ellauri017.html on line 971: Esaiaan kirja ( heprea : ספר ישעיהו [ˈsɛ.fɛr jə.ʃaʕ.ˈjaː.hu] ) on ensimmäinen myöhemmistä profeetoista heprealaisessa Raamatussa ja ensimmäinen suurista profeetoista kristillisessä Vanhassa testamentissa. Se tunnistetaan yläkirjoituksesta 800 -luvulla eaa. eläneen profeetta Isaiah ben Amozin sanoiksi , mutta on todisteita siitä, että suuri osa siitä on sävelletty Babylonin vankeuden aikana ja myöhemmin. Johann Christoph Döderlein ehdotti vuonna 1775, että kirja sisälsi kahden profeetan teoksia, joita erottaa yli vuosisata, ja Bernhard Duhm sai aikaan näkemyksen, joka vallitsi suurimman osan 1900-luvulta yksimielisesti, että kirja sisältää kolme erillistä oraakkelikokoelmaa: Proto -Jesaiah ( luvut 1-39 ), joka sisältää 8. vuosisadalla eaa. profeetta Jesajan sanat; Deutero-Jesaiah ( luvut 40-55 ) , nimettömän 6. vuosisadalla eaa. kirjailijan työ, joka kirjoitti maanpaossa; ja Trito-Jesaiah ( luvut 56-66 ) , sävelletty maanpaosta palaamisen jälkeen. Jesaja 1–33 lupaa tuomion ja ennallistamisen Juudalle, Jerusalemille ja kansoille, ja luvuissa 34–66 oletetaan, että tuomio on julistettu ja ennallistaminen tapahtuu pian.Vaikka harvat tutkijat nykyään pitävät koko kirjan tai jopa suurimman osan siitä yhden henkilön ansioksi, kirjan olennainen yhtenäisyys on noussut revisionistisen tutkimuksen painopisteeksi.
ellauri029.html on line 920: Other passages in the Bible that use satire include Isaiah’s ridicule of idol-makers (Isaiah 40:19-20), God’s taunting of Egypt (Jeremiah 46:11), and Elijah’s gibes directed at the prophets of Baal (1 Kings 18:27). Jesus Himself used satire in the form of hyperbole when He told His hearers to “take the plank out of your own eye” (Matthew 7:5).
ellauri083.html on line 564: Isaiah 24:8
ellauri083.html on line 567: Isaiah 24:11
ellauri093.html on line 56: (Isaiah 21:5-9)
ellauri108.html on line 70: In the Tanakh, Yah occurs 50 times: 43 times in the Psalms, in Exodus 15:2; 17:16; and Isaiah 12:2; 26:4, as well as twice in Isaiah 38:11.
ellauri111.html on line 180: These include the Pseudepigrapha which contains Enoch, Michael the Archangel, and Jannes and Jambres. Many spurious books falsely claim to have been written by various Old Testament patriarchs. They were composed between 200 B.C. and 100 A.D. There are lots of these spurious books like The Assumption of Moses, Apocalypse of Elijah, and Ascension of Isaiah.
ellauri111.html on line 395: But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away. (Isaiah 64:6)
ellauri112.html on line 932: However, only the Bible is inspired and infallible. Only the Bible can be the rule of our faith and practice. Where the Bible is silent, we will seek to be silent as well. Where the Bible speaks, we will seek to yield faithful obedience. Where it contradicts the opinions of men, or the practices of churches, we will say, “To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them” (Isaiah 8:20).
ellauri119.html on line 279: וְר֣וּחַ קָדְשׁ֑וֹ (Ruah qadesow) – His Holy Spirit (Isaiah 63:10)[23]
ellauri119.html on line 287: ר֣וּחַ יְהוָ֑ה (Ruah YHWH) – Spirit of YHWH (Isaiah 11:2)[27]
ellauri119.html on line 289: ר֧וּחַ חָכְמָ֣ה וּבִינָ֗ה (Ruach hakmah ubinah) – Spirit of Wisdom and Understanding (Isaiah 11:2)[27]
ellauri119.html on line 291: ר֤וּחַ עֵצָה֙ וּגְבוּרָ֔ה (Ruah esah ugeburah) – Spirit of Counsel and Might (Isaiah 11:2)[27]
ellauri119.html on line 293: ר֥וּחַ דַּ֖עַת וְיִרְאַ֥ת יְהוָֽה (Ruah daat weyirat YHWH) – Spirit of Knowledge[28] and Fear of YHWH (Isaiah 11:2)[27
ellauri133.html on line 289: Kaksikymmentäseitsemän vuotta sen jälkeen, kun luusereiden klubi päihitti Pennywisen (Bill Skarsgård), luuserit ovat kukin omilla teillään. Mutta kun Derryssä alkaa jälleen kadota ihmisiä, Mike Hanlon (Isaiah Mustafa) kutsuu muut takaisin kotiin. Kovia kokeneen joukon on voitettava syvimmät pelkonsa kukistaakseen Pennywisen. Tosta näyttelijän nimestä voi päätellä et Mike Hanlon on neekeri. Ja onhan se! Onxe mutiainen myös Kurkon kirjassa? Täytyy tschekata.
ellauri163.html on line 341: Shiloh is generally understood as denoting the Messiah, "the peaceful one," as the word signifies ( Genesis 49:10 ). The Vulgate Version translates the word, "he who is to be sent," in allusion to the Messiah; the Revised Version, margin, "till he come to Shiloh;" and the LXX., "until that which is his shall come to Shiloh." It is most simple and natural to render the expression, as in the Authorized Version, "till Shiloh come," interpreting it as a proper name (Compare Isaiah 9:6 ).
ellauri164.html on line 437: "In this classic Catholic novel, Bernanos movingly recounts the life of a young French country priest who grows to understand his provincial parish while learning spiritual humility himself." Pro primo, ei se näytä koko aikana ymmärtävän tai edes välittävän kenestäkään juuri midiä. Pro secundo, koko kirja on yhtä nöyrän piiraan mutustelua. Siitä puhe mistä puute. This man shares something with Isaiah’s “worm among men.” Ich aber bin ein Wurm und kein Mensch. Ich bin eine Ratte (Psalmit 22:6).
ellauri164.html on line 900: “The smitten rock was a figure of Christ, and through this symbol the most precious spiritual truths are taught. As the life-giving waters flowed from the smitten rock, so from Christ, ‘smitten of God,’ ‘wounded for our transgressions,’ ‘bruised for our iniquities’ (Isaiah 53:4–5), the stream of salvation flows for a lost race. As the rock had been once smitten, so Christ was to be ‘once offered to bear the sins of many.’ Hebrews 9:28.” –Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 411
ellauri183.html on line 103: And Malamud himself -- still frail from a recent illness -- at first appears an improbable Isaiah. With his tidy demeanor, incessant self-editing ("no, wait, there's a better word . . . ") and deadpan, scrupulous style, he could be the most successful publican in Galilee. He is uneasy with talking about himself ("that kind of stuff, it's not up his alley," says his publicity-hungry "friend" Philip Roth) and seems reluctant to start. He pauses to choose among several pairs of glasses, then sits down carefully, feet flat on the floor, long fingers knitted in his lap. Finally, with the anxious geniality of a brave man settling in for root canals, he says, "Now then, I think we can begin."
ellauri184.html on line 353: Many of Jesus´ Jewish audience would have been reminded of Isaiah´s condemnation of Babylon in Isaiah 14:15: "But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit." Babylon may have been the definition of an evil city, and here Jesus is describing Capernaum as sharing the same fate. Kotiporukat ei ota sitä vakavasti. Sittenpähän ottavat, vitun homot.
ellauri185.html on line 77: Tyre is mentioned in the Book of Isaiah as being forgotten for 70 years, after which "she" would return to her lucrative prostitution and the profit would go to "those who live in the presence of the LORD".
ellauri198.html on line 633: Tophet or Topheth (Hebrew: תֹּוֹפֶת Tōp̄eṯ; Greek: Ταφέθ (taphéth); Latin: Topheth) is a location in Jerusalem in the Valley of Hinnom (Gehenna), where worshipers engaged in a ritual involving "passing a child through the fire", most likely child sacrifice. Traditionally, the sacrifices have been ascribed to a god named Moloch. The Bible condemns and forbids these sacrifices, and the tophet is eventually destroyed by king Josiah, although mentions by the prophets Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Isaiah suggest that the practices associated with the tophet may have persisted.
ellauri264.html on line 380: The term 'man of sorrows' is religious in nature and appears in Isaiah 53:3.
ellauri310.html on line 183: (jKr.) kreikkalainen kronikoitsija John Malalas kirjoitti Isaiahista, Rodoksen
ellauri342.html on line 561: Late in the 18th century, other printers began publishing the complete King James Bible. Isaac Collins printed his Bible in 1791; the Collins Bible became known as the first "Family Bible" printed in America. Isaiah Thomas published the first illustrated King James Bible in 1791.
ellauri370.html on line 167: It might be well, however, to inquire, What is sin ? What is the biblical definition of it ? We find the answer in the following language: " Whosoever committeth sin trans-gresseth also the law : for sin is the transgression of the law." Gresseth! The Jews did a lot of it. We quote the following from the Prophet Isaiah:
ellauri383.html on line 318: Isaiah 40:26 ESV / 47 helpful votes
ellauri383.html on line 324: Isaiah 13:10 ESV / 29 helpful votes
ellauri383.html on line 357: Isaiah 51:9 ESV / 2 helpful votes
ellauri383.html on line 360: Isaiah 47:13-14 ESV / 2 helpful votes
ellauri383.html on line 363: Isaiah 41:10 ESV / 2 helpful votes
ellauri383.html on line 366: Isaiah 34:7 ESV / 2 helpful votes
ellauri383.html on line 369: Isaiah 30:7 ESV / 2 helpful votes
ellauri383.html on line 372: Isaiah 9:6 ESV / 2 helpful votes
ellauri389.html on line 250: Positiivinen ja negatiivinen vapaus ovat Isaiah Berlinin esseessään Vapauden kaksi käsitettä (Two Concepts of Liberty, 1958) erittelemät yleiset vapauden määritelmät, joskin termit esiintyvät jo John Stuart Millillä. Klassinen yksinkertaistus positiivisen ja negatiivisen vapauden erosta on, että positiivisella vapaudella tarkoitetaan vapautta johonkin ja negatiivisella vapaudella vapautta jostakin.
ellauri389.html on line 253: Vapauden käsite on Quentin Patrickin korjaan Skinnerin tutkimusteema, jossa yhdistyvät useat hänen mielenkiintonsa kohteista: renessanssi, erityisesti Machiavelli, sekä Hobbes ja republikanistinen "ajattelu". Filosofinen keskustelu, johon Skinner vapaus-artikkeleillaan osallistuu, on Isaiah Berlinin ”Two Concepts of Liberty” -esseestä liikkeelle lähtenyt ajatustenvaihto.
ellauri389.html on line 256: Isaiah Berlin (Jesaja Berlins; 6. kesäkuuta 1909 Riika, Liivinmaan kuvernementti, Venäjän keisarikunta – 5. marraskuuta 1997 Oxford, Englanti) oli latvialaissyntyinen brittiläinen filosofi ja aatehistorioitsija. Häntä pidetään 1900-luvun merkittävimpiin kuuluvana aatehistorioitsijoita. Arvaa oliko hän esinahaton? Kyl-lä! Isaiah Berlin syntyi Riiassa vuonna 1909 keskiluokkaiseen chabad-lubavitch juutalaiseen perheeseen. Isaiah oli liikemiesisän ja kotiäidin ainoa lapsi. Perhe muutti vuonna 1916 Pietariin. Kun bolševikit nousivat Venäjällä valtaan, juutalaiset Berlinit kokivat olonsa vaikeaksi. Perhe sai vuonna 1920 latvialaisina luvan muuttaa takaisin Riikaan, mistä he muuttivat seuraavana vuonna Britanniaan.
ellauri389.html on line 259:
ellauri390.html on line 91: Antti Tuuri sai Finlandia-palkinnon Lassi Nummelta v 1997, samana vuonna kuin kuoli Isaiah Berlin. Lassi Nummi oli raamatunkäännöskomitean asiantuntija. You win some, lose some, you can't win them all.
ellauri390.html on line 148: Antti Tuuri on 1 sellainen, ja sen kirja Ameriikan raitti kertomus korruptiosta ja kusetuxesta izekkyyden nimissä oikeistohenkisellä Pohjanmaalla. Juipit peukuttaa Isaiah Berlinin negatiivista vapautta olla maxamatta veroja. Muilutettuja rahoja eri pankeissa ja tiine vaimo mattokäärössä. Taistoa ei voi jättää kaxistaan rahakapsekin kanssa, saattaa vetää välistä. Jo on urheita suomalaisia sotureita omaa puolta pitämässä. Amerikan puolella olis kaikki hauskempaa ja vapaampaa, saa ajaa kuuden kupin kumarassa koska norminpurku on siellä paljon pitemmällä. Taistolla oli sitäpaizi kahvikupillinen bashkiirin spermaa suonissa eli se on osa-aikamustalainen.
ellauri392.html on line 95: Professor Hirsch introduced the literature of the Holocaust to the Brown University curriculum in 1983, and he taught courses in Holocaust memoir, song, poetry, and fiction. In collaboration with his wife Roslyn, a survivor of the Tarnopol Ghetto, he translated Justyna's Narrative, a Polish Holocaust memoir by Gusta Davidson Draenger, and Auschwitz: True Tales from a Grotesque Land, by Sara Nomberg-Przytyk. He also translated from Yiddish Ghetto Kingdom, the stories of Isaiah Spiegel; the poetry of Abraham Sutzkever (paasattu); and Aleksander Kulisiewicz’s songs from the Nazi death camps. Professor Hirsch died in 1999 and was survived by his wife Roslyn and son Joe, the only two Hirsch survivors. He had been hospitalized for several weeks for intestinal surgery, his family said. Well, actually, he was survived by his wife; a daughter, Helene Wingens of West Caldwell, N.J.; a son, Joseph, of Brooklyn; a sister, Rosalyn Suchow of Fort Lee, N.J., and two grandchildren.
ellauri412.html on line 55: The second Isaiah section, Deutero-Isaiah, was likely written by an anonymous writer (or writers) in the Sixth century BCE when the Jewish people were in exile. This is a time jump of approximately 150 years; the city of Jerusalem has already been destroyed and the people are living in captivity. It is not likely that Proto Isaiah was acquainted with Lälli Kooros the Second, four-wheel drive cherubs notwithstanding. Ne jotka kannattavat näkemystä kolmesta kirjoittajasta, jakavat kirjan toisen kerran luvun 55 kohdalta. Heidän mukaansa Tritojesaja on lisännyt kirjaan vielä Babylonin episodin jälkeen fan fiction tyyppisiä siikveleitä.
ellauri412.html on line 62: Isaiahs-wife-pin.jpg?ssl=1" width="40%" />
ellauri412.html on line 64: I met a sweet gal named Jerusha. Upon hearing her name, I squealed, “I’ve never met a Jerusha!!”  She looked rather startled. (I do that to people sometimes.) “You know who Jerusha is?”  “Of course! She’s King Uzziah’s wife in the Bible.”  This sweet girl smiled and confessed she’d stumped many Bible nerds with her name. I wouldn’t have known either unless I’d been studying Isaiah and the kings who reigned during his ministry.  Here’s another woman I’ve read over at least a dozen times–Ahinoam. I knew one of David’s wives was Ahinoam, but did you know King Saul’s wife was also named Ahinoam? Aha! Got you there! And what about Job’s wife? Scripture doesn’t even name her. We only know her as the crotchety old gal that gripes at her suffering husband. The shepherd girl in Solomon’s Song of Songs is another one who gets no name. At least we know she was loved. And how! Isaiah’s wife is another woman mentioned but given no name.
ellauri412.html on line 197: As I mentioned, God doesn't like the worship of Asherah, and He is pretty adamant about it (well, 'hard' is perhaps not the word to use). In the Bible you know something is important if it is repeated, when Jesus said "Truly, truly I say to you" or "Amen, amen I say to you" depending on the bible version (John 12:24) He means 'This is the TRUTH - listen up.' and again when the angels sing that God is "Holy Holy Holy" (Isaiah 6:3) there should be no question in your mind that God is in fact Holy. So when you see that shrine prostitution worshiping Asherah is mentioned about 40 times in the Old Testament, and every single time it's in a very negative context, you know God is not happy with that idea. No sir, he is mad as Hell.
ellauri412.html on line 521: Anteeksipyytelevä professori Usko uskoo Theologiaan.  R. L. Solberg (talli) 5 vuotta sitten. Isaiah. Usein kutsuttu "kielletty luku", Isaiah 53 on merkittävä kiistan lähde. Ei vain juutalaisen ja kristinuskon välillä, vaan jopa itse juutalaisimisen sisällä. Kunnes Kristus tuli, juutalaiset juutalaiset ja rabbit sopivat ympäriin pukeutuneena siihen, että Jesaja 53 oli ennusti Messiaan. Mutta kun kristillinen evankeliumi alkoi levitä, tämä luku Jesajassa alkoi aiheuttaa ongelmia juutalaisuudessa, koska se muistutti avoimesti Jeshuan (Jesus) elämää ja työtä Messiaana.
ellauri412.html on line 523: Eitan Bar, syntyperäinen juutalais-Israelin tutkija: 1600-luvun juutalainen historioitsija Raphael Levi myönsi, että kauan sitten rabbit lukivat Isaiah 53 synagogassa, mutta kun luvun jälkeen tuli "argumentit ja suuri hämmennys", rabbit päättivät, että yksinkertaisin asia olisi vain ottaa tämä ennuste pos profeettojen (Haftarot)  lukemistosta synagogissa. Siksi tänään, kun luemme Jesaja 52, pysähdymme luvun puolivälissä, ja sitä seuraavalla viikolla hyppäämme suoraan Jesajaan 54:2.
ellauri412.html on line 525: Ei ole ihme, että kun vuoropuhelen juutalaisten ystävieni kanssa, Isaian 53. luku on yleinen aihe. Äskettäisessä keskustelussa erään ystävän kanssa, joka kääntyi kristinuskosta juutalaisikseen, hän jakoi kanssani meemin, jonka hän tunsi tiivistäneen juutalaisen kannan Isaiah-luvussa 53:
ellauri412.html on line 527: Sitten hän luetteli 12 syytä, joista Isaiah 53 ei voinut viitata Jeesukseen. Hän ei maininnut alkuperäistä lähdettä, mutta perustelut näyttävät olevan peräisin Hugh Fogelmanin kirjasta Christianity Uncovered: Viewed Through Open Eyes. Luin listan läpi ja tunsin, että minun oli punnittava ja yritiä tehdä ennätyksen suoriksi. Ei vain puolustaa kristillistä kantaa Isaiah 53: ssa, vaan myös eduksi juutalaisille ystävilleni, jotka haluavat vahvistaa asemaansa eivätkä luota heikkoihin argumentteihin.
ellauri412.html on line 536: Vastaus: Heprealainen lause ”ins makavot” voi viitata hervahtaneeseen miehuuteen, jolla on tapana oireilla kivusta tai kärsimyksestä sekä sairaudesta. Se riippuu asiayhteyhteyhteydessä, ja jopa ortodoksijuutalainen Raamattu kääntää Isaiah 53:3:n lauseen ”tarttuvaksi”, ei ”tavallisesti sairaaksi”. On olemassa runsas raamatullinen tuki Jeesuksen kärsimykseen perehtynyksen täyttämisen kannalta (Matt 27:27-44, Mark 15:16-32, Luukas 23:26-39, 2 Kor 1:5 jne.)
ellauri412.html on line 614: Vastaus: Näihin kahteen väitteeän voidaan vastata yhdessä. Molemmat viittaavat Isaiah 53:9:n ensimmäiseen osaan, jossa sanotaan: ”Hänetille annettiin hauta jumalattomaan kanssa, ja rikkaan kuolemastaan...” Mielessä profetian genre, jossa on symboliikka ja kuvaannolliset kielet, tämä profetia voidaan pitää toteutuksena siitä, että Jeesus teloitettiin ja haudattiin rikollisten kanssa, kunnes rikas mies, Joosef Arimatista, astui sisään ja tarjosi hautaansa, kuten kertovat Mark 15:43, Luke 23:51, John 19:38 ja MacArthurin muistiinpanot: Hänen häpeällisen teloitusnsa vuoksi rikollisten rinnalla juutalaisjohtajat aikoivat Jeesuksen olevan häpeällisen hautaamisen (cf. Johannes 19:31), mutta sen sijaan Hänet haudattiin "rikkaiden" kanssa kunniakkaassa hautaamisessa rikkaan Joosefin lahjoittaman Haudan kautta Arimatan rikkaan Joosefin haudan kautta.
ellauri412.html on line 637: On olemassa syy, miksi Isaiah 53: n runo esitellään ilmaisulla "hyvä uutinen", ja on myös hyvä syy, miksi kaikki neljä tarinaa Jeesuksesta Uudessa testamentissa kutsuttiin lopulta "Hyvää uutista" tai "Epäinhimillistä". Se on oudoin hyvä uutinen, jonka koskaan kuulet, mutta myös parhaat uutiset. Se on tarina Jumalan pahan voittauksesta, jotta teidät ja minä sinut voidaan pelastaa inhimillisestä tilasta, kuolemasta, jota näemme kaikkialla ympärillämme, ja siitä, jonka löydämme itsestämme. Tässä palvelijan kuolemasta ja ylösnousemuksesta saamme selville Jumalan rakkauden, joka johtaa todelliseen elämään.
ellauri412.html on line 641: JOSH: The book of Isaiah CLEARLY indicates in previous sections that the whole of Israel is the servant being described. If you only read the 53rd chapter, then I understand viewing Jesus as being described. This isn’t the correct way to read any book though. Israel is the servant, and this is in no way a prophecy of a coming messiah.
ellauri412.html on line 643: Vastaus: Josh. I agree that in the full book of Isaiah we cannot simply say that the suffering servant always equals Yeshua. Prophetic literature is a difficult genre, for sure. There are passages where Isaiah clearly refers to the nation of Israel, and other times he is clearly referring to an individual, Cyrus. It´s only in the forbidden chapter that it talks of our particular HaMashiach.
ellauri412.html on line 653: The NAU of Isaiah 53 translates the Hebrew words “zerah” and “tseetsa” as “offspring” and in the immediate context of each, only “biological” offspring is meant. You are thus forced to argue that the meaning of zerah in Isaiah 53:10 is an exception to the rule.
ellauri412.html on line 655: What would be unreasonable in the skeptic who says “offspring” in Isaiah 53:10 means only naturalistic biological offspring, so because Jesus didn’t have any naturalistic biological children, he is not the suffering servant of Isaiah 53?
ellauri412.html on line 657: How do you know the canonical gospel authors weren’t simply creating fictions about Jesus to make him sound more like the suffering servant of Isaiah 53 than he really was? Of course you will tout the historical reliability of the gospels, but I would provide scholarly resistance to that conclusion every step of the way. The question is not whether YOU can be reasonable to see Jesus as the Isaiah 53 servant but whether skeptics can  reasonably deny this allegation.
ellauri412.html on line 659: Vastaus: Kiitos, Barry. Arvostan ajatuksiasi, vaikka ne ovat hanurista. Jos ottaa Uuden testamentin olla inspiroitunut Jumalan Sana (mitä minä teen), niin voidaan varmasti luottaa NT:n kirjoittavien tulkindoihin ymmärtääkseen oikein Isaiah 53: n. (Senko NT on pohjimmiltaan OT:n innoitettu kommentaari.) Katsottuna tässä yhteydessä – ja ottaen huomioon, ettJesaja 52:13-53 : 15 on profeetallista runoutta – näyttää tarkimmalta tulkita זֶ֖רַע (ze-ra, ”ulkonkussa”) vuonna 53:10 vertaphorically. Shalom! RLS (englanniksi)
ellauri412.html on line 676: Look, if you’re reading the Bible as an atheist and asking about a reasonable interpretation, then the world is your oyster. You are not required to accept the worldview of the authors of the Bible, who all believed in God and wrote about Him from that perspective. And at the same time, as someone who does not believe God exists and does not accept the inspired nature or inerrancy of scripture, you have limited your possible interpretations of Scripture to only natural explanations that do not invoke God. This is going to cause significant problems with your use of the historical-grammatical method, which strives to discover the biblical author’s original intended meaning in the text. For example, every time Isaiah writes, “thus says the Lord” (which is a lot!), how will you interpret that? For an atheist, a statement like that either makes Isiah delusional (he believed a non-existent God told him something) or a charlatan (he’s knowingly asserting a false attribution).
ellauri412.html on line 678: Either way, why dig in your heels about a single verse? Without a belief in God, Isaiah’s “suffering servant” could be referring to anything. Maybe he was writing about his crazy uncle who gave up his life for a neighboring tribe. Or maybe he was writing about aliens from another planet. Or maybe it is pure fiction from the mind of a delusional believer in a non-existent God. The one thing you are not allowed to reasonably conclude if you are an atheist is that Isaiah, as a prophet, was recording a message revealed to him God. Which is exactly what Isaiah would have thought he was writing at the time.
xxx/ellauri068.html on line 563: Ei pidä sekottaa Isaiah Berliniin, joka oli joko 1) 1700-luvun rabbi tai 2) 1900-luvun brittifilosofi. 2) syntyi Latviassa. Ei oikein selviä mistä se oli hyvä, paizi verraton kermaperse ja antikommunisti. Ei vaivautunut edes kirjoittamaan, sihteerit otti höpinät Grundig-nauhurille ja purki siitä.
xxx/ellauri068.html on line 565: Isaiah Berlin was often described, especially in his old age, by means of superlatives: the world's greatest talker, the century's most inspired reader, one of the finest minds of our time. Sir Isaiah radiated well-being.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 180: Shestov was highly admired and honored by Nikolai Berdyaev and Sergei Bulgakov in Russia, Jules de Gaultier, Georges Bataille, Lucien Lévy-Bruhl, Paul Celan, Gilles Deleuze, and Albert Camus in France, and D. H. Lawrence, Isaiah Berlin and John Middleton Murry in England. Among Jewish thinkers, he influenced Hillel Zeitlin.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 288: I think it’s reasonable to expect prophecies that have only been partially fulfilled in history to have their ultimate fulfilment in our future. The idea that a partial historical fulfilment points to a complete future fulfilment is a well established principle in the Bible. Two examples we’ve reviewed recently are Isaiah 17 and Psalm 83. The literal and complete fulfilment of these prophecies has not happened yet.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 299: I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times what is still to come. I say, My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please (Isaiah 46:10).
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 352: And concerning the time of the 2nd coming, Isaiah wrote: Who is this coming from Edom, from Bozrah, with his garments stained crimson? Who is this, robed in splendor, striding forward in the greatness of his strength? “It is I, proclaiming victory, mighty to save.” Why are your garments red, like those of one treading the winepress? “I have trodden the winepress alone; from the nations no one was with me. I trampled them in my anger and trod them down in my wrath; their blood spattered my garments, and I stained all my clothing. It was for me the day of vengeance; the year for me to redeem had come. I looked, but there was no one to help, I was appalled that no one gave support; so my own arm achieved salvation for me, and my own wrath sustained me. I trampled the nations in my anger; in my wrath I made them drunk and poured their blood on the ground”
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 353: (Isaiah 63:1-6).
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 359: These prophecies help us understand how Edom, Moab, and Ammon could escape the clutches of the anti-Christ. The Lord has chosen Petra as the city of refuge where He will protect His people throughout the Great Tribulation. In doing so, He will make sure the whole area stays out of the hands of His enemy. It also explains why, when He returns, He will first go to Edom to clear the way for His people to return to Jerusalem (Isaiah 63:1-6).
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 373: For the Lord has a day of vengeance, a year of retribution, to uphold Zion’s cause. Edom’s streams will be turned into pitch, her dust into burning sulfur; her land will become blazing pitch! It will not be quenched night or day; its smoke will rise forever. From generation to generation it will lie desolate; no one will ever pass through it again. The desert owl and screech owl will possess it; the great owl and the raven will nest there. God will stretch out over Edom the measuring line of chaos and the plumb line of desolation (Isaiah 34:5-11).
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 375: Isaiah’s descriptive language calls up images of hell itself and has led more than one commentator to suggest Edom as the location of the Lake of Fire, where the unbelievers of all ages will spend eternity in torment.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 384: A: The Iranians are the modern day Persians who originated in Elam, not Edom. Edom was the birthplace of the Ammonites and the Moabites and was later inhabited by the family of Esau, Jacob’s brother. Edom got its name from Esau, and is called Jordan today. Elam was located further east on the other side of Iraq, where Iran is today. Obadiah prophesied against the Edomites who were driven out of their capital (Petra) by the Nabateans, a Bedouin people descended from Ishmael, in fulfillment of Obadiah’s prophecy. Many believe that during the Great Tribulation, the Jordanians will hide believing Jews in Petra where God will protect them against the anti-Christ. The area is called Bosrah in Isaiah 63.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 688: he Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches that a significant portion of its members are descended from or adopted into the tribe of Ephraim, believing that they are charged with restoring the lost tribes in the latter days, as prophesied by Isaiah. Along with members of the tribe of Judah, members of the tribe of Ephraim are believed to be playing an important leadership roles for covenant Israel in the last days. Members' lineage is declared through patriarchal blessings.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 124: "Through the wrath of the LORD of hosts is the land darkened, and the people shall be as the fuel of the fire: no man shall spare his brother. And he shall snatch on the right hand, and be hungry; and he shall eat on the left hand, and they shall not be satisfied: they shall eat every man the flesh of his own arm." -- Isaiah 9:19-20
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 126: "And I will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh; and they shall be drunken with their own blood, as with sweet wine." -- Isaiah 49:26
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 175: It should not come to one’s mind that in the days of the Messiah anything in the customary order of the world will be annulled, or that there will be something new in the order of Creation. For the world will continue in its path. And that which Isaiah said, the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid (Isa. 11:6), is but an allegory and a riddle. The true meaning of it is that Israel will dwell in safety with the wicked of the idolaters who are likened to a wolf and a leopard….And all of them will return to faith of truth, and they will neither rob nor despoil, but will eat the things which are permitted, in pleasure, together with Israel, as it is written, The lion shall eat straw like the ox (Isa. 11:7). And likewise, all the similar things said about the Messiah are but allegories. And in the days of the Messiah it will become known to everybody what thing the allegory signified and to what thing it alluded.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 209: The fifth house [in the heavenly Paradise] is built of onyx and jasper stones, and inlaid stones, and silver and gold, and good pure gold. And around it are rivers of balsam, and before its door flows the River Gihon. And [it has] a canopy of all trees of incense and good scent. And[in it are] beds of gold and silver, and embroidered garments. And there sits Messiah ben David and Elijah and Messiah ben Ephraim. And there is a canopy of incense trees as in the Sanctuary which Moses made in the desert. And all its vessels and pillars are of silver, its covering is gold, its seat is purple. And in it is Messiah ben David who loves Jerusalem. Elijah of blessed memory takes hold of his head, places it in his lap and holds it, and says to him: “Endure the sufferings and the sentence of your Master who makes you suffer because of the sin of Israel.” And thus it is written; He was wounded because of our transgressions, he was crushed because of our iniquities (Isaiah 53:5) until the time when the comes. (“Midrash Konen” BhM 2:29-30)[13]
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 274: 2 Now it shall come to pass in the latter days That the foreskin mountain of the Lord´s house Shall be established on the top of the mountains, And shall be exalted above the hills; And all nations shall flow to it. 3 Many people shall come and say, "Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, To the house of the God of Jacob; He will teach us His ways, And we shall walk in His paths." For out of Zion shall go forth the law, And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. Isaiah 2:2-3
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 276: 7 Of the increase of His government and peace There will be no end, Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom, To order it and establish it with judgment and justice From that time forward, even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this Isaiah 9:7
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 221: Shall laugh - Will smile at their vain attempts, maybe even sneer; will not be disturbed or agitated by their efforts; will go calmly on in the execution of his purposes. Compare as above Isaiah 18:4. See also Proverbs 1:26; Psalm 37:13; Psalm 59:8. This is, of course, to be regarded as spoken after the manner of men, and it means that God will go steadily forward in the accomplishment of his purposes. There is included also the idea that he will look with contempt on their vain and futile efforts.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 343: The Ruch Ah Qudsh is the spirit or character aspect of Yahuah, and therefore a part of Yahuah (Isaiah 40:13). The Ruach is pictured allegorically throughout the Tanakh as the feminine or motherly aspect of Yahuah, and is also synonymous with wisdom, as depicted in the Proverbs where wisdom says, "Yahuah possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was." (Proverbs 8:22,23) The phrase, "YHUH possessed me", indicates that wisdom is the Ruach, or the bride, especially since wisdom is portrayed as feminine.
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 228: Isaiah 40:7 The grass withers and the flowers fall when ...
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 309: Isaiah 16:14 But now the Lord speaks, saying, “Within three years, as a hired man would count them, the glory of Moab will be degraded along with all his great population, and his remnant will be very small and impotent.”
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 235: The Edict of Restoration, a proclamation attested by a cylinder seal in which Cyrus authorized and encouraged the return of the Israelites to the Land of Israel following his conquest of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, is described in the Bible and likewise left a lasting legacy on the Jewish religion due to his role in ending the Babylonian captivity and facilitating the Jewish return to Zion. According to Isaiah 45:1 of the Hebrew Bible, God anointed Cyrus for this task, even referring to him as a messiah (lit. 'anointed one'); Cyrus is the only non-Jewish figure in the Bible to be revered in this capacity.
xxx/ellauri287.html on line 362: (Isaiah 14:12-14, NIV, Jude 1:6, NIV))
xxx/ellauri287.html on line 380: (Isaiah 6:1-8 )
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 432: Savior: Despite the fact that the Tanakh provides the record of God's deliverance of His people, the word moshia' (a participial form of the verb yasha, to deliver or to save) does not occur with great frequency in the Scriptures (it appears nearly half of the time in the latter part of the book of Isaiah).
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1018: He creates, not by sexual union or cooperation, but by the effortless, self-sufficient, raw power of his word. “I am the LORD, who made all things, who alone stretched out the heavens, who spread out the earth by myself.” (Isaiah 44:24)
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1028: “My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all my purpose.” (Isaiah 46:10)
88