ellauri037.html on line 491: §. 362.

ellauri037.html on line 494: §. 363.

ellauri037.html on line 497: §. 364.

ellauri037.html on line 500: §. 365.

ellauri037.html on line 505: §. 366.

ellauri037.html on line 514: §. 367.

ellauri037.html on line 517: §. 368.

ellauri037.html on line 520: §. 369.

ellauri037.html on line 527: §. 370.

ellauri037.html on line 538: §. 371.

ellauri158.html on line 76: P.1. defin. 2. Ea res dicitur in suo genere finita, quae alia eiusdem naturae terminari potest. [in: P. 1. prop. 8., prop. 21., etiam in: Ep. 4. §. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 82: P.1. defin. 3. Per substantiam intelligo id quod in se est et per se concipitur; hoc est id, cuius conceptus non indiget conceptu alterius rei, a quo formari debeat. [in: P. 1. prop. 1., prop. 2., prop. 4., prop. 5., prop. 6. coroll., prop. 10., prop. 15., prop. 18., prop. 28., etiam in: Ep. 26. §. 6., Ep. 27. §. 8.]
ellauri158.html on line 84: P.1. defin. 4. Per attributum intelligo id quod intellectus de substantia percipit, tanquam eiusdem essentiam constituens. [in: P. 1. prop. 4., prop. 9., prop. 10., prop. 12., prop. 19., prop. 20., P. 2. prop. 1. schol., etiam in: Ep. 27. §. 8.]
ellauri158.html on line 95: P.1. defin. 6. Per Deum intelligo ens absolute infinitum, hoc est, substantiam constantem infinitis attributis, quorum unumquodque aeternam et infinitam essentiam exprimit. [in: P. 1. prop. 10. schol., prop. 11., prop. 14., prop. 14. coroll. 1., prop. 16., prop. 19., prop. 23., prop. 31., P. 2. prop. 1., prop. 1. schol., prop. 45., P. 4. prop. 28., P. 5. prop. 35., etiam in: Ep. 3. §. 1., Ep. 4. §. 2., Ep. 26. §. 8., Ep. 64. §. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 117: P. 1. axiom. 2. Id quod per aliud non potest concipi, per se concipi debet. [in: Ep. 3. §. 4.]
ellauri158.html on line 133: P. 1. axiom. 6. Idea vera debet cum suo ideato convenire. [in: P. 1. prop. 5., prop. 30., P. 2. prop. 29., prop. 32., prop. 44., prop. 44. coroll. 2., etiam in: Ep. 66. §. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 145: P. 1. prop. 1. Substantia prior est natura suis affectionibus. [in: P. 1. prop. 5., etiam in: Ep. 3. §. 4.]
ellauri158.html on line 150: P. 1. prop. 2. Duae substantiae diversa attributa habentes nihil inter se commune habent. [in: P. 1. prop. 6., prop. 11., prop. 12., etiam in: Ep. 3. §. 4.]
ellauri158.html on line 154: P. 1. prop. 3. Quae res nihil commune inter se habent, earum una alterius causa esse non potest. [in: P. 1. prop. 6., etiam in: Ep. 3. §. 4., Ep. 65. §. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 166: P. 1. prop. 5. In rerum natura non possunt dari duae aut plures substantiae eiusdem naturae sive attributi. [in: P. 1. prop. 6., prop. 8., prop. 12., prop. 13., prop. 14., prop. 15. schol., P. 2. prop. 10. schol., lem. 1., etiam in: Ep. 3. §. 7.]
ellauri158.html on line 170: P. 1. prop. 6. Una substantia non potest produci ab alia substantia. [in: P. 1. prop. 6. coroll., prop. 11. schol., prop. 12., etiam in: Ep. 3. §. 7., Ep. 4. §. 8.]
ellauri158.html on line 174: P. 1. prop. 7. Ad naturam substantiae pertinet existere. [in: P. 1. prop. 8., prop. 8. schol. 1., prop. 8. schol. 2., prop. 11., prop. 12., prop. 19., P. 2. prop. 10., etiam in: Ep. 4. §. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 180: -- P. 1. prop. 8. schol. 2. Substantiae et earum modificationes. [in: P. 1. prop. 15. schol., etiam in: Ep. 4. §. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 188: P. 1. prop. 10. Unumquodque unius substantiae attributum per se concipi debet. [in: P. 1. prop. 12., P. 2. prop. 5., prop. 6., etiam in: Ep. 66. §. 4., Ep. 68. §. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 189: -- P. 1. prop. 10. schol. Substantiarum et attributorum distinctio. [in: P. 1. prop. 14. coroll. 1., etiam in: Ep. 26. §. 7., Ep. 27. §. 6., Ep. 65. §. 3., Ep. 66. §. 7.]
ellauri158.html on line 270: -- P. 1. prop. 25. schol. Deus est causa sui et omnium rerum causa. [in: Ep. 66. §. 6.]
ellauri158.html on line 271: -- P. 1. prop. 25. coroll. Res particulares nihil sunt nisi Dei attributorum affectiones, sive modi, quibus Dei attributa certo et determinato modo exprimuntur. [in: P. 1. prop. 25. schol., prop. 28., prop. 36., P. 2. defin. 1., prop. 1., prop. 5., prop. 10. coroll., P. 3. prop. 6., P. 5. prop. 24., prop. 36., etiam in: Ep. 66. §. 6.]
ellauri158.html on line 410: P. 2. prop. 6. Cuiuscumque attributi modi Deum, quatenus tantum sub illo attributo, cuius modi sunt, et non quatenus sub ullo alio consideratur, pro causa habent. [in: P. 2. prop. 9., lem. 3., prop. 45., P. 3. prop. 2., prop. 11. schol., P. 4. prop. 7., prop. 29., etiam in: Ep. 66. §. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 423: -- P. 2. prop. 7. schol. Substantia cogitans et substantia extensa una eademque est substantia. [in: P. 2. prop. 8., prop. 12. schol., prop. 21. schol., P. 3. prop. 2. schol., etiam in: Ep. 66. §. 4., Ep. 67. §. 1., Ep. 68. §. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 461: P. 2. prop. 13. Obiectum ideae humanam mentem constituentis est corpus, sive certus extensionis modus actu existens, et nihil aliud. [in: P. 2. prop. 15., prop. 19., prop. 21., prop. 21. schol., prop. 23., prop. 24., prop. 26., prop. 29., prop. 38., prop. 39., P. 3. prop. 3., prop. 10., gener. aff. defin., P. 5. prop. 23., prop. 29., etiam in: Ep. 66. §. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 479: [in: P. 2. lem. 3., lem. 4., etiam in: Ep. 63. §. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 526: ------ schol. [in: Ep. 66. §. 8.]
ellauri158.html on line 776: P. 3. prop. 7. Conatus, quo unaquaeque res in suo esse perseverare conatur, nihil est praeter ipsius rei actualem essentiam. [in: P. 3. prop. 9., prop. 10., prop. 37., prop. 54., P. 4. defin. 8., prop. 4., prop. 5., prop. 8., prop. 15., prop. 18., prop. 18. schol., prop. 20., prop. 21., prop. 22., prop. 25., prop. 26., prop. 32., prop. 33., prop. 53., prop. 60., prop. 64., P. 5. axiom. 2., prop. 8., prop. 9., prop. 25., etiam in: Ep. 66. §. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 984: P. 4. praef. [in: P. 4. defin. 2., prop. 39., prop. 59., prop. 65., etiam in: TIE §. 12.]
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 101: 21. The Knowledg of the First Attesters is ascertain’d by what has been prov’d. §. §. 15.16. Their Veracity must be prov’d by shewing there could be no Apparent Good to move their Wills to deceive us; and the best proof (omitting the Impossibility of joyning in such an Universal Conspiracy to deceive, the Certain loss of their Credit to tell a Lie against Notorious Matters of Fact &c.) is the seen Impossibility of Compassing their Immediate End, which was to Deceive. Which reason is grounded on this, that no one man, who is not perfectly Frantick, acts for an End that he plainly sees Impossible to be compassed. For example, to fly to the Moon (LOL), or to swim over Thames upon a Pig of Lead. (Except a really Big Hollow Pig of Lead.)
xxx/ellauri252.html on line 363: »1.§. Joca aicomuxesta, sanoilla eli kirjoituxilla, laitta ja pilcka Jumalata, hänen Pyhä Sanans ja Sacramentejä; olcon hengens rickonut. Jos se tapahtu ajattelemattomasti ja picaisudesta, ja hän catu; wetäkön sackoa sata talaria, ja rucoilcan ricoxens julkisesti Seuracunnasa andexi. Jos hän sitä teke toisen erän; tehkön cahdenkertaisen sacon. Joca ei woi sackoa maxaa; kärsikön ruumillans, nijncuin Rangaistus Caaresa sanotan.»
36