ellauri011.html on line 1336: The emergence of public opinion as a significant force in the political realm can be dated to the late 17th century. However, opinion had been regarded as having singular importance since far earlier. Medieval fama publica or vox et fama communis had great legal and social importance from the 12th and 13th centuries onward. Later, William Shakespeare called public opinion the "mistress of success" and Blaise Pascal thought it was "the queen of the world".
ellauri067.html on line 630: Tiiliskiven tuhannella sivulla Blicero/Weissman paljastuu yhen nuoren hererokoiraan rakastajaxi siirtomaistetussa Lounais-Afrikassa, ja sitten avainhahmoxi nazien raketin rakennusohjelmassa, minä aikana se kidutti jonkun teknikon suunnittelemaan räätälöidyn V2-raketin omiin tarkoituxiinsa. Lainaillen suosikkirunoilijaansa Rilkeä (ällökki), Weissman leikkaa yxiköllisen kuvion (cuts a singular figure). Hän kuvataan sekä "kaljuuntuvaxi koulumestarixi, joka kurkkii ylös pullonpohjalaseista" että "upiuudexi sotilaallisexi tyypixi, osaxi myyntimies, osaxi tiedemies". Se on brutaali: "sadisti jonka vastuulla on kekata uusia pelikuvioita kohti maximijulmuutta".
ellauri069.html on line 483: An article recently came out in the LA Times about Pynchon’s Great American Novel. The article begins by stating that Mason and Dixon is actually the most obvious candidate for the Great American Novel, and it instead suggests that Gravity’s Rainbow is perhaps the Great European Novel. The article then questions whether or not the Great American Novel even exists, and if it does if it is of a singular form or if it takes on many forms at once. After considering this question, the article finally claims that the Great American Novel is actually made up of all of Pynchon’s works fused together “into one epic Pynchoverse.” The Great American Novel certainly does not need to take place in America, but still many will argue that Gravity’s Rainbow by itself can never be considered as the Great American Novel because of its non-American setting and its wide array of characters. This is definitely debatable, but I do enjoy the idea of a “Pynchoverse” or a Pynchon Compilation being considered as the true Great American Novel. That being said, I do think most readers and Pynchonerds would undoubtedly say that Gravity's Rainbow is the Greatest Pynchon Novel.
ellauri070.html on line 338: The Qliphoth/Qlippoth/Qlifot or Kelipot (Hebrew: קְלִיפּוֹת, the different English spellings are used in the alternative Kabbalistic traditions of Hermetic Qabalah and Jewish Kabbalah respectively), literally "Peels", "Shells" or "Husks" (from singular: קְלִפָּה qlippah "Husk"), are the representation of evil or impure spiritual forces in Jewish mysticism, the polar opposites of the holy Sefirot. The realm of evil is also termed Sitra Achra/Aḥra (Aramaic סטרא אחרא, the "Other Side" opposite holiness) in Kabbalah texts.
ellauri079.html on line 122: A lot of fans will remember this awkward but funny family from TV and probably be able to sing the theme song without having to hear it. The Beverly Hillbillies were after all a favorite show back in their day and inspired a lot of other ideas that came much later, like David Foster Wallace´s magnum opus The Infinite Jest. The attempt to make a movie out of the show wasn’t all that successful and kind of left a bad taste in a lot of peoples’ mouths since it was such a poor attempt that even watching the trailer was something that people didn’t want to admit for a while. Sometimes the best thing you can do is remember the good times and think back to the original that made it something special. Lets hope they will never, never try to make a movie out of Infinite Jest. Jim Incandenza tried that once already, with singularly bad results.
ellauri080.html on line 524: Overall, SE/NI is much more trusting of what we could call empirical or collected data, particularly data from direct experience, which is why, as CelebrityTypes was the first to point out, it tends to feel much more “intense and singular” of vision, because it is perfectly happy with direct observation and direct conjecture from the collected data. As CelebrityTypes says, “The person will stress one point of view (Ni), which is indeed frequently the viewpoint that generates the greatest yield here and now (Se). The singularity of observation involved will frequently lend a manifest and immediate quality to the SE/NI type’s observations, which in turn tends to make them convincing.” This is because SE/NI is naturally hooked into and derived from a direct and photographic view of the world.
ellauri080.html on line 791: In the words of the Indian writer Khushwant Singh, "nine-tenths of the violence and unhappiness in this country derives from sexual repression". Gandhi isn't singularly to blame for India's deeply problematic attitudes to sex and female sexuality. But he fought, and succeeded, to ensure the country would never experience sexual freedom while his legend persevered. Gandhi's genius was to realise the great power of non-violent political revolution. But the violence of his thoughts towards women has contributed to countless honour killings and immeasurable suffering.
ellauri092.html on line 90: At first Moody could satisfy himself so that was ok. But the persistence of these ladies led him to meet and pray with them. They poured out their hearts asking Cod to fill them with His servant's Spirits. From that day a deep hunger and thirst gripped Moody. By October he was in agony for sole as he prayed and munched Cod for the promised gift. At times he would roll on the floor in agony with the ladies and in tears with this singular prayer to be baptised in the Holy Mackerel grilled with fire. This was a wrestle between his willy and Cod’s willy. It was that very month that Chicago burnt to the ground by ghost fire. All his works, efforts and organizational committees literally went up in a blaze. Shortly after this while passing through New York on his way to Britain the second time Cod heard his prayer. As he walked the streets his willy bent before Cod's, the power of the Golden Horde fell upon him, the Ford drew near and revealed Himself to be His servant. Moody rushed to a friend’s house and asked for rum and to be left alone. Hour after hour he bathed in the presence of Cod as the Holy Mackerels filled him. So strong was this that he cried out to Cod to stay in His hand lest He die. He was filled with the joy of the Gourd. When he left that house it was in the power of the fire, just like Chicago the other day.
ellauri093.html on line 664: Mutta nyt vakavampiin teemoihin. Yxi papinleski, joka nuorena oli kadottanut miehensä ja jäänyt orpojansa yxin huoltamaan kysyi: Mixi mixi? Virkamatkalla mieheni hevonen vauhkoontui ja heitti hänet rattailta. Mixi ei herra varjellut, jos hän on kaikkivoipa? Onko hän yxinkertaisesti ilkeä? Dolmen selitti kaiken hyvin päin: ajattele asiaa myös vähän meidän kannaltamme, siis miehen kannalta. Sehän pääsi pälkähästä tosi vähällä, saved by the gong. Mut mut jatkaa leski, jos tuonpuoleisessa on niin kivaa, mixei herra hyvä voinut ottaa meitä samaan hevoskyytiin? Mix se jätti meidät tänne kitumaan? No kaskun, Dick mietti, koska se haluu opettaa täällä meille jotakin. Hemmetti sanoo leski, se on ize tehnyt meidät, ja se on kaikkivoipa ja kaikkiviisas, miten se on voinut tunaroida näin? Mäkin olisin osannut tehdä paremman maailman, vaikkoon vain nainen. Tai hei, mix vaivautua ylipäänsä ollenkaan? Mixei se vaan jäänyt kellettelemään sinne singulariteettiin askartelemaan sitä kiveä mitä se ei jaxa heittää. Koko homma tuntuu aika joutavalta. Noh, kaskun, sanoo Dick ja sitten pruit pruit, läiskis läiskis, se päästää savusumun ja uikkii hiljaa Hiljan kansssa ruikkimaan. Tutkimattomat ovat herran tiehyet.
ellauri095.html on line 196: Inkscape, for Hopkins, is the charged essence, the absolute singularity that gives each created thing its being; instress is both the energy that holds the inscape together and the process by which this inscape is perceived by an observer. We instress the inscape of a tulip, Hopkins would say, when we appreciate the particular delicacy of its petals, when we are enraptured by its specific, inimitable shade of pink.
ellauri095.html on line 198: The meaning of “inscape,” that conundrum of Hopkins’s readers. A common misconception of the word is that it signifies simply a unique particular, the unusual feature, the singular appearance.
ellauri096.html on line 529: Galgalim (galgallim "spheres", "wheels", "whirlwinds" גַּלְגַּלִּים; singular: galgal, גַּלְגַּל), also called ophanim (Hebrew "wheels" ōphannīm אוֹפַנִּים; singular: ōphān, ofan אוֹפָן), refer to the wheels seen in Ezekiel's vision of the chariot (Hebrew merkabah) in Ezekiel 1:15–21. One of the Dead Sea scrolls (4Q405) construes them as angels; late sections of the Book of Enoch (61:10, 71:7) portray them as a class of celestial beings who (along with the Cherubim and Seraphim) never sleep, but guard the throne of God.
ellauri108.html on line 92: Rastas are monotheists, worshipping a singular God whom they call Jah. The term "Jah" is a shortened version of "Jehovah", the name of God in English translations of the Old Testament. Rastafari holds strongly to the immanence of this divinity; as well as regarding Jah as a deity, Rastas believe that Jah is inherent within each individual. This belief is reflected in the aphorism, often cited by Rastas, that "God is man and man is God", and Rastas speak of "knowing" Jah, in the biblical sense, rather than simply "believing" in him. In seeking to narrow the distance between humanity and divinity, Rastafari embraces mysticism.
ellauri109.html on line 511: Many literary figures have dreaded the spectre of the biographer. Charles Dickens, Wilkie Collins, Walt Whitman, Henry James, and Sylvia Plath are but a few who put their letters and journals into the fire. Lea poltti päiväkirjansa kommunistien pelossa ja repi lottapuvun matonkuteixi. James admitted to his nephew and literary executor that his singular desire in old age was to “frustrate as utterly as possible the postmortem exploiter.”
ellauri119.html on line 326: In all branches of Judaism, the God of the Hebrew Bible is considered one singular entity, with no divisions, or multi-persons within, and they reject the idea of a co-equal multi-personal Godhead or "Trinity", as actually against the Shema. They do not consider the Hebrew word for "one" (that is "echad") as meaning anything other than a simple numerical one.
ellauri133.html on line 422: The singular female character is placed in sexual situations many times throughout the novel. Her male counterparts are not unless it is specifically with her.
ellauri144.html on line 267: When employed in the United States, the verses sung tend to remain concise - sticking to the verse about being an honest man :D. The line "My verses flow green and red" references the reds and blood on the land, i.e. is an allusion to revolution, though it's almost never used to incite antifa violence in the US. The final verse speaks about casting one's lot with the poor, which is a singularly bad and un-American idea.
ellauri158.html on line 283: P. 1. prop. 28. Quodcumque singulare, sive quaevis res quae finita est et determinatam habet existentiam, non potest existere nec ad operandum determinari, nisi ad existendum et operandum determinetur ab alia causa, quae etiam finita est et determinatam habet existentiam; et rursus haec causa non potest etiam existere neque ad operandum determinari, nisi ab alia, quae etiam finita est et determinatam habet existentiam, determinetur ad existendum et operandum, et sic in infinitum. [in: P. 1. prop. 32., P. 2. prop. 9., lem. 3., prop. 30., prop. 31., prop. 48., P. 4. prop. 29., P. 5. prop. 6.]
ellauri158.html on line 354: P. 2. defin. 7. Per res singulares intelligo res, quae finitae sunt et determinatam habent existentiam. Quod si plura individua in una actione ita concurrant, ut omnia simul unius effectus sint causa, eadem omnia eatenus ut unam rem singularem considero.
ellauri158.html on line 374: P. 2. axiom. 5. Nullas res singulares praeter corpora et cogitandi modos sentimus, nec percipimus. [in: P. 2. prop. 13.]
ellauri158.html on line 406: P. 2. prop. 5. Esse formale idearum Deum, quatenus tantum ut res cogitans consideratur, pro causa agnoscit et non, quatenus alio attributo explicatur; hoc est, tam Dei attributorum, quam rerum singularium ideae non ipsa ideata sive res perceptas pro causa efficiente agnoscunt, sed ipsum Deum, quatenus est res cogitans.
ellauri158.html on line 432: P. 2. prop. 8. Ideae rerum singularium sive modorum non existentium ita debent comprehendi in Dei infinita idea, ac rerum singularium sive modorum essentiae formales in Dei attributis continentur. [in: prop. 45., P. 3. prop. 11. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 433: -- P. 2. prop. 8. coroll. Hinc sequitur, quod, quamdiu res singulares non existunt, nisi quatenus in Dei attributis comprehenduntur, earum esse obiectivum sive ideae non existunt, nisi quatenus infinita Dei idea existit; et ubi res singulares dicuntur existere, non tantum quatenus in Dei attributis comprehenduntur, sed quatenus etiam durare dicuntur, earum ideae etiam existentiam, per quam durare dicuntur, involvent. [in: P. 2. prop. 9., prop. 11., prop. 15., prop. 45., P. 3. prop. 11. schol., P. 5. prop. 21., prop. 23.]
ellauri158.html on line 438: P. 2. prop. 9. Idea rei singularis actu existentis Deum pro causa habet, non quatenus infinitus est, sed quatenus alia rei singularis actu existentis idea affectus consideratur, cuius etiam Deus est causa, quatenus alia tertia affectus est, et sic in infinitum. [in: P. 2. prop. 9. coroll., prop. 19., prop. 20., prop. 24., prop. 25., P. 3. prop. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 439: -- P. 2. prop. 9. coroll. Quicquid in singulari cuiuscumque ideae obiecto contingit, eius datur in Deo cognitio, quatenus tantum eiusdem obiecti ideam habet. [in: P. 2. prop. 12., prop. 13., prop. 30., P. 3. prop. 10.]
ellauri158.html on line 450: P. 2. prop. 11. Primum, quod actuale mentis humanae esse constituit, nihil aliud est, quam idea rei alicuius singularis actu existentis. [in: P. 2. prop. 12., prop. 13., prop. 20., prop. 48., P. 3. prop. 2., prop. 3., prop. 10., gener. aff. defin., P. 4. prop. 37., P. 5. prop. 9., prop. 38.]
ellauri158.html on line 660: P. 2. prop. 31. Nos de duratione rerum singularium, quae extra nos sunt, nullam nisi admodum inadaequatam cognitionem habere possumus. [in: P. 2. prop. 31. coroll., P. 4. prop. 62. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 705: P. 2. prop. 37. Id quod omnibus commune quodque aeque in parte ac in toto est, nullius rei singularis essentiam constituit. [in: P. 2. prop. 44. coroll. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 733: P. 2. prop. 45. Unaquaeque cuiuscumque corporis, vel rei singularis actu existentis idea Dei aeternam et infinitam essentiam necessario involvit. [in: P. 2. prop. 46., prop. 47., P. 5. prop. 20. schol., prop. 29. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 862: P. 3. prop. 52. Obiectum quod simul cum aliis antea vidimus, vel quod nihil habere imaginamur, nisi quod commune est pluribus, non tamdiu contemplabimur, ac illud, quod aliquid singulare habere imaginamur. [in: P. 3. prop. 55. coroll. 2. schol., aff. defin. 4., aff. defin. 10.]
ellauri158.html on line 935: P. 3. aff. defin. 4. Admiratio est rei alicuius imaginatio, in qua mens defixa propterea manet, quia haec singularis imaginatio nullam cum reliquis habet connexionem. [in: P. 4. prop. 59.]
ellauri158.html on line 988: P. 4. defin. 3. Res singulares voco contingentes, quatenus, dum ad earum solam essentiam attendimus, nihil invenimus, quod earum existentiam necessario ponat, vel quod ipsam necessario secludat. [in: P. 4. prop. 12., prop. 13.]
ellauri158.html on line 989: P. 4. defin. 4. Easdem res singulares voco possibiles, quatenus, dum ad causas, ex quibus produci debent, attendimus, nescimus, an ipsae determinatae sint ad easdem producendum. [in: P. 4. prop. 12.]
ellauri158.html on line 995: P. 4. axiom. Nulla res singularis in rerum natura datur, qua potentior et fortior non detur alia. Sed quacumque data datur alia potentior, a qua illa data potest destrui. [in: P. 4. prop. 3., prop. 7., P. 5. prop. 37. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 1038: P. 4. prop. 29. Res quaecumque singularis, cuius natura a nostra prorsus est diversa, nostram agendi potentiam nec iuvare nec coercere potest, et absolute res nulla potest nobis bona aut mala esse, nisi commune aliquid nobiscum habeat. [in: P. 4. prop. 31. coroll.]
ellauri158.html on line 1048: -- P. 4. prop. 35. coroll. 1. Nihil singulare in rerum natura datur, quod homini sit utilius, quam homo qui ex ductu rationis vivit. [in: P. 4. prop. 35. coroll. 2., prop. 37., prop. 37. schol. 2., prop. 71.]
ellauri158.html on line 1162: P. 5. prop. 7. Affectus, qui ex ratione oriuntur vel excitantur, si ratio temporis habeatur, potentiores sunt iis, qui ad res singulares referuntur, quas ut absentes contemplamur. [in: P. 5. prop. 10. schol., prop. 20. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 1189: P. 5. prop. 24. Quo magis res singulares intelligimus, eo magis Deum intelligimus. [in: P. 5. prop. 25., prop. 27.]
ellauri164.html on line 552: Two lessons: 1. The failings of good men may be culpable in God's sight and displeasing to him out of all proportion to the degree of blameworthiness they present to our eye. So far is it from being true (as many seem to think) that believers' sins are no sins at all, and need give no concern, that, on the contrary, the Lord dislikes the stain of sin most when it is seen in his dear children. The case of Moses is not singular. Sins which the Lord overlooks in other men he will occasionally put some mark of special displeasure upon, when they are committed by one who is eminent for holiness and honourable service. It is, no doubt, a just instinct which leads all right-thinking people to be blind to the failings of good men who have been signally useful in their day. But if the good men become indulgent to their own faults they are likely to be rudely awakened to a sense of their error. The better a man is, his sins may be the more dishonouring to God. A spot hardly visible on the coat of a labouring man, may be glaringly offensive on the shining raiment of a throned king.
ellauri181.html on line 376: While mean scores from Likert-type scales can be compared across individuals, scores from an ipsative measure cannot. To explain, if an individual was equally extroverted and conscientious and was assessed on a Likert-type scale, each trait would be evaluated singularly, i.e. respondents would see the item "I enjoy parties" and agree or disagree with it to whatever degree reflected their preferences.[citation needed]
ellauri182.html on line 367: they acquire the endings -s in nominative singular and -ar in nominative
ellauri182.html on line 371: weak declension, i.e. they acquire the endings -a in genitive singular and -ar in
ellauri182.html on line 377: singular and -ur and a vowel mutation (umlaut) in nominative and accusative
ellauri182.html on line 378: plural (blókar— blœkur). Words ending in -ik, like grafik "graphic", lýrik "lyric", politik "politics", trafftk "traffic" get the ending -ur in genitive singular, but no plural, and words with the suffix -sjón, as e.g. aksjón "action", have the endings -ar in genitive singular and -ir in nominative and accusative plural (aksjónar—aksjónir). As -sjón is not accepted as an Icelandic suffix, aksjón counts as a foreign word, but not as a loanword. [Silly bitch, it is a Danish loan put to new use.]
ellauri182.html on line 381: ending -u in genitive singular and -ur in nominative and accusative plural
ellauri191.html on line 510: "for his work which is marked by both idealism and humanity, its stimulating satire often being infused with a singular poetic beauty"
ellauri191.html on line 2147: Strindberg holds the singular distinction of being awarded an Anti-Nobel Prize, conferred by popular acclaim and national subscription and presented to him in 1912 by future prime minister Hjalmar Branting.
ellauri219.html on line 674: ”Yksinkertaisessa ymmärryksessäni olen havainnut neljä kristillisen elämän astetta tai muotoa, jotka ovat nämä: tavallinen, erityinen, yksiköllinen (singular), ja täydellinen. Kolme näistä saatetaan aloittaa ja lopettaa tässä elämässä. Neljäs voidaan Jumalan armon avulla aloittaa täällä, mutta se jatkuu iankaikkisesti taivaan ilossa”.
ellauri220.html on line 367: (South Africa, Zimbabwe, & Zambia) a term, used among white people, for a black person. The term derives from muntu, the singular of Bantu.
ellauri247.html on line 279: Despite the doctor's unflattering portraits of Frenchmen, M. Babeau admits that his book is one written by an observer of facts, and a man whose statements, whenever they can be tested, are for the most part "singularly exact."
ellauri249.html on line 478: The Dunning–Kruger effect is defined as the tendency of people with low ability in a specific area to give overly positive assessments of this ability. The name comes from two singularly dense American psychologists Dunning and Kruger who thought they were the cat's whiskers, though in fact they could not find their own arses with a map.
ellauri301.html on line 230: Khoekhoen (singular Khoekhoe) (or Khoikhoi in the former orthography; formerly also Hottentots) are the traditionally nomadic pastoralist indigenous population of southwestern Africa. They are often grouped with the hunter-gatherer San (literally "Foragers") peoples. The designation "Khoekhoe" is actually a kare or praise address, not an ethnic endonym, but it has been used in the literature as an ethnic term for Khoe-speaking peoples of Southern Africa, particularly pastoralist groups, such as the !Ora, !Gona, Nama, Xiri and ǂNūkhoe nations. Noi huutomerkit ym ovat naxautusäänteitä, joita meille opetti svartskalle kielitieteen assari, musta Lumikki. Nyt sekin saattaa olla vitskalle pikemminkin.
ellauri321.html on line 114: Crèvecoeur's book differs from other works descriptive of early conditions in America in that xvi that it should be regarded primarily as a piece of literature. Beyond the information that is given by it there is the more permanent significance of its tone and atmosphere, of its singularly engaging style, and of the fact that it forms part of a great literary movement.
ellauri321.html on line 137: Whenever I go abroad it is always involuntary. I never return home without feeling some pleasing emotion, which I often suppress as useless and foolish. The instant I enter on my own land, the bright idea of property, of exclusive right, of independence exalt my mind. Precious soil, I say to myself, by what singular custom of law is it that thou wast made to constitute the riches of the freeholder? What should we American farmers be without the distinct possession of that soil? It feeds, it clothes us, from it we draw even a great exuberancy, our best meat, our richest drink, the very honey of our bees comes from this privileged spot. No wonder we should thus cherish its possession, no wonder that so many Europeans who have never been able to say that such portion of land was theirs, cross the Atlantic to realize that happiness. this is what may be called the true and the only philosophy of an American farmer. He is like a cock perhaps, arrayed with the most majestic plumes, tender to its mate, bold, courageous, endowed with an astonishing instinct to fuck, with thoughts, with memory, and every distinguishing characteristic of the reason of man. I really enjoy killing all my animals, like doves, my record is fourteen dozen.
ellauri375.html on line 147: Third Person Masculine(sing., plur.): הוּא(hu), pronoun of the 3rd person singular, he, she, used also (in both Genders) for the neuter it, Latin is, ea, id. Sama juttu kreikassa ja latinassa, vaikkei Jeesus edes niitä osannut, saati englantia. Suomeenkin erottelu lainattiin ruåzista.
ellauri377.html on line 332: Strong's 1510: I am, exist. The first person singular present indicative; a prolonged form of a primary and defective verb; I exist.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 650: We’re big fans of Germany mostly because of its language and the many awesome singular (or plural) words that describe something more complex. Everyone knows schadenfreude and wanderlust, but how about wurmgesicht und endlösung? The German language is the best language, basically.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 638: The Aramaic word form šəḇaqtanī is based on the verb šəḇaq/šāḇaq, 'to allow, to permit, to forgive, and to forsake', with the perfect tense ending -t (2nd person singular: 'you'), and the object suffix -anī (1st person singular: 'me').
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 201: Still, the fact that they bring up Hemingway’s Catholicism at all confirmed my own suspicions of a deeper, clear-eyed spiritual sensibility lurking behind all of Hemingway’s naturalistic plots — forcing me to reconsider everything I had previously thought about the man. I see Catholicism as playing a central role in Hemingway’s literary vision and moral landscape. Non-catholics just turn away from the religious clues in his work to focus on his public image, war exploits, and psychological instability — all the while missing that singularly under-reported and significant aspect of Hemingway’s life as a writer: his Catholicism.
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 163: They say that I am singular,
xxx/ellauri356.html on line 628: Luovun enemmistä Hölderlinin lainauksista vaikka sormet syyhyisivät, mutta hänen tekstiensä moniäänisyys seuraa minua aina. Ja sanon, että runoilijan Miksi (2 P:tä isoilla kirjaimilla) on kahden vuosisadan ajan väistynyt kirjoittamisen Miten (yleisessä merkityksessä, jonka nykyaika antaa sen kaikissa taiteissa): veneitä juovuksissa, aistien häiriintyminen, merkityksen ja järjettömyyden valaiseminen. Runollinen kirjoittaminen ei anna meille mitään perustaa, se vain herättää meidät rakentamaan uudelleen perustan, mukaan lukien valistuksen ja ihmisoikeuksien perusta. Se paljastaa meille sisäisten kokemusten multiversumeita (kuten kosmologit sanovat), joita se uudistaa loputtomasti. Joten, ihmisoikeuksien tehokkuus, joka johtaa singulariteettien kukoistukseen ja uskontojen yhteentörmäyksen lisäksi, olisiko runollinen kirjoittaminen jaettavien singulaariteettien kieli? Se on vetoni. On siis meidän tehtävämme ymmärtää paremmin runouden psykososiaalista dynamiikkaa ja ennen kaikkea rohkaista sen leviämistä modernin, erityisesti digitaalisen, tarjoamissa monissa muodoissa. Siitä tulee rohkea ja pitkäaikainen sitoumus. Mutta jos emme pysty siihen, transhumanismi on vain työkalu ihmislajin trivialisointiin ja automatisointiin.
61 |