ellauri046.html on line 809: From Adam till now, has with wretchedness strove;
ellauri078.html on line 286: We passed the School, where Children strove Me mentiin koulun ohi, missä lapset
ellauri098.html on line 633: Myers-Briggsin tyyppi-indikaattorilla on voimakas korrelaatio Big Five-tyypityksen kanssa. Big Fiven OCEAN-asteikolla korkeaa Openness-lukemaa vastaa N (intuitio) ja matalaa S (tosiasiallinen); korkeaa Conscientiousness-lukemaa vastaa J (harkitseva) ja matalaa P (spontaani); korkeaa Extroversion-lukemaa vastaa E (ekstrovertti) ja matalaa I (introvertti), ja korkeaa Agreeableness-lukemaa vastaa F (tunteva) ja matalaa T (ajatteleva). Neuroottisuusakselia MBTI:ssa ei ole.
ellauri098.html on line 639: I, introvertti – E, ekstrovertti: asenne ympäristöön

ellauri098.html on line 648: Ekstrovertti (E) tuntee todennäköisesti olonsa kotoisammaksi ihmisten ja asioiden kanssa ulkomaailmassa kuin ideoiden sisäisessä maailmassa, "ulospäinsuuntautunut".
ellauri098.html on line 664: Huomattakoon, että piirretestien "ekstrovertti" kuvaa enemmänkin eräänlaista sosiaalisuutta, kun taas MBTI:n ekstravertti kuvaa suuntautumista ulkoiseen asioiden ja ihmisten maailmaan ottamatta varsinaisesti kantaa sosiaalisuuteen.
ellauri109.html on line 726: I strove to speak: but horror tied my tongue;
ellauri118.html on line 639: Permits his force, yet gently strove ? Ole vievinäs väkisin, mie tuun mielelläin.
ellauri140.html on line 501: That hand or foot to stirre he strove in vaine: Nieze ei voinut jäsentänsä liikuttaa,
ellauri158.html on line 694: Hence also it follows, that everyone thought out for himself, according to his abilities, a different way of worshipping God, so that God might love him more than his fellows, and direct the whole course of nature for the satisfaction of his blind cupidity and insatiable avarice. Thus the prejudice developed into superstition, and took deep root in the human mind; and for this reason everyone strove most zealously to understand and explain the final causes of things; but in their endeavor to show that nature does nothing in vain, i.e. nothing which is useless to man, they only seem to have demonstrated that nature, the gods, and men are all mad together. Consider, I pray you, the result: among the many helps of nature they were bound to find some hindrances, such as storms, earthquakes, diseases, &c.: so they declared that such things happen, because the gods are angry at some wrong done to them by men, or at some fault committed in their worship. Experience day by day protested and showed by infinite examples, that good and evil fortunes fall to the lot of pious and impious alike; still they would not abandon their inveterate prejudice, for it was more easy for them to class such contradictions among other unknown things of whose use they were ignorant, and thus to retain their actual and innate condition of ignorance, than to destroy the whole fabric of their reasoning and start afresh. They therefore laid down as an axiom, that God´s judgments far transcend human understanding. Such a doctrine might well have sufficed to conceal the truth from the human race for all eternity, if mathematics had not furnished another standard of verity in considering solely the essence and properties of figures without regard to their final causes. There are other reasons (which I need not mention here) besides mathematics, which might have caused men´s minds to be directed to these general prejudices, and have led them to the knowledge of the truth.
ellauri164.html on line 892: To begin with, we need to know that there were two instances where the children of Israel on their journey to Canaan drank water from the rock. The first was at a place known as Rephidim which would later be called Massah (temptation) and Meribah (strife). The second was at Kadesh. The water here was also called water of Meribah. “This is the water of Meribah; because the children of Israel strove with the LORD, and He was sanctified in them.” Numbers 20:13
ellauri184.html on line 642: By deriving his superior authority directly from God (e.g., in exorcisms and forgiveness of sins: Lk. 7.47-50) through his unique proximity to God and his ultimate claim to his unique interpretation of divine law – he exclusively set his own standards and his own criteria of who had access to Heaven and who did not – he upset the masses and caught the attention of the authorities, who perceived such utterances as subversive. More and more, they felt threatened in their own authority. In addition to behaving as though bestowed with superior authority, Jesus sharply criticized the Temple to the point that he finally became violent within its precincts. After a final incident, the representatives of the Temple, the priests, the scribes, and the Elders, who strove to preserve the core of the Jewish faith as embodied in the Temple, felt threatened in their position.
ellauri302.html on line 64: Yet the essentially (though not conventionally) moral earnestness of both Shaw and Ash brings the circles of their themes in a sense tangent to each other. neither falls prey to that sentimentalization of the prostitute which Dumas helped so much to effect and which Augier strove to combat, nor the delusion of the conservative, conventional horror before an institution for the perpetuation of which conservatism and conventionalism are much to blame. Its all just business as usual. Pecunia non olet.
xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1055: The Polish szlachta and... intelligentsia were social strata in which reputation... was felt... very important... for a feeling of self-worth. Men strove... to find confirmation of their... self-regard... in the eyes of others... Such a psychological heritage forms both a spur to ambition and a source of constant stress, especially if [one has been inculcated with] the idea of [one]'s public duty...
xxx/ellauri293.html on line 569: Paljon rakastettu apina on persoona, joka rakastaa ihmisiä. He rakastavat nauramista, he rakastavat kertoa tarinoita ja ovat hyvin sanallisia. Tämä persoonallisuus on yleensä ekstrovertti ja viihtyy ryhmissä. He rakastavat sosiaalisia tilanteita ja pitävät yhteyttä muihin. Apinoilla on upea taito todella välittää ja ymmärtää ihmisiä. Heillä on luonnollinen kyky lukea muiden tunteita tarkasti. Ne ovat luonnollisia liittimiä ja voivat siten olla voimakkaita vaikuttajia. Apinat voivat kuitenkin käyttää tunteitaan hihoissaan. He ovat herkkiä olentoja ja niitä voidaan satuttaa tunteettomilla sanoilla tai käytöksellä. He voivat reagoida tunteella ajattelun sijaan. Ne viihtyvät hyvin oravanpyörässä, jos siellä pyörii muita oravia.
15