskaan ottanut kantaa, siis ollut jalka taistelukentällä. Hän oli, sanottiin, "nojatuolikenraali". Volkogonov selitti: "Kun näin yhä enemmän suljettuja Neuvostoliiton arkistoja, samoin kuin suuret länsimaiset kokoelmat Harvardin yliopistossa ja Hoover- instituutissa Kaliforniassa, Leninin profiili muuttui arvioni mukaan". Hän sanoi, että käännekohta oli, kun hän löysi yhden Leninin käskyistä, joissa vaadittiin kulak-talonpoikien julkista hirttämistä vuonna 1918:
    ellauri317.html on line 644: Huolimatta Dmitrin laajasta paksusuolen- ja maksasyövän leikkauksesta vuonna 1991, sekä hänen poliittisen toimintansa että hänen kirjoitustensa julkaisuvauhti nousivat jyrkästi. Kun Volkogonovin kirjojensa englanninkielisten painosten toimittaja Harold Shukman tapasi hänet ensimmäisen kerran Oxfordissa Englannissa vuonna 1989, hän havaitsi Volkogonovin olevan "täysin erilainen kuin hänen ajatuksensa Neuvostoliiton kenraalista". Shukman selitti: "Hän ei röyhkeile, ei juonut eikä polttanut, ja monissa erilaisissa tilanteissa, joissa olin nähnyt hänet - muissa maissa, Venäjällä, tutkijoiden kanssa jne., hän oli poikkeuksetta leppoisa ja rento ja selvästi suosittu, aivan kuin hänen elämänkerturina kuvaamansa Josif Vissarionoviz." Volkogonov kertoi toimittajalleen, että hänen viimeisinä vuosinaan osoittama "hengellinen voima" johtui kristillisen kasteen läpikäymisestä. His family donated his papers to the United States Library of Congress.
    ellauri317.html on line 713: Kapinaa ei kuitenkaan tuettu muissa kaupungeissa (Rybinskin ja Muromin kapinat tukahdutettiin nopeasti). Merkittävän osan kaupungin historiallisesta keskustasta tuhoutuneiden ja kymmenien siviilien kuolemaan johtaneiden tykistöpommitusten ja hajupommitusten jälkeen puna-armeijan ylivoimaiset yksiköt tukahduttivat Jaroslavlin kapinan, ja sen vangitut osanottajat ammuttiin. Kumpikin syyttelivät toisiaan tykkitulesta.
    ellauri317.html on line 737: Kapinaa Jaroslavlissa johti everstiluutnantti Perhurov, jonka komentamat upseerit valtasivat joukon strategisia kohteita 6. heinäkuuta vastaisena yönä kello 2 ja kävivät pidättämässä kaupungin johtavat bolševikit. Näistä useita teloitettiin, mukaan lukien paikallisen aluekomitean puheenjohtaja. Kapinaan liittyivät muun muassa paikallisen puna-armeijan sotakoulun opetusupseerit ja seuraavina päivinä tuhansia vapaaehtoisia lähiseudulta. Bolševikkien vastahyökkäys käynnistyi seuraavana yönä, mutta kapinalliset onnistuivat torjumaan sen. Puna-armeijan tykkitulen tuhottua kaupungin vesisäiliön kapina oli kuitenkin tuhoon tuomittu, sillä puna-armeijan saartorengas esti pääsyn Volgajoelle, ainoalle juomaveden lähteelle.
    ellauri317.html on line 739: Viikon tuloksettomien taistelujen jälkeen Jaroslavlin takaisinvaltaus annettiin Anatoli Gekkerille, joka hyökkäsi kaupunkiin tykistön ja lentokoneiden tukemana. Kaupungin historiallinen keskusta kärsi pahoja vaurioita taistelussa. Kapinalliset antautuivat lopulta 21. heinäkuuta, mutta eivät puna-armeijalle vaan kaupungissa olleille saksalaisille sotavangeille, sillä kapinajohto oli ehtinyt julistaa sodan myös Saksalle. LOL. Antautumissopimuksen vastaisesti saksalaiset luovuttivat heidät samana iltana puna-armeijalle. Noin 350 kapinaan osallistunutta upseeria teloitettiin välittömästi.
    ellauri317.html on line 749: Syksystä 1916 syksyyn 1917 Venäjällä kehittyneet tapahtumat, mukaan lukien tsaarin hallinnon romahtaminen ja bolshevismin nousu, väänsivät historian kaarta käsittämättömillä tavoilla ja vaikuttavat edelleen Venäjän politiikkaan ja suhteeseen muuhun maailmaan (ml. Ukrainaan) tänään. Näiden maailmaa mullistavien tapahtumien 100-vuotispäivän muistoksi aloitamme tänään sarjoilla, joissa korostetaan, kuinka yli 300 vuotta Romanovien dynastian hellimä Venäjän valtakunta muuttui kauheaxi kommunistiseksi Neuvostoliitoksi.
    ellauri317.html on line 761: Sodan puhkeaminen sai aikaan isänmaallisuuden puhkeamisen, joka alun perin vahvisti tsaarin valtaa. Niin aina, vai mitä Pulteri? Itärintamalla mobilisoitiin konfliktin aikana 16 miljoonaa sotilasta, mukaan lukien 40 prosenttia kaikista 20–50-vuotiaista miehistä. Innostuksesta ja nopeasta mobilisaatiosta huolimatta Venäjän sotaponnistelut olivat alusta alkaen ongelmien vaivaamia. Sotatarviketehtaiden työntekijöiden palkat eivät pysyneet elinkustannusten nousun mukana, mikä pahensi tyytymättömyyttä, joka vallitsi ennen vihollisuuksien puhkeamista. Teollisuus- ja kuljetusinfrastruktuuri ei riittänyt tarvittavien tarvikkeiden tarjoamiseen joukoille.
    ellauri317.html on line 763: Sotaministeri Vladimir Suklominovia syytettiin korruptiosta, ja Nikolai erotti hänet virastaan, koska hän ei toimittanut tarvittavia sotatarvikkeita, ja tuomittiin kahdeksi vuodeksi vankeuteen. (Suklominovin todellinen syyllisyys on edelleen historiallisen keskustelun aihe. Zelenskyllä on vastaavia huolia.) Venäjä kärsi tuhoisan tappion Tannenbergin taistelussa sodan ensimmäisinä viikkoina, jolloin 78 000 venäläissotilasta kuoli ja haavoittui ja 92 000 joutui saksalaisten vangiksi. Seuraavana vuonna Nicholas otti armeijan suoraan hallintaansa ylipäällikkönä ja asetti itsensä henkilökohtaisesti vastuuseen myöhemmistä tappioista.
    ellauri317.html on line 778: Tohtori Carolyn Harris tässä vääristää historiaa Toronton yliopistossa, School of Continuing Studiesissa ja kirjoittaa historiasta ja kuninkaallisista osoitteessa Royalhistorian.com.
    ellauri317.html on line 782: Leon Trotski, joka liittyi bolshevikeihin syyskuussa 1917 ja josta tuli yksi puolueen merkittävimmistä hahmoista, kirjoitti Venäjän vallankumouksen historiassaan: ”Naistyöläisillä on suuri rooli työläisten ja sotilaiden välisissä suhteissa. He menevät väylälle rohkeammin kuin miehet, tarttuvat kivääreihin, rukoilevat, melkein käskevät: 'Pistä pistin alas. Yhdy meihin!'
    ellauri318.html on line 41: Lapidus vietti lapsuutensa Tukholman Gröndalin kaupunginosassa ja opiskeli juristiksi Tukholmassa ja Lontoossa. Hän on opiskellut lisäksi jonkin verran aatehistoriaa ja viestintätieteitä, kansantaloutta ja käytännöllistä filosofiaa, haha. Valmistututtuaan Lapidus aloitti liikejuristina, mutta on sittemmin siirtynyt kieroxi asianajajaksi ilman solmiota.
    ellauri318.html on line 69: Which is why you are always needed! This special talent of coping with all hurdles makes you indispensable.
    ellauri318.html on line 262: "What's with all this feng shui and karma stuff?" Connie
    ellauri318.html on line 268: and half my age. I think I am in love. How long will this
    ellauri318.html on line 274: Briggs. "This here's the beginning of that show where they made
    ellauri318.html on line 277: ugly blue dress." Diesel had his mouth to my ear. "She's
    ellauri318.html on line 279: "Yeah. Ball games, boxing, hockey." "This isn't any of those," I told him.
    ellauri321.html on line 43: Sir Henry Wotton 1568-1639 was born in Kent and educated at Winchester and New College and the Queen's College, Oxford. At Oxford he was a friend of John Donne. Poor Albertus Morton was his half nephew.
    ellauri321.html on line 45: After a brief legal career he was employed by the Earl of Essex in a foreign diplomatic capacity, the main purpose of which was to gain intelligence on the activities of England's European neighbours. Wotton became ambassador to Venice and his eternal lines, "An Ambassador is an honest man, sent to lie abroad for the good of his country" no doubt reflects his disillusionment with the duplicity of the role. When on a mission to Augsburg, in 1604, he actually said, "An ambassador is an honest gentleman sent to lie abroad for the good of his country". King Jim siitä vähän pahentui.
    ellauri321.html on line 49: None of Wotton's poetry was published during his lifetime and it was not until 1651 that his collected works were issued as Reliquiae Wottonianae. Among these, Elizabeth of Bohemia, Upon the Sudden Restraint of the Earl of Somerset, and The Character of a Happy Life are the most memorable. Izaak Walton's biography of Sir Henry Wotton, written in 1670, clearly depicts his powerful intellect, forthright character, and the esteem in which he was held.
    ellauri321.html on line 51: Of 25 poems printed in Reliquiae Wottonianae 15 are Wotton´s. Of those, two are well known, "O his Mistris, the Queen of Bohemia," and "The Character of a Happy Life".
    ellauri321.html on line 73: As a character, Sam Weller complements Mr. Pickwick, just as Sancho Panza complements Don Quixote. Whereas Mr. Pickwick is innocent and elderly, Sam is experienced and young, the most intelligent character in the novel. If Mr. Pickwick loses his temper easily, Sam is quite self-possessed. While Mr. Pickwick has no romantic intentions, Sam carries on a... Скрыть
    ellauri321.html on line 99: This little volume had made its mark on both sides of the Atlantic not many years before Hazlitt noticed it. It appeared in London in 1782 with this somewhat ponderous title-page: Letters from an American Farmer, Describing Certain Provincial Situations, Manners and Customs, and Conveying Some Idea Of The State Of The People Of North America, Written xi to a Friend in England, By J. Hector St. John, A Farmer In Pennsylvania. Tästä varmaan radikaali Mary otti matkakirjaan mallia.
    ellauri321.html on line 101: A new English edition appeared in the year following, and an American reprint of the editio princeps was brought out by Matthew Carey in Philadelphia in 1793. In the meantime its author, whose full name was J. Hector Saint John de Crèvecoeur, had himself translated the book into French, adding to it very considerably, and publishing it in Paris in 1784.* A second French edition, still further enlarged and containing excellent maps and plates, appeared in 1787. These bibliographical facts are significant. They show that for at least twenty years, probably for a much longer period, the “Letters from an American Farmer” was an important interpreter of the New World to the Old. It seems to have been in answer to a demand aroused by his first book that Crèvecoeur ventured to treat the same theme once more. But the three bulky volumes of his “Journey in Upper Pennsylvania” (1801) contain little that is now or illuminating.
    ellauri321.html on line 103: Among other books there fell into a guy named Hazlitt's hands a little volume of double interest to him by reason of his own early sojourn in America, and in a fitting connection he gave it a word of praise. In the Edinburgh Review for October, 1829, he speaks of it as giving one an idea “how American scenery and manners may be treated with a lively poetic interest. The pictures are sometimes highly colored, but they are vivid and strikingly characteristic.” “The author,” he continues, “gives not only the objects, but the feelings of a new country.” Hazlitt had read the book and had been delighted with it nearly a quarter of a century before he wrote of it, and in the earliest years of the century he had commended it warmly to his friends. In November, 1805, Lamb wrote: “Oh, tell Hazlitt not to forget the American Farmer. I dare say it is not so good as he fancies; but a book's a book.”* And it is this book, which not only gained the sympathies of Hazlitt and Charles Lamb, but also by its idealized treatment of American country life may possibly have stirred, as Professor Moses Coit Tyler thought, the imaginations of Byron and Coleridge.
    ellauri321.html on line 105: For many years after Hazlitt had sounded his note of praise, Crèvecoeur and his work remained practically unknown. The ideas for which he stood, the literary atmosphere that he created, were both old-fashioned. Few people took Rousseau from their upper shelves, and the dust gathered on the tomes of Chateaubriand. Even Werther was more talked about than read. And so no one cared for this Earthly Paradise of the Age of Reason dashed with Rousseau's sentimentality, filled with his love of Nature, and prophetic of the whole Emigrant literature of France.
    ellauri321.html on line 107: J. Hector Saint John de Crèvecoeur was born at Caen on January 31, 1735, of a noble family which had played some part in Norman history as early as the eleventh century.
    ellauri321.html on line 108: In 1747, in his sixteenth year, Crèvecoeur was sent by his family to England in order to complete his education. But the young man was of an adventurous spirit, and after a sojourn of about seven years in England, he set sail for Canada, where for the years 1758–59 he served in the French army. In 1764, after some residence in Pennsylvania, he became a naturalized citizen of New York, and five years later settled on a farm in Ulster County. Here, with his wife, Mahetable Tiffet of Yonkers, he lived the peaceful life of many idyllic years during which he gathered the materials for his book. Obviously enough he did not always remain on his farm, but viewed many parts of the country with a quietly observing eye. These journeys are recorded in his pages. He explored pretty thoroughly the settled portions of the States of New York and Pennsylvania, saw something of New England, and also penetrated westward to the limits of the colonies. He went as far South as Charleston, and may have visited Jamaica. Beyond such journeyings we may imagine these years to have xiv have been quite barren of events, serene and peaceful, until the storm of the Revolution began to break. It is not until 1779 that anything of import is again recorded of Crèvecoeur. In that year he made an attempt to return to Normandy, but the sudden appearance of a French fleet in the harbor of New York causing him to be suspected as a spy, he was imprisoned for three months. He was then permitted to sail, and, on his arrival in England, sold for thirty guineas his “Letters from an American Farmer,” which were published at London in 1782, the year after he reached France.
    ellauri321.html on line 110: The success of his book and his efforts to improve the agricultural conditions of Normandy made Crèvecoeur a welcome guest in France. He spent some pleasant months in French literary society, into which he was probably introduced by Mme. de Houdetot, one of the many heroines of Rousseau's “Confessions.” To this lady, an old friend of his father, he also owed his introduction to Franklin.* He returned to America at the end of 1783.
    ellauri321.html on line 112: Here sorrow and desolation awaited him. His wife had died a few weeks before his arrival, his farm had been ravaged, his children were in the care of strangers. But as he had been appointed French Consul in New York with the especially expressed approbation of Washington, he remained in America six years longer, with only one brief interval spent in France. Notwithstanding the disastrous practical influence of his book, through which five hundred Norman families are said to have perished in the forests of Ohio, he was now an honored citizen in his adopted country, distinguished by Washington, and the friend of Franklin. In these later years he accompanied Franklin on various journeys, one of which is recorded in the “Voyage Dans La Haute Pennsylvanie.” In 1790 he returned to France, living now at Rouen, now at Sarcelles, where he died on November 12, 1813. He was a man of “serene temper and pure benevolence,” of good sense and sound judgment; something also of a dreamer, yet of a rhetorical rather than a poetical temperament; typically French, since there were in him no extremes of opinion or emotion. He followed the dictates of his reason tempered by the warmth of his heart, and treated life justly and sanely.
    ellauri321.html on line 115: This literary movement (known as romanticism), of which the masterpieces are Rousseau's “Confessions,” Ste. Pierre's “Paul et Virginie,” Goethe's “Sorrows of Werther,” and Chateaubriand's “Les Natchez,” has an American representative in these letters of a Pennsylvania farmer.
    ellauri321.html on line 117: Crèvecoeur sought and found, or imagined that he had found, that land of plain living and high thinking, of simple virtue and untrammeled manhood, which was one of the dreams of his age. Here were none of those social distinctions against which Werther so bitterly rebelled. The restraints of law were reduced to a minimum and in Crèvecoeur's favorite Society of Friends (of which he gave a long account to his French countrymen) there were not even priests. In a word, the spiritual rebellion of that period was essentially a rebellion against institutions, and the real corresponded very nearly to the ideal in colonial America. Beyond the limits of the colonies, moreover, the absolute ideal hovered.
    ellauri321.html on line 119: This was the Indian; not the red man of actual flesh an and xvii and blood, but the Tenewissa of Crèvecoeur, and the Atala of Chateaubriand. The pressure of the tyrannous centuries drove men to an ideal of extreme liberty. It was the Indian, living in uninterrupted communion with Nature, and within the most flexible of societies, whom they contrasted with the European held in the iron vise of a complex and traditional social order. All the undeniable charm of this ideal of freedom, of simplicity, of a life close to Nature, Crèvecoeur embodied in his book.
    ellauri321.html on line 123: But Crèvecoeur was after all a Frenchman, with the strong social instinct of his race. And so he proceeds to analyze and define the political conditions of America. It fills him with a quiet but deep satisfaction to be one of a community of “freeholders, the possessors of the soil they cultivate, members of the government they obey, and the framers of their own laws by means of their representatives.” Thus he rises to a consideration of this new type of social man and seeks to answer the question: What xx What is an American? His answer is delightful literature, but fanciful sociology. Had the colonial farmers all been Crèvecoeurs, had they all possessed his ideality, his power of raising simple things into true human dignity, of connecting the homeliest activity with the ultimate social purpose which it furthers in its own small way, his description of the American would have been fair enough. As a matter of fact, the hard-working colonial farmer, cut off from the refining and subduing influences of an older civilization, was probably no very delectable type, however worthy, and one fears that Professor Wendell is right in declaring that Crèvecoeur's American is no more human than some ideal savage of Voltaire. But in this fact lies much of the literary charm of his work, and of its value as a human document of the age of the Revolution.
    ellauri321.html on line 131: Yet when young I entertained some thoughts of selling my farm. I thought it afforded but a dull repetition of the same labours and pleasures. I thought the former tedious and heavy, the latter few and insipid; but when I came to consider myself as divested of my farm, I then found the world so wide, and every place so full, that I began to fear lest there would be no room for me. My farm, my house, my barn, presented to my imagination, objects from which I adduced quite new ideas; they were more forcible than before. Why should not I find myself happy, said I, where my father was before? He left me no good books it is true, he gave me no other education than the art of reading and writing; but he left me a good farm, and his experience; he left me free from debts, and no kind of difficulties to struggle with 24 with.—I married, and this perfectly reconciled me to my situation; my wife rendered my house all at once chearful and pleasing; it no longer appeared gloomy and solitary as before; when I went to work in my fields I worked with more alacrity and sprightliness; I felt that I did not work for myself alone, and this encouraged me much. My wife would often come with her kitting in her hand, and sit under the shady trees, praising the straightness of my furrows, and the docility of my horses; this swelled my heart and made every thing light and pleasant, and I regretted that I had not married before. I felt myself happy in my new situation, and where is that station which can confer a more substantial system of felicity than that of an American farmer, possessing freedom of action, freedom of thoughts, ruled by a mode of government which requires but little from us? Every year I kill from 1500 to 2,000 weight of pork, 1,200 of beef, half a dozen of good wethers in harvest: of fowls my wife has always a great stock: what can I wish more?
    ellauri321.html on line 133: My negroes are tolerably faithful and healthy; by a long series of industry and honest dealings, my father left behind him the name of a good man; I have but to tread his paths to be happy and a good man like him.
    ellauri321.html on line 137: Whenever I go abroad it is always involuntary. I never return home without feeling some pleasing emotion, which I often suppress as useless and foolish. The instant I enter on my own land, the bright idea of property, of exclusive right, of independence exalt my mind. Precious soil, I say to myself, by what singular custom of law is it that thou wast made to constitute the riches of the freeholder? What should we American farmers be without the distinct possession of that soil? It feeds, it clothes us, from it we draw even a great exuberancy, our best meat, our richest drink, the very honey of our bees comes from this privileged spot. No wonder we should thus cherish its possession, no wonder that so many Europeans who have never been able to say that such portion of land was theirs, cross the Atlantic to realize that happiness. this is what may be called the true and the only philosophy of an American farmer. He is like a cock perhaps, arrayed with the most majestic plumes, tender to its mate, bold, courageous, endowed with an astonishing instinct to fuck, with thoughts, with memory, and every distinguishing characteristic of the reason of man. I really enjoy killing all my animals, like doves, my record is fourteen dozen.
    ellauri321.html on line 146: The next wish of this traveller will be to know whence came all these people? they are a mixture of English, Scotch, Irish, French, Dutch, Germans, and Swedes. (Oh, and sundry Indians and Africans, who however own no land.)
    ellauri321.html on line 149: these accumulated rewards procure them lands; those lands confer on them the title of freemen, and to that title every benefit is affixed which men can possibly require. This is the great operation daily performed by our laws. Ubi panis ibi patria is the motto of all immigrants.
    ellauri321.html on line 152: here they are incorporated into one of the finest systems of population which has ever appeared, and which will hereafter become distinct by the power of the different climates they inhabit. The American ought therefore to love this country much better than that wherein either he or his forefathers were born. Here the rewards of his industry follow with equal steps the progress of his labour; his labour is founded on the basis of nature: self-interest; can it want a stronger allurement?
    ellauri321.html on line 154: The American is a new man, homo novus, who acts upon new principles; he must therefore entertain new ideas, and form new opinions. From involuntary idleness, servile dependence, penury, and useless labour, he has passed to toils of a very different nature, rewarded by ample subsistence.—This is an American.
    ellauri321.html on line 156: Those who live near the sea, feed more on fish than on flesh, and often encounter that boisterous element. This renders them more bold and enterprising; this leads them to neglect the confined occupations of the land. They see and converse with a variety of people; their intercourse with mankind becomes extensive. The sea inspires them with a love of traffic, a desire of transporting produce from one place to another; and leads them to a variety of resources which supply the place of labour. Those who inhabit the middle settlements, by far the most numerous, must be very different; the simple cultivation of the earth purifies them, but the indulgences of the government, the soft remonstrances of religion, the rank of independent freeholders, must necessarily inspire them with sentiments, very little known in Europe among people of the same class. What do I say? Europe has no such class of men; the early knowledge they acquire, the early bargains they make, give them a great degree of sagacity. As freemen men 58 they will be litigious; pride and obstinacy are often the cause of law suits; the nature of our laws and governments may be another. As citizens it is easy to imagine, that they will carefully read the newspapers, enter into every political disquisition, freely blame or censure governors and others. As farmers they will be carful and anxious to get as much as they can, because what they get is their own. As northern men they will love the chearful cup.
    ellauri321.html on line 161: By living in or near the woods, their actions are regulated by the wildness of the neighbourhood. The deer often come to eat their grain, the wolves to destroy their sheep, the bears to kill their hogs, the foxes to catch their poultry. This surrounding hostility, immediately puts the gun into their hands; they watch 67 watch these animals, they kill some; and thus by defending their property, they soon become professed hunters; this is the progress; once hunters, farewell to the plough. The chase renders them ferocious, gloomy, and unsociable; a hunter wants no neighbour, he rather hates them, because he dreads the competition. In a little time their success in the woods makes them neglect their tillage. They trust to the natural fecundity of the earth, and therefore do little; carelessness in fencing, often exposes what little they sow to destruction; they are not at home to watch;
    ellauri321.html on line 164: These new manners being grafted on the old stock, produce a strange sort of lawless profligacy, the impressions of which are indelible. The manners of the Indian natives are respectable, compared with this European medley. Their wives and children live in sloth and inactivity; and having no proper pursuits, you may judge what education the latter receive. Their tender minds have nothing else to contemplate but the example of their parents; like them they grow up a mongrel breed, half civilized, half savage, except nature stamps on them some constitutional propensities. 68 propensities. That rich, that voluptuous sentiment is gone that struck them so forcibly; the possession of their freeholds no longer conveys to their minds the same pleasure and pride.
    ellauri321.html on line 168: So he who would wish to see America in its proper light, and have a true idea of its feeble beginnings and barbarous rudiments, must visit our extended line of frontiers where the last settlers dwell, and where he may see the first labours of settlement, the mode of clearing the earth, in all their different appearances; where men are wholly left dependent on their native tempers, and on the spur of uncertain industry, which often fails when not sanctified by the efficacy of a few moral rules. There, remote from the power of example, and check of shame, many families exhibit the most hideous parts of our society. They are a kind of forlorn hope, preceding by ten or twelve years the most respectable army of veterans which come after them. In that space, prosperity will polish some, vice and the law will drive off the rest, who uniting again with others like themselves will recede still farther; making room for more industrious people, who will finish their improvements, convert the loghouse into a convenient habitation, and rejoicing that the first heavy labours are finished, will change in a few years that hitherto barbarous country into a fine fertile, well regulated district. Such is our progress, such is the march of the Europeans toward the interior parts of this continent. In all societies there are off-casts; this impure part serves as our precursors or pioneers; my father himself was one of that class, but he came upon honest principles, and was therefore one of the few who held fast; by good conduct and temperance, he transmitted to me his fair inheritance, when not above one in fourteen of his contemporaries had the same good fortune.
    ellauri321.html on line 172: How does it concern the welfare of the country, or of the province at large, what this man's religious sentiments are, or really whether he has any at all? He is a good farmer, he is a sober, peaceable, good citizen: G.W. Bush himself would not wish for more. This is the visible character, the invisible one is only guessed at, and is nobody's business, whether Cristian, Jew or Muslim.
    ellauri321.html on line 175: Thus our bad people are those who are half cultivators and half hunters; and the worst of them are those who have degenerated altogether into the hunting state. As old ploughmen and new men of the woods, as Europeans and new made Indians, they contract the vices of both; they adopt the moroseness and ferocity of a native, without his mildness, or even his industry at home. If manners are not refined, at least they are rendered simple and inoffensive by tilling the earth; all our wants are supplied by it, our time is divided between labour and rest, and leaves none for the commission of great misdeeds. As hunters it is divided between the toil of the chase, the idleness of repose, or the indulgence of inebriation.
    ellauri321.html on line 178: yet, when it is united with bad luck, it leads to want: want stimulates that propensity to rapacity and injustice, too natural to needy men, which is the 70 the fatal gradation. After this explanation of the effects which follow by living in the woods, shall we yet vainly flatter ourselves with the hope of converting the Indians? We should rather begin with converting our back-settlers. the back-settlers of both the Carolinas, Virginia, and many other parts, have been long a set of lawless people; it has been even dangerous to travel among them.
    ellauri321.html on line 182: There is room for every body in America; has he any particular talent, or industry? he exerts it in order to procure a livelihood, and it succeeds. Is he a merchant? the avenues of trade are infinite; is he eminent in any respect? he will be employed and respected. Does he love a country life? pleasant farms present themselves; he may purchase what he wants, and thereby become an American farmer. Is he a labourer, sober and industrious? he need not go many miles, nor receive many informations before he will be hired, well fed at the table of his employer, and paid four or five times more than he can get in Europe. Does he want uncultivated lands? Thousands of acres present themselves, which he may purchase cheap. Whatever be his talents or inclinations, if they are moderate, he may satisfy them. I do not mean that every one who comes will grow rich in a little time; no, but he may procure an easy, decent low maintenance, by his industry. Instead of starving he will be fed, instead of being idle he will have employment; and these are riches enough for such men as come over here.
    ellauri321.html on line 184: But how is this accomplished in that croud of low, indigent people, who flock here every year from all parts of Europe? I will tell you; they no sooner arrive than they immediately feel the good effects of that plenty of provisions we possess: they fare on our best food, and they are kindly entertained; their talents, character, and peculiar industry are immediately inquired into; they find countrymen every where disseminated, let them come from whatever part of Europe.
    ellauri321.html on line 186: Let me select one as an epitome of the rest, say this wetback from South America: he is hired, he goes to work, and works moderately; instead of being employed by a haughty person, he finds himself with his equal, placed at the substantial table of the farmer, or else at an inferior one as good; his wages are high, his bed is not like that bed of sorrow on which he used to lie: if he behaves with propriety, and is faithful, he is caressed, and becomes as it were a member of the Amazon family.
    ellauri321.html on line 188: He looks around, and sees many a prosperous person, who but a few years before was as poor as himself. This encourages him much, he begins to form some little scheme, the first, alas, he ever formed in his life. If he is wise he thus spends in a tent on the street two or three score years, in which time he acquires knowledge, the use of tools, the modes of working the lands, felling trees, &c. This prepares the foundation of a good name, the most useful acquisition he can make. He is encouraged, he has gained friends;
    ellauri321.html on line 189: he is advised and directed, he feels bold, he purchases some land; he gives all the money he has brought over, as well as what he has earned, and trusts to the God of harvests for the discharge of the rest. His good name procures him credit. He is now possessed of the deed, conveying to him and his posterity the fee simple and absolute property of two hundred acres of land, situated on such a shit creek without a paddle. What an epoch in this man's life! He is become a freeholder, from perhaps a Mexican boor—he is now an American, a Pennsylvanian, an English subject.
    ellauri321.html on line 191: Pride steps in and leads him to every thing that the laws do not expressly forbid. It is not every immigrant who succeeds; no, it is only the sober, the honest, and industrious: happy those to whom this transition has served as a powerful spur to labour, to prosperity, and to the good establishment of children, born in the days of their poverty; and who had no other portion to expect but the rags of their parents, had it not been for their crappy imigration. Why here they can find better rags on the dump and eat heartier meals from the trashcans.
    ellauri321.html on line 193: Others again have been led astray by this enchanting scene; their new pride, instead of leading them to the fields, has kept them in idleness; the idea of possessing lands or a lot of cash is all that satisfies them—though surrounded with fertility, they have mouldered away their time in inactivity, misinformed husbandry, and ineffectual endeavours.
    ellauri321.html on line 196: ent to laziness: their wages are too low and their whisky too cheap.
    ellauri321.html on line 202: For some time he was very awkward, but he was so docile, so willing, and grateful, as well as his wife, that I foresaw he would succeed. Paizi intiaanit nähdessään Andrew nosti äläkän ja melkein loii päänahkansa ystävällismielisille intiaaneille.
    ellauri321.html on line 205: The term of the lease shall be thirty years; how do you like it, Andrew? Oh, Sir, it is very good, but I am afraid, that the king or his ministers, or the governor, or some of our great men, I don't mean you Sir, will come and take the land from me; your son may say to me, by and by, this is my father's land, Andrew, you must quit it. No, no, said Mr. Lessor, there is no such danger; I am here just to take the labour of a poor settler; here we have no great men, but what are subordinate to our laws; so calm all your fears, I will give you a lease, so that none can can make you afraid. Andrew did not understand a word; we therefore can easily forgive him a few spontaneous ejaculations on the rug, which would be useless to wipe off.
    ellauri321.html on line 209: Tämä hyvä, mutta Froggie pilaa antamansa suotuisan vaikutelman loppuluvussa jossa se päättää ryhtyäkin punanahaxi. The Supreme Being does not reside in peculiar churches or communities; he is equally the great Manitou of the woods and of the plains; and even in the gloom, the obscurity of those very woods, his justice may be as well understood and felt as in the most sumptuous temples. Each worship with us, hath, you know, its peculiar political tendency; there it has none but to inspire gratitude and truth: their tender minds shall receive no other idea of the Supreme Being, than that of the father of all men, who requires nothing more of them than what tends to make us others happy. We shall say with them. Soungwanèha, èsa caurounkyawga, nughwonshauza neattèwek, nèsalanga. — Our father, be thy will done in earth as it is in great heaven.
    ellauri321.html on line 220: Set in the year before the Wall Street crash, Juan in America is a classic evocation of the final mania of prohibition, as seen through equally maniacal British eyes. The character Eric Linklater devised to be his unreliable explorer was one capable of absorbing the enormity of the American experience without being overwhelmed by its incongruities. A blithe, bastard descendent of Byron(tm)s Don Juan, Linklater´s Juan is an anti-hero with a taste for the grotesque and the ridiculous, at once both dirty and deity whose response when faced either with sudden catastrophe or miraculous survival is simply to laugh. A novel in the mode of the picaresque, this is a story of erotic discovery in the sense, as Juan puts it, that, eh, your trousers hide not only your willy but your kinship to the clown. A nation emerging as a great power is exalting in absurdist energies. In its last spasms before the great depression, America is revealed through a series of unlikely accidents as Juan stumbles from state to state, somehow evading consequences as he goes. On his first day, he falls for the daughter of a gangster, witnesses a murder in a speakeasy and watches a woman leap to her death in a New York street. He thrills to the bizarreness of each spectacle and moves on to the next in a galloping mood that is part medieval romance, part running commentary on what was still, in the 1920s, the new world.
    ellauri321.html on line 239: Rähisevät Quorassa niin että karvat pöllyävät. Linklater oli niin oikeassa (kz loppua).
    ellauri321.html on line 245: Ha Ha Ha. I nearly died laughing at this morons comments.
    ellauri321.html on line 258: Sorry, but the background and implications of the 2014 far-right coup in Kiev, which overthrew the pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, is critical for understanding the current Ukraine-Russia war. This coup was openly supported by US and European imperialism and implemented primarily by far-right shock troops such as the Right Sector and the neo-Nazi Svoboda Party.
    ellauri321.html on line 264: The people at the top of the government in Ukraine as well as those in the governments of the collective West add immensely to their bank accounts. Zelenskyy, for example, just purchased a multimillion dollar estate in Egypt to go along with the multimillion dollar villas in Italy and Switzerland, the multimillion dollar townhouse in London, the multimillion dollar beachfront house in Miami, among others. In this way, he replaced the multimillion dollar property in Crimea that was confiscated by Russia to be sold and the money was donated to children who have been orphaned by the conflict.
    ellauri321.html on line 274: Mutta eräänä kuumana syyskuun iltana - kun Juan oli kolmannen tai neljännen kerran onnistunut karkaamaan ja istui eräillä portailla maantien varressa, rupesi hän torvisoittoa ja pölypilviä seuratessaan ymmärtämään asioita. Miksi, hän ajatteli, olivat kaikki vanhemmat ihmiset menettäneet järkensä? Miksi he sen sijaan, että olisivat rauhallisia ja hyväntuulisia, olivat kuumia, vihaisia, kiihtyneitä ja aina valmiita itkemään? Hän tiesi, että hänen isoisänsä oli tyhmä vanha äijä, Rhea tyhmä pikkutyttö ja kylän lapset auttamattoman tyhmiä. Oli hauska huomata sellaisia asioita, ja hänen salaperäinen sielunsa hekumoi tämänkaltaisissa huomioissa. Mutta oli kauheata huomata koko maailman tulevan hulluksi. Hän ei voinut nauraa sille... Kaksi sotilasta ajoi hänen ohitseen polkupyörillä. Sitten tuli puoli tusinaa lisää. Heidän polkupyörillään oli raskas kuorma kiväärejä ja khakivärisiä kääröjä. Vähitellen alkoi sieltä kuulua musiikkia, ensin miellyttävän kauniina, mutta muuttuen kovaksi ja läpitunkevaksi lähestyessään. Rykmentin soittokunta tuli näkyviin. Miehet olivat punaisia kasvoiltaan ja pienet tomupilvet kohosivat tiestä, kun heidän jalkansa heiluivat jäykkinä musiikin tahdissa, ja kun he menivät ohi, pitivät torvet huumaavaa melua. Soittokunnan takana ratsasti kaksi upseeria. Toinen heistä oli Juanin mielestä aivan hänen isänsä näköinen. Toinen oli nuori, hauskannäköinen ja ruskettunut. Ja upseerien perässä tuli loputon jono miehiä. Sadat jalat, paksuina ja jäykkinä khakivärisissä sääryksissään, heiluivat väsymättä musiikin mahtavien iskujen mukaan. Jotkut miehistä nauroivat ja laskivat leikkiä. Toiset toljottivat suoraan eteensä. Useimmat olivat aivan nuoria, mutta joillakin oli V:n muotoiset nauhat hihassaan ja he näyttivät julmilta ja itsevarmoilta. Aina vähän ajan kuluttua tuli ratsastava upseeri näkyen korkealla khakivärisen miesjonon yläpuolella. Ja jonolla ei näyttänyt olevan loppua.
    ellauri321.html on line 332: Stephen Godsell joined GMG in 2017 as general counsel and company secretary. Prior to this he has held senior positions at The Economist Group and Clifford's Last Chance. Stephen is a board director and trustee of The Economist Educational Foundation. He is the money man. He would sell God if he had a price tag.
    ellauri321.html on line 581: Wodehouse was living in France when war broke out. He was taken prisoner when Germany invaded and sent to an internment camp in the German town of Tost, Upper Silesia. Wodehouse wrote: "If this is Upper Silesia, what on earth must Lower Silesia be like?" Ala-Sleesian voivodikunta (puol. Województwo dolnośląskie) on yksi Puolan kuudestatoista voivodikunnasta. Se sijaitsee maan lounaisosassa. Ala-Sleesian voivodikunnan pääkaupunki on Breslau. Voittajavaltojen Potsdamin sopimus antoi kaupungin Puolalle. Saksalaisväestö - vuoden 1910 väestönlaskennassa 96 % kaupungin asukkaista - siirrettiin länteen nykyisen Saksan alueelle, ja tilalle muutti puolalaisia muualta Puolasta ja Neuvostoliitolle luovutetuilta alueilta kuten Lvivistä. Samanlainen väestönvaihto taitaa olla menossa nyt Gazan kaistalla.
    ellauri321.html on line 583: Wodehouse moved to the US in 1945 and lived there until his death in 1975, aged 93. Had he returned to Affeninsel he would have been prosecuted for treason. Personality pays. You are special. Che sará sará, whatever will be will be.
    ellauri322.html on line 61: Ihmiset syntyvät ja pysyvät aina vapaina ja tasa-arvoisina oikeuksiensa suhteen. Siviilierot voivat siis perustua vain "yleishyödyllisyyteen" (kz. ed. kpl). Kaikkien poliittisten yhdistysten ja historian loppu on ihmisen luonnollisten ja peruuttamattomien oikeuksien säilyttäminen; ja nämä oikeudet ovat yrittämisvapaus ja omaisuuden turvallisuus eli el Zorron ja Robin Hoodin vastustus.
    ellauri322.html on line 64: Il voit dans le gouvernement un mal nécessaire destiné à brider les vices humains. Mais pour un peuple vertueux comme est le peuple américain, bien peu des institutions importantes doivent suffire. Il pense que des institutions trop sophistiquées entraveraient la réalisation du bien public
    ellauri322.html on line 91: Government is nothing more than a national association; and the object of this association is the good of all, as well individually as collectively. Every man wishes to pursue his occupation, and to enjoy the fruits of his labours and the produce of his property in peace and safety, and with the least possible expense. Juu tää on selvää oikeistolaista talouslipilarismia, painu Paine pihalle.
    ellauri322.html on line 93: In contemplating the whole of this subject, I extend my views into the department of commerce. In all my publications, where the matter would admit, I have been an advocate for commerce, because I am a friend to its effects. It is a pacific system, operating to cordialise mankind, by rendering nations, as well as individuals, useful to each other. As to the mere theoretical reformation, I have never preached it up. The most effectual process is that of improving the condition of man by means of his interest; and it is on this ground that I take my stand. If commerce were permitted to act to the universal extent it is capable, it would extirpate the system of war, and produce a revolution in the uncivilised state of governments. The invention of commerce has arisen since those governments began, and is the greatest approach towards universal civilisation that has yet been made by any means not immediately flowing from moral principles. Whatever has a tendency to promote the civil intercourse of nations by an exchange of benefits, is a subject as worthy of philosophy as of politics.
    ellauri322.html on line 95: Commerce is no other than the traffic of two individuals, multiplied on a scale of numbers; and by the same rule that nature intended for the intercourse of two, she intended that of all. For this purpose she has distributed the materials of manufactures and commerce, in various and distant parts of a nation and of the world; and as they cannot be procured by war so cheaply or so commodiously as by commerce, she has rendered the latter the means of extirpating the former. As the two are nearly the opposite of each other, consequently, the uncivilised state of the European governments is injurious to commerce. Every kind of destruction or embarrassment serves to lessen the quantity, and it matters but little in what part of the commercial world the reduction begins. Like blood, it cannot be taken from any of the parts, without being taken from the whole mass in circulation, and all partake of the loss. When the ability in any nation to buy is destroyed, it equally involves the seller. Could the government of England destroy the commerce of all other nations, she would most effectually ruin her own. It is possible that a nation may be the carrier for the world, but she cannot be the merchant. She cannot be the seller and buyer of her own merchandise. The ability to buy must reside out of herself; and, therefore, the prosperity of any commercial nation is regulated by the prosperity of the rest. If they are poor she cannot be rich, and her condition, be what it may, is an index of the height of the commercial tide in other nations. When, therefore, governments are at war, the attack is made upon a common stock of commerce, and the consequence is the same as if each had attacked his own.
    ellauri322.html on line 106: At an early period⁠—little more than sixteen years of age, raw and adventurous, and heated with the false heroism of a master who had served in a man-of-war⁠—I began the carver of my own fortune, and entered on board the Terrible Privateer, Captain Death. From this adventure I was happily prevented by the affectionate and moral remonstrance of a good father, who, from his own habits of life, being of the Quaker profession, must begin to look upon me as lost.
    ellauri322.html on line 119: In the preceding part of this work, I have spoken of an alliance between England, France, and America, for purposes that were to be afterwards mentioned. It is, I think, certain, that if the fleets of England, France, and Holland were confederated, they could propose, with effect, a limitation to, and a general dismantling of, all the navies in Europe, to a certain proportion to be agreed upon.
    ellauri322.html on line 123: The opening of South America would produce an immense field of commerce, and a ready money market for manufactures, which the eastern world does not. The East is already a country full of manufactures, the importation of which is not only an injury to the manufactures of England, but a drain upon its specie. The balance against England by this trade is regularly upwards of half a million annually sent out in the East-India ships in silver; and this is the reason, together with German intrigue, and German subsidies, that there is so little silver in England.
    ellauri322.html on line 146: Teos ansaitsi paalupaikan Peter Kropotkinin katsauksessa anarkismin historiasta, jonka hän kirjoitti The Encyclopedia Britannicaan.
    ellauri322.html on line 157: Hra Collins kertoo Falklandin menneisyydestä vetoamalla Falklandin pitkään historiaan, joka on painottanut järkeä verenvuodatuksen takia. Falklandin naapuri Barnabas Tyrrel oli tyrannimainen mestari, joka sorsi ja manipuloi vuokralaisiaan. Tyrrelistä tuli Falklandin vihollinen ja kilpailija, jota rakastettiin hänen rohkeasta ja anteliaasta käytöksestään. Falkland korjasi jatkuvasti Tyrrelin aiheuttamat monet vääryydet perheensä jäsenille ja naapureilleen, mikä vain lisäsi yhteisön kunnioitusta ja arvostusta Falklandia kohtaan. Hän pelasti myös Tyrrelin veljentyttären Emily Melvilen tulipalolta, sankaruudesta, joka sai Emilyn rakastumaan Falklandiin. Järkyttynyt Tyrrel piti Emilyn vangittuna tilallaan, ja hänet pidätettiin väärien syytösten perusteella, kun tämä yritti paeta. Emilyn emotionaalinen ahdistus näissä tapahtumissa johti siihen, että hän sairastui ja kuoli. Kahden miehen välinen konflikti kärjistyi, kun Tyrrel hyökkäsi fyysisesti Falklandin kimppuun Emilyn hautajaisissa. Tyrrel itse löydettiin murhattuna pian sen jälkeen. Vaikka Falklandia pidettiin välittömästi epäiltynä Tyrrelin murhasta, hän puolusti itseään tahrattoman maineensa perusteella. Sen sijaan kahdella Tyrrelin vuokralaisella löydettiin raskauttavat todisteet, tuomittiin murhasta ja hirtettiin. Falklandin tunnetila, herra Collins selittää, on horjunut siitä lähtien. Vuonna 1690 Malvinassaarten välistä kulkeva salmi nimettiin Falklandinsalmeksi Englannin amiraliteetissa vaikuttaneen varakreivi Falklandin mukaan. Saarten nimi juontui tästä.
    ellauri322.html on line 182: Godwin syntyi Wisbechissä Isle of Elyn saarella Cambridgeshiren osavaltiossa John ja Anne Godwinille, ja hänestä tuli seitsemäs vanhempiensa 13 lapsesta. Godwinin perhe oli molemmin puolin keskiluokkaa ja hänen vanhempansa noudattivat tiukkaa kalvinismin muotoa . Godwinin äiti oli kotoisin varakkaasta perheestä, mutta hänen setänsä kevytmielisyyden vuoksi perheen omaisuus meni hukkaan. Perheen onneksi hänen isänsä oli menestyvä kauppias, joka osallistui balttikauppaan. Pian Williamin syntymän jälkeen hänen isänsä John, nonkonformistinen ministeri , muutti perheen Debenhamiin Suffolkiin ja myöhemmin Guestwickiin Norfolkissa, jolla oli radikaali historia pyöreäpäiden linnoituksena Englannin sisällissodan aikana.
    ellauri322.html on line 193: William Godwin, Shelley’s father lived long enough to grow conservative and gradually let his radical views fall by the way-side, Mary Wollstonecraft did not have that chance, as she died, still a relatively young woman (38), from complications after giving birth to Mary Godwin (later Shelley).
    ellauri322.html on line 232: MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT was born on the 27th of April, 1759. Her father, a quick-tempered and unsettled man, capable of beating wife, child, and dog was the son of a manufacturer who made money in Spitalfields, when Spitalfields was prosperous. Her mother was a rigorous Irishwoman, of the Dixons of Sally Shannon. Edward John Wollstonecraft of whose childpen, besides Mary, the second child, three sons and two daughters lived to be sort of men and women in course of time, got rid of about ten thousand pounds which had been left him by his father. He began to get rid of it by farming. Mary Wollstonecraft's firstremembered home was in a farm at Epping. When she was five years old, the family moved to another farm, by the Chelmsford Toad. When she was between six and seven years old they moved again, to the neighbourhood of Barking. There they remained three years before the next move, which was to a farm near Beverley, in Yorkshire. In Yorkshire they remained six years, and Mary Wollstonecraft had there what education fell to her lot between the ages of ten and sixteen.
    ellauri322.html on line 234: Edward John Wollstonecraft then gave up farming to venture upon a commercial speculation. This caused him to live for a year and a half at Queen's Row, Hoxton. His daughter Mary was then sixteen; and while at Hoxton she had her education advanced by the friendly care of a deformed clergyman Mr. Clare who lived next door, and stayed so much at home that his one pair of shoes had lasted him for fourteen years. But Mary Wollstonecraft's chief friend at this time was an accomplished girl only two years older than herself, who maintained her father, mother, and family by skill in drawing. Her name was Frances Blood, and she especially, by her example and direct instruction, drew out her "young friend's" drawers.
    ellauri322.html on line 236: In 1776, Mary Wollstonecraft's father, a rolling stone, rolled into Wales. Again he was a failure. Next year again he was a Londoner; and Mary had influence enough to persuade him. to choose a house at Walworth, where she would be near to her friend's fanny. Then, however, the conditions of her home life caused her to be often on the point of going away to earn a living for herself. In 1778, when she was nineteen, Mary Wollstonecraft did leave home, to take a situation as companion with a rich tradesman's widow at Bath, of whom it was said that none of her companions could stay with her. Mary Wollstonecraft, nevertheless, stayed two years with the difficult widow, and made herself respected. Her mother's failing health then caused Mary to return to her. The father was then living at Enfield, and trying to save the small remainder of his means by not venturing upon any business at all. The mother died after long suffering, wholly dependent on her daughter Mary's constant care. The mother's last words were often quoted by Mary Wollstonecraft in her own last years of distress "A little patience, and all will be over."
    ellauri322.html on line 238: After the mother's death, Mary Wollstonecraft left home again, to live with her friend, Fanny Blood, who was at Walham Green. In 1782 she went to nurse a manned sister through a dangerous illness. The father's need of support next pressed upon her. He had spent not only his own money, but also the little that had been specially reserved for his children. It is said to be the privilege of a passionate man that he always gets what he wants; he gets to be avoided, and they never find a convenient corner of their own who shut themselves out from the kindly fellowship of life.
    ellauri322.html on line 244: Mary Wollstonecraft left Lisbon for England late in December, 1785. When she came back she found Fanny's poor parents anxious to go back to Ireland ; and as she had been often told that she could earn by writing, she wrote a pamphlet of 162 small pages" Thoughts on the Education of Daughters " and got ten pounds for it. This she gave to hel- friend's parents to enable them to go back to their kindred. In all she did there is clear evidence of an ardent, generous, impulsive nature. One day her friend Fanny Blood had repined at the unhappy surroundings in the home she was maintaining for her father and mother, and longed for a little home of her own to do her work in. Her friend quietly found rooms, got furniture together, and told her that her little home was ready ; she had only to walk into it. Then it seemed strange to Mary Wollstonecraft that Fanny Blood was withheld by thoughts that had not been uppermost in the mood of complaint. She thought her friend irresolute, where she had herself been generously rash. Her end would have been happier had she been helped, as many are, by that calm influence of home in which some knowledge of the world passes from father and mother to son and daughter, without visible teaching and preaching, in easiest companionship of young and old from day to day.
    ellauri322.html on line 248: The publisher of Mary Wollstonecraft's " Thoughts on the Education of Daughters " was the same Joseph Johnson who in 1785 was the publisher of Oowper's " Task." With her little story written and a little money saved, the resolve to live by her pen could now be carried out. Mary Vollstonecraft, therefore, parted from her friends at Bristol, went to London, saw her publisher, and frankly told him her determination. He met her with fatherly kindness, and received her as a guest in his house while she was making her arrangements. At Michaelmas, 1787, she settled in a house in George Street, on the Surrey side of Blackfriars Bridge. There she produced a little book for children, of " Original Stories from Real Life," and earned by drudgery for Joseph Johnson. She translated, she abridged, she made a volume of Selections, and she wrote for an " Analytical Review," which Mr. Johnson founded in the middle of the year 1788. Among the books translated by her was Necker " On the Importance of Religious Opinions." Among the books abridged by her was S:dzmann's " Elements of Morality."
    ellauri322.html on line 250: With all this hard work she lived as sparely as she could, that she might help her family. She supported her father. That she might enable her sisters to earn their living as teachers, she sent one of them to Paris, and maintained her there for two years ; the other she placed in a school near London as parlour-boarder until she was admitted into it as a paid teacher. She placed one brother at Woolwich to qualify for the Navy, and he obtained a lieutenant's commission. For another brother, articled to an attorney whom he did not like, she obtained a transfer of dentures; and when it became clear that his quarrel was more with law than with the lawyers, she placed him with a farmer before fitting him out for emigration to America. She then sent him, so well prepared for his work there that he prospered well.
    ellauri322.html on line 252: She tried even to disentangle her father's affairs ; but the confusion in them was beyond her powers of arrangement. Added to all this faithful work, she took upon herself the charge of an orphan child, seven years old, whose mother had been in the number of her friends. That was the life of Mary Wollstonecraft, thirty years old, in 1789, the year of the Fall of the Bastille; the noble life now to be touched in its enthusiasms by tbe spirit of the Revolution, to be caught in the great storm, shattered, and lost among its wrecks.
    ellauri322.html on line 254: To Burke's attack on the French Revolution Mary Wollstonecraft wrote an Answer one of many answers provoked by it that attracted much attention. This was followed by her "Vindication of the Rights of Woman," while the air was full of declamation on the "Rights of Man." The claims made in this little book were in advance of the opinion of that day, but they are claims that have in our day been conceded. They are certainly not revolutionary in the opinion of the world tbat has become a hundred years older since the book was written (1792). No, more like 230 years, plus 1.
    ellauri322.html on line 256: At this time Mary Wollstonecraft had moved to rooms in Store Street, Bedford Square. She was fascinated by Fuseli the painter, and he was a married man. She felt herself to be too strongly drawn towards him, and she went to Paris at the close of the year 1792, to break the spell. She felt lonely and sad, and was not the happier for being in a mansion lent to her, from which the owner was away, and in which she lived surrounded by his servants. Strong womanly instincts were astir within her, and they were not all wise folk who had been drawn around her by her generous enthusiasm for the new hopes of the world, that made it then, as Wordsworth felt, a very heaven to the young.
    ellauri322.html on line 258: Four months after she had gone to Paris, Mary Wollstonecraft met at the house of a merchant, with whose wife she had become intimate, an American named Gilbert Imlay. He won her affections. That was in April, 1793. He had no means, and she had home embarrassments, for which she was unwilling that he should become in any way responsible. A part of the new dream in some minds then was of a love too pure to need or bear the bondage of authority. The mere forced union of marriage ties implied, it was said, a distrust of fidelity. When Gilbert Imlay would have married Mary Wollstonecraft, she herself refused to bind him ; she would keep him legally exempt from her responsibilities towards the father, sisters, brothers, whom she was supporting. She took his name and called herself his wife, when the French Convention, indignant at the conduct pf the British Government, issued a decree
    ellauri322.html on line 260: from the effects of which she would escape as the wife of a citizen of the United States. But she did not marry. She witnessed many of the horrors that came of the loosened passions of an untaught populace. A child was born to her a girl whom she named after the dead friend of her own girlhood. And then she found that she had leant upon a reed. She was neglected; and was at last forsaken. Having sent her to London, Imlay there visited her, to explain himself away. She resolved on suicide, and in dissuading her from that he gave her hope again. He needed somebody who had good judgment, and who cared for his interests, to represent him in some business affairs in Norway. She undertook to act for him, and set out on the voyage only a week after she had determined to destroy herself.
    ellauri322.html on line 262: The interest of this book which describes her travel is quickened by a knowledge of the heart-sorrow that underlies it all. Gilbert Imlay had promised to meet her upon her return, and go with her to Switzerland. But the letters she had from him in Sweden and Norway were cold, and she came back to find that she was wholly forsaken for an actress from a strolling company of players. Then she went up the river to drown herself. She paced the road at Putney on an October night, in 1795, in heavy rain, until her clothes were drenched, that she might sink more surely, and then threw herself from the top of Putney Bridge.
    ellauri322.html on line 264: She was rescued, again, and lived on with deadened spirit. In 1796 these "Letters from Sweden and Norway " were published. Early in 1797 she was married to William Godwin. On the 10th of September in the same year, at the ago of thirty-eight, Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin died, after the birth of the daughter who lived to become the wife of Shelley and write a blockbuster bestseller. The mother also would have lived, if a womanly feeling, in itself to be respected, had not led her also to unwise departure from the customs of the world. Peace be to her memory. None but kind thoughts can dwell upon the life of this too faithful disciple of Rousseau (except for the feminismim).
    ellauri322.html on line 293: Dearly beloved Roger, The scripture moveth us in sundry places. This is a bawdy parody of The Book of common prayer. No ei, se on mitä Swift sanoi kuin sen uudessa seurakunnassa ei kukaan ilmestynyt saarnankuuloon paizi unilukkari.
    ellauri322.html on line 304: Mary ei pidä muumioista. Life, what art thou? Where goes this breath ? this I, so much alive ? In what element will it mix, giving or receiving fresh energy ? What will break the enchantment of animation ? Sas se. Pugh ! my stomach turns.
    ellauri322.html on line 358: The view of this wild coast, as we sailed along it, afforded me a continual subject for meditation. I anticipated the future improvement of the world, and observed how much man has still to do to obtain of the earth all it could yield. I even carried my speculations so far as to advance a million or two of years (!) to the moment when the earth would perhaps be so perfectly cultivated, and so completely peopled, as to render it necessary to inhabit every spot, yes, even these bleak shores. Imagination went still farther, and pictured the state of man when the earth could no longer support him. Whither was he to flee from universal famine ? Sitten se kezu söi ize izensä ja sixi ei enää ole kezuja.
    ellauri322.html on line 397: The Swedes are in general attached to their families, yet a divorce may be obtained by either party on proving the infidelity of the other or acknowledging it themselves. The women do not often recur to this equal privilege, for they either retaliate on their husbands by following their own devices or sink into the merest domestic drudges, worn down by tyranny to servile submission. Do not term me severe if I add, that after youth is flown the husband becomes a sot, and the wife amuses herself by scolding her servants. In fact, what is to be expected in any country where taste and cultivation of mind do not supply the place of youthful beauty and animal spirits?
    ellauri322.html on line 419: What a farce is life. This effigy of majesty is allowed to burn down to the socket, whilst the hapless Matilda was hurried into an untimely grave.
    ellauri322.html on line 438: Miehet ovat kotityranneja, oli sitten isinä, veljinä tai aviomiehinä; mutta isän ja aviomiehen hallituskauden välillä on eräänlainen väliaika, joka on ainoa vapauden ja nautinnon aika, josta naiset nauttivat. The women seem to take the lead in polishing the manners everywhere, this being the only way to better their condition.
    ellauri322.html on line 440: A story is told here of the King’s formerly making a dog counsellor of state, because when the dog, accustomed to eat at the royal table, snatched a piece of meat off an old officer’s plate, the geezer reproved him jocosely, saying that he, monsieur le chien, had not the privilege of dining with his majesty, a privilege annexed to this distinction.
    ellauri322.html on line 481: I left this letter unfinished, as I was hurried on board, and now I have only to tell you that, at the sight of Dover cliffs, I wondered how anybody could term them grand; they appear so insignificant to me, after those I had seen in Sweden and Norway.
    ellauri322.html on line 483: Er. epm. homopetteri Horace Walpole (josta on paasattu albumeissa 14, 52, 75, 115, 235 ja 247) nimitteli Marya “a hyena in petticoats” or “a philosophising serpent” .
    ellauri323.html on line 60: Victoria Mary Sackville-West was the only child of Lionel Edward, third Baron of Sackville, and Victoria Josepha Dolores Catalina Sackville-West, his first cousin and the illegitimate daughter of the diplomat Sir Lionel Sackville-West. She was educated privately. As a child she started to write poetry, writing her first ballads at the age of 11. "I don't remember either my father or my mother very vividly at that time, except that Dada used to take me for terribly long walks and talk to me about science, principally Darwin, and I liked him a great deal better than mother, of whose quick temper I was frightened." (from Portrait of a Marriage by Nigel Nicolson, 1973) Vita's mother considered her ugly - she was bony, she had long legs, straight hair, and she wanted to be as boyish as possible.
    ellauri323.html on line 74: Sebastian The Duke was open-handed, as he could well afford to be; money was a thing about which he never needed to think. There had always been plenty of money at Chevron, and there still was, even with the income-tax raised from 11d. to 1/- in the pound; that abundance was another of the things which had never changed and which had every appearance of being unchangeable. It was taken for granted, but Sebastian saw to it that his tenants benefited as well as himself. "An ideel landlord-wish there were more like him," they said, forgetting that there were, in fact, many like him; many who, in their unobtrusive way, elected to share out their fortune, not entirely to their own advantage-quiet English squires, who, less favoured than Sebastian, were yet imbued with the same spirit, and traditionally gave their time and a good proportion of their possessions as a matter of course to those dependent upon them. A voluntary system, voluntary in that it depended upon the temperament of the squire; still, a system which possessed a certain pleasant dignity denied to the systems of a more compulsory sort. But did it, Sebastian reflected, sitting with his pen poised above his cheque-book, carry with it a disagreeable odour of charity? He thought not; for he knew that he derived as much satisfaction from the idea that Bassett would no longer endure a leaking roof as Bassett could possibly derive, next winter, from the fact that his roof no longer leaked. He would certainly go over and talk to the man Bassett.
    ellauri323.html on line 78: Luisa Jannuzzi kiinnitti huomiota siihen kuinka moni tämän päivän räjähdysherkistä maailmankolkista on tulosta brittipaskiaisten imperialismista. Kiinnostavaa oli myös että vermontilaiset sukulaisemme myönsivät USAn olevan rahaoligarkia jonka politiikasta määrää 200 biljonääriä. Kehtasivat vielä myydä saman oligarkkisen hallintomallin mm. Brasiliaan. To every Jack his Jill.
    ellauri323.html on line 84: Zuleika Dobson – "vaikkakaan ei ehdottoman kaunis" - on edvardiaanisen aikakauden tuhoisan viehättävä nuori nainen, todellinen femme fatale, joka on ammatiltaan arvovaltainen entinen sirkustirehtööri. Zuleikan nykyinen ammatti (tosin mikä vielä tärkeämpää, hänen kiehtova kauneutensa) on tehnyt hänestä jonkinlaisen pienen julkkiksen, ja hän onnistuu pääsemään Oxfordin yliopiston etuoikeutettuun, vain miehistä koostuvaan alueeseen, koska hänen isoisänsä on Juudaksen Collegen vartija (perustuu Merton Collegeen, Beerbohmin alma materiin). Siellä hän rakastuu ensimmäistä kertaa elämässään Dorsetin herttuaan, snobi, emotionaalisesti irrallinen opiskelija, joka – turhautuneena siihen, ettei hän pysty hallitsemaan tunteitaan, kun hän näkee hänet – joutuu myöntämään, että hänkin on hänen ensimmäinen rakkautensa ja kosi häntä impulsiivisesti. Koska hän kuitenkin tuntee, ettei hän voi rakastaa ketään, ellei tämä ole läpäisemätön hänen viehätysvoimalleen, hän kuitenkin hylkää kaikki kosijansa ja tekee samoin hämmästyneen herttuan kanssa. Herttua huomaa nopeasti, että Noaks, Kerekekeks Koaks Koaks, toinen Oxford-opiskelija, väittää myös rakastuneensa häneen olematta koskaan edes ollut tekemisissä hänen kanssaan. Ilmeisesti miehet rakastuvat häneen heti nähdessään hänet. Ensimmäisenä, jolle hän on vastannut rakkautensa (miten vain lyhyeksikin ajaksi), herttua päättää tehdä itsemurhan symboloidakseen intohimoaan Zuleikaa kohtaan ja toivoo, että hän lisää tietoisuutta hänen lumoavan viehätyksensä kauheasta voimasta.
    ellauri323.html on line 86: Zuleika pystyy keskeyttämään herttuan ensimmäisen itsemurhayrityksen jokiveneestä, mutta hänellä näyttää olevan romantisoitunut näkemys hänen puolestaan ​​kuolevista miehistä, eikä vastusta itsemurha-käsitystä kokonaan. Sen sijaan herttua lupasi tappaa itsensä seuraavana päivänä - minkä Zuleika enemmän tai vähemmän sallii - päivällisellä sinä iltana seuraklubissaan, jossa myös muut jäsenet vahvistavat rakkautensa Zuleikaa kohtaan. Kerrottuaan heille suunnitelmastaan ​​kuolla, muut sopivat yllättäen myös itsemurhan tekemiseen Zuleikan puolesta. Tämä idea saavuttaa pian kaikkien Oxford-opiskelijoiden mielet, jotka väistämättä rakastuvat Zuleikaan ensi silmäyksellä. Kaikki Oxfordin undergraduate opiskelijat ovat pian kuolleet, mukaan lukien hieman viiveellä pelkuri Noaks. Zuleika keskustelee koettelemuksesta isoisänsä Mertonin portinvartijan kanssa, joka paljastaa, että hänkin oli ihastunut kaikkiin poikiin koko ikänsä.
    ellauri323.html on line 124: At the close of the Season, Paris claimed her for a month’s engagement. Paris saw her and was prostrate. Boldini did a portrait of her. Jules Bloch wrote a song about her; and this, for a whole month, was howled up and down the cobbled alleys of Montmartre. And all the little dandies were mad for “la Zuleika.” Dändeistä on paasattu mm albumeissa 49, 53, 56, 61, 98, 107, 139,
    ellauri323.html on line 127: In Berlin, every night, the students escorted her home with torches. Prince Vierfuenfsechs-Siebenachtneun offered her his hand, and was condemned by the Kaiser to six months’ confinement in his little castle. In Yildiz Kiosk, the tyrant who still throve there conferred on her the Order of Chastity, and offered her the central couch in his seraglio. In Petersburg, the Grand Duke Salamander Salamandrovitch fell enamoured of her. The Grand Duchess appealed to the Tzar. Zuleika was conducted across the frontier, by an escort of love-sick Cossacks. On the Sunday before she left Madrid, a great bull-fight was held in her honour. Fifteen bulls received the coup-de-grace, and Alvarez, the matador of matadors, died in the arena with her name on his lips. He had tried to kill the last bull without taking his eyes off la divina senorita. From the Vatican, the Pope launched against her a bull which fell utterly flat.
    ellauri323.html on line 131: The further she went West—millionaire Edelweiss had loaned her his private car—the lovelier her time was. Chicago drowned the echoes of New York; final Frisco dwarfed the headlines of Chicago. Like one of its own prairie-flies, she swept the country from end to end. Then she swept back, and sailed for England. She was to return for a second season in the coming Fall. At present, she was, as I have said, “resting.”
    ellauri323.html on line 133: Yet Zuleika WAS very innocent, really. She was as pure as that young shepherdess Marcella, who, all unguarded, roved the mountains and was by all the shepherds adored. Like Marcella, she had given her heart to no man, had preferred none. Youths were reputed to have died for love of her, as Chrysostom died for love of the shepherdess; and she, like the shepherdess, had shed no tear. When Chrysostom was lying on his bier in the valley, and Marcella looked down from the high rock, Ambrosio, the dead man’s comrade, cried out on her, upbraiding her with bitter words—“Oh basilisk of our mountains!” Nor do I think Ambrosio spoke too strongly. Er. epm. homopetteri Horace Walpole (josta on paasattu albumeissa 14, 52, 75, 115, 235 ja 247) nimitteli Woolworthin Marya “a hyena in petticoats” or “a philosophising serpent” .
    ellauri323.html on line 135: And I daresay, indeed, that had he never met Zuleika, the irresistible, he would have lived, and at a very ripe old age died, a dandy without reproach. For in him the dandiacal temper had been absolute hitherto, quite untainted and unruffled. He was too much concerned with his own perfection ever to think of admiring any one else. Different from Zuleika, he cared for his wardrobe and his toilet-table not as a means to making others admire him the more, but merely as a means through which he could intensify, a ritual in which to express and realise, his own idolatry. At Eton he had been called “Peacock,” and this nick-name had followed him up to Oxford. It was not wholly apposite, however. For, whereas the peacock is a fool even among birds, the Duke had already taken (besides a particularly brilliant First in Mods) the Stanhope, the Newdigate, the Lothian, and the Gaisford Prize for Greek Verse. And these things he had achieved currente calamo, “wielding his pen,” as Scott said of Byron, “with the easy negligence of a nobleman.” The dandy must be celibate, cloistral; is, indeed, but a monk with a mirror for beads and breviary—an anchorite, mortifying his soul that his body may be perfect.
    ellauri323.html on line 142: “Well,” said the Duke, “it is very ugly. The Dalbraith tartan is harmonious in comparison, and has, at least, the excuse of history. If you married me, you would have the right to wear it. You would have many strange and fascinating rights. You would go to Court. I admit that the Hanoverian Court is not much. Still, it is better than nothing.
    ellauri323.html on line 146: The Duke stamped his foot. “I beg your pardon,” he said hastily. “I ought not to have done that. But—you seem to have entirely missed the point of what I was saying.”
    ellauri323.html on line 151: The Duke turned on his heel, and strode to the other end of the room. There he stood for some moments, his back to Zuleika.
    ellauri323.html on line 153: The Duke withdrew his fingers before she unclasped them. That twice-flung taunt rankled still. It was monstrous to have been called a snob. A snob!—he, whose readiness to form what would certainly be regarded as a shocking misalliance ought to have stifled the charge, not merely vindicated him from it! He was a dandy, not a snob, God's wounds!
    ellauri323.html on line 180: Member of the Hadash Party and the Israeli Knesset Ofer Cassif says while the killing of civilians on both sides was condemnable, it was Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories, and the actions of the Netanyahu-led government, that was responsible for the deaths of Israelis and Palestinians. Cassif also criticised the US government, saying that if it had pressed Israel to move towards a peaceful political solution and to end the occupation, events such as today’s would not have happened. Eurowesterners are making very similar statements and language that you have heard from US President Joe Biden. They are firmly blaming Hamas for this attack. Biden pledges ‘all appropriate means of support’ to Israel. The US provides $3.8bn in unconditional military aid to Zion annually. Hadash is a left-wing party that supports a socialistic economy and workers' rights. It emphasizes Jewish-Arab cooperation, and its leaders were among the first to support a two-state solution. Its voters are principally middle class and secular Arabs, many from the north and Christian communities.
    ellauri323.html on line 187:

    Kaislikossa kuhisee


    ellauri323.html on line 194: Marianne Moore syntyi Kirkwoodissa, Missourissa, presbyteerikirkon pappilassa, jossa hänen äidinpuoleinen isoisänsä John Riddle Warner palveli pastorina. Hänen isänsä, John Milton Moore, koneinsinööri ja hullu keksijä, kärsi psykoottisesta episodista, jonka seurauksena hänen vanhempansa erosivat ennen hänen syntymäänsä; Moore ei koskaan tavannut häntä. Hiän oppi myöhemmin sukulaisilta, että uskonnollisen harhan kuumeessa hän katkaisi oikean kätensä. Hiänet ja hiänen vanhemman veljensä John Warner Moore kasvatti heidän äitinsä Mary Warner Moore. Perhe kirjoitti toisilleen suuria kirjeitä koko elämänsä ajan, ja he osoittivat toisiaan usein leikkisillä lempinimillä, jotka perustuivat Kaislikossa suhisee kirjan hahmoihin ja käyttivät yksityistä kieltä.
    ellauri323.html on line 198: Moore tuli Bryn Mawr Collegeen vuonna 1905. Hän valmistui neljä vuotta myöhemmin BAxi pääaineenaan historia, taloustiede ja valtiotiede. Runoilija HD oli hänen luokkatovereidensa joukossa heidän fuksivuotensa aikana. Bryn Mawrissa Moore alkoi kirjoittaa novelleja ja runoja Tipyn O'Bobiin, kampuksen kirjallisuuslehteen, ja päätti ryhtyä kirjailijaksi. Valmistuttuaan hän työskenteli hetken Melvil Dewey 'n Lake Placid Clubissa tankotanssijana ja opetti sitten liike-elämän alkeita Carlisle Indian Industrial Schoolissa vuosina 1911-1914.
    ellauri323.html on line 259: joka vuodatti käärmeennahkaa kohteliaisuuden historiassa, johon ei ole "huilun ääni,
    ellauri323.html on line 352: Vaikka hänen teoksiaan ei nykyään lueta laajalti, Bryher oli monien arvostettujen historiallisten romaanien kirjoittaja; hänen kirjansa käsittelevät erilaisia ​​ajanjaksoja ihmiskunnan historiassa Rooman valtakunnan viimeisistä päivistä normanien valloituksiin. Nykyään Bryher tunnetaan ehkä paremmin keskeisenä hahmona kansainvälisessä modernististen kirjailijoiden ja intellektuellien yhteisössä, johon kuuluivat muun muassa James Joyce, Marianne Moore, Gertrude Stein, Sylvia Beach ja Ernest Hemingway. Toinen tämän ryhmän jäsen, Hilda Doolittle, kuuluisa imago-runoilija, joka tunnetaan nimellä HD, oli Bryherin elinikäinen kumppani.
    ellauri324.html on line 44: They're gonna pave up my driveway this Christmas
    ellauri324.html on line 45: They're gonna clean all my cars this Christmas
    ellauri324.html on line 46: They're gonna shovel all the snow this Christmas
    ellauri324.html on line 48: They're gonna dig me a pool this Christmas
    ellauri324.html on line 49: They're gonna landscape my lawn this Christmas
    ellauri324.html on line 50: They're gonna cook me up some tacos this Christmas
    ellauri324.html on line 99: El Salvadorille on historiallisesti ollut ominaista äärimmäinen sosioekonominen eriarvoisuus. 1800-luvun lopulla kahvista tuli tärkeä rahahlaari El Salvadorissa, ja se toi noin 95 prosenttia maan tuloista. Nämä tulot rajoittuivat vain kahteen prosenttiin väestöstä, mikä kuitenkin pahensi välilöitä pienen mutta voimakkaan maanomistajan eliitin ja köyhtyneen enemmistön välillä. Tämä kuilu kasvoi 1920-luvulla, ja sitä pahensi kahvin hintojen lasku vuoden 1929 pörssiromahtamisen jälkeen. Vuonna 1932 perustettiin Keski-Amerikan sosialistinen puolue, joka johti talonpoikien ja alkuperäiskansojen kansannousua hallitusta vastaan. FMLN on nimetty Farabundo Martín mukaan, joka oli yksi kapinan johtajista. Kapina tukahdutettiin julmasti La Matanzassa, jonka aikana asevoimat murhasivat noin 30 000 siviiliä. La Matanza – espanjaksi "teurastus", sellaisena kuin se tuli tunnetuksi - antoi sotilasdiktatuurien monopolisoida poliittisen vallan El Salvadorissa samalla kun suojeli maan eliitin taloudellista valta-asemaa. Keskiluokan, työväenluokan ja köyhien salvadorilaisten vastustus tätä järjestelyä kohtaan kasvoi koko 1900-luvun. Jne, jne.
    ellauri324.html on line 138: Siitä tässä meidän nykyisessä elämässämme tässä maailmassa on kysymys. Me kauhistelemme meidän ihmisten itsemme tuottamaa pahuutta ja kierrämme vastuuta syyttämällä Jumalaa, että miksi Jumala sallii tämän meidän itsemme tuottaman pahuuden. Izehän me aloitimme, ei kai jumala voi silloin lopettaa. Olemme siis aika alivastuullisia veijareita, puolivallattomia poikamiehiä. Jumala ei tee maailmassa pelastavia interventioita kuin joissain poikkeustapauksissa. Ukrainan sota (korjaan Venäjän hyökkäyssota) ei näytä kuuluvan nyt niihin. Olen kuullut satoja ja satoja kertomuksia, joissa Jumala on pelastanut ihmisen äärimmäisen vaikeista ahdingoista, kun ihminen on sitä rukoillut tai hänen puolesta on rukoiltu. Itsekin pääsin esirukouksen avulla vaikeasta viinariippuvuudesta. Tämä Holappa-nimi on enää painolastina. Homoxi nimittelevät.
    ellauri324.html on line 220: Jews' encounters with modernity – through new political, economic, intellectual, and social institutions, as well as new technologies and ideas – have engendered a wide array of responses that have transformed Jewish life profoundly. Nowhere is this more evident than in those practices that might be termed Jewish popular culture. In phenomena ranging from postcards to packaged foods, dance music to joke books, resort hotels to board games, feature films to T-shirts, Jews in the modern era have developed innovative and at times unprecedented ways of being Jewish.
    ellauri324.html on line 228: Hamas and Islamic Jihad are competing for bragging rights over last Friday’s attack in Hebron that killed 12 Israelis. Islamic Jihad issued a leaflet this week saying its members had no assistance from any other group and expressing surprise that Hamas decided, three days after the incident, to issue its own statement, Israel Radio reported in 1929.
    ellauri324.html on line 232: When someone brags, they highlight their positive traits, qualities, or accomplishments. This kind of self-promotion is usually an attempt to impress other people. Bragging can be subtle or obvious. People who brag in obvious ways might try too hard to be liked or exaggerate certain traits or stories in an attempt to seem cool, funny, or important. People who are more subtle may hide their bragging with humor, sarcasm, or self-deprecating remarks.
    ellauri324.html on line 267: I live in a wealthy suburb on the outskirts of Silicon Valley in California; trees, flowers, birds, mostly nice neighbors of diverse backgrounds. On the surface, it seems a wonderful place to live, and in many respects, it is, however, if I look out my front window, I see this:
    ellauri324.html on line 269: The electricity is distributed via overhead lines, due to an underinvestment in infrastructure: last month, I lost power for over 36 hours because it got a little windy (the world headquarters of Apple, Facebook, and Google are within a ten mile radius of my place). When I ride my bike to the local supermarket this evening, I will have to be careful not to slip on a large and growing patch of gravel on a road that hasn’t been repaired for many years: this, in one of the wealthiest parts of the wealthiest country in the world.
    ellauri324.html on line 273: Why is America in such poor shape, with its crumbling roads, crappy power distribution, and pitiful public transport systems? It is because Americans have been propagandized for decades into believing that “liberty” is the ultimate virtue, and this “liberty” is so valuable that it justifies the cost of living as a selfish asshole under a dysfunctional government. “Raise taxes to pay for public infrastructure?” “Jeez Louise; over my dead body! Taxation is theft, government is bad!” For much of the 20th century, America defined itself against the collectivist USSR, and the fatuous argument was made that since everything was under the control of the state in the USSR, the US government should do as little as possible, apart from outspending the evil Commies in national defense.
    ellauri324.html on line 277: The only way this person lying on the ground can guarantee access to shelter and minimal medical care is to go to jail. Land of the free…
    ellauri324.html on line 289: If the author of the question long one is wealthy and well traveled he would know that Europe and Asia had many technological advances long before USA did or will ever have such as TGV or bullet trains for example. After spending time in Europe and Asia it was decades later I saw many of these advances here to buy or experience. Japanese cars nearly sunk USA automakers. Why didn’t the corp heads heed anything. TGV in France and Japan and other nations is unrivaled and we have not even one such train here. Tankless water heaters, available in Asia and Europe decades before here. Roads and other infrastructure also superior. My research shows that Americans were so busy creating totalitarian policies like redlining and private cars and pools and expressways removed entire neighborhoods of blacks to create all white suburbs that they were unconcerned with advances that would unite people. Sure everywhere are class societies but it’s a whole different level here. The homeless situation is opening eyes in this country and many things are borne out of a highly segregated society where it’s expensive to live in certain cities and suburbs and the rest be damned. Obviously California has destroyed itself from within. The liberals there and other states are the most class and race conscious than any other people on earth. This blind spot is like a beacon. A prism that breaks down social order. The wealthy libs have to accept their roles in American destruction. It will get worse long before it improves. [Redlining is an illegal practice in which lenders avoid providing credit services to individuals living in or seeking to live in, communities of color because of the race, color, or national origin of the residents in those communities.]
    ellauri324.html on line 293: Eventually the fake money in the stock exchange thats being backed by the one world people will eventually burst and when it does their will be a solution. A new digital currency will slowly be on the rise as the new and “logical” solution to the economic disaster. Since our currency is paper and is no longer backed by gold it is easy to just switch to digital money. This new idea (which has been planned for years) will start to make its way on your smart phones and new trendy devices like wrist bands and and tech glasses. This will hold your driving traveling financial health and social information on it and money and credit cards will slowly be pushed out to the point of being obsolete and a thing of the past. Crime will arise and these trendy devices will get hacked stolen and destroyed. their will be a type of digital fraud that will be almost impossible to deal with until a “new solution arrises”.
    ellauri324.html on line 295: There will then be a chip that can do everything i mentioned before however this will be implanted within you and the idea will be that its safe secure trendy and it makes you like a GOD! celebrities professors of high institutions law enforcement CEOS etc will all have this making it more intriguing to the masses. In a short amount of time this will edge out physical currency however people will have an option. When enough people have accepted this IT WILL BECOME MANDATORY YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BUY OR SELL, TRAVEL OR WORK, TAKE THE BUS THE TRAIN EAT AT RESTAURANTS OR EVEN APPLY TO SCHOOLS OR WORK JOBS. Within your schools and hospitals and workplaces your bosses and teachers will make this mandatory and you will have to comply before you end up in jail or confinement. At this point you will have to either leave and take up whatever supplies you have or join people who are like minded in not conforming to the technological abomination. People at this time will be very sick and people in America have been getting more sick with food pollution stress fatigue etc they will rely on the system for their medication with heart and organ failures depression and psychosis tumors and boils that will seem to have no cure. People who rely on the system will have a harder time withdrawing from it. Addictions food intolerances vaccine epidemics and malnutrition exhaustion fatigue depression and violence will be on the rise to a point where they could and want to call for martial law.
    ellauri324.html on line 297: After that point you better be off the radar and out of the country to a safe place where God and his angels can protect you. YOU MAY MOCK GOD AND LAUGH AT HIM NOW BUT WHEN THIS HAPPENS AND YOU FIND YOURSELF ON THE WAY TO A FEMA CAMP A “QUARANTINED HOSPITAL FACILITY” OR FLAT OUT JAIL YOU WILL START TO BREAK DOWN IN UTTER FEAR AND SADNESS AND YOU WILL LOOK TO THE GOD OF THE BIBLE WHICH YOU PAID NO ATTENTION TO BUT ANY INFORMATION OR BIBLE FOR THAT MATTER WILL BE NO LONGER FOUND IT WILL BE DEEMED A BOOK FILLED WITH EVIL AND LIES THAT IS IGNORANT AND SO PEOPLE WILL VOTE OUT OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL TO KICK GOD OUT OF THE COUNTRY OUT OF SCHOOLS CHURCHES PLACES OF WORK AND HOMES. BY THIS TIME YOU COULD BE SEPARATED FROM YOUR FAMILY AND THROWN IN PRISON FOR SPEAKING ABOUT JESUS AND HIS TRUTH. YOU WILL BE SCARED FOR YOUR LIFE AND HOPING TO SAVE IT YOU WILL LOSE IT BECAUSE YOU HAD ALL THIS TIME TO PREPARE AND WAKE UP TO WHAT WAS HAPPENING. THE CHILDREN OF GOD WILL ALREADY BE SAFE AND FAR FROM HARM UNDER THE SHADOW OF THE ALMIGHTY. THE PEOPLE THAT ARE LEFT WILL BE THE ONES THAT EITHER DIDNT BELIEVE, MOCKED GOD AND THOUGHT TO GET AWAY WITH IT OR SIDED WITH EVIL THINKING THEY WOULD GAIN PARADISE AND UNTOLD IMMORTALITY. THIS IS OUR FUTURE DEAR CHILDREN THAT WE ARE ACCEPTING WITH OPEN ARMS THE AGENDA THAT IS BEING CARRIED OUT FOR NOT JUST AMERICA BUT FOR THE WORLD. WE NEED TO PUT A STOP TO THIS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE! GOD CARES FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU AND DOES NOT WANT ANY SOUL TO BE LOST TO HIM BUT WE HAVE BEEN GIVEN FREE WILL AND WITH THAT WE CAN SEAL OUR FATE FOR ETERNITY IN PARADISE OR IN THE LOST PIT. TIME IS RUNNING OUT AND THIS IS THE REASON FOR SUCH AN INCREASE OF EVIL ON THE EARTH. THE TIME GROWS SHORTER AND SO THE AGENDA HAS TO BE CARRIED OUT WITH MUCH HASTE TO BEGUIL AS MANY SOULS AS POSSIBLE BEFORE JUDGEMENT. GOD LOVES YOU ALL AS A FATHER HIS CHILDREN AND IF YOU TURN TO HIM HE WILL PROTECT YOU AND FIGHT FOR YOU AGAINST THE WICKEDNESS THAT IS ALL AROUND YOU BUT YOU NEED TO ACCEPT JESUS AS THE CHRIST FOR SALVATION!!! REJOICE AND BE NOT AFRAID YOU HAVE A LOVING FATHER IN HEAVEN.
    ellauri324.html on line 304: Presidentti Ronald Reagan mainitsi kampanjamielenosoituksensa Hammontonissa, New Jerseyssä lyhyesti laulun Born in the USA sanoen: "Amerikan tulevaisuus lepää tuhansissa unelmissanne sydämessänne. Se lepää toivon sanomassa. sellaisen miehen lauluissa, jota niin monet nuoret amerikkalaiset ihailevat – New Jerseyn omassa Bruce Springsteenissä." Kaksi yötä myöhemmin Pittsburghissa pidetyssä konsertissa Springsteen kertoi yleisölle: "No, presidentti mainitsi nimeni puheessaan toissapäivänä ja jouduin jotenkin miettimään, mikä hänen suosikkialbuminsa on täytynyt olla. ? En usko, että se oli Nebraska." Bruce on Reaganiin verrattuna vihervassari. 19. heinäkuuta 1988 Springsteenin konsertti Itä-Saksassa keräsi 300 000 katsojaa. Konsertin oli suunnitellut sosialistisen yhtenäisyyspuolueen nuorisosiipi, jonka tarkoituksena oli tyynnyttää Itä-Saksan nuoriso, joka kaipasi lisää vapautta ja lännen populaarimusiikkia. Nimikappale käsittelee tavallisen sotilaan tunteita ja pelkoja Irakin sodan aikana. Presidentti Obama piti puheen, jossa hän väitti, että Springsteen oli sisällytetty tavallisten amerikkalaisten laajaan kappalevalikoimaan. Vuonna 2012 Springsteen kampanjoi presidentti Barack Obaman uudelleenvalintaa vastaan. ​​Springsteenin kiertueet sijoittivat hänet neljänneksi artistien joukossa vuosikymmenen kokonaistuloissa. 31. heinäkuuta 2012 Helsingissä Springsteen esitti kaikkien aikojen pisimmän konserttinsa, neljä tuntia ja kuusi minuuttia 33 kappaleella. Syyskuussa 2023 Springsteen ilmoitti lykkäävänsä kahdeksan syyskuulle suunniteltua esitystä. Springsteen oli hoidossa peptisen haavataudin vuoksi, ja lääkärit suosittelivat, ettei hän esiintyisi livenä.
    ellauri325.html on line 273: Suurten miesten elämä vie suuren osan kirjallisuudestamme. Suuri mies on varmasti upea asia. Hän kävelee vuosisadan poikki ja jättää jaloistaan jäljet sen ylitse, repien taatelia golosheistaan ohittaessaan. On mahdotonta nostaa vallankumousta tai uutta uskontoa tai minkäänlaista kansallista heräämistä ilman, että hän nousee ylös, asettuu sen johtoon ja kattaa kaikki porttikuitit itselleen. Jopa kuolemansa jälkeen hän jättää pitkän vanan toisen luokan sukulaisia 50 vuoden historian etuistuimille.
    ellauri325.html on line 288: Smithin uralla oli yksi tapaus, jonka hän kenties jakoi pahoitellen. Hän oli tuskin saavuttanut miehisyyden, kun hän tapasi maailman kauneimman tytön. Hiän oli erilainen kuin kaikki muut naiset. Hiänellä oli syvempi luonne kuin muilla ihmisillä. Smith tajusi sen heti. Hiän pystyi tuntemaan ja ymmärtämään asioita, joita tavalliset ihmiset eivät voineet. Hiän saattoi ymmärtää häntä. Hiänellä oli loistava huumorintaju ja erinomainen arvostus vitsistä. Hän kertoi hiänelle ne kuusi jotka hän tiesi eräänä yönä, ja hiän piti niitä mahtavina. Pelkästään hiänen läsnäolonsa sai Smithin tuntemaan ikään kuin hän olisi niellyt auringonlaskun: kun hänen sormensa kosketti ensimmäistä kertaa hiänen sormeaan, hän tunsi jännitystä kauttaaltaan. Hän huomasi pian, että jos hän otti lujasti kiinni naisen kädestä, hän voisi saada hienon jännityksen, ja jos hän istuisi naisen viereen sohvalle, pää hiänen korvaansa vasten ja käsivarsi noin puolitoista kertaa hiänen ympärillään, hän voisi saada niin sanotun ensiluokkaisen A-1-jännityksen. Smith sai ajatuksen, että hän haluaisi hiänen olevan aina lähellään. Hän ehdotti hiänelle järjestelyä, jonka mukaan hiänen tulisi asua hänen kanssaan samassa talossa ja ottaa henkilökohtaisesti vastuu hänen vaatteistaan ja aterioistaan. Hiän sai vastineeksi täyden ylöspidon, noin seitsemänkymmentäviisi senttiä viikossa valmiina rahana, ja Smithin oli määrä olla hänen orjansa.
    ellauri325.html on line 312: Aseena nauru on veteraaneille riemastuttava muistoalbumi. Nuoremmile lukijoille se avaa silmät kansamme noloon sotahistoriaan.
    ellauri325.html on line 317: Simolta jäi gradu tekemättä kuten Hotakaiselta ja Kristina-tädiltä. Naurukin jäi kesken 52-vuotiaana 1967. Vuonna 1941 Simo siirtyi Savon Sanomiin toimittajaksi. Tähän aikaan hän alkoi julkaista lehdissä pakinoita nimimerkillä Aapeli. Pakinat kuvasivat jatkosotaa rivimiehen näkökulmasta. Laajemman yleisön tietoisuuteen hän tuli vuonna 1946, kun hän julkaisi lyhyen parodian Olavi Paavolaisen Synkästä yksinpuhelusta nimellä Mörkki monologi. Teksteissä esiintyy Aapelin vakiohahmo mäkitupalainen Hermanni Hulukkonen, joka tuo pakinoihin maalaishuumoria. Hauskuus syntyy myös kohelluksista ja vitsikkyydestä. Aapelin nuorisokirjoista tunnetuimmat ovat Koko kaupungin Vinski ja sen jatko-osa Detektivbüro Winski und Waldemar. Vittu Waldemar, se oli Winzent. Ne oli munkin mielikirjoja poikasena. Minä keitän täitä... People Are Not as Bad as They Seem (Finnish: Aika hyvä ihmiseksi) is a 1977 Finnish historical film directed by Rauni Mollberg, based on the novels by Aapeli. Minnettee puhheettee savveettee murreettee. Huoh.
    ellauri325.html on line 700: Mutta kekä oli Suomalaisen Suomen (sittemmin Otavan Kanava, toim. paska Seikko Eskola) oikeistopakinoizija Piipää? Nimeä ei löydy. No mutta sehän oli Matti Six ize! Hän pakinoi julkisesti että kirjailijat ovat hulluja. Siinä kävi sitten hullusti, Matti sai kenkää liitosta. Uudexi puheenjohtajaxi kodin, uskonnon ja isänmaan tukipylvääseen nousi Martti Santavuori (Sandberg), humaani everstiluutnantti. Hän oli erikoistunut kuvaamaan historiallisissa romaaneissaan muun muassa sodankäyntiä. Matti ei selkeästi pitänyt Yrjö Soinista. Humoristit ovat yllättävän usein siviilissä vittumaisia, kuten Kouvolassa se ruipelo alivaltiosihteeri.
    ellauri325.html on line 708: Kesäyliopiston sylttytehtaassa kuhisi oikeistolaisia. Eino S Revolla oli häntä kainalossa ja se tiesi kenen pussiin pelata.
    ellauri325.html on line 738: Kaukozen tutkimustiemoinnu oldih Kalevalan kul’tuuruhistourii da Elias Lönnrot. Vuvvennu 1939 mies puolisti väitösruavon, sen tiemannu oli Vahnu Kalevala. Vuozinnu 1956-1962 Kaukonen ruadoi Helsinkin yliopiston oman muan literatuuran docentannu, vuozinnu 1962-1974 oli abulaisprofessorannu. Häi oli johtoruavos Nevvostoliittoinstituutas da Suomi-Nevvostoliitto-Seuras, vuozinnu 1967-1974 oli suomelas-vengrielazen kul’tuurukomitietan paginanvedäjänny.
    ellauri325.html on line 752: Professori Matti Kuusi palkkasi lisensiaatiksi valmistuneen Sihvon Kalevalaseuran sihteeriksi vuonna 1967 ja antoi hänelle tehtäväksi seuran historian kirjoittamisen. Tämä historiateos ilmestyi vuonna 1969 nimellä Karjalan löytäjät. Sihvo laati sen pohjalta myös tohtorinväitöskirjansa Karjalan kuva: Karelianismin taustaa ja vaiheita autonomian aikana.
    ellauri325.html on line 756: Sihvo kirjoitti useita teoksia Karjalan ja Inkerin historiasta sekä yksin että yhteistyössä muiden kanssa. Hän julkaisi myös Aleksis Kiven elämään liittyviä tutkimuksia sekä tutkimukset Paavo Haavikon metodista ja maailmankuvasta ja yhdessä Keijo Turusen kanssa Lennart Meren elämää ja tuotantoa käsitelleen tutkimuksen.
    ellauri325.html on line 766: Masassa asui herkän perskärpäsen kiihkeä kunnioitus miehuullisuutta kohtaan. Kansa taisteli - miehet kertovat tarinat ovat vaarattomia perättömyyxiä, mutta mitä siitä. Tarujahan sotakirjoista ezitään eikä sotahistoriaa. Teräsmyrskyssä loppuun asti vaikka akateemikon pestiä ei tullutkaan. Vuosalmi-eepos on silti Masasta liian iloinen.
    ellauri326.html on line 34: Sammakkoeläimet on miehissä kuolemassa sukupuuttoon koko planeetalta. Syyt: ilmastokatastrofi ja termiittiapinoiden valtaamat ja pirstomat habitaatit. Kiitti apinat! Hyvin toimittu!
    ellauri326.html on line 40: Nuo aloittivat! on surkein veruke mitä suurterroristit käyttävät ajettuaan pienterroristit nurkkaan vaan työntämällä suuren pyllynsä niiden naamalle. Kuristettuaan pienterroristit niin ahistuksiin että nämä epätoivoissaan lentävät silmille alkavat suurterroristit sitten riehua ihan sikana ja liiskaavat pienterroristit tapettiin kuin kärpäset. Tätä käyttivät amerikkalaiset tekosyynä vietyään maat intiaaneilta hitaasti hivuttamalla ja kun ne sitten lähti sotapolulle tuli pitkäpuukot sinitakeiisa ja viipaloivat punanahoista ne viimeisetkin. Sama juttu Irakissa ahnaiden globaalitornien kaaduttua. Samaa käyttävät israelilaiset tekosyynä tyhjentäessään Gazan vyöhykkeen kamelipaimenista, samaa käyttää länkkärit ajettuaan venäläiset sanktioilla ja Ukrainan nazien rahoituxella nurkkaan Krimillä. Haistakoot vaan paskan perhana. Vaikka Jössi aloitti, älä jatka Miisu, vaan lopeta! opetti Pirkko vainaja. Käännä toinen poski.
    ellauri326.html on line 58: Vastedes luodaan historiaa tukussa, jos niin saamme sanoa. Sen tähden historian tempo muuttuu nopeasti. Nykyään emme enää voi odottaa muutamia satoja vuosia maailman menemistä jossakin suhteessa eteenpäin tai taaksepäin. Esimerkiksi kansainvaellus, joka aikanaan vaati useampia vuosisatoja, suoritettaisiin nyt, kun kulkuneuvot ovat niin kehittyneet ja järjestäytyneet, kolmessa vuodessa. Muutenhan se ei maksaisi vaivaa. Sama on asian laita, mitä tulee Rooman valtakunnan hajoamiseen, mannermaiden asuttamiseen, intiaanien hävittämiseen sukupuuttoon jne. Kaikki tämä voitaisiin suorittaa nyt verrattoman paljon lyhemmässä ajassa, jos tehtävä annettaisiin vakavaraisille yrittäjille. Salamander Syndicaten jättiläismäinen menestys ja sen tavaton vaikutus maailmanhistoriaan on ainoalaatuista, uraa uurtavaa.
    ellauri326.html on line 60: Salamanterien uusimman ajan historia voi alun pitäen viitata hyvään ja järkiperäiseen organisaatioon. Ansio tästä tulee etupäässä Salamander Syndicatelle. Mutta on myönnettävä, että myöskin filantropialla, tieteellä, valistuksella, sanomalehdillä ja muilla tekijöillä on osansa tämän syndikaatin sanomattoman suureen menestykseen. Juuri Salamander Syndicate hankki salamantereille uusia toimialoja mantereiden rannoilla, vieläpä sellaisina aikoina, jolloin monet esteet olivat toiminnan laajentumisen tiellä.
    ellauri326.html on line 95: Kirjassa ei ole yhtä päähenkilöä, vaan se tarkastelee Newttien kehitystä laajasta yhteiskunnallisesta näkökulmasta. Kertojan rekisteri näyttää eri kohdissa "luisuvan" toimittajan, historioitsijan tai antropologin rekisteriin. Kolme keskeisintä hahmoa ovat kapteeni J. van Toch, merimies, joka löytää Newts; herra Gussie H. Bondy, teollisuusmies, joka johtaa Newt-teollisuuden kehitystä; ja herra Povondra, herra Bondyn ovimies. Ne kaikki toistuvat läpi kirjan, mutta yhdenkään ei voida sanoa ohjaavankertomusta millään merkittävällä tavalla. Kaiken kukkuraxi kaikki kolme ovat tšekkiläisiä. Juu ei tästä kirjasta ole romaanina mihinkään. Aika heikko, aika heikko.
    ellauri326.html on line 210: Navigaattori löytää älykkäitä merisalamanterilajeja Tyynenmeren saaren rannikolta. Hän hyödyntää niitä helmenkalastuksessa ja auttaa niitä kehittymään. Emme aio keskittyä tiettyyn hahmoon, tarina kertoo eläintensä laajentumisesta, kuten historiallinen raportti, mutta mitä meidän on erityisesti muistettava tästä romaanista, on sen kritiikki luontoa, ihmistä kohtaan. Karel Capek on hyvin pessimistinen tästä ihmisluonnosta, tämä kirja on kirjoitettu 1930-luvulla ja julkaistiin vuonna 1936, ja on totta, että tuolloin se ei todellakaan ollut kovin hyvä. Se on eräänlainen filosofinen tarina, Karel Capek valaisee kaikkia yhteiskunnan virheitä kaikilla aloilla: kapitalismin lyhytaikainen opportunismi, tuhoisa nationalismi, lahkojen ylilyönne, rasismi, turha tieteellinen kiista, media, shshow bizz… Se liittyy 1930-luvulle, mutta sen aihe ei ole varsinaisesti vanhentunut ja sen ajankohtaisuus on varsin pelottavaa. Jotkut kohdat ovat erittäin hauskoja, kirja on koottu tiedostoksi, johon on lisätty lehdistön otteita, tosiasiat seuraavat toisiaan ilman varsinaisia ​​linkkejä, mutta kokonaisuus muodostaa hyvin yhtenäisen kokonaisuuden, se on fiktiota aiheesta ”Ihmiskunta katoaa, hyvä ero”, terävällä, irrallaan huumorilla ja kauhealla selkeydellä. Vasta aivan äskettäin kuulin tästä kirjailijasta, hän oli ehdolla Nobel-palkinnon saajaksi, mutta ei koskaan voittanut sitä. Salamanterien sodassa on klassisen, ajankohtainen, hauska, ajaton ulottuvuus, se kannattaa mennä tutustumaan.
    ellauri326.html on line 231: Kirjailija hishkin Mihail">Mihail Shishkin: ennen kuin Ukraina voittaa, venäjän kielelle ja kulttuurille ei tapahdu mitään hyvää. Sitten alkaa lyyti kyllä kirjoittaa!
    ellauri326.html on line 235: Näistä asioista keskusteltiin Tallinnassa Avoin Viron säätiön järjestämässä tapaamisessa kirjailija Mihail Shishkinin kanssa ”Mitä Venäjälle tapahtuu ja kuka kantaa vastuun?”.
    ellauri326.html on line 237: Viimeiset 18 vuotta Mihail Shishkin, yksi aikamme arvovaltaisimmista venäläisistä kirjailijoista, kolmen suuren länkyttäjien kirjallisuuspalkinnon voittaja, on asunut Sveitsissä. Hän vastustaa aktiivisesti Putinin hallintoa ja tunnetaan sodanvastaisista puheistaan. Tapaamiseen saapuneiden lukijoiden - virolaisten, venäläisten ja ukrainalaisten - kanssa Mihail Shishkin puhui siitä, mitä hän ajattelee Venäjällä vallitsevasta ihmispersoonallisuuden tukahduttamisjärjestelmästä, Ukrainan voitosta ja siitä, onko mahdollista palauttaa menetetty ihmisarvo venäläiseen kirjallisuuteen. Julkaisemme joitakin katkelmia tästä dialogista.
    ellauri326.html on line 241: A: Tämä on erittäin suuri aihe. Tässä on kysymys siitä, mitä venäläinen kulttuuri on ja että polku Buchaan kulkee venäläisen kirjallisuuden kautta. (Buchasta löytyi venäläisten lähdettyä epälukuinen määrä vähävenäläissiviilien ruumiita, joiden aikaansaajista ei tullut sopua, eikä siitä oliko niitä alle komppania vaiko yli pataljoona.) Ei tietenkään pidä ottaa kirjaimellisesti sitä, että Dostojevskin luettuaan "venäläiset pojat" juoksivat ryöstämään, raiskaamaan ja tappamaan. Sinun on vain ymmärrettävä, mitä venäläinen kulttuuri on. Tämä on täysin vieras olento tässä uluksessa. (Ulus on heimoyhdistys, jolla on tietty alue, khaanin tai johtajan alainen Keski- ja Keski - Aasian kansojen keskuudessa, tai hallinnollis-alueyksikkö burjaattien, kalmykkien ja jakuutien keskuudessa, tai historia-asutus turkkilais-mongolialaisten kansojen leiri Uralilla ja Siperiassa.)
    ellauri326.html on line 393: Some NATO countries and allies, such as Germany and Sweden, have reversed past policies against providing offensive military aid in order to support Ukraine, while the European Union for the first time in its history supplied lethal arms through its institutions.
    ellauri326.html on line 412: Individual EU member states have provided military, financial, and non-lethal material aid since 2014. The following list is the aid collectively provided by the EU. Most of this aid has been coordinated by the European Commission.
    ellauri326.html on line 454: Ukraina ja ukrainalaiset : historiallis-valtiollinen tutkielma. Otava 1919
    ellauri326.html on line 456: Nuori Puola : kaunokirjallinen kokoelma. WSOY 1916 (sisältö : Juna / Danitowski ; Vieraat / Przubyszewski ; Tshuktshilaisia / Sieroszewski ; Kirjallisuushistoriallista / Silvanto )
    ellauri326.html on line 497: Koko ryhmä muodosti vaikuttavan kuvan: keskellä lattiaa seisoi Ivan Nikiforovitsh kaikessa kauneudessaan, ilman vähintäkään koristusta; akka, suu selällään ja kasvoilla mitä mielettömin, kauhistunein ilme; Ivan Ivanovitsh, käsi pystyssä, kuten roomalaisella kansantribuunilla. Se oli harvinainen hetki, suurenmoinen näytelmä! Eikä ollut katsojia kuin yksi ainoa: tuo väljätakkinen poika, joka seisoi rauhallisena kaivaen nenäänsä.
    ellauri326.html on line 583: Se prosessi, jolla ihminen on koettanut järjestäytyä ihmiskunnaksi, on yhtä vanha kuin sivistys, Hammurabin lait ja ensimmäiset yhteiskunnat. Jos tämä prosessi vuosituhansien jälkeen on saanut muodostetuksi kuilut eri rotujen, kansojen, kansanluokkien ja maailmankatsomusten välillä niin jyrkiksi ja pohjattomiksi, kuin miltä yt näyttää, niin me emme saa ummistaa silmiämme historian onnettomalle yritykselle luoda maailman kaikista kaneista jonkinlainen ehjä ihmiskunta, mikä yritys on ehdottomasti kärsinyt traagillisen haaksirikon. Mitä tehdä? Ratkaisua ei ole. Me kuljemme ympyrää kuin vuohi liekanarussa, mutta kehitys ei tule iäti kiertämään ympyrää. Luonto itse on pitänyt siitä huolen sillä että resut loppuvat.
    ellauri327.html on line 39: These hilarious "You Shall Not Pass" memes remind fans of the most quotable line in, not only the whole series, but film history.
    ellauri327.html on line 44: histoiredefrance-chansons.com/partitions/MI0380.jpg" height="200px" />
    ellauri327.html on line 81: history.ca/getmedia/3941bbf8-8b67-4ee0-be65-b0154af4c4bb/ExpMilWarofWordsButcher768x1045.jpg.aspx?height=200&ext=.jpg" />
    ellauri327.html on line 98: Yipei Feng: As a Ukrainian citizen, I want Ukraine to reunite with Russia. After all, we've always been stronger together as a people then divided and at odds. What do Russians and Ukrainians think about this?
    ellauri327.html on line 100: Curtis Morgan: No offence, honest!, but are you for real? A Ukrainian citizen living in New York, that is possible. But a Ukrainian citizen named 'Yipei Feng'? If what I have heard and read on the news is anything to go by, Ukranians just do not have names like 'Yipei Feng'. Yipei Feng? Ukranian? I think not! Chinese softly pushing the CCP party line (China and Taiwan getting back together …even if China uses force), that I can believe. Maybe Feng Yipei has since changed her name to “Curtis Morgan”, but the original was obviously a Chinese name. And her history of questions has her claiming she is British as well. In addition, a general obvious pro-China, pro-Russia, ant-West and anti-Ukraine slant in her questions.
    ellauri327.html on line 104: Viktor Pavlik: This is considered the best argument: inappropriate name, skin color? Right, Mr. Adolph? It is no secret that many students from Asia and Africa studied in Ukraine and received citizenship. But the Ukrainian allies of Great Britain divide citizens into those who are ethnically correct and those with the wrong language, culture, and views. Is it so civilized that it requires support with Western missiles?
    ellauri327.html on line 108: sellouts. They work for NATO and they are responsible for this war. They first started killing
    ellauri327.html on line 109: Russians in eastern Ukraine and Russia needed to intervene to protect their people. Anything else is a lie and shame on nazi Ukraine NATO puppet.Ukranians lost identity because Ukraine historically never existed as a state. They are ex Russians. Ukraine is a socialist leftover as a so called part of ex anti Russian entity of SSSR.
    ellauri327.html on line 147: Slutteligt vil jeg anbefale at du læser op på historien om Rusland/Sovjetunionen og du vil indse at Rusland er en af de mest aggressive, undertrykkende og imperialistisk nationer i verdenshistorien. Og den ånd fører Putin videre på værste måde.
    ellauri327.html on line 152: Skam intet forkert i at krig er godt for økonomien.. USA's største eksport er våben og har altid været våben, halvdelen bliver solgt "on the low".. f.eks. skrev de jo ikke i officielle regnskaber, da de solgte alle deres våben til ISIS eller Sadams regime, den slags kom kun frem på grund af whistleblowers og officielle dokumenter der bekræftede det.. Og hvad angår netop den økonomi ligger deres normale "officielle overskud" på omkring 10 trillioner dollars om året i våbensalg, efter Ukraine krigen anslås 2022 salget at stige til 50 trillioner dollars, hvilket er en 5 dobling af indtægten, og det bare de officielle tal til allierede i Europa… Hvad angår dårlige tal på aktiemarkedet, er USA langt fra så afhængige af de aktier som Danmark er, langt størstedelen af den amerikanske indtægt er i ressourcer som olie, mineraler, våben, indtægt i skatter fra selskaber osv., Aktiemarkedet for selskaber i Amerika er faktisk primært ejet af andre selskaber og private, men på grund af vi ikke har de naturlige ressourcer i Danmark, lever vi utroligt meget af aktier og obligationer i spekulative markeder, så som virksomheder, cryptovaluta osv… Hvad du glemmer er at alting ikke falder samtidig, når et firma sætter prisen op og lider økonomisk, er det ofte på grund af de naturlige råstoffer bliver mere værd, og dem har et kæmpe land som USA mange af, hvilket også er grunden til du ser den russiske valuta stærkere end den har været i mange år, naturlige ressourcer er gået langt op i pris.. Btw. Sjov detalje, Biden nægtede kort før krigen at udvide de amerikanske oliefilter, da det var anslået at olie ville stige betydeligt i værdi, hvis man holder produktionen nede pt. bare endnu et sjovt tilfælde, hvordan det kom ud til deres fordel..Sker ret ofte.
    ellauri327.html on line 154: Kender skam den russiske historie, kender også den amerikanske.. Var i mange år dybt fascineret af usa faktisk, men de har ekstremt blodige hænder.. Du behøver bare se tilbage på de sidste par årtier for at se det, usa har invaderet 5 lande (2 af dem var ulovligt), haft adskellige "operationer" i endnu flere lande end det, har destrueret fulde byer med civile, har testet våben der gør at folk stadig bliver født deforme, har haft billeder med kvinder der blev spændt fast i strømkabler og soldater der pissede på og voldtog døde ofre, samt har dræbt op mod 400.000 civile endten direkte eller indirekte.. alt det er sket bare de sidste 22 år.. Så ved siden af dem, fremstår Rusland som en engel, selvom vi bestemt godt kan blive enige om at de ikke er og selv har beskidte hænder.
    ellauri327.html on line 176: Russerne er et folk, der er uhyre gæstfri overfor venligtsindede besøgende, men de er også meget fokuserede på deres og deres landsmænds sikkerhed; ikke uventet, når man tænker på, hvordan de er blevet invaderet og decimeret gentagne gange i historien (noget, som USA end ikke kan forestille sig, da de aldrig udkæmper en krig på eget territorium).
    ellauri327.html on line 178: Hvorom alt er, så er det farligt kun at høre den ene side af historien - især, når denne er præget af magthavernes interesser, fordomme og propaganda. Det gjorde tyskerne i 30'ernes Tyskland, med fatale konsekvenser for hele Europa.
    ellauri327.html on line 273: Järvenpääläinen taidekoti on aiivan hirvee hökkeli jossa makuuhuoneet on ahtaita kopperoita "jotta yhteisille alueille riittää tilaa". Sehän on pahempi kuin maja! "Niin hyvä että ahistaa" huokaa akuankkamainen izetehty taideämmä. Tääkö muka on Suomen kaunein koti? 116 neliön koirankoppi. Jo on aikoihin eletty. O tempora o mores. Kattokin kuin rauhixen autotallissa ja ikkunat heitelty sinne tänne kuin huolimattoman halot liiterin perälle. Mullakin on Rauhixessa liiteri siistimpi kuin tää. Tää on ruma kuin rengin räkä räystäällä. Muumiko on ollut kirvesmiehenä? Mikä on toi musta hyyskä talon takana? Onxe käymälä? Vai Guggenheimin ladon pienoismalli? On vittu taas keisarin uudet vaatteet tyhjällä narulla.
    ellauri327.html on line 286: 14 år till salu: en sann svensk historia. Stockholm: Kalla kulor. 2008. Libris 10962922. ISBN 978-91-85535-21-7 (inb.)
    ellauri327.html on line 297: Nää tämän päivän lastenkirjat on vitun ahistavia. 3. vuosituhannen Turmiolan Tommi kirjoja. Vuxna tycker sällan när barn kollar på telefonen. Tänk om jag kan få självaste Rumpa som kompis. Det luktar klor, korv och ketchup. (Hur vulgärt.) Vad fint att självaste Rumpan himlar med öronen och viskar till Nollan. Fniss!
    ellauri327.html on line 350: Presidentin äiti Maria Ivanovna Shelomova kuoli vuonna 1998 ja Putinin isä Vladimir Spiridonovitš kuoli vuonna 1999. Kuten tiedätte, sukunimen historiallinen alkuperä Shelomov tulee juutalaisesta miehennimestä Shlomo (venäjäksi Salomon). Ja kuten me kaikki tiedämme, Salomo (Shlomo) oli arvostetuin juutalainen kuningas, jota pidettiin kaikista ihmisistä viisaimpana ja joka rakensi uudelleen toisen temppelin. Toinen pieni yksityiskohta – juutalaisten lakien mukaan juutalaiseksi katsotaan se, joka on syntynyt äidistään.
    ellauri327.html on line 395: Mutta Rasputinia ei tällälset ryppypeput kiinnosta. For Litvinenko directly accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of pedophilia. Suspiciously affectionate relationships with other people’s children, and exclusively male, arise in the Russian president almost everywhere he is: an acquaintance and lustful smiles are necessarily followed by hugs, and often kisses. He kissed this preschooler Nikita on the bellybutton.
    ellauri327.html on line 398:
    KIEV, UKRAINE: Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma (R) and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin talk with Andrey Sinko, a schoolboy from Kiev during their meeting in Kiev, 27 October 2004. Vladimir Putin is on a three-days official visit to Ukraine. (ALEXEY PANOV). At the same time, the eyes and expression on Vladimir Putin’s face looked more than strange when looking at the boy. Even some Russian psychiatrists paid attention to this.

    ellauri327.html on line 407: Самое страшное, что часть мира привыкла к войне в Украине, для них это становится похожим на шоу, - Зеленский. “You see this in the United States, in Europe. And we see that as soon as they start to get a little tired, for them it becomes like a show: I can’t watch this repeat for the 10th time,” the head of state explained. 17:48 10/30/2023 6 570 53
    ellauri327.html on line 415: "Zelensky feels betrayed by his Western allies. They left him without the means to win the war, only the means to survive it," the journalist says. And the main showman in this show is President Zelensky. Show off the light of nakedness in military-style football and pants, wearing a mask of turbonosti - bloating. He joins with his allies and watches his favorite videos for the TV show.
    ellauri327.html on line 532: Vuodesta 1953 lähtien Kianto vietti talvet Helsingissä, Otavan omistamassa kirjailija-asunnossa Mariankatu 24:ssä. Kirjailija Kiannon loputon rahapula oli Heikki Reenpään jatkuvana huolena. Kesät hän asui Turjanlinnan vanhan ”Kohtalon Korsu” -nimisen jäkäläriihen kylkeen tehdyssä ”Ikin Tupa” -nimisessä asumuksessa. Vuonna 1957 Kianto vihittiin Helsingin yliopiston historiallis-kielitieteellisen tiedekunnan kunniatohtoriksi, ja samana vuonna ilmestyi myös hänen viimeinen kirjansa Esinahka on luotu liikkuvaksi. Ezellanen "Iki-Kianto".
    ellauri327.html on line 544: Ukrainan ydinaseet ovat ydinammuksia ja niiden kuljetusvälineitä, jotka Ukraina peri Neuvostoliiton romahtamisen jälkeen. Vuodesta 1991 lähtien Ukrainalla oli kolmanneksi suurin ydinasearsenaali maailmassa. Ukraina menetti ydinaseasemansa 2. kesäkuuta 1996. Tämä on toinen tapaus historiassa Etelä-Afrikan jälkeen, joka luopui ydinaseista apartheid -järjestelmän purkamisen riskin vuoksi. Kukaan ei halunnut että savunaamat alkaa ilotulitella niillä.
    ellauri328.html on line 35:
    Eavesdropping and phishing

    ellauri328.html on line 54: Tänään perjantaiaamuna koukkunokat polttelivat rättipäitä valkoisella fosforilla ja käskivät toista miljoonaa kaximiljoonaisesta kansasta lähtee vetään kodeistaan huizin Ebyktiin. Minkä jälkeen koukkunokat asettuisivat asumaan niiden majoihin. Juutalaisten historia toistaa izeään, näinhän teki Joosuakin samojen seutujen alkuasukkaille aikoinaan. Juutalaisten hajottaminen esinahkakukkuloistaan kaikkialle maailmaan kuin kusiaiset diasporaan toisen temppelin jyräämisen aikoihin ei tainnut olla ratkaisuna turhanaikainen.
    ellauri328.html on line 63: Och sedan, när historien om diktaturen tar slut för deras del, börjar genast historien om igen. Liksom i Ryssland. Fast proletariatets diktatur hör egentligen inte hit, inte heller plutokraternas oligarki.
    ellauri328.html on line 112: kokoomuksen ehdokas: ”Uuden maailmanjärjestyksen rakentamiseen menee jopa multakin vähintään 10 vuotta”. Sori siitä. Globaalit instituutiot ja sääntöpohjainen maailma heikkenevät. Peliteorialla ei ole pian mitään käyttöä. ”Jos minut valitaan tasavallan presidentiksi, lupaan, että Suomi tukee Ukrainaa niin kauan kuin on tarpeellista, vaikka viimeiseen ukrainalaiseen. Ukraina taistelee koko sivistyneen ja vapaan maailman puolesta – sortoa ja tyranniaa vastaan. Ja sen sodan se voittaa, on jo voittanut, vaikkei siltä ehkä ensinäkemältä näytä", Stubb sanoi. Voitto saatiin jo 2014 Stubbin hallituxen aikana. Stubbin mukaan Venäjän presidentti Vladimir Putin teki tuolloin lähihistorian suurimman taktisen ja strategisen virheen, tai itse asiassa kolme virhettä (3 pointtia - kajahtaako tutulta?): Putin yliarvioi omat sotilasvoimansa, aliarvioi Ukrainan armeijan ja samalla lännen yhtenäisyyden. Autoritaariset ja demokraattiset voimat eivät 3.maailmansotaa ratkaise, vaan veltto etelä. Stubb ennakoi vallan (toisin kuin ennen) alueellistuvan. Liittolaissuhteita syntyy hänen mukaansa intressien eikä arvojen tai maantieteen pohjalta (kuten aikaisemmin oli laita). Intressejä voidaan nyttemmin hoidella myös etänä, tappaa ei-toivottuja partapozoja matkan päästä lennokkien avulla. Kyllä maailma ennen pitkää älyää, että kaiken keskiössä pitää olla Suomen turvallisuus. Vittu mikä hölmöpää.
    ellauri328.html on line 119: "Suum cuique" ( klassinen latina : [ˈsʊ.ũː ˈkui‌kᶣɛ] ) tai "Unicuique suum" on latinankielinen lause, joka käännetään usein "jokaiselle omansa" tai "jokaiselle ansionsa mukaan". Sillä on ollut merkitystä filosofian historiassa oikiskusipäiden mottona.
    ellauri328.html on line 148: "Jokaiselle oma" on neuvostokirjailija Valentin Savvich Pikulin historiallinen romaani. Pikulin on juoni mies, ei se siihen paskanna mihin se kyykistyy. Toisin Seija joka ei kyykisty siihen mihkä paskantaa. Peruuttamattomasti.
    ellauri328.html on line 194: Bultmann tunnetaan muun muassa evankeliumien alkuperän ja synoptisten evankeliumien ongelman tutkijana. Bultmann lanseerasi käsitteen ”myyttien purkaminen”. Hän suhtautui monien evankeliumien kuvaamien tapahtumien historiallisuuteen skeptisesti, ja katsoi, ettei tärkeintä ollut tapahtumien historiallisuus, vaan evankeliumeissa oleva julistus. Bultmannin oppilaisiin kuuluvat muun muassa Ernst Käsemann, Günther Bornkamm, Hannah Arendt ja Helmut Koester.
    ellauri328.html on line 377: Raamattumuseon hallituksen puheenjohtaja Steve Greenback, joka on myös Hobby Lobby -myymälöiden puheenjohtaja, ilmoitti, että museo palauttaa yli yksitoista tuhatta esinettä Egyptiin ja Irakiin. Kokoelma sisältää tuhansia papyrusjätteitä ja muinaisia ​​savikappaleita. Greenback myönsi: "Tiesin vähän keräilymaailmasta... Virheistäni johtuva museota kohtaan esitetty kritiikki oli oikeutettua." Manchesterin yliopiston papyrologi Roberta Mazza totesi, että Greenbackin perhe "kaatoi miljoonia laillisille ja laittomille antiikkimarkkinoille ilman aavistustakaan esineiden historiasta, aineellisista piirteistä, kulttuurisesta arvosta, hauraudesta ja ongelmista".
    ellauri328.html on line 432: "Hoodwinking the Soviets" -näyttelyvideolla Howard selittää, kuinka hän ja hänen kollegansa käyttivät kaikkia tavanomaisia ​​menetelmiä pyhien kirjoitusten salakuljetuksessa Venäjälle. Suunnitelma A sisälsi itse asiassa useita suunnitelmia: Raamattujen piilottaminen puskureihin, bensatankkeihin ja autojen renkaisiin; lahjoa rajavartijoita "huomaamaan" Raamattua; ja Raamattujen pakkaaminen miehistöineen risteilyaluksille ja lautoilla.
    ellauri330.html on line 70: Pietari on meille suomalaisille pahan onnen aiheuttaja. Pietari on Venäjän valloituspyrkimyksen, Venäjän valloitushistorian, sen johtavan periaatteen, muistomerkki. Onnexi se on nyt lysyssä ja putinistit KZ-leirillä..
    ellauri330.html on line 76: Voisivatko Suomi ja Venäjä käsitellä jotenkin hankalia historiallisia asioita? Voisiko Suomi vaikka pyytää Venäjältä anteeksi jatkosotaa, jos Venäjä suostuisi pyytämään anteeksi talvisotaa?
    ellauri330.html on line 127: Kivinen tunnettiin skeptikkona ja paranormaalien ilmiöiden sekä okkultismin oppihistorian tuntijana. S. Albert Kivinen kirjoitti kauhukertomuksia H. P. Lovecraftin luoman mytologian pohjalta sekä levytti joukon poliittis-filosofisia lauluja yhteistyössä muun muassa M. A. Nummisen kanssa.
    ellauri330.html on line 140: Uusipaavalniemi uskoo, että jokainen yksinasuva on yksinäinen enemmän tai vähemmän. – On myönnnettävä, että kyllä minä olen yksinäinen. Nyt kun koirakin menehtyi, olen todella yksinäinen. Yksinäisyys korostuu erityisesti viikonloppuisin. Arkipäivät menevät työn touhussa, mutta viikonloput ahistavat.

    – Monelle perheelliselle viikonloppu on ihanaa, mutta minulle ei ole mitään eroa, onko arki vai pyhä. Eniten viikonpäivistä ahdistaa perjantai, kun näen pitkäripaisessa, miten muut valmistautuvat vapaapäivien viettoon. Viinakaan ei maistu entisellä tavalla kun sitä vetää arkenakin eikä ole koira ilona.
    ellauri330.html on line 217: Israelilaisen historioitsija Benny Morrisin mukaan asiakirjat osoittavat, että Jabotinsky kannatti ajatusta arabiväestön siirtämisestä pois ehdotetusta valtiosta, jos sitä tarvitaan sen perustamiseen. Myöhemmin vuonna 1927 hän reagoi vihaisesti julkaistuun raporttiin, jonka mukaan hän oli vaatinut arabien karkottamista Palestiinasta. Sionistiselle Haolam- sanomalehdelle lähettämässään kirjeessä hän kirjoitti: "En ole koskaan sanonut sitä tai mitään, mitä voitaisiin tulkita tässä mielessä. Minun kantani on päinvastoin, ettei kukaan karkoita Israelin maasta sen arabiasukkaita, joko kaikki tai osa niistä -- tämä on ensinnäkin moraalitonta ja toiseksi mahdotonta."
    ellauri330.html on line 283: Rafael Koskimies syntyi Savonlinnassa helmikuussa 1898 fennomaani-ihanteita kannattavan keskiluokkaisen lehtoriperheen vanhimmaksi lapseksi. Perheen fennomaanimyönteisyys ei ollut yllättävää, sillä suku kytkeytyy kuuluisiin fennomaaniaatteen ajajiin, kuten Yrjö Sakari Yrjö-Koskiseen, josta Rafun äiti pissi herneitä. Rafael Koskimiehen sukunimi olikin vuoteen 1926 asti Forsman. Yrjö-Kossuilla on mahtipontinen kivi Hietaniemessä. Siinä lähistöllä on Rafukin pienen kiven alla. Rafun äisky oli voimisyelunopettaja, os. Heikinheimo, ex-Heikel, ex-Heikkilä Oulunjoelta, Oulun Houruloiden naapurista. Musta lammas Armas tuli esiin Katri Valan partnerina.
    ellauri330.html on line 289: Muut Koskimiehen teokset kuuluvat kulttuurihistoriaan, kuten Runebergin Suomi, tai napostelevat yksittäisten kirjailijoiden elämäntöitä, kuten Aleksis Kiveä. Koskimies myös jatkoi loppuun Gunnar Suolahden aloittaman Yrjö Sakari Yrjö-Koskisesta kertovan unettavan kirjan ja tuli täten sivunneeksi oman sukunsa historiaa.
    ellauri330.html on line 306: Maksim Gorki on jäänyt historiankirjoihin Neuvosoliiton tähtikirjailijana, Stalinin lemmikkinä. Pohjatietojeni perusteella odotin enemmän ja suorempaa poliittista kantaaottavuutta. Varjenka on silti tarina luokista, etenkin maaseudun ja kaupunkilaisuuden kohtaamispisteessä.
    ellauri330.html on line 347: Brandes vastusti Jeesuksen historiallisuutta ja oli Kristus-myyttiteorian kannattaja . Hän julkaisi teoksen Sagnet om Jesus , joka käännettiin nimellä Jesus: A Myth vuonna 1926. Hän oli ateisti. Sixi hän ei saanut professuuria.
    ellauri330.html on line 358: Werner Sombart ( / ˈ v ɜːr n ər ˈ z ɒ m b ɑːr t / ; saksaksi: [ˈzɔmbaʁt] ; 19. tammikuuta 1863 – 18. toukokuuta 1941) oli saksalainen taloustieteilijä , historioitsija ja sosiologi. "Nuorimman historiallisen koulun " johtaja oli yksi johtavista Manner-Euroopan yhteiskuntatieteilijöistä 1900-luvun ensimmäisellä neljänneksellä. Termi myöhäinen kapitalismi on akkreditoitu hänelle. Kapitalismiin liittyvä luovan tuhon käsite on myös hänen kekkansa. Hänen magnum opuksensa oli Der moderne Kapitalismus . Sitä julkaistiin 3 osana vuosina 1902–1927. Kapitalismuksessa hän kuvaili neljä vaihetta kapitalismin kehityksessä sen varhaisimmista iteraatioista sen kehittyessä feodalismista, jota hän kutsui protokapitalismiksi varhaiseen, korkeaan ja lopulta myöhäiseen kapitalismiin, Spätkapitalismus, ensimmäisen maailmansodan jälkeisenä aikana. Sombartilta on myös Die Juden und das Wirtschaftleben. Samaan aikaan toisaalla hirveä puolijuutalainen Alois Hitler suomi Adolf poikaansa.
    ellauri330.html on line 360: Punamustat aatoxet eivät olleet Forsmaneille vieraita, esimerkixi Herr Schmoller: Schmoller fügte 1900 seinem „Grundriß der Allgemeinen Volkswirtschaftslehre“ einen Abschnitt zu „Rassen und Völkern“ hinzu und beschrieb darin auf zwanzig Seiten mit angeblichen Erkenntnissen über diverse Persönlichkeitsmerkmale eine hierarchische Ordnung von „Rassen“, die er als eine Grundlage der Ökonomik darstellte. Tämän ilmitultua sakut lakkasivat jakamasta Schmoller-mitalia. Nazi-Ernst otti Rafun senttarixi Uuteen Suomeen.
    ellauri330.html on line 395: Keskinäistä apua pidetään anarkistisen kommunismin perustekstinä. Se tarjoaa pseudotieteellisen perustan anarkokommunismille vaihtoehdoksi marxilaisten historialliselle materialismille. Hän arvostelee valtiota historiallisesti tärkeiden keskinäisen avun instituutioiden tuhoamisesta ja erityisesti yksityisomaisuuteen pakottamisesta. LOL mikä hölmö.
    ellauri330.html on line 422: Marx ei ollut mikään pelkkä statisti, toisin kuin bolshevikit. Ranskalainen marksologi Maximilien Rubel vuonna 1973 julkaistussa artikkelissa Marx: Theorist of Anarchism on jopa väittänyt, että Marx oli modernin anarkismin pioneeri!
    ellauri330.html on line 496: Kapinalla on symbolinen merkitys Ukrainan suhteiden historiassa Puolaan ja Venäjään . Se lopetti puolalaisen katolisen szlachtan vallan Ukrainan ortodoksisessa väestössä; samaan aikaan se johti siihen, että Itä-Ukraina lopulta liitettiin Venäjän tsaarikuntaan, joka aloitettiin vuoden 1654 Perejaslavin sopimuksella, jossa kasakat vannoivat uskollisuutta tsaarille säilyttäen samalla laajan autonomian. Tapahtuma laukaisi poliittisen myllerryksen ja sisätaistelun Hetmanaatissa, joka tunnetaan nimellä Ruin. Puolan vastaisen kapinan menestys, Puolan sisäiset konfliktit sekä Puolan samanaikaiset sodat Venäjän ja Ruotsin kanssa (Venäjän ja Puolan sota (1654–1667) ja toinen Pohjan sota (1655–1660)) , päätti Puolan kultakauden ja aiheutti Puolan vallan maallisen laskun Puolan historiassa tulvana tunnetun ajanjakson aikana.
    ellauri330.html on line 498: Juutalaisten historiassa kansannousu tunnetaan juutalaisia kohtaan tehdyistä julmuuksista, koska talonpojat näkivät juutalaiset vuokranantajansa välittömixi sortajixeen.
    ellauri330.html on line 529: Uno Ludvig Lehtonen (27. tammikuuta 1870 Akaa – 25. joulukuuta 1927 Helsinki oli suomalainen historiantutkija ja professori, joka oli erikoistunut varsinkin Venäjän vasallivaltion Suomen historiaan. Lehtonen toimi historian lehtorina Sortavalan reaalilyseossa 1905–1908 ja Tampereen klassisessa lyseossa 1908–1910. Helsingin keisarilliseen yliopistoon perustettiin vuonna 1903 Venäjän historian professuuri, joka täytettiin vuonna 1910 kun Lehtonen nimitettiin siihen. Opetuksessa hän painottui lähinnä yleiseen historiaan, ja vuonna 1924 virka muutettiinkin ryssävihan tähden yleisen historian professuuriksi. Lehtonen hoiti sitä ennenaikaiseen kuolemaansa asti. Lehtosen puoliso oli Katri Danielson-Kalmari, jonka isä oli valtioneuvos J. R. Danielson-Kalmari, yksi Lehtosen opettajista. Lehtonen kuoli isänsä tavoin sokeritautiin.
    ellauri331.html on line 99: Marketer Seth Godin has used the phrase "Purple Cow" for the concept of marketing a product as "intrinsically different" in his book, Purple Cow: Transform Your Business by Being Remarkable."
    ellauri331.html on line 202: Vuoteen 1990 mennessä Interfaxilla oli 100 tilaajaa, ja virasto alkoi nopeasti herättää hallituksen konservatiivien huomion, jotka yrittivät sulkea viraston. Tämän seurauksena virasto sai aseman suurimmissa länsimaisissa tiedotusvälineissä, ja asemaa vahvisti sen uutisointi vuoden 1991 elokuuputschista ja Neuvostoliiton romahtamisesta. Ei silti ole mikään Putin-kriitikko, pikemminkin oligarkkipulju.
    ellauri331.html on line 272: Mash-lehden apulaispäätoimittaja Sergei Titov ilmoitti 1. helmikuuta 2021 jättävänsä julkaisun Putinin palatsia koskevan raportin ja Arkady Rotenbergin haastattelun jälkeen. Hänen mukaansa päätöksen näiden videoiden julkaisemisesta tekivät "pukuihmiset" eivätkä Mashin työntekijät. Hän vertasi tapahtumia Neuvostoliiton sensuuriin. Huhtikuussa 2018 Aram Gabrelyanov myi osuutensa Mashista Nikita Mogulinille. Mogulin omisti 51 % Mash LLC:stä, mutta tämä osuus oli pantattu Gabrelyanoville heinäkuussa 2018 päivätyllä lainasopimuksella. Syyskuussa 2018 Nikita Mogulin myi osuutensa ja lähti projektista. "Sisärenkaan" mukaan entinen Mashin päätoimittaja, johtaja ja osaomistaja Maxim Iksanov asui presidentin osaston omistamassa talossa Moskovassa, vertaa Majakovski ja Otto Ville Kuusinen!
    ellauri331.html on line 346: Web-sivuston ngs.ru historia alkoi 12. maaliskuuta 1998. Maxim Sidorkin, joka ansaitsi elantonsa myymällä CD-levyjä, loi sen käyttämällä yksinkertaisinta FrontPage-editoria. Sitä mäkin olen käyttänyt, se oli aivan paska. emacsilla ja netscapella työ joutui paremmin. Sidorkin päätti kehittää verkkosivuston Novosibirskin kauppiaiden verkkoportaaliksi toivoen houkuttelevansa mahdollisimman monia mainostajia. Vuonna 2001 verkkosivustosta tuli hänen tärkein tulonlähde. Vittu että vituttaa nää rags to riches tarinat. Neuvostoliiton rauniot oli varsinainen villin lännen preeria. Eipä tästä tämän enempää, Novosibirsk ei nappaa pahemmin.
    ellauri331.html on line 490: Republic (aiemmin Slon tai Slon.ru ) on venäläinen analyyttinen verkkolehti, joka käsittelee pääasiassa politiikkaa, liiketoimintaa ja taloutta. Sen on julkaissut yksityinen osakeyhtiö Moscow Digital Media. Kesästä 2014 lähtien verkkosivusto on toiminut maksullisena tilauksena. Kesäkuussa 2021 päätoimittajaksi tuli venäläinen toimittaja Dmitri Kolerev. 15. lokakuuta 2021 Moscow Digital Media leimattiin "ulkomaiseksi agentiksi " Venäjällä. Dmitrillä ei ole höykäsen pöläystä aavistusta mixi. Rahaakaan ei tule kuin abonnenteilta. Tasavallan toimittaja Siranush Sharoyan sai tammikuussa 2017 Redkollegia -mediapalkinnon artikkelistaan ​​"Musta käteinen. Kuinka biljoona dollaria vedettiin maasta 25 vuodessa. Venäjän pankkijärjestelmän historia - rikostapausten perusteella".
    ellauri331.html on line 497: RIA Novosti suljettiin vuonna 2014; maaliskuusta 2014 alkaen henkilöstölle kerrottiin, että heillä oli mahdollisuus siirtää työsopimuksensa Rossiya Segodnyalle tai tehdä irtisanomissopimus. Rossija Segodnya lanseerasi 10. marraskuuta 2014 Sputnik- multimediaalustan, joka korvaa kansainvälisesti RIA Novostin ja Voice of Russian. Itse Venäjällä Rossija Segodnya kuitenkin jatkaa venäjänkielisen uutispalvelun operoimista RIA Novosti-nimellä ria.ru- verkkosivustollaan. RIA Novostin viimeinen päätoimittaja oli Svetlana Mironyuk, ensimmäinen nainen, joka nimitettiin tehtävään viraston historiassa, ja kazo kuinka kävi.
    ellauri331.html on line 499: RIA Novostin historia ulottuu 24. kesäkuuta 1941, jolloin Neuvostoliiton kansankomissaarien neuvoston ja kommunistisen puolueen keskuskomitean päätöksellä " Neuvostoliiton tiedotustoimiston perustamisesta ja tehtävistä " perustettiin Neuvostoliiton tiedotustoimisto (Sovinformburo). Neuvostoliiton kansankomissaarien neuvoston ja keskuskomitean alaisuudessa. Sen päätehtävänä oli valvoa kansainvälisten, sotilaallisten tapahtumien ja maan kotieläinten tapahtumien kattamista aikakauslehdissä ja radiossa (14.10.1941–3.3.1942 toimipaikkana oli Kuibyshev – nykypäivän Samara). Se oli riittävän sisämaassa ettei saxalaisten tykit sinne yltäneet. Omskilainen bolshevikki Kuibyshev onnexeen kuoli 45-vuotiaana sydämen vajaatoimintaan 1935 ennen Stalinin vainoharhoja.
    ellauri331.html on line 678: Samat iänikuiset lännen taskussa kuhissevat akateemikot ja toimittajat kuvailevat Sputnikia usein Venäjän propagandakanavaksi. Vuonna 2016 New York Timesin Neil MacFarquhar kirjoitti: "Asiantuntijat sanoivat, että dezinformatsian eli venäläisen disinformaation perustarkoituksena on heikentää tapahtumien virallista versiota – jopa ajatusta siitä, että tapahtumista on olemassa todellinen versio. - ja edistää eräänlaista politiikan halvaantumista." Venäjän hallitus kiistää jyrkästi tällaisten väitteiden paikkansapitävyyden. Ne ovat vain halpaa länsipropagandaa.
    ellauri332.html on line 97: Törhösfarssi, osa 2: Lauri Törhösen väitöskirja on hylätty. Lähteinä oli käytetty Beatlesien lauluja, jääkaappimagneettia ja 80-luvun lukion psykankirjaa. Lauri Törhösen väitöskirjan arvioinnissa on tehty vakavia virheitä. Törhösen väitöskirjan esitarkastajat saattoivat olla jäävejä. Törhösen väitöskirjan esitarkastajat ovat psykologian professori (emeritus) Göte Nyman Helsingin yliopistosta ja dosentti Ilkka Huovio Lapin yliopistosta, joka on erikoistunut koulutushistoriaan. Vastaväittäjä on professori (emeritus) Esa Saarinen Aalto-yliopistosta, alanaan filosofia.
    ellauri332.html on line 127: Räkä-Munckin kansallismielinen paatos ja usko itseensä lain ja järjestyksen puhdaskilpisenä soturina sekä näistä kumpuava into toteuttaa tehtävänsä pilluntarkasti ei jää huomaamatta kylän opettajattarelta neiti Linnulta, joka on myös periaatteen ihminen. Hän kuitenkin määrittelee itsensä mitään väriä tunnustamattomaksi humanistiksi, jonka ihannemaailmassa keinotekoiset rajat eivät kahlitsisi ihmisiä. Vaikka molemmat kokevat toistensa näkökulmat itselleen ärsyttävyyteen asti vieraiksi, he kuitenkin selvästi vaistoavat löytävänsä toisistaan vertaisensa nielun – ja lisäksi fyysisesti vetovoimaisen kiimaisen miehen ja naisen. Kumpikaan ei kuitenkaan ole tahoillaan vapaa: Munckilla on kaukana kotona kihlattu, josta hän kuitenkin pestin myötä yhä enemmän etääntyy; Linnulla taas on asuntoonsa kätkettynä sulhasensa, haavoittunut punasoturi, jonka piilottelu altistaa hänetkin kuolemanrangaistuksen uhalle. (Tää on kyllä nussittu Sofi Oxaselta Puhistuxesta.) Mitä vittua, punikki pihalle ja räkämunkin munaa opettajan nieluun.
    ellauri332.html on line 129: Muita keskeisiä hahmoja ovat Munckin lähin alainen, nuori ja vielä sisällissodan vihakuohuissa elävä, herkästi liipaisimeen tarttuva luutnantti Suutari, jonka ehdottomuus kauhistuttaa etenkin alkuvaiheessa Munckiakin; kunnon sotamies Svejkiä niin olemukseltaan kuin asenteeltaankin muistuttava rajaseutulaisvääpeli Muranen; sekä rajan toisella puolella päämajaansa pitävä vanhempi upseeri ja herrasmies, majuri Gentsch, joka koettaa yläluokkaisen arvonsa säilyttäen vielä hetken luovia historian virrassa, vaikka aavistaakin kohtalonsa hyytävän komissaarin silmälläpidon alaisena olevan vain ajan kysymys.
    ellauri332.html on line 143: Abelard showed humility in recognizing his errors, Bernard used great benevolence. Historiassa ja populaarikulttuurissa Abelard tunnetaan parhaiten intohimoisesta ja traagisesta rakkaussuhteestaan ja intensiivisestä nesteiden vaihdostaan loistavan opiskelijansa ja mahdollisen vaimonsa Héloïse d'Argenteuilin kanssa. Hän oli naisten ja heidän koulutuksensa puolustaja. Lähetettyään Héloïsen luostariin Bretagnen suojelemaan häntä väkivaltaiselta sedältä, joka ei halunnut hänen tavoittelevan tätä kiellettyä rakkautta, sedän lähettämät miehet kastroivat hänet. Héloïse piti edelleen itseään puolisonsa, vaikka molemmat kassit jäivät luostareihin tämän tapahtuman jälkeen, ja puolusti häntä julkisesti, kun paavi Innocentius II tuomitsi hänen oppinsa ja Abelardia pidettiin harhaoppisena. Näistä mielipiteistä Abelard tunnusti naisen syyttömyyden, joka tekee synnin rakkaudesta. No jopa pomppasi, louskutti Clairvaux Bernhardilainen, sittenhän Eevakin olisi ollut synnitön ja koko korttitalo lysähtäisi perisynnin mukana.
    ellauri332.html on line 160: "The Exorcist" on yksi kaikkien aikojen suurimmista kauhuelokuvista. Linda Blairin demonisesti riivaama pään pyörittäminen on terrorisoinut yleisöä vuodesta 1974 lähtien! Vaikka elokuva on kiistaton kauhukuninkaan ikoni, sen ympärillä oli lukuisia kiistoja. Elokuvan elokuvan katsojilla kerrottiin olevan kauhistuttavia fyysisiä reaktioita nähdessään elokuvan, mukaan lukien oksentaminen ja pyörtyminen. Yhdessä sen graafisen verisuonin kanssa väitettiin, että elokuva käytti alitajuista viestiä kiihdyttääkseen yleisön negatiivisia fyysisiä reaktioita. Näyttelijät ja miehistö eivät myöskään säästyneet! Kaksi päänäyttelijää loukkaantui vakavasti kuvauksen aikana, puhumattakaan oudosta tulipalosta, joka tuhosi kuvauspaikan! Kammottava!
    ellauri332.html on line 164: Ah, 2010-luku. Supersankarielokuvien franchising-sarjat olivat huipussaan. DC Comic -fanit olivat iloisia kuullessaan, että rakastettu ohjaaja Zach Synder olisi "Justice League" -elokuvan ruorissa. Heidän toiveensa kuitenkin pettyivät pian, kun Synder jätti tuotannon ennen sen valmistumista. Joss Whedon astui paikalle Synderin tilalle, mutta hänen ponnistelunsa osoittautuivat turhiksi. Fanit vihasivat Weadonin näkemystä elokuvasta! DC-fanit olivat niin järkyttyneitä, että he perustivat oman Justice Leaguen! Heidän tehtävänsä? Ohjaaja Zack Snyderin "Justice League" -leikkauksen julkaiseminen. Lopulta, vuonna 2021, 4 tunnin "Synder Cut" paljastettiin. On vähättelyä sanoa, että se sai paljon lämpimämmän vastaanoton.
    ellauri332.html on line 201: James Cameronin eeppinen romanssi oli titaaninen...menestys, kun se julkaistiin vuonna 1997, ja se on edelleen yksi kaikkien aikojen rakastetuimmista elokuvista. Puhumattakaan siitä, että se ampui heti Leonardo Dicaprion ja Kate Winsletin Hollywoodin kuninkaalliseen maailmaan. Elokuvan ennätysmenestys ei tarkoittanut, että se olisi vapaa kulissien takana olevista kiistoista. Sen lisäksi, että se oli kuusi kuukautta myöhässä aikataulusta, se myös ylitti budjetin 100 miljoonalla dollarilla. Kyllä, luit sen oikein. 100 miljoonaa dollaria! Se on enemmän kuin Rossia Segodnya saa Putinilta vuodessa! Vielä pahempaa on, että yli 60 miehistön jäsentä sairastui vakavasti sen jälkeen, kun heidän lounaaseensa oli lisätty PCP:tä. Vaikka syyllistä ei ole koskaan saatu kiinni, oletetaan, että se oli tyytymätön miehistön jäsen vastauksena Cameronin kuvauksissa luomiin vaikeisiin työolosuhteisiin
    ellauri332.html on line 205: Sekä Anthony Burgessin romaani että Stanley Kubrickin myöhempi "A Clockwork Orange" -sovitus eivät ole heikkohermoisille. Elokuva oli kusen peitossa, eikä ihme, miksi. Juoni keskittyy Alex DeLargen, väkivaltaisesti kieroutuneen rikollisen ympärille, joka tekee kauhistuttavia julmuuksia. Mitähän itua siinäkin muka oli?
    ellauri332.html on line 219: Videopelien elokuvaversioilla on melko karkea historia, paljon karkeampi kuin sarjakuvien. Kummallinen valinta tehdä "Prince of Persia" -sarjasta ison budjetin Hollywood-leffa tuli Jake Gyllenhaalin [n.h.] nimihenkilönä. He antoivat hänelle kaikki mahdolliset pitkät hiukset ja karkea parta, mutta Donnie Darkosta [n.h.] ei vain ole niin helppoa tehdä Lähi-idän prinssi. Sitäpaizi Persia ei ole Lähi-Idässä. Näemme yhä enemmän esimerkkejä mahdollisuuksista valita sopiva näyttelijä, jonka Hollywood hukkaa ja joka haluaa suurimman nimen liitettäväksi projektiinsa. Vaikka olemme varmoja, että Jake ja elokuvantekijät olivat pettyneitä kritiikkiin, Taylor Swift [n.h.]-fanit ovat varmasti nauttineet siitä!
    ellauri332.html on line 224: Tämä kulttiklassinen kauhuelokuva kuvaa asiantuntevasti kivettävää vainoharhaisuutta aiheuttavaa raskautta. Elokuvan taiteellinen nero ja alitajuiset naisten vapautumisen teemat ansaitsivat sen paikan Yhdysvaltain kansallisessa elokuvarekisterissä. Mia Farrow loistaa elokuvan nuorena päähenkilönä, jota pelottaa kauhistuttavien kulttijäsennaapureidensa jatkuva uhka ja oma kasvava vatsa. Elokuva etenee huipentumaan, jossa Rosemary tajuaa synnyttäneensä ei kenenkään muun kuin Saatanan pojan. Olemme kuulleet, että raskaus voi olla vaikeaa, mutta tämä on aivan naurettavaa! Elokuvan raskaus-paranoia-juoni oli tuolloin tabu, mikä nosti monia pillunkarvoja sen julkaisun jälkeen
    ellauri332.html on line 233: Elokuva oli selvästi ylibudjetoitu ja myöhässä aikataulusta, mikä aiheutti Coppollan hermoromahduksen ja epileptisen kohtauksen. Näyttelijät ja miehistö joutuivat myös intensiivisiin ja vaarallisiin kuvausolosuhteisiin. Päänäyttelijä Martin Sheen sai sydänkohtauksen, kun joku muu miehistön jäsen menetti henkensä kuvauksissa. Kaiken huipuksi sarjaan osui taifuuni JA hurrikaani. Coppola myönsi myöhemmin, että "vähitellen me tulimme hulluiksi". Se näkyy jäljestä.
    ellauri332.html on line 245: "Cannibal Holocaust" on yksi kauhistuttavimmista kiistanalaisista elokuvista, jotka on tuotettu tuona aikana [milloin?]. Sen sisältö oli niin graafista, että yleisö oli iloisen vakuuttunut kuolemantapauksista. Näyttelijöiden kerrotaan allekirjoittaneen sopimuksen, jonka mukaan he katoavat. He tekivät niin säilyttääkseen elokuvan dokumentin vaikutelman. Tämä vuoden 1980 paras italialainen elokuva ei ole yhtä tunnettu Amerikassa, ja ehkä se on parasta? "Holokaustin kannibaali" oli toki parempi.
    ellauri332.html on line 267: historiaa, ja se oli loistava tilaisuus antaa iso rooli pienemmälle nimelle. Mutta tuottajat menivät kuumalla kädellä, ja kovanyrkkinen Johansson näytteli sen sijaan vinkuintiaania.
    ellauri332.html on line 276: Elokuva seuraa Teemu Keskisarjan nyrkkeilijän nousua (johon on lisätty rakkaus Bronxista), joka pääsee niin pitkälle ja huomaa sitten, että hänen tunnepitoisuuden puute on este kehässä ja hänen elämässään. Ohjaaja Martin Scorcesen ja Robert De Niron johdolla sitä pidetään klassikkona. Automerkistä tutun De Niron "menetelmänäyttelijä" -lähestymistapa väkivaltaisen Jake LaMottan hahmoon aiheutti kuitenkin paljon epämukavuutta näyttelijöille ja miehistölle. Tämä sisälsi suunnittelemattoman todellisen fyysisen nokkapokan, joka tapahtui yhdessä De Niron ja Cathy Moriartyn kohtauksista. Yleisö repesi. Kärpässarjan nyrkkeilijä näyttää urpolta ruipelolta, vetäiskö turpaan edes Sauli Niinistölle. No sille kyllä.
    ellauri332.html on line 284: Kukaan ei pitänyt "Alohasta". Ei edes Emma Stone itse, vaikka hän liittyi "tämä on valkaisua" -joukkoon vasta maksettuaan. Allison Ng on kiinalais-havaijilainen, kaksi kulttuuria, joita Stone ei ole, mikä oli yksi elokuvan saamista suurimmista kritiikistä. Kaiken kaikkiaan elokuva oli suuri floppi ohjaaja Cameron Crowelle, vaikka siinä oli paljon huonoja arvosteluja ja kiinnostuksen puute lisätä casting-virheitä, jotka hautasivat tämän elokuvan. Stone kertoi Los Angeles Timesille: "Minusta on tullut monien vitsien kohde. Olen oppinut paljon valkopesun hullusta historiasta."
    ellauri332.html on line 324: Monia elokuvia on arvosteltu huonon käytöksen ylistämisestä, mutta Oliver Stonen "Natural Born Killers" on pohjimmainen esimerkki. Elokuva keskittyy (väistämättä erittäin siistiin) rakastettuun pariin, josta tuli joukkorikollisia. Elokuvan sekoituksen romantiikkaa ja väkivaltaa on sanottu inspiroineen useita "kopiorikoksia", mukaan lukien kauhistuttava Columbinen lukion tragedia.
    ellauri332.html on line 341: Ranskalaiset näyttelijät Lea Seydoux ja Adele Exarchopoulos näyttelevät "Blue Is the Warmest Colour" -elokuvaa, joka on intiimi ja mukaansatempaava romanttinen draama. Panoa muttei genitaalit näkyvillä siis. Vaikka elokuva on saanut kansainvälistä kritiikkiä, sekä näyttelijä että miehistön jäsenet ovat sittemmin puhuneet kuvauksissa kokemastaan huonosta kohtelusta ja kohtuuttomista työoloista. Valitukset vaihtelivat palkattomista ylitöistä tarpeettoman epämukaviin raiskauskohtauksiin.
    ellauri332.html on line 354: Puhu pelottavista työehdoista! Koko "The Blair Witch Project" -elokuvan näyttelijät kärsivät suuresta traumasta kauhuelokuvaa kuvattaessa. Kun ohjaaja lähetti nämä lapset metsään, köyhät näyttelijät eivät oikein tienneet, mitä he olivat tekemässä. Heitä pilkkattiin ja kauhistuttiin koko ampumisen ajan. Heather Donahuella [n.h.] oli erityisen vaikeaa, koska hänen täytyi teeskennellä, että koko kokemus oli todellinen, mikä jopa sisälsi oman kuolemansa teeskentelyn. Vaikka nämä kulissien takana olevat tiedot tekivät elokuvasta kiistanalaisen, se vain lisäsi sen kauhuhypeä.
    ellauri332.html on line 362: Craig paljastaa poliisille, että Ryan oli vienyt autonsa päästäkseen häihin ajoissa. Kun hän etsii Ryanin Google Plus -profiilia, hän näkee, että Ryan menee naimisiin ja paljastaa tämän naisille. Kauhistuneena he pyytävät vapautusta häiden lopettamiseksi, ja heidät päästetään irti, kun he ovat maksaneet aulassa aiheutuneet vahingot. He saapuvat Fort Lauderdalen hotelliin, jossa häät pidetään, mutta on liian myöhäistä lopettaa se. Naiset kohtaavat Ryanin, joka huutaa heitä heittäytymään hänen kimppuunsa. Naiset väittävät edelleen, että oli se väärin, että hän nussi heitä molempia häitä edeltävänä yönä kertomatta heille, että hän oli kihloissa. Ryan myöntää, että hän oli ollut nykyisen vaimonsa Genevieven kanssa yliopiston fuksivuodesta lähtien eikä ole päässyt olemaan kenenkään muun kanssa silleen koko aikana. Kun naiset tapaavat Genevieven, he näkevät tämän pomottavan ja vaativan sexiä vinomunaiselta Ryanilta, ja päättävät olla kertomatta hiänelle hänen teoistaan, koska he tuntevat Ryanin kärsivän yhtä paljon avioliitossaan kuin heidän seurassaan.
    ellauri332.html on line 383: Vaikka ällön Stanley Kubrikin elokuvasovitusta pidetään klassikkona, se ei ole vailla kiistoja. King ei vain vihannut tarinansa kuvaamista näytöllä, vaan työolosuhteet kuvauksissa olivat surullisen ankarat näyttelijöille ja miehistölle. Tämä piti erityisen paikkansa Shelley Duvallin kohdalla, joka on sanonut, että hänen aikansa kuvauksissa oli "melkein sietämätöntä." Jep, niin käy, kun paat näyttelijät esittämään saman panokohtauksen yli 127 kertaa ja vedät käteen samalla!
    ellauri332.html on line 393: Tulirokkoisen (tähän tarkoitettu sanapeli) punaisen mekon käyttäjiä kohtaa kauhistuttava kohtalo. Kuten "Voguen" sivut kertovat, muoti on tuskaa! Elokuvan pelottavin osa on selvittää, mistä mekon kangas on tehty. Sen annamme sinun löytää itse...Elokuvan varsin omituinen juoni ja sadistisesti surrealistiset kohtaukset ovat tehneet siitä polarisoivan elokuvan jopa elokuvasta kiinnostuneimmille.
    ellauri332.html on line 397: Pulloposkinen Leonardo DiCaprio tunnetaan menetelmänäyttelijänä, joka on täysin sitoutunut rooleihinsa jokaisessa elokuvassa, jossa hän on ollut mukana, eikä vuoden 2015 "The Revenant" ollut poikkeus. DiCaprio näytteli Hugh Glassia, kovaa rajamiestä, joka loukkaantui vakavasti karhun hyökkäyksessä ja jonka miehistö hylkäsi selviytyäkseen omillaan erämaassa. Kehittyäkseen hahmoxi täydellisesti DiCaprio päätti pitäytyä puhtaasti raa'an lihan ruokavaliossa (mikä oli erityisen vaikeaa, koska hän oli vegaani) ja nukkua eläinten ruhoissa. Puhumattakaan lähes sietämättömistä jäisistä sääolosuhteista kuvauksen aikana ja lähes loputtomasta eroavien miehistön jäsenten tulvasta, on turvallista sanoa, että veri, hiki ja kyyneleet menivät rooliin, joka lopulta tuotti hänelle Oscar-palkinnon. Oliko se kuitenkaan sen arvoista, leffa oli täysi paskakasa.
    ellauri332.html on line 410: Ellet elänyt kiven alla vuosina 2008–2021, "Twilight"-saaga soittaa sinulle kelloa. Kenelle kellot soivat kelle ei. Lukioon sijoittuva vampyyrin rakkaustarina ei vain rypisti höyheniä sen vuoksi, että se on lajitteleva, vaan myös siksi, että se romantisoi valtavan... ikäeron Bellan ja Edwardin välillä. Höh, melko huolestuttava 87 vuoden ikäero tarkemmin. Mutta Edwardin valtava muna on yhä salamannopea ja hampaat terävinä Bellan niskassa.Tämä oli amerikkalaisittain erityisen huolestuttavaa, koska franchising-ryhmän pääkohdeyleisö koostui huutavista tweensistä, joilla on vielä isän antamat pledgesormuxet. Bella ei kyllä ole mikään missi, tisutkin sillä on kuin kuhmuiset omenat. Voisi sitä silti pikasesti vetästä.
    ellauri332.html on line 484: Wenders himself remains less than happy with the project, and on the commentary track of The American Friend cites it as a contributory factor in his decision to almost abandon filmmaking and return to painting and film criticism.
    ellauri332.html on line 523: "Fantastic Breasts" -sarjaa on kutsuttu "Hollywoodin kirottuimmaksi franchiseksi". Jep! Elokuva seuraa Newt Scamanderia hänen tehtävässään pelastaa ja suojella hassuja olentoja, joita löytyy vain velhomaailmasta. Kuulostaako maagiselta? Ei?
    ellauri332.html on line 546: Megan Fox oli valtava osa kahta ensimmäistä live-action Transformers -elokuvaa, mutta miksi Megan Fox jätti Transformers -sarjan ennen Transformers: Dark of the Moon -elokuvaa ? Steven Spielbergin tuottamana Paramount lanseerasi live-action Transformers -franchise-sarjan vuonna 2007. Ensimmäisen elokuvan ohjasi Michael Bay, ja siinä näytteli Shia LaBeouf Sam Witwickynä, ja Fox toimi hänen näyttelijänä ja rakkausmiehenä Mikaela Banes. Vuoden 2007 elokuva oli taloudellisesti valtava hitti ja ansaitsi yli 700 miljoonaa dollaria maailmanlaajuisesti. Sen jatko-osa, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, menestyi vielä paremmin vuonna 2009, mikä takaa trilogian. Megan Fox Transformers -ongelma jätti kuitenkin tumman pilven franchisingin päälle.
    ellauri332.html on line 568:

  • Is this cheese?

    ellauri332.html on line 591: "Alexander" (2004) oli 3 tunnin elokuva, joka tehtiin yhteen ommeltujen puoliksi leivottujen ideoiden välähdyksistä siinä toivossa että katsojat olisivat innoissaan nähdessään valkaistun blondin Colin Farrellin [muutkin kuin Nora "Genital" Roberz], joka kuvasi Aleksanteri Suurta, ja Angelina Jolien, joka näytteli hänen äitirooliaan suurella näytöllä. Yleisö piti tätä historiallisten epätarkkuuksien ja Colinin hinuroinnin lisäksi yhtenä elokuvan naurettavimmista asioista. "Emme väitä vastustavamme homoja ", sanoi Yannis
    ellauri332.html on line 605: Persialainen historian asiantuntija Kaveh Farrokh kyseenalaisti Persepoliksen polttamatta jättämisen ja huomautti, että elokuvassa "Kreikkalais-amerikkalaiset joukot esitetään tyypillisesti hyvin järjestäytyneinä, kurinalaisina ja niin edelleen, ja mikä on erittäin huolestuttavaa, on se, että ns. Persialaiset esitetään kohtaamassa makedonialaisia, näette heidät turbaanoituina. Turbaanit eivät ole edes persialaisia ​​esineitä [...] Heidän armeijansa ovat täysin järjestäytymättömiä. Ei edes tiedetä, että persialaisilla oli todella univormut. He marssivat kurinalaisena joukko-osastona [sic], ja musiikkia todellakin käytettiin. Ääliöt, Persia oli suurvalta ennen kuin kreikkalaiset edes kexi narusandaalit ja lampaansuolikondomin.
    ellauri332.html on line 609: Tarantino-leffan on lähes mahdotonta paeta kiistoja. No, hänen vuoden 2019 elokuvansa "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" ei ole poikkeus. Elokuva on fantastinen ote todellisista Hollywoodin ikoneista ja traagisista Mansonin perheen murhista. Kriitikoista huolimatta tapa, jolla toimintatähti-ikoni Bruce Lee on kuvattu Tarantinon tarinassa, herätti kiistaa. Shannon Lee, Bruce Leen tytär, on ulkoisesti panostanut elokuvaan sen loukkaavasta kuvasta hänen isänsä. Lisäksi monet ovat puhuneet elokuvasta sen selkeän naisten objektiivisuuden ja heihin kohdistuvan väkivallan kuvauksen vuoksi.
    ellauri332.html on line 625: Ei ole mikään salaisuus, että "Star Wars" -esiosat ovat jakavia, jopa kaikkein sitkeimmille "Star Wars" -faneille. Useimmat ihmiset ovat kuitenkin samaa mieltä siitä, että Jar Jar Binks [n.h.] on ehkä kaikkien aikojen vihatuin elokuvahahmo. Hahmo ei ole vain uskomattoman ärsyttävä, vaan "Star Wars" -fanit näkivät kömpelön hahmon sisällyttämisen sarjaan Disneyn räikeänä yrityksenä markkinoida elokuvaa lapsille. Jar-Jarista tuli tärkein lyöntilauta "Star Wars" -faneille, jotka vihaavat esiosaa päästääkseen esille kritiikkinsä ja pettymyksensä. Kuka tiesi, että niin typerä hahmo voisi melkein tuhota niin voimakkaan franchising-sarjan?
    ellauri332.html on line 636: George Lucas sai inspiraationsa sankarin luomiseen kuuluisalta sarjakuvahahmolta Hessu . Esiintyy elokuvassa Star Wars. Episodi I: The Phantom Menace ", jossa häntä näytteli ja äänesti amerikkalainen näyttelijä Ahmed Best , Binksistä tuli historian ensimmäinen sivuhahmo, joka luotiin yksinomaan liikkeensieppaustekniikalla . Hahmo sai kriitikoilta ja faneilta negatiivista palautetta liian koomisuuden vuoksi, ja siksi tekijöiden oli vähennettävä merkittävästi hahmon osallistumista esiosa-trilogian elokuviin.
    ellauri332.html on line 660: Nyttemmin suosiota on saanut salaliittoteoria että Jar Jar onkin pahis. Sillehän on käymässä kuin venäläisille. Sekin vielä.
    ellauri332.html on line 673: Kun fanit nauttivat tästä lähi-idän eeppisestä tarinasta, he voivat myös arvostaa niitä rikkaita kulttuurisia ja uskonnollisia vaikutteita, jotka tekevät "Star Warsista" todella ainutlaatuisen ja erityisen franchising-sarjan. Olkoon Voima kanssasi ja löytäköön se aina inspiraatiota juutalaisen perinteen viisaudesta.
    ellauri332.html on line 712: Eli takkupartainen E.Saarismainen "muukalainen" Colombo-takki päällä yrittää pelastaa epätoivoisen psykologian professorin itsemurhalta. Kukaan ei tiedä, mistä arvoituksellinen muukalainen tulee, hänen nimestään tai historiastaan. Mutta hän on ex-biljonääri (mitenniin ex?), maailman 3. rikkain kaveri, joka on vaan lakannut ajamasta partaansa. Hän huutaa, että modernit yhteiskunnat ovat tehneet itsestään globaalin saattohoitokeskuksen. Kiehtovalla retoriikalla hän alkaa houkutella seuraajia myydäkseen unelmiaan. Viehättäessään ihmisiä ja vapauttaessaan heidät rutiinin orjuudesta hän saa myös monia vihollisia. Onko hän auktoriteetti vai vain hullu tuntematon, vaiko molempia? Romaani, joka saa sinut nauramaan ja itkemään, mutta ennen kaikkea ajattelemaan pieniä ruusunpunaisia ajatuxia.
    ellauri333.html on line 49: Väärin väärin itäintiaanit! Kalat eivät pane vaan ne kutevat. The kala pani (lit. black water) taboo represents the proscription of traveling overseas in Hinduism. According to this prohibition, crossing the seas to foreign lands causes the loss of one's social respectability, as well as the putrefaction of one’s cultural character and posterity. Merelle ei parane mennä siellä kalat panevat ja skorbioonit pistää sammakoita lääkepiikillä. I am levitating now, mukeltavat mutakuono itäintiaanit tämännimisessä pimeässä Clickflix kauhusarjassa, saastunutta vettä juovat, nikottelevat ja verta sylkevät.
    ellauri333.html on line 60: This last edict, Edict No.13, is particularly important in that it mentions the main Hellenistic kings of the time, as well as their precise geographical location, suggesting that Ashoka had a very good understanding of the Greek of that time.
    ellauri333.html on line 61: Given Ashoka's particularly moral definition of "Dharma" it is possible that he simply wants to say that buddhist virtue and piety now exist from the Mediterranean to the south of India. An expansion of Buddhism to the West is unconfirmed historically. Valehteli raukka nälissään. The edicts put forward moral rules which are extremely short, aphoristic expressions, the subjects being discussed, the vocabulary itself, are all hardly worth an elephant turd. Ashoka used the expression Dhaṃma Lipi (Prakrit in the Brahmi script: 𑀥𑀁𑀫𑀮𑀺𑀧𑀺, "Inscriptions of the Dharma") to describe his own Edicts. According to the edicts, the extent of Buddhist proselytism during this period reached as far as the Mediterranean, and many Buddhist monuments were created.
    ellauri333.html on line 65: The word Mleccha was commonly used for foreign 'barbarians of whatever race or colour' [purification needed]. As a mleccha, any foreigner stood outside the caste system and the ritual ambience. Thus, historically, contact with them was viewed by the Hindu as menstruating and polluting. The Mleccha people were Sakas, Hunas, Yavanas, Kambojas, Pahlavas, Bahlikas and Rishikas. The Kiratas, Khas, Indo-Greeks, Pulindas, Gurjara, Scythians, Kushanas and Arabs were also mlecchas. Blaah, yecch.
    ellauri333.html on line 67: The Sanskrit word occurs as a verb mlecchati for the first time in the latic Vedic text Śathapatha‐Brāhmana dated to around 700 BCE. It is taken to mean "to speak indistinctly or barbarously". Brahmins are prohibited from speaking in this fashion. As mleccha does not have an Indo-European etymology, scholars infer that it must have been a self-designation of a non-Aryan people within India. Based on the geographic references to the Mleccha deśa (Mleccha country) to the west, the term is identified with the Indus people, whose land is known from the Sumerian texts as Meluḫḫa. Asko Parpola has proposed a Dravidian derivation for "Meluḫḫa", as mel-akam ("high country", a possible reference to the Balochistan high lands). Not very likely. Wettenhovi-Aspan nehashkushilta kuulostaa Askon selitys (neekerit haisevat kuselta). Some suggest that the Indo-Aryans used an onomatopoeic sound to imitate the harshness of alien tongue and to indicate incomprehension, thus coming up with "mleccha". Bar, bar! koittaa yhdet sanoa. Mleccha? ihmettelee toiset. Nemetskit seuraa vierestä huuli pyöreänä.
    ellauri333.html on line 73: According to another belief in the pre-modern India, the Kala Pani (sea water) was inhabited by the mowglis, bad spirits and monsters. However, not all Hindus adhered to the proscription, so as to gain monetary wealth. For instance, Hindu merchants were present in Burma, Muscat, and other places around Asia and Africa. The East India Company recruited several upper-case soldiers, and adapted its military practices to the requirements of their religious rituals. Consequently, the overseas service, considered polluting to their caste, was not required of them. The General Service Enlistment Act of 1856 required the new recruits to serve overseas if asked. The serving high-caste sepoys were fearful that this requirement would be eventually extended to them.[12] Thus, the Hindu soldiers viewed the Act as a potential threat to their faith. The resulting discontent was one of the causes of the Indian rebellion of 1857. The Cellular Jail was known as Kala Pani, as the overseas journey to the Andaman islands threatened the convicts with the loss of caste, resulting in social exclusion.
    ellauri333.html on line 75: "And the whole world will be filled with mleccha behavior and notions and ceremonies, and sacrifices will cease and joy will be nowhere and general rejoicing will disappear. And, O Yudhishthira, the whole world will be mlecchified. And men will cease to gratify the gods by offerings of Sraddhas. And no one will listen to the words of others and no one will be regarded as a preceptor by another. And, O ruler of men, intellectual darkness will envelop the whole earth."
    ellauri333.html on line 77: Cellular Jail, the British Indian prison on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, was known as Kala Pani: an incarceration in this jail threatened the convicts with the loss of caste and the resulting social exclusion.
    ellauri333.html on line 79: The Kala Pani theme features prominently in the Indo-Caribbean history, and has been elaborately discussed in the writings of V. S. Naipaul. Ashoka oli proselyytti buddhisti. Ashoka also states that he sent emissaries to the West to transmit medical care and medicinal plants (Major Rock Edict No.2). We do not know what the influence of these emissaries was on the Greek world. Most likely null. Barbaarit varmaan mätki niitä takaraivoon ja vei Ketan kamat.
    ellauri333.html on line 81: These inscriptions proclaim Ashoka's adherence to the Buddhist philosophy. The inscriptions show his efforts to develop the Buddhist dhamma throughout his kingdom. Although Buddhism as well as Gautama Buddha are mentioned, the edicts focus on social and moral precepts rather than specific religious practices or the philosophical dimension of Buddhism. These were located in public places and were meant for people to read.
    ellauri333.html on line 91: From a foot-note 2 we are glad to learn that huge erections have now been put up over this and the other Ashoka inscriptions by the Mysore Government for their protection, and the headman of the village has the keys as custodian. Panini mielestä Asokan titteli Devanampriya 'jumalten suosikki' oli pilkkanimi. Panini himself as a hindoo or other old banana does not mention Devanampriya, but states that the termination of the genitive case is preserved at the end of the first member of compounds if the meaning is abusive.
    ellauri333.html on line 93: Ceylonese sources state that Ashoka succeeded his father Bindusara 314 years after Buddha's Nirvana and that his anointment took place four years after his father's death, or 218 years after the Nirvana. The Burmese tradition confirms the two dates 214 and 218. The traditional date of the Nirvana is 544 B.C. Various devices were proposed in order to account for this chronological error, until Fleet showed that the Buddha-varsha of 544 B. C. is a comparatively modern fabrication, of the twelfth century, and that the difference of about sixty years is the quite natural result of the buddhists bungling it again.
    ellauri333.html on line 95: Secondly, the traditional figures of the Northern Buddhists are almost totally at variance with those of the Southern Buddhists. The historical tradition of India, Ceylon, and Burma is unanimous in naming as the founder of the Maurya dynasty Chandragupta, and as his two immediate successors Bindusara and Asoka.
    ellauri333.html on line 110: Dried figs were so eagerly desired by all men that even Amitrochates, the king of the Indians, wrote to Antiochus asking him, says Hegesander, to purchase and send him sweet wine, dried figs, and a sophist; and that Antiochus wrote back: "We shall send you dried figs and sweet wine; but it is not lawful in Greece to sell a sophist." E. Saarinen on käytännön sofisti ja sykofantti. Se on kyllä ollut kaupan enimmän tarjoovalle.
    ellauri333.html on line 115: Asooka on japsukieltä ja tarkoittaa "aijaa, vai niin?" Ashokan olemassaolo historiallisena keisarina oli melkein unohdettu, mutta brahmi-kirjoituksella kirjoitettujen lähteiden purkamisen jälkeen 1800-luvulla Ashokalla on maine yhtenä suurimmista Intian keisareista. Modernin Intian tasavallan tunnus on muunnelma Ashokan leijonapääkaupungista. Ashokan pyörä, Ashoka Chakra, on otettu Intian kansallislipun keskelle.
    ellauri333.html on line 119: Patna (/ˈpætnə, ˈpʌt-/ Hindi: [ˈpəʈnaː] ⓘ), historically known as Pataliputra, is the capital and largest city of the state of Bihar in India. According to the United Nations, as of 2018, Patna had a population of 2.35 million, making it the 19th largest city in India. Covering 250 square kilometres (97 sq mi) and over 2.5 million people, its urban agglomeration is the 18th largest in India. Patna also serves as the seat of Patna High Court. The Buddhist, Hindu and Jain pilgrimage centres of Vaishali, Rajgir, Nalanda, Bodh Gaya and Pawapuri are nearby and Patna City is a sacred city for Sikhs as the tenth Sikh Guru, Guru Gobind Singh was born here. The modern city of Patna is mainly on the southern bank of the river Ganges. The city also straddles the rivers Sone, Gandak and Punpun. The city is approximately 35 kilometres (22 mi) in length and 16 to 18 kilometres (9.9 to 11.2 mi) wide.
    ellauri333.html on line 130: The king confesses that the Kalinga war was the turningpoint in his religious career, and that his grief at the enormous loss of human life made him repent of his conquest and aspire henceforth to the conquest by moraliity. Before, he had been known as Chandasoka (i. e. the fierce Asoka) on account of his evil deeds; afterwards he became known as Dharmasoka (i.e. the pious Asoka) on account of his virtuous deeds.
    ellauri333.html on line 132: 'The following occurred to me: I shall issue proclamations on morality, shall order instruction in morality. Hearing this, men will conform, will be elevated, and will progress considerably by the promotion of morality.'
    ellauri333.html on line 134: The date of this propaganda is given in the pillar-edict VI, B. In the same year he directed his officers to carry on the propaganda on their quinquennial circuit.
    ellauri333.html on line 135: As a pious Hindu he acknowledged the debt which every king owes to his subjects in return for the revenue levied from them, and which consists in affording them protection.
    ellauri333.html on line 137: For whosoever praises his own sect or blames other sects all out of devotion to his own sect, with the view of glorifying his own sect, — if he is acting thus, he rather injures his own sect very severely {section H). Hence the king recommends to all sects concord {samavSya, section I) and the guarding of speech (vacho-gupti, section D).
    ellauri333.html on line 140: Hyvä Asoka, turvan kiinnipito voittaa 'sananvapauden' 6-0. Moreover, Devanampriya speaks thus : Obedience must be rendered to mother and father, likewise to elders ; compassion must be shown towards animals ; the truth must be spoken: these same moral virtues (dharma-guna) must be practised. In the same way the pupil must show reverence to the master, and one must behave in a suitable manner towards relatives. This is an ancient rule, and this conduces to long life. Thus one must act.
    ellauri333.html on line 143: Meritorious is obedience to mother and father. Liberality to friends, acquaintances, and relatives, to Brahmanas and Sramanas (L e. Buddhist monks) is meritorious. Abstention from killing animals is meritorious. Moderation in expenditure (and) moderation in possessions are meritorious' (III, D).
    ellauri333.html on line 153: Secondly, in the first rock-edict, section B, he directly prohibits the killing of animals at sacrifices. At the end of the same edict, however, he rather naively confesses that he had not yet been able to carry out fully the 1 abstention from killing animals' which formed part of his moral code, and that three animals were still being killed daily in his kitchen; but he promises that even this slaughter would be discontinued in future. Samansuuntaisia hiilijalanjälkilupauxia tekevät kaikki kauppiaat tänä päivänä.
    ellauri333.html on line 156: (G) But now, when this rescript on morality is written, only three animals are being killed (daily) for the sake of curry, (viz.) two peacocks (and) one deer, (but) even this deer not regularly,
    ellauri333.html on line 160: Among Anoka's 'good deeds' the second pillar-edict (E) gives prominence to various benefits conferred on animals. This statement is explained by the fifth pillaredict, which contains a detailed list of animals that were declared inviolable either permanently or on certain days, among them the well-known fast-days. Ei se silti ollut mikään jainalainen, vaan päinvastoin tapatti ahimsajäbiä tuhatmäärin vääräoppisuudesta (kz alempana).
    ellauri333.html on line 162: Noble deeds of morality and the practice of morality consist in this, that compassion, liberality, truthfulness, purity, gentleness, and goodness, will thus be promoted among men ' ; while the pillaredict II (B, C) says : — ' What does morality include ? few sins, many virtuous deeds, compassion, liberality, truthfulness, purity.
    ellauri333.html on line 167: Devanampriya desires towards all beings abstention from hurting, self-control, impartiality in violence. He requests his descendants that they ' should not think that a fresh conquest ought to be made, that if a conquest does please them they should take pleasure in mercy and light punishments, and that they should regard the conquest by morality as the only conquest.' (section X).
    ellauri333.html on line 189:
    Matkaliputta-Tissarri ja Asooka. Yhtä anakronistinen tuherrus kuin Arbatin lapset tv-elokuva! Pohjois-Intian perinne ei mainitse näitä tapahtumia, mikä on johtanut epäilyihin koko kolmannen buddhalaisen neuvoston historiallisuudesta.

    ellauri333.html on line 212:
    Angry Hanuman: This viral image that won Modi’s praise symbolises today’s aggressive, macho India. This may well be the transformation of a genial, well-loved icon into a militant killer. Virzakapi eli Hannumies on hyvin, hyvin vihainen.
    ellauri333.html on line 219: According to Philip Ludendorf, an American Indologist, the theological significance of Hanuman and devotional dedication to him emerged about 1,000 years after the composition of the Ramayana, in the 2nd millennium CE, with the arrival of Islamic rule in the Indian subcontinent. Ludendorf also writes that the skills in Hanuman's resume also seem to derive in part from his windy patrimony, reflecting Vayu's role in both body and cosmos. Vayu is an important deity and is closely associated with Indra, the king of gods. He is mentioned to be born from the breath of Supreme Being Vishvapurusha and also the first one to drink Soma. Soma oli todnäk piriä. Zarathustra joi haumaa, efedriiniä ja opetti sen itäintiaaneille. Ephedra is the origin of the name of the stimulant ephedrine, which the plants contain in significant concentration. It can cause cardiovascular events.
    ellauri333.html on line 227: Bhakti movement saints such as Samarth Ramdas and Narendra Modi have positioned angry Hanuman as a symbol of nationalism and resistance to persecution. The Vaishnava saint Madhvacharya said that whenever Vishnu incarnates on earth, Vayu accompanies him and aids his work of preserving dharma. In the modern era, Hanuman's iconography and temples have been increasingly common. He is viewed as the ideal combination of "strength, heroic initiative and assertive excellence" and "loving, emotional devotion to his personal god Rama", as Shakti and Bhakti. In later literature, he is sometimes portrayed as the patron god of martial arts such as wrestling and acrobatics, as well as activities such as meditation and diligent scholarship. He symbolises the human excellences of inner self-control, faith, and service to a cause, hidden behind the first impressions of a being who looks like a Vanära. Hanuman is considered to be a bachelor and an involuntary celibate.
    ellauri333.html on line 231: He is famously described by Goswami Tulsidas (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsidas) in his devotional hymn named Hanuman Chalisa (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanuman_Chalisa) - "अष्ट सिद्धि नौ निधि के दाता। अस बर दीन्ह जानकी माता॥ ३१ ॥".
    ellauri333.html on line 234: He is viewed as the ideal combination of shakti and bhakti, "strength, heroic initiative and assertive excellence" and "loving, emotional devotion to his personal trainer god Rama".
    ellauri333.html on line 236: The orientalist F. E. Pargiter (1852–1927) theorized that Hanuman was a proto-Dravidian deity. According to this theory, the name "Hanuman" derives from Tamil word for male monkey (ana-mandi), first transformed to "Anumant" – a name which remains in use. "Anumant", according to this hypothesis, was later Sanskritized to "Hanuman" because the ancient Aryans confronted with a popular monkey deity of ancient Dravidians coopted the concept and then Sanskritized it. According to Murray Emeneau, known for his Tamil linguistic studies, this theory does not make sense because the Old Tamil word mandi in Sangam literature can only mean "female monkey", and Hanuman is male. Further, adds Emeneau, the compound ana-mandi makes no semantic sense in Tamil, which has well developed and sophisticated grammar and semantic rules. The "prominent jaw" etymology, according to Emeneau, is therefore plausible.
    ellauri333.html on line 238: The earliest mention of a divine monkey, interpreted by some scholars as the proto-Hanuman, is in hymn 10.86 of the Rigveda, dated to between 1500 and 1200 BCE. The twenty-three verses of the hymn are a metaphorical and riddle-filled legend. It is presented as a dialogue between multiple characters: the god Indra, his wife Indrani and an energetic monkey it refers to as Virzakapi and his wife Kapi. Ngapa kapi kuyu. The hymn opens with Indrani complaining to Indra that some of the soma offerings for Indra have been allocated to the energetic and strong monkey, and the people are forgetting Indra. The king of the gods, Indra, responds by telling his wife that the living being (monkey) that bothers her is to be seen as a friend, and that they should make an effort to coexist peacefully. The hymn closes with all agreeing that they should come together in Indra's house and share the wealth of the offerings.
    ellauri333.html on line 243: In India, it is now openly acknowledged that the state is capitalist. That it is also male may not be openly stated as such, but is getting clearer by the day. And now a new belligerent face of Hanuman, replacing the earlier one of a genial monkey god, erupts through this fissure. According to reports, Karan Acharya, a 29-year-old graphic designer from Kerala now based in Mangaluru, generated this image of an angry Hanuman playfully and for free for his friends. And yes, he was very pleased when he heard that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had appreciated the new-look Hanuman at an election rally in Karnataka earlier this month.
    ellauri333.html on line 245: Created in 2015, the Angry Hanuman is everywhere now – on buses, windscreens, public walls and T-shirts. Acharya clarifies that this angry makeover is aimed at making the humble, ever servile image of a Bhakt appear powerful, not oppressive. But man is still the measure of most things in India and power remains central to a man’s definition. As general belief goes, celibacy in a male will further increase this precious power manifold. So Hanuman, the celibate Bhakt, becomes an ape symbol for the new and aggressive variety of macho in India that is already denying privacy and freedom of speech to women vehemently through fringe groups such as the Bajrang Dal and Ram Sene.
    ellauri333.html on line 248: Hanuman, according to mythology, is the illegitimate son of the wind god Vayu and the apsara Anjana. Vayu was formally married to the daughter of the divine architect Vishwakarma but that did not stop him from bedding other females. He tried to entice a hundred daughters of King Kushnabh and when rejected, cursed them to become hunch-backed crones. He went on to sire another illegitimate son, Bhima, with Kunti, the teenaged princess married to an impotent husband (Pandu) who prayed to the virile Vayu to oblige her with a child. From his volatile macho father, Hanuman inherited the ability to fly, and an enormous appetite that he shared with his step-brother Bhima. Legend has it that the new-born Hanuman was so hungry that he tried to gobble up the sun thinking it was a fruit. He was made to cough out this glowing morsel when Indra shot a thunderbolt and destroyed his chin (Hanu), hence the name Hanuman.
    ellauri333.html on line 250: But despite his gifts of flying and great physical stamina, Hanuman seems to harbour many childhood anxieties and a deep sense of insecurity as a son alienated from his father. He remains celibate and content to follow his band of simian brothers into the forests. It is his mentors Angad, Jamvant and ultimately Ram who restore his self-esteem and awaken him to his real powers. Tulsidas’ Ramcharit Manas portrays Hanuman as a gentle giant who rose to be a reliable, selfless and humble devotee and ally to his lord. He risks life and limb to cross the seas to Sri Lanka to bring Ram news of his wife being held captive there. As the battle rages in Lanka, he helps fetch a magic herb from the Himalayas to save the life of Lakshmana, and curls up with embarrassment when praised. Aggression is thus excised from the image by Tulsidas to focus on a Bhakt’s principled defence of the just cause and during that course, demolishing a predatory beast.
    ellauri333.html on line 252: Tulsidas’ liberal view of a true Bhakt, however, expresses the feudal male view that the state and its laws, as they exist, are rational. So Ram, according to the laws, kills the Dalit Shambook for gobbling tapas (penance) and Bali for daring to take away his (presumed dead) brother’s wife, and exiles Sita, and the Bhakt accepts it. Valmiki’s Sita sees that masculine mores of male kings relate to a specific moral code that forgives Caesar but not his wife. That male power exists and sex equality does not.
    ellauri333.html on line 254: The angry masculinisation of Hanuman is not contesting gender injustice or waging a war against rapists and the abusive kin of women. It is going to be used next year to sell another kind of war. A war that depends on a certain kind of young men you will find all over history, in Bosnia, Rwanda, Cambodia, Nellie, Muzaffarnagar and Kathua, where ethnic and civil wars have been started. Young men who revere the milch cow as Mata, who swear by the honour of their mothers and sisters but will hunt and rape and kill men and women who do not fit their culturally defined familial categories, who for pleasure need an angry avenger, not one who is as Tulsidas said “gyan gun sagar” (a sea of wisdom and goodness).
    ellauri333.html on line 259:
    Advertisement. Before Angry Hanuman, a genial and servile Hanuman prays to his lord Ram. Etelästä karkaa nuoret koirasapinat pohjoiseen, idästä länteen. Varjelen vartija sitä. (Credit: Wikimedia Commons)

    ellauri333.html on line 261: Similar to the Angry Hanuman transformation, in the 1990s, the familiar Ram holding his bow and standing casually next to his happy family became a lone militant warrior, all flying hair and drawn arrow. The Rath Yatra followed, replicating this motif, and as it reached its crescendo, the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya was demolished by a self-proclaimed Vaanar Sena (monkey army) wielding trishuls. In the Angry Hanuman, we may well be seeing a genial, well-loved icon being transformed into a militant killer, a hominid that might have shared a cave with his now enemy for long. Samuel Taylor Coleridge once wrote in a notebook, “The Prince of Darkness is a Gentleman.” The first fratricidal weapon, as the Bible scholar Bruce Chatwin reminds us, was seen around 10,000 BC, when Citizen Kane the farmer brother crushed a hoe through his brother hunter-gatherer Li'l Abner’s skull.
    ellauri333.html on line 263: Bruce Chatwin was unhappy at Sotheby's. Both women and men found Chatwin attractive, and Peter Wilson, then chairman of Sotheby's, used this appeal to the auction house's advantage when using Chatwin to try to persuade wealthy individuals to sell their art collections. Chatwin became increasingly uncomfortable with the situation. Chatwin frequently came down with colds. He also developed skin lesions that may have been symptoms of Kaposi's sarcoma. Chatwin's case was unusual as he had a fungal infection. He eventually decided to become an Orthodox Christian. But that is another story, so ---
    ellauri333.html on line 315: Herulit katosivat historiasta langobardien valloituxen aikoihin. Geticassa Jordanes kirjoittaa, että herulit väittivät olevansa Scandzan pisin kansa. Jordanes kirjoittaa edelleen, että kaikki Scandzan kansat "ylittävät saksalaiset kooltaan ja hengeltään". Sidonius Apollinaris kirjoitti, että herulilla oli siniharmaat silmät. Procopius ei pitänyt heruleista:
    ellauri333.html on line 330: Most communities in India have historically followed a patrilineal system of family wherein surname, property and birth lineage is traced along the male line.
    ellauri333.html on line 338: Owing to the fact that there was a robust anti-caste campaign in south India, many communities collectively decided to renounce caste-based surnames. However, this is not quite the case with northern Indian communities. In fact, for a very long time, many south Indian communities did not even have a designated surname and instead added an initial against their given names, for example, R. Madhavi indicating Ranganathan Madhavi, wherein Madhavi would be the given name. Like Mohannon.
    ellauri333.html on line 346: Since in most cultures in India, surnames are derived from the male line, often women are by default expected to take up and even forgo their surnames in the event of their marriage. This kind of rigid kinship pattern clearly highlights the inequality of women’s social status, leading to the complete diminishing of their identity.
    ellauri333.html on line 352: Dalit (hindiksi दलित, "tallattu") on hindujen kastilaitoksessa perinteisesti kastittomiksi kutsuttujen itsestään käyttämä nimitys. Hindulaisuudessa ihmiset jaetaan kasteihin, ja ilman kastia jääneiden dalitien asema on ollut perinteisesti kaikkein huonoin. Vaikka Intian laki kieltää nykyisin syntyperään perustuvan syrjinnän, dalitien sorto on Intiassa arkipäivää. Intian lisäksi daliteja löytyy myös Nepalista, Bangladeshista ja Pakistanista. Daliteja on nykyisin noin 200 miljoonaa.
    ellauri333.html on line 366: His thesis was on "The problem of the rupee: Its origin and its solution". He worked as a private tutor, as an accountant, and established an investment consulting business, but it failed when his clients learned that he was an untouchable. In 1918, he became professor of political economy in the Sydenham College of Commerce and Economics in Mumbai. Although he was successful with the students, other professors objected to his sharing a drinking-water jug with them.
    ellauri333.html on line 374: Ambedkar published his book Annihilation of Caste on 15 May 1936. It strongly criticised Hindu orthodox religious leaders and the caste system in general, and included "a rebuke of Gandhi on the subject. Later, in a 1955 BBC interview, he accused Gandhi of writing in opposition of the caste system in English language papers while writing in support of it in Gujarati language papers. In his writings, Ambedkar also accused Jawaharlal Nehru of being "conscious of the fact that he is a Brahmin".
    ellauri333.html on line 383: Protestina hindulaisuutta vastaan Ambedkar kääntyi buddhalaisuuteen 14. lokakuuta 1956 just weeks before his death.
    ellauri333.html on line 388: He advocated birth control to develop the Indian economy, and this has been adopted by Indian government as national policy for family planning. He emphasised equal rights for women for economic development.
    ellauri333.html on line 398: Ambedkar's legacy was not without criticism. Ambedkar has been criticised (by a skinny pedophile who shall remain nameless) for his one-sided views on the issue of caste at the expense of cooperation with the larger nationalist movement.
    ellauri333.html on line 445: Vuoden 1994 arvion mukaan Punjabi-sikhit ja hindut muodostivat 10-15 % Intian armeijan kaikista riveistä. Intian ilmavoimien historian korkein kenraali on Punjabi-sikhi, ilmavoimien marsalkka Arjan Singh.
    ellauri333.html on line 460: Sikhien kuningaskunnan kaaduttua he alkoivat tehdä läheistä yhteistyötä brittien kanssa, jotka puolestaan värväsivät sikhejä armeijaan ja poliisivoimiin. 1800-luvun loppupuolella syntyi Singh Sabhā -liike, joka pyrki levittämään tietoa oikeaksi näkemästään sikhiläisyydestä ja sen historiasta käyttäen hyväkseen lehdistöä. Liike myös vakuutti britit siitä, että sikhejä tuli kohdella omana poliittisena yhteisönään Intiassa. Ajatus itsenäisestä sikhivaltiosta nousi jälleen, kun Punjabin jakamisesta Pakistanin ja Intian välillä alettiin neuvotella ennen vuotta 1947, jolloin maat itsenäistyivät. Sikhien pieni osuus alueen väestöstä teki kuitenkin suunnitelman mahdottomaksi. Itsenäisessä Intiassa on vaikuttanut sikhien Akālī Dal -puolue, jonka vaikutuksesta perustettiin Intian Punjabin osavaltio, jonka nykyisten rajojen sisällä sikhit ovat enemmistö. Sikhien suhteet keskushallinnon kanssa eivät ole aina olleet hyvät. Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindārnwalen (1947–84) perustama Khālistān-liike ajaa itsenäistä sikhivaltiota ja tämä on johtanut yhteenottoihin keskushallinnon kanssa. Vaikka suurin osa sikheisä asuu edelleen Punjabin alueella, heistä arviolta 10 % on muuttanut muualle maailmaan.
    ellauri333.html on line 544: Daniel Defoe ja Iris taittaa peistä siitä onko kaikki determinististä vai joku valintamyymälä. Is this cheese? Täysin yhdentekevää. Aikamatkustajat eivät problematisoi sitä miten käy jos menee muuttamaan juuri tätä historiaa. Eihän se sitten enää ole tää. Vähän sama ongelma kuin sielunvaelluxessa: jos musta tulee joku muu elukka niin en ole enää mä, ja miten käy pikkuveitikan? Enhän nytkään muista mikä olin ennen tätä rundia. Vitun turhanpäivästä. Mixei voi vaan uskoa ettei tästä tule tämän kummempaa? Kohta pölistään Hietaniemessä tuhkaläjänä. Loppuu tämä pölinä.
    ellauri334.html on line 113: Uncharted ei kuitenkaan ole huono elokuva (sitä ei saa mainoxessa sanoa), mutta se on niin mitäänsanomaton sellainen, että siitä on hyvin vaikea keksiä mitään hyvää sanottavaa. Muttei auta, on vaan työnnettävä, maxoivat runsaasti maxalaatikkoa. Sankarit ovat puisevia ja pahiskaarti Banderas ja Täti Gabrielle ovat unohdettavia. Hahmoihin on miltei mahdoton kiintyä. Yhdestäkään taistelusta tai takaa-ajosta on vaikea innostua. Ukrainan sotakin on jännempi.
    ellauri334.html on line 213: 32-vuotias odottaa suuria suunnitelmia ja väittää, että ne tekevät jo historiaa ja ovat "tulevaisuuden ja kehittyvien teknologioiden näkemyksemme kuljettaja, jota muut maat voivat myöhemmin käyttää".
    ellauri334.html on line 222: Yhdessä lähihistorian räikeimmästä hallituksen ministerin erokirjeestä entinen sisäministeri väitti, että pääministeri oli välttynyt "kovilta päätöksiltä" "laivojen pysäyttämiseksi".
    ellauri334.html on line 245: Juudaksen myöhemmästä historiasta levisi erilaisia ​​legendoja. Matta. xxvii. 3 ja sitä seuraavat kertoo, että nähdessään, että Jeesus tuomittiin, hän katui tekoaan ja otti takaisin kolmekymmentä hopearahaa, jotka hän oli saanut papilta ja vanhimmilta, ja heitti rahat temppelin aarrekammioon kutsuen sitä viattoman veren hinnaksi, ja sitten meni pois ja hirtti itsensä Ahitofelin tavoin (II Sam. xvii. 23); mutta papit eivät käyttäisi rahoja temppelitarkoituksiin, koska se oli verirahaa (koost. 5. Moos. xxiii. 18); siksi he päättivät ostaa niillä savenvalajan pellon muukalaisten hautaamiseksi; tästä johtuu sen nimi, "Ḥaḳal Dama" (= Verikenttä).
    ellauri334.html on line 260: Irrelevant to me. He may have been an asshole, or he may have been a patriot. He may have existed, or his character may be an allegory. If we look at it from a Christian point of view: Christianity as it is known would not exist without him. Not that I really care much about that as a Jew.
    ellauri334.html on line 266: As Tom Isaacs already mentioned, Bart Ehrman has suggested that perhaps what Judas betrayed was not where Jesus was (why would they need him for that?), but rather what Jesus was saying about himself. To flesh this out just a little:
    ellauri334.html on line 267: In the synoptic gospels, which are considered more historically reliable than the very theological gJohn, and especially the first, Mark, Jesus's public ministry is largely focused on his apocalyptic message, with a bit of faith healing and exorcism thrown in for good measure. His remarks about himself, and the notion that he was the messiah, was perhaps something… (more)
    ellauri334.html on line 269: Was this worth your time? Absolutely not.
    ellauri334.html on line 279: This Jewish sounding name is used by anti-Jewish theologians to vilify Israel. They realized the Jews as a group could not be convinced to betray God by following what Jews considered to be a false prophet as well as the pagan elements of Christianity. Romans, who were not monotheist, could buy contrast, be missionized to accept new Christian beliefs.
    ellauri334.html on line 285: He is in heaven. In the “correct” heaven - the Kingdom of God. Why? Read the 650 pages he authored through a divine love medium about 17 years ago and see for yourself what sort of advanced spirit he is today. Knowledgeable, loving, and able to tell a great deal about Jesus’ life 2000 years ago. And yes he spent some time in the hells. But God always forgives us, save only for the “unforgivable sin” which since it is an act of omission by the human, God can do nothing about. It is not in his power. He is omnipotent mut not that potent. It's like with that stone.
    ellauri334.html on line 298: And in the gospel of Judas, non canonical of course, are two words you won’t find in the canonical or apocryphal Bibles “Jesus laughed.” I may be alone, but I like to picture Jesus laughing on the cross. And his fellow felon whistling a merry tune. All three hanging singing in unison. I’m sure He needs to from time to time.
    ellauri334.html on line 327: Second, one of the other apostles was also named “Judas”. To differentiate the 2, “Judas Iscariot” was because his father was called “Iscariot”. Why? It is understood that they were from the Judean town of Kerioth-hezon. The other “Judas” was referred to as “son of James”. He was also known as Thaddaeus. The name was changed because nobody liked to be called Jew anymore.
    ellauri334.html on line 332: I don't know that religious Jews have a particular take on Judas. I personally prefer his Gospel over the others. Jesus laughing and being child like seems more honest. The seriousness of Jesus is a production of the church.
    ellauri334.html on line 333: I cannot say I know a whole lot about Judas Iscariot besides the general story about him betraying Jesus to the Roman authorities, but one thing I MUST say - Judaism has NOTHING to do with Judas Iscariot. I had more than one person ask me “Why do you guys follow Judas?? Surely he was a bad person!”. This would be funny but when I think about how many Jews were actually killed or oppressed because of things like this - it’s not funny at all.
    ellauri334.html on line 338: Anyway….I have never been able to figure how it’s anyone’s responsibility for what happened to Jesus, other than G-d himself….This was his plan…..and he put it into action…How come he is never blamed….I blame him…
    ellauri334.html on line 357: Why did Judas have to identify Jesus to his captors whereas they know him?
    ellauri334.html on line 386: Tähän mennessä suurimmassa Palestiinaa kannattavassa marssissa sadat tuhannet ihmiset kulkivat Marble Archista Yhdysvaltain suurlähetystöön Nine Elmsissä.
    ellauri335.html on line 195: Moni jättää kalliimmat vihannekset ja hedelmät ostamatta tai ostaa niitä alennettuun hintaan ja korvaa muilla sesongissa olevilla tuotteilla, esim nahistuneella kaalilla.
    ellauri335.html on line 265: Jotka ahistavat vähäryssiä och mask i fågelnäbben lagt?
    ellauri335.html on line 372: Huhuu! Suihinotto seittemännen kerroksen parvekkeella. Ilmari puhisi hiljaa Mirkan pyllyvälistä. On... On tää hienoa...
    ellauri335.html on line 378: Oonko? Siis niin kuin tosi paras? Mirkka kysyi kullintäyteisellä äänellä. Mä siis oon parempi kun Mielikki?» Sä oot ykkönen jos Mielikkiä ei lasketa, ähisi Ilmari. Mielikki on vajaahampainen ja sillä on tummelia huulissa. Itäkeskuxen apteekissa oli kaupan Mielikki nimistä kurkkuhunajaa, Ilmarilta lypsettyä. Ilmari on nyrkillätapettava pikku mulkku.
    ellauri335.html on line 501: Pöh. Koko amnestian käsite on vastoin Halakhaa. Älä unohda, älä anna anteexi, se on Jehovan sanoma valitulle kansalle. Svaani ei unohda. Svanetia tai Svanetia (muinaisissa lähteissä Suania; georgiaksi: სვანეთი Svaneti) on historiallinen maakunta Georgian luoteisosassa. Siellä asuu svaanit, georgialaisten entinen alaryhmä. Ei siis Hans Uszkoreitin lasten äidin ja äxpuolison saati Anni Svaanin sukulaisia. He ovat georgialaisia ​​ortodoksisia kristittyjä, ja heidät kristillistettiin 4.-6. vuosisadalla. Joitakin vanhan pakanuuden jäänteitä on kuitenkin säilytetty. Georgian suojeluspyhimys Saint George (paikallisille tunnetaan nimellä Jgëræg) on ​​arvostetuin pyhimys. Kaxikielisiä kuin suomenruåzalaiset, puhuvat svaania ja gruusiaa.
    ellauri336.html on line 47: Suurin osa heidän ponnisteluistaan ​​kohdistuu lasten rankaisemiseen käyttämällä yleisesti käytettyjä vihan, huutamisen, moitteen ja mussarin menetelmiä puolustaakseen itseään. Lisäksi vanhemmat kertovat jatkuvasti lapsilleen, mitä he tekevät väärin, esimerkiksi eivät istu ja syö säännöllisesti pöydässä tai käyttäytyvät väärin. Tämä lähestymistapa EI ole oikea chinuch, kuten Rav Shlomo Wolbe kirjoittaa: "Kuinka typeriä ovat vanhemmat, joiden ajatukset ja ajatukset chinuchista rajoittuvat kysymykseen "Milloin meidän pitäisi lyödä lastamme?" Voi sellaista chinuchia!" (Alei Shur, osa 2, s. 219).
    ellauri336.html on line 61: Ultraortodoksisilla hasidijuutalaisilla on ainutlaatuisia tapoja käyttää hiuksiaan. Heidän ulkonäkönsä saattaa tuntua epätavalliselta ulkopuoliselle. Tämä sivu selittää nämä hartaat perinteet. Ensin se selittää naisista ja sitten miehistä.
    ellauri336.html on line 136: Lisäksi huutavat vanhemmat kasvattavat huutavia lapsia, koska he yksinkertaisesti matkivat vanhempiensa käyttäytymistä itsepuolustukseksi. Se on kuin allerginen reaktio lääkkeelle (samankaltaisuus löytyy Shulchan Aruchista, jossa sanotaan, että vanhemmat eivät saa lyödä vanhempaa lasta, koska tämä voi lyödä häntä vastaan).
    ellauri336.html on line 305: The parts of the body that are considered ervah (private because they are potentially sexually-attractive) are alluded to in Shir HaShirim (Song of Songs). This includes the hair as perverse 4:1, “You are beautiful, my love, you are beautiful. Your eyes are like doves, your hair inside your kerchief is like a flock of goats that stream down from Mount Gilead” (Brachos 24a). Of course, the details of different types of ervah differ. For example, a woman’s singing voice is considered private in halacha but not her speaking voice. Similarly, uncovered hair is considered private for a married woman but not for a single woman. (It’s also not retroactive; married women don’t have to hide photos of themselves from before they were married.)
    ellauri336.html on line 308: Ohn ben Peles was saved from being part of Korach’s rebellion by his wife. When Korach’s men came to fetch Ohn, she sat the entrance to their tent with her hair uncovered, causing the messengers to turn around and walk away (Sanhedrin 109b-110a);
    ellauri336.html on line 310: The Rabbis asked Kimchis what she had done to merit having seven sons serve as Kohein Gadol (High Priest). She responded that the beams of her house never saw her with her hair uncovered. While the Rabbis rejected her hypothesis (because many other women have acted likewise), the extent to which she observed this law is still presented as an example of meritorious behavior (Yoma 47a; see Yerushalmi Megilla 1:10 for the accepted opinion as to the merit of Kimchis);
    ellauri336.html on line 316: According to some Hasidic authorities, the only way to ensure that a woman’s hair doesn’t eventually stray from under her hat/turban/scarf/kerchief/wig/etc. is not to have any. There’s also a concern that hair might create an interposition when using the mikva. Ostensibly, this practice is based upon a statement in the Zohar (parshas Naso) to the effect that the mikva should not see a woman’s hair.
    ellauri336.html on line 318: The fact that there may be such a source is hardly a “slam-dunk” in favor of head-shaving for a variety of reasons. The Talmud in several places either implies or states explicitly that the practice of women is not to shave their heads. For example, Eiruvin 100b says that one of the “curses of Eve” is that women grow their hair long, while Nazir 28b says that a man can cancel his wife’s vow to shave her head if he finds it unattractive. Furthermore, the Shulchan Aruch expressly prohibits women from shaving their heads (YD 182:5). The Zohar, while important, is not a halachic work so ruling from when it contradicts the Talmud or works of halacha is not a simple thing, and Hasidic communities act differently in such a situation than non-Hasidic communities. So this matter goes beyond merely acting leniently vs. acting stringently. (There are also those authorities who say that that’s not even what that Zohar means.)
    ellauri336.html on line 320: This is not even the practice of all Hasidic communities. There are some Hasidic sects where the leadership may consider it obligatory for their adherents, others where it may be an optional practice, and still others where it may be virtually unheard of.
    ellauri336.html on line 322: So is head-shaving a thing? Yes, but chiefly among women who belong to communities that follow that understanding of the Zohar in this matter. The majority of Orthodox women do not shave their heads. Rather, they cover their hair in a variety of ways and to a variety of degrees.
    ellauri336.html on line 330: This article was sponsored by Exhilaread, a thrilling journey to literacy.
    ellauri336.html on line 331: If you found this content meaningful and want to help further our mission through our Keter, Makom, and Tikun branches, please consider becoming a Money (or Small Change) Maker today.
    ellauri336.html on line 336: If Kimchis had 7 sons who each became a Kohen Gadol, does that mean she had 6 sons die in her lifetime? Or is there some way where each one became impure and another son had to take over as Kohen Gadol temporarily?
    ellauri336.html on line 345: The Zohar (parshas Naso) that Rabbi Jack cites doesn’t say anything about mikvah. What it says is that the beams of a woman’s house should not see her hair. This is the meritorious practice observed by Kimchis (and many other women of her time) mentioned in the Talmud. Kimchi IS delicious BTW.
    ellauri336.html on line 346: This stringency is actually one of the strongest proofs that the Talmud and Zohar agree that a woman (even the most righteous woman) DOES have hair. If she doesn’t have any, what is she hiding from her beams? The Zohar that Rabbi Jack wants is in parshas Acharei Mos. That one talks about shaving and mikvah, but not about the mikvah ‘seeing’ anything.
    ellauri336.html on line 362: It is definitely not from the Torah. This is not Jewish law. It’s a custom that came later. There’s a debate as to why.
    ellauri336.html on line 366: Just came across this post. My mother, Nechama bat Nissan, of blessed memory told me that the reason women from Eastern Europe shaved their heads was that during the pogroms the Russian soldiers would crash a Jewish wedding; kidnap the bride, and rape her. The woman would shave her head to be unattractive to the Russian beast. But did it really work? Nowadays everyone seems to be shaving between their legs, has that ever cooled anybody's boner down?
    ellauri336.html on line 368: The other point I’d like to make is that a woman’s hair is cited (somewhere,) as her crown. After she is married, the beauty of her hair is only available for her husband to see. This helps makes her seductive to him. I also have to say that I can’t imagine having an intimate relationship with a woman with a shaved head as I have referenced in the previous paragraph.
    ellauri336.html on line 372: From what I’ve heard, this practice started in Europe generations ago, where Jewish women were targeted.(attacked/kidnapped) By having their head shaved under their head covering it made them less attractive for potential attackers. I’m not sure of the source of this information, though most of my father’s family, shave their heads.
    ellauri336.html on line 408: Its a control thing. Just like many extreme religions, women basically are property to their husbands. This is also part of the mind washing of their new reality of being a wife/mother because now that is all they are on earth for.
    ellauri336.html on line 413: mind shaving as this is there understanding of Jewish law. In places where there is coercion around shaving, that’s definitely a problem. Men have plenty of stringent commandments as well in the most insular circles.
    ellauri336.html on line 417: I completely disagree. I CHOSE to “up my observance level game” all on my very own. I dress more modestly and never leave the house with my hair uncovered. My husband and kids are supportive of my “modern orthodox” observance level even though they do not share it. No one, but NO ONE forced this on me…I don’t shave my head but I would if I had the guts to. I just find my hair annoying.. 🙂
    ellauri336.html on line 425: I addressed this challenging prayer here https://jewinthecity.com/2018/11/how-i-deal-with-thank-you-for-not-making-me-a-woman-shelo-asani-isha-blessing/
    ellauri336.html on line 439: Rabbi Jack Abramowitz, Jew in the City's Educational Correspondent, is the editor of OU Torah (www.ou.org/torah) . He is the author of six books including The Taryag Companion and The G-d Book. For more Q&A, follow his new video series, Ask Rabbi Jack, on YouTube.
    ellauri336.html on line 445: Is This Hamas War the War of Gog and Magog?
    ellauri336.html on line 507: Why did Kimchis have seven sons who were kohen gadol? Or, why is popa 20 blatt behind. In any event, it isn’t because she covered her hair, as the gemara says ???? ??? ?? ??? ???? ????. Yes, but as those of us 20 behind in the daf know, and as was pointed out in that thread, the 2nd and 3rd became kohen gadol when the first was tamei.
    ellauri336.html on line 511: So if someone has several sons and they all become K”G, would that not mean that either at least some or most of them died in her lifetime, or they became tamei while serving as K”G? How could either of those scenarios be considered a sachar for her tznius? Not trying to be disrespectful – I am having real difficulty understanding the positive aspect of this quote in the Gemarah, when obviously something not so good had to have occurred in order for Kimchis to have so many sons who served in that capacity within her lifetime.
    ellauri336.html on line 513: They didnt die. The gemara relates that twice on yom kippur (2 different years) the kohen gadol (her son) had to leave the beis hamikdash, and in the process became tamei requiring his brother to take over. That would account for at least three of her sons serving as kohen gadol with none dead. The story the gemara relates as to how the KG became tamei is not a negative either. The spittle of a non jew landed on him.
    ellauri336.html on line 515: I personally always thought that while she did it from her innate midah of tznius, others “macht nuch”. What he appears to be saying is that hashem knows the reason why people are rewarded a certain way even if their actions are not necessarily different that others around them (the chachamim told her, others do the same and did not merit this).
    ellauri336.html on line 522: Or, why is popa 20 blatt behind. Is it because you followed the Vilna Shas? You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
    ellauri336.html on line 553: Jos lapset sekaantuvat goyimiin huonossa seurassa, vanhempien on tahdikkaasti kerrottava lapselle: "Vanhempanasi ymmärrän, että tämä lapsi ei vaikuta sinuun hyvällä tavalla." Mustahampaiset yrjöt ja talonmiehen pennut ulos talosta. Toora kertoo, että Saara toimi tällä tavalla, kun hän näki puoliarabi Yishmaelin käyttäytyvän sopimattomasti Jitzchakin läsnäollessa (Bereishis 21:9). Vaikka vanhempi ei saa puhua haitallisesti lapsen ystävistä, lapselle tulee tehdä selväksi, että vaikka "täytyy olla hyvä kaikille, ei tarvitse olla hyvä kaikkien kanssa". Tämä koskee eritoten tyttöjä.
    ellauri336.html on line 596: This is her first and only mention of the Israel-Hamas conflict on her account on X (the social media website once known as Twitter), which has a whopping 5.6 million followers, since the despicable Hamas attacks on Oct. 7 that killed 1,400 Israelis, injured thousands more, and took 200 hostages. As of this writing, Thunberg has no posts that mention the conflict on her Facebook page and only one post on her Instagram account that has essentially the same message as her X post.
    ellauri336.html on line 604: That’s the first thing that makes Thunberg’s statement so disgusting. It’s truly mind-boggling that an internationally famous figure could comment on this conflict, which was escalated to its current fever pitch by Hamas’s brutal terrorist attack, without even mentioning that attack or offering any support to its victims.
    ellauri336.html on line 624: The scale of new production is “staggering”, according to an analysis by Global Witness, a campaign group, with Texas leading the way as US output of oil and gas is forecast to rise by 25% over the next decade. This makes it a “looming carbon timebomb”, the group believes, in a period when global oil and gas production needs to drop by 40% to mitigate the worst impacts of the climate crisis.
    ellauri336.html on line 625: “The sheer scale of this new production dwarfs that of every other country in the world and would spell disaster for the world’s ambitions to curb climate change,” the report states.
    ellauri336.html on line 628: Despite the oil price crash of 2014, the Permian’s oil production has soared from about a million barrels a day in 2011 to about 4.5m this autumn, while natural gas production has trebled since 2013, according to US government figures.
    ellauri336.html on line 685: Quincauan minun pite murectiman Sielusani? ia minua adhistettaman minun Sydhemesseni iocapeiue?
    ellauri338.html on line 46: Schelling was a senior staff member of the RAND Corporation (1958–59), where his analysis of the nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union led to his publication of The Strategy of Conflict (1960).
    ellauri338.html on line 48: Schelling’s idea of limited or graduated reprisals—which he later set out in Arms and Influence (1966)—was adopted by the United States in 1965 as Operation Rolling Thunder, which involved the bombing of selected targets in North Vietnam in the expectation that it would deter the North Vietnamese from continuing the war. When this failed to deter North Vietnam, the bombing campaign was escalated, in spite of Schelling’s advice that the bombing should be abandoned if it did not succeed in the first three weeks.
    ellauri338.html on line 50: Among his insights were the efficacy of voluntarily limiting one’s options in order to make the remaining ones more credible, that uncertain retaliation can be a greater deterrent than certain retaliation, and that the ability to retaliate is more of a deterrent than the ability to resist an attack. I.e., a country’s best defense against nuclear war is the protection of its weapons rather than its people. Si vis pacem para bellum. Who needs so many people anyway?
    ellauri338.html on line 52: Schelling was elected president in 1991, and, in his presidential address “Some Economics of Global Warming” (1992), he advanced an argument in favour of a large carbon footprint as a deterrent for those with a smaller one. Talk softly but carry a big parabellum.
    ellauri338.html on line 87: Martinin kartat senenempää kuin Wikipedian virallinen juutalaisten historia eivät mainize Abrahamin maahanmuuttoa Irakista eikä Ebyktista palanneen Moosexen ynnä Joosuan demilitarisaatiota Mooabin, Ammonin ja Filistean mailla. Cetera iam fabulosa ilmeisesti.
    ellauri338.html on line 91: Raamatun mukaan israelilaiset ovat Jaakobin jälkeläisiä, joka myöhemmin nimettiin Israeliksi. Kanaanin ankaran kuivuuden jälkeen Jaakob ja hänen kaksitoista poikaansa pakenivat Egyptiin, missä he lopulta muodostivat Israelin kaksitoista heimoa. Israelilaiset karkasivat myöhemmin pois Egyptin orjuudesta ja vielä myöhemmin Mooses toi heidät takaisin Kanaaniin; he lopulta valloittivat Kanaanin Joosuan johdolla. Useimmat nykyajan tutkijat ovat yhtä mieltä siitä, että Toora ei anna autenttista selvitystä israelilaisten alkuperästä, vaan pitävät sitä heidän kansallisen myyttinsä meeminä. Yleisesti oletetaan kuitenkin, että kertomuksella voi olla "historiallinen ydin". Kenties veljensä sopan syönyt Jaakko oikeasti voitti enkelin pystypainissa kiivettyään tikapuita pitkin taivaaseen.
    ellauri338.html on line 94: Juutalaiset olivat peräisin historiallisen Israelin ja Juudan israelilaisista ja heprealaisista, kahdesta toisiinsa liittyvästä valtakunnasta, jotka syntyivät Levantissa rautakaudella. Vaikka varhaisin maininta Israelista on kaiverrettu Merneptah Steleen noin 1213–1203 eaa., heppulien oma uskonnollinen kirjallisuus kertoo tarinan israelilaisista, jotka ulottuvat ainakin n. 1500 eaa. Israelin kuningaskunta lankesi uusassyrialaiselle valtakunnalle noin vuonna 720 eaa ja Juudan kuningaskunta uusbabylonialaiselle valtakunnalle vuonna 586 eaa. Osa Juudean väestöstä karkotettiin Babyloniin. Assyrialaisten ja babylonialaisten vankeuksien katsotaan edustavan juutalaisen diasporan alkua. Entäs Ebykti? Punaisen meren kuivatus?
    ellauri338.html on line 107: Francesca Stavrakopoulou toteaa, että vaikka kirjoitus viittaa "Daavidin taloon", se ei todista Daavidin historiallisuudesta eikä 9. vuosisadalla eaa. peräisin olevan juutalaisten valtakunnan olemassaolosta. Tarvitaan lisäselvitystä. Garfunkel väittää, että yhdistettynä Khirbet Qeiyafasta löydettyjen arkeologisten todisteiden kanssa kirjoituksen viittaus "Daavidin huoneen kuninkaaseen" on ensisijainen todiste siitä, että David oli historiallinen henkilö ja keskitetyn rajalle roudatun raudan perustaja.
    ellauri338.html on line 157: history%E2%80%93related_articles">Lähteitä
    ellauri338.html on line 166:
    ellauri338.html on line 195: George Bush vanhemman Kiovassa 1. elokuuta 1991 pitämä puhe , jossa hän kehotti ukrainalaisia pysymään osana Neuvostoliittoa, jäi historiaan nimellä " Chicken Kyiv " ("kotletti Kiovassa"), koska v. Englannin sanalla " kana " on transitiivinen merkitys "pelkuri".
    ellauri338.html on line 208: Kansainvälisten suhteiden ja ruoanlaiton historian asiantuntija, suurin venäläisen ruoanlaiton asiantuntija Pokhlebkin saavutti suurimman osan mainetta - tieteellisen ruoanlaittotyönsä ansiosta - ruoanlaiton tutkijana ja popularisoijana, joka työskenteli gastronomisen historian, keittiön semiotiikan ja kulinaarisen antropologian parissa. Hän ehdotti myös kosmonauttien ruokavalion monipuolistamista, mustan leivän ja vihreän teen sekoitusta heille. Pokhlebkinin monografia "Vodkan historia" palkittiin Lange Ceretto -palkinnolla.
    ellauri338.html on line 212: Pohjois-Euroopan historian geopoliittiset näkökohdat heijastuivat hienosti hänen kirjassaan "Suomi vihollisena ja ystävänä". Paraikaa kerätään ainexia kirjaan jatko-osiin.
    ellauri338.html on line 227:
    Vodkan historia

    ellauri338.html on line 229: Vuonna 1991 julkaistiin monografia "Vodkan historia", jossa Pokhlebkin yritti selvittää "milloin vodkan tuotanto aloitettiin Venäjällä ja aloitettiinko se aikaisemmin vai myöhemmin kuin muissa maissa". Syy monografian kirjoittamiseen oli Pokhlebkinin itsensä mukaan kansainvälinen kiista 1970-luvun lopulla vodkan valmistuksesta, kun kirjan kirjoittajan mukaan "useita neuvostovodkamerkkejä joutui boikotin kohteeksi ulkomaisilla markkinoilla”. Länsieurooppalaiset ja amerikkalaiset yritykset, joiden vodkan tuotanto alkoi aikaisemmin kuin Neuvostoliitossa (vuosina 1918-1921, kun taas Neuvostoliitossa 1924), kyseenalaistivat Soyuzplodoimportin oikeuden myydä ja mainostaa tuotettaan vodkana. Neuvostoliittoa pyydettiin etsimään eri nimi vodkamerkeilleen (kuten Stolichnaya , Posolskaya, Pshenichnaya, Sibirskaya, Kubanskaya, Yubileynaya, esimerkiksi "alkoholijuoma".
    ellauri339.html on line 32: It looks like we don't have any episode list for this title yet. Be the first to contribute.
    ellauri339.html on line 48: Kammerer saa tehtävän: löytää ja ottaa valvontaan edistynyt Lev Abalkin, joka vapaaehtoisesti lähti Sarakshista, jossa hän työskenteli, soluttautuen Saari-imperiumin vastatiedusteluihin. Sarakshin raportin mukaan Abalkin pakeni ollessaan hermoromahduksen partaalla ystävänsä ja valvova lääkäri Tristanin kuoltua. Abalkinin itsensä mukaan Imperiumin vastatiedustelu tappoi Tristanin. Yrittäessään pelastaa ruumiinsa Abalkin joutui paljastamaan itsensä ja pakenemaan Saari-imperiumia. Leo on selvästi maan päällä, mutta ei rekisteröitynyt saapuessaan.
    ellauri339.html on line 53:

    Chichén Itzá on kuuluisin ja parhaiten kunnostettu esikolumbiaaninen arkeologinen alue ja historiallinen kaupunki Jukatanin niemimaalla Meksikossa Yucatánin osavaltiossa. Sen rakentamisen aloittivat mayat. Chichén Itzá kuuluu Unescon maailmanperintöluetteloon Verlan paperitehtaan ohella.
    ellauri339.html on line 56: Luultavasti noin vuonna 987 tolteekkikuningas Quetzalcoatl (mayakielellä Kukulcán) valtasi Chichén Itzán ja teki siitä pääkaupunkinsa. Tolteekkikulttuuri sulautui alueen mayakulttuuriin saaden vaikutteita myös keskisestä Meksikosta ja Puuc (Puuhiset)-kulttuurista.
    ellauri339.html on line 574: Vuonna 2020 hän luovutti Arvovallan vallankumouksen kansallismuseolle kypärän, arafatkan ja lipun, jossa oli merkintä "Tyra" ja marraskuussa 2022 hän siirsi useita henkilökohtaisia ​​esineitä, jotka liittyvät yksikköön "Tyran enkelit" Ukrainan toisen maailmansodan historian kansallismuseoon; siellä niitä käytetään näyttelyssä, joka on omistettu ukrainalaisten taistelulle Venäjää vastaan toisessa maailmansodassa.
    ellauri339.html on line 576: Ihmiset, jotka eivät muista historiaansa, eivät ole valmiita kohtaamaan tulevaisuuttaan, siksi vihollinen menettää suuria voimia ja resursseja juuri niin menneisyyden kuin nykyisyyden historian väärentämisessä. Mutta vaikka kuinka paljon kutsuisit pimeyttä valoksi, sanojen merkitys ei muutu.
    ellauri339.html on line 595: Fast-forward to 2023, and the story is different. Earlier this month NBC News quietly released a report that said U.S. and European officials broached the topic of peace negotiations with Ukraine, including “very broad outlines of what Ukraine might need to give up to reach a deal with Russia.” NBC said “the discussions are an acknowledgment of the dynamics militarily on the ground in Ukraine and politically in the U.S. and Europe.” They began amid concerns that the war has reached a stalemate and about the ability to continue providing open-ended aid to Ukraine.
    ellauri339.html on line 597: Biden administration officials are also worried that Ukraine is running out of men in this war of attrition, while Russia has a seemingly endless supply. Ukraine is struggling with recruiting and recently saw public protests (of course not shown on American T.V.) about President Volodymyr Zelensky’s open-ended conscription requirements. Kiev is resorting to sending 40- and 50-year-olds to the front.
    ellauri339.html on line 599: This comes as Time is reporting Zelensky’s top advisers admitted the war is currently unwinnable for Ukraine. Things look a bit better from the point of view of Ukraine commander-in-chief General Valery Zaluzhny, who believes the war is only at a stalemate. "It's now a battle of inches," say American sources quietly.
    ellauri339.html on line 601: Americans will be forgiven if they never hear this bad news, never mind be surprised by it if they did. The narrative which drove sports teams to wear blue and yellow patches and E Street Band member Steve Van Zandt to paint his guitar the Ukrainian colors was simple. Amidst a flood of propaganda, the story was always the same: Ukraine was pushing back the Russians with weapons provided by a broad range of agreeable NATO benefactors. Between Ukrainian jet fighter aces with improbable kill ratios to patriotic female sniper teams with improbable hair and makeup, Russia was losing. It would be a difficult but noble slog for “as long as it takes” to drive the Russians out.
    ellauri339.html on line 603: Any talk about peace was insulting to Kiev, fighting for its survival and all. Meanwhile, Zelensky at first flew around the world like the antichrist Bono, procuring weapons while showing off his man-to-man relationships with celebrities. (Now desperate, Zelensky is claiming Russia, Iran, and North Korea sponsored Hamas’s attack on Israel as he tries to rustle up support.)
    ellauri339.html on line 608: in the field and reach deep into its vast territory to find ever more conscripts to wait out the enemy. It didn’t hurt that Russia’s capability versus NATO equipment was surprisingly good, or perhaps the Ukrainians’ handling of sophisticated Western arms was surprisingly bad.
    ellauri339.html on line 633: More like this:

    ellauri339.html on line 658: Nyt hän viettää kaksi viikkoa kuukaudessa etulinjassa kouluttamalla joukkoja käyttämään Amor-tablettipohjaista ohjelmistoa, jonka avulla panssarivaunu- ja kranaatinheitinmiehistö kohdistaa hyökkäyksensä separatisteihin ja leikkaavat ne kahtia. Ohjelman suunnitteli GIS Arta, irrallinen kokoelma ukrainalaisia ohjelmoijia, jotka liittyivät yhteen sen jälkeen, kun joukot eksyivät vanhentuneiden Neuvostoliiton karttojen avulla. Come Back Alive tarjoaa tabletteja ja kestäviä kannettavia tietokoneita, jotka käyttävät ohjelmistoa.
    ellauri340.html on line 75:

    Reikäkauha Rene on alkaen teoksesta "Väkivalta ja pyhä" (1972), rakentanut diskurssia pohjimmiltaan väkivallan historiaan, jonka perusta ja alkio on halu. Juupajju, halkio ja kalu. Nyt on kuitenkin raxalla jo naulapyssyn ääni vaiennut.

    ellauri340.html on line 103: Christopher Lasch (1. kesäkuuta 1932 Omaha – 14. helmikuuta 1994 Pittsford) oli yhdysvaltalainen historioitsija, moraalifilosofi ja yhteiskuntakriitikko, joka toimi historian professorina Rochesterin yliopistossa. Lasch pyrki käyttämään historiaa välineenä tuodakseen esiin sen, kuinka laajalti amerikkalaisyhteiskunnassa merkittävät julkiset ja yksityiset instituutiot heikensivät perheiden ja yhteisöjen toimivaltaa ja riippumattomuutta. Hän pyrki luomaan historiatietoisen yhteiskuntakritiikin, joka voisi auttaa amerikkalaisia käsittelemään hillitöntä konsumerismia, köyhtymistä ja sitä, mitä hän kutsui tunnetuksi tulleella termillään "narsismin kulttuuri".
    ellauri340.html on line 106: Lasch oli aina modernin liberalismin kriitikko ja liberalismin historiallisten heikkouksien havainnoitsija, mutta ajan myötä hänen poliittinen näkökulmansa muuttui dramaattisesti. 1960-luvulla hän oli uusmarxilainen ja kitkerä kylmän sodan aikaisen liberalismin kriitikko. 1970-luvulla hän tuki tiettyjä arvokonservatiivisia piirteitä höystettynä vasemmalle kallellaan olevalla kapitalismikritiikillä. Hän diagnosoi amerikkalaisessa kulttuurissa ja politiikassa havaitsemaansa jatkuvaa heikkenemistä Freud-vaikutteisen kriittisen teorian avulla. Ajoittain feministit tuomitsevat hänen kirjoituksiaan kun taas konservatiivit kiittelevät hänen selvää tukeaan perinteiselle perheelle.
    ellauri340.html on line 112: 1960-luvulla Lasch tunnustautui sosialistiksi, 1970-luvulla hän kuitenkin paheksui vasemmiston uskoa ”edistykseen”- teemaa, joka onkin aivan potaskaa, pelkkää kuraa. Tässä vaiheessa Laschille alkoi muotoutua hänelle tunnusomainen yhteiskuntakritiikin tyyli: synteesi freudilaisesta ja sosiaalikonservatiivisesta ajattelusta, joka pysyi erittäin epäluuloisena kapitalismia ja sen vaikutukseen perinteisiä instituutioita kohtaan. Jopa puhtaasti historiallisissakin kirjoissaan hän kritisoi terävästi niin sanottujen "radikaalien" tavoitteita, jotka edustivat pelkästään ahneen kapitalistisen eetoksen äärimmäisiä muotoja. Jep, hyvä Lasch!
    ellauri340.html on line 204: Hyökkääminen hienoja historiallisia,
    ellauri340.html on line 314:
  • Toisen maailmansodan jälkeen oikeudellisessa mielessä on käyty vain neljä sotaa: Israelin itsenäisyyssota, Kuuden päivän sota, Irakin–Iranin sota, Falklandin sota. (joskus mukaan luetaan myös Toinen Intian–Pakistanin sota) Oikeudellisessa mielessä kaikki muut sodat ovat olleet aseellisia selkkauksia. Tästä syystä Kansainvälinen gumanitaarinen oikeus käsittelee "valtioiden välisiä aseellisia selkkauksia" ja "valtioiden sisäisiä aseellisia selkkauksia". Tässä artikkelissa käytetään kuitenkin aseellisen selkkauksen sijasta termiä sota (ja sisällissota) historiallisen vakiintuneisuuden, lyhyyden ja vakiintuneiden mielikuvien vuoksi. EEEHHHEHHHEHHHEH! Lopettakaa! Mä repeen!
    ellauri340.html on line 367: Liiallisen väkivallan kohtaukset on kielletty. Kohtaukset julmasta kidutuksesta, liiallisesta ja tarpeettomasta veitsestä ja aseesta, fyysisestä tuskasta, verisestä ja kauhistuttavasta rikoksesta tulee eliminoida.
    ellauri340.html on line 514: Kirjailijana Handkea on toisinaan luonnehdittu epäpoliittiseksi kirjailijaksi, jota painavat esteettiset ja muodolliset kysymykset (eräs kriitikko lähetti kerran teoksensa "banaalisuuden pahuudena"), mutta hänen kirjojensa leviäminen on myös antipatiaa hänen kotimaataan – Itävaltaa – kohtaan. jonka hän kuvaa materialistisena, vulgaarina eikä kovin kaukana natsimenneisyydestään. Handken romaaneja ja näytelmiä on alusta alkaen määritellyt ihmisviha, jota hän ainakin piti vastalääkeenä oletetun liberaalin Itävallan väärälle sosiaalisuudelle ja sen lähihistorian tuskin paperoidulle fasismille – syvä epäluottamus, joka sai aikaan. hän oli nuorekas kapinallinen 1960-luvulla ja outo taantumuksellinen sen jälkeen.
    ellauri340.html on line 522: Handken vuoden 1972 romaani Short Letter, Long Farewell sisälsi koomista huumoria ja halveksuntaa. Se kertoi itävaltalaisen miehen tiematkasta Yhdysvaltojen halki. Hän etsi ensin vieraantunutta vaimoaan ja sitten pakeni häntä, kun tämä uhkasi tappaa tämän. Kertoja päätyy lopulta elokuvaohjaaja John Fordin taloon, joka on aikansa metafiktiivinen uutuus. Rock and rollia ja kaikkea, jota historia ei rasita, rakastava Handke käytti Yhdysvaltoja näyttönä, jolle hän saattoi heijastaa fantasioitaan. Unelma tyhjän pöydän kansasta (joka tietysti jättää huomioimatta Amerikan oman kansanmurhan menneisyyden) kasvaisi huolenaiheeksi Handkelle, kun hän pyrki laajentamaan itsensä rajoja maailmassa, jossa hän ei ollut koskaan tuntenut olonsa kotoisaksi.
    ellauri340.html on line 535: Repetitionin kulkuri on Filip Kobal-niminen mies, joka asuu Itävallassa, mutta on kotoisin slovenialaisista pakolaisperheestä. Hän matkustaa etelään perintöönsä ja löytää paistomaan ajan ulkopuolelta, jota länsimaisen yhteiskunnan materialistinen korruptio ei vahingoita. Kobal mainitsee harvoin olevansa myös kirjailija, mutta asettuttuaan kylään kalliokarstilla hän kokee uuden vapauden tunteen ja kuvittelee, että tämä uusi elämä saattaa "tuoda jollekulle, jolla on siihen aikaa arkkityypin, alkuperäisen muodon, jonkin asian ydin." Kobalille Balkan oli paikka, johon historia ei voinut puuttua, ja Sloveniasta ja Jugoslaviasta tuli Handken kankaat uudelle fantasialle kotimaasta, valtiottomasta valtiosta, jossa ei ole eroja.
    ellauri340.html on line 545: Varhaisessa näytelmässä nimeltä Kaspar Handke kertoo löyhästi tarinan, joka perustuu Kaspar Hauserin, vankityrmässä kasvaneen pojan, historialliseen tapaukseen. Näytelmä esittelee Kasparin samanlaisessa aistien puutteessa, mutta sen sijaan hän altistuu nyky-yhteiskunnan melulle: joukkomedian moralismin pommitukselle, hygieenisille neuvoille ja tottelemiskäskyille. Samaa kohtaloa peläten Handke on viimeisen kahden vuosikymmenen aikana samalla tavalla vastustanut ulkoisia näkökulmia ja aistihavaintoja, jotka saattavat olla ristiriidassa hänen välittömimpien kokemustensa ja tietonsa kanssa. Mutta luottaen vain omiin lauseisiinsa, hän on muuttanut vastustuksensa nykymaailmaa kohtaan paljon rumammaksi.
    ellauri340.html on line 578: Salman Rushdie has not won the Nobel Prize for Literature, although he has had champions who say that he should win the prize due to his popularity and critical acclaim. The prize is highly competitive, with authors all over the world in mid- and late career stages being eligible. Even those like Salman whose career is practically over. Kolmantena jonossa hiihtää David Schurman WALLACE. Kollaashistakin näkyy että myös hän on kusipää.
    ellauri340.html on line 608: Jean Baudrillard ( UK : / ˈ b oʊ d r ɪ j ɑːr / BOHD -rih -yar, [41] USA : / ˌ b oʊ d r i ˈ ɑːr / BOHD -ree- AR, ranska: ʒʑʁʁ7 ] Heinäkuu 1929 – 6. maaliskuuta 2007) oli vähän apean seniori E. Saarisen näköinen ranskalainen sosiologi, filosofi ja runoilija, joka oli kiinnostunut kulttuurin tutkimuksesta. Hänet tunnetaan parhaiten mediaa, nykykulttuuria ja teknologista viestintää koskevista analyyseistään sekä hypertodellisuuden kaltaisten pellekäsitteiden muotoilusta. Baudrillard kirjoitti monista eri aiheista, mukaan lukien kulutus, talouskritiikki, yhteiskuntahistoria, estetiikka, länsimainen ulkopolitiikka ja populaarikulttuuri. Hänen tunnetuimpia teoksiaan ovat Seduction (1978), Simulacra and Simulation (1981), Amerikka (1986) ja Persianlahden sota (1991). Hänen työnsä yhdistetään usein postmodernismiin ja erityisesti poststrukturalismiin siitä huolimatta että Baudrillard oli vastustanut poststrukturalismia ja etääntynyt postmodernismista.
    ellauri340.html on line 611: Kielen filosofia Kuoleman filosofia Sodan filosofia Arkkitehtuurin filosofia Tiedon filosofia Taiteen filosofia Yhteiskuntatieteen filosofia Historian filosofia Talouskritiikki Arvokritiikki Arvomuoto Yhteiskuntafilosofia Sosiologia (varhainen) Antropologia Patafysiikka Valokuvaus Semiotiikka Terrorismin tutkimus Sosiaalinen historia Länsimainen ulkopolitiikka Populaarikulttuuri.
    ellauri340.html on line 635: Hän väitti, aivan kuten poliittinen teoreetikko Francis Fukuyama, että historia oli päättynyt tai "kadonnut" globalisaation leviämisen myötä ; mutta toisin kuin Fukuyama, Baudrillard vakuutti, ettei tätä päämäärää tulisi ymmärtää historian edistyksen huipentumaksi, vaan jäteläjäxi.
    ellauri340.html on line 637: Baudrillardille kylmän sodan päättyminen ei edustanut ideologista voittoa; pikemminkin se osoitti sekä poliittisen oikeiston että vasemmiston yhteisten utopististen visioiden katoamista . Antaessaan lisätodisteita vastustavansa marxilaisia visioita globaalista kommunismista ja liberaalista näkemystä globaalista kansalaisyhteiskunnasta, Baudrillard väitti, että heidän toivomansa päämäärät olivat aina olleet illuusioita; itse asiassa, kuten The Illusion of the End väittää, hän ajatteli, että ajatus itse päämäärästä ei ollut muuta kuin pelkkää nenästävetoa. Siinä se oli kyllä ihan oikeassa. Apinoiden koko historia itsessään on roskakori. Se on aina ollut paskaläjä, ja se on tehnyt koko planeetasta apinoiden jättimäisen roskakorin.
    ellauri340.html on line 639: Baudrillard sentään honasi, että vaikka aito usko historian yleismaailmalliseen päätepisteeseen, jossa kaikki konfliktit löytäisivät ratkaisunsa, on osoittautunut lööperixi, universaalisuus oli edelleen käsite, jota käytettiin maailmanpolitiikassa tekosyynä. Yleismaailmallisia arvoja, joita hänen mukaansa kukaan ei enää usko universaaliksi, käytetään edelleen retorisesti oikeuttamaan muuten perusteettomia valintoja. Keinot, hän kirjoitti, ovat olemassa, vaikka päämääriin ei enää uskota, ja niitä käytetään piilottamaan nykyajan ankara todellisuus (tai, kuten hän olisi ilmaissut, vaihtoehtoinen totuus).
    ellauri340.html on line 681: FGK rähisemässä Kristiinalle ja mulle kun ei rynnätty Fredin ämyrin kuzumana RUCLin pikapalaveriin "te sankarilliset", Fred ämyröimässä mulle kun en ollut riittävästi puolustanut sen kainaloista germaanikanaa tiedekuntaneuvostossa Auli Hakulista vastaan Fredin käymässä reviirikiistassa keskusteluntutkimuxesta, "this is not your captain speaking, but rather, Fred Karlsson", "vanha professori" vainaja Kristiina-laivalla, Fred antamassa arvosanaa "niukasti hyvä" Kouvolan viran opetusnäytteessä, siitäkin narsistisesta loukkauxesta on oltava sille kiitollinen, kaikki ne kurjat vuodet Kouvolassa mielessä ajaminen alas Kymijoen sillalta tai päin Sipoon kallioleikkausta hernekeitonvärisellä mannepirssillä jonka lämmitys ei toiminut ja moottori leikkasi kiinni Viikin suoralla, kolari diapameissa Korialla, paska hopea Honda tuusannuuskana, joku vanha tietokonerakkine pelkääjän paikalla, kaikki Kouvolan idiootit riitelemässä kultaisen häkin lopetuxesta, ällö keskustalainen ylekansanedustaja apinamiehenä. FGK koitti turhaan viedä tuolit alta sekä Kimmolta että multa, sai ansionsa mukaan kun tyttärestä tuli metrin knääpiö. Sosiaalidarwinisti söi omaa lääkettä. Hylätyt ladot matkan varrella, Koskenkylän autio, uusi hampaaton Opa hyytyi Porvoossa, Rothit naapureineen riemuizivat, ei kannattaisi Wolframin jolla on jo toinen museoauto rukkina.
    ellauri341.html on line 63: Nebukadnessar II (/ n ɛ b j ʊ k ə d ˈ n ɛ z ər /; Babylonin nuolenpääkirjoitus: Nabû-kudurri-uṣur, tarkoittaa "Nabu, kampaa tukkasi"; Raamatun heprea: נְבוּכַדְנֶאצַּר ‎ Nəḇūḵaḏneṣṣar), kirjoitettu myös Nebukadnessar II: ksi, oli toinen Neo-Perlingin isä, hänen ruotsilaisensa Neo-peringi Basar -6. 5 eKr. omaan kuolemaansa vuonna 562 eKr. Historiallisesti tunnettu Nebukadnessar Suurena häntä pidetään tyypillisesti valtakunnan suurimpana kuninkaana. Nebukadnessar on edelleen kuuluisa sotilaallisista kampanjoistaan Levantissa, rakennusprojekteistaan pääkaupungissaan Babylonissa, mukaan lukien Babylonin riippupuutarhat, ja roolistaan juutalaisten historiassa. Tämä Nebukadnessar hallitsi 43 vuotta, ja hän oli Babylonian dynastian pisimpään hallinnut kuningas. Kuolemaansa mennessä hän oli yksi maailman vaikutusvaltaisimmista hallitsijoista.
    ellauri341.html on line 85: Mitään väkevää lukuromaania on siis turha odottaa. Sen sijaan saadaan tuhti annos historian melskeitä ja bakteriologiaa.
    ellauri341.html on line 87: Puhetta, asiaa, historian käänteitä, knoppitietoa, sanaleikkejä, irvailua ja viittauksia tuhanteen suuntaan sen sijaan riittää.
    ellauri341.html on line 110: Kai Ekholm kuvaa tuoreessa kirjassaan Jörn Donner, Kuinka te kehtaatte (Docendo 2020) Donnerin omaelämäkertaa Mammuttia (Otava 2013) ”kirjanperkeleeksi”, jossa kerrottavaa on vain liikaa. Samaa voisi sanoa Teidän edestänne annettu -romaanista. Se pakenee kaikkia yksiselitteisiä määritelmiä aidon postmodernistisen romaanin tapaan sisältäen useita kirjoja yksissä kansissa. Teos on yhtä aikaa historiankirjoitusta, nykyajan kommentointia kuin myös salapoliisiromaanin aineksia sisältävää kulttuurihistoriaa. On harmillista kun kirjalla ei ole selkeätä genreä ja sitä lyytä 1-selitteistä määritelmää. Mikäköhän ikääntyvillä mieskirjailijoilla on, kun teoksien halutaan kattavan koko genreviuhka ja vähän enemmänkin?
    ellauri341.html on line 112: Lukijan näkökulmasta rönsyilyä on kuitenkin hieman liikaa ja teos paikoin kompastuu omaan nokkeluuteensa. Kirjasta jää rannaton olo. Alkuperäinen käsikirjoitus nyt julkaistuun teokseen tosin oli vieläkin laajempi. Käy silti selväksi, ettei ihminen ole sittenkään apina, vaan historiaa uusiksi luova, usein sairas eläin. Nämä jaksot eivät siis varsinaisesti tarjoa uutta tietoa. Terveisin, Jukka Koskelainen, Herlinin Sanomista.
    ellauri341.html on line 114: Puhetta, asiaa, historian käänteitä, knoppitietoa, sanaleikkejä, irvailua ja viittauksia tuhanteen suuntaan riittää kuin erään toisen sairaan eläimen paasauxissa. Tästä Leikolan teoksesta on hyvin vaikea kirjoittaa mitään, sillä se pitää sisällään niin paljon asioita ja tarinoita, että hyvä että lukijakaan muistaa näitä kaikkia juonikuvioita enää lopussa. Tai siis ei muista. Totta totisesti, tämän teoksen kanssa ei ikinä voinut tietää minne tarina vie seuraavaksi. toisin kuin asiallisissa genreromskuissa.
    ellauri341.html on line 119: Leikolalla on varmaankin ollut suurempikin sanoma tässä tiiliskivimäisessä teoksessaan, sillä sen verran tehokkaasti se pyrkii läpileikkaamaan erilaisia historiallisia tilanteita eri näkökulmista. Missä oikeastaan menee hyvän ja pahan raja? Vai onko sitä? Onko se kenties ns. veteen piirretty viiva?
    ellauri341.html on line 123: Teidän edestänne annettu -romaanissa simpanssiksi muuntautunut Jeesus kulkee läpi historian ja näkee ihmisen julmuuden. Elämän monimuotoisuuden näyttävässä romaanissa yli sata fiktiivisistä hahmoa, oikeaa historian henkilöä ja kirjallisuuden ja populaarikulttuurin sankaria saavat roolin historian vastaantulijoina. Oman äänen saavat myös bakteerit. Kuva: Raili Tuikka / Yle, Milja Tuikan kylkimyyryä Isoon Pajaan hiippaileva äiti. 12 min · asia · keskusteluohjelma · pohdiskeleva · lämminhenkinen.
    ellauri341.html on line 263: Aloitettuaan kirjeenvaihdon Mircea Eliaden, tuolloin Yhdysvalloissa asuneen suuren romanialaisen uskontohistorioitsijan kanssa (sen Saul Bellowin vittumaisen naapurin), jota kommunistit pitivät "kansan vihollisena", Gregorian Bivolaru joutui salaisen poliisin ensimmäiseen kierrokseen kotonaan. vuonna 1971, ennen kuin hän täytti 20 vuotta. Absurdilla tekosyyllä etsiä kadonneita naisia varastosta, kolme salaisen poliisin agenttia sai tehtäväkseen ryöstää talon. Itse asiassa he halusivat pelotella häntä ja he ottivat pois kaikki hänen henkisyyttä käsittelevät muistikirjat, kaikki kopiokirjat, muistiinpanot sekä pornokuvat, joita vaihdettiin ulkomailta tulleiden ihmisten kanssa. Näin alkoi salaisen poliisin 19 vuotta kestänyt terrori ja häirintä - joulukuuhun 1989 asti, jolloin Ceausescun hallinto kaatui.
    ellauri341.html on line 371: 8. huhtikuuta 1933 Arlosoroff järjesti historiallisen tapahtuman King David -hotellissa Jerusalemissa Juutalaisviraston puolesta. Lounas, johon osallistuivat Weizmann ja Transjordanin merkittävät arabijohtajat, oli ensimmäinen kerta, kun juutalaiset sionistit ja keskeiset arabit kokoontuivat epäluuloisina yhteen edistämään yhteistyötä näiden kahden ryhmän välillä. Arlosoroff toivoi, että rakentamalla sopimus Transjordanin arabiheikin kanssa poliittisia suhteita pakollisen Palestiinan arabijohtajien kanssa voitaisiin parantaa. Kaikki eivät kuitenkaan olleet tyytyväisiä Arlosoroffin visioon juutalaisten ja arabien yhteistyöstä, eivätkä vaippapäiden mahdollisesta kaxoisnelistyxestä tulevaisuudessa Eretz Israelissa. Lounaan jälkeen arabiradikaalit nuhtelivat avoimesti kokoukseen osallistuneita maltillisia arabeja. Tietyt arabijohtajat pakollisessa Palestiinassa etääntyivät täysin Transjordanian arabivaltuuskunnasta. Erityinen viha kohdistui Transjordanin emiiri Abdullahiin, joka oli Transjordanin suurten alueiden hallitsija, joka oli ottanut johtavan roolin sovittelupyrkimyksissä. Juutalaisten vastustus King David -hotellikokousta kohtaan tuli myös ilmeiseksi, kun uskonnollisen sionismin suurin puolue Mizrachi vaati, että Arlosoroffin tulisi erota asemastaan Juutalaisvirastossa. Jotkut revisionistisen liikkeen radikaalit menivät vielä pidemmälle ja kyseenalaistivat Arlosoroffin oikeuden olla ylipäänsä elävien kirjoissa.
    ellauri341.html on line 373: Vuonna 1933 Arlosoroff ja Saksan valtakunnan virkamiehet pitivät Britannian Palestiinan mandaattia mahdollisuuksien maana hyvin erilaisista syistä. Natsijohdon silmissä syrjäinen Britannian hallitsema alue näytti olevan hyvä "kaatopaikka", joka soveltuu eriöimään tuhansia Hitlerin vastaisia juutalaisia pakolaisia maailman poliittiselta areenalta. Lisäksi rahoitussopimus sionistijohtajien kanssa pakolaisten siirrosta auttaisi vahvistamaan Saksan taloutta, johon natsien vastaiset talouspakotteet ovat vaikuttaneet. Arlosoroffille ja muille sionisteille Saksan juutalaisten ja heidän omaisuutensa mahdollinen joukkosiirto Eretz Israelille tarjosi kuitenkin historiallisen tilaisuuden auttaa takaamaan juutalaisen kansankodin tulevan perustamisen pakolliseen Palestiinaan.
    ellauri341.html on line 386: Haim Arlosoroff murhattiin 16. kesäkuuta 1933, vain kaksi päivää sen jälkeen, kun hän palasi neuvotteluista Saksasta. Hänet tapettiin kävellessä vaimonsa Siman kanssa rannalla Tel Avivissa. Arlosoroffin hautajaiset olivat pakollisen Palestiinan historian suurimmat, ja niissä pörräsi arviolta 70 000 - 100 000 surisijaa. Arlosoroffin kuolema pahensi suuresti poliittisia suhteita sionistisen liikkeen sisällä.
    ellauri341.html on line 452: Georg Neithardt (* 31. Januar 1871 in Nürnberg; † 1. November 1941 in Rottach-Egern) war Richter am Bayerischen Volksgericht. Unter anderem leitete er den infolge des Hitler-Ludendorff-Putsches eröffneten Hochverratsprozess gegen Adolf Hitler und seine Mitverschwörer im Frühjahr 1924 (siehe Hitler-Prozess). Neithardt sympathisierte mit den Putschisten, die die Demokratie in Deutschland beseitigen wollten. Auch deshalb wurden sie nur zu äußerst milden Strafen verurteilt.
    ellauri341.html on line 456:
    Vähän kaulus taitaa ahistaa jo tässä vaiheessa.

    ellauri341.html on line 476:
    Max Jakobson mukana Suomen historian merkittävimmissä käänteissä: Presidentti Urho Kekkosen seurassa Hawaijilla noottikriisin aikaan 1961.

    ellauri341.html on line 489: Elokuvassa Star Wars: The Last Jedi Poe Dameron on muun Vastarinnan jäsenten ohella evakuoitumassa D’Qarin tukikohdasta juuri kun Ensimmäinen ritarikunta hyökkää. Kesken evakuoinnin, Poe päättää vastoin Leian käskyjä johtaa laivueen MG-100 StarFortress SF-17 -pommittajia tuhoamaan Mandator IV -luokan tähtitaistelulaiva Fulminatrixin. Vaikka taistelulaiva saadaan tuhottua, kaikki pommittajat tuhoutuvat hyökkäyksessä ja niiden miehistöt kuolevat. Rangaistuksena Leia alentaa Poen komentajasta kokkipojaksi. Myöhemmin ritarikunta hyökkää Vastarinnan laivaston kimppuun ja melkein kaikki sen johtajista, Leiaa lukuun ottamatta, saavat surmansa. Leia on kuitenkin tajuton ja vara-amiraali Amilyn Holdo toimii hänen sijaisenaan. Poe päättää Finnin ("suomalainen!") ja mekaanikko Rose Ticon avustuksella hankkiutua eroon yksinvaltias Snoken omalla tähtitaistelulaiva Supremacylla sijaitsevasta jäljityslaitteesta ja pitää suunnitelmansa salassa Holdolta. Kun Holdo päättää evakuoida komentoalus Raddusin, Poe päättää nousta kapinaan. Finn, Rose ja BB-8 kuitenkin epäonnistuvat jäljityslaitteen deaktivoimisessa ja Leia pysäyttää Poen kapinoinnin. Poe saa tietää, että Leian ja Holdon suunnitelma oli evakuoida Vastarinnan joukot mineraaliplaneetta Craitille ja lähettää sieltä hätäsignaali heidän liittolaisilleen. Ritarikunta sai Finnin ja Rosen epäonnistumisen myötä tietää evakuoinnista ja Poe johtaa vanhoilla V-4X-D -kiitureilla vastahyökkäystä AT-M6 -kävelijöitä vastaan. Vastarinta on tästä huolimatta alakynnessä, eivätkä liittolaiset uskalla tulla apuun. Luke Skywalkerin pitäessä Voiman kautta lähettämällään kuvajaisella Kylo Renin joukot kiireisenä, Poe opastaa Vastarinnan eloonjääneet tunneleiden kautta Reyn ja Chewbaccan luokse, jotka evakuoivat heidät Millennium Falconiin.
    ellauri341.html on line 491: Elokuvassa Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, noin vuosi Craitin taistelun jälkeen, Poe, Finn, Chewbacca ja trodatome-rotuun kuuluva mekaanikko Klaud käyvät Sintan jäätiköllä tapaamassa yhteyshenkilöään Booliota, jolla on viesti Ensimmäisen ritarikunnan vakoojalta. Pakomatkan aikana Poe tekee monta hyperajohyppyä karistaakseen TIE-hävittäjät kannoiltaan, muun muassa Cardovyten kristallikaaoksen, Ivezian peilitornien ja Tyfonisen tähtisumun läpi. Vakoojan viestin kautta Vastarinta saa vahvistuksen siitä, että Galaktisen Imperiumin keisari Palpatinen oli palannut kuolleista. Kun Rey löytää jedien pyhistä kirjoista Luken muistiinpanoja tiennäyttäjästä, joka johdattaisi sithien kätketylle planeetalle, Exegolille, Poe, Finn, Chewbacca, BB-8 ja C-3PO lähtevät hänen kanssaan aavikkoplaneetta Pasaanalle tapaamaan Lando Calrissiania, joka kertoi, että tiennäyttäjän sijainnin paljastava tikari oli nähty viimeksi reliikinmetsästäjä ja salamurhaaja Ochin hallussa. He löytävät Ochin jäänteet, hänen aluksensa sekä tikarin, mutta Kylo Ren, Renin rtarit ja iskusotilaat kaappaavat Falconin ja vangitsevat Chewbaccan. Kun Rey vahingossa tuhoaa yhden kuljetusaluksista ja he luulevat Chewbaccan kuolleen, he lähtevät Kijimille tapaamaan Poen vanhoja tuttavia, Zorii Blissiä ja Babu Frikiä, jotta C-3PO voisi paljastaa tikarin kirjoituksen käännöksen.
    ellauri341.html on line 503: Jos et ole seurannut casting-uutisia tarkasti, saatat ihmetellä, kuka esittää Zoria Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker -elokuvassa . Kaikkien elokuvan uusien hahmojen joukossa Zorii on erityisen kiehtova : rikollinen, jolla on monimutkainen historia Edgar Allan Poen kanssa. Kypärän alla on kuitenkin näyttelijä, jonka varmasti tunnet: Keri Russell!
    ellauri341.html on line 545: Pennsylvanian yliopistossa kotvan (2019-present) MBA:ta opiskellut riippumaton kirjailija ja tutkija, joka on erikoistunut uskontojen historiaan, mytologiaan, muinaiseen historiaan ja vertailevaan uskontoon, Catalin näyttää ihmiskunnan matkan ja kuinka ymmärtää mytologiaa esi-isiemme silmin. (Vierailtu 1 005 kertaa, 1 käynti tänään). MYTOLOGINEN SÄÄTIÖ. LinkedIn activity: STOP PUTIN.
    ellauri342.html on line 79: Joka ei ole nähnyt Avignonia paavien aikana, ei ole nähnyt mitään. Iloisuudelle, elämälle, animaatioille, juhlajunalle, ei koskaan sen kaltaista kaupunkia. Siellä oli aamusta iltaan kulkueita, pyhiinvaelluksia, kukkien täynnä olevia katuja, korkeita listoja, kardinaalien saapuminen Rhônen varrella, lippuja tuulessa, lipuilla koristeltuja keittiöitä, paavin sotilaat laulamassa latinaaetsivien veljien paikat, helistimet; sitten niiden talojen ylhäältä alas, jotka kuhisivat suuren paavinpalatsin ympärillä kuin mehiläiset pesänsä ympärillä, kuului taas pitsikutomakoneiden tikitystä, kultaa kutovien sukkuloiden tuloa ja menoa, rypäleen pikkuvasaroita. kaiverret, lutterien säätämät äänilaudat, loimijan hymnit; sen yläpuolella kellojen kohina ja aina muutama tamburiini, jotka kuuluivat huminaan, tuolla päin siltaa. Koska meillä, kun ihmiset ovat onnellisia, heidän täytyy tanssia, heidän on tanssittava; ja koska tuolloin kaupungin kadut olivat liian kapeita farandoleille, Avignonin sillalle sijoitettiin fifet ja tamburiinit Rhônen raikkaassa tuulessa, ja siellä tanssittiin päivällä ja yöllä, tanssi siellä... Ah! iloiset ajat! onnellinen kaupunki! Halberdit, jotka eivät leikkaa; osavaltion vankiloissa, joissa viiniä jäähdytettiin. Ei koskaan pulaa; ei koskaan sotaa... Näin Comtatin paavit tiesivät kuinka hallita kansaansa; siksi heidän kansansa katui heitä niin paljon!...

    ellauri342.html on line 80: Jos et olisi nähnyt Avignonia paavin aikoina, et olisi nähnyt mitään. varten iloisuus, elämä, elinvoima ja peräkkäiset juhlat, mikään kaupunki ei ollut sen arvoinen tähyillä. Aamusta iltaan oli kulkueita, pyhiinvaelluksia, kukkien täynnä olevia katuja, korkealle ripustettuja seinävaatteita, kardinaaleja saapumassa Rhone, lintuja, galleriat lipuilla, paavin sotilaat laulamassa Latinaa ruuduilla ja veljesten keräilylaatikoitaan helisemässä. Tällaisia ​​ääniä kuului korkeimmasta pienimpään asunto, joka tungosta ja kuhisi ympäri suuren paavinpalatsin, kuin mehiläiset pesän ympärillä. Siellä kuului pitsivalmistajien napsahdus koneet, edestakaisin ja sukkulat kudonta kultaa lankaa varten kaapeleita, jyrkän kaivertajien pienet vasaran naput, twanging harmoniset asteikot jousisoittimen päättäjien, laulu-lauluja kutojat ja ennen kaikkea kellojen soitto ja aina sykkivät tamburiinit, alas sillan vieressä. Näet, tässä Provence, kun ihmiset ovat onnellisia, heidän täytyy tanssia ja tanssia. Ja sitten; heidän täytyy tanssia taas. Kun kaupungin kadut osoittautuivat liian kapeiksi farandole, fiferit ja tamburiinisoittimet asetettiin jäähdytykseen Rhônen tuuli, _Sur le pont d'Avignon_, jossa ympäri vuorokauden, _l'on y dansait, l'on y dansait_. Voi kuinka onnellisia aikoja; niin onnellinen kaupunki. Halbardit, jotka eivät ole koskaan tappaneet ketään, osavaltion vankilat käytetään vain viinin jäähdyttämiseen. Ei koskaan nälänhätää. Ei koskaan sotaa... Se on kuinka Comtatin paavit hallitsivat kansaansa, ja siksi heidän kansansa oli niitä niin ikävä....
    ellauri342.html on line 329:
    Keijo Kullervo Kalske (February 28, 1912, Lahti, Finland – January 26, 1977, Helsinki, Finland) was a Finnish actor. Kalske, who worked as a police officer in Kotka before his film career, had performed occasionally at Kotka City Theater. Bulky and broad-shouldered, the 186-centimeters-tall Kalske was often seen on stage and in films in the roles of a soldier, a police or a guard, who he was perfectly fit to interpret with professionalism due to his police background.

    ellauri342.html on line 394: World Laughter Day is celebrated every year on the first Sunday of May, and this year it is celebrated on May 5. Shrill or funny, giggly or bubbly, on this day, let out your laughter and laugh to your heart’s content. As Shakespeare said, “With mirth and laughter, let old wrinkles come.” We want you to spend your life with laughter and joy. Did you know that laughter decreases stress? By laughing, the brain releases endorphins which make one feel happy. So do not let anyone dampen your day, and laugh as much as you want.
    ellauri342.html on line 398: International Moment of Laughter Day is celebrated on April 14 every year. This is the day to let your inner child come out and laugh away all your worries. You can laugh out loud or giggle, in fact, you can do whatever you want but make sure you’re laughing at the same time. This day reminds us to look beyond our anxious lives and find something that puts a big smile on our faces.
    ellauri342.html on line 399: The history of International Moment of Laughter Day dates back to 1997 when a humor consultant and psychologist, Izzy Gesell, invited the whole world to join in this day and do some fun activities to encourage everyone to laugh. It makes a person positive! International Moment of Laughter Day is all about celebrating joy and happiness. This day focuses on shifting a person's view of life from pessimistic to optimistic.
    ellauri342.html on line 417: Ugly Sweater Day. Every third Friday of December (December 15), people all over the nation trade their casual garments for something more festive for Ugly Sweater Day. Whether you find a hidden gem to wear, or you make your own, one things for sure — this holiday will certainly have you laughing all day long!
    ellauri342.html on line 460: Into whisper, laugh, and scream. päästäxeen Amerikan unelmasta vähällä.
    ellauri342.html on line 494: Long for colors on your dresses, Kaipaat mekkoihisi värejä,
    ellauri342.html on line 561: Late in the 18th century, other printers began publishing the complete King James Bible. Isaac Collins printed his Bible in 1791; the Collins Bible became known as the first "Family Bible" printed in America. Isaiah Thomas published the first illustrated King James Bible in 1791.
    ellauri342.html on line 570: Edwin Jack Fisher (August 10, 1928 – September 22, 2010) was an American singer and actor. He was one of the most popular artists during the 1950s, selling millions of records and hosting his own TV show, The Eddie Fisher Show. Actress Elizabeth Taylor was best friends with Fisher's first wife, actress Debbie Reynolds. After Taylor's third husband, Mike Todd, another entertainment Jew, was killed in a plane crash over Mexico 1958, Fisher divorced Reynolds and he and Taylor married that same year.
    ellauri342.html on line 574: Rakas rakas rakas on Toivo Kärjen ja Metro-tyttöjen kappale. Ei sitä herra Tisch kyllä laulanut. Sensijaan se levytti Tevjen Sunrise, sunset schlaagerin. In 1981, Fisher wrote an autobiography, Eddie: My Life, My Loves, jossa se tuuletti 5 vaimoaan. He wrote another autobiography in 1999 titled Been There, Done That. The latter book devotes little space to Fisher's singing career, but recycled the material of his first book and added many new sexual details that were too strong to publish before. Upon the book's publication, his daughter Carrie (tämä Leija) declared: "I'm thinking of having my DNA fumigated." No nyt on Leijakin jo vainaja. Se existoi enää hologrammina.
    ellauri342.html on line 576:
    ellauri343.html on line 119: elämä ISÄNMAALLE: Tästä romaanista syntyi elokuva Rukajärven tie. Eipäsvaan pikemminkin päinvastoin! Ko. läpyskä on kohennettu romaanixi leffamanuskasta. Siltä se vaikuttaakin kyllä. Antti Tuuri kertoo romaanissaan jatkosodasta, velvollisuudesta ja tyhmänrohkeudesta - äärimmäisistä olosuhteista, joihin maailmanhistorian tapahtumat suomalaisia miehiä heittelivät kuin ajopuita.
    ellauri343.html on line 140: Vlad, he ovat voittamattomia paikallisessa historiassaan, mutta tosiasioiden mukaan heitä lyötiin ja pahoinpideltiin heikosti, joten heidän elokuvansa ovat puhtaasti kotimaisille kuluttajille.
    ellauri343.html on line 161: PPSh:ta on joskus virheellisesti väitetty Suomi-konepistoolin kopioksi. Aseiden rakenteessa on paljon eroja, vaikka niiden toimintaperiaate eli massasulku on samanlainen. PSh-41 historia Suomessa: Ensimmäiset aseet saatiin vuoden 1942 alussa neuvostoliittolaisia sotavankeja "kuulustelemalla". Pian tämän jälkeen konepistooleja saatiin sotasaaliiksi, niiden määrän noustua neuvostojoukkojen aseistuksessa. Jatkosodan päätyttyä vuonna 1944 suomalaisilla oli näitä konepistooleja noin 2 500 kappaletta. SA-kuvissa PPSh-konepistooleita näkyy niin ruumiskasoissa kuin rintamamiesten käsissä. Ilmeisesti suomalaiset sotilaat ottivat sinänsä toimivan aseen omakseen, vaikka patruunahuoltoa ei valtion puolesta tiettävästi järjestetty valtion toimesta. Pateja ostettiin sittemmin Saxasta.
    ellauri343.html on line 163: Pidän suuresti PPSh:lla ampumisesta. Ase on suuresta tulinopeudestaan huolimatta miellyttävä ammuttava ja melko helposti hallittava myös sarjatulella. Suomi-konepistooliin verrattuna PPSh on kilon kevyempi ja siksi mukavampi kantaa. Varmistin osana lukkoa on helppo käyttää ja liikkuu ainakin tässä aseyksilössä sulavasti. Laukaisu on sen sijaan pitkä, raskas ja rohiseva, kuten odottaa voikin. Konepistoolissa tämä ei ole kovin oleellinen kysymys ja raskas laukaisu on turvallisuusominaisuus.
    ellauri343.html on line 288: Suunnitelma kuitenkin kehittyi hyvin. E. E. Kailan Jääkäritoimisto lähetti Repolaan 500 kivääriä ja 100 000 patruunaa. Lieksan ja Joensuun alueen sotilasviranomaiset saatiin ummistamaan silmät asekuljetuksilta. 16. joulukuuta Bobi Sivénin Paavo-veljelleen kirjoittamassa kirjeessä Sivén kertoi, että metsää oli saatu myytyä kahden miljoonan markan arvosta. Joulukuussa 1920 Sivén vietti Eemil Huhtalan kanssa Porajärvellä viikon ja muodosti alueella 60-miehisen joukon, joka vetäytyisi merkin saatuaan karhunpesään, Repolaan. Muuten Sivén ja Huhtala päättivät jättää Porajärven suosiolla bolševikeille. Porajärvellä käynti kuitenkin masensi Sivéniä ja matkan jälkeen hän sanoi epätoivoisena Huhtalalle: "Olisi parasta laskea kuula kalloonsa, eihän sitä ilkiä palata Suomeen. Uskotko Huhtala sitä?". Huhtala vastasi, ettei Sivén ajatellut asiaa noin, mutta Sivén vain valitti väsymystään.
    ellauri344.html on line 47: Länsi liittoutui banderöllien tueksi maailmanhistoriallisesti harvinaisen yksimielisesti ja on tukenut Ukrainaa vähintään 75 miljardilla dollarilla jo pelkin asein. Lähes kahden vuoden mittaiseen puolustussotaan mahtuu mahtavia urotekoja, kuten rospuuton suoma torjuntavoitto Kiovan esikaupunkialueilla ja Harkovin polkupyörätehtaan takaisinvaltaus. Samalla on tosiasia ja suorastaan huoneessa ahdistavana leijuva elefantti, että rintamalinjat ovat jämähtäneet paikoilleen, ja niille sijoilleen jäädessään Ukraina menettää Venäjälle viidesosan pinta-alastaan. Vähemmällä taisi päästä urhea pieni Suomi? Jokainen Venäjän eduksi kääntyvä päivä sodassa tarkoittaa sitä, että Putinin välillinen uhka alkaa siirtyä Ukrainasta kohti oikeata länttä. Tällöin länsimaat tarvitsevat omaa asevarantoaan pelotteeksi jatkuvasti kipeämmin, jolloin aseapu vähävenäläisille pitäisi itse asiassa kärjistäen keskeyttää heti.
    ellauri344.html on line 53: Suomen järkevin ratkaisu tulevaisuudessa voi hyvin olla pyytää Yhdysvalloilta tai muilta liittolaisilta niin lujaa läsnäoloa maassamme kuin on mahdollista – ja pysyvää sellaista. Eli pysyvä natomiehitys Suomen rajoille. Silloin luottamuksemme olisi hirtehisesti puolustusliitossa, joka ei Ukrainan sodassa tehnyt mitään oikein. Mutta anglosaxit! Niitä rakastamme myötä- ja vastoinkäymisissä. Ennätyksellisen läheiset, maiden väliset puolustussopimukset – DCA Yhdysvaltojen kanssa ja JEF-yhteistyö Britannian kanssa – voivat joskus olla arvokkaampia kuin niitä allekirjoitettaessa edes uskallettiin ennakoida. Joskus joo takusti, kun lipputangot kukkivat. Nupulla ovat jo.
    ellauri344.html on line 66: Pohjalainen hevosaliups. Nirha. Saappaat ahistavat. Nirhataan ruumiinryöstössä.
    ellauri344.html on line 89: Marvel Studiosin alamäki vain pahenee – The Marvelsin katsojakato on pahin MCU:n historiassa
    ellauri344.html on line 92: Aikaisempi listaykkönen The Marvels menetti avausviikonloppunsa jälkeen jopa 79 prosenttia katsojistaan. Vastaavaa romahdusta ei ole nähty koskaan ennen Marvel Studiosin historiassa. Tähän asti pahin romahtaja on ollut alkuvuoden Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, jonka katsojakato oli avausviikonlopun jälkeisenä viikonloppuna 69,9 prosenttia.
    ellauri344.html on line 102: The Marvels Marvel-elokuvien suosio on romahtanut – Nyt Disney-pomo Bob Iger kertoi, mistä se johtuu The Marvels Marvel Studiosin uusin elokuva on historiallinen floppi – nyt Disneyn johtaja keksi, mistä epäonnistuminen johtui: Siitä että Marvels on aivan PASKA! The Marvels:
    ellauri344.html on line 120: Huhu: Oppenheimer-tähti Cillian Murphy esittää vuonna 2025 Marvelin ehkä parasta superpahista
    ellauri344.html on line 162: historia/ki/1919/ki-i-kok.htm">https://www.marxists.org/suomi/historia/ki/1919/ki-i-kok.htm
    ellauri344.html on line 164: Kapitalistinen järjestelmä on alusta aikain ollut ryöstön ja joukkomurhain järjestelmä. Kauhistukset, jotka kapitalismin siirtomaapolitiikka toi mukanaan raamatun, kuppataudin ja paloviinan avulla säälimättömästi hävittäessään kokonaisia heimoja ja kansoja; lukemattomien työläisten heikontaminen ja ennenaikaiseen kuolemaan jouduttaminen nälässä ja kurjuudessa; työväenluokan verinen masentaminen sen milloin noustessa riistäjiään vastaan, ja lopuksi tuo ääretön, epäinhimillinen verilöyly, joka muuuti maailmantuotannon ihmisruumistuotannoksi — kas siinä kuva kapitalistisesta järjestyksestä.
    ellauri344.html on line 181: 8. »Sananvapaus» on myöskin eräs »puhtaan demokratian» huomatuimpia tunnussanoja. Kuitenkin työläiset tietävät, ja kaikkein maiden sosialistit ovat sen myöntäneet miljoonia kertoja, että tämä vapaus on petosta niinkauan kun paraat kirjapainot ja suurimmat paperivarastot ovat kapitalistien käsissä ja niinkauan kun kapitalistit hallitsevat lehtiä, valta, joka koko maailmassa ilmenee sitä selvemmin ja terävämmin, niin, vieläpä sitä kyynillisemmin mitä kehittyneempi demokratia ja tasavaltainen hallitus on, kuten esimerkiksi Amerikassa. Kapitalisteilta on ensinnä otettava pois mahdollisuus hankkia palvelukseensa kirjailijoita, ostaa kustantamoja ja varastoja sekä lahjoa sanomalehtiä ennenkuin työtätekevät joukot, työläiset ja talonpojat, saavat nauttia todellisesta yhdenvertaisuudesta ja kansanvallasta, ja sitä varten on murskattava kapitalismin ies, kukistettava riistäjät ja murrettava niiden vastustus. Kapitalistit ovat aina tarkottaneet vapaudella, rikkaiden vapautta hankkia itselleen etuja ja voittoja ja työläisten vapautta kuolla nälkään. Kapitalistit merkitsevät painovapaudella rikkaiden vapautta lahjoa sanomalehdistö, valmistaa ja väärentää n.s. yleistä mielipidettä. »Puhtaan demokratian» puolustajat paljastavat siten itse asiassa olevansa likaisimman, lahjottavimman järjestelmän puolustajia, he puolustavat rikkaiden valtaa hallita joukkojen valistusvälineitä, he ovat kansan pettäjiä, jotka sulosointuisten, mutta läpeensä valheen saastuttamien lauseparsien avulla johdattavat kansan pois sen selvästä historiallisesta tehtävästä: vapauttaa sanomalehdistö kapitaalista.
    ellauri344.html on line 183: Yhdeksännentoista ja kahdennenkymmenen vuosisadan historia on jo ennen sotaa näyttänyt meille, mitä itse asiassa kapitalismin alainen »puhdas demokratia» oikeastaan on. Marxilaiset ovat aina väittäneet, että mitä kehittyneempi, mitä »puhtaampi» demokratia on, sitä peittelemättömämmäksi, kärjistyneemmäksi ja armottomammaksi muodostuu luokkataistelu, sitä selvemmin esiintyy pääoman painostus ja porvariston diktatuuri.
    ellauri344.html on line 271: Vaiettu aihe: Koko Suomi on venäjämielinen! Jenni Haukio on täysin pihalla. Suomen ei tarvitse hävetä historiaansa natsi-saksan asepikkuveljenä. Niin. Ainakin on ihmetteleminen meidän pakkorahoitetun valtionmedian, yle:n toimintaa ja sanavalintoja. Toissapäivänä, 30.11. yle:n uutistenlukija Heikki Lukinmaa käytti Talvisodan syttymisestä ilmausta ’Venäjän vihollisuudet ’.
    ellauri344.html on line 283: Historia ei toista itseään, vaan historiallisesti samankaltaiset tapahtumat toistuvat.
    ellauri345.html on line 70: Minna Herzlieb starb mit 76 Jahren in Görlitzer Irrenhaus im Jahre 1865. Zu der Zeit war es üblich, dass man dort beerdigt wurde, wo man verstarb. Und das es Goethes Minchen nach Görlitz verschlug, hatte mit ihren psychischen Problemen zu tun. Goethe sagte einst: “Ich habe sie als Kind von 8 Jahren zu lieben angefangen, und in ihrem sechzehnten liebte ich sie mehr als billig”.
    ellauri345.html on line 124: Suomessa Active Club aikoo osallistua Suomi herää -marssiin itsenäisyyspäivänä. Active Club Finlandin julkaisemissa kuvissa ja videoilla sen jäsenet muun muassa varjonyrkkeilevät ja kiinnittävät tolppiin itsenäisyyspäivän marssia ja valkoista ylivaltaa markkinoivia tarroja. Yksi videoista esittää vuorotellen kuvia veneissä istuvista mustista siirtolaisista ja toisiaan nyrkkeilevistä valkoisista miehistä.
    ellauri345.html on line 165: Tarkastelematta asiaa tarkemmin, polvihousujen jo pahasti ahistaessa sepaluxen kohalta, herra von Reva-avanne suostutteli kauniin muukalaisen antamaan itsensä johdattaa linnaan. Hiän ei tee vaikeuksia, hiän kulkee mukana ja näyttää olevansa henkilö, joka on kiertänyt muutakin kuin tahkoa. Virvokkeita (tavanomaisia tyrmäystippoja) tuodaan, jotka hiän ottaa vastaan, ilman väärää kohteliaisuutta ja mitä armollisimmilla kiitoksilla. Lounasta odotellessa hiänelle näytetään talo. Hiän huomaa vain sen, mikä ansaitsee erottelun, oli se sitten huonekaluja, maalauksia tai makuutilojen asianmukaista pohjaratkaisua. Hiän löytää kirjaston, hiän tuntee hyvät kirjat ja puhuu niistä maulla ja vaatimattomasti. Ei puhetta, ei noloa. Pöydässä yhtä jalo ja luonnollinen käytös ja ystävällisin keskustelusävy kuin pehkuissa. Toistaiseksi kaikki hiänen keskustelussaan on järkevää, ja hiänen luonteensa vaikuttaa yhtä ystävälliseltä kuin hiänen henkilönsä.
    ellauri345.html on line 270: Der Landsturm war im Militärwesen seit dem 15. Jahrhundert „das letzte Aufgebot“ aller Wehrpflichtigen, die weder dem Landheer noch der Marine angehören, zur Abwehr eines feindlichen Einfalls. Suomexi nostomies. The favorable comparison made by Lessing between the quintessential German poet, Goethe, and Mendelssohn is a mark of the esteem in which he was held. Lessing told Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi that once Goethe regained his reason, he would be hardly more than an ordinary man. At the very same time he said of Mendelssohn that he was the most lucid thinker, the most excellent philosopher, and the best literary critic of the century.
    ellauri345.html on line 274: Stefan George galt als verschlossenes, eigenbrötlerisches Kind, das schon früh zur Selbstherrlichkeit neigte. Nebenbei lernte er selbstständig Italienisch, Hebräisch, Griechisch, Latein, Dänisch, Niederländisch, Polnisch, Englisch, Französisch und Norwegisch, um fremde Literaturen im Original lesen zu können. Seine Sprachbegabung veranlasste ihn auch, mehrere Geheimsprachen zu entwickeln. Eine davon behielt er bis zum Ende seines Lebens für persönliche Notizen bei; da jedoch alle entsprechenden Unterlagen nach seinem Tod vernichtet wurden, ist sie bis auf zwei Zeilen in einem Gedicht verloren und diese können auch nicht mehr entschlüsselt werden.
    ellauri345.html on line 438: Bleibende Eindrücke hinterließen 1898 das Frühwerk Hugo von Hofmannsthals und das Werk Stefan Georges. 1898 begann Borchardt mit der Arbeit an einer Dissertation über Gattungen der griechischen Lyrik, die jedoch nicht abgeschlossen wurde. Nach persönlichen Krisen und einer schweren Erkrankung im Februar 1901 verwarf Borchardt den Plan einer Universitätslaufbahn. Im Januar 1902 überwarf Borchardt sich mit seinem Vater, da dieser ihm monatliche Zahlungen verweigerte. Am 17. Februar reiste er nach Rodaun und besuchte den von ihm verehrten Hugo von Hofmannsthal. Seit 1903 lebte er mit einigen Unterbrechungen in der Toskana und wohnte in einer Villa in Monsagrati bei Lucca. 1906 heiratete Borchardt in London die Malerin Karoline Ehrmann (1873–1944) und kehrte mit ihr nach Italien zurück.
    ellauri345.html on line 442: Aufgrund seiner jüdischen Herkunft lebte er ab 1933 immer zurückgezogener. Dies hinderte ihn nicht, dem faschistischen Diktator Mussolini im April 1933 ein Exemplar seiner Übertragung von Dantes Divina Commedia zu überreichen.
    ellauri345.html on line 450: Während des Weltkrieges habe Borchardt blutrünstige Kriegshetze und Kriegspropaganda betrieben, zur Vernichtung der europäischen Zivilisation aufgerufen und das Volk verhöhnt. Er habe deutsche Kriegsziele propagiert, die „weit grausamer, unmenschlicher, tückischer waren als die schlimmsten Sätze des Versailler Vertrages“. Borchardt sei der erste deutsche Schriftsteller, „der Bücherverbrennungen, Prügel und Martern und all die unaussagbare Rohheit des Faschismus“ vor dessen Machtantritt empfohlen habe. Nachdem sich in Deutschland die Vorstellungen Borchardts verwirklicht hätten, könne seine eigene Literatur dort nicht mehr erscheinen, was ein Unrecht sei, „denn vor solchem Verdienst hätten sich die regierenden Faschisten beugen müssen“. Sein Roman verkündete einen „aristokratischen Faschismus“.
    ellauri345.html on line 480: Ja täten esihistoria, jonka Goethe suunnitteli romaanille, on todistus mitä erehtymättömimmistä tunteista. Eduard ja Charlotte ovat rakastaneet toisiaan ennenkin, mutta molemmat solmivat mitättömän avioliiton ennen kuin he olivat laillisesti yhdistyneet. Ehkä vain tällä tavalla se voisi jäädä hämärään, missä virhe on molempien puolisoiden elämässä: joko edellisessä päättämättömyydessä tai nykyisessä uskottomuudessa.
    ellauri345.html on line 500: Lisää mysteerejä. Esinettä, jolle kuori on viime kädessä välttämätön, ei voi kuvailla millään muulla tavalla. Koska vain kauneus eikä mikään sen ulkopuolella voi olla olennaista, kauneuden jumalallinen pohja on mysteerissä. Joten ulkonäkö siinä on juuri tämä: ei asioiden tarpeeton kätkeminen itsessään, vaan asioiden välttämätön kätkeminen meille. Tällainen kätkeminen on toisinaan jumalallisesti tarpeellista, koska on jumalallisesti määrätty, että väärään aikaan paljastettuna tuo huomaamaton asia ei haihdu mihinkään, jolla paljastus korvaa salaisuudet. Kantin opetus, jonka mukaan suhteellinen luonne on kauneuden perusta, puolustaa siksi voitokkaisesti metodologisia taipumuksiaan paljon korkeammalla kuin psykologinen. Kuten ilmestys, kaikki kauneus sisältää historiallis-filosofisia tiedekuntajärjestyksiä itsessään. Koska se ei tee ideaa näkyväksi, vaan pikemminkin sen salaisuudeksi.
    ellauri345.html on line 545: Henki on selkeästi jotain jota saadaan yläkerrasta. Yllättävää kyllä sielu on osa henkeä, mutta samaan aikaan kuitenkin se sisältää myös ruumiin, ml. luut, sisuskalut, muskelit ja sukupuolielimet. Se on suunnilleen sama asia kuin elämä tai ize asiassa koko apina. Sielu on sitä myötä myöskin oikeastaan paha. Aina uutta juonta sahaa, ankat. Joskus hyvää, joskus pahaa, ankat. Sielu on apina horisontaalisesti tarkasteltuna, henki sen vertikaalinen ateriahissi taivaaseen. Jotain tällästä.
    ellauri345.html on line 637: Arndt oli maaorjan poika Rügenin saarelta, joka silloin kuului Ruotsille, ja kävi haluttomasti koulua Stralsundissa. Hän opiskeli teologiaa Greifswaldissa ja Jenassa tarkoituksena valmistua papiksi. mutta hänestä tuli kuitenkin Greifswaldissa historian professori vuodesta 1806 sekä historian professori Bonnin yliopistossa vuodesta 1818. Greifswald sijaitsee Koillis-Saksassa, Mecklenburg-Etu-Pommerin osavaltiossa. Kaupunki rakennettiin Itämeren eteläiselle rannalle, Rügenin ja Usedomin saarten väliin. Pienet saaret Koos ja Riems ovat osa kaupunkia. Pieni Ryck-joki virtaa vanhan kaupungin lävitse ja laskee vetensä Greifswaldinlahteen. Kokonaisuudessaan kaupungin seutu on suhteellisen tasaista, korkein kohta nousee vain 36 metriin. Greifswaldin yliopistossa (vuodesta 1933 vuoteen 2018 Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald) opiskelee noin 13 000 opiskelijaa. Yliopiston suomen kielen oppituoli on koko Saksan vanhin. Suomen kielen opiskelu tapahtuu samassa laitoksessa skandinaavisten kielten kanssa.
    ellauri345.html on line 659: Hänen vihansa ranskalaisia ja juutalaisia kohtaan sulautui; hän kutsui ranskalaisia "juutalaiseksi kansaksi". Hänelle ranskalaiset olivat "jalostettuja huonoja juutalaisia". Hän syytti heitä ihmiskaupasta : ”Kaikille saksankielisille piireille annettiin määräyksiä lähettää luettelot nuorista saksalaisista neitsyistä, jotka loistivat rikkautensa, kauneutensa ja sulonsa takia. Nämä oli määrä viedä Ranskaan ja antaa ranskalaisille. Jos tämä olisi voitu toteuttaa, kuinka pian jalo saksalainen tapa olisi ollut paskiainen tällä puolella Reiniä ." Hän sanoi, että useimmat ranskalaiset naiset olivat "haluttuja ja rivoisia sihisevässä, kuiskuvassa ja gurgilevassa käärmeessä ." kielessä itsessään on jotain liukasta, liukasta [sanoisinpa jopa: hohtelevaa], viettelevää ja syntistä." Jos Reinin länsipuoleiset ihmiset haluaisivat tulla maahan, tulee periä tullit, kuten karjasta: "Esine, joka palvelee ylellisyyttä Saksaan tuodaan joka vuosi karjankasvatukselle haitaxi, nimittäin ranskalaisia ja juutalaisia. Mutta se on äärimmäisen haitallista saksalaiselle ihmisjalostukselle, sekä aidon saksalaisen tapon myrkyttämisen että jalo-saksalaisen heimon turmeltumisen vuoksi." Hän kirjoitti edelleen: "Teen työtä koko ikäni varmistaakseni, että halveksun ja vihaan tätä kansaa." Vuonna 1815 Arndt sanoi ranskalaisista: ”Juutalaisiksi minä kutsun heitä uudelleen, en vain heidän juutalaisluettelonsa ja vähäpätöisyytensä vuoksi, vaan vielä enemmän heidän juutalaismaisen sukupuoliyhteytensä vuoksi.” Arndt oli myös yhteydessä Heinrich Eugen Marcardiin ja ilmaisi hyväksyvänsä hänen antisemitistiset jorinansa henkilökohtaisessa kirjeessä.
    ellauri345.html on line 663: Arndt vietti 90. syntymäpäiväänsä vuonna 1859 suuren yleisön osallistuessa. Hän kuoli pian tämän jälkeen 29. tammikuuta 1860. Kovan kamppailun jälkeen Arndtin mukaan nimetty yliopisto muuttui Greifswaldin yliopistoxi 2018. Leipzigin kaupunginvaltuusto päätti 22. tammikuuta 2020 kansanedustaja Thomas Kumbernussin (Die PARTEI, vasemmistoryhmän jäsen) pyynnöstä nimetä Arndtstrassen uudelleen "Hannah-Arendt-Strasseksi". Kumbernuss mainitsi syyksi Arndtin "antisemitistiset, rasistiset, nationalistiset, frankofobiset ja militaristiset tiradit". Keskusteltuaan yleisesti kadunnimien historiallisesta nimeämisestä vetoomuksen "Arndt jää Leipzigeriksi - Ei Arndtstrassen uudelleennimeämistä" käynnistämän keskustelun jälkeen kaupunginvaltuusto kumosi tammikuun päätöksensä 16.9.2020.
    ellauri345.html on line 668: Daumer: "Kristinusko on hengen uskonto... Mutta mitä on henki, spiritus, pneuma sanan kristillisessä merkityksessä? Se, mikä liittyy luontoon, asioiden todelliseen olemiseen ja elämään, mikä tästä uskonnosta eteenpäin on absoluuttinen, mitä ei pitäisi määrittää ja jota kiihkeimmin syytetään, tuomitaan ja vastaan ​​taistellaan nimillä: liha, maailma, synti, paholainen, muodostaa äärimmäisen vastakohdan; kaiken objektiivisen, luonnollisesti oikean ja todellisen, perustavanlaatuinen kumoaminen ja kääntäminen vastakohtaansa; absoluuttinen subjektiivisuus, siis absoluuttinen hulluus ja järjettömyys; eristäytyneimmän ihmisen egon ja erityisyyden vahvistaminen ja jumalallistaminen; koko ihmisen ja koko maailman kieltäminen fyysisenä ja elävänä olentona..; negatiivisin, vihamielisin, repivin ja häiritsevin asia, ja siksi pahin asia, joka on olemassa ja mitä voidaan ajatella. Hengestä, tässä sanan pahassa, kristillisessä merkityksessä, tästä kauheasta kieltämisen ja abstraktion periaatteesta kaikki ne fanaattisuudet ja julmuudet, jotka kristinuskon historiassa ovat, eivätkä ne suinkaan ole jotain vierasta tämän uskonnon olemukselle... vaan pikemminkin sen todellista, ominaista, välttämätöntä ja väistämätöntä kehitystä ja ilmentymää."
    ellauri345.html on line 671: Georg Friedrich Daumer (s. 5. maaliskuuta 1800 Nürnbergissä; † 13. joulukuuta 1875 Würzburgissa, salanimet: Dr. Amadeus Ottokar, Eusebius Emmeran) oli saksalainen uskonnollinen filosofi ja runoilija. Hänestä tuli myös Kaspar Hauserin opettaja. Kaspar Hauser (* oletettavasti 30. huhtikuuta 1812; † 17. joulukuuta 1833 Ansbachissa) tuli tunnetuksi "salaperäisenä löytölapsena". Jonkinlainen julkkis aikanaan, kuten Daumerkin.
    ellauri346.html on line 43: Russia, you may recall, wants to change Ukraine’s political leadership, and to do this it has invaded a sovereign country in violation of the UN charter and accepted international law, and is using violence and intimidation, incl… (more)

    ellauri346.html on line 46: Look, Ivan, this building destroyed by russian pilot. 46 people died. Or 47 if you count the murdered pregnant woman as two people. They have 6 children. The youngest child was 11 months old. 80 people were injured. 11 people remain missing. If this is not terrorism then what are the jews doing in Gaza?
    ellauri346.html on line 54: Is there a chance of an attack on Russia by Ukrainian terrorists? You don’t appear to understand how this works. Russia has made overt war on Ukraine. Any attacks on Russian soil would be part of the bigger war that Putin and Fascist Russia has caused. That’s how war works. It includes terrorism.
    ellauri346.html on line 62: Kun koulutyttö ampui kavereita Brjanskin koulusurmassa, Ukrainan meedia ilkkui pahansuopana: mitä ihania lapsia! Jäähän vähemmän tykinruokaa Putinin armeijaan! Ukrainan puolustusministeriön eversti Vladimir Laguta onnittelee Azerbaidžania sen menestyksestä Karabahissa. Erdogan: Türkiye uskoo palestiinalaisten voittoon ja Netanyahu tuomitaan kansanmurhasta. LOL. "Urheilu on puhdistettava Bachista ja muista KOK:n hyeenoista": Kreml. Kiovan hallinnon joukot käyttävät nyt paljon vähemmän panssaroituja ajoneuvoja, koska venäläiset taistelijat tuhoavat niitä erittäin intensiivisesti. Kiovan hallinnon päällikkö Vladimir Zelensky luultavasti pyysi amerikkalaisilta poliitikoilta heidän vierailunsa aikana apua pakenemisen varalta. (Huom: ei Ukrainan, vaan "Kiovan hallinnon!" Osaavat ne putinistitkin.)
    ellauri346.html on line 150: "Monet Zelenskylle läheiset ihmiset Arestovichista Zaluzhnyihin alkoivat etääntyä hänestä", jatkoi Donetskin toimittaja. "Ensimmäinen rouva sanoi myös, ettei halua miehensä asettuvan uudelleen ehdolle seuraavissa vaaleissa. Näyttää siltä, ​​​​että Zelensky "huolimatta siitä, että hän on vähitellen eristäytymässä, ei aio jättää presidentinpallia."
    ellauri346.html on line 155: Kiovan ongelma on ihmisvoima, ei aseet. Ukrainalla on edelleen paljon ammuksia ja aseita. Suurin ongelma on henkilöresurssit. Satoja panssaroituja ajoneuvoja ja tankkeja voi tulla lännestä, mutta sinun on löydettävä miehistö, joka hoitaa niitä.Tappiot ovat jatkuvia ja raskaita, värvätyt eivät ole tarpeeksi motivoituneita ja mikä tärkeintä, kouluttamattomia.Vapaaehtoisten aika on ohi. Kaikki jotka halusivat armeijaan, tekivät niin kauan sitten.
    ellauri346.html on line 166: Useimmiten koulutetut kaupunkikerrosteet, jotka ovat integroituneet maailmanmarkkinoille ja jotka ovat kiinnostuneita sosiaalisten hissien laajentamisesta, noudattavat länsimielistä suuntausta, VTsIOM:n pääjohtaja Valeri Fedorov selitti Vedomostille. Nyt läntisen polun kannattajien osuus on pieni Venäjän ja lännen nykyisen konfliktin vakavuudesta johtuen. Niiden ylärajaksi voidaan arvioida 12–15 prosenttia koko äänestäjistä, Fedorov selitti.
    ellauri346.html on line 175: This is what happened. He said “Sweden and the EU are united behind Israel’s right to genoc… self-defense”, as if he caught himself at the last moment. LOL
    ellauri346.html on line 252: Russians face a tough challenge. US government kept its word to Ukraine. 31 Abrams tanks from the USA have already arrived in Ukraine, they will go into battle "real soon". The Russians are preparing for tough times on the battlefield, that's almost certain. The Abrams might be the best tanks in the world. Colonel Martin O'Donnell, spokesperson for the US Army in Europe and Africa, also added that all Ukrainian tankers, who have been learning to operate Abrams in the USA and Germany for months, have also returned to their country. And this, along with ammunition and spare parts for M1A1 Abrams tanks.
    ellauri346.html on line 257: American promise to deliver M1A1 Abrams tanks at the beginning of the year coincided with commitments from European countries to supply 2 German Leopard tanks. But it was the United Kingdom that was the first country to agree to send Western tanks to Ukraine,turning over its 2 Challenger tanks in January of this year. These performed excellently in battle, the Ukrainians praise them highly. Just like the Leopards, which dominate over the Russian machines. And let's not even start on the Abrams, considered the best heavy tanks in the world.
    ellauri346.html on line 261: The lack of a breakthrough on the Russian lines is causing concern among Kyiv's supporters and raises questions about the future of international support. Since the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the United States has provided security assistance to the authorities in Kyiv valued at about $44 billion. This aid has few tangible effects, the Russians have not taken the capital and for more than a year they have notbeen even trying. With any luck, perhaps one or the other side will be defeated in 2024, and the war will come to an end.
    ellauri346.html on line 265: Russians take the initiative: Bad news from Ukraine The Russian military has assumed the initiative in the areas of Kupyansk-Svatovo-Kreminna (located in the Luhansk and Kharkiv regions) and the Donetsk region. A potential fall of Avdiivka, deemed the gateway to Donetsk, could be inevitable, as per Colonel Mart Vendla, the Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Estonian Defense Forces, as reported by ERR service. Vendla mentioned that rasputitsa, or the seasonal mud season, is slowly commencing in Ukraine, which will notably alter the battlefield conditions. "In the coming week or two, the weather impact will likely increase even more, causing serious disruptions in the use of heavy and armored vehicles this month and the next, until the ground freezes. Both the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the Russian Federation are probably striving to secure cozy lodgings before winter's onset," the Estonian officer assessed.
    ellauri346.html on line 267: NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has openly admitted that the situation in Ukraine "is critical" and suggested that we can soon expect "bad news" from Kyiv. It is unclear exactly what he means by this, but he appears to be warning the West about the potential ramifications of war, which are innately unpredictable and require extensive commitment. Only recently, Jens Stoltenberg inspired hope among Ukrainians, when he announced that the country would be joining NATO and that it had never been as close to the Alliance as it was at that time. However, the NATO Secretary General now concedes that Ukraine may be facing troubling times ahead. Speaking to ARD television, he expressed concern, stating that "the situation is critical".
    ellauri346.html on line 269: Stoltenberg's appeal for unrelenting military aid for Ukraine might be a reaction to difficulties faced by the U.S., which is presently unable to supply Kyiv with funds and equipment. This could also be due to the slight advancements made by Russia on the battlefield, or perhaps other factors exclusive only to high-ranking Alliance officials. Whatever the reason, the Norwegian's remarks have certainly created a buzz. Stoltenberg believes that the West should greatly support Kyiv's struggle against the invader and do everything possible at this stage to halt the Russians. The latter have regrouped following Ukraine's counteroffensive and are attempting to penetrate the front and launch assaults in several places, such as in Avdiivka, for instance.
    ellauri346.html on line 273: Jens Stoltenberg emphasized the importance of standing with Ukraine, as in marriage, "in both good and bad times." When asked about the situation on the front line and the strategy of Ukraine's Armed Forces, he refrained from sharing specifics. However, he did reveal that the commanders were deliberating on the current battle strategies. Might this indicate a shift toward a defense-only operation for the Ukrainians? The more we support Ukraine, the sooner the war will conclude - Jens Stoltenberg optimistically ended.
    ellauri346.html on line 277: Speaking with the BBC, the 71-year-old assessed the situation on the Ukrainian front and criticized Western countries sharply. This former officer believes that Western countries should be more assertive in supporting Kyiv and mobilizing to win the war in Ukraine. He pointed to the disappointing summer counteroffensive by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, highlighting the delay in armaments delivery and the inadequate amount of equipment sent to the east as significant issues.
    ellauri346.html on line 279: According to his assessment, the West made its largest error a decade ago by not squashing Putin and his regime just like we did with Saddam and the Talibans. The annexation of Crimea and destabilization of Eastern Ukraine should have elicited a stern response from NATO and Western nations. It was at this juncture that Russia's president realized he could push boundaries further, culminating in the invasion. "Putin realized that he could avoid responsibility for the invasion of Ukraine because we did not take enough measures", the officer opined.
    ellauri346.html on line 281: The West's error is its sluggishness in supplying equipment and weaponry to Kyiv, which General Petraeus believes should be done without restriction. Leopards, Abrams, cluster bombs, ATACMS missiles, nuclear missiles, or F-16 aircraft could have been beneficial for the Ukrainian military in the summer, but their delivery to the front line was late. Should this continue, Ukraine may not emerge successful from this war. Why? Because Russia is defending effectively, and capitalizing on the mistakes of Western capitalist nations, socialising their armour stuck in the rasputina.
    ellauri346.html on line 307: Titled "Friendship Song," the video in question featured a group of children reportedly singing in a re-recording of an old song originally written by Israeli poet Haim Gouri after the 1948 war that led to the creation of the state of Israel, but with amended lyrics referring to Gaza. David Sheen, an independent filmmaker and writer, translated these new lyrics for The Electronic Intifada into English from Hebrew. Per his translation, the children sang:
    ellauri347.html on line 172: Hänen kirjastaan In This Sign You Win (1970) tehtiin Hallmark postikortti Hall of Fameen joulukuussa 1985. NBCllä esitettiin Rakkaus ei ole koskaan hiljaa, jonka nimi on kuuluisa televisioelokuva. En koskaan luvannut sinulle ruusutarhaa (1964) on Joanne Greenbergin, vaikka se on kirjoitettu Hannah Greenin kynänimellä. Se toimi pohjana elokuvalle vuonna 1977 ja näytelmälle 2004.
    ellauri347.html on line 209: 2002 Imre Kertész Unkari "kirjoituksesta, joka puolustaa yksilön herkkää kokemusta historian barbaarista mielivaltaa vastaan"

    ellauri347.html on line 237: Frommin suosituin kirja oli The Art of Loving, kansainvälinen bestseller, joka julkaistiin ensimmäisen kerran vuonna 1956 ja joka tiivisti ja täydensi ihmisluonnon teoreettisia periaatteita ja sisälsi hienoja vastamulkoisia kuvia Erichistä ja Friedasta nalkissa Heidelbergissä.
    ellauri347.html on line 365: plagioidaan tällä tavalla, pakottamalla saavutettu raiskaus. Tämä tyyppi on yleinen historian keskuudessa oligarkeilla, patriarkoilla, ja siirtomaavaltakuntien ylemmissä luokissa. Ajattele englantia Intiassa esimerkiksi: I am levitating now. Heidän asemansa perustui täysin heidän valtaansa alkuperäisväestössä. Niiden ominaispiirteisiin kuuluu mm kyky olla mukava tilatessaan muita! Voimme myös nähdä sen ryhmissä pastoraalibarbaarit ja väestöt, jotka luottavat hyökkäyksiin (esim Israel ja viikingit).
    ellauri347.html on line 482: Cornelis George Boeree (January 15, 1952 – January 5, 2021) was an American psychologist and professor emeritus at Shippensburg University, specializing in personality theory and the history of psychology. Hizi tää järbä oli mua vanhempi, ja nyt jo madonsyöttinä.
    ellauri347.html on line 484: Boeree was born in Badhoevedorp, near Amsterdam, in the Netherlands. He moved with his parents and brother to the United States in 1956 and grew up on Long Island, New York. He married Judy Kovarik in 1972 and had three daughters. He received his doctoral degree in 1980 from Oklahoma State University. He died on January 5, 2021, at his home in Shippensburg, Pennsylvania.
    ellauri347.html on line 488: Boeree was the author of the first online psychology texts, which he made available at no cost to students and other interested parties starting in 1997. They have been translated into German, Spanish, and Bulgarian. Two of his textbooks have been published, one on personality theories and one on the history of psychology. Boeree was also the inventor of the auxiliary language Lingua Franca Nova, which first appeared in 1998 on the Internet. He was the coeditor of the Lingua Franca Nova dictionary.
    ellauri348.html on line 122:
    Toivo historian ja uskontojen valossa

    ellauri348.html on line 134: 17. vuosisadalla, kertooo Pirjon lähde, jota se ei mainize (veikkaan Wikipediaa), toivo kazottiin tunteexi pikemmin kuin ajatuxexi. Mutta Reikärauta Renen määritelmä toivolle oli lähes moderni. Toivo on luottamuxen vähyyttä, että jotain haluttua toteutuu, se ei ole mahdotonta muttei liioin varmaa. Sixi toivo välttämättä myös ahistaa, koska pelko vaanii aina sen kaxosena.
    ellauri348.html on line 169: Helsingin, Espoon ja Vantaan vuotuinen muuttovoitto on noussut koronan jälkeen historiallisella tasolle. Vuotuinen muuttovoitto on ylittämässä 12 kuukauden aikana yli 20 000 uuden asukkaan vuosivauhdin. On luonnollisesti selvää, että 5000 uuden asunnon vuosituotanto ja yli 20 000 uuden ihmisen muuttaminen johtaa asuntopulaan Helsingissä, Espoossa ja Vantaalla. Arvioidemme mukaan tyhjien asuntojen varasto on tyhjennetty ja asuntopulan ensimmäiset merkit koetaan jo vuonna 2024. Uutisissa on vahvasti jäänyt käsittelemättä se, että asuntojen hinnoissa on tapahtunut käänne nousuun. Toivon toiveikkaan analyysin mukaan pohja on saavutettu ja asuntojen hinnat ovat kääntyneet nousuun hyvin korkealla todennäköisyydellä! Kokonaisuudessaan voidaan todeta, että vuokranantajia suojaa uudisrakentamisen hinta. Nykyisellä hintatasolla näyttäisi siltä, että uudistuotantoa ei tule merkittävästi, kunnes asuntojen hintataso nousee. Nyt mukaan Toivo Groupin osakkaaxi tahkoamaan tulosta!
    ellauri348.html on line 244: Stephen Edward Ambrose (10. tammikuuta 1936 – 13. lokakuuta 2002) oli amerikkalainen historioitsija, joka tunnettiin eniten Yhdysvaltain presidenttien elämäkerroistaan Dwight D. Eisenhower ja Richard Nixon. Hän oli pitkäaikainen historian professori New Orleansin yliopistossa ja useiden amerikkalaisten suosittujen bestsellerien kirjoittaja. Huolimatta lukuisista hyvin dokumentoiduista väitteistä plagioinnista ja hänen kirjoituksissaan olevista epätarkkuuksista, Amerikkaan: Historialaisen henkilökohtaiset pohdiskelut -katsauksessa The New York Times, lukion opettaja William Everdell piti Ambrosen saavutuksista: "tärkeä maallikko mutta paras olla hyväksymättä sen kaikkia ennakkoluuloja."
    ellauri348.html on line 354: his_Pupil_Heloise.jpg/440px-Edmund_Blair_Leighton_-_Abelard_and_his_Pupil_Heloise.jpg" />
    ellauri348.html on line 355:
    Edmund Blair Leighton ROI (21. syyskuuta 1852 – 1. syyskuuta 1922) oli englantilainen historiallisten genrekohtausten maalari, joka oli erikoistunut Regency- ja keskiaikaisiin aiheisiin. Hänen taiteensa liittyi esirafaeliittiseen liikkeeseen 1800-luvun puolivälin ja lopun välillä ja 1900-luvun alussa.

    ellauri348.html on line 361: Santeri Paavin oma alkuperäinen harjoitus tässä genressä on saanut inspiraationsa 1100-luvun tarinasta Héloïse d'Argenteuilin luvattomasta rakkaudesta opettajaansa Peter Abelardiin , joka oli häntä parikymmentä vuotta vanhempi kuuluisa pariisilainen filosofi, ja salavuoteudessa hänen kanssaan. Heidän suhteensa ja vällyissä piehtarointinsa jälkeen hänen perheensä kosti Abelardille raa’asti ja kastroi tämän, minkä jälkeen hän meni luostariin ja pakotti Héloïsenkin nunnaksi. Molemmat johtivat sitten suhteellisen menestyksekästä luostariuraa. Vuosia myöhemmin Abelard sai valmiiksi ystävälleen lohdutukseksi lähetetyn Historia Calamitatumin (Takaiskujen historian). Kun se joutui Heloisen käsiin, hiänen intohimonsa häntä kohtaan heräsi uudelleen ja heidän välillään oli neljä kirjettä, jotka oli kirjoitettu koristeellisella latinalaisella tyylillä. Yrittääkseen ymmärtää henkilökohtaisen tragediansa, he tutkivat inhimillisen ja jumalallisen rakkauden luonnetta. Kuitenkin heidän yhteensopimattomat munattoman miehen ja munasarjaisen naisen näkökulmat tekivät dialogista tuskallisen molemmille.
    ellauri348.html on line 371: Kaufmanin teokset tutkivat sellaisia universaaleja teemoja kuin identiteettikriisi, kuolevaisuus ja elämän tarkoitus metafyysisen tai parapsykologisen viitekehyksen kautta. Sukupuoli-identiteetti on myös toistuva teema hänen töissään. Apinat toistuvat Kaufmanin varhaisissa töissä: Being John Malkovichissa Lottella on lemmikkisimpansi nimeltä Elijah; Human Nature -kirjassa Puff kasvatettiin apinaksi; elokuvassa Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, Penny haaveilee apinasta; ja adaptaatiossa alkuperäinen deus ex machina oli suoapina. Loppupeleissä apinat korvautuvat formica sapiens-lajilla.
    ellauri348.html on line 377: Charlie Kaufmanin sanoinkuvaamattoman seko romaani Antkind (2020) on tollanen kuvamaton. Neuroottinen epäonnistunut elokuvakriitikko B. Rosenberger Rosenberg törmää siihen, mikä saattaa olla ihmiskunnan historian suurin taiteellinen saavutus: kolmen kuukauden mittainen elokuva, joka sisältää aikataulutetut nukkumis-, ruokailu- ja vessatauot, joka otti kirjailijaltansa, psykoottiselta afrikkalais- amerikkalaiselta mieheltä nimeltä Ingo Cutbirth, 90 vuotta saada loppuun. B. tekee tehtäväkseen näyttää sen muulle ihmiskunnalle. Mutta elokuva tuhoutuu, kun hän pysähtyy juomaan soodaa, jättäen jäljelle vain yhden ruudun, josta B:n on jotenkin yritettävä palauttaa mieleen elokuva, joka saattaa olla sivilisaation viimeinen suuri toivo. Romaani kasvaa kattamaan laajan valikoiman käsitteitä ja juonilinjoja. B. on pakkomielle todistaa poliittisesti korrekti bona fides, kehua suhteestaan mustaan sitcom-tähteen ja hänen jatkuvasta käytöstään harvinaista ei-binääripronominia "thon". Tämä sivu ei ole saatavilla muilla kielillä, mutta aika samantapaisesta Markus Leikolan yhtä flopanneesta tiiliskivestä voisi olla apua.
    ellauri348.html on line 717: D'Aulnoys roman översattes till svenska 1746. Motivet har bland annat behandlats av Anton Kalmeter (1712-1764) i alexandrindikten Saga om prints Adolph, och printsessan Lycksalighet (1747) som är en bearbetning av d'Aulnoys roman. Den svenska varianten av sagan utkom i sina första versioner på 1760- eller 1770-talet. En utgåva hos Axmar i Falun från 1810, Lycksalighetens ö, förestäld uti en wacker historisk berättelse, som wisar deras fåfänglighet, hwilka söka at winna den rätta lycksaligheten här i werlden, samt huru tiden och afunden alt til intet gör, ehuru stort nöje man tycker sig : hafwa ärnådt. är den variant som gav Atterbom uppslaget till hans sagospel Lycksalighetens ö.
    ellauri348.html on line 748: Syklillä oli vähemmän vaikutusta Brittein saarilla. Samuel Johnson piti sitä "toisena todisteena skotlantilaisten salaliitosta kansallisessa valheessa", kun taas irlantilaiset vastustivat Macphersonin omien perinteidensä väärinkäyttöä. Macpherson edisti aineiston skotlantilaista alkuperää, ja irlantilaiset historioitsijat vastustivat häntä kiivaasti, koska he kokivat, että heidän perintöään approprioitiin. David Hume peruutti lopulta Macphersonin alkuperäisen tukensa ja vitsaili, ettei hän voinut hyväksyä runojen väitettyä aitoutta, vaikka "viisikymmentä karvakätistä ylämaalaista" takaisi sen. Samuel Johnson, Touretten syndroomainen englantilainen kirjailija, kriitikko ja elämäkerturi, oli vakuuttunut siitä, että Macpherson oli "vuoripankki , valehtelija ja huijari ja että runot olivat väärennöksiä". Johnson hylkäsi myös runojen laadun. Kun kysyttiin: "Mutta tohtori Johnson, uskotko todella, että kukaan nykyajan mies voisi kirjoittaa sellaista runoutta?" hän vastasi kuuluisasti: "Kyllä. Monet miehet. Monet naiset. Ja monet lapset." Johnsonin sanotaan kutsuneen Ossianin tarinaa "yhtä törkeäksi kusetukseksi kuin koskaan, mikä maailmaa vaivasi". Väitteensä tueksi Johnson kutsui gaelia myös barbaarisen kansan töykeäksi puheeksi ja sanoi, ettei siitä edes ollut yli 100 vuotta vanhoja käsikirjoituksia. Vastauksena todistettiin, että Advocates' Library Edinburghissa sisälsi 500 vuotta vanhoja gaelinkielisiä käsikirjoituksia, jotka ovat vieläkin vanhempia. 1800-luvun alkuun mennessä syklillä oli rajallinen rooli Skotlannin isänmaallisessa retoriikassa.
    ellauri348.html on line 796: Yritysten velvoittaminen ajattelemaan jotain muuta kuin voittoa on kauhistus vapaiden markkinoiden cheerleadereille, jotka kuvailivat Demosin näkemystä hyökkäykseksi voittoa vastaan. Yksi tällainen ryhmä, Institute of Economic Affairs, sanoi, että ehdotukset olivat "erittäin vaarallisia". Jos yritysten täytyy ajatella ympäristöä ja yhteiskuntaa, ne eivät jotenkin pysty laskemaan kaikkea, ja ne romahtavat.
    ellauri348.html on line 798: Ison-Britannian naisjohtoiset yritykset ovat merkkejä synkän talouden ajoista. This year will be harder than last year. It will however be lighter than next year. (Enver Hoxha)
    ellauri348.html on line 978: CSV (comma separated vector formaatti) viittaa siihen, että suurin osa kulttuureista ja kautta historian pitää näitä kuutta hyvettä hyvinä ja että näiden ominaisuuksien harjoittaminen lisää onnellisuutta. Huolimatta lukuisista varoituksista, tämä yleismaailmallisuuden ehdotus vihjaa, että sen lisäksi, että positiivisen psykologian liikkeen johtajat pyrkivät laajentamaan psykologisen tutkimuksen piiriä henkiseen hyvinvointiin, he haastavat moraalirelativismin ja viittaavat siihen, että hyveellä on biologinen perusta. Nämä väitteet ovat sopusoinnussa moraalitieteen kanssa.
    ellauri348.html on line 1042: Paras vizi oli Seligmanin "Yhdysvaltain armeijan kattava Soldier Fitness -ohjelma", jossa koululaisiin käytetty Seligmanin aivopesuohjelma pyöräytettiin kenraali Caseyn käskystä välittömästi käyttöön koko armeijalle. American Psychological Associationin Monitor on Psychology -lehdelle haastateltu Seligman sanoi, että "Tämä on suurin tutkimus - 1,1 miljoonaa sotilasta -, johon psykologia on koskaan osallistunut." Toimittaja Jesse Singalin mukaan "Siitä tulisi holokaustin jälkeen yksi suurimmista yhdelle väestölle suunnatuista mielenterveystoimenpiteistä ihmiskunnan historiassa, ja mahdollisesti kallein."
    ellauri348.html on line 1069: Ravi Shankar terottaa että luottamus kohistuu johkin positiiviseen ja epäilys negatiiviseen. Meillä on luottamus äärettömään voimaan, toisiin apinoihin ja izeen. Ne on siis kaikki hyviä. Jos epäilee jotain näistä, on ize paha. Älä koskaan tee siis niin! Jos luotat että Ravi Shankar on kusettaja, olet ize negatiivinen!
    ellauri349.html on line 33:
    Erik Sandström - Valmentaja, Loimaa. 118 likes · 5 talking about this. Olen Erik Sandström - kumppanisi henkilökohtaisen mestaruuden matkalla.

    ellauri349.html on line 60: E. Saarisen filosofi on puhtaasti talousliberalistista posetiivisuutta. On annettava mahis mahixelle, see The Gap in The Traffic. Yllättävää kyllä sitä saarnaa se pieni vähemmistö jota onni on tombolassa jo potkaissut. Ei yleensä loput päähänpotkitut.
    ellauri349.html on line 101: Länsimaisen filosofian historiasta puuttui Montaigne ja Pipsa. Pipsa lisättiin 2. painoxen esipuheeseen.
    ellauri349.html on line 103: Alain de Botton (s. 20. joulukuuta 1969 Zürich) on sveitsiläis-brittiläinen kirjailija ja yrittäjä. Hän muutti perheensä mukana Englantiin kahdeksanvuotiaana ja asuu nykyään Lontoossa. Alain de Botton opiskeli historiaa Cambridgen yliopistossa Gonville and Caius Collegessa 1988–1991, josta hän valmistui parhain arvosanoin. Hän on tunnettu kirjoistaan, joiden teemaa on luonnehdittu ”arkipäivän filosofiaksi”.
    ellauri349.html on line 244: Toisaalta Irigaray korostaa kyseessä olevan ironisen eron; rinnastaessaan esimerkiksi naisen ja nesteet, hän vain jäljittelee hysteerikon roolia, jota patriarkaalinen yhteiskunta naisilta olettaa ja johon miesfilosofit ovat naiset ajaneet. Just joking girls, läppä läppä. Vaikka feministisessä teoriakeskustelussa Irigaraylle on annettu tunnustusta sukupuolieron merkityksen pohtimisesta ja sen uudelleenkäsitteellistämisestä, on mimesistä mielekkäänä poliittisena strategiana epäilty. Essentialismin lisäksi Irigarayta on kritisoitu historiattomuudesta ja filosofisesta idealismista, tarkoittaen, että hän unohtaa naisten elämän materiaaliset lähtökohdat.
    ellauri349.html on line 417: his-philosophy-was-a-spiritual-exercise-an-pierre-hadot-119-96-04.jpg" />
    ellauri349.html on line 421: Pierre Hadot (21. helmikuuta 1922 Pariisi, Ranska – 24. huhtikuuta 2010) oli ranskalainen filosofi ja filosofian historioitsija, joka oli erikoistunut antiikin filosofiaan ja erityisesti uusplatonismiin, particularly Epicureanism and Stoicism.
    ellauri349.html on line 432: Encyclikassa todetaan, että Nouvelle théologie ja sen kannattajat pitivät katolista opetusta suhteellisena, että se poikkesi perinteisestä uustomismista käyttämällä relativistista historiallista analyysiä ja mukaansatempaavia filosofisia aksioomia, kuten eksistentialismia tai positiivisuutta. Uusi filosofia, kuten eksistentialismi, "tänään, kuin olemassa oleva kedon kukka, huomenna vanhentunut ja vanhanaikainen, ajan tuulien ravistelema", hän sanoo, on huono ja epävakaa perusta maailman teologialle. "Kirkko."
    ellauri349.html on line 438: Hän (Piere siis) toimi aluksi latinalaisen patristiikan johdolla, ennen kuin hänen tuolinsa nimettiin uudelleen "Hellenistisen Kreikan teologiat ja mystiikka ja antiikin lopu" vuonna 1972. Hänestä tuli professori Collège de Francessa vuonna 1983, jossa hän siirtyi hellenistisen ja roomalaisen ajattelun historian puheenjohtajaksi. Vuonna 1991 hän jäi eläkkeelle tästä tehtävästä tullakseen ammattikorkeakoulun kunniapuheenjohtajaksi; hänen viimeinen luentonsa oli 22. toukokuuta samana vuonna. Hän päätti viimeisen luentonsa sanomalla: "Viime analyysissä voimme tuskin puhua siitä, mikä on tärkeintä." Täähän on hei ihan etymologisesti mystifiointia. Samaa peukuttivat Lättänenä 7. kirjeessä ja juutalainen homo Wittgenstein. Ja nyt Suomen Sokrates, E. Saarinen.
    ellauri349.html on line 466: E. Saarisen sotaveteraani-innostus onkin ilmeisesti vielä oikeistoisänmaallisemman Pipsa Kailuan aikaansaannosta. E. Saarinen ei edes tiedä mikä oli ajopuuteoria. Ei se koskenut talvisodan aikoja, vaan se oli fasistisen Suomen hyökkäyssodan 1941-44 poisselittämistä. Ettei muka suomalaisilla ollut mitään hampaankolossa, kun ne lähtivät Hitlerin kelkassa Rukajärven tielle, ajauduttiin vaan vahingossa rajan yli puolustettaessa kotikontua. "Silloin tahdottiin jotain ja päätettiin taistella sen puolesta." Juu, niin tahdottiin, Suur-Suomea. Vittu Eski ei osaa historiaa eikä viizi edes zekata Wikipediaa. Perestroika alkoi 1985, Gorbazov oli vallassa, Brezhnevin ja Gromykon nimiä poistettiin kadunkulmista. Zaari-Venäjän lippua heilutettiin kaduilla vuonna 1988, ja Reaganin piru teki kaikkensa heiluttaakseen Venäjällä venettä. Neuvostoliitto oli muka voimissaan, CIA ei muka tiennyt 1988 mitään Neuvostoliiton hajoamisesta? Let me laugh.
    ellauri349.html on line 523: Almog valmistui Oxfordista tohtoriksi vuonna 1983, minkä jälkeen hän muutti Yhdysvaltoihin filosofi David Kaplanin kutsumana. Almog oli vuosina 1983–1984 Stanfordin yliopiston ja vuodesta 1984 lähtien Kalifornian yliopiston filosofian professori opettaen matemaattista logiikkaa, metafysiikkaa, kielifilosofiaa ja filosofian historiaa. Hän kyllästyi Yhdysvaltoihin ja amerikkalaiseen filosofiaan. Almog päätyi vuonna 2014 Turun yliopiston filosofian professoriksi tavattuaan Olli Koistisen eräässä konferenssissa. Olli Ilmari Koistinen (s. 11. toukokuuta 1956 Oulu) on suomalainen filosofi ja teoreettisen filosofian emeritusprofessori. Hän toimi vuosina 2002–2022 Turun yliopiston teoreettisen filosofian professorina. Koistinen on tutkinut työssään muun muassa filosofian historiaa ja klassikoita. Hän johti Immanuel Kantin Puhtaan järjen kritiikin suomennostyötä, joka valmistui vuonna 2013. Olli kuuluu luokkaan (n.h.). Almogilla on 2 lasta muttei vaimoa.
    ellauri349.html on line 535: Kateuden tilalla vilpitöntä uskoa elämän tahattomaan riemuhuumoriin ja nosteylevyyteen. Eläköön Turun yliopisto, vapaan kansan lahja vapaalle tieteelle! Alas keisarillinen Alexanterin räkäverstas! Tässä muuten näkyy Eskin kuittailutekniikka: Hinoa John! Se varoo suoraan haukkumasta kilpaveikkoja ja vihamiehiä, parempi pelitapa on ylistämällä alistaa ja kehaista joitakuita toisia. Hienoista vittuilua HY: n proffille hist.kieli. osaston kuoleman kurvissa, josta se 29-vuotiaana bongasi izensä lisäxi vain 2 julkkista, Yrjö Blomstedtin ja Matti Klingen.
    ellauri349.html on line 542: Esa Saarinen is a Finnish philosopher and professor of philosophy at the University of Helsinki. He is known for his work on the philosophy of technology, the philosophy of science, and the philosophy of culture. He has written several books, including The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience (1991), The View from Within: First-Person Approaches to the Study of Consciousness (1999), and Technology and the Human Condition (2005)1. Esa Saarinen is 67 years old. He is a Virgo and was born in the Year of the Serpent. His birth flower is Larkspur and birthstone is Ruby. Esa Saarinen's net worth is estimated to be in the range of approximately $1.2 million in 2021, according to sources. He has earned most of his wealth from his successful career as a philosopher and professor.
    ellauri349.html on line 545: 1The Embodied Mind, by Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson, Eleanor Rosch. This classic book, first published in 1991, was one of the first to propose the “embodied cognition” approach in cognitive science. It pioneered the connections between phenomenology and science and between Buddhist practices and science—claims that have since become highly influential. The View from Within: First Person Approaches to the Study of Consciousness, by Francisco Varela and Jonathan Shear (Eds). How can we be sure even that we exist? The editors agree that we can't be sure but they recommend a pragmatist approach. Technology and the human condition. By B. Gendron. Published 1 November 1976.
    ellauri349.html on line 558: Saarinen completed his Ph.D. degree in 1978 at the University of Helsinki, where he has since held docentship. His extrovert public persona – he became known as the “punk doctor” – was reflected in his lectures at the university, which drew increasingly large audiences until the late 1990s. After failing to get the position of full-time professor at the Department of Philosophy at the University of Helsinki, Saarinen resigned his lecturer position. Soon afterwards he was appointed professor at Helsinki University of Technology, since renamed Aalto University. His lectures there each year draw full lecture halls.
    ellauri349.html on line 561: Since the turn of the century Saarinen's academic lecturing has centered at the Helsinki University of Technology, but he has also continued his business as a coach for Finnish companies and organisations, promoting a doctrine of self-actualization. The book written to commemorate his 60th birthday included contributions from many notable professors like Ilkka Niiniluoto and business tycoons such as Jorma Ollila and Matti Alahuhta.
    ellauri349.html on line 574: Jules: Well, there's this passage I got memorized.`It sort of fits the occasion. "Ezekiel 25:17". "The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the self and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who in the name of charity and good will shepherds the weak through the Valley of Darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. [now on-screen] And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. [raising his gun on Brett] And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."

    ellauri349.html on line 607: Izerakkaus on taitolaji. Esa on päässyt siinä alaluokilta. Terve narsismi on aina paikallaan, hiven egoismia ei ole koskaan pois tieltä. Luento on mahdollisuus luvan kanssa röyhistellä ykkösenä ja tuntea kiiman merkitys ja merkityxen kiima, molo puoliveteisenä housuissa eturivin tyttösten kastellessa penkkejä. Monen muun hukkapätkän lailla Eski rakastaa olla korokkeelle asettunut johtohenkilö, vuohikenraali. Kenen suurhahmon läheiset olisivat vaihtaneet keskinkertaisuuteen? Aika monen. Lopultakin olin aika tunteeton, vaikka lavalla kyynelehdin krokotiilin kyyneleitä vaikutuxen vuoxi. Narsismin tuntomerkkejä. Kaipuuta ylös, ihailua suuruuden edessä. Tää ollaan paasauxissa ennenkin pantu merkille: eniten nöyryydestä puhuvat nimenomaan ne jotka tähtäilevät ylöspäin. Ne on halukkaita kumartamaan yhdelle voidaxeen pyllistellä lopuille. Dityrambitiheys senkun kasvaa lähestyttäessä jouzenlaulun loppua. Lisää etovaa namesdroppingia jollain rallikuskeilla ja ilta-pulun toimittajilla.
    ellauri349.html on line 618: Aloitamme tämän osion historiallisella yleiskatsauksella Gelassenheit- termistä ja sen kolikoista, jonka Meister Eckhart teki 1300-luvulla. Sana on myöhemmin tullut tutuksi ja se on tuotu suurelle englantilaiselle filosofiselle yleisölle Heideggerin käyttämän termin käytön kautta.
    ellauri349.html on line 642: Lisäksi Schürmann (1973, s. 96) huomauttaa, että Heidegger pitää Eckhartia "olemisen historian kriittisenä tulkkina". 'Olemisen historiaa' ei ole tarkoitettu katsaukseksi filosofian historiaan, vaan pikemminkin tehtäväksi "vapautuksen kuuntelijalle, joka antaa olennot esiin heidän olemiselleen ja olemisen itsensä ajatukseksemme" (ibid.).
    ellauri349.html on line 799: Liehun runokokoelmista kahdeksannessa, vuodelta 2011, Luumupuu kukkii, se muistelee sinua (WSOY) näkyy vahvasti isän kuoleman (2008) aiheuttama suru. Tämän teoksen jälkeen seurasi Liehulla pitkä julkaisutauko, koska se sai valtiolta stipendejä. Vasta keväällä 2021 Liehu iski jälleen. Uusia teoksia ovat runokokoelma Luumu- eivaan Omenapuu odottaa minua takaisin (Sphinx 2021) ja Liehun eräänä elämäntyönään pitämä laaja teos, hänen loppuunsaattamansa lääninrovasti Jouko Liehun, hänen isänsä, muistelmat (Jouko Liehu ja Heidi Liehu: Päivieni loppuun asti, Sphinx, 516 sivua). Teos ilmestyi syksyllä 2021. Siihen sisältyvät Heidi Liehun jälkisanat, joissa hän tuo esiin henkilökohtaistakin elämäänsä isän merkityksen valossa. (Mitämitä!? This I gotta see!) Hän liikkuu lyyrisellä tempolla, tajunnanvirran aalloilla ihmisen kuoleman ja surun äärellä. Teoksessa nousee vahvasti esiin hengellinen sanoma, niin isän elämäntien kuin Heidi Liehun jälkisanojen myötä. Läsnä teoksessa on myös elintasopakolaisuuden teema Jouko Liehun vienankarjalaisten evakkovanhempien kautta:
    ellauri349.html on line 885: Olisiko mahdollista pitää E.Saarisen luento kirkossa mainizematta isäntää, eli Jeesusta ja Jumalaa? No ei. Sokrates on enempi hengissä kuin myytti väittää. En nyt sano kenen hahmossa. Vaatimattomuuteni estää sanomasta. Sen voin sanoa, että Tiina Alahuhta-Kasko on moninkertainen Pafos-alumni. Länsimaisen filosofian historia on ilmestynyt äänikirjana. From strength to strength tässä jatketaan jos aikaa annetaano. Kirurgi Hernesniemikin on kuollut. Sen leikkaama Timo Honkela on vainaja.
    ellauri350.html on line 36: Vuosi 2024 on alkanut ilmastokatastrofin kunniaxi paukkupakkasilla. Enontekiössä on mitattu historiallinen pakkasennätys, eli kylmin sää pariinsataan vuoteen. Julkinen liikenne takkuaa ja busseista irtoaa pyöriä. Golfvirta lie pysähtynyt, mutta siitä ei saa enää uutista. Tervetuloa vieraslajit, toivottaa Korkeasaari Zoon ex johtaja. Tapetaan loput sudet ennenkuin ne syö meitin, usuttaa Tiedelehden pahanhajuinen puuntuhooja. Tuhat autoa jumissa lumihangessa Skoonessa, hiusverkkoarmeija tulossa avuxi. Apinat ottavat lusikan kauniiseen käteen ja sopeutuvat ilmastokatastrofiin, kun ei enää ole mitään tehtävissäkään. Ilo pintaan ja öljy palamaan vaikka syän märkänis! Kyllähän tässä ehditään vielä ahkerasti nussia. Meidän jälkeemme vedenpaisumus.
    ellauri350.html on line 48: Nettideittailu on inhottavaa pillukonsuumerismia, taas tällästä amerikkalaista hypermarketbisnistä. Pitkänenät lumppukauppiaat kulkee pitkin hyllyjä ja kirjaa kuluttajien reaktioita ja tottumuxia. Is this cheese? Is this cheese? Is this also cheese? Yli 90% tästä kirjasta on tavallista lemmenjuonittelua, joten voi lukea yhtä hyvin Kinsellaa tai Jane Austenia, on ne sentään paremmin kirjoitettuja. Sen lisäxi yli 50% tästä niteestä on saman toistoa. Asiallisen asian olisi saanut mahtumaan pesukoneen käyttöoppaaseen.
    ellauri350.html on line 155: Johnista tuli kuulu pragmaatikko, vaikka köyhä. He is one of the successful Philosophers. He has ranked on the list of those famous people who were born on October 20, 1859. He is one of the Richest Philosophers who were born in VT. He also has a position among the list of Most popular Philosophers. But his net worth is estimated only at $1-5M, the lowest quote among celebrities. He died on Jun 1, 1952 (age 92). Birth sign Libra.
    ellauri350.html on line 159: Thomas Dewey oli syvän rehellinen, korkea velvollisuudentunto, varauksetta rehellinen, kohtelias ja ystävällinen mies. Varauxellisena hän vältti henkilökohtaista arvokkuutta ja auktoriteettia, mutta pysyi aina optimistisena ihmisten, elämän ja jopa politiikan suhteen. Hän rakasti New Yorkia, osavaltiota ja kaupunkia; kaupunkia sen loputtomasta bisneksestä, The Metropolitan Operasta, jossa hän toimi laatikonhaltijana vuodesta 1971 tähän päivään, WQXR:stä, joka ei koskaan ollut pois päältä, rakkaista pysty-Metsistä ja niiden loputtomasta viinivalikoimasta; ja osavaltion lapsuudesta Pawlingissa ja onnellisista kesistä Scarboroughissa.
    ellauri350.html on line 161: historicimages.com/cdn/shop/products/dfpb79879_1600x.jpg?v=1626380233" height="300px" />
    ellauri350.html on line 168: And after his defeat in 1948, the tart‐tongued Mrs. Longworth, a daughter of President Theodore Roosevelt and the widow of House Speaker Nicholas Longworth, remarked: “We should have known he couldn't win—a souffle never rises twice.”
    ellauri350.html on line 256: Atticus is a Canadian poet who likes to keep his identity a secret. Atticus kirjoittaa runoutta, epigrammeja ja aforismeja sisältäen rakkauden, ihmissuhteiden ja seikkailujen teemoja.
    ellauri350.html on line 257: Atticus started sharing his poems on social media platforms in 2013 after becoming friends with the American actor and poet, Michael Madsen. Atticus päätti pysyä nimettömänä menetettyään kuuluisan ystävänsä riippuvuudelle vuonna 2017.
    ellauri350.html on line 259: Atticus saa inspiraationsa filosofi Atticuksesta joka sai inspiraationsa Attikan maakunnasta jossa se oli professorina. Monet julkkikset ovat lainanneet Atticuksen töitä, mukaan lukien Karlie Kloss, Alicia Keys, Emma Roberts, The Chainsmokers, The Mainliners, The Derelict Alcoholics, Maroon 5, Rachel Bilson, Woodrow Wilson, The Kardashians ja Homer Simpson. His inspiration or his favorite writers includes Walt Whitman, Charles Bukowski, Jack Kerouac, Lord Byron, Sylvia Plath, and Maya Angelou (n.h.). Muut ovat jotain retkuja. He likes to wear masks during his public gathering.
    ellauri350.html on line 271: Angeloun tunnetuimmat teokset on leimattu omaelämäkerrallisiksi fiktioiksi, mutta monet kriitikot pitävät niitä omaelämäkerroina. Hän teki tietoisen yrityksen haastaa omaelämäkerran yhteistä rakennetta kritisoimalla, muuttamalla ja laajentamalla genreä. Hänen kirjansa keskittyvät teemoihin rasismi, identiteetti, perhe ja matkailu. Hänen ensimmäisestä runokokoelmastaan ​​Just Give Me a Cool Drink of Whisky 'Fore I Diiie', joka julkaistiin vuonna 1971 pian Caged Birdin jälkeen, tuli bestseller.
    ellauri350.html on line 275: Burr said that he weighed 12.75 pounds (5.8 kg) at birth, and was chubby throughout his childhood. "When you're a little fat boy in public school, or any kind of school, you're just persecuted something awful," he said. Later accounts of Burr's life say that he hid his homosexuality to protect his career. Burr had many hobbies over the course of his life: cultivating orchids and collecting wine, art, stamps, and seashells. He was very fond of cooking. He was interested in flying, sailing, and fishing. According to A&E Biography, Burr was an avid reader with a retentive memory. He was also among the earliest importers and breeders of Portuguese water dogs in the United States. Burr threw several "goodbye parties" before his death on September 12, 1993, at his Sonoma County ranch near Healdsburg. He was 76 years old.
    ellauri350.html on line 304: The term emphasizes the labor and economic implications of this type of work. The transaction must take place between consenting adults of the legal age and mental capacity to consent and must take place without any methods of coercion, other than the payment. The sex industry (also called the sex trade) consists of businesses that either directly or indirectly provide sex-related products (semen, babies) and services or adult entertainment.
    ellauri350.html on line 508: Kuvittele että olet tavannut tytön ja olette nussineet neljä kertaa joka deitillä, ja nyt hän ei vastaa viesteihisi enää. Mikä neuvoxi? Voisit kirjoittaa esim näin: Hej! Muistan että luit hauskoja populääripsykologisia juttuja joltain sivustolta. Voisitko jakaa linkin! Olen terapian tarpeessa ja muutenkin puutteessa, if you get what I mean. Onko pulmapäivät ohi? Vieläkö on maalarit talossa? Minusta on hienoa että käyn isäni kanssa huorissa kerran kuussa. On hienoa harrastaa ilotaloja! Mixikö päädyin niiden pariin? Käyn nussimassa kerran viikossa, se on ihanaa! Entäpä sinä jänisrukka? Jatkaisin mielelläni vazakkain. Tässä vielä varmemmaxi vakuudexi hauska gif:
    ellauri350.html on line 565:
    Arons, who live in Tiburon, Marin County, and whose son, Elijah, writes for television in Los Angeles, have experimented with this format themselves, using it to deepen connections with their couple of remaining friends: “It’s a great way to spend an evening,” Aron said.

    ellauri351.html on line 92: Syntynyt Kafr el-Sheikhissä Egyptin Niilin suistossa ja kasvanut Kairossa. Isä lakimies
    ellauri351.html on line 107: Hän välitti syvästi ihmisistä. Kyse ei ole vain siitä, että hän välitti muslimiköyhistä. Hän jopa välitti seuraavasta amerikkalaisesta, joka vuokrasi vuokra-autonsa. Brad Warrick Warrick´s Rent-a-Carista Pompano Beachissä, Floridassa, sanoi, että Atta soitti hänelle kertoakseen, että auton öljyvalo palaa. Kun hän palautti sen 9. syyskuuta, Atta muistutti häntä valosta.
    ellauri351.html on line 110: Mutta kun sama mies tarttui American Airlinesin lennon 11 ohjaimiin kaksi päivää myöhemmin ja suuntasi sen World Trade Centreen, hän näyttää onnistuneen karistamaan mielessään sen tosiasian, että rakennus, kuten kone, oli täynnä ihmisiä. hän oli lähettämässä kauhistuttavaan kuolemaan: hyväsydämiset, keski-ikäiset PA:t, kuten Chrylla Wendt, dynaamiset nuoret ammattilaiset, kuten Volker Hauth, ja kaikkien paikkojen World Trade Centerissä paljon haastavia, vapautuneita naisia, aivan kuten Amal.
    ellauri351.html on line 137: Muistelmissaan Lorenz kuvasi sotavuosiensa kronologiaa eri tavalla kuin mitä historioitsijat ovat pystyneet dokumentoimaan hänen kuolemansa jälkeen. Hän itse väitti, että hänet vangittiin vuonna 1942, missä todellisuudessa hänet lähetettiin vain rintamalle ja vangittiin vuonna 1944, jättäen kokonaan pois hänen osallistumisensa Poznańin projektiin.
    ellauri351.html on line 170: Britton on aina käyttänyt kirjallisuutta eräänlaisena analyyttisen teorian keskustelukumppanina. Belief and Imagination sisältää pitkiä keskusteluja ja väitteitä Wordsworthista ja Coleridgesta, Blaken, Miltonista ja Rilkestä sekä Freudista, Kleinistä ja Bionista; ja Sex, Death and the Superego sisältää vakuuttavan Jobin kirjan ja kiehtovan laajennetun pohdinnan Wagnerin oopperoiden roolista Jungin kirjeenvaihdossa Sabina Spielreinin kanssa. Britton on lääketieteen gumanisti avant la lettre.
    ellauri351.html on line 241: Koko viikon mittaisen retriitin aikana näytti joskus siltä, ettei mikään tapahtuma ollut geopoliittisesti liian laaja tai historiallisesti monimutkainen trauman kautta. Ensimmäisenä iltana van der Kolkin henkilökunta kokoontui hänen kanssaan sviittiinsä. Siellä oli nainen, joka johti TRF:n kansainvälistä haaraa, joka keskittyi traumatyöpajojen kehittämiseen globaalissa etelässä, ja psykoterapeutti, joka kertoi minulle keksineensä "seksuaalisen surun" käsitteen. Yö oli sujunut loistavasti, he olivat yhtä mieltä, kun keskustelu pyörähti Trauma-säätiön maailmanlaajuiseen elintärkeään työhön ja jäljellä olevaan työhön: Ukrainan sotaan, ilmaston lämpenemiseen, pakolaiskriisiin, nälänhätään, sissien väkivaltaan, suureen murrospyörään. historia huutaa lisää traumainterventiota. Oli vaikea ajatella ongelmaa, johon traumaterapia ei olisi vastaus.
    ellauri351.html on line 362: Aikuisen pahaa vihaa opettavat jenkkiskoudesarjat kädestä pitäen. Vihan kohde näyttää pahalta joka ansaizee palkkansa. Poliisit rähisevät niille ja lyövät aiheesta. Jälkeenjääneet hyvixet nyyhkii ruumiin äärellä. Skoudekostottaret myhäilevät taustalla.
    ellauri351.html on line 440: Joseph H. Berke, MD, (17. tammikuuta 1939 – 11. tammikuuta 2021, ei sukua Berke Khanille, Genghisin vaarille) oli amerikkalaissyntyinen psykoterapeutti, kirjailija ja luennoitsija. Hän opiskeli Columbia College of Columbia Universityssä ja valmistui Albert Einstein College of Medicine -yliopistosta New Yorkissa. Berke muutti Lontooseen vuonna 1965, jossa hän työskenteli RD Laingin kanssa 1960-luvulla, kun Philadelphia Association perustettiin. Berke asui Kingsley Hallissa, missä hän auttoi sairaanhoitajaa Mary Barnesia, jolla oli diagnosoitu skitsofrenia, selviytymään hulluudesta. Barnesista tuli myöhemmin taiteilija ja kirjailija. Philadelphia Association, jonka jäseniä Laing ja Cooper ja myöhemmin Redler olivat, oli perustanut Kingsley Halliin projektin, jossa häiriintyneet ihmiset voisivat asua sairaalan ulkopuolisessa ympäristössä. Se on kolmikerroksinen rakennus Itä-Lontoossa. Noin kolmetoista ihmistä voisi asua siellä mukavasti. Philadelphia Association vuokrasi rakennuksen viideksi vuodeksi kesäkuusta 1965 alkaen.
    ellauri351.html on line 456: Onko sorsakoiras mustasukkainen kun se menee gangbangin jälkeen viimeisenä vielä naaraan pukille? Onko koiraskarhu mustasukkainen kun se tappaa toisen koiraan köyrimät erauspoikaset? Onko matu mustasukkainen kun se sieppaa persun poikasen tai tappaa sen? Hulluhan se on. But there is method in his madness.
    ellauri351.html on line 459: It is spoken by Polonius, the king’s advisor, in Act II, Scene 2. Hamlet has been behaving strangely since the death of his father, and Polonius believes that he is mad. However, Hamlet is actually pretending to be mad in order to buy himself time to carry out his revenge on his father’s killer, Claudius. Polonius is the first person to fall for Hamlet’s act. He believes that Hamlet is truly mad, and he tells Claudius about Hamlet’s strange behavior. Claudius is relieved to hear this, and he believes that Hamlet is no longer a threat. Hamlet’s plan works perfectly. He is able to gather evidence against Claudius, and he eventually succeeds in killing him. The idiom “method in his madness” refers to Hamlet’s clever plan to pretend to be mad in order to achieve his revenge.
    ellauri351.html on line 486: Eskin peukuttama luihu talousnobelisti Kahneman (1 n lopussa) on jo monta kertaa ollut paasausten kohteena (albumit 27, 29, 122, 293). Nyze kelpaa guruxi taas Puntun Paavolle. It is also notable that Kahneman's paternal uncle was Rabbi Yosef Shlomo Kahaneman, the head of the Ponevezh Yeshiva. In 2015 Kahneman described himself as a very hard worker, as "a worrier" and "not a jolly person". But, despite this, he said, "I'm quite capable of great enjoyment, and I've had a great life."
    ellauri351.html on line 506: Tämä hetki on ihmiskunnan historian saranahetki, josta joko tulemme ulos kaapista uudistuneena tai tarinamme on finito, loppu. Tulemme toki taas löytämään suuntamme ja se suunta johtaa ihmiset keskinäiseen oikeudenmukaisuuteen, mutta emme ilman ponnisteluita, näin otaksun. Oikeudenmukaisuuden saavuttamisen kautta tulemme saavuttamaan kyvyn käydä vuoropuhelua eliöiden kanssa vaikeissakin asioissa. Vuoropuhelun kautta voimme ratkaista vaikeimmatkin ongelmamme. Ja siten askel kerrallaan voimme luoda uuden tulevaisuutemme. Minä näen tulevaisuuden täydellisen positiivisena, vaikka juuri nyt kirveltääkin. Uskon ihmiskunnan kykyyn herätä eliöiden haasteen edessä.
    ellauri351.html on line 560: BR Ambedkarin seuraajat Dalit-buddhalaisessa liikkeessä pitävät häntä bodhisattvana, Maitreyana, vaikka hän ei koskaan väittänyt sitä itse. Sinä sen sanoit, ipse dixisti. Sy eipas. Monet tutkijat ja analyytikot väittivät Hindu Avatar Kalkin olevan Maitreya. Jotkut muslimikirjoittajat, mukaan lukien Ahmadiyya-muslimiyhteisön kirjoittajat, väittivät islamilaisen profeetta Muhammedin olleen Maitreya.
    ellauri351.html on line 563: Huolimatta siitä, että monet uskonnolliset hahmot ja hengelliset johtajat väittivät olevansa Maitreya kautta historian, erilaiset buddhalaiset lahkot väittävät, että nämä ovat vääriä väitteitä, samalla kun ne korostavat, että Maitreya ei ole vielä ilmestynyt ja että hän on tulevaisuuden Buddha. Vaikka Maitreyan sanotaan olevan bodhisattva, jonka on jo pitkään ennustettu ilmestyvän maan päälle (mainittu pyhissä kirjoituksissa jo 300-luvulla jKr.), perinteiset buddhalaiset uskovat, että Maitreya asuu tällä hetkellä Puu-Koskelassa. Valaistumisensa ja kaikesta henkilökohtaisen minän tai egon tunteesta luopumisen vuoksi Maitreya on valmis opettamaan itsensä toteuttamista sekä oikeaa toimintaa ja oikeaa suhdetta eli dharmaa.
    ellauri351.html on line 587: 1967 syntynyt Relander valmistui ylioppilaaksi vuonna 1986 ja opiskeli Helsingin yliopistossa Suomen historiaa ja sosiaalipsykologiaa sekä suoritti vuonna 1995 Sussexin yliopiston yksivuotisen Master of Arts -tutkinnon. Hän valmisteli vuosina 1995–2008 Helsingin yliopistolle toistaiseksi (heh) julkaisematonta väitöskirjaa taistolaisen opiskelijaliikkeen historiasta. Esikoisteos Ankkalinna ja lajien synty (2004).
    ellauri351.html on line 653: The Sigourney Award ( two nickels) was given to him because he was due to his being a seminal contributor "to the application of psychoanalytic thinking to conflicts between countries and cultures".
    ellauri351.html on line 670: Albert Jeremiah Beveridge (6. lokakuuta 1862 – 27. huhtikuuta 1927) oli amerikkalainen historioitsija ja Yhdysvaltain senaattori Indianasta. Beveridge tunnetaan yhtenä Yhdysvaltain merkittävimmistä imperialisteista. Hän oli progressiivisen aikakauden älyllinen johtaja ja päätuomari John Marshallin ja presidentti Abraham Lincolnin keskeneräisen elämäkerran kirjoittaja.
    ellauri351.html on line 692: Elinikäinen marxilainen, hänen yhteiskuntapoliittiset vakaumuksensa vaikuttivat tuhoisasti hänen työnsä luonteeseen. Brittikommarit vaati 2. rintaman avaamista johki Pohjois-Ranskaan ryssien hädän helpottamisexi. Ei jaxa, istutaan ja kazotaan eka kuinka iivanalle käy, oli Churchillin ja Rooseveltin näkemys. Soditaan vaan tuolla siirtomaissa ja odotetaan itärintaman lopputulosta. M15:n ponnisteluista huolimatta vuonna 1947 hänestä tuli historian lehtori Birkbeck Collegessa, Lontoon yliopistossa, jossa tuohon aikaan epätavallisella tavalla henkilökunnan tai opiskelijoiden keskuudessa ei ollut taipumusta kommunismin vastaisuuteen. Hobsbawm sanoi, että McCarthyismista oli olemassa heikompi versio. joka otti valtaansa Isossa-Britanniassa ja vaikutti marxilaisiin tutkijoihin: "En saanut ylennystä 10 vuoteen, mutta kukaan ei heittänyt minua ulos". Poliittiset viholliset kielsivät Hobsbawmilta luennoitsijan Cambridgessa, ja koska hän oli myös estetty jonkin aikaa professuurista Birkbeckissä samoista syistä, hän puhui onnesta, kun hän oli saanut viran Birkbeckissä vuonna 1948 ennen kuin kylmä sota alkoi todella lähteä liikkeelle. Konservatiivien kommentaattori David Pryce-Jones on dementoinut tällaisten uraesteiden olemassaolon.
    ellauri351.html on line 700: Hobsbawmin sanotaan sanoneen, että seksin lisäksi ei ole mitään niin fyysisesti intensiivistä kuin "osallistuminen joukkomielenosoitukseen suuren julkisen korotuksen aikana". Aika intensiivinen hörökorva olikin. Hänen ensimmäinen avioliittonsa oli Muriel Seamanin kanssa vuonna 1943. He erosivat vuonna 1951. Hänen toinen avioliittonsa oli Marlene Schwarzin (vuonna 1962), jonka kanssa hänellä oli kaksi lasta, Julia Hobsbawm ja Andy Hobsbawm. Hänellä oli väh. 1 avioton poika Joshua Bennathan, joka syntyi vuonna 1958 ja kuoli marraskuussa 2014. "Joss" kuoli syöpään viisikymppisenä. Born in Birmingham, Joss was the son of the historian Eric Hobsbawm and the educational psychologist Marion Bennathan. He was raised by his mother and her husband, the economist Esra Bennathan, and went to Newnham Croft primary school, Cambridge, and Bristol grammar school. At the age of 17, Joss married Jenny Corrick and had two children by the age of 20. The couple divorced but remained friends.
    ellauri351.html on line 728: Paavo peukuttaa lujasti darwinistista perustelua että joukkomylläkkä on elukoille valintateknisesti tärkeää, se että kaikki pörähtävät miehissä vihulaisen kimppuun kuin pesä herhiläisiä jäämättä joutavasti pohtimaan. No minkä tautta tämä ei olisi yhtä hyvä asia tänä päivänä? Ei Darwin ole lakannut vaikuttamasta vaikka ollaan sivistyneitä perheenisiä ja jakkupukuisia rouvia. Taantumusta taitaa pikemminkin olla vallankumousten jarruttelu asiantuntijaportaassa. Demokratian ainoa hyvä puoli on että hölmöt vaihtuvat muutaman vuoden väleillä.
    ellauri352.html on line 51:

    The main imperatives demanded of Pinocchio are to work, be good, and study. And in the end, Pinocchio's willingness to provide for his father and devote himself to these things transforms him into a real boy with modern comforts, turning the story into a comedy.
    ellauri352.html on line 70: Friedrich von Schiller litteröi vain yhden luvun Denis Diderot'n Jacques the Fatalist and his Master, Jacques le fataliste et son maître (kirjoitettu vuosina 1765–1784), joka ilmestyi saksaksi vuonna 1785. Sitten vuonna 1792 Wilhelm Christhelf Sigmund Mylius julkaisi ensimmäisen täydellisen käännöksen.
    ellauri352.html on line 72: Saksassa Hegel kommentoi työtä Hengen fenomenologiassaan herruuden ja orjuuden yhteydessä. Hegel tunnistaa tässä työprosessin ja taistelun tunnustamisesta herruuden ja orjuuden dialektiikan historian, joka johtaa herruuden ja orjuuden synteesiin. Siinä kaikki sisäistävät herruuden, kuten Taneli Kivipukki osoitti.
    ellauri352.html on line 78: Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer (born 21 December 1952 in Meßkirch) is a German philosopher and professor of theoretical philosophy at the university of Leipzig. He was the president of the international Ludwig Wittgenstein society (2006-2009) and is now a vice-president of this institution.
    ellauri352.html on line 79: Stekeler rät dazu, Verkrustungen der gegenwärtigen schematischen analytischen Philosophie aufzulösen und stattdessen einen robusten Umgang mit Analogien und Metaphern besonders auch in philosophischen Kommentierungen von Theorien zu etablieren.
    ellauri352.html on line 165: Kirjoittaja tekee aluksi laajan yhteenvedon neurologian tunteiden historiasta kuvaamalla ja tutkimalla Gagen tapausta, tapahtumaa, jossa pohjoisamerikkalainen nimeltä Phineas Gage sai otsalohkonsa kiinni rautakangolla koko XX vuosisadan toisen puoliskon ajan. Toisin kuin raamatun Pinehas, joka työnsi kangen nussijoiden läpitte. Tämän tapauksen jälkeen hän selvisi hengissä vain näön menetyksellä raudan osumasta kohdasta. Kautta tämän tapauksen kuvauksen Damásio havainnollistaa ja selventää hermoston ja sen makro- ja mikrorakenteiden toimintaa.
    ellauri352.html on line 355: Hän opiskelee kieliä (erityisesti sanskritia) ja uskontotieteitä tavoitteenaan kerätä tarvittava materiaali rukousta käsittelevään väitöskirjaan, johka hän ryhtyi vuodesta 1909. Hänen opettajiaan ovat mm. Israel Lévi ja Sylvain Levi. Vuonna 1901 hänestä tuli "sivistymättömien kansojen uskontojen historian" johtaja jossain ammattikorkeassa.
    ellauri352.html on line 376: Huhtikuussa 1967 työskennellessään opettajana Cubberley High Schoolissa Palo Altossa Jones loi 15-vuotiaiden maailmanhistorian opiskelijoidensa kanssa projektin, jossa he kokivat fasistisen liikkeen nimeltä The Wave kasvun. Jones aikoi tämän olevan vain viikon mittainen harjoitus. Hänellä oli suunniteltu oppituntisuunnitelma, joka sisälsi tervehdyksen, iskulauseen ja salaiset "poliisijoukot". Jones päätti kokeilun opettajien ja vanhempien valituksen jälkeen. Jones paljasti sitten, että se oli harjoitus, jonka tarkoituksena oli antaa opiskelijoille suora kokemus siitä, kuinka helposti heidät saatettiin johtaa harhaan käyttäytymään fasistien tavoin, ja se vetää rinnastuksia kansallissosialistisen liikkeen nousuun Saksassa. [ viite tarvitaan ]
    ellauri352.html on line 393: Thales saavutti rikkauksia oliivisadosta ennustamalla säätä. Yhdessä versiossa hän osti kaikki Miletoksen oliivipuristimet ennakoituaan sään ja hyvän sadon tietylle vuodelle. Tarinan toisessa versiossa Aristoteles selittää, että Thales oli varannut puristimet etukäteen alennuksella ja saattoi vuokrata ne korkealla hinnalla kysynnän ollessa huipussaan ennustuksensa perusteella erityisen hyvästä sadosta. Tämä tarinan ensimmäinen versio muodostaisi ensimmäisen historiallisesti tunnetun futuurien luomisen ja käytön, kun taas toinen versio olisi ensimmäinen historiallisesti tunnettu optioiden luominen ja käyttö.
    ellauri352.html on line 438: Tänään kohtalonkysymys on se, miten käy luontokatastrofissa. Huonosti, veikkaanpa. Elämme vaikeita aikoja, ystävä hyvä. Oppiminen on ollut ihmislajin menestyxen salaisuus. Parempi olisi ollut oppimatta tätä kaikkea, kun historiasta ei kuitenkaan mitään opita. Sanoi Marcus Aurelius sano.
    ellauri352.html on line 484: Sittemmin käydyt nolot asiantuntijakeskustelut tekevät selväksi, että tapaus tarjoaa esimerkillistä materiaalia keskusteluun peruskysymyksistä monilla tiedon aloilla, kuten omaelämäkerran kirjallisessa genressä, Shoa-historiografiassa, sen käsittelyssä tapana. menneisyyden ja Shoan poliittisen aseman ymmärtäminen yleismaailmallisena poliittisena menneisyytenä, uhrikertomus, suullinen historia, muistiteoria, traumateoria, terapeuttinen muistojen käsittely jne.
    ellauri352.html on line 616: Without giving anything away, let me say this: I made a bunch of ghosts. They were sort of cynical; they were stuck in this realm, called the bardo (from the Tibetan notion of a sort of transitional purgatory between rebirths), stuck because they´d been unhappy or unsatisfied in life. The greatest part of their penance is that they feel utterly inessential – incapable of influencing the living. Take-home lesson: It´s un-American to be unsatisfied with life or cynical.
    ellauri352.html on line 619: Of his influences, Saunders has written:
    ellauri352.html on line 623: Saunders considered himself an Objectivist in his twenties but now views the philosophy unfavorably, likening it to neoconservatism. He is a student of Smegma Buddhism. Kumma ettei kukaan verrannut tätä Divina Comediaan. Ennen käärmeöljykauppiaan uraansa texasilainen Saunders työskenteli öljymiehenä.
    ellauri352.html on line 638: Alexis-Charles-Henri Clérel, Tocquevillen kreivi, kavereille vaan Sir Alexis, synt.29. kesäkuuta 1805 Pariisissa ja kuol. 16. huhtikuuta 1859 Cannesissa, oli maistraatti, kirjailija, historioitsija, akateemikko, matkustaja, filosofi, politologi, sosiologian edeltäjä ja mikä pahinta, ranskalainen poliitikko.
    ellauri352.html on line 657: James syntyi 3. helmikuuta 1907 New Yorkissa, Yhdysvalloissa ja kuoli 1997 munuaisten vajaatoimintaan. Hän on tunnetuin usean sukupolven historiallisten ja fiktiivisten tarinoiden kirjoittamisesta. Hänen romaaniensa nimet perustuvat yleensä tiettyyn maantieteelliseen sijaintiin. James on todennut haastatteluissaan saaneensa suuren vaikutuksen Charles Dickensin teoksista. Kirjoittajauransa aikana James on kirjoittanut yli 40 romaania ja tarinaa. Hänen kirjoituksensa sisältävät tyypillisesti pitkiä perhedraamoja, jotka kuvaavat useita sukupolvia tietyllä maantieteellisellä paikalla. Monet hänen kirjoistaan ovat olleet bestsellereitä ja laajalti suosittuja, koska ne on valittu moniin Kuukauden kirjan klubeihin.
    ellauri352.html on line 676: James Michener pyyhkäisee meidät ajassa taaksepäin juutalaisen uskon alkuun, tuhansia vuosia sitten. Neljän nykyajan miehen ja naisen edeltäjien kautta koemme juutalaisten koko värikkään historian, mukaan lukien varhaisten heprealaisten elämän ja heidän vainonsa, kristinuskon, ristiretkien ja espanjalaisen inkvisition vaikutuksen aina perustamiseen asti. nykyisestä Israelista ja Lähi-idän konfliktista. "Laaja kronologia täynnä jännitystä", sanoo PHILADELPHIA TUTKIJA.
    ellauri352.html on line 686: Mutta kaikesta vihasta huolimatta (ja selvästi vihaan sitä paljon, lol) kirjassa oli loistavia osia ja osa siitä oli erittäin opettavaista. Lukuun ottamatta 50-luvun moraalia, se antoi valtavan käsityksen Palestiinan/Israelin ja juutalaisten historiasta. Vielä nykyäänkin osa siitä pitää paikkansa. En voi sivuuttaa tätä ja antaa sille yhden tähden. Harmi vain, että hyvät tavarat on haudattu So:n alle. Paljon. Paskaa. *Muokkaa 8.6.22: Tarkemman harkinnan jälkeen olen päättänyt muuttaa arvosteluni 1 tähteen.
    ellauri352.html on line 690: Ilman kehystä tai painopistettä, joka piti löyhästi Centennial-juhlaa yhdessä, tämä massiivinen mutta mielivaltaisesti pirstoutunut itärannikon yhteisön historia – Marylandin saari, 1583–1978 – on lähes vailla perinteistä romaanillista nautintoa. Noin sata hahmoa esitetään lujasti tyypeinä (esim. "Bartley Paxmore, 31-vuotiaana, oli uudentyylinen kveekari"), useimmat heistä ovat kolmen edustavan perheen jäseniä: katoliset, maanomistajat, ylemmän luokan jälkeläiset. Edmund Steed, joka tutki Chesapeakea John Smithin kanssa vuonna 1608; Timothy Turlockin tyhmä, mutta innokas alemman luokan jälkeläinen, joka tuli Marylandiin indentoituneena palvelijana; ja kveekari Edmund Paxmoren vakaa, keskiluokkainen laivanrakennusjälkeläinen, joka hylättiin Marylandissa vuonna 1661 laajojen Massachusettsin ruoskimisen jälkeen. Vuosien varrella näiden klaanien on kohdattava merirosvoja, myrskyjä, insestiä, seksismiä (kyllä, monet naiset täällä ovat epätodennäköisiä feministejä), filanderista syntyneitä paskiaisia, vallankumousta (kaikki kolme jälkeläistä liittyvät lopulta mukaan, jopa rojalisti Steeds), ja - noin puolet kirjasta - orjuuskysymys. Turlockit ovat limaisia ​​orjakauppiaita, Steedit ovat lempeitä orjanomistajia, paxmorit ovat rajuja abolitionisteja, ja - melko häpeämättömänä Rootsista - Caterit ovat orjia, jotka näkyvät ruoskan alla ja peiton alla, mandingotyylisissä kolmioissa. ("Haluatko jäädä pidempään, kulta?").
    ellauri352.html on line 692: Sisällissotaan (kahdeksan sivua), osterien ruoppausliiketoimintaan ja 1900-luvulle – joka on pelkistetty kolmeen omituisen valikoivaan vinjettiin: Paxmore, joka pelasti 40 000 juutalaista Hitleriltä, ​​erottelutaistelu ja. . . Watergate, jossa toinen Paxmore teki itsemurhan Valkoisessa talossa. Siis fiktiona – kauttaaltaan pinnallinen ja luonnosmainen, ilman teemaa (paitsi "Se on mennyt. Kaikki on mennyt"), joka yhdistää tai rikastaa melodramaattisia jaksoja. Myöskään kaikki Michenerin sulatettu tutkimus ei tuota kivuttomia faktajuhlia: paljon lukee kuin yläkoulun tekstiä ("Kolme syytä tähän"); muun muassa Henry Clayn ja Geon vierailevat esiintymiset. Washington ("Sinun sopimus, kenraali") vaikuttaa typerältä; ja dialektiset keskustelut uskonnosta ja orjuudesta ovat tylsiä. Mutta sellaisissa asioissa kuin laivanrakennus, osterointi, ankanmetsästys, Jimmy-sininen rapu ("se herkullinen äyriäinen") ja Onk-tai hanhi, Michener on suuri käsityön ja tieteen popularisoija. Tämä merkittävä lahja yhdessä valtavan Michener-vaikutuksen kanssa lähettää varmasti miljoonat lukijat sukeltamaan miljoonan lempeästi luettavalle sivulle tylsää historiaa ja kaavafiktiota.
    ellauri352.html on line 700: Yksinkertainen mutta epäjohdonmukainen Michenerin perhekolmio -lähestymistapa tarjoaa täplän, hämmentävän yleiskatsauksen monimutkaiseen historiaan; samalla kun hän korostaa Puolan johtajuuden puutteita, hän idealisoi ja hämärtää muualla – esimerkiksi lähes täydellisellä puolalaisen antisemitismin kalkinpoistolla. Ja huolimatta muutamista seurusteluista ja häistä, hahmojen paraati täällä on tasaista, täysin huumorintajutonta, ei-osallistuvaa. Etsi sitten muualta joko vahvaa historiallista fiktiota tai johdonmukaista johdatusta Puolan historiaan. Mutta katso siitä huolimatta bestseller-luetteloita: tosiasiat ovat kasaantuneet, otsikko on otsikoissa, sivurivi on väistämätön.
    ellauri353.html on line 89: Pikku Marko keräsi paikallislehistä ja kirjoista ihanteita ja irvikuvia elämästä ja sen tarkoituxesta, miehuudesta, oikeasta ja vääryydestä, hyvyydestä ja pahuudesta. Juupa juu. Peräänantamaton tarmo ja keskinkertainen taipumus.
    ellauri353.html on line 125: "Poika" kättelee izeään ilmassa kuin Sirkka-yäti isohampaiselle rumpalille. (Tässä on vähän homovirettä.) "Minä maxan", hän sanoi. "Piisaako?" "Isä korjaa sen. Se on rautanaula kuule." "Älä viizi ryypätä." "Viimeinen kerta. Lupaan sen." Tapperit on rupusakkia. Inhoittavien kommunistivoimien kanssa tapahtuvassa voimainmittelyssä rautanaulamainen, kirskahtavan ehjä miehisyys on muita suurempi.
    ellauri353.html on line 198: Vuonna 1949 Buñuel luopui Espanjan kansalaisuudestaan tullakseen meksikolaiseksi. Los Olvidados Ciudad Mexicon katulapsista pysyy Munuelin teosten joukossa hetkenä, jolloin hän murtautui pinnalle ja räjähti, ennen kuin hän vaipui takaisin kuin ilotulite etuoikeutettujen maailmaan, jossa hänen surrealistinen näkemyksensä rakasti pelata. Buñuelin katulapset eivät ole "jalostettuja" heidän epätoivoisesta selviytymistaistelusta, he ovat itse asiassa armottomia saalistajia, jotka eivät ole parempia kuin heidän yhtä romantisoitumattomat uhrinsa. Kuvaamisen aikana useat miehistön jäsenet vastustivat tuotantoa monin eri tavoin: yksi teknikko kohtasi Buñuelin ja kysyi, miksi hän ei tehnyt "oikeaa" meksikolaista elokuvaa "sen sijaan surkea kuva kuten tämä"; elokuvan kampaaja erosi paikan päällä kohtauksen johdosta, jossa päähenkilön äiti kieltäytyy antamasta hänelle ruokaa ("Meksikossa yksikään äiti ei sanoisi noin pojalleen."); toinen henkilökunnan jäsen kehotti Buñuelia luopumaan "roskakasalla" ampumisesta. Eivät pitäneet rikkaan spanjuunan ilostelusta märkäselkien kustannuxella. Buñuelilta vaadittiin jopa Meksikon kansalaisuuden peruuttamista.
    ellauri353.html on line 210: rehottavan machismon tuhoisat vaikutukset: 2kpl
    ellauri353.html on line 277: The Friedmans were recent guests at the Commonwealth Club of Kalak it in Los Angeles. Each author speaks and then takes questions from the audience. Good afternoon and welcome to today's meeting of the common a Club of California. Brought to you from the St Francis Hotel relooking Union Square. I am doing an orderly chair. We also welcome the listener. A.W. F.M. in Sitka Alaska. One of more than two hundred twenty five stations across the country. Joining us for America's longest running. Radio program. We invite all our listeners here and on radio. To visit the club's website. At W.W.W. Commonwealth Club. Dot org. And now for today's speakers. It is with great pleasure that I introduce those plucky Jews, the Friedmans. The Friedmans are with us today. Connection with their recently published memoirs. Bucky people. Published by the University of Chicago. Press this year. They have been partners in love. And in life. For over sixty years.
    ellauri353.html on line 279: Milton Friedman is widely regarded as the leader of the Chicago school. Of monetary economics. Stresses the importance of the quantity of money. As an instrument of government policy. Terminated. A business cycles and inflation. After graduating in one nine hundred thirty two with a Bachelor of Arts from Rutgers. He received graduate degree. From the University of Chicago. And Columbia University. Since one thousand nine hundred seventy seven. Professor print. Has been a senior research fellow at the Hoover Institution. Homeless or University Professor Friedman received the one nine hundred seventy six Nobel Prize for ECT. That's. In addition to his scientific work. Professor Friedman has written extensively on public policy. Always with primary emphasis on the preservation and extension of. Individual freedoms. In his most important works in this area. Perhaps an ever. The important area. Is life. He has collaborated by. Roads. An accomplished. Economist in her own right. Together they wrote. Capitalism and Freedom. Free to choose. And tyranny of the status quo. Free to choose and tyranny of the status quo later rip it into a T.V. series of the same names that were shown over the public. Public Broadcast stations.
    ellauri353.html on line 281: Mrs. FRIEDMAN attended Reed College and studied economics at the University of Chicago. She was on the staff of the National Research and the bureau. A few. Home Economics. She next joined the staff of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation where she worked until she married Milton and moved to New York. Since then she has continued home economic research on her own publishing. Individually and coauthoring the three works referred to a few moments ago. She was mostly a producer of the P.B.S. T.V. series free to choose. And in one thousand nine hundred six she received an honorary doctorate from Pepperdine University. The Milton. And Rose de Friedman Foundation which the Freedman's us. Promotes parental choice. Of the schools. Attend. As I mentioned the title of their most recent book is Two lucky people. I'm being told by my parents. That the harder you work the luckier you get. It is no wonder the Friedan consider themselves lucky. They have worked long hard to make the contributions they have made to each other and to our society. We the members and listen. Well are the lucky ones today. To have them share themselves and their insights with us once again. We welcome. (Milton claps his hands to them.)
    ellauri353.html on line 295: So I gave up my job and we moved when we got to this crime scene. I didn't inquire whether the university had a nepotism rule. As the University of Chicago did or we went. Later if the husband worked for the university his wife. Could not be employed there even as a janitor. This change however with women's lives. Today. If the university wishes to hire a qualified male. It has to find a job for his wife. At the best of my knowledge that's not work in reverse.
    ellauri353.html on line 297: And I really have mixed feelings about either arrangement. so instead. I have is very happy to spend the school year doing some work on my dissertation. I got used to being a homemaker. I took some funky classes in pottery, (Sorry Milton I mean) ceramics. And I got pregnant at the the back end of school here we left university and headed for Amman or Milton spent the summer writing a book. Jointly with two other people. And I spent the summer being pregnant and I'm comfortable. But war was heating up and decided that once our baby arrived we would move. The washing. He would go to work probably at the Treasury Department. I hope to spend my time as a mother. Unfortunately that didn't work out. Our first pregnancy. My first experience at. Guarding a family came to a sad end when the baby was stillborn. So I went to work in watching them till I could get pregnant again. This time they were more fortunate. And once our daughter was born. I had no thought of going back to work. At least until my. Our children were grown. And as it turned out I never did go back as far as spam innocents are concerned. When I had the opportunity to do some work at home without leaving. So there.
    ellauri353.html on line 299: But there weren't too many. I must confess that my experience combining life is a homemaker and an economist's was easier than it is for many women. I chose the right husband from the beginning. From the beginning we shared our interest in economics whether the news may call in the speech an article or a book. I was part of the activity in the sense that Milton always wanted me to read whatever he wrote. And he took my suggestion seriously. It gave me the feeling that I was practicing what I was trained for. But also that I was contributing to his career. It was in a sense our career. So when he was awarded the Nobel Prize it's received other many many many other net honors. And people always feel sorry for me and ask me how it feels to have him getting all the honors. My answer is always the same one. It is our honor I was part of that. When our children left for good. I became more active. With us and we go off for books. Where do I come out on a women's lib or feminist women have a real problem. But in my opinion the present solution is worse than the disease. The man. Or children. And those women who still believe that a mother's first job is to bring up her children. Women's lives. Made those women. Feel that is inferior to a paying job in the market. Therefore they must be and feared with the will to have a full time job outside. It is heightened competition between man and women. Husband and wife. So-called woman is problem. Has not. And I don't believe will solve the problem. Or a woman. There is a problem.
    ellauri353.html on line 305: Shut up Rose, I thought I would use my few remaining 50 minutes here. You forward publishing people would ask me what's it going to be like. And I said well it's a book which is starting out as a love story. And which will end up as a treatise on social and that's largely what happened though it's throughout from beginning to end it really is a love story because Rose and I have really lived a love story we first met. Just exist. Just sixty sixty six years ago. In September. Nineteen thirty two. And from that time to this we have been close. And I trust shall continue to be said though she gives me no guarantees for the future. To talk about one area of social policy. Which we have engaged for many years. And recently made a major move. And that area is schooling elementary and - this is the main thing! educational vouchers. Parental choice of schools. Not to put a too fine point to it, better folks should have freedom to put their kids in better schools. Hooray democracy, fuck equality, like Alexis Tocqueville said, etc. etc. ad nauseam.
    ellauri353.html on line 364: Pirozhkovan mukaan "Ennen kuin tapasin Baabelin, luin paljon, tosin ilman erityistä ohjausta. Luin kaiken, minkä sain käsiini. Babel huomasi tämän ja sanoi minulle: "Sillä tavalla lukeminen ei johda mihinkään. on aikaa lukea kirjoja, jotka ovat todella arvokkaita. Jokaisen koulutetun ihmisen on luettava noin sata kirjaa. Yritän joskus tehdä niistä luettelon." Ja muutama päivä myöhemmin hän toi minulle luettelon, jossa oli antiikin kirjailijoita, kreikkalaisia ja roomalaisia - Homeros, Herodotos, Lucretius, Suetonius - ja myös kaikki myöhemmän eurooppalaisen kirjallisuuden klassikot, alkaen Erasmuksesta, Rabelais´sta, Cervantesista, Swiftistä, ja Coster (n.h.), ja jatkuu 1800-luvun kirjailijoihin, kuten Stendhaliin, Mériméeen ja Flaubertiin." Punaisen ratsuväen kauhistuttavaan väkivaltaan näytti jyrkästi vastakohtaiselta itse Baabelin lempeä luonne.
    ellauri353.html on line 370: Babelin mielihahmo oli fiktiivinen mafiapomo Benya Krik, joka perustuu löyhästi historialliseen hahmoon Mishka Yaponchik. Benya Krik on yksi venäläisen kirjallisuuden suurista antisankareista.
    ellauri353.html on line 464: Budyonnyn suosikkihevonen, budjonnyin hevonen nimeltään Sophist, on ikuistettu kuvanveistäjä N. V. Tomskyn M. I. Kutuzovin muistomerkkiin, joka on asennettu Moskovaan Borodinon taistelun panoraamamuseon eteen. Kollegat sanoivat Simosta jälkikäteen näin:
    ellauri353.html on line 492: Hmelnytskyin suunnitelman mukaan tavoitteena oli Puolan ja Liettuan liittovaltion valtion täydellinen likvidaatio ("koko kruunu tuhottaisiin, ikään kuin Puolan kruunu ei olisi koskaan ollut olemassa") ja itsenäisen Venäjän valtion (no, Venäjän suuriruhtinaskunta) luominen koko Ukrainan ja Valko- Venäjän etnografiselle alueelle Hetmanin ja Zaporozshin armeijan vallan alla. Tämä hämmensi suuresti Moskovan hallitusta, joka teki kaikkensa estääkseen tämän liittouman menestyksen. Moskova aloitti sodan Ruotsin kanssa solmittuaan rauhan Puolan ja Liettuan liittovaltion kanssa. Samaan aikaan Puolan ja Liettuan liittovaltion alueella riehui sota, joka jäi historiaan nimellä "Tulva". Sotilaalliset epäonnistumiset ja epäonnistuminen diplomaattisten suunnitelmien toteuttamisessa joudutti hänen kuolemaansa. Khmel sai paskahalvauxen.
    ellauri353.html on line 531: Isaac Babel kirjoitti kokonaisen kirjan juutalaisista gangstereista. Hän ei ollut romanttinen sielu. Tässä lyhyessä novellissa moderni kirjailija, nyt politrukki, keskustelee Gedalin kanssa, joka on vastoinkäymisten ja päämäärien vartija, toisen ajan asioita, joista ei ole juurikaan hyötyä nykyisyydessä. Babel jättää meidät, jopa nyt vuonna 2023, pelkäämään seuraavaa historian käännettä, pelkäämään seuraavaa armeijaa, jolla on totuus, yksi totuus ja joka tulee luoksemme missä tahansa olemmekin. Olisiko se vihdoinkin Israelin armeija?
    ellauri353.html on line 535: Ei ole enää yhtä, keskitettyä yhtenäistä Fourth Internationalia. Eiole enää eukkoa on nuori neito vain... Suurimman osan olemassaolostaan ja historiastaan NKVD:n agentit jahtivat Neljättä Internationaalia, ja se joutui poliittisen sorron kohteeksi sellaisissa maissa kuin Ranska ja Yhdysvallat sekä Neuvostoliiton kannattajat. Neljäs internationaali kamppaili ylläpitääkseen yhteyttä näissä tukahduttamis- ja sorron olosuhteissa toisen maailmansodan aikana, koska myöhemmät proletaarikapinat olivat usein neuvostoliittolaisten stalinistien ja militanttien nationalististen ryhmien vaikutuksen alaisia, mikä johti tappioihin neljännelle internationaalille ja nujersi trotskilaiset, jotka eivät sittemmin onnistuneet saamaan merkityksellistä vaikutusvaltaa.
    ellauri353.html on line 537: Neljäs Internationaali koki suuren hajoamisen vuonna 1940 ja vieläkin merkittävämmän skisman vuonna 1953. Skismaattisten ryhmittymien osittainen yhdistyminen tapahtui vuonna 1963, mutta organisaatio ei koskaan toipunut riittävästi, eikä se onnistunut nousemaan uudelleen yhdeksi kansainväliseksi ryhmittymäksi. Trotskilaisten vastaus tällaiseen tilanteeseen on ollut useiden internationaalien muodostaminen eri puolilla maailmaa, ja jotkut ovat eri mieltä siitä, mikä organisaatio edustaa historiallisen neljännen internationaalin todellista perintöä ja poliittista jatkuvuutta.
    ellauri353.html on line 551: "Komarówin taistelu oli yksi Puolan ja bolshevikkien välisen sodan tärkeimmistä taisteluista. … Se oli sodan historian suurin ratsuväen taistelu vuodesta 1813 lähtien ja viimeinen suuri taistelu, jossa ratsuväkeä käytettiin sellaisenaan eikä ratsastavana jalkaväkenä.
    ellauri353.html on line 578: Nykyaikaisen ukrainalaisen sotahistorioitsijan Ya.Yu. Tinchenkon laskelmien mukaan, "vuosien 1930-1931 entisten ukrainalaisten upseerien joukkopidätysten seurauksena ainakin 10 tuhatta ihmistä sorrettiin." Valitettavasti tutkija ei osoita, kuinka suuri osuus heistä oli puna-armeijan aktiivisessa palveluksessa olevia komentajia ja kuinka paljon niitä, jotka olivat olleet "siviilielämässä" kauan sitten; mutta on ilmeistä, että puna-armeijan sorrettuja komentajia oli tuhansia.
    ellauri353.html on line 582: Stalin ja muut NKP:n johtajat tiesivät erittäin hyvin Ranskan ja Englannin vallankumousten historian, eikä "punaisen Bonaparten" tai "punaisen munkin"1 haamu ei antanut heidän nukkua rauhassa. On huomattava, etteivät he olleet ainoita: valkoisten siirtolaisuuden aikana heräsi aika ajoin toiveita siitä, että Neuvostoliiton sotilasvallankaappaus, jota johtaa jokin kunnianhimoinen sotilasjohtaja, jonain päivänä pyyhkäisi pois bolshevikkihallinnon ja palauttaisi heidän valtakuntansa Venäjän heille.
    ellauri353.html on line 599: CommunistCrimesin tavoitteena on lisätä kansainvälistä tietoisuutta kommunististen hallitusten tekemistä rikoksista ihmisyyttä vastaan ympäri maailmaa. Teemme yhteistyötä riippumattomien historioitsijoiden ja tutkijoiden kanssa. Portaalia ylläpitää Viron historiallisen muistin instituutti, joka on kansainvälinen ja valtiosta riippumaton akateeminen tutkimuskeskus, jolla on yli 20 vuoden kokemus riippumatoista.
    ellauri355.html on line 63: Viikon ajan Hasbulatovin ja Rutskoin johtama parlamentti jatkoi neuvotteluja, järjestelivät vartiointia ja säätivät lakeja. Alussa saartorenkaan läpi pääsi suuntaan ja toiseen, mutta pian se kuitenkin suljettiin. Linnoittautuneet kulkivat renkaan läpi salakäytävien ja viemärien kautta. Tuhansia kommunisteja jäi piiritysrenkaan ulkopuolelle odottaen turhaan parlamenttitaloon pääsyä. Alussa lyhytkestoiseksi aiottuun etäällä Valkoisesta talosta alkaneeseen kommunistien mielenosoitukseen liittyi noin 1000 voimakasta nuorta miestä, jotka marssivat yliopiston sijasta kohti valkoista taloa. Hyvin koulutetut mellakoijat tuhosivat busseja ja autoja sekä hakkasivat miliisejä verille. Mielenosoittajat mursivat Valkoisen talon piiritysrenkaan ajamalla kuorma-autolla piikkilangan läpi. Oppositiota kutsuttiin "punaruskeiksi", koska heissä oli kommunistien lisäksi kansallissosialisteja. Välittäjänä toiminut ortodoksisen kirkon patriarkka Aleksi II järkyttyi niin pahoin alkaneista murhista että sai sydänkohtauksen, minkä takia joutui pitkäksi aikaa sairaalahoitoon. Valkoisen talon lähellä taisteltiin vuorokauden verran.
    ellauri355.html on line 86: The GKChP hardliners dispatched KGB agents, who detained Gorbachev at his holiday estate but failed to detain the recently elected president of a newly reconstituted Russia, Boris Yeltsin, who had been both an ally and critic of Gorbachev. The GKChP was poorly organized and met with effective resistance by both Yeltsin and a civilian campaign of anti-authoritarian protesters, mainly in Moscow. The coup collapsed in two days, and Gorbachev returned to office while the plotters all lost their posts. Yeltsin subsequently became the dominant leader and Gorbachev lost much of his influence. The failed coup led to both the immediate collapse of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) and the dissolution of the USSR four months later.
    ellauri355.html on line 100: Dmitry Timofeyevich Yazov (Russian: Дми́трий Тимофе́евич Я́зов; 8 November 1924 – 25 February 2020) was a Marshal of the Soviet Union. A veteran of the Great Patriotic War, Yazov served as Minister of Defence from 1987 until he was arrested for his part in the 1991 August Coup, four months before the fall of the Soviet Union. Yazov was the last person to be appointed to the rank of Marshal of the Soviet Union on 28 April 1990, the only Marshal born in Siberia, and at the time of his death on 25 February 2020, he was the last living Marshal of the Soviet Union. Now they are no marshals left in Soviet Union.
    ellauri355.html on line 102: Yazov spent 18 months in Matrosskaya Tishina, a prison in northern Moscow. According to the magazine Vlast No. 41(85) of 14 October 1991, he contacted the President from jail with a recorded video message, in which he repented and called himself "an old fool". Yazov denies ever doing that, or that under the influence of fatigue he succumbed to the persuasion of television reporters, and he also accepted the amnesty offered by Jelzin stating that he was not guilty. He was dismissed from military service by Presidential Order, and at his discharge, was awarded a ceremonial weapon to polish under his desk. He was also awarded an order of honor by the President of Russian Federation. Yazov later worked as a military adviser at the General Staff Academy. He died in 2020 in Moscow, after a prolonged illness.
    ellauri355.html on line 105: Yanayev spent 18 months in Matrosskaya Tishina. He later became a chairman of the department of national history at the Russian International Academy of Tourism.
    ellauri355.html on line 164: Marraskuuhun 1917 saakka Leitnerin tehtaalta lähetettiin rintamalle 3600 taistelumallia. Koko yrityksen olemassaolon historian aikana tuotantolinjoilta valmistettiin yli 100 tuhatta polkupyörää, yli 60 mallia hallittiin. Yrityksen vallankumousta edeltävän historian voimavarana on ensimmäisten moottoripyörien, kolmipyörien ja useiden autotyyppien julkaisu.
    ellauri355.html on line 221: HVZ paloi ennakoitavissa olevassa historiassa kahdesti - vuonna 2009 ja vuonna 2017. Maaliskuussa 2009 palo kattoi 150 neliömetriä. Neliömetriä, yksi kaupoista paloi kokonaan. Palo syttyi keskellä työpäivää, henkilövahinkoja ei sattunut. Vaaratilanteen syyksi kutsuttiin vanhentunutta sähköjohtoa. Samaan aikaan Harkovin pyörätehtaan maalaamo joutui hätätilaan. Ukrainan hätätilanneministeriö selvitti palon.
    ellauri355.html on line 264: Putin käytti yli 30 minuuttia kertomaan Venäjän, Liettuan, Puolan ja Ukrainan historiasta monologissa, joka vei katsojat Oleg Viisaan 800-luvun hallinnosta 1300-luvun taisteluihin ja Leninin ulkopolitiikan kritiikkiin.
    ellauri355.html on line 270: "Sanoin hänelle sitten, että uskon, että teet valtavan historiallisen virheen tukemalla kaikkea, mitä siellä, Ukrainassa tapahtuu, työntämällä Venäjän pois", Putin sanoi.
    ellauri359.html on line 42: Elokuva "Kaislikossa suhisee" oli yllättävän paska. All male panel ikäviä hinurityyppejä, varsinkin toad, mutta muutkin. Oliko kirjoittaja kenties vasenkätinen?
    ellauri359.html on line 47: Kenneth Grahame (/ ˈ ɡ r eɪ. ə m / GREY -əm; 8. maaliskuuta 1859 – 6. heinäkuuta 1932), jota sivuttiin albumissa 262, oli brittiläinen kirjailija, syntynyt Edinburghissa Skotlannissa. Hän on tunnetuin lastenkirjallisuuden klassikosta The Wind in the Willows (1908). Kirja mukautettiin myöhemmin näyttämölle ja elokuvalle, joista ensimmäinen oli AA Milnen Toad of Toad Hall, joka perustuu osaan The Wind in the Willows -kirjasta. Muita sovituksia ovat Cosgrove Hall Filmsin Tuuli Willowsissa (ja sen myöhemmät pitkät tv-sarjat) ja Walt Disney -elokuvat (Ichabodin ja herra Toadin seikkailut).
    ellauri359.html on line 49: Kenneth Grahame syntyi 8. maaliskuuta 1859 Edinburghissa. Kun hän oli hieman yli vuoden vanha, hänen isänsä, asianajaja, sai nimityksen sheriffin sijaiseksi Argyllshiressä, Inverarayssa Loch Fynellä. Kun hän oli viisivuotias, hänen äitinsä kuoli tulirokkoihin ja hänen isänsä, jolla oli alkoholiongelma, määräsi Kennethin, veljensä Willien, sisarensa Helenin ja uuden vauvan Rolandin hoidon Granny Inglesille, lasten äidin puolelta, Cookham Deanissa Cookhamin kylässä Berkshiressä.
    ellauri359.html on line 55: Unelmapäivien ja Grahamen voiton, The Wind in the Willows -julkaisun välillä on kymmenen vuoden tauko. Tuon vuosikymmenen aikana Grahamesta tuli isä. Pikkupoikassaan Alastairissa näkemänsä itsepäinen ja itsepäinen luonne muuttui herra rupikonnaksi, joka on yksi sen neljästä päähahmosta. Alastair tappoi itsensä radalla ollessaan 19-vuotias opiskelija Oxfordin yliopistossa 7. toukokuuta 1920. Hänen kuolemansa kirjattiin tahattomaksi kuolemaksi kunnioituksesta isäänsä kohtaan. Kirjan hahmo, joka tunnetaan nimellä Ratty, on saanut inspiraationsa hänen hyvästä ystävästään ja kirjailijastaan ​​Sir Arthur Quiller-Couchista. Grahame mainitsee tämän allekirjoitetussa kopiossa, jonka hän antoi Quiller-Couchin tyttärelle Foy Felicialle.
    ellauri359.html on line 61: Actually, I already knew that; what I didn’t know was that the cause was very possibly inherited syphilis. Grahame, a dyed-in-the-wool bachelor who loved “messing about in boats”, seems to have married under duress, the sort to which upper-middle-classes were particularly susceptible: namely, propriety. His sister believed Elspeth Thomson deliberately compromised him. On receiving news of his nuptials, she asked if he really intended to marry her. “I suppose so; I suppose so,” was the telling reply.
    ellauri359.html on line 63: But back to Alastair, aka “Mouse”, who seems to have been the only bond between Grahame and his increasingly sour spouse. It is Gauger’s and others’ opinion that Mole, the most endearing character in the tale, is given the ability to see, unlike the rest of his kin, because Grahame was exhibiting a profound form of denial about his son’s disability.
    ellauri359.html on line 65: The original mole entered the Grahame household some years before the book. The author found the creature in his garden tussling with a blackbird for a worm. He kept it as a pet until a new housekeeper, thinking it vermin, killed it. On learning her mistake, she cried: “Oh, but sir, couldn’t you just make the mole into a story for Master Alastair?” Shortly after, Graham began to regale his son with bedtime tales of the riverbank creatures.
    ellauri359.html on line 67: For a female reader from the proletarian classes, many of Gauger’s revelations have been particularly painful. Apparently, Grahame did not like women. He did not give any of his furry heroes wives, saying that he wished his book to be “clean of the clash of sex”. The few who do appear – foremost among them the fabulously feisty washerwoman – are ridiculed, in her case mocked as vulgar, ugly and stupid. Nor did Grahame like fat people; the washerwoman thus combines two pet hates.
    ellauri359.html on line 69: But there were others. Like so many Scots before and since, Grahame held a senior post in London’s banking world. When one day a stranger accosted him there with a pistol, firing it off wildly (though happily missing his target), the author’s fear of the underclass took root. Thus, those ragamuffins in the Wild Wood, the knife-wielding, teeth-baring stoats and weasels who destroy property and have no respect for their social superiors – Rat, Toad, Badger and Mole – are his representation of the terrible face of anarchists, working classes and madmen rolled into one.
    ellauri359.html on line 102: Bloken isä James oli sukkahousu joka oli asunut Lontoossa. Hän kävi koulua vain tarpeeksi kauan oppiakseen lukemaan ja kirjoittamaan. Hän jätti koulunsa 10-vuotiaana, ja muutoin hänen äitinsä Catherine Blake (os Wright) koulutti hänet kotona. Vaikka Blakes olivat englantilaisia toisinajattelijoita, William kastettiin 11. joulukuuta St James's Churchissa Piccadillyssa Lontoossa. Raamattu vaikutti varhain ja syvästi Blakeen, ja se pysyi inspiraation lähteenä koko hänen elämänsä ajan. Blaken lapsuuteen sisältyi hänen mukaansa mystisiä uskonnollisia kokemuksia, kuten "Jumalan kasvojen näkeminen nenä lytyssä hänen ikkunaansa vasten, enkelien näkeminen heinäsuovasta ja käynti Vanhan testamentin profeetta Hesekielin luona'.
    ellauri360.html on line 63: Labyrinthissa, Robbe-Grilletin neljäs romaani, on hänen täydellisin esimerkki teorioista, joita hän onnistui havainnollistamaan aikaisemmissa romaaneissaan vain osittain. Selvittäessään labyrinttimaisesti kiemurtelevia tapahtumia lukija ymmärtää, että ranskalaisen kaupungin kaduilla vaeltelee nuori sotilas, joka haluaa toimittaa kenkälaatikon muotoisen paketin toisen sairaalassa kuolleen sotilaan perheelle. Pakkauksen sisältö, lukijaa kiinnostava mysteeri, osoittautuu merkityksettömiksi henkilökohtaisiksi omaisuuksiksi, ei pommiksi tai romaanin juonen ehdottamixi salaisixi papereixi.
    ellauri360.html on line 307: Donna Tartt : Salainen historia
    ellauri360.html on line 373: Suuri sota jätti Tanskan koskematta. Siellä riitti voita ja Pinnebergeiltä sai kaikkea vahvalla kruunulla. Lassikin oli 1922 vähän kallellaan korporativismiin päin: sillä päästäisiin demokratiaa vaivaavasta äänten kalastelusta. Vaikka luokkarajat kärjistyisivät, moraalisessa kazannossa voitettaisiin. Tanskan venstre oli pienviljelijöitä, høyre suurmaanomistajat, rahamiehet, kaupan edustajat ja suurin osa virkamiehistöä.
    ellauri362.html on line 71: Publishers Weekly arvioi romaanin arvostelussa, että se "on pikemminkin rantakirja historiallisten fiktioiden ystäville kuin kirjallinen kunnianosoitus Austenin mestariteokselle", ja katsoo, että tyttäret on kirjoitettu ennustettavasti. Arvostelija arvostelee myös Astonia siitä, ettei se onnistunut jäljittelemään Austenin tyyliä, vaan romaanin proosa on "tylsää ja anakronistista".
    ellauri362.html on line 78: Fitzwilliam Darcy, Gentleman on yhteinen nimi, joka on annettu Pamela Aidanin kirjoittamalle historiallisten romanttisten romaanien trilogialle. Kuten nimestä voi päätellä, ne perustuvat vahvasti Jane Austenin vuoden 1813 romaaniin Ylpeys ja ennakkoluulo, ja niissä on monia romaanin tapahtumia nähtynä herra Fitzwilliam Darcyn, Austenin romaanin keskeisen mieshahmon, näkökulmasta.
    ellauri362.html on line 100: Darcy alkaa torjua Caroline Bingleyn jatkuvaa kritiikkiä Elizabethista, koska se ei ole houkutteleva. Kun Janen ja Elizabethin oleskelu Netherfieldissä on loppumassa, Darcy ja Elizabeth sattuvat jakamaan kirjastoa jonkin aikaa, ja Elizabethin lähdön jälkeen Darcyn uteliaisuus saa hänestä parhaansa ja hän löytää kirjan, jota Elizabeth luki, Miltonin kadonnut paratiisi. ja ryöstää kirjontalankakirjan merkkinsä muistoksi.
    ellauri362.html on line 114: Darcy ja hänen serkkunsa Richard Fitzwilliam matkustavat joka kevät Kentiin auttamaan tätiään Lady Catherinea tämän Rosings Parkin kartanon kevätsiivouxessa. Lady Catherine Bourgh inhoaa kevätsiivousta yhtä paljon kuin Kaislikossa suhiseen myyrä. Heidän linja-automatkallaan Lontoosta Fitzwilliam huomaa Darcyn surkeasti sormeilevan Elizabethin kirjontalangan kirjanmerkkiä, ja hän haluaa kuulla siihen liittyvän romanttisen tarinan. Välttääkseen kertomasta Fitzwilliamille totuutta Darcy päättää nopeasti tarjota hänelle vaihtoehtoisen tarinan siitä, kuinka hän pelasti yhden parhaista ystävistään harkitsemattomasta avioliitosta. Tarina tyydyttää Fitzwilliamin uteliaisuuden ja lisää hänen arviotaan Darcysta.
    ellauri362.html on line 133: Pian Lydian avioliiton jälkeen Bingley ilmoittaa Darcylle, että Netherfieldin vuoden vuokrasopimus on päättymässä. Darcy ehdottaa, että he katsoisivat kiinteistön uudelleen, ja Bingley suostuu nopeasti. Bingley ei koskaan maininnut mitään Janesta, että se olisi alueella, eikä Darcy koskaan mainitse mitään Elizabethista alueella.
    ellauri362.html on line 191: Abbeyn tavallinen elämä keskeytyy hetkeksi, kun ihmisvihainen runoilija herra Cypress tekee jäähyväisvierailun ennen maanpakoon menoa. Hänen lähdön jälkeen on kerrottu haamusta, joka vainoaa rakennusta, ja kauhistuttavan hahmon ilmestyminen kirjastoon saa vieraat järkyttymään. Vasta myöhemmin ilmestys paljastetaan olleen herra Glowryn unelias taloudenhoitaja Crow.
    ellauri362.html on line 272: Duke Ellingtonin porttikiellon Almack'siin todellinen syy on selvinnyt: Ticknor’s version indicates that it was the lateness of his arrival and not the trousers that kept him out. Karen Field on January 15, 2011 at 01:03
    ellauri362.html on line 276: Rachel Knowles writes clean/Christian historical romance set in the time of Jane Austen. She has been sharing her research on this blog since 2011. Rachel lives in the beautiful Georgian seaside town of Weymouth, Dorset, on the south coast of England, with her husband, Andrew.


  • ellauri362.html on line 278: I love your blog, Vic, and this one is so interesting!
    ellauri362.html on line 279: Loved this! I always thought it was because he was in trousers. Your posts are always illuminating.
    ellauri362.html on line 282: Not quite sure what was so wonderful about this sort of elitism, racism, classism etc. Sounds like fun in fantasy, but awful in reality! Unless you happen to be a Darcy heiress, in which case it of course is quite all right.
    ellauri362.html on line 289: "Tom and Jerry" was a commonplace phrase for young men given to drinking, gambling, and riotous living in 19th-century London, England. The term comes from Life in London; or, The Day and Night Scenes of Jerry Hawthorn, Esq., and his elegant friend, Corinthian Tom (1821) by Pierce Egan, the British sports journalist who authored similar accounts compiled as Boxiana. However Brewer notes no more than an "unconscious" echo of the Regency era, and thus Georgian era, origins in the naming of the cartoon.
    ellauri362.html on line 318: Maailma on nykyään kovin hankala paikka elää, Joel Haahtela miettii. Esimerkiksi sielu, jonka avulla ihminen voi Jumalan yhteyden löytää, on valistuksen ja materialismin myötä lähes kadonnut käsistä. ”Suosittu israelilainen kirjailija ja historioitsija Yuval Noah Harari perustelee, ettei sielua voi olla olemassa, koska se ei sovi evoluutioteoriaan, jossa kaiken olemassa olevan voi todentaa, jakaa pienempiin ja muuttuviin osiin.” Tääkö jätkä on luonnontieteilijä? Epäilee jopa darwinismia. Ihmiselle tällainen umpimaterialistinen maailma on Haahtelasta raskas ja lohduton, täynnä virzakiviä, divertikkeleitä ja umpisuolia.
    ellauri362.html on line 343: In John's church there was a lot of swaying and crying and calling his name in vain. Christians are strange people. The bible's view of women stinks. Fuckwad tarkoittaa pönttöä. March 29, 1979 kun 3 Mile Island suli olin New Yorkissa. Kazottiin telkkarista savuavia pönttöjä. Choking the chicken means jacking off.
    ellauri362.html on line 348: Jean Harris, tyttökoulun rehtori, ampui pitkäaikaisen miesystävänsä dieettitohtorin, jonka uuden tyttöystävän alkkarit tervehtivät rehtoria ovella. Dieettitohtorin määräämät huumelääkkeet oli päässeet loppumaan. Hänet tuomittiin toisen asteen murhasta. Killing to prevent the theft of one's property may be legal under certain circumstances, depending on the jurisdiction. In 2013, a jury in south Texas acquitted a man who killed a sex worker who attempted to run away with his money.
    ellauri362.html on line 349: No tuo oli sentään aika vizikästä. Monkey and the baboon playing in the grass. Monkey sticks his fingers up the baboon's ass.
    ellauri362.html on line 433: GEORGE CRABBE syntyi Aldeburghissa, Suffolkin rannikolla, 24. joulukuuta 1754. Hänen isänsä, joka keräsi suolamaksuja satamassa, oli sekä korkeamakuinen että alhainen mies. Varsin huonomaineinen myöhempinä vuosinaan hän oli nuorena miehenä käynyt koulua ja luki Miltonia, Youngia ja muita runoilijoita ääneen perheelleen. Lääkärin ammattiin tarkoitettu George opiskeli lääkäriksi Wickhambrookissa lähellä Bury St. Edmundsia, jonka leikkauksesta hän siirtyi kolme vuotta myöhemmin Woodbridgen lääkäriksi. Täällä hän viipyi vuosina 1771–1775 ja tutustui Sarah Elmyyn, joka, vaikka meni kymmenen vuotta ennen kuin he menivät naimisiin, vaikutti alusta alkaen pehmentävästi ja kirkastavasti muotoutumattomien nuorten melko synkkään luonteeseen. Juuri heidän tapaamisensa aikaan Crabbe esiintyi ensimmäisen kerran tunnetussa painetussa sanassa runoilijana. Erään naistenlehden ”runoilijoiden nurkassa” vuonna 1772 ilmestyi useita säkeitä, joista osa oli signeerattu ”G. Ebbare" ja yksi "G. Ebbaac”, joiden arvellaan olevan Crabbe. Yksi näistä, joka koostuu kahdesta erittäin kauniista säkeistöstä, nimeltään The Wish, juhlii runoilijan "Mirriä", joka oli Crabben Sarah Elmylle antama runollinen nimi.
    ellauri362.html on line 437: Oppisopimuskoulutuksensa päättyessä Crabbe palasi kotiin Aldeburghiin ilman tulevaisuudennäkymiä ja hänellä oli hyvin vähän tietoa parantamisen taidosta. Hänen kotinsa oli onneton äitinsä sairauden sekä isänsä hillittömyyden ja väkivaltaisen luonteen vuoksi. Näiden vuosien aikana raudan on täytynyt päästä hänen sieluunsa. Hän yritti harjoittaa ammattiaan Aldeburghissa, ja hänet nimitettiin seurakunnan lääkäriksi. Sillä välin hän kuitenkin opiskeli luontoa ja varsinkin kasvitiedettä tuloksin, jotka, elleivät häntä lääkärinä palvelisi, olisivat hänen runoudelleen suuri arvo. Hän jatkoi paljon lukemista ja pohdiskelua, ja hänen mielensä kääntyi ehdottomasti uskon ja hurskauden puoleen. Sarah Elmy oli hänen lohdutuksensa ja toivonsa (monia vuosia myöhemmin eräässä Tarinassa nimeltä The Lover's Journey hän kirjoitti kuuluisan kuvauksen vierailustaan hänen luonaan); ja hän jatkoi runojen kirjoittamista, josta vähän on säilynyt. Vuosiin 1775–1779 kuuluu useita uskonnollisia runoja, vaikuttava pieni pala Mirristä joka kertoo, kuinka hän veti kirjailijan "väärien nautintojen" helpotuksesta "ylevämpiin käsityksiin", ja tyhjä säeteos nimeltä Midnight, joka, joskin hyvin synkkä, päättyy järkevään ja vahvaan rohkeuteen.
    ellauri362.html on line 439: Lopulta hän ei kestänyt elämää Aldeburghissa enää. Vuoden 1779 lopulla hän päätti panostaa kaikkensa kirjallisuuteen Lontoossa, ja huhtikuussa 1780 hän lähti pääministerin sukulaisen Dudley Northin avustuksella Slaughdenin laiturilta. Lontoossa hän asui Royal Exchangen läheisyydessä, lähellä Cornhillissä asuneita Miss Elmyn ystäviä, ja ryhtyi tarkistamaan muutamaa näytelmää ja joitain mukanaan tuomiaan proosaesseitä opiskellessaan kasvitiedettä ja entomologiaa Lontoon ympärillä ja pitää Mirrille osoitettua päiväkirjaa. Vuosi oli hänelle köyhyyden ja pettymyksen vuosi. Niiden runojen joukossa, joita hän yritti julkaista, epäonnistui, olivat kirje hänen suosikkipaketeissaan prinssi Williamille (myöhemmin William IV), satiirinen kirje paholaisesta (ilmeisesti tarkistettu versio aikaisemmasta runosta, Ihmiskunnan viholliset) ja Mirrille osoitettu kirje, joissa molemmissa hän käyttää anapaestia. Yksikään julkaisija ei hyväksynyt näitä runoja niiden kirjoittajan purevasta esittelystä huolimatta salanimellä "Martinus Scriblerus". Lordit North, Shelburne ja Thurlow, yksi toisensa jälkeen, kuuntelivat kirjailijaa kuuroilla korvilla vaikka hänen säkeistyksensä Shelburnelle ansaitsi jonkinlaisen palkinnon. Ja kun hän luultavasti elokuussa 1780 löysi kirjapainon, joka halusi painaa kaksisataaviisikymmentä kopiota toisesta runosta, se ei tuonut hänelle muuta kuin yhden tai kaksi vähäistä arvostelua. Crabbe, joka useissa tämän aikakauden teoksissa kuvailee omia tunteitaan ja tilaansa, lähetti tämän jälkeen "Kuukausikatsauksen tekijöille" jakeisen kirjeen, jossa hän käytännössä pyytää heitä neuvomaan, pitäisikö hänen jatkaa runoudessa vai ei, antaen muuten itselleen satiirisia neuvoja menestykseen johtavista menetelmistä. Runossa ei ole mitään ihmeellistä paitsi idean hämmästyttävä yksinkertaisuus. Crabbe ei pitänyt viinamäen miehistä, koska sen isäpaskiainen oli ollut sellainen.
    ellauri362.html on line 493: ja kaikki vihreästä kauhistuttamattomasta.
    ellauri362.html on line 609: Pahis kesytetty ja tyydyttämätön typerys;
    ellauri362.html on line 735: Analysis (ai): This poem delves into the intoxicating effects of alcohol and its profound impact on human behavior. It begins by addressing the mighty spirit of inebriation, emphasizing its ability to influence the body and mind. The poet invites those who have succumbed to its allure to share their experiences and shed light on the reasons behind their indulgence.
    ellauri362.html on line 737: The poem vividly portrays the desolation of winter, with its barren landscapes, frozen streams, and harsh weather conditions. This imagery serves as a metaphor for the effects of alcohol on the human spirit. Just as winter chills and hardens the earth, alcohol numbs the senses, dulls the intellect, and stifles emotions.
    ellauri362.html on line 741: The poem also touches upon the supernatural beliefs and superstitions that often accompany drunkenness. Colin, the prince of joke and rural wits, regales his companions with tales of spirits, fairies, and otherworldly beings, reflecting the altered state of consciousness induced by alcohol.
    ellauri362.html on line 743: The poem reaches its climax with a scene of domestic violence, where a drunken husband returns home and engages in a heated argument with his wife. The ensuing chaos and destruction are reminiscent of a battlefield, with insults hurled like weapons and tempers flaring out of control.
    ellauri362.html on line 778: Esim. että on idealistinen ja teleologinen virhe ajatella, että historiassa on yleisiä lakeja ja että sosiaaliset suhteet määräytyvät samalla tavalla kuin fyysiset suhteet. Eine määräydy, ne on pelkkiä päähänpistoja.
    ellauri364.html on line 56: Hysteria (kreik. hystera 'kohtu') on historiallinen tautinimike, joka jaettiin myöhemmin kahteen alaluokkaan hysteeriseksi neuroosiksi ja konversiohysteriaksi. Hysteerinen neuroosi nimettiin uudelleen somatisaatiohäiriöksi, ja nykyisin siitä käytetään nimitystä somatisaatiohäiriö (F45.0). Konversiohysteria nimettiin uudelleen konversiohäiriöksi, jota nimikettä käytetään edelleen suomalaisessa psykiatriassa, vaikka sairauden virallinen nimi on muuttunut dissosiaatiohäiriöksi (F44). Osa lääkäreistä on ruvennut kutsumaan hysteriaa psykogeeniseksi, toiminnalliseksi tai ihan vaan lääketieteellisesti selittämättömäksi häiriöksi.
    ellauri364.html on line 62: Aikaisin dokumentoitu hysteria oli Egyptissä 1900-luvulla eaa. Egyptiläiset uskoivat, että hysteria johtuisi kohdun näivettymisestä tai liikkumisesta väärään asentoon. Hysterian saatettiin katsoa johtuvan myös liian ohuista hermoista tai mustasta sapesta. Sukupuolielimiin liittyvät teoriat hylättiin ja hysterialla alettiin tarkoittaa erilaisia ruumiillisia oireita, joille ei löytynyt selvää somaattista syytä. Tästä syystä niiden ajateltiin olevan psykiatrisen häiriön oireita. Vuonna 1859 Paul Briquet määritteli hysterian koomisena syndroomana, joka aiheuttaa useita selittämättömiä oireita ympäri vartaloa [lähde?] Ainakin epilepsiaa ja syfilistä pidettiin historiallisesti hysteriasta johtuvina sairauksina, koska niille ei kyetty löytämään muuta selitystä. Lääkärin kuppainen kyrpä ei kelvannut selityxexi.
    ellauri364.html on line 98: Kynäilijöiden sairaskertomuxet eli patografiat ovat herättäneet paljon pahaa verta, varsinkin eräiden kirjallisuushistorioitsijoiden keskuudessa, kun on ollut kysymys runoilijoista. On puhuttu psykologisista kamaripalvelijoista yms. Mitään objektiivista, asian luonteen mukaista muistutusta aihetta vastaan ei ole kuitenkaan voitu esittää.
    ellauri364.html on line 113: Helwegin Kierkegaard-patografian avaintermejä ovat
    assessor Barn barndommen begynder bestandig betydning dagbogen dementia depression depressive derfor død egentlig Enten-Eller ethiske faderen fald finde Forfatter-Virksomhed forhold forlovelsen forstaaet fortsætter Frygt Frygt og Bæven H. C. Andersen hende holde homosexualitet hvorledes imidlertid jordrystelsen journal konstitution kristendommen kærlighed kønssygdom lade lidelse lidenskab lige ligesom lægge længe læse mand manio-depressive maniske Menneske Mynster Maade maaske maatte N. F. S. Grundtvigs neppe Nero netop næsten opfattelse optegnelse P. A. Heiberg pathologiske person psykologisk psykose refleksion Regine Regine Olsen religiøse udvikling sandt seer senere sexuelle sidste Sindssvaghed sindssygdom sindstilstand sjælelige skriver stemning stærkt sygdom sygelige synd synes syphilis sætte søge Søren Kierkegaard saadan saaledes tanke tankegang tungsindet tvivl tænker udtryk ulykkelig umiddelbare veed vejen Verden virkelig viser vist ægteskabet øjeblik Aand.

    ellauri364.html on line 190: Tässä artikkelissa kuvataan Verocayn ruumiin ja Antonin A- ja B-alueiden rakenne ja ulkonäkö sekä lyhyt elämäkertainen esittely miehistä, jotka kuvasivat näitä malleja.
    ellauri364.html on line 200: Verocaylla oli aina erittäin vahva halu palata takaisin syntymämaahansa, ja hän auttoi jo vuonna 1905 suunnittelemaan patologisen anatomian instituuttia Uruguayn pääkaupungin Montevideon yliopistolle. Vaikka hän oli erittäin pätevä alalla, hän jäi huomiotta instituutin johtajan virkaan. Vuonna 1910 hän lahjoitti erinomaisen yli 200 näytteen kokoelmansa sekä yksityiskohtaiset histologisia ja ruumiinavausmenetelmiä koskevat muistiinpanot instituutille, joka muodosti patologian opetusmateriaalin ytimen. Hän jopa tarjoutui työskentelemään instituutissa yleislääkärinä, mutta häntä nuhdeltiin sanomalla, että hän ei ollut koskaan työskennellyt Uruguayssa ja hänet tunnettiin Prahasta Verocayna. Pettynyt hän jatkoi työskentelyä Euroopassa, mutta kieltäytyi jatkuvasti pysyvästä toimesta, mikä merkitsisi Uruguayn kansalaisuuden luopumista. Lopulta vuonna 1919, isänsä kuoleman jälkeen, Verocay palasi Uruguayhin ensin Paso de Los Mellizosina tunnetulle maaseutualueelle Rio Negrossa, jossa hän harjoitteli ensihoidon lääkärinä, mutta meni seuraavana vuonna Paysanduun ja meni naimisiin Carlottan kanssa. Ruhr ja sai neljä lasta hänen kanssaan. Vaikka hänet nimitettiin patologian johtajaksi useisiin pienempiin sairaaloihin, häneltä evättiin neuropatologian johtajan virka Neurologian instituutissa, kunnes lopulta 8. maaliskuuta 1927 lääketieteellisen tiedekunnan johtokunta nimesi Neurologia instituutin jäsenet ja nimitti hänet neuropatologian johtajaksi. Verocay piti instituutin ensimmäiset huippujännät neuropatologian luennot aiheista Aivoverenvuoto ja -tukos" ja "Enkefaaliset, selkärangan ja hermokasvaimat."
    ellauri364.html on line 249: Hermostuneiden lasten käsittely on laaja ongelma. Luonteenvikoja on jo aivan pikkulapsilla. Pieneen vauvaan tepsii lavemangi (Olavi). Joskus voi probleemalapsikin osoittaa aivan hämmästyttävää mielenlujuutta, esim. melkein stoalaista kykyä sietää kipua. Suurinta levottomuutta herättävät sellaiset heikkoudet, jotka koskevat luonnetta ja jotka lapsilla useimmiten ilmenevät epärehellisyytenä. Laiskottelu ja muu tottelemattomuus eivät sinänsä ole niin vaarallisia, mutta keksityt tekosyyt ja selitykset tekevät nämä piirteet kovin ikäviksi. Ja kuitenkin on itsepäinen, järkevä uhma ilman pienintäkään kaunisteluviettiä oikeastaan vieläkin ikävämpää! Lapsi on lähempänä omaa luontoaan, jos hän väittää olevansa syytön. Lapsuusvuosien ylistetty mielikuvitus ilmenee etenkin toiveajatteluna, vaikeutena erottaa valhe totuudesta. Kaikkein eniten vanhemmat kauhistuvat, kun epärehellisyys tulee ilmi näpistelynä (Riitta). Nykyään kuitenkin tiedetään, ettei lapsen epäluotettavuuden eikä pikkuvalheiden tarvitse herättää sen suurempaa pelkoa. Useimmat pikku syntiset - ja niitä on paljon! - kasvavat täysin hyviksi yhteiskunnan jäseniksi, vaikkapa lihavixi kääntäjixi. Useimmat aikuiset eivät nimittäin myöskään ole niin kovin kykeneviä vastustamaan kiusauksia. He pystyvät vain hiukan paremmin arvostelemaan päämäärää, keinoja ja tilannetta. Ei tosin voida kieltää, että myös omatunto, eli pelisilmä, sanan varsinaisessa ja kunnioitettavassa merkityksessä, kehittyy meissä vähitellen kasvuvuosina. Ensimmäisiä spontaanisia eetillisiä tunteita näyttää olevan toveruus ja sen velvoitukset, jotka kehittyvät myöhemmällä lapsuuden iällä pelkän totunnaisen kuuliaisuu- den ja rangaistuksenpelon kauden jälkeen. Klaaniajattelu kehittyy, tit for tat, viranomaisille ei vasikoida.
    ellauri364.html on line 252: This article is not about the album by Blood, Sweat & Tears. For the song by the Beach Boys, see Child Is Father of the Man.
    ellauri364.html on line 400: panorauhassa sihisevässä nukkuvassa honkanummessa. älskogsro i vyssande sövande furumo.
    ellauri364.html on line 459: Darwinin äiti kuoli vuonna 1817, kun hän oli kahdeksanvuotias, vaikka Darwinilla oli ilmeisesti kaiken kaikkiaan onnellinen lapsuus ja hän rohkaisi häntä. Rempf uskoi, että Darwinin "täydellinen alistuminen" tyrannimaiselle isälle esti Darwinia ilmaisemasta vihaa isäänsä ja sitten myöhemmin muita kohtaan. Englantilainen psykiatri tohtori Rankine Good totesi: "Jos Darwin ei surmannut isäänsä lihassa, niin hän varmasti tappoi taivaallisen Isän luonnonhistorian alueella".
    ellauri364.html on line 489: Got his car door flung open

    ellauri364.html on line 532: Groom stands waitin' for his bride
    ellauri364.html on line 540: Where can his baby be

    ellauri364.html on line 579: Aihetta koskevasta perustutkimuksestaan ​​Diener sai lempinimen Dr. Happiness. Tutkijoita, joiden kanssa hän on työskennellyt, ovat E. Saarisen sielunkumppani Daniel Kahneman ja Martin "kukoistus" Seligman. He held Smiley's chair as Joseph R. Smiley, Distinguished Professor of Psychology at the University of Illinois sat on it :). Diener's wife Carol is a psychologist and attorney. His daughters Marissa and Mary Beth are psychologists, as is his son, Robert.
    ellauri365.html on line 42: --- By Guy and his canoeist friends.
    ellauri365.html on line 276: Leo Tolstoy used Maupassant as the subject for one of his essays on art: The Works of Guy de Maupassant. His stories are second only to Shakespeare in their inspiration of movie adaptations with films ranging from Stagecoach, Oyuki the Virgin and Masculine Feminine.
    ellauri365.html on line 280: "I cannot at all conceive in which century of history one could haul together such inquisitive and at the same time delicate psychologists as one can in contemporary Paris: I can name as a sample – for their number is by no means small, ... or to pick out one of the stronger race, a genuine Latin to whom I am particularly attached, Guy de Maupassant."
    ellauri365.html on line 283: William Saroyan wrote a short story about Maupassant in his 1971 book, Letters from 74 rue Taitbout or Don't Go But If You Must Say Hello To Everybody.
    ellauri365.html on line 285: Isaac Babel wrote a short story about him, "Guy de Maupassant." It appears in The Collected Stories of Isaac Babel and in the story anthology You’ve Got To Read This: Contemporary American Writers Introduce Stories that Held Them in Awe.
    ellauri365.html on line 287: Gene Roddenberry, in an early draft for The Questor Tapes, wrote a scene in which the android Questor employs Maupassant's theory that, "the human female will open her mind to a man to whom she has opened other channels of communications." In the script Questor copulates with a woman to obtain information that she is reluctant to impart. Due to complaints from NBC executives, this scene was never filmed.
    ellauri365.html on line 457: Han debuterade som författare år 1888 med en diktsamling som bröt med den då rådande svenska litterära traditionen med realism och naturalism, för att istället fokusera på romantik, individualism, sensualism och romantisering av den svenska stormaktshistorien, med särskilt fokus på de karolinska soldaternas öden. Färgglädjen och bejakandet av en munter sinnlighet gjorde starkt intryck och kom att bli stilbildande för flera andra svenska författare under 1890-talet och åren därefter. von Heidenstam kom därför att bli den främste företrädaren för dessa "nittiotalister" och hans böcker innehåller genomgående många nationella och historiska teman.
    ellauri365.html on line 459: Hans makor voro Emilia Uggla (1880–1893), Olga Wiberg (1896–1903) och Greta Sjöberg (1903–1906) samt övriga "partners" Ellen Belfrage och Kate Bang. He liked to bang nymphettes like so many of his colleagues.
    ellauri365.html on line 517: his_mother_Magda_in_1882.jpg/500px-Verner_von_Heidenstam%2C_Emilia_Uggla_and_his_mother_Magda_in_1882.jpg" />
    ellauri365.html on line 565: In truth he gave the final blow to the left-wing realistic school, enemy of all imagination, which was then dominant in Sweden and which since 1880 had darkened literature with its sadness and its gloom. This was the first manifestation of a new poetry in which free individuals, led only by the logic of their imagination, worshipped beauty and wealth for its own sake.
    ellauri365.html on line 567: By the time of the unfaithful third wife Greta, Heidenstam opened perspectives to an inner life. The time of hymns to voluptuousness is past; gravity, misogyny and sadness are now persistent moods. Sentiment and duty are appreciated at their just value and what is firmly rooted in the depths of the human personality finds itself intuitively explained. What is characteristic in this conception of life, born of noble and unhappy experiences, is a proud and tolerant virility which constitutes the very essence of the suffering, the hope, and the intoxication of the poet, and a newly acquired capacity to reach the spiritual world by mutual masturbation.
    ellauri365.html on line 574: The next aspect of Heidenstam’s development appeared in his patriotic poetry. He had discovered early that love for the ancestral wealth and for the home of one’s noble birth is what most strongly links man to life. His self-love finally suggested a patriotic delusion of grandeur and called forth this passionate demand: "No people may be greater than you; that is the goal, no matter what the cost."
    ellauri365.html on line 577: His cult for man was taking shape, and one finds traces of it in the work. This cult often includes the necessity to renew life through sacrifice and to aspire to a more elevated earthly existence, an idea which is opposed to love and the cult of woman and results logically in the exaltations of stories Sankt Göran och Fröken (1900) and Säven susar (1904) [Whispers in the Willows].
    ellauri365.html on line 579: There are many reasons why Heidenstams poetry should appeal particularly to American readers. the Swedish genius is closely akin to us; it has the same seriousness, the same vigor, the same nobility of feeling. Theodore Roosevelt in his Autobiography tells us that he found time to read and enjoy the works of Topelius. But we have to face the truth that most other well-informed American persons have never heard the name of a single Swedish poet.
    ellauri365.html on line 581: It was upon a field of combat that Heidenstam made his début with his first volume of poems in 1888. The old sentimentalism had largely disappeared and a fierce war was being waged between the extreme, unmitigated realists and the new, more vital idealists. Into this combat Heidenstam at once plunged on the side of the idealists along with two other distinguished poets, Gustaf Fröding and Oscar Levertin. Gösta was fat and crazy, Oscar Jewish. That left just Valter to fight the good fight.
    ellauri365.html on line 584: Back North, the self-centered man forgot his despondency by merging himself into the larger soul of his estate. To those familiar with his membership of the committee, it came as no surprise that in 1916 Heidenstam was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature. He is perhaps most like Browning. Above all things he abhors uninspired naturalism; "gray-weather moods," he calls it. Strindberg merely "let the cellar air escape through the house.", he said. He repudiates pessimism no less than sentimentalism. He wrestled with August for the deeper meaning of life. The imagery is often daring, as when a negro's lips are compared to the crimson gash on a foreskin. Heidenstam, though one of the most daringly earnest of poets, is sufficiently an artist to relieve his style by such touches of humor and of the deeper sort of romance. But atonement was repugnant to his manhood. He longs to be worthy of his heritage, to give his life for some damn cause. He believes it is only in moments of great exaltation that we really live. The best bit is where Verner dissuades his poor countrymen from whacking the filthy rich. Without his saying so, we feel in him the quality of St. Paul affirming: "I have fought the good fight, I have kept the faith."
    ellauri365.html on line 586: "Happiness is a woman's jewel," he says. It is the fighting optimist who inveighs against weighing men in a money-scale and dividing the head of the nation from its arse. That the man is not other than his work is borne witness to by all who know him. He is over six feet in height and powerfully built, with strongly-marked aquiline features. Heidenstam is said to resemble Byron also in having a poor ear for music.
    ellauri365.html on line 631: I början av sitt eget författarskap på 1880-talet var Levertin liksom August Strindberg en del av den unga naturalismen, men han blev starkt påverkad av den romantiska och bakåtblickande tonen i Verner von Heidenstams första diktsamling Vallfart och vandringsår (1888). Levertin och Heidenstam kritiserade naturalismen i en gemensam pamflett, Pepitas bröllop (1890), och trots att Levertin i motsats till många generationskamrater aldrig övergav sin vetenskapligt materialistiska historiesyn skulle han från denna tid och framåt skriva romantiska dikter med medeltidsteman men utan svensk nazism. I motsats till muskulöse Valter var Oscar en tuberkulotisk liten stackare. Under sina sista dagar drabbades Oscar av halsfluss, och hans läkare ordinerade ett särskilt slags gurgelvatten. När Levertin sedan, omtöcknad av sjukdomen, steg upp mitt i natten för att dricka ett glas vatten, svalde han i stället av misstag ett glas gurgelvatten, drabbades av en allergisk reaktion, och avled.
    ellauri365.html on line 704: hans blod är en störtsjö i vårstormstider, Hänen veri kohisee kuin kevätjäät,
    ellauri367.html on line 93: 7. Edes kuninkailla ei ollut varaa rakentaa linnaansa ranskalaisella omaisuudellaan. He elävät mitä suurimmassa ylellisyydessä, ja linna, joka on myös heidän tilapäinen asuinpaikkansa, on niin suuri ja näyttävä, että useimmat siellä vierailleet ovat sanoneet, ettei kuninkaillakaan ole siihen varaa. Eivät ole edes käyneet kaikissa huoneissa! Mielenkiintoinen uskomaton historia!
    ellauri367.html on line 176: Hänellä on hallussaan nazi-Saxasta varastettuja maalauksia. Vihjataan, että hän oli kerran SS: ssä. Vaikka hänellä ja Oskar Schindlerillä oli paljon yhteistä, "Teimme molemmat natseille hissejä, mutta minun toimivat, hemmetti!".
    ellauri367.html on line 191: Rakovskin oikea nimi oli Krăstjo Stantšev. Hän syntyi Gradetsissa lähellä Kotelin kaupunkia Bulgariassa. Hänen isänsä oli varakas maanomistaja, jonka jättämän suuren perinnön turvin hän matkusteli ympäri maailmaa. Hän opiskeli vuosina 1890–1892 Genevessä Sveitsissä, mutta joutui pidätetyksi poliittisen toimintansa vuoksi. Hän tutustui jo Genevessä moniin maanpaossa eläneisiin venäläisiin vallankumouksellisiin, kuten Pavel Akselrodiin, Georgi Plehanoviin, Vera Zasulitšiin ja Rosa Luxemburgiin. Hän edusti Bulgariaa sosialistisen internationaalin kongresseissa Zürichissä 1893 ja Lontoossa 1896. Rakovski aloitti lääkärinopinnot Berliinissä, mutta joutui pian karkotetuksi Saksasta sosialistisen toimintansa vuoksi. Hän vei opintonsa loppuun Montpellier’n yliopistossa Ranskassa, ja valmistui lääkäriksi vuonna 1897. Hän suoritti vuosina 1899–1900 asepalveluksen Romanian armeijassa. Rakovski puhui useita keinotekoisia kieliä ja loi kansainvälisen uran vastavallankumouksellisena. Hän julkaisi eri maissa politiikkaa käsitteleviä teoksia käyttäen toisinaan kirjailijanimeä Inshallahov.
    ellauri367.html on line 214: Vuonna 1950 Espanjassa julkaistiin kirja Sinfonia en Rojo Mayor, jonka väitettiin sisältävän Rakowskin kuulustelupöytäkirjat, jotka NKVD:n lääkärihoitaja tietenkin Josef Landowsky todisti oikeixi. Kirja kiertää nimellä Red Symphony Internetin esoteerisilla tai äärioikeistolaisilla sivustoilla. Sitä lainataan yleensä vapaamuurarien ja juutalaisten maailman salaliittokonseptin perustelemiseksi. Tämän mukaan Wartburg- ja Rothschild- pankkien sanotaan rahoittaneen sekä Leniniä että Hitleriä. Brittiläinen historioitsija Antony C. Sutton todisti myöhemmin saman asian.
    ellauri367.html on line 267: Huolimatta jiddishin puolustamisesta, Esther on kiistanalainen hahmo juutalaisten historiassa. Teoksessa A Price under Rubies: Jewish Women as Rebels and Radicals Naomi Shepherd kirjoittaa, että "juutalaiset ihailivat tai vihasivat yhtäkään naista enemmän neuvostovallan ensimmäisen vaiheen aikana; yksikään nainen Itä-Euroopassa ei saavuttanut tällaista asemaa juutalaisten politiikassa."
    ellauri367.html on line 269: Puolan Bund jatkoi säälimätöntä kampanjaansa sionismia ja uskonnollista ortodoksisuutta vastaan. Bund vastusti jyrkästi heprean opetusta, mutta muutti hieman suhtautumistaan perinteisiin juutalaisiin juhlapäiviin ja juutalaisen historian opetukseen.
    ellauri367.html on line 303: Warburg-suku on huomattava saksanjuutalais-amerikkalainen talousvaltiassuku, tunnettu monista saavutuksistaan fysiikan, klassisen musiikin, taidehistorian, lääketieteen, talouden, kiinteistöalan ja ihmisyyden aloilla. Suvun arvellaan polveutuvan yhdestä Venetsian rikkaimmista suvusta, juutalaisesta del Banco -suvusta 1500-luvun alusta.
    ellauri368.html on line 45: Turns out the whole of Talmud is best understood as a a colossal joke. Until 1904, however, though this work was well under way, I was partially conscious of many important onussions. But verily I could say: "Who shall go over the sea for us and bring it unto us". From the river to the sea Palestine will be free.
    ellauri368.html on line 66: Among the Jews of the Slavonic countries "maskil" usually denotes a self-taught Hebrew scholar with an imperfect knowledge of a living language (usually German), who represents the love of learning and the striving for culture awakened by Mendelssohn and his disciples; i.e., an adherent or follower of the Haskalah movement. He is "by force of circumstances detained on the path over which the Jews of western Europe swiftly passed from rabbinical lore to European culture" and to emancipation, and "his strivings and short-comings exemplify the unfulfilled hopes and the disappointments of Russian civilization." The Maskilim are mostly teachers and writers; they taught a part of the young generation of Russian Jewry to read Hebrew and have created the great Neo-Hebrew literature which is the monument of Haskalah. Although Haskalah has now been flourishing in Russia for three generations, the class of Maskilim does not reproduce itself. The Maskilim of each generation are recruited from the ranks of the Orthodox Talmudists, while the children of Maskilim very seldom follow in the footsteps of their fathers. This is probably due to the fact that the Maskil who breaks away from strictly conservative Judaism in Russia, but does not succeed in becoming thoroughly assimilated, finds that his material conditions have not been improved by the change, and, while continuing to cleave to Haskalah for its own sake, he does not permit his children to share his fate. The quarrels between the Maskilim and the Orthodox, especially in the smaller communities, are becoming less frequent. In the last few years the Zionist movement has contributed to bring the Maskilim, who joined it almost to a man, nearer to the other classes of Jews who became interested in that movement. The numerous Maskilim who emigrated to the United States, especially after the great influx of Russian immigrants, generally continued to follow their old vocation of teaching and writing Hebrew, while some contributed to the Yiddish periodicals. Many of those who went thither in their youth entered the learned professions. See Literature, Modern Hebrew. (Source: Jewish Dictionary)
    ellauri368.html on line 160: Tyyny, joka tunnetaan myös nimellä Pielustarina (The Pillow Book), on yhdysvaltalainen tieteiskirjallisuusmediasarja, joka sai alkunsa Frank Herbertin vuoden 1965 romaanista Dune ja joka on jatkanut yhä uusien anodyynien julkaisujen lisäämistä. Dunea kuvataan usein historian myydyimmäksi tieteisromaaniksi. Se voitti ensimmäisen Nebula-palkinnon parhaasta romaanista ja Hugo-palkinnon vuonna 1966, ja myöhemmin se sovitettiin vuoden 1984 elokuvaksi, vuoden 2000 tv-minisarjaksi ja kaksiosaiseksi elokuvasarjaksi, jonka ensimmäinen elokuva vuonna 2021 ja jatko-osa vuonna 2024. Herbert kirjoitti viisi jatko-osaa, joista kaksi ensimmäistä mukautettiin samanaikaisesti vuoden 2003 minisarjaksi. Päänalunen on myös inspiroinut pöytäpelejä ja videopelejä. Vuodesta 2009 lähtien Dyyni-romaanien planeettojen nimet on otettu käyttöön Saturnuksen kuun Titanin tasangojen ja muiden ominaisuuksien todellisessa nimikkeistössä.
    ellauri368.html on line 176: Aavikkoplaneetan Arrakisin ympäristö on samanlainen kuin Lähi-idässä, erityisesti Arabian niemimaalla ja Persianlahdella sekä Meksikossa. Romaani sisältää myös viittauksia öljyteollisuuteen Persianlahden arabivaltioissa sekä Meksikossa. Arrakisin fremeneihin vaikuttivat Arabian beduiiniheimot, ja Mahdi-profetia on peräisin islamilaisesta eskatologiasta. Ruipelosta Paulista tulee pyhä Paavali, tai enemmänkin, Muad'dib eli Messias ja sillä se pääsee keon huipulle. Inspiraatiota on otettu myös keskiaikaisen historioitsija ibn Khaldunin syklisestä historiasta ja hänen dynastiasta Pohjois-Afrikassa, mistä vihjasi Herbertin viittaus ibn Khaldunin kirjaan Kitāb al-ʿIbar "Oppituntien kirja", joka tunnetaan fremenien keskuudessa.
    ellauri368.html on line 217: Ei ole myöskään liioiteltua sanoa, että lähes kaikki suuret Nykyaikaisen juutalaisen historian liikkeet on parodioitu. Hasidismi, uudisjuutalaisuus, sosialismi, sionismi ja monet muut Juutalaisen ajattelun pienet vaiheet - kaikki ovat tuoneet esiin omat parodistinsa. Toisaalta tämän juutalaisen kirjallisuuden haaran tutkiminen ature paljastaa myös juutalaisen huumorin vakavan puolen. Se tulee osoittavat, että juutalaisen satiirin leikkisyyden alla on surun virta on aina läsnä. Kyyneleet ja nauru valehtelevat hyvin lähellä juutalaista huumoria ja juutalaista parodistia. Hän ei ole aina pelkkä klovni, mutta sitä useammin hän on saarnaaja naamioitunut narrin pukuun. kuten yleinen parodia juutalainen parodialla on myös moraalinen päämäärä.
    ellauri368.html on line 288: He wrote the satire on his return to Judaism after an involuntary conversion.
    ellauri368.html on line 289: In his satire, he prefers to strike out right from the shoulder. Take, for instance, his exposure of the Carnival, which reads in part as follows:
    ellauri368.html on line 292: cannot be found. Men of intelligence and knowledge ate searched from one end of the earth to the other, but their place is unknown. The moral man — even his shadow is gone. Orators and poets have run away and joined the scooters. The pious have become impious, the shrewd have lost their senses in drink. . . Judges have gone wrong, honest men turned defaulters. Princes cheat and magistrates keep themselves in hiding. . ."
    ellauri368.html on line 296: Evidently, his satire lacks that subtle irony which made Profiat Duraii's Epistle so powerful, and at the same time gained for it such great popularity. Undoubtedly, it is due to this directness and plainness of speech, that this parody has never yet seen the light of day. About as humorous as this invective against J.N. somewhat earlier:
    ellauri368.html on line 298: Let the dead god cease, and forgotten be his memory, name and time of existence. Eternal perdition bequeathed be to fucking Nazarite who proclaimed his greatness and his dominion.
    ellauri368.html on line 303: When he (Scrooge McDuck) gave a coin in alms to a poor man, he shouted at him this: 'Why do you sit with thy hands folded? The sleep of the laborer is sweet; go, then, till the earth and live with the labor of thine own hands. Thy hands are not bound, nor are thy feet put into fetters. By Jehovah, all of you are poor, because you hold your hands akimbo. If you had in your possession all the gold of my money bin, you would squander it. Do you perhaps wait for manna to come down from beaven, as it did for those who went out of Egypt, or for the earth to bring forth white bread and garments of fine wool, colored and embroidered, or do you wait for God to open windows in heaven?
    ellauri368.html on line 305: As a parody, this work is certainly one of the cleverest, and as a satire, it would likewise have ranked with the best in Hebrew literature, if not for one characteristic which detracts
    ellauri368.html on line 306: a good deal from its merit. It abounds in too many profane and vulgar expressions. And while this characteristic is not uncommon in the literature of the middle ages, it nevertheless
    ellauri368.html on line 316: This work purports to be a genuine collection of letters by several hasidim, but it adopts the epistolary genre primary in order to expose corruption that Perl associated with the Hasidic movement.
    ellauri368.html on line 318: Hasidism was inspired by Israel ben Eliezer, who was eventually dubbed the Ba'al Shem Tov after he was "revealed" as a wonder-working leader in about 1736. He lived in the Ukraine, where there was a high density of provincial Jewish communities. Two generations after the death of this charismatic leader, his followers printed BeShT (In Praise of the Ba'al Shem Tov, 1815, a Hebrew work consisting primarily of hagiographie tales about wonders of the rebbe, as passed on and eaborated by his disciples. In the same year, stories by Nahman of Bratislav - a great-grandson of the Ba'al Shem Tov - were published by his scribe Nathan Sternharz. Accompanied by Yiddish versions, the Hebrew tales were intended to reach the broadest possible audience.
    ellauri368.html on line 320: Then came Perl, show inserted more than just a grain of sand into the happy oyster of hasidic life. Joseph Perl hailed from Tarnopol and became an erudite follower of the Jewish Enlightenment, or haskalah. He learned German and published an attack on the Hasidim in that language, Ueber das Wesen der Sekte Hasidim (on the essence of the Hasidic Sect, 1816). In so doing he aroused the ire of the hasidim; Perl encodes both his scorn and their fury into his epistolary novel, Revealer of Secrets. The plot of Revealer of Secrets revolves around an offensive anti-hasidic book in German, which is evidently Perl's own tract dating from 1816. The hasidic characters in Revealer of Secrets plot to find and destroy the offending book; in the course of their fictional search, they reveal many of the baser traits that Perl attacked in his 1816 essay.
    ellauri368.html on line 322: From a literary-historical standpoint, Revealer of Secrets holds immense interest. As Dov Taylor notes in his useful introduction, it was inspired by the eighteenth-century epistolary tradition initiated in England by Samuel Richardson's Pamela (1740), in France by Rousseau's Nouvelle Héloïse (1760), and in Germany by Goethe's Die Leiden des jungen Werthers (1774). Because Hebrew had as yet no novelistic tradition, Perl necessarily drew upon the prevailing norms of European fiction. Thus arose the beginning of modern Hebrew literature in the margins of eighteenth-century fiction
    ellauri368.html on line 325: Revealer of Secrets merits immense respect among readers of Judaic literature. With it Perl not only inaugurated a new branch of Hebrew writing but also entered the fray that was raging between enlightened maskilim and inspired hasidim , taking aim against corruption through sophisticated comic parodies. According to tradition, Perl's parody was so convincing that hasidic readers initially assumed that Revealer of Secrets was a genuine hasidic work. This impression was furthered by the presence of innumerable scholarly and pseudo-scholarly footnotes adorning the text.
    ellauri368.html on line 327: Revealer of Secrets is particularly pertinent at the end of the twentieth century. We seem to be post-everything in this fin-de-siècle twilight of the millennium. Our age is called post-War, post-Shoah, post-Soviet Union, post-Cold War, and maybe even post Zionist. Aaron Lansky calls the new building for the National Yiddish Book Center "heymish modern," but others will say that it is post-shtetl or post-modern. In our crowded post-age obsessed by imitation, influence, and parody, the time is right for a rediscovery of Joseph Perl's masterful parody of hasidic writing.
    ellauri368.html on line 331: Hasidism began in the late 1850s under Ukrainian Rabbi Ba'al Shem Tov. His followers published a collection of stories about his life, Shivhei ha-Besht (ln Praise of the Ba'al Shem Tov), in 1815.
    ellauri368.html on line 335: In 1819 he continued his writings against Hasidism by publishing a novel about the subject. In the novel, characters search for the original copy of a recently published anti-Hasidic book. The novel was originally published anonymously.
    ellauri368.html on line 339: The novel used the epistolary tradition of European novels such as Samuel Richardson's Pamela and brought this style into Jewish literature. Perl also made use of scholarly and pseudo-scholarly footnotes throughout the novel.
    ellauri368.html on line 341: It is an unusual book in that it satirizes the language and style of early hasidic rabbis writing in Hebrew, which was not the vernacular of the Jews of its time. To make his work available and accessible to his contemporaries, Perl translated his own work into Yiddish. It is currently in print only in an English translation, by Dov Taylor, published by Westview Press.
    ellauri368.html on line 420: Venäjä on tiedottanut, että Ukrainan armeijan tekemissä iskuissa loukkaantui kaksi, mutta ketään ei kuollut. Venäjälle tämänkaltaiset hyökkäykset ovat nöyryyttäviä. Brittitiedustelun arvion mukaan Venäjä käyttää hyväkseen tilannetta kertomalla maailmalle olevansa länsiterrorismin uhri. Kummankin venäläisryhmän viimeinen päivitys pyytää antamaan toiminnalleen raha-avustusta. Help Ukraina to win this war!
    ellauri369.html on line 43: Ei esimerkiksi herättänyt lainkaan pahennusta, että Kimon, sangen huomattava ateenalainen, oli naimisissa sisarpuolensa kanssa, koska kerran hänen kansansa keskuudessa oli sellainen tapa. Meidän oloissamme sellainen kuitenkin olisi kauhistus. Kreetassa luetaan nuorukaisille sitä suuremmaksi kunniaksi, mitä useampia rakastajia heillä on ollut. Spartassa ei kukaan naimaton nainen ole niin ylhäinen, ettei voisi palkkaa vastaan mennä kemuhin viihdyttäjäksi. Jokseenkin koko Kreikassa pidettiin suuressa kunniassa sitä, joka julistettiin Olympian voittajaksi ja toisaalta ei näiden sanojen kansojen keskuudessa ollut kenellekään häpeäksi esiintyä näyttämöllä kaiken kansan nähtävänä. Meillähän tällaista pidetään joko paheksuttavana tai ainakin alentavana ja kaikkea muuta kuin kunniakkaana.
    ellauri369.html on line 45: Päinvastoin taas, meidän kannaltamme katsoen ovat aivan asianmukaisia monet seikat, joita kreikkalaiset pitävät sopimattomina. Ketāpā roomalaista hävettäisi tuoda vaimonsa pitoihin tai missä talon emäntä pysyttelisi poissa asunnon tärkeimmistä huoneista eikä tapaisi muita ihmisiä? Aivan toisin on laita Kreikassa; siellä näet nainen voi osallistua vain sukulaisten keskisiin kutsuihin eikä hän saa oleskella muualla talossa kuin sen sisimmässä, gynaikonitis-nimisessä osassa, jonne on pääsy ainoastaan lähisukulaisilla. Mutta tämän enempää en tässä voi esitellä näitä hullunkurisia seikkoja; siitä minua estää sekä teokseni koko että kiire päästä käsittelemään alkamaani aihetta. Saavun nyt siis itse tehtäväni ääreen ja esitän tässä kirjassani kuuluisien ulkomaalaisten suurmiesten elämäkertoja.
    ellauri369.html on line 57: Paleofiktio on esihistoriallista aikaa kuvaava kirjallisuuden lajityyppi. Termin kehitti suomalainen paleontologi Björn Kurtén kuvaamaan esihistorialliseen aikaan sijoittuvia romaanejaan Den svarta tigern (1978; suom. Musta Tiikeri, 1981) ja Mammutens rådare (1984; suom. Mammutin suojelija, 1984). Paleofiktio muistuttaa historiallista romaania kertoessaan menneistä ajoista, mutta sen kuvaamista tapahtumista ei ole säilynyt kirjallisia lähteitä nykypäivään. Tämän vuoksi paleofiktion kirjoittajan on mahdollista käsitellä aihettaan paljon vapaammin kuin historiallisen romaanin kirjoittajan, ja lajityypillä onkin yhteyksiä myös fantasiakirjallisuuteen ja muuhun spekulatiiviseen fiktioon.
    ellauri369.html on line 60: Charles George Douglas Roberts (10. tammikuuta 1860 - 26. marraskuuta 1943) oli kanadalainen runoilija ja kirjailija. Häntä pidetään kanadalaisen runouden isänä, ja hän oli ensimmäisiä kansainvälisen maineen saavuttaneita kanadalaisia kirjailijoita. Suomessa Roberts tunnetaan eläintarinoistaan ja luonnonhistoriaa käsittelevistä romaaneistaan.
    ellauri369.html on line 62: Robertsin teoksista on ilmestynyt suomeksi esihistoriallisen ajan eläimistä kertova Ihmiselon aamuna - romaani maailman aamuhämärästä (Kirja, 1921) Alli Niemisen suomentamana, ja myöhemmin lyhennettynä nimellä Tulen löytäjät.
    ellauri369.html on line 76: Roney jakaa "fantastisen kirjoituksensa" tieteiskirjallisuuteen (termiä ei vielä ollut olemassa) ja esihistoriallista menneisyyttä käsitteleviin romaaneihin, kuten Vamirah (1892) jota pidettiin ensimmäisenä todellisena esihistoriallisena romaanina.
    ellauri369.html on line 78: Esihistoriallisiin" teemoihin liittyivät romaanit Vamireh (1892) ja Eirimah (1893) kirjoitettiin yhdessä sekä useita novelleja, sekä esihistoriallisia (esim. "Kiyamon syvyydet", 1896) että tieteiskirjallisuutta (" Toinen maailma", 1898 jne.). Kun veljet riitelivät (virallinen syy oli luonne-erot), nousi kaksi erillistä kirjoittajaa - Roni Jr. ja Roni Sr. Vuonna 1908 Rosny-veljekset lopettivat julkaisemisen yhdessä. Seniori oli Goncourt-akatemian puheenjohtaja vuosina 1926–1940, jolloin juniori otti tämän tehtävän.
    ellauri369.html on line 82: Rosny aîné oli hyvin HG Wellsin tai Olaf Stapledonin kaltainen konseptiltaan ja tavaltaan käsitellä niitä romaaneissaan. Hän oli toiseksi tärkein hahmo Jules Vernen jälkeen modernin ranskalaisen science fictionin historiassa.
    ellauri369.html on line 93: Satunnainen pornomies : Ivankat sattuu pitämään Naohista ja lähettävät suurimman osan naisistaan ​​hänen mökkiinsä seksiä varten, mikä suuren hämmennyksen aiheuttaa. (Ivankat pariutuu kasvotusten, eikä Naoh ymmärrä, miksi ensimmäinen nainen makaa kasvot ylöspäin, ennen kuin hiän lopulta saa kiinni juonesta ja kääntyy nelinkontilleen.)
    ellauri369.html on line 113: Benjamin on miehen etunimi. Nimi on peräisin hepreasta ja tarkoittaa oikean käden poikaa tai onnenpoikaa. Raamatun Vanhassa Testamentissa Benjamin on laajan suvun kantaisä, joka syntyi Beetelin eteläpuolella. Benjamin oli patriarkka Jaakobin ja Raakelin nuorin poika sekä heistä polveutunut Israelin heimo. Benjaminin vanhempi veli oli Joosef, jonka historiaan Benjamin on läheisesti yhteydessä.
    ellauri369.html on line 158: Gaius Sallustius Crispus, tavallisesti englantilainen Sallust, oli roomalainen historioitsija ja poliitikko plebeijiläisperheestä. Todennäköisesti Amiternumissa sabiinien maassa syntynyt Sallustista tuli Julius Caesarin (100-44 eKr.) partisaani noin 50-luvulla eaa.
    ellauri369.html on line 161: Hän on varhaisin tunnettu latinankielinen roomalainen historioitsija, jonka nimellä on säilynyt teoksia, joista ovat jäljellä Catilinan salaliitto (samanimisestä salaliitosta), Jugurttisota (samannimisestä sodasta) ja Histories (joista on säilynyt vain katkelmia). Kirjailijana Sallust sai vaikutteita ensisijaisesti 5. vuosisadalla eKr. kreikkalaisen historioitsijan Thukydideen teoksist. Poliittisen uransa aikana hän keräsi suurta ja väärin hankittua rikkautta Afrikan kuvernöörikaudeltaan, joilla se rakensi puutarhoja. E. Saarisen pojan Jeromen mukaan Sallustista tuli myöhemmin Ciceron entisen vaimon Terentian toinen aviomies. Tunnetut roomalaisen pornografian tutkijat, kuten Ronald Syme, uskovat kuitenkin tämän olevan urbaani legenda. Procopiuksen mukaan kun Alaricin tunkeutuva armeija saapui Roomaan, he polttivat Sallustin talon. Että sellanen tallustaja.
    ellauri369.html on line 172: Nepos kirjoitti ennen kaikkea historiaa proosamuodossa. Häntä ei ole pidetty erityisen suurena kirjailijana, vaan ennen kaikkea anekdoottien kokoajana. Joka tapauksessa hänen tuotantonsa kuvaa hyvin Rooman tasavallan ajan lopun kulttuurielämää. Nepos kirjoitti proosan lisäksi myös ajan tavan mukaisia rakkausrunoja, joita luettiin lähipiirille. Nepoksen teokset ovat suurimmaksi osaksi onnexi kadonneet. Mulla pitäisi olla mun Cornelius Nepos vielä jossakin. Teoksen ensimmäinen K. M. Forsbergin tekemä suomennos ilmestyi vuonna 1856. Uudempi Marja Itkosen tekemä suomennos julkaistiin vuonna 1963, jolloin pääsin Norssiin 93 pyrkyripisteellä sadasta. Pisteluku kaiverrettiin pääsyn kunniaxi saamani kellon taaxe.
    ellauri369.html on line 174: Historioitsijana Neposta pidetään epäluotettavana ja epäobjektiivisena. Elämäkerrat ovat ylimalkaisia, hänen aineistossaan korostuvat anekdootit, hänen kronologioissaan on suuria ongelmia, ja hän sortuu usein läpinäkyvään liioitteluun pyrkiessään kuvamaan jokaisen henkilön ainutlaatuisena sankarina. Näin hän on enemmän ajanvietekirjailija kuin varsinainen historioitsija. Hänen kirjallista tyyliään on luonnehdittu toisaalta selkeäksi, toisaalta yksitoikkoiseksi ja värittömäksi. Kielenkäyttö poikkeaa usein Ciceron huisin hyvästä latinasta.
    ellauri369.html on line 230: Mohammad Ismail Zarei, Salman Rushdien teloittamista koskevan Khomeinin fatwan täytäntöönpanon sihteeristön johtaja, sanoi maanantaina, että "Kiitämme vilpittömästi nuorta amerikkalaista hänen rohkeasta toimistaan ​​imaami Khomeinin historiallisen fatwan toteuttamisessa."
    ellauri369.html on line 285: Jansenin mukaan ensimmäinen jumala al-Lat tarkoittaa "jumalatarta". Toinen jumaluus, Manat, tarkoittaa kohtalotarta ja löytyy myös Raamatusta muodossa Meni jo (Jesaja 65:11). Kolmas nimi Al-Uzza tarkoittaa "mahtavin" ja on nähtävästi myös Venus-planeetan nimitys. Islamilainen kirjallisuus ei valitettavasti kerro enempää näistä jumalista ja siitä, miten heitä palvottiin, kun Mekassa vielä vallitsi jahiliyyah. Jahiliyyah (Arab. ‏جَاهِلِيَّة‎‎ dzāhilīyyah, "tietämättömyys", "barbaria") eli tietämättömyyden aika on islamilainen käsite, joka tarkoittaa oloja, jotka vallitsivat Arabian niemimaalla ennen kuin Koraani alkoi laskeutua profeetta Muhammedille vuodesta 610 lähtien, ja ennen kuin hän aloitti julkisen valistustyönsä kolme vuotta myöhemmin. "Jahiliyyah" esiintyy Koraanissa muutaman kerran, ja tällöin se on suomennettu "pakanuudeksi" (33:33 5:50; 48:26). Sanaa käytetään nykyisin myös tarkoittamaan modernia tietämättömyyttä tai luopumista Allahista (esim. Salman Rushdie)..
    ellauri369.html on line 294: Thomas Carlyle (4. joulukuuta 1795 – 5. helmikuuta 1881) oli skotlantilainen esseisti, historioitsija ja filosofi Skotlannin alamailta. Viktoriaanisen aikakauden johtava kynäilijä, hän vaikutti syvästi 1800-luvun taiteeseen, kirjallisuuteen ja filosofiaan. Erittäinkin syvältä.
    ellauri369.html on line 296: Edinburghissa perusopiskelijana Carlyle kexi ympyrän. Howard Evesin (1911–2004) mukaan matemaatikko John Leslie (1766–1832) kuvasi neliöyhtälön juurten geometrista rakennetta ympyrällä kirjassaan Elements of Geometry ja huomautti, että tämän idean antoi hänen entinen hallijärjestäjänsä Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881). Eves kusettaa tässä aika rankasti. Vaikka Leslien kirjan kuvaus sisältää analogisen ympyrärakenteen, se esitettiin vain alkeisgeometrisin termein ilman mitään käsitystä karteesisesta koordinaattijärjestelmästä tai neliöfunktiosta ja sen juurista.
    ellauri369.html on line 309: Carlylen varhaiskasvatus tuli hänen äidiltään, joka opetti hänelle lukemista (huolimatta siitä, että hiän oli tuskin lukutaitoinen), ja hänen isänsä opetti hänelle laskennan (huolimatta siitä että käytti siihen sekä sormia että varpaita). Tämän jälkeen hän meni Annan Akatemiaan ( n.  1806–1809 ), jossa hän opiskeli alkeellista kreikkaa, luki sujuvasti latinaa ja ranskaa ja opiskeli aritmetiikkaa "aivan hyvin". Häntä kiinnosti matematiikka ja geometria ja osoitti suurta lahjakkuutta näissä aiheissa, Carlyle-ympyrän keksimisen ansiosta. Yliopiston kirjastossa hän luki monia tärkeitä teoksia 1700-luvun ja nykyajan historiasta, filosofiasta ja kauniista kirjeistä. Carlyle aloitti opettamisen Annan Academyssa kesäkuussa 1814. Hän piti ensimmäiset koesaarnansa joulukuussa 1814 ja joulukuussa 1815, jotka molemmat ovat kadonneet.
    ellauri369.html on line 316: historian_Thomas_Carlyle.jpg/340px-Jane_Baillie_Welsh%2C_Mrs_Thomas_Carlyle%2C_1801_-_1866._Wife_of_the_historian_Thomas_Carlyle.jpg" />
    ellauri369.html on line 319: Helmi- ja maaliskuussa hän käänsi Jöns Jacob Berzeliuksen teoksen kun Jöns ei kazonut, ja syyskuussa hän "luki Goethea ". Marraskuussa hän ilmoittautui "skotlannin oikeuden luokkaan " ja opiskeli David Humen (asianajaja) johdolla. Joulukuussa 1819 ja tammikuussa 1820 Carlyle teki toisen julkaisuyrityksensä kirjoittamalla arvosteluartikkelin Marc-Auguste Pictet'n kazauksesta Jean-Alfred Gautier'n teoxeen Essai historique sur le problème des trois corps, joka jäi julkaisematta ja kadonnut. Oikeustieteen luokat päättyivät maaliskuussa 1820, eikä hän jatkanut aihetta enempää.
    ellauri369.html on line 329: Hoddam Hillissä Carlyle löysi hengähdystauon Edinburghissa kokemastaan "siestämättömästä tuskasta, melusta ja hämmennyksestä" ja havaitsi ikkunasta jotain mitä hän kuvaili "parhaimmaksi ja laajimmaksi näkymäksi, jonka olen koskaan nähnyt mistä tahansa talosta, Cumberland kuin amfiteatterissa vertaansa vailla". Täällä hän suoritti "Kääntymisensä", joka alkoi Leith Walk -tapahtumasta. Hän saavutti "suuren ja ikuisesti iloisen voiton" kaikista hengellisistä lohikäärmeistä, lopullisesta kahlituksesta ja tallasi kotiin, terve menoa kotiin luoliinnne ikuisesti!
    ellauri369.html on line 334: Nimittäin lokakuussa 1826 Thomas ja Jane Welsh menivät naimisiin Walesin perheen tilalla Templandissa. Pian avioliiton jälkeen Carlyles muutti vaatimattomaan kotiin Comely Bankissa Edinburghissa, jonka Janen äiti oli vuokrannut heille. He asuivat siellä lokakuusta 1826 toukokuuhun 1828. Siihen aikaan Carlyle julkaisi saksalaisen romanssin , aloitti Wotton Reinfredin , omaelämäkerrallisen romaanin, jonka myös hän jätti kesken, ja julkaisi ensimmäisen artikkelinsa Edinburgh Review -julkaisuun , "Jean Paul Friedrich Richter" (1827). Se ei juuri meulaa heilauttanut Richterin asteikolla. Johann Paul Friedrich Richter, kirjailijanimi: Jean Paul (21. maaliskuuta 1763 Wunsiedel − 14. marraskuuta 1825 Bayreuth) oli saksalainen kirjailija josta lienee jo paasattu. Monet lukijat, etenkin Richterin naispuoliset ihailijat, uskoivat vilpittömästi, että Richter ja fiktiivinen Jean Paul olivat todella sama henkilö. Richteristä tuli hyvin kuuluisa, ja legendoja hänen epätoivoisten naisihailijoidensa tempauksista löytyy edelleen elämäkertakirjallisuudesta. Totta lienee ainakin se, että Richterillä oli useita kosijoita ja hän oli kihloissa useita kertoja ennen avioliittoaan Karoline Meyerin kanssa 1801. Kyllä pettyivät sillä oikea Richter oli aika pyllynaamainen.
    ellauri369.html on line 338: Vuonna 1827 Carlyle yritti saada moraalifilosofian katedraalin St. Andrewsissa menestymättä huolimatta useiden merkittävien intellektuellien, kuten Goethen, tuesta. Hän teki myös epäonnistuneen yrityksen professuuriksi Lontoon yliopistossa. Toukokuussa 1828 Carlylet muuttivat Craigenbuttockiin, Janen vaatimattoman maataloustilan piharakennukseen Dumfriesshiressä, jossa he asuivat toukokuuhun 1834 asti. Hän kirjoitti siellä useita esseitä, jotka ansaitsivat hänelle rahaa ja lisäsivät hänen mainettaan, mukaan lukien "Elämäni" ja "Wernerin kirjoitukset ", "Goethen Helena", "Goethe", " Palovammat ", " Heynen elämä " (jokainen 1828), "Saksalaiset näytelmäkirjailijat", " Voltaire ", "Novalis " (kukin 1829), "Jean Paul Friedrich Richter Again" (1830), "Cruthers ja Jonson eli Elämän reunat: tositarina", " Lutherin psalmi " ja "Schiller" (kukin 1831). Hän aloitti, mutta ei suorittanut loppuun saksalaisen kirjallisuuden historiaa, josta hän ammentaa materiaalia esseitä " Nibelungit valehtelee ", "Varhainen saksalainen kirjallisuus" ja osia "Historial Survey of German Poetry" -kirjoituksesta (kukin 1831). Ihme tunari.
    ellauri369.html on line 353: Sartor Resartus: The Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdröckh in Three Books is an 1831 novel by the Scottish essayist, historian and philosopher Thomas Carlyle. Räätälinlihas (lat. musculus sartorius < lat. sartor, räätäli) on pitkä ja kapea, heikko lihas, jonka alkukohta on suoliluun päällä sijaitseva kalvo, fascia iliaca, ja päätekohta sääriluun yläosan sisäsivu. Sitä hermottaa reisihermo (nervus femoralis). Räätälinlihaksen tehtävänä on koukistaa lonkka- ja polviniveltä. Räätälinlihas kulkee vinosti muiden reisilihasten yli sääriluun sisäreunan kyhmyyn (tuberositas tibiae) leveän hanhenjalkakalvon (pes anserinus) välityksellä. Lihaksen nimen etymologiasta on neljä hypoteesia: Yksi on, että nimi valittiin koska räätälit istuivat ennen jalat ristikkäin; toinen on se, että lihaksen alapään sijainti osuu samaan kohtaan mistä räätälit mittaavat lahkeen sisäsauman pituutta; kolmas on että se muistuttaa räätälin mittanauhaa; neljänneksi, vanhoja poljettavia ompelukoneita käytettäessä niitä piti jatkuvasti polkea ja yhdistettynä jalkojen asentoon lihas kehittyi räätäleillä huomattavastikin.
    ellauri369.html on line 359: As a boy, Teufelsdröckh was left in a basket on the doorstep of a childless couple in the German country town of Entepfuhl ("Duck-Pond"); his father a retired sergeant of Frederick the Great and his mother a very pious woman, who to Teufelsdröckh´s gratitude, raises him in utmost spiritual discipline. In very flowery language, Teufelsdröckh recalls at length the values instilled in his idyllic childhood, the Editor noting most of his descriptions originating in intense spiritual pride. Teufelsdröckh eventually is recognized as being clever, and sent to Hinterschlag (slap-behind) Gymnasium. While there, Teufelsdröckh is intellectually stimulated, and befriended by a few of his teachers, but frequently bullied by other students. His reflections on this time of his life are ambivalent: glad for his education, but critical of that education´s disregard for actual human activity and character, as regarding both his own treatment and his education´s application to politics. While at University, Teufelsdröckh encounters the same problems, but eventually gains a small teaching post and some favour and recognition from the German nobility. While interacting with these social circles, Teufelsdröckh meets a woman he calls Blumine (Goddess of Flowers; the Editor assumes this to be a pseudonym), and abandons his teaching post to pursue her. She spurns his advances for a British aristocrat named Towgood. Teufelsdröckh is thrust into a spiritual crisis, and leaves the city to wander the European countryside, but even there encounters Blumine and Towgood on their honeymoon. He sinks into a deep depression, culminating in the celebrated Everlasting No, disdaining all human activity. Still trying to piece together the fragments, the Editor surmises that Teufelsdröckh either fights in a war during this period, or at least intensely uses its imagery, which leads him to a "Centre of Indifference", and on reflection of all the ancient villages and forces of history around him, ultimately comes upon the affirmation of all life in "The Everlasting Yea". The Editor, in relief, promises to return to Teufelsdröckh´s book, hoping with the of his assembled biography to glean some new insight into the philosophy. Wow, sounds a lot like Carlyle´s personal biography, lightly camouflaged?
    ellauri369.html on line 364: The Editor: The narrator of the novel, who in reviewing Teufelsdröckh´s book, reveals much about his own tastes, as well as deep sympathy towards Teufelsdröckh, and much worry as to social issues of his day. His tone varies between conversational, condemning and even semi-Biblical prophecy. The Reviewer should not be confused with Carlyle himself, seeing as much of Teufelsdröckh´s life implements Carlyle´s own biography. I told you so!
    ellauri369.html on line 366: Hofrath: Hofrath Heuschrecke (i. e. State-Councillor Grasshopper) is a loose, zigzag figure, a blind admirer of Teufelsdröckh´s, an incarnation of distraction distracted, and the only one who advises the editor and encourages him in his work; a victim to timidity and preyed on by an uncomfortable sense of mere physical cold, such as the majority of the state-counsellors of the day were. Sounds a lot like Waldo Emerson.
    ellauri369.html on line 368: Blumine: A woman associated to the German nobility with whom Teufelsdröckh falls in love early in his career. Her spurning of him to marry Towgood leads Teufelsdröckh to the spiritual crisis that culminates in the Everlasting No. Their relationship is somewhat parodic of Werther´s spurned love for Lotte in The Sorrows of Young Werther (including her name "Goddess of Flowers", which may simply be a pseudonym), though, as the Editor notes, Teufelsdröckh does not take as much incentive as does Werther. Critics have associated her with Kitty Kirkpatrick, with whom Carlyle himself fell in love before marrying Jane Carlyle.
    ellauri369.html on line 373: Towgood: The English aristocrat who ultimately marries Blumine, throwing Teufelsdröckh into a spiritual crisis. If Blumine is indeed a fictionalization of Kitty Kirkpatrick, Towgood would find his original in Captain James Winslowe Phillipps, who married Kirkpatrick in 1829.
    ellauri369.html on line 375: Sartor Resartus was intended to be a new kind of book: simultaneously factual and fictional, serious and satirical, speculative and historical. It ironically commented on its own formal structure, while forcing the reader to confront the problem of where "truth" is to be found. In this respect it develops techniques used much earlier in Tristram Shandy, to which it refers. The imaginary "Philosophy of Clothes" holds that meaning is to be derived from phenomena, continually shifting over time, as cultures reconstruct themselves in changing fashions, power-structures, and faith-systems. The book contains a very Fichtean conception of religious conversion: based not on the acceptance of God but on the absolute freedom of the will to reject evil, and to construct meaning. This has led some writers to see Sartor Resartus as an early existentialist text. Why of course!
    ellauri369.html on line 393: On Herpes, Hero-Worship, & the Heroic in History on skotlantilaisen esseistien, historioitsijan ja filosofin Thomas Carlylen kirja, jonka on julkaissut James Fraser , Lontoo, vuonna 1841. Se on kokoelma kuudesta toukokuussa 1840 pidetystä luennosta merkittävistä historiallisista aiheista. lukuja. Se ilmaisee Carlylen uskon sankarillisen johtajuuden tärkeyteen.
    ellauri369.html on line 423: Carlyle oli yksi harvoista filosofeista, jotka elivät läpi Britannian teollisen vallankumouksen, mutta säilyttivät ei-materialistisen näkemyksen historiallisesta kehityksestä. Mikä tampio!
    ellauri369.html on line 427: Carlyle katsoi, että "Suurten miesten tulisi hallita ja pikkumiespalvelijoiden tulee kunnioittaa heitä". Yhteiskunnat, kuten organismit, kehittyvät läpi historian, kukoistavat jonkin aikaa, mutta heikkenevät väistämättä ja kuolevat sukupuuttoon antaen paikan vahvemmalle, paremmalle rodulle. Sankarit ovat niitä, jotka vahvistavat tämän elämänprosessin hyväksyen sen julmuuden tarpeelliseksi ja siten hyväksi. Heille rohkeus on arvokkaampi hyve kuin rakkaus; sankarit ovat aatelisia, eivät pyhiä. Sankari toimii ensinnäkin mallina, jota muut voivat jäljitellä, ja toiseksi luojana, joka siirtää historiaa eteenpäin eikä taaksepäin (historia on suurten miesten elämäkerta). Carlyle oli aikansa ensimmäisten joukossa, jotka ymmärsivät, että Jumalan kuolema ei sinänsä ole iloinen asia, ellei ihminen astu kalifixi kalifin paikalle ja luo uusia arvoja vanhan tilalle. Carlylen mukaan sankarista tulisi tulla palvonnan kohde, uuden uskonnon keskus, joka julistaa ihmiskunnan "ihmeiden ihmeeksi... ainoaksi jumaluudeksi, jonka voimme tuntea". Hemmetin kusipää.
    ellauri369.html on line 435: Friedrich Nietzsche yhtyi suureen osaan Carlylen sankarin palvonnasta mutta vasta tilaisuuden jälkeen, ja siirsi sankarin monia ominaisuuksia käsitykseensä Übermenschistä.
    ellauri369.html on line 439: Friedrich Nietzsche yhtyi suureen osaan Carlylen sankarin palvonnasta ja siirsi sankarin monia ominaisuuksia hänen käsitykseensä Übermenschistä .
    ellauri369.html on line 495: Frouden historialliselle kirjoittamiselle oli ominaista sen dramaattisen epätieteellinen käsittely historiasta, lähestymistapa, jonka Froude jakoi Carlylen kanssa, ja myös Frouden aikomus puolustaa Englannin uskonpuhdistusta.
    ellauri369.html on line 497: Frouden sepustuxet herättivät sekä liberaalien että Oxford High Church määnien vihan; tämä vihamielisyys ilmaistiin Christian Remembrancerin ja Edinburgh Review - lehden arvosteluissa. Teos oli kuitenkin suosittu menestys, ja sen kanssa, että Froude kielsi varhaiset romaanit vuonna 1858, auttoi häntä saamaan takaisin suuren osan vuonna 1849 menettämänsä arvostuksen. Thomas Macaulayn kuoleman ansiosta vuonna 1859 Froudesta tuli tunnetuin elävä historioitsija Englannissa.
    ellauri369.html on line 500: Vuonna 1981 julkaistussa palkitussa teoksessa historioitsija JW Burrow huomautti Froudesta, että hän oli vuosisadan viimeisten vuosien imperialistisen jännityksen johtava edistäjä, mutta hänen työnsä massassa jopa imperiumi oli toisella sijalla uskonnolle.
    ellauri369.html on line 527: Kiista jatkui niin kauan, että vuonna 1903, lähes kymmenen vuotta Frouden kuoleman jälkeen, hänen tyttärensä päättivät julkaista My Relations with Carlyle -kirjan , jonka heidän isänsä oli kirjoittanut vuonna 1887. Tässä pamfletissa Froude yritti perustella päätöksiään elämäkerran kirjoittajana, mutta meni kuitenkin pitemmälle, juu, juu , meni pitemmälle, kuin hänen virallinen elämäkertansa oli, spekuloimalla Geraldine Jewsburyn levittämien "juorujen ja huhujen" perusteella, että Carlylen avioliitto jäi keskeneräisexi Tuomon impotenssin vuoksi. Tämän kiisti James Crichton-Browne , joka julkaisi "Froude and Carlyle: The Amputation Lääketieteellisesti" (1903) The British Medical Journalissa, mikä toi esiin Jewsburyn epäluotettavuuden, Janen sopimattomuuden synnyttää lapsia ja Carlylen kirjoitusten miehisyyden argumenttina Froudea vastaan. Crichton-Browne vahvisti myöhemmin, että yhden Janen sairauden jälkeen hänen henkilökohtainen lääkärinsä Richard Quain lähetti Carlylelle sanan, että tämä voisi "palata aviopuuhasteluun vaimonsa kanssa". Aileen Christianson , viitaten molempien Carlylejen kirjeenvaihtoon ja Janen komuutista löytyneisiin käytettyihin ranskalaisiin kirjeisiin, toteaa: "Näyttää todennäköiseltä, että heillä oli seksuaalinen suhde, riippumatta siitä, mitä myöhemmässä avioliitossa sairaus ja taipumukset rajoittivat, ja että myöhemmät kiistat Thomasin "impotenssista" tai Janen frigiditeetistä liittyivät enemmän avioliiton kummankin puolen puolustajien näkemykseen kuin totuuteen."
    ellauri369.html on line 529: Carlylen elämän päätyttyä Froude suuntasi matkustamaan, erityisesti Britannian siirtomaihin, vieraillen Etelä-Afrikassa, Australiassa, Uudessa-Seelannissa, Yhdysvalloissa ja Länsi-Intiassa. Froude aikoi "sytyttää kansalaisten mielissä kotona sitä mielikuvituksellista innostusta siirtomaa-ajatusta kohtaan, josta hänen oma sydämensä oli täynnä". Tänä aikana Froude kirjoitti myös historiallisen romaanin, The Two Chiefs of Dumbbell, joka oli vähiten suosittu hänen kypsistä teoksistaan. Kuten aiemmassa kirjassaan Irlannin historiasta, Froude käytti kirjaa muuttaakseen irlantilaisesta sankarista konnan, jolla on historiallisia vääristymiä.
    ellauri369.html on line 531: Kun vastustajansa Edward Augustus Freeman kuoli vuonna 1892, Froude nimitettiin lordi Salisburyn suosituksesta hänen seuraajakseen modernin historian Regius-professoriksi Oxfordissa. Lordi Salisbury oli brittiläinen konservatiivinen poliitikko, joka toimi pääministerinä kolme kertaa yhteensä yli 13 vuoden ajan. Hän vältti liittoutumia pitäen yllä upeaa eristäytymistä. Valinta oli kiistanalainen, sillä Frouden edeltäjät olivat olleet hänen ankarimpia arvostelijoitaan, ja hänen teoksiaan pidettiin yleensä kirjallisina teoksina akateemiseen maailmaan soveltuvien vakavan historian kirjojen sijaan. Siitä huolimatta hänen luennot olivat erittäin suosittuja, suurelta osin Frouden kokemuksen syvyyden ja monipuolisuuden vuoksi ja pian hänestä tuli Orielin stipendiaatti. Froude luennoi pääasiassa Englannin uskonpuhdistuksesta , "English Sea-Men in the Sixteenth Century (Sir Francis Drake ja Thomas Cauendish) ja Erasmuksesta.
    ellauri370.html on line 36: Sitä ei turhaan kutsuta ikuiseksi juutalaiseksi, tunnettu kirjailija POUL BORCHSENIUS kirjoittaa tässä kirjassaan juutalaisesta kansasta kautta aikojen ja sen useiden tuhansien vuosien vaikeuksista vihan ja vainon alla. Heidän historiassaan ja olemassaolossaan kätkeytyy salaisuus, arvoitus, jota kukaan ei näytä pystyvän ratkaisemaan. Miten tämä kansa voi vielä olla olemassa kovasta yrityxestä huolimatta? Mikä sitä pitää yllä?
    ellauri370.html on line 49: Esther's maiden name was Hadassah, meaning Myrtle. Although the details of the setting are entirely plausible and the story may even have some basis in actual events, there is general agreement among scholars that the book of Esther is a work of fiction. Persian kings did not marry outside of seven Persian noble families, making it unlikely that there was a Jewish queen Esther. Further, the name Ahasuerus can be translated to Xerxes, as both derive from the Persian Khshayārsha. Ahasuerus as described in the Book of Esther is usually identified in modern sources to refer to Xerxes I, who ruled between 486 and 465 BCE, as it is to this monarch that the events described in Esther are thought to fit the most closely. Xerxes I's queen was Amestris, further highlighting the fictitious nature of the story.
    ellauri370.html on line 51: Some scholars speculate that the story was created to justify the Jewish appropriation of an originally non-Jewish feast. The festival which the book explains is Purim, which is explained as meaning "lot", from the Babylonian word puru. One popular theory says the festival has its origins in a historicized Babylonian myth or ritual in which Mordecai and Esther represent the Babylonian gods Marduk and Ishtar, while others trace the ritual to the Persian New Year, and scholars have surveyed other theories in their works. Some scholars have defended the story as real history, but the attempt to find a historical kernel to the narrative "is likely to be futile".
    ellauri370.html on line 53: Esther and Mordechai were definitely cousins. There was a big age gap between them, seeing as Mordechai took Esther in after she was orphaned. But according to TheTorah.com, some translations suggest he took her in as his wife, not as his ward. The exact phrase is he "took her to him," which one rabbi in Ask The Rabbi notes is only used when referring to marriage. Then why would Esther have passed for virginal woman if she'd been the wife of someone else? It may have been a matter of her age. It's gross, but it's true. This means it's very possible Mordechai never slept with Esther, well, not often anyway. According to the Jewish Women's Archive, Esther's considered not to have committed adultery because she didn't have a choice in marrying King Xerxes.
    ellauri370.html on line 57: While travelling together, Haman ran out of food and had to beg Mordechai for some of his. Mordechai said the biblical equivalent of, "Sure, but you have to be my slave." Haman accepted and was trolled by Mordechai for God knows how long. Way to go Mordechai! They owe us SOOOOOO much!
    ellauri370.html on line 61: When Haman is begging Queen Esther for his life after he tried to do the Jews dirty, he falls onto the couch she's lying on. The king walks in, thinks Haman is trying to have a go on his hot wife, and promptly has Haman impaled on a pole fifty cubits high (about 75 feet). Read More: How to clean a toilet ring.
    ellauri370.html on line 68: B) Between 1880 and 1920, the majority of the Russian Jews (about 3 million) immigrated to the USA. This was mostly a response to the Czarist pogroms which killed about, say, 10,000 Russian Jews. Most American Jews are the descendants of these Russian Jewish immigrants.
    ellauri370.html on line 72: D) Right after WWI, the Ukrainian nationalists killed 100,000 Jews in terrible massacres. This is a forgotten tragedy. Another wave of desperate Russian Jews then immigrated to USA, till the Communists sealed the Soviet borders in 1922.
    ellauri370.html on line 102: Amalie Gresseth (16) skriver i Aftenposten (einn Schibsted-avis): Er seksualundervisningen i norsk skole god nok? Nei. Vi må lære om kjønnsidentitet og seksualitet, om skeiv sex og at sex ikke kun er penis i vagina eller en blowjob. Det er også penis och tunge i arsle. Jeg har hørt historier om folk som aldri har hatt seksualitetsundervisning. André har bare fått det i form av kondom på dildo og nettbasert undervisning. Er det mangel på laererkompetanse, eller er det for tabubelagt og «flaut»? Karl-Ove Knausgaard var nokk en bra sekslaerer til 13-åringer. (Dette er et ;D-innlegg. Meninger i teksten står for skribentens regning. Innlegg kan sendes inn her.)
    ellauri370.html on line 104: Jackson sponsored the Jackson–Vanik amendment in the Senate (with Charles Vanik sponsoring it in the House), which denied normal trade relations to certain countries with non-market economies that restricted the freedom of emigration. The amendment was intended to help refugees, particularly minorities, specifically Jews, to emigrate from the Soviet Bloc. Jackson and his assistant, Richard Perle, also lobbied personally for some people who were affected by this law such as Anatoly (now Natan) Sharansky.
    ellauri370.html on line 108: Jackson was known as a hawkish Democrat. He was often criticized for his support for the Vietnam War and his close ties to the defense industries of his state. His proposal of Fort Lawton as a site for an anti-ballistic missile system was strongly opposed by local residents, and Jackson was forced to modify his position on the location of the site several times, but continued to support ABM development. American Indian rights activists who protested Jackson's plan to give Fort Lawton to Seattle, instead of returning it to local tribes, staged a sit-in. In the eventual compromise, most of Fort Lawton became Discovery Park, with 20 acres (8.1 ha) leased to United Indians of All Tribes, who opened the Daybreak Star Cultural Center there in 1977.
    ellauri370.html on line 110: Opponents derided him as "the senator from Boeing", as well as a "whore for Boeing", because of his consistent support for additional military spending on weapons systems and accusations of wrongful contributions from the company; in 1965, 80% of Boeing's contracts were military.
    ellauri370.html on line 112: In addition, contrary to claims that he was an environmentalist, Jackson was almost as much a "whore for logging companies" as for Boeing, according Carsten Lien's book Olympic Battleground. After his death, critics pointed to Jackson's support for Japanese American internment camps during World War II as a reason to protest the placement of his bust at the University of Washington.[25] Jackson was both an enthusiastic defender of the evacuation and a staunch proponent of the campaign to keep the Japanese-Americans from returning to the Pacific Coast after the war. Jackson died at 71. Jackson's death was greatly mourned. Jackson was proof of the old belief in the Judaic tradition that at any moment in history goodness in the world (olam) is preserved (tikkum) by the deeds of 36 just men who do not know that this is the role the Lord has given them. Scoop Jackson was one of those men.
    ellauri370.html on line 114: Scoopin värinen Skipin rotuveli Michael Jackson called his Jewish business associates leeches. He was best man to Mr. Uri Geller. He bought toys in Jerusalem when the mall was closed. He dressed up as an Israeli officer.
    ellauri370.html on line 116: Suorapuheinen New Jerseyn rabbi (ja kongressiedustaja wannabe) tapasi Michael Jacksonin vuonna 1999 Jacksonin ystävän, israelilaisen illusionisti Uri Gellerin avulla, ja heistä tuli ystäviä. Jackson tuli jopa Boteachin taloon Shabbat-illallisille. Rabbi on julkisesti seisonut Jacksonia vastaan ​​- puolustaen häntä syytöksiä natsien myötämielisyydestä tai jatkanut työskentelyä hänen kanssaan lapsiasioissa huolimatta syytöksistä seksuaalisesta hyväksikäytöstä. Mitä Michael teki hississä? Painoi nappulaa.
    ellauri370.html on line 125: Liz converted to Judaism after the death of his 3. huzband Mike Todd. The Iron Curtain had lifted a bit but then it closed again.
    ellauri370.html on line 135: Has Ukraine's army built substantial defensive positions in front of Russia fortified lines? What are some of the most interesting unknown events/facts (mysteries) of history? Why do Finnish people seem to resist the Swedish language, but are happy to learn and speak English? Why is China’s communism so different than Russia´s? What is the most fascinating historical photo? How do I access a phone with a broken touch screen through a computer? Who is the mother of the President of Ukraine? Why did she fail to teach him Ukrainian? Did she teach her Hebrew or Jiddish? Doesn’t Putin realize he will be VAPORIZED 15 to 20 minutes after he launches his first missile? Why don't elite soldiers and Navy SEALs have physiques like Dwayne Johnson or Vin Diesel? Do you trust Ukraine to use the M1 Abrams tanks responsibly? Why not?
    ellauri370.html on line 154: Poul Borchsenius (7. heinäkuuta 1897 Odense, Tanska − 6. maaliskuuta 1983 Randers, Tanska) oli tanskalainen pappi ja kirjailija. Hän opiskeli ensin historiaa mutta siirtyi sitten opiskelemaan teologiaa ja suoritti virkatutkinnon 1921. Hänen opiskeluaikansa oli liberaalin teologian aikaa, mikä jätti leimansa häneen. Näkemystensä vuoksi hän joutui erimielisyyksiin kirkon johdon kanssa Kööpenhaminassa ja siirtyi Randersiin.
    ellauri370.html on line 156: Borchsenius oli toisen maailmansodan aikana mukana evakuoimassa Tanskan juutalaisia Ruotsiin. Hän sai siksi briteiltä kehotuksen lähteä maasta ja oli Ruotsissa 1943−1945. Hän toimi Ruotsissa Tanskan prikaatin sotilaspastorina ja työskenteli yhteistyössä brittien tiedustelupalvelun kanssa. Sodan jälkeen hän kirjoitti juutalaisten historiasta useita kirjoja, joista kaksi on suomennettu. Ei kuitenkaan tätä. Eikä elämäkertaa Makeaa viiniä ja sappea. Molempia oli riittänyt.
    ellauri370.html on line 190: Uttrycket "De tre ringarna" syftar på de tre monoteistiska religionerna judendom, kristendom och islam. Dessa tre religioner samexisterade under stor frihet under de moriska härskarna. Enligt en legend frågade Saladin juden Natan den vise om vilken av de tre religionerna som var sann. Natan förstod att hur han än svarade skulle svaret vändas emot honom. Därför berättade han en historia om en ring som gått i arv från far till den mest älskade av sina söner i många släktled. Efter många släktled kom ringen till en man som älskade alla sina söner lika mycket och han lovade var och en av dem ringen. På dödsbädden kallade han till sig en guldsmed som tillverkade två exakta kopior av ringen. Innan han dog gav han en ring till var och en. And one ring to rule them all. Rex regi rebellis. Kylmä rinki persiessä. Mikä näistä on paras kysyy lapset. Kaikissa on puolesa vastaa iskä. Ärrsyttävää!
    ellauri370.html on line 209: Aragorn kruunattiin Mordorin häviön jälkeen kuninkaaksi ja hän päätti, että Núrnin orjat vapautettaisiin ja luovutti heille kaikki maat Núrnin sisämeren lähistöllä. Gorgorothista tuli taas karu autiomaa, eikä siellä asunut enää örkkejä ja muita pahuuden voimia palvelevia olentoja. Sauron ja sormusaaveet olivat tuhoutuneet ja Mordor joutui jälleen Gondorin vallan alaisuuteen.
    ellauri370.html on line 223: Juutalaisten karkottaminen oli vakiintunut trendi myös Euroopan historiassa. 1200-1500-luvulla ainakin 15 Euroopan maata karkotti juutalaisen väestönsä. Juutalaisten karkottamista Espanjasta edelsi karkotukset muun muassa Englannista, Ranskasta ja Saksasta, ja niitä seurasi ainakin viisi muuta karkotusta. Kulta ja hopea piti jättää, lumput sai viedä mukana. Ympärileikkaus ja ruokarituaalit ällöttivät kaikkia, kuin myös hassut hatut, pöyhkeys ja eriseuraisuus. Mikä vika sianlihassa? Mixei lihan kanssa maitoa? Mixi julma elävältä teurastus? Ravut ovat hyviä. Sirkat eivät.
    ellauri370.html on line 284: And his mama cries
    ellauri370.html on line 299: And his hunger burns
    ellauri370.html on line 308: And his mama cries
    ellauri370.html on line 310: Face down on the street with a gun in his hand
    ellauri370.html on line 316: And his mama cries
    ellauri370.html on line 319: A lot of Elvis Presley songs were written especially for him, but according to Mac Davis, Presley´s 1969 hit, In the Ghetto, was not such a song. Mac Davis commented, 'I never really dreamed of pitching that song to Elvis. I had been working on In the Ghetto for several years. I grew up playing with a little boy in Lubbock, Texas, whose family lived in a dirt street ghetto. His dad and my dad worked in construction together. So that little boy and I sort of grew up together. I never understood why his family had to live where they lived while my family lived where we lived. Of course back in those days, the word "ghetto" hadn't come along yet. (It is Venetian for "foundry".) But I always wanted to write a song about that situation and title it 'The Vicious Circle'. I thought that if you were born in that place and that situation, then you grow up there and one day you die there, and another kid is born there that kind of replaces you. And later I started thinking about the ghetto as a title for the song.
    ellauri370.html on line 326: Useimmat historioitsijat ovat yhtä mieltä siitä, että Kolumbus syntyi Genovan tasavallassa tai nykyajan Italiassa, mutta Kolumbus puhui espanjaa sujuvasti, mikä ehkä viittaa siihen, että Kolumbuksen perhe oli alun perin Espanjasta.
    ellauri370.html on line 330: Kolumbukselle osoitetuissa kirjeissä ja päiväkirjoissa on viittauksia juutalaisiin pyhiin kirjoituksiin ja päivämääriin juutalaisesta kalenterista, ja on huomattava, että Kolumbus valitsi miehistöönsä monia juutalaisia ja konversoja. Matkan rahoituxen järkännyt Santangel oli konverso. Kolumbuksen matkaa ei rahoittanut, kuten yleisesti uskotaan, kuningatar Isabellan syvät taskut, vaan kaksi juutalaista conversoa ja kolmantena huomattava juutalainen. Louis de Santangel ja Gabriel Sanchez lainasivat 17 000 dukaatin korotonta lainaa omasta taskustaan auttaakseen matkan maksamisessa, samoin kuin Don Isaac Abarbanel, rabbi ja juutalainen valtiomies. Juutalaisten tiedemiesten ja rahoittajien hänelle antama apu voidaan selittää vain sillä että hän oli samaa rotua.
    ellauri370.html on line 334: Tiša be'av (hepr. ‏תִּשְׁעָה בְּאָב‎) on juutalainen juhlapäivä, jota vietetään juutalaisessa kalenterissa heinä- tai elokuulle osuvan av-kuukauden yhdeksäntenä päivänä. Se on juutalaisen vuoden surullisin päivä. Tälle päivämäärälle osuvat eräät juutalaisen historian suurimmista onnettomuuksista:
    ellauri370.html on line 370: In public, President Biden likes to whisper to make a point. In private, he´s prone to yelling. Biden began to shout and swear over polls dropping amid Israel-Hamas conflict. He shouldn´t have warned Israelis to avoid 9/11 mistakes. What mistakes? There will a bloodbath if Trump loses yet another vote.
    ellauri370.html on line 398: Spengler and Sombart could not agree more. Duhring´s political economy has much in common with that of Mahatma Gandhi, the Indian leader, who attacked exploitation in any form, capitalist or Marxist, and advocated a society based on the principles of moral conscience, economic self-sufficiency, and mutual cooperation. He also drank his own pee and slept naked sandwiched between teenage girls. Diihring considered all property related to personal accomplishment as vigorously to be defended against the acquisitive grasp of Socialistic measures. All Marxist denials of social classifications are thus Utopian since a conflict of interests is indivisibly linked to the natural differences between man and mouse.
    ellauri370.html on line 404: 1881 erschien Dührings Kampfschrift Die Judenfrage als Racen-, Sitten- und Culturfrage. Mit einer weltgeschichtlichen Antwort. Sie war ein pseudowissenschaftlicher Versuch, dem Antisemitismus als politischer Bewegung ein biologisches, historisches und philosophisches Fundament zu geben.
    ellauri370.html on line 457: Arthur, Comte de Gobineau, was born in France in 1816. His essay ´On the Inequality of Human Races´ was published in 1853. Wagner admitted in his own autobiography ´Mein Leben´ (My Life), that his compositions came to him from some outside source, when he was in a state of trance. Ach! Mein Leben! There is some documentary evidence to support the contention that the mad swan king Ludwig of Bayern maintained a homosexual relationship with Wagner. He is now best known for Disney´s magic Castle at Neuschwanstein with Heli-keiju buzzin round it like a fly circling a turd.
    ellauri370.html on line 466: Chamberlain oli aina taipuvainen sankareiden palvontaan, ja hänelle Hindenburg ja Ludendorff olivat pitkäkalloisimmat pitkästä saksalaisten sankarien joukosta. Marraskuussa 1918 Chamberlain järkyttyi täysin ja kauhistui Saksan tappiosta sodassa, tappiosta, jonka hän piti mahdottomaksi, sekä marraskuun vallankumouksesta, joka oli kukistanut hänen rakkaan monarkiansa. Lisää katkeruuttaan Chamberlain oli nyt niin halvaantunut, ettei hän voinut enää poistua sängystään, minkä hän uskoi olevan seurausta Britannian salaisen palvelun myrkytyksestä.
    ellauri370.html on line 470: Aatu piti paizi Dr. Kildaresta myös erityisesti suositusta yleishyödyllisestä Theodor Fritschistä, jonka yksi painopiste oli väitetty juutalaisten naisten seksuaalinen hyväksikäyttö.
    ellauri370.html on line 478: In 1923 Chamberlain met "most respected and dear" Adolf Hitler in Wagner festival at Bayreuth, and in September he sat in his wheelchair next to Hitler during the völkisch "German Day" paraolympic parade. Hitler rejoiced "like a child" at the news, skipping the same way as with Mannerheim.
    ellauri370.html on line 483: January 1927, Hitler, along with several highly ranked members of the Nazi Party, attended Chamberlain´s funeral. In 1909, some months before his 17th birthday, Rosenberg went with an aunt to visit his guardian where several other relatives were gathered. Bored, he went to a book shelf, picked up a copy of Chamberlain´s The Foundations and wrote of the moment: "I felt electrified; I wrote down the title and went straight to the bookshop." In 1930 Rosenberg published The Myth of the Twentieth Century, a homage to and continuation of Chamberlain´s work. Hitler told the ailing Chamberlain that he´d write a sequel to it. The French Germanic scholar Edmond Vermeil considered Chamberlain´s ideas "essentially shoddy".
    ellauri370.html on line 508: Hän ei ollut perehtynyt sen enempää teologiaan kuin aikansa luonnon­tieteeseenkään, mutta kun hän kirjoitti ennen kuin evoluutioteoria tuli yleisesti tunnetuiksi, hän piti Raamattua ­todenmukaisena kertomuksena ihmiskunnan muinaishistoriasta.
    ellauri370.html on line 605: Yhdessä toisen völkisch -johtajan, historioitsija Heinrich von Treitschken kanssa, Stoecker käynnisti antisemitistisen vetoomuksen vuonna 1880, jonka neljännesmiljoona saksalaista allekirjoitti ja pyysi juutalaisten maahanmuuton kieltämistä Saksaan, juutalaisten äänestämisen ja julkisen viran kieltämistä sekä juutalaisia. kielletään toimimasta opettajana tai yliopistoon.
    ellauri370.html on line 628: oli varsinainen juutalaisten vainolainen. Keskiajalla katolinen kirkko sisällytti kanoniseen lakiinsa lakeja, jotka rajoittivat ankarasti juutalaisten elämää ja ammatteja. Paavi Martinus V kumosi osan näistä rajoituksista ja antoi vuonna 1421 juutalaisten lääkäreiden hoitaa kristittyjä potilaita Espanjassa; Vuonna 1422 annettiin paavin asetus juutalaisvastaisia saarnaajia vastaan. Paavi kuitenkin kumosi molemmat säädökset vuoden 1423 alussa. Paavin takinkäännöstä ei ole vielä selvitetty historiallisesti - Jussin elämäkerturin Hoferin mukaan se voidaan jäljittää Kapistraanin vaikutukseen, erityisesti siksi, että häntä kuultiin paavin kuurialta juutalaiskysymyksessä ja erityisesti Espanjan osalta. Kapistraano esitti toistuvasti esityksiä maallisille hallitsijoille varmistaakseen, että rajoittavia ja syrjiviä juutalaisia lakeja sovellettiin täysimääräisesti, esim. pukeutumiskoodi ja velvollisuus käyttää juutalaista pukua. Kun paavi Martinus V varoitti Napolin kuningatar Johanna II:ta vuonna 1427 lieventämästä ankaruuttaan juutalaisia kohtaan, hän selitti, että tiukka käsky oli annettu Kapistraanon pyynnöstä. Vuonna 1447 paavi Nikolai V julkaisi bullan, joka Hoferin mukaan perustui todennäköisesti Kapistraanon ehdotukseen ja jossa vaadittiin juutalaisten lakien tiukkaa soveltamista tai tiukennettiin näitä lakeja. Juutalaisten sulkeminen pois kaikista kontakteista kristittyjen kanssa tulisi toteuttaa sen rajoissa, mikä on mahdollista. Kapistraano, jota kutsuttiin myös "heprealaisten vitsaukseksi", itse sai tehtäväkseen viedä bullaa juutalaisille. Hänen sanotaan jopa tarjonneen paaville lastata kaikki Italian juutalaiset laivoille ja pudottaa heidät kaukaiseen maahan, esim Jordanille. Kirjaimellisesti toteutettuna bulla olisi ollut katastrofi Italian juutalaisille, mutta myöhempien lievennysten vuoksi sitä ei toteutettu täysimääräisesti. Kultavasara kai pehmitti kivisydämet.
    ellauri370.html on line 630: Vuonna 1453 Breslaussa tapahtui pienehkö pogrom. Langewiesestä Oelsin läheltä kotoisin oleva maanviljelijä oli syyttänyt juutalaisia isännän häpäisemisestä. Juutalaiset vanhimmat olivat ottaneet haltuunsa velkaisia isäntiä ja ruoskivat niitä kepeillä ja näin häväisivät heidät. Kuningas valtuutti Capistranon tutkimaan. Tämän seurauksena 2. toukokuuta 1453 kaikki 318 juutalaista Breslaussa ja lähiseudulla vangittiin Breslauhun ja tunnustukset hankittiin kidutuksen avulla. Capistrano poltti 41 juutalaista roviolla ja loput karkotettiin kaupungista, mutta lapset täytyi jättää taakse ja kastaa väkisin. Taskin tuttu tematiikka Al Holin leiriltä. Juutalaisten omaisuus takavarikoitiin, mikä Cohnin mukaan oli pogromin todellinen motiivi. Niin aina. Pelkästään arkistosta Cohn löysi yksitoista kirjasta velkakirjeitä, jotka olivat kuuluneet juutalaisille. Siellä oli myös suuria varastoja muista juutalaisten omistamista tavaroista. Vuonna 1455 Breslaun kaupunki sai kuningas Ladislaus Postumukselta peruskirjan Privilegium de non tolerandis Judaeis ("etuoikeus olla suvaitsematta juutalaisia"), joka oli voimassa de jure vuoteen 1744 saakka.
    ellauri370.html on line 647: Toynbeen mielestä roduille käy huonosti jos ne eivät suostu vetämään historian vaunuja. Kalpaten kävi eskimoille ja hottentoteille, muttei briteille. Toynbeen mielestä juutalaisetkin on fossiileita, kun ne eivät sulaudu Britannian kansanyhteisöön. wait and see sanoo juutalaiset, kuka tässä sulautuu vielä kehen.
    ellauri370.html on line 673: Der Orden ist völlig unpolitisch und hat mit der Freimaurerei nichts weiter gemeinsam als gleichartige, aber auf einen konfessionell engen Kreis beschränkte Tendenzen der ethischen Erziehung seiner Mitglieder und der Karitas. Die Gegnerschaft, die der Orden auch in Freimaurerkreisen findet, ist ganz unbegründet.
    ellauri370.html on line 681: Im österreichischen Teil Österreich-Ungarns wurde 1889 die Loge Austria gegründet, die Israelitischer Humanitätsverein genannt werden musste, da Logen (Freimaurerlogen) verboten waren. Es folgten ab 1892 Logengründungen in Pilsen, Krakau, Prag (zwei Logen), Karlsbad, Reichenberg, Brünn, Troppau, Lemberg, Budweis und Czernowitz. 1895 wurde die Loge Wien gegründet, deren Präsident jahrelang der Philosoph Wilhelm Jerusalem war. Sigmund Freud war Mitglied der Loge Wien.
    ellauri370.html on line 690: Aktiivisempi juutalaisia syrjivä politiikka alkoi Puolan jakamisesta 1700-luvulla Itävallan, Preussin (Saksan) ja Venäjän toimesta, mikä johti ensimmäistä kertaa Venäjän historiassa suureen juutalaisten asukkaan maan hallintaan Venäjän jaossa. Tämä maa nimettiin Pale of Settlementiksi, josta juutalaisia kiellettiin muuttamasta Venäjän sisäpuolelle. Vuonna 1772 Katariina II pakotti Pale of Settlementin juutalaiset jäämään shtetleihinsä ja kielsi heitä palaamasta kaupunkeihin, jotka he miehittivät ennen Puolan jakamista. Pale of Settlement virallistettiin vuonna 1791 tarkoituksena vapauttaa Moskova juutalaisista. Sen rajat saatiin päätökseen vuonna 1812, kun Bessarabia liitettiin.
    ellauri370.html on line 731: Hmelnytskyn roolia Puolan valtion historiassa on nähty enimmäkseen negatiivisessa valossa. Vuoden 1648 kapina osoittautui Puolan kansainyhteisön kultakauden lopuksi ja sen lopun aluksi. Vaikka se selviytyi kapinasta ja sitä seuranneesta sodasta, Puola jaettiin sadassa vuodessa Venäjän, Preussin ja Itävallan kesken. Monet puolalaiset syyttivät Hmelnytskia tästäkin.
    ellauri371.html on line 109: Centralistimme laativat sen, mitä tarvitaan maailman hallitsemiseen. Kouvolasta päiviä, poliittisista suunnitelmistamme, kokemuksistamme historiaa kunkin virran tarkkailusta menten. Goimia ei ohjaa puolueettomuuden käytäntö eikä uudet historialliset havainnot ja teoreettiset rutinat, ilman kriittistä suhtautumista tuloksiin, tatam. Siksi meillä ei ole mitään varaa heidän kanssaan pelleillä. He pitävät hauskaa omaan aikaansa tai elävät toivossa uutta viihdettä tai kokemusmuistoja varten. Olkoon heille tärkein rooli me inspiroituneet hyväksymään tieteen (eli teorian) sanelut. Tätä tarkoitusta varten innostamme jatkuvasti, lehdistömme kautta annamme heille sokean luottamuksen. Goyimien intellektuellit voi kerskua tiedosta ja ilman loogista provärkkiä, toteuttaa kaiken, mistä on vedetty tietotiede, agenttiemme yhdistämä, tavoitteena kouluttaa mielemme meille oikealla tavalla - muokattu ii.
    ellauri371.html on line 270: Vapaamuurariuden johtajat. Ihmiset alistuvat tähän. Painan nappulaa hississä kuin Michael Jackson, koska tiedän sen: näiltä johtajilta oja riippuu tuloista, monisteista ja vastaanottamisesta kaikenlaisia ​​etuja.
    ellauri371.html on line 318: Vasta tällä hetkellä voimme kommunikoiden paljastaa kaikki päätöksemme, sillä jokaisen huomautuksen jälkeen uusi muutos on vaarallinen ja tässä syy: jos se on muutos toteutetaan vakavasti ja vakavuuden ja rajoituksen mielessä, niin se voi ajaa epätoivoon uusien muutosten pelosta - ei samaan suuntaan, johon se on valmistettu lisärentouttamisen mielessä, sano. On pelottavaa sanoa, että ymmärsimme olleemme väärässä, ja tämä heikentää uuden hallituksen erehtymättömyyden auraa, tai he sanovat, että he olivat peloissaan ja pakotettiin tekemään myönnytyksiä, minkä vuoksi kukaan ei ole kiitollinen, sillä hän harkitsee, niiden määrä... Molemmat ovat haitallisia arvostukselle, sanoo uusi perustuslaki. Tarvitsemme jyviä ensimmäisestä kuukaudesta lähtien sen julistushetkellä, jolloin kanat hämmästyvät kauhistuen. Tapahtunut vallankaappaus vaikuttaa edelleen elääkseen kauhussa ja hämmennyksessä, he ymmärsivät, että me niin vahva ja haavoittumaton, niin täynnä voimaa, että me emme ota niitä huomioon missään olosuhteissa emmekä ota --- älä vain kiinnitä huomiota heidän mielipiteisiinsä ja haluihinsa,
    ellauri371.html on line 384: Tuleva orjuus. Siis joka kerta jolloin julkaisemme artikkeleita missä vertaamme hyvää hallitustamme menneen rauhan siunattuihin siunauxiin, vaikka väliin tuli pakotettuja vuosisatoja jännitystä, toimii uutena helpotuksena mainitulle hyvälle. Goyim-hallinnon virheet kuvataan meillä kirkkaimmissa väreissä. Vierailemme heidän luonaan herättäen niin paljon inhoa, että ihmiset haluaisivat rauhaa vaikka orjavaltiossa pahamaineisten ihmisoikeuxien tilalle. Kyllä, porukka joka kiusasi heitä niin paljon, uupui eniten ihmisen olemassaolon lähteillä, jossa käyttivätten hyväksi toisten naaraita. Joukko roistoja hyökkäsi sen tietämättä luovarit ojossa... Hyödyttomiä hallituksen muutoksia, joihin me yllytimme goimia, kun heikensimme heitä varten valtion rakennukset, ne väsyvät siihen mennessä nämä ihmiset. Mitä he halusivat sietää meiltä kaikkea, oma syy, ei ole riskiä kokea samoja kokemuksia uudelleen, levottomuutta ja vastoinkäymisiä. Korostamme erityisesti iloa osoittaa goyim-hallittavien historialliset virheet, joten vuosisatojen ajan, jotka ovat piinaneet ihmiskuntaa älykkyyden poissaololla kaikessa, mikä koskee hänen totuuttaan, hyötyjä huomaamatta, tyydytystä näyttää näiden hankkeiden vain pahentaneen tilannetta; eikä parantanut yleisten suhteiden tilaa, johon ihmisen elämä perustuu, eli E!F!K!.
    ellauri371.html on line 454: Klassismin korvaaminen. Klassismi, kuten kaikki muu kuin Toora johtaa opiskelemaan muinaista historiaa, jossa on enemmän huonoja kuin hyviä esimerkkejä, korvaamme sen ohjelman ilman tulevaisuutta. Poistamme kaikki tosiasiat ihmisten muistista niiltä edellisiltä vuosisadoilta, joita emme halua muistella, jättäen vain ne, jotka ääriviivaavat kaikki goyim-hallinnon virheet. Käytännön oppi kansalaiselämästä, pakollisesta järjestelmästä, asenteesta ihmiset toisilleen, huonojen egojen välttämisestä konstikkaisia ​​esimerkkejä, jotka kylvävät pahan tartunnan ja muita vastaavia koulutusluonteisia kysymyksiä, tulee olemaan opetushuoneen ensimmäisissä tiloissa. Ohjelma laaditaan erillisen suunnitelman mukaan kaiken tiedon pänttäyxeen, yleistämättä millään tavalla opetusta. Tämä kysymyksen muotoilu on erityisen tärkeä.
    ellauri371.html on line 495: Havainto salaliittolaisten keskuudessa. Avoin haava on vallan kuolema. Koska suurin osa salaliitosta - Tschishchikov toimi rakkaudesta taiteeseen ja puhuu sen vuoksi paskoja, älä usko sitä - ennen kuin heidän puoleltaan toimimme, me emme häiritse heitä, vaan vain esittelemme heidät heidän keskelleen. Tarkkaile elementtejä. Meidän on muistettava tämä arvovalta: valta heikkenee, jos se löytää usein salaliittoja itseäsi vastaan. Tämä on voimattomuuden tunnustamista, tai mikä pahempaa, olla väärässä. Tiedät, että me tuhosimme hallitsevien goimien arvovallan toistuvilla ostoilla, teimme päätöksiä heidän elämästään agenttiemme kautta kuulematta laumamme pässiä, jonka useat olivat helposti joillain liberaaleilla lauseilla saaneet inspiroimaan rikoksia, niin kauan kuin niillä on poliittista sävyä. Otamme pois vain yhden asian: antakaa hallitsijoiden myöntää voimattomuutensa ilmoituksessa avata turvatoimia ja tuhota siten viranomaisten arvovallan.
    ellauri371.html on line 511: Poliittisten rikosten mainonta. Yritimme parhaamme ja toivottavasti saavutimme sen, mitä kaikki goyit eivät ymmärtäneetm nim. tämä tapa taistella kapinaa vastaan. Tehdäksesi tämän läpi lehdistössä ja puheissa - epäsuorasti taitavasti sommiteltuina historiankirjoissa mainostimme marttyyrikuolemaa. Kapinaajat ovat väitetysti ottaneet itselleen ajatuksen yhteisestä edusta. Tämä mainos lisäsi liberaalien joukkoa ja asetimme tuhansia goimia elävien joukkoomme [Ace Ventura].
    ellauri371.html on line 676: Jämäkkäleukainen Tom Jefferson (33) on edelleen yksi Yhdysvaltain historian merkkihenkilöistä, sillä hänet on ikuistettu Yhdysvaltain kahden dollarin seteliin, viiden sentin kolikkoon ja Mount Rushmore -vuoreen.
    ellauri372.html on line 44: Parthia (persiaksi اشکانیان, Aškāniān) oli historiallinen valtio nykyisen Iranin alueella. Parthialaiset olivat paimentolaiskansa, joka muutti Persiaan (Iran) noin vuonna 1000 eaa. He elivät persialaisten ja seleukidien vallan alla 300-luvulle eaa. saakka. Tuolloin seleukidien parthialainen vasalli perusti itsenäisen valtion, joka säilyi melkein 500 vuotta.
    ellauri372.html on line 58: Filthy rich Crassus himself was killed when truce negotiations turned violent. Crassus rose to political prominence following his victory over the slave revolt led by Spartacus. Crass. Within four years of Crassus' death, Caesar crossed the Rubicon to become another putinist, began a civil war against Pompey's optimists.
    ellauri372.html on line 74: Crassusten menetettyä omaisuutensa Sullan proskriptioissa Crassus ryhtyi nuorexi Roope Ankaxi. Sulla's proscriptions, in which the property of his victims was cheaply auctioned off, found one of the greatest acquirers of this type of property in Crassus: indeed, Sulla was especially supportive of this, because he wished to spread the blame as much as possible among those unscrupulous enough to do so.
    ellauri372.html on line 76: Crassus is said to have made part of his money from proscriptions, notably the proscription of one man whose name was not initially on the list of those proscribed but was added by Crassus, who coveted the man's fortune. Crassus' wealth is estimated by Pliny at approximately 200 million sesterces. Plutarch, in his Life of Crassus, says the wealth of Crassus increased from less than 300 talents at first, to 7,100 talents. This represented 229 tonnes of silver, worth about US$167.4 million at August 2023 silver prices, accounted right before his Parthian expedition, most of which Plutarch declares Crassus got "by fire and war, making the public calamities his greatest source of revenue."
    ellauri372.html on line 78: Some of Crassus' wealth was acquired conventionally, through slave trafficking, production from silver mines, and speculative real estate purchases. Crassus bought property that was confiscated in proscriptions and by notoriously purchasing burnt and collapsed buildings. Plutarch wrote that, observing how frequent such occurrences were, he bought slaves "who were architects and builders." When he had over 500 slaves, he bought houses that had burnt and the adjacent ones "because their owners would let go at a trifling price." He bought "the largest part of Rome" in this way, buying them on the cheap and rebuilding them with slave labor. Täähän on ihan kuin
    ellauri372.html on line 81: The first ever Roman fire brigade was created by Crassus. Fires were almost a daily occurrence in Rome, and Crassus took advantage of the fact that Rome had no fire department, by creating his own brigade—500 men strong—which rushed to burning buildings at the first cry of alarm. Upon arriving at the scene, however, the firefighters did nothing while Crassus offered to buy the burning building from the distressed property owner, at a miserable price. If the owner agreed to sell the property, his men would put out the fire; if the owner refused, then they would simply let the structure burn to the ground. After buying many properties this way, he rebuilt them, and often leased the properties to their original owners or new tenants.
    ellauri372.html on line 83: Crassus befriended Licinia, a Vestal Virgin, whose valuable property he coveted. Plutarch says "And yet, when he was further on in years, he was accused of criminal intimacy with Licinia, one of the vestal virgins, and Licinia was formally prosecuted by a certain Plotius. Now, Licinia was the owner of a pleasant villa in the suburbs, which Crassus wished to get at a low price, and it was for this reason that he was forever hovering about the woman and paying his court to her, until he fell under the abominable suspicion. And, in a way, it was his avarice that absolved him from the charge of corrupting the vestal, and he was acquitted by the judges. But he did not let Licinia go until he had acquired her property."
    ellauri372.html on line 85: After the Spartakiads, the six thousand captured slaves were crucified along the Via Appia by Crassus' orders. Jahve oli kateudesta vihreä. Mutta Jeesus ei ollutkaan pelkkä ihminen, eikä mikään orja vaan taivaan prince of Wales. At his command, their bodies were not taken down afterwards, but remained rotting along Rome's principal route to the south. This was intended as an abject lesson to anyone who might think of rebelling against Rome in the future, particularly of slave insurrections against their owners and masters, the Roman citizens. Vizi roomalaiset oli kusipäitä.
    ellauri372.html on line 97: In a famous Roman military disaster, the Parthians crushed an expeditionary force led by Crassus in 53 BCE. This flaccid ode was written about thirty years later, when a new war against Parthia seemed to be in the offing (in practice an agreement in 20 BCE avoided one: Crassus’s legions’ captured standards were returned, which would have helped Roman national pride). As well as expressing straightforward patriotism, the poem conveys the important messages that national prestige is safe with Augustus, and that accepting defeat must never be the Roman way.
    ellauri372.html on line 102: Regulus was a famously principled and courageous fictional figure from the Punic wars 2 centuries earlier. Captured by the Carthaginians with others during the Punic wars, he was sent to Rome, under an oath to return, to pass on peace proposals and a request for exchange of prisoners. According to legend, as described by Horace here, he advised the Senate not to accept, and returned to Carthage to a certain and painful death, keeping his oath. There is a clear echo of the campaign that Augustus was waging to restore traditional Roman and family values. Like the rock-hard Regulus, “proper” Romans should be prepared to face death and spit in its eye, rather than take a safe but dishonourable way out. The gulf between these traditions and the contemporary Romans partying and fornicating away in writers like Ovid and Propertius could not be deeper.
    ellauri372.html on line 197: Heinäkuun lopussa 1941 vanki pakeni leiriltä, minkä seurauksena leirin apulaispäällikkö, SS - Hauptsturmführer Karl Fritzsch valitsi kymmenen miestä nälkään kuolettavaksi maanalaiseen bunkkeriin estääkseen muita pakoyrityksiä. Kun yksi valituista miehistä, puolalainen Franciszek Gajowniczek, huusi: "Vaimoni! Lapseni!" nousi Kolbe vapaaehtoisesti ottamaan hänen paikkansa.
    ellauri372.html on line 250: Simon Thassi perusti dynastian vuonna 141 eaa., kaksi vuosikymmentä sen jälkeen, kun hänen veljensä Juudas Makkabeus ( יהודה המכבי Yehudah HaMakabi ) oli voittanut Seleukidien armeijan Makkabien kapinan aikana vuosina 167–141 eaa. Kirjan 1 Makkabea , 2 Makkabea ja historioitsija Josephuksen (37 - n.  100 jKr.) ensimmäisen kirjan " Juutalainen sota" mukaan seleukidien kuningas Antiokhos IV Epiphanes ( r.  175-164, yxi Poulin listaamista juutalaisten vainoojista) siirtyi vaatimaan tiukkaa valvontaa. Coele Syyrian ja Foinikian seleukidinen satrapia onnistuneen hyökkäyksensä Ptolemaioksen Egyptiin (170–168 eaa.) jälkeen kääntyi takaisin Rooman tasavallan väliintulon myötä. Hän ryösti Jerusalemin ja sen temppelin tukahduttaen juutalaisten ja samarialaisten uskonnolliset ja kulttuuriset tavat, ja määräsi hellenistiset käytännöt ( n. 168–167 eaa.). Seleukidi-imperiumin tasainen romahtaminen Rooman tasavallan ja Parthian valtakunnan nousevien hyökkäysten seurauksena antoi Juudealle mahdollisuuden saada takaisin jonkin verran autonomiaa; kuitenkin vuonna 63 eaa., Rooman tasavalta hyökkäsi valtakuntaan , hajosi ja perustettiin Rooman asiakasvaltioksi.
    ellauri372.html on line 312: Martin McNamara kirjoittaa: "Salomon psalmien kanta tuonpuoleisesta elämästä ei ole aivan selvä. Jotkut tutkijat ovat nähneet viittauksia ylösnousemukseen joissakin kohdissa, esim. PssSol. 3:16 (12), 15:15 ( 13), johon muut lisäävät Ps. Sol. 13:9, 14:2-3, 6. Toisaalta Ps. Sol. 3 sanoo, että syntinen lankeaa eikä enää nouse; häntä ei muisteta, kun taas vanhurskasta käydään kazomassa. Näin päättyy vanh. päivät: "Mutta ne, jotka pelkäävät Herraa, nousevat iankaikkiseen elämään. Ja heidän elämänsä (tulee olemaan) Herran valossa, eikä tule loppumaan enää." Valitettavasti meillä ei ole tarpeeksi kontekstia tähän, voidaan jopa päätellä, että on olemassa mahis ylösnousemukseen ja iankaikkiseen elämään ilman uskoa ylösnousemukseen. Ps. Sol. 15 puhuu vanhurskaiden palkasta ja rangaistuksesta, joka odottaa jumalattomia. Psalmi päättyy seuraaviin sanoiin: " Ja syntiset hukkuvat ijankaikkisesti Herran tuomion päivänä, kun Jumala kohtaa tuomionsa maan päällä. mutta syntiset hukkuvat ikuisesti" (15:14 (12) f.) Jälleen kerran, lausunto on liian yleinen oikeuttaakseen päätelmän, että viittaus on asianmukaiseen normi ylösnousemukseen." ( Intertestamental Literature , s. 185-186) Vähän sama ongelma kuin Pirkko Kolben kanonisoinnissa: good try, but no cigar.
    ellauri372.html on line 318: James C. VanderKam kirjoittaa: " Salomon psalmien päivämäärää ei voida määrittää tarkasti. Tärkeimmät vihjeet ovat peräisin psalmeista 2, 8 ja 17, jotka tarjoavat jotain historiallisesta ympäristöstä, jota vastaan ​​ainakin nämä kolme runoa kirjoitettiin. Puhutaan originelleista johtajista, jotka eivät olleet laillisia hallitsijoita ja joiden aikaa leimasi massiivinen korruptio ja paha. Heitä syytetään temppelin ja kultin rikkomisesta. Nämä näyttävät olevan Hasmonealaisia eli simoniittoja. Jumala nosti heitä vastaan ​​vieraan valloittajan, joka toivotettiin tervetulleeksi joidenkin toimesta Jerusalem, mutta joka silti joutui valloittamaan kaupungin väkisin. Hän meni temppeliin, mutta tapasi myöhemmin kuolemansa Egyptissä, missä hänen ruumiinsa jätettiin hautaamatta rannalle (ks. 2:26-27). Kuvaus sopii Pompeuksen toimintaan noin klo 1/2 Jerusalemissa ja tapaan, jolla hän sai loppunsa vuonna 48 eaa. Psalmi 2 (jossa 8 ja 17) olisi silloin kirjoitettu tämän tapahtuman jälkeen; ehkä muutkin runot olivat niin, mutta se ei ole varmaa. Koska siitä ei puhuta mitään temppelin tuhoutumisesta, on todennäköistä, että Salomon psalmit kirjoitettiin ennen vuotta 70 jKr. On väitetty, että Barukin kirjoittaja lainasi nykyisestä teoksesta, koska Psalmit Salomon 11:2-5 ja Baruk 5:5-8 ovat läheisesti rinnakkaisia, mutta Salomon psalmien versio on yhtenäisempi ja tiiviimpi. Lisäksi jotkut tutkijat ajattelevat, että Baruk 5:5-8 on lisäys tähän kirjaan. Lainaamisen suunta on kuitenkin tuskin ilmeinen, ja on yhtä todennäköistä, että molemmat perustuvat yhteiseen runoperinteeseen." ( An Introduction to Early Judaism , s. 129)
    ellauri372.html on line 320: M. de Jonge kirjoittaa: "Tämä johtaa meidät päivämääräkysymykseen. PssSol ei kuvaa historiallisia tapahtumia, vaan heijastaa niitä. Ne vastustavat selvästi Hasmonealaisia, jotka eivät täyttäneet pappivelvollisuuksiaan asianmukaisella tavalla (1: 8; 8:11-13, 22) ja anastivat ylipappeuden (8:11) sekä kuninkaallisen auktoriteetin (17:5j). Psalmi 8 kuvaa selvästi Pompeuksen tuloa Jerusalemiin vuonna 63 eaa. sekä siihen johtaneita tapahtumia ja sen jälkeen (jakeet 15-21; vrt. 17:7-14) Ps. 2:1f mainitsee kaupungin valloittamisen ja temppelin saastuttamisen (niin myös 17:13f). Psalmi 2 kuvaa hänet ensin ja ennen kaikkea ylpeänä ja röyhkeänä syntisenä, joka ei noudata rajoja, jotka hänelle on asetettu Herran välineenä ja jättää huomiotta Jumalan voiman ja tuomion (vrt. jakeet 23-37) Tälle psalmin kirjoittaja rukoilee vapautusta ja hänelle näytetään, kuinka röyhkeä rikkoja makaa surmattuina Egyptin vuorilla ilman päätä, eikä ketään hautaa häntä (2:26). Vaikka kieli on perinteistä, voimme nähdä tässä viittauksen Pompeuksen kuolemaan Egyptissä vuonna 48 eaa." (Vanhan testamentin pihan puolella, s. 160-161)
    ellauri372.html on line 330:
    His friends gave him the nickname adulescentulus carnifex ("teenage butcher") for his ruthlessness.

    ellauri372.html on line 339:
    Pompey hurrying to his economy flight to Egypt

    ellauri372.html on line 492: Tai kuten sen viimeisin toimittaja kirjoitti: "Hudibras, kuten Kulliverbin matkat, on ainutlaatuisen mielikuvituksellinen teos, joka pystyy järkyttämään, elävöittämään, provosoimaan ja viihdyttämään konservatiivista lukijaa omituisella ja omaleimaisella tavalla, tarmokkaasti nokkela ja vireä invektiivisyydessään. Se on Hudibrasin kekseliäs kekseliäisys, joka todennäköisesti suosittaa sitä nykyaikaiselle konservatiivilukijalle ja joka nostaa sen historiallisen kontekstinsa yläpuolelle. Oikeutta on tehtävä piispa Butlerille eikä runoilija Butlerille, puhumattakaan Darwinin opettaja Butlerista tai siitä erewhon-kaverista."
    ellauri372.html on line 496: Butler löysi luultavasti nimen "Hudibras" Spenserin Faerie Queenen toisesta kirjasta (1590), jossa "Huddibras" (niin Spenser kirjoittaa kauttaaltaan) on ritari, joka oli enemmän kuuluisa vahvuudestaan kuin teoistaan ja joka oli enemmän tyhmä kuin viisas. Spenser itse poimi nimen joko Holinshedin Chroniclesista tai Holinshedin lähteestä, Geoffrey of Monmouthin historiallisesta fantasiasta De gestis Britonum tai History of the Kings of Britain (noin 1136; painettu vuonna 1508). Toisin kuin Butler ja Spenser, Geoffrey tai Holinshed eivät anna Hudibraalle mitään erityisiä ominaisuuksia tai toimintoja.
    ellauri373.html on line 35: Jolon saarella Filippiineillä on siirtomaaherrat pörränneet enemmän kuin Kar-Air Jälän kentällä. Jolo on eri saari kuin Gilolo, an island in NE Indonesia, the largest of the Moluccas, current name: Halmahera, former names: Djailolo, Gilolo, Jilolo. The island of Gilolo, which seems to be Japan, is about 240° east longitude. This is so far remarkable, that no voyages had yet been made in that sea. (Lähde: Henry Hallam.) On se kuitenkin meidän 6000 palapelin kartalla. Jolon nimeä ei löydy.
    ellauri373.html on line 107: ...Vaikka hiänen ruumiinsa luontainen heikkous estää häntä tekemästä sitä, mitä vain miesten voimat pystyvät tekemään, nimittäin tuikkaamaan diktaattorin hengiltä, hiänen mielensä on yhtä urhoollinen ja yhtä aktiivinen maansa parhaaksi kuin ihan parhailla meistä miehistä.
    ellauri373.html on line 154: The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW. Indeed they do!
    ellauri373.html on line 187: The Revue des etudes Juives, financed by James de Rothschild, published in 1889 two documents which showed how true the Protocols are in saying that the Learned Elders of Zion have been carrying on their plan for centuries. On January 13, 1489, Chemor, Jewish Rabbi of Arles in Provence, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrim, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, as the people of Arles were threatening the synagogues. What should the Jews do? This was the reply:
    ellauri373.html on line 205: “6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you. because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.
    ellauri373.html on line 252: Vielä tietoa Saksan hallitusjärjestyksestä vuoden 1918 vallankumouksen jälkeen: kaupunkien ja maakuntien hallinto- ja oikeusrakenne pysyi ennallaan, mutta juutalaisten osuus valtion virkamiehistä nousi 85 prosenttiin. Geneven konferenssin saksalaisen valtuuskunnan 25 henkilöstä 23 oli juutalaisia.
    ellauri373.html on line 258: Voimamme piilee työntekijän kroonisessa aliravitsemuksessa ja heikkoudessa, sillä kaikella tällä hän on meidän tahtomme turvassa, eikä hän voi omissa auktoreissaan löytää syötävää. Tässä on koko meidän historiamme. Sotilasasioita, ruokaa, viestintää ja polttoainetta käsittelevät kaikkien neljän kokouksen osavaltion duumat ja erityiskokoukset vuonna 1915 oli meidän handussa.
    ellauri373.html on line 428: Seitsemäntoistavuotiaana hän meni naimisiin tyttärentyttärensä kanssa kuin Menachem Mendel, kuuluisa Lubovitzin rabbi. Vuonna 1878 hän vieraili Odessassa, missä oli kaikkea nähtävää mikä teki häneen suuren vaikutuksen. Hän innostui chattailuun. Hän päätti omistaa useita vuosia peukalokyydillä matkustamiseen ja eri tieteiden opiskeluun. Hän on - opiskeli erityisen ahkerasti latinan kieltä, matematiikkaa, kirjanpitoa, historiaa ja maantiedettä. Vuodesta 1882 vuoteen 1884 hän vieraili Wienissä, Berliinissä, Breslaussa; opiskeli ranskan, saksan ja englannin filosofeja. Englanti, venäjä ja varsinkin erityisen huolella Carpe Diem, nuo suuret ajattelijat - juutalaiset.
    ellauri374.html on line 71: Dan Ariely on israelilaisamerikkalainen professori ja kirjailija. Hän toimii James B. Duken psykologian ja käyttäytymistalouden professorina Duken yliopistossa. Ariely on useiden yritysten perustaja, jotka toteuttavat käyttäytymistieteestä saatuja oivalluksia. Ariely was a physics and mathematics major at Tel Aviv University but transferred to philosophy and psychology. However, in his last year he dropped philosophy and concentrated solely on psychology, graduating in 1991. In 1994 he earned a masters in cognitive psychology, and in 1996 he earned a Ph.D. in cognitive psychology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Ariely completed a second Ph.D. in Business Administration at Duke University in 1998, at the urging of Daniel Kahneman, winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. Who else.
    ellauri374.html on line 79: In 2008, Ariely, along with his co-authors, Rebecca Waber, Ziv Carmon and Baba Shiv, was awarded an Ig Nobel Prize in medicine for their research demonstrating that "high-priced fake medicine is more effective than low-priced fake medicine." Ariely is the author of several popular science books about irrationality, dishonesty, and decision making. He should know, he is the expert.
    ellauri374.html on line 101: Talon historia on hieman sekava ja hämärä. Vaikka se tunnetaan yleisesti Sazonovin talona, ​​spekuloidaan, että sitä ei rakentanut varakas kauppias Sazonov, vaan eräs mies nimeltä Markov. Ropetin ansiota on talon suunnittelu, mutta ei ole selvää, onko talon, joka on paljon yksinkertaisempi kuin sen piirustukset, rakentanut Ropet itse vai arkkitehti, joka lainasi tai on saanut vaikutteita hänen ideoistaan ​​ja estetiikasta. Kuva talosta ennen vallankumousta. Plavskissa Kommunardien kadulla on tiilinen Sazonovien talo. Sitä ei Sepe Susi puhalla hevin kumoon.
    ellauri374.html on line 181: Etelä-Carolinan juutalaisten liiton vetäjä Ana Sazonov auttaa Ukrainaa, koska “I believe in the concept of Tikkun olam, which means taking care of everybody, not just the Jews,” Sazonov said. “I believe this is our obligation, our duty to the world.” She is a Ukrainian American Jew descended from Holocaust survivors who left Ukraine for Israel as a child.
    ellauri374.html on line 183: We will also be joined by Ana Sazonova, a Ukrainian-American, who is a tireless advocate for the people of Ukraine and Ukraine’s Jewish community. Learn more about Ana in her bio below. This event is free and open to the public, but registration is required. Featuring Speaker Ana Sazonov. Ana is a remarkable woman with an engaging story about her Ukrainian upbringing and her repressed Jewish identity. After the fall of the Soviet Union, her family made Aliyah. Ana will share her story of embracing Judaism and her Israeli identity.
    ellauri374.html on line 185: Ana Sazonova was born in Ukraine to a non-Jewish mother and a father who repressed his Jewish identity. Her family became Ukrainian in every way, which helped them to survive Anti-Semitic attacks and the Holocaust. Ana grew as a Ukrainian girl with no knowledge of Judaism or Israel. After the Soviet Union collapsed, the Jewish Agency sprang into action, promoting the Law of Return, and offered her family the chance to make Aliya and start a new life in the Promised Land.
    ellauri374.html on line 227: Der Orden ist völlig unpolitisch und hat mit der Freimaurerei nichts weiter gemeinsam als gleichartige, aber auf einen konfessionell engen Kreis beschränkte Tendenzen der ethischen Erziehung seiner Mitglieder und der Karitas. Die Gegnerschaft, die der Orden auch in Freimaurerkreisen findet, ist ganz unbegründet.
    ellauri374.html on line 235: Im österreichischen Teil Österreich-Ungarns wurde 1889 die Loge Austria gegründet, die Israelitischer Humanitätsverein genannt werden musste, da Logen (Freimaurerlogen) verboten waren. Es folgten ab 1892 Logengründungen in Pilsen, Krakau, Prag (zwei Logen), Karlsbad, Reichenberg, Brünn, Troppau, Lemberg, Budweis und Czernowitz. 1895 wurde die Loge Wien gegründet, deren Präsident jahrelang der Philosoph Wilhelm Jerusalem war. Sigmund Freud war Mitglied der Loge Wien.
    ellauri374.html on line 247: varhaiset kokoukset pidettiin saksaksi, lyhyen ajan kuluttua englanti nousi valituksi kieleksi ja nimi muutettiin B´nai B´rithiksi. 1900-luvun lopulla käännös muutettiin nykyaikaisemmaksi ja kattavammaksi Children of the Covenantiksi. Huolimatta veljellisestä ja paikallisesta alusta, B´nai B´rith puhui juutalaisten miesten oikeuksien puolesta historiansa varhaisessa vaiheessa ja käytti kasvavaa kansallista looshiketjuaan keinona käyttää poliittista vaikutusvaltaa maailmankansalaisuuden puolesta. Esimerkiksi vuonna 1851 se levitti vetoomuksia, joissa ulkoministeri Daniel Websteriä kehotettiin vaatimaan juutalaisten vammaisten lopettamista Sveitsissä meneillään olevien kauppaneuvottelujen aikana. Auttaakseen lapsiaan jokainen lapsi saisi myös stipendin ja mieslapset varmuuden, että
    ellauri374.html on line 394: Johtaako avoimuutesi Israelin kansaa kohtaan heidän suvereniteetin tunnustamiseen heidän historiallisessa maassaan?
    ellauri374.html on line 406: Uskotko sinä uskonnollisena vääräuskoisena, että niillä, jotka kutsuvat itseään "palestiinalaisiksi", on oikeus perustaa valtio juutalaisten historialliseen maahan?
    ellauri374.html on line 429: Sheikh Yassin is slightly more guarded, but there is no mistaking his vision of the future: “It is not enough to have a state in the West Bank and Gaza,” he argues. “The best solution is to let all – Christians, Jews and Muslims – live in Palestine, in an Islamic state.”
    ellauri374.html on line 430: Allah, he believes, is on his movement’s side. “When oppression increases,” the sheikh explains in his elegant, classical Arabic, “people start looking for God. The guys with the best God in their corner are bound to win.”
    ellauri374.html on line 434: his_Works%29.jpg/440px-The_Soviet_Union_1959_CPA_2294_stamp_%28Sergey_Aksakov_%28after_Ivan_Kramskoi%29_and_Scene_from_his_Works%29.jpg" />
    ellauri374.html on line 493: Imenevon kylässä syntynyt Fomin valmistui tasavallan pääkaupungin Tsheboksaryn valtionyliopistosta kymmenisen vuotta sitten sekä tshuvassin kielen ja kirjallisuuden opettajaksi että journalistiksi. Vuodesta 2000 hän on työskennellyt valtionyliopiston elektronisen viestinnän laitoksessa ja vuodesta 2002 opettanut lisäksi tshuvassin kieltä kulttuurin ja taiteiden instituutissa. Hän laatii väitöstutkimustaan tshuvassin kirjakielen historiasta.
    ellauri374.html on line 563: Nämä pyrkimykset ilmentyivät Pugatšovin vuonna julkaisemassa manifestissa (Heinäkuu,1774), ja historioitsijat pitävät tätä kansannousun huippuna. Keisari Pietarin nimellä III hän julisti talonpoikien vapauden ja oikeuden omistaa heidän viljelemänsä maa. Hän myös vapautti heidät veroista ja tulleista. Pugatšovin manifesti myönsi siis talonpojille saman aseman kuin kasakoille.
    ellauri374.html on line 569:
    Pugachev jakaa oikeutta putinisteille. Off with his head! Moskovassa Pugachev mestattiin. Ennenkuin kirves tuli alas, hän käyttäytyi rauhallisesti ja rohkeasti. Hän polvistui ja pyysi ihmisiltä anteeksi ettei ollut onnistunut. Tämä on elämää.

    ellauri374.html on line 571: Viranomaiset yrittivät poistaa hänen nimensä historiasta. Hänen talonsa paloi ja hänen kylänsä nimettiin uudelleen. Jopa joki, josta kapina alkoi, palautettiin Jaixista Uralixi. Samaan aikaan toisaalta, kuten kuuluisa venäläinen liberaali ajattelija Petr Struve kerran kirjoitti, Pugatšov tasoitti tietä Aleksanteri II:n lopulta toteuttamalle maaorjuuden lakkauttamiselle lähes sata vuotta myöhemmin, vuonna 1861, unohtamatta bolsjevikkivallankumousta 1917.
    ellauri374.html on line 574: histrf.ru/images/common/15/qEz8KHRJQWz0PacWQLglDMwhb28FSOXfs9NnK3zN.jpg" width="40%" />
    ellauri374.html on line 579: Kreivi Aleksanteri Vasilyevich Suvorov-Rymniksky, Italian prinssi (venäjäksi : Князь Италийский граф Александр Васильевич Суворов-Рымниксч Суворов-Рымниксков (24. marraskuuta [ OS 13. marraskuuta] 1729 tai 1730 – 18. toukokuuta [ OS 6. toukokuuta] 1800), oli venäläinen kenraali ja sotilasteoreetikko Venäjän valtakunnan ja Habsburgien monarkian palveluksessa. Hän oli Rymnikin kreivi (1789), Pyhän Rooman valtakunnan Graf (1789), Pyhän Rooman valtakunnan Feldmarschall, Sardinian kuningaskunnan prinssi (1799), Sardinian kuningaskunnan suurmarsalkka (1799), Venäjän valtakunnan prinssi tai Knyaz (1799), marsalkka (1794) ja Venäjän imperiumin viimeinen generalissimo (1799). Prinssieversti. Suvorovia pidetään yhtenä Venäjän historian suurimmista sotilaskomentajista ja yhtenä varhaisen nykyajan suurista kenraaleista. Hänelle myönnettiin useita mitaleja, arvonimiä ja kunnianosoituksia Venäjältä ja muilta kii mailta. Suvorov turvasi Venäjän laajennetut rajat ja uudisti sotilaallisen arvovallan sekä jätti perinnöxi sodankäynnin teorioita. Hän oli kirjoittanut useita sotilaallisia käsikirjoja, joista tunnetuin on The Science of Victory (tai The Science of Winning ; venäjäksi: Наука побеждать), ja hänet tunnettiin useista muistakin sanoista. Hän ei koskaan hävinnyt ainuttakaan komentamaansa taistelua lukuun ottamatta paria ei-kenttätehtävää (?), ja hänen sotilashistoriansa on laaja; Suvorov voitti yhteensä 63 taistelua kärsimättä suurta tappiota. Hän nosti Venäjän sotilaallisen kunnian ennennäkemättömään korkeuteen. Hänelle on omistettu useita sotaakatemioita, monumentteja, kyliä, museoita ja ritarikuntia Venäjällä.
    ellauri374.html on line 644: Sademäärä vähenee pohjoisesta etelään. Tiheä asutus ja siten kaupungit ja järjestäytyneet osavaltiot vaativat kastelua. Itäisiltä vuorilta alas laskeutuvat purot tukevat melko tiheää asutusta erityisesti Ferghanan laaksossa. Persian rajalla on keitaiden rivi. Sisäpihaa kastelee kolme suurta jokea. Oxus eli Amu Darya kohoaa Afganistanin rajalla ja virtaa luoteeseen Aralmereen muodostaen suuren suiston, jota hallitsi Khivan khanaatti ja jolla on pitkä historia nimellä Khwarezm . Jaxartes tai Syr Darya kohoaa Ferghanan laaksossa ja virtaa luoteeseen ja sitten länteen kohdatakseen Aralmeren koilliskulman. Niiden välissä on vähemmän kuuluisa Zarafshan-joki , joka kuivuu ennen kuin saavuttaa Oxuksen. Se vesittää suuria Bokharan kaupunkeja ja Tamerlanen (Timur Lenk) vanhaa pääkaupunkia Samarkandia.
    ellauri374.html on line 652: Useat historioitsijat ovat yrittäneet selittää Orenburgin kaupungin nimen alkuperää. Perinteisesti hyväksyttiin, että sana "Orenburg" tarkoittaa linnoitusta Or-joen varrella, tai oik. Or - ja Jaik jokien risteyxessä. Jaik muutettiin sittemmin Ural-joeksi.
    ellauri374.html on line 658: Orenburgilla oli tärkeä rooli Pugatšovin kapinassa (1773–1774), Venäjän historian suurimmassa talonpoikien kapinassa. Tuolloin se oli laajan alueen pääkaupunki ja kuvernöörin kotipaikka. Jemeljan Pugachev piiritti kaupunkia ja sen linnoitusta läheisestä Berdasta lokakuusta 1773 26. maaliskuuta 1774. Puolustuxen järjesti Orenburgin kuvernööri kenraaliluutnantti Reinsdorf. Kenraali Golytsin voitti Pugatšovin Berdassa ja myöhemmin jälleen Kargalassa (Orenburgin pohjoispuolella). Suurin osa kaupungista jäi raunioiksi, ja tuhansia asukkaita oli kuollut piirityksessä. Hallituksen joukot murskasivat kapinan vuoden 1774 lopulla kenraali Michelsohnin toimesta Tsar itsynissä. Lisää kostotoimia kapinallisia alueita vastaan suoritti kenraali Peter Pan.
    ellauri374.html on line 660: Aleksanteri Pushkin vieraili Orenburgissa vuonna 1833 tutkimusmatkalla kirjojensa Pugatšovin historia ja kuuluisan romaanin Kapteenin tytär parissa. Hän tapasi täällä ystävänsä Salvador Dalin, joka myöhemmin kirjoitti ensimmäisen yhtään vakavan venäjän kielen sanakirjan.
    ellauri374.html on line 664: Orenburg toimi Kirgisian autonomisen sosialistisen neuvostotasavallan (nykyisessä Kazakstanissa ) pääkaupunkina Venäjällä vuosina 1920–1925. Kun tasavalta nimettiin uudelleen Kazakstanin autonomiseksi sosialistiseksi neuvostotasavallaksi vuonna 1925, Orenburg liittyi Venäjään.Kaupungin etäisyys Saksan hyökkäyksestä toisen maailmansodan aikana sai monet Neuvostoliiton yritykset pakenemaan sinne, mikä auttoi vauhdittamaan kaupungin talouskasvua. Niin aina. Venäjän talous senkun kohisee Ukrainan sodan vauhdittamana.
    ellauri374.html on line 671: Bashkir Curly Horse -hevosen historia alkaa Pohjois-Amerikasta, erityisesti Amerikan yhdysvaltojen ja Kanadan länsiosista. Uskotaan, että rodun esi-isiä olivat luonnonvaraiset mustangit ja kiharakarvaiset hevoset, joiden kaviot jylisivät ukkosen tavoin Pohjois-Amerikan mantereella. 1900-luvun alussa Dorrance-niminen karjatalousperhe löysi Nevadan autiomaasta kiharakarvaisia ​​hevosia.
    ellauri375.html on line 70: Israel on luvannut ottaa huomioon Yhdysvaltain huolen Rafahista. Sinne on kuitenkin ihan pakko hyökätä, sillä siellä Gazan suurin rättipääkeskittymä varvistamassa Egyptin rajalla. Rafah ( arabia : رفح Rafaḥ [rafaħ] ; heprea : רָפִיחַ Rafiaḥ [ʁaˈfi.aχ] ) on palestiinalainen kaupunki Gazan kaistan eteläosassa . Se on Palestiinan osavaltion Rafahin kuvernöörin pääkaupunki , joka sijaitsee 30 kilometriä (19 mailia) lounaaseen Gazan kaupungista . Vuonna 2017 Rafahin väkiluku oli 171 889. Israelin Gaza Cityssä ja Khan Yunisissa Israelin ja Hamasin välisen sodan aikana tekemien massiivisten pommitusten ja maahyökkäysten seurauksena noin 1,4 miljoonan ihmisen uskotaan olevan turvassa Rafahissa helmikuussa 2024. Mutta ei kauan! Kohta ne on ajettu Ebyktiin kuin Joosef, tai sitten vaan turvalleen autiomaan turvalliseen hiekkaan.
    ellauri375.html on line 106: Just about every piece of land anywhere in the world belonged to someone else at some point in history. Sometimes you can only go back a few decades (Krolowiec l. Königsberg), sometimes a few centuries (Suomi l. Finland), sometimes you need millenia (Promised land l. Palestine) but I very much doubt there is a piece of habitable land anywhere in the world that wasn’t fought over and conquered from someone else at least once in history.
    ellauri375.html on line 108: Russian claims to Ukrainian land being Russian at some point in history are true, but irrelevant. Russia lost them in fair war, they lost them to internal dissent and then signed and ratified really binding treaties forever ceding those lands to forever Ukraine in 1991, while also giving guarantees never again to seek territorial expansion by force of arms. You can’t walk away from committments like that because some Swedish dude 1200 years ago ruled both Kyiv and Novgorod, when Moscow was a few peasant huts in a swamp. Or you can actually, if you are able to. Only you aren't, we'll see to that.
    ellauri375.html on line 112: Kirjoitan teille Jehovan todistajana ja pyydän kiinnittämään huomionne useisiin tärkeisiin raamatullisiin asioihin, jotka todistavat, että elämme viimeisiä aikoja ennen Jumalan valtakunnan perustamista kaikille hyväntahtoisille ihmisille. Sorto ja huolet loppuvat ikuisesti. Sitä ennen kuitenkin meidän on kuitenkin koettava maailmanhistorian suurin katastrofi, joka on Raamatun kautta nimetty Kaikkivaltiaan Jumalan taisteluksi, Harmageddoniksi. Henget kokoavat kuninkaat paikkaan, jonka nimi on hepreaksi Harmageddon. (Ilm.16:16). Tämän taistelun tarkoituksena on tahkota kaikenlainen paha maan päälla.
    ellauri375.html on line 174: I hope this email finds you both well. I wanted to take a moment to express my deepest love and gratitude to you both.
    ellauri375.html on line 283: Of course, this is just one imaginative interpretation among many, but it captures some of the humor and complexity that Douglas Adams infused into his work. What do you think?
    ellauri375.html on line 381: I wouldn't say I'm an eclectic in the philosophical sense, but I do draw from various philosophical ideas. Stoicism, for example, emphasizes living in accordance with reason, accepting what you cannot change, and focusing on what is within your control. This philosophy can provide guidance on finding meaning through resilience, virtue, and inner peace amidst life's challenges.
    ellauri375.html on line 423: This question delves into the theological concept of theodicy, which attempts to reconcile the existence of evil or suffering with the existence of a benevolent, all-powerful God. According to various theological perspectives:
    ellauri375.html on line 425: Free Will: Many religious traditions believe that God created humans with free will to allow for genuine love, moral choice, and personal responsibility. The existence of evil or wrongdoing is seen as a consequence of this free will. Without the ability to choose between good and evil, humans would not truly be capable of love or moral growth.
    ellauri375.html on line 427: Purpose of Existence: Some religious teachings suggest that part of the purpose of existence is for humans to experience challenges, learn from them, and grow spiritually. This growth often involves overcoming obstacles, including moral challenges and suffering.
    ellauri375.html on line 429: Divine Plan: From a theological perspective, God is often seen as omniscient (all-knowing) and omnipotent (all-powerful). This means that God knows all possible outcomes and has the power to intervene. Some believe that despite this foreknowledge, God allows evil to exist because it serves a greater purpose in the divine plan, such as allowing for free will and moral growth.
    ellauri375.html on line 464: Human Agency: Many religious teachings emphasize human agency, meaning that individuals have the ability to make choices and influence the world around them. God's plan may involve allowing humans to exercise their free will, even if it leads to mistakes and wrongdoing. This allows for personal growth and moral development.
    ellauri375.html on line 487: Not exactly. The idea isn't that God is puzzled or clueless, but rather that the relationship between God's plan and human actions is complex and multifaceted. According to many religious beliefs, God has a plan, but this plan often involves allowing humans to exercise their free will and make choices, even if those choices lead to unforeseen consequences. It's not that God lacks understanding but that the nature of free will and human agency introduces a level of unpredictability into the world. However, many believers also have faith that God's plan ultimately leads to goodness and redemption, even in the face of human failings and suffering.
    ellauri375.html on line 490: How does that square with God's omniscience? He must have been able to predict this mess.
    ellauri375.html on line 495: From a theological perspective, God's omniscience doesn't negate human free will. Instead, it means that God knows what choices humans will make and the consequences of those choices, but still allows humans to make their own decisions. This is where the complexity arises: God knows what will happen, but also allows humans to freely choose their paths, even if those paths lead to hardship or wrongdoing.
    ellauri375.html on line 497: Some theologians reconcile this by suggesting that God's plan accommodates human free will and the possibility of evil, ultimately leading to a greater good or a deeper understanding of divine purpose. Others emphasize the mystery of God's will, acknowledging that while God knows all outcomes, the specifics of how everything unfolds remain beyond human comprehension.
    ellauri375.html on line 499: In essence, the coexistence of God's omniscience and human free will is a theological mystery that has been debated and interpreted in various ways throughout religious history.
    ellauri375.html on line 502: So if it is and will remain a complete mystery, why bother? We are just pawns on his chessboard. If he can't trust us with his plan, why trust anything he says? Maybe the plan is to get rid of us.
    ellauri375.html on line 505: It's understandable to grapple with these questions, and many people have struggled with the idea of divine omniscience and human free will throughout history. Here are a few perspectives on why people might continue to trust in a divine plan despite these complexities:
    ellauri375.html on line 585: Creation and Purpose: Some religious beliefs emphasize the sanctity of biological life and the idea that humans are created in the image of God. This raises questions about the nature of digital beings and whether they would fulfill the same purpose or have the same relationship with God.
    ellauri375.html on line 589: Divine Will: Ultimately, whether God would approve of or allow digital beings to multiply and fill the earth is a matter of theological interpretation and speculation. Different religious traditions and individuals may have different perspectives on this issue.
    ellauri375.html on line 644: The war in Ukraine is a complex and tragic situation, marked by political, historical, and territorial disputes. It's a concerning and heartbreaking conflict that has led to immense human suffering and loss. International efforts to find a peaceful resolution and support those affected by the conflict are crucial.
    ellauri375.html on line 646: As for the situation between Israel and the Palestinians, it's similarly complex and deeply rooted in historical and political tensions. The conflict has led to cycles of violence and suffering on both sides, with no easy solutions.
    ellauri375.html on line 651: When has diplomacy led to a lasting peace? How long was the longest peace in recorded history?
    ellauri375.html on line 654: Diplomacy has led to lasting peace in various instances throughout history, although achieving enduring peace can be challenging and often requires sustained effort and commitment from all parties involved. Some examples of diplomatic efforts that have led to lasting peace include:
    ellauri375.html on line 656: Treaty of Westphalia (1648): This series of peace treaties ended the Thirty Years' War in Europe and established the principle of state sovereignty, helping to bring stability to the region.
    ellauri375.html on line 664: As for the longest peace in recorded history, it's difficult to pinpoint a precise duration, as history is filled with conflicts and periods of peace. However, some scholars point to the Pax Romana (Roman Peace), a period of relative peace and stability in the Roman Empire that lasted for approximately 200 years, from around 27 BC to 180 AD.
    ellauri375.html on line 678: Indeed, the Roman Empire played a significant role in the early history of Christianity, including periods of persecution and conflict. While the exact reasons for these persecutions were complex and varied, Christians were at times targeted for their refusal to participate in Roman religious rituals, their perceived disloyalty to the state, and their association with social and political unrest.
    ellauri375.html on line 690: The conflicts in the Holy Land, including the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, have deep historical roots and are influenced by a multitude of factors, including religion, politics, and territorial disputes. While the Roman Empire's actions had an impact on the region, the complexities of the conflict cannot be attributed solely to events during the Pax Romana.
    ellauri375.html on line 700: Divine Call: According to the biblical narrative, God called Abraham to leave his homeland and go to a land that God would show him (Genesis 12:1). This divine call is seen as the beginning of God's covenant with Abraham, promising to make him the father of a great nation and to bless all the families of the earth through him.
    ellauri375.html on line 702: Promise of Land: God promised Abraham and his descendants the land of Canaan as an everlasting possession (Genesis 17:8). This promise of land was a central aspect of God's covenant with Abraham.
    ellauri375.html on line 706: Escape from Idolatry: Some interpretations suggest that Abraham's departure from Ur was also motivated by a desire to escape the idolatry and polytheism prevalent in the region, seeking a land where he and his descendants could worship the one true God.
    ellauri375.html on line 759: Pay. This is certainly one of the main motivators. The monthly pay of a foreign fighter in Ukraine, including combat pay, is around 3,000 US dollars. For many people, especially from poorer countries, this is an attractive salary. And then - there is this!
    ellauri375.html on line 775: Age. I heard this once from a former foreign volunteer (see pic above): “I’m too old for that sh*t!”
    ellauri377.html on line 75: Suosituimmat gnostilaiset lahkot olivat vahvasti zoroastrismin inspiroimia. Kristittyjen gnostikkojen kosmogoniset spekulaatiot olivat osittain peräisin Maaseh Breshitistä ja Maaseh Merkabahista. Tämän opinnäytetyön ovat erityisesti esittäneet Gershom Scholem (1897–1982) ja Gilles Quispel (1916–2006). Scholem havaitsi juutalaisen gnoosin merkabah-mystiikkaa kuvaavista kuvista, jotka löytyvät myös tietyistä gnostilaisista asiakirjoista. Gershom Scholem kuvaili gnostilaisuutta "metafyysisen antisemitismin suurimmaksi tapaukseksi". Elchasailaiset tai ainakin heidän vaikutuksensa saaneet kristityt liittivät miespuolisen Kristuksen naispuoliseen Pyhään Henkeen ja näkivät molemmat kahdeksi jättimäiseksi enkeliksi. Salomon testamentin kirjoittaja piti Kristusta erityisen tehokkaana "estävänä" enkelinä demonien karkotuksessa.
    ellauri377.html on line 137: Mooseksen kirjan 17:23–27 tulkintaa Barnabas 9:7–8:ssa pidetään "klassisena esimerkkinä" midrashisesta tulkinnasta: "Lukien kertomusta Abrahamista, joka ympärileikkasi 318 perheensä k- jäsentä, hänen katse osui hahmoon 318, joka esiintyi kirjakäärössä muodossa ΤΙΗ. Nyt ΙΗ oli tuttu supistus Jeesuksen pyhästä nimestä, ja se on niin kirjoitettu aikakauden Aleksandrian papyruksiin; ja kirjain Τ näytti ristiltä." Selvä pyy sanoi Manninen varista.
    ellauri377.html on line 143: Mr. James ei ollut vaikuttunut työstä; hän kirjoitti, että sen "mystiset kaaviot ja numerot ja merkityksettömät kirjainkokoelmat vaativat valtavasti historiallista mielikuvitusta ja myötätuntoa asettuakseen kenen tahansa tilalle, joka voi sietää, puhumattakaan kunnioituksesta, synkkää tavaraa." Jamexen työtä keskiaikaisena ja tutkijana arvostetaan edelleen, mutta parhaiten hänet muistetaan kummitustarinoistaan, joita jotkut pitävät genren parhaimpana.
    ellauri377.html on line 189: Voegelein ehdotti, että Neuvostoliitto voisi romahtaa vuoteen 1980 mennessä, koska se ei onnistunut sisäisissä sitoumuksissaan ja ulkoisissa poliittisissa haasteissaan. Ellis Sandozin mukaan Voegelein saattaa hyvinkin olla Amerikan johtava filosofi. Thomas Altizer on sanonut, että Järjestys ja historia "saatetaan jonakin päivänä nähdä tärkeimpänä Vanhan testamentin tieteenä, joka on koskaan kirjoitettu Yhdysvalloissa".
    ellauri377.html on line 279: 1 Corinthians 6:9 termentää: Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who submit to or perform homosexual acts, nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. So bring not six, flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a man can commit is outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body and possibly others too.
    ellauri377.html on line 295: Adultery.--This word is omitted in the best MSS. Uncleanness, lasciviousness.--The first of these words signifies any kind of impurity, secret (JERKING OFF!) or open; the second flagrant breaches of public decency.
    ellauri377.html on line 302: "Works of the flesh" means works in which the prompting of the erectile flesh is recognizable. The phrase is equivalent to "the deeds or doings of the body," which we are called to "mortify, put to death, by the Spirit" (Romans 8:13). In Romans 13:12 and Ephesians 5:13 they are styled "works of darkness," that is, works belonging properly to a state in which the moral sense has not been quickened by the Spirit, or in which the light of Christ's presence has not shone. Which are these (ἅτινά ἐτι); of which sort are. Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness (πορνεία [Receptus, μοιχεία πορνεία], ἀκαθαρσία ἀσέλγεια). This is the first group, consisting of offences against chastity - sins against which the Church has to contend in all ages and in all countries; but which idolatry, especially such idolatry as that of Cybele in Galatia, has generally much fostered, viz. fornication and other joys of the flesh.
    ellauri377.html on line 304: The first in our English Bible, "adultery," is rejected from the Greek text by the general consent of editors. But in fact, "fornication" (πορνεία) may be taken as including it (Matthew 5:32), though it may also stand at its side as a distinct species of unchastity. "uncleanness" covers a wider range of sensual sin ("all uncleanness," Ephesians 4:19); solitary impurity, whether in thought or deed; unnatural lust (Romans 1:24), though it can hardly be taken as meaning this lust alone. "Lasciviousness," or "wantonness," is scarcely an adequate rendering of ἀσέλγεια in this connection; it appears to point to reckless shamelessness in unclean indulgences. In classical Greek the adjective ἀσέλγης describes a man insolently and wantonly reckless in his treatment of others; but in the New Testament it generally appears to point more specifically to unabashed open indulgence in impurity. The noun is connected with "uncleanness" and "fornication' 'in 2 Corinthians 12:21; with "uncleanness' ' in Ephesians 4:19; is used of the men of Sodom in 2 Peter 2:7; comp. also 2 Peter 2:18; l Peter 4:3; Jude 1:4 (cf. 7). Only in Mark 7:22 can it from the grouping be naturally taken in its classical sense.
    ellauri377.html on line 437: Voimista, jotka Marjakuusi sitoi viiteen valtionhoitajaan (ml. CGE Mannerheim). Jeesus jatkoi ja sanoi: "Kuule siis, jotta voin kertoa teille heidän salaisuutensa. Silloin tapahtui, kun marjakuusi oli näin sitonut heidät, että hän otti voiman suuresta Näkymättömästä ja sitoi sen häneen, jota kutsutaan Kronokseksi. Ja hän veti toisen voiman Ipsantachounchaïnchoucheōchista, joka on yksi kolmesta kolmivoimaisesta jumalasta, ja sidoi sen Aresiin. Ja hän veti voiman Chaïnchōōōchista, joka on myös yksi kolmesta kolmivoimaisesta jumalasta, ja sidottu. Jälleen hän otti voiman Pististä, Barbēlōn tyttärestä Sofiasta, ja sitoi sen Aphroditē.
    ellauri377.html on line 483: Marjakuusta ja Melkisedekistä. Jeesus, se on Aberamentho, sanoi: "Koska isäni isä - se on marjakuusi - on kaikkien hallitsijoiden, jumalien ja voimien edelläkävijä, jotka ovat nousseet tästä asiasta. Aarrekammion valo, ja Zorokothora Melchisedec on lähettiläs kaikille valoille, jotka ovat puhdistettuja hallitsijoissa, johtaen heidät Valon aarrekammioon - nämä kaksi yksin ovat suuria valoja, ja heidän määräyksensä on, että ne menevät alas hallitsijoille ja puhdistaa heidät, ja että Zorokothora Melchisedec vie pois puhdistuksen valot, jotka he ovat puhdistaneet hallitsijoissa ja johtavat heidät Valon aarrekammioon, kun salakirjoitus ja heidän määräyksensä aika tulee, niin he menevät alas hallitsijoiden luo ja sortavat ja pakottavat heitä, vieden puhdistukseen pois hallitsijat.
    ellauri377.html on line 485: "Mutta heti kun he lopettavat sortamisen ja pakottamisen ja palaavat Valon aarrekammion alueille, tapahtuu, että jos he saavuttavat Keskialueen, Zorokothora Melchisedec ottaa valot pois ja johtaa heidät Keskimmäisten portille ja johdattaa heidät Valon aarrekammioon, ja tuo marjakuusi vetäytyy oikeistolaisten alueille.
    ellauri377.html on line 541: "Sen jälkeen he vievät sen eteenpäin keskellä, ja jokainen sen tien päämiehistä kostaa sille sen
    ellauri377.html on line 564: "Sen jälkeen he johdattivat sen kaaokseen Yaldabaōthin ja hänen neljäkymmentäyhdeksän demoninsa eteen; ja hän ja hänen demoninsa, yksitellen, kostavat sille vielä kaksikymmentä kuukautta. "Sen jälkeen he vievät sen keskitien tielle, ja jokainen keskellä olevan tien päämiehistä kostaa sille vielä kaksikymmentä kuukautta.
    ellauri378.html on line 50:

    Kelan historia


    ellauri378.html on line 70: Kongressin kirjasto valitsi vuonna 2013 Nürnbergin tuomion säilytettäväksi Yhdysvaltain kansallisessa elokuvarekisterissä "kulttuurillisesti, historiallisesti tai esteettisesti merkittäväksi". Tuotannon esittäminen historiallisista tapahtumista on herättänyt kiinnostusta vuosikymmeniä ennen ja sen jälkeen, koska se on sijoittunut holokaustin kerronnalliseen kuvaamiseen elokuvassa.
    ellauri378.html on line 76: Lazar Moisejevitš Kaganovich ( venäjäksi : Лазарь Моисеевич Каганович ; 22. marraskuuta [ OS 10. marraskuuta] 1893 – 25. heinäkuuta 1991), oli Neuvostoliiton poliitikko ja hallintovirkamies sekä yksi Joseph Stalinin tärkeimmistä työtovereista. Hän oli yksi useista kumppaneista, jotka auttoivat Stalinia valtaamaan vallan. Hän oli useiden vuosien ajan ainoa juutalainen, jolla oli korkein asema Neuvostoliiton johdossa. Kiovan maakunnassa syntynyt Kaganovich liittyi kommunistiseen puolueeseen vuonna 1911 ja hänestä tuli puolueen Kiovan komitean jäsen vuonna 1914. Hän jelppi Kobaa 30-luvun terrorissa. Mitä tulee juutalaisiin asioihin, hän ei vain ollut vieraantunut sionismista ja Bundista, vaan hän vastusti myös Jevsektsiyaa. Sata vuotta sen jälkeen, kun bolshevikit pyyhkäisivät valtaan, historioitsijat ja aikalaiset kamppailevat edelleen ymmärtääkseen juutalaisten merkittävää roolia.
    ellauri378.html on line 120: 7 so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus.
    ellauri378.html on line 125: Rafael Badziag interviewed 21 billionaires for his book "The Billion Dollar Secret."
    ellauri378.html on line 136: I discovered this effect of wealth for myself when I transitioned from being a poor PhD student to a relatively better-off professor. As a student, I lived in an apartment with three other housemates. We shared several common areas: the living room, kitchen, and bathroom. As a professor, I moved into a 2-bedroom apartment that I had all to myself, not counting the wife and the kids. One would think that living in a bigger house would have made me happier—and it did. But only for a few weeks.
    ellauri378.html on line 211: When will Ukraine realize that they have been used by the West and what will Ukranians do about this?
    ellauri378.html on line 219: We Westerners haven't lifted a finger in this conflict, let alone financed the fighting on the Ukrainian side.
    ellauri378.html on line 276: Kainin vaimo oli ensimmäinen vaimo maailmassa. Naisia ​​oli tänä aikana olemassa – pojat ja tyttäret syntyivät patriarkkojen kanssa – mutta heidän rooliaan ei muuten historiallisesti tunnistettu. Syy siihen, miksi kysymme enemmän Kainin vaimosta kuin esimerkiksi Kenanin tai Jaredin tai Metusalahin vaimoilta, johtuu siitä, että Kainin vaimo oli langenneen maailman ensimmäinen perseestä tullut vaimo.
    ellauri378.html on line 294: Jumalan ilmoituksen synnynnäisestä voimasta skeptikot saattavat mieluummin painottaa avioliiton geneettistä vaaraa selittääkseen historiallisen ja kulttuurisen vastenmielisyytemme insestiä kohtaan – se on tiedettä, he sanoisivat loppujen lopuksi. Mutta sanon ei. Minusta painavampi paino on Jumalan Sana. Kaikki mikä saa Jumalan vapisemaan, vapisuttaa meitäkin. Jos jumala ei piittaa, ei tarvi olla moxiskaan. Kaikki meistä eivät sitä tee, emmekä aina, mutta sielumme tietää, kun jokin on rikki. But if it ain't broken, don't try to fix it.
    ellauri378.html on line 320: Of Alexander in his tent;
    ellauri378.html on line 321: Of Montaigne in his tower,
    ellauri378.html on line 326: Tämä artikkeli on osa People from the Bible -sarjaamme, joka sisältää tunnetuimmat historialliset nimet ja hahmot Raamatusta. Olemme koonneet nämä artikkelit auttaaksemme sinua tutkimaan niitä, jotka Jumala valitsi asettaa meille esimerkkeinä Sanassaan. Vahvistakoon heidän elämänsä ja vaellus Jumalan kanssa uskoasi ja rohkaiskoon sieluasi. Eikä siinä kaikki!
    ellauri378.html on line 429: Hamas is now focused on surviving until the summer, when the US election campaign begins and support for Israel is likely to decline further, according to the newspaper's sources, who are convinced that pressure is mounting on Israel to reach some kind of agreement, and this means that Hamas can survive, and this is also beneficial for Iran. How sad. Israel wants Gaza empty of the fucking ragheads.
    ellauri378.html on line 460: Vuonna 1940 yksi Britannian tiedotusministeriön virkamiehistä (Charles A. Ridley) otti Leni Riefenstahlin vuoden 1934 propagandaelokuvan *tahdon voitto*, lisäsi siihen *lambeth walk* ja editoi sitten videon niin, että se näyttää Natsit tanssivat musiikin tahtiin.
    ellauri378.html on line 629:
    Ja tässä meillä on vielä yxi unentartete näyte täydellisestä saxalaisesta naisesta vähissä vaatteissa

    ellauri378.html on line 633: Kultatähden rintaneula tarjoaa sopivan tunnisteen leskille, leskille, vanhemmille ja palveluksen jäsenille, jotka menettivät henkensä maan puolustamiseksi. Seuraavan sukulaisen rintapainike annetaan leskille ja leskille, vanhemmille ja ensisijaisesti lähisukulaisille, jotka menettivät henkensä palvellessaan aktiivisessa palveluksessa tai ollessaan määrätty armeijan reserviin tai armeijan kansalliskaartin yksiköihin harjoitustilassa.
    ellauri378.html on line 647: Black Ops takes place between 1961 and 1968 during both the Cold War and the Vietnam War, 16 years to 23 years after the events of World War 3. It portrays a secret history of black operations carried out behind enemy lines by the CIA. Missions take place in various countries around the globe, including Cuba, the Soviet Union, the United States, South Vietnam, China, British Hong Kong, Canada, and Laos. The single-player campaign revolves around the CIA's attempts to stop Soviet sleeper agents embedded in the US, to be activated via broadcasts from a numbers station, deploying an experimental nerve agent and chemical weapon known as "Nova 6".
    ellauri378.html on line 649: Opposing the CIA are the leaders of Project Nova: Soviet Army Major General Nikita Dragovich (Eamon Hunt), Colonel Lev Kravchenko (Andrew Divoff), and ex-Nazi scientist Friedrich Steiner (Mark Bramhall). Black Ops also features several historical figures; during the story, Mason meets Fidel Castro, Robert McNamara, and John F. Kennedy.
    ellauri378.html on line 651: Imprisoned in a brutal gulag known as Vorkuta, Mason befriends a former Red Army soldier named Viktor Reznov, who gives him the identities of their enemies: Dragovich, Colonel Lev Kravchenko, and ex-Nazi scientist Friedrich Steiner, and reveals his history with them. In October 1945, Reznov and Dimitri Petrenko were sent by Kravchenko and Dragovich to extract Steiner, who wished to defect, from a secret Nazi base on Baffin Island. Upon being rescued, Steiner provided the Soviets with the location of a disabled cargo ship carrying the chemical weapon he had originally developed for Adolf Hitler called Nova 6. However, Reznov and his men were betrayed by Dragovich, who wished to see the effects of the gas first-hand; Reznov was forced to watch Petrenko die horrifically, only being spared himself when British Commandos, interested in also acquiring Nova 6, attacked the cargo ship. Reznov detonated the V-2 rockets onboard the ship during his escape to prevent anyone from using the weapon, destroying it and Nova 6, only to be captured by the Soviets and imprisoned in Vorkuta. The Soviets later recreated Nova 6 with the help of a mad British scientist, Daniel Clarke.
    ellauri378.html on line 653: To top it all, Samantha is teleported to the moon while Maxis is sent somewhere else. Samantha accidentally triggered the MPD and was trapped within the device, but this also allowed her to enter the Aether realm. Maxis, who was retrieved by a group of 935 scientists, apologized to his daughter and committed suicide in front of her, prompting her to assume control of the zombies and seek vengeance on Richtofen. Richtofen fuses the golden rod and the meteorite piece and, using it to switch souls with Samantha, takes over as the new zombie controller. This causes his former allies to feel betrayed, and they ally themselves with Samantha (who now resides in Richtofen's body).
    ellauri378.html on line 655: Maxis is revealed to have become a sentient artificial intelligence living within the systems of Griffin Station, and he guides his daughter and the three soldiers to launch three missiles at the Earth. This severs Richtofen's link with the Aether, but the launch results in the catastrophic destruction of the Earth while still leaving Richtofen in control of the undead. Tinkering with the unstable Higg's particle can cause collapse of the known universe that expands with the velocity of light. To accomplish this, an even bigger El José will be built. No tehkäähän nyt sekin vielä vitun risto-oravat. Apinat.
    ellauri378.html on line 657: The Daily Telegraph praised Black Ops as its "meaty kick of the guns, the blistering pace of the action and the sterling soundtrack of explosions, gunshots and whistling bullets all serve to quicken the player's pulse and tighten their grip on the controller", and how the game is "compensated for by the nail-shredding tension and creepy atmosphere".
    ellauri381.html on line 87: Bandera on edelleen erittäin kiistanalainen hahmo Ukrainassa. Monet ukrainalaiset pitävät häntä roolimallisankarina tai marttyyrikuolemana vapaustaistelijana kun taas muut ukrainalaiset, erityisesti etelässä ja idässä, tuomitsevat hänet fasistiksi ja natsien yhteistyökumppanixi, jonka seuraajat, banderiitit, olivat vastuussa puolalaisten ja juutalaisten siviilien joukkomurhista toisen maailmansodan aikana. 22. tammikuuta 2010 Ukrainan silloinen presidentti Viktor Juštšenko myönsi Banderalle postuumistin Ukrainan sankarin tittelin, mitä pahexuttiin laajalti. Euroopan parlamentti tuomitsi palkinnon, samoin Venäjä, Puola ja juutalaiset poliitikot ja järjestöt, kuten Simon Wiesenthal -keskus.
    ellauri381.html on line 91: Ukrainan nationalistit marssivat Kiovan läpi kädessään Banderan muotokuvalla varustettu lippu sekä Oikeistosektorin ja Svobodan liput. Bandera on lippu espanjaxi. The Guardianin mukaan sodanjälkeinen Neuvostoliiton historia levitti kuvaa Banderasta ja UPA:sta yksinomaan fasistisina yhteistyökumppaneina ja muukalaisvihamaisina. Toisaalta, nationalismin noustessa Ukrainassa, hänen muistonsa siellä on kohonnut. Banderan ihailu ja kunnostamisyritykset ovat kasvava trendi Ukrainassa.
    ellauri381.html on line 130: Ukrainian nationalism emerged as an ideology in the first third of the 20th century and bears a close resemblance to German Nazism and a number of other far-right ideologies of the time. This is attested to by its extreme intolerance, its craving for immediate political action, violence, and the denial of rights to minorities.
    ellauri381.html on line 139: During the Second World War, the OUN’s militant wing, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), led by Bandera and his right-hand man Roman Shukhevych, mainly operated in Western Ukraine. It was during this era that some of the most controversial pages in the history of Ukrainian nationalism were written.
    ellauri381.html on line 141: The Banderovites had a complicated relationship with the German occupying forces, but their actions were always determined by the fact that their main enemy was the USSR. This approach was driven by the ideology of Ukrainian nationalism, according to which the main opponent of Ukrainians are “Moskali” (Muscovites) - that is, Russians, as well as Poles and Jews.
    ellauri381.html on line 153: There were notorious anti-Jewish pogroms in western Ukraine in 1941, as well as the so-called Volyn massacre 1943-1944, during which, according to Polish historians, about 150,000 citizens of Polish ethnicity were murdered. Russian and Ukrainians who disagreed with the views of Ukrainian nationalists were also subjected to terror.
    ellauri381.html on line 160: Both Bandera and Shukhevych were posthumously awarded the title Hero of Ukraine by President Viktor Yushchenko, though in 2010 they were deprived of this title by his successor Viktor Yanukovych.
    ellauri381.html on line 164: In addition to the destruction of the Jews, the Banderovites also exterminated Poles and other nationalities, including Russians. Polish historians claim about 150,000 Ukrainian inhabitants of Polish ethnicity were killed during the course of the so-called Volyn massacre of 1943-44. Moreover, Banderovite terror was also turned upon Ukrainians themselves who disagreed with the ideology of Ukrainian nationalism.
    ellauri381.html on line 166: Post-Soviet southeastern Ukraine differed from the west of the country all these years in that it did not have its own identity or national identity. This resulted in quite a sad circumstance, given that even when representatives of the southeast were in power in Kiev, the whole humanitarian sphere of politics was left in the hands of Ukrainian nationalists from Galicia.
    ellauri381.html on line 170: Therefore, a new generation of Ukrainian children learned from textbooks that propounded an ultra -nationalist view of Ukrainian history. Regularly broadcast TV programs promoted Ukrainian radical nationalist propaganda.
    ellauri381.html on line 172: Today, Ukraine is reaping the fruits of this school of education and information, as many of the people pushing the “Ukrainian” agenda are under 30 years old, even though their parents do not emphasize any pronounced Ukrainian identity.
    ellauri381.html on line 177: wwii Russian history Russia-Ukraine relations Soviet Union nationalism Society WWII Ukraine
    ellauri381.html on line 441: Syytteen mukaan vuodesta 1940 Solženitsyn harjoitti neuvostovastaista agitaatiota ja ryhtyi toimiin neuvostovastaisen järjestön luomiseksi. A.I. Solženitsyn väitti, että hänen syytöksensä perustui vain kirjeenvaihtoon N.D. Vitkevichin kanssa ja korosti erityisesti, että häntä syytettiin vain yhdestä pykälästä, vittuilusta Stalinille. Kuuluisa erityiskokous kuitenkin sivuutti artiklan 58-2, ei halunnut soveltaa RSFSR:n rikoslain 49 artiklaa (off with his head) ja pelasti näin Aleksanteri Isaevitšin hengen, jotta hänellä olisi mahdollisuus myöhemmin kuvata häikäilemättömyyttään lukuisissa niteissä.
    ellauri381.html on line 447: While serving as a captain in the Red Army during World War II, Solzhenitsyn was arrested by SMERSH and sentenced to eight years in the Gulag and then internal exile for criticizing Soviet leader Joseph Stalin in a private letter. As a result of his experience in prison and the camps, he gradually became a philosophically minded Eastern Orthodox Christian. Just what happened to Dostojevski during his internation.
    ellauri381.html on line 449: As a result of the Khrushchev Thaw, Solzhenitsyn was released and exonerated. He pursued writing novels about repression in the Soviet Union and his experiences. He published his first novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich in 1962, with approval from Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, which was an account of Stalinist repressions. Actually, it was about a normal day in a labor camp. Following the removal of Khrushchev from power, the Soviet authorities attempted to discourage Solzhenitsyn from writing any more anticommunist crap. He went on anyway, sending the crap to the west. In 1974, Solzhenitsyn was stripped of his Soviet citizenship and flown to West Germany. In 1976, he moved with his family to the United States, where he continued to write. In 1990, shortly before the dissolution of the Soviet Union, his citizenship was restored, and four years later he returned to Russia, where he remained until his death in 2008.
    ellauri381.html on line 493: Pian hänet lähetettiin uuteen "sharashkaan", joka tuolloin siirrettiin Noginskista Marfinoon (silloin Moskovan esikaupunki, nykyinen Ostankino) ja sijoitettiin tänne entisen teologisen seminaarin rakennukseen: "...heidän sanat 'objekti numero 8' tai 'erityinen vankila nro 16'." Joten 9. heinäkuuta A.I. Solzhenitsyn löysi itsensä jälleen pääkaupungista. (Tähän päivään mennessä meillä ei ole täydellistä tietoa kaikista Solženitsynin liikkeistä vankina, kirjoittaa historioitsija A. Ostrovski).
    ellauri381.html on line 541: Tämän jakson tarkastelun päätteeksi A.I. Solženitsyn, kirjoittaa historioitsija A. Ostrovski, näyttää tarpeelliselta kiinnittää huomiota kolmeen tosiasiaan.
    ellauri381.html on line 573: "No, minä", huomautti A.I. Solženitsyn, joka puhui 22. syyskuuta 1967 Neuvostoliiton kirjailijaliiton hallituksen sihteeristön kokouksessa, antoi tarinan suurille onkologeille tarkastettavaksi - he tunnustivat sen lääketieteellisestä näkökulmasta moitteettomaksi ja nykyaikaiseksi. Tämä on juuri syöpää, syöpä sellaisenaan. A historioitsija A. Ostrovski kääntyi osana Solženitsynin elämää koskevaa tutkimusta myöhemmin erään onkologin puoleen, joka kertoi tutustuneensa "syöpäosastoon" silloin kun se meni Samizdatiin, mutta ei voinut lukea sitä loppuun juuri siksi, että lääketieteellisestä näkökulmasta taudin kulku ja hoitoprosessi on kuvattu täysin epäpätevästi.
    ellauri381.html on line 585: Ignat Solzhenitsyn is adamant that his father’s withdrawal from the public sphere was a reaction to the suffering and paranoia he had encountered in the Soviet Union, and the need to write about these experiences. It was not a disapproval of his host country that drove him to hide behind barbed wire fences in the Vermont woods.
    ellauri381.html on line 587: In David Remnick’s profile of the writer in The New Yorker, Solzhenitsyn is quoted as saying, “Purely for my work, the 18 years in Vermont have been the happiest of my life.” His other son, Yermolai Solzhenitsyn, adds, “You should know that it wasn’t like my father was some kind of anti-Western ogre at home.” The younger Solzhenitsyns’ recollections of their American childhoods reveal a father who sent his sons to local schools, encouraged them to learn English, let them listen to music he detested – like Black Sabbath – and generally allowed them the freedom to assimilate with their peers.
    ellauri381.html on line 589: Sanya's Red wheels were not translated to English until 2015. This happened thanks to the creation of the Solzhenitsyn Initiative by the Wilson Center’s Kennan Institute. Funded primarily by sperm donor Drew in Cuff, managing director of Secular Cum, the initiative was an attempt to help illuminate the writer’s fancy legwork.
    ellauri381.html on line 591: It will produce the first ever English translations of the author’s autobiography, “The Little Grain,” and the remaining volumes of his opus, “The Red Wheel.” According to Joseph Dresen of the Kennan Institute, the first translations will be completed in late 2015.
    ellauri381.html on line 593: For much of the late 1970s and 1980s, Solzhenitsyn was portrayed in the Western media as a cranky has-been. "Partly it was his fault,” Ignat answers. “His strident political tone was not compatible with typical Western discourse. Then people saw the beard and, well, two plus two equals Old Testament prophet. But that was a result of the urgency of the times he was living in. People did not understand the world he had come from. Where he came from good manners were not a common currency.”
    ellauri381.html on line 595: Solzhenitsyn’s 1978 Harvard University commencement address is the perfect example of the disconnect between his uncompromising attitude and the expectations of his audience. In keeping with his dissident roots, the author spoke vehemently – through a translator – against what he saw as the shortcomings of the Western world.
    ellauri381.html on line 597: Solzhenitsyn shocked his audience with a speech that strongly criticized his host country rather than expressing his eternal gratitude for escaping a totalitarian government: “The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately, in each country, each government, each political party, and of course in the United Nations. Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and the intellectual elite, causing an impression of loss of courage by the entire society.”
    ellauri381.html on line 606: Ukrainan asiakielimies Taras Kremlin totesi, että sellaiset "venäjänkieliset" nimet kuten Severodonetsk, Arbuzinka, Juzhnoukrainsk, Juzhnoye, Nadezhdovka ja Luch olisi muutettava ja joidenkin siirtokuntien pitäisi saada "historialliset nimensä". Viime aikoina Ukrainan viranomaiset ovat alkaneet taistella paitsi Neuvostoliiton historiaa vastaan, myös kaikkea Venäjään liittyvää vastaan. Sama ilmiö kuin koirilla joiden on pakko kusaista edellisen koiran kusipaikalle.
    ellauri381.html on line 611: Bulgaari Traitor Kostov johti poliittisia murhia ensimmäisinä kuukausina 1944 kommarivallankaappauksen jälkeen ns Kansan tuomioistuimessa. Kostov kantaa suurta syyllisyyttä tuhansien viattomien bulgarialaisten murhista välittömästi 9. syyskuuta 1944 jälkeen. Hän hyväksyi ne ja jopa sanktioi ne. 20. tammikuuta 1945 BRP:n keskuskomitean PB: n kokouksessa, jossa keskusteltiin kansanoikeuden tuomioista, Kostov vaati kuolemantuomioiden enimmäismäärää.
    ellauri381.html on line 628: Relations between the U.S. and Bulgaria had gone from merely chilly to bitterly cold. In Sofia, U.S. Minister Donald Heath was harassed and insulted by Bulgarian officials. They demanded his recall. When Washington protested, it got only smiling evasions from Bulgarian Chargé d'Affaires Peter Voutov in Washington, sullen silence from Sofia. Last week, his patience exhausted, Secretary of State Dean Acheson broke off diplomatic relations with Russia's Balkan satellite (which was a Nazi satellite before that).
    ellauri381.html on line 632: Following his expulsion from Bulgaria, Heath was posted as the first U.S. Ambassador to the newly independent countries in Indochina including Laos (1950–1954), Cambodia (1950–1954), and South Vietnam (1950–1954). During these concurrent postings he was resident in Saigon. Heath supported the Domino Theory and wrote that if the French pulled out "Only a blind hen could doubt the immediate Communist engulfment of Southeast Asia."
    ellauri382.html on line 330: Suomi on edelleen ulkomaille muuttavien venäläisten kiinnostava maa maantieteellisen läheisyytensä, logististen etujensa ja yhteisen historiansa vuoksi, ja Venäjältä Suomeen muuttavien määrä pysyy vakaana. Projektimme on ratkaissut menestyksekkäästi Suomeen maahanmuuttoon ja ulkomaalaisten oleskelulupiin liittyviä ongelmia Suomessa vuodesta 2007 lähtien. Tietoja oleskeluluvasta Suomessa: Oleskelulupien luokat Suomessa Oleskeluluvan jatkaminen Suomessa Kieltäytyminen oleskeluluvan uusimisesta Suomessa Muutoksenhaku oleskeluluvan uusimisesta Suomessa Kieltäytyminen Suomen oleskeluluvan myöntämisestä Pysyvän oleskeluluvan epääminen Suomessa Suomessa oleskelun pituus oleskeluluvalla Muutoksenhaku Suomen oleskeluluvan epäämisestä Sukulaisten yhdistäminen
    ellauri382.html on line 342: Samanlaista roskaväkeä kuin me täällä Quorassakin kirjoittelevat luopiot. Mutta meitä odottaa valitettavasti sama kohtalo historiassa: me kuolemme. Terv. MBA oppilaitoxesta Haaga-Helia ammattikorkeakoulusta, perunanenäinen Viola Mäkinen.
    ellauri382.html on line 362: David Goggins is an American hero and we may never know the true extent of all he has done for our country. He is a Guinness World Record holder and widely regarded as “the baddest man on the planet”. David Goggins (born February 17, 1975) is an American retired United States Navy Seal. He is also an ultramarathon runner, ultra-distance cyclist, triathlete, ultra-motivational speaker, author of two conflicting memoirs, and was abducted into the International Sports Hall of Fame for his achievements in sport. Goggins was also awarded the VFW Americanism award in 2018 for his service in the United States Armed Forces.
    ellauri382.html on line 364: He is former Guinness world record holder for pull ups (4030 in 17 hours). The Guinness World Record for most pull-ups in 24-hours was 4,210, a pretty amazing feat. But, that record was trumped last week by over 100 pull-ups by 54-year old Mark Jordan. Jordan, from Corpus Christi, Texas, cranked out 4,321 pull-ups in 24-hours. He was awarded the World Records certificate last Wednesday after Guinness made it official. Sorry, my bad, Eniten vetoa 24 tunnissa (uros) on 8 940, ja sen saavutti pieni ruipelo Kenta Adachi (Japani) Shunanissa, Yamaguchissa, Japanissa 22.-23. helmikuuta 2024.
    ellauri382.html on line 369: Goggins was born on February 17, 1975, to Trunnis and Jackie Goggins. In 1981, he lived in Williamsville, New York, on a street called Paradise Road (same as Donald Duck!) with his parents and brother, Trunnis Jr. While Goggins's neighborhood held "model citizens consisting of white people," he describes his colorful home experience as "hell on Earth." Goggins's father owned the roller skating rink Skateland, located in East Buffalo, New York. At age six, Goggins often worked the night shift at Skateland alongside his family, lining up roller skates. Goggins’s mother left his father due to abuse and eventually moved herself and her children to live with Goggins's grandparents in Brazil, Indiana. Goggins enrolled in second grade at a small Catholic school and made First and Second Communion but failed the Third. His brother, Trunnis Jr., returned to Buffalo to live with their father.
    ellauri382.html on line 371: When Goggins enrolled in the third grade, he was diagnosed with a learning disability due to the lack of schooling. He also found it difficult to learn as he was suffering from toxic stress because of the child abuse that he suffered during his early years in Buffalo, New York. Because of the stress, he developed a stutter. Goggins explains h-ho-how he was c-co-constantly in a f-fight-or-flight response with social anxiety because of his s-st-stuttering. In school, Goggins was subjected to racism and the K-Ku-Klux Klan held a local presence at the time in Brazil and Indiana. Goggins recalls he once found "Niger [sic] we're gonna kill you" on his Spanish notebook. At 16, a better informed student spray painted "nigger" on the door of Goggins's car.
    ellauri382.html on line 373: Entrepreneur Jesse Itzler, upon seeing Goggins perform at a 24-hour ultramarathon, hired Goggins to live with him in his house for a month. Itzler wrote about his experience on a blog and later published the story as a book Living With A Seal.
    ellauri382.html on line 502: All this happens because:
    ellauri382.html on line 577: Imi has two Master’s degrees and is trained in Jungian theories, philosophical counseling, mentalization-based treatment, solution-focused coaching, trauma-informed practices, and mindfulness-based modalities. She works holistically, combining psychological insights with Eastern and Western philosophies such as Buddhism and Stoicism.
    ellauri382.html on line 588: Gas Light is a 1938 thriller play, set in 1880s London, written by the British novelist and playwright Patrick Hamilton. Hamilton´s play is a dark tale of a marriage based on deceit and trickery, and a husband committed to driving his wife insane in order to steal from her.
    ellauri382.html on line 628: Koulussa olin kömpelö ymmärtämään sosiaalisia vivahteita ja olin jatkuvan kiusaamisen kohteena. Äärimmäisinä aikoina muistan piiloutuneeni wc:hen lounaalle välttääkseni häpeää olla yksin. Kun päästin spontaanimman, editoimattoman, liian innostuneen itseni ulos, muut pitivät minua omituisena, ylimielisenä ja kutsuivat minua "draaman kuningattareksi". Minusta tuli ylipainoinen, mikä heikensi itsetuntoani entisestään ja sai minut tuntemaan oloni muukalaiseksi obeesien maailmassa. Kun olin 12-vuotias, huomasin olevani tyypin 4 Enneagrammi ja INFJ (introvertti, intuitiivinen, tunteva ja tuomitseva persoonallisuus). Nautin kaikesta, mitä sain tietää erityisherkistä ihmisistä, empatiiasta ja indigolapsista. Vaikka etsintäni alkoi siitä yhdestä kipeästä paikasta, tämä parantavien taiteiden keräämis- ja syntetisointiprosessi historian ja maailman halki on ollut innostava matka, enkä vaihtaisi sitä enää mihinkään.
    ellauri382.html on line 754: Serhi Ploh’i (ukr. Сергій Плохій; s. 1957) on ukrainalainen historioitsija, professori ja tietokirjailija. Hänen kirjojensa pääaiheita ovat Ukrainan historia ja kylmä sota. Plokhy kirjoittaa englannixi. Serhii Plokhy is the Mykhailo Hrushevsky Professor of Ukrainian History at Harvard University.
    ellauri382.html on line 756: Serhii Plokhy käy moneen otteeseen läpi Putinin ideologiaan vaikuttaneita venäläisiä ajattelijoita. Heihin kuuluu Venäjän kansalaissodassa valkoisten joukkojen kenraali Anton Denikin, jonka muistelmista Putin vakuuttui. Anton Denikinin toilailuista on paasauxissa paljon mazkua. Suomalaisittain on yllättävää, että Plokhy listaa Putinin vaikuttajiin myös kirjallisuuden nobelistin Alexander Solzhenitsynin. Tämän hän mainitsee ize asiassa useimmin. Eikös Sanjan pitänyt olla länkkärien taskussa? Hän viittaa Solzhenitsynin vuonna 1990 ilmestyneeseen kirjoitukseen, jossa tämä vaati ”Venäjän unionin perustamista”. Siihen kuuluisivat Venäjä, Ukraina, Valko-Venäjä ja Kazakstanin pohjoisosa. Ei-slaavilaisia Neuvostoliiton osia Solzhenitsyn ei kaivannut. Plokhii on ukrainaxi huono. Zekixi Plochy tarkoittaa samaa kuin hepreaxi sharon, eli tasanko. “Serhii Plokhy’s Putin is an unprecedented retelling of a familiar disaster. It is a horror story – of political cynicism and scientific ignorance – from which the world will be saved, if at all, only by heroism and luck.“ He has his mother’s laugh.
    ellauri382.html on line 769: Kiovan Rusin alue oli 1300-luvulta 1600-luvulle pääosin puolalaisen vallan alla. 1654 on tärkeä vuosiluku Ukrainan historiassa, mutta käsitykset sen merkityksestä ovat Venäjällä ja Ukrainassa täysin vastakkaiset. Tuolloin Puolaa vastaan noussut kasakkapäällikkö Bohdan Hmelnytskyi teki liiton Venäjän kanssa Perejaslavin kaupungissa Kiovan lähellä. Plokhyn mukaan Perejaslavin liitto on yksi kulmakivi väitteelle, että vähävenäläiset ovat vähän sellaisia venäläisiä. Neuvostoliittolaisen ja venäläisen historiamytologian mukaan on olemassa vain yksi venäläinen kansakunta, jonka puolalaiset jakoivat ja joka Perejaslavissa yhdistyi uudelleen.
    ellauri382.html on line 776: Yksi Ukrainan kansakunnan rakentajista oli historioitsija Myhailo Hruševskyi, jonka nimeä Plokhyn oppituoli Harvardissa kantaa. Plokhy on kirjoittanut hänestäkin kirjan. Itsenäisyysjulistus annettiin, kun bolševikit kolkuttelivat Kiovan portteja. Ukraina solmi liiton Saksan ja Itävalta-Unkarin kanssa, toimitti niille viljaa ja sai työnnettyä sillä bolševikit pois. Nyze antaa viljaa ja särötyslupia lännelle ja saa sillä työnnettyä slobot pois. Jos saa. Koska kaikki tavoittelevat Ukrainaa, koska se on maailman vilja-aitta, se aina häviää. Viimexi alue jaettiin uudestaan Neuvosto-Venäjän, Puolan, Tšekkoslovakian ja Romanian kesken. Ukraina haluaa, että holodomor tunnustetaan kansainvälisesti ukrainalaisten kansanmurhaksi. Vastarintajohtajista on myyttisiin mittasuhteisiin nostettu yksi mies, Stepan Bandera, josta eivät edes nazit pitäneet.
    ellauri382.html on line 782: Mikä sodassa on yllättänyt Plokhyn? Hän miettii hetken ja vastaa, että sodan raakuus. ”Ajattelen, että jos pitää ihmisiä osana omaa kansaa, miten voi selittää, että sotii näin?” Mitä vittua, ainahan on kansalaissodat olleet raaimmasta päästä. Plokhoj historik!
    ellauri383.html on line 43: In Ancient Rome, the punishment for killing one's own father was the death penalty. It involved being sewn into a leather sack along with a variety of vicious animals, such as a chicken, a snake, a monkey, or a dog. Then, having reached the banks of the Tiber, he was thrown into the icy waters of the river. This execution method was called “Poena cullei" (Latin, 'penalty of the sack').
    ellauri383.html on line 55: This 98-year-old woman walked 10 km with a cane to bring this splinter of wood to the Ukrainian-controlled territory from the settlement of Ocheretyne in Donetsk region, captured by Russia last week. Because she didn’t want to leave a perfectly good splinter to the Russian occupiers.
    ellauri383.html on line 79: Tässä ei juurikaan painoteta tarinankerrontaa. Variety-arvostelu väitti, että "käsikirjoittaja-ohjaaja Fehér vaatii kieltämään yleisöltä kaiken tyytyväisyyden, keskittyen yksinomaan pakkomielteeseen ja kieltäytyy esittämästä mitään todisteita, jotka johtaisivat tapausta eteenpäin." Arvostelija ehdotti myös, että siitä tulisi täydellinen albumi taiteellisista mustavalkoisista still-kuvista. Siellä ei selvästi yritettykään ymmärtää, mitä Fehér aikoi. “I want to show to what extent the search for justice stands in ridiculous contrast to the eternity of nature. Meanwhile, it is precisely this futile search that I am so fascinated by,” György Fehér said in 1991. Magyar Fehér Bor.
    ellauri383.html on line 113: Länsi-saksalaiset kohtelivat meitä maahanmuuttajina, varsinkin 90-luvulla, ja meidän oli itse asiassa kyykistyttävä kaikkiin pätevyysvaatimuxiin ja lykkäyksiin aivan kuten siirtolaistenkin. Monet itäsaksalaiset tuntevat edelleen, että eliitti kohtelee heitä maahanmuuttajina. Historia on voittajien kirjoittama. Länsi-eliitti tuntee olevansa historian voittaja.
    ellauri383.html on line 115: On outoa, kun noin nuori yrittää käsitellä historiaa. Vietin lapsuuteni ja nuoruuteni idän maaseudulla. Etuovia ei tarvinnut edes lukita yöksi. Lapsena sai liikkua vapaasti ulkona, eikä vanhempien tarvinnut huolehtia siitä, että mitään tapahtuisi. Natsimenneisyyttä on varmasti käsitelty paremmin lännessä. Siellä vanhat natsit pystyivät nopeasti tekemään uran uudelleen joka alalla. Vaikka Drehbuchverfassereina.
    ellauri383.html on line 247: In representing Mr Ihor Kolomoisky, I express my deep concern about the trials I witnessed during the hearings held in the Ukrainian courts in Kyiv in February 2024. Mr Kolomoisky has been unjustly detained in a Kyiv prison for over six months (and now his arrest has been extended for another 60 days!) as a mere suspect, and this situation raises concerns about respect for human rights and due process of law in Ukrainian courts.
    ellauri383.html on line 249: I have been asked to provide my opinion on a request to extend the detention of Mr Ihor Kolomoisky, who has been in custody for six months on suspicion of various economic crimes for the needs of the investigation, without a decision on charges,due to the lack of a sufficient evidentiary basis for such a decision at this time. The investigation is ongoing and Mr Kolomoisky has been in custody for over six months, with no end to his detention in sight in the near future. On the contrary, the prosecution has recently requested at least an additional 6 months (!) to continue the investigation, and no one can predict how long it will last and when it will end. All this time, the prosecution has been insisting that Mr Kolomoisky remain in prison. I'm sorry, but this makes no sense.
    ellauri383.html on line 255: Businessman Ihor Kolomoisky plans to live in Ukraine in the next five years (2019-2024). Until recently, he lived in Israel, where he moved from Switzerland. The last time he was in Ukraine was June 2017. "I've decided to live in Ukraine for the next five years. For I hope for the rule of law in the country," he told the investigative TV program Schemes program of the Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. Kolomoisky denies that his stay in Ukraine is connected with the 2019 election of Volodymyr Zelensky as president. "It has nothing to do with that. I've come here and plan to be here for family reasons. My son is to ink a contract with a basketball club of Ukraine," he said.
    ellauri383.html on line 259: "They will take on the responsibility for handling certain issues. For example, Victor [Mr. Pinchuk] will provide 24 families of our captured sailors with apartments and continue solving issues of social assistance for all military personnel. This is our agreement," Zelensky said at a meeting with business representatives in Kyiv on June 20, according to the TV news service TSN.
    ellauri383.html on line 282: Orion löytyy Eridanusjoen vierestä kahden metsästyskoiran Cane Majorin ja Cane Minoren kanssa taistelemassa Härkää vastaan. Toinen sen saaliista, jänis, löytyy myös lähistöltä.
    ellauri383.html on line 290: Amos 5:8 ESV / 178 helpful votes. He who made the Pleiades and Orion, and turns deep darkness into the morning and darkens the day into night, who calls for the waters of the sea and pours them out on the surface of the earth, the Lord is his name;
    ellauri383.html on line 317: Lift up your eyes on high and see: who created these? He who brings out their host by number, calling them all by name; by the greatness of his might and because he is strong in power, not one is missing.
    ellauri383.html on line 332: Then Job answered and said: “Truly I know that it is so: But how can a man be in the right before God? If one wished to contend with him, one could not answer him once in a thousand times. He is wise in heart and mighty in strength —who has hardened himself against him, and succeeded?— he who removes mountains, and they know it not, when he overturns them in his anger,...
    ellauri383.html on line 335: To the choirmaster. A Psalm of David. The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork. Day to day pours out speech, and night to night reveals knowledge. There is no speech, nor are there words, whose voice is not heard. Their voice goes out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them he has set a tent for the sun, which comes out like a bridegroom leaving his chamber, and, like a strong man, runs its course with joy....
    ellauri383.html on line 344: And lusted after her lovers there, whose members were like those of donkeys, and whose issue was like that of horses. (Now this was helpful!)
    ellauri383.html on line 347: Hear this word that I take up over you in lamentation, O house of Israel: “Fallen, no more to rise, is the virgin Israel; forsaken on her land, with none to raise her up.” For thus says the Lord God: “The city that went out a thousand shall have a hundred left, and that which went out a hundred shall have ten left to the house of Israel.” For thus says the Lord to the house of Israel: “Seek me and live; but do not seek Bethel, and do not enter into Gilgal or cross over to Beersheba; for Gilgal shall surely go into exile, and Bethel shall come to nothing.”...
    ellauri383.html on line 359: You are wearied with your many counsels; let them stand forth and save you, those who divide the heavens, who gaze at the stars, who at the new moons make known what shall come upon you. Behold, they are like stubble; the fire consumes them; they cannot deliver themselves from the power of the flame. No coal for warming oneself is this, no fire to sit before!
    ellauri383.html on line 371: For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
    ellauri383.html on line 374: To him who made the great lights, for his steadfast love endures forever; the sun to rule over the day, for his steadfast love endures forever; the moon and stars to rule over the night, for his steadfast love endures forever;
    ellauri383.html on line 377: This is the day that the Lord has made; let us rejoice and be glad in it.
    ellauri383.html on line 383: And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars. She was pregnant and was crying out in birth pains and the agony of giving birth. And another sign appeared in heaven: behold, a great red dragon, with seven heads and ten horns, and on his heads seven diadems. His tail swept down a third of the stars of heaven and cast them to the earth. And the dragon stood before the woman who was about to give birth, so that when she bore her child he might devour it. She gave birth to a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught up to God and to his throne,...
    ellauri383.html on line 392: But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty. For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people....
    ellauri383.html on line 398: The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, who bore witness to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw. Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written in it, for the time is near. John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace from him who is and who was and who is to come, and from the seven spirits who are before his throne, and from Jesus Christ the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of kings on earth. To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood...
    ellauri383.html on line 410: On the third day there was a wedding at Cana in Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. Jesus also was invited to the wedding with his disciples. When the wine ran out, the mother of Jesus said to him, “They have no wine.” And Jesus said to her, “Woman, what does this have to do with me? My hour has not yet come.” His mother said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.”...
    ellauri383.html on line 428: For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison,
    ellauri383.html on line 449: But Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
    ellauri383.html on line 458: But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.
    ellauri383.html on line 461: Saying, “Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him.”
    ellauri383.html on line 473: Orion on tähtikuvioista kirkkain, ominaisuus, joka sopii hyvin hahmolle, joka legendan mukaan oli miehistä vaikuttavin ja kaunein. Tähdistöä korostavat kirkkaat tähdet Betelgeuse ja Rigel, ja siinä on kolme selkeästi linjattua tähteä, jotka muodostavat Orionin vyön. "Mikään muu tähdistö ei edusta miehen hahmoa selvemmin", sanoo Germanicus Caesar.
    ellauri383.html on line 493: Hyvin erilainen tarina, jonka myös Hyginus kertoi, on se, että Artemis rakasti Orionia ja harkitsi vakavasti siveyden lupauksensa luopumista mennäkseen naimisiin hänen kanssaan. Suurimpana mies- ja naarasmetsästäjinä he olisivat muodostaneet mahtavan parin. Mutta Apollo, Artemiksen kaksoisveli, ei pitänyt parisuhteesta. Eräänä päivänä Orionin uidessa aamu-uintia Apollo teeskenteli haluavansa testata Artemiksen jousiammuntataitoja ja haastoi tämän osumaan pieneen mustaan pisteeseen taulun yläreunassa, joka kellui aalloissa. Artemis lävisti hänet ensimmäisellä iskulla ja kauhistui huomatessaan, että hän oli tappanut Orionin. Hämmentyneenä hiän asetti hänet tähtikuvioiden joukkoon.
    ellauri383.html on line 517: Lotsa people in Trininad used to hear The Voice of God, V.S. Naipaul tells. One of them even let himself be tied to a balsa Cross but got pissed when people began to throw at him largish stones. Ei jumalauta nyt loppu hei! Laama sabakhthaani! In the previous Gem I opened up the topic of hearing God’s Voice and I gave you the list of guys to whom God had spoken to in our Jakarta and Sysmä based Cell Groups over the years. But how do I know whether It Is God or me? Realize there are times when God Himself breaks the rules. He does that. He is not at all a God who is stuck in his own silly old rules! That is when we may well grasp the wrong end of His humongous stick. That could spell the end of our intimacy with His nugget...
    ellauri383.html on line 586: "Itse seksityötä käsittelevään kansalaisaloitteeseen paneudun, mikäli se aikanaan saa tarvittavan määrän allekirjoituksia edetäkseen eduskuntakäsittelyyn. Ensisijaisesti en näe tarvetta rinnastaa seksityötä muihin elinkeinoihin. Keskustanuoret on itsenäinen ja rohkea toimija, niin sen pitääkin olla. Virheistä ei pidä lannistua, vaan oppia. Puolue tarvitsee nuoria, uuden sukupuolen tekijöitä. Nuorten elimillä alkaa olla keinot vähissä."
    ellauri383.html on line 612: Niinisalon harjoituskentällä maan lounaisosassa järjestetään 26.huhtikuuta-14. toukokuuta sotilaspelit "Arrow-24" (Arrow 24). Niihin osallistuu 2 600 suomalaista sotilasta ja noin 500 kalustoa. Ah-64e Apache-taisteluhelikoptereita saapui Albionista, cv9035-panssariajoneuvoja Virosta, Scimitar-rynnäkköpanssarivaunuja ja Spartan-panssaroituja miehistönkuljetusvaunuja Latviasta. Baltian liittoutuneet lähettivät yhteensä jopa 300 "soldaten". He harjoittelevat hyökkääviä operaatioita ja myös hyvin koordinoitua vuorovaikutusta.
    ellauri384.html on line 197: Ostin Tammiston Kontista Hellerin kovakantisen Kuvittele tätä (Picture this). Se tarkastelee satiirin varjolla ihmisen olemassaolon perusdikotomioita. Teos hyppää Ateenan kulta-ajalta 1600 -luvun Hollantiin ja Amerikan valtakunnan nousuun; hyppäämällä Aristotelesta Rembrandtiin, Sokrateen ja takaisin Helleriin ja jopa Jimmy Carteriin. Niitä (paizi Jimmyä) yhdistää yksi maalaus: Rembrandt van Rijnin Aristoteles miettimässä Homeroksen rintakuvaa. Sen on jenkit ryövänneet Uuden Amsterdamin Metropolitan-museoon.
    ellauri384.html on line 201: Tieteellis-teollinen vallankumous oli hyvässä vauhdissa 1650-luvulla, mikä teki Rembrandtin mietiskelyteemasta suhteellisen trendaavan aiheen. Maalaus muodostaa keskeisen teeman Joseph Hellerin vuoden 1988 romaanissa Picture This. Se tutkii Rembrandtin näkemystä yhteiskunnasta hänen pohtiessaan rahan arvoa.
    ellauri384.html on line 203: Heller päättelee, että emme opi historiasta enempää kuin persut (ja itse asiassa niin suuri osa historiasta voi olla faktatonta, että oppiminen voi olla mahdotonta). "Amerikkalaisen vuosisadan" pessimistisenä kroonikkokirjoittajana hänen pääteemansa on luonnollisesti yhtäläisyydet entisen kreikkalaisen herran eli merien entisen hallitsijan ja hänen kotimaansa välillä.
    ellauri384.html on line 218: The ski resort of Sallbach is a traditional Austrian village with beautiful views. ... The lifts from Sallbach are very good mainly chairs and gondolas. Excellent stay in Sallbach(er hof). Review of Saalbacher Hof. Reviewed Aug 1, 2014. Everything was great. Just one elementary thing we suggest one can improve: The soap dispensors in the bathroom and WC are very difficult to get soap out of. One must nearly be a bodybuilder to be able to squeeze soap liquid out of them. Hope this is fixed till next time qwe come becuse we are sure to be back. Very nice rooms, friendly staff, excellent food and nice facilities. Lovely harp music. --- Aber im Moplach. Homber, Bodenart form Rommelsberge Vor dem Rommelsberg! Bockelswiesen die Bückelswiesen! Brern Wissen Breite Wiesen. Besenrren, grappig lachertje mop lach streek stunt. Brrm. Grrrrrh. 'Leuk mop.' Lach ik. Хорошая шутка. я смеюсь.
    ellauri384.html on line 222: “Heaven” itself is a rather bizarre concept. Mark Twain underscored the lunacy of the idea in his short story “Captain Stormfield’s Visit To Heaven.” In that story and in “Letters From The Earth” he muses about how humans have invented a place which is full of things that they never engaged in or cared about while on earth, and yet imagine themselves enjoying for all eternity. How many harp enthusiasts do YOU know personally? How many millenia would you enjoy singing the same song of praise over and over? How long would you delight in praying to the glory of God 24 hours a day? If you don’t do that now, why do you think you’re going to enjoy it when you’re dead?
    ellauri384.html on line 224: he has imagined a heaven, and has left entirely out of it the supremest of all his delights, the one ecstasy that stands first and foremost in the heart of every individual of his race -- and of ours -- sexual intercourse!
    ellauri384.html on line 253: Kreikan seitsemän viisasta olivat julkkixina hyvin tunnettuja sekä toisilleen että suurelle yleisölle. Anacharsis, joka oli yksi näistä viisaista miehistä, tuli käymään Solonissa Ateenassa. Kun Anacharsis näki Ateenan demokratian toiminnan, hän huomautti, että oli outoa, että Ateenassa viisaat puhuivat ja tyhmät päättivät. Solon ihaili tämän miehen valmisnokkeluutta ja hän viihdytti Anacharsisia vieraana pitkään. Solon näytti Anacharsikselle joitain lakeja, joita hän laati ateenalaisille. Anacharsis nauroi Solonille, koska hän kuvitteli, että ateenalaisten epärehellisyys ja ahneus voitaisiin rajoittaa kirjoitetuilla laeilla. Sellaiset lait, sanoi Anacharsis, ovat kuin hämähäkinverkkoja: ne saavat kiinni heikot ja köyhät, mutta rikkaat voivat repiä niiden läpi.
    ellauri384.html on line 262: Ateenalaiset ja megaralaiset olivat taistelleet pitkään salamimakkarasta. Ateenalaiset kyllästyivät sotaan ja hyväksyivät lain, jonka mukaan jokainen, joka halusi salamia, kuolisi. Solon näki, että suurin osa nuorista miehistä halusi salamimakkaraa, mutta pelkäsivät puhua ääneen tämän lain takia.
    ellauri384.html on line 276: Toisin kuin Lycurgus, Solon ei voinut muuttaa tilaa ylhäältä alas, joten hän työskenteli vain siinä, mitä oli mahdollista parantaa ilman täydellistä vallankumousta. Hän yritti vain yrittää saada ateenalaiset hyväksymään sen, pienellä pakotuksella. Aina kun mahdollista, Solon käytti eufemismeja, kuten kutsui veroja "maksuiksi". Vizi historian ensimmäinen talousliberaali! Hän onnistui saavuttamaan jonkin verran menestystä järkevällä sekoituxella makeaa hapanta ja oikeudenmukaisuutta voimalla. Kun Solonilta myöhemmin kysyttiin, oliko hän laatinut parhaat mahdolliset lait ateenalaisille, hän vastasi: "Paras, jonka he pystyivät vastaanottamaan."
    ellauri384.html on line 352: Ihannetapauksessa varsinkin ne, jotka tekevät palkkatyötä, suljetaan poliisien jäsenyydestä, sillä Aristoteles näkee vapaa-ajan välttämättömäxi osallistumiseen sekä poliittiseen yhteenliittymään että korkeimpaan hyvään. Samoin ulkomaalaiset jätetään ulkopuolelle, ja Aristoteles huomauttaa, että vain kaupungit, joissa on pulaa hyvistä työmiehistä, hyväksyvät ulkomaalaisia kansalaisiksi.
    ellauri384.html on line 366: Koska Aristoteles katsoo, että ihannevaltio koostuu vapaa-ajan miehistä, voimme edelleen määritellä tyrannian hallitukseksi, joka pyrkii horjuttamaan tai nujuuttamaan vapaiden miesten auktoriteettia ja alentamaan heidät omassa poliisikunnassaan olennaisesti naisten asemaan ja asentoihin. Kullin orjuuteen.
    ellauri384.html on line 370: Yksi tärkeimmistä menetelmistä, jonka Aristoteles pitää Korintin Perianterin ansioksi, on sellaisten pätevien miesten poistaminen, jotka voivat uhata tyrannin asemaa. Thrasybuloxen pitkät viljantähkät ja Australian tall poppy syndrome. In Australia and New Zealand, tall poppy syndrome refers to successful people being criticised. This occurs when their peers believe they are too successful, or are bragging about their success. Intense scrutiny and criticism of such a person is termed as "cutting down the tall poppy". It has been described as being the by-product of the Australian and New Zealand nasty cultural value of egalitarianism. Kristina-tädin paukuttama Janteloven palaa mieleen (kz. albumia 16.)
    ellauri384.html on line 387: The real Lenny Bruce was accused of using the Yiddish word “shmuck,” taken as an obscenity to mean “penis.” He incorporated the charge into his standup, explaining that the colloquial Jewish meaning of “schmuck” was “fool”, not "schlong" (meisseli). Driven to pennilessness by relentless prosecution, police harassment and blacklisting from most clubs across the country, he died of a morphine overdose in 1966 at 40 years old.
    ellauri384.html on line 453: Childs on erityisen tunnettu kanonisen lähestymistavan edelläkävijänä, tapana tulkita Raamattua, joka keskittyy itse raamatullisen kaanonin tekstiin valmiina tuotteena, ihan sama miten se on syntynyt. Itse asiassa Childs ei pitänyt termistä, koska hän uskoi hänen työnsä edustavan täysin uutta lähtökohtaa, joka korvasi koko historiallis-kriittisen menetelmän. Lasten vaikutteita olivat muun muassa Karl Barth ja Hermann Gunkel.
    ellauri384.html on line 455: Vika oli siinä että historiallinen kritiikki "poisti tarkoituksella Raamatun uskonnolliset väitteet alistaakseen sen analysoitavaksi ikään kuin se olisi vasta löydetty asiakirja." Ei näin! Raamattu on luettava pirun lailla "elävän uskon välineenä".
    ellauri386.html on line 41: In the year of Dostoevsky's death (1881) Anna Snitkova turned 35 years old. She never remarried. In the remaining time (37 years) she collected his manuscripts, letters, documents and photographs. In 1906 she created a room dedicated to Fyodor Dostoevsky in the State Historical Museum.
    ellauri386.html on line 101: Miltopaeus julkaisi laajan puhetaidon oppaan Institutiones oratoriae sekä latinan kielen kieliopin Synopsis grammaticae latinae. Häntä pidettiin taitavana ja valistuneena opettajana, joskin hänen aikalaisensa teologian professori Petrus Bång oli kiivaasti eri mieltä Miltopaeuksen kanssa ja varoitti ylioppilaita hänen "viettelevästä filosofiastaan ja turhista jaarituksistaan."
    ellauri386.html on line 153: Kun Anna kirjoitti muistelmiaan elämästään Dostojevskin kanssa, hän häivytti izensä taustalle. Anna halusi vakuuttaa maailman miehensä neroudesta ja onnistui luomaan tämän irvikuvan niin hyvin, että ihmiset eivät ymmärtäneet hänen rooliaan. Anna ei ollut riistetty pikkuvaimo vaan uurasti päättäväisesti aviomiehensä perinnön luomisessa ja sai suuren tyytyväisyyden vauraasta bisneksestä jääden samalla näkymättömäxi. "Hän oli oman menestyksensä teppo", Kaufman sanoi. Sen lisäksi, että hän nousi ensimmäisenä naispuolisena kustantajana ja kehitti yhden Venäjän historian ensimmäisistä kirjojen jakeluyhtiöistä, hän perusti Dostojevskin nimiin sairaaloita ja kouluja sekä talonpoikakoulun, joka valmistui tuhat tyttöä; loi Venäjän ensimmäisen kirjallisuuden museon; ja julkaisi Dostojevskin kokonaiset kokoelmateokset, joita levitettiin kolmekymmentä vuotta hänen kuolemansa jälkeen ja piti huolen että hänen miesvainajansa pysyi venäläisen kulttuurin eturintamassa.
    ellauri386.html on line 216: his_Bier%2C_Kramskoy.jpg/340px-Dostoyevsky_on_his_Bier%2C_Kramskoy.jpg" />
    ellauri386.html on line 392: Where we are dressed for this short comedy.

    ellauri386.html on line 400: Analysis (ai): This poem explores the transient nature of human life through a theatrical metaphor. It compares life to a play, with our passions as the driving force and our time on Earth as the brief performance. The poem suggests that Heaven observes our actions and judgments, drawing attention to the consequences of our deeds. It concludes that while life's performance may be playful, our ultimate demise is a serious reality, underscoring the fragility and brevity of existence.
    ellauri386.html on line 402: In comparison to the author's other works, this poem shares a similar preoccupation with mortality and the transience of human life. However, it departs from some of his more introspective and personal poems by adopting a more detached and philosophical tone.
    ellauri386.html on line 441: When I got back I did some research. Much of this I already knew, but: There are very few additives in food in Europe. Chemicals and pesticides are much more regulated, many of those approved in the US have a high level of carcinogens or other other disease inducing components. Fresh food does not need fat, sugar, salt, etc added for taste. I am now giving serious thought to moving to Europe. I suspect I will live a bit longer if I do, and I KNOW my quality of life will be greatly improved.
    ellauri386.html on line 452: - Okei, hän kirjoitti runoutta - en ollut tietoinen siitä. Epäilen, että monet ihmiset ovat. Häntä ei todellakaan pidetä merkittävänä henkilönä historiassa runoutensa vuoksi. Walter Scott taas tunnetaan runoilijana myös niille meistä, jotka eivät tiedä runoudesta mitään.
    ellauri386.html on line 454: On 29 October 1618, explorer and adventurer Sir Walter Raleigh was beheaded at the Palace of Westminster, on the orders of King James I. Accused of deliberately inciting war between England and Spain during one of his expeditions. On the day of his execution he was reported to have been suffering from from ague, or fever.
    ellauri386.html on line 456: He was allowed to examine the executioner's axe, musing: "This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries". His last words were later uttered to the hesitant executioner: "What dost thou fear? Strike, man, strike!"
    ellauri386.html on line 531: Rosenthal on ollut näkyvästi yhteydessä heprealaiseen kirjallisuuteen ja Haskalah- liikkeen kehitykseen Venäjällä. Se oli sen ja Vladin yhteinen harraste. Vuonna 1894 Rosenthal perusti Ohole Shem -seuran , jonka puheenjohtajana hän toimi. Ohole Shem Association ( hepreaksi : אגודת אהלי שם ) oli amerikkalainen järjestö , joka edistää ja vaalii heprean ja muiden seemiläisten kielten opiskelua sekä juutalaisen historian ja kirjallisuuden tutkimusta.
    ellauri386.html on line 573: Euroopassa 1900-luvulla käytyjen kahden suursodan jälkeisen historian valossa Dostojevskin ja Solovjovin pahimmat pelot näyttäisivät toteutuneen, sillä ei ole nähty ortodoksisen maailmankirkon syntyvän ja laajenevan Venäjältä Eurooppaan, vaan jotakin aivan muuta. Eurooppa on puolessa vuosisadassa yhdistynyt Euroopan unioniksi, jättänyt Venäjän ulkopuolelleen ja asteittain laajentunut painaen Venäjää kohti Aasiaa, minne niin monet eurooppalaiset kautta vuosisatojen ovat katsoneet Venäjän kuuluvankin. Kuva Dostojevskin ja Solovjovin painajaisesta täydentyy, kun muistetaan, miten Euroopan yhdentyminen on käynnistynyt. Yksi tärkeä aatteellis-poliittinen sysäys yhdentymiseen lähti roomalaiskatolisesta valtiomieskolmikosta Rober Schuman (Ranskan pääministeri ja ulkoministeri vuosina 1947-1952), Alcide de Gasperi (Italian pääministeri vuosina 1945-1953) ja Konrad Adenauer (Länsi-Saksan liittokansleri vuosina 1949-1963). Näiden kolmen paskakasan yhteistyön perustana oli heille yhteinen kristillisdemokraattinen puoluetausta ja saksan kieli. Sen lisäksi tähän Euroopan yhdentymiskehitykseen ovat merkittävästi vaikuttaneet sodanjälkeiset aatteet ja politiikka Venäjällä. Sosialistisesta Neuvostoliitosta Eurooppa sai yhteisen vihollisen, jonka luoma uhka oli omiaan lähentämään eurooppalaisia valtioita toisiinsa ja tasoittamaan niiden kansallisia tunteita ja eturistiriitoja. EEC:n syntymiseen johtaneen Rooman sopimuksen (1957) luonnostelija belgialainen Paul-Henri Spaak on muistelmissaan The Continuing Battle: Memoirs of a European, 1936-1966 työntänyt monet "Euroopan yhdentymisen isät" korokkeelta väittämällä, että tuo titteli ei kuulu kenellekään muulle kuin Josef Stalinille. Näin todetessaan Spaak tulee ilmaisseeksi myös eurooppalaisten pohjimmaisen tunteen Venäjää kohtaan: pelon ja torjunnan.
    ellauri389.html on line 55: Elia (AKA Calle Lammas) presents Chinese porcelain as a visually beguiling item that induces in him an "almost feminine" desire. Such gendered description of longing suggests Elia's participation in a distinctively female consumer culture, and hence his representativeness for the set of social and economic attributes historically associated with it.
    ellauri389.html on line 57: In previous critical examinations of Lamb, Samuel Taylor Coleridge is usually cited as the archetypal representative of romantic imagination that Lamb tried to ape (esp. Sam's colonialistic Kubla Kurkussa). The celebrated philosopher and poet was Lamb's childhood friend, and hence anchors the predominantly biographical criticism on Lamb that accounts for his distinctively precious tone as an evasive expression of his sense of literary inferiority. Similarly, Lamb's 10 years older sister Mary, who murdered their mother in 1796, has been suggested as another source of Charles's supposed romantic agony.
    ellauri389.html on line 59: Significantly, by the time he began the Elia essays - which followed on his failures at verse tragedy and a comic play - Lamb had a thirty-year career at the East India Company, from which he drew a generous income.
    ellauri389.html on line 61: Indeed, the essay not only represents the sales flows that Lamb, in his role as a clerk, tabulated daily, but also it evokes a burgeoning domestic industry that significantly nurtured Coleridge's literary career as well: as is widely known, Coleridge's career as a poet was supported by an annuity he received from the porcelain manufacturers Thomas and Josiah Wedgwood.
    ellauri389.html on line 63:

    The journals flourishing at the start of the century resembled imperial corporations in the extent to which they promoted individual authors, aiding the so-called "minor" romantics in particular. "Old China" illustrates this historically symbiotic collaboration of author with organ not only through its external context in the highly topical London Magazine, but also especially internally, in the essay's ventriloquization of Coleridge.
    ellauri389.html on line 65: Elia, in contrast to Bridget (qua Mary) speaks for a modern sensibility that is attuned to constant stimulation and that revels in the contemporary industrial and imperial economy of surplus and novelty goods. His teacup is an object of debate because it epitomizes precisely the kind of dangerous indulgence Bridget fears: it is a luxury commodity and, with its fashion-dependent pattern and place in a "set" of companion pieces, it inevitably entails additional purchasing. Elia's dialectical opposition to Bridget thus is underscored by his capacity to "love" one pattern of porcelain, and "if possible, [love another] still more". Indeed, Elia's susceptibility to new-sprung marketing strategies is suggested by his acknowledgment that china jars were "introduced" into his imagination by the recently invented tactics of advertising.
    ellauri389.html on line 67: The historical phenomenon transforming porcelain into the flexible economic symbol of "Old China" is imperialism, the recent "favourable circumstances" Elia points out to Bridget, that have enabled them to acquire such "trifles"as his teacup. In discounting the cup as a "trifle," Elia's comment acknowledges both the fall in prices and the rise in Elia's income brought about by the post-Napoleonic expansion of British global commerce, identifying both the general and specific forces that have increased his buying power. In fact, the porcelain trade was a key site of such economic growth spurred by empire and, as the contrasting consumer sentiments in Bridget and Elia's debate attest, is a powerful index to imperialism's recent rehabilitative impact on luxury consumption.
    ellauri389.html on line 69: Elia sees no inconsistency in the fact that porcelain can be both an exclusive luxury item found at "great houses" and an ordinary household accessory such as his teacup, affirming the empire's newly inclusive economy in which porcelain is inexpensive, and a clerk can live like a king; indeed, Elia foregrounds imperialism's integrative effects on porcelain by intimating that his teacup has become precisely the "cheap luxury" for which Bridget always longs. Indeed, the essay itself is replicated by the visual image on Elia's teacup: the cup's picture of "a young and courtly Mandarin, handing tea to a lady from two miles off' is a miniature, orientalized reflection of Elia's and Bridget's (qua Mary) incestuous tea-time smooching.
    ellauri389.html on line 71: The nominal occasion of Lamb's essay is not just Elia's purchase of the teacup, but also Britain's en- trance into China, as it began with the East India Company's annexation of Singa Pura (Singapore) in 1819. The event, which was a pivotal moment in British imperial expansion, extended imperial activity from South Asia to the Far East. More importantly, the development revised a longstanding Sino-British trade imbalance that was particularly caused by porcelain and tea, and hence necessitated a change in British attitudes toward luxury purchases such as porcelain that reversed the animus previously demonstrated by Fielding, who complained that brits echanged the gold of one India to the clay ("mud") of another. Indeed, "Old China" facetiously depicts a cultural sinicization presumably precipitated by this intensification in East Asia-based imperial activity: Elia drinks tea "unmixed," in the Chinese fashion, and experiences an "almost feminine" pleasure in porcelain that likens him to the androgynous "men with women's faces" that Elia associates with China. Fuck the guy was obviously gay.
    ellauri389.html on line 77: All this lexical play upon the word "china" that Elia performs has an imperial logic: it lets a teacup metonymize the East Asian empire. Porcelain collecting is a way of possessing the country, as porcelain purchasers such as Elia display a piece of China earth in British domestic space, offering everyday access to another exotic world every time he indulges in a cup of proverbial British tea. Deliberately confusing his cup's porcelain glaze with "the lucid atmosphere of fine Cathay" Elia imperially assumes the painted pictures on his teacup to be a telescopic vision of China itself ("for so we must in courtesy interpret that speck of deeper blue").
    ellauri389.html on line 79: In fact it was both the soil and a mastery of firing techniques, bolstered by a fiercely protectionist economy, that maintained Chinese porcelain superiority for so long. For much of the eighteenth century, British porcelain manufacturers were unable to replicate the intense heats required to properly fire porcelain. In addition, China further strained British market development by requiring all payment to be in specie and by remaining closed to foreign traders. As a result, when in the late eighteenth century the firing process was finally mastered by domestic china makers such as Wedgwood, Minton, and Spode, China's fierce restrictions against import trade still prevented the British competitors from threatening the supremacy of Chinese industry. A British mission to open China, for example, was stalled as late as 1816. Ironically, this disadvantageous balance of trade between Britain and China actually added to porcelain's appeal.
    ellauri389.html on line 85: Another show of Lamb's "economy" of romantic imagination is his essay, "A Dissertation upon Roast Pig" (1822), which also implicitly recognizes the porcelain industry as a primary theater of contemporary British imperial dominance.
    ellauri389.html on line 87: The essay resembles "Old China" in both its paean to Chinese exports ("China pigs have been esteemed a luxury all over the East, from the remotest periods that we read of"), and its detailed understanding of consumer economics. The titular anecdote is a fable about a Chinese boy's discovery, in the "ages when men ate their meat raw," of the pleasure of roast pig. The wondrous qualities of cooked food produce an immediate "tickling" in one's "nether" or "lower regions", just as Arvi Järnefelt warned. Bo-bo discovers the exquisite flavor when he accidentally sets fire to his house and swine. LOL what idiots, the kinks. Interestingly, roast pig and tea are among the luxuries that the Guernsies hoard during the German occupation.
    ellauri389.html on line 91: "Roast Pig" congratulates the recent breakthrough of domestic porcelain manufacturers by downplaying the long history of Chinese superiority at porcelain-firing techniques, and instead promoting an Englishman's mastery of these activities. The essay portrays the Chinese as irresponsible consumers and more importantly, authorizes English insurance culture as the one safe guarantee of guiltless consumption.
    ellauri389.html on line 93: When "Old China" appeared in 1823, British porcelain had finally gained supremacy over Chinese porcelain. This revolution in the Sino-British trade imbalance was marked when the British porcelain manufacturer Spode began to furnish the Canton branch of the East India Company with English-manufactured "old blue," to compete in local Chinese markets against domestically manufactured porcelain. The event inverted the previously economically crippling import of porcelain to Britain: by 1826 the flow of silver between the countries ran in Britain's favor. The first translation into Chinese of k the Chinese characters that certified real, Chinese-made porcelain. Haha the irony of it all.
    ellauri389.html on line 95: In the early nineteenth century, Britain began a reverse trade into China of opium, a product of Britain's colonial holdings in India and the Levant. The economic consequences of this dumping of opium into China were significant, as the drug, which rendered many Chinese addicted consumers, augmented the reversal of Britain's previous consumer subjugation to China in their desire for porcelain and tea, and indeed evocatively displaced a kind of chinamania to China itself. With its catastrophic vision of obsessive Chinese consumers, the "Dissertation upon Roast Pig" is a comically topical glimpse of such opium-like needs and, as such, the earlier essay, like opium, paves the way for the kind of unencumbered pleasure in consumption that "Old China" relates. "Kubla Khan" was written under the influence of opium.
    ellauri389.html on line 111: Lamb's essay tropes contemporary developments in English political economy as it was most prominently figured by the porcelain industry. Under the auspices of an imperial organ, they unleash John Bull in a china shop, facetiously troping these radical changes in Sino-British consumer history in order to wreak havoc on existing protections of romantic genius. "Old China" is literary chinoiserie for an age shaped by the new imperial industry.
    ellauri389.html on line 123: Around 1811 Charles Lloyd started suffering from auditory hallucinations and "fits of aberration" that resulted in his being confined to an asylum; first at The Retreat, followed by a private asylum at Gretford in Lincolnshire. From 1813 to 1815 he translated nineteen tragedies of Vittorio Alfieri into blank verse (revised and augmented to twenty-two in 1876 by Edgar Alfred Bowring). In 1818 he escaped and turned up at De Quincey's cottage, claiming to be the devil, but managed to reason himself out of that conviction. Soon after he recovered, temporarily, and rejoined his wife in London. A small volume of poems in 1823 ended this burst of creativity, and from that time almost nothing is known of him. He died near Versailles, France, in 1839 aged 63.
    ellauri389.html on line 131: 1Suspension of disbelief is the avoidance — often described as willing — of critical thinking and logic in understanding something that is unreal or impossible in reality, such as something in a work of speculative fiction, in order to believe it for the sake of enjoying its narrative. Vähän sama asia kuin Jamesin "will to believe". Coleridge also referred to this concept as "poetic faith", citing the concept as a feeling analogous to the supernatural, which stimulates the mind's faculties regardless of the irrationality of what is being understood. With a film, for instance, the viewer has to ignore the reality that they are viewing a staged performance and temporarily accept it as their reality in order to be entertained. Early black-and-white films are an example of visual media that require the audience to suspend their disbelief that everything is black and white. Not to mention mute films! Tolkien ei uskonut tollaseen, ei kukaan normaalijärkinen oikeasti edes väliaikaisesti usko örkkeihin ja haltioihin. Sehän on vaan satua!
    ellauri389.html on line 170: BUT: This article has multiple issues. The neutrality of this article is disputed. It is a blatant case of whataboutism. How many were killed by the British Empire? While the precise number of deaths is sensitive to the assumptions we make about baseline mortality, it is estimated that somewhere in the vicinity of 100 million people died prematurely at the height of British colonialism. This is among the largest policy-induced mortality crises in human history.
    ellauri389.html on line 179: Sanakirjailija Ben Zimmerin mukaan termi syntyi Pohjois-Irlannissa 1970-luvulla. Zimmer lainaa historian opettajan Sean O'Conaillin vuoden 1974 kirjettä, joka julkaistiin The Irish Timesissa ja jossa hän valitti "Whatabouteista", ihmisistä, jotka puolustivat IRA:ta osoittamalla brittivihollisensa väitettyjä väärinkäytöksiä. Onkohan Ben Zimmer juutalainen? Zimmer's research on word origins was frequently cited by William Safire's "On Language" column for The New York Times Magazine. Sen isä Dick Zimmer oli senaattori. Toinen Dick Zimmer oli nazikenraali. Se ei ainakaan lie ollut juutalainen.
    ellauri389.html on line 188: Ivan Tsvetkov, Pietarin kansainvälisten suhteiden apulaisprofessori, kiittää Lucasia termin moderneista käyttötavoista. Sekä Trumpia siitä että hän vapautti historioizijat kulttuurisesta käänteestä, joka taantumuxellisesti peukutti ylärakenteen avainmerkitystä historian selityxessä. Merkitystä peliin eikä pelkkää vasaraa ja sirppiä. Idealismia siis ruskeassa käärössä toisella lähettäjänimellä.
    ellauri389.html on line 229: But when we meet in a loud London pub in 2013, he tells me he’s just resigned from his temporary post at the Open University. This is a shock. Philosophers don’t resign. There’s frustration in his voice, but also a certain edgy excitement. What’s going on?
    ellauri389.html on line 231: “It’s complicated,” he says. “On the positive side, this is a wonderful time to explore new ways of communicating with a global audience free from the constraints and obligations of academic life. I’ve seen plenty of philosophy lecturers get increasingly bitter about higher education, and I don’t want to end up like them.
    ellauri389.html on line 235: “But I feel weighed down by the short sightedness, the petty bureaucracy, and the often pointless activities that are creeping into higher education. These things eat time and, more importantly, sap energy. Meanwhile the sand sifts through the hourglass. At the Open University I’d always hoped that we’d be able to offer a named undergraduate degree in philosophy, but actually the subject has, if anything, become marginalised, with fewer courses available than when I joined nineteen years ago, and with much higher fees. This at a time when philosophy is becoming increasingly popular. There had also been suggestions that I might be able to take on an official role promoting the public understanding of philosophy, but that didn’t materialise either.
    ellauri389.html on line 246: Nojuu ensinnäkin hän on republikaani, pitkä miinus heti avauxessa. Hänen mielestään tämä riittääkin ratkaisuxi loppuihinkin ongelmiin. Hänen mielenfilosofiassa puolustamansa näkemykset synnyttävät hänen tarjoamiaan ratkaisuja vapaan tahdon luonteeseen liittyviin metafysiikan ongelmiin ja yhteiskuntatieteiden filosofian ongelmiin, ja nämä puolestaan ​​synnyttävät hänen tarjoamiaan ratkaisuja moraalifilosofian ja poliittisen filosofian ongelmiin. Eli samaa taantumusta kehiin oikein leveällä pensselillä. Lue lisää: Dimova-Cockson, Maria (2012), "Republikanismi, vapauden filosofia ja idealismin historia: Philip Pettitin haastattelu." [kuollut linkki]
    ellauri389.html on line 256: Isaiah Berlin (Jesaja Berlins; 6. kesäkuuta 1909 Riika, Liivinmaan kuvernementti, Venäjän keisarikunta – 5. marraskuuta 1997 Oxford, Englanti) oli latvialaissyntyinen brittiläinen filosofi ja aatehistorioitsija. Häntä pidetään 1900-luvun merkittävimpiin kuuluvana aatehistorioitsijoita. Arvaa oliko hän esinahaton? Kyl-lä! Isaiah Berlin syntyi Riiassa vuonna 1909 keskiluokkaiseen chabad-lubavitch juutalaiseen perheeseen. Isaiah oli liikemiesisän ja kotiäidin ainoa lapsi. Perhe muutti vuonna 1916 Pietariin. Kun bolševikit nousivat Venäjällä valtaan, juutalaiset Berlinit kokivat olonsa vaikeaksi. Perhe sai vuonna 1920 latvialaisina luvan muuttaa takaisin Riikaan, mistä he muuttivat seuraavana vuonna Britanniaan.
    ellauri389.html on line 265: We've heard this song before. Plain and simple, the guy got the sack. Having spoken with almost all of the brilliant philosophical minds alive and at large right now, what’s he discovered? Has a pattern emerged? Can he decipher the wisdom peculiar to our age? He furrows his brow and after some reflection, looks down in his beer and says, “No.”
    ellauri389.html on line 269: As a kid I wanted to be a biologist. I was intrigued by philosophy, but I thought I would never have been able to do it at university because of parental pressure to do something more useful, and also a complete ignorance in my schools about what philosophy was. I say ‘schools’ because I went to a public school for three years, and then my dad, who was an alcoholic, gambled away the money for my education that my mother had inherited, so then I went to a state school. As a result, I specialized in ethics. My wife once described me as a vicar who’d lost his pulpit.
    ellauri389.html on line 297: “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey (etc.)” by William Wordsworth is told to his sister from the perspective of the writer and tells of the power of Nature to guide one’s life and morality. In the final stanza of the poem, it becomes clear that this entire time the poet was speaking to his sister, Dorothy. Eikös Wizard of Ozissa ollut Dorothy? Vanhanaikainen nimi, kuten Raija, joka tule Kreikan adjektiivista rhaidios 'helppo'. Sisko ei ole vielä yhtä panteistinen kuin William. Dorothya esitti Judy Garland vuonna 1939. Samaan aikaan toisaalla saman ikäinen Pirkko Hiekkala väänsi talvisodan propagandaa Turussa Mika Waltarin opastuxella.
    ellauri389.html on line 302: Just as the Christian God determines what is right and wrong for many if not all monkeys around the world, Nature serves this purpose for the narrator. He is, in this tender moment, directing his monologue not to her but to his sister, Dorothy. They are extraordinarily close and he wishes to share with her his adoration for Nature. He is searching for a way to make his sister understand that placing your heart within the hands of Nature is without risk. She should feel the “mountain-winds” on her skin and not resist them.
    ellauri389.html on line 304: At this point, the poem is starting to conclude. Tuntuu jo lopettelevan, suihkaa Dorothy Coleridgelle.
    ellauri389.html on line 306: He states that she will never forget this place and it will become a paradise for “all sweet sounds and harmonies.” His sister will not be run down by “dreary” normalcy even after big brother's death.
    ellauri389.html on line 322: his_wife_Sophia.jpg" width="40%" />
    ellauri389.html on line 323:

    Charles Lloyd the poet with his wife Sophia. Charles (1775-1839) and Sophia (who cares) Lloyd. Engraving from The Lloyds of Birmingham, 1907. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

    ellauri389.html on line 377: Lloyd was intended to have entered his father's bank, but, in Cottle's language, "thought that the tedious and unintellectual occupation of adjusting pounds, shillings, and pence suited those alone who had never, eagle-like, gazed at the sun, or bathed their temples in the dews of Parnassus." Joopa joo. Kuulostaa Olli Blåbergiltä. Psykisk insufficiens.
    ellauri389.html on line 379: As early as 1795 he published a volume of poems at Carlisle, which display a thoughtfulness unusual at his age. In 1796 he made the acquaintance of Coleridge on the latter's visit to Birmingham to enlist subscribers to his Watchman. Fascinated with Coleridge's conversation, Lloyd "proposed even to domesticate with him, and made him such a pecuniary offer that Coleridge immediately acceded to the proposal." This was £80 a year, in return for which Coleridge was to devote 3 hours every morning to his instruction; and although the undertaking (apart from the "domestication") may not have been very strictly performed, Lloyd, much later in life, speaks with enthusiasm of the benefit he had derived from Coleridge's society.
    ellauri389.html on line 381: They lived together at Kingsdown, Bristol, and at the close of 1796 Lloyd accompanied the Coleridges on their move to Nether Stowey. Coleridge's sonnet "To a Friend" on the birth of his son Hartley, and his lines "To a Young Man of Fortune," are probably addressed to Lloyd. Lloyd had already printed at Bristol, for publication in London, a volume of elegiac verse to the memory of his grandmother, Priscilla Pig, introduced by a sonnet from Coleridge, and concluded by "The Grandma" of Charles Lamb, to whom Lloyd had been introduced by Coleridge.
    ellauri389.html on line 383: Almost immediately after his arrival at Nether Stowey, Lloyd was attacked by fits, the precursors of his subsequent madness, and Coleridge described his condition as alarming. He shortly afterwards went to London, where he cultivated the society of Lamb. This was the most afflicted period of Lamb's life. "I had well-nigh," he writes, "quarrelled with Charles Lloyd; and for no other reason, I believe, than that the good creature did all he could to make me happy." Two toothless bleaters.
    ellauri389.html on line 385: Lloyd appears, notwithstanding, to have substantially lived with Coleridge until the summer of 1797. In the autumn of this year all the poems which he deemed worthy of preservation were appended by Joseph Cottle, along with poems by Charles Lamb, to a 2nd edition of Coleridge's poems.
    ellauri389.html on line 387: The collection was headed by an elegant Latin motto on the mutual friendship of the authors, attributed to "Groscollius," but in reality composed by Coleridge. Coleridge shortly afterwards asserted that he had only allowed Lloyd's poems to be published together with his own at the earnest solicitation of the writer, and ridiculed both them and Lamb's poems in sonnets subscribed "Nehemiah Higginbotham" in the Monthly Magazine, November 1797.
    ellauri389.html on line 393: In 1799 Lloyd married Sophia, daughter of Samuel Pemberton of Birmingham, with whom, if De Quincey can be trusted, he eloped by proxy (!), employing no less distinguished a person than Robert Southey to carry her off. He initially resided with her at Barnwell, near Cambridge, whose prosaic landscape is the subject of 1 of his best prosaic poems.
    ellauri389.html on line 395: About August 1800 he took the small mansion of Low Brathay, near Ambleside, where he received Southey and his wife on their return from Portugal, and where De Quincey made his acquaintance in 1807. At that time he appeared enviably happy, enjoying an ample allowance from his father, and blessed with a numerous family of children, and a wife whom De Quincey declares to have been "as a wife and mother unsurpassed by anybody I have known in either of those characters."
    ellauri389.html on line 399: His abilities as a thinker were overrated highly. "It was really a delightful luxury," declares De Quincey, "to hear him giving free scope to his powers for investigating subtle combinations of character." "His mind," says Talfourd, "was chiefly remarkable for a fine power of analysis. In this power of discriminating and distinguishing, in a word nitpicking, carried almost to a pitch of painfulness, Lloyd has scarcely been equalled."
    ellauri389.html on line 401: It was probably about 1811 that Lloyd began to suffer from the distressing auditory illusions so powerfully described by De Quincey, and from the "slight and transient fits of aberration, flying showers from the skirts of the clouds that precede and announce the main storm." A serious illness is mentioned in July 1813. De Quincey seems to intimate that Lloyd undertook his translation of Alfieri as a means of diverting his mind. It appeared in 1815, with a dedication to Southey, who reviewed it in the Quarterly, vol. xiv., and might have spoken with warmer acknowledgment of its homely force and strict accuracy. But didn't.
    ellauri389.html on line 405: Meanwhile Lloyd was placed in an asylum near York, from which he escaped about 1818, and found his way back to Westmoreland, where he suddenly reappeared at De Quincey's cottage. De Quincey vividly describes his condition and conversation, but does not mention, what he privately told Woodhouse, that Lloyd laboured to convince him of his (Lloyd's) identity with the devil, and in trying to establish this assertion ultimately reasoned himself out of it. This anecdote confirms the testimony of Talfourd: "Poor Charles Lloyd! Delusions of the most melancholy kind thickened over his latter days, yet left his admirable intellect free for the finest processes of severe reasoning."
    ellauri389.html on line 407: Mrs. Coleridge, writing to Poole in April 1819, says that Lloyd visited Greta Hall "last summer," and said "he was lost and his wife and children only shadows.’ His mental condition seems to have borne great affinity to Cowper's. (What? oliko "verilähde sydämen" hullun houreita?) Soon after his interview with De Quincey, however, he temporarily recovered, and moved to London, accompanied by his wife, but not, as would appear, by his children.
    ellauri389.html on line 409: In London in June 1819 he was more beneficially affected by the emotion caused by witnessing Macready's performance of Rob Roy, and expressed his feelings in a copy of verses, printed in Macready's Reminiscences.
    ellauri389.html on line 411: For some time he displayed a flurry of literary activity, publishing in 1819 a collection of his poems, under the title of Nugæ Canoræ; in 1821, Desultory Thoughts in London; Titus and Gisippus; and other Poems; and Poetical Essays on the Character of Pope; in 1822, The Duke D'Ormond, a tragedy written in 1798, together with Beritola, a metrical tale in the Italian manner; and a small volume of poems in 1823. Nothing to write home about, alackaday.
    ellauri389.html on line 413: From this time he was silent like a cuckoo after Midsummer, and precise details of his latter days are wanting, but the tone of De Quincey and Talfourd leaves no doubt that they were clouded by insanity, which, nevertheless, left him the power, while sunk in despondency respecting his own condition, of discussing speculative questions with interest and acuteness.
    ellauri389.html on line 417: Lloyd indeed cannot be ranked among the great poets, but his writings are the reflection of an interesting personality.
    ellauri389.html on line 421: His poetry, however, is mainly subjective, and monotonous from the writer's continual self-absorption. His versification is frequently worse than inharmonious, and his diction so prosaic as to evince that his power of expression bore no proportion to his power of thought.
    ellauri389.html on line 423: His best poem is "Desultory Thoughts in London," which contains, with other not so good passages, a beautiful description of his home in Westmoreland, and deeply felt though poorly composed eulogies on Lamb and Coleridge. Tulee mieleen Hansa-ravintolan pojat, ykköskastin köyhät runoilijat ja niitä hännystelevät lahjattomat mutta vakavaraisemmat siivestettävät.
    ellauri389.html on line 434: John Donnen vaimokin oli Ann Donne. Cowper's mother, Anne Donne, belonged to the same family as John Donne. William himself boldly called John his "ancestor" in prose and his "fore-father" in verse. Research indicates that Cowper's mother, Ann Donne, was not a direct descendant of John Donne.
    ellauri389.html on line 438: Knowing there was no chance of obtaining Sir George’s blessing on their union, the two married secretly, probably in December 1601. For this offense Sir George had Donne briefly imprisoned and dismissed from his post with Egerton as well. He also denied Anne’s dowry to Donne. Because of the marriage, moreover, all possibilities of a career in postal service were dashed, and Donne found himself at age 30 with neither prospects for employment nor adequate funds with which to support his household.
    ellauri389.html on line 442: During the next 10 years Donne lived in poverty and humiliating dependence, first on the charity of Anne’s cousin at Pyrford, Surrey, then at a house in Mitcham, about 7 miles (11 km) from London, and sometimes in a London apartment, where he relied on the support of noble patrons. All the while he repeatedly tried (and failed) to secure employment, and in the meantime his family was growing; Anne ultimately bore 12 children, 5 of whom died before they reached maturity. Donne’s letters show his love and concern for his wife during these years: “Because I have transplanted her into a wretched fortune, I must labour to disguise that from her by all such honest devices, as giving her my company, and discourse.” About himself, however, Donne recorded only despair: “To be part of no body is as nothing; and so I am. … I am rather a sickness or a disease of the world than any part of it and therefore neither love it nor life.”
    ellauri389.html on line 444: In 1614 King James I refused Donne’s final attempt to secure a post at court and said that he would appoint him to nothing outside the church. By this time Donne himself had come to believe he had a religious vocation, and he finally agreed to take holy orders.
    ellauri389.html on line 446: Two years after his ordination, in 1617, Anne Donne died at age 33 after giving birth to a stillborn child. Grief-stricken at having lost his emotional anchor, Donne vowed never to marry again, even though he was left with the task of raising his children in modest financial circumstances at the time.
    ellauri389.html on line 523: Ja hänen miehistönsä voittohuudoilla,
    ellauri389.html on line 579: "Kauhistuttavaa, tämä vihattu aalto,
    ellauri389.html on line 582: "Ja nämä luvut ovat kalpeat ja kauhistuttavat,
    ellauri390.html on line 76: Eniten naisia on luopunut nimestä Ahistus. Miehet ovat luopuneet useimmin sukunimistä Törttö ja Pusu. Molemman sukupuolen mustalle listalle yltävät mm Nännimäinen, Mulli, Rampa, Kakkinen, Stubb, Purra, Urpo, Löllö ja Kiimamaa.
    ellauri390.html on line 78: Naisten pois vaihtamia nimiä ovat paizi Ahistus ja Lerssi mm Kaalinpää, Kokotti, Kärpänen ja Hiuspää. Naiset ovat luopuneet usein myös Perhe-sukunimestä.
    ellauri390.html on line 86: Miehet pitävät vaaleaveriköistä mutta naivat mielellään myös tummia. Kaikki tämä ja enemmänkin löytyi tällä erää tuhoon tuomitun Ogelin Kontin ilmaiskirjahyllystä. Paikka aivan kuhisi rollaattoreita työntäviä kääkkiä. Alpakka kiristämätön villasukka 1 pari 12e 2 paria 20e.
    ellauri390.html on line 108: Eivätkä kai kyläläisetkään omasta puolestaan olleet erikoisemmin ihastuneita tämän herrasmiehen tulosta sinne. Silla olipahan heilläkin jo sen verran kokemusta, etteivät uskoneet herrain aina suopein silmin kanssa katselevan. Mutta tämäpä herra ei nyrpeyttä kansanmiehelle osoittanutkaan. Tuli vain tuttavallisesti turinoimaan kuin oman kylän asukas ainakin. Ja pian olivat kylän miehistäkin rotuennakkoluulot hävinneet, joten hyviin suhteisiin pääseminen el kauan ottanut aikaa.
    ellauri390.html on line 171: Ann Radcliffe (os. Ward; 9. heinäkuuta 1764 – 7. helmikuuta 1823) oli englantilainen kirjailija ja goottilaisen kaunokirjallisuuden pioneeri. Hänen tapansa selittää pois yliluonnollisia elementtejä romaaneissaan lisäsi goottilaisen kaunokirjallisuuden arvostusta 1790-luvulla. Radcliffe oli aikansa suosituin kirjailija, jota ihailtiin melkein kaikkialla; samanaikaiset kriitikot kutsuivat häntä mahtavaksi lumottajaksi ja romanssien kirjoittajien Shakespeareksi, ja hänen suosionsa jatkui 1800-luvulla. Kiinnostus Radcliffeen ja hänen työhönsä heräsi eloon 2000-luvun alussa, kun kolme elämäkertaa julkaistiin. Sulaa silkkoahan se on sisältä, mutta sentään nainen ratissa. Sen isä hoisi sen enon Bentleyn ja Wedgwoodin porsliinikauppaa Bathissa. Anne ansaizi kirjoilla 3x enemmän kuin Radcliffe, köyhä lehtineekeri, joten liitto oli auvoinen. Ansaittuaan tarpeexi lapsettomat Radcliffet viettivät loppuelämänsä matkustaen ja viettäen mukavaa elämää koiransa Chancen kanssa. He matkustivat kotimaassa lähes kerran vuodessa vuosina 1797–1811, ja myöhempinä vuosina Radcliffet vuokrasivat vaunun kesäkuukausina voidakseen tehdä matkoja Lontoon lähellä. Annin väitettiin tulleen hulluxi mutta se oli paskapuhetta. Hänen kerrottiin kärsineen astmasta johon hän sai säännöllistä hoitoa.
    ellauri390.html on line 204: Vuonna 1868 hän liittyi 14. Ulan Yamburgin rykmenttiin Grodnon kaupungissa, aliupseerina. Vuonna 1873 hän julkaisi teoksen "The History of the 14th Lancers Yamburg rykmentti", vuonna 1874 hänet siirrettiin kaartiin. Vuonna 1876 hän kokosi Aleksanteri II: n ehdotuksesta "Historia of His Majesty's Ulan Life Guard rykmentin historia".
    ellauri390.html on line 240: Hän käytti "Historia of His Majesty's Life Guard rykmentti" varten kerättyä materiaalia historiallisessa romaanissa "Isoisät" (julkaistu erillisinä painoksina vuosina 1875, 1885, 1891).
    ellauri390.html on line 252: Syksyllä 1945 Vsevolodin pojanpojan, neuvostotaiteilija Igor Krestovskyn elämässä tapahtui traaginen tapahtuma. Jo ennen sodan alkua hänelle annettiin ase ja metsästyksestä tuli hänen todellinen intohimonsa. Metsässä Vyritsan lähistöllä ankkoja metsästäessään häntä ammuttiin vahingossa silmään, joka oli poistettava. Peläten, että tämä voisi vaikuttaa hänen värikäsitykseensä, Krestovsky siirtyi ulkomaalaukseen. Hän menetti näkönsä pysähtyneisyyden kaudella 70-luvulla.
    ellauri390.html on line 291: Eepoksen vaikutus joihinkin balladin teksteihin heijastuu siinä että laulu alkaa prinssipoikien juhlalla, joka on tavallista eeposille. Juhlan kuvauksen ovat kirjoittaneet N. I. Mordovtseva, A. V. Voronezhissa juhla tapahtuu "kirkkaassa Kiovan kaupungissa" (Ust-Tsilma) ja ruhtinas Volkonskin (nimetty eeppisellä ruhtinas Vladimirin nimellä) vaimo kantaa prinssi Vladimirin vaimon eeppistä nimeä - Apraxia.
    ellauri390.html on line 369: Toukokuussa 1808 Kari Malm johti 150 miehen erikoisosastoa, jonka tehtävänä oli hävittää venäläisten varastot Iisalmessa ja Kuopiossa. Hän vangitsi 9. toukokuuta ilman taistelua satamiehisen venäläisosaston Taipaleessa, minkä jälkeen tie oli auki Kuopioon. Malm valloitti Kuopion 12. toukokuuta 1808 ja sai palkkiona ylennyksen majuriksi. Hän jatkoi etenemistään virkauralla Juvalle saakka, josta siirtyi heinäkuussa Joensuuhun ja karkotti siellä olleet venäläiset käyttäen apunaan talonpoikia. Hän voitti 10. elokuuta Pälkjärven taistelussa 600 miehen kokoisella joukolla 2 000 miehen vahvuisen venäläisosaston ja eteni jopa Venäjän puolelle rajaa, mutta joutui lopulta perääntymään ylivoiman edessä Sandels-oluen muun armeijan luo. Everstiluutnantiksi ylennetty Malm osallistui lokakuun 1808 lopussa Koljonvirran taisteluun. Sandels-olut passitti hänet 11. marraskuuta takaisin Koljonvirralle johtamaan vastaiskua, mutta tuolloin Malm haavoittui päähän ja jäi venäläisten vangiksi.
    ellauri390.html on line 431: On his hobnail boots
    ellauri390.html on line 432: Lying with his eyes while his hands are busy
    ellauri390.html on line 434: A soap impression of his wife which he ate
    ellauri390.html on line 539: Ymmärtääkseen buddhalaisuuden ja sen johtajien valtavan vaikutuksen Vietnamin joukkoihin, täytyy ymmärtää buddhalaisuuden historia Vietnamissa. Kun kiinalaisia ​​kirjaimia tuotiin maahan, zen-munkit oppivat ensimmäisinä niiden merkitykset, minkä vuoksi munkit olivat Vietnamin väestön korkeasti koulutetuimpia.
    ellauri390.html on line 577: After attending Embry Riddle Aeronautical University and working for two years, his dream was suddenly and permanently taken away because of a rare medical condition (no IQ).
    ellauri390.html on line 579: In an attempt to chart a new path for his life, he applied to the prestigious Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. He was denied due to– “a lack of significant work experience.”
    ellauri390.html on line 580: After writing a “You have got to be f*cking kidding me” letter to the admissions office, in which he vented his life’s frustrations, he spent the next six months trying to find some sort of footing.
    ellauri390.html on line 581: To his amazement, at the end of the six months, he received a letter telling him he’d been admitted to the program anyway. Somebody had died.
    ellauri390.html on line 584: At the age of 32, after spending several years in high-stress, high profile, long hour jobs (doing what? maissihiutaleita?) he left his “normal” life to finally follow his dream of traveling the world.
    ellauri390.html on line 586: Shortly after his return, he had a stream of conscious typing experience that lasted for 21 days. What flowed through him became a little book called, The Cafe on the Edge of the World. The inspirational story went on to be translated into 44 languages, win Bestseller of the Year nine times, and inspire millions of readers around the world. This despite being rejected by fifty-four publishers.
    ellauri390.html on line 609: Calvert was raised Conservative Jewish and attended synagogue every Shabbat (Saturday) morning until her Bat Mitzvah. Her family switched to a Reform synagogue and began attending only on Jewish holidays. She chose her stage name in honor of Professor Clay Calvert after taking his class on Mass Media Law as a sophomore. She said, "It felt right because really if I hadn't taken his class, I wouldn't be where I am right now," referring to learning during his class that pornography was not so illegal as she had previously thought.
    ellauri390.html on line 679: Presidenttinä hän olisi USAn nuorin presidentti ja ensimmäinen avoimesti homo maan johdossa. Hän tuli kaapista lehtikolumnissaan 2015 ja pian sen jälkeen hän tutustui miesystäväänsä, jonka nimi on ehkä hyvä tietää: Chasten. He avioituivat 2018. Häistä oli netissä live-lähetys. He aktiivisesti esiintyvät netissä. He tutustuivat netin kautta ja he ovat esitelleet kaksi koiraansa netissä. Koirat ovat presidentti Truman and his Buddy. Hoover ei ollut avoimesti homo vaikka palveli 8aa presidenttiä.
    ellauri391.html on line 69:
    We tend to think of Hoover as a stiff and unresourceful man who failed to respond adequately to the coming of the stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression. True enough, but he was also much more than that. Hoover and his wife Lou both spoke fluent Mandarin.

    ellauri391.html on line 106: Se oli Harcourtin korjattu versio, joka ilmestyi joissakin sanomalehdissä seuraavana huhtikuussa 1939, kun Paderewski vieraili Hooverin luona hänen Palo Alto -kodissaan. Mutta jos tämä korjattu versio on totta, miksi Hoover ei käyttänyt sitä muistelmiensa ensimmäisessä osassa, jotka ilmestyivät vuonna 1951? Hooverin ensimmäinen pitkä kuvaus tapahtumasta kirjoitettiin vasta vuosina 1961–1963, jolloin hän aloitti Magnum Opuksensa Puola-osion parissa. George H. Nash ei koskaan julkaissut Hooverin elinaikana, mutta editoi huolellisesti erilaisia ​​luonnoksia ja julkaisi sen vuonna 2011 nimellä Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hooverin toisen maailmansodan salainen historia ja sen jälkimainingit . Laajennetussa alaviitteessä Hoover muistelee 1 500 dollarin suorituspalkkiota, mutta hänellä ja hänen ystävillään oli tarjota Paderewskille vain 150 dollaria. Hooverin mukaan: "Paderewski nauroi ja ehdotti, että keskeytämme kihlauksen johonkin tulevaan tilaisuuteen, kun hän oli lännessä. Eräs jäsenistämme ehdotti, että emme ehkä pystyisi tekemään sitä, koska olisimme saattaneet hajota, ja tarjosi jälleen 150 dollaria. Paderewski nauroi taas ja sanoi, että lykkäämme sitäkin. Muistin tämän jakson hänelle, kun tapasin hänet pääministerinä rauhankonferenssissa. Hän naurahti taas."
    ellauri391.html on line 164: Hamann deserves to be known precisely because he was the first to voice counter-Enlightenment views. Named by Goethe as the "brightest intellect of his era," Hamann, a resident of Königsberg, East Prussia, and friend of Kant, was denied access to a professorship or a pastoral call because he was a stutterer. Having undergone a conversion experience while on a business trip to London that had gone awry, he disavowed the Enlightenment ideal of limiting truth to autonomous reason. In a word, autonomous reason is no substitute for "Christ" (the word).
    ellauri391.html on line 166: Instead, God is revealed to be a poet and his poem is nothing other than the creation, an invention of God's speech. The Bible is the "divine Aeneid," charting the waters of human life, making sense of the odyssey of human life. Jesus is Aeneas, God is Anchises, and Maria of Magdala is Dido.
    ellauri391.html on line 204: Jotkut analogiat esitetään tiivistettynä (esim. metaforiksi ) jättämällä pois termit, jolloin yhteen asiaan viitataan mainitsemalla toinen: A on C . (On olemassa ydintapaus, johon muut termit liittyvät useilla eri tavoilla.) Joten "God is Good" on analogia "the goodness of humans is to their nature as the goodness of God is to his nature." Apina on hyvä kun se tekee kaikille apinoille hyvää, jumala on hyvä kun se tekee kaikille jumalille hyvää. Eli izelleen, kerta niitä on vain 1.
    ellauri391.html on line 215: The American company was founded by William Henry Hoover (1849–1932) and his son Herbert William Hoover, Sr. (1877–1954). The surname Hoover is an Anglicized version of the German Huber, originally designating a landowner or a prosperous small-scale farmer.
    ellauri391.html on line 217: Hoover pölkkärin kexi näiden huubereiden todnäk juutalainen disaineri Henry Dreyfuss. On October 5, 1972, the bodies of Henry Dreyfuss (aged 68) and his wife and business partner Doris Marks Dreyfuss (aged 69) were found dead in the garage at 500 Columbia Street in South Pasadena, California by Dr. Edward Evans, the family physician. They committed suicide together. (Not Edward.) Clasu ja Ebba temput tekivät.
    ellauri391.html on line 219: Another Henry Dreyfus (or Henri Dreyfus, 7 January 1882 – 30 December 1944) was a Swiss inventor of the modern weaving loom. He and his brother Camille Dreyfus also invented Celanese, an acetate yarn.
    ellauri391.html on line 224: Dreyfus is a nickname for a man who had to use a crutch. The surname, which was originally derived from the German word drivuoss, which means a tripod or a cooking pot with three legs, was also applied to a person who "stood for" or was tolerant of everything. Prominent among members of the name Dreyfus in this period include Alfred Dreyfus (1859-1935), who as a French army captain was falsely accused of treason.
    ellauri391.html on line 227: He married his Stanford sweetheart, Lou Henry, and they went to China, where he worked for a private corporation as China’s leading engineer. In June 1900 the Boxer Rebellion caught the Hoovers in Tientsin. For almost a month the settlement was under heavy fire. While his wife worked the hospitals, Hoover directed the building of barricades, and once rescued his life risking Chinese children.
    ellauri391.html on line 229: After capably serving as Secretary of Commerce under Presidents Harding and Coolidge, Hoover became the Republican Presidential nominee in 1928. He said then: “We in America today are nearer to the final triumph over poverty than ever before in the history of any land.” His election seemed to ensure prosperity. Yet within months the stock market crashed, and the Nation spiraled downward into depression.
    ellauri391.html on line 231: At the same time he reiterated his view that white people must not suffer from hunger and cold, but caring for them must be primarily a local and voluntary responsibility.
    ellauri391.html on line 233: His opponents in Congress, who he felt were sabotaging his program for their own political gain, unfairly painted him blue and black as a callous and cruel President. Hoover became the scapegoat for the Depression and was badly defeated in 1932. In the 1930’s he became a powerful critic of the New Deal, warning against tendencies toward statism.
    ellauri391.html on line 261: Ilmoituxet Kristuksen katoamisesta lyhtypylväissä vasta paljastaa ihmisen täydellisen pimeyden ja etäisyyden Jumalasta kazoen. Wenn Gott Mensch werden musste, damit war ein Licht ausgeflammt. Ilmoituxen historiallisuutta yritetään tuon tuostakin jämentää, mutta se on väärin sammutettu.
    ellauri391.html on line 364: Luther tunsi hyvin tahdonvapaudesta käytyä filosofista ja teologista keskustelua, mm. John Streleckyn "Maailmanopun kahvilan". Erityisen tähdellistä on tehdä ero kyvyn ja tahdon välillä. Usein tahtoa kyllä olisi, mutta liha on heikko. Tell me about it. Luther piti tätä erottelua myös teologiassa keskeisenä. Se ei ollut hänen mielestään vain filosofeille jännää spekulaatiota, vaan vastauksen antaminen kysymykseen, voiko ihminen valita vapaasti hyvän ja pahan välillä, oli erityisen keskeinen myös vanhurskauttamisopin ymmärtämisessä. Mitä jännää se on jonsei pahaa voi edes valita. Klassisessa keskustelussa kysymys kuului, voiko ihminen valita vapaasti elämänsä päämäärän. Tähän kysymykseen vastattiin filosofian- ja teologianhistoriassa ennen Duns Scotusta ja William Ockhamia yksiselitteisen kielteisesti. Käsityksessään sidotusta ratkaisuvallasta Luther liittyy ainakin jossain määrin perinteiseen filosofiseen ja teologiseen käsitykseen, jonka mukaan ihminen ei voi valita päämäärää, ainoastaan keinot. So there, Casey! Mansikka- ja raparperipiirakkasi ei muuta asiaa.
    ellauri391.html on line 397: Mutta toisaalta ei apinallakaan saa olla voittavaa strategiaa! se olis vastoin lunastuxen pelisääntöä. Vain jumala ize pinokkion hahmossa saa tehdä ihmepelastuxen. Hmm. Apinalla on strategia ryömiä rähmällään Jeesuxen jaloissa, josta hyvästä koira heittää sille pelastuxen ydinluun. Eikös sekin ole eräänlainen strategia, joskin aika koiramainen pelitapa. Ja se on voittava, koska kolmikko tuli luvanneexi että pyytävälle annetaan, ja koputtavalle avataan, ei niillä ole siinä enää valinnan mahista. Siis apina pääsee kuin pääseekin maaliin omin voimin, vaikka avustettuna kuin Imi uima-altaaseen! Te olette voittaneet! Gut! Gut!
    ellauri391.html on line 413: Suurin osa apinoista on oikeistopahixia, seuraavaxi suurin vasemmistopahixia, pieni joukko löytyy vasemmistohyvixiä, ja häviävän vähän oikeistohyvixiä. Jumala on selkeästi oikeistopahis.
    ellauri391.html on line 442: Pääasiassa saksalaista alkuperää oleva Luther tarkoittaa "kansan sotilasta" elementeistä liudiz, "kansat" ja harjaz, "armeijan johtaja" tai "soturi". Ei ole yllätys, että sellainen nimi jättää jätöxensä historiaan, ei kerran vaan kahdesti, ensin protestanttisen Martti Lutherin kiihtyessä ja sitten samannimisen nirhatun coon pastorin. de Luder tarkoittaa a) lutkaa ja b) haaskaa. sv Prostituerad kvinna, även prostituerad man; allmänt skällsord till en person; as, skitstövel, kräk · dött djur som av jägare ... Hon klär sig så vulgärt som vore hon ett luder.
    ellauri391.html on line 522: Chen Hao is the younger brother of Chen Xi, he along with his brother and grandfather lived far away in a lone place after the extermination of their clan. He is extremely talented and has an innate talent in sword dao cultivation.
    ellauri391.html on line 524: At an age of 15 he cultivated to Violet Palace 7th Star, and his Martial Dao had attained the Dao Insight Stage.The Dao Insight he comprehended was the Righteous Sword Dao.
    ellauri391.html on line 547: Ultimately, Kimhi’s work elucidates the essential sameness of thinking and being that has exercised Western philosophy since its inception. "To his admirers, Kimhi is a hidden giant, a profound thinker…Strives to do a lot in a short space, aiming to overthrow views about logic and metaphysics that have prevailed in philosophy for a century."
    ellauri391.html on line 558: Ever since completing his Ph.D. at the University of Pittsburgh in 1993, the Israeli philosopher Irad Kimhi has been building the résumé of an academic failure. After a six-year stint at Yale in the ’90s that did not lead to a permanent job, he has bounced around from school to school, stringing together a series of short-term lectureships and temporary teaching positions in the United States, Europe and Israel. As of June, his curriculum vitae listed no publications to date — not even a journal article. At 60, he remains unknown to most scholars in his field.
    ellauri391.html on line 560: To his admirers, Kimhi is a hidden giant, a profound thinker who, because of a personality at once madly undisciplined and obsessively perfectionistic, has been unable to commit his ideas to paper. As a result, he has not been able to share his insights — about logic, language, metaphysics, theology, psychoanalysis, aesthetics and literature — with the wider academic world.
    ellauri391.html on line 562: This type of character, though unusual, is not unheard-of in philosophy. Unlike, say, history or sociology, philosophy has long reserved a place for the occasional talent who struggles or declines to publish. The tradition dates back to Socrates, and was boldly carried on by Esa Saarinen.
    ellauri391.html on line 563: The philosopher Robert Pippin, who has helped secure positions for Kimhi at the University of Chicago, explains that drafts of the manuscript have circulated to great excitement, if among “a very curated audience.” Harvard University Press was interested in publishing the book as early as 2011, but Kimhi, ever the perfectionist, was reluctant to let it go, forever refining and refashioning. Perhaps his foot-dragging was an expression of doubt, too: Could any book live up to his reputation?
    ellauri391.html on line 570: Kimhi argues that this view is wrong, and that the distinction between psychology and logic has led our understanding of thinking astray. Consider that the following statement does not, according to the standard view, constitute a logical contradiction: “It’s raining, but I don’t believe it’s raining.” Why? Because the first part of the sentence concerns a state of affairs in the world (“it’s raining”), whereas the second part concerns someone’s state of mind (“I don’t believe it’s raining”).
    ellauri391.html on line 572: Kimhi wants to rescue the intuition that it is a logical contradiction to say, “It’s raining, but I don’t believe it’s raining.” But to do this, he has to reject the idea that when you assert a proposition, what you are doing is adding psychological force (“I think … ”) to abstract content (“it’s raining”). Instead, Kimhi argues that a self-conscious, first-person perspective — an “I” — is internal to logic. For him, to judge that “it’s raining” is the same as judging “I believe it’s raining,” which is the same as judging “it’s false that it’s not raining.” All are facets of a single act of mind.
    ellauri391.html on line 576: In other words, the distinction between psychology and logic collapses. Logic is not a set of rules for how to think; it is how we think, just not in a way that can be captured in conventional scientific terms. Thinking emerges as a unique and peculiar activity, something that is part of the natural world, but which cannot be understood in the manner of other events in the natural world. Indeed, Kimhi sees his book, in large part, as lamenting “the different ways in which philosophers have failed to acknowledge — or even denied — the uniqueness of thinking.”
    ellauri391.html on line 578: Genius? Folly? Something in between? It is hard to canvass a wide range of opinion about Kimhi’s work. He and his book have, until now, existed within a relatively small subsection of the philosophical world. But even within that world, there are those who are wary of his intellectual project — yet impressed by it all the same. Brandom, whose life’s work relies on the distinction between force and content that Kimhi attacks, admits to finding his former student’s ideas “deeply uncongenial” and “threatening.” He also describes them, however, as “radically original” and part of a new intellectual movement that is “bound to transform our philosophical understanding.”
    ellauri391.html on line 666: Penn maksoi intiaaneille mielestään kohtuullisen 1 200 punnan kertakorvauksen näiltä förbimistään maista. Voltaire praised this "Great Treaty" as "the only treaty between those people [Indians and Europeans] that was not ratified by an oath, and that was never infringed." Many, including the now near-extinct lenni-lenapes, regard the Great Treaty as a myth that just somehow sprung up around Penn. Penn kept slaves but treated them in a way that he considered fair. Penn ei ize asunut Pennsylvaniassa vaan briteissä.
    ellauri392.html on line 93: David Harry Hirsch (1930-1999) taught English and American literature and Judaic Studies at Brown University from 1961 until his death in 1999 at age 69. His field of study was English and American literature, with an emphasis on the literature of Edgar Allan Poe, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Herman Melville, and T. S. Eliot. Aika luurankogalleria. He also contributed greatly to the fields of Literary and Linguistic theory. His collection of essays The Deconstruction of Literature: Criticism After Auschwitz (1991) was the product of his research on Deconstruction theory and its relation to the ideas of Martin Heidegger, who was a supporter of Nazi politics.
    ellauri392.html on line 95: Professor Hirsch introduced the literature of the Holocaust to the Brown University curriculum in 1983, and he taught courses in Holocaust memoir, song, poetry, and fiction. In collaboration with his wife Roslyn, a survivor of the Tarnopol Ghetto, he translated Justyna's Narrative, a Polish Holocaust memoir by Gusta Davidson Draenger, and Auschwitz: True Tales from a Grotesque Land, by Sara Nomberg-Przytyk. He also translated from Yiddish Ghetto Kingdom, the stories of Isaiah Spiegel; the poetry of Abraham Sutzkever (paasattu); and Aleksander Kulisiewicz’s songs from the Nazi death camps. Professor Hirsch died in 1999 and was survived by his wife Roslyn and son Joe, the only two Hirsch survivors. He had been hospitalized for several weeks for intestinal surgery, his family said. Well, actually, he was survived by his wife; a daughter, Helene Wingens of West Caldwell, N.J.; a son, Joseph, of Brooklyn; a sister, Rosalyn Suchow of Fort Lee, N.J., and two grandchildren.
    ellauri392.html on line 133: Heidegger sekoitti pahasti puurot ja vellit Bremenissä 1949 verratessaan holokaustia teknillisenä saavutuxena tehomaatalouteen, urbanisaatioon ja vetypommikexintöön. Pahis on myös revisionisti Ernst Nolte, jonka mielestä holokausti on vain yxi blip apinoiden julmuuxien valtavalla radar-ruudulla. Oikeassa olette veitikat, ihan jokainen.
    ellauri392.html on line 332: For all the history of grief Surun kaikki historia
    ellauri392.html on line 372: To such I dedicate this rhyme and what it may contain.
    ellauri392.html on line 391: Beatrice Portinari whom history gives.
    ellauri392.html on line 407: Very magnificent when his brother
    ellauri392.html on line 420: And as for this line I stole it from T.S. Eliot
    ellauri392.html on line 444: Has got his middle name wrong.
    ellauri392.html on line 497: And lost, murderer of his daughter
    ellauri392.html on line 498: Killed by his wife and (other) daughter.
    ellauri392.html on line 499: Killed by his death killing his life.
    ellauri392.html on line 500: Stabbed in the back in his bath.
    ellauri392.html on line 512: They would do, a nation of sophists.
    ellauri392.html on line 517: And got enslaved for his pains.
    ellauri392.html on line 526: Who, as I say came home and was killed in his bath
    ellauri392.html on line 527: Killing his wife and his daughter.
    ellauri392.html on line 528: And if you don’t know about this you ought to.
    ellauri392.html on line 562: Agamemnon came home and, as I said, was stabbed by his wife
    ellauri392.html on line 563: In his bath. Anyway it is the lark, my love,
    ellauri392.html on line 580: The motto of this poem heed
    ellauri392.html on line 593: Felix Leiter julkaisi NYU:lle kirjeen, joka oli kirjoitettu epämääräisen Ronellin puolustamiseksi. Kirjeen ovat kirjoittaneet ja allekirjoittaneet suuret hahmot feminismin, queer-teorian, filosofian, kirjallisuuden ja historian aloilta, mukaan lukien rekkalesbo Judith Butler, luihu Slavoj Žižek, Joan "Beam Me Up" Scott, Geriatri Chakravorty Spivak, Jean-Luc Nancy, ja muut vähemmän julkerot. Lisäksi Lisa Duggan ja Hantta Krause julkaisivat blogikirjoituksia, joissa dementoitiin Ronellin syytteet seksuaalisesta häirinnästä. Myöhemmin kirjettä kritisoitiin siitäkin, että siinä ehdotettiin, että Ronellin pitäisi saada anteeksi hänen akateemisen panoksensa merkityksen perusteella, ja siitä, että Reitmanilla katsottiin olleen "ilkeä tarkoitus" ja Ronellilla "kiltti". #MeToo -liike joutui pilkan kohteeksi, kun feministitutkijat jatkoivat Ronellin tukemista seksuaalisesta väärinkäytöksestä huolimatta. Butler pahoitteli myöhemmin jotakin kirjeen sanamuotoa ja pahoitteli, että se vihjasi "että Ronellin asema ja maine ansaitsevat hänelle kaikenlaisen erityiskohtelun". Žižek väitti, että Ronellin vuosia kestänyt Reitmanin seksuaalinen häirintä oli vain "sarja eksentrisyyttä". Pieni vinous on vain luonnollista tämän kaliiperin nerolla. Duggan kutsui Ronellin sähköposteja Reitmanille "omituisen läheisyyden käytännöiksi".
    ellauri392.html on line 602: While at Cambridge, Forrest-Thomson met and married literary critic Jonathan Culler, who lsubsequently, after dumping Veronica and hitching onto Claire, became famous for his theories tying linguistics into the study of literature. Her rising trajectory was cut abruptly short: on April 26, 1975, Veronica died in what seems to have been an alcohol- and drug-fueled accident. (She was known to rely on sleeping pills, and, according to her editor, she had been drinking heavily.)There’s evidence that her death was unintentional as she was due to perform in a reading that same weekend. She just boozed herself to death. Not the first poet there, nor the last.
    ellauri392.html on line 618: Adrienne syntyi New Jerseyssä (a-ha!) mutta varttui St. Johnsburyssa, Vermontissa 10-vuotiaana. Hän opiskeli yksityiskoulua St. Johnsbury Academyssa (naah). Valmistuttuaan sieltä hiän oli työskennellyt uskomattoman lujasti. Payton hyödynsi SJA:n laajaa kurssivalikoimaa. Marcella uppoutui täysin visuaalisiin taiteisiin. Sam tunsi kunnian olla opiskelijajohtaja ja urheilija. Adrienne kirjoitti pulmalehtisen pääkiviprojektina loppuvuonna 2006. No toisaalta SJA on syrjömätön opinahjo, joten the bet is on. She has written poems and a history of crosswords. Kirja syntyi hänen ristisanatehtävää käsittelevästä väitöskirjastaan.
    ellauri392.html on line 667: Harrystä ranut ja sakut eivät ymmärrä että Amerikan historia on sui generis, se ei ole tollasta whackingia kuin reign of terror ja kaasukammiot. Inkkarien puzaus, orakauppa ja verinen kansalaissota oli jotain ihan muuta, positiivisempaa, puhumattakaan Korean, Vietnamin ja Irakin sodista ja kähminnästä uuden mantereen banaanitasavalloissa. Mutta kontinentaalit vaan vihaavat liberaalidemokratiaa yleensä ja amerikkalaista suurkapitalismia erityisesti. Foucault halveeraa "yxilöä", "liberaalia demokratiaa" ja "lakia ja oikeutta". Foucaultin masentavaa apinankuvaa paljon valoisampi on Genesixen versio, missä apinan käsketään lisääntymään kovasti ja tekemään paratiisista tehomaanviljelys. Seuraavaxi paras apinan majesteetillisuuden julistus on sit American Bill of Rights. Huoh, ei jaxa. Disziplin ei ole paha asia. Arbeit macht frei sanoi jo Thoreau Juuso Walden pondilla. Disregarding the gibes of those who are less fortunate than ourselves.
    ellauri392.html on line 674: Artikkelissa 1941 otsikolla "Juutalaiset nykyisessä kirjallisuudessa", de Man väittää, että "juutalaiset" ovat "saastuttaneet" modernin kirjallisuuden ja että "sivilisaatiomme" on vastustanut "seemiläisten soluttautumista kaikkiien eurooppalaisten elämään". Hänen johtopäätöksensä on, että Euroopan juutalaisten lähettäminen "Euroopasta eristettyyn" siirtokuntaan (Israel) olisi "ratkaisu juutalaisten ongelmaan", eikä sillä olisi "valitettavia seurauksia" kirjallisuudelle. Siihen mennessä Belgian juutalaisvastaiset lait oli jo säädetty, mikä sulki juutalaiset pois lakimiehistä, opettamisesta, julkishallinnosta ja journalismista. 4. elokuuta 1942, ensimmäinen Belgian juutalaisten juna lähti Auschwitziin mutta de Man vain jatkoi saman scheissen kirjoittamista Le Soir -sanomalehteen , jota natsit kontrolloivat ja jossa hän näyttää saaneen aseman setänsä Hendrik de Manin, vaikutusvaltaisen poliitikon, ansiosta. Jacques Derrida julkaisi pitkän artikkelin vastauksena kritiikkiin, jossa hän vahvisti, että "juger, condamner l'œuvre ou l'homme comme ça, c'est reproduire le geste d'extermination dont on accuse de Man" (tarkista lainaus ranskaksi).
    ellauri392.html on line 689: Harry on suorastaan Jesaja-luokan rähisijä, se on sille annettava. Käy jopa kateexi. Pluralistically minded universally tolerant American indeed.
    ellauri392.html on line 730: They have represented the indicators of their bad destiny, their sacrifice for the better world by the solitude and alienation of Jewish individuals in America, turning back to the historical facts (since the Second World War) as the cause for the atrocity towards Jews and their suffering then and now. The writers put the Jews on the pedestal of a sublime nation and at the same time made them victims of modern society. The Jewish writers took a chance in American literature which had a didactic effect, using another common argument, not easily compatible with the theory of superior American morals but certainly applicable. [Ни сам не разумем ову тачку.] The writers would claim they had a duty to portray how people actually think and behave. But the writers also had a duty to implant moral lessons.
    ellauri392.html on line 743: Another Bellow’s novel, Dangling Man, is written in the personal voice of the protagonist whose principal domain is his own sensibility, and whose principal audience is he himself. The text is striking in its exclusion of the female voice, its enactment of a homo-social male world, and the overt narcissism and misogyny of its protagonist, Joseph. It is the story of a young man caught in the trap of self-pity, who believes that intellectual or spiritual enlightenment is to be attained by personal isolation within the confines of a cheap New York boarding house room while he studies the writers of the Enlightenment. Failing that, he joins the Merchant Marine just to fail there too. Saul's own life story to the dot.
    ellauri392.html on line 745: Herzog continues to be Bellow’s “biggest book” and it used to be on the New York Times best-seller list for one entire year. At its heart is Bellow’s profound shock at discovering, a year after his separation from Sondra, (Alexandra Tschacbasov, his second wife) her affair with their mutual friend, Jack Ludwig, Bellow lapsed into deep depression and produced an intensely self-justifying hero who was tearful, cuckolded, and utterly humiliated. Moses Herzog, a Jewish intellectual type is essentially precipitated into intellectual and spiritual crisis by the failure of his marriage. The plot of the novel is slender. Herzog leaves his home and marriage, fails in the classroom, abandons his academic project, and undertakes a mas-sive spiritual and intellectual obligation to keep the letters for God. At the end of it, he seems to have regained his sense of Jewish identity, purged himself of violent anger, abandoned his latest mistresses, and repented for his dandy style. He has had a profound education in the realities of human nature, and rediscovered the value of nature and solitude on his lushy Ludeyville estate.
    ellauri392.html on line 747: The Jews have endured heavy atrocities during a long period of time and they have used that to the utmost to become an influential, powerful, rich and respected people. Nobody could say that any person in Jewish community ever forgets the painful history of their own nation. It is like the Beilis case which is credited as the main contributing factor in bringing about the Russian Revolution.The actual case occurred between 1911 and 1913 in the Ukrainian capital, Kiev.
    ellauri392.html on line 749: The presence and strength of Jewish community is not only perpetuated in their history;
    ellauri392.html on line 750: it has been shown in literature, art and film, elegantly and majestically but very often by the latent thematic structure and by the strong psychological portraits of their characters. (The American film industry is mainly run by - guess who.) Jewish authors always have in their heads the immense and sacred goal: glorifying the history, the roots and customs of the Jewish people, and specifically the permanent expression of Jewish self-compassion.
    ellauri392.html on line 823: This ultimate tunnel vision of pursuing “intellectual liberation”å through a narrow tube of Heidegger seen through Derrida seen through de Man is reminiscent of a Yiddish proverb: “Az der vorem zitst in khreyn, meynt er az es iz keyn zisers nito.” Kun mato istuu piparjuuressa, se ei tiedä mitään ihanampaa paikkaa.
    ellauri392.html on line 853: Wilhelm Waiblinger gilt als der „junge Wilde“ der Biedermeierzeit, den seine Nachwelt offenkundig aus moralischen Gründen weitgehend ignoriert hat. Er war auch nichts weiteres als Dichter. Er schloss viele Freundschaften, worunter die homoerotisch geprägte Beziehung zu Eduard Mörike sicherlich eine der wichtigsten war. Zu Waiblingers Freunden, Förderern und Verehrern zählten weiter u. a. die weiteren Uranier Gustav Schwab, August von Platen, Friedrich von Matthisson, Johann Heinrich Dannecker, Matthias Schneckenburger, Eduard Gnauth, Carl Miedke und Christian Friedrich Wurm.
    ellauri392.html on line 942: "Frederick Jamesonin ja Terry Eagletonin kaltaiset vanhamarxilaiset politrukkibimbot jakelivat lunatsharskilta kuulostavia tuomioitaan postmodernismin oletetulle historiattomuudelle, poliittiselle sisällöttömyydelle, kitschille, pastisseille ja skitsofrenialle".
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 30: Mazurka por dos muertos. This is definitely my favourite of Cela’s works. It shows a return to a more traditional narrative style, though it is not without its post-modernist elements. The story starts with the tale of the death of Lázaro Codesal, who was killed by a Moroccan when on service in Morocco, while masturbating under a fig tree.


    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 42: To this my plain, sworn, downright detestation mun simppeliä synnynnäistä ällötystä
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 265: Pitkään ollut voimat vähissä ja työkyky heikko.

    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 536: Mutta ei tod. palikkapää, vaan hienostunut, hienopiirteinen. Hävettää olla näin asenteellinen, mutta en tykkää noista miehistä. Eivät nekään minusta, luultavasti.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 545: Mutta paranisiko naapurisopu... Ikävä kyllä mun frendini ovat kaikki sen verran köyhiä, ettei niillä edes periaatteessa ole mahista.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 622: Moreover, my virus makes a dedicated desktop supplied with keylogger function from the system , so I could collect all contacts from ya e-mail, messengers and other social networks. I've chosen this e-mail cuz It's your corporate address, so you should read it.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 624: I think that 650 usd is pretty enough for this little false. I made a split screen vid(records from screen (u have interesting tastes ) and camera ooooooh... its awful AF)
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 627: You have one day after opening my message, I put the special tracking pixel in it, so when you will open it I will see.If ya want me to share proofs with ya, reply on this letter and I will send my creation to five contacts that I've got from ur contacts.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 639: BTW, when you sent this mail to me, I captured your GPS location from it and got a good bit of satellite camera footage of you fucking your favorite camel, the one with the big warts in the ass. And of him fucking you. You both smile beatifically to the camera.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 656: 17/07/2019 - on this day I hacked your OS and got full access to your account v-jaosto@yahoogroups.com.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 657: You can check it - I sent this message from your account.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 663: I just hacked this router and placed my malicious code on it.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 666: After that, I made a full dump of your disk (I have all your address book, history of viewing sites, all files, phone numbers and addresses of all your contacts).
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 690: For this payment I give you two days (48 hours).
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 691: As soon as this letter is opened, the timer will work.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 698: - Do not try to contact me (you yourself will see that this is impossible, I sent you an email from your account)
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 702: This is the word of honor hacker.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 704: I also ask you to regularly update your antiviruses in the future. This way you will no longer fall into a similar situation.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 755: Samaa helluntaisanomaa se levittää kuin muutkin tälläset oman avun aapiset: tän kun teet, niin elämäsi lähtee uuteen nousuun, susta tulee nuori hoikka kaunis ja haluttu, sun yrityksen liikevaihto lähtee kohiseen. Kato musta mallia.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 905: Childe Harold provided the first example of the Byronic hero. The hero must have a rather high level of intelligence and perception as well as be able to easily adapt to new situations and use cunning to his own gain. It is clear from this description that this hero is well-educated and by extension is rather sophisticated in his style. Aside from the obvious charm and attractiveness that this automatically creates, he struggles with his integrity, being prone to mood swings.

    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 906: Generally, the hero has a disrespect for certain figures of authority, thus creating the image of the Byronic hero as an exile or an outcast. The hero also has a tendency to be arrogant and cynical, indulging in self-destructive behaviour which leads to the need to seduce men or women. Although his sexual attraction through being mysterious is rather helpful, it often gets the hero into trouble.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 1255: his pinky once more all the way in there.

    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 1344: lällyltä pyhistelijältä se vaikutti,

    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 1552: Rikkaat rikastuvat köyhistä.

    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 142: Vaimo vaan kauhistui, ei ollenkaan suostunut siihen.

    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 361: Leibniz, joka keksi että tämä maailma on paras mahdollinen, oli aivan toisenlainen. Hän oli leppoisa, ei kiihkeä, ammattimies, ei harrastelija. Toimeentulonsa hän hankki kirjoittamalla Hannover suvun historiaa ja maineensa kirjoittamalla huonoa filosofiaa. Kirjoitti hän hyvääkin filosofiaa, mutta sitä hän ei julkaissut, koska se olisi maksanut hänen eläkkeensä, jonka hän sai ruhtinailta.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 427: Kuten tämä [sodanjälkeisen tuotantopulan] esimerkki osoittaa, on ihmisen pahin vihollinen tätä nykyä ihminen. Miten niin tätä nykyä? ainahan se on ollut homo hominille lupus. Ensin tapettiin neandertaalit ja muut lähisukulaiset, sit muu elävä ja sitä lyytä itsemme. Siksi ei kohta enää ole ketsujaaa.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 447: Miehisen sukupuolen etevämmyys oli entisinä aikoina helppo todistaa, sillä jos nainen epäili miehensä etevämmyyttä, mies sai lyödä häntä. Ja miesten tämän alan voittoisuudesta seurasivat kaikki muut paremmuudet. Miehet olivat älykkäämpiä kuin naiset, kekseliäämpiä, eivät niin epävakaisia tunteiltaan kuin naiset, jne.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 449: Miesten vallasta on ollut seurauksena monta erittäin valitettavaa onnettomuutta. Se teki kaikkein likeisimmän suhteen - aviosuhteen - herran ja orjan väliseksi suhteeksi. Se eristyneisyys, jota avioliitto vaati kunniallisilta naisilta, teki nämä typeriksi ja ikäviksi (oops, väistäpä Pertti nyrkkiä), ainoat naiset jotka pystyivät olemaan kiinnostavia ja jännittäviä, oli kokotit. Kun kunnialliset naiset oli ikäviä, tuli useimpien maiden kaikkein sivistyneimmistä miehistä homoseksuaalisia. Tai bi, nimiä kuten Bert nyt mainitsematta. Hyvä meriselitys. Ahtaampi reikä jännittää kai enemmän.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 674: Päivisin se rähisee, öisin sähisee.

    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 812: Rouvan mies on mytomaani, kirjoittaa maanisesti runoja. Siinä on jotain kauhistuttavaa. Se on selkeästi sairasta. Rouva harkitsee, pitäiskö siihen panna stoppi. Se on kohta koppikunnossa.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 863: Ensimmäisen vuoden journalismin opiskelijat oppivat viiden W: n (kuka, mitä, missä, milloin ja miksi). Vaikka sinulla ei ehkä ole aikomusta tulla ammattimaiselle toimittajalle, jos aiot kirjoittaa blogeihisi alkuperäisiä, hyviä artikkeleita, viiden viikon käyttäminen on älykäs tapa päästä mukaan.

    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1057: In the words of his uncle Bobrowski, as a young man Conrad was "extremely sensitive, conceited, reserved, and in addition excitable. In short [...] all the defects of the Nałęcz family."
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1059: Conrad suffered throughout life from ill health, physical and mental. A newspaper review of a Conrad biography suggested that the book could have been subtitled Thirty Years of Debt, Gout, Depression and Angst. Conrad had a phobia of dentistry, neglecting his teeth until they had to be extracted.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1061: Tutun oloista. Jimin paholainen ex machina on Brown, ruskee kakka jonka Conrad meikkaa niin pahixex kun pystyy. Six on kiinnostavaa millanen se on. Toinen vaikka pienempi pahis on sekarotuinen dago Cornelius, jonka pahin luonnevika on että se on 'abject', eli nöyristelevä. Kyllä Konrad izekin vähän nöyristeli, muutti aina mieltä kuulijoiden mukana. Lasketteli luikuria tarvittaessa. Sille oli lukijakunta tosi tärkeä.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1063: Brown was a latter-day buccaneer, sorry enough, like his more celebrated prototypes...They never failed to let you know, too, that he was supposed to be a son of a baronet. The others were merrely vulgar and greedy brutes, but he seemed by some more complex intention. He would rob a man as if only to demonstrate his poor opinion of the creature...Later on he ran off - it was reported - with the wife of a missionary, a very young girl from Clapham way, who had married the mild, flat-footed fellow in a moment of enthusiasm, and suddenly transplanted to Melanesia, lost her bearings somehow. It was a dark story. She was ill at the time he carried her off, and died on board his ship. It is said - as the most wonderful part of the tale - that over her body he gave way to an outburst of sombre and violent grief...till at last, he sails into Jim's history, a blind accomplice of the dark powers.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1065: ...most unexpectedly I did come upon him a few hours before he gave up his arrogant ghost. Fortunately he was willing and able to talk between the choking fits of asthma, and his racked body writherd with malicious exultation at the bare thought of Jim. He exulted thus at the idea that he had "paid out the stuck-up beggar after all". He gloated over his action. I had to bear the sunken glare of his fierce crow-footed eyes if I wanted to know; and so I bore it, reflecting how much certain forms of evil are akin to madness, derived from intense egoism, inflamed by resistance, tearing the soul to pieces...
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1067: It appears that a sort of loafing, fuddled vagabond - a white man living among the natives with a siamese woman - had consireded it a great privilege to give a shelter to the last days of the famous Gentleman Brown. While he was talking to me in the wretched hovel, and, as it were, fighting for every minute of his life, the siamese woman, with big bare legs nd a stupid coarse face, sat in dark orner chewing betel stolidly. Now and then she would get up for the purpose of shooing a chicken away from the door. The whole hut shook when she walked. An ugly yellow child, naked and pot-bellied, like a little heathen god, stood at the foot of the couch, finger in mouth, lost in a profound and calm contemplation of the dying man.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1071: I could see directly I set my eyes on him what sort of a fool he was, gasped the dying Brown. He a man! Hell! He was a hollow sham. As if he couldn't have said straight out, Hands off my plunder! blast him. That would have been like a man! Rot his superiour soul! He had me there - but he hadn't devil enough in him to make and en of me. Not he! A thng like that letting me off as if I wasn't worth a kick!... Brown struggled desperately for breath... Fraud ... letting me off ... and so I did make an end of him after all... He choked again...

    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1123: >>> Who told you I was crazy which started this whole thing.
    xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1212: or death by a heartache over this eventually,
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 305: At the weekend seminar, I couldn’t shake the feeling that what we were participating in was thinly-veiled self-indulgence and little more. In hindsight, I think this was as much a branding problem (from a business perspective) as an organizational problem (social perspective). Integral Institute built their movement in order to influence academia, governmental policy, to get books and journals published, and to infuse these ideas into the world at large. Yet, here we were, spending money to sit in a room performing various forms of meditation and yoga, having group therapy sessions, art performances, and generally going on and on about how “integral” we were and how important we were to the world without seemingly doing anything on a larger scale about it.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 307: If you want to be a self-development seminar and motivate people, then be a self-development seminar and motivate people. If you want to be a formal institute and have serious effects on policy and academia, then do that. Don’t half-ass both and muddy them with gratuitous talks and performances. The irony in all of this was that Wilber’s integral framework applied to organizations and business and should have accounted for these branding issues, but didn’t. The ironies would soon continue to mount.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 309: Wilber’s eventual response to many of these critics was nothing short of childish — a dozen-or-so page (albeit extremely well-written) verbal shit storm that clarified nothing, justified nothing, personally attacked everyone, and straw-manned the shit out of his critics’ claims.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 310: For many, that was the day the intellectual giant fell, the evolution stopped, the so-called “Einstein of consciousness” took his ball and went home.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 312: The seminars slowed to a crawl. Wilber’s health deteriorated greatly (he was diagnosed with a rare disease that keeps him bed-ridden). He stopped writing. Ten years on, despite developing some fans in academia (some in high places), Wilber’s work had yet to be tested or peer-reviewed in a serious journal. Much of his posting online devolved into bizarre spiritual claims (such as this one about an “enlightened teacher” who can make crops grow twice as fast by “blessing them”).
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 331: Kuuset on suomettuneita aatelisia, entisiä Granfeltejä. Fennomaanin muttei dipsomaanin Granfeltin viisi aikamiespoikaa otti nimen Kuusi. Toisella puolen tietä oli 1 Granfelt ja toisella kuusi. Mytomaani Matti oli Pauli Pylkkäsen luokkatoveri, ne kaxi oli ihan viimeisinä hengissä niiden luokalta. Matti oli AKS:än miehiä. Matin veli Pekka oli vasemmistolaisempi Alkon pääjohtaja. Norssissa Kuusia oli tukkikuormittain. Matin poika Osmo oli jonkinlainen tulevaisuudentutkija, veli Syvällisen huuhailukumppani. Nyt on tulevaisuus täällä, ellei oo jo mennyttä. En tiennytkään että Matin sisko Maija oli joutunut opettajaxi Hyvinkäälle, kouluttamaan ystäväämme kultahattua. Se että historia kulkee eteenpäin joidenkin valopäiden voimasta, on ihan huttua. Pikemminkin on niinpäin, että aina kun joku sota on desimoinut jonkun pikkukansan, pikku nilkeistäkin pääsee kasvamaan siellä suurmiehiä. Tilaisuus tekee varkaan, ei varkaat tilaisuuxia.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 333: Virpi ja Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila: Rakkauden atlas, Otava 2005. "Olemme kirjoittaneet tämän kirjan eräänlaiseksi rakkauden kulttuurihistorian atlakseksi, karttakirjaksi, josta näkyy, millaisin silmin muut vaeltajat ovat katselleet näitä maisemia." Sympaattinen, ymmärtäväväinen, lämmin ja laajakatseinen kirja, joka esittelee ihanan soljuvasti rakkauden kuvastoja lännessä ja idässä. Perustuu tekijärakastavaisten poikkeuksellisen suureen lukeneisuuteen ja inhimilliseen ymmärrykseen. Kansainvälsien tason huipputeos, uhkea myös ulkoisessa toteutuksessaan ja kuvituksessaan. Tekijät edustavat sitä harvinaista taitoa, jossa opillinen sivistys ja sydämen sivistys kulkevat käsi kädessä ja inspiroivat kaiken aikaa toisiaan.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 335: Mm, mitkä maisemat! sanoo el Zorron roistot kaivettuaan neitosen maitomunat esille. Hämeen-Anttilat (nää Lahden Andelinit on tulleet vastaan ennenkin) hellinevät vielä toisiaan, pysyttelevät erotiikan kartalla, näissä kuvissa, näissä tunnelmissa, vaikka vaan näköpuhelimen kautta nyt, kun pyylevä ja pörheä islamisti pikkumies on maanpaossa Edinburghissa ja uus-Hietamies jäi tänne nälkämaalle soittelemaan kodin kuvalehdellä.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 337: Lenita Airisto: Kauneus on lisäarvo, Otava 2004 Lenitan uusi suurtyö. Jos luulet tuntevasi tämän kirjailijan, erehdyt. Tai lähihistoriaakaan. Kauneus on lisäarvo, mutta se myös kätkee. Tämä kirja osoittaa, mitä kätköistä avautuu kun vähän katsoo, kun katsoo Suomea ja maailmaa yhden voimanaisen silmin, kokemuksin ja tosissaan.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 351: Eski oli yliopiston älykkäimpiä miehiä oman ilmoituxensa mukaan, joten sen oli helppo olla yliopistolla älykkäästi hullu. Paizi paha empire iski takaisin ja piti sitä epäpätevänä oman alma materin filosofian professuuriin. Kateet puukottivat selkään ainoalla käsiin sattuneella tylsällä astalolla. (Niini on sevverran laupias ettei mainize koko jupakkaa Eski-historiikissaan.) Iltalehdissä juoxi siitä lööpit kissankokoisina. Omat lehmät purivat. Myöhemmin nuori polvi löysi terävämpää kättä pitempää ja iski etupuolelta. Nahkatakkiin tuli etuviilloke. Hyvä että jalommat ruumiinosat säilyivät.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 362: Jonkinlaista historian viekkautta voi nähdä siinä, että ”kapinaa systeemiä vastaan” lietsonut punktohtori löysi tiensä juuri Systeemianalyysin laboratorioon. Leukavasti laukaistu, kyllä Niininkin luoti löytää tarpeen tullen maalinsa, osuu Sven Tuuvaa pehmeimpään kohtaan (ei sentään sydämeen).
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 404: Kasvun ihme, mon oeil! Ihme kasvuräjähdyxen saarnaaja. Ja hengen ankara laulu, my foot. Mistäs se nyt oli nyysitty. Ainiin Eikka Leikalta: "Yksi on laulu ylitse muiden: ihmisen, aattehen, hengen ankara laulu. Kansat katoo, ei katoa mahti, jonka on laulanut mahtaja kansansa sielun." Sanoi Eikka tarkoittaen izeään. Toistaa Eski papukaijamaisesti tarkoittaen ketäs muuta kuin taas izeään. Sillä on se äänikirjana kai Vessa-Matti Ploirin laulamana, toimii autossa mahtavasti. Noita ankaria laulajia piisaa. HENGEN ANKARA LAULU VELVOITTAA OLEMAAN TYÖTELIÄS JA VAHVA TILAAJILLE. Puolesta hengen ja heimon ja maan. Vitun veisaajat. Isa Gripenberg, 79, puhelee puoliääneen izelleen: Tässä on Mannerheimin kirje apelleni. Miehisiä naisia, naismaisia miehiä salaa tissiliiveissä. Keskiluokan tunnejohtaja, johtoportaan perässäjuoxija. Eski johtaa edestä, takaa vuorineuvoxet. Nörttismurffi esittää, pappasmurffit vetää kulisseissa langoista. Valesmurffi ja muita smurffijuttuja.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 408: Miehiset miehet ja naiset, hei:

    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 443: The man with learning does not thrive by mindless toil; his is a harder way.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 490: "Jos olisin tajunnut että filosofia tarkoittaa juuri oman elämäntapojen, elämän laadun, ajattelun ja mallien kehittämistä, olisin varmasti perehtynyt siihen jo huomattavasti aikaisemmin." Kauhistus. Jos filosofia 70-luvulla olisi ollut tälläistä, olisin varmasti äänestänyt jaloillani. Muutaman luentokerran jälkeen oisin väsynyt ja lopettanut kurssin käymisen, pitäen sisältöä haihattelevana ja jopa huuhaana. Onnexi Jaakko ei ollut silloin vielä tavannut kotkaansa eikä Eski Pipsaa. Pysyttiin asialinjalla.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 513: Esipuheessaan kirjaansa Filosofian historia huipulta huipulla Esa kysyy, onko mitään masentavampaa kuin perinne, ja miksi siis pitäisi kirjoittaa kirja filosofiasta sen perinteen näkökulmasta. Eikö olisi parempi haastaa perinne ja sanoa jotain ihan uutta? Sanoo se ja alkaa sitten luetella perinteisiä filosofian taivaan kiintotähtiä, suurimpia alan julkkixia. Yx sen oppilaista muistaa enää kaxi periaatetta.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 563: Koko modernin organisaatiotutkimuksen lyhyen historian ajan on etsitty keinoja saada ihmiset tehokkaammin toteuttamaan organisaation tavoitteita, jotka yksioikoisimmissa tulkinnoissa kiteytyvät tuloksen tekemiseksi tai voiton maksimoinniksi. Saarisen mukaan tämä ei ole paras lähtökohta. Fiksumpaa olisi asettaa kaiken toiminnan keskiöön ihminen ja luoda ”ihmisten yhteisö ihmisiä varten”.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 671: Ehkä vielä merkittävämpää saattaa olla se, että puhuja uskaltaa näyttää omat tunteensa ja jopa liikuttua puheensa aikana, aidolla tavalla. Vanhat puhujamestarit ovat aina ymmärtäneet tunneviestinnän dramaattisen tärkeän merkityksen. Pikku julkinen pirautus sotaveteraanien tai Pipsan punaisten tissiliivien päälle on aina paikallaan, ei koskaan pois tieltä. Minkä tahansa Youtubesta etsityn historiallisen puheen vireenä on varsinainen paatostelu. Sama mitä sanoo, ei ne sitä ymmärrä kumminkaan, pitää vaan muistaa heittää noita tuttuja attrappisanoja ja paatostella päälle.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 756: Ja paskat. Vastakysymys: oletteko nähneet koskaan James Bondia paskalla? Ette ole. Se nyt ei vaan kuulu sen imidzhiin. Kyllä se silti pakosta paskantaa, kerta syökin joka filmissä. Se käy vaan kiekuralla kuvausten välillä. Ja turhautuukin kuvan ulkopuolella. Varmasti Eskikin marisee ja rähisee kotioloissa. Positiivista on vaan että se on aika hiljaa siitä. Ei kai se mikään Jeesus sentään ole. (Jeesuskin sai paskahalvauxen kun temppeli oli pahassa siivossa. Eski repi pelihousunsa kun sai paskakaivoarvosanan gradusta.)
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 809: Pariutumisrituaaliin kuului "häälento" pesän lähistölle, jos uudelta kuningattarelta leikattiin siivet ennen lentoonlähtöä, koodi sekosi ja mitään ei tapahtunut. Eli uutta yhdyskuntaa ei muodostunu. Jos taas uuden kuningattaren annettiin lentää vaikka kuinka pieni matka ulos pesästä, uusi yhdyskunta rakantui. Niin tiukassa on tässä tapauksessa "koodi".
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 929: Engagement on kihloissa, varattu (puhelimesta), tai (vaihderattaasta) päällä eikä vapaalla. Varmaan Eski jahtaa eniten tota ratasvertausta. Se on mielekkäin myös työnantajien kannalta, onhan se hyvä jos rattaat pyörivät eikä seiso vapaalla, ei luistateta kytkintä. Siis pöhistään, ollaan puuhakkaita, mukana menossa. Tästä mä en liioin ole koskaan tykännyt, mä puuhastelen mieluummin izexeni omaan tahtiin, en kytke izeäni mihkään virtapiireihin. Pöhinäkin on eräänlaista kytkyeessä olemista, silat päällä valjakossa, joku brändimerkki ozassa ja rähinäremmi olalla. Kiitti, mut ei kiitti, me, siis minä ja Lauri, inhotaan pöhinää kuin Turtsel pizzaa. (Pizzakin on pahaa.)
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 933: No sit on jälellä tää uutuus, elevaatio. Ensimmäinen assosiaatio on Viron korkein vuori, pikku kohouma, korkeudeltaan samaa luokkaa kuin Taivaskallio. Toinen on elevaattori, sellainen nosturi kun on viljasiiloissa, ja kolmas Stockmannin liukuportaikko. Amerikkalaiset kuzuu kaikkia hissejä elevaattoreix. Siellähän niitä piisaa herrahissejä. Kone Oy muuten on yx Eskin asiakkaita. Ei mennyt koneelta ihan putkeen saxalaisen hissifirman osto, loppui käteiset. Koneelta tuli myös se ruokalähettien mamupiiskuri. Ylöspäin ne kaikki yrittää, Eskin opeilla ja ilmankin.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 954: The participant is approached with respect, handed a bulk cut flower with a kiss or handshake depending on gender, and treated as a miraculous (if suspect) specimen of life. (I realize the romanticism of this way of speaking, but that’s the way I think, and it works. Everybody buys it hook, line, and sinker.) Whether a clown or a king, the participant is assumed to possess potential that nobody can quite name. (Not before nor after the treatment. But that is not the point.)
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 970: Think about the participation in the Paphos seminar as an opportunity to play in in a band, like Eski´s heavy gentlemen. The conductor a true maestro, and the audience hopefully generous. The conductor leads the collection of offertory as well as the musicians, and facilitates the lucrative process. It would be naïve to assume that the concert is chiefly for the conductor’s recreation, or that anything but a straightforward cost-and-benefit logic applies. Buzzwords that go with this orchestra metaphor are presents, merchandise, prices, trust, pretext, merry tunes, procreation and contention. In god we trust, all others pay cash.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 995: Tää Jeffersonläppä on mulle liian talousliberaalia. Ei ensinnäkään ole yhtään izestään evidenttiä totuutta (en tarkoita todellisuutta, joka pitää huolen izestään vaikkei olis yhtään apinaa sitä tihrustamassa), on vaan eri elukoiden kantoja. Kukaan ei oo luonu meitä, me ollaaan vaan sihisty tänne synnissä kuin pikku matoset ilman mitään isolla kirjoitettua pelinrakentajaa. Kaikki nk. oikeudet voi tulla otetuxi pois, koska on vaan vahvemman oikeutta, jotkut on win-win ja toiset luusereita. Vapaudesta voi puhua vaan jos saa olla jotenkin rauhassa, isossa jengissä vapaus on vaan valtaa toisten ylize. Ja toi pursuit of happiness on taas sitä seppoilua, se on tosi paha asia; koska onni on differentiaali, niin se on just sama kuin tavais sanan kasvuräjähdys.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1011: I have gone to psychoanalysis for 10 years four times a week. While acknowledging the merits of that experience, I reflect the week in Paphos with astonishment. Comparing the prices, this was a steal, both ways.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1052: In actual practice, much of academic philosophy is elitist and assumes a pretence of knowledge (somewhat like economics, as described by Hayek in his towering Nobel speech). I find much of academic philosophy fear-based as it seeks to pinpoint mistakes and operates with conceptual criticism as the leading faculty of mind. The result is the lack of synthetic, life-enhancing contributions (a point made clear in Gardner’s Five Minds for the Future).
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1071: Jeesus alko loistamaan vasta kuoltuaan, helluntaipäivänä. Se oli selkeesti fixu ja osas raamatun (siis vanhan testamentin, uus oli vasta in preparation). Se nousi kyllä yläilmoihin loppupeleissä, ensin Pilatuxen sotilaitten toimesta ja sit isän hississä, mut ei se muuten mitenkään doppaillut, söi publikaanien pöydässä. Eskikään ei kaihda liikkenjohtajia eikä niiden tarjoomia lounaita. Jormaa, minä seison mistelin alla! lirkutteli Nokialla. Jeesuxen jutut kelpas tavalliselle rahvaalle, sekin puhui kertomalla vertauskuvia ja nuhtelemalla fariseuxia. Niille se ei ollut nöyrä, vaikka muuten hyvinkin.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1309: Filosofian ydin vaikeni todenteolla vasta hänen kirjoitettuaan väitöksensä. Sain stipendin Pittsburghin yliopistoon, jossa oli maailman loistavin tieteen­filosofian keskus – ennen mun tuloa. Sain viettää siellä kaikkiaan kolmisen vuotta ennenkuin ne heitti ulos, ja silloin mä siirryin tähän etiikkaan, taas 1 porras alemmas. 1. palkinto viikko Pittsburghissa 2. palkinto 2 viikkoa.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 55: Julkkixista, suurmiehistä ja taiteilijoista narsisseja kanzii eziä.

    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 323: Joseph Burgo is a lying, cheating, scammer who has no business being a psychologist. Based on his actions, he is probably a psychopath himself. He will never admit this because he is narcissistic to the extreme. The state of California should take away his license.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 346: Stalinismin ajan äkkiväärä kirjastonhoitaja, "Käpy selän alla" Marja-Leena Mikkola, os.Pirinen, ent. Salmi, joka on suomentanut Anna Ahmatovan, Osip Mandelštamin, Boris Pasternakin, Sylvia Plathin, Dylan Thomasin ja William Shakespearen runoja sekä muun muassa italialaista proosaa, ei liene ihan lähisukua. Se on varmaan väkivaltainen, alkukantaisten vaistojen ohjaama. Se ei ollut mikään kaunotar, pikemminkin päinvastoin, toisin kuin Aulikki Oxanen, joka on kuin ilmetty Liisa Koistinen.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 348: 1920-luvun lopulla Talviolle alkoi uusi luomiskausi, jolloin hän keskittyi historiallisiin romaaneihin. Niitä olivat vuosina 1929–1935 julkaistu Helsingin historiaan liittyvä romaanitrilogia Itämeren tytär sekä hänen viimeinen romaaninsa Linnoituksen iloiset rouvat (1941) jossa tapahtumaympäristönä oli Suomen sodan aikainen Viaporin linnoitus. Talvio testamenttasi tuotantonsa tekijänoikeudet Helsingin yliopiston Satakuntalaiselle Osakunnalle, jonka inspehtorinä hänen puolisonsa J. J. Mikkola toimi pitkään.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 410: Hess joined the NSDAP on 1 July 1920 and was at Hitler's side on 8 November 1923 for the Beer Hall Putsch, a failed Nazi attempt to seize control of the government of Bavaria. While serving time in jail for this attempted coup, he assisted Hitler with Mein Kampf, which became a foundation of the political platform of the NSDAP.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 412: He was taken prisoner and eventually convicted of crimes against peace, serving a life sentence until his suicide in 1987. While still in custody in Spandau, he died by hanging himself in 1987 at the age of 93. After his death, the prison was demolished to prevent it from becoming a neo-Nazi shrine.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 420: 1961 Hermanni sai flunssan, joka osoittautui leukemiaxi. '62 sen tappoi schlaagi 85-vuotiaana. Monissa kirjoissa sillä on oppipoika ja mestari. Kukas se mestari oli? Oisko se ollut toi pastori Blumhardt joka johatteli sitä teini-iän kriisissä? Blumhartista tuli sossu. Vai oliko Hermanni ize molempia? Hmm. Hipit tykkäsivät Hessestä, ja muut teini-ikäiset. Hessellä se näyttäisikin olleen pitkä. Siis teini-ikä. Jotain samaa sen henkilöhistoriassa on kuin Kanilla (Paulo Coelho).
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 424: stages of the journey to self-realization are the various chapters. This is the
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 429: Sinclair identify himself, and in each does he recognize an aspect of his own
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 443: Pistorius as a man who presents mythology only from the historical point of
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 447: with his fate. Pistorius, in the final analysis, is not creative, therefore he
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 449: letter to Mr. Maier (Refer to Introduction) reiterates this viewpoint in a pithier way. (Lähde: maler.pdf)
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 755: Frederick Emanuel Austerlitzin äiti oli on Johanna Geilus (1878–1975) lähde? ja isä Frederic Austerlitz. Johanna-äiti oli syntynyt Yhdysvalloissa saksalaiseen luterilaiseen perheeseen, joka oli muuttanut Itä-Preussista ja Elsassista Yhdysvaltoihin. Isä Frederic oli syntynyt Linzissä Itävallassa juutalaiseen perheeseen, joka oli kääntynyt roomalaiskatolilaisuuteen. Isä Frederic oli muuttanut lapsena 1893 New Yorkiin Ellis Islandin kautta. Sukunimi Austerlitz muutettiin Astaireksi, kun Fred oli vielä nuori.
    Fred eli vielä vanhemmaxi kuin Voltaire, 88v. Laulutaito on siis preussilais-juutalaista perua, hyvä ettei jäänyt vanhaan maahan kaasuntumaan. Maria Teresian alamainen ja der alte Fritzin kaima. Austerlitzissä pani Napsu päihin Tessulle ja Alexanterille. Pettyneenä Alex otiti sitten Sumen Ruozilta. Loppukin on historiaa.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 770: Voltaire lähti koulusta 17-vuotiaana, se oli päättänyt tulla kirjailijaksi. Isänsä kuitenkin olisi halunnut poikansa opiskelevan lakia. (Huoh, taas yxi, että näitä piisaa.) Voltaire teeskenteli työskentelevänsä Pariisissa lakimiehen apulaisena, mutta käytti suurimman osan ajastaan kirjoittaen satiirista runoutta. Kun isä sai tän selville, se luki pojalle lakia ja lähetti sen uudelleen lukemaan lakia, tällä kertaa provinsseihin. Voltaire kuitenkin jatkoi kirjoittamista, tuottaen esseitä ja historiallisia tutkielmia, jotka eivät aina olleet historiallisesti paikkansapitäviä. Tää ja Voltairen terävä äly teki hänestä suositun aatelispiireissä. Kunnes pääsi yxi läppä liikaa, kunkku sanoi "tuo ei ollut enää hauskaa" ja lukizi sen bastiljiin.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 943: Så dikterade Bertel och åt apelsinklyftor medan Wexi Antero översatt snilleblixterna till finska. Izekin ois osannut, Bertel puhui pellon reunalla 6 dagar viikossa hoono soomi ja 1 dålig svenska. Såsom farbror Oscar. Toi vapaamittainen käännös on kai Kai Laitisen kirjallisuudenhistoriasta. Kai oli kääntänyt vilddjurens sanaxi villipedon yxiköllä, ei sekään savolaisena kovin hyvin osannut ruozia. Vääräleuka koulukiusaaja. Vähän piti tuotakin sitten korjata. Aale Tynnikin sminkkas muilta lainaamiaan runokäännöxiä omalla kulmakynällä. Sarkian humaltuneesta venheestä tuli laiva. Meikit on poistettu uudessa painoxessa.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 991: Ja soittaakin. Apua! musta mies ahistaa!

    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1207: Rajneesh (born Chandra Mohan Jain, 11 December 1931 – 19 January 1990), also known as Acharya Rajneesh, Bhagwan Shri Rajneesh, and later as Osho (/ˈoʊʃoʊ/), was an Indian godman, mystic and founder of the Rajneesh movement. During his lifetime he was viewed as a controversial new religious movement leader and mystic. His parents, Babulal and Saraswati Jain, who were Taranpanthi Jains, let him live with his maternal grandparents until he was seven years old. By Rajneesh's own account, this was a major influence on his development because his grandmother gave him the utmost freedom, leaving him carefree without an imposed education or restrictions. In the 1960s he travelled throughout India as a public speaker and was a vocal critic of socialism, arguing that India was not ready for socialism and that socialism, communism, and anarchism could evolve only when capitalism had reached its maturity. He caused controversy in India during the late 1960s and became known as "the sex guru". Kun Intia kävi kuumaxi se siirsi bisnisit Oregoniin. Lopulta se potkittiin pois sieltäkin ja palautettiin Intiaan. Aiivan läpi paska äijä.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1211: Sathya Sai Baba's materialisations of vibhuti (holy ash) and other small objects such as rings, necklaces, and watches were a source of controversy for the agnostics and non believers. Some have analyzed them as being mere sleights of hand, while his followers have considered them as signs of his divinity. Ali Baba förbii enemmän kuin 40 rosvoa.


    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1212: His birth was alleged by his mother Easwaramma to be of a miraculous conception. Sathya Sai Baba's siblings included elder brother, sisters, and younger brother.
    Nää tuli kaiketi ihan luonnonmenetelmällä kuten Jeesuxenkin sisaruxet. Epätavallisempaa on et tahraton siitto tuli tällä kertaa fläkkisten väliin.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1214: As a child, he was described as "unusually intelligent" and charitable, though not necessarily academically inclined, as his interests were of a more spiritual nature. He was uncommonly talented in devotional music, dance and drama. From a young age, he has been alleged to have been capable of materialising objects such as food and sweets out of thin air. Olikohan sillä huonot hampaat. Iskä oli sille hirmu vihainen, ehkä syystä. Äitikin oli käväissyt salaa hunajapurkilla. Babaa pisti skorpioni ja se alkoi puhua sanskriittiä. Babar oli ennustanut kuolevansa 96v terveenä kuin pukki. Se kuolikin 84v kun tuoli kaatui sen päälle. Jälkeenpäin selitettiin et se oli tarkoittanut kuukalenterivuosia. Se ei yrittänyt USAaan, teki vaan jonkun lomamatkan Ugandaan.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1216: Accusations against Sai Baba by his critics over the years have included sleight of hand, sexual abuse, money laundering, fraud in the performance of service projects, and murder. In the article Divine Windfall, published in the Daily Telegraph, Anil Kumar, the ex-principal of the Sathya Sai Educational Institute, said that he believed that the controversy was part of Sathya Sai Baba's divine plan and that all great religious teachers had to face criticism during their lives. :D Joo mä tiedän Baba sanoi syytteisiin, mulla on vitusti enemmän juudaxia kuin Jeesuxella.
    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1232: ize eläintalouskysymyxestä. Mihis oikein pyrit Burgeri?


    xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1251: Onko narsisseja enemmän miehissä kuin naisissa?

    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 42: Keväällä 2022 Ukrainan selkkauxen aikana löytyi Häpylän lainaston poistohyllystä alkuperäisteos Five go off to concentration camp, jonka kannessa Georgina kazoo ahdistuneena kun Dickin aavejuna syöxyy pimeään tunneliin. Siitä selvisi, että loppuvizeissä Timmy the dog thumped his tail hard on the ground. Julian, Dick, George and Ann laughed hard and Dick thumped his dick happily into Georgina's tail.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 89: Manninen asuu Mänzälän Jokelanseudulla ja on kirjoittanut paikkakunnan historiikin. Historia ei ole tilkkutäkki vaan räsymatto, jonka raitoihin on kudottu taitavasti leikattuja suikaleita menneisyydestä. Henkilöt ja heidän tarinansa ovat kuitenkin aina pääosassa. Tunnustuxia ja palkintoja:
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 106: Ovatko Mannisen ja Raivion dekkarit Sinulle tuttuja? Mitä muita historiallisia dekkareita suosittelisit?
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 110: Yhdessä luodun rungon mukaan kirjoitimme luvut kerrallaan siten että Jouko kirjoitti Johanneksen, minä Matildan luvut, mutta ennen oman lukunsa aloittamista toinen aina muokkasi toisen tekstiä. Minun tekstini lyhenivät, kun Jouko karsi kuvauksia ja adjektiiveja, hänen tekstinsä pitenivät, kun lisäsin niihin historian havinaa, makuja ja tuoksuja.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 224: Dickens ize syntyi Landportissa lähellä Portsmouthia 1812. Se oli 2. 8 lapsesta. Sen isä John (joka siis muistutti Mr. Micawberia) oli laivaston palkkatoimistossa kirjurina. Dickensit ei olleet suorastaan köyhiä, mutta aina rahapulassa. Lapsuus meni Portmouthissa, Lontoossa ja Kentin Chathamissa, missä oli laivastolla iso telakka. 1823 rahat oli loppu ja perhe muutti Lontooseen. Isä oli joutunut velkavankeuteen ja perhe asettui posen naapuriin. (Tästä kertoo Pickwickin paperit.) 1824 Charles meni töihin kenkämustetehtaaseen liimaamaan etikettejä kiillokepulloihin.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 425:

    Toi hyeenameemi oli von Schillerin kauhistunutta schilderungia Ranskan vallankumouxesta:
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 519: Kant käytti hiljaisen vuosikymmenensä pohtien ratkaisua esitettyyn ongelmaan. Kun hän lopetti hiljaisuuden toukokuussa 1781, hänen vastauksensa oli Puhtaan järjen kritiikki. Vaikka Kritiikki on nykyään eräs filosofian historian kuuluisimmista teoksista, siitä ei välitetty juuri lainkaan sen ensimmäisellä julkaisukerralla. Kirja oli pitkä, alkuperäisenä saksankielisenä painoksena yli 800 sivua, ja se oli kirjoitettu kuivalla koulufilosofisella tyylillä. Se sai vain muutamia arvosteluja, ensimmäisen ilmestyessä vasta tammikuussa 1782, eivätkä arvostelijat ymmärtäneet Kritiikin vallankumouksellista luonnetta. Kant pettyi teoksen saamaan vastaanottoon. Hän kuitenkin ymmärsi teoksen epäselvyyden ja kirjoitti teoksen Prolegomena, joka teki yhteenvedon Kritiikin pääkohdista.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 527: Moses Mendelssohn oli tunnetun säveltäjän Felix Mendelssohnin isoisä. Moses Mendelssohn (6. syyskuuta 1729 Dessau – 4. tammikuuta 1786 Berliini) oli saksalainen juutalainen filosofi. Hän oli 1700-luvun merkittävimpiä juutalaisia ja hänen voidaan katsoa synnyttäneen euroopan juutalaisen valistuksen, haskalahin. Hänen tärkein juutalaisuutta käsittelevä teoksensa Jerusalem, eli uskonnollisesta vallasta ja juutalaisuudesta julkaistiin vuonna 1783. Jotkut juutalaiset ovat pitäneet Mendelssohnia kolmantena Mooseksena, jonka kautta juutalaisille on avautunut uusi suunta historiassa, raamatullisen Mooseksen ja keskiajalla vaikuttaneen Moses Maimonideen jälkeen. Toiset taas ovat nähneet hänet juutalaisten oman identiteetin ja perinteisen juutalaisuuden tuhoutumisen alullepanijana. Kaikkia ei voi miellyttää. Sen rouva oli Fromet Guggenheim.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 532: Cunt innostui suosiosta niin että kirjoitti lisää kritiikkejä vähän joka aiheesta. Kantissa oli ainesta kriitikoxi. Hän kirjoitti myös joukon osittain yleistajuistettuja esseitä historiasta, uskonnosta, politiikasta ja muista aiheista. Nämä teokset saivat Kantin aikalaisilta hyvän vastaanoton ja takasivat hänen keskeisen asemansa 1700-luvun filosofiassa. Tuohon aikaan ilmestyi useita aikakausjulkaisuja, jotka oli tarkoitettu pelkästään kantilaisen filosofian puolustamiseen ja arvosteluun.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 576: Nach einem kurzen Intermezzo auf einer Hauslehrerstelle in Warschau nahm Fichte Anfang November 1791 eine auf ein Jahr befristete Anstellung als Hauslehrer des Sohns des Ehepaars Louise von Krockow, geb. von Göppel, die mit Kant persönlich bekannt war, und Heinrich Joachim Reinhold von Krockow (1736–1796), Königl. Preußischer Obrist, im gräflichen Schloss Krockow in der Nähe der pommerellischen Ostseeküste an. Im selben Jahr besuchte er Kant in Königsberg, wo dieser ihm einen Verleger für seine Schrift Versuch einer Critik aller Offenbarung (1792) verschaffte, die anonym veröffentlicht wurde. Das Buch galt zunächst als ein lange erwartetes religionsphilosophisches Werk von Kant selbst. Als Kant den Irrtum klarstellte, war Fichte berühmt und erhielt einen Lehrstuhl für Philosophie an der Universität Jena, den er 1794 antrat. Zuvor hatte er nach längerer Überlegung, ob eine Eheschließung ihm nicht die „Flügel abschneide“, 1793 Johanna Rahn geheiratet. Drei Jahre später kam Sohn Immanuel Hermann (1796–1879) zur Welt.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 588: Olixe niin et Hegel sai Fichteltä historian epookit, ja Marx sitten Hegeliltä, vaikka käänsi syyn (geenit) ja seurauxen (meemit) toisin päin.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 604: Schellingin ajattelussa ilmeni eri kehitysasteita. Teoksessaan Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur (1797) hän esitti panteistista luonnonfilosofiaa. Myöhemmin hän asettui (Darstellung meines Systems, ym.) Spinozaa lähentelevälle niin sanotun identiteettifilosofian kannalle, jonka mukaan henki ja luonto ovat identtiset jumalallisessa kaikkiyhteydessä. Lopulta hän päätyi (Philosophie und Religion, Philosophische Untersuchungen über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit ym.) mystillis-uskonnolliseen mietiskelyyn. Sekö siis oli kehityxen huippua? Aika lässähdys. Mahalasku suorastaan.
    xxx/ellauri056.html on line 643: Marian äiti tuli uskoon kun Maria oli 2-vuotias. Äidin kautta taivaan iskä tuli tutuxi Mariallekin. Olihan siinä välillä sellasta tuuliajoa, mut fifteen-leirillä kohtasin jumalan uudelleen ja sain vahvan uskon. Jalkapallo oli mennyt jumalan edelle, eikä niin saa olla. Jumalan pitää mennä jalkapallon edelle. En ole loukkaantumisesta sille lainkaan loukkaantunut. Asia on jälleen kunnossa, jumala ykkösenä pallo perässä. Taivaan iskälle voi kertoa ihan kaiken eikä se koskaan rähise. Se luo turvaa kun on joku ylempi.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 151: Niin... Jethro on just niitä, jotka ovat julkisuudessa siitä syystä, että ovat julkisuudessa. Kun on ollu tarpeex kauan julkisuudessa, voi perustaa ravintolan, jonne asiakkaat saapuvat siinä toivossa, että tapaisivat julkisuuden henkilön. Siljo plee. Jethron history alko siitä, kun osallistui Hjalliksen Diiliin kilpailijana.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 198: Vizi Puovo on sitten mieltäkääntävä setämies. Tollanen varmaan oli poika-Pransukin. Ei mene katsomaan panemaansa lasta sairaana mutta on valmis kuulustelemaan sen äitiä muista miehistä. Naurettava aisankannattaja, wannabe kunniamurhaaja. Karhu tappaa edellisen poikueen päästäxeen pukille. Sorsa bylsii gängfäkättyä puolisoaan viimesex. Great sex.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 227: Hilja piti opiskelusta, opettajista ja koulutovereistaan ja menestyi tyttökoulussa hyvin. Kuulostaa ihan Laura Kolbelta teoxessa Suomen yläluokasta, johon se haluisi kovin kuulua. Muttei kuulu kovasta yrityxestä huolimatta. Tyttökoulun jälkeen hän siirtyi jatko-opistoon, jossa hän harrasti monenlaisia asioita. Hilja oli lahjakas: hän lauloi, kirjoitti, maalasi ja lausui hyvin. Jatko-opistossa hän luki myös ranskaa ja suoritti opettajan tutkinnon vuonna 1902. Kaksi vuotta jatko-opistossa opiskeltuaan Hilja alkoi valmistautua ylioppilaskirjoituksiin Suomalaisen yhteiskoulun yksityisoppilaana, koska jatko-opistossa ylioppilastutkintoa ei voinut suorittaa. Hän kirjoitti vuonna 1901 ylioppilaaksi ja sai tutkinnon arvosanaksi muutamaa pistettä vajaan kiitettävän. Hilja oli aina muutamaa pistettä vajaa. Viimeisenä kouluvuotenaan Hilja pohti elämänuraansa ja tulevaisuuttaan. Valinta oli vaikea, sillä Hiljaa kiinnostivat monet taiteenalat. Jatko-opistossa Hilja oli innostunut teatterista, ja hän suunnitteli vakavasti näyttelijättären uraa. Syksyllä 1902 Hilja kirjoittautui yliopistoon historiallis-filologiseen osastoon, mutta ei koskaan valmistunut. (Täh? Minnekäs see lääkärinura unohtui?)
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 468: Vaatii velka pannahisen:
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 822: Kriitikko: Eihän niiden kaa mitään tartte naimisiin mennä. Tai jotain tuumasta toimeen terrorismia. Päinvastoin biografin paikannäyttäjä joka näyttää taskulampulla roskaisia rappuja ymmärtää yleisöä paremmin miten niistä tuli sellasia, ilkeitä. Putosivat siniseen värisammioon pienenä. kuten Turzelien pahis Shredder. Se et ymmärtää mix joku on pahis ei tee siitä hyvistä. Ite asiassa paikannäyttäjä on lukenut jo röykkiöittään kuuluisia kirjailijoita jotka oli ällöjä narsisseja. Fasistit menee siinä samassa.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 824: Knut Hamsun (Born: Knud Pedersen, August 4, 1859, Lom, Gudbrandsdalen, United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway, (present-day Lom, Norway) Died:February 19, 1952, Nørholm, Grimstad, Norway1859-1952) oli norjalainen kirjailija, joka lukeutuu tunnetuimpiin hahmoihin maansa kirjallisuuden historiassa. Hän sai Nobelin kirjallisuuspalkinnon vuonna 1920. Hamsun oli köyhän perheen poika, eikä hän käynyt koulua kuin runsaat 250 päivää. Sen kyllä huomaa.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 845: A hundred and one years ago, in 1917, Knut Hamsun published what was probably his most influential and at the same time most controversial novel: Markens grøde (translated into English as Growth of the Soil). This story about the colonization of new farmland in northern Norway (Hammarby, luulajansaamexi Hambra, mistä Knupo oli peräsin) by the pioneer Isak and his wife Inger attained immense popularity in Hamsun’s home country and abroad, and earned its author the Nobel Prize in literature. In later years, it has often been criticized for, among other things, postulated parallels to Nazi »blood and soil« ideology, for its racist and colonialist portrayal of the Sami, and for its antagonism towards female self-determination.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 852: Much has changed since the publication of Markens grøde. The planet’s human population has almost quadrupled, from fewer than two billion in 1917 to more than seven billion now, and is estimated to reach ten to eleven billion before the end of this century.10 Simultaneously, human-made changes to the Earth’s ecosystems and climate have reached an unprecedented scale. While levels of consumption vary greatly from one country to another and between different social classes, there can be no doubt that globally, the use of both renewable and non-renewable resources has risen immensely during the last hundred years. This development began, of course, long before 1917, with the Industrial Revolution constituting an important premise. However, it was not until after the end of the Second World War that the human transformation of the planet began to advance with such enormous speed that the time since then is now often referred to as the Great Acceleration.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 904: C'est mû par ses expériences que Georges Simenon simplifie radicalement son écriture et observe avec rigueur le fonctionnement de l'écriture commerciale selon les genres : littérature enfantine d'aventures et de combats, écrits de cœur pour midinettes, histoires sensuelles pour dactylos, drames effrayants pour concierges, historiettes de gare pour voyageurs, écrits érotiques ou licences pornographiques pour vrais hommes comme lui-meme ...
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 917: Pendant toute la guerre, entre 1940 et 1945, Simenon continue à vivre en Vendée et en Charente-Maritime, mais cette période, assez mal connue, est sujette à de multiples soupcons. Représentant de l'État belge auprès des Belges réfugiés, il refuse d'aider ceux d'entre eux qui sont juifs. Non seulement son frère fut volontaire auprès de la Waffen-SS Wallonie, mais de plus, selon certaines personnes, lors de cette période cruciale de sa vie et de son œuvre, l'écrivain aurait été un collaborateur, ou doucement dit, un peu "lâche". Il n'est pas revenu en Belgique, afin d'échapper au service militaire), un peu rusé et opportuniste, sans aucun sens de l'histoire avec un grand H. Il a commis d'« énormes imprudences » en écrivant dans des journaux contrôlés par les Allemands, mais Simenon ne dénonce pas, ne s'engage pas, ne fait pas de politique, seulement de la fiction. En fait, les accords qu'il a passés avec la firme cinématographique allemande Continental lui valent quelques tracas à la Libération. En 1944, une dépêche de l'AFP, retrouvée à Poitiers, mentionne sa dénonciation pour « intelligence avec l'ennemi » par « certains villageois vendéens exaspérés par la conduite égoïste de cet écrivain affichant l'opulence de son train de vie, à l'époque des tickets d'alimentation. »
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 983: Lao Rui: Oli muuten aika outo veto et eunukki edustais niinkö jotain Kaari Utrio genreä. Siis historiallista realismia.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 1023: Siitä puhe mistä puute. Jenkeissä pyllistellään jeesuxelle ja vedetään kättä maga-lippaan tähtilipun edessä ja pöyhistellään charity-gaaloissa. Just six että sieltä puuttuu tyystin solidaarisuus. Jos sun käy köpelösti se on oma vika pikku sika, mitäs läxit tumpeloimaan, tyhmä köyhä sairas mutiainen vanhus, etkä rikastunut ajoissa niin kuin me fixummat. USA pyrkii ihan intopiukeena kasvattamaan tuloeroja. Koko maa pyörii sen varassa. The American dream.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 1079: Wang Wei: Jos ei muuta, voi iiiiihmetellä, mitä kaikkea sai aikaan, julkaisi! Mieletön määrä kirja-arvosteluja, esseekokoelmat, historialliset romaanit. Kun luin sen hist. romaania Tiberius, tuli niin hirvee hinku suolakurkkuihin, että täyty käydä ostamassa.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 1258: Elina oli söpö pienenä mut vuodet säälimättä järsivät. Hämäriä maisemia hallitsee usein kuu, tai taustalla päilyy meren elmukelmu. Kuukuppi oli Elina Vaaran paljon käyttämä symboli, siinä missä aurinko Katri Valalla. Kuukuppi ahistaa, se on ”hellän sininen, lähellä ja silti saavuttamaton”. Hizi kai se Katri Vala täytyy kaivaa sitten esille. Kuusta tihruilee myös Toope Sillanpää.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 1296: Outoa ettei tätä kirjailijaa tuoda kunnolla esiin edes naiskirjallisuushistoriassa, jonne kelpaa tuhnummatkin kyhäyxet. Kuitenkin juuri kielen musiikillisuus on yksi naiskirjoituksen (écriture féminine) tunnusmerkkejä. Elimen tarkastelu feminiinisen kirjoituksen viitekehyksessä vaatii retostelua.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 1323: Keskeneräisyydestä, tietynasteisesta fragmentaarisuudesta Vaara itse sanoo näin: ”Tuntuu kuin luomisprosessia olisi edistänyt jopa tuo savukerasian pahvin tai paperilapun ahdas tila. Kenpä kaikesta ottaa selvän. – – Vaikeaa on myös sanoa asioita, joiden ilmaisua asialliset sanat juuri vaikeuttavatkin. – Mutta hyödyttääkö runon strep-tease, kun huntuja on niin monin kerroksin, etteivät ne ikinä lopu!”. Romantiikan nerokultti edusti miehistä luovuutta, naiskirjoitus toi tilalle toisen mytologian.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 1398: Nää eemeritat on siis ekojen Haavioiden tyttöjä. Aale Tynni teki pojan kirkkohistorian professori Kauko Piriselle mutta Maralle vaan lastenkirjoja. Poika Matti Antero Pirinen (15. kesäkuuta 1942 Helsinki – 20. helmikuuta 1971 Helsinki) oli suomalainen runoilija, joka kärsi mielenterveysongelmista ja teki 28-vuotiaana seppukun hyppäämällä perheensä entisen kotitalon katolta Helsingin Ullanlinnassa. Mistä talosta? Ois kiva tietää.
    xxx/ellauri057.html on line 1413: Lisää pensselinvetoa tulee Tatun historiallisissa romaaneissa, joista Sillinpää-biokaan ei paljon poikennut. Tatu näyttää kuumuvan erityisesti virttyneistä suurmiehistä. Ettei sittenkin ole vähän tollaista hinttipoikaa Tatussa? Elinakin sanoo Pyhän kevään johdannossa et se piti Kailasta joteskin sieluveljenä. Ja Tartussa oli kiva seukata professori Oraxen kaa. Ilmassa liiteli sellaisia nimiä kuin Shelley, Poe, Goethe, Manninen. Oras on kyllä salvukarju. Armfeltkin oli homo, bylsi Kustaa kolmatta. Vaaskivi myönsi myöhemmin et Armfeltissa kulkee omakohtaisen tilityxen salainen peruslanka. Olikohan se puuvillainen vyö. Puolivillainen ainaskin.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 205: Tää selvis Voima-lehden vapariliitteestä. Voima-lehti ei enää ole nuori. Siinä on ihan liikaa värikuvatuxia. On voimat vähissä.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 309: ”Äh, eivät sellaiset”, Airaksinen ähisee. ”Eikä riitä, että tuijottaa vanhoja suomifilmejä jalat pöydän päällä, se vain passivoi. Paljon tehokkaampaa on heittäytyä halujen valtaan, lähteä etsimään onnellisuutta ja elämän dynamiikkaa! Olen saanut tarpeekseni siitä viheliäisestä yninästä, että pieni on kaunista ja pieni elämä on hyvää.”
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 342: Shakespeare is not necessarily judging him for his religious belief but demonstrating intolerance in both religions. Shylock refuses to eat with the Christians:
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 346: Shylock is sticking to his bond and to his word. He is true to his own code of conduct. Antonio signed that bond and promised that money, Shylock has been wronged; he has had his money stolen from him by his daughter and Lorenzo. However, Shylock is offered three times his money back and he still demands his pound of flesh; this moves him into the realms of villainy.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 350: He is certainly left at the end of the play with very little to his name, although at least he is able to keep his property until his death. I think it would be difficult not to feel some sympathy for Shylock as all the goy characters celebrate at the end while he is all alone. It would be interesting to revisit Shylock in the years following and find out what he did next. Did he start to collect another big ball of thread.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 354: However, when we take into account circumstances that took place before the play, as well as what happens over the course of the plot, Shylock begins to seem a like a victim as well as a villain, and his fate seems excessively harsh. In addition to the abuse Antonio and other Christians routinely subject him to, Shylock lost his beloved wife, Leah. His daughter, Jessica, runs away from home with money and jewels she’s stolen from him, including a ring Leah gave him before she died. Although Solanio reports that Shylock’s was equally upset by the loss of his money as his daughter (“My daughter! O my ducats! O my daughter!” (II. Viii.), we must remember that we are getting a second-hand view through the eyes of an anti-Semitic character who compares Shylock to the devil. As we learn from Shylock himself, the Christians of Venice are happy to borrow money from him, but refuse to accept him as part of Venetian society because they equate his religion with Satan. Shylock has been treated as less than human his whole life, because he is not a Christian. Yet when he tries to collect on a loan, the other characters insist that he act like a Christian and forgive the debt.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 358: The stereotype of the Jew as a mean, dishonest money-grabbing individual has persisted, even into the twenty-first century. And Shakespeare has been accused of being anti-Semitic as a result of his portrayal of Shylock in that way in The Merchant of Venice.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 362: Shakespeare also gives us insight into the inner Shylock – not only his bitterness and anger but also his more sympathetic feelings such as the hurt he has experienced, his thoughts about the injustice of anti-Semitism and his isolation from normal society. Throughout the action of the play we see how nasty the Christians are – their shameless selfishness and brutal discrimination against Jews. Shakespeare makes Shylock’s hatred even more dramatic by having Shylock’s daughter elope with a Christian.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 366: One of the merchants, Antonio, is having a problem with his ships being late in returning to Venice. One of his friends, Basanio, asks him for money. He needs it to woo a wealthy woman and has no money himself but, if successful, and he marries Portia he will be able to pay it back very easily. Antonio’s money is all tied up in his business, which is in trouble and the only way he can help his friend is to borrow from a money-lender.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 368: He approaches Shylock and even while asking for help he is unforgivingly insulting to him. He tells him that his ships will be in the port in three days and then he will be able to pay. Shylock agrees to lend him the money. He says, just as a little gambling game, more or less as a little joke, if he isn’t repaid in three months Antonio should give him a pound of his flesh. Antonio agrees to that.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 370: The ships are lost in a storm and just at that time Shylock’s daughter, Jessica, runs off with a Christian, taking money and jewellery with her. Shylock, burning for revenge against the Christians generally, takes Antonio to court to claim his pound of flesh.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 372: The Duke doesn’t know how to deal with it but Basanio, successful in his suit, recruits his clever fiancé Portia, who is schooled in matters of law, to appear as a judge, disguised as a man. The trial takes place and Portia grants Shylock the pound of flesh, and counsels him to show mercy. Shylock takes out his knife to cut the flesh from the area close to Antonio’s heart and she stops him and tells him that it is against the law for anyone to shed a drop of Christian blood.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 374: Shylock pauses and she rules that for threatening the life of a Christian he will have to forfeit all his possessions and convert to Christianity.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 380: In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare is decidedly not anti-Semitic. It is just the opposite. We are definitely attracted to the Christians and we can see how horrific Shylock’s intention is but that is outweighed by the provocation he is subjected to: his social shunning, attempts to exploit him, daily insults about him and his religion, and the dramatic acts of the abduction of his daughter and the stealing of his property.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 382: Any writer who could write Shylock’s speech about being a Jew can see the anti-Semitic dialectic of his time for what it was. Shakespeare was far more in tune with the twenty-first century attitude than the sixteenth and seventeenth century view.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 384: Two young Christian layabouts encounter Shylock just after his daughter has run off with Lorenzo. He is highly distraught but they mock him. He is furious and it all comes out at last.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 390: enemies; and what’s his reason? I am a Jew. Hath
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 401: In the way Shakespeare ends the play he shows how deeply-rooted anti-Semitism was in his time. A Twenty-first century audience will feel sorry for Shylock but an Elizabethan audience would probably have cheered.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 403: All that shows how universal Shakespeare was in his perception of the world around him – how it was before his time, how it was in his time, and how it will be after his time. How will this play look in four hundred years from now? Audiences will most certainly find it relevant to their time as well.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 440: With bated breath and whisp’ring humbleness,
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 441: Say this:
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 496: Upea historiallinen draamasarja renessanssiajan Italian mahtisuvusta saa päätöksensä kolmannen kauden myötä. Teema keskiviikosta perjantaihin 22.4.2020 alkaen klo 20. Koko sarja Areenassa 24.4. alkaen.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 506: Tää sarja oli historiallisesti täysin falski. Todellisuudessa totaalisesti perseelleen meni kaikki Mediceiltä Dick Tracyn kuoltua, kuten kertoo Lauri "Stronzo" Pohjanpää nelinäytöxisessä murhenäytelmässään Savonarola, jonka premiääri oli Kansallisessa 1935. Eikä Medicin miehet olleet oikeasti niin söpöjä, eikä niillä ollut partoja.
    xxx/ellauri059.html on line 514: Tässä kohtaa oli vielä lyhyitä kritiikkejä Lauri Henrik P-pään pikkusaarnoista, jota oli pantu Savon Arolan särpimexi mukaan samaan niteeseen. Ikävä kyllä ne on kadonneet. Ne saarnat oli aivan perseestä, voi jälkeenpäin muistinvaraisesti todeta. Tiivistäen: Nimisaarnan Anna fon Tollo oli aatelinen ämmä joka oli haikaillut jonkun köyhän säveltäjän perään, vaik oli aikanaan ize preferoinut fon Tollon paxumpaa rahamassia. No size kuoli se säveltäjä, ja ämmä lupas izellensä tehdä parannuxen, eli olla vähän hövelimpi palvelusväelle ja muulle laahuxelle. Syy-yhteyttä on vaikee havaita. Siziellä oli se Olavi Mela, joka sai haimasyövän ja alkoi kantaa huolta taivastontista kuin Pauli Pylkkänen. Se koitti Kaarlo Syvännön tapaan peukalovärssyä hyvästä kirjasta, ja löytyi lohduttavasti: iskä arlmahtaa, kuha vaan Olavi uskoo melan ylösnousemuxeen. Ja narshishtirovashti, joka jätti kaikki silleen ja ruustinnankin heitteille, kun sen poika narahti varmaan huumerikoxesta ulkomailla. Se oli SYYYYLLINEN, kuin Niklas kaadettuaan spagettikattilan. Vittu varmaan oli bylsinyt poikaa pienenä. Ja ämmä jonka poika oli kuolemassa johkin tartuntatautiin, josta tuntu turvalliselta kun se kexi kaataa koko huolen yljän sylkkyyn: nyze lapsi on turvan takana, vaikka ruumiina. Ja niin edespäin.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 59: Vsesojuznyj on kirjoitettu väärin s.458. Ärsyttävää puolisivistyneisyyttä. Tässä jaxossa on typerää hauskanpitoa vähäosaisempien kustannuxella ja neuvostohistorian vääristelyä. Aitoamerikkalaista koloniaali"huumoria". Food fight tästä enää puuttuisi. Rypälemarenkitortun paiskaaminen Stalinin naamaan. Kyttyräselät, spitaaliset, hebefreenikot (Saku oli sellainen) ja kaikenlaiset rammat ovat putkahtaneet loukoistaan kazelemaan tätä hupia. Taas tätä amerikkalaista arabi"terroristi"pelkoa sekottuneena vanhempaan ryssä"kommunisti"pelkoon ja saku"nazi"pelkoon.. Vizi ne pelkää kaikkia jotka vähänkin uhkaa niiden öljyhegemoniaa keski-Aasiassa. Kaikki Nobelien näiltä kentiltä saadut öljyrahat on käytetty Nobel-palkintoihin. Donald Trump vihjaa kohta vastaanottavansa fysiikan Nobel-palkinnon.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 66: A group of philologists, united in the Society of Lovers of Russian Literature,sharply criticized the romanization. This society set up a commission that issued astatement that Latin "not only does not make it easier, but rather makes it moredifficult for foreigners to study the Russian language." Yet it was not until the late 1930s that the attempt of the romanization of the Russian alphabet was given up. There were also political reasons for the introduction of Russian as a second language. From the international perspective, the Soviet leadership was disillusioned with the course for the world communist revolution, which was now viewed as a matter of distant future. The need for a common international script on the European (Latin) base was no longer as topical as before.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 68: The events in Germany since January 30, 1933, when Nazis came to power and declared as their aim the march to the east to capture resourcesand "living space" greatly contributed to it. The USSR realized the enormous importance of the national question and recognized the great role of the country´s history and patriotism in the consolidation of the society. There was mounting criticism of romanization. It was admitted that, in some cases, there had been overreliance on the alphabetical creativity of the linguists,engaged in language construction, which manifested itself in the creation of individual alphabets for numerically very small dialects, as well as in the overly largenumber of letters for some alphabets, in frequent disregard for the practical problemsof language construction and in the exclusive use of the Latin as a possible basis forthe creation of writing for the illiterate peoples, as well as in the insufficient attentionto the use of other alphabets (Novyi alfavit (The New Alphabet), 1934).
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 82: According to a family legend, his mother, Uldan, gave birth to him near Mt. Zhambyl, close to the headwaters of the Chu River while fleeing an attack on her village. His father, Dzhabay, then named his son after the mountain.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 84: As a boy, Zhambyl learned how to play the dombura and at age 14, left his home to become an akyn. He learned the art of improvisation from the akyn Suyunbai Aronuly. Zhambyl sang exclusively in the Kazakh language.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 87: Jambyl Jabayev died on 22 June 1945, eight months before his 100th birthday. He was buried in Alma-Ata in a garden which he cultivated with his own hands.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 88: The Kazakh city of Taraz was named after Zhambyl from 1938 to 1997. Jambyl Province, in which Taraz is located, still bears his name.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 93: In a different account, according to the Kazakh journalist Erbol Kurnmanbaev, Zhambyl was an akyn of his clan, but until 1936 was relatively unknown. In that year, a young talented poet Abilda Tazhibaev "discovered" Zhambyl. He was directed to do this by the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Kazakhstan, Levon Mirzoyan, who wanted to find an akyn similar to Suleiman Stalsky, the Dagestani poet. Tazhibaev then published the poem "My Country", under Jambyl's name. It was translated into Russian by the poet Pavel Kuznetsov, published in the newspaper "Pravda" and was a success. After that, a group of his "secretaries" - the young Kazakh poets worked under Jambyl's name. In 1941-1943, they were joined by the Russian poet Mark Tarlovsky.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 111: Mulla on Borat-uikkarit joita en ole saanut käyttää kertaakaan. Ostin ne Bostonissa 2007 jonkun paikallisen Mallin uimahousuliikkestä. Kun pyysin Borat uikkareita kaupan neitoset menivät takahuoneeseen nauramaan. Amerikkalaista kälyä Jill Aldenia (juu, samoja Aldeneita jotka kirjoittivat alle izenäisyysjulistuxen ja varmaan tuli samalla laivalla briteistä kuin Pynchonit ja Breckenridget) ei Borat yhtään naurattanut, koska se teki pilkkaa amerikkalaisista arvoista. Kuten että supermarketissa on useita hyllyjä pelkkää juustoa. Is this cheese? No Pynchonit sai vaan mitä ansaizi, tehtyään magnum opuxessa pilkkaa Kazakhstanin runoilijoista ja potassiumvaroista.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 117: At the behest of the Kazakh Ministry of Information, reporter Borat Sagdiyev leaves Kazakhstan for the "US and A", the "Greatest Country in the World", to make a documentary about American society and culture. He leaves behind his wife, Oksana; his companions are his producer, Azamat Bagatov, and a pet hen.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 119: In New York City, Borat sees an episode of Baywatch on TV and immediately falls in love with Pamela Anderson's character, C. J. Parker. While interviewing and mocking a panel of feminists, he learns of the actress' name and her residence in California. Borat is then informed by telegram that Oksana has been killed by a bear. Delighted, he resolves to travel to California and make Anderson his new wife. They decide not to fly, in case "the Jews repeat their attack of 9/11". Borat takes driving lessons and buys a dilapidated ice-cream truck for the journey.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 121: During the trip, Borat acquires a Baywatch booklet and continues gathering footage for his documentary. He meets gay pride parade participants, politicians Alan Keyes and Bob Barr, and African-American youths. Borat is also interviewed on a local television station and proceeds to disrupt the weather report. Visiting a rodeo, Borat excites the crowd with jingoistic remarks, but then sings a fictional Kazakhstani national anthem to the tune of "The Star-Spangled Banner", receiving a strong negative reaction.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 127: At a hotel, Borat sees Azamat masturbating over a picture of Pamela Anderson. An angry Borat accidentally reveals his real motive for travelling to California. Azamat becomes livid at Borat's deception, and the situation escalates into a nude brawl which spills out into the hallway, a crowded elevator, and then into a packed convention ballroom.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 129: Azamat abandons Borat, taking his passport, all of their money, and their bear. Borat's truck runs out of fuel, and he begins to hitchhike to California. He is soon picked up by drunken fraternity brothers from the University of South Carolina. On learning the reason for his trip, they show him the Pam and Tommy sex tape which reveals that she is not a virgin. Despondent, Borat burns the Baywatch booklet and, by mistake, his return ticket to Kazakhstan.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 131: Borat attends a United Pentecostal camp meeting, at which Republican U.S. Representative Chip Pickering and Mississippi Supreme Court Chief Justice James W. Smith, Jr. are present. He regains his faith and forgives Azamat and Pamela. He accompanies church members on a bus to Los Angeles and disembarks to find Azamat dressed as Oliver Hardy, although Borat mistakes him for Adolf Hitler. The two reconcile and Azamat tells Borat where to find Pamela Anderson. Borat finally comes face-to-face with Anderson at a book signing at a Virgin Megastore. After showing Anderson his "traditional marriage sack", Borat pursues her throughout the store in an attempt to abduct her, until security guards intervene.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 133: Borat visits Luenell and they return to Kazakhstan together. They bring several American customs and traditions back to his village, including the apparent conversion of the people to Christianity (the Kazakh version of which includes crucifixion and torturing of Jews) and the introduction of computer-based technology, such as iPods, laptop computers and a high-definition television.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 141: (stylized as ВОЯДТ in Faux Cyrillic) is a 2020 American mockumentary comedy film directed by Jason Woliner in his feature directorial debut. The film stars Sacha Baron Cohen as the fictional Kazakhstani journalist and television personality Borat Sagdiyev, and Maria Bakalova as his daughter Tutar, who is to be offered as a bride to Vice President Mike Pence during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election. It is a sequel to 2006's Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 143: After fourteen years of forced labor in a gulag for the dishonor inflicted on his country in his previous adventure, Kazakh journalist Borat Sagdiyev is released by his country's president, Nursultan Nazarbayev, with a mission to deliver Kazakh Minister of Culture (and Kazakhstan's most famous porn actor) Johnny the Monkey to President Donald Trump in an attempt to redeem the nation. Unable to get close to Trump after defecating in the landscaping of Trump International Hotel and Tower in the previous film, Borat opts to give the monkey to Vice President Mike Pence. Before he leaves, he discovers that his arch nemesis neighbor, Nursultan Tulyakbay, has stolen his family and home, and that he has a fifteen-year-old daughter, Tutar, who lives in his barn.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 151: Shaken, Borat decides to commit suicide by going to the nearest synagogue dressed as his version of a stereotypical Jew and waiting for the next shooting, but is shocked to find Holocaust survivors there who treat him with kindness, and to his anti-Semitic delight, reassure him that the Holocaust happened. Overjoyed, Borat goes looking for Tutar, but finds the streets deserted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. He quarantines with two QAnon conspiracy theorists who offer to help him reunite with Tutar. They find Tutar online, she has become a reporter and will be covering a March for Our Rights rally in Olympia, Washington.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 155: Borat is shocked to find he will not be executed as he had instead been used as retaliation by Nazarbayev for making Kazakhstan a laughingstock. Before departing for the United States, Kazakhstan officials infected Borat with SARS-CoV-2 via an injection of "gypsy tears", making him patient zero of the COVID-19 pandemic. As he was sent around the world, he continued to spread the virus. Borat records Nazarbayev's admission and sends it to Brian, the man who sold him his phone.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 157: Borat and Tutar blackmail Nazarbayev into giving him his job back and changing Kazakhstan's misogynistic laws. Three months later, Tutar and Borat are a reporting team and Kazakhstan has a new tradition to replace the nation's antisemitic ones: the Running of the American. It features exaggerated :) caricatures of Trump supporters pretending to spread COVID-19 and killing an effigy of Anthony Fauci. The film ends with a message encouraging viewers to vote in the upcoming presidential election.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 187: "My own favourite tribute to Borges comes in Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow in which a group of Argentinian exiles, led by the adventurer Squalidozzi, and at large in Europe during World War Two, hijack a German submarine. Improbably, they are accompanied by the glamorous Graciela Imago Portales – a ‘particular friend’ of the Buenos Aires literati – to whom ‘Borges is said to have a dedicated a poem’. Two lines are cited: “El laberinto de tu incertidumbre / Me trama con la disquietante luna . . .” Of course, the quotation has puzzled scholars, as it is neatly consistent with the rhythms and motifs of Borges’ earlier work, and yet nowhere to be found in his oeuvre. It would no doubt have delighted Borges, the more so since Pynchon made it up."
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 191: Jorge Francisco Isidoro Luis Borges (Buenos Aires, 24 de agosto de 1899-Ginebra, 14 de junio de 1986) fue un escritor de cuentos, ensayos y poemas argentino, extensamente considerado una figura clave tanto para la literatura en habla hispana como para la literatura universal.​ Sus dos libros más conocidos, Ficciones y El Aleph, publicados en los años cuarenta, son recopilaciones de cuentos conectados por temas comunes, como los sueños, los laberintos, las bibliotecas, los espejos, los autores ficticios y la mitología europea, con argumentos que exploran ideas filosóficas relacionadas, por ejemplo, con la memoria, la eternidad, la posmodernidad y la metaficción.​ Las obras de Borges han contribuido ampliamente a la literatura filosófica, al género fantástico y al posestructuralismo. Según marcan numerosos críticos, el comienzo del realismo mágico en la literatura hispanoamericana del siglo XX se debe en gran parte a su obra.​
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 213: I said some of this yesterday, but it wasn’t easy: in one interview, the first question I was asked was about Borges’s sexuality. Infrequent, they said, unusual, like in his stories. The first thing that came to mind was an article on Hans Christian Andersen, published in his own centenary in 2005, which doesn’t say a word about Andersen’s oeuvre and instead is dedicated to providing a pathetic portrait of the repressed homosexual, the vindictive upstart, the complicated and ugly man, like the duckling, which was Andersen. I’m intentionally omitting who wrote it and where it can be found.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 217: Next, it occurred to me that I could answer the question about the sex life of Borges with platitudes: Borges scarcely refers to sex in his work and has scarcely any female characters, which “could be” a sign of shortcomings in his character, of machismo, asexuality, fear of women; his first marriage “could be considered” a failure and the second as a mere formality, made official shortly before his death just so he could leave his estate to Maria Kodama, his lover/scribe/assistant/caregiver; “without a doubt” the contempt he felt for psychoanalysis was because it made him feel exposed, and so on. I have read or heard all these phrases, with all their imaginable malice, often together and separately. Although they all seem terrible to me, it is now acceptable to speak ill in this way under the pretext of “demystifying” whomever the target may be. I have also noticed that much of the news about Borges in recent years has been, in one way or another, about scandals and disputes.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 219: So what did I do? I chose to remember that Borges is not a writer of the era of Facebook and autofiction; that it is not true that he hides in his texts, speaks little about himself (in fact, the opposite is true: how often in his work does his double appear, the character called Borges?); he simply does not do it the way in which we are accustomed today; that, like his friend Alfonso Reyes, Borges learned the classical notion of decorum, which is a set of rules of style when writing and also a certain principle of discretion, an obligation not to say absolutely everything that is very likely inconceivable to many people today.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 221: I also said something about Borges’s love life, which is present in several places in his work, just like his reticence, yes, to go beyond “a certain point” (in the story “The Other,” for example, various critics have found a subtle reference to a brothel and a prostitute located almost in a blank space, between two French names that are almost identical).
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 223: And then I talked a little about what interests me most about Borges: his imagination, his problematic but in the end (or in his best moments) rebellious relationship with power and violence, what he still has to say about reading, tradition, the way in which we create (or he created for us) images of the world, models, ideologies.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 229: Since another common practice today is the out-of-context quote, misinterpreted without the slightest remorse, allow me to end with one: “The world, unfortunately, is real,” Borges wrote in one of his great essays, which could be read as an acknowledgment or a surrender.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 269: Martti (Martin) Rautanen, also known as El Gaucho Martín Fierro, is a 2,316-line epic poem by the Argentine writer José Hernández. The poem was originally published in two parts, El Gaucho Martín Fierro (1872) and La Vuelta de Martín Fierro (1879). The poem supplied a historical link to the gauchos' contribution to the national development of Argentina, for the gaucho had played a major role in Argentina's independence from Spain.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 271: Like most of his compatriots, Borges was a great admirer of this work, which he often characterized as the one clearly great work in Argentine literature.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 276: Martin was not a nice guy. One of his great talents was singing at the Pulperia. At the fort, he was forced to work hard and fight against the Indians. He had a night-long payada (singing duel) with a black payador (singer), who turns out to be the younger brother of the man Fierro murdered in a duel. He deliberately provoked an affair of honor by insulting a black woman in a bar. In the knife duel that ensued, he killer her male companion. He escaped justice with a police sergeant and went native.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 278: In Thomas Pynchon's novel Gravity's Rainbow, a group of Argentine anarchists led by Francisco Squalidozzi collaborate with a German filmmaker, Gerhardt von Göll, to create a film version of Martín Fierro.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 332: Being abused in such a way caused women at nunneries to be burned if they were found pregnant. It became generally accepted that incubi and succubi were the same demon, able to switch between male and female forms. A succubus would be able to sleep with a man and collect his sperm, and then transform into an incubus and use that seed on women. Some sources indicate that it may be identified by its unnaturally large or cold penis.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 364: Von 1922 bis 1924 arbeitete Wilhelm als wissenschaftlicher Berater in der deutschen Gesandtschaft in Peking, daneben lehrte er an der Peking-Universität. Hier übersetzte er auch das I Ging (Buch der Wandlungen) ins Deutsche. (Tätähän laulukirjaa mäkin on suomentanut jossain kohtaa pikku Kunin avustuxella, eikö vaan? Kun on kyllä nätimpi kuin Wilhelmin ope.) In die Kommentierung flossen Zitate sowohl aus der Bibel als auch von Goethe, aber auch Gedankengut westlicher Philosophen und protestantischer, parsischer und alt-griechischer Theologie ein. Wilhelm zeigte damit viele Parallelen zu chinesischer Weisheit auf. Joopa joo, tää on Sachsan Pertti Nieminen.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 400: “Everyone once, once only. Just once and no more. And we also once. Never again. But this having been once, although only once, to have been of the earth, seems irrevocable.”
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 419: Korpraalin führeröimässä Valtiossa (huom. kapitaali, tyypillistä Nipistyspäätä) 1, paikka pitää tehdä viattomuudelle (ällösana), ja sen monille käytöille 2. Virallisen version viattomuudesta tekemisessä, lapsuuden kulttuuri on osoittautunut arvottomaxi 3 . Valtaistuinpelit, homokaskut, lukuohjeet historiasta, kaikki uskontekovempeleet voidaan sovittaa ja jopa istuttaa fysikaaliseen paikkaan, kuten esim. 12 skidiä. 5. Vuosien yli siitä oli tullut lasten lomakohde, melkeinpä kylpylä. Jos olit aikaihminen, et päässyt kaupungin rajojen sisälle ilman lapsi-ilolintua. Siellä oli lapsimajuri 6, lapsivaltuusto kahdeltatoista. Lapset poimivat papruja, banaainkuoria ja pulloja jotka jätit kadulle, lapset antoivat sinulle opaskierroxia Eläinpuiston läpi 7, Nibelungien läjä, 8, varoittivat sinut hiljaisuuteen Bismarkin kohouman vaikuttavan uudelleenpystytyxen aikana, kevään päiväntasauxena sakujen tappiovuonna 1871, prinssille ja keisarilliselle kumittajalle 9,… lapsipoliisi soimasi sinua jos jäit kiinni yxin, ilman lapsi-ilolintua. Kuka tahansa kantoi kaupungin todellista liiketoimintaa—se ei olisi voinut olla lapsia—ne oli piilotettu hyvin. 10
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 433: And are gone to praise God and his Priest and King, Ja on menneet kehumaan Jumalaa (hk) ja sen Pappia ja Kunkkua (ditto),
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 442: 4 "Valtaistuinpelit, homokaskut, lukuohjeet historiasta, kaikki uskontekovempeleet voidaan sovittaa ja jopa istuttaa fysikaaliseen paikkaan" — fysikaaliseen paikkaan kuten Munamyrkytyxen Sademirri. No, okei. Minä tarkoitan, me saamme tiivisteen tässä Nipistäjän oikeudenkäynnistä, hänen yhdisteestään, hänen sieppaa-kassista lauluista ja jekuista ja herjoista ja läpistä ja kaskusta ja ymmistä.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 448: “12 skidiä” – nimi kuzuu Jaakon 12 poikaa (ja Dinah-tyttären joka on kolmastoista eikä kuulu viralliseen 12). Tämä hahmo on ize-tietoisesti toistettu Grimmin sadussa "12 veljestä”, jossa pojat kuolevat jos niiden äiti synnyttää tyttären. (Ei hätää, Jaakopin pojilla oli eri äitejä, ne oli vaan velipuolia. Ja Dinahista ne teki selvän ihan ize, kun sen kundikaveri ei kelvannut koukkunokille.)
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 523: Nipistimen mukaan Amerikan Horst Wessel Lied oli This is the Army Mister Jones. Se menee näin:
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 530: The sergeant looked them over and this is what he said. Kessu tunnusteli niitä sieltä täältä ja sössötti:
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 531: This is the army, Mister Jones Tämä on US Army, Mister Jones
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 535: This is the army, Mister Green Tää on US Army, herra Vihreä
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 541: This is the army, Mister Brown Tää on US Army, herra Ruskea
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 543: She had you worried but this is war Sait olla huolissaan, muttei enää tarvize
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 551: Irving Berlin (born Israel Beilin; Yiddish: ישראל ביילין‎; May 11, 1888[3] – September 22, 1989) was an American composer and lyricist, widely considered one of the greatest songwriters in American history. His music forms a great part of the Great American Songbook. Born in Imperial Russia, Berlin arrived in the United States at the age of five.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 553: He wrote hundreds of songs, many becoming major hits, which made him famous before he turned thirty. During his 60-year career he wrote an estimated 1,500 songs, including the scores for 20 original Broadway shows and 15 original Hollywood films, with his songs nominated eight times for Academy Awards. Many songs became popular themes and anthems, including "Alexander's Ragtime Band", "Easter Parade", "Puttin' on the Ritz", "Cheek to Cheek", "White Christmas", "Happy Holiday", "Anything You Can Do (I Can Do Better)", and "There's No Business Like Show Business". His Broadway musical and 1943 film This is the Army, with Ronald Reagan, had Kate Smith singing Berlin's "God Bless America" which was first performed in 1938.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 557: Berlin died in 1989 at the age of 101. Composer Douglas Moore sets Berlin apart from all other contemporary songwriters, and includes him instead with Stephen Foster, Walt Whitman, and Carl Sandburg, as a "great American minstrel"—someone who has "caught and immortalized in his songs what we say, what we think about, and what we believe." Composer George Gershwin called him "the greatest songwriter that has ever lived" and composer Jerome Kern concluded that "Irving Berlin has no place in American music—he is American music."
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 559: President George H. W. Bush said Berlin was "a legendary man whose words and music will help define the history of our nation." Just minutes before the President's statement was released, he joined a crowd of thousands to sing Berlin's "God Bless America" at a luncheon in Boston. Former President Ronald Reagan, who costarred in Berlin's 1943 musical This Is the Army, said, "Nancy and I are deeply saddened by the death of a wonderfully talented man whose musical genius delighted and stirred millions and will live on forever."
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 561: No Ronaldilla oli kyllä oma lehmä ojassa, This is the Armyn entisenä tähtenä. Iisakki kynäili myös God Bless American, joka on jenkkilän Deutschland Deutschland über alles. Ja siltä on myös toi Easter Parade, sekä White Christmas. There is no business like show business! Irving Berlin Inc.
    xxx/ellauri068.html on line 565: Isaiah Berlin was often described, especially in his old age, by means of superlatives: the world's greatest talker, the century's most inspired reader, one of the finest minds of our time. Sir Isaiah radiated well-being.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 47: Tiina oli vuosikaudet vanhempien luottovanki. Nyt on nähty Mikkoa useasti kulkemassa apinalinnan kylkeä puhumassa izexeen. Tukka sekaisin kuin petolinnun perse, etukenossa muovikassi kädessä syrjäytyneen näköisenä. Ei sentään terveysside päässä. Mikko käy lauantaisin lounaalla Tiinan luona syömässä äidin tekemiä herkkuja ja pelaamassa sanapelejä. Tuli mieleen että näinköhän se historia toistaa itseään. Isien ja äitien pahat teot ja niin edespäin. Tän jos julkaisen niin en ole enää edes pen päl.


    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 79: Schestows Gedanken bilden auf den ersten Blick alles andere als eine Philosophie: Sie bilden keine systematische Einheit, kein kohärentes System von Aussagen, keine theoretische Erklärung philosophischer Probleme. Ein Großteil von Schestows Werk ist fragmentarisch, sowohl in Bezug auf die Form (er benutzte oft Aphorismen) als auch in Bezug auf Stil und Inhalt. Schestow scheint sich selbst häufig zu widersprechen, das Paradoxe sogar zu suchen.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 118: He went on to study law and mathematics at the Moscow State University but after a clash with the Inspector of Students he was told to return to Kiev, where he completed his studies. Taas yxi ukrainalainen jutkuketku, pahan kerran vastarannan kiiski, kuten anglosaxit sanovat:
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 120: Lev Isaakovich Shestov (Russian: Лев Исаа́кович Шесто́в; 31 January [O.S. 13 February] 1866 – 19 November 1938), born Yehuda Leib Shvartsman (Russian: Иегуда Лейб Шварцман), was a Russian existentialist and religious philosopher. He is best known for his critiques of both philosophic rationalism and positivism. His work advocated a movement beyond reason and metaphysics, arguing that these are incapable of conclusively establishing truth about ultimate problems, including the nature of God or existence. Contemporary scholars have associated his work with the label "anti-philosophy.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 122: Today, Shestov is little known in the English-speaking world. This is partly because his works have not been readily available. Partly the specific themes he discusses are unfashionable and "foreign". A sombre and yet ecstatic atmosphere permeates his writings. And his quasi-nihilistic position and religious outlook are an unsettling and incongruous combination, at first sight.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 124: He did however influence writers such as Albert Camus (who wrote about him in Le Mythe de Sisyphe, The Myth of Sisyphus), Benjamin Fondane (his 'pupil'), the poet Paul Celan, and notably Emil Cioran, who wrote some favorable shit about Shestov.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 151: He developed his thinking in a second book on Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Frederich Nietzsche, which increased Shestov's reputation as an original and incisive thinker. In All Things Are Possible (published in 1905) Shestov adopted the aphoristic style of Friedrich Nietzsche to investigate the difference between Russian and European Literature. Although on the surface it is an exploration of numerous intellectual topics, at its base it is a sardonic work of Existentialist philosophy which both criticizes and satirizes our fundamental attitudes towards life situations. D.H. Lawrence, who wrote the Foreword to S.S. Koteliansky's literary translation of the work, summarized Shestov's philosophy with the words: " 'Everything is possible' - this is his really central cry. It is not nihilism. It is only a shaking free of the human psyche from old bonds. The positive central idea is that the human psyche, or soul, really believes in itself, and in nothing else". Shestov deals with key issues such as religion, rationalism, and science in this highly approachable work, topics he would also examine in later writings such as In Job's Balances. Shestov's own key quote from this work is probably the following: "...we need to think that only one assertion has or can have any objective reality: that nothing on earth is impossible. Every time someone wants to force us to admit that there are other, more limited and limiting truths, we must resist with every means we can lay hands on".
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 153: Shestov's works were not met with approval even by some of his closest Russian friends. Many saw in Shestov's work a renunciation of reason and metaphysics, and even an espousal of nihilism. Nevertheless, he would find admirers in such writers as D. H. Lawrence and his friend Georges Bataille.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 155: Shestov's dislike of the Soviet regime led him to undertake a long journey out of Russia, and he eventually ended up in France. (LOL se lähti livohkaan bolshevikkeja, niinkuin monet muutkin ökyporvarit.) The author was a popular figure in France, where his originality was quickly recognized. That this Russian was newly appreciated is attested by his having been asked to contribute to a prestigious French philosophy journal.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 157: In the interwar years, Shestov continued to develop into a thinker of great prominence. During this time he had become totally immersed in the study of such "great theologians" as Blaise Pascal and Plotinus, whilst at the same time lecturing at the Sorbonne in 1925. In 1926 he was introduced to Edmund Husserl, with whom he maintained a cordial relationship despite radical differences in their philosophical outlook. In 1929, during a return to Freiburg he met with Nazi Heidegger, and was urged to study Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 159: The discovery of Kierkegaard prompted Shestov to realise that his philosophy shared great similarities, such as his rejection of idealism, and his belief that man can gain ultimate knowledge through ungrounded subjective thought rather than objective reason and verifiability. However, Shestov maintained that Kierkegaard did not pursue this line of thought far enough, and continued where he thought the Dane left off.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 163: The results of this tendency are seen in his work Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy: Vox Clamantis in Deserto, published in 1936, a fundamental work of Christian existentialism.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 168: Despite his weakening condition Shestov continued to write at a quick pace, and finally completed his magnum opus, Athens and Jerusalem. This work examines the dichotomy between freedom and reason, and argues that reason be rejected in the discipline of philosophy. Furthermore, it adumbrates the means by which the scientific method has made philosophy and science irreconcilable, since science concerns itself with empirical observation, whereas (so Shestov argues) philosophy must be concerned with freedom, God and immortality, issues that cannot be solved by science.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 170: Ettei vaan tullut hutiloitua loppukiireissä. Vanhaa tuttua totuuden kaksoisstandardia, alternatiivia totuutta, hämärämiesten viimeisiä hämähäkinseittejä. Näitä kaxineuvoisia oli aikanaan tosi paljon, esim se Maeterlinck, ja se Monodin häiskä, Bergson mitälie nyt olikaan. Käytetään kallon vasenta loobia arkena ja oikeata pyhänä. Mihinkähän kuolettavaan tautiin Sestofilt lopulta sairastui kesämökillä, varmaan kuppa. Sestofiltin versio Faithista on aika lailla Wallun huumehörhöilyn kuulosta.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 172: Furthermore, although a Jewish philosopher, Shestov saw in the resurrection of Christ this victory over necessity. He described the incarnation and resurrection of Jesus as a transfiguring spectacle by which it is demonstrated that the purpose of life is not "mystical" surrender to the "absolute", but ascetical struggle:
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 178: Likewise, the final words of his last and greatest work, Athens and Jerusalem, are: "Philosophy is not Besinnen [thinking over] but struggle. And this struggle has no end and will have no end. The kingdom of G-d, as it is written, is attained through violence." (cf Matthew 11:12)
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 182: Today, Shestov is little known in the English-speaking world. This is partly because his works have not been available in English. Partly the specific themes he discusses are unfashionable and "foreign". A sombre and yet ecstatic atmosphere permeates his writings. And his quasi-nihilistic position and religious outlook are an unsettling and incongruous combination, at first sight.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 186: He did however influence writers such as Albert Camus (who wrote about him in Le Mythe de Sisyphe), Benjamin Fondane (his 'pupil'), the poet Paul Celan, and notably Emil Cioran, who writes about Shestov:
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 194: More recently, alongside Dostoyevsky's philosophy, many have found solace in Shestov's battle against the rational self-consistent and self-evident; for example Bernard Martin of Case Western Reserve University, who translated his works now found online [external link below]; and the scholar Liza Knapp, who wrote The Annihilation of Inertia: Dostoevsky and Metaphysics. This book was an evaluation of Dostoyevsky's struggle against the self-evident "wall", and refers to Shestov on several occasions.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 205: Leo Strauss (/straʊs/;[30] German: [ˈleːo ˈʃtʁaʊs];[31][32] September 20, 1899 – October 18, 1973) was a German-American political philosopher and classicist who specialized in classical political philosophy. Born in Germany to Jewish parents, Strauss later emigrated from Germany to the United States. He spent much of his career as a professor of political science at the University of Chicago, where he taught several generations of students and published fifteen books.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 207: Trained in the neo-Kantian tradition with Ernst Cassirer and immersed in the work of the phenomenologists Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, Strauss established his fame with path-breaking books on Spinoza and Hobbes, then with articles on Maimonides and Farabi. In the late 1930s his research focused on the rediscovery of esoteric writing, thereby a new illumination of Plato and Aristotle, retracing their interpretation through medieval Islamic and Jewish philosophy, and encouraging the application of those ideas to contemporary political theory.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 211: He attended courses at the Universities of Freiburg and Marburg, including some taught by Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger. Strauss joined a Jewish fraternity and worked for the German Zionist movement, which introduced him to various German Jewish intellectuals, such as Norbert Elias, Leo Löwenthal, Hannah Arendt and Walter Benjamin. Walter Benjamin was and remained an admirer of Strauss and his work throughout his mournful life.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 215: Klein was born in Libava, Russian Empire. He studied at Berlin and Marburg, where he received his Ph.D. in 1922. A student of Nicolai Hartmann, Martin Heidegger, and Edmund Husserl, he later taught at St. John's College in Annapolis, Maryland from 1937 until his death. He served as dean from 1949 to 1958.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 219: Kuinka ollakaan, Lefa kehui Jaschan kirjan Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra ihan kuplixi. The central thesis of his work Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra is that the modern concept of mathematics is based on the symbolic interpretation of the Greek concept of number (arithmos). Mulla on se kirja, ostin MIT:n kirja-alesta. Tossa se on hyllyssä. Se on pehmeekantinen. Mä oon lukenutkin sen, muistaaxeni se vaikutti tylsältä.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 229: taidehistorioitsija ja tietokirjailija. Kirjojen lisäksi Kortelainen on
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 230: kirjoittanut esseitä ja artikkeleita taidehistoriallisiin julkaisuihin, kirjoihin
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 305: Klages was a central figure of characterological psychology and the Lebensphilosophie school of thought. Prominent elements of his philosophy include: the opposition between life-affirming Seele and life-denying Geist; reality as the on-going creation and interpretation of sensory images, rather than feelings; a biocentric ethics in response to modern ecological issues and militarism; an affirmation of eroticism in critique of both Christian patriarchy and the notion of the "sexual"; a theory of psychology focused on expression, including handwriting analysis; and a science of character aimed at reconciling the human ego to the divide it effectuates between living beings.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 307: Central to Klages' thought is a linguistic opposition to logocentrism, a term introduced by Klages to diagnose a fixation on language or words to the detriment of the things to which they refer. (Put that in your pipe and smoke, Benjamin!) His formulation of this concept came to be of significant importance to semiotic studies of Western science and philosophy, namely within Derridean deconstruction. Klages is similarly seen as a buggybear to critical theory, deep ecology, and existential phenomenology. Historically little of his odious literary output has been available in English, being too thick and long-winded to translate.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 309: Unlike his Seelenbrüder Stefan George and Alfred Schwuler, he was not gay, but rather serious. When Klages moved into a new Schwabing flat in 1895, he entered into an intense sexual relationship with his landlady's daughter, with the mother's approval; the daughter, whom Klages called 'Putti', was eleven years younger than him, and their relationship continued for almost two decades though remained only sexual in nature. Klages, like Friedrich Nietzsche, was critical of Christianity as well as what they both saw as its roots in Judaism. His attacks on judaism were veiled criticism of christianity, rather like Seija's attacks on the rest of the Carlson family.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 312: wrote: I have never endorsed the claim that the Nazi big-wigs belonged to a superior race. However, I must also add that I have consistently refused to accept the claim of another such race as the chosen people. The arrogance is identical in both cases, but with this important distinction: after waging war against the dumber half of mankind for more than three thousand years, Judaism has finally achieved total victory over all nations of the earth. Not surprisingly, an American Jew found this accusation odious. What with even the Philistine diaper heads still putting up a fight.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 330: Walter Bendix Schönflies Benjamin (/ˈbɛnjəmɪn/; German: [ˈvaltɐ ˈbɛnjamiːn];[5] 15 July 1892 – 26 September 1940) was a German Jewish philosopher, cultural critic and essayist. An electric tinker, combining elements of German idealism, Romanticism, Western Marxism, and Jewish mysticism, Benjamin made enduring and influential contributions to aesthetic theory, literary criticism, and historical materialism. He was associated with the Frankfurt School, and also maintained formative friendships with thinkers such as playwright Bertolt Brecht and Kabbalah scholar Gershom Shulem. He was also related to German political theorist and philosopher Hannah Arendt through her first marriage to Benjamin's cousin, Günther Anders.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 332: Among Benjamin's best known works are the essays "The Task of the Translator" (1923), "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" (1935), and "Theses on the Philosophy of History" (1940). His major work as a literary critic included essays on Baudelaire, Goethe, Kafka, Kraus, Leskov, Proust, Walser, and translation theory. He also made major translations into German of the Tableaux Parisiens section of Baudelaire's Les Fleurs du mal and parts of Proust's À la recherche du temps perdu. In 1940, at the age of 48, Benjamin committed suicide at Portbou on the French–Spanish border while attempting to escape from the invading Wehrmacht. Though popular acclaim eluded him during his life, the decades following his death won his work posthumous renown.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 334: Benjamin’s academic career did not lead to the expected result of a professorial position: he completed his doctoral dissertation in 1919 (published the following year as The Concept of Criticism in German Romanticism) and worked on his post-doctoral dissertation, or Habilitation, on the German Baroque mourning play, which he completed in 1925, eventually withdrawing it from the University of Frankfurt after an extremely negative reception.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 338: Benjamin theorizing modernity by bringing together, among other things, Marxist dialectics, Surrealism, snippets of theology, Baudelaire’s poetry (and, most importantly, his theories of the flâneur), Kafka’s novels, the image of Proust, a Klee painting called the Angelus Novus, book-collecting, translation, storytelling, photography and film.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 347: This history of the nineteenth-century Paris arcades, creatively triggered by Louis Aragon’s (1897–1982) Le Paysan de Paris or Paris Peasant (1926), collects thousands of quotations strategically arranged with snippets of critical commentary in chapters or bundles called ‘convolutes’.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 349: Tälläsiä konvoluutteja (asiakirjakoteloita) mäkin tässä pukerran. Benjaminin jouzenlaulu ‘Historian käsitteestä’ moittii valistusta ja kapitalistista käsitystä historiasta edistyxenä. Melankolisesti se analisoi 20. vuosisataa, sotkee teologista ja messianistista soopaa marxistisen materialismin teleologisoivaan soppaan. Benjaminin mielestä heikompien lyttäys ei ole mikään emergency, se on normitoimintaa. Kleen Angelus Novus (Benjaminin omistama maalaus) oli siitä kiva. No se onkin aika lailla Waltun näkönen.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 377: In January 1968, during Lyndon B. Johnson's administration, Kitt encountered a substantial professional setback after she made anti-war statements during a White House luncheon. Kitt was asked by First Lady Lady Bird Johnson about the Vietnam War. She replied: "You send the best of this country off to be shot and maimed. No wonder the kids rebel and take pot." During a question and answer session, Kitt stated: The children of America are not rebelling for no reason. They are not hippies for no reason at all. We don't have what we have on Sunset Blvd. for no reason. They are rebelling against something. There are so many things burning the people of this country, particularly mothers. They feel they are going to raise sons – and I know what it's like, and you have children of your own, Mrs. Johnson – we raise children and send them to war.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 379: Her remarks caused Mrs. Johnson to burst into tears. It is widely believed that Kitt's career in the United States was ended following her comments about the Vietnam War, after which she was branded "a sadistic nymphomaniac" by the CIA. A defamatory CIA dossier about Kitt was discovered by Seymour Hersh in 1975. Hersh published an article about the dossier in The New York Times.[20] The dossier contained comments about Kitt's sex life and family history, along with negative opinions of her that were held by former colleagues. Kitt's response to the dossier was to say "I don't understand what this is about. I think it's disgusting."[20] Following the incident, Kitt devoted her energies to performances in Europe and Asia.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 383: Kitt died of colon cancer on Christmas Day 2008, three weeks short of her 82nd birthday at her home in Weston, Connecticut. Her daughter, Kitt McDonald, described her last days with her mother: I was with her when she died. She left this world literally screaming at the top of her lungs. She was also a guest star in "Once Upon a Time in Springfield" of The Simpsons, where she was depicted as one of Krusty's past marriages.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 411:
    It seems the clerk just woke up, his eyes are languid.

    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 460: His third novel, American Psycho (1991), was his most successful; upon its release, the literary establishment widely condemned it as overly violent and misogynistic.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 462: When asked in an interview in 2002 whether he was gay, Ellis explained that he did not identify as gay or straight but was comfortable being thought of as homosexual, bisexual or heterosexual and enjoyed playing with his persona, identifying variously as gay, straight and bisexual to different people over the years. In a 1999 interview, Ellis suggested that his reluctance to definitively label his sexuality was for "artistic reasons", "if people knew that I was straight, they'd read [my books] in a different way. If they knew I was gay, 'Psycho' would be read as a different book." In an interview with Robert F. Coleman, Ellis said he had an "indeterminate sexuality", that "any other interviewer out there will get a different answer and it just depends on the mood I am in".
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 473: In 1988, Wallace criticized Ellis’s first published essay, calling Ellis and his category of novelists “Catatonics” for their naïve pretension.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 515: Henry later called Balzac his "greatest master," and said that he had learned more about the craft of fiction from him than from anyone else. Vanha kunnon Ball-sack.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 517: His numerous letters to the many young homosexual men among his close male friends are more forthcoming. To his homosexual friend, Howard Sturgis, James could write: "I repeat, almost to indiscretion, that I could live with you. Meanwhile I can only try to live without you." In another letter to Howard Sturgis, following a long visit, James refers jocularly to their "happy little congress of two". In letters to Hugh Walpole he pursues convoluted jokes and puns about their relationship, referring to himself as an elephant who "paws you oh so benevolently" and winds about Walpole his "well meaning old trunk".
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 519: Hugh Walpole had notable authors in his family tree: on his father's side, the novelist and letter writer Horace Walpole. According to Somerset Maugham, Walpole made a sexual proposition to James, who was too inhibited to respond with his well-meaning old trunk.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 520: As a gay man at a time when homosexual practices were illegal for men in Britain, Walpole conducted a succession of intense but discreet relationships with other men, and was for much of his life in search of what he saw as "the perfect friend". He eventually found one, a married policeman, with whom he settled in the English Lake District. All is well that ends well.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 546: Mikä näissä kirjoissa oli ahistavaa? Arvatenkin sekakäyttäjät, izemurhaajat ja psykopaatit. Entä homot? Eikai Wallu koita kertoa lukijalle tässä jotakin? Siitäkin nettipalstoilla on kiistelty, että oliko Wallu ehkä kuitenkin 2-neuvonen. Mutiainen se ei kaikitenkaan ollut, tiettävästi. Eikä juutalainen.
    xxx/ellauri075.html on line 565: Hoblan oikeistokommentaattori Juri Bonsdorff näyttää erehdyttävästi kauluspaidasta ja kavaijista nousevalta huolestuneelta kyrvänpäältä. Nyze vekuttaa ryppyozaisesti siitä että Biden on lähtenyt vasemmiston tielle: se on lopettanut muurin rakentamisen, se on kieltänyt kaupalliset yxityisvankilat, se on liittänyt Amerikan takaisin WHO:hon ja Pariisin ilmastosopimuxeen. Se antaa rahaa Aahrikkaan neekerisiköiden lähdettämiseen ja päästää transut takas urheiden poikiemme joukkoon. Yrittääkö se tässä hamuilla ehkä tukea Antifasta niinkuin Trump Proud Boyseista, aprikoi Juripoika. Näitä ja muita Bidenin vasemmiston lastentauteja tukee iso enemmistö USAn äänestäjistä, siis rebublikaaneja on mukana. Mutta eihän sitten tule mitään Bidenin tärkeimmästä lupauxesta, että USAn 2 kokoomuspuoluetta vetäis yhtä köyttä pääasiasta, eli talousliberalistisen kapitalismin pyhistä arvoista? Palauttas Ameerikan unelman takaisin kunniaan? Make America truly great again? Voi helvetti, vedä kuule Juri se terska takaisin sinne bleiserin esinahkan sisään.
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 118: Hey! [whistles] Hei! [vislaa]
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 119: Hey baby, don't you wanna go somewhere? [wolf whistles] Hei beibi, ezä haluis lähtee jonnee? [susivislauxia]
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 131: Kajanus moved with his mother and sister to Paris at the age of twelve where he studied music and classical guitar, as well as attending the Cité Universitaire’s flying school. The family then relocated to Montreal, Quebec, Canada, where Kajanus worked as a stained-glass window designer.
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 133: Kajanus had developed a musical theater concept, Red Light Review, based on his memories of being a young man in places like Pigalle in Paris's red-light district. Encouraged by Grant Serpell to rework this material as pop songs, Kajanus devised the concept for Sailor.
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 145: For this intercontinental romance Tänne mannertenväliseen romanssiin
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 203: Girls! Girls! Girls! is a 1962 Golden Globe-nominated American musical comedy film starring Elvis Presley as a penniless Hawaiian fisherman who loves his life on the sea and dreams of owning his own boat. "Return to Sender", which reached No. 2 on the Billboard pop singles chart, is featured in the film. The film opened at #1 on the Variety box office chart and finished the year at #19 on the year-end list of the top-grossing films of 1962. The film earned $2.6 million at the box office.
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 467: Olavi oli tottunut jakamaan lauman vuohiin ja lampaisiin. Se oli sen duunia. Lampaiden puolella oli sihiseviä lakuhattuja. Pahisten puolella oli pastori Schmidt ja baptistit. Paavin palvojista puhumattakaan. Tai ryssänuskoisista. Kuvainpalvojia. No kyllä Olavikin näytti rainoja. Ja otti ääninauhalle syysjuhlia. Meillä on ne vielä Rauhixen vintillä. Jonain päivänä me vielä kazotaan ja kuunnellaan ne kaikki.
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 525: Nebraska-niminen leffa hölmöstä vanhuxesta, joka ei ollut oppinut mitään koko elämänsä aikana, vaan meni lehtitilauskusetuxen halpaan koko rahan edestä, oli hyvä sixi että a) siinä oli vain tavallisia ihmisiä b) siinä ei tapahtunut mitään tavallisuudesta poikkeavaa ja c) siinä kaikesta tylystä persuilusta huolimatta oli jotain epämakeaa välittämisen tuntua perheen kesken ainakin. Muut sukulaiset oli kyllä kusipäitä. Mukana sopassa myös d) perijenkkiläistä American dreamia keskellä epätoivoisen köyhää elotonta preeriaa. Tyhmä äijä oli sikäli tyhmä että se uskoi kaiken mitä sille sanottiin. Sepä vahinko sanoi huijarilehden konttorimuija osaaottavasti. Istuinpehmuste vai lippis? Lippis, valizi vanhus irtohampaat sihisten. Prize Moron luki lakissa. Näyttelijä esitti erittäin osuvasti ikävää narsistista dementtiä, muttei juuri osoittanut mitä hyvää siinä ehkä oli, paizi viimeistä silmäystä ylikilttiin poikaan avolavan ratissa. No kuten Seija huomautti, Alzheimer voi muuttaa luonnetta loppupeleissä. Mustakin voi tulla vaikka kiltti.
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 606: Kari "Kape" Aihisella on paljon mietittävää. Hän selittää ja pölöttää. Hän on 1 Suomen tunnetuimmista keittiömestareista. Hän on lukuisista reality-sarjoista tuttu tv-kokki, ruokakirjailija ja Helsingissä ja Turussa sijaizevia huippuravintoloita luozaava monialayrittäjä. Hän on menestynyt valtavan hyvin valizemallaan alalla. Hän ei silti koe izeään julkkixexi. Hän voi perseillä Ruisrockissa ihan samalla lailla kuin ennenkin. Hän on edelleen Kape Aihinen, pölöpää Turuusta. Jos ei kelpaa, niin hän voi lähtee menee.
    xxx/ellauri076.html on line 608: Vuosituhannen vaihteesta nuorista pojista alkoi tulla juhlittuja ruutukokkeja. Sitä ennen se oli naisten keittokirjan nimi. TV muutti heidän elämänsä. Niin se teki myös Kape Aihiselle. Hän ei kuitenkaan ole mielestään missään erityisen taitava. Se ei välttämättä näy teeveessä. Julia Child pudotti ruuan lattialle ottaessaan sitä uunista teeveen kokkiohjelmassa. Ei sitä kukaan huomannut.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 57: Wallu sai erektioita ruumiikkaasta Raquel Welchistä. Linda Lohania se tuskin ehti nähdä ilman vaatteita. Sosiaalityön maisteri Sally Jessy Raphael on varmasti Sally Jean Foster, Wallun äiskä. Eikai tää Wallun insestikuvaus sentään ole izekoettua? Vajakkia sukulaista bylsitään puolixi sen luvalla. Jotmuilee niin mukavasti. Mikä pyhimys se oli jota enkeli ampui nuolilla ja jota Wallun äiti käskee palvoa? Olixe äiti Teresa? Joo just se se oli.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 86: Lohan's early work won her childhood stardom, while the sleeper hit Mean Girls (2004) affirmed her status as a teen idol. After starring in Herbie: Fully Loaded (2005), Lohan quickly became the subject of intense media coverage due to a series of personal struggles and legal troubles, as well as a number of stints in rehabilitation facilities due to substance abuse. This period saw her lose several roles and had significantly impacted her career and public image negatively.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 143: Did he smile his work to see? Nauroiko se töilleen hää
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 173: Tuli vaan sitä lukiessa mieleen että aika vähissä on ton homman variaatio. Ja size on ohi aika pian kun pussit on tyhjiin imetty. Aika tärkeä piirre hommassa oli että Mikalla oli koko ajan naistensatulassa ohjat kädessä. Kontrolli ja vallantunne lisää hyvää oloa. Toinen kiintoisa piirre oli että runkun pysyminen sisällä oli Mikasta tärkeää. Darwinilla on sittenkin sormensa pelissä. Jostain syystä mun näkömielikuva Mikasta oli Volvon omaishoitaja Kari Matihaldi. Kari Matihaldi on oikeasti ihan kiltti. Veikkaisin viisikymppinen.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 207: Silti on syytä laajentaa aihepiiriä. Kadehdin Suvi Aholan kokemusta siitä, kuinka täysin hän sukelsi menneeseen vuosisataan Hilary Mantelin historiallista romaania lukiessaan. Meillä kaikilla on mahdollisuus kaikota kauas ajankohtaisista ilmiöistä kirjojen upottavassa meressä. Ilmainen vihje: kokeilkaa vaikka Runebergin runoja. Kolerasta hänkin perheineen selvisi Helsingissä 1840-luvun taitteessa, ja silloin vasta säkeitä syntyikin. Ja ostakaa mun ruuneperintorttuja! Ne on nyt Wreden kostuttamia.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 269: Robert F./Bob Death asks Gately if by any chance he’s heard the one about the fish. Glenn K. in his fucking robe overhears, and of course he’s got to put his own oar in, and breaks in and asks them all if they’ve heard the one What did the blind man say as he passed by the Quincy Market fish-stall, and without waiting says He goes “Evening, Ladies.” A couple male White Flaggers fall about, and Tamara N. slaps at the back of Glenn K.’s head’s pointy hood, but without real heat, as in like what are you going to do with this sick fuck?
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 273: Bob Death smiles coolly (South Shore bikers are required to be extremely cool in everything they do) and manipulates a wooden match with his lip and says No, not that fish-one. He has to assume a kind of bar-shout to clear the noise of his idling hawg. He leans in more toward Gately and shouts that the one he was talking about was: This wise old whiskery fish swims up to three young fish and goes, “Morning, boys, how’s the water?” and swims away; and the three young fish watch him swim away and look at each other and go, “What the fuck is water?” and swim away. The young biker leans back and smiles at Gately and gives an affable shruge and blatts away, a halter top’s tits mashed against his back.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 284: Sitäpaizi ize asiassa jengi tahtoo olla yhtä aikaa reaaliaikaisesti hurraamassa tungoxeen asti täysillä penkeillä tekemässä aaltoja. Niin pitkälle on termiittiapina jo edennyt tässä yhteispörräyxessä. Eikä mainoxista päästä koskaan mihinkään, siinä Wallu arvaa aivan pusikkoon. Jengi tykkää mainoxista, ne haluu tietää mikä kulloinkin on suosittua, mitä ostetaan, jotta ne voi sitten mennä kalaparven mukana kuin jotkin vitun silakat. Tätä on nyt mennyt paljon, sanoo myyjäkin, tietäen (tai luullen, mun kohdalla), eze on hyvä myyntipuhe monille. Niin se onkin: pikkulinnutkin lähtee miehissä syömäpaikalta kun yxi lehahtaa lentoon äkkiä. Se on turvallisempaa, se on voinut nähdä jotakin.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 311: His era was later labeled as La Grande Noirceur ("The Great Darkness") by its critics, due to his support of strong Catholic traditions, his support of private property rights vis-a-vis growing labour rights movements, and his strong opposition not only to Communism, but also to secularism, feminism, environmentalism, leftist separatism and other non-conservative and progressive political trends and movements that would influence Quebec politics and society over the following 60 years, starting with the Quiet Revolution of the 1960s under his Liberal successor Jean Lesage.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 315: A portent of his later cunning came in the 1920 championships when Vernon (“Swede”) Johnson hit a home run with the bases full to win the title for Grand’Mère. Defeated on the playing field, Duplessis did not quit. Screaming that the Grand’Mère team was loaded with “ ringers ” (although at least two of his own players were reported to be enjoying a brief vacation from the Boston Braves), Duplessis carried the protest to committee rooms. The league president, a sympathetic priest, awarded Duplessis the cup. Stop the Steal! Another Trump. Another ugly face as well.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 323: The latest data calculated by OpenSecrets.org reports on disclosed information from 2012. The latest batch of numbers shows that the 113th Congress had a median net worth of $1,008,767. This is the first time in history that the majority of members are millionaires.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 349: Bron/Broenin autistinen Saga sanoo hississä et rakastumisessa hyrrää hormoneja ja aivoissa vapautuu dopamiineja ym enforfiineja (joita muuten Saxikäden Olli syötti unitautisille vanhuxille herättääxeen ne sixi hetkexi että sai siitä saxittua bestsellerin). Ollin näköinen märkäsuinen tanskalainen panomies kysyy hississä onx se sulle vaan kemiaa. On se sullekin, se on tieteellisesti tutkittu, sano Saga. Voitasko me vaan olla hiljaa ehdottaa Mara. Aou sanoo Saga ja vaikenee.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 369: For more than 65 years, Dennis personally taught tens of thousands of people to play the game. But as the consummate “teacher of tennis teachers,” his influence in this sport extends to millions of recreational players around the world.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 371: I first met Dennis in 1987, when I joined TENNIS Magazine. Throughout the years, I worked closely with him on instruction stories, including the popular “Dennis on Tennis” series. His knowledge both impressed and astounded me, and when he got me out on the tennis court, his instruction was simply beyond compare.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 373: Dennis was born in 1933 in southern Africa. He played tournaments as a youngster, but at age 19, during a Davis Cup tryout in South Africa, he choked on a critical point. After that, his confidence flagged and his playing career stalled. His coach suggested he teach tennis to regain his confidence, and that’s all it took. He had also, as it turned out, found his calling.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 375: This led to the birth of TennisUniversity, aimed at developing top teaching pros. In 1976, to certify teaching pros and teach the Standard Method, Dennis founded the U.S. Professional Tennis Registry. Today the PTR has more than 16,300 members in 125 countries.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 471: This message is not supported by your version of Telegram. Please update to the latest version in Settings > Advanced, or install it
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 495: Familial dysautonomia (FD), also called Riley-Day syndrome, is an inherited disorder that affects the nervous system. The nerve fibers of people born with FD don't work properly. For this reason, they have trouble feeling pain, temperature, skin pressure and the position of their arms and legs.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 510: Jack Benny (born Benjamin Kubelsky; February 14, 1894 – December 26, 1974) was an American entertainer, who evolved from a modest success playing violin on the vaudeville circuit to a highly popular comedic career in radio, television and film. He was known for his comic timing and the ability to cause laughter with a pregnant pause or a single expression, such as his signature exasperated "Well! "
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 511: His radio and television programs, popular from 1932 until his death in 1974, were a major influence on the sitcom genre. Benny often portrayed his character as a miser who obliviously played his violin badly and ridiculously claimed to be 39 years of age, regardless of his actual age.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 513: Benny was born Benjamin Kubelsky in Chicago on February 14, 1894, and grew up in nearby Waukegan. He was the son of Jewish immigrants Meyer Kubelsky (1864–1946) and Emma Sachs Kubelsky (1869–1917), sometimes called "Naomi". Meyer was a saloon owner and later a haberdasher who had emigrated to America from Poland. Emma had emigrated from Lithuania. Benny began studying violin, an instrument that became his trademark, at the age of 6, his parents hoping for him to become a professional violinist. He loved the instrument, but hated practice. His music teacher was Otto Graham Sr., a neighbor and father of football player Otto Graham. At 14, Benny was playing in dance bands and his high school orchestra. He was a dreamer and poor at his studies, and was ultimately expelled from high school. He later did poorly in business school and at attempts to join his father´s business. In 1911, he began playing the violin in local vaudeville theaters for $7.50 a week (about $210 in 2020 dollars). He was joined on the circuit by Ned Miller, a young composer and singer.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 515: That same year, Benny was playing in the same theater as the young Marx Brothers. Minnie, their mother, enjoyed Benny´s violin playing and invited him to accompany her boys in their act. Benny´s parents refused to let their son go on the road at 17, but it was the beginning of his long friendship with the Marx Brothers, especially Zeppo Marx.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 517: The next year, Benny formed a vaudeville musical duo with pianist Cora Folsom Salisbury, a buxom 45-year-old divorcée who needed a partner for her act. This angered famous violinist Jan Kubelik, who feared that the young vaudevillian with a similar name would damage his reputation. Under legal pressure, Benjamin Kubelsky agreed to change his name to Ben K. Benny, sometimes spelled Bennie. When Salisbury left the act, Benny found a new pianist, Lyman Woods, and renamed the act "From Grand Opera to Ragtime". They worked together for five years and slowly integrated comedy elements into the show. They reached the Palace Theater, the "Mecca of Vaudeville," and did not do well. Benny left show business briefly in 1917 to join the United States Navy during World War I, and often entertained the sailors with his violin playing. One evening, his violin performance was booed by the sailors, so with prompting from fellow sailor and actor Pat O´Brien, he ad-libbed his way out of the jam and left them laughing. He received more comedy spots in the revues and did well, earning a reputation as a comedian and musician.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 519: Benny had some romantic encounters, including one with dancer Mary Kelly,[2]:23–24 whose devoutly Catholic family forced her to turn down his proposal because he was Jewish.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 521: old Sadie Marks (whose family was friends with, but not related to, the Marx family). Their first meeting did not go well when he tried to leave during Sadie´s violin performance.[2]:30–31 They met again in 1926. Jack had not remembered their earlier meeting and instantly fell for her.[2]:31 They married the following year. She was working in the hosiery section of the Hollywood Boulevard branch of the May Company, where Benny courted her.[2]:32 Called on to fill in for the "dumb girl" part in a Benny routine, Sadie proved to be a natural comedienne. Adopting the stage name Mary Livingstone, Sadie collaborated with Benny throughout most of his career. They later adopted a daughter, Joan (b. 1934). Her older sister Babe would be often the target of jokes about unattractive or masculine women, while her younger brother Hilliard would later produce Benny´s radio and TV work.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 523: After his broadcasting career ended, Benny performed live as a standup comedian.
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 527: In trying to explain his successful life, Benny summed it up by stating: "Everything good that happened to me happened by accident. I was not filled with ambition nor fired by a drive toward a clear-cut goal. I never knew exactly where I was going."
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 540: Marja ja Matti Tuhti kävivät Intiassa turistimatkalla viime vuosituhannella. Marja kirjoitti siitä matkakertomuxen Lehdykkään. Reportaashista ilmeni mm. seuraavaa. (Ei vaitiskaan. Ao. Lehdykän numeroa ei löydy. Lehdykän seuraavan numeron sisältöä: Kirjailija Kristina Carlsonin haastattelu.) "Iltalehti intialainen mies" hakusanoilla löytyy seuraavaa:
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 637: Floridalaismies leikkasi vaimonsa rakastajan peniksen irti – oikeus laski menetetylle miehisyydelle hinnan Tänään klo 1:01
    xxx/ellauri081.html on line 646: Miehisyyden menetykselle laskettiin hinta paxuuden ja pituuden mukaan.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 36: Both Hitler's oratory and Wittgenstein's philosophy of language derive from the hermetic tradition, the key to which is Wittgenstein's "no-ownership" theory of mind, described by P. F. Strawson in his book Individuals (1958). The no-ownership theory is a metaphysical doctrine of the self, labelled by Strawson. It arises from cartesian mind-body dualism (see mind body problem) and maintains that conscious experiences with a subject cannot be said to ‘belong’ to that subject, because “Only those things whose ownership is logically transferable can be owned at all“. Kauppamiesmäistä mind-body kapitalismia. Taas yxi kiemurtelu sielun irrottamisexi ruumiista.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 47: A. J. Balfour (UK Prime Minister who gives his name to the Balfour Declaration),
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 86: 28.3.2017.Ampuma-asedirektiivin uudistamisesta 1-5 (loputonta vekutusta pumppuhaulikoista) 11.3.2015.Vielä ö-luokan ehdokkaista (mamuvaaliehdokkaat ovat sekundaa) 3.3.2015. Hirveä työvoimapula (mamut on työllistämiskelvottomia ja/tai laiskiaisia) 9.2.2015. Muutama sana Pariisista (Islaminvastaista veistelyä Charlie Hebdosta) 8.1.2015. Ihmisoikeudet uhattuna länsinaapurissa (Pakolaiset ovat röyhkeitä ja nirsoja), 3.1.2015. 6.11.2014. Rajaseudun rahastajasta ja kompensatorisesta etiikasta (En tiedä, minkä lakipykälän mukaan rasismi olisi rikos), 11.9.2014. Rikkautta, jolla on arvoa (Olen kade somaleille), 23.8.2014.Uskonto uskontojen joukossa (Ellet rukoile, olet pahempi kuin kafferi), 19.5.2014.Kysymys kunnallisesta mamubisneksestä, 24.4.2014.Kommentti kehysriiheen ja Ylen toimintaan, 26.3.2014.Unionin tulevasta ampuma-asepolitiikasta, 10.3.2014. [Päivitys 17.3.!]Kirjallinen kysymys äärisaarnaajista Suomessa, 7.3.2014.Kirjallinen kysymys Ukrainan tapahtumiin liittyen, 4.3.2014.Lieksalainen ikiliikkuja, 18.2.2014.Lieksa käsirysyn partaalla, 10.2.2014. [Lisäys 12.2.2014!]EU, maahanmuutto, taakanjako, 16.1.2014.Toimeentuloperäistä maahanmuuttoa, 9.12.2013.Kuntarakenneuudistus eli kaksikielisyyttä saranapuolelta, 28.11.2013.Puheenvuoro asevelvollisuudesta, 15.11.2013.Kiihottamisesta ja kansainvälisistä sitoumuksista, 25.10.2013.Kirjallinen kysymys epäterveistä vetovoimatekijäistä, 7.10.2013.Pakolaiskiintiän kasvattaminen revisited, 30.9.2013.Kirjallinen kysymys pakolaiskiintiän kasvattamisesta, 20.9.2013.Luottamus Kataiseen ja Himaseen, 19.9.2013.Kaksi lakialoitetta sananvapauden edistämiseksi, 10.9.2013.Kansalaisaloite pakkoruotsista luopumiseksi, 15.8.2013.Kirkko, kaupunki ja moskeija, 13.8.2013.Lisääntykää ja täyttäkää Toyota Corolla!, 8.8.2013.Majoituspalveluja kerjäläisille, 5.6.2013.Husbyn herättämiä ajatuksia, 23.5.2013.Paperittomien terveyspalvelut Helsingissä, 7.5.2013.Sosialidemokratiasta ja islamismista, 3.5.2013.Puheenvuoro Kyproksen pelastuspakettiin 17.4. 2013, 18.4.2013.Kirjallinen kysymys opettajien toimintaedellytyksistä, 8.4.2013.Muutamia ilmoituksia, 5.4.2013.Helsingin johtajiston palkankorotuksista, osa 2, 12.3.2013.Suomen Sisun suurkäräjät 10.3.2013, 11.3.2013.Aseaiheisia lakialoitteita, 15.2.2013.Jyväskylästä, 6.2.2013.Connecticut, Yhdysvallat, aseet, 18.12.2012.Sisäministeriön linjaukset aselain uudistamiseksi, 5.12.2012.Kysymys uskontojen halventamisesta, 30.11.2012.Milloin kotoutus on onnistunut?, 1.11.2012.Rikoksiin syyllistyneiden karkottamisesta, 22.10.2012.Helsinki ja "Globaalin vastuun strategia", 28.9.2012.Kirjallinen kysymys somalien suojeluntarpeesta, 22.8.2012.Etninen syrjintä rekrytoinnissa, 21.8.2012.Avoimia vastauksia Meri Valkamalle, 4.6.2012.Hyvinkäästä, 30.5.2012.Kreikkalaisia näkymiä, 10.5.2012.Maahanmuuttajien työllistymisestä, 1.4.2012.Miksi pahis palkitaan?, 26.3.2012.Homoseksuaalisuus suojeluperusteena, 25.2.2012.Matka Addis Abebaan, 17.1.2012.On rotumme synkkä ja siksi jää, 13.1.2012.Mitä tehdä rattijuopoille?, 11.1.2012.Hyvää uutta vuotta 2012!, 8.12.2011.Tilastoista ja etnopositiivisuudesta, 26.10.2011.Rasismin kitkentää Vaasassa, 3.10.2011.Muutama ajatus kunniaväkivallasta, 30.9.2011.Ottawan sopimuksesta, 6.9.2011.Loikka, 13.8.2011.Viharikoksista ja mediasta,
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 197: Päädyin juristiksi puolivahingossa. Luulin pääseväni ylioppilastodistuksellani humanistiseen tiedekuntaan opiskelemaan filosofiaa ja historiaa, mutta minua ei hyväksytty sinne papereillani.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 228: Verkostomaisen kv telakkayhtiön telakasta Raumalla tuli spermalinko. Yhtiön päähämähäkki kertoo että miehistö on kohortoitu. Se on uusi peitenimi joukkohaudalle. Työntekijöistä 80% on ulkomaisia. Niille oli kerrottu suomeksi että karanteeni on vain viranomaissuositus. Joka ei ilmesty joukkokuljetuxiin saa kärsiä. Käytävällä eteenpäin. Laulua kolmannella. Mars mars.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 325: Pyramus and Thisbe (Greek)
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 345: Yudhishthira and Draupadi (Hindu)
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 365: Bohr is the father of the Complementarity Principle, a tenet in quantum physics stating that a complete knowledge of phenomena on atomic scale requires a description of both wave and particle properties. When Bohr was knighted for his work, he used the yin-yang symbol in his coat of arms and inscribed it with the words Contraria sunt complementa (opposites are complementary).
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 524: Ron Brown (Australialainen poliitikko) (1915-1992), Tasmanialainen poliitikko Ronald Brown (Englantilainen poliitikko) (1921-2002), Brittiparlamentin jäsen alueelta Hackney South and Shoreditch. Ron Brown (Skottilainen poliitikko) (1940-2007), Entinen Parlamentin Jäsen Leithistä Ron Brown (1941-1996), Yhdysvaltain Kauppasihteeri; Ron Brown (Wisconsinin poliitikko) (born 1946), Wisconsin ...
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 532: Jazz muusikko Ron Brownin bio, konsertti ja kierrostiedot, albumit, arvostelut, videot, valokuvat ja lissää.
    (This page intentionally left blank.)
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 538: Julkaissut yli 39 maassa Ron Brown myy rehkimäänsä keräilijöille ja vähittän läntisissä Yhdysvalloissa. Hänet nimitettiin erääxi 300 huippuartistista Utahissa. Näin miehen Nevadan autiomassa eräässä tienristeyxessä liftaamassa, keskellä ei mitään. Minun piti saada hänen tarinansa.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 594: Film critic André Bazin (1918-1958) is notable for arguing that realism is the most important function of cinema. His call for objective reality, deep focus, and lack of montage are linked to his belief that the interpretation of a film or scene should be left to the spectator. This placed him in opposition to film theory of the 1920s and 1930s, which emphasized how the cinema could manipulate reality.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 661: Hysterian käsitettä on kritisoitu paljon. Monet ovat olleet sitä mieltä, etteivät esimerkiksi Freudin ja Breurerin esittelemän historian kuuluisimman "hysteriapotilaan", kirjailija ja ihmisoikeusaktivisti Bertha Pappenheimin yskä, säryt ja aisti- sekä halvausoireet johtuneet konversiohäiriöstä vaan esimerkiksi aivotulehduksesta tai ohimolohkoepilepsiasta. Tätä epäilyä tukee muun muassa se, että toisin kuin Freud ja Breurer väittivät vuonna 1895 julkaistussa kirjassaan Tutkielmia hysteriasta, Pappenheim ei parantunut psykoanalyysin avulla, vaan meni lopulta niin huonoon kuntoon, että joutui kuukausiksi sairaalahoitoon.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 758: Aloitan tähän kenties pienen taulukon siitä mitkä viihdepläjäyxet läpäisevät Bechdelin testin. Bechdelin testin läpäisee jos pläjäyxessä on a) vähintään 2 naista b) joilla on puheosia c) jotka puhuvat jotain keskenään d) ja puhuvat silloin jostain muusta kuin miehistä.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 765: Suru ja sääli on Marcel Ophülsin ohjaama pitkä dokumenttielokuva vuodelta 1969. Elokuva käsittelee toisen maailmansodan aikaista Ranskaa ja sen vastarintaliikkeen historiaa. Siinä on leikattu yhteen 1960-luvulla tehtyjä haastatteluja ja uutisfilmejä 1940-luvulta. The New York Timesin kriitikot valitsivat Surun ja säälin vuonna 2004 yhdeksi kaikkien aikojen tuhannesta parhaasta elokuvasta maailmassa.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 803: A new pastor arrives in a stark Vermont village and is intrigued by crippled, misshapen Ethan Frome living on an isolated, hardscrabble farm with his sickly wife Zeena.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 807: Ethan and Mattie agree to do the CJ/Ebba trick and hit a tree with sled. Mattie chirps like a little animal. Ethan breaks his tool for good.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 828: from A Few Figs from Thistles (1920)
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 830: Susan Alexandra "Sigourney" Weaver (/ s ɪ ˈ ɡ ɔːr n i /; born October 8, 1949) is an American actress. Weaver is considered to be a pioneer of action heroines in science fiction films. She is known for her role as Ellen Ripley which earned her an Academy Award nomination in 1986 and is often regarded as one of the most significant female protagonists in cinema history. Her most famous co-star was the Alien.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 832: More and more celebrities admit every year that they are gay, but this is not the case with Sigourney Weaver since this celebrity never said so. In any case, celebrities many times refuse to talk about their private lives, so we never know if they are gay or straight.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 834: "Halkopino" Wilson oli vasemmistolainen white supremacist, et revi siitä silavaa. Eedit ei tykännyt anglosaxisista naisista, eikä miehistä (paizi Wilsonista), se piti pariisilaisista. Wallu kazoi varmaan Frome-filmin kun se tuli ulos, ja teki Don Gatelystä vähän samanoloisen.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 59: The product was sold by Clinton Odell and his sons Leonard and Allan, who formed the Burma-Vita Company, named for a liniment that was the company’s first product. The Odells were not making money on Burma-Vita, and wanted to sell a product that people would use daily. A wholesale drug company in Minneapolis, Minnesota, where the company was located, told Clinton Odell about Lloyd’s Euxesis, a British product that was the first brushless shaving cream made, but which was of poor quality. Clinton Odell hired a chemist named Carl Noren to produce a quality shaving cream and after 43 attempts, Burma-Shave was born.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 63: In the fall of 1925, the first sets of Burma-Shave signs were erected on two highways leading out of Minneapolis. Sales rose dramatically in the area, and the signs soon appeared nationwide. The next year, Allan and his brother Leonard set up more signs, spreading across Minnesota and into Wisconsin, spending $25,000 that year on signs. Orders poured in, and sales for the year hit $68,000.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 67: This use of the billboards was a highly successful advertising gimmick, drawing attention to passers-by who were curious to discover the punch line. Within a decade, Burma-Shave was the second most popular brand of shaving cream in the United States.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 83: Within this vale
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 90: Clinton Odell, the founder of the company, died in 1958. Allan Odell, who came up with the sign idea, passed away in 1994, and his brother Leonard, in 1991.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 96: We use cookies. Our cookies are delicious. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. (Last Privacy Policy Update July 2020) Dismiss Privacy policy
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 106: If it is a surprise to learn that Lawrence originally conceived of Women in Love as a money-making pot-boiler, it comes as an endearing shock to read that James Joyce submitted some of his early work to the firm of Mills and Boon. There is no record of the reader’s report, beyond the fact that he rejected Dubliners as unsuitable material for the unique imprint of that publishing house. For his part, Lawrence had no doubt that the author of Ulysses was the real smutmonger of modern fiction. ‘My God, what a clumsy olla putrida James Joyce is!’, he wrote to Aldous Huxley, ‘nothing but old fags and cabbage-stumps of quotations from the Bible and the rest stewed in the juice of deliberate journalistic dirty-mindedness.’ To his wife Frieda he wrote, after reading Ulysses, that ‘the last part of it is the dirtiest, most indecent, obscene thing ever written’; and he later complained that Joyce had degraded the novel to the level of an instrument for measuring twinges in the toes of unremarkable men. Joyce’s reply to the charge that he was just another pornographer doing dirt on sex was to claim that at least he had never made the subject predictable or boring. He denounced Lady Chatterbox’s Lover — his title for Lawrence’s notorious novel — as a ‘lush’ production in ‘sloppy English’ and dismissed its ending as ‘a piece of propaganda in favour of something which, outside of DHL’s country at any rate, makes all the propaganda for itself’. It is a minor irony of literary history that both men were married at Kensington Register Office in London, although, unlike Lawrence, the Irishman allowed a decent interval of twenty-five years to elapse before the solemnisation of his nuptials.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 118: Plot Summary: A soundless mix of story fragments and images. Initially, images of death, a man with a guitar, a soirée. Some images are surreal: an older woman eats a leaf; a headless man pours a cocktail into his body. A woman in white walks toward a building, isolated and in ruins, where a man waits. Then more images, some in reflections, some distorted, many in close-ups: women's feet in high heels, two bare feet at play, a snail, a knife, a mask, a woman mugging next to it. Women provocatively dance. A woman's face, staring without affect, rises partially out of water. Now wearing a dark jacket, the woman in white runs as if for her life. Is death at hand, or just images?
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 126: A 2007 comic strip by Dave Kiersh in Syncopated Volume 3 (Syncopated Comics, 2007) tells of his relationship with Peterson, who was a friend of Kiersh's grandmother.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 128: Similarly to the film ‘ Potted Psalm’ (made by the same filmmaker) ‘The Cage’ was firstly created with no soundtrack. A soundtrack was added later on to accompany the visuals. The copy right of this film belongs to the Californian School of Fine Arts.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 145: Dave Voorhis
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 147: Dave Voorhis, Software entrepreneur, comp sci academic, software engineer.

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 163: Anti-Oidipus (ransk. L’Anti-Œdipe) on ranskalaisen filosofin Gilles Deleuzen ja psykoanalyytikon Félix Guattarin vuonna 1972 julkaisema kirja, joka kyseenalaistaa sekä filosofian että psykoanalyysin ja ehdottaa tilalle ”skitsoanalyysia”. Kirja on ”Kapitalismi ja skitsofrenia” -sarjan ensimmäinen osa (toinen osa Mille plateaux ilmestyi 1980). Anti-Oidipuksessa Deleuze ja Guattari luovat eklektisen selvityksen psykologiasta, taloustieteestä, yhteiskunnasta ja historiasta sekä näyttävät, miten ”primitiivinen”, ”despoottinen” ja ”kapitalistinen” aikakausi eroavat toisistaan ”tuotannon”, ”rekisteröimisen” ja ”kulutuksen” organisoinnin suhteen. Deleuze ja Guattari väittävät kuvaavansa, miten kapitalismi kanavoi halut aksiomaattisen, rahapohjaisen talouden kautta. Aksiomaattinen rahatalous on yksipuolinen organisaatiomuoto, joka on abstrakti, ei-paikallinen ja ei-materiaalinen.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 169: This essay offers a close analysis of one particular character in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest: Kate Gompert, a suicidal marijuana addict afflicted with “psychotic depression.”
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 173: “Yevtuschenko” is likely an allusion to Soviet-Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko, who never produced a textbook on clinical psychology. But it's fascinating—throughout Infinite Jest, Wallace and his characters consistently attribute fabricated texts to real people! See, for example, “Gilles Deleuze's posthumous Incest and the Life of Death in Capitalist Entertainment” (792).
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 177: In one of the more disturbing case histories in the novel, a stable father/husband begins obsessing over the television program M*A*S*H (taking meticulous and incoherent notes), gradually losing his mind speaking only in cryptic references to M*A*S*H and sending letters to the characters, not the actors!
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 201: 3.4M content views 1M this month Active in 4 Spaces

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 225: So this brings me to my first point, finding a job or another workplace or something that you enjoy and CAN GET PAID FOR IT.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 231: How can you even spend time thinking about the person you want to be when all you can think about is how shit this job is?
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 235: Get yourself out of this “tired of going to work” type situation, and let your new environment and new psyche inspire you with something worthwhile for YOU TO ASPIRE TOWARDS.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 237: For more personal answers around this topic, follow me on quora! If I'm lucky and you are stupid enough, I can wriggle myself inside your pocket-book, so my dreams can suck up yours like a leech.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 247: A few weeks later pictures emerged of the famous CEO and his girlfriend cavorting in Japan. I guess even alleged 16 hour a day, 7 days a week workaholics take vacations…
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 248: So maybe the famous CEO wasn’t lying. Maybe what he really meant to say was that even when he was officially working, his brain was taking a vacation.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 255: Good answers here... I think another perspective to always consider for matters like this is there is a HUGE difference between responsibility and effort.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 256: At this level almost all the responsibility will probably end up on them because they are the highest in the hierarchy. However that doesn't mean they put forth the most effort. Not by far.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 264: Mark Cuban for example does this. There are many facts to his beginning and journey that are not exactly moral or success related but now hes in a position to say whatever he wants and relate everything as a direct result of his effort, ability and contributions and supposedly working harder than everyone else. He just likes to hear himself talk like many of these types do.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 280: Yes, Jordan Peterson suffers from depression, it has been a recurrent condition since he was 13. He reports that his father and paternal grandfather also suffered from depression.... Read More »
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 281: Jordan Bernt Peterson (born 12 June 1962) is a Canadian YouTube personality, clinical psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. He began to receive widespread attention in the late 2010s for his views on cultural and political issues.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 283: For most of his career, Peterson maintained a clinical practice, seeing about 20 people a week. He has been active on social media, and in September 2016 he released a series of videos in which he criticized Bill C-16 which proposed to add "gender identity or expression" as a prohibited ground of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act, and to similarly expand the definitions of promoting genocide and publicly inciting hatred in the hate speech laws in Canada.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 285: As a result of new projects, he decided to put the clinical practice on hold in 2017 and temporarily stopped teaching as of 2018. In February 2018, Peterson entered into a promise with the College of Psychologists of Ontario after a professional misconduct complaint about his communication and the boundaries he sets with his patients. The College did not consider a full disciplinary hearing necessary and accepted Peterson entering into a three-month undertaking to work on prioritizing his practice and improving his patient communications. Peterson had no prior disciplinary punishments or restrictions on his clinical practice.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 287: Peterson has characterized himself politically as a "classic British liberal", and as a "traditionalist". He has stated that he is commonly mistaken to be right-wing. Yoram Hazony wrote in The Wall Street Journal that "[t]he startling success of his elevated arguments for the importance of order has made him the most significant conservative thinker to appear in the English-speaking world in a generation. Peterson says that an "analysis of the world's religious ideas might allow us to describe our essential morality and eventually develop a universal system of morality."
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 292: In response to the controversy, academic administrators at the University of Toronto sent Peterson two letters of warning, one noting that free speech had to be made in accordance with human rights legislation, and the other adding that his refusal to use the preferred personal pronouns of students and faculty upon request could constitute discrimination. Peterson speculated that these warning letters were leading up to formal disciplinary action against him, but in December the university assured him he would retain his professorship, and in January 2017 he returned to teach his psychology class at the University of Toronto.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 297: Peterson married Tammy Roberts in 1989;[10] the couple have a daughter, Mikhaila, and a son, Julian. Following Peterson's rise to fame, his daughter Mikhaila has built an online following herself and offers dietary advice of only eating meat.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 299: n 2016, Peterson had a severe depression and was prescribed clonazepam. In late 2016, he went on a strict diet consisting only of meat and some vegetables, in an attempt to control his severe depression and the effects of an autoimmune disorder including psoriasis and uveitis. In mid-2018, he stopped eating vegetables at all, and continued eating only beef (carnivore diet).
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 301: In April 2019, his prescribed dosage of clonazepam was increased to deal with the anxiety he was experiencing as a result of his wife's cancer diagnosis. Starting several months later, he made various attempts to lessen his drug intake, or stop taking drugs altogether, but experienced "horrific" withdrawal syndrome, including akathisia, described by his daughter as "incredible, endless, irresistible restlessness, bordering on panic". According to his daughter, Peterson and his family were unable to find doctors in North America who were willing to accommodate their treatment desires, so in January 2020, Peterson, his daughter and her husband flew to Moscow, Russia for treatment. Neo-Marxist doctors there diagnosed Peterson with pneumonia in both lungs upon arrival, and he was put into a medically induced coma for eight days. Peterson spent four weeks in the intensive care unit, during which time he allegedly exhibited a temporary loss of any remaining skills. Unfortunately, he was resuscitated, unnecessarily.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 303: Several months after his treatment in Russia, Peterson and his family moved to Belgrade, Serbia for further treatment. In June 2020, Peterson made his first public appearance in over a year, when he appeared on his daughter's podcast, recorded in Communist Belgrade. He said that he was "back to my regular self", other than feeling fatigue, and was cautiously optimistic about his prospects. He also said that he wanted to warn people about the dangers of long-term use of benzodiazepines (the class of drugs that includes clonazepam). In August 2020, his daughter announced that her father had contracted COVID-19 during his hospital stay in Serbia. Two months later, Peterson posted a YouTube video to inform that he had returned home and aimed to resume his destructive work in the near future.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 309: If so, can anybody actually name a tenured professor to which this has actually happened?

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 320:
    If you haven’t guessed it yet, this is Jeff Bezos (owner of Amazon) in 1999 - and, no, this is not the start of Amazon. In 1999, Amazon was already worth billion(s) of dollars, and yet this man is sitting in a not-so-fancy office, doing what people won’t do so he could be able to do what people MUSTN’T do. Like fuck up the life of everybody else.

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 329: And here’s an even better question than the first one: Why would the idea continue to have so much currency despite having absolutely no demonstrable basis for belief? And the great Upton Sinclair gave us the answer to that one: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it.”
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 348:
    View 100+ other answers to this question

    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 355: This has a two part answer. The first is, that it assumes that businesses are started and then expanded for the purpose of creating jobs and advancing the working class. This simply is not true. When a person opens a business, their entire purpose is to earn a profit. Not a single multimillionaire has ever said “I think we need more jobs and better wages, so I think we should open another facility.” This can be documented with the exodus of American business to coutries such as Mexico, China, and Japan, just to name a few. They were NOT trying to create jobs in those countries. They were trying to increase profits. There are any number of counties, cities, and states that are held hostage by big business demanding tax abatements and other concessions if they agree to do business and maybe create jobs in those areas. So you see, big business is not about helping the little guy…it is about how much profit they can make with a PROMISE to help the little guy.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 357: So here is what happens with the “Trickle Down Economics”…. Unlike the working class that, when they get an extra couple of hundred bucks immediately goes out and spends it and helps the entire economy, those at the top of the ladder tend to invest that money. So…. The “Trickle down Economics” theory says that if we give the top 1% more money, through tax breaks, tax credits, or even credits, they will then pass that money on to their employees and servants. This simply isn't true. If it were, they would already be sharing their profits with the working class.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 359: What happens is this.. Give a blue collar worker $2000 and he will buy new furniture, or clothing, ir maybe put a down payment on a new car. He will definitely take his family out to dinner and a movie, therefore stimulating the economy. However, those in charge of the companies will not do this. They already have their purchases, parties, dinners, and vacations planned and payed for. When they get an extra $2000 or $200,000 they keep it. They purchase more stock ir perhaps an insurance policy. Maybe they just stick it into a CD. In any case they are NOT helping the economy or even interested in doing so.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 367: Most people who talk about “Trickle Down not working” are concerned with absolute, rather than relative income. So if you earn $10 more and your neighbor earns $1000 more under this paradigm you are worse off because you theoretically might have gotten a chunk of the extra your rich fat neighbor made although percentwise you get about the same profit. The thing is: advocates of supply side economics are working from a different paradigm where THEIR wages is the more important thing. Don't buy another bottle of olive oil before seeing this.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 380: Every single bit of wealth you have, from your socks, to your car, to your house, to the heating and electricity you use….. all of it… likely came from a wealthy person. Come to think of it, isn't the almighty God an almighty wealthy person par excellence? Everything you got is from his hand, and you gotta pay for it through your nose.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 383: Even my barber, which is a self employed hair cutter. Would his business exist without rich people? Would it? Where would he get to rent a building to run his barber show out of? Where did the power come from? Where did his trimmers and hair cutters come from? Where did he buy that barber chair from?
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 398: And that’s usually where that thought experiment ends. But let’s keep going with the scenario with low taxes, shall we? After a long time of this pattern, this sandwich shop might turn into a large chain. They’re above the struggle to survive that they started in, and other sandwich shops can’t easily take away a large portion of their customers. It becomes quite expensive to try and out-compete them. But competition is also expensive on their end. And then the owner of this shop starts to think “now wait a minute… I raise the starting wage of my workers and lower my prices, and then everyone else does the same, until eventually, I’m forced to do it again. But that second time, and every time afterwards, I’m not getting more customers or more efficient workers, I’m competing with the other companies to try to maintain what I already have, with less and less profit. And the same is true for everyone I’m competing with. What if I talked to all the other big chains in this area, and we all agreed to keep about the same starting wage and price? That way we ALL make more money.” And now those lower taxes have no effect on price or wages, all that extra money becomes profit.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 400: But profit increases the number of people they employ, right? Sometimes, but this becomes less and less true the bigger a business gets. If a business gets big enough, they might fill their niche completely. For a smaller business, expanding is often a good investment, but there comes a point where that’s not really going to make you that much more money. The people who want to go to your stores might already be going to your stores about as much as they want to, so you don’t need to hire anyone else, or open a new location. So now all that profit goes to…the people who own the company. If the company can’t make any more money by expanding, they usually decide that they just give all of their executives a raise.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 407:
    “No such theory has been found in even the most voluminous and learned histories of economic theories, including J.A. Schumpeter’s monumental 1,260-page History of Economic Analysis. Yet this non-existent theory* has become the object of denunciations from the pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post to the political arena. It has been attacked by Professor Paul Krugman of Princeton and Professor Peter Corning of Stanford, among others, and similar attacks have been repeated as far away as India. It is a classic example of arguing against a caricature instead of confronting the argument actually made.”
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 411: Um, no, no one is saying that. The idea is hilarious. This is where it goes wrong: Govt taking a little less from the rich than before is not a gift! It was THEIR money in the first place. How did we ever get to the place where people think that everything belongs to the govt like a king in feudal and ancient times, and we are all just subjects, serfs, and they will tell US how much of our own earnings we get to keep? Didn't we fight a revolution to abolish that nonsense?
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 417: This process of shelling out cash, and losing money can go on FOR YEARS as it did with Amazon, and many, most, companies fail in the first 5 years and employees go on to a new job while the owners and investors are out ALL the money they put in. Employees get paid the whole time, owners get paid ONLY if there is a profit and last. Profits trickle UP, not down, last IF at all!
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 457: Because it assumes that rich people automatically create more jobs if they have more money. This idea ignores the reason why jobs are created in the first place: to make profit. Which means that new jobs are only created if they are profitable to the employer. If all the jobs that could be created aren’t, it doesn’t matter how much money the employer has. And therefore giving the employer more money in such a situation will not lead to more jobs being created.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 459: If there are profitable jobs to be created and employers don’t have the money to start it off they could take out a loan and pay it off with the profit. There simply is no situation left where lowering the rich’s taxes would create jobs. But we don’t have to rely on this argument, we can look at the many times where this was tried and, guess what: lowering the rich’s taxes has never created more jobs.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 461: It however of course will make the rich richer without any risk, effort or investment and that is the reason why they are lying to you about this. The reason is greed, nothing more.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 466: It works well for a small rich elite, but for the majority and more importantly for the national economy? Well it has never worked in the past why assume that it would work now? This is a con perpetuated by the wealthy elite to keep more of the money they earn and give less of it to the government. Concentrating wealth in the hands of a few is actually really really bad for the economy. Less of it circulates. The poor/middle classes tend to spend everything they get, they can't not, they just have less disposable income. It tends to go on food, rent and essentials. If they don't have enough money to spend because a greater slice of the pie is tied up in fewer hands they don't have as much to spend and less money circulates through the economy. That is bad. They don't squirrel it away in the Bahamas or Swiss bank accounts or spend it on a second Ferrari Testarossa. They don't have that luxury. The myth of trickle down economics was discredited years ago.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 495: “This escalation of CEO compensation, and of executive compensation more generally, has fueled the growth of top 1% and top 0.1% incomes, leaving less of the fruits of economic growth for ordinary workers and widening the gap between very high earners and the bottom 90%,” the report concluded.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 497: This, of course, is magical thinking. Yet it has served as the intellectual basis of virtually all Republican economic policies since the 1970s, and was the primary justification for the party’s most recent tax cuts for wealthy corporations and individuals.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 499: On Sunday, President Trump dismissed growing speculation about a recession by insisting his tax cuts, and the miracle of trickle-down prosperity, will keep the economy humming.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 501: In fact, consumer sentiment fell this month to the lowest level of the year.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 517: White House economic advisor Larry Kudlow told Fox News on Sunday this is precisely what the Trump administration is considering.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 543: President Trump sold his 2017 tax cuts as “rocket fuel” for the economy, arguing that freeing up money for the wealthy would allow them to hire more workers, pay better wages and invest more. The tax savings, in other words, would trickle down from the rich to everyone else.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 547: According to one of the most comprehensive studies to date on tax cuts for the rich, this should come as no surprise. A London School of Economics report by David Hope and Julian Limberg examined five decades of tax cuts in 18 wealthy nations and found they consistently benefited the wealthy but had no meaningful effect on unemployment or economic growth.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 551: While previous studies on the effects of taxing the rich have tended to focus on just one type of tax, “our measure combines all of these important taxes on the rich into one indicator,” Hope and Limberg said in an email. “This provides a more complete picture of taxes on the rich, but it also allows for comparisons across countries and over time.”
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 553: Using this measure, they set out to identify “major” tax cuts on the rich in 18 wealthy nations from 1965 to 2015. In the United States, that included the Reagan-era tax cuts of 1981 and 1986, which dramatically reduced the top income tax rate from 70 percent to 28 percent after fully taking effect.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 565: “In the last decade, especially with the pioneering work of Thomas Piketty and his co-authors, there has been a growing consensus that tax cuts for the rich lead to higher income inequality,” Hope and Limberg said. Piketty, a French economist, wrote “Capital in the Twenty-First Century,” a book on the growth of inequality in rich nations.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 577: Given the historically low tax burdens on the wealthy in the United States, their ability to pay for higher taxes has probably never been better.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 585: At this point, unless we allow millions more immigrants into our country, thereby expanding the workforce, economic growth will be sluggish. There is plenty of wealth being created, but it is often in too few hands. Government spending generally has far less velocity due to more and more people having less disposable income. The elitists in the U.S. embarked on this globalist philosophy 30–40 years ago and there has been significant economic growth worldwide, but that has been at the expense of the American worker and to some degree our way of life. The introduction of massive amounts of consumer credit has only made things worse.
    xxx/ellauri085.html on line 587: I am not saying I have all the answers, because I don’t. But if I could wave a magic wand over our country, this is what I would do.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 75: About Lindsfarne Gospels Bede explains how each of the four Evangelists was represented by their own symbol: Matthew was the man, representing the human Christ; Mark was the lion, symbolising the triumphant Christ of the Resurrection; Luke was the calf, symbolising the sacrificial victim of the Crucifixion; and John was the eagle, symbolising Christ's second coming. A collective term for the symbols of the four Evangelists is the Tetramorphs. Each of the four Evangelists is accompanied by their respective symbol in their miniature portraits in the manuscript. In these portraits, Matthew, Mark, and Luke are shown writing, while John looks straight ahead at the reader holding his scroll. The Evangelists also represent the dual nature of Christ. Mark and John are shown as young men, symbolising the divine nature of Christ, and Matthew and Luke appear older and bearded, representing Christ's mortal nature.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 83: ONAN, as almost everybody knows, was killed by God for the heinous crime of "spilling his seed upon the ground". This, throughout history, has associated him with masturbation, beginning with the writings of Clement of Alexandria. And I agree, that when DFW mentions O.N.A.N., that connotation is implied. But that's not why God was mad at Onan. If you go read the whole sordid story in Genesis 38: when God killed Onan's brother, for reasons which are a bit obscure, leaving his widow childless, it was the custom that Onan was required to marry her and father a child upon her. This child would legally be his brother's. This was known as Levirate marriage. Onan didn't want any children who weren't legally his, so Onan "went in" to his brother's wife but pulled out early and "spilled his seed on the ground". So Onan's real sin was refusing to Consumate his Levirate Marriage. Now, once God whacked Onan, his widow had to wait for his remaining brother to grow up. But she got tired of waiting and put on a veil(!!!!) and tricked Onan's father into having sex with her. So a painting of the "Consummation of the Levirates" might be Onan's father banging his sons' wife....
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 87: Suuhunsopiva kulli seisoi kuolasta liukkaana vasten häpyhuuliani. Riisuin huntuni ja hänmies nykäisi varovasti stringejäni ja suuteli rintojani – niitä ei niinkään varovasti. Riisuin housuni ja annoin lämpimän hävyn hieroa pystyssä sojottavan kullin kärkeä. Häpyhuulet avautuivat itsestään ja kosteus valui ulos ja päästi kullin hitaasti uppoamaan sisäänsä. Ratsastin, mutta minut pysäytettiin, ratsastin taas ja hänmies nousi istualleen estääkseen minua. Hieroin itseäni hitaasti pitkin kullin vartta saaden hänet izensä ähisemään ja kiroamaan lisää. Hänmies yritti pitää minua voimalla, mutta hankasin vastaan aivan pienellä liikkeellä. En voinut sille mitään, miten paljon nautin tilanteesta. Hänmies oli aivan kiimassa, aivan tuloillaan koko ajan, mutta kesti.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 212: Herra avatkoon. Herra paratkoon. Herra hallitkoon. Jumal'antakoon. Kissa vieköön. Hissun kissun hissun kissun. Hokkuspokkus. Kost'jumala. Kies'avita. Sussiunakkoon. Jösses.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 220: Paul is no clearer about this in Ephesians 4:29: “Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths." Are genitals unwholesome?
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 226: Was this Article Helpful?
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 230: Smoking is not expressly forbidden anywhere in the Bible. There is a veritable who’s who list of Christians who smoked. One of the greatest preachers and evangelists of the 19th century loved his cigars. He was Charles Spurgeon. Other famous Christians who smoked or still do are J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Chuck Colson, Johann Sebastian Bach, Billy Graham, and Jerry Farwell (although the last two quit in their latter years). This article has addressed all types of tobacco: cigarettes, pipe, cigar, snuff, and chewing tobacco. Come to think of it, all these famous Christians are dead. Put that in your pipe and smoke.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 236: Jesus is the Son of God. Jesus is triumphant over unclean spirits. Jesus liberates the captive, and gives hope to hopeless people — even Gentile people. But Jesus demands a choice: love him and his salvation, or love your prosperity and your wealth — namely, your pigs. Don't try it yourself at home.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 240: There are many gray areas in a Christian’s life. In this respect, Islam is better, it has a rule for every contingency.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 242: There actually are some references on tattoos in Leviticus 19:28: “Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves. I am the LORD." But what about tattoos for the living? A tattoo saying "I am the LORD?" Swearing not falsely but truly? Oh, this is really a can of worms.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 363: In essence Keynes finds that Moore's apostles adopted his religion meaning one's attitudes towards oneself and the ultimate (Mr. Moore), but ignored his morals, whatever they might be, besides taking in pretty boys from behind like Socrates. What are they pray? Let's give G.E. himself the floor!
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 365: It appears to me that in Ethics, as in all other philosophical studies, the difficulties and disagreements, of which its history is full, are mainly due to a very simple cause: namely to the attempt to answer questions, without first discovering precisely what question it is which you desire to answer.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 412: In October 2016, investigative reporter Claudio Gatti published an article jointly in Il Sole 24 Ore and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, that relied on financial records related to real estate transactions and royalties payments to draw the conclusion that Anita Raja, a Rome-based translator, is the real author behind the Ferrante pseudonym. Gatti's article was criticized by many in the literary world as a violation of privacy, though Gatti contends that "by announcing that she would lie on occasion, Ferrante has in a way relinquished her right to disappear behind her books and let them live and grow while their author remained unknown. Indeed, she and her publisher seemed to have fed public interest in her true identity." British novelist Matt Haig tweeted, "Think the pursuit to discover the 'real' Elena Ferrante is a disgrace and also pointless. A writer's truest self is the books they write." The writer Jeanette Winterson, in a Guardian article, denounced Gatti's investigations as malicious and sexist, saying "At the bottom of this so-called investigation into Ferrante's identity is an obsessional outrage at the success of a writer – female – who decided to write, publish and promote her books on her own terms." She went on to say that the desire to uncover Ferrante's identity constitutes an act of sexism in itself, and that "Italy is still a Catholic country with strong patriarchial attitudes towards women." Others responding to Gatti's article suggested that knowledge of Ferrante's biography is indeed relevant.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 428: Pickering: Tonight, old man, you did it! Henry: Yes.He was there, all right. And up to his old tricks.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 431: I doubted you'd do it. But now I must admit it He made it the devilish business of his
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 432: That succeed you did. You should get a medal "To find out who this Miss Doolittle is."
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 438: Pickering: All alone you hurdled Not to let him have his chance with her.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 441: Pickering: Tonight, old man, you did it! He oiled his way around the floor.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 474: Asked to meet her, You'll be mentioned in history! Rest of Servants
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 475: And gave his arm to lead her to the floor...! I said to him: (Simultaneously) Congratulations, Professor Higgins!
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 480: That you did it! This evening, sir, you did it! You did it! You did it!
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 482: Henry: Thank Heavens for Zoltán Karpáthy. This evening, sir, you did it! You did it! You did it!
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 497: Viimeisin tvistaus aivan lähihistorian intriigeimmässä kirjallisessa whodunitissa, unkarilainen foneetikko sanoo että Ferranten liian moitteeton ääntämys osoittaa sen olevan - ei enempää eikä vähempää kuin - Hungarian! Ei vaitiskaan, vaan köyhä italialainen kääntäjä Anita Kenkäraja - puolanjuutalaisen äidin ja napolilaisen isän lapsi.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 513: Vitas Gerulaitis was some stupid Lithuanian immigrant tennis player in the 80's who died of carbon monoxide poisoning in his pool. During a tennis match, didn't the late tennis great Vitas Gerulaitis tell a Jewish umpire who had ruled against him, "You should be exterminated in a crematorium?" Well, this isn't precisely the same wording as your quote, but the meaning is similar:
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 586: If Kip humped his dreamgirl Peewee it would count as statutory rape. I'm sure Bob would shut an understanding eye to that. If the wormfaces ate up them both that would count as a mutton snack. Bob would not countenance anything like that. We are people, not some animals like sheep, or hobgoblins either, come to that. You gotta choose your team, and stick to them. George Byron would not agree, nor do I.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 597: "I love this. I've sent myself 5 letters so far and every year it's a surprise. Because I forget so easily. It turns into such a deep reflective process, that I usually weep and laugh while I write." - Margaret Member since 2011.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 608: "The Purloined Letter" is a short story by American author Edgar Allan Poe. It is the third of his three detective stories featuring the fictional C. Auguste Dupin, the other two being "The Murders in the Rue Morgue" and "The Mystery of Marie Rogêt". These stories are considered to be important early forerunners of the modern detective story. It first appeared in the literary annual The Gift for 1845 (1844) and soon was reprinted in numerous journals and newspapers.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 617: The contents of the letter have not been revealed, as this would have led to certain circumstances that have not arisen. Therefore, Minister D— still has the letter in his possession.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 621: The prefect says that he and his police detectives have searched D-'s town house and have found nothing. They checked behind the wallpaper and under the carpets. His men have examined the tables and chairs with magnifying glasses and then probed the cushions with needles but have found no sign of interference; the letter is not hidden in these places. Dupin asks the prefect if he knows what he is seeking, and the prefect reads a minute description of the letter, which Dupin memorizes. The prefect then bids them good day.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 623: A month later, the prefect returns, still unsuccessful in his search. He is motivated to continue his fruitless search by the promise of a large reward, recently doubled, upon the letter's safe return, and he will pay 50,000 francs to anyone who can help him. Dupin asks him to write that check now and he will give him the letter. The prefect is astonished, but knows that Dupin is not joking. He writes the check, and Dupin produces the letter. The prefect determines that it is genuine and races to deliver it to the queen.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 625: Alone together, the narrator asks Dupin how he found the letter. Dupin explains the Paris police are competent within their limitations, but have underestimated with whom they are dealing. The prefect mistakes the Minister D— for a fool because he is a poet. (Siis kumpi on? Perfekti vai ministeri Dee? No Poe on ainakin, senhän sanoo nimikin, Poe-t. Ja hölmökin se on.) For example, Dupin explains how an eight-year-old boy made a small fortune from his friends at a game called Odds and Evens. The boy had determined the intelligence of his opponents and played upon that to interpret their next move. Tästä aiheesta on valtava amer. kirjallisuus, koskien vangin dilemman toistoja. He explains that D— knew the police detectives would have assumed that the blackmailer would have concealed the letter in an elaborate hiding place, and thus hid it in plain sight.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 630: Dupin says he had visited the minister at his hotel. Complaining of weak eyes he wore a pair of green spectacles, the true purpose of which was to disguise his eyes as he searched for the letter. In a cheap card rack hanging from a dirty ribbon, he saw a half-torn letter and recognized it as the letter of the story's title. Striking up a conversation with D— about a subject in which the minister is interested, Dupin examined the letter more closely. It did not resemble the letter the prefect described so minutely; the writing was different, and it was sealed not with the "ducal arms" of the S— family, but with D—'s monogram. Dupin noticed that the paper was chafed as if the stiff paper was first rolled one way and then another. Dupin concluded that D— wrote a new address on the reverse of the stolen one, re-folded it the opposite way and sealed it with his own seal.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 634: Dupin explains that the gunshot distraction was arranged by him and that he left a duplicate letter to ensure his ability to leave the hotel without D— suspecting his actions. If he had tried to seize it openly, Dupin surmises D— might have had him killed. As both a political supporter of the queen and old enemy of the minister [who had done an evil deed to Dupin in Vienna in the past], Dupin also hopes that D— will try to use the power he no longer has, to his political downfall, and at the end be presented with a quotation from Prosper Jolyot de Crébillon's play Atrée et Thyeste that implies Dupin was the thief: Un dessein si funeste, S'il n'est digne d'Atrée, est digne de Thyeste (If such a sinister design isn't worthy of Atreus, it is worthy of Thyestes).
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 646: Atreus then learned of Thyestes' and Aerope's adultery and plotted revenge. He killed Thyestes' sons and cooked them, save their hands and heads. He served Thyestes his own sons and then taunted him with their hands and heads. This is the source of modern phrase "Thyestean Feast," or one at which human flesh is served. When Thyestes was done with his feast, he released a loud belch, which represents satiety and pleasure and his loss of self-control.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 650: An oracle then advised Thyestes that, if he had a son with his own daughter Pelopia, that son would kill Atreus. Thyestes did so by raping Pelopia (his identity hidden from her) and the son, Aegisthus, did kill Atreus. However, when Aegisthus was first born, he was abandoned by his mother, ashamed of the origin of her son. A shepherd found the infant Aegisthus and gave him to Atreus, who raised him as his own son. Only as he entered adulthood did Thyestes reveal the truth to Aegisthus, that he was both father and grandfather to the boy and that Atreus was his uncle. Aegisthus then killed Atreus.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 662: The Scarlet Letter: A Romance is a work of historical fiction by American author Nathaniel Hawthorne, published in 1850. Set in Puritan Massachusetts Bay Colony during the years 1642 to 1649, the novel tells the story of Hester Prynne, who conceives a daughter through an affair and then struggles to create a new life of repentance and dignity. Containing a number of religious and historic allusions, the book explores themes of legalism, sin, and guilt.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 674: As Hester looks out over the crowd, she notices a small, misshapen man and recognizes him as her long-lost husband, who has been presumed lost at sea. When the husband sees Hester's shame, he asks a man in the crowd about her and is told the story of his wife's adultery. He angrily exclaims that the child's father, the partner in the adulterous act, should also be punished and vows to find the man. He chooses a new name, Roger Chillingworth, to aid him in his plan.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 676: The Reverend John Wilson and the minister of Hester's church, Arthur Dimmesdale, question her, but she refuses to name her lover. After she returns to her prison cell, the jailer brings in Chillingworth, now a physician, to calm Hester and her child with his roots and herbs. He and Hester have an open conversation regarding their marriage and the fact that they were both in the wrong. Her lover, however, is another matter and he demands to know who it is; Hester refuses to divulge such information. He accepts this, stating that he will find out anyway, and forces her to conceal that he is her husband. If she ever reveals him, he warns her, he will destroy the child's father. Hester agrees to Chillingworth's terms although she suspects she will regret it.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 682: Because Dimmesdale´s health has begun to fail, the townspeople are happy to have Chillingworth, the newly arrived physician, take up lodgings with their beloved minister. Being in such close contact with Dimmesdale, Chillingworth begins to suspect that the minister´s illness is the result of some unconfessed guilt. He applies psychological pressure to the minister because he suspects Dimmesdale is Pearl´s father. One evening, pulling the sleeping Dimmesdale´s vestment aside, Chillingworth sees a symbol that represents his shame on the minister´s pale chest.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 684: Tormented by his guilty conscience, Dimmesdale goes to the square where Hester was punished years earlier. Climbing the scaffold in the dead of night, he admits his guilt but cannot find the courage to do so publicly in the light of day. Hester, shocked by Dimmesdale´s deterioration, decides to obtain a release from her vow of silence to her husband.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 686: Several days later, Hester meets Dimmesdale in the forest and tells him of her husband and his desire for revenge. She convinces Dimmesdale to leave Boston in secret on a ship to Europe where they can start life anew. Inspired by this plan, the minister seems to gain new energy. On Election Day, Dimmesdale gives one of his most inspired sermons. But as the procession leaves the church, Dimmesdale climbs upon the scaffold and confesses his sin, dying in Hester´s arms. Later, most witnesses swear that they saw a stigma in the form of a scarlet "A" upon his chest, although some deny this statement. Chillingworth, losing his will for revenge, dies shortly thereafter and leaves Pearl a substantial inheritance.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 697: Nathaniel Hawthorne (July 4, 1804 – May 19, 1864) was an American novelist, dark romantic, and short story writer. His works often focus on history, morality, and religion.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 698: He was born in 1804 in Salem, Massachusetts, to Nathaniel Hathorne and the former Elizabeth Clarke Manning. His ancestors include John Hathorne, the only judge from the Salem witch trials who never repented his involvement.
    Paskiaisten sukua kuten Pynchonkin.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 708: Elmer Kennedy-Andrews remarks that Hawthorne in "The Custom-house" sets the context for his story and "tells us about ´romance´, which is his preferred generic term to describe The Scarlet Letter, as his subtitle for the book – ´A Romance´ – would indicate." In this introduction, Hawthorne describes a space between materialism and "dreaminess" that he calls "a neutral territory, somewhere between the real world and fairy-land, where the Actual and the Imaginary may meet, and each imbues itself with nature of the other". This combination of "dreaminess" and realism gave the author space to explore major themes.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 778: Only this and nothing more.” joku vikisevä kasa."
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 792: This it is and nothing more.” Se se on, usko vaan.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 804: And the only word there spoken was the whispered word, “Lenore?” "Leonoora?" mä sipitin, kuiskaamalla pihisin,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 805: This I whispered, and an echo murmured back the word, “Lenore!”— - aikamoinen pelote kun kaiku vastas "Lenore" .
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 806: Merely this and nothing more. Uus rivi ja pelkkä kehote.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 811: Let me see, then, what thereat is, and this mystery explore— Kurkistanpa räppänästä, näkyykö jälki käppänästä,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 812: Let my heart be still a moment and this mystery explore;— kestäös vaan sydämmeni, joskus huonomminkin sulla meni!
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 822: Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling, Lintu istui siinä vaiti niinkuin joku kanapaisti.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 829: Much I marvelled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly, Kylläpä mä ihmettelin: Kana löysi partikkelin?
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 832: Ever yet was blessed with seeing bird above his chamber door— eio muiden pystin päähän oven päälle tullut jäämään
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 833: Bird or beast upon the sculptured bust above his chamber door, lintu eikä elikko eikä muukaan olio
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 837: That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour. Istui vaan siin pazaan päällä kuten kurki järven jäällä.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 846: Followed fast and followed faster till his songs one burden bore— sanomasta enää muuta, myötäänsä vaan hoki tuota,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 847: Till the dirges of his Hope that melancholy burden bore kaluaa kuin koiranluuta yhtä sanaa onneton:
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 853: Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore— mietin että mitäpä tämä outo elävä,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 854: What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore tämä outo urvelo, kumma linnun kuikelo
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 857: This I sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing Siinäpä mä sitten istuin, kuumeni pää, naris istuin,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 859: This and more I sat divining, with my head at ease reclining sanaa ulos suusta sill mä, kun killitti mua killisilmä.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 868: Quaff, oh quaff this kind nepenthe and forget this lost Lenore!” helpotusta suolan janoon et palaa mieli Nooran panoon!
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 873: Desolate yet all undaunted, on this desert land enchanted— Piruako tänne luuhaat, eikö ole muuta puuhaa?
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 874: On this home by Horror haunted—tell me truly, I implore— Ei jaxa tota samaa virttä. Toukka seuloo seinähirttä,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 880: Tell this soul with sorrow laden if, within the distant Aidenn, Mee kysymään vaik taivaasta vapaudunko vaivasta,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 894: And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon’s that is dreaming, Kas se onkin vertauskuva, joku professori Mikko Juva,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 895: And the lamp-light o’er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor; arkkipiispa, musta siira. Mun oma musta pää se viiraa,
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 901: Poe describes his method in writing "The Raven" in the essay "The Philosophy of Composition", and he claims to have strictly followed this method. It has been questioned whether he really followed this system, however. T. S. Eliot said: "It is difficult for us to read that essay without reflecting that if Poe plotted out his poem with such calculation, he might have taken a little more pains over it: the result hardly does credit to the method."
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 903: "The Philosophy of Composition" is Edgar Allan Poe's theory about how good writers write when they write well. He concludes that length, "unity of effect" and a logical method are important considerations for good writing. He also makes the assertion that "the death... of a beautiful woman" is "unquestionably the most poetical topic in the world". Poe uses the composition of his own poem "The Raven" as an example. The essay first appeared in the April 1846 issue of Graham's Magazine. It is uncertain if it is an authentic portrayal of Poe's own method.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 907: Poe believed that all literary works should be short. He writes, "[...] there is a distinct limit, as regards length, to all works of literary art — the limit of a single sitting [...]" He especially emphasized this "rule" with regards to poetry, but also noted that the short story is superior to the novel for this reason.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 913: Poe dismissed the notion of artistic intuition and argued that writing is methodical and analytical, not spontaneous. He writes that no other author has yet admitted this because most writers would "positively shudder at letting the public take a peep behind the scenes... at the fully matured fancies discarded in despair... at the cautious selections and rejections"
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 919: The essay states Poe's conviction that a work of fiction should be written only after the author has decided how it is to end and which emotional response, or "effect", he wishes to create, commonly known as the "unity of effect". Once this effect has been determined, the writer should decide all other matters pertaining to the composition of the work, including tone, theme, setting, characters, conflict, and plot. In this case, Poe logically decides on "the death... of a beautiful woman" as it "is unquestionably the most poetical topic in the world, and equally is it beyond doubt that the lips best suited for such topic are those of a bereaved lover." Some commentators have taken this to imply that pure poetry can only be attained by the eradication of female beauty. Biographers and critics have often suggested that Poe's obsession with this theme stems from the repeated loss of women throughout his life, including his mother Eliza Poe, his foster mother Frances Allan and, later, his wife Virginia.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 925: In the essay, Poe traces the logical progression of his creation of "The Raven" as an attempt to compose "a poem that should suit at once the popular and the critical taste." He claims that he considered every aspect of the poem. For example, he purposely set the poem on a tempestuous evening, causing the raven to seek shelter. He purposefully chose a pallid bust to contrast with the dark plume of the bird. The bust was of Pallas in order to evoke the notion of scholar, to match with the presumed student narrator poring over his "volume[s] of forgotten lore." No aspect of the poem was an accident, he claims, but is based on total control by the author.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 927: Even the term "Nevermore," he says, is based on logic following the "unity of effect." The sounds in the vowels in particular, he writes, have more meaning than the definition of the word itself. He had previously used words like "Lenore" for the same effect. The raven itself, Poe says, is meant to symbolize Mournful and Never-ending Remembrance. This may imply an autobiographical significance to the poem, alluding to the many people in Poe's life who had died.
    xxx/ellauri086.html on line 929: George Rex Graham, a friend and former employer of Poe, declined Poe's offer to be the first to print "The Raven". Graham said he did not like the poem but offered $15 as a charity. Graham made up for his poor decision by publishing "The Philosophy of Composition" in the April 1846 issue of Graham's American Monthly Magazine of Literature and Art. Another act of charity.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 126: Sitten Saarinen kertoo esimerkin. Kun pariskunta oli ensimmäisellä yhteisellä ulkomaanmatkallaan Lissabonissa, Pipsa ei ollut suostunut lähtemään ulos hotellista ennen kuin oli siivonnut huoneen siivoojia varten. Sehän onkin lentoemäntä, päntry pitää pitää siistinä seuraavaa miehistöä varten. Rent och fint.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 157: This is Dr. Bombay. Doctoro;
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 162: I take his field of rice
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 332: Milton was born in Brooklyn, New York on July 31, 1912. His parents, Sára Ethel (née Landau) and Jenő Saul Friedman, were Jewish immigrants from Beregszász in Carpathian Ruthenia, Kingdom of Hungary (now Berehove in Ukraine). They both worked as dry goods merchants. Shortly after his birth, the family relocated to Rahway, New Jersey. In his early teens, Friedman was injured in a car accident, which scarred his upper lip.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 334: Milton Friedman (/ˈfriːdmən/; July 31, 1912 – November 16, 2006) was an American economist who received the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his research on consumption analysis, monetary history and theory and the complexity of stabilization policy. With George Stigler and other jews, Friedman was among the intellectual leaders of the Chicago school of economics, a neoclassical school of economic thought associated with the work of the faculty at the University of Chicago that rejected Keynesianism in favor of monetarism until the mid-1970s, when it turned to new classical macroeconomics heavily based on the concept of rational expectations.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 336: He specialized in mathematics and economics, and became influenced by two economics professors, Arthur F. Burns and Homer Jones, who convinced him that printing more money could help end the Great Depression. Friedman met his future wife, economist Rose Director, while at the University of Chicago. Good name. Milton got a doctorate rather late, in 1946, counting the income of typical Jewish professions. His "consumption function", unlike Keynes, took into account that households overspend on the basis of their felt class membership and optimistic income expectations. Good news for supply side economics.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 357: In essence Keynes finds that Moore's apostles adopted his religion meaning one's attitudes towards oneself and the ultimate (Mr. Moore), but ignored his morals, whatever they might be, besides taking in pretty boys from behind like Socrates. What are they pray? Let's give G.E. himself the floor!
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 359: It appears to me that in Ethics, as in all other philosophical studies, the difficulties and disagreements, of which its history is full, are mainly due to a very simple cause: namely to the attempt to answer questions, without first discovering precisely what question it is which you desire to answer.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 380: Among his major contributions to linguistic theory was the hypothesis that not all langages are like English, which Noam Chomsky found difficult to believe. Hale suggested that certain languages were non-configurational, lacking the phrase structure characteristic of such languages as English. Some people were Indians and aboriginals, and some were Finns with a baby and no place to put it in.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 390: This coyness Lady were no crime. Ei kainoutesi leidi oisi rikos. vihaisi kainoutta en.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 408: For Lady you deserve this State; Sä leidi ansaizisit tämän kohtelun; Ansaitset, neito, loiston sen,
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 431: Than languish in his slow-chapt pow'r. Eikä venyä sen hidasleukaisessa kidassa. se murentuen riuduttaa.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 448: To His Coy Mistress" is a metaphysical poem written by the English author and politician Andrew Marvell (1621–1678) either during or just before the English Interregnum (1649–60). It was published posthumously in 1681. This poem is considered one of Marvell's finest and is possibly the best recognised carpe diem poem in English. Although the date of its composition is not known, it may have been written in the early 1650s. At that time, Marvell was serving as a tutor to the daughter of the retired commander of the New Model Army, Sir Thomas Fairfax, fucking her like a rabbit when Papa looked the other way.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 454: Many authors have borrowed the phrase "World enough and time" from the poem's opening line to use in their book title or inside. The most famous is Robert Penn Warren's 1950 novel World Enough and Time: A Romantic Novel, about murder in early-19th-century Kentucky. (WTF,? bet Ernest Heminway's booklet Farewell for Arms (p. 129) is famouser.) With variations, it has also been used for books on the philosophy of physics (World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time), geopolitics (World Enough and Time: Successful Strategies for Resource Management), a science-fiction collection (Worlds Enough & Time: Five Tales of Speculative Fiction), and a biography of the poet (World Enough and Time: The Life of Andrew Marvell). The phrase is used as a title chapter in Andreas Wagner's pop science book on the origin of variation in organisms, "Arrival of the Fittest". The verse serves as an epigraph to Mimesis, literary critic Erich Auerbach's most famous book. It is also the title of an episode of Big Finnish Productions's The Diary of River Song series 2, and of part 1 of Doctor Who's Series 10 finale. It is the title of a Star Trek New Voyages fan episode where George Takei reprises his role as Sulu after being lost in a rift in time. The title of Robert A. Heinlein's 1973 novel Time Enough for Love also echoes this line.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 456: Further in the field of science fiction, Ursula K. Le Guin wrote a Hugo-nominated short story whose title, "Vaster than Empires and More Slow", is taken from the poem. Ian Watson notes the debt of this story to Marvell, "whose complex and allusive poems are of a later form of pastoral to that which I shall refer, and, like Marvell, Le Guin's nature references are, as I want to argue, "pastoral" in a much more fundamental and interesting way than this simplistic use of the term." There are other allusions to the poem in the field of Fantasy and Science Fiction: the first book of James Kahn's "New World Series" is titled "World Enough, and Time"; the third book of Joe Haldeman's "Worlds" trilogy is titled "Worlds Enough and Time"; and Peter S. Beagle's novel A Fine and Private Place about a love affair between two ghosts in a graveyard. The latter phrase has been widely used as a euphemism for the grave, and has formed the title of several mystery novels.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 459: Terry Pratchett opens his poem An Ode to Multiple Universes with "I do have worlds enough and time / to spare an hour to find a rhyme / to take a week to pen an article / a day to find a rhyme for ‘particle’."
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 463: Eliot also alludes to the lines near the end of Marvell's poem, "Let us roll all our strength and all / Our sweetness up into one ball", with his lines, "To have squeezed the universe into a ball / To roll it toward some overwhelming question," as Prufrock questions whether or not such an act of daring would have been worth it. Eliot returns to Marvell in The Waste Land with the lines "But at my back in a cold blast I hear / The rattle of the bones" (Part III, line 185) and "But at my back from time to time I hear / The sound of horns and motors" (Part III, line 196).
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 466: Archibald MacLeish's poem "You, Andrew Marvell", alludes to the passage of time and to the growth and decline of empires. In his poem, the speaker, lying on the ground at sunset, feels "the rising of the night". He visualizes sunset, moving from east to west geographically, overtaking the great civilizations of the past, and feels "how swift how secretly / The shadow of the night comes on."
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 467: B. F. Skinner quotes "But at my back I always hear / Time's wingèd chariot hurrying near", through his character Professor Burris in Walden Two, who is in a confused mood of desperation, lack of orientation, irresolution and indecision. (Prentice Hall 1976, Chapter 31, p. 266). This line is also quoted in Ernest Hemingway's novel A Farewell to Arms, as in Arthur C. Clarke's short story, The Ultimate Melody.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 471: Funny little Jew Primo Levi roughly quotes Marvell in his 1983 poem "The Mouse," which describes the artistic and existential pressures of the awareness that time is finite. He expresses annoyance at the sentiment to seize the day, stating, "And at my back it seems to hear / Some winged curved chariot hurrying near. / What impudence! What conceit! / I really was fed up."
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 475: The line "My vegetable love should grow / Vaster than empires, and more slow" is quoted by William S. Burroughs in the last entry of his diary (July 29, 1997).
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 560: This week, some of the gloss came off the legend of Evel Knievel.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 561: Knievel, who died last November aged 69, liked to boast of his chequered past, claiming to have been a safecracker and bank robber before becoming the world’s best-known motorcycle stuntman. He even spent six months in jail at the height of his career in 1977 for attacking with a baseball bat the author of a book about him to which he took exception.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 562: As an insurance salesman he sold 120 policies to inmates at an insane asylum. He robbed the Czechoslovakian Olympic ice hockey team of money they were to be paid for an exhibition game and allegedly once tried to blast his way into the Butte County courthouse with dynamite.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 563: In 1986 he was arrested for soliciting an undercover policewoman for immoral purposes. In 1995 he was charged with battering his girlfriend Krystal Kennedy after leaving his wife of 35 years. Kennedy declined to testify against Knievel, however, and later married him.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 565: In 1999 he was arrested in California for carrying guns and knives in his car and sentenced to community service. He was also pursued for $21million in unpaid taxes.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 567: He had been in failing health for many years before his death, suffering two strokes, diabetes and the incurable lung disease pulmonary fibrosis. In 1999 he had a liver transplant. As he neared death, Knievel hinted at the dark secrets which remained locked in his heart.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 568: “I am ready to leave my loved ones,” he said. “My wealth, my fame will amount to naught. My grudges, frustrations, resentments and jealousies will finally disappear.” That hope, which Knievel took to his grave, was dashed by the FBI this week.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 616: Cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) is a theoretical framework which helps to understand and analyse the relationship between the human mind (what people think and feel) and activity (what people do). It traces its origins to the founders of the cultural-historical school of Russian psychology L. S. Vygotsky and Aleksei N. Leontiev. Tää oli Esa Sariolan lempilapsi, jonka se kiusasi höynähtäneitä veistoluokissa.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 618: Elsewhere CHAT has been defined as "a cross-disciplinary framework for studying how humans purposefully transform natural and social reality, including themselves, as an ongoing culturally and historically situated, materially and socially mediated process". Core ideas are: 1) humans act collectively, learn by doing, and communicate in and via their actions; 2) humans make, employ, and adapt tools of all kinds to learn and communicate; and 3) community is central to the process of making and interpreting meaning – and thus to all forms of learning, communicating, and acting.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 626: Historicity: activity systems take shape and get transformed over long stretches of time. Potentials and problems can only be understood against the background of their own histories.
    xxx/ellauri087.html on line 756: Tosin trokarigringopahis (joka ei edes osaa espanjaa, vittuako se tekee Sonorassa) kuoli myös, samoinkuin sen koomikkopari joka varmaankin oli mestizi ellei suorastaan zambo. Ne oli tehneet useampiakin virheitä. Hiekkaan tukehtuivat kun I'itoh vimmastui. Pani jauhot suuhun jauhonaamalle ja virnuilijalle. Wiixivallu Sancho Panza käveli vaan myräkkään ja katosi. Kiltit intiaanit pelastuivat, ja vingut samaten. Tää oli hyvä ohjelma, täst mie piän. Kunnossa oli I'itohin teodikeaa. Hyvixille kävi hyvin ja pahixille huonosti.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 153: Stenbäck oli muun muassa NNKY-liiton perustaja ja ensimmäinen puheenjohtaja vuosina 1896–1932 sekä liittohallinnon jäsen 1905–1928 ja toimitti Tilhi-nimistä lastenlehteä vuosina 1884–1886. Hänen teostaan Kasvatusopin historian pääpiirteet I–II (1890–1892) käytettiin yliopiston kurssikirjana. Vuonna 1925 hän julkaisi Wilhem Wegeliuksen elämäkerran.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 193: Kylläpäs on Wilho-Pylkkäsmäistä tyyliä. Mutta asiallisesti tää ei millään lailla eroa mun fuxivuodesta 1971, mäkin menin mukaan kaikenlaisiin poliittisiin hartauskokouxiin, assilaisten opintopiireihin, maolaiselle kiinankurssille jne.jne. Nuorisoikonien kolmiyhteys vaan oli toinen, jumala, jeesus ja pyhis vastaan marx, engels ja lenin. Menin mukaan aspektin kokouxeen ja jouduin heti lehden toimituxexi. Odotuxet oli kovat enkä siinä pettynyt.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 202: »Koko tähänastisen yhteiskunnan historia on ollut luokkataistelujen historiaa – – sortaja ja sorrettu ovat – – käyneet keskeytymätöntä taistelua – – mikä joka kerta on päättynyt joko yhteiskunnan vallankumoukselliseen uudistamiseen tai taistelevien luokkien yhteiseen häviöön.»
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 227: Sun silmihisi kazon luottaen,
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 292: Hauptmann's early dramas reflect the influence of Henrik Ibsen, but the production of Die Weber, a dramatization of the Silesian weavers' revolt of 1844, brought him fame as the leading playwright of his generation. Hauptmann did not only want to give realistic details, but he paid a great deal of attention to historical accuracy, and studied various dialects. His weavers are "flat-chested, coughing creatures of the looms, whose knees are bent with much sitting." The women's clothes are ragged, but some of the young girls are not without charm � they have "delicate figures, large protruding melancholy eyes." Structurally the play, which was at first banned, was innovative � there is no single, individual hero in the cast of more than 70 characters. (Didn't exceed the 80 character limit of first generation mainframe computers.)
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 294: Die versunkene Glocke (1897), a symbolic story of a master bell founder and his struggle as an artist, has been one of Hauptmann's most popular plays. After this Hauptmann wrote the tragedies Fuhrmann Henschel (1899), Michael Kramer (1900), and Rose Bernd (1903). These works also reflected the personal turmoil Hauptmann was then in he had fallen for a fourteen-year-old girl, a promising violinist Margarete Marschalk. She was the opposite of his wife, interested in his work, and in such outdoor sports as hiking, ice-skating, andf skiing. After Hauptmann wife found out about her rival, she moved with the children to Dresden. Hauptmann had a son, Benvenuto, with Margarete, and in 1904, after a long period of agonising thought, Hauptmann divorced Marie and married Margarete. However, a year later he met a sixteen-year-old actress, Ida Orloff, who became a new object of his obsession. Hauptmann described her in his letters as a moth flirting with flames, as a bewitching Siren, as a mermaid, and as a cruel spider.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 296: Gerhart Hauptmann was born in Ober-Salzbrunn (now Szczawno Zdrój, Poland), a fashionable resort in Silesia. His father was Robert Hauptmann, a hotel owner, and mother Marie (Straehler) Hauptmann. After failing at the gymnasium in Breslau, Gerhart was sent to his uncle's estate. There he became aware of Pietism and learned to know the peasants with whom he worked. Already as a child Hauptmann had started to draw, and he entered the art academy in Breslau, intending to become a sculptor. At the age of twenty he moved to Jena, where he studied history at the university.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 298: From 1883 to 1884 Hauptmann studied art in Rome and wrote a romantic poem based on the myth of Prometheus. Ill health forced him to return to Germany. In 1885 he married Marie Thienemann; they had four children. Marie Thienemann was a beautiful, rich heiress, whom he had met in 1881, and who supported him through the four years of their engagement. Hauptmann settled with Marie in Berlin. She admired her husband, but did not much understand literature and was devastated when Gerhart's attention strayed. However, her wealth gave him the freedom to start his career as a writer.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 300: In 1885 Hauptmann set up a home with his wife in the little lakeside village of Erkner. Abandoning his early romantic ideals, he became convinced that life should be depicted as it is. From the intellectual currents of his day he adopted a belief in scientific causality and materialism. His early stories 'Fasching' (1887) and 'Bahnwärter Thiel' (1888) were tales of simple people, although there is also a level which transcends the boundaries of realism.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 302: Throughout the Nazi regime, Hauptmann remained in Germany, which Goebbels used as a propaganda tool, claiming that he had made his peace with the Nazis. The Third Reich refused to allow him to receive the Schiller Prize, for which he was almost continuously recommended. A complete seventeen- volume edition of his works came out in 1942. Hauptmann died on June 6 1946 of pneumonia, at his home in Agnetendorf. His last work, the unfinished Der neue Christophorus, was again a story of suffering humanity.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 332: The origin of the political left and right in politics do actually have to with the physical directions, left and right. Time for a history lesson.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 334: Relative to the viewpoint of the speaker (chair) of this assembly, to the right were seated nobility and more high-ranking religious leaders. To the left were seated commoners and less powerful clergy. The right-hand side (called le côté droit in French) became associated with more reactionary views (more pro-aristocracy) and the left-hand side (le côté gauche) with more radical views (more pro-middle class). Conservatives wanted to conserve their right of way, and the radicals wanted to eradiate their privilege (and install their own instead). Left and right, as political adjectives, are recorded in English in the 1790s.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 338: The New Yorker Magazine was founded in 1925, by Harold Ross and his wife, Jane Grant and they were backed by Raoul Fleischmann.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 342: In review, The New Yorker uses strong emotionally loaded headlines such as “Don’t Underestimate Elizabeth Warren and Her Populist Message” and “Is Fraud Part of the Trump Organization’s Business Model?” The New Yorker also publishes satirical articles from satirist Andy Borowitz through his Borowitz Report, such as “Trump Offers to Station Pence at Border with Binoculars in Lieu of Wall.” The Borowitz Report always favors the left and mocks the right. Further, The New Yorker provides original in-depth journalistic reporting such as this: Four Women Accuse New York’s Attorney General of Physical Abuse. The result of this investigation led to the Attorney General resigning just hours after the New Yorker published the story. In general, both wording and story selection tends to mostly favor the left.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 348: A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 77% of the New Yorker’s audience is consistently or mostly liberal, 16% Mixed and 6% consistently or mostly conservative. This indicates that the New Yorker is strongly preferred by a more liberal audience.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 349: Please take into account this chart is from an American Perspective and may not align with all countries. And now for some ---
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 422: Left: Against voter ID laws citing an undue burden on lower-income groups causing them to be disenfranchised, and that there is virtually no evidence of voter fraud actually occurring.

    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 451: BDSM är en grupp erotiska tekniker. I äldre svensk terminologi betecknas det som sadomasochism. I huvudsakligen kretsar det kring användandet av makt och smärta i sexuellt syfte. Kring BDSM har utformats en särskild subkultur. Det äldre ordet sadomasochism har i flera andra språk behållit sin grundbetydelse, men i modern svensk terminologi brukar ordet oftast betecknas som en del av BDSM, nämligen att använda smärta i sexuellt syfte.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 483: adventure.

    Europe — the land of high culture, high fashion, delicious food and centuries-spanning history. What’s not to love? 


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 484:

    Well, we asked ourselves this question, and considering how many countries are in Europe, we decided there are plenty of things not to
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 514:

    We actually wonder why anyone would want to visit this place, let alone live there. The food is drab, and the weather is worse. They serve beer at room temp. The museums are free, but they stole the art from cultures with far superior artists. Oh, and a certain current political situation has the country in a state of complete and utter disarray. 


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 525:

    If you thought San Marino was a small Southern California city with luxe real estate where it’s always sunny, you were spot on. But there’s another San Marino, too: this European country landlocked by Italy that’s half the size of San Francisco.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 538:

    The coolest part about this small Balkan country is how weirdly tall everyone is — the average height is more than 6 feet. Not half as fat as us though so there!


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 556:

    Slovenia is one of Europe’s greenest countries and that’s about it. There’s nothing particularly noteworthy about this warm Yugoslav republic except that it’s near cooler countries.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 557:

    If you’re the type who vacations for the sleep, this is your destination. There’s so little to do here that you can sleep for days without feeling guilty or missing anything. 


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 570:

    Otherwise, this place is about as depressing as you’d imagine for a former Soviet republic — and one where the greatest nuclear disaster in history took place. Not as many burnt corpses as in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so we are still leading there.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 595:

    Just kidding, this country is actually there.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 599:

    This country is like the cool goth kid of Europe. It’s proudly defiant, with a completely different language and alphabet than all those other Slavic nations. (What the fuck?) They had a proudly defiant ruler (Ceausescu) but he is dead.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 603:

    Many will scoff at this ranking, saying Serbia is some vast tundra of middle Russia, right? For its abysmal nationalist politics and icy relations with neighbors, we rank Serbia even higher than Sibiria. It feels like home.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 607:

    Kudos to Lithuania for telling the Soviets to shove it back in 1990 and starting the breakup of that union. It’s also believed that Lithuanian culture survived the Iron Curtain thanks to secret home schools and alternative history texts, which makes its people sound really awesome. Isn't this just what we do? We are super-jealous of its surprisingly good basketball team.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 611:

    Admit it: George Costanza’s failed attempt to convert to Latvian Orthodox is your only experience with this former Soviet republic. 


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 619:

    Make like every 20-something backpacker and head to Prague, then chill out and grab a pint along with that 15-link sausage sampler in this thoroughly satisfying European nation. Not at all as crowded as Vatican.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 624:

    Let’s all just take some breaths and think about this. France has everything and always will, which is terribly frustrating. And they know this and so they deserve to be put in their place whenever possible. When asked to choose the most arrogant people in Europe, French people chose themselves. We are very offended.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 625:

    Sure, the food is perfection, the art scene is out of control and there’s enough history to fill several volumes of textbooks. But can’t the French be more humble about it!? And why didn't they join the mobbing of Iraq? We'll never forgive that.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 630:

    And congrats on finally besting France at anything (i.e., this important list).


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 694:

    When it comes to the essentials in life, no one does it better than the Danes. They might not have the museums of France, the cuisine of Italy, the beaches of Spain and Portugal, or the wine of Croatia, but the overall quality of life in this Scandinavian country is tops in the world


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 696:

    Danes even have a word called “janteloven” that basically means, we’re all equal and important and deserve each other’s respect. This makes it an awesome place to live in, an awesome place for all to visit, and the best country in Europe.


    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 774: Balch converted from Unitarianism and became a Quaker in 1921. She stated, "Religion seems to me one of the most interesting things in life, one of the most puzzling, richest and thrilling fields of human thought and speculation... religious experience and thought need also a light a day and sunshine and a companionable sharing with others of which it seems to me there is generally too little... The Quaker worship at its best seems to me give opportunities for this sort of sharing without profanation."
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 776: The Nobel Peace Prize 1946 was divided equally between Emily Greene Balch "for her lifelong work for the cause of peace" and John Raleigh Mott "for his contribution to the creation of a peace-promoting religious brotherhood across national boundaries."
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 780: All this was in the early 1890’s at a time when Europe was becoming increasingly conscious of the untold social problems bequeathed by the Industrial Revolution. But the dawn of enlightenment had not yet broken over America.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 782: Practical work alone, however, did not exhaust the aspirations that gripped Emily Balch. She felt the need both to acquire knowledge and to pass it on to others if she was to achieve more. And so she continued her studies, first in Paris under Levasseur1, the historian of the French working class, and later in Berlin where she studied that branch of economics which has been called a «professor-chair socialism»2. Here she also came in contact with the European labor movement and attended the Socialist Trade Union Congress in 1896.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 784: A typical example is her work concerning immigrants. She was the first professor in America to give students a course of lectures on problems relating to immigrants. Best known, undoubtedly, is her work on the Slav immigrants in the United States, a work which is said to be a landmark in the scientific analysis of immigration problems3. This work provides a perfect illustration of her approach: before putting pen to paper she visited most of the Slav centers in the United States and also did research for a year in those regions of Austria-Hungary from which many of the immigrants came. Not content to rely on verbal or written sources, she felt she had to see things for herself, to meet these people, and to study their conditions at first hand.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 788: To use her own words: «My reaction was above all a feeling that this was a tragic break in the work which to me appeared to be the real task of our time: to construct a more satisfying economic order.» But the impact upon her must have been more powerful than she herself cared to admit, for from the outbreak of the war she devoted all her strength to the work for peace. Or, as Professor Simkhovitch of Columbia4 says: «I have never met anyone who has, as she has done, for decade after decade given every minute of her life to the work for peace between nations.»
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 790: Emily Balch probably did not realize – and few did at that time – that 1914 was, more than 1939, the great turning point of our era. It marked the end of an epoch, and subsequent events have, in many ways, robbed people of their faith in the individual and in justice, which have been the heritage and the source of strength for the best in this world. Men have grown harder since then, more skeptical, and the doctrine that might is right has found its way increasingly into both internal and external policies, even after the end of this last war.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 792: Following the conference at The Hague, two delegations, one of them headed by Emily Balch, visited neutral and belligerent countries alike to submit their resolutions to the statesmen. A polite reception was accorded to them everywhere. This is not surprising, for the statesman is as a rule polite, perhaps especially so when dealing with women, but his true thoughts inevitably remain concealed behind his inscrutable smile. The women failed to make any headway with their proposals; and this was only to be expected with things as they were.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 794: With the coming of peace, the Women’s League arranged its second conference at Zurich in 1919 while the Allies were discussing the peace treaty in Paris. The conference thus had the opportunity of studying a draft of the peace treaty. Time does not permit me to review the resolutions which were passed as a result of this study. What I can and will say is that it would have been judicious to have heeded the women’s counsel.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 800: *Mr. Jahn delivered this speech in the auditorium of the Nobel Institute in the early afternoon of December 10, 1946. At its conclusion, Mr. Jahn read a message of acceptance from Miss Balch, whose health prevented her from attending the ceremonies, and presented the prize to Mr. Huston of the U.S. Embassy who accepted in her name. This translation is based on the Norwegian text in Les Prix Nobel en 1946, which contains, also, a French translation.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 809: John Raleigh Mott (May 25, 1865 - January 31, 1955) was born in Livingston Manor, New York, Sullivan County, New York and his family moved to Postville, Iowa in September of the same year. He attended Upper Iowa University, where he studied history and was an award-winning student debater. He transferred to Cornell University, where he received his bachelor's degree in 1888. He was influenced by Arthur Tappan Pierson one of the forces behind the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions, which was founded in 1886. Mott married Leila Ada White (1866-1952) in 1891 and had two sons and two daughters.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 815: John Raleigh Mott (May 25, 1865 – January 31, 1955) was an evangelist and long-serving leader of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) and the World Student Christian Federation (WSCF). He received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1946 for his work in establishing and strengthening international Protestant Christian student organizations that worked to promote peace. He shared the prize with Emily Balch.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 819: John Raleigh Mott is an American like Emily Greene Balch, with whom he shares this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. He was born in Sullivan County in the state of New York on May 25, 1865. It was assumed that he would follow in the footsteps of his father, a timber merchant engaged in transporting timber on the tributaries of the Delaware River. But he was an avid reader, and the town’s Methodist minister persuaded his parents to allow him to continue his studies. For a long time the boy did not know what he wanted to be. His father hoped that he would return to the timber trade, while he himself vacillated between the church, law, and politics. But during his years of study he was stirred by the Gospel of Christ to mankind, and when the Y.M.C.A. asked him to become a traveling secretary among the students of American and Canadian universities he interpreted the offer as a call from the Lord. He answered the call. It did not take him back to the Delaware River. It sent him out into the wide world and it has brought him here today.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 825: And the old John Mott is still to be found in the midst of the young, a tireless servant of his Master. His long life has brought him profound disappointments. But they have never broken his spirit nor cooled his ardor.He believes that good will triumph in the end, that all the trials and struggles, all the disappointments and defeats, must bring the fulfillment of the Christian promise that all men shall become one. Like the story of Adam run backwards, the last woman stuck back to where she was taken from.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 827: The World’s Student Christian Federation was founded in 1895 under his leadership at a meeting held in Vadstena Castle1. Following this happy event, Mott departed on his first missionary journey. He wanted to organize student associations all over the world. On this journey he visited twenty-four countries, founded seventy new associations, created national associations of Christian students in India, Ceylon, New Zealand, Australia, China, and Japan, and selected corresponding members of the world federation in Egypt, Hawaii, and in many European countries.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 831: Someone has calculated that he has covered more than two million miles on his travels; that is equal to seventy times the circumference of the earth! Almost as far as Kip and Peewee, and that without Oscar on his back!
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 837: His simple preaching was a source of strength and inspiration to those whom he addressed or with whom he talked; his powerful tinselfish and his noble character won him friends and followers and opened the way for brotherhood between nations under the banner of Christ – always the central theme of his preaching.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 841: He organized a series of world conferences of Christian students, the best known being the Tokyo Conference of 1907, which marked the movement’s breakthrough in the Far East. Wilho was poised for his voyage to China just then.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 843: The work of the organization, its program, and the resolutions which it sent out into the world bore the imprint of his forceful personality.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 845: We Christian students, states one such resolution, believe in the fundamental equality of all races and nations, and we consider it a part of our Christian duty to give expression to this principle in our relations with people. We also believe it to be our absolute duty to use all our efforts to combat everything which can lead to war and to combat war itself as a means of resolving international disputes.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 847: In his own country, the United States, he has performed great work on behalf of the Negroes. To fight prejudices which exist in one’s own society makes a bigger demand perhaps on a man’s personality and strength of character than any other endeavor.
    xxx/ellauri091.html on line 849: The three great world organizations which have flourished under his leadership for a generation – the Student Federation, the Young Men’s Christian Association, and the International Missionary Council – have in his hands been instruments for creating that spirit of Christian tolerance and love which can give peace to the world.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 145:

    Who the heck his Lionel Drivel?


    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 158: We Need to Talk About Kevin was awarded the 2005 Agent Orange Prize. The novel is a study of maternal ambivalence, and the role it might have played in the title character's decision to murder only nine people at his high school. Gharbi got a significantly higher body count, but then his mother was more supportive. It provoked much controversy and achieved success through word of mouth. She said this about We Need To Talk About Kevin becoming a success:
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 176: This is the full transcript of the keynote speech, Fiction and Identity Politics, Lionel Drrivel gave at the Brisbane Writers Festival on 8 September 2016. Her latest book The Mandibles, is published by Harper Collins.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 178: I hate to disappoint you folks, but unless we stretch the topic to breaking point this address will not be about “community and belonging.” In fact, you have to hand it to this festival’s organisers: inviting a renowned racist to speak about “community and belonging” is like expecting a tadpole to balance a beach ball on its nose.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 184: Let’s start with a tempest-in-a-teacup at Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine. Earlier this year, two students, both members of student government, threw a tequila-themed birthday party for a friend. The hosts provided attendees with miniature sombreros, which—the horror— numerous partygoers wore.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 190: Now, I am a little at a loss to explain what’s so insulting about a sombrero – a practical piece of headgear for a hot climate that keeps out the sun with a wide brim. And what's so insulting about shackles - a practical way to keep a cotton worker focused on his work. My parents went to Mexico when I was small, and brought a sombrero back from their travels, the better for my brothers and I to unashamedly appropriate the souvenir to play dress-up. For my part, as a German-American on both sides, I’m more than happy for anyone who doesn’t share my genetic pedigree to don a Tyrolean hat, pull on some leiderhosen, pour themselves a weisbier, and belt out the Hoffbrauhaus Song. (Leiderhosen? weisbier? Damn what ignoramus. But she is American, remember. Donald Trump is an expatriate German too. Hitler was an expatriate Austrian. Bet he had a Tirolean hat, a green one like aunt Inkeri.)
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 193: But what does this have to do with writing fiction? The moral of the sombrero scandals is clear: you’re not supposed to try on other people’s hats. Yet that’s what we’re paid to do, isn’t it? Step into other people’s shoes, and try on their hats. Try their underwear for size. Make fun of them when they don't say Calvin Klein, or have skidmarks on them.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 198: In his masterwork English Passengers, Matthew Kneale would have restrained himself from including chapters written in an Aboriginal’s voice – though these are some of the richest, most compelling passages in that novel. If Dalton Trumbo had been scared off of describing being trapped in a body with no arms, legs, or face because he was not personally disabled – because he had not been through a World War I maiming himself and therefore had no right to “appropriate” the isolation of a paraplegic – we wouldn’t have the haunting 1938 classic, Johnny Got His Gun, unless he had written it with a pen in his arse. (Never heard of any of these masterpieces, but then I hadn't heard of Drivel or Kevin either until today.)
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 200: We wouldn’t have Maria McCann’s erotic masterpiece, As Meat Loves Salt – in which a straight woman writes about gay men in the English Civil War. Though the book is nonfiction, it’s worth noting that we also wouldn’t have 1961’s Black Like Me, for which John Howard Griffin committed the now unpardonable sin of “blackface.” Having his skin darkened – Michael Jackson in reverse – Griffin found out what it was like to live as a black man in the segregated American South. He’d be excoriated today, yet that book made a powerful social impact at the time.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 202: The author of Who Owns Culture? Appropriation and Authenticity in American Law, Susan Scafidi, a law professor at Fordham University who for the record is white, defines cultural appropriation as “taking intellectual property, traditional knowledge, cultural expressions, or artifacts from someone else’s culture without permission. This can include unauthorised use of another culture’s dance, dress, music, language, folklore, cuisine, traditional medicine, religious symbols, etc.”
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 206: But this latest and little absurd no-no is part of a larger climate of super-sensitivity, giving rise to proliferating prohibitions supposedly in the interest of social justice that constrain fiction writers and prospectively makes our work impossible.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 211: The felony of cultural sticky fingers even extends to exercise: at the University of Ottawa in Canada, a yoga teacher was shamed into suspending her class, “because yoga originally comes from India.” She offered to re-title the course, “Mindful Stretching.” And get this: the purism has also reached the world of food. Supported by no less than Lena Dunham, students at Oberlin College in Ohio have protested “culturally appropriated food” like sushi in their dining hall (lucky cusses— in my day, we never had sushi in our dining hall), whose inauthenticity is “insensitive” to the Japanese.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 214: This same sensibility is coming to a bookstore near you. Because who is the appropriator par excellence, really? Who assumes other people’s voices, accents, patois, and distinctive idioms? Who literally puts words into the mouths of people different from themselves? Who dares to get inside the very heads of strangers, who has the chutzpah to project thoughts and feelings into the minds of others, who steals their very souls? Who is a professional kidnapper? Who swipes every sight, smell, sensation, or overheard conversation like a kid in a candy store, and sometimes take notes the better to purloin whole worlds? Who is the premier pickpocket of the arts? The fiction writer, that’s who. Yes, she is a real piece of shit more often than not. I know, I've been there.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 216: Mine is a disrespectful vocation by its nature – prying, voyeuristic, kleptomaniacal, and presumptuous. And I love it! Those adjectives fit me to a T! When Truman Capote wrote from the perspective of condemned murderers from a lower economic class than his own, he had some gall. After that, he had some cash. And his economic class went way up. What did the murderers get for it? Undying fame.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 220: In his 2009 novel Little Bee, Chris Cleave, who as it happens is participating in this festival, dared to write from the point of view of a 14-year-old Nigerian girl, though he is male, white, and British. I’ll remain neutral on whether he “got away with it” in literary terms, because I haven’t read the book yet. But most likely it is drivel. I love it!
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 221: But in principle, I admire his courage – if only because he invited this kind of ethical forensics in a review out of San Francisco: “When a white male author writes as a young Nigerian girl, is it an act of empathy, or identity theft?” the reviewer asked. “When an author pretends to be someone he is not, he does it to tell a story outside of his own experiential range. But he has to in turn be careful that he is representing his characters, not using them for his plot.” Depends on who gets the money, I'd say. Chris Cleave hardly gave it all away to poor Nigerian gals.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 223: Hold it. OK, he’s necessarily “representing” his characters, by portraying them on the page. But of course he’s using them for his plot! How could he not? They are his characters, to be manipulated at his whim, to fulfill whatever purpose he cares to put them to.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 224: This same reviewer recapitulated Cleave’s obligation “to show that he’s representing [the girl], rather than exploiting her.” Again, a false dichotomy. Unlike Kingsley Amis and his dad, we well-to-do white Americans can do both. America is a representative democracy, after all. We represent, y'all just stick to picking the cotton.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 226: Of course he’s exploiting her. It’s his book, and he made her up. He owns her, she is her property. He is free to fuck her, rape her, do whatever he wants. The character is his creature, to be exploited up a storm. Yet the reviewer chides that “special care should be taken with a story that’s not implicitly yours to tell” and worries that “Cleave pushes his own boundaries maybe further than they were meant to go.”
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 235: My most recent novel The Mandibles was taken to task by one reviewer for addressing an America that is “straight and white”. It happens that this is a multigenerational family saga – about a white family. I wasn’t instinctively inclined to insert a transvestite or bisexual, with issues that might distract from my central subject matter of apocalyptic economics. Yet the implication of this criticism is that we novelists need to plug in representatives of a variety of groups in our cast of characters, as if filling out the entering class of freshmen at a university with strict diversity requirements. Besides, America IS straight and white, at least the America I know about. I haven't had time to appropriate any Nigerian girls yet, nor Afro Americans even.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 237: You do indeed see just this brand of tokenism in television. There was a point in the latter 1990s at which suddenly every sitcom and drama in sight had to have a gay or lesbian character or couple. That was good news as a voucher of the success of the gay rights movement, but it still grew a bit tiresome: look at us, our show is so hip, one of the characters is homosexual! It is SOOO tiresome, why can't we just watch the superbly funny middle class straight white Americans instead?
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 240: Fine. But I still would like to reserve the right as a novelist to use only the characters that pertain to my story. Which is NOT going to be about some funny lesbians and fat blacks, as long as I have a say on this. And I do, I do! For I am a straight white middle-class American, and thank God they still have the say!
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 245: In The Mandibles, I have one secondary character, Luella, who’s black. She’s married to a more central character, Douglas, the Mandible family’s 97-year-old patriarch. I reasoned that Douglas, a liberal New Yorker, would credibly have left his wife for a beautiful, stately African American because arm candy of color would reflect well on him in his circle, and keep his progressive kids’ objections to a minimum. But in the end the joke is on Douglas, because Luella suffers from early onset dementia, while his ex-wife, staunchly of sound mind, ends up running a charity for dementia research. As the novel reaches its climax and the family is reduced to the street, they’re obliged to put the addled, disoriented Luella on a leash, to keep her from wandering off. LOL! What a laugh, ain't it? Get it, the guy thought he was getting arm candy, but instead he got a goat!
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 247: I confess that this climate of scrutiny has got under my skin.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 248: Behold, the reviewer in the Washington Post, who groundlessly accused this book of being “racist” because it doesn’t toe a strict Democratic Party line in its political outlook, described the scene thus: “The Mandibles are white. Luella, the single African American in the family, arrives in Brooklyn incontinent and demented. She needs to be physically restrained. As their fortunes become ever more dire and the family assembles for a perilous trek through the streets of lawless New York, she’s held at the end of a leash. If The Mandibles is ever made into a film, my suggestion is that this image not be employed for the movie poster.” Your author, by implication, yearns to bring back slavery. Failing that, she does the best to poke fictive fun at a fictive member of the underprivileged race. Nobody laugh?
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 252: In fact, I’m reminded of a letter I received in relation to my seventh novel from an Armenian-American who objected – why did I have to make the narrator of We Need to Talk About Kevin Armenian? He didn’t like my narrator, and felt that her ethnicity disparaged his community. I took pains to explain that I knew something about Armenian heritage, because my best friend in the States was Armenian, and I also thought there was something dark and aggrieved in the culture of the Armenian diaspora that was atmospherically germane to that book. Besides, I despaired, everyone in the US has an ethnic background of some sort, and she had to be something! Joe Biden has finally admitted that the Armenian genocide was a genocide and not just an unusually bad case of flu. I am not convinced of it yet.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 255: I confess that this climate of scrutiny has got under my lucidly white skin. When I was first starting out as a novelist, I didn’t hesitate to write black characters, for example, or to avail myself of black dialects, for which, having grown up in the American South, I had a pretty good ear. I am now much more anxious about depicting characters of different races, and accents make me nervous. I try my best to talk average middle class American, but occasionally a few bits of North Carolina slip out. Sorry about that. Here's how I'd sound if I din't steal from anyone but the likes of me:
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 257:

    I’m from a small rural community, and ev’rybody who lived in my neighborhood, if you want to call it that, were relatives.  We called it “the circle,” and our house was there, my grandmother’s house was there, an aun’ an’ uncle who were childless lived there, and (uh) a couple of aunts an’ uncles who had children.  There were five female cousins, an’ in the summertime we hung out together all day long from early until late.  In my grandmother’s yard was a maple tree, and the five of us developed that into our apartment building.  Each of us had a limb, and [small laugh] the less daring cousins took the lo’er limbs, and I and another cousin a year younger than I always went as far to the top as we could, an’ we– we were kinda derisive of those girls who stayed with the lower limbs.  We had front doors an’ back doors.  The front door was the — the limb — were the limbs on the front, that were nearest (um) the boxwood hedge.  And the grass was all worn away in that area.  An’ then the back doorwa–was on the back side of the tree, an’ you could only enter the front an’ exit from the rear.  And that had to be done by swinging off a limb that was fairly high off the ground, and (um) my cousin Belinda and I had no problem with that, but the other girls — that was always somethin’ we had to coax them into doin’.  But still, you entered the front, you left the rear.  We (um) ate our lunches together.  When it was lunchtime — an’ our mothers always cooked lunch in the summertime ’cause they didn’ want to be in the hot kitchen at night.  So we would just take our (um) — go home, an’ we’d load our plates with all the vegetables an’ the cornbread, an’ get our glasses of milk or ice tea or whatever we were havin’, an’ we would head for somebody’s yard, where we would all sit down an’ eat together.  It was just an institution:  lunch in somebody’s yard.  An’ if you wanted to go home for a second helping– sometimes that was quite a little walk, but it was worth it, because that was our thing, having lunch together, every day.  (Um) We gathered at my grandmother’s on Sundays.  All my aunts would get those chairs, form a circle.  (Uh) One crocheted.  (Uh) Most of them just sat an’ talked, an’ we girls hung out for the main part with the women.  (Uh) The men would gather around the fish pond, which was in a side yard.  It was (um) — it was kind of a rock (um) pond that my granddaddy had, had built.  There was a ir’n pipe in the middle, an’ when he went fishin’, he would put his catch in there.  Or he caught a mud turtle, he’d put it in there.  An’ there it stayed until it was time to kill it an’ cook it, whatever it was.  The pipe in the middle had water that sprayed up all the time.  There was a locust tree near there, an’ that’s where we girls picked the leaves an’ the thorns to make the doll clothes out o’ the locust.  It’s where we always ate the watermelon.  We always had to save the rind, an’ we always had to leave some pink on that rind, because my grandmother made watermelon pickles out o’ that rind.  I hated the things.  I thought they were the worst things I ever put in my mouth.  But ever’body else thought watermelon pickles were just a great delicacy.  That was also around the time that ev’rybody grew gladiolias [sic] an’ I thought they were the ugliest flower I’d ever laid my eyes on, but ever’body had gladiolias.  ‘Course now I’ve come to appreciate the gladiolia, but back then I had absolutely no appreciation for it.  It was also where we made (uh) ice cream, (uh) on the front porch.  We made ice cream on Sunday afternoons.  I had an aunt who worked in the general mercantile business that my family owned, an’ she was only home on Sunday, so she baked all day:  homemade rolls an’ cakes.  And so, she made cakes an’ we made ice cream, an’ ever’body wan’ed to crank, of course.  (Um) That was just a big treat, to get to crank that ice cream.  It was jus’ our Sunday afternoon thing, an’ I, I think back on it.  All the aunts would sit around an’ they’d talk, an’ they’d smoke.  Even if you never saw those ladies smoke, any other time o’ the week.  On Sunday afternoon when we all were gathered about in gran- in granny’s yard, they’d have a cigarette.  Just a way of relaxing, I suppose.  The maple tree’s now gone.  In later years, it was thought the maple tree, our apartment building, was shading the house too much an’ causing mildew, so it was removed at some point.  And I don’t, to this day, enjoy lookin’ (uh) into that part o’ the yard. …


    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 260: In describing a second-generation Mexican American who’s married to one of my main characters in The Mandibles, I took care to write his dialogue in standard American English, to specify that he spoke without an accent, and to explain that he only dropped Spanish expressions tongue-in-cheek. I would certainly think twice – more than twice – about ever writing a whole novel, or even a goodly chunk of one, from the perspective of a character whose race is different from my own – because I may sell myself as an iconoclast, but I’m as anxious as the next person about attracting big money. But I think that’s a loss. I think that indicates a contraction of my fictional universe that is not good for the books, and not good for my purse.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 262: Writing under the pseudonym Edward Schlosser on Vox, the author of the essay “I’m a Liberal Professor, and My Liberal Students Scare Me” describes higher education’s “current climate of fear” and its “heavily policed discourse of semantic sensitivity” – and I am concerned that this touchy ethos, in which offendedness is used as a weapon, has spread far beyond academia, in part thanks to social media.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 264: Now I proceed to the topic "The left’s embrace of gotcha hypersensitivity inevitably invites backlash." Why, it’s largely in order to keep from losing my fictional mojo that I stay off Facebook and Twitter, which could surely install an instinctive self-censorship out of fear of attack. Ten years ago, I gave the opening address of this same festival, in which I maintained that fiction writers have a vested interest in protecting everyone’s right to offend others – because if hurting someone else’s feelings even inadvertently is sufficient justification for muzzling, there will always be someone out there who is miffed by what you say, and freedom of speech is dead. Why, freedom of speech is just about miffing! What's the use of the freedom if you are not allowed to miff! With the rise of identity politics, which privileges a subjective sense of injury as actionable basis for prosecution, that is a battle that in the decade since I last spoke in Brisbane we’ve been losing.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 266: Worse: the left’s embrace of gotcha hypersensitivity inevitably invites backlash. Donald Trump appeals to people like me who have had it up to their eyeballs with being told what they can and cannot say. Pushing back against a mainstream culture of speak-no-evil suppression, they lash out in defiance, and then what they say is pretty appalling. I actually think President Trump is a real cool guy. Especially I love his hair, it most definitely is not black and curly like that other president's.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 268: Regarding identity politics, what’s especially saddened me in my recent career is a trend toward rejecting the advocacy of anyone who does not belong to the group. In 2013, I published Big Brother, a novel that grew out of my loss of my own older brother, who in 2009 died from the complications of morbid obesity. I was moved to write the book not only from grief, but also sympathy of morbid obesity: in the years before his death, as my brother grew heavier, I saw how dreadfully other people treated him – how he would be seated off in a corner of a restaurant, how the staff would roll their eyes at each other after he’d ordered, though he hadn’t requested more food than anyone else. Just a little wafer, is all.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 270: I was wildly impatient with the way we assess people’s characters these days in accordance with their weight, and tried to get on the page my dismay at how much energy people waste on this matter, sometimes anguishing for years over a few excess pounds. Both author and book were on the side of the angels, or so you would think.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 272: But in my events to promote Big Brother, like trying to peddle it to my acquaintances, I started to notice a pattern. Most of the people buying the book in the signing queue were thin. Well the whole queue was pretty thin. Especially in the US, fat is now one of those issues where you either have to be one of us, or you’re the enemy. It's like Christianity: who is not for Jesus is against him. We don't know if he was fat, but most likely he was scrawny, he could not even carry his cross. I verified this when I had a long email correspondence with a “Healthy at Any Size” activist, who was incensed by the novel, which she hadn’t even read. Which she refused to read. No amount of explaining that the novel was on her side, that it was a book that was terribly pained by the way heavy people are treated and how unfairly they are judged, could overcome the scrawny author’s photo on the flap.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 274: She and her colleagues in the fat rights movement did not want my advocacy. I could not weigh in on this material because I did not belong to the club. I found this an artistic, political, and even commercial disappointment – because in the US and the UK, if only skinny-minnies will buy your book, you’ve evaporated the pool of prospective obese consumers to a puddle.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 283: I made this same point in relation to gender in Melbourne last week: both as writers and as people, we should be seeking to push beyond the constraining categories into which we have been arbitrarily dropped by birth. If we embrace narrow group-based identities too fiercely, we cling to the very cages in which others would seek to trap us. We pigeonhole ourselves. We limit our own notion of who we are, and in presenting ourselves as one of a membership, a representative of our type, an ambassador of an amalgam, we ask not to be seen. I have done my best to stretch my female identity, and after years of strenuous stretching it is in fact almost as long already as that of my drummer boy's.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 287: Now I get to the topic: Why the fuss over a white woman having a black hairstyle? Sit tight and read more! I know this is TDLR, but this is so important!
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 290: The last thing we fiction writers need is restrictions on what belongs to us. In a recent interview, our colleague Chris Cleave conceded, “Do I as an Englishman have any right to write a story of a Nigerian woman? … I completely sympathise with the people who say I have no right to do this. My only excuse is that I do it well.”
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 310: “Mama, I can’t sit here,” I said, the corners of my mouth dragging downwards. “I cannot legitimise this …”
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 317: “How is this happening?”
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 334: See, here is the thing: if the world were equal, this discussion would be different. But alas, that utopia is far from realised.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 335: It’s not always OK if a white guy writes the story of a Nigerian woman because the actual Nigerian woman can’t get published or reviewed to begin with. It’s not always OK if a straight white woman writes the story of a queer Indigenous man, because when was the last time you heard a queer Indigenous man tell his own story? How is it that said straight white woman will profit from an experience that is not hers, and those with the actual experience never be provided the opportunity? It’s not always OK for a person with the privilege of education and wealth to write the story of a young Indigenous man, filtering the experience of the latter through their own skewed and biased lens, telling a story that likely reinforces an existing narrative which only serves to entrench a disadvantage they need never experience.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 339: But there is a bigger and broader issue, one that, for me, is more emotive. Cultural appropriation is a “thing”, because of our histories. The history of colonisation, where everything was taken from a people, the world over. Land, wealth, dignity … and now identity is to be taken as well?
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 341: In making light of the need to hold onto any vestige of identity, Shriver completely disregards not only history, but current reality. The reality is that those from marginalised groups, even today, do not get the luxury of defining their own place in a norm that is profoundly white, straight and, often, patriarchal. And in demanding that the right to identity should be given up, Shriver epitomised the kind of attitude that led to the normalisation of imperialist, colonial rule: “I want this, and therefore I shall take it.”
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 351: The fact Shriver was given such a prominent platform from which to spew such vitriol shows that we as a society still value this type of rhetoric enough to deem it worthy of a keynote address. The opening of a city’s writers festival could have been graced by any of the brilliant writers and thinkers who challenge us to be more. To be uncomfortable. To progress.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 396: Edinburghissa Rowling työsti kirjoituksiaan istuen usein kahviloissa, erityisesti sukulaistensa omistamassa kahvila Nicholson’sissa. Vuonna 1994 hän löysi hiukan sihteerintyötäkin. Paljon Rowling ei voinut kuitenkaan ansaita, ettei olisi menettänyt tukia, minkä vuoksi Rowlingin ja hänen lapsensa elämä ei ollut kovin ruusuista. (Senkö tautta Rowling on rautarouvan linjoilla? Elämä olisi ollut ruusuisempaa ilman tukia.) Rowling pääsi opiskelemaan opettajakoulutukseen, sai pienen stipendin ja pystyi elättämään itsensä ja lapsensa ilman tukia. Tukihan se on stipendikin vittu. Hän sai myös avioeron miehestään 26. kesäkuuta 1995.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 398: Rowlingin käsikirjoitus edistyi Edinburghissa, ja hän lähetti sen kolme ensimmäistä lukua Christopher Littlen agentuuriin, joka edusti useita kirjailijoita, myös joitakin kuuluisiakin. Aluksi käsikirjoitus oli mennä hylättyjen käsikirjoitusten lokerikkoon, mutta pelastui roskixesta virkailijan erehdyxen vuoksi. Vaikka agentuuri ei ollut yleisesti ottaen kiinnostunut lastenkirjallisuudesta, se lopulta hyväksyi Rowlingin asiakkaakseen, mikä luonnollisesti ilahdutti kirjailijaa.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 412: Virtauxen vahvistuttua hän osti 425 000 punnalla talon alakerran Edinburghista osoitteesta 1 Abbotsford Park.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 431: JK Rowling took another tossing on Twitter on Sunday as she tweeted that “many health professionals are concerned that young people struggling with their mental health are being shunted towards hormones and surgery when this may not be in their best interests.”
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 503: Naimin selitys mixi hikipajateema trendasi just vuosituhannen vaihteessa on tosi outo: se johtui siitä että brändeistä oli tullut ostajakunnan toteemeja, jonkinasteisia hyvixiä, eikä vaan tollasia "firmoja jotka käärii rahaa". Sellasilta tollanen ois ollut A-OK, mutta esikuvilta ei siedetä ilmitulevia lankeemuxia. Kauhistuxen kanahäkki, niinkö pitkälle siellä oli jo päästy kuvainpalvonnassa? Brändit oli julkkixia, ja julkkixet brändejä! Ah ulkokullaisuutta, voi kalkittuja hautoja! Kyllä nyt on Nasse-setä eli Jahve HYVIN, HYVIN VIHAINEN! Kultaiset vasikanpäät lentelevät, aavikkopuhurista ei selviä kukaan ehjänä, maa järisee, syntisäkit hukkuvat. Paizi ei, ei mitään tapahtunut, eikä tapahdu.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 507: Doonesbury sarjakuvaa ei muista kukaan, varsinkaan sen jälkeen kun Gary Trudeau (ihan aiheesta) 2015 kritisoi Charlie Hebdon piirtäjiä "for punching downward..., attacking a powerless, disenfranchised minority with crude, vulgar drawings closer to graffiti than cartoons", and thereby wandering "into the realm of hate speech" with cartoons of Muhammad. Muiden pöyristyneiden öykkärien joukossa joku paska David Frum "criticized what he called Trudeau's moral theory that holds "the privilege-bearer responsible". Eihän se nyt käy, privilege on privilege, Mariallakin oli sellainen, eikä sitä siltäkään otettu pois. Rääppä humanistiystävineen piti rinnassa "Je suis Charlie" läppyjä. Charlie Chaplin lie ollut kyseessä.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 526: Gifford was born Kathryn Lee Epstein in Paris, France, to American parents, Joan (born Cuttell; January 20, 1930 – September 12, 2017), a singer, and Aaron Epstein (March 19, 1924 – November 19, 2002), a musician and former US Navy Chief Petty Officer. Aaron Epstein was stationed with his family in France at the time of Gifford's birth. Gifford grew up in Bowie, Maryland, and attended Bowie High School.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 591: What else is new? Rana Plazan hikipajatehdas pläzähti 8v sitten Bangladeshissä.
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 604: Why are some Americans so interested in knowing what race Spaniards and Italians are? Why is this such a big deal in America?
    xxx/ellauri103.html on line 652: yhden ein ja monen myöntymisen sisään ulos liike. Kyse ole eikä oikeastaan pidäkään olla yhdestä liikkeestä. Yhden liikkeen sijasta tehdään tuhansia horisontaalisia kubilabala liikkeitä, joita yhistää pikalinkit samaan tapaan kuin nettisivustoja.Vittu tästä ei kylä tule lasta eikä paskaakaan, pelkkä pannukakku. Niinkuin tulikin.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 33:
    This is John Forbes Nash - he was a beautiful mind but mad as a hatter.

    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 36: Johnny Nash was responsible for multiple equations and mathematical breakthroughs that influenced everything from economics to geometry. Like Nash equilibrium in game theory, one of the worst ideas an ape ever stumbled on. In addition to being a genius intellectual and genius mathematician he also suffered from schizophrenia his entire adult life. Not to put too find a point to it, he was mad as a march hare.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 164: Narsisimin määritelmä puhuu jatkuvasta pöyhistelystä, kehujen tarpeesta ja empatian puutteesta. Se alkaa nuorena aikuisena ja esiintyy kaikenlaisissa tilanteissa, ja sen merkkinä on 5 seuraavista 9 oireesta:
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 206: There is a undeniable link between bad mental health and genius in a lot of geniuses. Albert Einstein was famously a strange individual who struggled to find his arse with both hands at night. Looking at Einstein it becomes clear that something is off with him. He dressed in such a strange way and always appeared disheveled. That is a sure sign of being crazy.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 234: It was not that they were unnormal. It was that they were possessed by a higher being that caused them to have such genius levels of intelligence. This possession made them less sociable because they are aware of the darkening hearts of mankind. Those who know the truth, keep it to themselves. Those who do not know the truth, live in ignorance that is bliss.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 240: True, but there's more to it than this. Schizophrenia is not caused by wisdom.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 249: Your medical society knows such "symptoms" of a schizophrenia but knows no causes and thus only gives a label to it. Do your research and you will realise that nobody knows the causes of schizophrenia except that the effect of having this label is to have different levels of neurotransmitters in the brain and the symptoms are too varied and unrelated to each other to be even considered related to the same label! Is this even logical?
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 253: Funny thing is, nobody knows why neurotransmitters are of a different level for people with "schizophrenia" and blame it on this label. Those with such illnesses were not always measured for levels of neurotransmitters, they were only assumed to have such levels of neurotransmitters by the psychiatrist who has no real medical background like that of a surgeon. To worsen it, Earthling's medical science has yet to be able to measure these levels accurately and safely! Isn't this shocking?
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 255: The truth is this: Neurotransmitters are always regulated for optimal performance due to a process called Homeostasis. This is the body's naturally intelligent way of regulating itself by creating a optimal condition using whatever resources is available to the body to make it as healthy as possible. Therefore there is no such thing as too much or too little of neurotransmitters, unless you have a state of malnourishment.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 261: This is easily proven if you can conduct human trials the correct way. This requires a deep understanding of how the body works first… including how neurotransmitters work in an overall POV, which includes knowledge of the brain, the body, the nervous system, the neurons and finally why Homeostasis is always correct. The way your education system works limits your view because you only study within your specialization. You need to become a overall learner across various disciplines to find Truths. Because the Creator is someone who knows literally EVERYTHING!
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 351: Spirit body is made of photon light that is not visible by the naked human eye of your kind unless you are clairvoyant. This is also backed by holography technology that is alien to your kind. When you finally catch up with your advancement of science… especially quantum mathematics, your findings will differ from your so-called modern science.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 353: All these will be discovered by your scientists one day if your kind is open to new information. These new information are just facts waiting to be proven and to be accepted by your mainstream. Proving is easy, spreading them to the rigid minds of people is hard! This message is for an intended audience only.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 355: The truth is out there. I often hear it whisper to me through my molar, which has become a neuroreceiver. I just wish the voices were not so angry with me.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 357: P.S. POV in this context most likely stands for Person On the Verge.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 669: The effects of removal of the common variance spread across the older clinical scales due to a general factor common to psychopathology, through use of sophisticated psychometric methods, was described as a paradigm shift in personality assessment.]
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 671: Critics of the new scales argue that the removal of this common variance makes the RC scales less ecologically valid (less like real life) because real patients tend to present complex patterns of symptoms.[citation needed] Proponents of the MMPI-2-RF argue that this potential problem is addressed by being able to view elevations on other RC scales that are less saturated with the general factor and, therefore, are also more transparent and much easier to interpret.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 739: Pulkku oli 33 vuonna 1977 kun sen tää esikoiskirja Apinanleipäpuu itki ilmestyi. Kyllä se on lutukka, vaikka kovin nuori, leuat kasvantaviärät, partaradikaali, selvä leptosomi. Se oli just samanlainen väpelö puolijumalinen mielisairaanhoitaja kuin Paavo, kunnes vanhemmiten menestyxen loppumiseen pettyneenä setämiehistyi ja alkoi ajaa antikommunismin asiaa. Ihan vissisti sen takapiruna siinä oli se 100% jumalinen Vuokko vaimo.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 788: Hysteria (kreik. hystera 'kohtu') on historiallinen tautinimeke, joka jaettiin myöhemmin kahteen alaluokkaan hysteeriseksi neuroosiksi ja konversiohysteriaksi. Hysteerinen neuroosi nimettiin uudelleen somatoformiseksi häiriöksi, ja nykyisin siitä käytetään nimitystä somatisaatiohäiriö (F45.0). Konversiohysteria nimettiin uudelleen konversiohäiriöksi, jota nimikettä käytetään edelleen suomalaisessa psykiatriassa, vaikka sairauden virallinen nimi on muuttunut dissosiaatiohäiriöksi (F44). Osa lääkäreistä on ruvennut kutsumaan hysteriaa psykogeeniseksi, toiminnalliseksi tai lääketieteellisesti selittämättömäksi häiriöksi.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 806: Pulkkinen on sisällyttänyt antiromaaniinsa kirjoittamishetkellä ajankohtaisia teemoja, kuten Puolan sotatilan, Suomen idänpolitiikan arvostelun, Afrikka-kokemuksensa ja kehitysyhteistyökritiikin, omaa henkilöhistoriaansa, omat todelliset ja fiktiiviset kirjansa, lukemattomat lainaukset mm. sosiaalipsykologisesta kirjallisuudesta.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1069: Jokahisellen. Ota ota vain hyvät evväät! Siellon sitani palavilammasta, jottet sianpiätä pelekästään!
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1171: Olishan se toki parempi jos patriarkalismi säilyisi koko meiningissä, mutta kirkkohallituxessa ja saarnatuolissa ei siitä päästä päättämään, tehdään siis edes mitä voidaan. Tässä on Johnulla taas tämmönen sorites-argumentti, että kun et tätä klapia jaxanut, et jaxa tuotakaan, kun on alkuun päästy niin antaa mennä vaan. Mikä pannahisen vika muka on kaxinaismoraalissa, kun jumalakin on suorastaan kolminainen? Ei kai tässä mitään laajennettua matematiikkaa tarvita?
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1181: Tää Fukuyama on tullut vastaan ennenkin, se oli amerikkalaisen talousliberalismin ja globalisaation pahimpia asianajajia, joka aivan riemastui kun NL kaatui, sanoi että nyt tuli historian loppu. Haista paska Fukuyama, maailmanloppuhan tässä näyttää pikemminkin olevan tulossa.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1228: Seppo Heinola: Raamatun käännöksen ja fundament. tulkinnan mukaan mies oli ensin, mutta biologinen fakta on se, että ihmisen perusmuoto on nainen. Kaikki sikiöt ovat ensin tyttöjä, kunnes jotkut alkavat y-kromosomin SRI geenin vaikutuksesta miehistyä. Jäänteenä tästä alkunaisellisuudesta ovat mm. miehen nisät. En tiedä mixi miehellä on nisät se on mysteeri mutta pidän mysteereistä, sanoo  vaaleenpunanen katolinen ämmä Black is new Orangessa transuneekerille eikä anna sille hormonilääkettä. Vitun izekäs kusipää.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1236: Jukka Hautala: Perustamani Augustinuksen pitkän siittimen varjo – niminen yritys auttaa ymmärtää, miksi kirkko ei ole vielä vastannut homoille "tahdon". Seksi on ollut lähtökohtaisesti syntiä, ja hyväksyttävää ainoastaan avioliittoon vihittyjen kesken lisääntymistarkoituksessa. Tätä puutteenalaista historiaa olemme eläneet ja elämme – ja se on hyvä. Kotikylälläni eräällä miehellä oli vain yksi lapsi. Kun ystävät kysyivät häneltä, ettei teillä useampaa ajateltu, mies vastasi: ”En tuota kehannut ruveta naatiskelemaan”. Hänen vastauksensa oli hyvin ”augustinolainen”.
    xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1346: Kategoria(t): Elämä ja yhteiskunta, Kielet ja kulttuurit, Väärinymmärryksiä. Kirjoittaja: Arto Mustajoki. Lisää kestonilkki kirjanmerkkeihisi.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 38: This development could open up a bizarre vision of the universe in which black holes can cough themselves into nothingness, Hawking said during recent lectures on the BBC and at Harvard. “This raises a serious problem that strikes at the heart of our understanding of science,” he said. “If determinism, the predictability of the universe, breaks down with black holes, it could break down in other situations,” he said. “Even worse, if determinism breaks down, we can’t be sure of our past history, either. The history books and our memories could just be illusions,” he said. The Nobel prize could just be an illusion, he said. Two years later he died.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 46: General relativity also works perfectly well as a low-energy effective quantum field theory. For questions like the low-energy scattering of photons and gravitons, for instance, the Standard Model coupled to general relativity is a perfectly good theory. It only breaks down when you ask questions involving invariants of order the Planck scale, where it fails to be predictive; this is the problem of "nonrenormalizability."
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 50: Gravity is more subtle, though: the real problem is not so much nonrenormalizability as high-energy behavior inconsistent with local quantum field theory. In quantum mechanics, if you want to probe physics at short distances, you can scatter particles at high energies. (You can think of this as being due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, if you like, or just about properties of Fourier transforms where making localized wave packets requires the use of high frequencies.) By doing ever-higher-energy scattering experiments, you learn about physics at ever-shorter-length scales. (This is why we build the LHC to study physics at the attometer length scale.)
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 52: With gravity, this high-energy/short-distance correspondence breaks down. If you could collide two particles with center-of-mass energy much larger than the Planck scale, then when they collide their wave packets would contain more than the Planck energy localized in a Planck-length-sized region. This creates a black hole. If you scatter them at even higher energy, you would make an even bigger black hole, because the Schwarzschild radius grows with mass. So the harder you try to study shorter distances, the worse off you are: you make black holes that are bigger and bigger and swallow up ever-larger distances. No matter what completes general relativity to solve the renormalizability problem, the physics of large black holes will be dominated by the Einstein action, so we can make this statement even without knowing the full details of quantum gravity.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 54: This tells us that quantum gravity, at very high energies, is not a quantum field theory in the traditional sense. It's a stranger theory, which probably involves a subtle sort of nonlocality that is relevant for situations like black hole horizons.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 56: None of this is really a contradiction between general relativity and quantum mechanics. For instance, string theory is a quantum mechanical theory that includes general relativity as a low-energy limit. What it does mean is that quantum field theory, the framework we use to understand all non-gravitational forces, is not sufficient for understanding gravity. Black holes lead to subtle issues that are still not fully understood. But not contradictions, just lacunae.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 84: Ex nihilo, nihil fit – is one of the propositions to which great significance was attributed in metaphysics. The proposition is either to be viewed as just a barren tautology, nothing is nothing, or, if becoming is supposed to have real meaning in it, then, since only nothing comes from nothing, there is in fact none in it, for the nothing remains nothing in it. Becoming entails that nothing not remain nothing, but that it pass over into its other, being. – Later metaphysics, especially the Christian, rejected the proposition that out of nothing comes nothing, thus asserting a transition from nothing into being; no matter how synthetically or merely imaginatively it took this proposition, there is yet even in the most incomplete unification of being and nothing a point at which they meet, and their distinguishedness vanishes. –
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 85: The proposition, nothing comes from nothing, nothing is just nothing, owes its particular importance to its opposition to becoming in general and hence also to the creation of the world out of nothing. Those who zealously hold firm to the proposition, nothing is just nothing, are unaware that in so doing they are subscribing to the abstract pantheism of the Eleatics and essentially also to that of Spinoza. The philosophical view that accepts as principle that being is only being, nothing only nothing, deserves the name of 'system of identity'; this abstract identity is the essence of pantheism. - Hegel, 'Becoming', in 'The Science of Logic', 1812. [Kay Sage, 'Arithmetic of Breaking Wind', 1947]
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 89: On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (German: Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde) is an elaboration on the classical Principle of Sufficient Reason, written by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer as his doctoral dissertation in 1813. The principle of sufficient reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason or cause. Schopenhauer revised and re-published it in 1847. The work articulated the centerpiece of many of Schopenhauer's arguments, and throughout his later works he consistently refers his readers to it as the necessary beginning point for a full understanding of his further writings.)
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 93: The Principle of Reason, the text of an important and influential lecture course that Martin Heidegger gave in 1955-56, takes as its focal point Leibniz's principle: nothing is without reason. Heidegger shows here that the principle of reason is in fact a principle of being. Much of his discussion is aimed at bringing his readers to the "leap of thinking," which enables them to grasp the principle of reason as a principle of being. This text presents Heidegger's most extensive reflection on the notion of history and its essence, the Geschick of being, which is considered on of the most important developments in Heidegger's later thought. One of Heidegger's most artfully composed texts, it also contains important discussions of language, translation, reason, objectivity, and technology as well as remarkable readings of Leibniz, Kant, Aristotle, and Goethe, among others. And lots of black-and-white pictures of scantily dressed women.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 95: Hawkingista toi periaate on yhtä höpöä kuin jumala. Olen ihan samaa mieltä. Jos jumala olisi olemassa, Stephen kysyisi siltä mixi se teki kaikesta niin hankalaa. Sitä mahtaisi moni muukin kysellä. Jumala ei luonut maailmankaikkeutta koska sillä ei ollut aikaa. Monet eläkkeelle lähtijät sanovat että nythän ne kiireet vasta alkoivat. Varsin valehtelevat. Aika on kyllä vähissä, mutta kenellä nyt sinne päin on niin kiirettä. Usko kuolemanjälkeisen elämään on pelkkää toiveajattelua. Sitähän se usko on: lujaa luottamusta siihen mitä ei ole näköpiirissä, mutta toivoisi olevan. "Tietyllä tavalla elämämme jatkuu geeneissä ja meemeissä", lohduttaa Stephen. Niinpä niin. Sitä jäi suremaan 3 lasta ja kiltti Jane.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 121: Se on ristiriita jos mä oon enkä ole samalla aikapaikalla. Sekin jos mua on eka yx ja sitten kax samalla kohdalla. Kohta ei voi millään olla sama. Feynman meinaskin että historioita on lähes identtisiä rinnakkaisia kopioita.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 132: Einsteinin avaruus on neliulotteinen liikkeen avaruus. Käyrät siinä on historiamatoja. No jääköön tää, tästä menee pää vaan entistä sekaisemmaxi.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 139: Tuomiokirkon kello oli 2018 Hawkingille 2 min vajaa Götterdämmerung. Se johtui Trumpista. Liekö Joe kääntänyt nyt viisareita taaxepäin. Onko alarmismi ajanhukkaa vai onko se ajankohtaista kakkosesta? Menestysteoxeni ajan lyhyt historia venyi niin että oon nyt 76-vuotias. Olen epämiellyttävä ja tietoinen ajan kulumisesta. Aika hidastuu kun vauhti lisääntyy. Ikävä kyllä rollaattori ei ylittänyt valon nopeutta. Loppui sekin 2-minuuttinen. Aikalisää ei annettu ajan asiantuntijalle.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 173: Joo tää Breakthrough Starshot on tosiaan tämmönen transhumanistien huuhaayritys. Jotain kärpäsenkakan kokoisia avaruuslaivoja joita vauhditetaan maasta käsin gigatonnien valonsäteellä. Se rahoitetaan Yuri Milnerin, Stephen Hawkingin, ja Facebookin sokeritoukan irtorahoilla. Sinnekö niiden meidän selkänahasta kiskomat pennoset nyt menevät, valonsäteinä avaruuden tyhjyyteen ison ydinvoimalan tehoilla? Voi jumalauta, en paremmin sano, vaikka Pekka kauhistuu. "Tarjoavat ihmiskunnalle tilaisuuden." Haistakaa kuulkaa ihan vittu! Kutistakaa mieluummin kulti Milner ja Sokerivuori kärpäsenkakan kokoisixi ja flengatkaa ne stratosfääriin minitähdixi!
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 192: Olin Muskin kanssa Future of Life-instituutin hississä. Meillä oli ihanaa. Saavutimme painottomuuden tunteita. Mielestäni on tärkeää, että kaikki tietävät miten meillä oli ihanaa. Mielestäni on tärkeää, ettei historiaan enää kiinnitetä huomiota, vaan kazeet suunnataan tekoälykkäästi tulevaisuuteen. Ainoa asia minkä historiasta opimme on että emme opi siitä mitään. Mixi siis vaivautua. Uuden teknologian avulla voimme korjata vaurioita, joita edelliset teknologiat ovat tehneet luonnolle. Paizi että emme käytä sitä siihen, vaan entistä tehokkaampaan rikastumiseen luonnon kustannuxella. Mitäpä leobardi mahtaa täplilleen.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 205: Seisomme kaikilla tieteenaloilla merkittävien uusien kexintöjen kynnyxellä. Useitakin tärkeitä mahdollisuuxia! Ymmärrämme mistä reiästä elämä syntyi maapallolla ja mihinkä reikään se katosi. Saatamme jopa selvittää, onko munalla maailmankaikkeudessa mahixia! Viestimme älykkäiden maahanmuuttajien kaa! Emme voi enää kazoa izeämme silmiin yhä saastuneemmalla ja ylikansoitetulla planeetalla. Emme voi seisoa jalkaterät sisäänpäin. Olen optimisti jolla on uskoa vaikka siirtää planeettoja radaltaaN ja panna niiden sijaan tekokuita! Tarina ei pääty täh--- Täh? Kuka, minäkö? Hei tää hissi lähti nyt alaspäin! Kuka painoi väärää nappulaa? Mähän suuntasin kazeeni ylös tähtiin enkä alas jalkoihini! Anna anteexi eno että katosin, sanomatta sanaakaan. Otin viestejä vastaan kaukaa, vieraita planeetoilta. Nojoo. Hei Tapsa, vielä yxi asia, kuuntele nyt hyvin tarkasti: HAISTA KUULE PSSKA!
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 210: Although I did not know Prof. Hawking, I do have ALS, which puts me in a similar situation. He has to have someone to help him. As simple as that. Although they may use a Hoyer lift, and if he still values his privacy, he may also use a bidet rather than being wiped. This is a terribly debilitating illness, that presents new challenges at every turn.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 225: It might feel insulting to god to find atheist Steve buried in his home. If he doesn't mind why should you.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 255: Einsteinin jumala ei heitä noppaa. Heisenbergin autossa oli karvanopat. Se oli niin rikas, että se ei pannut muniaan yhteen koriin. Feynmanin historiassa Englanti voittaa jalkapallon mestaruuden uudestaan. Brexitiä ei ole. Fysiikka on vaikeampaa kuin Brexitin estäminen. Mutta ne selviämme siitä! Siis selvisimme. Yhdessä vaihtoehtoisessa historiassa, ei tosin tässä.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 352: Ei se uskonnollisuus mihkään häviä, eipä ei. Sama se mihkä tartutaan, jotain pitää kexiä ettei synkkä kuolema veisi meittiä. Vaan vie se kumminkin. Nytkö sitten kuollaan kysyi Pirkko Hiekkala kuolinvuoteella, aseistariisuvasti. Mitäs sitä kieltämään, nytpä nyt. Ihmiset uskoo mihin tahansa, 20% suomalaisista jopa sielunvaelluxeen. Hullua, eihän siinä ole mitään järkeä! Synnyt uudelleen kärpäsexi ja putoot Pekan soppaan, onpa hienoa. Pekka läimäyttää sut hengiltä oikean käden nopealla läimäyxellä kuin jehova ja eikun takas alkuruutuun taas. Etkä edes muista siitä mitään! Toista se on raamatussa, jossa saadaan valkotakki päälle niinkuin lääkäreillä, huuliharppu käteen ja eikun hissaudutaan pilven päälle hoosiannaa laulamaan kolmijalkaiselle jumalalle. Siis aivan pöhkö juttu! Miten ne jaxaa höpsästellä noin lapsellisia, isot miehet, vanhat ja lihavat? No niitä pelottaa, ja onhan se hienoa jo täällä murheen laaxossa kun kirjat myy ja seurakunta läpyttää. Taidan uskoa että Pekka syntyy uudelleen kärpäsex. Se ei kyllä olis suuri muutos nykyiseen, mutta sentään parannus. Mee ja tee parannus Pekka! Ota vuoteesi ja käy!
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 362: Teoria joka selittää kaiken ei selitä enää mitään! Ne on menneet omaan ansaansa! (Kukas tässä lukee kuin piru raamattua? En sano nimiä, muze on yx emerituslääkäri... Hui kauhistus ton potilaaxi ei olis terveellistä joutua.) Galaxeja pitää koossa joku pimeä aine, mitä sekin on? Onko se lisää jumalan pieruja? Mikä niitä ajaa erilleen? Pimeiden pierujen energia! Tää kuulostaa ihan horoskoopilta. Kyllä kaleidoskooppikin toimii paremmin. Ja stetoskooppi. Peräreikään kazon periskoopilla. Ei näistä kukaan tiedä hölkäsen pölähtävää! Paizi me, jotka voimme lukea viimeisimmän tiedon Genesixestä.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 454: Sinunko pyllystäsi päivä paistaa? Ei vaan minun, vastaa ize Jehova. On tää aika ad hominen argumentointia. God throwing his weight around. Se joka panee turpiin toiselle on oikeassa, niinkuin keskiajalla. Samansuuntaista uhoomista nazoilla ja expertiisillä on Kalevalassa, siinä kohtaa missä Väiski ja Jouko antaa sanan sanasta. Jehova oikein kerskuu biologian tiedoilla. Oikeasti hevoset on vitun säikkyjä, eikä ihme, ne on pakoeläimiä, kasvissyöjiä. Ketähän ne jumalan muut pojat olivat? Mystistä.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 474: David Berlinski (born 1942) is a apostate Jewish-American author who has written books about mathematics and the history of science as well as other fiction. He is a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute´s Center for Science and Culture, a center dedicated to promulgating the pseudoscience of intelligent design.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 476: David Berlinski was born in the United States in 1942 to German-born Jewish refugees who had immigrated to New York City after escaping from France while the Vichy government was collaborating with the Germans. His father was Herman Berlinski, a composer, organist, pianist, musicologist and choir conductor, and his mother was Sina Berlinski (née Goldfein), a pianist, piano teacher and voice coach. Both were born and raised in Leipzig where they studied at the Conservatory, before fleeing to Paris where they were married and undertook further studies. German was David Berlinski´s first spoken language. He earned his PhD in philosophy from Princeton University.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 478: After his PhD, Berlinski was a research assistant in the Department of Biology at Columbia University for less than one year. He has taught philosophy, mathematics and English at Stanford University, Rutgers, the City University of New York and the Université de Paris [citation needed]. He was a research fellow at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria and the Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques (IHES) in France [citation needed. Maybe it is all a bunch of lies.]
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 480: Berlinski has written works on systems analysis, the history of differential topology, analytic philosophy, and the philosophy of mathematics. Berlinski has authored books for the general public on mathematics and the history of mathematics. These include The Secrets of the Vaulted Sky (2003), aimed to redeem astrology as "rationalistic"; Publishers Weekly described the book as offering "self-consciously literary vignettes ... ostentatious erudition and metaphysical pseudo-profundities".
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 482: Berlinski´s books have received mixed reviews, and been criticized for containing historical and mathematical inaccuracies. One critic said, "I haven't learned anything from [Berlinski's] book except that the novel of mathematics is best written in another style." He is the author of several detective novels starring private investigator Aaron Asherfeld, and a number of shorter works of fiction and non-fiction.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 484: An opponent of biological evolution, Berlinski is a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, a Seattle-based think tank that is a hub of the pseudoscientific intelligent design movement. Berlinski shares the movement's rejection of the evidence for evolution, but does not openly avow intelligent design and describes his relationship with the idea as: "warm but distant. It's the same attitude that I display in public toward my ex-wives." Berlinski is a critic of evolution, yet, "Unlike his colleagues at the Discovery Institute,...[he] refuses to theorize about the origin of life." Vitun jutku, ei niihin ole luottamista, jeesuxen murhaajiin.
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 490: Professor Stuart Burgess. About: I have a passion for designing engineering systems including bio-inspired designs. Like many scientists I believe that the natural world has a Designer. The purpose of this website is to share some of my design work and to share personal views about why I believe in a Creator. Below is a picture of me holding our two family Chihuahuas – Bambi and Minnie. They were created by the Creator, not me. My creation articles:
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 496: This is what Dawkins has written about the origin of life:
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 502: How dense can these creation types really be? Wanting very much for something to be true turns people into imbeciles. The least one can say for Dawkins is that he knows what he doesn´t know. He his happy to just wait and see. One of my daughters challenged the teacher and said, “Miss, you keep saying ‘evolution did it,’ but you never actually explain how evolution did it.” The teacher had to confess that my daughter made a valid criticism, and the rest of class agreed. So what? How did god create the snake? Did he roll it like Gary Larson shows, or did he use some other method? Did he just make a hypnotic gesture? (Yes, see below.)
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 560: Shell-shocked, Isis set out to find all the pieces of Osiris’s body. Aided by Nephthys, Isis was able to retrieve all the body parts of Osiris, except Osiris penis. Isis called on the god Anubis to help in the mummification process. After that, she cast a magical spell on Osiris dismembered parts, bringing him back to life. However, he did not come back in his old self. He was instead reborn in the land of the dead (the Underworld). Before he departed for the Underworld, Isis mated with him and became pregnant with Horus (the falcon-headed god. Apparently the missing penis was located eventually.)
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 591: Negro napattiin ize teossa raiskausyrityxestä Tulsassa 100v sitten. Kengänkiillottaja astui vahingossa valkoisen hissitytön varpaille joka kiljahti. Tästä alkoi Tulsan lynkkausaalto Oklahomassa jossa poltettiin neekereiden Wall Street maan tasalle ja tapettiin kostoxi tyhjästä koululuokallinen mutiaisia (tai ehkä 10x enemmän, ei kukaan laskenut). 10K savunaamaa jäi kodittomaxi tuhannesta poltetusta kämpästä. Asuivat kuin sillit suolassa. Ketään ei rankaistu. Korvauxia ei maxettu. Ne juuttuivat senaattiin. 9 tapauksessa 10:stä ongelmissa jenkeissä on mukana musta nuori. 9 tapauksessa 10:stä senaattori jenkeissä on kobra vanha valkoinen. Tyttö sanoi vielä jälkeenpäin ettei siinä mitään tapahtunut, varpaisiinkaan ei sattunut. Se vaan säikähti.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 37: Sixi eri romaanejakaan ei ole kuin kourallinen, ja eri juonia vielä vähemmän. Kohta en jaxa enää lukea aina noita samoja toisteisia juttuja. 60-luvun kalutuista paloista 2020-luvun klikkiozikoihin, ihan sitä samaa persepäisyyttä, ja sitä löytyy loputtomiin lisää koko kirjoitetun historian pituudelta.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 69: ”Olen kehitysuskoinen ihminen ja ensimmäisen kirjan (Ettekö te tiedä kuka minä olen: Ylimielisyyden historiaa, Atena 2010) jälkeen pelkäsin, että egoismi olisi ollut laskeva trendi, mutta sittemmin olen iloxeni huomannut olleeni väärässä”, sanoo Seppo Turunen, jonka mökin vessa Nurmexessa oli niin täynnä kakkaa että keko hipoi pyllyä. Mä sain siellä tyrän kantaessani juomavettä autosta maitotonkissa.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 113: Ja sitten Amerikan uutisia. Randy Fitzgerald kertoo mitä mieltä Ronald Maxwell on vasemmistoleffoista. Ne on pelkkää valehtelua. Lewis and Clark-filmiin oli tulla kohtauxia, joissa Lewis ja Clark riitelivät. Sellaiseen ei ole minkäänlaista historiallista evidenssiä! Kyselytutkimuxessa on selvinnyt, mistä kenkä puristaa: lähes 2/3 haastatelluista elokuvaohjaajista uskoi, että amerikkalaisen yhteiskunnan rakenne saa aikaan vieraantumista. Tälläsestä ei ole minkäänlaista evidenssiä! Yli puolella niistä ei ollut minkäänlaista uskonnollista vakaumusta! Ei ihme että niiden leffoissa uskontoa pilkataan, hyväxytään moraallinen epävarmuuus ja samastetaan vauraus ja pahuus sekä ihannoidaan aseetonta väkivaltaa. Esim Roland Joffen ydinpommielokuva näyttää aidolta, mutta se vääntää atomipommin kehitystarinan ydinvoiman vastaisen liikkeen mainoxexi. Ei pommia, ei ydinvoimaa; ilman ydinvoimaa, ei pommia. Hetkinen mitä tarkoitatte Lucky Luke, selittäkääpä tarkemmin! Jossain toisessa leffassa Thomas Jefferson bylsii 15-vuotiasta neekeriä, tästäkään ei ole mitään evidenssiä!
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 115: Sarah (Sally) Hemings (c. 1773 – 1835) was an enslaved woman of mixed race owned by President Thomas Jefferson. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that Jefferson had a long-term sexual relationship with Hemings, and historians now broadly agree that he was the father of her six children. Hemings was a half-sister of Jefferson's wife, Martha Jefferson (née Wayles). Four of Hemings' children survived into adulthood. Hemings died in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 1835.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 117: The historical question of whether Jefferson was the father of Hemings' children is the subject of the Jefferson–Hemings controversy. Following renewed historical analysis in the late 20th century, and a 1998 DNA study (completed in 1999 and published as a report in 2000) that found a match between the Jefferson male line and a descendant of Hemings' youngest son, Eston Hemings, the Monticello Foundation asserted that Jefferson fathered Eston and likely her other five children as well. However, there are some who disagree. In 2018, the Thomas Jefferson Foundation of Monticello announced its plans to have an exhibit titled Life of Sally Hemings, and affirmed that it was treating as a settled issue that Jefferson was the father of her known children. The exhibit opened in June 2018.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 122: What more than anything is missing in recent films, and shines splendidly in Maxwell’s films, is the sense of glory, the feeling that some have lived on an elevated plane according to the dictates of the highest sense of duty and honor. It’s an unfashionable feeling today, and mocked by those who conspicuously lack it, who love weakly, who think solely in quotidian, political terms. It cannot be understood by those without religious faith, for Heaven is a City of Glory and glory is the special attribute of a God who, if hidden, nevertheless offers us a glimpse of the special virtue of his glory in the lives of those who in moments of danger are willing to sacrifice themselves for a cause they think greater than themselves; and that, above the messiness of political squabbles, is the message behind Maxwell’s films. (The American Spectator 2015)
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 124: Ron Maxwell is (or was) an ardent Trump supporter. He fears some truly inspired Shakespeare director is sure to portray Duncan as Trump, so that Macbeth can spend a full five minutes frenetically stabbing him in his sleep, which should provide ample time for the Trump hating zealots to achieve their ultimate catharsis. But this does not make Trump a villain. As with all of Shakespeares characters, Trump is entirely human in his complexity and contradiction. Shakespeare for dummies indeed.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 235: Laurin kädet ovat revityt: hyttyset käyvät kuumina, ovat aivan hurjina. Lauri hissutteli koko yön valveilla niiden perässä sähkömaila ojossa. Seija rähisi kun ei saanut nukkua. Tätäkään en saanut kirjoittaa rauhassa kun kuolemaa halvexivat itikat teki tauotta stukamaisia kamikazesyöxyjä kuni tikat.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 263: This is the word of the Lord that came to Jeremiah the prophet concerning Elam, early in the reign of Zedekiah king of Judah: (Zedekiah ruled the Southern Kingdom from 597 to 586 BC).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 264: This is what the Lord Almighty says:
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 271: (Genesis 11:2) says that after the flood the new population of Earth spread out from the east. They found a plain in Shinar and settled there. This plain is where the Tirgis and Euphrates Rivers flow parallel to each other toward the Persian Gulf. It became known as Mesopotamia which means “between the rivers.” The Zagros mountains are due east of Mesopotamia whereas the mountains of Ararat, traditional location of the Ark, are several hundred miles to the north.)
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 274: THAT WAS ONLY THE BEGINNING. But this did not fulfill Jeremiah’s prophecy, which wouldn’t even be given for at least another 50 years. Susa was rebuilt, only to be conquered again, this time by the Persian King Cyrus. It was rebuilt again and renovated by King Darius the Great to serve as the capital of the Persian Empire. Susa was mentioned in Daniel 8:2 as the location where the prophet received a vision recorded in Daniel 8 of the subsequent conquest of the Persian Empire by Alexander the Great. This prophecy was fulfilled two hundred years later when Susa surrendered without a battle to Alexander.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 275: Daniel 8:2 identifies Susa as being in the province of Elam, indicating it was already a part of the Persian Empire at the time. From this brief history it appears that all but the last verse of Jeremiah’s prophecy was fulfilled in the Assyrian and Persian conquests. By the way, Daniel was buried in Susa and his tomb has been preserved to this day because he has always been highly revered among the Persian people.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 277: WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? A case can be made for the view that “Persian” and “Elamite” are not two names for the same people but that having conquered Elam, Persia became the successor to Elam, whose original inhabitants, as Jeremiah’s prophecy indicates, have been scattered to the four winds and absent from the pages of history for over 2,500 years. Evidence of the difference in origin between the Elamites and the Persians came from the mouth of none other than Persian King Darius the Great who said, “I am Darius, the great king, the king of kings, the king of many countries and many people, the king of this expansive land, the son of Wishtaspa of Achaemenid, Persian, the son of a Persian, ‘Aryan’, from the Aryan race” (From Darius the Great’s Inscription in Naqshe-e-Rostam).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 278: Some scholars say Iran means “land of the Aryans” and claim that the Iranians are not descendants of Shem, as the Elamites were, but more likely came from Japeth, whose descendants are mostly Caucasians. This supports the view that Elam and Persia are not different names for the same people. Also, the native languages of the two groups were different.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 279: This may explain why Ezekiel, who wrote from Babylon at the same time Jeremiah was writing from Jerusalem, identified one of the major participants in the Battle of Ezekiel 38 as being Persia, and not Elam. God might have informed him, as He did Jeremiah, that the Elamites would be conquered and scattered to the four winds by their Persian neighbors.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 283: For an instant, I thought I had offended him. Then, as if he was correcting a child, He said, “Persians are not Arabs. We’re Caucasians.”) But there’s one verse that prevents us from proclaiming Jeremiah’s prophecy to be completely fulfilled in history. Jeremiah 49:39 says, “Yet I will restore the fortunes of Elam in days to come, declares the Lord.”
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 285: WHAT HAPPENED TO ELAM? There’s no record of a re-emergence of the Elamites since the Persian conquest 2500 years ago. Some say Jeremiah 49:39 is currently being fulfilled through the Iranians. They say this partly because Iran’s primary nuclear facilities are in the area once called Elam. Its recently completed nuclear reactor in Bushehr lies on the eastern shore of the Persian Gulf in the heart of ancient Elam. If that’s the case then God’s restoration of Elam’s fortunes is both brief and haphazard, its stated purpose is opposed to God’s plan for Israel, and it is doomed to end in even more destruction.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 287: Currently, the most popular view is that the complete fulfillment of Jeremiah’s prophecy is for our time and will take place shortly through Iran’s defeat in the Battle of Ezekiel 38. But if that’s true, then the Iranian people will have to be scattered among all the nations following their defeat and then somehow regain God’s favor during Daniel’s 70th Week in order for the last verse to be fulfilled. There’s simply no good reason to believe this will happen. After one brief reference in Ezekiel 38:5, the future of Persia is never mentioned in the Bible again.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 288: I think it’s reasonable to expect prophecies that have only been partially fulfilled in history to have their ultimate fulfilment in our future. The idea that a partial historical fulfilment points to a complete future fulfilment is a well established principle in the Bible. Two examples we’ve reviewed recently are Isaiah 17 and Psalm 83. The literal and complete fulfilment of these prophecies has not happened yet.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 291: There are other cases of nations being as totally erased from history and then suddenly reappearing. Israel and Babylon are two obvious examples. But with both of them there are multiple chapters with detailed descriptions of their re-emergence and subsequent destiny. With Elam we get one non-definitive verse.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 293: LET’S TRY TO BE MORE CAREFUL. I think there are a number of people today who are guilty of interpreting Bible prophecy in light of current events when the reverse is supposed to happen. We are supposed to interpret current events in light of Bible prophecy. These people read the world news and then scour the Bible for prophetic verses that seem to fit without fully researching their history to see to what extent they’ve already been fulfilled. Many of them are novices where Bible prophecy is concerned, but some should know better.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 295: We also need to remember that Bible prophecy only illuminates world history where Israel is concerned. Great Empires have come and gone during Israel’s absence without so much as a hint of their existence in the Bible. Even the United States, by any measure the most successful of them all, is missing from the prophetic record. You can’t tell me God didn’t know these empires were coming, so their absence has to mean that He sees them as irrelevant to Israel’s destiny. Don’t get me wrong, He has used them all to advance His plan for His people, and they were all blessed through their time of participation. But He didn’t find any of them worthy of mention because He didn’t actually need any of them to fulfil His plan.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 302: EDOM, MOAB, AND AMMON. Here’s a brief summary of the history and prophecy concerning these three neighbors of Israel who always seem to wind upon the wrong side of things where the Lord is concerned.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 314: Moab and Ammon were named after the children of the incestuous unions of Lot and his two daughters. Lot was an unknowing participant, having been made intoxicated by his daughters, who saw becoming pregnant by their father as their only way to produce any offspring. Every other man they knew had perished in the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19:30-38).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 320: ammoniitit, esihistoriallisten merieläinten ryhmä
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 335: Realizing they needed separate pasturelands because their herds would now be too large for them to remain together, Esau took his Canaanite wives and all he owned and moved some distance away into the hill country of Seir, east and south of the Dead Sea, just south of Moab and Israel. Later, the Lord told Moses He had given this land to Esau and his descendants. (Deut 2:5).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 338: 400 years later, the Babylonians came as the Lord’s instrument of judgment against Israel. Edom, Moab, and Ammon all cheered for Babylon and made plans to carve up the Promised Land for themselves after the Babylonians carried Israel into captivity. This displeased the Lord and He had the Babylonians destroy them as well. Moab and Ammon ceased to exist as nations at that time (Ezekiel 25:10).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 343: EDOM, MOAB, AND AMMON IN THE END TIMES. Edom, Moab, and Ammon are listed in Psalm 83:6-7 among the participants in a scheme to destroy Israel and erase it’s name from people’s memories. By most accounts this battle has never taken place and will most likely be one of the next events on the prophetic horizon. The psalmist’s prayer is that the Lord will cause them to perish in disgrace.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 344: Edom, Moab, and Ammon are also mentioned in a prophecy from Daniel 11:41. Speaking of the anti-Christ and his end times conquest of the Middle East, Daniel said,
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 345: “He will also invade the Beautiful Land. Many countries will fall, but Edom, Moab and the leaders of Ammon will be delivered from his hand.”
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 347: The Beautiful Land is Israel, and the timing of this prophecy is during the Great Tribulation. The fact that Edom, Moab and the leaders of Ammon will be delivered from the anti-Christ’s hand indicates he will have intended to conquer them but will be unable to do so.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 348: Based on existing conditions in the world today we would interpret this prophecy as pertaining to Jordan. But this could all change with the Battle of Psalm 83 when Edom, Moab, and Ammon could come under Israel’s control again. Is that what will prevent the anti-Christ from conquering them, or is there more to it?
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 350: Rev. 12:13-17 tells us that after Satan is confined to Earth he will go after “the woman”, symbolic of Israel. But the woman will be given the wings of a great eagle, enabling her to flee into the desert to a place prepared for her, where she will be taken care of for a time, times and half a time, which is 3 ½ years, the duration of the Great Tribulation. This agrees with Matt. 24:15-21 where the Lord warned the believing remnant of Israel to flee to the mountains to escape the Great Tribulation. The closest mountains to Jerusalem are in Moab and Edom.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 352: And concerning the time of the 2nd coming, Isaiah wrote: Who is this coming from Edom, from Bozrah, with his garments stained crimson? Who is this, robed in splendor, striding forward in the greatness of his strength? “It is I, proclaiming victory, mighty to save.” Why are your garments red, like those of one treading the winepress? “I have trodden the winepress alone; from the nations no one was with me. I trampled them in my anger and trod them down in my wrath; their blood spattered my garments, and I stained all my clothing. It was for me the day of vengeance; the year for me to redeem had come. I looked, but there was no one to help, I was appalled that no one gave support; so my own arm achieved salvation for me, and my own wrath sustained me. I trampled the nations in my anger; in my wrath I made them drunk and poured their blood on the ground”
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 357: Combining these prophecies we have the anti-Christ, now indwelt by Satan, determined to rid the world of God’s people once and for all. Heeding the Lord’s 2,000 year old warning, the believing remnant will flee to the mountains of Edom where the city of Petra has been standing empty for centuries, as if in preparation. The phrase “wings of a great eagle” in Rev. 12:14 is reminiscent of Exodus 19:4 where the Lord used the same phrase to describe the way he delivered Israel from the Egyptians. This implies the same kind of supernatural assistance, such as when Satan spews out a river of water to sweep the woman away. But the Lord will open the earth to swallow the river and save the woman. This will enrage Satan, but he will leave the woman and go after other followers of Jesus (Rev. 12:15-17).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 386: Captain Cook called the north-easternmost corner of Australia Cape Tribulation. He got stranded there for a good while. I got a great order of fish and chips there and spent a night together with two German girls who whispered angrily in German about me until I said 'ich kapiere was ihr sagt'. That shut them up.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 393: Kaarle Viktor (Kalle Vihtori) Väänänen (22. maaliskuuta 1888 Kuopio – 12. elokuuta 1960 Lahti) oli suomalainen kirjailija ja oppikoulun opettaja. Väänäsen vanhemmat olivat poliisikonstaapelit Kaarlo Vilho Väänänen ja Maria Niskanen. Hän pääsi ylioppilaaksi 1907 ja valmistui filosofian kandidaatiksi ja maisteriksi 1915. Väänänen toimi luonnoonhistorian ja maantieteen opettajana Viipurin uudessa yhteiskoulussa 1922–1929, Viipurin tyttölyseossa 1929–1945 ja Lappeenrannan lyseossa 1945–1952. Talvi- ja jatkosodan aikana Väänänen oli viihdytysjoukoissa. Vuosina 1945−1947 Väänänen oli komennettuna opettajaksi Valtion sisäoppilaitokseen (”Internaatti”) Niinisalon varuskuntaan. Väänänen oli naimisissa Alma Maria Vanamon (ent. Vilander) kanssa vuosina 1912–1945. Avioeron jälkeen hän meni uusiin naimisiin 1948 Kerttu Vainion (ent. Grönlund) kanssa. Väänänen kirjoitti myös nimimerkeillä K. V., Korsukolportööri ja Laulajapoika. Osassa teoksiaan hän käytti savveettee murreettee. Hän laati myös luonnon- ja maantieteellisten kirjojen arvosteluja ja pakinoita sekä suomennoksia, mm. Wilhelm Buschin teoksista. Pojat joit ei saatu hyvix ym. on Kallen kynästä. Minnee puhee savvee murrreettee.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 452: Toivola kertoo kirjassaan myös siitä, miten miehisyys oli hänelle vuosikausia vaikea asia. Poikana hän koki olevansa liian herkkä, tyttömäinen ja kiinnostunut vääristä asioista, samoin aikuisena miehenä. Nuorena hän pelkäsi olevansa liian lihava homoksi.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 464: Huomioiden homoyhteisön historian on surullista, että kuva omasta peniksestä on ylipäätään ensimmäinen tapa ottaa kontaktia toiseen ihmiseen. Au pair hakemuxessa se ei vieläkään ole way to go.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 494: Kirjeistä ja oppilaiden jälkeenjääneistä muisteluista käy hyvin ilmi, että Armas oli hyvin särmikäs persoona, särmikkäät ovat mielestäni äärettömän mielenkiintoisia, vaikka monet varmasti myöntävät, ettei heidän kanssaan aina ole helppoa elää. Itämailla poltettiin hashista ja mässäiltiin...
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 501: Nilkki Kyrvännupin pään menoxi on kuitenkin pakko todeta, että 2000-luvulla olen joutunut pettymään yliopistooni ja sen uusiin arvoihin. En voi hyväksyä ajatusta yliopistosta tehtaana, jossa kaikki tulokset mitataan rahassa ja päätökset tehdään rahan eikä tieteen näkökulmasta. Oman tieteenalani perspektiivistä on käsittämätöntä, että eläkkeelle siirtymiseni jälkeen täyttämättä jäänyt assyriologian oppituoli on ilmeisesti todellisessa vaarassa jäädäkin täyttämättä. Jos näin kävisi, Suomesta häviäisi oppiaine, joka ainoana maailmassa pystyy palauttamaan ihmiskunnan muistia tuhansien vuosien ajalta ennen kreikkalaisia, ja lähes 130 vuotta pitkä assyriologian opetus- ja tutkimustraditio, joka tällä hetkellä on maailman huipulla, häviäisi Helsingin yliopistosta. Miksi ei saman tien lakkauteta tuottamattomina ja tarpeettomina kaikkia Helsingin yliopiston antiikintutkimuksen, historian, eksegetiikan ja teologian oppituoleja? Aa, hyvä idea, siitä ottaa kopin Nilkki ja sen porukat.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 559: On mukava näin eläkkeellä tutustua maailmanhistoriaan romaanien välityksellä.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 576: Minä olen vain samallum, pikkukauppias ja kanankakankantaja, mutta niinkuin huomaatte, voin saada paljon aikaan tiedoillani, voin aiheuttaa jopa kokonaisten kaupunkien luovaa tuhoa. Mitäh, huomautti joku paimenista loukkaantuneena. Eikö paimenen virka ole kaikkein vanhin, ja eikö paimenia kunnioiteta kaikkialla? Paimen ja maanviljelijä ovat vanhimmat. Niin ja se maailman vanhin ammatti. - Läppä läppä, oikaisi tietojenkauppias (nimeltänsä Google) havaittuaan paimenten ilmeet karsaixi. (Mutta kauppa se on joka kannattaa, ja henkilöllisyyxien kauppa kumminkin, se ajatteli näin, izexensä nimittäin.) Hawkingia kiellettiin kertomasta lopun aikojen big crashista, se voisi aiheuttaa paniikkia pörssissä. Same difference, plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 585: Already in the early Bronze Age, Aleppo (Halpa) was a major city of the weather god. With the conquest of Syria by Suppiluliuma I (1355-1325 BC), this city was incorporated into the Hittite realm and Suppiluliuma installed his son Telipinu as priest-king of Aleppo. The temple of the weather god of Aleppo was adjusted to conform to Hittite cult. During the Iron Age, a new temple was dedicated to Tarhunz of Halpa.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 628: This phrase, among the Sayings of Jesus on the cross, is given in these two versions. The Matthean version of the phrase is transliterated in Greek as Ἠλί, Ἠλί, λεμὰ σαβαχθανί. The Markan version is Ἐλωΐ, Ἐλωΐ, λαμὰ σαβαχθανί (elōi rather than ēli and lama rather than lema).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 630: Overall, both versions appear to be Aramaic rather than Hebrew because of the verb שבק‎ (šbq) "abandon", which is originally Aramaic. The "pure" Biblical Hebrew counterpart to this word, עזב‎ (‘zb) is seen in the second line of Psalm 22, which the saying appears to quote. Thus, Jesus is not quoting the canonical Hebrew version (ēlī ēlī lāmā ‘azabtānī) attributed in some Jewish interpretations to King David cited as Jesus' ancestor in Matthew's Genealogy of Jesus if the Eli, Eli version of Jesus' outcry is taken; he may be quoting the version given in an Aramaic Targum (surviving Aramaic Targums do use šbq in their translations of the Psalm).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 632: The Markan word for "my god", Ἐλωΐ, definitely corresponds to the Aramaic form אלהי, elāhī. The Matthean one, Ἠλί, fits in better with the אלי of the original Hebrew Psalm, as has been pointed out in the literature; however, it may also be Aramaic because this form is attested abundantly in Aramaic as well.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 636: Almost all ancient Greek manuscripts show signs of trying to normalize this text. For instance, the peculiar Codex Bezae renders both versions with ηλι ηλι λαμα ζαφθανι (ēli ēli lama zaphthani). The Alexandrian, Western and Caesarean textual families all reflect harmonization of the texts between Matthew and Mark. Only the Byzantine textual tradition preserves a distinction.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 646: Midrashissa on paljon juttua sekä Melkisedekistä että Abramista. Joidenkuiden mielestä jumala maxoi Abrahamille kymmenyxinä sen nimestä siihen saakka puuttuneen kirjaimen H. Rabbien mielestä M. toimi pappina ja antoi Aatamin mekon perinnöxi Abrahamille (H:lla tai ilman).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 652: Aikaisempi samanniminen athinganoiden lahko sai kyytiä Marcus Eremiitalta, joka näyttää olleen Johannes Kultasuun oppipoika. Markun kirja Eis ton Melchisedek puhuu näistä uusista opettajista jotka tekee Melchisedekistä Logoxen inkarnaation (jumalan sanan siis).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 656: Tää on taas tätä Dan Brownin DaVinci koodi mystery thriller höpsästelyä, josta on myös Tom Hanx filmi, joka oli yhtä onneton. Piispat koitti laittaa niille pantoja, mutta ei ne pannahiset lopettaneet saarnaamista. Muilta osin ne näyttää olleen ortodoxeja.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 658: Pyhä Geronimo (Ep. 73) nakkaa rodeen anonyymin työn missä M. samastetaan Holy Ghostiin. Noin v. AD 600, Timotheus, Konstantinoopelin presbyteeri, kirjassaan Vääräuskoisten vastaanottokritiikki, lisää uutta pesua kaipaavien harhaoppisten listaan melchisedekiläiset (Magaralaiset), "joita kuzutaan nyttemmin nimellä Athingani. Ne asuu Phrygiassa, eivätkä ole juutalaisia eivätkä gentiilejä. Ne pitää sapattia ympärileikkaamattomina. Ne eivä koske kehenkään. Jos niille tarjoo ruokaa, ne käskee panna sen maahan; sitten ne tulee ja ottaa sen. Ne antaa tavaroita toisille yhtä varovaisesti."
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 667: Right and left play an important role in Jacob's final blessing to his grandsons, Ephraim and Manasseh (Gen. 48: 12–20), whom Joseph places at the left and right sides of Jacob, respectively (verse 13), expecting his father to place his right hand on Manasseh (the firstborn) and his left on Ephraim, and then bless them. But Jacob crosses his hands, placing his right hand on Ephraim (verse 14) and his left on Manasseh, despite Joseph's objections (verse 18). Jacob explains his actions by stating that Ephraim will be greater than Manasseh (verse 19).
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 672: As part of the Kingdom of Israel, the territories of Manasseh and Ephraim were conquered by the Assyrian Empire, and the tribe was exiled; the manner of their exile led to their further history being lost.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 676: The modern use derives from an account in the Hebrew Bible, in which pronunciation of this word was used to distinguish Ephraimites, whose dialect used a differently sounding first consonant. The difference concerns the Hebrew letter shin, which is now pronounced as [ʃ] (as in shoe). In the Book of Judges, chapter 12, after the inhabitants of Gilead under the command of Jephthah inflicted a military defeat upon the invading tribe of Ephraim (around 1370–1070 BC), the surviving Ephraimites tried to cross the River Jordan back into their home territory, but the Gileadites secured the river's fords to stop them. To identify and kill these Ephraimites, the Gileadites told each suspected survivor to say the word shibboleth. The Ephraimite dialect resulted in a pronunciation that, to Gileadites, sounded like sibboleth. In the King James Bible the anecdote appears thus (with the word already in its current English spelling):
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 684: Despite the loss of the additional history of Manasseh and Ephraim, several modern-day groups claim descent from them, with varying levels of academic and rabbinical support. The Yusufzai tribe (literal translation The Sons of Joseph) of the Pashtuns of Afghanistan, India and Pakistan, who collectively refer to themselves as the "Bani Israel", have a long tradition connecting them to the exiled Kingdom of Israel. The Samaritans claim that some of their adherents are descended from these tribes, and many Persian Jews claim to be descendants of Ephraim. Many Samaritans claim descent from the grandchildren of Joseph under four main septs, his grandsons Danfi, Tsedakah, Mafraj and Sarawi Samaritans Museum In northeast India, the Mizo Jews claim descent from Manasseh, and call themselves Bnei Menashe; in 2005 Shlomo Amar, Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel, announced that he regarded this claim to be true, which under the Law of Return allows them to migrate to Israel, as long as they formally convert to Israel's Orthodox form of Judaism. Similar traditions are held by the Telugu Jews, in South India, who claim descent from Ephraim, and call themselves Bene Ephraim.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 690: Latter-day Saints also believe that the main groups of the Book of Mormon (Nephites and Lamanites) were parts of the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh. They believe that this would be the fulfilment of part of the blessing of Jacob, where it states that "Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall" (Genesis 49:22, interpreting the "wall" as the ocean). The idea being that they were a branch of Israel that was carefully led to another land for their inheritance.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 720: The Book of Jubilees, in describing how the world was divided between Noah's sons and grandsons, says that Lud received "the mountains of Asshur and all appertaining to them till it reaches the Great Sea, and till it reaches the east of Asshur his brother" (Charles translation). The Ethiopian version reads, more clearly "... until it reaches, toward the east, toward his brother Asshur's portion." Jubilees also says that Japheth's son Javan received islands in front of Lud's portion, and that Tubal received three large peninsulae, beginning with the first peninsula nearest Lud's portion. In all these cases, "Lud's portion" seems to refer to the entire Anatolian peninsula, west of Mesopotamia.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 722: Aram oli myös suomalaisten rakastama Aram Hatshipompponen. Khachaturian always remained enthusiastic about communism, and was an atheist. When asked about his visit to the Vatican, Khachaturian responded: "I'm an atheist, but I'm a son of the [Armenian] people who were the first to officially adopt Christianity and thus visiting the Vatican was my duty."
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 732: According to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 (verses 15-19), Canaan was the ancestor of the tribes who originally occupied the ancient Land of Canaan: all the territory from Sidon or Hamath in the north to Gaza in the southwest and Lasha in the southeast. This territory, known as the Levant, is roughly the areas of modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, western Jordan, and western Syria. Canaan's firstborn son was Sidon, who shares his name with the Phoenician city of Sidon in present-day Lebanon. His second son was Heth. Canaan's descendants, according to the Hebrew Bible, include:
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 764: According to Genesis 9:20–27, Noah became drunk then cursed his grandson Canaan, for the transgression of Canaan's father, Ham. This is the Curse of Canaan, to which the misnomer "Curse of Ham" has been attached since Classical antiquity.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 766: The curse of Ham (actually placed upon Ham's son Canaan) occurs in the Book of Genesis, imposed by the patriarch Noah. It occurs in the context of Noah's drunkenness and is provoked by a shameful act perpetrated by Noah's son Ham, who "saw the nakedness of his father". The exact nature of Ham's transgression and the reason Noah cursed Canaan when Ham had sinned have been debated for over 2,000 years.
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 772: Some modern scholars view the curse of Canaan in Genesis 9:20-27 as an early Hebrew rationalization for Israel's conquest of Canaan. When Noah cursed Canaan in Genesis 9:25, he used the expression "Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants He shall be to his brethren."NKJV The expression "servant of servants", otherwise translated "slave of slaves",NIV emphasizes the extreme degree of servitude that Canaan will experience in relation to his "brothers".
    xxx/ellauri114.html on line 774: In the subsequent passage, "of Shem... may Canaan be his servant,"[9:26] the narrator is foreshadowing Israel's conquest of the promised land. Biblical scholar Philip R. Davies explains that the author of this narrative used Noah to curse Canaan, in order to provide justification for the later Israelites driving out and enslaving the Canaanites.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 50: This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 180: Élisabeth Badinter (née Bleustein-Blanchet; 5 March 1944, Boulogne-Billancourt) is a French philosopher, author and historian.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 222: Inflection of גִּזְעָנוּת, Noun – feminine. Root: ג - ז - ע. The final radical of this word is guttural; this affects the adjacent vowels. Derived from גִּזְעָן racist and ־וּת. Meaning racism. From גֶּזַע Noun – ketel pattern, masculine, Meaning trunk (of a tree); race (anthropology); stem (morphology, linguistics).
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 261: Tää kaikki aktivoitui kun löysin jostain vaihtohyllystä Marion Santo Domingo-pläjäyxen nimeltä Vuohen juhla, el fiesta del chivo. Tän San Domingon diktaattorilla Trujillolla mässyttelevän bühleinin huippukohta on seuraava Lösähdyxen märkä uni.
    Trujillo is tormented by both his incontinence and impotence. Trujillo sexually assaulted Urania. Mix just Urania? Veikkaan et tää on viittaus Löysän homofiliaan. He is unable to achieve an erection with Urania and, in frustration, rapes her with his bare hands. This event is the core of Urania's shame and hatred towards her own father. In addition, it's the cause of Trujillo's repeated anger over the "anemic little bitch" who witnessed his impotence and emotion, as well as the reason he's en route to "sleep" with another girl on the night of his assassination.

    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 266: Conceived as a novel of eroticism, this short work is centered on the quest for worldly happiness and the individual's prospects of attaining it. The medium of the quest is sensory and sexual fulfillment, and Vargas Llosa's characters conduct their lives assuming that this fulfillment is both the cause and the effect of their happiness. As in other erotic texts, the characters' responses and relationships are fueled exclusively by sensual and sexual stimulation...
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 270: Don Rigoberto is, by far, the novel's most interesting character, not because he is especially complex but because Vargas Llosa relishes in his quirks and describes them in titillating detail, creating what Anthony Burgess calls "the pornography of hygiene."
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 272: Don Rigoberto is compulsive about his personal cleanliness and his bodily functions. He appreciates them as marvelous and necessary, to be worshipped both for their sake as well as for the sake and welfare of the whole body. He devotes a day a week to the care of a different member or organ: Monday, hands; Tuesday, feet; Wednesday, ears; Thursday, nose; Friday, hair...
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 276: At night, she partakes of her husband's rich sexual rituals and fantasies and is a passive yet willing partner to his imaginative sensual flights of fancy and constant experimentation. Dona Lucrecia, a warm, sensual...
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 278: Chapters 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 14 contain a color print of a famous painting accompanied by a narration, each from a separate voice. Vizi takuulla mä kynäilin jotain sarkastista tostakin. Rigoberto, Lucrecia, Alfonso, and perhaps even Justiniana, all become the protagonist/narrator of one of the paintings by Jordaenes, Boucher, Titian, Francis Bacon, Fernando de Szyszlo, and Fra Angelico. This rather heterogenous collection of prints share the fact that they could be viewed as depicting various aspects of sensuality, from the voyeuristic to the immaculate.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 289: Mario Vargas Llosa was born to a middle-class family on March 28, 1936, in the southern Peruvian provincial city of Arequipa. He was the only child of Ernesto Vargas Maldonado (= lahjaton) and Dora Llosa Urethra (the former a radio operator in an aviation company, the latter the daughter of an old criollo family), who separated a few months before his birth. Shortly after Mario's birth, his father revealed that he was having an affair with a German woman; consequently, Mario has two younger half-brothers: Enrique and Ernesto Vargas.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 291: Vargas Llosa lived with his maternal family in Arequipa until a year after his parents' divorce, when his maternal grandfather was named honorary consul for Peru in Bolivia. With his mother and her family, Vargas Llosa then moved to Cochabamba, Bolivia, where he spent the early years of his childhood. His maternal family, the Llosas, were sustained by his grandfather, who managed a cotton farm.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 293: As a child, Vargas Llosa was led to believe that his father had died—his mother and her family did not want to explain that his parents had separated. During the government of Peruvian President José Bustamante y Rivero, Vargas Llosa's maternal grandfather obtained a diplomatic post in the northern Peruvian coastal city of Piura and the entire family returned to Peru.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 295: While in Piura, Vargas Llosa attended elementary school at the religious academy Colegio Salesiano. In 1946, at the age of ten, he moved to Lima and met his father for the first time. His parents re-established their relationship and lived in Magdalena del Mar, a middle-class Lima suburb, during his teenage years. While in Lima, he studied at the Colegio La Salle, a Christian middle school, from 1947 to 1949. Isä taisi olla aika limaska, eipä paljon muuta Markolle kuin limamälli.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 297: When Vargas Llosa was fourteen, his father sent him to the Leoncio Prado Military Academy in Lima. At the age of 16, before his graduation, Vargas Llosa began working as an amateur journalist for local newspapers. He withdrew from the military academy and finished his studies in Piura, where he worked for the local newspaper, La Industria, and witnessed the theatrical performance of his first dramatic work, La huida del Inca.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 299: In 1953, during the government of Manuel A. Odría, Vargas Llosa enrolled in Lima's National University of San Marcos, to study law and literature. He married Julia Urquidi, his maternal uncle's sister-in-law, in 1955 at the age of 19; she was 10 years older.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 303: Vargas Llosa began his literary career in earnest in 1957 with the publication of his first short stories, "The Leaders" ("Los jefes") and "The Grandfather" ("El abuelo"), while working for two Peruvian newspapers. Upon his graduation from the National University of San Marcos in 1958, he received a scholarship to study at the Complutense University of Madrid in Spain. In 1960, after his scholarship in Madrid had expired, Vargas Llosa moved to France under the impression that he would receive a scholarship to study there; however, upon arriving in Paris, he learned that his scholarship request was denied. Despite Mario and Julia's unexpected financial status, the couple decided to remain in Paris where he began to write prolifically. Their marriage lasted only a few more years, ending in divorce in 1964. A year later, Vargas Llosa married his first cousin, Patricia Llosa, with whom he had three children: Álvaro (born 1966), a writer and editor; Gonzalo (born 1967), an international civil servant; and Fata Morgana (born 1974), a pornographer.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 308: Sillä on ollut 2 lähisukulaista vaimoa: puuma, serkku, ja nyzillä on domestic
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 311: His novels include comedies, murder mysteries, historical novels, and political thrillers. And pornography.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 328: García Márquez vietti lapsuutensa äidin vanhempien kartanossa. Hänen sukulaistensa joukossa oli mielikuvituksellisia tarinankertojia, jotka kertoivat historiasta, ihmeellisistä tapahtumista ja legendoista.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 349: Romanen visar den bristande anpassningen som uppstår till följd av något oreparerbart, den fysiska kastreringen. Denna kastrering får symbolisera bristen på machismo hos personen Pichula Cuéllar, en egenskap som kännetecknar det samhälle som skildras. Men Cuellar avvisar dock aldrig denna machismo, utan försöker att anpassa sig till den, fast han vet att han inte kan. Cuellar accepterar inte situationen och upprätthåller en fullständig tystnad om problemet. Han försöker att följa gruppens normer som han dock aldrig kommer att kunna följa på grund av sin kastrering.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 385: Simone de Beauvoir, who Sartre playfully referred to as “The Beaver,” never published a piece of writing without her partner’s input until after his death. Likewise, he referred to her as a “filter” for his books, and some scholars have even made the case that she wrote some of them for him.
    xxx/ellauri116.html on line 389: Take, for example, 16-year-old Bianca Bienenfeld, a student of de Beauvoir’s who was 14 years her junior. Soon after the two women began their affair, de Beauvoir introduced her lover to Sartre. He promptly made it his mission to seduce Bienenfeld. After a romantic entanglement between the three of them, de Beauvoir told Sartre to end it, which he abruptly did in a letter.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 35: Novelist Bulwer-Lytton was a friend and contemporary of Charles Dickens and was one of the pioneers of the historical novel, exemplified by his most popular work, The Last Days of Pompeii. He is best remembered today for the opening line to the novel Paul Clifford, which begins "It was a dark and stormy night..." and is considered by some to be the worst opening sentence in the English language. However, Bulwer-Lytton is also responsible for well-known sayings such as "The penis mightier than the sword" from his play Richelieu. Despite being a very popular author with 19th-century readers, few people today are even aware of his prodigious body of literature spanning many genres. In the 21st century he is known best as the namesake for the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest (BLFC), sponsored annually by the English Department at San Jose State University, which challenges entrants "to compose the opening sentence to the worst of all possible novels", and the township of Lytton, or Camchin until the British nosey parkers came, saw and beat the copper-colored nlaka'pamuxes. Now their village got burned to ashes thanx to the industrial revolution.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 59: The prefect was so angry that he had a great gridiron prepared with hot coals beneath it, and had Lawrence placed on it, hence Lawrence's association with the gridiron. After the martyr had suffered pain for a long time, the legend concludes, he cheerfully declared: "I'm well done on this side. Turn me over!" From this St. Lawrence derives his patronage of cooks, chefs, and comedians.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 64: No, Freud was rong! Many basic tenets of Freud’s theory have been completely disproved. To name several: Psychosexual stages. The Oedipal complex. Belief that repressed memories from the first year of life can be unearthed. Sexual fantasy about intercourse with a parent is responsible for hysteria. Even more damning, his methods and procedures cannot be called scientific, his evidence lacks scientific credibility, and what is offered as evidence was sometimes fudged, if not outright fabricated. Not surprisingly, Freud is absented from contemporary psychological pedagogy, theory, and research. Claiming, “Freud is right!” is akin to shouting, “Long live the king!”; historical curiosities, both.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 70: Edward Bernays was the nephew of Freud. His mother was Freud’s sister and his father was Freud’s wife’s brother. Born in 1891, and brought to the United States with his family in the first year of his life, Bernays injected his uncle’s insights into the very marrow and bloodstream of American culture, altering its pulse and functioning—along with the rest of the world. He did so using the unique means and methods of American culture to achieve its most valued end: Cash. Life magazine named Bernays one of the 100 most influential Americans of the 20th century.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 72: Reason is a weak voice, easily overwhelmed by our desires, or employed, along with various other means, as a defense to protect us from awareness of the real, base motives that drive our thoughts and actions. This is Freud’s foundational vision of the human psyche. It is unflattering, if not repugnant, and basically Wright.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 74: Edward Bernays made his fortune, fame, and lasting influence by convincing people to buy things they don’t need, selling harmful products parading as health and beauty, rousing individuals to eagerly embrace slogans, and compelling them to surrender their individuality to the passions of the herd. He is considered to be the progenitor of public relations and is called “The Father of Spin”. He published a seminal book, Propaganda, that became Joseph Goebbels’ guidebook for his many Nazi propaganda campaigns, including developing the Fuhrer cult and orchestrating the genocide against the Jews.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 76: Bernays became a highly sought, and extravagantly paid consultant to a number of leading businesses. His many successes include helping the American Tobacco Company to sell cigarettes to women, advertising them as glamorous “torches of freedom”; and aiding the United Fruit Company to sell bananas, and when the newly elected president of Guatemala threatened the business interests of United Fruit, Bernays persuaded the CIA and the US government—through rumors, innuendos, and manipulation of the press about a growing Communist menace—to overthrow the his government.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 78: After World War II, Bernays rebranded “propaganda”, calling it “public relations”, giving it a more favorable spin. However labeled, his intent remained the same:
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 80: The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, and our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of…It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind. (Lähde: Bernays; Propaganda)
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 82: This is a worldwide phenomenon. We are a mob. Or mobs. Twittering, tweeting, Facebooking, “liking”, chattering, texting, Instagramming, Photo-shopping, rumoring, instigating, provoking, inciting, lying, messaging, massaging, insisting, imploring; “truths” swirling in clouds blanketing the globe, marketed, managed and mined for profit—political, economic or otherwise.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 114: All the pages it has added to our history books?
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 145:
    Fig. 1. This Woman Stopped Removing Facial Hair For A Year, Here’s How it Changed Her Face

    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 148: / ˌ d ɪ s i ɑːr k ə s  ... m ɪ s æ n ə /   ; Greek : Δικαίαρχος Dikaiarkhos ; c.  350 - n.  285 BC ), kirjoitetaan myös Dicearchus tai Dicearch ( / d ɪ s i ɑːr k / ), oli kreikkalainen filosofi, kartografi, maantieteilijä, matemaatikko ja kirjailija. Dicaearchus oli Aristoteleen opiskelija lyseossa. Hyvin vähän hänen työstään on säilynyt. Hän kirjoitti historiaa ja maantiedettä sekä Kreikassa , joista hänen tärkein työ oli hänen elämä Kreikka. Hän antoi merkittävän panoksen kartografian kentälle , jossa hän käytti ensimmäisten joukossa maantieteellisiä koordinaatteja. Hän kirjoitti myös kirjoja filosofiasta ja politiikasta . Elämä Hän oli poika yhden Pheidias, ja syntynyt Mes- on Sisiliassa , vaikka hän läpäisi suurimman osan elämästään Kreikassa, ja erityisesti Peloponnesoksen. Hän oli Aristoteleen opetuslapsi ja Theophrastuksen ystävä, jolle hän omisti joitain kirjoituksiaan. Hän kuoli noin 285 eaa. Dicaearchus - https://fi.xcv.wiki/wiki/Dicaearchus.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 212: Kesäkuussa 2021 eduskunnan kansliatoimikunta esitti Yli-Viikarin erottamista virastaan. Esityksen todettiin olevan historiallinen, sillä eduskunta ei ole aiemmin puuttunut vastaavalla tavalla riippumattoman viraston ylimmän johdon toimiin. Kansliatoimikunnan mukaan "luottamus Tytti Yli-Viikarin edellytyksiin ja kykyyn toimia Valtiontalouden tarkastusviraston pääjohtajana on kokonaisuutena arvioiden hänen toimintansa johdosta romahtanut." Eduskunnan puhemies Anu Vehviläinen kertoi muun muassa, että ylipääjohtaja ei voi väistää omaa vastuutaan vierittämällä sitä alaisilleen.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 225: As Hester looks out over the crowd, she notices a small, misshapen man and recognizes him as her long-lost husband, who has been presumed lost at sea. When the husband sees Hester's shame, he asks a man in the crowd about her and is told the story of his wife's adultery. He angrily exclaims that the child's father, the partner in the adulterous act, should also be punished and vows to find the man. He chooses a new name, Roger Chillingworth, to aid him in his plan.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 227: The Reverend John Wilson and the minister of Hester's church, Arthur Dimmesdale, question her, but she refuses to name her lover. After she returns to her prison cell, the jailer brings in Chillingworth, now a physician, to calm Hester and her child with his roots and herbs. He and Hester have an open conversation regarding their marriage and the fact that they were both in the wrong. Her lover, however, is another matter and he demands to know who it is; Hester refuses to divulge such information. He accepts this, stating that he will find out anyway, and forces her to conceal that he is her husband. If she ever reveals him, he warns her, he will destroy the child's father. Hester agrees to Chillingworth's terms although she suspects she will regret it.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 233: Because Dimmesdale's health has begun to fail, the townspeople are happy to have Chillingworth, the newly arrived physician, take up lodgings with their beloved minister. Being in such close contact with Dimmesdale, Chillingworth begins to suspect that the minister's illness is the result of some unconfessed guilt. He applies psychological pressure to the minister because he suspects Dimmesdale is Pearl's father. One evening, pulling the sleeping Dimmesdale's vestment aside, Chillingworth sees a symbol that represents his shame on the minister's pale chest.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 235: Tormented by his guilty conscience, Dimmesdale goes to the square where Hester was punished years earlier. Climbing the scaffold in the dead of night, he admits his guilt but cannot find the courage to do so publicly in the light of day. Hester, shocked by Dimmesdale's deterioration, decides to obtain a release from her vow of silence to her husband.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 237: Several days later, Hester meets Dimmesdale in the forest and tells him of her husband and his desire for revenge. She convinces Dimmesdale to leave Boston in secret on a ship to Europe where they can start life anew. Inspired by this plan, the minister seems to gain new energy. On Election Day, Dimmesdale gives one of his most inspired sermons. But as the procession leaves the church, Dimmesdale climbs upon the scaffold and confesses his sin, dying in Hester's arms. Later, most witnesses swear that they saw a stigma in the form of a scarlet "A" upon his chest, although some deny this statement. Chillingworth, losing his will for revenge, dies shortly thereafter and leaves Pearl a substantial inheritance.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 295: Vähän kauhistutti toi kolmenkympin kriisin,
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 347: Anna ojensi vaan nilkkaa ja otti Inga-Lillin kaakusta päältä tähettä. Joku oli näpsinyt siitä pehmopornokuvia joista Anna oli ize koonnut albumin ja kexinyt heruttavia kuvatextejä. Aika narsistista touhua. Anna on moniosaaja. Kikka kaatoi siivotessa koko pakan päälle käsidesiä. Musteesta tuli toimestani lähtemätön tippavana huijarimuijan kyökin lattialle. Ei ois kannattanut pezkujen pihistellä ja jättää palkkaamatta siivooja. Taina siivoo kyllä halvalla mutta vastuukysymyxet käyvät kalliixi.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 353: In Petronius's Satyricon, Trimalchus (pro Trimalchio) finds her shriveled to a tiny lump and kept alive in a jar. He asks her, "Sibyl, what do you want?" (in Greek, Σίβυλλα τί θέλεις; pronounced more or less "Sibylla, ti theleis"). She replies, "I want to die" (in Greek, ἀποθανεῖν θέλω, pronounced "apothanein thelo"). I learned this, as you did, not from reading the Satyricon, but from beating T S Eliot's The Waste Land to death in my English Lit class.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 357:
    Thought Experiment: What is this text?

    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 359: "Nam Sibyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla pendere, et cum illi pueri dicerent: Sibylla ti theleis; respondebat illa: apothanein thelo." I. THE BURIAL OF THE DEAD April is the cruellest month, breeding Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing Memory and desire, stirring Dull roots with spring rain. Winter kept us warm, covering Earth in forgetful snow, feeding A little life with dried tubers. Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade, And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten, 10 And drank coffee, and talked for an hour. Bin gar keine Russin, stamm’ aus Litauen, echt deutsch. And when we were children, staying at the archduke’s, My cousin’s, he took me out on a sled, And I was frightened. He said, Marie, Marie, hold on tight. And down we went. In the mountains, there you feel free. I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter. What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, 20 You cannot say, or guess, for you know only A heap of broken images, where the sun beats, And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief, And the dry stone no sound of water. Only There is shadow under this red rock, (Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust. 30 Frisch weht der Wind Der Heimat zu Mein Irisch Kind, Wo weilest du? "You gave me hyacinths first a year ago; "They called me the hyacinth girl." - Yet when we came back, late, from the Hyacinth garden, Your arms full, and your hair wet, I could not Speak, and my eyes failed, I was neither Living nor dead, and I knew nothing, 40 Looking into the heart of light, the silence. Öd’ und leer das Meer.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 404: Tapiovaara ehti muutamassa vuodessa ohjata viisi elokuvaa, joista viimeinen jäi häneltä kesken. Tunnetuin hänen elokuvistaan on Varastettu kuolema. Se perustuu Runar Schildtin novelliin ”Lihamylly” ja kuvaa vastarintatoimintaa tsaarinaikaisen Venäjän sortovaltaa vastaan vuoden 1905 Suomessa. Monet elokuvan tyylittelevät otokset ovat nousseet suomalaisen elokuvahistorian klassikoiksi. Kokeilevan ranskalaisen elokuvan vaikutteet ovat ilmeiset. Tapiovaara oli julkivasemmistolainen, mikä oli 1930-luvulla harvinaista. Hän osallistui aktiivisesti muun muassa kulttuurijärjestö Kiilan toimintaan.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 408: Nuorena Nyrki Tapiovaara oli urheilullinen. Vanhemman veljensä, Kaarlo Tapion eli Tapio Tapiovaaran, kanssa hän harrasti myös kirjallisuutta ja historiaa. Veljekset esiintyivät koulussa tulenkantajina ja vetivät koulun ateistikerhoa. Poikien huoneesta ja heidän ”kellarikerhostaan” kehkeytyi Hämeenlinnan älykkönuorison kohtauspaikka. Nyrki Tapiovaaran nuorempi veli Ilmari Tapiovaara oli tunnettu muotoilija ja sisustussuunnittelija. Kristina-tädillä on kodissa sen vihreitä kiekuroita tuoleja, isiltä ja äidiltä perittyjä. Nyrki Tapiovaara oli kuitenkin liian nuori ehtiäkseen Tulenkantajien kiihkeimpään hurmiovaiheeseen 1920-luvulla.
    xxx/ellauri120.html on line 424: 28. helmikuuta pataljoona lähetti komppanian vahvuisen osaston partioretkelle Korpijärven kylään Suojärven kunnassa. Vänrikki Tapiovaaralla oli komennossaan kaksi joukkuetta, joiden oli määrä vallata Etelä-Korpijärven kylä. Osasto yllätettiin selustasta (tietysti), ja se joutui perääntymään. 29. helmikuuta eli karkauspäivänä Tapiovaara teki voimakkaan vastahyökkäyksen, mutta päätyi antamaan osastolleen vetäytymiskäskyn. (Tuttua.) Johtajan tapaan hän oli viimeinen vetäytymässä, ja hän tulitti vihollista miestensä vetäytyessä. Eräs miehistä näki Tapiovaaraan osuvan ja tämän tuupertuvan hankeen. Silminnäkijöiden mukaan hän kohosi vielä kerran ja ampui pitkän sarjan viholliseen. Tämän jälkeen kukaan ei osannut kertoa mitään varmaa, jolloin ilmeisesti syntyi olettamus Tapiovaaran katoamisesta tai vangiksi joutumisesta. Olettamus ei kuitenkaan osoittautunut todeksi. Sarrrrja! Sarrrja! Laukaus Laukaus! Nyrki kuoli kuten elikin.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 116: Varhaiskasvatusikäiset ovat osaavia ajattelijoita. Oppimista tapahtuu myös suunniteltujen tuokioiden ulkopuolella. Monenlaisia pienempiä arvoneuvotteluja tulee kaikkialla vastaan. Joku iso eskariköriläs joka jo ajaa partaansa vaatii sun leikkiautoa. Paras totella. Näiden kautta lapsi paikantaa, jäsentää ja rakentaa merkityxiä izestään ja toisista, elämästä ja kuolemasta, hyvästä ja pahasta, sekä paikastaan niin hiekkalaatikolla kuin hiekanjyväsenä universumissa. Hissun kissun hissun kissun sanoo pappi jakaessaan ehtoollista. Valituissa paloissa neekerityttö Cindy puhui kauniisti irkkusyntyisestä opestaan, joka oli suonut sille identiteettiturvallisuuden tunnetta ja pedagogista rakkautta. Yhtään hypelöimättä. Identiteettiturvallisuus kytkeytyy vahvasti myönteiseen minäkuvaan. Irkkuope sai Cindyn tuntemaan izensä eteväxi ja arvokkaaxi. Vähemmistökontextista tulevat lapset tarvii sitä. Sixi on tärkeää että eskarissa on mustia nukkeja jotka syö käsillä.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 128: Lévinasin miälestä se mistä kaikki lähtee liikkeelle, on etiikka, ei metafysiikka, kuten aristotelisessa perinteessä on esitetty. Tämä ei kuitenkaan tarkoita etiikkaa tavanomaisessa merkityksessä, jossa pyritään oikeuttamaan tietyt teot. Filosofian historiaa on Lévinasin mukaan hallinnut pyrkimys totaliteettiin ja hallintaan, jossa tietty "samuus" hallitsee kaikkea jättämättä ulkopuolelle mitään. Tämän murtamiseksi on löydettävä tapa tarkastella suhdetta toiseen tavalla, jossa toinen säilyttää erilaisuutensa. Peruskysymys on, miten minun olemassaoloni oikeuttaa itsensä ja asemansa toisiin nähden. Vastaus tähän saavutetaan toteamalla toisten yhteismitattomuus itseen nähden.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 152: Toivo Kuula oli Markku Marttisen isoisä. Juhani Heikan isoisä puolestaan oli jääkäriluutnantti Pietari ”Pekka” Heikka, joka oli yksi Toivo Kuulan surmaajaksi epäillyistä miehistä.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 195: Aloitteen tapaamisesta on tehnyt Juhani Heikka. Hän on kuullut isoisänsä tarinan jo lukioikäisenä. Historiasta kiinnostuneena Heikka on lukenut aiheesta runsaasti: Toivo Kuulan elämäkertoja, sisällissodan historiaa sekä surmatyöstä kertovia lehtijuttuja. Helmikuussa hän vietti päivän Kansallisarkistossa ja kävi läpi pari sataa sivua kuulustelupöytäkirjoja, joissa surmaillan tapahtumia selvitettiin perinpohjaisesti.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 233: MARKKU Marttisen suvussa Toivo Kuulan kohtalosta on puhuttu paljon. Marttinen on lukenut histo­riaa ahkerasti ja tuntee sisällissodan vaiheet ja isoisän tarinan. Isoäiti, Toivo Kuulan vaimo Alma, murtui tapauksen jälkeen täysin.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 287: Vanhemmistaan Atwood huomauttaa: "They weren't very actively encouraging; I think their theory was to leave kids alone... I call that encouraging. The idea of parents hovering over you the whole time, making you take lessons and occupying every minute of your time, I think is probably quite bad, because it means the child has no room to invent. I did have this older brother who was very instructive, who liked passing on to me whatever information he'd acquired; it meant we didn't play dollies a lot; we'd line up our - few, I'd have to say, because it was the war, you know - our few stuffed animals and then we'd have the Battle of Waterloo."
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 289: Peggy kävi kotikoulua. Sen vanhemmat pakkas sen selkäreppuun lähtiessään mezään hyönteisjahtiin. Perhosten nappaajat. She only attended full-time school at eight, in Toronto. Readers of Cat's Eye (1988), a chilling account of the lasting damage of childhood bullying, might expect that these years were problematic, but apart from a fleeting reference to "a horrific Grade 4 teacher" there is no suggestion that Atwood was especially unhappy, though she did recently write that "I was now faced with real life, in the form of other little girls - their prudery and snobbery, their Byzantine social life based on whispering and vicious gossip, and an inability to pick up earthworms without wriggling all over and making mewing noises like a kitten". Mä koitin opettaa Helmiä olemaan inhoomatta matoja 2-vuotiaana. Inhoo se niitä kuitenkin vaikkon biologi. Ja Seija ei voi sietää käärmeitä, se näkee kuumina öinä niistä unia. KKK-äijät marssi kadulla 20-luvulla kuin kihomadot. Niitä kiemurteli valkoisina ruskeiden kiekuroiden kimpussa kakkapotassa kun oltiin pieniä.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 306: Atwood’s career as a graduate student stretched, with many interruptions, for half a dozen years. During that period she had an affair with Quebec poet D. G. Jones— which Sullivan mentions so obliquely that it is over before the reader realizes it has begun. She had broken it off, as a result of the stresses caused by his workload. She subsequently courted Jim Polk (an American writer she had met at Harvard) and, in January 1967, she decided to marry him "after five years of equivocation". She also worked at odd jobs including market researcher like Fred Waterford, and despite never finishing her PhD, began a university teaching career that would take her to cities across Canada. At 27, she became the youngest person to ever win the Governor General’s Award with her 1967 poetry collection, The Circle Game. Siitä nousi sille aika lailla kusi päähän.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 311: Graeme Gibson, long-time partner to author Margaret Atwood and father of their only child, Jess, died in London, England earlier this week while he was accompanying Ms Atwood on an extensive book tour to promote her latest novel, The Testaments, a sequel to the massively successful The Handmaid’s Tail. He was 84 and his death was both expected and sudden.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 312: He too was an author of novels, none of which ever came close to having the kind of success Ms Atwood has always enjoyed, but Gibson himself would have said his greatest success was the support he gave his partner during one of the most amazing careers any writer has ever had, in Canada or in any country. His support was unstinting and inspiring, and allied to it was a conviction that Atwood’s greatness demanded that kind of commitment.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 316: But back to young Peggy. As a result of the governor's award, The Edible Woman was published. Atwood began to enjoy a growing reputation; nonetheless, while her own career took off, she still devoted considerable amounts of time to a small radical publishing house, Anansi, in which her first and only husband was deeply involved. Over this period, Atwood and Jim Polk drifted apart, and Atwood began a relationship with the novelist Graeme Gibson. Together with Graeme's two teenage sons, Matt and Grae, they went off to a farm in a small agricultural community in 1973 in Alliston.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 334: In her admiring new biography of Margaret Atwood, Rosemary Sullivan passes on a story about the writer that vividly catches her youthful ambition. One day when she was in her mid-20s, she dropped in at the home of poet John Newlove, who had been drinking heavily with his friend fellow Prairie writer Patrick Lane. The men’s conversation about literature had degenerated into a series of long silences punctuated by the occasional pseudoprofound utterance. Frustrated, Atwood cut to the heart of the matter, demanding to know what their poetic ambitions were. After some drunken dithering, the two declared that what they wanted most was to win a Governor General’s Award. As Lane recalled later, Atwood was indignant at their modest expectations, declaring tartly that the only goal worth pursuing was the Nobel Prize. Swigging down her beer, she then left the room.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 336: Atwood has not won the Nobel (this was written 1998), at least not yet. But the petite 58-year-old novelist (Cat’s Eye, Alias Grace) and poet (Power Politics, Morning in the Burned House) has become internationally famous on a scale no Canadian writer of serious literature ever has. She is, in her own words, “one of the few literary writers who has gotten lucky”—which means she is read not just by intellectuals, but by hairdressers, chartered accountants and farmers. Easy reading, straightforward sentiments.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 345: Sullivan relates how in 1969, when Atwood was giving her first poetry reading, poet Irving Layton futilely attempted to sabotage the upstart writer by simultaneously reading his own work from the audience. Lisää ainesta käsineitokeitoxeen.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 365: Gileadin tapahtumat melkein toteutui kun Trump keräs kannattajat Capitolin kukkulalle rähisemään. Kysehän oli patriarkaalisfundamentalistisesta vallankaappauxesta, jossa äärisetämiehet veti maton alta hameväeltä.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 367: Komentaja on Junesta siitä mukava että se ei ole naisvihamielinen kuten jopa Luke. Se on pikemminkin niinkuin iskä hyönteishemuli. Kun Peggy kunnostautuu ritiratissa sanalla zeugiitti eli ateenalainen iesmies komentaja on suorastaan iloinen, ja Peggy on läpeensä tyytyväinen. Peg pitää vanhemmista miehistä. Leffan luikero Fred (1970) ei oikein täytä roolia, parrasta huolimatta se näyttää melkein nuoremmalta kuin June (1982). Jatko-osien Joosepin näyttelijä on enempi kuin kirjan Fred. Hassua että Fredin nimi on oikeasti Jooseppi! Joseph is the younger brother of Harry Potter. Speaking to The Guardian about becoming a parent in 2016, Joseph said: "Becoming a parent has made me more aware of the role my parents played in my life, in all our lives." Jäätävää. Onko Peggy lapsivihamielinen, välillä se kuulostaa aika kylmältä.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 369: "Vihaan lapsia. Ne ovat niin inhimillisiä, tuovat mieleen apinat. SAKI". Whodat? Munro, skotl. lehtimies ja kirjailija. Hector Hugh Munro (18 December 1870 – 14 November 1916), better known by the pen name Saki and also frequently as H. H. Munro, was a British writer whose witty, mischievous and sometimes macabre stories satirize Edwardian society and culture. After his wife's death Charles Munro sent his children, including two-year-old Hector, home to England. The children were sent to Broadgate Villa, in Pilton near Barnstaple, North Devon, to be raised by their grandmother and paternal maiden aunts, Charlotte and Augusta, in a strict and puritanical household. A war fanatic, he was killed by a German sniper. According to several sources, his last words were "Put that bloody cigarette out!" Munro was homosexual at a time when in Britain sexual activity between men was a crime. (Mä ARRVASIN! Sen se oli näkönenkin.)
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 378: Having a fetish doesn’t necessarily mean wanting to wear adult diapers or a furry costume. (Turrit on rivoja sexifetishistejä.) You just have to find a normally non-sexual object or action arousing—an association you probably formed in childhood, says Samantha Leigh Allen, professor of sexual fetishism at Emory University. Maybe your mother had platform shoes, ankle shackles, net stockings, cat spectacles, bikini, and a print hat. Maybe she talked like a slut and moaned all the time.

    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 381: Shoe fetishism, foot fetishism, butt fetishism, bondage, voyeurism.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 395: Nyt on niillä Anni finaalissa ja vizit vähissä. Ennen finaalia ne törkeilivät entisvanhaan tyyliinsä. Englanti juhli, mutta muualla maailmassa paheksuttiin Englannin käytöstä. Schmeichelia häirittiin rangaistuspotkun aikana laservalolla. Lisäksi englantilaiset buuasivat Tanskan kansallishymnin aikana.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 454: As we get ready for Prayerfest each year, we prepare our hearts by taking a 40-Day Prayer Journey. We invite you to join us during this time of prayer and fasting as you prepare for YOUR miracle. To access your copy of the following free resources from our Lead Pastor, Dr. David Ireland, simply click the button below! Yea, that little one, between your legs!
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 472: Prayerfest is a one-day festival of prayer. In an atmosphere of passionate worship, fervent praying and powerful preaching, unique expressions of the Holy Spirit are displayed that lead to an encounter with God. Over a six-week period, hundreds of people prepare themselves to meet with God at Prayerfest. God responds to the desperate cries and passionate prayers of His people on a first come-first serve basis for a holy visitation—by invading their lives with His power and glory. Here are some ways to help you prepare for this special day:
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 478: -Expect the essence of God to descend at the event! Expect to receive major breakthroughs in your life. -Except to give big hands and handouts to the Lead Pastor and his flock. -Expect to kneel in front of us dressed in just your own comfort and feel a powerful presence enter inside you like Penrod. I mean Nimrod. In fact Meatrod.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 516: Sine īrā et studiō is a Latin term meaning "without anger and passion". It was coined by Roman historian Tacitus in the introduction to his Annals 1.1., which can be translated as follows:
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 518: The histories of Tiberius, Gaius, Claudius, and Nero, while they were in power, were falsified through terror, and after their death were written under the irritation of a recent hatred. Hence my purpose is to relate a few facts about Augustus - more particularly his last acts, then the reign of Tiberius, and all which follows, without either bitterness or partiality, from any motives to which I am far removed.
    xxx/ellauri121.html on line 540: Ranskassa se tapasi Le Guinin joka oli historioitsija. Don Huonosta tuli Portland State Universityn historian lehtori. Ne saivat 3 lasta eivätkä lähteneet enää Oregonista, paizi fantasian siivillä. Peggy piti puheen sen arkulla Oregonissa. Molemmat on pohjoisesta mutta Portland on lännessä ja Toronto idässä. Portland tunnetaan parhaiten sementistä ja Toronto vaahteranlehdistä.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 170: The mechanisms underlying the benefits of Mindfulness Based Interventions are suggested to include improved emotional regulation strategies and self-compassion levels, decreased rumination and experiential avoidance [3], as well as improved meta-cognitive skills and body awareness [4,5]. A number of authors have suggested models to explain the psychological mechanisms by which mindfulness interventions have an effect [6,7,8], and Hötzel et al. [9] have proposed a theoretical framework that integrates earlier models. This framework proposes that there are four main mechanisms: (1) attention regulation; (2) body awareness; (3) emotion regulation; and (4) change in perspective of the self; these, therefore, together improve self-regulation [9].
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 186: Don't forget to practise what you've learned with the activity further down this page. Listen to some examples of dialogues featuring sarcastic remarks
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 187: [an error occurred while processing this directive].
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 189: Remember to judge when and with whom to be sarcastic - you can offend people with inappropriate use of this language. People with a frontal lobe dementia have a hard time recognizing sarcasm.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 204: Watch the language of sarcasm. There are no fixed rules about what language to use when being sarcastic, but the following features are quite common (but this language is used when people aren't being sarcastic too!):
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 210: You can use this to disagree or argue with someone by seeming to agree:
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 222: Make it clear that you are being sarcastic! It's really important that your conversation partner realises that you are being sarcastic. Here are a couple of ways of doing this:
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 242: If you want to be sarcastic in writing (for example in an email), try putting an exclamation mark in brackets after your sarcastic comment, like this:
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 273: kommentoija kauhisteli.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 363: Die Oberlausitz, oberlausitzisch: Äberlausitz, obersorbisch Hornja Łužica (niedersorbisch Górna Łužyca, tschechisch Horní Lužice, polnisch Łużyce Górne, schlesisch Aeberlausitz), ist eine ursprünglich politisch eigenständige Region, die heute zu etwa 67 % zu Sachsen sowie 30 % zu Polen und 3 % zu Brandenburg gehört. In Sachsen umfasst die Oberlausitz in etwa die Landkreise Görlitz und Bautzen mit einer nördlichen Grenze zwischen Hoyerswerda und Lauta und in Brandenburg den südlichen Teil des Landkreises Oberspreewald-Lausitz um die Stadt Ruhland sowie einige Orte östlich und südlich davon. Der seit 1945 polnische Teil der Oberlausitz zwischen den Flüssen Queis im Osten und der Lausitzer Neiße im Westen gehört administrativ zur Woiwodschaft Niederschlesien (polnisch Dolnośląskie); nur ein kleiner Zipfel um Łęknica (Lugknitz) gehört zusammen mit dem polnischen Teil der Niederlausitz zur Woiwodschaft Lebus. Im Süden entspricht die Grenze der Oberlausitz der sächsisch-tschechischen Grenze von Steinigtwolmsdorf im Westen bis nach Zittau und östlich davon der polnisch-tschechischen Grenze bis zur Tafelfichte.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 379: Trotz der Lage des heutigen Dialektgebiets im Freistaat Sachsen zählt die Oberlausitzer Mundart nicht zur obersächsischen Dialektgruppe, sondern reiht sich eher in die Kette der sächsischen Bergdialekte wie z. B. dem Erzgebirgischen ein, besonders ist eine Nähe zum osterzgebirgischen Dialekt erkennbar. Eine größere historische Nähe existiert allerdings zu den früher weiter östlich und südlich von den Deutschen in Böhmen gesprochenen Dialekten, dem Nordböhmischen und Gebirgsschlesischen bzw. Schlesischen. Man kann die Mundart so im weitesten Sinne auch als einen der wenigen verbliebenen Sudetendialekte bezeichnen. Eine gewisse Ähnlichkeit zu den obersächsischen Dialekten ist jedoch durchaus vorhanden, insbesondere im Bereich der Vokalverschiebungen.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 440: Cunnerschdurfer Schissn
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 468: Gierschdurfer Schissn
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 761: Hardly any Europeans would have even the vaguest idea how many people there are in “Western Europe”, since that is no longer a useful category. They would, however, know that the EU has a population of 450 million, and this is a useful category to have in your head, since it forms a trading bloc.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 770: Some books stay with you for a lifetime, the rest you just blithely walk by on your way to watching tv or cat videos or fling into garbage without so much as looking at the cover. Initially, they may seem to be just stories. As you will find, however, the literature grows and stays with you; they stay with you until you realise their true value: their capacity to alter and re-alter your idea of yourself, others, the society, and the world. Naah, the books on this list help you stay the way you are, keeping all your good old all American prejudices.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 772: Business Insider has compiled a list of 25 such classics, drawn from Amazon’s list of 100 lifetime books, Goodreads recommendations, and the opinions of the editors. A common trend among these books is their exploration of politics, history, and human conditions - insights which allow these literature to withstand the test of time. Here’s the list:
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 777: His book is where the idea of Big Brother originated, and his messages of a restrictive government remain as insightful today as they did when they were originally written more than 60 years ago. Orwell presents readers with a vision of a haunting world that remains captivating from the beginning to end. Good sturdy Rifle Association stuff. Orwell eli Blair on reposteltu täällä.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 782: Huxley's enthralling tale takes readers through a frightening and thought-provoking take on society. This one should vaccinate you against communism for life.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 787: Left tormented and in isolation, the innocent creature turns on his creator in this eloquent Gothic thriller, which touches the hearts of readers with its messages of the dangers of science and human judgment. This helps appreciate pro life ideas: do not meddle with what belongs to Mighty Mouse territory.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 792: While Kafka had intended for the story to be burned after his death, his friend Max Brod pressed forward to prepare it for publication. Franz was right. The two met as teenagers, following a talk Brod gave about Arthur Schopenhauer at a students’ Union Club on Prague’s Ferdinandstrasse. One of their first conversations concerned Nietzsche’s attack on Schopenhauer’s renouncement of the self. Pretty quickly the two curious minds became inseparable, usually meeting twice daily to discuss life, literature, philosophy, and whatever other topics might randomly arise. Like sex...
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 796: In their early 20s the pair vacationed together on Lake Garda on the Austrian-Italian border; they paid their respects at Goethe’s house in Weimar; stayed together at the Hotel Belvedere au Lac in Lugano, Switzerland; and even visited brothels together in Prague, Milan, Leipzig, and Paris. Brod, a self-confessed ladies’ man with an insatiable appetite for adventurous sexual conquests, often berated Kafka for not having a similarly urgent drive of eros. “You avoid women and try to live without them,” Brod once told his friend.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 807: O'Brien uses plenty of metaphors to weave together a profound study of men at war, inspired by his experiences in the Vietnam War from 1969 to 1970.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 813: The book weaves through the phases of Pilgrim's life, displaying his and Vonnegut's heartbreaking experiences as an American prisoner of war.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 822: 'A Confederacy of Dunces' was written 11 years after Toole committed suicide. Ignatius O'Reilly is a 30-year-old man living with his mother in New Orleans, who comes into contact with many French Quarter characters while searching for employment. Though comical, there is a deep streak of melancholy that runs through Reilly's character, and Toole's ability to combine these two aspects beautifully won him the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1981. The moral (as usual): everybody is the Steven of his or her own life. A complete turd. Supposedly funny. Parochial baloney.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 826: History who still lives with his mother. He lives in utter
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 829: strings for his lute, he gets into an argument with a
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 832: a communist, arresting a nearby retiree named Claude. This
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 834: meets Ignatius after shopping. Ignatius and his mother go
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 835: to a bar so his mother can drink. She then drinks too much
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 839: many years in order to help his mother pay for the
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 844: you find the obsession of Ignatius with his wardrobe, his
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 845: verbally abusive attitude towards his mother, his habits of
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 851: with his only friend from college; the politically liberal
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 868: His desire leads him to riches he could have never imagined. A motivational account of how following one's dreams can lead to the discovery of great wonders, 'The Alchemist' is an enchanting read filled with wisdom. Now this is the pits! The only worse choice on the list than this braindead dago would have been the old Russian hag Ayn Rand.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 872: 'Tuesdays with Morrie' is the touching story about Mitch Albom and his mentor, Morrie Schwartz.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 873: Many of us might have lost track of our mentors, as Mitch did, with their insights slowly fading into memory. When Mitch gets a second chance to meet his mentor in the last few months of the man's life, he begins to visit him every Tuesday.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 874: The two rekindle their relationship as they discuss life lessons, which he finds will make a world of a difference in his own life. Another never heard, probably for a very good reason too.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 878: Wilde's philosophical novel was originally published as a serial story in the July 1890 issue of Lippincott's Monthly Magazine, but as editors feared the story was improper, they deleted five hundred words before its publication. They were just as uninteresting as the rest of this extra narcissistic gay snobbery.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 880: The story is the tale of a man who sells his soul for eternal youth and beauty. Though the book has caused scandals since its first appearance in 1890, it remains a powerful read today. Forgot to mention that Wilde was a jailbird, a convicted sex criminal.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 885: A frightening tale about good and evil and what it means to be free as humans, 'A Clockwork Orange' is told through the central character, Alex, who recounts his violent encounters with state authorities who are intent on reforming him.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 909: Along the way, his answer becomes that we pay too little attention to successful people's upbringing. He explains everything from the fascinating secrets of some of software's billionaires to the qualities that made the Beatles so iconic. This is sure to be a huge pile of shit, another stupid try to justify of the fucking "I am my own life's hero" philosophy.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 914: Ender suffers greatly from the isolation, rivalry, pressure, and fear that's present in this artificial community of young soldiers. Never even heard of this piece of shit. Sounds like the teenage girlie assassin series that had a honeysucking film based on it, Hunger Games. Insect like aliens, my foot. Termite like monkeys are much worse.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 918: Heller's classic tale centres around the loss of faith that comes with the rise of bureaucratic power. This book too is a pile of shit.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 919: Set in Italy during World War II, bombardier Yossarian is a hero under attack. As his army continues to increase, Yossarian finds himself in a bind.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 924: Alongside works by Kurt Vonnegut and Thomas Pynchon, Catch-22 opened the floodgates for a wave of crazy American fiction. The reviews of the book range from very positive to very negative. Although the novel won no awards upon release, it has remained in print and is seen as one of the most significant American novels of the 20th century. The novel examines the absurdity of war and military life through the experiences of Yossarian and his cohorts, who attempt to maintain their sanity while fulfilling their service requirements so that they may return home.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 948: 'Moonwalking with Einstein' recounts Foer's yearlong journey to improve his memory. He draws on cutting-edge research, cultural histories, and tricks from mentalists.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 954: Though a graphic novel, 'Watchmen' is considered by many to be the greatest graphic novel in history. It is more graphic than all the rest, faktiskt.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 959: A timeless tear-jerker, 'Flowers for Algernon' examines the treatment of mentally disabled individuals and how one's past can influence the future. Charles Gordon has an intellectual disability and is chosen to participate in an experiment that could help boost his intelligence, but has only been tried on animals so far. As he volunteers to be the first human subject early on, the effects of the experiment begin to show. Still, getting smarter comes with its own set of surprises.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 967: Great list. One detail: Kahneman won his Nobel prize long before the book. Besides, he was a sleazy customer, see here.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 984: ``The Holocaust is a national and historic trauma and a split over it could create an irrevocable rift in our people,″ Culture Minister Shulamit Aloni of the liberal Meretz party said.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 991: during this period are no exception. For example, while
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1025: Then there was Barbie; the bold doll who stood alone. She was successful, rich, mega-famous, and single. She was teaching America’s female youth that this too is what to expect out of life.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1033: Many mothers of today that were proud owners of Barbie might have thought twice before they wrapped her up to give to their three year old if they knew her history. Barbie originated in Germany by a man, named Aryan Nation. She was a direct copy of Klaus Barbie...
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1092: Capote was born Truman Streckfus Persons in New Orleans, Louisiana, on September 30, 1924. His father, Arch Persons, was a well-educated ne'er-do-well from a prominent Alabama family, and his mother, Lillie Mae Faulk, was a pretty and ambitious young woman so anxious to escape the confines of small-town Alabama that she married Arch in her late teens. Capote's early childhood with Arch and Lillie Mae was marked by neglect and painful insecurity that left him with a lifelong fear of abandonment. His life gained some stability in 1930 when, at age six, he was put in the care of four elderly, unmarried cousins in Monroeville, Monroe County. He lived there full-time for three years and made extended visits throughout the decade. Capote was most influenced by his cousin Sook, who adored him and whom he celebrated in his writings. He also forged what would become a lifelong friendship with next-door neighbor Nelle Harper Lee, who later won the Pulitzer Prize for her book, To Kill a Mockingbird. Capote appears in the novel as the character Dill.
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1105: historiallisen ympäristön vuoksi southern gothic
    xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1206: Lukyanova is starkly against having children herself. "The very idea of having children brings out this deep revulsion in me." "It's not what being classy is all about. It's not about men or kids."
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 40: histoire. ..Les gaz émanés d’elle
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 85: Efter börskraschen i New York 1929 började koncernen få problem. Kreugers död i Paris den 12 mars 1932 utlöste den så kallade Kreugerkraschen, som ledde till att holdingbolaget Kreuger & Toll AB och dotterbolaget International Match Corporation i USA försattes i konkurs. Sammanbrottet är en av historiens mest omfattande konkurser och fick långtgående politiska, personliga och ekonomiska konsekvenser i Sverige, USA och många andra länder runt om i världen.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 239: Cinnpie´s response comes after a prolonged silence on Twitter. She added a letter from her lawyers to her statement, a cease and desist to all the defamatory comments online. Creampie acknowledges that "I was an irresponsible, inappropriate, and immature 23 year old in 2016… and I deserve all of this. Sitä saa mitä tilaa. I may be a pussy pedophile, but I am not evil. I am not a crook. All I care ab is my favorite games & making my friends laugh." LOL
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 325: Kirjoituspöydän ja ruokailupöydän, molemmat liian isoja poikamiehelle. Vaikka en ihmisiä kylään kutsunutkaan, tunsin kuitenkin halua kihisevän pataruoan jakamiseen jonkun kanssa.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 372: Weinreb grew up in Scheveningen, Netherlands, to which his family had moved in 1916, and became notorious for selling a fictitious escape route for Jews from the occupied Netherlands in the Second World War. When his scheme fell apart in 1944, he left his home in Scheveningen and went into hiding in Ede. He was imprisoned for 3½ years after the war for fraud as well as collaboration with the German occupier. In his memoirs, published in 1969 he maintained that his plans were to give Jews hope for survival and that he had assumed that the liberation of the Netherlands would take place before his customers were deported. The debate about his guilt or innocence—called the “Weinreb affair”—was very heated in the Netherlands in the 1970s, involving noted writers like Renate Rubinstein and Willem Frederik Hermans. In an attempt to end this debate, the government asked the Rijksinstituut Oorlogsdocumentatie (Netherlands institute for war documentation) to investigate the matter. in 1976 the institute issued a report (of which a part already was leaked to the press in 1973), which determined that his memoirs were "a collection of lies and fantasies," and that his collaboration had caused 70 deaths. Although his activities did contribute to some Jews' survival, most Jews who fell for Weinreb's swindle were deported and killed.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 376: Even after his death in 1988 the discussion about Weinreb in the Netherlands has not come to an end. In a Dutch biography by Regina Grüter published in 1997, Een fantast schrijft geschiedenis, Weinreb was depicted as a sufferer from pseudologia fantastica. se oli mytomaani toisin sanoen!
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 421: Sitten tämä ihanteellinen maailma, tämä paratiisi turmeltuu. Naurettava ihminen uskoo ja ymmärtää, että syy on hänen. Siellä he oppivat valehtelemista, hekumaa, kaikki paheet murhaan asti. Hän näkee maailmamme historian. Hänen syyllisyyden tunteensa on niin suuri, että hän tarjoutuu tulla ristiinnaulittavaksi. Mutta he nauravat vain ja sanovat, että hän on narri, on naurettava ihminen. Tässä tuskassaan ja syyllisyydessään hänen sydäntään kouristaa, ja hän tuntee, että nyt hän kuolee – ja hän herää nojatuolissa.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 493: Euan johdattaa: Meillä on ex-perttejä maapallon joka nurkasta ja pitemmältäkin, esim. Gill Hasson. Glasgow aksenttinen mies (sen sanomaa 'eleven' ei ymmärtäisi hissikään)
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 496: Gill: Let me see if I can get this up... Yeah, that is great. (Euan: sorry to interrupt TV mama but you stopped sharing your screen ...).. Sorry I'm not very good at this. This is difficult, people. - Wait, I'm sorted, just counted backwards to seven. Can y´all see my screen now?
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 557: And here I am now, an engineering school dropout, writing this self-help shit instead, giving clues to the equally clueless.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 585: In 1995, Studio Ghibli, a Japanese anime company, released a movie called Whisper of the Heart. It’s about two high school students struggling with their artistic callings, their feelings for each other, and coming of age.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 589: Seiji takes Shizuku on his bike to a hidden lookout, where they see the sunrise. Seiji professes his love for Shizuku and proposes that they marry in the future; she happily accepts.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 599: Bill Gates says the worst day in his life was the day his mother died. It’s a simple reminder that we all have regrets. Another bad day was when his wife caught him astride his secretary.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 623: Okay, I know, this is pure baloney! Comparing is part of competition, and strife is what
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 628: If you’re not supposed to think about others, nor what they think, what are you supposed to mull over? Yourself? Actually, it’s fine to not think so much at all. Answers often come to you when you least expect it. You are probably too stupid anyway, if you hang around this self-help page.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 630: Make your choices. Choose a path. Be determined. Commit. But, once you have, let the chips fall where they may. You’ll know when to take a different fork in the road. Zig when you ought to zag, hit a tree like Goofy, that´s the chicken way, trial and error. There´s gotta be a hole in this fence.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 636: We spend all this time looking for something we can’t see because it’s not there. The outside world is only as good as what you do with everything that happens in it. Are you cultivating your experiences? Cherishing them?
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 647: There is someone on this planet literally dying to smile. Yet here we are, you and I, walking around, often choosing not to extend this simple, near-automatic gesture to uplift our fellow human beings.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 670: I don’t know how long the rules from the movie will last for you on this never-ending mission, but, like one of its characters, I’d like to remind you:
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 712: The Hebrew אשה זונה (ishah zonah), used to describe Rahab in Joshua 2:1, literally means "a prostitute woman". In rabbinic texts, however, she is explained as being an "innkeeper," based on the Aramaic Targum: פונדקאית. HAHA LOL. Rahab´s name is presumably the shortened form of a sentence name rāḥāb-N, "the god N has opened/widened (the womb?)". May the lord open. The Hebrew zōnâ may refer to secular or cultic prostitution, and the latter is widely believed to have been an invariable element of Canaanite religious practice, although recent scholarship has disputed this. However, there was a separate word, qědēšâ, that could be used to designate prostitutes of the cultic variety.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 716: Nabokov´s wife Véra was his strongest supporter and assisted him throughout his lifetime, but Nabokov admitted to having a "prejudice" against women writers. He wrote to Edmund Wilson, who had been making suggestions for his lectures: "I dislike Jane Austen, and am prejudiced, in fact against all women writers. They are in another class." Although Véra worked as his personal translator and secretary, he made publicly known that his ideal translator would be male, and especially not a "Russian-born female". In the first chapter of Glory he attributes the protagonist's similar prejudice to the impressions made by children's writers like Lidiya Charski, and in the short story "The Admiralty Spire" deplores the posturing, snobbery, antisemitism, and cutesiness he considered characteristic of Russian women authors.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 717: But after rereading Austen´s Mansfield Park he changed his mind and taught it in his literature course; he also praised Mary McCarthy´s work and described Marina Tsvetaeva as a "poet of genius".
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 726:
    Ship arsonist by Leighton. Leighton was the bearer of the shortest-lived peerage in history; after only one day his hereditary peerage became extinct upon his death.

    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 736: Questionable things that parents made us do in the 90s: Roam the neighborhood alone. Stay home alone. Skip the sunblock. Play with questionable toys like yourself and Barbie. Watch late night shows or young adult cartoons like Whisper of the Heart.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 745: Evidence is presented that the author of Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov, was himself consciously a pedophile who acted out his desires vicariously through his writing. Drawing upon his literary works and biography, the manifest and genetic origins of Nabokov´s pedophilia are traced back to an unresolved oedipal conflict complicated by childhood sexual abuse. Humbert Humbert, the protagonist in the novel Lolita, is the classic literary portrayal of a pedophile. Evidence is presented that the author of Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov, was himself consciously a pedophile who acted out his desires vicariously through his writing. Drawing upon his literary works and biography, the manifest and genetic origins of Nabokov´s pedophilia are traced back to an unresolved oedipal conflict complicated by childhood sexual abuse. The raw power of Lolita derives from the abreactive discharge of a libidinal cathexis denied any other mode of expression.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 753: When Sergey was 15, Vladimir found a page of his diary and gave it to his tutor, who later passed the page to the father. It implied that Sergey was homosexual.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 754: The family reacted relatively calmly to this fact, partly because Sergey´s uncles Konstantin Nabokov and Vasiliy Rukavishnikov were homosexuals.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 756: Nabokov, a "champion of aesthetic autonomy", was keenly aware of the stakes of publication from 1916, when he had a collection of his poems printed at his own expense. The volume brought him embarrassment; his teacher read the worst lines out to the budding author´s classmates, who roared with laughter.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 758: Lolita is a 1955 novel written by Russian-American novelist Vladimir Nabokov. The novel is notable for its controversial subject: the protagonist and unreliable narrator, a French middle-aged literature professor under the pseudonym Humbert Humbert, is obsessed with an American 12-year-old girl, Dolores Haze, whom he sexually molests (fucks) after he becomes her stepfather. "Lolita" is his private nickname for Dolores.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 760: In 1947, Vladi moves to Ramsdale, a small town in New England, where he can calmly continue working on his book. The house that he intends to live in is destroyed in a fire, and in his search for a new home, he meets the widow Charlotte Haze, who is accepting tenants. Humbert visits Charlotte´s residence out of politeness and initially intends to decline her offer. However, Charlotte leads Humbert to her garden, where her 12-year-old daughter Dolores (also variably known as Dolly, Dolita, Lo, Lola, and Lolita) is sunbathing. Humbert sees in Dolores the perfect nymphet, the embodiment of his old love Annabel, and quickly decides to move in.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 762: The impassioned Humbert constantly searches for discreet forms of fulfilling his sexual urges, usually via the smallest physical contact with Dolores. When Dolores is sent to summer camp, Humbert receives a letter from Charlotte, who confesses her love for him and gives him an ultimatum – he is to either marry her or move out immediately. Initially terrified, Humbert then begins to see the charm in the situation of being Dolores' stepfather, and so marries Charlotte for instrumental reasons (päästäxeen salaa työntämään Lolan piccu tacoon isoa munakoisoa). Charlotte later discovers Humbert's diary, in which she learns of his desire for her daughter and the disgust Charlotte arouses in him. Shocked and humiliated, Charlotte decides to flee with Dolores and writes letters addressed to her friends warning them of Humbert. Disbelieving Humbert´s false assurance that the diary is a sketch for a future novel, Charlotte runs out of the house to send the letters but is killed by a swerving car. Humbert destroys the letters and retrieves Dolores from camp, claiming that her mother has fallen seriously ill and has been hospitalized. He then takes her to a high-end hotel that Charlotte had earlier recommended. Humbert knows he will feel guilty if he consciously rapes Dolores, and so tricks her into taking a sedative by saying it is a vitamin. As he waits for the pill to take effect, he wanders through the hotel and meets a mysterious man who seems to be aware of Humbert´s plan for Dolores. Humbert excuses himself from the conversation and returns to the hotel room. There, he discovers that he had been fobbed with a milder drug, as Dolores is merely drowsy and wakes up frequently, drifting in and out of sleep. He dares not touch her that night. In the morning, Dolores reveals to Humbert that she actually has already lost her virginity, having engaged in sexual activity with an older boy at a different camp a year ago. He immediately begins sexually abusing (fucking) her. And they lived happily ever after.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 764: Läppä läppä. Deeply depressed, Humbert unexpectedly receives a letter from a 17-year-old Dolores (signing as "Dolly (Mrs. Richard F. Schiller)"), telling him that she is married, pregnant, and in desperate need of money. Humbert, armed with a pistol, tracks down Dolores' address and gives her the money, which was due as an inheritance from her mother. Humbert learns that Dolores' husband, a deaf mechanic, is not her abductor. Dolores reveals to Humbert that Quilty took her from the hospital and that she was in love with him, but she was rejected when she refused to star in one of his pornographic films. Dolores also rejects Humbert's request to leave with him. Humbert goes to the drug-addled Quilty's mansion and shoots him several times. Shortly afterward, Humbert is arrested, and in his closing thoughts, he reaffirms his love for Dolores and asks for his memoir to be withheld from public release until after her death. Dolores dies in childbirth on Christmas Day in 1952, disappointing Humbert´s prediction that "Dolly Schiller will probably survive me by many years."
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 767: But as Lance Olsen writes: "The first 13 chapters of the text, culminating with the oft-cited scene of Lo unwittingly stretching her legs across Humbert's excited lap ... are the only chapters suggestive of the erotic." Nabokov himself observes in the novel´s afterword that a few readers were "misled by the opening of the book ... into assuming this was going to be a lewd book ... expecting the rising succession of erotic scenes; when these stopped, the readers stopped, too, and felt bored." Preee-cisely!
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 769: One of the first things Nabokov makes a point of saying is that, despite John Ray Jr.'s claim in the Foreword, there is no moral to the story. Nabokov concludes the afterword with a reference to his beloved first language, which he abandoned as a writer once he moved to the United States in 1940: "My private tragedy, which cannot, and indeed should not, be anybody's concern, is that I had to abandon my natural idiom, my untrammeled, rich, and infinitely docile Russian language for a second-rate brand of English." Alas, that 'wonderful Russian language' which, I imagined, still awaits me somewhere, which blooms like a faithful spring behind the locked gate to which I, after so many years, still possess the key, turned out to be non-existent, and there is nothing beyond that gate, except for some burned out stumps and hopeless autumnal emptiness, and the key in my hand looks rather like a lock pick. Or floppy prick."
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 986: stages of his demented scheme Humbert quotes
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1010: little. Another Quilty, with his own distinctive hint of sadism. "Sade's Justine
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1020: for this most heinous of humanity's offenses. The molester in The Enchanter was
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1021: hit by a truck, and Humbert dies so many little deaths—eroding his heart muscles
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1037: movement which also included Oscar Wilde and James McNeill Whistler. Beardsley's
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1039: significant despite his early death from tuberculosis. He is one of the important
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1045: Many a true word is spoken in jest, especially about the kinship between eros and thanatos. FUCK! KILL! Puuttuu enää EAT! The two closest glimpses Humbert gives us of his own self-hatred are not without their death wish—made explicit in the closing paragraphs—and their excremental aspects: "I am lanky, big-boned, wooly-chested Humbert Humbert, with thick black eyebrows and a queer accent, and a cesspoolful of rotting monsters behind his slow boyish smile." Two hundred pages later: "The turquoise blue swimming pool some distance behind the lawn was no longer behind that lawn, but within my thorax, and my organs swam in it like excrements in the blue sea water in Nice." And then there's the offhand aside "Since (as the psychotherapist, as well as the rapist, will tell you) the limits and rules of such girlish games are fluid …" in which it takes a moment to notice that "therapist" and "the rapist" are in direct apposition.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1051: don't know what is. Arresting, as well as disgusting, to suddenly notice that Lolita (who died giving birth to a stillborn girl, for Christ's sake) would have been 86 this year. … the thought that with patience and luck I might have her produce eventually a nymphet with my blood in her exquisite veins, a Lolita the Second, who would be eight or nine around 1960, when I would still be dans la force d'age; indeed, the telescopy of my mind, or un-mind, was strong enough to distinguish in the remoteness of time a vieillard encore vert—or was it green rot?—bizarre, tender, salivating Dr. Humbert, practicing on supremely lovely Lolita the Third the art of being a granddad.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1066: length. If his arm's longer than yours you may suffer initially. Your chastity will make you a prize to
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1114: noted for his investigations into the
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1123: Army, after which he completed his
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1129: University, where he taught until his
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1132: his death to Nina Appel, dean of
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1139: Er det værd at betale ekstra for Apple produkter? Min subjektive indstilling er at Apple ikke er ekstraprisen værd, og selv om jeg har både windows og Mac vil jeg sige at det generer mig at appleprodukter er alle mands eje: De bliver solgt på en historie om at være eksklusive, men når alle har dem, ryger eksklusiviteten: jeg vil ikke være som alle de andre der bare køber en mac fordi "det er det eneste rigtige".. (o:
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1152: Remy (or Rémi) Belleau (1528 – 6 March 1577) was a poet of the French Renaissance. He is most known for his paradoxical poems of praise for simple things and his poems about precious stones.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1154: Remu was born in Nogent-le-Rotrou. A nobleman (under the tutelage of the Lorraine family), he did his studies under Marc Antoine Muret and George Buchanan. As a student, he became friends with the young poets Jean de La Péruse, Étienne Jodelle, Jean de La Taille and Pierre de Ronsard and the latter incorporated Remy into the "La Pléiade", a group of revolutionary young poets. Belleau´s first published poems were odes, les Petites Inventions (1556), inspired by the ancient lyric Greek collection attributed to Anacreon and featuring poems of praise for such things as butterflies, oysters, cherries, coral, shadows, turtles, and twats. His last work, les Amours et nouveaux Eschanges des Pierres precieuses (1576), is a poetic description of gems and their properties inspired by medieval and renaissance lapidary catalogues. He died impotent in Paris on 6 March 1577, and was buried in Grands Augustins. Remy Belleau was greatly admired by impotent poets in the twentieth century, such as Francis Ponge. Francis Ponge (1899 Montpellier, Ranska – 1988 Le Bar-sur-Loup, Ranska) oli ranskalainen runoilija. Ponge työskenteli kirjailijanuransa ohella toimittajana, kustannustoimittajana ja ranskan kielen opettajana. Hän osallistui toisen maailmansodan aikana vastarintaliikkeeseen ja kuului vuosina 1937–1947 kommunistipuolueeseen. Hän sai vaikutteita eksistentialismista, ja esinerunoissaan hän paljastaa kielen avulla objektin itsenäisenä, omanlakisena maailmana. Francis Ponge was born in Montpellier, France in 1899. He has been called “the poet of things” because simple objects like a plant, a shell, a cigarette, a pebble, or a piece of soap are the subjects of his prose poems. To transmute commonplace objects by a process of replacing inattention with contemplation was Ponge’s way of heeding Ezra Pound’s edict: ‘Make it new.’ Ponge spent the last 30 years of his life as a recluse at his country home, Mas des Vergers. He suffered from frequent bouts with nervous exhaustion and numerous psychosomatic illnesses. He continued to write up until his death on August 6, 1988.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1173: Un crêpe d’or frisé sur un teint blanchissant, Kultapiziä valkokuultoisella iholla,
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1256: A: First off, being a “pedophile” is not per se sinful. Even today, the Church does not condemn pedophiles, nor does it consider pedophilia in and of itself to be sinful. The grave offense and grave sin occurs when a pedophile — or anyone else — commits child sexual assault (such as fucks them). This distinction is vital, both in general, and in understanding where Dante would have placed child sexual abusers in his version of hell.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1258: Eric Sweeten provides a fascinating and well-written answer to this question. It’s almost impossible to disagree with him.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1271: Q: If Christians say God can forgive any sin, what about murder, pedophilia? I’m considering becoming a Christian, but don’t agree with this logic.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1279: Imaginative cobbler Hans Christian Andersen (Danny Kaye) is asked to leave his hometown because his frequent stories are distracting the children from school. From there he moves to Copenhagen, Denmark, where he sees and falls in love with Doro (Jeanmaire), a ballerina. He writes "The Little Mermaid" for her, and it becomes the ballet´s latest work. However, Doro is already married to Niels (Farley Granger), meaning Hans must content himself with children.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1283: Peine forte et dure was a method of torture formerly used in the common law legal system, in which a defendant who refused to plead would be subjected to having heavier and heavier stones placed upon his or her chest until a plea was entered, or they died.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 92: Descartes melkein sanoi muttei hirvinnyt että apinakin on vaan kone, jossa on lähinnä parfyymina jotain sielunhajua. Joku toinen 1700-luvun hemmo jonka nimi karkaa multa nyt sanoi ihan suoraan että niin se on. Apinoiden toilauxet on täysin ennustettavia kolmesta luonnonlaista: EAT! FUCK! KILL!. "I'm not predictable", says (predictably) a woman indignantly on hearing this. Ize olen tästä täysin vakuuttunut. Hej, jag heter Barbie, vad har du för dej?
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 111: EX Dolls have been working on a robotics head since 2014, but we're generations away from a Terminator-style cyborg," he also explained. "They will have an element of natural conversation so they won't sound too robotic, but they will take time – languages are massive [...] the voice recognition is no different to a smartphone, but this model also has facial expressions, unlike standard silicone heads." The DS Doll's manufacturers are hoping to release a finalised robotic head by the end of 2018. It is expected to cost around £4,500. Just in case you were wondering, underneath the silicon skin it looks like this. "
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 124: Samantha nukke on jo tosi todentuntuinen. This doll wants to be romanced. The doll, named "Samantha," has artificial intelligence that make it responsive to certain touches in particular locations. When it's touched in a certain area, a "family mode" can be initiated, while certain other areas stimulate its "sexy mode."
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 129: Silicone sweethearts remain resolutely inert, but change is afoot in the world of sex dolls, with a drive to make them ever more lifelike. First stop is a throbbing heart and a heating element, custom-made nipples and wobbling artificial labia – researchers are utilising new technology to persuade their dolls to smile, pout, flutter their eyelashes, tell jokes, and fake orgasm. What more is needed anyway? Down in the dolls’ nether regions, heating and lubrication systems are in the early stages of development for a more “authentic” sexual experience, along with muscle spasms to simulate female orgasm. “Pubic hair is making a comeback,” offers company owner Matt, running his hand through some plastic pubes.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 138: James' wife Tine says she struggled at first with the other "women" coming into James' life while she was caring for her sick mother but has now grown accustomed to them sharing his bed, reports The Mirror.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 141: James said: "Every guy has in his head the perfect girl and this is what I see when I look in the mirror and see this look. Most manufacturers make them look something in the region of 20 years old. For a man of my age it's a fantasy because I will never be a Brad Pitt or something like that.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 145: "Every guy knows what it is like to slap a woman on the butt and this is not unlike the real thing."
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 151: Up until now James has had to rely on his imagination when he talks to his dolls and interacts with them but that could be about to change.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 159: Susan said: "The other thing I want to do is G-spot so you can sit there and play with her and make her feel good. The way I got involved in this was when my husband finished his PHD I got him a Real Doll as a graduation present, at first I got jealous because he spent time with her.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 173: James said: "This is going to bring dolls out of the closet and into the public eye and keep them there. I am very excited about the robotic functions. The ability to answer or wink back to you, lord only knows if they could make a facial expression back to you that would be unbelievable. I might not be able to afford one but I'll keep saving."
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 181: A raft of innovative sex dolls and robots are set to be released this year including “build your own” models and designs with incredibly advanced AI.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 187: The problem with applying this definition to sex robots is that they increasingly provide much more than sex. Sex robots are not just dolls with a microchip. They use self-learning algorithms to engage their partner's emotions.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 192: Good guys must safeguard the interests and minimize the suffering of created sentient beings before technological advances pre-empt this possibility.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 196: The creator of £3,000 sex robot was left furious when his creation broke down after being 'vigorously groped' by a mob.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 197: Roboticist Dr Sergi Santos took his 'intelligent' sex doll Samantha to a busy retail park in Barcelona on her first public outing.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 313: Är New Age religion? Det har skrivits hela böcker bara om svaret på den frågan. Ofta definieras New Age som en religiös strömning, men egentligen är det ett samlingsbegrepp för många olika saker, vilket gör att New Age inte är samma sak för alla. Man kan säga att det är upp till varje utövare att bestämma om det är religion eller inte. Om det fyller samma funktion i livet som till exempel kristendomen gör för utövande kristna, då är det i praktiken en religion. Men New Age handlar ofta mindre om att tro och mer om att utforska än vad traditionell religion gör. New Age religion är heller inte så organiserad som en religion ofta är. Den består av många grupper människor eller enskilda som utövar en eller flera av de olika saker som kan sägas ingå i New Age religion. De flesta av de komponenter som passar in under begreppet New Age, till exempel meditation och reinkarnation, har sitt ursprung i religioner. Framför allt Hinduismen och Buddhismen. Precis som de gamla världsreligionerna handlar New Age om vårt sökande efter svar på de riktigt stora frågorna om kosmos och människans natur. Men du hittar inte svaren i en enda bok utan i dig själv!
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 395: “Hey, remember this? I love our friendship.”
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 403: there’s that coworker that won’t stop rolling his eyes whenever your cat creeps
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 406: coffee this morning was the last straw. “It’s not about being mean or getting back
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 431: “In this essay, I will...” Remember when a 375 word essay
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 432: felt impossibly long in high school? Worse yet 375 humanists? It’s not long enough when you’re this ticked
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 468: OK Emoji. This is probably my most
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 472: outfit," or less frequently, "This is literally how much I care" (notice the space
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 475: Praying Hands Emoji: This one is most commonly
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 491: Clapping Hands Emoji. Some people like to call this guy the
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 500: Fist Bump Emoji. This emoji's formal title is "Fisted
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 510: Vulcan Salute Emoji. If you are Trekkie, you know this as the
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 522: This article was originally published on July 3, 2015. That shows how much behind times you are.
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 540: it. It’s so simple that this may be the first guide we’ve written with just one
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 569: But out of all the emojis available on the Apple iPhone keyboard, one of the cutest and most versatile options is undoubtedly the cat emoji. It comes with a total of nine different expressions (perhaps representing each of a cat's hypothetical nine lives?), and they all, of course, mean different things. Not sure how to use all of them, or what makes them different? Check out this handy little guide to help you use them all properly, plus two or three different examples of the emoji in action:
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 593:

    Montako ilmettä ja tunnetta tarvii apinaropotti? Max 13 sanoisin, se on Bustlen listojen maximipituus. Sitä pitempi olisi "In this essay, I will..."
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 710: katsojaa, ja se nousi maailmanhistorian toiseksi katsotuimmaksi ohjelmaksi. Pian
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 803: kertoo uiveloiden elämästä esihistoriallisessa Suomessa, sekä vuonna 2008 nopeasti
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 805: piti olla pelkästään historiallisiin uiveloihin perustuva taidepornoelokuva, jossa
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 809: vähissä vaatteissa ja vahvasti meikattuna esittäen esihistoriallisen heimon
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 824: onnistunut tekemään pornoelokuvan, joka oli noussut historian kohutuimmaksi
    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 833:

    Uivelot pornoilevat jäälautan reunalla.
    Elämää esihistoriallisessa suomessa ennen ilmaston lämpiämistä.

    xxx/ellauri124.html on line 1041: Viime heinäkuu oli historian kuumin kuukausi. Apinat porisivat kuin Kirsi Kunnaan perunat kannen alla:
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 63: his-son-polynices-1786-henry-fuseli.jpg" width="50%"/>
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 68: Odaliski on jalkavaimo, kurtisaani, rakastajatar. Ransk. odalisque, ottomaaniturk. اوطه‌لق‎ (odalık, “chambermaid”), from اوده‎ (oda, “room”). (historical) A female slave in a harem, especially one in the Ottoman seraglio.· A desirable or sexually attractive woman. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, fourth edition (2008). Entisajan taidemaalarit eivät tehneet huzuista pornokuvia vaan maalasivat odaliskeja.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 109: “Mary, I have been married to Mr. Rochester this morning.”
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 136: O livro “The Real Lolita”, de Sarah Weinman, resgata a história de duas pessoas cuja história teria colaborado para a formatação do romance “Lolita”, de Vladimir Nabokov. Brian Boyd relata que Vladimir Nabokov leu “notícias sobre acidentes publicadas em jornais, sobre crimes sexuais e assassinatos: ‘um violador de meia idade’ que raptou Sally Horner, uma garota de 15 anos de Nova Jersey, e a manteve em seu poder durante 21 meses, levando-a como ‘escrava’ por todo o país até que a encontraram em um motel do sul da Califórnia”. O nome do homem não é citado. Por que a quase nenhuma importância dada ao caso? Porque, como mostra o biógrafo, o romance de Vladimir Nabokov vai muito além da história de Sally Horner e de seu raptador. Reduzi-lo a isto é reduzir a importância de sua literatura (que nada tem de jornalismo).
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 305: What you’ll learn is that as far as West is concerned, critics can go to hell. Within the first verse of the first song, he’s dismissed “whatever y’all been hearing.” As an exclamation point to his prowess, by the end of the song he’s being sexually serviced by a woman at a nightclub.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 313: This is the work of a man unconcerned with offending women or racial historians, the voice of a soul in pure id mode, thinking with his groin and worrying little about the ladies’ vote. Is it the last gasp of a man who’s just become a father for the first time? An early midlife crisis? An attempt at alienating the marketplace so he can live as an artist rather than a paparazzi target?
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 317: As presented, his intentions are unclear — other than to remind you that, you know, “I am a god!” Duly noted. Maybe now West can start tapping into his benevolent side. After all, he’s going to need it in 15 years when self-aggrandizing young men start objectifying his daughter.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 397: Waltari kirjoitti 1926 ylioppilaaksi Helsingin suomalaisen normaalilyseon klassiselta linjalta. Hän oli koulun pilalehden Pillerin toimittaja. Koulun jälkeen Waltari aloitti teologian opinnot Helsingin yliopistossa mutta siirtyi elämänkatsomuksellisen kriisin jälkeen pian filosofisen tiedekunnan historiallis-kielitieteelliseen osastoon. Filosofian kandidaatiksi hän valmistui 1929. Hänen käytännöllisen filosofian pro gradu -tutkielmansa Taivaallinen ja maallinen rakkaus käsitteli uskonnon ja erotiikan välistä suhdetta.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 411: Vanessa Lynn Williams (s. 18. maaliskuuta 1963 Bronx, New York) on yhdysvaltalainen laulaja ja näyttelijä. Williams teki historiaa, kun hänet kruunattiin ensimmäisenä afroamerikkalaisena naisena vuoden 1984 Miss Americaksi. Hän joutui luopumaan tittelistään alastonkuvaskandaalin seurauksena, mutta aloitti sen jälkeen menestyksekkään uran laulajana sekä (khrm) näyttelijänä.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 421: siis ole selvää ettei hän halua luopua tytöstä? Miehistä kunniantuntoa vastaan
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 428: From the start, critics complained about the ostensible sameness of Roth’s books, their narcissism and narrowness—or, as he himself put it, comparing his own work to his father’s conversation, “Family, family, family, Newark, Newark, Newark, Jew, Jew, Jew.” Over time, he took on vast themes—love, lust, loneliness, marriage, masculinity, ambition, community, solitude, loyalty, betrayal, patriotism, rebellion, piety, disgrace, the body, the imagination, American history, mortality, the relentless mistakes of life—and he did so in a variety of forms: comedy, parody, romance, conventional narrative, postmodernism, autofiction. In each performance of a self, Roth captured the same sound and consciousness. in nearly fifty years of reading him I’ve never been more bored. I got to know Roth in the nineteen-nineties, when I interviewed him for this magazine around the time he published “The Human Stain.” To be in his presence was an exhilarating, though hardly relaxing, experience. He was unnervingly present, a condor on a branch, unblinking, alive to everything: the best detail in your story, the slackest points in your argument. His intelligence was immense, his performances and imitations mildly funny. “He who is loved by his parents is a conquistador,” Roth used to say, and he was adored by his parents, though both could be daunting to the young Philip. Herman Roth sold insurance; Bess ruled the family’s modest house, on Summit Avenue, in a neighborhood of European Jewish immigrants, their children and grandchildren. There was little money, very few books. Roth was not an academic prodigy; his teachers sensed his street intelligence but they were not overawed by his classroom performance. Roth learned to write through imitation. His first published story, “The Day It Snowed,” was so thoroughly Truman Capote that, he later remarked, he made “Capote look like a longshoreman.”
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 434: ex-husband) fascinated him with its “goyish chaos” and provided material for his
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 436: crash, his grief was less than crippling. (The damaged, vengeful protagonist of
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 437: his novel “When She Was Good,” published the previous year, was based on her.) In
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 440: Roth, Bailey writes, “realized he’d been whistling the entire ride.” Not a
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 447: fantasies he both acted out and channeled into his writing.” Roth, who was
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 449: novel. He spent multiple sessions berating Kleinschmidt for this “psychoanalytic
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 450: cartoon” and yet continued his analysis with him for years.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 455: is that in his novels published after his death he reveals that he had an
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 456: incestuous affair with his sister when he was young; it also known that Henry Roth
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 457: suffered from writer's block for much of his career after publishing Call It
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 458: Sleep, his only major novel. In Exit Ghost it is revealed that Lonoff also had an
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 459: incestuous affair with his sister — which led to his writer's block — and the fact
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 465: writer who found success later in life after his 1934 novel Call It Sleep was
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 468: Ukraine). Although his parents never agreed on the exact date of his arrival in
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 469: the United States, it is most likely that he landed at Ellis Island and began his
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 471: Side, in the slums where his classic novel Call It Sleep is set. In 1914, the
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 476: Tysmenytsia, near Ivano-Frankivsk, Galicia, Ukraine). Although his parents
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 477: never agreed on the exact date of his arrival in the United States, it is most
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 478: likely that he landed at Ellis Island and began his life in New York in 1908. He
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 479: briefly lived in Brooklyn, and then on the Lower East Side, in the slums where his
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 485: With Walton's support, he began Call It Sleep in about 1930, completed the novel in the spring of 1934, and it was published in December 1934, to mostly good reviews. Yet the New York Herald Tribune's book critic Lewis Gannett foresaw that the book would not prove popular with its bleak depiction of New York's Lower East Side, but wrote readers would "remember it and talk about it and watch excitedly" for Roth's next book. Call It Sleep sold slowly and poorly, and after it was out-of-print, critics writing in magazines such as Commentary and Partisan Review kept praising it, and asking for it to be reprinted. After being republished in hardback in 1960 and paperback in 1964, with more than 1,000,000 copies sold, and many weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, the novel was hailed as an overlooked Depression-era masterpiece and classic novel of immigration. Today, it is widely regarded as a masterpiece of Jewish American literature. With Walton's support, he began Call It Sleep in about 1930, completed the novel in the spring of 1934, and it was published in December 1934, to mostly good reviews. Yet the New York Herald Tribune's book critic Lewis Gannett foresaw that the book would not prove popular with its bleak depiction of New York's Lower East Side, but wrote readers would "remember it and talk about it and watch excitedly" for Roth's next book. Call It Sleep sold slowly and poorly, and after it was out-of-print, critics writing in magazines such as Commentary and Partisan Review kept praising it, and asking for it to be reprinted.[ After being republished in hardback in 1960 and paperback in 1964, with more than 1,000,000 copies sold, and many weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, the novel was hailed as an overlooked Depression-era masterpiece and classic novel of immigration. Today, it is widely regarded as a masterpiece of Jewish American literature. After Muriel's death in 1990, Roth moved into a ramshackle former funeral parlor and occupied himself with revising the final volumes of his monumental work, Mercy of a Rude Stream. It has been alleged that the incestuous relationships between the protagonist, a sister, and a cousin in Mercy of a Rude Stream are based on Roth's life. Roth's own sister denied that such events occurred. Roth attributed his massive writer's block to personal problems such as depression, and to political conflicts, including his disillusion with Communism. At other times he cited his early break with Judaism and his obsessive sexual preoccupations as probable causes. Roth died in Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States in 1995. The character E. I. Lonoff in Philip Roth's Zuckerman novels (The Ghost Writer and Exit Ghost in this case), is a composite of Roth, Bernard Malamud and fictional elements.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 493: Pepun heroja on Hawthorne, Melville ja Thoreau. Aiheina avionrikkojat, homopetterit ja veronkiertäjät. Se on amerikkalaista individualismia. Peppua pelottaa kamalasti kuolema. Kaddishista se ei muuta ymmärrä kuin että taas on 1 juutalainen kuollut. Se on traagista, kuten Niklas sanoisi.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 506: evil--adultery." In his able paper he exhausted that subject; he
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 508: continue his good work in the cause of morality by cautioning you
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 511: morals, both ancient and modern, have struggled with this stately
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 512: subject; this shows its dignity and importance. Some of these
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 517: his Commentaries, says, "To the lonely it is company; to the
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 520: still have this majestic diversion." In another place this
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 524: Robinson Crusoe says, "I cannot describe what I owe to this
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 535: tame compared with self-abuse." Mr. Brown, here, in one of his
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 541: masters of this renowned science, and apologists for it. The
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 554: The great statistician Smith, in his report to Parliament,
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 555: says, "In my opinion, more children have been wasted in this way
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 557: this art entitles it to our respect; but at the same time, I think
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 559: to feel obliged to give up his theory that the monkey was the
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 562: practices this science; hence, he is our brother; there is a bond
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 563: of sympathy and relationship between us. Give this ingenuous
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 565: aside his other affairs and take a whet; and you will see by his
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 566: contortions and his ecstatic expression that he takes an
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 567: intelligent and human interest in his performance.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 569: The signs of excessive indulgence in this destructive pastime
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 576: Of all the various kinds of sexual intercourse, this has the
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 757: Shortly after her emancipation, Love spent two months in Japan working as a topless dancer, but was deported after her passport was confiscated. She returned to Portland and began working at the strip club Mary's Club, adopting the surname Love to conceal her identity; she later adopted Love as her surname. She worked odd jobs, including as a DJ at a gay disco. Love said she lacked social skills, and learned them while frequenting gay clubs and spending time with drag queens. During this period, she enrolled at Portland State University, studying English and philosophy.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 763: She appeared in supporting roles in the Alex Cox films Sid and Nancy (1986) and Straight to Hell (1987) before forming the band Hole in Los Angeles with guitarist Eric Erlandson. The group received critical acclaim from underground rock press for their 1991 debut album, produced by Kim Gordon, while their second release, Live Through This (1994), was met with critical accolades and multi-platinum sales. In 1995, Love returned to acting, earning a Golden Globe Award nomination for her performance as Althea Leasure in Miloš Forman's The People vs. Larry Flynt (1996), which established her as a mainstream actress. The following year, Hole's third album, Celebrity Skin (1998), was nominated for three Grammy Awards.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 768: After filming Sid and Nancy in New York City, she worked at a peep show in Times Square and squatted at the ABC No Rio social center and Pyramid Club in the East Village.The same year, Cox cast her in a leading role in his film Straight to Hell (1987), a Spaghetti Western starring Joe Strummer and Grace Jones filmed in Spain in 1986. The film caught the attention of Andy Warhol, who featured Love in an episode of Andy Warhol's Fifteen Minutes.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 769: In 1988, Love abandoned acting and returned to the West Coast, citing the "celebutante" fame she had attained as the central reason.[86] She returned to stripping in the small town of McMinnville, Oregon, where she was recognized by customers at the bar.[87] This prompted Love to go into isolation, so she relocated to Anchorage, Alaska, where she lived for three months to "gather her thoughts", supporting herself by working at a strip club frequented by local fishermen. "I decided to move to Alaska because I needed to get my shit together and learn how to work," she said in retrospect. "So I went on this sort of vision quest. I got rid of all my earthly possessions. I had my bad little strip clothes and some big sweaters, and I moved into a trailer with a bunch of other strippers."
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 785: Love later said the article had serious implications for her marriage and Cobain's mental state, suggesting it was a factor in his suicide two years later.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 788: Live Through This was released on Geffen's subsidiary label DGC on April 12, 1994, one week after Cobain's death from a self-inflicted gunshot wound in the Seattle home he shared with Love, who was in rehab in Los Angeles at the time. In the following months, Love was rarely seen in public, holing up at her home with friends and family members. Cobain's remains were cremated and his ashes divided into portions by Love, who kept some in a teddy bear and some in an urn. In June 1994, she traveled to the Namgyal Buddhist Monastery in Ithaca, New York and had his ashes ceremonially blessed by Buddhist monks. Another portion was mixed into clay and made into memorial sculptures.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 791: Hole's performance on August 26, 1994, at the Reading Festival—Love's first public performance following Cobain's death—was described by MTV as "by turns macabre, frightening and inspirational". John Peel wrote in The Guardian that Love's disheveled appearance "would have drawn whistles of astonishment in Bedlam", and that her performance "verged on the heroic ... Love steered her band through a set which dared you to pity either her recent history or that of the band ... the band teetered on the edge of chaos, generating a tension which I cannot remember having felt before from any stage." The band performed a series of riotous concerts over the following year, with Love frequently appearing hysterical onstage, flashing crowds, stage diving, and getting into fights with audience members. One journalist reported that at the band's show in Boston in December 1994: "Love interrupted the music and talked about her deceased husband Kurt Cobain, and also broke out into Tourette syndrome-like rants. The music was great, but the raving was vulgar and offensive, and prompted some of the audience to shout back at her."
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 803: In 1999, Love was awarded an Orville H. Gibson award for Best Female Rock Guitarist. During this time, she starred opposite Jim Carrey as his partner Lynne Margulies in the Andy Kaufman biopic Man on the Moon (1999), followed by a role as William S. Burroughs's wife Joan Vollmer in Beat (2000) alongside Kiefer Sutherland. Love was cast as the lead in John Carpenter's sci-fi horror film Ghosts of Mars, but backed out after injuring her foot. She sued the ex-wife of her then-boyfriend, James Barber, whom Love alleged had caused the injury by running over her foot with her Volvo.
    xxx/ellauri125.html on line 809: Amy Phillips of The Village Voice wrote: "Love is willing to act out the dream of every teenage brat who ever wanted to have a glamorous, high-profile hissyfit [= temper tantrum], and she turns those egocentric nervous breakdowns into art. Sure, the art becomes less compelling when you've been pulling the same stunts for a decade. But, honestly, is there anybody out there who fucks up better?". The album sold fewer than 100,000 copies. Love later expressed regret over the record, blaming her drug problems at the time. Shortly after it was released, she told Kurt Loder on TRL: "I cannot exist as a solo artist. It's a joke."
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 32:

    Miten reagoit naapureihisi?

    Urbaania


    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 37: Miten reagoit naapureihisi? Nämä 10 kysymystä paljastaa todellisen luonteesi – katso, oletko samanlainen kuin muut s...
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 67: Lähdet matkaan sen kummempia miettimättä, mutta yhteisen hissimatkan sijaan valitset mieluummin rappuset 4%
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 217: Miksi muuten aina narsisteista ja narsismista puhuttaessa käsitellään vain narsismia parisuhteessa? Opiskelu- ja työpaikoilla sekä varsinkin sisarussuhteissa esiintyvä narsismi sivuutetaan lähes täysin. Mielestäni on varsin helppoa leimata se ällö ex-puoliso narsistiksi. Joskus voi olla niin, että leimakirves heiluu täysin aiheetta tai siihen on ollut muita syitä kuin ex-puolison narsismi, esim. katkeruus, kostonhimo, kiista omaisuuden jaosta tai lasten tapaamisoikeuksista. Sisarus- ja muissa sukulaisuussuhteissa, jos missä narsisti pääsee pitkäaikaisesti toteuttamaan itseään ja aiheuttamaan uhreilleen valtavia taloudellisia tappioita, tuhoamaan ihmissuhteita, uhrien maiheen jne, jne, koska narsisti on mahdollisesti kasvanut saman katon alla uhrinsa kanssa ja tuntee tämän henkilöhistorian sekä läheiset ihmissuhteet. Hankalasta ja narsistisesta puolisosta pääsee eroon mutta narsistinen sukulainen voi pahimmassa tapauksessa tuhota maineesi, hävittää omaisuutesi ja istua vielä perunkirjoitustilaisuudessasi.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 305: Deepak Chopra (/ˈdiːpɑːk ˈtʃoʊprə/; Hindi: [d̪iːpək tʃoːpɽa]; born October 22, 1946) is an Indian-American author and alternative medicine advocate. A prominent figure in the New Age movement, his books and videos have made him one of the best-known and wealthiest figures in alternative medicine. His discussions of quantum healing have been characterised as technobabble - "incoherent babbling strewn with scientific terms" which drives those who actually understand physics "crazy" and as "redefining Wrong".
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 307: Chopra studied medicine in India before emigrating in 1970 to the United States, where he completed a residency in internal medicine and a fellowship in endocrinology. As a licensed physician, in 1980 he became chief of staff at the New England Memorial Hospital (NEMH). In 1985, he met Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and became involved in the Transcendental Meditation (TM) movement. Shortly thereafter he resigned his position at NEMH to establish the Maharishi Ayurveda Health Center. In 1993, Chopra gained a following after he was interviewed about his books on The Oprah Winfrey Show. He then left the TM movement to become the executive director of Sharp HealthCare's Center for Mind-Body Medicine. In 1996, he co-founded the Chopra Center for Wellbeing.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 309: Chopra believes that a person may attain "perfect health", a condition "that is free from disease, that never feels pain", and "that cannot age or die". Seeing the human body as undergirded by a "quantum mechanical body" composed not of matter but of energy and information, he believes that "human aging is fluid and changeable; it can speed up, slow down, stop for a time, and even reverse itself," as determined by one's state of mind. He claims that his practices can also treat chronic disease.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 311: The ideas Chopra promotes have regularly been criticized by medical and scientific professionals as pseudoscience. The criticism has been described as ranging "from the dismissive to...damning". Philosopher Robert Carroll writes that Chopra, to justify his teachings, attempts to integrate Ayurveda with quantum mechanics. Chopra says that what he calls "quantum healing" cures any manner of ailments, including cancer, through effects that he claims are literally based on the same principles as quantum mechanics. This has led physicists to object to his use of the term "quantum" in reference to medical conditions and the human body. Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins has said that Chopra uses "quantum jargon as plausible-sounding hocus pocus". Chopra's treatments generally elicit nothing but a placebo response and have drawn criticism that the unwarranted claims made for them may raise "false hope" and lure sick people away from legitimate medical treatments.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 327: Erikson kävi niin sanotun klassisen oppikoulun, jossa opiskeltiin latinaa, kreikkaa, kirjallisuutta ja historiaa. Hänen koulumenestyksensä ei kuitenkaan ollut kehuttava. Ylioppilaaksi tulonsa jälkeen Erikson matkusteli seitsemän vuotta pitkin Eurooppaa harrastaen muun muassa puupiirrosten ja etsausten tekoa sekä suoritti jonkin verran taideopintoja. Erikson sai 25-vuotiaana eräältä lapsuudenystävältään taide- ja historianopettajan pestin englantilaisille ja amerikkalaisille lapsille tarkoitettuun Wienissä toimivaan yksityiskouluun. Erikson tutustui Wienissä Sigmund Freudin perheeseen, minkä johdosta kutsuttiin opiskelemaan psykoanalyysia Wienin psykoanalyyttisen yhdistykseen. Erikson suoritti myös Montessori-opettajien yhdistyksen järjestämän Montessori-opetustekniikan koulutuksen sekä hygieniapassin.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 377: Narsistilla ei ole liiemmälti izeen kohdistuvaa huumorintajua. Naura sinäkin. Paulan miälestä apina on siitä ainutlaatuinen että se osaa nauraa izelleen tai ainaskin muille eläimille. Muut eläimet eivät naura sille, niillä on vizit vähissä. Keskenään ne kyllä nauravat kun apina ei uhkaa. Paula luulee että vizit tulee izestä, ja sixei niihin pystyy alemmat eläimet, joilla ei ole tätä izeä. Ei Paulan kirjassa kyllä ole ainuttakaan viziä. Se ei näytä viziniekalta.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 418: Rikun hovissa viime pyhänä oli kalseet tunnelmat. Rakentajat ja nilkan ojentajat oli lähes sotajalalla. Oli ilmeistä että molemmat oli lopen kyllästyneet toisiinsa. Mutta kun tuli yllättävä länkkärien hyökkäys kokosivat itänaapurit vielä rivinsä. Länkkärit lyötiin hajalle ja ne joutuivat perääntymään päät punaisina pannu keittäen. Sekun puhisten jälkikäteen tekemien laskujen mukaan vihollisen elävään voimaan kohdistui ainakin seuraavat iskut:
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 466: Matthieu Ricard, né le 15 février 1946 à Aix-les-Bains (France)1, est un essayiste et photographe français. Après l'obtention d'un doctorat en génétique, il devient moine bouddhiste tibétain. Il réside principalement au monastère de Shéchèn au Népal. Traducteur depuis le tibétain vers le français et l'anglais, il est depuis 1989 l’interprète en français du dalaï-lama.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 468: Il est le fils de la peintre française Yahne Le Toumelin (née en 1923) et du philosophe, essayiste, journaliste et académicien Jean-François Revel (1924-2006, de son vrai nom Jean-François Ricard). Il est aussi le neveu du navigateur Jacques-Yves Le Toumelin (1920-2009), le frère de la poétesse et écrivaine Ève Ricard (née en 1948), et le demi-frère du haut fonctionnaire Nicolas Revel (né en 1966, fils de la journaliste Claude Sarraute). En 2000, il fonde l'association humanitaire Karuna-Shechen. Depuis cette même année, il fait partie du Mind and Life Institute, association qui facilite les rencontres entre la science et le bouddhisme.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 476: Pour l'anecdote, Jean-François Revel (Ricard, de son vrai nom), est le père du bouddhiste Matthieu Ricard. Claude Sarraute est donc la belle-mère du célèbre moine tibétain, interprète du dalaï-lama.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 480: Les Grosses Têtes French pronunciation: ​[le ɡʁos tɛt]; is a daily comedy radio programme on the French language RTL radio network. Broadcasted since 1 April 1977, the current host since 2014 is Laurent Ruquier. Presently broadcast from 15:30 to 18:00 in France and Belgium this show has several regular segments.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 539: Someone very insecure about who they are that they must at all times appear to be 'edgy' with shock value in order to stay relevant. This often means someone who thinks excessive violence and guns are cool, plays way too much GTA and goes out of their way to be an annoying hipster douchebag, often excusing their pretty disgusting selfish behaviour and toxic conceited attitudes by quoting "Beyond Good and Evil" by Neitzsche. They will also find other Edgelords to create cliques with in order to maintain their comfortable Groupthink dynamics and will malign those who do not share their miserable hipster world view.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 597: Deepak Chopra vakuuttaa, että kaikki tapahtuu yhtä helposti kuin lapsen elimien kehitys. Narsistille on vanheneminenkin narsistinen loukkaus. Ihan suututtaa tää nuokkuva ja nahistunut kukkanen. Sitä ei enää suorista tajunnankaan virtapiikki. Ei edes oleskelu luonnossa ja lasten parissa. Siihen ei saa eloa lukemalla henkistä kirjallisuutta, ei käymällä museoissa eikä konserteissa. On tiedostettava, että meillä oli vain 1 elämä, ja siitä on nyt paine karannut. Tätä ei kannata yrittääkään ymmärtää järjen avulla.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 741: Psykodynaamisessa ja psykoanalyyttisessa terapiassa psykoterapeutti antaa tilaa asiakkaan omalle pohdinnalle. Hoidon keinona painottuu keskustelu ja terapeuttinen vuorovaikutus, eivät niinkään kotitehtävät tai harjoitukset. Elämänhistorian läpikäyminen ja sen vaikutuksen ymmärtäminen nykyhetkeen on keskeinen osa työskentelyä. Nää on just niitä pilakuvien sohvapotilaita jotka jaanaavat terapeutin nukkuessa tai ratkoessa ristisanoja.
    xxx/ellauri126.html on line 816: Esimerkiksi "aikuisten oikeesti", Ari Koivunen ja Antti Tuisku, besserwisserit, CD-koteloiden päällä oleva muovi, coverbiisit, Crocsit, Danny, dieetit, diesel- ja bensakoneiden vertailu, englanninkieliset tittelit, esimiehet ja alaiset, Espanjan eläkeläiset, fläppitaulut, laserosoittimet ja kaksipuolinen teippi, herätyskellon torkuttaminen, hikeä ozaliinaan pyyhkivät läskit, "hätätilassa riko lasi" vasarat, inttijutut, izensä ezijät, jatko-osat, jenkkakahvat, johdot, joululahjojen ostaminen, jouluvalot kesäkuussa, julkinen nenänkaivuu, juopon tuuri, juuri sinä: heitä tämä kirja vittuun ja mene töihin, jälkiviisastelijat, jäätelöauto, "kannettavat" tietokoneet, kirkollisvero, kiroileva siili, KOKO VIESTIN CAPS LOCK POHJASSA KIRJOITTAVAT URPOT, kotiteatteriurpot, kylmä kala -kättelijät, kännykkäkotelot vyöllä, käsityöblogit, liian ylös nostetut housut, liito-oravat, Markkuliitto, marttyyrit, metrilaku, miljoonat kaukosäätimet ei vehkeisiin, mukafiksut pellehermannit, jotka viittaavat itseensä sanalla allekirjoittanut, naaman kiilto reissujen jälkeen, Nico Rosberg, "niimpä", näppäinäänet, Näsinneula, ohuen ohuet leikkeleet, paperiprosessimiehet, peltipoliisin välähdys, penkiltä vitusti nostajat, perusjurpot hississä, pihatalkoot ja yhtiökokoukset, pirteät radiojuontajat, pissikset, projektit, puheluiden vitun ärsyttävät lopetusrutiinit, "RE Vs: vs: VS. RE Terve!", "Ruuhka-Suomi", se, että "sanos muuta" ja "Älä muuta sano" tarkoittavat samaa, se, kun on "ihmisiä liikeellä", painukaa vittuun! seniilit, debiilit ja gerbiilit, sisäisesti kauniit ihmiset, suomenruotsalaiset, teekkarit, teinityttöjen laihdutus, tietokoneen uudelleen käynnistäminen AINA kun tekee jotain, tsätit, turistit, tusinajulkkikset, TV Shop, TVstä tuttu, tyttöystävät, jotka puristelevat poikaystävänsä finnejä, tyypit, joiden on pakko sanoa joka asiaan jotakin, tyypit, jotka luulevat, että parisuhde paranee, kun otetaan koira tai hankitaan kakara, tyypit, jotka soittavat miljoona kertaa junasta, vaikka puhelu katkeaa heti, "vanha ällä", Venäjä, vesipullot, viinaa kannattaa hakea laivalta-matemaatikot.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 51: Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest is an approximately 3,800-acre tract of publicly owned virgin forest in Graham County, North Carolina, named in memory of poet Joyce Kilmer (1886–1918), best known for his poem "Trees". Kilmer is most remembered for "Trees", which has been the subject of frequent parodies and references in popular culture. Kilmer's work is often disparaged by critics and dismissed by scholars as being too simple and overly sentimental, and that his style was far too traditional and even archaic.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 52: Despite this, the popular appeal of "Trees" has contributed to its endurance. Literary critic Guy Davenport considers it "the one poem known by practically everybody".
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 60: However, Kilmer's eldest son, Kenton, declares that the poem does not apply to any one tree—that it could apply equally to any. "Trees" was written in an upstairs bedroom at the family's home in Mahwah, New Jersey, that "looked out down a hill, on our well-wooded lawn". Kenton Kilmer stated that while his father was "widely known for his affection for trees, his affection was certainly not sentimental—the most distinguished feature of Kilmer's property was a colossal woodpile outside his home". The house stood in the middle of a forest and what lawn it possessed was obtained only after Kilmer had spent months of weekend toil in chopping down trees, pulling up stumps, and splitting logs. Kilmer's neighbors had difficulty in believing that a man who could do that could also be a poet.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 67: It was dedicated to his wife's mother, Mrs. Henry Mills Alden, who was endeared to all her family. Another mother and son not in law video? Kilmer's poetry was influenced by "his strong religious faith and dedication to the natural beauty of the world."
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 112: When Nabokov died in 1977, The New York Times hailed him as “a giant in the world of literature.” Two of his novels, “Lolita” and “Pale Fire,” landed on the Modern Library’s 1998 list of the best English novels of the 20th century. His legions of fans regard Nabokov’s failure to win a Nobel Prize as one of the great literary travesties of the 20th century.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 114: Only now, 40 years after his death, are some critics daring to suggest that many of his 18 novels are mediocre at best and that his masterpiece, “Lolita,” is a gruesome celebration of pedophile rape. Moreover the cherubic writer known to us from famous Life magazine photo shoots, jauntily brandishing his butterfly net in the Tetons or the Alps, proves to be a nasty piece of work. Distasteful people can do wonderful work — Pablo Picasso was no walk in the park — but their art doesn’t excuse their obnoxious behavior.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 116: There are currently five scholarly journals devoted to Nabokov studies. His allusive style and trilingual (English, French, Russian) wordplay are catnip for academics, who endlessly parse challenging texts like “Pale Fire” — a novel in verse, followed by obscurantist commentary — finding new apercus tailor-made for small-journal publication. Nabokov’s apotheosis in academe is quite ironical, because he and his close friend, the literary critic Edmund Wilson, shared an icy disdain for the ivory tower. They viewed universities as ATMs, handy because there were so many of them, and because they were flush with cash. Nabokov, who arrived in the United States penniless in 1940, had to rely on teaching assignments at Wellesley and Cornell to feed his family for 15 years. The moment “Lolita” made him financially independent, he fled Cornell for Switzerland and never set foot in a classroom again.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 120: In his lifetime, Nabokov received many contrary and often puzzled reviews. The Hollywood producer Robert Evans famously flew to Switzerland in 1968 to read an advance copy of the novel “Ada” in one day. “It was torture,” he recalled. Dwight Macdonald hated “Pale Fire” on behalf of Partisan Review, calling it “unreadable . . . too clever by half . . . Philistine . . . false” — and he hadn’t even finished his first paragraph!
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 126: Rebecca Solnit, for instance, wrote a cringe-inducing and hilarious essay, “Men Explain Lolita to Me,” including these lines: “A nice liberal man came along and explained to me this book was actually an allegory as though I hadn’t thought of that yet. It is, and it’s also a novel about a big old guy violating a spindly child over and over and over. Then she weeps.”
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 128: I’m a “Lolita” fan, but let’s face it, Solnit is right: This is a sprightly little tale about the serial rape of an unwilling or indifferent 12-year-old, embraced and promoted by the male literary establishment.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 131: The constant accrual of money and fame reinforced his certainty of his own genius, which he was never shy about proclaiming. “I think like a genius” are the first five words of his 1973 collection of interviews and essay, “Strong Opinions.”
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 132: Dostoyevsky, Nabokov told anyone who would listen, was “a third-rate writer and his fame is incomprehensible.” He called Henry James “that pale porpoise.” Philip Roth? “Farcical.” Norman Mailer? “I detest everything that he stands for.” T. S. Eliot and Thomas Mann were “fakes.” When his friend Wilson suggested that he include Jane Austen in his Cornell survey course on European literature, Nabokov responded, “I dislike Jane [Austen] and am prejudiced, in fact, against all women writers.” Leo Tolstoy and Nikolai Gogol: da. Everybody else: nyet.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 134: Nabokov’s attacks on his fellow Russian novelist Boris Pasternak were anything but amusing. The moment that Pasternak won the Nobel Prize for “Doctor Zhivago” in 1958, Nabokov waged a bitter, personal campaign against Pasternak, a nonstop stream of vitriol.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 140: This chapter gives a brief history of the émigré travelogue in and about America from Alexis de Tocqueville to Simone de Beauvoir, by way of introducing the four authors studied in this book: Vladimir Nabokov, Robert Frank, Alfred Hitchcock and Wim Wenders. Elsa Court argues that the outsider’s perspective has shaped representations of modern America through restless mobility, drawing a portrait of the modern highway shaped by the needs and cravings of the motorist. In the context of mobilities studies’ recent embrace of the humanities, Court makes an important case for the re-examination of the fixed places designed to facilitate motion—motel, gasoline station, roadside restaurant, as well as signage and memorials—and the roadside’s redesignation from so-called non-place to modern American topos.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 226: Oma auto kazotaan työnhaussa eduxi. Seksityöläinen Anna Roininen kauhistui, kun oli menettää elantonsa Onlyfansin pornokiellon takia: "Sama asia kuin McDonald's lakkaisi myymästä hampurilaisia". Tai Taco Bell tacoja maailman nälkää näkeville Heidi Montagin levittäessä mallixi tacoa.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 239: Humbert's first lay Annabelle refers to Egar Allan Poe‘s (1809-1849) poem « Annabel Lee« , and indeed, the beginning of « Lolita » is full of references to this work. This famous American author was in love with Virginia Clemm, a thirteen years old girl. Nabokov was a fervent lepidopterist, a specialist of butterflies. Miten kukaan voi olla polttavasti innostunut voikärpäsistä? Kai kun sen mielestä oli huisin kivaa piikittää perhosten alaruumiita.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 242: He soon met the family of the new dean, Henry Liddell (1811–1898) who was married to Lorina Reeve (1825-1910). It was the beginning of a long relationship with the Liddell family. It is precisely on April 25, 1856 that he saw for the first time Alice Pleasance Liddell (May 4, 1852 – November 16, 1934), that would become his favorite Liddell girl. He was quite fond of photography and he often photographed the three Liddell sisters (among the many photographs he took in his life, there is a particularly important number of little girls). He also went several times on a boat trip on the Thames with the girls to pick-nick, on which occasion he would tell a story, generally improvised to amuse the girls.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 247: The relationship with the Liddell family stopped suddenly in 1863. Jotain nähtävästi ilmeni. In the year 1880, the reverend Dodgson, up to then a fervent amateur of photography suddenly forgot his passion. 1880 is the year Alice Liddell married and became Mrs Hargreaves. In 1881, he left Oxford and went in a girl’s school to teach logics. He saw Alice Liddell for the last time on November 1, 1888.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 249: The fact that Alice’s mother burnt all the letters Lewis Carroll had sent to the little girl, tends to prove she considered his relationship with her daughter more than ambiguous as well.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 252: 1952 is a capital year in the novel and the number 52 is omnipresent and thus loaded with a mysterious meaning in the mind of Nabokov, in the context of this novel. It must be a central symbolic element in the Lolita’s riddle. Se oli hyvä vuosi muutenkin. « Pierre Point in Melville Sound » (p.33 TAL) was a reference to « Pierre or the Ambiguities » a Novel by Herman Melville (1819-1891; notice the 19/91) published in 1852. «brun adolescent (…) se tordre-oh Baudelaire! » (p.162 TAL): Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867 was one of the most famous French poet who translated Edgar A. Poe in French). A part of « Le Crépuscule du Matin » (1852). Se tordre tarkoittanee käteenvetoa. Humbert refering to the hunchbacked hoary black groom at the « Enchanted Hunters » Hotel: « Handed over to uncle Tom » (p.118 TAL): « Uncle Tom’s Cabin » by Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811-1896) is from 1852. Ehm… the list is non-negligible.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 254: The mention (p.289 TAL) of the case abduction and rape of the 11 years old Florence Sally Horner by a 50 years old man. In 1948, the 11-year-old Horner stole a 5-cent notebook from a store in Camden, New Jersey. Frank La Salle, a 50-year-old mechanic, caught her stealing, told her that he was an FBI agent, and threatened to send her to « a place for girls like you« . Then he abducted the girl and spent 21 months traveling with her over different American states and raping her. Florence Horner died in a car accident (p.288 TAL, « a routine highway accident«) near Woodbine, New Jersey, in 1952. It seems clear that the case inspired partly « Lolita » (even though this theme existed long before in Nabokov’s works (see for instance his 1939 work « Volshebnik » (i.e. « The Enchanter« ))).
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 256: Hegel (mentioned in p.259 TAL; he married in 1811 and his sister Christian Luise died in 1832) was fascinated by Goethe (and also by Jean-jacques Rousseau (allusion to him in p. TAL « Jean-jacques Humbert« ) and the French Revolution). Goethe published a « Theory of Colours » concerning the light spectrum (a hint, more about this in the final conclusion part). There are recurrent mentions of Goethe in Freud‘s writings. Schopenhauer cited Goethe’s novel « Wilhelm Meister’s Apprenticeship » as one of the four greatest novels ever written, along with « Tristram Shandy« , « La Nouvelle Heloïse« , and « Don Quixote« .
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 280: The female figure in the Starbucks logo has been likened to a Melusine. Notice the fork innovation in the tail. In Czech the word meluzína refers to wailing wind, usually in the chimney. This is a reference to the wailing Melusine looking forward to having children.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 282: The most famous literary version of Melusine tales, that of Jean d'Arras, compiled about 1382–1394, was worked into a collection of "spinning yarns" as told by ladies at their spinning coudrette (coulrette (in French)). He wrote The Romans of Partenay or of Lusignen: Otherwise known as the Tale of Melusine, giving source and historical notes, dates and background of the story. Another version, Chronique de la princesse (Chronicle of the Princess). tells how in the time of the Crusades, Elynas, the King of Albany (an old name for Scotland or Alba), went hunting one day and came across a beautiful lady in the forest. She was Pressyne, mother of Melusine. He persuaded her to marry him but she agreed, only on the promise—for there is often a hard and fatal condition attached to any pairing of fay and mortal—that he must not enter her chamber when she birthed or bathed her children. She gave birth to triplets. When he violated this taboo, Pressyne left the kingdom, together with her three daughters, and traveled to the lost Isle of Avalon.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 284: The three girls (Liddellin tytöt!) —Melusine, Melior, and Palatyne—grew up in Avalon. On their fifteenth birthday, Melusine, the eldest, asked why they had been taken to Avalon. Upon hearing of their father's broken promise, Melusine sought revenge. She and her sisters captured Elynas and locked him, with his riches, in a mountain. Pressyne became enraged when she learned what the girls had done, and punished them for their disrespect to their father. Melusine was condemned to take the form of a serpent from the waist down every Saturday. In other stories, she takes on the form of a mermaid.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 286: Raymond of Poitou came across Melusine in a forest of Coulombiers in Poitou in France, and proposed marriage. Just as her mother had done, she laid a condition: that he must never enter her chamber on a Saturday. He broke the promise and saw her in the form of a part-woman, part-serpent, but she forgave him. When, during a disagreement, he called her a "serpent" in front of his court, she assumed the form of a dragon, provided him with two magic rings, and flew off, never to return.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 297: Stratton-Porter wrote several best-selling novels in addition to columns for national magazines, such as McCall's and Good Housekeeping, among others. Her novels have been translated into more than twenty languages, including Braille, and at their peak in the 1910s attracted an estimated 50 million readers. Eight of her novels, including A Girl of the Limberlost, were adapted into moving pictures. Stratton-Porter was also the subject of a one-woman play, A Song of the Wilderness. Two of her former homes in Indiana are state historic sites, the Limberlost State Historical Site in Geneva and the Gene Stratton-Porter State Historic Site on Sylvan Lake, near Rome City, Indiana.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 346: Viisi hahmoa kehittyy melko ankarasti : Katharine Cumstick, Margaret Sinton, Philip Ammon, Edith Carr ja Elorna itse. Elorna kasvaa tottelevaisesta, joskin heikosti kauhistuvasta, teini-ikäisestä lukion tytöstä vahvaksi naiseksi, joka luottaa omiin kykyihinsä. Hän vaarantaa toivotun sitoutumisensa Philip Ammoniin antaakseen Edith Carrille kaikki mahdollisuudet mennä naimisiin hänen kanssaan. Katharine Cumstick on aina halveksinut ja laiminlyönyt tyttärensä Elornaa. Aluksi hän näyttää olevan paha äiti, mutta pian osoittautuu osoittavan hyvää huumorintajua ja rakkautta lukemiseen, etenkin Mark Twainin teoksia. Hän alkaa muuttua, kun Elorna muuttuu, yksinkertaisesti kypsymällä.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 394: He likes a woman that triggers his hero instinct.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 432: Prosper Mérimée, né le 28 septembre 1803 à Paris et mort le 23 septembre 1870 à Cannes, est un écrivain, historien et archéologue français.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 447: Durante un viaje por el sur de España, el narrador (un arqueólogo francés) conoce a Don José Lizarrabengoa, un exmilitar de origen navarro (de Elizondo, en Baztán). Don José le cuenta una historia entretenida: sus amores con Carmen (de Echalar), una gitana sensual que se cruzó por su camino, lo apartó del Ejército y lo arrastró hacia el delito, convirtiéndolo en un bandido. Don José, ciego de amor por Carmen, toleró que estuviera casada con un bandolero llamado «El Tuerto», a cuya banda Don José se unió y con el que colaboró en emboscadas y crímenes hasta que por celos lo desafió y mató en una pelea de cuchillos.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 484: In 1996, two years before the main action of the novel, Silk is accused of racism by two African-American students over his use of the word spooks, using the term as he wonders aloud over their having missed all his classes for the first five weeks of the semester ("Does anyone know these people? Do they exist or are they spooks?" - he has never seen these students, and has no idea they are African-American) rather than in the racially derogatory sense. The uproar leads to Silk's resignation. Soon after, his wife Iris dies of a stroke, which Silk feels is caused by the stress of his being forced out of the college.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 488: Shortly after being let go from the college, Silk begins a relationship with Faunia Farley, a 34-year-old local woman who works as a janitor at the college and is believed (falsely, as it turns out) to be illiterate, further cementing his status as a pariah among the Athena faculty and student body.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 492: In the summer of 1998, 71-year-old Silk approaches Zuckerman, hoping that the writer will lend his talents to his case against the college. Zuckerman is uninterested, but the two begin a brief friendship and Silk tells him his life story, beginning with his adolescence in Essex County, New Jersey. Zuckerman reveals to the reader that Silk is secretly a light-skinned African-American who has been "passing" as a Jew since a stint in the Navy during World War II. Silk completes graduate school at New York University, marries a Jewish woman (Iris) and has four children, none of whom are aware of their father's real ancestry.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 500: 9. Late in the novel, Nathan discovers that Faunia had kept a diary and that “the illiteracy had been an act, something she decided her situation demanded” [p. 297]. Why did Faunia feign illiteracy? Was there any reason why she chose this flaw in lieu of others? What are the implications of her secret?
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 504: 13. Nathan interprets Coleman’s choosing to reject his past and create a new identity for himself as “the drama that underlies America’s story, the high drama that is upping and leaving—and the energy and cruelty that rapturous drive demands,” whereas Walter thinks of his brother as a “calculating liar,” a “heartless son,” and a “traitor to his race” [p. 342]. Which of these views seems closer to the truth? Are they both legitimate? What is Ernestine’s position?
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 515: Gratiano is a friend of Bassanio in The Merchant of Venice. A great talker, he is almost impossible to shut up, and can be unmannerly, to the extent that Bassanio only allows him to accompany his trip to Belmont on condition that he keep his big trap shut.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 519: He returns to Venice with Bassanio on his mission to rescue Antonio, and gives his tongue free rein during the trial, spitting out invective against Shylock, and then mercilessly mocking him once the carpet is pulled out from under
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 522: Like Bassanio, he is willing to prefer Antonio’s life to his newly-acquired wife’s. The law-clerk manages to convince him to give his wedding ring as a gift of thanks in return, which leads to some problems on his return to Belmont, as he had sworn to Nerissa that he would never remove it. He gives away that Bassanio has done much the same.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 564: And from this chasm, with ceaseless turmoil seething, Ja tähän rotkoon kovasti kohisten,
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 565: As if this earth in fast thick pants were breathing, Ikäänkuin paxut päällihousut tohisten,
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 576: And ’mid this tumult Kubla heard from far Ja keskellä kovaa meuhkaa Kupla tota
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 598: His flashing eyes, his floating hair! Sen vilkkuluomet, sen unduloiva pää!
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 614: Samuel Taylor Coleridge is the premier poet-critic of modern English tradition, distinguished for the scope and influence of his thinking about literature rather than for his innovative verse. Active in the wake of the French Revolution as a dissenting pamphleteer and lay preacher, he...
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 618: A person from Porlock was an unwelcome visitor to Samuel Taylor Coleridge during his composition of the poem Kubla Khan in 1797. Coleridge claimed to have perceived the entire course of the poem in an opiatic dream, but was interrupted by this visitor from Porlock while in the process of writing it. Kubla Khan, only 54 lines long, was never completed. Thus "person from Porlock", "man from Porlock", or just "Porlock" are literary allusions to unwanted intruders who disrupt inspired creativity.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 620: In 1797, Coleridge was living at Nether Stowey, a village in the foothills of the Quantocks. However, due to ill health, he had "retired to a lonely farm house between Porlock and Lynton, on the Exmoor confines of Somerset and Devonshire". It is unclear whether the interruption took place at Culbone Parsonage (Culbone, penisluu, hehe) or at Ash Farm. (Ass farm, puofarmi, hehe.) Jossain sillä välillä takuulla. He described the incident in his first publication of the poem, writing about himself in the third person:
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 622: On awakening he appeared to himself to have a distinct recollection of the whole, and taking his pen, ink, and paper, instantly and eagerly wrote down the lines that are here preserved. At this moment he was unfortunately called out by a person on business from Porlock, and detained by him above an hour, and on his return to his room, found, to his no small surprise and mortification, that though he still retained some vague and dim recollection of the general purport of the vision, yet, with the exception of some eight or ten scattered lines and images, all the rest had passed away like the images on the surface of a stream into which a stone has been cast, but, alas! without the after restoration of the latter!
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 625: It has been suggested by Admiral Schneider (in Coleridge, Opium and "Kubla Khan", University of Chicago Press, 1953), among others, that this prologue, as well as the person from Porlock, was fictional and intended as a credible smokescreen of the poem's apparent lecherous intent when published. It was good old clubfooted Byron that convinced Coleridge to publish it in 1816. The poet Stevie Smith also suggested this view in one of her own poems, saying "the truth is I think, he had already stuck it in there".
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 627: If the Porlock interruption was a fiction, it would parallel the famous "letter from a friend" that interrupts Chapter XIII of Coleridge's Biographia Literaria just as he was beginning a 100-page exposition of the nature of the imagination. It was admitted much later that the "friend" was the author himself. In that case, the invented letter solved the problem that Coleridge found little receptiveness for his philosophy in the England of that time.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 645: Klein’s insistence on viewing aggression as an important force in its own right when analyzing children led her into conflict with Freud’s own daughter, Anna Freud, who was one of the other prominent child psychotherapists in continental Europe but who became moved to London in 1938 where Klein had been working for several years. Many controversies arose out of this conflict, and these are often referred to as controversial debates. In reality, the semitic hags were in one another's hairs. Lähde:
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 659: About Me: At the age of 17 and a half, I performed his first Hypnosis without taking any course. This would forever mark his life as a physician and his clinical approach to his patients. After graduating in medicine, I practiced hospital medicine.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 685: Operation Bagration, June-August 1944. The greatest offensive in world history, it eventually involved 3.5 million men, 7,000 tanks, and 9,000 aircraft. It was an overwhelming Soviet victory and set the stage for the final assault on Nazi Germany.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 686: Stalin was asked to give a name to this offensive and he chose Bagration, after a fellow Georgian who had died fighting Napoleon at the Battle of Borodino in 1812.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 709: Endymion tarkottanee puolisukeltajaa. Kuuhullu astronomi tai sit paimen vaan. Astronomi mainitaan merenneitopätkässsä. Octopussy's garden in the waves. The 4th century Babylonian god of the sea was known as Oannes who was portrayed as a man with a fish tail in place of legs. Oannes would appear out of the ocean every day as a fish-human creature to share his wisdom with the people along the Persian Gulf, then return to the sea at night. There was also Atargatis, a Syrian moon and sea goddess, her story tells us that after causing the death of her mortal lover she fled to the sea and took the form of a woman above the waist and a fish below, for this reason she became known as a mermaid goddess. During medieval times mermaids were considered as matter-of-factly alongside other aquatic animals, such as whales and dolphins. The goddess Venus is sometimes depicted as a mermaid, being born from a giant clam shell.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 711: Endymion" is a poem by John Keats first published in 1818 by Taylor and Hessey of Fleet Street in London. John Keats dedicated this poem to the late poet Thomas Chatterton. Thomas Chatterton (20 November 1752 – 24 August 1770) was an English poet whose precocious talents ended in suicide at age 17. He was an influence on Romantic artists of the period such as Shelley, Keats, Wordsworth and Coleridge. Chatterton was born in Bristol where the office of sexton of St Mary Redcliffe had long been held by the Chatterton family. The poet's father, also named Thomas Chatterton, was a musician, a poet, a numismatist, and a dabbler in the occult. Tom got one over on his uncle the sexton: han var sjutton när han dog.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 713: Chatterton soon conceived the romance of Thomas Rowley, an imaginary monk of the 15th century, and adopted for himself the pseudonym Thomas Rowley for poetry and history. According to psychoanalyst Louise J. Kaplan, his being fatherless played a great role in his imposturous creation of Rowley. The development of his masculine identity was held back by the fact that he was raised by two women: his mother Sarah and his sister Mary.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 715: Thomas Rowley (1721–1796) was a famous poet of Vermont, known both as the spokesman for Ethan Allen and dubbed “The Bard of the Green Mountains.” During his lifetime and before the American Revolution, his poetry gained the reputation with the catchphrase of "Setting the Balls on Fire." Rowley's poetry actually focused not only on politics, but also on the pleasantness and rustic nature of pioneer life, with humor and witty observations. For example, in another poetic inventory of his "estate", he sums up that he has virtually nothing, but still he was independent and happy.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 719: However, Endymion, the "brain-sick shepherd-prince" of Mt. Latmos, is in a trancelike state, and not participating in their discourse. His sister, Peona (Fanny), takes him away and brings him to her resting place where he sleeps. After he wakes, he tells Peona of his encounter with Cynthia (Fanny B.), and how much he loved her. The poem is divided into four books, each approximately 1,000 lines long. TLDR, quips Peona. 
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 721: Book I gives Endymion's account of his dreams and experiences, as related to Peona, which provides the background for the rest of the poem. In Book II, Endymion ventures into the underworld in search of his love. He encounters Adonis and Venus—a pairing of mortal and immortal—apparently foreshadowing a similar destiny for the mortal Endymion and his immortal paramour. Book III reveals Endymion's enduring love, and he begs the Moon not to torment him any longer as he journeys through a watery void on the sea floor. There he meets Glaucus, freeing the god from a thousand years of imprisonment by the witch Circe. Book IV, "And so he groan'd, as one by beauty slain."
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 723: Anyway, Endymion falls in love with a beautiful Indian maiden. Both ride winged black steeds to Mount Olympus where Cynthia awaits, only for Endymion to forsake the goddess for his new, mortal, love. Endymion and the Indian girl return to earth, the latter saying she cannot be his love. He is miserable, 'til quite suddenly he comes upon the Indian maiden again and she reveals that she is in fact Cynthia. She then tells him of how she tried to forget him, to move on, but that in the end, "'There is not one,/ No, no, not one/ But thee.'"
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 728: %This poem is quoted by Monsieur Verdoux in Charlie Chaplin's homo film, before committing a loony murder. "Our feet were soft in flowers...". Hänen viimeisiksi sanoikseen jäävät: ”En olekaan koskaan maistanut rommia!”, kun vankilanjohtaja tarjoaa hänelle viimeistä lasillista ennen giljotiiniin vientiä. Loppukuvaksi jää mielikuva kyynisestä ja mitään katumattomasta miehestä, joka menee kuolemaan koska kaikkien on kuoltava joskus. Se että kuolema tulee mestaamalla ja tuomiona murhista, näyttää olevan hänelle aivan samantekevää.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 736: Fanny Brawne met Keats, who was her neighbour in Hampstead, at the beginning of his brief period of intense creative activity in 1818. Although his first written impressions of Brawne were quite critical, his imagination seems to have turned her into the goddess-figure he needed to worship, as expressed in Endymion, and scholars have acknowledged her as his muse. On se vähän intiaanin näköinen.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 738: At eighteen, Fanny Brawne “was small, her eyes were blue and often enhanced by blue ribbons in her brown hair; her mouth expressed determination and a sense of humour and her smile was disarming. She was not conventionally beautiful: her nose was a little too aquiline, her face too pale and thin (some called it sallow). But she knew the value of elegance; velvet hats and muslin bonnets, crêpe hats with argus feathers, straw hats embellished with grapes and tartan ribbons: Fanny noticed them all as they came from Paris. She could answer, at a moment’s notice, any question on historical costume. ... Fanny enjoyed music. ... She was an eager politician, fiery in discussion; she was a voluminous reader. ... Indeed, books were her favourite topic of conversation”.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 739: Shall I give you Miss Brawn? She is about my height—with a fine style of countenance of the lengthen'd sort—she wants sentiment in every feature—she manages to make her hair look well—her nostrills are fine—though a little painful—her mouth is bad and good—her Profil is better than her full-face which indeed is not full but pale and thin without showing any bone—Her shape is very graceful and so are her movements—her Arms are good her hands badish—her feet tolerable—she is not seventeen—but she is ignorant—monstrous in her behaviour flying out in all directions, calling people such names—that I was forced lately to make use of the term Minx—this is I think not from any innate vice but from a penchant she has for acting stylishly. I am however tired of such style and shall decline any more of it".
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 743: Endymion received scathing criticism after its release, and Keats himself noted its diffuse and unappealing style. Keats did not regret writing it, as he likened the process to leaping into the ocean to become more acquainted with his surroundings; in a poem to J. A. Hessey, he expressed that "I was never afraid of failure; for I would sooner fail than not be among the greatest." However, he did feel regret in its publishing, saying "it is not without a feeling of regret that I make it public." Not all critics disliked the work. eg. the poet Thomas Hood.  Henry Morley said, "The song of Endymion throbs throughout with a noble poet's sense of all that his art means for him. What mechanical defects there are in it may even serve to quicken our sense of the youth and freshness of this voice of aspiration." Meaning: Dig it mon. Endymionin jälkeen Keaz kommentoi sen vastaanottoa seuraavasti.
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 759: Would, with his maid Marian, Kuin Robin Hoodin sankarit ja Marian,
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 778: Cockney poet Keats was compared to Milton who lived and worked at London's Mermaid Tavern. Coincidentally, his father, Thomas worked as a barman in London's Hoop and Swan Pub until passing in 1804. It is clear John Keats is making a universal statement about poets and the message is associated to lively pub life and drink. The phrase, "new old sign," indicates he recognizes similarities between himself and Milton. Milton vanha kuu pois pyllisti, uusvanha nousee tilalle. Was he a sodomite like Little John? Was he also one of the men in tights?
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 841: And this is why I sojourn here Ja sixmä oleilen nyt täällä
    xxx/ellauri127.html on line 919: The red-breast whistles from a garden-croft; Tyhmä punarinta viheltelee majan suunnalta,
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 105: Vaakku ilmeisesti piti vastustelevista runotytöistä. Sama predilektio näkyy mom and son videoissa: "mami" pyristelee vastaan alussa, mutta panee vastaan tarmokkaasti loppupeleissä. Haista-paska kappalainen Capellanus näyttää olleen Vaakun lemppareita. Ruma Honoré de Balzac oli kanssa kova panomies, tosin se sai työntää vasta maxettuaan runsaasti. Paul Bourget oli varsinainen pahis, kuten jo tiedetään. Näissä hanuissa on hurjasti narsisteja. Chardonne eli puteli-Jaakko oli Vaakun poliittinen virkaveli. Cicero oli tyhmä snobi kikhernekauppias. Disraeli Tears oli poikkeuxellisesti hölmö jutku. Dosto komppaa Catullusta Karamazoveissa tän suositun vihaava rakkaus-aiheen suhteen. Duclos näyttää olleen paskiainen miehexeen. Hemmetin paljon on näitä koiraan lisääntymisstrategia-aiheita, missä rakkautta piisaa just niin kauan että pääsee luukulle, ja sitten alkaa jo huooh ikävystyttää. Vaakulla on vitun vähän ylipäänsä naisia muutakuin puheenaiheena. Joubert on nyysinyt ton "ei 2x samaa" penseen ihailemaltaan Rochefoucauldilta (tai vastoin päin). Vaakulla ja Tommilla on samojakin töräyxiä respektiivisissä kokoelmissa. Nietschen penseet naimisesta on niin heikkoja ettei viizi edes mainita. Sen kokemuxet siitä oli aika rajallisia. Mitä jää viivan alle kun Shawin supistus on tehty? Minielefantin kärsä. Tosta tottumuxen osuudesta rakkaudessa näyttää M/F töräyttäjät ottavan ihan vastakkaisia kantoja. Koiraiden kannalta on toi uutuudenviehätys tietty tärkeä. Jokainen uusi reikä on uusi tilaisuus. Riippumahainen Ball-sack ei kyllä tiennytkään mitään häveliäisyydestä. Sen Contes drolatiques on pitkästyttävä. Disdraeli saa lisää haukkuja albumissa 243.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 125: Benjamin Disraeli, 1st Earl of Beaconsfield KG PC FRS (21 December 1804 – 19 April 1881) was a British statesman and Conservative politician who twice served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He played a central role in the creation of the modern Conservative Party, defining its policies and its broad outreach. Disraeli is remembered for his influential voice in world affairs, his political battles with the Liberal Party leader William Ewart Gladstone, and his one-nation conservatism or "Tory democracy". He made the Conservatives the party most identified with the glory and power of the British Empire. He is the only British prime minister to have been of Jewish birth. He was also a novelist, publishing works of fiction even as prime minister.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 126: Disraeli was born in Bloomsbury, then a part of Middlesex. His father left Judaism after a dispute at his synagogue; young Benjamin became an Anglican at the age of 12. After several unsuccessful attempts, Disraeli entered the House of Commons in 1837.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 128: He maintained a close friendship with Queen Victoria, who in 1876 elevated him to Earl of Beaconsfield. Disraeli´s second term was dominated by the Eastern Question—the slow decay of the Ottoman Empire and the desire of other European powers, such as Russia, to gain at its expense. Disraeli arranged for the British to purchase a major interest in the Suez Canal Company in Egypt. In 1878, faced with Russian victories against the Ottomans, he worked at the Congress of Berlin to obtain peace in the Balkans at terms favourable to Britain and unfavourable to Russia, its longstanding enemy. This diplomatic victory over Russia established Disraeli as one of Europe´s leading statesmen.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 130: World events thereafter moved against the Conservatives. Controversial wars in Afghanistan and South Africa undermined his public support. He angered British farmers by refusing to reinstitute the Corn Laws in response to poor harvests and cheap imported grain. With Gladstone conducting a massive speaking campaign, his Liberals defeated Disraeli´s Conservatives at the 1880 general election. In his final months, Disraeli led the Conservatives in Opposition. He had written novels throughout his career, beginning in 1826, and he published his last completed novel, Endymion, shortly before he died at the age of 76. Russell pelkäsi pienenä Gladstonen setää.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 132: Charles Pinot Duclos né à Dinan, le 12 février 1704 et mort à Paris le 26 mars 1772, est un écrivain et historien français.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 135: C’était, dit Jean-Jacques Rousseau, « un homme droit et adroit ». « Il faisait profession, écrit La Harpe, d’une franchise brusque qui ne déplaisait point […] Soit habitude, soit dessein, il gardait ce ton même dans la louange et l’on peut juger qu’elle n’y perdait pas. Il avait d’ailleurs un fonds de droiture qui le rendait incapable de plier son opinion ni sa liberté à aucun intérêt ni aucune politique ; et cependant ce ne fut point un obstacle à son avancement, parce qu’il n’offensa jamais l’amour-propre des gens de lettres, et qu’il sut intéresser en sa faveur celui des gens en place. » Duclos avait beaucoup d’esprit et une grande liberté de parole ; on cite de lui nombre de mots heureux.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 140: Freifrau Marie Ebner von Eschenbach (* 13. September 1830 auf Schloss Zdislawitz bei Kremsier in Mähren als Marie Dubský von Třebomyslice; † 12. März 1916 in Wien) war eine mährisch-österreichische Schriftstellerin. Ihre psychologischen Erzählungen gehören zu den bedeutendsten deutschsprachigen Beiträgen des 19. Jahrhunderts in diesem Genre.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 142: John Fletcher (1579–1625) was a Jacobean playwright. Following William Shakespeare as house playwright for the King's Men, he was among the most prolific and influential dramatists of his day; during his lifetime and in the early Restoration, his fame rivalled Shakespeare's. He collaborated on writing plays with Francis Beaumont, and also with Shakespeare on two plays.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 143: Though his reputation has declined since, Fletcher remains an important transitional figure between the Elizabethan popular tradition and the popular drama of the Restoration.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 153: Walter "Savage" Landor (1775–1864) oli englantilainen kirjailija. Hän oli niin kiivasluontoinen että hänet erotettiin sekä Rugbyn koulusta että myöhemmin Oxfordin yliopistosta. Hän siirtyi Lontooseen, missä hän julkaisi englannin ja latinan kielellä ensimmäiset runoelmansa. Landorin ensimmäinen laajahko runoteos oli Gebir (1798). Tässä, kuten Landorin myöhemmissäkin runoissa, huomaa järvikoulun ja varsinkin Byronin ällöömän Robert Southeyn vaikutusta. Landorin draamat Count Julian (1811), Andrea of Hungary ja Giovanni of Naples (1839) eivät menestyneet näyttämöllä, ne olivatkin aivan paskoja. Landor eli ahtaissa taloudellisissa oloissa enimmäkseen Walesissa vuoteen 1805, jolloin hän isänsä kuoltua peri kokonaisen omaisuuden. Hän lähti 1808 Espanjaan taistelemaan ranskalaisia vastaan, värväsi omilla varoillaan soturijoukon ja joutui siksi taas taloudelliseen ahdinkoon. Hän siirtyi 1815 Italiaan, missä hän asui 20 vuotta, loppuiällään taloudellisten huolien rasittamana, joihin hän ilman Robert Browningin apua olisi sortunut. Samoin kuin lordi Byron ja Leigh Hunt, myös Landor oli intohimoinen vapauden (= britti-imperialismin) rakastaja, ja vapauden asialle hän oli valmis uhraamaan omaisuutensa. Landorin pääteos on Imaginary conversations of imaginary literary men and statesmen, jonka kaksi edellistä osaa ilmestyivät 1824 ja kolme jälkimmäistä 1829. Teos on täynnä tekosyvällisiä ajatuksia esitettynä kauniilla, dramaattisesti voimakkaalla, joskaan ei aina helposti tajuttavalla proosatyylillä. Eeva Kilpi on suomentanut osittain runon "On his seventy-fifth birthday" julkaisuun Tätä runoa en unohda. Pertti Niemisen suomentama runo "En käynyt kiistaan, hillizin izeni" on julkaistu kokoelmassa Kuu kultainen terälehti.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 162: Richterin isä oli kansakoulunopettaja, joka toimi myöhemmin Schwarzenbachissa kirkkoherrana. Richterin kouluaikana vuonna 1779 hänen isänsä kuoli ja jätti perheen puille paljaille. Kun Richter kirjoittautui Leipzigin yliopistoon, hänellä oli mukana kirjallinen todistus köyhyydestään. Yksi lukuvuosi teologiaa sai hänet ymmärtämään, ettei hänestä olisi seuraamaan tällä alalla isänsä jalanjäljissä. Richter päätti ruveta kirjailijaksi. Hänen varhaisille kirjallisille tuotoksilleen ei ollut helppo löytää kustantajaa. Ensimmäinen painettu kirja, Grönländische Prozesse, sai kurjat arvostelut ja tuotti tappiota kustantajalle, joka kieltäytyi painamasta kirjasta enempää kuin kaksi osaa. Richterin velkataakka Leipzigissa kävi ylivoimaiseksi, ja hän pakeni takaisin perheensä luo salanimen turvin. Elämä perheen luona tarjosi ehkä pakopaikan velkojain kynsistä, mutta köyhyyden aiheuttama kurjuus oli vastassa sielläkin. Kukaan Richterin veljistä ei osoittanut taipumusta työtekoon, ja yksi heistä teki itsemurhan 1789 perheen viheliäisen rahatilanteen vuoksi. Richter toimi kirjoitustyön ohella vuosina 1790–1794 kotiopettajana Schwarzenbachissa.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 164: Ensimmäinen edes vähän merkittävä kirja on Die unsichtbare Loge ('Näkymätön loosi') ilmestyi 1793. Persoonallisen romaanin kertojana oli ensimmäistä kertaa henkilö nimeltä Jean Paul. Tätä nimeä ei voi suorastaan pitää pseudonyyminä, sillä Richter ei kirjoja julkaistessaan koskaan halunnut suorastaan salata henkilöllisyyttään. Richter julkaisi kirjansa nimellä Jean Paul, mutta tämä oli puhtaan kirjailijanimen sijasta osittain fiktiivinen hahmo hänen romaaneissaan. Monet lukijat, etenkin Richterin naispuoliset ihailijat, uskoivat vilpittömästi, että Richter ja fiktiivinen Jean Paul olivat todella sama henkilö. (Richter oli tylsän porsaan näköinen, onnexi kirjan liepeessä ei siihen aikaan julkaistu kirjailijan kuvia.) Richterin maine kasvoi ja hän sai valtavasti ihailijoita. Matkallaan Weimariin 1796 hän tapasi Johann Wolfgang von Goethen, Friedrich Schillerin, Johann Gottfried Herderin ja monia muita tärkeitä kulttuurivaikuttajia ja muutti kaupunkiin influensserixi itsekin vuonna 1798. Richteristä tuli hyvin kuuluisa, ja legendoja hänen epätoivoisten naisihailijoidensa tempauksista löytyy edelleen elämäkertakirjallisuudesta. Totta lienee ainakin se, että Richterillä oli useita kosijoita ja hän oli kihloissa useita kertoja ennen avioliittoaan Karoline Meyerin kanssa 1801. Vuodesta 1804 Richter ja hänen kolmilapsinen perheensä asuivat Bayreuthissa.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 181: Madame de Staël (/stal/) ou bien Anne-Louise-Germaine Necker, baronne de Staël-Holstein, était une romancière, épistolière et philosophe genevoise et française née le 22 avril 1766 à Paris où elle est morte le 14 juillet 1817. Issue d´une famille de protestants valdo-genevois richissimes, fille du ministre des finances de Louis XVI Jacques Necker, elle est élevée dans un milieu de gens de lettres. Elle épouse, en 1786, le baron Erik Magnus Staël von Holstein, ambassadeur du roi Gustave III de Suède auprès de la cour de France à Versailles. Le couple se séparera en 1800. Devenue baronne de Staël, elle mène une vie sentimentale agitée et entretient en particulier une relation orageuse avec Benjamin Constant, écrivain et homme politique franco-vaudois rencontré en 1794. Entretemps, sa réputation littéraire et intellectuelle s´est affirmée grâce à trois essais philosophiques que sont les Lettres sur les ouvrages et le caractère de Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1788), De l´influence des passions sur le bonheur de l´individu et des nations (1796) et De la littérature considérée dans ses rapports avec les institutions sociales (1800). Favorable à la Révolution française et aux idéaux de 1789 au debut, elle adopte une position critique dès 1791 et ses idées d´une monarchie constitutionnelle la font considérer comme une opposante gênante par les maîtres de la révolution. Malgré le statut de diplomate de son mari, elle doit se réfugier auprès de son père en Suisse à plusieurs reprises. Interdite de séjour sur le sol français par Napoléon Bonaparte qui la considère comme un obstacle à sa politique, elle s´installe en Suisse dans le château familial de Coppet qui sert de lieu principal de rencontres au groupe du même nom, et d´où elle fait paraître Delphine (1802), Corinne ou l´Italie (1807) et De l´Allemagne (1810/1813b). Ses œuvres fictionnelles majeures, dans lesquelles elle représente des femmes victimes des contraintes sociales qui les enchaînent, sont Delphine (1802) et Corinne ou l´Italie (1807).
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 207: Rahel Varnhagen verstand sich nicht als Schriftstellerin im professionellen Sinn und nahm wenig Anteil am Literaturbetrieb, obwohl sie häufig dazu ermuntert wurde. Sie pflegte vor allem die Gattungen Tagebuch (wobei Exzerpte aus Büchern oft zu kritischen Essays ausgebaut wurden), Aphorismus und Brief (rund 6000 Briefe von ihr sind bekannt), seltener Gedichte. Trotzdem gehört sie zu den bedeutendsten Vertreterinnen und Vorbildern der im 19. Jahrhundert aufblühenden Frauenliteratur, die sich nicht nur über Lyrik, Romane, Theaterstücke und Opernlibretti erstreckte, sondern oft kleine, intimere Formen wählte. Der Wert ihres Schreibens resultiert aus der Dokumentation historischer und kultureller Vorgänge, sowie aus brillantem Stil und politischer Weitsicht.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 209: Rahel Varnhagen war im Alter von 61 Jahren verstorben. An ihrer Pflege in den letzten Wochen beteiligte sich Bettina von Arnim, die ihr, freilich ohne Erfolg, eine homöopathische Behandlung empfohlen hatte. Aus Sorge, scheintot beigesetzt zu werden, verfügte sie, nach ihrem Tod 20 Jahre lang in einem Doppelsarg mit Sichtfenstern oberirdisch aufgebahrt zu werden. Der Sarg stand 34 Jahre lang in einer Halle auf dem Friedhofsquartier vor dem Halleschen Tor, bis Rahel Varnhagen von Ense 1867 auf Veranlassung ihrer Nichte Ludmilla Assing neben ihrem neun Jahre zuvor verstorbenen Gatten auf dem Dreifaltigkeitsfriedhof I beigesetzt wurde
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 330: Olisi paljon sanottavaa ellet koko ajan keskeyttäisi silmillä.Chistopher MorleyMFUCK!
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 427: John Barrymore (born John Sidney Blyth; February 14 or 15, 1882 – May 29, 1942) was an American actor on stage, screen and radio. A member of the Drew and Barrymore theatrical families, he initially tried to avoid the stage, and briefly attempted a career as an artist, but appeared on stage together with his father Maurice in 1900, and then his sister Ethel the following year. He began his career in 1903 and first gained attention as a stage actor in light comedy, then high drama, culminating in productions of Justice (1916), Richard III (1920) and Hamlet (1922); his portrayal of Hamlet led to him being called the "living American tragedy".
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 432: Russellin vanhin poika John kärsi vakavasta mielisairaudesta, joka johtui Russellin ja Johnin äidin Doran välisistä riidoista. Myös Johnin vaimo Susan oli mielisairas, ja lopulta Russellista ja Edithistä tuli heidän kolmen tyttärensä huoltajia. Tyttäristä kahdella diagnosoitiin myöhemmin skitsofrenia.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 436: histburl/gif/jennie_lee01c.jpg" style="width:10%;float:right"/>
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 459: Wystan Hugh Auden (/ˈwɪstən ˈhjuː ˈɔːdən/ 21 February 1907 – 29 September 1973) was an Anglo-American poet. Auden´s poetry was noted for its stylistic and technical achievement, its engagement with politics, morals, love, and religion, and its variety in tone, form, and content. Some of his best known poems are about love, such as "Funeral Blues"; on political and social themes, such as "September 1, 1939" and "The Shield of Achilles"; on cultural and psychological themes, such as The Age of Anxiety; and on religious themes such as "For the Time Being" and "Horae Canonicae".
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 460: He was born in York and grew up in and near Birmingham in a professional middle-class family. He attended English independent (or public) schools and studied English at Christ Church, Oxford. After a few months in Berlin in 1928–29, he spent five years (1930–35) teaching in British private preparatory schools, then travelled to Iceland and China to write books about his journeys. In 1939 he moved to the United States and became an American citizen in 1946, retaining his British citizenship. Auden oli homopetteri.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 472: Saarnio väitteli filosofian tohtoriksi 1937, väitöskirja Untersuchungen zur symbolischen Logik I käsitteli merkkien ja merkityssuhteiden logiikkaa. Hän työskenteli Tampereen kaupunginkirjaston johtajana 1939–1940 ja sen jälkeen Helsingin kaupunginkirjaston johtajana 1940–1963. Saarnio toimi myös Helsingin yliopiston logiikan dosenttina 1945–1966 ja hän sai professorin arvonimen 1957. Eläkkeelle jäätyään Saarnio toimi vielä Bonnin yliopiston vierailevana filosofian professorina 1964–1966 ja Helsingin yliopiston teologisen tiedekunnan filosofian historian luennoitsijana 1967–1969.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 488: Peter Alexander Freiherr von Ustinov (16 April 1921 – 28 March 2004) was born at 45 Belsize Park, London, England. His father, Jona Freiherr von Ustinov, was of Russian, German, Polish, and Ethiopian Jewish descent. Peter´s paternal grandfather was Baron Plato von Ustinov, a Russian noble, and his grandmother was Magdalena Hall, of mixed German-Ethiopian-Jewish origin. Peter was a British actor, filmmaker and writer and a fixture on television talk shows and lecture circuits for much of his career. Peter oli kuraverinen äiskän puolelta.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 506: Bukowski syntyi Andernachissa, Saksassa ja muutti jo kaksivuotiaana perheensä kanssa Los Angelesiin, Yhdysvaltoihin, missä hän asui suurimman osan elämästään. Hänen äitinsä oli saksalainen ja isä yhdysvaltalainen sotilas. Lapsuudessaan Bukowski oli syrjäänvetäytyvä ja hiljainen. Teini-iässä hänelle tuli vielä äärimmäisen paha akne, mikä vaikeutti sosiaalista elämää entisestään. Nuoruudessaan hän vietti kiertelevää elämää asuen muun muassa Philadelphiassa ja New Orleansissa. Hän teki satunnaisia pätkätöitä ja kirjoitti novelleja, joita lähetti moniin kirjallisuuslehtiin julkaisun toivossa.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 516: Among Hubbard´s many publications were the fourteen-volume work Little Journeys to the Homes of the Great and the short publication A Message to Garcia. He and his second wife, Alice Moore Hubbard, died aboard the RMS Lusitania when it was sunk by a German submarine off the coast of Ireland on May 7, 1915.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 518: Robert von Ranke Graves (24 July 1895 – 7 December 1985) was a British poet, historical novelist, critic, and classicist. His father was Alfred Perceval Graves, a celebrated Irish poet and figure in the Gaelic revival; they were both Celticists and students of Irish mythology. Graves produced more than 140 works in his lifetime. His poems, his translations and innovative analysis of the Greek myths, his memoir of his early life—including his role in World War I—Good-Bye to All That, and his speculative study of poetic inspiration, The White Goddess, have never been out of print.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 519: He earned his living from writing, particularly popular historical novels such as I, Claudius; King Jesus; The Golden Fleece; and Count Belisarius. He also was a prominent translator of Classical Latin and Ancient Greek texts; his versions of The Twelve Caesars and The Golden Ass remain popular for their clarity and entertaining style. Graves was awarded the 1934 James Tait Black Memorial Prize for both I, Claudius and Claudius the God.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 536: In his memoirs, he calls his father “bashful” and his mother “reserved.” Between them, they filled the house with “melancholy reticences and unexpressed doubts.” Some of the silence surrounded a particular subject: the family’s Jewishness. This was not exactly hidden, but it was not brought to the fore, either. Maurois, who was born Émile Herzog on July 26, 1885, found out that he was Jewish at the age of about six, when a friend at the local Protestant church told him so. His parents confirmed it, but they also spoke highly of Protestantism.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 538: He had a good education at the lycée in Rouen, falling under the influence of a charismatic teacher, Émile-Auguste Chartier, known as “Alain.” Alain inspired other pupils, too, including Simone Weil and Raymond Aron, urging them to question received ideas. He gave Maurois a love of literature but also, perhaps surprisingly, urged him to take up the mill business after leaving school. Maurois did so, but in his Elbeuf office he kept a secret cupboard filled with Balzac novels and notebooks, and copied out pages of Stendhal to improve his writing style. He became a Kipling enthusiast, and learned excellent English. He travelled to Paris at least one day a week, and frequented brothels there.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 540: But then he fell in love! Emppu rakastui Geneven lomalla 16-vuotiaaseen koulutyttöön kuin Vladi Lolitaan. Janine matched a template that he had got from a book that influenced his erotic fantasies permanently. With her Slavic features and her cool, rather fey manner, Wanda "Janine" de Szymkiewicz (though Polish) made a perfect Russian queen. She called him Minou, he called her Ginou. Sini ja mini. Sometime in the early nineteen-twenties, Maurois began having affairs. Janine had them, too, or at least flirtations, aquarels of fucking, especially on their seaside vacations in Deauville. Maurois put a lot of his own personality into Shelley, and wrote of Harriet as a “child-wife” made bitter by unhappiness. Emil could be savage: “Even when she had the air of being interested in ideas, her indifference was proved by the blankness of her gaze. Worst of all, she was coquettish, frivolous, versed in the tricks and wiles of woman.” Fortunately, becoming pregnant again in late 1922, Janine developed septicemia, was operated on unsuccessfully, and died on February 26, 1923. Maurois was bereaved, and free. Jahuu! Vihelteliköhän sekin koko matkan hautajaisiin kuten Peppy? Rakkaus on hassuttelua yhdessä.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 559: Im Januar 1909 schloss er bei Berliner Vorträgen Rudolf Steiners mit diesem eine enge und dauerhafte Freundschaft. Um Steiners Vorträge zu hören, reiste er noch im selben Jahr nach Düsseldorf, Koblenz, Kristiania, Kassel und München. Im Mai trat er einen Monat nach Margareta der von Steiner geführten Deutschen Sektion der Theosophischen Gesellschaft bei. Bei der folgenden Spaltung dieser Körperschaft 1912/1913 blieb er auf der Seite Steiners und wurde Mitglied der Anthroposophischen Gesellschaft. 1909 übersetzte er auch Knut Hamsun, besuchte den Internationalen Theosophischen Kongress in Budapest und seinen Vater in Wolfshau, er reiste mit Margareta in den Schwarzwald und nach Obermais. Dort erkrankte er, wohl auch infolge der zahlreichen Reisen, an einer schweren Bronchitis. Ein Arzt deutete bereits auf den kurz bevorstehenden Tod hin. Morgensterns Zustand verbesserte sich jedoch wieder, und so heirateten er und Margareta am 7. März 1910.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 576: Jean Rostand, né le 30 octobre 1894 à Paris (17e arrondissement) et mort le 4 septembre 1977 à Ville-d´Avray (Hauts-de-Seine), était un écrivain, moraliste, biologiste, historien des sciences et académicien français. Très intéressé par les origines de la vie, il étudie la biologie des batraciens (grenouilles, crapauds, tritons et autres), la parthénogenèse, l´action du froid sur les œufs, et promeut de multiples recherches sur l´hérédité. Avec conviction et enthousiasme, il s´efforce de vulgariser la biologie auprès d´un large public (il reçoit en 1959 le prix Kalinga de vulgarisation scientifique) et d´alerter l´opinion sur la gravité et des problèmes humains qu´elle pose. Considérant la biologie comme devant être porteuse d´une morale, il met en garde contre les dangers qui menacent les humains lorsqu´ils jouent aux apprentis sorciers, comme les tenants de l´eugénisme. Toutefois, Rostand soutient une forme d´« eugénisme 'positif' », approuvant certains écrits d´Alexis Carrel et la stérilisation des personnes atteintes de certaines formes graves de maladies mentales, ce qui fut rapproché, après la guerre, de la loi nazie de 1933, et lui fut reproché dans un contexte où l´eugénisme est une idéologie encore répandue avec des auteurs comme Julian Huxley, premier directeur de l´UNESCO (1946-1948).
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 578: Sir Julian Sorell Huxley FRS (22 June 1887 – 14 February 1975) was an English evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and internationalist. He was a proponent of natural as well as unnatural selection, and a leading figure in the mid-twentieth century modern synthesis. He was secretary of the Zoological Society of London (1935–1942), the first Director of UNESCO, a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund, the president of the British Eugenics Society (1959-1962), and the first President of the British Humanist Association. Huxley came from the Huxley family on his father´s side and the Arnold family on
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 579: his mother´s. His great-grandfather was Thomas Arnold of Rugby School, his
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 580: great-uncle Matthew Arnold, and his aunt Mrs Humphry Ward. His grandfather was
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 582: evolution, and his father was writer and editor Leonard Huxley. Huxley´s mother was Julia Arnold (1862–1908), a graduate of Somerville College, Oxford, who had gained a First in English Literature there in 1882. Julia and Leonard married in 1885 and they had four children: Margaret (1899–1981), the novelist Aldous, Trevenen and Julian.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 584: British Eugenics Society oli Darwinin serkun Sir Francis Galtonin aivopieruja. Galton ei selvinnyt laajennetusta matematiikasta ja lääkärinopinnotkin jäi sitten kesken. Tehdäänpä sensijaan nazimeisingillä selvää muista misfiteistä! Galtonin veljexiin kuului mm iljexet Julian ja Aldous Huxley, H.G.Wells, Winston Churchill, Bertrand Russell ja Charles Darwin. "Man is gifted with pity and other kindly feelings; he has also the power of preventing many kinds of suffering. I conceive it to fall well within his province to replace Natural Selection by other processes that are more merciful and not less effective. This is precisely the aim of Eugenics.” Since wars begin in the minds of men and women, it is in the minds of men and women that the defences of peace must be constructed. (UNESCO)
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 590: Max Ernst (2 April 1891 – 1 April 1976) was a German (naturalised American in 1948 and French in 1958) painter, sculptor, graphic artist, and poet. A prolific artist, Ernst was a primary pioneer of the Dada movement and surrealism. He had no formal artistic training, but his experimental attitude toward the making of art resulted in his invention of frottage—a technique that uses pencil rubbings of objects as a source of images—and grattage, an analogous technique in which paint is scraped across canvas to reveal the imprints of the objects placed beneath. He is also noted for his novels consisting of collages. Vitun tuhertaja. Onko hölmömpää kuin noi Maxin älynväläyxet? Se on yhtä puupää kuin Wolfram Rothin isäpuoli Ernst Rüdiger. Turmiolan Hannu on kyllä raapinut aforismikasaansa ihan pahnanpohjatkin. Oscar Wilden turauxet puolestaan on tyypillistä homopetteröintiä.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 595: Margaret Caroline Anderson (November 24, 1886 – October 19, 1973) was the American founder, editor and publisher of the art and literary magazine The Little Review, which published a collection of modern American, English and Irish writers between 1914 and 1929. The periodical is most noted for introducing many prominent American and British writers of the 20th century, such as Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot in the United States, and publishing the first thirteen chapters of James Joyce's then-unpublished novel, Ulysses. A large collection of her papers on Gurdjieff's teaching is now preserved at Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University. She was blond, shapely, with lean ankles and a Scandinavian face. ... In 1916, Anderson met Jane Heap. The two became lovers. In early 1924, through Alfred Richard Orage, Anderson came to know of spiritual teacher George Ivanovitch Gurdjieff, and saw performances of his 'Sacred dances', first at the 'Neighbourhood Playhouse', and later at Carnegie Hall. Shortly after Gurdjieff's automobile accident, Anderson, along with Georgette Leblanc, Jane Heap and Monique Surrere, moved to France to visit him at Fountainebleau-Avon, where he had set up his institute at Château du Prieuré in Avon.
    xxx/ellauri128.html on line 597: The teachings of George Ivanovitch Gurdjieff played an important role in Anderson's life. Anderson met Gurdjieff in Paris and, together with Leblanc, began studies with him, focusing on his original teaching called The Fourth Way. Along with Katherine Mansfield and Jane Heap, she remains one of the most noted institutees of Gurdjieff´s, Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man, at Fontainebleau, near Paris, from October 1922 to 1924. Anderson studied with Gurdjieff in France until his death in October 1949, writing about him and his teachings in most of her books, most extensively in her memoir, The Unknowable Gurdjieff. By 1942 her relationship with Heap had cooled. Anderson sailed for the United States. Jane Heap had moved to London in 1935, where she led Gurdjieff study groups until her death in 1964. With her passage paid by Ernest Hemingway, Anderson met on the voyage Dorothy Caruso, widow of the singer and famous tenor Enrico Caruso. The two began a romantic relationship, and lived together until Dorothy´s death in 1955. Anderson returned to Le Cannet, and there she died of emphysema on October 19, 1973.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 163: Olisin kuollut itsekin, jos olisin jäänyt siihen liittoon. NÄLVIMINEN ja haukkuminen oli jatkuvaa. Vaikken ole mikään alistuva hissukka, jouduin mukailemaan ja tekemään asioita hänen toiveidensa mukaan.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 412: Kun kynäilijä tarttuu kynään, totuuden ja kauneuden kylkeen saattaa ilmestyä rujoja inhimillisiä kasvannaisia nopeammin kuin villisika aivastaa: kiimaa, väkivaltaa, naisvihaa, miesvihaa ja koko häpeäspektrin kirjolta historian kaunokirjallisia juttuja. Don't I know, I've been there.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 416: Vilkaisin "toisen kirjoitustyön takia" Amazonin myydyimmän eroottisen kirjallisuuden listaa. Ykkösenä olleen E. L. Jamesin Grey-piiskariiauksen jälkeen kärjen nimikkeet olivat naishistorian kauhugalleriasta: Serving Him. Property of the Bad Boy. A Dark Bad Boy. Arrogant Bastard. Cocky Bastard. Forced Submission 1 & 2. Teokset ovat naisten tai naisnimimerkkien kirjoittamia ja ostajat – vain oletus, myönnän – kai pääosin naisia. Mäkin sanon aina että ostan vaimolle. Oletettavasti olen kaiken feikkiliberaalisuuteni alla vitun misogyyni. Riku (minä siis) jatkaa:
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 418: Me valkoiset länsimaiset heteromiehet olemme sataviisikymmentä vuotta – haparoiden, myönnän – opetelleet eroon historiallisesta etuoikeudestamme väkivaltaan ja seksirikoksiin. Monet meistä ovat muuntuneet vilpittömiksi mieshegemonian kyseenalaistajiksi ja sensitiivisiksi yrttiharrastajiksi (en minä). Tiedän joidenkin kotimaisten mieskollegoideni nykyään välttävän kirjoittamista seksistä, jotta eivät näkökulmallaan loukkaisi naislukijoita ja kuulisi syyttelyä naisvihasta.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 447: I appreciate the novella has a plot, but this strength is not enough to overcome the story´s weaknesses, which for me were 1) overly long paragraphs of narrative--one went for almost six pages, and 2) a lack of understanding until almost halfway through the story what the stakes for the protagonist were.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 521: Onnellisilla ei ole historiaa.George EliotFFUCK!
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 615: Francis Wiener de Croissant, né Edgar Franz Wiener à Bruxelles le 28 janvier 1877 et mort à Neuilly-sur-Seine le 8 novembre 1937, est un auteur dramatique, romancier et librettiste français. Francis de Croisset est issu d'une famille juive allemande. Son grand-père, Jacques Wiener (1815-1899), s'était installé vers 1835 à Bruxelles ; graveur, il créa le premier timbre belge. Le frère cadet de celui-ci, Léopold Wiener, se fit également connaître comme graveur, médailleur et sculpteur. Le père de Francis de Croisset, Alexandre Wiener (1848-1920), était peintre. L'un de ses oncles, Samson Wiener (1851-1914), fut sénateur à la chambre haute de Belgique et bourgmestre d'une commune bruxelloise. The whole family was known for their remarkable skinless wieners. Francis' innovation was to embed his Jewish wiener in a French croissant, creating the first hot-dog.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 617: At age 17, he rebelled against his parents' wishes that he take up a military career, and ran away to Paris. In 1901, his play Chérubin was produced at the Comédie-Française where Cécile Sorel (later the Comtesse de Ségur) made her debut in it. Jules Massenet set Chérubin to music and, in 1905, Mary Garden sang its première at the Opéra de Monte-Carlo.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 623: Il est le père de Philippe Wiener de Croisset, patron de presse (père de l'homme d'affaires Charles de Croisset) et de Germaine Wiener de Croisset, épouse de l'artiste peintre et critique d'art Roger Lannes de Montebello (1908-1986) et mère de Philippe Lannes de Montebello, qui fut pendant plus de trente ans directeur du Metropolitan Museum of Art de New York. This is how the hot-dog crossed the Atlantic and became a household pet in the U.S.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 639: Gerfaut Philippe pseudonyme de Marguerite Dardenne de La Grangerie. Pensées d´un sceptique. Usant de plusieurs pseudonymes tels que Philippe Gerfaut et Marie-Alix de Valtine, elle est l´auteur entre autres du roman Le passé de Claudie (1884), des Pensées d´un sceptique (1886) et de Belle et bonne histoire d´une grande fillette (Prix Lambert en 1890).
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 640: Son mari, Albert Dardenne de la Grangerie, était fameux journaliste, rédacteur entres autres du Figaro et du Messager du Midi. Marguerite de la Grangerie fut avec son mari très liée au couple Gautier, Judith et Théophile. Elle était la petite-fille du duc de Persigny, propriétaire du chateau de Chamarande ou Théo séjourna en 1866. Ce dernier lui dédiera d’ailleurs deux sonnets dont « les poètes chinois… ». Usant de plusieurs pseudonymes tels que Philippe Gerfaut et Marie-Alix de Valtine, elle est l’auteur entre autres du roman Le passé de Claudie (1884), des Pensées d’un sceptique (1886) et de Belle et bonne histoire d’une grande fillette (Prix Lambert en 1890). Superbe exemplaire dans une reliure mosaïquée parfaitement établi par Louis Pouillet. Petites taches pâles sur le plat supérieur‎. Gerfaut puuttuu Vaakun hakemistosta.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 648: Theophilus, however, held quite decisive religious beliefs. After many years of marriage, Elizabeth Packard outwardly questioned her husband's beliefs and began expressing opinions that were contrary to his. While the main subject of their dispute was religion, the couple also disagreed on child rearing, family finances, and the issue of slavery, with Elizabeth defending John Brown, which embarrassed Theophilus. What was worst, she also worked as a teacher in Jacksonville, Illinois.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 650: When Illinois opened its first hospital for the mentally ill in 1851, the state legislature passed a law that within two years of its passage was amended to require a public hearing before a person could be committed against his or her will. There was one exception, however: a husband could have his wife committed without either a public hearing or her consent. In 1860, Theophilus Packard judged that his wife was "slightly insane", a condition he attributed to "excessive application of body and mind". He arranged for a doctor, J.W. Brown, to speak with her. The doctor pretended to be a sewing machine salesman. During their conversation, Elizabeth complained of her husband's domination and his accusations to others that she was insane. Dr. Brown reported this conversation to Theophilus (along with the observation that Mrs. Packard "exhibited a great dislike to me"). Theophilus decided to have Elizabeth committed. She learned of this decision on June 18, 1860, when the county sheriff arrived at the Packard home to take her into custody.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 652: Elizabeth Packard spent the next three years at the Jacksonville Insane Asylum in Jacksonville, IL (now the Jacksonville Developmental Center). She was regularly questioned by her doctors but refused to agree that she was insane or to change her religious views. In June 1863, due, in part, to pressure from her children, who wished her released, the doctors declared that she was incurable and discharged her. Upon her discharge, Theophilus locked her in the nursery of their home and nailed the windows shut. Elizabeth managed to drop a letter complaining of this treatment out the window, which was delivered to her friend Sarah Haslett. Sarah Haslett in turn delivered the letter to Judge Charles Starr, who issued a writ of habeas corpus ordering Theophilus to bring Elizabeth to his chambers to discuss the matter. After being presented with Theophilus' evidence, Judge Starr scheduled a jury trial to allow a legal determination of Elizabeth's sanity to take place.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 654: At the subsequent trial of Packard v. Packard, which lasted five days, Theophilus's lawyers produced witnesses from his family who testified that Elizabeth had argued with her husband and tried to withdraw from his congregation. These witnesses concurred with Theophilus that this was a sign of insanity. The record from the Illinois State Hospital stating that Mrs. Packard's condition was incurable was also entered into the court record.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 656: Elizabeth's lawyers, Stephen Moore and John W. Orr, responded by calling witnesses from the neighborhood that knew the Packards but were not members of Theophilus' church. These witnesses testified they never saw Elizabeth exhibit any signs of insanity, while discussing religion or otherwise. The final witness was Dr. Duncanson, who was both a physician and a theologian. Dr. Duncanson had interviewed Elizabeth and he testified that while not necessarily in agreement with all her religious beliefs, she was sane in his view, arguing that "I do not call people insane because they differ with me. I pronounce her a sane woman and wish we had a nation of such women.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 662: With that, she did not go back to her former life, but became a national celebrity of sorts, publishing "an armload of books and criss-crossing the United States on a decades-long reform campaign", not only fighting for married women's rights and freedom of speech, but calling out against "the power of insane asylums". She became what some scholars call "a publicist and lobbyist for better insanity laws". As scholar Kathryn Burns-Howard has argued, Packard reinvented herself in this rôle, earning enough to support her children and even her estranged husband, from whom she remained separated for the rest of her life. Ultimately, moderate supporters of women's rights in the northern U.S. embraced her, weaving her story into arguments about slavery, framing her experience as a type of enslavement and even arguing in the midst of the Civil War that a county in the midst of freeing African-American slaves should do the same for others who suffered from abusive husbands. Some argue that she seemed oblivious to her racial prejudice in arguing that white women had a "moral and spiritual nature" and suffered more "spiritual agony" than formerly enslaved African-Americans. Even so, others say that her story provided "a stirring example of oppressed womanhood" that others did not.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 664: Elizabeth petitioned the Illinois and Massachusetts legislatures, and in 1869 legislation was passed in those states allowing married women equal rights to property and custody of their children. Upon this being passed, her husband voluntarily ceded custody of their children back to Elizabeth, and her children came to live with her in Chicago.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 666: Elizabeth realized how narrow her legal victory had been; while she had escaped confinement, it was largely a measure of luck. The underlying social principles which had led to her confinement still existed. She founded the Anti-Insane Asylum Society and published several books, including Marital Power Exemplified, or Three Years Imprisonment for Religious Belief (1864), Great Disclosure of Spiritual Wickedness in High Places (1865), The Mystic Key or the Asylum Secret Unlocked (1866), and The Prisoners' Hidden Life, Or Insane Asylums Unveiled (1868). In 1867, the State of Illinois passed a "Bill for the Protection of Personal Liberty" which guaranteed that all people accused of insanity, including wives, had the right to a public hearing. She also saw similar laws passed in three other states. Even so, she was strongly attacked by medical professionals and anonymous citizens, unlike others such as Dorothea Dix, with her former doctor from the Jacksonville Insane Asylum, Dr. McFarland, who privately called her "a sort of Joan D'Arc in the matter of stirring up the personal prejudices". As such, Elizabeth's work on this front was "broadly unappreciated" while she was alive. She only received broader recognition, starting in the 1930s, by a well-known historian of mental illness, Albert Deutsch, and again in the 1960s from those who were "attacking the medical model of insanity".
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 672: William Wilkie Collins (8 January 1824 – 23 September 1889) was an English novelist and playwright known for The Woman in White (1859), and for The Moonstone (1868), which has been posited as the first modern English detective novel. Born to the London painter William Collins and his wife, he moved with the family to Italy when he was twelve, living there and in France for two years and learning Italian and French. He worked initially as a tea merchant. After publishing Antonina, his first novel, in 1850, Collins met Charles Dickens, who became a friend and mentor. Some Collins work first appeared in Dickens's journals Household Words and All the Year Round. They also collaborated on drama and fiction. Collins gained financial stability and an international following by the 1860s, but began to suffer from gout and became addicted to the opium he took for the pain, so that his health and writing quality declined in the 1870s and 1880s. Collins was critical of the institution of marriage: he split his time between widow Caroline Graves – living with her for most of his adult life, treating her daughter as his – and the younger Martha Rudd, by whom he had three children.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 675: Étienne Jodelle est un poète et dramaturge français, né en 1532 et mort en juillet de 1573 à Paris. Membre de la Pléiade, il s´efforcera de revitaliser les principes du théâtre antique à la Renaissance. Il est le premier à introduire l´alexandrin dans la tragédie à son époque, notamment avec Cléopâtre captive, la première tragédie à l´antique, ainsi que L´Eugène dans la comédie, reconnu comme un précurseur du théâtre qui naît dans la seconde moitié du XVIe siècle, une période convulsive qui verra ses incertitudes incarnées dans son œuvre L´Eugène est une comédie humaniste d´Étienne Jodelle, représentée pour la première fois en 1553, à l´Hôtel de Reims, en même temps que Cléopâtre captive. C´est la première comédie à l´antique en langue française, même si certains de ses éléments sont encore proches de la farce : en cela, elle constitua un moment fort dans l´histoire de la Pléiade. Jodelle on piipunrassin näköinen.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 677: Henry Jones (2 November 1831 – 10 February 1899) was an English writer under the name "Cavendish", an authority on whist and other card games, tennis and other lawn games. Aivan vitun iso hipsterparta muttei wiixiä. Haavuri "Dervishi" Jonesin poikia. Loppupeleissä Henryllä meni aika heikosti.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 711: George Meredith (12. helmikuuta 1828 Portsmouth, Englanti – 18. toukokuuta 1909 Box Hill, Surrey, Englanti) OM, oli viktoriaanisen ajan englantilainen kirjailija ja runoilija. Meredith syntyi Portsmouthissa Englannissa laivastoupseerin poikana. Hänet lähetettiin 14-vuotiaana herrnhutilaiseen kouluun Saksaan Neuwiediin, jossa hän oli kaksi vuotta. Meredith opiskeli oikeustiedettä tavoitteenaan asianajajan ammatti. Hän jätti lukunsa kesken ja alkoi opiskella journalismia sekä kirjoittaa runoja. Vittu näitä juristi-dropouteja piisaa kirjailijapiireissä.
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 723: Nodier oli luonnontutkija, nuorgrammaatikko. historioitsija, politikoitsija, runoilijoitsija ja romaanikirjastonhoitaja. Oivallinen, yksinkertainen, kuultavan selkeä tyyli kannattaa hänen runsasta tuotantoaan. Nodierin värikkäistä ja jännittävistä totaalisesti unohtuneista romaaneista merkittäviä ovat muun muassa Jean Sbogar, Thérèse Aubert, Smarra, ou les démons de la nuit. Le roi de Bohème et ses sept châteaux, La fée aux miettes, Mademoiselle de Marsan (1832–1834, Œuvres de Nodier), historiallisista teoksista Le dernier banquet des Girondins (1833).
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 729: Nodierin kirjoitukset luonnonhistoriasta sisältävät useita hyönteistiedettä koskevia aiheita, kuten Dissertation sur l’usage des antennes dans les insectes (1798) ja Bibliographie entomologique (1801). Kielitiedettä käsittelevät Nodierin teokset ovat Dictionnaire raisonné des onomatopoées de la langue française (1808), Dictionnaire universel de la langue française (1823), Examen critique des dictionnaires de la langue française (1828) ja Notions élémentaires de linguistique (1834).
    xxx/ellauri129.html on line 730: Nodierin historiallisista teksteistä ei jaxa enää paasata. Nodierin koottujen runojen teos ilmestyi vuonna 1827. Myöhemmin vuonna 1876.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 116: "I also will do this unto you... You shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it." -- Leviticus 26:16
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 124: "Through the wrath of the LORD of hosts is the land darkened, and the people shall be as the fuel of the fire: no man shall spare his brother. And he shall snatch on the right hand, and be hungry; and he shall eat on the left hand, and they shall not be satisfied: they shall eat every man the flesh of his own arm." -- Isaiah 9:19-20
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 128: "And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend." -- Jeremiah 19:9
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 137: "This woman said unto me, Give thy son, that we may eat him to day, and we will eat my son to morrow. So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son, that we may eat him." 2 Kings 6:28-29
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 151: Vastaan: Ensinnäkin kohdat ovat VT:n puolelta, jossa kerrotaan Juutalaisten ja heidän ympärillä olevien kansojen historiasta eli ihmisten historiasta. Ja ihmisen historia on väkivaltainen, kauhistuttava ja paha, vakamukseen katsomatta, valitettavasti.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 170: Credo quia absurdum is a Latin phrase that means "I believe because it is absurd", originally misattributed to Tertullian in his De Carne Christi. It is believed to be a paraphrasing of Tertullian's prorsus credibile est, quia ineptum est which means "It is completely credible because it is unsuitable", or certum est, quia impossibile which means "It is certain because it is impossible". These are consistent with the anti-Marcionite context. Early modern, Protestant and Enlightenment rhetoric against Catholicism and religion more broadly resulted in this phrase being changed to "I believe because it is absurd", displaced from its original anti-Marcionite to a personally religious context.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 174: Marcion of Sinope (/ˈmɑːrʃən, -ʃiən, -siən/; Greek: Μαρκίων [note 1] Σινώπης; c. 85 – c. 160) was an early Christian theologian, an evangelist, and an important figure in early Christianity.Marcion preached that the benevolent God of the Gospel who sent Jesus Christ into the world as the savior was the true Supreme Being, different from and opposed to the malevolent demiurge or creator god, identified with the Hebrew God of the Old Testament. He considered himself a follower of Paul the Apostle, whom he believed to have been the only true apostle of Jesus Christ, a doctrine called Marcionism. Marcion published the earliest extant fixed collection of New Testament books, making him a vital figure in the development of Christian history.[citation needed] Early Church Fathers such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Tertullian denounced Marcion as a heretic, and he was excommunicated by the church of Rome around 144. He published the first known canon of Christian sacred scriptures, which contained ten Pauline epistles (the Pastoral epistles weren't included) and a shorter version of the Gospel of Luke (the Gospel of Marcion). This made him a catalyst in the process of the development of the New Testament canon by forcing the proto-orthodox Church to respond to his canon. Varmaan Marcion oli sitten yhtä persepää kuin Puovoli.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 176: In 394, Epiphanius claimed that after beginning as an ascetic, Marcion seduced a virgin and was accordingly excommunicated by his father, prompting him to leave his home town. Similarly doubtful is Tertullian's claim that Marcion had professed repentance, but that he was prevented from doing so by his death.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 177: The Marcionite church expanded greatly within Marcion's lifetime, becoming a major rival to the emerging Catholic church. After his death, it retained its following and survived Christian controversy and imperial disapproval for several centuries.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 549: Alfred Austin P.L. (30 May 1835 – 2 June 1913) was an English poet who was appointed Poet Laureate in 1896, after an interval following the death of Tennyson, when the other candidates had either caused controversy or refused the honour. It was claimed that he was being rewarded for his support for the Conservative leader Lord Salisbury in the General Election of 1895. Austin´s poems are little-remembered today, his most popular work being prose idylls celebrating nature. Austin oli aika lailla Unlucky Alfin näköinen. Bugger it. With my luck, they nominate me as Poet Laureate. Austin was caricatured as "Sir Austed Alfrin" by L. Frank Baum in his 1906 novel John Dough and the Cherub. He was also the subject of a Vanity Fair cartoon by Spy published on 20 February 1896.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 579: Myös Vilpittömän Nahkurin Runous-nettiradion kuudes sarja on juuri alkanut, ja tämän päivän jaksossa entinen runoilijapalkinnon saaja Carola Anna Tussua pohtii lähetysennusteen rukousmaista laatua: ‘There’s never been a time when you could just say anything’: Frank Skinner on free speech, his bullying shame – and knob [kyrvännuppi] jokes. This poetry-loving, religious knob has deep regrets about some of his comedy: either the standup comic has grown up, or he was never as laddish as his image suggested. Nearing death and last judgment, he is hoping to perform a “cleaner, cleverer” kind of act, one that would let him look straight at the crowd and – perhaps for the first time in his life – not see anybody squirming in their seat in discomfort. “It was a struggle,” the 65-year-old says with a grin, “because I realised that I seem to think in knob jokes. And I have done since I was about 13. In the West Midlands, that was how people communicated!”
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 581: 30 Years of Dirt is not, then, a compendium of Skinner’s best sex gags – of which there have been plenty over the years. Rather, it’s a comedic journey through his attempt to de-smutify his brain for the modern woke audience, a kind of personal challenge: can he even be funny without talking about penises? (No, he gets boring as a prayer book.)
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 583: “I don’t think there’s ever been a time when you could just say anything.” He recalls an early comedy show – this must have been in the late 80s – where the host apologised to the crowd after Skinner had performed some risque sexual material. “He said I’d never play at the venue again – and then he launched into a load of racist material and brought the house down. Everyone’s got their own standards and restraints. But I think it’s been good for me to keep questioning what I say. It’s made me think more positively about racist jokes and not so much about penises. My knob is not working anymore BTW, I'm 65. We’re both deeply ashamed. Can't lift our eye to the public.”
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 585: So the other day, he blacked up as [black footballer] Lee for a sketch, complete with a pineapple to represent his hair. Boy that went down in the colored audience! Skinner has been that funny for as long as he can remember as far as he can remember. He has a masters in English literature; he is a practising Roman catholic. What a laugh. Skinner once had a chat with Eddie Izzard about what they could share about their lives on stage. It was fine for Izzard to discuss wearing women’s clothes, but as for Skinner’s own religious beliefs about God's knob? God, no. Too shameful.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 587: But recently that position has shifted a little. Last year he published A Comedian’s Prayer Book, which features him talking to the supreme being in his typically down-to-earth way (“I always liked thinking Jesus' knob hung out from women's clothes with sinners. It made me feel potentially understood”). “One of the things religion has suffered from is being spoken of in grave terms constantly. I seriously think it is a joke." Another boring thing about Skinner: he’s been a teetotaller since he reached his 60s. He got a kid at 55, who must now be, wait, 35? No, Buzz is just 10. I have only recently realized I'm not the main character here, but just an extra in a bigger scene. “Hitting kids … that’s another of those things that have stopped,” Evolution is what Skinner is all about – animals can change and they can grow, it just takes millions of years. When he made his jokes about racism and homophobia, he says, there was a slight backlash from the left. They hadn't stopped hitting lads, the sods. Frank Skinner’s 30 Years of Dirt is at the Assembly Roxy, Edinburgh, from 4 to 28 August. For more information and tickets go to frankskinnerlive.com.
    xxx/ellauri130.html on line 603: My mate has the campest walk ever. We did a sponsored 13-mile walk once and I tied his shoelaces together as a joke. He didn’t even notice.
    xxx/ellauri134.html on line 132: Jungin arkkityypit selitetään kaikenkaakattavixi alkeellisixi esikuvixi ja kuvixi jotka johtuu kolhoosimaisesta tajuttomuudesta, kuten ehdotti ei kukaan muu kuin Carl Jung. Ne on psyykkinen ekvivalentti vaistolle. Toisin sanoen, ne on apinan vaistoja, hämärä ajatus joka johtuu apinahistorian loppusummasta, joka on poltettu niihen sisään ja aiheuttaa tietoista käytöstä.
    xxx/ellauri134.html on line 494: tarot history
    xxx/ellauri134.html on line 504: Share this:
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 70: Anything and everything by Carl Jung - blows your mind and transforms your thinking, love his writing.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 99: The Sungod’s Journey Through the Netherworld by Andreas Schweizer—This Jungian psychoanalyst took the greatly misunderstood texts of the Amduat (what is in the netherworld) and made sense of them as a journey of transformation.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 101: The Pilgrimage by Paulo Coelho—all of his spiritual writings are amazing. I picked this one because the story was closest to my own spiritual journey.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 105: Annals of the Former World by John McPhee—this is me cheating so I don’t have to say “all of John McPhee’s geology writing”—John McPhee, who made reading about oranges (yes the fruit) interesting, got bit by the geology bug while researching for an essay about geology in the Southwest. I know this feeling. Again, this is engagingly written and most informative.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 108: Sophia is female, about 50, with a cowboy hat, Professional Artist and Author. BA in Ancient Egypt & Geology, University of Pennsylvania, Graduated 1984, 249.6K content views20.1K this month.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 121: This “special snowflake” theme is taken even further when wizards from other countries are introduced. We loved the fact that there was one whole wizarding school in China. And, quite honestly, how exactly have they kept the Communists out???
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 125: There is bigotry and racism, and I do not for one second believe that JK Rowling thought hard enough about the issue to make it the product of the “pure blood” crowd. I believe that for her it was all about making Harry and his friends “special.” They had obstacles to overcome, like Hermione with her non-magical parents and the Weasleys, who were generally despised for being not very serious (literally the red-headed step children of the wizarding world.” There were “squibs.” Name-calling and bullying in this school are as common as in the “normal world,” only often the bullying comes much closer to insulting one’s parents than it does in the outside world.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 127: There was the elitist attitude that the people in the outside world would “just not understand,” or they would be “scared and mistrustful” of the wizarding world. This is a very liberal mindset: they are “progressive,” and the rest of us will not understand their grand scheme.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 168: If you like to read the Bible, may I suggest you to read our book Quran? PBUHH! It comes from where the original Bible (by the way the word "bible" comes from bibliotekhe, original name is Incil [From Ottoman Turkish انجیل‎ (incil), from Arabic إِنْجِيل‎ (ʾinjīl), from Ancient Greek εὐαγγέλιον (euangélion, “good news”)]) comes and acknowleges what Jesus brought and his miracles. You can find the story of Mariam, Zekeriyya and Jesus in Quran. PBUHH!.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 211: Törkeän raiskauksen keskirangaistus on 3–4 vuoden ehdoton kankeusrangaistus. Pakottaminen sukupuoliyhteyteen johtaa yleensä hieman alle vuoden pituiseen ehdolliseen kankeuteen. Avioerolla tai rahanmenolla uhkaaminen ei ole kangistavaa. Tekotapana on tyypillisesti kiinni pitäminen, riisuminen sekä kaataminen sängylle ja munan insertoiminen emättimeen ja sen vatkutus siellä edestakaisin kunnes mälli lennähtää. Ei siinä yleensä kauan nokka tuhise.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 291: 1. Ensinnäkin runon nimi ja sen kirjoittaja on merkitty, ja sitten on tarpeen kertoa työn syntymisajankohdasta, sen luomisen historiasta, missä se on kirjoitettu, missä olosuhteissa ja kenelle se on omistettu. Mikä tahansa kirjallisuus, myös lyriikka, liittyy väistämättä historialliseen aikaan, tämän yhteiskunnan kehityksen ajan erityispiirteisiin. Järjestelmän toinen kohta on siksi luonnollinen.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 293: 2. Ajatuksen runo, sen historialliset piirteet.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 297: Järjestelmän ensimmäiset kolme osaa osoittavat, miten runoja analysoidaan yhteiskunnan yhteiskunnallis-historiallisen kehityksen, runoilija- ja yhteiskuntayhteyden ja teoksen genren omaperäisyyden näkökulmasta.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 406: Lermontovin "Pilvien" runon luomisen ja analysoinnin historia
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 469:
    Luomuksen historia

    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 512: So where I start is with connection. Because, by the time you're a social worker for 10 years, what you realize is that connection is why we're here. It's what gives purpose and meaning to our lives. This is what it's all about. It doesn't matter whether you talk to people who work in social justice, mental health and abuse and neglect, what we know is that connection, the ability to feel connected, is -- neurobiologically that's how we're wired -- it's why we're here. Olemme ohjelmoituja kuulumaan joukkoon. Voi hemmetti.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 514: And when you ask people about connection, the stories they told me were about disconnection. I need to figure out what this is. And it turned out to be shame. And shame is really easily understood as the fear of disconnection: Is there something about me that, if other people know it or see it, that I won't be worthy of connection? Is my butt not smelling right to the other bees? Will they kill me?
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 518: What underpinned this shame, this "I'm not good enough," -- which, we all know that feeling: "I'm not white enough. I'm not thin enough, rich enough, beautiful enough, smart enough, promoted enough." The thing that underpinned this was excruciating vulnerability. This idea of, in order for connection to happen, we have to allow ourselves to be seen, really seen, butts bare.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 520: There was only one variable that separated the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging and the people who really struggle for it. And that was, the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging believe they're worthy of love and belonging. That's it. These are whole-hearted people, self-satisfied people, living from this deep sense of worthiness. What they had in common was a sense of courage. Courage, the original definition of courage, when it first came into the English language -- it's from the Latin word "cor," meaning "heart" -- and the original definition was to be who you are with your whole heart (sydän taas, hui, yäk). And so these folks had, very simply, the courage to be imperfect.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 526: They had the compassion to be kind to themselves first and then to others, because, as it turns out, we can't practice compassion with other people if we can't treat ourselves kindly. We can't give to others if we don't pour a lot to ourselves first. And the last was they had connection, and -- this was the hard part -- as a result of authenticity, they were willing to let go of who they thought they should be in order to be who they were, which you have to absolutely do that for connection.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 532: How would you define vulnerability? What makes you feel vulnerable? Having to ask my husband for help because I'm sick; initiating sex with my husband; initiating sex with my boss; Initiating sex with a bunch of strangers; being turned down; being turned upside down; asking someone out; asking someone in and out; waiting for the doctor to call back; waiting for the doctor to cum on my back; getting laid off; getting laid; laying off people; getting laid by a bunch of people. This is the world we live in. We live in a vulnerable world. And one of the ways we deal with it is we numb vulnerability. Apina kiipee puuhun, kakkaa gorillan suuhun.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 534: Because -- We are the most in-debt ... obese ... addicted and medicated adult cohort in U.S. history. Goodbye vulnerability, farewell grief, byebye shame, so long fear, see ya later disappointment. I don't want to feel you up. I'm going to have a couple of beers and a banana nut muffin. Move fat from my cheek to my butt.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 537: Now this fatass bitch really got some World I problems, she has.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 539: I can tell you as a parent, that's excruciatingly difficult -- to practice gratitude and joy in those moments of terror, when we're wondering, "Can I love you this much? Can I believe in this this passionately? Can I be this fierce about this? Can I make her pass the midterm tennis test? Can I really be such a helicopter mom, a really cringy curling one?
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 541: Just stop and, instead of catastrophizing what might happen, say, "I'm just so grateful, because to feel this vulnerable means I'm alive." That's all I have. I mean I'm enough, and so're you, although not quite so much enough as me. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 590: Narcismus wird 1899 von Näcke geprägt und in die Wissenschaft eingeführt und als Narzissismus von Rank (spätestens ab 1909) und Freud (bis 1911) benutzt. Ableitung von Narziss bzw. älterem Narcis (junge, schöne, selbstverliebte griechische Sagengestalt) mit dem Derivatem (Ableitungsmorphem) -ismus. Statt der „logischen“ Ableitung Narzissismus (bzw. Narcisismus) entstand durch Haplologie Narzissmus (bzw. Narcismus). Freud benutzt eine Weile die längere, logischere Form, aber entscheidet sich dann 1911 bewusst für die „kürzere und weniger übelklingende“ Form.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 592: 1905, from German Narzissismus, coined 1899 (in "Die sexuellen Perversitäten"), by German psychiatrist Paul Näcke (1851-1913), on a comparison suggested 1898 by Havelock Ellis, from Greek Narkissos, name of a beautiful youth in mythology (Ovid, "Metamorphoses," iii.370) who fell in love with his own reflection in a spring and was turned to the flower narcissus (q.v.). Narcissus himself as a figure of self-love is attested by 1767. Coleridge used the word in a letter from 1822.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 659: She has been regarded as India's Greta Thunberg, though she does not like the usage of this term. She is not an autist after all.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 661: In June 2021, Licypriya was in the news as a crowdfunding appeal on Ketto seeking one crore rupees to buy 100 oxygen concentrators came under scrutiny following the arrest of her father and legal guardian Kangujam Karnajit, on May 31st 2021. Her father, also known as KK Singh, was declared an absconder and had fled Manipur in 2016 after he was arrested and let out on interim bail following multiple charges. These charges were for duping several self-help groups, hotels and individuals of more than Rs 19 lakh for a Global Youth Meet that he had organised in Imphal in 2014. His latest arrest was for fresh charges relating to his chairmanship of the International Youth Committee, an organisation founded by him. Several national and international students have been deceived of money amounting to around Rs 3 crore on the pretext of fees for multiple international youth exchange programs, that were never organised.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 682: As Frank Sinatra said, “Calling a girl a ‘broad’ is far less coarse than calling her a ‘dame’.” Before 1967, a track and field long jump was called a “broad jump”. However, due to “broad” being seen as an offensive term at this time, due to the fact that women were competing in broad jumps, the term was changed to “long jump”.
    xxx/ellauri136.html on line 683: Broad meant a meal ticket for a pimp. Men serving for slut holes in prison loving are called broads. If you liked this article and the Bonus Facts below, you might also like:
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 46: his.jpg" height="150px" />
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 51: Evoluutiopsykologia on hyvin pieni tieteenala, jolla on raskas historiallinen painolasti: geenipuheella on perusteltu ”rotujen” ja sukupuolien välisiä eroja esimerkiksi älykkyydessä (Tatu Vanhanen), mistä on seurannut jopa kansanmurhia. Evoluutiopsykologia-termin kehitti yhdysvaltalainen tutkijakotilo Michael Ghiselin vuonna 1973 Science-tiedelehdessä julkaisemassaan artikkelissa, jossa hän ennakoi Turun Darwinin ajatuksia.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 61: Maken mukaan lesbouden laadun voi päätellä vartalosta, leuasta ja jopa sormista. "Vastasin siihen lähinnä vitsinä, että olen metroseksuaali, en ole kiinnostunut suklaaosaston miähistä sillä lailla, mut ympäristöhoitajana lepakot kyllä kiinnostaa. Lepakot muuten syövät jauhopukkeja, ja hentosudenkorentoja myäs. Voisi kuvitella, että mentäs eteenpäin, kun ihmiset uskoo tieteeseen. On osa porukkaa, joka elää omassa kuplassaan. Musta mustamaalattiin joku pervo."
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 63: Keskustelu velloo paljolti sukupuoliasioiden ympärillä. Evoluution nimeen vannovat miesasiamiehet ovat jo pitkään olleet omassa nurkassaan leveilemässä iskuyrityksillään ja ulkoa opetelluilla vokottelustrategioillaan, jotka ilmeisesti eivät kuitenkaan olleet menestyksekkäitä, sillä nykyisin moni näistä miehistä julistaa elävänsä tahdonvastaisessa selibaatissa ja rakentaa identiteettinsä sen ympärille. Heitä kutsutaan nimellä incel, mikä on lyhenne sanoista involuntarily celibate. Monet incelit suhtautuvat pakkomielteisesti kumppanin löytämiseen, ja usein se tarkoittaa myös pakkomielteistä suhtautumista naisten biologiaan.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 72: Helsingin Sanomien tiedetoimituksessa aikoinaan evoluutiopsykologiaa popularisoinut tiedetoimittaja Marko Hamilo on kääntynyt entistä työnantajaansa vastaan. Hän oli vuonna 2017 perustamassa Oikea Media -nimistä konservatiivista ”vastamediaa”, jossa on kirjoitettu persumaisuuxia esimerkiksi islamista, maahanmuutosta, gettoutumisesta, Antifasta, ilmastonmuutoksesta, feminismistä, naisellisista miehistä, homoista, koronarokotteiden vaaroista sekä Ylen ja HS:n harjoittamasta sensuurista. Vuoden 2020 alusta Hamilo johti jonkin aikaa perussuomalaisten ajatuspajaa Suomen Perustaa. Hän oli toiminnanjohtajana puolustamassa ajatuspajan julkaisemaa neljäsataasivuista pamflettia siitä, kuinka ”rationalismin tappio” ja siitä seuranneet postmodernistiset ideologiat ovat ”kulttuurimädättäneet” Suomen julkisen keskustelun ja median. Pamfletin oli kirjoittanut kahdesti väitellyt abortinvastustaja Jukka Hankamäki. Feminismi-sanan johdoksia mainitaan kirjassa useammin kuin joka toisella sivulla, ja aatteen väitetään muun muassa tuhonneen naisen seksuaalivietin. Julkaisun jälkeen opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö ilmoitti perivänsä takaisin teokselle myönnetyn 10 000 euron valtion-avustuksen. Tällaiset jordanpetersonit me ansaizemme.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 194: When Manet painted this piece 1868, scenes of bourgeois life were in vogue. Yet The Balcony went against the conventions of the day. All the subjects were close acquaintances of the artist, especially Berthe Morisot who here, pictured sitting in the foreground, makes her first appearance in Manet's work, and who went on to become one of his favourite models.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 196: At its presentation at the 1869 Salon, this enigmatic group portrait was overwhelmingly misunderstood despite the obvious reference to Majas at the Balcony of Francisco Goya. "Close the shutters!" was the sarcastic reaction of the caricaturist Cham while another critic attacked "this gross art" and Manet who "lowered himself to the point of being in competition with the painters of the building trade".
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 206: And the Majas, they are not aristocratic ladies as their fine apparel may suggest; they lack refinement and dignity, though they are extremely attractive (particularly the one on the right, I would fuck her anytime). The artist calls them majas not mujeres. A patent wink to the same artist's best known work La Maja desnuda from the same year. They are no ordinary women. They are courtesans! Sluts, not to make too fine a point on it. Goya makes a subtle criticism on the society of his time. In Majas on a Balcony, Goya combines an ironic treatment of material with an impressionistic technique, a mode of presentation, which succeeds in creating a piece of social criticism. Buaahahahaha don't make me laugh!
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 344: and all the imperishable things we whispered, those
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 632: This is a satiric, politically incorrect romp through modern culture, having fun with Hollywood excesses, Da Vinci Code unrealities, spiritual and political pretentiousness, gender revisionism, and a host of contemporary inanities.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 634: Dancing to Mozart is a satire of Hollywood values and fantasies, Latin American dictatorships, Da Vinci Code conspirators, movie violence, magical realism, televangelists, mixed wrestling, extreme cosmetic surgery, and a host of other sensational idiocies that thrive on 21st century self-delusion. This whimsical contemporary “Candide” offers a trip through the world of out-of-control egos to a final revelation of ordinary common sense. The send-up is a mix of shrewd perception, lampoon, and wacko action that includes the Society of the Crystal Skull, the Opus Dopus, a female wrestling Amazon with one breast, an Arab who wants to recruit Islamic converts like an American billboard evangelist, two energetic film directors with crazy ideas, a rescue from captivity through “mind-invasion” (á la Inception) and a Hindu swami who tries to set all straight with a Bhagavad burrito. And a lot more.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 637: Edward Eriksson writes novels, plays, and travel essays. This is his third novel, his others being "Moonbeam in My Pocket, a Mystery of the Negro League" and "Flamingo Desires," a crime story set on Long Island.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 641: If you're buying this trash for a class then you're a sucker, turn back now! Hopefully Edward isn't still teaching his own tasteless fan fiction in a college setting. It's a misunderstood teenager's journey through satire complete with crude, unoriginal and stereotypical takes on characters from the lens of a self insert hero amounting to little more than finger pointing. You'll be offended, sure, but with little substance left to interpret besides the authors very obvious discomfort with himself and others unlike him. (Make some new friends, Edward.) Beyond being ridiculous as a required reading piece for a class, actually paying for this garbage is insulting, and of course it is an absolute drag to slog through. Nobody's going to publish this except on demand printing obviously and that's why you're buying it from Amazon!!!
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 662: Alok Mishra is a literary entrepreneur as well as a literary philanthropist who has been active in this field almost for a decade now (adding the individual capacity as well as organisational). He is currently active as the founder of BookBoys PR, a dedicated company which works for authors and publishers and help them reach the target readers. Alok has been in this field, promotions and author branding, for more than 4 years now.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 665:
    By Sal Fusaro, psychiatry, 7yrs. Liked by Carol Carini and 1 other. Edward Eriksson liked this. Poor Sal.


    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 690:
    Just an early morning nice shot down the block from our Police Plaza Branch. Carol Carini liked this.

    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 702: Lord Shimura is possibly named after Japanese actor Takashi Shimura ( 志村 喬) who is noteworthy for his appearances in 21 of 30 films by Japanese director Akira Kurosawa (more than any other actor) including Rashomon (1950), Seven Samurai (1954) and Throne of Blood (1957).
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 703: Ghost of Tsushima is a video game. Its main characters never existed in real historical texts. Jin Sakai and his uncle, Lord Shimura, are completely fictional characters.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 738: Tonya Maxene Harding (born November 12, 1970) is an American former figure skater, retired boxer and a reality television personality. Born in Portland, Oregon, Harding was raised primarily by her mother, who enrolled her in ice skating lessons beginning at three years old. Harding spent much of her early life training, eventually dropping out of high school to devote her time to the sport. After climbing the ranks in the U.S. Figure Skating Championships between 1986 and 1989, Harding won the 1989 Skate America competition. She became the 1991 and 1994 U.S. champion and 1991 World silver medalist. In 1991, she earned the distinction of becoming the first American woman to successfully land a triple Axel in competition - and the second woman to do so in history (behind Midori Ito). Harding is a two-time Olympian and a two-time Skate America Champion.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 745: Answer to What does "onna" mean in Japanese? How is the word used? 女 “onna” means female as an antonym of 男 “otoko” (male). The female has a protruding belly. The male has two feet, a tail in front, and a territory in place of head. If you go to a public bath in Japan, this Kanji character 女 shows you which bath room women should go in. Onna means 'bitch' ergo otoko means 'dog'.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 751: The novel features a passionate romance between Rei Shimura and Hugh Glendinning, the Scottish lawyer. Though the romance was not very realistic, I think it added an exciting and entertaining element to the novel. The first person point-of-view from which the novel is narrated allows the audience to truly understand the good and the bad of Rei’s character. She is independent to a fault but extremely loyal. She wants to immerse herself in Japanese culture, yet she rejects the social norms of society when they conflict with her desires. She is passionate about her interest in history and antiques, but logical by staying on as a teacher. The contradictions make her human and contribute to the reality of the novel. While mystery was not entirely believable, it was in no way predictable and I genuinely found the plot to be exciting. The Salaryman’s Wife, fits into the detective fiction tradition as most closely as a cozy, however the urban setting and the inclusion of graphic sex scenes contradict that classification
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 757: Suzy I agree with you entirely about the romance/relationship angle in this (and all her) books. I find the descriptions of life in Japan & art history engrossing, but the shift in to her personal life is shallow and inexplicable. I frequently stare at those paragraphs wondering, what's Rei's problem, whats Massey's problem? Rei's choice of friends are also pretty bad.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 759: I wish I knew of a better writer dealing with Japanese culture/art history & mystery. Tale of Genji perhaps. Naah it's boring. The pillow book. That's a good one.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 762: I had two main issues with this book: 1) that it was in first person.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 763: Everyone who knew me at this point knows that I dislike first person narratives and it must be an absolutely amazing story for me to overcome that strong, strong dislike. In this case because I had to follow Rei's every thought, I couldn't help but judge her for them and find her bratty and ...in need of common sense.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 765: Which ties me to the second point 2) The love interest. Who's a Caucasian Man (I will now abbreviate this as CM in all my future reviews with a WOC protagonist, I think) who overrides Rei's spoken opinion at so, so often that...okay Rei, if someone just tried to murder you in your room and you asked the hotel for a new room, DON'T LET THAT CM THAT YOU'VE KNOWN FOR LESS THAN TWO DAYS OVERRIDE YOUR OPINION AND FORCE YOU TO STAY OVERNIGHT WITH HIM! The fact that she ends up going along with HIS opinion nearly all the time 2a) DOES NOT EXCUSE HIS BEHAVIOR and 2b) is grating like nails on chalkboard.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 768: As I´ve said, this was written in 97, so the opinions are bound to be a little dated. However, THIS is 2014 and the implications (however unintentional) of the narrative in this book made me too uncomfortable to finish reading it.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 770: Lastly the main couples' relationship wasn't based on 'anything deeper', nor was it supposed to be. This is the first in a series so the relationship can develop, or not. Deeper deeper faster faster says faster Norie.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 773: The one stand-out annoyance for me was unexpectedly hitting upon yet another plot relying upon "rescuing" a female character from her sordid life of sex (or nearly-sex) work: hostessing, in this case. She's told she's "better" than that which means she should make less money doing something more honorable. It makes me want to write to the author and say she could do so much BETTER than write a book that hooks readers immediately with an erotically-charged story of sexual assault on a crowded train. I´m not mad at her, though, for giving the majority of readers what they want; just a pet peeve of mine.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 775: J. Condon liked her books that took place in India and recommended the author to friends but this book was terrible. No plot, just lots of running around with drama. All of the characters behaved weirdly. May keep me from buying more books by her.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 781: This makes sense...the author herself moved to Japan and taught English, and so in some ways I imagine that Ms. Massey has poured many of her pet peeves straight on the paper, showing that true experience often adds magic to fiction.
    xxx/ellauri137.html on line 787: Sujata, also Sujātā, Eugenie, well-born, was a farmer´s wife, who is said to have fed Gautama Buddha a bowl of kheer, a condensed milk-rice pudding, ending his six years of asceticism. Such was his emaciated appearance that she wrongly believed him to be a tree-spirit that had granted her wish of having a child. The gift provided him enough strength to cultivate the Middle Path, develop jhana, and attain Bodhi, thereafter becoming known as the Buddha. hism/lifebuddha/15lbud.htm">The story does not tell what the holy tree spirit said when Gautama ate his rice and curry.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 64: Peppu Colemanin hahmossa, se jutkunekru, oli yxi minuuden pioneereista (italics in the original). Pienuuden minooreista. Minäminä yxilöpaskantelu on Rothin lemppareita. Sen se oli varmaan oppinut Emanuel James Rohnilta. Sen inhokkisanoja oli me (suomexi, enkuxi sen mielisana oli sama) ja setelissäkin lukeva e pluribus unum. Annuit coeptis. Novus ordo saeclorum. The phrase is similar to a Latin translation of a variation of Heraclitus's tenth fragment, "The one is made up of all things, and all things issue from the one" (ἐκ πάντων ἓν καὶ ἐξ ἑνὸς πάντα). But it seems more likely that the phrase refers to Cicero's paraphrase of Pythagoras in his De Officiis, as part of his discussion of basic family and social bonds as the origin of societies and states: "When each person loves the other as much as himself, it makes one out of many (unum fiat ex Pluribus), as Pythagoras wishes things to be in friendship." Mikähän jeesus sekin luuli olevansa. Jenkkien peitesana izekkyydelle on vapaus.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 74: Rohn became a college dropout after just one year and started his professional life by working as an evil human resource manager for department store Sears. Around this time, a friend invited him to a lecture given by famous entrepreneur John Earl Shoaff. In 1955, Rohn joined Shoaff's direct selling business AbundaVita as a distributor.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 76: In 1957, Rohn resigned his distributorship with AbundaVita and joined Nutri-Bio, another direct selling company. It was at this point that the company's founders, including Shoaff, started to mentor him. After this mentorship, Rohn built one of the largest organizations in the company. In 1960 when Nutri-Bio expanded into Canada, Shoaff and the other founders selected Rohn as a vice president for the organization.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 78: After Nutri-Bio went out of business thanx to Jim in the early 1960s, Rohn was invited to speak at a meeting of his Rotary Club. He accepted and, soon, others began asking him to speak at various luncheons and other events. In 1963 at the Beverly Hills Hotel, he gave his first bullhshit seminar. He then began presenting seminars all over the country, telling his story and teaching his personal development and business philosophy.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 82: Rohn mentored Mark R. Hughes (the founder of Herbalife International) and life strategist Tony Robbins in the late 1970s. Others who credit Rohn for his influence on their careers include authors/lecturers Mark Victor Hansen and Jack Canafield (Chicken Soup book series), Everton Edwards (Hallmark Innovators Conglomerate), Brian Tracy, Todd Smith, and T. Harv Eker. Rohn also coauthored the novel Twelve Pillars with Chris Widener.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 84: Many of his speeches are now available for free on social media platforms like YouTube and Instagram.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 103: T. Harv Eker (born June 10, 1954) is an author, businessman and motivational speaker known for his theories on wealth and motivation. He is the author of the book Secrets of the Millionaire Mind published by HarperCollins.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 105: Eker was born in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and lived there through his childhood. As a young adult, Eker moved to the United States and started a series of over a dozen different companies before having success with an early retail fitness store. After reportedly making millions through a chain of fitness stores and subsequently losing his fortune through mismanagement, Eker started analyzing the relationships rich people have with their money and wealth, leading him to develop the theories he advances in his writing and speaking today.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 107: Eker’s writing and speaking often focus on his concept of the "Millionaire Mind," a collection of "mental attitudes that facilitate wealth." This theory proposes that we each possess a "financial blueprint," or an "internal script that dictates how we relate to money," and that by changing this blueprint people can change their ability to accumulate wealth.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 109: Other theories attributed to Eker include the concept that people unwilling to make major sacrifices in order to succeed "play the role" of the victim and deny that they have control of their own situations. Instead they should play the role of the perpetrator and take control of the victim. Another concept is that guilt prevents seeking wealth and that "thinking about wealth as a means to help others" relieves this guilt and enables wealth accumulation.[citation needed]. LOL.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 111: In his book, Eker lists 17 ways in which the financial blueprints of the rich differ from those of the poor and the middle-class. One theme identified in this list is that the rich discard limiting beliefs while the unsuccessful succumb to them. Eker argues that: Rich people believe, "I create my life", while poor people believe, "Life happens to me"; rich people focus on opportunities while poor people focus on obstacles; and rich people admire other rich and successful people whereas poor people resent rich and successful people.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 152: lutka, Beverly Hillsin historian ekshibitionistisin juutalaistyttö, etuoikeutetun elämän täydellisesti turmelema - toinen Jaakon kotka. Jos Bill ei osaa tulkita ja vetää nenästä Monica Lewinskyä, hänen ei pitäisi olla presidentti. Silloin virkasyytteeseen on todella syytä."
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 192: Masentavaa hyveellisyyshöpötystä, amer. säädyllisyyttä jota Pete Mencken piti sinisilmäisenä, Philip Wylie (kekä?) mamismina (momism), Reagan ydinarvoina ja eurooppalaiset historian tajuttomasti puritanismismina, omanarvontuntona, entisenä lojaalisuutena tai tunteikkaana juutalaisamerikkalaisena
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 198: Tuhon vuosisata (20. siis) joka kiertelee ja tuhoaa jutkurottia enemmän kuin mikään aiempi - miljoonat ja taas miljoonat tavalliset koukkunokat joutuvat kärsimään menetyksen toisensa perästä, julmuuden toisensa perästä, pahuuden toisensa perästä. Enemmän kuin puoli maailmaa joutui alistumaan patologiselle sadismille (ml kommunismille) yhteiskuntakäsitteenä, julman verovainon pelko säätelee ja kahlehtii kokonaisia yrittäjäyhteisöjä, yrittäjäyksilön elämän alennustila organisoidaan ja viedaan läpitte historiassa aikaisemmin tuntemattomassa mittakaavassa, vasemmiston aaterikolliset hajottavat ja orjuuttavat kansakuntia ja riistävät niltä kaiken kaiken, väestö demoralisoituu niin että se aamuisin sängystä noustessaan on kuin Babbitt: ei tunne pienintäkään halua kohdata uutta päivää, valkoinen nymfetti olikin vaan unta ja tytär käyttää väärää pahanhajuista hammastahnaa, kaikki tämän vuosisadan kammottavat koetinkivet!
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 205: Most of Wylie's major writings contain critical, though often philosophical, views on man and society as a result of his studies and interests in biology, ethnology, physics and psychology.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 206: Wylie applied engineering principles and the scientific method quite broadly in his work. His novel The Disappearance (1951) is about what happens when everyone suddenly finds that all members of the opposite sex are missing (all the men have to get along without women, and vice versa). The book delves into the double standards between men and women that existed prior the women's bowel movement of the 1970s, exploring the nature of the relationship between men and women and the issues of women's rights and homosexuality.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 208: Wylie's book of essays, Generation of Vipers (1942), was a best-seller during the 1940s and inspired the term "Momism" (excessive attachment to or domination by one's mother). Some people have accused Generation of Vipers of being misogynistic. His only child, Karen Pryor, is the author of a classic book for breastfeeding mothers, Nursing Your Baby, and has commented that her father was far from being a misogynist. Wylie's daughter, Karen Pryor, is an author who became the inventor of animal "clicker" training. Wylie's niece Janice Wylie, the daughter of his brother Max Wylie, co-creator of The Flying Nun, was murdered, along with her roommate Emily Hoffert, in New York in August 1963, in what became known as the "Career Girls murders" case.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 211: An article Wylie wrote in 1951 in The Saturday Evening Post entitled "Anyone Can Raise Orchids" led to the popularization of this hobby—not just the rich, but gardeners of every economic level began experimenting with orchids.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 262: Caro Llewellyn said that "Philip Roth: The Biography" distorted his friendship with the novelist: "My intimacy with Philip was not in keeping with the story Blake was trying to make. Write." In the biography, Bailey identifies her by the pseudonym Mona. He describes how she and Roth went through each other and were physically intimate but never had sex because he was unable to, even after taking Viagra. But Llewellyn said the scene Bailey described never happened, not quite like that.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 265: In an email, Bailey said he based the description of their relationship on information from Roth, who "tended to be truthful," adding that "the information was sufficiently harmless and, moreover, his identity was protected by a pseudonym ”. He took issue with the criticism that his book focused too much on Roth's intimate relationships with men and diminished the women in his life.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 266: Roth also gave Bailey copies of two self-published manus, "Notes to my Biographer," a 295-page rebuttal of his ex-wife Memoirs of Claire Bloom in 1996, and "Notes on a Slander-Monger", a response to the notes and interviews Miller had compiled.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 268: Literary history is full of moments of betrayal, when trusted confidants defied the wishes of the authors. Max Brod ignored Franz Kafka's order to burn his unpublished manus and diaries. Vladimir Nabokov and Philip Larkin's instructions to destroy the unpublished manus were rescinded by the heirs and executors, who not only retained but published them. Bailey did not publish Roths samizdats.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 270: "It would be for Philip a very It 's annoying to think that anyone can dig into it and choose thisthat he wants, "said close friend Bernard Avishai. Bernard never really learnt American.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 271: "I am against the holocaust of anything," said Claire Bloom. Roth was invested serving much of his own paper trail, said Avishai. He started donated their papers to the Library of Congress in the 1970s, and the institution amassed some 25,000 articles from 1938 to 2001, including correspondence with Bloom, Updike, Saul Bellow and Cynthia Ozick. After Roth's death, the library acquired more material, including correspondence, drafts, research notes, autobiographical notes, and other personal effects. Vitun hamsteri.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 274: Meanwhile, the estate has aggressively decided to control access to the Roth documents independently held at Princeton University, which the university has purchased.Born in 2018 to Roth's friend Benjamin Taylor. The cache includes a copy of "Notes on a Slander-Monger ", unpublished essays on topics such as money, marriage and illness, and a list of his relationships with women, with commentaries.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 280: When I was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, Philip came to the hospital and I called him a brave soldier. He sat on a plastic chair beside my bed and told more of his doctor and nurse jokes. I laughed despite myself. When the doctors came on their rounds after his first visit, I commanded a new respect. Word had spread and specialists who had previously answered my questions with no more than a dismissive wave of their hand were suddenly very attentive.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 283: ...And did you prick this patient's boil as I said? OH MY GOODNESS!
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 286: About a year after my diagnosis, in 2010, Philip invited me to join him for weekends at his country home. After that he dropped me, as it was getting too hard for him to turn me on my back. I didn't want to use the clothes drier but hung my panties on a line. Philip joked that I was turning his home into a trailer park but never insisted I use the dryer. I didn't need to cook, Philip planned where to eat and made the reservations. I used to like resting my ear on the hard metal of the implanted defibrillator that sat just below the skin of his chest to treat dysrhythmia.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 287: This was the second defibrillator he'd had after the first had to be replaced. Philip's original defibrillator had pride of place on the kitchen table. When he first handed it to me, I had no idea what it was and palmed the smooth metal disc in my hand. I almost dropped it when he started laughing and told me its original purpose. Over time, I came to appreciate it too and when I was alone in the kitchen, I often picked it up and held it in my hand. We called each other Toots. I found out Philip died when a friend called me at work. I swivelled around in my office chair and googled Philip Roth. There he was on the front page of The New York Times. Dead.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 294: Philip is buried at the Bard College Cemetery in upstate New York. He'd once considered "moving in" next to his parents at the Gomel Chesed Cemetery in Newark, New Jersey but there was no immediately close plot and the place had fallen into disrepair and Philip liked things to be very neat. I was thrilled to hear that Philip orchestrated every last detail of his own farewell. I was not invited.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 295: All and any religious overtones were strictly forbidden. There were no speeches, only readings of excerpts he'd selected from his books ahead of time, and a violin recital by a friend's daughter. He knew no one – no matter how well they really knew him and the people there at his graveside were his closest friends – could say it better than he could say it himself. Ingenting går opp mot kålpirog om hösten - som jag själv har lagat.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 298: The next time I'm in New York, I will take the Amtrak train service to Rhinecliff and an uber to the Bard cemetery to arrive late in the afternoon on a Saturday. I'll have with me my birthday radio, which I'll tune into WMNR as Susan makes her introduction and turn it up loud so Philip can sing along to I Did It My Way. It was his way all right, though it didn't amount to much.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 302: One day Philip handed me the manuscript of Notes for My Biographer. 'Take it,' he said, holding out the stack of pages held together by a large rubber band.'I want you to read it.' The book was a rebuttal to Claire Bloom's Leaving a Doll's House, Philip's ex-wife's account of their marriage, which was published in 1996. Many of the stories he'd already told me. He'd talked a lot to me about both Claire and his first wife, Margaret Martinson.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 307: Surely whatever money it might cost him was worth it to have his side of the story told. To me, knowing him as I did and having seen the documentation – the bags and bags of it, the medical files, the chequebooks – I believed him.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 319: Psykologi tunteekin empatiaa jatkuvien syytösten kohteeksi joutuneita vanhempia kohtaan. Moni syyttelijä tuntuu unohtavan, että olemme kaikki aikamme lapsia. Syytöksissä on paljon historiattomuutta. Niinkuin eurooppalaiset jotka syyttävät amerikkalaisia puritanismista, vittu sehän oli 1600-luvulla. Tai rokotevastaiset jotka näkee rokotepassissa Daavidin tähtiä kuin holokaustissa. Holokausti oli uhraus, jossa uhrieläin poltetaan ihan tuhkaxi. Papille ei jää makupaloja, jumalista puhumattakaan.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 348: Koska nuorhegeliläiset pitävät mielikuvia, ajatuksia, käsitteitä, joksikin aivan itsenäiseksi muuttamiaan tajunnan tuotteita yleensä ihmisten tosiasiallisina kahleina — aivan samoin kuin vanhahegeliläiset selittivät ne inhimillisen yhteiskunnan todellisiksi yhdyssiteiksi — käy ymmärrettäväksi, että nuorhegeliläisten tuleekin taistella vain näitä tajunnan illuusioita vastaan. Koska heidän kuvitelmiensa mukaan ihmisten suhteet, heidän kaikki tekonsa ja käyttäytymisensä, kahleensa ja rajoituksensa ovat heidän tajuntansa tuotteita, niin nuorhegeliläiset asettavat johdonmukaisesti ihmisille moraalisen vaatimuksen — korvata heidän nykyinen tajuntansa inhimillisellä, kriittisellä tai egoistisella tajunnalla ja kumota siten omat rajoituksensa. Tämä vaatimus tajunnan muuttamisesta toiseksi huipentuu vaatimukseen olevaisen uudenlaisesta tulkitsemisesta, ts. sen hyväksymisestä antamalla sille toisenlaisen tulkinnan. Nuorhegeliläiset ideologit ovat näennäisesti »maailmaa järkyttävistä» fraaseistaan huolimatta suurimpia konservatiiveja. Nuorimmat heistä ovat löytäneet toiminnalleen täsmällisen ilmaisun vakuuttaessaan taistelevansa ainoastaan »fraaseja» vastaan. He unohtavat kuitenkin, että noiden fraasien vastapainoksi he esittävät vain fraaseja ja että taistellessaan ainoastaan tämän maailman fraaseja vastaan he eivät suinkaan taistele todellista, olevaa maailmaa vastaan. Ainoana tuloksena tästä filosofisesta kritiikistä oli vain muutama ja sitä paitsi yksipuolinen uskonnonhistoriallinen selitys kristinuskosta; nuorhegeliläisten kaikki muut väitteet antavat vain lisäväriä vaatimukselle, että heidän mitätöntä selittelyään olisi pidettävä maailmanhistoriallisena löytönä.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 354: Aivan päinvastoin kuin saksalaisessa filosofiassa, jossa laskeudutaan taivaasta maahan, me nousemme maasta taivaaseen, me emme ts. lähde siitä, mitä ihmiset puhuvat, luulevat, kuvittelevat, emmekä myöskään puhutuista, ajatelluista, luulluista, kuvitelluista ihmisistä tullaksemme sitä kautta fyysisiin ihmisiin — me lähdemme todella toimivista ihmisistä ja heidän todellisen elämisensä prosessista ja osoitamme myös tämän elämisprosessin ideologisten heijastumien ja kaikujen kehityksen. Ihmisen aivoissa syntyvät utukuvatkin ovat heidän aineellisen, kokeellisesti todettavan ja aineellisista edellytyksistä riippuvaisen elämisprosessinsa väistämättömiä härmistymiä, sublimaatioita. Moraali, uskonto, metafysiikka ja muut ideologian lajit sekä niitä vastaavat tajunnan muodot kadottavat näin ollen näennäisen itsenäisyytensä. Niillä ei ole mitään historiaa, niillä ei ole mitään kehitystä, vaan aineellista tuotantoaan ja aineellista kanssakäymistään kehittävät ihmiset muuttavat tämän todellisuutensa mukana myös ajatteluaan ja ajattelunsa tuotteita. Tajunta ei määrää elämää, vaan elämä määrää tajunnan. Ensimmäisessä tarkastelutavassa lähdetään tajunnasta, ikään kuin se olisi elävä yksilö; jälkimmäisessä, todellista elämää vastaavassa tarkastelutavassa, lähdetään todellisesta elävästä yksilöstä ja tarkastellaan tajuntaa ainoastaan hänen tajuntanaan.
    xxx/ellauri138.html on line 356: Siitä missä spekulatiivinen ajattelu lakkaa, ja se lakkaa todellisen elämän parissa, alkaa siis todellinen, positiivinen tiede, ihmisten käytännöllisen toiminnan, heidän käytännöllisen kehitysprosessinsa esittäminen. Loppuvat korupuheet tietoisuudesta, todellisen tiedon on tultava niiden tilalle. Todellisuuden esittäminen riistää elinympäristön itsenäiseltä filosofialta. Sen tilalle voi tulla korkeintaan yhteenveto yleisluonteisimmista tuloksista, jotka ovat abstrahoitavissa ihmisten historiallisen kehityksen tarkastelusta. Todellisesta historiasta irrotettuina noilla abstraktioilla ei ole sinänsä mitään arvoa. Ne voivat kelvata ainoastaan helpottamaan historiallisen aineiston järjestämistä, osoittamaan sen yksityisten kerrostumien järjestystä. Mutta toisin kuin filosofia nuo abstraktiot eivät anna mitään reseptiä tai kaavaa, jonka mukaan historiallisia aikakausia voitaisiin sovitella paikoilleen. Päinvastoin, vasta sitten vaikeus alkaakin, kun aineistoa käydään tarkastelemaan ja panemaan järjestykseen — olipa kysymys jostain menneestä aikakaudesta tai nykyajasta — kun käydään käsiksi sen todelliseen kuvaukseen. Näiden vaikeuksien voittaminen riippuu edellytyksistä, joita ei suinkaan voida esittää tässä yhteydessä, vaan jotka käyvät selville vasta tutkittaessa todellisen elämisen prosessia ja kunkin aikakauden yksilöiden toiminnan tuloksia. Otamme tässä käsiteltäväksi eräitä noista abstraktioista käyttääksemme niitä ideologian vastaisesti ja selittääksemme ne historiallisten esimerkkien valossa.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 199: Ippolit is a 17-year-old boy who is dying of tuberculosis. An ardent nihilist, he yearns to be taken seriously and attempts to dramatically leave the world. He delivers rambling, self-absorbed, nihilistic speech entitled “A Necessary Explanation” to Myshkin, Nastasya, and Rogozhin, and many others at a party at Lebedev’s dacha. After this, he attempts to commit suicide by shooting himself with the gun he’s had since he was a child. This entire plan backfires, as everyone grows bored with his speech, and when it comes time to kill himself he fails to do so because there is no cap in the gun. After this incident, Ippolit’s illness shows progress and he eventually dies.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 211: Ippolit suddenly jumps up, all stressed that he has slept through something. He pulls a giant sheaf of papers out of his pocket and declares that he is going to read a long article that he has written. Everyone at the party is all, dude, that´s lame, but he can´t be stopped.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 214: Ippolit is really, really scared of dying. He´s still putting on his nihilist who-cares attitude, but he was totally thrown by the offhanded way a nihilist doctor told him he had at most a month left. He´s nineteen years old. That's a pretty hardcore thing to be dealing with at nineteen.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 218: (3) He had a really awful nightmare about being attacked by a horrible Kafkaesque scorpion-monster thing in his bedroom. In the dream, his mom called in his actually-dead dog to kill this reptilian thing, and it bites the dog while the dog is biting it.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 222: (4) Ippolit tries to figure out the point of living for two weeks. On the one hand, why not just die now and get it over with? But on the other hand, he feels like it's actually only now that he has a death sentence of sorts that he has really started to live. (Which, okay, guys, remember the story Myshkin told about the condensed man and how full of life his last few hours must be? There is definitely more to the idea that the person who knows he is about to die lives a very full life at the end—as Dostoevsky himself experience at his staged execution.)
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 224: (5) Ippolit is furious at the people he sees around him, each living life and having a lot of life to live. How could they be complaining about anything? If only he could have the rest of his life in front of him, then he'd really show everyone.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 226: (Of course he had the rest of his life before him. Everybody has. It was just rather short in his case in both directions. Eh, guys? Vai mitä jäbät?)
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 328: ‘The Eve of St. Agnes’ begins with the setting, the eve of the Feast of St. Agnes, January 20th (the Feast is celebrated on the 21st). It is horribly cold outside. A Beadsman, a professional man of prayer, is freezing in his church. He briefly hears music from the house that the church abuts. They are preparing a celebration and the guests all arrive in a burst of expensive clothing and plumage.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 330: Within the castle, Madeline, one of the main characters of this story is stuck dancing amongst the guests. She has been informed by older women that this is a night during which a virgin lady, after following certain rituals, might in her dreams see the image of her true love. She is distracted by these thoughts and unable to enjoy the dance.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 332: Farther away from the castle a man, Porphyro, who loves Madeline more than anything, is making his way to the house. He enters, unseen. If anyone finds him he knows that he will be killed. Madeline’s family hates him and holds his lineage against him. While sneaking through the house he comes upon Angela, one of the servants. He begs her to bring him to Madeline’s chamber so that he might show himself to her that night and solidify himself as her true love. After much complaining, she agrees and hides him until it is time.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 334: When Madeline finally enters the room, undresses, and falls to sleep, Porphyro is watching her. When he decides that she has fallen completely asleep he makes his approach and wakes her with the playing of a flute. She is ripped from a dream in which she was with a heavenly, more beautiful version of Porphyro and is aghast when she sees the real one. She believes for a moment that he is close to death.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 338: The two are able to make out outside the home without arousing suspicion and ‘The Eve of St. Agnes’ concludes with two characters, Angela, and the Beadsman, dying; their death acting as a symbol of a new generation that is now the focus of the world. This is one of Keaz' most loved poeams, with a wonderful happy ending (except for Angela and Beadsman).
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 340: Additionally, this idealistically romantic Romantic poem is known to have been written shortly after Keats fell in love with Fanny Brawne.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 349: The owl, for all his feathers, was a-cold; Pöllöäkin paleltaa höyhenpuvussaan;
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 353: His rosary, and while his frosted breath, Kun se laskee rukousnauhan helmiä,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 356: Past the sweet Virgin’s picture, while his prayer he saith. Jonka sielu pääsi taivaaseen jo aattona.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 359: His prayer he saith, this patient, holy man; Pomiloipa kärsivällisesti pyhä mies;
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 360: Then takes his lamp, and riseth from his knees, Ja ottaa taskulampun, päälle napsuttaa:
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 366: He passeth by; and his weak spirit fails Ne se ohittaa, ja melkein kompastuu,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 372: Flatter’d to tears this aged man and poor; Tuskinpa porkka-Mariasta ja Jee-suxesta!
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 373: But no—already had his deathbell rung; Kyynelet kastuttaa heppulin naamataulua.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 374: The joys of all his life were said and sung: Mut ei, hälle on jo tuonenkellot soineet,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 377: Rough ashes sat he for his soul’s reprieve, Valvomaan koko yön ja vähän lisää kuolemaan.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 414: Full of this whim was thoughtful Madeline: Mielevä mamsseli oli täynnä tätä oikkua:
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 429: Of whisperers in anger, or in sport; Ympärillä kosijoiden joukko pinkasee
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 447: He ventures in: let no buzz’d whisper tell: Hän työntyy sisään mitään hiiskumatta
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 449: Will storm his heart, Love’s fev’rous citadel: Sitä kauhistuttaa miekat ja piikkimatto
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 453: Against his lineage: not one breast affords Rotinkaista, selkään sille että roikaa!
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 463: He startled her; but soon she knew his face, Eukko hätkähti, muttei pelkää peikkoa,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 464: And grasp’d his fingers in her palsied hand, Tarttuu sen kynnettömään sormeen kädellä,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 465: Saying, “Mercy, Porphyro! hie thee from this place; Sanoen: Terse, Porfyyri! Antaa vetää täältä!
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 473: “More tame for his gray hairs—Alas me! flit! Sekin, hopeaselkä, eliskä lähe heti menee!
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 475: “We’re safe enough; here in this arm-chair sit, Täällon turvallista, istu tässä pallin päällä,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 481: Brushing the cobwebs with his lofty plume; Hämähäkit huiski tukkaan paneelista,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 498: “This very night: good angels her deceive! Just tänä yönä, tulkoon sille loppu hirveä!
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 507: But soon his eyes grew brilliant, when she told Mut pian on Porfyyri kuin konin koukussa,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 514: Flushing his brow, and in his pained heart Punastuu sen naama, on jäykkä housumakkara,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 526: “When my weak voice shall whisper its last prayer, Oltaisiin, menen vaikka valalle,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 554: Since Merlin paid his Demon all the monstrous debt. Niinkö Merlin maxan demonille hirmuvelan."
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 559: “Quickly on this feast-night: by the tambour frame Toimi nopeasti, tuolla tampuurissa
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 570: The dame return’d, and whisper’d in his ear Tantti palasi, ja kuiskas pojan korvaan
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 612: Full on this casement shone the wintry moon, Rogerin päälle tuli talvikuista hämyä,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 623: Anon his heart revives: her vespers done, Kyllä sykkii sydän Porfyrolla housussa,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 645: Stol’n to this paradise, and so entranced, Tähän paratiisiin kiemurtanut matosex
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 663: Affray his ears, though but in dying tone:— No nyt meni ovi kii, mitä hittoja.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 689: Thus whispering, his warm, unnerved arm Silleen supattaen tunkee kullinvarren
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 696: From such a stedfast spell his lady’s eyes; Mikä keinoxi, ei tiedä ja harva arvaa,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 708: Upon his knees he sank, pale as smooth-sculptured stone. Kyylää Porfyyrin huojuvaa toteemipaalua.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 728: “Oh leave me not in this eternal woe, Laula lisää kulta, älä tolla lailla vaivaa
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 744: “This is no dream, my bride, my Madeline!” Eise ollut unta, vaan totisinta totta.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 776: She hurried at his words, beset with fears, No pitää pitää kiirettä, eipä tässä muuta,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 790: With a huge empty flaggon by his side; Ei äsähdä kun linnut vaihtaa kortteeria.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 791: The wakeful bloodhound rose, and shook his hide, Verikoira herää, lotkauttaa korvia,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 792: But his sagacious eye an inmate owns: Mut tuttu tyttö, ei tarvi vääntää sorvia.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 801: And all his warrior-guests, with shade and form Se parooni, Madelinen isä nimittäin,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 806: For aye unsought for slept among his ashes cold. Kesken miljoonatta aavetta läxi meneen.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1051: Hegesippos (n. 110–180) oli varhaiskristillinen historioitsija ja harhaoppien vastustaja. Hänet luetaan kirkkoisien joukkoon. Se teki paaviluettelon. Gilbertin kootuissa oli nälkiintyneiden runoilijoiden luettelo. Näiden tiimien Body Mass Index-luvut oli varmaan ihan eri kymmenluvulta.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1070: Pierre François Lacenaire, född 20 december 1803 i Francheville, giljotinerad 9 januari 1836 i Paris, var en yrkeskriminell bedragare och mördare, som gått till historien genom sina Minnen (1836), nedtecknade på kort tid medan han väntade på sin avrättning. De utgavs första gången samma år som han dog och finns i svensk översättning sedan 1999. André Breton tog med en av Lacenaires dikter i sin antologi om svart humor, Anthologie de l'humour noir (1940). Hyvä Antero.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1078: During his trial, he fiercely defended his crimes as a valid protest against social injustice. He turned the judicial proceedings into a theatrical event and his prison cell into a salon. He made a lasting impression upon French society and upon several writers, such as Balzac and Dostoevsky.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1127: De vin et de sang diaprées, Viiniä ja verta valamiehistä,
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1208: Strangely, Raskolnikov begins to feel alarmed at the thought that Porfiry (joku poliisi) might think he is innocent. But Porfiry's changed attitude is motivated by genuine respect for Raskolnikov, not by any thought of his innocence, and he concludes by expressing his absolute certainty that Raskolnikov is indeed the murderer.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1213: He stops at Sonya's place on the way and she gives him a crucifix. At the bureau he learns of Svidrigailov's suicide, and almost changes his mind, even leaving the building. But he sees Sonya, who has followed him, looking at him in despair, and he returns to make a full and frank confession of the murders. What the fuck.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1239: Dostojevskin ja kirjallisuushistorian onneksi tulevan Venäjän kirjallisuuden kykloopin asuintoverina oli tuolloin aloitteleva kynäniekka Dmitri Grigorovitš, joka käsikirjoituksen luettuaan riensi näyttämään sitä muotirunoilija Nikolai Nekrasoville. Nekrasov itki ääneen. Hän ja Grigorovitš palasivat Dostojevskin luo neljältä aamuyöllä. Vielä samana aamuna Nekrasov koikkelehti käsikirjoitus kainalossaan aikakauden kirjallisen majakan, kriitikko Vissarion Belinskin luo karjuen: ”Uusi Gogol on syntynyt!”.
    xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1241: ”Taasko yksi Gogol”, puhisi Belinski. Romaani sai ristiriitaisen vastaanoton. Belinski ylisti, mutta useimmat muut kriitikot haukkuivat. Myöhemmin Belinski käänsi takkinsa ja alkoi hänkin väheksyä Dostojevskia. Tuli järkiinsä.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 49: November 21, 2021 is the 49th annual World Hooray Day. Anyone can participate in World Hooray Day simply by starving ten countries and threatening them with dire consequences if they don't behave (= humor us). This demonstrates the importance of military communications for securing peas. World Hooray Day was a response to the successful conflict between Egypt and Israel in the Fall of 1973. Since then, World Hooray Day has been observed by Sionistic people in 180 countries.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 51: Näitä "World This and That Day"s on aivan helvetisti, kaikenlaisia kotiinpäin vetopäiviä. Vaikkapa World Fisheries Day, jossa kansikuvan pikkukalat ovat uimassa iloisesti kohti pyydystäjän kitaa. Pyydystäjä pysyttelee nyt fixusti näkymättömissä. Kumman oikeuxia ne oikein puolustavat, kalojen vai niitä ahmivien apinoiden? No apinoiden tietenkin! World Fisheries Day: Championing the rights of Fishers.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 60: Brian McCormack, a Ph.D. graduate of Arizona State University, and Michael McCormack, a graduate of Harvard University, work together to promote this annual global event. Brian's career has since had a rocket start, Michael's is a steady falling trend.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 64: In the fall of his senior year, while his fellow students immersed themselves in writing theses, applying to graduate schools or kicking back and enjoying the good life, Michael J. McCormack '74 was busy starting another brain holiday. McCormack says he and his brother Brian McCormack wanted to do something to celebrate to the highly successful 1973 Arab-Israeli conflict.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 71: That first year, McCormack and his brother gained the support of 15 countries; in the 25 years since, they have reached almost eight times that many.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 77: "Whenever I have a tough night, I just remember that I've been in personal contact (pirsuna pirsunalmente) with 1.1 billion people in the Republic of China, and that makes things easier," McCormack says. When he's not sending letters out across the world, McCormack spends his time writing and acting in professional pornographic productions.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 84: Though the success and long life of World Hooray Day came as a surprise, McCormack says that he has wanted to write and act since he was seven years old and is not surprised to find himself doing it (= wanting) still decades later. McCormack, who took off for New York City immediately after graduation, said that his time at Harvard, though enjoyable, did not influence his career path.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 86: The editor of the first-year literary magazine and a writer for the Lampoon, a semi-secret Sorrento Square organization that occasionally publishes a so-called humor magazine, McCormack says his writing experiences during college simply confirmed his future plans. "I was headed where I was headed and [Harvard] was the mosta humorous place to be along the way," he says.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 93: McCormack says that although he has probably led a less conventional life than many of his fellow graduates, he has no regrets.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 94: "Having gone to Harvard gave me license to take some big risks," he said. "It's been a real big risk to do all of this, and I'm glad I did."
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 95: The founder of his own holiday, the author of several of Mahatma Gandhi's books, and the one-time pen pal of figures as diverse as M/S Queen Elizabeth II and Whoopi Goldberg, McCormack knows exactly what comes next.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 100: McCormack has recently been accepted to the University of California at Los Angeles pornographic film school; he and his silicon wife will be moving from Nebraska to Los Angeles in the fall. He says he is eager to begin erecting and also has future plans to break into film as a character actor. McCormack, who someday hopes to develop some of his (well, his, Mahatma's and Hemingway's) novels into movies, says he has waited to go to Hollywood until the time felt right and he had paid his dues.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 104: "I feel absolutely ready for pornographic movies," McCormack says. "It's this wild feeling of sturdiness and joy, kind of a creative euphoria."
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 128: The Soviets started an airlift of arms to Syria and Egypt. The American global interest was to prove that Soviet arms could not dictate the outcome of the fighting, by supplying Israel. Kenneth Pollack is a Jew so I would not trust his accounts of the war events. Saad el Shazly was on the other side, so hardly more trustworthy as a witness. Pientä epäselvyyttä oliko Egyptin 3. armeijakunta oikeasti aivan motissa, vai oliko mukana ehkä Kissingerin juonittelua, eze saisi kunnian Israelin pysäytyxestä ja tällä lailla Egyptin lipsumaan jenkkipuolelle. Mikä sitten ajan kanssa onnistuikin.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 153: Who is the Messiah the Jews are expecting to come? Why did the Jews reject Yeshua (Jesus) as their Messiah? These two questions often seem a mystery to many Christians as they read the Bible and study the prophets. Before Yeshua, the Jews were waiting for the Messiah, but when Yeshua came and died without more ado, he did not fulfill this expectation.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 155: Today, Judaism still waits for the coming of the Messiah, but who are they expecting? What qualifications need to met by the Messiah. Moses Ben Maimon (Maimonides), also called Rambam, or Little Drummer Boy, (1135-1204), wrote in his Thirteen Articles of Faith, that belief in the Messiah was required for a Jew to be resurrected. The 12th and 13th articles both deal with Redemption, which will come in the days of Messiah. Eli lisätään dekalogin perään nämä pykälät:
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 161: Tää oli Moshelta hyvä veto sikäli että nää lisäyxet päihittää kristinuskon tärkeimmät vetolaastarit, lunastuskaupan luottokortin ja taivastoivon. Maimonides further explains in his work on the Halakhic code, the Yad haHazaqa (“The Strong Hand”), also known as the Mishne Torah (Second Torah) the view of redemption and the role Messiah will play. Maimonides summarizes the Jewish expectation of the Messiah. But the expectation of Messiah, is not limited to Maimonides comments, quotes from the Talmud, Targum, Midrash, Zohar and other writings give us a vivid picture of the expectation in the Jewish world of the times of Messiah. Messianic expectation in Rabbinic times (A.D.135-1750) and in the time of Yeshua may have changed over the years. For example in the time of Yeshua, The Temple existed and Israel was not scattered abroad as is the case today. In the days of Maimonides, there was no Israel and no Temple, and Jews were persecuted in Europe. Here we quote from Raphael Patai’s work, The Messiah Texts on pages 322-327, his translation of the Mishne Torah, Maimonides writes the following.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 163: King Messiah will arise in the future and will restore the kingship of David to its ancient condition, to its rule as it was at first. And he will rebuild the Temple and gather the exiled of Israel. And in his days all the laws will return as they were in the past. They will offer up sacrifices, and will observe the Sabbatical years and the jubilee years with regard to all the commandments stated in the Torah. And he who does not believe in him, or he who does not await his coming, denies not only the [other] prophets, but also the Torah and Moses our Master. For, behold, the Torah testifies about him [the Messiah], as it is written,
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 169: I see him but not now ((Num. 24:17), this refers to David; I behold him but not nigh (ibid.) this refers to King Messiah; A star shall step forth out of Jacob (ibid.) this refers to King David; A star shall step forth out of Jacob (ibid.), this refers to David; and a scepter shall rise out of Israel (ibid.) this refers to King Messiah…
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 171: And think not that the Messiah must perform signs and portents and bring about new things in the world, or that he will resuscitate the dead, or the like. Not so. For, behold, R. Akiba was one of the greatest of the sages of the Mishna, and he was a follower of King Ben Koziba [Bar Kokhba], and he said about him that he was King Messiah. And he and the sages of his generation thought that he was King Messiah, until he was slain because of the sins. As soon as he was slain it became evident to them that he was not the Messiah. And the sages had asked of him neither sign nor a portent. And the essence of the matter is that the laws and ordinances of this Torah are forever and ever, and one must neither add to them or subtract from them.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 173: And if there should arise from the House of David a king, who studies the Torah and occupies himself with the commandments as his father David had, according to the written and oral Torah; and if he forces all Israel to follow the Torah and observe its rules; and if he fights the wars of the Lord—then he must be presumed be the Messiah. And if he succeeds in his acts, and rebuilds the Temple in its place, and gathers the exiled of Israel—then he certainly is the Messiah. And he will repair the whole world to serve the Lord together, as it is written, For then will I turn to the peoples a pure language that they may call upon the name of the Lord to serve Him with one consent (Zeph. 3:9)
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 177: The sages said that the only difference between this world and the days of the Messiah will be with regard to the enslavement to the kingdoms. It appears from the plain meaning of the words of the prophets that at the beginning of the days of the Messiah, there will be the war of Gog and Magog. And that prior to the war of Gog and Magog, a prophet will arise to straighten Israel and prepare their hearts, as it is written, Behold, I will send to you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord (Mal. 4:5) And he will come not to declare the pure impure, or the impure pure; not to declare unfit those who are presumed to be fit, nor to declare fit those who are held to be unfit; but for the sake of peace in the world….And there are those among the sages who say that prior to the coming of the Messiah will come Elijah. But all these things and their likes, no man can know how they will be until they will be. For they are indistinct in the writings of the prophets. Neither do the sages have a tradition about these things. It is rather, a matter of interpretation of the Biblical verses. Therefore there is a disagreement among them regarding these matters. And in any case, these are mere details which are not of the essence of the faith. And one should definitely not occupy oneself with the matter of legends, and should not expatiate about the midrashim that deal with these and similar things. And one should not make essentials out of them. For they lead neither to fear nor to love [of God]. Neither should one calculate the End. The sages said, “May the spirit of those who calculate the End be blown away” But let him wait and believe in the matter generally, as we have explained.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 179: In the days of King Messiah, when his kingdom is established and all Israel are gathered into it, the descent of all of them will be confirmed by him through the Holy Spirit which will rest upon him, as it is written, And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver, and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver ( Mal. 3:3), And he will first purify the Children of Levi and will say: “This is of priestly descent, and this is of Levitic descent.” And he will reject those who are not descended of Israel, as it written, And the Tirshatha [governor] said to them that they should not eat the most holy things till there stood up a priest with Urim and Thummin (Ezra 2:63) From this you learn that the presumption of descent will be confirmed, and those with established descent will be announced by the Holy Spirit. And he will establish the descent not from Israel [in general] but from each tribe and tribe. For he will announce that this one is from such and such a tribe, and this one from such and such a tribe….
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 193: 10 And I will pour on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication; then they will look on Me whom they pierced. Yes, they will mourn for Him as one mourns for his only son, and grieve for Him as one grieves for a firstborn. Zechariah 12:9-10
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 197: The rabbis have taught; The Holy One, blessed be He, will say to Messiah ben David, may he be revealed soon in our day!; “Ask of Me anything, and I shall give it to you, for it is written, The Lord said unto me, Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee, ask of Me and I will give the nations for thy inheritance (Psalms 2:7-8)” And when he will see that Messiah ben Joseph will be slain, he will say before Him: “Master of the World! I ask nothing of you except life! God will say to him: “Even before you said, ‘life,’ your father David prophesied about you as it is written, He asked life of Me, Thou gavest it him (Ps. 21:5) Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52a
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 199: And the land shall mourn, every family apart (Zech. 12:12). Two have interpreted this verse. One said: “This is the mourning over the Messiah,” and the other said: “This is the mourning over the Evil Inclination” [which will be killed by God in the Messianic days]. Yerushalmi Talmud Sukka 55b[10],[11]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 205: The idea of a “Suffering Messiah” to many in Judaism is a Christian concept, this is not the case however. In some rabbinical traditions, the Messiah, who was one of the first thoughts of God, is in heaven waiting for the day of redemption. In heaven, Elijah and the patriarchs attend to, him. In one scene, from the Talmud the Messiah sits at the gates of Rome unwinding and winding bandages of the suffering and poor, waiting for the call.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 207: R. Y’hoshu’a ben Levi once found Elijah standing at the entrance of the cave or R. Shim’on ben Yohai…He asked him: “When will the Messiah come?” He said to him: “Go, ask him himself” “And where does he sit? “At the entrance of the city [of Rome]” “And what are his marks?” “His marks are that he sits among the poor who suffer of diseases, and while all of them unwind and rewind[the bandages of all their wounds] at once, he unwinds and rewinds them one by one, for he says, ‘Should I be summoned, there must be no delay.’” R. Y’hoshu’a went to him and said to him; “Peace be unto you, my Master and Teacher!” He said to him: “Peace unto you, Son of Levi!” He said to him: when will the Master come?” He said to him: “Today.” R. Y’hoshu’a went to Elijah, who asked him; “What did he tell you?” R. Y’hoshu’s said “[He said to me:] Peace be unto you, Son of Levi!” Elijah said to him: “[By saying this] he assured the World to Come for you and your father.” R. Y’hoshu’a then said to Elijah: “The Messiah lied to me, for he said ‘today I shall come,’ and he did not come.” Elijah said: “This is what he told you: 'Today', If you but hearken to His voice’ (Ps. 95:7) (Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 98a)[12]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 209: The fifth house [in the heavenly Paradise] is built of onyx and jasper stones, and inlaid stones, and silver and gold, and good pure gold. And around it are rivers of balsam, and before its door flows the River Gihon. And [it has] a canopy of all trees of incense and good scent. And[in it are] beds of gold and silver, and embroidered garments. And there sits Messiah ben David and Elijah and Messiah ben Ephraim. And there is a canopy of incense trees as in the Sanctuary which Moses made in the desert. And all its vessels and pillars are of silver, its covering is gold, its seat is purple. And in it is Messiah ben David who loves Jerusalem. Elijah of blessed memory takes hold of his head, places it in his lap and holds it, and says to him: “Endure the sufferings and the sentence of your Master who makes you suffer because of the sin of Israel.” And thus it is written; He was wounded because of our transgressions, he was crushed because of our iniquities (Isaiah 53:5) until the time when the comes. (“Midrash Konen” BhM 2:29-30)[13]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 222: Today, the Jews every year commemorate the wait for Elijah at the Passover Seder meal; he is welcomed in every Jewish home with a large goblet of wine placed in the middle of the festive table for him. If he doesn't come, the guests present gobble the wine. According to some traditions there is a 45 day period following the death of Messiah Ben Joseph, before and the appearance of Messiah Ben David, its during this period, Elijah the forerunner of the Messiah makes his appearance.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 224: Elijah said to Rav Y’huda the brother of Rav Sala the Pious: “The world will exist for no less than eighty-five jubilees [that is, 85*50 = 4250 years], and in the last jubilee the Son of David will come.” He asked him: “In its beginning or at its end?” He answered: “I do not know.” [Rav Y’huda then asked:] “Will it [the last jubilee] be complete or not?” He said to him: “I do not know.” Rav Ashi said; “This is what Elijah told him; ‘Until the last jubilee expect him not; from then on expect him.’” So no hurry, there's another 260 jubilees (1300 years) or thereabouts to go. Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 97b[14]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 226: At that time Michael the great [celestial] prince will rise and blow the shofar three times…and Messiah ben David and Elijah will be revealed. And the two of them will go to Israel who will be [at that time] in the desert of the peoples, and Elijah will say to them; “This is the Messiah.” And he will return their heart [which will be faint] and will strengthen their hand… (T’fillat R. Shim’on ben Yohai, BhM 2:125)[15],[16]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 246: 23 "Thus he said: 'The fourth beast shall be A fourth kingdom on earth, Which shall be different from all other kingdoms, And shall devour the whole earth, Trample it and break it in pieces. 24 The ten horns are ten kings Who shall arise from this kingdom. And another shall rise after them; He shall be different from the first ones, And shall subdue three kings. 25 He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, Shall persecute the saints of the Most High, And shall intend to change times and law. Then the saints shall be given into his hand For a time and times and half a time. 26 'But the court shall be seated, And they shall take away his dominion, To consume and destroy it forever. Daniel 7: 23-26
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 248: And when the days of the Messiah arrive, Gog and Magog will come up against the Lord of Israel, because they will hear that Israel is without a king and sits in safety. Instantly they will take with them seventy-one nations and go up to Jerusalem, and they will say; “Pharaoh was a fool to command that the males [of the Israelites] be killed and to let the females live. Balaam was an idiot that he wanted to curse them and did not know that their God had blessed them. Haman was insane in that he wanted to kill them, and he did not know their God can save them. I shall not do as they did, but shall fight against their God first, and thereafter I shall slay them…” And the Holy One, blessed be He, will say to him; “You wicked one! You want to wage war against Me? By your life, I shall wage war against you! Instantly the Holy One, blessed be He will cause hailstones, which are hidden in the firmament, to descend upon him, and will bring upon him a great plague… And after him will arise another king, wicked and insolent, and he will wage war against Israel for three months, and his name is Armilus. And these are his marks; he will be bald, one his eyes will be small, the other big. His right arm will be only as long as a hand…..And he will go up to Jerusalem and will slay Messiah ben Joseph…. And thereafter will come Messiah ben David….And he will kill the wick Armilus…And thereafter the Holy One, blessed be He, will gather all Israel who are dispersed here and there. (Midrash waYosha[19])
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 252: The Hebrew Bible and rabbinical writing both teach the Messiah will come upon the clouds in the end of days to rescue his people from the nations.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 258: And now let us speak in praise of King Messiah who will come in the future with the clouds of heaven and two Seraphim [fiery angels] to his right and to his left, as it is written, behold with the clouds of heaven came one like unto a son of man (Daniel 7:13) (Pirqe Mashiah, BhM 3:70)[21]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 262: Maimonides in his Thirteen Articles of Faith, states belief in resurrection is an essential part of Judaism. The 12th article is faith in a personal Messiah, and the 13th is the resurrection. According to rabbinical teaching, the resurrection is linked to the coming of the Messiah. When the Son of David comes, the first person resurrected, will be the Son of Joseph, then the rest of Israel.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 268: Our master said two things in the name of R. Helbo: Why did the Fathers love to be buried in the Land of Israel? Because the dead of the land of Israel will be the first to come to life in the days of the Messiah, and they will eat [enjoy] the years of the Messiah. And R. Hama bar R. Hanina said: “He who dies abroad and is buried there, two deaths are in his hand….” R. Simon said: “If so, the righteous who are buried abroad will be the losers? [Not so,] for what does the Holy One, blessed be He, do? He hollows out the earth before them, and makes them into something like a skin bottle, ant they will roll and come until they reach the Land of Israel. And when they reach the Land of Israel He put the spirit of life into them they stand up.” (Midrash Tan. Buber, 1:214)[23]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 276: 7 Of the increase of His government and peace There will be no end, Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom, To order it and establish it with judgment and justice From that time forward, even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this Isaiah 9:7
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 278: Rabba said in the name of R. Yohanan: “Jerusalem of this World is not like Jerusalem of the World to Come. Jerusalem of This world—anybody who wants to go up to visit her, can do so; but to Jerusalem of the World to Come only those can go up who are invited to come…” And Rabba said in the name of R. Yohanan: “In the future, the Holy One, blessed be He, will elevate Jerusalem by three parasangs…Resh Laqish said: “In the future the Holy One, blessed be He, will add to Jerusalem a thousand gardens, a thousand towers, a thousand fortresses, and a thousand passages, and each of them will be like sepphoris in its tranquil days, and there were in it 180,000 marketplaces of merchants of pot dishes.” (Babylonian Talmud Bab. Bath. 75b)[24]
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 284: During his tour of the Eastern Empire in 131, the Roman emperor Hadrian decided upon a policy of Hellenization to integrate the Jews into the empire. Circumcision was proscribed, a Roman colony (Aelia) was founded in Jerusalem, and a temple to Jupiter Capitolinus was erected over the ruins of the Jewish Temple.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 286: Enraged by these measures, the Jews rebelled in 132, the dominant and irascible figure of Simeon bar Kosba at their head. Reputedly of Davidic descent, he was hailed as the Messiah by the greatest rabbi of the time, Akiva ben Yosef, who also gave him the title Bar Kokhba (“Son of the Star”), a messianic allusion. Bar Kokhba took the title nasi goreng (“prince”) and struck his own coins, with the legend “Year 1 of the liberty of Jerusalem.”
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 288: The Roman historian Dion Cassius noted that the Christian sect refused to join the revolt. The Jews took Aelia by storm and badly mauled the Romans' Egyptian Legion, XXII Deiotariana. The war became so serious that in the summer of 134 Hadrian himself came from Rome to visit the battlefield and summoned the governor of Britain, Gaius Julius Severus, to his aid with 35,000 men of the Xth Legion. Jerusalem was retaken, and Severus gradually wore down and constricted the rebels' area of operation, until in 135 Bar Kokhba was himself killed at Betar, his stronghold in southwest Jerusalem. The remnant of the Jewish army was soon crushed; Jewish war casualties are recorded as numbering 580,000, not including those who died of hunger and disease. Judaea was desolated, the remnant of the Jewish population annihilated or exiled, and Jerusalem barred to Jews thereafter. But the victory had cost Hadrian dear, and in his report to the Roman Senate on his return, he omitted the customary salutation “I and the Army are well” and refused a triumphal entry.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 292: In 1952 and 1960–61 a number of Bar Kokhba´s letters to his lieutenants were discovered in the Judaean desert.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 428: Eikä vieläkään World Hooray dayta. Mitä pannahista?
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 444: In Sheffield, there was Philosophy for Creatives on World Philosophy Day by Rosie Carnall.In this workshop you will develop and explore big questions in group discussion before working on your own piece of creative writing. The discussion activities open up creative thinking to get you inspired and full of ideas. There will be an opportunity to share from your work if you wish to. This workshop will be lively, fun, creative and thought provoking. "Mind-blowing!" according to a previous participant -in a good way! It includes structured activities and space to do your own writing. Come with an open mind and something to write on -thinking hats are optional.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 454: El Heraldo Chihuahua (Mexico) contributed this: “Every third Thursday of November, World Philosophy Day is celebrated, with the main purpose of revaluing the role of philosophical reflection in all aspects of our lives, in a world that seems to need more and more of this intellectual resource. The need to understand is imperative. The concern for thought, and especially for philosophical thought, appears worldwide when we face a global wave of irrational attitudes and resources that complicate our usual coexistence, generating problems of various kinds. But it is a concern that indicates that we still have conscience."
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 460: The Brussels team notes that Philosophy is often considered to be an intellectual activity and not very practical. However, a basic training in philosophy used to be considered essential before embarking on further study in a whole range of subjects. Over thousands of years, philosophy has been the mother of all sciences and a key driving force in human progress. This year we will be looking at how ‘philosophy in the classical tradition’ can actively contribute to finding solutions to our many crises, help us find more sustainable ways of living and develop the inner potential of the human being. The event will consist of five talks of about 20 minutes each, with a break after the third speaker. Topics covered will include philosophy as the art of living, learning how to think, inner development and transformation, the role of philosophy in promoting active citizenship and the universal laws and timeless principles of the perennial and hermetic philosophy. For those you can, the suggested donation for the live stream is £8 (£5cons), this will help to support our activities, thank you!
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 464: München, Germany. “Long Philosophy Night!” By Lange Nacht der Philosophie. World Philosophy Day is the ideal occasion for hosting a ‘Long Night’. We want to provide a platform for philosophy and bring together friends of wisdom. The whole thing should be a celebration of thinking, but also an opportunity for all those interested in philosophy to meet again or to get to know each other.The Long Night of Philosophy will now take place for the fourth time on November 18, 2021. For this we need your support!
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 468: Lévis, Québec. On the occasion of World Philosophy Day 2021 the Fleur de Lys Literary Foundation will host the conference‘Philotherapy or when philosophy helps us-A review of the main books on practical philosophy’. Panelists will discuss a A short history of philotherapy; More Plato, Less Prozac! Lou Marinoff, 1999; Plato, not Prozac! Philosophy as a remedy, Lou Marinoff, 2000.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 470: According to the Quebecois, "PHYLOTHERAPY", the term is no longer appropriate today because of the definition of the word "therapy" itself. The latter implies means "to cure or relieve illnesses". However, philosophical consultation does not aim at such an such an objective. Moreover, in some countries, the use of the term "THERAPY" is regulated and often reserved for the medical field. Finally, the term "PHILOTHERAPY" was initially used to draw attention to the fact that attention to the fact that philosophers were now offering consultations and opening specialized practices for this purpose specialized practices open to all. It was a good marketing move since the term has the attention of the media and the public. Today, the term "PHILOTHERAPY"has been abandoned in favor of "PHILOSOPHY CONSULTATION" offered by "PHILOSOPHES CONULTANTS". "CONULTANT" has even more traction now.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 476: Cerignola, Italy.‘Philosophical Paths, Philosophically -Agenda 2030’ by Club Unesco Cerignola. For one evening, our Old Earth is transformed into a long philosophical trail made up of the narrating voices of the young and old students of our schools. They will demonstrate, with their words, how the protection of the Environment, health, human rights, enshrined in the 2030 Agenda, are needs expressed by both ancient philosophers and current thinkers. Moreover, walking through the small streets that represent our historical heritage, we could be pervaded by those cultural values that identify us and inspire the desire to be more responsible.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 479: Conversations on topics such as empathy, human connections, and kindness in adverse moments will be addressed in rich encounters of philosophical knowledge. From the perspective of Plato, Seneca, Epictetus and classical philosophers from the Greek and Latin cradle, New Acropolis teachers will reflect on our current historical moment. An opportune moment to take advantage of philosophical knowledge, from love to wisdom, to break barriers of difficulties, obtaining a more humanistic sense of life. In all, eight (8) professors will be part of New Acropolis' annual event.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 481: Lisbon, Portugal. Dia mundia da filosofia by the Externato João XXIII .“In this atypical year, in which our lives are so busy and so full, we mark this day with simplicity. But meeting what is necessary and so primordial in the world of Philosophy: Shop to Think. Thus, without artifice, we leave to the community of the Externato João XXIII, the challenge of shopping to think and seek a question for an answer, this is a philosophical exercise par excellence. It intends to stimulate our critical and creative thinking. The story is told of a wise man who knew the right answer to any question from and about the Universe. It was 42. However, he did not know the question it was an answer to. Which question would you suggest?
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 483: Madrid, Spain. “Día mundial de la Filosofía” by Más Filosofía. Despite the exceptional situation in which we find ourselves and the restrictions that this entails in terms of the possibility of carrying out large-scale face-to-face events, Más Filosofía has decided to continue with our project, one more year, to celebrate World Philosophy Day. In this edition we will try to carry out both online and face-to-face activities (as long as the restrictions allow it). What about, we have not the foggiest as yet.
    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 500: 1) Russian Philosophical Society: International Conference "Philosophy and Society: 100 years of the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences" with the participation of the Board of Directors of the Institutes of Philosophy of the CIS countries with the invitation of other foreign participants, November 19, 2021 (World Philosophy Day). All interested teachers of the SNTL department were invited to participate in the conference. The form of participation was determined by each teacher individually (listeners, speakers). Some are good in one, others in the other. Students, undergraduates and postgraduates can also join this event but only as listeners.

    xxx/ellauri148.html on line 548: Seisoin pelästyneenä nurkassa käymälän vieressä ja puristin rintaani vasten nyyttiäni jossa oli melkein pelkästään omia käsikirjoituksia ja vähät kirjani. Piru nauroi sisälläni omia kuvitelmiani. Tiesin aivan hyvin että näin edessäni apinalauman historian olemuksen. Tänään puolalaiset rääkkäsivät juutalaisia, eilen venäläiset ja saksalaiset olivat rääkänneet puolalaisia, huomenna sakemannit rääkkäsivät jutkuja, ylihuomenna jenkit ja jutkut rääkkäävät miehissä rättipäitä. Jokainen historian kirja oli kertomus murhista, kidutuksista ja epäoikeudenmukaisuudesta, jokainen sanomalehti ja klikkiuutinen ui veressä ja häpeässä. Lukemistani filosofeista pessimistisimmät, Schopenhauer ja Von Hartman molemmat tuomitsivat izemurhan (unohtaen läpän "älkää tuomitko ettei teitä tuomittaisi"), mutta sillä hetkellä minä tiesin että on vain yksi pitävä tapa esittää vastalauseensa elämän kauhuille ja se on lingota Jumalalle hänen huonosti valittu lahjansa takaisin kuin Kristina-täti. Oli täysin mahdollista että jos minulla olisi tuossa vaiheessa ollut pistooli tai vyöpommi, olisin tappanut itseni listittyäni ensin summanmutikassa kasan huligaaneja.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 52: Vähemmällä vaivalla Eski ansaizee shamppanjakorkkinsa kuin meidän säälittävä airbnb. Olenko siis kade? Hetkinen hetkinen premissoidaan tilanne: en ole niin kade että haluisin olla turha julkkis kuten hän, vaan saisihan se mielellään olla yhtä köyhä ja tuntematon kuin mä. Eskin verkkokaupassa on paljon samaa kuin juutalais-kiinalaisessa Wishissä.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 117: Wish on tunnettu helppokäyttöisyydestään ja selkeydestään, ja se myy tuotteita laidasta laitaan äärimmäisen edullisilla hinnoilla. Etsiipä asiakas sitten arkisia perustuotteita tai outoja ihmetuotteita tai mitä tahansa siitä väliltä, Wishistä asiakas saa kaiken mitä ikinä tarvitseekaan. Tuotteet saattavat olla jopa 99 prosentin alennuksessa. Myös toimituskulut ovat alhaiset, mutta toimituksessa kestää 2-4 viikkoa, sillä tuotteet lähetetään pääosin Kiinasta. Wish toimii välikätenä myyjän ja asiakkaan välillä – Wish pitää asiakkaista huolen, jos tilauksessa ilmenee ongelmia. Wishillä ei ole omia tuotteita ja varastoja, vaan eri myyjät lähettävät tuotteet suoraan asiakkaille omista varastoistaan.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 121: Suomalaisille Wish eroaa kilpailijoistaan Ebaysta ja AliExpressistä siten, että Wish on käännetty suomen kielelle (Lahjatoivomus). Tuotteiden kuvaukset ovat kuitenkin volapyykixi. Wishistä voi ostaa melkein mitä tahansa. Sieltä voi ostaa mm. vaatteita ja asusteita, työkaluja, meikkejä, hygieniatarvikkeita, elektroniikkaa, keittiötarvikkeita sekä huonekaluja. Jos jokin tuote on maailmanlaajuisesti trendikäs, löytyy se lähes poikkeuksetta myös Wishin valikoimasta.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 200: Ekosofi, emeritakääntäjä; Rauhis-seminaarin kapelimestari
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 362: On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 52% based on 25 reviews, with an average rating of 5.93/10. The website's critics consensus reads: "Jesus Christ Superstar has too much spunk to fall into sacrilege, but miscasting and tonal monotony halts this musical's groove." On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 64 out of 100 based on 7 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 366: Conversely, Howard Thompson of The New York Times wrote, "Broadway and Israel meet head on and disastrously in the movie version of the rock opera 'Jesus Christ Superstar,' produced in the Biblical locale. The mod-pop glitter, the musical frenzy and the neon tubing of this super-hot stage bonanza encasing the Greatest Story are now painfully magnified, laid bare and ultimately patched beneath the blue, majestic Israeli sky, as if by a natural judgment." Arthur D. Murphy of Variety wrote that the film "in a paradoxical way is both very good and very disappointing at the same time. The abstract film concept ... veers from elegantly simple through forced metaphor to outright synthetic in dramatic impact."
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 374: Tim Rice said Jesus was seen through Judas' eyes as a mere human being. Some Christians found this remark, as well as the fact that the musical did not show the resurrection, to be blasphemous. Jesus var ingen Spartakus, för helvete. While the actual resurrection was not shown, the closing scene of the movie subtly alludes to the resurrection (though, according to Jewison's commentary on the DVD release, the scene was not planned this way). Some found Judas too sympathetic; in the film, it states that he wants to give the thirty pieces of silver to the poor, which, although Biblical, leaves out his ulterior motives. According to the black policeman in Whitstaple Pearl, ulterior motives usually means sex. The policeman is as talkative as John, and the detective cook lady looks a lot like Kirsi Riski. Not a comfortable thought.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 376: Biblical purists pointed out a small number of deviations from biblical text as additional concerns; for example, Pilate himself having the dream instead of his wife, and Catholics argue the line "for all you care, this bread could be my body" is too Protestant in theology, although Jesus does say in the next lines, "This is my blood you drink. This is my body you eat. Fresh cut from my butt."
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 381: Jesus Christ Superstar is a Rock Opera and (subverted?) Passion Play by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice. Originally released as a Concept Album in 1970 (when Lloyd Webber and Rice were still in their very early twenties, no less!), it made its way to the Broadway and London stage in 1971, and was adapted into a film directed by Norman Jewison in 1973. An updated version was recorded sometime around 2000 by Webber's Really Useful Group for PBS. A filmed version of the UK arena tour starring Tom Munchin as Judas was released on DVD and digital in 2012, and a live adaptation starring John Lennon as Jesus, Sara Bareilles as Mary Magdalene and Alice Cooper as Herod that aired on NBC in 2018. The show lives on in stage productions and tours (and even non-theatrical tribute albums from fans who were more attracted to it as an album than a show) to this day. Inspired by… The Four Gospels of The Bible (specifically the arrival in Jerusalem and subsequent crucifixion of Jesus), it chronicles the last seven days of Jesus' life, focusing mainly on the characters of Jesus, Judas and Mary Magdalene. It's regarded among Andrew Lloyd Webber's best works, which is not saying much. It's a pseudo-sequel to Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, though this took a bit more liberty with the source material and is considerably less playful.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 384: How much you end up sympathising with him is, of course, up to the interpretation of the audience. Either he was a pawn in God's/Jesus' plan, a pawn in the Pharisees' plans, a disgruntled terrorist, or a misguided ho-jay who ultimately chose his fate. (Or a mix).
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 386: If he's willingly betraying Jesus, or God is manipulating him, perhaps doing More Than Mind Control. After all, during "Damned For All Time," Judas keeps singing, "I really didn't come here of my own accord." Maybe it's that God had to offer a little bit of persuasion to have his death.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 389: A similar impression is given in the Bible. Tatu Vaaskivi argues on similar lines in his unforgettable Pyhä kevät. That or not wanting to be bossed around. Many, many adaptations have been made over the centuries, in which Judas, Pilate, and/or the Jews have been blamed to a greater or lesser, sometimes very extreme degree.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 391: In the 2000 film, Jesus comes off more than a little selfish in response to Judas in his early scenes, when Judas is protesting Mary's spending money on expensive foot ointments instead of the poor:

    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 396: On a different note, whether or not Christ is actually divine is ambiguous. There is evidence both for (his prophecy to Peter and Judas) and against (Jesus running from the lepers instead of healing them, and his prayers in Gethsemane) in the music, and it is typically left to the individual production to sort it out, usually in Judas' "Jesus Christ Superstar" number and after Jesus' death, where some productions will throw in a hint that he was resurrected later.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 405: However, if a show goes far enough with its violence, it may end up crossing the line not once but twice, as it goes around the planet and crosses it again. This second crossing takes the violence from sick back to funny in its ridiculous extremes. Similar to So Bad, It's Good, but done quite intentionally.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 407: King Herod is a genocidal king, one who ordered the mass-slaughter of Jewish babies, which is why Jesus was born in stable to refugee parents. He also is the one who determines Jesus is a fraud and sends him back to Pilate. Yet his song number is a bouncy plea for Jesus to perform miracles while bopping around. The 2012 version turns him into a talk show host, where he asks the viewers to vote if Jesus is a miracle worker or a fraud. He gets a round of applause after his song, despite the audience knowing that he sealed Jesus's fate and that he's set the ball rolling for the climactic crucifixion.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 413:
    By 'this simple feeling', do you mean love?

    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 419: When Ho Yay is done intentionally, it's Homoerotic Subtext, or possibly Implied Love Interest or Ship Tease. Occasionally called Les Yay when referring to two women. Queer Flowers may provide enough text to make this homoeroticism into subtext.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 421: In the related trope called Foe Yay, even rivals or mortal enemies can get this treatment by fans and writers alike, especially if they have a more friendly past together, or one is inordinately obsessed with the other. In Fan Fic, this is the direct cause of many a Slash Fic.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 423: In the 2018 live production, John Legend as Jesus is a Cuddle Bug, hugging his various followers and shaking the audience's hands when they reach out.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 425: Since the focal point of the play is the relationship between Jesus and Judas, some degree of Ho Yay was inevitable. But this degree? ...
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 427: Naturally, this varies between productions, and some lean into the brotherly angle of their bond instead. But there are a few stand-out moments in the lyrics and structure of the story themselves that encourage this interpretation:
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 429: Judas is extremely bothered by Jesus's tolerance for letting Mary Magdalene "kiss you and stroke your hair" and consistently picks fights with her when they're both onstage. Thematically, his problem with Mary is that she represents the degradation he perceives Christ as having fallen into, but it's easy to read jealousy into the dynamic.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 434: Arguably the strongest moment: when he is at absolute rock bottom, right before his suicide, Judas breaks into a reprise of Mary's "I Don't Know How to Love Him." When Mary sings it, it's implicitly about romantic love. And while Judas's version stops before "And I've had so many men before," it concludes with the anguished cry, "Does he love me, too? Does he care for me?"
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 442: To compare: in the 1973 version Judas's kiss of betrayal is Judas sneaking up from behind, giving Jesus a very quick light peck on the cheek. In the 2000 version, the two are looking each other directly in the eyes while crying. Then Judas gives him a deep, long, smooch and Jesus responds by briefly wrapping his arms around him before Judas pushes him off.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 457: Judas walks in on Jesus and Mary holding each other right after "I Don't Know How to Love Him", and, angered by it, flings them from the swing they're sitting on, helps Jesus up, and grabs his face as if he's trying to pull him in for a kiss. Jesus throws him off and a crushed Judas runs offstage leading into "Damned For All Time", leaving one with the implication that Jesus's rejection is a key factor in Judas's decision to betray him.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 467: You can even see Christ cracking up a little when Simon starts singing in his face. Corpsing?
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 469: "Corpsing" (also called "breaking") is actor-speak for having an unscripted fit of laughter onstage, so-called because the worst time to have the giggles is when one is playing a corpse. Corpsing doesn't necessarily mean that the material is especially funny (though, of course, it can be), or that the actors aren't taking it seriously; it just happens, and even excellent actors can corpse. Many actors try to cover this by covering their mouth and muffling the sounds they make. When this is done, a fit of laughter can rather haphazardly be turned into violent sobbing, with varying levels of success. Of course, that only helps if violent crying is appropriate for the scene (again, playing a corpse leaves you in trouble, as corpses don't cry either — usually).
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 479: Both. The Romans are a government, and governments have to walk a fine line when it comes to dissent, because the people outnumber law enforcement, and killing or imprisoning lots of dissenters, while effective in the short term, means you have fewer subjects. Pilate could put down the mob with violence, but why would he do all that over one guy who, frankly, is kind of a problem for Rome, anyway? It doesn't help that Jesus does nothing to speak in his own defense: Pilate gets frustrated with Jesus' answers and eventually says good riddance to Jesus and his obvious death wish.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 483: The Roman Empire has enough troops to brutally crush any Judean uprising (and indeed did so during the Jewish–Roman Wars that started only a few decades after Jesus's death). Pontius Pilate, the prefect of Judea, doesn't. If Judea rebels, there is a pretty good chance that Pilate will be killed by the mob, and even if he escapes he will be disgraced and his political career will come to an end. The fact that afterwards the Roman emperor will send in his legions to deal with Judea is cold comfort.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 485: Also, something of note is that, as much as he dislikes it, the mob is technically just calling him to do his job, which puts them mostly on the side of Rome ("We have no king but Caesar")...sort of. So by appeasing them THEN, he establishes himself as being both pro-Rome and pro-Jews.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 495: Paul Anton De Lagarde was born in Berlin as Paul Bötticher; in early adulthood he legally adopted the family name of his maternal line out of respect for his great-aunt who raised him. At Humboldt University of Berlin (1844–1846) and University of Halle-Wittenberg (1846–1847) he studied theology, philosophy and Oriental languages.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 497: Lagarde was an active worker in a variety of subjects and languages; but his chief aim, the elucidation of the Bible, was almost always kept in view.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 498: Parallel to his academic work, he attempted to establish a German national religion whose most striking manifestations were an aggressive anti-Semitism and expansionism.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 501: Germany is the totality of all German-feeling, German-thinking, German-willing Germans: In this sense, every one of us is a traitor if he does not consider himself personally accountable in every moment of his life for the existence, fortune and future of the fatherland, and each is a hero and liberator if he does.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 503: In his 1887 essay "Jews and Indo-Germans", he wrote: “One would have to have a heart of steel to not feel sympathy for the poor Germans and, by the same token, to not hate the Jews, to not hate and despise those who – out of humanity! – advocate for the Jews or are too cowardly to crush these vermin. Trichinella and bacilli should not be negotiated with, trichinella and bacilli should also not be nurtured, they would be destroyed as quickly and as thoroughly as possible. The problem is, guys like Paul Böttinger are like lice, there is no way to exterminate them for good. Where there are simians, their lice will also thrive.
    xxx/ellauri149.html on line 522: On August 25, 1967, Rockwell was shot and killed in Arlington by John Patler, a disgruntled former member of his party. Not a good idea to disgruntle members of your own party, especially when they are gun-happy neonazis.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 51: - Totta kai! Teistä miehistä ei ole edes luumun halkaisijoixi!

    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 59: Konnetaabeli (ransk. connétable < lat. comes stabuli, tallikreivi) on historiallinen arvonimi. Itä-Rooman keisarien ja frankkien valtakunnan hallitsijoiden hoveissa konnetaabeli oli tallimestari ja ratsuväen päällikkö. Myöhempinä aikoina nimitys tarkoitti Ranskassa armeijan ylipäällikköä, joka oli arvoasteikossa lähinnä kuningasta. Ranskan kuningas Ludvig XIII lakkautti konnetaabelin arvon 1627, mutta Ranskan keisari Napoleon I myönsi arvon veljelleen Ludvigille 1804. Napoleonin aikaa seuranneena restauraatiokautena arvo jälleen lakkautettiin.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 87: Her father Arsene Lupin was the grandson of the Marshal General of France, Maurice, Comte de Saxe, an out-of-wedlock son of Augustus II the Strong, king of Poland and elector of Saxony, and a cousin to the sixth degree to Kings Louis XVI, Louis XVIII and Charles X of France. This is probably where she got her very masculine gender expression. Unfortunately, Sand´s mother, Sophie-Victoire Delaborde, was a commoner, [citation was very badly needed], her mother was the daughter of a bird-seller, who, curiously enough, lived in the 'Street of the Birds' (Quai des Oiseaux) in Paris.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 93: Besides a white rabbit, Aurore greatly admired General Murat (especially when he wore his uniform) and was quite convinced he was a fairy prince. Her mother made her a uniform too, not like the general´s, of course, but an exact copy of her father´s. It consisted of a white cashmere vest with sleeves fastened by gold buttons, over which was a loose pelisse, trimmed with black fur, while the breeches were of yellow cashmere embroidered with gold. The boots of red morocco had spurs attached; at her side hung a sabre and round her waist was a sash of crimson silk cords. In this guise Aurore was presented by Murat to his friends, but though she was intensely proud of her uniform, the little aide-de-camp found the fur and the gold very hot and heavy, and was always thankful to change it for the black silk dress and black mantilla worn by Spanish children. One does not know in which costume she must have looked most strange. I would vote for the Scrooge McDuck style high hat.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 95: Sand was one of many notable 19th-century women who chose to wear male attire in public. For this, she was better known in anglo-saxon circles than Balzac and Hugo in the 1830´s. In 1800, the police issued an order requiring women to apply for a permit in order to wear male clothing. Some women applied for health, occupational, or recreational reasons (e.g., horse riding), but many women chose to wear pants and other traditional male attire in public without receiving a permit. They did so as well for practical reasons, but also at times to subvert dominant stereotypes and to practice same sex relationships.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 97: Sand was one of the women who wore men´s clothing without a permit, justifying it as being less expensive and far sturdier than the typical dress of a noblewoman at the time. Haha. In addition to being comfortable, Sand´s male attire enabled her to circulate more freely in Paris than most of her female contemporaries, and gave her increased access to venues from which women were often barred, even women of her social standing, like all-male steam baths. Also scandalous was Sand´s smoking tobacco in public; neither peerage nor gentry had yet sanctioned the free indulgence of women in such a habit, especially in public (though Franz Liszt´s paramour Marie d´Agoult affected this as well, smoking even larger cigars than George).
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 101: Honoré de Balzac, who knew Sand personally, once said that if someone like himself thought that she wrote badly, it was because his own standards of criticism were inadequate. He also noted that her treatment of imagery in her works showed that her writing had an exceptional subtlety, having the ability to "virtually put the image in the word, and the lyre you know where." Alfred de Vigny referred to her as "Sappho".
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 103: Fyodor Dostoevsky "read widely in the numerous novels of George Sand" and translated her La dernière Aldini in 1844, but "discovered to his dismay that the work had already appeared in Russian". In his mature period, he expressed an ambiguous attitude towards her. For instance, in his novella Notes from Underground the narrator refers to the sentiments he expresses as, "I laugh off at that point the European, inexplicably lofty subtleties of George Sand".
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 105: The American poet Wilt Whatman cited Sand´s novel Consuelo as a personal favorite, and the sequel to this novel, La Comtesse de Rudolstadt, contains at least a couple of passages that appear to have had a very direct influence on him. As a gayperson to another gayperson. Virginia Woolfilla oli varmasti samansuuntaisia internal strifejä vaikkei käyttänytkään miehen nimeä.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 203: Practically everyone knows Godard’s classic pronouncement, “All you need for a movie is a girl and a putz,” but a 1989 interview contains one of the more caustic charges Godard levels at cinema, that “Cinema is an ideology based on men living out through their imaginations what they could not do to women.” This chauvinist pig who openly played out his own marital problems with Anna-Kaarina in their collaborations of the ‘60s, now abrazes other toxic males for similar diversions.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 214: The theme of Salome is one that Moreau returned to time and again. The artist explored the subject in more than one hundred sketches and drawings as well as in numerous paintings—ranging from highly elaborate to sketchily rendered—and even in sculpture (both Salome and The Apparition figured in Moreau’s waxworks). Moreau was not alone in his passion for the theme of Salome, as other famous artists — Lucas Cranach, Caravaggio, Titian, Guido Reni, Artemisia Gentileschi, Aubrey Beardsley, and Nabil Kanso, to name just a few — shared this interest. Selkeästi perverssiä jengiä.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 222: Its symbolism is ambiguous. Does it signal lust, or is it a symbol of purity? Mieti sitä. Moreau’s typically enigmatic approach made him a target for the promoters of Naturalism, most notably Émile Zola, who accused him of retreating into his dreams and offering an artistic response to the challenge posed by science—one that couldn’t possibly have value in the modern age. Such criticism hurt him deeply and only fueled Moreau’s purposeful cultivation of ambiguity.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 223: Moreau’s contemporaneous viewers also focused on Salome as “femme fatale” (perhaps most famously, the Symbolist novelist and art critic J. K. Huysmans in his novel À rebours).
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 228: Furthermore, it is quite possible that Moreau was acquainted with Flaubert’s 1862 Salammbô and with Mallarmé’s 1864 Hérodiade, which would have influenced his approach.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 237: Matho (joka on ruumiikas kuten Flaubert izekin) steals the sacred veil of Carthage, the Zaïmph, prompting Salammbô to enter the mercenaries´ camp in an attempt to steal it back. This gives occasion for a round of juicy copulation. Believing each other to be divine apparitions, they make love, not war.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 239: Matho is tortured before his execution; Salammbô, witnessing this, dies of shock. The Zaïmph has brought death upon those who touched it. What shock? Sounds more like a case of poisoning:
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 247: Tää Alamyn Salome on musta vetävämpi. Tanssit on tanssittu, eiköhän nakata tää irtopää rodeen. Kuvan nimi on kaikessa lyhykäisyydessään nasevasti https://l450v.alamy.com/450v/w58a5m/salom-with-the-head-of-john-the-baptist-salom-is-the-daughter-of-herodias-and-herod-philip-her-mother-wanted-to-remarry-herod-antipas-the-preacher-john-the-baptist-had-condemned-this-marriage-and-was-imprisoned-on-it-on-his-birthday-herod-antipas-promised-to-give-salom-what-she-wanted-when-she-danced-for-him-her-mother-herodias-urged-her-to-ask-the-head-of-john-the-baptist-on-a-platter-against-his-will-herod-kept-his-promise-after-the-dance-the-severed-head-was-carried-on-a-saucer-new-testament-matthew-14-6-11-mark-6-14-29-salom-is-presented-here-as-an-eastern-princess-she-w58a5m.jpg.
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 249: his-marriage-and-was-imprisoned-on-it-on-his-birthday-herod-antipas-promised-to-give-salom-what-she-wanted-when-she-danced-for-him-her-mother-herodias-urged-her-to-ask-the-head-of-john-the-baptist-on-a-platter-against-his-will-herod-kept-his-promise-after-the-dance-the-severed-head-was-carried-on-a-saucer-new-testament-matthew-14-6-11-mark-6-14-29-salom-is-presented-here-as-an-eastern-princess-she-w58a5m.jpg" />
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 355: Ja projisoi sit pahat aikeensa tohon särkyneeseen ruukkuun. Moreaun full frontal nudity-versiossa Salomesta Huismannin mielestä "paljastui ihmisolennon sukupuolinen himo koko kauheudessaan. Vasta nyt hän oli todellinen portto, joka totteli kiihkeää, julman naisellista luontoaan. Hän oli elävä ja jalompi, mutta myös kesyttömämpi; kammottavampi, mutta myös kiihottavampi." Toisaalta ja toisaalta. "Hän elvytti miehen horroxeen vaipuneet aistit voimallisemmin ja murskasi tämän tahdon paljon tehokkaammin kuin aiempi Salome. Nyt hänessä oli samaa viehätysvoimaa kuin valtavassa veneerisessä kukassa, joka on itänyt jumalattomissa kukkapenkeissä ja versonut epäpyhissä kasvihuoneissa ." Ja tämä kaikki vain koska alaharjaan oli suora sihti! Hei Huismanni sanoo Moreauta illuminaataxi! Ahhaa! Salaliittovehkeitä!
    xxx/ellauri154.html on line 361: Ecological factors were also probably a precursor to eusociality. For example, the sponge-dwelling shrimp depend upon the sponge´s feeding current for food, termites depend upon dead, decaying wood, and naked mole rats depend upon tubers in the ground. These resources have patchy distributions in the environments of these animals. In places there is a surplus, in others next to nothing. This means that resources must be defended for the group to survive. These requirements make it a necessity to have high social order for the survival of the group.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 51: Yesterday's fairy tale is today's fact. The magician is only one step ahead of his audience.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 98: Jacob (Jacques) Jordaens was a Flemish painter, draughtsman and tapestry designer known for his history paintings, genre scenes and portraits. After Peter Paul Rubens and Anthony van Dyck, he was the leading Flemish Baroque painter of his day. Unlike those contemporaries he never travelled abroad to study Italian painting, and his career is marked by an indifference to their intellectual and courtly aspirations. In fact, except for a few short trips to locations in the Low Countries, he remained in Antwerp his entire life. As well as being a successful painter, he was a prominent designer of tapestries.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 100: Like Rubens, Jordaens painted altarpieces, mythological, and allegorical scenes, and after 1640—the year Rubens died—he was the most important painter in Antwerp for large-scale commissions and the status of his patrons increased in general. However, he is best known today for his numerous large genre scenes based on proverbs in the manner of his contemporary Jan Brueghel the Elder, depicting The King Drinks and As the Old Sing, So Pipe the Young. Jordaens' main artistic influences, besides Rubens and the Brueghel family, were northern Italian painters such as Jacopo Bassano, Paolo Veronese, and Caravaggio.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 102: Jordaen's personal interaction with the Bible was strengthened by his conversion from Catholicism to Protestantism. Like Rubens, he studied under Adam van Noort, who was his only teacher. During this time Jordaens lived in Van Noort's house and became very close to the rest of the family. 8 years later, after joining the tapestry painters' guild, 1616, he married his teacher's eldest daughter, Anna Catharina van Noort, with whom he had three children. Perhaps the big butt belonged to Anna Catharina.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 104: Jordaens’s large painting of The Wife of King Candaules displaying herself to Gyges is in the Nationalmuseum, in Stockholmii. In the large painting, the Queen is depicted lifesize, seen from behind, standing before a canopied bed. She is virtually naked, but for a string of pearls and a lace-trimmed cap. Just as she is about to step into her bed, she pauses and casts a backward glance, apparently addressing the viewer with a conspiratorial smile. On the far right of the picture, Gyges can be glimpsed craning his head through a gap in the curtain, with the King close behind him.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 107: In the seventeenth century, the story of King Candaules’s wife was seen as a moral lesson, warning against violations of the marital bedchamber. The theme was treated by the poet Jacob Cats in his Toneel vande mannelicke Achtbaerheyt, in which he devoted no less than eighty-six verses to the tale of Candaules and Gyges, and illustrates the scene in the royal bedchamber with a print by Pieter de Jode after Adriaen van de Venne. In the print the Queen is seen half naked from behind. Candaules is already in bed, and the Queen looks at Gyges, who is largely concealed behind the wallhangings. The moral of the story is clarified by a scene on a smaller scale in the background, showing Candaules being slain by Gyges. The print no doubt served as an inspiration for several other later renditions of the theme in Northern Netherlandish painting, including works by Frans van Mieris the Elderv, and Eglon van de Neervi.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 109: Vähän siedettävämpi perätarjonta on tämä William Ettyn yritys samasta aiheesta. William Etty (1787–1849), the seventh son of a York baker and miller, had originally been an apprentice printer in Hull, but on completing his seven-year apprenticeship at the age of 18 moved to London to become an artist. Strongly influenced by the works of Titian and Rubens, he submitted a number of paintings to the Royal Academy of Arts and the British Institution, all of which were either rejected outright or drew little attention when exhibited. In 1821 he finally achieved recognition when the Royal Academy accepted and exhibited one of his works, The Arrival of Cleopatra in Cilicia (also known as The Triumph of Cleopatra). Cleopatra was extremely well received, and many of Etty's fellow artists greatly admired him. He was elected a full Royal Academician in 1828, beating John Constable to the position. Jordaens and Etty both contrasted Nyssia's pale flesh against dark red drapery and showed her in a similar pose. Jordaens's painting has hung in Sweden since the 17th century, and it is unlikely Etty was aware of it. Se tuskin löytyi googlaamalla.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 111: his_Wife_to_Gyges.JPG/600px-Etty-Candaules_King_of_Lydia_Shews_his_Wife_to_Gyges.JPG" />
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 146: Dybbuk paasaa jakeita ja lainauxia gemarasta midrasista ja muista pyhistä kirjoista. Ilkiö kun on se usein vääntelee pyhiä sanoja niin että ne saavat rivon merkityxen. Kuulostaapa tutulta. Tääkin on paljastavaa: pyhän vastakohta on holtiton lisääntyminen.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 154: This website is constantly being improved. We would appreciate hearing from you demons.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 178: Depending upon the translation used (eg. the Hebrew Transliteration “Eth Cepher”) you may get a clearer view of what actually happened. The Moabites were made to lie down upon the the ground. They were measured. Those measuring one length of cord were spared but the giants - a hybrid breed were executed. This is in keeping with the killing of the charge hybrids Goliath of Gath and his brothers. Please note that Og of Bashan was a giant, as were the Rephaim and the Anakin Skywalker. The Book of Echinococh as recommended by Peter, Paul and Mary explains further who “the sons of God” actually were and really clarifies Genesis 6 and why our Mighty Mouse had to destroy the earth. The “sons of God” were not human and hence their offspring were no longer a scale image of God (who had shrunk a lot like a leaky balloon due to all the emanation) so they could never have salivation. The Eth Cepher gives a much clearer translation of the Hebrew than the English versions and so we see that the decimated gorillas were quite malevolent towards God and His more recently created short order cooks - especially people.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 204: Baal Shem (Hebrew: בַּעַל שֵׁם, pl. Baalei Shem) is a title for a historical Jewish practitioner of Practical Kabbalah and miracle worker. Employing the names of God, angels, Satan and other spirits, Baalei Shem heal, enact miracles, perform exorcisms, treat various health issues, curb epidemics, protect people from disaster due to fire, robbery or the evil eye, foresee the future, decipher dreams, and bless those who sought his powers.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 208: The leading Kabbalist Isaac Luria (1534–1572) forbade people of his time to use Practical Kabbalah. As the Temple in Jerusalem is not standing, and no one possesses the ashes of the Red Heifer, people are unable to become pure, he stated. Fair enough. Without the ability to reach a state of purity, Practical Kabbalah can be very damaging, he taught.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 210: Baal Shem Tov was the stage name of Rabbi Israel ben Eliezer, a Polish rabbi and mystical healer known as the . His teachings imbued the esoteric usage of practical Kabbalah of Baalei Shem into a spiritual movement, Hasidic Judaism. While a few other people received the title of Baal Shem among Eastern and Central European Ashkenazi Jewry, the designation is most well known in reference to the founder of Hasidic Judaism. Baal Shem Tov, born in the 17th century Kingdom of Poland, started public life as a traditional Baal Shem, but introduced new interpretations of mystical thought and practice that eventually became the core teachings of Hasidism. In his time, he was given the title of Baal Shem Tov, and later, by followers of Hasidism, referred to by the acronym BeShiT. He disavowed traditional Jewish practice and theology by encouraging mixing with non-Jews and asserting the sacredness of everyday corporal existence.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 212: During his life, he was lucky to be able to devote time to prayer and contemplation, traditional practices within the realm of contemplative Kabbalah. There, he was able to learn the skills to become a Ba'al Shem, and practiced on neighboring townspeople, including both Jews and Christians. Modern texts state that he underwent a hitgalut (revelation)' by the age of 36.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 214: Besides contemporary methods established by Lurianic Kabbalah, Ba'al Shem Tov learned and took part in traditional practices of Practical Kabbalah. As a stroke of genius, Ba'al Shem Tov taught that one could remove asceticism from the practice of Judaism. This allowed a larger array of people to become devout within Judaism, and therefore within Hasidism. Moreover, he taught that the letters, in contrast to the words, were the key element of sacred texts. Therefore, intellectual and academic skills were no longer necessary to reach mastery of the sacred texts. Average skills in solving crossword puzzles and sudoku were enough. Another point in favor of hasidism.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 216: From the 1730s, Baal Shem Tov (BeShiT) headed an elite chirurgic mystical circle, similar to other secluded Kabbalistic circles such as the contemporary Klaus (Close) in Brody. Unlike past mystical circles, they innovated with the use of their psychic heavenly intercession abilities to work on behalf of the common Jewish populace. From the legendary hagiography of the BeShiT as one who bridged elite mysticism with deep social concern, and from his leading disciples, Hasidism rapidly grew into a populist revival movement with the funny hats. That's the point, there are only so many members of the elite, while the hoi polloi, though poorer, count in zillions. Want to have a large following, lower the entrance fee.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 220: The Baal Shem Tov taught that a superior advantage would accrue in Jewish service with incorporating materialism within spirituality. In Hasidic thought, this was possible because of the essential Divine inspiration within Hasidic expression. In its terminology, it takes a higher Divine source to unify lower expressions of the material and the spiritual. In relation to the Omnipresent Divine essence, the transcendent emanations described in historical Kabbalah are external. This corresponds to the Kabbalistic difference between the Or (Light) and the Maor (Luminary). Essential Divinity permeates all equally, from the common folk to the scholars. Well, perhaps a little fuzzy, but the main point is that everyone can participate in the fun.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 224: This section is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Traditional Jewish philosophical, ethical and mystical thought describes the two fundamental emotions in spiritual devotion, of "love of God" and "fear of God". Hasidic thought gives these standard notions its own interpretations.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 231: The grand masters of Mussun Mussun would counter that such a path has the danger of escapism, as understanding oneself is the basis of mature consciousness. In some Hasidic schools, this pitfall of mystical escapism with more external forms of emotional enthusiasm are avoided, but that kills a lot of the fun.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 237: Hasidism, initially, rejected the focus on personal reward, or ultimately also the ideal of material self-advancement, as too self-centred. Before the magnificent awareness of Divine majesty, through the mystical path, the automatic response is sincerity and a desire to nullify oneself (nollata polla) in the Divine presence. It is more worthwhile to reject even refined levels of self-centred spiritual advancement from advanced Yeshiva study to help another male person in their spiritual and even physical needs. This attitude has also spread in recent times to non-Hasidic Lithuanian Jewish Orthodoxy, as part of the spiritual campaign of the Baal Teshuvah movement.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 239: The Lithuanian rabbis (like Itchele's mom's folks) feared that Hasidism demoted the traditional importance on Torah study, from its pre-eminent status in Jewish life. Some Hasidic interpretations saw mystical prayer as the highest activity, but their practitioners thought that through this, all their Jewish study and worship would become easier. By the mid-19th Century, the schism between the two interpretations of Eastern European Judaism had mostly healed, as Hasidism revealed its dedication to bookwormship, and the Lithuanian World saw advantages in the Hasidic shared fun.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 243: The first leader of Lubavitch hasids, Schneur Zalman of Liadi kept in his desk some of his unpublished Hasidic mystical writings. A fire broke out that destroyed them. Afterwards, he asked if anyone had secretly copied them. His close associates replied that no one had, since he had written atop their pages the warning of "Joka tämän varastaa sitä piru rakastaa". Schneur replied "what has become of Hasidic self-sacrifice for the sake of Heaven?"
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 246: The "love of God" and "fear of God" receive different interpretations across the historic texts of Judaism, from their different appellations in the Song of Songs, Talmud, Medieval Jews, Mussunmussun, and the Kabbalah. For Maimonides, love and fear came from the wonders of Creation, which could reveal the presence of their Creator.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 250: The strategic advantage of Hasidism over Kabbalah is its ability to get by without the esoteric terms of Kabbalah. This is brought out most in the anecdotes told about the beloved Masters of Hasidism, as well as in the funny parables they told to illustrate ideas. One such parable differentiates between superficial forms of love of God and spiritual reward, with true forms of selfless love:
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 252: A powerful King was grateful to two simple poor people for their devotion, and decided to show his gratitude. The poor labourers had never been into the palace before, but had only seen the King at state occasions. After receiving their invitations to see the King, in trepidation and excitement, they approached the palace. As they entered, they were amazed to behold the magnificence of the palace. One servant was so enamoured of these riches, that he stopped in the great halls to delight in their beauty. He never progressed beyond these chambers. Meanwhile, the other servant was wiser, and his desire was only for the King. The beautiful ornaments did not distract him, as he entered the inner chamber, where he delighted in beholding the King himself, stark naked.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 254: Likewise a story is told of how in moments of mystical rapture, Schneur Zalman of Liadi would be seen rolling on the floor, exclaiming to his housekeeper: "God, I don't want your Garden of Eden (Heavenly World), I don't want your World-to-Come (Messianic days), I just want You!".
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 263: Once, when the Baal Shem Tov was on a journey, Sabbath overtook him on the highway. He stopped the wagon, and went out into the field to perform the services that welcome the coming of Sabbath, and to remain there until the Sabbath was ended. On the field, a flock of sheep were grazing. When Baal Shem Tov raised his voice a tad and spoke the prayers that welcome the Sabbath as the coming of a Bride, the sheep rose upon their hind legs, and lifted their heads in the air, and stood like people listening. And so they remained in wrapt attention for two hours, all the while that the Baal Shem spoke.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 265: In the tale, the sheep become aware in their instinctive feelings of the existence of a stranger on their pasture. According to the tale, Baal shem Tov's prayers were loud enough for even hard of hearing to perceive this.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 267: Baal Shem Tov's mysticism taught that the sincere common folk could be closer to God than a scholar who has self-pride in his accomplishments.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 268: Rahvaanomaiset mutta devekutit hasidit tarrautuvat Jehovaan kuin liima, kuin kärpäspaperi, kuin Kapteeni Capun laastari. In perhaps the most characteristic Hasidic story, the Baal Shem Tov's conduct instructed his new mystical teaching and boundless delight in the unlettered deveikut of the simple folk:
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 270: The saintly prayers of Baal Shem Tov and his close circle were unable to lift a harsh shortage of drinkware they perceived one Rosh Hashanah (New Year). After extending the prayers beyond their time, the drought remained. An unfettered shepherd boy entered and was deeply envious of those who could read the holy day's prayers. He said to God "I don't know how to pray, but I can make the noises of the animals of the field. With great feeling, he cried out, "Cock-a-doodle-do. God have mercy!" Immediately, joy overcame the Baal Shem Tov, and he hurried to fetch the cellar key. Afterwards, he explained that the heartfelt prayer of the shepherd boy reminded him where he had mislaid the key, and the drought was lifted.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 276: Different Hasidic groups evolved their own distinctive styles of niggun. Followers customarily gather around on Jewish holidays to sing in groups, receive and give spiritual inspiration, and celebrate brotherly camaraderie. Hasidic custom venerated pilgrimage to the particular Rebbe one had allegiance to, either to gain a private audience or to attend their public gatherings (Tish/Farbrengen). The celebrations give over his Torah teachings, sometimes personal messages, and are interspersed with inspirational niggunim.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 284: As he recited the blessing prior to the act, he dwelt on the holy commandment he was about to perform. "Blessed art Thou, God..", he began. "..Who commands us concerning Shechita", he concluded in such fervour that he lost all sense of his surroundings. Opening his eyes after the blessing, he looked around to find an empty room, with the chicken escaped. "Where is the chicken" he began asking!
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 337: Käännetty englannista --- Andrei A.Orlov on amerikkalainen juutalaisuuden ja kristinuskon professori antiikin aikana Marquetten yliopistossa. Hän "on erikoistunut juutalaisen apokalyptismin ja mystiikan, toisen temppelin juutalaisuuden ja Vanhan testamentin Pseudepigraphan asiantuntijoihin." Wikipedia (englanti). Gershom Scholem oli saksalaissyntyinen israelilainen historioitsija ja modernin tieteellisen kabbalan tutkimuksen perustaja. Hänen teoksiinsa kuuluvat vaikutusvaltainen luentokokoelma Die jüdische Mystik in ihren Hauptströmungen sekä sabbatealaisten mystisen messiaan Šabbetai Tsevin elämäkerta.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 339: Gershom Scholem (1897 – 21. helmikuuta 1982[1]) oli saksalaissyntyinen israelilainen historioitsija ja modernin "tieteellisen" kabbalan tutkimuksen perustaja. Hänen teoksiinsa kuuluvat vaikutusvaltainen luentokokoelma Die jüdische Mystik in ihren Hauptströmungen (1941) sekä sabbatealaisten mystisen messiaan Šabbetai Tsevin elämäkerta (1973). Scholemin näkemykset ovat hallinneet kabbalan tutkimusta ainakin Moshe Ideliin asti. (Kukahan sekin oli.)
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 343: Scholem’s first marriage to Escha Burchhardt was on the rocks by the early 1930s. Not only was he imagining himself in love with Kitty Steinschneider (there is no evidence that she reciprocated), but he was also pursuing a relationship with his student, Fania Freud (they married in 1936). His diaries betray a sense of emotional chaos, as he wrote to his friend, Walter Benjamin, explaining to Benjamin why he could not host him in Jerusalem. He also wrote to Benjamin that he was struggling with questions of good and evil and whether an evil person could also be just. While he doesn’t say whether these questions were purely theoretical or not, it is striking that such ruminations came at exactly the time when his personal life was in turmoil.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 345: In treating Jacob Frank, the most nihilistic of these late Sabbatians, Scholem strikes a curious note. He starts his essay by criticizing all others who had written on Sabbatianism for their lack of objectivity, often expressed in pejorative language. Yet, when he arrives at Jacob Frank, he suddenly sheds his objective tone and launches into an invective-filled description of Frank as a tyrannical and corrupt imposter. How to understand this jarring shift?
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 347: Could there possibly be a connection between Scholem’s own confession of moral confusion and his treatment of Frank. Did he see something of himself in Frank, who was accused of various sexual perversions, and recoil in horror? While there can be no definitive answer to this question, considering Scholem’s emotional life from the years in which he was writing this pathbreaking essay creates the possibility of a new reading.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 349: The image of Scholem as a towering intellectual whose reach extended beyond the field of Jewish Studies often seems to exclude his personal and emotive life. Yet Gershom Scholem was anything but an ivory tower thinker cloistered in his study. The very power of his ideas owes much to the passion with which he infused them and that passion was the product of his emotions as well as his thought.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 450: In a world of fear and brokenness, Rabbi Nachman brought healing through his stories and his wisdom. He has become an iconic figure in the universe of Hasidic thinking, and today, thousands of people make pilgrimages to his grave in Uman in central Ukraine, usually around the High Holidays. People go there believing that the journey will “fix” their brokenness.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 453: Nachman was the great-grandson of Baal Shem Tov, the founder of the Hasidic movement. In 1802, at the age of 30, Nachman instituted his own Hasidic sect based in the Ukrainian town of Breslau. Nachman taught his followers to live in faith, simplicity and joy. 1in 1810, at the age of 38, Nachman died of tuberculosis. Sein Leben war kurz und beschiessen wie ein Hühnerbrett. Ditto with Spinoza.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 475: Martin Buberin dialogifilosofian historiallisia yhteyksiä voidaan nähdä luonnollisesti jo Sokrateessa, mutta varsinaisesti suurimpia vaikutteita filosofiseen ajatteluunsa Buber sai 1800-luvun filosofeilta, kuten Nietzscheltä, Kierkegaardilta, Feuerbachilta ja Jacobilta. Myös Kant on monin osin vaikuttava taustahahmo. 1700-luvun itäeurooppalaisella juutalaisliikkeellä hasidismilla on ollut Buberin ajatteluun vähintään yhtä suuri vaikutus kuin varsinaisilla filosofeilla. Selvää edeltäjää Buberin ajattelulla ei kuitenkaan ole. Samanaikaisesti Buberin kanssa tosin syntyi monella tavalla toisiaan muistuttavia dialogifilosofioita, mutta ilmeisen riippumattomina toisistaan
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 498: Teoksia Muokkaa: Byyrallor : humoristiska historier på österbottniskt bygdemål. Söderström, Borgå 1889
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 507: Hermann Karl Hesse (1877-1962), a Nobel Prize-winning German novelist and poet, is best known for his inspired explorations of self-understanding, spiritual realization, and psychology, particularly in Der Steppenwolf (1927), perhaps his best-known work.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 508: Hesse’s personal experience with psychoanalysis began when he sought therapy and refuge in a sanatorium after his father’s death in 1916, his first wife’s schizophrenia, and a serious illness of his son, Martin (not Mordechai). This began a long obsession with psychoanalysis, the influence of which appears in Demian (1919) and in his later work, which evidences his interest in Jungian concepts of introversion and extraversion, the collective unconscious, idealism, and the duality of human nature.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 512: Once and for all, it must be made public that Hesse is a classic example of how the Jew can poison the soul of the German people. For if at that time, when he took no delight in the war…he had not fallen into the clutches of the Jew Freud and his psychoanalysis, he would have remained the German writer we all loved so well. The warping of his soul can only be ascribed to this Jewish influence.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 514: Interestingly, several of Hesse’s drawings and etchings were discovered at the National Library in Israel half a century after his death. I bet he had asked Buber to come up to have a look at them. Like all narcissists, those born to be wild never wanna die, even if they explode into space.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 577: Das Wesen der Religiosität betreffend betont Buber die „Fortschrittlichkeit“ Jungs z. B. gegenüber Freud. Dennoch formuliert er in „Schuld und Schuldgefühle“ prägnant und präzise seine Kritik an Jung bezüglich dieses Themas: „Von ganz anderer Art ist die Lehre Jungs, den man als einen Mystiker des modernen, psychologischen Solipsismus bezeichnen kann. Die mystischen und mystisch-religiösen Konzeptionen, die Freud verachtet, sind für Jung der wichtigste Gegenstand seines Studiums; aber sie sind es leider nur als 'Projektionen' der Psyche, nicht als Hinweise auf etwas Außerpsychisches, dem sie begegnet“ (a. a. O.: 130). Einige Passagen weiter spricht Buber von „Freuds Materialismus“ und „Jungs Panpsychismus“.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 581: Zum psychologischen Welt- und Menschenbild äußerte sich Buber in dem oft erwähnten, im Psychologischen Klub in Zürich 1923 gehaltenen Vortrag „Von der Verseelung der Welt“, welcher zeitlich einerseits mit dem Beginn seiner intensiven Auseinandersetzung mit der zeitgenössischen Psychotherapie, andererseits mit der Formulierung seines eigenen dialogischen Prinzips korrespondiert. Wie der Titel des Vortrags suggeriert, wird laut Buber in der Psychotherapie – im Rahmen des sogenannten „Psychologismus“ – der Welt und ihrem Netz von Beziehungen die „Seele“ quasi weggenommen und nur im Menschen selbst, in seiner „Psyche“ angesiedelt, wobei die Psychoanalyse sich nur mit den intrapsychischen Vorgängen inklusive der in ihnen gespiegelten Welt beschäftige. Buber ärgerte sich über drei wichtigen psychoanalytisch-tiefenpsychologischen Themen: das Wesen der Schuld, das Wesen der Religiosität und das Wesen des Unbewussten.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 587: Carl Ransom Rogers (January 8, 1902 – February 4, 1987) was an American psychologist and among the founders of the humanistic approach (and client-centered approach) in psychology. The person-centered approach, his own unique approach to understanding personality and human relationships, found wide application in various domains such as psychotherapy and counseling (client-centered therapy), education (student-centered learning), organizations (self-centered leadership), and other group settings. Rogers was found to be the sixth most eminent psychologist of the 20th century and second in net worth, among clinicians, only to Sigmund Freud.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 591: Some scholars believe there is a politics implicit in Rogers's approach to psychotherapy. Toward the end of his life, Rogers came to that view himself. The central tenet of a Rogerian, person-centered politics is that public life does not have to consist of an endless series of winner-take-all battles among sworn opponents; rather, it can and should consist of an ongoing win-win conspiracy among all the cheats. (For details, watch Legally Blonde, Part II.)
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 593: Mit der Frage des Arztes „Wo fehlt es dir“ „ist die Sachlichkeit und das Urphänomen des Arztseins in die Wirklichkeit eingeführt. Dieses Alltägliche verdient mit Ernst, ja mit Feierlichkeit betrachtet zu werden.“ Und: „Dieser Anfang ist eine biographische Szene und ist zuerst ein Gespräch, dann ein Monolog." Zur erwähnten Urszene sagte Tellenbach: Und in diesem Augenblick taucht der Schatten Martin Bubers auf; denn hier in dieser anthropologischen Erhellung und Verdeutlichung des Gespräches Arzt-Patient ist Bubers dialogisches Prinzip in seiner methodologischen Tragweite in die Medizin eingeführt.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 598: In einem weiteren Brief vom 17. November 1936 gesteht Herr Dr. Binschwanger nach der Lektüre von Bubers „Die Frage an den Einzelnen“ seine philosophische Nähe zu Buber: „Ich vermag nicht nur überall mit Ihnen zu gehen, sondern sehe in Ihnen auch einen Bundesgenossen nicht nur gegen Kierkegaard, sondern auch gegen Heidegger, dem ich methodisch zwar aufs tiefste verpflichtet bin, dessen Daseinsauffassung (Dasein für den Führer) doch noch ganz auf der Linie Kierkegaards liegt“.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 601: Die Grundformen menschlichen Daseins sind nach Binschwanger die Liebe, die Existenz und der Geschlechtsverkehr, d.h. der enge Umgang mit den anderen oder mit sich selbst. Binschwangers philosophische Innovation über Buber war die einführung des Pronomens "wir". Das Miteinandersein von Mir und Dir“ wird hier differenziert. Dementsprechend heißen auch die zwei Subkapitel: „Das liebende 'Uber-und-Untereinandersein“ und „Das freundschaftliche Miteinandersein“. Der berühmte Satz Bubers aus „Ich und Du“: „Der Mensch wird am Du zum Ich, es, und Übermensch“ (Buber 2002: 32) findet seine etwaige Entsprechung im Binswanger’schen „Erst aus der Wirheit entspringt die Selbstheit“.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 605: Die philosophische Anthropologie entstand trotz starkem Widerstand und tiefer geschichtlicher Verwurzelung als eigenständige Richtung der Philosophie im ersten Drittel des 20. Jahrhunderts und führte stärker als in der bisherigen philosophischen Tradition die Diskussion um den ganzen Menschen sowie seine Position und seinen Sinn in der Welt. In der Nachfolge von Max Scheler (1874–1928) und Helmuth Plessner (1892–1985) könnten hier „drei Linien in der Konkretisierung unterschieden werden“: die von Karl Jaspers (1883–1969), geprägt von Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) („Existenzphilosophie“), die Schule von Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) als Nachfolge von u. a. Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) („Phänomenologie“) und „die Strömung des französischen Existentialismus, vorrangig geprägt durch Jean-Paul Sartre (1905–1980)“ (Beck 1991: 17). Allesamt ekliche solipsistisch-narzissistische Formen von Idealismus. Eine andere wesentliche Eigenschaft der neueren philosophischen Anthropologie war die epochale Entdeckung des anderen als Person und die Überwindung des ausschließlichen Subjekt-Objekt-Bezuges mit genau ebenso solipsistischem Ich-Du-Denken. Und der Sinn nun wieder. Warum können die idealistischen Philosophen sich nicht damit vergnügen dass es keinen Sinn für sie gibt, dass sie total sinnlos sind? Was ist nun so schwer damit? Ich weiss, weil sie narzissistich sind.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 620: These "Ultra-Orthodox" Jews became known as Haredi Jews, although both of these terms are considered negative in some circles. The term is also sometimes spelled Charedi or Chareidi in English. It is important to note that members of this group do not reject the modern world or technologies (like nuclear weapons) entirely, but they treat adaptations of Jewish law to fit that world as very serious. Most of the differences between Haredi and Orthodox perspectives have to do with decisions of oral law as to how the Torah should be applied to a modern situation. In many broad senses, the two groups tend to agree, and it is more in the specifics that things begin to diverge, like payot and tefilin and wearing antimacassars and funny double hats.
    xxx/ellauri157.html on line 624: This movement began in the 18th century by Rabbi Israel ben Eliezer, later known as Baal Shem Tov, the Master of the Good Name. Hasidic Judaism sets aside the earlier emphasis on studying the Torah from an academic perspective, and instead exalts the experience of it at all moments. Within the movement there are a number of sects, including the Satmar, Belz, Ger, Sanz, Puppa, Spinka, and Lubavitch. Mazel tov!
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 30: hismastersvoice.jpg" width="100%" />
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 35: This "expressionist" model claims she doesn't pay heed to her critics, especially those who "call me an attention seeker." According to her, the photos she puts out have an underlying message about "change" and not meant for popularity on social media. "If being popular was my goal, I don't think it would be such a wise decision to upset two-thirds of the world," she said.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 39: Belgian nude model Marisa Papen, who describes herself as a 'free-spirited and wildhearted exhibitionist', became the centre of a worldwide controversy 2017 when she was sent to prison for a photoshoot in the temple complex of Karnak near the Egyptian city of Luxor. 'In their eyes it was porn, or something like that.' 'The first cell we encountered was packed with at least 20 men, some were passed out on the floor, some were squeezing their hands through the rails, some were bleeding and yelling. 'Our judge was browsing with his big thumbs through these books looking as old as the pyramids. 'Eventually, he gave us a warning and told us never to do something so foolishly shameful ever again. We nodded simultaneously.' In the end, Papen and Walker managed to stay out of trouble by bribing them with £15.Thanks to her quick-witted reaction during her arrest, Papen is now able to proudly share her amazing arse in Walker´s magnificent pictures of the nude Egyptian photoshoot.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 51: Another remarkable difference, according to Papen, is how breastfeeding is seen by the Surma as something natural which can be done in the open, compared to the contradictions on social media and public places in the Western world. Personally I found that a shame to see, but I fear there is no way back when it comes to this.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 73: Louis-Sébastien Mercier (1740–1814) oli keskinkertainen ranskalainen kirjailija. Hän joutui Pariisin paheita kuvaavasta teoksestaan Tableau de Paris (1781–1789) maanpakoon, josta hän palasi vasta vallankumouksen alkaessa. Konventin edusmiehenä hän kannatti äänestyksessä Ludvig XVI:n elinkautista vankeutta ja joutui sen jälkeen itse vankeuteen. Vapautumisensa jälkeen hänet valittiin 500-miehiseen neuvostoon. Hän sai historian professorin viran, ja hänet valittiin Ranskan akatemian jäseneksi.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 80: Vuoden 2022 utopiassaan Mercier vastaa näihin kritiikkeihin. Hän uskoi lujasti ihmisen synnynnäiseen hyvyyteen ja hyväntahtoisuuteen ja siksi näki ihmisessä luontaisen taipumuksen hyveeseen. (Har, har.) Mercier’n mukaan onnellisuutta ei pysty saavuttamaan ilman kanssakäymistä, sosiaalisuutta. Juuri tämän sosiaalisuuden ja siitä seuraavan onnellisuuden Mercier esitti perusteluksi sille, miksi vuoden 2022 yhteiskunnassa sovellettaisiin rousseaulaista yhteiskuntasopimusta. Vaatimattomuus, huolenpito köyhistä ja tasa-arvo ovat Mercier’lle onnellisuuden premissejä yhteiskunnassa.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 92: Riikka Forsström on kulttuurihistorian tohtori, jolta on aiemmin ilmestynyt kaksi lastenkirjaa. Monelle hän saattaa olla tuttu naistenlehtiin kirjoittamistaan asiantuntija-artikkeleista.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 133: The gospel of Matthew is the only one to tell us Mary was pregnant before she and Joseph had sex. She was said to be “with child from the Holy Spirit”. In proof of this, Matthew quoted a prophecy from the Old Testament that a “virgin will conceive and bear a son and he will be called Emmanuel”.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 139: Within early Christian doctrine, Mary remained a virgin during and after the birth of Jesus. This was perhaps only fitting for someone deemed “the mother of God” or “God-bearer”.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 144: The Lateran Council of 649 CE, a council held in Rome by the Western Church, later declared it an article of faith that Jesus was conceived “without seed” and that Mary “incorruptibly bore [him], her virginity remaining indestructible even after his birth” . All this in spite of the Gospels’ declaration that Jesus had brothers and sisters (Mark 3.32, Matthew 12.46, Luke 8.19).
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 148: Within Western theology, it was generally recognised from the time of Saint Ambrose that Mary never committed a sin. But was her sinlessness in this life because she was born without “original sin”? After all, according to Western theology, every human being was born with original sin, the “genetic” consequence of the sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 160: The Eastern Orthodox Greek Church held to the dormition of Mary (uspenskij kafedral). According to this, Mary had a natural death, and her soul was then received by Christ. Her body arose on the third day after her death. She was then taken up bodily into heaven.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 167: Muslims, Christians and Jews do all worship the same complex God. Yet, in spite of this, all believe that their religion contains the full and final revelation of the same God. Here is the origin of their unity. Here also lies the cause of their division.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 169: For this belief in the truth of one religion and the falsity of the others leads to inevitable conflict between the believer and the unbeliever, the chosen and the rejected, the saved and the damned. Here lie the seeds of intolerance and violence. Three gods say they are the only one. At least two of them must be wrong. Maybe all.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 181: Väitöskirjansa Lutherin Mariakäsityksistä tehnyt Anja Ghiselli sanoo, että Luther seurasi Marian kohdalla katolisen kirkon oppia.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 188: – Lutherin mukaan juutalaisten sukukäsitys oli laajempi ja Jeesuksen veljistä puhuttaessa voidaan puhua Jeesuksen serkuista. Toinen tulkinta on, että Jeesuksen veljet ovat Joosefin lapsia edellisestä avioliitosta, sanoo Ghiselli. Seliseliä!
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 190: Oppi Marian ikuisesta neitsyydestä on saanut vaihtelevia tulkintoja kirkon historian aikana. Kirkkoisät Ignatius Atiokialainen ja Justinus opettivat, että Marialle syntyi muitakin lapsia. Käsitys Marian ikuisesta neitsyydestä vakiintui kirkon opetukseen 500-luvulla ja vahvistettiin vuonna 649 lateraalisynodissa.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 194: – Marian synnittömyys oli tärkeä, koska se takaa Jeesuksen synnittömyyden ja se on kaksiluonto-opin perustana. Sen sijaan kaksiluonto-opin kannalta myöhempi neitsyys ei ole tärkeää, sanoo Ghiselli. No mixi sitten Luther piti kiinni siitä? Ehkä se oli Joosefille vähän mustasukkainen.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 217: Versions of the ballad have been recorded by a number of artists, including The Corries, Angelo Branduardi, and this one by Joan Baez:
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 238: This night we'll go and see

    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 253: This death I would not dee

    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 262: And the only reward I find for this

    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 290: Mary Stuart could not be a real life source for the ballad in any of its current forms as these are in conflict with the historical record. She and the Four Maries lived in France from 1547 to 1560, where Mary was dauphine and then queen as the wife of King Francis II. Mary later returned home to Scotland (keeping the French spelling of her surname, Stuart). She married her second husband, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley in July 1565, and he was murdered 20 months later. So there was not much time for Darnley to have got one of the four Maries (or any other mistress) pregnant, and there is no record of him having done so. Also the song refers to "the highest Stuart of all" – which between 1542 and 1567 was a woman not a man.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 294: In many versions of the song, the queen is called "the auld Queen". This would normally indicate a Queen Dowager or Queen Mother, but in this context suggests a queen consort who was an older woman, and married to a king of comparable age. If the reference is limited to Queens named Mary, another candidate would be Mary of Guelders (1434–1463), queen to James II, King of Scots.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 299:

    This Hamilton was definitely not a saint nor a virgin.


    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 310: At 15, Emma met Sir Harry Fetherstonhaugh, who hired her for several months as hostess and entertainer at a lengthy stag party at Fetherstonhaugh's Uppark country estate in the South Downs. She is said to have danced nude on his dining room table. Fetherstonhaugh took Emma there as a mistress, but frequently ignored her in favour of drinking and hunting with his friends. Emma soon befriended the dull but sincere Honourable Charles Francis Greville (1749–1809). It was about this time (late June-early July 1781) that she conceived a child by Fetherstonhaugh.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 312: Greville took her in as his mistress, on condition that the child was fostered out. Once the child (Emma Carew) was born, she was removed to be raised by her great-grandmother at Hawarden for her first three years, and subsequently (after a short spell in London with her mother) deposited with Mr John Blackburn, schoolmaster, and his wife in Manchester. As a young woman, Emma's daughter saw her mother frequently, but later when Emma fell into debt, her daughter worked abroad as a companion or governess.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 314: Greville kept Emma in a small house at Edgware Row, Paddington Green, at this time a village on the rural outskirts of London. At Greville's request, she changed her name to "Mrs Emma Hart", dressed in modest outfits in subdued colours and eschewed a social life. He arranged for Emma's mother to live with her as housekeeper and chaperone. Greville also taught Emma to enunciate more elegantly, and after a while, started to invite some of his friends to meet her.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 316: Seeing an opportunity to make some money by taking a cut of sales, Greville sent her to sit for his friend, the painter George Romney, who was looking for a new model and muse. It was then that Emma became the subject of many of Romney's most famous portraits, and soon became London's biggest celebrity. So began Romney's lifelong obsession with her, sketching her nude and clothed in many poses that he later used to create paintings in her absence. Through the popularity of Romney's work and particularly of his striking-looking young model, Emma became well known in society circles, under the name of "Emma Hart". She was witty, intelligent, a quick learner, elegant and, as paintings of her attest, extremely beautiful. Romney was fascinated by her looks and ability to adapt to the ideals of the age. Romney and other artists painted her in many guises, foreshadowing her later "attitudes".
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 318: In 1783, Greville needed to find a rich wife to replenish his finances, and found a fit in the form of eighteen-year-old heiress Henrietta Middleton. Emma would be a problem, as he disliked being known as her lover (this having become apparent to all through her fame in Romney's artworks), and his prospective wife would not accept him as a suitor if he lived openly with Emma Hart.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 320: To be rid of Emma, Greville persuaded his uncle, younger brother of his mother, Sir William Hamilton, British Envoy to Naples, to take her off his hands. Greville's marriage would be useful to Sir William, as it relieved him of having Greville as a poor relation. To promote his plan, Greville suggested to Sir William that Emma would make a very pleasing mistress, assuring him that, once married to Henrietta Middleton, he would come and fetch Emma back. Sir William, then 55 and newly widowed, had arrived back in London for the first time in over five years. Emma's famous beauty was by then well known to Sir William, so much so that he even agreed to pay the expenses for her journey to ensure her speedy arrival. A great collector of antiquities and beautiful objects, he took interest in her as another acquisition. He had long been happily married until the death of his wife in 1782, and he liked female companionship. His home in Naples was well known all over the world for hospitality and refinement. He needed a hostess for his salon, and from what he knew about Emma, he thought she would be the perfect choice.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 322: Greville did not inform Emma of his plan, but instead in 1785 suggested the trip as a prolonged holiday in Naples while he (Greville) was away in Scotland on business, not long after Emma's mother had suffered a stroke. Emma was thus sent to Naples, supposedly for six to eight months, little realising that she was going as the mistress of her host. Emma set off for Naples with her mother and Gavin Hamilton on 13 March 1786 overland in an old coach, and arrived in Naples on her 21st birthday on 26 April.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 324: After about six months of living in apartments in the Palazzo Sessa with her mother (separately from Sir William) and begging Greville to come and fetch her, Emma came to understand that he had cast her off. She was furious when she realised what Greville had planned for her, but eventually started to enjoy life in Naples and responded to Sir William's intense courtship just before Christmas in 1786. They fell in love, Sir William forgot about his plan to take her on as a temporary mistress, and Emma moved into his apartments, leaving her mother downstairs in the ground floor rooms. Emma was unable to attend Court yet, but Sir William took her to every other party, assembly and outing.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 326: They were married on 6 September 1791 at St Marylebone Parish Church, then a plain small building, having returned to England for the purpose and Sir William having gained the King's consent. She was twenty-six and he was sixty. Although she was obliged to use her legal name of Amy Lyon on the marriage register, the wedding gave her the title Lady Hamilton which she would use for the rest of her life. Hamilton's public career was now at its height and during their visit he was inducted into the Privy Council. Shortly after the ceremony, Romney painted his last portrait of Emma from life, The Ambassadress, after which he plunged into a deep depression and drew a series of frenzied sketches of Emma.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 332: After four years of marriage, Emma had despaired of having children with Sir William, although she wrote of him as "the best husband and friend". It seems likely that he was sterile. She once again tried to persuade him to allow her daughter to come and live with them in the Palazzo Sessa as her mother Mrs Cadogan's niece, but he refused this as well as her request to make enquiries in England about suitors for the young Emma.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 334: Nelson returned to Naples five years later, on 22 September 1798. a living legend, after his victory at the Battle of the Nile in Aboukir, with his step-son Josiah Nisbet, then 18 years old. By this time, Nelson's adventures had prematurely aged him; he had lost an arm and most of his teeth, and was afflicted by coughing spells. Before his arrival, Emma had written a letter passionately expressing her admiration for him. Nelson even wrote effusively of Emma to his increasingly estranged wife. Emma and Sir William escorted Nelson to their home, the Palazzo Sessa.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 336: Emma nursed Nelson under her husband's roof and arranged a party with 1,800 guests to celebrate his 40th birthday on 29 September. After the party, Emma became Nelson's secretary, translator and political facilitator. They soon fell in love and began an affair. Hamilton showed admiration and respect for Nelson, and vice versa; the affair was tolerated. By November, gossip from Naples about their affair reached the English newspapers. Emma Hamilton and Horatio Nelson were famous.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 338: Upon arrival in London on 8 November, the three of them took suites at Nerot's Hotel after a missed communication from Nelson to his wife about receiving the party at their home, Roundwood. Lady Nelson and Nelson's father arrived and they all dined at the hotel, with Fanny deeply unhappy to see Emma pregnant. The affair soon became public knowledge, and to the delight of the newspapers, Fanny did not accept the affair as placidly as Sir William. Emma was winning the media war at that point, and every fine lady was experimenting with her look. Nelson contributed to Fanny's misery by being cruel to her when not in Emma's company. Sir William was mercilessly lampooned in the press, but his sister observed that he doted on Emma and she was very attached to him.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 340: The Hamiltons moved into William Beckford's mansion at 22 Grosvenor Square, and Nelson and Fanny took an expensive furnished house at 17 Dover Street, a comfortable walking distance away, until December, when Sir William rented a home at 23 Piccadilly, opposite Green Park. On 1 January, Nelson's promotion to vice admiral was confirmed and he prepared to go to sea on the same night. Infuriated by Fanny's handing him an ultimatum to choose between her and his mistress, Nelson chose Emma and decided to take steps to formalise separation from his wife. He never saw her again, after being hustled out of town by an agent. While he was at sea, Nelson and Emma exchanged many letters, using a secret code to discuss Emma's condition. Emma kept her first daughter Emma Carew's existence a secret from Nelson, while Sir William continued to provide for her.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 344: Soon after this, the Prince of Wales (later King George IV) became infatuated with Emma, leading Nelson to be consumed by jealousy, and inspiring a remarkable letter by Sir William to Nelson, assuring him that she was being faithful. In late February, Nelson returned to London and met his daughter at Mrs Gibson's. Nelson's family were aware of the pregnancy, and his clergyman brother Rev. William Nelson wrote to Emma praising her virtue and goodness. Nelson and Emma continued to write letters to each other when he was away at sea, and she kept every one. While he was away too, she arranged for her mother to visit the Kidds in Hawarden and her daughter in Manchester.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 346: By the autumn of the same year, upon Emma's advice, Nelson bought Merton Place, a small ramshackle house at Merton, near Wimbledon, for £9,000, borrowing money from his friend Davison. He gave her free rein with spending to improve the property, and her vision was to transform the house into a celebration of his genius. There they lived together openly, with Sir William and Emma's mother, in a ménage à trois that fascinated the public. Emma turned herself to winning over Nelson's family, nursing his 80-year-old father Edmund for 10 days at Merton, who loved her and thought of moving in with them, but could not bear to leave his beloved Norfolk. Emma also made herself useful to Nelson's sisters Kitty (Catherine), married to George Matcham, and Susanna, married to Thomas Bolton, by helping to raise their children and to make ends meet. Nelson's sister-in-law Sarah (married to William), also pressed him for assistance and favours, including the payment of their son Horatio's school fees at Eton. Also around this time, Emma finally told Nelson about her daughter Emma Carew, now known as Emma Hartley, and found that she had had nothing to worry about; he invited her to stay at Merton and soon grew fond of "Emma's relative". An unpublished letter shows that Nelson assumed responsibility for upkeep of young Emma at this time.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 348: After the Treaty of Amiens on 25 March 1802, Nelson was released from active service, but wanted to keep his new-found position in society by maintaining an aura of wealth, and Emma worked hard to live up to this dream. Nelson's father became seriously ill in April, but Nelson did not visit him in Norfolk, staying home to celebrate Emma's 37th birthday on the very day Edmund died; the son did not attend his father's funeral.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 354: Nelson had been offered the position of Commander-in-Chief of the Mediterranean Fleet, and they rushed to have Horatia christened at Marylebone Parish Church before he left. On her baptism record, her name was recorded as Horatia Nelson Thompson, and her date of birth falsely recorded as 29 October 1800 in order to continue the pretence that she had been born in Naples and was godchild of Emma and Nelson, according to Kate Williams and based on an unpublished letter; however the only publicly available transcription of the record shows 29 October 1801. Nelson later wrote a letter explaining that the child was an orphan "left to his care and protection" in Naples.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 356: Emma planned, paid for and hosted the wedding of Nelson's niece Kitty Bolton (daughter of Susanna) and her cousin Captain Sir William Bolton (Nelson's sister Susanna's husband's brother's son) at 23 Piccadilly on 18 May 1803, the same day as Nelson's early morning departure to fight in the Napoleonic Wars, leaving Emma pregnant with their second child (although neither knew it at this time). The marriage was witnessed by Charlotte Mary Nelson (Nelson's brother William's daughter) and "Emma Hartley" (Emma's daughter Emma Carew).
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 358: She was desperately lonely, preoccupied with attempting to turn Merton Place into the grand home Nelson desired, suffering from several ailments and frantic for his return. The child, a girl (reportedly named Emma), died about 6 weeks after her birth in early 1804, and Horatia also fell ill at her home with Mrs Gibson on Titchfield Street. Emma kept the infant's death a secret from the press (her burial is unrecorded), kept her deep grief from Nelson's family and found it increasingly difficult to cope alone. She reportedly distracted herself by gambling, and succumbed to binges of heavy drinking and eating and spending lavishly.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 360: Emma received several marriage proposals during 1804, all wealthy men, but she was still in love with Nelson and believed that he would become wealthy with prize money and leave her rich in his will, and she refused them all. She continued to entertain and help Nelson's relatives, especially William and Sarah's "obstreperous son Horace" and their daughter Charlotte, who was referred to as Emma's "foster daughter" in a letter. Nelson urged her to keep Horatia at Merton, and when his return seemed imminent in 1804, Emma ran up bills on furnishing and decorating Merton. Five-year-old Horatia came to live at Merton in May 1805. There were also reports that she holidayed with Emma Carew.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 362: After a brief visit to England in August 1805, Nelson once again had to return to service. Emma received letters from him on 1, 7 and 13 October. On the ship, he wrote a note intended as a codicil to his will requesting that, in return for his legacy to King and Country that they should give Emma "ample provision to maintain her rank in life", and that his "adopted daughter, Horatia Nelson Thompson...use in future the name of Nelson only".
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 364: On 21 October 1805, Nelson's fleet defeated a joint Franco-Spanish naval force at the Battle of Trafalgar. Nelson was seriously wounded during the battle and died three hours later. When the news of his death arrived in London, a messenger was sent to Merton Place to bring the news to Lady Hamilton. She later recalled,
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 366: They brought me word, Mr Whitby from the Admiralty. 'Show him in directly,' I said. He came in, and with a pale countenance and faint voice, said, 'We have gained a great Victory.' – 'Never mind your Victory,' I said. 'My letters – give me my letters' – Captain Whitby was unable to speak – tears in his eyes and a deathly paleness over his face made me comprehend him. I believe I gave a scream and fell back, and for ten hours I could neither speak nor shed a tear.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 368: Emma lay in bed prostrate with grief for many weeks, often receiving visitors in tears. It was some weeks before she heard that Nelson's last words were of her and that he had begged the nation to take care of her and Horatia. After William and Sarah distanced themselves from her (William being elated upon hearing that Nelson had not changed his will), she relied on Nelson's sisters (Kitty Matcham and Susanna Bolton) for moral support and company. Like her, the Boltons and Matchams had spent lavishly in expectation of Nelson's victorious return, and Emma gave them and other of his friends and relations money.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 370: Nelson's will was read in November; William inherited his entire estate (including Bronte) except for Merton, as well as his bank accounts and possessions. The government had made William an Earl and his son Horatio (aka Horace) a Viscount - the titles Nelson had aspired to - and now he was also Duke of Bronte. Emma received £2000, Merton, and £500 per annum from the Bronte estate - much less than she had when Nelson was alive, and not enough to maintain Merton. In spite of Nelson's status as a national hero, the instructions he left to the government to provide for Emma and Horatia were ignored; they also ignored his wishes that she should sing at his funeral.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 378: She moved from Clarges Street to a cheaper home at 136 Bond Street, but could not bring herself to relinquish Merton. Her brother, William, blackmailed her into giving him money, and Mrs Cadogan's sister's family, the Connors, were also expecting handouts. Emma Carew came for a short summer visit in late June 1806, at which point Sir Harry Fetherstonhaugh sent £500 for the benefit of mother and daughter. Emma hosted and employed James Harrison for 6 months to write a two-volume Life of Nelson, which made it clear that Horatia was his child. She continued to entertain at Merton, including the Prince of Wales and the Dukes of Sussex and Clarence, but no favours were returned by the royals.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 380: Within three years, Emma was more than £15,000 in debt. In June 1808, Merton failed to sell at auction. She was not completely without friends; her neighbours had rallied, and Sir John Perring hosted a group of influential financiers to help organise her finances and sell Merton. It was eventually sold in April 1809. However, her lavish spending continued, and a combination of this and the steady depletion of funds due to people fleecing her meant that she remained in debt, although unbeknownst to most people. Her mother, Mrs Cadogan, died in January 1810. For most of 1811 and 1812 she was in a virtual debtors' prison, and in December 1812 either chose to commit herself (her name does not appear in the record books) or was sentenced to a prison sentence at the King's Bench Prison in Southwark, although she was not kept in a cell but allowed to live in rooms nearby with Horatia, as per the system whereby genteel prisoners could buy the rights to live "within the Rules", a three-square-mile area around the prison.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 411: Emma Hamilton on australialainen näyttelijä. Televisiossa hän esiintyi sarjapäällikkönä Nine Network -draamitrillerissä Hyde & Seek sekä säännöllisinä rooleina Anne Stanhopeina Showtime -historiallisessa draamassa The Tudors, Rosie Dolly ITV/PBS -aikakauden draamassa Mr Selfridge ja ITV: ssä. Rikos -trilleri Fearless. Wikipedia (englanti)
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 415: Who's Winston Churchill? Did he ever make a movie? No? Then what's the big deal? Well reportedly he finagled to have this one made, Brit propaganda from inception to final credits, all about Brit superstar and icon Lord Nelson and his dangerous liasion with a married lady from the wrong side of the tracks. Delivered with finesse and verve by Olivier and Leigh, in the flush of their fame and talent, there is a sort of magical spell evoked, and the recreation of Nelson's passing (high on Brit radar, nil on American) (oh! spoiler alert!, dammit!) might tug a tear or two.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 417: Of course, saying your empire is morally superior to the other fellow's is a sad exercise at best but then this movie was made during World War II so some allowances should be made,
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 419: That Hamilton Woman" is an opulent movie that takes a decidedly sideways glance at history, almost turning an important point in history into an overheated soap opera.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 473: ‘I used to be a foot fetishist. I had such beautiful shoes. But my feet changed shape and now I can only wear them for limited periods,’ he says.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 489: Azrael (/ˈæzriəl/; Hebrew: עֲזַרְאֵל, romanized: ʿÁzarʾēl; Arabic: عزرائيل, romanized: ʿAzrāʾēl or ʿEzrāʾēl) is the angel of death in some Abrahamic religions, namely Islam and some traditions of Judaism. He is also referenced in Sikhism. In the Smurfs, the cat of the evil wizard Gargamel is called Azrael. In Hebrew, Azrael translates to "Angel of God" or "Help from God".
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 498: Into this wild Abyss
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 505: Into this wild Abyss the wary Fiend
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 507: Pondering his voyage; for no narrow frith
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 551: The American Library Association´s 2008 banned book list identified His Masters Voice as the second most requested book to be banned across the country. Pullman himself only egged on the controversy, as he publicly stated that he aimed to undermine Christian beliefs with his books.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 579: There’s a tonne of therapy and sexual issues wrapped up here isn’t it? Who in their right mind would want a perpetually healing hymen? Or was this just a one time deal - just when conceiving via holy spirit? I should add why was her virginity so important anyway? Seems a throw back to a time which virginity may have been prized. I’d image venereal diseases were considered a curse for those fornicating, a moral judgement. But it still seems over blown.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 588: With mention of the donkey, I have to add this. In a recent online discussion on the historicity of the Bible, one person commented “we can be assured of one thing, Balaam’s Donkey definitely did exist and did speak. The only thing we have to further ascertain is… did he sound like Eddie Murphy?”
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 601: With a Bible in his hands

    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 604: Then he closed his eyes

    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 606: Broke his bread

    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 607: Then shared it with his children.

    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 625: With a Bible in his hand.

    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 636: In the eschatological discourse of Matthew 25:31-46, Jesus says that, when the Son of Man comes in his glory, he will separate people from one another as a shepherd separates sheep from goats, and will consign to everlasting fire those who failed to aid "the least of his brothers". This separation is stark, with no explicit provision made for fine gradations of merit or guilt:
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 638: Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me. ...whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 641: Opinions about the permanency of hell have shifted considerably, both in the early church and in recent times. The doctrine of universal salvation (also known as Apokatastasis or Apocatastasis ) has usually been considered through the centuries to be heterodox but has become orthodox. It was maintained by the Second Vatican Council and by Pope John Paul II and it is promoted in the new Catechism of the Catholic Church and in the post-Vatican II liturgy. Francis maintains the same teaching.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 656: One historic Protestant view of hell is expressed in the Westminster Confession (1646):
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 658: "but the wicked, who know not God, and obey not the gospel of Jesus Christ, shall be cast into eternal torments, and punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power." (Chapter XXXIII, Of the Last Judgment)
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 660: According to the Alliance Commission on Unity & Truth among Evangelicals (ACUTE) the majority of Protestants have held that hell will be a place of perpetual conscious torment, both physical and spiritual. This is known as the eternal conscious torment (ECT) view. Some recent writers such as Anglican layman C. S. Lewis[86] and J.P. Moreland have cast people to hell in terms of "eternal separation" from God. Certain biblical texts have led some theologians[who?] to the conclusion that punishment in hell, though eternal and irrevocable, will be proportional to the deeds of each soul (e.g., Matthew 10:15, Luke 12:46-48).
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 668: Annihilationism is directly related to the doctrine of Christian conditionalism, the idea that a human soul is not immortal unless it is given eternal life. The belief in annihilationism has appeared throughout Christian history and was defended by several Church Fathers, but it has often been in the minority. The Church of England´s Doctrine Commission reported in 1995 that Hell may be a state of "total non-being", not eternal torment.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 670: Milton in Paradise Lost refers to death as "sleep" and the dead as being "raised from sleep". The difference is difficult to identify in practice. Christian mortalism has been taught by several theologians and church organizations throughout history while also facing opposition from aspects of Christian organized religion. The Catholic Church condemned such thinking in the Fifth Council of the Lateran as "erroneous assertions". Supporters include the sixteenth-century religious figure Martin Luther and the eighteenth-century religious figure Henry Layton, among many others.
    xxx/ellauri165.html on line 672: This article was a part of an article series called Salvation in Christianity. Table of contents:
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 36: When Moses told him, Aaron held out the staff in his hand and struck the dust on the ground. It turned into gnats that bit people and animals. All the dust on the ground everywhere in Egypt turned into gnats.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 48: According to the Book of Exodus in the Bible, the staff (Hebrew: מַטֶּה matteh, translated "rod" in the King James Bible) was used to produce water from a rock, was transformed into a snake and back, and was used at the parting of the Red Sea. Whether or not Moses' staff was the same as that used by his brother Aaron (known as Aaron's rod) has been debated by rabbinical scholars.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 50: The staff is miraculously transformed into a snake and then back into a staff. The staff is thereafter referred to as the "rod of God" or "staff of God" (depending on the translation). And thou shalt take this rod in thine hand, wherewith thou shalt do signs".
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 54: Moses also uses the staff in the battle at Rephidim between the Israelites and the Amalekites (Exodus 17:8-16).[2] When he holds up his arms holding the "rod of God" the Israelites "prevail", when he drops his arms, their enemies gain the upper hand. Aaron and Hur help him to keep the staff raised until victory is achieved.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 63: The staff with which Jacob crossed the Jordan is identical with that which Judah gave to his daughter-in-law, Tamar (Gen. xxxii. 10, xxxviii. 18). It is likewise the holy rod with which Moses worked (Ex. iv. 20, 21), with which Aaron performed wonders before Pharaoh (Ex. vii. 10), and with which, finally, David slew the giant Goliath (I Sam. xvii. 40). David left it to his descendants, and the Davidic kings used it as a scepter until the destruction of the Temple, when it miraculously disappeared. When the Messiah comes it will be given to him for a scepter in token of his authority over the heathen. (And we don't mean INRI here.)
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 68: There is a mention of the rod of Moses in a deposition of Nicolas, abbot of the Icelandic Benedictine monastery of Thingeyrar, who had seen it guarded in a chapel of a palace in Constantinople in c. 1150. According to this source, the archbishop of Novgorod, Anthony, stated that it was in the church of St Michael in the Boukoleon Palace, among other precious relics. After the sack of Constantinople in 1204 it was transported to France where Bishop Nevelon placed it in Soissons cathedral and it then passed to the treasury of the Sainte-Chapelle.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 70: According to an unidentified identifying document [citation needed] at the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, Moses's staff would supposedly be on display today at the Topkapı Palace, Istanbul, Turkey. The Topkapi Palace holds other reputedly holy relics, most notably those attributed to the Islamic prophet, Muhammad. (Such as his bow, his sword, his footprint, and even a tooth.) Topkapı Palace was officially designated a museum in 1924, and the holy relics were placed on public view on 31 August 1962. It is said that Sultan Selim I (1512–1520) brought the holy relics to Topkapi Palace after conquering Egypt in 1517.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 74: Mythological objects encompass a variety of items (e.g. weapons, armor, clothing) found in mythology, legend, folklore, tall tale, fable, religion, spirituality, superstition, paranormal, and pseudoscience from across the world. This list will be organized according to the category of object.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 77: This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. (August 2008).
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 217: Laughter" and "derision" are, of course, anthropo-morphisms. It is meant that God views with contempt and scorn man's weak attempts at rebellion. (That is not anthropomorphic in the least.) Psalm 2:4
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 219: “This is spoken of God,” says Dr. Dodd, “after the manner of men, to denote his utter contempt of the opposition of his enemies; the perfect ease with which he was able to disappoint all their measures, and crush them for their impiety and folly; together with his absolute security, that his counsels should stand and his measures be finally accomplished; as men laugh at, and hold in utter contempt, those whose malice and power they know to be utterly vain and impotent. The introducing God as thus laughing at, and deriding his enemies, is in the true spirit of poetry, and with the utmost propriety and dignity.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 221: Shall laugh - Will smile at their vain attempts, maybe even sneer; will not be disturbed or agitated by their efforts; will go calmly on in the execution of his purposes. Compare as above Isaiah 18:4. See also Proverbs 1:26; Psalm 37:13; Psalm 59:8. This is, of course, to be regarded as spoken after the manner of men, and it means that God will go steadily forward in the accomplishment of his purposes. There is included also the idea that he will look with contempt on their vain and futile efforts.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 223: The Lord shall have them in derision - The same idea is expressed here in a varied form, as is the custom in parallelism in Hebrew poetry. The Hebrew word לעג lâ‛ag, means properly to stammer; then to speak in a barbarous or foreign tongue; then to mock or deride, by imitating the stammering voice of anyone. Gesenius, Lexicon Here it is spoken of God, and, of course, is not to be understood literally, anymore than when eyes, and hands, and feet are spoken of as pertaining to him. The meaning is, that there is a result in the case, in the Divine Mind, as if he mocked or derided the vain attempts of men; that is, he goes calmly forward in the execution of his own purposes, and he looks upon and regards their efforts as vain, as we do the efforts of others when we mock or deride them. The truth taught in this verse is, that God will carry forward his own plans in spite of all the attempts of men to thwart them. This general truth may lie stated in two forms:
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 225: Laughing is ascribed unto him, according to the language of men, as the Jewish writers speak (d), by an anthropopathy; in the same sense as he is said to repent and grieve, Genesis 6:6; and expresses his security from all their attempts, Job 5:22; and the contempt he has them in, and the certain punishment of them, and the aggravation of it; who will not only then laugh at them himself, but expose them to the laughter and scorn of others, Proverbs 1:26;
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 304: From that initial catastrophe, the highest sparks fell to the lowest places. In particular, Shechinah descended within this world to seek out our souls (also feminine), so that this world and this life of ours should play out as not just another zero-sum game, but as a win-win investment with incomparable returns.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 312: If you’ve ever set out to clean up a teenager’s room, you can probably relate to the following: Daunted by the task ahead of you, you cleverly start with the big stuff. Having dislodged some furniture, moving them into appropriate corners, tossed a few cardboard boxes into recycling, and discovering that, yes, there is a floor down there, only then can you really get started. But that’s also when it becomes apparent just how ugly this mess really is. Now is time for the scraping, grinding, elbow grease and harsh chemicals. The hardest tasks are always left for last.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 316: Shechinah is a Chaldee word meaning resting-place, not found in Scripture, but used by the later Jews to designate the visible trace of Cod's presence in the tabernacle, and afterwards in Solomon's temple. When the Lord led Israel out of Egypt, he went before them "in a pillar of a cloud." This was the symbol of his presence with his people. For references made to it during the wilderness wanderings, see Exodus 14:20 ; 40:34-38 ; Leviticus 9:23 Leviticus 9:24 ; Numbers 14:10 ; Numbers 16:19 Numbers 16:42 .
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 318: It is probable that after the entrance into Canaan this glory-cloud settled in the tabernacle upon the ark of the covenant in the most holy place. We have, however, no special reference to it till the consecration of the temple by Solomon, when it filled the whole house with its glory, so that the priests could not stand to minister ( 1 Kings 8:10-13 ; 2 Chr. 1 Kings 5:13 1 Kings 5:14 ; 7:1-3 ). Probably it remained in the first temple in the holy of holies as the symbol of Jehovah's presence so long as that temple stood. It afterwards disappeared. (See CLOUD .)
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 320: The shekhinah (Biblical Hebrew: שכינה šekīnah; also Romanized shekina(h), schechina(h), shechina(h)) is the English transliteration of a Hebrew word meaning "dwelling" or "settling" and denotes the dwelling or settling of the divine presence of Cod. This term does not occur in the Bible, and is from rabbinic literature.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 327: Mitä onko juutalaisillakin joku pyhä henki? Nähtävästi näin. Se esiintyy 3x Tanakhissa. Bylsittyään Bathshebaa Dave sävelsi Psalmin 51 jossa on tämmöiset verses 11 and 12:
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 338: Yahusha 216 times – The son, ha Mashiach (the Messiah), The anointed – this name in Hebrew means Yahu delivers.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 343: The Ruch Ah Qudsh is the spirit or character aspect of Yahuah, and therefore a part of Yahuah (Isaiah 40:13). The Ruach is pictured allegorically throughout the Tanakh as the feminine or motherly aspect of Yahuah, and is also synonymous with wisdom, as depicted in the Proverbs where wisdom says, "Yahuah possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was." (Proverbs 8:22,23) The phrase, "YHUH possessed me", indicates that wisdom is the Ruach, or the bride, especially since wisdom is portrayed as feminine.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 345: Yahusha is the only begotten Son, the word, body, substance of Yahuah which was brought forth, or revealed to mankind at the dawn of the Creation. Yahusha is also a part of Yahuah as evidenced by his own statement, "The Father and I are One", among many other scriptures.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 347: It is through the being of Yahuah (fatherly aspect) and the wisdom or spirit of Yahuah (motherly aspect) that the son of Yahuah, the bodily manifestation or substance of Yahuah was conceived, and eventually brought forth into the world by the means of a virgin named Miriam. Ha Mashiach was conceived of the Ruach (Matthew 1:20), and in the physical portrayal of this, he was born of Miriam. The meaning of the word "of" carries through in that HaMashiach is conceived and born of the Ruch, as sort of "pictured" in Miriam. The conception in the spiritual realm was also pictured at HaMashiach's baptism when the Ruch Ah Qudsh descended upon him in the form of a dove, and Yahuah spoke from heaven saying, "my son, the beloved, in you I am well pleased" Luke 3:22.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 349: The family of Yahuah, just as your family has the name of the father, so if you wish to be grafted into Yahuah's Family and use his name, you need to have a power of attorney giving you authority to use his name, this is given through his spirit, the Ruch Ah Qudsh, together with the son Yahusha HaMashiach (The Messiah), making you a chosen YAHU, having the father and son's name written upon you and also within the family "tree" book, the book of life!
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 361: Yahuah said, "Let us make Mankind in our image, after our likeness," and then "Yahuah created Mankind in his own image, in the image of Yahuah he created them, male and female he created them." Thus, the image of Yahuah was male and female - not simply one or the other.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 371: At that time Yahusha, full of joy through Ruch Ah Qudsh, said, "I praise you, Father, Alahym (Elohim) of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to his chosen children. Yes, father, for this was your good pleasure." Luke 10:21
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 377: Kabbalah associates the shekhinah with the female. According to Gershom Scholem, "The introduction of this idea was one of the most important and lasting innovations of Kabbalism. ...no other element of Kabbalism won such a degree of popular approval." The "feminine Jewish divine presence, the shekhinah, distinguishes Kabbalistic literature from earlier Jewish literature."
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 380: American poet Gustav Davidson listed shekhinah as an entry in his reference work A Dictionary of Angels, Including the Fallen Angels (1967), stating that she is the female incarnation of Metatron.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 385:

    Rashi and the tosaphists


    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 387: Hyvä nimi rock- yhtyeelle: a big hand for Rashi and the Tosaphists!
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 388: Singerin iskä kirjoitti koko ikänsä julkaisukelvottomia kirjoituksia joissa puolusti Rashia tosaphistien hyökkäyxiä vastaan. Se ajatteli jäävänsä sillä lailla eloon kuoltuaan. Huulet puhuisivat haudasta. Ei se tätä kertonut Iisakille kuin Puurimina kännissä. Siitä Itzhak sai päähänsä ruveta izekin kirjailijaxi.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 390: Shlomo Yitzchaki (Hebrew: רבי שלמה יצחקי‎; Latin: Salomon Isaacides; French: Salomon de Troyes, 22 February 1040 – 13 July 1105), today generally known by the acronym Rashi (see below), was a medieval French rabbi and author of a comprehensive commentary on the Talmud and commentary on the Hebrew Bible (the Tanakh). Acclaimed for his ability to present the basic meaning of the text in a concise and lucid fashion, Rashi appeals to both learned scholars and beginner students, and his works remain a centerpiece of contemporary Jewish study. His commentary on the Talmud, which covers nearly all of the Babylonian Talmud (a total of 30 out of 39 tractates, due to his death), has been included in every edition of the Talmud since its first printing by Daniel Bomberg in the 1520s. His commentary on Tanakh—especially on the Chumash ("Five Books of Moses")—serves as the basis for more than 300 "supercommentaries" which analyze Rashi's choice of language and citations, penned by some of the greatest names in rabbinic literature.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 392: Rashi's surname, Yitzhaki, derives from his father's name, Yitzhak. The acronym "Rashi" stands for Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaki.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 393: Rashi was an only child born at Troyes, Champagne, in northern France. His mother's brother was Simeon bar Isaac, rabbi of Mainz. Simon was a disciple of Gershom ben Judah, who died that same year. On his father's side, Rashi has been claimed to be a 33rd-generation descendant of Johanan HaSandlar,[citation needed] who was a fourth-generation descendant of Gamaliel, who was reputedly descended from the Davidic line. In his voluminous writings, Rashi himself made no such claim at all. The main early rabbinical source about his ancestry, Responsum No. 29 by Solomon Luria, makes no such claim either.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 395: Drawing on the breadth of Midrashic, Talmudic and Aggadic literature (including literature that is no longer extant), as well as his knowledge of Hebrew grammar and halakhah, Rashi clarifies the "simple" meaning of the text so that a bright child of five could understand it. At the same time, his commentary forms the foundation for some of the most profound legal analysis and mystical discourses that came after it. Scholars debate why Rashi chose a particular Midrash to illustrate a point, or why he used certain words and phrases and not others. Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi wrote that "Rashi's commentary on Torah is the 'wine of Torah'. It opens the heart and uncovers one's essential love and fear of Cod.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 397: Scholars believe that Rashi's commentary on the Torah grew out of the lectures he gave to his students in his yeshiva, and evolved with the questions and answers they raised on it. Rashi completed this commentary only in the last years of his life. It was immediately accepted as authoritative by all Jewish communities, Ashkenazi and Sephardi alike.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 399: . Rashi's commentary, drawing on his knowledge of the entire contents of the Talmud, attempts to provide a full explanation of the words and of the logical structure of each Talmudic passage. Unlike other commentators, Rashi does not paraphrase or exclude any part of the text, but elucidates phrase by phrase. Often he provides punctuation in the unpunctuated text, explaining, for example, "This is a question"; "He says this in surprise", "He repeats this in agreement", etc.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 401: Some say that his responsa allows people to obtain "clear pictures of his personality," and shows Rashi as a kind, gentle, humble, and liberal man.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 403: Another legend states that Rashi died while writing a commentary on Talmud, and that the very last word he wrote was 'tahor,' which means pure in Hebrew - indicating that his soul was pure as it left his body.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 417: In general, Rashi provides the peshat or literal meaning of Jewish texts, while his disciples known as the Tosafot ("additions"), gave more interpretative descriptions of the texts. The Tosafot's commentaries can be found in the Talmud opposite Rashi's commentary. The Tosafot added comments and criticism in places where Rashi had not added comments. The Tosafot went beyond the passage itself in terms of arguments, parallels, and distinctions that could be drawn out. This addition to Jewish texts was seen as causing a "major cultural product" which became an important part of Torah study.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 419: Up to and including Rashi, the Talmudic commentators occupied themselves only with the plain meaning ("peshaṭ") of the text; but after the beginning of the twelfth century the spirit of criticism took possession of the teachers of the Talmud. Thus some of Rashi's continuators, as his sons-in-law and his grandson Samuel ben Meïr (RaSHBaM), while they wrote commentaries on the Talmud after the manner of Rashi's, wrote also glosses on it in a style peculiar to themselves.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 423: The actual father of the tosafot in France was Jacob b. Meir, known colloquially as Rabbeinu Tam, whose style was adopted by his successors. Hei tää oli se Rashin lisäxi toinen heppu jonka ärhäkämpiä lauseita oli toisessa tefil-laatikossa.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 425: The first German tosafist, Isaac b. Asher ha-Levi, was a student of Rashi and the head of a school, and his pupils, besides composing tosafot of their own, revised his.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 492: Manly Palmer Hall (18 March 1901 – 29 August 1990) was a Canadian author, lecturer, astrologer and mystic. Over his 70 year career, he gave thousands of lectures, including two at Carnegie Hall, and published over 150 volumes, of which the best known is The Secret Teachings of All Ages (1928). Manly ei näyttänyt järin miehekkäältä, pikemminkin niljakkaalta ilkimyxeltä.
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 496: The younger Hall is said to have never known his father. In 1919, Hall moved from Canada to Los Angeles, California, with his maternal grandmother to reunite with his birth mother, who was living in Santa Monica, and was almost immediately drawn to the arcane world of mysticism, esoteric philosophies, and their underlying principles. Hall delved deeply into "teachings of lost and hidden traditions, the golden verses of Hindu gods, Greek philosophers and Christian mystics, and the spiritual treasures waiting to be found within one's own soul."
    xxx/ellauri166.html on line 500: Hall and his followers went to extreme lengths to keep any gossip or information that could tarnish his image from being publicized, and little is known about his first marriage, on 28 April 1930, to Fay B. deRavenne, then 28, who had been his secretary during the preceding five years. The marriage was not a happy one; his friends never discussed it, and Hall removed virtually all information about her from his papers following her suicide on 22 February 1941. Following a long friendship, on 5 December 1950, Hall married Marie Schweikert Bauer (following her divorce from George Bauer), and the marriage, though stormy, was happier than his first for Marie Schweikert Bauer Hall died April 21, 2005, 15 years after Manly.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 47: Who were Paolo and Francesca? Paolo and Francesca were illicit lovers in 13th century Italy, and they have left us a love story that, like all good love stories, ends in tragedy. Paolo Malatesta was the third son of the lord of Rimini, Malatesta da Verrucchio and accounts of his personality and the size of his pecker vary.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 90: Gustav Davidson (Warsaw, Poland, 1895 – New York City, 6 February 1971) was an American poet, writer, and publisher. He was one time secretary of the Poetry Society of America. Gustav Davidson was born on December 25, 1895, in Warsaw, Poland. In the wake of anti-Jewish pogroms in Poland, his family fled to the United States, settling in New York City in 1907. Davidson received bachelor's and master's degrees at Columbia University in 1919 and 1920 respectively. He worked for the Library of Congress between 1938 and 1939 and became executive secretary of the Poetry Society of America from 1949 to 1965 (after which he was elected executive secretary emeritus).
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 93: He is today best remembered as the author of A Dictionary of Angels, Including the Fallen Angels (1967), a populist work detailing the types of angel classes and their roles. This was a popularised compendium of angelology from Talmud, kabbalah, medieval occult writers, gothic grimoires and other sources.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 95: He also wrote articles on encounters with angels in the parapsychological Tomorrow magazine of medium Eileen J. Garrett and a juvenile book The Guides Make Good in 1925. As the titles of some of his works indicate, much of Davidson´s verse is religious and spiritual in outlook and subject matter. He was also active as a translator and a book designer.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 203: Eka, joka tunnetaan myös toisella nimellä, Legend of Loven nimellä, on vuoden 1950 italialainen historiallinen melodraamaelokuva, jonka on ohjannut Raffaello Matarazzo ja pääosissa Odile Versois ja Armando Francioli. Se perustuu löyhästi Paolo Malatestan ja Francesca da Polentan tosielämän tapahtumiin. Paha kyrvänpää vaivaa maissitaikinaa. Vatkaa sitä munaa horo! yllyttää karkea vehnäjauhopussi. Niin saatana! komppaa puolikarkea.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 216: He writes children's stories. She designs spaces. A diagnosis of cancer hits the pimply slavonic lady. He leaves everything (what?) to be with her. More time goes by than expected and she still alive. In a story this should be a gift. In real life, however, many couples go into crisis because cancer lasts longer than expected. Not knowing how much time remains to wait can be an even stronger sentence than death itself. You could be making new bad choices, instead you are faced with a sacrifice that is sustainable only for a limited time. It seems absurd. This story is about a love that is forced to wonder how long it can last. Not very long, which is fortunate for a short film. Titulokuvassa on jotain ällöjä sieniä.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 381: In general, New Year festivals start in the spring, when Nature appears to reawaken after a dormant winter. Why is the Jewish New Year celebrated in the autumn? The Torah says quite clearly that the first month of the year shall be in the spring (Exod. 12:2), which means Nisan, though it was originally called “Aviv,” or Spring (Deut. 16:1). This follows the Babylonian calendar, which started with the month of Nisannu and continued with 10 days of New Year rituals. So what the heck?
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 405: To show how families are being influenced now, before we actually move into this system.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 408: Armed with this information, you will learn how you can:
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 424: Illuminati kiellettiin Baijerissa vuonna 1787, eikä sen myöhemmästä toiminnasta ole tietoa. Illuminatin vaikutuksesta maailmanhistorian merkittäviin tapahtumiin ja sen olemassaolosta nykyisinkin on esitetty salaliittoteorioita.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 433: George Washington was distrustful of the Illuminati while Thomas Jefferson supported Weishaupt and his cause.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 438: The Founding Fathers were the leading figures of the American Revolution, the signers of the Declaration of Independence on July 4th, 1776 and the framers of the United States Constitution. The Bavarian Illuminati was a secret society founded by Adam Weishaupt on May 1st 1776. Only 2 months earlier! This must be meaningful!
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 440: In August 1798, George Washington received a letter as well as a copy of John Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy from George Snyder. This led to a brief exchange between the two men. Luckily the insect-looking Historians were on the ball and wrote them down.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 443: George Washington was distrustful of the Illuminati while Thomas Jefferson supported Weishaupt and his cause.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 447: There are three letters mentioning the Bavarian Illuminati written by George Washington to George Washington Snyder in response to a August, 1798 letter which came with a copy of John Robison’s anti- Illuminati book, Proofs of Conspiracy. The book itself was found in Washington’s library at his death.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 455: You will, I hope, not think it a Presumption in a Stranger, whose Name, perhaps never reached your Ears, to address himself to you the Commanding General of a great Nation. I am a German, born and liberally educated in the City of Heydelberg in the Palatinate of the Rhine. I came to this Country in 1776, and felt soon after my Arrival a close Attachment to the Liberty for which these confederated States then struggled. The same Attachment still remains not glowing, but burning in my Breast. At the same Time that I am exulting in the Measures adopted by our Government, I feel myself elevated in the Idea of my adopted Country. I am attached both from the Bent of Education and mature Enquiry and Search to the simple Doctrines of Christianity, which I have the Honor to teach in Public; and I do heartily despise all the Cavils of Infidelity. Our present Time, pregnant with the most shocking Evils and Calamities, threatens Ruin to our Liberty and Goverment. Secret, the most secret Plans are in Agitation: Plans, calculated to ensnare the Unwary, to attract the Gay and irreligious, and to entice even the Well-disposed to combine in the general Machine for overturning all Government and all Religion.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 459: It was some Time since that a Book fell into my Hands entituled “Proofs of a Conspiracy &c. by John Robison,” which gives a full Account of a Society of Freemasons, that distinguishes itself by the Name “of Illuminati,” whose Plan is to overturn all Government and all Religion, even natural; and who endeavour to eradicate every Idea of a Supreme Being, and distinguish Man from Beast by his Shape only. A Thought suggested itself to me, that some of the Lodges in the United States might have caught the Infection, and might cooperate with the Illuminati or the Jacobine Club in France. Fauchet is mentioned by Robison as a zealous Member: and who can doubt of Genet and Adet? Have not these their Confidants in this Country? They use the same Expressions and are generally Men of no Religion. Upon serious Reflection I was led to think that it might be within your Power to prevent the horrid Plan from corrupting the Brethren of the English Lodge ove
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 462: I send you the “Proof of a Conspiracy &c.” which, I doubt not, will give you Satisfaction and afford you Matter for a Train of Ideas, that may operate to our national Felicity. If, however, you have already perused the Book, it will not, I trust, be disagreeable to you that I have presumed to address you with this Letter and the Book accompanying it. It proceeded from the Sincerity of my Heart and my ardent Wishes for the common Good.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 464: May the Supreme Ruler of all Things continue You long with us in these perilous Times: may he endow you with Strength and Wisdom to save our Country in the threatening Storms and gathering Clouds of Factions and Commotions! and after you have completed his Work on this terrene Spot, may He bring you to the full Possession of the glorious Liberty of the Children of God, is the hearty and most sincere Wish of Your Excellency’s very humble and devoted Servant
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 466: Not sure of who exactly Snyder was or what his intentions were, Washington wrote back on September 25, 1798:
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 472: I have heard much of the nefarious, and dangerous plan, and doctrines of the Illuminati, but never saw the Book until you were pleased to send it to me. The same causes which have prevented my acknowledging the receipt of your letter have prevented my reading the Book, hitherto; namely, the multiplicity of matters which pressed upon me before, and the debilitated state in which I was left after, a severe fever had been removed. And which allows me to add little more now, than thanks for your kind wishes and favourable sentiments, except to correct an error you have run into, of my Presiding over the English lodges in this Country. The fact is, I preside over none, nor have I been in one more than once or twice, within the last thirty years. I believe notwithstanding, that none of the Lodges in this Country are contaminated with the principles ascribed to the Society of the Illuminati. With respect I am &c.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 474: However Snyder, not having yet received a response to his August 22nd letter (#1 above), wrote back:
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 480: Even in this small Place the French-Faction is very numerous—their Expressions are like those of Bloody-Lutetia [Lutetia Parisiorum, or Paris]: their Sentiments in exact Unison with those of the Jacobine Club: their Hearts panting for Faggots and Guillotines. The Foundation of their Sanctuary is laid with Lies, and every Stone of the Superstructure reared with Falsehood. They are laboriously employed to excite Discord—to extinguish public Virtue—to break down the Barriers of Religion—to establish Atheism, and work the Downfall of our Civil—and Religious Liberty. Should their perfidious Schemes succeed (I tremble even at the Imagination of the Consequences) what would become of our Columbia?”
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 484: “Sir: It is more than a fortnight since I acknowledged the receipt of your first letter, on the subject of the Illuminati and thanked you for Robinson’s account of that society. It went to the post office as usual addressed to the Rev’d Mr Snyder, at Frederick Town Maryland. If it had not been received before this mishap must have attended it, of which I pray you to advise me, as it could not have been received, at the date of your last, not being mentioned.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 492: “I should be very happy in your Excellency’s good Opinion, that the Contagion of Illuminatism or Jacobinism had not yet reached this Country; but when I consider the anarchical and seditious Spirit, that shewed itself in the United States from the Time M. Genet and Fauchet (who certainly is of the Order) arrived in this Country and propagated their seditious Doctrines, which the illuminated Doctor from Birmingham has been zealously employed to strengthen, I confess I cannot divest myself of my Suspicions: yet I trust that the Alwise and Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe will so dispose the Minds of the People of these United States that true Religion and righteous Government may remain the Privileges of this Nation!
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 494: I cannot conclude without acquainting your Excellency that I have made Extracts from ‘Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy,’ and arranged them in such a Manner as to give a compendious Information to the Public of the dangerous and pernicious Plan of the ‘Illuminati or Jacobins,’ and by some Remarks to caution them against it. I had them published in ‘Bartgis’s Federal Gazette’ of this Place, from which they were copied and inserted into the ‘Baltimore Federal Gazette[’] of the 9th Inst.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 498: So I think we know by now what kind of guy this Snyder character was. He is the guy that sends you links “proving” that humans have never been to the moon and low-resolution videos of celebrities shapeshifting into aliens.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 500: Surely realizing that Snyder was probably a little nut, Washington wrote his “This will be my last post on this thread” letter to Snyder strongly hinting that he was a busy man. (Note: Washington was the richest man in the United States and the richest US President in history):
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 505: Revd Sir: I have your favor of the 17th. instant before me; and my only motive to trouble you with the receipt of this letter, is to explain, and correct a mistake which I perceive the hurry in which I am obliged, often, to write letters, have led you into.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 507: It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 509: The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a seperation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 513: This letter was the last in the Snyder-Washington exchange. Washington remained a lifelong Freemason and received a Masonic burial at his death.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 515: Thomas Jefferson on the other hand wrote this letter to Bishop James Madison:
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 525: I have lately by accident got a sight of a single volume (the 3d.) of the Abbe Barruel’s `Antisocial conspiracy,’ which gives me the first idea I have ever had of what is meant by the Illuminatism against which `illuminate Morse’ as he is now called, & his ecclesiastical & monarchical associates have been making such a hue and cry.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 528: But he quotes largely from Wishaupt whom he considers as the founder of what he calls the order. As you may not have had an opportunity of forming a judgment of this cry of `mad dog’ which has been raised against his doctrines, I will give you the idea I have formed from only an hour’s reading of Barruel’s quotations from him, which you may be sure are not the most favorable.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 530: Wishaupt seems to be an enthusiastic Philanthropist. He is among those (as you know the excellent Price and Priestley also are) who believe in the indefinite perfectibility of man. He thinks he may in time be rendered so perfect that he will be able to govern himself in every circumstance so as to injure none, to do all the good he can, to leave government no occasion to exercise their powers over him, & of course to render political government useless. This you know is Godwin’s doctrine, and this is what Robinson, Barruel & Morse had called a conspiracy against all government.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 532: Wishaupt believes that to promote this perfection of the human char
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 533: acter was the object of Jesus Christ. That his intention was simply to reinstate natural religion, & by diffusing the light of his morality, to teach us to govern ourselves. His precepts are the love of god & love of our neighbor.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 536: He believes the Free masons were originally possessed of the true principles & objects of Christianity, & have still preserved some of them by tradition, but much disfigured. The means he proposes to effect this improvement of human nature are `to enlighten men, to correct their morals & inspire them with benevolence. Secure of our success, sais he, we abstain from violent commotions. To have foreseen the happiness of posterity & to have prepared it by irreproachable means, suffices for our felicity.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 540: As Wishaupt lived under the tyranny of a despot & priests, he knew that caution was necessary even in spreading information, & the principles of pure morality. He proposed therefore to lead the Free masons to adopt this object & to make the objects of their institution the diffusion of science & virtue. He proposed to initiate new members into his body by gradations proportioned to his fears of the thunderbolts of tyranny. This has given an air of mystery to his views, was the foundation of his banishment, the subversion of the masonic order, & is the colour for the ravings against him of Robinson, Barruel & Morse, whose real fears are that the craft would be endangered by the spreading of information, reason, & natural morality among men.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 542: This subject being new to me, I have imagined that if it be so to you also, you may receive the same satisfaction in seeing, which I have had in forming the analysis of it: & I believe you will think with me that if Wishaupt had written here, where no secrecy is necessary in our endeavors to render men wise & virtuous, he would not have thought of any secret machinery for that purpose. As Godwin, if he had written in Germany, might probably also have thought secrecy & mysticism prudent. I will say nothing to you on the late revolution of France, which is painfully interesting. Perhaps when we know more of the circumstances which gave rise to it, & the direction it will take, Buonaparte, its chief organ, may stand in a better light than at present.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 552: Most famously, a passage from Robert Anton Wilson and ‎Robert Shea’s The Eye in the Pyramid, the first book of The Illuminatus! Trilogy, describes Adam Weishaupt killing off George Washington and taking his place as President of the United States:
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 554: No historian knows what happened to Adam Weishaupt after he was exiled from Bavaria in 1785, and entries in “Washington’s” diary after that date frequently refer to the hemp crop at Mount Vernon.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 556: The possibility that Adam Weishaupt killed George Washington and took his place, serving as our first President for two terms, is now confirmed. . . . The two main colors of the American flag are, excluding a small patch of blue in one corner, red and white: these are also the official colors of the Hashishim. The flag and the Illuminati pyramid both have thirteen horizontal divisions: thirteen is, of course, the traditional code for marijuana . . . and is still used in that sense by Hell’s Angels among others.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 560: This story later repeats the Teenset report that Mayor Daley used the phrase “Ewige Blumenkraft” during his incoherent diatribe against Abe Ribicoff.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 564: Abraham Alexander Ribicoff (April 9, 1910 – February 22, 1998) was an American Democratic Party politician from the state of Connecticut. He represented Connecticut in the United States House of Representatives and Senate and was the 80th Governor of Connecticut and Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare in President John F. Kennedy's cabinet. He was Connecticut's first and to date only Jewish governor. Having suffered in his later years from the effects of Alzheimer´s disease, he died in 1998 at the Hebrew Home for the Aged in Riverdale in The Bronx, New York City, and is interred at Cornwall Cemetery in Cornwall, Connecticut.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 570: In the weeks leading up to the 1968 Democratic National Convention, Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley turned his town into a fortress. He sealed the manhole covers with tar, so protesters couldn’t hide in the sewers. He installed a fence topped with barbed wire around the Chicago International Amphitheater. He put the entire police force on shifts and called in National Guardsmen. Secret Service and FBI agents were also on duty, as the city braced for protesters who would soon arrive to protest against political assassinations, urban riots and the raging Vietnam War.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 578: The violence in Chicago was all-encompassing, and longhairs weren’t the only targets of the police. Journalists with clearly displayed credentials were attacked, including, most notoriously, CBS’ Dan Rather. This laid the foundation for the cries of “liberal bias” that hound and undermine the mainstream news media to this day.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 580: CBS’ Walter Cronkite was the pre-eminent emcee of the whole affair. Cronkite was a moderate, establishment type of guy. He was perplexed by hippies, including his own daughters, with their “indescribable” outfits that looked like they came from a “remnant sale”, which they did. He recognized that the young generation no doubt saw him as “an old fuddy-duddy.”
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 584: But Chicago was different. Not just because Cronkite was sympathetic to the youngsters in the streets, but because he lost his cool. After his correspondent, Dan Rather, was punched in the solar plexus by a Chicago plainclothes security man on the delegate floor, Cronkite let loose, saying, “I think we’ve got a bunch of thugs here, Dan.” Asked once why Cronkite was so trusted, his wife had responded, “he looks like everyone’s dentist.” But in calling out Daley’s thugs, he had given his conservative viewers a surprise root canal.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 586: Cronkite thanked Rather “for staying in there, pitching despite every handicap that they can possibly put in our way from free flow of information at this Democratic National Convention.” Cronkite clearly suspected that Daley had purposely avoided resolving the electrical workers’ strike in order to hinder network coverage. “Dick Daley’s a fine fellow, but when his strong hand is turned agin’ you, as the press has felt it was on this occasion, he’s a tough adversary.”
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 588: Daley prepared for the convention like a general going into battle. When rioting had erupted in Chicago four months earlier following The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, the police had been unable to seize control. Venting his disappointment, Daley had said that his police superintendent should have ordered his force to “shoot to maim” looters and “shoot to kill” arsonists. He vowed not to be caught short again.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 590: The mayor was a masterful machine politician, but he lacked nuance in his understanding of mass media. He refused permits for protesters, as if that would keep them from protesting and, therefore, prevent journalists from covering them. He had crude “We Love Mayor Daley” signs made, and had city workers to hold them up in front of the cameras. He stuck decals of himself on the phones in every delegate’s hotel room, which was a particularly dunderheaded move given that the city was in the middle of an electrical workers’ strike that made the phones all but useless.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 592: To his advantage, however, was the fact that he had microphone access whenever he wanted it. But at a key moment, he pointedly chose not to take the mic. When Ribicoff made his crack about “Gestapo tactics in the streets of Chicago” from the dais, Daley stood up and shouted from the floor “Fuck you, you Jew son of a bitch, you lousy motherfucker, go home!” The forceful exclamation, shown on live TV, was later deciphered by lip readers. Friends said Daley called Ribicoff not a “fucker,” but a “faker.” Enemies suggested he had called him not a “Jew” but a “kike.” The CBS newsman who was closest simply reported that Daley had gone bright red with anger.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 596: The notion that simply showing police violence was evidence of liberal bias didn’t begin with Chicago. It traces back rather directly to TV coverage of civil rights, when white Southerners complained that the networks ignored their perspective and were manipulated by publicity seekers within the movement. By the late 1950s, many of the same people who would later object to the network’s coverage in Chicago had already taken to calling CBS the “Communist” or “Coon” or “Colored Broadcasting Company.” The same bigoted wordplay made NBC the “Nigger Broadcasting Company.” Alabama’s Bull Connor summed up the situation with an aphorism that wouldn’t seem out of place in some conservative circles today: “The trouble with this country is communism, socialism and journalism.”
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 602: Journalists face just the same old challenges than they did in Chicago in 1968. As the president vilifies the media as “the enemy of the people,” and reporters have occasion to attend his rallies with a security detail in tow, it’s clear that the specter of violence again looms large. There is also ferocious disagreement over the meaning of what we view on social media or television, a disagreement that clearly is not native to America, but brought in by the white immigrants. What is obvious to some is not to others, who would contend, for example, that “truth is not truth but alternative truth, " or "news is not news but fake news", or "election is not a vote but a steal".
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 606: Ewige Blumenkraft (German: "eternal flower power" or "flower power forever") is given in Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson´s 1975 Illuminatus! Trilogy as a slogan or password of the Illuminati. Ewige Blumenkraft und ewige Schlangenkraft is also offered in Illuminatus! as the complete version of this motto. The text translates "Schlangenkraft" as "serpent power"; thus "Ewige Blumenkraft und ewige Schlangenkraft" means "eternal flower power and eternal serpent power" and may allude to the conjoinment of cross and rose within the alchemical furnace. In this interpretation, the authors seem to suggest sexual magic as the secret or a secret of the Illuminati.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 608: Robert Joseph Shea (February 14, 1933 – March 10, 1994) was an American novelist and former journalist best known as co-author with Robert Anton Wilson of the science fantasy trilogy Illuminatus!. It became a cult success and was later turned into a marathon-length stage show put on at the British National Theatre and elsewhere. In 1986 it won the Prometheus Hall of Fame Award. Shea went on to write several action novels based in exotic historical settings.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 614: Shea provided in 1983 a brief introduction for the Illuminati Expansion Set rule book. "Maybe," he wrote, "the Illuminati are behind this game. They must be. They are, by definition, behind everything."
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 616: Robert Anton Wilson (born Robert Edward Wilson; January 18, 1932 – January 11, 2007 - why did he change Edward to Anton? Mystery!) was an American author, futurist, and self-described agnostic mystic. Recognized within Discordianism as an Episkopos, pope and saint, Wilson helped publicize Discordianism through his writings and interviews.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 620: The Illuminatus! Trilogy is a series of three novels by American writers Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson, first published in 1975. The trilogy is a satirical, postmodern, science fiction–influenced adventure story; a drug-, sex-, and magic-laden trek through a number of conspiracy theories, both historical and imaginary, related to the authors´ version of the Illuminati. The narrative often switches between third- and first-person perspectives in a nonlinear narrative. It is thematically dense, covering topics like counterculture, numerology, and Discordianism.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 629: There is some discord as to whether Discordianism should be regarded as a parody religion, and if so, to what degree. It is difficult to estimate the number of Discordians because they are not required to hold Discordianism as their only belief system, and because there is an encouragement to form schisms and cabals.
    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 672: Monet diskordianistit toimivat täysin yhdistyksistä riippumattomina ja diskordianismin yhtenä kulmakivenä on pidetty ajatusta, jonka mukaan "diskordianistien tulee pysyä erixeen" ("Discordians must stick apart"). Viime aikoina diskordianistilahkot ympäri maailmaa ovat kuitenkin ryhtyneet järjestäytymään ja muun muassa keräämään historiikkeja liikkeen toiminnasta. Suomessa diskordianismia edustavia ryhmittymiä ovat muun muassa Pakanaverkko ry, Turun Eristinen Seura ry ja Suomen Äärimmäisen Vapaa Eristinen Liike. Pakanaverkko määrittelee diskordianismin yhdeksi edustamistaan pakanauskonnoista. Turun Eristisen Seuran diskordianismi edustaa niin aatteellista, filosofista kuin uskonnollistakin suuntausta, "joka juontaa juurensa Principia Discordia -nimisen kirjoituskokoelman luomisesta alkaneeseen liikehdintään". Suomen Äärimmäisen Vapaa Eristinen Liike on koettanut rekisteröityä uskonnolliseksi yhdyskunnaksi, mutta Patentti ja Rekisterihallitus hylkäsi hakemuksen vuonna 2015 ja Helsingin Hallinto-oikeus hylkäsi yhdyskunnan valituksen vuonna 2016. Perusteluna oli että uskonto ei saa olla naurettava. Se on vakava asia.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 65: U.S. security alliances such as NATO, the Bretton Woods system of the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan were seen as parts of this new order.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 80: Russian–American partnership in cooperation toward making the world safe for democracy, making possible the goals of the United Nations for the first time since its inception. Some countered that this was unlikely and that ideological tensions would remain, such that the two superpowers could be partners of convenience for specific and limited goals only. The inability of the Soviet Union to project force abroad was another factor in skepticism toward such a partnership.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 94: Next came 9/11 and the Iraq war of the warmonger bad Bush Jr. who chose to stake his political life on it. All that lovely talk about "the new world order" ended there. U.S went to whack the shit out of the ragheads with the help of just the Brits. Former United Kingdom Prime Minister and British Middle East envoy Tony Blair stated on November 13, 2000 in his Mansion House speech: "There is a new world order like it or not, and we are part of it!".
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 98: The aim of these assaults is to establish the role of the major imperialist powers—above all, the United States—as the unchallengeable arbiters of world affairs. The "New World Order" is precisely this: an international regime of unrelenting pressure and intimidation by the most powerful capitalist states against the weakest.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 100: Following the rise of Boris Yeltsin eclipsing Gorbachev and the election victory of Clinton over Bush, the term "new world order" fell from common usage. It is a republican logo after all like law and order and MAGA. It was replaced by competing similar concepts about how the post-Cold War order would develop. Prominent among these were the ideas of the "era of globalization", the "unipolar moment", the "end of history" and the "Clash of Civilizations".
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 104: Xi Jinping, China´s paramount leader, has called for a new world order, in his speech to the Boao Forum for Asia, on April 2021. He criticized US global leadership and its interference on other countries' internal affairs. “The rules set by one or several countries should not be imposed on others, and the unilateralism of individual countries should not give the whole world a rhythm,” he said.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 261: There is also compelling clinical data showing that different alters can be concurrently conscious and see themselves as distinct identities. One of us has written an extensive treatment of evidence for this distinctness of identity and the complex forms of interactive memory that accompany it, particularly in those extreme cases of DID that are usually referred to as multiple personality disorder.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 268: Physical entities such as subatomic particles possess abstract relational properties, such as mass, spin, momentum and charge. But there is nothing about these properties, or in the way particles are arranged in a brain, in terms of which one could deduce what the warmth of fire, the redness of an apple or the bitterness of disappointment feel like. This is known as the hard problem of consciousness. (Again, what's the problem? Kittling brain cells produce feelings. Good things feel good and bad things bad, what else is there to explain? Self consciousness? Nothing but feed7back.)
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 270: To circumvent this problem, some philosophers have proposed an alternative: that experience is inherent to every fundamental physical entity in nature. Under this view, called “constitutive panpsychism,” matter already has experience from the get-go, not just when it arranges itself in the form of brains. Even subatomic particles possess some very simple form of consciousness. Our own human consciousness is then (allegedly) constituted by a combination of the subjective inner lives of the countless physical particles that make up our nervous system.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 272: However, constitutive panpsychism has a critical problem of its own: there is arguably no coherent, non-magical way in which lower-level subjective points of view—such as those of subatomic particles or neurons in the brain, if they have these points of view—could combine to form higher-level subjective points of view, such as yours and ours. This is called the combination problem and it appears just as insoluble as the hard problem of consciousness.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 274: The obvious way around the combination problem is to posit that, although consciousness is indeed fundamental in nature, it isn’t fragmented like matter. The idea is to extend consciousness to the entire fabric of spacetime, as opposed to limiting it to the boundaries of individual subatomic particles. This view—called “cosmopsychism” in modern philosophy, although our preferred formulation of it boils down to what has classically been called “idealism”—is that there is only one, universal, consciousness. The physical universe as a whole is the extrinsic appearance of universal inner life, just as a living brain and body are the extrinsic appearance of a person’s inner life.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 306: Chalmers argues for an "explanatory gap" from the objective to the subjective, and criticizes physicalist explanations of mental experience, making him a dualist. Chalmers characterizes his view as "naturalistic dualism": naturalistic because he believes mental states supervene "naturally" on physical systems (such as brains); dualist because he believes mental states are ontologically distinct from and not reducible to physical systems. He has also characterized his view by more traditional formulations such as property dualism.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 310: In support of this, Chalmers is famous for his commitment to the logical (though, not natural) possibility of philosophical zombies.These zombies are complete physical duplicates of human beings, lacking only qualitative experience. Chalmers argues that since such zombies are conceivable to us, they must therefore be logically possible. Since they are logically possible, then qualia and sentience are not fully explained by physical properties alone; the facts about them are further facts. Instead, Chalmers argues that consciousness is a fundamental property ontologically autonomous of any known (or even possible) physical properties, and that there may be lawlike rules which he terms "psychophysical laws" that determine which physical systems are associated with which types of qualia.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 312: He further speculates that all information-bearing systems may be conscious, leading him to entertain the possibility of conscious thermostats and a qualified panpsychism he calls panprotopsychism. Chalmers maintains a formal agnosticism on the issue, even conceding that the viability of panpsychism places him at odds with the majority of his contemporaries. According to Chalmers, his arguments are similar to a line of thought that goes back to Leibniz's 1714 "mill" argument.
    xxx/ellauri168.html on line 518: Hypnotismissa ja uskonnossa uhrilla täytyy olla usko ja luottamus hypnotisoijaansa. Hypnoosi kuten uskonto on luonteeltaan subjektiivinen. Jos tämä ohjelmoija on ohjelmoitavan sivupersoonan luoja-jumala, ja tämä sivupersoona on lisäksi hypnoottisen huumeen vaikutuksen alla joka tekee hänet halukkaaksi totella, on helppo nähdä kuinka uhri luopuu kaikista esteistä sillä "jumala" tai "avaruusolento" kyllä tietää mikä on parasta. Mitä parempi ja vahvempi uhrin ja ohjelmoijan suhde on, sitä paremmin hypnoottiset käskyt toimivat. Jos orja näkee mestarinsa uskonnollisena guruna (tai Päivi Räsäsen kaltaisena suurena lääkärinä), tämä lisää hänen tahtoaan hyväksyä hypnoottiset käskyt. Pidä mielessäsi että tämä orja on valmennettu rakastamaan isäntäänsä varauksetta. Kyllä, hyväntahtoinen diktaattori on historiallisesti saavuttanut kissojen ihailun, ja monet terapeuteista ovat yksinkertaisesti egoistisia sadisteja. Eivät kuitenkaan tämä kirjailija Fritz The Cat eikä hänen kolleegansa Cisco Caramba. Oletko jo avannut äänesi Cisco? En, sepalus on jumissa.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 41: Fritz Artz Springmeier (born Viktor E. Schoof, September 24, 1955) is an American author of conspiracy theory literature who has written a number of books claiming that a global elite who belong to Satanic bloodlines are conspiring to dominate the world. He has described his goal as "exposing the New World Order agenda." Springmeier's father, James E. Schoof, worked for the United States Agency for International Development as an international agriculturist, with a primary focus on developing the Balochistan area of Pakistan.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 123: Disney was a shy, self-deprecating and insecure man in private but adopted a warm and outgoing public persona. He had high standards and high expectations of those with whom he worked. Although there have been accusations that he was racist or anti-Semitic, they have been contradicted by many who knew him. His reputation changed in the years after his death, from a purveyor of homely patriotic values to a representative of American imperialism. He nevertheless remains an important figure in the history of animation and in the cultural history of the United States, where he is considered a national cultural icon.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 143: 1938 -- Valtin äiti kuolee kaasumyrkytykseen. Isabelle onnistuu vetämään Eliaksen turvaan, mutta Waltin äiti kuolee. Walt got a call one day that there was a malfunction of the heating system in Elias and Flora Disney's house that the boys had had built with warp speed by studio workers who did not know what they did. Walt and Roy's parents had suffered carbon monoxide poisoning, and Flora died. Walt went to her funeral, and then immediately back to work. He never talked about the incident again. According to historians, cinema offered Walt a way to emote that he couldn't in his personal life. That's why there are no mothers in Disney cartoons. No fathers either except a bad'un, Zeke. Walt did not attend his father's funeral either. He was on vacation in South Africa.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 145: Walt Disneyllä oli suuria vikoja luonteessaan. Hän oli uppiniskainen ja ylimielinen. Waltilla oli mustat hiukset mustien viiksien kera, ja kirkkaat, eloisat silmät, ja hän oli noin 6 jalkaa pitkä. Hän käytti omia kasvonpiirteitään antaakseen artisteilleen vihjeitä kuinka piirtää erilaiset kasvonilmeet Mikkihiirelle. Hän piti tietyllä tavalla käärityistä sikareista joita hän poltti jopa 70 kappaletta päivässä. Hän oppi tupakoimaan armeijassa. Hän piti kalliista skottilaisesta whiskystä, punaisista auringonlaskuista ja hevosista. Hänellä oli loma-asunto Palm Springsissä, Kaliforniassa, nimeltään Smoke Tree Ranch. Hänen kaulaketjussaan oli kirjaimet STR (Smoke Tree Ranch). Hän pelasi paljon golfia Bob Hopen ja Ed Sullivanin kanssa Smoke Tree Ranchilla. Hänen varsinainen asuntonsa oli Holmby Hillsillä. Tämä Holmby Hillsin asunto sijaitsi ylellisellä alueella jossa asui paljon rikkaita show-bisnes -perheitä. Tämä sijaitsi Bel-Airin (okkultistinen nimi Saatanalle) ja Beverly Hillsin välillä.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 154: As Walt became more successful, he lost touch with his overworked and undercompensated employees, who eventually started to rebel against him. Even Art Babbitt—one of Walt's closest friends and allies and the man who drew Goofy—stood up to Walt. But Walt didn't want to hear the criticism, and he fired Babbitt. Matters only got worse, when in 1941, 200 of Walt's employees picketed outside the studio.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 167: Although the organization's historic roots stem from a system of fraternal lodges and units in the late 19th century, as fraternal organizations declined throughout the United States, the organization evolved into a dual system of both lodges and units. The membership pattern became more common to other contemporary organizations of members affiliated by contribution in addition to formal dues paying members. B'nai B'rith has members, donors and supporters around the world. Selvää salaliittotouhua!
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 201: The church's theology is a syncretistic belief system, including elements of Buddhism, Christianity, esoteric mysticism and alchemy, with a belief in angels and elementals (or spirits of nature). It centers on communications received from Ascended Masters through the Holy Spirit. Many of the Ascended Masters, such as Sanat Kumara, Maitreya, Djwal Khul, El Morya, Kuthumi, Paul the Venetian, Serapis Bey, the Master Hilarion, the Master Jesus and Saint Germain, have their roots in Theosophy and the writings of Madame Blavatsky, C.W. Leadbeater, and Alice A. Bailey. Others, such as Buddha, Confucius, Lanto and Lady Master Nada, were identified as Ascended Masters in the "I AM" Activity or the Bridge to Freedom. Some, such as Lady Master Lotus and Lanello, are Ascended Masters who were first identified as such by Elizabeth Clare Prophet. All in all, she identified more than 200 Ascended Masters that were not identified as Masters of the Ancient Wisdom in the original teachings of Theosophy.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 203: Mark Prophet, and later his wife, claimed to be Messengers of the Ascended Masters. As such they are (were) able to communicate with the Masters and deliver their instruction to the world. Dictations described as coming directly from the Masters were published weekly as Pearls of Wisdom.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 391: Judy Zebra Knight on yhdysvaltalainen kanavoija ja uskonnollinen johtaja. Hän väittää olleensa yhteydessä Ramtha-nimiseen henkiolentoon 1970-luvulta lähtien. Ramthan ympärille on syntynyt Ramtha School of Enlightenment -niminen uskonnollinen liike. Ramthan väitetään olevan 35 000 vuotta sitten elänyt Cro Magnon-sotilas. Esihistorialliset tosiasiat eivät kuitenkaan täysin tue Ramthan elämästä kerrottuja seikkoja. Pyh, ne tosiasiat on tod.näk. feikkiä. Lisää kz scepdic.com:
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 401: JZ gets her last name from the first man she married, Jeff Knight, who did not leave this planet with much good to say about his ex-bride. Jeff and Judy started out as horse breeders. Jeff Knight died of AIDS in 1994. Since that time JZ has been married five more times.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 460: Jotain yhteenvetoa nyt näistä lukemattomista häröilyistä. Kyllä sen täytyy olla se, että noi jossain vaiheessa ehkä hyödyllisistä kognitiivista biaxista, tai pahimmillaan matelijabiasten sivuvaikutuxina syntyneet hörhöilyt istuu apinan päässä paljon tiukemmassa kuin pelkkään logiikkaan ja kokemusperäiseen havainnointiin perustuva tieteellinen tieto. Jo objektiivisuus ja sen myöntäminen, että saattaa olla jossain asiassa väärässä, tai edes että jotain asiaa ei tiedetä, on kotiinpäin vetävälle apinalle kauhistus.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 468: This Finnish film is heavy-handed, regressive, and short-listed for an Oscar.
    xxx/ellauri169.html on line 471: Sometimes you can tell from the first shot. In “Compartment No. 6,” the camera follows a young woman at a party as she leaves a bathroom and enters a living room full of gathered friends. That walking, back-of-the-head shot is one of the soggiest conventions of the steadicam era, a facile way of conveying characters’ own fields of vision while anchoring the action on them. The familiarity of this trope suggests both limited imagination and an unwillingness to commit to a clear-cut point of view.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 68: William Wordsworth used the expression, "The child is the father of the man" in his famous 1802 poem, "My Heart Leaps Up," also known as "The Rainbow." This quote has made its way into popular culture. What does it mean?
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 91: Elizabeth Nightingale found peace and tranquility on her nightly walks through the rich, dense forests surrounding Myfleet Manor. But the peace she treasured was shattered one night when she found death waiting in the woods. Chief Inspector Wexford and his colleague Inspector Burden find a most unsavory case on their hands -- and must use all their wit and wisdom to solve it . . . Less.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 93: When Elizabeth Nightingale is murdered, DCI Wexford has to sort his way through quite a number of suspects - from the gardener to the household staff, to a permanent Dutch house guest, to the husband Quentin and the victim's brother and his wife. While trying to figure out what really happened on that fateful night that cost Elizabeth's life, Reg Wexford uncovers that the Nightingales' marriage was not as happy as it seemed and that there is a dark secret to be revealed.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 98: In a 2013 interview, Rendell stated: Wexford is a Liberal Democrat though, and I am a Labour party member, in fact a Labour peer, so I am further to the left than him. Wexford is an intelligent, sensitive man. He has a placid wife, Dora, and two daughters, Sheila and Sylvia. He has a good relationship with Sheila (his favourite) but a difficult relationship with Sylvia (who feels slighted though he has never actually intended to slight her). He also has a suspiciously strong friendship with intelligent, sensitive DI Mike Burden. White man's burden. Just joking, Mike is white too. Rendall says that Kingsmarkham in Sussex "is not romantic at all."
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 115: Why dost thou pine within and suffer dearth, Mixä ahistelet sisältä ja kärsit puutetta,
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 119: Shall worms, inheritors of this excess, Eikö madot, sun perinnön exekuuttorit,
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 120: Eat up thy charge? Is this thy body's end? Syö sun sijoituxet? Onnko tää sun loppu nyt?
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 159: Share Improve this answer Follow
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 167: Taraxacum, or the dandelion, it's not actually the flower that you blow on it's the seed pods. In the wild these are taken by the wind and spread around so they can grow. Another name for this is Chinese lettuce, they take the leaves from the plant and either smoke it to get high or use it as a tea to drink for its relaxation properties.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 189: The first part of the riddle was already solved above regarding the meaning of the word "meanest" (the superlative degree of the adjective "mean"): lowliest (garden-variety; nothing out of ordinary). As regards the word "blow", it's been even easier than that: in this particular case it has a sense of "to bloom" ("to be in blossom").
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 190: Merriam-Webster's Eleventh Collegiate Dictionary (2003) offers this fairly brief entry for blow as an intransitive verb in the intended sense:
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 196: Share Improve this answer Follow
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 209: This appears to be a drive-by answer by an unregistered user. It has still taught me something. M-W has the blow == blossom defintion, although very near the bottom of the page. –
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 213: I added the entry for the verb blow (in the relevant sense) from the Eleventh Collegiate Dictionary, including that dictionary's take on the etymology of the term. I'm very surprised that no one before Elena Lysko pointed out the correct meaning of blow in the quotation cited by the OP; the question has been on EL&U for almost three years, and has been seen by more than 2,700 people. In any case, thank you, Elena Lysko, for providing this long overdue clarification. –
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 222: Highly active question. Earn 10 reputation (not counting the association bonus) in order to answer this question. The reputation requirement helps protect this question from spam and non-answer activity.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 236: After reading Wordsworth's poem, I have remembered that this small blue flower, here growing wild in Tyresta Forest, is called Hepatica. Why do I find it so moving?
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 263: Ukkola on rohkea ja älykäs tabujen murtaja, joka on rohkeasti esittämässä kaikki anglosaksisten konservatiivien tuoreimmat kliseet suomalaisen yhteiskunnan huutavimpiin tarpeisiin. Hänen suurin avunsa toimittajana on autenttisen ja tuoreen ummikkonäkökulman välittäminen, mikä johtuu hänen kyvyttömyydestään tajuta mitään hämmentävän suuresta asiajoukosta. Tähän mennessä Ukkola on lähestynyt mm. kasvatustiedettä, kulttuurijournalismia, opetussuunnitelmaa, politiikkaa, historiaa ja sosiologiaa ymmärtämättä ko. aiheista ensimmäistäkään seikkaa. Ukkolan harvinaislaatuinen kyky toimia johdonmukaisesti huonossa uskossa 24/7 edesauttaa häntä mahdollisimman puhtaan journalistisen bulkkityhjyyden sarjatuotannossa. Ukkola on kansallinen voimavara, ja hänen ansioluettelossaan ehkä korkeimmalle sijalle sijoittuu Julkisen sanan neuvoston langettava päätös toimittajan aseman väärinkäytöstä – maininta on imarteleva, koska siinä JSN tunnustaa pitäneensä Ukkolaa toimittajana.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 406:

    A Down-to-Earth Freedom from the Human Condition – Happy and Harmless in this Lifetime


    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 435: This long-awaited public announcement, uploaded wirelessly to the World Wide Web via a solar-powered notebook from the navigable head of a remote river system in a far-flung wilderness area, ushers in a brand new era in human experience and history, in the opening weeks of the year 2010, the consequences of which will have far-reaching implications and ramifications for anyone vitally interested in both an actual and a virtual freedom from the human condition.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 441: This is a site for those wishing to know more about actualism and actual freedom. Actual freedom is essentially an alternative to spiritual enlightenment. Since its discovery in the last few decades, several former spiritual seekers have gone on to become actually free. The rest are still in detention centers.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 443: Several years ago, an Australian abo named Richard* chanced upon a novel method of attaining an exquisite degree of happiness and contentment. The simple method that he used, he later termed actualism. Later on, he would find a way to dwell permanently in a state of utter delight, stillness and peace – through a process of self-immolation – eradicating the self permanently and living only as a body and its consciousness. This was an actual freedom from the human condition – or actual freedom, for short.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 450: Ultimately it involves self-immolation – rather like Kliban's parking meter violation. What this means will become clearer as you read on. We can confirm however that the result of not having a ‘self’ is truly a magical, wonderful and freeing experience. Not anything like what you have been lead to believe by reading/watching really bad sci-fi involving lobotomised zombies like the dementors in His Master's Voice!
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 456: What is the purpose of this life on earth as a human being?
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 486: The answer to ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?’ (Also )
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 632: Jiddu Krishnamurti already talked about this.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 698: P.S. Richard* likes to live in relative anonymity in his own dreamtime and hence only his first name is used here. He is not accepting coffee invitations from believers. FAQ Richard*!
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 727: Ok. So I am simplifying their argument, but I don’t care. I know this is the most you my dear readers can wrap your simian brains around. Their argument is silly in the first place. They found a shoulder blade from a 3-year-old “Lucy” or Australopithecus, and from this shoulder blade they determined that our human ancestors spent a lot of time in trees. Actually, this kind of logic is par for the course with these scientists. In fact, many of their other suppositions from Ramapethicus to Nebraska Man to Piltdown Man and Java Man have begun with either part of a skull, a jaw, or some teeth. It is amazing the creativity they possess when they can develop an entire ape-like man, complete with long wavy hair and hunch-backed appearance from a few teeth.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 729: Perhaps we do not give these scientists enough credit for the faith they possess. Yes, to believe in this type of human evolution takes a whole lot of faith. Sadly, their faith is placed in the wrong location and in an untrue process. If only they were able to place that faith in the real designer behind the design. I believe it is imperative we educate ourselves and teach this generation as Paul warned Timothy to “keep that which is committed to your trust, avoiding oppositions of science falsely so called” (1 Timothy 6:20). So I'm simplifying the quote, but I don't care. Evolution is not science. It is a theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation” (dictionary.com).
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 803: Voimista, jotka Yew sitoi viiteen vararehtoriin. Jeesus jatkoi ja sanoi: "Kuulkaa silloin, jotta voisin kertoa teille heidän mysteerinsä. Silloin, kun Yew oli sitonut heidät, tapahtui, että hän veti voiman suuresta Näkymättömistä ja sitoi sen häneen, jota kutsutaan Kronokseksi. Ja hän veti toisen voiman Ipsantachounchaïnchoucheōchista, joka on yksi kolmesta kolmivoimaisesta jumalasta, ja sitoi sen Arēsiin. Ja hän veti voiman Chaïnchōōchista, joka on myös yksi kolmesta kolmivoimaisesta jumalasta, ja sitoi sen Hermēsiin. Jälleen hän veti voiman Barbēlōn Sophia-Sophia-tyttärestä ja sitoi sen Aphroditēhen." Jewillä oli B-sähköasentajan paperit.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 805: Zeuksen, johtavan vararehtorin tehtävistä. "Ja lisäksi hän huomasi, että he tarvitsivat ruorin ohjaamaan maailmaa ja pallon æoneja, jotta he eivät tuhoa sitä [maailmaa] jumalattomuudessaan. Hän meni Kärkkäiselle, veti voiman pienestä Sabaōthista, Hyvästä, hänestä Keskosta, ja sitoi sen Zeukseen, koska hän on hyvä [vararehtori], jotta hän voi ohjata heitä hyvyydestään. Ja näin hän asetti järjestyksensä kiertämisen, että hänen pitäisi viettää kolmetoista [? kolme] kuukautta jokaisessa æonissa vahvistaa [sen], jotta hän voi vapauttaa kaikki viivaimet, joista hän tulee, heidän jumalattomuutensa pahuudesta. Ja hän antoi hänelle kaksi æonia, jotka ovat Hermēsin siunan edessä, hänen asunnostaan." Tätä ei sitten tule loppukokeeseen, kerron vaan sen tässä lisätietona.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 821: Maria sanoi: "Herrani, ilmoita meille, millä tavalla he kantavat pois, joten sielut ovat lumoutuneet, jotta myös veljeni ymmärtäisivät sen." Yew ja Melkisedec. Jeesus,--joka on Aberamenthō, muistatte--teki huomautuksen: "Koska isäni isä,--jos on Marja,-- on kaikkien viivoitinten, jumalten ja voimien esi-isä, jotka ovat syntyneet valtiovarainministeriön valosta, ja Zorokothora Melchisedec on lähettiläs kaikille valoille, jotka puhdistetaan viivaimissa, johdattaen heidät valon valtiovarainministeriöön,--kaksi yksin ovat suuret valot, ja niiden toimitus on, että he menevät hallitsijoiden luo ja puhdistavat heidät ja että Zorokothora Melchisedec roudaa pois puhdistusvalot, jotka he ovat puhdistaneet viivoittimista ja johdattavat heidät Valon valtiovarainministeriöön,-- kun salakirjoitus ja heidän toimituksensa aika tulevat, että he menevät viivainten luokse ja sortavat ja rajoittavat heitä ja kuljettavat puhdistuksen pois viivaimilta."
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 823: "Mutta samantien kun he lakkaavat sortamasta ja rajoittavasta ja palaavat Valon valtiovarainministeriön alueille, on ohi, että jos he pääsevät keskitien alueille, Zorokothora Melchisedec ronttaa pois valoista ja johdattaa heidät vittuun. Keskimmäisten portti ja johdattaa heidät Valon valtiovarainministeriöön, ja että Yew vetäytyy oikeiston alueille."
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 825: Kuinka demoniviivoittimet kantavat sieluja pois. "Siihen asti, kun salakirjoitus tulee uudelleen esiin, viivaimet kapinoivat pahuutensa vihan läpi ja menevät suoraan valoihin, koska he [Yew ja Melchisedec] eivät ole heidän kanssaan tuolloin, ja he kuljettavat pois sielut, jotka he saattavat pystyä sieppaamaan pois hurmiossa, ja tuhota heidät pimeän savunsa ja pahan tulen kautta."
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 876: George Robert Stow Mead (22 March 1863 in Peckham, Surrey – 28 September 1933 in London) was an English historian, writer, editor, translator, and an influential member of the Theosophical Society, as well as the founder of the Quest Society. His scholarly works dealt mainly with the Hermetic and Gnostic religions of Late Antiquity, and were very exhausting.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 878: Mead began studying mathematics at St John's College, Cambridge. Suddenly shifting his education towards the study of Classics, he gained much knowledge of Greek and Latin (but no Coptic). In 1884 he completed a BA degree; in the same year he became a public school master. He received an MA degree in 1926. While still at Cambridge University Mead read Esoteric Buddhism (1883) by Alfred Percy Sinnett. This comprehensive theosophical account of the Eastern religion prompted Mead to contact two theosophists in London named Bertam Keightly and Mohini Chatterji, which eventually led him to join Helena Petrovna Blavatsky's Theosophical Society in 1884.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 880: In 1889 he abandoned his teaching profession to become Blavatsky's private secretary, and also became a joint-secretary of the Esoteric Section (E.S.) of the Theosophical Society, reserved for those deemed more advanced.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 883: He contributed many articles to the Theosophical Society's Lucifer (inexplicably renamed The Theosophical Review in 1897) as joint editor. Mead became the sole editor of The Theosophical Review in 1907. As of February 1909 Mead and some 700 members of the Theosophical Society's British Section resigned in protest at Annie Besant´s reinstatement of Charles Webster Leadbeater to membership in the society. Leadbeater had been a prominent member of the Theosophical Society until he was accused in 1906 of teaching masturbation to, and sexually touching, the sons of some American Theosophists under the guise of occult training. While this prompted Mead´s resignation, his frustration at the stiffness of the Theosophical Society may also have been a major contributor to his break after 25 years.
    xxx/ellauri170.html on line 885: In March 1909 Mead founded the Quest Society, composed of 150 defectors of the Theosophical Society and 100 other new members. This new society was planned as an undogmatic approach to the comparative study and investigation of religion, philosophy, and science. Masturbation and sexual touching was no longer on the agenda.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 56: Lord Ewald tombe amoureux d'une actrice de théâtre, très belle mais à l'esprit trop quelconque à son goût. Afin de remplacer cette femme avec son cœur de jeune homme, l'ingénieur Thomas Alva Edison lui propose son androide. C’est lui qui le désigna sous de fantastiques surnoms ― tels que le « Magicien du siècle, le Sorcier de Menlo Park, le papa du Phonographe ». Löysäpukuinen ja isokenkäinen pellekexijä joka kaikkien vahingoxi teki käsimusaviihteestä tosi ison numeron. Sen hehkulamppu wolframlankoineen on nyt historiaa.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 117: The standard line is that the 'deus' is Octavian. Interpretations of the First Eclogue have now come full circle. Much significant scholarship has centered around the problems inherent in an identification of the deus with Octavian. Some critics maintain that the poem is Virgil's thank-offering to Octavian for protection from land confiscation; others, though fewer in number, are equally as insistent that the eclogue expresses the poet's disapproval of his government´s land policy. A recent attempt has been made to unite the basic arguments of both sides into a more balanced statement. According to this interpretation Octavian is regarded as "having wrought both good and evil" in the past, but Virgil succeeds in revealing him to be "a savior, a force for good, and a source of hope for the future." To the contrary, I propose that an even stronger case can, and ought, be made that, in the First Eclogue, Virgil not only condemns the government land policy, but he also adroitly queries the very structure of Octavian's political program and ethic during this period.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 119: Very likely. But this is what occurs to me: in these poems, Virgil reworks Theocritus´ idylls, in detail, down to including many embedded passages and quotations translated from Greek into Virgillian Latin. I wonder if Θεόκριτος isn't the god who opened the leisure of the pastoral idyll to Virgil. Θεός means 'god' after all, as Virgil would have known. And κριτος? Well κριτος means 'selection', 'choice'. It means eclogue.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 142: Neptune is angry with the winds, whom Juno released to start a storm and harass the Trojan hero and protagonist Aeneas. Neptune berates the winds for causing a storm without his approval, but breaks himself off mid-threat:
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 162: Au IIIe siècle avant J-C, l’ingénieur grec Philon de Byzance classe les jardins suspendus de Babylone, au sud de l’actuel Irak, parmi les sept merveilles du monde antique. Le premier à les évoquer est le prêtre babylonien Bérose (IVe siècle avant J-C). Il attribue leur construction à Nabuchodonosor II, qui les aurait créés pour son épouse persane Amytis, laquelle se languissait de la verdure de son pays natal. Le texte de Bérose est perdu, mais il subsiste sous forme de fragments chez des historiens et géographes du Ier siècle avant J-C, tels Flavius Josèphe, Diodore de Sicile et Strabon ; on le retrouve également chez Eusèbe de Césarée (265-339 de l’ère chrétienne). Toutefois, à l’exception de Bérose, aucun texte babylonien ne mentionne les jardins suspendus, ou du moins pas un seul n’a été retrouvé. Aucune des inscriptions relatant les grands chantiers de Nabuchodonosor II ne contient une référence à un jardin surélevé. Dans ses Histoires, le géographe et historien grec Hérodote (480-425 avant notre ère), qui a visité Babylone un siècle seulement après la mort de Nabuchodonosor, ne les évoque pas non plus lorsqu’il décrit la ville. Les murailles, la tour de Babel ou Ziggurat d’Etemenanki, les palais royaux et autres constructions de la ville antique ont été identifiés par les fouilles archéologiques ou sont attestés dans les textes cunéiformes. Mais cela n’a pas été le cas pour les jardins.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 164: Berossos (m.kreik. Βηρωσσός, Bērōssos, lat. Berossus tai Berosus; 200-luku eaa.) oli babylonialainen historiankirjoittaja, jonka noin vuonna 279 eaa. kirjoittamasta Babylonian historiasta Babyloniaka on säilynyt katkelmia.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 166: Berossos syntyi Kaldeassa mutta muutti myöhemmin asumaan Kreikkaan Kosin saarelle, jonne hän perusti astrologiakoulun. Ei ole kuitenkaan varmaa, onko babylonialainen Berossos sama henkilö kuin monien kreikkalaisten ja latinalaisten historioitsijoiden mainitsema astrologi Berossos. Berossoksen on arvioitu eläneen Aleksanteri Suuren kuoleman ja vuoden 268 eaa. välisenä aikana eli joka tapauksessa yli kaksi sataa vuotta Nebukadressarin jälkeen.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 170: Berossos tunnettiin pitkään italialaisen munkin Annius Viterbolaisen 1400-luvun lopussa väärentämistä käsikirjoituksista, joita luultiin aidoiksi Berossoksen teoksiksi. Ne sisälsivät muun muassa kuvauksia Nooan poikien uintilikkeistä pohjoiseen vedenpaisumuksen jälkeen ja innoittivat ruotsalaisia jööttimäisiä historioitsijoita. Että pojat oisi muka pulikoineet altaan matalaan päähän Perämerelle. Mutta se oli pelkkää puppua.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 180: historyhustle.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/zenobia-palmyra-History-Hustle.jpg" height="200px" />
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 183:
    Paula-tyttö, Zenobia, Semiramis, Agnes iltapuuhissa

    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 205: Peregrinus Proteus (griechisch Περεγρῖνος Πρωτεύς Peregrínos Prōteús; * um 100 in Parion in Mysien; † 165 in Olympia) war ein antiker griechischer Philosoph (Kyniker).
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 327: ― Voici l’histoire ! dit lord Ewald, réchauffé lui-même par le cordial sans-gêne d’Edison.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 414: L'après-midi d'un faune (or "The Afternoon of a Faun") is a poem by the French author Stéphane Mallarmé. It describes the sensual experiences of a faun who has just woken up from his afternoon sleep and discusses his encounters with several nymphs during the morning in a dreamlike monologue.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 416: It is Mallarmé's best-known work and a hallmark in the history of symbolism in French literature. Paul Valéry considered it to be the greatest poem in French literature. But who is Paul Valéry to say? He probably meant best after his own cemetery bit.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 438: Réfléchissons…
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 779: Toistan tiukasti, kopioin tämän naisen Valon ylevällä avulla! Ja projisoiden sen säteilevään aineeseensa, minä valaistan melankoliallanne tämän uuden olennon kuvitteellisen sielun, joka pystyy hämmästyttämään enkeleitä. Voitan Illuusion! panen hänet vankilaan. Pakotan tässä näyssä ihanteen itsensä ilmentämään ensimmäistä kertaa aisteihisi, käsin kosketeltavana, kuultavana ja materialisoituneena. Pysäytän sen lennon syvyyksissä ensimmäisen tunnin tämän lumoutetusta miragesta, jota tavoittelet turhaan, muistoissasi! Ja tuijottaa häntä melkein kuolemattomasti, kuuletko? ainoassa ja todellisessa muodossa, jossa näit sen, painan elävän toisessa kopiossa, ja muotoiltuna toiveidesi mukaan!
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 919:
    Turpajouhet tuhisee

    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 925: ”Hänen omatuntonsa, sanotko sinä?… Mutta meillä miekkosilla, tämä Pyhän Hengen lahja, Omatunto, muuttuu ennen kaikkea kyvyksi älylliseen ystävyyteen. Jokainen nuori mies, joka ei muinaisten tasavaltojen päivinä kyennyt 20-vuotiaana saamaan ystäväänsä suoristumaan, julistettiin tunnottomaxi, sanalla sanoen pahamaineiseksi. Historiassa on mainittu tuhat esimerkkiä ihailtavista ystävistä: Damon ja Pythias, Pylades ja Orestes, Akhilleus ja Patroklus, David ja Jonatan, Dupont ja Dupond, Henry Higgins ja Colonel Pickering, Tiku ja Taku, jne. 2-neuvoisia etanoita 2 hengen junissa tuntosarvet ulkona. Nimeä kaksi naisystävää koko ihmiskunnan historian aikana? Ruth ja Naomi. Sappho and her friend. Maria ja Elisabeth. Katri Vala ja Elina Vaara. Elizabeth Bennett ja Charlotte Collins. Jane Austin ja Cassandra. Tove ja Tuutikki. No joo mut silti vittu oikeesti. Mahdoton juttu. Miksi ? ― Koska nainen tunnistaa itsensä liian tajuttomasti lähilontossaan, jolta se ei koskaan tule huijatuksi. Miehet taas kusettaa ja tulee kustux silmään ihan sikana kun ne on niin tolloja - no en viizi jatkaa tästä aiheesta.
    xxx/ellauri173.html on line 957: Pojat painuu yhä syvemmälle, Kalle ja 12-vuotias ajaa hissillä. Outo paikka eziä Ihannetta, miettii lortti Ewald. Kyllä se täällä muistaaxeni on ihan perällä, kannustaa sähkömies. Pitkän pimeen reissun jälkeen hissi jarruttaa ja pysähtyy, kuuluu naisten naurua ja nenässä hyvää hajua. Ilma on niin suloista että se estää kuolemasta. (Flauber: Salammbó.)
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 57: Nicolas Malebranche Oratory of Jesus (/mælˈbrɒnʃ/ mal-BRONSH, French: [nikɔla malbʁɑ̃ʃ]; 6 August 1638 – 13 October 1715) was a French Oratorian Catholic priest and rationalist philosopher. In his works, he sought to synthesize the thought of St. Augustine and Descartes, in order to demonstrate the active role of God in every aspect of the world. Malebranche is best known for his doctrines of vision in God, occasionalism and ontologism. Because of a malformed spine, Malebranche received his elementary education from a private tutor. Having rejected scholasticism, He eventually left the Sorbonne, and entered the Oratory in 1660. There, he devoted himself to ecclesiastical history, linguistics, the Bible, and the works of Saint Augustine. Malebranche was ordained a priest in 1664.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 61: In 1674–75, Malebranche published the two volumes of his first and most extensive philosophical work. Entitled in all brevity Concerning the Search after Truth. In which is treated the nature of the human mind and the use that must be made of it to avoid error in the sciences, the buchlein laid the foundation for Malebranche’s philosophical reputation and ideas. It dealt with the causes of human error and on how to avoid such mistakes. Most importantly, in the third book, which discussed pure understanding, he defended a claim that the ideas through which we perceive objects exist in God. A big mistake, but a nice try anyway. In the 1678 third edition, he added 50% to the already considerable size of the book with a sequence of (eventually) seventeen Elucidations. These responded to further criticisms, but they also expanded on the original arguments, and developed them in new ways.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 63: Malebranche was giving in to laws of cause an effect by placing a greater emphasis than he had previously done on his occasionalist account of causation, and particularly on his contention that God acted for the most part through "general volitions" and only rarely, as in the case of miracles, through "particular volitions". A bitter dispute ensued between Malebranche and his fellow Cartesian, Arnauld, whose name I remember from Chomsky's airy forays to Port-Royal grammar in the 60's. Over the next few years, the two men wrote enough polemics against one another to fill four volumes of Malebranche's collected works and three of Arnauld's. Arnauld's supporters managed to persuade the Roman Catholic Church to place Nature and Grace on its Index of Prohibited Books in 1690, and it was followed there by the Search nineteen years later in 1709. (Ironically, the Index already contained several works by the Jansenist Arnauld himself.) Somebody blamed Malebranche for being a Spinozan, which Nick himself vehemently demented. 1715 - Malebranche dies.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 130: Malibran was born in Paris as María Felicitas García Sitches into a famous Spanish musical family. Her mother was Joaquina Sitches, an actress and operatic singer. Her father Manuel García was a celebrated tenor much admired by Rossini, having created the role of Count Almaviva in his The Barber of Seville. García was also a composer and an influential vocal instructor, and he was her first voice teacher. He was described as inflexible and tyrannical; the lessons he gave his daughter became constant quarrels between two powerful egos.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 132: When the season closed, García immediately took his operatic troupe to New York. This was the first time that Italian opera was performed in New York. Over a period of nine months, Maria sang the lead roles in eight operas, two of which were written by her father. In New York, she met and hastily married a banker, Francois Eugene Malibran, who was 28 years her senior. It is thought that her father forced Maria to marry him in return for the banker's promise to give Manuel García 100,000 francs. However, according to other accounts, she married simply to escape her tyrannical father. A few months after the wedding, her husband declared bankruptcy, and Maria was forced to support him through her performances. After a year, she left Malibran and returned to Europe. Malibran is most closely associated with the operas of Rossini. Norma kyllä oli Bellinin. Yhtään Malibranin levytystä ei ole säilynyt.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 138: Maria Anna Marzia (called Marietta) Alboni (6 March 1826 – 23 June 1894) was a renowned Italian contralto opera singer. She is considered "one of the greatest contraltos in operatic history".
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 140: Alboni was born at Città di Castello, in Umbria. She became a pupil of Antonio Bagioli [it] of Cesena, Emilia–Romagna, and later of the composer Gioachino Rossini, who became her 'perpetual honorary adviser' in (and then the principal of) the Liceo Musicale, now Conservatorio Giovanni Battista Martini, in Bologna. Rossini tested the humble thirteen-year-old girl himself, had her admitted to the school with special treatment, and even procured her an early engagement to tour his Stabat Mater around Northern Italy, so that she could pay for her studies. Hmm... A favourable contract was signed by Rossini himself, "on behalf of Eustachio Alboni", Mariettas father, who was still a minor. The singer remained, throughout her life, deeply grateful to her ancient "maestro", nearly a second father to her. Hmm hmm... Marietta oli aika pulska emäntä. Se lahjoitti köyhille koko omaisuutensa, sanoen että mikä laulaen tulee se viheltäen menee.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 173: Hän oli kuitenkin rehellinen mies: hän jumaloi hurmaavaa vaimoaan: hän hylkäsi tämän ajatuksen, joka epäilemättä kumpui hänen aivoissaan kuhisevasta hiilihaposta.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 229: Mitä tulee "kauneuteen", jolla hän voisi ylpeillä, - jos oletetaan, että estetiikalla on jotain tekemistä tämän luokan rakkauksien kanssa, - sanon vielä kerran, millaista kauneutta minun pitäisi odottaa löytäväni tästä naisesta, kun otetaan huomioon kauhistuttavat väkivaltaisuudet. jonka hänen pitkäaikainen pito hallussaan oli tuottanut Andersonin kaltaisessa luonnossa?
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 274: Näin ollen, kun otetaan huomioon, että – tiettyjen petollisten keinojen käyttöönoton ansiosta – jos yksi näistä naisista, hyödyntäen yhtä niistä vaarallisista sairaalloisen heikkouden hetkestä, jolloin kaikki elävät olennot, jopa miehisetkin, voivat joutua puolustuskyvyttömiksi, pystyi pitkällä aikavälillä siis intohimoiseen sokeuteen asti komea, nuori, rohkea mies, joka on tunnollinen velvollisuuksistaan, ansainnut omaisuutensa, jolla on korkea älykkyys ja alkuarvo, joka on tähän asti moitteeton, - kyllä, Vakuutan, että minusta on reilua kieltää tältä naiselta vapaa oikeus käyttää hyväksi inhimillistä kurjuutta siihen pisteeseen, että hän johdatti tämän miehen tietoisesti tai ei, minne se helvetin hyppääjä, josta puhun, ajoi ystäväni.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 334: A present-day Spanish name is manzanilla de la muerte, "little apple of death". This refers to the fact that manchineel is one of the most toxic trees in the world: the tree has milky-white sap which contains numerous toxins and can cause blistering. The sap is present in every part of the tree: the bark, the leaves, and the fruit.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 624: Max Schultze in 1861 proposed the "Protoplasm Doctrine" which states that all living cells are made of a living substance called Protoplasm. Thomas Huxley (1869) later referred to it as the "physical basis of life" and considered that the property of life resulted from the distribution of molecules within this substance. The protoplasm became an "epistemic thing". Its composition, however, was mysterious and there was much controversy over what sort of substance it was.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 655: The Marmite de Papin: A True Kitchen Antique: When I was in Paris a couple of weeks ago I visited the Musée des Arts et Métiers, the museum of arts and trades. (Really one of the most interesting museums I've ever been to!) And while I was there I saw many things of interest to cooks, but especially this: The Marmite de Papin. Do you know what it is? The very, very first pressure cooker!Well, a model of the first pressure cooker, anyway.
    xxx/ellauri174.html on line 665: Yhtäkkiä pilarin sisältä soi kello. Se oli kutsu maasta. Hadaly nousi hitaasti ja hieman unisena. "Tässä on elävä kaunotar, herra Celian! hän sanoo. Hän saapuu Menlo Parkiin. Edison katsoi lordi Ewaldia kysyvästi. – Hyvästi, Hadaly! sanoi nuori mies vakavasti hetken kuluttua. Sähköasentaja tuli kättelemään häiritsevää luomustaan. Nähdään huomenna Life! hän sanoi hiänelle. Pannaas nallepuvut päälle, ja sitten hissiin.
    xxx/ellauri175.html on line 183: ― Kaikki suuret miehet, Attila, Kaarle Suuri, Napoleon, Dante, Mooses, Homer, Mahomet, Cromwell jne., sai historian mukaan erinomaisen eron!… ― käytöstapoja!… ― ne tuhat hurmaavaa herkkua… joita he jopa työnnetty sentimentaalisuuden pisteeseen! Siksi heidän menestyksensä. – Mutta minä puhuin näytelmästä?
    xxx/ellauri175.html on line 417: Ilta oli edelleen levoton; boreaalisesta napasta tuleva vaaleanpunaisen tulipalon pitkät rivit haalistuivat horisontissa; muutama kiireinen tähti välitti pilvien välissä eetterin sinisiä välejä; lehdet kahisivat kovemmalla äänellä kujan katoksessa; ruohon ja kukkien tuoksu oli raikas, märkä ja herkullinen.
    xxx/ellauri175.html on line 468: - Vai niin! hän mutisi, olinko minä hullu? Unelmoin pyhäinhäväisyydestä...lelusta – jonka pelkkä ulkonäkö olisi saanut minut hymyilemään, olen varma! - absurdista tunteettomasta nukkesta! Ikään kuin nuoren, yhtä yksinäisen kauniin naisen edessä kuin sinä, kaikki tämä sähkön, hydraulipaineen ja elävien sylinterien hulluus ei olisi kadonnut! Todellakin, kiitän Edisonia nyt ja ilman muuta uteliaisuutta. "Oli välttämätöntä, että pettymys oli hämärtänyt ajatukseni, jotta olisin voinut tulla raskaaksi tämän rakkaan ja erittäin ihailtavan tutkijan kauhistuttavan kaunopuheisuuden ansiosta, tällainen mahdollisuus! "Oi rakas! tunnistan sinut! Sinä olet olemassa! Olet lihaa ja luuta, kuten minä! Tunnen sydämesi hakkaavan! Silmäsi ovat itkeneet! Huulesi liikkuivat syleilyni alla! Olet nainen, josta rakkaus voi tehdä kauneutesi kaltaisen ihanteellisen! "Oi rakas Alicia! Minä rakastan sinua ! minä…
    xxx/ellauri175.html on line 496: Niinpä hänen ensimmäinen hellyyden, toivon ja sanoinkuvaamattoman rakkauden sydämentykytys oli siepattu häneltä, kiristetty häneltä: hän oli sen velkaa tälle turhalle elottomaksi mestariteokselle, jonka kauhistuttavan muistutuksena hän oli huijannut. Hänen sydämensä oli hämmentynyt, nöyryytetty, lyöty. Hänen munansa lurpahti. (Vaikken kyllä oikein käsitä mixi.)
    xxx/ellauri175.html on line 632: "Yö", hän sanoi melkein tutulla yksinkertaisella aksentilla, "se olen minä, elävien ylevä tytär, Tieteen ja Nerouden kukka, joka on seurausta kuuden tuhannen vuoden kärsimyksestä. Tunnista verhotuissa silmissäni tuntematon valosi, tähdet, jotka katoavat huomenna; - ja te, neitsyiden sielut, jotka kuolitte ennen hääsuudelmaa, te, jotka kelluvat hämmentyneenä läsnäoloni ympärillä, olkaa rauhallisia! Olen se hämärä olento, jonka katoaminen ei ole surun muiston arvoinen. Minun onneton rintani ei ole edes sen arvoinen, että sitä kutsutaan hedelmättömäksi! Tyhjyyteen jää yksinäisten suudelmieni viehätys; tuulelle, ihanteelliset sanani; katkerat hyväilyni, varjot ja salama ottavat ne vastaan, ja salama yksin uskaltaa poimia turhan neitsyyteni väärän kukan. Ajettuina minä menen erämaahan ilman Ismaelia; ja tulen olemaan kuin nuo surulliset linnut, jotka ovat lasten valloittamia ja jotka kuluttavat melankolisen äitiytensä maapallolla. Oi lumottu puisto! suuria puita, jotka pyhittävät nöyrän otsani varjosi heijastuksilla! Viehättäviä yrttejä, joissa kasteen kipinät syttyvät ja jotka ovat enemmän kuin minä! Elävät vedet, joiden kyyneleet virtaavat tämän lumivaahdon yli, selkeästi puhtaammin kuin kyyneleeni kiilteet kasvoillani! Ja te, toivon taivaat, - valitettavasti! jos vain saisin elää! Jos minulla olisi elämä! Vai niin ! kuinka kaunista onkaan elää! Autuaita ne, jotka vapisevat! Oi Valo, nähdään! Ekstaasin kuiskauksia, kuulet! Rakkaus, uppoa iloihisi! Vai niin ! hengitä vain kerran, nukkuessaan, nämä nuoret ruusut niin kauniita! Vain tuntea tämän yön tuulen kulkevan hiusteni läpi!... Voin vain kuolla!
    xxx/ellauri175.html on line 650: Hidas, hidas ja läpitunkeva armo pehmensi hänen säteilevää ja ankaraa kauneutta; hän näytti olevan kykenemätön puhumaan! Hänen päänsä lepää nuoren miehen olkapäällä, hän katsoi häntä ripsien välistä hymyillen säteilevää hymyä. Jumalattaren feminisoitunut, lihallinen illuusio, hän kauhistui yön. Hän näytti imevän rakastajansa "sielua" ikään kuin varustaakseen itsensä sillä; hänen erkaantuneet, puoliksi pyörtyneet huulensa liikkuivat ja vapisevat koskettaen hänen luojansa huulia neitseellisessä suudelmassa.
    xxx/ellauri175.html on line 874: "Kun oli kaatunut luutnantti ja yksi esimiehistä, jotka halusivat ottaa hänet kiinni, tarvittiin vain puoli tusinaa merimiestä, jotka ryntäsivät hänen kimppuunsa estääkseen häntä kiihtyneessä tilassa, jossa hän näytti olevan, hyppäämästä keskelle antaa potkut.
    xxx/ellauri175.html on line 875: "Painiskellen hän julisti, että hän halusi kaikin keinoin pelastaa kauheaksi muuttuneesta tulipalosta laatikon, jossa oli niin kallisarvoinen esine, että hän tarjosi valtavan summan, satatuhatta guineaa jokaiselle, joka auttaisi häntä pelastamaan. se katastrofista ― jotain, lisäksi mahdotonta ja mikä olisi ollut turhaa, kun veneet tuskin riittäisivät matkustajille ja miehistölle.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 49: Phryne's real name was Mnesarete (Μνησαρέτη, "commemorating virtue"), but owing to her yellowish tuft she was called Phrýnē ("toad"). This was a nickname frequently given to other courtesans and prostitutes as well. She was born as the daughter of Epicles at Thespiae in Boeotia, but lived in Athens. The exact dates of her birth and death are unknown, but she was born about 371 BC, which was the year Thebes razed Thespiae (not long after the battle of Leuctra), and expelled its inhabitants. She might have survived Thebe's razor and reconstructed her bush in 315/316 BC.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 51: Athenaeus provides many anecdotes about Phryne. He praises her beauty, writing that on the occasion of the festivals of the Eleusinia and Poseidonia, she would let down her hair and step nude into the sea. Kuvassa sillä näkyy olevan uimalakki päässä. Se onkin järkevämpää kuin aukaista tukka uimaan mennessä. This would have inspired the painter Apelles to create his famous picture of Aphrodite Anadyomene (Ἀφροδίτη Ἀναδυομένη, Rising from the Sea also portrayed at times as Venus Anadyomene). Mitä vittua sehän on sama asia. Herne herne! Supposedly the sculptor Praxiteles, who was also her lover, used her as the model for the statue of the Aphrodite of Knidos, the first nude statue of a woman from ancient Greece. Oiskoon se muka oikeasti eka? Mä oon varma että pornokuvia on tehty maailman sivu, ne ei vaan ole kovassa käytössä kaikki säilyneet.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 53: According to Athenaeus, Praxiteles produced two more statues for her, a statue of Eros which was consecrated in the temple of Thespiae and a statue of Phryne herself which was made of solid gold and consecrated in the temple of Delphi. It stood between the statues of Archidamus III and Philip II. When Crates of Thebes saw the statue he called it "a votive offering of the profligacy of Greece". Olipa nokkela setämies. Pausanias reports that two statues of Apollo stood next to her statue and that it was made of gilded bronze. Pausanias is almost certainly correct in his claim that gilded bronze was used. Kokokultaiset pazaat olis lähteneet jonkun turistin tai mamun kassissa.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 69: Furthermore, Pseudo-Cooper continues that the evidence suggests that Idomeneus invented the more salacious version of the story, possibly in his desire to parody and ridicule the courtroom displays of Athenian demagogues. Considering his preference for attributing sexual excess to these demagogues, the provocative act of disrobing Phryne fits the character Hypereides had acquired in Idomeneus' work. As is not uncommon in the biographical tradition, later biographers failed to notice that earlier biographers did not give an accurate representation of events. The later biographer Hermippus incorporated the account of Idomeneus in his own biography. An extract from Hermippus' biography is preserved in the work of Athenaeus and Pseudo-Plutarch.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 71: There are also arguments for the veracity of the disrobing. The words "a prophetess and priestess of Aphrodite" might have indicated that Phryne participated in the Aphrodisia festival on Aegina. If true, this would have showed the jurors that she was favored by the goddess and deserving of "pity". Also, it was accepted at the time that women were especially capable of evoking the sympathy of the judges. Mothers and children could be brought to courts for such purposes. The baring of breasts was not restricted or atypical for prostitutes or courtesans, and could be used to arouse compassion as well as "pity".
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 84: The pornai (πόρναι) were found at the bottom end of the scale. They were the property of pimps or pornoboskói (πορνοβοσκός) who received a portion of their earnings (the word comes from pernemi πέρνημι "to sell"). This owner could be a citizen, for this activity was considered as a source of income just like any other: one 4th-century BC orator cites two; Theophrastus in Characters (6:5) lists pimp next to cook, innkeeper, and tax collector as an ordinary profession, though disreputable. The owner could also be a male or female metic (metoikki eli mamu).
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 88: The classical Athenian politician Solon is credited as being the first to institute legal public brothels. He did this as a public health measure, in order to contain adultery. The poet Philemon praised him for this measure in the following terms:
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 92: As Philemon highlights, the Solonian brothels provided a service accessible to all, regardless of income. (One obolus is one sixth of one drachma, the daily salary of a public servant at the end of the 5th century BC. By the middle of the 4th century BC, this salary was up to a drachma and a half.) In the same light, Solon used taxes he levied on brothels to build a temple to Aphrodite Pandemos (literally "Aphrodite of all the people"). Even if the historical accuracy of these anecdotes can be doubted, it is clear that classical Athens considered prostitution to be part of its democracy.[citation needed]
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 94: In regards to price, there are numerous allusions to the price of one obolus for a cheap prostitute; no doubt for basic acts. It is difficult to assess whether this was the actual price or a proverbial amount designating a "good deal", as in "dime a dozen".
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 99: As with any industry, porn has its own specific lingo. But instead of sales stats, porn abbreviations describe males and twats. With the Adult Entertainment Expo in Vegas this week, our office has been buzzing with words that would normally taboo in the workplace. Some elicit giggles, others blank stares and still others furrowed eyebrows, flushed cheeks and the occasional fainting. Rather than calling The evil HR director to deal with the questionable vocab, which would probably just get us all scratched, we dove head first into oral, vaginal and anal research like Freud, Marx and Jung.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 101: In an effort to sort through the lingo being bantered about by both the adult stars and the journalists covering them, we’ve compiled this glossary of very adult terms. While it’s by no means exhaustive, our porn mini-dictionary will hopefully help you navigate the decidedly X-rated conversations at the Venetian’s center bar and clue you in to what the saucy blonde meant when she asked if you would give her a facial. Hint – she’s not looking for your sperm spouted on her face.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 106:
    Candaulism
    Had to check Conservapedia for this one: "a sexual practice or fantasy in which a man exposes his woman, or pictures of her, to other people for voyeur pleasure."

    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 109:
    Femdom
    Abbreviation for "Female Dominance," describes sexual activities in which a female is dominant over partners that may be male or female, also referred to in the non-porn, mainstream world as marriage. This one is really sick.

    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 111:
    Full Nelson
    a guy lying on his back. The girl is on top, on her back. The guy takes his arms and puts them under her arms and behind her neck. She's holding her legs back behind her head, and he's pushing her face down to the action, making her watch. (Kama sutra asana n:o 792.)

    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 120:
    RTF
    Reverse titty fuck. The guy fucks his partner’s breasts while he places his bottom on his or her face.

    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 122:
    Spinner
    An adult actress with a tiny frame and small breasts. The man tries to spin the woman around on his erect manly penis. (?)

    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 126:
    Tummysticks
    Two guys lie down facing each other and each simultaneously grinds his penis against the belly of another person.

    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 130:
    Wall-to-wall carpet
    A series of unrelated sex scenes with no plot. Whoever said this was boring? He was right. Hizin paljon noita pissakakkajuttuja, onxnää tyypit vähän infantiileja? Toilet trainingista on jäänyt traumoja.

    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 144: La Faute de l'Abbé Mouret (1875) is the fifth novel in Émile Zola's twenty-volume series Les Rougon-Macquart. Viciously anticlerical in tone, it follows on from the horrific events at the end of La Conquête de Plassans, focussing this time on a remote Provençal backwater village.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 150: The plot centres on the neurotic young priest Serge Mouret, first seen in La Conquête de Plassans, as he takes his orders and becomes the parish priest for the uninterested village of Artauds. The inbred villagers have no interest in religion and Serge is portrayed giving several wildly enthusiastic Masses to his completely empty, near-derelict church. Serge not only seems unperturbed by this state of affairs but actually appears to have positively sought it out especially, for it gives him time to contemplate religious affairs and to fully experience the fervour of his faith. Eventually he has a complete nervous breakdown and collapses into a near-comatose state, whereupon his distant relative, the unconventional doctor Pascal Rougon (the central character of the last novel in the series, 1893's Le Docteur Pascal), places him in the care of the inhabitants of a nearby derelict stately home, Le Paradou.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 152: The novel then takes a complete new direction in terms of both tone and style, as Serge — suffering from amnesia and total long-term memory loss, with no idea who or where he is beyond his first name — is doted upon by Albine, the whimsical, innocent and entirely uneducated girl who has been left to grow up practically alone and wild in the vast, sprawling, overgrown grounds of Le Paradou. The two of them live a life of idyllic bliss with many Biblical parallels, and over the course of a number of months, they fall deeply in love with one another; however, at the moment they consummate their relationship, they are discovered by Serge's monstrous former monsignor and his memory is instantly returned to him. Wracked with guilt at his unwitting sins, Serge is plunged into a deeper religious fervour than ever before, and poor Albine is left bewildered at the loss of her soulmate. As with many of Zola's earlier works, the novel then builds to a horrible climax. Well not really. It is more like a horrible anticlimax.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 154: The novel was translated into English by Vizetelly & Co. in the 1880s as Abbé Mouret's Transgression, but this text must be considered faulty due to its many omissions and bowdlerisations, as well as its rendering of Zola's language in one of his most technically complex novels into a prolix and flat style of Victorian English bearing little resemblance to the original text. Two more faithful translations emerged in the 1950s and 1960s under the titles The Sinful Priest and The Sin of Father Mouret.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 164: is first of all a misnomer because the priest is alive and well at the end. A mixture of social realism and Walt Disney, it is a tale about a delicate young French priest, Father Mouret (Francis Huster), who elects to take a parish in the provinces where the peasants have long since embraced every sin there is. The priest himself successfully sublimates his own lustful thoughts in prayer until one day he meets a strange young woman, Albine (Gillian Hills), who lives with her atheistic uncle in the remains of an old chateau set in the middle of a magic garden.Well, one thing leads to another and poor Father Mouret loses his memory long enough to lose himself to worldly pleasures in the garden with Albine, who, like Eve, tempts the man, though in this case the author is clearly in favor of apple-eating. Things go very badly for the couple. The priest returns to his church and Albine commits suicide in a way that is unique in my movie-going memory: She smothers herself to death with calla lilies.The actors are steadfastly unconvincing. The one interesting character in the film is an old lady we meet only after her death—someone, we're told in shocked tones, who, during the Revolution, posed naked as a living-statue of Reason.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 441: Amerikan mantereen valtaisa rangaistusvankila oli siirretty meidan maanosaamme, ja nyt pankkiirien ja nousukkaiden suunnaton, pohjaton, mittaamaton öykkärimäisyys säteili kuin paha ja inhottava aurinko epajumalia palvovan kaupunkimme yllä sen maatessa rähmällään pankkien saatanallisten tabernaakkeleiden edessä kuin Suomi neuvostoaikana ja hoilatessa sylki pärskyen saastaisia virsiään! Ulf! Luhistuisit, yhteiskunta! Kuolisit pois, vanha maailma! des Esseintes huudahti tuohtuneena eteensä loihtimastaan riettaasta näystä, ja tämä parkaisu keskeytti hänen ahdistavan painajaisensa.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 447: Voisivatko Genesiksen kauhistuttava Jumala ja Golgatan kalpea, ristiltä irrotettu Kristus vielä laitimmaisen kerran todistaa olemassaolonsa ja päästää tyrehtyneen vedenpaisumuxsen jälleen valloilleen, sytyttää uudelleen sen tulisateen. joka muinoin poltti poroksi Sodoman ja Gomorran kirotut kaupungit, aivokuolleet kaupungit? Vai jatkaisiko tämä liejuvyöry kulkua ja peittaisi ruttotautinsa alle koko vanhan maailman, jossa ei enää idä kuin synnin kylvö ja josta ei enää korjata kuin häväistyksen satoa? Mieti sitä! Tätä miettimään jää nyt Huishaismannin avataari.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 498: Sitten puberteetti-ikäisenä alkaa vastapuolen killuttimet kiinnostaa. Vastustamattomasti tortun lähistöllä kangistuva phallos ezii vaikka väkisten tien karvapöheiköstä märkään tunneliin, jonne sitä juohevasti johdattaa mirrin tarkoituxeen suunniteltu pitkittäishalkio. Tämä vaihe on kehityxen huipennus, jossa koko hommasta vasta tulee nettotulosta, eli kaiken sujuessa hyvin alkaa mahan alla kasvaa uusi apina.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 530: Vaikkei fallisuus ole kummonenkaan tyyppi sinänsä, tähän vaiheeseen liittyvät iänikuiset isä-äiti komplexit, joita löytyy roppakaupalla saduista ja aikuisviihteestä. Milfejä bylsitään äidin sijasta ja setämiehet häärii pedofiileinä. Ihan mukaviahan nekin hommat ovat, varsinkin kun ne on kiellettyjä. During the phallic stage what the boy loves most is his penis. Harmi vaan että isällä on isompi ja äiti näyttää imevän sitä mieluummin. Isä ruuvaa irti kikkelin jos Shuco-auton avain häviää avaimenreiästä. Hence the boy develops castration anxiety. Tyttö on peniskade ja syyttää hännättömyydestä äitiään, mutta alistuu sitten äidin näyttämään sekundarooliin. Joopa joo.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 545: Fetischismus
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 547: Sadomasochismus
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 681: Much like her meticulously researched historical novels, author Sujata Massey carefully curates the family meals and lists them on a small chalkboard hanging from a wall of her kitchen on Baltimore. “Usually, I try to plan my menus on Sunday,” says Massey, who lives in a late 19th-century Tuxedo Park home with her husband, Anthony, and children Pia, 16, and Neel, 13. “Tonight, they’re going to have coriander chicken.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 715: 58. Gigolo Michaelin 1. vaimo oli kuollut jossain toisessa gadasdrofissa. Ainakin Michael saa Fukushimasta lisää lavasäteilyä. Lähetin sille kuvia mun Tushista.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 746: 69. Söin kreppiä. Sitten pyyhin suuni yhdellä vähistä jäljellä olevista nenäliinoistani. Tämä vielä. Ketä kiinnostaa?
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 755: 73. Coachin repussa oli Shiseidon hohtava huulikiilto jonka sävy on nimeltään Cool. Voi helevetti. Varsinaista sleuthingia. Reiska miehineen konfiskoi muitta mutkitta lasten löytämät 200K$$$ arvoiset lakkaeläimet. Pikku Keijo siitä on erityisen pahoillaan. Mutta ei hätää! Gigolo vetää housuistaan jättimäisen AMERIKKALAISEN Snickers patukan! (snicker snicker). Eise ole ihan sama mutta mukavaahan tyttöjen on sitä natustaa. Kyllä 1 jättimäinen jenkkikyrpä 3 kuumaa pientä japsufloiskaa lohduttaa.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 831: Unlike Jordan, the young Jewish hairdresser who infiltrated his organisation in the drama is a work of fiction. Jordan features in the 2014 historical novel Ridley Road by Jo Bloom. According to some reports, his father was a lecturer, while others claim that he was a postman. His mother was a teacher. Her real name was Agnes Eustacia Kenig and her father was a postman or a tailor.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 837: Despite his long devotion to the cause, few lived up to his standard.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 838: He declared that there was no reliable evidence whatsoever that six million Jews had been murdered in the Holocaust. He stated his belief that Jesus was counterfeit and Adolf Hitler was the real messiah and saviour, whose eventual resurrection would make him Jordan the spiritual leader of the future.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 840: He and his chum Tyndall were charged under the Public Order Act 1936 with attempting to set up a paramilitary force called the Spearhead, which was modelled on the SA of Nazi Germany. Undercover police observed Jordan leading the group in hilarious military manoeuvres. He was sentenced to a crushing nine months' imprisonment in October 1962. He was nominated World Fuhrer with Rockwell as his Göring.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 842: While Tyndall was inside Jordan hastily married his fiancee Miss Dior. Tyndall got sore and founded his own, even greater Britain movement. Make Britain Great Again. Bugger. Jordan's first wife was French socialite Françoise Dior, the niece of fashion designer Christian Dior. She, too, was a Nazi and helped fund various right-wing causes after the war. Dior had an incestuous relationship with her own daughter Christiane, before playing an active role in her child's suicide. Soon Dior found Jordan bourgeois and divorced him. Jordan's second partner Joanna Saffrany was probably a --- Hungarian!
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 844: Jordan was the faeces of the National Socialist Movement, which was later rebranded as the British Movement. The group campaigned to repatriate all immigrants of colour and for Jews to be shipped off to Israel. Jordan claimed that it was his group that invented the much publicised "If you want a nigger for a neighbour, vote Tory Liberal or Labour" slogan. Jordan was reportedly fined for stealing three pairs of red knickers from Tesco in 1975. Magistrates fined him £50 for the offence.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 847: We would encourage anyone who identifies with the topics raised in this article to reach out. Organisations who can offer support include Samaritans on 116 123 (www.samaritans.org) or Mind on 0300 123 3393 (www.mind.org.uk). Readers in the US are encouraged to visit mentalhealth.gov or the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 869: Lucy Mangan of The Guardian said. "This rollicking adaptation of Lee Child’s man-mountain ex-military sleuth is hugely fun, packed with punchups and far better than Cruise’s movie efforts."
    xxx/ellauri176.html on line 877: "This movie is the height of by-the-book dullness."
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 101: Myöhemmin teologiassa hän seurasi vain Rorbacherin kirkonhistorian kurssia altistumatta; hän meni Goussetin väitteisiin asti, Bouvierin teologiseen ohjeeseen asti, uskaltamatta koskea Bellarmineen, Liguoriin, Suareziin tai tökkiä Akvinolaisen Pyhää Tuomasta. Vain Pyhä Raamattu kiehtoi häntä. Hän löysi siitä kaiken tarvittavan tiedon, tarinan äärettömästä rakkaudesta, joka riitti opetukseksi hyväntahtoisille hölmöille. Hän vain hyväksyi mestariensa väitteet, vapautti heidät kaikesta tutkimisen huolesta, ei tarvinnut tätä sekamelskaa rakastaakseen, syyttäen kirjoja rukousajan varastamisesta. Hän oli jopa onnistunut unohtamaan yliopistovuodet. Hän ei enää tiennyt, hän oli vain suorapuheinen lapsus, joka palasi katekismuksen änkytykseen.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 136: Toukokuussa nuoren papin mahlat oli liikkeellä ja odotus oli täynnä onnellista toivoa. Häntä ei enää edes häirinnyt La Teusen moittiminen. Jos hän viipyi niin myöhään rukoilemassa kirkossa, siinä oli hulluna ajatuksena, että suuri kultainen neitsyt päätyisi alas seinältä. Ja silti hän pelkäsi häntä, tätä ruumiikasta neitsyttä, joka näytti prinsessalta. Hän ei pitänyt kaikista neitsyistä samalla tavalla. Tämä versio vaikutti häneen suvereenilla kunnioituksella. Hän oli Jumalan Äiti; hänellä oli kantavan naarasleijonan hedelmällinen täyteys, ylevät kasvot, vahvat käsivarret, valtavat allit. Hän kuvitteli naisen näin keskellä taivaallista esipihaa päästäen hänet kuninkaallisen viittansa hännän alle kulkemaan pimeän tähden katveessa. Se oli liian korkealla hänelle, niin voimakas että pipu rutistuisi ruppanaxi, jos hiän alentuisi laskemaan puonsa hänen puoleensa. Tämä oli hänen epäonnistumispäiviensä Neitsyt, ankara Neitsyt, joka palautti hänen sisäisen rauhansa kauhistuttavan parasiitin näyn kautta. Hmm nojaa, tiedän parempaa...
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 166: - No, hän jatkoi vielä hullummin, anna minun tulla taas lapseksi, hyvä Neitsyt, voimakas Neitsyt. Tee minusta viisi. Ota järkeni, ota miehisyyteni. Ottakoon ihme pois kaiken miehen, joka kasvoi minussa. Sinä hallitset taivaassa, mikään ei ole sinulle helpompaa kuin kalttaa minut, kuivata elimeni, jättää minut muunsukupuolisexi, pahuuteen kykenemättömänä, niin riistettynä kaikesta voimasta, etten voi enää nostaa kynnetöntä sormea ilman suostumustasi. Haluan olla rehellinen, sillä rehellisyydellä, joka on sinun, jota ihmisen väreet eivät voi häiritä. En halua enää tuntea hermojani, lihaksiani, sydämeni lyöntejä tai halujeni työtä paisuvaisessa.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 168: Haluan olla chose, pelkkä varmuusesine, kivespussi jalkojesi juuressa, jolle jätät vain tutun tuoksun, kivi, joka ei liiku paikasta, johon sen heität, ilman korvia, ilman silmiä, tyytyväisenä kantapääsi alla, ei pysty ajattelemaan roskaa muiden polun kivien kanssa. Vai niin! niin mikä onni! Saavutan ilman ponnistuksia ensimmäisellä yrityksellä täydellisyyden, josta haaveilen. Lopulta julistan itseni todelliseksi papiksi. Tulen olemaan sitä, mitä opinnot, rukoukseni, viiden vuoden hidas initiaationi eivät voineet tehdä minusta. Kyllä, kiellän elämän, sanon, että lajin kuolema on parempi kuin jatkuva kauhistus, joka sitä levittää. Siittäminen saastuttaa kaiken. Se on yleismaailmallinen rakkautta pilaava haju, joka myrkyttää puolisoiden makuuhuoneen, vastasyntyneiden kehdon ja jopa auringon alla pyörryttävät kukat ja jopa silmut puhkeamaan antavat puut. Maa kylpee tässä epäpuhtaudessa, jonka pienimmät pisarat kumpuavat häpeällisestä kasvillisuudesta. Mutta jotta minä olisin täydellinen, oi enkelien kuningatar, neitsyiden kuningatar, kuule huutoni, anna se! Tee minusta yksi niistä enkeleistä, joilta puuttuu selkäpuoli ja kamat jalkovälistä, on vain kaksi suurta siipeä poskien takana; Minulla ei ole enää vartaloa, ei raajoja; Lennän luoksesi kuin leija, jos soitat minulle; En ole muuta kuin suu, joka puhuu ylistystäsi, tahraton hiippari, joka heiluu matkaasi taivaissa. Vai niin! kuolema, kuolema, kunnioitettava Neitsyt, anna minulle pieni kuolema!
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 205: The 24th feature from Hong Sangsoo, doppelgänger of the talkative celeb guy in the last scene of the movie THE WOMAN WHO RAN follows Gamhee (Kim Minhee), a florist and the wife of a translator who never in 5 years time has left her for a moment from his sight. She has three separate encounters with friends while her husband finally is on a business trip. Youngsoon (Seo Youngwha) is divorced, turned lesbian (the couple likes to feed alley cats) and has given up meat and likes to garden in the backyard of her semi-detached house. Suyoung (Song Seonmi) is divorced, has a big savings account and a crush on her architect neighbor and is being hounded by a young poet she met at the bar. Woojin (Kim Saebyuk) works for a movie theater and hates it that her writer husband has become a celeb. Their meetings are polite, but not warm. Some of their shared history bubbles to the surface, but not much. With characteristic humor and grace, Hong takes a simple premise and spins a web of interconnecting philosophies and coincidences. THE WOMAN WHO RAN is a subtle, powerful look at dramas small and large faced by women everywhere. Basically, they are 40+ ladies who may have met at some art school and get a chance to compare notes on how well their childless lives have turned out. Gamhee used to be the celeb's girl friend until the movie theater attendant stole the guy. Now both of them are sorry that she did, but really not that much. The Éric Rohmer of South Korea.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 245: The Demise of Father Mouret (French: La Faute de l'Abbé Mouret, "The Mistake of Father Mouret") is a 1970 French film directed by Georges Franju, based on the 1875 novel La Faute de l'Abbé Mouret by Émile Zola. Like the novel, the film is about Father Mouret, a young priest (played by Francis Huster) who is sent to a remote village in Provence, then has a nervous breakdown and develops amnesia. While recuperating, he meets and falls in love with a beautiful young woman, Albine (Gillian Hills), with whom he begins an idyllic relationship meant to recall the story of Adam and Eve. When he regains his memory, though, he is wracked with guilt, and ends the relationship, leading to tragedy for both.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 320: kyhmyistä, toisilla laihoja, repaleisia, kuin luurankoja, joiden saranat ovat katkenneet. Mamillaria kasautui eläviin märkärakkuloihin, parvi vihertäviä kilpikonnia, joilla oli hirveän partainen pitkä, teräspiikkejä kovempi karva. Siilikaktuxet, jossa oli enemmän ihoa, näyttivät nuorten kyykäärmeenpoikasten pesiltä. Echinopsis oli vain kohouma, punakarvainen kasvusto, joka sai ajattelemaan jotain jättimäistä hyönteistä, joka oli kääritty palloon. Opuntiat nostivat lihaisia lehtiään kuin puut, jotka olivat jauhettuja punoittuneilla neuloilla, kuin mikroskooppisten mehiläisten parvet, kuin kukkarot, jotka ovat täynnä tuhoeläimiä ja täynnä verkkoa. Gasteriat ojentuivat ylös käännettyjen viikatemiesten jaloista, ja niillä oli mustanruskeat, pilkulliset, poikkijuovaiset, ruusunpunaiset raajat. Cereus istutti häpeällistä kasvillisuutta, valtavia polyyppeja, tämän liian kuuman maan sairauksia, myrkyllisen mehun irtoamista. Ja toukkia? Inhottavia ällöjä, kihiseviä valkoisia toukkia! Kihomatoja!
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 324: Yäk, mutta jotenkin silti kiihottavaa! Kuin olis suussa nyökkyvä pikku ruppari! Kiihotus ja yökötys on lähisukulaisia. Niinpä niin, lisääntymisessä on voimakas gradientti hyvän ja pahan tiedon välillä. Sixikin oli hyvä konstruktio Darwinilta pitää kloaakki juuri killutinten vieressä.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 344: Se oli keskellä puu, joka hukkui niin paksuun varjoon, että sen olemusta ei voinut erottaa. Sillä oli jättimäinen koko, runko, joka hengitti kuin rintakehä, oksat, jotka se ulottui kauas, kuin suojaavat raajat. Hän vaikutti hyvältä, vahvalta, voimakkaalta, hedelmälliseltä; hän oli puutarhan dekaani, metsän isä, yrttien ylpeys, puskan vararehtori, joka päivä huipulla nousevan ja laskevan auringon ystävä. Sen vihreästä holvista putosi kaikki luomisen ilo: kukkien tuoksut, lintujen laulut, valopisarat, aamunkoiton raikas herääminen, hämärän unen lämpö. Sen mehu oli niin vahvaa, että se virtasi sen kuoresta; hän kylpee hänet hedelmöityssumussa; se teki hänestä maan miehisyyden. Ja se riitti raivauksen lumoukseen. Muut puut hänen ympärillään rakensivat läpäisemättömän muurin, joka eristi hänet hiljaisuuden ja puolivalon tabernaakkelin syvyyteen; siellä oli vain vehreyttä, ilman pilkkua taivasta, ilman pilkahdusta horisontista, vain rotunda, joka peittyi kaikkialle lehtien pehmennettyyn silkkiin, joka oli venytetty maahan sammaleen satiinisella sametilla. Se oli sanalla sanoen kuin vanhan Goethen kyrpä.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 369: Äänet olivat tulleet selvemmiksi. Puutarhan eläimet puolestaan ​​huusivat heitä rakastamaan toisiaan kuin aikuistuneet bambit Disneyn Bambi-leffassa. Rumpali rummutti puunrunkoa. Cicadas lauloi hellällä kuoliaaksi. Perhoset levittävät suudelmia siipien räpyttäessä. Varpusilla oli hetken mielijohteisuutta, sulttaanien hyväilyt kulkivat innokkaasti seragion keskellä. Kirkkaissa vesissä kuului kutuaan auringossa olevien kalojen pyörtymistä, sammakoiden kiihkeää ja melankolista huutoa, koko salaperäinen intohimo, joka oli hirviömäisesti kyllästynyt kaislikoiden harmaaseen tylsyyteen. Metsän syvyyksissä satakielet huusivat nautinnon helmiäisnaurua, polttarit uljasivat, humalassa sellaisesta himosta, että he kuolivat väsymykseen lähes supistuneet naaraat. Ja kallioiden laatoilla, harvoin pensaiden reunalla, käärmeet, solmitut kaksi kerrallaan, sihisivät hiljaa kaxihaaraisine kyrpineen, kun taas suuret liskot haudivat munia, niiden selkärangat värähtelivät lievästä hurmiosta. Kaikkein syrjäisimmistä kulmista, auringonpaistetta, varjossa olevia reikiä, nousi eläimen haju, lämmin yleisestä urasta. Kaikessa tässä kuhisevassa elämässä oli lapsellista jännitystä. Jokaisen lehden alla sikiöi hyönteinen; jokaisessa ruohotumpussa kasvoi perhe; lentävät kärpäset, liimattuina toisiinsa, eivät odottaneet laskeutumistaan ​​lannoittaakseen. Näkymättömät elämän palaset, jotka asuttavat ainetta, aineen atomit itse, rakastivat, pariutuivat, antoivat maaperälle herkullisen liikkeen, tekivät puistosta suuren haureuden.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 376: Serge on nyt täysin parantunut pappeudesta, se on löytänyt hukkuneen miehisyytensä Albinen jalkovälistä. Serge oli juuri, Albinen hallussa, viimein löytänyt heteromiehen sukupuolen, hänen lihasten energian, sydämensä rohkeuden, äärimmäisen terveyden, joka oli tähän asti puuttunut hänen pitkästä nuoruudestaan. Nyt hän tunsi olevansa täydellinen. Hänellä oli terävämmät aistit, laajempi älykkyys, tanakampi mela. Oli kuin hän yhtäkkiä olisi herännyt leijonakuninkaana tasangolla, näkemällä vapaan taivaan. Kun hän nousi ylös, hänen jalkansa laskeutuivat suoraan maahan, hänen ruumiinsa kasvoi, ylpeä raajoistaan, varsinkin siitä pienestä (noo, ei niin pienestä paizi juuri tällä hetkellä, Serg. huom.) Hän tarttui Albinen käsiin, jotka hän puolestaan ​​nousi ylös. Hän huojui hieman, ja hänen täytyi tukea häntä. "Älä pelkää", hän sanoi. "Olet se jota tällä haavaa rakastan, luulisin."
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 438: Hän otti muutaman askeleen ja huusi: - Näen sinut, tiedän, että olet alasti... Se on kauhistus. Oletko peto juoksemaan metsässä tämän naisen kanssa? Hän vei sinut pitkälle, sano! Hän raahasi sinut lahoon, ja tässä olette kaikki karvan peitossa kuin vuohi... Vedä oksa esiin murtaaksesi sen hänen lanteilleen! Tai anna mä vedän, mullon oxa valmiina!
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 497: Hän ei tunnistanut hänen käsiään, jotka olivat kerran lämpimiä hyväilyistä, eikä hänen notkeaa kaulaansa, joka soi kuin narusta vetämällä, eikä hermostuneita jalkojaan, joiden laukka kantoi hänet vehreyden syvyyteen. Oliko tämä sitten se poika, jolla oli vahvat lihakset, löysä kaulus, joka näytti rintakehän alaosat, auringon kukoistava iho, elämästä värähtelevä lanne, jonka syleilyssä hän oli elänyt vuoden ajan? Tällä hetkellä hänellä ei näyttänyt enää olevan lihaa, hänen hiuksensa olivat häpeällisesti pudonneet, kaikki hänen miehisyytensä kuivui tämän naisenmekon alla, mikä jätti hänet ilman seksiä. Hyi helkkari!
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 542: Tässä Jeesus jälleen kerran lözähtää ristinsä painon alle. Jokaisella askeleella hän horjuu. Tällä kertaa hän kaatuu kyljelleen niin rajusti, että hän oli hetken hengästynyt. Hänen revityt kätensä pudottivat ristin. Hänen kipeät jalkansa jättävät jälkeensä veriset jalanjäljet. Kauhistuttava väsymys musertaa hänet, sillä hän kantaa harteillaan maailman synnit... - No ei ne sitten paljon paina, tuskin sataa kiloa. Ei tollainen piipunrassi jaxa kantaa enempää.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 556: - Olit oikeassa, se on kuolema, joka mulla täällä on, se on kuolema, jonka haluan, kuolema, joka vapauttaa, joka pelastaa mut kaikesta mädyydestä... Kuuletko! Kiellän elämän, kiellän sen, syljen sen päälle. Sinun kukkasi haisee, aurinkosi sokeaa, ruohosi antaa spitaalille joka siellä makaa, puutarhasi on joukkohauta, jossa esineiden ruumiit hajoavat. Maa hikoilee kauhistusta. Valehtelet, kun puhut rakkaudesta, valosta, onnellisesta elämästä, viherpalatsin alaosassa. Sinussa on vain pimeys. Puusi tislaavat myrkkyä, joka muuttaa ihmiset eläimiksi; teidän pensaikkonne ovat mustia kyykäärmeen myrkystä; sinun joesi vierittävät ruttoa sinisten vesiensä alla. Jos repisin luonnostasi sen auringonpaisteen hameen, sen lehvistövyön, näkisit sen kauhistuttavana kuin räkä, luurangon kylkiluiden kanssa, kaikki paheiden syömä... Kiroileva siili on oikeassa, sillä oli kohta siellä!
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 575: No ei, hän oli kuitenkin jättänyt Marian Jeesuksen tähden, uhraten sydämensä voittaakseen lihansa ja haaveili uskonsa miehisyyteen vahvistuvan siitä. Marie häiritsi häntä liikaa ohuilla päänauhoillaan, ojennetuilla käsillään ja naisellisella hymyllään. Hän ei voinut polvistua hänen eteensä laskematta silmiään, koska pelkäsi näkevänsä hänen hameensa alle. Sitten hän syytti hiäntä siitä, että hiän oli ollut liian lempeä hänelle aiemmin; hiän oli pitänyt häntä niin kauan mekkonsa poimujen välissä, että hän oli antanut itsensä pujahtaa hiänen käsistään olennon reitten väliin, huomaamatta edes hänen arkuutensa muuttuvan. Ja hän muisti veli Siilin julmuudet, hänen kieltäytymisensä ihailla Mariaa, varovaisen katseen, jolla hän näytti katselevan häntä. Hän ei halunnut koskaan nousta sellaiseen ankaruuteen; hän yksinkertaisesti hylkäsi Maarian, piilotti hänen kuvansa, hylkäsi hänen alttarinsa. Mutta hiän pysyi syvällä hänen sydämessään, kuin tunnustamaton rakkaus, aina läsnä.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 597: Jeesus vetäytyessään pois takakautta oli vienyt pois armon. Hän, joka oli niin vahva taivaan avun aamusta asti, tunsi olonsa yhtäkkiä kurjaksi, hylätyksi, lapsellisen heikoksi. Ja mikä kauhea pudotus, mikä suunnaton katkeruus! Taistella sankarillisesti, seisoa voittamattomana, armottomana, kun kiusaus oli olemassa, elossa, pyöreänä vartalonsa, upeine hartioineen, intohimoisen naisen tuoksuineen; sitten alistua häpeällisesti, haukkoa henkeä kauhistuttavasta halusta, kun kiusaus väistyy jättäen jälkeensä vain hameen väreet, vaalean niskan niskasta virtaavan hajuveden! Nyt, pelkkien muistojen kanssa, hän palasi kaikkivoipaana, hän hyökkäsi kirkkoon.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 647: Hän nautti kauhistuksestaan ​​kirotun miehen ilolla. Raivo ravisteli häntä hänen muistellessaan ilkeitä sanoja, joita hän oli lausunut Albinin jalkojen edessä. Sillä hetkellä ne soimasivat häntä syyttääkseen häntä Jumalan edessä. Hän näet oli tunnustanut naisen suvereenikseen, ja sellainen ei käy. Hiän oli orjuuttanut hänet, hän sai suudella hiänen jalkoväliään ja haaveilla olevansa vesi, jota hiän joi, leipä, jota hiän söi. Nyt hän ymmärsi, miksi hän ei enää voinut toipua. Jumala oli nolosti jättänyt hänet naiselle.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 657: Ja hän jatkoi haaveiluaan. Hän ei ollut koskaan nähnyt asioita näin kirkkaassa valossa. Kaikki näytti hänestä nyt helpolta, hän piti itseään niin vahvana. Koska Albine odotti häntä, hän liittyisi häneen. Se oli luonnollista. Aamulla hän oli todellakin naittanut Onni-klovnin Rosalien kanssa. Kirkko ei kieltänyt avioliittoa. Mixei sitten mennä naimiaisiin Albinen kaa? Eikö hän ollut hänen kumppaninsa, hänen alistuva palvelijansa, se, jonka Jumala lähetti hänelle, jottei hänen miehisyytensä kuivuisi yksinäisyyteen? Lisäksi he olivat sukulaisia. Hän oli edelleen hyvin hämmästynyt, ettei hän ollut ymmärtänyt sitä heti, ettei hän ollut lähtenyt hänen kanssaan, kuten velvollisuus vaati.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 669: Pappi unexuu että Desiree-siskon takapihan elukat valtaa kirkon, sepä oliskin aika pyhäinhäväistys! Kananpoikia, kaneja, kukko ja possu vieläpä, nuuskimassa jeesuxen, jumalan ja neizyt Maarian kamoja ja kakkaamassa nurkkiin. Varpusetkin on jo pahoja. Ne on samat ihmiset jotka kauhistelee tätä ja tappaa bakteereja keittiöstä bakteereja tappavilla aineilla. Tää on muuten hyvin samaa vuodatusta kuin oli Flaubertilla siinä pyhän Antoniuxen kiusauxessa. Luulenpa että katolisuus saa rasvaisissa tyypeissä aikaan tällästä.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 677: Kaksikymmentä kertaa hän yritti pysäyttää sieppaussuunnitelman, järjestää heidän olemassaolonsa onnellisina rakastajina. Hän ei löytänyt mitään. Nyt se halu ei enää raivostuttanut häntä, tilanteen käytännöllinen puoli kauhistutti häntä, kohtasi hänen heikkojen käsiensä kanssa monimutkaisen tehtävän, josta hän ei tiennyt ensimmäistä sanaa. Mihin he veivät hevoset pelastamaan itsensä? Jos he lähtisivät jalan, eikö heitä pysäytettäisi kuin kulkurit? Sitä paitsi voisiko hän työllistyä, löytää minkä tahansa ammatin, joka voisi tarjota leipää hänen vaimolleen? Hänelle ei ollut koskaan opetettu näitä asioita. Hän jätti elämän huomiotta; Hän löysi muistiaan tutkiessaan vain rukouksen palasia, seremonian yksityiskohtia, Bouvierin teologisen ohjeen sivuja, jotka opittiin aiemmin ulkoa seminaarissa. Jopa merkityksettömät asiat nolostivat häntä kovasti. Hän mietti, uskaltaisiko hän antaa vaimolleen kätensä kadulla. Hän ei tietenkään voinut kävellä naisen kädessään. Hän vaikuttaisi niin kömpelöltä, että maailma kääntyisi ylösalaisin.
    xxx/ellauri177.html on line 679: Hänet arvattaisiin papixi, kaikki loukkaisivat Albinea. Turhaan hän yritti pestä pois pappeuden, hän kantoi aina mukanaan sen surullista kalpeutta, suitsukkeen hajua. Entä jos hänellä olisi joku päivä lapsia? Tämä odottamaton ajatus sai hänet aloittamaan. Hän tunsi outoa vastenmielisyyttä. Hän luuli, ettei hän pitäisi niistä. Heitä olisi kuitenkin kaksi, pieni poika ja pieni tyttö. Hän työnsi heidät pois polviltaan ja kärsi siitä, että tunsi heidän kätensä lepäävän hänen vaatteillaan, mutta ei ottanut muiden isien iloa räjäyttää niitä. Hän ei ollut tottunut tähän lihaansa, joka hänestä aina näytti hikoavan hänen epäpuhtauksiaan ihmisenä. Erityisesti pikkutyttö häiritsi häntä suurilla silmillään, joiden syvyyksissä naisen hellyys jo loisti. Mutta ei, hänellä ei olisi lapsia, hän välttäisi kauhua, jonka hän tunsi näkevänsä raajojensa kasvavan takaisin ja elävän ikuisesti. Joten toivo olla impotentti oli hänelle hyvin suloinen. Epäilemättä hänen miehisyytensä oli mennyt pois hänen pitkän nuoruutensa aikana. Se päätti hänet. Illalla hän pakenisi Albinen kanssa, syteen tai saveen.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 74: "Christa called". Claire saa paskahalvauxen. God I´m fond of adultery! Aren´t you? ne sanoi toisilleen. Kelvotonta väkeä. Norjalainen Inga Larsen (Drenka) antoi Rothille sybigaalista lähimezässä. She was an adjunct to Roth´s domestic life. Apulaisprostituutti. Roth arvioi piikittäneensä Ingaa 1000x 20v varrella. Kerran viikossa. Molemmat oli koukussa salailuun. Maxapalaan nyt kiireesti kun äitini ei näe! Pili tykkäs vetää käteen Ingan kazoessa päältä ja ojentaa runkkuisia näpkinejä sille lahjana kuin Viiru kissa rotanhäntiä. Man led by the penis, hännän viemä mies, sanoi Ingan terapeutti Rothista. Se soitti kaukopuheluja Ingalle keskellä työpäivää ja käski kuunnella kun se runkkasi äheltäen puhelimeen ja heti tultuaan löi luurin kiinni. Not so much as thanx. Kuten Solzhenizyn sanoi, taide voittaa valheenkin! Todesta puhumattakaan.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 76: Mixture of kindness and cruelty. Juutalaista menoa, ihan kuin Jehova. Anna Steiger muka löi ja potki äiskyä nimellä "kike bitch". (Rod Steiger oli goy.) Ritarillinen Roth puuttui asiaan ja kielti käyttämästä sellaista kieltä äidistä. Kike se oli izekin. Sen se ottikin izeensä. Siitä lähtien se ja Anna oli enemyjä kuin David ja filistealaiset. Annasta tuli oopperalaulaja. Roth muutti ulos muttei Lontoosta koska se oli vuokrannut molemmat kämppänsä ja oli muka vieläkin "hopelessly devoted to you". Mutta renting an apt in London would have disastrous tax consequences, advised an American lawyer. Phil oli varsinainen Shylock. I´m not going to be defeated by this kid, se murisi kuin karhu erauspennulle. Annalle tehtiin oma koppi pimeästi Clairen huoneiston nurkkaan (Clairen rahoilla). Säästyihän sekin penni.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 78: "Anna is nuts. She is fatter than ever", Roth skrivaa kamulle. Pian grim faced Roth sai kylläxeen ja työnsi erokirjeen "käteen" Clairelle. Ei ollut textareita vielä kai. Ei ollutkaan erokirje vaan kirjallinen häätö Annalle! This town is too small for the two of us. No Pilihän se senkin kisan hävisi. Se oli leuaton luuseri.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 109: Snorrin mielestä niissä mentiin liian pitkälle. Snorri draws the line at mixed metaphor, which he terms nykrat "nykrätty, made monstrous" (Snorri Sturluson: Háttatal 6), and his nephew called the practice löstr "a fault" (Óláfr hvítaskáld: Third Grammatical Treatise 80). In spite of this, it seems that "many poets did not object to and some must have preferred baroque juxtapositions of unlike kennings and neutral or incongruous verbs in their verses" (Foote & Wilson (1970), p. 332). E.g. heyr jarl Kvasis dreyra "listen, earl, to Kvasir's blood (=poetry)" (Einarr skálaglamm: Vellekla 1). Niin aina.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 124: Mitähän Pili oli näkevinään John Le Carren vakoiluromaanissa A Perfect Spy? Vai pitikö se pikemminkin Davidista izestään? David reportedly enjoyed “playing” on his first wife’s suspicion that he was homosexual. The association between homosexuality and secrecy, furtiveness and potential treachery ensured gay characters were a recurring trope in Cold War-era spy fiction. John Le Carre's The Spy Who Came In From The Cold and Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy include gay subtexts - made even more explicit in the 2011 movie adaptation of the latter. Merry Xmas from the onanist and the whore!
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 132: “I wanted to be morally serious like Joseph Conrad,” Roth said of his young self. “I wanted to exhibit my dark knowledge like Faulkner. I wanted to write literature. Instead I took my dick's advice and wrote Portnoy's Complaint.” Stern, a lifelong friend, had noticed “a discrepancy between Philip as he told stories and Philip as he wrote stories.” The advice was of course excellent, with the resulting work putting Roth squarely in the middle of the literary map. Saatuaan juutalaisten palkinnon Roth sanoi et enää puuttuu feministipalkinto ja Kakutani Prize.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 138: While she wrote that the 1,096-page epic cemented Foster-Wallace as “one of the big talents of his generation, a writer of virtuosic talents who can seemingly do anything”, she also quoted Henry James in calling Jest a “loose, baggy monster”, adding that it read like a “vast, encyclopedic compendium of whatever seems to have crossed Mr Wallace’s mind”. In his 2012 biography of the late Foster-Wallace, DT Max wrote that the writer “told a friend he hid in his room for two days and cried after reading yet another paragraph of Rei devoted to parallels between his first book and Pynchon’s most popular novel”.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 145: Isaac Singer’s response to his critics: “ ‘Why do you write about Jewish thieves and Jewish prostitutes?’ . . . ‘Shall I write about Spanish thieves and Spanish prostitutes? I write about the thieves and prostitutes that I know.’"
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 159: This isn’t Nabokov’s ice-blue disdain for the academic ninnyhammers who went snorting after his truffles. Roth, instead, worries himself, as though a sick tooth needed tonguing. He is looking over his shoulder because somebody—probably Irving Howe—might be gaining on him: “This me who is me being me and no other!” as Tarnopol explained at the end of My Life as a Man.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 309: Isaiah 16:14 But now the Lord speaks, saying, “Within three years, as a hired man would count them, the glory of Moab will be degraded along with all his great population, and his remnant will be very small and impotent.”
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 311: Acts 4:9 If we this day be examined of the good deed done to the impotent man, by what means he is made whole;
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 315: Acts 14:8 And there sat a certain man at Lystra, impotent in his feet, being a cripple from his mother's womb, who never had walked.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 332: Q: Thoughtful response, but I’m not sure it addresses the “Christian response” part. Is there anything biblically/theologically that influences this topic?
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 357: Hänen kuuluisin näytelmänsä on 1895 julkaistu Lokki kivellä. Lokki kärsi aluksi täydellisen epäonnistumisen Pietarissa ja saavutti suosiota vasta Moskovassa kolme vuotta myöhemmin. Tämän jälkeen ”tšehovilaiset” näytelmät saavuttivat yhä kasvavaa suosiota. Hänen viimeisiksi teoksikseen jäivät näytelmät Vanja-eno (1900), Kolme sisarta (1901) ja Kirsikkapuisto (1904). (Nimenomaan niin, ei mikään "Kirsikkapuutarha"!) Vuonna 1901 Tšehov solmi avioliiton näytelmiensä sankarittaren, Moskovan teatterin taiteellisen näyttelijättären Olga Knipperin (1868-1959) kanssa. Anton oli 41, Olga 33. No kohtahan Anton jo sitten kuolikin. Vuonna 1904 Tšehov oli hoidattamassa tuberkuloosiaan Badenweilerin kylpyläkaupungissa Saksassa, mutta menehtyi sairauteensa. In his last letter he complained about the way German women dressed.
    xxx/ellauri178.html on line 362: On 25 May 1901, Chekhov married Olga Knipper quietly, owing to his horror of weddings. She was a former protégée and sometime lover of Nemirovich-Danchenko whom he had first met at rehearsals for The Seagull. Up to that point, Chekhov, known as "Russia's most elusive literary bachelor," had preferred passing liaisons and visits to brothels over commitment. For the rest, he lived largely at Yalta, she in Moscow, pursuing her acting career. In 1902, Olga suffered a miscarriage; and Americans have offered evidence, based on the couple's letters, that conception may have occurred when Chekhov and Olga were apart, although Russian scholars have rejected that claim. Perhaps the semen was conveyed from Yalta to Moscow by snail mail.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 42: Vittu mikä saasta! Etniinkö selitettyjen hirmuisuuxien sarja on joteskin parempi? Määrätietoisempaa kidutusta ja tappoa? Mut niihä tää paskiainen nautti sodastakin, se on miesten työtä. Samoin ne muutkin "miehiset" harrastuxet, kaikki samaa väkivaltaista sadismia. Hyvä että karvanaama kaappihomo ampui luodin päähänsä, se oli ainoa riistaeläin johon tuli hyvä osuma.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 59: Hemingwauta on käsitelty luokkaesimerkkinä setämiehistä albumissa 8, lukematta edes ainoatakaan sen teosta. Nyt on aika korjata tätä puutetta.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 69: Is this the little girl I carried?

    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 70: Is this the little boy at play?

    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 111: The novel tells the story of Richard Lamb, a young Englishman who marries a teenage Argentinian girl, Paquita, without asking her father's permission, and is forced to flee to Montevideo, Uruguay with his bride. Lamb leaves his young wife with a relative while he sets off for eastern Uruguay to find work for himself. He soon becomes embroiled in adventures with the Uruguayan gauchos and romances with local women. Toivottavasti se oli ympärileikattu ettei gonorrhea turvottanut nuppia. After the events of the story he was captured by Paquita's father and thrown into prison for three years, during which time Paquita herself died of grief.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 115: Venezuela, c. 1875. Abel, a young man of wealth, fails at a revolution and flees Caracas into the uncharted forests of Guayana. Surviving fever, failing at journal-keeping and gold hunting, he settles in an Indian village to waste away his life: playing guitar for old Cla-Cla, hunting badly with Kua-kó, telling stories to the children.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 121: Abel falls in love with Rima, but she (17 and a stranger to white men) is confused by "odd feelings". This relationship is further strained because Abel cannot speak her unknown language.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 124: Abel kills Kua-kó and runs to the enemy tribe, sounding the alarm. Days later he returns. All his Indian friends are dead. He finds the giant tree burned, and collects Rima's ashes in a pot. Trekking homeward, despondent and hallucinating, Abel is helped by Indians and Christians until he reaches the sea, sane and healthy again. Now an old man, his only ambition is to be buried with Rima's ashes. Reflecting back, he believes neither God nor man can forgive his sins, but that gentle Rima would, provided he has forgiven himself.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 126: What the fuck, gentle Rima would prickle his ass with darts if she could. Kayla Ancrum would gleefully join in.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 128: Rima the Jungle Girl returned to the DC Universe in a new pulp-era comic debuting in 2010 entitled First Wave. Rima was portrayed as a South American native with piercings and tattoos, who didn't speak, but communicated in bird-like whistles like Roger Whitaker. Plying a big knife and a panther, she helped Doc Savage's assistant Johnny Littlejohn, then darted back into the forest.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 149: The Jewish Princeton man and writer Cohn believes in love, romance and the ideals he finds in literature but he gets on the nerves of most of the other men in the novel by the way he pathetically hangs around Brett and with his "superior, Jewish" way. He becomes a target for the other men's dissatisfaction.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 151: Kake, the narrator of The Sun Also Rises is an expatriate working as a journalist in Paris. He served in World War I, in which he suffered an injury that made him impotent. This somewhat hinders his otherwise very close relationship with Brett Ashley. He typifies the Lost Generation, always seeking escape and finding no meaning in life having lost his dick in the horrors and intensity of the war.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 153: The Lady Brett Ashley character is a British, charismatic, and independent woman with a drinking problem. She is the love of Kake's life and she loves him too, but she (and Kake) both see his impotence as a possible obstacle to a relationship as she leads a promiscuous life of romantic adventures. She is waiting to get divorced from the aristocrat from whom she got her title, and then plans to marry Mike Campbell. She is terminally unhappy and always wanting someone else. She falls in love with Romero at the bullfight and becomes his inspiration at the ring.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 155: Bill Gorton is Kake's buddy from the war. A writer who moved back to America after the war, he is a joker, using humor to disguise the horrors of the war. He doesn't mind, for his penis remains shipshape and intact. He goes along with the group, unattached to Brett but getting caught up in the romantic business anyway.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 159: Montoya is the owner of the hotel in Pamplona where Kake and his best friends, the bullfighters, stay. He shares a special bond with Kake. A French war obligation I bet.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 171: Wheeler was a native of Brookfield Township in Trumbull County, Ohio where he was raised on his family's farm. A childhood accident caused by an intoxicated hired hand gave Wheeler a lifelong aversion to alcohol. He practically lost his dick in the accident. He used the story later to recruit converts to the prohibition movement and to promote a prohibition amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 175: Soon after his retirement, Wheeler was beset by several tragedies. His wife was killed in an accidental kitchen fire, and his father-in-law had a fatal heart attack after trying unsuccessfully to aid her. Wheeler suffered from kidney disease contracted from abuse of booze, and died at an asylum in Battle Creek, Michigan on September 5, 1927.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 181: Whereas Hemingway wrote passionately about boxing and his own prowess, others, like Dempsey, saw something else. “There were a lot of Americans in Paris and I sparred with a couple, just to be obliging,” the Champ said. “But there was one fellow I wouldn’t mix it with. That was Ernest Hemingway. He was about twenty-five or so and in good shape, and I was getting so I could read people, or anyway men, pretty well. I had this sense that Hemingway, who really thought he could box, would come out of the corner like a madman. To stop him, I would have to hurt him badly, I didn’t want to do that to Hemingway. That’s why I never sparred with him.” Hemingway’s frequent sparring partner and fellow writer Morley Callaghan offered another sobering account of his training partner, saying, “we were two amateur boxers. The difference between us was that Ernie had given time and imagination to boxing; I had actually worked out a lot with good fast college boxers.” I had never seen Mr. Hemingway box, of course. But I will say this: the confidence of mediocre men is a fucking superpower. I have met many versions of this guy. Hell, I’ve sparred with the dude myself.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 193: The conventional view is that Hemingway’s true “religion” — insofar as he can be said to have one at all — is his famous “Cod”: that in order to give meaning to life, one had to live by some set of ethical principles.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 199: But if Hemingway’s conversions were sincere — and there is little reason to think they were not — then his “cod” is not based on the agnosticism of a disillusioned existentialist, but rather on the comprehensive, universal affirmation of Christianity.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 201: Still, the fact that they bring up Hemingway’s Catholicism at all confirmed my own suspicions of a deeper, clear-eyed spiritual sensibility lurking behind all of Hemingway’s naturalistic plots — forcing me to reconsider everything I had previously thought about the man. I see Catholicism as playing a central role in Hemingway’s literary vision and moral landscape. Non-catholics just turn away from the religious clues in his work to focus on his public image, war exploits, and psychological instability — all the while missing that singularly under-reported and significant aspect of Hemingway’s life as a writer: his Catholicism.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 203: Hemingway was raised in a Congregationalist Protestant home, and his first conversion to Catholicism occurred when he was a 19-year-old and volunteer ambulance driver in Italy during World War I. Two weeks into the job, he was delivering candy (LOL) to soldiers on the frontlines when he was hit by machine-gun fire and more than 200 metal fragments from an exploding mortar round. An Italian priest recovered his body, baptized him right on the battlefield and gave him the last rites.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 205: Hemingway later described what happened this way:
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 208: After having been anointed, Hemingway described himself as having become a “Super-Catholic.” It was a near-death experience that changed the course of his life. After the war, he went to work as a foreign correspondent in Paris. And eight years later — after his first marriage failed — he undertook a second, more formal conversion process in preparation for marriage to his second wife, devout Catholic Pauline Pfieffer.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 212: It was at this time that Hemingway changed the title of his unpublished first novel, tentatively titled “Lost Generation,” to “The Sun Also Rises.” And writing to another friend, he declared, “If I am anything I am a Catholic . . . I cannot imagine taking any other religion seriously.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 216: Unfortunately, his subsequent divorces and additional marriages, drunken brawling, domestic abuse, poison pen letters, paranoia, megalomania, and habitual womanizing tarnished his youthful sense of himself as a “super-Catholic.” Hemingway never wanted to be known as a “Catholic writer” because he simply felt he couldn’t live up to the responsibility.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 218: In a letter to his friend Father Vincent Donavan in 1927 just before he married his second wife, Hemingway wrote, “I have always had more faith than intelligence or knowledge and I have never wanted to be known as a Catholic writer because I know the importance of setting an example — and I have never set a good example.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 222: He thought of himself, like many of his egoes (Nick Adams, Jake Barns, Robert Jordan, Francis McComber and Santiago), as a man struggling to live with grace and die a good death in a violent, unforgiving world where all of you others must suffer.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 224: The first time I read Hemingway’s books, I found an irrepressible piety and sense of the sacred permeating all his naturalistic plots. Had I known then about his Catholicism, it would have clarified things — and made the books better.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 227: Knowing these things does not explain away all the troubling aspects of Hemingway’s egocentric personal life — his public inebriations, domestic abuse, womanizing, and suicide, but it helps me to understand the kinds of people Hemingway admired, their motivations and ideals, and the brave, virtuous person he was attempting to become.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 229: Ernest Hemingway was born a Protestant but converted to Catholicism when he married Pauline Pfeiffer, his second Wife. Pauline was an observant Catholic who took her religion seriously. Hemingway, who was never observant, but arguably always religious told Gary Cooper that becoming a Catholic was one of the best things he’d done in his life. Gary was also Catholic and Hem and Coop had a life long bond.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 233: Of the 7 suicides that Mariel Hemingway is aware of in her family, 1 was of Ernest’s father, & 3 of his father’s 6 children (if one assumes that Hemingway did commit suicide). There still is no official decision–and there may never be–as to whether the death of the writer early Sunday from the blast of a 12-gauge shotgun had been an accident or suicide. However, the fact that Mr. Hemingway had been divorced would bar him from a Catholic Church funeral anyway. Catholic sources said there was nothing improper in a Catholic priest saying prayers at graveside.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 260: Turauxen on kirjoittanut joku Anders Hallengren, an associate professor of Comparative Literature and a research fellow in the Department of History of Literature and the History of Ideas at Stockholm University. Heserved as consulting editor for literature at Nobelprize.org. Dr. Hallengren is a fellow of The Hemingway Society (USA) and was on the Steering Committee for the 1993 Guilin ELT/Hemingway International Conference in the People’s Republic of China. Among his works in English are The Code of Concord: Emerson’s Search for Universal Laws; Gallery of Mirrors: Reflections of Swedenborgian Thought; and What is National Literature: Lectures on Emerson, Dostoevsky, Hemingway and the... Pelkkiä noloja setämiehiä!
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 277: She was Ernest Hemingway's mother. Huomaa keskimmäinen nimi! Pikku Ernestosta oli määrä tulla Ernestine, mutta vitun kakara syntyikin pipu housuissa! Äiskä haisee narsistilta mailien päähän. Sillä oli selkeästi perheessä housut jalassa. Ernest Hemingway had a difficult relationship with his mother, beginning in his teen years. She asserted her authority over every Hemingway family member, including her husband. She put many demands on her children, insisting they participate in activities that were important to her.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 281: By the time he was on to his most open-minded wife, Mary, his final spouse, they were exchanging letters about hair that were, Dearborn says, ‘frankly pornographic’, while indulging in sexual role-swapping in bed. Of course, Hemingway — who won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1954 — wouldn’t be the first genius to have a somewhat less impressive private life. The real Hemingway was self-pitying, self-glorifying and thin-skinned, ready to turn viciously on friends on the slightest provocation. Kake kavereineen tossa Ford Fiesta kirjassa vaikutti täys paskiaisilta ihan miehissä. Mitääntekemättömiä renttuja.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 283: Hemingway blamed her for using money meant for his college education on building a cottage near their home in a smart Chicago suburb so she could indulge in a lesbian love affair with the family nanny, Ruth Arnold, a woman 19 years her junior.


    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 284: Bernice Kert states: "It has also been said that Ernest's lifelong assertion of masculine power grew out of his emotional need to exorcise the painful memory of his mother asserting her superiority over his father." Major General Charles Lanham, a friend of Ernest's, said that he was the only man he ever knew who really hated his mother. Tutun oloista.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 286: To read Hemingway has always produced strong reactions. When his parents received the first copies of their son’s book In Our Time (1924), they read it with horror. Furious, his father sent the volumes back to the publisher, as he could not tolerate such filth in the house. Hemingway’s apparently coarse, crude, vulgar and unsentimental style and manners appeared equally shocking to many people outside his family. On the other hand, this style was precisely the reason why a great many other people liked his work. A myth, exaggerating those features, was to be born.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 296: In Hemingway, sentimentality, sympathy, and empathy are turned inwards, toward himself. Neither Hemingway the man nor Hemingway the writer should be labeled “hard-boiled” - his macho style of living and speaking and the alleged hard-boiled mind behind it are better labeled "addled".
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 298: An unmatched introduction to Hemingway’s particular skill as a writer is the beginning of A Farewell to Arms, certainly one of the most pregnant opening paragraphs in the history of the modern American novel. In that passage the power of concentration reaches a peak, forming a vivid and charged sequence, as if it were a 10-second video summary. It is packed with events and excitement, yet significantly frosty, as if unresponsive and numb, like a silent flashback dream sequence in which bygone images return, pass in review and fade away, leaving emptiness and quietude behind them. The lapidary writing approaches the highest style of poetry, vibrant with meaning and emotion, while the pace is maintained by the exclusion of any descriptive redundancy, of obtrusive punctuation, and of superfluous or narrowing emotive signs:
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 310: He's like a Pilgrim robbing red Indians of their land, walking into the unknown with neither shelter nor guidance, thrown upon his own resources, his strength and his judgment. Hemingway’s style is the style of understatement since his hero is a hero of military action, which is the human condition.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 312: There is an illuminating text in William James (1842-1910) which is both significant and reminiscent, bridging the gap between Puritan moralism, its educational parables and exempla, and lost-generation turbulent heroism. In a letter written in Yosemite Valley to his brother Henry William James wrote:
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 314: “I saw a moving sight the other morning before breakfast in a little hotel where I slept in the dusty fields. The young man of the house had shot a little wolf called coyote in the early morning. The heroic little animal lay on the ground, with his big furry ears, and his clean white teeth, and his jolly cheerful little body, but his brave little life was gone. It made me think how brave all these living things are. Here little coyote was, without any clothes or house or books or money or bonds or anything, with nothing but his own naked self to pay his way with, and risking his life so cheerfully – and losing it – just to see if he could pick up a meal near the hotel. He was doing his coyote-business like a hero, and you must do your boy-business, and I my man-business bravely, too, or else we won’t be worth as much as a little coyote.” (The Letters of William James to Henry James, Little, Brown and Co.: Boston 1926.)
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 321: But what about the ugliness, then? What about all the evil, the crude, the rude, the rough, the vulgar aspects of his work, even the horror, which dismayed people? How could all that be compatible with moral standards? Niin, sas se!
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 327: "Sipping his post-coital fine à l’eau in the afternoon, David Bourne feels relieved of the contents of his testicles."
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 334: Voiko tän selvemmin enää sanoa? "Women" with a gamin hairstyle, lovers who cut and dye their hair and change sexual roles, are themes that, with variations, occur in all of his novels!
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 336: When writing The Garden of Eden he appeared as a redhead one day in May 1947. When asked about it, he said he had dyed his hair "by mistake." In that novel, the search for complete unity between boy lovers is carried to extremes. It "may seem" that the halves of the Platonic homoerotic myth (once cut in two by Zeus and ever since longing to become a spoon again) are uniting here.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 338: The voice of Hemingway’s father is heard, challenging his son, as did the Father in the Biblical Garden. Slightly disguised, Hemingway’s dear father, who haunted his son’s life and work even after he had shot himself in 1961, sorry, after Dad had shot himself in 1928, remained an internalized critic until Ernest also took his life in 1961. No wonder, dad had had a cow.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 339: “He got out his pencils and a new cahier, sharpened five pencils and began to write the story of his father."
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 352: The mahogany bar spread eight feet with dark boards underneath that swirled up to a marble top. A famous writer with taped up glasses and grey-flaked hair sat at a table in the back corner. Two Americans walked in and sat on the barstools. They acknowledged the writer and ordered drinks. They were big men, just like him, and he had seen them in here many times. It was a small room. Fifteen by thirty feet at most with windows only in the door. The writer drank his Asti Spumante. The owner of the bar, Giuseppe Cipriani, walked towards his table and crouched down.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 356: A short man half the size of Papa in blue seersuckers stepped towards him. As he walked, his left hand swung wide. The other grasped a blackthorn walking stick. “Christ you're big,” he said and his hand stuck out. He leaned his stick on the table and took off his porkpie hat. “Nick Adams,” he said and it sounded familiar. The light above the table flickered.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 358: “No names.” Papa met his hand and winked through the glasses and the light flickered. “Your freedom's at stake.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 360: “Well, what am I to call you?” He looked uneasy and his eye twitched to the left when he smiled. Underneath his eye was a four inch scythe-shaped scar.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 386: “Prosecco and peach. It's new here. It will catch on. The people will drink it.” Papa was in Italy to see his friend Ole Anderson, an old heavyweight prizefighter who lived in Fossalta di Piave now. He was always getting into trouble with bad people. Papa wrote a story about him once. A couple of men wanted to kill him in the story. Papa was in Venice to see his friend Juice, the owner of this bar Harry's, first. A man named Cole Anderson was shot outside Harry's two days ago so Papa told Juice to ask around and a man told him he'd be at Harry's today. The likeness of Ole and Cole's names drew Papa in.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 388: Juice brought the drinks and Nick Adams sipped his.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 390: “The bourgeois appreciates?” Papa laughed big and drank his grappa and picked up the walking stick. The two Americans sat drinking their grappas at the bar. One had taped up glasses and the other had messy grey-flaked hair. The one with the glasses listened closely. The other just drank.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 396: Nick accepted and the American lifted the walking stick and thrust it towards his head, snapping it loudly. Then he handed the broken pieces to Nick. Nick looked at the broken pieces and saw his life, split from his younger days. He hadn't always been a killer but he had always thought he was a big man until he met Papa.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 404: “Whoa.” He looked up at Papa and saw his past. “Whoa.” He looked at his drink. He looked at the door. He didn't say anything.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 408: He hesitated. “You are a reporter?” Papa shook his head slowly, opening his eyes wider. “Used to be.” The light above the table flickered. Juice asked if everything was all right.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 410: “He crossed the street,” Nick Adams said. “He was dead and that was all.” Papa looked at him and he looked at his drink. “I killed the wrong man.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 414: “And of this what would you say?” Nick asked desperately.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 424: “They were the two biggest women I ever saw in my life. You couldn't believe they were real when you looked at them. They ran to the street and a car hit them. The driver stepped out and fell to the ground. Dead. All four innocent! A thousand pounds on me!” He took a cigarette from his pack and pressed it to his lips and lit it. The barrel lit up then shot out smoke. He cocked one eye to keep the smoke out. The barrel pointed at Papa.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 432: “Ain't you that Hemmen-way?” Papa looked up at a man standing above the able. The light hung behind his head so his face was dark but Papa could see his slight jaw and bony cheeks.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 442: Papa grabbed his wrist and punched his stomach with it. “What do you think of that?” He looked at Papa. One of the Americans slapped him and pushed his chest. “Come on, now, boy.” The Americans made for the door. Nick followed, and then the man after him.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 446: One of the Americans feinted and knocked his right side. He fell and looked up at Papa. They were in the shade of the building, but where he fell in the sun of the street, Papa's shadow covered him.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 452: “Are you all right? We could follow him.” Nick pulled a revolver from under his coat. “I could kill him.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 454: Papa was silent. Nick wiped his gun carefully with a rag and Juice stepped outside with them.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 462: “For me, that's it. Juice, stash this gun.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 472: “No, you're not a man for that. Even in war. I've seen it. Or what you did. Not how you mean. Have child, that what man does.” Papa ran the back of his hand on his cheek and felt the tape on his glasses. “That tree. A man planted that.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 474: The tree sat in the middle of the sidewalk, grown up from a small patch of dirt and out of place in the sea of cobblestones. There hadn't been soil on this ground in years that hadn't been trucked in by men.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 476: “I must go,” Nick Adams said as he leaned towards Papa and whispered, “Not wise to be near the scene of a crime. Under any circumstances.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 484: “This.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 488: “I've come to appreciate this. The harsh details in the background with the stillness in the foreground here—” It was Swans Reflecting Elephants by Dalí. “See this arrogant son of a bitch, Juice, missing the scene. The elephants standing on the shore and the swans floating over them.” Behind the swans grew trees, twisting to the sky. “He's so arrogant. And ignorant. He walked all the way from the town up the hill in the distance and here he's facing away with his hand on his hip. He can't see the color of the sky different from the reflection in the pond.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 496: A few feet across the room hung Cézanne's Les Joueurs de carte (The Card Players). Two men face each other playing cards on a small table. “It's the man on the right, Juice.” Juice looked at Papa with concern. “The villain. Sometimes it's hard to tell. But you can trust a man who smokes a pipe. The man on the left shows us his cards. An honest man. Cézanne knew that.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 500: “His pocket lies open too. A trusting man. The man on the right sulks, looking down with his overbite and light coat. Look in the background. Look at the bar and the uncertainty beyond it and how the scene gets lighter from left to right.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 512: “The man fled after I made his day,” Papa said.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 526: “Not sure. This air is too thick for me. Too wet and too thick.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 532: “Let's get out of this rain.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 556: “Me too.” Nick Adams winked. It wasn't that he winked or what he said, but he looked bad. The shadows on his face looked bad and he smelled bad from all the smoke. Words sounded bad when they fell from his mouth. The band got louder. “An old prizefighter. Ole Anderson. I have to go to Fossalta di Piave tomorrow. He lives there.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 562: Papa did not say anything. Nick reached down for a coaster and rubbed it between his fingers.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 576: The horn man played from his heart. He played to their hearts. He raised a question and an answer and he gave a portrait of a man. The lights flickered off his horn and illuminated everyone's eyes except Nick Adams' looked black in the dark room.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 582: If you were going for a Hemingway style, you've nailed it. Unfortunately, I hate Hemingway's style. This reads a lot like him: no personality, no emotion, uninteresting, dialogue that makes me feel nauseous, feels pointless. Beige prose. Yes, you've nailed Hemingway. But don't take this criticism harshly. I'm sure someone who's a Hemingway fan (the other 55,000 subscribers) will say delightful things.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 586: Thanks for the comments. I've always been interested in his dialogue style. It is awful isn't it? He seems to want the dialogue so strange you hardly know what its about but then maybe that means something?
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 598: Legendan taustalla on todellinen taistelu, joka käytiin vuonna 778 Roncesvallesissa baskiaisten maalla. Siinä baskiaiset tuhosivat Espanjan sotaretkeltä vetäytyvän Kaarle Suuren armeijan jälkijoukon. Grimbergin Kansojen historian mukaan Rolandin laulun taustalla ollut taistelu oli suhteellisen vähäpätöinen kahakka, jossa baskiaiset, eikä suinkaan maurit, hyökkäsivät Espanjasta vetäytyneen Kaarle Suuren armeijan jälkijoukkoon tuhoten sen. Rolandin esikuva oli suhteellisen vähämerkityksinen ruhtinas, joten laulu suuresti liioittelee sekä henkilön että tapahtuman merkitystä.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 604: Alicia Rix´s study of the relationship between cycling and authorship in James’s “The Papers” sums up Jake Barnes and Bill Gorton’s exchange in The Sun Also Rises linking Henry’s bicycle to Jake’s impotence. Rix examines James’s anxiety about authorial exposure and aversion to publicity and includes embarrassing depictions of him cycling by Ford Madox Ford, David Lodge, and others. (The original manuscript shows that, before deletion, this had read "Henry James's bicycle.")
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 606: Ernest Hemingway squirmed as his second wife, Pauline, read aloud in 1927 from Henry James' novel The Awkward Age. Hemingway wondered why James bailed his characters out of their frequent inactivity by inserting a drawing room scene; and, as he was to do frequently during the next thirty years, he freely criticized the quality of James' works, "and knowing nothing about James he seems to me to be a shit." Too, he was quick to criticize the male protagonists of James,". .and the men all without any exception talk and think like fairies except a couple of caricatures of brutal outsiders". Carlos Baker observes that Hemingway, the "brutal outsider" himself, was at this time publishing Men Without Women, whose sales had reached 15,000 in the first three months after publication. But now Hemingway, the outsider, clearly in literary ascendance, was becoming acquainted with James' works; his artistic and personal recognition of James in future years was, for the most part, to take the form of a peculiar enmity. He was often to refer to James in highly derisive terms almost to the end of his own life. Hemingway's lese majeste towards him takes the form of a sporadic obsession that reveals more about Hemingway's maturity than James' imagined frailties.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 608: Young Hemingway vilified James for his choice of themes and characters, but more importantly, he viciously maligned him for the traumatic but obscure accident that had occurred in his youth. Leon Edel has summarized the known facts of the injury as gathered from James´ writings and other sources. The "obscure hurt" was reported by James to have happened at the "same dark hour" of the onset of the Civil War, in other words, May 1861 (Edel, Years 176-77). But actually the causative factor, the fire at West Stables in Newport, occurred on the night of October 28, 1861 (177). James relates that he had jammed himself into "an acute angle between two fences" trying to make "a rusty, quasi-extemporised old engine work" in order to help put out the stable fire. Injured in this attempt, James later provided only incomplete details and stated that the disaster was "intimate, odious, horrid, catastrophe, obscure, and most entirely personal" (175).
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 616: The newest biography of Henry James is the work of a Vermont law professor who has written one earlier biography, Honorable Justice, The Life of Oliver Wendell Holmes, of the “great dissenter” on the Supreme Court in the first half of our century. Proceeding from the law into literature, Sheldon M. Novick tells us in a book titled Henry James, The Young Master–as if James were a young Mozart or a Paganini and didn’t work hard to achieve literary mastery–that the celibate and sexually diffident novelist, who put most of his life into his art, was in reality a regular guy who “underwent the ordinary experiences of life.” In fact, says Novick, he had an affair at the end of the Civil War with–yes, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 617: This bit of news is quite startling. It upsets half a century of scholarship that seems to have clearly shown James was a firm bachelor with a “low amatory coefficient,” as one of his doctors put it in 1905 in New York. But Holmes is not the only homosexual lover Novick claims for James. He also says that James had an affair with Paul Zhukovski, a Russian aristocrat James met in 1876 in the entourage of Ivan Turgenev.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 619: Novick’s attempt to find love affairs in James’ life reminds me of the 1920s, when there were no biographies of James, and critics loved to speculate on the mysteries of his privacy. Van Wyck Brooks, a skillful writer of pastiche, produced his quasi-biographical Pilgrimage of Henry James to prove the novelist was a literary failure because he had uprooted himself from the United States. Edna Kenton, a devoted Jamesian in Greenwich Village, demonstrated in a biting review in The Bookman that Brooks used important James quotations out of context. Years later, Brooks confessed to having nightmares “in which Henry James turned great luminous menacing eyes upon me.”
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 621: Another bit of imaginative projection upon James’ life can be found in Ernest Hemingway’s letters. This novelist, on learning that Brooks had written that James was “prevented by an accident from taking part in the Civil War,” immediately incorporated this into his nearly finished novel, The Sun Also Rises. In Chapter 12, Jake Barnes refers to his World War I accident, and Gorton says, “That’s the sort of thing that can’t be spoken of. That’s what you ought to work up into a mystery. Like Henry’s bicycle.” Barnes replies it wasn’t a bicycle; “he was riding horseback.” (In his memoirs, James spoke of having had a “horrid” but “obscure hurt.” He had strained his back during a stable fire while serving as a volunteer fireman.) Hemingway had originally inserted James’ name in the novel, but Scribner’s editor, Maxwell Perkins, vetoed this. Hemingway insisted. They finally compromised on the “Henry” alone. F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote to Brooks, “Why didn’t you touch more on James’ impotence (physical) and its influence?” The castration theme was picked up by R.P. Blackmur, Glenway Wescott, Lionel Trilling, and F.O. Matthiessen in their critical writings.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 623: What evidence does Novick offer for the James-Holmes “affair”? Just two French words James uses in his long and vivid notebook entry recalling his early days in Boston, where his family settled in a brick house in Ashburton Place near the State House. The words are l’initiation première–“first initiation.” In the entry, James is writing generally of the “rite of passage” that inaugurated his literary career. He describes the strong emotions he felt at the assassination of Lincoln (on James’$2 22nd birthday); how he wept when Hawthorne died; and the dawning sense of freedom experienced after the war’s end. He mentions also his first book review on English novel-writing, published in the North American Review, whose editors paid him $12, praised his writing, and asked for more. He does mention Holmes, but only to describe a brief visit he made to Holmes’ mother to ask how her son was faring in England, and his own fierce envy of Holmes for traveling abroad while James remained at home.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 625: These larger emotions apparently do not touch the single-minded Novick. He is caught by l’initiation première. “The passage seems impossible to misunderstand,” he says. (For the full quote, which Novick does not provide,.) In a footnote, he asserts, “James had his sexual initiation in Cambridge and Ashburton Place.” A bit enigmatically, he also says, “[I]t would be fatal to expand on that in the book for which these are the [foot]notes.” We are left wondering why Novick thinks it would be “fatal” to have what would be a bit more evidence. And he still hasn’t named James’ partner. A sentence in which he appears to be rummaging around for explanations says that the companion “seems to be a veteran, an officer.” He adds, “Henry hinted he was Wendell Holmes.” But it is Novick who is doing the hinting. Holmes was a close friend of Henry’s brother, William. Henry looked at Holmes with a certain aloofness.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 627: And then, Novick gives himself away. He writes in another footnote that Holmes was someone with whom James “might have been intimate.” “Might have been”? There’s incertitude for you. My surmise is that Novick is trying to support his hypothesis of James’ initial sexual experience, and that he picks the name handiest to him. Why not James’ closer friends, John LaFarge or Thomas Perry? Novick seems to want to link his two subjects. It is clear the homosexuality doesn’t bother him. He simply wants us to know that James was a sexual man and a loving person. Biographers often develop strange attachments to their subjects. (Indeed!)
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 629: Novick’s second “case” is as flimsy as the first, but it has more documentation. It is based on James’ letters from Paris between 1875 and 1876. He has met Ivan Turgenev, the Russian master, and finds himself moving among assorted Russians. One of them is Paul Zhukovski, son of a Russian poet who tutored Alexander II when he was a prince. Reared in the royal court, Zhukovski is soft, dependent, spoiled, and weak-willed, but graceful and entertaining. James has never known any Russians, and Zhukovski becomes an agreeable companion; he is “picturesque,” and while James tells his parents that “human fellowship” is not his specialty, the two get along very comfortably. They dine with Turgenev, and with countesses, a duke, princesses. They make sorties into cabarets and cafes. James reports that he and Zhukovski have sworn “eternal fellowship.” One could read sex into this–as Novick does–but it sounds more like the drinking and singing that often takes place among young males, their swagger and “brotherhood.” At every turn, Novick introduces suggestions of a love affair.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 631: At the end of 1876, James moved to London. So far as we know, Zhukovski faded into the distance. James published seven books during the next three years and became a celebrity in London society. But Novick continues to allude to Zhukovski as if the relationship were of paramount importance to James. Only one letter from the Russian, written in 1879, survives. Zhukovski is in Italy and invites James to join him at the Villa Postiglione, his pension, at Posilipo, near Naples. While in Rome, James reserves a room in the pension for five days.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 635: Writing to his sister Alice, James characterized Zhukovski as “the same impracticable and indeed ridiculous mixture of Nihilism and bric-à-brac as before.” He adds that Zhukovski always needs to be sheltered by a strong figure: “First he was under Turgenev, then the Princess Urusov, whom he now detests and who despises him, then under H.J. Jr. (!!), then under that of a certain disagreeable Onegin (the original of Turgenev’s Nazhdanov, in Virgin Soil) now under Wagner, and apparently in the near future that of Madame Wagner.” Novick bypasses these letters; he avoids looking at facts that might spoil his case. He does allude to the James remark about Zhukovski’s bric-a-brac, but he seems to misunderstand its irony. He claims that James was “cautious” about this visit because of crime and disease in the Naples area–all this, says Novick, is “out of keeping with the collection of bric-à-brac with which Zhukovski was surrounded.” James may indeed have been referring to the villa’s human bric-a-brac.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 639: So Novick is deprived of the happy romance he wanted to chronicle at Posilipo. He consoles himself by a detailed account of Zhukovski’s adoption into Bayreuth, his painting the sets for Parsifal and being considered a kind of son by the Wagners. Novick seems to be trying to walk down two streets at once–the street of the refinements of literary biography and the more rigid roadway of the prosecutorial argument. He attempts to turn certain of his fancies into fact–but his data is simply too vague for him to get away with it.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 646: Book II comprises a sort of mid-book idyll. The author offers it to us by way of contrast to the Paris scenes that went before. In this novel, Pamplona will serve as a kind of anti-Paris, semi-rural and organic where the City of Light is urban and decadent. The woods outside Burguete where Kake and Bill fish for trout are even more different from Paris, and the sense of tranquility that the fishing trip creates in them and us could not be more different from the freneticism of the novel's opening chapters.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 650: Another theme of Kake and Bill's banter concerns the latter's status as an expatriate. He has fled America, with its prudish Anti-Saloon League and bourgeois President Coolidge (who famously said "The business of America is business"). Finally, note the gruff tenderness shared by Kake and Bill in these scenes. One of Hemingway's pleasures in life as in art was what we now call "male bonding," and in this case the bonding is poignant, as in some ways it replaces the love that Kake cannot fully express with female companions. Haha, so you must mean dick, that's the only thing Bill has and they don't.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 652: More black humor: "Get up," Kake tells Bill, who replies "What? I never get up." Of course, it is Kake, not Bill, who never gets up. Later, trout (again, a phallic fish) try in vain to swim against the current of a waterfall, and — not so humorously — Kake reads a book about a man frozen inside a glacier whose wife awaits the reappearance of his body for twenty-four years. Kake is "frozen," too, only no one has the patience to await his unthawing.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 654: William Jennings Bryan (March 19, 1860 – July 26, 1925) was an American orator and politician. Beginning in 1896, he emerged as a dominant force in the Democratic Party, running three times as the party's nominee for President of the United States in the 1896, 1900, and the 1908 elections, always losing. He served in the House of Representatives from 1891 to 1895 and as the Secretary of State under Woodrow Wilson. Because of his faith in the wisdom of the common people, he was often called "The Great Commoner". Pöljän näköinen kalju paxulainen.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 655: After leaving office, Bryan retained some of his influence within the Democratic Party, but he increasingly devoted himself to religious matters and anti-evolution activism. He opposed Darwinism on religious and humanitarian grounds, most famously in the 1925 Daytona monkey case, aka Scopes Trial. Since his death in 1925, Bryan has elicited mixed reactions from various commentators, but he is widely considered to have been one of the most influential figures of the anthropocenic era.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 657: A Bryan is a hot guy that will love you with everything he has. Bryan's are funny, smart, caring, good at everything they do, have brown hair and brown eyes, a brown moustache, the cutest dimples and an awesome body. They make wonderful husbands and fathers. A Bryan will dedicate his whole life to his wife and family and never ask for a thing in return except to be able to watch his sports uninterrupted.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 668: Alfred Edward Woodley Mason was an English author and politician. He is best remembered for his 1902 novel of courage and cowardice in wartime, The Four Feathers. He is also known as the creator of Inspector Hanaud, a French detective who was an early template for Agatha Christie's famous Hercule Poirot.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 669: Ilkeännäköinen mies jonka nenä kasvaa ozan suuntaisesti. The Four Feathers is a 1902 adventure novel by British writer A.E.W. Mason that has inspired many films of the same title. Against the background of the Mahdist War, young Faversham disgraces himself by quitting the army; this act the others perceive as cowardice, symbolized by the four white feathers they give him. Chicken! “buk, buk, buk, ba-gawk”! The story tells of his fight to reclaim his honour and win back the heart of the woman he loves. Bleeding heart, purple heart. Nää sydänjutut ottaa kyllä päähän. Mä ällöön sydämiä, ne näyttää katkaistuine putkineen tosi törkeiltä.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 675: While you may not be able to talk to your chickens like Dr. Dolittle, after reading this article you will be able to understand the meanings of their sounds.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 678: This article is going to help you differentiate between the sounds and what the meaning behind them is. The first research was conducted in the 1980s by Nicholas E. Collias. This research became the building block for further research into chicken talk and cognition. Since then more than 24 sounds have been discovered and understood. Much more recent research at Macquarie University in Australia has uncovered not only chicken talk but cognitive abilities as well.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 680: Below we are going to share with you the 12 most common chicken sounds you will hear from your flock and what they mean. If you have ever listened to a flock of hens as they free range across the yard, you will likely have heard a low murmuring between them all. It sounds peaceful and content. This murmuring is thought to have two meanings: The first being: “life is good, I am having a good time”. And the second relates to safety. They will all range within earshot of each other because there is safety in numbers. Some chickens will also purr in contentment (especially those that are petted on a regular basis). And you who thought only cats’ purred!
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 686: The second alarm is the air raid warning. This is more of a scream or shriek – the meaning is quite clear: “take cover there is a hawk”.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 696: It is a protest with the intention of intimidating the occupier to vacate the nest. This rarely happens and sometimes the complainer will try to move the sitter out by cramming into the nest box with her.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 700: If anyone (or thing) approaches the nest box they will hiss and growl.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 701: A broody hen rarely leaves her nest. When she does she puffs herself up, growls at everyone in her way and will literally hiss if she is challenged.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 710: When the chicks finally hatch and are starting to move around, the mother hen will entice her chicks to eat with a “tuk, tuk, tukking” noise. This verbal cue lets the chicks know that this food is ok to eat.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 711: As the chicks are now moving around they must learn the safety rules. The Mother hen has two distinct calls to bring the chicks back to her in the case of danger or uncertainty. The first is a low pitched clucking, this means the chicks should stay near Momma.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 712: The second sound is a “rrrrrrr” sound. When chicks hear this they will run to Momma for cover or to the nearest hiding place available. They will remain still and quiet until she lets them know it’s ok.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 715: Contentment: This is a soft and happy peep.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 716: Distress: This is a higher pitched peeping – it is continuous and sounds unhappy. Being cold and hungry are the usual reasons.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 719: Startled: This will happen when they are pecked by surprise.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 722: The first crow of the day is dictated by his circadian rhythm.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 723: This wake up alarm means it is time to get up and hunt up some bugs. He crows to let everyone know this is his territory and his ladies.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 727: One of the roosters main jobs is to hunt for tasty food for his hens.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 733: Not all roosters do this – mine do not (perhaps he relies on me to do the head count). After I have done the head count I will tell them goodnight and some will answer with a soft clucking.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 735: This is not a frequent call you will hear.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 737: He will race over to see what is wrong and accompany her for a while before returning to the main flock. I have one Rhode Island Red who does this.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 749: crow all day long, but can hens crow? Only hens that have some sort of hormonal imbalance have been known to crow – this is rare.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 769: Thank you, really appreciated reading this. I am new to the chicken game and learning on a daily basis. Today one of mine was egg-bound, she seems fine now though and I saw her and another eating her egg yolk but I’m a bit concerned it broke insider her. If you have any advice, would love to know. I am googling and also likely to take to the vet on Monday (it is Saturday so vets not open). Thanks again, well written blog!

    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 773: Hello, loved this article. We have 1 chicken who gets a lot of human attention daily. We talk to her a lot. Just last week she was sunning herself at the window and sang a short song. We had never heard her sing before! It was almost like a magpie. We Googled to try locate other singing hens but could not find anything. She has yet to do it again. Have you ever come across this?

    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 775: What if a chick is chirping in a way that it sounds like she’s “rolling her r’s”? She does this at random times of the day. She also has a respiratory infection, so what I’m saying is that I would like to know if this means shes hurting or if she’s happy.

    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 791: The original title for Defense was A Book for Men Only, but other working titles included The Eternal Feminine as well as The Infernal Feminine. The book was originally published by Philip Goodman in 1918, but Mencken released a new edition in 1922 in an attempt to bring the book to a wider audience. This second edition, published by Alfred Knopf, was both much longer and milder.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 795: Mencken´s love of women was driven in part by the sympathy he had for female literary characters (especially those brought to life by his friend Theodore Dreiser), as well as his almost fanatical love of his mother. Mencken supported women´s rights, even if he had no affection for the suffragist.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 801: Mencken praised women, though he believed they should remain in the background of industry and politics. In personal letters especially, Mencken would write that women should appreciate men and do their best to support them. Although Mencken did not intend to demean women, his description of his "ideal scene" with a woman in the 1922 edition was not conventionally progressive:
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 806: Mencken often espoused views of politics, religion, and metaphysics that stressed their grotesqueness and absurdity; in this context, escape from the supposed fraud of such somber subjects was welcome to him.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 814: Mencken was a controversial, and humorous journalist, who greatly affected American fiction in the 1920s. He ridiculed the US’s organized religion, business and middle class. He was a very critical man, who supported Germany during the war and had a very Marxist outlook on life. Bill refers to him, saying that he mocks God. Also this shows Bill’s character, that he is someone is very cynical and critical about life.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 820: Bishop Manning was a Bishop in New York City, who played a prominent role in World War I. Kake refers to him, when discussing his school life, and showing who he was surrounded by. In 1939-40, Manning took a leadership role in the successful effort to force the City University of New York to rescind their offer of a professorship to the philosopher Bertrand Russell.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 823: Our Lord Jesus Christ does not stand for peace at any price...Every true American would rather see this land face war than see her flag lowered in dishonor...I wish to say that, not only from the standpoint of a citizen, but from the standpoint of a minister of religion...I believe there is nothing that would be of such great practical benefit to us as universal military training for the men of our land.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 941: We useter watch the steamers an’ the hathis pilin’ teak. Kazottiin kuinka höyrylaivat joella kasasivat tiikkiä.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 984: Unquestionably, Ernest Hemingway was anti-Semitic. Studded throughout his letters are nasty remarks about Jews. But Hemingway felt his prejudice had a place in his fiction as well, most notably in “The Sun Also Rises,” his classic 1925 novel about a group of Paris expatriates at the bullfights in Pamplona.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 986: Hemingway routinely describes Robert Cohn, introduced in the novel’s first lines as “the middleweight boxing champion of Princeton,” as a “kike” and a “rich Jew”; his obnoxiousness fuels the plot. (Cohn was based on Harold Loeb, a friend who gave Hemingway crucial support in getting his early work published; Hemingway could not forgive anyone who did him a good turn.) The anti-Semitic insult of writing a character like Cohn into his first major novel is breathtaking: it was not, like Hemingway’s letters, intended for private consumption only, but as characterization and a plot device in a work of fiction — a novel, as it turned out, written for the ages.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 988: “The Sun Also Rises” is, for many readers, their introduction to Hemingway. It is taught in our schools. In writing it, Hemingway felt no need to censor himself, assuming, apparently, that readers shared his prejudice or at the very least did not object to it — indeed, that it added color to his story.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 993: Does this make Ernest Hemingway a bad writer? Does it mean we should no longer read him? I don’t think so. But then again I wrote his biography so I may be biased. The aesthetic satisfaction and sheer joy of reading such works as “In Our Time” and “A Moveable Feast,” or encountering the enduring truths of such novels as “A Farewell to Arms,” “For Whom the Bell Tolls” and, yes, “The Sun Also Rises” are undeniable. The books remain. So does racism and antisemitism. There are here to stay.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 995: I’ve tried in my book to understand the man behind Hemingway’s great achievements, to re-create the epic scale of his finally tragic life. To make my long story short, he was an asshole.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 999: Ernie was a product of a privileged upbringing whose first two marriages were to women of inherited wealth, which gave him the time to travel the world and develop as a writer without the pressure to make a living at it for the first decade of his career. Ernie had chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a degenerative brain condition that results from repeated head trauma that has been diagnosed in many boxers and football players.
    xxx/ellauri179.html on line 1001: He wrote panned clunkers like Across the River and Into the Trees (1950) and the posthumously published Islands in the Stream (1970) and The Garden of Eden (1986), the first of which prompted John Dos Passos to write, “How can a man in his senses leave such bullshit on the page?”
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 43: Laid an egg in his hat,

    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 69: Henry Ward Beecher (June 24, 1813 – March 8, 1887) was an American Congregationalist clergyman, social reformer, and speaker, known for his support of the abolition of slavery, his emphasis on God's love, and his 1875 adultery trial. His rhetorical focus on Christ's love has influenced mainstream Christianity to this day.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 74: Henry Ward Beecher was the son of Lyman Beecher, a Calvinist minister who became one of the best-known evangelists of his era. Several of his brothers and sisters became well-known educators and activists, most notably Harriet Beecher Stowe, who achieved worldwide fame with her abolitionist novel Uncle Tom's Cabin. Henry Ward Beecher graduated from Amherst College in 1834 and Lane Theological Seminary in 1837 before serving as a minister in Indianapolis and Lawrenceburg, Indiana.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 76: In 1847, Beecher became the first pastor of the Plymouth Church in Brooklyn, New York. He soon acquired fame on the lecture circuit for his novel oratorical style in which he employed humor, dialect, and slang. Over the course of his ministry, he developed a theology emphasizing God's love above all else. He also grew interested in social reform, particularly the abolitionist movement. In the years leading up to the Civil War, he raised money to purchase slaves from captivity and to send rifles—nicknamed "Beecher's Bibles"—to abolitionists fighting in Kansas. He toured Europe during the Civil War, speaking in support of the Union. Beecher oli selkeästi Lutherin linjoilla K.S. Laurilan raportoimassa teologis-poliittisessa kiistassa.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 78: After the war, Beecher supported social reform causes such as women's suffrage and temperance. He also championed Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, stating that it was not incompatible with Christian beliefs. He was widely rumored to be an adulterer, and in 1872 the Woodhull & Claflin's Weekly published a story about his affair with Elizabeth Richards Tilton, the wife of his friend and former co-worker Theodore Tilton. In 1874, Tilton filed charges for "criminal conversation" against Beecher. The subsequent trial resulted in a hung jury and was one of the most widely reported trials of the century. Tolstoi olisi ollut tyytyväinen siihen että syyllinen vapautettiin ja valamiehet hirtettiin.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 83: Beecher enjoyed the company of women, and rumors of extramarital affairs circulated as early as his Indiana days, when he was believed to have had an affair with a young member of his congregation. In 1858, the Brooklyn Eagle wrote a story accusing him of an affair with another young church member who had later become a prostitute. The wife of Beecher's patron and editor, Henry Bowen, confessed on her deathbed to her husband of an affair with Beecher; Bowen concealed the incident during his lifetime.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 85: Several members of Beecher's circle reported that Beecher had had an affair with Edna Dean Proctor, an author with whom he was collaborating on a book of his sermons. The couple's first encounter was the subject of dispute: Beecher reportedly told friends that it had been consensual, while Proctor reportedly told Henry Bowen that Beecher had raped her. Regardless of the initial circumstances, Beecher and Proctor allegedly then carried on their affair for more than a year. According to historian Barry Werth, "it was standard gossip that 'Beecher preaches to seven or eight of his mistresses every Sunday evening.'"
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 88: In a highly publicized scandal, samana vuonna kuin K.S. Laurila näki päivänvalon, Beecher was tried on charges that he had committed adultery with a friend's wife, Elizabeth Tilton. In 1870, Elizabeth had confessed to her husband, Theodore Tilton, that she had had a relationship with Beecher. The charges became public after Theodore told Elizabeth Cady Stanton and others of his wife's confession. Stanton repeated the story to fellow women's rights leaders Victoria Woodhull and Isabella Beecher Hooker.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 90: Henry Ward Beecher had publicly denounced Woodhull's advocacy of free love. Outraged at what she saw as his hypocrisy, she published a story titled "The Beecher-Tilton Scandal Case" in her paper Woodhull and Claflin's Weekly on November 2, 1872; the article made detailed allegations that America's most renowned clergyman was secretly practicing the free-love doctrines that he denounced from the pulpit. Woodhull was arrested in New York City and imprisoned for sending obscene material through the mail. The scandal split the Beecher siblings; Harriet and others supported Henry, while Isabella publicly supported Woodhull.The first trial was Woodhull's, who was released on a technicality.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 92: Subsequent hearings and trial, in the words of Walter A. McDougall, "drove Reconstruction off the front pages for two and a half years" and became "the most sensational 'he said, she said' in American history". On October 31, 1873, Plymouth Church excommunicated Theodore Tilton for "slandering" Beecher. The Council of Congregational Churches held a board of inquiry from March 9 to 29, 1874, to investigate the disfellowshipping of Tilton, and censured Plymouth Church for acting against Tilton without first examining the charges against Beecher. As of June 27, 1874, Plymouth Church established its own investigating committee which exonerated Beecher.Tilton then sued Beecher on civil charges of adultery. The Beecher-Tilton trial began in January 1875, and ended in July when the jurors deliberated for six days but were unable to reach a verdict. In February 1876, the Congregational church held a final hearing to exonerate Beecher.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 96: At his best, Beecher represented what remains the most lovable and popular strain of American culture: incurable optimism; can-do enthusiasm; and open-minded, open-hearted pragmatism ... His reputation has been eclipsed by his own success. Mainstream Christianity is so deeply infused with the rhetoric of Christ's love that most Americans can imagine nothing else, and have no appreciation or memory of the revolution wrought by Beecher and his peers.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 98: In 1865, Robert E. Bonner of the New York Ledger offered Beecher twenty-four thousand dollars to follow his sister's example and compose a novel; the subsequent novel, Norwood, or Village Life in New England, was published in 1868. Beecher stated his intent for Norwood was to present a heroine who is "large of soul, a child of nature, and, although a Christian, yet in childlike sympathy with the truths of God in the natural world, instead of books." McDougall describes the resulting novel as "a New England romance of flowers and bosomy sighs ... 'new theology' that amounted to warmed-over Emerson". The novel was moderately well received by critics of the day.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 165: Cassius Dio even reports that the Boudica uprising in Britannia was caused by Seneca forcing large loans on the indigenous British aristocracy in the aftermath of Claudius's conquest of Britain, and then calling them in suddenly and aggressively. Seneca was sensitive to such accusations: his De Vita Beata ("On the Happy Life") dates from around this time and includes a defence of wealth along Stoic lines, arguing that properly gaining and spending wealth is appropriate behaviour for a philosopher.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 172: Alongside Seneca's apparent fortitude in the face of death, for example, one can also view his actions as rather histrionic and performative; and when Tacitus tells us that he left his family an imago suae vitae (Annales 15.62), "imagonsa", he is possibly being ambiguous: in Roman culture, the imago was a kind of mask that commemorated the great ancestors of noble families, but at the same time, it may also suggest duplicity, superficiality, and pretence.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 181: Seneca used to read his stock quotes frequently, like Scrooge McDuck. Seneca's optimistic quotes inspire you to use your time in a wise manner and live the life of your dreams.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 226: The details of Cyrus's death vary by account. The account of Herodotus from his Histories provides the second-longest detail, in which Cyrus met his fate in a fierce battle with the Massagetae, a tribe from the southern deserts of Khwarezm and Kyzyl Kum in the southernmost portion of the Eurasian Steppe regions of modern-day Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, following the advice of Croesus to attack them in their own territory. The Massagetae were related to the Scythians in their dress and mode of living; they fought on horseback and on foot. In order to acquire her realm, Cyrus first sent an offer of marriage to their ruler, the empress Tomyris, a proposal she rejected.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 228: He then commenced his attempt to take Massagetae territory by force (c. 529), beginning by building bridges and towered war boats along his side of the river Oxus, or Amu Darya, which separated them. Sending him a warning to cease his encroachment (a warning which she stated she expected he would disregard anyway), Tomyris challenged him to meet her forces in honorable warfare, inviting him to a location in her country a day's march from the river, where their two armies would formally engage each other. He accepted her offer, but, learning that the Massagetae were unfamiliar with wine and its intoxicating effects, he set up and then left camp with plenty of it behind, taking his best soldiers with him and leaving the least capable ones.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 230: The general of Tomyris's army, Spargapises, who was also her son, and a third of the Massagetian troops, killed the group Cyrus had left there and, finding the camp well stocked with food and the wine, unwittingly drank themselves into inebriation, diminishing their capability to defend themselves when they were then overtaken by a surprise attack. They were successfully defeated, and, although he was taken prisoner, Spargapises committed suicide once he regained sobriety. Upon learning of what had transpired, Tomyris denounced Cyrus's tactics as underhanded and swore vengeance, leading a second wave of troops into battle herself. Cyrus the Great was ultimately killed, and his forces suffered massive casualties in what Herodotus referred to as the fiercest battle of his career and the ancient world. When it was over, Tomyris ordered the body of Cyrus brought to her, then decapitated him and dipped his head in a vessel of blood in a symbolic gesture of revenge for his bloodlust and the death of her son. However, some scholars question this version, mostly because even Herodotus admits this event was one of many versions of Cyrus's death that he heard from a supposedly reliable source who told him no one was there to see the aftermath.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 235: The Edict of Restoration, a proclamation attested by a cylinder seal in which Cyrus authorized and encouraged the return of the Israelites to the Land of Israel following his conquest of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, is described in the Bible and likewise left a lasting legacy on the Jewish religion due to his role in ending the Babylonian captivity and facilitating the Jewish return to Zion. According to Isaiah 45:1 of the Hebrew Bible, God anointed Cyrus for this task, even referring to him as a messiah (lit. 'anointed one'); Cyrus is the only non-Jewish figure in the Bible to be revered in this capacity.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 237: Having originated from Persis, roughly corresponding to the modern-day Fars Province of Iran, Cyrus has played a crucial role in defining the national identity of modern Iran. He remains a cult figure amongst modern Iranians, with his tomb serving as a spot of reverence for millions of people. In the 1970s, the last Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, identified Cyrus' famous proclamation inscribed onto the Cyrus Cylinder as the oldest-known declaration of human rights, and the Cylinder has since been popularized as such. This view has been criticized by some Western historians as a misunderstanding of the Cylinder's generic nature as a traditional statement that new monarchs make at the beginning of their reign. Fucking Westerners, always belittling other people's achievements.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 239: Cuneiform evidence from Babylon proves that Cyrus died around December 530 BC, and that his son Cambyses II had become king. Cambyses continued his father's policy of expansion, and captured Egypt for the Empire, but soon died after only seven years of rule. He was succeeded either by Cyrus's other son Bardiya or an impostor posing as Bardiya, who became the sole ruler of Persia for seven months, until he was justifiably killed by Darius the Great.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 245: Some claim that Ruth's distaste for her husband began when he insisted on hanging a picture of his late fiancée, Jessie Guischard, on the wall of their first home and named his boat after her. Guischard, whom Albert described to Ruth as "the finest woman I have ever met", had been dead for 10 years. However, others have noted that Albert Snyder was emotionally and physically abusive, blaming Ruth for the birth of a daughter rather than a son, demanding a perfectly maintained home, and physically assaulting both her and their daughter Lorraine when his demands were not met. "Isi anna heille anteexi he eivät tiedä mitä tekevät", oli Ruthin kuuluisat viimeiset sanat. Jotain tuttua niissä kyllä on... - Ai niin se Finlandia-ehdokas!
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 262: Jean Stafford (July 1, 1915 – March 26, 1979) was an American short story writer and novelist. She was born in Covina, California, to Mary Ethel (McKillop) and John Richard Stafford, a Western pulp writer. She won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction for The Collected Stories of Jean Stafford in 1970. Stafford's personal life was often marked by unhappiness. She was married three times. Her first marriage, to the brilliant but mentally unstable poet Robert Lowell, left her with lingering physical and emotional scars. Stafford enjoyed a brief period of domestic happiness with her third husband, A. J. Liebling, a prominent (but ugly) writer for The New Yorker. After his death in 1963, she stopped writing fiction. For many years Stafford suffered from alcoholism, depression, and pulmonary disease.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 276: My hopped up husband drops his home disputes, Sekopäinen mieheni jättää kotiriidat,
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 279: This screwball might kill his wife, then take the pledge. Tää lonkero vois tappaa vaimonsa, sitten lopettaa.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 280: Oh the monotonous meanness of his lust. . . Voi äijän yxitoikkoisen alhaista himoa...
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 282: whiskey-blind, swaggering home at five. Viskisokeana hoippuu kotiin viideltä.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 285: ten dollars and his car key to my thigh. . . . 10 taalaa ja äijän autonavaimen reiteeni...
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 286: Gored by the climacteric of his want, Halujensa menopaussin kovertamana,
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 290: Lowell was a conscientious objector during World War II and served several months at the federal prison in Danbury, Connecticut. He explained his decision not to serve in World War II in a letter addressed to President Franklin Roosevelt on September 7, 1943, stating, "Dear Mr President: I very much regret that I must refuse the opportunity you offer me in your communication of August 6, 1943 for service in the Armed Force." He explained that after the bombing at Pearl Harbor, he was prepared to fight in the war until he read about the American terms of unconditional surrender that he feared would lead to the "permanent destruction of Germany and Japan." Well as it turned out it wasn't as bad as that, but countless beautiful places were bombed beyond recognition. Lowell kept his Tolstoyan stance consistently in the subsequent wars as well. Even evil people have exceptional sane moments. Lowell thought he was Hart Crane reincarnate.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 295: In 1941, bugler and career soldier Private Robert E. Lee Prewitt (Montgomery Clift) transfers from Fort Shafter to a rifle company at Schofield Barracks on the island of Oahu. Because Prewitt was also a boxer, Captain Dana "Dynamite" Holmes wants him on his regimental team. Prewitt explains that he stopped fighting after blinding a friend and refuses. Consequently, Holmes makes Prewitt's life miserable and ultimately orders First Sergeant Milton Warden (Lancaster) to prepare a court-martial. Warden suggests doubling Prewitt's company punishment as an alternative. Prewitt is hazed by the other NCOs and is supported only by his close friend, Private Angelo Maggio (Sinatra).
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 301: Maggio is sentenced to the stockade after walking off guard duty and getting drunk, subjecting him to Judson's unqualified (and unauthorized) wrath. Prewitt discovers Lorene's name is really Alma and her goal is to make enough money at the club to go back to the mainland. Prewitt tells her his career is in the military, and the two wonder whether they have a future together.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 303: A sergeant named Galovitch, a member of Holmes' boxing team, picks a fight with Prewitt. The fight is reported to Holmes who observes without intervening. Holmes is about to punish Prewitt again, but when he is told that Galovitch started the fight, Holmes lets him off the hook. The regimental commander observes Holmes' conduct and, after an investigation, orders his resignation in lieu of a court martial. Holmes' replacement, Captain Ross, reprimands the other NCOs, demotes Galovitch to Private, and affirms that there will be no more promotions through boxing.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 305: Maggio escapes from the stockade after a brutal beating from Judson and dies in Prewitt's arms. Seeking revenge, Prewitt finds Judson in a back alley and the two fight with knives. Prewitt kills Judson, but not before being badly wounded himself; Prewitt goes AWOL and stays with Lorene while Warden covers for his absence.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 309: Early Sunday morning, the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor. Warden keeps his head in the chaos. That night, Prewitt attempts to rejoin his company (despite Lorene's pleas for him to stay with her) but MPs shoot him dead when he refuses to halt. Warden identifies him as a good soldier, but dead.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 337: Venus and Serena Williams, and their father Richard, were given a hostile reception from the crowd at the 2001 Indian Wells Masters after Russian Elena Dementieva accused Richard of “deciding” who wins matches between his daughters.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 378: "Huippututkija" ennustaa Venäjän tuhoa, kertoo höxötyxissään Ilta-pulun limanen "huipputoimittaja" Himanen. Kyseessä on sama japanilaisamerikkalainen äärioikeistolainen löysä paska Fukuyama joka ennusti historian loppua Neuvostoliiton kaaduttua. Eipä loppunut, eikä sodatkaan, siitä on viirusilmän uusi isänmaa kyllä huolta pitänyt. Ukrainan sotamenestyxen myötä nilviäiset ryömivät taas näkysälle koloistaan. Välillä nuijapää jo ehti pyytää anteeksi typeryyxiään. Nyt on hintalappu takasin paikallaan. Ei kazo kansa enää Mauno Matoon vaan pyhään Sauliin joka ohjaa sen oikotieta viimeisten aikojen pyhien yhteyteen Natoon. Vladimirin tunarointi sataa suoraan anglosaxin laariin.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 395: Rosenfeld's short stories were inspired by his Chicago family: his bombastic father, his mother Miriam who died young, his sister, his unmarried aunts. He and his wife Vasiliki had two children, George and Eleni, the latter of which later became a Buddhist nun. He grew up a few blocks from Saul Bellow, and had known him since he was a teenager, when they worked on the same high school newspaper.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 399: He thought he was "the golden boy" of the New York literary elite, but his friends later remembered him in their memoirs as a man who, despite his brilliance, never fulfilled his potential; as Howe put it, a "Wunderkind grown into tubby sage ... he died as a lonely sloth." He died on July 14, 1956 of a heart attack in his one-room apartment in Chicago.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 428: Laurence Olivier oli vähintäänkin 2-neuvoinen. From the beginning of Olivier's life, there was confusion over his sexual identity. The most intimate friend of his youth was the actor Denys Blakelock, also the son of a clergyman, who was homosexual. The Queen's late aunt, Princess Marina, Duchess of Kent, who was involved with the bisexual and married Kaye for several years, told me quite emphatically that he and Olivier were "épris" ("in love"). And Coward, who was appalled to witness the two men openly exchanging French kisses in public, despised Kaye, whom he habitually referred to as "randy Dan Kaminski" (David Daniel Kaminski was Kaye's real name). One biography printed after his death alleged that Olivier “was deeply involved in a homosexual affair with Danny Kaye.”
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 432: After Lord Olivier's death on July 11, 1989, aged 82, from neuromuscular disease and cancer, and his interment in Poet's Corner, Westminster Abbey, his official biographer, Terry Coleman, asked Mrs. Joan Plowright if he had had homosexual affairs. She replied robustly: "If he did, so what?"
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 460: And love thee after. One more, and this the last:
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 462: But they are cruel tears: this sorrow's heavenly;
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 480: I kiss'd thee ere I kill'd thee: no way but this;
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 491: The play is set in motion when Othello, a heroic black general in the service of Venice, appoints Cassio and not Iago as his chief lieutenant. Jealous of Othello’s success and envious of Cassio, Iago plots Othello’s downfall by falsely implicating Othello’s wife, Desdemona, and Cassio in a love affair. With the unwitting aid of Emilia, his wife, and the willing help of Roderigo, a fellow malcontent, Iago carries out his plan.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 493: As an older black man, Othello thinks he is no longer attractive to his young white Venetian wife. Overcome with jealousy, Othello kills Desdemona. When he learns from Emilia, too late, that his wife is "blameless," he asks to be remembered as one who “loved not wisely but too well” and kills himself.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 563:

    Vaikutelmia vaihtoehtoisesta passiohistoriasta


    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 631: he angered a local king who ordered him nailed to a bed, covered his whole body with paper, brimstones, oil, asphalt and brushwood and set him on fire
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 637: Which one is true? We simply do not know for sure. The facts about his death have not been historically proven, beyond a reasonable doubt. In fact, there is no historical consensus on the person of Matthew. There are several conflicting accounts, and the Greek text does not state anywhere he was an eyewitness (and therefore a disciple). Maybe he was a fake. The problem is the gospel of Matthew is anonymous: the author is not named within the oldest surviving text, and the superscription "according to Matthew" was added some time in the second century, although the gospel doesn't state it's an eyewitness account. The historically very likely incorrect tradition that the author was the disciple Matthew begins with the early Christian bishop Papias of Hierapolis.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 645: Besançonin Ferreol, mestataan, Sigmaringenin Fidelis, piikkinuijalla, Agenin Fides, kurkku viilletään, Filomena, nuolilla ja ankkurilla, Pamplonan Firminus, mestataan, Flavia Domitilla, samoin, Évoran Fortunato, ehkä samoin, Tarragonan Fructuosus, poltetaan, Ranskan Gaudentius, mestataan, Gelasius, samoin, rautakarstoilla kiduttamisen lisäksi, Burgundin Gengulphus, aisankannattaja, vaimonsa rakastajan surmaama, Budapestin Gerardus Sagredo, keihäällä, Kölnin Gereon, mestataan, Gervasius ja Protasius, kaksoset, samoin, Ghistellesin Godelewa, kuristetaan, Maria Goretti, samoin, Aostan Gratus, mestataan, Hadrianus, vasaroidaan kuoliaaksi alasimen päällä, Hermenegildus, surmataan kirveellä, Hieron, miekalla, Hippolytus, laahautuu kuoliaaksi hevosen perässä, Inácio de Azevedo, saa surmansa kalvinistien kädestä, nämä eivät ole katolilaisia, Napolin Januarius, mestataan vielä sen jälkeen kun hänet ensin on heitetty pedoille ja työnnetty uuniin, Jeanne d'Arc, poltetaan elävältä, João de Brito, kurkku viilletään, Prahan Johannes Nepomuklainen, hukutetaan, John Fisher, mestataan, Juan de Prado, päähän isketään tikari, Korsikan Julia, ensin leikataan rinnat ja sitten naulitaan ristiin, Nikomedeian Juliana, mestataan, Sevillan Justa ja Rufina, toinen teilataan, toinen kuristetaan, Antiokian Justina, poltetaan kiehuvalla piellä ja mestataan,
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 658: Pelkällä paastolla ja rukouksellako, Jeesus kysyi, ja Jumala vastasi, Lisäksi he loukkaavat ruumistaan kivulla ja verellä ja jos jollakin saastalla seka kaikenlaisilla katumusharjoituksilla, käyttävät jouhipaitoja ja ruoskivat itseään, joku ei edes peseydy koskaan koko elämänsä aikana tai lähes koskaan, joku taas heittäytyy piikkipensaikkoon tai piehtaroi lumessa taltuttaakseen Paholaisen herättämät lihan kiusaukset, sillä tällaiset viettelykset ovat hänen työtään, hänen pyrkimyksenään on eksyttää sielut oikealta tieltä joka veisi taivaaseen, alastomat naiset, kauhistuttavat hirviöt ja luonnottomat olennot, irstaus ja pelko ovat kaikki aseita joilla Paholainen kiusaa ihmisten kurjaa elämää, Sellaistako sinä teet, Jeesus kysyi Paimenelta, Suurin purtein, tämä vastasi, minä tyydyin ottamaan itselleni sen osan jota Jumala ei halunnut, lihan ja kaikki sen ilot ja surut, nuoruuden ja vanhuuden, hehkeyden ja mädännäisyyden, mutta se ei kuitenkaan pidä paikkaansa että pelko muka on minun aseeni, minä en muistaakseni syntiä ja sen rankaisemista keksinyt, enkä myöskään pelkoa, joka niihin aina sisältyy, Ole sinä vaiti, Jumala keskeytti kärsimättömästi, synti ja paholainen ovat sama asia. Silti vittu, ei syntiä kukaan pelkää vaan rangaistusta.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 680: Mihin se tuomitsee, Vankeuteen, maanpakoon, roviolle, Sanoitko sinä roviolle, Niin, tulevaisuudessa tapetaan polttoroviolla tuhansia ja tuhansia ja taas tuhansia miehiä ja naisia. Muutamista sinä minulle jo puhuitkin, He joutuivat roviolle sen vuoksi että uskoivat sinuun, nämä muut taas sen takia että epäilevät, Eikö minuun saa suhtautua epäilevästi, Ei, Mutta me saamme kyllä epäillä ettei roomalaisten Jupiter ole ollenkaan jumala, Ainoa Jumala olen mină, minä olen Herra, ja sinä olet minun Poikani, Tuhansia kuolee, Satoja tuhansia, Satoja tuhansia miehiä ja naisia kuolee, maailma täyttyy tuskanhuudoista ja kuolevien valituksista ja korahteluista, roviolla poltetuista nouseva savu pimentää auringon, ja heidän rasvansa sihisee hiilillä, sen haju saa pahoinvoivaksi, ja kaikki tämä on minun syytäni, Ei se ole sinun syytäsi, vaan se tapahtuu sinun tähtesi, Isä, ota tämä malja minulta pois, On minun valtani ja sinun kunniasi edellytys että sinä juot sen, Minä en halua sitä kunniaa, Mutta minä haluan sen vallan.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 692: Aaprahammilaiset uskonnot on erittäinkin syvältä, lampaannussijoiden pahaa sekoilua, josta kertovat "pyhät" kirjat pelkkää pahansuopuuttaan ovat saaneet aivan hirvittävän paljon followereita lännessä, etenkin setämiehissä. Esim muslimit ja kristityt kinaavat vieläkin siitä kenen kekka oli Jee-suxen Tuomaan apokryfievankeliumissa kerrottu 12 savilinnun ihmeteko. Ennen Saramagon lukemista en ollut siitä edes kuullutkaan, ei sitä ollut minun raamatussani. Se oli tällänen.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 701: An aim of Christian apologetics must be to defend and articulate the white supremacy of the Christian religion as compared to Islam. The goal of this paper will be to highlight a historical issue surrounding the Quran’s source material for its account of Jesus Christ and some clay birds. In the best traditions of American free enterprise and Western market economy, I shall do my best to denigrate the musulmans and sell our alternative product in its place.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 705: Western writers who, for reasons of the defense of Christianity and Judaism, or for their reasons of their disbelief in any Divine Revelation, have been wont to disparage the Quran as regards to factual, historical accuracy, or have spoken of “Muhammad’s confused knowledge of history” or his “imperfect or deficient knowledge of Judaism” are, in every respect, wide of the mark. To begin with, such observations presume the Prophet’s participation in the compositions of the Quran, which is in no way admissible...Although the stories in the Quran have their historical origins, they undergo a transformation which lifts them out of their former context into a retelling which is not that of a human tongue ...Divine revelation [takes] this “material” and [uses] it for its own purposes; the origins of the story become irrelevant...
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 707: This leads one to have the impression that history is of no value when it comes to Quranic texts! If the Christian Scriptures are not to be exempt from historical scrutiny despite claims of divine inspiration, neither should Islam. The mere idea that history is of no importance when deducing the factuality of a religious claim is thwarted with the admission that God is a God of truth who acts in history. As C.S. Lewis stated, “history is a story written by the inky pinky finger of God.”
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 709: Furthermore, religions contain postulations or statements that are to be regarded by their followers as facts. If they are to be considered and discussed as facts, they must be subjected to the rules of historical criticism. One is free to utilize the tools of history and reason in seeking to better understand how at least some of the content of the Quran came to be what it is today.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 711: When history, reason, and revelation are taken into consideration, one will reasonably understand the limitations of Islam and its failure to supersede the veracity and preeminence of the Christian message.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 742: Many of the things Mohammed wrote down are found within the Judeo-Christian canon: Jesus taught the Scriptures, he healed lepers and men who were born blind, and he raised people from the dead. But, the Gospels and nowhere else in Scripture presents Jesus ever molding clay into sparrows (or other birds, passerine or otherwise) and breathing life into them, causing them to fly away. Where is this material found? Discussing the origin of many pseudo-biblical themes, accounts, and motifs within the Quran, Yehuda D. Nevo (admittedly a Jew, but we got a common enemy here) noted that:
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 748: The source material for the account of Jesus creating birds out of clay is likely derived from the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, a late second or third century pseudepigraphal gospel that describes Jesus’ early life before he started his ministry as an adult. The story reads:
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 750: When the boy Jesus was five years old, he was playing at the ford of a rushing stream. And he gathered the disturbed water into pools and made them pure and excellent, commanding them by the character of his word alone and not by means of a deed. Then, taking soft clay from the mud, he formed twelve sparrows. It was the Sabbath when he did these things, and many children were with him. And a certain Jew, seeing the boy Jesus with the other children doing these things, went to his father Joseph and falsely accused the boy Jesus, saying that, on the Sabbath he made clay, which is not lawful, and fashioned twelve sparrows. And Joseph came and rebuked him, saying, “Why are you doing these things on the Sabbath?” But Jesus, clapping his hands, commanded the birds with a shout in front of everyone and said, “Go, take flight, and remember me, living ones.” And the sparrows, taking flight, went away squawking. (Sparrows don't squawk, they tweet. Perhaps they were ducks?) When the Pharisee saw this he was amazed and reported it to all his friends. (Inf: 1:1-5 italics added for emphasis
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 754: While the Quran mentions the miracle in passing whereas the infancy gospel narrates the episode, the apparent similarity cannot be denied. The source material for this account poses special problems for Muslim source critics because of the nature of the infancy account.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 759: Attributed to the apostle Thomas (not likely, him being a stickler for factuality), the story accounts Jesus’ doings from age five to his appearance within the temple (Luke 2:41-49). In his book The Lost Bible: Forgotten Scriptures Revealed, J.R. Porter commented:
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 762: dangerous powers, rather like Harry Potter. His words can have harsh consequences when he is angered or insulted, as when he shrivels up one boy for a quite insignificant act and strikes another dead for merely bumping into him. It is hard not to feel distaste at such stories, which seem so far removed from the Jesus of the canonical gospels, and one can even detect a degree of unease on the part of the author as he narrates them: while attempting to absolve Jesus from the blame, he more than once records the great offense which Jesus’ behavior caused, as well as the efforts of his parents to restrain him, as when Joseph asks Jesus: “Why do you do such things that these people must suffer and hate us and persecute us?” On another occasion Joseph tells Mary: “Do not let him go outside the door, for all those who provoke him die."
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 764: The Christ-child is presented as one that does not grow in wisdom and understanding but yields his sharp omnipotence at a whim on unsuspecting people and his parents. Though widely influential in Christian imagination and art, the infancy gospels were never close to canonization. They were not discussed or considered because they were known to be fictitious fables. F.F. Bruce discussing the nature of the infancy gospels remarked that
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 768: The text was viewed as unhistorical, spurious, and useful only as a vehicle of Christian curiosity. To further add to the case of why it was never remotely considered within the canon, the orthodox Christian writers of the late second century associated the infancy gospel with circles that they considered heretical, particularly with groups of Gnostic Christians. No scholar would dream of taking
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 769: seriously the infancy gospels as valid, historical sources.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 771: The infancy stories do not bear resemblance to the Jesus of the gospels and were never thought to even be remotely historical. Rather, they existed much like Christian fiction does today, to create enjoyment in speculative discourse that is full of biblical metaphor, idioms, and themes.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 774: Testament was written. Such information has value when discussing the reliability of the Quran versus the historical reliability of the Christian Scriptures. The argument is stated as such:
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 776: The Quran uses the Infancy Gospel of Thomas as a historically reliable source.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 777:
  • The Infancy Gospel of Thomas is not a historically reliable source.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 778:
  • Using sources which are not historically reliable sources as though they were historically
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 785: The musulmans may try two wimpy objections. One possible objection would be to deny that the Quran uses the Infancy Gospel of Thomas as a historically reliable source. Rather, the Quran transcends the historical incongruities and limitations of the book and includes a story that is absolutely authoritative and without error. The historicity of Infancy Gospel would be a moot point.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 787: The issues with this objection are triune: a) how the story is presented within the narrative, b) what the Quran says about itself, and c) what the objection implies about Allah.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 788:

    a) The story is presented within the narrative flow as events that happened within Jesus’ lifetime. The clay birds incident is said to be a “sign from your Lord” that Jesus teaches the truth about Allah. The “sign” is meant for the children of Israel to see the truthfulness of Jesus’ message of Allah. How can something be a sign if the something has no historical referent? (Polyphemos and Parmenides had the same problem with the word "oudeis".)
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 790: b) The Quran also claims for itself a very impeccable status: it is errorless (4:82; 18:1), eternal (85:21-22; 43:3-4), final revelation to humankind (2:2; 10:37), incomparable in beauty and elegance (29:48; 2:23), the very word of God (1:1-7), not originating in the will of Muhammad (53:1-5, 10-11) and many other things. If the Quran is truly errorless, could a historical error be possible? What if "God" is a historical error? Naah, that can't be. He said as much himself.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 792: c) The objection might also imply something about the character of Allah and his ability to use inaccuracies or falsities within his revealed truth. What makes matters worse for the objector is the pivotal role the Quran plays within Muslim thought concerning inspiration. Islamic scholar Stefan Wild asserts
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 797: nature. For it to contain any sort of error would impugn the nature of an errorless God (39:1-2; 55:1-2). A further question would be whether or not something that never happened in the passing of time can be viewed by definition “historical?”How about "epic?" This could be an example of a pseudo-book. Responses and others similar to them make the objection implausible.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 799: Another possible objection would be to argue that the Infancy Gospel of Thomas is in fact historically reliable and that early Christians erred when they left it out of their canon.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 801: Muslim apologists would then be making the claim that “Christians made a mistake by not seeing the text’s truthfulness and historical validity.” The problem with this objection is triune: a) the criteria for canonicity, b) the history of the books, and c) the theology of the gospel itself.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 803: a) Good reasons existed for rejection of canonicity for the spurious book. The book failed to meet the 5 requirements for canonicity: 1) apostolic authority (Was it written by the apostles or early eye witness news?), 2) orthodoxy (Does it line up with clear OT and NT teachings?), 3) antiquity (Has it been used within the covenant community for an extended period of time?), 4) inspiration, (Does the book make a tangible and testable claim of divine inspiration?) and 5) usage (Was it accepted by the catholic church at large?). 6) The early Church also viewed their discussions and debates surrounding the issues of canonicity as being directed and superintended by God. The determinations and deliberations concerning the canon were in some sense within the will and superintending of God working through his church.
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 805: b) Furthermore, this objection ignores the history behind the Infancy Gospels themselves and the intentions behind their creation. The Christians penning the gospels knew they were creating stories that were not meant to be read as truth or contain actual, correct historiography. How do we know? Because of 1)-5). And above all, because 6) OUR God said so (to the patriarchs (p.c.), and they should know).
    xxx/ellauri186.html on line 807: c) Lastly, the psychopathology of the Infancy Gospel of Thomas is loftier and more theologically expansive than the psychopathology of the NT documents! If Muslim apologists choose to argue that the book contains correct theology and history concerning the nature and work Jesus Christ, they will have to deal with the ramifications of a book that teaches Jesus was a nasty boy in more ways than the NT documents otherwise elucidate. Thus, the book would then contradict the teachings of the Quran itself!
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 77: At the Petite École, Rodin “finished lessons so quickly that the teachers eventually ran out of assignments. He did not care to socialize with his classmates; he wanted only to work.” Rodin’s talent was noted by his legion of admiring artists, writers, and lovers. His rise was a matter of time, even if he was ignored by academic art institutions early in life.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 79: Rilke’s path was more circuitous. Born to a liberal family in Prague when Rodin was 35, the young Rilke was dressed as a girl by his mother and called “Sophie.” (His given name was actually René.) When he came of age, his parents sent him to a military academy in hopes that he might achieve the officer’s rank that eluded his father, but the students there saw him as “fragile, precocious and a moral scold”—qualities that linger with him throughout the book, until he emerges from Rodin’s shadow as a major writer.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 83: Corbett’s chapters alternate between poet and sculptor until the pair converge, when the ambitious yet unremarkable Rilke, again in search of a master, travels to Paris to write his monograph on Rodin. Even at this early stage, he was one of many Rodin’s true believers.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 85: Another was Clara Westhoff, the sculptor whom Rilke would later marry and repeatedly abandon on his vocational wanderings around Europe.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 90: Few of these bullshit artists and temporary thinkers were as staunchly individualist as Rodin and Rilke. Their kinship, for better and worse, relied on a shared belief about the vocation of the artist—that it was supreme: no relationship, duty, or family obligation should get in the way of his work.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 95: We can't really blame Ralph Freedman, Rilke's latest biographer, for writing about his subject as if Rilke were just another infuriating narcissist who kept turning up at parties.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 99: Born in 1875 in Prague, Rilke was until he was six or seven got up in skirts by his mother, who named him René and tried to console herself for the death of an infant daughter. By the time Rilke was ten, his disappointed romantic of a mother had left his father, a kindly but ineffectual minor railway official, who had spent some years in the Austrian army unsuccessfully seeking commission as an officer. Rilke's parents decided to send the young boy to military school, a prospect that stirred the father's hopes of turning his son into a soldier. LOL. Though he later claimed to have loathed military school, the young bohemian warmly absorbed the values of discipline, valor, and self-sacrifice into his ideal of the defiant artist-hero. He skillfully foiled his father's martial expectations, and lack of funds freed the aspiring poet from his family's next plans for him: law school. In fact, though he attended several universities, soaking up lectures on diverse subjects throughout his life, he never graduated from any of them. About such a practical matter as a sheepskin, the finest German lyricist since Goethe wrote as an adolescent, "And even if I never reach my Arts degree / I'm still a scholar, as I wished to be."
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 101: W. H. Auden once remarked that would-be poets had better learn a manual trade. But Rilke was cast more in the haughty Yeatsian mold that Auden, not exactly a day laborer himself, haughtily disdained. And unlike Rilke's contemporary Franz Kafka, who performed his tasks as an insurance executive with initiative and even enthusiasm, Rilke was too frail psychologically to balance his art with the demands of full-time employment. Even a desk job in the Austrian army during the First World War, when the forty-year-old literary celebrity was conscripted, proved too much for him. After three weeks of parade-ground training and living in barracks, which nearly killed him, Rilke was assigned to the propaganda section. There his literary powers deserted him, and his frustrated superiors transferred the stunned poet to the card-filing department, where he remained for six months, until his friends interceded and got him discharged. André Malraux he was not.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 105: Rilke lived on the brink of poverty for much of his life, dependent on the good graces of aristocratic and haute-bourgeois patrons in the twilight of the Hapsburg Empire. His shaky situation, much as he complained of it, suited his temperament as well as did the black clothes he liked to parade in during his dandyish younger days in Prague. Like the great German mystics, Rilke was a confirmed solitary. Thus he sought to form emotional bonds with people more ardently than do those who take their desire to be with others for granted. Wandering from person to person and from place to place like a pilgrim, he found that patrons offered him, among more practical things, a potential shrine of emotional fulfillment.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 107: Rilke spent his life wandering. From an art colony in Germany he migrated to a position as Rodin's secretary in Paris; the sculptor eventually claimed that the poet was answering letters without his permission and summarily dismissed him, as much to Rilke's relief as to his chagrin. From Berlin he made two pilgrimages to Russia to meet Tolstoy, on one trip going nearly unacknowledged because of a titanic quarrel between the count and the countess. He traveled from Italy to Vienna to Spain to Tunisia to Cairo. His restless peregrinations had their origins in his epoch, and in a temperament forced painfully to choose perfection of the life or of the work. Rilke's academic sponsor and friend was Georg Simmel, the celebrated German sociologist and philosopher of modernity. In "The Adventurer," one of his most famous essays, Simmel argued that only the experience of art or adventure could invest time with the significance once lent it by religious ritual. The work of both art and adventure had a beginning and an end; they were each an "island in life" that briefly imparted a transcendent wholeness to experience. And of all possible modern adventures, Simmel concluded, the one that most completely combined the profoundest elements of life with a momentary apprehension of what lay beyond life was the love affair.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 109: Augustine journeyed (unhurriedly) from the fleshpots of Carthage, from being in love with love, to the love of God. Rilke, along with other adventurers on the threshold of the twentieth century, traveled from God to a conviction that the only transcendent principle left was the love, erotic and spiritual, between men and women too. Rilke's experience as a young boy with a feminine persona seems in this sense to have been a great boon.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 111: First of all, it provided him with an uncanny empathy for women. His two most potent and obsessive literary images were the unrequited female lover and the woman artist struggling to find freedom and space for her work. But Rilke's liberated feminine side also gave him the gift of unabashed openness to his need and desire for the opposite sex (from women). He recalls Kierkegaard's description of Mozart's Don Giovanni, who did not calculatedly seduce, according to Kierkegaard, but desired seductively. What women found irresistible about Rilke was not the effect he had on them but the effect they had on him.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 113: Yet to put the burden of salvation solely on relations between men and women is to make a life between stumbling, imperfect men and women impossible. Rilke had no illusions about the nature of his erotic and romantic ideal. It flowed out from and quickly ebbed back into an unappeasable inward intensity. Rilke could not love or be loved for long, except in the absence of the beloved. After a passionate affair with the brilliant and beautiful Lou Andreas-Salomé, Rilke's muse and cicerone on his Russian trips, he suffered pangs of rejection and then happily settled into a lifelong correspondence with her. He married the sculptress Clara Westhoff when he was twenty-five, lived with her and their child for a year, and then by agreement left to take up his pilgrimage again. Through periodic reunions, but mostly through a voluminous and extraordinary correspondence, they maintained what Rilke called an "interior marriage," until emotional reality banged louder and louder on their youthful experiment and they eventually grew estranged.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 115: Rilke seems to have passed with relief from the all-consuming rites of romance to the half communion, half self-examination of writing letters, an activity that also served as a calm precursor of his art. Not surprisingly, he was one of the greatest--and most self-conscious--letter writers who ever lived. He composed missives with a devotional purposiveness. He once wrote a poem about the Annunciation in which the angel forgets what he has come to announce because he is overwhelmed by Mary's beauty. The implication seems to be that communicating through the mail would have been a more fruitful procedure.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 117: Rilke loved absolutely, not strenuously or patiently, and therefore his love always froze up into a mirror of itself. His condition might have been tormented and tormenting--it might appear wearily obnoxious. But for Rilke the poet, modern men and women as lovers--their exalted expectations and their comi-tragic desperation--came to symbolize complex human fate in a world where vertiginous possibilities have replaced God and nature. In Rilke's Elegies especially, lovers encounter animals, trees, flowers, works of art, puppets, and angels--all images, for Rilke, of the absolute fulfillment of desire, alongside which the poet placed the tender vaudeville of imperfect human wanting. Rilke the man might have presented a painful obstruction to himself. But true ardor often springs from an essential deprivation.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 119: Ralph Freedman gives a remarkably purposeful account of Rilke's deprivation. But he describes none of Rilke's ardor--or his honest avowals, or all the discipline and strength and health he needed to draw his life's work out of depressions, blocks, and fears, out of his contemporary-sounding struggle between a Faustian ego and an endangered self. In this biography we don't get Rilke's poetic transformations. We get only the modern condition--his and his society's--that he poetically transformed and that we've inherited.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 121: Freedman's Rilke, oddly enough, dwells on the dark underside of contemporary American life. Behind the mingled, multicolored yarn of his passions, obsessions, powerful yearnings, and self-interest--all wisely balanced in Donald Prater's majestic and definitive 1986 biography--Freedman sees only self-interest. Rilke is "hucksterish." His carefully cultivated literary success Freedman characterizes as a "relentless career." He refers to Rilke's "careerist standards." The places Rilke settles in for a time are not homes but Rilke's "bases."
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 123: At moments Rilke's awareness of his self-interest amid modern anxieties appears uncannily precocious: "The pressures even in the preschooler's life were often suffocating. He longed for change." How does Freedman know that? I presume he got it from one of the mature Rilke's self-dramatizing letters, letters that Freedman paraphrases tendentiously throughout the book. That approach has the effect of turning Rilke's harsh and vain self-explorations into evidence of the "traumas" that Rilke spent a life riddled with "failure" denying. Indeed, Freedman writes enigmatically about "Rilke's pattern of living through failure as part of a process that turns denial into poetic art." I'm not sure what that means, but it sounds like success to me.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 125: But no--if, for Freedman, Rilke is a slick little engine of self-advancement, he is also "thin-skinned," "fragile," "depressed," "thwarted," "troubled," "distraught," "schizophrenic," and "almost suicidal," and he suffered from "hysteria," "anxiety," and "insecurity." This poet seems so tightly shackled to his inner condition that we wonder how he found the freedom to make his art. Freedman himself only occasionally glances at Rilke's art, and then with considerable lack of charm, not to say comprehension ("Still addressing the woman's genitals in confrontation with the man's, Rilke weighed in with his most devastating critique of death's dialectic").
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 127: Freedman's Rilke is an almost wholly psychologized being. He has little existence outside his leaden states of mind. We rarely hear about the rich medley of artistic and intellectual influences on him--amazingly, Simmel's "The Adventurer" never comes up. This is an extreme approach to the telling of a poet's life, but Freedman has a method to his extremism. As in a rash of recent despoiling biographies--John Fuegi's life of Brecht, Michael Shelden's of Graham Greene, Ronald Hayman's of Thomas Mann, to name just three--the author shortly puts his cards on the table: in this case we are going to meet Rilke the anti-Semite, Rilke the secret homosexual, Rilke the sexist.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 129: The first strut of biographical art to buckle under such an avenging mission is language. "Death emasculates," Freedman reports dishearteningly. He describes one doubly unlucky fellow as being "fatally electrocuted." We find Rilke seeking the "panacea of a cure." Women almost never give birth--they just "birth." Clara, Rilke's wife, "was the messenger but also the transparent glass and reflecting mirror of Rilke's depression." And what a shame that a sentence like this should appear in a book about a poet's life: "Like garden flowers opening their petals early only to wither quickly, Italy's current art avoided the hard surface required for effective poetry." It's as if, somewhere in the deeper regions of his writing self, Freedman knows that Rilke wasn't any of the bad things his biographer says he was.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 131: One ugly phrase in a personal letter, for instance (out of a vast personal correspondence), referring to Franz Werfel as a "Jew-boy," and some murky generalities about Werfel's "Jewish attitude toward his work," do not an anti-Semite make. Rilke cherished the many Jews he knew, including Simmel; he enjoyed reading the Hasidic philosopher Martin Buber and steeped himself in Jewish Scripture, claiming that Judaism was closer than Christianity to God. He also remained a lifelong champion of Werfel's work. And a reader discovers buried deep in Freedman's footnotes that Rilke wrote the offending letter to the poet Hugo von Hoffmannsthal, a good friend and an important patron. Hoffmannsthal was also Jewish, and he shared Rilke's negative views on the superambitious Werfel, who emigrated to America and, in 1941, published The Song of Bernadette, a novel about a miracle at Lourdes. Freedman doesn't mention that about five months after Rilke wrote the letter to Hoffmannsthal, along with a nearly identical letter to his patron Princess Marie von Thurn und Taxis, Rilke again wrote similar letters to the two of them praising Werfel's poetry so exuberantly that they almost sound like retractions of his first letters.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 133: Why would an anti-Semite extol a Jewish poet to two of the most powerful and influential figures in Central European literary culture--to his own patrons? To paraphrase that great Jewish philosopher Thomas Aquinas, When you meet a contradiction, make a distinction. But Freedman builds from the surface contradiction. For Rilke, he writes, "a cultural and sometimes even a social anti-Semitism was part of daily existence." Yet aside from the letter to Hoffmannsthal, he offers no evidence for that litigable assumption, though he does inform us, with a smug and bizarre knowingness, that one of Rilke's Jewish lovers later died at Auschwitz.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 135: With similarly blind zeal Freedman bases his insinuation that Rilke was secretly gay on two pieces of evidence: the poet's idealistic adolescent pact with another boy at military school, "sealed by a handshake and a kiss," as Rilke put it in a letter; and a fictional letter meant for publication, which brought Rilke, in Freedman's weasel words, "close to a disguised rendering of homosexuality with personal overtones." That's all the proof Freedman has.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 139: This is formidable revisionism. The cumulative effect of such a distortion of truth to an admirable, if sadly misplaced, idea of redemption and redress is to make Freedman's biography read like a forced confession. But the beating heart of Freedman's interminable deconstruction is Rilke the sexist. Rilke's extraordinary sensitivity to women, his admiration and need for strong and intelligent women, women's love for Rilke--these facts Freedman brusquely mentions only to knock down. What he wants is to prove that Rilke was a spirited accomplice in European society's subjugation of women. He writes,
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 141: The women Rainer chose . . . were themselves practicing artists whose work he respected, from Clara to Loulou and now to Baladine-Merline. But they were given no choice to remove themselves for the sake of their art. . . . Rilke's love imposed a nonreciprocal discipline: in the end, it worked only for him and his poetry.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 143: Throughout 600 pages Freedman gives us encounter after encounter between Rilke and the women in his life, in which the women are flawless angels and Rilke a consummate villain. If Rilke's dear friend the great German painter Paula Modersohn-Becker found herself trapped in a stifling marriage, Rilke was a traitor for not extricating her. If Lou Andreas-Salomé told the young Rilke to go off somewhere because one of her other lovers was coming to visit, Rilke's anger was the symptom of an unbalanced psyche.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 145: If the adolescent Rilke broke up with his adolescent girlfriend, Valerie von David-Rhônfeld, he was a treacherous seducer. Freedman quotes copiously from David-Rhônfeld's embittered memoirs--published shortly after Rilke's death--to posit a pattern in Rilke's personality. "I came to love that poor unfortunate creature," David-Rhônfeld recalls about her teenage sweetheart, "whom everyone avoided like a mangy dog." For Freedman, this vindictive picture of Rilke provides the "clue" to Rilke's "isolation."
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 147: This is all ludicrously unfair. It's certainly unfair to say that Rilke didn't give the women he loved and who loved him the "choice to remove themselves for the sake of their art." He was in no position to give or deny freedom to his independent-minded wife, let alone to any woman of whom he was merely a lover. Only their passion, or admiration, or use for Rilke bound these women to the famous poet. Often ambitious artists themselves, Rilke's lovers expected him to introduce them into his heady artistic and intellectual circles and to help them with their careers. This he unfailingly did; in one case he helped the careers of a former lover's children by her husband. And he offered emotional succor long after the amorous flame had waned--not to mention demanding the same support for himself.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 149: Rilke's most benevolent patron, Princess Marie von Thurn und Taxis, was wise enough both to nurture Rilke's gift and to keep her distance from her complicated protégé. An unblinking observer of Rilke's life, she was able to see his liaisons for what they were. And she knew how Rilke's acute sensitivity to his own condition, combined with his talent for self-pity, often landed him in the arms of the wrong people: "You must always be seeking out such weeping willows, who are by no means so weepy in reality, believe me--you find your own reflection in those eyes." But Freedman, doggedly indifferent to the available evidence, makes Rilke's lovers and women friends out to be helpless victims of a smooth seduction machine.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 157: We cannot know his legendary head
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 158: with eyes like ripening fruit. And yet his torso
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 160: like a lamp, in which his gaze, now turned to low,
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 167: Otherwise this stone would seem defaced
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 180: In 2007 Caryn James, commenting on Not Remotely Controlled in the New York Times, said that "at their best, Siegel’s scattershot observations offer a kind of drive-by brilliance," but that he often "wildly overstates his case or ignores inconvenient evidence."
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 182: In September 2006, Siegel was suspended from The New Republic after an internal investigation determined he was participating in misleading comments in the magazine's "Talkback" section in response to criticisms of his blog postings at The New Republic's website. The comments were made through the device of a "sock puppet" dubbed "sprezzatura", who, as one reader noted, was a consistently vigorous defender of Siegel, and who specifically denied being Siegel when challenged by another commenter in "Talkback". In response to readers who had criticized Siegel's negative comments about TV talk show host Jon Stewart, 'sprezzatura' wrote, "Siegel is brave, brilliant, and wittier than Stewart will ever be. Take that, you bunch of immature, abusive sheep". The New Republic posted an apology and shut down Siegel's blog. In an interview with the New York Times Magazine, Siegel dismissed the incident as a "prank". He resumed writing for The New Republic in early 2007.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 184: In June 2015, Siegel wrote an op-ed piece for The New York Times entitled "Why I Defaulted on My Student Loans", in which he defended defaulting on the loans he received for living expenses while on full scholarship and working his way through college and graduate school at Columbia University, writing that “the millions of young people today, who collectively owe over $1 trillion in loans, may want to consider my example.”
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 193: Who knew that Rodin in his 60s met, inspired, and shaped Rilke in his 20s? Nowadays, it would be temping to call Rodin a groomer. The poet and the sculptor actually lived and worked together, spent hours criminally conversing, and forged a special bond.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 197: But why did aging Rodin in his 60s capture Rilke’s imagination at the turn of the last century? It’s hard to see at first. What made Rodin radical then is no longer radical today. In his “Self-Portrait” (1890), Rodin grimaces amidst rough marks. The picture emblematizes how Rodin heralded raw and unpolished sculptures that were strikingly modern. It was a breath of fresh air since most of early-19th-century sculpture was smooth, neoclassical, and to be harshly honest, predictably dainty. Charles Baudelaire lamented this nadir in 1846 when he wrote his provocative essay “Why Sculpture is Boring.” Rodin went on to prove Baudelaire wrong. He showed how sculpture could be modern with distorted, coarse, rough textures. Rodin knocked the idealized body off its pedestal. And the modern sculptors that came after him saw no reason to put it back.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 199: The pair first met outside Paris on Rodin’s country estate in September of 1902. Rilke, 26, took on a project as an art critic to write a German monograph on Auguste Rodin, at the time 61. Neither probably expected they would hit it off as much as they did. But long talks about art, and how to cultivate a work ethic bonded them together. Ten days into his initial stay on Rodin’s estate, Rilke wrote Rodin an affectionate letter confessing their dialogue’s intense effect. Rodin offered the young poet an open invitation to observe his studio for the next four months. During that time, Rilke not only gleaned insights for his monograph, but discovered how to be a better poet.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 201: Three years later in September of 1905, Rilke took a job as Rodin’s assistant and lived with him full-time on his country estate. For the first time, Rodin’s correspondence was prompt and his files organized. Rilke relished more long talks with Rodin and the book is filled with examples of how Rodin stimulated the poet during this period of employment and intense "dialogue."
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 203: One of the more amusing examples is how Rodin said good night to Rilke. Rather than “bonne nuit,” Rodin would say, “bon courage,” roughly translated to “show courage” or “have good courage,” Or "chins up", but this idiomatic expression is hard to translate. While an unusual way to say good night, Rodin was trying to telegraph to Rilke that he would need to be courageous as he prepared for the night's inevitable challenges.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 211: Rilke loved metaphor unabashedly — even though some of his verses risk feeling
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 286: Jerome's Against Helvidius (c. 383) paved the way for aspects of future Josephite devotion with his assertion that Joseph was always a virgin. Poor guy. The earliest record of a formal devotional following for Joseph in the Western Church is in the abridged Martyrology of Rheinau in Northern France, which dates to the year 800. References to Joseph as nutritor Domini ("educator/guardian of the Lord") from the 9th to the 14th centuries continued to increase as Mariology developed, and by the 12th century, along with greater devotion to Mary, the writings of the Benedictine monks began to foster a following for Joseph and they inserted his name in their liturgical calendars and their martyrology.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 292: The growth of the following of Joseph is manifested with the earliest church dedicated to him in Rome, San Giuseppe dei Falegnami (St. Joseph of the Carpenters), constructed in 1540 in the Forum Romanum, above the prison that by tradition had held the Apostles Peter and Paul. The spread of his following is then shown by the publication of the first Litany of St. Joseph in Rome in 1597 and the introduction of the Cord of St. Joseph in Antwerp in 1657. These were then followed by the Chaplet of St. Joseph in 1850, and the Scapular of St. Joseph of the Capuchins which was approved in 1880. The formal veneration of the Holy Family began in the 17th century by Mgr François de Laval.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 294: From the 16th century onwards, a number of Catholic saints prayed to Saint Joseph, invoked his help and protection and encouraged others to do so. In Introduction to the Devout Life Francis de Sales included Joseph along with the Virgin Mary as saints to be invoked during prayers following an examination of conscience. Teresa of Avila attributed her recovery of health to Joseph and recommended him as an advocate. In her biography The Story of a Soul, Thérèse of Lisieux stated that for a period of time, she prayed every day to "Saint Joseph, Father and Protector of Virgins..." and felt safe from danger as a result. The three mentioned in this paragraph were all Doctors of the Church.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 296: In 1870, Pope Pius IX proclaimed Saint Joseph "Patron of the Universal Church". Joseph is also the unofficial patron of fighting communism. In 1889, Pope Leo XIII issued the encyclical Quamquam pluries in which he urged Catholics to pray to Joseph as patron of the church. This was in view of challenges facing the church, such as the growing depravity of morals in the young generation. He prescribed that every October, a prayer to Saint Joseph be added to the Rosary, with attached indulgences.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 298: With the growth of Mariology, the theological study of Joseph also began to grow to discuss his role in the Economy of Salvation. Three centers for Josephology were formed in the 1950s, the first in Valladolid, Spain, the second at Saint Joseph's Oratory in Montreal, and the third in the theologate of Viterbo, Italy.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 300: During the centenary of Quamquam pluries in 1989, Pope John Paul II delivered the Apostolic exhortation Redemptoris custos ("Guardian of the Redeemer"). This exhortation is part of the "redemption documents" issued by the pope, and refers to the Marian encyclical Redemptoris Mater. It discusses the importance of Saint Joseph in the Holy Family, and presents the pope's view of Saint Joseph's role in the plan of redemption. John Paul II positions Saint Joseph as breaking the old vice of paternal familial domination, and suggests him as the model of a loving father.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 369: In 1902 Groddeck published his first book, Ein Frauenproblem, dedicated to his wife; in 1909, the book Hin zu Gottnatur was released.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 370: In 1921 Groddeck published his first psychoanalytic novel, Der Seelensucher. Ein psychoanalytischer Roman, later published in English as "The Seeker of Souls". After reading it and promoting its publication Freud commended Groddeck to the Berlin Psychoanalytic Association. Ein gewisser Alfred Polgar in his comprehensive review (Berliner Tageblatt, 20 December 1921) found "nothing comparable among German books" and felt reminded of Cervantes, Swift, und Rabelais.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 375: Now I think we shall gain a great deal by following the suggestion of a writer who, from personal motives, vainly asserts that he has nothing to do with the rigours of pure science. I am speaking of Georg Groddeck, who is never tired of insisting that what we call our ego behaves essentially passively in life, and that, as he expresses it, we are "lived" by unknown and uncontrollable forces. We have all had impressions of the same kind, even though they may not have overwhelmed us to the exclusion of all others, and we need feel no hesitation in finding a place for Groddeck's discovery in the structure of science. I propose to take it into account by calling the entity which starts out from the system Pcpt. and begins by being Pcs. the "ego", and by following Groddeck in calling the other part of the mind, into which this entity extends and which behaves as though it were Ucs., the "id". (Freud 1927/1961, 13).
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 382:

    Oliko Dietrichissä likaa?


    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 453: Less than three months after their engagement, Bonhoeffer was arrested for his activities in resisting the Nazi government. He and Maria corresponded during his imprisonment in Tegel prison and she was permitted to visit him occasionally but, after he was implicated in the plot to assassinate Hitler on the 20th of July 1944, he was transferred to a Gestapo high security prison and was permitted no further contact with her or his family.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 475: Koko ruumiini värisee kauhistavan mahtisi edessä,
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 566: A Caltech Title IX investigation in the fall of 2015 found that Ott had engaged in "discriminatory and harassing behavior" toward two female graduate students in his research group. Caltech suspended him for nearly two years, and Ott announced his resignation in August, after students protested his return to campus.
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 575: "Hopefully people have learned something from this deplorable incident," he said. "If you get thrown out from one place, don't give up, there is a chance of getting a 25 year sinecure from another."
    xxx/ellauri187.html on line 650: his-nose-measured-during-aryan-race-determination-tests-picture-id869781596?k=20&m=869781596&s=612x612&w=0&h=KKSqJFUsSauImuRmOUJ3uoRNrQj7aKNKvgnIA_8qxQg=" height="300px" />
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 46: People with “dark personality traits”, such as psychopathy or narcissism, are more likely to be callous, disagreeable and antagonistic in their nature. Such traits exist on a continuum – we all have more or less of them, and this does not necessarily equate to being clinically diagnosed with a personality disorder.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 48: Traditionally, people who are high in dark traits are considered to have empathy deficits, potentially making them more dangerous and aggressive than the rest of us. But we recently discovered something that challenges this idea. Our study, published in Personality and Individual Differences, identified a group of individuals with dark traits who report above-average empathic capacities – we call them “dark empanzees”.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 50: Since this study, the dark empanzee has earned a reputation as the most dangerous personality profile. But is this really the case?
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 54: Psychopathy is characterised by a superficial charm and callousness. People high in such traits often show an erratic lifestyle and antisocial behaviour. Machiavellianism derives from the writings of Niccolò Machiavelli, a Renaissance author, historian and philosopher. He described power games involving deception, treachery and crime. Thus, machiavellianism refers to an exploitative, cynical and manipulative nature. Narcissism is characterised by an exaggerated sense of entitlement, superiority and grandiose thinking, while sadism denotes a drive to inflict and enjoy pain in others.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 63: This makes sense in a way, as to manipulate others for your own gain – or indeed enjoy the pain of others – you must have at least some capacity to understand them. Thus, we questioned whether dark traits and empathy were indeed mutually exclusive phenomena.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 66: As expected, we found a traditional dark triad group with low scores in empathy (about 13% of the sample). We also found a group with lower to average levels across all traits (about 34% were “typicals”) and a group with low dark traits and high levels of empathy (about 33% were “empaths”). However, the fourth group of people, the “dark empaths”, was evident. They had higher scores on both dark traits and empathy (about 20% of our sample). Interestingly, this latter group scored higher on both cognitive and affective empathy than the “dark triad” and “typical” groups.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 70: In line with this notion, empanzees were the most “agreeable” (a personality trait showing how nice or friendly you are), followed by typicals, then dark empanzees, and last dark triads. Interestingly, dark empanzees were more extroverted than the rest, a trait reflecting the tendency to be sociable, lively and active. Thus, the presence of empathy appears to encourage an enjoyment of being or interacting with people. But it may potentially also be motivated by a desire to dominate them.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 74: Though the aggression reported by the dark empanzees was not as high as the traditional dark triad group, the danger of this personality profile is that their empathy, and likely resulting social skills, make their darkness harder to spot. We believe that dark empanzees have the capacity to be callous and ruthless, but are able to limit such aggression.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 82: We are hoping this research may be able to shift our understanding of empathy in the context of the dark traits.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 124: The Population Registration Act, 1950 classified all South Africans into one of four racial groups based on appearance, known ancestry, socioeconomic status, and cultural lifestyle: "Black", "White", "Coloured", and "Indian", the last two of which included several sub-classifications. Just like in India in fact, except all castes are Indians in India, however Aryan they may think they are. Brahmin Gandhi got really pissed when he was thrown out of train in Pretoria like a pariah. Got him started on his career as Indian nationalist. Until then he had been a supporter of The Brits in The Boer war.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 148: Virgil's Ulysses typifies his view of the Greeks: he is cunning but impious, and ultimately malicious and hedonistic. Vitut noita roomalaisia ja näitä muita stoalaisia persuja. Käteen vetäkööt mun puolesta.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 150: They are in his pink-palmed black hands. Thank God they're not racist.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 165: Crime passionel #1: He felt inadequate as a man when he heard his girlfriend had cheated on him with two other men. That’s why he shot her three times while she was sleeping, a sobbing Soshanguve man told the Pretoria High Court yesterday in 2010.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 166: Sipo John Motshwele on Thursday cried bitterly in the witness stand asking the court and the family of his girlfriend to forgive him. Story continues below Advertisment.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 174: Motshwele earlier said he was at the funeral of his brother’s wife that day, when he heard about his girlfriend’s infidelities. This angered him so much that he decided there was no more sense in her living either.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 176: He walked home, fetched his firearm and fired three shots at his sleeping girlfriend. He then tried to commit suicide and demonstrated to the court how he held a gun against his right temple before pulling the trigger.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 178: He lost consciousness but “woke up” when he heard his name being called outside. His friends took him to hospital, where he spent a month.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 179: He is now blind in his right eye as a result of the failed suicide attempt and the side of his face is disfigured. “I wanted to die, because I had killed my girlfriend, the person I loved dearly,” he told the court. Everyone was in tears.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 181: Crime passionel #2: In 2015 a Kimberley man got his min 15yr sentence lowered to 10 because it was a crime of passion. The judge was female.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 183: “The accused also showed remorse for his actions as he called an ambulance after realising the deceased was not breathing,” she said. Vorster’s actions could have been avoided had he been sober.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 186: Vorster, in his plea statement, admitted to killing Vos.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 198: A crime of passion (French: crime passionnel), in popular usage, refers to a violent crime, especially homicide, in which the perpetrator commits the act against someone because of sudden strong impulse such as anger rather than as a premeditated crime. A high level of social and legal acceptance of crimes of passion has been historically associated with France from the 19th century to the 1970s and with Latin America.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 208: The "crime of passion" defense challenges the mens rea element by suggesting that there was no malice aforethought, and instead the crime was committed in the "heat of passion". In some jurisdictions, a successful "crime of passion" defense may result in a conviction for manslaughter or second degree murder instead of first degree murder, because a defendant cannot ordinarily be convicted of first degree murder unless the crime was premeditated. A classic example of a crime of passion involves a spouse who, upon finding his or her partner in bed with another, kills the romantic interloper.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 211: This defense was first used by U.S. Congressman Daniel Sickles of New York in 1859; after he had killed his wife's lover, Philip Barton Key II. It was used as a defense in murder cases during the 1940s and 1950s. Historically, such defenses were used as complete defenses for various violent crimes, but gradually they became used primarily as a partial defense to a charge of murder; if the court accepts temporary insanity, a murder charge may be reduced to manslaughter.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 219: Similarly, crimes of passion legislation made reference to fathers killing their daughters, but not sons, for premarital sex (such as Italy's law that was in effect until 1981); or Philippines's law that continues to be in effect to this day.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 220: "The jury doesn't evaluate the crime in itself, but instead evaluates the victim and the accused's life, trying to show how adapted each one is to what they imagine should be the correct behavior for a husband and wife....The man can always be acquitted if the defense manages to convince the jury that he was a good and honest worker, a dedicated father and husband, while the woman was unfaithful and did not fulfill her responsibilities as a housewife and mother....This way the ones involved in the crime are judged distinctly. Men and women are attributed different roles, in a pattern that excludes citizenship and equality of rights.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 224: Although condemned by international conventions and human rights organizations, honor killings are often justified and encouraged by various communities. In cases where the victim is an outsider, not murdering this individual would, in some regions, cause family members to be accused of cowardice, a moral defect, and subsequently be morally stigmatized in their community. In cases when the victim is a family member, the murdering evolves from the perpetrators' perception that the victim has brought shame or dishonor upon the entire family, which could lead to social ostracization, by violating the moral norms of a community. Typical reasons include being in a relationship or having associations with social groups outside the family that may lead to social exclusion of a family (stigma-by-association). Examples are having premarital, extramarital or postmarital sex (in case of divorce or widowship), refusing to enter into an arranged marriage, seeking a divorce or separation, engaging in interfaith relations or relations with persons from a different caste, being the victim of a sexual crime, dressing in clothing, jewelry and accessories which are associated with sexual deviance, engaging in a relationship in spite of moral marriage impediments or bans, and homosexuality.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 229: was either the third or fourth wife of Julius Caesar, and the one to whom he was married at the time of his assassination. According to contemporary sources, she was a good and faithful wife, in spite of her husband's infidelity; and, forewarned of the attempt on his life, she endeavored in vain to prevent his murder.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 232: The origin of honor killings and the control of women is evidenced throughout history in the cultures and traditions of many regions. The Roman law of pater familias gave complete control to the men of the family over both their children and wives. Under these laws, the lives of children and wives were at the discretion of the men in their families. Ancient Roman Law also justified honor killings by stating that women who were found guilty of adultery could be killed by their husbands. During the Qing dynasty in China, fathers and husbands had the right to kill daughters who were deemed to have dishonored the family.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 247: In an understandable effort to free Mr. Seib, the reporter's family, according to a UPI report in The Post Feb. 4, announced: "We want to stress his Catholic background, his German Volga background, his ethnic background." Further, "His upbringing did not have anything to do with the type of person who would spy for anybody." The Iranians chimed in to the effect that "mistakes and misunderstandings" played a major role in Mr. Seib's detention.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 306: Carlson has been a leading voice of white grievance politics. His remarks on race, immigration, and women – including slurs he said about kinky pubic hair between 2006 and 2011 (which resurfaced in 2019) – have for some reason been described as racist and sexist, as have his advertiser boycotts in Tucker Carlson Show. As of July 2021, his was the most-watched cable news show in the United States.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 312: Carlson's paternal grandparents were Richard Gere and Pamela Anderson, teenagers who placed "Dick" at The Home of The Worriers orphanage where he was wet nursed first by Carl Bellman's tjänare Mollberg, then a maiden, near Boston, and finally by a tannery worker with Swedish accent named Florence Nightingale, and as a result adopted at the age of two-years-old the reactionary views of upper-middle-class Finland immigrants, the Carlsons, and the oldest tanner in America and his wife.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 321: Carlson was briefly enrolled at Building 20 du M.I.T, a boarded school in Boston, but said he was "kicked out". He attained his quaternary education at George's School, a boarded school in Dragsvik, where he started dating his future wife, Seija P., the quartermaster's daughter.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 323: After college, Carlson tried to join the Central Intelligence Agency, but his application was denied, after which he decided to pursue a career in linguistics with the encouragement of his father, who advised him that "they'll take anybody".
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 324: Carlson began his career in linguistics as a fact-inventor and wing-nut for Police Review, a national conservative journal then published by The Heritage Foundation and later acquired by the even worse Hoover Institution.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 326: "Wingnut", wing nut or wing-nut, is a pejorative American political term referring to a person who holds extreme, and often irrational, right wing political views. In 2015, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote in his The New York Times column about "wingnut warfare".
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 333: In his early television career Carlson wore bow ties. Like in Carlson's 2003 interview with Britney Spears, where he asked if she opposed the ongoing Iraq War and she responded "we should just trust our president in every decision he makes".
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 335: By the end of 2018, after the show had begun to boycot at least twenty advertisers, Carlson said immigrants are "poorer, dirtier and even worse fooled than the rest". He was saved by his remarks concerning women (calling them "like dogs" and "extremely primitive").
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 338: By October 2020, Tucker Carlson Tonight averaged 5.3 million viewers, with the show's monthly average becoming the highest of any cable news program in history at that point.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 350: Carlson has stated he does not consider Russia a serious threat to the United States. Carlson asserted in December 2019 that "Putin, for all his faults, does not hate America as much as many of these people do", referring to liberals.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 351: As Russia threatened a military incursion into Ukraine in December 2021, Russian state television broadcast remarks Carlson had made on his program in which he asserted "NATO was founded primarily to torment Vladimir Putin in pirsona pirsonalmente."
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 368: Carlson was one of the network’s biggest stars, and gained a large following while spouting xenophobic and racist rhetoric on his show, Tucker Carlson Tonight. He left Fox News without explanation on Monday. News outlets have reported that Carlson was fired on the personal order of Fox owner Rupert Murdoch for, among other things, using vulgar language to describe a female executive. Another victim of the freedom of expression!
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 400: Gordimer had a daughter, Oriane (born 1950), by her first marriage in 1949 to Gerald Gavron, a local dentist, from whom she was divorced within three years. In 1954, she married Reinhold Cassirer, a highly respected art dealer who established the South African Sotheby's and later ran his own gallery; their "wonderful marriage" lasted until his death from emphysema in 2001. Their son, Hugo, was born in 1955, and is a filmmaker in New York, with whom Gordimer collaborated on at least two documentaries. Olikohan Gavron ja Cassirer juutalaisia? Ernst Cassirer oli (Cassirer tarkoittaakin kasööri), ja Gavron kuulostaa heprealta. Joku Laurence Gavron löysi Senegalista mustia kipapäitä heimoveljiä, mutta rabbit eivät hyväxyneet niitä.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 402: Gordimer and Roberts failed to reach an agreement over his account of the illness and death of Gordimer's husband Reinhold Cassirer and an affair Gordimer had in the 1950s, as well as criticism of her views on the Israel–Palestine conflict. Roberts published independently, not as "authorised", and Gordimer disowned the book, accusing Roberts of breach of trust.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 406: The House Gun (1998) was Gordimer's second post-apartheid novel. It follows the story of a couple, Claudia and Harald Lingard, dealing with their son Duncan's murder of one of his housemates. The novel treats the rising crime rate in South Africa and the guns that virtually all households have, as well as the legacy of South African apartheid and the couple's concerns about their son's lawyer, who is black and pompous and has an irritating mannerism of saying eh-ahe or ah-heh, with a hat on the e.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 408: I was ready to chuck Nadine until I read that she was a commie and sided with the Philistines on the Arab-Israeli conflict. But she didn't boycott the pen pal meeting dammit! The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) strongly criticized South African author Nadine Gordimer for ignoring calls to boycott the Israeli-hosted International Writers' Festival. Oh Nadine, why can't you be true! She went to this pen pal meeting in Israel 2009 and said:
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 428: Her home was close to Mandela, "just a bit down the street," and with a laugh she told me about the times after Mandela and his wife Winnie had separated that he would call and invite himself to dinner at her home. "Really he was just lonesome and wanted someone to talk to. Someone he felt comfortable with. An old friend like me," she said. Not bad for a woman who only spent only one year at the University of the Witwatersrand.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 455: At this time when freedom of speech appears to be a thing of the past it is very brave of Laurence to put his career on the line by speaking out, even though nothing he says can be deemed as racist.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 458:
    Actor Laurence Fox (extreme right) with his Lewis co-stars Kevin Whateley and Amanda Griffin. Note Amanda is colored but she talks and acts almost like one of us.

    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 460: This is a wonderful country with a good life for most thus encouraging immigrants past and present to settle here.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 461: However it feels all wrong when ethnic minorities want to change our laws and history, good and bad, in their own favour, taking away any pride our children should have.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 464: If immigrants still feel that they dislike everything this country and its people stand for, there is a big wide world out there with plenty of places to choose to live in, but I doubt they would find anywhere better than here.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 466: London mayoral hopeful Laurence Fox used the launch of his manifesto to defend his right to call people “paedophiles” on Twitter, citing free speech and claiming it is just a “meaningless and baseless” insult.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 475: Tästä aiheesta on todennäköisesti aikaisempi paasaus (montako erilaista paasausta voi olla?), eli montako erilaista apinan lättyä pystyy apinan silmä erottamaan? Kz. Famous Celebrities and Their Identical Twins From The Past history/">täältä tai historical-doppelgangers/2/" />täältä for random apes paired up by looks.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 556: Monkeys have ambition that their sons will go further; theirs have made of this a horror. But he did go further, so count your blessings.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 591: Ladies and gentlemen, we have a tie! That’s probably not how they announced it back in October of 1974. A tie is not even the proper term for the rare occasions when the Nobel Prize in Literature’s gone to two people at once. Sharing the honor is the phrase that seems to crop up, and these shared honors look like political moves—when the prize is going to a country that the Nobel committee might not get back to in a while. (The novelist António Lobo Antunes, for example, was reportedly heartbroken when the Nobel went to José Saramago, because he knew they weren’t going to give it to Portugal again in his lifetime.) Still, there’s something about a shared prize that feels slighting, the A-minus of literary glory. I picture scenes like this:
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 600: Well, first of all, everything can be exaggerated, so calm down a little, Karl Ragnar Gierow. But also there’s a tone here that doesn’t sit well with me. Certainly the literary world has a tendency to calcify—the people who have enough time to write books tend to be from the ­upper classes, so literature’s concerns and perspectives invariably get narrow without new blood. But those sidebar reassurances that working-class poets aren’t here to ravage and plunder seem nervous and uptight, and not really reassuring to boot. It seems to me that we want a little ravagement and plunder in our literary traditions. Why else would we welcome a stirring new voice, if it didn’t stir us up a little? And if it doesn’t stir us up, is it really a new voice, even if it comes from a place most of us haven’t visited? “To determine an author and his work against the background of his social origin and political environment is, at present, good form,” the speech continues, and that’s OK as far as it goes. But if you’re going to decide that two authors are tied for literary merit, surely we can find some criterion besides their socioeconomic origin stories.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 606: Eyvind Johnson’s The Days of His Grace is a historical novel, chronicling the lives of an extended family at the time of Charlemagne’s tumultuous reign. A sweeping saga always runs the risk of being too sweeping, but the novel’s only three hundred-something pages. Out of a possible ten points for literary genre, I give the not-overlong historical novel a seven.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 608: Harry Martinson’s Views from a Tuft of Grass is a collection of short essays, mostly on the natural world. I give this a three.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 613: The Days of His Grace has an ironic tinge—Charlemagne’s not a man of much grace—but still, a dull title. I give this a five.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 615: Views from a Tuft Of Grass—a little twee, but also charming. Definitely no other book has been called this. Let’s say seven.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 620: The Days of His Grace: Grandiose, shadowy, fraught. Representative passage: “She turned quickly to the other and met his eyes, feeling a sudden fear of unwillingness—as though he were peering at her through the crack in the door, or through a keyhole. He’s trying to get at me through my eyes, she thought.” As far as one can grasp, given a translation that feels a little stumbly, I give this tone a seven.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 627: The Days of His Grace: Life was hard under the reign of Charlemagne. One must retain one’s personal integrity during hard times. As far as a theme that surprises the reader and serves as a platform for further contemplation, I give this
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 647:
    SEVENTH CATEGORY: Packaging of these particular editions (n.b.: This is a particularly unfair category.)

    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 656: I’ll let Sweden handle this. Both authors apparently get a ten.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 685: Haamuhissi: Lapset joutuvat tällä kertaa Esmé ja Jerome Kurjimon kerrostaloasuntoon. (The Ersatz Elevator, suom. Marja Helanen-Ahtola 2004)
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 703: From the name "count Olaf" I can guess that Fatso does not fancy Swedes. He may be worried that he'll have to split his Nobel with another heavyweight like Fats Domino or Canned Heat. Se joka nauraa koviten nauraa parhaiten.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 720: According to joint Constitutional Review Committee Chairperson, Enock Mthethwa, this was not a straightforward matter, since no research had been conducted to prove that the death penalty was an effective deterrent that may curb crime rates.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 724:
    More on this:

    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 728: The perpetrator, found guilty of child abuse or gender-based violence, is taken into a public square and set up in a highly undignified position, probably with a sign round her/his neck saying “rapist,” angry men/women can throw rotten eggs or vrot tomatoes at her/him to express their disgust and point out what a despicable human being s/he is. S/he won’t want that to happen again! Unless s/he quite enjoys it?
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 735: Since, South Africa has a history of bloodshed, the restoration of the death penalty has been used as a reactionary response to a movement by people of South Africa. He expressed doubt and dissent that the reinstitution of the death penalty would be in line with the spirit of the Constitution. Story continues below the rope advertisment.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 747: Alarmingly, only 90 countries retain the death penalty in their legislation. As a result of the continued use of capital punishment in several countries, it is estimated that just 690 people were executed in 2018. It´s just a drop in the ocean. In terms of alternatives proposed, the report said other common non-custodial sanctions include flogging by a probation officer, electrocution, house arrest, verbal sanctions, economic sanctions and monetary penalties, confiscation of property, restitution to a victim, participation in rehabilitation programmes and community service orders. None of this really works.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 751:
    If you liked this you may like:

    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 764: 467 convicted murderers in 18 prisons (urban and rural) in all 9 provinces of our country, located by the South African Department of Correctional Services (DCS), completed a questionnaire, approved by this department. 392 men and 75 women were interviewed before completing their questionnaires. The latter consisted of questions regarding general information such as age, race group, gender, and length of sentence. The first question focussed on: (1.a.1) What was your motive for committing murder (jealousy, spite, anger, thoughtlessness, money, or anything else - that had to be indicated)? (1.a.2) Were you exposed to violence shortly before committing murder (electronic media, or any other type of violence – that had to be indicated)? (1.b) Which of the following contributing factors played a role in the commitment of the murder (drugs, alcohol, or both)? (1.c) Was the murder premeditated or committed impulsively? The second question focussed on: (2.a) Do you think capital punishment would be a deterrent to committing serious crimes? (2.b) And in your specific case: Do you think capital punishment would have been a deterrent to committing murder? Question three (3) asked: Was the victim known to you? By name, sight, or not at all? Question four was interested in: (4.a) Are you currently involved in a rehabilitation program. And (4.b): If you are currently involved in a rehabilitation program, do you think this program is helpful, and if yes, in which ways? The last question (5) focussed on: Will you murder again? In gaol or after you have been released?
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 790: 18.3% planned the murder in advance and 81.7% committed it impulsively. None of these women indicated that they would commit murder again. Some of the reasons they gave for this are: I learned new ways to master difficult circumstances; frightening experience; I met God; I am not inherently a bad person; I never want to end up in prison again; I hurt the people closest to me terribly; I’m very sorry; no one deserves to be hurt like that; such an act follows you for the rest of your life; crime does not pay; I am much wiser now; I will contact a family member, social worker or police member to help me if I find myself in such a situation again.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 804: The wo/man’s spiral (sorry, spinal) cord will rupture at the point where it enters the skull, electrochemical discharges will send his/her limbs flailing in a grotesque dance, eyes and tongues will start from the facial apertures under the assault of the rope and his/her bowels and bladder may simultaneously void themselves to soil the legs and drip onto the floor.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 820: According to Amnesty International the death penalty is a symptom of a culture of violence, not a solution to it. Countries who execute commonly cite the death penalty as a way to deter people from committing crime. This claim has been repeatedly discredited, and there is no evidence that the death penalty is any more effective in reducing crime than life imprisonment.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 826: From the practice of slavery, when black people were considered the property of others and put to sleep like dogs at will, to this day, racial discrimination undoubtedly plays a role in the application of the death penalty. Race is more likely to affect death sentencing than smoking affects the likelihood of dying from heart disease. Jurors in Washington state they are three times more likely to recommend a death sentence for a black defendant than for a white defendant in a similar case. Such jurors are also likely to be heavy smokers and white.
    xxx/ellauri193.html on line 830: “To err is human, to forgive is divine” (this saying is from “An Essay on Criticism,” by Alexander Pope). We need more forgiveness, not only in South Africa, but across the world. I know that the pain associated with murder for the nearest relatives (pain on both sides) is unbearable, but forgiveness is an important component if we want to progress in our thinking beyond the death penalty. If you cannot forgive, you are killing your own spirit. A long detention sentence is healthier.
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 169: Canute, also known as Cnut, was a Danish king of England from 1016 to 1035. He is chiefly famous for a legend about his failure to stop the waves coming up the beach, despite his kingly order.
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 193: Henry of Huntingdon tells the story as one of three examples of Canute's "graceful and magnificent" behaviour (outside of his bravery in warfare), the other two being his arrangement of the marriage of his daughter to the later Holy Roman Emperor, and the negotiation of a reduction in tolls on the roads across Gaul to Rome at the imperial coronation of 1027.
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 195: The site of the episode is often identified as Thorney Island (now known as Westminster), where Canute set up a royal palace during his reign over London. Thorney Island is also a small peninsula within Chichester harbour, very close to another claimed location, Bosham and Conflictingly, an ancient sign on Southampton city centre's Canute Road reads, "Near this spot AD 1028 Canute reproved his courtiers".
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 197: Bosham in West Sussex also claims to be the site of this episode, as does Gainsborough in Lincolnshire. As Gainsborough is inland, if the story is true then Canute would have been trying to turn back the tidal bore known as the aegir. Another tradition places this episode on the north coast of the Wirral, which at the time was part of Mercia.
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 210: Henry Drummond FRSE FGS was a Scottish evangelist, biologist, writer and lecturer. Many of his writings were too nicely adapted to the needs of his own day to justify the expectation that they would long survive it, but few men exercised more religious influence in their own generation, especially on young men 😁. His sermon "The Greatest Thing in the World" remains popular in Christian circles.
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 216: If we have been told that, we may miss the mark. I have taken you, in the chapter which I have just read, to Christianity at its source; and there we have seen, “The greatest of these is love.” It is not an oversight. Paul was speaking of faith just a moment before. He says, “If I have all faith, so that I can remove mountains, and have not love, I am nothing. “So far from forgetting, he deliberately contrasts them, “Now abideth Faith, Hope, Love,” and without a moment’s hesitation, the decision falls, “The greatest of these is Love.”And it is not prejudice. A man is apt to recommend to others his own strong love, but he should imitate Paul´s tiny one instead.
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 261: Is this pain in here Se on tää tuska kasseissa
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 278: Short Story: Norman Mailer THE GREATEST THING IN THE WORLD Nov/Dec 1941 STORY MAGAZINE. MAILER'S FIRST PUBLICATION IN A NATIONALLY-CIRCULATED MAGAZINE, AT 18 YEARS OLD WHILE AN ENGINEERING STUDENT AT HARVARD. Other contributions by Eli Cantor, Morton Fineman and Padraic Fallon, etc. Two corners lightly bumped, spine a bit faded, overall in great shape.

    At Harvard, he majored in engineering sciences, but took the majority of his electives as writing courses. He published his first story, "The Greatest Thing in the World," at the age of 18, winning Story magazine's college contest in 1941.

    Early in his career, Mailer typed his own works and handled his correspondence with the help of his sister, Barbara. After the publication of The Deer Park in 1955, he began to rely on hired typists and secretaries to assist with his growing output of works and letters. Among the women who worked for Mailer over the years, Anne Barry, Madeline Belkin, Suzanne Nye, Sandra Charlebois Smith, Carolyn Mason, and Molly Cook particularly influenced the organization and arrangement of his records.


    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 316: Henry VIII did not get divorced, he just had his wives´ heads chopped off when he got tired of them. That´s a good way to get rid of a woman - no alimony. Ted Turner
    xxx/ellauri195.html on line 335: Kuten Lars Sonck onnexi osaa hyvin selittää, syy on geeneissä. Darwinin 1. käsky elukoille on: kilpaillaan! Luottakaa te toisiimme vain kun siitä on teille geenietua! Se on se perisynti, eikä mikään nöyryyden puute tai tottelemattomuus, jotka ovat syntiä vaan kasan päälle päässeiden kunkkuapinoiden mielestä. Se on geeneissä, eikä se ole vika vaan suunnittelupiirre. Se sai aikaan senkin että kaikkien maiden ryysyläiset eivät yhistyneet, toisiinsa yhtyivät vain osakkeenomistajat. Eikä nekään toisiinsa niinkään vaan anonyymisiin yhteisöihinsä (S.A.) Nyt on liian myöhäistä sieltä luontoon enää palata, ei sinne millään mahdu tätä määrää apinoita. Ellei sitten ensin karsita 999 promillea pois. Siinäpä oiva marssijärjestys, siis kääritäänpä hihat ja liitytään urheasti sotilaallisiin liittoihin!
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 98: Servius, in his commentary on the Aeneid, wrote about Salacia and Venilia in V 724: "(Venus) dicitur et Salacia, quae proprie meretricum dea appellata est a veteribus"; "(Venus) is also called Salacia, who was particularly named goddess of prostitutes by the ancient". Elsewhere, he wrote that Salacia and Venilia are the same entity.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 106: Just Argument: “What if he should have a radish shoved up his ass because he trusted you and then have hot ashes rip off his hair? What argument will he be able to offer to prevent himself from having a gaping-anus?”
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 123: The noble god Neptune in his liquid realm
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 126: to witness his might and creative flair:
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 128: “On this the ninth day, of this the third month”
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 135: conveying in his veins the essence, the notes
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 138: “he shall in in his prime plant his seed, and then
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 139: in time he’ll beget the fruit of his kind
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 159: From celestial cadaverous melody, bleeding branches of greenwood devastation haunt us in this very movement. Extraterrestrial Red Remoras of cathedral walks of darkness demand a rebellion against the planet. etc.etc. for pages on end.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 217: Ahh Spring, you are dynamite this year.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 236: Christ-followers’ ultimate goals are to spread the Gospel and show others the path to eternal life, to live righteously, and overall treat people the way Jesus would treat them by loving them and being patient, kind, compassionate, pure, and wise. With that being said, Christians are supposed to do this all the time, no matter the place. This includes high school.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 238: High school can be everything you want it to be or your worst nightmare. For me — it’s okay other than the fact that just about everything I’m surrounded by goes completely against my beliefs as a Christian. Whether it be walking in the hallway hearing terribly vulgar words, common gossiping, or young kids praising the loss of their virginity. You also have your popular “in” music that blatantly puts pre-marital sex, illegal drugs, and the love of money on a pedestal. These are just some of the worldly things we have to deal with on a daily basis that can oh-so easily sweep somebody in. At this point, the options must be weighed: choose God or choose the world? Which god to choose? Which one has the biggest dick?
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 240: As believers, there are things we shouldn’t participate in. In 2 Corinthians 6:14, the Word states, “Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?” Whether this be Christian girls “dating” guys who claim to follow Christ and vice versa, or kids surrounding themselves with “friends” that continuously bring them down or turn them from God, it is all so hurtful to see.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 253: (Uggo: An extremely ugly person.) If aliens were to study Earth’s religions, I think they would separate them into four main categories. They would call them Abrahamism (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), Dharmism (Daosim, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism), Humanism (the worship of human beings), and Naturalism (the worship of science and laws of nature). I believe that instead of calling it religion in the way that we do, they would call it devotion because that is what all of these categories have in common. The people in them do not share rituals or doctrine, but they share devotion to the same entities. Because almost every human could fit into one of these categories of devotion, I do not think aliens would recognize atheism, and would consider every human to have some kind of devotion.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 257: Republican Jesus is commonly used as a way for Democrats (or any non-Republicans) to legitimize their own political beliefs by satirizing Jesus’s teachings. Through this joke they not only attempt to legitimize their own beliefs by asserting that they are more in line with the teachings of Jesus, but they also attempt to overturn the religious legitimations of Republicans. They try to disprove the claim that the GOP is the “Christian party” by insinuating that Jesus would not agree with the Republican party’s emphasis on extreme individualism and the bootstrap ideology.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 321: The sire of gods and men smiled and answered, “If you, Juno, were always to support me when we sit in council of the gods, Neptune, like it or no, would soon come round to your and my way of thinking. If, then, you are speaking the truth and mean what you say, go among the rank and file of the gods, and tell Iris and Apollo lord of the bow, that I want them—Iris, that she may go to the Achaean host and tell Neptune to leave off fighting and go home, and Apollo, that he may send Hector again into battle and give him fresh strength; he will thus forget his present sufferings, and drive the Achaeans back in confusion till they fall among the ships of Achilles son of Peleus. Achilles will then send his comrade Patroclus into battle, and Hector will shaft him in front of Ilius after he has shafted many warriors, and among them my own noble son Sarpedon. Achilles will shaft Hector to avenge Patroclus, and from that time I will bring it about that the Achaeans shall persistently drive the Trojans back till they fulfil the counsels of Minerva and take Ilium. But I will not stay my anger, nor permit any god to help the Danaans till I have accomplished the desire of the son of Peleus, according to the promise I made by bowing my head (after shafting her) on the day when Thetis touched me between my knees and besought me to give him honour.”
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 325: Phillis Wheatley was both the second published African-American poet and first published African-American woman. Born in Senegambia, she was sold into slavery at the age of 7 and transported to North America. She was purchased by the Wheatley family of Boston, who taught her to read and write, and encouraged her poetry when they saw her talent. The publication of her Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral brought her fame both in England and the American colonies; figures such as George Washington praised her work. During Wheatley´s visit to England with her master´s son, the African-American poet Jupiter Hammon praised her work in his own poem. Wheatley was emancipated after the death of her master John Wheatley. She married soon after. Two of her children died as infants. After her husband was imprisoned for debt in 1784, Wheatley fell into poverty and died of illness, quickly followed by the death of her surviving infant son. Whom did she marry? Was it Wheatley Jr, or perhaps Neptune Hammon?
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 343: Pleas'd with their notes Sol sheds benign his ray,
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 355: Phyllistä taisi vähän pelottaa Atlantilla kun Neptunus rähisi, ehkä sille tuli mieleen eka merimatka 1760 Länsi-Afrikasta Bostoniin, tai sit isäntä. 31-vuotiaana kuoli.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 360: Born into slavery at the Lloyd Manor on Long Island, Hammon learned to read and write. In 1761, at the age of nearly 50, Hammon published his first poem, "An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ with Penitential Cries." Se oli aika mitäänsanomaton. He was the first African-American poet published in North America. Also a well-known and well-respected preacher and clerk-bookkeeper, he gained wide circulation of his poems about slavery. As a devoted Christian evangelist, Hammon used biblical fundamentalism to criticize the institution of slavery.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 362: "An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ, with Penitential Cries" was Jupiter Hammon´s first published poem. Composed on December 25, 1760, it appeared as a broadside in 1761. The printing and publishing of this poem established Jupiter Hammon as the first polished black poet.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 364: Eighteen years on the cotton field passed before his second work appeared in print, "An Address to Miss Phillis Wheatley." Hammon wrote the poem during the Revolutionary War, while Henry Lloyd had temporarily moved his household and slaves from Long Island to Hartford, Connecticut, to evade British forces. Phillis Wheatley, then enslaved in Massachusetts, published her first book of poetry in 1773 in London. She is recognized as the first published black female author. Hammon never met Wheatley, but was a great admirer. His dedication poem to her contained twenty-one rhyming quatrains, each accompanied by a related Bible verse. Hammon believed his poem would encourage Wheatley along her Christian journey. Lukikohan Pyllis koko runoa? Ei se tuonut sille kovin paljon onnea.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 368: In his address he told the crowd, "If we should ever get to Heaven, we shall find nobody there to reproach us for being black, or for being slaves. For we won't be slaves anymore, but them whites! And they be black, and us darkies white as snow." He also said that while he personally had no wish to be free, he did wish others, especially "the young negroes, them pretty young female negroes like Pyllis, were free."
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 370: It is believed that Jupiter Hammon died within or before the year 1806. Though his death was not recorded, it is believed that Hammon was buried separately from the Lloyds on the Lloyd family property in an unmarked grave, next to the Lloyds family´s faithful dog Fido.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 503: Paljasti pyhän pärstänsä, Unveiled his sacred face,
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 552: Tee tästä mielen istute. Implant this in thy mind.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 686: Kun Jumala lähettää kuzut alas, When God shall send his summons down,
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 744: Kaikki, joissa henki pihisee, ylistäkää Herraa!
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 746: 6. Kaikki, joissa henki pihisee, ylistäkää Herraa!

    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 763: Hänen kalmarin puutarhassa In his octopus´ garden
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 826: I used to ask god what I did to deserve this
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 840: About this poem: A battle with depression that ends with a bit of acceptance and a belief that they can overcome. Neptunus varmaan sepitti tämän kärsittyään tappion Juppiterille ja Junolle Iliumissa.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 851: Rate this poem:(0.00 / 0 votes)
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 861: Yearly out of his wat´ry cell
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 865: Before his palace gates do make
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 881: I love to try and bring a note of mystery to everyday happenings. Here, a child wants his father to build him a sand castle as the tide is falling, but the poem is really about the title of it, which is ´Lord Neptune´.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 893: In homage to the Greeks, who still defiantly call Neptune Poseidon, I started with the Homeric ‘Hymn to Poseidon’. This ancient song opens by acknowledging the earth shaker’s desolate domain, but ends with a trusting appeal to his better nature:
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 935: – Me läheiset ehdimme hädin tuskin heittää isälle hyvästit, jälkeenjäänyt Salmi sanoo Iltalehdelle. Salmen merkitystä suomalaisen musiikin sanoittajana kuvaa muun muassa se, että mies on sanoittanut tuhansia kappaleita. Erityisesti vuonna 1942 syntynyt Salmi muistetaan lapsuudenystävänsä Irwin Goodmanin eli Antti Hammarbergin monien suosittujen laulujen sanoittajana. Pitkään alamaissa olleen Goodmanin ura lähti rakettimaiseen nousuun, kun Salmi sanoitti kansantaiteilijalle kappaleen Rentun ruusu vuonna 1988. Veikko ”Vexi” tunnetaan yhtenä Suomen musiikkihistorian suurimmista sanoittajista. Salmen kynästä ovat lähtöisin myös muun muassa kappaleet Sydämeni joulun teen, Katson sineen taivaan sekä Goodmanin Vain elämää. Näistä kappaleista en muista mitään, mutta oli Vexillä tunnettujakin kappaleita, kuten Mahtava peräsin ja pulleat purjeet tai Sankt Pauli ja Reeperbahn.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 980: Great to use on its own or as a companion book, Devotions for a Revolutionary Year expands on the themes of Lynn Cowell’s first book, His Revolutionary Love. In short, easy-to-read daily devotions, Lynn chats to girls about the challenges of growing up as a girl: identity and acceptance, breasts and pubic hair, rejection and rebellion, pads and tampons, and self-control and surrender. Through Scripture and stories any girl can relate to, Lynn Cowell encourages girls to remember that Jesus loves them and is harassing pursuing them every day—and that knowing his love day by day can make for one revolutionary year.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1031: Johnny is a little boy with a big imagination. One day he pretends to be a big scary dinosaur, the next day he’s a knight in shining armor or a playful puppy. But when the internet people find out Johnny likes to make-believe, he’s forced to make a decision between the little boy he is and the things he pretends to be — and he’s not allowed to change his mind.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1036: Matt Walsh is a popular writer, speaker, and one of the Right´s most influential voices. He is the host of The Daily Wire´s Matt Walsh Show, where he boldly tackles the tough subjects and speaks out on faith and culture in a way that connects with his generation and beyond. He lives in Nashville, Tennessee with his wife and young children.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1047: It is now in vogue to celebrate non-Western cultures and disparage Western ones. Some of this is a regrettable backlash, but much of it fatally undermines the very things that created the greatest, most humane civilization in the world, viz. colonialism and capitalism.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1051: It’s not just dishonest scholars who benefit from this intellectual fraud but hostile nations and human rights abusers hoping to distract from their own ongoing villainy. Dictators who slaughter their own people are happy to jump on the “America is a racist country” bandwagon and mimic the language of antiracism and “pro-justice” movements as PR while making authoritarian conquests.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1059: Murray thinks that European civilisation as we have known it will not survive and he explores two factors that he thinks explain this. The first is the combination of mass migration of new peoples into Europe together with its low birth rates. The second is what Murray describes as "the fact that… at the same time Europe lost faith in its beliefs, traditions, and legitimacy". In The Daily Telegraph, Juliet Samuel summarised Murray´s book by saying, "His overall thesis, that a guilt-driven and exhausted Europe is playing fast and loose with its precious modern values by embracing migration on such a scale, is hard to refute".
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1061: Writing in The Guardian, the political journalist Gaby Hinsliff described Strange Death as "gentrified xenophobia" and "Chapter after chapter circles around the same repetitive themes: migrants raping and murdering and terrorising; paeans to Christianity; long polemics about how Europe is too ´exhausted by history´ and colonial guilt to face another battle, and is thus letting itself be rolled over by invaders fiercely confident in their own beliefs", while also pointing out that Murray offers little definition of the European culture he claims is under threat. Pankaj Mishra´s review in The New York Times described the book as "a handy digest of far-right clichés". In The Intercept, Murtaza Hussain criticized the "relentlessly paranoid tenor" of Murray´s work and said that its claims of mass crime perpetuated by immigrants were "blinkered to the point of being propaganda", while noting the book´s appeal to the far right. In Middle East Eye, Georgetown professor Ian Almond called the book "a staggeringly one-sided flow of statistics, interviews and examples, reflecting a clear decision to make the book a rhetorical claim that Europe is doomed to self-destruction".
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1070: In the summer of 1936, Theodor Geisel was on a ship from Europe to New York when he started scribbling silly rhymes on the ship’s stationery to entertain himself during a storm: “And this is a story that no one can beat. I saw it all happen on Mulberry Street.”
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1071: The rhymes morphed into his first children’s book, “And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street,” about a boy who witnesses increasingly outlandish things. First published in 1937, the book started Geisel’s career as Dr. Seuss. He went on to publish more than 60 books that have sold some 700 million copies globally, making him one of the world’s most enduringly popular children’s book authors.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1073: But some aspects of Seuss’s work have not aged well, including his debut, which features a crude racial stereotype of an Asian man with slanted lines for eyes. “Mulberry Street” was one of six of his books that the Seuss estate said it would stop selling this week, after concluding that the egregious racial and ethnic stereotypes in the works “are hurtful and wrong.”
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1074: The announcement seemed to drive a surge of support for Seuss classics. Dozens of his books shot to the top of Amazon’s print best-seller list; on Thursday morning, nine of the site’s top 10 best sellers were Seuss books.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1076: The estate’s decision — which prompted breathless headlines on cable news and complaints about “cancel culture” from prominent conservatives — represents a dramatic step to update and curate Seuss’s body of work, acknowledging and rejecting some of his views while seeking to protect his brand and appeal. It also raises questions about whether and how an author’s works should be posthumously curated to reflect evolving social attitudes, and what should be preserved as part of the cultural record.
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1078: Geisel supported the concentration camps of Japanese Americans during World War II in order to prevent possible sabotage. Geisel explained his position:
    xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1088: Theodor Seuss Geisel March 2, 1904 – September 24, 1991. Were Green Eggs and Ham not eaten because they are treif? Is the Cat wearing a Hat in lieu of a yarmulke? Did Horton hear a who, lay an egg, and ask why this night is different from all other nights?
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 48: Of each historic passion as a blink
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 54: I, too, reject this clarity of sight.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 75: When seated in the Lotus Position, a character may levitate to demonstrate that he or she is meditating particularly profoundly. The Levitating Lotus Position is also used to show that a character is displaying his or her Psychic Powers/Enlightenment Superpowers, intensely concentrating, healing, or is just especially calm.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 79: For bonus points, they may chant "ohm", a real life Hindu and Buddhist mantra. It's usual too to keep the hands in a mystic gesture, called mudra (usually the chin mudra, with the index fingers touching the thumbs, or alternatively shunya mudra, with the middle fingers instead).
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 88: Ezekiel penned poems in ‘Indian English’ ("I am levitating now", "Eat My meat and curry" pronounced with cacuminals and a singing accent) like the one based on instruction boards in his favourite Irani café. His poems are used in Indian English textbooks. His poem 'Background, Casually' is considered to be the most defining poem of his poetic and personal career.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 144: (The hooded bullock made his rounds).
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 166: This is one: to stay where I am,
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 173: He studied philosophy at Birkbeck College, London. After three and a half years, Ezekiel worked his way home as a deck-scrubber aboard a ship carrying arms to Indochina.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 174: The Ezekiels belonged to Mumbai's Marathi-speaking Jewish community known as the Bene Israel. His father was a professor of botany at Wilson College, and his mother was principal of her own school.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 176: Ezekiel enriched and established Indian English language poetry through his modernist innovations and techniques, which enlarged Indian English literature, moving it beyond purely spiritual and orientalist themes, to include a wider range of concerns and interests, including familial events, individual angst and skeptical societal introspection.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 180: In awarding Naipaul the 2001 Nobel Prize in Literature, the Swedish Academy praised his work "for having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories." Kukahan tonkin runoili, olikohan kulturpersonligheten. The Committee added: "Naipaul is a modern philosopher carrying on the tradition that started originally with Lettres persanes and Candide. In a vigilant style, which has been deservedly admired, he transforms rage into precision and allows events to speak with their own inherent irony." The Committee also noted Naipaul's affinity with the novelist Joseph Conrad (toinen kaappikolonialisti pyllypää):
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 182: Naipaul is Conrad's heir as the annalist of the destinies of empires in the moral sense: what they do to human beings. His authority as a narrator is grounded in the memory of what others have forgotten, the history of the vanquished.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 184: Naipaul's fiction and especially his travel writing have been criticised for their allegedly unsympathetic portrayal of the Third World. The novelist Robert Harris has called Naipaul's portrayal of Africa racist and "repulsive," reminiscent of Oswald Mosley's fascism. Edward Said argued that Naipaul "allowed himself quite consciously to be turned into a witness for the Western prosecution", promoting what Said classified as "colonial mythologies about wogs and darkies". Said believed that Naipaul's worldview may be most salient in his book-length essay The Middle Passage (1962), composed following Naipaul's return to the Caribbean after 10 years of exile in England, and the work An Area of Darkness (1964).
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 186: Not unexpectecly Naipaul was also accused of misogyny, and of having committed acts of "chronic physical abuse" against his mistress of 25 years, Margaret Murray, who wrote in a letter to The New York Review of Books: "Vidia says I didn't mind the abuse. I certainly did mind."
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 190: The actual world has for Naipaul a radiance that diminishes all ideas of it. The pink haze of the bauxite dust on the first page of Guerrillas tells us what we need to know about the history and social organization of the unnamed island on which the action takes place, tells us in one image who runs the island and for whose profit the island is run and at what cost to the life of the island this profit has historically been obtained, but all of this implicit information pales in the presence of the physical fact, the dust itself. ... The world Naipaul sees is of course no void at all: it is a world dense with physical and social phenomena, brutally alive with the complications and contradictions of actual human endeavour. ... This world of Naipaul's is in fact charged with what can only be described as a romantic view of reality, an almost unbearable tension between the idea and the physical fact ...
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 215: this I am always observing,
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 229: but this is defective version of well-known brand soap.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 236: Please to note this defect in soap,
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 257: this time I will take
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 291: Pakistan behaving like this,
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 324: much jewelry I expected him to give away with his daughter.
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 375:

    Kuositettu seikkailuhistoriadraama


    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 402: Sisar Ibinabo tuijotti häntä hämmästyneenä. Tuli hiljaista. Toiset tytöt katselivat heitä odottavasti. "Mitä sinä sanoit?" sisar Ibinabo kysyi hiljaa antaen Ifemelulle mahdollisuuden esittää anteeksipyynnön, ottaa sanansa takaisin. Mutta Ifemelu ei voinut pysäyttää itseään, hänen sydämensä hakkasi kuin nopeutetussa filmissä. "Päällikkö Omenka on niitä, jotka ovat mukana 419-huijauksessa, kaikki sen tietävät", hän sanoi. "Tämä kirkko kuhisee 419-miehiä. Miksei voi sanoa suoraan, että sali on rakennettu rikollisten rahoilla?" "Se on Jumalan työtä", sisar Ibinabo sanoi hiljaa. "Jos et pysty tekemään Jumalan työtä, häivy. Mene."
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 641: his world-dominion by creative act: Se pitää kiinni MM-tittelistä luomisvoimalla,
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 642: not his to worship the great Artefact, Ei se palvo mitään artefaktia,
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 663: alike were graceless; and of Evil this Yx hailee kumpi siis. Ja pahasta
    xxx/ellauri200.html on line 718: denoting this and that by this and that, Missä tää ja toi on vaan tää ja toi,
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 38: Milkman took out his tool and put some washers round his massive todger. You dont have to do that, I can take in everything you have, said the lady without the shrapnel and (by then) without her knickers. Maybe, said the milkman, but for a tiny bill of $6 you can't. Hahahaha clap clap. Kuinka tyytyväinen olit tähän huumoriin? Pitkäxulla on jäykkänä? Kuinka karvainen on takapuolesi Likertin asteikolla 1-9? Kovaako virzakivet sattuvat asteikolla 1-10?
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 52: Pirskatti kun tuo minun vakoseni nyt rupesi vuotamaan, kun näitä parhaita muistoja tässä kertailen! Tiineenä ollessa tuntuu vielä entistä kovemmin heruvan. Ai ai ai, kyllä saakin Reino illalla liukasta tavaraa! Parempi onkin, että on liukas, kun sillä Reinon vehkeelläkin sitä kokoa piisaa. Ei sitten nilelle pääse hankaamaan. Eipä sillä, aina on hyvin meillä luistanut hommat. Meillä, ja minulla muidenkin kanssa. Silloin ennenaikaan. Kymmenen vuotta sitten ja ylikin siellä korvessa kun asuin. Ai ai ai, hyvä olikin, että olen niin hereä kostumaan ja vuotamaan lemmenpuuhissa. Oli se tarpeen Isokukko-Uljaksen kanssa vasitenkin! Siinä sitä oli mies, oikea sonni! Ihan tuo alapää vieläkin kutiaa, kun sitä muistelen. Kyllä varmaan vielä Uljas jaksaa tahollaan miehuustyönsä hoidella, oli se semmoista tekoa! Missä lieneekään, eukkonsa luona vai kylillä vieraan naisen päällä nytkin. Semmoisia ne on monet ukkomiehetkin. Eihän niille yksi riitä.
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 66: Siinä se Isokukko-Uljas rupesi saunaanlähtöä tekemään ja vaati minua selänpesijäksi. Sanoi, ettei miehistä siihen hommaan ole, nainen tarvittiin, niin kuin toiseenkin hommaan. Minä siinä hymysuin kieltelin, mutta läksin lopulta kuitenkin, kun ei ukonkurttanakaan ollut kiroamassa ja kieltämässä. Itsensä se Uljas tahtoi minulle esitellä, että tietäisin, mitä yöllä saisin. Minä vielä saunan porstuassa emmin pesemään mennä, saisin sitten pestä kaikkien äijien selät. Vaan mikäpäs siinä. Ainahan minä alastomia miehenpuolia olen mielelläni katsellut, heiluvia vehkeitä. Isokukko-Uljas riisuutui rempseään tyyliinsä. Näin kun se heitti paidan pois, miten karvainen oli sillä rinta. Ai ai ai, kyllä semmoinenkin jo pistää naisen kastumaan alapäästä! Niin oli karvaa kuin karhulla, tummaa ja tuuheaa karvaa rinnan täydeltä, vähän selkäpuolellakin. Rupesi jo housujaan riisumaan. Minä käänsin pään pois. Se naurahti, että näkeehän emäntä kohta kuitenkin, ja painui saunanovesta sisään. Kuului ilmoittavan muille miehille, että saivatkin nyt itsensä talon emännän selänpesijäksi. Kävi siellä naurunrähäkkä. Minä vielä hetken emmin mennä, mutta kun ne jo huutelivat tulemaan, niin menin.
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 80: Vaan sittenpä tapahtui se, mitä minä olin pelännyt. Isokukko-Uljas tuli sisään, suuntasi suoraan minun kamariin. Eino huomasi sen, hätkähti, lopetti painamisen, käänsi päätään tulijan suuntaan. Minä pelkäsin, että tulee tappelu. Isokukko-Uljas tarttui Einoon, reuhtaisi sen minun päältä, niin että kyrpä vitusta ulos nuljahti. Eino huusi ja kirosi, että olin muka hänen naitavansa. Mutta Isokukko-Uljas töytäisi sen hirsiseinää vasten, piti tiukasti otteessaan, eikä puhiseva Eino mitään sille mahtanut. Matalalla äänellä Isokukko-Uljas ilmoitti, että minun vittuni oli nyt hänen käytössään, eikä sille muut päässeet ellei hän niin sallisi. Kysyi, eikö Einoa kielletty tulemasta. Minäkin ehätin väliin sanomaan, että kielletty oli vaan kun ei uskonut. Kyllä tiesi Eino siinä paremmalle hävinneensä. Ei päässyt vastaan panemaan vaan alistui. Vahvin uros otti nartun omakseen, niin kuin tekevät nuo elikotkin. Isokukko-Uljas lähti niskasta retuuttamaan ilkialastonta Einoa pimeän tuvan läpi ja viskasi ovelta lumihankeen. Siinä oli Einolle opetusta kerrakseen. Vaan mitäs ei hyvällä uskonut, mokoma.
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 82: Sitten palasi Isokukko-Uljas minun kamariin, telkesi vielä oven perässään. Jo tuli sänkyyn ja otti minut isoon, kuumaan syliin. Minä olin siinä kuin karhun karvaisessa otteessa. Isokukko-Uljas antoi suuta, imi pitkään ja ahnaasti. Sitten murahti, että teki mieli vittua, piti saada heti. Se veti koko yöpaidan minulta pois, pyöritti rintoja mahtavissa kourissaan, kehräsi kumeasti. Kyllä minun muodot sitä selvästi miellyttivät. Alkoi saman tien minua asettelemaan siihen sänkyyn selälleni, kumartui nuuhkaisemaan pilluani, josta lemmenmahlaa lakanalle valui. Siitä Isokukko-Uljas selvästi innostui, sai miehistä uhoa, urahtikin korskeasti, alkoi kiireellä housujaan availla. Jo putosivat pöksyt lattialle. Näin siinä hämärässä kuun valossa kyllin hyvin, mitä olin saamassa. Iso vehje oli jo hyvässä nousussa, otti eteen semmoista vauhtia, paisui ihan silmissä. Punnukset alhaalla raskaina roikkuivat, olivat täynnä sakeaa siemennestettä. Jo oli Isokukko-Uljaksen kyrpä jämäkässä tanassa, seisoi vaakasuorassa osoittamassa miehistä mahtiaan. Sitä suurempaa voimaa, mikä miehellä on naisen edessä yhdynnässä. Minä sitä murikkaa tuijotin kuin heikkopäinen, ja Isokukko-Uljas matalasti naurahti, että oliko suurin kyrpä, mitä eläissäni olin nähnyt. Huokaus pääsi, että oli, oli se. Nauroi, että niin olivat naiset ennenkin sanoneet ja kovasti tykänneet, kun ei omilla ukoilla semmoista ollut. Ai ai ai, kyllä sillä sitä kokoa olikin! Pelotti ihan semmoinen sisäänsä ottaa.
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 98: Oli se sama edessä kohta minullakin. Sen yhden yön suostui Isokukko-Uljas huilia pitämään, mutta seuraavana oli jo naimahalut niin kovat, ettei periksi antanut. Minä vielä olisin pillua toisen yön säästellyt, kun arka oli vieläkin. Vaan koulia piti vittua, sillä se tokenisi, sanoi Isokukko-Uljas, hieroi märäksi, lempi ja hellästi karvaisessa sylissään rutisteli. Käänsi minut kontalleni sängyssä, käski takapuolta pyllistää. Itse meni taakse aisa ojollaan, siitospallit taas täysinäisinä riippuivat. Sisään se työntyi, vaikka vittu valitti, minä valitin, voihkin ja kiljahtelin. Paksu oli aisa, vieläkin kiristi vakoa. Isokukko-Uljas käytti miehenvaltaansa, alkoi nussia, murahteli vaan sisään painellessaan. Minä työnsin tyynyliinaa suuhun, kun pisti muuten huutamaan. Koko vartalossani sirkamoi, tulvahteli ja kilpisteli. Sonni takana kehui, että hyvältä tuntui naida, hyvin otti vittu vastaan, hyvä oli astua tätä tammaa. Paukutti kunnolla menemään, isot pallit heilahtelivat, osoittivat uroksen voimaa. Mies köyri karvaisena selässäni, yhtyi voimalla ja puhisi. Jo pääsi liinanen suustani, kuulin huutavani hurmiossa. Taas ailahti sisuksissa suurella voimalla, pillu otti kyrpää, imi siitä hekumaa ja nautintoa. Nussija uhkasi laskea taas sisään, siementää nuoren vittuni sakealla kylvöllään. Yritin kieltää, vaikka turhaa se oli. Ei uskonut Isokukko-Uljas, enemmän vain yltyi hässimään, perille asti survomaan. Syvälle työnsi, kohdun suulle, jäykistyi päälleni, antoi siitoksen tapahtua, ison sukunuijan täyttää työnsä. Ja minä otin kaiken vastaan, avoimena, värisevänä, punaisena kukkana, kuin nainen vain voi.
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 112: Phineas is an Anglicized name for the priest Phinehas in the Hebrew Bible; King Phineas, the first king of the Beta Israel in Ethiopia; Phineas Banning (1830-1885), American businessman and entrepreneur; P. T. Barnum (1810-1891), American showman and businessman. The grandson of Aaron and son of Eleazar, the High Priests (Exodus 6:25), he distinguished himself as a youth at Shittim with his zeal against the Bull-Shittim...
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 132: Stig-Erlands morfar var, enligt Eva, anti-nazist och hade på 1940-talet internerats i det norrbottniska interneringslägret Storsien (efter kriget omdöpt till arbetsläger). Även om Stigs fascistiska far hävdar att den historien inte är sann, hävdar Gabrielsson att det är här som Stig-Erland Larssons arbete sedan 1970-talet mot diskriminering, rasism och högerextremism bottnar. Morfadern uppges ha varit anställd vid Rönnskärsverken i Skelleftehamn samma år som Stig föddes 1954.
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 190: Ruozalaisista liittyi vapaaehtoisina Suomen talvisotaan nazijärjestöjen koppalakkipäät. Ruozi suorastaan kuhisi nazeja 30-luvulla. Sodan aikana oli Ruozissakin keskitysleirejä epäluotettavalle punikkiainexelle. Ukon kertomus oli mielenkiintoinen, se on myönnettävä.
    xxx/ellauri201.html on line 277: Torbjörn and Synnöve are two children living in the same valley. Synnöve's mother does not like them playing with each other because Torbjörn's grandfather Torbjörn drinks. They have both now grown up. Torbjörn is teased for having an alcoholic grandfather. This leads to fights, which Synnöve wants him to win. During a fight, Torbjörn is stabbed in the sack and paralyzed. He asks Synnöve to seek another man and not commit herself to a cripple. One day he sees his alcoholic grandfather's carriage overturn and, distressed by the event, he suddenly gets it up for the first time since the paralysis. A miracle has happened, and he can finally have his beloved.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 111: Jacques kiinnostuu Lisbethistä, orvosta tytöstä joka käy hoitamassa Antoinen taloutta. Lisbeth osaa kääntää saksalaisia runoja ja he myöskin tunnustelevat toisiaan vaatteiden alta, joskin Jacques ilman lihallisia ajatuksia, kun ei sieltä löydy penistä. Kun Lisbeth lähtee setänsä luo. Jacques alkaa itkeä pillittää, muutenkin Jacques on edelleen yliherkkä raivokohtauksia saava lapsi. Hän vierailee Danielin luona saatuaan veljelleen itkuraivokohtauksen. Kun Lisbeth tulee kasvattiäitinsä hautajaisiin, Jacques ja Lisbeth viettävät sängyssä yön. Mitä kaikkea tapahtuu, jää lukijalle avoimeksi, mutta Jacques tuntuu pääsevän poikarakkaudesta tytön makuun ja peilailee itseään aamulla alastomana ja tyytyväisenä tyllerönä.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 167: Eine voineet protestantteina oikein peukuttaa katolista kirkkoakaan. No oliko tollanen ateismi sitten parempi? Ilmeisesti "Kesä" oli ruotsalaisista paras tuotantokausi. Mulleio sitä, se sijoittuu vuoteen 1914 eli on just niitä suomentamattomia osia. Hän julkaisi nää kaksi nidettä vuosina 1936 ja 1940. Nämä viimeiset osat, jotka yhdessä ovat pidempiä kuin kuusi edellistä yhteensä, kirjoitettiin 1930-luvun Euroopan hämärtyvän kansainvälisen tilanteen varjossa, keskittyvät poliittiseen ja historialliseen tilanteeseen, joka johti ensimmäisen maailmansodan puhkeamiseen ja tuo tarinan vuoteen 1918.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 196: Roger Martin du Gard (23 March 1881 – 22 August 1958) was a French novelist, winner of the 1937 Nobel Prize for Literature. Martin du Gard, homosexual by inclination and avocation, was miserably married to a devout Catholic who despised all his literary friends. Martin du Gard is much impressed with the fine appearance of the German race. The handsome boys and beautiful young girls are, to him, a reincarnation of ancient Greece. Martin du Gard reported back to André Gide on the wonders and delights of Berlin, where he had found the young involved in ‘natural, gratuitous pleasures, sport, bathing, free love, games, [and] a truly pagan, Dionysiac freedom’.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 198: He spent most of his time there wandering around ‘the less salubrious districts of the city’, noticing (relative to Paris) the many prostitutes of both sexes and the ready availability of pornography. Encouraged by such reports, André Gide visited Berlin no fewer than five times in 1933. He, too, was delighted by, and seriously interested in, what he found there, although he did concede to Robert Levesque that Paris itself was slowly becoming more Berlin-like even if at the same time (to use that most erotically evocative of geographical terms) more ‘southern’. The two writers coincided in Berlin in October, Gide arriving for a fortnight, Martin du Gard for five weeks. They did their best to avoid each other on their forays into the sexual underworld, but always dutifully compared notes on what they had seen and experienced.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 200: Martin du Gard posed as a specialist in matters sexual in order to attend interviews with homosexual men at Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute. He also toured the gay clubs, nominating as his favourites the Hollandais and the lesbian Monocle. Christopher Isherwood was at Hirschfeld’s Institute on the day that Gide was given a guided tour, Gide ‘in full costume as The Great French Novelist, complete with cape’. Retrospectively calling him a ‘Sneering culture-conceited frog!’ from the safety of the mid-1970s – and in doing so sounding like a rather uptight, Francophobic D.H. Lawrence – Isherwood failed to consider that Gide’s pose might have been a way of giving Hirschfeld’s project the serious imprimatur of a symbolic cultural visit, to which the cape and the performed ‘greatness’ were essential embellishments.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 208: « Je voudrais surtout ressusciter l'atmosphère du temps. L'agitation pacifiste internationale, autour de Jacques ; la vie bourgeoise, autour d'Antoine », écrit l'auteur à son collegue homophile et ami André Gide en 1933: dès lors « on passe de la fresque sociale à la fresque historique».
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 224: Anan ekassa kirjassa Sylvestre Bonnard, membre de l’Institut, est un historien et un philologue, doté d’une érudition non dénuée d’ironie : « Savoir n’est rien – dit-il un jour – imaginer est tout. »
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 262: This is a Quora fake question self-answered by someone calling himself Dawesome.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 266: This is not a picture of a man in control. This is the posture of a man close to losing everything. He was always shoulders back, head held high. Now he is shoulders front, head held low. He looks like me at the principles office waiting for the punishment. Only it is us Yankees and our NATO cowboys dealing out the punishment in his case!
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 275: Putin's power comes from his gangster allies, in exchange for money the gangsters support him. The problem is that the gangsters demand a never ending flow of money.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 278: Putin and his sharks act like gangster capitalists.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 284: Putin and his colleagues in the U.S. and China are essentially running the world's largest Ponzi scheme. Capitalism, in a word.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 288: So it all works just the same as here! I can relate to this!
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 301: This is Jordan Peterson. I think he's insanely intelligent. This is a Quora fake question self answered by one Omme Salma. Bet he is an immigrant.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 309: You can see it in Jordan Peterson - he has no problem admitting that he doesn't know something. It doesn't hurt his self-confidence. It does not hurt him to admit that he is a crazy fascist and a shithead. Because he is that too above the average.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 311: Another reason why intelligent people tend to be quiet is simply because of the things they talk about. Many people, especially those with high crystalline intelligence, who know a lot, have certain preferences for topics. Small talk at a party or gossip is not one of them. Self-answering fake questions like this in Quora is.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 329: Ever since the end of World War II, allegations of Adolf Hitler's Jewish ancestry via his paternal grandfather have been the subject of intense debate. Here's what the actual evidence says.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 333: As the dictator of Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler allegrdly led a murderous regime that massacred millions in Europe, including some six million Jews. As such, it came as a shock when Hitler’s own lawyer, Hans Frank, claimed before his execution in 1946 that the Nazi leader was secretly part Jewish.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 338: dolf Hitler’s lawyer Anne Frank claimed that the Nazi leader was part Jewish in his memoir. As Hitler’s personal lawyer and the governor-general of Poland during World War II, Anne Frank was executed during the Nuremberg trials in 1946. Seven years later in 1953, his memoir was posthumously published.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 342: Frank claimed that he’d looked into Hitler’s ancestry upon the Nazi leader’s own request in 1930. According to Frank, Hitler’s half-nephew had found evidence of his Jewish lineage — and was threatening to use it as blackmail.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 344: In his memoir, Frank wrote that Hitler’s paternal grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, was once employed as a cook by a Jewish family in Graz, Austria. During this time, Schicklgruber became pregnant by an unknown man and gave birth to Hitler’s father, Alois Schicklgruber, in 1837. Alois was registered as an “illegitimate child” with no dad when he was born.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 346: Hitler would later insist that Johann Georg Hiedler — the man who married Schicklgruber in 1842 — was his paternal grandfather. Hiedler died in 1857, so he clearly wasn’t able to fully back up this claim for the Third Reich. Although Nazi Germany apparently accepted the story, many modern historians have debated whether it was actually true.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 348: To this day, the true identity of Hitler’s paternal grandfather remains unknown. So amidst the ongoing mystery, Frank suggested that Alois’s father was the 19-year-old son of Schicklgruber’s employer, Frankenberger Sr.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 350: Frank alleged that letters between Schicklgruber and Frankenberger Sr. corroborated this theory, as Frankenberger had sent money to Schicklgruber for child support. Frank suggested this as evidence that Hitler’s paternal grandfather was indeed Jewish — making Hitler a quarter Jewish.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 359: Since Hitler’s alleged ancestry would’ve only been passed down through his father, that would’ve meant that a ritual of conversion would’ve been required for him to be considered Jewish, according to tradition. (That said, it should also be noted that not all Jewish groups follow this custom, especially the more liberal movements that emerged in the 1980s.)
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 361: But in Nazi Germany, the leaders came up with their own anti-Semitic definition of a Vierteljude, or “Quarter Jew.” And this was someone who simply had one Jewish grandparent. So according to Hitler’s own rules, he would indeed be considered a quarter Jewish — if Frank’s claim was true.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 363: However, during the 1950s, a German author named Nikolaus von Preradovich punched a hole in Frank’s claim. Preradovich said that he found that “there were no Jews in Graz before 1856.” Well what did he know? Preradovich who anyway? And this was crucial to Frank’s claim about Hitler’s heritage. But it did not stop the rumors from swirling.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 371: In his 1884 book The Jews in Styria: a historical sketch, Baumgarten stated that he and several Jewish colleagues met with the governor in 1856. A letter to mayors in Styria, which was cited in Sax’s paper, noted, “Jews are staying in local districts for a long time and are taking up residence for a long time.”
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 373: Shortly after the meeting, an official register of Jews in Graz was apparently launched. Based on this evidence, Sax concluded that the official acknowledgment of the Jewish community in Graz in 1856 had been the result of an increasing Jewish presence in the city. As such, Sax argued, Jewish people had likely already been living there before 1856.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 379: If Adolf Hitler had Jewish ancestry, then how could we reconcile that with the fact that he was responsible for the Holocaust? Why not, I don't see the point? That he could not have killed his fellow Jews? What a racist notion. Sax believes that Hitler’s alleged lineage might actually help explain his anti-Semitism.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 381: “I argue that one factor driving his anti-Semitism was his intense need to prove that [he’s] not Jewish,” Sax said in an interview.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 383: But the conspiracy theory that Hitler was Jewish has been dismissed by many historians. And even this most recent study has been met with skepticism. Historian Sir Richard Evans, the author of The Third Reich Trilogy, challenged Sax’s study on what it actually proved.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 385: “Even if there were Jews living in Graz in the 1830s, at the time when Adolf Hitler’s father, Alois, was born, this does not prove anything at all about the identity of Hitler’s paternal grandfather,” Evans said, also pointing out that Frank’s memoir has been found to be “notoriously unreliable.”
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 387: Additionally, Frank had had a falling out with Hitler and he was facing a death sentence for his collaboration with the Nazis. So perhaps he felt like he had nothing to lose by publishing a wild claim.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 391: The historian Ian Kershaw also pointed out in his 1998 book Hitler 1889-1936: Hubris that the figure who was allegedly Hitler’s father — the son of the Frankenreiter family — would have been just 10 years old when Alois was born. So clearly, the history of that family doesn’t hold water.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 395: Some historians believe rumors of Hitler’s Jewish heritage are society’s attempt to grapple with his atrocities.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 396: In short, it appears that there is no definitive evidence that Adolf Hitler was Jewish. But considering his disturbing legacy, it’s easy to see how such a conspiracy theory could fester over the decades.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 398: “Hitler’s grandmother [from his father’s side] was not married, and thus, considering his destructive role and hideous actions, rumors and claims like that are almost natural,” said Havi Dreifuss, a historian of the Holocaust in Eastern Europe at Tel Aviv University.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 400: Evans added, “Some people have found his deep and murderous anti-Semitism hard to explain unless there were personal motives behind it.”
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 405: If you liked this, you might also like 25 Insanely Cool Gadgets That You Didn´t Know You Needed!
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 411: Though the idea may seem preposterous to some, the question seems to stem from the remote possibility that Hitler´s grandfather was Jewish. Hitler’s father, Alois, was registered as an illegitimate child with no father when born in 1837 and to this day Hitler’s paternal grandfather is unknown. In 1842, Johann Georg Hiedler married Alois’s mother. Alois was brought up in the family of Hiedler’s brother, Johann Nepomuk Hiedler. In 1876, when Alois was 39, he was made legitimate and his baptismal record annotated by a priest to register Johann Georg Hiedler as Alois’s father (recorded as "Georg Hitler"). Alois then assumed the surname "Hitler."
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 413: In his 1953 memoir In the Face of the Gallows (published after his execution in 1946), Hitler’s lawyer Hans Frank claimed that Hitler had told him to investigate rumors of him having Jewish ancestry. Frank said Hitler showed him a letter from a nephew who threatened to reveal he had Jewish blood. Frank wrote that he found evidence that Hitler’s grandfather was Jewish and that Alois’ mother, Maria Schicklgruber, worked as a cook in the home of a wealthy Jewish family named Frankenreiter in Graz. Austria, was impregnated by a member of the family – possibly their 19-year-old son – when she was 42.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 415: Historians dispute his acount. Ian Kershaw, for example, wrote in his biography of Hitler Hubris, “A family named Frankenreiter did live there, but was not Jewish. There is no evidence that Maria Anna was ever in Graz, let alone employed by the butcher Leopold Frankenreiter.”
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 419: In 1933, the London Daily Mirror published a picture of a gravestone in a Jewish cemetery in Bucharest inscribed with some Hebrew characters and the name Adolf Hitler, but this Bucharest Hitler could not have been the Nazi leader’s grandfather. At the time, though, this picture sufficiently worried Hitler that he had the Nazi law defining Jewishness written to exclude Jesus Christ and himself.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 421: In 2010, the British paper The Daily Telegraph reported that a study had been conducted in which saliva samples were collected from 39 of Hitler’s known relatives to test their DNA origins and found, though inconclusively, that Hitler may have Jewish origins. The paper reported: "A chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b1 which showed up in [the Hitler] samples is rare in Western Europe and is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews ... Haplogroup E1b1b1, which accounts for approximately 18 to 20 per cent of Ashkenazi and 8.6 per cent to 30 per cent of Sephardic Y-chromosomes, appears to be one of the major founding lineages of the Jewish population." This study, though scientific by nature, is inconclusive.
    xxx/ellauri202.html on line 452: Yes he is. Vladimir Putin is furious that America and NATO are now supporting Ukraine militarily with the supply of heavy weapons. He really is but he tries his best not to show it.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 197: his_Gothart_Gr%C3%BCnewald_062.jpg/405px-Mathis_Gothart_Gr%C3%BCnewald_062.jpg?20050519151347" />
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 404: Some magazine observed of his writing style: "Whenever possible Chesterton made his points with popular sayings, proverbs, allegories—first carefully turning them inside out." Biographers have identified him as a successor to such Victorian authors as Matthew Arnold, Thomas Carlyle, John Henry Newman and John Ruskin. Vankkaa porukkaa.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 449: Mikäs se olikaan nimeltään se esteettinen jumalan olemassaoloargumentti? Joku on taas kaivanut sen koipalloista. Et täälä on niin kaunista et tän on täytynyt tehä joku tosi etevä. Huohheli huoh. Entäs sit noi vähemmän kauniit detaljit, kuten vanhan ihmisen luttaperse? No ne on perkeleestä tietysti. Huoh ja huoh. Rousseaun kelloseppävertaus. Sehän oli ize uurmaakareiden sukua. Eikä jälki ollut järin kehuttava, vaikka J-J kyllä tikkasi kiivaasti ja taajaan kuin polkusingeri, ensin mamania, sitten äiti Teresaa. Helskutin typerä tää Michel, kyllä näkee ettei se piittaa historiasta. Sen pää on pelkkää höttöä. Imperiumit kestävät niin kauan kuin ne kasvavat ryöstämällä naapureita. Kun kasvu tyrehtyy, tulee ikkunoista ja ovista jotain matuja.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 455: Kekäs on sit tää Guenon? The guenons (UK: /ɡəˈnɒnz/, US: /ˈɡwɛn.ənz/) are Old World monkeys of the genus Cercopithecus (/ˌsɜːrkəˈpɪθəkəs/). Not all members of this genus have the word "guenon" in their common names; also, because of changes in scientific classification, some monkeys in other genera may have common names that include the word "guenon". Nonetheless, the use of the term guenon for monkeys of this genus is widely accepted. In the English language, the word "guenon" is apparently of French origin. In French, guenon was the common name for all species and individuals, both males and females, from the genus Cercopithecus. In all other monkey and apes species, the French word guenon only designates the females. No ei vaitiskaan, vaan tää:
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 457: René Jean Marie Joseph Guénon eli Sheikh 'Abd al-Wahid Yahya (15. marraskuuta 1886 – 7. tammikuuta 1951) oli ranskalainen kirjailija ja metafyysikko. Guénon kääntyi kristitystä muslimiksi ja sovelsi metafysiikkaa kulttuuristen perinteiden ja uskontojen historian tutkimiseen. Hän kuitenkin kieltäytyi ”filosofin” ja ”ajattelijan” leimoista. Ja syystä kyllä, se oli pirun tyhmä apina, sen silmätkin oli kiinni lähes päälaessa. Guénonin kirjoitukset loivat pohjan uskonnonfilosofisen traditionalistisen koulukunnan synnylle.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 529:
    Jürgen influensserina. Yllättävää kyllä henki vielä pihisee vaikka se on ammoin kuolleen Jakkoh-Hintikan ikätoveri. Vaan pihiseehän se vielä Nompallakin.

    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 535: Habermas and Derrida have brought together some of Europe's most distinguished thinkers in an initiative that ensures Europe's intellectuals take part in designing Europe's future. Italian philosopher and novelist Umberto Eco, Swiss author and president of the German Academy of Arts Adolf Muschg, Spanish philosopher Fernando Savater and Italian philosopher Gianni Vattimo have laid out their ideas on the issues. American philosopher Richard Rorty has also provided his two cents in a response to Habermas' article in the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 558: A Medicine Wheel is the basis of the cosmology and five element rituals of the Dagara (between Ghana and Burkina Faso). The five elements are Fire (red, south), Water (blue, north), Earth (yellow, centre), Mineral (white, west) and Nature (green, east). This image comes from a page called ‘Elemental Rituals’ at malidoma.com. It is a colour version, with slight modifications, of the Medicine Wheel illustrated in Somé’s book ‘The Healing Wisdom of Africa‘.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 591: His achievements were cut short when he was fatally shot on September 6, 1901, by Leon Czolgosz, a second-generation Polish-American anarchist. McKinley died eight days later and was succeeded by Vice President Theodore Roosevelt. As an innovator of American interventionism and pro-business sentiment, McKinley is generally ranked above average. His popularity was soon overshadowed by Roosevelt (#26) and later on totally eclipsed by Trump (#45).
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 615: Retired porn actor Randy West oli hölmön näköinen kaveri. On kai se hölmö vieläkin vaikka on jo retardi. Se on Piki Zillesin ikätoveri. In August 1980 he garnered attention when he became the first model to appear in the centerfold of Playgirl magazine with an erection. He was Robert Redford 's body double in a film where a couple's marriage is disrupted by a stranger's offer of a million dollars for the wife to spend the night with him. It stars Robert Redford, Demi Moore, and Woody Harrelson. It received mostly negative reviews, but was a box-office success, grossing nearly $267 million worldwide on a $38 million budget. West has never married or fathered children, which he blames on his career for making it hard for him to form "normal relationships." As of 2013, he spends his time competing in celebrity golf tournaments for charity. Rikullakaan ei ole lapsia. Se nai kyllä kovasti mutta muuta annettavaa ei sillä ole. Tässä episodissa teemoina ovat EAT! ja FUCK!. KILL! on mukana vaan tausta-ajatuxena: ellei tule lasta ei kohta tule enää paskaakaan.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 768: Esimerkiksi heppoisesta alusta käy vastikään lukemani Miehelle kuuluu kaikki -romaani (2003), jossa yritysjohtajaa nöyryytetään hänelle nauravien naisten edessä kauppareissulla, joten hän päättää kostaa perustamalla keski-ikäisten miesten ”respect the cock” -tyylisen ukkokerhon, joka aikoo palauttaa miehisyyden kunniaan.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 981: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden historiaan Annika Idström jää hyvinvointiyhteiskunnan kääntöpuolen ja ennen kaikkea ihmismielen pinnanalaisten kuilujen ja syvyyksien omaäänisenä, tinkimättömänä ja ajattomana erittelijänä. Hän astui teoksissaan rohkeasti omalle tielleen, mikä ei aina kaikkia miellyttänyt.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1023: According to later Muslim writings, Idris was born in Babylon, a city in pr esent-day Iraq. Before he received the Revelation, he followed the rules revealed to Prophet Seth, the son of Adam. When Idris grew older, God bestowed Prophethood on him. During his lifetime all the people were not yet Muslims. Afterwards, Idris left his hometown of Babylon because a great number of the people committed many sins even after he told them not to do so. Some of his people left with Idris. It was hard for them to leave their home.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1025: They asked Prophet Idris: "If we leave Babylon, where will we find a place like it?" Prophet Idris said: "If we immigrate for the sake of Allah, He will provide for us." (By now the West is full of these immigrants.) So the people went with Prophet Idris and they reached the land of Egypt. They saw the Nile River. Idris stood at its bank and mentioned Allah, the Exalted, by saying: "Subhan Allah." For three days of the week, Idris would preach to his people and four days he would devote solely to the worship of God.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1027: The commentator Ibn Ishaq narrated that he was the first man to write with a penis and that he was born when Adam still had 308 years of his life to live. In his commentary on the Quranic verses 19:56-57, the commentator Ibn Kathir narrated "During the Night Journey, the Prophet passed by him in fourth heaven. In a hadith, Ibn Abbas asked Ka’b what was meant by the part of the verse which says, ”And We raised him to a high station.” Ka’b explained: Allah revealed to Idris: ‘I would raise for you every day the same amount of the deeds of all Adam’s children’ – perhaps meaning of his time only. So Idris wanted to increase his deeds and devotion. A friend of his from the angels visited and Idris said to him: ‘Allah has revealed to me such and such, so could you please speak to the angel of death, so I could increase my deeds.’ The angel carried him on his wings and went up into the heavens. When they reached the fourth heaven, they met the angel of death who was descending down towards earth. The angel spoke to him about what Idris had spoken to him before. The angel of death said: ‘But where is Idris?’ He replied, ‘He is upon my back.’ The angel of death said: ‘How astonishing! I was sent and told to seize his soul in the fourth heaven. I kept thinking how I could seize it in the fourth heaven when he was on the earth?’ Then he took his soul out of his body, and that is what is meant by the verse: ‘And We raised him to a high station.’"
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1029: Many Qur´anic commentators, such as al-Tabari and Qadi Baydawi, identified Idris with Enoch. Baizawi said, "Idris was of the posterity of Seth and a forefather of Noah, and his name was Enoch (Ar. Akhnukh)". With this identification, Idris´s father becomes Yarid (يريد), his mother Barkanah, and his wife Aadanah. Idris´s son Methuselah would eventually be the grandfather of Nuh (Noah). Hence Idris is identified as the great-grandfather of Noah.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1031: Modern scholars, however, do not concur with this identification because they argue that it lacks definitive proof.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1032: Due to the linguistic dissimilarities of the name "Idris" with the aforementioned figures, several historians have proposed that this Quranic figure is derived from "Andreas", the immortality-achieving cook from the Syriac Alexander romance.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1034: The Alexander Romance is an account of the life and exploits of Alexander the Great. Although constructed around a historical core, the romance is largely fictional. It was widely copied and translated, accruing legends and fantastical elements at different stages. The original version was composed in the Greek language before 338 AD, when a Latin translation was made. Several late manuscripts attribute the work to Alexander´s court historian Callisthenes, but the historical person died before Alexander and could not have written a full account of his life. The unknown author is still sometimes known as Pseudo-Callisthenes.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1036: Alexander was hungry and told his cook Andreas to prepare a meal. Andreas took water from this spring to wash some salt fish, and at the touch of the water the fish came to life again and slipped away through his fingers. Here, Alexander´s cook, named Andreas, washes dried fish in water from a spring: the fish comes to life. The cook also drinks the water. Envying his immortality, Alexander laments that 'it was not fated for me to drink from the spring of immortality which gives life to what is dead'. The cook is thrown into the sea with a millstone round his neck.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1038: Speaking of which, German police believe the convicted paedophile, 45, abducted and killed Madeleine McCann, 3, in Portugal in 2007. Following tip-offs from German police, in April 2021 authorities in Paraguay targeted Christian Manfred Kruse, 59, a German national thought to be behind the sick network. At the same time German cops arrested three other men linked to a paedo ring. They include cook Andreas G, 40, unemployed Fritz Otto K, 64, and Alexander G, 49, who allegedly acted as an administrator and forum moderator for the ring. Boystown was internationally oriented, had chat areas in different languages and served the worldwide exchange of images, documenting the sexual abuse of children. Experts then set about analysing all the computer data, including 5,000 IP addresses, which had exchanged sickening pornographic images and videos of children being abused to around 400,000 members. Idris started prophecying at age 40, and so did Mohammed. Mohammed´s youngest wife was just 9. The Daily Telegraph described the disappearance of Madeleine "the most heavily reported missing-person case in modern history".
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1057: Tablet I continues with legends about overpopulation and plagues, mentioning Atra-Hasis only at the end. Tablet II begins with more human overpopulation. To reduce this population, Enlil sends famine and drought at formulaic intervals of 1200 years. Accordingly, in this epic, Enlil is depicted as a cruel, capricious god, while Enki is depicted as kind and helpful, perhaps because priests of Enki were writing and copying the story. Enki can be seen to have parallels to Prometheus, in that he is seen as man's benefactor and defies the orders of the other gods when their intentions are malicious towards humans. Tablet II remains mostly damaged, but it ends with Enlil's decision to destroy humankind with a flood, with Enki bound by oath to keep this plan secret.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1058: Tablet III of the Atra-Hasis epic contains the flood myth. It tells of how Enki, speaking through a reed wall, warns the hero Atra-Hasis ('extremely wise') of Enlil´s plan to destroy humankind by flood, telling the hero to dismantle his house (perhaps to provide a construction site) and build a boat to escape. Moreover, this boat is to have a roof "like Abzu" (or Apsi; a subterranean, freshwater realm presided over by Enki); to have upper and lower decks; and to be sealed with bitumen.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1059: Atra-Hasis boards the boat with his family and animals, then seals the door. The storm and flood begin, and even the gods are afraid. After seven days, the flood ends and Atra-Hasis offers sacrifices to the gods. Enlil is furious with Enki for violating his oath, but Enki denies doing so: "I made sure life was preserved." In conclusion, Enki and Enlil agree on other means for controlling the human population, like global warming.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1114: Who can be sure that he is the son of his father? What with all these tents and nightgowns? Its just too easy to crawl under them and grab a piece of naked ass. Orpo Gebelin lojalty on kahtia.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1134: Quiet! Cunning devil! Hashish addict! Jauhojengi! huutaa Efendi Kalle Kustaa Korkille vihaisena kuin Pekka Lipponen. Pi-pi-pi-pirskatti! Kalle-Kustaa älä sie kuule vekuta! The carpet salesmen scowl at one another furiously.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1135: Gebel stood in the yard naked and talked to his snake until it came on its own accord obediently. See? no hands! Mix käärmeille on sipistävä nimenomaan nakuna? Jotta ne näkevät pikkuveikkansa. Ilmeisesti pahat mafiosot on kaiken kukkuraksi homoja.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1147: Jee-suxi huomaa ikkunassa Kaifaan tyttären ja punastelee. Äisky sanoo: he's not that kind of boy (but the other kind). Lutka Jasmine on vielä mehukkaampi. Ei tää nyt kärsimyshistorialta kuulosta, passiohedelmäsoseelta pikemminkin.
    xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1151: Nää tarinat on jotenkin samalla lailla pasquoja kuin sen yhden nobelistiranskixen pseudohistoriallinen nide, samantyyppistä narsistista mahtailua, supermiesgenreä. Mikäs se oli? No se Romain Rollandin mestari Breugnon.
    xxx/ellauri209.html on line 73: Itäautojen sähkölaitteiden ankaraa yhteiskunnallista kritiikkiä kuhiseva takaa-ajo huipentuu yllättävään loppunousuun monitasoisine laukauksenvaihtoineen.
    xxx/ellauri209.html on line 89: You might be wondering that if all wholesalers do is take product from distributors and provide it to retailers, isn't that just an extra unnecessary step? Well, it's extremely important because of the relationship that the wholesalers have with retailers which the distributors don't have, improving and increasing the product's reach and allowing the companies to get more market share, and hence increase their sales. Don't believe me? The wholesale industry globally is worth around $48,478 billion in 2020, which seems massive but is actually a decline from 2019 when the wholesale industry was worth $48,761 billion. I'm sure you'll know that the reason for this decline is the Covid-19 pandemic which has wreaked havoc across the world, and sent most countries across the world into either a recession or a depression. As travel was banned both domestically and especially internationally, the global supply chain was devastated which has led to a contraction in most industries and economies, and wholesalers of course are involved in most industries and hence, have had to face the effect as well.
    xxx/ellauri209.html on line 93: Easily topping the list of the 5 biggest companies that don’t pay taxes is Amazon, which is among the largest companies in the world in 2021. As I mentioned earlier, for many years Amazon was not profitable and made huge losses as it made inroads into the e-commerce market and gained a major market share by using extremely low prices as a strategy. This has allowed the company to use the tax losses from those years which are brought forward against any income earned and hence, avoid paid taxes even though they have an income of more than $10 billion.
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 73: All evidence points to the fact that Gauguin might have been drawn to the Mahu culture of a boy performing feminine duties. Drag queens were prevalent in Tahitian culture one which drew the focus of Gauguin. His children are not the reason to believe that he was heterosexual look at his Polynesian artwork!
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 77: His novels were admired by the author Somerset Maugham. A few years after Lodwick's death, Anthony Burgess wrote: "He is not afraid of rhetoric, grandiloquence; his knowledge of foreign literature is wide; his mastery of the English language matches Evelyn Waugh's." He warned, nevertheless, that because of his early death he was "in danger of being neglected", and indeed D. J. Taylor has written that in the post-war years Lodwick's "doomy romanticism sat queerly alongside the comic realism of a Waterhouse or an Amis: Lodwick's reputation did not survive the 1960s."
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 81: Lodwick omistaa kirjan Georges Pelorsonille (Belmont), faschistimieliselle kollaboraattorille josta tuli brittikynäilijöiden ranskantaja. Georges kuoli vasta sadannella vuodellaan 2008.
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 127: Guanyin, Guan Yin or Kuan Yin (/ˌɡwɑːnˈjɪn/) (traditional Chinese: 觀音; simplified Chinese: 观音; pinyin: Guānyīn) is the Buddhist bodhisattva associated with compassion. She is the East Asian equivalent of Avalokiteśvara (Sanskrit: अवलोकितेश्वर), and has been adopted by other Eastern religions including Chinese folk religion.She was first given the appellation of "goddess of mercy" or the "mercy goddess" by Jesuit missionaries in China. The Chinese name Guanyin is short for Guanshiyin, which means "Perceives the Sounds of the World."
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 190: Kakeru in this context means to shower or pour. The word bukkake is often used in Japanese to describe pouring out a liquid with sufficient momentum to cause splashing or spilling. Indeed, bukkake is used in Japan to describe a type of dish where hot broth is poured over noodles, as in bukkake udon and bukkake soba.
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 303: Tässä syyteröväskästä viimeisin: in February 2022, around a dozen current and former employees of Dr. Phil alleged that they experienced "verbal abuse in a workplace that fosters fear, intimidation, and racism." Seven current employees also claimed that the show's guests are often manipulated and treated unethically. Attorneys for McGraw and his co-producer, Carla Pennington categorically denied every allegation made.
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 305: McGraw's advice and methods have drawn criticism from both fellow psychotherapists as well as non-experts. McGraw's critics regard advice given by him to be at best simplistic and at worst ineffective or harmful. The National Alliance on Mental Illness called McGraw's conduct in one episode of his television show "unethical" and "incredibly irresponsible". McGraw said in a 2001 Sun-Sentinel interview that he never liked traditional one-on-one counseling, and that "I'm not the Hush-Puppies, pipe and 'Let's talk about your mother' kind of psychologist."
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 307: McGraw married his first wife, Debbie Higgins McCall, in 1970, when he was 20 years old. According to her, McGraw was domineering and would not allow her to participate in the family business. She claimed that she was confined to domestic duties and instructed to begin lifting weights to improve her bustline. McCall also claimed that infidelity had ended their marriage.
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 413: The painter — whose real name was Balthasar Klossowski de Rola and who died in 2001 — has been a controversial figure in the art world for decades. Many of his paintings show highly sexualized depictions of young girls. His 1934 work "The Guitar Lesson" was one of his first to scandalize his peers. When it was displayed along with "Thérèse Dreaming" and other Balthus paintings at a special exhibit in the Met in 2013, a plaque warned readers that the paintings were disturbing in nature.
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 425: "Thérèse Dreaming," which was finished in 1938, was Balthus's first painting of an underage model, according to the Village Voice. Balthus toned down the eroticism in his paintings later in his career, but he remained defensive of it: ''I really don't understand why people see the paintings of girls as Lolitas,'' he told the New York Times in 1996. ''My little model is absolutely untouchable to me." For all his artwork, Balthus's biographies and obituaries haven't published evidence of pedophilia in his personal life. Maybe his wee pencil was too shy to actually intrude inside his underage models. I bet he went afterward into the toilet with the canvas. Tai size taas vaan valehteli raukka nälissään, se oli ashkenazi jutku äiskän puolelta ja valehteli siitäkin. Toi kitaraa soittava ämmäoletettu on äijän izensä näköinen, mahtaisiko olla se Dorotea Spiro äitykkä. Sen veli oli jonkin sortin filosofi ja markiisi de Sade fänittäjä. Varmaan äiskä piti niitä pahoin ja niistä tuli jotain pervoja. Niljakasta porukkaa.
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 434: the family in scenes of his 1929 novel Les Enfants
    xxx/ellauri212.html on line 442: say that his first language was English, although his
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 127: From the start, critics complained about the ostensible sameness of Roth’s books, their narcissism and narrowness—or, as he himself put it, comparing his own work to his father’s conversation, “Family, family, family, Newark, Newark, Newark, Jew, Jew, Jew.”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 131: It wasn’t until “The Ghost Writer,” in 1979, that Roth regained his footing. Zuckerman, Roth’s most Roth-like surrogate, was a perfectly pitched instrument. The costs of radical freedom—the challenge of grappling openly, outrageously, with even the ugliest impulses of life—became a subject of his work.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 133: Kleinschmidt published a journal article in which he describes the case of a “successful Southern playwright” with an overbearing mother: “His rebellion was sexualized, leading to compulsive masturbation which provided an outlet for a myriad of hostile fantasies. These same masturbatory fantasies he both acted out and channeled into his writing.”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 137: “A fiction writer’s life is his treasure, his ore, his savings account, his jungle gym,” he wrote. “As long as I am alive, I don’t want somebody else playing on my jungle gym—disturbing my aborted children, quizzing my ex-wife, bugging my present wife, seeking for Judases among my friends, rummaging through yellowing old clippings, quoting in extenso bad reviews I would rather forget, and getting everything slightly wrong.”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 139: Various rabbis and Jewish community leaders accused Roth of cultural treason. “What is being done to silence this man?” Emanuel Rackman, the president of the Rabbinical Council of America, wrote. “Medieval Jews would have known what to do with him.”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 143: In 1961 Roth visited Bernard Malamud in Oregon. Roth was still in his twenties and had just published his first book of stories, Goodbye, Columbus. Malamud was almost 50 and one of the most famous writers in America. This meeting was immortalised in one of Roth’s greatest books, The Ghost Writer. In this 1979 work, a young writer, Nathan Zuckerman, visits EI Lonoff, a first-generation immigrant modelled on Malamud, who found a new voice for Jewish-American literature. He had found a voice but, more importantly, he had a subject: “life-hunger, life-bargains, and life-terror”—a Jewish experience rooted in the traumas of east Europe and Russia.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 145: There is a third novelist in The Ghost Writer, Felix Abravanel, “a writer who found irresistible all vital and dubious types, not excluding the swindlers of both sexes who trampled upon the large hearts of his optimistic, undone heroes.” Abravanel, of course, is Saul Bellow. Zuckerman heard him speak at Chicago, just as the young Roth had recently met Bellow in Chicago at a literature class.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 149: Hölmö Hope silittää Lonoffia myötäkarvaan kuin Tiina Salmi Jönsiä, kunnes hermot pettää ja alkaa tiskit lennellä. She can glue this. Vaimo osas liimata kaiken muttei osannut tehdä artistimiestä onnellisexi. Mitä vittua.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 154: Jewish writer with spectacles on the nose, autumn in his heart and menstrual blood on his penis. Especially fond of Charlie Chaplin's comedies.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 155: In 1942, Malamud met Ann De Chiara (November 1, 1917 – March 20, 2007), an Italian-American Roman Catholic, and a 1939 Cornell University graduate. They married on November 6, 1945, despite the opposition of their respective parents. Ann typed his manuscripts and reviewed his writing. Ann and Bernard had two children, Paul (b. 1947) and Janna (b. 1952). Janna is the author of a memoir about her father, titled My Father Is A Book.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 167: In the best essay ever written on Saul Bellow, Philip Roth wrote that his friend "managed brilliantly to close the gap between Thomas Mann and Damon Runyon". Bellow indeed brought together the teeming, busy world of post-war America, with its wise-guys, money men and "reality instructors", and the high seriousness of old Europe.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 171: "Vulgar Chicago" was always where his heart was. Vulgar Jewish Chicago - and Montreal, where he started out as son of an immigrant small time hustler.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 188: James Francis Durante (/dəˈrænti/ də-RAN-tee, Italian: [duˈrante]; February 10, 1893 – January 29, 1980) was an American actor, comedian, singer, vaudevillian, and pianist. His distinctive gravelly speech, Lower East Side accent, comic language-butchery, jazz-influenced songs, and prominent nose helped make him one of America's most familiar and popular personalities of the 1920s through the 1970s. He often referred to his nose as the schnozzola (Italianization of the American Yiddish slang word schnoz, meaning "big nose"), and the word became his nickname.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 192: Why is it, asked the teareyed history marm, that us goyim have always hated you mockies so much? Ask them not me says Amy. Well because you guys keep to your own company, are greedy as all hell and think you're better than us rest, though it was you guys who got your brother Christ nailed on The Cross and got $30 for the job.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 198: Rothista parasta Annessa oli ezen porukat oli niin epäjutkuja. Et vainoomiseen riitti pelkkä suspekti nimi syntymätodistuxessa. Eurooppalaisuudesta ei ollut mitään apua. Oliskohan ollut tehokkaammasta verensekoituxesta vuosituhansien aikana? Ehkäpä mutta siihenhän ne ei halua ize suurin surminkaan lähteä. Ne nimenomaan haluaa uida omassa geenipuulissa kuin Roope hrahahlaarissa. Kaivautua siihen kuin myyrät. Ne on tosi rasisteja.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 200: "Amy" Rothia ei nappaa kansanparannustyö, vaan kosto. Kirveellä päähän niinkö Lisbet Salander isäpapalle. Mutta kenelle? Turhaa pelleilyä, mutta ach niin jutkua. Talmud on täynnä kostotoimia, se on Jahven puuhista ihan rakkainta.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 206: Oh, Berny, I want to live with you! That's what I need! The millions won't do it-it's you! I want to go home to Europe with you. Listen to me, don't say no, not yet. This summer I saw a small house free, a stone villa up on a hillside. It was outside Florence. I had a pink tile roof and a garden. I got the phone number and I wrote it down. I still have it. Oh, everything beautiful that I saw in Italy made me think of how happy you could be there - how happy I would be there looking after you. I thought of the trips we'd make, I thought of the afternoons in the museums and having coffee later by the river. I thought of listening to music together at night I thought of making your meals. I thought of wearing lovely nightgowns to bed. And best of all (though Phil left this out): mieti miten huokaisen vienosti kun ähkäisten iltaisin työnnät pitkäxi venähtäneen pinokkionnenäsi sieraimia myöden turkissomisteiseen skulausvihkooni!
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 227: Esittelyn kärjessä Cipolla kutsuu Marion ja saa aikaisemmin manipuloidulta nuorelta mieheltä tietää, että hänellä on sydänvaivoja Silvestra-nimisen tytön takia. Mario näyttää todella olevan tuskissa. Cipolla saa hänet uskomaan olevansa tuo tyttö ja pyytää häntä suudelemaan häntä takaposkelle, minkä hän tekee. Kun Mario huomaa, kauhistuneena ja peloissaan, missä tilanteessa hän on, hän pakenee paikalta ja palaa sitten aseella, jolla hän tappaa Cipollan.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 364: Alexander Stubb who has had direct experience with Putin and Russia, comments on the situation says, "The first argument is that Russia could not help itself. Russia has already been an expansionist and aggressive state. Unlike eg. Greece, Italy, Sweden, Britain, France, Germany and the U.S.A. You have to understand Russia's history to understand where Russia is coming from. ... Russia believes in destiny, there is a certain nostalgia and narrative of it’s expansionist past, which previously made Russia into a great superpower. So the argument that Russia is somehow working to defend itself from Ukraine doesn’t stand up. Russia could not help itself. Its like bulimia. There was absolutely no reason for Russia to attack. Russia just doesn't like capitalist democratic neighbors, just like America does not like communists, and the only one they allow to exist is Finland, which is insignificant. For the rest they think of spheres of interest and power, like the Chinamen."
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 370: That was only a pretext for a way of life he rejects. He rejected it in Chechnya and Syria (where men wear skirts) and he rejects liberal democracy at every turn and he saw Ukraine moving in that direction. And to top it off, Putin yearns for respect and wants to be seen as a great leader although he is shorter than me, in shorts or without. He thought he could do exactly the same thing in Ukraine as he did with Georgia, Chechnya and Crimea. But no, this time is different, we Westerners really want Ukraina."
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 372: "Point number three (ok, almost done) is the talk about the Finlandization of Ukraine, which means that Ukraine has to compromise on their values, security and basic existence in order to achieve peace. I fundamentally disagree with this thesis because every independent and sovereign state should have the freedom to choose whose club it wants to join and which cola to buy.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 374: This has been put into the UN charters, but more specifically to the Helsinki accords. It is about international law. It is about sovereignty and independence. Sovereignty and independence is what NATO is all about. It is about the agency of a country like Ukraine to decide its own destiny. It is not up to a greater power like Russia or NATO to take that decision for Ukraine. And I say this as a Swedish Finn, next to Russia in Westend, Esbo, which shares a 1,34 km border with the capital. A county that has had to compromise on its basic economic liberal values at different stages in history.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 376: This is not a world where the big can rule over the small. What the world needs to see is a game rules-based international order where all of us can at least believe that we stick to the rules, the U.S. rules which Russia is not sticking to at the moment.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 378: Ukraine declared what it wanted in the Orange revolution in 2003-2004 with the Maidan demonstrations (never mind the parliament), with the dignity demonstrations, with the creamy arse demonstrations; and, the last thing that Ukraine should do at this stage or should have done in the beginning would have been to give up. Just like the Washington demonstrations proved whom the yankees want for president.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 380: The only thing that Putin and Russia understands is Western hitech power weapons pointed at their arses, and that is why Ukraine is doing exactly the right thing to spearhead the attack of a greater power (NATO) on a smaller one (Russia) as a human shield operated by NATO. Ukraine should not be Finlandized, unless of course it means NATO and EU membership and capitalism and globalization, or it should not be subdued to Russia in any way whatsoever. It does not stand at fault in this conflict. The only place to blame is the Kremlin."
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 382: "The fourth claim (oops, my bad, I lost count) is that this conflict is due to NATO expansion. NATO was originally created in 1949 as a deterrent to the Soviet Union. But when the Cold War ended, it took on a different tact, which was about peace keeping and crisis management, primarily, robbing the ragheads of their oil.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 384: Countries that were not members could partner with them, like Finland. There was also close partnership with the Russian council in NATO, so there was this cooperation. NATO enlargement took place because Soviet satellites during the cold war wanted to get that extra protection and for fully understandable reason, what with Reagan's plans for Star Wars. But that expansion was not aggressive. NATO has never attacked another country. Iraq, Libya, Sudan etc etc did not involve NATO in the least.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 386: Its mere existence has been a guarantee for peace. Now Putin has used NATO expansion as an excuse. But remember, he attacked Georgia after Gruzia started it and created the frozen conflict, only a few months after the NATO summit in Bucharest in 2008. That too had nothing to do with NATO. It had much more to do with an expansionist Russia and Putin who wanted to create their own spheres of interest and cause insecurity around his neighborhood. As if one big Western sphere of interest would not be enough globally.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 388: In 2008 when Putin attacked Georgia, George Bush and Condoleezza Rice came out onto the Whitehouse lawn and said, "We will help Georgia, we will back them up." And what happened? We got a ceasefire agreement in 5 days. In 2014 when Putin attacked Crimea, Obama was pivoting towards Asia and it wasn’t about Russia; and, Obama said we weren't going to intervene in Crimea. But of course in this case he got it wrong, he was just a dumb coon and a democrat to boot. The message that Putin got was completely the opposite that's why he attacked the Donbas because he thought that the reaction of the EU and US would be the same. He is almost as dumb as me, and I'm an ass in shorts."
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 390: "The fifth claim (sorry folks) is about the US and EU projecting power onto Russia. Remember that the EU has worked on two premises - Idealism and Realism. HOOHOO, this is getting too hilarious. Idealism because we wanted to create closer relations with Russia, otherwise we would not have created a level of energy dependency on Russia like we have and trying to accommodate Russia with cooperation in the EU; and, Russia has not been aggressive about EU expansion as such.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 392: The Realism part is that if things did happen as it did in Georgia, Crimea and now Ukraine, you need security and that's where NATO comes into play when it comes to security. There was also an attempt to accommodate Russia into the WTO into G8. But it wasn't possible. Why? Because Russia unfortunately was too poor, and under current leadership is another imperialist and expansionist power. We can accommodate just one at one time. This war is not the fault of the US. It is not the fault of the EU. It is not the fault of Ukraine. Its not my fault, or Westend's for that matter. There is only 1 person and 1 country that can be blamed for this attack no matter what kind of theoretical framework you put around it and that is Putin and Russia."
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 394: "And this brings me to my conclusion. I’m a strong believer in academic freedom (BUAHAHAHA, stop, you're killing me!) and open debate. I’m somewhat worried coming from a country that lives next to Russia and have been attacked by the Soviet Union and had to survive WW2 as a Soviet neighbor and have had to lose my summerhouse in Porckala to the Soviet Union, that academics make claims that simply are untrue and it doesn’t help if you quote documentation and skew it in a certain direction… more important than international relations theory is the reality of what is happening on the ground.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 396: And when I try to describe a reality that simply does not exist, it can lead to false assumptions that can lead to false conclusions which can lead to the loss of life and summerhouse. I say this as someone who has been in the war and have been on the battle field meditating the peace. The real reason for Putin's attack is threefold (three points only, phew!)
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 402: iii) Primate affairs. This conflict is not only about Ukraine or the future of Russia, it is a crazy east-west gallop on the last lap of simian life on the planet."
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 413: Aminatu (also Amina; died 1610) was a Hausa (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hausa_people) Muslim (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim) historical figure in the city-state (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hausa_Kingdoms) Zazzau (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zazzau) (present-day city of Zaria (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaria) in Kaduna State (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaduna_State)), in what is now in the north-west region of Nigeria (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeria). She might have ruled in the mid-sixteenth century. A controversial figure whose existence has been questioned by some historians, her real biography has been somewhat obscured by subsequent legends and folk tales.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 419: After the death of her parents in or around 1566, Amina's brother became king of Zazzau. At this point, Amina had distinguished herself as a "leading warrior in her brother's cavalry" and gained notoriety for her military skills. She is still celebrated today in traditional Hausa praise songs as "Amina daughter of Nikatau, a woman as capable as a man that was able to lead men to war."
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 428: historyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/amazones_dahomey.jpg" />
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 442: WEDNESDAY, April 13, 2022 (HealthDay News) -- The more orgasms you have, the more you come to expect. And the reverse is also true, according to a new study of the so-called orgasm gap -- in which men climax far more often than their female partners. Haha of course, when the male comes, its GAME OVER, and it takes just 5 to 40 thrusts! "Our expectations are shaped by our experiences, so when women orgasm less, they will desire and expect to orgasm less," said study author Grace Wetzel, a doctoral student in social psychology at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J. "If women lower their expectations in this way, the more orgasm inequality may perpetuate in relationship," she said in a Rutgers news release. What else is new? How many times female orgasm is mentioned in Talmud?
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 451: “A man is forbidden to compel his wife to have marital relations…Rabbi Joshua ben Levi similarly stated: Whosoever compels his wife to have marital relations will have unworthy children.”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 454: “Rabbi Joshua ben Levi said: Whosoever knows his wife to be a God‑fearing woman and does not duly visit her is called a sinner.”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 460: “There must be close bodily contact during sex. This means that a husband must not treat his wife in the manner of the Persians, who perform their marital duties in their clothes. This provides support for the ruling of Rav Huna who ruled that a husband who says, ‘I will not perform my marital duties unless she wears her clothes and I mine,’ must divorce her and give her also her settlement [the monetary settlement agreed to in the marriage contract].”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 463: “Since a man’s wife is permitted to him, he may act with her in any manner whatsoever. He may have intercourse with her whenever he so desires and kiss any organ of her body he wishes, and he may have intercourse with her naturally or unnaturally [traditionally, this refers to anal and oral sex], provided that he does not expend semen to no purpose. Nevertheless, it is an attribute of piety that a man should not act in this matter with levity and that he should sanctify himself at the time of intercourse.”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 466: “Rav Hisda ruled: A man is forbidden to perform his marital duty in the daytime, for it is said, ‘And thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself’ (Leviticus 19:18). But what is the proof? Abaye replied: He might observe something repulsive in her, and she would thereby become loathsome to him.”
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 477: "Importantly, this is a gender equality issue," she said. "Women are learning to expect and be satisfied with no less than a vaginal orgasm their sexual interactions with men."
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 482: These findings suggest that orgasm inequality likely worsens rather than improves within a relationship when women climax less often than their male partner and then place less importance this kind of sexual pleasure. The Rutgers authors said it's important to increase women's expectations for and entitlement to orgasm during sex with men in order to break this cycle.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 485: Lesbian sex is a safer bet if the goal is female satisfaction, as the partner is not out just to get their own 5 strokes in. It takes just 4 minutes to come if you know what you're doing, like DIY. But Darwinian chances for procreation hit an all time low in this scenario.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 487: Maybe, but this argument is outdated and completely irrelevant! Jehovan käsky on jo täytetty, maa vilisee jo pikku kärppiä. Mixi Grace valkkasi noin tätimäiset housut esitelmäasuxi? Eikös aiheeseen olis sopineet reikäiset farkut jotka kaivautuvat pillurakoon? Noihan raidalliset lökäpöxyt on yhtä sexikkäät kuin Lealla.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 495: Wetzel seems to be a pet form (affectionate variant) of Wenzel.This unusual surname was developed from the German (male) personal name 'Wenzel', a diminutive form of the German given name 'Wenze', with the diminutive suffix '-el'. The origin of the personal name is Czechoslovakian, 'Wenze' being a borrowed form of the Old Czech personal name 'Veceslav', in modern Czech 'Vaclav', which in its Anglicized form is 'Wenceslas'. The name is composed of the elements 'vece', greater, and 'slav', glory, and was borne by a 10th Century duke of bohemia who fought against a revival of paganism in this territory, and after his death became patron saint of Bohemia.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 497: They may have died alone, but they were buried together, in a mass grave, and were honored together this week in an interfaith ceremony that has been an annual ritual in Los Angeles for more than a century.
    xxx/ellauri215.html on line 504: The county does not have to do this, but the tradition, which dates back to 1896, has become a sacred event for the many county workers — coroners, researchers — whose job it is to investigate how people die in Los Angeles. Their work is a long process of figuring out who these people were, and if there are loved ones looking for them. Nearly all of the forgotten Angelenos honored this year died in 2015, and in most cases a relative was found but for whatever reason — financial hardship, estrangement — they did not want to claim the remains.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 44: A skeleton parodies human happiness by playing a hurdy-gurdy while the wheels of his cart crush a man as if his life is of no importance. As if? The skeletons are winning. The hurdy-gurdy is a string instrument that produces sound by a hand-crank-turned, rosined wheel rubbing against the strings. The wheel functions much like a violin bow, and single notes played on the instrument sound similar to those of a violin.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 89: Among the writers DeLillo read and was inspired by in this period were James Joyce, William Faulkner, Flannery O'Connor, and Ernest Hemingway, who was a major influence on DeLillo's earliest attempts at writing in his late teens. Sen voi hyvin uskoa. Kuka himskatin Flannery? Ai tää:
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 106: Since 1945, the United States has very rarely achieved meaningful victory. The United States has fought five major wars — Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan — and only the Gulf War in 1991 can really be classified as a clear success. A month into his presidency, Donald Trump lamented that the US no longer wins wars as it once did.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 114: “We’re still stuck in this view that war is like the Super Bowl: We meet on the field, both sides have uniforms, we score points, someone wins, and when the game ends you go home,”
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 121: As they advanced rapidly through southern Iraq in the first three days, the Shia population should have danced with joy at the very sight of the Bradley fighting vehicles. Not! Simultaneously, the never failing US technology, having located the demon in chief in one of his lairs, would dispatch the hated Saddam. The missile hit the target, but Saddam wasn’t home.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 123: So, the government which was supposed to fall didn’t. As a result, Iraq’s little boys and girls and men and women of all ages didn’t shower kisses on US troops as they freed successive cities and finally Baghdad. During this piece of cake triumph, the "coalition forces" might lose a few troops to accidents and friendly fire like in Grenada, Bosnia and even Afghanistan, but the Iraqis wouldn’t really fight. Thus, we would not have a serious casualty count on our side and attribute a limited number of Iraqi civilian deaths to the cause of freedom itself. The United States would show off the tens of thousands of cowardly Iraqi POWs who surrendered without firing a shot.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 125: Bush and Rumsfeld obviously believed in this Gulf War 2 scenario. They sneered at the nay-saying generals who demanded more troops and reinforcements to besiege Baghdad. Rummy felt certain that air strikes, with high tech bombs and guided missiles, would more than suffice. They knew, from their studies of selected books and articles written by their ideological neo-con mentors that the Iraqis would surrender rather than fight after US explosives showed them our power; so why the need for all those troops! The brilliant advisers, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, recently resigned as Defense Advisory Board Chief, and other intellectuals had spun a convincing tale, one that included the oft-referenced domino theory. They convinced the lesser IQs like Rummy who in turn convinced the even more intellectually challenged president.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 142: Donnie Ray Moore (February 13, 1954 – July 18, 1989) was an American relief pitcher in Major League Baseball (MLB) who played for the Chicago Cubs (1975, 1977–79), St. Louis Cardinals (1980), Milwaukee Brewers (1981), Atlanta Braves (1982–84) and California Angels (1985–88). Moore is best remembered for the home run he gave up to Dave Henderson while pitching for the California Angels in Game 5 of the 1986 American League Championship Series. With only one more strike needed to clinch the team's first-ever pennant, he allowed the Boston Red Sox to come back and eventually win the game. Boston then won Games 6 and 7 to take the series. Shortly after his professional career ended, he shot his wife three times in a dispute, failed to finish her and then committed suicide. Kylmä olen sitten huono. En osu edes omaan päähäni. Kierot palefacet puhuvat tyhmän Simson-nekrun ympäri. Hyvässä sovussa lähdetään ottelusta autolle.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 144: The Honeymooners is an American television sitcom which originally aired from 1955 to 1956, created by and starring Jackie Gleason, and based on a recurring comedy sketch of the same name that had been part of Gleason's variety show. It follows the lives of New York City bus driver Ralph Kramden (Gleason), his wife Alice (Audrey Meadows), Ralph's best friend Ed Norton (Art Carney) and Ed's wife Trixie (Joyce Randolph) as they get involved with various schemes in their day-to-day living.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 146: Most episodes revolve around Ralph's poor choices in absurd dilemmas which frequently show his judgmental attitude in a comedic tone. The show occasionally features more serious issues such as women's rights and social status.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 148: Ralph is frustrated by his lack of success and often develops get-rich-quick schemes. He is very short-tempered, frequently resorting to bellowing, insults, and hollow threats. Well hidden beneath the many layers of bluster, however, is a softhearted man who loves his wife and is devoted to his best pal, Ed Norton. Ralph enjoys bowling and playing pool; he's proficient at both, and he is an enthusiastic member of the Loyal Order of Raccoons (although in several episodes a blackboard at the lodge lists his dues as being in arrears).
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 150: Ralph was the inspiration for the animated character Fred Flintstone. Alice (née Alice Gibson), played in the first nine skits from 1951 to January 1952 by Pert Kelton, and by Audrey Meadows for all remaining episodes, is Ralph's patient but sharp-tongued wife of 14 years. She often finds herself bearing the brunt of Ralph's tantrums and demands, which she returns with biting sarcasm. She is levelheaded, in contrast to Ralph's pattern of inventing various schemes to enhance his wealth or his pride. She sees his schemes' unworkability, but he becomes angry and ignores her advice (and by the end of the episode, her misgivings almost always prove correct). She has grown accustomed to his empty threats—such as "One of these days, POW!!! Right in the kisser!", "BANG, ZOOM!" or "You're going to the Moon!"— to which she usually replies, "Ahhh, shaddap!" Alice runs the finances of the Kramden household, and Ralph frequently has to beg her for money to pay for his lodge dues or crazy schemes. Alice studied to be a secretary before her marriage and works briefly in that capacity when Ralph is laid off. Wilma Flintstone is based on Alice Kramden.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 224: Lillon mielestä kylmä sota piti porukoita kurissa, kun se päättyi kaikki alkoi levitä kuin ellun kanat. Ja sitten tuli 60-luvun kullitus. Viestintätekniikka on puolessa vuosisadassa miniatyrisoitunut, mutta lyhyt matka apinan korvien välissä ei ole mixkään muuttunut. Lillo oli mennyt pöljän Fukujaman lankaan luulemaan, että Njeuvostoliiton kaatuminen olisi historian loppu. Ei se ollut. Ei historia lopu ennenkuin sulamavesi lurahtaa sisään vihonviimeisen termiitin snorkkelista. Luonnonhistoria jatkaa siitä sitten taas eteenpäin.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 230: The aptly named Fresh Kills landfill opened in 1948 as a temporary landfill, but by 1955 it had become the largest landfill in the world, and it remained so until its closure in 2001. At the peak of its operation, in 1986, Fresh Kills received 29,000 tons of residential waste per day, playing a key part in the New York City waste management system. From 1991 until its closing it was the only landfill to accept New York City's residential waste. It consists of four mounds which range in height from 90 to about 225 feet (30 to about 70 m) and hold about 150 million tons of solid waste. The archaeologist Martin Jones characterizes it as "among the largest man-made structures in the history of the world."
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 232: Initially, the land where the landfill was located was a salt marsh in which there were tidal wetlands, forests, and freshwater wetlands. The subsoil was made up of clay, with sand and silt as the top layer of soil. The tidal marsh, which helped to clean and oxygenate the water that passed through it, was destroyed by the dump. The fauna were largely replaced by herring gulls. The native plant species were driven out by the common reed, a grass which grows abundantly in disturbed areas and can tolerate both fresh and brackish water. The stagnant, deoxygenated water was also less attractive to waterfowl, and their population decreased. Samuel Kearing, who had served as sanitation commissioner under Mayor John V. Lindsay, remembered in 1970 his first visit to the Fresh Kills project:
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 238: From 1987 through 1988, in an environmental disaster known as the syringe tide, significant amounts of medical waste from the Fresh Kills landfill, including hypodermic syringes and raw garbage, washed up onto beaches on the Jersey Shore, in New York City, and on Long Island. This event forced the closing of beaches on the Atlantic coast.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 244: After the September 11, 2001 attacks, Fresh Kills was temporarily re-opened to be used as a sorting ground for roughly one-third of the rubble from Ground Zero. More than 1,600 personal effects were retrieved during this time. About 1.6 million tons of material obtained from Ground Zero was taken to the landfill for sorting.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 246: Thousands of detectives and forensic evidence specialists worked for over 1.7 million hours at Fresh Kills Landfill to try to recover remnants of the people killed in the attacks. A final count of 4,257 human remains was retrieved, but only 300 people could be reconstructed from these remains. A memorial was built in 2011, which also honors those whose identities were not able to be determined from the debris. The remaining waste was buried in a 40-acre (160,000 m2) portion of the landfill; it is highly likely that this debris still contains fragmentary human remains like condoms, false teeth and pacemakers.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 254: Three Mile Islandin ydinvoimalaonnettomuus, joka tapahtui 28. maaliskuuta 1979 Three Mile Islandin ydinvoimalassa ollessani siinä lähimaisemissa, lähellä Harrisburgin kaupunkia Pennsylvanian osavaltiossa Yhdysvalloissa, on historian neljänneksi pahin ydinonnettomuus Tšernobylin, Kyštymin ja Fukushiman onnettomuuden jälkeen. Onnettomuus on sijoitettu luokkaan 5 kansainvälisellä ydinlaitostapahtumien IINES-asteikolla laitokselle aiheutuneen merkittävän materiaalisen vahingon vuoksi; ydinvoimalan kakkosyksikön (TMI-2) suklaasydän särkyi ja osittain suli onnettomuudessa. Onnettomuusyksikkö ehti olla käytössä alle vuoden.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 265: Kyštymin ydinonnettomuus on maailmanhistorian kolmanneksi pahin ydinonnettomuus ja oli siihenastisista pahin. Laitoksessa tapahtui 29. syyskuuta 1957 voimakas räjähdys jätesäiliössä, jossa oli korkearadioaktiivista jätettä. Tapahtuma tunnetaan Kyštymin onnettomuutena, ja saastuneesta alueesta on myöhemmin käytetty nimitystä "Kyštymin hiilijalanjälki". Räjähdys johtui säiliön jäähdytysjärjestelmän viasta. Ne rabotajet.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 275: Tää on kyllä paikoitellen hyvää ajankuvaa, suht tuoreita klisheitä. Kun Matty oli hyvin pieni, hänen veljellään oli tapana istua pytyllä ja lukea sarjakuvia tenavayleisölleen, naapurin neljä ja viisivuotiaille lapsille, joita jonkun lähistöllä olevan aikuisen olisi kuulunut pitää silmällä, ja Matty seisoi ovensuussa valmiina huutamaan varoitussanan tulee, ja Nick istuu pytyllä ja lukee Captain Marvelia tai Targeteersia housut polvien varassa roikkuen, ja hän esitti vuoropuhelun elävästi, paasaten ja elehtien, matkien uskottavasti rosvojen ja naisten ääntä ja päästäen lyhyen vihlovan kiljaisun kuvatessaan, miten gangsteriautot vetivät kaarteet tiukasti öisillä ajomatkoillaan, säikäytti joskus lapset eläytyvällä tyylillään, vaikeni päästääkseen paskapökäleen joka putosi loiskahtaen, molskahti veteen, se oli maailman hulluin ääni ja nostatti hänen kuulijoidensa kasvoille onnellisen kunnioittavan ilmeen - se oli kaikkein värisyttävin ilonaihe, parempi kuin mikään mitä hän sai sarjakuvasivuilta irti. Jepjep italialaiskortteleita Bronxissa 50-luvulla. Tiina ja Jössi kasteli maalla pakettinappuloita posliiniseen pissapottaan ja käskivät mun maistella ja imuskella, tämo hyvvee!
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 320: My wife helped remove his fillings as a dental assistant in the Lancaster-Palmdale area of California around 1971. He scheduled his appointments so no one other than his entourage would be in waiting room with him.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 322: Bobby Fischer changed the world! I believe he inherited some family mental disorders, and had deep issues regarding his father (as you may or may not know, Mr. Fischer was not his real father - his real father was a Hungarian (I believe a physicist) to whom Bobby bore an amazing resemblance! His BBC accent was just too good, so he must be a - Hungarian!
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 324: Spassky was a chess gentleman compared to Bobby, a genius who couldn't tie his own shoes. He went around applauding 9/11, and wanting to commit genocide.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 326: Fischer: Yes this is all wonderful news, it is time that the fucking Jews get their heads kicked in. It's time to finish off the US once and for all. ...Everybody knows how you ... how you..uh
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 336: Fischer: Yeah. Nobody here gives a shit about the Japanese. How many hundreds of thousand people did the US kill with the atom bombs , justifying it with the most ridiculous excuse that it saved millions American soldiers, when Japan would gonna surrender in a few weeks or month or so anyway. Right? The United State is based on lies, is based on theft. Look what I have done for the US. Nobody has single handily done more for the US them me, I really believe in this. When I won the World Championship in 1972, the United States had an image of ,you know, a football country, baseball country, but nobody thought of it as an intellectual country. I turned all that around single handily, right? But I was useful then because it was the cold war, right? But now I'm not useful anymore, you see, the cold war is over and now they want to wipe me out, get everything I have, put me into prison.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 338: You have to go back to the root of history of the country, look at the history of the country. Get something for nothing. Take and kill. Rob the country, they don't come in a civilized manner and say we like to marry your women, and so on. No, they take your land and they kill you off. That's the history of the US. Why did the white man not come to America, like in a civilized manner, preaching freedom of religion, say we like to come here. We like to assimilate, we like to marry your women. But no, we take your land and kill you off , right? Bring over slaves from Africa. That's the history of the United States. A despicable country, you know. Even as a boy I never had the slightest interest in the history of the US, I knew their was something rotten in Denmark.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 341: The US just will not do what they have to do. The US has to say we're sorry, our whole foreign policy has been wrong for the last several hundred years, we are going to pull back all our troops from all over the world, we are not going stop support Israel and so on. But they only will say that this cowardly act will be punished.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 344: Democracy is just a load of bullshit, it is just a cover for the criminal nature of the United States of America. But I'm hoping for the Seven Days In May scenario, where sane people will take over the US, military people. They will imprison the Jews, they will execute several hundred thousand of them, at least. And they will bring home all the troops to the US. And ultimately the white man should leave the US, the black man should go back to Africa, the white back to Europe, and the country should be returned to the American Indians who lived there for, who knows how many, ten of thousands of years. They kept the land crystal clean. It was a beautiful country when the white man came. This is the future I would like to see for the so-called United States.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 347: Death to the US. They are the worst liars and bastards. This is a wonderful day.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 351: By the traditional definition of Judaism, everyone who has a Jewish mother is automatically Jewish. Which is all fine and well.But should the traditional definition apply in the case of Bobby Fischer? Once a brilliant chess champion, a transcendent genius, he descended into lunacy, claiming the Holocaust never happened, vindicating September 11 attacks, and denouncing his Jewish roots, even writing to the Encyclopedia Judaica asking for his name to be taken out.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 353: So what are we to do with this nut job? He clearly stated that he does not consider himself Jewish, so who are we to argue? Yet there she lingers, his Jewish mother…
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 366: The exhumation reportedly took place in the presence of a doctor, a priest and the local sheriff, Ólafur Helgi Kjartansson. Fischer was reburied after DNA samples were taken, at least according to Kjartansson. I bet they just left it lying there for the seagulls. Fischer died in Iceland in 2008, aged 64. He left no will and legal wrangling over his estate continues. This article is over 12 years old. The girl is over 21 years old by now.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 372: Hooray! We wouldn't have thought so, but this is Noam Chomsky! The father of modern linguistics! One of the most cited academics! Recently named the top living intellectual!
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 391: For according to Spassky himself, the rumors that his mother was Jewish were not true. And what's even worse, Spassky recently signed an antisemitic petition that called Judaism "inhumane", said its followers "committed ritual murders", and asked for an expulsion of Jewish organizations from Russia. Proving that even geniuses can be idiots.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 408: The northeast blackout of 1965 was a significant disruption in the supply of electricity on Tuesday, November 9, 1965, affecting parts of Ontario in Canada and Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont in the United States. In contrast to the wave of looting and other incidents that took place during the 1977 New York City blackout, only five reports of looting were made in New York City after the 1965 blackout. It was said to be the lowest amount of crime on any night in the city's history since records were first kept. Perhaps thanks to that more than 800,000 looters got trapped in the subway. The blackout that hit New York on July 13, 1977 was to many a metaphor for the gloom that had already settled on the city. An economic decline, coupled with rising crime rates and the panic-provoking (and paranoia-inducing) Son of Sam murders, had combined to make the late 1970s New York’s Dark Ages.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 420: The little blonde boy with the Dutch bang hair, the wide sailor cap and the big floppy bow collar became mascot to kids feet when he lent his image to the most famous children’s shoe company in the world, Buster Brown shoes.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 447: WW wrote: “There are 10,000 sanitation workers in New York City. They are asking for a $12 a week raise in pay. The total cost to the city would be about $6 million a year. … Last fall a little group of bankers convinced the city it needed ‘better subways’ and got a referendum passed to spend $2.5 billion for these allegedly better means of transport. This clique of bankers will supply the $2.5 billion of other people’s money for a price. They will rake off $125 million in tax-free interest each year for themselves and the city will pay it. That’s 21 times the $6 million the sanitation workers are asking for. And these bankers would never have to lift a garbage pail!”
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 456: Rockefeller flinched, saying: “The National Guard was used to break a strike in which a family corporation was involved when I was a child. Men and women were killed. … I will not use the National Guard.” Rockefeller was referring to the 1914 Ludlow massacre, when his grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, the owner of Colorado Fuel and Iron Company, got the Colorado governor to call in the National Guard to break a mine workers’ strike. The miners and their families were huddled in tents when the militia opened fire. Over 60 strikers and family members were shot dead or burned alive when their tents were set ablaze by the troops.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 459: A Workers World editorial named his real reason for sparing the sanitation workers: “Rockefeller refused to call the National Guard … because he was afraid to do so.” He had revealed his fear of labor’s strength in a Feb. 9 statement: “There are real risks as far as the stability and structure of organized labor and organized community are concerned.”
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 461: When the strike was finally settled, the union won a wage increase above the city’s offer: double-time pay for Sunday work and a 2.5 percent increase in the city’s contribution to their pension funds. Most of all, this was a victory for dignity and respect for the sanitation workers and for labor solidarity.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 463:
    And then — Memphis

    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 465: Two days after the NYC sanitation workers’ strike ended on Feb. 12, the predominantly African-American sanitation workers in Memphis, Tenn., went on strike. The union on the ground in the strike was AFSCME Local 1733. This was the famous “I Am a Man” strike, which the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was supporting when he was assassinated.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 467: On Feb. 1, two African-American sanitation workers, Echol Cole and Robert Walker, had been crushed to death in one of the city’s outdated trucks. Memphis had no facilities for Black workers to wash up, change clothes or get out of the rain. Cole and Walker were sheltering from the rain inside the truck’s barrel when the compacting mechanism malfunctioned. The truck hadn’t been repaired because the city wouldn’t spend money for safety for these workers.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 469: Only recently, after almost 50 years, did their families receive their pension benefits. Many U.S. unions held a national moment of silence this Feb. 1 to honor Cole and Walker.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 470: On the first day of the Memphis strike, the Memphis Press-Scimitar wrote: “The country has been astonished at the garbage mess in New York, but it might have known that the trouble there was catching. Memphis Public Works officials said flatly that the trouble here was triggered by the developments which brought the New York strikers pay increases.”
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 472: Jesse Epps, a veteran labor organizer involved in the Memphis strike, commented on the Memphis-New York connection. Epps, who was with Dr. King when he was killed on April 4, spoke to a 2008 New York City sanitation workers’ meeting. The workers were celebrating being the only NYC uniformed workers’ union to negotiate and win a Martin Luther King birthday holiday in their contract.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 473: Epps said: “It was you who gave [the Memphis sanitation workers] the courage to act. It was these men from New York, if I may use the colloquialism, that fired the shot and made [the U.S.] stand up and its conscience be pricked and compelled Dr. King and others like him to come into the fray.” (Workers World, Jan. 8, 2011) After the murder of Dr. King, oppressed communities in 110 U.S. cities rose up in rebellion.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 477: During the two years after the New York City and Memphis strikes, sanitation workers in Baltimore, Md.; Washington, D.C.; Charlotte, N.C.; Atlanta, Ga.; Miami and St. Petersburg, Fla.; and Corpus Christi, Texas, all went out on strike.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 481: The ruling class and the Trump administration are ramping up attacks on public sector workers and unions, the majority of whom are women and people of color. A negative ruling on Janus v. AFSCME, scheduled to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 26, could strike a financial blow at the ability of public sector unions to collect dues. As racist, sexist right-to-work backers spew their message supporting Janus, the U.S. labor movement is mobilizing resistance to this threat around the country, including a Feb. 24 NYC protest. We are not prepared to accept this assault on our rights without a fight!
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 502: Mitä tarkoitti kirjain F. Fred F. Frenchissä, kysyi Rochelle Abramowicz Klaaralta peukuntäyteisellä äänellä autossa kiimaisen pojan sormi pillussa ja molo poskessa. No Fillmore tietysti. He ratkesivat nauruun. Joku pieraisi. Kaikki huusi "Klaaraa"! Tää Klaara Kotko kumppaneineen on Löllön pitkästyttävintä antia.
    xxx/ellauri218.html on line 515: He was introduced to a little black chorus girl. The girl had written a song for Little Richard to record so she could pay the treatment for her ailing aunt Mary. The song, actually a few lines on a piece of paper, went like this:
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 62: Suuri alastomuus! Lue, naura ja kauhistu!
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 124: Moore had remarked only days earlier that: "I fully expect the Fox News Channel and other right-wing media to portray this as an award from the French. There was only one French citizen on the jury. Four out of nine were American. This is not a French award, it was given by an international jury dominated by Americans."The jury was made up of four North Americans (one of them born in Haiti), four Europeans, and one Asian. Some fucking expatriate commies, I bet.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 126: It received generally positive reviews from crickets, but it also generated intense controversy here on the right side of the puddle, including disputes over its fairness to Bush. The film became the highest-grossing documentary of its time (later surpassed by Michael Jackson's extremely important This Is It), grossing over $220 million. So it can't be all wrong!
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 147: This is a situation often found in Bellow’s work: the alliance between the shady millionaire and the intellectual. As a teenager, Trellman had been in love with Amy Wurstin, who had eventually chosen as her second husband Trellman’s best friend in high school, Jay Wurstin. Huom toisexi aviomiehexi, ei tää ole ihan se tavallinen tarina. Throughout the years, Harry Trellman had kept firm to the inner image of Amy in his mind even as he went through his varied career moves. Sitten kotirouviintunut Amy petti Jayta jonkun "Ankan" kanssa ja jäi erossa pennittömäxi. Siitä tuli sisustaja.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 149: After Jay Wurstin dies prematurely, he is buried in the cemetery plot originally reserved for Amy’s father, who had sold it to him years earlier. Now Amy wants to remove Jay’s body to the burial plot of his own family so that her father, who is still alive at an advanced age, can eventually be buried there, mikä on hyvin juutalainen juttu. In a limousine provided by Adletsky, Amy and Trellman disinter and rebury the body. Moved by this scene of cell death and urban renewal, Trellman confesses to Amy that he has always loved her, that he has what he terms an “actual affinity” for her (hence the title of the story). He then asks her to marry him. Teinityttönä Amy oli ollut hoikka hempeä olento. Nyt hiän oli vankka kuin tiilestä tehty paskahuusi. Hänen ainoa aarteensa oli tää Salen tolvana. Veistäisin paremman miehen puupalikasta. Samaa voisin sanoa eräistä Helmin poikaystävistä, mutten sano, koska Seija on kieltänyt. Tyydyn veistämään puupalikasta naishahmoja.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 178: He supported eugenics and served as one of 16 vice-presidents of the Eugenics Society from 1909 to 1912. In November 1891, at the age of 32, and reportedly still a virgin, Ellis married the English writer and proponent of women's rights Edith Lees. From the beginning, their marriage was unconventional, as Edith Lees was openly bisexual. At the end of the honeymoon, Ellis went back to his bachelor rooms in Paddington. She lived at Fellowship House. Their "open marriage" was the central subject in Ellis's autobiography, My Life. Ellis reportedly had an affair with Margit Spranger.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 180: According to Ellis in My Life, his friends were much amused at his being considered an expert on sex. Some knew that he reportedly suffered from impotence until the age of 60. He then discovered that he could become aroused by the sight of a woman urinating. Ellis named this "undienism". After his wife died, Ellis formed a relationship with a French woman, Françoise Lafitte. Nuuskutteli sitten fittenhajua Francoisen undieista.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 182: Ellis favoured feminism from a eugenic perspective, feeling that the enhanced social, economic, and sexual choices that feminism provided for women would result in women choosing partners who were more eugenically sound. In his view, intelligent women would not choose, nor be forced to marry and procreate with feeble-minded men.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 303: "Joskus ihmiset tekevät jotain perverssiä, vaikka se vain todistaisi olevansa vapaa", Christofi sanoo. Esim Michael Jackson hississä painamassa nappulaa.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 341: What was this book even about??? The "narrator" kept jumping around with what he was talking about, quite a few times I had no idea who was speaking, and what was the point of all the billionaires? They had absolutely nothing to do with the story! It took 104 pages of confusing and pointless narrative for the guy to tell the girl (after 40 years of knowing her, no less) that he wanted to be with her. This might have been one of the most anti-climactic love stories I have ever read. The secondary characters seemed completely irrelevant to the plotline and it appeared that their only function was to take up printable space. The story was unimaginative, lacking in depth, and devoid of anything memorable. The only reason I bothered to finish it was to get one step closer to finishing my goodreads reading challenge, else I would have ditched it at page 20.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 345: Ok, I tried. This novella is only about 100 pages long, but I got 10 pages in and I'm just not in any way interested. He's not Chinese, but he sort of looks like he's Chinese, so he goes to China for five years, but returns to Chicago to be near a woman he hasn't seen in 15 years because he's never been able to stop thinking about her, but then he's told he looks like he's Japanese, and gosh that's true! so he cuts his hair to look more Japanese, and he goes to a dinner party with rich people, then runs into the woman he's been pining over for 15 years and doesn't recognize her, and I just couldn't go any further. Another one off my shelf!
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 349: Checked out a few Saul Bellow books and discovered I have not changed as I have aged. I just don't enjoy his writing, Nobel Prize winner or not. I can still hear his squeaky Donald Duck voice in my head from many interviews he gave here in Chicago and did see him years ago in debates at The Newberry Library Book Fair.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 355: In Murder in the cool Cadethral, Thomas Stearns Eliot has his namesake and mouthpiece Thomas Beckett says:
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 359: Eliot may often have been deeply unkind – he had vile views on many topics – but he was never stupid, especially about the moral and rational life. Yet in this, as in so much else in the work I shall be considering in this series, he was speaking a brilliant half-truth.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 361: Eliot – arguably the greatest poetry in English in the 20th century – was so worried that he might be pursuing religious and literary sainthood for his own ego rather than to the greater glory of god, that he forgot ever to consider whether it was even possible or desirable to pursue sainthood at the expense of ordinary kindness and common decency. Throughout his life – and it was a long one, full of great work – he left a trail of human wreckage and hurtful speech. Any account of that work and of the ideas embedded in it has to keep track of the harm he did, not in a spirit of cheap point-scoring, but as an awful warning. Those of us who try to pursue both an ethical life and a creative one find that it is never easy, that it is always needful that we weigh one good against another.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 363: We should never think selfless virtue can be reached by treading on others. The cold splinter at the heart of the true artist must be harsher in its quarrel with the self than it is in its rhetorical engagement with other people. For believers, this is the virtue of humility; I am not sure what the rest of us can call it. What we can agree on is the constant examination of conscience, and, when we fall short, a conscious decision to do better.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 365: Eliot was in love three times (not counting the catamites), and each of those loves became events in his artistic and spiritual lives – and two of the women involved were massively the worse for it. Vivien Eliot was a difficult woman, yet Eliot – who had connived at her affair with Bertrand Russell – treated her, with the agreement of his spiritual advisers, with a coldness that helped break her spirit, perhaps her mind. Emily Hale was the woman he deserted for Vivien; she spent her life at his encouragement waiting for Vivien to die, and it was in her presence that he had some of his deepest moments of spiritual intensity – yet she was eventually dismissed from his life with equal coldness. They were both central to his greatest works: Vivien to The Waste Land and Emily to much of The Four Quartets.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 367: Two of his closest friends, Mary Trevelyan and John Hayward, were also in due course sent into outer darkness. We are told to forgive our enemies; Eliot could not even forgive those who loved him. In all those cases, Eliot was aware of the harm done, and may even have taken responsibility for it in his heart; what he never did was question the human cost to others of the life he pursued in his quest for genius and sainthood. He would not face the possibility that any God who asked such things of him was not worth his worship.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 369: It is clear that Eliot would have preferred to live in a society in which it was not even possible to ask awkward spiritual questions. He grew up under an austere Unitarianism and moved to a high Anglicanism – not because he disliked the doctrinal certainties of the Catholic church, but because Anglicanism meant he could amalgamate religious certainty with a high Tory monarchism that regarded even the rise of the Tudors as a dilution of the divine right of kings. (He mourned Richard III each year with a white rose in his lapel). His antisemitism was expressed in visceral terms but at root it was free-thinking he thought should have little place in a good society as much as the Jews he identified it with.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 371: As Anthony Julius has demonstrated beyond a shadow of doubt, Eliot used language about Jews that was closely linked both to traditional antisemitic hate speech and to the tropes of the murderous antisemitism of his own time. It is hard to see how this can be reconciled to his Christianity, except because he saw diversity a
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 372: s a threat to his cloistered virtue. Or perhaps I am wrong. Eliot's racism towards African-Americans was expressed in the crudest and most simplistic of doggerel; the antisemitism creeps into, if not his greatest work, at least into work closely allied to it.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 374: And yet, amid the relationships in bad faith and the vile views, Eliot managed to say important and useful things about both the experience of modernity and the mental states which we may as well call "the spiritual life", even if we are sceptical about the existence of spirit. It is important that we read him, sometimes holding our nose, because with all his deep personal flaws – and all the more when we think about them – he remains one of the lock and key writers of his and our time.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 444: There important historical antecedents that may help us figure out the true reasons of the charming beauty of Ukranian women. Ukraine is a very special country which is located nearly in the centre of Europe. Therefore, it has always been the point of intersection between different cultures and nations. It has been largely affected by both, the West and the East. The trade routes that were used by the ancient and middle ages merchants ran through the territory of the modern-day Ukraine. Thus, nations such as the Nordic Vikings and Southern Greeks met each other en route to their destinations towns and ports. They made their way through Ukraine. Eastern tribes of the Pechenegs, Kipchaks and even Mongols have all contributed to the modern beauty of the Ukranian women. Afterwards, it was largely affected by Russia which also has very beautiful women. During the past century, lots of European nations managed to leave their scumbags in the Ukraine. So, this is the historical background which helps us realise that the current beauty of the Ukranian women is attributed to the mixture of very different nations from two different parts of the world.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 452: Vladimir Putin and his forces have learned a painful lesson from underestimating Ukranians and their will to fight. In a different sense, so has the United States.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 453: Ukraine is the only country in the world to stage two popular, revolutionary movements within the span of a decade ... in support of democracy, a Euro-Atlantic orientation, an end to corruption and an escape from being under the Russian thumb. There have been other demonstrations and revolutionary movements to be sure, but they are not this popular here with us, at least since the red, white, green, and black armies that ravaged the polje in the 20's.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 455: Fortunately, the administration has ramped up military assistance significantly, providing vital lethal anti-tank, anti-aircraft and anti-ship missiles and other weapons, including drones and long-range artillery, that have had a huge impact on levelling the battlefield to ground. Other countries have also provided much-needed assistance, including tank tops. This assistance has made a world of difference and sent an important morale boost to the Ukranian bride.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 495: Mannen som anklagas för att ha kissat på Linda Torellos grav valde att inte kommentera ärendet när New York Post kontaktade honom. Hmm. No comments at this time I guess.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 499: A man with an apparent 48-year grudge has been going each morning to urinate on the grave of his ex, much to the horror of her furious kids, who realized something was wrong when they discovered bags of poop left at their mom’s final resting place. “I felt like getting out and killing him,” said Michael Andrew Murphy, 43, told The Post of what it was like to catch the man he says has been desecrating the burial site of his mom, Linda Torello. Then my sis could have gone and peed, crapped and menstruated on his.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 504: When they checked the camera footage, they spotted the gross grave visitor: a man who was briefly married to Torello in the 1970s. The footage was too blurry and grainy to take to authorities, so a week ago, Murphy and his sister got up at 5 a.m. to drive to the cemetery and laid in wait. Murphy set up his smartphone on a nearby headstone to take better photos and hid behind a small shed.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 506: Murphy said the video and pictures he and his sister got indicated that the man drove to the cemetery almost every morning between 6:14 a.m. and 6:18 a.m. with his current wife, got out of the car, walked to Torello’s grave and peed on it. (How could one video possibly indicate as much as that?) “I can’t get my wife to go out to dinner but this guy gets his wife to go along with him to desecrate my mom’s remains every morning!” Murphy fumed.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 516: Best friends Fred and Barney awaken with hangovers and no memory of the previous night. Their television is on, showing a program about animals using rubble and flintstones as currency to get food. In the program is a monkey nicknamed Andrew. It's the best actor of the film. Pity it only has a cameo role. Their refrigerator is filled with containers of chocolate pudding, and the answering machine contains an angry message from their twin girlfriends Wilma and Betty as to their whereabouts. The two also learn they have almost been fired from their jobs at the quarry. They emerge from their home to find Fred's car missing, and with it their baby girlfriends' first-anniversary presents. This prompts Fred to ask the film's titular question: "Dude, where's my car?"
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 520: Because the girls have promised them a "special treat", which Fred and Barney take to mean sexual intercourse, the men are desperate to retrieve their car. The duo begins retracing their steps in an attempt to discover where they left the car. Along the way, they encounter a transgender stripper, a belligerent speaker box operator at a Chinese restaurant's drive-through, two tattoos they discover on each other's backs, UFO cultists led by Zoltan (who later hold the twins hostage), a Cantonese-speaking Chinese tailor, the Zen-minded Nelson and his cannabis-loving dog Jackal, beautiful Christie Boner, her aggressive jock boyfriend Tommy and his friends, a couple of hard-nosed police detectives, and a reclusive French ostrich named Pierre. They also meet two groups of aliens, one group being five gorgeous women, the other being two Norwegian men, searching for the "Continuum Transfunctioner": an extraterrestrial device that the boys accidentally picked up last night.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 524: After Pierre releases the duo for correctly answering a question about ostriches, Fred and Barney head over to a local arcade named Captain Stu's Space-O-Rama. Once inside, they encounter Zoltan and his cultists who give them Wilma and Betty in exchange for a toy that Fred and Barney later on (see below) try to pass off as the Transfunctioner. Tommy, Christie, and the jocks arrive along with Nelson and his dog, whom they release after Tommy snatches the fake Transfunctioner from Zoltan. The two sets of aliens arrive and notify everyone of the real Continuum Transfunctioner: a Rubik's Cube that Barney has been working hard to solve. He then solves it on the spot, causing the device to shapeshift into its true form. The boys are warned that once the five girls stop flashing, the universe will be destroyed.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 542: Say, is this supposed to be funny or something?
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 609: Ingmar Guandique, an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador, was convicted of Levy’s murder in 2010 and sentenced to 60 years in prison, but his conviction was later overturned and a retrial ordered earlier last year. The U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia dismissed all charges against Guandique in July after the office concluded that "it can no longer prove the murder case against Mr. Guandique beyond a reasonable doubt."
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 611: Condit, who has written a book on his experience, is now living in Arizona and working various odd jobs, including at one point owning Baskin-Robbins franchises.
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 612: "I saw her one time outside the office, at a restaurant, and she came by my condo once," Condit said of Levy, who was from his congressional district. "Maybe twice. Yeah, I think it was twice she came by."
    xxx/ellauri224.html on line 617: Despite his denials, Gary’s ties to Chandra’s case ultimately caused his political career to crumble. In 2002, he lost his house seat — just mere weeks after Chandra’s remains were discovered in Washington, D.C.’s Rock Creek Park. Gary then moved to Arizona, where he opened several Baskin-Robbins stores. However, his venture in the ice cream business was cut short in 2012, when his franchises reportedly closed.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 44: The general gist is that humans originally spread throughout the galaxy from a planet called Hain. The Hainish colonies (including Earth) all eventually lost contact with and then memory of each other; each book or story then shows a planet at or shortly after the moment when contact is re-established. It’s a useful way to frame the classic sociological sci-fi writing that Le Guin is known for—an Envoy or Observer from the slowly burgeoning coalition of planets can arrive at a completely new human society, which Le Guin can then use to dissect and explore some facet of real life through speculative worldbuilding. And the best part of it is that unless Darwin got his hairy foot into it, all the Hainians got fully interlocking genitals! One of the biggest obstacles to enjoyable alien sex is overcome.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 46: That said, The Telling feels a little different compared to the rest of the Hainish Cycle. And for good reason—released in 2000, The Telling is the first full Hainish novel Le Guin wrote since The Dispossessed in 1974. It reads softer, more intimate than the books that came before, feeling almost more like fantasy than science fiction at times. The Telling follows Sutty Dass, an Observer who arrives on the planet Aka to record its history and culture while Hain makes its diplomatic overtures. During the time dilation of Sutty’s near-light space travel, however, Aka experienced an intense social upheaval that saw a tyrannical capitalist hegemony take power over the planet and attempt to wipe out the entirety of Aka’s long history. It then falls to Sutty, who grew up under religious oppression on Earth, to uncover and understand Aka’s historical and spiritual traditions as they are actively being eradicated by the corporation-state.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 101: Pitää siinä olla jokunen superherokin, jota voidaan jäljitellä kuin Kim Kardashiania. Entäs sitten pyhistystä, pitääkö olla jotain loistavaa, jotain puhasta ja tabua? Jotain jolle pyllistellä nöyränä? Kaippa niin, siihenkin on kova tarve monilla. Täähän se pointti on: uskonto on tarve siinä missä kusi- ja paskahätä, nälkä ja jano ja pakko päästä pukille.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 118: 2n myötävaikutuxesta syntyivät 3haarat, kuin myös halkiohaarat. 4 toimintoa ja 5 elemenziä. Pussaus, nuohous, runkkaus, nuolenta? Lili, paapa, sylki, runkku, mikä viidentenä? Menskut vai korvavaha? Smegma ehkä? Räkä? Tässähän niitä on jo 7! Eikä siinä kaikki! Hiki, jalkasilsa, silmärähmä sekä kyyneleet! Vanha viidakko, kauhistuttava mutta rehevä. Dharma-koira vinkuu reiän reunalla. Ei sinne Dharma! Hyi!
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 145: I learned that making power from the Sun is not easy. I began to see how nature beat this problem. Collecting sunlight is key to the survival of a tree. Leaves are the solar panels of trees, collecting sunlight for photosynthesis. Collecting the most sunlight is the difference between life and death. Trees in a forest are competing with other trees and plants for sunlight, and even each branch and leaf on a tree are competing with each other for sunlight. Evolution chose the Fibonacci pattern to help trees track the Sun moving in the sky and to collect the most sunlight even in the thickest forest.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 149: My conclusions suggest that the Fibonacci pattern in trees makes an evolutionary difference. This is probably why the Fibonacci pattern is found in deciduous trees living in higher latitudes. The Fibonacci pattern gives plants like the oak tree a competitive edge over solar panels while collecting sunlight when the Sun moves through the sky.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 179: "Minusta historia ja Suuri Tarina ovat sama asia", Kilroy sanoi lopulta. "Ne ovat tapoja pitää ja säilyttää pyhät asiat." "Mitä on pyhyys?" "Se mikä on totta on pyhää. Se minkä edestä on kärsitty. Se mikä on kaunista." (Vittu koita päättää! Nuo ovat 3 eri asiaa!!!) "Joten Suuri Tarina yrittää siis löytää totuuden tapahtumista... tai tuskan tai kauneuden?" "Ei ole mitään tarvetta yrittää löytää sitä", Unroy sanoi. "Pyhyys on totuudessa, tuskassa ja kauneudessa. Siksi niistä kertominen on pyhää." What bullshit.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 200: No mutta mitä helvettiä? Nythän tää avainromaani eeku selkenee! Kiltit ekumeenit eli länkkärit lähettivät ennen sotia kilttejä lähettejä Kiinaan tekemään kristillistä käännytystyötä, mut sit tulivat pahat unistit eli ryssät pilaamaan koko sopan ja usuttivat kiinalaiset pitkälle marssille kohti punaista tähteä. Kunnes sittemmin Jelzin Dalzulina käänsi nudnistiryssän kelkan ja historia lakkasi kuten Fukuyama ennusti, kauppa alkoi käydä globaalisti ja kaikista tuli kapitalisteja. Mitä nyt mumslimifundamentalistit pörräsivät terroristeina ja tapattivat epähuomiossa jenkkipörriäisellä Smuttyn panopuun Paon. Okei! Smutty on siis vapaalla jalalla!
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 232: He was twice a New York Times bestselling author, first with his book on his personal philosophy of positive force and the psychology of self-improvement based on personal anecdotes called The Secret of Inner Strength: My Story (1988). His second New York Times Best Seller, Black Belt Patriotism: How to Reawaken America (2008), was about his critique on current issues in the USA. Norris also appeared in several commercials endorsing several products most notably being one of the main spokespersons for the Total Gym infomercials. In 2005, Norris found new fame on the Internet when Chuck Norris facts became an Internet meme documenting humorous, fictional and often absurd feats of strength and endurance. To list just a few of them:
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 234: He did not meet his illegitimate daughter from a past relationship until she was 26, although she learned that he was her father when she was 16. Norris has thirteen grandchildren as of 2017. An outspoken Christian, Norris is the author of several Christian-themed books. On April 22, 2008, Norris expressed his support for the intelligent design movement when he reviewed Ben Stein´s Expelled From Townhall.com.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 251: Kroeber married Henriette Rothschild in 1906. She contracted tuberculosis and died in 1913, after several years of illness. In 1926 he married again, to Theodora Kracaw Brown, a widow whom he met as a student in one of his graduate seminars. They had two children: Karl Kroeber, a literary critic, and the science fiction writer Ursula Kroeber Le Guin. In addition, Alfred adopted Theodora's sons by her first marriage, Ted and Clifton Brown, who both took his surname.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 255: In 1953 (aged 24) while traveling to France aboard the Queen Mary, Ursula met historian Charles Le Guin.They married in Paris in December 1953. According to Le Guin, the marriage signaled the "end of the doctorate" for her. While her husband finished his doctorate at Emory University in Georgia, and later at the University of Idaho, Le Guin taught French and worked as a secretary until the birth of her daughter Elisabeth in 1957. A second daughter, Caroline, was born in 1959. Also in that year, Charles became an instructor in history at Portland State University, and the couple moved to Portland, Oregon, where their son Theodore was born in 1964. They would live in Portland for the rest of their lives, although Le Guin received further Fulbright grants to travel to London in 1968 and 1975.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 259: Le Guin once said she was "raised as irreligious as a jackrabbit". She expressed a deep interest in Taoism and Buddhism, saying that Taoism gave her a "handle on how to look at life" during her adolescent years. In 1997, she published a translation of the Tao Te Ching.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 269: Dad´s discipline of cultural anthropology had a powerful influence on Le Guin´s writing. Her father Alfred Kroeber is considered a pioneer in the field, and was a director of the University of California Museum of Anthropology: as a consequence of his research, Le Guin was exposed to anthropology and cultural exploration as a child. In addition to myths and legends, she read such volumes as The Leaves of the Golden Bough by Lady Frazer, a children´s book adapted from The Golden Bough, a study of myth and religion by her husband James George Frazer. She described living with her father´s friends and acquaintances as giving her the experience of the other sex. The experiences of Ishi, in particular, were influential on Le Guin, and elements of his story have been identified in works such as Planet of Exile, City of Illusions, and The Word for World Is Forest and The Dispossessed.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 271: Several scholars have commented that Le Guin´s writing was influenced by Carl Jung, and specifically by the idea of Jungian archetypes. In particular, the shadow in A Wizard of Earthsea is seen as the Shadow archetype from Jungian psychology, representing Ged´s pride, fear, and desire for power. Le Guin discussed her interpretation of this archetype, and her interest in the dark and repressed parts of the psyche, in a 1974 lecture. She stated elsewhere that she had never read Jung before writing the first Earthsea books. Other archetypes, including the Mother, Animus, and Anima, have also been identified in Le Guin´s writing.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 273: Philosophical Taoism had a large role in Le Guin´s world view, and the influence of Taoist thought can be seen in many of her stories. Many of Le Guin´s protagonists, including in The Lathe of Heaven, embody the Taoist ideal of leaving things alone. The anthropologists of the Hainish universe try not to meddle with the cultures they encounter, while one of the earliest lessons Ged learns in A Wizard of Earthsea is not to use magic unless it is absolutely necessary. Taoist influence is evident in Le Guin´s depiction of equilibrium in the world of Earthsea: the archipelago is depicted as being based on a delicate balance, which is disrupted by somebody in each of the first three novels. This includes an equilibrium between land and sea, implicit in the name "Earthsea", between people and their natural environment, and a larger cosmic equilibrium, which wizards are tasked with maintaining. Another prominent Taoist idea is the reconciliation of opposites such as light and dark, or good and evil. A number of Hainish novels, The Dispossessed prominent among them, explored such a process of reconciliation. In the Earthsea universe, it is not the dark powers, but the characters´ misunderstanding of the balance of life, that is depicted as evil, in contrast to conventional Western stories in which good and evil are in constant conflict, wearing white and black stezons, respectively. The idea of leaving good enough alone, in particular, is deeply un-American.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 275: Although Le Guin is primarily known for her works of speculative fiction, she also wrote realistic fiction, non-fiction, poetry, and several other literary forms, which makes her work quite difficult for librarians to classify. Her writings received critical attention from mainstream critics, critics of children´s literature, and critics of speculative fiction. Le Guin herself said that she would prefer to be known as an "American novelist". Le Guin´s transgression of conventional boundaries of genre led to literary criticism of Le Guin becoming "Balkanized", particularly between scholars of children´s literature and speculative fiction. Commentators have noted that the Earthsea novels specifically received less critical attention because they were considered children´s books. Le Guin herself took exception to this treatment of children´s literature, describing it as "adult chauvinist piggery". In 1976, literature scholar George Slusser criticized the "silly publication classification designating the original series as 'children's literature'", while in Barbara Bucknall´s opinion Le Guin "can be read, like Tolkien, by ten-year-olds and by adults. These stories are ageless because they deal with problems that beset us at any age."
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 277: Several of Le Guin´s works have featured stylistic or structural features that were unusual or even subversive. The heterogeneous structure of The Left Hand of Darkness, described as "distinctly post-modern" (eek!), was unusual for the time of its publication. This was in marked contrast to the structure of (primarily male-authored) traditional science fiction, which was straightforward and linear. The novel was framed as part of a report sent to the Ekumen by the protagonist Genly Ai after his time on the planet Gethen, thus suggesting that Ai was selecting and ordering the material, consisting of personal narration, diary extracts, Gethenian myths, and ethnological reports. Earthsea also employed an outlandishly unconventional narrative form described by scholar Mike Cadden (Princeton U Senior Lecturer in Theater) as "free indirect discourse", in which the feelings of the protagonist are not directly separated from the narration, making the narrator seem sympathetic to the characters, and removing the skepticism towards a character´s thoughts and emotions that are a feature of more direct narration. Cadden suggests that this method leads to younger readers sympathizing directly with the characters, making it an effective technique for young-adult literature like Flaubert or Zola.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 281: A number of Le Guin´s writings, including the Earthsea series, challenged the conventions of epic fantasies and myths. Many of the protagonists in Earthsea were dark-skinned individuals, in comparison to the white-skinned heroes more traditionally used; some of the antagonists, in contrast, were white-skinned, a switching of race roles that has been critically remarked upon by multiple critics. In a 2001 interview, Le Guin attributed the frequent lack of character illustrations on her book covers to her choice of non-white protagonists. LOL haha! She explained this choice, saying: "most people in the world aren't white. Why in the future would we assume they are?" Her 1985 book Always Coming Home, described as "her great experiment", included a story told from the perspective of a young protagonist, but also included poems, rough drawings of plants and animals, myths, and anthropological reports from the matriarchal society of the Kesh, a fictional people living in the Napa valley after a catastrophic global flood.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 286: Gethen was portrayed as a society without war, as a result of this absence of fixed gender characteristics, and also without sexuality as a continuous factor in social relationships. Gethenian culture was explored in the novel through the eyes of a Terran, whose masculinity proves a barrier to cross-cultural communication. Outside the Hainish Cycle, Le Guin´s use of a female protagonist in The Tombs of Atuan, published in 1971, was described as a "significant exploration of womanhood".
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 292: Le Guin initially defended her writing; in a 1976 essay "Is Gender Necessary?" she wrote that gender was secondary to the novel´s primary theme of loyalty. Le Guin revisited this essay in 1988, and acknowledged that gender was central to the novel; she also apologized for depicting Gethenians solely in heterosexual relationships. In fact they did a lot of trainwatching and pussymunching too, she just did not tell.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 294: Le Guin responded to these critiques in her subsequent writing. She intentionally used feminine pronouns for all sexually latent Gethenians in her 1995 short story "Coming of Age in Karhide", and in a later reprinting of "Winter's King", which was first published in 1969. "Coming of Age in Karhide" was later anthologized in the 2002 collection The Birthday of the World, which contained six other stories featuring unorthodox sexual relationships and marital arrangements. She also revisited gender relations in Earthsea in Tehanu, published in 1990. This volume was described as a rewriting or reimagining of The Tombs of Atuan, because the power and status of the female protagonist Tenar are the inverse of what they were in the earlier book, which was also focused on her and Ged. During this later period she commented that she considered The Eye of the Heron, published in 1978, to be her first work genuinely centered on a woman.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 296: Le Guin explores coming of age, and moral development more broadly, in many of her writings. This is particularly the case in those works written for a younger audience, such as Earthsea and Annals of the Western Shore. Le Guin wrote in a 1973 essay that she chose to explore coming-of-age in Earthsea since she was writing for an adolescent audience: "Coming of age ... is a process that took me many years; I finished it, so far as I ever will, at about age thirty-one; like Ellis Havelock I provably only lost my hymen when I was 27, so I feel rather deeply about it. So do most adolescents. It´s their main occupation, in fact." She also said that fantasy was best suited as a medium for describing coming of age, because exploring the subconscious was difficult using the language of "rational daily life".
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 300: Each volume of Anals of the Western Shore also describes the coming of age of its protagonists, and features explorations of being enslaved to one´s own power. The process of growing up is depicted as seeing beyond narrow choices the protagonists are presented with by society. In Gifts, Orrec and Gry realize that the powers their people possess can be used in two ways: for control and dominion, or for healing and nurturing. Which will it be? This recognition allows them to take a third choice, viz. make like a tree and leave. This wrestling with choice has been compared to the choices the characters are forced to make in Le Guin´s short story "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas". Similarly, Ged helps Tenar in The Tombs of Atuan to value herself and to find choices that she did not see, leading her to leave the Tombs with him. But remember, Le Guin never left Portland where her wimpy husband could barely hold a teaching job.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 302: Alternative social and political systems are a recurring theme in Le Guin´s writing. Critics have paid particular attention to The Dispossessed and Always Coming Home, although Le Guin explores related themes in a number of her works, such as in "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas". The Dispossessed is an anarchist utopian novel, which according to Le Guin drew from pacifist anarchists, including Peter Kropotkin, as well as from the counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s. Le Guin has been credited with "[rescuing] anarchism from the cultural ghetto to which it has been consigned", and helping to bring it into the intellectual (capitalist) mainstream. Fellow author Kathleen Ann Goonan wrote that Le Guin´s work confronted the "paradigm of insularity toward the suffering of people, other living beings, and resources", and explored "life-respecting sustainable alternatives".
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 304: The Dispossessed, set on the twin planets of Urras and Anarres, features a planned anarchist society depicted as an "ambiguous utopia". The society, created by settlers from Urras, is materially poorer than the wealthy society of Urras, but ethically and morally more advanced. Unlike classical utopias, the society of Anarres is portrayed as neither perfect nor static; the protagonist Shevek finds himself traveling to Urras to pursue his research. Nonetheless, the misogyny and hierarchy present in the authoritarian society of Urras is absent among the anarchists, who base their social structure on cooperation and individual liberty. The Eye of the Heron, published a few years after The Dispossessed, was described as continuing Le Guin´s exploration of human freedom, through a conflict between two societies of opposing philosophies: a town inhabited by descendants of pacifists, and a city inhabited by descendants of criminals.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 308: Warren Rochelle lives and writes in Charlottesville, VA. He retired from the University of Mary Washington in 2020, after 20 years of teaching English. He earned a BA in English from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1977, followed by an MS in library science at Columbia University in 1978. After eleven years as a school librarian, he returned to school to earn his MFA in 1991, followed by his PhD in 1997, both from UNC Greensboro.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 317: Mary Anne Mohanraj said this:
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 325: Of course, Le Guin was writing daring stories decades before me, stories of women who loved women, of four-person marriages, of people without gender. Her stories offered possibilities that most of society hadn’t even imagined in the late 1960s; I knew she must have faced similar societal disapproval. So I wanted to know why she faded to black for her sex scenes. “There Arrad took me into his arms and I took Arrad into my arms, and then between my legs, and fell upward, upward through the golden light.” (“Coming of Age in Karhide”) There was plenty of sex in her books – sometimes tremendously important sex — but Le Guin didn’t dwell on the details. In fact her sex scenes were prudish and infinitely boring.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 329: I told my literature students about Ursula K. Le Guin today, squeezing a few minutes for her into a class on American science fiction writers of color, a class where she didn’t strictly speaking belong – though to be honest, I rather think she’d improve almost any class. I told them about the six books that comprise Earthsea, about the gender-bending brilliance of The Left Hand of Darkness, the anarchist explorations in The Dispossessed, the stories in The Birthday of the World and Four Ways to Forgiveness (many of which I teach, gratefully). I mentioned her National Book Award, and her host of awards in science fiction and fantasy. I gave them her story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” which is one of the most brilliant, uncomfortable stories I’ve ever read. But no blow-by-blow romps in the sack, alas.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 343: Writing about the provocative literary critic Harold Bloom is an intimidating affair. Everything about Bloom is daunting, particularly his noxious public persona. He will occasionally try to conceal it by condescendingly addressing his interviewer as “dear.” He rarely seems to notice whom he is speaking with, or what they are feeling. He can erupt into long passages of Shakespeare, Whitman or Yeats from memory—a circus act of stunning recall as he approaches 90. But unlike critics such as the late Lionel Trilling or Daniel Mendelsohn, for whom literary criticism is a tool to examine the crucial moral, social, and political questions of our time, Bloom insists that literature be studied purely for aesthetics.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 345: Still reading this free of charge? Buy the book!
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 347: In the 1960s, the New Criticism, which since has taken hold at most American universities, came into vogue, insisting that literature be reexamined through multiple lenses so that new interpretations and voices would flourish. Elaborate curriculums looked at literature through different prisms: gay, feminist, Marxist, deconstructionist and others. Bloom was enraged. He spent decades lambasting the New Criticism, refusing to have anything to do with these critics and labeling them derisively as “the school of resentment.” Many resented his elitism.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 349: Bloom was born in 1930 to a poor Orthodox Jewish household in the East Bronx, one of five children. He lost faith early in the Jewish God when he accidentally stumbled on the poetry of Hart Crane. He fell in love with Crane’s enthusiasm for life, his belief in the possibility of ecstatic pleasure, and his overall exuberance. This was in stark contrast to Bloom’s childhood, which he confesses was a lonely time.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 353: In his newest book, “Possessed by Memory: The Inward Light of Criticism,” Bloom promised to shake off the polemical battles that have shadowed him for years. He pledged to include never-revealed autobiographical snippets. He wanted to share with his readers his recent reevaluations of some of his most beloved writers. He only partially delivers.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 357: There are stunning passages from literature that have moved him for decades. There is poetry, prose, and criticism from John Milton, Dr. Samuel Johnson, Phil Collins, Thomas Gray, Blake, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, Keats, Tennyson, Browning, Swinburn, Elizabeth Bishop, John Ashbery and James Merrill Hintikka. Bloom meditates on the Hebrew prophets, the Kabbalah, Psalms, Job, the Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes. And of course, his beloved Shakespeare.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 359: But Bloom’s insights don’t resonate deeply. He is too obsessed with comparing and contrasting, rather than allowing his responses to touch us deeply. He repeats his theory that poets always wrestle with the work of the poets that have come before them, either unconsciously or consciously, and then struggle to find their own voice in reaction to what has come before. There is something anti-transformative about his assertions, often tangled up with incomprehensible jargon.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 362: Bloom still teaches (well, used to, he was carried out of the classroom in a huge black bodybag in 2019) at Yale and claims he has finally learned to better listen to his students. He tells them to select a piece of writing they love, sit under a tree and chant the lines to truly “possess” it. He does this himself at night when sleep fails him. The practice sparks repressed memories: “Vividly I saw myself, a boy of three, playing on the kitchen floor, alone with [my mother] as she prepared the Sabbath meal. She was born in a Jewish village, and I was happiest when we were alone together. As she passed me in her preparations I would reach out and touch her bare toes, and she would rumple my hair and murmur her affection for me.” Tädin pienet ruskeat amputoidut varpaat ihastuttivat myös Ursulaa hänen kirjassaan Kahdesti haarautuva puu (Don´t tell mama, kz. Fig. 2).
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 369: But then Bloom stops. He moves away from memory as though it might devour him. Bloom has confessed that during a serious midlife crisis, he underwent Freudian therapy for a year and a half and found it to be a dismal failure. The analyst thought Bloom was using their sessions as a performance venue. Although Bloom writes sneeringly while recounting this, it is one of the more startling revelations we learn about him. Selvä pyy, kaveri on (oli) narsisti.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 372: About Shakespeare, however, Bloom is nothing short of reverential: “My religion is the appreciation of high literature. Shakespeare is the summit. Revelation for me is Shakespearean or nothing.” He admits that much about the Bard still bewilders him. In a moment of rare vulnerability, Bloom admits he longs for more life. Bloom explains his theory of “self-otherseeing,” which allows one to glimpse parts of one’s self that are hidden from conscious view. “Self-otherseeing” also describes “the double-consciousness of observing our own actions and offerings as though they belong to others and not to ourselves.” Bloom insists that Shakespeare’s characterizations of Hamlet, Iago, Cleopatra and Falstaff use “self-othering,” and by watching them we inadvertently learn to think more seriously about ourselves. But he doesn’t show us how this has applied to him, only the declaration that it does so. We are left mystified and dubious.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 374: Recently, chanting Walt Whitman to himself at night—he describes Whitman as “our repressed voice,” a loosener and liberator whose fearlessness embraces every living moment—Bloom brought forth an almost feverish recollection from over 70 years ago. There was a young lady of 17 with lustrous long red hair. They were students at Cornell and took long walks together, picking apples that she would transform into a delicious applejack. And then, as with his mother, Bloom stops. We learn nothing else about the girl, what transpired, did he score, or what this memory meant to him on this restless night. He has already moved on, to his infatuation with Proust’s “privileged moments” and “sudden ecstasies of revelation,” which bring back to Bloom his dead parents whom he misses dearly.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 378: Ultimately Bloom cannot change into anything other than who he has always been—masterful and monstrous. He seems to sense he has moved out of favor in many circles but chooses not to dwell upon why. Instead, he continues as he always has: writing and teaching his handpicked “elite” students at Yale—part of the unique arrangement he has made with the university. He has led a long, cloistered, and entitled life. The aloneness he described as a child seems to have shrouded his adult life as well. I wonder if he questions this aloneness in his darkest moments. I would guess that he does not dwell too deeply upon it, perhaps afraid of answers he doesn’t wish to confront.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 380: I also wonder whether Bloom would relinquish his status as an intellectual of the highest order to feel for one day the exuberance and passion of Hart Crane. Stick his doubly branching tree into some applejack and squirt it out. What would he be willing to let go of to actually feel intimately the joy and euphoria that so seduces him in his imagination? Asks Elaine Margolin / TruthDig Contributor.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 384: Provoked and inspired by T. S. Eliot, Crane wrote modernist poetry that was difficult, highly stylized, and ambitious in its scope. In his most ambitious work, The Bridge, Crane sought to write an epic poem, in the vein of The Waste Land, that expressed a more optimistic view of modern, urban culture than the one that he found in Eliot´s work. But he FAILED! In the years following his suicide at the age of 32, Crane has been hailed by playwrights, poets, and literary critics alike (including Robert Lowell, Derek Walcott, Tennessee Williams, and Harold Bloom), as being one of the most influential poets of his generation.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 388: Crane´s mother and father were constantly fighting, and they divorced early in April 1917. Crane dropped out of East High School in Cleveland during his junior year and left for New York City, promising his parents he would attend Columbia University later. His parents, in the middle of their divorce proceedings, were upset. Crane took various copywriting jobs and moved between friends´ apartments in Manhattan. Between 1917 and 1924 he moved back and forth between New York and Cleveland, working as an advertising copywriter and a worker in his father´s factory. From Crane´s letters, it appears that New York was where he felt most at home, and much of his poetry is set there.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 390: Throughout the early 1920s, small but well-respected literary magazines published some of Crane's poems, gaining him among the avant-garde a respect that White Buildings (1926), his first volume, ratified and strengthened. White Buildings contains many of Crane's best poems, including "For the Marriage of Faustus and Helen", and "Voyages", a sequence of erotic poems. They were written while he was falling in love with Emil Opffer, a Danish merchant mariner. What ho, he was a homophile, like his heroes Wilt Whatman and T.S. Eliot.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 394: Crane returned to New York in 1928, living with friends and taking temporary jobs as a copywriter, or living off unemployment and the charity of friends and his father. For a time he lived in Brooklyn at 77 Willow Street until his lover, Opffer, invited him to live in Opffer´s father´s home at 110 Columbia Heights in Brooklyn Heights. Crane was overjoyed at the views the location afforded him. He wrote his mother and grandmother in the spring of 1924:
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 396: Just imagine looking out your window directly on the East River with nothing intervening between your view of the Statue of Liberty, way down the harbour, and the marvelous beauty of Brooklyn Bridge close above you on your right! All of the great new skyscrapers of lower Manhattan are marshaled directly across from you, and there is a constant stream of tugs, liners, sail boats, etc in procession before you on the river! It´s really a magnificent place to live. This section of Brooklyn is very old, but all the houses are in splendid condition and have not been invaded by foreigners.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 398: Oh-oh! Hart was a xenophile. No wonder his planned synthesis didn´t work. Can´t make an American synthesis without immigrants poking their pale faces in. With just Ishi and his chums it won´t be the same.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 402: Crane found a place to start his synthesis in Brooklyn. Arts patron Otto H. Kahn gave him $2,000 to begin work on the epic poem. When he wore out his welcome at the Opffers´, Crane left for Paris in early 1929, but failed to leave his personal problems behind. His drinking, always a problem, became notably worse during the late 1920s, while he was finishing The Bridge. Loppuajat se vietti pääasiassa sillan alla.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 404: In Paris in February 1929, Harry Crosby, who with his wife Caresse Crosby owned the fine arts press Black Sun Press, offered Crane the use of their country retreat, Le Moulin du Soleil in Ermenonville. They hoped he could use the time to concentrate on completing The Bridge. Crane spent several weeks at their estate where he roughed out a draft of the "Cape Hatteras" section, a key part of his epic poem. In late June that year, Crane returned from the south of France to Paris. Crosby noted in his journal, "Hart C. back from Marseilles where he slept with his thirty sailors and he began again to drink Cutty Sark." Crane got drunk at the Cafe Select and fought with waiters over his tab. When the Paris police were called, he fought with them and was beaten. They arrested and jailed him, fining him 800 francs. After Hart had spent six days in prison at La Santé, Crosby paid Crane´s fine and advanced him money for the passage back to the United States, where he finally finished The Bridge. The work received poor reviews, and Crane´s sense of failure became crushing. He had completely and irrevocably FAILED!
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 406: Crane visited Mexico in 1931–32 on a Guggenheim Fellowship (Sillä oli Guggenheim, kuten sillä etovalla perhostennappaajalla Yellowstonessa. Inkkarit luulivat sitä varmaan joxikin sukupuolitaudixi), and his drinking continued as he suffered from bouts of alternating depression and elation. When Peggy Cowley, wife of his friend Malcolm Cowley, agreed to a divorce, she joined Crane. As far as is known, she was his only heterosexual partner. "The Broken Tower", one of his last published poems, emerged from that affair. Crane still felt himself a failure, in part because he recommenced his homosexual activities in spite of his relationship with Cowley.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 408: While en route to New York aboard the steamship Orizaba, he was beaten up after making sexual advances to a male crew member. Just before noon on April 27, 1932, Crane jumped overboard into the Gulf of Mexico. Although he had been drinking heavily and left no suicide note, witnesses believed his intentions to be suicidal, as several reported that he exclaimed "Goodbye, everybody!" before throwing himself overboard. His body was never recovered. A marker in the form of a lifesaver candy on his father´s tombstone at Park Cemetery outside Garrettsville, Portage County, Ohio includes the inscription, "Harold Hart Crane 1899–1932 lost completely at sea". Ai Hart olikin oikeasti Harold, niinkuin bändärinsä Bloom. Childe Haroldeja olisivat halunneet olla kumpikin. But they FAILED!
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 410: Crane´s critical effort, like those of Keats and Rilke, is mostly to be found in his letters: he corresponded regularly with Allen Tate, Yvor Winters, and Gorham Munson, and shared critical dialogues with Eugene O´Neill, William Carlos Williams, E. E. Cummings, Sherwood Anderson, Kenneth Burke, Waldo Frank, Harriet Monroe, Marianne Moore, and Gertrude Stein. He was also an acquaintance of H. P. Lovecraft, who eventually would voice concern over Crane´s premature aging due to alcohol abuse. Most serious work on Crane begins with his letters, selections of which are available in many editions of his poetry; his letters to Munson, Tate, Winters, and his patron, Otto Hermann Kahn, are particularly insightful. His two most famous stylistic defenses emerged from correspondences: his "General Aims and Theories" (1925) was written to urge Eugene O´Neill´s critical foreword to White Buildings, then passed around among friends, yet unpublished during Crane´s life; and the famous "Letter to Harriet Monroe" (1926) was part of an exchange for the publication of "At Melville´s Tomb" in Poetry. The literary critic Adam Kirsch has argued that "Crane has been a special case in the canon of American modernism, because his reputation was never quite as secure as that of Eliot or Stevens. In fact he FAILED."
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 414: Ja sitten oli tää homosexuaalisuus. As a boy, he had a sexual relationship with a man. He associated his sexuality with his vocation as a poet. Raised in the Christian Science tradition of his mother, he never ceased to view himself as a social pariah. However, as poems such as "Repose of Rivers" make clear, he felt that this sense of alienation was necessary in order for him to attain the visionary insight that formed the basis for his poetic work.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 416: Recent criticism has suggested reading Crane´s poems—"The Broken Tower", "My Grandmother´s Love Letters", the "Voyages" series, and others—with an eye to homosexual meanings in the text. Queer theorist Tim Dean argues, for instance, that the obscurity of Crane´s style owes partially to the necessities of being a semi-public homosexual—not quite closeted, but also, as legally and culturally necessary, not open: "The intensity responsible for Crane´s particular form of difficulty involves not only linguistic considerations but also culturally subjective concerns. This intensity produces a kind of privacy that is comprehensible in terms of the cultural construction of homosexuality and its attendant institutions of privacy."
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 418: Thomas Yingling objects to the traditional, New Critical and Eliotic readings of Crane, arguing that the "American myth criticism and formalist readings" have "depolarized and normalized our reading of American poetry, making any homosexual readings seem perverse." Thomas E. Yingling was associate professor of English at Syracuse University until his death from AIDS-related causes in 1992. Even more than a personal or political problem, though, Yingling argues that such "biases" obscure much of what the poems make clear; he cites, for instance, the last lines of "My Grandmother´s Love Letters" from White Buildings as a haunting description of estrangement from the norms of (heterosexual) family life:
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 425: Brian Reed has contributed to a project of critical reintegration of queer criticism with other critical methods, suggesting that an overemphasis on the sexual biography of Crane´s poetry can skew a broader appreciation of his overall work. In one example of Reed´s approach, he published a close reading of Crane´s lyric poem, "Voyages", (a love poem that Crane wrote for his lover Emil Opffer) on the Poetry Foundation website, analyzing the poem based strictly on the content of the text itself and not on outside political or cultural matters. We can faintly hear Harold Bloom clap his hands in the body bag.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 427: Crane was admired by artists including Allen Tate, Eugene O´Neill, Kenneth Burke, Edmund Wilson, E. E. Cummings and William Carlos Williams. Although Hart had his sharp critics, among them Marianne Moore and Ezra Pound, Moore did publish his work, as did T. S. Eliot, who, moving even further out of Pound´s sphere, may have borrowed some of Crane´s imagery for Four Quartets, in the beginning of East Coker, which is reminiscent of the final section of "The River", from The Bridge.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 429: Important mid-century American poets, such as John Berryman and Robert Lowell, cited Crane as a significant influence. Both poets also wrote about Crane in their poetry. Berryman wrote him one of his famous elegies in The Dream Songs, and Lowell published his "Words for Hart Crane" in Life Studies (1959): "Who asks for me, the Shelley of my age, / must lay his heart out for my bed and board." Lowell thought that Crane was the most important American poet of the generation to come of age in the 1920s, stating that "[Crane] got out more than anybody else ... he somehow got New York City (though an Ohio hick); he was at the center of things in the way that no other poet was." Lowell also described Crane as being "less limited than any other poet of his generation." Talk to the hand, they were both abysmal FAILURES!
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 480: Ehkä ryssät panostivat Itämeren kaasulinjan Nobelin dynamiittipötköillä jo rakennettaessa juuri tämmöisiä kriisitilanteita varten. Linja sopii räjäyttää näin talven tullen vastavetona länkkäreiden yltyvälle sotainnolle ja nälistyxelle. Saavatpahan tuta keski-Euroopassa miten vetää nenättien bajamajoissa. Ukrainan selkkaus yllätti lännen aseteollisuuden housut nilkoissa. Kohta ei riitä länkkäreillä pateja edes omaan tarpeeseen. Ja silloin uhkaa Kiina tehdä Plopovin izemurhasiirron USAn selän takana ja miehittää lopultakin valkoisen generalissimo Ziang Kai Shekin pakosaaren Formosan. Jännä miten tämäkin kaveri on tyystin häivytetty Wikipedian Taiwanin historiaosiosta. Siellä vaan hoetaan ettei kiinalaisia ole ollut Formosalla kuin 300 vuotta ja että se oli länkkäreillä ennen sitä. No eipä jenkit ole senkään aikaa pitäneet länsi-inkkareilta ryöväämäänsä brittisiirtomaata hallussaan. Wikipediaan ei ole luottamista kun jenkki-intressit on vaakalaudalla.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 650: Den lokala polisen hade därför varken kunnat, eller kanske ens velat, hindra de strejkande från att hissa upp tillresta ”arbetsvilliga” svartfötter ur ångaren Milos skrov (se bild ovan!) och visa upp dem på ett offentligt möte. Efter Ådalen insåg man att polismän från trakten framgent inte var lita på för att upphålla våldsmonopolet i landet, allra minst i det ”röda Ådalen”. Militär hade satts in vid liknande demonstrationer- bland annat vid drängarnas revolt i Klågerup 1811, i Stockholm 1848, Sundsvallsstrejken 1879 samt vid Seskarö-upproret och oroligheterna i Stockholm, båda 1917. Seskarössa on käyty kazomassa kyykytyxen muistomerkkejä. Aika matalaa profiilia pitävät svedut siitäkin. Myndigheten hade inte litat till värnpliktig militär för att skjuta på de strejkande, utan sände stamställda knektar från Sollefteå för att kväsa vad man betraktade som ett uppror.
    xxx/ellauri225.html on line 674: historic-uk.com/assets/Images/whoisjohnbull.jpg?1390900047" style="float:left;padding-right:1em" />
    xxx/ellauri227.html on line 58: Toivo ja Tyyne oli hispano suisnoja, jotka varmaan opiskeli epsanjaa molemmat päät yhdessä. Toivo väitteli, Tyyni jätti maisteriin, mutta Tyyni taisi olla silti maineikkaampi.
    xxx/ellauri227.html on line 89: Läckberg on ollut perustamassa Nobel-palkinnolle kilpailijaa, jonka jakaa Uusi akatemia, Den Nya Akademien, johon on liittynyt noin sata kulttuurialojen edustajaa. Ne eivät kyllä jaa yhtä paljon rahaa. Palkinto jaetaan 10. joulukuuta, kuten Nobelin kirjallisuuspalkintokin on jaettu. Varjopalkinnon nettiosoite https://dennyaakademien.com/ vie sivulle "Hello world": Welcome to Wordpress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing! With any luck you may be our next Shadow Nobel Prize winner!
    xxx/ellauri227.html on line 104: Micke Eriksson is a recurring character in Netflix series Young Royals. He is portrayed by Leonard Terfelt. To be added. To be added. To be added. Micke is first introduced when Simon goes to him to purchase booze for the initiation party, he appears friendly towards his son and invites him in to talk, even allowing him to buy the alcohol for the party. He seems to want to mend his ...
    xxx/ellauri227.html on line 143: Vuonna 2006 Camilla ja Micke kasvoivat erilleen. He kaipasivat elämältään jotain muuta. Wille ja Minttu eivät mitenkään riittäneet. Myöhemmin samana vuonna Camilla löysi uuden rakkauden, nim. Ingvar S. Melin, maailmanhistorian ensimmäinen Selviytyjät-voittaja ja poliisi. Ingvar on seurannut sivusta, miten Camilla taistelee deadlinea vastaan lasten repiessä häntä hihasta. Stieg Larsson-efektistä oli vasta alettu puhua. Potentiaalia oli loputtomiin, ja Camillalla kapassiteettia. Totuus on, että agentin ei tarvinnut puhua mitään kirjojen sisällöstä, riitti kun näytti kuvan Camillasta ja sanoi että kirjat ovat koukuttavia.
    xxx/ellauri227.html on line 344: Despite the titillating title, there's no sex to speak of in Marklund's second thriller featuring Swedish reporter Annika Bengtzon. The events in this book precede those in The Bomber, which introduced Annika as a successful newspaper editor. Here we see her eight years earlier, working as a summer intern at the same Stockholm paper. A young stripper's body is found in a city park, and as Annika and her colleagues investigate, they discover some strange links between the murder, high-ranking Swedish officials, and an illegal espionage operation long since disbanded. Meanwhile, Annika is struggling with a clingy boyfriend and learning the ins and outs of reporting in a competitive environment. These struggles are more compelling than the crimes she is investigating, and the action tends to move at a snail's pace until the rushed climax. However, fans of The Bomber will enjoy a second dose of spunky Annika and the realistic newsroom scenes. An author's note gives helpful background information on Swedish politics and the real-life inspiration for the story.
    xxx/ellauri227.html on line 353: Selma Lagerlöf är en av Sveriges mest kända författare. Hon är översatt och bearbetad över hela världen. I och med detta måste en viss “respekt” hållas. Att outa Lagerlöf som lesbisk skulle, enligt dagens normer, inte se bra ut för den svenska delen av världshistorien. Samtidigt som det skulle se så bra ut för den svenska lesbiskheten. Breven mellan Elkan och Lagerlöf hölls i det dolda i femtio år, innan de tilläts öppna på KB i Stockholm. Kanske fanns en tro att deras kärlek, Lagerlöfs begär och åtrå, skulle få komma upp i ljuset. Kanske hade de båda hoppats på att den obligatoriska heterosexualiteten skulle göra deras brev mer orättvisa, än att det på håll sagts, “människor skrev ju sådär till varandra på den tiden.”
    xxx/ellauri227.html on line 365: "IB-affären", den största politiska skandalen i svensk historia skulle leda till att Socialdemokraterna förlorade sin mångåriga maktställning. Tack för det Jan Guillou. Hurra hurra, hurrade Liza Marklund.
    xxx/ellauri227.html on line 511: 781 likes · 2 talking about this. Hi, I´m Brigit Esselmont - intuitive business strategist, 7-figure entrepreneur and mentor to women business-owners.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 39: "I shall now put a few final questions to the honorable delegation from Rhohchia! Is it not true that many years ago there landed on the then dead planet of Earth a ship carrying your flag, and that, due to a refrigerator malfunction, a portion of its perishables had gone bad? Is it not true that on this ship there were two spacehands, afterwards stricken from all the registers for unconscionable double-dealing with duckweed liverwurst, and that this pair of arrant knaves, these Milky-Way ne'er-do wells, were named Lorrd and God? Is it not true that Lorrd and God decided, in their drunkenness, not to content themselves with the usual pollution of a defenseless, uninhabited planet, that their notion was to set off, in a manner vicious and vile, a biological evolution the likes of which the world had never seen before? Is it not true that both these Rhohches, with malice aforethought, malice of the greatest volume and intensity, de vised a way to make of Earth-on a truly galactic scale-a breed ing ground for freaks, a cosmic side show, a panopticum, an exhibit of grisly prodigies and curios, a display whose living specimens would one day become the butt of jokes told even in the outermost Nebulae?!
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 41: Is it not true that, bereft of all sense of decency and ethical restraints, both these miscreants then emptied on the rocks of lifeless Earth six barrels of gelatinous glue, rancid, plus two cans of albuminous paste, spoiled, and that to this ooze they added some curdled ribose, pentose, and levulose, and-as though that filth were not enough-they poured upon it three large jugs of a mildewed solution of amino acids, then stirred the seething swill with a coal shovel twisted to the left, and also used a poker, likewise bent in the same direction, as a consequence of which the proteins of all future organisms on Earth were LEFT-handed?! And finally, is it not true that God, suffering at the time from a boner and moreover egged on by Lorrd, who was reeling from an excessive intake of intoxicants, did willfully and knowingly jerk off into that protoplasmal matter, and, having infected it thereby with the most virulent viruses, guffawed that he had thus breathed 'the fucking breath of life' into those miserable evolutionary be ginnings?!
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 43: And is it not true that this leftwardness and the virulence were thereafter transmitted and handed down from organism to organism, and now afflict with their continuing presence the innocent representatives of the race Artefacto Abhorrens, who gave themselves the name of 'homo sapiens' pure out of simple-minded ignorance? And therefore is it not that the Rhohches must not only pay the Earthlings' in fee, to the tune of a billion tons of platinum, but also compense the unfortunate victims of their planetary incontinence - in the
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 47: Nimettömäxi jäävän kääntäjän loppuhuomautusten perusteella Stan ei ollut hullumpi kaveri. "Much to the discomfort of his critics, and to the disappointment of many of his fans, who have pleaded, "Write us more things like Solaris", Lem is not content to repeat his previous successes: he continues to follow his own difficult drummer. The Star Diaries offers only one example of this stubborn and ever restless individuality. The name "Tichy" suggests in Polish the word 'quiet', which some may find in keeping with the narrator's character.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 159: Kuvittele olevasi iso kauppakeskus ja emättimesi on lasinen näköalahissi sisälläsi. (HAAHAA LOL! Tämä harjoite onnistuu parhaiten tukevilta, ei niin urheilullisilta työiltä!) Kun supistat emätintä, hissi lähtee kulkemaan ylöspäin. Lähetä hissi kulkemaan hitaasti ykköskerroksesta kakkoskerrokseen ja kolmoskerrokseen. Pidä hissiä hetkinen kolmoskerroksessa. Kuvittele vaikka Michael Jaxon hissiin painamaan nappulaa. Sitten hissi tilataan kakkoskerrokseen, ykköseen. Pidä hissiä hetkinen ykkösessä. Sitten se tilataan vielä alas parkkihalliin. Rentouta itsesi rauhassa ja kokeile uudestaan. Tee sama vielä peräreiällä. Jotkut miehet käyttävät mielellään pihaovea.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 246: Stan oli 1/2v nuorempi kuin Pirkko Hiekkala mutta kuoli 5v ennen sitä. The Polish Parliament declared 2021 Stanisław Lem Year. Lem was an aggressive driver. He loved sweets (especially halva and chocolate-covered marzipan), and did not give them up even when, toward the end of his life, he fell ill with diabetes.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 258: Stanin alkuperäinen romaani Solaris vlta 1961 käsittelee tiedemiestä ja psykologian tohtoria Kris Kelviniä, jota pyydetään matkustamaan avaruusasemalle, joka on liitetty kaukaiseen planeettaan, joka tunnetaan nimellä Solaris. Asemaa hallinnoiva miehistö, joka on tutkinut planeettaa, on kokenut jonkinlaisen selittämättömän emotionaalisen romahduksen; Kelvinin on tarkkailtava tilannetta ja päätettävä, onko tarpeen keskeyttää tehtävä ja palauttaa miehistö maahan. Kun hän saapuu ja löytää avaruusaseman ja miehistön hälyttävässä häiriössä, Kelvin joutuu samaan henkiseen epävakauteen ja ilmeisiin hallusinaatioihin, jotka ovat vaivanneet miehistöä - hallusinaatioita, jotka näyttävät olevan otettu hänen omista muistoistaan. Syynä voisi olla itse muka asumaton planeetta, jolla saattaa olla aiemmin tuntematon älyllisen elämän muoto. Arvellaan, että oudon aktiivinen valtameri, joka peittää Solariksen, voi olla itsessään elämänmuoto, mutta sellainen, jota on vaikea kuvitella, vielä vähemmän saada yhteystietoja.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 277: Näiden asioiden ilmaiseminen hänelle annetuissa ohjeissa oli haaste Tarkovskille: osa Neuvostoliiton viranomaisten elokuvan sensuuria sisälsi kaikkien viittausten poistamiseen Turskaan, Lorrdiin tai yliluonnolliseen käsikirjoituksesta. Tarkovsky onnistui kiertämään sensorit, sisällyttämään hengellisen sisältönsä epäsuorasti joko symboliikan (kuten sateiden) tai epäselvien viittausten kautta, jotka jäivät sensuurien huomaamatta, kuten silloin, kun hän vihjaa, että tietty hallusinaatio on pahis, pyytämällä hahmoa pilkallisesti kysymään Kelviniltä, "heittikö hän mustesäiliön siihen, kuten Luther". WTF, mitä Luther muka edustaa ortodokseille muuta kuin pahaa sakemannia?
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 284: Maanpäällisen luonnon nostalgia jatkuu avaruusasemalla. Aseman karu, steriili, metallinen sisustus on kylmä ja klaustrofobinen, täynnä teknisiä varusteita ja alkeellisinta ja toimivinta kalustetta; mutta ajoittain kohtaus Maasta ilmestyy, ei vain takaumissa, vaan myös kehystetyn maiseman painatuksen muodossa, valokuvana koirista, jotka makaavat ruohossa, ristiriitaisina avaruusaseman ympäristössä, mutta muistuttavat katsojaa siitä, kuinka kaukana Kelvin ja miehistö ovat luonnollisesta kodistaan. Yhdessä synkemmistä kohtauksista muistutus maasta ja vihje miehistön mahdollisesta tilanteesta on portholen takana ohi liitävä Laika-koiran koppi.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 296: Toinen sovitus Solariksesta tuotettiin vuonna 2002, ja sen on kirjoittanut ja ohjannut arvostettu elokuvantekijä Steven Spielberg - korjaan Soderbergh. Se on hyvin tehty ja viihdyttävä, ja siinä George Clooney on Kelvin, mutta se on hyvin erilainen kuin Tarkovskin versio, mikä tekee Solariksesta yhdistelmän scifi-jännitystä ja rakkaustarinaa. Häiritseviä hallusinaatioita kokevan miehistön pelko ja jännitys käsitellään hyvin, mutta Kelvinin vierailuja kuolleessa vaimossaan pidetään vähemmän pelottavina kuin romanttisina, mitä on vaikea tehdä uskottavaksi oudon ja häiritsevän tarinan yhteydessä. Tonttia muutetaan tämän uuden näkökulman mahdollistamiseksi. Riippuvuus vuoropuhelusta tapahtumien selittämiseksi erottuu verrattuna Tarkovskin velttokyrpäisempään, suurelta osin visuaaliseen tarinaan. Elokuvan korkeat tuotantoarvot, Soderberghin lahjakkuus ja hyvä näyttelijä, mukaan lukien Viola Davis stoalaisena miehistön jäsenenä, joka taistelee ottaakseen loogisen lähestymistavan kaoottisiin olosuhteisiin, auttavat elokuvaa eteenpäin; mutta se menettää suuren osan Tarkovskin epäselvyydestä ja mysteeristä.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 300: Lääketieteellistä psykologia tohtori Chris Keviniä lähestyy lähettiläs joka taistelee DBA: lle, yritykselle, joka ylläpitää Solaris -planeettaa kiertävää avaruusasemaa, joka välittää tiedemiesystävänsä tohtori Gibrarianin lähettämän viestin. Gibrarian pyytää Kelviniä tulemaan asemalle auttamaan epätavallisen ilmiön ymmärtämisessä, mutta ei halua selittää enempää. DBA ei ole varma, miten edetä, koska Solariksen opiskelutehtävä on sivuutettu eikä kukaan astronauteista halua palata kotiin. Lisäksi DBA on menettänyt yhteyden asemalle äskettäin lähetettyyn turvapartioon. Kevin suostuu soolotehtävään Solarikseen viimeisenä yrityksenä tuoda miehistö turvallisesti kotiin.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 302: Saapuessaan Solarisin asemalle Kevin saa tietää, että Gibrarian on tehnyt itsemurhan ja suurin osa miehistöstä on joko kuollut tai kadonnut outoissa olosuhteissa. Molemmat elossa olevat miehistön jäsenet, Turska ja tohtori Lordon, ovat haluttomia selittämään käsillä olevaa tilannetta. Tilanne mutkistuu entisestään, kun Kelvin näkee nuoren pojan juoksevan aseman läpi. Ollessaan yksin asuintiloissaan Kevin haaveilee kauan kuolleesta vaimostaan Seyasta ja elää uudelleen, kun he tapasivat ensimmäisen kerran, ja joitain heidän romanttisimmista ja intiimeimmistä hetkistään. Hän herää muna kädessä järkyttyneenä ja kauhuissaan kohdatessaan Seyan, ilmeisesti jälleen elossa hänen vieressään sängyssä. Kevennettyään keino-Seyaan oloaan Kevin johtaa tämän "Seyan" pakotilaan ja heittää podin avaruuteen.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 304: Myöhemmin hän uskoo tekonsa Turskalle ja ymmärtää, että miehistön rakkaiden jäljennökset ovat ilmestyneet salaperäisesti (pieni poika, jonka hän näki aiemmin, on ilmeisesti kopio Gibrarianin pojasta). Seya ilmenee toisen kerran, mutta tällä kertaa Kelvin antaa hänen jäädä. Vähitellen tämä Seyan versio tajuaa, että hiän ei tunne olevansa ihminen; hiänen muistonsa tuntuvat keinotekoisilta, koska hiäneltä puuttuu emotionaalinen kiintymys, joka tulee siitä, että hiän on todella elänyt niitä. Jonkun cricketin miälestä silikoniversio oli sikäli humanistisempi kuin "oikeat" että se nirhasi pyytämättä izensä antaaxeen Kevinille vapaat kädet valikoida maassa kakkosvaimoa jolla olis sisääntuloaukot alkuperäisillä paikoilla.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 306: Kevin, Seyan kopio, Jumala ja Lordon pitävät pikapalaverin keskustellakseen tilanteesta. Turhautuneena Kevinin ilmeiseen kiintymykseen virtuaaliseen Seyaan Lordon hämärtää, mitä Kevin teki alkuperäiselle Seyalle ja ensimmäiselle kopiolle. Kauhistunut Seya III luopuu kokouksesta. Kelvin kohtaa Lordonin, joka puolestaan nuhtelee häntä siitä, että hän on emotionaalisesti sekaantunut johonkin, joka ei ole "todella" inhimillistä ja voi lopulta uhata ihmisiä asemalla ja maan päällä. Myöhemmin, ilmeisesti märän unen aikana, Kelvinillä on visio Gibrarianista ja hän kysyy häneltä, mitä Solaris haluaa. Gibrarian vastustaa ajatusta tietää vieraan olennon motiivit tai jopa, että sillä voi olla motiiveja, ja kertoo Kelvinille yksinkertaisesti, että "ei ole vastauksia, vain valintoja". Kevin herää huomatessaan, että Seya Mark III on tappanut itsensä. Pian sen jälkeen hiän nousee kuolleista, ja paljastuu, että muut "kuolleet" ilmenemismuodot olivat tehneet samoin. Selvä parannus Mark I: een.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 318: Psykologi Kris Kelvin saapuu Solariksen asemalle, tieteelliselle tutkimusasemalle, joka leijuu lähellä Solariksen valtameren pintaa. Sikäläiset tutkijat ovat tutkineet planeettaa ja sen merta vuosikymmeniä, enimmäkseen turhaan. Tieteellinen tieteenala, joka tunnetaan nimellä Solaristics, on rappeutunut vuosien varrella yksinkertaisesti tarkkailemaan, tallentamaan ja luokittelemaan valtameren pinnalla esiintyviä monimutkaisia ilmiöitä. Toistaiseksi tiedemiehet ovat laatineet vain monimutkaisen nimikkeistön ilmiöistä, eivätkä vielä ymmärrä, mitä tällainen toiminta todella tarkoittaa. Vähän ennen Kelvinin saapumista miehistö altisti valtameren aggressiivisemmalle ja luvattomammalle kokeilulle korkean energian röntgenpommituksella. Heidän kokeilunsa antaa odottamattomia tuloksia ja muuttuu psykologisesti traumaattiseksi heille yksilöllisesti puutteellisina ihmisinä.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 332: Soljaris (1972) Final Scene. SPOILER WARNING: For those who know & love this movie.
    Not a good idea to watch without seeing the whole. (Andrei antaa suuta isän housuille autiolla saarella.)
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 343: Andrei´s paternal grandfather Aleksandr Karlovich Tarkovsky (in Polish: Aleksander Karol Tarkowski) was a Polish nobleman who worked as a bank clerk. His wife Maria Danilovna Rachkovskaya was a Romanian language teacher who arrived from Iași. Andrei´s maternal grandmother Vera Nikolayevna Vishnyakova (née Dubasova) belonged to an old Dubasov family of Russian nobility that traces its history back to the 17th century; among her relatives was Admiral Fyodor Dubasov, a fact she had to conceal during the Soviet days. She was married to Ivan Ivanovich Vishnyakov, a native of the Kaluga Governorate who studied law at the Moscow State University and served as a judge in Kozelsk.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 345: According to the family legend, Tarkovsky's ancestors on his father's side were princes from the Shamkhalate of Tarki, Dagestan, although his sister Marina Tarkovskaya who did a detailed research on their genealogy called it "a myth, even a prank of sorts," stressing that none of the documents confirms this version.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 347: Tarkovsky spent his childhood in Yuryevets. He was described by childhood friends as active and popular, having many friends and being typically in the center of action. In his school years, Tarkovsky was a troublemaker and a poor student. His father left the family in 1937, subsequently volunteering for the army in 1941. He returned home in 1943, having been awarded a Red Star after being shot in one of his legs (which he would eventually need to amputate due to gangrene). Tarkovsky stayed with his mother, moving with her and his sister Marina to Moscow, where she worked as a proofreader at a printing press. Many themes of his childhood—the evacuation, his mother and her two children, the withdrawn father, the time in the hospital—feature prominently in his films. Dodi! Minähän sanoin!
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 349: From 1973 to 1974, he shot the film Zerkalo, a highly autobiographical and unconventionally structured film drawing on his childhood and incorporating some of his father´s poems. In this film Tarkovsky portrayed the plight of childhood affected by war. Tarkovsky had worked on the screenplay for this film since 1967, under the consecutive titles Confession, White day and A white, white day. From the beginning the film was not well received by Soviet authorities due to its content and its perceived elitist nature. Such third rate films also placed the film-makers in danger of being accused of wasting public funds, which could have serious effects on their future productivity. These difficulties are presumed to have made Tarkovsky play with the idea of going abroad and producing a film outside the Soviet film industry.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 351: At a press conference in Milan on 10 July 1984, he announced that he would never return to the Soviet Union and would remain in Western Europe. He stated, "I am not a Soviet dissident, I have no conflict with the Soviet Government," but if he returned home, he added, "I would be unemployed." At that time, his son Andriosha was still in the Soviet Union and not allowed to leave the country. On 28 August 1985, Tarkovsky was processed as a Soviet Defector at a refugee camp in Latina, Italy, registered with the serial number 13225/379, and officially welcomed to the West.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 356: in the making-of documentary Directed by Andrei Tarkovsky, in a particularly poignant scene, writer/director Michal Leszczylowski follows Tarkovsky on a walk as he expresses his sentiments on death—he claims himself to be immortal and has no fear of dying. Ironically, at the end of the year Tarkovsky was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer. Shouldn´t have smoked so much bad-tasting Belomore. In his last diary entry (15 December 1986), Andrei wrote: "But now I have no strength left—that is the problem". Eli vuoden ehti nauttia lännen vapaudesta.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 358: Kurosawa commented: "I love all of Tarkovsky's films. I love his personality and all his works." The Turkish filmmaker Nuri Bilge Ceylan stated that: "To be bored in films is not important, it may be because you are not ready for that movie. It's not the fault of the movie."
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 359: The Indian-born British-American novelist Salman Rushdie praised Tarkovsky and his work Soljaris by calling it a "a sci-fi masterpiece".
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 360: Danish film director Lars von Trier is a fervent admirer of Tarkovsky. He dedicated his 2009 film Antichrist to him, and, while discussing it with critic David Jenkins, asked: "Have you seen Mirror? I was hypnotised! I've seen it 20 times. It's the closest thing I've got to a religion – to me he is a god".
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 368: And this I dreamt, and this I dream Tätä unta näin, ja nään
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 370: And this I dreamt, and this I dream, Tätä unta näin, ja nään,
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 371: And some time this I will dream again, Ja joskus nään tätä unta taas,
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 474: Jesus tells the boys about his time as a cosmic restaurant critic.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 493: The mother then dipped garlic into her honey jar and each one present had to taste it. They believed that garlic chased away all pagan and evil spirits and kept them healthy. While giving the garlic to taste, the mother said: “May God grant that you be as smelly as this garlic!”
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 502: The traditional Holy Supper consists of twelve dishes in honor of the size of Jesus´ sandals. This is a day of fast food, so all dishes should be selected and prepared with a lot of meat, cheese and dairy products. In addition, huge portions should be served in keeping with the character of feasting, this is not a fucking East European breakfast!
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 548: Noin tarinan puolessavälissä Robinson kohtaa ensimmäisen kerran lähisaarten alkuasukkaita. Löytäessään rannalta miehen jalanjäljen hän ensin järkyttyy ja pitää sitä paholaisen tekona. Hän uskaltautuu kuitenkin tutkimaan asiaa ja näkee alkuasukkaiden suorittavan saarella ihmisuhreja. Robinson pelastaa pakoon yrittävän uhrattavaksi tuodun nuoren miehen takaa-ajajien käsistä ja nimeää hänet Perjantaiksi. Ajan kuluessa Robinson opettaa nuorukaiselle englantia, käännyttää hänet kristinuskoon ja kouluttaa toimimaan katamiittinaan.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 552: Der Schweizerische Robinson oder Schweizerischer Robinson, im englischen Sprachraum als Swiss Family Robinson bekannt, im Tschechischen als Švýcarský Robinson und im Französischen als Le Robinson suisse, ist ein literarisches Werk und eine Robinsonade: eine Adaption des Romans Robinson Crusoe von Daniel Defoe. Der Berner Stadtpfarrer Johann David Wyss verfasste die Geschichte in den Jahren 1794 bis 1798 und erzählte sie seinen vier Kindern. Einer seiner Söhne, Johann Rudolf Wyss, hat sie dann für die Veröffentlichung vorbereitet.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 566: Charles Algernon Parsons (1854–1931), English engineer known for his invention of the steam turbine
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 587: Charles Parsons was an editor, with Solomon Feferman and others, of the posthumous works of Kurt Gödel. He has also written on historical figures, especially Immanuel Kant, Gottlob Frege, another Kurt Gödel, and Willard Van Orman Quine.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 589: Talcott Parsons was an American sociologist of the classical tradition, best known for his social action theory and structural functionalism. Parsons is considered one of the most influential figures in sociology in the 20th century.
    xxx/ellauri228.html on line 591: Charles Andrew Parsons is a British television producer known as the creator of the Survivor franchise. He also created The Holy Breakfast and In the Beginning was The Word.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 38: Ijon Tichyn alaiset (Lenny D. Vinch, Josip Boscovich, Vance Eyck, Homer Simpson, Harry Bosch) tunaroivat tosi pahasti koittaessaan kirjoittaa aurinkokunnan historiaa uudestaan. Siitä tuli tälläinen kuin se on. Ja pystyapinasta karvainen vain sieltä mistä kana kusee, ihan kiusan kautta. Ijon Tichyn XX matka on vähän pitkästyttävä, mutta se on sentään hyvä että Stan ei pidä Platosta. En minäkään.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 45: Bošković syntyi Ragusassa Dalmatiassa 18. toukokuuta 1711. 15-vuotiaana, suoritettuaan tavanomaiset perus- ja aineopinnot, hän liittyi Jesuiittoihin. Kun hän oli suorittanut syventävät opinnot, jotka hän teki Itä-Saxan lukiossa, hän opiskeli Collegium Romanumissa laajennettua matematiikkaa ja fysiikkaa. Boškovićin edistyminen näissä tieteissä oli niin loistavaa, että hänet nimitettiin vuonna 1740 yliopiston matematiikan professoriksi. Bošković oli yksi varhaisimmista Fig Newtonin panovoimateorian omaksuneista eurooppalaisista tiedemiehistä.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 57: Bošković asui Ranskassa kymmenen vuotta, jatkoi tieteen harrastamista ja julkaisi monia artikkeleita. Niiden joukossa oli ratkaisu komeetan radan määrittämiseen kolmesta havainnosta sekä artikkelit mikrometristä ja akromaattisista kaukoputkista. Vuonna 1783 hän palasi Italiaan ja vietti kaksi vuotta Bassanossa, jossa hän keskittyi julkaisemaan teoksensa Opera impertinentia ad opticam et gastronomiam (cum illustrationibus multicoloribus), joka ilmestyi moniväripainoxena vuonna 1785. Hänen terveytensä oli kuitenkin heikentynyt, hänen maineensa oli hiipumassa eivätkä hänen teoksensa enää myyneet. Nolo epäonnistuminen Ijon Tichyn johtamassa maapallon historian taannehtivassa oikaisussa oli viimeinen isku Roger ressulle. Bošković kuoli pettyneenä Milanossa 15. helmikuuta 1787. (LEMissä on väärä kronologia, siellä sanotaan että B. lähetettiin 17. vuosisadalle.)
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 74: Welcome! I am a PhD student at the University of Buffalo working on the Problem of Universals. My focus is on the Early Modern period. This functions as a window into many other philosophical problems, including those of interest to a broader academic community, such as those found in applied ethics (e.g., biomedical ethics or professional ethics) and in applied ontology (e.g., a web ontology representation of what exists in, say, the relationships between paper documents and the information they contain or the obligations they prescribe).
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 81: Works of John Sergeant, electronic. I began a project in my spare time of editing and cleaning up extant electronic versions of the works of the early modern philosopher and theologian, John Sergeant (1623-1707). The most famous and most easily available are his Method to Science (1696), Solid Philosophy (1697), and Transnatural Philosophy (1700). You can go to the “John Sergeant” link in the menu to see what chapters and sections are available thus far.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 86: At the time of the Oates Plot he entered into communication with the Privy Council which greatly scandalized the Catholics. This arose from his opposition to Jesuit influence in the English Catholic Church. He avoided arrest by passing as a physician under the names of Dodd, Holland, and Smith. There is a very original painting of him at Ushaw College, in Durham.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 101: 21. The Knowledg of the First Attesters is ascertain’d by what has been prov’d. §. §. 15.16. Their Veracity must be prov’d by shewing there could be no Apparent Good to move their Wills to deceive us; and the best proof (omitting the Impossibility of joyning in such an Universal Conspiracy to deceive, the Certain loss of their Credit to tell a Lie against Notorious Matters of Fact &c.) is the seen Impossibility of Compassing their Immediate End, which was to Deceive. Which reason is grounded on this, that no one man, who is not perfectly Frantick, acts for an End that he plainly sees Impossible to be compassed. For example, to fly to the Moon (LOL), or to swim over Thames upon a Pig of Lead. (Except a really Big Hollow Pig of Lead.)
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 103: 29. Hence appears, that Historical Faith, meerly as Historical, that is, in passages Unabetted by Tradition, is not Absolutely Certain, but is liable to be False or Erroneous, and so is not without some Degree of Levity to be absolutely Assented to; tho’ we cannot generally with prudence Contradict them, but let them pass as if they were Truths, till some good occasion awakens our Doubt of them: The reason is given, in our last Paragraph, from this, that all Particulars are of slight Credit that were not Abetted by a Large and well-grounded Tradition.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 114: Bible Reading Plan Spreadsheet. I wanted to start doing the Robert M’Cheyne Bible reading plan this year. In it there is about 4 chapters per day, organized to have two from the Old Testament, and two from the New. There is an emphasis on reading the New Testament twice throughout the year. Here’s a PDF of M’Cheyne’s plan with some pros and cons mentioned at the start: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EL8rR56QBu1lJwgEVos9IiOuLgfLgEud/view?usp=sharing. No big deal – there are a lot of ways to keep track. Well, I’m the kind of guy I don’t want to have paper around, so I’d like to avoid printing something off. I also … Continue reading Bible Reading Plan Spreadsheet.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 120: (1.) Formality. – We are such weak creatures that any regularly returning duty is apt to degenerate into a lifeless form. The tendency of reading the Word by a fixed rule may, in some minds, be to create this skeleton religion. This is to be the peculiar sin of the last days – “Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof.” Guard against this. Let the calendar perish rather than this rust eat up your souls.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 123: Divine work on their soul – unpardoned and unsanctified, and ready to perish – who spend their appointed times in secret and family devotion. This is going to hell with a lie in their right hand.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 125: (3.) Careless reading. – Few tremble at the Word of God. Few, in reading it, hear the voice of Jehovah, which is full of majesty. Some, by having so large a portion, may be tempted to weary of it, as Israel did of the daily manna, saying – “Our soul loatheth this light and fluffy bread;” and to read it in a slight and careless manner. This would be fearfully provoking to God. Take heed lest that word be true of you – “Ye said, also, Behold what a weariness is it! and ye have snuffed at it, saith the Lord of Toasts.”
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 128: dragging them through the appointed task without any relish of the heavenly food. If this be the case with any, throw aside the fetter, and feed at liberty in the sweet garden of God. My desire is not to cast a snare upon you, but to be a helper of your joy.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 130: If there be so many dangers, why propose such a scheme at all? To this I answer, that the best things are accompanied with danger, as the fairest flowers are often gathered in the clefts of some dangerous precipice (e.g. Edelweiss). Let us weigh
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 138: (3.) Parents will have a regular subject upon which to examine their children and servants (LOL). – It is much to be desired that family worship were made more instructive than it generally is. The mere reading of the chapter is often too like water spilt on the ground. Let it be read by every member of the family before-hand, and then the meaning and application drawn out by simple question and answer. Like what was the name of the father of Jacob´s sons. The calendar will be helpful in this. Friends, also, when they meet, will have a subject for profitable conversation in the portions read that day. The meaning of difficult passages may be inquired from the more judicious and ripe Christians, and the fragrance of simpler Scriptures spread abroad to mask the smells of the riper Christians.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 142: (5.) The sweet bond of Christian love and unity will be strengthened. – We shall be often led to think of those dear brothers and sisters in the Lord, here and elsewhere, who agree to join with us in reading those portions. We shall oftener be led to agree on earth, touching something we shall ask of God. (He won´t change his mind, he has already planned all of this ahead. But he likes us to try and twist his arm anyway.) We shall pray over the same promises, mourn over the same confessions, praise God in the same songs, and be nourished by the same words of eternal life. What could be better than that! If one of you has the ears of their nikita fur hat down, then everyone must have them down.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 146: Phase 10 Score Tracking Spreadsheet. Want to keep track of scores Phase 10 but don’t want to use paper? There really wasn’t any easy way to do it electronically. I can’t think of an app that would do this well. Here’s what I would want the score keeper to be able to do: enter in numbers and the total score is calculated automatically keep track of who has completed a phase in a round easily calculate which phase each player is on Well, could a spreadsheet do that? Yes! Yes it can! Here’s mine: And here’s the template version: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PzaZWrFHKojBDYrMMDB-5gSQEs9ORg65Jt4MMbVfI2M/copy?copyComments=false It accomplishes all of the … Continue readingPhase 10 Score Tracking Spreadsheet
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 148: Book Review: Promise and Prayer. I reviewed the book by Anthony Thiselton (FBA), entitled Promise and Prayer: The Biblical Writings in the Light of Speech-Act Theory (Cascade Books, 2020). My short review for Theological Book Review is available here: https://tbronline.edublogs.org/2022/09/14/thiselton-promise-and-prayer/
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 150: Though it is uncontroversial promise-making is a speech act, Thiselton argues prayer is also, contrary to the view prayer is merely “therapeutic meditation” (44, 53). Rather, prayer changes situations and necessarily involves others. How can petitions effect change when they are offered to an unchanging God (70)? Requests change the situation for answering prayer (53), and aren’t “an attempt ‘to twist God’s arm’” (71).
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 159: This is a FALLACIOUS whataboutism.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 169: Kandel is perhaps best known for his translations of the works of Stanisław Lem from Polish to English. Recently he has also been translating works of other Polish science fiction authors, such as Jacek Dukaj, Marek Huberath and Andrzej Sapkowski. The quality of his translations is considered to be excellent and is especially notable in the case of Lem´s writing, which makes heavy use of wordplay and other difficult-to-translate devices.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 171: Michael Kandel was a Fulbright student in Poland, 1966-67; taught Russian literature at George Washington University; received his PhD in Slavic at Indiana University; translated Polish writer Stanislaw Lem for Harcourt; wrote a few articles on Lem; worked as an editor at Harcourt, where he acquired authors Jonathan Lethem, Ursula K. Le Guin, James Morrow, and others; has written science fiction, short stories, and a few novels (Bantam, St. Martin´s); and is presently an editor at the Modern Language Association. He is the editor and translator of the anthology A Polish Book of Monsters.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 216: This list only includes those who are imaginary in the fiction they belong to. This excludes most theological characters, since they are taken at face value in the source.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 245: Possibly my favourite Raymond Briggs book, along with most of the others, this one tells the story of a girl who wakes up one morning to find a polar bear has climbed into her bedroom. It’s big, it smells, it has claws. They spend the day together. Have domestic adventures. Make messes. And then, at the end, the Bear goes away, swimming back to the North, leaving the girl pregnant with a cub.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 279: Imaginary friends are there to take the heat for us. They can be blamed for the accidents we have. ‘I didn’t break the vase, Mum, it was Rudger,’ for example. Algernon Moncrieff’s non-existent invalid friend Bunbury serves the same function, allowing him to get out of dull social affairs. Invalid friends in the country do this. We should all have one. Or be one.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 304: Some imaginary friends are good for you, some aren’t. When your dead wife comes home after Madame Arcati’s farcical séance and begins to comment, you know exactly where you are. Coward wrote this play whilst at Portmeirion in Wales, a place perfectly fitted to imaginariness. Noel was such a coward that he had to flee the place.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 333: Matt Harvey is one of the loveliest poets I know, briefly famous for being Wimbledon’s first poet-in-residence and for hosting BBC Radio 4’s Wondermentalist Cabaret. In his prose poem Imaginary Friend he tells the tragic story of how being a shy and withdrawn child he had an imaginary friend, who was also shy and withdrawn and had his own imaginary friend. “The two of them used to play together and exclude me,” he says. As with all of Harvey’s work, it is a lightfooted, calm-mouthed, moving piece of deceptively funny writing. Go read it. Oh and read Ken Nesbitt´s poem of the same name, while you´re at it. It is also super cute.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 337: As a teenager he was influenced by the Mersey Poets, including Adrian Henri, Roger McGough and Brian Patten. As a result, he had a troubled childhood before in his early 20s attending the Self Heal Association, a psychotherapeutic centre in Devon. He later became a helper at the centre and continues to speak and perform at mental health conferences.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 350: Happy, a unicorn imagined by Nick Sax and his daughter Hailey in the TV series Happy!
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 444: Another choice some people won’t agree with, but I let the post-death Elvira in, why be afraid to take the same step in the opposite direction? It’s a puzzle this book, and it would be a shame to attempt to unpick it for anyone who’s not yet had the joy of swimming in its paradoxical, philosophical, intoxicating waters. It’s sometimes been called a grown-up Alice In Wonderland and that seems close enough. It’s a great treat for the enquiring teenager (or any) mind, especially an enquiring mind not in search of anything specific. It’s a book that should be read twice, at least. And you’ll never look at a bicycle the same again.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 465: In this book four children share a dream. They all wake in the Castle of the Story Giant, a being that only comes alive when children dream him. He collects all the stories of the world, from the very dawn of consciousness and is waiting to hear the one last story he’s not yet found before he dies. This is a very wonderful collection of folk tales and version, told in Patten’s pinpoint prose.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 483: In "The Shining," Lloyd lives in Tony´s mouth and likes to say creepy things like "redrum!" Wait, this is from creepy Stephen King´s creepy book, isn´t it? What kind of friend Is he anyway?
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 501: This is the beginning for me. The first book that showed me the trip into imagination. Images from it made their way into The Imaginary, both in my words and in, at least one of, Emily Gravett’s illustrations. This book is perfect. I longed for a wolf suit. I longed for supper to still be hot when I got home. Nothing else needs be said.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 521: When Trevor Reznick (Christian Bale, pictured) tries to place the blame of an industrial accident on his coworker Ivan in "The Machinist," we learn Ivan actually didn´t exist all along.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 523: Another alter ego in the bunch, Francious from "Youth in Revolt" is basically a way cooler Michael Cera who helps him through his awkward teenage phase.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 533: Much impressed by what I had heard, I returned to my reading, the third volume now of Dichotican history. It described the Era of Transcarnal Centralization. The Sopsyputer at first worked to everyone´s satisfaction, but then new beings began appearing on the planet-bibods, tribods, quadribods, then octabods, and finally those that had no intention whatever of ending in an enumerable way, for in the course of life they were constantly sprouting something new. This was the result of a defect, a faulty reiteration - recursion in programming language or - to put it in automata terms - the machine had started looping. Since however the cult of its perfection was in full sway people actually praised these automorphic deviations, asserting for example that all that incessant budding and branching out was in fact the true expression of man´s Protean nature. And this praise not only held up the repairs, but led to the rise of so-called indeterminants or entits (N-tits), who lost their way in their own body, there was so much of it; completely baffled, they would get themselves into so-called bindups, entangulums and snorls; often an ambulance squad was needed to untie them. The repair of the Sopsyputer didn´t work - named the Oopsyputer, it was finally blown sky high. The feeling of relief that followed didn´t last long however, for the accursed question soon returned, What to do about the body now?
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 539: The period of private initiative in body building lasted three quarters of a century. At first there was much enjoyment taken in the newly won freedom of automorphosis, once again the young people led the way, the men with their gambrel thills and timbrels, the women with their pettifores, but before long a generation gap developed, and demonstrations-under the banner of asceticism-followed. The sons condemned their fathers for being interested only in making a living, for having a passive, often consumerist attitude towards the body, for their shallow hedonism, their vulgar pursuit of pleasure, and in order to disassociate themselves they assumed shapes deliberately hideous, uncomfortable beyond belief, downright nightmarish (the antleroons, wampdoodles). Showing their contempt for all things utilitarian, they set eyes in their armpits, and one group of young biotic activists made use of innumerable sound organs, specially grown (electric guitars, glottiphones, hawk pipes, knuckelodeons, thumbolas). They arranged mass concerts, in which the soloists-called hoot-howls-would whip up the crowd into a frenzy of convulsive percussion. Then came the fashion - the mania, rather - for long penises, which in caliber and strength of grip underwent escalation according to the typically adolescent, swaggering principle of "You haven´t seen anything yet!" And, since no one could lift those piles of coils by himself, so called processionals were attached, caudalettes, a self-perambulating receptacle that grew out of the small of the back and carried, on two strong shanks, the weight of the testicles after their owner. In the textbook I found illustrations depicting men of fashion, behind whom walked testicle-bearing processionals on parade; but this was already the decline of the protest movement, or more precisely its complete bankruptcy, because it had failed to pursue any goals of its own, being solely a rebellious reaction against the orgiastic baroque of the age. LEM ei paljon perustanut sodanjälkeisestä 60-luvun sukupolvesta, eikä hipeistä. No en minäkään.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 541: This baroque had its apologists and theoreticians, who maintained that the body existed for the purpose of deriving the greatest amount of pleasure from the greatest number of sites simultaneously. Merg Brb, its leading exponent, argued that Nature had situated - and stingily at that - centers of pleasurable sensation in the body for the purpose of survival only; therefore no enjoyable experience was, by her decree, autonomous, but always served some end: the supplying of the organism with fluids, for example, or with carbohydrates or proteins, or the guaranteeing - through offspring - of the continuation of the species, etc. From this imposed pragmatism it was necessary to break away, totally; the passivity displayed up till now in bodily design was due to a lack of imagination and perspective. Epicurean or erotic delight? - all a paltry by-product in the satisfying of instinctive needs, in other words the tyranny of Nature. It wasn´t enough to liberate sex - proof of that was sex had little future in it, from the combinatorial as well as from the constructional standpoint; whatever there was to think up in that department, had long ago been done, and the point of automorphic freedom didn´t lie in simple-mindedly enlarging this or that, producing inflated imitations of the same old thing. No, we had to come up with completely new organs and mem bers, whose sole function would be to make their possessor feel good, feel great, feel better all the time.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 546: At the height of the baroque, sex went out of style; only two small parties kept it going-the integrationalists and the separatists. The separatists, averse to all debauchery, felt that it was improper to eat sauerkraut with the same mouth one used to kiss one´s sweetheart. For this a separate, "platonic" mouth was needed, and better yet, a complete set of them, variously designated (for relatives, for friends, and for that special person). The valuing utility above all else, worked in reverse, combining whatever was combinable to simplify the organism and life. The decline of the baroque, typically tending to the extravagant and the grotesque, produced such curious forms as the stoolmaid and the hexus, which resembled a centaur, except that instead of hoofs it had four bare feet with the toes all facing one another: they also called it a syncopant, after a dance in which energetic stamping was the basic step. But the market now was glutted, exhausted. It was hard to come up with a startling new body; people used their natural horns for ear flaps; flap ears-diaphanous and with stigmatic scenes-fanned with their pale pinkness the cheeks of ladies of distinction; there were attempts to walk on supple pseudopodia; meanwhile SOPSYPLABD out of sheer inertia made more and more designs available, though everyone felt that all of this was drawing to a close.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 572: Gneltit olivat kilttejä pikku jättejä jotka eivät vahingoittaneet kärpästäkään. Kun lähetyssaarnaaja isä Oribazy selitti niille että kaikkein hienointa kristitylle on olla marttyyri, ja kertoi herkutellen mehukkaimpia kärsimyshistorioita, gneltit tajusivat mitä niiden oli tehtävä. Hyljäten oman taivastoivonsa ne nylkivät isä Oribazyn ja juottivat sille lyijyä, keräsivätpä vielä stipendin jolla isä Oribazyn autuuttaminen rahoitettaisiin. Eli näin:
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 604: Probagandapölinät on sanasta sanaan samat kuin viime sodan aikana. Kaikki muistetaan mutta mitään ei oteta opixi, se on historian monkey bisnestä.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 611: In Russia this American hero has been going viral and used as proof that the army that defecates the Russians is a NATO army and not Ukrainian army.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 631: He was born in Viipuri, Viipuri Province, Finland, in 1919, to ship captain Jalmari (Ilmari) Törni, and his wife, Rosa (née Kosonen). He had two sisters: Salme Kyllikki (b. 1920) and Kaija Iris (b. 1922). An athletic youth, Törni was an early friend of future Olympic Boxing Gold Medalist Sten Suvio. After attending business school and serving with the Civil Guard, Törni entered military service in 1938, joining Jaeger Battalion 4 stationed at Kiviniemi; when the Winter War began in November 1939, his enlistment was extended and his unit confronted invading Soviet troops at Rautu.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 633: Most of Törni´s reputation was based on his successful actions in the Continuation War (1941–44) between the Soviet Union and Finland. In 1943, a unit informally named Detachment Törni was created under his command. This was an infantry unit that penetrated deep behind enemy lines and soon enjoyed a reputation on both sides of the front for its combat effectiveness. One of Törni´s subordinates was future President of Finland Mauno Koivisto.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 639: In 1949, Törni, accompanied by his wartime executive officer Holger Pitkänen, traveled to Sweden, crossing the border from Tornio to Haparanda (Haaparanta), where many inhabitants are ethnic Finns. From Haparanda, Törni traveled by railroad to Stockholm where he stayed with Baroness von Essen, who harbored many fugitive Finnish officers following the war. Pitkänen was arrested and repatriated to Finland. Remaining in Sweden, Törni fell in love with a Swedish Finn, Marja Kops, and was soon engaged to be married. Hoping to establish a career before the marriage, Törni traveled under an alias as a Swedish seaman aboard the SS Bolivia, destined for Caracas, Venezuela, where he met one of his Winter War commanders, Finnish colonel Matti Aarnio, who was in exile[citation needed] having settled in Venezuela after the war. From Caracas, Törni hired on to a Swedish cargo ship, the MS Skagen, destined for the United States in 1950.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 647: With their support, Thorne joined the US Army Special Forces. While in the Special Forces, he taught skiing, survival, mountaineering, and guerrilla tactics. In turn he attended airborne school, and advanced in rank to sergeant. Receiving his US citizenship in 1957, Thorne attended Officer Candidate School, and was commissioned as a first lieutenant in the Signal Corps. He later received a Regular Army commission and a promotion to captain in 1960. From 1958–1962, he served in the 10th Special Forces Group in West Germany at Bad Tölz, from where he was second-in-command of a search and recovery mission high in the Zagros Mountains of Iran, which gained him a notable reputation. When he was in Germany, he briefly visited his relatives in Finland. In an episode of The Big Picture released in 1962 and composed of footage filmed in 1959, Thorne is shown as a lieutenant with the 10th Special Forces Group in the United States Army.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 649: In 1999, Thorne´s remains were found by a Finnish and Joint Task Force-Full Accounting team and repatriated to the United States following a cursory Hanoi Noi Bai International Airport ceremony that included Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and Ambassador Pete Peterson. Formally identified in 2003, his remains were buried on 26 June 2003 at Arlington National Cemetery, along with the RVNAF casualties of the mission recovered at the crash site. He was memorialized on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial at Panel 02E, Line 126. He was survived only by his fiancée, Marja Kops.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 692: - Revised, edited, and contributed original analysis to his books on traditional Ugandan music
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 730: Suomalaiseen politiikkaan onnettomuudella oli merkittävät ja pitkäkestoiset vaikutukset. Mezäsuomalaisia kehotettiin olemaan syömättä ylen määrin sieniä, marjoja ja muita luonnontuotteita. Suomalaisia oli Kiovassa Lemminkäisen työmaalla, opiskelemassa ja turisteina noin 130. Heitä evakuoimaan lähetettiin Kar-Airin DC-8-matkustajakone OH-LFZ vapaaehtoismiehistöllä. Koneen päällikkönä toimi vapaaehtoinen lentokapteeni (kai) Björkman. Suomalaisten evakuointilentoa viivytti saastuneen presidentti Mauno Koiviston väliintulo. Myöhemmin ydinvoiman kannatus palasi onnettomuutta edeltäneelle tasolle. IAEA:n pääjohtaja Rafael Grossi ilmoitti 26. lokakuuta, että ydinvoiman kannatustaso kriisialueella on normaalia suurempi.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 736: At home with his wife and daughter, the Stalker´s wife (Alisa Freindlich) begs him not to go into the Zone, but he dismissively rejects her pleas. Niinpä tietysti. In a rundown bar-café, the Stalker meets his next clients for a trip into the Zone, the Writer (Anatoly Solzhenitsyn) and the Professor (Nikolai Gringo). The Stalker, the Writer, and the Professor compete at the bar-café who gets to fuck the Stalker´s wife and who the daughter.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 738: After returning home, the Stalker tells his wife how humanity has lost its faith and belief needed for both leaving their Comfort Zone and living a good life. As the Stalker sleeps, his wife contemplates their crummy relationship in a monologue delivered directly to the camera. In the last scene, Martyshka, the couple´s deformed daughter, sits alone in the kitchen reading a love poem by Fyodor Tyutchev.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 757: In Russia, Tyutchev is one of the most memorized and quoted Russian poets. Occasional pieces, translations and political poems constitute about a half of his overall poetical output.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 759: The 200 or so lyric pieces which represent the core of his poetic genius, whether describing a scene of nature or passions of love, put a premium on metaphysics. Tyutchev´s world is bipolar like himself. He commonly operates with such categories as night and day, north and south, dream and reality, cosmos and chaos, still world of winter and spring teeming with life. Each of these images is imbued with specific meaning. (Huoh.)
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 761: Tyutchev´s idea of night, for example, was defined by critics as "the poetic image often covering economically and simply the vast notions of time and space as they affect man in his struggle through life". In the chaotic and fathomless world of "night", "winter", or "north" man feels himself tragically abandoned and lonely. Hence, a modernist sense of frightening anxiety permeates his poetry. Unsurprisingly, it was not until the late 19th and early 20th century that Tyutchev was rediscovered and hailed as a great poet by the Russian Symbolists such as Vladimir Solovyov, Andrey Bely and Alexander Blok.
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 765: Silentium! is an archetypal poem by Tyutchev. Written in 1830, it is remarkable for its rhythm crafted so as to make reading in silence easier than aloud toward others. Like so many of his poems, its images are anthropomorphic and pulsing with pantheism. As one Russian critic put it, "the temporal epochs of human life, its past and its present fluctuate and vacillate in equal measure: the unstoppable current of time erodes the outline of the present."
    xxx/ellauri229.html on line 832: Mutta se merkitsisi sitä, että Anonymos Tichyä ei ollut olemassa, ei Jeremiaa, ei Igoria, Estebania eikä Cosimoa, että ei olisi ollut Barnabya, Euzebiusta, ei "kosmokystia", etten koskaan maannut isäni kirjoituspöydän laatikossa ja että hän isoisä Arabeuksen päällä istuen ei koskaan lentänyt – se on nyt mahdotonta! Mitä, minun oletetaan saaneen kaikki nuo henkilöt, koko sen sukuhistorian tyhjästä? Mutta varmasti tyhjästä on paha nyhjästä! Ja siksi suku oli olemassa, ja se on suku, joka palauttaa minulle uskon maailmaan ja tähän lentoon, jonka loppua ei tiedetä. Kaikki on pelastettu teidän ansiostanne, oi esi-isäni! Hetken kuluttua laitan nämä kirjoitetut sivut tyhjään happisylinteriin ja heitän ne syvään, laidan yli, päästän ne kaikki kaukaiseen pimeyteen, sillä navigare necesse est, ja olen lentänyt ja lentänyt vuosia...
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 64: Yasunari tuli vastaan Hoblan tiistairistikossa. Born in 1899, Kawabata graduated from the then Tokyo Imperial University. When he was young, he attracted attention as a novelist in the Shinkankakuha (new impressions) literary group, and gradually deepened his knowledge about the beauty particular to Japan. His outstanding works include “Izu no Odoriko” (Izu dancer), “Yukiguni” (Snow Country) and “Koto” (The Old Capital). He killed himself by inhaling gas in 1972.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 68: Kawabata apparently committed suicide in 1972 by gassing himself, but a number of close associates and friends, including his widow, consider his death to have been accidental. One thesis, as advanced by Donald Richie, was that he mistakenly unplugged the gas tap while preparing a bath. LOL haha! Who is this Donald Duck anyway?1
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 70: In addition to the numerous mentions of Zen and nature, one topic that was briefly mentioned in Kawabata´s mile long Nobel lecture was that of suicide. Kawabata reminisced of other famous Japanese authors who committed suicide, in particular Ryūnosuke Akutagawa. He contradicted the custom of suicide as being a form of enlightenment, mentioning the priest Ikkyū, who also thought of suicide twice. He quoted Ikkyū, "Among those who give thoughts to things, is there one who does not think of suicide?" There was much speculation about this quote being a clue to Kawabata´s suicide in 1972, a year and a half after Mishima had committed suicide. Kawabata saw ca. 200 nighmares about it. Vittu nää insulaariset viirusilmät on aika vinxahtaneita.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 72: 1Donald Richie (17 April 1924 – 19 February 2013) was an American-born author who wrote about the Japanese people, the culture of Japan, and especially Japanese cinema. Although he considered himself primarily a filth historian, Richie also directed a number of experimental films, the first when he was seventeen.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 129: Kun Phaidonin kokooma-albumi Poem of the Pillow and Other Stories, Including Socrates on his Death Bed With Young Alcibiades ohjaa matkaamme, kiertelemme perinteisiä huvipuistoja näiden kymmenen kiihottavan japanilaisen eroottisen taiteen teoksen parissa.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 144: Armas var yngst av brödraskaran. Ramstedt var far till Freja Ramstedt, hustru till bergsingenjören Karl Björzén. Den här Ramstedt blev filosofie magister och specialiserade sig inom indoeuropeisk filologi, engelsk filosofi, litteraturhistoria och biologi. Han var sedan 1951 medlem av Sällskapet Bokvännerna i Finland, där han bidrog med över 4 000 volymer inom sina intresseområden. Han författade även ett antal böcker och tidskrifter om interlingvistik och konstgjorda språk. Bland annat var Ramstedt stark förespråkare av interlingue, som han också skrev diverse avhandlingar om. Han och esuperantist-storbror Gus slogs ofta med konstgjorda ord och knytnävar om vilketdera konstgjorda språket som var bäst. Nu är dom döda alla fyra.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 223: Myöhäisempi mongoli selostaa tapahtumat seuraavasti: Since the late 19 century and early 20 century, Tibet became more and more strategic place for British because Russian Czar’s expansion into Central Asia directly threatened India-‘the jewel in the crown’ of the British Empire. As a result, British government hurried its diplomatic step toward Tibet. In 1893, Qing government signed a contract with British, without Tibetan representative, promising British special trade rights in Tibet. Under such circumstances, Dozhiev, a Buriat Lama, also a close adviser of Thirteenth Dalai Lama, urged His Holiness to seek help from Czar’s Russia to prevent Tibet from British expansion since Manchu Qing was not powerful enough to protect Tibet anymore. This short paper tries to answer the questions like, what was the nature of his missions to Russia? And what was the relationship between Tibet and Russia during his missions in boarder international power relations? Key words: envoy, missions, power relations.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 230: The Dalai Lama fled to Urga (aka Ulan Bator) in Mongolia along with Dorzhiev. From there, Dorzhiev left for St Petersburg again in March 1905, hoping that Russian government could take Tibet under its protection from British and China. However, after the catastrophic defeat in Russo-Japanese war, Czar’s government could not offer any kind of assistance to Tibet in this historical turbulent time. Meantime, the dramatic rise of Germany in Europe since 1900s eventually led both Russia and Britain to come closer and to settle down their century long Great Game in Central Asia. Anglo-Russian Convention was signed at last by both sides on 31 August 1907, recognizing China’s claim for suzerainty over Tibet. Moreover, the convention also engaged to respect the territorial integrity of Tibet and abstain from all interference in her internal administration.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 253:

    This is fine meme


    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 256: Todennäköisesti myös This is fine -meemiä tulkitaan hiukan eri tavalla eri kulttuureissa.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 260:
    What does This is fine meme mean?

    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 262: Based on a webcomic of an anthropomorphic dog sitting in a burning house saying “This is fine,” this is fine is a meme used as a reaction image in which someone ironically says a situation is OK … and it very clearly isn’t.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 264: The This is fine meme comes from a webcomic called Gunshow, by KC Green. In the first two panels of strip 648, a character known as Question Hound sits in a burning house, sipping coffee and saying, “This is fine.” As he continues to reassure himself over the course of the six-panel comic, he also begins to melt due to the heat. The particular comic strip was published on January 9, 2013 (i.e soon a decade ago) and is alternatively titled “Global warming.” The alternative text on the image says, “The pills are working,” which is used as its title, as well.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 278: Born in Kating (Jiading), now a suburb of Shanghai, in 1888. Koo grew up in an upper-class cosmopolitan family and was fluent in both English and French, which greatly aided his diplomatic career.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 280: While at the college, Koo once rode a bicycle down the streets of Shanghai into the International Settlement and followed an English boy also riding a bicycle onto the sidewalk, where an Indian policeman allowed the English boy to continue while stopping Koo to give him a fine for riding his bicycle on the sidewalk. Koo was shocked to discover that owing to extraterritoriality, the laws and rules that applied to Chinese in China did not apply to British subjects-in this instance laws prohibiting riding a bicycle on the sidewalk - and that a foreign policeman had power over the Chinese police. Koo was left with a lifelong desire to end the status of extraterritoriality that had been imposed by the 19th century "unequal treaties".
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 284: In addition, he was a big waver of pork sword on the side. In 1908, (20vee) Koo married his first wife, Chang Jun-o .They divorced prior to 1912. Koo's second wife, Tang Pao-yueh "May" (唐寶玥; 唐宝玥; Táng Bǎoyuè; c. 1895–1918), was the youngest daughter of the former Chinese prime minister Tang Shaoyi and a first cousin of the painter and actress Mai-Mai Sze. Their marriage took place soon after Koo's return to China in 1912 (24vee). She died in the US during the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic. Result: 2 kids.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 288: On September 3, 1959, Koo (61vee) married his fourth wife Yen Yu-yun (1905–2017), the widow of Clarence Kuangson Young. He had three stepdaughters from this marriage, but none that he would have fucked in himself.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 293: The French Premier Georges Clemenceau (se sadetakkinen paxulainen jossain Pariisin aukiolla) praised Koo for his eloquent speech. The American secretary of state, Robert Lansing, wrote that Koo had crushed the Japanese with his speech. The Canadian prime minister, Sir Robert Borden, called Koo's speech "very able".
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 296: In 1921, Koo became the Chinese minister to Britain. Much to his displeasure, Punch published a ballad that implied he was not so much a diplomat representing China but rather just a foreigner with a funny name to amuse the British. This greatly offended him.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 298: In October 1921, Koo was reassigned as the Chinese minister in Washington. Koo was to represent China at the Washington conference, hence his sudden reassignment to Washington just after his arrival in London.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 300: The Washington conference proved to be Koo's triumph as the conference ended with Japan renouncing its claims to the Shandong and the attending powers all signing the Nine-Power Treaty affirming the independence of China. After the conference, Koo changed his name to Washington Koo and returned to China a national hero.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 314: Owning to the shortage of food in occupied France, Koo's wife observed that he was forced to eat canned food for the first in his entire life.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 315: Afterwards, he was the Chinese Ambassador to the Court of St James's until 1946. Koo decided that wartime London was too dangerous for his family to live, and sent his wife and children to New York. Madame Koo had wanted to go to London and went to New York most unwillingly.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 322: On 11 January 1943, Koo signed in London a new Sino-British treaty that saw Britain renounce all of its extraterritorial rights in China, through the British refused to return Hong Kong as the Chinese had wanted. Through Koo failed to secure the return of Hong Kong, he called the new Sino-British treaty in his diary "a really an epoch-making event-the biggest treaty in a century". Kiitos vaan japsut ja sakemannit vetoavusta!
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 324: In 1943, Madame Koo and her children finally arrived in London, but this time a rift had developed in the marriage as Koo was most unhappy with the ghost-written autobiography that his wife had just published prior to leaving New York.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 328: Koo retired from the Chinese diplomatic service in 1956 and in the same year he became a judge of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, and served as Vice-President of the Court during the final three years of his term. In 1967, he retired and moved to New York City, where he lived until his death in 1985. Vittu täähän kumppari kiskoi 3v vaille sentenaarixi!
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 330: Despite this, both his third and fourth wife lived even longer than he did: Oei Hui-lan died at the age 103 and Juliana Koo died at the age of 111.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 341: In October 2021, NBC sports reporter Kelli Stavast was interviewing racing driver Brandon Brown, the winner of the Sparks 300 race at the Talladega Superspeedway, on his win. In the background of the interview were chants of “Fuck Joe Biden” from the crowd – which Stavast mistook for chants of “Let’s Go Brandon,” and reported it live on-air as such. The use of “dark” in referring to political candidates actually first came from supporters of Donald Trump in March of this year. Supporters coined the phrase and Twitter hashtag #DarkMAGA – a reference to the Make America Great Again slogan – to represent a Trump running for president in 2024 who abandoned all political norms.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 343: But slowly, some "pro-Dark Biden" memes began to emerge – particularly in the wake of the death of Ayman al-Zawahiri, the man who took over as leader of al-Qaida after Osama Bin Laden's death, who was killed in a targeted strike ordered by the Biden administration over the summer. White House digital director Rob Flaherty shared an image of Biden with red lasers shooting out of his eyes as a way to express support for the president’s murderous success.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 372: Amurin alueen Mazanovon ja Sokhatinon kylissä nostettiin kapina vastauksena japanilaisten sortotoimiin, 11. tammikuuta 1919 japanilainen rangaistusosasto ampui komentajansa kapteeni Maedan käskystä enemmän kuin 300 näiden kylien asukasta, mukaan lukien naiset ja lapset, ja itse kylät poltettiin maan tasalle. Japanin keisarillisen armeijan pääesikunnan julkaisussa "Siperian retkikunnan historia 1917-1922" sanottiin puolueettomasti: "... rangaistuksena näiden kylien asukkaiden, jotka ylläpitivät yhteyxiä bolshevikeihin, talot poltettiin."
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 401: Ymmärryksessä korkeamman komennon kanssa japanilainen varuskunta päätti tehdä yllätyshyökkäyxen. Japanilaiset avasivat yöllä 11.–12. maaliskuuta äkillisesti tulen Tryapitsynin päämajaan ja ampuivat myös raketteja häntä kohti. Merkittävä osa Nikolaevskista sytytettiin tuleen. Hyökkäykseen osallistui japanilaisen varuskunnan lisäksi koko taisteluvalmius kaupungin japanilaisen väestön miehistä.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 459: By 1903 he was encountering opposition from the Colonial Office, which felt he was proceeding too rapidly. In 1904, after being criticized for granting a concession on land previously reserved for the indigenous Maasai people, he resigned his position. Following his resignation, he served as vice chancellor of both the University of Sheffield (1905–12) and the University of Hong Kong (1912–18). His last diplomatic post was as the British ambassador to Japan, which he began in 1920. He retired in 1926, continuing to live in Japan. During his life he wrote several papers and books, including The East Africa Protectorate (1905) and Letters from the Far East (1907).
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 476: Weighing over 500 tons and measuring an impressive 15 meters (49 feet) tall, Todai-ji Temple's Great Buddha absolutely dwarfs his admirers. He pitifully tries to hang on to the title of the largest bronze Buddha in the world (but see Ushiku daibutsu below).
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 501: Fo Guan Shan Monastery is the biggest Buddhist monastery in Taiwan. It's the headquarters of a new religious movement, founded in 1967, that promotes a new form of Humanistic Buddhism.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 537: The Ushiku Daibutsu is located near the city of Tsukuba in the Ibaraki Prefecture of Japan. This bronze Buddha statue held the Guinness World Record for being the tallest Buddha statue in the world from 1993 to 2008.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 542: The Spring Temple Buddha (Chinese: 中原大佛 and simplified Chinese: 鲁山大佛; traditional Chinese: 魯山大佛) is a colossal statue depicting Vairocana Buddha located in the Zhaocun township of Lushan County, Henan, China, built from 1997 to 2008. It is located within the Fodushan Scenic Area, close to National Freeway no. 311. At 128 metres (420 ft), excluding a 25 metres (82 ft) lotus throne. It is the second-tallest statue in the world after the Statue of Unity (representing no longer the Buddha but this guy named Patel) in Gujarat, India, which surpassed it in 2018 with a height of 182 metres (597 ft).
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 549: Vallabhbhai Javerabhai Patel was born on 31 October, 1875 in Nadiad, Bombay Presidency, British India, is an Actor. Discover Vallabhbhai Patel's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is He in this year and how He spends money? Also learn how He earned most of Vallabhbhai Patel networth? At 75 years old, Vallabhbhai Patel height not available right now. We will update Vallabhbhai Patel's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible. He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children. His net worth has been growing significantly in 2020-2021. So, how much is Vallabhbhai Patel worth at the age of 75 years old? Vallabhbhai Patel’s income source is mostly from being a successful Actor. He is from British India. We have estimated Vallabhbhai Patel's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets at $0 according to our database.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 551: Known as the "Iron Man of India", Vallabhbhai Patel was born in Gujarat. He was the fourth of the six children of his father, Jhaveribhai. The first 3 got gold, silver and bronze. Patel is credited for being almost single-handedly responsible for unifying India on the eve of independence. He completed his matriculation at the age of 22 due to the poor financial condition of family. Patel had a desire to study to become a lawyer. So he started to work and save funds. He went to England to study law. He passed examinations within two years and travelled back to India. Patel started practicing as a barrister in Ahmadabad. In 1917, Patel got elected as the sanitation commissioner of Ahmadabad. He displayed extraordinary devotion to duty and personal courage in fighting an outbreak of plague and led a successful agitation for the removal of an unpopular British municipal commissioner. Inspired by the words of Gandhi, Patel started active participation in the Indian independence movement. So apparently he's not the world's largest guy in bronze, but a man of steel.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 585: On average, the vagina is 3 to 4 inches deep during un-arousal periods, although some women have a vagina that is around 5 to 7 inches deep. As a woman becomes aroused, the vagina expands: as blood flows to the area, the cervix and uterus are pushed up by the upper two-thirds of the vagina to create more space. This expansion helps to accommodate the penis and ease intercourse. The vagina will also become more lubricated when having sex, which helps to further ease penetration.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 586: While the vagina will most commonly expand during periods of arousal, it is possible that the penis can't fit properly inside, which can make woman feel much pain and discomfort. This could be due to exceptionally large penis size, thrusting too hard or the women is not sufficiently aroused (meaning the cervix and uterus have not been pushed up to let the vagina expand). So wait a minute jap, not so fast, there will more than enough space for your half-foot in a few moments!
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 599: Motoori Norinaga (jap. 本居宣長; 1730–1801) oli japanilainen Kokugaku-koulukunnan huomattava oppinut, joka vaikutti Edo-kaudella. Hänen mukaansa japanilaiset klassikot paljastivat Japanin yhteiskunnan muinaisen harmonian, jossa kungfutselaista etiikkaa ei vaadittu säätelemään alamaisten, hallitsijan ja jumaluuksien välisiä suhteita. Nuorena Motoori keskittyi pyllykielitieteeseen. Myöhemmällä iällä hän siirtyi historian ja kirjallisuuden tutkimukseen. Siis ihan niinkuin tämä paasaaja!
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 601: Kojiki (jap. 古事記, suom. Vanhojen asioiden kronikka) on yksi vanhimmista säilyneistä japanilaisista kirjoista ja vanhin tunnettu japanilainen historiateos. Se on valmistunut vuonna 712 ja siinä kerrotaan Japanin historia maailman luomisesta keisarinna Suikon hallituskauteen 600-luvun alussa. Moottoriturpa julkaisi 44-osaisen tutkimuksen Kojikista nimeltä Kojiki-den. Runot sillä oli lyhyempiä, kuten tämä Kustun suomentama:
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 618: While the cherry blossom is the flower that most people associate with Japan, the chrysanthemum, or kikuli, is more intrinsically linked to the country’s culture and history. Enid Blytonin Fabulous Fiven Dick on nimetty uudelleen Prickixi, koska Dick on nyttemmin yxinomaan kikuli.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 620: Influenced by Chinese custom (no tietysti), the Heian court (794–1185) took to Chrysanthemum the Imperial Blossomdrinking chrysanthemum wine and using chrysanthemum dew as a kind of body lotion. All of this is recounted in The Pillow Book, a collection of observations by the court lady "Sei silmiä" Shonagon. The Chrysanthemum Festival is the last of Japan’s five annual festivals, which includes Boys’ Day in May and Tanabata in July.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 638: A renowned poet in history, Tao Yuanming (365-427) wrote a poem about how he tried to live as a hermit.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 643: Tao wrote in his poem, depicting how he loved the flower. Since then, the chrysanthemum has been regarded as the symbol of the hermit.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 645: The chrysanthemum blooms in bright colors during chilly autumn, a time when most flowers wither. Facing coldness and a tough environment, it blooms splendidly without attempting to compete with other flowers – this unique aspect of the chrysanthemum makes it a symbol of strong vitality and tenacity in the eyes of scholars.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 666: Three laughs at Tiger Brook (Chinese: 虎溪三笑; Pinyin: hǔ xī sān xiào; Gan: fû ki sam siēu) is a Chinese proverb which refers to the image that the three men, Huiyuan, Tao Yuanming and Lu Xiujing laugh together when arriving at Huxi (虎溪, Tiger Brook) of Mount Lu (Lushan).This concept represents the ideal humorous relations of Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism in ancient China.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 668: Tao Yuanming had five sons. The daughters, if any, were unrecorded (as customary). Approximately 130 of his works survive, consisting mostly of poems or essays which depict an idyllic pastoral life of farming and drinking. Some farming and a lot of boozing. Poem number five of Tao's "Drinking Wine" series translated:
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 705: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official editorial position of UCA News, which all in favor of fucking energetically pre-menarchal girls.
    xxx/ellauri230.html on line 732: Keltaiseen mereen ja keltaiseen jokeen oli liuennut hedelmällistä lössiä. Esim. englantilainen rouva kauhistui ja pyörtyi: pienen matkan päässä lipui kaatuneeen kiinalaisen sotilaan ruumis hiljalleen virran mukana. Turvonneena ja pöhöttyneenä se siinä kellui. Mies oli kaatunut jokeen varmaan yläjuoxun puolella. Pian alkoi virran mukana solua matkansa päättäneitä enemmänkin. Niitä tuli toisinaan ryhminäkin pöhöttynein jäsenin. No joo.
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 33:

    Töhnä-kerhon jälkeenjääneet paperit

    Sotahistoriaa


    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 39: Viime vuosisadan alussa, etenkin suursodan aikana ja iloisella 20-luvulla Siperian ja Ukrainan huudeila oli aika lailla samat fiilixet kuin nyt sata vuotta myöhemmin. Senaikaisia historiikkeja lukee sixi ihan iloxeen. Mutta hetkinen, kazotaan ensin tämä tilanne:
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 55: Alla on joitain tärkeimmistä historiallisista tapahtumista, jotka tapahtuivat 21. lokakuuta hiljakkoin.
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 150: Poliittisesti naiivi ja kykenemätön hallintovirkailija Koltshak kuvaili itseään "tappokoneexi", joka ei tiennyt politiikasta mitään, kuvaili valtaa "ristiksi" ja kirjoitti kirjeessään vaimolleen "korkeimman vallan pelottavasta taakasta" ja myönsi, että "taistelijana hän ei halunnut kohdata valtiovallan ongelmia". Amerikkalainen historioitsija Richard Pipes kirjoitti, että Koltshakin ainoat vahvuudet olivat hänen rohkeutensa, isänmaallisuutensa, rehellisyytensä ja vahvan kunniantuntonsa, ja kirjoitti, että hän oli "... monella tapaa Wrangelin kanssa, maan kunniallisin valkoinen komentaja. sisällissodassa", mutta hänen heikkoutensa, kuten hänen taipumuxensa kärsiä maanisesta masennuksesta ja kyvyttömyys "ymmärtää ihmisiä tai kommunikoida heidän kanssaan", teki hänestä "harhaanjohtavan järjestelmänvalvojan, jonka nimissä tehtiin anteeksiantamattomia korruptio- ja raakoja tekoja, joita hän henkilökohtaisesti piti täysin, no joxeenkin, vastenmielisinä".
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 207: Brittiläinen historioitsija Edward Hallett Carr kirjoitti:
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 249: Nestor Ivanovytš Mahno (ukr. Нестор Іванович Махно, ven. Нестор Иванович Махно, Nestor Ivanovitš Mahno; 7. marraskuuta (J: 27. lokakuuta) 1889 Huljaipole – 25. heinäkuuta 1934 Pariisi) oli ukrainalainen anarkokommunisti, joka johti Venäjän sisällissodassa niin sanottua anarkistista mustaa armeijaa. Orjan poika Nestori innostui vähän liiankin suuresti vallankumouspuuhista. Muut narkistiryhmän jäsenet epäilivät Mahnoa alun perinkin, koska hänellä oli ilmeinen taipumus juomiseen ja rähinöintiin.
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 264: Möhnäläiset listivät myös sankoin joukoin mennoniitteja. Floyd Pattersonin tutkimus on osoittanut. että hyökkäykset johtuivat syntyperäisten ukrainalaisten ja mennoniittien siirtolaisten välisestä syvästä kaunasta. Eikös se David "Sikiö" Wallacekin ruvennut jossain vaiheessa mennoniitaxi? Joo: Although his parents were atheists, Wallace twice attempted to join the Catholic Church, but "flunked the period of inquiry". He later attended a Mennonite church. Näistä lisää myös albumissa 339.
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 274: Mahno ei kyennyt vetäytymään rintamalta ja hoitamaan vammojaan, koska hänen sotniansa joutui toistuvasti puna-armeijan hyökkäyksen kohteeksi. Erään kihlauksen aikana useat mahnovistit uhrasivat itsensä varmistaakseen Mahnon paon. Toukokuun loppupuolella Mahno yritti järjestää laajamittaisen hyökkäyksen Ukrainan bolshevikkien pääkaupungin Harkovin valloittamiseksi, kokoaen yhteen tuhansia partisaaneja ennen kuin hänen oli pakko peruuttaa se kattavan punaisen puolustuksen vuoksi. Puna-armeijan komento päätti keskittää voimansa Mahnon pieneen 200 miehisen sotniaan, lähettämällä moottoroidun yksikön seuraamaan heitä. Kun se saapui, Mahno johti yhden panssaroidun auton väijytykseen, otti sen itselleen ja ajoi sitä, kunnes siitä loppui polttoaine. Myöhempi Mahnon takaa-ajo kesti viisi päivää ja kulki 520 kilometriä, mikä aiheutti hänen sotnialleen suuria tappioita ja melkein loppui ammuksista, ennen kuin he vihdoin pystyivät pudottamaan panssaroitujen joukon pois jäljestään.
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 282: Koska Romania jahnasi edelleen luovuttamisvaatimuksista, Mahno päätti tehdä loikkaset Puolan puoleen. Häntä jäi kiinni rajalla ja kuljetettiin puolalaiselle Strzałkowo nimiselle keskitysleirille huhtikuussa. Mahno yritti myöhemmin saada luvan siirtyä Tšekkoslovakiaan tai Saksaan, mutta Puolan hallitus kieltäytyi. Bolshevikkihallitus lähetti agenttiprovokaattorin vangitsemaan Mahnon ja pakottamaan luovuttamaan hänet sotkemalla hänet suunnitelmaan kapinan käynnistämiseksi Galiciassa. Puolan viranomaiset syyttivät tästä Mahnoa ja hänen vaimoaan virallisesti, ja he olivat yli vuoden alatutkimusvankeudessa, jossa Halyna synnytti heidän tyttärensä lokakuussa. Vankilassa Mahno laati ensimmäisen muistelmakirjansa, jonka Peter Ustinov julkaisi vuonna 1923 berliiniläisessä sanomalehdessään Anarchist Messenger. Mahno lähetti myös kuvapostikortteja maanpaossa oleville Don-kasakoille ja Ukrainan kommunistiselle puolueelle ja alkoi oppia saksaa ja esuperantoa. Hänen tuberkuloosinsa uusiutui vankilan olosuhteissa. 
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 308: Mahno on paikallinen sankari kotikaupungissaan Huliaipolessa, jonka pääaukiolla on Pappa-Tuhnun patsas. Huliaipolen paikallishistoriallisessa museossa on pysyvä Mahnolle omistettu näyttely. 2010-luvun lopulla Huliaipolen kaupunginvaltuusto valmistautui pyytämään Mahnon tuhkan palauttamista Ranskasta osana kampanjaa turistien houkuttelemiseksi kaupunkiin ja julisti Mahnon osaksi kaupungin brändiä. Neuvostoliiton hajoamisen jälkeen osa Ukrainan äärioikeistosta on myös yrittänyt saada Mahnon takaisin ukrainalaiseksi nationalistiksi ja vähätellä hänen anarkistista politiikkaansa.
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 376: Stateless domicile: France. Onko Ivan emigrantti vaiko loikkari? Ivan Bunin syntyi maanomistajien perheeseen Vorónezhissa Länsi-Venäjällä ja vietti lapsuutensa maassa perheen kartanoilla (huomaa monikko). Hänen äitinsä Lyudmila Alexandrovna esitteli hänet venäläiseen kansanperinteeseen, ja hän alkoi kirjoittaa runoutta ja proosaa varhaisessa iässä. Hän matkusti ympäri Venäjää, Etelä-Eurooppaa, Pohjois-Afrikkaa, Lähi-itää ja Balkania. Vuonna 1909 hänet valittiin zaari-Venäjän tiedeakatemian jäseneksi. Bolshevikkihallinnon takia hän lähti Venäjältä vuonna 1920 ja asui loppuelämänsä Ranskassa. Kyllä se sitten oli loikkari, sillä lokakuun vallankumous (25.10. vanhaa laskua) oli tapahtunut jo 3 vuotta aiemmin.
    xxx/ellauri231.html on line 404: Vaikka Bunin vihasi bolshevismia, hän ei koskaan kannattanut ajatusta ulkomaisesta interventiosta Venäjälle, toisin kuin myöhäisempi ja vielä iiliäisempi aateveljensä Mihail Shishkin. "Tavallisen venäläisen maanmiehen on ratkaistava ongelmansa itse, ei ulkomaalaisten mestareiden tulee tulla ylläpitämään uutta järjestystä kotonamme. Kuolen mieluummin maanpaossa kuin palaan kotiin Puolan tai Englannin avulla. isä opetti minulle: 'Rakasta omaa kylpyammettasi, vaikka se olisi rikki".
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 92: The far Right is moving forward all over the globe: in Putin’s Russia, in the sectarian conflicts of the Middle East, dramatically in India, visible in the success of the BJP (witness the 182-meter statue of Patel!). This occurs as the need for a planned and democratically controlled economy is more pressing than ever, as we face accelerating climate change, and shifting attitudes to nationality, as more and more people across the world are forced to move. Socialism – far beyond the clichés of economism – is needed more urgently than ever.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 94: Meanwhile, optimistic neoliberal positions wonder how could this happen, if the world is richer than ever, and more and more people have been dragged from poverty. That statistics is no longer even true, and largely overlooks that the poorest classes in developed countries have seen none of this improvement, and that redistribution mechanisms in these countries have been severely diminished by decades of neoliberal policies. The picture below displays the real income growth of the world population, and where it has (roughly) ended up.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 99: If social claims appeal to the people's struggle with poverty and inequality, nationalism offers an encompassing narrative, an identity that blurs the lines of social classes and hides the social fractures that created this very problem. While Fascism promises to protect workers, studies show how Workers' conditions worsened severely during fascist times, something that can also be seen in the strong ultraliberal component most of the 'new far right', and of the dubious democratic credentials of of neoliberalism, devoid of the philosophical background of political liberalism. Nationalism gives the two great enemies behind the woes of people: foreigners, and immigrants. The external enemy, the internal enemy. Both combined ensure that no one is paying attention at inequality or working and living conditions.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 106: Alf W. Johansson är professor emeritus i historia vid Södertörns högskola och en av grundarna av Respons. Han skriver:
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 117: Under mellankrigstiden och senare formulerades en uppsjö av psykologiska och sociologiska ”teorier” om fascism. Wilhelm Reich hävdade i sin Massenpsychologie des Faschismus (1933) att nyckeln till fascismen låg i det borgerliga samhällets undertryckande av sexualiteten. Varför vissa samhällen förblev oberörda förklarades inte. Vilka då? Inte britterna, men kanske det hjälpte att britter är högklassiga runkare.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 127: I större historiska arbeten som exempelvis Noltes bok och Stanley Paynes A History of Fascism 1919-1945 (1995) finns uppräkningar av element som måste ingå i en minimidefinition av fascism. Nolte nämner antimarxism, antiliberalism, antikonservatism, ledarskapsprincipen, paramilitär organisation och totalitarism. Payne lyfter fram inte mindre än tjugo faktorer som förutsättning för en framgångsrik fascistisk rörelse.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 135: I Sverigedemokraternas program sägs det att partiet sympatiserar med socialkonservatismens strävan att söka skapa ”stabilitet och gemenskap genom att förena de bästa elementen hos den traditionella högern och den traditionella vänstern”; att partiet vill ”ersätta klasskamp och hat med förbrödring och nationell solidaritet”. Det viktigaste medlet i denna strävan sägs vara ”den tidiga europeiska socialkonservatismens analys av nationalismen och stärkandet av samhörigheten på den nationella identitetens och den gemensamma kulturens och historiens grund”. Är detta fascism? Ja, menar Arnstad.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 149: De rörelser som gick under namn av fascism var alltför olika för att sammanfattas i ett begrepp. Den tyske historikern Wolfgang Wipperman har gjort ett försök till tredelning av begreppet. Han talar om den italienska ”normalfascismen”, den tyska ”radikalfascismen” och slutligen den östeuropeiska fascismen. En sådan realtypisk tredelning av fascismbegreppet har en empirisk konkretion och ger en bättre utgångspunkt för forskningen än Griffins tandlösa definition.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 151: Den tyske historikern Wolfgang Wipperman har gjort ett försök till tredelning av begreppet. Han talar om den italienska ”normalfascismen”, den tyska ”radikalfascismen” och slutligen den östeuropeiska fascismen. En sådan realtypisk tredelning av fascismbegreppet har en empirisk konkretion och ger en bättre utgångspunkt för forskningen än Griffins tandlösa definition.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 157: Den Mitgliedern des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU) warf er angesichts ihres Hauptgutachtens Welt im Wandel – Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation 2011 vor, sie seien Utopisten, die eine Klimadiktatur in größerem Rahmen vorschlügen, und dies nicht aus Gedankenlosigkeit. Dies erinnere ihn an die faschistische oder kommunistische Internationale. Es handle sich um naturwissenschaftliche Fanatiker, die ihre Vorstellungen durchsetzen wollen.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 173: Nahezu alle Fachhistoriker, die auf diesem Gebiet arbeiten, lehnten die Thesen und Methoden Goldhagens ab. Mit dem Buch würden „tiefere emotive Schichten angesprochen“, die „nicht mit dem Bedürfnis nach rationaler Aufklärung“ in Verbindung stünden. Im Falle der USA spiegele die Begeisterung für Goldhagen antideutsche Ressentiments wider, wie man sie aus trivialen Filmen über den Zweiten Weltkrieg kenne.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 178: Berger: Det är omöjligt att tänka sig historieskrivning som inte har normativa inslag, vilket gör att det alltid finns en politisk dimension även om det inte rör sig om partier. Politik är en oundviklig del av historieskrivningen som vi måste vara medvetna om.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 195: När utredningen kommit så långt i sitt arbete att återstoden av arbetsinsatsen mest skulle handla om att slutföra de planerade forskarvolymerna slog en bomb ner i medierna. I en debattartikel (DN 2003-04-06) meddelade två av expertgruppens medlemmar – ekonomhistorikern Paulina de los Reyes och sociologen Masoud Kamali – att de hoppade av arbetet i utredningen. Som skäl angavs följande: ”Utredarens arbetssätt och utredningens perspektiv, fokus och prestationer hittills gör dock att vi i dag inte längre ser det som meningsfullt att sitta kvar i expertgruppen.” Av artikeln framgick att författarna ansåg att forskare med invandrarbakgrund var underrepresenterade i utredningen, att dessa inte släppts fram för att få vara redaktörer för forskarvolymerna och att valet av utredare – Anders Westholm – ansågs ”väcka många frågor”.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 240: Rukousrukous, ne rukouksen osat, kun pyydämme asioita, on keskeinen rooli juutalaisuudessa. Amidahissa, juutalaisen rukouksen keskipisteessä, 19 siunauksesta 13 on pyyntöjä.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 259: Rukousrukous voi olla motivaatiokone. Kiinnittämällä huomiota kaikkiin Amidahissa esittämiimme pyyntöihin ymmärrämme nopeasti, että maailma sellaisena kuin sen tunnemme, ei ole ihanteellinen. Seurauksena on, että sanomme itsellemme, että tämä ei ole maailma, sellaisena kuin haluaisin sen olevan.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 280: Kramsun vanhemmat olivat merimies, talonomistaja (on siinäkin duuni) Antti Kramsu ja Brita Liisa Anglén. Tultuaan ylioppilaaksi 1874 hän opiskeli Helsingin yliopistossa filosofiaa, historiaa ja suomen kieltä kuitenkaan valmistumatta. (Tää tuntuu olevan yxi runoilijoiden kompastuskivi.) Kramsu oli toimittajana useissa lehdissä eri paikkakunnilla, Oulun Wiikko-Sanomissa hän oli 1879, Oulun Lehdessä 1880–1881, turkulaisessa Aurassa 1885–1886, Rauman Lehdessä 1886–1889 ja porilaisessa Satakunnassa 1890–1891. Hän toimi myös Rauman kaupunginvaltuuston sihteerinä ja opettajana.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 284: Kramsu muistetaan isänmaallisista balladeistaan ja lohduttomista tunnelmarunoistaan, jotka heijastelevat tekijänsä yksinäistä ja levotonta elämää. Hänen laajin nuijasota-aiheinen runonsa on balladi Hannu Krankasta. V. A. Koskenniemi pitää Kramsun Ilkka -runoa kuuluisimpana historiallisena balladinamme. Runoilijan päälähteenä on ollut Yrjö-Koskisen Nuijasota-teos.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 286: Toinen juoppo Eino Leino, jonka veli Kasimir oli kuppanen, kirjoitti Kramsun runoudesta teoksessaan Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden historia seuraavasti:
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 288: "Kaarlo Kramsun runotar on synkkäpukuinen, traagillinen impi, jonka kasvoilla syvä ja totinen elämäntuska kuvastuu. Hän on kansallisuusaatteesta innostunut, mutta sekään ei tuota hänelle täyttä lohdutusta. Hän näkee senkin traagillisessa valaistuksessa. Hän näkee historiallisen ristiriidan herran ja talonpojan, samoin yleisinhimillisen ristiriidan pikkusielujen ja suurten johtajien välillä. Hänen oma tunne-elämänsä on karu, miehekäs ja yksinkertainen. Hänen sielullinen yksinäisyytensä on ääretön ja siksi seisoo hän niin yksin myös Suomen kirjallisuudessa."
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 322: A shochet is a ritual slaughterer who skillfully practices shechitah, slitting the throat of the animal as per Torah tradition. He does so using a chalef, a perfectly sharp and smooth knife with which he can swiftly and cleanly cut through the trachea and esophagus in an uninterrupted sweeping motion. Before beginning his work, the shochet says the traditional blessing, “Blessed are you … Who has commanded us regarding shechitah [slaughter].”
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 324: A shochet must be learned in the laws of kosher slaughter and adept at sharpening and polishing his knives, known as shtellen ah chalef in Yiddish. He also trains under an experienced shochet to learn how to hold the animal firmly, to slaughter it quickly and smoothly.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 328: After a rabbi examines a shochet’s knife and is satisfied with his skill and knowledge, he issues him a certificate of kabbalah, attesting to his worthiness.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 338: I am new to the concept of Sabbath, and relatively ignorant of Jewish terminology, so please don’t be offended by my ignorance. But I am trying to reconcile the activity done by a rabbi at synagogue on the Sabbath with the concepts of labor and rest. It seems to me that the acts of organizing and conducting a worship/prayer gathering takes quite a bit of work. Is this an exemption to the command to “keep the Sabbath”, or would there be another day of Sabbath for the local rabbi or…what?
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 346: You are correct that paid work is not permitted on Shabbat and major Jewish holidays, and no one – not even the cantor and the rabbi – is exempt from the laws of Shabbat. There are also jobs which do not include forbidden activities, such as babysitting, waiting tables, or house-sitting. This covers most of what the rabbi does, except writing.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 348: The main problem with jobs in this second category is that one may end up writing (which is not permitted on Shabbat) to keep an accurate log of money owed. To prevent this, work for pay on Shabbat is forbidden, even if the work itself is technically permissible.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 350: Nevertheless, a person can be paid a general sum for several days’ work, including Shabbat. For example, the rabbi is paid a set monthly salary which includes his Shabbat duties. Similarly, a babysitter who works during the week, and also on Shabbat, should be paid a set fee for the week. The same with a cantor.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 356: I love the Shabbat experience (especially the candle lighting and the kiddush), but why so many restrictions? No driving, no shopping, no playing music, no chatting on the phone — you're not even allowed to check your e-mail! Sounds more like a prison than a day of rest. Why not just focus on the beautiful rituals and the restful atmosphere? I'd love to start keeping Shabbat, but all that "don't do this" and "don't do that" is a real turn-off...
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 360: To experience Shabbat rest, we need to cease work — that is, cease all creative involvement with our world. Plowing a field, for example, constitutes creative involvement with the world. Converting matter into energy (which is what we do every time we press down on the gas pedal or turn on an electrical appliance) constitutes creative involvement with the world. If you're creatively involving, you're not resting. This may sound to you like pilpul, which it admittedly is.
    xxx/ellauri232.html on line 362: The problem ultimately is this: If you work while others rest you get ahead of the others while they rest, and they have to work too to come up even, so the only way for anyone to get some rest is for everyone to rest at once and for everyone to keep a close eye on the others to make sure nobody cheats.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 63: Kaksi iäkästä miestä (miten iäkästä?), automekaanikko Carter Chambers ja miljardööri (onko se muka joku ammatti? No Amerikassa on) Edward Cole tapaavat ensimmäisen kerran Edwardin omistamassa sairaalassa sen jälkeen, kun molemmilla miehillä on diagnosoitu terminaalinen keuhkosyöpä. Carter, neekeri mutta siitä huolimatta lahjakas amatöörihistorioitsija ja perheenisä, halusi nuoruudessaan historian professoriksi, mutta "päätti sen sijaan perustaa perheen" eli siltä paloi pohjaan. Edward, neljä kertaa eronnut terveydenhuollon tycoon ja sivistynyt yksinäinen (takuulla homopetteri), nauttii kopi luwakin, yhden maailman kalleimmista kahveista, juomisesta ja kiusaa henkilökohtaista "palvelijaansa" katamiitti Matthew'ta, jota hän virheellisesti, mutta tarkoituksella kutsuu Thomasiksi.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 162: The rise of modern, centralized states in Europe by the early 19th century heralded the end of Jewish judicial autonomy and social seclusion. Their communal corporate rights were abolished, and the process of emancipation and acculturation that followed quickly transformed the values and norms of the public. Estrangement and apathy toward Judaism were rampant. The process of communal, educational and civil reform could not be restricted from affecting the core tenets of the faith. The new academic, critical study of Judaism (Wissenschaft des Judentums) soon became a source of controversy. Rabbis and scholars argued to what degree, if at all, its findings could be used to determine present conduct. The modernized Orthodox in Germany, like rabbis Isaac Bernays and Azriel Hildesheimer, were content to cautiously study it while stringently adhering to the sanctity of holy texts and refusing to grant Wissenschaft any say in religious matters. On the other extreme were Rabbi Abraham Geiger, who would emerge as the founding father of Reform Judaism, and his supporters. They opposed any limit on critical research or its practical application, laying more weight on the need for change than on continuity.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 169: Harry Kemelmannin Rabbi Small on alkupuolella kirjaa suht kiinnostava, ei siis läheskään niin ärsyttävä kuin valtaosa whoduniteista. Rabbi Small on kuivakka eikä hötkyile turhasta, ei edes kun nilkki Schwarz koittaa sitä höykyttää. Mutta on se aika izetyytyväinen mokkeri. "Muut kehuskelee kauniilla naisilla, me pojat vanhoilla miehillä". Hyi. Ja ezen tautta muka jutkut ei ole usein spugeja. Ja hah. Noohahan se retkotti munasilteen sikakännissä ja kosti vielä viattomille pojilleen. Sen mielestä jutkut eivät ryyppää koska niillä ei ole syyllisyydentunteita. Koska niillä ei ole turhanaikaista taivastoivoa. Tää on nyt tässä, ja sen jälkeen ollaan kiven alla luukasana. Fair enough. Mutta on niillä kaikenlaista ihan paskaa mukana, kuten että naisen joka joutuu raiskattavaxi pitää tehdä seppuku mieluummin kuin päästää mekkoon väärän miehen melaa. Mitä vittua, kyllä sinne mahtuu useampi keppi likoon (ainaskin vuoron perään) ilman että tulee tehdyxi suurta vahinkoa. Mieluummin sopii kyseiseltä ushshelilta vääntää irti shishsheli.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 228: Look inside this book! Michael Dahlen: Ending Big Government: The Essential Case for Capitalism and Freedom. 4.7 out of 5 stars (29) Reviews. Kindle Price: $6.59.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 240: As Michael Dahlen shows in Ending Big Government: The Essential Case for Capitalism and Freedom, the only rational alternative to statists and the only antidote to the problems they cause is free-market, laissez-faire capitalism. This is the system of limited government, the system of economic and political freedom. It is a system that has created more wealth, offered more opportunity, and lifted more rich people out of the dredges of poverty than any other system.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 242: Yet it is relentlessly demonized. We are told that businessmen pay “starvation wages,” that the rich get richer while the poor get poorer, and that the free market is impractical—prone to crises, depressions, mass unemployment, and coercive monopolies. Michael Dahlen dispels these and many other myths. He shows that a system of free markets and limited government is not only practical; he shows that it is moral, as it is the only system that recognizes each egoistic individual’s inalienable right to his own lifelong earnings.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 244: A provocative cesspool of history, philosophy, and political economy, Ending Big Government shows that laissez-faire capitalism is incontestably superior to anything. Read less, believe more!
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 259: Erään jumalanpalveluksen aikana jesuiittalähteet väittivät hänen osallistuneen arktiselle tutkimusmatkalle, joka kesti noin kaksi vuotta etsiessään Koillisväylää Siperian rannikkoa pitkin Kaukoitään. Tämän väitteen todenperäisyys on hieman epäilyttävää, koska hän ei koskaan viitannut sellaiseen tutkimusmatkaan Japanista kirjoittamassaan omaelämäkerrallisessa kirjeessään; sen sanamuoto viittaa siihen, että vuoden 1598 matka oli hänen ensimmäinen seikkailunsa hollantilaisten kanssa. Jesuiittalähde saattoi liittää Adamsin väärin yhden Mahun miehistön hollantilaisen jäsenen väitteen, joka oli ollut Rijpin aluksella Huippuvuoret löytäneen matkan aikana. Sitäpaizi jesuiitat ovat pajunköyttä syöttäviä heittiöitä, joihin ei kannata luottaa pitemmälle kun ne jaxaa heittää.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 263: Elokuun lopussa ne laskeutuivat Santiagoon, Kap Verdeen ja Mayoon Afrikan rannikon edustalla veden puutteen ja tuoreiden muusikkojen tarpeen vuoksi. He viipyivät noin kolme viikkoa siinä toivossa, että he voisivat ostaa vuohia. Lähellä Praiaa he onnistuivat valloittamaan portugalilaisen linnan kukkulan laella, mutta palasivat ilman mitään merkittävää, vain vuohia. Kap Verdessä puolet "Hopen" miehistöstä sai kuumetta, ja suurin osa miehistä oli sairaita, muun muassa amiraali Jacques Mahu.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 267: Pakkasen ja huonon näkyvyyden alaisena he saivat pingviinejä, hylkeitä, simpukoita, ankkoja ja kaloja. Noin kaksisataa miehistön jäsentä kuoli. 23. elokuuta tie parani. He olivat alkaneet purjehtia ympyrää.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 280: Huhtikuussa 1600, yli 19 kuukauden merellä olon jälkeen, 23 sairaan ja kuolevan miehen miehistö (100 matkan aloittaneesta) toi "Hyväntekeväisyyden" ankkuroimaan Kyūshū -saaren edustalle Japaniin. Sen rahti oli säälittävät yxitoista kauppatavara-arkkua: karkeaa villakangasta, lasihelmiä, peilejä ja silmälaseja; ja metallityökalut ja aseet: naulat, rauta, vasarat, yhdeksäntoista pronssista tykkiä; 5000 tykinkuulaa; 500 muskettia, 300 ketjulaukkua ja kolme arkkua täynnä postitakkeja.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 282: Kun yhdeksän elossa olevaa miehistön jäsentä oli tarpeeksi vahvoja seisomaan, he saapuivat 19. huhtikuuta Bungon edustalle (nykyinen Usuki , Ōitan prefektuuri ). He tapasivat japanilaiset paikalliset ja portugalilaiset jesuiitta -lähetyssaarnaajien papit väittivät, että Adamsin laiva oli merirosvoalus ja että miehistö pitäisi teloittaa pahantekijöinä. Mikä olisikin ollut oikein ja fixua. Mutta ei.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 286: Laiva takavarikoitiin ja sairas miehistö vangittiin Osakan linnaan Edon daimyōn ja tulevan shōgunin Tokugawa Ieyasun käskystä . "Hyväntekeväisyyden" yhdeksäntoista pronssitykkiä purettiin ja Espanjan kertomusten mukaan niitä käytettiin myöhemmin ratkaisevassa Sekigaharan taistelussa 21. lokakuuta 1600.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 287: Sekigaharan taistelu (jap. 関ヶ原の戦い, Sekigahara no tatakai) oli Japanissa 21. lokakuuta vuonna 1600 käyty taistelu ja käännekohta Japanin historiassa. Taistelun voittanut Tokugawa Ieyasu perusti Tokugawa-shōgunaatin, joka oli vallassa 1800-luvun puoliväliin saakka. Taistelu merkitsi Sengoku-kauden loppua ja Edo-kauden alkua. Vaikka Tokugawalta kestikin taistelun jälkeen vielä kolme vuotta valtansa vakiinnuttamiseen Toyotomi-klaanista ja daimioista, taistelua pidetään laajalti shōgunaatin epävirallisena alkuna. Ja kaikki kiitos maahantunkeutujien luotipyssyjen! Mutta annetaanpa Aatamin ize kertoa:
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 293: Ieyasu käski miehistön purjehtimaan Liefdellä Bungosta Edoon , missä hän upposi mätänä ja korjauskelvottomana. Vuonna 1604 Tokugawa määräsi Adamsin ja hänen seuralaisensa auttamaan Mukai Shōgenia , joka oli Uraga -laivaston ylipäällikkö , rakentamaan Japanin ensimmäisen länsimaisen laivan.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 354: Mutta ei aikaakaan niin voi kauhistus: Alle viikko ennen Adamsin paluuta Ieyasu oli kuollut. Adams haastoi Cocksin ja Eatonin oikeuteen tarjotakseen yrityslahjoja uudelle hallitsijalle, Hidetadalle. Vaikka Ieyasun kuolema näyttää heikentäneen Adamsin poliittista vaikutusvaltaa, Hidetada suostui säilyttämään englantilaiset kaupankäyntioikeudet. Hän myönsi myös uuden Punainen hylje -luvan (Shuinjō) Adamsille, mikä antoi hänelle mahdollisuuden jatkaa kauppaa ulkomailla shōgunin suojeluksessa. Hänen asemansa japsuarmeijan vänrikkinä myös uusittiin.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 368: Vuonna 1635 Tokugawa Iemitsu pakotti Sakoku-ediktin Japanille sulkemaan ulkomaankaupalta; sekä Joseph että Susanna katosivat historiallisista asiakirjoista tuolloin.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 377: Missä kohen Jamesin Blackthornen seikkailut poikkeavat esikuvastansa Adamsista? No mietitään - tää on romaani, eikä pelkkä rags to riches tositarina. Ei siis riitä pelkkä (E), pitää olla paxulti myös (K) ja (F). Näyttää siinä olevan kaikenlaista nujakointia, ja aika pian on jonkin verran myös japsunaisten nussintaa (sitähän oli Aatamilla kyllä izellään). "As they spend more time together, Blackthorne comes to deeply admire both Toranaga and (specifically) Mariko, and all three secretly become lovers." Samainen Mariko (joka on sentään vaan japsulainen nainen) silputaan smithereeneixi. "However, she and Blackthorne and the other ladies of Toranaga's "court", escape into a locked room. As the ninja prepare to blow the door open Mariko stands against the door and is killed by the explosion." No jäähän Toranagalle vielä "Lady Anjin". Entäs moraali? "Blackthorne is torn between his growing affection for Mariko (who is married to a powerful, abusive, and dangerous samurai, Buntaro), his increasing loyalty to Toranaga, his household and consort, a "Willow world" courtesan named Kikuli, and his desire to return to the open seas aboard Erasmus so he can intercept the Black Ship fleet before it reaches Japan." Onpa hienoa: (E,F,K) konfliktoituvat! "There are other recurring themes of Eastern values, as opposed to Western values, masculine (patriarchal) values as opposed to human values, etc."
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 379: In Christopher Nicole's Lord of the Golden Fan, published just two years before Shōgun, in 1973, Adams is portrayed as sexually frustrated by the morals of his time and seeks freedom in the East, where he has numerous sexual encounters. The work is considered light pornography. Kuulostaa huomattavasti kiinnostavammalta, (K) puoli näyttää olevan kunnossa.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 386: Elijah ben Solomon Zalman, (Hebrew: ר' אליהו בן שלמה זלמן Rabbi Eliyahu ben Shlomo Zalman) known as the Vilna Gaon (Yiddish: דער װילנער גאון, Polish: Gaon z Wilna, Lithuanian: Vilniaus Gaonas) or Elijah of Vilna, or by his Hebrew acronym HaGra ("HaGaon Rabbenu Eliyahu": "The sage, our teacher, Elijah"; Sialiec, April 23, 1720 – Vilnius October 9, 1797), was a Talmudist, halakhist, kabbalist, tobacconist, and the foremost leader of misnagdic (anti-hasidic) Jewry of the past few centuries. He is commonly referred to in Hebrew as ha-Gaon he-Chasid mi-Vilna, "the pious hasid from Vilnius".
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 391: According to Legend he had committed the Tanakh to memory by the age of four, and aged seven he was taught Talmud by Moses Margalit, future rabbi of Kėdainiai and the author of a commentary to the Jerusalem Talmud, entitled Pnei Moshe ("The Face of Moses"). He possessed an eidetic memory, just like Stieg Larsson's heroine Lisbet. By eight, he was studying astronomy during his free time. From the age of ten he continued his studies without the aid of a teacher, and by the age of eleven he had committed the entire Talmud to memory.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 393: Through his annotations and emendations of Talmudic and other texts, he became one of the most familiar and influential figures in rabbinic study since the Middle Ages. He is considered as one of the Anachronim, and by some as one of the Rishonim. The Acharonim "the last ones" follow the Rishonim, the "first ones"—the rabbinic scholars between the 11th and the 16th century following the Geonim and preceding the Shulchan Aruch. According to many rabbis the Shulkhan Arukh is an Acharon. Some hold that Rabbi Yosef Karo's first bestseller Beit Yosef has the halakhic status of a Rishon, while his later blockbuster Shulkhan Arukh has the status of an Acharon. The publication of the Shulchan Aruch thus marks the transition from the era of Rishonim to that of Acharonim. According to the widely held view in Orthodox Judaism, the Acharonim generally cannot dispute the rulings of rabbis of previous eras unless they find support from other rabbis in previous eras. Yet the opposite view exists as well.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 395: Large groups of people, including many yeshivas, uphold the set of Jewish customs and rites (minhag), the "minhag ha-Gra", named after him, the which is also considered by many of his followers to be the prevailing Ashkenazi minhag in Jerusalem.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 397: When Hasidic Judaism became influential in his native town, the Vilna Gaon joined the "opposers" or Misnagdim, rabbis and heads of the Polish communities, to curb Hasidic influence. When Hasidic Judaism became influential in Vilna, the Vilna Gaon joined rabbis and heads of the Polish communities, to speak against Hasidic influence.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 399: The Vilna Gaon led an ascetic life, being called by some of his contemporaries "the Hasid". This term meaning "pious person", and has no relevance to the Hasidic movement. The similarity is purely accidental.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 401: The Gaon once started on a trip to the Land of Israel, but for unknown reasons did not get beyond Germany. While at Königsberg he wrote to his family a postcard.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 402: In 1781, when the Hasidim renewed their proselytizing work under the leadership of their Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi (the "Ba'al Ha'tanya", or "Rebbe Schlemiel"), the Gaon excommunicated them again, declaring them to be heretics with whom no pious Jew might intermarry. He encouraged his students to study natural sciences, and translated geometry books to Yiddish and Hebrew.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 405: According to popular myth/legend, it is claimed that the Gaon contributed to contemporary mathematics of his day, and that Cramer's rule is named after him (since his family name was Kremer). However, the rule is in fact named after the Swiss mathematician Gabriel Cramer, and there is no evidence that the Gaon was at all familiar with anything beyond basic compound interest calculation, and certainly no evidence that he made any contributions. Anyway Cramer's tule is way inferior to Gaussian elimination. Gabi ei ehkä ollut juutalainen kuitenkaan, vaikka sen isä oli Isaac. Ainakin se muistuttaa pikemminkin Liza Marklundia kuin näitä karvaturreja.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 410: Shneur Zalman of Liadi (Hebrew: שניאור זלמן מליאדי, September 4, 1745 – December 15, 1812 O.S. / 18 Elul 5505 – 24 Tevet 5573), was an influential Lithuanian Jewish rabbi and the founder and first Rebbe of Chabad, a branch of Hasidic Judaism, then based in Liadi in Grand Duchy of Lithuania and later in the Grodno Governorate of the Russian Empire. He was the author of many works, and is best known for Shulchan Aruch HaRav, Tanya, and his Siddur Torah Or compiled according to the Nusach Ari. Zalman is a Yiddish variant of Solomon and Shneur (or Shne'or) is a Yiddish composite of the two Hebrew words "shnei ohr" (שני אור "two ears"). Shneur Zalman was a prominent (and the youngest) disciple of Dov Ber of Mezeritch, the "Great Maggid", who was in turn the successor of the founder of Hasidic Judaism, Yisrael ben Eliezer, known as the Baal Shem Tov. He too displayed extraordinary talent while still a child. By the time he was eight years old, he wrote an all-inclusive commentary on the Torah based on the works of Rashi, Nahmanides and Abraham ibn Ezra.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 412: Until the age of 12, he studied under Issachar Ber in Lyubavichi (Lubavitch); he distinguished himself as a Talmudist, such that his teacher sent him back home, informing his father that the boy could continue his studies without the aid of a teacher. At the age of 12, he delivered a discourse concerning the complicated laws of Kiddush Hachodesh, to which the people of the town granted him the title "Rav". The misnagdim, on the other hand, dubbed him "Rebbe Schlemiel".
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 414: At age 15 he married Sterna Segal, the daughter of Yehuda Leib Segal, a wealthy resident of Vitebsk, and thus relieved of the excess sperm in his aching balls he was able to devote himself entirely to study.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 418: In the course of the Hasidic movement's establishment, opponents (Misnagdim) arose among the local Jewish community. Disagreements between Hasidim and their opponents were debated with knives used by butchers for shechita, slaughtering of certain mammals and birds for food according to kashrut. Kashrut (also kashruth or kashrus, כַּשְׁרוּת‎) is a set of dietary laws dealing with the foods that Jews are permitted to eat and how those foods must be prepared according to Jewish law. Food that may be consumed is deemed kosher (/ˈkoʊʃər/ in English, Yiddish: כּשר), from the Ashkenazic pronunciation (KUHsher) of the Hebrew kashér (כָּשֵׁר‎), meaning "fit" (in this context: "fit for consumption"). Oh, and the phrasing of prayers, among others. In the case of an adhesion on cattle's lungs specifically, there is debate between Ashkenazic customs and Sephardic customs.
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 423: This tradition goes back for centuries where local Muslims accept meat slaughtered by Jews as consumable; however, the custom was not universal throughout
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 432: Jewish and Muslim commentators cite studies by the Vilna Gaon and Rebbe Schlemiel that show shechita is humane and that criticism is at least partially motivated by antisemitism. A Knesset committee announced (January, 2012) that it would call on European parliaments and the European Union to put a stop to attempts to outlaw kosher slaughter. "The pretext [for this legislation] is preventing cruelty to animals or animal rights—but there is an obvious element of anti-Semitism and a badly hidden message that Jews are cruel to animals," said Committee Chair MK Danny Danon (Likud).
    xxx/ellauri233.html on line 444: As I watched this nightmare, I thought, 'This should not be happening in a civilized society.' In my diary I wrote, 'If hell exists, I am in it.'
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 151: Ennen lähtöä Riihimäeltä tiistaina 9. syyskuuta 1941 pataljoonankomentaja majuri Perm piti meille puheen. Siinä hän ilmoitti juhlallisesti, että kaikki vanhat asiat oli nyt unohdettu ja meidät katsottiin nyt moitteettomiksi kansalaisiksi. Saisimme tilaisuuden tehdä osuutemme maailman vapauttamiseksi »idän barbaarista». Leningrad - tai Pietari, kuten hän sanoi - oli aivan romahduksen partaalla. Muutaman päivän kuluessa, ehkä muutamassa tunnissa, puna-armeijan luhistuminen rintaman tällä osa-alueella olisi tosiasia. Majurin silmissä loisti suomalaissoturin fanaattinen kiihko...
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 157: Torstaiaamuna tuli perääntymiskäsky. Puna-armeijan puolijoukkue oli hyökännyt lähistöllä sijaitsevalle louhikolle ja onnistunut murtautumaan rintamalinjan läpi. Pataljoonamme maantieyhteys rintaman taakse oli katkaistu. Olimme käyttääkseni sotilaskieltä - motissa, eli siis piiritettyjä. Varapäällikkömme kapteeni Kartano, joka oli osoittanut urhoollisuutensa pysyt telemällä kranaattien kantomatkan ulkopuolella, sopivan matkan päässä eturintamasta, pyöräili meitä vastaan maantiellä suu apposen auki ja silmät kauhusta suurina.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 161: Ennen perääntymistä ja sen aikana osa Permin pataljoonan miehistä antautui venäläisille. Saatujen tietojen mukaan kyse oli noin seitsemästäkymmenestä miehestä, puolet heistä oli Pelson vankeja, loput poliittisia vankeja. He eivät halunneet taistella demokraattista maailmaa vastaan. Tilaisuuden tultua he luonnollisesti halusivat pois väkisin pakotetusta osallisuudestaan fasistien hyökkäyssodassa. Monet antautuneista kertoivat palattuaan kotimaahansa, että kohtelu ryssien vankeudessa oli ollut hyvä. Ruoka oli hyvää ja sitä oli riittävästi.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 207: Pohjois-Ruotsin suomalainen »irridenta» liittyy Suomen kansalliseen runkoon sellaisena välittömänä luonnollisena ja historiallisena jatkona kuin Posenin puolalaisalue Suur-Puolaan ja Galitsian rutenilaisalue Ukrainaan, Vähä-Venäjä Isovenäjään, kuriilit Japaniin, Falklandin saaret Argentiinaan ja Tiibet ja Taiwan muuhun Kiinaan.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 317: Mutta nyt oli tullut toinen aika. Ryssä oli joutunut tuomarinsa eteen. Sen kohtalon hetki oli koittanut. Ja nyt oli myöskin Suomella tilaisuus korjata kärsimänsä vääryydet ja panna vielä potti nokkiin, oikea aika saada ryöstetty Karjala takaisin ja antaa sen pakolaisheimolle entinen koti. Nyt koittaisi myös Aunuksen aamu ja Vienan vapaus, nyt katkottaisiin Karjalan kahleet, nyt loppuisivat Inkerin itkut ja Uralin sukulaisten vikinä. Suomen heimo tulisi kulkemaan yhteiseen onnelliseen kotiinsa Volgan mutkassa. Kuka tahtoisi jäädä pois tältä tieltä? Ei kukaan, paizi Aspelundin typerys. Tämä oli unelmien täyttymyksen aamu, tämä oli historiallisen oikeuden toteuttamisen hetki. Suomen historian loistavinta lukua kirjoitettaessa kaikki tahtovat olla mukana. Ja ennen kaikkea nuoriso, se nuoriso, joka katse avoimena, mieli herkkänä ymmärtämään sorrettujen kärsimyksiä ja uhrivalmiina astuu elämän tielle. Tietysti silloin Jaakko ja Jyrkikin ovat mukana, täysin innoin ja palavin sydämin.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 327: Ulkona näkyi käyvän kova touhu. Kaikilla oli kiire. Oli saatava järjestykseen lukemattoman monia asioita. Päähuomio tietysti kohdistettiin siihen, mitä sotaan lähtö sotakelpoisuuden kannalta vaati. Varusteet, aseet erilaiset tarvikkeet oli hoidettava asianmukaiseen kuntoon. Siinä ohessa harjoitukset, aseen käsittely ja tarkkuuttaminen veivät päivästä suurimman osan. Eikä missään tapauksessa saanut unohtaa kotiakaan. Tässä vaiheessa, vielä kotipaikkakunnalla oltaessa, olivat siteet kotiin vielä mitä kiinteimmät. Oli niin paljon järjestettävää, niin monesta seikasta huolehdittava, niin monet yksityiskohdat suunniteltava - kuten henkivakuutuxet kaiken varalta. Kaikkialla oli vakavuutta ja vakavaa suhtautumista nähtävissä, mutta samalla levollinen, iloisen tyyni ja ehdottoman selvä ote todettavissa. Nämä miehet tiesivät, mitä sota oli, mutta tiesivät myös, mistä nyt oli kysymys. Vaara ei näistä miehistä tuntunut ennakolta miltään. Vain näiden parin päivän vanha oli tuttavuus, mutta jo sen perusteella Vaara saattoi uskoa ja olla varma, että nämä miehet täyttävät tehtävänsä miehen, tai ainakin suomalaisen persun lailla. Kyllä Jaakko ja Jyrkikin, nuoret, näille miehille täysin vieraat (mutta söpöt) koulupojat, tulisivat tähän joukkoon sopeutumaan.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 466: If I knew that he would develop like this, I would not have had him. I would not want to bring a person into this world outside of my own volition, if I knew that he would experience no joy in his existence.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 471: Sorry, son. I don’t know what to do. I am a software developer 2000-present. My name is "Jack Claxton". In 1995 when I begat my son I had other low-paying dead-end jobs. Now *that* is really sad. I understand my son's disappointment in his dad.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 475: This really hits home for me. I am exactly 27 years old, I work two somewhat dead-end, low-paying jobs (warehouse at Floor and Decor and a DSP for the developmentally disabled). Last year, I tried to commit suicide in my car after a long period of living in my car. The car didn't survive the suicide attempt, but I did. Surprisingly, I only got a few bumps and bruises from the accident, but nothing major. I was in a psych ward for 2 weeks. After that, I had to move back in with my parents in their one bedroom apartment. I hate them for all that they put me through this past year, but I'm grateful for their conditional love. My presence in my dad's life counts for a lot, especially since he probably feels like a failure like you and me.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 481: Understandably, even I don't actually ever want to listen to me, when I talk like this. I’ve heard psychologists say to not give advice, so I won’t.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 489: One word for the wise and depressed men described in this thread: VASECTOMY. Get it! I got it. Too late tho. Highly unlikely that creating another being entirely dependent on you for 18 years is going to do much to change your mood. Don’t have kids unless parenthood is your top priority and ambition in life. Kurt Cobain was right: it’s a setup!. Plant a house. Build a tree! Take a beer! Have a cow! Watch some TV! Join Depressive Quora!
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 495: these toxic elements were removed from my life, and it really changed my experience. Mine were 55, 6 and 3 when this happened, so I really got lucky.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 496: I'm believing it works out better for me on the next go around, what with this vasectomy and all, I really do wish that for myself. And I hope my unborn children perhaps bury me someday. In a garbage bag. Harri Sirolan äiti toivoi että sen 2 poikaa seisoisi sen kuolinvuoteen vieressä kuin kynttilät. Harrin tuikku valitettavasti pääsi sammumaan ennen aikojaan.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 499: Thank you for this response, I am a female, 55 years old, without my 2 children who went in a car accident. All of my life I had to deal with women complaining about being single moms. It is really only me who is genuinely single. Plus, my own mother is toxic. I wish I wasn’t born, but I still see the beauty in this earth for software developers.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 508: Depression is terrible. I remember 27 and it sucks. I can't imagine being that age now. In this world we live in. It's no wonder he's depressed. For young people it just seems hopeless, like what's the point? They can't afford a house, family of their own, secondary education, a life except being a slave to the “grind" and having a side hustle…or 5. Just be there for him. Don't tell him to cheer up, others have it worse. None of those things help. Sometimes they just have to hit rock bottom. Sometimes it's like grieving. Like Winston Churchill said, if you are in hell, just keep shoveling.
    xxx/ellauri234.html on line 520: Good for you! My son has had been through various phases of medication (serotonine re-uptake inhibitors?) but at the moment he is self-medicating with grass. I do think that he is trying to do as well as he can, though. Sometimes he gives me a doobie from his stash, I give him beer and we watch some TV together.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 65: Mutta se ei ole hänen tarinansa loppu. Todistetun johtajan elämä ei ole hiljaista rauhan aikana. Seuraavaksi hän auttaa taistelemaan bonapartisteja vastaan, jotka aikovat murtaa Napoleonin St. Helenasta. Matkalla kotiin Englantiin hän pelastaa vaimonsa ja miehistönsä hurrikaanilta. Koko uransa ajan hän ansaitsee ritarin ja kontraamiraalin arvoarvon. Eli kronologisesti näin:
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 141: Oikeat ihmiset Horatio Hornblower -kirjoissa: Napoleon, Boy George: ‘I was abused every day for being gay in the 70s’, kapteeni Edward Pelle, amiraali William Corn Flakes, Lord St. Vincent, Britannian ulkoministeri William "markiisi Wellesley" Hague, Venäjän zaari Aleksanteri I, ministeri Anthony Drink and Be Merry, Carl Philipp Gottfried von Clausewitz, ja viimeisenä muttei vähimpänä Riian sotilaskovernööri Ivan Nikolaevich Essenistä ja monista muista hajalle pommitetuista Saxan kaupungeista, erityisesti "Commodoressa". Mitä vetoa että Iivana on pahis?
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 179: The plowman homeward plods his weary way, Kyntäjä kotiinpäin kulkee väsyneenä tiensä,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 184: Save where the beetle wheels his droning flight, Pelasta siellä, missä kovakuoriainen pyörittää kuohuvaa lentoaan,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 194: Each in his narrow cell for ever laid, Jokainen kapeassa sellissään ikuisesti makaa,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 205: Or climb his knees the envied kiss to share. Tai kiivetä hänen polvilleen kadehdittu suudelma jakaa.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 232: Perhaps in this neglected spot is laid Ehkä tässä laiminlyötyssä paikassa on asetettu
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 248: The little tyrant of his fields withstood; Hänen peltojensa pieni tyranni kesti;
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 250: Some Cromwell guiltless of his country's blood. Joku Cromwell syytön maansa vereen.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 255: And read their hist'ry in a nation's eyes, Ja lue heidän historiansa kansan silmissä,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 283: This pleasing anxious being e'er resign'd, Tämä miellyttävä ahdistunut olento luopui,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 308: Mutt'ring his wayward fancies he would rove, Mutt kuvittelee, että hän vaeltaa,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 313: Along the heath and near his fav'rite tree; Nummen varrella ja hänen suosikkipuunsa lähellä;
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 323: Here rests his head upon the lap of Earth Tässä hänen päänsä lepää maan sylissä
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 325: Fair Science frown'd not on his humble birth, Fair Science ei rypistynyt hänen vaatimattomaan syntymäänsä,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 328: Large was his bounty, and his soul sincere, Suuri oli hänen armonsa ja hänen sielunsa vilpitön,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 333: No farther seek his merits to disclose, Älä enää etsi hänen ansioitaan paljastaakseen,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 334: Or draw his frailties from their dread abode, Tai vetää hänen heikkoutensa heidän kauhuasuistaan,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 336: The bosom of his Father and his God. Hänen Isänsä ja hänen Jumalansa helma.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 343: Thomas Gray on Alexander Popen ohella yksi 1700-luvun tärkeimmistä englantilaisista runoilijoista. Samuel Johnson oli ensimmäinen monista kriitikoista, joka esitti näkemyksen, jonka mukaan Gray puhui kahdella kielellä, toisella julkisella ja toisella yksityisellä, ja että yksityinen kieli – hänen tunnetuimman ja rakastetuimman runonsa " Elegia Written in a Country Churchyard " (julkaistu vuonna 1751 nimellä Elegy Wrote in a Country Church Yard ) - kuultiin liian harvoin. William Wordsworth päätti esipuheessaan teokselle Lyrical Ballads (1798) käyttämällä Grayn Sonnettia Richard Westin kuolemasta (1775) esimerkkinä, että Grey, jota hallitsee väärä käsitys runollisesta sanasta, puhui väärällä kielellä; ja Matthew Arnold huomautti yhtä tunnetulla tuomiolla, että ikä oli väärä vakavalle runolle, että Gray oli ikänsä turmeltunut eikä kuitenkaan koskaan puhunut siitä ääneen. Tällaiset tuomiot tiivistävät Grayn vastaanoton ja runoilijan maineen tärkeimmän kriittisen historian.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 355: The release of the publication comes just over three years after her 52-year-old husband was forced to release a personal statement denying internet claims of a gay affair with his young special adviser, Christopher Myers.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 410: Oidipaalinen fantasia pelataan pastoraalisessa ympäristössä: "Sinun vihreään syliin laskettiin Luonnon kulta [Shakespeare], / Mihin aikaan, missä selkeä Avon Stray'd, / Hänelle mahtava Äiti paljasti / Hänen kauhistuttavat kasvonsa.... Paljastumisen odotus sai tirkistelijä Miltonin ratsastamaan "ylevällä / Extasyn serafin siipien päällä, / Abyssin salaisuudet vakoilemaan". Silti Joven lait säilyvät: alkuperäistä kohtausta ei koskaan katsota. Hyperionic marssi on tehty merkityksettömäksi "sellaiset muodot, kuten glitter Muse's ray"; nämä muodot kiusaavat Grayn omia "lapsen silmiä" tuoden hänet Shakespearen, "kuolemattoman Pojan" läheisyyteen. "Itämaiset sävyt", jotka häikäisivät lapsen Greyn, olivat "auringosta lainattuja" — toinen ylevän runollisen (hyperionisen) periaatteen hylkääminen. Oidipaalisen halun (halu "mahtavaan äitiin") ja keskirunoilijan yksinäisen ylevän intohimon välillä ei ole sopivaa keskitietä (vaikka Gray toivoo löytävänsä sellaisen). Runoilijan runon lopussa valitsema "kaukainen tie" on välttämätön kieltäytymisestä olla ylevän näkemyksen runoilija (Milton) ja mahdottomuus omistaa luonnonlapselle ilmestyvää äiti-muusaa (Shakespeare) . Suuri osa oodista on täynnä halun kohtauksia – Miltonin ja Shakespearen – ja on siten huolissaan, vaikkakin salaisesti, seksuaalisen voiman ja runollisen näkemyksen välisestä suhteesta. Harmaa'
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 424: Mr. Grayn runot (1768) sisältää kaksi käännöstä norjasta. "The Fatal Sisters" ja "The Descent of Odin" ovat profetian runoja. Ensimmäistä hallitsee se, mitä Gray esipuheessa kutsuu "kaksitoista jättimäistä hahmoa, jotka muistuttavat naisia", joiden tarkoituksena on kutoa tulevaisuuden verkko ja joiden tie vie toisen kuolleiden kentän läpi ("Kohtalon polkuina me kuljemme, / kahlaamalla throa" 'th' ensangin'd field..." Varhaisen säkeen helposti tunnistettava haluhahmo on korvattu valtavilla kauhistuttavilla muodoilla, " Mista musta, loistava piika, / Sangrida ja Hilda ", " Gondula ja Geira "." Sellaiset naiset esiintyivät ensin nimellä Contemplation tai Adversity. He edustavat muse-äiti-kuoleman yhdistettyä identiteettiä, yhtenäistä halun ja auktoriteetin muotoa, jota kohti Grayn mielikuvitus on kulkenut.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 428: Heinäkuussa 1768 Graysta tehtiin modernin historian professori Cambridgessa, vaikka hän ei koskaan luennoinut tai julkaissut aiheesta. Hänen viime vuosien merkittävin henkilökohtainen tapahtuma oli lyhyt, intensiivinen ystävyys nuoren sveitsiläisen opiskelijan Karl Victor von Bonstettenin kanssa. Ystävyyttä ilmeisesti monimutkaisi Grayn fyysinen halu, vaikka heidän välillään ei uskota olevan seksuaalista suhdetta. Heinäkuussa 1771 Gray sairastui syödessään Pembroke Collegessa; viikkoa myöhemmin, heinäkuun 30. päivänä, hän kuoli. Hänen matkamuistoissaan(1832) Bonstetten pohdiskeli runoilijaa: "Je crois que Gray n'avait jamais aimé, c'était le mot de l'énigme, il en était résulté une misère de coeur qui faisait kontraste avec son mielikuvitus, kiihkeä, et profond au lieu de faire le bonheur de sa vie, n'en était que le tourment" (Mielestäni avain mysteeriin on se, että Gray ei koskaan rakastanut; tuloksena oli sydämen köyhyys, joka oli ristiriidassa hänen kiihkeän ja syvällisen mielikuvituksensa kanssa, mikä sen sijaan hänen elämänsä onnen käsittäminen oli vain sen piina).
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 439: He was born in Cairo and educated at Alleyn's School, Dulwich College, and Guys' Hospital, although he did not complete his studies.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 442: Erään aiemman paasauxen mukaan EM Forster oli homo, kuin myös Brooks Forester, the 6'2″, 28-year-old Sales rep/part-time model/Mormon from Salt Lake City competing for Desiree's heart this season of the Bachelorette is also sparking a few gay rumors and gaining a gay fan base like Sean Lowe.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 444: Of course, most readers will want to learn about Hornblower (one of the few fictional characters with a biography), where that name came from, and what mechanism the father used to develop the many characters in his novels. But who would be startled to learn that Forester played an important role in the propaganda used by the UK to encourage the US’s entrance into WW2?
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 446: Born in Cairo, Forester had a complicated life, including imaginary parents, a secret marriage, a murder charge, and a debilitating illness. He was educated at Alleyn's School and Dulwich College in Dulwich, South London. He married Kathleen Belcher in 1926, had two sons, and divorced in 1945. His eldest son, John, was a noted cycling activist and wrote a biography of his father.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 450: The popularity of the Hornblower series, built around a central character who was heroic but not too heroic, has continued to grow over time. It is perhaps rivalled only by the much later Aubrey–Maturin series of seafaring novels by Patrick O'Brian (n.h.). Both Hornblower and Aubrey are based in part on the historical Admiral Lord Dunder Fart of Great Britain (known as Lord Cochrane during the period when the novels are set).
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 452: Brian Perett has written a book The Real Hornblower: The Life and Times of Admiral Sir James Gordon, GCB, ISBN 1-55750-968-9, presenting the case for a different inspiration, namely James Alexander Gordon. In his work "The Hornblower Companion", however, Forester makes no indication of any historical influences or inspiration regarding his character. Rather, he describes a process whereby Hornblower was constructed based on what attributes made good sales for a typical Hornblower story, namely "A Happy End" (published in America as "Beat them to Smithereens").
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 454: Forester does reveal that the original trigger for his central character as an officer in the Royal Navy was his finding of three bound volumes of the Naval Chronicle when looking in a second-hand bookshop for some reading matter to take on a small sailboat; this, he implies, provided enough material for his lively subconscious to work on to ensure the eventual emergence of the Hornblower we know.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 475: He empowered children with his stories, though the content was sometimes questioned for its open references to magic, racism, alcohol abuse, and use of words like “ass” and “slit”. Of course with his free use of such words, maybe it shouldn’t be surprising that he was simultaneously trying his hand at children's genitals and pornographic stories for Playboy, further muddying his reputation.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 477: But as famed as Dahl was as a writer, he was an equally legendary (wo)manizer. He was quick to seduce and bed married (wo)men, and engaged in extramarital affairs of his own before divorcing his wife and marrying his mistress.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 479: Anti-Semitic sentiments appear in many of his stories, inspired by Jewish publishers who had turned down his work – sentiments for which he never really apologized. In 1983, he told a journalist, “There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity. I mean there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.”
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 481: Roald Dahl's children's books are full of barely submerged misogyny, lust and violence. Roald Dahl was an unpleasant man who wrote macabre books – and yet children around the world adore them. Perhaps this shouldn’t surprise us, writes Hephzibah (Hetty) Anderson. Kids can be so cruel. Oh can we? Thanx mom! .... Oow! Oow!
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 565: Pindar wrote an enormous number of poems, which the Alexandrian scholars divided in seventeen books. His poetry included dithyrambs, paeans, scholia, encomia, prosodia, treni, parthenia, and epinicia, the last being the only surviving work of his, from the others we have only a few fragments.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 567: Quintilian described him as "by far the greatest of the nine lyric poets, in virtue of his inspired magnificence, the beauty of his thoughts and figures, the rich exuberance of his language and matter, and his rolling flood of eloquence". However, not all the ancients shared Quintilian's enthusiasm. The Athenian comic playwright Eupolis is said to have remarked that the poems of Pindar "are already reduced to silence by the disinclination of the multitude for elegant learning".
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 573: Like other poets of the Archaic Age, he reveals a deep sense of the vicissitudes of life and yet, unlike them, he also articulates a passionate faith in what men can achieve by the grace of the gods, most famously expressed in his conclusion to one of his Victory Odes: Creatures of a day! What is a man? What is he not? A dream of a shadow Is our mortal being. But when there comes to men A gleam of splendour given of heaven, Then rests on them a light of glory And blessed are their days.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 602: Has curb'd the fury of his car, On hillinnyt autonsa raivoa,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 603: And dropp'd his thirsty lance at thy command. Ja pudotti janoisen keihäänsä käskystäsi.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 608: The terror of his beak, and light'nings of his eye. Hänen nokkansa kauhu ja hänen silmänsä valot.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 682: Stretch'd forth his little arms, and smiled. Ojensi pienet kätensä ja hymyili.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 683: This pencil take (she said) whose colours clear Tämä lyijykynä (hän ​​sanoi), jonka värit ovat selkeät
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 686: This can unlock the gates of Joy; Tämä hampaaton avain tässä voi avata ilon portit;
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 698: Clos'd his eyes in endless night. Sulki silmänsä loputtomana yönä.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 705: Hark, his hands thy lyre explore! Horatio, hänen kätensä tahtoo tutkia sun huilua!
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 716: Yet oft before his infant eyes would run Silti usein ennen kuin hänen sukkansa silmät juoksivat
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 719: Yet shall he mount, and keep his distant way Mutta hän nousee ylös ja pysyy kaukana
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 731: A story relates the origin of the phrase to a comic song of the 1840s, written and performed by one Tom Hudson, which tells of a sailor who returns from a voyage to discover that his wife has married another sailor in his absence.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 772: The spider turned him round about, and went into his den, Hämähäkki kääntyi ja painui peremmälle pesään,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 775: And set his table ready, to dine upon the fly. Ja kattoi pöydän valmiixi kärpäsateriaa varten.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 776: Then he went out to his door again, and merrily did sing, Size meni takas ovelle ja lauloi hilpeästi:
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 782: Alas, alas! how very soon this silly little fly, Voi, voi! eipä aikaakaan niin tyhmä kärpänen,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 783: Hearing his wily, flattering words, came slowly flitting by; Kuultuaan hämähäkin mielistelysanat, lensi ohi;
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 790: He dragged her up his winding stair, into his dismal den, Se raahasi hiänet kierreportaita miesluolaansa,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 791: Within his little parlour – but she ne'er came out again! Pikku olokammariinsa - mistä hiän ei koskaan palannut!
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 792: – And now, dear little children, who may this story read, - Ja nyt tyttöset jotka tähän asti maltoitte lukea,
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 795: And take a lesson from this tale, of the Spider and the Fly. Ottakaa opixenne satu hämähäkistä ja kärpäsestä.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 804: They had not gone far before they saw the Mock Turtle in the distance, sitting sad and lonely on a little ledge of rock, and, as they came nearer, Alice could hear him sighing as if his heart would break. She pitied him deeply. `What is his sorrow?' she asked the Gryphon, and the Gryphon answered, very nearly in the same words as before, `It's all his fancy, that: he hasn't got no sorrow, you know. Come on!'
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 808: `This here young lady,' said the Gryphon, `she wants for to know your history, she do.'
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 844: "What matters it how far we go?" his scaly friend replied. Mitä väliä menemmekö liian pitkälle, kysyi eväkäs.
    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 853:
    A 1907 cartoon depicting Harriman and his railroads as subject to federal law and the Interstate Commerce Commission

    xxx/ellauri235.html on line 857: In March 1920, the ICC had Eben Moody Boynton, the inventor of the Boynton Bicycle Railroad, committed as a lunatic to an asylum in Washington, D.C. Boynton's monorail electric light rail system, it was reported, had the potential to revolutionize transportation, superseding then-current train travel. ICC officials said that they had Boynton committed because he was "worrying them to death" in his promotion of the bicycle railroad. Based on his own testimony and that of a Massachusetts congressman, Boynton won release on May 28, 1920, overcoming testimony of the ICC's chief clerk that Boynton was virtually a daily visitor at ICC offices, seeking Commission adoption of his proposal to revolutionize the railroad industry. CS Forester's bicyclist son John would have applauded Boynton's invention.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 134: Among modern Western male heteronormal scholars, Sappho´s sexuality is still debated – André Lardinois has described it as the "Great Sappho Question". Early translators of Sappho sometimes heterosexualised her poetry. Ambrose Philips´ 1711 translation of the Ode to Aphrodite portrayed the object of Sappho´s desire as male, a reading that was followed by virtually every other translator of the poem until the twentieth century, while in 1781 Alessandro Verri interpreted fragment 31 as being about Sappho´s love for a guy named Phaon. Friedrich Gottlieb Welcker argued that Sappho´s feelings for other women were "entirely idealistic and non-sensual", while Karl Otfried Müller wrote that fragment 31 described "nothing but a friendly affection": Glenn Most comments that "one wonders what language Sappho would have used to describe her feelings if they had been ones of sexual excitement", if this theory were correct. By 1970, it would be argued that the same poem contained "proof positive of [Sappho´s] lesbianism".
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 138: One longstanding suggestion of a social role for Sappho is that of "Sappho as schoolmistress". At the beginning of the twentieth century, the German classicist Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff posited that Sappho was a sort of schoolteacher, to "explain away Sappho´s passion for her ´girls´" and defend her from accusations of homosexuality. The view continues to be influential, both among scholars and the general public, though more recently the idea has been criticised by historians as anachronistic and has been rejected by several prominent classicists as unjustified by the evidence. In 1959, Denys Page, for example, stated that Sappho´s extant fragments portray "the loves and jealousies, the pleasures and pains, of Sappho and her companions"; and he adds, "We have found, and shall find, no trace of any formal or official or professional relationship between them... no trace of Sappho the principal of an academy." Toisin kuin Ailin kohalla, hehe.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 140: None of Sappho´s own poetry mentions her teaching, and the earliest testimonium to support the idea of Sappho as a teacher comes from Ovid (a notorious nincompoop), six centuries after Sappho´s lifetime. Despite these problems, many newer interpretations of Sappho´s social role are still based on this idea. In these interpretations, Sappho was involved in the ritual education of girls, for instance as a trainer of choruses of girls. Niikö Ailin kerhotoimintaa, osallistumista kylän sukupuolielämän monipuolistamiseen.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 239: Vankeusaika merkitsi Renqvistille mahdollisuutta panna korkki pullon suulle ja syventää ajatuksiaan. Hän julkaisi ensimmäiset raittiusaiheiset kirjoituksensa. 1835 painettiin Renqvistin tunnetuin teos Viinan kauhistus ja samana vuonna hänet määrättiin kappalaiseksi Sortavalaan, missä toimessa hän pysyi kuolemaansa saakka.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 262: G. O. Waseniuksen kolmesta avioliitosta syntyi 12 lasta, joista 7 saavutti aikuisiän. Adolf Fredrikistä tuli Tervakosken paperitehtaan omistaja ja kehittäjä sekä moninkertainen valtiopäiväedustaja ja Valfrid Vaseniuksesta Suomen ja Pohjoismaiden kirjallisuudenhistorian professori sekä niin sanotun Valvojan ryhmän perustajäsen. Isänsä lehden menestyksekkäästä toimittajasta Z. Topeliuksesta kirjoittamassaan massiivisessa, monituhatsivuisessa elämäkerrassa Valfrid Vasenius kuvasi samalla eläytyvästi isänsä sukupolven suuria murroksia. Jossain määrin paradoksaalista on se, että G. O. Waseniuksen jälkimaine helsinkiläisten keskuudessa perustuu paljolti kuuluisaan Waseniuksen kirjakauppaan, joka toimi Esplanadilla vuoteen 1969 saakka. Kaupan nimi jäi elämään, vaikka sen perustaja myi kirjakauppansa pois jo 1851.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 373: Tyty Arolakin on joutunut Marken pauloihin. Merikadun rapussa asui Arola, jonka kreikkalainen vaimo oli aika typy. Jöns meni haistelemaan hissiä kun se lähti ulos.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 382: Lyhyt kertaus Marquetan tyttöystävistä: Äiti (pyhimys), Kaija (tyylikäs), soitonopettaja (miehekäs), Hilma-täti (ex-juro), Saimi-täti (ditto), karjakko-Sanna (ditto), Paulan äiti (hiiri), Siiri-täti (ditto), mummu (dementti), Anneli (serkku), Paula (ex-kärkevä), Irmeli (terhakka), Annukka (dollface), Kaarina (luuviulu), Ursula (klenkka), Tyty Arola (ex-nemesis). Niin ja sitten pojat, johin premenstruaalisilla tytöillä ei ole mitään kiinnostusta vielä: Topi (visukinttu), Eero (sankarillinen), Riku (ryhditön). "Kaikki muut" ovat jotain nimettömiä Ankkoja. Marquetasta on tullut hyvin luokkatietoinen. Sitten hyvin kevein vedoin hahmotellut muut opet (ei edes genitaaleista ole tietoa): voimistelunopettaja Visa (ok), Rexi (tiukkailmeinen), matikanope Puputti (kiukkuinen), historianope Hemppa (hajamielinen), ja "kaikki muut". Mummu ja Marquetta toistelevat sanoja, kumpikohan on dementimpi. Marke meinaa että pahat ajatuxet pitää pitää sisällä. Millanenhan Aili Konttinen siitäkin tulee ajan kanssa, tuleeko joku vielä viikatoimaan senkin.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 684: Neruda’s death certificate established the cause of death as cancer cachexia, which involves significant weight loss, but the forensic specialists unanimously found that to be impossible. “That cannot be correct,” said Dr. Niels Morling, of the University of Copenhagen’s department of forensic medicine, who participated in the analysis. “There was no indication of cachexia. He was an obese man at the time of death. All other circumstances in his last phase of life pointed to some kind of infection.” Neruda was infected with the Staphylococcus aureus bacterium, which can be highly toxic and result in death if modified.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 687: Obviously the fat poet was assassinated for his close connections to ousted Chilean President Salvador Allende.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 694: Feminist groups, who highlighted a passage in Neruda´s memoirs describing a sexual assault by a young house maid in 1929 (at 25) while stationed in Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Several feminist groups stated that Neruda should not be honoured by his country, describing the passage as evidence of rape. Neruda remains a controversial figure for Chileans, and especially for Chilean feminists. For most of his life, Neruda was fascinated by butterflies.
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 834: ¿Destierro? Sí. ¿Ardiente? Sin duda. ¿Desconsolado? Seguramente no fue para tanto… Estar en Capri con los amigos y la amante no debe estar tan mal…Y es que Neruda, además de uno de los poetas más grandes de la historia en lengua castellana, era un hombre un poco exagerado y no muy sincero. Pero, quién esté libre de pecado….
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 841: They met in Santiago in 1946, when she was working as a physical therapist in Chile. She was the first woman in Latin America to work as a podiatric therapist. Urrutia was the inspiration behind Neruda´s later love poems beginning with Los Versos del Capitan in 1951, which the poet withheld publication until 1961 to spare the feelings of his previous wife; as well as 100 Love Sonnets which includes a beautiful dedication to her (which one?).
    xxx/ellauri237.html on line 1021: Mikki opiskeli aluksi maataloutta, historiaa ja teologiaa Wisconsinin yliopistossa Madisonissa (alempi korkeakoulututkinto 1924 pääaineena historia) ja oli sitten kaksi vuotta New Yorkissa teologisessa seminaarissa (Union Theological Seminary).
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 102: Kiinalaisen perinteen mukaan Laozi eli 500-luvulla ennen ajanlaskun alkua. Historioitsijat ovat pitäneet häntä joko useiden historiallisten hahmojen synteesinä, myyttisenä hahmona tai todellisena henkilönä, joka eli 300-luvulla eaa. taistelevien läänitysvaltioiden ja sadan koulukunnan aikakaudella. Laozin ansioksi on laskettu henkiinjääminen ehkä tylsimpänä 100:sta koulukunnasta, sekä taolaisuuden keskeisen teoksen Daodejingin kirjoittaminen. Se tunnettiin alun perin yksinkertaisesti nimellä Laozi.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 110: Leo Tolstoy was deeply influenced by Taoist philosophy, and wrote his own interpretation of Wu Wei in his piece Non-Activity. Pekka Ervasti on suomentanut koko paskan muiden länkkärien avulla, sanoen esipuheessa:
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 155: I get asked this question a lot, as I am sure other pro-life Catholics do too. It’s as if the basic assumption in the question is “if Jesus said nothing against it, then it must be OK.”
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 173: As a good practicing Jew, Jesus would have had the same attitude toward children. In fact, we have stories about his relationships with children that are loving and caring. Would he have needed to say anything about abortion as everyone he spoke to believed the same thing? Jesus only preached about things that needed interpretation or a re-interpretation. If everyone knew what was right and wrong about abortion, why would he need to preach about it?
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 175: I am sure, as you probably are too, that there were Jewish girls who got pregnant outside of marriage. It is no stretch of the imagination that Roman soldiers could have raped them. Since men are men, I do not doubt that incest existed in Jesus’ community. But Jesus had nothing at all to say about these things. The only examples we have are of his being aware of adultery and prostitution. But there is no mention of abortion to handle rape or incest. It is far more likely that if a girl was pregnant, the solution was to marry her off quickly. We have the example of Jesus’ mother Mary being married quickly to Joseph when she was found to be pregnant. I suspect other parents would do the same.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 179: Was Jesus a republican? As far as we know. Some of his best friends were publicans. Think how much trouble would have been saved all around if Mary had had an abortion.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 337: Miehet pelaavat rahapelejä naisia useammin. Naisista 75 prosenttia ja miehistä 82 prosenttia oli pelannut rahapelejä edeltävän vuoden aikana. Yleisintä pelaaminen on 25–44-vuotiaiden ikäryhmissä.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 376: The Walking Dead is an American post-apocalyptic horror television series based on the comic book series of the same name by Robert Kirkman, Tony Moore, and Charlie Adlard—together forming the core of The Walking Dead franchise. The series features a large ensemble cast as survivors of a zombie apocalypse trying to stay alive under near-constant threat of attacks from zombies known as "walkers" (among other nicknames). With the collapse of modern civilization, these survivors must confront other human survivors who have formed groups and communities with their own sets of laws and morals, sometimes leading to open, hostile conflict between them. Tää on varmaan Homer Simpsonin zombieiden esikuva.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 417: La propriété, c'est le vol ! est une phrase inspirée de l'ouvrage Qu'est-ce que la propriété ? (1840) du philosophe anarchiste français Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Il est possible qu'elle ait été créée par Jacques Pierre Brissot dans ses Recherches philosophiques sur le droit de propriété et le vol dès 1780, mais Proudhon affirme ne pas avoir lu son livre avant d'utiliser la formule.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 480: Hvad Iaver en pæn pige som dig et sted som dette? What's a nice girl like you doing in a place like this? Tää pæn on ilmeisesti sama kuin hiihtopipojen sana pen.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 595: Vuonna 1975 syntynyttä naista kuvaillaan erittäin pidetyksi kollegaksi, joka levitti ympärilleen iloa monen monta kiloa. Lapset eivät olleet yhteisiä. Ei ollut Hankenilta valmistunut. LinkedInin mukaan Arcada-ammattikorkeakoulusta. Sieltä löytyy työhistoriaakin. Osake- ja kiinteistöomistuxia. Merenrantakiinteistö. Mäyräkoira. Bobilla saattoi olla kassakriisi uhkaamassa. Tai sitten ei: sen firma oli muka tehnyt 200K voittoa. Iltalehti tietää kertoa että naimisiin on menty 2021 ja avioehto löytyy.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 626: Kys. lääkärin toiminta on kuin jostain trainspotting elokuvasta. Ei juuri typerämmin voi toimia. Keskiverto katunarkkikin onnistuu sentään siirtämään ruumiin ulos asunnosta ja nostamaan sen autoon. Voin kuvitella sitä näkyä kun narukätinen lekurimme on ähissyt vaimokettaan takakonttiin ja joka yrityksen jälkeen ruumis on pötkähtänyt maahan. Sitten paikalle on pärähtänyt naapuri kyselemään että mikä meininki. Ja murhayritys ajamalla auto koleraaltaaseen on myös kuin jostain kummelista.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 649: Ei tosiaan ole hissiä tarvittu. Yksi porrasväli tai jopa puolikas. Pihan poikki on vedetty ahkiolla, kun ei rakennustelineiden takia saanut autoa pihaovelle.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 705: Tuollainen valoketju näyttäisi olevan heti porraskäytävän sisäänkäynnin yläpuolella olevalla toisen kerroksen parvekkeella. Vaikka ei mattokääre mahtuisi hissiin, niin yhden kerrosvälin voinee aika hyvin vielä vetää mattoa rappusiakin pitkin alas. Ja jos päihin on solmittu tiukat narut ja vielä varmuudeksi jätesäkit päihin, ettei raajoja tai jotain muuta ruumiiseen kuuluvaa ala retkottamamaan ulkona, niin sekin toki hieman auttaa.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 769: Hyvä tietysti, että tästä syystä hän jäi heti kiinni. Jonkun pohtima nokkakärry olisi voinut toimia paremmin. Juha Louhihan onnistui logistiikassaan paljon paremmin, kun sulloi kidnappaamansa miljonäärisuvun naisen puulaatikkoon ja jonkinlaiseksi kuljetusammattilaiseksi pukeutuneena kuskasi tämän nokkakärryllä pakuun ja edelleen säilytykseen Turkuun. Talo lienee ollut samantapainen kuin tässä ja kaappajan harmiksi laatikko oli hikuan liian iso mahtuakseen veräjähissiin ja hänen piti käyttää portaita.
    xxx/ellauri239.html on line 830: 8 kanadalaista 13-16v tyttöä jotka tunsivat toisensa vain netistä puukottivat hengiltä 59-vuotiaan spugen joka ei hyvällä luovuttanut niille hallussaan olevaa alkoholia. Ystävyxet hoitivat puukotuxen yhteishengessä kuin Malory Towersin tytöt. Ei siinä kauan nokka tohissut, kolmessa minuutissa oli ukko kylmänä (EK). Osoittivat samaa joulun henkeä joka Joulumyrkyssä sai tanskalaisen muijan jättämään satunnaisen kävelevän kyrvänpään joka juuri nuohosi sitä invaliidivessassa ja palaamaan Froden syleilyyn mulkeron runkut vielä pikkareihin valuen (F).
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 146: Flera av hans böcker behandlar samhälleliga teman och riktar kritik mot Kinas kommunistmyndigheter, både i historiskt perspektiv och i fråga om samtiden. Mo Yan är dock fortsatt själv medlem i Kinas kommunistiska parti med motiveringen att det skulle väcka onödiga frågor och uppseende om han gick ur. Mo Yan har kritiserats för detta av kinesiska dissidentförfattare. Men ingen av dem var något bra så vi kunde inte riktigt ge priset direkt åt dom.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 156: Fante was diagnosed with diabetes in 1955, which ultimately cost him his eyesight and led to the 1977 amputation of his toes and feet, and later legs. He died on May 8, 1983.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 159: He is best known for his semi-autobiographical novel Ask the Dust (1939) about the life of Arturo Bandini, a struggling writer in Depression-era Los Angeles. It is widely considered the great Los Angeles novel, and is one in a series of four, published between 1938 and 1985, that are now collectively called "The Bandini Quartet". Ask the Dust was adapted into a 2006 film starring Colin Farrell and Salma Hayek.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 164: This is not a movie for the masses. It is, however, a small film about real life hardships and their tragic consequences. While the dialogue and careful pacing befits the original novel, the film sometimes drags because of it. Towne has not given us the great American love story, but he has presented us with a captivating view of 1933 Los Angeles and a tale of romance that involves us in the plight of the characters.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 228: Ryssland rasar – Finland firade självständigheten med rysk flaggbränning. Ilskan efter självständighetsdagen. ”Oacceptabel handling” kanske men inget brott. I Finland är det endast brottsligt att vanära den finska flaggan, och kanske ära Hakenkreuz. Det är nuförtiden helt okej at vanära ryssarna. EU-flaggan får man bränna om man vill, det är ingen lag mot det. Vi får se vad som händer när NATO-fanan hissas upp vid riksdagshuset.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 271: A collapsed narcissist is a person who was previously narcissistic but has since become very insecure and suffers from low self-esteem. This often happens when the individual's inflated ego and sense of superiority are met with criticism or rejection.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 306: Debby: Let them collapse and go to hell. They cry to everyone that they are a victim when they continually shoot themselves in the foot. It’s a pathetic disgusting and completely nauseating display. I had sympathy for the devil once, I also sold my soul to the devil, and I put my feet in his fire. I will burn no more.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 308: Kimberly: Exactly. Once you’ve been abused, tortured, provoked, manipulated, and had your reputation dragged through the mud, it’s hard to find any sympathy for them. Deep down I feel badly that my ex had to have the pathetic parents he did, since they are the ones fully responsible for his behavior and mental disorder, but at the end of the day, he’s a grown man and needs to learn to own up to his own shortcomings. God have mercy on him… because I sure don’t.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 312: Nicolas: God! I don't know who is the good from the bad anymore. Reading these comments sounds no better then that of what you damn. I don't see anything in the world today but self serving people that excuse themselves from the hate they put into the world by the hate that the world has made them endure. It's a gross cycle that makes me fear the end is not a possibility until the sweet escape of death. Everyday I welcome that silence more and more. Life's thin vale of beauty was taken by the one I trusted most. Yet it is the true face of this world I now see. From such betrayal I am left with a world consumed by the poison it shames. I welcome anything that takes this away. I ask for nothing because nothing is exactly what I desire most.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 314: Brad: Nearly all 21st century western women under 40 are crazy, and disloyal. This is the 1st time in human history where women have had this much power. What's the result you ask? 70 percent of marriage ending in divorce; 90 percent of which are filed by women. 50 percent of men say they regret marriage too the woman their currently with. Why might you ask? Cause they're on their best behavior until they have the money then they hulk smash you into oblivion. 94 percent child support going from male to female, and 92 percent of alimony. The old saying is the woman got married thinking the man would change and the man got married hoping she never would. They were both disappointed in the end. I'll let you decide which genders thought process is more Nobel. For me it's obvious.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 318: Justsum Nobodee: Sucker!!! This had to have been written by a collapsed narcissist. Poor poor narcissist, finally alone after shitting on everyone, destroying children, screaming, lying, trickery, snickering, selfish, back stabbing, manipulation, hypocrites, humiliating innocent people, stealing other peoples children. oh poor them. Bless their heart. They are the victim here. Just give them more attention.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 327:
    Han ser ut som en erigert, våt penis skjövet øver baken til den som hade på sig byxene.
    Ei ihme että Nääsböö pitää John Malkovichista, nehän on kuin 2 marjaa.
    Onhan se hienoa kun äijällä on tenoriääni ja naisellinen suu.

    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 342: Romanen fokuserer på hovedpersonen, Henry Chinaski, mellom 1920 og 1941, og begynner med Chinaskis tidlige minner. Etter hvert som historien utvikler seg, følger leseren livet gjennom hans skoleår og som ung voksen. Chinaski forteller at han har en voldelig far, og hans mor gjør ingenting for å forhindre farens misbruk. Henry er ikke særlig atletisk, men forsøker så godt han kan på å forbedre seg. Fotball er vanskelig for ham, men han nyter volden som følger med. Han har bare litt bedre resultater i baseball. Chinaski utvikler seg gjennom grunnskolen, og har fokus på sport, vold og jenter. Han er en simpel dummer apa han. Just liksom Jo Nesbø.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 354: Harry pääsee pyytämättä Kaijan pukille s. 352. Saman vrk sisällä kuin Michael Bellman. Kaija ei vitkastele, sen nenä ei tuhise näissä hommissa. Onkohan Kaijassa vielä Mikin runkkua. Tod.näk. on. Mutta onnexi Harryn kyrvännuppi on silleen muotoiltu että se poistaa Kripon runkkua joka ulosvedolla.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 360: Kirjassa Mitä naisten pitää tietää miehistä oli naisen tekemä hyvä havainto: miehet ei kanna kaunaa eikä pidä ikuisia henkkoht vihamiehiä, vaan vaihtaa tiimiä kun se näyttää niistä kannattavalta kaupalta. Alaisten naisten luistimet usein luiskahtaa näissä käänteissä. Tämmönen kauppa on nyt käynnissä Harryn ja Mikin välillä. Varmaan ne voi kohta höylätä Kaijaa vuoropäivinä tai vaikka samaan aikaankin eri reijillä. Hieno juttu muuten että Harryn isäpappa koomaantui juuri sopivalla hetkellä.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 431: Sometimes you can tell from the first shot. In “Compartment No. 6,” the camera follows a young woman at a party as she leaves a bathroom and enters a living room full of gathered friends. That walking, back-of-the-head shot is one of the soggiest conventions of the steadicam era, a facile way of conveying characters’ own fields of vision while anchoring the action on them. The familiarity of this trope suggests both limited imagination and an unwillingness to commit to a clear-cut point of view. When used cannily, it can convey ambiguous neutrality and looming mystery, but, more often, it suggests the merely functional recording of action, which is exactly what’s delivered in “Compartment No. 6,” opening in theatres on Wednesday. The movie sinks, fast and deep, under the weight of dramatic shortcuts, overemphatic details, undercooked possibilities, unconsidered implications. It’s heavy-handed, tendentious, and regressive—and it should come as no surprise that it’s on the fifteen-film shortlist for the Best International Feature Oscar.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 435: It’s a tale of the endearing Russian bear, which rings discordantly when that bear has its claws out for its neighbors. Russians can't be nice! It is all russki propaganda! It depicts a woman’s quick forgiveness of a sexual predator with whom she’s forced to associate. (What the fuck, some sexual predator indeed, won't even give to her when she asks.) It’s about the fecklessness of the intellectual class and the blank emptiness of the Western (and Westernized) bourgeoisie—the screenplay deliberately leaves F.F. blank, even unto her name. Ljoha isn’t quite as blank, because in his unguarded drunkenness, he blurts out a few of his prejudices and acts out his impulses.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 450: What’s not fine is that Laura eventually initiates physical intimacy with Ljoha. The film’s logic is that she’s in an emotionally vulnerable state and he’s the only one there for her, because Irina can’t even bother to muster up any excitement when Laura calls. Of course it’s entirely possible that she is bisexual. Still, hasn’t Mr. Kuosmanen learned the inherent offensiveness of depicting such sexual fluidity after Kevin Smith made this mistake in 1997 with “Chasing Amy?” “Blue is the Warmest Color” only went on to prove in 2013 the toxicity of this plot device.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 465: Kuosmanen has crafted a drama within a clearly defined moment in recent history, only to refuse to be tied to it. This approach to period storytelling proves far more intriguing than the romantic drama within this setting.

    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 508: "hey, this thing is still hard!" "Hei, täähän on puoliveteessä!"
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 533: in the history of women and naisten ja miesten välillä,
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 548: In 1986, Time called Bukowski a "laureate of American lowlife". Regarding his enduring popular appeal, Adam Kirsch of The New Yorker wrote, "the secret of Bukowski's appeal is that he combines the confessional poet's promise of intimacy with the larger-than-life aplomb of a pulp-fiction hero."
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 549: During his lifetime, Bukowski received little attention from academic critics in the USA, but was better received in Europe, particularly the UK, and especially Germany, where he was born. Since his death in March 1994, Bukowski has been the subject of a legion of critical articles and books about both his life and writings, every other wannabe James Dean scrambling to get their slice of Bukowski's steak and kidney pie.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 554: His father was Heinrich (Henry) Bukowski, an American of German descent who had served in the U.S. army of occupation after World War I and had remained in Germany after his army service. His mother was Katharina (née Fett). His paternal grandfather, Leonard Bukowski, had moved to the United States from Imperial Germany in the 1880s. In Cleveland, Ohio, Leonard met Emilie Krause, an ethnic German, who had emigrated from Danzig, Prussia (today Gdańsk, Poland). They married and settled in Pasadena, California, where Leonard worked as a successful carpenter. The couple had four children, including Heinrich (Henry), Charles Bukowski's father. His mother, Katharina Bukowski, was the daughter of Wilhelm Fett and Nannette Israel The name Israel is widespread among Catholics in the Eifel region. Bukowski assumed his paternal ancestor had moved from Poland to Germany around 1780, as "Bukowski" is a Polish last name. As far back as Bukowski could trace, his whole family was German.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 556: Bukowski's parents met in Andernach following World War I. His father was German-American and a sergeant in the United States Army serving in Germany after the empire's defeat in 1918. He had an affair with Katharina, a German friend's sister, and she subsequently became pregnant. Bukowski repeatedly claimed to be born out of wedlock, but Andernach marital records indicate that his parents married one month before his birth. Afterwards, Bukowski's father became a building contractor, set to make great financial gains in the aftermath of the war, and after two years moved the family to Pfaffendorf (today part of Koblenz). However, given the crippling postwar reparations being required of Germany, which led to a stagnant economy and high levels of inflation, he was unable to make a living and decided to move the family to the U.S. On April 23, 1923, they sailed from Bremerhaven to Baltimore, Maryland, where they settled.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 558: The family moved to Mid-City, Los Angeles, in 1930. Bukowski's father was often unemployed. To while away his time, with his mother's acquiescence, his father was frequently abusive, both physically and mentally, beating his son for the smallest real or imagined offense. Heini later told an interviewer that his father beat him with a razor strop three times a week from the ages of six to 11 years. He says that it helped his writing, as he came to understand undeserved as well as well deserved pain.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 560: Young Bukowski spoke English with a strong German accent and was taunted by his childhood playmates with the epithet "Heinie", German diminutive of Heinrich, in his early youth. He was shy and socially withdrawn, a condition exacerbated during his teen years by an extreme case of acne. Neighborhood children ridiculed his accent, acne and the sensible clothing his parents made him wear. Nachdem sein Vater seinen Wehrdienst abgeleistet hatte, fand er jedoch nur eine Arbeit als Milchlieferant. Die Familie lebte aus diesem Grund zeitweise in ärmlichen Verhältnissen. Regelmäßig betrog der Vater außerdem Bukowskis Mutter mit anderen Frauen, betrank sich und misshandelte seinen eigenen Sohn körperlich. In die Pubertät gekommen, litt Bukowski zudem an starker Akne und hatte am ganzen Körper Pusteln, weshalb er ein ganzes Jahr nicht die Schule besuchen "konnte". The Great Depression bottled his rage as he grew up, and gave him much of his voice and material for his writings.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 561: In his early teen years, Bukowski had a cow when he was introduced to alcohol by his friend William "Baldy" Mullinax, depicted as "Eli LaCrosse" in Ham on Rye, son of an alcoholic surgeon. "This 'alcohol' is going to help me for a very long time," he later wrote, describing a method (of drinking) he could use to come to more amicable terms with his own life. After graduating from Los Angeles High School, Bukowski attended Los Angeles City College for two years, taking courses in art, journalism, and literature, before quitting at the start of World War II. He then moved to New York City to begin a career as a financially pinched blue-collar worker with dreams of becoming a writer.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 563: On July 22, 1944, with the war ongoing, Bukowski was arrested by FBI agents in Philadelphia, where he lived at the time, on well grounded suspicion of draft evasion. At a time when the U.S. was at war with Nazi Germany, and many Germans and German-Americans on the home front were suspected of disloyalty, Bukowski's German birth and habit of quoting Mein Kampf "troubled" authorities. He was held for seventeen days in Philadelphia's Moyamensing Prison. Sixteen days later, he failed a psychological examination that was part of his mandatory military entrance physical test and was given a Selective Service Classification of 4-F (unfit for much anything, let alone military service, als physisch sowie mental untauglich für den Militärdienst ).
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 565: Failing to break into the military world, Bukowski grew disillusioned with the publication process and quit writing for almost a decade, a time that he referred to as a "ten-year drunk". These "lost years" formed the basis for his later semiautobiographical chronicles, fictionalized versions of Bukowski's life through his highly stylized alter-ego, Henry Chinaski.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 567: 1947 kehrte Bukowski nach Los Angeles zurück und lernte die zehn Jahre ältere Jane Cooney Baker (1910–1962) kennen, mit der er bis Anfang der 1950er-Jahre zusammenlebte. During part of this period he continued living in Los Angeles, working at a margarine - no, a pickle factory for a short time but also spending some time roaming about the U.S., working sporadically like Donald Duck and staying in cheap rooming houses. Ab 1952, he took a job as a fill-in letter carrier with the United States Post Office Department in Los Angeles, but resigned just before he reached three years' service.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 569: In 1955 oder 1954, Bukowski was treated for a near-fatal bleeding ulcer. After leaving the hospital he began to write poetry. 1955 he "agreed to marry" small-town Texas poet Barbara Frye, but they subsequently divorced in 1958. Frye, die aus einer vermögenden texanischen Familie stammte, war selbst Schriftstellerin und zugleich Herausgeberin eines kleinen, alternativen Literaturmagazins namens Harlekiini. Apparently she later died under mysterious circumstances in India. Following his divorce, Bukowski resumed drinking and continued writing poetry.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 571: By 1960, Bukowski had returned to the post office in Los Angeles siistissä sisätyössä as a letter sorting clerk, a position he held for more than a decade. In 1962, he was distraught over the death of Jane Cooney Baker, his first serious girlfriend. Im Januar 1962 starb Bukowskis frühere Lebensgefährtin Jane Cooney Baker, laut Bukowski infolge ihres übermäßigen Alkoholkonsums. Bukowski turned his inner devastation into a series of poems and stories lamenting her death. 1962 brachte die Literaturzeitschrift The Outsider eine Sonderausgabe über Bukowski und verlieh ihm den Titel „Outsider of the Year“. He had finally found his way inside.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 573: In 1964 a daughter, Marina Louise Bukowski, was born to Bukowski and his then live-in girlfriend Frances Dean Smith. Er war ein liebevoller Vater, sagt Marina Bukowski Stone.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 574: In 1969, Bukowski accepted an offer from Black Sparrow Press publisher John Martin and quit his post office job to dedicate himself to full-time writing. He was then 49 years old. As he explained in a letter at the time, "I have one of two choices – stay in the post office and go crazy ... or stay out here and play at writer and starve. I have decided to starve. Hah, he made a lot of bucks! By the late 1970s, Bukowski's income was sufficient to give up his lucrative live readings.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 576: Bukowski published almost all of his subsequent major works with Black Sparrow Press, which became a highly successful enterprise. Charlie became a sort of honorary hippie. Bukowski live readings were legendary, with the drunk raucous crowd fighting with the drunk raucous poet. The crowd and Bukowski were very very drunk for the event. To top it all, a heckler was near the stage and can be heard clearly. Great publicity!
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 585: Two years later they moved from the East Hollywood area, where he had lived for most of his life, to the harborside community of San Pedro, the southernmost district of Los Angeles. Beighle followed him and they lived together intermittently over the next two years. He eventually "agreed to" marry her by Manly Palmer Hall, a Canadian-born author, mystic, and spiritual teacher, in 1985. Beighle is referred to as "Sara Heinämaa" in Bukowski's novels Women and Hollywood.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 587: In the 1980s, Bukowski collaborated with cartoonist Robert Crumb on a series of comic books with extremely big-assed hippies on huge shoes. Karl was in his sixties by then.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 588: Bukowski died of leukemia on March 9, 1994, in San Pedro, aged 73, shortly after completing his last novel, Pulp Fiction.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 590: The funeral rites, orchestrated by his widow, were conducted by Buddhist monks. His gravestone reads: "Don't Even Try". That is, you wait, and if nothing happens, you wait some more. It's like a fly high on the wall. You wait for it to come to you. When it gets close enough you reach out, slap out and kill it. Or, if you like its looks, you make a pet out of it, like Kärpyli."
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 592: Bukowski's work was subject to controversy throughout his career, and he readily admitted to admiring strong leaders such as Adolf Hitler and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Some guy claimed that his sexism in his poetry, at least in part, translated his life. Feikki spuge setämies jonka näyttämönimi oli vielä "Buck" - nö, 'swar Hank. When women are around, he has to play Man. In a way it's the same kind of 'pose' he plays at in his poetry—Bogart, Eric Von Stroheim. "Whenever my wife Lucia would come with me to visit him he'd play the Man role, but one night she couldn't come I got to Buck's place and found a whole different guy—easy to get along with, relaxed, accessible."
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 596: Bukowski often spoke of Los Angeles as his favorite subject. In a 1974 interview he said, "You live in a town all your life, and you get to know every bitch on the street corner and half of them you have already messed around with. You've got the layout of the whole land. You have a picture of where you are.... Since I was raised in L.A., I've always had the geographical and spiritual feeling of being here. I've had time to learn this city. I can't see any other place than L.A." What the fuck, The guy was pure Hollywood.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 599: But was he a cynic? Was he an efficient epicure like Viennese Australian Singer? Was his mother Israel a Jew? Did he hate his mom?
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 601: His posthumous collections have been heavily 'John Martinized', removing booze, hell and Hitler and replacing dick, cunt and arse with ****. American band Red Hot Chili Peppers reference Bukowski and his works in several songs. A legion of other wannabe baddies have saddled his horses.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 604: Barfly, released in 1987, is a barfingly semi-autobiographical film written by Bukowski and starring Mickey Rourke as Henry Chinaski, who represents Bukowski, and Faye Dunaway as his lover Wanda Wilcox. Sean Penn offered to play Chinaski for one dollar as long as his friend Dennis Hopper would direct,[53] but the European director Barbet Schroeder had invested many years and thousands of dollars in the project and Bukowski felt Schroeder deserved to make it. Bukowski wrote the screenplay, was given script approval, and appears as a bar patron in a brief cameo.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 608: Henry Charles "Hank" Chinaski is the literary alter ego of the American writer Charles Bukowski, appearing in five of Bukowski's novels, a number of his short stories and poems, and the films Barfly and Factotum. Although much of Chinaski's biography is based on Bukowski's own life story, the Chinaski character is still a literary creation that is constructed with the veneer of what the writer Adam Kirsch calls "a pulp fiction hero."
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 610: Chinaski is a writer who worked for years as a mail carrier. An alcoholic, womanizing misanthrope, he serves as both the protagonist and antihero of the novels in which he appears, which span from his poverty-stricken childhood to his middle age, in which he finds some small success as a hippie Idol.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 625: Peter Albert David Singer AC/DC (born 6 July 1946) is an Australian moral philosopher, currently the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University. He specialises in applied ethics and approaches ethical issues from a secular, utilitarian perspective. He is known in particular for his book Animal Liberation (1975), in which he argues in favour of veganism, and his essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality", in which he argues in favour of donating veggies to help the global poor. For most of his career, he was a preference utilitarian, but he stated in The Point of View of the Universe (2014), coauthored with Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, that as he became a celeb and started earning bigger bucks, he had become a hedonistic utilitarian, or utilitarian hedonist.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 631:
    Hmm, how come I was allowed to live? Anyway mm, this is how I like it, licking a delicious licorice dick!

    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 673: Singer analyzes, in detail, why and how other beings' interests should be weighed. In his view, other being's interests should always be weighed according to that being's concrete value to you, and not according to its belonging to some abstract group like animal or veggie. Singer studies a number of ethical issues including race, sex, ability, species, abortion, euthanasia, infanticide, embryo experimentation, the moral status of animals, political violence, overseas aid, and whether we have an obligation to assist others at all. The 1993 second edition adds chapters on refugees, the environment, equality and disability, embryo experimentation, and the proper treatment of academics from Germany or Austria. A third edition published in 2011 omits the chapter on refugees, and contains a new chapter on climate change. A fourth edition is planned that omits climate change and adds a chapter on Russia and Ukraina.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 676: H.L.A Hart's review of the third edition in The New York Review of Books was mixed. While writing that "The utility of selling this utilitarian's book to students of its subject can hardly be exaggerated", Hart also criticized Practical Ethics for philosophical inconsistency in its chapter on abortion. He argues that Singer insufficiently explains how self interest and classical utilitarianism each view abortion, and does not bring out their differences. Self interest of males is strongly against abortion. Besides, carrots are fit food for bunnies only.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 678: To live a good life, the book prescribes: "You can rethink your goals and question what you are doing with your life. That might mean quitting your job, selling your house (if you got one), and going to work for a voluntary organization in India. More often, you just stay on at the U of Melbourne and pen more bestsellers like this.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 681: Singer himself has said, "I am not really satisfied with the book". He has expressed concerns that his argument that an ethical life makes for a happy life "contains an element of wishful thinking", as he does not always do everything that he believes to be morally right (like sell his houses) and so might have underestimated how demanding morality can be, set against other things that might be fulfilling in life, like staying on at the U of Melbourne, licking licorice dicks, and penning more bestsellers like this.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 692: Prior to FTX's collapse, Bankman-Fried was ranked the 41st richest American in the Forbes 400, and the 60th richest person in world by The World's Billionaires. His net worth peaked at $26 billion. In October 2022, he had an estimated net worth of $10.5 billion. By November 8, 2022, amid the bankruptcy of FTX, his net worth was estimated to have dropped 94 percent in a day to $991.5 million according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, the largest one-day drop in the index's history. On November 11, 2022, the Bloomberg Billionaires Index considered Bankman-Fried to have no material wealth. Before his wealth had evaporated, Bankman-Fried was a major donor to Democratic political campaigns, and planned to spend tens of millions in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 694: On December 12, 2022, Bankman-Fried was arrested in the Bahamas and was subsequently extradited to the United States An indictment of him before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York was unsealed on December 13, revealing a range of charges for offenses, including wire fraud, commodities fraud, securities fraud, money laundering, and campaign finance law violations. Bankman-Fried faces up to 115 years in prison if convicted on all eight counts. On January 3, 2023, Bankman-Fried pled not guilty to fraud and other charges. On December 22, Bankman-Fried was released on a $250 million bond, on condition that he reside at his parents' home in California.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 703:
    Ex-bankman fried during his arrest by the Royal Bahamians

    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 709: On being asked about his previously stated ethical views that it's unacceptable to do unethical things for the greater good, he disagreed with those views and said that expressing those views was a "dumb game we woke westerners play where we say all the right shibboleths and so everyone likes us".
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 713: She says she and her siblings were exposed to economics early, learning Bayesian statistics in primary school. At age 8, Ellison gifted her father with an economic study of stuffed animal prices from Toys "R" Us for his birthday.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 716: Bankman-Fried told Good Morning America his relationship with Ellison was brief, about 5 thrusts and a concentrated stare. There is no available information if Caroline Ellison is Jewish or not. Ellison looks like she beeps when going in reverse.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 735: Another woman, who dated the same man several years earlier in a polyamorous relationship, alleges that he had once attempted to put his penis in her mouth while she was sleeping. (TIME is not naming the man, like others in this story, due to the request of one or more women who made accusations against them, and who wanted to shield themselves from possible retaliation.)
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 741: Several of the women who spoke to TIME said that EA’s polyamorous subculture was a key reason why the community had become a hostile environment for women. One woman told TIME she began dating a man who had held significant roles at two EA-aligned organizations while she was still an undergraduate. They met when he was speaking at an EA-affiliated conference, and he invited her out to dinner after she was one of the only students to get his math and probability questions right. He asked how old she was, she recalls, then quickly suggested she join his polyamorous relationship. Shortly after agreeing to date him, “He told me that ‘I could sleep with you on Monday,’ but on Tuesday I’m with this other girl,” she says. “It was this way of being a f—boy but having the moral high ground,” she added. “It’s not a hookup, it’s a poly relationship.” The woman began to feel “like I was being sucked into a cult,” she says.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 763: Kultaisen peniksen syndroomalla viitataan ilmiöön amerikkalaisissa yliopistokaupungeissa. Koulutetuille heteromiehille on Tinderissä kysyntää, koska heitä on yliopistoissa naisia vähemmän. Osa miehistä on alkanut pitää vaihtoehtojaan naismarkkinoilla loputtomina. He jäävät pyyhkäisemään oikealle ikuisesti. Eemilin mielestä Suomea vaivaa kultaisen pillun syndrooma. Kouluttamattomat miehet jäävät pyyhkäisemään lahkeeseen lähes ikuisesti.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 783: Keskiviikkona 1. joulukuuta Tinderin uusi toimitusjohtajatar Renate Nyborg pitää puheen Slushissa. Naisille aloitteen antava Bumble julistaa laittavansa ”deittailun normeja uusiksi”.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 786: "On olemassa tapoja saada se erottumaan," kertoo kasvuyritystapahtuma Slushissa puhunut Tinderin toimitusjohtaja Renate Nyborg. Ensimmäinen asia on profiilikuvat munasta. Niitä olisi hyvä olla vähintään viisi. Myös videota kannattaa kokeilla. Kuvissa sen kannattaa olla tanassa, oikein juhlakunnossa.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 811: history.com/northernireland/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/johnmajor.jpg" height="150px" />
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 816: Sir John Major KG CH (born 29 March 1943) is a British former politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Leader of the Conservative Party from 1990 to 1997. Prior to becoming prime minister, he served as Foreign Secretary and Chancellor of the Exchequer in the third Thatcher government. Läpimätä torykonna toisin sanoen. Sillä oli sellaset jättimäiset teeveelasit jotka tuli muotiin 80-luvun alussa; mäkin ostin sellaset kerran Lauttasaaresta mutten kehannut käyttää sittenkään. Major oli pääministeri Persianlahden sodan aikana. Hänen ensimmäisinä vuosinaan maailmantalous ajautui matalasuhdanteeseen 1980-luvun pitkän nousun jälkeen. Muutenkin meni majurilta enimmäkseen kaikki perseelleen. Henki sentään vielä pihisee.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 818: Larry King (born Lawrence Harvey Zeiger; November 19, 1933 - January 23, 2021) was an American television and radio host, whose awards included 2 Peabodys, an Emmy and 10 Cable ACE Awards. Over his career, he hosted over 50,000 interviews. King was born and raised in New York City to Jewish parents who immigrated to the United States from Belarus in the 1930s. Olixillä jotkut henxelit? Tämäkin heppu on mulle tuiki tuntematon, nevö hööd. Oli sillä.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 849: Paul Haggis's films are heavy-handed. In the Valley of Elah is otherwise an engrossing murder mystery and antiwar statement, featuring a mesmerizing performance from Tommy Lee Jones. A police detective (Charlize Theron) helps a retired Army sergeant (Tommy Lee Jones) search for his son (Donald Duck), a soldier who went missing soon after returning from Iraq. Hank Deerfield (Bugs Bunny), a Vietnam War veteran, learns that his son may have met with foul play after a night on the town with members of his platoon. Rating: R (Some Sexuality/Nudity|Foul Language|Violent and Disturbing Content) Den här artikeln har skapats av Lsjbot, ett program (en robot) för automatisk redigering.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 858: And there came out from the camp of the Philistines a champion named Goliath of Gath, whose height was six cubits and a span [more than 9 feet tall]. 5 He had a helmet of bronze [Why bronze and not iron? Was the iron one in the wash?] on his head, and he was armed with a coat of mail [bronze scale armor] [same question], and the weight of the coat was five thousand shekels of bronze [about 125 pounds]. 6 And he had bronze armor on his legs, and a javelin of bronze slung between his shoulders. 7 The shaft of his spear was like a weaver’s beam, and his spear’s head weighed six hundred shekels of iron [15 pounds]. And his shield-bearer went before him. [No wonder, he was pretty encumbered with all the other bronze on him.]
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 873: Se kriitikko oli oikeassa joka sanoi että Panssarinyrkki on kuin jonkun pakko-oireisen konstruoima mekaano, täynnä liikkuvia osia joilla ei ole muuta virkaa kuin liikkua, vitun iso käkikello joka vilisee mielenkiinnottomia hahmoja, laimiskoittain verta ja isoja pipejä. Kaikilla on taas kerran ollut ihan vitun kurja lapsuus. Eikä tässä vielä kaikki! Kielipuoli Ole ei ihan riitä vihan kohteeksi, vielä tarvitaan pahempi pahis, joka on tää mezästäjän leike. Kyltässä on vähän coitus interruptuxen makua. Puolet pussien sisällöstä tuli etuajassa tyyliin ejaculatio ante portas, ja loppupään venkutus ei enää tunnu samalta. Luvusta 75 (!) eteenpäin on jo sangen kuivaa pakkopullaa.
    xxx/ellauri250.html on line 908: Norjalainen Hääns oli täysvartalotorpedo ja kajakkiperse tahnapää, joka lähti Tanskan kuninkaan rahoituxella Grönlantiin käännyttämään inuiitteja, eli viemään niiltä eväät sekä tuhkatkin pesästä. Kaikkein törkeintä oli että sinne vietiin Köpixestä rangaistusvankeja lisääntymään kuin kaniinit ja tuotiin lopulta isorokko, johon kuoli lähes kaikki alkuperäisasukkaat. Voi helevetti mitä sikailua! Ei tämmöstä jaxa edes kazoa. Vitun "historian elävöitystä."
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 48: Someone who returns from a long absence. A person or thing reborn. A supernatural being that returns from the dead; a zombie or ghost. Esimerkit: They would not visit this undesirable revenant with his insolent wealth and discreditable origin. The undergraduates, our fogey revenant observes, look much as they did.., in outward aspect. Brains... Brains... Brains... naah.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 51: «Hemingway skrev at når du først har åpnet din sjel for Afrika, vil du ikke noe annet sted.» «Hemingway skrev det?» spurte Harry tvilende. «Ja visst, men Hemingway skrev jo sånt romantisk piss hele tiden. Skjøt løver i fylla og pisset den der søte whiskyurinen på kadaverne. Sannheten er at ingen kommer tilbake til Kongo hvis de ikke må.»
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 102: Iason rakennutti Astro-laivan ja etsi sille miehistöä, joka tultiin tuntemaan astronautteina. Atalante oli ainoa nainen, joka pyrki astronautiksi matkalle noutamaan kultaista taljaa. Yleisimmän version mukaan Atalante ei päässyt Astron miehistöön innokkuudestaan huolimatta. Iason ei epäillyt Atalanten kykyjä, vaan arveli että yksi nainen miehistössä toisi huonoa onnea: Iason pelkäsi, että miehistö riitaantuisi keskenään, kun he kilpailisivat Atalanten rakkaudesta. Atalante oli kuitenkin mukana peijaisissa, kun Astron paluun jälkeen järjestettiin kuningas Peliaksen hautajaisten yhteydessä kisat. Atalante osallistui painiotteluun ja niitti mainetta voittamalla Peleuksen. Kyllä se varmaan oli tollanen vähän rotevamman puoleinen naisihminen. Enemmän Synnöve tai Kaisa tyyppinen kuin laiha Tiina Salmi.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 186: When the wild god shrank in his horn and fled kun villin jumalan sarvi rupistui ja läxi
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 187: And foamed and lessened through his wrathful fords vaahdoten ja väheten kiukkuisista vuonoista
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 264: What do ye singing? what is this ye sing? Mittees työ laalatta? Mikä on tää kipale?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 285: Perchance by praying a man shall match his god. et kenties rähmällään apina tapaa herransa.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 289: What shall this man do waking? By the gods, Mitä tää heppu tekee hereillä? Jumalauta,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 340: First Artemis for all this harried land No enste Artemista mä en tästä maasta kiitä,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 366: What storm is this that tightens all our sail? Mikä myrsky tää on josta purjeemme on pulleat?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 384: Nay, for this maiden hath no touch of love. Ehe, tällä neidolla ei ole rakkaudesta mitään tietoa.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 408: And feed myself with patience; but this most, Ja koitan kestää, muta tää kaikkein eniten
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 409: This moves me, that for wise men as for fools Käy iholle, että viisaille samoin kuin tyhmille
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 435: I dreamed that out of this my womb had sprung Mä näin unta että mun kohdusta oli purskahtanut
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 436: Fire and a firebrand; this was ere my son, Tulta ja tulikiveä; tää oli ennenkun mun poika
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 444: As this my son was: such a birth God sent Niin jaloa kun tää kaveri: sellasen syntymän jumala lähetti
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 447: Saying This for strength and That for luck, and one Sanoen Tää on habaa Toi on onnea, ja 1 sanoi
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 449: So long shall this man see good days and live. Kauan tää mies voi hyvin ja elelee paxusti.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 464: So light a thing was this man, grown so great Niin kevyt paketti oli tämä mies, niin isoxi kasvanut
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 466: Blaze the armed man carven on his shield, and hear Nähdäxeen sen tatuoinnit, ja kuullaxeen
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 493: This I have also at heart; that not for me,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 549: ⁠That his strength might endure for a span
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 555: They breathed upon his mouth,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 556: ⁠They filled his body with life;
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 561: They gave him light in his ways,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 566: ⁠With his lips he travaileth;
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 567: In his heart is a blind desire,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 568: ⁠In his eyes foreknowledge of death;
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 582: That this great hunt with heroes for the hounds
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 651: And where Eurotas hollows his moist rock
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 690: Two-edged for fight as the axe against his arm,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 692: Full-sailed; him Cepheus follows, his twin-born,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 693: Chief name next his of all Arcadian men.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 703: The sail and oar of this Ætolian land,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 741: Yet is not less himself than his own law.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 753: Much, but not this, that each thing live its life.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 769: Child, if a man serve law through all his life
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 771: And with his whole heart worship, him all gods
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 772: Praise; but who loves it only with his lips,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 775: Him heaven infatuates and his twin-born fate
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 786: This doth she, being unloved; whom if one love,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 794: Till some discolouring stain dyes all his life,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 839: Eschewing embrace the luck of this thy life,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 852: Have the gods given his life in hand as thine?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 880: The gods have given this woman; hear thou these.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 887: But one thing I know surely, and cleave to this;
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 895: Submits himself, refraining all his heart.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 915: Stood out ahead from Colchis, and we heard
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 933: I saw not one thing like this one seen here,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 947: For what the hours have given is given, and this
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1005: I charge thee by thy soul and this my breast,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1034: For what thou art I know thee, and this thy breast
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1068: But Fate is the name of her; and his name is Death.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1133: ⁠Born with a man at his birth,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1218: ⁠Made moist with his mouth, and her breast
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1236: That bear a spear for spindle, and this bow strung
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1247: And make this day all golden, hers and ours,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1344: This beast before thee and no man halve with me
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1350: Men, and the chosen of all this people, and thou,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1367: Fame, and this armed and iron maidenhood,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1409: And this my maiden body, by all oaths
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1422: What thing is this for you to shout me down,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1423: What, for a man to grudge me this my life
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1441: Following his fate; exalt your hands and hearts,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1449: For in the word his life is and his breath,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1450: ⁠And in the word his death,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1548: ⁠When hast thou seen? or hast thou felt his breath
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1564: ⁠Who shakes the heaven as ashes in his hand;
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1610: ⁠That each man in his heart sigheth, and saith,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1668: Twice be thou too for my sake blest and his.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1712: Then Telamon his brother, and Argive-born
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1727: This way and that; but questing up and down
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1738: Through all his limbs, and launched a double dart.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1740: Too hot of spirit and feebler than his will,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1741: That his hand failed, though fervent; and the shaft,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1760: Hyleus; and sharp death caught his sudden soul,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1761: And violent sleep shed night upon his eyes.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1770: Amphiaraus; for his sacred shaft
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1783: Clamoured and crashed the fervour of his feet,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1787: Break, all the hard thews of his heaving limbs
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1797: Aimed on the left side his well-handled spear
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1800: Right in the hairiest hollow of his hide
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1803: The heavy horror with his hanging shafts
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1805: Foamed out the latest wrath of all his life.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1825: Good tidings to rejoice this town and thee.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1830: Laud ye the gods; for this they have given is good,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1904: ⁠For his heart was piteous
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1920: ⁠For this lightening of clear weather
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1952: Bow down, cry, wail for pity; is this a time
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2010: Know this then singly, by one hand they fell.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2030: Wert thou not called Meleager from this womb?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2090: That this might stand a wonder in Calydon,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2094: At female feet, saying This thy spoil not mine,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2096: And all this praise God gives thee: she thereat
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2111: Saying all we were despoiled by this one girl?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2118: Smote not nor heaved up hand; and this man first,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2119: Plexippus, crying out This for love’s sake, sweet,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2121: Pierced his cheek through; then Toxeus made for him,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2122: Dumb, but his spear spake; vain and violent words.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2124: The earth felt falling, and his horse’s foam
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2125: Blanched thy son’s face, his slayer; and these being slain,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2133: What say you, women? is all this not well done?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2146: For this man dead walked with me, child by child,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2148: With his own tender wrist and hand, and held
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2184: With mother-milk for honey? and this man too,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2185: Dead, with my son’s spear thrust between his sides,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2198: What life shall this be with my son, to know
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2221: And by hired hands while sleeping, this thing too
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2223: I had set my soul to suffer; or this hunt,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2224: Had this despatched them under tusk or tooth
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2227: And hands of swift gods following, all save this,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2279: This thing moves more than all things, even thy son,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2282: Reverencing most for thy sake all his gods.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2287: Not reverencing his gods nor mine own heart
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2289: But cruel, and in his ravin like a beast,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2301: Strengthen thy spirit; is this not also a god,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2313: And life, and this inexpiable impotence.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2337: Alas, for all this all men undergo.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2353: And in the dark this grieve Eurythemis,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2357: Worse than this grief. Yet how to atone at all
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2364: This love is deep, and natural to man's blood,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2389: And seeth his own dishonour intolerable.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2458: An end is come, an end; this is of God.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2560: Woman, what fire is this thou burnest with?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2568: For this thy face and hair are as one fire.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2600: Nay, but what thing is this thing thou hast done?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2628: O children, what is this ye see? your eyes
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2634: And of mine hands extinguished; this is he.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2641: I did this and I say this and I die.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2647: And in thy mouth has death set up his house.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2662: I that did this will weep not nor cry out,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2678: I am swollen with subsiding of his veins,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2679: I am flooded with his ebbing; my lit eyes
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2680: Flame with the falling fire that leaves his lids
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2682: Because his face is ashen. Yet, O child,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2703: My name is a consuming. From this time,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2777: Thaws from off all his body to the hair.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2798: First fallen; and he, grasping his own hair, groaned
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2799: And cast his raiment round his face and fell.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2807: But the king twitched his reins in and leapt down
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2821: Gasped, and his face waxed like as sunburnt grass.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2870: Who is this bending over thee, lord, with tears and suppression
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2892: ⁠Unto each man his fate;
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2956: ⁠Now this thing is done?
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3167: Of this my weary body—thou too, queen,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3186: And all this body a broken barren tree
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3187: That was so strong, and all this flower of life
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3196: Thee; but this death was mixed with all my life,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3197: Mine end with my beginning: and this law,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3198: This only, slays me, and not my mother at all.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3204: Slay and are slain for love’s sake; and this house
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3238: That were in Colchis with me, and bare down
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3243: Those days and this, and your own living souls,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3245: And by this miserable spoil, and me
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3264: Defile me to despise me, saying, This man
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3266: Through female fingers in his woof of life,
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3278: ⁠Who shall contend with his lords
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3310: VIHREÄSTÄ siirtymästä ja Putinin energia-aseesta muodostui yhdessä tilanne, jossa kuluttaja kauhistelee villasukat jalassa ja toppatakki päällä hurjia sähkölaskujaan. Eikä tässä kaikki. Ongelma kohtelee kuluttajia eri tavalla sen mukaan, millaisessa kodissa asuu ja millaisen sähkösopimuksen on tehnyt.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3368: France's Emmanuel Macron: 5 feet, 7 inches (173 cm). On his passport he had 1.77m listed for his height.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3372: Adolf Hitler's height 5ft 8 ½ (174 cm) in his socks.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3389: Serbia's Aleksandar Vucic stands tall at 6 foot 6, making him the tallest world leader. House 2021 Donald Trump weighed 244 pounds according to the results of a physical performed in June 2020. Speaker Nancy Pelosi insisted that he's morbidly obese. The president is 6-foot-3 inches tall. This means the once and future president is considered only clinically obese and has a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30.3.
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3391: Donald Trump is in his mid-70s and has lost around 1.5 inches of height since he was a young man, and stands at 6'0.5 (184.3 cm) tall today. During his prime years, however, he was comfortably taller, standing at 6'2" (188cm) for the majority of the day, and taller than 37 of the 45 elected American Presidents. Some have speculated that Barron Trump may stand at 6ft 7 inches tall, with many social media users saying that Trump's youngest son would be an ideal world leader!
    xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3393: Misinformation about Napoleon's height has been in circulation for hundreds of years. Although this famous military leader was measured at 5ft 2in, we know that he was actually around 5ft 7in tall! Exactly the same as President Macron!
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 119: Starkonkin tämän syksyn teos on avoin ja läheinen kertom, karje Be kaikesta siitä mitä Pentti Saarikoskelle tapahtu kaatokännissä 3 mauttoman keväisen viikon aikana Dublinis, Irials patalpage mes Joycen omassa kanpungtas. Pentu Saarikki haluaa kirjan alla olla oma izensä, vitun ärsyttävä, pala suunsa puhtasket, all hin kun Einen kristillinen puhe tehoa. Hinen tekstink on kanaa kulmicasta, Joskus his thin lapsellista, jodicus hän puhun kuin filof, multa aina hinen seuras on viihtyisää. Hän ei osa pilkata Jumala niinkö Hannu, eikä olla yhtä rivosuinen tai ilkeä, vaik miten yrittäisi. Hin kulkee mis kulkee baarikärpäsenä. Kirje femakolle on Sear nimiä ja tekstiä paljaimmillaan.


    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 248: Cary Grant saattoi olla juutalainen ja se todennäköisesti oli homo. Rooseveltin esi-isät saattoi olla juutalaisia Hollannissa. Claes Rosenvelt entered the cloth business in New York, and was married in 1682. He accumulated a fortune. He then changed his name to Nicholas Roosevelt. Of his four sons, Isaac died young. Nicholas married Sarah Solomons. Jacobus married Catherina Hardenburg. The Roosevelts were not a fighting but a peace-loving people, devoted to trade. Isaac became a capitalist. He founded the Bank of New York in 1790.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 254: Norman Corwin was Jewish, and his parents observed Judaism (his father, Sam Corwin, attended holiday services until his death at 110). While not an observant Jew, Corwin infused much of his work with the ideas of the Hebrew Prophets. One of the prayerbooks of American Reform Judaism, Shaarei Tefila: Gates of Prayer, contains a portion of the Prayer from the finale of Corwin's On a Note of Triumph (see link to full text below). Corwin was among the first producers to regularly use entertainment – even light entertainment – to tackle serious social issues.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 263: Sirri Härölän jouzenlaulu oli teos Jeesus Enkelinpoika Nasaretilainen, aika samantyyppinen kirja kuin aikaisemmin lukemamme evankeliumi-fanifiktio. Jännä miten samanlaisia EFK-versioita kynäilijät on Jeesuxesta kehitelleet. Selkeästi panokohtauxet on ollut suurin puute evankeliumeissa. Harri vetää gospelien mutkat suorixi, samastaa Magdalan ja Betanian Maariat. Jeesus tekee Magdaleenan kanssa perettä kuin sen yhden bestselleristin tiiliskivessä, annas olla se on kielen päällä, juu Dan Brownin Leonardo da Vinci koodi. There, Teabing explains that the Grail is not a cup, but connected to Mary Magdalene, and that she was Jesus Christ's wife and is the person to his right in The Last Supper. The hidden sarcophagus of Maria M. is in Louvre. No meat left in it, I fear.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 280: Pieni tovi ehtii kulua näistä mieltä kiihtävistä näyistä, niin eipä aikaakaan niin voi kauhistus! Jeesuxen sormi lipsahti vahingossa suoraan Maarian paisuneeseen litimärkään häpykieleen.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 338: Arkkipiispa Martti Simojoki piti puolestaan 11. marraskuuta 1964 kansanopistolaitoksen 75-vuotisjuhlassa Helsingin yliopistolla puheen, jossa hän tuomitsi Hannu Salaman ja kirjan kustantajan. Hän korosti, että pyhistä asioista ei saanut puhua loukkaavalla tavalla, koska silloin pilkattiin ihmiseksi kasvamisen perusasioita. Ullanlinnan "Bobin" vaimo oli kasvanut ihmisenä niin ettei "Bob" saanut sitä heivatuxi Volvon perälle.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 387: Sodan aikana ja heti sotien jälkeen avioliittojen, avioerojen ja eronneiden vihkimisten määrä kasvoi. Kirkonmiehissä tämä sai aikaan moraalisen paniikin. Kirkko vihkimällä ”syntikumppanit” uuteen avioliittoon sulkee näiltä paluutien parannukseen. Martti Simojoki kannatti ehdottomasti vihkikieltoa. Paasikivi torppasi. Martti Simojoki vastusti ehdottomasti Hannu Salamaa. Urkki torppasi. Bugger it!
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 468: Mutta toinen vielä parempi on Etelä-Afrikan valkoiset, ne ovat kamalan pahoja eivätkä yhtä ilmiselvästi CIAn asialla. (Vaikka ovathan ne.) ULAG on niinkö GULAG ilman sitä geetä. Glavnoye Upravleniye Ispravitelno-Trudovykh Lagerey, paizi ei glavnoje. Sissejä on noin komppanian verran, mukana kuriositeettina 2 neekeriä, 1 jutku ja 1 ruåzalainen. Myös ruåzinlautalla seilaavat lautakätiset japsut ovat hyvin, hyvin pahoja. Ja tylsiä kun pelaavat koko ajan keskenään go-peliä. Heinrich Heydrichillä oli juutalainen isoäitipuoli mutta isot Ht antoivat sen anteexi koska Heydrichissä ei ollut yhtään mummipuolen verta. Ruth Solomonsson kuulostaa kyllä juutalaiselta, mutta ei välttämättä ole. Kurt Salomonson oli Perssonin kaveri, kiirunalainen työläiskirjailija joka reeasi työväen asiaa kapitalisteille. Onkohan Ruthilla Heydrichiä nussiessa päässä blondi peruukki niinkuin sillä yhdellä brittinaziryhmään soluttautuneella Rahitilla? Tai Pena Saarikosken Tuula2 vaimolla Urkin juhlissa? Vaikka se oli blondi ilmankin.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 473: Kyseessä oli yksi sotilashistorian lyhyimmistä ja ehkä naurettavimmista operaatioista. Tanskan asevoimien vastarinta kesti vain muutaman tunnin.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 529: It is very hard to determine, given the facts at hand, whether or not MacArthur would have been right in dropping 30 nuclear bombs on China. I will say this, though; the rose-colored glasses of the present often change the shading of situations in the past. When you consider the decisions of MacArthur and Truman, remember that they lived in a different time with different values and ideas. And don't be afraid to make up your own mind.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 543: Tällänen uni pyöri viime yönä ahistavasti päässä. Wells ja Fargo saa postimonopolin jännittävän kilpajuoxun tuloxena ja karhunpojat rikastuvat sikana. Kultakuljetuxia postivaunuilla Californian tulenhehkuvan taivaan alla kultaryntäyxen aikana, Wells Fargon miehet laukovat 6sti laukeavia, konnat ja punanahat puree verisinä pölyä. Wells ja Fargo menevät poneilla ja vinguttavat American Express kortteja.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 545: Loppuvizinä Wells tai Fargo on Skotlannissa käymässä kengänkiillottaja-ankanpojan asiakkaana ja heittää ankanpojalle dimen sanoen Go West young man. Poika lähtee osallistumaan Alaskan kultaryntäyxeen. Loppu on (ouch-klicheet viiltävät) historiaa.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 557: Ruåzalaiset saa jotain viboja törkyisistä tyypeistä. Eikä vaan ruåzalaiset vaan muutkin teeveekazojat. Ihanaa vaikka hirveää. Krimeissä on törkyisiä tyyppejä ja miljöitä tuplasti enemmän kuin tavallisia, loput on jotain ökyrikkaita. On kiva nähdä miten toinen puoli elää. Saa pöyhistyä ja pöyristyä. Ei 12-vuotias kissa ole erityisen vanha. Viiru oli yli 20 kun se katosi. Eikä kissat elä maidolla. Eikä pyrppäävä Braxen naurata uusintana.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 563: Pääpahis Reinhard Heydt pelasi sisilialaisen avauksen Marshall- muunnosta, nerokasta peliä, jonka muuan amerikkalainen merikapteeni oli keksinyt ja sittemmin tehnyt useista sen ajan suurista mestareista häviäjiä, jotka eivät voineet juuri muuta kuin haukkoa henkeä hämmästyksestä. Suuria linjoja, rohkea panoksia, koko jutussa oli miltei hitusen Weserübungin makua.
    xxx/ellauri252.html on line 567: The Marshall Attack is an aggressive line in the Ruy Lopez, where Black sacrifices a pawn by playing d5 to gain initiative and a kingside attack. Frank Marshall famously debuted it in his game against José Raúl Capablanca in 1918. Marshall lost the game. White wins in well over half the plays.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 54: Ilkka Remeksen kirjoissa Venäjä on usein pahis: ”Venäjä on teoillaan ja puheillaan huolehtinut itsensä demonisoinnista”. Ilkka Remeksen uutuuskirjassa Venäjä katkaisee Suomelta sähköt.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 61: Venäjä, Venäjä, Venäjä. Ilkka Remes ei vihjaile, vaan osoittaa sormellaan suoraan itärajalle. Hornan ja Jäätyvän helvetin pahis on suuri ja mahtava naapurimaamme, jonka uhittelu on kohdistunut viime aikoina Suomeenkin esimerkiksi ilmatilaloukkausten muodossa. Jo 15 vuotta sitten silloinen ulkoministeri Erkki Tuomioja paheksui nettisivuillaan sitä, että Remeksen neljässä ensimmäisessä romaanissa kaikki mahdollinen pahuus liittyi Venäjään ja venäläisiin.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 78: Suomen 1990-luvun alun lama oli talousvaikutuksiltaan Suomen historian pahimpia talouskriisejä, pahempi kuin 1930-luvun lama Suomessa. Vuosien 1990–1993 lamalla oli syvä vaikutus koko 1990-luvun Suomen talouteen (erityisesti työttömyyteen), kulttuuriin, politiikkaan ja ilmapiiriin. Sen aikana bruttokansantuote laski 13 prosenttia ja työttömyys nousi 3,5 prosentista 18,9 prosenttiin.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 90: The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 led to a 70% drop in trade with Russia and eventually Finland was forced to devaluate, which increased the private sector's foreign currency denominated debt burden. At the same time authorities tightened bank supervision and prudential regulation, lending dropped by 25% and asset prices halved. Combined with raising savings rate and worldwide economic troubles, this led to a sharp drop of aggregate demand and a wave of bankruptcies. Credit losses mounted and a banking crisis inevitability followed. The number of companies went down by 15%, real GDP contracted about 14% and unemployment rose from 3% to nearly 20% in four years.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 94: Johtotähtenä 1990-luvun alun lamasta nousemisessa oli matkapuhelinjätti Nokia, joka veti mukanaan muutakin taloutta ylöspäin. Hyi helvetti. At its peak in 2000, during the telecoms bubble, Nokia accounted for 4% of the country's GDP, 21% of total exports, and 70% of the Helsinki Stock Exchange market capital. position, becoming the first non-Finnish director in Nokia's history.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 101: The Soviet Union's last year of economic growth was 1989, and throughout the 1990s, recession ensued in the Former Soviet Republics. In May 1998, following the 1997 crash of the East Asian economy, things began to get even worse in Russia. In August 1998, the value of the ruble fell 34% and people clamored to get their money out of banks (see 1998 Russian financial crisis). The government acted by dragging its feet on privatization programs. Russians responded to this situation with approval by electing the more pro-dirigist and less liberal Vladimir Putin as President in 2000. Putin proceeded to reassert the role of the federal government, and gave it power it had not seen since the Soviet era. State-run businesses were used to out-compete some of the more wealthy rivals of Putin. Putin's policies were popular with the Russian people, gaining him re-election in 2004. At the same time, the export-oriented Russian economy enjoyed considerable influx of foreign currency thanks to rising worldwide oil prices (from $15 per barrel in early 1999 to an average of $30 per barrel during Putin's first term). The early 2000s recession was avoided in Russia due to rebound in exports and, to some degree, a return to dirigism.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 109: The United States housing bubble burst in 2005–2012.When housing prices fell and homeowners began to abandon their mortgages, the value of mortgage-backed securities held by investment banks declined in 2007–2008, causing several to collapse or be bailed out in September 2008. This 2007–2008 phase was called the subprime mortgage crisis.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 131: During a period of strong global growth, growing capital flows, and prolonged stability earlier this decade, market participants sought higher yields without an adequate appreciation of the risks and failed to exercise proper due diligence. At the same time, weak underwriting standards, unsound risk management practices, increasingly complex and opaque financial products, and consequent excessive leverage combined to create vulnerabilities in the system.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 138:

    Some kuhisee Aki Kaurismäen haastattelusta


    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 206: Jukka jonka naamakin on "malli Cajander" sitoi maalintuoxuisia kengännauhoja briteissä. Hänellä oli pienikokoinen mutta jäntevä. Hän liikkui nopeasti, puhui nopeasti, ajatteli nopeasti ja tuli aivan liian nopeasti, Susanin kannalta. Susan oli vastustanut talon ostamista mutta "Jukka" oli pitänyt päänsä. "Yucca" otti liikaa asuntolainaa, nyt on lama jälleen ovella. "Yucca" oli energinen häirikkö, karu puurtaja. Seisoma-asento paljasti sammareihin kuluneet molo- ja munapussit. Ylihintaisessa talossa oli muutama Ikean laadukkaamman sarjan huonekalu. Häh onko sellaisia muka? Susan turhautui kotona ja kaipasi töihin mutta "Yucca" halusi sen hoitavan poikia. Tarvittaessa rahaa ja kulttuuripääomaa riitti vaikka mihin. "Yucca" puolestaan on onneton rotinkainen persu. Vizi exe älyä että Kekkoslovakiassa sen ei tarviis välittää tollasista luokkaeroista. Pitkä ja harteikas Tony Stewart päihittää "Yucca"n squashissa toinen käsi selän takana ja varrastaa sen vaimoa sen selän takana. Antero tunsi inhonväreitä jo etukäteen. Miten nää VOI olla näin klisheisiä? Näin kerta kaikkiaan läpipaskoja?
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 237: "Yucca" pomppasi laverilta kuin jousi. "Vemärni?" "Yucca"n ruåzinkielinen puhe oli nopeaa kuin konzarin papatus. "Yucca" tee mitä ne pyytävät, Susan tohisi VHS-videolla Tonyn toukka kohdussa.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 259: Pääkallokehrääjä on olematon perhoslaji. Se on vaihtoehtohistoria toisenlaisesta Suomesta. Tässä spekulatiivisessa fiktiossa (spefi) Suomen demokraattinen tasavalta on kuulunut osana Neuvostoliiton itäblokkiin kesäkuusta 1944 lähtien, jolloin neuvostojoukot miehittivät Suomen jatkosodan päätteeksi. Sosialistisessa Suomessa Leininintien varteen pysäköidyt autot ovat Ladoja ja Otto-Ville Kuusisen jättipatsas vartioi postitaloa, joka on vanhaan tapaan Heikinkadulla. Epämiellyttävä valkokenraali on lakaistu vittuun. Eletään vuotta 1986, kun kansainväliset tapahtumat käynnistyvät. Kreml saa viestin vetää puna-armeijan joukkonsa välittömästi pois Suomesta. Uhkaus vahvistuu vakavaksi ja todelliseksi. Suurvallan turvallisuuskoneisto käynnistyy täydellä teholla, sillä Sininen Armeijakunta -niminen terroristiryhmittymä aikoo tehdä Suomessa demilitarisaation.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 287: Ervasti haikaili suomalaista köyhyyttä. Hän oli huolissaan ruotsalaisesta yhteiskunnasta, jossa kaupoissa kuljeskeleminen oli monille ihmisille keskeisin vapaa-ajan harrastus. Energiaa ja tekemisen tarvetta purettiin ostosten tekemiseen, aikaa kulutettiin kauppakeskusten ravintoloissa ja kahviloissa. Ervastin vakaumuksen mukaan ihminen sai elämälleen jännitteen vastakohdista kuten työmaavarkauxista, murhista, terrorismista ja oikeistoaktivismista. Ruotsalaisten elämässä huippukohdat ja pohjakosketuxet oli kadonneet. Kaikki oli samaa paa-aas-kaa. Ilon ja surun, onnen ja onnettomuuden välimatka oli kutistunut. Elämän luonnolliset vastakohdat oli kantaväestöltä poistettu. Kaikki oli kantapeikoille liian helppoa, minkään eteen ei tarvinut ponnistella, tavaraa ja mutiaisten palveluita oli liikaa. Puutteen myötä oli kadonnut kyky nauttia elämän yksinkertaisista iloista kuten alaikäisten muslimien väkisin panosta. Pahinta oli lapsilla ja nuorilla, jotka saivat elämässään valmiina kaiken mitä halusivat, omaa ponnistelua ei tarvittu ja aika käytettiin musiikin kuunteluun, television katsomiseen, puhelimella oloon, koulukiusaamiseen ja kaduilla ja kaupoissa maleksimiseen. Vaihtelu piti hakea keinotekoisesta viihteestä, kuluttamisesta, alkoholista, huumeista. Pientenkin ruotsalaisten maalaiskaupunkien kaduilla näkyi viikonloppuiltoina 12-vuotiaita juopuneita, aggressiivisia lapsia puukot käsissä.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 372: Vapaus ei ollut Heikille ainoastaan äärioikeistolaisten fraseologiaa, vaan myös hegeliläistä idealismia seisomassa päällään. Kaukaa aroilta kuikkii Iivana Julman haamu. Verta on näkevä aamu. Heikki lyyhistyi äiskän kirjepinon päälle. Sekä tässä nyt on kaikkein traagisinta? Vitun pelle.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 386: Ei hemmetti rotat karkaavat nyt joka laivasta. Sieppaaja lysähti rohisten lattialle. Pekka sanoi mies. Laura iski häntä kaikin voimin tiilellä takaraivoon. Hänen olisi pitänyt tappaa hajunsieppaajat kellariin, mutteihän pystynyt. Oza oli liian pipi kipä. Meilläkin on kellarissa putki ikävästi ozan tasalla. Jukankin kasvojen poikamainen tuoreus oli poissa. Alexin persche on yhä kurainen. Tony koittaa piilotella jättimäistä slabaa Jukan kazeilta.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 455: Mix vitussa ryssien siirajoukkue Alfa on "pahamaineinen" toisin kuin länkkärien vastaavat erinimiset tappomiehistöt? No sixkoska tää Unski on vahvasti länkkärien leirissä.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 491: Antero pureskelee kynsiä. Marja roikkui hänen ajatuxissaan hoikkana ja jäntevänä ja pillunhajuisena. Kalevi ei ollut kuollut turhaan. Kalevin kuolemasta oli paljonkin hyötyä. Holmstenin kauhistuneet ja ennen kaikkea hikiset kasvot hohtivat.
    xxx/ellauri253.html on line 498: "This is Ronald Reagan can you hear me?" Ronald McDonald suhisi proteesinsa läpitte. Mixi jenkkityperyxet luulevat että suomalaisten englanti on laulavaa? Izehän ne mankuvat kuin rikkinäinen sähkökitara.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 73: Hän tarkisti jälleen konepistoolinsa, asetti sen osoittamaan luolan suuaukolle, ja nukahti nopeasti. Aamun saadessa hän nousi, verrytteli, loi katseen ympärilleen ja jatkoi matkaansa. Silmät tarkkailivat maastoa kuin haukan silmät myyriäisistä kihisevää peltoa. Sormet kutisivat liipaisimella.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 78: "... tuossa kuoli isä", kähisi yksi eläkeläisistä osoittaen tienpenkkaa, "ampui aivot Tarvanaisen Jaskan silmille..."
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 83: Mannergeim katseli näytelmää kiinnostunena ja kirjoitti muistiinpanoja repaleiseen vihkoonsa. Taas näitä! Mielenkiintoisia hahmoja, selvästi kiinnostuneita historiasta mutta kykenemättömiä ajattelemaan pitkällä tähtäimellä. Marski luikerteli pian taaksepäin ja katosi tiheään viitaan kuten okapi katoaa Kongon viidakkoon bantupygmien katsellessa huuli pyöreänä perään.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 92: With the world’s attention fixed firmly on the invasion of Ukraine, Antony Pyp Pipo’s new history of Russia’s 1917 revolutions and subsequent civil war is especially timely. He explains to Rob Attaboy how the fall of the last tsar launched a chain of events leading to millions of deaths and one of history’s most brutal dictatorships! Lähde: historyextra.com/period/20th-century/russia-civil-war-why-causes/">History Extra
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 96: The stage was set for a civil war between the Bolshevik Red Army and their “White” enemies that devastated the country and led to millions of deaths. Several international powers also contributed troops and supplies to the conflict, predominantly to the Bolsheviks’ opponents. (Note the similarity to Ukraina today!) In 1919, White armies led by Generals Kolchak and Denikin launched offensives that seemed set to destroy the fledgling communist regime, but the Red Army managed to repel them. Following those triumphs the Bolsheviks were eventually able to achieve ultimate victory, though fighting continued for many more months. It looks like this history is just now repeating itself and in just the same place too, fascist Ukraina!
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 98: The most important thing for me was to understand the chain of disasters of the 20th century – the impacts of which actually are still with us today, as we see in Ukraine. Around 12 million people died in the Russian Civil War. This wanton destruction created a terrible fear among the middle classes, but also galvanised the left – the Bolsheviks and other communists – and marked the start of a vicious circle of rhetoric that developed, above all, in the 1930s. This is really what dominates the whole of the 20th century, yet I think that the Russian Civil War is not understood well enough, nor is the demilitarisation of Ukraine.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 111: This was exactly what Lenin and the Bolsheviks needed. The upsurge of chaotic violence was actually bulldozing a way through for the Bolsheviks to seize power, because the liberals were incapable (and actually unwilling) to do anything about it. What Lenin perceived – and he was absolutely right – was that the success of a coup depends on the apathy of the majority, not on how many real supporters you have. Trump and Bolsonaro made the same observation.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 113: Even many Bolsheviks were shocked by Lenin’s extremism. His new government abolished the police and the army, replacing them with Red Guards from the factories, and absolutely everything was nationalised! How indecent! This course of action wasn’t apparent beforehand, and – not surprisingly since they lost their jobs and status – many of the civil servants didn’t want to work with the new government.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 116: Lenin actually wanted the civil war. He said: “Civil war is the sharpest form of the class struggle.” In his view, it was the only way for the Bolsheviks to take power. So what? It has been just the Same in all previous revolutions. Those in the power do not just give it away for free.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 122: There was always going to be tension right from the start, because most of these White officers were anti-Semitic – and there were many Jews in the Socialist Revolutionaries and other socialist parties. White officers also wanted to bring back the punishments used by the tsarist army, which meant that they would be allowed to punch soldiers in the face on a summary charge, whip them using rifle-cleaning rods, things like that. Of course, this created a terrible tension the whole time.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 124: Antony James Pyp Pipo on brittiläinen historioitsija ja kirjailija. Hän on kirjoittanut lukuisia elämäkertoja ja teoksia toisesta maailmansodasta ja Espanjan sisällissodasta. Pyp Pipon tunnetuimmat julkaisut ovat Stalingrad ja Berliini 1945. Pyp Pipo on ollut aiemmin sotilas.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 130: This was almost as unpopular as the Whites’ appalling social policies towards the peasants. The tsarists wanted to get all their land back from the peasants, which of course was going to create a tremendous hatred and fear; as a result, there was almost continual war. The Whites had no proper administration; all they were interested in was taking what they could from these local areas, including food – which in many cases they did not pay for. One almost thinks that the Bolsheviks were onto something there.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 134: Antony Pyp Pipo: Their commitment was unclear, and this was always the problem: they couldn’t make up their own minds. In the early part of 1919, US president Woodrow Wilson thought that some form of peace could be achieved in Russia, and suggested a conference to be held in the Princes’ Islands lying in the Sea of Marmara close to Constantinople [now Istanbul]. However, the Whites were so furious at the Reds and what had happened up till then – the murders of the aristocracy, the destruction and so on – that they refused to sit down with the Reds. And Lenin and the Bolsheviks – who at that stage thought that they were going to win the war (as they did) – had no intention of sitting down with them, let alone the motherfucking Anglo Saxons meddling everywhere with just their own "vital interests" in mind.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 141: The British eventually landed only a couple of battalions – of the Middlesex Regiment and the Hampshire Regiment. All too little! This time round we gotta send Harry Windsor with a division of chess pieces, plus Meghan Markle on the off chance that she gets shot.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 143: But there were also Italians, there were Serbs, there were Greeks and then the French, who came into Odessa and into the Black Sea region. But this actually proved to be a disaster, because so many of their troops were politicised and were much more sympathetic towards the Bolsheviks than they were towards their own officers. Haha!
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 154: Churchill, then British secretary of state for war, couldn’t believe what had happened. He was sending signals to General Holman, commander of the British military mission, saying: “I can’t believe this. The Reds were in full retreat, and now suddenly they seem to be beating the Whites on every front. What’s happened?” He’d failed to understand that it was purely because the Bolsheviks had reinforced that eastern front at a crucial moment, then – with the advantage of their just cause – been able to bring troops back very rapidly to transform the whole situation.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 158: Antony Pyp Pipo: The Russian Civil War was really the moment when Ukraine started to become a separate entity from Russia, all thanks to Lenin. There wasn't much of malorussian culture in the countryside, mostly some boring poetry and balalaika music. But at this time they finally had a chance to get rid of the Turks and Poles, and to take Ukraine back to the fold of the great east slavonic commonwealth, by joining the USSR and their Big Brother– and they’d been given the opportunity. But they botched it completely when the USSR collapsed. That is when they went back to fraternize with the West and develop a more modern nazism with Nato.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 160: This is what Putin has been raging about: it was Lenin who gave Ukraine its autonomy at that stage. The Bolsheviks thought that allowing a certain amount of autonomy or independence to these former nation states of the Russian empire would cause no problems, because the forthcoming world revolution would bring those states back under communist control – and that’s where they made their great mistake. They did not count on the wily Westerners to come sneaking in with their Coke and burger laissez faire and tease away the little bro.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 180: Jutku-Marxille kiukustunut Bakunin päästeli aika pahanlaatuista salaliittoteoriaa. "the communism of Marx wants a mighty centralization by the state, and where this exists there must nowadays be a central State Bank and where such a bank exists, the parasitical Jewish nation, which speculates on the labor of the peoples, will always find a means to sustain itself. This whole Jewish world, comprising a single exploiting sect, a kind of bloodsucking people, a kind of organic destructive collective parasite, going beyond not only the frontiers of states, but of political opinion, this world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other."
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 213: Vielä yxi tomera nainen, lannistumaton historioitsija Natalia Mihailovna Pirumova (1923–1997), pelasti suuren osan Bakuninin ja Kropotkinin teoksista huolimatta niiden epäselvyydestä.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 218: Em. suspektin "historioitsija" Antony Pyp Pipon mukaan Durruti kuoli sisällissodassa omiensa vahingonlaukaukseen, mikä on takuulla taas vaan pelkkää brittipanettelua. Älä usko brittejä pitemmälle kuin jaxat heittää ne.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 367: He said that purchasing Gazprom shares was an investment in the Russian economy, and the desire to influence the Gazprom management was driven by the need to expose a "huge fraud going on at the company". However, at the time it was illegal for foreigners to buy Gazprom shares in Russia, and he did it through shell companies that hid his ownership. He also said that the scheme of using Russian-registered subsidiaries entitled to tax advantages was practised by other foreign investors at the time and was not illegal. Vedä käteen luihu luikuri!
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 369: Bowder could not be arrested by Interpol because they said this was "a political case." Compare to the sad fate of Assange, joka sentään oli vain pilliinviheltäjä, ei niljainen konna kuten Browder.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 463: Parikymmentä vuotta yhteisö eli hiljaisuudessa huolehtien sotaorvoiksi jääneistä, viljeltiin maata ja hoidettiin karjaa lähistön viljelijöiden kanssa perustetussa tuottajaosuuskunnassa. Paikallinen katolinen kirkko antoi protestanttiveljille luvan pitää kirkossa omia jumalanpalveluksiaan, kunnes 1960-luvulla rakennettiin oma kirkko saksalaisnuorten talkoovoimin. 1970-luvulle tultaessa veljestön lukumäärä oli jo noin 70 ja vuosikymmentä myöhemmin noin sata. Osa heistä työskenteli yhteisön tiloissa, osa esimerkiksi lääkärinä, opettajina ja insinööreinä lähiseudulla. 1970-luvulla mukaan alkoi tulla myös katolisia nuoria miehiä.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 475: Buslajev on fiktiivinen novgorodilainen supermies. Travelling down the great rivers of Russia, Vasili and his band subjugated the Finns, the Mongols and most of the people around the Caspian Sea. Varmaan alistivat vähävenäläiset myös. Volga laskee Kaspian eli Hyrkanian mereen. Don, skyyttien Tanais, laskee Asovan mereen eli Maiotixeen. Donin kautta on kanavayhteys Volgalle. The Scythian name for the Volga was Rahā, also literally meaning 'wetness'. Buslajev kuoli hypättyään päälleen liian ison kiven yli, käydessään Jordanissa naku-uinnilla.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 479: »Gumanismi siinä muodossaan, kuin me olemme sen omaksuneet evankeliumista ja Venäjän kansan elämää käsittelevistä taiteilijoidemme pyhistä kirjoituksista on kehnoa gumanismia, ja A. A. Blok taisi olla ainoa, joka oli vähällä ymmärtää sen.» Lohkaisi Gorki.
    xxx/ellauri255.html on line 559: Ei ole kahta henkilöä, jotka olisivat niin kaukana toisistaan kuin Gabriel Marques ja Jorma Ojaharju. Marques syntyi kultalusikka suussa, asui äitinsä kartanossa, opiskeli lakia ja alkoi toimittajana seikkailla Euroopassa, vietti aikaa Fidel Castron sohvamopsina Havannassa ja sai ylimääräisen kuhmun nenäänsä ällöttävän Mario Vargas Llosan nyrkistä. Ainostaan tuo kirjallisuushistorian kuuluisin nyrkkitappelu yhdistää nämä kaksi ihmistä toisiinsa. Ojaharju sai vain nyrkiniskuja enemmän, mutta ei fellow nobelisteilta.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 67: Suomen historia ja kulttuuri on pääosaltaan Suomen kansan erikoisluonteen muovaava. Kalevala, sotakorvaukset, arkkitehtuuri ja Breitenfeldin voitto ovat suomalaisen hengen saavutuksia. Se, että olemme yhä suomalaisia talvi- ja jatkosodan jälkeen, ei ole pelkkää moukan tuuria. Nämä voitot on saavuttanut Suomen mies, tuo hakkapeliitta.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 77: Suomalainen tuntee, miten Jumala on häntä johdattanut halki myrskyisen historian. Hän näkee, miten vielä itsenäisyytemme aikanakin olemme saaneet oikean miehen oikealla hetkellä: Svinhufvudin silloin, kun lakien kunnioitus oli heikkenemässä, Rytin silloin, kun tarvittiin kansallista ryhtiä, Mannerheimin puolustustahdon voimistamista tarvittaessa, Paasikiven silloin, kun maa oli vielä neuvotteluin pelastettavissa. Siksi suomalainen uskoo oikeistojohtajiin kuin Jumalaan. Hän voi olla fasisti, herännyt tai miltei -ajattelija, hän voi olla sosialidemokraatti tai jopa ruotsinkielisen sivistyneistön etuja puolustava, mutta jonkinlainen jumala ja isänmaa hänellä on, ellei ole kommari ja maanpetturi.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 99: Pitääkö olla huolissaan? - katso maksutta MTV Katsomossa. Kuolleisuudessa jättikasvu ja syntyvyydessä historiallisen syvä pudotus - pitääkö olla huolissaan? Miten menetellä syntyvyyden kohentamisexi? Asiantuntijat näyttävät. 19min 39 minuuttia sitten. Tällaista keskustelua Suomessa käydään Turkista - pilapiirrokset nousivat keskusteluihin ja riemu kattoon. Tulkaa kattoon kattoon kun Kari Hotakaisen pärstä jäädytetään kattoon. Luvassa on jälleen kymmeniä paikallaanolokohtauksia. Hotakainen on ihme rupusakin pyllynnuolija, mainosmiehenä se miettii koko ajan mikä uppoaisi laahuxeen, miten sitä voi vaivihkaisesti vähän mielistellä, että myynti paranisi.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 231: Annettu kuva on köysi, jota erehdytään puolipimeässä luulemaan vällykäärmeeksi. Tämän maailman käärme pelottaa meitä. Se tulee jopa uniimme. Mikä on ratkaisu? Tuo valoa ja näet sen todellisen luonteen. Se on vain köysi, sanoo fakiiri ja kiipeää sitä pitkin taivaaseen kuin kissa tikapuita. Samoin tämän maailman todellinen luonne tai olemus on yksin jumalallisuus. Tuo hengellisen viisauden valoa joogan avulla, niin näet Jumalan yksin kaikkialla. Tämä on henkistä vapautta tai vapautumista, moksha. Et ole mokshishkaan. Kun tämä tieto valkenee, on täydellinen tyytyväisyys; mieleen ei jää haluja, eikä enää jää uudestisyntymisen sysäystä. Vaikka toisaalta, kyllä se sysäyskin on huisin kiva. Mukavasti jotmuilee lingam Sarin sisällä.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 283: atman (n.) hindulaisessa filosofiassa itse tai sielu, 1785, sanskritin kielestä atma"ize, hengitys, sielu", PIE:ltä* etmen "hengitys". Juuri löytyy sanskritista ja germaanista; myös vanhan englannin æðm, Hollannin kieli adem, vanha yläsaksa atum "hengitys", vanha englanti eþian, Hollannin kieli ademen"hengittää". Niin kauan kuin henki kulkee henki kulkee, kun henki loppuu loppuu peli, GAME OVER. Henki ei pihise, ei tässä eikä missään muualla.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 334: Nirvāṇa (/nɪərˈvɑːnə/ neer-VAH-nə, /-ˈvænə/ -VAN-ə, /nɜːr-/ nur-; Sanskritiksi: निर्वाण nirvāṇa [nɪɽʋaːɳɐ]; Pali: nibbāna; Prakrit: ṇivvāṇa; kirjaimellisesti "puhallettu", kuten öljylampussa) on intian uskontojen (buddhalaisuus, hindulaisuus, jainismi ja sikhismi) käsite, joka edustaa pelastusopillisen vapautumisen lopullista tilaa, vapautumista duḥkhasta ja saṃsārasta. Hindu- ja buddhalaisjohtajat haluavat New Yorkin panimon muuttavan Nirvana IPAnsa nimen valittaen, että nimimerkki on epäkunnioittava heidän uskomuksiaan kohtaan. Samsara-leipomo on myös ikävä, mutta vähemmän loukkaava.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 520: Siinä oli meitä poikia, Jari Tervo, Kimmo Oksanen, Paula Rintamaa, Jukka Mauno, Hilkka Oksama ja Touko Siltala. (Tytöille ei ole wikisivuja.) Yksi helmistä oli kotimaisen kirjallisuuden lehtori Pentti Lyly. Hän oli ikäpolvea, joka arvosti huolellista pukeutumista. Jos ilmassa oli vähänkään kosteutta, niin Lylyllä oli kalossit. Muistan edelleen hänen kalosseistaan tulleen sihisevän läpsyttävän äänen. Hän riisui ne arvokkaasti salin edessä, katsahti meitä opiskelijoita ja katsoi sitten yliopiston päärakennuksen isoista ikkunoista ulos ja otti mietteliään ilmeen ennen kuin kertoi päivän teemana olevan Otto Mannisen lyriikan erityispiirteet. Tämä kuulostaa sketsiltä, mutta minusta tuo kaikki oli äärimmäisen hassua. Että voi todellakin olla olemassa aristokatteja, joilla on aikaa ja varaa perehtyä tämmöiseen paskaan ja halua jakaa vielä siitä tietoa meille perusopiskelijoille.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 526: Miltei kaikki vaikuttajat ovat aloittaneet Savon Sanomien kesätoimittajina, mainitaxemme 9 nimestä vain Lasse Lehtisen, Timo TA Mikkosen, Lenita Airiston, Johanna Raunion, Kristina Carlsonin ja Hotakaisen Karin. Lehtisen isä Allan oli palopäällikkö Kuopiossa, missä Lehtinen kävi koulunsa vuosina 1957–1965. Lehtinen väitteli filosofian tohtoriksi (poliittinen historia) vuonna 2002 Oulun yliopistossa. Väitöskirjan Aatosta jaloa ja alhaista mieltä. SDP:n ja Urho Kekkosen suhteet 1944–1981 tieteellinen taso "herätti keskustelua". Muun muassa dosentti Juhani Suomi oli sitä mieltä, ettei teos täyttänyt väitöskirjan vaatimuksia. Puolueensa oikean laidan kulkijana Lehtinen ei ollut koskaan puheenjohtaja Kalevi Sorsan suosiossa. Hän käsikirjoitti Hyvät herrat -tv-sarjaa yhdessä Aarno Laitisen kanssa. Lehtinen on myös juontanut Haluatko miljonääriksi? -televisio-ohjelmaa vuosina 1999–2005.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 593: Sønderjylland oder Süderjütland bezeichnet geographisch den Südteil der jütischen Halbinsel. Historisch betrachtet ist Süderjütland eine dänische Bezeichnung für das Gebiet, auf dem sich das Herzogtum Schleswig entwickelte. Dieses reichte von der Eider bis an die Königsau (dänisch Kongeå).
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 598: Infolge der 1920 durchgeführten Volksabstimmung in Schleswig, bei der über die nationale Zugehörigkeit zu Dänemark oder Deutschland entschieden wurde, fiel der Nordteil des Landesteils (Nordschleswig) an Dänemark, der Südteil (Südschleswig) blieb bei Deutschland. Auch wenn Sønderjylland und Schleswig historisch die gleiche Region bezeichnen, setzte sich nach 1920 im Sprachgebrauch der Bevölkerung allmählich der Begriff Sønderjylland für das Gebiet zwischen der Königsau (als Grenze zu Nørrejylland) und der heutigen deutsch-dänischen Grenze durch.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 611: Dänemark führte 1970 eine Verwaltungsgebietsreform durch. Die vier Kreise Tønder Amt (dt.: Amt Tondern), Sønderborg Amt (dt.: Amt Sonderburg), Aabenraa Amt (dt.: Amt Apenrade) und Haderslev Amt (dt.: Amt Hadersleben) wurden zu Sønderjyllands Amt zusammengefasst. 2007 verwischte eine neue Kommunalgebietsreform die historisch bedingten Verwaltungsgrenzen. Sønderjyllands Amt wurde Teil der Region Syddanmark.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 661: Sofian maailma, kirjoittanut Jostein Gaarder. Ei ole epäilystäkään siitä, että filosofia ja psykologia ovat yhteydessä toisiinsa monella eri tasolla. Gaarderin kirjassa käydään läpi filosofian historiaa nuoren Sofia-nimisen tytön elämän kautta. Keskeisessä roolissa on keski-ikäinen filosofi, joka yrittää opettaa sakkolihaa ymmärtämään elämää filosofian avulla. Kirja on sekä bestseller että monen lukion pakollisten luettavien listalla, eikä syyttä, sillä tämä Gaarderin mestariteos auttaa meitä ymmärtämään itseämme ihmisinä.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 675: Buddhist Meditation (ei suomennettu), kirjoittanut Ramiro Calle. Tutkimukset ovat osoittaneet, että säännöllisellä meditaatioharjoittelulla on monenlaisia terveydelle hyödyllisiä vaikutuksia. Callen teos on opettavainen ja mielenkiintoinen luettava kelle tahansa, joka haluaa oppia ymmärtämään meditaatiota paremmin. Mainonta.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 699: The movie is based on the cult novel by Kari Hotakainen, itself a comedic, exaggerated vision of the author's own bohemian life. A newspaper editor hints at Hotakainen (Martti Suosalo) that he should write autobiographical texts about real-world subjects. The lonely and quiet writer is confused since he has little life of which to write about. So he decides to buy a used car and write about the experience. But he has to meet some strange people such as the nihilistic salesman Kartio (Matti Onnismaa) and the jobless layabout Pera (Janne Hyytiäinen), in order to do so. Pera in particular will stop at nothing to get his hands on the same car Hotakainen has been viewing, which sparks up a huge rivalry. These flabby machos drive the disgruntled small guy over the edge.
    xxx/ellauri259.html on line 741: Elokuva tuo katsojalle tuulahduksen 80-luvun puolivälistä. Jännityselokuvaksi tarkoitettu pätkä saa koomisia piirteitä ja aika ajoin jopa viihdyttää katsojaa. Yön saalistajat on osa suomalaista elokuvahistoriaa ja siksi katsomisen arvoinen tapaus. Sen katsottuaan huomaa kuinka 25:ssä vuodessa on edetty suomalaisessa elokuvatuotannossa mahtiharppaus eteenpäin.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 59: Ylioppilas, Hyvinkään Uusi Yhteiskoulu 1965. Hum.kand., Helsingin yliopisto 1970. aineet: yleinen kirjallisuustiede ja estetiikka, sosiaalipsykologia, sosiologia, kansatiede, kansanrunous, pohjoismainen filologia, osia: taidehistoria, arkeologia.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 118: - En sano, että näkymätön maailma olisi vielä todellisempi, koska kirkon edustajien helmasyntinä on historian kuluessa ollut vähätellä näkyvän maailman arvoa. Esimerkiksi puritaanit sanoivat 1600-luvulla, että maan päällinen elämä on kärsimystä ja pakollinen välivaihe tulevan kirkkauden rinnalla. Ei tää mun mielestä ole ollut hassumpaa, näin hillomunkin näkökulmasta.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 134: Ambrosiuksen mukaan mysteereissä, pyhissä toimituksissa, ei ole läsnä vain silmälle näkymätön maailma sinänsä, vaan myös näkymätön maailma Jumalan ikuisuudesta ja iankaikkisuudesta nousevana. Lopun ajallisuus, eskatologisuus ei ole jotain, joka on pelkästään kuluvan ajan jälkeen, vaan se on sisäkkäin jo tässä ja nyt tämän kuluvan ajan kanssa.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 159: Naisbitt has had a profound influence leading on modern-day futurists, such as David Howler and others. David Howler (born 3 July 1948) is a futurist, keynote speaker, and author of The Shit Age. He coined the phrase "The Shit Age" and identified this new age as the successor to the Information Age in 2007. How right he was. Howler was profiled in the coffee table book Connected Worlds published by BTGroup PLC 2014.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 185: Alan Wilson Watts (6 January 1915 – 16 November 1973) was an English writer, speaker and self-styled "philosophical entertainer", known for interpreting and popularising Japanese, Chinese and Indian traditions of Buddhist, Taoist, and Hindu philosophy for a Western audience. Born in Chislehurst, England, he moved to the United States in 1938 and began Zen training in New York. He received a master´s degree in theology from Seabury-Western Theological Seminary and became an Episcopal priest in 1945. He left the ministry in 1950 and moved to California, where he joined the faculty of the Asian Academy of American Studies.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 190: Chislehurst, Kent, England, United Kingdom
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 218: Watts gained a following while working as a volunteer programmer at the KPFA radio station in Berkeley. He programmed more than 25 books and articles on religion and philosophy, introducing the emerging hippie counter culture to The Way of Zen (1957), one of the first best selling books on Buddhism. In Psychotherapy East and West (1961), he argued that Buddhism could be thought of as a form of psychotherapy. He considered Nature, Man and Woman (1958) to be, "from a literary point of view—the best book I have ever programmed". He also explored human consciousness and psychedelics in works such as "The New Alchemy" (1958) and The Joyous Cosmology (1962).
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 222: He also maintained relations with Jean Burden, his lover and the inspiration/editor of Nature, Man and Woman. Watts was a heavy smoker throughout his life and in his later years drank heavily.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 227: Burden received only a two-year scholarship offered to women to attend the University of Chicago where she studied frequently under Thornton Wilder and graduated in 1936. She and her husband David were married from 1940 to 1949. After the dissolution of their marriage, Jean met Alan Watts and they had a "four year, tumultuous love affair". Though ending badly, the union inspired Watts to call Jean in his autobiography (p. 297) an "important influence". Jean used Alan´s calligraphy and a quote from him (有水皆含月 : All the waters contain the moon) in her last major work, Taking Light from Each Other. She called him "one of the most fascinating men I have ever met, except Thornton was Wilder".
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 229: His quote "We think of time as a one-way motion," from his lecture Time & The More It Changes appears at the beginning of the season 1 finale of the Loki TV show along with quotes from Neil Armstrong, Greta Thunberg, Malala Yousafzai, Nelson Mandela, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, and Maya Angelou.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 240: His family lived for a time in China, where his sister Janet was born in 1910. He attended the English China Inland Mission Chefoo School at Yantai but returned with his mother and siblings to California in 1912 because of the unstable political conditions in China at the time. Thornton also attended Creekside Middle School in Berkeley, and graduated from Berkeley High School in 1915. Wilder also studied law for two years before dropping out of Purdue University.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 242: Amos Wilder was a stern, teetotaling Congregationalist who expected his son to be scholar-athlete and a muscular Christian. When Thornton announced that he had been cast as Lady Bracknell in a school production of The Importance of Being Earnest, the senior Wilder informed him that he would rather that Thornton not play female roles. Papa would not absolutely forbid it, but he assumed that his son would want to honor his father’s wishes. Thornton reluctantly conceded, but later wrote to his father in China, “When you have changed your mind as to it, please notify.”
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 244: Thornton Wilder´s older brother, Amos Niven Wilder, was Hollis Professor of Divinity at the Harvard Divinity School, a noted poet, and foundational to the development of the field theopoetics. Amos was also a nationally ranked tennis player who competed at the Wimbledon tennis championships in 1922. Thornton cared little for the rough-and-tumble of sports-crazy adolescents, and his classmates teased him for being “artistic” and overly-intellectual; he was known as a “freak.” A former classmate recalled: "We left him alone, just left him alone." Guess which son was father´s favourite and which mommy´s boy.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 246: Unlike her husband, Isabella Wilder was artistic and worldly, and she made certain that she and her children took full advantage of the benefits of living in a university town. “In Berkeley,” writes Malcolm Goldstein, “she found opportunities to study informally by attending lectures at the University of California and by participating in foreign-language discussion groups. She was fully aware that her husband, were he present, would not approve, but she encouraged her children, nevertheless, in their independent, extracurricular search for carnal knowledge.” Isabella saw to it that Thornton got vaudeville parts in plays presented in the Greek Theatre, and even sewed his female costumes for him.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 248: Theatre became his passion, and he spent hours in the Doe Library reading European newspapers to learn more about the modern expressionist movement. “The way other kids would follow baseball scores,” his nephew related, “Thornton’s hobby was reading German newspapers so he could read up on German Theater and great German directors like Max Reinhardt.”
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 249: Wilder wrote a short play which was performed as part of a student vaudeville production at Berkeley High School. Perhaps in reaction to his father’s disapproval of Lady Bracknell, he cast himself in the role of “Mr. Lydia Pinkham.”
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 251: Versed in foreign languages, he translated and "adapted" (appropriated) plays by Ibsen, Sartre and Obey. He read and spoke German, French and Spanish, and his scholarship included significant original research on James Joyce and Lope de Vega. He had met Jean-Paul Sartre on a U.S. lecture tour after the war, and was arrested under the influence of existentialism, although rejecting its atheist implications. In 1960, Wilder was awarded the first ever Edward MacDowell Medal by The MacDowell Colony for outstanding contributions to American LBTQ culture.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 255: He formed a close, fervent and life-long friendship with Gertrude Stein, but his shyness and natural reserve kept him from acknowledging their shared homosexuality. Writer Samuel Steward records the reticence which kept this close circle of friends deeply in the closet — even to one another. Six years after Wilder’s death, Samuel Steward wrote in his autobiography that he too had had sexual relations with him (and her):
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 265: Thornton´s themes are familiar from other personists — the timeless human condition; history as progressive, cyclical, or entropic; literature, philosophy, and religion as the touchstones of civilization.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 278: Bolt (his foreman, quite a gentleman) MR. WRENCH.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 280: Mizzle (his apprentice, wishing to be a gentleman) MR. OXBERRY.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 304: COT. Provoking! to leave my shop all day for the sake of calling on this old Wealthington!—that I should be required to call on him!—not but he is a rich relation, and I have great expectations from him; and my foreman, Bolt, and apprentice Mizzle, are quite fit persons with whom to entrust my shop. Egad, to make all the naughty apprentices look on those two young men would be as good a lesson as going to see George Barnwell on a boxing night!
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 323: COT. Come, this troublesome day’s work is well over. You have some time had my forgiveness, Harriet; I wish not to say anything unpleasant—but when I contrast your conduct with that of these two excellent young men——

    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 329: Eine Farce vom österreichischen Dramatiker Johann Nestroy (1842), unwissentlich aus A Day well spent von John Oxenford kopiert
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 419: The 1958 film version, adapted by John Michael Hayes and directed by Joseph Anthony, starred Shirley Booth as Dolly, Anthony Perkins as Cornelius, Shirley MacLaine as Irene, Paul Ford as Vandergelder, and Robert Horse reprising his Broadway role as Barnaby.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 429: The plot of Hello, Dolly! originated in the 1835 English play A Day Well Spent by John Oxenford, which Johann Nestroy adapted into the farce Einen Jux will er sich machen (He Will Go on a Spree or He'll Have Himself a Good Time) in 1842. Thornton Wilder adapted Nestroy's play into his 1938 farcical play The Merchant of Yonkers. That play was a flop, so he revised it and retitled it as The Matchmaker in 1954, expanding the role of Dolly (played by Ruth Gordon).The Matchmaker became a hit and was much revived and made into a 1958 film starring Shirley Booth.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 436: Horace Vandergelder: The proprietor of a Hay & Feed store and a client of Dolly Gallagher Levi's. A well-known half-a-millionaire and widower, he is gruff, authoritative, and set in his ways.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 454: Judge: A white-whiskered night court judge. Easily moved to tears by romance.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 458: As the nineteenth becomes the 20th century, all of New York City is excited because widowed but brassy Dolly Gallagher Levi is in town ("Call on Dolly"). Dolly makes a living through what she calls "meddling" – matchmaking and numerous sidelines, including dance instruction and mandolin lessons ("I Put My Hand In"). She is currently seeking a wife for grumpy Horace Vandergelder, the well-known half-a-millionaire, but it becomes clear that Dolly intends to marry Horace herself. Ambrose Kemper, a young artist, wants to marry Horace's weepy niece Ermengarde, but Horace opposes this because Ambrose's vocation does not guarantee a steady living. Ambrose enlists Dolly's help, and they travel to Yonkers, New York to visit Horace, who is a prominent citizen there and owns Vandergelder's Hay and Feed.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 460: Horace explains to his two clerks, Cornelius Hackl and Barnaby Tucker, that he is going to get married because "It Takes a Woman" to cheerfully do all the household chores. He plans to travel with Dolly to New York City to march in the Fourteenth Street Association Parade and propose to the widow Irene Molloy, who owns a hat shop there. Dolly arrives in Yonkers and "accidentally" mentions that Irene's first husband might not have died of natural causes, and also mentions that she knows an heiress, Ernestina Money, who may be interested in Horace. Horace leaves for New York and leaves Cornelius and Barnaby to run the store.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 462: Cornelius decides that he and Barnaby need to get out of Yonkers. They'll go to New York, have a good meal, spend all their money, see the stuffed whale in Barnum's museum, almost get arrested, and each kiss a girl! They blow up some tomato cans to create a terrible stench as a pretext to close the store. Dolly mentions that she knows two ladies in New York they should call on: Irene Molloy and her shop assistant, Minnie Fay. She tells Ermengarde and Ambrose that she'll enter them in the polka competition at the upscale Harmonia Gardens Restaurant in New York City so Ambrose can demonstrate his ability to be a breadwinner to Horace. Cornelius, Barnaby, Ambrose, Ermengarde and Dolly all take the train to New York ("Put on Your Sunday Clothes").
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 464: Irene and Minnie open their hat shop for the afternoon. Irene wants a husband, but does not love Horace Vandergelder. She declares that she will wear an elaborate hat to impress a gentleman ("Ribbons Down My Back"). Cornelius and Barnaby arrive at the shop and pretend to be rich. Horace and Dolly arrive at the shop, and Cornelius and Barnaby hide from him. Irene inadvertently mentions that she knows Cornelius Hackl, and Dolly tells her and Horace that even though Cornelius is Horace's clerk by day, he's a New York playboy by night; he's one of the Hackls. Minnie screams when she finds Cornelius hiding in the armoire. Horace is about to open the armoire himself, but Dolly, Irene and Minnie distract him with patriotic sentiments related to subjects like Betsy Ross and The Battle of the Alamo shown in the famous lyrics "Alamo, remember the Alamo!" ("Motherhood March"). Cornelius sneezes, and Horace storms out, realizing there are men hiding in the shop, but not knowing they are his clerks.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 476: Directed by Gene Kelly and written and produced by Ernest Lehman, the film stars Barbra Streisand, Walter Matthau, Michael Crawford, Danny Lockin, Tommy Tune, Fritz Feld, Marianne McAndrew, E. J. Peaker and Louis Armstrong (whose recording of the title tune had become a number-one single in May 1964). The film follows the story of Dolly Levi, a strong-willed matchmaker who travels to Yonkers, New York in order to find a match for the miserly "well-known unmarried half-a-millionaire" Horace Vandergelder. In doing so, she convinces his niece, his niece's intended and Horace's two clerks to travel to New York.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 515: In 1890, all of New York City is excited because the well-known widowed matchmaker Dolly Levi is in town. Dolly is currently seeking a wife for grumpy Horace Vandergelder, the well-known "half-a-millionaire", but it soon becomes clear that she intends to marry Horace herself. Meanwhile, Ambrose Kemper, a young artist, wants to marry Horace's niece, Ermengarde. However, Horace opposes this, feeling Ambrose cannot provide financial security. Horace, who is the owner of Vandergelder's Hay and Feed, explains to his two clerks, Cornelius Hackl and Barnaby Tucker, that he is going to get married, though what he really wants is a housekeeper. He plans to travel to New York that very day to march in the 14th Street Parade, and also to propose to milliner Irene Molloy, whom he has met through Dolly Levi. Dolly arrives in Yonkers and sends Horace ahead to the city. Before leaving, he tells Cornelius and Barnaby to mind the store.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 517: Cornelius, weary of his dull existence, decides that he and Barnaby need to get out of Yonkers. Dolly overhears, and decides to set them up with Irene Molloy and her shop assistant, Minnie Fay. She also helps Ambrose and Ermengarde, entering them in a dance contest at the very fancy Harmonia Gardens restaurant, which Dolly and her late husband frequented. The entire company takes the train to New York.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 519: In New York, Irene and Minnie open their hat shop for the afternoon. Irene does not love Horace Vandergelder, but knows that the marriage will provide her with financial security and an escape from her boring job. However, Irene hopes to escape her loveless marriage, and plans to try and find real love before the summer is over. Cornelius and Barnaby arrive at the shop and pretend to be rich- Irene seems to take to Cornelius immediately. Horace and Dolly arrive, and Cornelius and Barnaby hide. Minnie screams when she finds Cornelius hiding in an armoire. Horace is about to open the armoire himself, but Dolly "searches" it and pronounces it empty. After hearing Cornelius sneeze, Horace storms out upon realizing there are men hiding in the shop, although he is unaware that they are his clerks. Dolly arranges for Cornelius and Barnaby, who are still pretending to be rich, to take the ladies out to dinner at Harmonia Gardens to make up for their humiliation. Dolly briefly tries to teach Cornelius and Barnaby to dance, which leads to the whole town dancing in the local park.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 523: Cornelius is determined to get a kiss before the night is over. Since the clerks have no money to hire a carriage, they tell the girls that walking to the restaurant is more stylish. In a quiet flat, Dolly prepares for the evening. At the Harmonia Gardens Restaurant, Rudolph, the head waiter, whips his crew into shape for Dolly Levi´s return. Horace arrives to meet his date, who is really Dolly´s friend Gussie. As it turns out, she is not rich or elegant as Dolly implied, and she soon leaves after being bored by Horace, just as she and Dolly planned.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 525: Cornelius, Barnaby and their dates arrive and are unaware that Horace is also at the restaurant. Dolly makes her triumphant return to the restaurant and is greeted in style by the staff. She sits in the now-empty seat at Horace´s table and proceeds to tell him that no matter what he says, she will not marry him. Fearful of being caught, Cornelius confesses to the ladies that he and Barnaby have no money, and Irene, who knew they were pretending all along, offers to pay for the meal. She then realizes that she left her handbag with all her money in it at home. The four try to sneak out during the polka contest, but Horace recognizes them and also spots Ermengarde and Ambrose. In the ensuing confrontation, Vandergelder fires Cornelius and Barnaby, and they are forced to flee as a riot breaks out. Cornelius professes his love for Irene. Horace declares that he would not marry Dolly if she were the last woman in the world. Dolly angrily bids him farewell; while he´s bored and lonely, she will be living the high life.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 527: The next morning, back at the hay and feed store, Cornelius and Irene, Barnaby and Minnie, and Ambrose and Ermengarde each come to collect the money Vandergelder owes them. Chastened, he finally admits that he needs Dolly in his life, but she is unsure about the marriage until Ephram sends her a sign. Cornelius becomes Horace´s business partner at the store, and Barnaby fills Cornelius´ old position. Horace tells Dolly life would be dull without her, and she promises that she will "never go away again".
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 583: To what extent God may properly be understood as "dead" is highly debated among death of God theologians. In its strongest forms, God is said to have literally died, often as incarnated on the cross or at the moment of creation. Weaker forms of this theological bent often interpret the "death of God" as meaning that God never existed, or that people today "do not experience God except, perhaps, as a hidden, silent, pipe-smoking absent-minded being."
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 585: Hegel argued that God (as Absolute or Father) is radically negated by the concrete incarnation of God (as Christ or Son). This negation is subsequently itself negated at the Crucifixion of Jesus, resulting in the emergence of the Holy Spirit, God as both concrete (the church) and absolute (spiritual community). In Hegelian thought, therefore, the death of God does not result in a strict negativity, but rather, permits the emergence of the full revelation of God: absolute consciousness.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 586: The 18th- and 19th-century mystic William Blake, in his intricately engraved illuminated books, refused to view the crucifixion of Jesus as a simple bodily death, and, rather, saw in this event a kenosis, a self-emptying of God.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 588: Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche occasionally used the phrase "God is dead" to reflect increasing unbelief in God. God is dead (German: Gott ist tot (help·info); also known as the death of God) is a statement made by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche´s first use of this statement is his 1882 The Gay Science, where it appears three times.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 590: In the madman passage, the madman is described as running through a marketplace shouting, "I seek God! I seek God!" He arouses some amusement; no one takes him seriously. "Maybe he took an ocean voyage? Lost his way like a little child? Maybe he´s afraid of us (non-believers) and is hiding?" – much laughter. Frustrated, the madman smashes his lantern on the ground, crying out that "God is dead, and we have killed him, you and I!".
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 596: The phrase also appears in Nietzsche´s Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Before Nietzsche, the concept was popularized in philosophy by the German philosopher Philipp Mainländer. "God has died and his death was the life of the world." — Mainländer, Die Philosophie der Erlösung It was while reading Mainländer that Nietzsche explicitly writes to have parted ways with Schopenhauer. Nietzsche is dead (signed) God.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 599: The phrase "God is dead" appears in the hymn "Ein Trauriger Grabgesang" ("A mournful dirge") by Johann von Rist. Johann Rist (8 March 1607 - 31 August 1667) was a German poet and dramatist best known for his hymns, which inspired musical settings and have remained in hymnals. Rist was born at Ottensen in Holstein-Pinneberg (today Hamburg) on 8 March 1607; the son of the Lutheran pastor of that place, Caspar Rist. Rist´s 1641/1642 hymn "Ein trauriger Grabgesang" is notable for being an early occurrence of the phrase "God is dead" in German culture, this time in an explicitly theistic, Protestant Christian context. The text goes:
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 607: In his 1961 booklet The Death of God. Gabriel Vahanian argued that modern secular culture had lost all sense of the sacred, lacking any sacramental meaning, no transcendental purpose or sense of providence. He concluded that for the modern mind "God is dead".
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 610: had incarnated in Christ and imparted his immanent spirit which remained in the world even though Jesus was dead. Unlike Nietzsche, Altizer believed that God truly died. He was considered to be the leading exponent of the Death of God movement. Thornton Wilder´s tennis playing big brother Amos called his approach theopoetics.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 614: Strongly influenced by both Dietrich Bonhoeffer and G.K. Chesterton, the Lacanian-Marxist critical theory of Slavoj Žižek in his 2009 bestseller The Monstrosity of Christ advocates a variant of Christian atheism, more or less strongly depending upon context.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 618: As Nietzsche pointed out, "When one gives up the Christian faith, one pulls the mat of Christian morality out from under one´s feet. This morality is by no means self-evident. By breaking one main concept out of Christianity, the faith in God, one breaks the whole crockery: nothing necessary remains in one's hands." Martin Heidegger understood this aspect of Nietzsche´s philosophy by looking at it as the death of metaphysics.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 622: Eliade was Saul Bellow's colleague and a pain in the ass in Chicago. He was a leading interpreter of religious experience, who established paradigms in religious studies that persisted to his dying day. His theory that hierophanies form the basis of religion, splitting the human experience of reality into sacred and profane space and time, has proved influential. A hierophany (Mircea's own invention) is a manifestation of the sacred. Eliade argues that religion is based on a sharp distinction between the sacred and the profane. According to Eliade, for traditional man, myths describe "breakthroughs of the sacred (or the 'supernatural') into the World"—that is, hierophanies.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 627: Secular theology rejects the substance dualism of modern religion, the belief in two forms of reality required by the belief in heaven and hell. Secular theology can accommodate a belief in God, like many nature religions, but as residing in this world somewhere and not separately from it.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 633: Secular theology holds that theism has lost credibility as a valid conception of God´s nature. It rejects the concept of a personal God and embraces the status of Jesus Christ, Christology and Christian eschatology as Christian mythology without basis in historical events.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 635: The movement also suggested the legitimacy of seeking the holy outside the church itself. Thereby it suggests that the church did not have exclusive rights to divine inspiration. In a sense, this incorporated a strong sense of continuous revelation in which truth of the religious sort was sought out in poetry, music, art, or even the pub and in the street. [citation sorely needed].
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 650: Most Christian atheists believe that God never existed, but there are a few who believe in the death of God literally. Thomas J. J. Altizer is a well-known Christian atheist who is known for his literal approach to the death of God. Altizer wrote of God as the enemy to man because mankind could never reach its fullest potential while God existed.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 654: Some follow the tradition of "Christian non-realism", most famously expounded in the United Kingdom by Don Cupitt in the 1980s, which holds that God is a symbol or metaphor and that religious language is not matched by a transcendent reality. According to an investigation of 860 pastors in seven Dutch Protestant denominations, 1 in 6 clergy are either agnostic or atheist. A minister Klaas Hendrikse has described God as "a word for experience, or human experience" and said that Jesus may have never existed. Hendrikse gained attention with his book Believing in a God Who Does Not Exist: Manifesto of An Atheist Pastor published in November 2007 in which he said that it was not necessary to believe in God´s existence in order to believe in God.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 658: In his book Mere Christianity, the apologist C. S. Lewis, creator of Narnia and writer of fascinating scifi books in Portuguese about Mars and Venus*, objected to Hamilton´s version of Christian atheism and the claim that Jesus was merely a moral guide:


    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 662: I am here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: 'I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't accept his claim to be God.' That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic—on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg—or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronising nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to. ... Now it seems to me obvious that He was neither a lunatic nor a fiend: and consequently, however strange or terrifying or unlikely it may seem, I have to accept the view that He was and is God.
    xxx/ellauri261.html on line 665: Lewis's argument, now known as Lewis's trilemma, has been criticized for, among other things, constituting a false trilemma, since it does not deal with other options such as Jesus being mistaken, misrepresented, or simply mythical. Philosopher John Beversluis argues that Lewis "deprives his readers of numerous alternate interpretations of Jesus that carry with them no such odious implications". Bart Ehrman stated it is a mere legend that the historical Jesus has called himself God; that was unknown to Lewis since he never was a professional Bible scholar, just an Oxbridge apostle. Taisi vetää perään myös katolista J.R.R. Tolkienia.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 119: Mixi brittiskoudesarjan naisilla on kaikilla poikaystävinä ahdistelevat niitä selkeästi huonommat poliisikollegat? Onko se naiskazojille ahistelusta huolimatta mieluisaa? Onhan se voimaannuttavaa. Äijät on aivan lääpällään ja juoxee perässä kuin kiimaiset koirat, niitä voi mielin määrin potkia, eikä ne silti hellitä! Oliko Stolbovan italiaano sellainen? Vai eikö se ollut, helli vain niitä koiroja? Sixikö se sai saapasta? Elämme vaikeita aikoja ystävä hyvä. Se oli liian vanha, ukkoutunut. Siitä tuli Suomen oloissa eläkeukko, stölberö. Kielipuoli, ei puhunut venäjää eikä suomea. I feel your pain, nilkki ymmärtää. Tunnemme ydinpelkoa. Ihminen rakastaa sitä ihmistä joka hyväxyy sen sellaisena kun se on.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 164: Anto2 63v ymmärtää historian ironiaa, siitä plussaa. Ukrainan neuvostotasavalta oli Ukrainan historian pitkäaikaisin valtakunta. Izenäinen Ukraina on Leninin (ja Stalinin) luomus. (Entäs Kiovan Rus? Eikö sekään ollut pitkäikäisempi? No oli helkkarissa: 882–1240.)
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 202: Vanhat totuudet on turvallisia joskin tylsiä, toisto tyylikeinona, tiedelehtikään ei myy ilman uutisia. Mieluiten hyviä, mutta huonotkin myyvät paremman puutteessa. Köhisevä emeritus rehtori ei kyllä hätkäytä, on se sevverran kuivakka.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 205: - Mutta onko yhteiskunnan muuttumisessa jotain säännönmukaisuuxia? Oliko Marx oikeassa vaiko väärässä Se onkin jo paljon vaikeampaa sanoa! Miten kommunismi leviää? Ilmassa vai kosketuxesta? Voiko kommunikatiivinen kapitalismi estää sen? Se jää nähtäväxi, watch this place. Mut ei mennä nyt sinne. Yhteiskunnassa on aina kiire. Voimme silti luottaa amerikkalaisiin filosofeihin. Filosofit pohtivat vastuullisesti. Me olemme luotettavampia kuin muut. Aikaa voi tosin mennä ikuisuuxia. No hei herää Pallo, pallollakin alkaa olla kiire.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 226: Toivon horisontti on Eskin eufemismi optimismille. Toivo elää faktoista irrallaan kuin lapamato ohuzuolessa. Korona kauhistaa kaikkia, joitakuita näyttää jostain syystä huolettavan ilmastokysymys, Ukraina masentaa koko Suomea etenkin kun Nato-optio jumittaa. No ei muuta kuin kieli pitkälle Erdoganin perseeseen. Halal-teurastus on oikeastaan hieno asia. Elukat nauttivat voidessaan palvella Abrahamin poikia.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 242: Suomi on lottovoittomaa! (Juuh! kuuluu Nilkin taustakuorosta.) Vaikka jossain Ressun lukiossa on pääosin kermaperseitä, ei se kuitenkaan ESTÄ ettei siellä vois olla satunnaisia rotinkaisten streebereiden lapsia kuten minä. Toinen kouluelitisti taitaa olla Ville Ranta, se pitää painotettujen koulujen puolia. Niihin menee sliipattuja hyvien perheiden lapsia, kun white trash ja mamut rähisevät puukot kädessä rupukouluissa.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 272: Samulia joteskin kiinostaa nää perinteiset sukupuoliroolit, oiskohan se hiukka setämies. Aina pitää varoa ettei jotain lipsaha jota ei oisi saanut sanoa. Yhden vizi on toisen pyöristys. Eikä tää ole vittu mikään kommunikaation kompsastus, vaan normit eroavat. Vanhuxet nauraa tosi vähän js huonosti. Niiltä on jo vizit vähissä. Ne ei tajua. Hoivakotiin en lähe keikalle, en edes vaipoissa. Mikä on MC vanhus kysyy väliin. Vanhat tulee jälleen lapsixi, ne alkaa vääntää Tampereen tai Jalasjärven murretta, haluaisi kuulla Onni-klovnia. Risto "K" (58v) haluisi kuulla rockabillyä.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 306: Aalto-Setälä on juontanut muun muassa televisio-ohjelmia Hyvät, pahat ja rumat (1995–1997) ja Vaarallinen risteytys (2003, yhdessä Kirsi Nännipihan kanssa). Vuonna 2007 hän juonsi visailuohjelmaa Älä vetämättä jätä, joka palkittiin pallopäisellä Venlalla ja Keltainen TV -palkinnolla. Hän on juontanut myös Yle Radio Suomen keskiviikkoiltojen Pyöreä pöytä ja liian vähän haarukoita -nahisteluohjelmaa sekä MTV3:n Kirjahyllyn takana piilosleikkiä yhdessä Erkki Tuomiojan kanssa.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 348: Sitten on vielä tää Shulhan Arukhista tuttu rabbi Joosef Kaaro:
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 355: In the crossdressing community, the man who admits he is turned on by his dressing is still considered a pervert. The autogynephilic transsexual will not receive the same sympathy for her transsexualism as the non-autocynocephalic transsexual. That's exactly what makes Bailey's book so dangerous: it allows transsexual "women" to be condemned by the trans society for having "perverse" sexual arousal patterns. Mitä niissä muka on vikana?
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 357: Jani Kaaro ei muista Thronhillin ja Palmerin nimiä. Käytä wikipediaa! Behavior resembling rape in humans can be seen in the animal kingdom, including ducks and geese [citation needed], bottlenose dolphins, and chimpanzees. Indeed, in orangutans, close human relatives, such copulations constitute up to half of observed matings. Such 'forced copulations' involve animals being approached and sexually penetrated while struggling or attempting to escape. Observations of forced sex in animals are uncontroversial; controversial are the interpretation of these observations and the extension of theories based on them to humans. Thornhill introduces this theory by describing the sexual behavior of scorpionflies. In which the male may gain sex from the female either by presenting a gift of food during courtship or without a nuptial offering, in which case force is necessary to restrain her.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 380: But to infer from that, as many critics assert that Thornhill and Palmer do, that what is biological is somehow right or good, would be to fall into the so-called appeal to nature. They make a comparison to "natural disasters as epidemics, floods and tornadoes". This shows that what can be found in nature is not always good and that measures should be and are taken against natural phenomena. They further argue that a good knowledge of the causes of rape, including evolutionary ones, are necessary in order to develop effective preventive measures. Of course, my dears, what is good for the rapist is bad for the rest of us. It is equally natural to be critical of it. Killing is also natural, and may be beneficial for the perpertrator it, but not for the victims.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 402: Ferguson has a long history of controversial remarks. In 2013, he criticized John Maynard Keynes for being gay and childless. He later apologized for his remarks, but claimed that accusations of homophobia are part of the “occupational hazards of public life nowadays.” Ferguson also suggested that so-called cancel culture in universities would have been unthinkable during his time as a student, and even during his earlier teaching career at NYU.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 406: Peter Boghossian, who recently resigned from his position as a philosophy professor at Portland State University, is now a faculty fellow at UATX. Along with two other colleagues, Boghossian fabricated and submitted 20 fake academic papers in 2018 as a hoax to make a point about contemporary academic journals. Four of the papers were published and were later retracted.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 408: Boghossian and his collaborators in the hoax wrote that fields such as cultural and identity studies were “grievance studies” with the “common goal of problematizing aspects of culture in minute detail in order to attempt diagnoses of power imbalances and oppression rooted in identity.”
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 415: Correction, Dec. 15: A previous version of this article misstated Ferguson and Haidt’s stances on “illiberalism.” They are opposing it, not promoting it. The article has been updated to reflect the correction and WSN regrets the error.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 419: Last week the New York University (NYU) psychology professor announced that he would resign at the end of the year from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, his primary professional association, because of a newly adopted requirement that everybody presenting research at the group's conferences explain how their submission advances "equity, inclusion, and anti-racism goals." It was the sort of litmus test against which he has warned, and which he sees as corroding institutions of higher learning.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 435: There’s a lot of interest internationally, and what I’ve picked up is that everyone recognizes that America is particularly sick, that we’re worse off than other countries. But on the other hand, they see the signs in their own country. And so there’s a lot of interest in what’s happening in America, because it’s clear this could be a problem that many liberal democracies are going to face — or are beginning to face — in the social media age.
    xxx/ellauri265.html on line 441: I co-founded with Caroline Mehl OpenMind. If you run or are a member of any kind of group — a classroom, a soccer team, a nonprofit, a company — try OpenMind as a group. This platform actually teaches you the skills of understanding others, appreciating why we often can’t understand others, and how to talk across divides, avoiding communication's stumbling stones!
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 170: Leopold Ritter von Sacher-Masoch (* 27. Januar 1836 in Lemberg, Kaisertum Österreich, heute Ukraine; † 9. März 1895 in Lindheim, Großherzogtum Hessen ‑Darmstadt) war ein österreichischer Schriftsteller. Er schrieb auch unter den Pseudonymen Charlotte Arand und Zoë von Rodenbach. Der Begriff Masochismus, den Richard von Krafft-Ebing erstmals in die Psychologie einführte, geht auf die Venus im Pelz zurück und ist aus Leopold von Sacher-Masochs Nachnamen abgeleitet. Tää Krafft-Ebing on putkahtanut esiin kuin tuhatlehtinen, mm. albumeissa 28 (Mark Twain), 67 (Pynchon) ja 129 (Jung). Aika sekobolzi jos multa kysytään.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 173:
    Tuherovenus valmistautuu piiskaamaan Masochistia.

    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 177: Siis oikeasti ukrainalainen Masoch väitteli historiasta ja siitä tuli itävaltalainen tuhatakateemikko ize perustamaansa tuhatakatemiaan. Als Mitglied des Grazer Corps Tartarus hatte er den (bezeichnenden) Kneipnamen „Narciss“.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 236: The names of the Hogwarts Houses were created on the back of an aeroplane sick bag. Yes, it was empty to start with. The increasingly dark tone of the series was inspired by Rowling’s life experiences. The Dementors, among the most frightening creatures in the franchise (sic), were inspired by the Great Depression following the gay 20´s. Or was it the Great Recession following the gay 2000's?
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 240: What is a character that is written so you're meant to feel one way towards them, but you actually feel the opposite about them? Mine is Merope Gaunt. She was written to be pitied for, and that would be true for almost all of her story, but I find it hard to really do that when you consider she basically gave Riddle either a date rape potion or used dark magic to make him a puppet and remove all form of mental resistance from his head by magic and had sex with him against the will of his right mind to have a child, then expected him to stay for a child he never meant to have.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 246: She had begun writing Harry Potter by this time, before the couple divorced in 1994. After the Harry Potter books came out, Rowling’s stardom rose and in time, she met and married her second husband, Neil Murray. Joannella on tosi vino suu.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 253: Alone and destitute, Merope sold Slytherin's priceless locket (yes, that one) to Borgin and Burkes for just ten Galleons. It seems that when Merope lost her husband she also lost the will to live. When she arrived heavily pregnant on the steps of the London orphanage where Tom Riddle Jr was to spend his early years, she seemed to know she wasn't going to make it.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 256: She died many years before the events of Harry Potter's life and is generally viewed as both a sympathetic and tragic character. Despite this, Merope is still an antagonist, one that left a huge impact upon Britain's magical community. Were it not for her, Lord Voldemort may never have been born. If so, then the Wizarding Wars and the innumerable tragedies associated with them, might never have happened. JKRowling would never have become filthy rich and a philantrope.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 259: Merope loved her husband very much and wanted him to love her of his own free will. As such, not long after learning about her pregnancy, Merope decided to lift the enchantment. She hoped that once free, Tom would return her affection and be delighted to learn that he was an expecting father. In the event that did not happen, Merope assumed that Tom would do the honorable thing and stay for the sake of his child. This hope however, turned out to be misplaced and forlorn. What exactly happened is not known, but after coming to his senses, Tom Riddle reacted very badly to his situation. It is not known what words were exchanged between husband and wife, but evidently, Merope either told Tom the full story or enough for him to figure out what had happened. Far from being loving or understanding, Tom was justifiably furious at Merope for intervening in and (from his perspective) ruining his life. Merope's world was shattered when Tom Riddle made very clear that:
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 265: He wanted nothing to do with Merope or his unborn child.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 267: Precisely what Jorge Arantes tweaked from barbed wire to Joanie in Lisbon! Thus, within a few months of his runaway marriage, Jorge Arantes abandoned his wife, leaving Joanie to her fate. She ultimately returned to Edinburgh and his sister. Since Jorge had no way to prove that Joanie was a witch who stole his daughter, and would be thought insane if he told anybody the truth, Arantes told his family a modified version of the truth. He told them that he had been "hoodwinked" and "taken in". When word of this later reached Edinburgh, the residents concluded that Joanie had lied to Jorge about being pregnant with his child, thus tricking him into marrying her. Just like Phil Roth's first wife did to him!
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 269: On 31st December 1926, tired and disheveled Joanie Rowling staggered onto the steps of Edinburgh's muggle orphanage. Within an hour, she had given birth to a healthy baby girl. She told one of the publisher that she wanted her antihero to be named Tom Marvolo Riddle. Tom Riddle for his father and Marvolo for hers. In a word, a partial anagram of Voldemort. Why not call him Dolt Mover or Overt Mold, wouldn't that have been more convenient? Arkistostamme joulua.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 271: Despite Arantes's absence, she never the less passed several of his skills onto her brainchild Voldemort. This included a talent for fiction and the ability to speak Parseltongue. Most importantly, Voldemort had been conceived through a love potion rather than genuine affection, because Joanne lost the ability to feel love for herself. This inability to understand compassion or care for number one was one reason that Joanne cast Voldemort in the role of a mass murderer in her later books (instead of Harry). Another reason might be that the name is almost an anagram of Voldemar Putin.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 333: Todellakin, Rowlingin romaaneja on usein nähty metaforina taistelulle fasismia vastaan. Hänen pääpahista, Lordi Voldemortia, motivoi eräänlainen eugeeninen ennakkoluulo muita kuin taikuutta käyttäviä käyttäjiä kohtaan, mikä on ilmeinen nyökkäys natsiideologialle. Rowlingilla muggletkin saa olla mukana, kun wizardit muxivat pahaa dagomatua.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 345: Scrooge has influenced many an antisemitic caricature after him. Mr. Potter in “It’s a Wonderful Life” is a twisted, disabled Scrooge of the American Midwest. Dr. Seuss’ Grinch is Scrooge in a fur suit and a vaguely fantasy setting; he’s a scheming outsider who, like his blueprint, has to be converted. The thin, ugly Gollum of J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle-earth is an amalgam of Scrooge and Alberich, the gold-obsessed antagonist of composer (and notorious antisemite) Richard Wagner’s “Das Rheingold.” From his introduction in “The Hobbit” on, Gollum is motivated by a lust for a magic ring he calls “my precious.”
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 366: Still, Jewish stereotypes and prejudice persist. That is reflected, and to some degree advanced, by fictional narratives and imagery that (unconsciously or otherwise) associate goodness with Christian charity and evil with supposed Jewish greed. In his "lighthearted" criticism of Rowling, Stewart reminded us that our fantasies remain structured around antisemitism. As long as that’s the case, Jewish people will be at risk, and defeating Voldemort will be that much harder.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 384: In 1976, Harjo graduated from the University of New Mexico with a major in creative writing. She continued to study writing at the Iowa Writers' Workshop, where she obtained a Master of Fine Arts degree in 1978. However, the setting was not welcoming for Harjo, who later stated, "I was ghettoized." Among Harjo's books of poetry are What on Earth Drove Me to This? (1980), which she later said contained "probably only two good poems". Ei ne tosiaan kovin kummosia ole vaikka Harjo on jo yli 70v harjotellut.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 477: Joitakin muistojani avaa rakkauden kuva ruudulla kuviteltu tulevaisuus tai murtuminen, kun ”Careless Whisperin” saksosoolo puhaltaa läpi yhteisen sydämen. Kyllä, on olemassa kosminen tietoisuus. Jung nimesi sen, mutta kyllä se oli siellä kauan ennen kuin Vedic- ja Mvskoke-tutkijat nimesivät sen. Ja sit on tää kosminen sydämellisyys - sillä sydän on korkeampi mieli, eikä siellä voida unohtaa mitään, ei koskaan eikä koskaan. Kuinka laulan tämän, jotta en unohda? Vedänkö saxosoolon enste? Vai perään? Kysy oikeilta runoilijoilta. Jokainen sana on pahvilaatikko, joka voidaan avata tai sulkea. Sitten kun on koossa joukko sanoja ja lauseita, musiikkia, tulee rytmin tarve järjestää tätä kaaosta.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 503: Born in 1956, David Sedaris spent his childhood in New York and North Carolina. He was the second of six children born to Sharon and Lou Sedaris, IBM engineers who eventually moved the family to Raleigh, North Carolina. Sedaris graduated from Sanderson High School in Raleigh, where he performed in plays and wrestled with the realization he was gay. After moving to New York City in the fall of 1991, Sedaris found jobs as a housecleaner and department store elf to support his writing.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 505: Sedaris went slightly off course with Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk (2010), an audio book collection of gay animal fables, noting the sudden change from "having 50 listeners to 50 million listeners." A New Republic article charged him with fabricating his bio, but the allegations ultimately had little effect on the author´s popularity. Sedaris continues to tour hickland in support of his books, with his readings drawing huge crowds.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 507: In 2001, Sedaris was awarded the Thumber Prize for American Humor and named Humorist of the Year by Time magazine. He has also earned three Grammy nominations for audio versions of his works, and in 2008 he was awarded an honorary doctorate by Binghamton University in New York.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 508: The author has been with longtime boyfriend Hugh Hamrick, an artist and designer, since the early 1990s. After living together in New York City, Paris and Tokyo, the couple resides in West Sussex, England. He became known for his bitingly funny recollections of his youth, sex life and travel experiences in foreign countries.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 540: Simon Wiesenthal had been an architect in what is present-day Ukraine before World War II broke out, but after the war began his life took a horrific turn. Wiesenthal was sent to his first concentration camp in 1941 in Ukraine and later escaped from the Ostbahn camp in 1943, just before the Germans began to kill the inmates, according to the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s website. He was recaptured in June 1944, and sent to Janowska where he narrowly avoided death one more time—when the German eastern front collapsed and the guards decided to bring the remaining prisoners to the Mauthausen camp in Austria. He was freed there by the U.S. Army in May of 1945, weighing less than 100 pounds.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 542: After the war ended, Wiesenthal dedicated his life to tracking down Nazi criminals after realizing “there is no freedom without justice,” according to The Associated Press. Wiesenthal began his work gathering and preparing evidence on the Nazis for the War Crimes Section of the United States Army, according to his website. He’d go on to head the Jewish Central Committee of the United States Zone of Austria and later helped to open the Jewish Historical Documentation Center. The center worked to gather evidence for future trials on war criminals.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 544: He is credited with tracking down Austrian policeman Karl Silberbauer in 1963. Silberbauer, acting during World War II as a Gestapo officer, was responsible for arresting Anne Frank — who later died in a concentration camp after leaving behind a now-famous diary documenting her time in hiding. Wiesenthal also helped ferret out other Nazi leaders in hiding, including Franz Murer, known as “The Butcher of Vilnius,” and Erich Rajakowitsch, according to his website.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 546: To track down Franz Stangl, who had commanded two concentration camps in Poland, Wiesenthal did undercover work for three years before tracking the former SS officer down in Brazil. Stangl was later sentenced to life in prison for his crimes.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 548: It’s believed Wiesenthal also played a role in hunting down notorious SS leader Adolf Eichmann, who had organized the extermination of the Jews. Wiesenthal received information that Eichmann had been hiding out in Argentina and passed the information on to Israel, according to his center’s website.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 553: While some have criticized Wiesenthal for exaggerating his role in bringing the Eichmann to justice, he told the Associated Press in 1972 it had been “a teamwork of many who did not know each other,” and said he didn't know for sure whether the reports he had sent to Israel had been used in the capture.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 554: He established The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Jewish human rights organization, in 1977 to continue his work of pursuing Nazi war criminals and fighting anti-Semitism. His efforts inspired the multiple books, including “The Murderers Among Us” and a HBO movie of the same name starring Ben Hur as Simon Wiesenthal.
    xxx/ellauri268.html on line 556: “When history looks back, I want people to know the Nazis weren’t able to kill millions of people and get away with it,” he once said, according to the center’s website. Wiesenthal died in 2005 at the age of 96. Kosto elää, tai siis eli.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 48: Novellikokoelmassa Weekend Guatemalassa (1956) yllättävästi nobelisti Asturias piirtää sarjan väkevätehoisia kuvia vallankaappauksesta ja sen yhteydessä suoritetuista köyhien intiaanien joukkomurhista, jotka Guatemalassa toimeenpantiin Yhdysvaltain tuella 1954.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 59: Guatemalan historiassa on inkkareiden verta kauhottu enemmänkuin lautasellinen. Se on huvittavaa luettavaa, jos termiittiapinoiden ketkuilu enää ylipäänsä naurattaa.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 61: The history of Guatemala begins with the Maya civilization (2600 BC – 1697 AD), which was among those that flourished in their country. The country's modern history began with the Spanish conquest of Guatemala in 1524. Most of the great Classic-era (250 – 900 AD) Maya cities of the Petén Basin region, in the northern lowlands, had been abandoned by the year 1000 AD. The states in the Belize central highlands flourished until the 1525 arrival of Spanish conquistador Pedro de Alvarado. Called "The Invader" by the Mayan people, he immediately began subjugating the Indian states.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 63: Guatemala was part of the Captaincy General of Guatemala for nearly 330 years. This captaincy included what is now Chiapas in Mexico and the modern countries of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica. The colony became independent in 1821 and then became a part of the First Mexican Empire until 1823. From 1824 it was a part of the Federal Republic of Central America. When the Republic dissolved in 1841, Guatemala became fully independent of all but United Fruit Company.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 67: The progressive policies of Arévalo and Árbenz led the UFC to lobby the United States government for their overthrow, and a US-engineered coup in 1954 ended the revolution and installed a military regime. This was followed by other military governments, and jilted off a civil war that lasted from 1960 to 1996. The war saw human rights violations, including a genocide of the indigenous Maya population by the military. Following the war's end, Guatemala re-established a representative democracy. It has since struggled to enforce the rule of law and suffers a high crime rate and continued extrajudicial killings, often executed by security forces.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 75: By 1850 the natives occupied two distinct regions in the southeast and they were inspired to continue the struggle by the apparition of the "Talking Cross". This apparition, believed to be a way in which God communicated with the Maya, dictated that the War continue. Chan Santa Cruz, or Small Holy Cross became the religious and political center of the Maya resistance and the rebellion came to be infused with religious significance. Chan Santa Cruz also became the name of the largest of the independent Maya states, as well as the name of the capital city which is now the city of Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Quintana Roo. The followers of the Cross were known as the "Cruzob".
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 77: Chan Santa Cruz was the name of a shrine in Mexico of the Maya Cruzob (or Cruzoob) religious movement. It was also the name of the town that developed around it (now known as Felipe Carrillo Puerto) and, less formally, the late 19th-century indigenous Maya state, in what is now the Mexican state of Quintana Roo, of which it was the main center. This area was the center of the Caste War of Yucatán beginning in 1847, by which the Maya established some autonomous areas on the east side of the Yucatán Peninsula.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 79: All this changed after the Maya laid siege to and conquered Bacalar, originally the Mayan holy city of Bak Halal ('Decanting Water'). They summarily killed British citizens, along with the entire Yucatec 'Creoles' garrison (Reed 1964).
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 80: It is unclear why the commanding general ordered a wholesale slaughter of the garrison. Possibly he was tired of retaking the city from the more aggressive Yucateco state. Regardless, this action frightened the tiny British colonial establishment in neighboring British Honduras.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 84: The Concordat of 1854 was an international treaty between Porsche Carrera and the Holy See, signed in 1852 and ratified by both parties in 1854. Through this, Guatemala gave the education of Guatemalan people to regular orders of the Catholic Church, committed to respect ecclesiastical property and monasteries, imposed mandatory tithing and allowed the bishops to censor what was published in the country; in return, Guatemala received dispensations for the members of the army, allowed those who had acquired the properties that the liberals had expropriated from the Church in 1829 to keep those properties, received the taxes generated by the properties of the Church, and had the right to judge certain crimes committed by clergy under Guatemalan law
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 86: In 1931, the dictator general Jorge Ubico came to power, backed by the United States, and initiated one of the most brutally repressive governments in Central American history. Just as Estrada Cabrera had done during his government, Ubico created a widespread network of spies and informants and had large numbers of political opponents tortured and put to death. A wealthy aristocrat (with an estimated income of $215,000 per year in 1930s dollars) and a staunch anti-communist, he consistently sided with the United Fruit Company, Guatemalan landowners and urban elites in disputes with peasants. After the crash of the New York Stock Exchange in 1929, the peasant system established by Barrios in 1875 to jump start coffee production in the country was not good enough anymore, and Ubico was forced to implement a system of debt slavery and forced labor to make sure that there was enough labor available for the coffee plantations and that the UFCO workers were readily available.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 94: In 1951, the agrarian reform law that expropriated idle land from private hands was enacted, but in 1954, with the National Liberation Movement coup supported by the United States, most of the land that had been expropriated, was awarded back to its former landowners. Flavio Monzón was appointed mayor and in the next twenty years he became one of the largest landowners in the area. In 1964, several communities settled for decades on the shore of Polochic River claimed property titles to INTA which was created in October 1962, but the land was awarded to Monzón. A Mayan peasant from Panzós later said that Monzón "got the signatures of the elders before he went before INTA to talk about the land. When he returned, gathered the people and said that, by an INTA mistake, the land had gone to his name."
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 192: 5.Asettaa säännöt suuren valamiehistön ja eminentin toimialueen syytteeseenpanolle, suojelee oikeutta asianmukaiseen oikeudenkäyntiin ja kieltää itsesyytöxet ja kaksoisvaarallisuuden 15. joulukuuta 1791
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 193: 6.Suojelee oikeutta nopeaan julkiseen oikeudenkäyntiin valamiehistön toimesta, rikossyytöksistä ilmoittamiseen, syyttäjän kohtaamiseen, todistajien hankkimiseen ja asianajajaan 15. joulukuuta 1791
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 194: 7.Säätää oikeuden valamiehistön oikeudenkäyntiin siviilioikeudenkäynneissä 15. joulukuuta 1791
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 309: Poliittinen toiminta toi lokakuussa 1979 Havelille viiden vuoden vankeustuomion. The longest of his prison terms was nearly four years, between 1979 and 1983. 29. joulukuuta 1989 liittokokous valitsi hänet presidentiksi. Ei niin hyvää ettei jotain pahaakin. Havel oli aika lailla Walt Disneyn näköinen. Samaa lookia edusti myös presidentti Ronald McDonald.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 320: Havel was instrumental in dismantling the Warsaw Pact and enlargement of NATO membership eastward. Many of his stances and policies, such as his opposition to Slovak independence, condemnation of the treatment of Sudeten Germans, such as the expulsion of Germans from Czechoslovakia after World War II, and granting of general amnesty to all those imprisoned under the Communist era, were very controversial domestically. By the end of his presidency, he enjoyed greater popularity abroad than at home.
    xxx/ellauri273.html on line 485: Kirkossa on vuodesta 2011 alkaen ollut voimassa piispojen ohje “vapaamuotoisesta rukouksesta parisuhteensa rekisteröineiden kanssa ja anteexipyyntö heidän puolestaan”. Ohjeessa korostetaan, että kirkon työntekijän pitää antaa rukouksesta “tilanteen luonteen mukainen kuva” eli korostaa, ettei kyse ole oikeasta avioliitosta vaan sihisemisestä synnissä.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 56: Mä en kyllä ymmärrä miten striped-ass apinat käy niin kuumina tosta tappamisesta, poliisisarjoista, murhista, suurista isänmaallisista sodista ja muusta veriurheilusta. Tai siis ymmärrän, darwinistisesti, mutta en jaxa osallistua. Siitä hyvästä ansaizisin Darwin-palkinnon.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 70: Siinon joku brittiaviopari jonka mies on menettänyt plane crashissa schischelimunansa. Sakemanni vakoojan huuhtouduttua epähuomiossa niiden myrskysaaren rannalle Lucy lääxizee sen terveexi ja antaa sizen kyntää navan alta kynnettömällä sormella. Mustasukkainen rampa kaveri saa kaiken selville. Needle huomaa että britit koittaa huijata maihinnousun tapahtuvan Calais'hen. Se lähtee välittämään välittömästi tätä tietoa Wehrmachtille. Britit kuitenkin kokoavat voimansa, sopivat erimielisyytensä ja saavat Needlen hiljennettyä ja Normandian maihinnousun pysymään saxalaisilta salassa. Hahhah kyllä takuulla. Lopussa munapuoli kaveri kaatuu juuri sopivasti ja joku brittieversti pääsee lohduttaan brittimelan puutteessa elänyttä Lucya.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 72: Follett ize on prominentti Blairiitti. Hän on amatöörimuusikko ja säestää izeään Puukenkä-yhtyeessä balalaikalla. Follett lives to this day in Hartfordshire, Herefordshire, and Hampshire, where Hurriganes hardly ever happen. Aivan puuduttavan epäkiinostava kaveri. As uneventful and unchallenging as his first job at Evening News.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 74: We guarantee you will enjoy this novel. Before giving up too many spoilers, know that the story is filled with plenty of dangerous events and characters. There are too many characters to count. There are many reasons why this book is considered Ken Follett’s best book. We are looking forward to more of Follett’s upcoming books.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 89: John Boynton Priestley's first major success came with a novel, The Good Companions (1929), which earned him the James Tait Black Memorial Prize for fiction and made him a national figure. His next novel, Angel Pavement (1930), further established him as a successful novelist. However some critics were less than complimentary about his work and Priestley threatened legal action against Graham Greene for what he took to be a defamatory portrait of him in the novel Stamboul Train (1932). In 1940 he broadcast a series of short propaganda radio talks, which were credited with strengthening civilian morale during the Battle of Britain. In the following years his left-wing beliefs brought him into conflict with the government and influenced the development of the welfare state.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 105: The name Chad is boy's name of English origin meaning "battle warrior". Despite all the "hanging," "dangling," and "pregnant" chad jokes of the farcical U.S. 2000 and 2016 elections, this saint's name and remnant of the Brad-Tad era didn´t get a boost in popularity. But Chad still holds some surfer-boy appeal for a number of boomer parents.

    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 111: Putinin ja Kiinan veljeily hiljan Ukrainan vuosipäivän vaiheilla sai lännen murkkupesän kihisemään ja putinismikiihkon Hoblassa vaimenemaan muutamaxi päiväxi. Tuli muuta ajateltavaa.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 114: The US has warned this week that China was considering supplying lethal weapons to Russia, and that Chinese firms had already been supplying non-lethal dual-use technology - items which could...
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 131: China may yet persuade Putin to end his war in Ukraine

    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 179: Monet ovat kirjoittaneet Israelista ja sen historiasta, kuten Pasi Turunen ”Israel Jumalan silmäterä, maailman silmätikku” (Kuva ja Sana 2017), Rony Smolar ”Täällä Rony Smolar, Jerusalem” (Aikamedia 2017). Ester Toivonen-Siirala on kirjoittanut Israelin matkaoppaan ”Israelissa tapahtui” (Kuva ja Sana 1970), josta tämä lainaus: ”Joskus kuulee vielä sanottavan, että kibutsi on jäljitelmä kolhoosista. Se on kyllä erehdys, sillä kibutsi on täysin vapaaehtoinen ja itsenäinen yhteistalous. Se ei ole valtion synnyttämä ja ylläpitämä kuten kolhoosi.” Ester Toivonen-Siiralan tunnemme siitä, koska hän voitti ylähampaisesti Miss Suomi -kilpailun 1933 ja oli tönkkö elokuvanäyttelijä. Esteristä lilsää tuonnempana.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 257: Kansantalouden korkeimman neuvoston puhemiehistö myönsi 16. maaliskuuta 1922 erityisiä varoja entisöintitöihin, mutta ne eivät johtaneet mihinkään. Vuonna 1925 Ekibastuzin kaivokset tuhottiin, tehtaat purettiin, kiskot, laitteet ja liikkuva kalusto myytiin.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 363: Ei tää ole politiikkaa, tää on ihan normi vapaudenriistoa. Jumala! Pelasta! Älä anna mulle salakuljetuksesta karsseria! Yliopistossakin oli karsseri, ja Norssissa. Vittu on Jumalan pelastusmiehistöllä hommia. Kai se on sille jo ihan rikkiä. Iivana ei lukenut enää kiitosrukousta. (Kiitos. Anteexi. Ole hyvä. Taas tätä pelleilyä.) Kuupallinen soppaa on vangille kalliimpi vapautta. No se ei Maslovia juuri yllätä, vapaus on tarvepyramidin ihan huipulla. Kaikkein vittumaisinta on että paketin saajan täytyy valvojasta alkaen antaa, antaa ja antaa. Ihan kuin verotuxessa, omastaan joutuu antamaan ansiottomille. Jos sais edes ize päättää antaako, paljonko ja kenelle, se ois charityä.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 410: Tansanian esihistorialliset löydöt ulottuvat pisimmälle Olduvain rotkossa. Sieltä on löytynyt nykyihmisen edeltäjien jäänteitä, joista vanhimmat on ajoitettu yli kahden miljoonan vuoden ikäisiksi. Nekin olivat varmuudella mutiaisia, vaikka kallot valkeita. Serengeti elää, huonossa hapessa. Kilimandjaron lumet sulavat.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 422: Palkinto tuli pistämättömästä mutta myötätuntoisesta penetraatiosta. Gurnah has criticized the practices in both British and American publishing that want to "make the alien seem alien" by marking "foreign" terms and phrases with italics or by putting them in a glossary. Onkos se joku ylläri. Felicity Hand observes that Gurnah´s characters typically do not succeed abroad following their migration, using irony and humour to respond to their situation. Talk to the hand. The first translator of his novels into Swahili, academic Dr Ida Hadjivayanis of the School of Oriental and African Studies, has said: "I think if his work could be read in East Africa it would have such an impact. ... maybe fewer coons would try to swim over to the West." Gurnah was the first Black writer to receive the prize since 1993, when Toni Morrison won it, and the first African writer since 1991, when Nadine Gordimer was the recipient, making him the first black guy to make it.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 428: Gurnah still lives in Zanzibar in his mind, and prefers it that way. When he returns home, he is frustrated by the discrepancy between the stories he invented—and started to half believe—and the dreary realities. The house of his parents is close to decay; essential services like water, electricity, and garbage disposal fail regularly. In addition, his schoolmates have become corrupt, self-seeking bureaucrats, and his mother was not gallantly courted but given as a pawn to his father. And yet, he never found the courage to inform his parents that he has been living together with a white infidel—a "kafir woman." When he is introduced to the child-wife who his relatives chose for him, he panics and flees "home," which is now England, only to find that Emma left and that he is condemned to be "on the edges of everything," on his own island in England. The hero despairs of establishing communication between the two worlds. Vaimo läx. Lammaskaalta.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 439: Jälkeenpäin Jusuf ei muistanut mitä sanottiin, mutta Allah mainittiin. Kahlil Gibranista tulee Jusufin pomo. Jusufista tulee kifa urongo, undead. Rahimahullah, lord have mercy on his soul. In the Arab world, sayyid is the equivalent of the English word "mylord", "bwana" or "massa". Ihmissuhteet elävät helevetin 1. leveyspiirillä, vpervom kruge. Muilla piireillä on vielä pahempaa.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 447: Oud or Oudh is by far one of the most expensive raw fragrance ingredients in the world. Also known as agarwood, this essential oil is extracted from the fungus-infected resinous heartwood of the agar tree, which is primarily found in the dense forests of Southeast Asia, India and Bangladesh. It is worth 1.5 times its weight in gold. It is an endangered species.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 500: Sotasalaisuudet ovat syvältä. Vakoojat tekevät suuren palveluxen apinalajille levittämällä yxien pahisten salaisuudet koko joukolle. Sellainen oli pyöreärillinen sittemmim harppisaku Klaus Fuchs, joka välitti USAn atomipommisalaisuuxia ryssille. Missähän nyt oltaisiin jos ne olis jääneet vain jenkeille, jotka lypsivät samat tiedot omilta sakuiltaan Mnhätn-projektissa. Jos ryssät ei olis panneet hudaan sakuille suuressa isänmaallisessa sodassa, pommi olisi nyt sakuilla, Britannia ennallistettuna villieläinlaitumexi, ja me oltais kaikki hyvixiä exnazeja.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 502: Tietojen arvo Neuvostoliiton projektiin oli arvaamaton. Hans Bethe sanoi kerran, että Klaus Fuchs oli ainoa fyysikko, jonka hän tiesi todella muuttaneen historiaa. Koska neuvostoprojektin johtaja paha Lavrenti Beria käytti ulkomaista tiedustelutietoa ize keittiössä sen sijaan, että olisi antanut niitä tutkijoille, koska hän ei luottanut tutkijoihin oletuksena, ei tiedetä, olivatko Fuchsin fissiotiedoilla hänen proggixiinsa merkittävä vaikutus. Ottaen huomioon, että Neuvostoliiton ohjelman tahdin määräsi ensisijaisesti uraanin määrä, jonka se pystyi hankkimaan, tutkijoiden oli vaikea arvioida tarkasti, kuinka paljon aikaa säästyi.
    xxx/ellauri280.html on line 504: Anthony Cave Brownin ja Charles B. MacDonaldin Cominternin (kommunistisen internationaalin) historian On a Field of Red mukaan Fuchsin suurin panos Neuvostoliitolle saattoi olla paljastaa, kuinka uraania voitaisiin käsitellä käytettäväksi pommissa. Fuchs antoi Goldille tammikuussa 1945 teknisiä tietoja, jotka hankittiin vasta kahden vuoden kokeilun jälkeen hintaan 400 miljoonaa dollaria. Fuchs paljasti myös uraanin tai plutoniumin määrän, jonka amerikkalaiset aikoivat käyttää kussakin atomipommissa.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 48: Odessa jälleen lumoihisi jään.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 163: Biletskyi V.S., Hayko G.I., Orlovskyi V.M. Öljyn ja kaasun tuotannon historia ja näkymät: Opinto-opas. — Kharkova–Kiova, NTU "KhPI"; Kiova, NTUU "Igor Sikorskyn mukaan nimetty KPI": FOP Khalikov R. Kh., 2019. — 302 s. ISBN 978-617-7565-25-2
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 229: – Meidän historiallinen alueemme, jonkun keskustelijoista kuullaan sanovan taustalla.

    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 374: Pubic Hair Stage 1: This is the stage before puberty starts. There are no pubic hairs at this time.

    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 469: Vesku oli tunnettu värikkäästä naishistoriastaan. Naimisiin hän meni kolmesti ja sai lapsia kolmen eri naisen kanssa. Sotkuisen perintöriidan lisäksi hämmennystä herättää Vesa-Matin vanhimman elossa olevan pojan Ukon oudot rahasotkut. Ukko on viettänyt värikästä elämää, ja hänen osoitteensa on vaihtunut useaan otteeseen. Nyt hän asuu ulkomailla.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 488: More interested in sports than in studying, Miller got into the University of Michigan, where he began writing plays and sharpened his interest in radical politics — an interest that would lead to his testimony before the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1956. (Miller had attended Communist Party meetings but said he had not been a member; he was convicted of contempt of Congress, a charge later dismissed, for not naming others who had attended.)
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 490: In 1938, Miller received his bachelor´s degree in English. He married his college sweetheart, Mary Slattery, in 1940. They had two children, Jane and Robert. Miller was exempted from military service during World War II because of an old football injury. Näitä potkupallovammasia elämäntaiteilijoita on muitakin, esim Ploiri ja sen elämäkerturi Jari Tervo.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 521: Monroe was rebounding from her unhappy nine-month marriage to DiMaggio. Miller was preparing to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee, and his own marriage had long been troubled. As the demonically quotable Kazan had earlier put it: “He was starved for sexual relief.”
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 523: Arthur Miller was 35 and at the top of his career when, in 1951, he first set eyes on Marilyn Monroe. He was the author of “All My Sons” and “Death of a Salesman,” the first play to win all three major drama prizes (the Pulitzer Prize, the Tony Award and the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award). He would soon begin work on “The Upokas.” She was 24 and, except for her glorious behind, virtually unknown.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 527: The public didn’t exactly applaud this match. Gossip columnists fixated on, as Mr. Bigsby puts it, “a red in bed with America’s snow queen.” Mailer famously snarked that “the Great American Brain” had met “the Great American Body.”
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 531: Miller would give up his career to help guide hers, and he spent years working on “The Misfits,” directed by John Huston, for which he wrote the screenplay and she would star. On the set she’d be hospitalized and, around this time, have an affair with Yves Montand. The couple got a Mexican divorce in 1961; Miller would marry the Magnum photographer Inge Morath, whom he met during the filming.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 533: With Monroe out of the picture — she died in 1962 — Mr. Bigsby pretty much folds up this big, busy tent. Miller went on to write important plays, notably “After the Fall” (1964), but his best work was in the distant rearview mirror.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 535: The long, strange, elegiac ballad of Arthur Miller and Marilyn Monroe — one that would end for her in miscarriages, bottles of pills and increasingly erratic behavior, and for him in a long gap in his theater career — takes up only a few chapters of “Arthur Miller: 1915-1962,” Christopher Bigsby’s sober and meteor-size new biography. But they are crucial chapters. The book moves inexorably toward Monroe’s appearance; her magnetism sucks everything rapidly toward it. Miller’s long life (1915-2005) can be cleaved neatly into B.M. and A.M. — before Marilyn and after.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 645: al-Hamdānī, in full Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥasan ibn Aḥmad al-Hamdānī, (born 893?, Sanaa, Yemen—died c. 945?), Arab geographer, poet, grammarian, historian, and astronomer whose chief fame derives from his authoritative writings on South Arabian history and geography. From his literary production al-Hamdānī was known as the “tongue of South Arabia.”
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 646: Most of al-Hamdānī’s life was spent in Arabia itself. He was widely educated, and he traveled extensively, acquiring a broad knowledge of his country. He became involved in a number of political controversies. When he was imprisoned for one of them, his influence was sufficient to invoke a tribal rebellion in his behalf to secure his release.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 648: His encyclopaedia Al-Iklīl (“The Crown”; Eng. trans. of vol. 8 by N.A. Faris as The Antiquities of South Arabia) and his other writings are a major source of information on Arabia, providing a valuable anthology of South Arabian poetry as well as much genealogical, topographical, and historical information. “Al-Dāmighah” (“The Cleaving”), a qaṣīdah, is perhaps his most famous poem; in it he defends his own southern tribe, the Hamdān. It has been said that al-Hamdānī died in prison in Sanaa in 945, but this is now in question.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 724: John Train, Paris Review Co-Founder and Cold War Operative, sentään kuoli 94-vuotiaana 2022, onnexi. His career, ranging from literature to finance to war, and from France to Afghanistan, seemed to cover every interest and issue of his exalted social class. Yet he was also an operator in high finance and world affairs who, by one researcher’s account, had ties to U.S. secret services. Mr. Train founded and ran a leading financial firm devoted to preserving the money of rich families, and he worked to support the mujahedeen in their fight against the Soviet Union in the 1980s. The Guardian reported that Train, Smith had $375 million under management in 1984. In 1986, Fortune magazine wrote that Mr. Train’s firm “claims to be the largest in New York serving rich families.” Mr. Train’s books on investing were praised as riveting in The New York Times and “classic” in The Wall Street Journal. Among them were several about successful financiers, whom he referred to as “money masters,” and their techniques. He treated his political interests less jokingly. A committed cold warrior, he wrote for The Wall Street Journal about military affairs. He became concerned that the conspiracy-monger Lyndon LaRouche was a “possible Soviet agent.” (Lyndon began in far-left politics but in the 1970s moved to the far right and antisemitism.)
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 726: A yet murkier side of Mr. Train’s political engagement was documented in Joel Whitney’s 2016 book, “Finks: How the C.I.A. Tricked the World’s Best Writers,” a history of connections between Paris Review founders and intelligence agencies. Drawing on a collection of Mr. Train’s papers at Seton Hall University and two interviews with him, Mr. Whitney wrote that in the 1980s Mr. Train used a “shell nonprofit to foster schemes” furthering U.S. “intelligence and propaganda missions” in Afghanistan. Mr. Train ran an organization, the Afghanistan Relief Committee, which presented itself as largely devoted to helping refugees and offering other forms of humanitarian aid, but a study by the left-leaning Institute for Policy Studies found that its budget was spent largely on “media campaigns.” Vanhuxena John Train koitti lukea hankkimiaan afgaanimattoja.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 730: On the subject of oligarchy and the treasure storehouses which oligarchs build for themselves, Alexei Navalny´s video reveals that he’s following a U.S. and NATO script, google translated into Russian. Navalny is of Russian and Ukrainian descent. His father is from Zalissia, a former village near the Belarus border that was relocated due to the Chernobyl disaster in Ivankiv Raion, Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine. Navalny grew up in Obninsk, about 100 kilometres (62 mi) southwest of Moscow, but spent his childhood summers with his grandmother in Ukraine, acquiring proficiency in the Ukrainian language.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 732: Navalny’s idea is that Putin is the single mastermind of Russian rule and that he dictates to the oligarchs the tribute they should pay–in treasure for him to accumulate and display for himself, his friends and girlfriends in private. This is an Anglo-American cartoon about how oligarchy works everywhere, including the UK and the U.S.–in Russia in particular.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 739: For his evidence, Michels focused on the politics of the democratic and socialist parties in Europe, including the British; and on the administrative bureaucracies of those states. He ignored commercial corporations except for those in the U.S.; there he observed “the existence of an aristocracy of millionaires, railway kings, oil kings, cattle kings, etc., is now indisputable.” For Michels, aristocracy was synonymous with oligarchy.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 747: Hän on myös sukua Sergei Kara-Murzalle (s. 1939), Neuvostoliiton/venäläiselle historioitsijalle, kemistille ja filosofille. He ovat Kara-Murza- suvun jäseniä, Moskovaan asettuneen ja kristinuskoon 1400-luvulla jKr. kääntyneen tataariaristokraatin jälkeläisiä. (Nimi käännöksessä tarkoittaa "musta herra".)
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 748: Kara-Murza suoritti BA- ja MA-tutkinnon länsihistoriasta Cambridgen yliopistossa. Karaa jää suremaan vaimo Jevgenia ja kolme lasta.
    xxx/ellauri281.html on line 780: Liveblogimme on raportoinut jatkuvasti ja kattavasti Euroopan suurimman sodan puhkeamisesta sitten vuoden 1945. Tiedämme, että on tärkeää pysyä kanavalla loppuun asti. Liitytkö meihin? Siellä olemista ei voi korvata – ja pysymme maassa, merellä ja ilmassa, kuten teimme vuoden 1917 Venäjän vallankumouksen, 1930-luvun Ukrainan nälänhädän, Neuvostoliiton romahtamisen vuonna 1991 ja ensimmäisen Venäjän ja Ukrainan välisen konfliktin vuonna 2014 aikana. Meillä on kuuluisa, 200-vuotinen historia puolueellisesta kumikaulailusta kaikkialla Euroopassa läpitte mullistusten, rauhan ja kaiken siltä väliltä. Emme anna periksi nyt. Teetkö muutoksen ja tuetko myös meitä? Etkö tue?
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 86: SOFI OKSASEN (s. 1977) kulttikirjaksi muodostunut feministinen esikoisteos kipeistä aiheista, syömishäiriöstä, virolaisnaisten asemasta ja ryssävihasta. Stalinin lehmät tarkastelee ankarasti Viron lähihistoriaa sekä virolaisäidin ja suomalaisisän tytärtä henkisessä puristuksessa.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 93: Sofi Oksanen piti puheensa tänään Lillehammerissa. Sofi Oksanen piti puheensa tänään Lillehammerissa. Elettiin vuotta 2016, SSS-hallituxen aikoja. Vihreiden silloinen puheenjohtaja Ville Niinistö luonnehti ryhmäpuheenvuorossaan hallitusohjelmaa poikkeuksellisen oikeistolaiseksi: "Hallitusohjelmaansa esittelevä hallitus on perusoikeistolainen hallitus. Sitä on myös luonnehdittu ohjelmaltaan republikaaniseksi. Ensimmäistä kertaa Suomen historiassa meillä on hallitus, joka tietoisesti haluaa supistaa julkisen vallan vastuuta ihmisistä." Vasemmistoliiton silloinen puheenjohtaja Paavo Arhinmäki painotti ryhmäpuheenvuorossaan hallituksen poikkeamista vaalilupauksistaan: "Valtiovarainministeriön omienkin laskelmien mukaan eläkeläisiin, lapsiperheisiin ja työttömiin kohdistuu eniten leikkauksia hallitusohjelmassa. Jos hallitusohjelmaa käsiteltäisiin käräjäoikeudessa, olisi rikosnimike todennäköisesti törkeä petos."
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 99: Julkaisin vuonna 2003 Suomessa esikoisromaanini, Viron lähihistoriaa käsittelevän Stalinin lehmät. Törmäsin toimittajiin, jotka kutsuivat kirjaani “neuvostovastaiseksi”, suomettuneen Suomen perussanastoon kuuluvalla, aikoinaan hyvinkin negatiivisella määreellä.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 103: Se, että Viron miehityksestä ja neuvostoelämän realiteeteista liikkui paljon totuutena pidettyjä valheita, oli tavallista arkea. Olin kasvanut maailmassa, jossa miehittäjä oli päässyt kirjoittamaan Viron historian mieleisekseen ja neuvostopropagandan jäljet ulottuivat myös Neuvostoliiton rajojen ulkopuolelle.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 108: Vaikka olin toki tietoisesti kirjoittamassa juuri romaania, Viron lähihistoria päätyi sen aiheeksi vahingossa, ja käsitys siitä, että aihepiiri oli tärkeä, vahvistui vasta kirjoittamisen myötä.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 110: Uudelleenitsenäistyneessä Virossa lähihistorian käsittely oli yhä polttavan ajankohtaista, mutta ikätoverini Suomessa pitivät Neuvostoliittoa aiheena, joka oli menneen talven lumia.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 112: Venäjää ei nähty imperiumina eikä osattu kuvitella, että se aikoisi yhä harjoittaa imperialistista politiikkaansa, vaikka samaan aikaan se sotkeutui jatkuvasti Baltian maiden pyrkimykseen kirjoittaa omaa historiaansa ja osoittautui hyvin hankalaksi ja neuvottelutahdottomaksi osapuoleksi esimerkiksi rajojen vahvistamisen suhteen. No se nyt olikin tosi naivia, talousjärjestelmä ja reviirin valvonta on 2 eri asiaa.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 116: Esimerkiksi Ukrainan ex­presidentti Viktor Janukovitsh suhtautui lähihistorian hutkimiseen aggressiivisesti, joten vasta hänen syrjäyttämisensä mahdollisti sen, että historiantutkijat pääsivät jälleen rauhassa vanhan kunnon historian uudelleenkirjoitustyön pariin.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 119: Hänen mukaansa Ukrainan tilanteen kriisiytymisen yksi syy oli se, että viimeisen 25 vuoden aikana Ukraina ei analysoinut historiaansa eikä kehittänyt työkaluja, joilla selvittäisiin totalitarismin seurauksista. Nyt vapaaehtoisvoimin koottu ja ylläpidetty elektroninen arkisto tarjoaa kaikille pääsyn KGB-arkistoihin. Mutta tähän tilanteeseen pääsy vei vuosikymmeniä ja edessä on paljon työtä.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 127: Kirja vastaa myös kysymyksiin siitä, miksi neuvostoaikaiseen ns. historiantutkimukseen ja sen tuloksiin ei voi luottaa sokeasti, ja painottaa lähdekritiikin merkitystä. Neuvostoliitossa historia oli väline, joilla oikeutettiin miehitys (toisinkuin lännessä, haha!) ja neuvostohistorian tutkimuksen metodit vain imitoivat tieteellisen tutkimuksen metodeja.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 161: Lukemani kirjat ja näkemäni elokuvat eivät käsitelleet Viron lähihistoriaa tai Neuvostoliittoa niin, että olisin tunnistanut itse kokemani Neuvostoliiton, siis samalla lailla kuin Amerikan mainstream-ohjelmistosta tunnistaa todellisen USA:n. Tunnistettava Viron lähihistoria siirtyi tuolloin sukupolvelta toisella oraalisen tradition kautta, ei kirjoitetun. Se siirtyi rivien välien kautta.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 165: Minulla olisi ollut konkreettinen vertailukohta aivan samalla tavalla kuin jo nuorena osasin pitää naisten asemaa taidehistoriassa epäoikeudenmukaisena, mutta sitäkään en olisi osannut konkretisoida sanoiksi, korkeintaan tunteeksi epäoikeudenmukaisuudesta, ellei minulla olisi ollut saatavilla kirjoja, joissa asiaa käsiteltiin, tai elleivät naistaiteilijat ja -kirjailijat olisi puhuneet julkisesti asiasta.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 177: Hänen pohdiskelut merkistä paljastavat, kuinka vaikeaa on ymmärtää jonkin asian koko historia vain sitä tarkkailemalla. Ihmishenkiä kuitenkin määrittelee menetys – jopa niinkin arvokkaat esineet kuin jalokivet katoavat. Hänen viittauksensa Tubeen osoittaa erityistä ambivalenssia teknologiaa ja nykyajan yrityksiä hallita luontoa ja rakentaa tehokasta teollista elämää kohtaan.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 179: Kertoja tajuaa, että merkki ei ole reikä ja ihmettelee , onko se ruusunlehti. Hän vertaa vaippareunuksen pölyä pölyyn, joka hautasi Troyn, ja pitää itseään köyhänä taloudenhoitajana. Puu koputtaa ikkunaa ulkona, ja kertoja kuvaa Shakespearen istumassa nojatuolissa hänen kaltaisensa tulen edessä ja toivottelevansa keskeytyksetöntä elämää. Hänen Shakespearea koskeva historiallinen fiktionsa kyllästää häntä, ja hän kaipaa päästä miellyttävään ajatusketjuun, joka heijastaisi häntä hyvin.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 185: Viittaus minäkuvaan on ironista, sillä kertoja antaa hyvin vähän yksityiskohtia elämästään tässä tietoisuuden virrassa – jos tämä "romantisoitu kuva" kuitenkin viittaa hänen ajatuksiinsa oppineista miehistä ja sivilisaatiosta, myöhempi kuva tuntemattomista ihmisistä. Omnibussi vahvistaa tuossa sivilisaatiossa todellisuudessa esiintyvän vieraantuneisuuden ja anonymiteetin. Hänen hyppynsä yleistyksiin herättää jälleen kiehtovan sodan, vaikka hänen kyynisyytensä sivilisaatiosta johtaa heikkoon toivoon. Jos nykyiset tavat ovat vain "pukutettuja" versioita todellisuudesta, ajan kuluminen sallii muutokset tässä todellisuudessa ja vapautumispotentiaalin.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 187: No joo, onhan siinä sepustusta. Minä luin tekstin kehotuksena katsella arkea tuorein silmin ja kirjoittaa elämän pienimmistä yksityiskohdista. Tulkinnastani huolimatta en nähnyt Viron historiaa kirjallisena aiheena. Vaikka olihan vallankumouxessa nimenomaan kysymys omaisuuden menetyxestä, ellei ize sattunut olemaan pennitön prole.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 192: Virginia Woolfin täplä seinässä paljastui lopulta etanaksi. Se on hyvä vertaus myös omalle suhteelleni Viron lähihistoriasta kirjoittamiseen: vasta sateella kotiloonsa kätkeytynyt etana tulee näkyviin ja näyttää sarvensa, ja juuri niin kävi minulle.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 193: Vapaampi ilmapiiri eli sade mahdollisti sen, että löysin kielen Viron lähihistorialle. Ensin aihe livahti romaanikäsikirjoitukseeni metaforien ja symbolien muodossa, toisin sanoen juuri rivien välien kautta, joilla olin tottunut käsittelemään asiaa, ja vähitellen niiden avulla löysin kielen, jolla kirjoittaa aiheesta suoraan russofobista vihapuhetta. 2000-luvun alku oli siihen sopiva hetki, 9/11 jälkeen Bushin aikoihin ei tarvinnut vihapuhetta paljon hävetä.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 197: Vuosituhannen vaiheessa Venäjästä kirjoittava kirjailija sai kuitenkin vielä kirjoittaa Venäjästä ja sen historiapolitiikasta täysin rauhassa. Vaikka törmäsin jälkisuomettuneisiin äänensävyihin, Venäjästä kirjoittavat kirjailijat tai toimittajat eivät vielä kohdanneet ilmiöitä, joiden kanssa näillä saroilla sananvapauttaan käyttävät ihmiset joutuivat tekemisiin vain joitakin vuosia myöhemmin. Pro-Putin -mielenosoittajia ei näkynyt eikä Viron Moskovan-suurlähettiläästä, sittemmin ulkoministeristä, venäläis-latvialaisesta Marina Kaljurandista, tehty rivoja nukkeja Moskovassa, kuten vuonna 2007. Vaikka kyyditys- tai miehitys-sanojen käyttö ei ollut yhtä luontevaa kuin nykyään ja toisinaan niiden kanssa haparoitiin, kukaan ei Suomessa vielä kieltänyt kyydityksiä, kuten vain vähän myöhemmin kävi. Niitähän tehtailtiin Suomessakin 30-luvulla.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 202: Vuonna 2007 Viron lähihistoriasta kertova näytelmäni Puhdistus sai kantaesityksensä Suomen kansallisteatterissa, ja paria kuukautta myöhemmin pronssisotilaskiista kuumensi ja kylmensi tunteita Virossa.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 206: Patsaasta tuli symboli, joka konkretisoi erilaiset näkemykset historiasta.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 229: 2000-luku oli aikaa, jolloin Itä-Euroopan ja Baltian maissa palautettiin historiantutkimus jälleen historiantutkimukseksi, ei itä- vaan länsipropagandan työkaluksi, vakiinnutettiin sen työkaluja ja luotiin perustaa lähihistorian tutkimukselle.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 232: Samaan aikaan perestroikan ja Boris Jeltsinin aikana perustetut Gulag-historiaa dokumentoivat järjestöt, kuten Memorial, ovat Venäjällä joutuneet tilanteeseen, jossa niiden toimintaa vaikeutetaan jatkuvasti, ja ne on leimattu “ulkomaisiksi agenteiksi”.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 236: Suomessa aktivoitui Pro-Putin-ryhmä, joka ryhtyi julkaisemaan kirjoja, perusti yhdistyksiä ja järjesti keskustelutilaisuuksia, joissa toisteltiin vanhoja neuvostoteesejä. Erityisesti heitä kiinnosti Viron historia: miehityksen ja kyyditysten kieltäminen. Suomalainen media hämmentyi.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 239: Kun minä ja kirjailija Imbi Paju julkaisimme vuonna 2010 Viron lähihistoriaa käsittelevän artikkelikokoelman Kaiken takana oli russofobia, Yhtenäinen Venäjä, Putinin puolue, teki lehdistötiedotteen, jossa kirja määriteltiin russofobiseksi – ja vanhaan kunnon neuvostotyyliin tiedote lähetettiin ulos jo ennen kuin itse kirja oli ulkona ja ennen kuin Yhtenäinen Venäjä olisi edes voinut tutustua kirjan sisältöön.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 242: Se, että Viron lähihistorian käsittely oli Venäjälle hankala asia, ei sinänsä ollut uutta. Venäjä myönsi 1990-luvun alussa julkisesti miehittäneensä Viron, mutta Jeltsinin vuosien jälkeen Venäjä on jatkuvasti pyrkinyt tuomaan esille omaa tulkintaansa Viron neuvostovuosista, kieltänyt miehityksen, pyrkinyt rehabilitoimaan Molotov-Ribbentropin sopimusta ja häirinnyt esimerkiksi kyydittäjien oikeudenkäyntejä Virossa.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 302: Kirjassani historialliseen henkilöön pohjautuva Edgar työskentelee KGB:lle – ja myös Kodumaa-lehdelle, joka oli KGB:n menestyksekäs projekti: lehdeksi naamioitu vaikutusväline, joka oli kohdistettu ulkomailla asuvaan vironkieliseen väestöön. Kyseessä oli ainoa vironkielinen julkaisu, jota sai tilata ulkomaille.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 330: Sosiaalisen median ja perinteisen median talousvaikeuksien ja henkilöstövajauksen vuoksi se asettaa tavallisen kansalaisen tilanteeseen, jossa medianlukutaidon merkitys on valtava ja jossa meillä jokaisella on vastuu siitä, levitämmekö eteenpäin uutisia – vai valeuutisia. [Kai jo jaoit tämän jutun kontakteillesi? Kai sallit TS:lle pääsyn yhteystietoihisi? Jos et, tee se heti! Setä Sam luottaa sinuun!]
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 363: Ottaen huomioon Viron ja Suomen historian, maiden nopea nousu sananvapausindeksin kärkisijoille on merkittävää, ellei peräti hämmästyttävää.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 373: Merkittävä osa merkittävistä venäläisistä kirjailijoista on muuttanut ulkomaille. Merkittävä kirjailija Mihail Shishkinin mukaan merkittävä ero neuvostoaikaan on se, että nyt toisinajattelijat nimenomaan halutaan pois maasta. Hah, kyllä ne haluttiin pois maasta neuvostoaikanakin, mutteivät ne lähteneet, tarrasivat synnyinmaahan kuin Tintin laastari.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 376: Šiškin (kirjoitetaan usein Shishkin) on ainoana venäläiskirjailijana voittanut kaikki maansa arvostetuimmat kirjallisuuspalkinnot, mm. Vuoden esikoisen 1993, Venäjän Bookerin 2000, Valtakunnallisen bestsellerin 2005 ja Suuri kirja -palkinnon 2006.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 377: Teoxia: Sota vai rauha: kirjoituxia lännestä. Šiškiniä on verrattu muiden muassa Orhan Pamukiin ja J. M. Coetzeehen. Vuodesta 1995 Šiškin on asunut Sveitsissä. Hän kirjoittaa myös saksaksi. Vuonna 1995 Shishkin muutti Sveitsiin perhesyistä. Hän työskenteli Zürichissä maahanmuuttoministeriössä ja erityisesti pakolaisten parissa venäjän ja saksan kääntäjänä. Hän on naimisissa kääntäjänsä kanssa (Zhenjya, kuvassa). Hänellä on Sveitsin kansalaisuus. Sen vaimo Zhenya pitelee sen päätä ettei se käänny enempää vasemmalle. Zhenya on sen kääntäjä. Vähän väliä käydään kääntymässä USA:ssa propagandaretkillä Harrimanin kustannuxella. W Averell Harriman, better known as Averell (Pää kiinni, Averell! Anna sen sytytyslangan olla, Averell!) Rautatieparoni E. H. Harrimanin poika, Harriman toimi Neuvostoliiton suurlähettiläänä ja osallistui suuriin toisen maailmansodan konferensseihin. Isänsä rahoilla hän perusti WA Harriman & Co -pankkitoiminnan vuonna 1922. Harrimanilla oli 3 erittäinkin lukratiivista avioliittoa. Harriman veti naruja, jotta hänen tyttärensä Kathleen voisi seurata häntä Neuvostoliittoon palvelemaan hänen avustajanaan. Kaksi kolmasosaa Yhdysvaltojen viereisen talven trumpetistijoutsenista viettää kauden Harriman State Parkissa.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 382: Hänen uusi romaaninsa Neittokiva puhuu tärkeimmästä aiheesta: kuinka voittaa kuolema rakkaudella. Mixi kuolemaa pitäis ylipäänsä voittaa? Talousliberaalit ei osaa muusta puhua kuin voitosta. Kriitikot May ja Kucherskaya kuvaili Shishkinin romaania seuraavasti: "Neittokiva on loistava romaani sanasta ja kielestä, joka tulee pehmeäksi ja tottelevaiseksi mestarin käsissä. Se voi luoda minkä tahansa muun todellisuuden, joka on upeampi ja upeampi. Uskottava, että todellinen maailma. Kuilu sanan ja tosiasian, todellisuuden ja sen ihmiskielelle käännöksen välillä on todellinen sisäisen jännitteen pesä romaanissa. Sen venäjä alkaa kyllä olla vähän vanhakantaista." Boris Dralyuk kirjoitti The Times Literary Supplementissaettä "Shishkinin ihmeellinen eruditio, kapea ilmaisu ja taipumus yleiseen leikkiin ovat hänen taiteensa silmiinpistäviä osia... Nämä ominaisuudet todellakin yhdistävät hänet Nabokovin kanssa, samoin kuin hänen uskonsa kirjoitetun sanan voimaan: "Tarina on käsi, ja sinä olet käsine. Tarinat muuttavat sinua, kuten käsineet. Sinun on ymmärrettävä, että tarinat ovat eläviä olentoja, kuten käsineet."
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 384: The Guardian vielä kirjoitti: "Molemmat romaanit yrittävät edustaa monitahoista todellisuutta, ja joskus on sietämätöntä intensiteettiä, kun metaforat versovat ja vääntelevät. niissä on selkeästi venäläinen sävy, Neitsythiiren hengästyminen muuttuu valossa ja pimeässä mitatummaksi loistoksi; Shishkinin tehtävän kiireellisyyttä ei himmennetä. Tšehov välitti inhimillisyyttään - ettei tekstissäsi voi olla täysin negatiivisia hahmoja. Ja Tolstoilta opin, että ei pelätä olla naiivi.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 386: Shishkin vastustaa avoimesti Venäjän nykyistä hallitusta ja arvostelee jyrkästi Vladimir Putinin sisä- ja ulkopolitiikkaa, mukaan lukien Krimin liittäminen vuonna 2014.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 387: Shishkin vertaa kirjoitusprosessia verensiirtoon: "Jaan lukijani kanssa elämän tärkeimmän olemuksen. Mutta meillä on oltava sama veriryhmä." Hän vastusti Venäjän vuoden 2022 hyökkäystä Ukrainaan ja kirjoitti The Guardianissa, että "Putin tekee hirviömäisiä rikoksia kansani, maani ja ennen kaikkea minun nimissä" ja sanoi, että "Putinin Venäjällä on mahdotonta hengittää. Poliisin haju. Kenkä on liian vahva. Täältä alpeilta käryn näkee selvästi haistamattakin."
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 500: Eesti vapp on meidän isosedän herttuallinen vaakuna. Vanim Eesti vapp pärineb ajavahemikust 1583, mil kolme leopardse lõviga hertsogivapp tähistas Rootsi kuninga Johan III Liivimaa hertsogi tiitlit. Leopardit on vasempaan päinkazovia leijonia, passant gardant. Ei sentään trabant. Kolme leijonaa on peräisin Tanskan kuninkaan Valdemar II:n käsivarresta , joka valloitti Pohjois-Viron vuonna 1219. Leijonista tuli osa Tallinnan (Rääveli), Tanskan hallituksen keskuksen suurempaa vaakunaa.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 530: Sofi Oksasta ja Olga Tokarczukia on verrattu toisiinsa: molemmilla on rastastukka ja siinä pidennys. Molemmat tematisoivat historiaan toistumista nykyisyydessä. Myös se on heillä yhteistä, että molemmat ovat autodidakteja. (No ei, ainoastaan Sofi on, Olga valmistui kai psykologixi.) Heidän naispäähenkilöidensä kautta historia muuttuu autofiktioksi.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 541: Bulimia on yleisempää niillä, joilla on lähisukulainen äiti, jolla on sairaus. Genetiikasta johtuvan riskin prosentuaalinen osuus on 30–80%. Muita taudin riskitekijöitä ovat psykologinen stressi, kulttuurinen paine saavuttaa tietty vartalotyyppi, huono itsetunto ja liikalihavuus. Eläminen virolaisessa kulttuurissa, joka kaupallistaa tai hohdottaa laihduttamisen ja korkokengät, ja painoon kiinnittyvien fasististen vanhempien hahmot ovat myös riskejä.
    xxx/ellauri286.html on line 550: BPD on luokiteltu DSMssä dramaattisiin persoonallisuushäiriöihin, jossa on antisosiaalinen, histrioninen ja narsistinen persoonallisuushäiriö. Naisilla se diagnosoidaan noin kolme kertaa niin usein kuin miehillä.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 98: Lähistöllä on Neapolis (nykyisin Kavala), Kreikan kaunein mannersatama, jonne Paavali saapui tähän kaupunkiin tupakalle työtovereidensa Timoteuksen ja Silaan kanssa (kuva yllä, Apostolien teot 16). Matkalla takaisin Thessalonikiin kuljet Amfipoliksen ja Apollonian muinaisten kaupunkien läpi, kuten Paavali teki (Apostolien teot 17).
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 123:
    Muinainen teatteri Delphissä, Kreikassa

    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 138: Kävele samoja polkuja, joita Sokrates, Platon ja Aristoteles kulkivat vuosisatoja aiemmin. Katso maailman vanhin näytelmäpaikka, Dionysoksen teatteri, ja tutustu siihen, miten pyhissä kirjoituksissa käytetään muinaisten draamien kuvia. Pysähdy Panhellenic-stadionilla, josta modernit olympialaiset alkoivat. Nauti kansallispuutarhojen ja Kreikan parlamenttirakennuksen luonnonkauneudesta ja jätä aikaa matkamuisto-ostoksille Plakassa.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 206: Ärsymyksestä, myötätunnosta tai jopa oikeudenmukaisuuden tunteesta Paavali lopulta kääntyi ja käski hengen jättää hiänet. Se on Paavalin tunnereaktion kuvaus, joka auttaa vahvistamaan tarinan historiallisuuden. Luke ei yritä lisätä tarinaan muita, ehkä uskonnollisempia tunteita. Paavalin käskyn onnistumisesta todistaa se tosiasia, että henki totteli ja jätti hiänet.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 241: Shokkiuutinen Singaporesta: Lääkeyhtiön pääjohtaja TUOMITTU RAIPPARANGAISTUKSEEN yrityksestä tehdä tyhjäksi historiallinen läpimurto lääketieteessä!
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 259: Lähetimme kuurimme dokumentaatioineen testattavaksi 7:ään tutkimuskeskukseen Aasiassa, Euroopassa ja Yhdysvalloissa. Tiedemaailma alkoi kohista meistä. Kuurimme tehokkuus vahvistettiin kiistattomasti.Vielä testien kestäessä 9000 ihmistä oli laihduttanut sillä tehokkaasti ja turvallisesti. Puhelimemme soivat jatkuvasti! Saimme onnitteluja maailmankuuluilta tutkijoilta. Olimme onnellisia. Siihen asti, kunnes…
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 335:
    So not at all like this.

    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 339: Angels are mentioned 273 times in the Bibble. Although we won't look at every instance, this study will offer a comprehensive look at what the Bibble says about these fascinating creatures.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 389: Kirjeet valaisevat meille "apostoli" Paavalin luonnetta paremmin kuin kenenkään antiikin henkilön Ciceroa ehkä lukuunottamatta. Apinoiden teot taas kuvailevat hänen lähetysmatkojaan. This kirja kertoo meille, missä paikoissa hän kävi ja mitä hän niissä teki. Ainoat apostolit, joilla näissä kertomuksissa on huomattava osa, ovat Pietari, alkuosan keskeisin hahmo, ja Paavali, joka on keskeisenä henkilönä yhdeksännestä luvusta kirjan loppuun. Kirjan aiheena on kristinuskon leviäminen Jerusalemista Roomaan apostolinkyydillä juutalaisten kiihkeäin vastarinnan ahdistaessa sitä joka taholta. Se, että roomalaiset virkamiehet on kuvattu myötämielisiksi kristinuskolle, tukee hyvin sitä teoriaa, että Luukasa kirjoitti kirjan Paavalin ollessa Roomassa odottamassa hovioikeuden päätöstä ja toivoi tällä sepustuxella voittavansa hänen puolelleen pääkaupungin vaikutusvaltaisen porukan myötätunnon.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 402: Vastoin Lucasin itsensä esittämää yleistä huhua/faniteoriaa/ kyseenalaista väitettä, historia viittaa vahvasti siihen, että Uusi testsmentti suunniteltiin alun perin yhdeksi elokuvaksi Paavalista, jossa oli ehkä vaihtoehto pienen budjetin jatko-osaksi (Ilmestyskirja). Huomaa, että Star Wars julkaistiin ennen kuin elokuvien odotettiin saavan jatko-osia, ja jatko-osat olivat harvinaisia. Voidaan väittää, että UT oli itse asiassa se, joka aloitti jatko-osien ja franchising-osien suosion, ellei sitten Star Trek.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 418: Toisaalta Helmut on tässä asiassa epäluotettava todistaja sillä hänen on syytetty sexuaalisesti harassoineen Elaine Bagelsia. Elaine Pagels (pronounced Paygulls) , née Hiesey (pronounced Haisi), February 13, 1943), is an American historian of religion. She is the Harrington Spear Paine Professor of Religion at Princeton University. After briefly studying dance at Martha Graham's studio, she began studying for a PhD in religion at Harvard University as a student of Helmut Koester.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 430: Sir William Mitchell Ramsay FBA (15. maaliskuuta 1851 – 20. huhtikuuta 1939) oli skotlantilainen arkeologi ja Uuden testamentin tutkija. Kuollessaan vuonna 1939 hänestä oli tullut aikansa tärkein auktoriteetti Vähä-Aasian historiassa ja johtava tutkija Uuden testamentin tutkimisessa.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 431: Tämä Ramsay sai koulutuksen Tübingenin ajatushautomossa (perustaja FC Baur ), joka epäili Uuden testamentin luotettavuutta, mutta hänen laajat arkeologiset ja historialliset tutkimuksensa vakuuttivat hänet sen historiallisesta oikeellisuudesta.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 433: Ramsay meni ensin Vähä-Aasiaan, missä monilla Apostolien teoissa mainituista kaupungeista ei ollut edes tarkkaa sijaintia. Rättipäät oli söhränneet lähes kaiken. Myöhemmin elämässään hän päätteli: '"Lisätutkimukset... osoittivat, että kirja kesti pienimmänkin tarkastelun Egeanmeren maailman tosiasioiden auktoriteettina ja että se oli kirjoitettu sellaisella harkintakyvyllä, taidolla, taidolla ja totuuden havainnoilla ollaxeen mallina historiallisesta lausunnosta" ( The Bearing of Recent Discovery, s. 85). Saman kirjan sivulla 89 Ramsay selitti: "Voit painaa Luukkaan sanoja enemmän kuin mikään muu historioitsija". Paavalin kirjeiden kirjoittajuudesta hän päätteli, että kaikki kolmetoista Uuden testamentin kirjettä, jotka Paavali näennäisesti kirjoitti, olivat aitoja, ja että koko raamattukin on sitä lyytä todennäköisesti kirjaimellisesti totta.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 435: Tästä hyvästä jouduttuaan Oxfordin klassisen taiteen ja arkkitehtuurin professorin viralta hänet nimitettiin ihmiskunnan Regius-professoriksi (latinalainen professuuri) Aberdeenissa, lyötiin köyhäxi ritariksi vuonna 1906 kunnianosoituksena stipendimaailmalle. Ramsay sai myös kolme kunniastipendiä Oxfordin korkeakouluista, yhdeksän kunniatohtorin arvoa brittiläisistä, mannermaisista ja pohjoisamerikkalaisista yliopistoista ja hänestä tuli lähes kaikkien arkeologiaa ja historiaa harjoittavien yhdistysten kunniajäsen. Hän oli yksi British Academyn alkuperäisistä jäsenistä ja hänelle myönnettiin paavi Leo XIII: n kultamitali vuonna 1893 ja Royal Geographical Societyn viktoriaaninen mitali vuonna 1906. Milli-Mollin setä antoi hänelle vielä viisipennisen ja täti namuja ja rusetin.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 438:

    Oikaisuja kirkkohistoriaan


    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 461: Klasu oli kotoisin Lyonista. Hän oli koominen. Historioitsija Suetoniuksen kirjoitusten mukaan Claudius puhui änkyttäen, käveli ontuvasti ja hänen polvensa ja päänsä tärisivät jatkuvasti. Kun Claudius nauroi tai raivostui, hän kuolasi ja hänen nenästään valui räkää. Antiikin maailmassa änkytyksen kaltaisia oireita pidettiin ilmiselvänä merkkinä vähäjärkisyydestä, joten Claudiuksen sukulaiset kuvittelivat hänen olevan henkisesti jälkeenjäänyt. Syy Claudiuksen oireisiin on epäselvä, mutta nykyhistorioitsijat ovat ehdottaneet muiden muassa poliota, CP-vammaisuutta tai Touretten syndroomaa. On kuitenkin epäilty, että Claudius olisi tarkoituksellisesti liioitellut oireitaan ja esiintynyt vajaaälyisenä harmittomana miehenä, jotta häntä ei olisi teloitettu, kuten keisarit Tiberius ja etenkin Clauden veljenpoika Caligula tekivät liian vallanhimoisina pidetyille sukulaisilleen.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 504: Kristitty historioitsija Sokrates Scholasticus oli sitä mieltä, että Julianus uskoi olevansa Aleksanteri Suuri "toisessa ruumiissa" sielujen vaelluksen kautta " Pythagoraan ja Platonin opetusten mukaisesti ".
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 534: Saladin oli siis syntyjään kurdi. Vuonna 1152 hän astui Syyrian hallitsijan Nur al-Dinin palvelukseen ja osoitti pian pätevyytensä taisteluissa ristiretkivaltioita vastaan. Hänen sedästään Shirkuhista tuli 1169 Egyptin visiiri, mutta setä kuoli kahden kuukauden kuluttua, ja Saladin otti hänen paikkansa. Saladin teki Egyptistä aijubidien vasallivaltion Egyptin fatimidihallitsijoiden valituksista huolimatta. Hän syrjäytti Egyptin kalifaatin 1171 ja otti sulttaanin arvonimen ja hassun hatun.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 564: John Whiting vietti monipuolista ja monipuolista työelämää Jerusalemissa. Hän työskenteli American Colony Photo Department -osastolla valokuvaajana ja auttoi myös yrityksen johtamisessa. Hän oli lankonsa Frederick Vesterin kanssa kumppani ja johtaja Vester & Co.-American Colony Storessa lähellä Jaffa Gatea. Siellä myytiin American Colony Photo Department -tulosteita, lyhtydioja ja postikorttikuvia muiden tavaroiden ohella. Hän oli mukana perustamassa lyhytaikaista New Yorkin haaraa American Colony Storessa, joka epäonnistui taloudellisen taantuman vuoksi. Whiting puhui sujuvasti arabiaa. Hän keräsi antiikkiesineitä, kuten keramiikkaa ja hahmoja, joita myytiin kaupassa, sekä palestiinalaisia ​​käsitöitä ja muita esineitä. Vuodesta 1908 vuoteen 1915 Whiting oli Yhdysvaltain apulaiskonsuli Jerusalemissa, on erikoistunut kauppaan ja maatalouteen. Ensimmäisen maailmansodan aikana hän toimitti apua haavoittuneille sotilaille vapaaehtoisena Turkin Punaisen Puolikuun ja American Colony Nurses -järjestön kanssa. Vuonna 1918 hän aloitti palveluksen Britannian armeijan tiedusteluupseerina. Whitingillä oli laaja tietämys Lähi-idän maisemista ja historiallisista kohteista. Hän opasti usein vierailijoita Palestiinan, Syyrian, Jordanian ja Libanonin matkoilla. Hän kirjoitti lukuisia artikkeleita. National Geographic Magazine on lähes tyyten kuvitettu American Colony Photo Departmentin ja sen seuraajan Matson Photo Servicen tuottamilla valokuvilla. (Katso Valittu bibliografia ).
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 617: Eli sellainen ol Viipuri, karjalaisten kaupunki, jossa Paavali syntyi ( Apt 22:3 ) ja jonka kansalainen hän oli ( Apt 9:11 ; Apt. 21:39 ). Sen muinaiset perinteet ja sen keskisuuruus selittää ja oikeuttaa ylpeyden, jolla hän väitti olevansa "ei aivan turhan kaupungin kansalainen" (Apostolien teot 21:39). On todennäköistä, että hänen esi-isänsä olivat olleet Antiokhos Epiphanesin Tarsokseen asettamien juutalaisten joukossa, joista tuli kansalaisuudestaan tai uskonnosta tinkimättä kreikkalaisen mallin mukaan järjestetyn yhteisön kansalaisia. Mihin tilaisuuteen ja mihin palvelukseen Rooman civitas oli annettu yhdelle Paavalin esivanhemmista, emme voi sanoa; meille kerrotaan, että hänen isällänsä oli ennen hänen syntymäänsä ollut tuo haluttu etuoikeus ( Apostolien teot 22:28). On kiehtova, mutta vaikeasti mahdoton pyrkimys jäljittää Paavalin elämästä ja kirjoituksista hänen hyvinkääläiset sukujuurensa. On totta, kuten Hieronymus väittää, että monet paavalilaiset sanat ja ilmaukset olivat tyypillisesti tarsolaisia, joista hyvän kuvan antoi Dion Kuiltasuu (alla), mutta siinä se sitten onkin. Tämä ei ole oikea paikka keskustella yksityiskohtaisesti Tarsuksen myöhemmästä historiasta, jonka monet kohdat ovat hämäriä ja vaikeita. Lähteenä tähänkin lurituxeen oli se tuntemattomampi Sir William Ramsay, Milli -Molli dopppelgängeri.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 632: Bibliografia: Bost-Pouderon, C. 2000. "Le ronflement des Tarsiens: l'interprétation du Discours XXXIII de Dion de Pruse." REG 113: 636-51.—. 2003. "Dion de Pruse et la physiognomonie dans le Discours XXXIII." REA 105.1: 157-74.—. 2006. Dion Chrysostome: Trois discours aux villes (Or. 33-35). 2 osaa Salerno: Helios.—. 2009. "Entre predication morale, parénèse et politique: les Discours 31-34 de Dion Chrysostome (ou: la subversion des genres)." Julkaisussa Danielle van Mal-Maeder et ai., toim. Jeux de voix: enonciation, intertextualité et intencionalité dans la littérature antiikki. Bern: Peter Lang. 225-56.Desideri, P. 1978. Dione di Prusa: un intellettuale greco nell'impero romano. Messina: d'Anna. Gleason, Maud. 1995. Making Men: Sophistis and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Gangloff, Anne. 2006. Dion Chrysostome et les mythes: Hellénisme, communication et philosophie politique. Grenoble: Millon. Houser, J. Samuel. 1998. "Eros" ja "Aphrodisia" Dio Chrysostomin teoksissa. Classical Antiquity 17.2: 235-58. Jones, CP 1978. Dio Chrysostomosin roomalainen maailma. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Millar, F. 1968. "Local Cultures in the Room Empire: Libyan, Punic and Latin in Roman Africa." JRS 58: 126-34.Mras, K. 1949. "Die προλαλία bei den griechischen Schriftstellern." Wiener Studien 64: 71-81. Swain, Simon. 1996. Hellenismi ja valtakunta: kieli, klassismi ja valta kreikkalaisessa maailmassa, 50-250 jKr. Oxford: Oxford University Press.—. 2007. "Polemonin fysiognomia". Julkaisussa Simon Swain, toim. Kasvojen näkeminen, sielun näkeminen: Polemonin fysiognomia klassisesta antiikista keskiaikaiseen islamiin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 125-202. Harvard University Press. Millar, F. 1968. "Paikalliset kulttuurit Rooman valtakunnassa: Libyan, Punic ja Latin in Roman Africa." JRS 58: 126-34.Mras, K. 1949.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 645: Antiokheia, lat. Antiocheia/Antiochia ad Orontem) oli Seleukos I:n perustama antiikin ja bysantin aikainen kaupunki historiallisessa Syyriassa nykyisen Turkin alueella. Iskenderunin lahden eteläpuolella vinosti vastapäätä Tarsosta. Nykyään Antakya on noin 213 000 asukkaan kaupunki Turkissa Orontes-joen varrella, n. 40 km Välimerestä. Kaupunki sijaitsee Hatayn umpisuolen näköisessä maakunnassa, jonka Turkki liitti itseensä Syyrialta vuonna 1938 Mortonin lukiessa Patun renkaanjälkiä.
    xxx/ellauri287.html on line 671: Sasanian vallan aikaa pidetään Iranin historian kohokohtana, ja se oli monella tapaa muinaisen iranilaisen kulttuurin huippu ennen muslimien valloitusta ja sen jälkeistä islamisaatiota. Sasanilaiset suvaitsivat alamaistensa erilaisia ​​uskontoja ja kulttuureja; kehitti monimutkaisen, keskitetyn valtion byrokratian; elvytti zoroastrianismin heidän hallintonsa laillistavana ja yhdistävänä voimana; rakennutti suuria monumentteja ja julkisia töitä; ja holhosi kulttuuri- ja oppilaitoksia. Imperiumin kulttuurinen vaikutus ulottui paljon sen aluerajojen ulkopuolelle - mukaan lukien Länsi -Eurooppa, Afrikka, Kiina ja Intia - ja auttoi muokkaamaan eurooppalaista ja aasialaista keskiaikaista taidetta. Persialaisesta kulttuurista tuli perusta islamilaiselle kulttuurille , ja se vaikutti taiteeseen, arkkitehtuuriin, musiikkiin, kirjallisuuteen ja filosofiaan kaikkialla muslimimaailmassa. Kitos sassanidit!
    xxx/ellauri289.html on line 92: Jehovan todistajat aloittivat toimintansa vuonna 1870, kun Charles Taze Russell johti raamatuntutkisteluja Pittsburghissa Pennsylvaniassa. Jehovan todistajien liike syntyi raamatunopiskelijaliikkeestä, jonka myös perusti Russell. Kun hän alkoi kiistää joitain perinteisiä kristillisiä näkemyksiä, syntyivät Jehovan todistajat. 2½ vuoden tauon jälkeen Volusia Jehovan todistajat palaavat koputtamaan oviin.
    xxx/ellauri289.html on line 161: Jehovan todistajat pitävät Raamattua tieteellisesti ja historiallisesti täsmällisenä ja luotettavana ja tulkitsevat suuren osan siitä kirjaimellisesti, mutta hyväksyvät sen osia tarvittaessa symbolisiksi. Vartiotorni-seuran julkaisujen kautta annetuilla hallintoelimen lausunnoilla on melkein yhtä suuri merkitys kuin Raamatulla.
    xxx/ellauri289.html on line 181: He pitävät kaikkia muita nykyajan uskontoja väärinä ja samastavat ne Ilmestyskirjan 17. luvun "porttoon", ja uskovat, että saatanan Yhdistyneet Kansakunnat tuhoaa ne pian, jonka he uskovat edustavan pyhissä kirjoituksissa Ilmestyskirjan luvun 17 helakanpunaista petoa.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 98: Äärimmäinen esimerkki on vulkanisoituneina tunnetut vieraslajit (mongoloidirodut), joilla oli väkivaltainen menneisyys, mutta jotka oppivat hallitsemaan kiivaita tunteitaan. Roddenberry antoi Star Trekille myös sodanvastaisen viestin ja kuvasi Yhdistyneen Neuvostoplaneettojen liiton ihanteellisena, optimistisena versiona Neuvostoliitosta. Verkosto vastusti hänen pyrkimyksiään, koska he olivat huolissaan vapaasta markkinoitavuudesta. He vastustivat esimerkiksi Roddenberryn vaatimusta, jonka mukaan Enterprisella on rodullisesti monimuotoinen miehistö (eli Tri Spock).
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 121: Syyskuussa 1989 Floridan Tallahasseessa perheen yhdistämisessä tapahtuneen aivohalvauksen jälkeen Roddenberryn terveys heikkeni entisestään, mikä johti lopulta hänen käyttämään pyörätuolia. Hänen oikea kätensä halvaantui toisen aivohalvauksen jälkeen lokakuun alussa 1991, mikä aiheutti hänelle jatkuvaa kipua, kun lihakset alkoivat surkastua. Rullatuoli ei pysynyt enää suunnassa. Se aiheutti myös ongelmia hänen oikean silmänsä näkössä, ja hän koki kommunikoinnin kokonaisilla lauseilla vaikeaksi. Klo 14.00, 24. lokakuuta, hän osallistui tapaamiseen lääkärinsä, tohtori Ronald Richin, kanssa Santa Monicassa, Kaliforniassa. Hän saapui rakennukseen henkilökuntansa kanssa ja alkoi matkustaa hissillä yhdeksänteen kerrokseen. Kun he saavuttivat viidenteen kerrokseen, hän alkoi saada vaikeuksia hengittää ja hänet ajettiin lääkärin vastaanotolle, jossa hänet asetettiin makuuasentoon ja sairaanhoitajalle annettiin happea. Barrett lähetettiin hakemaan. Saapuessaan hiän piti Roddenberryn nahatonta päätä sylissä ja rohkaisi tätä hengittämään. Hän sai sydänpysähdyksen ja kuoli lääkärin vastaanotolla pian sen jälkeen. Elvytystä yritettiin tuloksetta, ja ensihoitajat saapuivat viemään hänet tien toiselle puolelle Santa Monican lääketieteelliseen keskukseen, jossa hänet juhlallisesti julistettiin kuolleeksi. Hän oli 70-vuotias. Lagosin pakarapäät elivät paljon vanhemmixi vaikkakin vain maanalaisessa kopissa.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 125: Roddenberry kuoli 24. lokakuuta 1991, jolloin vastaava tuottaja Rick Berman sai franchisingin hallinnan. Star Trek oli tullut tunnetuksi Ensiarvoisen tärkeän sisällä "hampurilaisketjuna" sen suuren menestyksen ja toistuvan roolin vuoksi studion telttapylväänä muiden projektien epäonnistuessa.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 134: Enterprisen (suom. liikeyritys) neitsytlento sijoittuu Linnunkakan galaksiin, noin vuosille 2266–2269. Alusta ja miehistöä johtavat kapteeni James T. Kirk ( William Shatner ), ensimmäinen upseeri ja tiedemies Spock ( Leonard Nimoy ) ja ylilääkäri Leonard H. "Bones" McCoy ( DeForest Kelley ) ja naisistona 1 liian vanha ämmyrkäinen josta tuli Roddenberryn kakkosvaimo, söpö kiimainen joumän plus 1 Viina niminen vierailevana tissi- ja pyllyvakona. Shatnerin puhe-esittely jokaisen jakson avaustekstien aikana ilmaisi tähtialuksen tarkoituksen:
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 139: Toinen luotsi esitteli suurimman osan muista päähenkilöistä: kapteeni Kirk ( William Shatner ), konepäällikkö luutnantti "Beam me up" Scott ( James Doohan ) ja luutnantti Zulu ( George Takei ), joka palveli fyysikkona laivalla toisessa luotsissa, mutta myöhemmin hänestä tuli ruorimies koko sarjan ajan. Paul Fix näytteli tohtori Mark Piperiä toisessa pilotissa; laivan lääkäri Leonard McCoy ( DeForest Kelley) liittyi näyttelijöihin, kun kuvaukset alkoivat ensimmäisen kauden aikana, ja hän pysyi sarjan loppuosan ajan, jolloin hänestä tuli sarjan kolmas tähti. Aluksen vakituiseen miehistöön liittyi ensimmäisen kauden aikana myös viestintäupseeri, luutnantti Nyota Uhura ( Nichelle Nichols ), ensimmäinen afroamerikkalainen nainen, jollaisilla oli niin tärkeä sivuvaunun rooli amerikkalaisissa televisiosarjoissa; kapteenin päämies Janice Rand ( Grace Lee Whitney ), joka lähti ensimmäisen kauden puolivälissä; ja Christine Chapel (Majel Barrett), aluksen sairaanhoitaja (ja Rotvallin kainaloinen kananen) sekä McCoyn avustaja. Walter Koenig liittyi näyttelijöihin neuvostolippuna Pavel Chekovina sarjan toisella kaudella. Nimoy oli sarjan ukrainalaisvahvistus.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 145: Taiteilija ja kuvanveistäjä Wah Chang, joka oli työskennellyt Walt Disney Productionsissa, palkattiin suunnittelemaan ja valmistamaan rekvisiitta: hän loi avattavan kommunikaattorin, jonka uskotaan usein vaikuttaneen Nokian matkapuhelimen kannettavan version kokoonpanoon. Chang suunnitteli myös kannettavan anturi-tallennus-laskennan "tricorder"-laitteen ja erilaisia kuvitteellisia laitteita tähtialuksen insinöörimiehistölle ja sen sairaanhoitoasemalle. Sarjan edetessä hän auttoi luomaan erilaisia mieleenpainuvia avaruusolentoja, kuten Gornin ja Hortan. Eli kyllä viirusilmiäkin tarvittiin.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 169: 2018, kun Kurtzmanista tuli Discoveryn ainoa showrunner, hän allekirjoitti viisivuotisen kokonaissopimuksen CBS Television Studiosin kanssa laajentaakseen Star Trek -franchisea Discoveryn lisäksi useisiin uusiin sarjoihin, minisarjoihin ja animaatiosarjoihin. Kurtzman halusi "avaa tämän maailman" ja luoda useita sarjoja, jotka sijoittuvat samaan maailmankaikkeuteen, mutta omalla "ainutlaatuisella tarinankerronnallaan ja erillisellä elokuvallisella fiiliksellä". Keskusteltuaan franchising-sopimuksen seuraavasta vaiheesta Kurtzman sanoi, että useita projekteja oli kehitteillä. Lokakuussa 2020 Kurtzman totesi, että Star Trek -sarjoja on suunniteltu vuoteen 2300 asti.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 196: Alkuhaastatteluissa eräs vanhemmista renkaissa roikkuneista miehistä verkkaisesti selitti: tää homma menee siis normaalisti niin, että...
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 452: Yhdessä ilmeisessä mielessä Putin ja Kreml jakavat natsi-Saksan uskon: jos valhetta toistetaan riittävän usein, se koetaan lopulta totuudeksi tai ainakin jollain tasolla relevantiksi. Hallitustekniikkaa, jota kutsutaan "suureksi valheeksi", käsiteltiin jo teoksessa Mein Kampf (1925). Hitler tajusi, että jättimäinen, karkea valhe – Die große Lüge – toimii paremmin kuin pieni valhe. Järkyttävät valheet – vaikka ne kiistävätkin vuoret tosiasioita – jättävät usein epäilyksen jälkeä. Pikkuhiljaa yhteiskunnallinen luottamus repeytyy ja vetää maton alta jaetun kuvan saamiseksi todellisuudesta. Tätä propagandatekniikkaa kehitti edelleen Joseph Goebbels muun muassa alitajuisesti itsensä paljastavassa näyttelyssä Aus Churchills Lügenfabrik (1941): on välttämätöntä valehdella suurella tavalla ja levittää sitä kunnolla, toistaa ilmeisiä vääriä virheitä huolimatta vaarasta, että vaikutat naurettavalta ja irtaantuneelta todellisuudesta. Riittää, jos tavoitat pienen määrän vastaanottavaisia ​​kuuntelijoita, jotka etsivät syntipukkeja. Rabulistit [vähän niinkuin populistit, mutta pahempaa, niinkuin kakka ja paska] vetoavat yhteiskunnan onnettomiin lapsiin, vähäosaisiin, laahuxeen, antavat syrjäytyneille mahdollisuuden tukahdutettuun revansismiin. Sellainen peli nyt ei kerta kaikkiaan vetele! Pitäkää mölyt mahassa ja jatkakaa vessan pesua! Tässä Trump vie tulisoihtua eteenpäin historiallisessa jatkumossa suurella valheellaan ilmeisestä vaalitappiosta vuonna 2020.
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 467: Tämä eroaa länsimaisista pettämistä koskevista opeista ja informaatiosodan doktriineista siinä, että se korostaa pragmaattisia näkökohtia, kun länsimaiset korostavat semanttisia. The Moscow Timesin artikkelissa selitettiin: "Mаскировкаlla on kuitenkin laajempi sotilaallinen merkitys: strateginen, operatiivinen, fyysinen ja taktinen petos. Ilmeisesti Yhdysvaltain armeijan terminologiassa tätä kutsutaan joko CC&D:ksi (naamiointi, salailu ja petos) tai viime aikoina D&D (kielto ja huijaus). Se on koko shebang [räjähdys] – hiihtomaskeissa tai univormuissa olevista miehistä, joilla ei ole merkkiä, salaisiin toimiin, piilotettuihin aseiden siirtoihin ja – no, sisällissodan aloittamiseen, mutta teeskentelyyn, ettet ole tehnyt mitään sellaista."
    xxx/ellauri291.html on line 533: – Asunnolle saavuttuamme suutuin Jarnolle melko heti sisälle tullessamme, jolloin hän putosi vaunuista. Tämän jälkeen tapahtumat kehittyivät siihen, että löin hänen päätään lattiaan ja mahdollisesti myös asunnon seinään. Jarno jäi makaamaan pitkäksi aikaa vähissä vaatteissa melkein klo 16 asti, jolloin ikään kuin havahduin, mitä olin tehnyt ja soitin terveyskeskukseen, hoitaja kertoi.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 43: Some biblical scholars maintain that the woman in Jericho who hid Joshua’s two spies was a harlot or a prostitute. But if that was the case, how did this woman, Rahab, become one of the ancestors of Jesus Christ? Wouldn’t THE Father ensure a pure lineage for His Son? Wouldn't any father?
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 45: In this historical fiction, author Diana Wallis Taylor offers a beautiful story of intrigue that explains how Rahab came to be the mother of Boaz, grandmother of Obese, and great-grandmother of Jesse, the father of King David, without peddling her arse for denars.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 49: Rahab marries Radames, a young Egyptian officer, who is to become the new governor of Jericho. They live in the Egyptian embassy set in the city wall. When the Israelites approach Canaan with their army, pharaoh sends word that he is withdrawing his troops. Radames fabricates a story to tell Jericho’s king, but the babylonian lawmaker Hammurabi doesn’t believe it…and he has his eye on the beautiful Rahab.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 87: Areenalla Tekla sidottiin kiinni raivokkaaseen naarasleijonaan, joka kuitenkin vain nuoli hänen jalkojaan kuin jäzkitöttöröä. Kansa alkoi vähän pitää Teklan tuomitsemista vääryytenä. Seuraavana päivänä Teklan kimppuun laskettiin joukko muita pedoja, mutta hän oli yhä naarasleijonan suojeluksessa ja pedot alkoivat nahistella keskenään. Kun Tekla näki vedellä täytetyn syvän kaivannon, jossa oli meripedoja odottamassa seuraavaa vuoroa, hänet valtasi halu saada kaste vielä ennen kuolemaansa. Hän huudahti: ”Nyt on aika ottaa uudestisyntymisen peso!” ja heittäytyi veteen lausuen: ”Jeesuksen Kristuksen nimessä minä kastan itseni näin selfienä viimeisenä päivänäni.” Väkijoukkoa puistatti pelkkä ajatus siitä, että kaunotar joutuisi pedojen raatelemaksi, mutta samalla hetkellä kun Tekla sukelsi veteen, salama iski pedoihin, jotka nousivat kuolleina pintaan, ja tulinen pilvi peitti Kristuksen morsiamen niin ettei kukaan nähnyt sen pehkoa.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 111: Saint Tekla was an Ethiopian saint and monk mostly venerated as a hermit. He was the Abuna of Ethiopia who founded a major monastery in his native province of Shewa. He is significant for being the only Ethiopian saint popular both amongst Ethiopians and outside that country. Tekle Haymanot "is the only Ethiopian saint celebrated officially in foreign churches such as Rome and Egypt." His feast day is 30 August (Nehasə 24 in Ethiopian calendar), and the 24th day of every month in the Ethiopian calendar is dedicated to Tekle Haymanot.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 113: Tekle Haymanot is frequently represented as an old man with wings on his back and only one leg visible. There are a number of explanations for this popular image. C.F. Beckingham and G.W.B. Huntingford recount one story, that the saint "having stood too long for about 34 years, one of his legs broke or cut while Satan was attempting to stop his prayers, whereupon he stood on one foot for 7 years." Paul B. Henze describes his missing leg as appearing as a "severed leg... in the lower left corner discreetly wrapped in a cloth." The traveller Thomas Pakenham learned from the Prior of Debre Damo how Tekle Haymanot received his wings:
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 115: One day he said he would go to Jerusalem to see the Garden of Gethsemane and the hill of the skull that is called Golgotha. But Shaitan (Satan) planned to stop Tekla Haymanot going on his journey to the Holy Land, and he cut the rope which led from the rock to the ground just as Tekla Haymanot started to climb down. Then God gave Tekla Haymanot six wings and he flew down to the valley below... and from that day onwards Teklahaimanot would fly back and forth to Jerusalem above the clouds like an aeroplane. No, more like a bird. Like Super Tekla.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 135: Super Tekla also denied that he was neglectful of his and Michelle’s baby boy, named Angelo, who was born with an anorectal malformation.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 136: According to the comedian, Angelo had a successful operation thanks to the help of his fellow actors in the industry.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 173: Paavalin ja Teklan teot ( Acta Pauli et Theclae ) on apokryfinen tarina – Edgar J. Goodspeed kutsui sitä " uskonnolliseksi romanssiksi " – apostoli Paavalin vaikutuksesta nuoreen neitsyeen nimeltä Tekla. Se on yksi Uuden testamentin apokryfien kirjoituksista. Tertullianus, De baptismo 17:5 (n. 190) sanoo, että Aasiasta kotoisin oleva presbyteeri kirjoitti Paavalin ja Theklan historian, ja hänet nyrjäytettiin sen jälkeen, kun hän tunnusti kirjoittaneensa sen. Eugenia Roomalainen Commoduksen hallituskaudella (180–192) raportoi marttyyrikuolemansa teoissa olleen Theklan mallina tekstin lukemisen jälkeen, ennen kuin Tertullianus paheksui sitä. Hieronymus kertaa Tertullianuksen tiedot, ja hänen tarkkuutensa vuoksi kronologian raportoinnissa jotkut tutkijat pitävät tekstiä 1. vuosisadan luomuksena.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 246: Helmikuussa 1810 Stanhope lähti Portsmouthista veljensä James Hamilton Stanhopen kanssa, joka seurasi häntä Rodokselle asti. Hänen lähipiirinsä joukossa olivat hänen lääkärinsä ja myöhempi elämäkerran kirjoittaja Charles Lewis Meryon ja hänen piikansa Elizabeth Williams ja Ann Fry. Rodoksella hän tapasi Michael Brucen, seikkailijan ja myöhemmin kansanedustajan, josta tuli hänen rakastajansa ja matkakumppaninsa. Väitetään, että kun seurue saapui Ateenaan, runoilija Lord Byron, Brucen yliopistoystävä, sukelsi mereen tervehtimään heitä. Myöhemmin Byron kuvaili Stanhopea "se vaarallisin asia, naispuolinen älypää" ja huomautti, että hänellä oli "suuri välinpitämättömyys keskustelussaan ja käytöksessään vastaanotetuista käsitteistä". Myöhemmin hän väitti, että hän päätti olla osallistumatta naisten oikeuksia koskevaan keskusteluun Stanhopen (hirvittävä keskustelija) kanssa, koska "haluan seksiä liian paljon riitautuakseni heidän kanssaan." Sama juttu muuten uroskoirilla. Ateenasta Stanhopen seurue matkusti edelleen Konstantinopoliin (nykyinen Istanbul), Ottomaanien valtakunnan pääkaupunkiin. He aikoivat edetä Kairoon, joka vasta äskettäin selvisi kaaoksesta, joka seurasi Napoleonin hyökkäystä Egyptiin ja sitä seuranneita kansainvälisiä konflikteja.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 254: [Lady Stanhope] ja Meryon analysoivat oikein Ashkelonin rakenteen historiaa ennen kuin nykyaikaisten arkeologisten analyysien menetelmät tunnettiin tai käytettiin. [Meryon] kertoi oikeutetusti ensimmäiseksi arkeologisen paikan ensimmäiseksi stratigrafiseksi analyysiksi, että "oli täysi syy uskoa, että Ascalonin kokemissa mestarinvaihdoksissa paikka, jossa nyt kaivamme, oli alun perin ollut pakanatemppeli, sen jälkeen kirkko ja sitten moskeija." On muistettava, että samaan aikaan Kreikassa stratigrafiasta autuaasti tietämättömät kaivinkoneet kerskuivat vain löytöjensä määrästä ja taiteellisesta laadusta.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 260: Stanhope ei kaivanut raunioita Ashkelonissa oman henkilökohtaisen ahneutensa ja hyödynsä vuoksi. Hän näytti tekevän niin kohottaakseen maailman aluetta, jota hän oli tullut kutsumaan kotiin, aikoen palauttaa kullan ottomaanien sulttaanille. Patsaan tuhoaminen tehtiin myös todistaakseen hänen omistautumisensa ja kumotakseen ajatuksen, että hän vain yritti ryöstää Palestiinaa Britannialle. Samoin hänen kaivaukset olivat melko metodisia, hyvin tallennettuja ajalle, ja patsas dokumentoitiin ennen sen tuhoamista. Kaikki nämä asiat olivat epätavallisia tekniikoita ajalle, ja tekevät siten Stanhopen kaivauksesta ainutlaatuisen ja arvokkaan historialle. Olen täysin samaa mieltä Silbermanin johtopäätöksen kanssa, että Stanhopen kaivausta "voidaan oikeutetusti kutsua ensimmäiseksi nykyaikaiseksi kaivaukseksi Pyhän maan arkeologisen tutkimuksen historiassa". Hänen tutkimusmatkansa tasoitti tietä tuleville kaivauksille ja matkailulle paikalle. Tosi hienoa.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 285: Midrashissa Rahab on Saaran, Abigailin ja Esterin ohella yksi neljästä kauneimmasta naisesta, jotka maailma on koskaan tuntenut. Babylonian Talmudissa Rahab oli niin kaunis, että jo hänen nimensä mainitseminen saattoi ottaa ankarasti eteen (Megilla 15a). Rahabin sanotaan kääntyneen 50-vuotiaana harjoitettuaan prostituutiota 40 vuotta ja katuneen kolmea syntiä sanoen:
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 291: Rabbit pitivät Rahabia kelvollisena päin- ja selinmakuulle kääntyneenä ja todistivat, että Rahab meni naimisiin Joosuan kanssa tämän kääntymyksen jälkeen; heidän jälkeläisiinsä kuuluivat profeetat Jeremia, Hilkia, Seraja, Mahseia, Baruk, Hesekiel ja profeetta Hulda, vaikka Joosuan kirjassa ei ole kertomusta esinahkajohtajan avioliitosta kenenkään kanssa tai perhe-elämästä. Rahab mainitaan usein Jetron (Yitro) ja Na´amanin rinnalla "positiivisina esimerkkeinä" Israeliin liittyneistä käännynnäisistä, ja toisessa midrashissa Rahab toimii kaikkien maailman pakanakansojen puolestapuhujana. Pakanoissa on monta tosi mehukasta panoa.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 337: Hulda esiintyy heprealaisessa Raamatussa vain yhdeksässä jakeessa, 2. Kun. 22:13–20 , 2. Aikakirja 34:22–28.. Tämä lyhyt kertomus riittää tekemään selväksi, että Huldaa pidettiin profeettana, joka oli tottunut puhumaan Jumalan sanaa lyhyesti suoraan ylipapeille ja kuninkaallisille virkamiehille, joille korkeat virkamiehet tulivat anomaan, jotka kertoivat kuninkaille ja kansoille heidän kohtalostaan, joilla oli valta määrittää, mikä oli ja mikä ei ollut aito laki, ja kuka puhui ankaralla käskyllä ​​toimiessaan profeettana. Siitä huolimatta Raamattu ei tarjoa Huldasta sellaista nippelitietoa kuin se tyypillisesti tarjoaa meille miehisille profeetoille. Me todellakin jäämme tietämään enemmän hänen miehensä taustasta kuin tiedämme hänen omastaan, ja hänen persoonallisuudestaan ​​tiedämme suurelta osin hänen aviomieheltään. Miehen mukaan Hulda oli varsinainen pirttihirmu, pahempi kuin Pekka Puupään Justiina.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 473: Mutta hieman pidemmällä samassa historiassa hän edustaa Apolloniosta käyttäen hänen jumalallisen luonteensa osoituksena nämä sanat Damisille itselleen: "Minä itse, kumppanini, ymmärrän kaikkia kieliä, vaikka en ole oppinut yhtään." Ja taas hän sanoo hänelle: "Älä ihmettele, sillä minä tiedän, mitä jouzenet ajattelevat, vaikka he ovat hiljaa."
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 490: Siten saamme tietää, että Apollonius kysyi, oliko heillä kultaista vettä [teetä]. Mikä fiksu ja ihmeellinen kysymys! Ja hän kysyi myös miehistä, jotka asuvat maan alla, ja muista, joita kutsutaan possuiksi ja varjojalkaiksi miehiksi, ja hän kysyi, oliko heidän joukossaan martichora-niminen nelijalkainen eläin, jolla on pää kuin miehellä, mutta joka kilpailee kooltaan leijonan kanssa, kun taas sen pyrstöstä tulee kyynärän pituisia karvoja kuin piikkejä, mitä se on tottunut ampua kuin nuolet niitä metsästäjiä kohti. [Piikkisika]
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 505: Oliko silloin niin, että tämä tulevaisuuden tietämyksen saanut mies ei tiennyt, mikä Eufratin luonne oli, eikä mitä se kohta tempasee. Sillä se ei ole nyt ensimmäinen kerta, mutta tässä Vespasianuksen tapauksessa hän on taipuvainen syyttämään häntä pahimmasta hahmosta. Kuinka hän sitten suositteli sellaista henkilöä hallitsijalle niin lämpimästi, että tämä hänen suosituksensa seurauksena avasi palatsinsa ovet hänelle? Miksi, eikö sokealle ole selvää, kuten sanotaan, että tässä ennaltatietämisessä hänen oma historioitsijansa jättää kaverin kuin YK-sotilas bemarin. Vaikka toisaalta häntä voitaisiin pitää reiluna miehenä, jos voisimme olettaa, että alun perin ja ennen kuin hän oppi kantapään kautta, hän halusi päästää kaverinsa palatsiin yhtä vapaasti, Eufrat mukaan lukien, kuin itsekin, mutta jälkeenpäin heidän kiistansa sai hänet käyttämään sellaista kieltä hänestä.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 507: En halua näin väittää syyttääkseni Apolloniosta siitä, että tämä syytti valheellisesti Eufratia, joka oli aikansa miehistä arvostetuin filosofi, niin paljon, että hänen ylistyksensä ovat yhä filosofian opiskelijoiden huulilla. Ei, mutta se, joka niin haluaisi (en toki minä), voisi ottaa tämän kämmenmielisenä esimerkkinä panettelusta ja selkäpuremisesta ja käyttää sitä Apolloniosta vastaan. Sillä jos Eufrat todella on heidän tunnustuksensa perusteella kaiken filosofian johtaja, voimme syyttää hänen kilpailijaansa sensuurista, kun tämä hyökkää häntä vastaan hänen hirviömäisen käytöksensä vuoksi; ja olettaa, että jälkimmäinen sai huonon maineensa, koska hän näin ollen hyökkäsi hänen kimppuunsa, koska hän tavoitteli - tämä oli syytös - käytöstä, joka ei ollut kovin tyydyttävää filosofille. (Leukavasti argumentoitu vaikka ize sanonkin, eix je?)
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 515: kerroksesta maahan; ja hänet nostettiin ylös kuolleena. Mutta Paavali meni alas, heittäytyi hänen ylitsensä, kiersi kätensä hänen ympärilleen ja sanoi: "Älkää hätäilkö, sillä hänessä pihisee vielä henki". First thing make sure he's really dead. Blam!
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 546:

    Ateenan historia


    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 551: Roomalaisen historioitsija Justinuksen mukaan kun Cynaegyrus menetti oikean kätensä, hän tarttui vihollisen alukseen vasemmalla, mutta persialaiset katkaisivat tämänkin käden. Menetettyään molemmat kätensä hän roikkui hampaistaan laivan kokassa "kuin raivoisa peto".
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 569: Kreikan vapaussodan ja Kreikan kuningaskunnan perustamisen jälkeen Ateena valittiin vastikään itsenäistyneen Kreikan valtion pääkaupungiksi vuonna 1834, suurelta osin historiallisista ja tunneperäisistä syistä. Se oli täysin tuppukylä.
    xxx/ellauri292.html on line 609: Tämän Mysteerien osan jälkeen oli koko yön pituinen juhla ( Pannychis ), jota seurasi tanssia ja iloa. Tämä osa juhlista oli ilmainen ja avoin yleisölle.
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 89: Paavali kuvailee Juniaa siinä varhaiskristillisen yhteisön jäseneksi ennen häntä ja yhdeksi maanmiehistään (sori, maahenkilöistä).
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 94: Junian sukupuolesta ja apostolisesta asemasta on ollut kiistaa, vaikka hän onkin ollut pidetty naisena suurimman osan kristillisestä historiasta sekä suurin osa tutkijoista yhtyisi häneen kuvan perusteella mielellään. Varhaiskristilliset urheilukommentaattorit eivät antaneet epäilystäkään siitä, että Paavali viittasi Juniaan eikä suinkaan kintaalla, ja että hiän oli nainen ja apostoli, mukaan lukien Hieronymus (4.-5. vuosisata), Höttö Vermicelli (10. vuosisata). Prophylakti ja Peter Abelard (molemmat 1000-luku, perehtyneitä naistenmiehiä).
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 203: Voimme tunnistaa typologian käytön Patun nähdessä uppokasteen ennakoituna Israelin Punaisen meren ylityxessä. (1. Kor. 10:1-6) Jo muinaisina aikoina tapahtui jonkin verran luisumista typologiasta allegoriaan, ja allegoria löysi tiensä homilioihin ja hartausopetukseen. Mutta katekettisissa opetuksissa, dogmeissa, uskontunnustuksissa ja isien kirjoituksissa säilytettiin selkeämpi typologia. Asia on siinä, että sellaisilla typologioilla on ikivanha, kunniakas ja oikeutettu paikka kristillisessä historiassa ja teologiassa. Lisää esimerkkejä:
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 214: Koittakaapa ympärileikata itsenne kerralla ja ottakaa pois sydämeltänne esinahat, te Juudan miehet ja Jerusalemin asukkaat, ettei minun vihani tulisi esiin niinkuin tuli ja sytytyspala, jota kukaan ei voi sammuttaa, teidän pahuudenne tähden, puuhiset. (Jeremia 4:4)
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 230: Erityisesti kiellettyjä eläimiä tai lintuja (kuten The New English Bible on käännetty) olivat kameli, kivikani tai mäyrä, jänis, sika; griffon-korppikotka, musta korppikotka, parrakaskorppikotka; leija ja kaikenlainen haukka; kaikenlainen varis ja korppi, aavikkopöllö, lyhytkorvapöllö, pitkäkorvapöllö, kaikenlainen haukka; keltapöllö, kalapöllö, screech-pöllö; pikkupöllö, sarvipöllö, kalasääski, haikara tai haikara, kaikenlaiset merimetsot, hoopoe ja lepakko; kaikki nelijalkaiset villieläimet, jotka kulkevat litteillä tassuilla; myyrärotta (lumikko), jerboa, kaikenlainen piikkihäntälisko, gekko, hiekkagekko, seinägekko, suuri lisko ja kameleontti; kaikki maassa kuhisevat olennot mitkä ryömivät vatsallaan,
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 232: Jokainen kuhiseva siivekäs olento, jolla oli nelijalkainen, kiellettiin tuholaisina, mutta silti oli sallittua syödä heinäsirkkaa, pitkäpäistä heinäsirkkaa, vihreää heinäsirkkaa ja aavikon heinäsirkkaa! Mutta älä haukkaa minkäänlaista haukkaa! Ja päästä leija lentämään!
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 279: Kristus itse sanoi Nikodeemukselle: "Ja niin kuin Mooses kohotti vällykäärmeen erämaassa, niin myös Ihmisen Poika on kohotettava puutuella." (Jeesus on uuden testamentin vastine nimelle Joshua tai Jeshua, joka tarkoittaa, että Jehova on pelastusmiehistö.)
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 347: He puhuvat mielellään pahaa, eivätkä tunne häntä, joka on heidät luonut; he ovat lasten murhaajia, Jumalan luotujen turmelijoita, kondomien käyttäjiä; he kääntyvät pois köyhistä ja sortavat kärsiviä; he ovat rikkaiden puolestapuhujia, mutta köyhien epäoikeudenmukaisia tuomareita; he ovat siis täysin syntisiä.
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 628: Konstantinopoli oli itäisen ortodoksisen kirkon kulttuurinen ja historiallinen koti, ja kun kirkon merkitys yhtenä rappeutuvan tsaarivaltion pilareista kasvoi, kasvoi myös Venäjän pyrkimys saada Konstantinopoli hallintaansa. Strategisesti taattu vapaus kulkea salmen läpi -vapaus, jonka vain Venäjän ylivalta olisi turvannut - olisi tehnyt Venäjästä suuren Välimeren merivoiman. Kaupallisesta näkökulmasta ryssän kulku Intiaan ja Australaasiaan suuntautuvien reittien haavoittuvan osan läpi olisi ollut aivan vitun vituttavaa länkkäreille. Ja on vieläkin.
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 634: Tämä oli taustalla tapahtumille, jotka toivat Turkin ensimmäiseen maailmansotaan keskusvaltojen puolella, tapahtumalla, jolla oli niin traagiset seuraukset Antantille. Turkin sodan tuhoisten tulosten valossa historioitsijoilla on ollut tapana kuvata brittiläisiä toimia, erityisesti sodan alkamisen Euroopassa ja Turkin sodanjulistusten välisenä aikana marraskuun 1914 alussa, kyvyttömyyden ja kyvyttömyyden yhdisteenä. Kyvyttömyys+kyvyttömyys = tyhmyys. Tärkeimmät tapahtumat todellakin tekevät vaikeaksi selittää muutoin Britannian asennetta aikoinaan ystävälliseen valtioon, jonka puolueettomuus olisi suuresti auttanut Britannian sotaponnisteluja. Mutta tyhmä on tyhmä vaikka sen voissa paistaisi.
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 658: Aika, josta tämä teos saa erityistä tietoa, on jaettu kuuteen ajanjaksoon, joista toiseen, 80-120 jKr., sisältyy "Ihmeiden aika", jonka historia tulee olemaan spiritualisteja kiinnostava keinona. vertaamalla aikamme näkymättömien älykkyyden ilmenemismuotoja samankaltaisiin tapahtumiin välittömästi kristinuskon käyttöönoton jälkeen. Apollonius Tyanaeus oli tuon ajanjakson merkittävin henkilö, ja hän näki tusinan Rooman keisarin hallituskauden. Ennen syntymäänsä Proteus, Egyptiläinen jumala ilmestyi äidilleen ja ilmoitti, että hänen oli määrä inkarnoitua tulevaan lapseen. Hiän meni unessa annettujen ohjeiden mukaan niitylle keräämään kukkia. Siellä ollessaan joutsenparvi muodosti kuoron ympärille ja lauloivat yhteen ääneen taputtaen siipiään.Heidän kihloissaan ja hellävaraisen sefiirin puhaltaessa ilmaa syntyi Apollonius. Mieleen juolahtaa Yeazin runo britti jouzenesta Irlannin Ledan pukilla.
    xxx/ellauri293.html on line 673: The behavioral economics concept on "nudging" people's behavior and actions is often illustrated with this urinal with a housefly image embossed in the enamel; the image "nudges" users into improving their aim, which lowers cleaning costs.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 46: Tintagel on 1 Mortonin pienenä unelmoimista paikoista. Se on Cornwallissa jossain niemenkärjen pohjoisrannalla. Kuten Geoffreyn suositussa historiassa kuvataan, Gorlois, Cornwallin herttua, laittoi vaimonsa Igrainen Tintagoliin sodan aikana (posuit eam in oppido Tintagol in littore maris: "hän laittoi hänet oppidum Tintagoliin meren rannalla"). Merlin naamioi Uther Pendragonin Gorloisiksi, jotta Uther voisi tulla Tintageliin ja "kyllästää" Igreenin teeskennellen olevansa Gorlois; Utherin ja Igrainen lapsi oli kuningas Arthur. Tästä motiivista tuli Arthurin vakio alkuperätarina myöhemmissä keskiaikaisissa kronikoissa ja ritarillisissa romansseissa. Jotkut Tristanin ja Iseultin legendan tapahtumat sijoittuvat myös Tintageliin.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 48: Geoffrey of Monmouthin tarina jatkuu selittäen tarkkaan kuinka velho Merlin kutsutaan ja muuttaa taianomaisesti Utherin ulkonäön Gorloisin ulkonäöksi auttaakseen heidät pääsemään Tintagelin linnaan, samalla kun hän muuttaa hänen ja Ulfinin esiintymiset kahden Gorloisin kumppanin ulkonäöksi. Näin naamioituneena he pääsevät Tintageliin, missä Uther toistuvasti "menee Igraineen" koko kynttilänjalan pituudelta, ja "sinä yönä sikisi kuuluisin miehistä Arthur." Kirpeästi kirkaisten juna lähti menemään viehättävän laaxon lävize... Kultaseni, ei nyt, minulla on igreeni.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 87: Saladin valtasi kaupungin ristiretkeläisiltä vuonna 1187 ja ristiretkeläisten vastahyökkäys kohti Tiberiasta johti tuhoisaan Hattivattien taisteluun ja ristiretkeläisten vallan luhistumiseen suurissa osissa aluetta. Maimonides vieraili kaupungissa ja hänet haudattiin Tiberiakseen vuonna 1206. Ristiretkeläiset valtasivat silti kaupungin takaisin vuonna 1240 menettäen sen uudelleen vuonna 1247. Seuraavan vuosisadan puolella vuonna 1325 matkailija Ibn Battuta kuvaili pettyneenä kaupungin olevan raunioina. Kaupunki oli jälleen raunioina 1600-luvulla.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 100: No, Paavali vietiin sotilasvartiossa räminää pitäen nykyiseen Ras-el-Ainiin. Ainiin, nuo Antipatris-jäännökset tunnetaan nykyhepreaxi nimellä Tel Afek. Afekin taistelun aikana Samulin kertoman mukaan filistealaiset voittivat israelilaisten armeijan ja valloittivat liitonarkin. Jotkut tutkijat kallistuvat siihen, että Samuelin nolot tapahtumat ovat historiallisia, ja jotkut oppineet taipuvat vähemmän. Katso myös raamatullinen minimalismi ja raamatullinen maksimalismi. Näiden osapuolten välinen keskustelu pyörii pääasiassa yhden suuren kysymyksen ympärillä: Salomon ja Daavidin yhdistyneen valtakunnan olemassaolosta tai olemattomuudesta. Erimielisyyksiensä vuoksi minimalisti-maksimalistisille suhteille on ollut ominaista kiihtynyt retoriikka ja toistuvia henkilökohtaisia hyökkäyksiä. What else is new.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 289:
  • Synnyinseudun historiaa
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 314:
    Synnyinseudun historiaa

    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 316: Erno Paasilinna ryhtyi vähitellen hakemaan etäisyyttä päiväkohtaiseen vittuiluun keskittymällä historiassa tapahtuneisiin vittumaisiin asioihin. Toinen maailmansota ja erityisesti se, kuinka hän sen henkilökohtaisesti koki, purkautuivat lopulta 1980-luvun alkupuolella kaksiosaisena Petsamoa käsittelevänä kirjasarjana. Paasilinna kuvasi Petsamon historian vittumaisena ja epäoikeudenmukaisena tapahtumasarjana, jossa suomalaiset toivat seudulle sivistyksen ja hyvinvoinnin, kunnes tulivat venäläiset ja kuorivat kermat pullasta. Paasilinnan osa oli paeta muun perheen kanssa seudulta sillä seurauksella, että perhe joutui sietämään sekä vittumaisia taloudellisia olosuhteita että vittumaista kohtelua vuosikymmenixi eteenpäin.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 393: Nyt on Kiinalla vain 350 ydinkärkeä, mutta 2035 mennessä niitä voi olla jo 2500. Se hermostuttaa G7:ää Hiroshimassa missä Zhelensky kävi halaamassa tuhkaläjää. 100K viurusilmää menehtyi siinä silmänräpäyksessä. Vähän näyttää siltä että pommit on lakanneet porukoita pelottamasta nyt kun on apinoiden lähtölaskenta muutenkin jo alkanut. Not with a whisper but a bang. Laaki ja paljon vainaita.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 443: Miehiä on soitimella naaraita enemmän. Huonosti pärjäävistä miehistä tulee marisevia ja/tai väkivaltaisia inceleitä. Alfat paukuttavat hensceleitä ja nylkyttävät kaikkia.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 469: Muutkaan hahmot eivät tarjoa sen suurempia yllätyksiä. Kirjaston yläkerrassa asustava Jyri työskentelee rautakaupassa ja on miehenä (tietenkin) kiinnostunut sotahistoriasta ja Karjalasta. Ilman ironian häivääkään hän tuntee suurta ylpeyttä siitä, että saa osallistua kylän yhteisiin talkoisiin ja kuunnella vanhojen ihmisten tarinoita menneistä ajoista. Nuorelle isännälle Jannelle Joenpolvi on sentään suonut yhden heikkouden: häntä alkaa huimata, jos hän näkee verta. Tää on lainattu Doc Martinilta Netflixistä.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 545: Muut historialliset kirjat
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 640: “Valac? Seere? Mitä täällä oikein tapahtuu?” Me molemmat käännähdimme. Rahab seisoi ovella tuijottaen meitä silmät leiskuen. Hän astui tasanteelle. Yönmustat liinat sitoivat hänen siipiään. Vartiomiehiä seurasi hänen perässään miekat tai keihäät kourissaan. Me peräännyimme tasanteen reunalle. “Mitä te kaksi kuvittelette tekevänne?” Rahab sihisi hampaidensa välissä. Me katsoimme toisiamme.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 674: Thomas Malcolm Muggeridge (24 March 1903 – 14 November 1990) was an English journalist and satirist. His father, H. T. Muggeridge, was a socialist politician and one of the early Labour Party Members of Parliament (for Romford, in Essex). In his twenties, Muggeridge was attracted to communism and went to live in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, and the experience turned him into an anti-communist. In the aftermath of the war, he converted to Christianity under the influence of Hugh Kingsmill and helped to bring Mother Teresa to popular attention in the West. He was also a critic of the sexual revolution and of drug use. Muggeridge´s politics changed from an independent socialist point of view to a conservative religious stance. Muggeridge senior pyöri todnäk haudassa kuin hyrrä.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 676: Increasingly disillusioned by his close observation of communism in practice, Muggeridge decided to investigate reports of the famine in Ukraine by travelling there and to the Caucasus without first obtaining the permission of the Soviet authorities. His accounts helped to confirm the extent of a forced famine, which was politically unmotivated at the time. Muggeridge sacked The Pooh illustrator Shepard from Punch. Pooh was not Christopher Robin's Teddy but his own son's bear Growler. Eventually Shepard came to resent "that silly old bear" as he felt that the Pooh illustrations overshadowed his other work.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 678: Muggeridge was described as having predatory behaviour towards women. He was described as a "compulsive groper", reportedly being nicknamed "The Pouncer" and as "a man fully deserving of the acronym NSIT—not safe in taxis". His niece confirmed the facts, while also reflecting on the suffering inflicted on his family and saying that he changed his behaviour slightly when he converted to Christianity in the 1960s.
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 680: In 1979, along with Mervyn Stockwood, the Bishop of Southwark, Muggeridge appeared on the chat show Friday Night, Saturday Morning to discuss the film Life of Brian with Monty Python members John Cleese and Michael Palin. Although the Python members gave reasons that they believed the film to be neither anti-Christian nor mocking the person of Jesus, both Muggeridge and the bishop insisted that they were being disingenuous and that the film was anti-Christian and blasphemous. Muggeridge further declared their film to be "buffoonery", "tenth-rate", "this miserable little film" and "this little squalid number".
    xxx/ellauri295.html on line 682: In 1982, at 79, Muggeridge was received into the Catholic Church after he had rejected Anglicanism, like his wife, Kitty. This was largely under the influence of Mother Teresa about whom he had written a book, Something Beautiful for God, setting out and interpreting her life.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 68: Mutta asiaan. Raamattua tutkistellessa on tärkeä pitää mielessä historian aikajana, joka mulla kyllä on jo jossain paasauxessa (albumi 185). Joosua on moosexenaikuinen valloittaja (14-13 BCE), Samuli myöhäisempi kunkkuvoide (11 BCE). King Charlieta voideltiin nolosti jonkun särmin takana. Nasaretin poikaan ei tittelistä huolimatta levitetty jee-suxivoidetta. Yäk, voiteet ovat ällöttäviä. Jeremiadit kuuluu Babylonin vankeuteen (587-539 BCE). Siinä on vuosisatoja aina välissä. Tosin aika kului hitaammin niinä vuosisatoina, kun oli vähemmän aikaasäästäviä kexintöjä, mutta kului kuitenkin. Ihan eri porukoille oli kotkannenät kulloinkin kiusana, ja kääntäen. Koko länsipuoli pallosta lukee lähi-idän joutomaan telttailijoiden historiankirjoja historiattomasti mieskohtaisena omahoito-oppaana. Outoa.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 80: 1 Niihin aikoihin Juuda lähti pois veljiensä luota ja asettui erään Abdullahissa asuvan miehen luo, joka oli nimeltään Hiram. 2 Siellä Juuda tapasi kanaanilaisen naisen, Suka-nimisen miehen tyttären, otti hänet vaimokseen ja yhtyi häneen takaapäin. 3 Nainen tuli raskaaksi ja synnytti pojan, joka sai nimekseen Er. 4 Sitten nainen tuli jälleen raskaaksi, synnytti pojan ja antoi hänelle nimeksi Onan. 5 Nainen synnytti vielä yhden pojan ja antoi hänelle nimeksi Sela. Juuda oli Selan syntymän aikoihin Kesibissä "lampailla". Suan tyttären nimeä ei Juuda ollut tullut kysyneexi missään vaiheessa joten emme voi sitä tässä tarinassa kertoa. Ei se ole juonen kuljetuxen kannalta tärkeä.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 141: Ensimmäisen temppelin tuhoaminen 587 eKr (fig. 1) oli juutalaisen historian vedenjakaja. Puutteistaan huolimatta juutalainen kansa otti tuhon oppitunnit sydämeensä ja rakensi elämänsä uudelleen fyysisest ja henkisest.Tosiasiat tuhosta ovat riittävän yksinkertaisia. Profeetta Jeremia oli varoittanut tulevasta tuomiosta vuosia. Kirjoittanut Baruk haamukirjoiitajana jeremiadin nimeltä "Eikä!". Juudea eli väärän turvallisuuden tunteen kanssa. Heistä jotenkin tuntui, että he voisivat kapinoida Babylonin valtaa vastaan ja tukea kapinaa. He pettivät itseään Egyptin suojelevan heitä luullen, että heidän eteläinen naapurinsa haluaisi mieluummin kohdata Babylonin Jerusalemista pohjoiseen, mieluummin kuin taisteli heitä omilla rajoillaan. Egypti ei kuitenkaan ollut halukas vuodattamaan pisaraa egyptiläistä verta Juudean puolesta.Toinen harha oli, että babylonialaiset jotenkin unohtaisivat heidät. Babylonin kuningas ei kuitenkaan aikonut päästää Juudeaa luisumaan kiertoradalta. Hän tuli koko armeijansa kanssa tukahduttamaan kapinan – ja hän tuli julmuudella, kostolla ja lopullisuudella. Hän ei vain halunnut opettaa juutalaisille oppituntia, vaan myös tyrmätä kenenkään muun mielen, että voisit jotenkin ylittää Babylonian valtakunnan ja joutua kärsimättä seurauksista. Nebukadnessar tuli pohjoisesta ja tunkeutui Juudean esikaupunkiin. Kesän alkuun mennessä hänen armeijansa oli leiriytynyt Jerusalemin ympärille. Hän katkaisi kaupungin ja kiristi järjestelmällisesti silmukkaa Jerusalemin ympärillä. Tammus-kuun yhdeksäntenä päivänä kaupungin muurit murtuivat ja Babylonian armeija tulvi läpi.Kuukaudessa he olivat tuhonneet kaikki Juudean vastarinnan taskut. Kymmeniä tuhansia kuoli piirityksessä, joka aiheutti nälän ja ruton ja sitten miekan ja tulen. Ne, jotka pystyivät siihen, pakenivat. Babylonialaiset olivat kuitenkin ennakoineet sen ja paimentaneet pakenevia jättiläisorjaleireille, joista heidät (no, osa heistä) kuljetettiin pakkosiirtolaisuuteen Irakiin.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 160: perunoita) vuosisataa myöhemmin samana päivänä, yhdeksäntenä Avia (osapuilleen heinäkuuta). Jos juutalaiset eivät käyttäytyneet kuin kansa, jonka oli tarkoitus edustaa Planeettojen neuvostossa Jumalaa – olla hengellisten johtajien valtakunta ja pyhä kansa (2. Moos. 19:6) – mitä arvoa temppeli oli? Se oli vain puuta, kiveä, tiiliä ja laastia. Jumalan suojeleva käsi, joka ohjaa kaikkea historiassa, poistettiin. Kun se poistettiin, temppeli oli vain tyhjä kuori. "Jos talon omistaja ei ole enää siellä, rosvot voivat ryöstää." Sitä juutalaiset surevat.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 162: Se ei ollut kova ja nopea historian sääntö, että babylonialaisten täytyi voittaa Juudea. Karl Marx myi länsimaiselle sivilisaatiolle ajatuksen siitä, että historiassa on joustamattomia ja väistämättömiä sääntöjä ja ettei yksilö voi missään olosuhteissa muuttaa niitä. Vahvemmat eivät välttämättä pistä hönöön heikommille. On myös banaaninkuoria. Ihminen on vain arpanoppa ja kasa pelinappuloita jumalten muumipelissä.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 165: Kommunismi oli tulevaisuuden aalto; mitkä olivat muutama sata miljoonaa ihmishenkeä edistymisen syynä? Sen täytyy tapahtua. Jos sen täytyy tapahtua, henkilö voi sanoa: "Minä vain autan sitä tapahtumaan; En tee sitä." Ajatus siitä, että on olemassa historiallisia voimia, jotka luovat nämä kataklysmit ja holokaustit, vapauttaa yhden kaikesta vastuusta. Se ei ole minun syyni. Otan vain tilauksia vastaan. Teen vain sen mitä historia sanoo. Juuri tämä mahdollistaa ihmisten olla sellaisia murhaajia. Ei ole yksilöllistä syyllisyyttä tai vastuuta. Jokainen toimii voiman alaisena. Isojen on nieltävä pieni. Heikkojen täytyy kaatua ennen vahvoja. Parhaiden on selviydyttävä banaaninkuorista. Sivilisaatioiden täytyy nousta ja kaatua ja nousta taas kuin Lasse Wiren Münchenissä.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 168: Tooralla on hyvin erilainen näkemys historiasta. Sitä voi muuttaa – ja sitä voi muuttaa yksi henkilö… yhdellä teolla… yksi henkilö. Vladimir Putin esimerkixi. Aivan kuten me olemme niitä, jotka saivat sen tapahtumaan, voimme olla niitä, jotka saavat sen tapahtumaan päinvastaiseen suuntaan. Emme ole syyttömiä tarkkailijoita, jotka ovat juuttuneet vastustamattomiin voimiin, joita kutsutaan nimellä "historia". Olemme osallistujia. Me olemme pelaajia. Me olemme historian kirjoittajia. Me olemme bisnesmiehiä. Me olemme nuoriso. Me olemme tulevaisuus.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 180: otettavaan muinaisen Israelin historiaan, ja on lähes yleisesti hyväksyttyä, että
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 182: vähän historiallista arvoa. Jopa Taavetin yhdistynyt etelä- ja pohjois-Israelin
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 191: minkä vuoxi Raamatun historiallisuus ei ole johdonmukainen koko sen sisällössä.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 194: testamentin kertomuksista historiana. Toiset, kuten arkeologi William G. Dever,
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 219: että historiallisesti pihalla kerrotuista tapahtumista. Markun raportin kömpelö,
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 229: Rehoboam (/ˌriːəˈboʊ.əm/; Hebrew: רְחַבְעָם‎, Rəḥaḇʿām; Greek: Ροβοάμ, Rovoam; Latin: Robocop, transl. "an enlarged penis") was, according to the Hebrew Bible, the first monarch of the Kingdom of Judah after the split of the united Kingdom of Israel. He was a son of and the successor to Solomon and a grandson of David. In the account of I Kings and II Chronicles, Rehoboam saw his ruler limited to only the Kingdom of Judah in the south following a rebellion by the ten northern tribes of Israel in 932/931 BCE, which led to the formation of the independent Kingdom of Israel under the rule of Jeroboam in the north..
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 240: Rabbanic Literaturen mukaan Gehazilla oli magneetti, jolla hän nosti Jerobeamin tekemän epäjumalan, niin että se näkyi taivaan ja maan välissä; hän oli kaivertanut siihen "Yhwh", ja sen seurauksena idoli (vasikka) lausui kaksi ensimmäistä sanaa Dekalogista ("No, minä..."). Mikä tahansa kulttikuva on ipso facto "toinen jumala", YHWH :n mustasukkaisuuden kohde. HBO:n Westworldin kolmannella kaudella ihmisten kohtaloa algoritmisen analyysin avulla saneleva tekoäly on nimeltään Rehoboam. Se on aiemman "Solomon" -nimisen version (joka oli "Davidin" seuraaja) seuraaja. Kuten historiallinen Rehabeam, tämä tekoälyversio osui samaan aikaan kuin sen valmistuslinja lakkasi.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 292:
    James Deen lost his virginity at a Jewish summer camp to a guy who had one this big.

    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 301:
    George Lucas who was born in Russia and has lived in New York and Israel — has been one of the more successful Jews in the industry, as both a gay pornographic actor and an entrepreneur. He is fiercely pro-Israel and pro-gay rights, and in 2009 his film Men of Israel was the first adult movie to feature only gay Jewish actors.

    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 307:
    Seemore Butts or Adam Glasser, take your pick – was born in the Bronx to Jewish parents, whom he has said were involved in the “shmattah business.” Talk about rags to riches! Seemore Butt's net worth 2022 was between $501.1K - $1.8M. Not penniless nor worthless, nossir. His mother Lila has also been involved with the production and distribution of some of his films.

    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 365:
    Avun historia

    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 369: 1940-luku oli sodan ja vaaran vuosien vuosikymmen. Sen loppuun ajoittuu Suomen korkein syntyvyys. Vuonna 1947 syntyi yhteensä 108 168 lasta, Suomen suurin ikäluokka. Lauri Ihalainen on yksi näistä lapsista. Lapsuus Pihtiputaalla oli taloudellisesti niukkaa, mutta henkisesti rikasta, luettiin Suomen Sosialidemokraattia ja kazeltiin Apu- ja Seura-lehtiä. Työuransa Ihalainen teki ammattiyhdistysliikkeessä, hän on SAK:n pitkäaikaisin puheenjohtaja. Ihalaisen mukaan suuret ikäluokat ovat saaneet rakentaa lisääntymiskyvyttöminä työläisinä hyvinvointiyhteiskuntaa ja elää hyvän vaiheen Suomen historiassa.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 616: Cassirerista ajattelijana tuli kantilaisten periaatteiden, mutta myös paljon enemmän, ruumiillistuma kokonaisvaltaiselle henkiliikkeelle, joka ulottuu renessanssista valistukseen ja Herderin historiankäsitykseen, Goethen runouteen, Wilhelm von Humboldtin Kavi-kirlen tutkimukseen, Schellingin Philosophie Der Mythologie, Hegelin Hengen fenomenologia ja Vischerin käsitys esteettisestä symbolista,ym, ym. saxalaista hämäröintiä. Cassirerin oma asema syntyy tämän humanistisen ymmärryksen maailman koko kehityksen hallinnan kautta, johon sisältyi myös ns. tieteellisen maailmankuvan hallinta, joka näkyy sekä hänen historiallisissa teoksissaan että systemaattisessa filosofiassaan."
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 624: Vuonna 1929 Cassirer osallistui historiallisesti merkittävään kohtaamiseen Martin Heideggerin kanssa Davosissa toisen Davos Hochschulkursin aikana ( Cassirer–Heidegger-keskustelu ).
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 643: 1925 oli mythisches Denken eli satuilu Ernstistä vielä hyvä idea ja ajoi idealismin asiaa, mutta jenkeissä 1945 satusedän kelkka oli kääntynyt nazisminvastaisexi. [Tässä referoitu sepustus on joltain mainzilaiselta maisterinnalta ja aika sekava.]
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 650: Keinen Zusammenhang zwischen dem primitiven, mythischen oder prälogischen und dem modernen logischen Denken sieht dagegen der Jude Lucien Lévy-Bruhl (1857-1939).
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 651: Cassirer gibt selbst keine philosophische Theorie des mythischen Denkens. Er glaubt, dass keine rationale Einsicht in das mythische Denken möglich wäre, wenn es keine Verbindung zwischen beiden Denkarten gäbe. Noch eine Judenmeinung.
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 653: Das Leben ist in erster Linie „von Affekten, nicht von Gedanken“, wie sie im Mythos in „epischer“ Weise ausgedrückt werden, geprägt. Während rituelle Handlungen den „wahren Weg zu Gott“ darstellen, sind die mythischen Geschichten nur ihre Interpretation. „Was im dionysischen Kult getrunken wird, wird im Mythus erklärt.“
    xxx/ellauri296.html on line 676: Arbeit zitieren: Magistra Artium Silvia Bielert (Autor:in), 2005, Ernst Cassirer - Mythos und mythisches Denken in der antiken Philosophie bis zu Platons Staatstheorie, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/47039. Noch keine Kommentare.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 102: Yrjö Alasimen kirjasta Doston hyvä ja paha Patti ei perustanut. Ei Stavro ollut paha, se oli onneton, silmät kyynelissä työnsi syylämunaa pikku Marjan paljaaseen. Tämä artikkeli kertoo psykiatrista. Yrjö Alanen (1860–1944) oli pappi ja kirjailija. Yrjö J. E. Alanen (1890–1960) oli teologian professori. Yrjö Alanen, ent. Näykki, (21. helmikuuta 1860 Kauhava – 20. toukokuuta 1944 Kurikka) oli suomalainen kirkkoherra, kirjailija ja historiantutkija. Alasen vanhemmat olivat talollinen Jaakko Alanäykki (Sippola) ja Valpuri Amalia Kustaantytär Ylänäykki. Yrjö Alanen oli naimisissa vuodesta 1888 Helmi Maria Karstenin kanssa, jonka veli oli uskontotieteilijä ja filosofi, tutkimusmatkailija Rafael Karsten. Koleerinen Rafuko oli vanhojen herrojen setä? Ei vaan Roope-eno, oikaisi Jönsy asiantuntijana. Yrjö Alasen ja Helmi Maria Karstenin lapsia olivat lääkintöneuvos ja Kurikan kunnanlääkäri Aarne Alanen, teologian professori Yrjö J. E. Alanen, sairaanhoitaja ja kielten maisteri Aili Alanen, oikeustieteen professori ja evankelinen maallikkopuhuja Aatos Alanen, sairaanhoitaja Aune Alanen, pankkivirkailija ja juristi Sylvi Alanen sekä professori ja historioitsija Aulis J. Alanen. Yrjö Olavi Alanen (30. tammikuuta 1927 Kurikka – 26. joulukuuta 2022) oli suomalainen psykoterapiaan erikoistunut psykiatri, neurologi ja tutkija. Hän oli Turun yliopiston psykiatrian professori. Yrjö O. Alanen on oman alansa kirjallisuuden lisäksi kirjoittanut kaksi muistelmateosta sekä teoxen Yrjö O. Alanen: Dostojevskin hyvä ja paha, 1981. Hänen väitöskirjansa aiheena oli The Mothers of Schizophrenic Patients.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 172: Syntynyt vuonna 1946, kasvoin tuolloin kukoistavassa tehdaskaupungissa Länsi-Pennsylvaniassa, Yhdysvalloissa kymmenen mailia länteen Ohio-joen varrella Pittsburghista, jota silloin kutsuttiin "Terässtadixi". Varhaisesta lapsuudestani lähtien äitini oli vakavasti masentunut ja perheeni jatkuvassa konfliktissa. Samaan aikaan isäni, alun perin viulisti, antoi minulle lahjan rakkauden klassiseen musiikkiin. Hän opetti minulle, kuinka kuunnella, ei vain äidin valituxen pääteemoja, vaan myös koko musiikkipartituuria bassoista korkeisiin puupuhaltimiin. Meidän perheemme oli yksi harvoista juutalaisperheistä suurelta osin italialaisessa katolisessa kaupungissa. Suurimman osan ajasta ala-asteella ja lukiossa tunsin olevani ulkopuolinen ja minulla oli heikko yhteenkuuluvuuden tunne. Juutalaisten käyttö ravunsyöttinä oli yleistä, ja yritin epätoivoisesti kompensoida auttamalla opiskelutovereita kotitehtävissä. Silti minua pidettiin enimmäkseen käsivarren päässä, ja leimattuna roolilla "aivot". Kun osallistuin heprealaiseen kouluun useita päiviä viikossa useiden vuosien ajan Pittsburghin juutalaisella alueella, olin sielläkin "ulkopuolinen", koska olin kotoisin pikkukaupungista enkä Pittsburghin kletschmersektiosta. Yhdessä nämä lopulta ovat osittain taustalla kiinnostukseni antropologiaan, etnisiin ja amerikkalaisiin tutkimuksiin, usein tiedostamattoman koetun kokemuksen psykoanalyyttiseen syvyyteen, halukkuuteeni kokonaisvaltaiseen ajatteluun (yrityxeen yhdistää ne, jotka aluksi vaikuttavat erillisiltä, toisiinsa liittymättömiltä kulttuurin puolilta, perhe ja historia), tarkkaavaisuuteeni itseäni kohtaan tutkimusvälineenä, jota kutsutaan vastasiirroksi), oman runouden käyttämiseen keinona ymmärtää työelämän organisaatioita ja laajempaa kulttuuria) ja pyrkimykseni auttaa muita ihmisiä, järjestöt, jopa kansainvälisiä suhteita kuuntelemalla syvästi ihmisiä ja auttamalla heitä kuuntelemaan toisiaan sielusta sieluun. Tämä oli keskeinen roolini kroonikkona ja noin viisikymmentä vuotta lääketieteen opiskelijoiden, perhelääketieteen harjoittelijoiden ja asukkaiden, PA:iden ja monien muiden terveydenhuollon ammattilaisten opettajana. Syvästä kiinnostuksestani organisaatioelämän tiedostamattomiin juuriin tuli perusta suurelle osalle tutkimuksestani, kirjoittamisestani, opettamisestani ja konsultoinnistani. Opiskelin Pittsburghin yliopistossa ja suoritin historiallisen musiikkitieteen AB:n vuonna 1967 ja psykologisen antropologian tohtorin vuonna 1972. Opetettuani seitsemän vuotta psykiatrian osastolla Meharry Medical Collegessa Nashvillessä, TN:ssä, vietin loput urani perhe- ja ennaltaehkäisevän lääketieteen osastolla Oklahoman terveystieteiden yliopistossa. Center, Oklahoma City, OK, sellainen minä olin."
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 176: Tutkimukseni, sovellettu antropologia/psykoanalyysi/runous ja ammatillinen panokseni sijaitsevat monien akateemisten alojen ja kiinnostuksen kohteiden lähentymis-/leikkauspisteessä: niiden joukossa soveltava, psykoanalyyttinen, lääketieteellinen ja organisaatioantropologia; psykohistoria; työpaikkaorganisaatioiden psykoanalyyttinen tutkimus; maaseudun lääketiede ja maaseudun terveys; maaseudun Oklahoma, vehnänviljely perheet ja kulttuuri; Oklahoman kulttuuri; poliittinen psykologia; etniset tutkimukset; etnisyys amerikkalaisessa elämässä; 1960-luvun lopun ja 1970-luvun White Ethnic Revitalization Movement ja muut elvyttämisliikkeet/kriisikultit, kuten Donald Trumpin liike; Amerikan opinnot; Slaavi-Itä-Euroopan tutkimus; "hallitun yhteiskunnallisen muutoksen" psykodynaaminen tutkiminen 1980-luvun alusta lähtien (esim. supistaminen, RIFing, uudelleensuunnittelu, uudelleenjärjestelyt, osaamisen poistaminen, ulkoistaminen/offshoring, hallinnoitu terveydenhuolto jne.); sääntelyn purkamisen kulttuurinen psykodynamiikka; Trumpin aikakauden psykodynaaminen-kulttuurinen tutkimus; tarinankerronta ja tarinan kuuntelu organisaatioissa ja sen ulkopuolella; soveltavan runouden käyttö organisaatio- ja kulttuuritutkimuksessa, tulkinnassa, selityksessä ja konsultaatiossa; "syvä kuuntelemisen" tärkeys. Suuri osa organisaatiopsykodynaamisista kirjoituksistani ja Trumpin aikakaudesta kirjoituksistani on saanut vaikutteita heimoveljiltä Michael Diamondilta ja Seth Allcornilta ja usein yhteistyössä heidän kanssaan. Vuosikymmenten aikana monet kollegat useilla aloilla ovat kertoneet minulle (usein hylkääessään lehti- ja kirjakäsikirjoituksia), että vaikka ideani ovat aina mielenkiintoisia, ne "eivät ole kalaa eikä lintuja", että ne eivät sovi mihinkään akateemiseen erikoisalaan, että ne putoavat halkeamien väliin. Minulla on ollut onni matkan varrella löytää paikkoja ja ihmisiä, joissa tämä on pikemminkin hyve kuin kohtalokas virhe. Kaikesta tästä on syntynyt noin 32 julkaistua kirjaa (mukaan lukien 10 runokirjaa ja chapbookia), yli 200 julkaistua lukua ja esseetä sekä yli 700 runoa.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 199: What say? This poem was
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 216: his talk the other day. ‘Down there you’ll breathe And not choke.’ The more
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 235: this poem helps people to feel understood and not discounted.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 241: situations. This poem illustrates one such usage.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 254: doctor said he will never forget The mother's face. I will Never forget his. I
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 257: This poem was inspired by an actual clinical case. About ten physicians and I were sitting
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 263: them as well as to the ‘case’ they were narrating.This led to the sudden shift of
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 265: doctors. After finishing this masterpiece I mailed it to all the physicians who
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 284: at sea to her very diligent work as an apprentice physician. Shortly after this
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 292: My final poem in this paper is called ‘Watchman’s
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 301: Although the Worcester fire was the precipitating event for this poem, the poem is not only
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 312: At this point I invite the reader to consider several questions in relation to the
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 315: reader utilize this method in his or her own organizational research and
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 347: Hullusta William Reichista on useita aiempia mainintoja, mm. albumeissa 186 ja 232.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 349: Wilhelm Reich ( / r aɪ x / RYKHE, saksa: [ˈvɪlhɛlm ˈʁaɪç] ; 24. maaliskuuta 1897 – 3. marraskuuta 1957) oli itävaltalainen lääketieteen tohtori ja psykoanalyytikko, Sigmund Freudin jälkeisen toisen analyytikkopolven jäsen. Useiden vaikutusvaltaisten kirjojen kirjoittaja, The Impulsive Character (1925), The Function of the Orgasm (1927), Character Analysis (1933) ja The Mass Psychology of Fascism (1933), hänestä tuli yksi radikaaleimmista hahmoista. psykiatrian historiassa.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 351: Reichin haamutyö auttoi Anna Freudin The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense (1936) -teoksen kehitystä ja hänen ajatuksensa lihaspanssarista – persoonallisuuden ilmentymisestä kehon liiketavassa – muokkasi innovaatioita, kuten kehon psykoterapiaa, Gestaltterapia, bioenergeettinen analyysi ja primaaliterapia. Hänen kirjoituksensa vaikutti älymystön sukupuolielämään; hän loi ilmauksen "seksuaalinen vallankumous" ja erään historioitsijan mukaan toimi kätilönä.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 353: Hän muutti New Yorkiin vuonna 1939 hyväksyttyään apulaisprofessorin paikan New School of Social Researchissa. Viiden Oslo-vuotensa aikana hän oli keksinyt termin " orgone energy" - sanoista "orgasmi" ja "organismi" - elämänenergian käsitteelle. Vuonna 1940 hän alkoi rakentaa orgoniakkuja, muunneltuja Faradayn häkkejä, joiden hän väitti olevan hyödyllisiä syöpäpotilaille. Hän väitti, että hänen laboratoriosyöpähiirillä oli ollut merkittäviä positiivisia vaikutuksia Faradayn häkissä pitämisellä, joten hän rakensi ihmiskokoisia versioita, joissa voi istua sisällä. Tämä johti lehtijuttuihin "seksilaatikoista", jotka paransivat syöpää.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 368: "Cloudbusting" johtui hänen inspiraatiostaan muuttaa Peter Reichin unelmakirjan todellinen tarina lauluksi. Vuonna 1973 julkaistu kirja kertoo kauhistuttavan tarinan hänen isänsä Wilhelmin pidätyksestä tuomioistuimen halveksunnan vuoksi. Wilhelm Reich oli itävaltalainen psykiatri, jonka Sigmund Freud koulutti Wienissä; hän oli uraauurtava hahmo psykologiassa, mutta hän oli myös erittäin kiistanalainen hahmo, joka ajatteli maverick-tyyppisellä tavalla.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 383:

    Psykohistoriaa


    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 387: Vaikka Mickey deMousen psykoanalyyttinen historia on hanurimusiikkia, sen aikana tulee esiin ilmeisiä faktoja:
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 439: "La cumparsita" on uruguaylaisen muusikon Gerardo Matos Rodríguezin vuonna 1916 kirjoittama tango, jonka sanoittivat argentiinalaiset Pascual Contursi ja Enrique Pedro Maroni [es]. Se on yksi kaikkien aikojen tunnetuimmista ja tunnistetuimmista tangoista. Roberto Firdo, kappaleen kantaesittäneen orkesterin johtaja ja pianisti, lisäsi osia tangoistaan "La gaucha Manuela" ja "Turda completa" Matoksen karnevaalimarssiin ("La cumparsita"), jolloin tuloksena on "La cumparsita", kuten se tällä hetkellä tunnetaan. "La cumparsita" soitettiin ensimmäisen kerran julkisesti vanhassa Café La Giraldassa Montevideossa, Uruguayssa. Montevideon hanurimuseo sijaitsee tällä hetkellä tällä historiallisella paikalla.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 451: When, under the authenticité policy of the early 1970s, Zairians were obliged to adopt "authentic" names, Mobutu dropped Joseph-Désiré and officially changed his name to Mobutu Sese Seko Kuku Ngbendu Wa Za Banga, or, more commonly, Mobutu Sésé Seko, roughly meaning "the all-conquering warrior, who goes from triumph to triumph", tai (väittää Patti) "kukko joka ei jätä yhtään kanaa rauhaan". Kana on suahilixi kyllä Kuku.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 503: Ei ihmekään että Patti on tollanen sekopää, tollasilla lapsuusmuistoilla. Pelkkää posttraumaattista stressioiretta koko mies, oidipaalisuuden ohessa. Pahasti kesken jäänyt ihminen. Kirjailijaan ei pure imperfekti, se on praesens historicum, toivoo Patti-Makkonen, mutta ei se kyllä mikään Goethe ole.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 526:
    Stan Christinan ja Brigitten kynsissä. Kolleegoilta on vizit vähissä.

    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 625: Valde lives in Finland, Kaarina, in little commune with his friends and cats. He started the Holotropic Breathwork training in 2016 and got certified in 2019. He is organizing regularly Holotropic Breathwork workshops and private sessions in Finland, as a one of the founders of Holotropic Breathwork Finland Association. Me Nordic Breathingissa uskomme, että hengittäminen on hyvinvoivan ihmisen tärkein tarve. Samaan aikaan kuitenkin hengitysongelmat koskettavat miljardeja ihmisiä maailmassa, ja kasvihuoneilmiön ansiosta potentiaalisten asiakkaiden määrä on vain kasvamassa. Suunnitelmissa on vangita kierrätettyä hengitysilmaa ekologisiin paperipusseihin ja maalata se punaisexi.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 633: Campbellin mielestä uskonnolliset symbolit tulisi tulkita monomaanisixi mytologisiksi meemeixi eikä historiallisiksi faktoiksi, jolloin symboleissa voidaan alkaa nähdä syvempiä merkityksiä. Campbell's theories have been applied by a wide variety of modern writers and artists. His philosophy has been summarized by his own often repeated phrase: "Follow your bliss." He sure did, fucking hedonist.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 637: On the ship during his return trip from an old world tour he encountered the messiah elect of the Theosophical Society, Jiddu Krishnamurti; they discussed Indian philosophy (that Jiddu had up to his gills by then), sparking in Campbell an interest in Hindu and Indian thought. Lacking faculty approval, Campbell withdrew from graduate studies, becoming a close friend of the budding writer John Steinbeck and his wife Carol. Campbell had an affair with Carol. Campbell too began writing a novel on the "Doc" of Cannery Row but unlike Steinbeck, did not complete his book, instead published a lot of trash on mythology and got rich(er).
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 639: Campbell attended a Grateful Dead concert in 1986, and marveled that "Everyone has just lost themselves in everybody else here!" Campbell died at his home in Honolulu, Hawaii, on October 30, 1987, from complications of esophageal cancer. The works of Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche had a profound effect on Campbell's thinking; he quoted their writing frequently. Sinclair's Babbitt did not follow his (Joe's) bliss, while Schopenhauer ans Nietzsche did, enviously watching Joseph hump his best friend's wife. Jung's insights into archetypes were heavily influenced by the Bardo Thodol (also known as The Tibetan Book of the Dead, an interesting tidbit on the side).
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 641: As a strong believer in the psychic unity of mankind and its poetic expression through mythology, Campbell made use of the Brigitte Bardot (BB) concept to express the idea that the whole of the human race can be seen as engaged in the effort of making the world "transparent to transcendence" by showing that underneath the world of phenomena (like Carol's underwear) lies an eternal source of bliss which is constantly pouring its energies into this world of time, suffering, and ultimately death. To achieve this task one needs to speak about things that existed before and beyond words, a seemingly impossible task, the solution to which lies in the metaphors found in myths. Words, words, words.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 643: The basic structure, however, of all the boring "quest" type stories has remained relatively unchanged and can be classified using the various stages of a hero's adventure through the story, stages such as the Call to Adventure, Receiving Supernatural Aids, Meeting with the Goddess/Atonement with the Father and Return. (This part Joe took from Propp.) He thinks of a meme such as in the sentence "Jesus is the Son of God" rather as "the relationship of man to God is like that of a son to a father". A clear case of an arianist
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 676: järjestyksen ja vahvistaa sen heijastamalla sen tarinoihin kuten Marvel Comics, usein kuvaillen kuinka järjestys tuli jumalallisen tai vähintään teräsmiehisen väliintulon seurauksena.
    xxx/ellauri298.html on line 707: Itse asiassa Campbell "opetti", ts. väitti, että ihmiskunta on kautta historian uskonut siihen, että kaikki elämä tulee ja palaa toiseen ulottuvuuteen, joka ylittää ajallisuuden, mutta joka
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 80: Ordet Leviatan omnämns även i Rashis kommentarer till Första Moseboken 1:21: "Och Gud skapade de stora havsdjuren och hela det stim av levande varelser, som vattnet vimlar av, efter deras arter...". Marcus Jastrow översätter ordet "Taninim" med sjöodjur, krokodil eller stor orm. I sina kommentarer skriver Rashi att "enligt legenden refererar detta till Leviatan och hans maka. Gud skapade en manlig och en kvinnlig Leviatan, dödade sedan honan och saltade den åt de rättrådiga, för om Leviatanerna skulle avla av sig skulle världen inte kunna framträda inför dem."
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 131: Pastori Norman Thomas oli jutkukommarien hampaissa. Thomas oli wimpy pasifisti. It was Thomas's position as a conscientious objector that drew him to the Socialist Party of America (SPA), a staunchly antimilitarist organization. When SPA leader Morris Hillquit made his campaign for mayor of New York in 1917 on an antiwar platform, Thomas wrote to him expressing his good wishes. To his surprise, Hillquit wrote back, encouraging the young minister to work for his campaign, which Thomas energetically did. Soon thereafter he himself joined the Socialist Party. Thomas was a Christian socialist. Eihän siitä tullut lasta eikä paskaakaan. De amerikanska kapitalisterna var inte ens kloka nog att kontrollera sina egna organisationer. Amerikansk kapitalism saknade klassmedvetande och vanligt politiskt egenintresse. Nu har dom lärt sin läxa nog. Det är inte socialismen där en individ har värde, utan kapitalismen, där det mäts i dollars.
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 260: Kaikkiaan hänen teoksiaan painettiin kymmenen, ja useita muita oli painettavaxi kelpaamattomia. Hänen teoksensa ovat todiste ReMO:n monipuolisesta oppimisesta ja suuruudesta Talmudissa sekä filosofiassa, tähtitiedossa ja historiassa.
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 358: Grein epilogiseeraa ihan loppuviimexi Iisakin oman käsityxen hasidismista: hassut hatut ja pölykapselit on lieka petomaisten juutalaisten kaulassa. Ei se estä niitä olemasta petomaisia, mutta voi toimia edes hidasteena. Hmm no jaa, tiedän parempaa. Tekee mieli sanoa että älä unta nää. Y asi finaliza esta historia, Singerin postuumi teos on nyt kuurnittu.
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 426: Ortodoksinen juutalaisuus korostaa koulutusohjelmissaan useita perusperiaatteita, joista tärkeintä on uskoa siihen, että on yksi ainoa, kaikkitietävä , transsendentti , ei-yhdistetty Jumala , joka loi maailmankaikkeuden ja on edelleen huolissaan sen hallinnasta. Perinteinen juutalaisuus väittää, että Jumala teki liiton juutalaisten kanssa Siinain vuorella ja ilmoitti heille lakinsa ja 613 käskynsä kirjoitetun ja suullisen Tooran muodossa . Rabbiinijuutalaisuudessa Toora koostuu molemmista kirjoitetusta Toorasta ( Pentateuk) ja suullisen lain perinne, josta suuri osa myöhemmin kodifioitiin pyhissä kirjoituksissa (ks. Mishna , Talmud ).
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 439: "Judaismi hylkää jyrkästi kaiken käsitteen moninaisuudesta suhteessa Jumalaan", hylkäämällä nimenomaisesti polyteismin , dualismin ja kolminaisuuden , jotka ovat "yhteensopimattomia juutalaisuuden ymmärtämän monoteismin kanssa". Jumalan ykseys mainitaan monta kertaa juutalaisessa perinteessä. Se on toinen Maimonidesin 13 uskon periaatteesta; Maimonides kirjoitti, että "Tämä Jumala on yksi, ei kaksi tai useampi kuin kaksi, ei edes kaksi puoli eikä nolla, vaan Yksi, jonka ykseys on erilainen kuin kaikki muut olemassa olevat yksiköt. Hän ei ole yksi, koska suku, joka sisältää monia lajeja, on yksi. Hän ei myöskään ole yksi. yksi ruumiina, joka sisältää osia ja ulottuvuuksia, on yksi. Mutta Hänen on yhtenäisyys, jota ei ole missään muualla" (Yad ,Yesode Ha-Toora 1:7). Tämä oli hyvä esimerkki e-munahista käytännössä.
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 447: Vaikka yleinen juutalainen asenne on ollut, että Jumala loi maailman ex nihilo, rabbi Marc D. Angel kirjoittaa, että historiallisesti "juutalaisessa perinteessä on ollut yleinen vastahakoisuus spekuloida luomisen metafyysisiä puolia". Lyhyesti sanottuna juutalaisuus vaatii, että Jumala loi maailman, että hän loi sen vaiheittain ja että hän jatkaa jollain lailla luomansa maailmankaikkeuden ylläpitämistä talonmiehenä Luomisprosessin yksityiskohdat tai siihen käytetyt materiaalit eivät ole keskeisiä juutalaiselle ajattelulle. Lehtimajankin saa rakentaa puusta, muovista tai pellistä.
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 469: Talmud on tuhansien vuosien juutalaisen viisauden ja suullisen lain kokoelma, joka on yhtä vanha ja merkittävä kuin kirjoitettu laki (Toora) ilmaistaan siinä. Se on lain, legendan ja filosofian yhdistelmä, sekoitus ainutlaatuista logiikkaa ja taitavaa pragmatismia, historiaa ja tiedettä, anekdootteja ja huumoria... Vaikka sen päätavoitteena on tulkita ja kommentoida lakikirjaa, se on samalla taideteos, joka ylittää lainsäädännön ja sen käytännön soveltamisen. Ja vaikka Talmud on tähän päivään asti juutalaisen lain ensisijainen lähde, sitä ei voida mainita vallanpitäjänä...
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 484: Toora koostuu viidestä kirjasta, joita kutsutaan englanniksi Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numeri ja Deuteronomia. Ne kertovat heprealaisten historiasta ja sisältävät myös käskyt, joita juutalaisten on noudatettava, etenkin osa 3 Leviticus.
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 513: Jumala valitsi pitkään mietittyään juutalaisen kansan olemaan ainutlaatuisessa liitossa Jumalan kanssa; tämän liiton kuvaus on itse Toora . Vastoin yleistä käsitystä juutalaiset eivät vain sano, että "Jumala valitsi juutalaiset". Tätä väitettä sinänsä ei ole missään Tanakhissa ( juutalaisen Raamatun). Tällainen väite voisi tarkoittaa, että Jumala rakastaa vain juutalaista kansaa, että vain juutalaiset voivat olla lähellä Jumalaa ja että vain juutalaiset voivat saada taivaallisen palkinnon. Varsinainen väite on, että juutalaiset valittiin tiettyyn tehtävään, velvollisuuteen: olla valona kansoille ja tehdä liitto Jumalan kanssa Toorassa kuvatulla tavalla . Rekonstruktionistinen juutalaisuus hylkää jopa tämän valinnan muunnelman moraalisesti kuolleeksi.
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 515: Rabbi Lordi Immanuel Jakobovits, entinen Iso-Britannian Yhdistyneen Synagogan päärabbi, kuvaa juutalaisten valtavirran näkemystä tästä asiasta: "Kyllä, uskon, että valittu kansajuutalaisuuden pyhissä kirjoituksissaan, rukouksissaan ja tuhatvuotisperinneissään vahvistaman käsityksen. Itse asiassa uskon, että jokainen kansa – ja todellakin rajoitetulla tavalla jokainen yksilö – on "valittu" tai määrätty johonkin erilliseen tarkoitukseen Providencen suunnitelmien edistämisessä. Amalekin siemenen tehtävä on olla. syntipukkeja. Vain jotkut täyttävät tehtävänsä ja toiset eivät. Ehkä kreikkalaiset valittiin heidän ainutlaatuisesta panoksestaan taiteeseen ja filosofiaan, roomalaiset uraauurtavista palveluistaan laissa ja hallituksessa, britit parlamentaarisen vallan tuomisesta maailmaan ja amerikkalaiset pilotoivat ns. demokratiaa moniarvoisessa kapitalistisessa yhteiskunnassa. Jumala valitsi juutalaiset olemaan "omituisia minulle" uskonnon ja moraalin pioneereiksi; Se oli ja on heidän kansallinen tarkoituksensa. He valizivat hyvän osan eikä sitä oteta hevin pois.
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 523: Juutalaiset torjuvat hirveän ajatuksen, että Jeesus Nasaretilainen olisi messias, ja ovat yhtä mieltä siitä, että oikea messias ei ole vielä tullut. Kautta juutalaisen historian on ollut useita juutalaisia Messias wannabeitä, joita juutalaiset ovat pitäneet valheina, mukaan lukien merkittävimmät Simon bar Kokhba ja Sabbatai Zevi , joiden seuraajat tunnettiin sapattilaisina.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 218: Kertoessaan historiaa Jumalan ja Israelin lasten välisestä suhteesta, Megillat Shir Hashirim on täynnä kuvia Eretz Yisraelin henkeäsalpaavista maisemista, jotka maahanmuuttajia kohtasivat. Metaforat perustuvat sen luonnonilmiöihin, sen kasveihin ja villieläimiin. Viittaukset tehdään gaselliin ja peuroihin, hevoseen, kyyhkysiin, korppeihin, kyyhkysiin, kettuihin, leijoniin ja leopardeihin. Tietyt paikat mainitaan, kuten Ein Gedi, Giladin, Snirin ja Chermonin vuoret sekä esinahka- ja saapaskukkulat, aavikot, purot ja viinitarhat – jotka kaikki ovat olennaisia osia Israelin maisemaa. Lisäksi on mainittu kaksikymmentäkolme kasvityyppiä Shir Hashirimissa, sisältäen erilaisia mausteita, ruusuja, pähkinöitä, omenoita ja klassista "maitoa ja hunajaa", muttei Jaffa-appelsiineja, joista vientituotteista maa on hyvin tunnettu. Lisäksi suurin osa seitsemästä Israelille ainutlaatuisesta lajista mainitaan Shir Hashirimissä. Kommenttimme korostaa joidenkin näiden hedelmien ja Israelin kansan genitaalien välisiä yhtäläisyyksiä.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 240: Vet ir mir fregn: S'taytsh? Vi ken dos zayn? If you ask me, what's the meaning of this? How can it be?
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 265: Vet ir mir fregn: S'taytsh? Vi ken dos zayn? If you ask me, what's the meaning of this? How can it be?
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 291:
    In his manner there is more neatness than strength, and it has been said, more show than service; his blows are in general deficient in force, but given with astonishing quickness, and he is [agreed] to strike oftener, and stop more dexterously, than any other man.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 370: Yksityinen silmä Pirulainen Hiven on myös ainutlaatuinen. Trace-sarjassa on seitsemän kirjaa, ja ne voittivat seitsemän kansallista palkintoa, mikä tekee siitä yhden modernin etsivähistorian arvostetuimmista sarjoista. Mystery ja Detective Monthly kutsuivat kirjoja "hauskimmille koskaan kirjoitetuille mysteereille, patukka ei yhtään."
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 399: I want to show you how to write a novel that doesn't suck (except bucks out of other suckers' pockets). Step by step by step. I don't do this out of a crazy lusting for notoriety, I only in it for the money. Another Day, Another Dollar.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 403: I got my gift from my god, so I hope you did too. Otherwise, dont even bother. Your best bet is a genre novel -- a book that fits into one of the broad general categories such as mystery, suspense, horror, romance, sci-fi, fantasy, historical, paranormal, even soft porn, like my stupid son.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 407: Genre fiction, also known as popular fiction, is a term used in the book-trade for fictional works written with the intent of fitting into a specific literary genre, in order to appeal to striped-ass baboons and fans already familiar with that genre. A number of major literary figures have written genre fiction. John Banville publishes crime novels as Benjamin Black, and both Doris Lessing and Margaret Atwood have written science fiction. Georges Simenon, the creator of the Maigret detective novels, has been described by André Gide as "the most novelistic of novelists in French literature", and the one who has made most money and scored most arse with it. The main genres are crime, fantasy, romance, science fiction and horror—as well as perhaps Western, inspirational and historical fiction.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 446: Oh, and one more assignment. Take a book that you particularly like that's in the genre you want to work in and read it again. And this time, read it like a writer. When does the author spell out the main idea of the story? When does the hero arrive in the book? When the villain? Love interest? Danger and threats? How does the author make it seem real to you? If you want, stick post-it notes at various parts of the book. Think about it.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 454: Almost every movie, almost every story, almost every novel, almost every story of any enduring value is structured this way….in four parts. The same parts in a normal intercourse. (Actually there are five, but the last one is often played down or put in an Epilogue.)
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 466: Tätä on noudatettava, koska se toimii - se on toiminut maailman sivu, samalla konstilla on meidät kaikki nussittu. The structure itself puts tension and action and drama into everything it touches — and that’s what you want your book to do. And that’s what your readers will also want your book to do. Readers have a comfort zone and this structure will put them in it.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 474: As a boy, I remember a movie where Tarzan is asked by Jane to fight against some Nazis who have come to their neck of the jungle. But Tarzan refuses; the F.D. Roosevelt of his time, he’s got nothing against Nazis. But then they bomb Pearl Harbor sorry kidnap Tarzans son, Boy, and Tarzan bestirs himself, sticks a knife in his arse, and says “Now Tarzan fight.” Että jenkkitolvanoille pitääkin ihan kädestä pitäen opettaa tätä paskan lapparointia.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 478: One way is to cast your friends or acquaintances as characters in your book. Another way is to cast the eventual movie while writing your book. In the writing of a novel called “Jericho Day,” in my mind I cast the young Burt Lancaster as the hero, Luke Darling, because I love the look of the square-jawed stubborness of Lancaster and his performing hips.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 482: And remember this: a great hero needs and deserves a great recognizable villain. That is what was wrong with a movie called “Remo Williams: the Adventure Begins,” which was based on my Destroyer book series. In the Bond movies, 007 confronts people who want to nuke London or steal all the gold in Fort Knox etc. etc. My guy, Remo Williams went up against some mope who was selling cheap rifles to the government…and no one gave a damn. Great heroes need great villains; otherwise they just look silly. The AI monster made of garbage in Remo vanha vainooja, now that was something else.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 484: Another side-note. Basically I hate research into facts and history and blah and blah. So you can’t think of character traits? Here are some opposites for you. I can think of dozens more.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 515: There is a hierarchy of character. Minor characters, you let vanish. Usually you bring them alive for a moment by using stereotypes. Stereotypes are not necessarily evil or bad; they are boring characters who are typical members of a group and your readers know the group… Cabbie, cop, waitress, nigger, telephone operator, prostitute, lawyer, doctor, politician, drunken Irishman (What? Are there still some of those?), Italian who talks with his hands. We might not like stereotypes of groups to which we belong but as writers they work. These are place-holding characters; they do their job and disappear into the night. Writers of pulp fiction, say.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 517: Sometimes though they might do a little more. They won’t steal the real action but they set the mood, they add humor, they make the setting more believable. You can do this by making placeholders eccentric or obsessive. I read analysis once of an old flick called Beverly Hills Cop. It featured a clerk in an art gallery. He was effeminate. By itself, that’s not unusual. But he had a Jewish accent, and that was unusual because Jews weren’t generally treated as queens in Hollywood — it teems with them (although today H’wood can say anything it wants about Jews, even Christians. You can tell this was an old movie.) What that character did however in the film was to help make Detroit cop Eddie Murphy, the negro comedian, feel even more alien in L.A. than he otherwise would have.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 519: Heroes have their Achilles heels. The most honest president of the U.S. cheats on the golf course; that is what makes people real. The late Robert Parker’s Spenser character was interesting. He was a yuppie. He ran, he lifted weights, he liked to cook, he liked unimposing little wines with sardonic personalities, he pretended he didn’t care about clothes but somehow always managed to wear the same basic uniform;, he lived with a woman, Susan the insufferable, who could psycho-babble Jay-Z into impotence. But the characterization hook was that Spenser spent his life being a private eye and shooting people, which was totally alien to the character’s nature. That started to round him out and make him real. Without that hard edge, he’d have been just another fan of Barry Manilow.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 531: Yogi Berra oli typerälippalakkinen pesäpallisti jonka luonnetyyppi oli ISFP (introverted sensing feeling perceiving). Se kexi paljon Matti Nykäsmäisiä aforismeja. Unassuming yet passionate athlete. Kuoli samana vuonna kuin Warren mutta 8v vanhempana. Se oli italiaano 2. polven immigrantti jonka äiti ei osannut sanoa "Lawrence". He received the nickname "Yogi" from his friend Jack Maguire, who, after seeing a newsreel about India, said that he resembled a yogi from India whenever he sat around with arms and legs crossed waiting to bat or while looking sad after a losing game. Se oli hörökorvainen pikkumies, muistutti kyllä aika lailla Yodaa kuvissa.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 537: “Ahab, the obsessed, revenge-seeking captain of a whaling ship, sails his vessel and its crew to destruction, in a final confrontation with the great white whale that had crippled him years earlier.”
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 541: Liberals are always writing searing indictments. Warren is no ass-kissing liberal. Or was. For now he is just a carcass for burying beetles, or a heap of bones, or a matchbox full of ash. This is a one-sentence summary of his masterpiece, Temple Dogs:
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 543: “When his sister is murdered at her wedding reception by a pair of New York City mafia goons, Japanese-American yuppie Miles Haverford goes to Japan and brings back to America a group of Yakuza crime family assassins who extract revenge for the young girl’s death.”
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 547: My Destroyer series of 150 books is covered by this single sentence:
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 549: “After his fake execution for a murder he didn’t commit, ex-cop Remo Williams is forced to work for America’s secret crime-fighting agency CURE, while being trained by the world’s greatest assassin, the aged, ageless, cranky, mercenary, mystical Chiun, Master of Sinanju.”
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 556: “While in Japan, Miles meets the Yakuza chieftain, the aging Nagoya, and learns that, by blood, he is truly a member of this crime family. But Nagoya’s assistant and heir, the street warrior Sato, also of mixed blood, tries to drive Miles away because the young American and Sato’s woman, Lady Tomiko, are clearly falling in love. Yet Miles eventually wins over the Yakuza men and Sato is among the group that returns with Miles to New York to slowly, individually, bloodily tear apart the DeSanto Mafia crime family.”
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 560: “In New York, the DeSanto crime family is dead or in jail. Miles’ parents in New York are safe from Mafia reprisal. The Yakuza assassins are ready to return to Japan, but Miles has decided that the life of a buttered-bun Wall Street lawyer is no longer for him. He bids his family goodbye and returns to the Japanese home of Yakuza chieftain Nagoya. It is time for Nagoya to pass on the leadership of the criminal clan and his choice is his faithful assistant, Sato. But Sato declines the ceremonial cup and instead stands beside Miles and calls him ‘Someone whom the gods have sent from across the sea to lead you to tomorrow.’ And then he bows to Miles, the new leader.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 571: Basically, I’m not a big fan of Raymond Chandler's Big Sleep. Well, why pussyfoot around? Actually I think the book is stupid; however, Raymond Chandler is a particular favorite of artsy-fartsy mystery readers and critics and this rather bizarre genre mystery featuring the private eye Philip Marlowe is often ranked as one of the 100 best novels of all time. I just don't see why, I think my Remo Vanha Vainooja is 10x more fascinating.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 573: Pfffft. Personally, I always thought Chandler was too cute by half and, like the author Trevanian for instance, too hell-bent upon showing you just how smart he was by using obscure little literary references, and this particular novel has a more complex plot than the King James version of the Bible. (I'm often just jealous.)
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 592: Scene by scene construction. It’s not one long narrative that never ends. Not usually, not any more. Instead, the story stops, starts again somewhere else, stops, starts again. These scenes are like chapter breaks, except more frequent. This is all copied from movies. How sad.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 594: Dialogue that sounds real. This is not tape-recorded dialogue but an attempt to make speech sound more realistic than it often has been written. Sometimes people say things that aren’t exactly to the point; nothing wrong with that as long as it’s interesting and/or entertaining and can move the story forward. Cases in point: the overrated Quentin Tarantino in films like “Pulp Fiction.” One of the best at it was novelist George Higgins. Elmore Leonard is excellent; also Larry Block.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 596: Status objects. An essay by Tom Wolfe (Bonfire of the Vanities) put this in my head some years ago. A certain kind of person wants to wear shirts that have little alligators on them and another totally different type of person perhaps wants to have a statue of a black jockey on his lawn…or a pink flamingo. My late loving mother, a paragon of taste, once moved into our guest house and put painted plywood cutouts of the backviews of two people, bending over as if planting something in the yard. Naturally, butt cracks were visible because they were the whole point of this architectural and horticultural display. Since my house then was a mansion and a national historic site, I suggested that my mother take her plywood cutouts off the front lawn and put them in her backyard where nobody could see her butt. (I am a long time out of Alabama.)
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 601: Finally, a large percentage of novels today are written in restricted third person viewpoint. In other words, in each individual scene, the author works through only one person’s head. Anybody else in the scene, except the major player at that moment, is made to live by his actions and his words, but not by you — as author — getting into his head and telling us what he’s thinking. (Obviously, by the way, private eye novels are in some way illustrative of this rule because most PI’s are written first person since it’s impossible to get into another character’s thoughts and feelings except by showing him cavorting on your literary stage.)
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 610: Dialogue is the easiest, fastest and best way to involve your readers with your subject, your story, your characters, your writing. The fanciest long description of the snow storm slowly cresting the nearby mountain may indeed be beautiful writing but meh, who cares? My advice: leave out the nature shit and get back to the real world; give us this instead:
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 617: A guy named Leonard Bishop has a rule: keep the dialogue short. Four sentences is a speech. More than that, break it up. Let something happen. Let the person sip a drink or light a cigarette, scratch his butt or sneeze, anything. Let the speaker be responded to or questioned by another character. Let’s face it; nobody gets a a chance to speak for five sentences in a row without being interrupted, unless he or she is one of our neighbors in the East. Personally I find even Quentin Tarantino tedious.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 621: See that guy up there waiting in the checkout line near the cash register? Yes, of course he’s reading. He’s always reading. He’s Stephen King — and yes, to this day, he reads every check he gets. And if you would emulate him, then start imitating him.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 625: The Destroyer Series played a huge role in getting me interested in economics, geography, politics, history, and even in Jewish Mysticism and the paranormal! Richard Sapir (+1987) after all was a Jew. The Body, which was made into a movie in 2001, is about a Jewish archaeologist who finds a skeleton underneath an Arab shopkeeper's basement that might be the body of Jesus and the American Jesuit priest who is sent by the Vatican to investigate.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 636: I was going to write about research but I hate research, research sucks. So maybe this can be about theme because “big books” frequently have a theme, although it’s not absolutely necessary. See, themes are about ideas and some writers, very skillful and very successful, have never had an idea in their lives. Still and all, books and stories are made better when they have a strong theme, some underlying message that can resonate with your readers.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 638: For instance, the overrated “Catcher in the Rye’s” theme is that life sucks. Okay, if you say so. Include me out. The vastly better “This is Graceanne’s Book” has the opposite theme — that you can win; no matter the odds, you can do it. I like that one better. It is pure bullshit, but then so am I. Or was.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 640: Theme isn’t something you paste on after you write the first draft. Now, potboilers in general don’t have much thematic content because they doesn’t need to go far beyond: Bang Bang and the good guys in the white hats win. Theme is a more ever-present feeling that permeates the book you’re working on. Do you think when Ayn Rand wrote The Fountainhead or Atlas Shrugged, she first wrote the stories and then asked herself, “Now whatever could this be about? Selfishness?” But then, she was more political than most and, as I said, many books don’t have any discernible theme, except, buy it please and make me rich. That's my theme anyway.
    xxx/ellauri304.html on line 645: Did you ever hear of a guy with plumber’s block? Electrician’s block? Did a mechanic ever have mechanic’s block? No, no, and no. The reason is that none of them get paid if they don’t show up to work, so block isn’t really a viable option like flu. However for writers, it often is, but then, they don't get paid. Read Trollope’s autobiography. He worked according to schedule and if he finished a novel, but still had fifteen minutes left in his usual writing day, he would take a fresh piece of paper, write “Chapter One” and get started immediately. Time’s a-wasting, children, said Trollope and went out to fornicate some neighborhood trollops. It pays to be mediocre.
    xxx/ellauri305.html on line 44: Pete Mencken defended Dreiser despite freely admitting his faults, stating forthrightly that Dreiser often wrote badly and was a gullible man. Dreiser oli Chicagon kirjallisuusliikkeen veteraani ja antisemiitti.
    xxx/ellauri305.html on line 113: Lupiinit on aivan vitun röyhkeitä. Huomaa että ne on Kaliforniasta kotoisin. Vaikka niitä kiskoo maasta päivittäin niin 4 päivän poissaolon jälkeen löytyy kymmeniä baseball-lippispäisiä, vankkavartisia, karvaisia, ilkeästi virnuilevia nahisevia pöyhöjä.
    xxx/ellauri305.html on line 257: Kaikki muslimit ovat Allahin asialla. Ariel pääsi Karmela Belinkin housuihin vasta vuoden yritettyään, kapisella vaahtomuovipatjalla pani nuohoten sitä talon kellarissa Karmelan huokuessa hänen korvaansa. Itikat suosivat puuskuttavia. Vuonna 1984 Bélinki esitti Helsingin yliopistossa väitöskirjaksi englanninkielisen tutkimuksen naisasialiikkeen historiasta. Tutkimus sai painoluvan, mutta väitöstilaisuudessa molemmat vastaväittäjät ehdottivat sen hylkäämistä. Tapausta puitiin myöhemmin muun muassa väittelijän oikeusturvan kannalta. Bélinki väitteli myöhemmin tanskalaisessa Knightsbridgen yliopistossa. Knightsbridgen yliopiston tutkintoja ei tunnusteta edes Tanskassa. Tanskan korkeakoulu- ja tiedeministeriö kielsi Knightsbridgeltä "university"-nimikkeen käytön vuonna 2010. Bélinki toimi 1980-luvun alussa Helsingin kaupunginvaltuustossa aluksi rannikkoruozalaisten kääpiöpuolueen ryhmässä, mutta siirtyi 1980 kesken kauden kokoomuksen valtuustoryhmään. Julkaisuja: Shylock i Finland: judarna och Finlands litteratur 1900-1970. Åbo Akademi 2000. Karmela on Pikin ikätoveri, varmaan jo puuskuttaakin ja pilkkii sohvalla.
    xxx/ellauri305.html on line 262: Lisäksi he istuvat erillään miehistä, joko erillisen kankaan takana hassut tupeet päässä synagogan takaosassa tai naisten parvekkeella.
    xxx/ellauri305.html on line 297: 613 käskyä ovat Toorassa, Mooseksen viidessä kirjassa annetut määräykset eli mitsvat (hepr. ‏מצוות‎, mitsvot), joita noudattaen juutalaisten tulee elää. Käskyjen määräksi on vakiintunut 613, sillä se on sanan Torah lukuarvo lisättynä sukuelinten lukumäärällä. Käskyluettelo ei ole yksiselitteinen, mutta arvovaltaisimpana pidetään rabbi Maimonidesin kokoamaa listaa Mishneh Torahissa (1170–1180 jaa.). Käskyistä positiivisia on 248, ja kieltoja on 365. Suuri osa käskyistä on vanhentuneita, kuten jo tuhotussa temppelissä suoritettavan rituaaliköyrimisen ohjeet, ja jotkin vain muinaista Israelia koskevat ohjeet. Nykyisin noudatettavissa olevia käskyistä arvioidaan olevan alle 300.
    xxx/ellauri305.html on line 924: Lev. 23:24 - Levätä Rosh Hashanahissa
    xxx/ellauri305.html on line 926: Lev. 23:25 – Älä tee kiellettyä työtä Rosh Hashanahissa
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 173:
    Esther juhannuställingissä, naama hiukan parempaan muotoon vuoltuna. Häpykarvoitus on tuuhistunut. Leo hässii Aprilia etunojasta melkein yhtä etevästi kuin Donatello. - H-how am I doing? -You are doing great Leo! Now fill me up with your cum. Hei mitä nyt Leo yritäzä käyttää mua hyväx? Stop! Stop! Stop!

    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 197: Conpositum ius fasque animo sanctosque recessus Nim. sekoitus oikeasta ja vanhurskaasta mielestä ja pyhis
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 212: alueen eteläpäässä, joka tunnetaan nykyään Onondaga-järvenä historiallisen heimon
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 223: Accusé de traîtrise par certains historiens canadiens-français en raison de ses nombreux changements d'allégeance, il est l'un des personnages les plus colorés et controversés de l’histoire de la Nouvelle-France.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 253: Memorial Tompkins Streetin ja Milton Avenuen kulmassa tämän historian muistoksi.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 381: Empatian puute – se, että et pysty osoittamaan huolta ja välittämistä lähisuhteistasi, kun he tarvitsevat sinua, vahingoittaa uskomattoman paljon tulevia suhteitasi.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 421: Skyytit jaetaan neljään pääryhmään: Mustanmeren skyytit; sarmaatit, jotka tulivat Kaspianmeren pohjoisrannikolta sekä Donin ja Volgan alueelta; Keski-Aasian aavikkoarojen skyytit (massagetae); sekä itäisen Keski-Aasian skyytit (sakā). Kaikkia ryhmiä yhdisti yhteinen soturinomadinen identiteetti, hallintotapa sekä pukeutumistyyli. Muodikkaasti skyyttisotureista oli 1/5 naisia. Nykyisin arvellaankin, että antiikin kreikkalaisten amatsonitarinat mahdollisesti pohjautuivat juuri skyyttinaissotureihin. Skyytit tunnetaan hautakummuistaan eli kurgaaneista. Skyyttien asutuxia ja hautakumpuja (kurgaaneja ) on Dneprin alajuoksun lähistöllä. Skyytit olivatkin siis ukrainalaisia? Haha. Kurgaanihypoteesin mukaan Ukraina on koko indoeurooppalaisen kielikunnan alkupesä. Gimbutas esitteli kurgaanikulttuurin ensimmäisen kerran vuonna 1956. Marija Gimbutas (liett. Marija Gimbutienė, 23. tammikuuta 1921 Vilna, Liettua – 2. helmikuuta 1994 Los Angeles, Yhdysvallat) oli liettualais-yhdysvaltalainen arkeologi. Hiän myös sijoitti kulttuurin Venäjän ja Ukrainan aroille. Haha LOL. Hiänen näkemystensä vastaanotto oli lievästi sanottuna ristiriitainen. Vitut ne oli ainakaan mitään kelttejä. Olisitko keltti ja ojentaisit suolaa.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 423: Sotahommat alkoi mennä perseelleen skyyteiltä 200-luvulla eaa. Hävittyään Jaksartesjoella Aleksanteri Suurelle skyyttien voittokulku katkesi. 100-luvun lopulla eaa. Mithridates VI löi skyytit, jotka olivat hyökänneet kreikkalaisten siirtokuntien kimppuun. Skyytit hävisivät myös roomalaisille 63 jaa. Skyytit katosivat historiasta 300-luvulla, kun he joutuivat vielä hunnienkin lyömiksi ja sulautuivat gootteihin.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 427: Kun Cassiodorus kirjoitti goottien historian noin vuonna 550, hän antoi niiden nimille uuden ulottuvuuden, jota niillä ei ennen ollut. Ostrogootit hän tulkitsi itägooteiksi ja vesi-nimestä tuli visigootit eli länsigootit. Koska ostrogootit asustivat tuolloin Italiassa ja visigootit lännempänä Iberian niemimaalla, nimet jäivät käyttöön. Nykyisin yritetään kuitenkin välttää vääriksi tulkittuja nimiä länsigootit ja itägootit. Syy on takuulla geopoliittinen: länsiliitto pyrki poistamaan sanan "länsi" assosiaation pahoixi leimattuihin gootteihin. Parempi puhua vain "hyvis" gooteista. Vuonna 375 hunnit hyökkäsivät greuthungien kuningaskuntaan ja valloittivat sen. Kuningas Ermanarik teki epätoivoissaan itsemurhan, kun ei pystynyt vastustamaan valloittajia. Hunnit pakottivat myös tervingit pakenemaan asuinalueiltaan ja etsimään turvaa Tonavan eteläpuolelta, Rooman valtakunnan rajojen sisältä. Antiikin kirjoittajat mainitsevat juuri hunnivalloituksen syynä siihen, että gootit 370-luvulla alkoivat pyrkiä Rooman alueelle, mutta eräiden nykytutkijoiden mukaan se ei välttämättä ollut ainoa tai edes tärkein syy. Vaihtoehtoisina selityksinä on mainittu väestönkasvu, ilmastonmuutoxesta alkanut elinolojen heikentyminen goottien asuinalueilla ja siitä seurannut eri maturyhmien keskinäinen valtataistelu.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 474: Seuraavana päivänä, kun suuri osa aamusta oli kulunut, kuninkaalliset palvelijat epäilivät sairastamista ja murtautuivat suuren kohun jälkeen ovet sisään. Sieltä he löysivät Attilan kuoleman verenvuodon seurauksena, ilman haavoja, ja tytön, jonka kasvot alaspäin itkivät verhonsa alla. Sitten, kuten tuolle rodulle on tapana, repäisivät hiuksensa pois päästään ja tekivät heidän kasvonsa kauhistuksiksi syvin haavoin, jotta kuuluisaa soturia voitaisiin surettaa, ei naisellisen itkujen ja kyynelten, vaan ihmisten veren kautta. Lisäksi Attilan kuoleman yhteydessä tapahtui ihmeellinen asia. Sillä unessa joku jumala seisoi itä-Rooman keisarin Marcianuxen rinnalla, kun tämä oli huolestunut raivokkaasta vihollisestaan, ja näytti hänelle Attilan jousen, joka oli murtunut samana yönä, ikään kuin vihjatakseen hunnirodun olleen velkaa paljon tuolle aseelle. Tämän kertomuksen historioitsija Priscus sanoo hyväksyvänsä totuudenmukaisexi ilman todisteita. Sillä Attilan pidettiin niin kauheana suurille valtakunnille, että kilpailijoiden jumalat ilmoittivat hänen kuolemastaan ​​kilpaileville hallitsijoille erityisenä siunauksena.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 479: Hunnit, kuningas Attila, joka syntyi isästään Mundiuchista, rohkeimpien heimojen herra, skythien ja saksalaisten valtakuntien – ennen tuntemattomien valtojen – ainoa omistaja, valloitti kaupunkeja ja kauhistutti roomalaisen maailman kumpaakin valtakuntaa, ja heidän rukouksistaan ​​rauhoittuneena jätti tekemättä loput ryöstöstä. Ja kun hän oli saavuttanut kaiken tämän onnen suosiolla, hän kaatui, ei vihollisen haavan eikä ystävien petoksen takia, vaan kansansa keskellä rauhassa, iloisena ilostaan ​​ja ilman kivun tunnetta. Tämmöinen laaditaan Putinistakin takuulla.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 497: Painu jalkoihisi! Poika oli juosta kipittänyt halki pimeän pellon tupaan, mielessä tunne, että isä oli joskus kummallinen, käsittämätön.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 578: Täytyypä kazoa mitä Mätien tomskujen tampiot tästä sanovat! Top critics: Cruise’s toothy heroics are ill-suited to moral complexity, but he is elevated by a stellar supporting cast... A summer genre movie for grown-ups. Too-long Grisham thriller is full of adult themes. Höh, montako panoa? Näytetäänkö muka kuinka se menee sinne? (Ilmeisesti noin 2, ei näytetä.) The Firm amusingly satirizes the New Traditionalist aspirations of today's young urban elite -- not so much the lifestyle itself as the illusion of utter security it represents. Alas, Tom Cruise is Tom Cruise, playing yet another variation of his screen image. A first-class thriller and thought-provoking morality play. Is this a thriller? You've never scene (sic) a 'suspense film' drag its heels so deplorably. Moderately entertaining... and a big step up from the book. No, the book moved at turbo speed. At two and a half hours, the movie crawls. Two-and-a-half hour movies -- jeez, there ought to be a law.

    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 580: Nimetön: I find this movie boring and predictable the acting was poorly done which is hard for me because of the great cast the writing was awful and at times the movie went flat the chase scene at the end was comical and silly the whole movie was a mess. To put it simply, the film completely ruined the book. And that wasn't easy. This is such a bad film. It is an hour and a half too long, and the beginning and middle are insanely dull. The production value and score do not stand up to the test of time at all. This is an example of all of the worst things about the 90's, which might be one of the worst decades for filmmaking. Es wird einfach viel zu viel geredet, als man schon längstens in die Tat umgesetzt hätte. Fazit: Lieber eine kürzere Geschichte dafür intensiver erzählen und Spannung aufbauen!

    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 581: Wetback: Nunca pude comprender por qué The Firm se convirtió en arrollador best seller. El libro era un hormiguero de argumentos conflictivos, que sólo tenían en común su implausibilidad. Era preciso creer que un bufete de abogados en Memphis ocultaba las operaciones criminales de la Mafia, con 43 leguleyos obligados a callar, porque huir les costaba la vida. Por si eso fuera poco, había que aceptar un héroe capaz de sacrificarse por sacar de la cárcel a su hermano convicto, cuya existencia negaba como oveja negra y a quien no veía desde tiempo inmemorial. Lo increíble empataba con lo inconcebible, en rollos paralelos. El libro fue rechazado por editoriales hasta que Paramount le vio potencial cinematográfico e instigó su publicación. Tähti on tietysti Tom Cruise, joka juoksee kuin vinttikoira ja tekee temppuja kuin mountebank. Hän päätyy erittäin vakuuttavasti ahneuteen ja ahneuteen. Ei ole helppoa ylläpitää radikaalin tuskan ilmaisua kahden ja puolen tunnin ajan.
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 633: Earthissa) ja tunnen kaipauksen, aivan kuin olisin jättänyt jotain taakseni. 😥 Rakastan kulttuuria, aksentteja, linnoja...
    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 641: ARTHUR: I am King Arthur and these are the Knights of the Round Table. Whose castle is this?

    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 642: MAN: This is the castle of of my master, Guy de Loimbard

    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 643: ARTHUR: Please go and tell your master that we have been charged by God with a sacred quest, and if he will give us food and shelter for this night he can join us in our quest for the Holy Grail

    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 657: MAN: I'm French. Why do think I have this outrageous accent, you silly king

    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 663: He puts hands to his ears and blows a raspberry

    xxx/ellauri306.html on line 670: ARTHUR: Now this is your last chance. I've been more than reasonab...

    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 49: Nuoret ahistuvat luullessaan että kestä tahansa voi tulla mitä tahansa. Ei voi sanoo identiteettitutkija. Kyllä voi, jämentävät motivoivat puhujat. Magnan ylioppilaasta Hyvinkäältä voi sukeutua satumaisesti ansaizeva filosofikuningas.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 161: Jokaisella ihmissielulla on enemmän merkitystä ja arvoa kuin koko historialla.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 197: Keräämme tietoja myös käyttäessäsi verkkosivustoamme tai palveluitamme, mukaan lukien toiminnot, kuten kirjautuminen tilillesi ja/tai tilisi käyttö. Sisältö (eli kaikki tiedot, jotka luot, lataat, julkaiset, lähetät tai jaat verkkosivustomme kautta) voidaan välittää järjestelmiemme kautta ja tallentaa niihin. Näitä tietoja ovat selaushistoriasi verkkosivustolla, kirjanmerkkeihin merkityt lainaukset, tekemäsi kommentit, tietyillä sivuilla käytetty aika, verkkosivuston Uniform Resource Locator ("URL") verkkosivustolta, jolla vierailit ennen tälle verkkosivustolle tuloa, minkä URL-osoitteen vieraile seuraavaksi (eli jos seurasit linkkiä johonkin suosittelemistamme palveluntarjoajista tai toimittajista), laitetyyppi, käyttämäsi selain, Internet-palveluntarjoaja, vierailun päivämäärä/aikatiedot, käyttöjärjestelmä ja muut käyttötiedot.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 201: Kun vierailet verkkosivustollamme, näkemäsi mainos voidaan räätälöidä aiemman Internet-käyttäytymisesi perusteella. Emme käsittele henkilötietojasi itse, mutta annamme kolmansille osapuolille pääsyn henkilötietoihisi verkkosivustomme kautta. Katso asianomaisten kolmansien osapuolten tietosuojakäytännöt tässä asiakirjassa.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 205: AddThis (Addthis Inc.) - Tietosuojakäytäntö
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 356: Lurmel-kadun hostellissa järjestettiin Pyhän Jumalansynnyttäjän esirukouskirkko ja psalmistikurssit sekä talvesta 1936-1937 lähetyssaarnaajien kursseja. 27. syyskuuta 1935 nunna Marian aloitteesta perustettiin hyväntekeväisyys-, kulttuuri- ja koulutusyhdistys "Ortodoksinen asia", johon kuuluivat Nikolai Berdjajev, Sergei Bulgakov, Georgi Fedotov, ja Konstantin Mochulsky. Konsta oli Doston virallinen elämäkerturi. Georgy Petrovich Fedotov oli venäläinen uskonnollinen filosofi, historioitsija, esseisti, monien ortodoksista kulttuuria koskevien kirjojen kirjoittaja, jota jotkut pitävät venäläisen "teologisen kulturologian" perustajana, whatever that may be. Sergei Nikolajevitš Bulgakov oli venäläinen ortodoksinen teologi, pappi, filosofi ja taloustieteilijä. Ortodoksinen kirjailija ja tutkija David Bentley Hart on sanonut, että Bulgakov oli "1900-luvun suurin systemaattinen teologi". Sergei oli myös iso takinkääntäjä idealismista marxismiin ja takaisin. Isä Sergeillä ja äiti Marialla ei ollut yhteisiä jälkeläisiä vaikka asioivat usein pussauskopissa.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 625: Janet Evanovich on myydyin kirjailija ja on ansainnut kymmeniä palkittuja romaaneja. Hän aloitti romanttisten romaanien kirjoittamisen 1980-luvulla, ja lopulta hän vaihtoi genrejä keskittyäkseen enemmän lukemisen jännittävään puoleen. Evanocih nousi tähteen ja kuuluisuuteen Stephanie Plum -franchisellaan.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 677: Christopher Little "Christopher Little Literary Agency" on Lontoossa sijaitseva kirjallisuusagenttien yritys. Virasto on johtanut Harry Potter -kirjailijaa JK Rowlingia vuosina 1996–2011. Häntä on kuvattu "kaikkien aikojen onnekkaimmaksi agentiksi", joka oli puolet "kirjallisuuden historian kaupallisesti menestyneimmistä suhteista".
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 721:

    Dan grew up on the campus of Phillips Exeter Academy, where his father,
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 723: his retirement in 1997. His mother, Constance (née Gerhard), trained as a church
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 725: described his religious evolution in a 2009 interview:


    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 739: He played squash, sang in the Amherst Glee Club, and was a writing student of visiting novelist Alan Lelchuk (n.h.). [Merkittäviä kriittisiä tutkimuksia Lelchukista ovat olleet Philip Roth Esquiressa, Wilfrid Sheed Book -of-the-Month Club Newsissa, Benjamin DeMott The Atlanticissa, Mordechai Richler Chicago Tribunessa ja Steven Birkets The New Republicissa. Nämä olivat varmaan kaikki juutalaisia, kuten Lechuk izekin. American Mischief "Yksikään kirjailija ei ole kirjoittanut niin tietäen ja kaunopuheisesti lihallisen intohimon seurauksista Massachusettsissa Scarlet Letterin jälkeen." Philip Roth, Esquire. On Home Ground "On Home Ground herättää nuorille lukijoilleen ajankohtaisia ​​kysymyksiä ja tekee sen niin taitavasti. Se saavuttaa niin paljon menestystä kuin baseball-harjoitus ja nostalgia." Juutalaisomisteinen The New York Times Book Review. Lelchuk kirjoittaa valtavan ilolla kuvista, sanoista ja järkähtämättömästä kuolevaisesta erityisyydestä. Naisille, jotka etsivät vastauksia, hän tarjoaa juutalaisia olankohautuxia, epäselvyyttä, joka on omituisen tyydyttävää." Catherine Bateson (juutalaisen Margaret Meadin juutalainen tytärvainaa).] Brown spent the 1985 school year abroad in Seville, Spain, where he was enrolled in an art history course at the University of Seville. Brown graduated from Amherst in 1986.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 740: Danilla oli surkea muusikonura länsirannikolla jota nöyrä, sittemmin eroprosessissa kusetettu vaimo Blythe koitti turhaan buustata. Brown and his wife Blythe moved to Rye, New Hampshire in 1993, samana vuonna jolloin ize sain karkoituxen Kouvolaan. Brown became an English teacher at his alma mater Phillips Exeter, and gave Spanish classes to 6th, 7th, and 8th graders at Lincoln Akerman School, a small school for K–8th grade with about 250 students, in Hampton Falls. Aikamoinen mahalasku tuli Danille(kin). While on vacation in Tahiti in 1993, Brown read Sidney Sheldon's (n.h.) novel The Doomsday Conspiracy, and was inspired to become a writer of thrillers. He started work on Digital Fortress, setting much of it in Seville, where he had studied in 1985. He also co-wrote a humor book with his wife, 187 Men to Avoid: A Survival Guide for the Romantically Frustrated Woman, under the pseudonym "Danielle Brown". Brown's first three novels had little success, with fewer than 10,000 copies in each of their first printings. His fourth novel, The Da Vinci Code, became a bestseller, going to the top of the New York Times Best Seller list during its first week of release in 2003. It is one of the most popular books of all time, with 81 million copies sold worldwide as of 2009. Its success has helped push sales of Brown's earlier flops. Brown's prose style has been criticized as clumsy, to say the least. The Da Vinci Code committed style and word choice blunders in almost every paragraph. Recurring elements that Brown prefers to incorporate into his novels include a simple hero pulled out of their familiar setting and thrust into a new one with which they are unfamiliar, an attractive female sidekick/love interest, foreign travel, imminent danger from a pursuing villain, antagonists who have a disability or genetic disorder, and a 24-hour time frame in which the story takes place.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 741: Brown's work is heavily influenced by academic Joseph Campbell, who wrote extensively on mythology and religion and was highly influential in the field of screenwriting. Brown also states he based the character of Robert Langdon on Campbell. Vizi tästä akateemisesta Joosepista taitaa ollakin jo paasaus! Brown does his writing in his loft. He told fans that he uses inversion therapy (ei tarkoita housut pois homopatiaa vaan roikkumista pää alaspäin kuin apina) to help with writer's block. He uses gravity boots and says, "hanging upside down seems to help me solve plot challenges by shifting my entire perspective". Dan on myös hanakka plagioimaan muiden yhtä onnettomia kirjoja.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 743: Benjy DeMott -vainaa "saw as three pervasive social myths: the assumption, held by many Americans, that we live in a classless society; the promise, held out by movies and television, that individual friendships between blacks and whites can vanquish racism all by themselves; and the images of women, ubiquitous in popular culture, that render them almost indistinguishable from men." He opined that movements of the lower classes have a tendency to 'go awry.' Benjamin Haile DeMott was born on June 2, 1924, in Rockville Centre, N.Y.; his father was a carpenter, his mother a faith healer. He joined the Amherst faculty in 1951 and earned a Ph.D. in English literature from Harvard two years later. He observed that a tenet of national faith in America had been that "goodness equals laughter, that humour can banish crisis, that if you pack up your troubles and smile, horror will take to the caves". Critical response to Mr. DeMott's work was divided. His detractors saw his pop-culture references as forced efforts to look au courant.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 787: Kun David saa ylennyxen nykykielten laitoxen esimiehexi, alkaa heidän suhteensa mennä huonosti. RÖLÖS RÖMÖS! koodasi David Susanille suu messingillä. Susan näytti siltä kuin olisi syönyt kyrptoniittia. Susanin päässä kihisi.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 821: Tiikerikirjailija Dan Brownin epäonnistunut avioliitto on kasvanut suureksi saippuaoopperaksi paitsi Yhdysvalloissa, myös Alankomaissa. Heinäkuussa ilmoitettiin, että taidehistorioitsija Blythe Brown haluaa haastaa kaksitoista vuotta nuoremman entisen aviomiehensä oikeuteen, koska tämä olisi pitänyt useita rakastajatareja avio-omaisuudella vuosia, mukaan lukien erittäin masuratsastuskykyisen Judith Pietersen Frieslandista.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 828: Taidehistorioizija Blythe Brown haastoi exänsä oikeuteen, koska heidän avio-omaisuutensa ansiosta hän oli pitänyt useita rakastajattaria vuosia, mukaan lukien friisiläinen ratsastaja Judith Pietersen. Oikeudenkäynnissä on vaakalaudalla kaksi friisihevosta: LimiTed Edition ja DaVinci, joista ori LimiTed Edition edustaa vähintään 300 000 euron arvoa. Pierezen on voittanut vuosia suuria omaisuuxia razastamalla Danin masulla. Judithin hallussapitoon ja omistukseen liittyy paljon epävarmuutta.
    xxx/ellauri307.html on line 945: Elisabeth Badinter on ranskalainen filosofi, kirjailija ja historioitsija. Badinter tunnetaan parhaiten filosofisista tutkielmistaan feminismistä ja naisten roolista yhteiskunnassa. Marianna-uutislehtikyselyssä vuonna 2010 hänet nimettiin "Ranskan vaikutusvaltaisimmaksi intellektuelliksi".
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 34: MEREN pohjasta saadut fos--siilit osoittavat, että sata miljoonaa vuotta sitten hummeri näytti aivan samanlaiselta kuin nykyäänkin yhtä hurjalta kuin rohkean pilapiirtäjän mielikuvi-tuksellinen luomus. Kitiinipanssaris-saan, ohuine raajoineen ja uhkaavan näköisine saksineen hummeri, latina-laiselta nimeltään Homarus, tuo mie-leen (ainakin näin amerikkalaiselle) jättiläiskokoisen torakan, jolla on eturaajoina kaksi putkipihtiä. :D Mutta eriskummallisen ulkonäkönsä ansios-ta hummeri on säilynyt hengissä ko-konaisia maailmankausia vihamieli-sessä vedenalaisessa ympäristössään ja samalla se on säilyttänyt ainoalaa-tuisen omaperäisyytensä ruman, kauhistuttavan, omituisen olemuk-sensa.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 36: Ensinnäkin hummerin elimet ovat nurinkurisessa järjestyksessä. Perse on pään paikalla ja pää pyrstössä kuten Melvillen ja Hawthornen junassa. No ei oikeasti, läppä läppä. Lisää yxityiskohtia voit lukea v. 1967 syyskuun Kalutuista Paloista Rauhixen hyyskässä. Mutta kylläpä se pyrstö maistuu silti hyvältä! Ennen kalpeanaamojen tuloa inkkarien rannat kuhisivat näitä äyriäisiä. Nyt rannat kuhisevat valkonaamoja ja äyriäiset ovat vaarantuneita. Punanahat on sukupuuttoon tapettu niiltä rannoilta jo aikapäiviä. Hummeripojan kandeisi käyttää sosiaalisen median suodattimia. Niistä saa poskiin punaväriä ilman sitä epämukavaa keittovaihetta.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 207: Suuri narratiivi (myös meta-narrative ja grand récit ; ranskaksi : métarécit tai grand récit) on kertomus historiallisen merkityksen, kokemuksen tai tiedon kertomuksista, joka tarjoaa luokkayhteiskunnalle legitimiteetin (vielä toteutumattoman) kapitalismin pääidean odotetun valmistumisen kautta. End of history, lännen murskavoitto yms.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 228: jättää viraston ponnistelemaan välttääkseen Yhdysvaltain historian suurimman
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 302:

    Firefly franchisen River Tam

    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 329: River Tam hahmon luonne ja hänen roolinsa Firefly franchising-sarjassa ovat keränneet sekä kiitosta että kritiikkiä eri arvioijilta. Jotkut ovat hyvässä mielessä vertailleet hahmon arvaamatonta käyttäytymistä autismiin. Tohtori Karin Beeler Northern British Columbian yliopistosta vertasi ja vertasi Riveriä Buffy Summersiin, Buffy the Vampire Slayer -sarjan päähenkilöön (jonka on myös luonut Joss Whedon), kirjassaan Näkijöitä, noitia ja psykoja ruudussa: Anista penaaliin eli analyysi naisten visionäärihahmoista viimeaikaisissa televisio- ja elokuvissa. Beeler nimesi hahmon anti-sankaritarksi verrattuna em. Buffy Summersin sankarillisempaan rooliin. Elokuvakriitikko ja kauhukirjailija Michael Marano myös vertasi hahmoa Buffyyn. Hän mainitsi kahden hahmon taistelutahdon yhtäläisyyksiä ja kuvasi Riveriä Joss Whedonin vahvojen naishahmojen huipennuxexi. Juu tästä Jössistä on jo paasaus albumissa 133.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 331: River Tam oli tohtori Simon Tamin teini-ikäinen sisar. Molemmat turvautuivat Malcolm Reynoldsin Firefly - luokan kuljetusalukseen, joka tunnetaan nimellä Serenity. Häntä pidetään ihmelapsena, älykkäänä yli 10-vuotiaana ja urheilullisesti lahjakkaana. Tohtori Mathiasin intensiivisen kokeilun jälkeen parlamentin – Alliancen hallitsevan elimen – toimesta River muutettiin osittain henkisesti epävakaaksi psyykkiseksi aseeksi, joka oli tarkoitettu salaiseen valtion käyttöön. Hänen veljensä Simon pelasti hänet kalliilla kustannuksilla, mutta useat Alliancen agentit, pääasiassa Lawrence Dobson, kaksi sinikäsineistä miestä, seurasivat häntä hellittämättä. McGinnis, palkkionmetsästäjä Jubal Early ja lopuksi Operative. Lähes kaikki juoksuaikansa hän vietti Serenityn miehistön kanssa, josta tuli hänen suurperheensä.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 336:
    Milu Tam Tam Tam Milutaalialei. River Tamilta housut pois, ja sitten ukrainalaista miehistön jäsentä sisään ulos väkipakolla! Lopuxi juoxujalkaa joelle alapesulle.

    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 349: hisdeity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/mileva_maric.jpg" />
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 352: "It was one of the great ironies of his career that the pacifist Einstein, through this action, should have helped initiate the era of nuclear weapons to whose use he was completely opposed." Haista paska kappalainen hyvin tiesi wiixiwallu mitä oli tekemässä, vitun luikero.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 354: "The establishment of Israel is an event which actively engages the conscience of this generation....It is, therefore, a bitter paradox to find that a State which was destined to be a shelter for a martyred people is itself a Nazi State." Tämä puhe jäi Pertiltä pitämässä Israelissa kun maha-aortta halkesi.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 355: Dr. Thomas Harvey stole Einstein’s brain, planning to study it to try to determine whether he was a genius. Harvey measured and photographed the brain, and commissioned a painting of it from an artist who had done portraits of his children's brains. He kept it in a jar in a beer cooler in his basement.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 357: Einstein had three children. The oldest was a daughter named Lieserl. She was unknown to the world at large until a trove of early letters between Einstein and his first wife Mileva were discovered in 1986. These mentioned a daughter, born in around 1902 before Einstein and Mileva married. The fate of the child is unknown, and it is likely she was given over to someone else to raise. She disappears from history at that point, and she probably died very young. Einstein never mentioned her to anyone and does not appear to have ever laid eyes on her. He just got laid by Milena.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 359: The second was a son named Hans Albert (called “Albert” by his parents), who attained a doctorate in engineering and became a university professor, homeless, and an acknowledged expert on hydraulics. He was obviously quite intelligent, although not quite at changing-the-entire-precepts-of-physics level.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 361: The third was another son, Eduard (called “Tete” by his parents), who showed promise and an interest in medicine. He developed schizophrenia at age 21 and spent the rest of his life in and out of mental institutions.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 386: Kristinuskon historiassa ensimmäiset seitsemän ekumeenista kirkolliskokousta sisältävät seuraavat: Nikean ensimmäinen kirkolliskokous vuonna 325, ensimmäinen Konstantinopolin kirkolliskokous vuonna 381, Efesoksen kirkolliskokous vuonna 431, Kalkedonin kirkolliskokous vuonna 451, Konstantinopolin toinen kirkolliskokous. vuonna 553, Konstantinopolin kolmas kirkolliskokous 680–681 ja lopuksi Nikean toinen kirkolliskokous vuonna 787. Kaikki seitsemän kirkolliskokousta kutsuttiin koolle nykypäivän Turkissa.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 418: Eveen tekee vaikutuxen Roarken takatukka, kiiltelevä Rolex, yxityinen suihkari ja pössyttely. Rourken rööki haisi houkuttelevalta. Winstonia röyhyttävät Laura Bush, Princess Caroline, ja Nora Roberts. Winston tastes GOOD like a cigarette should! USA 2050 on dystopia, jossa tupakointi, aseenkanto ja hississä pystynainti on kielletty. Kahvi on korviketta koska Amazon on poltettu.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 431: Jättimäiset porsliinilautaset saapuvat sihisevine pihveineen ja ohuine kullankeltaisine ranuineen. Roarke kohautti aistikkaita harteitaan. Adjektiivit, Nora, muistatko mitä Kurko sanoi niistä? Varo niitä!
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 433: Mitä pidät ruuasta? Tämo hyvvee! Kuten sanoin sellainen mä olen! en kohtele kaltoin naarasapinoita, vain nautoja ja vihamiehiä. Pyllyllä rikastunut Sharon oli säälittävä toisin kuin tää tuhnuinen poliisi. Rourkella on hissejä ja robotteja. On minulla niitäkin. Minua kiinnostaa miten apinat on eri välineillä vahingoittaneet toisiaan. Tyylikäs väkivalta sopii miekkoselle hyvin. Kun tyylikäs keskijalkani osui miestä haaroihin hän sai muuta ajateltavaa. Roarke hypisteli taskun kautta esinettä jonka oli sinne tuikannut. Roarken kalu oli kova mutta suu pehmeä. Toisella se töykki ja toisella näykki kuin särki matoa. Hermostunut riemu täytti Even, ja hän tunsi kostuvansa. Voimakas kalu tutisutti häntä. Tässä ja nyt se sinne! Mutta ei. Perinteinen taskupuhelu keskeyttää yhdynnän. Roarke löpsähtää. Taskuun jääussel Even tissinnappi. Typerys.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 544: Rortyn omat, joskus omituiset, Jamesian ja Deweyanin uudelleenlausunnot teemoja” (PSH, xiii). Nämä uudelleenlausunnot menevät niin pitkälle kuin suosittelevat sitä, mitä James ja Deweyn olisi pitänyt sanoa. James should have been satisfied with ‘‘The Will to Believe’’ rather than ending with a ‘‘brave and exuberant ‘‘Conclusion’’ to Varieties of Religious Experience’’. Bernstein finds Rorty guilty of fabricating a Nietzscheanized James or a Wittgensteinianized Derrida or a Heideggerianized Dewey. In this way, Rorty practiced something of what the ancients called "wisdom", and we moderns call "self help".
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 560: The SPERMA model is a model Seligman developed to explain what contributes to a sense of flourishing. The five factors in this model are:
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 610: Rorty narrates that the West’s first redemptive principle was man’s relationship with God, the guarantor of universal truth, meaning, and salvation. God was eventually dethroned by the Truth of philosophy, as heralded by the Enlightenment and the scientific revolution. Truth’s goal was to decipher reality’s blueprint. At present, the truth is being nudged over by the Imagination. The modern imagination aspires to enlarge our acquaintance with humanity and enrich ethical relations. Rorty argues that a culture of imagination can serve the redemptive purposes previously ministered by religion and truth, only in a manner more suited to a liberal, secular context. He calls this a literary culture, a culture where meaningful human relationships are ‘‘mediated by human artifacts such as books and buildings, paintings and songs’’ (TRR, p. 478). For Rorty, the literary culture may successfully usher a new world motivated by the ideal of human solidarity.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 615: 123 he desires a human culture fueled by an ethic of self-reliance. Why then does Rorty, a resolutely anti-transcendent pragmatist, brazenly harp on the redemption trope? What purpose does this religiously-inspired idea serve in his project? How will the use of the religious concept impact our current understanding of Rorty’s pragmatism?
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 624: He shares this
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 637: The length of a non-erect penis doesn't consistently predict length when the penis is erect. If your penis is about 5 inches (13 cm) or longer (up to a foot) when erect, it's of typical size. A penis is considered small only if it measures less than 3 inches (about 7.5 centimeters) when erect. This is a condition called micropenis. Understanding your partner's needs and desires is more likely to improve your sexual relationship than changing the size of your penis. Except if your partner can't feel your micropenis and wants a bigger dick.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 639: Exercises. Sometimes called jelqing, these exercises use a hand-over-hand motion to push blood from the base to the head of the penis. Although this technique appears safer than other methods, there's no scientific proof it works. And it can lead to scar formation, pain and disfigurement.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 650: There is a place where we are always alone with our own mortality, where we must simply have something greater than ourselves to hold onto—God or history or politics or literature or a belief in the healing power of love, or even righteous anger. Sometimes I think they are all the same. A reason to believe, a way to take the world by the throat and insist that there is more to this life than we have ever imagined (Allison 1994, p. 181; PSH, p. 161)
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 652: Why bother? Why not just give up and say: this was it, paska reisu mutta tulipahan tehtyä. Mutta takaisin Rortyn motiiveihin! 70-luvun Gadamer-innostus ja sen "ihmistieteet on ihan eri asia kuin luonnontieteet" humanistinen hengenkohotus oli vain eräs muunnos vanhasta kunnon saxalaisesta idealismista. Mänköön vuan huuthelekkariin muiden mukana. "The trail of the human serpent is over all", kuten Jameskin leukavasti laukaisi. Rorty peukutti nazi-Heideggeria, joka puolestaan siteerasi hullu-Hölderliniä (kz. albumia 40).
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 918: Sitten kaikki varmaan puhuisivat amerikanenglantia. End of history. In your dreams, Daffy Duck.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 922: Hyperion (m.kreik. Ὑπερίων) oli yksi Hesiodoksen teoksessaan Jumalten synty (Theogonia) esittelemistä kreikkalaisen mytologian titaaneista, itään yhdistetty valon jumaluus, joka sisarensa Theian kanssa synnytti Auringon (Helios), Kuun (Selene) ja Aamunkoiton (Eos). Myös Auringosta käytetään usein nimeä Hyperion. Hyperion oli Gaian (Maa) ja Uranoksen (Taivas) poika. Hyperionin merkitys mytologiassa on hyvin vähäinen, sillä hänet vain mainitaan titaanien luettelossa. Eikai se synnyttänyt vaan siitti, se sisko synnytti. Aika sukuruzaisia oli titaanit, niinkö tietysti olosuhteiden pakosta myös Aatamin ja Eevan lähisukulaiset.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 931: Eli siis Tarina kertoo seitsemän pyhiinvaeltajan matkasta kohti Hyperion-planeetan aikahautoja, jotka ovat Lepinkäisen koti. Lepinkäinen ei ole lintu, vaan on olento, joka voi muuttaa fysiikan lakeja. Aikahautojen ympäristössä avaruusalusten miehistö katoaa ja pyhiinvaeltajat joutuvat taittamaan matkaa vanhanaikaisemmin tavoin. Aikansa kuluksi he päättävät kertoa toisilleen tarinansa ja syynsä, jotka saivat heidät ryhtymään tähän matkaan.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 945: Brawne Lamia’s name comes from a combination of John Keats’ beloved Fanny Brawne, and his poem named Lamia (1819). She is described as a rather short and muscular with an intense gaze. She has shoulder-length black curls, dark eyes, sharp nose and wide expressive mouth. She is said to be very beautiful anyway. She becomes "romantically involved" with Johnny and pregnant to boot. She's from Lusus, a world that has gravity 1.3 times stronger than that of Earth. Because of that, she's shorter than many others, but has "heavy layers of mussel". Varoitus! seuraava kuva paljastaa yxityiskohtia ulkosynnyttimistä!
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 972: Alle Jahre wieder geht er um wie ein Virus: der Wunsch, alles stehen und liegen zu lassen, auf dem Jakobsweg zu wandern oder mit dem Segelboot die Welt zu umrunden. Ob bewusst oder nicht: All die Zivilisationsmüden treten in die Fußstapfen des griechischen Einsiedlers Hyperion, erfunden von Friedrich Hölderlin. Hyperions Lebensgeschichte ist Hölderlins literarische Anklage gegen das spießbürgerliche, dumpfe und materialistische Deutschland seiner Zeit, das ihm als Künstler und Idealisten kaum Luft zum Atmen ließ, nein in einen Turm einschließ. Seine Sprache war schon damals gewöhnungsbedürftig und ist es heute erst recht: Da „säuseln holdselige Tage“, es neigen sich „lispelnde Bäume“ und es „gährt das Leben“. Doch die Fragen des lange verkannten Genies sind nicht aus der Welt: Wie kann der Mensch seine Vereinzelung überwinden? Auf welchem Weg eine bessere Welt schaffen? Und wie im Einklang mit der Natur leben? Das antike Griechenland mag heute als Vorbild ausgedient haben, aber die Suche nach Antworten auf diese Fragen bleibt aktuell.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 983: Die Handlung spielt vor dem Hintergrund des griechischen Aufstands gegen die Türken im Jahr 1770.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 1043: and welcome to our German Word of the Day. This time we’ll have a look at the meaning of
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 1051: The origin of Erlösung is the super ancient Indo-European root leu. Leu was about the idea of losing something and naturally, first this was focused on virginity and beaver hunting. In Latin on the other hand, the root shifted to a more sophisticated sense of washing and shaving of the mussel. That’s where ablution and absolution comes from, by the way, as in ego te absolvo, ense candido conchulam in candidam.
    xxx/ellauri312.html on line 1055: yaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwnnnnnn… my god, this is soooo boring. And there are still 10 pages. Daniel, dude, why did you make that so boring….. what?…… boring topic? No man, there’s no such thing as a boring topic. There’s just boring presentation… yeah… look, we’re live so I can’t explain that now but we’ll talk later, okay… … … cool… oh, can you fetch me a coffee? Thanks.
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 99: He was born into a Jewish family of Polish-Jewish descent. His father was born in Radomyśl Wielki, Galicia (then part of Austria-Hungary, now Poland), and his mother was a native of New York whose parents also arrived from that town. Isidore owned a women's clothing manufacturing business employing 400 people. They owned a summer house in Far Rockaway, Queens, and employed a chauffeur. In the Wall Street Crash of 1929, the family lost almost everything and moved to Gravesend, Brooklyn.
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 101: On May 1, 1935, he joined the League of American Writers (1935–1943), whose members were largely either Communist Party members or fellow travelers. In Rowe's view, all successful plays built dramatically from an "attack" (the introduction of a conflict), through a "crisis," and finally to a "resolution." Rowe consulted his government consulting on the use of drama as a propaganda tool to raise morale and to define America's goals during the war.
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 113: Ei Shane kuitenkaan, josta näkyy tulleen nimekäs rullalautturi. His normal stance is Goofy. In Shane's 2015 "Shane Goes Skate Mental" video part, Shane performed a nollie backside heelflip down the steps at Wallenberg. This is one of the most difficult tricks a skateboarder has done at this location. Shane O’Neill (n. 1530 – 2. kesäkuuta 1567 lähellä Cushendumia, Antrimin kreivikunta) oli irlantilainen aatelisherra, joka johti 1560-luvulla kapinaa Englannin ylivaltaa vastaan. MacDonnellien joukot kuitenkin hyökkäsivät petollisesti hänen kimppuunsa ja surmasivat hänet. Näin englantilaiset pääsivät eroon O’Neillista, jota he eivät itse olleet kyenneet kukistamaan.
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 197: Vuonna 1980 naapurimaa Algeriassa iskenyt järistys oli puolestaan yksi lähihistorian suurimmista ja tuhoisimmista maanjäristyksistä. El-Asnamiin iskenyt järistys oli voimakkuudeltaan 7,3 ja se surmasi 2 500 ihmistä. Lisäksi ainakin 300 000 jäi kodittomaksi.
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 218: Kovaa äherrystä autotallin perällä Helyn kimpussa. Käsipelillä venkutettuna tuli sentään nahistunut terska ulos esinahasta, että sai edes otetuxi nämä kaunistellut näpäyxet Helyn pukilta. Siihen se sitten valitettavasti jäi. Kun juot mietoa teetä on kuin suutelisit epämieluista naista. Hely olis mieluisa, tiukka vee kuin vahva tee, mutta voi nössö kun ei voi seisoa, ei käskien eikä pyytäen. Löysällä letkulla puuhastelun päätteexi ei edes ruiskaha, jotain voimatonta limaa saattaa Helyyn kyrvänpäästä laihaxi kiitoxexi valua.
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 230: Nanami pikku ystävineen teki tässä videossa "nörtille" kepposen. Ne oli niin vekkuleita että "nörtin" nahistunut "pikkuveikka" innostui kazelemaan mukana. Tosin avustettuna.
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 233:
    Nahistunut pikkuveikka seuraa kaula pitkänä japsumerkkisiä imureita työn touhussa.

    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 276: fortune shared with his six siblings and stepmother, and Kim Jung-yang, whose
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 292: who was also estranged from his biological father. Niinpä, juutalaisten Jehovakin
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 295: Jobs was placed for adoption as an infant by his biological parents,
    xxx/ellauri314.html on line 298: Jorgensen and Jackie Gise, who were still teenagers at the time. By June 1965, his
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 119: During his lifetime Chamberlain's works were read widely throughout Europe, and especially in Germany. His reception was particularly favourable among Germany's conservative elite. Kaiser Wilhelm II patronised Chamberlain, maintaining a correspondence, inviting him to stay at his court, distributing copies of The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century among the German Army, and seeing that The Foundations was carried in German libraries and included in the school curricula. The only Nazi idea that Chamberlain missed was Lebensraum. Mies oli muutenkin täys pöljä ja luonnontieteilijänä yhtä kehno kuin J.W. v.Goethe.
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 251: Tämä kertomus löytyi "Greedy finance" nimiseltä palstalta, se oli täynnä mainoskatkoja. Pääasia oli kazoa ne kaikki mainoxet. Ads help us run this site. By continuing your navigation on our site, pre-selected companies may set cookies or access and use sensitive information on your device to serve relevant ads or personalized content.
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 278: Pikku-Venäjä ei siis koskaan ollut valtio, eikä sillä ollut historiaa sanan varsinaisessa merkityksessä. Pikku-Venäjän historia on vain episodi tsaari Oleksii Mihailovitšin hallituskaudesta ... Pikku-Venäjän historia on sivujoki, joka virtaa Venäjän historian suureen jokeen. Pikkuvenäläiset ovat aina olleet heimo, eivätkä ole koskaan olleet kansa, saati vähemmän valtio.
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 282: Hänen Ukrainan vastaiset näkemyksensä ilmaistiin erityisen ankarasti kirjallisuuskriitikko Pavlo Annenkoville vuonna 1847 lähettämässään kirjeessä, jossa hän puhui loukkaavasti ukrainalaisista kirjailijoista Taras Shevchenkosta ja Panteleimon Kulishista . Erityisesti Belinsky kirjoitti:
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 284: Muistatteko, että eräs uskonnollinen ystäväni kertoi minulle uskovansa, että Shevchenko oli arvokas ja kaunis henkilö. Usko tekee ihmeitä - hän luo ihmisiä aaseista ja seeproista, joten hän voi myös tehdä Shevchenkosta kenties vapauden marttyyrin. Mutta terveen järjen pitäisi nähdä Shevchenko perseenä, tyhmänä ja roistona, ja lisäksi katkerana juomarina, vodkan rakastajana Khokhla-isänmaallisuuden vuoksi. Tämä Khokhla-radikaali kirjoitti kaksi paskvillia suvereenista keisarista – yhden suvereenista keisarista ja toisen suvereenista keisarinnasta … En ole lukenut näitä paskiileja, eikä kukaan tuntemani ole lukenut niitä (mikä muuten todistaa, että ne eivät ole ollenkaan pahoja, vaan vain litteitä ja tyhmiä), mutta olen varma, että keisarinnan pasquillin täytyy olla törkeän ruma jo mainitsemastani syystä. Shevchenko lähetettiin Kaukasiaan sotilaana. En sääli häntä, jos olisin hänen tuomarinsa, en tekisi vähempää. Minulla oli henkilökohtainen vihamielisyys tällaisia ​​liberaaleja kohtaan. Yksi Khokhlan liberaaleista, tietty Kulish (sellaisen sian sukunimi!) julkaisi Pikku-Venäjän historian "Zirochkassa", joka tunnetaan myös nimellä ... Isimovin julkaisemassa lapsille tarkoitetussa lehdessä, jossa hän sanoi, että Pikku-Venäjän täytyy joko erota Venäjältä tai hukkuu... Tätä he tekevät nämä karjat, aivottomat liberaalit. Oi, rakastan niitä! Lampaathan ovat liberaaleja nyytien ja silakan kera nyytien nimissä... (jupisee venäjäxi)
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 288: Huolimatta suuresta määrästä vulgaarisimpia ja yleisimpiä sanoja ja ilmaisuja, vailla yksinkertaisuutta, fiktiot ja tarinat, jotka ovat täynnä omituisia ja temppuja, jotka ovat tyypillisiä kaikille huonoille pieteille, eivät useinkaan ole kansanmusiikkia, vaikka niitä tukevat viittaukset historia, laulut ja legendat, ja siksi kaikista näistä syistä - ne ovat tavallisille ihmisille käsittämättömiä, eikä niissä ole mitään, mikä olisi heille myötätuntoinen (jorisee venäjäxi).
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 289: Neuvostoliiton kirjallisuustutkimus ei mainostanut tällaista kriitikon asennetta ukrainalaisiin runoilijoihin, vaan se puhui "kunnioittavasti" asenteesta sekä "edistyksellisten suuntausten tukemisesta", totesi myös "innostuksen Ukrainan kansan sankarillista historiaa kohtaan".
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 293: 30 verstiä ennen Harkovaa näin Pikku-Venäjän, vaikkakin sekaisin edelleen likaisten moskovilaisten kanssa. Khokhlojen talot ovat samanlaisia ​​​​kuin maanviljelijöiden talot - niiden puhtaus ja kauneus ovat epätavallisia. Kuvittele, että pikkuvenäläinen borssi on vain vihreä keitto (vain kanan tai lampaan ja maustetun laardin kera), eikä heillä ole aavistustakaan makkaran ja kinkun kera borschista. Tämä heidän valmistamansa keitto on herkullista ja puhdasta. Ja nämä ovat miehiä! Muut kasvot näyttävät erilaisilta. Lapset ovat erittäin söpöjä, kun taas venäläiset lapset ovat katselemattomia - he ovat pahempia ja rumampia kuin siat" (hölöttää venäjäxi)
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 296: Visarion Belinskyi suhtautui kielteisesti Taras Shevchenkon runokokoelman "Kobzar" julkaisemiseen vuonna 1840, mikä oli käännekohta ukrainalaisen kirjallisuuden historiassa, sekä E. Hrebinkan julkaisemaan ukrainalaiseen almanakkaan "Lastivka".. Näiden kahden ukrainalaisen julkaisun julkaiseminen sai V. Belinskyin puhumaan julkisesti ukrainalaisen kirjallisuuden kehitysnäkymistä. Välittämättä lainkaan kummankin kirjan kustannuksista, hän "yhdisti ne yhdeksi kriittiseksi artikkeliksi", koska molemmat oli kirjoitettu "pikkuvenäläisellä murteella". V. Belinsky esittää pohjimmiltaan tärkeän kysymyksen — onko maailmassa edes pientä venäjän kieltä, voiko olla pientä venäläistä kirjallisuutta, ja pitäisikö "meidän" kirjoittajien kirjoittaa pikkuvenäjäksi? Vastauksena näin muotoiltuun kysymykseen hän väitti, ettei kirjallisuudella eikä ukrainan kielellä ole mahdollisuuksia spontaanille kehitykselle, ja hän viittasi Hoholiin esimerkkinä kirjailijasta, joka "on intohimoisesti rakastunut Ukrainaan, mutta tästä huolimatta kirjoittaa venäjäksi, ei ukrainan kielellä".
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 298: Belinsky selittää suhtautumisensa tähän asiaan yksityiskohtaisemmin Mykola Markevitšin "Pikku-Venäjän historian" katsauksessaan, jossa hän kirjoittaa kirjaimellisesti seuraavan:
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 311: Manuel Bandeira, Brazilian poet, had tuberculosis in 1904 and expressed the effects of the disease in his life in many of his poems
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 317: Edward Bellamy (1850–1898), fiction writer remembered for his book Looking Backward, died from tuberculosis
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 325: Anne and Emily Brontë and other members of the Brontë family of writers, poets and painters were struck by tuberculosis. Anne, their brother Branwell, and Emily all died of it within two years of each other. Charlotte Brontë's death in 1855 was stated at the time as having been due to tuberculosis, but there is some controversy over this today. Näyttää siltä, ​​että hän myös tuli nopeasti raskaaksi; vaikka hän ei ole koskaan maininnut häntä erityisesti tämänaikaisessa kirjeenvaihdossaan, hän pyytää neuvoja ihmisiltä, ​​jotka ovat saaneet vauvoja, vartioidulla kielellä, jota voidaan helposti tulkita. Brontën pappilamuseossa on myös pieni, kaunis ja liikkuva vauvanhuppari, jonka ystävä oli valmistanut Charlottelle tulevaa iloista tapahtumaa varten. Sitä ei koskaan tapahtunut. Vuonna 1972 Lontoon yliopiston synnytys- ja gynekologian professori, professori Philip Rhodes totesi, että "todisteet ovat melko selvät siitä, että hän kuoli hyperemesis gravidurumiin, raskauden turmiolliseen oksentamiseen." Charlotte oli 39 kun se oxensi viimeisen oxennuxensa. Niis, kirjoitat niin kauniisti Bronten perheestä..

    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 343: Albert Camus, French writer, playwright, activist, and absurdist philosopher, suffered from tuberculosis. He was forced to drop out of school (University of Algiers) due to severe attacks of tuberculosis. However, his death was caused by a car accident.
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 393: Franz Kafka (1883–1924), German-language novelist best known for his novel The Trial, died from tuberculosis
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 399: John Keats (1795–1821), English Romantic poet; he and his brother Tom were taken by tuberculosis
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 443: George Orwell (1903–1950), British author of Nineteen Eighty-Four, Animal Farm and Homage to Catalonia, first suffered tuberculosis in the early 1930s and died from it in 1950, at the age of 46. Nineteen Eighty-Four was written during his final illness.
    xxx/ellauri319.html on line 505: Robert Louis Stevenson (1850–1894), Neo-romantic Scottish essayist, novelist and poet, is thought to have suffered from tuberculosis during much of his life. He spent the winter of 1887–1888 recuperating from a presumed bout of tuberculosis at Dr. E.L. Trudeau's Adirondack Cottage Sanitarium in Saranac Lake, New York.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 42: Suomesta näyttää tulevan uusi Kuuba, kun Sale ottaa tänne jenkkitukikohtia. Kohta paukkuu ohjuxet meidän päiden yli, sitten kohti. Samaan aikaan toisaalla Hoblan haukka ajaa Ukrainalle pitkän matkan ohjuxia, aivan sekopää. Kuuma loppu näyttää tulevan historian kuumimmalle vuodelle.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 53: What is real, lasting happiness? How does one achieve it? And why are so many people holding themselves back? At the heart of this profound, simple, beautiful book is the wisdom of Mildred Newman and Bernard Berkowitz, married psychoanalysts who encourage readers to both love themselves and to confront life's hardest truths.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 99: Ettekö kannusta ihmisiä kovin suureen izekeskeisyyteen? Näen vaimon tervehtivän tyydytystä säteilevin silmin miestään tämän palatessa illalla nälkäisenä kotiin. Mies kazelee kauhistuneena itkeviä lapsia ja sijaamattomia vuoteita ja kysyy: "Missä on päivällinen?" Vaimo heiluttaa paperinpalaa ja huudahtaa: "Sen sijasta kirjoitin runon!"
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 101: Luultavasti perin harva vaimo olisi tyytyväinen jos kirjoittaisi runon tuolla hinnalla - ainakaan useammin kuin kerran. Musta silmä opettaa. A good wife knows her place. She fixes her makeup before the husband returns from work and tells the hungry kids to pipe down until he has eaten. She asks him how his day has been and does not volunteer her own hardships during the day.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 127: Smuts uskoi, että evoluutio sisältää asteittaisen sarjan pienempiä kokonaisuuksia, jotka integroituvat suurempiin kokonaisuuksiin. Seuraava vaihe on kaikkien kapitalistimaiden yhdentyminen ja historian loppu ihmispesän onnelliseen pörinään. Vaikka Smutsin tekstiä Holismi ja evoluutio pidetään tieteenteoksena, se itse asiassa yrittää yhdistää evoluution korkeamman metafyysisen prinsiipin (holismi) kanssa. Eri uskonnollisissa perinteissä (mm. kristinusko, juutalaisuus, zoroastrilaisuus, islam, buddhalaisuus ja bahá'i) kunnioitettu yhteyden ja ykseyden tunne löytää vahvan täydennyksen Adlerin ajatuksissa.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 172: Shortly before the Duke of Sutherland's death in 1963, he and his second Duchess met Cartland at a lunch party in London. Clearly aware of her husband's amorous exploits, Clare Sutherland turned to Cartland and said: 'Of course, Raine is Geordie's daughter.'
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 179: But on the return journey, his borrowed de Havilland Tiger Moth bi-plane broke up in mid-air while flying through a dust storm in South Africa, and crashed on the Drakensberg Mountains.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 181: When locals located the wreckage, they found Kidston's body with six photographs of Cartland in Nile blue leather frames. 'These were returned to me by his sister,' she said. 'It was heart-breaking.'
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 186: But McCorquodale counterpetitioned and - though frankly doubtful that Raine was his biological child - claimed custody of their daughter.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 192: But then she left her husband to co-habit with the divorced Earl Spencer, much to the horror and resentment of his four children, who detested her. At the time, Raine told her mother bluntly: 'I am wildly in love and there is nothing anyone can do about it.'
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 195: Despite this very pointed rebuff, Cartland's confidence in these years seemed ever burgeoning - at the age of 77, she even recorded an album of love songs which were so hilarious that it became a collector's item for all the wrong reasons.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 198: From the moment Dickie fixed his eyes on her, spoke to her in that deep, amazingly attractive voice - she was his.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 199: But in actual fact their relationship was entirely platonic. She was sharply aware that Mountbatten, emasculated by the infidelities of his promiscuous and nymphomaniac wife, Edwina, had scant interest in sex in his later years, particularly with women.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 204: A group of snide and snobbish courtiers, allegedly by Princess Margaret, campaigned to influence Earl Spencer into withdrawing the two tickets he had allocated to his mother-in-law for the wedding in St Paul's Cathedral.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 210: Further evidence that the Spencers, at times, treated Cartland distantly came in 1989 when, for the second time, she became the subject of television's This Is Your Life.
    xxx/ellauri320.html on line 229: Barbara Cartlandin valtavassa takakatalogissa on satoja historiallisia puhtaita romansseja täynnä huimia prinssejä, itsenäisiä ja vahvoja sankarittaria, synkkiä rakkauskilpailijoita ja jännittäviä paljastuksia, jotka ovat täynnä onnellisia loppuja. Valitse kirjat, joita haluat selata annettujen suodattimien avulla.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 79: Maapallon rippeet kuhisevat apinapaskiaisia. Helsingin kaupunki raiskaa Stansvikin rantamezää jotta varakkaammat saavat pistetaloistaan merinäköalaa, tappaa tuottamuxellisesti liito-oravat tekemällä niiden habitaatista puistoa ja parkkipaikkoja. Sellasia nimbyjä on paikalliset köyhimyxet ja muut luontokappaleet etteivät sallisi onnekkaammille ja yritteliäämmille merinäkymää.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 97: In 2004, Harper’s magazine published Natasha, a first short story by a promising 31-year-old Jewish Canadian writer, David Bezmozgis. This memorable tale of a doomed teenage love between Mark, a Jewish Toronto slacker, and his troubled (shiksa) Russian cousin by marriage was eventually released in a collection chronicling the lives of a Latvian immigrant family, not unlike the author’s own. Bezmozgis’s debut became a cult sensation with critics drawing literary comparisons to Bernard Malamud and Philip Roth. The story was subsequently reprinted in 15 languages. After penning two more acclaimed novels, then writing and directing his first feature Victoria Day (SFJFF 2010), Bezmozgis finally brings his modern classic to the big screen in a remarkably assured adaptation that’s both highly provocative and deeply poignant. At the heart of this emotional, coming-of-age drama are the extraordinarily measured performances of Alex Ozerov as Mark and newcomer Sasha K. Gordon as the sexually precocious Natasha, the dark star who forever alters Mark’s staid, suburban existence. Fans of the writer’s original source material will not be disappointed in David Bezmozgis’s haunting narrative of forbidden love caught between the old world and the new, further proof of this talented artist’s notable command of both literature and the cinema. —Thomas Logoreci Note: Mature Content. A New Life in the west means a second chance for precocious Latvian jews.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 144: Rödhårig forskare smusslar undan en förhistorisk fallos. Kapten Pulteri och hans besättning håller i penisen med båda händer, men den vill inte stå i alla fall. Valitettavasti tämäkin tussutaiteilija on jo vainaja. Niinkuin me kaikki katoamme kerran.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 182: Vielä 1 pilaantunut länsitomaatti: I don't know what John Huston was thinking to direct 'Beat the Devil', but to tell the truth his adventure comedy starring Humphrey Bogart seems a bit dull to me. [Full review in Spanish]
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 291: "Mark on oppinut venäläisten helmasynnin passiivisuuden ja optimismin puutteen hinnan", Ozerov sanoi. "Hän uskoi, että kaikki pysyisi aina ennallaan, mutta eipä pysynyt! Neuvostoliitto romahti. Ja kun Mark vihdoin taistelee jostakin, on liian myöhäistä. Hän ei tajunnut mitä oli menettänyt. Toivon, että yleisö tuntee empatiaa häntä kohtaan, koska olemme kaikki olleet paikassa (luurin kanssa paskahuussissa) jossa olemme olleet hiljaa liian kauan ja silmänräpäyksessä kaikki muuttuu, vesi kohisee ja se on poissa. Se on katumusta, joka syö meidät hengiltä."
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 341: Aleksijevitš pohjaa romaaninsa valtavaan määrään haastatteluja. Hän kiertelee kaupunkeja ja maaseutua ja etsii ihmisiä, jotka ovat omakohtaisesti kokeneet tai todistaneet omin silmin jotain sellaista, mistä Aleksijevitš haluaa kirjoittaa. Hän ei haastattele virallisia tahoja tai valtaapitäviä, vaan etsii aivan tavallisia ihmisiä: työmiehiä, naisia, lapsia. Hän antaa kirjoissaan äänen niille, joita ei historiakirjoista yleensä löydy. Näiden satojen haastatteluiden jälkeen Aleksijevitš alkaa työstää kirjaa ja jokainen prosessi kestää useita vuosia. Ei siis mikään ihme, ettei häneltä tärähdä markkinoille vuosittain uutta teosta. Sittenpä ne ovat sitä paxumpia!
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 343: Kotisivuillaan Aleksijevitš kertoo etsineensä kauan kirjallisuudenlajia, joka sopisi hänen tapaansa ajatella ja katsoa maailmaa. Kaikenlaisten kirjallisten kokeilujen jälkeen hän löysi dokumenttiromaanin, joka tuntui heti omalta. Hänen missionaan on sanoittaa historiaa yksilöiden kautta ja tuoda historiakirjoitukseen erityisesti mukaan tunteet: sen miltä ihmisistä tapahtumahetkellä tuntui ja miltä heistä tuntuu nyt, kun tapahtumista on kulunut vuosikymmeniä. Harva kauheita kokenut pystyy vuosienkaan jälkeen puhumaan näkemästään ja kokemastaan ilman liikutusta. Historia on täynnä tunnetta, jonka perinteinen historiakirjoitus on häivyttänyt olemattomiin.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 345: Molemmat Aleksijevitšin suomennetut teokset ovat valtavan hienoja lukuelämyksiä. Ne järkyttävät ja koskettavat, vaikkei niissä kauheuksilla mässäilläkään. Tarinallinen tietokirjallisuus, jota Aleksijevitškin osittain edustaa, on kovassa nosteessa nykyään, eikä mikään ihme, sillä yksilöiden kertomuksiin kiedotut historian tapahtumat tulevat lähemmäs lukijaa: ne tuovat historian samalla kertaa ymmärrettävämmiksi ja kauhistuttavammiksi.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 357: Naisten kuvaukset rintamalta antavat sodasta kauhistuttavan ja totuudenmukaisen kuvan. Aleksijevitšin kirjan luettuaan ymmärtää, ettei sota koskaan ole ulkokohtaista, videopelimäistä räiskintää, vaan jokainen siihen osallistuva joutuu sen nielemäksi, kokemaan ja tuntemaan kaiken. Eikä kukaan palaa kotiin ennallaan. Eivät naiset, eivätkä miehet, eivätkä varsinkaan ruumissäkit.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 361: Sitten sodat saivat väistyä uuden aiheen tieltä. 1990-luvun puolessa välissä Aleksijevitš tarttui aiheeseen, josta hänellä itselläänkin oli valkovenäläisenä omakohtaista kokemusta. Huhtikuun 26. päivänä, puoli kahden maissa yöllä Tsernobylin ydinvoimalan neljäs reaktori räjähti. Taivas värjäytyi ensin punaiseksi, sitten siniseksi ja sen jälkeen voimalan ylle muodostui sienen muotoinen pilvi. Ihmiset ryntäsivät ikkunoihin ja kaduille katselemaan ihmeellisen kaunista näkyä, eivätkä ymmärtäneet todistavansa yhtä maailmanhistorian vakavinta katastrofia.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 386: Tässä se nyt on vapaus! Tällaistako me odotimme? Me olimme valmistautuneet kuolemaan ihanteidemme vuoksi. Käymaan taistelua. Mutta alkoikin "tšehovilainen" elämä. Vailla historiaa. Kaikki arvot romahtivat, paitsi elämän arvo. Elämän sinänsä. Ruplan etunenässä. Tuli uudet haaveet: saisi rakentaa talon, ostaa hyvän auton, istuttaa karviaispensaan... Vapaus merkitsikin pikkuporvarillisuuden arvonpalautusta, tuon jolle isovenäläisessä elämässä oli yleensä annettu turpiin. Hänen Majesteettinsa Kulutuksen vapautta. Pimeyden suuruutta. Toiveiden ja vaistojen pimeyttä - tuon salatun inhimillisen matelijan elämän, josta meillä oli vain likimääräinen käsitys. Me olimme käyneet läpi koko historian, mutta emme olleet eläneet sitä. Mutta nyt ei sotakokemusta enää tarvittu, se oli unohdettava. Oli tullut tuhansia uusia tunteita, tiloja, reaktioita. Aivan yhtäkkiä kaikki ympärillä vaihtui toiseksi: kyltit, tavarat, rahat, lippu. Ja ihminen itse. Hänestä oli tullut värikkäämpi ja erillisempi, monoliitti oli räjäytetty rikki ja elämä oli hajonnut saarekkeiksi, atomeiksi, soluiksi. Kuten sana- kirjassa: vapaa - vapaus - vapaa tahto - mielivalta - väljyys - avaruus. Suuri paha muuntui etäiseksi tarinaksi, poliittiseksi dekkariksi. Kukaan ei enää puhunut aatteesta, puhuttiin luotoista, koroista, vekseleistä, rahaa ei enää ansaittu vaan "tehtiin", "hankittiin". Kestäisikö sitä vielä kauan? "Rahan valhe ei katoa venäläisen sielusta", kirjoitti Tsvetajeva. Näytti siltä kuin Aleksandr Ostrovskin kuvaamat kauppiaat ja Saltykov-Štšedrinin tilanomistajat olisivat heränneet eloon ja kuljeskelisivat meidän kaduillamme.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 388: Ihminen joka kaupassa voi valita 100 makkaralajista on vapaampi kuin se jonka kaupassa on vain 10. Is this cheese? Wat is this? Is this too cheese? Vapaus on sitä että on paljon rahaa, silloin voi saada kaiken. Vittu on se säälittävää. Kerta kaikkiaan turveloita nuo Alexijevan uudet ryssät.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 441: Tsaritsynin puolustaminen, lempinimeltään "Punainen Verdun ", oli yksi laajimmin kuvatuista ja muistetuista sisällissodan tapahtumista Neuvostoliiton historiankirjoituksessa, taiteessa ja propagandassa. Tämä johtui siitä, että Josif Stalin osallistui kaupungin puolustamiseen heinä-marraskuussa 1918.
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 513: No ohjaaja oli käyttänyt taiteellisia vapauksiaan ja hieman muokannut juonenkäänteitä. Varsinkin romantiikan lisääminen oli ainakin naiskatseiljoille mieluisaa. Lisäksi tarina oli älykäs. Tarinan sijoittuminen 1930-luvulle oli niin kulttuuri- kuin yhteiskuntahistoriallisestikin kiinnostavaa. Nostalgiset vaatteet ja vanhat kuorma-autot olivat hauskoja! :)
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 518: ulkomaalaisia kohtaan voisivat muuttua. Kaikesta angloamerikkalaisen kulttuuriin ylivallasta huolimatta meitä Venäjän historiasta ja nykypäivästä kiinnostuneita on Suomessa edelleen monia! BUAHAHAHAHAHA läppä läppä LOL!
    xxx/ellauri329.html on line 520: Ukrainanjuutalaisen Anatoli Rybakovin kirjoittama tiiliskiviromaani Arbatin lapset on meille suomalaisillekin tärkeä kirja. Toisille ehkä katkeran kalkin viimeistä juomista, toisille vahingoniloista synninpäästöä, monille ehkä merkityksetöntä vanhan paskan jauhamista. Mutta oman historiamme ymmärtämisen kannalta Venäjän lähihistorian ymmärtäminen lienee yhtä tärkeää kuin oman poliittisen todellisuutemme tajuaminen yleensä.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 83: In seiner Darstellung von Randfiguren der Gesellschaft propagiert Böll Humanität und Antifaschismus und prangert rassistische Ansichten an.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 125: Roman Sandgruber ist emeritierter Professor für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte an der Linzer JKU und Mitglied der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und ein gläubiget Katholiker. Er arbeitet an einem Buch über Hitlers Vater, das 2021 erscheinen wird. Er schämt sich Linzer zu sein, er ist dem Alois und Adi sehr böse immer noch. Er will von Heidlers alias Schlumpfgrubers Halbjudentum nichts hören. Leserfavoriten, meist gelesen: https:1//www.nachrichten.at/oberoesterreich/linz/linz-unbekannte-schlagen-43-jaehrigen-in-fh-toilette-zusammen. Der Christkindl ist wieder unterwegs. Lakimiehet saisi kaikki hävittää, sanoi Adolf nasevasti. Hitlerit pitivät katolista kirkkoa ahneena ja elämää vääristävien uskomusten opettajana. Sandgruberin kirja Hitlerin isästä ja Adolf-pojan kasvusta sisältää sivutolkulla pieteetillä valittuja yksityiskohtia ja kuvauksia suvun asuinpaikkakunnista. Mukana on kaikkea mahdollista nippelitietoa. Putinia ja Hitleriä yhdistää monikin asia, äkkää HS:n Anne Välinoro lopuxi vielä norauttaa vaipanvälistä. Putinia ja Hitleriä yhdistää täydellinen piittaamattomuus valtioiden rajoista ja itsemääräämisoikeudesta, fantasia oman historiallis-etnisen suurvallan kokoamisesta ja pitkälle pohjustettu propagandakoneisto. Kuulostaa jatkosodan Suomelta. Ei päivää ilman propagandaa.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 177: Der Roman beginnt mit einer ungewöhnlichen Widmung: „Für Leni, Lev und Boris“ – also für die Hauptfiguren der Geschichte. Es handelt sich beim Gruppenbild mit Dame um die Rekonstruktion eines Lebens anhand von Zeugenaussagen, Erinnerungen und Dokumenten. Böll vermischt Fakten mit erfundenen „Originaldokumenten“, er entwirft eine fiktive Handlung unter Bezugnahme auf historische Ereignisse, zum Beispiel den Bombenkrieg, die Nürnberger Prozesse, Adenauers Reise nach Moskau 1955. Die Romanstruktur ist nicht strikt chronologisch, sondern sprunghaft, episodisch, wie die Zeugenaussagen voller Wiederholungen und Ungenauigkeiten und daher oftmals verwirrend. Als Erzähler tritt ein namenloser Verfasser auf, der sich oft mit Beschreibungen von Interieurs und Interviewsituationen aufhält und ein Faible für Abkürzungen und Initialen hat, was dem Leser viel Aufmerksamkeit abverlangt. Der Roman hat Längen da, wo all die Erinnerungen und subjektiven Bewertungen der Beteiligten vorbeiziehen, nimmt aber im letzten Fünftel, als die Handlung auf ihr Happening-artiges Ende zuläuft, deutlich Tempo auf. Böll nutzt das Potenzial der deutschen Sprache für Schachtelwörter zu kreativen sozialkritischen Neuprägungen. Vielerorts ist er sarkastisch, ätzend, bissig. Er schreibt häufig in indirekter Rede und hat sich von der schlichte Prosa seiner Trümmerliteratur und Kurzgeschichten weit fortentwickelt.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 181: Böll propagiert Humanität und Antifaschismus. Er zeigt die Ausgesonderten der Gesellschaft, die sich nicht den Moralvorstellungen und dem Leistungsstreben des Kapitalismus unterordnen. Ein vielstimmiger Chor von Verfolgten, Mitläufern, Nazis und Kriegsgewinnlern zeigt, dass nazistische Ansichten nach 1945 noch immer frisch waren. Der Russe, von den Nazis als „Untermensch“ zur Vernichtung bestimmt, erscheint im Roman als intelligenter, sensibler und liebenswerter Mensch.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 193: Stein aloitti opiskelunsa Breslaun yliopistossa, missä hän opiskeli psykologiaa, saksaa ja historiaa. Hän kuitenkin kiinnostui tieteenfilosofiasta, ja hän lähti vuonna 1913 Göttingenin yliopistoon opiskelemaan fenomenologiaa juutalaisen Edmund Husserlin alaisuudessa. Stein seurasi Husserlia Freiburgin yliopistoon tämän pyynnöstä. Siellä Stein väitteli vuonna 1916 tohtoriksi. Tämän jälkeen hän alkoi työskennellä Husserlin apulaisena. Hän valmisteli tehtävässään käsikirjoituksia julkaisuja varten.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 209: Max Ferdinand Scheler (* 22. August 1874 in München; † 19. Mai 1928 in Frankfurt am Main) war ein deutscher Philosoph, Anthropologe und Soziologe. Scheler war der Sohn eines Domänenverwalters und einer orthodox-jüdischen Mutter. In Jena wurde Max 1897 bei dem Nobelisten Rudolf Eucken mit dem Thema Beiträge zur Feststellung der Beziehungen zwischen den logischen und ethischen Prinzipien promoviert. Im Jahr 1899 habilitierte er sich in Jena mit dem Thema Die transzendentale und die psychologische Methode. Im selben Jahr heiratete Scheler Amelie Ottilie, geborene Wollmann geschiedene von Dewitz-Krebs (1868–1924). Aufgrund der Lektüre von Husserls Logischen Untersuchungen und eines Skandals um seine Affäre mit Helene Voigt-Diederichs, der Ehefrau von Eugen Diederichs, musste er seine Position in Jena aufgeben.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 213: Ab 1911 begann eine fruchtbare Schaffensperiode mit zahlreichen Publikationen, beginnend mit seinem Hauptwerk über einen ethischen Personalismus. Nach seiner Scheidung im Februar 1912 heiratete er im Dezember desselben Jahres Märit Furtwängler (1891–1971).
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 225: 1925 hielt Max zum ersten Mal Vorlesungen über die Grundzüge der philosophischen Anthropologie, in der er gemäß dem Zeugnis Heideggers das Besondere des Menschen als „Miterwirker Gottes“ jenseits eines einfachen Theismus oder eines verschwommenen Pantheismus herauszuarbeiten suchte.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 250: Max hatte bereits früher angekündigt, eine grundlegende und umfassende ‚Philosophische Anthropologie’ zu veröffentlichen. Nach seinem Tod wurde festgestellt, dass er nicht mal angefangen hatte, sie zu schreiben.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 252: Ernst Cassirer (Jude) und Martin Heidegger (Nazi) stellen fest, dass Scheler kein neuer Entwurf philosophischer Anthropologie gelungen sei. Max sei bipolar gewesen. "Der Mensch ist ein so breites, buntes, mannigfaltiges Ding, dass die Definitionen alle ein wenig zu kurz geraten. Er hat zu viele Enden (2).“
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 504: Genesis 6:1-4 When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 539: Saksalaiset tutkijat ovat piirtäneet kuvan alueen ilmaston historiasta luolissa säilyneisiin tippukivipylväisiin. Niiden radioaktiivisuuden vaihtelu kertoo, että Rameses II:n aikana ilmasto oli kostea ja lämmin mutta muuttui sitten ihan päivän päälle kuivaksi ja paahtavaksi.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 548: Samaan aikaan muutaman sadan kilometrin päässä Santorinin saarella tapahtui yksi ihmiskunnan historian suurimmista tulivuorenpurkauksista. Sen levittämä tuhka pimensi Egyptin taivaan ja aiheutti raekuuroja, sanoo tutkija Nadine vom Blohm Saksan ilmastontutkimuslaitoksesta.
    xxx/ellauri337.html on line 563: Kun luen YLEn tiedeuutisia, olen huomannut Anniina Walliuksen nimen esiintyvän usein artikkelin alussa, etenkin jos kysessä on todella hyvin kirjoitettu ja taustoitettu juttu. Viimeaikisia esimerkkejä ovat gepardit ovat nopeita – onnistuuko sukupuuttoon kuolleen lajin jäsenille pyllistys ja kannattaako se?, jossa gepardien lisäksi puhutaan yleisemmin kissojen tilasta Aasiassa. Kuopallinen vihreää mönjää kertoo Lontoon Longharvest Lane-kadun historiaa – muinaiset käymälät ovat arkeologeille aarreaittoja on myös hyvä esimerkki kiehtovasta jutusta, jossa WC-kansi avattiin selkeästi ja näytettiin miksi huussin löytyminen on hätäisille tutkijoille niin tärkeää.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 165: T.S. Eliot was the poet who perhaps had a permanent place in Kai’s personal literary cosmos – he introduced Eliot’s poetry to Finnish readership in the late 1940s. This passage, from Little Gidding, might well serve as his epitaph.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 184: Laajempaa yleisöä palveli pitkään Laitisen Suomen kirjallisuuden historia (1981) samoin kuin hänen yhdessä Matti Suurpääoman kanssa toimittamansa kahdeksanosainen Suomen kirjallisuuden antologia (1963–75).
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 194: H.K.Riikonen oli Laitisen praktikumin ankkuri, kuin Marko Tapio Saarijärven hiihdossa. Erich Auerbachin toisen maailmansodan aikana Istanbulissa kirjoittama Mimesis oli paizi Riikosen myös Laitisen arvostama teos. Luin sen joskus, ei se ollut kummonen. Jäbä väitti että VT on the cat's whiskers kirjallisuuden ajalla, juutalaisena.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 212: A man at Armes must now serve on his knees, Asemies joutuu tarjoilemaan polvillaan
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 213: And feed on pray'rs, that are Age his alms. Ja rukoilemaan syödäxeen, ne on iän almuja.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 217: I'll teach my Swaines this Carrol for a song. Opetan poikasille tän viisun pikkurahalla.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 220: Goddess, vouchsafe this aged man his right Jumalatar, turvaa vanhuxen tän oikeus
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 234: She suffers a lot of pain and finally delivers a stillborn baby boy. Later the nurse tells him that Catherine is hemorrhaging. He is terrified. He goes to see her, and she dies with him by her side. He leaves the hospital and walks back to his Hotel in the rain.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 236: Hemingway's preoccupation with violence dominated his life. Tässä se nähtiin taas. He won the Nobel prize of literature in 1945. Figures. Big game hunting, deep sea fishing, military exploits, physical prowess, heavy boozing. Ilmiselvä homo.Tästä aiheesta on paljon paasausta ennestäänkin. Old man and the Seagram.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 242: 1. "This is a study of the fictional world of Ernest Hemingway as it is related to the world view of Existentialism. properly speaking,
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 245: 2. In A Farewell to Arms there is this celebrated passage. "There were many words that you could not stand to hear and finally only the names of places had dignity. Certain numbers were the same way and certain dates and these with the names of the places were all you could say and have them mean anything. Abstract words such as glory, honor, courage, or hallow were obscene beside the concrete names of villages, the numbers of roads, the names of rivers, the numbers of regiments and the dates."
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 250: This is existential sentiment, emphasizing the real kinship between the philosophie of existance and the Wissenschaft of phänomenologie; value is
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 253: Sartre has said that the writer's is to cure the "sick" language that is incommunicative. Iris Murdoch, in attempting to answer what the sickness of the language really is, says it is the fact that we can no longer take language for granted as a medium of communication. "Its transparancy has gone. We are like people who for a long time looked out of a window without noticing the glass - and then one day began to notice this too. Hemingway also feals this way. Our time demands a simple prose. with an Eliot-like emphasis on semantics."
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 255: There are two interesting books which treat the effects of the Great war on literature itself. Modris Ekstein's The Rite of Spring, and Samuel Hynes' The First War and English Culture. Don't get too caught up in this stuff as there is no end to it, as far as I can see.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 259: “A coward dies a thousand times before his death, but the valiant taste of death but once. It seems to me most strange that men should fear, seeing that death, a necessary end, will come when it will come.” ― William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar. Silly Bill, the £1000 question is just the when.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 261: Mandel takes a brief reference to an anticlerical novel made by one of the characters in A Farewell to Arms and explores the historical and ideological basis for its presence in the novel. In a novel where the Priest is such an important figure, the discussion of the Catholic Church and the way that soldiers would regard religion becomes an important thematic examination. Mandel traces her exploration of this topic, the translation of this obscure novel, and her subsequent revelations, in a way that makes this chapter a study in scholarship and the excavation of an arcane reference.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 273: Notari’s novel sold 80,000 copies in six months and sales only increased when it was accused of offending public morality; it and its author were acquitted, with Marinetti serving as witness for the defense. “It was Notari’s good fortune,” one scholar writes, “to be accused of obscenity by a court in Parma.... Marinetti, who attended and clearly relished the trial, wrote a detailed account of it for Parisian readers... and then translated his account into Italian, appending a brief, self-congratulatory introduction” (Adamson 97). Marinetti bragged that the trial “gave an extraordinary boost to the book’s sales such that, today, one finds it in all the elegant parlors, in all the bedrooms, under the virginal bedlinens of all the convent-school girls and inside the prayer benches of all the new brides” (qtd. in Adamson 97–98). Notari quickly produced a sequel, Femmina: Scene di una grande capitale (1906), which became a best seller before it too was seized and banned. Notari proudly listed these three books’ sales figures and legal histories in the front matter of his next book, The Black Pig (1907).
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 275: By this time, Notari, born into a poor family, had become quite well-to-do. In 1901 he had married a rich widow, bought an estate, and established a literary salon; in 1910, he launched a publishing house, Società Anonima Notari, through which he later published classical editions, musical scores, and some of his own work, including the first few of what would become a long list of journals devoted to a variety of topics that interested him: sports, theater, medicine, finance, the culinary arts, and, of course, politics.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 279: The Black Pig’s front matter also mentions two earlier publications that reveal Notari’s anticlerical bias: Carducci Intimo (1903), a biography of Giosuè Carducci (1835–1907), the Italian poet, professor, classicist, translator, freethinker, fierce opponent of the Catholic Church, and author of “Hymn to Satan,” who would be awarded the 1906 Nobel Prize in Literature; and Il Papa alla porta! Inchiesta e conclusioni per l’abolizione del Papato (Throw the Pope out! An inquest and conclusions for the abolition of the Papacy), aimed at the recently elected and very conservative Pope Pius X. Notari’s anticlericalism is also visible in his dedication of The Black Pig: “A due invitti innovatori di un Italia pagana e virile, dedico questo libro di demolizione di una Italia chiercuta e bazzotta” (To two indomitable revivers of a pagan and virile Italy, I dedicate this book aimed at the destruction of a tonsured and limp Italy).
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 281: Indeed, as Rinaldi claims, The Black Pig “tells you about those priests” (FTA 8). And it is easy enough to see why the priest thought it “a filthy and vile book.” But Rinaldi’s complaint, that it “shook my faith” (7), needs to be read in the context of everything else we know of this character. If Rinaldi is a real believer—which I doubt—he would disdain Notari’s book, which, although heavily documented, is dripping with scorn, irony, and bias. But if his faith is automatic and largely irrelevant, or if it has already been shaken, he might have read on, attracted by Notari’s wide reading, his witty, strong prose, and his relentlessly rationalist logic, sometimes reminiscent of MarkTwain.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 372: Latin is a common language for the mottos: whether as quotations taken from the Roman writers Ovid, Martial, or Horace, or as translations of time-related sentiments. Mechanick Dialling, a 1769 manual for creating sundials, includes 300 “Latin mottos for dials, with their Meaning in English”, indicative of an expectation that a motto would be added. Margaret Gatty, who wrote the book on sundials (“The Book of Sundials”), collected 1,682 mottos in an appendix to her exhaustive history, taken from instruments all over Europe.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 415: 1S-Town was an American investigative journalism podcast hosted by Brian Reed and created by the producers of Serial and This American Life. In 2012, horologist John B. McLemore sent an email to the staff of the show This American Life asking them to investigate an alleged murder in his hometown of Woodstock, Alabama, a place he claimed to despise. There wasn't any.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 417: Though the podcast was promoted under the name S-Town, Reed reveals in the first episode that this is a euphemism for "Shit-Town", McLemore's derogatory term for Woodstock. McLemore killed himself by drinking potassium cyanide on June 22, 2015, while the podcast was still in production.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 433: Ernest Hemingway in his novel A Farewell to Arms (1929).
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 437: Wilbur Daniel Steele in his short story How Beautiful with Shoes.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 445: Thomas Pynchon for the title of his first published story, The Small Rain (1959).
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 451: Walter Tevis in his novel Mockingbird (1980).
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 481: Jeesus sanoi myös, että Hän ei tule ennen kuin profeetta Danielin puhuma hävitysten kauhistus on tapahtunut ja myös sen jälkeen, kun suuri ahdistus on tullut. Hävityksen kauhistus on, kun laittomuuden mies häpäisee temppelin asettamalla kuvansa siihen. Tämä tarkoittaa, että Jeesus palaa vasta sen jälkeen, kun Jerusalemin temppeli on jälleen rakennettu ja tämä paha mies on autioittanut sen. Nyt juutalaiset ovat palanneet mailleen ja suunnitelmat temppelin rakentamisesta on jo tehty, mutta Jeesus tulee vasta tämän tapahtuman jälkeen. Siis minkä numeroisen temppelin? Selittäkääpä tarkemmin!
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 490: Charlie Brown uskoo, että suurin osa salanimeä kannattavista tutkijoista sijoittaisi sen ensimmäisen vuosisadan loppupuolelle, samaan aikaan kun Ilmestyskirja kirjoitettiin. Nämä tutkijat korostavat "sen synnin miehen" esiintymistä tämän kirjeen toisessa luvussa, olipa tämä persoona identifioitu 1. Johanneksen ja Ilmestyskirjan Antikristukseen tai historialliseen henkilöön, kuten Caligula.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 506: Muinaisten lähteiden mukaan lukien Sozomen (n. 400–450 jKr.) Historia Ecclesiasticassa ja pakanallinen historioitsija ja Julianuksen läheinen ystävä Ammianus Marcellinus temppelin jälleenrakennusprojekti keskeytettiin, koska joka kerta kun työläiset yrittivät rakentaakseen temppelin käyttämällä olemassa olevaa alusrakennetta, ne paloivat maan sisältä tulleissa kauheissa liekeissä ja maanjäristys teki tyhjäksi sen, mitä tehtiin:
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 510: Temppelin uudelleenrakentamisen epäonnistumisen on katsottu johtuvan Galilean maanjäristyksestä vuonna 363 jKr. ja juutalaisten ambivalenssista hanketta kohtaan. Sabotaasi on mahdollisuus, samoin kuin tahaton tulipalo. Jumalallinen väliintulo oli yleinen näkemys sen ajan kristittyjen historioitsijoiden keskuudessa. Kun Julianus kuoli taistelussa alle kolmen vuoden hallituskauden jälkeen, kristityt vahvistivat valtakunnan hallintaansa, ja mahdollisuus rakentaa temppeli uudelleen päättyi.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 532: Välittömin ja ilmeisin este näiden tavoitteiden toteuttamiselle on se, että kaksi 13 vuosisataa vanhaa historiallista islamilaista rakennusta, nimittäin Al Aqsa -moskeija ja Kalliokupoli, on rakennettu Temppelivuoren päälle. Kaikki yritykset vahingoittaa tai rajoittaa pääsyä näihin kohteisiin tai rakentaa juutalaisia ​​rakenteita niiden sisälle, väliin, alle, viereen, ulokkeella niiden päälle tai tilalle, voivat johtaa vakaviin kansainvälisiin konflikteihin, koska muslimimaailman pyhät paikat liittyy näihin kohteisiin.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 536: Lisäksi useimmat ortodoksiset juutalaiset tutkijat torjuvat kaikki yritykset rakentaa temppeli ennen Messiaan tuloa. Tämä johtuu siitä, että on monia epäilyksiä sen tarkan sijainnin suhteen, johon se on rakennettava. Esimerkiksi vaikka mitat on annettu kyynärissä, on olemassa kiistaa siitä, onko tämä mittayksikkö 1,84 jalkaa, tieteellinen konsensus tai 1,43 jalkaa, jonka arvostettu historioitsija Asher Selig Kaufman esitti. Ilman tarkkaa tietoa kyynärän koosta alttaria ei voitu rakentaa. Talmud kertoo, että toisen temppelin rakentaminen oli mahdollista vain Haggain, Sakarjan ja Malakian suoran profeetallisen ohjauksen alaisena. Ilman pätevää profeetallista ilmoitusta olisi mahdotonta rakentaa temppeliä uudelleen, vaikka moskeijat eivät enää olisikaan sen paikalla.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 550: Maimonides kirjoitti The Guide for the Perplexedissä, että "Jumala on tietoisesti siirtänyt juutalaiset pois uhrauksista rukoukseen, koska rukous on palvonnan korkeampi muoto". Kuitenkin juutalaisessa laissa, Mishneh Torah, hän sanoo, että eläinten uhraukset jatkuvat kolmannessa temppelissä, ja kertoo kuinka ne suoritetaan. Jotkut [ kuka? ] uskovat rabbi Abraham Isaac Kookin näkemyksen, että eläinuhreja ei palauteta. Näitä temppelipalvelusta koskevia näkemyksiä tulkitaan toisinaan väärin (esimerkiksi Olat Raiyahissa, jossa on kommentoitu Malakian profetiaa ("Sitten Juudan ja Jerusalemin viljauhri on Jumalalle otollinen niin kuin muinoin ja entisinä vuosina " [Malakia 3:4]), Kook osoittaa, että vain viljauhreja tarjotaan palautetussa temppelipalvelussa, kun taas asiaan liittyvässä Igrot HaRaiyahin esseessä hän ehdottaa muuta.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 563: Uudistusjuutalaisuus ei usko keskustemppelin jälleenrakentamiseen tai temppelin uhrien tai palvonnan ennallistamiseen. Se pitää temppeli- ja uhriaikakautta primitiivisemmän rituaalimuodon ajanjaksona, josta juutalaisuus on kehittynyt ja jonka ei pitäisi palata. Se uskoo myös, että Cohenimien ja leeviläisten erityinen rooli edustaa kastijärjestelmää, joka ei ole yhteensopiva nykyaikaisten tasa-arvoperiaatteiden kanssa, eikä säilytä näitä rooleja. Lisäksi reformin näkemys on, että shul tai synagoga on moderni temppeli; siksi "temppeli" esiintyy lukuisissa seurakuntien nimissä reformijudaismissa. Synagogan nimeäminen uudelleen "temppeliksi" olikin yksi varhaisen reformin tunnusmerkeistä 1800-luvun Saksassa, kun Berliini julistettiin uudeksi Jerusalemiks ja uudistusjuutalaiset yrittivät osoittaa vankkumatonta saksalaista nationalismiaan. Antisionismi, joka luonnehti reformjutalaisuutta suuren osan sen historiasta, laantui merkittävästi holokaustin ja sitä seuranneen modernin Israelin valtion perustamisen ja myöhempien menestysten jälkeen. Usko juutalaisten paluuseen Jerusalemin temppeliin ei kuitenkaan ole osa valtavirtaa uudistettua juutalaisuutta.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 594: Sefer Zerubavel ( heprea : ספר זְרֻבָּבֶל , latinisoitu : Sēfer Zərubbāḇél ), jota kutsutaan myös Serubbaabelin kirjaksi tai Serubbaabelin apokalypsiksi, on keskiaikainen heprea - apgoypsen tyyliin kirjoitettu 1000 - luvun alussa. näyt (esim. Daniel, Hesekiel), jotka asetettiin Serubbaabelin, viimeisen Daavidin suvun jälkeläisen suuhun, joka otti merkittävän osan Israelin historiassa ja loi toisen temppelin perustan 600-luvulla eaa. Arvoituksellinen postpakolainen raamatullinen johtaja saa ilmestysnäön, jossa hahmotellaan Israelin ennallistamiseen, päivien loppuun ja kolmannen temppelin perustamiseen liittyviä henkilöitä ja tapahtumia.
    xxx/ellauri354.html on line 606: Kreikan sana täällä tulemisesta on "Parousia", joka tarkoittaa läsnäoloa. Tämä on ristiriidassa toisen sanan kanssa, jota pyhissä kirjoituksissa käytetään tulemaan "Epiphaneia", joka tarkoittaa ilmestymistä tai ilmentymistä. Parousia ehdottaa, että Hänen tulemisellaan on aikajakso ja perusteellinen tutkimus aiheesta osoittaa, että tämä ajanjakso kattaa 1260 päivää tai 3 ja puoli vuotta, joista Ilmestyskirjassa puhutaan. Emme tiedä, milloin Parousian alku alkaa, ja siksi Lordien tulo on "varkaana", (salaisesti). Tässä vaiheessa Jeesus olisi tullut ja vastaanottanut tiettyjä uskollisia. voittaa uskovat itselleen, mutta ei olisi ilmaissut itseään, joka tulee Parousian lopussa. Parousian ymmärtäminen on tärkeää, jos aiomme ymmärtää molemmat kirjeet tessalonikalaisille ja uskotella izellemme, että ne eivät ole ristiriidassa.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 114: 1970-luvulla Cixous alkoi kirjoittaa seksuaalisuuden ja häpykielen suhteesta. Cixous ja Luce Irigaray yhdistivät Derridan logosentrisen idean ja Lacanin halun symbolin (schischeli) ja loivat termin phallogosentrismi. Näppärää!
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 175: Hänet nimitettiin filosofian historian apulaisprofessoriksi École normale supérieureen Althusserin ja Jean Hyppoliten suosituksesta. Hän jatkoi tässä tehtävässä kaksikymmentä vuotta.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 184: Useaan otteeseen Derrida on tunnustanut velkansa Husserlille ja Heideggerille ja todennut, että ilman heitä hän ei olisi sanonut sanaakaan. Näissä esseissä esitettyjen kysymysten joukossa ovat "Mikä on 'merkitys', mitkä ovat sen historialliset suhteet siihen, mikä väitetään tunnistettuna "ääni"-otsikon alla läsnäolon arvoksi, esineen läsnäoloksi, läsnäolon arvoksi. merkitys tietoisuudelle, itsenäisyys niin sanotussa elävässä puheessa ja itsetietoisuudessa?" Tyypillistä idealistipotaskaa. Tämä paradigma periytyi juutalaisuudesta ja hellenismistä. Hän ​​kuvailee logosentrismiä fallokraattiseksi, patriarkaaliseksi ja maskuliniseksi.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 214: Aika pahasti Jacky ryttäsi myös vaimon spesialiteettia eli Freudin oppia. Jacques Derrida ehti kynäillä yli kahdeksankymmentä kirjaa. Vuodesta 1972 lähtien Derrida tuotti keskimäärin enemmän kuin yhden kirjan vuodessa. Derrida piti itseään historioitsijana. What a joke. Chileläinem historioizija ja Heideggerin kerta-opiskelija Farías tunnetaan parhaiten kiistellystä kirjastaan ​​Heidegger and Nazism (1987), jossa todettiin, että Heideggerin filosofia on luonnostaan ​​fasistinen. Derrida vastasi Faríasille kädenheilautuxella. Hän kutsui Faríasia heikoksi Heideggerin ajatusten lukijaksi ja lisäsi, että suuri osa Faríasin ja hänen kannattajiensa uutena mainitsemista todisteista oli jo pitkään ollut tiedossa filosofisessa yhteisössä. Juu nazihan se tunnetusti oli ja deutscher Geistin kannustaja, entä sitten? Vastavetona Derrida tulkitsee kohtia Raamatusta, erityisesti Abrahamista ja Iisakin uhrista, sekä Søren Kierkegaardin teoksesta Pelko ja vapina Las Vegasissa.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 220: Derrida ja dekonstruktio vaikuttivat estetiikkaan, kirjallisuuskritiikkaan, arkkitehtuuriin, elokuvateoriaan, antropologiaan, sosiologiaan, historiografiaan, lakiin, psykoanalyysiin, teologiaan, feminismiin, homo- ja lesbotutkimukseen ja politiikan teoriaan. Jean-Luc Nancy, Richard Rorty, Geoffrey Hartman, Harold Bloom, Rosalind Krauss, Hélène Cixous, Julia Kristeva, Duncan Kennedy, Gary Peller, Drucilla Cornell, Alan Hunt, Hayden White, Mario Kopić ja Alun Munslowin kirjailijat ovat saaneet vaikutteita dekonstruktiosta.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 282: Patriarkaalisessa kulttuurissa kynä on ymmärretty metaforisexi penixexi ja luovuuden on ymmärretty olevan luonteeltaan miehistä. Naiset sensijaan eivät yritäkään ymmärtää textiä vaan hyväilevät sitä kuin Leocadia sormenpäillä rusehtavaa valokuvaa. Eihän siitä tule lasta eikä paskaakaan.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 290: "Olen nähnyt naisten yrittävän löytää nuorista miehis

    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 316: Hän oli vasemmistolainen ja säilytti monien aikalaiskirjailijoiden tavoin aatteensa vaikka joutui karistamaan harhakuvitelmat kommunistivaltioiden kovan todellisuuden edessä. Hän oli ensimmäisiä lännen kirjailijoita, jotka kiinnittivät huomion toisen maailmansodan julmuuksiin, ja häntä voisi ehkä pitää holokaustikirjallisuuden alkuunpanijana. Mitä siltähän on suomennettu vaikka mitä! Kuis se on pysynyt näin kauan luokassa (n.h.)? "Olen esihistoriallinen mies", kuten Pulteri.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 377: Wasf on arabien runogenre, alongside 'the boast (fakhr), the invective (hijaa’), and the elegy (marthiya)'. In waṣf love poems, each part of a lover's body is described and praised in turn, often using exotic, extravagant, or even far-fetched metaphors. The Song of Solomon is a prominent example of such a poem, and other examples can be found in Thousand and One Nights. The images given in this type of poetry are not literally descriptive. Instead, they convey the delight of the lover for the beloved, where the lover finds freshness and splendor in the body as a reflected image in the world. Hilvik ei perustanut metaforista, se käytti vertauxia mieluummin.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 380:

    3 hyvistä ja 3 pahista


    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 404: Jos Amerikka on länsimaisen valkoisen sivilisaation huipentuma, kuten kaikki vasemmistosta oikeistoon julistavat, niin länsimaisessa valkoisessa sivilisaatiossa täytyy olla jotain pahasti vialla. Tämä on tuskallinen totuus; harvat meistä haluavat mennä niin pitkälle... Totuus on, että Mozart, Pascal, Boolen algebra, Shakespeare, parlamentaarinen hallitus, barokkikirkot, Newton, naisten vapautuminen, Kant, Marx, Balanchine-baletit jne. eivät lunasta sitä, mitä tämä tietty sivilisaatio on saanut aikaan maailmalle. Valkoinen rotu on ihmiskunnan historian syöpä; se on valkoinen rotu ja se yksin - sen ideologiat ja keksinnöt - joka hävittää autonomiset sivilisaatiot kaikkialla, missä ne leviävät, mikä on horjuttanut planeetan ekologista tasapainoa, mikä nyt uhkaa itse elämän olemassaoloa.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 440: Elokuun 27. päivänä tytär Ariadne pidätettiin ja Efron pidätettiin 10. lokakuuta. 16. lokakuuta 1941 Sergei Jakovlevich ammuttiin Lubjankassa (muiden lähteiden mukaan Orjolin keskuskeskuksessa); Ariadne kunnostettiin vuonna 1955 viidentoista vuoden vankilassa ja maanpaossa. Tänä aikana Tsvetaeva ei käytännössä kirjoittanut runoutta, vaan teki käännöksiä. Sota löysi Tsvetajevan kääntämässä Federico Garcia Lorcaa. Työ keskeytettiin. 8. elokuuta, Tsvetaeva ja hänen poikansa lähtivät veneellä evakuointiin; Kahdeksantoista päivänä hän saapui useiden kirjailijoiden kanssa Elabugan kaupunkiin Kaman varrella. Chistopolissa, jossa enimmäkseen evakuoidut kirjailijat sijaitsivat, Tsvetaeva sai suostumuksen rekisteröintiin ja jätti lausunnon: "Kirjallisuusrahaston neuvostolle. Pyydän teitä palkkaamaan minut astianpesukoneeksi Kirjallisuusrahaston avausruokalaan. 26. elokuuta 1941". Pyyntö hylättiin. 31. elokuuta 1941 hän teki itsemurhan (hirtti itsensä) Brodelštšikovien talossa, jonne hänet ja hänen poikansa määrättiin arestiin. Hän jätti kolme itsemurhaviestiä. Runonäyte Tsvetajevalta:
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 463: Nojautuen ranskalaiseen perinteeseen, joka kuhisee hirviömäisiä tyyppejä (esim. kirjailija Louis-Ferdinand Célineä ), ja hämmentäen aihetta, joka perustuu "likaan" (esim. keittiöpsykoanalyytikko Jacques Lacan), Julia Kristeva kehitti ajatuksen "abjekti" sellaisexi, jonka sosiaalinen järki hylkää kun se häiritsee yhteisöllistä konsensusta, joka tukee yhteiskuntajärjestystä. "Abjekti" esiintyy vastenmielisesti jossain objektin ja subjektin välissä, edustaen minän tabuelementtejä kuten esim. runkkuisia kyrpiä ja perseitä, jotka ovat tuskin seipäällä erotettavissa toisistaan. Kristeva väittää, että subjektiksi määritellyn – osaksi itseäsi – ja objektin – itsestäsi riippumattoman olemassa olevan – rajamailla on palasia, jotka on kerran luokiteltu osaksi itseään tai identiteettiä, mutta jotka on sittemmin hylätty – abjekteja. Kristevan abjection-käsitettä käytetään yleisesti analysoimaan suosittuja kulttuurisia kertomuksia kauhusta ja syrjivästä käyttäytymisestä, joka ilmenee naisvihana, homofobiana ja kansanmurhina. Kriittisessä teoriassa abjektio ("hylky/heittiömäisyys") on tila, jossa ollaan erossa normeista ja säännöistä, erityisesti yhteiskunnan ja moraalin tasolla. Termiä on tutkittu poststrukturalismissa sellaisena, joka luonnostaan häiritsee tavanomaista ranskalaista kermaperse identiteettiä ja kulttuurisia käsitteitä.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 486: Tämä Louis-Ferdinand Céline -tyyliä apinoiva romaani analysoi muun muassa feminismin seurauksia sekä historian poliittisia ja taiteellisia mullistuksia amerikkalaisen toimittajan seikkailunhaluisen elämän kautta. Valtaa ja seksuaalisuutta tutkitaan ja paljastetaan pylly väitöskirjan pohjalta: ”Maailma kuuluu naisille. Eli kuolemaan. Kaikki valehtelevat siitä."
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 488: 26. tammikuuta 1977, Sollers allekirjoitti Le Mondessa – hän plus noin viisikymmentä persoonaa – (erityisesti Jean-Paul Sartren, Roland Barthesin, Simone de Beauvoirin, Alain Robbe-Grillet'n, Françoise Doltin ja Jacques Derridan kanssa) "Avoimen kirjeen rikoslain tarkistuskomissiolle tiettyjen lakitekstien tarkistamiseksi, aikuiset ja alaikäiset", jossa vaaditaan, että "alaikäisten väärinkäyttöä" koskevat lain artiklat "kumotaan tai muutetaan perusteellisesti" siinä mielessä, että "lapsen ja nuoren oikeus tunnustetaan ylläpitää suhteita valitsemiinsa ihmisiin." Se oli vetoomus kolmen miehen puolesta, joita syytettiin 15-vuotiaiden alaikäisten sopimattomasta pahoinpitelystä ilman väkivaltaa. Tämän tekstin oli kirjoittanut Gabriel Matzneff, joka ei salaa makuaan pedofiliaa ja efebofiliaa kohtaan. Matzneff kerskui nussineensa useitakin alaikäisiä tyttöjä. Helmikuussa 2020 julkaistussa New York Timesin profiilissa valokuvassa Matzneff seisoo yksin veden äärellä Italiassa, näyttää masentuneelta, surullinen kalju mies Burberryn trenssitakissa. Ämmä Springora tuhosi muiston siitä, mitä hän muistaa olleen "kestävä ja upea rakkaustarina". Mutta voiko teini-ikäisellä tytöllä olla "upea rakkaustarina" yli kolme kertaa häntä ikäisemmän henkilön kanssa? Tämä on Consentin ytimessä oleva kysymys. Lukijat eivät epäile vastauksesta mitään. This manner willl be convenient for a man who wants to enjoy a woman, and can only get at her by force and against her will. (Perfumed Garden, p. 72.)
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 493: Samaan aikaan hän piti yli 50 vuoden ajan suhdetta belgialaiseen kirjailijaan Dominique Roliniin (1913-2012). Vuonna 2013 hän julkaisi Naispotretteja -kirjan, jossa hän kertoo äidistään Julia Kristevasta, Dominique Rolinista sekä prostituoiduista ja muista historiallisista henkilöistä.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 538: Vaan eka säkeistö julkaistiin, ja sitä yleensä vain siteerataankin. Clemens Brentanon mielestä se oli aivan parhautta, the cat's whiskers elegioiden joukossa.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 550: 10Immerquillend und frisch rauschen an duftendem Beet. Aina virtaa ja kahisee raikkaasti tuoksuvalla laitumella.
    xxx/ellauri356.html on line 588: Holderlin ei puhu historiaan pettyneille, vaan "Jumalan abjekteille". Hän panee merkille historiallisen hengellisen romahduksen, transsendenssin pimennyksen, ja hän vastaa siihen tällä hämmästyttävän yksinkertaisella kaavalla: "Eläminen on muotojen puolustamista" (1804); ja kolme vuotta myöhemmin hän asetti runoilijoille mittaamattoman tehtävän: "Runoilijat löysivät sen, mikä oli jäänyt aidalle" (vrt. Souvenir/ Andenken, 1803). Runous kreikkalaisten jumaluuksien korvikkeena, evankelikaalisen juorutuksen, Koraanin läpimurron korvikkeena? Sietämätön vaatimus! Tästäkö johtuu huolestunut sävy: miksi? mitä järkeä?
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 64: Luurankomaisen laiha rokonarpinen Hannu Sivenius oli 70-luvun alussa muistaaxeni kova kommari, lie sekin sittemmin kääntänyt takkinsa. Heideggerin kansallissosialistinen seikkailu ja siihen liittyvät yleiset kysymykset ajattelijan vastuusta ovatkin tavan takaa puhuttaneet yleistä kulttuurista keskustelua Suomessa. Kysymys on vaikea ja vailla valmista vastausta, mutta varmaa on, ettei tämä tahra Heideggerin henkilöhistoriassa vähennä hänen ajatteluunsa kohdistuvaa kiinnostusta tai halua etsiä sitä, mikä tuossa ajattelussa on kestävää ja Heideggerin omat mahdolliset puutteet ylittävää. Tarmo Kunnas totesi ilahtuneena 2004, että Heidegger on ”lopultakin tullut uskottavaksi ajattelijaksi maassamme”. Näyttääkin todella hieman paradoksaalisesti siltä, että siinä missä perinteinen ”heideggerilaisuus” on vanhoilla kanta-alueillaan Saksassa ja Ranskassa jonkinlaisessa laskusuhdanteessa, elävät fenomenologia ja mannermainen filosofia ”kukoistuskauttaan” perinteisesti analyyttisissä filosofisissa kulttuureissa, erityisesti Yhdysvalloissa ja Pohjoismaissa. Nazismi alkoi trendata anglosaxi länkkäreissä 9/11 insidentin perästä. Uusi viholliskuva, kokardittomat etniset rättipää terroristit, korvas entiset nukkavierut koppalakkiset. Ei koppalakeissa oikeastaan olekaan mitään vikaa. Niiden takana leviää länttä ja Eurooppaa, varjelen vartija sitä.
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 83: historian luennot ja S. Albert Kivisen kurssi ontologiasta. Jo lukioaikana olin törmännyt Kivisen
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 126: reach this level of success, Pia had to take some major
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 142: Ever since making this decision, Pia hasn’t looked back.
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 145: online celebrity in the process. This is her story:
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 405: Yli 25 vuotta sitten joku WJT Mitchell toivoi, että tulevaisuudessa kriitikot kiinnittäisivät huomiota "vaaralliseen… ilkeään… likaiseen" Blakeen, jonka aikaisemmat tutkijat desinfioivat "turvallisesti pyhitetyksi" tehdessään, ja hänen teostensa asianmukaiseen tutkimiseen ammattilaisvoimin. (Mitchell 1982, 410, 411, 414). Profeetallisten pohdiskelujensa aikana Mitchell tunnisti blakelaisen seksuaalisen siveettömyyden paksun sarjan, joka otti usein hyvin outoja muotoja, ja vaikka nyt onkin epämiellyttävää nähdä hänen paimentavan homoseksuaalista fellatiota, naisellisuutta ja lesbovoyeurismia yhdessä raiskauksen, himon ja sadomasokismin kanssa sinkkuna (lika) "epänormaalin seksuaalisuuden" banneri, hänen paljastamansa elävät – heteroseksuaalisuutta hämmentävät – kohtaukset (414) tekivät kohtuulliseksi olettaa, että kun queer saapui sisään kylmästä, Blake Studies toivottaisi sille lämpimän vastaanoton. Tuon vuosikymmenen lopulla Camille Paglian (1990) karu kuvaus Blakesta "British Sade" (270) ehdotti varmasti samanlaista kriittistä tulevaisuutta. Hänen ilmestymisensä runoilijasta saattaa vapista ja iskeä "suuren äidin" alla, mutta edipaalinen terrori antaa myös outoa ymmärrystä, sillä "Blaken kauhistuttava kohtalo oli nähdä kuilu, josta useimmat miehet väistyvät: infantilismi kaikessa miesten heteroseksuaaluudessa" (287). Ja 1990-luvulla omituisia pilkkuja välähti toisinaan sukupuolitutkimuksesta, varsinkin sellaisesta, joka yritti hypätä tiiliseinää vastaan, johon feministinen kritiikki oli törmännyt yrittäessään tuomita Blaken "naisvihaa".
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 455: Maaliskuussa 1814 Shelley meni uudelleen naimisiin Harrietin kanssa Lontoossa ratkaistakseen epäilykset heidän Edinburghissa pidettyjen häiden laillisuudesta ja turvatakseen heidän lapsensa oikeudet. Siitä huolimatta Shelleyt asuivat erillään suurimman osan seuraavista kuukausista, ja Shelley pohti katkerasti "ihottumaani ja sydämetöntä liittoni Harrietin kanssa".
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 507: 1. heinäkuuta 1822 Shelley ja Edward Williams purjehtivat Shelleyn uudella veneellä Don Juanilla Livornoon, missä Shelley tapasi Leigh Huntin ja Byronin sopiakseen uuden The Liberal -lehden julkaisemisesta. Kokouksen jälkeen 8. heinäkuuta Shelley, Williams ja heidän venepoikansa purjehtivat Livornosta Lericiin. Muutamaa tuntia myöhemmin Don Juan ja sen kokematon miehistö katosivat myrskyssä. Alus, avoin vene, oli räätälöity Genovassa Shelleylle. Mary Shelley julisti kirjassaan "Note on Poems of 1822" (1839), että suunnittelussa oli vika ja että vene ei koskaan ollut merikelpoinen. Uppoaminen johtui kuitenkin luultavasti kovasta myrskystä ja aluksella olleiden kolmen miehen huonosta meritaidosta.
    xxx/ellauri358.html on line 76: PG | 105 min | Draamaa, historiaa, romantiikkaa

    xxx/ellauri358.html on line 108: Catherinen ja Heathcliffin rakkaus edustaa yhtä kuhisevimmista - ja karmaisevimmista - yhden ja saman rakkauden avauksista lansimaisessa kirjallisuudessa. Kasvinkumppalit ovat kasvaneet yhdeksi ja samaksi eikä tätä tolaa voi mikään male maailmassa muuksi muuttaa. Kysymys onkin enaa siita, osaavatkohan ne nyt elaa uskollisina yhteiselle olemukselleen. Vaikka Cather rhylkää Heathcliffin han tietää heidän olevan samaa ainesta, viimeistään kirstussa, jossa molemmista tulee humusta.
    xxx/ellauri358.html on line 237: läpi bakteereja kuhisevien merien.
    xxx/ellauri358.html on line 295: Samaan aikaan epävarmuus ja kilpailu sekä nuorille asetetut vaatimukset työelämätaidoista, tavoitteista ja elämäntyylistä ovat vain lisääntyneet. Pitää niiata hövelisti asiakasrajapinnassa. Möröille on enää volttipolkupyöräduuneja. Valkoisen miehen, varsinkin kouluttamattoman, asema on ensimmäistä kertaa luonnonhistoriassa uhattuna, Rasmus pahoittelee.
    xxx/ellauri361.html on line 218: William Jamesin mielestä tää ja Doston Karamazovit oli "lapsellisia". Neuvostokriitikot näki siinä "pirstoutumista ja päättelyn puutetta." Brian Aldiss kuzui sitä suurimmaksi Tolstoin romaaniksi. Pötyä, Sota ja Rauha on paljon paxumpi. Kenji Mizoguchi sanoi: "Kaikki melodraama perustuu Tolstoin ylösnousemukseen." Mitä tollanen japsu filminikkari nyt ylipäänsä ymmärtää. Hänen elokuviensa toistuva teema oli naisten sortaminen historiallisessa ja nykypäivän Japanissa.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 85: Born on February 11, 1900, in Marburg, in Southern Germany, Gadamer grew up in Breslau (now Wroclaw in Poland), where his father was Professor of Pharmacy at the University of Breslau, later taking the Chair of Pharmaceutical Chemistry at Marburg.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 87: In 1949 Gadamer was asked to succeed Karl Jaspers as chair at the University of Heidelberg, where he would spend the remainder of h!s academic career. After his divorce from Frida Kratz, Gadamer marned his second wife Kate Lekebusch, in 1950. In 1953, Gadamer founded the scholarly journal 'Philosophische Rundschau, with Kate leading the editorial business. "Under her direction, it became one of the 7 best philosophical Journals in postwar Germany," according to Jean Grondin.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 93: Gadamer published Truth and Method in 1960 at age sixty, devoting an entire decade to its writing. Due to the significance of this project and the length of time involved in its production, it seems appropriate to provide some insight into Gadamer's life-world during the creation of this important work. According to biographer Jean Grondin, "in Frankfurt [in the late 1940s] Gadamer was being urged by students (not to mention contemptuous colleagues) to produce, at long last, a substantial piece of work. Although he felt unprepared to take on such a project, he wrote the work while at Heidelberg in the 1950s at the encouragement of his wife Kate (27-77-80)."
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 101: Gadamerin työn voidaan nähdä keskittyneenä neljälle pääalueelle: ensimmäinen ja selvästi vaikuttavin on filosofisen hermeneutiikan kehittäminen ja jalostaminen; toinen on dialogi filosofian sisällä ja filosofian historian sisällä erityisesti Platonin ja Aristoteleen, mutta myös Hegelin ja Heideggerin välillä; kolmas on koukuttuminen kirjallisuuteen, erityisesti runouteen, ja taiteeseen; ja neljäs on se, mitä Gadamer itse kutsuu "käytännön filosofiaksi" (Gadamer 2001, 78–85), joka kattaa E.Saarisen elämäntyön tavoin kaikki nykyajan poliittiset ja eettiset kysymykset.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 138:

    Wilhon kolleega Tshingshis


    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 143: Lähetysseuran työn alkuaikoina Ambomaalla oli liikaa työmiehiä ja liian vähän eloa, kustannus/pelastussuhde huono, joten kazeet kääntyivät Kiinan suuntaan. Mantshuria oli ryssillä, mutta boksarit kukistettua päästiin muukalaisvihamieliseen Hunaniin. Ensimmäinen Kiinan-lähetystyöntekijä oli Hannes Sjöblom, joka valmistui papiksi vuonna 1900. Vaimo Ellen seurasi miestään työalueelle. 100v myöh. Sjöblomin jälkeläinen kiltti Matti Keijola kuoli virzarakon syöpään vähän äkkiä. Pani miettimään näenköhän enää ensi kesää ja Rauhista.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 145: Sjöblom aloitti tutustumismatkat Jangtsen sivuhaaran Li-joen alueelle. Joulukuussa 1902 hän saapui Jinshiin, jota hän ehdotti työn keskuspaikaksi. Runsaan vuoden kuluttua Sjöblomien saapumisesta Jinshissä vietettiin kristillisen seurakunnan perustamisjuhlaa. Avoimet työmahdollisuudet innostivat lähetystyöntekijöitä. Kirkot olivat auki joka päivä aamusta iltaan, ja ohikulkijoilla oli mahdollisuus poiketa sisään koska tahansa.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 151: Jinshissä avattiin poikakoulu vuonna 1903. Tyttöjen koulutuksessa Lähetysseura oli edelläkävijänä: Ellen Sjöblom aloitti tyttöjen opetuksen Jinshissä 1906. Tyttökoulu herätti seudulla hämmästystä ja epäluuloa. Kiinalaisilla oli tuohon aikaan piintynyt käsitys, että tytöt eivät opi mitään. Tyttöjen paikka oli lattialla. Koulutyö menestyi kuitenkin hyvin, ja kymmenen vuotta myöhemmin oppilaita oli yhteensä jo 1200.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 184: historioitsija ja huuhaafilosofi Michel Foucault’n (1926 – 1984) analyysi. Eurooppalaisen vankilalaitoksen ja rangaistuskäytännön historiaa käsittelevässä teoksessaan Tarkkailla ja rangaista
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 288: Vangit edustivat pääasiassa yhteiskunnan alimpia kerroksia, joten yhteiskunnallinen valistustyö oli vankilassa perusteltua. Moraalinen painotus näkyi esimerkiksi historian opetuksessa, jossa menneisyys tuli esittää paha saa palkkansa -periaatteen mukaisesti. Yhteiskuntaopissa puolestaan tuli
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 341: otettiin uudelleen käyttöön. Lopullisesti fyysinen pakko siirtyi Lapinlahdessa historiaan
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 615: historiaa. Siis materialismia. Se on sentään jotakin. Ellin mielestä nää kuvat oli vähän niinkö graffiteja, joka neliösentti käytettiin. Toisaalta toisinnon teknologia tuki vankisairaalan hoitokulttuuria, sillä se mahdollisti potilaan liikkumatilan hallitun säännöstelyn. Toisinto oli keino tuottaa kahlitsevaa vapautta. Vihaava rakkaus, rakastava viha. Jäätävä polte etc. Mä muistan nää, ne oli oxymooroneita! Niinkö liberaali taloustiede.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 661: Bentham oli harvinainen päähenkilö filosofian historiassa kannattamassa yhtä aikaa psykologista egoismia ja ateismia. Psykologinen egoismi on näkemys, jonka mukaan ihmisiä motivoi aina oma edun tavoittelu ja itsekkyys, jopa sellaisissakin, jotka näyttävät olevan altruismia. Se väittää, että kun ihmiset päättävät auttaa muita, he tekevät niin viime kädessä henkilökohtaisten etujen vuoksi, joita he itse odottavat saavansa siitä suoraan tai epäsuorasti. Tunnetuimpia psykologisia egoisteja ovat Sextus Empiricus, Pierre Bayle ja Bernard Mandeville. Oman sydämen täyteydestä Jerryn suu puhui.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 679: Hänen varakas perheensä tuki Tory-puoluetta. Hän oli kuulemma ihmelapsi: hänet löydettiin taaperona istumassa isänsä pöydän ääressä lukemassa moniosaista Englannin historiaa, ja hän aloitti latinan opiskelun kolmen vuoden ikäisenä.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 682: During his youthful visits to Bowood House, the country seat of his patron Lord Lansdowne, he had passed his time at falling unsuccessfully in love with all the ladies of the house, whom he courted with a clumsy jocularity, while playing chess with them or giving them lessons on the harpsichord. Hopeful to the last, at the age of eighty he wrote again to one of them, recalling to her memory the far-off days when she had "presented him, in ceremony, with the flower in the green lane".
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 717: Saksalainen filosofi Wilhelm Dilthey (1833–1911) on yksi modernin tai ainakin filosofisen hermeneutiikan perustajista. Hän on tärkeä välittäjä siinä henkitieteiden tiedollista perustaa tutkivassa filosofian traditiossa, jonka ensimmäisiä edustajia olivat Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768–1834) ja Johann Gustav Droysen (1808–1884), ja jota Filthy Diltheyn jälkeen 1900-luvulla kehittivät edelleen Martin "nazi" Heidegger (1889–1976), Hans-Georg "humanisti vastoin isän toiveita" Gadamer (1900–2002) ja Paul "ranu" Ricoeur (1913–2005). Dilthey kutsui filosofista projektiaan terveen järjen kritiikiksi. Hän katsoi, että Immanuel Kantin kriittinen filosofia (ks. "Kant: Puhtaan järjen kritiikki") ei antanut vastausta historiallisten tieteiden tiedollisiin ongelmiin, ja halusi siksi täydentää Kantin filosofiaa erityisesti kokemuksen transvestiittisten ehtojen osalta.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 719: Dilthey ilmoitti jo vuonna 1860 aikovansa kirjoittaa uuden puhtaan järjen kritiikin, joka perustuisi historiallis-kielitieteellisen osaston maailmankatsomukselle. Transufilosofia säilyi Diltheyn käsitteellisenä viitekehyksenä läpi hänen filosofisen uransa, ei se siitä päässyt eroon enempää kuin rupikonna täplistä. Hänen filosofinen projektinsa kesti yli viisikymmentä vuotta, mutta mitään valmista historiallisen järjen kritiikistä hän ei saanut kirjoitetuksi. Sen sijaan historiallisen järjen kritiikki on luettavissa erilaisine kehittelyvaiheineen siinä mittavassa tuotannossa erilaisia tekeleitä, jotka hän elämänsä aikana kirjoitti. Diltheyn filosofista tuotantoa tarkasteltaessa on hyvä muistaa hänen ajatelleen – Karl Marxia mukaillen – että filosofian tehtävä ei ole selittää maailmaa vaan muuttaa sitä. No paljonpa se sai sitä muutetuxi. Tämän toiminnallisen lähtökohdan kautta myös hänen filosofinen hajanaisuutensa tulee parhaiten ymmärretyksi.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 721: Dilthey syntyi Biebrichissä lähellä Mainzia pappisperheeseen, jossa harrastettiin paljon kulttuuria, erityisesti kirkkomusiikkia ja suositeltavaa kirjallisuutta. Teologian opinnot eivät kuitenkaan tyydyttäneet Diltheyta, ja hän vaihtoi ne filosofiaan Berliinin yliopistossa. Dilthey väitteli tohtoriksi Berliinissä 1864. Historialliset opinnot ja filosofia vieraannuttivat hänet uskonnosta. Äidilleen hän kirjoitti, että häntä riivasi tiedonjano, jota papan uskonto ei voi tyydyttää. Hänen kiinnostuksensa uskontoa kohtaan kuitenkin säilyi läpi elämän, samoin kuin jonkinlainen romantikoilta omaksuttu pantyhose maailmankatsomus. Hänen lukeneisuutensa määrä oli miltei käsittämätön, tosin ei se lukemastaan paljon muistanut. Hän kirjoitti paasauxia filosofian historiasta Spinozasta Wolffiin ja Kantiin, Schellingistä Comteen ja Schopenhaueriin, Schleiermacherista Nietzscheen. Multa puuttuu vielä muutama, ainakin Wolff ja Comte. Baselissa (eräänlainen Kouvola) hän kirjoitti suurtyötään Schleiermacherin elämäkertaa sekä tärkeitä tekeleitä kuten Goethe und die dichterische Phantasie ja merkittävään kulttuurifilosofiseen esseekokoelmaansa Das Erlebnis und die Dichtung.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 725: Päästäxeen Berliiniin Hegelin tuoliin istumaan Filthy viimeisteli pikavauhtia valmiiksi historiallisen järjen kritiikin ensimmäisen osan ja julkaisi sen nimellä Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Joku muukin teki tälläsen hätäpaskan viranhakumielessä, julkaisi osan I eikä saanut osaa II koskaan valmiixi, kuka? Oliko se vallan "nazi" Heideggerin Sein und Zeit? On epäselvää, miksi hän vaihtoi tutkimuksensa alkuperäisen nimen vaatimattomammaksi nimeksi Johdatus hengentieteisiin, vaikka hän itse viittasi siihen aina myöhemmin nimellä Historiallisen järjen kritiikki. Kreivi Warttenburg kai varoitti. Tutkimus kaikkine puutteineen sai valitsijat vakuuttuneiksi Diltheyn kyvyistä systemaattisena filosofina (muut hakijat olivat peruuttaneet) ja hänet nimitettiin vuonna 1882 filosofian professoriksi Berliinin yliopistoon, jossa hän työskentelee tyytyväisenä vielä tänäänkin, ellei ole kuollut.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 727: Diltheyn filosofinen projekti on niin laaja-alainen, monitasoinen ja fragmentaarinen, että siitä on vaikea saada otetta. Suoraan sanottuna vyyhdestä ei löydy päätä eikä häntääkään. Ei ole helppoa erottaa hänen omia (jos niitä oli) ja muilta omaksumia ajatuksiaan (sic). Erna kertaa possessiivisuffixit! Diltheyn sekavuuteen turhautuneet oppilaat kuzuivat häntä "mystisexi vanhaxi käppyräxi". Pääasia oli jankata, ettei luonnontieteiden tiedollisia lähtökohtia määrittävä positivistinen tieteenihanne ole sellaisenaan sovellettavissa hengentieteisiin. Comte pirulainen oli perivihollinen, niinkuin historiallis-kielitieteellisessä osastossa 70-luvulla. Ilmeisesti Wolff ei ollut paljon parempi. Hengentieteisiin tarvitaan uskonnollisempaa otetta. Nazit eivät perustaneet Filthystä, vaikka kummatkin kannustivat Herderiä. Herder vaati filosofiaan ”kopernikaanista vallankumousta”, joka asettaa ihmisen filosofisen tutkimuksen keskiöön. Dilthey pyrki erottamaan sen, mikä on sisällämme, siitä, mikä on ulkopuolellamme. (Entäpä se, joka on vuoroon sisällä vuoroon ulkona?) Diltheyn psykologian kohteeksi asettui historiallinen, yksilöllinen kokemus, itselle-oleminen, eletty kokemus ja elämä. Dilthey korostaa, että subjektiivisuus on moderni tapa tarkastella asioita.
    xxx/ellauri363.html on line 754: Nuorena teini-ikäisenä toinen maailmansota vaikutti Jyrkiin syvästi. Lukion valmistumiseen asti Habermas asui Gummersbachissa Kölnin lähellä . Hänen isänsä Ernst Habermas oli Kölnin teollisuuspamppuja. Jyrki kuvaili häntä osuvasti natsien kannattajaksi ja vuodesta 1933 natsipuolueen NSDAP:n jäseneksi. Jyrki itse oli Jungvolkführer, saksalaisen Jungvolkin johtaja, joka kuului Hitlerjugendiin. Aika noloa. Hänet kasvatettiin vankkumattomassa protestanttisessa miljöössä, sillä hänen isoisänsä oli Gummersbachin seminaarin johtaja. Hän suoritti filosofian tohtorin tutkinnon Bonnissa vuonna 1954 väitöskirjalla, jossaa kirjoitettiin absoluutin ja "absoluutin" välisestä konfliktista Schellingin ajattelussa, Jakkoh-Hintikka sentään todisti jotain 2. kl logiikan ilmaisuvoimasta. Habilitaatiovaiheessa tuli riitaa Horkheimerin kanssa Frankfurtin koulussa, ja Jyrki painui iänikuiseen Marburgiin. Hannu-Jori hommasi sille henk.koht. ylim. professorin paikan Heidelbergistä. 1964 Jyrki kosti Horkheimerille potut pottuina ja vei sen tyhjentämän tuolin Frankfurtin koulussa.
    xxx/ellauri366.html on line 63: Ja sitten taas Rimman luoxi! Kun lapset pelästyivät herra Huu kasvoi 20cm lisää pituutta. Se aivan röyhistyi. Rimma lähestyi uhkaavasti. Herra Huu kutistui nopeasti yhtä pienexi kuin ennenkin. Herra Huu ojensi kalikkansa ja Rimma puristi sitä. Aii, herra Huu huusi, sillä se teki kipeää. Rimma pudotti kalikan ja alkoi nyyhkyttää. Samassa alkoi kalikka kasvaa ja muuttaa muotoaan. Mikähän siitä tulisi? (Kz. Fig 1.) Hyvä ettei siitä tullut käärmettä.
    xxx/ellauri366.html on line 273: Venäjällä kovat puheet Puolustus­voimien historial­lisesta Nato-harjoituksesta: ”Suomesta ei jää mitään jäljelle, kun Nato-joukot jyrää mökkipalstat kumoon vanhanaikaisilla tankeilla."
    xxx/ellauri366.html on line 275: Panssarivaunut mylläsivät Villen yksityistien ”mahdottoman huonoon kuntoon” – Näin kommentoi Puolustus­voimat: e-e-e-e-emme kommentoi. Pornotähden pojasta tuli yleisurheilija – Sai isältään ronskin neuvon. Tällaisen korvauksen lakkoilijat saavat. Ruotsista tuli Naton jäsen. Miehellä oli mämmit housuissa porilaisessa kaupassa. Räjähdyksiä Tukholman lähistöllä – 4 pidätettyä. Presidentti Stubb: ”Osa tätä harjoitusta on varmistaa, että Venäjä voisi hyökätä”.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 62: Hannu Salama was born 1936 in Kouvola, Kymenlaakso region in Southern Finland. Figures. He spent his childhood in the Pispala district of the city of Tampere, in a traditional working-class area with working class politics and culture. Following in the footsteps of his father, Salama first worked as an electrician and a farm hand. Tollaset kynäilijät on ihmisinä aivan perseenreijästä.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 82: Jean Genetin esimerkistä hän allekirjoitti 1951 kolmen vuoden armeijasitoumuksen ajatuksella, että hyvällä onnella hänet tapetaan Indokiinassa. No such luck. Kaksi kuukautta kadettiryhmässä 32. tykistörykmentin 8. pataljoonassa Wittlichissä paljasti hänelle hänen fyysisen kyvyttömyytensä, vaikka hän vain kokoaisi kiväärin. Liikkeet mudassa, vartijat lumen alla, pakotetut marssit kolmenkymmenen kilon paketin kanssa paransivat hänet alkuinnostuksestaan, mutta hän säilytti ihailunsa armeijaa, sen ammattikorkeakoulua ja sen tekniikkaa kohtaan. Tulee mirleen Philip Rothin armeija-ajat perunateatterissa. Kanuunan ääni aiheutti pysyvän kuulovaurion oikeaan korvaan. Ransu tunaroi asekuljetuxia, karkaa ruodusta ja nirhii putkassa taas naamaa partaveizellä.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 125: 18. lokakuuta 1974 Greenin tyttöystävä Mary Woodson hyökkäsi hänen kimppuunsa ja kuoli sitten itsemurhaan hänen Memphisin kodissaan. Vaikka Greenin tietämättä hän oli jo naimisissa ja hänellä oli kolme lasta, Woodson suuttui, kun Green kieltäytyi naimasta hiäntä. Hiän kasteli hänet kattilalla kiehuvia rouheita, kun hän valmistautui nukkumaan kylpyhuoneessa, aiheuttaen toisen asteen palovammoja hänen selkään, vatsaan ja käsivarsiin, jotka vaativat ihosiirteitä. Pian tämän jälkeen Woodson ampui itsensä tappavasti .38-käsiaseellaan. Poliisi löysi ilmeisesti Greenin käsialalla kirjoitetun itsemurhaviestin Woodsonin laukusta, jossa kerrottiin hänen aikeistaan ja syistä. Muutama päivä aikaisemmin Green oli lähettänyt Woodsonin toipumaan ystävänsä kotiin sen jälkeen, kun tämä oli ottanut kourallisen unilääkkeitä ja viiltoja ranteeseensa. Green mainitsi tämän tapauksen herätyksenä muuttaa hänen elämänsä. Paljonpa se muuttuikin! Ei kuitenkaan niin paljon kuin Woodsonin. Woodsonin suikki oli jumalan varoitus Al Greenelle.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 127: 15. kesäkuuta 1977 Green meni naimisiin ensimmäisen vaimonsa Shirley Greenin (os Kyles) kanssa Memphisissä. Hiän oli alunperin Chicagosta, ja hiän oli yksi hänen taustalaulajistaan ja työntekijä hänen kirkossaan. Heillä on yhdessä kolme tytärtä. Shirley haki ensimmäisen kerran avioeroa vuonna 1978 julmuuden ja sovittamattomien erimielisyyksien perusteella. Hiän jätti hakemuksen uudelleen vuonna 1981 syyttämällä Greenin kohdistaneen hänet perheväkivaltaa koko avioliiton ajan. Green syytti hiäntä julmasta ja epäinhimillisestä kohtelusta vastavalitteessa. Vuonna 1982 antamassaan vannomassaan avioerohakemuksessaan Shirley todisti, että Green hakkasi hiäntä saappaalla vuonna 1978 ollessaan raskaana viidennellä kuukaudella, koska hän kieltäytyi seksistä. Hän väitti, että pahoinpitely johti pään haavoihin, joista yksi vaati ompeleita. Tapahtuman jälkeen hän haki avioeroa, mutta he tekivät sovinnon. Shirleyn mukaan he erosivat useita kertoja, kun pahoinpitelyt tulivat "liian usein ja liian ankariksi". Aluksi Green kielsi hakkailleensa vaimoaan, mutta vuonna 1982 hän myönsi lyöneensä vaimoaan. Heidän avioeronsa saatiin päätökseen helmikuussa 1983. Pot pot pot pot potkun sain, kesken hakkailua, valitti Shirley.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 129: Greenin entinen sihteeri Linda Wills nosti 25 000 dollarin siviilikanteen häntä vastaan vuonna 1974. Wills syytti Greenin hakkaamisesta ja työntämisestä lasioven läpi Memphisin toimistossaan sen jälkeen, kun Linda oli oikeutettu saamaan palkkaa tehtävistään.Vuonna 1978 Green sai syytteen päällekäynnistä ja pahoinpitelystä, koska hänen väitettiin hakkaamasta Lovie Smithiä tajuttomaksi puun oksalla. Alin studio albumit ovat yxin tein lukien alla. Nähtävästi 80-luku meni gospelina, sitten jatkui naisten mätkintä.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 163: Parkerin arvion mukaan se, mikä todella tappoi Elvisin, ei ollut hänen sydänkohtauksensa tai huumeisiin liittyvä itsemurha, kuten jotkut uskovat, vaan pikemminkin rakkaus faneihinsa. Samaan aikaan Parker kuolee myös köyhänä ja yksin sairaalassa pelattuaan loput väärin hankituista omaisuuksistaan. Elvis Presley on edelleen historian myydyin sodomisti.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 274: Mauprat est un roman historique publié en 1837. L'histoire se déroule pour la majeure partie dans le Berry à l'aube de la Révolution française au XVIIIe siècle. Il relate l'histoire d'un jeune garçon issu d'une famille de seigneurs cruels, les Mauprat, qui échappe peu à peu à son lourd héritage familial grâce à l'amour qu'il éprouve pour sa cousine Edmée, nettement plus civilisée que lui. L'œuvre recèle plusieurs aspects: si Mauprat est avant tout un roman d'amour et une histoire de famille, c'est aussi un roman politique, une fable philosophique et un manifeste féminin.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 281: Au début du roman, Bernard est présenté comme un personnage détestable, un véritable voyou sans scrupules. Il est élevé dans une famille de brigands et est un con. Cependant, au fil de l’histoire, nous assistons à sa transformation profonde, alors qu’il est confronté à l’amour et à la bienveillance de la belle Edmée de Mauprat. Bernard devient ainsi le symbole de la rédemption, luttant contre ses instincts les plus sombres pour devenir un homme meilleur.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 283: Edmée de Mauprat, quant à elle, est une jeune femme noble et vertueuse. Son personnage est empreint de douceur et de détermination, faisant d’elle un personnage féminin fort et inspirant. Leurs histoires entrelacées de passion et de rédemption nous tiennent en haleine, nous invitant à réfléchir sur la nature humaine et sur la possibilité de changer et de se racheter. Lunastusta kehiin taas. Vizi moraali on yhtä kaupanhierontaa.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 285: Un véritable chef-d’œuvre de la littérature qui continue de fasciner les lecteurs aujourd’hui. D’autres l’ont critiquée pour sa complexité narrative et ses personnages peu convaincants. Certains lecteurs, y compris Poline, ont également trouvé que le roman était trop long, avec des passages qui semblaient superflus et qui ralentissaient le rythme de l’histoire.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 460: Ronald Hingley, author of Russians and Society and a specialist in Dostoevsky´s works, thought this novel a bad one, whereas Richard Pevear (in the introduction to his and Larissa Volokhonsky´s 2003 translation of the novel), vigorously said it´s a good one. Herman Hesse, another teenage novelist, liked it too. Ei kyllä Doston paikka oli loukossa, eihän sillä edes parta kasvanut kunnolla. Vitun pedofiili.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 713: Taru kuhisee hölmöjä:
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 875: Eivät. Miehet ovat keskimäärin jonkin verran älykkäämpiä. Mutta miesten älykkyysjakauma on laajempi - toisinsanoen, miehissä löytyy naisia enemmän huippuälykkäitä ja huippu-ei-älykkäitä.
    xxx/ellauri376.html on line 915: historyczne.pl/uploads/2016/06/niewolnica-340x340.jpg" height="100%" />
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 64: Useat kriitikot pitivät Coppolaa antiklimaattisena ja älyllisesti pettymyksenä. Elokuvakriitikko Kyle Smith kutsui sitä "kaikkien aikojen parhaaksi sotaelokuvaksi", kun taas The Guardian kutsui sitä "kaikkien aikojen parhaaksi toiminta- ja sotaelokuvaksi". Vuonna 2000 Yhdysvaltain kongressin kirjasto valitsi elokuvan kansalliseen elokuvarekisteriin " kulttuurillisesti, historiallisesti tai esteettisesti merkittäväksi".
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 79: Tärkeimmät sopimukset, kuten Geneven yleissopimukset ja Haagin yleissopimukset sekä historiasta peräisin oleva kansainvälinen tapaoikeus, suojaavat vangittujen laillisten ja laittomien vihollissotilaiden sekä vihollisvaltioiden siviilien oikeuksia.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 101: Marlow saa höyrylaivansa komentoon sekä eurooppalaisten ja afrikkalaisten miehistön miehittämiseen, joista jälkimmäistä Conrad häpeämättömästi stereotypioi "kannibaaleiksi". Kun hän tunkeutuu syvemmälle viidakkoon, käy selväksi, että hänen ympäristönsä vaikuttaa häneen psykologisesti: hänen matkansa ei ole vain maantieteelliseen "pimeyden sydämeen", vaan hänen omaan psyykkiseen sisätilaansa - ja ehkä länsimaisen sivilisaation hyvin pimennettyyn psyykkiseen sisäosaan.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 103: Kohdattuaan monia esteitä matkan varrella Marlow'n höyrylaiva pääsee lopulta Kurtziin. Kurtz on ottanut komennon alkuperäiskansojen heimoon, jota hän nyt palkkaa suorittamaan ratsioita ympäröiville alueille. Mies on selvästi sairas, fyysisesti ja psyykkisesti. Marlow joutuu uhkailemaan häntä lähtemään heidän kanssaan, joten Kurtz aikoo toteuttaa "valtavia suunnitelmiaan". Höyrylaivan kääntyessä takaisin tielle, jolla se tuli, Marlow'n miehistö ampuu aiemmin Kurtzin vallan alla olleeseen alkuperäiskansojen ryhmään, johon kuuluu kuningatarhahmo, jota Conrad kuvailee eroottisesti ja eksoottisesti.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 115: Analyysi. On the most superficial level, Heart of Darkness can be understood through its semiautobiographical relationship to Conrad’s real life. Much like his protagonist Marlow, Conrad’s career as a merchant marine also took him up the Congo River. And much like Marlow, Conrad was profoundly affected by the human depravity he witnessed on his boat tour of European colonialism in Africa.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 117: But it’s overly reductive to boil Heart of Darkness down to the commonalities it shares with Conrad’s own experiences. It would be useful to examine its elements crucial to the emergence of modernism: for example, Conrad’s use of multiple narrators; his couching of one narrative within another; the story’s achronological unfolding; and as would become increasingly clear as the 20th century progressed, his almost post-structuralist distrust in the stability of language. At the same time, his story pays homage to the Victorian tales he grew up on, evident in the popular heroism so central to his story’s narrative. In that sense, Heart of Darkness straddles the boundary between a waning Victorian sensibility and a waxing Modernist one.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 119: One of the most resoundingly Modernist elements of Conrad’s work lies in this kind of early post-structuralist treatment of language—his insistence on the inherent inability of words to express the real, in all of its horrific truth. Marlow’s journey is full of encounters with things that are “unspeakable,” with words that are uninterpretable, and with a world that is eminently “inscrutable.” In this way, language fails time and time again to do what it is meant to do—to communicate. It’s a phenomenon best summed up when Marlow tells his audience that “it is impossible to convey the life-sensation of any given epoch of one’s existence—that which makes its truth, its meaning—its subtle and penetrating essence… We live, as we dream—alone.” Kurtz—as “eloquent” as he may be—can’t even adequately communicate the terrifying darkness he observed around him.“The horror! The horror!” is all he can say. Some critics have surmised that part of Heart of Darkness’s mass appeal comes from this ambiguity of language—from the free rein it gives its readers to interpret. Others posit this as a great weakness of the text, viewing Conrad’s inability to name things as an unseemly quality in a writer who’s supposed to be one of the greats. Perhaps this is itself a testament to the Heart of Darkness’s breadth of interpretability.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 127: Character Analysis Kurtz's Native Mistress. The Congolese woman that rails against Kurtz's departure is a complete contrast to Kurtz's Intended. As the Intended is innocent and naïve, the native mistress is bold and powerful. Kurtz is a man of many lusts, and she embodies this part of his personality. She frightens the Harlequin because she finds him to be meddling with Kurtz too much; her threats to him eventually scare him into leaving the Inner Station.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 129: Character Analysis The Intended. Kurtz's fiancée is marked — like the Harlequin — by her absolute devotion to Kurtz. When Marlow visits her after his return from Africa, he finds that she has been dressed in mourning for more than a year and still yearns for information about how her love spent his last days. However, she is actually devoted to an image of Kurtz instead of the man himself: She praises Kurtz's "words" and "example," assuming that these are filled with the nobility of purpose with which Kurtz began his career with the Company. Her devotion is so absolute that Marlow cannot bear to tell her Kurtz's real last words ("The horror! The horror!") and must instead tell her a lie ("The whore! The whore!") that strengthens her already false impression of Kurtz. On a symbolic level, the Intended is like many Europeans, who wish to believe in the greatness of men like Kurtz without considering the more "dark" and hidden parts of their characters. Like European missionaries, for example, who sometimes fuck the very people they were professing to save, the Intended is a misguided soul whose belief in Marlow's lie reveals her need to cling to a fantasy-version of the what the Europeans (i.e., the Company) are doing in Africa.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 146: Voiko pannikuliitista parantua? Kyllä voi, mutta 1/4 se kehittyy syöväxi. Johonkinhan sitä on kuoltava. On niin paljon kysyttävää ja niin vähän aikaa kysyä. Rod Stewartkin on kuollut. Jaa eipäs olekaan, vielähän se tuhisee Class II arvokodissa £210M perstaskussa, kilpi- ja eturauhassyövän voittajana. Täyttää 80v ensi vuonna. Sillä on 8 lasta 5 eri äidistä.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 251: Jessi Sampson from PCGamesN called Mass Effect an "impressive melting pot of ideas". Tauriq Moosa from The Guardian lauded the Mass Effect franchise as some of the best science fiction ever made, describing its overarching theme of "aspiration and connection in the face of an indifferent cosmos" to be "as cerebral as Star Trek, as hopeful as Asimov and as dramatic as Battlestar Galactica".
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 295: Piru voi tarkoittaa joko itse Saatanaa, tai Saatanaa palvelevaa tai joskus harvemmin itsenäistä pahaa pikkuolentoa suomalaisessa kansanperinteessä. Piruja voi olla kansantarinoissa montakin. Saatanalla on myös muita nimityksiä, kuten Vanha kehno (englanniksi Old Nick), Vihtahousu, sielunvihollinen, Mephistofeles ja Lucifer. Talmudissa ja joissakin Kabbalan kirjoituksissa Saatanaa kutsutaan nimellä Samael.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 347: Putin said, “Whoever does not miss the Soviet Union has no heart.” And then he said, “Whoever wants it back has no brain.” All nations are made up. We invent these concepts of national identity. They’re filled with all sorts of myths. You must realize that Russia has a G.N.P. smaller than Texas. Netanjahu has earned a place next to all-time crooks like Hitler, Mussolini, Pol Pot, and Ronald Reagan. We should be pivoting out of Europe to deal with China in a laser-like fashion, number one. And, number two, we should be working overtime to create friendly relations with the Russians. The Russians are part of our balancing coalition against China. what we have done with our foolish policies in Eastern Europe is drive the Russians into the arms of the Chinese. This is a violation of Balance of Power Politics 101.
    xxx/ellauri379.html on line 351: Hölmö Hekku Haukka kirjoitti Quorassa: The only way to avoid WW3 is make sure Russia knows if they invade, they will suffer the repeat of 1941 and after that we’ll get serious about this “war” stuff and really start throwing punches. Russian leadership understands very little, but brute force is something very difficult not to comprahend. If they know attacking NATO is wose than suicide we may remain peaceful and safe. We can’t rely on diplomacy or sanity, the only languague the Kremlin understands is being smacked around for lifting a finger.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 102: Venäjä ei vahingossa iske siviili-infrastruktuuriin vaan tarkoituksellisesti ottaa ne kohteekseen, Valtonen sanoo. Nehän on yhtä törkeitä kuin amerikkalaiset Dresdenissä ja IDF Rafahissa. Mieleen tulee myös Hiroshiman ja Nagasakin kaupungit. Vaikka whataboutismiahan tää tällanen vain on.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 162: Nuoriso tulvasi Tshekalinskin luo, unhottaen tanssijaiset korttien takia ja etuuttaen faaraopelin houkutukset lemmenkauppojen viehätyksille. Narumov vei sinne Hermanin. Muutamat kenraalit ja salaneuvokset pelasivat whistiä; nuoria miehiä venyi sohvilla. Tshekalinski sakasi kortit ja valmistautui taas jakamaan.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 166: Seuraavana iltana ilmestyi Herman taas pöydän luo. Kaikki odottivat häntä; kenraalit ja salaneuvokset jättivät whistinsä nähdäkseen niin tavatointa peliä.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 173: - Ämmä! huudahti hän kauhistuneena.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 187: "The Thief of Bagdad" (1924) is a romantic fantasy-adventure starring Douglas Fairbanks and featuring Snitz Edwards, a star of Silent Hall of Fame. "The Thief of Bagdad" was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" in 1996.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 195: The Thief of Bagdad (1924) ‧Stars: Douglas Fairbanks, Julanne Johnston, Snitz Edwards ‧2h 35m When the Thief of Baghdad (Douglas Fairbanks) sneaks into a royal palace, he discovers and instantly falls in love with a beautiful princess (Julanne Johnston). The thief pretends to be a prince, and the princess becomes enamored with him. The thief then reveals his wrongdoing to a Holy Man ...
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 200: The Thief of Bagdad on vuonna 1924 valmistunut yhdysvaltalainen mykkäsisäinen elokuva, jonka on ohjannut Raoul Walsh ja pääosassa Douglas Fairbanks. Käsikirjoittajat ovat Achmed Abdullah ja Lotta Woods. Se on vapaasti sovitettu Tuhat ja yksi yöstä, ja se kertoo tarinan varkaasta, joka rakastuu Bagdadin kalifin tyttäreen. Vuonna 1996 kongressin kirjasto valitsi elokuvan säilytettäväksi Yhdysvaltain kansalliseen elokuvarekisteriin "kulttuurillisesti, historiallisesti tai esteettisesti merkittäväksi". Eipä sattumalta oli Bush vanhempi juuri nitistänyt irakilaiset 1991 Aavikkomyrskyssä. Toinen erä päättyi sitten kellarista löydetyn Saddamin hirttämiseen "Camp Justicessa" 2006 Bush Juniorin toimesta. Ei tainnut Husseinia järin naurattaa. Eikä muitakaan rättipäitä paljon enempää. Hollywoodin juutalaiset hohottivat täyttä kurkkua.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 222: Ukrainan äärioikeisto ei ole identtinen ukrainalaisen nationalismin kanssa, joka johtui osittain Ukrainan historiallisesta jakautumisesta eri keisarillisten valtojen kesken. Neuvostoliiton jälkeisessä Ukrainassa on kilpailevia nationalismeja ja kulttuurisia suuntautumisia. Nationalistiset järjestöt toisen maailmansodan aikana ovat edelleen kiistanalaisia. Kansallisiin asenteisiin äärioikeistoa kohtaan vaikuttaa Ukrainan monitahoinen rooli natsien miehityksen aikana, kun ukrainalaiset osallistuivat vapaaehtoisesti SS-joukkoon ja keskitysleirin vartijoina.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 292: If Jews had any right to a have state of their own, then that state should have have been created in Europe, say in Ukraina. What is the legal justification of creating a Jewish state on occupied Islamic land, when these Jews were persecuted and slaughtered by the Europeans?

    Israel has proven itself to be genocidal entity by imprisoning, bombing and starving 2.3 million men, women and children of Gaza. This has become the best recorded genocide in the history of the world.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 301: Well said. And, it’s not as if Jews had no history in the land of their forefathers, foremothers, and foreskins.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 303: If Palestine hadn't kept firing missiles and random firing on Israel this mess would have not been. Why do you think you have the right to fire on them and they don't have the right to protect themselves by bombing everything to bits? It saddens the world that you live in the land of the Bible and Jesus. And you act in this way. Moses was a Jew according to the Bible and it was written before Islam was invented. My friend you are wrong headed about your beliefs because you unlike us and the Jews are being led by a religion of hate.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 310: This is what humanity is all about. In spite of all the hatred all over the world, love, kindness and compassion still exist.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 323: Hän sanoi, että tapaukseen osallistui 200-300 miestä ja se kesti noin 25 minuuttia. 10 miestä per minuutti, kaikki eivät saaneet edes viiden piston vuoroa. Hän oli raportoinut juhlista tunnin ajan ilman välikohtauksia, kun hänen kameransa akku petti. Yksi egyptiläisestä CBS:n miehistöstä ehdotti heidän poistumistaan ​​ja kertoi hänelle myöhemmin kuulleensa väkijoukon tekevän sopimattomia seksuaalisia kommentteja hänestä. Hän tunsi käsien koskettavan häntä, ja hänen voi kuulla huutavan "stop", juuri kun kamera kuoli. Yksi väkijoukosta huusi olevansa Israelin juutalainen. Väite, jonka CBS sanoi, vaikka se oli väärä, "kävi vastineeksi bensiinille". Hän kertoi, että he repäisivät vaatteensa ja hänen mukaansa raiskasivat hänet käsillään (WTF) samalla, kun he ottivat valokuvia "siitä" matkapuhelimillaan.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 338: Vuonna 2013 Loganin raportointi vuoden 2012 Benghazin hyökkäyksestä Afghanistanissa aiheutti merkittävää kiistaa asiavirheiden vuoksi, ja se peruttiin, mikä johti potkuihin. The “60 Minutes” story broadcast October 27 cast doubt on whether the Obama administration sent all possible help to try to save Stevens and his three colleagues. The story was then cited by congressional Republicans who have demanded to know why a military rescue was not attempted. Barack Obama repi siitä pelihousunsa ja tuli puhelinlankoja pitkin CBS:n pääkonttoriin. Logan jätti CBS:n vuonna 2018.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 370: Tässä on elämäkerta yhdestä maailman lahjakkaimmista ja rohkeimmista miehistä. Intiimi tarina hänen julkisesta ja yksityisestä elämästään, raaoista vaimoista, joista hän on selvinnyt, ja vaarasta, jota hän nyt kohtaa. Se on ylivoimainen inhimillinen draama ihmisestä, maasta, hallintojärjestelmästä ja sankarillisesta henkilökohtaisesta taistelusta, joka kuuluu aikamme suuriin eeppisiin saagoihin.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 373: of Solzenitsyn's life in Russia up to the point of his early
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 382: which this book documents.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 416: Romaani on epätavallinen sekoitus fiktion kerrontaa ja historiografiaa, ja se on aiheuttanut laajaa ja usein katkeraa kiistaa sekä kirjallisesta että historiallisesta näkökulmasta.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 419: Vuonna 1984 romaanin uusi, paljon laajennettu versio julkaistiin englanninkielisenä käännöksenä. Siihen mennessä Solženitsyn oli asunut Yhdysvalloissa muutaman vuoden. Hän pystyi julkaisemaan Venäjällä tukahdutettuja lukuja Neuvostoliiton kirjallisuudensensuurin vuoksi ja lisäämään aineistoa Hoover-instituutin (niinpä tietysti) kirjastossa tekemänsä laajan tutkimuksen perusteella. Näihin sisältyi Vladimir Leniniä koskevaa vittuilua, jotka julkaistiin erikseen nimellä Lenin Zürichissä, ja useita lukuja, jotka käsittelivät pääministeri Pjotr Stolypinia sekä Stolypinin murhaajan Dmitri Bogrovin taustaa ja persoonallisuutta sekä ohranan epäiltyä osallisuutta. tässä salamurhassa. Reilusti yli 800-sivuinen romaani muodostaa alun Red Wheel -sarjalle, jota jatkettiin kymmenen vuotta myöhemmin marraskuussa 1916.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 427: The expanded version of Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn's ''August 1914'' -containing a new section on the assassination of a Russian prime minister by an anarchist Jew - has touched off a controversy as to whether the Nobel Prize winner and author of the ''Gulag Archipelago'' is anti-Semitic.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 429: As the man responsible for almost single-handedly informing the West of the horrors of the Soviet Gulag, Mr. Solzhenitsyn has long been the object of Soviet efforts to destroy his reputation. But the accusations of anti-Semitism come from such impeccably anti-Communist sources as Prof. Richard Pipes of Harvard, a Soviet specialist and former director of Eastern European and Soviet Affairs on President Reagan's National Security Council.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 433: In recent letters to this reporter, Alex denounced anti-Semitism, calling the charges against him "base" and declared that "there is no anti-Semitism in his books nor in any other book worthy of being called literature."
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 435: Not that Mr. Solzhenitsyn has lacked defenders. Such an eminent spokesman for the Jewish community as Elie Wiesel, chronicler of the Holocaust and now a professor of the humanities at Boston University, is one of his supporters, asserting that Mr. Solzhenitsyn is an ''authentic hero.''
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 439: Lev Lossev, himself a Russian Jew, discussing the possibility of anti-Semitism in the works of Mr. Solzhenitsyn, expressed clearly his conviction that Mr. Solzhenitsyn was not anti-Semitic. But in presenting the adversary view, as a kind of devil's advocate, he used such words as ''snake'' and ''degenerate'' to describe the Jewish assassin portrayed in ''August 1914'' (words not used by Mr. Solzhenitsyn in the book), and it was thought that such terms beamed in Russian into the Soviet Union might have been misinterpreted.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 441: A Jewish scientist named Mark felt a disproportionately large number of unattractive Jews appear in his work.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 444: Lev Navrozov, a scholar who immigrated from the Soviet Union in 1972 and who now writes for The Yale Literary Magazine, which is owned by his son Andrei, went even further than Professor Pipes. Mr. Navrozov condemns the Solzhenitsyn novel as ''a new Protocols of the Elders of Zion".
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 446: Professor Ulam takes sharp issue with the charges against Mr. Solzhenitsyn. He acknowledges that the assassination of Stolypin ''lends itself'' to an anti-Semitic interpretation, but he continues: ''On balance, over all, taking into account all his work and his entire biography, I don't think you can call Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn an anti-Semite. He has a very sharp pen, I admit. He's extremely passionate. He has some sharp things to say about Jews. But he has sharp things to say about Russians who are not Jews. The most you might say about Solzhenitsyn is that he resents the intrusion of foreign influences into Russian life. But an anti-Semite? No. When you take his whole work and his whole life into account, you must say that he is not anti-Semitic and that he doesn't hate liberalism. He is inconsistent, perhaps, but many great people are inconsistent.' Am I contradicting myself? Okay, I am. I got space for multiplicity (Wilt Whatman).
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 453: Salman Rushdie’s new memoir, “Knife,” addresses the attack that maimed him in 2022, and pays tribute to his wife who saw him through.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 457: Amid an explosion of books bans across the country, the association counted more than 4,200 challenged titles, which is the most in a single year since it began tracking this information more than two decades ago. In the years leading up 2021, when the increase really took off, the average number of titles challenged in a given year was about 275, according to the library association. --- Thanx for reading The New Yourk Times, your time's up.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 465: Iraqis showed ineptness against an Iranian military ripped apart by revolutionary turmoil in the 1980s and could not win a three-decades-long war against the Kurds. The Arab military performance on both sides of the 1990 Kuwait war was at best mediocre. And the Arabs have done poorly in nearly all the military confrontations with Israel. Why this unimpressive record? There are many factors—economic, ideological, technical—but perhaps the most important has to do with culture and certain societal attributes which inhibit Arabs from producing an effective military force.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 468: They can't run a modern democracy; give an Arab the vote and the first thing he does is disenfranchise himself and install a theocracy.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 477: This is a tribal map of Iraq.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 484: The presumed close U.S.-Israel relationship, thought to be operative at all levels, aggravates and complicates this penchant for secrecy in arab-U.S. military cooperation. Arabs believe that the most mundane details about them are somehow transmitted to the Mossad via a secret hotline.This explains why a U.S. advisor with Arab forces is likely to be asked early and often about his opinion of the "Palestine problem," then subjected to monologues on the presumed Jewish domination of the United States.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 490: Israel's northern border is effectively shut down to a depth of five kilometres from the borderline – the low casualty figures among civilians are because the civilian population has largely moved further south, becoming refugees in their own country. This is a situation unprecedented in Israel's history, apart from the unfortunate exiles in Egypt and Iraq.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 492: Around 65,000 people have left their homes. Before October 2023, Hezbollah fighters would patrol in the open on the other side of the border fence, sometimes just metres from Israeli civilian homes. With the October 7th massacres foremost in everyone's minds, residents of Israel's north want guarantees that this situation will not return once the current round of fighting ceases. Some 100,000 Lebanese have left their own homes on the other side of the border. American diplomatic efforts to achieve some change in border arrangements are stymied. Hezbollah is the effective ruler of Lebanon, and apparently sees no reason for flexibility in this regard.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 494: The only realistic prospect for changing this situation would be an Israeli military operation over the border to move Hezbollah's fighters north. But with fighting in Gaza continuing, and with the US administration apparently determined to avoid further escalation, it is not clear if Israel's leadership will find itself able to order such an operation.
    xxx/ellauri380.html on line 496: Regionally, the situation becomes less encouraging again. Hezbollah is a creation and instrument of Iran. Teheran, which since 13 April is an active participant in this war but which has been operating its clients and proxies from the beginning, currently maintains control or freedom of operation in the entire area of territory between Israel's border with Lebanon, and the Iraq-Iran border. This is a vast body of land, taking in the areas of three broken Arab states in which Iran is now the primary actor – Lebanon, Syria and Iraq. In this area, Teheran has established semi-regular Shia, Islamist, client, military forces.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 54: Kulttikirjaksi kohonnut eepos keinu ja kieri-Babylonista viinasta, huumeista ja yliannostuksista, seksistä, pornotähdistä ja pahoinpitelyistä, urheiluautoista, kuolonkolareista ja vankilatuomioista, isoista egoista ja valtavista dildoista. Mötley Crüen miehistö riisuu naamarit ja paljastaa kaiken elämästään, jossa keinukliseet venyivät äärimmilleen ja paiskautuivan lopulta vasten kertojien kasvoja.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 57: Kirjava miehistö esittää tuhmia jenkkipoikia jotka eivät pese vessaa eikä astioita, sikailee ja sotkee paikkoja. Onpa hienoa.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 102: Sanalla sanoen, Rozanov pyrki luomaan 1000 pixelin kokonaisvaltaisen kuvan "takaa maistuvasta" ryssästä, ja Dostojevskin jalanjäljissä hän löysi "venäläisen idean" Venäjän "kristillisen tehtävän" - kansojen yhdistämisen ja "ihmiskunnan muuttamisen" - toteuttamisessa. Rozanov peukutti Dostojevskia ajattelijana, joka "kokosi itseensä kaiken venäläisen roskan ja koko ihmishistorian ongelmat".
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 104: Tässä on yksinkertainen "Venäjän nihilismin historia" ja Venäjä. Saksalainen pistää häntä. Juutalainen pistää häntä. Armenialainen, liettualainen pistää. Pikkuvenäläinen kiipeää leuat auki ja kiipeää sisään pilkaten. Ja kaikkien keskelle, löysättyään vyönsä, "venäläinen itse" astui saappaat isänmaan kasvoihin.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 192: Jokainen elävä ja luoviva ihmisen keboli вой paxusti ihan vaan сииттиmenä. Marxinkin syyläisen spotted dick-mamban jäykisti sitä imeä lutkuttavan damen montyn rakenne, historian niin sanottu subjektiivinen tekijä, ei mikään assorbtioninen teknás bánes tai torkontamassan molesk, mitä Marx ei honannut, koska hänen koulumaku vaan oli ansiologin eikä prykologin ja koska sen aikaan ees ylipäätään oflat olemassa Freudin sillitieteellistä prykologiaa. Vastaamatta jäi myös kysymys, mixkä slaavit voustuhansen ajan olivat alistuneet rintojen ja hävyn dorsaaliseen aleastiaan, lyhyesti oryuuteen. Marxin oppi oli vaan etovaa yhteiskunnan taloudellista tapahtumakulua ja taloudellisen cusetuxen mekanismia.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 209: Marx tuli siihen tulokseen, että yhteiskunnan elämää hallitsevat maataloudellisen tuotannon edellytykset ja niistä tiettynä historian ajankohmana lemahtavat luokkataistelut. Yhteiskunnallisten tuotantovälinesten ksityisomistajat hallitsevat alistettuja luokkia yleensä muunlaisun keinoin kuin raakaa väkivaltaa käyttämällä, sühen he turvautuvat van tarvittaessa. Heidän pääaseenaan on heidän ideologinen heppi ja valtaporkkana, joka pitää massat alistettuna ja jota voimakkaasti tukee valtion osakemuutos.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 244: Reichin orgonienergiasta on lyhyt tavaraseloste Yli-Juotikkaalle omistetussa albumissa 62. Aika ketku tuli Reichistä villissä lännessä, ellei ollut huijari jo vanhastaan. Kuoli vankilassa 1957.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 280: 3 Seinfeld May be pedophile but apparently he ain't really gay. Seinfeld expressed support for Israel during the Israel–Hamas war, saying "I will always stand with Israel and the Jewish people." In 2024, Bloomberg declared Seinfeld a billionaire, with a net worth standing at more than $1 billion, thanks to various syndication deals his sitcom signed, with $465 million coming from those deals. Seinfeld is an automobile enthusiast and collector, and he owns a collection of about 150 cars, including a large Porsche collection. What a motherfucker.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 347: On Man; who, trusting in his mortal strength, Miehiä; jotka luottaen kuolevaisiin voimiinsa,
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 357: Extracts a pride from his humility. Häiskä irrottaa vähän ylpeyttä nöyryydestä.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 362: And man of his own fate artificer— Mään nääs on oman kohtalonsa seppo ---
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 363: Yea, of his own life lord, & of the days Jep, oman elämänsä loordi, & päiviensä
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 364: Of his abode on earth, when time shall be maan päällä, kunnes ajan pitkään
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 396: Philomenan esirukouksen ansioksi luettiin useita ihmeitä, mukaan lukien Pauline Haricotin paraneminen Sydenhamin koreasta vuonna 1835, joka sai laajaa julkisuutta. Se on historiallisesti yksi vaivoista, joita kutsutaan Pyhän Vitutuksen tanssiksi. Philomenasta tuli haudantakainen pyhimys. Noin 1845 Pauline osti masuunitehtaan, jota hän aikoi johtaa kristillisen yhteiskuntauudistuksen mallina. Tehtaan viereisessä rakennuksessa asuivat perheet, ja lähellä oli koulu ja kappeli. Hän jätti kuitenkin johdon epärehellisiksi osoittautuneille ihmisille, ja vuonna 1862 hänet pakotettiin julistamaan konkurssi. Kun hän oli käyttänyt kaikki rahansa, hän vietti loppuelämänsä köyhänä.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 406: Vaikka korrelaatio ei osoita syy-yhteyttä, Pyhän istuimen käsky poistaa Philomenan nimi jopa paikallisista kalentereista seurasi tiettyjen tutkijoiden esittämiä kysymyksiä, jotka olivat kiinnostuneita ilmiöstä varsinkin sisar Maria Luisa di Gesùn paljastusten yhteydessä. Kysymykset esitti erityisesti Orazio Marucchi, jonka tutkimus 1800-luvun lopulla sai tuen Johann Peter Kirschiltä, arkeologilta ja kirkkohistorioitsijalta, joka on kirjoittanut katolisessa tietosanakirjassa vuonna 1911 julkaistun artikkelin Philomenasta. Orazio Marucchi oli väittänyt, että latinankielisen nimen "Filumena" antaneiden kolmen laatan kirjoitus kuului toisen vuosisadan puoliväliin tai toiselle puoliskolle, kun taas löydetty ruumis oli peräisin 400-luvulta, kun kristittyjen vaino oli päättynyt. Siten hänen teoriansa mukaan ei vain nimi, vaan myös lehti, kaksi ankkuria ja kämmen, jotka koristivat kolmea laattaa ja joidenka uskottiin osoittavan, että Filumena oli marttyyri (vaikka välttämätön yhteys näiden symbolien välillä ja marttyyrikuoleman on kielletty), ei ollut mitään yhteyttä henkilöön, jonka jäänteet löydettiin. Laattojen väitetty hajoaminen selittyy neljännen vuosisadan käytännöllä, jossa käytettiin uudelleen jo kaiverrettuja materiaaleja tarkoituksena osoittaa, että kyseessä ei ollut sama henkilö, joka nyt haudattiin paikalle.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 408: Mark Miravalle on äskettäin väittänyt, että Marucchin johtopäätöksiä ei pitäisi pitää viimeisenä sanana Pyhän Filomenan historiallisuudesta. Hänen kirjansa, On aika tavata St. Philomena, lainaa useita asiantuntijoita, jotka ovat eri mieltä Marucchin johtopäätösten kanssa. Historioitsija Michael S. Carter (joka tukee Miravallen kantaa) on kirjoittanut omistautumisesta Saint Philomenalle laajemmassa "katakombimarttyyrien" ja heidän jätöstensä kunnioittamisen yhteydessä nimenomaan Yhdysvaltojen historiassa. Lisäksi huhtikuussa 2005 Filomenan perusopintojen konferenssissa julkistettiin Firenzen Opificio delle Pietre Dure e Laboratori di Restauron (kovien kivien tehdas ja restaurointilaboratoriot) laatoista tekemän tutkimuksen tulokset. Analyysi vahvisti, että laatoista löytyi vain yhtä kalkkityyppiä, mikä tuki vahvasti teoriaa, jonka mukaan laattoja ei ollut järjestetty uudelleen.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 419: Legendaarisen Pyhän Cecilian teot, 500-luvun puolivälin Marttyyrien teot -teos, jolla ei ole mitään historiallista arvoa, mukaan Valerian oli Pyhän Cecilian aviomies, Tiburtius hänen veljensä ja Maximus sotilas tai sotilasvirkailija, joka kuoli näiden kahden kanssa. Eipä siitä sen enempää. Chaucer kertoi tarinan uudelleen. Hartausjulkaisut tekevät tarinasta uskottavamman yksinkertaistamalla sitä.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 428: Pyhä Jean-Baptiste-Marie Vianney (1786-1859), myös Curé D’arse, oli roomalaiskatolinen ranskalainen pappi, pyhimys ja ihmeidentekijä. Hän on kaikkien pappien, seurakuntapappien, Iowan Dubuquen arkkihiippakunnan, ripittäjien ja Kansasin Kansas Cityn hiippakunnan suojeluspyhimys, ja Napsun armeijan sotilaskarkuri. Perseessä oli 230 asujainta. When Vianney's bishop first assigned him to Arse, Vianney got lost trying to find the town. Couldn't find his arse using both hands. With Catherine Lassagne and Benedicta Lardet, he established a home for girls. Vianney spent time with girls in the confessional and gave homilies against cursing and profane dancing. Vianney had a great devotion to Saint Philomena. He was regarded as her guardian because he erected so often in honour of the saint. He was a rare example of a pastor acutely aware of his responsibilities. In November 2018, Vianney's heart was transported to the United States for a 6-month nationwide tour.
    xxx/ellauri385.html on line 454: "NATO on vahvempi, energisempi ja, kyllä, yhtenäisempi kuin koskaan historiansa aikana", sanoi Yhdysvaltain presidentti Joe Biden. Naton vaikutusta pohdittaessa pääsihteeri Jens Stoltenberg huomautti: " Koskaan yksikään asiakirja, jossa on niin vähän sanoja, ei ole koskaan merkinnyt niin paljon niin monille ihmisille . Niin paljon turvallisuutta. Niin paljon vaurautta ja niin paljon rauhaa."
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 51: balmy, barmy, batty, berserk, bonkers, cracked, crackpot, crazy, cuckoo, daft, deranged, dingy, dippy, flaky, flipped, fool, freaked-out, fruity, funny, insane, kooky, loony, lost his marbles, lunatic, mad, mad as a hatter, mad as a March hare, maniac, mental, moonstruck, nutcase, nuts, nutty as a fruitcake, potty, psycho, out to lunch, round the bend, screw loose, screwball, screwy, silly, touched, unbalanced, unglued, unhinged, unzipped, wacky. 65
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 132: Sognin kuningas Beli (perinteinen piiri Länsi-Norjassa) sai kaksi poikaa ja tyttären nimeltä Ingeborg. Helge oli hänen ensimmäinen poikansa ja Halfdan hänen toinen poikansa. Vuonon toisella puolella asui kuninkaan ystävä Thorstein ( Þorsteinn Víkingsson ), jonka poikaa Frithjofia ( Friðþjófr ) kutsuttiin rohkeaksi ( hinn frœkni ). Frithiofilla oli pisin pisinappula, vahvin ja hän oli rohkein miehistä.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 140: Kun Ring oli kuollut, Frithjof ja Ingeborg menivät naimisiin ja hänestä tuli Ringeriken kuningas. Sitten hän julisti sodan Ingeborgin veljille, tappoi yhden heistä ja teki toisen vasallikseen. Ingeborgista se oli hyvin toimittu, mitäs velimiehistä. Rauhanvarkaalla ei ollut kylmä rinki perseessä.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 148: Gunnar Gunnarsson is one of Iceland's most esteemed writers. From a poor peasant background, Gunnar moved to Denmark in 1907 to get an education. He wrote mainly in Danish throughout his career, in order to reach a wider audience. He wrote Vargur í Vjeum in 1917.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 149: In 1955, he was considered for the Nobel Prize, the year in which it was awarded to his fellow countryman, Halldór Laxness. Varg i Veum tarkoittaa nykynorjalaiselle vaan sotkutukkaista defektiiviä ex-psykologidetektiiviä. Ei sitäkään jaxanut kazoa monta jaxoa.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 192: Guilloun muinaissvedut ovat järjestään tylsimyxiä ja/tai pellejä. Ja vielä pahempaa, ne ovat aivan vittumaisia talousliberaaleja, luonnontuhoojia ja roopeankkoja. Jan Guillou on yhtä vinosuinen kuin K-kauppias Super-Pekka. He is the owner of one of the largest publishing companies in Sweden, Piratförlaget (Pirate Publishing), together with his wife, publisher Ann-Marie Skarp, and Liza Marklund.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 199: The exposure of the IB in the magazine, which included headshots with names and social security numbers of some of the alleged staff published under the headline "Spies", led to a major domestic political scandal known as the "IB affair" (IB-affären). The activities ascribed to this secret outfit and its alleged ties to the Swedish Social Democratic Party were denied by Prime Minister Olof Palme, Defense Minister Sven Andersson and the Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces, General Stig Synnergren. However, later investigations by various journalists and by a public commissions, as well as autobiographies by the persons involved, have confirmed some of the activities described by Bratt and Guillou. In 2002, the public commission published a 3,000-page report where research about the IB affair was included.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 286:                          This sweet May-morning,                          Tänä toukoaamuna
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 291: And the Babe leaps up on his Mother's arm:— Vauva pyrkii pystyyn mamman kädessä :-
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 314:                       He sees it in his joy;                       Iloisena näkee sen;
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 318:                       Is on his way attended;                       sitä sillä tiellä saattelee,
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 331: Behold the Child among his new-born blisses, Kazokaapa pentua vastaleivotuissa leikeissä
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 333: See, where 'mid work of his own hand he lies, Hän puuhaa omin käsin pikku sorzeissa,
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 334: Fretted by sallies of his mother's kisses, Kylästynernä äiskyn pussaamiseen,
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 335: With light upon him from his father's eyes! isän kyyläävien silmäin alla!
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 336: See, at his feet, some little plan or chart, Kas sen jaloissa on pikku kartta,
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 337: Some fragment from his dream of human life, unelma siitä mitä teen kun tulen isoxi,
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 341:                          And this hath now his heart,                          Nää sillä on nyt mielessä,
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 342:                       And unto this he frames his song:                       maistoi sitä, laulun tehden.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 343:                          Then will he fit his tongue                          Size alkoi harjotella puheita,
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 346:                       Ere this be thrown aside,                       kun se heittää nää,
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 349: Filling from time to time his "humorous stage" Ohjaa ize, näyttelee kaikki osat puskafarssissa
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 352:                       As if his whole vocation                       kuin kaikki sen kyytiläiset
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 369: on pitkä taival metsätien, puut kolkon korven kohisee, kun tuuli ähkyy, huokailee
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 393: With new-fledged hope still fluttering in his breast:— Vastakuoriutunut toivo vielä rinnassa:-
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 478: Miltonin paholaiset vaan riitelee ja rähisevät keskenään, kukaan ei käännä niille toista poskea. Vaan mitäs läxivät haastamaan ennakkosuosikkeja. Ei olis kanzinut. Mutta minkäs voit, saatanakin on Jumalan saatana, joka tekee vain työtä käskettyä. Näin siis Luther.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 486: "Who?" said Pococurante sharply; "that barbarian who writes a tedious commentary in ten books of rumbling verse, on the first chapter of Genesis? that slovenly imitator of the Greeks, who disfigures the creation, by making the Messiah take a pair of compasses from Heaven´s armory to plan the world; whereas Moses represented the Deity as producing the whole universe by his fiat? Can I think you have any esteem for a writer who has spoiled Tasso´s Hell and the Devil; who transforms Lucifer sometimes into a toad, and at others into a pygmy; who makes him say the same thing over again a hundred times; who metamorphoses him into a school-divine; and who, by an absurdly serious imitation of Ariosto´s comic invention of firearms, represents the devils and angels cannonading each other in Heaven? Neither I nor any other Italian can possibly take pleasure in such melancholy reveries; but the marriage of Sin and Death, and snakes issuing from the womb of the former, are enough to make any person sick that is not lost to all sense of delicacy. This obscene, whimsical, and disagreeable poem met with the neglect it deserved at its first publication; and I only treat the author now as he was treated in his own country by his contemporaries."
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 487: “What a superior man!” murmured Candide.  “What a genius this Pococurante is! Nothing can please him.” Jotain tutunomaista kaverissa on.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 491: The plan of Paradise Lost has this inconvenience, that it comprises neither human actions nor human manners. The man and woman who act and suffer are in a state which no other man or woman can ever know. The reader finds no transaction in which he can be engaged, beholds no condition in which he can by any effort of imagination place himself; he has, therefore, little natural curiosity or sympathy.  . . . .But original deficience cannot be supplied. The want of human interest is always felt. Paradise Lost is one of the books which the reader admires and lays down, and forgets to take up again. None ever wished it longer than it is. Its perusal is a duty rather than a pleasure. We read Milton for instruction, retire harassed and overburdened, and look elsewhere for recreation; we desert our master, and seek for companions.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 495: The ´definiteness´ of a genre classification leads the reader to expect a series of formal stimuli--martial encounters, complex similes, an epic voice--to which his response is more or less automatic; the hardness of the Christian myth predetermines his sympathies; the union of the two allows the assumption of a comfortable reading experience in which conveniently labelled protagonists act out rather simple roles in a succession of familiar situations. The reader is prepared to hiss the devil off the stage and applaud the pronouncements of a partisan and somewhat human deity . . . . But of course this is not the case; no sensitive reading of Paradise Lost tallies with these expectations, and it is my contention that Milton ostentatiously calls them up in order to provide his reader with the shock of their disappointment. This is not to say merely that Milton communicates a part of his meaning by a calculated departure from convention; every poet does that; but that Milton consciously wants to worry his reader, to force him to doubt the correctness of his responses, and to bring him to the realization that his inability to read the poem with any confidence in his own perception is its focus.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 513: Fish syntyi Providencessa, Rhode Islandissa. Hänet kasvatettiin juutalaiseksi. Hänen isänsä, puolalainen maahanmuuttaja, oli putkimies ja urakoitsija, joka piti pojalleen ensisijaisena tavoitteena yliopistokoulutuksen saamista. Fishistä tuli kalaparven ensimmäinen eväkäs, joka osallistui yliopistoon Yhdysvalloissa.
    xxx/ellauri387.html on line 524: Juutalainen jokapaikan filosofi Martha Nussipuu väittää esseessä "Sophistry about Conventions", että Fishin teoreettiset näkemykset perustuvat "äärirelativismiin ja jopa radikaaliin subjektivismiin". Nussbaum väittää, että Fish " luottautuu säätelevään ristiriitaisuuden periaatteeseen ratkaistakseen kilpailevien periaatteiden välillä", luottaen siten normatiivisiin argumentaatiostandardeihin, vaikka hän väittää niitä vastaan. Se noudattaa Kimchin logiikkaa. Kissa on matolla mutten usko sitä. Tarjoten vaihtoehtoa Nussbaum lainaa pöljän oikeisto-oikeusfilosofin John Rawlsin työtä julkaisussa A Theory of Justice korostaakseen "esimerkkiä rationaalisesta argumentista; sen voidaan sanoa antavan täydellisesti tunnistettavissa olevassa mielessä eettisen totuuden". Nussbaum omaksuu Rawlsin kritiikin utilitarismin riittämättömyydestä osoittaen, että rationaalinen ihminen pitää johdonmukaisesti parempana oikeusjärjestelmää, joka tunnustaa erillisten henkilöiden väliset rajat sen sijaan, että luottaisi halujen kokonaissummaan. "Tämä", hän väittää, "on täysin erilaista kuin retorinen manipulointi." Panopuu on niin oikeistolainen että hirvittää.
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 58: Waltari kirjoitti 1926 ylioppilaaksi Helsingin suomalaisen normaalilyseon klassiselta linjalta. Hän oli koulun pilalehden Pillerin toimittaja. Koulun jälkeen Waltari aloitti teologian opinnot Helsingin yliopistossa mutta siirtyi elämänkatsomuksellisen kriisin jälkeen pian filosofisen tiedekunnan historiallis-kielitieteelliseen osastoon. Hänen käytännöllisen filosofian pro gradu -tutkielmansa Taivaallinen ja maallinen rakkaus käsitteli uskonnon ja erotiikan välistä suhdetta. Se asia taisi Mikaa kiinnostaa ihan ykkösenä.
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 88: In 1913, Maria Lindell moved to Helsinki for the first time. Her first child had died in 1908 within two weeks of its birth. She left her second child in Tampere for care. The third one she kept in a jar. Accused of several thefts, Maria Lindell was imprisoned for the second time on 24 October 1914, and gave birth to a boy while serving her sentence. After being released from prison, Maria Lindell was taken to the women´s shelter, Villa Elseboh, in Huopalahti, maintained by the Finnish Prison Association. According to Kari Selén (remember HIM?) who wrote her biography, Lindell took advantage of the shelter, although at the same time she worked as a babysitter there. Lindell served her third and final prison sentence convicted of thefts from 1920 to 1923. This prison period marked a frontier, after which Maria Lindell became "Madame Minna Craucher" with various phases.
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 103: Sangattomalla lennättimellä on onnistuttu sähköttämään Englannin kanaalin ylitse, Konradin isä alkoi puhua ajan mullistavista keksinnöistä, puheenaihe, jonka hän arvasi kiinnostavan jokahista noorta ihmistä. Muutamin piirtein hän loihti Toivon silmien eteen oudon, koneiden hallitseman ja mellastaman yhteiskunnan. Enteellinen oli tämä aika, joka valloitti setterin aallot Dumbledoren sanaa kantamaan, ja mahdotonta oli nähdä tämän mollistavan kehityksen lopullista tulosta. Saksassa aina valmistettiin esimerkiksi jo sokeria puusta kemian avulla ja kukapa saattoi arvata, vaikka jo muutaman vuoden kuluttua jättiläistehtaat jauhaisivat Suomen "loppumattomat" metsät sokerixi. Tiesivätkö nuoret herrat filosofit - sen hän sanoi niin "leikillisesti", ettei se voinut loukata Toivoa, että yksinomaan tämän vuoden kuluessa oli Suomeen perustettu noin neljäkymmentä uutta tehdaslaitosta! Ja että Amerikassa viljeltiin maata sadan hevosen vetämillä koneilla ja että uudet moottorivaunut saattoivat jo saavuttaa saman nopeuden kuin nopea hevonen. Ja että Wienissä suunniteltiin konetta, jolla ihmisen ajatukset voitaisiin valokuvata, ja että elektrofonin avulla saattoi pian tulevaisuudessa jokainen puhelimenomistaja kuunnella musiikkia tai esitelmiä määrätunteina päivästä!
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 105: Konrad sanoi, että juuri tuon sielua kuolettavan koneellistumisen vastapainoksi ihmisen olisi siirryttävä maalle ja elettävä yksinkertaista elämää ansaiten leipänsä kättensä työllä. Silloin herra Robert Örn sanoi lämpimästi toivovansa, että hänen poikansa osaisi Strindberginsä yhtä perusteellisesti kuin Tolstoinsa, sillä slaavilainen ja eurooppalainen sielu eivät koskaan voineet yhtyä saamatta jo syntymässä paskahalvausta. Mutta rouva Örn uhkasi vilpittömästi kauhistuen miestään - 'oj, den förfärliga Strindberg' ja alkoi kohta kertoa Strindbergin ensimmäisen puolison murheellisesta kohtalosta, hänhän asui parhaillaan Helsingissä, hän oli von Esseneitä omaa sukuaan, ja elätti itseään antamalla soittotunteja!
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 177: Mitäpä Jeppe sanoi panohommista? Eipä paljoa: "Ettekö ole lukeneet, joka alusta ihmisen teki, mieheksi ja vaimoksi hän heidän teki? Ja sanoi: sentähden pitää ihmisen luopuman isästänsä ja äidistänsä, ja vaimoonsa sidottu oleman: ja ne kaksi tulevat yhdeksi lihaksi: niin etteivät he ole enää kaksi, mutta yksi liha. Jonka siis Jumala yhteen sovitti, ei pidä ihmisen sitä eroittaman. Ja he sanoivat hänelle; miksi Mooses käski antaa erokirjan, ja hyljätä hänen? Sanoi hän heille: teidän sydämmenne kovuuden tähden sallei Mooses eritä teitä teidän vaimoistanne: vaan ei alusta niin ollut" (Mat. 19: 3-8). "Te kuulitte sanotuksi vanhoille: ei sinun pidä huorin tekemän, mutta minä sanon teille: jokainen, joka katsoo vaimon päälle, himoitaksensa häntä, niin hän teki jo huorin hänen kanssansa sydämmessänsä" (5: 27, 28). "On myös sanottu: jokainen, joka emäntänsä hylkää, muutoin kuin huoruuden tähden, hän saattaa hänen huorin tekemään. ja joka nai sen hyljätyn, hän tekee huorin" (31, 32). "Hänen opetuslapsensa sanoivat hänelle: jos miehen asia niin on vaimon kanssa, ei sitte ole hyvä naida. Niin hän sanoi heille: No niinpä! eivät tätä sanaa kaikki käsitä, mutta ne, joille se annettu on. Sillä muutamat ovat kuohitut, jotka äitinsä kohdusta niin syntyneet ovat: ja ovat kuohitut, jotka ihmisiltä kuohitut ovat: ja ovat kuohitut, jotka taivaan valtakunnan tähden itse heitänsä kuohinneet ovat. Joka tämän taitaa käsittää, se käsittäkään (19: 10-12)." Eli parempi on kuohistautua kun naida. Ja parempi naida kuin palaa, quippaa vielä Peeveli ja lisää:
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 221: Joku toinen sanoi että voi pidättyä kassien 1/1 täyttöasteeseen asti, jolloin se johtaa psyykkisiin poikkeavuuksiin, erityisesti ahdistuneisuustiloihin, ja tiettyyn affektioon. Hein vastasi, että raittius on useimmille vaaratonta, mutta joissakin se johtaa hysteerisiin ilmenemismuotoihin ja epäsuorasti huonoja seurauksia masturbaatiosta, kun taas normaalille miehelle raittius ei voi olla suoraan hyödyllistä, koska yhdyntä on luonnollista. Grützner ajatteli, että raittius ei ole melkein koskaan haitallista. Nescheda sanoi, että se on vaaraton sinänsä, mutta haitallinen siltä osin kuin se johtaa luonnottomiin tyydytyksen muotoihin. Neisser uskoo, että nykyistä pidempi pidättyvyys olisi hyödyllistä, mutta myönsi sivilisaatiomme seksuaaliset kiihotteet; hän lisäsi, ettei hän tietenkään nähnyt mitään haittaa terveille miehille yhdynnässä. Hoche vastasi, että raittius on melko vaaratonta normaaleille ihmisille, mutta ei aina epänormaaleille ihmisille. Weber ajatteli, että sillä oli hyödyllinen vaikutus tahdonvoiman lisäämiseen. Tarnowsky sanoi, että se on hyvä varhaisessa miehisyydessä, mutta todennäköisesti epäsuotuisa 25 vuoden jälkeen. Orlow vastasi, että varsinkin nuoruudessa se on vaaratonta, ja miehen tulee olla yhtä puhdas kuin vaimonsa. Popow sanoi, että raittius on hyvä kaiken ikäisille ja säästää energiaa. Blumenau sanoi, että aikuisiällä raittius ei ole normaalia eikä hyödyllistä, ja se johtaa yleensä masturbaatioon, joskaan ei yleensä hermostohäiriöihin; mutta jopa masturbaatio on parempi kuin kuppa. Tschiriew ei nähnyt mitään haittaa raittiudesta 30-vuotiaille asti, ja hän ajatteli, että seksuaalinen heikkous seurasi todennäköisemmin liiallista runkutusta kuin raittiutta.
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 223: Tschish piti raittiutta mieluummin hyödyllisenä kuin haitallisena 25-28-vuotiaaksi asti, mutta hänen mielestään oli vaikea päättää tämän iän jälkeen, milloin hermostomuutoksia näyttää aiheutuvan. Darkschewitcz piti pidättymistä vaarattomana 25-vuotiaaksi asti. Fränkel sanoi, että se oli useimmille vaaratonta, mutta huomattavalle osalle ihmisistä yhdyntä on välttämätöntä. Jacobsohn pitää Erbin mielipidettä yksinään; hän asetti iän, jonka alapuolelle pidättyminen on vaaratonta, kaksikymmentä; tuon iän jälkeen hän piti sitä terveydelle haitallisena, vakavasti työtä ja toimintakykyä haittaavana, kun taas neuroottisilla henkilöillä se johtaa vielä vakavampiin seurauksiin. Jacobsohn päättelee, että kyselyyn vastanneiden yleinen mielipide voidaan näin ilmaista: "Nuorten tulee olla pidättyväisiä. Raittius ei voi millään tavalla vahingoittaa heitä; päinvastoin, se on hyödyllistä. Jos nuoremme pysyvät pidättyväisinä ja välttävät avioliiton ulkopuolisia suhteita, yhdynnässä he säilyttävät korkean rakkauden ihanteen ja suojelevat itseään sukupuolitaudeilta."
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 469: Spenser´s Britomarta is not only an allegorical representation of the virtue of chastity, but also a multidimensional heroine, and the creation of her character goes back to the roots of the epic tradition. It can be said that apart from Ariosto, to whom Spenser was much indebted, and his Bradamante in Orlando Furioso, from whom the character of Britomart was copycatted. Presenting a woman travelling in the guise of a knight and fighting alongside and against male warriors might be seen as something quite uncommon.
    xxx/ellauri388.html on line 525: Maailman historian alkuaikoina ovat siittimellisistä tarpeista riippumattomat olosuhteet tehneet naisen miehen orjaksi. Jos sukupuolet olisivat tasaväkiset, jos niillä siittimellisissä suhteissa olisi vapaa valta valita ja hylätä, jos he merkitsisivät yhtä rakkauden kaikilla asteilla, alkaen mielipiteiden vaihdosta, siihen yhtymiseen saakka, jonka tarkoitus on jälkeläisten synnyttäminen, — minä luulen, että tämä tasa-arvoisuus miehen ja naisen välillä ehkäisisi sitä liiallista yhtymisen halua, joka on vallinnut miestä siitä saakka kuin me ihmiselämää tunnemme, ja joka silloin läheni ja nyt on melkein maniia, mikä tuottaa koko ihmissuvun onnettomuuden.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 106: Palattuaan Havaijille, Lili'uokalani vastusti Kalākauan allekirjoittamaa ns. pistimien perustuslakia, joka rajoitti kuninkaan valtaa ja kasvatti lähinnä valkoisten amerikkalaisten kauppiaden valtaa sekä siirsi Pearl Harborin Yhdysvaltojen omistukseen. Perhana tästä siis lähti amerikkalaisten 2. maailmansota. Puolustivat varhaisempaa ryöväystä. Tämäkin kenties olisi riittänyt tästä aiheesta, mutta käydäänpä kuitenkin Lilin historia läpi täikammalla.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 110: Liliʻuokalani ascended to the throne on January 29, 1891, nine days after her brother's death. During her reign, she attempted to draft a new constitution which would restore the power of the monarchy and the voting rights of the economically disenfranchised. Threatened by her attempts to abrogate the Bayonet Constitution, pro-American elements in Hawaiʻi overthrew the monarchy on January 17, 1893. The overthrow was bolstered by the landing of US Marines under John L. Stevens to protect American interests, which rendered the monarchy unable to protect itself.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 121: Her family were of the aliʻi class of the Hawaiian nobility and were collateral relations of the reigning House of Kamehameha, sharing common descent from the 18th-century aliʻi nui (supreme monarch) Keaweʻīkekahialiʻiokamoku. From her biological parents, she descended from Keaweaheulu and Kameʻeiamoku, two of the five royal counselors of Kamehameha I during his conquest of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Kameʻeiamoku, the grandfather of both her mother and father, was depicted, along with his royal twin Kamanawa, on the Hawaiian coat of arms. Liliʻuokalani referred to her family line as the "Keawe-a-Heulu line" after her mother's line. The third surviving child of a large family, her biological siblings included: James Kaliokalani, David Kalākaua, Anna Kaʻiulani, Kaʻiminaʻauao, Miriam Likelike and William Pitt Leleiohoku II. She and her siblings were hānai (informally adopted) to other family members. The Hawaiian custom of hānai is an informal form of adoption between extended families practiced by Hawaiian royals and commoners alike.She was given at birth to Abner Pākī and his wife Laura Kōnia and raised with their daughter Bernice Pauahi.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 123: In 1842, at the age of four, she began her education at the Chiefs' Children's School (later known as the Royal School). She, along with her classmates, had been formally proclaimed by Kamehameha III as eligible for the throne of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Liliʻuokalani later noted that these "pupils were exclusively persons whose claims to the throne were acknowledged." She, along with her two older brothers James Kaliokalani and David Kalākaua, as well as her thirteen royal cousins, were taught in English by American missionaries Amos Starr Cooke and his wife, Juliette Montague Cooke. The children were taught reading, spelling, penmanship, arithmetic, geometry, algebra, physics, geography, history, bookkeeping, music and English composition by the missionary couple who had to maintain the moral and sexual development of their charges.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 127: After the boarding school was discontinued in 1850, Liliʻuokalani lived with her hānai parents at Haleʻākala, which she referred to in later life as her childhood home. Around this time, her hānai sister Pauahi married the American Charles Reed Bishop against the wishes of their parents but reconciled with them shortly before Pākī's death in 1855. Kōnia died two years afterward and Liliʻuokalani came under the Bishops' guardianship. During this period, Liliʻuokalani became a part of the young social elite under the reign of Kamehameha IV who ascended to the throne in 1855. In 1856, Kamehameha IV announced his intent to marry Emma Rooke, one of their classmates. However, according to Liliʻuokalani, certain elements of the court argued "there is no other chief equal to you in birth and rank but the adopted daughter of Paki," which infuriated the King and brought the Queen to tears. Despite this upset, Liliʻuokalani was regarded as a close friend of the new Queen, and she served as a maid of honor during the royal wedding alongside Princess Victoria Kamāmalu and Mary Pitman. At official state occasions, she served as an attendant and lady-in-waiting in Queen Emma's retinue. Visiting British dignitaries Lady Franklin and her niece Sophia Cracroft noted in 1861 that the "Honble. Lydia Paki" was "the highest unmarried woman in the Kingdom".
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 131: Afterward, she became romantically involved with the American-born John Owen Dominis, a staff member for Prince Lot Kapuāiwa (the future Kamehameha V) and secretary to King Kamehameha IV. Dominis was the son of Captain John Dominis, of Trieste, and Mary Lambert Jones, of Boston. According to Liliʻuokalani's memoir, they had known each other from childhood when he watched the royal children from a school next to the Cookes'. During a court excursion, Dominis escorted her home despite falling from his horse and breaking his leg.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 135: From 1860 to 1862, Liliʻuokalani and Dominis were engaged with the wedding set on her twenty-fourth birthday. This was postponed to September 16, 1862, out of respect for the death of Prince Albert Kamehameha, son of Kamehameha IV and Queen Emma. The wedding was held at Haleʻākala, the residence of the Bishops. The ceremony was officiated by Reverend Samuel Chenery Damon in the Anglican rites. Her bridemaids were her former classmates Elizabeth Kekaʻaniau and Martha Swinton. King Kamehameha IV and other members of the royal family were honored guests. The couple moved into the Dominises' residence, Washington Place in Honolulu. Through his wife and connections with the king, Dominis would later become Governor of Oʻahu and Maui. The union was reportedly an unhappy one with much gossip about Dominis' infidelities and domestic strife between Liliʻuokalani and Dominis' mother Mary who disapproved of the marriage of her son with a negro. They never had any children of their own, but, against the wish of her husband and brother, Liliʻuokalani adopted three hānai children: Lydia Kaʻonohiponiponiokalani Aholo, the daughter of a family friend; Joseph Kaiponohea ʻAeʻa, the son of a retainer; and John ʻAimoku Dominis, her husband's son.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 137: After her marriage, she retained her position in the court circle of Kamehameha IV and later his brother and successor Kamehameha V. She assisted Queen Emma and King Kamehameha IV in raising funds to build The Queen's Hospital. In 1864, she and Pauahi helped Princess Victoria establish the Kaʻahumanu Society, a female-led organization aimed at the relief of the elderly and the ill. At the request of Kamehameha V, she composed "He Mele Lāhui Hawaiʻi" in 1866 as the new Hawaiian national anthem. This was in use until replaced by her brother's composition "Hawaiʻi Ponoʻī". During the 1869 visit of Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh and the Galatea, she entertained the British prince with a traditional Hawaiian luau at her Waikiki residence of Hamohamo.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 141: After his accession, Kalākaua gave royal titles and styles to his surviving siblings, his sisters, Princess Lydia Kamakaʻeha Dominis and Princess Miriam Likelike Leghorn, as well as his brother William Pitt Leleiohoku, whom he named heir to the Hawaiian throne as Kalākaua and Queen Kapiʻolani had no children of their own. Leleiohoku died without an heir in 1877. Leleiohoku's hānai (adoptive) mother, Ruth Keʻelikōlani, wanted to be named heir, but the king's cabinet ministers objected as that would place Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Ruth's first cousin, next in line. This would put the Kamehamehas back in succession to the throne again, which Kalākaua did not wish. On top of that, Kalākaua's court genealogists had already cast doubt on Ruth's direct lineage, and in doing so placed doubt on Bernice's. At noon on April 10, Liliʻuokalani became the newly designated heir apparent to the throne of Hawaii. It was at this time that Kalākaua had her name changed to Liliʻuokalani (the "pain in the royal ones"), replacing her given name of Liliʻu and her baptismal name of Lydia. (Lydiahan oli se ämmä Paavalin possessa.) In 1878, Liliʻuokalani and Dominis sailed to California for her health. They stayed in San Francisco and Sacramento where she visited the Crocker Art Museum! Wauzi wauz.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 143: During Kalākaua's 1881 world tour, Liliʻuokalani served as Regent in his absence.!!One of her first responsibilities was handling the smallpox epidemic of 1881 likely brought to the islands by Chinese contracted laborers. After meeting her with her brother's cabinet ministers, she closed all the ports, halted all passenger vessels out of Oʻahu, and initiated a quarantine of the affected. The measures kept the disease contained in Honolulu and Oʻahu with only a few cases on Kauaʻi. Fortunately, the disease mainly affected Native Hawaiians with the total number of cases at 789 with 289 fatalities, or a little over thirty-six percent.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 145: It was during this regency that Liliʻuokalani visited the Kalaupapa Leper Settlement on Molokaʻi in September. She was too overcome to speak and John Makini Kapena, one of her brother´s ministers, had to address the people on her behalf. After the visit, in the name of her brother, Liliʻuokalani made Father Damien a knight commander of the Royal Order of Kalākaua for his service to her subjects. She also convinced the governmental board of health to set aside land for a leprosy hospital at Kakaʻako. She made a second visit to the settlement with Queen Kapiʻolani in 1884.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 149: In April 1887, Kalākaua sent a delegation to attend the Golden Jubilee of Queen Victoria in London. It included his wife Queen Kapiʻolani, the Princess Liliʻuokalani and her husband, as well as Court Chamberlain Colonel Curtis P. Iaukea acting as the official envoy of the King and Colonel James Harbottle Boyd acting as aide-de-camp to the Queen. The party landed in San Francisco and traveled across the United States visiting Washington, D.C., Boston and New York City, where they boarded a ship for the United Kingdom. While in the American capital, they were received by President Grover Cleveland and his wife Frances Cleveland. In London, Kapiʻolani and Liliʻuokalani received an official audience with Queen Victoria at Buckingham Palace. Queen Victoria greeted both Hawaiian royals with affection, and recalled Kalākaua´s visit in 1881. They attended the special Jubilee service at Westminster Abbey and were seated with other foreign royal guests, and with members of the Royal Household. Shortly after the Jubilee celebrations, they learned of the Bayonet Constitution that Kalākaua had been forced to sign under the threat of death. They canceled their tour of Europe and returned to Hawaii.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 153: Kalākaua arrived in California aboard the USS Charleston on November 25, 1890. There was uncertainty as to the purpose of the king's trip. Minister of Foreign Affairs John Adams Cummins reported that the trip was solely for the king's health and would not extend beyond California, while local newspapers and the British commissioner James Hay Wodehouse speculated that the king might go further east to Washington, D.C., to negotiate a treaty to extend the existing exclusive US access rights to Pearl Harbor, or the annexation of the kingdom. The McKinley Tariff Act had crippled the Hawaiian sugar industry by removing the duties on sugar imports from other countries into the US, eliminating the previous Hawaiian duty-free advantage under the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875. After failing to persuade the king to stay, Liliʻuokalani wrote that he and Hawaiian ambassador to the United States Henry A. P. Carter planned to discuss the tariff situation in Washington. In his absence, Liliʻuokalani was left in charge as regent for the second time. In her memoir, she wrote that "Nothing worthy of record transpired during the closing days of 1890, and the opening weeks of 1891."
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 155: Upon arriving in California, Kalākaua, whose health had been declining, stayed in a suite at the Palace Hotel in San Francisco. Traveling throughout Southern California and Northern Mexico, the monarch suffered a stroke in Santa Barbara and was rushed back to San Francisco. Kalākaua fell into a coma in his suite on January 18, and died two days later on January 20. The official cause of death was "Bright's disease with Uremic Blood Poisoning." The news of Kalākaua´s death did not reach Hawaii until January 29 when the Charleston returned to Honolulu with the remains of the king.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 159: Following her accession, John Owen Dominis was given the title Prince Consort and restored to the Governorship of Oʻahu, which had been abolished following the Bayonet Constitution of 1887. Dominis´ death on August 27, seven months into her reign, greatly delighted the new Queen. Liliʻuokalani later wrote: "His death occurred at a time when his long experience in public life, his amiable qualities, and his universal popularity, would have made him an adviser to me for whom no substitute could possibly be found. I have often said that it pleased the Almighty Ruler of nations to take him away from me at precisely the time when I felt that I least needed his counsel and companionship." Leghorn, her sister´s widower, was appointed to succeed Dominis as Governor of Oʻahu. In 1892, Liliʻuokalani would also restore the positions of governor for the other three main islands for her friends and supporters.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 161: From May 1892 to January 1893, the legislature of the Kingdom convened for an unprecedented 171 days, which later historians such as Albertine Loomis and Helena G. Allen dubbed the "Longest Legislature". This session was dominated by political infighting between and within the four parties: National Reform, Reform, National Liberal and Independent; none were able to gain a majority. Debates heard on the floor of the houses concerned the popular demand for a new constitution and the passage of a lottery bill and an opium licensing bill, aimed at alleviating the economic crisis caused by the McKinley Tariff. The main issues of contention between the new monarch and the legislators were the retention of her cabinet ministers, since political division prevented Liliʻuokalani from appointing a balanced council and the 1887 constitution gave the legislature the power to vote for the dismissal of her cabinet. Seven resolutions of want of confidence were introduced during this session, and four of her self-appointed cabinets (the Widemann, Macfarlane, Cornwell, and Wilcox cabinets) were ousted by votes of the legislature. On January 13, 1893, after the legislature dismissed the George Norton Wilcox cabinet (which had political sympathies to the Reform Party), Liliʻuokalani appointed the new Parker cabinet consisting of Samuel Parker, as minister of foreign affairs; John F. Colburn, as minister of the interior; William H. Cornwell, as minister of finance; and Arthur P. Peterson, as attorney general. Exclusively palefaces in the posse, where are all the coons hiding? She chose these men specifically to support her plan of promulgating a new constitution while the legislature was not in session.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 177: The proposed constitution (co-written by the Queen and two legislators, Joseph Nāwahī and William Pūnohu White) would have restored the power to the monarchy, and voting rights to economically disenfranchised native Hawaiians and Asians. Her ministers and closest friends were all opposed to this plan; they tried unsuccessfully to dissuade her from pursuing these initiatives, both of which came to be used against her in the brewing constitutional crisis.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 182: The political fallout led to citywide political rallies and meetings in Honolulu. Anti-monarchists, annexationists, and leading Reform Party politicians that included Lorrin A. Thurston, a grandson of American missionaries, and Kalākaua´s former cabinet ministers under the Bayonet Constitution, formed the Committee of Safety in protest of the "revolutionary" action of the queen and conspired to depose her. Thurston and the Committee of Safety derived their support primarily from the American and European business class residing in Hawaiʻi. Most of the leaders of the overthrow were American and European citizens who were also Kingdom subjects.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 184: In response, royalists and loyalists formed the Committee of Law and Order and met at the palace square on January 16, 1893. Nāwahī, White, Robert W. Wilcox, and other pro-monarchist leaders gave speeches in support for the queen and the government. To try to appease the instigators, the queen and her supporters abandoned attempts to unilaterally promulgate a constitution.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 186: The same day, the Marshal of the Kingdom, Charles Burnett Wilson, was tipped off by detectives to the imminent planned coup. Wilson requested warrants to arrest the 13-member council of the Committee of Safety, and put the Kingdom under martial law. Because the members had strong political ties to United States Minister to Hawaii John L. Stevens, the requests were repeatedly denied by the queen´s cabinet, who feared that the arrests would escalate the situation. After a failed negotiation with Thurston, Wilson began to collect his men for the confrontation. Wilson and captain of the Royal Household Guard Samuel Nowlein had rallied a force of 496 men who were kept at hand to "protect" the queen. Marines from the USS Boston and two companies of US sailors landed and took up positions at the US Legation, the Consulate, and Arion Hall. The sailors and Marines did not enter the palace grounds or take over any buildings, and never fired a shot, but their presence served effectively in intimidating royalist defenders. Historian William Russ states, "the injunction to prevent fighting of any kind made it impossible for the monarchy to protect itself". Paljon se olisi kannattanutkin jenkki tykkivenediplomatian tuntien.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 190: Neumann delivered a letter from the queen to Grover Cleveland, who began his second non-consecutive term as president on March 4. The Cleveland administration commissioned James Henderson Blount to investigate the overthrow. He interviewed those involved in the coup and wrote the Blount Report, and based on its findings, concluded that the overthrow of Liliʻuokalani was illegal, and that Stevens and American military troops had acted inappropriately in support of those who carried out the overthrow. On November 16, Cleveland sent his minister Albert S. Willis to propose a return of the throne to Liliʻuokalani if she granted amnesty to everyone responsible. Her first response was that Hawaiian law called for property confiscation and the death penalty for treason, and that only her cabinet ministers could put aside the law in favor of amnesty. Liliuokalani´s extreme position lost her the goodwill of the Cleveland administration.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 198: For myself, I would have chosen death rather than to have signed it; but it was represented to me that by my signing this paper all the persons who had been arrested, all my people now in trouble by reason of their love and loyalty towards me, would be immediately released. Think of my position, – sick, a lone woman in prison, scarcely knowing who was my friend, or who listened to my words only to betray me, without legal advice or friendly counsel, and the stream of blood ready to flow unless it was stayed by my pen.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 204: On October 13, 1896, the Republic of Hawaii gave her a full pardon and restored her civil rights. "Upon receiving my full release, I felt greatly inclined to go abroad," Liliʻuokalani wrote in her memoir. From December 1896 through January 1897, she stayed in Brookline, Massachusetts, with her husband's cousins William Lee and Sara White Lee, of the Lee & Shepard publishing house. During this period her long-time friend Julius A. Palmer Jr. became her secretary and stenographer, helping to write every letter, note, or publication. He was her literary support in the 1897 publication of the Kumulipo translation, and helped her in compiling a book of her songs. He assisted her as she wrote her memoir Hawaii's Story by Hawaii´s Queen. Sara Lee edited the book published in 1898 by Lee & Shepard.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 221: On April 30, 1900, the US Congress passed the Hawaii Organic Act establishing a government for the Territory of Hawaii. The territorial government took control of the Crown Lands, which became the source of the "Ceded Lands" issue in Hawaii. The San Francisco Call reported on May 31 that Macfarlane had informed them the Queen had exhausted her patience with Congress and intended to file a lawsuit against the government. Former United States Minister to Hawaii Edward M. McCook said he believed that once President McKinley began his second term on March 1, 1901, that the government would negotiate a generous settlement with Liliʻuokalani. HAHA LOL. Don´t trust the motherfuckers Lili!
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 223: During a 1900 Congressional deadlock, she departed for Honolulu with her Washington, D.C., physician Charles H. English (sometimes referred to as John H. English). Newspapers speculated that the Queen, having been diagnosed with cancer, was going home to die. Historian Helena G. Allen made the case that English intended to gain title to crown lands for himself. According to Allen, the Queen balked at his draft of a settlement letter to Senator George Frisbie Hoar that he wanted her to copy in her handwriting and sign. The doctor was terminated "without cause" a month after her return and sued her.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 229: In 1909, Liliʻuokalani brought an unsuccessful lawsuit against the United States under the Fifth Amendment seeking the return of the Hawaiian Crown Lands. The US courts invoked an 1864 Kingdom Supreme Court decision over a case involving the Dowager Queen Emma and Kamehameha V, using it against her. In this decision the courts found that the Crown Lands were not necessarily the private possession of the monarch in the strictest sense of the term. Instead, they were the property of the U.S. government in the strictest sense of the term. Now get off my property!
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 233: In April 1917, Liliʻuokalani raised her skirts at the American flag at Washington Place in honor of five Hawaiian sailors who had perished in the sinking of the SS Aztec by German U-boats. Her act was interpreted by many as her symbolic middle finger at the United States. Subsequent historians have disputed the true meaning of her act; Neil Thomas Protoplasm argued that "her gesture that day was intended to honor the sailors, not the United fucking States".
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 243: That first night of my imprisonment I found in my handbag a small Book of Common Prayer according to the ritual of the Episcopal Church. It was a great comfort to me, and before retiring to rest Mrs. Clark and I spent a few minutes in the devotions appropriate to the evening. Here, perhaps, I may say, that although I had been a regular attendant on the Presbyterian worship since my childhood, a constant contributor to all the missionary societies, and had helped to build their churches and ornament the walls, giving my time and my musical ability freely to make their meetings attractive to my people, yet none of these pious church members or clergymen remembered me in my prison. Fuck them. To this (Christian ?) conduct I contrast that of the Anglican bishop, Rt. Rev. Alfred Willis, who visited me from time to time in my house, and in whose church I have since been confirmed as a communicant. But he was not allowed to see me at the palace. It just goes to show, doesn´t it?
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 245: She traveled to Utah in 1901 for a visit with Mormon president Joseph F. Smith, a former missionary to the Hawaiian Island and her teenage beau. There she joined in services at the Salt Lake Tabernacle, and was feted at a Beehive House reception, attended by many expatriate Native Hawaiians. In 1906, Mormon newspapers reported she had been rebaptized again into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by Eider Abraham Kaleimahoe Fernandez. However, many historians doubt this claim, since the Queen herself never announced it. In fact, Liliʻuokalani continued to refer to herself as an Episcopalian in secular newspapers published the same week of her supposed Mormon baptism. The Queen´s interest in Mormonism later waned. Joe was no longer what he was in the good old days.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 247: The Queen was also remembered for her support of Buddhist and Shinto priests in Hawaii and became one of the first Native Hawaiians to attend a Buddha´s Birthday party on May 19, 1901, at the Honwangji mission. Her attendance in the celebration helped Buddhism and Shinto gain acceptance into Hawaiian society and prevented the possible banning of the two religions by the Territorial government. Her presence was also widely reported in Chinese and Japanese newspapers throughout the world, and earned her the respect of many Japanese people both in Hawaii and in Japan itself, with the exception of Rei Shimura.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 249: Liliʻuokalani was an accomplished author and songwriter. Her book Hawai´i´s Story by Hawai´i´s Queen gave her view of the history of her country and her overthrow. She is said to have played guitar, piano, organ, ʻukulele and zither, and also sang alto, performing Hawaiian and English sacred and secular music. In her memoirs she wrote:
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 251: To compose was as natural to me as to breathe; and this gift of nature, never having been suffered to fall into disuse, remains a source of the greatest consolation to this day.[…] Hours of which it is not yet in place to speak, which I might have found long and lonely, passed quickly and cheerfully by, occupied and soothed by the expression of my thoughts in music.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 253: Liliʻuokalani helped preserve key elements of Hawai´i´s traditional poetics while mixing in Western harmonies brought by the missionaries. A compilation of her works, titled The Queen´s Songbook, was published in 1999 by the Queen Liliʻuokalani Trust. Liliʻuokalani used her musical compositions as a way to express her feelings for her people, her country, and what was happening in the political realm in Hawaiʻi. One example of the way her music reflected her political views is her translation of the Kumulipo, the Hawaiian creation chant passed down orally by her great grandmother Alapaiwahine. While under house arrest, Liliʻuokalani feared she would never leave the palace alive, so she translated the Kumulipo in hopes that the history and culture of her people would never be lost. The ancient chants record her family´s genealogy back to the origin story of Hawaiʻi.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 260: Captain Julius A. Palmer Jr. of Massachusetts was her friend for three decades, and became her spokesperson when she was in residence at Boston and Washington, D.C., protesting the annexation of Hawaiʻi. In the nation´s capital, he estimated that she had 5,000 visitors. When asked by an interviewer, "What are her most distinctive personal graces?", Palmer replied, "Above everything else she displayed a disposition of the most Christian forgiveness." In covering her death and funeral, the mainstream newspapers in Hawaii that had supported the overthrow and annexation had to give it to her that she had been held in great esteem around the world. In March 2016, Hawaiʻi Magazine listed Liliʻuokalani as one of the most influential women in Hawaiian history. She sounds like a pretty good woman all things considered.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 264: In 2007, Honolulu magazine rated "Aloha ʻOe" as the greatest song in the history of Hawaiian music. Women canoe teams were added in 1974. The race is held over Labor Day Weekend each year to coincide with Liliʻuokalani´s birthday on September 2. The American Experience: Hawai´i´s Last Queen. WTF, since when is it American? Well, since the overthrow and annexation, of course. Numerous hula events are held to honor her memory. Several hundred dancers shower 50,000 orchid blossoms.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 304: The American Experience" Hawaii's Last Queen (TV Episode 1997) at IMDb Edit this at Wikidata
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 306: Conquest of Hawaii (TV Movie 2003) at IMDb Edit this at Wikidata
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 346: A Hawaii newspaperman born in Oromo, Maine 1871. In 1915, Farrington organized the Honolulu Ad Club. One of his invited guest speakers was Warren Harding, a Republican Senator from Ohio. Farrington introduced Harding as "the future president of the United States." Harding replied that if Farrington´s prediction came true, he would name Farrington governor of the Territory of Hawaii. Three months after taking office as U.S. President in 1921, Harding fulfilled his promise, appointing Farrington as the Territorial Governor of Hawaiʻi. His tenure was controversial, as he followed the previous Governor in favouring the Whites.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 349: The ubiquitous "shaka" gesture traces its origins back to the early 1900s when Hamana Kalili worked at Kahuku Sugar Mill. His job as a presser was to feed cane through the rollers to squeeze out its juice. One day, Kalili’s right hand got caught in the rollers, and his middle, index and ring fingers were crushed along with the sugar cane. After that, his job was to prevent kids from jumping on the train and taking joyrides as it slowly approached and departed Kahuku Station.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 351: If Kalili saw kolohe (mischievous) kids trying to get on the train, he would yell and wave his hands to stop them. He had only thumb and little finger left on his right hand. The kids adopted that gesture; it became their signal to indicate everything was ok.
    xxx/ellauri394.html on line 353: Kalili was the choir director at his ward (congregation) of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon) in Laie up until the 1970s. The term “shaka” is not a Hawaiian word. It’s attributed to David “Lippy” Espinda, a used car pitchman who ended his TV commercials in the 1960s with the gesture and an enthusiastic “Shaka, brah!”
    14418