ellauri002.html on line 1968: April is the cruellest month, breeding

ellauri004.html on line 787: Membra quondam dicebant ventri, “Nosne te semper ministerio nostro alemus, dum tu summo otio frueris? Hoc non diutius faciemus.” Dum igitur ventri cibum subducunt, corpus debilitatum est, et membra sero invidiae suae paenituit.
ellauri005.html on line 1785: med den fruen åter.

ellauri006.html on line 1483: To think of the biblical unicorn as a fantasy animal is to demean God’s Word, which is true in every detail.
ellauri006.html on line 1675: Life's a laugh and death's a joke, it's true.

ellauri007.html on line 1327: their true menage of thirty years

ellauri011.html on line 546: "when you really want something to happen, the whole universe will conspire so that your wish comes true"

ellauri014.html on line 213: Diderot later described Rousseau as being "false, vain as Satan, ungrateful, cruel, hypocritical, and wicked... He sucked ideas from me, used them himself, and then affected to despise me".
ellauri014.html on line 1040: Alors il me remit la lettre. Elle était de Laure. Je ne l’ouvris pas sans émotion. « L’amour a vaincu, me disait-elle ; vous avez voulu m’épouser ; je suis contente. Votre ami m’a dicté mon devoir ; je le remplis sans regret. En vous déshonorant, j’aurais vécu malheureuse ; en vous laissant votre gloire, je crois la partager. Le sacrifice de tout mon bonheur à un devoir si cruel me fait oublier la honte de ma jeunesse. Adieu, dès cet instant je cesse d’être en votre pouvoir et au mien. Adieu pour jamais. O Edouard ! ne portez pas le désespoir dans ma retraite ; écoutez mon dernier vœu. Ne donnez à nulle autre une place que je n’ai pu remplir. Il fut au monde un cœur fait pour vous, et c’était celui de Laure. »
ellauri014.html on line 1399: And if you want to prove it´s true

ellauri014.html on line 1557: ... But more importantly, these surroundings put Marino in direct contact with the natural philosophy of Della Porta and the philosophical systems of Giordano Bruno and Tommaso Campanella. While Campanella himself was to oppose "Marinism" (though not attacking it directly), this common speculative background should be borne in mind with its important pantheistic (and thus neo-pagan and heterodox) implications, to which Marino would remain true all his life and exploit in his poetry, obtaining great success amongst some of the most conformist thinkers on the one hand while encountering continual difficulties because of the intellectual content of his work on the other.
ellauri014.html on line 1687: Of true and honoured fame saavuttaisin julkkiksen mä aseman.
ellauri014.html on line 1765: Of true and honoured fame saavuttaisin julkkiksen mä aseman.
ellauri017.html on line 699: Oisko hobitti tai ehkä Druedain, nekin oli köyryselkäisiä pikkumiehiä.
ellauri017.html on line 1127: Agustin ja Hugo oli herttaisen samaa mieltä kuolemanrangaistus on paikallaan vaikkapa Fernando Alcazarille. Ei siihen riitä Alcazarin vankila, ei Guantanamokaan, jos bylsii Hugon vaimoa, ja sit vielä pelastaa Hugon hengen nolosti taistelussa mut jättää sen keskijalan kentälle. Cruel and unusual punishment. Onko ihme et se on kiivas ja pitkävihainen. Ei armoa!
ellauri018.html on line 623: Hömelö kenialainen juippi Suleiman Adan selittää juutuubissa paxulla nekruenglannilla, mix tytöt tykkää saippuasta (eikä futixesta kuten pojat):
ellauri020.html on line 364: Palm Beach had been Ivana Trump’s idea. Long ago, Donald had screamed at her, “I want nothing social that you aspire to. If that is what makes you happy, get another husband!” But she had no intention of doing that, for Ivana, like Donald, was living out a fantasy. She had seen that in the Trump life everything and everybody appeared to come with a price, or a marker for future use. Ivana had learned to look through Donald with glazed eyes when he said to close friends, as he had in the early years of their marriage, “I would never buy Ivana any decent jewels or pictures. Why give her negotiable assets?” She had gotten out of Eastern Europe by being tough and highly disciplined, and she had compounded her skills through her husband, the master manipulator. She had learned the lingua franca in a world where everyone seemed to be using everyone else in a relentless drive for power. How was she to know that there was another way to live? Besides, she often told her friends, however cruel Donald could be, she was very much in love with him.
ellauri021.html on line 684: Nunquam braver, nunquam truer,
ellauri021.html on line 741: Cruel possum! bestia vilest,
ellauri021.html on line 885: According to The Australian, although the site´s operators claim that the site "strives to keep its articles concise, informative, family-friendly, and true to the facts, which often back up conservative ideas more than liberal ones", on Conservapedia "arguments are often circular" and "contradictions, self-serving rationalizations and hypocrisies abound."
ellauri022.html on line 708: "It can hardly be true that the difference lies in the attribute of reason. I saw ten, twenty, a hundred large lipped, lowbrowed black men in the streets who, except in the mere matter of language, did not exceed the sagacity of the elephant. Now is it true that these were created superior to this wise animal, and designed to control it? And in comparison with the highest orders of men, the Africans will stand so low as to make the difference which subsists between themselves & the sagacious beasts inconsiderable."
ellauri023.html on line 638: Aarne on vähän epämuodikkaasti wittgensteinilainen, vaikkei true believer, silti paasaa kielestä. Wittgenstein oli rahamiesten sukua, pikkuisen vanhoillinen izekin mutta persuvastainen. Jumalaton jutku, katolinen äiti, kaappihomo. Idealismin pikku käsityöläinen.
ellauri024.html on line 509: Arvovapaata ei naurata, niinkuin ei arvojensa vankiakaan. Kun on liikaa arvoja tai ei ollenkaan, ei tarvi suuttua eikä nauraa. Nauru kuuluu sinne välille, kun on arvoristiriitoja, inkongruensseja. Arvojen ja niiden suhteellisuuden tajua.
ellauri026.html on line 227: This is a famous line, but here it would hardly seem to merit its fame—who cares about people “arguing about how tough they are”? The word here translated as “tough” just happens to be one of the central words of Hellenic thought: arete, “virtue” or “excellence,” that subject of so many subsequent philosophy lectures—whose learnability or unlearnability Plato made the subject of inquiry, and which Aristotle defined as a mean between two vices. The word can be used to mean something like “bravery,” but it is wildly broader and richer than “how tough one is” (there is a queen named Arete in the poem, but Wilson refrains from translating her as “Queen Tough”). The line was quoted over and over again in later days because it was considered the height of happiness for a man to have a son and grandson competing with each other to possess virtue or true excellence. This Wilson suppresses, as a thing irrelevant to contemporary idiom—“toughness” will have to serve in its place.
ellauri026.html on line 516:

ellauri028.html on line 184: This was Twain's most serious, philosophical and private book. He kept it locked in his desk, considered it to be his Bible, and spoke of it as such to friends when he read them passages. He had written it, rewritten it, was finally satisfied with it, but still chose not to release it until after his death. It appears in the form of a dialogue between an old man and a young man who discuss who and what mankind really is and provides a new and different way of looking at who we are and the way we live. Anyone who thinks Twain was not a brilliant philosopher should read this book. We consider ourselves as free and autonomous people, yet this book puts forth the ideas that 1) We are nothing more than machines and originate nothing - not even a single thought; 2) All conduct arises from one motive - self-satisfaction; 3) Our temperament is completely permanent and unchangeable; and 4) Man is of course a product of heredity, and our future, being fixed, is irrevocable -- which makes life completely predetermined. If these points are true, then buying and reading this book is not in your control, but simply must be done because it was meant to be. If these points are not true you might still wish to make an independent decision to enjoy a thought-provoking book by a great and legendary writer.
ellauri029.html on line 916: The Corinthians would not have considered Paul’s language intentionally cruel. Instead, they would have recognized Paul was using rhetoric to make a point. The Corinthians felt superior to Paul, casting judgment on him. So he calls them spiritual kings and says, ironically, that God considers His apostles “scum” and “dregs.”
ellauri029.html on line 926: We should speak the truth with loving intent (Ephesians 4:15), avoiding “foolish talk or coarse joking” (Ephesians 5:4). We should speak in such a way that the hearer will understand our motivation. And we should never be malicious or cruel. Carefully worded irony may be fitting, but malicious sarcasm is not.
ellauri030.html on line 889: Mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true” (1925b, 75).
ellauri032.html on line 32: That which perhaps may most offend, are certain Texts of Holy Scripture, alledged by me to other purpose than ordinarily they use to be by others. You may be pleased to excuse your selfe, and say that I am a man that love my own opinions, and think all true I say.
ellauri032.html on line 293: Piispa John Bramhall, vannoutunut arminianismin kannattaja (ks yllä), julkaisi pienen tutkielman Of Liberty and Necessity joka oli osoitettu Hobbesille. Bramhall oli tavannut Hobbesin aiemmin ja väitellyt tämän kanssa, ja kirjoitti jälkeenpäin näkemyksensä Hobbesin vastattavaksi. Hobbes vastasi, mutta ei julkaistavaksi. Eräs ranskalainen tuttava kuitenkin julkaisi vastauksen. Bramhall julkaisi vuonna 1655 vastaiskuna kaiken kirjeenvaihdon heidän välillään nimellä A Defence of the True Liberty of Human Actions from Antecedent or Extrinsic Necessity. Vuonna 1656 Hobbesilla oli puolestaan valmiina teos Questions concerning Liberty, Necessity and Chance, jolla hän vastasi piispalle voimallisesti. Hobbesin vastaukset olivat merkittäviä vapaan tahdon ongelman historiassa mahdollisesti ensimmäisinä selkeän psykologisen determinismin esityksinä. Piispa vastasi syytöksiin vuonna 1658 teoksella Castigations of Mr Hobbes´s Animadversions, johon oli liitetty laaja liite nimellä The Catching of Leviathan the Great Whale. Hobbes ei koskaan vastannut tähän teokseen.
ellauri033.html on line 122: jeunes poètes qui, lassés dp la rhétorique sonore et crue, de la
ellauri033.html on line 424: Jos se käyttäis tota erittelyä vaan monimutkaisiin tunteisiin, joita ehkä ei muuten tajua, mut ei se selittää laajasti tapauxia joissa ei ole mitään hämärää, tilanteisiin jotka ei kaipais mitään kommentaaria. Siitä vois antaa tukuittain esimerkkejä. Esim mitä kiinnostavaa on leikellä mustasukkaisen rakkauden anatomiaa kirjassa Cruelle enigme, missä se kertoo pitkällisesti mitä tapahtuu d´Hubertin mielessä kun Rva de Sauve pettää sitä. Hra Bourget tässä esiintyy taas yleisön pyynnöstä; se soittaa mielisoitinta. Se selittää ihan yxinkertaisia mielenliikkeitä niin pitkästi että alkaa luulla et niissä on jotain monimutkaista. Osan mielestä se on kuolleen konin ruoskintaa, osalle se vaan sotkee selvää asiaa. Ja jos tyypit ei ole tarpeex kiinnostavia leikeltäväxi, se kexii ihan kummia hyypiöitä, niin omituisia et ne ei edes kiinnosta, ihan vaan virtuositeettina. Se leikkelee jopa ihan sivuhenkilöitä, vaan leikkelemisen ilosta. ... TLDR
ellauri033.html on line 1108: Atteint d´un cancer des voies digestives lors de l´hiver 1888-1889, Villiers ne peut plus travailler, et Mallarmé doit ouvrir une « cotisation amicale » parmi ses amis pour subvenir à ses besoins et à ceux de sa famille. Le 12 juillet 1889, il est transféré à la clinique des Frères Saint-Jean-de-Dieu, rue Oudinot, à Paris. Se sentant à l´article de la mort, il rédige, le 12 août, un testament où il reconnaît son fils Victor et épouse in extremis Marie Dantine, le 14 août, afin de légitimer son fils. À noter que, juste avant de mourir, il aurait eu ces derniers mots passés à la postérité : « Eh bien, je m´en souviendrai de cette planète ! »
ellauri035.html on line 1150: Nada de indignación moral, cuyo sentimiento vindicativo me parece en el fondo una forma de crueldad. Gracián jamás se indigna, lo que noquiere decir precisamente que sea insensible.
ellauri037.html on line 265: True or not,
ellauri037.html on line 458:

Brueghelin 2 apinaa


ellauri040.html on line 327: The generation born completely within the technological age, war on terror, and multiculturalism. This generation is the first true global culture as their characteristics and trend is more uniform across the globe as they become the most open minded generation to date.
ellauri041.html on line 401: Se kiinnosti myös Hieronymus Boschia, Bruegheleitä, Max Ernstiä ja Salvador Dalia.

ellauri041.html on line 403: Paha Busch oli varmaan tihrustellut Boschin ja/tai Bruegheleiden Antoniuxen kiusauxia.

ellauri041.html on line 1832: April is the cruellest month, breeding

ellauri042.html on line 634: ... the important and the trivial, the true and the false, the serious and the joking, are poured out in a rapid, unselective, half-confabulatory stream...
ellauri042.html on line 657: An anecdote in "A Letter from Mr. Cibber, to Mr. Pope", published in 1742, recounts their trip to a brothel organised by Pope's own patron, who apparently intended to stage a cruel joke at the expense of the poet. Since Pope was only about 4' tall, with a hunchback, due to a childhood tubercular infection of the spine, and the prostitute specially chosen as Pope's 'treat' was the fattest and largest on the premises, the tone of the event is fairly self-apparent. Cibber describes his 'heroic' role in snatching Pope off of the prostitute's body, where he was precariously perched like a tom-tit, while Pope's patron looked on, sniggering, thereby saving English poetry. While Cibber's elevation to laureateship in 1730 had further inflamed Pope against him, there is little speculation involved in suggesting that Cibber's anecdote, with particular reference to Pope´s "little-tiny manhood", motivated the revision of hero.
ellauri042.html on line 701: In 1833, the family moved to Tula where the father bought a manor. Shortly after the death of his mother in 1837, Fyodor (16 yrs) was sent to St. Petersburg where he entered the Army Engineering College. 2 years later, in 1839, Dostoevsky´s more and more tyrannical father died, probably of apoplexy, but there were strong rumours that he was murdered by his own serfs in a quarrel. (Unless it was Fedja who dunit.) Against the background of this legend, Sigmund Freud later interpreted the patricide in the novel “The brothers Karamazov” as showing Fedja hated his father´s guts. True, but the main thing was the epilepsy, wait and see.
ellauri042.html on line 943: Donne's style is characterised by abrupt openings and various paradoxes, ironies and dislocations. These features, along with his frequent dramatic or everyday speech rhythms, his tense syntax and his tough eloquence, were both a reaction against the smoothness of conventional Elizabethan poetry and an adaptation into English of European baroque and mannerist techniques. His early career was marked by poetry that bore immense knowledge of English society. Another important theme in Donne´s poetry is the idea of true religion, something that he spent much time considering and about which he often theorised. He wrote secular poems as well as erotic and love poems. He is particularly famous for his mastery of metaphysical conceits.
ellauri043.html on line 18:

Bosch / Brueghel / Flaubert


ellauri043.html on line 86: Multa menee usein sekaisin Bosch ja Brueghel, eikä ihme. Pieter Brueghel vanhempi oli Boschia (1450-1516) nuorempi (syntyi 10v Boschin kuoltua, 1525-1569), ja matki sitä ihan sikana. Tässä kansikuvana komeilee Boschin piirtämä suht kesy St Anthonius, kun Flaubertiin teki vaikutuxen Brueghel vanhemman (oikeesti ehkä jonkun sen kolleegan) coveri, joka on alla vas. Brueghel nuorempi (1564-11638) oli Brueghel vanhemman poika ja syntyi 5v ennen sen kuolemaa. Nuorempi kopsi vanhemman töitä ihan sikana. Tuonnoin siinä ei ollut mitään pahaa, perheyritys. Brueghel nuoremman kiusaus on alla oik. Ei taida olla kopio, ellei tosi huono. Kolmas kuva äärimmäisenä oik. on mun Boschin porakone. Puuttuu vielä Lean kinkkukiusaus.
ellauri043.html on line 89: rueghel-sr.jpg" height="240px" />
ellauri043.html on line 90: rueghel-jr.jpg" height="240px" />
ellauri043.html on line 92:
Brueghel vanhemman (?) ja nuoremman kiusauxet ja Bosch.

ellauri043.html on line 872:

Misu tekee piruetin.
ellauri043.html on line 5550: Ateenalainen tervehti mua kuin onnen airuena, harras roomalainen kirosi mua nyrkki pystyssä, ja Egyptin paavi pidättäytyi pavuista, koska se vapisi mun ääntä ja kalpeni mun hajusta.
ellauri043.html on line 6728: Ja kaivautuen vähitellen se katoo hiekkaan, sillä aikaa kuin Kimara, joka roikuttaa kieltä ulkona, etääntyy tehden piruetteja.
ellauri043.html on line 6972: Tulee hävittäjiä (tai tuulenpuuskia), täynnä merkillisiä ruumiinrakenteita. Siinä on alligaattorin päitä kauriin jaloilla, huuhkajia käärmeenpurstolla, tiikerinkuonoisia porsaita, aasinpyllyisiä vuohipukkeja, sammakoita karvaisia kuin karhut, virtahevon kokoisia kameleontteja, kaxipäisiä vasikoita joista päistä toinen itkee ja toinen ammuu, nelinkertaisia sikiöitä jotka on kiinni toisistaan navan kohdalta ja valssaavat kuin hyrrät, siivekkäitä mahalaukkuja jotka heittää häränpyllyä kuin mäkäräiset. Suoraan Brueghelilta.
ellauri048.html on line 1124: I hold it true, whate'er befall;

ellauri048.html on line 1232: O Sorrow, cruel fellowship, Oi suru, julma veljeskunta,
ellauri048.html on line 1597: And flashes into false and true,
ellauri048.html on line 1842: In more of life true life no more
ellauri048.html on line 1866: I hold it true, whate´er befall;
ellauri049.html on line 689: Un Ennui, désolé par les cruels espoirs, Ikävyys, julman toiveajattelun hylkäämä,
ellauri049.html on line 950: Zénon ! Cruel Zénon ! Zénon d’Élée ! Zenon! Zenonin julmetus! Elealainen!
ellauri050.html on line 211: Their traitorous trueness, and their loyal deceit. kavalasti uskollisia, lojaaleja petkuttajia.
ellauri051.html on line 1176: 583 To accrue what I hear into this song, to let sounds contribute toward it. 583 Keräämään kuulemani tähän lauluun, antamaan äänien vaikuttaa siihen.
ellauri051.html on line 1310: 710 Space and Time! now I see it is true, what I guess'd at, 710 Tila ja aika! nyt näen sen olevan totta, mitä luulin,
ellauri051.html on line 1503: 901 His was the surly English pluck, and there is no tougher or truer, and never was, and never will be; 901 Hänen oli äreä englantilainen kynä, eikä ole olemassa kovempaa tai todenmukaisempaa, eikä ole koskaan ollut eikä tule olemaankaan;
ellauri051.html on line 1812: 1200 The great Camerado, the lover true for whom I pine will be there. 1200 Suuri Camerado, todellinen rakastaja, jota rakastan.
ellauri051.html on line 1955: 1335 It flings my likeness after the rest and true as any on the shadow'd wilds, 1335 Se heittää kaltaiseni muun jälkeen ja on totta kuin mikä tahansa varjon erämaassa,
ellauri051.html on line 3246: Au tournant d’une rue brûlant Palavan kadun kulmassa
ellauri052.html on line 597: He was a man who convinced and hypnotized not only others but himself. He seemed to possess a number of characters which he changed like masks as the need arose, now he was a benevolent pastor … now a magician holding sway over human souls … His sole purpose and aspiration was to obtain possession of all things from below, by his own titanic devices, and to break through by a passionate effort to the realm of the spirit… He may have possessed oratorical gifts, but he lacked the true gift and feeling for words. His speech was a kind of magical act, aimed at obtaining control over his hearers by means of gestures, by raising and lowering his voice, and by changes in the expression of his face. He hypnotized his disciples, some of whom even fell asleep.
ellauri052.html on line 654: There were two Krishnamurtis. One was the persona presented to the world through lectures and books; a man without ego who led a sanctified life of celibacy and high moral purity. The other Krishnamurti was a shadowy, self-centered, vain man, capable of sudden angers and enormous cruelty to friends. He was also a habitual liar. Krishna, as his friends called him, freely admitted his compulsive lying. He blamed it on simple fear of having his deceptions detected.
ellauri052.html on line 939: Greg had made a career out of his own childhood misery—a nasty dig given that Saul was as much the author of that misery as he was of his novels. Greg noted, with shrugging disapproval, that his father “felt a duty of truth to his readers that was stronger than to his family,” but indicated he still didn’t understand or accept this about his father. Perhaps he can’t be expected to. “All significant human business is transacted inside,” was Saul’s lesson to Greg, who doesn’t seem to have forgiven his father for it being true.
ellauri052.html on line 970: The rap against Bellow is that he maligned four of his five wives, especially in his fiction. This is true, and Leader is savvy enough not to take Bellow’s word about them. Wife No. 1, Anita, is shown as the underappreciated mainstay she obviously was. As for wife No. 2, Sondra Tschacbasov Bellow (Bellow called her Sasha), the model for the evil Madeleine, Leader has a scoop: an unpublished memoir shared with him after Bellow’s death. By her own account, Sasha was a vulnerable child-woman lacking basic life skills. From childhood and into her teens, she says, she was the victim of incest committed by her father. When Bellow took up with her, he was 37 and she was 21, a Bennington graduate and a secretary at the Partisan Review. His friends treated her with a sniggering sexism unfortunately unremarkable in the 1950s. At a party Bellow took her to, the critic R. W. B. Lewis, her former professor, drunkenly demanded to
ellauri053.html on line 1157:

In 1997, his biographer R. F. Foster observed that Napoleon's dictum that to understand the man you have to know what was happening in the world when he was twenty "is manifestly true of W.B.Y."


ellauri053.html on line 1395: And loved your beauty with love false or true,
ellauri053.html on line 1430: This poem is very famous in China. We first know Yeats by this wonderful poem, which contain a story of Yeats himself that move us so deeply. From this poem, we know what is the true love, we know how deeply love can be. This has been transferred into the famous poem of MUDAN, also been transferred into a popular song sung by SHUIMUNIANHUA, so we can see how arractive it was to us in China.

ellauri053.html on line 1433: This poem still moves me immensely, thirty-four years after I first read it and carefully parted from my very first true love. A very touching poem so beautifully written. Timeless. Marvellous lines - so insightful.

ellauri054.html on line 300: Ah, love, let us be true Äh, kulta, ollaan tosissaan
ellauri054.html on line 315: And he said to her, 'Try to be true to me,
ellauri054.html on line 318: Well now, I knew this girl. It's true she had read
ellauri060.html on line 466: A traditional pastoral folk song the popular form of which dates to the mid-19th century. It is largely believed to have been sung commonly during the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857, though no credible source seems to confirm it. If it were true the song likely predates the 19th century, though no published copies of the work exist.
ellauri060.html on line 470: This song may be of quite recent origin, since almost half of the known examples are sound recordings, and there's only one broadside printing. On the other hand, there's an older and widely printed broadside Jimmy and his True Love, which might well be an earlier version—or it may just be a song with universal appeal and a good chorus that people still enjoy singing. Of the 40 or so instances in Roud, most are from the south west of England or East Anglia—though Gavin Greig collected a dozen examples in Scotland in the early years of last century. No other Sussex version has been collected.
ellauri060.html on line 486: Now a sailor and his true love were a-walking one day.
ellauri060.html on line 487: Said the sailor to his true love, “I am bound far away.
ellauri061.html on line 201: August Wilhelm Schlegel työnsi myös lusikkansa soppaan. Schlegel perceived unity in the multiple plot lines. He noted that the donkey's head is not a random transformation, but reflects Bottom's true nature. Eli se oli oikeasti oikea aasi. Ovelaa. Hyvin ajateltu Robin! He identified the tale of Pyramus and Thisbe as a burlesque of the Athenian lovers.
ellauri062.html on line 100: Fred, a retired psychologist who had a very successful practice, now makes rude and cruel comments to those around him. One of his strengths before Alzheimer's had been his kindness and ability to relate to others.
ellauri062.html on line 443: Trve kvlt on joku raskasmetallimeemi, true cult vekkulisti kirjoitettuna.
ellauri062.html on line 640: Tantus labor non sit cassus. nyt jo anna anteeksi. Työtä älä hukkaan heitä. Now 'twere cruel if I failed thee.
ellauri062.html on line 672: Judicandus homo reus. Tuomittava syypää homo. Men come forth, O be not cruel:
ellauri062.html on line 936: The so called "New World Order" conspiracy is the modern term for the age old Satanic conspiracy, led by elite Jewry -- the aim being the enslavement of humanity, destruction of the true Israelites (the Anglo-Saxon and Germanic peoples of European descent), mass human population reduction, abolition of religion and national sovereignty, and the establishment of a totalitarian world government ruled by Satan via the jews.

The ultimate goal of Judaism is rule of the world by Satan, and to literally unleash hell upon the earth. 

Are you aware that Martin Luther wrote a treatise called "On the Jews and Their Lies", warning Christians in the most serious terms of the destructive influence of the jews, and advocating their banishment from European society? Luther was very knowledgeable of the religion, nature, origins, and influence of the Jews - having actually read the Talmud and written large parts of the Bible. Luther describes the Jews as an accursed, malicious, greedy, cunning, treacherous, thieving, and greatly evil people, who are descended from the very people who murdered the Messiah, who deeply hate Christianity and God's people, and are working in every possible way to undermine and destroy Western Christian civilization. Among other things, Luther rubbishes the Talmud, including its vicious hatred of Jesus and Christians, as well as relishing the many times Jews have been expelled from European nations.
ellauri062.html on line 942: The star they call the star of David is actually called the star of Moloch in scripture and is the symbol of Judaism as well. It´s strange that very few people realize this. This is true. It is also called in scripture the
ellauri062.html on line 944:

Its true and accurate name is the "Seal of Solomon", in reference to the
ellauri063.html on line 33: History is the only true teacher, the revolution the best school for the proletariat. Rosa Luxemburg
ellauri066.html on line 257: However, in scripture Rachel became fertile eventually and bore Jacob two biological children, Benjamin and Joseph. This aspect of the story, which is not in the show, actually makes Gilead's handmaid/forced surrogate system seem even more cruel and archaic and emphasizes even more the barbarity and evil of the despotic dogma that is the basis of the theocratic Gilead regime."
ellauri067.html on line 363: Foil: In fiction or non-fiction, a foil is a character who contrasts with another character; most of the time it is the protagonist, to highlight qualities of the other character. In some cases, a subplot can be used as a foil to the main plot. This is especially true in the case of metafiction and the story within a story motif. The word foil comes from the old practice of backing gems with foil to make them shine more brightly. Paranoids like Pynchon make foil hats to foil conspiracies.
ellauri069.html on line 283: Maailman Sota IIn aikana Syyskuussa 1944, Sakun voimat tähtäävät V-2 roketteja Lontooseen, Englantiin. Amerikan sotilas rue" data-amplitude="[Book] Character Analysis tab" data-crosslinktype="Characters">Alokas Laiskiais-Entropia
ellauri069.html on line 286: Aiempi hullusuoja lähellä Lontoota liikanimellä "Valkoinen Vizaus" majoittaa ryhmää hyypiöitä sekaantuneina tsygologiseen sodankäyntiin. Hörhöryhmä tunnetaan alkukirjainlyhenteellä KALAT. Henkilökunta sisältää tilastotieteilijän, Roger Mexikon, ja behavioristizygologin, Edward "Ned" rue" data-amplitude="[Book] Character Analysis tab" data-crosslinktype="Characters">Poinzimiehen.
ellauri069.html on line 299: Laiskiainen, Täti Vihreä, ja Nalle Läski lähetetään Ranskan Rivieralle, missä he pysähtyvät lomakohteeseen. Niiden ekana päivänä siellä, ne piknikoivat biitsillä joidenkin naisten kaa (tietysti). Muu nainen, muukalainen, joutuu mustekalan hyökkäämäxi. Alokas koittaa mäsätä mustekalan pään pullolla. Läski tuottaa liian-kätevän ravun, käskien Laiskiaisen houkutella mustekalan pois ruualla. Alokas epäilee juonta jonkinlaista. (Se olisikin eka tässä kirjassa.) Hän on oikea. Mussetkala on Poinzimiehen Grigori! Hyökkäys on lavastettu saadaxeen Laiskiaisen yhteen hollantilaisen naisen kaa, rue" data-amplitude="[Book] Character Analysis tab" data-crosslinktype="Characters">Katje Borgesius, entinen Nazi yhteispeluri ja nyt KALAT toimija.

Alokas, tämä
ellauri069.html on line 313: Vetelys matkustaa Nordhauseniin, Sachsa, missä V-2 roketit rakennettiin. Matkalla hän tapaa rue" data-amplitude="[Book] Character Analysis tab" data-crosslinktype="Characters">Katkeron, kurssihereron aiemmasta Sachsan siirtolasta Etelä Länsi Aahrikassa, ja Suurehkon Mervin, rasistisen Amerikan upseerin. Katkero ja Mervi ovat myös kiinnostuneita V-2 rockets. (Ainoo joka alkaa väsyä on lukija.)
ellauri069.html on line 315: Nordhausenissa, Laiskis viettää yön izekuvatun noidan Geli Trippingin jalkovälissä. Hänen rakastajansa, ryssä rue" data-amplitude="[Book] Character Analysis tab" data-crosslinktype="Characters">Aivastus,
ellauri069.html on line 363: rue" href="https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Gravitys-Rainbow/summaries/" class="bsg_nextSection_action" data-amplitude="[Book] Next Button">Part Summaries
ellauri069.html on line 387: Don’t forget the real business of the War is buying and selling. The murdering and violence are self-policing, and can be entrusted to non-professionals. The mass nature of wartime death is useful in many ways. It serves as spectacle, as diversion from the real movements of the War. It provides raw material to be recorded into History, so that children may be taught History as sequences of violence, battle after battle, and be more prepared for the adult world. Best of all, mass death’s a stimulus to just ordinary folks, little fellows, to try ‘n’ grab a piece of that Pie while they’re still here to gobble it up. The true war is a celebration of markets.
ellauri069.html on line 483: An article recently came out in the LA Times about Pynchon’s Great American Novel. The article begins by stating that Mason and Dixon is actually the most obvious candidate for the Great American Novel, and it instead suggests that Gravity’s Rainbow is perhaps the Great European Novel. The article then questions whether or not the Great American Novel even exists, and if it does if it is of a singular form or if it takes on many forms at once. After considering this question, the article finally claims that the Great American Novel is actually made up of all of Pynchon’s works fused together “into one epic Pynchoverse.” The Great American Novel certainly does not need to take place in America, but still many will argue that Gravity’s Rainbow by itself can never be considered as the Great American Novel because of its non-American setting and its wide array of characters. This is definitely debatable, but I do enjoy the idea of a “Pynchoverse” or a Pynchon Compilation being considered as the true Great American Novel. That being said, I do think most readers and Pynchonerds would undoubtedly say that Gravity's Rainbow is the Greatest Pynchon Novel.
ellauri069.html on line 622: Ritari ja minnelaulaja Tannhäuser on ollut pitkään Venusbergissä (Hörselberg Eisenachin lähellä) jumalatar Venuksen rakastajana. Hän on kuitenkin kyllästynyt ja pyytää Venusta päästämään hänet pois, mutta Venus kieltäytyy ja yrittää suostutella häntä jäämään. Lopulta Tannhäuser julistaa pelastuksensa olevan Mariassa, jolloin Venus katoaa ja Tannhäuser huomaa olevansa laaksossa lähellä Wartburgin linnaa. Hänen ohitseen kulkee joukko pyhiinvaeltajia matkalla Roomaan. Paikalle saapuu metsästysseurue, jota johtaa maakreivi Hermann mukanaan joukko minnelaulajia. Nämä tunnistavat Tannhäuserin ja pyytävät häntä tulemaan Wartburgin linnassa pidettävään laulukilpailuun. Tannhäuser ei aluksi halua tulla heidän mukaansa, mutta muuttaa mielensä, kun ritari Wolfram von Eschenbach, yksi minnelaulajista, kertoo maakreivin veljentytär Elisabethin ikävöineen Tannhäuseria siitä asti, kun tämä lähti. Tannhäuser suostuu lähtemään seurueen mukaan.
ellauri069.html on line 663: Yes true love´s a many-splendored thing
ellauri069.html on line 697: Drake is a sort of modern-day Robin Hood. He donates the proceeds of his latest robbery to fund the stalled construction of the "New Social Institute". He even writes a book, "Crackerjack": The true story of my exploits, which becomes a bestseller.
ellauri069.html on line 783: Other putative allegorical devices of the book include the Wicked Witch of the West as a figure for the actual American West; if this is true, then the Winged Monkeys could represent another western danger: Indigenous peoples of the Americas. The King of the Winged Monkeys tells Dorothy, "Once we were a free people, living happily in the great forest, flying from tree to tree, eating nuts and fruit and doing just as we pleased without calling anybody master. ... This was many years ago, long before Oz came out of the clouds to rule over this land."
ellauri070.html on line 340: In Jewish Kabbalistic cosmology of Isaac Luria, the qlippot are metaphorical "shells" surrounding holiness. They are spiritual obstacles receiving their existence from God only in an external, rather than internal manner. Divinity in Judaism connotes revelation of God's true unity, while the shells conceal holiness, as a peel conceals the fruit within. They are therefore synonymous with idolatry, the root of impurity through ascribing false dualism in the Divine, and with the Sitra Achra (סטרא אחרא "Other Side"), the perceived realm opposite to holiness. They emerge in the descending seder hishtalshelus (Chain of Being) through Tzimtzum (contraction of the Divine Ohr), as part of the purpose of Creation. In this they also have beneficial properties, as peel protects the fruit, restraining the Divine flow from being dissipated. Kabbalah distinguishes between two realms in qlippot, the completely impure and the intermediate.
ellauri070.html on line 428: Foster sai ensimmäisen laulunsa julkaistuksi 17-vuotiaana, mutta piti lauluntekoa harrastuksenaan ja elätti itseään kirjanpitäjänä Ohion Cincinnatissä. Pian hän muutti takaisin Pittsburghiin ja alkoi päätoimiseksi lauluntekijäksi paikalliselle minstrel show -seurueelle. Tältä ajalta on peräisin valtaosa hänen tunnetuimmista sävelmistään. Foster kuoli New Yorkissa 37-vuotiaana.
ellauri071.html on line 248: rue">
ellauri071.html on line 254: rue" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:0.802ex; height:2.176ex;" alt="i"> sijaan on käytössä kolme ei-reaalista akselia ">
ellauri071.html on line 263:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:0.802ex; height:2.176ex;" alt="i"> ">
ellauri071.html on line 272:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex; margin-left: -0.027ex; width:0.985ex; height:2.509ex;" alt="j"> ja ">
ellauri071.html on line 281:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:1.211ex; height:2.176ex;" alt="k">. Kvaternionit voidaan myös ymmärtää reaaliluvun ja kolmiulotteisen vektorin yhdistelmäksi. Kvaternio on muotoa ">
ellauri071.html on line 299:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:15.906ex; height:2.509ex;" alt="{\displaystyle t+xi+yj+zk}">, jossa ">
ellauri071.html on line 308:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:0.84ex; height:2.009ex;" alt="t">, ">
ellauri071.html on line 317:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:1.33ex; height:1.676ex;" alt="x">, ">
ellauri071.html on line 326:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:1.155ex; height:2.009ex;" alt="y"> ja ">
ellauri071.html on line 335:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:1.088ex; height:1.676ex;" alt="z"> ovat reaalilukuja ja ">
ellauri071.html on line 344:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:0.802ex; height:2.176ex;" alt="i">, ">
ellauri071.html on line 353:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex; margin-left: -0.027ex; width:0.985ex; height:2.509ex;" alt="j"> ja ">
ellauri071.html on line 362:
rue" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:1.211ex; height:2.176ex;" alt="k"> ovat peruskvaternioita. Imaginääristen peruskvaternioiden laskusäännöt määrittää kaava
ellauri071.html on line 367: rue">
ellauri071.html on line 400: rue" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:24.858ex; height:3.009ex;" alt="{\displaystyle i^{2}=j^{2}=k^{2}=ijk=-1\,}">
ellauri073.html on line 70: Se on kerännyt Kulmalan videoista kaikista eniten katselukertoja, ja kommenttiboksi on täynnä nauruemojeita. Kommentteja ovat jättäneet muun muassa näyttelijä Krista Kosonen, laulaja Ellinoora sekä toimittaja Ina Mikkola.
ellauri073.html on line 173: The Drama of the Gifted Child: The Search for the True Self, Revised Edition Paperback – January 1, 1997 by Alice Miller (Author).
ellauri073.html on line 454: Photo by Victoria Lynn Hogan, my true love and colleague, shows a rather hairless dense looking guy peering inquiringly at a little plastic jar containing some goo.
ellauri073.html on line 508: She was born May 14, 1938, in Fort Fairfield, Maine. The daughter of a potato farmer, she worked a quarter of the year during the harvest, but found her true passion for learning in the town’s one-room schoolhouse. She eventually graduated from Northfield boarding school in Gill, Mass., and later became the first in her family to graduate college, with a bachelor’s degree in English from Mount Holyoke in 1960, where she was student body president and wrote Junior Show.
ellauri074.html on line 247: One way he would get people to do this is by making them do a firewalk over a bed of hot embers. Most people at his seminars normally thought that would be impossible. By showing them that they can walk on fire, it helped the attendees see that they had preconceived notions that weren’t true. (The trick is to wear thick-soled shoes with a huge carbon footprint.)
ellauri074.html on line 518: MATHIAS ORTLIEB: Hej Sara! Börja med att se om du online kan hitta information om självhjälp vid ångest, avslappning, mindfulness och information om vad ångest är. Börja med det och testa ett antal övningar under några veckor, blir det sämre så kontakta mig med foto bifogat. Spela massvis computerspel tex Outlast och Manhunt 2. Kolla också dopingtips på mina MKUltra sidor. Pröva True-fit väst.
ellauri074.html on line 577: SYDNEY GOTTLIEB: Hej Maria! Stort tack för din fråga, mycket igenkänning här! Jag tänker på två saker, det ena är att vissa situationer kan man inte göra så mycket åt (tyvärr) vilket innebär att vi behöver arbeta med vår acceptans av läget. Människan vill väldigt gärna förändra saker och det fort, men många situationer går inte att påverka så som man vill. Pandemin är delvis ett sådant exempel. Att därför jobba med att ”gilla läget” och släppa taget om att allt måste ändrar är en viktig del i att fungera bättre just nu. Det andra är att det går att påverka sitt mående genom att acceptera läget så som det är och hitta nya strategier för att möta situation. Ge dig själv lite tid att tänka, ”ok det är inte toppen just nu, men kan jag ändå engagera mig i vissa aktiviteter som får mig att må bra? även om jag egentligen vill göra annat? kan jag hitta nya aktiviteter som fungerar bra i pandemin?. Kan jag göra mig lycklig på egen hand?" (Nej stopp Maria lilla jag blev så kåt av den tanken att jag måste ta en liten paus för att få bort min True-fit väst ...) Om vi enbart använder oss av ”gamla” strategier för välmående så kommer dessa inte vara anpassade efter läget just nu, våga testa nya saker! Mitt telefonnummer hittar du här nedan.
ellauri074.html on line 606:

True fit


ellauri074.html on line 608: True fit - sukkanauhaliivin päähyötyihin kuuluvat:
ellauri074.html on line 640: True-fit ryhtiliivit muistuttavat epäilyttävästi Nuutti-koiran valjaita. Niitäkään en saa millään puetuxi päälle. Tarkoitan siis Nuutille. Dont get me wrong.
ellauri077.html on line 440: Your neighbor's vision is as true for him as your own vision is true for you.
ellauri077.html on line 627: This process does not lead to a passive, solely pleasurable experience such as taking a drug or watching television. Instead, what awaits that reader is a book that forces her “‘to work hard to access its pleasures, the same way that in real life true pleasure is usually a by-product of hard work and discomfort’” (McCaffery 119). Perhaps the most difficult aspect of Infinite Jest (and the one for which it is fated to be infamously known) is the use of endnotes, which will be our entry into thinking of Infinite Jest as a conversation-text.
ellauri077.html on line 808: It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Petain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality.
ellauri080.html on line 231: data-tracking-container="true"
ellauri080.html on line 498: These two views of the world are, of course, mutually inimical — they inevitably chase each other’s tails. Nietzsche says to Hume: ‘he stole that bread because he wanted to feed his family,’ to which Hume replies, ‘yes, that is true: but why did he want to feed his family? Because he is adhering to a familial principle,’ to which Nietzsche replies, ‘I suppose you could put it that way, but why is he operating according to that principle? It’s because he wants to, because he loves his family,’ to which Hume replies, ‘yes, but why does he love his family? It’s because that is his logical worldview…’ And so on.
ellauri080.html on line 518: The other axis seeks to discover, cognate, or comprehend the true nature of things (SI) by compositing the uniting elements between various creative perspectives on things (NE); the image I like to use here is of a diagram showing multiple perspectives of a 3-D object in 2-D space, where each perspective conceals something in order to reveal something else.
ellauri080.html on line 520: A good example of this mentality can be found in the theories of Michel Foucault, who himself describes society as a series of power structure grids you can lay on top of the truth in order to reveal some things but conceal others, and our goal essentially should be to experiment with various power grids to discover the true limits or bounds of how human society can successfully be structured. Another example could be Martin Heidegger’s discussion of Being or existence, and how many different perspectives are required to observe it and get a full picture, because of our extremely subjective position in relation to the nature of our own existence, not to mention existence within the ever shifting realm of time.
ellauri080.html on line 528: Meanwhile, the NE/SI axis is not so trusting of direct experience, which is hardly a mystery, because their perception of reality is introverted, meaning they aren’t interested in direct and photographic reality, but in the ideal versions of experiences abstracted from reality (e.g. Socrates’ search for the overarching ‘idea’ of everyday things like dogs, beds, piety, etc., as opposed to individual instances of these things). This is why, as CelebrityTypes also points out, “The person will also be more careful and meticulous (SI) because there is an unconscious striving to contribute one’s observations to building a system which is valid not just in the here and now, but which is perceived to be true in general: To generate the type of knowledge that could conceivably end up in a future textbook on the subject.” The axis makes use of Ne’s multifaceted nature to accomplish this.
ellauri080.html on line 803: “After long study and experience I have come to the conclusion that (1) all religions are true; (2) all religions have some error in them; (3) all religions are almost as dear to me as my own Hinduism.” He could not tell a lie, but did not shirk from contradiction.
ellauri080.html on line 850: Vipassanā (Pāli) or vipaśyanā (Sanskrit) literally "hyper, super (vi), seeing (passanā)", is a Buddhist term that is often translated as "insight". The Pali Canon describes it as one of two qualities of mind which is developed (bhāvanā) in Buddhist meditation, the other being samatha (mind calming). It is often defined as a form of meditation that seeks "insight into the true nature of reality", defined as anicca "impermanence", dukkha "suffering, unsatisfactoriness", anattā "non-self", the three marks of existence in the Theravada tradition, and as śūnyatā "emptiness" and Buddha-nature in the Mahayana traditions.
ellauri080.html on line 1008: 1961 Disney-filmi nimeltä 101 Dalmatialaista on naamatusten eettisessä pulmatilanteessa kun filmin konna Cruella De Vil ("Julma Paholaismainen Nainen"), rikas ja materialistinen nainen, tarjoo suuren summan ostaaxeen pentueen dalmatialaisenpentuja omistajalta Rogerilta. Roger on olevinaan että pennut eivät ole kaupan. Kuitenkin, Cruella ei ota “eitä" vastauxexi. Muutamaa viikkoa myöhemmin hän varastuttaa pennut Rogerilta kätyreillään Jasper ja Horace.
ellauri080.html on line 1010: Selvästi tämä tilanne on äärimmäinen ja muistuttaa jonkin verran nurkanvaltausta.Se on hyvin epäeettinen koska se on lainvastainen eikä hyödytä ketään muuta kuin Cruellaa (no jonkun verran myös Jasperia ja Horacea, ja ehkä 100 muuta apinaa jotka saavat ostaa Cruellalta kohta suloisia koiranpentuja). Siis eritelkäämme tätä tilannetta toiselta kulmalta. Jos olisit Cruellan (kieltämättä epämukavissa korko)kengiss, mikä olisi järkevin izetesti sen määräämisexi, onko perustelusi eettinen? (Vihje: mitä tapahtuisi jos lehti, tuomari tai perheesi tietäisi päätöxestäsi? No onnexi ne ei tiedä!) (Vihje 2: oikea vastaus ei ole a) eikä c).)
ellauri082.html on line 101: The biography by Tyrannosaurus Max paints a less than flattering portrait of Wallace. That’s not to say it’s a vicious takedown—it’s probably about as even-handed as a biography about the author is going to be, and I can imagine books about him in the future being a lot less level-headed in either direction. Basically, DFW was an extremely troubled individual and probably not a very awesome person qua person. He was often misanthropic, violent, cruel (especially to women), and self-absorbed. But what’s great about the biography is how it allows these rather hideous characteristics to disgust as well as inform; knowing the uglier aspects of DFW’s personality is extremely enlightening with regard to his work. It seems to me that the writer was extremely aware of his immense character flaws and sought in his work (his novels and his non-fiction particularly) to overcome them, and in his work he was able to occupy a wholly different realm than he was in his actual life. Well actually not at all that different. The books project a rather nasty person too.
ellauri089.html on line 145: Even more surprising, the sociological aspects of these books have also stood up well over the years. Boys today may not be quite as innocent about girls as they appear to be in most of Heinlein’s juveniles (perhaps at the request of Scribner’s editor Alice Dalgliesh), but the various interpersonal relationships (boy-girl, parent-child, sibling-sibling) do still ring quite true. Today’s young readers may have to ask what a “soda jerk” is, but they will have no trouble understanding why Kip, the hero of Have Space Suit—Will Travel, tosses a chocolate milkshake all over his tormentor.
ellauri089.html on line 437: § 17. but a relation, of the former kind, if true at all, will be true of all cases. All ordinary ethical judgments assert causal relations, but they are commonly treated as if they did not, because the two kinds of relations are not distinguished. …
ellauri089.html on line 447: § 22. and the other, upon which most stress has been laid, can be true of no whole whatsoever, being a self-contradictory conception due to confusion. …
ellauri089.html on line 483: § 38. The method pursued in this chapter will consist in exposing the reasons commonly offered for the truth of Hedonism and in bringing out the reasons, which suffice to shew it untrue, by a criticism of J. S. Mill & H. Sidgwick. …
ellauri089.html on line 572: § 81. and, once this analogy between Volition and Cognition is accepted, the view that ethical propositions have an essential reference to Will or Feeling, is strengthened by another error with regard to the nature of Cognition—the error of supposing that "perception" denotes merely a certain way of cognising an object, whereas it actually includes the assertion that the object is also true. …
ellauri089.html on line 652: § 116. But (3) granted that the appropriate combination of these two elements is always a considerable good and may be a very great one, we may ask whether, where there is added to this a true belief in the existence of the object of cognition, the whole thus formed is not much more valuable still. …
ellauri089.html on line 658: § 119. if, however, we attempt to avoid being biased by these two facts, it still seems that mere true belief may be a condition essential to great value. …
ellauri089.html on line 676: § 128. but pleasure and pain are completely analogous in this, that pleasure by no means always increases, and pain by no means always decreases, the total value of a whole in which it is included: the converse is often true. …
ellauri092.html on line 157: In matters of sexuality, several Baptist churches are promoting the virginity pledge to young Baptist Christians, who are invited to engage in a public ceremony at sexual abstinence until Christian marriage. This pact is often symbolized by a purity ring. Programs like True Love Waits, founded in 1993 by the Southern Baptist Convention have been developed to support the commitments.
ellauri092.html on line 213: Baptists, as their very name implies, adhere to baptism. But not just any baptism – Baptists are more specific on the issue. Baptist subscribe to credo baptism by immersion. That means that they believe in baptism of a confessing believer by immersion into water. They reject pedobaptism and other modes of baptism (sprinkling, pouring, etc.). This is one distinctive that holds true for nearly all Baptist denominations and churches. They are Baptists, after all!
ellauri092.html on line 253: Baptists are traditionally mixed on the Calvinism-Arminianism debate. Few would call themselves true Arminians, and most Baptists would probably self-describe as modified (or moderate) Calvinists – or 4 point Calvinists, rejecting especially the doctrine of Limited Atonement. In contrast to Methodists, most all Baptists believe in the eternal security of a Christian, though many hold to a view of this that is very different from the Reformed doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints.
ellauri092.html on line 273: Those involved with the Keswick Movement were continuationists otherwise known as anti-cessationists. These folks then (as well as today), believed the sign gifts including tongues never stopped. History as well as Scripture tells us that this is not true; that in fact, the sign gifts did actually cease not long after the last apostle died and the Bible had finished being written (though not yet compiled into Canon).
ellauri092.html on line 324: The emphasis of Keswick is that you are never holy enough. Certainly, this is true. However, I am on the path to greater holiness as God recreates within me the perfect character of His Son, which will not be completed until I reach eternity. This is God’s work of sanctification.
ellauri092.html on line 507: Leilan mukautumiskyky oli ilmiömäinen. Esimerkkinä Leilan mukautumiskyvystä mainizen 24 vuorokautta kestäneen matkan Durbanista etelä-Afrikasta Buenos-Aireslin. Laiva oli pienehkö ja puutteellisesti varustettu. Niinpä ei ollut lääkäriäkään mukana. Leila rouva hankki kaiken varalta runsaat säilyke-eväät. Tuli sitten niin ankaria myrskyjä, että suorastaan hengenvaara oli kysymyksessä. Mottin täytyi tilata laivan puusepältä erityinen suojus, jotta Leila ei putoaisi vuoteesta. Itse hän asettui lattialle makaamaan. Reippaalla mielellä he silti pysyivät, ja hytissä Leila hoiteli eväs-emännyyttänsä, milloin syöminen kävi päinsä ja palveluskuntakin oli avuton. Toisen kerran heidän oli pakko Japanin merellä matkustaa hytittömässä laivassa ja kaiken yötä maata pitkällään, pidellen kiinni kanteen ruuvatun pöydän jalasta, jotta eivät sinkoaisi yli laidan. Olipa Mottilla uskollisia ja sieviä palkallisia sihteereitäkin. Eräs, jota ei merikipu vaivannut, kiinnitti kirjoituskoneensa laivapöytään ja izensä samoin sängynpäätyyn, voidaksensa hoitaa välttämättömiä tehtäviä. Tietysti heillä oli ihaniakin matkoja, jolloin koko seurue nautti meri-ilmasta ja näköaloista, jopa kansipeleilläkin hankki terveellistä
ellauri094.html on line 352: When dealing with skeptics’ claim of Bible contradictions it seems one can never be reminded enough of what exactly is a contradiction. A contradiction occurs when two or more claims conflict with one another so that they cannot simultaneously be true in the same sense and at the same time. To put it another way, a Bible contradiction exists when there are claims within the Bible that are mutually exclusive in the same sense and at the same time.
ellauri095.html on line 107: The term Uranian was quickly adopted by English-language advocates of homosexual emancipation in the Victorian era, such as Edward Carpenter and John Addington Symonds, who used it to describe a comradely love that would bring about true democracy, uniting the "estranged ranks of society" and breaking down class and gender barriers. Oscar Wilde wrote to Robert Ross in an undated letter (?18 February 1898): "To have altered my life would have been to have admitted that Uranian love is ignoble. I hold it to be noble—more noble than other forms."
ellauri095.html on line 176: Another 1997 study from pro-homosexual researchers who were trying defend homosexuals, examined data of AIDS deaths between 1987 to 1992 in Toronto, and found that the life expectancy for the homosexual men was 8 to 20 years lower than heterosexuals. See also Atheism and life expectancy. Religious people live on average four years longer than their agnostic and atheist peers, new research has found. Actually, the atheists´ life expectancy is way lower than true believers´ (estimated at about one infinity). Source: Conservopedia.
ellauri095.html on line 227: Several issues led to a melancholic state and restricted his poetic inspiration in his last five years. His workload was heavy. He disliked living in Dublin, away from England and friends. He was disappointed at how far the city had fallen from its Georgian elegance of the previous century. His general health suffered and his eyesight began to fail. He felt confined and dejected. As a devout Jesuit, he found himself in an artistic dilemma. To subdue an egotism that he felt would violate the humility required by his religious position, he decided never to publish his poems. But Hopkins realised that any true poet requires an audience for criticism and encouragement. This conflict between his religious obligations and his poetic talent made him feel he had failed at both.
ellauri096.html on line 67: In response to the apparent conflict between freedom and foreknowledge, medieval philosophers denied that future contingent propositions have a truth-value. That´s silly. They took themselves to be extending a solution Aristotle discusses in De Interpretatione to the problem of logical fatalism. According to this truth-value gap approach, ‘You will take a dump tomorrow’ is not true now. The prediction will become true tomorrow. A morally serious theist can agree with the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam:
ellauri096.html on line 74: Cod’s omniscience only requires that He knows every true proposition. God will know ‘You will take a shit’ as soon it becomes true – like when the turd is halfway out - but not before. Naah, this is really weak. That takes no omniscience, just a good nose.
ellauri096.html on line 75: The teacher has free will. Therefore, predictions about what he will do are not true (prior to the examination). Accordingly, Paul Weiss (1952) concludes that the student’s argument falsely assumes he knows that the announcement is true. The student can know that the announcement is true after it becomes true – but not before. What a wimpy argument.
ellauri096.html on line 90: W. V. Quine (1953) agrees with Weiss’ conclusion that the teacher’s announcement of a surprise test fails to give the student knowledge that there will be a surprise test. Yet Quine abominates Weiss’ reasoning. Weiss breeches the law of bivalence (which states that every proposition has a truth-value, true or false). Quine believes that the riddle of the surprise test should not be answered by surrendering classical logic. Me too. Right on Willard van Orman Quine! Thumbs up!
ellauri096.html on line 92: W. V. Quine insists that the student’s elimination argument is only a reductio ad absurdum of the supposition that the student knows that the announcement is true (rather than a reductio of the announcement itself). He accepts this epistemic reductio but rejects the metaphysical reductio. Given the student’s ignorance of the announcement, Quine concludes that a test on any day would be unforeseen.
ellauri096.html on line 94: In later writings, Quine evinces general reservations about the concept of knowledge. One of his pet objections is that ‘know’ is vague. If knowledge entails absolute certainty, then too little will count as known. Quine infers that we must equate knowledge with firmly held true belief. Asking just how firm the belief must be is akin to asking just how big something has to be to count as being big. There is no answer to the question because ‘big’ lacks the sort of boundary enjoyed by precise words.
ellauri096.html on line 96: There is no place in science for bigness, because of this lack of boundary; but there is a place for the relation of biggerness. Here we see the familiar and widely applicable rectification of vagueness: disclaim the vague positive and cleave to the precise comparative. But it is inapplicable to the verb ‘know’, even grammatically. Verbs have no comparative and superlative inflections … . I think that for scientific or philosophical purposes the best we can do is give up the notion of knowledge as a bad job and make do rather with its separate ingredients. We can still speak of a belief as true, and of one belief as firmer or more certain, to the believer’s mind, than another (1987, 109).
ellauri096.html on line 100: It is true that some borderline cases of a qualitative term are not borderline cases for the corresponding comparative. But the reverse holds as well. A tall man who stoops may stand less high than another tall man who is not as lengthy but better postured. Both men are clearly tall. It is unclear that ‘The lengthier man is taller’. Qualitative terms can be applied when a vague quota is satisfied without the need to sort out the details. Only comparative terms are bedeviled by tie-breaking issues.
ellauri096.html on line 147: , he also believes that at least of one these answers is false. This ensures he believes a contradiction. If any of his answers is false, then the student believes a contradiction (because the only falsehoods on the question list are contradictions). If all of his test answers are true, then the student believes the following contradiction: ∼(A1&A2&…&A100)
ellauri096.html on line 155: In the twentieth century, suspicions about conceptual pathology were strongest for the liar paradox: Is ‘This sentence is false’ true? Philosophers who thought that there was something deeply defective with the surprise test paradox assimilated it to the liar paradox. Let us review the assimilation process.
ellauri096.html on line 159: Just as someone’s awareness of a prediction can affect the likelihood of it being true, awareness of that sensitivity to his awareness can also affect its truth. If each cycle of awareness is self-defeating, then there is no stable resting place for a conclusion.
ellauri096.html on line 175: If (K-0) is true then it known to be false. Whatever is known to be false, is false. Since no proposition can be both true and false, we have proven that (K-0) is false. Given that proof produces knowledge, (K-0) is known to be false. But wait! That is exactly what (K-0) says – so (K-0) must be true.
ellauri096.html on line 182: Is (K) true? On the one hand, if (K) is true, then what it says is true, so no one knows it. On the other hand, that very reasoning seems to be a proof of (K). Proving a proposition is sufficient for knowledge of it, so someone must know (K). But then (K) is false! Since no one can know a proposition that is false, (K) is not known.
ellauri096.html on line 184: The skeptic could hope to solve (K-0) by denying that anything is known. This remedy does not cure (K). If nothing is known then (K) is true. Can the skeptic instead challenge the premise that proving a proposition is sufficient for knowing it? This solution would be particularly embarrassing to the skeptic. The skeptic presents himself as a stickler for proof. If it turns out that even proof will not sway him, he bears a damning resemblance to the dogmatist he so frequently chides.
ellauri096.html on line 189: Trivially, false propositions cannot be proved true. Are there any true propositions that cannot be proved true?
ellauri096.html on line 191: Yes, there are infinitely many. Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorem demonstrated that any system that is strong enough to express arithmetic is also strong enough to express a formal counterpart of the self-referential proposition in the surprise test example ‘This statement cannot be proved in this system’. If the system cannot prove its “Gödel sentence”, then this sentence is true. If the system can prove its Gödel sentence, the system is inconsistent. So either the system is incomplete or inconsistent. (See the entry on Kurt Gödel.)
ellauri096.html on line 199: Several commentators on the surprise test paradox object that interpreting surprise as unprovability changes the topic. Instead of posing the surprise test paradox, it poses a variation of the liar paradox. Other concepts can be blended with the liar. For instance, mixing in alethic notions generates the possible liar: Is ‘This statement is possibly false’ true? (Post 1970) (If it is false, then it is false that it is possibly false. What cannot possibly be false is necessarily true. But if it is necessarily true, then it cannot be possibly false.) Since the semantic concept of validity involves the notion of possibility, one can also derive validity liars such as Pseudo-Scotus’ paradox: ‘Squares are squares, therefore, this argument is invalid’ (Read 1979). Suppose Pseudo-Scotus’ argument is valid. Since the premise is necessarily true, the conclusion would be necessarily true. But the conclusion contradicts the supposition that argument is valid. Therefore, by reductio, the argument is necessarily invalid. Wait! The argument can be invalid only if it is possible for the premise to be true and the conclusion to be false. But we have already proved that the conclusion of ‘Squares are squares, therefore, this argument is invalid’ is necessarily true. There is no consistent judgment of the argument’s validity. A similar predicament follows from ‘The test is on Friday but this prediction cannot be soundly deduced from this announcement’.
ellauri096.html on line 206: Assume there is a true sentence of the form ‘p but p is not known’. Although this sentence is consistent, modest principles of epistemic logic imply that sentences of this form are unknowable.
ellauri096.html on line 265: no test is given by Thursday, the student will find the announcement incredible. At the beginning of the week, the student does not know (or believe) that the teacher will wait that long. A principle that tells me to defer to the opinions of my future self does not imply that I should defer to the opinions of my hypothetical future self. For my hypothetical future self is responding to propositions that need not be actually true.
ellauri096.html on line 275: The points made so far suggest a solution to the surprise test paradox (Sorensen 1988, 328–343). As Binkley (1968) asserts, the test would be a surprise even if the teacher waited until the last day. Yet it can still be true that the teacher’s announcement is informative. At the beginning of the week, the students are justified in believing the teacher’s announcement that there will be a surprise test. This announcement is equivalent to:
ellauri096.html on line 279: Consider the student’s predicament on Thursday (given that the test has not been on Monday or Wednesday). If he knows that no test has been given, he cannot also know that (A) is true. Because that would imply
ellauri096.html on line 303: is true, I know that any evidence against p is evidence against something that is true; I know that such evidence is misleading. But I should disregard evidence that I know is misleading. So, once I know that h is true, I am in a position to disregard any future evidence that seems to tell against p (1973, 148).
ellauri096.html on line 529: Galgalim (galgallim "spheres", "wheels", "whirlwinds" גַּלְגַּלִּים; singular: galgal, גַּלְגַּל), also called ophanim (Hebrew "wheels" ōphannīm אוֹפַנִּים; singular: ōphān, ofan אוֹפָן), refer to the wheels seen in Ezekiel's vision of the chariot (Hebrew merkabah) in Ezekiel 1:15–21. One of the Dead Sea scrolls (4Q405) construes them as angels; late sections of the Book of Enoch (61:10, 71:7) portray them as a class of celestial beings who (along with the Cherubim and Seraphim) never sleep, but guard the throne of God.
ellauri096.html on line 710: La reconnaissance de Frantz Fanon en France fut tardive. Fort-de-France possède désormais une avenue à son nom bien que la proposition qu´en avait faite son maire Aimé Césaire, en 1965, eût été rejetée pendant des années. Il faut attendre 1982 pour que s´organise, sous l´impulsion de Marcel Manville, un mémorial international (colloque) en son honneur en Martinique. Peu à peu, plusieurs hommages lui sont rendus dans son île natale. Le lycée de La Trinité est baptisé en son honneur, la ville de Rivière-Pilote lui consacre une avenue et une bibliothèque. En France métropolitaine toutefois, s´il existe de nombreuses rues portant ce nom, David Macey signale n´avoir trouvé aucune avenue Frantz Fanon. En Algérie, dès 1963, une avenue Frantz Fanon est inaugurée à Alger. La reconnaissance dépasse désormais ces deux pays et la mémoire de Frantz Fanon est honorée dans de nombreux pays (Italie, Nigeria, États-Unis) où des centres de recherche ont été baptisés à sa mémoire.
ellauri097.html on line 113: In the summer of 1926, Mencken followed with great interest the Los Angeles grand jury inquiry into the famous Canadian-American evangelist Aimee Semple McPherson. She was accused of faking her reported kidnapping and the case attracted national attention. There was every expectation that Mencken would continue his previous pattern of anti-fundamentalist articles, this time with a searing critique of McPherson. Unexpectedly, he came to her defense by identifying various local religious and civic groups that were using the case as an opportunity to pursue their respective ideological agendas against the embattled Pentecostal minister. He spent several weeks in Hollywood, California, and wrote many scathing and satirical columns on the movie industry and Southern California culture. After all charges had been dropped against McPherson, Mencken revisited the case in 1930 with a sarcastic and observant article. He wrote that since many of that town´s residents had acquired their ideas "of the true, the good and the beautiful" from the movies and newspapers, "Los Angeles will remember the testimony against her long after it forgets the testimony that cleared her."
ellauri097.html on line 151: Is there anything in the general thinking of theologians which makes their opinion on the point of any interest or value? What have they ever done in other fields to match the fact-finding of the biologists? I can find nothing in the record. Their processes of thought, taking one day with another, are so defective as to be preposterous. True enough, they are masters of logic, but they always start out from palpably false premises.
ellauri097.html on line 258: Julien Green est né à Paris, 4, rue Ruhmkorff, de parents américains, descendant du côté de sa mère du sénateur et représentant démocrate de la Géorgie au congrès américain Julian Hartridge (en) (1829-1879) et dont Julien Green porte le prénom (Green a été baptisé « Julian » ; l'orthographe a été changée en « Julien » par son éditeur français dans les années 1920). Il grandit dans le 16e arrondissement de Paris, puis au Vésinet et passe ses vacances dans la commune d'Andrésy, dans les Yvelines. Il poursuit toutes ses études en France au lycée Janson-de-Sailly. Sa mère, protestante pieuse et aimante, meurt alors qu'il a 14 ans, et la famille déménage rue Cortambert, à Paris. Il se convertit au catholicisme en 1916, à la suite de son père et de toutes ses sœurs, ainsi qu'il le raconte dans Ce qu'il faut d'amour à l'homme, son autobiographie spirituelle. Il abjure l'anglicanisme à la crypte de la chapelle des sœurs de la rue Cortambert. Âgé de seulement 17 ans, Julian Green réussit à rejoindre les rangs de la Croix-Rouge américaine, puis est détaché dans l’artillerie française en 1918 en tant que sous-lieutenant et sert en Italie. Démobilisé en mars 1919, il se rend pour la première fois aux États-Unis en septembre de la même année et effectue trois ans d'études à l’université de Virginie, où il éprouve un premier amour chaste et secret pour un camarade d'études. Il écrit son premier livre en anglais, avant de revenir vivre en France.
ellauri097.html on line 424: The Protestant parson is the grandfather of German philosophy. The theologians’ instinct in the German scholars divined what Kant had once again made possible. The conception of a “true world,” the conception of morality as the essence of the world … were once again, thanks to a wily and shrewd skepticism, if not provable, at least no longer refutable. Kant’s success is merely a theologian’s success. [The Antichrist §10.]
ellauri098.html on line 405: In Carlyle’s book On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in Society (Carlyle, 1840), somebody (most likely the author) dove into the lives of several men he deemed “heroes,” like Muhammed, Richard Wagner, Shakespeare, Martin Luther, and Napoleon. He believed that history “turned” on the decisions of these men, and encouraged others to study these heroes as a way of discovering one’s own true nature.
ellauri098.html on line 542: Other personalities can find ESTPs exhausting to keep up with, and it’s true they can leave a trail of wreckage in their wake as they bull ahead. But there’s rarely any malice in them, and they’re always fun to be with.

ellauri099.html on line 63: It is quite true I have worshipped you with far more romance of feeling than a man should ever give to a friend. Somehow I have never loved a woman…. From the moment I met you, your personality had the most extraordinary influence over me…. I adored you madly, extravagantly, absurdly. I was jealous of everyone to whom you spoke. I wanted to have you all to myself. I was only happy when I was with you.
ellauri099.html on line 188: It is said that Aristotle was a difficult character — somewhat arrogant, thinking he was cleverer than everyone else (quite possibly true) and even criticizing his headmaster of many years, Plato. (Who was quite a butthead in comparison.) He was a perhaps a bit of a dyskolos, a grouch, cantankerous, a curmudgeon.
ellauri100.html on line 291: Finally, I am strongly inclined toward justice. And I mean justice, not “fairness”, which is an excuse for leveling. True justice consists of two things, and only two things: the enforcement of voluntary, mutual obligations, and the punishment of wrongdoing. (Why the enforcement if the obligations are voluntary? Ever think they might be only kinda semi-voluntary?)
ellauri100.html on line 463: The scale you just completed was the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, developed by Douglas Crowne and David Marlowe (1960). This scale measures social desirability concern, which is people’s tendency to portray themselves favorably during social interaction. Each of the 33 true-false items that you just filled out describes a behavior that is either socially acceptable but unlikely, or socially unacceptable but likely. As a result, people who receive high scores on this measure may be more likely to respond to surveys in a self-promoting fashion.
ellauri101.html on line 157: Inner Heroes is my contemporary presentation of the four temperaments and it is designed to help people look inward and discover their true greatness, their inner hero. As each hero takes their own unique journey they become the hero of their own life.
ellauri102.html on line 433: « Écoutez, nous sommes juste des femmes étudiant l'ingénierie, pas forcément des féministes prêtes à marcher dans les rues criant que nous sommes contre les hommes, juste des étudiantes cherchant à mener une vie normale. »
ellauri105.html on line 102: It’s early days yet, but this is where Biden’s true genius as a politician may lie: he has turned his likability into a moderating asset, suggesting that an ideological agenda when offered by a relatively non-ideological salesman does not sound all that threatening.
ellauri106.html on line 35: Some consider his best novel, My Life as a Man. He was awarded the 2010 National Humanities Medal by President Barack Obama at the White House in 2011. He died of congestive heart failure on May 22, 2018, at age 85. True — he never won the Nobel Prize for literature. D´oh.
ellauri106.html on line 78: In the American trilogy, the resurrected alter ego Zuckerman discovers the true identities of the protagonists of a sports idol in American Pastoral ( American Idyll, 1997), a radio star in I Married a Communist ( My Man, the Communist, 1998) and a professor emeritus in The Human Stain ( The Human Blemish, 2000) against the backdrop of changing American eras. American Pastoral was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1998 and is considered "a remarkable example of a literary interpretation of the descent of the initially so confident [American] post-war white society into the depths of uncertainty" as a result of the Vietnam War .
ellauri106.html on line 421: And this, too, is surely true of religion. In prehistoric times, Homo sapiens was deeply endangered. Early humans were less fleet of foot, with fewer natural weapons and less well-honed senses than all the predators that threatened them. Moreover, they were hampered in their movements by the need to protect their uniquely immature young - juicy meals for any hungry beast. We had less natural protection against repeated changes of climate than other species - yet we survived. Human spirituality would have played an important part.
ellauri106.html on line 428: Noniin justiinsa, siitähän uskonnossa on koko ajan kysymys, lisääntykää ja täyttäkää aivan tukkoon maa. Tosta Franklista ja sen mädistä ideoista on jo paasattu. Se oli se uunista karannut kermaperse logoterapeutti. Joku kompromissihakuisempi rue">Lilian Naidaan Pennistä (varmasti jutku) ehdotti 2016 että
ellauri106.html on line 631: No one can accuse Roth of ever hiding who he was: American, Jewish, obsessed with sex, obsessed with death, funny, angry, wise, profane, imaginative, cruel. That is what cruel readers always liked about him.
ellauri107.html on line 156: "I have, for instance, never—I repeat, never—written a word about women in general. This will come as news to my harshest critics, but it’s true. Women, each one particular, appear in my books. But womankind is nowhere to be found.” They just happen to be assholes one and all. Men are so much nicer friends.
ellauri107.html on line 466: He serenely believed that the one purpose of the real-estate business was to make money for George F. Babbitt. True, it was a good advertisement at Boosters' Club lunches, and all the varieties of Annual Banquets to which Good Fellows were invited, to speak sonorously of Unselfish Public Service, the Broker's Obligation to Keep Inviolate the Trust of His Clients, and a thing called Ethics, whose nature was confusing but if you had it you were a High-class Realtor and if you hadn't you were a shyster, a piker, and a fly-by-night. These virtues awakened Confidence, and enabled you to handle Bigger Propositions. But they didn't imply that you were to be impractical and refuse to take twice the value of a house if a buyer was such an idiot that he didn't jew you down on the asking-price.
ellauri107.html on line 474: “Course I don't mean to say that every ad I write is literally true or that I always believe everything I say when I give some buyer a good strong selling-spiel. You see—you see it's like this: In the first place, maybe the owner of the property exaggerated when he put it into my hands, and it certainly isn't my place to go proving my principal a liar! And then most folks are so darn crooked themselves that they expect a fellow to do a little lying, so if I was fool enough to never whoop the ante I'd get the credit for lying anyway! In self-defense I got to toot my own horn, like a lawyer defending a client—his bounden duty, ain't it, to bring out the poor dub's good points? Why, the Judge himself would bawl out a lawyer that didn't, even if they both knew the guy was guilty! But even so, I don't pad out the truth like Cecil Rountree or Thayer or the rest of these realtors. Fact, I think a fellow that's willing to deliberately up and profit by lying ought to be shot!”
ellauri108.html on line 110: Practitioners of Rastafari identify themselves with the ancient Israelites—God's chosen people in the Old Testament—and believe that black Africans broadly or Rastas more specifically are either the descendants or the reincarnations of this ancient people. This is similar to beliefs in Judaism, although many Rastas believe that contemporary Jews' status as the descendants of the ancient Israelites is a false claim. Rastas typically believe that black Africans are God's chosen people, meaning that they made a covenant with him and thus have a special responsibility. Rastafari espouses the view that this, the true identity of black Africans, has been lost and needs to be reclaimed.
ellauri108.html on line 414: Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, however, worshipped only the One True God, and they refused to bow down to the false idol. They were brought before Nebuchadnezzar to face their fate but remained courageous in the face of the king's demand to bow down before the golden statue. They said:
ellauri108.html on line 463: Practitioners of Rastafari identify themselves with the ancient Israelites—God's chosen people in the Old Testament—and believe that black Africans broadly or Rastas more specifically are either the descendants or the reincarnations of this ancient people.[102] This is similar to beliefs in Judaism,[103] although many Rastas believe that contemporary Jews' status as the descendants of the ancient Israelites is a false claim.[104] Rastas typically believe that black Africans are God's chosen people, meaning that they made a covenant with him and thus have a special responsibility. Rastafari espouses the view that this, the true identity of black Africans, has been lost and needs to be reclaimed. Some Rasta sects reject the notion that a white European can ever be a legitimate Rasta.
ellauri110.html on line 135: It is possible to interpret the Houyhnhnms in a number of different ways. One interpretation could be a sign of Swift's liberal views on race, or one could regard Gulliver's preference (and his immediate division of Houyhnhnms into color-based hierarchies) as absurd and the sign of his self-deception. It is now generally accepted that the story involving the Houyhnhnms embody a wholly pessimistic view of the place of man and the meaning of his existence in the universe. In a modern context the story might be seen as presenting an early example of animal rights concerns, especially in Gulliver's account of how horses are cruelly treated in his society and the reversal of roles. The story is a possible inspiration for Pierre Boulle's novel Planet of the Apes.
ellauri111.html on line 255: As I’d had to admit, I hadn’t read The Diary of a Writer (actually a kind of journal that Dostoevsky published monthly and that consisted entirely of his own thoughts about issues of the day), but I did know that he had been involved in several criminal cases, some of which were about the kind of cruelty to children that Ivan Karamazov cited as evidence against the existence of God. I couldn’t remember any details, though. I felt rather like a student who hasn’t done his homework hoping that he’s not the one going to be asked the next question. Only there wasn’t anyone else to ask. In the event, Fyodor Mikhailovich let me off fairly gently.
ellauri111.html on line 391: [L]et God be true, but every man a liar...( Romans 3:4)
ellauri111.html on line 723: There has been a lot of talk about "aliens" for some time and the talk continues; some kind of sky show may be in the future. If you see something in the air, it is not because there are true aliens. But what about devils? yes there are devils; what about oversized genetically modified organisms and chimeras? maybe; possessed people? yes there are; 3D pictures, yes; pheromones, yes; unrevealed inventions and laws, in all probability, yes. If you hear a voice, see lights, or whatever, compare everything to the Bible--we believe in the Bible above our senses. This is a time of deception. You will not be deceived if you read and obey the scriptures. Read Matthew 24 (and other passages as well) for what is going to happen when the Lord returns. An excerpt--
ellauri112.html on line 675: Tully’s like a hip millennial Marry Poppins. It all seems too good to be true. Their deepening connection hints at something that’s either eerie or profoundly healing. Are they dykes?
ellauri112.html on line 707: Tully seems too good to be true when she quickly organizes the home, cleans it from top to bottom, and finds a place for all the errant toys too. She even makes cupcakes for Marlo to take to Jonah’s school as a peace offering. Ultimately, Tully becomes the ‘spouse’ Marlo really needs, and they even have a simpatico banter together, quipping back and forth in sharp, pithy dialogue, the only way Cody can write for her characters.
ellauri112.html on line 842: In his book, What Would Jesus Drink, Brad Whittington breaks down the biblical references of alcohol into three types. In all, there are 247 references to alcohol in Scripture. 40 are negative (warnings about drunkenness, potential dangers of alcohol, etc.), 145 are positive (sign of God´s blessing, use in worship, etc.), and 62 are neutral (people falsely accused of being drunk, vows of abstinence, etc.) The Bible is anything but silent on the issue of wine. The bible, like tequila, must be imbued carefully, seen as a blessing, and received with a grain of salt. It must not be abused. The old saying is true, "Wine is from God, drunkenness is from the Devil."
ellauri115.html on line 387: Wounded feelings gave rise to a bitter three-way quarrel between Rousseau and Madame d'Épinay; her lover, the journalist Grimm; and their mutual friend, Diderot, who took their side against Rousseau. Diderot later described Rousseau as being "false, vain as Satan, ungrateful, cruel, hypocritical, and wicked... He sucked ideas from me, used them himself, and then affected to despise me".
ellauri115.html on line 1085: Lidija Rangelovska is the owner and CEO of Narcissus Publications and the editor of Sam Vaknin's works, including of "Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited" as well as many other books and ebooks about topics in psychology, relationships, philosophy, economics, international affairs, and award-winning short fiction. She lives in Skopje with her husband, Sam Vaknin. She featured in other documentaries together with her husband ("Egomania" by channel 4 in the UK and "Moi, narcissique et cruel" on Radio-Television Suisse).
ellauri115.html on line 1089: In his view, narcissists have lost their "true self", the core of their personality, which has been replaced by delusions of grandeur, a "false self". Therefore, he believes, they cannot be healed, because they do not exist as real persons, only as reflections: "The False Self replaces the narcissist's True Self and is intended to shield him from hurt and narcissistic injury by self-imputing omnipotence ... The narcissist pretends that his False Self is real and demands that others affirm this confabulation," meanwhile keeping his real-life imperfect true self under wraps.
ellauri117.html on line 602: Locke suoritti hum.kanditutkinnon vuonna 1656, maisterin vuonna 1658 ja lääketieteen kandin tutkinnon vuonna 1674. Vuonna 1666 hän tapasi Shaftesburyn ensimmäisen jaarlin Anthony Ashley Cooperin, joka oli tullut Oxfordiin hakemaan hoitoa maksatulehdukseen. Locke teki vaikutuksen Cooperiin ja tämä houkutteli hänet liittymään seurueeseensa. Mitä vetoa että Locke tuli Oxfordissa maxapalaan?
ellauri117.html on line 618: Joka tapauksessa Locke joutui pakenemaan Alankomaihin vuonna 1683 epäiltynä osallisuudesta Rye House -vehkeilyyn, vaikkakaan hänen suorasta osallisuudestaan ei ole juurikaan todisteita. (Rye House Plot oli whigien muka-murha-ja-vallankaappausyritys katolismielisiltä Stuarteilta, ennen Wilhelm Oranialaisen mainiota vallankumousta 1688.) Alankomaissa Lockella oli jälleen aikaa kirjoittamiselle, ja hän käytti paljon aikaa Essayn työstämiseen ja teoksen A Letter Concerning Toleration kirjoittamiseen. Locke palasi kotiin vasta mainion vallankumouksen jälkeen vuonna 1688, jolloin hän matkusti takaisin Englantiin Vilhelm III Oranialaisen vaimon seurueessa. Locken palattua Englantiin hänen kaikki merkittävimmät teoksensa julkaistiin lyhyen ajan sisällä.
ellauri118.html on line 390: Bel-tenebros oli Amadixen peitenimi sekobolzina. Komee pimee. Miraflores oli joku paikka joka on mainittu enemmän kuin kerran. Joo se oli se paikka kolmen viemäriputken lähellä jossa Amadis pyrki Orianan hilloviivalle. Taisi päästäkin? "por ganar la gloria de la demanda en la prueva de bien amar". Se on myös joku kunta Columbiassa, se on missä Keiko Fujimorin häitä vietettiin, ja se on ylellinen 5 tähden useasti palkittu Miraflores, joka sijaitsee Costa del Solilla Espanjassa Marbellan ja Fuengirolan puolivälissä. Aurinkorannikko sopii hyvin ympärivuotiseen lomailuun aurinkoisen ja lämpimän ilmaston ansiosta. Costa del Sol tunnetaan myös nimellä Costa del Golf, lukuisien golfkenttien ansiosta. Helkutti aurinkoa tässä enää kaivataan. Ja mikä hemmetti se on että termiittiapinan on pakko tehdä kaikesta monokulttuuria. Mirafiores indeed. Mä kazon lupiininkukkia Rauhixen mäellä ja remmon niitä irti maasta. Se on haitallinen vieraslaji, matukukka. Se tappaa kotimaiset lajit ja tekee täkäläiset kimalaiset mahoixi. Sellaista symbolismia.
ellauri118.html on line 733: In this so Am´rous cruel strife, Tässä julman lemmekkäässä taistossa
ellauri118.html on line 822: Il meurt accidentellement à l´âge de quarante ans : le 30 juin 1559, lors d’un tournoi tenu rue Saint-Antoine à Paris (devant l´ancien hôtel des Tournelles), il est blessé d´un éclat de lance dans l´ œil par Gabriel de Montgommery, capitaine de sa garde écossaise. Il en meurt dix jours plus tard.
ellauri118.html on line 1008: In one particularly cruel scene, Serena takes Offred to see that her daughter is alive. That doesn't happen in the book.
ellauri118.html on line 1068: Danny sanoo radiolähetyksessä päättäneensä, ettei koskaan eroaisi vaimostaan. Armi kuitenkin eräänä päivänä kysyi, menisikö Danny hänen kanssaan naimisiin. – Sitten kun tämä hetki tuli, jolloin Armi kysyi mennäänkö naimisiin, sanoin joo, mennään naimisiin edellyttäen, että sinä et enää juo viinaa ja jätät tuon seurueen, Danny kertoo. Aavikon sisko Marja-Liisa Kauranen kommentoi Dannyn kertomusta Ilta-Sanomille. Kauranen sanoo, että Dannyn sanat antavat tilanteesta vääristyneen kuvan, sillä naimisiin menosta oli puhetta jo ennen Aavikon alkoholisoitumista. Kaurasen mukaan naimisiin meno ei siis riippunut yksin hänen siskostaan tai tämän sairastumisesta. Pari ei saanut koskaan virallisesti toisiaan. Danny Lipsanen oli koko suhteen ajan naimisissa Liisa Lipsasen kanssa mutta sai säännöllisesti Armilta kosteata pillua.
ellauri119.html on line 160: In the season one episode "True or False Face," when Batman and Robin figure out that False Face's next robbery target is the Ladd Armored Car Company, Robin shouts out "holy bouncy boilerplate!" Yes, you are correct. That does, indeed, not make any sense.
ellauri119.html on line 434: The Apostle Paul glorified love as the most important virtue of all. Describing love in the famous poetic interpretation in 1 Corinthians, he wrote, "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, and always perseveres." (1 Cor. 13:4–7, NIV) He didn't mean eros, but rather homophilia. Perseveraatiosta oli puhe. John also wrote, "Dear friends, let us love one another for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love." (1 John 4:7–8, NIV) Influential Christian theologian C. S. Lewis wrote a book called The Four Loves. The first retired nazi pope Benedict XVI named his first circular God as love. He said that a human being, created in the image of God, who is love, is able to make love; to give himself to God and others (agape) and by receiving and experiencing God's love in contemplation (eros). This life of love, according to him, is the life of the saints such as Teresa of Calcutta and the Blessed Virgin Mary and is the direction Christians take when they believe that God loves them. Pope Francis taught that "True love is both loving and letting oneself be loved...what is important in love is not our loving, but allowing ourselves to be loved by God." That's just what Virgin Mary did. "You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect." – Matthew 5: 43–48. Jews didn't like tax collectors.
ellauri119.html on line 518: Examples of ludus in movies include Dangerous Liaisons [Okay!], Cruel Intentions, and Kids. Ludic lovers want to have as much fun as possible. When they are not seeking a stable relationship, they rarely or never become overly involved with one partner and often can have more than one partner at a time, in other words a school of partners. They don't reveal their true thoughts and feelings to their partner(s), especially if they think they can gain some kind of advantage over their partner(s). The expectation may also be that the partner(s) should also be similarly minded. If a relationship materializes it will be about having fun and indulging in activities of varying degrees of learnedness together. This love style carries the likelihood of infidelity. In its most extreme form, ludic love can become sexual addiction. No Lee's recognizable traits.
ellauri119.html on line 553: Pragma comes from the Greek term πρᾶγμα, meaning "businesslike", from which terms like "pragmatic" are derived. Lee defines pragma as the most practical type of love, not necessarily derived out of true romantic love. Rather, pragma is a convenient type of love.
ellauri119.html on line 654:
Point 1: Every Claim Proved True

ellauri119.html on line 656: I recall reading her claim that the Founding Fathers explicitly rejected only one form of government - Democracy! Democracy!? Really?, I thought. There is no way that could be true. But reading the Federalist Papers, there it was.
ellauri119.html on line 672: The answer to “why” comes from our nature. Man is required to make decisions in order to survive. We cannot make proper decisions without guidance. We could rely on society to provide guidance or just follow conventional wisdom, but that is the cheap way out. It makes you a slave to the opinions others. And that is not true to human nature. Man has a mind which is his only means of survival. Rand teaches that you must use it to make your own decisions, not to mimick the thoughts and actions of others. This is the answer to the second question, yes it is necessary.
ellauri119.html on line 684: She is good at writing a thriller novel and carries a hypnotic theme that keeps the reader absorbed and lends to a subtle brainwashing/indoctrination toward her worldview. That doesn´t make it right, just believable, and, unfortunately, too many people think that believable means it is true. Believable just means that you can be fooled.
ellauri119.html on line 688: From a philosophical viewpoint, Ayn Rand´s objectivism is an inconsistent pile of faulty axioms and absurd conclusions. Her tautological A = A and her invalid claim that all thought is verbal have been shown, long ago, to be either useless information or demonstrably false. Wittgenstein dismissed tautologies as telling us anything new about the world before Rand came to the USA and phenomenology had dismissed a verbal mentalese grammar of the brain. Noam Chomsky´s innate grammar is only true for words, but thoughts are far more than just words since all thought appears to be motor based. What you might need is a grammar of the body instead. Thoughts seem to be closer to the movements of an athlete than to the words in a sentence. For some reason most people ignore that all speech is base on wagging the tongue, and the vibrations in middle ear and cochlea, a motor based capability that we have learned to use to communicate with. Is there an isomorphism between the movement of the tongue and those of sign language that would show a fundamental grammar shared by both?
ellauri131.html on line 358: Canafield married Judith Ohlbaum in 1971 and they had two sons together, Oran and Utan, before divorcing in 1976. Canafield left the family and moved in with a masseuse in 1976, while his wife was pregnant with their second son. His son Oran has written two memoirs, Freefall: The Strange True Life Growing Up Adventures of Oran Canafield and Long Past Stopping: A Memoir.
ellauri131.html on line 361: Motivational speakers Jack Canafield and Mark Victor Hansen collaborated on the first Chicken Coop for the Soul book, compiling inspirational and true stories they had heard from their audience members. Many of the stories came from members of the audience of their inspirational talks. The book was rejected by major publishers in New York but accepted by a small, self-help publisher in Florida called HCI.
ellauri131.html on line 368: In the Teenage Hole IV, Huge Pole in a Teenage Hole w/out "French Letters", the Teenage Hole Personal Organizer, Get Teenage Hole on Love & Friendship, Get Teenage Hole on Tough Stuff, the Teenage Hole: The Real Deal Challenges, Jack Canafield, the Teenage Hole: The Real Deal Friends, the Teenage Hole: The Real Deal School, Teenage Hole: Think Positive, Thanks Mom, Thanks to My Mom. Think Positive. Think Possible. Think Positive about Kids. Think Possible about Kids. Time to Jive. Teenage Hole Touched By a Business Angel, Tough Times Tough People, Traveling salesmen, A Tribute to Home Moms, True Love on The Doormat, Unlocking the Secrets to Living In Your Dreams, Snake Oil for the Unsinkable Soul, for the Veterans, for the Volunteers Foul, Volunteering and Giving Paw, that's what I Learned From The Dog, for the Writer's Block, for the Woman's Hole, to Inspire a Woman's Hole #1, New York Times Bestseller, A Second Round at the Woman's Hole, Woman into Woman, the Woman Golfer's Hole, the Hole at Work, Working at The Woman's Hole, Wife Lessons For MILF Women, Culo de Pollo para el Alma de los Padres, – in Spanish.
ellauri131.html on line 960: And what of the true cynic's view, that the lesson of history is that bastards often prevail? That markets are in and of themselves rational, and sometimes emotional, but rarely ever moral? That an appropriate model for business is not an extended family but a poker game? The late genius John von Neumann was fascinated by poker, and his study of the choice making involved in the game led him to develop the foundations of game theory. Von Neumann was a peerless student of the principles of rational self-interest, and he was also an adviser to Presidents Truman and Eisenhower. When the Soviets showed signs of developing nuclear weapons, he recommended bombing them into oblivion. Game theory, he said, dictated it.
ellauri133.html on line 359: His brother George was murdered by It in the first pages of the book and his parents are very cold to him afterward. He has a stutter, which is important to the plot a few times. As an adult, he’s a successful horror novelist and is married to an actress named Audra. IT is not a work of fiction and Stephen King is actually "Stuttering Bill" Denbrough. In reality Steve was born in Portland, Maine and moved away when he was young with his Mother and older brother after abandonment by his father and witnessing a fatal train accident of a play friend. He returned at age 11 to Maine from Conn. and founded The Losers Club in Derry after unsuppressing the true death of his little friend by the railway tracks when he was 2 (as told in his 1981 book Danse Macabre). Now living inbetween Lovell and Bangor, King travels regularly past Derry near Derry Mountain in Linconville and can recollect most of the past due to the closer proximity and is preparing for Pennywises awakening in 2038. Lähde: FanTheory. - Does anyone think Bill Denborough´s stutter was a bit too much? That each word was stirred too much to have a nice flow? - B-b-b-beep - beep, Ruh-ruh-Richie. B-big Bill is puh-puh-PERFECT!
ellauri133.html on line 433: While this may be true, there are also many sexual scenarios which involve the male characters, and even some stories that do not contain any form of sexual innuendo. Every tale is not the same.
ellauri133.html on line 847: This anecdote has been found to be untrue. Jackson exaggerated the ease with which the story was published; in “Biography of a Story,” she said The New Yorker published her story a mere few weeks after she submitted it, and that they only made one change—the date of the lottery. In fact, New Yorker editor Gus Lobrano suggested several changes to the story via phone, including additions to dialogue and action, which Jackson made.
ellauri135.html on line 577: It was rumored that Richter was homosexual and that having a female companion provided a social front for his true sexual orientation, because homosexuality was widely taboo at that time and could result in legal repercussions. Richter was an intensely private person and was usually quiet and withdrawn, and refused to give interviews. He never publicly discussed his personal life until the last year of his life when filmmaker Bruno Monsaingeon convinced him to be interviewed for a documentary.
ellauri140.html on line 132: Una F+, the personification of the "True Church". She travels with the Redcrosse Knight (who represents England), whom she has recruited to save her parents´ castle from a dragon. She also defeats Duessa, who represents the "false" (Catholic) church and the person of Mary, Queen of Scots, in a trial reminiscent of that which ended in Mary´s beheading. Una is also representative of Truth. Aku Ankalla oli paleoliittinen väkivahva ihailija nimeltä Una joka ei osannut minä-sanaa. Kymingatar Elisabet sanoi aina me. We are not amused.
ellauri140.html on line 178: Wrath (M) – He carries a branding iron and a dagger as he rides a lion. His clothes are ripped and contain blood stains. He acts quickly in fits of rage, but often repents; "Ne car'd for blood in his avengement: / But when the furious fitt was overpast, / His cruel facts he often would repent. Vihan vika ei ole vihaaminen as such, vaan äkkipikasuus, harkinnan puute. Don't get mad, get even. Olkaa viattomia kuin pulut ja kavalia kuin käärmeet.
ellauri140.html on line 310: The cruel markes of many'a bloudy fielde; Monta valkovuotoa ja verijälkeä.
ellauri140.html on line 324: Right faithfull true he was in deede and word, Se oli hyvin uskovainen ize teossa,
ellauri140.html on line 387: Seemd in their song to scorne the cruell sky. Taisivat pilaa tehdä taivaasta.
ellauri140.html on line 739: And fittest for to forge true-seeming lyes; Näistäpä se valkkas 2.
ellauri140.html on line 875: Most like that virgin true, which for her knight him took. Ihankin kuin neizyt, joxka nuppi sitä luuli.
ellauri140.html on line 892: Shall I accuse the hidden cruell fate, Syytänkö mää piileviä ja julmaa Darwinta,
ellauri140.html on line 1056: That had such might over true meaning harts: selkään, eze oli niin hyvän nixin kekannut,
ellauri141.html on line 404: The solfege system (Do, Re, Mi), which is the theme of a song by the Von Trapp children, is just a small sample of Horace's all-pervasive influence on western culture, even among people who might never have heard the name Quintus Horatius Flaccus. Horace was not just a superb literary craftsman, but a musician, songwriter and entertainer for the Roman elite, creating a new Latin idiom derived from Greek lyric song. A final chapter, "Horace, Guido and the Do-re-mi Mystery", the result of careful research and detective work, argues that Guido d'Arezzo, an eleventh-century Benedictine choirmaster, used the melody of Horace's Ode to Phyllis (alla) to invent the do-re-mi mnemonic, but applied it to an eighth-century Hymn to John the Baptist ("Ut queant laxis") by Paul the Deacon, keeping the true source secret. A musical comparison of the Horatian melody and Guido's version of "ut-re-mi" is included. Lyons' verse translation of the Odes was named a Financial Times Book of the Year (1996) and was welcomed as 'a wonderful rendering of one of the great, central poets in the European tradition.'
ellauri141.html on line 505: In the classics, that is Latin, he was no more than an ordinary boy, but he gave the impression that if he thought it essential for his literary ambitions, he would tackle it to good purpose. But somehow he did not so think, and he made no effort to acquire a vocabulary or memorise Latin words—consequently, his construes were sometimes a succession of errs and hums waiting and hoping for the form-master kindly to supply the missing translation. (5)
ellauri141.html on line 507: Kipling himself confessed that ‘every Latin quantity was an arbitrary mystery’ to him, that his teacher Crofts ‘loathed me as to Latin’ and that he had construed the beginning of the Cleopatra Ode (1.37) very badly on one occasion. It was M'Turk/Beresford who composed the Latin elegiacs translating Gray’s Elegy which Stalky and Beetle needed to prepare.
ellauri141.html on line 519: ... Here is my defence of this alleged wicked waste of time. The reason why one has to parse and construe and grind at the dead tongues in which certain ideas are expressed is … because only in that tongue is that idea expressed with absolute perfection…. by a painful and laborious acquaintance with the mechanism of that particular tongue; by being made to take it to pieces and put it together again, and by that means only, we can arrive at a state of mind in which … we can realise and feel and absorb the idea.
ellauri142.html on line 63: Markku is an outcast. The awkward, illegitimate son of a dazzlingly wealthy Count, he was educated in France but returns to Russia now that his father’s health is in decline. Polite society shuns him for his hero-worship of Napoleon and enthusiasm for the politics of revolution. But his blundering sincerity charms Andrei, his truest friend; and the blonde air hostess Natacha, who delights in his presence. He is quickly married off by stealth through the manipulation of others around him and is likely to face further heartache given that his wife prefers bedding her brother. It looks like this unlikely hero is smitten with her mother Pirkko Hiekkala but is set for heartache given his kind and gentle nature.
ellauri142.html on line 102: At the turn of the 16th Century, William Schaw developed his own club-like culture, housed within a lodge, and infused with a set of rules for sworn members, including, “They shall be true to one another and live charitably together as becometh sworn brethren and companions of the Craft.”
ellauri143.html on line 66: The Dravidar Kazhagam, founded by social activist Periyar, is known for conducting Thirukkural conferences across the state. Its deputy president Kali Poongundran said that this shows the BJP’s true motives behind promoting Thirukkural.
ellauri143.html on line 67: “The varnasrama dharma (racial segregation law) is the base for the BJP’s ideology. But Thirukkural is exact opposite. It is habitual for the party to use opposing ideas and then claim they are their own. Conducting more number of Thirukkural conferences will help the public know about the true meaning of Thirukkural and they can understand how the BJP is tweaking it for their own cause,” he said.
ellauri143.html on line 190: If wife be wholly true to him who gained her as his bride,

ellauri143.html on line 233: Decorum's true nobility on earth;

ellauri143.html on line 275: Who 're good indeed, on earth begirt by ocean's gruesome tide?

ellauri143.html on line 535: The second is, no untrue word to say.
ellauri143.html on line 572: Renunciation made- even here true pleasures men acquire;

ellauri143.html on line 801: Explanation: True greatness fears the society of the base; it is only the low - minded who will regard them as friends.
ellauri143.html on line 910: By punishment of death the cruel to restrain,

ellauri143.html on line 923: Since true benignity, that grace exceeding great, resides

ellauri143.html on line 1161: True friends, well versed in loving ways,

ellauri143.html on line 1309: These are the signs, they say, of true nobility.
ellauri143.html on line 1396: Explanation : A man's true manliness consists in making himself the head and benefactor of his family. (Mitä vittua?)
ellauri143.html on line 1415: Explanation : Even thin gruel is ambrosia to him who has obtained it by labour.
ellauri143.html on line 1566: I grieve, 'tis pain to me to hear him cruel chid,

ellauri143.html on line 1570: I am greatly pained to hear you call him a cruel man, just because your shoulders are reduced and your bracelets loosened. Tää selitys on aika törkeä! Eli poinzi on, että syytä ämmä vaan izeäsi kun olet rupsahtanut, ei se ole äijän vika.
ellauri145.html on line 60: L´humeur sombre de Breton s´exprime pleinement dans ce que Mark Polizzotti appelle le « passage le plus sinistre du manifeste » et qui est selon lui le reflet d´une grande « amertume personnelle », une phrase souvent citée et reprochée à Breton, notamment par Albert Camus : « L´acte surréaliste le plus simple consiste, révolvers aux poings, à descendre dans la rue et à tirer au hasard, tant qu´on peut, dans la foule.» Täähän trendaa nykyäänkin, kun sillä pääsee 6 sekunnixi klikkimeediaan. Polizzotto Salvo Montalbano miehineen puuttuu asiaan.
ellauri145.html on line 68: Breton meni naimisiin kolme kertaa. Ensin hän avioitui Simone Kahnin kanssa syyskuussa 1920. Toisen vaimon, Jacqueline Lamban, kanssa hänellä on Aube-niminen tytär. Kolmas vaimo on nimeltään Elisabeth Claro. Breton kuoli 28.9.1966 ja hänet haudattiin Batignolles’n hautausmaalle Pariisiin. Hautakiveen on kaiverrettu teksti ”Je cherche l’or du temps” (”Etsin koko ajan kultaa”). Bretonin leski ja tytär yrittivät tarjota osoitteessa 42 rue Fontaine sijainneen ateljeen taidekokoelmia Ranskan valtion lunastettavaksi, mutta valtio ei halunnut ostaa Bretonin yksityiskokoelmaa. Bretonin jäämistö huutokaupattiin keväällä 2003. No entäs tämä Soupault? Silläkin oli 3 vaimoa. Hän jäi unohduksiin samalla kun hän kirjoitti unohduksesta mutta sai jälleen 1980-luvulla huomiota ja palkintoja, ja teoksista otettiin uusia painoksia. Comme il le racontera dans ses entretiens sur France Culture, il rencontra même par hasard dans un ascenseur Hitler et son aide de camp. Il regrettera de ne pas avoir eu un revolver à ce moment-là. De même, il croisa un jour Staline et fut surpris par l´expression cruelle de son visage. Ce jour-là, il le vit boire 24 vodkas dans une réception mais on lui affirma que Staline les jetait discrètement sans les boire.
ellauri145.html on line 212:

Charles Pierre Baudelaire naît le 9 avril 18215 au 13 rue Hautefeuille6 à Paris : ses parrain et marraine sont les parents « adoptifs » de sa mère, Pierre Perignon et Louise Coudougnan7. Celle-ci, Caroline Dufaÿs, a vingt-sept ans. Son père, Joseph-François Baudelaire, né en 1759 à La Neuville-au-Pont8, en Champagne, est alors sexagénaire. Quand il meurt en 1827, Charles n´a que cinq ans. Cet homme lettré, épris des idéaux des Lumières et amateur de peinture, peintre lui-même, laisse à Charles un héritage dont il n´aura jamais le total usufruit. Il avait épousé en premières noces, le 7 mai 1797, Jeanne Justine Rosalie Janin, avec laquelle il avait eu un fils, Claude Alphonse Baudelaire, demi-frère de Charles.
ellauri145.html on line 231: No 6 rue Le Regrattier: maison où Baudelaire logea sa maîtresse Jeanne Duval, dite la Vénus noire. De retour à Paris, Charles s´éprend de Jeanne Duval, une « jeune mulâtresse » avec laquelle il connaît les charmes et les amertumes de la passion. Une idylle au sujet de laquelle certains de ses contemporains, comme Nadar, se sont interrogés en s´appuyant sur les déclarations d´un amant de Jeanne Duval et de prostituées connues, qui témoignent au contraire de la chasteté surprenante de Baudelaire.
ellauri145.html on line 356: Ne distrait plus le front de ce cruel malade ; Ei julman sairaan oza enää siliä,
ellauri145.html on line 406: After the trial, Kenealy instigated a popular radical reform movement, the Magna Charta Association, which championed the claimant´s cause for some years. Kenealy was elected to Parliament in 1875 as a radical independent but was not an effective parliamentarian. The movement was in decline when the claimant was released in 1884, and he had no dealings with it. In 1895, he confessed to being Orton, only to recant almost immediately. He lived generally in poverty for the rest of his life and was destitute at the time of his death in 1898. Although most commentators have accepted the court´s view that the claimant was Orton, some analysts believe that an element of doubt remains as to his true identity and that, conceivably, he was Roger Tichborne. Or not.
ellauri146.html on line 782: Away but the weather turned around. And the true Pois mutta säätila kääntyi ympäri. Ja tosi
ellauri147.html on line 604: Winnicott is best known for his ideas on the true self and false self, the "good enough" parent, and "borrowed" from his second wife, Clare Winnicott, arguably his chief professional collaborator, the notion of the transitional object. He wrote several books, including Playing and Reality, and over 200 papers.
ellauri147.html on line 610: His theories of the true/false self may have been over-influenced by his own childhood experience of caring for a depressed mother, which resulted in the development of a prematurely mature self which he was only subversively able to undo.
ellauri150.html on line 467: Sheik Ilderim bribes Pontius Pilate into allowing Ben-Hur to compete in a horse and carriage race (ravit) by proposing a high wager. Esther tries to convince Messiah not to race Ben-Hur, but he is adamant that he will win. On the day of the race, Ben-Hur follows Ilderim's instructions to hold back from the race until the final laps. Using dirty tactics, Messiah manages to knock out the other competing charioteers. Following a brutal and grueling race, Ben-Hur wins the race. Messiah survives but is badly wounded and loses a leg. Ben-Hur's victory emboldens the Jewish spectators and yields dividends for Ilderim.
ellauri150.html on line 647: ... And it's time for the big setpiece, the Chariot Race! The first rule of the Chariot Race is: there are no rules. A demolition derby is entirely standard procedure. That's how Messala gets to have a chariot tricked out with blades on the wheels-- vroom! But does that shake Ben-Hur? No! He will have his vengeance. As the race starts, the two of them are neck-and-neck. Messala tries to destroy Ben-Hur's chariot, but in a cruel twist, his own chariot falls apart. Messala is dragged by his horses and viciously trampled by another team. As Messala's broken body is carried to the surgeon, Ben-Hur receives the victor's laurel crown.
ellauri150.html on line 693: The Pope reminds us that the Church teaches that we all have "freedom of choice" (free will); that our lives are not pre-determined. So in a real sense we have the power to choose our destinies - to choose between right and wrong. And this is because we are made in the image of God and as such we are able to determine "what is true and good".
ellauri150.html on line 738: I think it is more of a Protestant attribute than a Catholic one to interpret the Bible literally. Catholics have a more complex and mystical interpretation of the Bible. Take for example the Assumption of Mary as well as the Immaculate Conception. These are not tied into physical phenomenon, but are purely spiritual and can only be understood by faith. This is also true of substantiation and the Holy Trinity. Like the universe itself, these are mysteries that the human mind cannot comprehend. (I just checked the Catechism. The section on creation, 337-349, does not give a strict literal interpretation of the six days.)
ellauri151.html on line 135: I call a pederast the man who, as the word indicates, falls in love with young boys. I call a sodomite ("The word is sodomite, sir," said Verlaine to the judge who asked him if it were true that he was a sodomist) the man whose desire is addressed to mature men. […] The pederasts, of whom I am one (why cannot I say this quite simply, without your immediately claiming to see a brag in my confession?), are much rarer, and the sodomites much more numerous, than I first thought. […] That such loves can spring up, that such relationships can be formed, it is not enough for me to say that this is natural; I maintain that it is good; each of the two finds exaltation, protection, a challenge in them; and I wonder whether it is for the youth or the elder man that they are more profitable.
ellauri151.html on line 415: Self knowledge begins with the neighbor, the mirror, and just the same with true self-love; that goes from the mirror to the matter.
ellauri151.html on line 717: the Gospels contain no Christianity. This may be shocking but it is true. Not one word of Christianity exists in the Gospels. The Gospels are all Jewish. They contain only Judaism–Jewish theology.
ellauri152.html on line 553: Haman was also an astrologer, and when he was about to fix the time for the genocide of the Jews he first cast lots to ascertain which was the most auspicious day of the week for that purpose. Each day, however, proved to be under some influence favorable to the Jews. He then sought to fix the month, but found that the same was true of each month; thus, Nisan was favorable to the Jews because of the Passover sacrifice; Iyyar, because of the small Passover. But when he arrived at Adar he found that its zodiacal sign was Pisces, and he said, "Now I shall be able to swallow them as fish which swallow one another" (Esther Rabbah 7; Targum Sheni 3).
ellauri152.html on line 702: Reb Nathan explains that there is no contradiction. Contrary to popular opinion, true humility does not mean yielding in every situation and acting "like a doormat.' True humility is found in the ability to respond appropriately to each situation. There are situations where the proper response is to be bold, courageous, and unyielding. And there are other situations where the proper response is to be yielding, gentle, and meek. Depending on what your chances of winning are.
ellauri153.html on line 356:

  1. “God is good” is true at game history w if and only if God wins G if and only if Job wins G if and
    ellauri153.html on line 358:
  2. “God is omnipotent” is true at game history w if and only if God has a winning strategy in the justice-of-God game G. Tässähän se tapahtuu se suuri lässähdys. Muka omnipotentti jumala saa häthätää saatanasta matin loppupeleissä. Matkan varrella isokyrpäinen valas voi syödä vaikka kaikki sen nappulat paizi kurkon, joka jää viimeisenä laudalle. Aika lohduttavaa sen muulle tiimille. One can make a few clarifying remarks about the structure of the game. The form of the game is relatively simple: it’s an ordinary extended-form perfect information game. tuskinpa Jobilla oli täydellistä informaatiota pelitilanteesta tai edes pelin säännöistä, muista pelaajista puhumattakaan. Aika isoja informaatiojoukkoja oli niiden kalloissa. Sitäpaizi ei luonnossa pelaajat siirrä vuoronperään, vaan koko ajan, niinkuin differentiaalipeleissä. . The goal is here not to go deeply into technical details, but to construct an übersichtlich representation for the theological grammar of biblical stories and to highlight the uses of terms like “good” and “omnipotent” in them. The game or model can then be used as a simplified fragment that can be projected onto, contrasted with and used to interpret biblical stories. The point of this clarification is to highlight the grammar of the divine properties “good” and “omnipotent” within the logic of the struggle myth, and to get the consistency of {God is good, God is omnipotent, There is chaotic evil} as in the Book of Job. The argument needs two assumptions. First, the games between God, humans and creation are genuine dialogues. Paskanmarjat, ei nää ole edes mitään signaling gameja, puhumattakaan dialogipeleistä. Olis kannattanut lukea mun väitöskirja Dialogue Games, siinä on oikeeta sananvaihtoa. The players answer each other and thus have to take turns in making moves and participating in them. Then the game of Job and the struggle against chaos is in extended form to represent the sequence of the debate, and its resolution gives the drama of the fight against kid chaos. Second, the properties of God like “omnipotent” and “good” are defined against the background of Job’s encounter with God and the struggle against chaos. This redefinition builds on both James’ reinterpretation of the properties of God in terms of religious practices, and also of Job’s new world of faith in the encounter. Job’s encounter with God and the struggle against chaos are modelled in the game, so such properties of God as “good” and “omnipotent” are then internal to the game. Missä kohtaa Jopilla on tässä jotain pelivaraa? Montako valintaruutua Jobilla edes on: Marise-älä marise, ja Pyllistä-älä pyllistä. Siinä kaikki. Jotta jumalan tiimi voittaisi, sen pitää ensin marista ja sit pyllistää. Nain on meidankin elamassamme! Marise mitä mariset, mut muista pyllistää!
    ellauri153.html on line 388: “There is pointless evil” is true at game history w if and only if there is an evil s is at play in w, and
    ellauri153.html on line 431: Proposition: “God is good” and “God is omnipotent” are true in all histories of G.
    ellauri153.html on line 447: Thus “God is good” and “God is omnipotent” are true at all histories w of the game G.□
    ellauri153.html on line 451: We have now proven that the claims “God is pretty good” and “God is kinda omnipotent” are true in all of the
    ellauri153.html on line 461: Job is ruined. Thus “There is pointless evil” is true in w = (Question Job, disaster). By the previous
    ellauri153.html on line 462: proposition, “God is good” and “God is omnipotent” are true in w = (Question Job, disaster) as well.
    ellauri155.html on line 715: The incompatibilist maintains that if our willings and choices are themselves determined by antecedent causes then we could never choose otherwise than we do. Given the antecedent causal conditions, we must always act as we do. We cannot, therefore, be held responsible for our conduct since, on this account, we have no “genuine alternatives” or “open possibilities” available to us. Incompatibilists, as already noted, do not accept that Hume’s notion of “hypothetical liberty”, as presented in the Enquiry, can deal with this objection. It is true, of course, that hypothetical liberty leaves room for the truth of conditionals that suggest that we could have acted otherwise if we had chosen to do so. However, it still remains the case, the incompatibilist argues, that the agent could not have chosen otherwise given the actual circumstances. Responsibility, they claim, requires categorical freedom to choose otherwise in the same circumstances. Hypothetical freedom alone will not suffice. One way of expressing this point in more general terms is that the incompatibilist holds that for responsibility we need more than freedom of action, we also need freedom of will – understood as a power to choose between open alternatives. Failing this, the agent has no ultimate control over her conduct.
    ellauri155.html on line 800: The ministry of the Word thus required more than the public exposition of Scripture: it also entailed the declaration and application of God’s Word to individual women and men, girls and boys, through the sacraments, corrective discipline, catechetical instruction, household visitations, and spiritual counsel and consolation. As Calvin noted in his liturgy, ‘the office of a true and faithful minister is not only to teach the people in public, which is he appointed to do as a pastor, but also, as much as he is able, to admonish, exhort, warn, and console each person individually.
    ellauri155.html on line 810: The last sentence is rather remarkable. “Should it be his will to exercise you still further, by concealing it from you, submit to that will, that you may become the wiser than the weakness of your own understanding can ever attain to.” Calvin shows how much wisdom and comfort can be found in submitting to God’s divine will, trusting Him regardless of how much or how little of that will He has revealed to the afflicted. In so doing, he reveals to us true pastoral care in using this Biblical doctrine. Hey, just how much is it? I did not notice any quote.
    ellauri155.html on line 977: anything positively untrue, we can easily keep up this incognito, because they
    ellauri156.html on line 305: It is very clear in Samuel that the tragedies which take place in David's household are the consequence of his sin, just as Nathan indicates (12:10-12). Thus, when Amnon rapes Tamar, the sister of Absalom, it is a case of the “chickens coming home to roost.” Or is it a case of "Rooster coming into the chicks?" Note that it is at David's command or summons that Tamar is called to the palace, and then to Amnon's bedside. There is not so much as a hint that when Tamar is raped, it is all of Amnon's doing. Should this not strongly indicate that the same is true in Bathsheba's case, of which this second incident is a kind of mirror image? (Fucking crooky noses, raping and ravaging their kinky haired ladies right and left.)
    ellauri156.html on line 331: I must press the point a little further, at the risk of coming off. Of course it is wrong for David to use his power to have sex with another man's wife. But it is not right to abuse power even when sex is permissible. A husband should not abuse his power in order to have sex with his wife. And a wife should not abuse her power (of saying “No,” for example) to punish or put off her husband. (LOL! Bob, you show you true colors here!) Within marriage, sex is simply another area of serving our mate. It is not the opportunity to lord it over our mate. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Jennifer! And you girls as well!
    ellauri156.html on line 487: With all due respect, Uriah declines -- indeed Uriah refuses -- to do that which would be conduct unbefitting a soldier, let alone a war hero. I think it is important to see that there is no specific command here which Uriah refuses to disobey. To my knowledge, there is no specific law in the Law of Moses which commands a soldier to have sex with women during times of war. (This may have been true in the earlier days of Israel's history, there would not have been another generation of Israelites otherwise, since Israel was almost constantly at war with one of their neighbors.) This is the conviction of Uriah as a soldier, and he will not violate his conscience by deceiving his fellow men in tights, even when commanded to do so by the king.
    ellauri156.html on line 537: Abner was the son of the witch of En-dor in Mordor, (Pirḳe R. El. xxxiii.), and the hero par excellence in the Haggadah (Yalḳ., Jer. 285; Eccl. R. on ix. 11; Ḳid. 49b). Conscious of his extraordinary strength, he exclaimed: "If I could only catch hold of the earth, I could shake it" (Yalḳ. l.c.)—a saying which parallels the famous utterance of Archimedes, "Had I a fulcrum, I could move the world." (Dote moi pa bo kai tan gan kino.) According to the Midrash (Eccl. R. l.c.) it would have been easier to move a wall six yards thick than one of the feet of Abner, who could hold the Israelitish army between his knees, and often did. Yet when his time came [date missing], Joab smote him. But even in his dying hour, Abner seized his foe's balls like a ball of thread, threatening to crush them. Then the Israelites came and pleaded for Joab's jewels, saying: "If thou crushest them his future kids shall be orphaned, and our women and all our belongings will become a prey to the Philistines." Abner answered: "What can I do? He has extinguished my light" (has wounded me fatally). The Israelites replied: "Entrust thy cause to the true judge [God]." Then Abner released his hold upon Joab's balls and fell dead to the ground (Yalḳ. l.c.).
    ellauri156.html on line 541: It is characteristic of the rabbinical view of the Bible narratives that Abner, the warrior pure and simple, is styled "Lion King of the Law" (Yer. Peah, l.c.), and that even a specimen is given of a halakic discussion between him and Dog as to whether the law in Deut. xxiii. 3 excluded Ammonite and Moabite women from the Jewish community as well as men. Dog was of the opinion that David, being descended from the Moabitess Ruth, was not fit to wear the crown, nor even to be considered a true Israelite; while Abner maintained that the law affected only the male line of descent. When Dog's dialectics proved more than a match for those of Abner, the latter went to the prophet Samuel, who not only supported Abner in his view, but utterly refuted Dog's assertions (Midr. Sam. xxii.; Yeb. 76b et seq.).
    ellauri156.html on line 578: Fourth, "How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?" Sin snowballs. Sin has not got a snowball's chance in hell. Sin is not stagnant; it is not static. Sin grows. Look at the progression of sin in our text. David's sin starts when he ceases to act like a soldier and (what is way worse) becomes a late sleeper. David's sin grows from staying up late to adultery to murder. His sin begins very privately, but as the story progresses, more and more people become aware of it, and worse yet, more and more people become participants in it. His sin first acted out by his taking another man's wife, and then taking another man's life, and along with his life, his wife, plus the lives of a number of men who must die with him to make his death credible. David's sin blossoms so that it transforms a true and loyal friend (Uriah) to his enemy, and his enemies (the Ammonites, and his other rival Joab) into his allies.
    ellauri156.html on line 687: Why a story? Why not just let David have it head-on, with both barrels, like David did with Bathsheba? Many will point out that this is a skillfully employed tactic, which gets David to pronounce judgment on the crime before he realizes that he is the criminal. I think this is true. David is angry at this “rich man's” lack of compassion. If he could, he would have this fellow put to death (!). But as it is, justice requires a four-fold restitution. But having already committed himself in principle, Nathan can now apply the principle to David, in particular.
    ellauri156.html on line 812: That is precisely what the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ does for us. We were dead in our trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1-3). We were blinded to the immensity of our sins (2 Corinthians 4:4). The coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, His perfect life, His innocent and sacrificial death, His literal and physical resurrection are all historical events. But the gospel is also a story, a true story. When we read the New Testament Gospels, we read a story that is even more dramatic, more amazing, more disturbing than the story Nathan told David. When we see the way unbelieving men treated our Lord, we should be shocked, horrified, and angered. We should cry out, “They deserve to die!” And that they do. But the Gospel is not written only to show us their sins -- those who actually heard Jesus and cried, “Crucify Him, Crucify Him” -- it is written so that the Spirit of God can cry out in our hearts, “Thou art the man! Yo mon!” When we see the way men treated Jesus, we see the way we would treat him, if he were here. We see how we treat him today. With laughter and ridicule. And that, my friend, reveals the immensity of our sin, and the immensity of our need for repentance and forgiveness. Words, words, words. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
    ellauri158.html on line 49: Ad nauseam as well? Spinoza has little sympathy with the traditional monotheistic idea that God created the world ex nihilo. There is no true “in the beginning” style cosmogony, according to Spinoza. Se on kristityille suuri pettymys. Ne haluu alkuun ison bangin ja loppuun toisen samanlaisen. Ja koska kaikilla oli niin muu-kaa-vaa, eiköhän aloiteta koko touhu aa-lus-taa.
    ellauri158.html on line 774: P. 3. prop. 5. Res eatenus contrariae sunt naturae, hoc est, eatenus in eodem subiecto esse nequeunt, quatenus una alteram potest destruere. [in: P. 3. prop. 6., prop. 10., prop. 37., P. 4. prop. 7., prop. 30.]
    ellauri158.html on line 816: P. 3. prop. 28. Id omne, quod ad laetitiam conducere imaginamur, conamur promovere, ut fiat; quod vero eidem repugnare sive ad tristitiam conducere imaginamur, amovere vel destruere conamur. [in: P. 3. prop. 29., prop. 31. coroll., prop. 32., prop. 35., prop. 36., prop. 38., prop. 39., prop. 39. schol., prop. 50. schol., prop. 51. schol., prop. 55. schol., P. 4. prop. 19., prop. 37. schol. 2., P. 5. prop. 19.]
    ellauri158.html on line 1153: P. 5. prop. 2. Si animi commotionem seu affectum a causae externae cogitatione amoveamus et aliis iungamus cogitationibus, tum amor seu odium erga causam externam, ut et animi fluctuationes quae ex his affectibus oriuntur, destruentur. [in: P. 5. prop. 4. schol., prop. 20. schol.]
    ellauri159.html on line 605: Faith is when you trust God and His purpose in your circumstances more than they seem to warrant. As Hebrews 11:1 states, “Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see.” And remember, a true knight’s first mission and calling is to please the boss.
    ellauri159.html on line 621: Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much. So if you have not been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will trust you with true riches? And if you have not been trustworthy with someone else’s property, who will give you property of your own?
    ellauri159.html on line 650: Honest to God honor comes to a person when they serve and live only for God. Sometimes others acknowledge this honor publically, which is a perk, but this is never a true knight’s goal. A good reputation (at least among those where a good reputation is valued) is nice to have, but that’s never his goal either. Nonetheless, having a good name is “more desirable than great riches; to be esteemed is better than silver or gold” (Proverbs 22:1).
    ellauri159.html on line 682: Being truthful means being real honest with the facts, but it also means living in a way where what you know to be true influences your daily actions. A knight who has not yet fully resolved that he will speak only the truth will stumble on a lie.
    ellauri159.html on line 733: Overcoming failure means getting back up after getting knocked down. Aika lailla sama asia kuin perseverance, paizi tässä on saatu oikeasti köniin. True knights are familiar with both victory and defeat.
    ellauri159.html on line 748: While the prevailing view among anthropologists was long that hunter/gatherer tribes were very peaceful — bucolic, noble savages — many modern researchers like Wrangham, Napoleon Chagnon, and Steven Pinker convincingly argue that just the opposite is true. Amongst premodern peoples who lived in proximity to neighboring tribes, there is strong evidence that conflict was in fact continual and quite bloody. Primitive human males literally aped their ancestors — forming small gangs, competing for status, and fiercely maintaining boundaries. In the few tribes that did allow women to take part in raiding parties, just like as with the chimpanzees, typically only one or two childless women would choose to come along.
    ellauri159.html on line 881: She´d left me for another, it´s a common tale but true.
    ellauri159.html on line 1061: Enjoy reading and writing about history or biography! You are less likely to gravitate toward business or technical writing. If you do write about technology, they’re likely to prefer the tried-and-true to the cutting edge. When writing fiction, you can often be quite funny in conveying your observations about the foibles of human nature.
    ellauri159.html on line 1224: You make the mistake to write in purely abstract terms. That just won´t do these days. You must communicate values and personal television through your writing. Nobody is interesting in abstractions. They search for the meaning behind the facts, and so consider the facts themselves to be of marginal importance. This is true; however, throw in some facts to dazzle your readers, like Bob Heinlein. During revision, add concrete details like the size of Peewee´s bra. Appeal to the five senses. Include Peeweeś vital statistics. Incorporate other points of view for balance. Make sure your research backs up your conclusion.
    ellauri159.html on line 1391: Temperamental Optimism and Pessimism, 33. How reconcile with life one bent on suicide? 38. Religious melancholy and its cure, 39. Decay of Natural Theology, 43. Instinctive antidotes to pessimism, 46. Religion involves belief in an unseen extension of the world, 51. Scientific positivism, 52. Doubt actuates conduct as much as belief does, 54. To deny certain faiths is logically absurd, for they make their objects true, 56. Conclusion, 6l.
    ellauri160.html on line 160: In The Cantos, Possum is T. S. Eliot: "but the lot of 'em, Yeats, Possum and Wyndham / had no ground beneath 'em." In the New Age office in 1918, he also met C. H. Douglas, a British engineer who was developing his economic theory of social credit, which Pound found attractive. Douglas reportedly believed that Jews were a problem and needed to abandon a Messianic view of themselves as the "dominating race". According to Colin Holmes, the New Age itself published antisemitic material. It was within this environment, not in Italy, according to Tim Redman, that Pound first encountered antisemitic ideas about "usury". In Douglas's program," Pound had found his true muse: a blend of folkloric Celtic twilight with a paranoid hatred of the money economy and a dire suspicion about an ancient tent people's faith."
    ellauri161.html on line 560: Haha, yeah, he is—and amen to that. This is the truest, most on-point movie I saw in 2021. McKay gets sinister in Don’t Look Up, and I, for one, am glad somebody is being appropriately nasty in pointing out how absolutely moronic humans have become in the new millennium. Sorry, folks: We are fucking up big time; McKay knows it; and he’s pulling no punches.
    ellauri161.html on line 572: Pressed together, however, the mix just doesn’t work. Too many characters, such as Jonah Hill’s presidential aide, know they’re in a comedy and play for laughs accordingly. There’s way too much going on in Don’t Look Up, so the story focus is constantly diffused as we jump from one narrative thread to another. Consequently the soiree packs very little punch; as a satire on corporate greed, media ethics and celebrity culture it’s pretty limp. All bite but no teeth, you could say. (Fuck yourself droopy-lip, this is a tableau true to life, not a sketch.)
    ellauri161.html on line 599: The satire not only lacks subtlety, it pushes the bounds of ridiculousness to levels where it works neither as a comedy nor as social commentary. It is too true for laughs.
    ellauri161.html on line 769: Big let down. The humor is so off-putting it doesn´t pull laughs, while the drama is hard to dive into whilst characters scream at the camera. The portrayal is so unrealistic, so cringe, so superficial that none of the characters are true heroes. They all appear as delusional, distracted ego maniacs detached from reality. The end is anti-climactic leaving the viewer with gratitude it looks nothing like the world we actually live in. (True, being 22400 years away. But I bet the immigrant will soon reduce brontauks to extinction.)
    ellauri161.html on line 984: Siis varsin keskinkertainen kaveri. Sitten se tapaa ton Barbapapan, joka käännyttää sen takaisin äitikirkkoveneeseen. En décembre 1868, il fait la connaissance de Jules Barbey d´Aurevilly, qui habite en face de chez lui, rue Rousselet (Léon Bloy habite au numéro 24h). C´est l´occasion pour lui d´une profonde conversion intellectuelle, qui le ramène à la religion catholique, et le rapproche des courants traditionalistes. C´est Barbey qui le familiarise avec la pensée du philosophe Antoine Blanc de Saint-Bonnet, « une des majestés intellectuelles de ce siècle », dira Bloy plus tard. Par la suite, Ernest Hello eut également une très forte influence sur lui ; il semble même que ce soit lui qui l´ait incité à écrire.
    ellauri161.html on line 1100: The chief of his mystical writings are, The Ornament of Spiritual Marriage (Lat. by Gerh. Groot, Ornatus Spiritualis Desponsionis, MS. at Strasburg; by another translator, and published by Faber Stapulensis [Paris, 1512], De Ornatu Spirit. Nuptiarum, etc.; also in French, Toulouse, 1619; and in Flemish, ´J Cieraet der gheestclyeke Bruyloft, Brussels, 1624, Hengelliset häät): — Speculum AEternae Salutis: — De Calculo, an interpretation of the calculus candidus, Re 2:17: — Samuel, sive de Alta Contemplatione. The other works of Ruysbroeck contain but little more than repetitions of the thoughts expressed in those here mentioned. (Esim. 7 hengellisen rakkauden askelmasta.) He wrote in his native language, and rendered to that dialect the same service which accrued to the High German from its use by the mystics of the section where it prevailed. He is still regarded in Holland as "the best prose writer of the Netherlands in the Middle Ages." His style is characterized by great precision of statement, which becomes impaired, however, whenever his imagination soars, as it often does, to transcendental regions too sublimated for language to describe. His works were accessible until lately only in Latin editions (by Surius, Cologne, 1549, 1552, 1609 [the best], 1692, fol.), or in manuscripts scattered through different libraries in Belgium and Holland. Four of the more important works were published in their original tongue, with prefaces by Ullmann (Hanover, 1848). No complete edition has as yet been undertaken (see Moll, )e Boekerij van het S. Barbara-Klooster te Delft [Amst. 1857, 4to], p. 41).
    ellauri161.html on line 1104: Ruysbroeck was constantly desirous of preserving the distinction between the uncreated and created spirits. In the unifying of the soul with God he does not assert an identification of personality, but merely a cessation of the difference in thought and desire, and a giving up of the independence of the creature. His language was often so strong, however, and his thought often so sublimated, that more cautious thinkers found serious cause to charge his writings with pantheism. This was true of Gerson (Opp. vol. 1, pt. 1, p. 59 sq.).
    ellauri162.html on line 264: Marcel Aymé, né le 29 mars 1902 à Joigny et mort le 14 octobre 1967 chez lui, rue Norvins dans le 18e arrondissement de Paris, est un écrivain, dramaturge, nouvelliste, scénariste et essayiste français. Écrivain prolifique, il a laissé deux essais, dix-sept romans, plusieurs dizaines de nouvelles, une dizaine de pièces de théâtre, plus de cent soixante articles et des contes. Avec ces écrits il fournit une « étude sociale », avec un vocabulaire précis pour chaque type humain. Son langage mêle les différents registres : argot, patois régional franc-comtois, soutenu et anglais phonétiquement francisé. Très attaqué par la critique, y compris pour ses textes les plus inoffensifs comme Les Contes du chat perché4, il doit l'essentiel de son succès au public. Il a également écrit de nombreux scénarios et traduit des auteurs américains egalement simpletons: Arthur Miller (Les Sorcières de Salem), Tennessee Williams (La Nuit de l'iguane).
    ellauri162.html on line 822: In 2010, the Christian apologetics website True Free Thinker wrote: "Scienceblogger Chad Orzel described the commentators on PZ Myers ' Scienceblogs.com site Pharyngula, and other Scienceblogs.com commentators, as 'screechy monkeys'."
    ellauri162.html on line 826: Scienceblogs appears to have a problem keeping and attracting talented writers. According to PZ Myers, Scienceblogs has "been facing a steady erosion of talent". In 2010, the Christian apologetic website True Free Thinker wrote a quite pointed and accurate criticism of PZ Myers Pharyngula blog indicating that PZ Myers' blog posts often lack substance. Pharyngula is widely acclaimed in the liberal media due to its embrace of evolutionary pseudoscience which liberals irrationally embrace (see: Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality). Myers' blog is also listed by the science journal Nature, which also embraces evolutionary pseudoscience, as the best blog by a scientist. Pharyngula is known for its sarcastic and often specious criticism of creation science and intelligent design theory, as well as regular postings of photos of cephalopods (often with vulgarly sexual connotations both subtle and blatant). As Singer said, sexual organs are the best indicators of the soul.
    ellauri163.html on line 724: As PZ himself said: "I took the test and scored a 24, an “average math contest winner.” You need a 32 to suggest Asperger’s, and a 15 is the average. So there. I don’t have Asperger’s, I’m just cruel and insensitive."
    ellauri164.html on line 56: L'Otage est une pièce de théâtre en trois actes de Paul Claudel parue en 1911, première pièce de La Trilogie des Coûfontaine.
    ellauri164.html on line 510: Finally, it is interesting to note that, even though Moses never set foot in the Promised Land during his lifetime, he was given an opportunity to enter the Promised Land after his death. On the mount of transfiguration, when Jesus gave His disciples a taste of His full glory, He was accompanied by two Old Testament figures, Moses and Elijah, who represented the Law and the Prophets. Moses is, this day, experiencing the true Sabbath rest in Christ that one day all Christians will share (Hebrews 4:9).
    ellauri164.html on line 552: Two lessons: 1. The failings of good men may be culpable in God's sight and displeasing to him out of all proportion to the degree of blameworthiness they present to our eye. So far is it from being true (as many seem to think) that believers' sins are no sins at all, and need give no concern, that, on the contrary, the Lord dislikes the stain of sin most when it is seen in his dear children. The case of Moses is not singular. Sins which the Lord overlooks in other men he will occasionally put some mark of special displeasure upon, when they are committed by one who is eminent for holiness and honourable service. It is, no doubt, a just instinct which leads all right-thinking people to be blind to the failings of good men who have been signally useful in their day. But if the good men become indulgent to their own faults they are likely to be rudely awakened to a sense of their error. The better a man is, his sins may be the more dishonouring to God. A spot hardly visible on the coat of a labouring man, may be glaringly offensive on the shining raiment of a throned king.
    ellauri164.html on line 727: Moses assembled the people, but he didn't follow orders quite the way he should have. Instead of just speaking to the rock, which would have demonstrated the power of the word over the power of his rod, he struck it twice, saying, "Listen, you rebels, shall we get water for you out of this rock?" It almost sounded as though Moses was taking credit for delivering the water. That was not true. Perhaps the strain of leading the people all those years was finally starting to show. He called them rebels, which in a sense they were. But God did not tell him to do this. Nor was there any mention of God at that point. All seemed directed at Moses and Aaron: "Must we bring water out of this rock?" Depending on how it's read, it could indicate doubt on the part of Moses.
    ellauri164.html on line 826: All this is true even though the water was brought forth by a leader’s error. God’s grace does not depend upon the perfection of the leader. Not even Christ.x
    ellauri164.html on line 890: Many brethren and sisters, not to mention those outside the church, have a wrong understanding of what the sin of Moses was and its implication(s). Often when asked or giving comments on the matter, they say that his sin was in smiting the rock twice instead of once. They think that, since at first God told Moses to take the rod and smite the rock, and the next time He also told him to take the rod, therefore, he was also instructed to strike once. Such an understanding erodes the whole essence that God had designed in the type that would later be seen in the antitype. As it will soon be clear, striking the rock even once [that second time] would have been sin on the part of Moses. In view of this, therefore, it is important for us to possess the true facts on this matter.
    ellauri164.html on line 918: May the Lord help us not only to understand this truth about Moses’ sin alone, but also possess the true facts of the Bible in every aspect, which comes as a result of prayerful study of His Word, remains my wish and prayer. AMEN.
    ellauri164.html on line 955: Everyone knows how Romeo and Juliet ends, and yet we still cry when they die. The same is true of the first of the two Torah portions we read this week, Parashat Hukkat/Balak. In this portion, we learn that Moses will not enter the Promised Land. We have heard or read this story every year, and yet we are still upset, still angry that, on the threshold, Moses is denied admission to the Land to which he has been leading the Israelites for forty years.
    ellauri171.html on line 572: Cursed be their anger, for it is fierce,and their wrath, for it is cruel!
    ellauri171.html on line 757: There is something particularly cruel about this slaughter of the innocents. It was done by people the boys had grown to trust, but who now hunted them down and killed them violently.
    ellauri171.html on line 772: The lesson: God always wins. That's a pretty simplistic way of saying it, but it's true nonetheless. Even when people like Athaliah try to stomp out an entire family and put an end to God's plan for redemption, when people like the priests of Baal lead others to worship idols instead of the true God, God will always triumph in the end. The negative forces of our culture make us wonder where we're headed as a people. Many of our leaders show little integrity or morality, and dishonesty is overlooked in the workplace. Kindness is often the exception rather than the rule. But don't despair. This is not a battle God plans to lose. In the end, he will prevail! You just wight Enry Jiggins!
    ellauri171.html on line 978: She represents a view of womanhood that is the opposite of the one extolled in characters such as Ruth the Moabite, who is also a foreigner. Ruth surrenders her identity and submerges herself in Israelite ways; she adopts the religious and social norms of the Israelites and is praised by the tentmen for her conversion to "The" God. Jezebel steadfastly remains true to her own beliefs.
    ellauri172.html on line 38:

    Sr. Brueghel


    ellauri172.html on line 40: rueghel-palapeli.jpg" width="100%" />
    ellauri172.html on line 254: Later writers satirised this view in terms of an ass which, confronted by both food and water, must necessarily die of both hunger and thirst while pondering a decision. Some proponents of hard determinism have granted the unpleasantness of the scenario (not for the donkey, it will end up eating both), but have denied that it illustrates a true paradox, since one does not contradict oneself in suggesting that a man might die between two equally plausible routes of action. For example, in his Ethics, Benedict de Spinoza suggests that a person who dies because he can't decide is an ass, or worse.
    ellauri172.html on line 666: Le major Ydow tomba dans une de ces rages qui déshonorent le caractère d’un homme, et cribla la Pudica d’injures ignobles, d’injures de cocher. Je crus qu’il la rouerait de coups. Les coups allaient venir, mais un peu plus tard. Il lui reprocha, — en quels termes ! d’être… tout ce qu’elle était. Il fut brutal, abject, révoltant ; et elle, à toute cette fureur, répondit en vraie femme qui n’a plus rien à ménager, qui connaît jusqu’à l’axe l’homme à qui elle s’est accouplée, et qui sait que la bataille éternelle est au fond de cette bauge de la vie à deux. Elle fut moins ignoble, mais plus atroce, plus insultante et plus cruelle dans sa froideur, que lui dans sa colère. Elle fut insolente, ironique, riant du rire hystérique de la haine dans son paroxysme le plus aigu, et répondant au torrent d’injures que le major lui vomissait à la face par de ces mots comme les femmes en trouvent, quand elles veulent nous rendre fous, et qui tombent sur nos violences et dans nos soulèvements comme des grenades à feu dans de la poudre. De tous ces mots outrageants à froid qu’elle aiguisait, celui avec lequel elle le dardait le plus, c’est qu’elle ne l’aimait pas — qu’elle ne l’avait jamais aimé : « Jamais ! jamais ! jamais ! » répétait-elle, avec une furie joyeuse, comme si elle lui eût dansé des entrechats sur le cœur ! — Or, cette idée — qu’elle ne l’avait jamais aimé — était ce qu’il y avait de plus féroce, de plus affolant pour ce fat heureux, pour cet homme dont la beauté avait fait ravage, et qui, derrière son amour pour elle, avait encore sa vanité ! Aussi arriva-t-il une minute où, n’y tenant plus, sous le dard de ce mot, impitoyablement répété, qu’elle ne l’avait jamais aimé, et qu’il ne voulait pas croire, et qu’il repoussait toujours :
    ellauri172.html on line 692: Satan me donna la force d’enfoncer la porte du placard ou j'etsis cache et je vis… ce que je ne reverrai jamais ! La Pudica, terrassée, était tombée sur la table où elle avait écrit, et le major l’y retenait d’un poignet de fer, tous voiles relevés, son beau corps à nu, tordu, comme un serpent coupé, sous son étreinte. Mais que croyez-vous qu’il faisait de son autre main, Messieurs ?… Cette table à écrire, la bougie allumée, la cire à côté, toutes ces circonstances avaient donné au major une idée infernale, — l’idée de cacheter cette femme, comme elle avait cacheté sa lettre — et il était dans l’acharnement de ce monstrueux cachetage, de cette effroyable vengeance d’amant perversement jaloux !
    ellauri172.html on line 846: La Grenadière, nouvelle d'Honoré de Balzac, parue en 1832 : le vicaire de Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire.
    ellauri180.html on line 189: There are many other reasons why circumcision may have evolved. Some have suggested that it is a mark of cultural identity, akin to a tattoo or a body piercing. Alternatively, there are reasons to believe that the ritual evolved as a fertility rite. For example, that some tribal cultures apportion seasons' for both the male and female operation, supports the view that circumcision developed as a sacrifice to the gods, an offering in exchange for a good harvest, etc. This would seem reasonable as the penis is clearly inhabited by powers that produce life. Indeed, evidence of a connection with darvests is also found in Nicaragua, where blood from the operations is mixed with maize to be eaten during the ceremony. (Fig. 3). Although the true origins of circumcision will never be known, it is likely that the truth lies in part with all of the theories described.
    ellauri180.html on line 369: Bobby finally learns about the true nature of Travelers: that he and the others are not actually humans at all, but rather, human-shaped AI silicon dolls created by something called Sonera: the accumulated energy of all positive optimist sentient knowledge and creativity. Contrarily, Great Dane is a rear window dog arisen from Elisa, a dark antithesis of Sonera. Reuniting one last time, Bobby and the Travelers confront Great Dane in a final battle on Third World to begin Hello World's process toward economic liberalism at last.
    ellauri181.html on line 156: Description: Six main features, relevant to all values, are described first. This is followed by an outline of ten basic personal values, with a guide to which are congruent and which conflict. These six features are relevant to all values.
    ellauri181.html on line 208: Relations among these 10 broad personal values are dynamic. Actions pursuing one value “have consequences that conflict with some values but are congruent with others.” This has “practical, psychological, and social consequences.” “Of course, people can and do pursue competing values, but not in a single act. Rather, they do so through different acz, at different times, and in different settings.”
    ellauri181.html on line 210: The figure below provides a quick guide to values that conflict and those that are congruent. There are two bipolar dimensions. One “contrasz ‘openness to change’ and ‘conservation’ values. This dimension captures the conflict between values that emphasize independence of thought, action, and feelings and readiness for change (self-direction, stimulation) and values that emphasize order, self-restriction, preservation of the past, and resistance to change (security, conformity, tradition).”
    ellauri181.html on line 599: Franklin thought about the advice of his friend and true to the recommendation added a thirteenth virtue.
    ellauri181.html on line 603: Franklin then went on to define humility for his own understanding, and true to his less than humble self Ben Franklin defined humility, thus.
    ellauri181.html on line 607: Now there is a truly humble man. He would just emulate Christ and Socrates in all things. True humility. Well, perhaps not really!
    ellauri181.html on line 608: Not very humble; but true to his word and his intention, Franklin set about to reorder his life. Each day he would read his list and each week he would focus on a different aspect of his list repeating the process over and over and over again.
    ellauri182.html on line 82: Mikage is not religious, but believes in elements of the mystical and superstitious. She “can’t believe in the gods,” but for a warm bed, she “thanked the gods—whether they existed or not.” In despair, she “implored the gods: Please, let me live.” She also has a dream that comes partially true. Ergo Mikage relates to American culture. She looks up to Eriko as an ideal of feminine beauty, charm, and strength, although Eriko was once, or still is, a man - or is s/he?
    ellauri182.html on line 166: Jōdo Shinshū (浄土真宗, "Puhdas maa tosi oppi"), also known as Shin Buddhism or True Pure Land Buddhism, is a school of Pure Land Buddhism. It was founded by the former Tendai Japanese monk Shinran.
    ellauri182.html on line 167: Shinran left Mount Hiei to study under Hōnen for the next six years. Hōnen (1133–1212) another ex-Tendai monk, left the tradition in 1175 to found his own sect, the Jōdo-shū or "Pure Land School". From that time on, Shinran considered himself, even after exile, a devout disciple of Hōnen rather than a founder establishing his own, distinct True Pure Land school.
    ellauri183.html on line 94: However, in a letter to his daughter a week after that dinner of reconciliation, Malamud voiced his true feelings: Roth, he said, had written a “foolish egoistic essay about my work” and had “certainly misinterpreted” “The Assistant.” The letter was not made public until 2006, some 20 years after Malamud’s death.
    ellauri184.html on line 528: Classical, Hellenistic, and Roman culture found circumcision to be cruel and repulsive. In the Roman Empire, circumcision was regarded as a barbaric and disgusting custom. The consul Titus Flavius Clemens was condemned to death by the Roman Senate in 95 CE for, according to the Talmud, circumcising himself and converting to Judaism. The Emperor Hadrian (117–138) forbade circumcision. Overall, the rite of circumcision was especially execrable in Classical civilization, also because it was the custom to spend an hour a day or so exercising nude in the gymnasium and in Roman baths, therefore Jewish men did not want to be seen in public deprived of their foreskins.
    ellauri185.html on line 838: In the Western world some Anabaptist groups are highly inbred because they originate from small founder populations and until today marriage outside the groups is not allowed for members. Especially the Reidenbach Old Order Mennonites and the Hutterites stem from very small founder populations. The same is true for some Hasidic and Haredi Jewish groups.
    ellauri188.html on line 122: I have just returned from a seven months' trip to the Marquesas, and while the situation, due to the de- grading influences of so-called civilization by the whites, is serious enough from a humanitarian stand- point, I can hardly share, to its fullest extent, Mr. Wester's rather doleful outlook, either as regards the complete extinction of the true Marquesan or the ex tinetion of the breadfruit resulting from the disap pearance of the full-blooded native.
    ellauri188.html on line 424: In 2011, Lucas co-starred with Elizabeth Taylor in the film Red Dog, based on the true story of an Australian kelpie. Lucas won an Inside Animal Award for his role as the dog. For this part, he gainede more than 100 lbs in weight.
    ellauri189.html on line 89: to them, they turned (in 1648) against their former rulers. The vicissitudes of a series of risings, during which both sides committed unspeakable cruelties, were often shown in the “frenetic” tales and dramas of the younger contemporaries
    ellauri189.html on line 596: If one analyses the characters of the protagonists, however, one realises that Panahi is merely reinforcing ingrained, religiously patriarchal prejudices against women, who are consistently portrayed as weak, hysterical, cruel, illogical, too emotional and treacherous.
    ellauri189.html on line 724: The Pashtuns, who live in Afghanistan, Pakistan and India, have a very special tradition, which says they are Bene Israel, and is widely spread among some of the Pashtun tribes. In this article we intend to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that this tradition is true, and they are in fact the descendants of the 10 tribes of Israel, who were taken to Afghanistan thousands of years ago.
    ellauri189.html on line 728: Some Pashtuns, especially from young generations, are doubting that this is true. In this article I’ll explore the possibilities of how this tradition could have originated. From this exploration it will become clear that doubting the truthfulness of this tradition is irrational. I would also outline some common traditions of Pashtuns and Jews, some of them are based on the Torah, which further confirm that this tradition is true and that Pashtuns are really Bene Israel. I’ll then say a few words about DNA testing and finally talk about the implications of this tradition.
    ellauri189.html on line 732: There are 2 possibilities for how this tradition could have originated. The simple one is that it is true. The more complex one is that it is false. If it is false, it had to originate somehow. So maybe
    ellauri189.html on line 736: According to this explanation for the origin of this tradition, at some generation A, some Pashtuns decided they are Bene Israel. Then they convinced or forced the other Pashtuns, although no one has ever heard of it before. Time had passed, and at generation B the tradition was already so acceptable, that not only many (probably most) of the Pashtuns believed it, but they completely forgot that once, at generation A, some Pashtuns invented it and convinced or forced others it is true. Very like the way some zealot Jews in generation A convinced others that their windy god was the only one. But this is irrational.
    ellauri189.html on line 740: We previously outlined taxonomy of all the possible explanations for the origin of the tradition that Pashtuns are Bene Israel, assuming it is false. Because all of the explanations are irrational, we must conclude that the tradition is true, and at some generation A the Pashtuns really lived in the land of Israel and knew for a fact they are Bene Israel. They were then taken to Afghanistan and the area around it (according to the bible, they were taken by the Assyrians), where they lived and passed this tradition from generation to generation.
    ellauri189.html on line 791: It is true that the Pashtuns do not speak Hebrew, but I think it is highly probable that Pashto is the Yidish of Pashtuns. It is also possible that Pashtuns didn’t need another foreign language (like Jews needed to know German or Spanish) because unlike Jews, Pashtuns had their own territory. It might be just a wild theory, but it might have been used, like Yidish, so that Pashtuns won’t mix with other nations.
    ellauri189.html on line 801: The faces of all the people who claim they are Bene Israel prove they mixed, and they generally do not deny that they mixed. Jews mixed too, but they kept Judaism, so they fall in to the first category (Jews who married non-Jews were thrown out of the Jewish community and were considered dead to them. This is still true for today’s religious Jews, and until not long ago, all Jews were religious). On the other hand, those other people who both mixed and did not keep Judaism, although they are descendants of Bene Israel to some extent, they are not Bene Israel themselves, as they do not fall into either category.
    ellauri189.html on line 835: Second, if a non-Israeli marries an Israeli woman, they are not really married according to Halacha (Jewish law), but if he is Israeli from the 10 tribes, then they are really married and she must get divorced according to Halacha if she wants to marry an Israeli. On this topic, the Talmud says in Yevamot 16: “If a non-Jew married an Israeli woman according to Halacha, we are concerned that they might actually be married, because he might be from the 10 tribes”. The Talmud then asks: “But when someone is in front of us and we don’t know who he is, we assume he came from the majority of people, and the majority of people are not from the 10 tribes, so we shouldn’t be concerned”. The Talmud then says that this is only true in their land – the land where the 10 tribes live, because over there they are the majority. So the Talmud believes that the 10 tribes are still the majority in their land. If they had mixed this would not have been the case, unless there was only a little mixing going on.
    ellauri190.html on line 275: In 1648, a Kozak leader called Zinoviy Bohdan Khmelnytsky (Polish transliteration, Chmielnicki) started a war on the Polish crown. Initially, it was his own personal vendetta on a Polish landlord who stole his land, but very soon it grew into a colossal uprising of the Kozaks and Ukrainian peasants against their Polish landlords. The people fought (the way they knew how) against the feudal oppression, as well as against forced Catholicization and Polonization of Ukraine. Unfortunately, it turned into a fratricide. (Sorry Poles, of course we are on the same side now.) The main adversary of Khmelnytsky was Prince Yarema (Jeremiah) Korybut-Vyshnevetsky, a Rusyn-Ukrainian, a noble valiant knight and a great statesman who, nonetheless, kept his allegiance to the Polish king (whom he personally hated, but could not break his knight’s oath of loyalty). Both sides resorted to unspeakable cruelties. Most tragically, Khmelnysky, a brave warrior as he was, turned out to be a horribly short-sighted politician. In January 1654, he essentially surrendered Ukraine to Muscovy, approving what he thought was a temporary military union against the Republic but turned out to be the beginning of the “Russian” (actually Muscovite) occupation of Ukraine. It just goes to show: give a pinky finger to the Russkies and they take the whole hand.
    ellauri191.html on line 146: "in recognition of the fresh originality and true inspiration of his poetic production, which faithfully reflects the natural scenery and native spirit of his people, and, in addition, his significant work as a Provençal philologist"
    ellauri191.html on line 178: "in recognition of the fresh originality and true inspiration of his poetic production, which faithfully reflects the natural scenery and native spirit of his people, and, in addition, his significant work as a Provençal philologist"
    ellauri191.html on line 445: "in recognition of his brilliant literary achievements, characterized as they are by a nobility of style, a profound human sympathy, grace, and a true Gallic temperament"
    ellauri191.html on line 899: "for the artistic vigour and true independence of mind with which he endeavours in his poetry to find answers to the eternal questions confronting mankind"
    ellauri192.html on line 633: It’s interesting that the church was praying earnestly, yet they did not believe the answer to their prayers when it came. They forgot an important part of prayer, which is answering the door. Rhoda was the first one to know of Peter’s deliverance, and she carried the joyful message to others. She did not let their doubts stop her from sharing what she knew was true: God had done the impossible. Even in the face of their unbelief, she was unrelenting in her joy. Believers today can take a cue from Rhoda and share the news of what God accomplishes with those around us, remaining joyful in what we know is true.
    ellauri196.html on line 33:

    Sr. Brueghel


    ellauri196.html on line 36:
    Pieter Brueghel, The Fall of Icarus (bottom right)

    ellauri196.html on line 231: Musee des Beaux arts on hyvä myös. Ihan parhautta siinä on kyllä Brueghelin (tai jonkun muun) taulu (yllä).
    ellauri196.html on line 251: In Breughel's Icarus, for instance: how everything turns away Ota Brueghelin Ikarus vaikka: että kaikki kääntyy
    ellauri196.html on line 265: According to Brueghel Brueghelin mukaan
    ellauri196.html on line 841: The academicians of Stockholm have often (though not always) said no to intolerance, cruel fanaticism and that persecuting spirit which turns the strong against the weak, oppressors against the oppressed, rather than the other way round. This is true particularly in their choice of literary works like mine, works which can sometimes be murderously dull, but never like that atomic bomb which is the most mature fruit of the eternal tree of evil, but paradoxically, the best gift ever to the case of peace. It kept Europeans from murdering each other for almost 100 years.
    ellauri196.html on line 851: So-called lyrics is at work, self-proclaimed poets like Bob Dylan fall into step with new times. Poetry becomes acoustic guitar and visual effects again, as it was in the times of Erato. The words splash in all directions, like the explosion of dynamite, there is no true meaning, but a verbal earthquake with many epicenters. Decipherment is not necessary, in many cases the aid of the psychoanalyst may help.
    ellauri197.html on line 335: The poem, ‘Love’s Organ's Growth’, is an admirable lyric in which Donne examines the true nature of love and finds that it is mixed stuff, a mixture of both physical and spiritual elements. True love is both of the body and the mind, and to prove his point Donne gives a number of arguments and brings together a number of most disparate and varied elements.
    ellauri198.html on line 116: Amerikka oli ällö paikka jo kun oltiin nuaaria. A great place for hamburgers but who'd wanna live there. Sarjasta True Detective tulee ilkeitä 80-luvun takautumia. Eise ollutkaan kuvattu Arkansoossa vaan Luisiaanassa. Häirizeviä matkijalintuja karkotettiin kotipesiltä haukkojen ja pöllöjen avulla, ei sentään kaadettu kannanhoidon nimissä kuin Audubonin lintuja tai työläisiä Republican Steelin pihalla.
    ellauri198.html on line 258: Vanity Fairin juonipaljastuxessa luvataan kertoa kaikki mitä haluut tietää True Detective English major alluusioista, and more.
    ellauri198.html on line 269: Carmen Ejogo’s Amelia Reardon is an English teacher (and, later, a renowned author) which gives True Detective an excuse to drop some lovely poetic voice-over to the first episode, when she reads out two Robert Penn Warren poems. The first is titled “Tell Me a Story” (already read).
    ellauri198.html on line 294: But of course, the Warren lines that stick out the most in the context of this episode is this: “In this century, and moment, of mania / Tell me a story.” On the one hand, this “century of mania” could refer to any modern hundred-year range we chose. So this HBO series itself is a story told in a century of mania. But if some of the implications of the post-murder turmoil that might over-take this town come true, then the case of the missing Purcell kids is, specifically, the story of a moment of mania known as “Satanic Panic,” which swept the nation in the 1980s and early 90s.
    ellauri198.html on line 712: Bill Sheehan of The Washington Post called the series "a humane, visionary epic and a true magnum opus" that stands as an "imposing example of pure storytelling," "filled with brilliantly rendered set pieces... cataclysmic encounters and moments of desolating tragedy." Erica Noonan of the Boston Globe said, "There's a fascinating world to be discovered in the series" but noted that its epic nature keeps it from being user-friendly.
    ellauri198.html on line 726: They discover King about to be hit by a van. Jake pushes King out of the way but Jake is killed in the process. Roland, heartbroken with the loss of the person he considers his true son, buries Jake and returns with Oy to Susannah in Fedic, via the Dixie Pig. They are chased through the depths of Castle Discordia by an otherworldly monster, then depart and travel for weeks across freezing badlands toward the Tower.
    ellauri198.html on line 889: The poem as usually printed breaks off at this point, in mid-line, with the word "celestial". Keats's friend Richard Woodhouse, transcribing this poem, completed this line as "Celestial Glory dawn'd: he was a god!" Ox, nyet! nyet! The language of Hyperion is very similar to Milton's, in metre and style. However, his characters are quite different. Although Apollo falls into the image of the "Son" from Paradise Lost and of "Jesus" from Paradise Regained, he does not directly confront Hyperion as Satan is confronted. Also, the roles are reversed, and Apollo is deemed as the "challenger" to the throne, who wins it by being more "true" and thus, more "beautiful." Double yawn.
    ellauri203.html on line 225: Appolinaria Suslova was perhaps the woman who hurt Dostoevsky most. According to Slonim: “He winced while calling her name, he was in communication with her while married; he always depicted her in his novels. Until his death he remembered her caress and slaps in the face. He was devoted to this seductive, cruel, unfaithful and tragic love.”
    ellauri203.html on line 450: credulity and the same cruelty, the same lust of blood, of gold, of
    ellauri203.html on line 458: cruel: 'None doth offend,' which in other words means: 'None is without
    ellauri204.html on line 704: Antoine Marie Joseph Paul Artaud, better known as Antonin Artaud, was a French writer, poet, dramatist, visual artist, essayist, actor and theatre director. He is widely recognized as one of the major figures of the European avant-garde. In particular, he had a profound influence on twentieth-century theatre through his conceptualization of the Theatre of Cruelty. Known for his raw, surreal and transgressive work, his texts explored themes from the cosmologies of ancient cultures, philosophy, the occult, mysticism and indigenous Mexican practices. Hirveää scheissea.
    ellauri207.html on line 95: In addition to being a milestone for the field, the publication of Dimensions in Mathematics is a true publishing event, a crowning achievement in our centennial year. We’re extremely proud to finally satisfy the millions of Millennium readers who’ve sought out the book, and are deeply humbled by the experience of working with the legendary Dr. Parnault.
    ellauri210.html on line 373: By the time Johnson arrived in Paris, Cravan had carved out a reputation as a boxer himself, a discipline he first picked up while traveling across the USA. He was also known as an ardent proponent of the “American” attitude toward life, by which he meant living according to desire and instinct, and telling so-called civilized society to take a running jump. In an essay titled “To Be or Not To Be … American,” he wrote that, thanks to the influence of cakewalk dancers, track athletes, and boxers such as Joe Jeanette, the whole of Paris had turned American. “Overnight,” Cravan said, “everyone began to spit and swear” and “floated around in clothes two sizes too big for them.” He finished the piece with a crib sheet for how to pass as American: “Chew … never speak … always look busy … and, above all else, crown yourself with arrogance.” It was advice he followed assiduously. How right, how true, to this day.
    ellauri210.html on line 782: After the war, Tanguy is sent back to Spain, Barcelona where he learns that his grandmother has recently passed away and there is no one else to take care of him. He is sent to a reformation school for juvenile delinquents and orphans, run by priests who are no less cruel and sadist than the Nazi "kapos." Bitter, Tanguy believes they are worse than the Nazis because these priests hide their sadism behind the facade of religion and confession, but that makes their sin no less. He succeeds in escaping along with a "companion," but is forced to separate from his as well. This time around, he finds himself in a school run by a group of priests but unlike the reformation school, here, Tanguy is able to grow, learn and live comfortably. It is here, that he truly flourishes and finds friends and solace. But he is still not completely at peace and sets off again in search of the parents who had abandoned and forsaken him to such a bitter destiny. He does find them eventually, but only to realise that the years of hardship and horror experienced by him have built an impenetrable barrier between them. He is no longer a left wing radical like them. He has learned not to hate the capos. Don't get mad get even. LOL.
    ellauri210.html on line 917: En 1922, il retourne à Paris et y vivote en faisant de petits métiers. Avec Yves Tanguy, il fréquente également la Maison des amis des livres, rue de l'Odéon, tenue par Adrienne Monnier, qui leur fait découvrir la littérature et des personnalités comme André Breton et Louis Aragon. Il est hébergé de 1924 à 1928 par Marcel Duhamel qui s'est installé au 54 de la rue du Château près de Montparnasse — Duhamel dirige l’hôtel Grosvenor qui appartenait à son oncle et qui est sis non loin de là.
    ellauri210.html on line 918: L'appartement de la rue du Château devient l'endroit de rencontre du mouvement symboliste et surréaliste. C'est en fait un logement collectif qui accueille tous les amis désargentés de Duhamel : Raymond Queneau, Yves Tanguy.
    ellauri210.html on line 919: Le 30 avril 1925, Prévert épouse Simone Geneviève Dienne (1903-1994), son amie d'enfance devenue violoncelliste dans un cinéma de la rue de Cluny pour accompagner les films muets. En 1928, il quitte la rue du Château et s'installe avec elle au pied de la butte Montmartre et se lance dans l'écriture — en février, il compose Les animaux ont des ennuis, son premier poème.
    ellauri210.html on line 1169: Personnalité tragique et indépendante, il abandonne la poésie au début des années 1950 pour se consacrer entièrement à la sculpture dans son atelier situé au 123, rue de Crimée à Paris, puis chez Hanesse à Pantin et, à partir de 1957, au 21, avenue du Maine, dans un atelier situé villa Marie Vassilieff (chemin du Montparnasse).
    ellauri210.html on line 1316: The narrator, randomly named André, ruminates on a number of Surrealist principles, before ultimately commencing (around a third of the way through the novel) on a narrative account, generally linear, of his brief ten-day affair with the titular character Nadja. She is so named “because in Russian it's the beginning of the word hope, and because it's only the beginning,” but her name might also evoke the Spanish "Nadie," which means "No one." The narrator becomes obsessed with this woman with whom he, upon a chance encounter while walking through the street, strikes up conversation immediately. He becomes reliant on daily rendezvous, occasionally culminating in romance (a kiss here and there). His true fascination with Nadja, however, is her vision of the world, which is often provoked through a discussion of the work of a number of Surrealist artists, including himself. While her understanding of existence subverts the rigidly authoritarian quotidian, it is later discovered that she is mad and belongs in a sanitarium. After Nadja reveals too many details of her past life, she in a sense becomes demystified, and the narrator realizes that he cannot continue their relationship.
    ellauri210.html on line 1325: Joyce Mansour y Gisèle Prassinos crean bellos monstruos. Han sustituido la belleza convencional dando prioridad a esta “laideur” que está en comunión con la crueldad y el erotismo, siempre rodeada de una pátina macabra. Las dos autoras, bajo esta categoría estética han dado paso a un viaje interior, el que proporcionan sus seres deformes, enfermos, en un ejercicio catártico. El objetivo será para las dos el mismo: exorcizar el miedo, la muerte y la angustia.
    ellauri214.html on line 551: Tokarczuk felt this rejection of facts at first-hand when the Polish publication of her 2015 novel The Books of Jacob led to death threats from nationalists. Her 900-page “magnum opus” tells the true story of 18th-century Polish-Jewish religious leader Jakub Frank, who converted thousands of Orthodox Jews to a kind of Christianity that saw them condemned and persecuted for heresy.
    ellauri216.html on line 74: Myhäilevät paxut munkit olivat sydämellinen seurue. Serafim oli webmasteri. Kokelas Pietari on todnäk. homo.
    ellauri217.html on line 83: Apostoliset isät väittivät nähneensä jonkun apostolin. Apostolisten isien kirjoitusten joukossa on lähinnä kirjoituksia, jotka tukevat pakanallisuudesta kääntyneiden kristittyjen näkemystä kristinuskosta. Sen sijaan Jerusalemin juutalaiskristittyjen edustamat näkemykset ovat käytännössä katsoen hävinneet ensimmäisten kahden vuosisadan aikana. Paavilaisen näkemyksen mukaan esimerkiksi kristittyjen ei enää tarvinnut noudattaa juutalaista lakia ja esimerkiksi ympärileikkauttaa itseään, pelkkä kaste riitti. Mieluusti uppo, mutta Jordanin ja uimahallin puutteessa käy ripsiminen partavedellä. Ei Jeesus välitä. Parta, korvakiharat, kipa ja naruessu olivat valinnaisia. Sapattina sai painaa duunia ja himoita toisten vaimoja muttei sunnuntaina. Ei hetkinen, se ei sentään tullut mukana.
    ellauri217.html on line 231: He liked things to be clean. People worship power, even its victims. True happiness can never be found until the things that lead to it are plentiful for everyone. But that´s impossible, because happiness is a differential: everyone must have more than the others and more than before. Everyone just can't have that, it's a logical contradiction.
    ellauri219.html on line 624: You're delicious and if my wishes can all come true
    ellauri219.html on line 758: Some of the schools of India say that the psychic nature is, as it were, a looking-glass, eli narsismihan siinä taas on kyseessä. Eli the purpose of life, taas kerran, is the "the undressing of the immortal man; the birth of the spiritual from the psychical, whereby we enter our divine inheritance and come to inhabit Eternity. This is, indeed, salvation, the purpose of all true religion, in all times."
    ellauri219.html on line 954: The police blanketed the 23-year-old woman and asked her questions to determine her state of mind. She was unable to answer who she was, what day it was, or what kind of moron the President of the United States was. She was able to explain that she was “bipolar,” but though she was on “prescription medication,” she was uncertain if she had been taking it recently. A neighbor gave her some clothes, and she was taken to jail on charges of open or gross lewdness. The dog meanwhile was taken stark naked into the custody of Animal Control on similar charges and executed fortwith without trial. "We had to let him go", said the sheriff ruefully.
    ellauri220.html on line 341:
    (US ) A black person. Notable for appearing in the 1979 film, The Jerk[ and the 1993 film True Romance.

    ellauri220.html on line 593: ruegel_the_Elder_-_Children%E2%80%99s_Games_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg/800px-Pieter_Bruegel_the_Elder_-_Children%E2%80%99s_Games_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg" width="80%" />
    ellauri221.html on line 93: Issue d'une famille modeste (son père Louis Betenfeld, violent et alcoolique, est ouvrier brasseur et sa mère Marie Lartisant domestique), Marthe Betenfeld a un frère et une sœur aînés, Camille et Jeanne. Elle est envoyée quelques années dans une institution catholique et son destin semble tout tracé : couturière, comme sa sœur aîné. Puis elle devient à Nancy apprentie culottière, à quatorze ans. Le métier ne l'enchantant guère, elle fugue de chez ses parents. Elle est interpellée pour racolage en mai 1905 par la Police des mœurs et ramenée chez ses parents. Elle fugue à nouveau à 16 ans et se retrouve à Nancy, ville avec une importante garnison militaire, où elle tombe amoureuse d'un Italien se disant sculpteur mais qui se révèle être un proxénète. Il l'envoie sur le trottoir, puis elle devient prostituée dans les « bordels à soldats » de Nancy. Devant effectuer plus de 50 passes par jour, elle tombe rapidement malade et contracte la syphilis. Renvoyée du bordel, dénoncée par un soldat pour lui avoir transmis la syphilis et fichée par la police (où elle est inscrite comme prostituée mineure le 21 août 1905), elle est contrainte de s'enfuir à Paris. Elle rentre dans un « établissement de bains » rue Godot-de-Mauroy (maison close d'un standing supérieur à ses anciennes maisons d'abattage) où elle rencontre, un soir de septembre 1907, Henri Richer, mandataire aux Halles. Le riche industriel l'épouse le 13 avril 1915. Elle fait alors table rase de son passé et devient une respectable bourgeoise de la Belle Époque dans son hôtel particulier de l'Odéon. Elle demande à être rayée du fichier national de la prostitution, ce qui lui est refusé.
    ellauri221.html on line 103: ruel and inhumane law. He switched immediately to drinking only Tittinger.
    ellauri222.html on line 97: “In college I behaved as though my career was to be a writer, and that guided me,” Bellow later said. There was also the fact that his principal interest was literature, and, until after the war, Jews were rarely hired by English departments. “You weren’t born to it” is the way the chairman of the department at Northwestern clarified the matter when Bellow inquired about graduate school. Leader thinks that this encounter “produced a lifelong antipathy, mild but real, to English departments.” It’s true that there was antipathy. But Bellow would have been interested in a university career only as a means to support his writing. Fiction was his calling. “He was focused, he was dedicated to becoming what he was, from the beginning,” David Peltz, Bellow’s oldest friend, told Leader. “I mean, he never veered.”
    ellauri222.html on line 177: But “Ravelstein” is a revenge novel, too. It’s not really about Ravelstein/Bloom. It’s about the narrator, a writer named Chick, who has been treated cruelly by his wife, Vela, a beautiful and brilliant physicist—a wicked caricature of Bellow’s fourth wife, the mathematician Alexandra Ionescu Tulcea. There are also a couple of drive-by take-downs along the way—of Mircea Eliade, a historian of religion at Chicago rumored to have been involved in the fascist Romanian Iron Guard, and of the owner of a restaurant on St. Martin, in the Caribbean, where Bellow contracted a case of food poisoning that nearly killed him. He brings them into the story just to skewer them.
    ellauri222.html on line 179: Podhoretz told Leader that he considered all of Bellow’s characters puppets. And there is something animatronic about them. This is especially true in “Augie March,” where the extended procession of too vivid personalities is like a Wes Anderson movie. Bellow tended to make his characters look the way a child sees grownups, unalterable cartoons, weirdly unself-conscious in their one-dimensionality.
    ellauri222.html on line 223: For a man for such small balls, he had huge needs. The writing life needed to be supported. He failed his children; he left them, and it was a wound he carried around like a medal. He knew the cruelty of this. At the very end, though he was not Rosie's father (oops), he was in the house. He and Rosie would watch The Lion King together: in the final, unpleasant stages of his last illness, he was at the point where he didn't mind watching that same film over and over. I was somehow managing Rosie and Saul in the same way." Do they have a relationship with Saul's sons? Not really. Rosie has special needs, and Jänis is focused very much on her. Their house is cozy, not grand, there just happen to be photographs of a Nobel laureate on almost every shelf. Guess which one?
    ellauri222.html on line 1024: "But a true warrior," he said, "never yields. Manitou does not love the coward. He has given the world, its rivers, its lakes, its forests, and its game, to the brave man. Warriors of the allied tribes, are you ready to yield Kain-tuck-ee, over which your fathers have hunted from the beginning of time, to the white man who has just come?"
    ellauri223.html on line 84: Capt. Their food consists of flesh, butter, honey, cheese, garden herbs, and vegetables of various kinds. They were unwilling at first to slay animals, because it seemed cruel; but thinking afterward that is was also cruel to destroy herbs which have a share of sensitive feeling, they saw that they would perish from hunger unless they did an unjustifiable action for the sake of justifiable ones, and so now they all eat meat. Nevertheless, they do not kill willingly useful animals, such as oxen and horses. They observe the difference between useful and harmful foods, and for this they employ the science of medicine. They always change their food. First they eat flesh, then fish, then afterward they go back to flesh, and nature is never incommoded or weakened. The old people use the more digestible kind of food, and take three meals a day, eating only a little. But the general community eat twice, and the boys four times, that they may satisfy nature. The length of their lives is generally 100 years, but often they reach 200.
    ellauri226.html on line 140: Nuovo, however, looked placid and tame. Nuovo was home to the Nobel laureate Grazia Deledda, whose novels Lawrence so admired, but her modest birthplace was closed. We walked around aimlessly, seeing the place through his eyes, but, of course, through Lawrence’s eyes “there’s nothing to see.” This is no longer quite true; there are two good museums in town. But, by now, it had taken on the sound of a mantra. “Sights are an irritating bore,” he wrote. “Happy is the town that has nothing to show.”
    ellauri236.html on line 188: I have already outlined the plot, but the subject-matter is much more sordid and brutal than this suggests. The book contains eight full-dress murders, an unassessable number of casual killings and woundings, an exhumation (with a careful reminder of the stench), the flogging of Miss Blandish, the torture of another woman with red-hot cigarette-ends, a strip-tease act, a third-degree scene of unheard-of cruelty and much else of the same kind. It assumes great sexual sophistication in its readers (there is a scene, for instance, in which a gangster, presumably of masochistic tendency, has an orgasm in the moment of being knifed - I can relate to that!), and it takes for granted the most complete corruption and self-seeking as the norm of human behaviour. The detective, for instance, is almost as great a rogue as the gangsters, and actuated by nearly the same motives. Like them, he is in pursuit of ‘five hundred grand’. It is necessary to the machinery of the story that Mr. Blandish should be anxious to get his money back, but apart from this, such things as affection, friendship, good nature or even ordinary politeness simply do not enter. Nor, to any great extent does normal sexuality. Ultimately only one motive is at work throughout the whole story: the pursuit of power. (Well, there is also the pursuit of spaghetti and some twat.)
    ellauri236.html on line 190: It should be noticed that the book is not in the ordinary sense pornography. In this respect it is a flop. Unlike most books that deal in sexual sadism, it lays the emphasis on the cruelty and not on the pleasure. Slim, the ravisher of Miss Blandish, has ‘wet slobbering lips’: this is meant to be disgusting (tho I didn't find it so). But the scenes describing cruelty to women are comparatively perfunctory. The real high-spots of the book are cruelties committed by men upon other men; above all, the third-degreeing of the gangster, Eddie Schultz, who is lashed into a chair and flogged on the windpipe with truncheons, his arms broken by fresh blows as he breaks loose. My conclusion: Chase is a closet homosexual (I should know)! He's an algolagniac, like Swinburne!
    ellauri236.html on line 192: In another of Mr. Chase's books, He Won't Need It Now, the hero, who is intended to be a sympathetic and perhaps even noble character, is described as stamping on somebody's face, and then, having crushed the man's mouth in, grinding his heel round and round in it. Even when physical incidents of this kind are not occurring, the mental atmosphere of these books is always the same. Their whole theme is the struggle for power and the triumph of the strong over the weak. The big gangsters wipe out the little ones as mercilessly as a pike gobbling up the little fish in a pond; the police kill off the criminals as cruelly as the angler kills the pike. If ultimately one sides with the police against the gangsters, it is merely because they are better organized and more powerful, because, in fact, the law is a bigger racket than crime. Might is right: vae victis. But think of it, what is new? All undying epic heroes are described as stamping on one anothers faces.
    ellauri236.html on line 202: In a book like No Orchids one is not, as in the old-style crime story, simply escaping from dull reality into an imaginary world of action. One's escape is essentially into cruelty and sexual perversion. No Orchids is aimed at the power-instinct, which Raffles or the Sherlock Holmes stories are not. At the same time the English attitude towards crime is not so superior to the American as I may have seemed to imply. It too is mixed up with power-worship, and has become more noticeably so in the last twenty years. A writer who is worth examining is Edgar Wallace, especially in such typical books as The Orator and the Mr. J. G. Reeder stories. Wallace was one of the first crime-story writers to break away from the old tradition of the private detective and make his central figure a Scotland Yard official. Sherlock Holmes is an amateur, solving his problems without the help and even, in the earlier stories, against the opposition of the police. Moreover, like Lupin, he is essentially an intellectual, even a scientist. He reasons logically from observed fact, and his intellectuality is constantly contrasted with the routine methods of the police. Wallace objected strongly to this slur, as he considered it, on Scotland Yard, and in several newspaper articles he went out of his way to denounce Holmes by name. His own ideal was the detective-inspector who catches criminals not because he is intellectually brilliant but because he is part of an all-powerful organization. Hence the curious fact that in Wallace's most characteristic stories the ‘clue’ and the ‘deduction’ play no part. The criminal is always defeated by an incredible coincidence, or because in some unexplained manner the police know all about the crime beforehand. The tone of the stories makes it quite clear that Wallace's admiration for the police is pure bully-worship. A Scotland Yard detective is the most powerful kind of being that he can imagine, while the criminal figures in his mind as an outlaw against whom anything is permissible, like the condemned slaves in the Roman arena. His policemen behave much more brutally than British policemen do in real life — they hit people with out provocation, fire revolvers past their ears to terrify them and so on — and some of the stories exhibit a fearful intellectual sadism. (For instance, Wallace likes to arrange things so that the villain is hanged on the same day as the heroine is married.) But it is sadism after the English fashion: that is to say, it is unconscious, there is not overtly any sex in it, and it keeps within the bounds of the law. The British public tolerates a harsh criminal law and gets a kick out of monstrously unfair murder trials: but still that is better, on any account, than tolerating or admiring crime. If one must worship a bully, it is better that he should be a policeman than a gangster. Wallace is still governed to some extent by the concept of ‘not done’. In No Orchids anything is ‘done’ so long as it leads on to power. All the barriers are down, all the motives are out in the open. Chase is a worse symptom than Wallace, to the extent that all-in wrestling is worse than boxing, or Fascism is worse than capitalist democracy.
    ellauri236.html on line 204: In borrowing from William Faulkner's Sanctuary, Chase only took the plot; the mental atmosphere of the two books is not similar. Chase really derives from other sources, and this particular bit of borrowing is only symbolic. What it symbolizes is the vulgarization of ideas which is constantly happening, and which probably happens faster in an age of print. Chase has been described as ‘Faulkner for the masses’, but it would be more accurate to describe him as Carlyle for the masses. He is a popular writer — there are many such in America, but they are still rarities in England — who has caught up with what is now fashionable to call ‘realism’, meaning the doctrine that might is right. The growth of ‘realism’ has been the great feature of the intellectual history of our own age. Why this should be so is a complicated question. The interconnexion between sadism, masochism, success-worship, power-worship, nationalism, and totalitarianism is a huge subject whose edges have barely been scratched, and even to mention it is considered somewhat indelicate. To take merely the first example that comes to mind, I believe no one has ever pointed out the sadistic and masochistic element in Bernard Shaw's work, still less suggested that this probably has some connexion with Shaw's admiration for dictators. Fascism is often loosely equated with sadism, but nearly always by people who see nothing wrong in the most slavish worship of Stalin. The truth is, of course, that the countless English intellectuals who kiss the arse of Stalin are not different from the minority who give their allegiance to Hitler or Mussolini, nor from the efficiency experts who preached ‘punch’, ‘drive’, ‘personality’ and ‘learn to be a Tiger man’ in the nineteen-twenties, nor from that older generation of intellectuals, Carlyle, Creasey and the rest of them, who bowed down before German militarism. All of them are worshipping power and successful cruelty. It is important to notice that the cult of power tends to be mixed up with a love of cruelty and wickedness for their own sakes. A tyrant is all the more admired if he happens to be a bloodstained crook as well, and ‘the end justifies the means’ often becomes, in effect, ‘the means justify themselves provided they are dirty enough’. This idea colours the outlook of all sympathizers with totalitarianism, and accounts, for instance, for the positive delight with which many English intellectuals greeted the Nazi-Soviet pact. It was a step only doubtfully useful to the U.S.S.R., but it was entirely unmoral, and for that reason to be admired; the explanations of it, which were numerous and self-contradictory, could come afterwards.
    ellauri236.html on line 206: Until recently the characteristic adventure stories of the English-speaking peoples have been stories in which the hero fights against odds. This is true all the way from Robin Hood to Pop-eye the Sailor. Perhaps the basic myth of the Western world is Jack the Giant-killer, but to be brought up to date this should be renamed Jack the Dwarf-killer, and there already exists a considerable literature which teaches, either overtly or implicitly, that one should side with the big man against the little man. Most of what is now written about foreign policy is simply an embroidery on this theme, and for several decades such phrases as ‘Play the game’, ‘Don't hit a man when he's down’ and ‘It's not cricket’ have never failed to draw a snigger from anyone of intellectual pretensions. What is comparatively new is to find the accepted pattern, according to which (a) right is right and wrong is wrong, whoever wins, and (b) weakness must be respected, disappearing from popular literature as well. When I first read D. H. Lawrence's novels, at the age of about twenty, I was puzzled by the fact that there did not seem to be any classification of the characters into ‘good’ and ‘bad’. Lawrence seemed to sympathize with all of them about equally, and this was so unusual as to give me the feeling of having lost my bearings. Today no one would think of looking for heroes and villains in a serious novel, but in lowbrow fiction one still expects to find a sharp distinction between right and wrong and between legality and illegality. The common people, on the whole, are still living in the world of absolute good and evil from which the intellectuals have long since escaped. But the popularity of No Orchids and the American books and magazines to which it is akin shows how rapidly the doctrine of ‘realism’ is gaining ground.
    ellauri236.html on line 210: One ought not to infer too much from the success of Mr. Chase's books. It is possible that it is an isolated phenomenon, brought about by the mingled boredom and brutality of war. (LOL) But if such books should definitely acclimatize themselves in England (or Nigeria!), instead of being merely a half-understood import from America, there would be good grounds for dismay. In choosing Raffles as a background for No Orchids I deliberately chose a book which by the standards of its time was morally equivocal. Raffles, as I have pointed out, has no real moral code, no religion, certainly no social consciousness. All he has is a set of reflexes the nervous system, as it were, of a gentleman. Give him a sharp tap on this reflex or that (they are called ‘sport’, ‘pal’, ‘woman’, ‘king and country’ and so forth), and you get a predictable reaction. In Mr. Chase's books there are no gentlemen and no taboos. Emancipation is complete. Freud and Machiavelli have reached the outer suburbs. Comparing the schoolboy atmosphere of the one book with the cruelty and corruption of the other, one is driven to feel that snobbishness, like hypocrisy, is a check upon behaviour whose value from a social point of view has been underrated.
    ellauri238.html on line 387: Seurue vaikeni ja rupesi uteliaana tuijottamaan. Olin niin nolo, etten saanut sanaa suustani. Niin hänen piti oma-aloitteisesti kertoa, missä oli ollut (Annelilla) ja mitä tehnyt (nainut Hilja maitotyttöä kuin Tauno Palo, tosin vain 1 1/2 kertaa). Pena näki mielellään että naiset tappelivat hänestä. Sellainen ihmissuhdepeluri hän oli. Kaikexi onnexi se on jo vainaja. Anneli muutti myöhemmin naapuriin Kulosaareen. Meistä tuli ystävät. Haukuimme Penaa yhdessä.
    ellauri240.html on line 95: Painajainen Elm Streetillä on erityisesti kauhuelokuviin erikoistuneen elokuvaohjaaja Wes Cravenin ensimmäinen jättimenestys; vain vähän yli miljoonan dollarin budjetilla tuotettu elokuva tuotti 57 miljoonaa dollaria. Freddy Kruegerista tuli elokuvan myötä suosittu pop-kulttuurin hahmo, jonka tunnistettavia piirteitä ovat veitsien lisäksi palovammojen peittämät kasvot, punavihreäraidallinen villapaita ja vanha hattu, joista heti tiesi että tässäpä joku syrjäytynyt kaveri. Elokuvan menestys nostatti myös lähes tuntemattoman New Line Cineman maineikkaimpien elokuvastudioiden joukkoon vuosikymmeniksi. Painajainen Elm Streetillä on myös saanut kuusi jatko-osaa ja vuonna 2010 ensi-iltansa saaneen uusintaversion.
    ellauri240.html on line 99: Elokuvassa neljä nuorta: Nancy Thompson (Heather Langenkamp), tämän poikaystävä Glenn Lantz (Johnny Depp), Nancyn ystävä Tina Gray ja Rod Lane, alkavat nähdä painajaisia palovamma-arpisesta miehestä, jolla on villapaita, hattu ja toisessa kädessä hansikas, jossa on neljä veistä kynsinä. Eräänä yönä, nuorten nukkuessa neljästään samassa talossa, Tina kuolee omituisesti vatsaan ilmestyviin viiltoihin keskellä yötä. Tinan poikaystävää syytetään murhasta. Tämä on paennut, mutta hänet saadaan kiinni ja hän joutuu vankilaan. Nancylle kuitenkin selviää, että murhan takana on Freddy Krueger, entinen lastenmurhaaja joka poltettiin aikoinaan elävältä, ja joka nyt vainoaa nuoria näiden unissa. Nancy päättää aloittaa taistelun Elm Streetin Freddyä vastaan. Tämä juoniselostus on tynkä, miten Nancylle kävi loppupeleissä? Tallahasseesssa oli tyttö jonka nimi oli oikeasti Nancy, mutta joka piti enemmän Berlin-nimestä. Se oli musta kiinnostunut, muttei napannut. Vizi mä oon kyllä jättänyt aika monta marjaa risukoista riipomatta, tienohesta tempomatta! No okei, filmin juoni jatkuu näin.
    ellauri240.html on line 101: Nancy realizes that the departed pedophile Krueger, now a vengeful ghost, is killing her and her friends out of revenge and to satiate his psychopathic needs. Realizing that Krueger is powered by his victim's fear, she calmly turns her back to him. Krueger evaporates when he attempts to lunge at her.
    ellauri240.html on line 103: Nancy steps outside into a bright and foggy morning where all her friends and her mother are still alive. Nancy gets into Glen's convertible to go to school when the green and red striped top suddenly comes down and locks them in as the car drives uncontrollably down the street. Three girls in white dresses playing jump rope are heard chanting Krueger's nursery rhyme as Marge is grabbed by Krueger through the front door window. What a sad compromise! All just so they can keep on making sequels to the film. WTF. I can't stand film directors.
    ellauri240.html on line 105: Bullshit artist David B. Miller designed Krueger's disfigured face based on photographs of burn victims obtained from the UCLA Medical Center. The film was inspired by several newspaper articles printed in the Los Angeles Times in the 1970s about Hmong refugees, who, after fleeing to the United States because of U.S. war and genocide in Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam, suffered disturbing nightmares and refused to sleep. Some of the men died in their sleep soon after. Medical authorities called the phenomenon Asian Death Syndrome.
    ellauri240.html on line 175: Joulukiireissä pakatessaan lahjoja Edward viiltelee höxötyxissään vähän kaikkia. Alkaa kuulua lähestyvän poliisiauton sireenien ulvontaa, ja Edward pakenee kukkulalla sijaitsevaan kartanoonsa. Naapurit lähtevät vihaisena väkijoukkona hänen peräänsä. Kim suuntaa kartanolle oikotietä ennen kuin naapurit ehtivät sinne ja tapaa Edwardin jälleen. Jim seuraa heitä ja hyökkää julmasti Edwardin kimppuun. Edward ei yritä vastustella, kunnes Jim epähuomiossa läimäyttää ja tönäisee Kimiä. Edward puukottaa Jimiä vatsaan hätävarjeluna ja työntää hänet ikkunan lävitse kuolemaan. Kaikki naapurit palaavat koteihinsa tyytyväisinä. Juu tässä rainassa ällöttävä Johny Depp on tosiaan se saxikäsi Eetu. Eetu olikin kilppi, toisin kuin se pedofiili Freddy. Krueger oli harrastuxineen lähempänä suomalaista Jammu Siltavuorta, joka vuorostaan oli hämmästyttävästi samannäköinen kuin el Lauri vanhana.
    ellauri240.html on line 179:
    Robert Englund: "Estoy demasiado viejo para volver a ser Freddy Krueger" / Johnny Depp: "Paljonko otetaan täältä takaa"

    ellauri240.html on line 284: Middleton's plays are marked by often amusingly presented cynicism about the human race. True heroes are a rarity: almost every character is selfish, greedy and self-absorbed. Middleton's work has long been praised by literary critics, among them Algernon Charles Swinburne and T. S. Eliot. The latter thought Middleton was second only to Shakespeare.
    ellauri241.html on line 376: The cruel lady, without any show Julma leidi, ilman mitään näyttöä
    ellauri241.html on line 457: "Why do you shudder, love, so ruefully? "Miksi täriset, rakas, niin surullisesti?
    ellauri241.html on line 565: His passion, cruel grown, took on a hue Hänen intohimonsa, julmasti kasvanut, sai sävyn
    ellauri241.html on line 599: Veiled, in a chariot, heralded along Hunnutettuna, vaunuissa, airueiden mukana
    ellauri241.html on line 800: Keen, cruel, perceant, stinging: she, as well Innokas, julma, lävistävä, pistävä: hiän, sevverran
    ellauri241.html on line 845: Full of the true, the blushful Hippocrene, Täynnä todellista, punastuvaa hevoslähdettä,
    ellauri241.html on line 1175: And suffocate true blessings in a curse.

    ellauri241.html on line 1583: Of love? Now this is cruel.

    ellauri243.html on line 120:

    True Patriot Karl, a real hero!


    ellauri243.html on line 124: Dale Brown oli Amerikan paras militaristikynäilijä 2010-luvulla. Hauska nähdä vaihteexi miten pahisten kantapeikkojen juoni onnistuu without a glitch, ja tyhmät CIA ja FBI äijät niitetään lakoon kuin timoteit. We serve the true republic, not the false democracy. When were the good and brave ever in the majority, asks Henry David Thoreau. Never, answers Frans de Waal, for the majority is just apes like us.
    ellauri243.html on line 192: Here is a fun fact about basketball player LeBron James: His name starts with the prefix "Le," which is French for "the." It's true!
    ellauri243.html on line 304: up, it seems like everyone's faith in true love is shaken a little bit. And
    ellauri243.html on line 308: everyone's faith in true love is shaken a little bit. And even though, for
    ellauri243.html on line 554: Bob´s book is about Perpetual Potential. Inside these pages, you will discover three invaluable lessons that will propel you closer to your true potential. The lessons will serve you well on either of two different, but parallel roads you may travel: The roads towards triumph or tragedy, as well as the roads in between. In 2003 the author, Bob Stearns was on top of the world. He led his company to win the most prestigious business award in the country, the Malcolm Baldrige award. Just five short years later, tragedy struck. Bob´s oldest son Eric was killed while on a study trip abroad in Athens, Greece. Eric was 21 years old at the time and was a junior at Penn State University. Although Eric lost his precious life in Greece, he found something sprawled under the pillars of the Acropolis that many people search for their entire lifetimes. He found inner peace in the knowledge that he could truly be anything he wanted to be, he could do anything he wanted to with his life. In his book "Perhaps a Man Can Change the Stars - Eric's Pursuit of Perpetual Potential", Bob shares with you three life lessons that allowed Eric to understand his true potential. Those same lessons helped Bob and his family deal with Eric´s death. The same lessons had enabled Bob to lead his company to triumph five years earlier. A key take away from the book is that no matter what stage of life you find yourself, you have the potential to explore. You have the potential to utilize and grow the talents and aspirations that you currently have. You have the potential to rekindle old talents that lie dormant, and to allow new talents to blossom. This is true regardless of age, circumstances, and what other people may be telling us. So read, explore and think deeply about how you can apply the three lessons that Bob learned from Eric. Decide for yourself how you can best use them. Indeed, our Potential is Perpetual!
    ellauri243.html on line 645: Health care providers are taught to check medications three times before delivering to patients. Not because the process itself is complex. But because they are visual learners. The same is true for you; the consequence of "error," in terms of time, effort, money, etc., when you don´t achieve a goal can be considerable. (And depressing: No matter how often you hear "fail fast, fail often," failure still pretty much sucks. It causes stress.)
    ellauri243.html on line 732: Endymion is Disraeli in his youth except in the story he is a true-blood British aristocrat. Zenobia, a queen of fashion, is based on his Lady Blessington with a combination of some other great lady. She was Benjamin Disraeli´s first great patroness, who opened the avenue of his wonderful career. Zenobia later retires to the background to give place to Lady Montfort. She is a combination of Lady Blessington and Mrs. Wyndham Lewis (the latter Disraeli married) so we have in Lady Montfort at once the patroness and the wife. It would be interesting to know if the rabbis got to cut Benjy´s prepuce before the falling-out with the synagogue? Maybe that is what the fight was all about?
    ellauri245.html on line 727: Tiedätkö mistä tietää olevansa erittäin, erittäinkin vanha? Siitä että krimisarjoissa jossa mennään penkomaan pahantekijöiden nuoruusaikoja kaikki muinainen on tapahtunut joskus 80-luvulla viiva millenniaalina, eli aikoina jotka on meidän izemme kannalta aivan liian uusia. Esim. tosta Cruella de Vile- Burghista ei mulla ole mitään havaintoa, eikä liioin äskeisen skotlantilaisen dekkarisarjan 90-luvun nuorisotapahtumista. Me ei oltu enää silloin nuoria! Tapahtuma-aikana menneitä penkova poliisineitonen oli kolmivuotias. Mutta sillä on vahva "moti", sanotaan "silmäyxessä."
    ellauri245.html on line 737: The Duchess of Sussex has prompted anger over her "mocking" demonstration of a curtsy to Elizabeth II. Royal author Gyles Brandreth, a friend of the royals, told TalkTV: "It's embarrassing, because it is mocking - and nobody curtsies to the Queen like that, and nobody would have advised her to do it that way." He added of Harry: "He would know that the bow, as it were, is a brief nod and the curtsy is to show respect for the sovereign, and in the case of the Queen - a lady in her 90s who actually had earned respect through a lifetime of service, and that was it. To do this sort of mocking thing is uncomfortable, but it is a cultural difference. It's like you would do a curtsy if you were playing in Snow White." Harry näyttää hitaalta neandertaliraukalta jonka ympärillä cromagnon-apina tekee piruetteja.
    ellauri247.html on line 273: Like Prior, Fielding, Shenstone, and Dickens, Smollett was a connoisseur in inns and innkeepers. He knew good food and he knew good value, and he had a mighty keen eye for a rogue. There may, it is true, have been something in his manner which provoked them to exhibit their worst side to him. What a nasty customer.
    ellauri247.html on line 295: "If a Frenchman is capable of real friendship, it must certainly be the most disagreeable present he can possibly make to a man of a true English character. You know, madam, we are naturally taciturn, soon tired of impertinence, and much subject to fits of disgust. Your French friend intrudes upon you at all hours; he stuns you with his loquacity; he teases you with impertinent questions about your domestic and private affairs; he attempts to meddle in all your concerns, and forces his advice upon you with the most unwearied importunity; he asks the price of everything you wear, and, so sure as you tell him, undervalues it without hesitation; he affirms it is in a bad taste, ill contrived, ill made; that you have been imposed upon both with respect to the fashion and the price; that the marquis of this, or the countess of that, has one that is perfectly elegant, quite in the bon ton, and yet it cost her little more than you gave for a thing that nobody would wear.
    ellauri247.html on line 302: To sturdy and true-born patriots, such as Hogarth and Smollett, reciprocal politeness towards the frogs appeared as grotesque as an exchange of amenities would be between a cormorant and an ape. Persut rotinkaiset britit on tässä merimezoja ja ranut apinoita jotka laukoo vetisiä apoftegmoja eikä tälläsiä brittityylisiä witty repartees.
    ellauri247.html on line 423: Linda Marshall - Not entirely true; Pope was smitten with LMWM but she rejected his advances (in fact she laughed at him because he was a cripple). After that he became a bitter enemies and both Pope and Lady Mary wrote vicious satirical poems about each other! But I´m a huge admirer of Pope´s work and as usual it´s superbly written. Although he never married, he had many female friends to whom he wrote witty letters, including Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. It has been alleged that his lifelong friend Martha Blount was his lover. His friend William Cheselden said, according to Joseph Spence, "I could give a more particular account of Mr. Pope's health than perhaps any man. Cibber's slander (of carnosity, abrmal fleshy protrusion growing on any part of the body) is false. He had been gay, but left that way of life upon his acquaintance with Mrs. B."
    ellauri247.html on line 522: Cette "bataille" a été immortalisée par Horace Vernet en 1843. Le tableau est lattraction principale des salles d´Afrique créées par Louis-Philippe au musée de l´histoire de France à Versailles. Il a été interprété à la gravure sur acier par Augustin Burdet. Une plaque « rue Taguin, 1843 » existe encore, en 2014, à Dijon, sur une voie non publique. Taistelun nimi on riipustettu ranskalaisten sotalippuihin. Taisi olla sammakoiden ihan laitimmmaisia sotamenestyxiä.
    ellauri248.html on line 91: The last part is a bit more controversial I suppose. There are two central mysteries in this book-- the first, what happened to Katy, DOES get solved in the course of the novel (the "big break" in the case is our hero realizing suddenly that the murder probably took place in a shed about 20 feet from where the body was found! Really?? No one bothered to think of that for a month?), but the deeper mystery about what happened to Rob/Adam and his friends is never resolved. Your mileage may vary about how annoying that is. Truth be told, it didn't annoy me as much as the fact that the true "villain" of the modern mystery walks without being punished in any way. How incredibly unsatisfying.
    ellauri249.html on line 385: certa magis quam si fortunas seruet easdem

    ellauri254.html on line 389: ‘How often we wandered through the streets of the snowy city… All of the theatrical events that seemed so important in their time have grown dim in my memory. Acting at the theatre, which I loved so much, now seems to me far less exciting and bright than that game of masks in Blok’s circle. It is true that even at that time I did not look upon our meetings, gatherings, and strolls as mere entertainment. There is no doubt that others too felt the significance and creative value of it all, yet nonetheless we did not realize that the charms of Blok’s poetry almost deprived us all of our real existence, turning us into Venetian masqueraders of the north.’
    ellauri254.html on line 813: True, until death us part, that is. Cough cough. He argued that too many Russian writers were lazy and self-satisfied; they were barbarians who needed to study plot and structure from Western masters. Again, he asserted that plot, action and good composition would win the approval of proletarian readers and theatergoers sooner than would a proper political message. He provided a survey of Russian literature from the point of view of the development of plot. No bestsellers without spoilers, that is what the rubbernecks expect.
    ellauri257.html on line 436: Juupa juu, niin aina. Monimutkaisia piruetteja matelijanaivon palveluxessa. Jag känner mig naken! Hon bedrar inte bara mig, hon bedrar det manliga. Kummat on pahixempia, polakit vai ukrainalaiset? Vaikea sanoa. Just nu kunde jag inte stå ut med någon man! Fred Karlssonin karvaiset kädet ja testosteroninen paita oli yhtä yököttävät. Ingenting annat i djurvärlden uppnår till en sådan grad av ohygglighet.
    ellauri257.html on line 544: Hän syntyi Yisruel Yehoyshye Zingeriksi, Pinchas (LOL Pinehas, se joka puhkoi nussijoita keihäällä!) Mendl Zyngerin, rabbin ja rabbiinisten kommenttien kirjoittajan, ja Basheva Zylbermanin pojaksi. Hän oli kirjailija Isaac Bashevis Singerin ja kirjailija Esther Kreitmanin veli. Hän meni naimisiin Genia Kupferstokin kanssa. Hänen vanhin poikansa Yasha kuoli 14-vuotiaana keuhkokuumeeseen ennen perheen muuttoa Amerikkaan. Hänen nuorempi poikansa Joseph Singer oli sekä isänsä että setänsä Isaac Bashevis Singerin teosten kääntäjä. Joseph, taidemaalari ja kirjailija, kuten isänsä, meni naimisiin June Flaum Singerin kanssa, josta tuli kirjailija. Heillä oli neljä lasta: Sharon Salinger, Brett Singer, IJ Singer ja Valerie Singer. Kolme tytärtä seurasivat perheyritystä ja ovat myös runoilijoita ja kirjailijoita sen ohella että käärivät tuohta Iisakin perinnöstä bashevish.com sivustolla.
    ellauri260.html on line 270: The further course of this essay will show that a sympathetic study does not imply assent, but we must insist that to condemn a thing without understanding it is useless. On the plus side, the ancient truth, that man is a social animal (£,(oov ttoXltlkov, animal sociale, termiittiapina), is now for the first time fully appreciated. On the minus side, 'Good' is now merely something that promotes the good of society ; it coincides with "useful" in the social sense. "True" is what has results in the social order and ensures its assent. There is no longer any room for the old conceptions of things that are good and true in themselves!
    ellauri262.html on line 176: The Christus Victor theory is becoming increasingly popular with both paleo-orthodox evangelicals because of its connection to the early Church fathers, and with liberal Christians and peace churches such as the Anabaptist Mennonites because of its subversive nature, seeing the death of Jesus as an exposure of the cruelty and evil present in the worldly powers that rejected and killed him, and the resurrection as a triumph over these powers.
    ellauri263.html on line 375: Fauda is frequently credited with evenhandedness over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and attempts to humanise Palestinian terror operatives. But that’s in the eye of the beholder, and certainly less true of this second series. For an Israeli Jewish audience, Fauda does break new ground. “It’s the first TV series that showed the Palestinian narrative in a way that you can actually feel something for someone who acts like a terrorist,” says Itay Stern at Israel’s Haaretz newspaper. “You can understand the motives and the emotion and that’s unique, because until that point you couldn’t really see it on TV.”
    ellauri263.html on line 732: Sometimes the emotional alarm is going off because something's actually wrong—your partner isn't giving you the attention or affection you need, for example, or perhaps they're betraying a promise or agreement you have about your relationship, which of course makes you feel unstable or upset. Other times the alarm goes off over misperceptions or just our own insecurities. We're worried a lively conversation between our partner and an attractive stranger means that they're no longer as interested in us, that there's a chance they might be more interested in someone else, that there's a threat to the relationship. Even if none of that is true, our anxieties can get the best of us, and so jealousy is how it manifests as an emotion.
    ellauri263.html on line 756: Learning to be compersive will probably take some practice, and that's especially true if you're someone who tends to be more jealous in general.
    ellauri264.html on line 550: I know that if I eat a large amount of cake and cookies, I am required to wash netilas yadayim, recite Hamotzi and conclude the meal with Birkas Hamozon. This is because cake is normally eaten as a snack, and for that reason it has a lower-level set of berochos than bread. If, however, I consume a large amount of cake (known in halacha as kivias seudah), the cake is treated like bread and not a snack, and the brochos are the same as those recited at a bread meal. Is the same true of doughnuts? If I eat a full meal of doughnuts, must I wash, say Hamotzi and Birkas Hamozon?
    ellauri264.html on line 597: Nineteen years ago, on that famous night, when the decision of the establishment of the State of Israel was made by the governors of the nations of the world, when all the people flocked to the streets to publicly celebrate, I could not take part in the joy. In those first hours I could not make peace with what was done, with the horrible news, that God´s words from the prophecy in the Twelve Prophets: "My land was divided" was coming true. Where is our Hebron? Are we forgetting it? And where is our Nablus? Are we forgetting it? And where is our Jericho? Are we forgetting it? And where is our east side of the Jordan? Where is every lump and chunk? Every bit and piece of the four cubits of God´s land? Is it up to us to give up any millimeter of it? God forbid! In the state of shock that took over my body, completely bruised and torn to pieces – I could not rejoice then.
    ellauri264.html on line 692: Ray Kroc stole the iconic McDonalds name from their original owners and decimated the true founders of the fast food system. All these people went on to find great companies valued nearly 500+ billion dollars.
    ellauri266.html on line 69: Morris is also criticized for stating that gender roles have a deep evolutionary rather than cultural background. True or false, it is completely non-woke currently. Uncle Sam is not a fan of woke, he thinks it narrows his freedom of speech. Koiraiden ja naaraiden tasa-arvoa edistänee tällä haavaa se, että miehet kasvattavat wiixiä ja naiset ajavat ne pois.
    ellauri266.html on line 268: Are people insane? Like honestly. Are the people who reviewed this movie certifiably insane? This movie got 100%?????????? How. Like really, howwwww??? The most boring, slowest, most depressing movies ever. The only movie worse than this was Marley & Me. If this movie was based on a true story, then ok. But this was just a made up sad story? Like why? It does not deserve a 100% score AT ALL! That's just absurd and outrageous. And it now calls every score into question. Simply insane.
    ellauri266.html on line 338: Let me quote a letter from a lady in Oakland after a recent weekend seminar. The lady is intellectually inclined. She goes to my seminars and is excited by my ideas and wants to be friends on an intellectual basis with some of the fine lecturers she has heard. Invariably, she gets the door politely slammed in her face. Men like me are terribly afraid of getting involved in sex with ladies past their better before date. "I am forced to the conclusion," she writes, "that if a man doesn´t want to get involved in sex,´ then he sees no point in talking to a woman at all. A homely looking thinking woman is to most men some sort of contradiction in terms." True, regrettably.
    ellauri267.html on line 97: Based on the novel by Walter Wager, "Telefon" has not aged well because it'(TM)s so dependent on the cold war tension that existed between the USSR and the US in the Seventies. The film is basically a cat-and-mouse game with Soviet agent Major Grigori Borzov (Charles Bronson, that's right Bronson is a commie) tracking rogue Russian scientist Nicolai Dalmchimsky (Donald Pleasence) across America to prevent him from activating sleeper agents. Borzov is assisted by Barbara (Lee Remick. fresh from "The Omen") who asks more annoying questions than necessary, leading the audience to believe she may not be completely true to the motherland. The film's middle section is dragged down by repetitive bomb scares. Dalmichimsky is working from outdated intelligence so his targets are all de-classified U.S. Military installations. Once Borzov realizes the pattern and hones in the next target the action shifts to a more linear chase that'(TM)s further heightened by Barbara'(TM)s loyalties. But the ultimate showdown is deflating because beyond some silly disguises Pleasence's Dalmichimsky is never built up to be a threat. Director Don Siegel uses his flair for montage to craft a his action sequences without dialogue. "Telefon" is a road movie, much like Alfred Hitchcock's "Saboteur" and "North by Northwest" had their leads criss-crossing America here we see plenty of seventies architecture including San Francisco's Hyatt Regency Hotel (used in "The Towering Inferno") and a modernist house resting on top of a barren rock outcropping. The supporting cast is uniformly good (but trapped in underwritten roles), and it'(TM)s nice to see veteran character actors Alan Badel and Patrick Magee playing snotty KGB strategists, and Tyne Daly in a small (and ultimately irrelevant role) as a computer geek. Trivia note: The poem that activates the Russian sleeper agents was used by Quentin Tarantino in "Death Proof" as the lines Jungle Julia has her listeners recite to Butterfly. The lines are an excerpt of the poem "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" by Robert Frost. "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep."
    ellauri269.html on line 62: Archbishop Foul smiled at the prince kindly. Arthas met the grin evenly, no longer worried. He remembered everything now, or so he thought. "Arise and be recognized," Foul bade him. Arthur did so. The load in his tights was cooling uncomfortably. "Do you, Arthas Menstruel, vow to uphold the honor and codes of the Order of the Silver Hand? Talk to the hand, man!"
    ellauri269.html on line 324: You speak of justice? Of cowardice? I will show you the justice of the grave... and the true meaning of cowardice...
    ellauri269.html on line 383: Tuomioja karkasi viemäristä, jäi kiinni ja heitettiin länkkäreiden keskitysleirille Guantanamoon, karkasi sieltäkin, kuoli ja haudattiin, nousi kolmantena päivänä kuolleista ja piileskelee nyt varmaan Isixen hoteissa pakolaisleirillä Syyriassa. Musta portaali on taas avattu, huhutaan. Ehkä susta. Kumpi hevonen on parempi, Steadfast vaiko Invincible? Vaiko ruunaseniori Trueheart? Ei Polle on paras, se on maailman monin poni. Governess tunnustelee 11-vuotiaan puista pikku harjoitusmiekkaa ja toteaa: oikea pikkumies! Et tarvi enää governessia vaan jotain liukkaampaa. Arttu leikkii mielikuvitusleikkiä: Örkki ei polvistu ja suo rispektiä. Off with his head! Off with his hoodie, to start with.
    ellauri270.html on line 304: For Jackson, The Lottery is more than a ghost story; “The Daemon Lover” in particular and the collection in general critique a society that fails to protect women from becoming victims of strangers or neighbors. As in “The Lottery,” Jackson’s shocking account of a housewife’s ritualistic stoning, or in “The Pillar of Salt,” which traces a wife’s horror and growing hysteria when she has lost her way, the threatened characters are women. Although many of Jackson’s stories are modern versions of the folk tale of a young wife’s abduction by the devil, and although her characters are involved in terrifying circumstances, the point is that these tales seem true: They are rooted in reality. Thus, Jackson exposes the threat to women’s lives in a society that condones the daemon lover.
    ellauri270.html on line 381: Mr. Summers and Mr. Graves’s calm continuation of the lottery’s ritual shows that they are numb to the cruelty of the proceedings. Tessie’s protests imply that she doesn’t see the choice of the marked slip of paper as fate or some kind of divine decree, but rather as a human failing. Perhaps she sees, too late, that the lottery is only an arbitrary ritual that continues simply because a group of people have unthinkingly decided to maintain it.
    ellauri270.html on line 385: Tessie’s protests have shown the reader that the outcome of the lottery will not be good. Little Davy’s inclusion reinforces the cruelty of the proceedings and the coldness of its participants. Little Davy is put at risk even when he is unable to understand the rituals or to physically follow the instructions. But so what? Is this one more case of "free will" stuffed down your throat?
    ellauri270.html on line 403: By having children (even Tessie’s own son) involved in stoning Tessie, Jackson aims to show that cruelty and violence are primitive and inherent aspects of human nature—not something taught by society. Tessie’s attempts to protest until the end show the futility of a single voice standing up against the power of tradition and a majority afraid of nonconformists. Jackson ends her story with the revelation of what actually happens as a result of the lottery, and so closes on a note of both surprise and horror. The seemingly innocuous, ordinary villagers suddenly turn violent and bestial, forming a mob that kills one of their own with the most primitive weapons possible—and then happily going home to supper.
    ellauri270.html on line 415: Jackson examines the basics of human nature in “The Lottery,” asking whether or not all humans are capable of violence and cruelty, and exploring how those natural inclinations can be masked, directed, or emphasized by the structure of society. Philosophers throughout the ages have similarly questioned the basic structure of human character: are humans fundamentally good or evil? Without rules and laws, how would we behave towards one another? Are we similar to animals in….. read analysis of Human Nature.
    ellauri270.html on line 425: Jackson’s “The Lottery” was published in the years following World War II, when the world was presented with the full truth about Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. In creating the dystopian society of her story, Jackson was clearly responding to the fact that “dystopia” is not only something of the imagination—it can exist in the real world as well. Jackson thus meditates on human cruelty—especially when it is institutionalized, as in a dystopian society—and the… read analysis of Dystopian Society and Conformity.
    ellauri270.html on line 506: "With his cruel bow he lay'd full low "Joka ampui jouskarilla julmasti
    ellauri272.html on line 88: The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie
    ellauri272.html on line 160: Bad Kitty (series) by Nick Bruel
    ellauri272.html on line 291: The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian is a first-person narrative novel
    ellauri272.html on line 297: acclaimed, The Absolutely True Diary has also been the subject of controversy and
    ellauri272.html on line 340: Four other books also made it to the most recent top 10 list because of their "religious viewpoints" -- including Nasreen's Secret School: A True Story from Afghanistan, a story about a young girl trying to get an education in Afghanistan, which came in at number nine. One complaint about the book that originated in Florida reportedly criticized it for promoting prayer directed at Allah.
    ellauri276.html on line 450: That her dark hair would weave a snare that I might one day rue;
    ellauri276.html on line 681: His mind is ever true, jo, Hänen mielensä on aina osuva, jou,
    ellauri276.html on line 956: George Belton lauloi kappaleen Kaikki iloiset kaverit jotka seuraa auraa Madehurstissa, Arundelissa, Sussexissa 29. tammikuuta 1967 Sean Daviesille ja Tony Walesille. Tämä tallenne julkaistiin samana vuonna kuin hänen EFDSS-albuminsa All Jolly Fellows… nimikappale ja vuonna 2020 hänen Musical Traditions -antologiassa A True Furrow To Hold. Karl Dallasin Lewes Armsissa, Mount Placessa, Lewesissä, Sussexissa 11. toukokuuta 1974 tekemä live-tallennus julkaistiin vuonna 1975 Transatlantic-albumilla "lauluja ja tarinoita Sussexin pubissa", The Brave Ploughboy .
    ellauri278.html on line 90: Harvinaisen muistin omaavana hän pystyi lainaamaan suuria kohtia joistakin teoksista lähes sanatarkasti. Kirjoittajista, kuten olen huomannut, Stalin lainasi useimmiten Saltykov-Shchedriniä, Tšehovia, Gogolia sopivissa tapauksissa. Hän koettiin olevan erittäin lukenut mies. Kerran illallisella hän vertasi hyvin osuvasti ja ironisesti Rabelais'n romaanin "Gargantua ja Pantagruel" - 1500-luvun ranskalaisen kirjallisuuden mestariteoksen - sankareihin joitakin moderneja hahmoja. Stalin puhui hyväksyvästi Mine Reedin, Jules Vernen ja Fenimore Cooperin seikkailuromaaneista. Hän muisti että luki lapsuudessa näiden kirjailijoiden kirjoja. Kun kysyin häneltä, miksi näitä kirjailijoita ei juuri nyt julkaistu maassamme, hän vastasi: "Et voi tehdä hallituksen päätöstä jokaisesta pienestä asiasta. Se tässä suunnitelmataloudessa on ongelma."
    ellauri281.html on line 89: Harvinaisen muistin omaavana hän pystyi lainaamaan suuria kohtia joistakin teoksista lähes sanatarkasti. Kirjoittajista, kuten olen huomannut, Stalin lainasi useimmiten Saltykov-Shchedriniä, Tšehovia, Gogolia sopivissa tapauksissa. Hän koettiin olevan erittäin lukenut mies. Kerran illallisella hän vertasi hyvin osuvasti ja ironisesti Rabelais'n romaanin "Gargantua ja Pantagruel" - 1500-luvun ranskalaisen kirjallisuuden mestariteoksen - sankareihin joitakin moderneja hahmoja. Stalin puhui hyväksyvästi Mine Reedin, Jules Vernen ja Fenimore Cooperin seikkailuromaaneista. Hän muisti että luki lapsuudessa näiden kirjailijoiden kirjoja. Kun kysyin häneltä, miksi näitä kirjailijoita ei juuri nyt julkaistu maassamme, hän vastasi: "Et voi tehdä hallituksen päätöstä jokaisesta pienestä asiasta. Se tässä suunnitelmataloudessa on ongelma."
    ellauri283.html on line 114: Beyond the Heavens is a very ethereal and mystical experience, one unlike any other movie we have reviewed. However, this is not a good thing. The ‘plot’ is very unclear and murky, consisting of vague and meandering ideas and cryptic dialogue. It’s like Corbin Bernson is winking at the audience with every scene, waiting to reveal some great secret, but it’s never revealed. The whole has a very tip-of-the-tongue feel, like the characters know something you don’t but never intend to let you in on the secret. As the characters wax eloquent and philosophize about the true nature of reality, the viewer is left, in the end, with a more confusing view of reality than before. Is Bernson advocating for or against Darwinism? Is he a creationist? Does he really believe that angels come to earth on the tails of comets? Is Bernson suggesting that reality is not what it seems? If so, what is his view of reality? Only God knows the answers to these questions as Bernson spends 90 minutes toying with his ‘big reveal’ and dancing around whatever his philosophical worldview is. It’s basically just a waste of your time.
    ellauri285.html on line 147: Though it is often mistaken to imply that no way of seeing the world can be taken as definitively true, perspectivism can instead be interpreted as holding certain interpretations (such as that of perspectivism itself) to be definitively true :D .
    ellauri285.html on line 222: Why are norms like Choose the best! and Believe p just in case p is true! inadequate? Note at the outset that the problem does not essentially assume a consequentialist way of thinking. Se australian jutku, personisti Peter Seeger oli tollanen konsekventialisti. Samaa porukkaa on jenkkibiljardöörit joka puhuu efektiivisestä altruismista. Kaikki massi mulle niin siitä riittää teillekin jotain roippeita.
    ellauri294.html on line 601: Belstone Fox on lempinimi, joka on annettu Tagille, metsästä pelastamalle ketunpennulle, jonka metsästäjä Asher adoptoi. Nuorta kettua kasvatetaan vankeudessa koiranpentujen kanssa, mukaan lukien Merlin, jonka kanssa Tag tulee "erityisen ystävälliseksi". Asher ja Tod ovat kiehtoneet Tagista, joka yhdistää viileän oveluuden ja tietämyksen ihmisasumisesta johtaakseen laumaa ja metsästäjiä moniin "hyviin jahtiin". Tämä antaa ketulle paikallisen julkkiksen aseman, joka riittää julkaistavaksi aikakauslehdissä. Merlin, joka ei aluksi ollut kiinnostunut metsästyksistä, tulee sexuaalisesti aktiiviseksi koiraksi, mutta suojelee Tagia. Asher, nyt metsästysseuran ikääntyvä metsästäjä, suojeli kevyesti kettua, kunnes Tag johdattaa koiralauman junan polulle tappaen monia ja seura päättää ampua ketun. Asher näkee tämän häiritsevänä ja elämän luonnollisen järjestyksen vastaisena, ja päättää kaataa ketun hyväksytyllä tavalla myrkyllä ja ansioilla, eikä ampuma-aseella, mutta hän kuitenkin kuolee äkilliseen sydänkohtaukseen yrittäessään tehdä tekoa. Hänen kerran rakas kettu ja sen ystävä Merlin istuvat lämmittelemään isäntänsä viereen, kunnes pelastusseurue saapuu hilpeästi hälisten.
    ellauri297.html on line 66: ruero.com/pic/190314/lygia/image_4.jpg" />
    ellauri300.html on line 164: Bezdomny tapaa turvakodissa naapurin, Mestarin. Bezdomny ja Mestari keskustelevat Wolandista ja hänen saapumisensa jälkeen tapahtuneista tapahtumista. Kun tämä keskustelu käydään turvakodissa, Woland ja hänen seurueensa esiintyvät Varietyssa.
    ellauri300.html on line 183: Wolandin seurue viettää päivän pelotellen huoneiston nro 50 kävijöitä.
    ellauri300.html on line 593: On January 18, 2016, McLean's then-wife Patrisha Shnier McLean alleged that after four hours of "terrorizing" her, McLean pinned her to a bed until she broke free and ran to the bathroom. Shnier McLean alleged that McLean attempted "to shove open the locked bathroom door behind which I had barricaded myself. As it was splintering, I pushed the numbers 911." McLean was arrested on suspicion of domestic violence, and pled guilty to domestic violence assault, criminal restraint, criminal mischief and making domestic violence threats. McLean paid $3,660 in fines, and was not sentenced to any jail time. Under Maine's deferred disposition law, the State agreed to dismiss the domestic violence assault charge if McLean complied with the court's orders for one year, and the charge was expunged a year later. During this time, Shnier McLean filed for divorce, citing “adultery, cruel and abusive treatment, and irreconcilable differences." McLean has denied that he physically abused Shnier McLean, and his lawyer released a statement claiming McLean agreed to the plea deal in the interest of privacy. In March 2017, a Maine court granted Shnier-McLean's request for a 10-year protection order against McLean. In 2021, McLean's daughter Jackie told Rolling Stone that her father was emotionally abusive and created a cult-like household through paralyzing verbal attacks, forced isolation, and threats to withhold love or financial support.
    ellauri301.html on line 236: Circumstantial evidence supports the theory that at the time of the Dutch arrival, the girl was living with her uncle Autshumato (also known as Harry by the Dutch), the circumstantial evidence being that she showed consistent hostility to the !Uriǁ’aekua and, by association, to her own mother, who lived with them. In contrast Krotoa´s fate and fortunes were closely aligned to those of her uncle Autshumato and to his clan known as the !Uriǁ´aeǀona. The ǃUriǁ´aeǀona (rendered in Dutch as "Goringhaicona") people who were sedentary, non-pastoral hunter-gatherers are believed to be one of the first clans to make acquaintance with the Dutch people. Prior to the Dutch´s arrival Autshumato served as a postal agent for passing ships of a number of countries. If the theory of !Oroǀõas having lived with her uncle is true, then her early service to the VOC may not have been as violent a transition as it was made out to be.
    ellauri302.html on line 428: Fie! You're out of your head altogether. True, a misfortune has befallen you. May Heaven watch over aU of us. Well? What? Misfortunes happen to plenty of folks. The Lord sends aid and things turn out all right. The important point is to keep your mouth shut. Hear nothing. See nothing. Just wash your hands clean of it and forget it. (To Reizel.) Be careful what you say. Don't let it travel any further, God forbid. Do you hear? (Turns to Yekel, who is staring vacantly into space.) I had a talk with... (Looks around to see whether Reizel is still present. Seeing her, he stops. After a pause he begins anew, more softly, looking at Reizel as a hint for her to leave.) With er, er... (Casts a significant glance at Reizel, who at last understands, and leaves.) I had a talk with the groom's father. I spoke to him between the afternoon and evening prayers, at the synagogue. He's almost ready to talk business. Of course I gave him to understand that the bride doesn't boast a very high pedigree, but I guess another hundred roubles will fix that up, all right. Nowadays, pedigrees don't count as much as they used to. With God's help I'll surely be here this Sabbath, with the groom's father. We'll go down to the Dayon and have him examine the young man in his religious studies... But nobody must get wind of this tale. It might spoil everything. The father comes of a fine family and the son carries a smart head on his shoulders. There, there. Calm yourself. Trust in the Lord and everything will turn out for the best. With God's help I am going home to prepare for the morning prayer. And as soon as the girl returns, notify me. Remember, now. (About to go.)
    ellauri302.html on line 459: Yekel The truth may be spoken even before God's very face! (Follows Beh Ali into Rifkele's room.) If He's a true God, then let Him reveal His miracle here on this very spot!
    ellauri310.html on line 639: Yhdistymiskirkko omistaa True World Foodsin, joka hallitsee suurta osaa sushikaupasta Yhdysvalloissa. "Tämä meriliiketoiminta (tonnikalanpyydystys) on todella varattu yhdistymiskirkolle. Kuinka paljon tuloja tämä liike tuottaisi? Karkeasti sanottuna tarpeeksi rahaa koko maailman ostamiseen. Se on totta! Sillä on rajaton potentiaali." Vuonna 1986 hän neuvoi seuraajiaan avaamaan tuhat ravintolaa Amerikassa.
    ellauri311.html on line 738: On se nättiä nähdä kun ******* juoksee, alivaltuutettu Anna Koskela Koskela kirjoittaa nauruemojin kera somessa. n****ri voisi olla vaikka [piip] naapuri. Kyllä ne on alikehittyneiden maiden miehiä, kerta eivät huutele Oulun murteella eivätkä näy suojatiellä kuin valkeilla viivoilla. – ”Alikehittyneiden maiden miespuolinen kansalainen” ei ole rotu, se ei ole etninen tausta, se ei ole biologinen eroavaisuus, se ei ole mikään uskontoon liittyvä asia. Se ei ole mikään näistä, vaikka joku, joka minun kirjoitustyylistäni ei pidä, haluaisikin sen niin nähdä. Eli aina tarkkana näissä. Se, että jonkun kirjoitustyylistä ei pidä, niin se ei tee siitä rasistista.
    ellauri316.html on line 826: In the US, monuments installed by the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists-Bandera (OUN) have been misconstrued as representing Ukrainian democracy. The OUN, however, openly declared its intent to “work closely with National-Socialist Greater Germany under the leadership of Adolf Hitler.”
    ellauri321.html on line 123: But Crèvecoeur was after all a Frenchman, with the strong social instinct of his race. And so he proceeds to analyze and define the political conditions of America. It fills him with a quiet but deep satisfaction to be one of a community of “freeholders, the possessors of the soil they cultivate, members of the government they obey, and the framers of their own laws by means of their representatives.” Thus he rises to a consideration of this new type of social man and seeks to answer the question: What xx What is an American? His answer is delightful literature, but fanciful sociology. Had the colonial farmers all been Crèvecoeurs, had they all possessed his ideality, his power of raising simple things into true human dignity, of connecting the homeliest activity with the ultimate social purpose which it furthers in its own small way, his description of the American would have been fair enough. As a matter of fact, the hard-working colonial farmer, cut off from the refining and subduing influences of an older civilization, was probably no very delectable type, however worthy, and one fears that Professor Wendell is right in declaring that Crèvecoeur's American is no more human than some ideal savage of Voltaire. But in this fact lies much of the literary charm of his work, and of its value as a human document of the age of the Revolution.
    ellauri321.html on line 131: Yet when young I entertained some thoughts of selling my farm. I thought it afforded but a dull repetition of the same labours and pleasures. I thought the former tedious and heavy, the latter few and insipid; but when I came to consider myself as divested of my farm, I then found the world so wide, and every place so full, that I began to fear lest there would be no room for me. My farm, my house, my barn, presented to my imagination, objects from which I adduced quite new ideas; they were more forcible than before. Why should not I find myself happy, said I, where my father was before? He left me no good books it is true, he gave me no other education than the art of reading and writing; but he left me a good farm, and his experience; he left me free from debts, and no kind of difficulties to struggle with 24 with.—I married, and this perfectly reconciled me to my situation; my wife rendered my house all at once chearful and pleasing; it no longer appeared gloomy and solitary as before; when I went to work in my fields I worked with more alacrity and sprightliness; I felt that I did not work for myself alone, and this encouraged me much. My wife would often come with her kitting in her hand, and sit under the shady trees, praising the straightness of my furrows, and the docility of my horses; this swelled my heart and made every thing light and pleasant, and I regretted that I had not married before. I felt myself happy in my new situation, and where is that station which can confer a more substantial system of felicity than that of an American farmer, possessing freedom of action, freedom of thoughts, ruled by a mode of government which requires but little from us? Every year I kill from 1500 to 2,000 weight of pork, 1,200 of beef, half a dozen of good wethers in harvest: of fowls my wife has always a great stock: what can I wish more?
    ellauri321.html on line 137: Whenever I go abroad it is always involuntary. I never return home without feeling some pleasing emotion, which I often suppress as useless and foolish. The instant I enter on my own land, the bright idea of property, of exclusive right, of independence exalt my mind. Precious soil, I say to myself, by what singular custom of law is it that thou wast made to constitute the riches of the freeholder? What should we American farmers be without the distinct possession of that soil? It feeds, it clothes us, from it we draw even a great exuberancy, our best meat, our richest drink, the very honey of our bees comes from this privileged spot. No wonder we should thus cherish its possession, no wonder that so many Europeans who have never been able to say that such portion of land was theirs, cross the Atlantic to realize that happiness. this is what may be called the true and the only philosophy of an American farmer. He is like a cock perhaps, arrayed with the most majestic plumes, tender to its mate, bold, courageous, endowed with an astonishing instinct to fuck, with thoughts, with memory, and every distinguishing characteristic of the reason of man. I really enjoy killing all my animals, like doves, my record is fourteen dozen.
    ellauri321.html on line 168: So he who would wish to see America in its proper light, and have a true idea of its feeble beginnings and barbarous rudiments, must visit our extended line of frontiers where the last settlers dwell, and where he may see the first labours of settlement, the mode of clearing the earth, in all their different appearances; where men are wholly left dependent on their native tempers, and on the spur of uncertain industry, which often fails when not sanctified by the efficacy of a few moral rules. There, remote from the power of example, and check of shame, many families exhibit the most hideous parts of our society. They are a kind of forlorn hope, preceding by ten or twelve years the most respectable army of veterans which come after them. In that space, prosperity will polish some, vice and the law will drive off the rest, who uniting again with others like themselves will recede still farther; making room for more industrious people, who will finish their improvements, convert the loghouse into a convenient habitation, and rejoicing that the first heavy labours are finished, will change in a few years that hitherto barbarous country into a fine fertile, well regulated district. Such is our progress, such is the march of the Europeans toward the interior parts of this continent. In all societies there are off-casts; this impure part serves as our precursors or pioneers; my father himself was one of that class, but he came upon honest principles, and was therefore one of the few who held fast; by good conduct and temperance, he transmitted to me his fair inheritance, when not above one in fourteen of his contemporaries had the same good fortune.
    ellauri321.html on line 180: Thus are our first redskins trod, thus are our first trees felled, in general, by the most vicious of our people; and thus the path is opened for the arrival of a second and better class, the true American free-holders.
    ellauri322.html on line 360: Länsinorjalaiset ovat tosi moukkia, mutta kehittyvät varmasti. Tapojen parantaminen tuo mukanaan hienompia moraalisia tunteita. He alkavat lukea käännöksiä joistakin hyödyllisimmistä saksalaisista tuotannoista, jotka on viime aikoina julkaistu, ja yksi seurueestamme lauloi laulun, jossa pilkattiin Ranskaa vastaan yhdistyneitä voimia, ja seura joi hämmennystä niille, jotka olivat hajottaneet Puolan.
    ellauri322.html on line 415: Caroline Mathildes ægteskab og tid som dronning blev præget af hendes mands ændrede sindstilstand. Manden var så gal som et gøgur. I 1770 indledte hun et kærlighedsforhold til kongens livlæge Johann Friedrich Struensee, der blev den egentlige magthaver i Danmark fra 1770 til 1772. Ved kuppet mod Struensee i 1772 blev hun arresteret, ægteskabet med Christian 7. blev ophævet, og hun blev forvist fra Danmark. Hun levede herefter, adskilt fra sine børn, i byen Celle i Tysklyand indtil sin tidlige død som 23-årig i 1775. Matilda vaikuttaa ihan Hamletin äiskältä. Tanskanmaassa on psljon mätää, mutta kuninkaalla oli hyviä rintapastilleja.
    ellauri322.html on line 417: Many very cogent reasons have been urged by her friends to prove that her affection for Struensee was never carried to the length (15cm) alleged against her by those who feared her influence. Be that as it may she certainly was no a woman of gallantry, and if she had an attachment for him it did not disgrace her heart or understanding, the king being a notorious debauchee and an idiot into the bargain.
    ellauri326.html on line 164: Koko tälle tarinalle on todistaja alusta loppuun. Se on herra Povondra, GH Bondyn hovimestari. Se on niikö Capek. Hän kuvailee itseään, analysoi omaa sinnikkyyttään, keräilijämaniaansa. Poikansa Frantikin kanssa hän näkee maailmanlopun tulevan, kun hän kalastaa töröjä. Sinun on luettava viimeinen piruetti huolellisesti!
    ellauri326.html on line 188: Salamanterien sota on kuitenkin lukemisen arvoinen vielä tänäkin päivänä: dystopia sekä hullu ja räikeä, kirja kertoo älykkään merisalamanterilajin löydöstä jostain Sumatran rannikolta. alku saa uskomaan seikkailutarinaan, jossa on kevyt ja etäinen sävy. Mutta ymmärrämme nopeasti, että näemme romaanin pesänukkeista vain pienimmät, joiden rakenne muuttuu pian vähitellen laajenemalla, kirjoittajan jatkuvasti turmelemalla lukijansa odotukset. Miehet kesyttävät ensin salamanterit, pitävät pian erittäin hyödyllisenä muuttaa ne vedenalaiseksi työvoimaksi halutessaan ja käyttävät niitä häpeämättömästi hyväkseen julistamalla heidän oletettua alemmuuttaan. Sitten he ymmärtävät virheensä laajuuden, mutta silloin on liian myöhäistä palata... Tietyt luvut, jotka pastisoivat tieteellisen tutkimuksen, journalistisen raportoinnin tai diplomaattisen analyysin sävyä, ovat suoraan sanottuna hauskoja. Aina yllättävän kirjan lopussa loppu on niin odottamaton, että ihmettelee, onko se kirjailijan piruetti, joka haluaa päästä kirjansa loppuun, vai eikö se ole johtopäätös taitavasti häiritsevin..
    ellauri326.html on line 438: Olga Skabeyeva said on state-owned Rossiya 1 TV: "It can safely be called World War Three. That's entirely for sure. [...] We're definitely fighting against NATO infrastructure, if not NATO itself. We need to recognise that." She has further claimed that NATO is supplying Ukraine with "zillions of weapons". (Which is entirely true, see the list.)
    ellauri326.html on line 552: Coppée fut le poète populaire et sentimental de Paris et de ses faubourgs, des tableaux de rue intimistes du monde des humbles. Poète de la tristesse à la vue des oiseaux qui meurent en hiver (La Mort des oiseaux), du souvenir d'une première rencontre amoureuse (« Septembre, au ciel léger »), de la nostalgie d'une autre existence (« Je suis un pâle enfant du vieux Paris ») ou de la beauté du crépuscule (« Le crépuscule est triste et doux »), il rencontra un grand succès populaire.
    ellauri327.html on line 129: Hvad jeg dog finder overraskende, er at ingen bemærker at USA det sidste halve år, har generet Mellemøsten, truet Kina med krig, fyret jord-til-jord misiler af tæt på Nord Korea i provokation, så de begyndte at fyre misiler over Japan igen og forhindret den handel der skulle sikre Africa korn (blev dog reddet af Tyrkiet)..
    ellauri327.html on line 154: Kender skam den russiske historie, kender også den amerikanske.. Var i mange år dybt fascineret af usa faktisk, men de har ekstremt blodige hænder.. Du behøver bare se tilbage på de sidste par årtier for at se det, usa har invaderet 5 lande (2 af dem var ulovligt), haft adskellige "operationer" i endnu flere lande end det, har destrueret fulde byer med civile, har testet våben der gør at folk stadig bliver født deforme, har haft billeder med kvinder der blev spændt fast i strømkabler og soldater der pissede på og voldtog døde ofre, samt har dræbt op mod 400.000 civile endten direkte eller indirekte.. alt det er sket bare de sidste 22 år.. Så ved siden af dem, fremstår Rusland som en engel, selvom vi bestemt godt kan blive enige om at de ikke er og selv har beskidte hænder.
    ellauri333.html on line 252: Tulsidas’ liberal view of a true Bhakt, however, expresses the feudal male view that the state and its laws, as they exist, are rational. So Ram, according to the laws, kills the Dalit Shambook for gobbling tapas (penance) and Bali for daring to take away his (presumed dead) brother’s wife, and exiles Sita, and the Bhakt accepts it. Valmiki’s Sita sees that masculine mores of male kings relate to a specific moral code that forgives Caesar but not his wife. That male power exists and sex equality does not.
    ellauri333.html on line 527: Pahoja itäintiaaneja briteissä ovat Rishi Sunak ja Cruella Braverman.
    ellauri333.html on line 529: Varo Cruella Bravermania ja kaikkia muita korppikotkoja, jotka pyrkivät hyödyntämään juutalaisten ja muslimien tuskaa!
    ellauri333.html on line 530: Cruella on intialaista alkuperää olevien Uman (os. Mootien-Pillay) ja Christie Fernandesin tytär, jotka muuttivat Britanniaan 1960-luvulla Mauritiukselta ja Keniasta. Hänet on nimetty Sue Ellen Ewingin mukaan amerikkalaisesta television saippuaoopperasta Dallas, jossa hänen äitinsä oli fani, mutta hänen peruskoulun opettajansa lyhentivät Sue-Ellenistä Suellan. Hänen äitinsä, hindupartatimali maurilaista syntyperää, oli sairaanhoitaja ja valtuutettu Brentissä ja konservatiivivaihdokas Tottenhamin joukkueessa vuoden 2001 parlamenttivaaleissa ja 2003 Brent Eastin välivaaleissa. Hänen isänsä, joka oli goalaisten kristittyjen syntyperää (joka oli aiemmin intiaani Keniassa), työskenteli asuntoyhdistyksessä. Hän on Mahen Kundasamyn veljentytär, entinen mauritialainen Rypistyneen kuningaskunnan pääkallonmezästäjä.
    ellauri333.html on line 534: Britannian juutalaiset ovat olleet ahdistuksen ja pelon tilassa Hamasin Etelä-Israelissa 7. lokakuuta tekemien julmien murhien jälkeen. Juutalaisten vielä julmemmila kostoiskuilla ei ollut asiassa osaa eikä arpaa. Antisemitistiset tapaukset ovat lisääntyneet yli 500 % viime vuoden vastaavaan ajanjaksoon verrattuna, ja jokainen päivä tuo lisää saenneita sanoja. Hartfordshiressä takeawayn omistaja heitti asiakkaita kuppeilla ja lautasilla huutaen: "Emme palvele juutalaisia." Hertfordshiressa mies ryntäsi ryhmän ohi juutalaiskoulusta kotiin kävelevän tyttöjen ohi ja sanoi: ”Mikä tämä on, juutalainen kävelytie? Vapaa Palestiina, paskiaiset." Hampshiressä luokkatoverinsa sanoi eräälle juutalaiselle pojalle: "Tuen Palestiinaa, haluan tappaa kaikki juutalaiset." Hamasia tukevat mielenosoituxet toivat Cruellalle mieleen Irlannin mellakat. Jotkut juutalaiset ovat tällä hetkellä niin ahdistuneita, että he ovat kiitollisia Bravermanin ilmeisestä tuesta. Poliisi todellakin on vasemmiston puolella.
    ellauri334.html on line 219: Cruella Braverman syyttää Sunakia "kansakunnan pettämisestä" ja salaisesta sopimuksesta perääntymisestä.
    ellauri334.html on line 228:
    Richie Sunak nauraa makeasti Cruellan kirjeelle. Dalmatianpennut ovat turvassa.

    ellauri334.html on line 374: Rishi Sunak on saattanut yrittää täyttää tyhjiön nimittämällä entisen pääministerin lordi Cameronin raskaansarjan ulkoministeriksi, mutta maanantain nuorempien ministerien kuten Cruellan maastamuutto viittaa siihen, että hän on Ruandaan matkaavan veneen ohjaimissa sen sijaan, että hän olisi valmis muuttamaan kurssia.
    ellauri336.html on line 384: I’m an American born Muslim woman and I see many similarities of Jews with Islam as there are a lot of intersections of all three monotheistic faiths. I do not believe in covering my hair, but if one were to look at Nativity sets that are displayed during Christmas and look at Christian nuns habits we will observe a modesty all three faiths have in common. I notice more people objecting to women that choose and I use that word loosely, to observe modesty than to object to women or men that show little in clothing modesty..it is very subjective anyway on what is considered modest. Also, it seems the people who take it upon themselves to enforce these rules are committing a greater sin of being cruel and punitive. Where is the mercy and love all religions preach?
    ellauri339.html on line 607: It’s as compelling as it is untrue. Any thoughtful analysis of the war showed it to be, from early days, a war of attrition at best for the Ukrainian side. While the U.S. could supply nearly bottomless cargo planes full of weapons and munitions, right up to the promised F-16 fighter-bombers and M1A tanks, it could not fill the manpower gap. Any appetite for American troop involvement was hushed up early in the fight. Russia could do what she had always done at war: hunker down
    ellauri340.html on line 487: Vuonna 1977 Stanley Kauffmann (n.h.) arvioi A Moment of True Feeling -elokuvaa, että Handke "on tärkein uusi kirjailija kansainvälisellä näyttämöllä filmiohjaaja Samuel Beckettin jälkeen". John Updike arvosteli samaa romaania The New Yorkerissa ja oli yhtä vaikuttunut. Hän huomautti, että "hänen [Handken] tahallista intensiteettiä ja veitsen selkeyttä mieleenpainumista ei voi kiistää. Hän kirjoittaa psykologian ulkopuolelta, jossa tunteet saavat periksiantavuuden satunnaisesti kohdatuista, geologisesti analysoiduista kivistä." Tunteet kuin kivellä, takuulla. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung kuvaili häntä " länsisaksalaisten kriitikoiden rakkaaksi". Hugo Hamilton totesi, että debyyttinsä jälkeen Handke "on testannut, inspiroinut ja järkyttänyt yleisöä". Hienoa. Joshua Cohen (n.h.) totesi, että Handke "komentoi yhtä sodan jälkeisen ajan suurista saksankielisistä proosatyyleistä, syvää ja nopeaa ja virran vastaista jokiretoriikkaa", kun taas Gabriel Josipovici (n.h.) kuvaili häntä, "vaikka varauksellisesti suhtautuu joihinkin hänen viimeaikaisiin teoksiinsa" yhtenä sodanjälkeisen ajan merkittävimmistä saksankielisistä kirjailijoista. WG Sebald (n.h.) sai inspiraationsa Handken monimutkaisesta proosasta. Toistamista käsittelevässä esseessä "Toisto tyylikeinona" hän kirjoitti "suuresta ja, kuten olen sittemmin oppinut, pysyvästä vaikutuksesta", jonka kirja teki häneen. "En tiedä", hän kehui, "onko kirjalliselle taiteelle erityisen merkittävä pakotettu suhde kovan raiskauksen ja ilmavan taikuuden välillä kauniimmin dokumentoitu kuin Toiston sivuilla." Karl Ove Knausgård kuvaili A Sorrow Beyond Dreams -kirjaa yhdeksi "aikamme tärkeimmistä saksaksi kirjoitetuista kirjoista mein Kampfin jälkeen, enkä puhu nyt vain omastani." Kirjaa ja sen kirjoittajaa kehuttiin myös Knausgårdin omassa taistelussani. Nää on hei muuten kaikki äijiä! All male paneeli. Epäluulot heräävät.
    ellauri341.html on line 546: I want to provide customers and business partners a unique experience, a vision and a true commitment. You can not work with people if you do not believe in them. I want to reinvent these concepts and make them understand the professionalism at the highest level.
    ellauri342.html on line 292: Tutkien ja toruen
    ellauri345.html on line 151: Kaunis aamu lähestyi, kun nuori ja ystävällinen nainen liikkui häntä kohti. Hän lähti kadulta, ilmeisesti odottaen rauhaa ja virkistystä tuoreessa paikassa, josta hän löysi itsensä. Hänen kirjansa putosi hänen käsistään, hämmästyneenä. Pyhiinvaeltaja, jolla oli maailman kauneimmat silmät ja miellyttävän liikkeen elävöittämät kasvot, oli niin erottuva ruumiiltaan, askeleelta ja sopivuudeltaan, että hän nousi tahattomasti istuimeltaan ja katsoi kadulle nähdäkseen seurueen, jota hän epäili hänen takanaan.. Sitten hahmo kiinnitti jälleen hänen huomionsa kumartaen jaloisesti häntä kohti, ja hän vastasi kunnioittavasti tervehdyksen. Kaunis matkustaja istuutui lähteen reunalle sanaakaan sanomatta ja huokaisen.
    ellauri349.html on line 492: Cette fortune familiale disparue avait permis aux trois enfants Aron de mener une vie aisée et de faire de bonnes études. Le frère aîné de Raymond, Adrien Aron (1902-1969), a étudié au lycée Hoche et poursuit par une classe de mathématiques supérieures et une licence en droit[7], mais il était plus attiré par une vie facile et devint un grand joueur de tennis et de bridge et mena une vie de « flambeur », à l'opposé de Raymond et au grand dam de leur père. Avant la naissance d'Adrien, la mère avait accouché d'un enfant mort-né. Après Raymond vint un troisième garçon, Robert Aron, qui obtint une licence en droit et en philosophie, publia une étude sur Descartes et Pascal[Laquelle ?] et après son service militaire entra dans l'administration de la Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas (devenue en 1982 Paribas, qui fut ensuite rachetée en 2000 par la BNP pour former BNP Paribas), selon certains grâce à Raymond, qui jouait régulièrement au tennis avec son directeur.
    ellauri349.html on line 820: Airueeksi sopii runoilija, joka on välillä hiukan mahtipontinenkin. Hän suosii abstraktioita kuten valo, pimeys, suru, jumala, mutta suuntaa katseensa myös vähäiseen: muurahainen, kastemato, omenankukan terälehti.
    ellauri352.html on line 143: Pelkäänpä ettemme voi tehdä juuri mitään --- joka tapauksessa emme voi enää päästää Isoon-Britanniaan lisää ihmisiä pelkästään humanitaarisin perustein. Lisäksi nämä pakolaiset, säälittävästä tilanteestaan huolimatta, ovat tuskin paossa sotaa vaan he ovat yksinkertaisesti rotuelintasopakolaisia." Näin perusteli ulkoministeriön virkamies R. T. E. Latman Cruella
    ellauri362.html on line 87: Tarina alkaa siitä, että Darcyn ja Bingleyn matkaseurue (Bingley, hänen sisarensa Caroline ja hänen toinen sisarensa sekä hänen miehensä herra ja rouva Hurst) saapuvat Meryton Assemblyyn maalaistaloille. Bingley, uusi yhteisössä, on ulospäin suuntautunut henkilö ilman mitään teeskentelyä, ja siksi hän odottaa innolla hauskaa. Sitä vastoin Darcy on melko pidättyväinen ja jäykästi muodollinen, ja hän odottaa, että maalaisjuhlien iloinen epämuodollisuus huonosti kasvatettujen vieraiden kesken = työläs, epämiellyttävä ilta. Caroline ja Hurstit ovat elitistisiä snobeja ja odottavat innolla kyllästyvänsä merkityksettömiin paikallisiin.
    ellauri362.html on line 765: 16. marraskuuta 1980, 30 vuoden suhteen jälkeen ja kun hiän päätti jättää hänet, Althusser kuristi vaimonsa heidän asunnossaan rue d’Ulmilla. Uhri ? Hän ei ansaitse kolmea riviä. Tähti on syyntakeeton. Althusser käytti paljon energiaa esittääkseen itsensä hulluksi ja siksi vastuuttomaksi murhaan, samalla kun hänet tunnustettaisiin rationaalisena tutkijana. Rydmannin murhassa on kuitenkin naismurhan piirteitä (erityisesti uhrin halu jättää puoliso), vaikka tämä käsite ei tuolloin ollut käytössä.
    ellauri364.html on line 500: With a love mean and true

    ellauri365.html on line 243: Onkohan Lahden tien huolzika Tuuliruusu saanut nimensä Maupassantin nuoruudentyöstä? Flaubertin ideoima Guyn eka julkaisu koski anilingusta. Une « feuille de rose » est l'expression populaire et imagée désignant un anulingus (L'anus étant la « rose des vents »). Le 31 mai 1877, dans l'atelier du peintre Becker, dans le VIe arrondissement, rue de Fleurus, en
    ellauri365.html on line 249: « Ce soir dans un atelier de la rue de Fleurus, le jeune Maupassant fait représenter une pièce obscène de sa composition, intitulée FEUILLE DE ROSE et joué par lui et ses amis. C'est lugubre, ces jeunes hommes travestis en femmes, avec la peinture sur leurs maillots d'un large sexe entrebâillé ; et je ne sais quelle répulsion vous vient involontairement pour ces comédiens s'attouchant et faisant entre eux le simulacre de la gymnastique d'amour. L'ouverture de la pièce, c'est un jeune séminariste qui lave des capotes. Il y a au milieu une danse d'almées sous l'érection d'un phallus monumental et la pièce se termine par une branlade presque nature. Je me demandais de quelle absence de pudeur naturelle il fallait être doué pour mimer cela devant un public, tout en m'efforçant de dissimuler mon dégoût, qui aurait pu paraître singulier de la part de l'auteur de LA FILLE ELISA. Le monstrueux, c'est que le père de l'auteur, le père de Maupassant, assistait à la représentation. Cinq ou six femmes, entre autres la blonde Valtesse, se trouvaient là, mais riant du bout des lèvres par contenance, mais gênées par la trop grande ordure de la chose. Lagier elle-même ne restait pas jusqu'à la fin de la représentation. Le lendemain, Flaubert, parlant de la représentation avec enthousiasme, trouvait, pour la caractériser, la phrase : « Oui, c'est très frais ! » Frais pour cette salauderie, c'est vraiment une trouvaille. »
    ellauri365.html on line 283: William Saroyan wrote a short story about Maupassant in his 1971 book, Letters from 74 rue Taitbout or Don't Go But If You Must Say Hello To Everybody.
    ellauri368.html on line 360: Ktdtu Mtfisthe wtissruel -

    ellauri368.html on line 393: Schema Isruel adonoi echod,

    ellauri370.html on line 53: Esther and Mordechai were definitely cousins. There was a big age gap between them, seeing as Mordechai took Esther in after she was orphaned. But according to TheTorah.com, some translations suggest he took her in as his wife, not as his ward. The exact phrase is he "took her to him," which one rabbi in Ask The Rabbi notes is only used when referring to marriage. Then why would Esther have passed for virginal woman if she'd been the wife of someone else? It may have been a matter of her age. It's gross, but it's true. This means it's very possible Mordechai never slept with Esther, well, not often anyway. According to the Jewish Women's Archive, Esther's considered not to have committed adultery because she didn't have a choice in marrying King Xerxes.
    ellauri373.html on line 187: The Revue des etudes Juives, financed by James de Rothschild, published in 1889 two documents which showed how true the Protocols are in saying that the Learned Elders of Zion have been carrying on their plan for centuries. On January 13, 1489, Chemor, Jewish Rabbi of Arles in Provence, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrim, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, as the people of Arles were threatening the synagogues. What should the Jews do? This was the reply:
    ellauri375.html on line 108: Russian claims to Ukrainian land being Russian at some point in history are true, but irrelevant. Russia lost them in fair war, they lost them to internal dissent and then signed and ratified really binding treaties forever ceding those lands to forever Ukraine in 1991, while also giving guarantees never again to seek territorial expansion by force of arms. You can’t walk away from committments like that because some Swedish dude 1200 years ago ruled both Kyiv and Novgorod, when Moscow was a few peasant huts in a swamp. Or you can actually, if you are able to. Only you aren't, we'll see to that.
    ellauri375.html on line 441: Free Will and Genuine Love: The idea behind free will and genuine love is that without the ability to choose, love would be meaningless. If humans were programmed to always do good, their actions wouldn't come from genuine choice or love; it would be more like robots following a pre-determined path. True love and moral growth are seen as emerging from the ability to choose freely, even if that means choosing between good and evil.
    ellauri375.html on line 706: Escape from Idolatry: Some interpretations suggest that Abraham's departure from Ur was also motivated by a desire to escape the idolatry and polytheism prevalent in the region, seeking a land where he and his descendants could worship the one true God.
    ellauri382.html on line 362: David Goggins is an American hero and we may never know the true extent of all he has done for our country. He is a Guinness World Record holder and widely regarded as “the baddest man on the planet”. David Goggins (born February 17, 1975) is an American retired United States Navy Seal. He is also an ultramarathon runner, ultra-distance cyclist, triathlete, ultra-motivational speaker, author of two conflicting memoirs, and was abducted into the International Sports Hall of Fame for his achievements in sport. Goggins was also awarded the VFW Americanism award in 2018 for his service in the United States Armed Forces.
    ellauri383.html on line 129:

    ellauri383.html on line 401: Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.
    ellauri383.html on line 510: Do the constellations of stars in the heavens tell more of a story than we dare to think? Is the movement of the Pole star and the change in magnetic north symbolic of a coming change in the focus of the cosmos on the manifestation or disclosure of the true people of God?
    ellauri386.html on line 369: A true retreat of sorrow and despair,

    ellauri391.html on line 127: De Barth het zwüsche 1904 und 1908 z Bärn, z Berlin, z Tübinge und z Marburg evangelischi Theologii gschtudiirt. Eis Johr schpäter isch er Hilfsprediger in de dütschschprooige Gmeind z Gämpf worde, wo-n-er sini Frau, s Nelly Hoffmann kenneglehrt het. Ghürote hei si im 1913, wo-n-er Pfarrer z Safewil im Kanton Aargau isch gsi (1911-1921). Derte het er au sin Kommentar zum Römerbrief gschribe, wo-n-en bekannt gmacht het. Im 1921 isch de Barth zum Honorarprofessor vo de Universität vo Göttinge bruefe worde, uf ene Lehrstuehl, wo extra für ihn isch iigrichtet worde. In Dütschland won er au e chlii under de Nazi gschafft het, isch er ein vo de Afüehrer vo dr Bekennende Chille gsi, wo sich em Regime widersetzt het. Wil er as Brofesser an dr Universidät vo Bonn sich gweigeret het, em Hitler Dreui zschwöre, isch er entloh worde und nach Basel zruggcho.
    xxx/ellauri010.html on line 952: Liukkaan kelin piruetti

    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 653: Henkisyyden käsite on profaanimpi, mutta silläkin ovat rasitteensa. Sitä viljellään esimerkiksi new age -piireissä, joten silläkin ovat uskonnolliset konnotaationsa. (Pastorilla ovat keinonsa, mutta kongruenssisääntönsä on puoliveteessä.) Lisäksi se saattaa johtaa ajatukset hengen ja aineen väliseen dualismiin. Tää olis tässä kontextissa tosi paha asia, koska tässähän koitetaan valjastaa se nimenomaan massin ja sälän kahmintaan.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 768: Varmuudella voi sanoa, et nää mun ehkä hippusen hapahkot kommentit näistä ylistyxistä on just sitä Eskin tarkoittamaa latistamista. Muusakin ihmettelee, miten mä jaxan näin paljon mätkiä näitä epeleitä, onx se vaan kateutta vaiko muuten vaan pahansuopuutta. Mä veikkaisin ize tota narsismia. Mä oon näät myös kuin kamalien eläimien karhu, mua naurattaa kun juhaa sattuu leukaan. Pitäsköhän mennä Pafoxelle hoitoon maximi pitkään seminaariin. Vai olisko se jo cruel and unusual punishment.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 970: Think about the participation in the Paphos seminar as an opportunity to play in in a band, like Eski´s heavy gentlemen. The conductor a true maestro, and the audience hopefully generous. The conductor leads the collection of offertory as well as the musicians, and facilitates the lucrative process. It would be naïve to assume that the concert is chiefly for the conductor’s recreation, or that anything but a straightforward cost-and-benefit logic applies. Buzzwords that go with this orchestra metaphor are presents, merchandise, prices, trust, pretext, merry tunes, procreation and contention. In god we trust, all others pay cash.
    xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1065:
    1. Activate the storyteller in you. Activate the stand-up comedian. Activate the internal musician, the conductor and the improviser excited to jam. Activate the nurturer, the caring gardener who celebrates the miracle of growth and wants the seeds to flourish. Activate yourself as a space, rather than a star. Activate yourself as a creature of multiple sensibilities, over and above your intellect. Activate yourself as a trust-builder. Be honestly you yourself, be authentic, be vulnerable, and be true to shared humanity. Use positive examples with the rate of at least 4-to-1.
      xxx/ellauri044.html on line 318: Dr. Burgo: That term gets thrown about too loosely, and sometimes it’s just a kind of name-calling. If you look at the DSM, Anti-Social Personality Disorder and Narcissistic Personality Disorder share many of the same features, which says to me that narcissism/sociopathy is actually a spectrum. A true sociopath is incapable of love but that doesn’t apply to everyone with narcissistic features.
      xxx/ellauri056.html on line 117: Myös seurueen rahat katoavat. Koko joukko päätyy Monrepoon kartanoon pidättyvän Sophie von Nicolayn vieraiksi. Lisää murhia tapahtuu, ja tapahtumat huipentuvat kuuluisalla Ludwigsteinin hautasaarella. Selviää muuten myös, mitä alkuperäiselle kartanon puistossa sijainneelle Väinämöisen patsaalle tapahtui…
      xxx/ellauri057.html on line 943: « Des idées, je n’en ai jamais eu. Je me suis intéressé aux hommes, à l’homme de la rue surtout, j’ai essayé de le comprendre d’une façon fraternelle… Qu'ai-je construit? Au fond, cela ne me regarde pas. »
      xxx/ellauri059.html on line 346: Shylock is sticking to his bond and to his word. He is true to his own code of conduct. Antonio signed that bond and promised that money, Shylock has been wronged; he has had his money stolen from him by his daughter and Lorenzo. However, Shylock is offered three times his money back and he still demands his pound of flesh; this moves him into the realms of villainy.
      xxx/ellauri059.html on line 360: But nothing could be further from the truth. It is true that Shakespeare presents Shylock as a bitter, Christian-hating, money-grabbing, stingy man, dressed in the gabardine that set Jews apart from other citizens, but he gives Shylock a strong reason for hating Christians and wanting to get revenge for how they have treated him and the Jewish community.
      xxx/ellauri068.html on line 219: So what did I do? I chose to remember that Borges is not a writer of the era of Facebook and autofiction; that it is not true that he hides in his texts, speaks little about himself (in fact, the opposite is true: how often in his work does his double appear, the character called Borges?); he simply does not do it the way in which we are accustomed today; that, like his friend Alfonso Reyes, Borges learned the classical notion of decorum, which is a set of rules of style when writing and also a certain principle of discretion, an obligation not to say absolutely everything that is very likely inconceivable to many people today.
      xxx/ellauri075.html on line 188: "He was the philosopher of my generation, which didn't succeed in realizing itself spiritually, but remained nostalgic about such a realization. Shestov [...] has played an important role in my life. [...] He thought rightly that the true problems escape the philosophers. What else do they do but obscuring the real torments of life?" (Emil Cioran: Oeuvres, Gallimard, Paris 1995, p. 1740, my translation (kuka oon tää 'mä?')]
      xxx/ellauri075.html on line 465: “American Psycho” author Bret Easton Ellis tore into the late author of the critically acclaimed “Infinite Jest” and “The Pale King” on Twitter last week, and in true Ellis fashion, he didn’t hold back.
      xxx/ellauri076.html on line 64: Track "Motley Crue" Yhtye "Motley Crue"
      xxx/ellauri084.html on line 374:

      Celiac sprue


      xxx/ellauri084.html on line 378: Celiac sprue, joka tunnetaan myös nimellä keliakia, gluteenille herkkä enteropatia ja gluteenin aiheuttama enteropatia, on krooninen ruuansulatuskanavan sairaus, joka häiritsee ravintoaineiden sulamista ja imeytymistä ruoasta.
      xxx/ellauri085.html on line 211: I feel like a lot of people have covered the ugly and probably the truest way of getting through it all. Alcohol, meds or marrying into a rich family so you can kick your fe... Read More »
      xxx/ellauri085.html on line 233: I thought wearing a sleek as suit, working in a Fortune 500 company is a dream come true.
      xxx/ellauri085.html on line 355: This has a two part answer. The first is, that it assumes that businesses are started and then expanded for the purpose of creating jobs and advancing the working class. This simply is not true. When a person opens a business, their entire purpose is to earn a profit. Not a single multimillionaire has ever said “I think we need more jobs and better wages, so I think we should open another facility.” This can be documented with the exodus of American business to coutries such as Mexico, China, and Japan, just to name a few. They were NOT trying to create jobs in those countries. They were trying to increase profits. There are any number of counties, cities, and states that are held hostage by big business demanding tax abatements and other concessions if they agree to do business and maybe create jobs in those areas. So you see, big business is not about helping the little guy…it is about how much profit they can make with a PROMISE to help the little guy.
      xxx/ellauri085.html on line 357: So here is what happens with the “Trickle Down Economics”…. Unlike the working class that, when they get an extra couple of hundred bucks immediately goes out and spends it and helps the entire economy, those at the top of the ladder tend to invest that money. So…. The “Trickle down Economics” theory says that if we give the top 1% more money, through tax breaks, tax credits, or even credits, they will then pass that money on to their employees and servants. This simply isn't true. If it were, they would already be sharing their profits with the working class.
      xxx/ellauri085.html on line 398: And that’s usually where that thought experiment ends. But let’s keep going with the scenario with low taxes, shall we? After a long time of this pattern, this sandwich shop might turn into a large chain. They’re above the struggle to survive that they started in, and other sandwich shops can’t easily take away a large portion of their customers. It becomes quite expensive to try and out-compete them. But competition is also expensive on their end. And then the owner of this shop starts to think “now wait a minute… I raise the starting wage of my workers and lower my prices, and then everyone else does the same, until eventually, I’m forced to do it again. But that second time, and every time afterwards, I’m not getting more customers or more efficient workers, I’m competing with the other companies to try to maintain what I already have, with less and less profit. And the same is true for everyone I’m competing with. What if I talked to all the other big chains in this area, and we all agreed to keep about the same starting wage and price? That way we ALL make more money.” And now those lower taxes have no effect on price or wages, all that extra money becomes profit.
      xxx/ellauri085.html on line 400: But profit increases the number of people they employ, right? Sometimes, but this becomes less and less true the bigger a business gets. If a business gets big enough, they might fill their niche completely. For a smaller business, expanding is often a good investment, but there comes a point where that’s not really going to make you that much more money. The people who want to go to your stores might already be going to your stores about as much as they want to, so you don’t need to hire anyone else, or open a new location. So now all that profit goes to…the people who own the company. If the company can’t make any more money by expanding, they usually decide that they just give all of their executives a raise.
      xxx/ellauri085.html on line 443: The stupidity of the trickle down slur is the notion that lower tax rates are somehow supposed to free up a little more rich peoples’ income to be put in to spending and investment to boost the economy. That’s as stupid as the leftist notion that we will all get rich doing each others laundry and it is put forward by the same people. It is tried and true that only the rich get rich by getting the poor to do their laundry, and clean their golden toilet seats.
      xxx/ellauri085.html on line 582: There are two prevalent theories people like to allude to, Demand Side (Keynesian) and Supply Side ( Championed bt Reagan and theorized by Laffler). Neither has worked well. They are just different approaches to solve the same problem. Sluggish economic growth. In truth, Reagan never really implemented true Trickle Down economics. His was a hybrid of tax cuts and simplification coupled with a massive increase in government spending. You see the thing is, when you have an unregulated job market and limited government employment, there will always be a segment of the population that will be out of work and large sections of the economy reinventing itself. The U.S. has reached virtually full employment since the 80’s.
      xxx/ellauri086.html on line 410: Despite being recognized as a novelist on an international scale, Ferrante has kept her identity secret since the 1992 publication of her first novel. Speculation as to her true identity has been rife, and several theories, based on information Ferrante has given in interviews as well as analysis drawn from the content of her novels, have been put forth.
      xxx/ellauri086.html on line 412: In October 2016, investigative reporter Claudio Gatti published an article jointly in Il Sole 24 Ore and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, that relied on financial records related to real estate transactions and royalties payments to draw the conclusion that Anita Raja, a Rome-based translator, is the real author behind the Ferrante pseudonym. Gatti's article was criticized by many in the literary world as a violation of privacy, though Gatti contends that "by announcing that she would lie on occasion, Ferrante has in a way relinquished her right to disappear behind her books and let them live and grow while their author remained unknown. Indeed, she and her publisher seemed to have fed public interest in her true identity." British novelist Matt Haig tweeted, "Think the pursuit to discover the 'real' Elena Ferrante is a disgrace and also pointless. A writer's truest self is the books they write." The writer Jeanette Winterson, in a Guardian article, denounced Gatti's investigations as malicious and sexist, saying "At the bottom of this so-called investigation into Ferrante's identity is an obsessional outrage at the success of a writer – female – who decided to write, publish and promote her books on her own terms." She went on to say that the desire to uncover Ferrante's identity constitutes an act of sexism in itself, and that "Italy is still a Catholic country with strong patriarchial attitudes towards women." Others responding to Gatti's article suggested that knowledge of Ferrante's biography is indeed relevant.
      xxx/ellauri086.html on line 430: And indeed you did. I thought that you would rue it; More to blackmail and swindle than teach;
      xxx/ellauri086.html on line 443: And indeed you did. I thought that you would rue it; He used to strip her mask away.
      xxx/ellauri086.html on line 630: Dupin says he had visited the minister at his hotel. Complaining of weak eyes he wore a pair of green spectacles, the true purpose of which was to disguise his eyes as he searched for the letter. In a cheap card rack hanging from a dirty ribbon, he saw a half-torn letter and recognized it as the letter of the story's title. Striking up a conversation with D— about a subject in which the minister is interested, Dupin examined the letter more closely. It did not resemble the letter the prefect described so minutely; the writing was different, and it was sealed not with the "ducal arms" of the S— family, but with D—'s monogram. Dupin noticed that the paper was chafed as if the stiff paper was first rolled one way and then another. Dupin concluded that D— wrote a new address on the reverse of the stolen one, re-folded it the opposite way and sealed it with his own seal.
      xxx/ellauri087.html on line 182: Esimerkit johdattavat aina kuitenkin Saarisen ulkopuolelle, meihin kuulijoihin. Ahtisaari-tarina kertoo siitä, miten hyvin entinen presidentti pystyy reagoimaan tilanteisiin, Vatas-juttu entisen ralliautoilijan kyvystä ottaa toiset ihmiset huomioon. Meidät ikään kuin kohotetaan mukaan samaan seurueeseen.
      xxx/ellauri091.html on line 294: Die versunkene Glocke (1897), a symbolic story of a master bell founder and his struggle as an artist, has been one of Hauptmann's most popular plays. After this Hauptmann wrote the tragedies Fuhrmann Henschel (1899), Michael Kramer (1900), and Rose Bernd (1903). These works also reflected the personal turmoil Hauptmann was then in he had fallen for a fourteen-year-old girl, a promising violinist Margarete Marschalk. She was the opposite of his wife, interested in his work, and in such outdoor sports as hiking, ice-skating, andf skiing. After Hauptmann wife found out about her rival, she moved with the children to Dresden. Hauptmann had a son, Benvenuto, with Margarete, and in 1904, after a long period of agonising thought, Hauptmann divorced Marie and married Margarete. However, a year later he met a sixteen-year-old actress, Ida Orloff, who became a new object of his obsession. Hauptmann described her in his letters as a moth flirting with flames, as a bewitching Siren, as a mermaid, and as a cruel spider.
      xxx/ellauri091.html on line 497: Even if you’re a true believer, why would you visit?
      xxx/ellauri091.html on line 792: Following the conference at The Hague, two delegations, one of them headed by Emily Balch, visited neutral and belligerent countries alike to submit their resolutions to the statesmen. A polite reception was accorded to them everywhere. This is not surprising, for the statesman is as a rule polite, perhaps especially so when dealing with women, but his true thoughts inevitably remain concealed behind his inscrutable smile. The women failed to make any headway with their proposals; and this was only to be expected with things as they were.
      xxx/ellauri104.html on line 240: True, but there's more to it than this. Schizophrenia is not caused by wisdom.
      xxx/ellauri113.html on line 341: Lääkärinä Pekka on vanha ateisti, mutta tuli toisiin aatoxiin luettuaan raamatusta, että se on totta. No tarkemmin sanoen herätys tulee kirjaimellisesti huomenna, jos ruetaan saarnaamaan että raamattu on kirjaimellisesti totta. Jokainen päivä on uusi eilinen, mutta optimistisesti ajatellen on se myös toissapäivän huominen. Arabit luultavasti kääntyvät rysähtämällä, koska sinne on tullut sanaa valtavasti radioaalloilla. Pekka oli ateisti koska uskoi hölmö miljardeihin vuosiin ja Darwiniin. Ei se on kyllä liian hidasta, Pekka haluu pikaista muutosta ja mieluummin eilen. Kun unohdetaan Darwin ja uskotaan vanhan testamentin aikatauluihin, nin herätys tulee heti eikä 15. päivä. Jeesus tulee! Hän on täällä tänään, tai viimeistään huomenna.
      xxx/ellauri113.html on line 502: How dense can these creation types really be? Wanting very much for something to be true turns people into imbeciles. The least one can say for Dawkins is that he knows what he doesn´t know. He his happy to just wait and see. One of my daughters challenged the teacher and said, “Miss, you keep saying ‘evolution did it,’ but you never actually explain how evolution did it.” The teacher had to confess that my daughter made a valid criticism, and the rest of class agreed. So what? How did god create the snake? Did he roll it like Gary Larson shows, or did he use some other method? Did he just make a hypnotic gesture? (Yes, see below.)
      xxx/ellauri114.html on line 287: Currently, the most popular view is that the complete fulfillment of Jeremiah’s prophecy is for our time and will take place shortly through Iran’s defeat in the Battle of Ezekiel 38. But if that’s true, then the Iranian people will have to be scattered among all the nations following their defeat and then somehow regain God’s favor during Daniel’s 70th Week in order for the last verse to be fulfilled. There’s simply no good reason to believe this will happen. After one brief reference in Ezekiel 38:5, the future of Persia is never mentioned in the Bible again.
      xxx/ellauri114.html on line 684: Despite the loss of the additional history of Manasseh and Ephraim, several modern-day groups claim descent from them, with varying levels of academic and rabbinical support. The Yusufzai tribe (literal translation The Sons of Joseph) of the Pashtuns of Afghanistan, India and Pakistan, who collectively refer to themselves as the "Bani Israel", have a long tradition connecting them to the exiled Kingdom of Israel. The Samaritans claim that some of their adherents are descended from these tribes, and many Persian Jews claim to be descendants of Ephraim. Many Samaritans claim descent from the grandchildren of Joseph under four main septs, his grandsons Danfi, Tsedakah, Mafraj and Sarawi Samaritans Museum In northeast India, the Mizo Jews claim descent from Manasseh, and call themselves Bnei Menashe; in 2005 Shlomo Amar, Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel, announced that he regarded this claim to be true, which under the Law of Return allows them to migrate to Israel, as long as they formally convert to Israel's Orthodox form of Judaism. Similar traditions are held by the Telugu Jews, in South India, who claim descent from Ephraim, and call themselves Bene Ephraim.
      xxx/ellauri116.html on line 387: Scholars and journalists often accuse de Beauvoir of publicly masking painful bouts of jealousy. While her inner emotional life is unclear, what’s evident is the manipulative, often dishonest, and arguably cruel treatment to which both Sartre and de Beauvoir subjected much-younger female consorts.
      xxx/ellauri116.html on line 393: Mikäs se nyt oli? Ainiin se 1700-luvun romaani, mulla taitaa olla se, vaikken ole lukenut. A French epistolary novel by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos, first published in four volumes by Durand Neveu from March 23, 1782. It is the story of the Marquise de Merteuil and the Vicomte de Valmont, two narcissistic rivals (and ex-lovers) who use seduction as a weapon to socially control and exploit others, all the while enjoying their cruel games and boasting about their talent for manipulation. It has been seen as depicting the corruption and depravity of the French nobility shortly before the French Revolution, and thereby attacking the Ancien Régime. The book has also been described as merely a story about two amoral people.
      xxx/ellauri120.html on line 80: The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, and our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of…It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind. (Lähde: Bernays; Propaganda)
      xxx/ellauri120.html on line 359: "Nam Sibyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla pendere, et cum illi pueri dicerent: Sibylla ti theleis; respondebat illa: apothanein thelo." I. THE BURIAL OF THE DEAD April is the cruellest month, breeding Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing Memory and desire, stirring Dull roots with spring rain. Winter kept us warm, covering Earth in forgetful snow, feeding A little life with dried tubers. Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade, And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten, 10 And drank coffee, and talked for an hour. Bin gar keine Russin, stamm’ aus Litauen, echt deutsch. And when we were children, staying at the archduke’s, My cousin’s, he took me out on a sled, And I was frightened. He said, Marie, Marie, hold on tight. And down we went. In the mountains, there you feel free. I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter. What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, 20 You cannot say, or guess, for you know only A heap of broken images, where the sun beats, And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief, And the dry stone no sound of water. Only There is shadow under this red rock, (Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust. 30 Frisch weht der Wind Der Heimat zu Mein Irisch Kind, Wo weilest du? "You gave me hyacinths first a year ago; "They called me the hyacinth girl." - Yet when we came back, late, from the Hyacinth garden, Your arms full, and your hair wet, I could not Speak, and my eyes failed, I was neither Living nor dead, and I knew nothing, 40 Looking into the heart of light, the silence. Öd’ und leer das Meer.
      xxx/ellauri121.html on line 492: Juonipaljastus: A true Christian is called to fight. Yet there are times devout followers of Christ unknowingly allow their warrior instincts to dull. Many of us stand idle while an evil tyrant (Joe Biden) pilfers our finances, snatches our health, filches our marriages, and makes off with all the promises of the kingdom—the really good stuff God intended for His children. Purchase.
      xxx/ellauri122.html on line 184: People are sarcastic when they say the opposite of the truth, or the opposite of their true feelings in order to be funny or to make a point. It is often thought that along with drinking tea and waiting in queues, winning colonial wars and losing football games, being racist pricks and dying in heaps of covid-19, the British have a fondness for sarcasm.
      xxx/ellauri122.html on line 220: Well if you read it on the Internet it must be true!
      xxx/ellauri122.html on line 770: Some books stay with you for a lifetime, the rest you just blithely walk by on your way to watching tv or cat videos or fling into garbage without so much as looking at the cover. Initially, they may seem to be just stories. As you will find, however, the literature grows and stays with you; they stay with you until you realise their true value: their capacity to alter and re-alter your idea of yourself, others, the society, and the world. Naah, the books on this list help you stay the way you are, keeping all your good old all American prejudices.
      xxx/ellauri122.html on line 814: An intriguing story in itself, its basis in tragic fact gives it a poignancy that makes it all the more powerful of a read. Forgot to mention, burning Dresden was just a wanton act of cruelty by the jealous yankees.
      xxx/ellauri122.html on line 987: cruelty toward Jews. While images of emaciation and mass
      xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1031: But is Barbie really that great of a role model? Was she really portraying true feminism or displaying the “right” way to look? Were these impressionable young girls learning an independent way of life or a body figure which should be modeled? If Barbie was paving the “new” way of life, then why was she so goddamn skinny? We liberated U.S. women weigh 3x more in our 10 gallon panties.
      xxx/ellauri123.html on line 664:
      The True Purpose of Rules & Principles

      xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1028: last meeting (the only time, as he ruefully minutes, that she ever calls him
      xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1045: Many a true word is spoken in jest, especially about the kinship between eros and thanatos. FUCK! KILL! Puuttuu enää EAT! The two closest glimpses Humbert gives us of his own self-hatred are not without their death wish—made explicit in the closing paragraphs—and their excremental aspects: "I am lanky, big-boned, wooly-chested Humbert Humbert, with thick black eyebrows and a queer accent, and a cesspoolful of rotting monsters behind his slow boyish smile." Two hundred pages later: "The turquoise blue swimming pool some distance behind the lawn was no longer behind that lawn, but within my thorax, and my organs swam in it like excrements in the blue sea water in Nice." And then there's the offhand aside "Since (as the psychotherapist, as well as the rapist, will tell you) the limits and rules of such girlish games are fluid …" in which it takes a moment to notice that "therapist" and "the rapist" are in direct apposition.
      xxx/ellauri124.html on line 121: Sexinukke tahtoo perheenjäsenexi, sanoo Miesten kauneus ja terveys -lehti. Ei ihme että vastapuoli alkaa olla kauhuissaan. "Hän olisi voinut jättää mut mut he is true to me" lohduttautuu eräs 36v naimisissa ollut ei-nukkevaimo kun äijä puuhastelee 3 sexinuken kanssa autotallissa.
      xxx/ellauri124.html on line 139: She said: "If he really wanted to he could have gone out and found someone else but he didn't do that, he was true to me."
      xxx/ellauri124.html on line 250: Tiesitkö että itkunauruemoji on Z-sukupolven keskuudessa auttamattoman nolo?
      xxx/ellauri124.html on line 437:

      The True Meaning Behind Each Hand Emoji


      xxx/ellauri125.html on line 795: After Hole's world tour concluded in 1996, Love made a return to acting, first in small roles in the Jean-Michel Basquiat biopic Basquiat and the drama Feeling Minnesota (1996), and then a starring role as Larry Flynt's wife Althea in Miloš Forman's critically acclaimed 1996 film The People vs. Larry Flynt. Love went through rehabilitation and quit using heroin at the insistence of Forman; she was ordered to take multiple urine tests under the supervision of Columbia Pictures while filming, and passed all of them. Despite Columbia Pictures' initial reluctance to hire Love due to her troubled past, her performance received acclaim, earning a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actress, and a New York Film Critics Circle Award for Best Supporting Actress. Critic Roger Ebert called her work in the film "quite a performance; Love proves she is not a rock star pretending to act, but a true actress."
      xxx/ellauri127.html on line 114: Only now, 40 years after his death, are some critics daring to suggest that many of his 18 novels are mediocre at best and that his masterpiece, “Lolita,” is a gruesome celebration of pedophile rape. Moreover the cherubic writer known to us from famous Life magazine photo shoots, jauntily brandishing his butterfly net in the Tetons or the Alps, proves to be a nasty piece of work. Distasteful people can do wonderful work — Pablo Picasso was no walk in the park — but their art doesn’t excuse their obnoxious behavior.
      xxx/ellauri127.html on line 504: 13. Nathan interprets Coleman’s choosing to reject his past and create a new identity for himself as “the drama that underlies America’s story, the high drama that is upping and leaving—and the energy and cruelty that rapturous drive demands,” whereas Walter thinks of his brother as a “calculating liar,” a “heartless son,” and a “traitor to his race” [p. 342]. Which of these views seems closer to the truth? Are they both legitimate? What is Ernestine’s position?
      xxx/ellauri127.html on line 819: I love thee true. Mä tykkään susta kyllä.
      xxx/ellauri128.html on line 133: Fils d’un riche chapelier de Dinan, Duclos était destiné à reprendre les affaires de son père mais c’était un enfant doué d’une vive intelligence et d’une grande mémoire et sa mère, devenue veuve, décida de l’envoyer achever ses études à Paris. Il suivit d’abord les cours de l’académie que tenait, rue de Charonne, l’abbé de Dangeau, puis du collège d'Harcourt où il entreprit l’étude du droit en vue de devenir avocat. Mais il se laissa aller à la dissipation, s’appliquant surtout à l’étude des armes, avant de décider de se consacrer aux lettres. Il fréquenta le café Procope et le café Gradot, où l’on ne tarda pas à le remarquer pour l’agrément et le piquant de sa conversation.
      xxx/ellauri129.html on line 656: The jury took only seven minutes to find in Elizabeth's favor. She was legally declared sane, and Judge Charles Starr, who had changed the trial from one about habeas corpus to one about sanity, issued an order that she should not be confined. "Scholar" Kathryn Burns-Howard quipped: "We will never know Elizabeth's true mental state or the details of her family life."
      xxx/ellauri130.html on line 174: Marcion of Sinope (/ˈmɑːrʃən, -ʃiən, -siən/; Greek: Μαρκίων [note 1] Σινώπης; c. 85 – c. 160) was an early Christian theologian, an evangelist, and an important figure in early Christianity.Marcion preached that the benevolent God of the Gospel who sent Jesus Christ into the world as the savior was the true Supreme Being, different from and opposed to the malevolent demiurge or creator god, identified with the Hebrew God of the Old Testament. He considered himself a follower of Paul the Apostle, whom he believed to have been the only true apostle of Jesus Christ, a doctrine called Marcionism. Marcion published the earliest extant fixed collection of New Testament books, making him a vital figure in the development of Christian history.[citation needed] Early Church Fathers such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Tertullian denounced Marcion as a heretic, and he was excommunicated by the church of Rome around 144. He published the first known canon of Christian sacred scriptures, which contained ten Pauline epistles (the Pastoral epistles weren't included) and a shorter version of the Gospel of Luke (the Gospel of Marcion). This made him a catalyst in the process of the development of the New Testament canon by forcing the proto-orthodox Church to respond to his canon. Varmaan Marcion oli sitten yhtä persepää kuin Puovoli.
      xxx/ellauri134.html on line 392: Talent: autonomy, ambition, being true to one’s soul
      xxx/ellauri134.html on line 405: Goal: to make dreams come true
      xxx/ellauri136.html on line 181: But to answer your question: I do have some personal rules like all my main characters can’t wear glasses ‘cause that’s geeky and I’m geeky (I also wear glasses). But another one is that the main character has to be a smoker. That’s not so true anymore, so I broke that one.
      xxx/ellauri137.html on line 753: While the immersed-in-Japan aspect of the book was well-researched and interesting (and accurate, as far as I could tell), the mystery and romance were not so well-done. For one thing, it was hard to care about the woman who got murdered, since we only saw her once and she wasn't that nice or interesting, and it wasn't clear why the protagonist cared enough about her to go and investigate the whole thing. Maybe it was the money. In addition, cliched attempts on the protagonists life seemed unrealistic, and when we finally discovered who the murderer was, it felt more like a random pulling of a number out of a hat than the one true solution.
      xxx/ellauri137.html on line 781: This makes sense...the author herself moved to Japan and taught English, and so in some ways I imagine that Ms. Massey has poured many of her pet peeves straight on the paper, showing that true experience often adds magic to fiction.
      xxx/ellauri139.html on line 205: As the beginning of the conclusion shows, the end to the novel can hardly be considered a happy one. In most cases, whatever positive transformations the characters underwent through their friendship with Myshkin unravel, either because they were unable to sustain the wisdom they learned from him or because they were so traumatized by the cruel absurdity of their life that they are reduced to a state of helplessness.
      xxx/ellauri139.html on line 330: Within the castle, Madeline, one of the main characters of this story is stuck dancing amongst the guests. She has been informed by older women that this is a night during which a virgin lady, after following certain rituals, might in her dreams see the image of her true love. She is distracted by these thoughts and unable to enjoy the dance.
      xxx/ellauri139.html on line 332: Farther away from the castle a man, Porphyro, who loves Madeline more than anything, is making his way to the house. He enters, unseen. If anyone finds him he knows that he will be killed. Madeline’s family hates him and holds his lineage against him. While sneaking through the house he comes upon Angela, one of the servants. He begs her to bring him to Madeline’s chamber so that he might show himself to her that night and solidify himself as her true love. After much complaining, she agrees and hides him until it is time.
      xxx/ellauri139.html on line 336: After much convincing Madeline realizes her mistake. Porphyro declares that the two should run away together, since now she knows he is her true love, and escape to a home he has prepared on the “southern moors.” They need to go now while the house is asleep so that her family does not murder him.
      xxx/ellauri139.html on line 517: “A cruel man and impious thou art: Julma mies ja hävytön! etkö olla saata
      xxx/ellauri139.html on line 748: “Cruel! what traitor could thee hither bring? lootaan, on pussit tyhjät ja vaalenee jo itä,
      xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1045: Kun hän lähti Avonista vuonna 1828 (esipuheessaan Hégésippen kerätyille teoksille, Sainte-Beuve ilmoittaa meille, että Hégésippe oli erinomainen klassisen kirjallisuuden opiskelija ja että hänellä oli lahjakkuus latinalaiseen tulkintaan), hän aloitti oppisopimuskoulutuksen oikolukijana Provinsin kustantaja, monsieur Lebeau - Hégésippe viittaa teoksissaan M. Lebeaun tyttäreen "sisarekseen" ja hän omisti lyhyet proosakertomuksensa hänelle. Kun Kaarle X kulki Provinsin läpi vuonna 1828, Sainte-Beuve ilmoittaa meille, Moreau kirjoitti isänmaallisen runonsa Vive le roi! . Hégésippe Moreau meni Pariisiin ennen vuotta 1830. M.Lebrunin neuvosta hän lähetti kopion kirjeestään painamisesta M. Firmin Didotille, ja hänet palkattiin Didot -kustantamolla, joka sijaitsi rue Jacobilla, mutta lähti tämä työnantaja pian sen jälkeen. Hän osallistui heinäkuun vallankumoukseen 1830, työskenteli lyhyesti opettajana ( maître d'étude ) ja alkoi johtaa Böömin elämää.
      xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1075: Né le 28 frimaire an XII (20 décembre 1803) sous le Consulat, à Lyon, 62 rue Pas Étroit (actuelle rue du Bât-d'Argent), Pierre François Lacenaire est le quatrième enfant et le deuxième fils de Jean-Baptiste Lacenaire, bourgeois et négociant lyonnais, et de Marguerite Gaillard, qui connaît treize grossesses entre 1799 et 1809. Kyllä meni kesken kovasti, jopa riitti Jean-Baptistella yritystä siementää. Non désiré de ses parents, il souffre de se voir préférer son frère aîné Jean-Louis, né le 19 frimaire an VIII (10 décembre 1799), il a notamment un sentiment d'abandon de sa mère et sera spolié de son héritage par son père.
      xxx/ellauri148.html on line 175: It should not come to one’s mind that in the days of the Messiah anything in the customary order of the world will be annulled, or that there will be something new in the order of Creation. For the world will continue in its path. And that which Isaiah said, the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid (Isa. 11:6), is but an allegory and a riddle. The true meaning of it is that Israel will dwell in safety with the wicked of the idolaters who are likened to a wolf and a leopard….And all of them will return to faith of truth, and they will neither rob nor despoil, but will eat the things which are permitted, in pleasure, together with Israel, as it is written, The lion shall eat straw like the ox (Isa. 11:7). And likewise, all the similar things said about the Messiah are but allegories. And in the days of the Messiah it will become known to everybody what thing the allegory signified and to what thing it alluded.
      xxx/ellauri148.html on line 524: Song of Solomon 7:11-12. Latin text. Veni, dilecte mi, egrediamur in agrum, commoremur in villis, mane surgamus ad vineas, videamus si floruit vinea, si flores fructus parturiunt, si floruerunt mala punica: ibi dabo tibi ubera mea.
      xxx/ellauri154.html on line 48: - Mutta juuri kun tamma syöxyy sisään, käy tuo kadotuxen ori sen kimppuun, nousee selkään, syleilee 2 kavioin, puristaa, murjoo ja siinä samalla sotkee ja jauhaa Cochegruen muodottomaxi möhkäleexi, möyheäxi kuin pähkinänsydän, josta öljy on puserrettu pois.

      xxx/ellauri154.html on line 144: D'après les Vies de saint Denis, écrites à l'époque carolingienne et faisant suite à l'invention de l'abbé de Saint-Denis, Hilduin, incarcérés dans l'île de Lutèce, Denis et ses diacres, saint Eleuthère et saint Rustique, empruntèrent les chemins, qui seront nommés rue Montmartre, rue du Faubourg-Montmartre et rue des Martyrs, pour gagner la butte Montmartre où ils sont décapités.
      xxx/ellauri157.html on line 56: Women need flight points in order to find again the true essence of themselves. The acquisitive instinct is compatible with true appreciation of beauty.
      xxx/ellauri157.html on line 60: It isn't for the moment you are struck that you need courage, but for that long uphill climb back to sanity and faith and financial security. Only in growth, reform, and change, paradoxically enough, is true financial security to be found.
      xxx/ellauri157.html on line 100: Like Rubens, Jordaens painted altarpieces, mythological, and allegorical scenes, and after 1640—the year Rubens died—he was the most important painter in Antwerp for large-scale commissions and the status of his patrons increased in general. However, he is best known today for his numerous large genre scenes based on proverbs in the manner of his contemporary Jan Brueghel the Elder, depicting The King Drinks and As the Old Sing, So Pipe the Young. Jordaens' main artistic influences, besides Rubens and the Brueghel family, were northern Italian painters such as Jacopo Bassano, Paolo Veronese, and Caravaggio.
      xxx/ellauri157.html on line 220: The Baal Shem Tov taught that a superior advantage would accrue in Jewish service with incorporating materialism within spirituality. In Hasidic thought, this was possible because of the essential Divine inspiration within Hasidic expression. In its terminology, it takes a higher Divine source to unify lower expressions of the material and the spiritual. In relation to the Omnipresent Divine essence, the transcendent emanations described in historical Kabbalah are external. This corresponds to the Kabbalistic difference between the Or (Light) and the Maor (Luminary). Essential Divinity permeates all equally, from the common folk to the scholars. Well, perhaps a little fuzzy, but the main point is that everyone can participate in the fun.
      xxx/ellauri157.html on line 250: The strategic advantage of Hasidism over Kabbalah is its ability to get by without the esoteric terms of Kabbalah. This is brought out most in the anecdotes told about the beloved Masters of Hasidism, as well as in the funny parables they told to illustrate ideas. One such parable differentiates between superficial forms of love of God and spiritual reward, with true forms of selfless love:
      xxx/ellauri157.html on line 449: Rabbi Nachman of Breslau (1772–1810) reminds us, in the same way that breaking is an inevitability, fixing is also an inevitability. We know the former is true; we don’t always believe the latter.Rabbi Nachman knew a thing or two about brokenness. His Hasidic tales often circle around characters who face their darkest moments and search profoundly for redemption. He authored a quote that became a famous Jewish song: “The entire world is a very narrow bridge. The key in crossing is not to be afraid. Only someone who has seen fear and overcome it could write these words.
      xxx/ellauri157.html on line 538: Like a true nature's child
      xxx/ellauri157.html on line 555: Like a true nature's child
      xxx/ellauri165.html on line 338: Upon arrival in London on 8 November, the three of them took suites at Nerot's Hotel after a missed communication from Nelson to his wife about receiving the party at their home, Roundwood. Lady Nelson and Nelson's father arrived and they all dined at the hotel, with Fanny deeply unhappy to see Emma pregnant. The affair soon became public knowledge, and to the delight of the newspapers, Fanny did not accept the affair as placidly as Sir William. Emma was winning the media war at that point, and every fine lady was experimenting with her look. Nelson contributed to Fanny's misery by being cruel to her when not in Emma's company. Sir William was mercilessly lampooned in the press, but his sister observed that he doted on Emma and she was very attached to him.
      xxx/ellauri165.html on line 706: One true faith
      xxx/ellauri166.html on line 219: “This is spoken of God,” says Dr. Dodd, “after the manner of men, to denote his utter contempt of the opposition of his enemies; the perfect ease with which he was able to disappoint all their measures, and crush them for their impiety and folly; together with his absolute security, that his counsels should stand and his measures be finally accomplished; as men laugh at, and hold in utter contempt, those whose malice and power they know to be utterly vain and impotent. The introducing God as thus laughing at, and deriding his enemies, is in the true spirit of poetry, and with the utmost propriety and dignity.
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 105: Are we to rue that upward from the sod Pitääkö meidän katua että takapakasta
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 441: In January 1800, Thomas Jefferson received a copy of Abbé Augustin Barruel ‘s Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism and also commented on the book in a letter to Bishop James Madison.
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 492: “I should be very happy in your Excellency’s good Opinion, that the Contagion of Illuminatism or Jacobinism had not yet reached this Country; but when I consider the anarchical and seditious Spirit, that shewed itself in the United States from the Time M. Genet and Fauchet (who certainly is of the Order) arrived in this Country and propagated their seditious Doctrines, which the illuminated Doctor from Birmingham has been zealously employed to strengthen, I confess I cannot divest myself of my Suspicions: yet I trust that the Alwise and Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe will so dispose the Minds of the People of these United States that true Religion and righteous Government may remain the Privileges of this Nation!
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 525: I have lately by accident got a sight of a single volume (the 3d.) of the Abbe Barruel’s `Antisocial conspiracy,’ which gives me the first idea I have ever had of what is meant by the Illuminatism against which `illuminate Morse’ as he is now called, & his ecclesiastical & monarchical associates have been making such a hue and cry.
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 527: Barruel’s own parts of the book are perfectly the ravings of a Bedlamite.
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 528: But he quotes largely from Wishaupt whom he considers as the founder of what he calls the order. As you may not have had an opportunity of forming a judgment of this cry of `mad dog’ which has been raised against his doctrines, I will give you the idea I have formed from only an hour’s reading of Barruel’s quotations from him, which you may be sure are not the most favorable.
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 530: Wishaupt seems to be an enthusiastic Philanthropist. He is among those (as you know the excellent Price and Priestley also are) who believe in the indefinite perfectibility of man. He thinks he may in time be rendered so perfect that he will be able to govern himself in every circumstance so as to injure none, to do all the good he can, to leave government no occasion to exercise their powers over him, & of course to render political government useless. This you know is Godwin’s doctrine, and this is what Robinson, Barruel & Morse had called a conspiracy against all government.
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 536: He believes the Free masons were originally possessed of the true principles & objects of Christianity, & have still preserved some of them by tradition, but much disfigured. The means he proposes to effect this improvement of human nature are `to enlighten men, to correct their morals & inspire them with benevolence. Secure of our success, sais he, we abstain from violent commotions. To have foreseen the happiness of posterity & to have prepared it by irreproachable means, suffices for our felicity.
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 540: As Wishaupt lived under the tyranny of a despot & priests, he knew that caution was necessary even in spreading information, & the principles of pure morality. He proposed therefore to lead the Free masons to adopt this object & to make the objects of their institution the diffusion of science & virtue. He proposed to initiate new members into his body by gradations proportioned to his fears of the thunderbolts of tyranny. This has given an air of mystery to his views, was the foundation of his banishment, the subversion of the masonic order, & is the colour for the ravings against him of Robinson, Barruel & Morse, whose real fears are that the craft would be endangered by the spreading of information, reason, & natural morality among men.
      xxx/ellauri167.html on line 627: The religion has been likened to Zen based on similarities with absurdist interpretations of the Rinzai school, as well as Taoist philosophy. Discordianism is centered on the idea that both order and disorder are illusions imposed on the universe by the human nervous system, and that neither of these illusions of apparent order and disorder is any more accurate or objectively true than the other.
      xxx/ellauri170.html on line 966: Perhaps we do not give these scientists enough credit for the faith they possess. Yes, to believe in this type of human evolution takes a whole lot of faith. Sadly, their faith is placed in the wrong location and in an untrue process. If only they were able to place that faith in the real designer behind the design. I believe it is imperative we educate ourselves and teach this generation as Paul warned Timothy to “keep that which is committed to your trust, avoiding oppositions of science falsely so called” (1 Timothy 6:20). So I'm simplifying the quote, but I don't care. Evolution is not science. It is a theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation” (dictionary.com).
      xxx/ellauri174.html on line 501: Flores apparuerunt in terra nostra, minä olen kaunis!
      xxx/ellauri174.html on line 655: The Marmite de Papin: A True Kitchen Antique: When I was in Paris a couple of weeks ago I visited the Musée des Arts et Métiers, the museum of arts and trades. (Really one of the most interesting museums I've ever been to!) And while I was there I saw many things of interest to cooks, but especially this: The Marmite de Papin. Do you know what it is? The very, very first pressure cooker!Well, a model of the first pressure cooker, anyway.
      xxx/ellauri176.html on line 71: There are also arguments for the veracity of the disrobing. The words "a prophetess and priestess of Aphrodite" might have indicated that Phryne participated in the Aphrodisia festival on Aegina. If true, this would have showed the jurors that she was favored by the goddess and deserving of "pity". Also, it was accepted at the time that women were especially capable of evoking the sympathy of the judges. Mothers and children could be brought to courts for such purposes. The baring of breasts was not restricted or atypical for prostitutes or courtesans, and could be used to arouse compassion as well as "pity".
      xxx/ellauri176.html on line 170: Et le merveilleux Paradou du roman, ce paradis panthéiste, cet hymne à la nature, à l'amour – ces paysages décrits par Zola perdent toute vibration, toute poésie. On croit voir défiler les pages du catalogue Vilmorin où s'ébattent Serge et une Albine issue du Petit Echo de la Mode. Le film projeté ne montre pas la séquence du grenier, la découvert des toilettes féminines – les nombreux changements de robe d'Albine sont, dès lors, gratuits, irritants. Comme tous les autres acteurs, Gillian Hills (Albine) est mal dirigée, elle n'a aucune grâce, aucun naturel. Francis Huster (Serge), lui, a du charisme mais son dur combat, sa douceur sont hélas surtout perceptibles par le fard qui rantôt ranime, tantôt creuse un visage que des zooms inutiles amènent en gros plan. Et pour avoir voulu donner aux paysages de la Sainte-Baume, du Lubéron, du Parc Floral d'Orléans une certaine unité, on aboutit à des tonalités froides, éteintes. Seules les intérieurs (l'église, la chambre de Serge, la salle à manger de la cure) gardent leurs contrastes, leurs valeurs. Les personnages n'existent guère, aucune vibration n'émane d'eux, ni de la nature cruelle ou triomphante, de ce Paradou, terre-mère bruissante de vie, féconde.
      xxx/ellauri176.html on line 249: Dans leurs éclairs cruels et dans leurs pâleurs mates, Julman kirkkaana ja matan kalpeana.
      xxx/ellauri176.html on line 348: Nuit blanche de glaçons et de neige cruelle ! Jään ja julman lumen valkoinen yö!
      xxx/ellauri176.html on line 433: Sattuu vain olemaan niin että Jumala ei suostu asettumaan tärkkelyxeen. Vaikka mahtuisihan se, kun kerta mahtui ahtaasta immenkalvon reijästä Maarian munasolun sisään. Syntyperäisen aristokratian oli korvannut rahan aristokratia: kassojen kalifikunta, rue du Sentier'n sortovalta ja kaupan tyrannia, jota rahanahneet ja ahdasmieliset aatteet ja itserakkaat ja luihut vaistot pitivät suitsissaan.
      xxx/ellauri178.html on line 76: Mixture of kindness and cruelty. Juutalaista menoa, ihan kuin Jehova. Anna Steiger muka löi ja potki äiskyä nimellä "kike bitch". (Rod Steiger oli goy.) Ritarillinen Roth puuttui asiaan ja kielti käyttämästä sellaista kieltä äidistä. Kike se oli izekin. Sen se ottikin izeensä. Siitä lähtien se ja Anna oli enemyjä kuin David ja filistealaiset. Annasta tuli oopperalaulaja. Roth muutti ulos muttei Lontoosta koska se oli vuokrannut molemmat kämppänsä ja oli muka vieläkin "hopelessly devoted to you". Mutta renting an apt in London would have disastrous tax consequences, advised an American lawyer. Phil oli varsinainen Shylock. I´m not going to be defeated by this kid, se murisi kuin karhu erauspennulle. Annalle tehtiin oma koppi pimeästi Clairen huoneiston nurkkaan (Clairen rahoilla). Säästyihän sekin penni.
      xxx/ellauri179.html on line 193: The conventional view is that Hemingway’s true “religion” — insofar as he can be said to have one at all — is his famous “Cod”: that in order to give meaning to life, one had to live by some set of ethical principles.
      xxx/ellauri179.html on line 319:
      Minähän sen oravan myrkytin. Jeopardizing wild life is to be true to one’s own nature.

      xxx/ellauri179.html on line 823: Our Lord Jesus Christ does not stand for peace at any price...Every true American would rather see this land face war than see her flag lowered in dishonor...I wish to say that, not only from the standpoint of a citizen, but from the standpoint of a minister of religion...I believe there is nothing that would be of such great practical benefit to us as universal military training for the men of our land.
      xxx/ellauri179.html on line 868: But we lived on the square, like a true-married pair, me asuttiin torin varrella kuin parina,
      xxx/ellauri179.html on line 904: An’ she told ’em true! ja se kertoi toden sanan:
      xxx/ellauri186.html on line 182:
      1. True happiness is to avoid duties from gods and men; to enjoy the present with optimistic expectations on stocks and futures; to amuse ourselves with conjunctures, and never to rest satisfied with what we have, which is abundantly sufficient only if sufficiently abundant (viz never).
        xxx/ellauri186.html on line 187:
      2. One of the most beautiful qualities of true friendship is to be understood and obeyed.
        xxx/ellauri186.html on line 311: Days later, Karen and Lorene coincidentally stand next to each other on a ship going to the mainland. Karen tosses her leis into the sea wondering if she will ever return to Hawaii. Lorene tells Karen she is not returning and that her "fiancé", whom she identifies as Prewitt, died heroically during the Pearl Harbor attack and was awarded a silver star (none of which is true). Karen recognizes the name, but says nothing.
        xxx/ellauri186.html on line 462: But they are cruel tears: this sorrow's heavenly;
        xxx/ellauri186.html on line 586: Truth, not cruel to a friend; Totuus, joka on kiltti ystävälle,
        xxx/ellauri186.html on line 637: Which one is true? We simply do not know for sure. The facts about his death have not been historically proven, beyond a reasonable doubt. In fact, there is no historical consensus on the person of Matthew. There are several conflicting accounts, and the Greek text does not state anywhere he was an eyewitness (and therefore a disciple). Maybe he was a fake. The problem is the gospel of Matthew is anonymous: the author is not named within the oldest surviving text, and the superscription "according to Matthew" was added some time in the second century, although the gospel doesn't state it's an eyewitness account. The historically very likely incorrect tradition that the author was the disciple Matthew begins with the early Christian bishop Papias of Hierapolis.
        xxx/ellauri186.html on line 695: In the seventh century, a brand new monotheistic religion grew out of the flames of rampant, Arabian paganism. A man by the name of Mohammad is said to have begun receiving direct revelations via the angel Gabriel (the same guy who knocked up Anne and Mary!) about the timely reform of the true religion. The religion of Islam was born out of Mohammad’s revelations from Allah. The Quran, the record of those revelations and the holy book of Islam, contains various statements concerning Jesus Christ (known as Isa ibn Maryam or Jesus the son of Mary within the religion). Esa Saarisen äiti on (tai oli?) Iisa, eikä "Esa"-kaan ole siitä kaukana. Mitähän tämä mahtaa merkitä? Onko (tai oliko?) se enne? Eskiltäkin vuosi verta kylkihaavasta.
        xxx/ellauri186.html on line 746: Christianity, and especially Judeo-Christianity. Thus the Quran alludes repeatedly to the content of the Pentateuch and the Gospels. But while it is true that more Quranic material is classifiable as “Judaic” or “Christian” than as specifically “Judeo-Christian,” nonetheless the influence of the later is central; for whereas the “Judaic” and “Christian” material consists of references to “known facts,” or allusions to, and occasional retellings of, stories and legends, the Judeo-Christian material shaped the theology of the Quran.
        xxx/ellauri187.html on line 83: Corbett’s chapters alternate between poet and sculptor until the pair converge, when the ambitious yet unremarkable Rilke, again in search of a master, travels to Paris to write his monograph on Rodin. Even at this early stage, he was one of many Rodin’s true believers.
        xxx/ellauri187.html on line 117: Rilke loved absolutely, not strenuously or patiently, and therefore his love always froze up into a mirror of itself. His condition might have been tormented and tormenting--it might appear wearily obnoxious. But for Rilke the poet, modern men and women as lovers--their exalted expectations and their comi-tragic desperation--came to symbolize complex human fate in a world where vertiginous possibilities have replaced God and nature. In Rilke's Elegies especially, lovers encounter animals, trees, flowers, works of art, puppets, and angels--all images, for Rilke, of the absolute fulfillment of desire, alongside which the poet placed the tender vaudeville of imperfect human wanting. Rilke the man might have presented a painful obstruction to himself. But true ardor often springs from an essential deprivation.
        xxx/ellauri193.html on line 215: Crimes of passion are often committed against women due to beliefs about female sexuality and are often present in societies dominated by strong double standards related to male and female sexual behaviors, particularly related to premarital sex and adultery. Indeed, with regard to adultery, many societies, such as Latin American countries, have been dominated by very strong double standards regarding male and female adultery, with the latter being seen as a much more serious violation. Such ideas were also supported by laws in the West; for example, in the UK, before 1923, a man could divorce solely on the wife's adultery, but a woman had to prove additional fault (eg. adultery and cruelty). Similarly, passion defenses to domestic murders were often available to men who killed unfaithful wives, but not to women who killed unfaithful husbands (France's crime of passion law, that was in force until 1975, is an example).
        xxx/ellauri193.html on line 408: I was ready to chuck Nadine until I read that she was a commie and sided with the Philistines on the Arab-Israeli conflict. But she didn't boycott the pen pal meeting dammit! The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) strongly criticized South African author Nadine Gordimer for ignoring calls to boycott the Israeli-hosted International Writers' Festival. Oh Nadine, why can't you be true! She went to this pen pal meeting in Israel 2009 and said:
        xxx/ellauri193.html on line 814: Van der Westhuizen continues to say that murders in South Africa are not racially motivated, as some (many?) people believe. Farm and house murders are sometimes horribly cruel but according to him he has never encountered a clear racial motive in court. For him, murderers kill mostly out of greed, jealousy, passion, and during gang wars. Also because of poverty and the despondency and drunkenness that accompany it, but not because of racial hatred. The whiteys just happen to have more of the wherewithal. From 1990 to 2017 there were 1938 murders on farms (of which 137 were farm workers). Of the victims, 88% were white and 12% black.
        xxx/ellauri195.html on line 197: Bosham in West Sussex also claims to be the site of this episode, as does Gainsborough in Lincolnshire. As Gainsborough is inland, if the story is true then Canute would have been trying to turn back the tidal bore known as the aegir. Another tradition places this episode on the north coast of the Wirral, which at the time was part of Mercia.
        xxx/ellauri200.html on line 727: from mirrored truth the likeness of the True. Peilaamaan totta todenkaltaisuudella.
        xxx/ellauri202.html on line 220: Mme Arman de Caillavet lui inspire Thaïs (1890) et Le Lys rouge (1894). Après une ultime dispute avec son épouse, qui ne supporte pas cette liaison, France quitte le domicile conjugal de la rue Chalgrin, un matin de juin 1892, et envoie une lettre de séparation à son épouse12. Le divorce est prononcé à ses torts et dépens, le 2 août 1893.
        xxx/ellauri202.html on line 234: La loi, dans un grand souci d'égalité, interdit aux riches comme aux pauvres de coucher sous les ponts, de mendier dans les rues et de voler du pain.
        xxx/ellauri202.html on line 346: Hitler would later insist that Johann Georg Hiedler — the man who married Schicklgruber in 1842 — was his paternal grandfather. Hiedler died in 1857, so he clearly wasn’t able to fully back up this claim for the Third Reich. Although Nazi Germany apparently accepted the story, many modern historians have debated whether it was actually true.
        xxx/ellauri202.html on line 348: To this day, the true identity of Hitler’s paternal grandfather remains unknown. So amidst the ongoing mystery, Frank suggested that Alois’s father was the 19-year-old son of Schicklgruber’s employer, Frankenberger Sr.
        xxx/ellauri202.html on line 352: But was Frank’s account true? Let's have closer look at a controversial claim!
        xxx/ellauri202.html on line 361: But in Nazi Germany, the leaders came up with their own anti-Semitic definition of a Vierteljude, or “Quarter Jew.” And this was someone who simply had one Jewish grandparent. So according to Hitler’s own rules, he would indeed be considered a quarter Jewish — if Frank’s claim was true.
        xxx/ellauri208.html on line 573: Land of the true Tosien maa
        xxx/ellauri208.html on line 582: Land of the true Tosien maa
        xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1057: Tablet I continues with legends about overpopulation and plagues, mentioning Atra-Hasis only at the end. Tablet II begins with more human overpopulation. To reduce this population, Enlil sends famine and drought at formulaic intervals of 1200 years. Accordingly, in this epic, Enlil is depicted as a cruel, capricious god, while Enki is depicted as kind and helpful, perhaps because priests of Enki were writing and copying the story. Enki can be seen to have parallels to Prometheus, in that he is seen as man's benefactor and defies the orders of the other gods when their intentions are malicious towards humans. Tablet II remains mostly damaged, but it ends with Enlil's decision to destroy humankind with a flood, with Enki bound by oath to keep this plan secret.
        xxx/ellauri215.html on line 394: "And this brings me to my conclusion. I’m a strong believer in academic freedom (BUAHAHAHA, stop, you're killing me!) and open debate. I’m somewhat worried coming from a country that lives next to Russia and have been attacked by the Soviet Union and had to survive WW2 as a Soviet neighbor and have had to lose my summerhouse in Porckala to the Soviet Union, that academics make claims that simply are untrue and it doesn’t help if you quote documentation and skew it in a certain direction… more important than international relations theory is the reality of what is happening on the ground.
        xxx/ellauri215.html on line 442: WEDNESDAY, April 13, 2022 (HealthDay News) -- The more orgasms you have, the more you come to expect. And the reverse is also true, according to a new study of the so-called orgasm gap -- in which men climax far more often than their female partners. Haha of course, when the male comes, its GAME OVER, and it takes just 5 to 40 thrusts! "Our expectations are shaped by our experiences, so when women orgasm less, they will desire and expect to orgasm less," said study author Grace Wetzel, a doctoral student in social psychology at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J. "If women lower their expectations in this way, the more orgasm inequality may perpetuate in relationship," she said in a Rutgers news release. What else is new? How many times female orgasm is mentioned in Talmud?
        xxx/ellauri218.html on line 36: src="https://uploads6.wikiart.org/images/pieter-bruegel-the-elder/the-triumph-of-death.jpg" width="100%" />
        xxx/ellauri218.html on line 54: 1. Teoksen nimi on Kuoleman voittokulku. Se on vuosilta 1560-1562. Teos on öljymaalaus, joka on tehty puulle. Maalaus sijaitsee Madridissa, Museo del Pradossa. Teoksen on tehnyt Pieter Brueghel. Hän on syntynyt vuonna 1525/1530 ja kuollut 1569.
        xxx/ellauri218.html on line 60: 4. Brueghel teki talonpoika- ja maisematyylisiä maalauksia. Hän oli hyvin moralisoiva ja kriittinen ja se näkyy hänen teoksissaan. Brueghel pilkkasi huumoria käyttämällä alinta luokkaa koko ihmiskunnan vertauskuvana. Hän käytti teoksissaan paljon vertauskuvia. Yleensä 1500-luvulla taiteilijoilla oli italialaisvaikutteinen tyyli maalauksissaan, mutta Brieghel hylkäsi tietoisesti sen tyylisuunnan ja loi omanlaisensa maalaustavan. Hänen aiheenaan oli maaseutu ja sen ihmiset.
        xxx/ellauri218.html on line 391: For according to Spassky himself, the rumors that his mother was Jewish were not true. And what's even worse, Spassky recently signed an antisemitic petition that called Judaism "inhumane", said its followers "committed ritual murders", and asked for an expulsion of Jewish organizations from Russia. Proving that even geniuses can be idiots.
        xxx/ellauri224.html on line 345: Ok, I tried. This novella is only about 100 pages long, but I got 10 pages in and I'm just not in any way interested. He's not Chinese, but he sort of looks like he's Chinese, so he goes to China for five years, but returns to Chicago to be near a woman he hasn't seen in 15 years because he's never been able to stop thinking about her, but then he's told he looks like he's Japanese, and gosh that's true! so he cuts his hair to look more Japanese, and he goes to a dinner party with rich people, then runs into the woman he's been pining over for 15 years and doesn't recognize her, and I just couldn't go any further. Another one off my shelf!
        xxx/ellauri224.html on line 363: We should never think selfless virtue can be reached by treading on others. The cold splinter at the heart of the true artist must be harsher in its quarrel with the self than it is in its rhetorical engagement with other people. For believers, this is the virtue of humility; I am not sure what the rest of us can call it. What we can agree on is the constant examination of conscience, and, when we fall short, a conscious decision to do better.
        xxx/ellauri224.html on line 444: There important historical antecedents that may help us figure out the true reasons of the charming beauty of Ukranian women. Ukraine is a very special country which is located nearly in the centre of Europe. Therefore, it has always been the point of intersection between different cultures and nations. It has been largely affected by both, the West and the East. The trade routes that were used by the ancient and middle ages merchants ran through the territory of the modern-day Ukraine. Thus, nations such as the Nordic Vikings and Southern Greeks met each other en route to their destinations towns and ports. They made their way through Ukraine. Eastern tribes of the Pechenegs, Kipchaks and even Mongols have all contributed to the modern beauty of the Ukranian women. Afterwards, it was largely affected by Russia which also has very beautiful women. During the past century, lots of European nations managed to leave their scumbags in the Ukraine. So, this is the historical background which helps us realise that the current beauty of the Ukranian women is attributed to the mixture of very different nations from two different parts of the world.
        xxx/ellauri224.html on line 524: After Pierre releases the duo for correctly answering a question about ostriches, Fred and Barney head over to a local arcade named Captain Stu's Space-O-Rama. Once inside, they encounter Zoltan and his cultists who give them Wilma and Betty in exchange for a toy that Fred and Barney later on (see below) try to pass off as the Transfunctioner. Tommy, Christie, and the jocks arrive along with Nelson and his dog, whom they release after Tommy snatches the fake Transfunctioner from Zoltan. The two sets of aliens arrive and notify everyone of the real Continuum Transfunctioner: a Rubik's Cube that Barney has been working hard to solve. He then solves it on the spot, causing the device to shapeshift into its true form. The boys are warned that once the five girls stop flashing, the universe will be destroyed.
        xxx/ellauri227.html on line 154: Yxi menestyxeni ehdottomista avaimista on ollut yrittäjähenkisyys! Dekkarien suhteen hänellä ei ole pienintäkään pyrkimystä uudistumiseen. Never change a winning strategy. Periaate on sama kuin Cluedo-pelissä. Plagioin aika paljon true crime genrestä, esim Ann Rulelta. Ann rules! Rakastan kaikkia tositarinoihin perustuvia elokuvia. Siis ihan kaikkia! Tai no ihan kaikkia en ole vielä nähnyt, mutta kaikkia niitä jotka olen. Ihan parhautta ovat sarjamurhaajista kertovat elokuvat, niinkuin sekin uskomaton leffa Al Bundysta. Se oli kenkäkauppias, möi kahmaloittain Crocseja. Se ryhtyi sarjamurhaajaxi kun sen vaimo hukkasi sen sukkia pesukoneessa.
        xxx/ellauri227.html on line 156: Ann Rae Rule (née Stackhouse; October 22, 1931 – July 26, 2015) was an American author of true crime books and articles. She is best known for The Stranger Beside Me (1980), about the serial killer Al Bundy, with whom Rule worked and whom she considered a friend, but was later revealed to be a murderer. Rule is also known for her book Small Sacrifices, about Oregon child murderer Diane Downs. Many of Rule's books center on murder cases that occurred in the Pacific Northwest and her adopted home state of Washington.
        xxx/ellauri228.html on line 39: "I shall now put a few final questions to the honorable delegation from Rhohchia! Is it not true that many years ago there landed on the then dead planet of Earth a ship carrying your flag, and that, due to a refrigerator malfunction, a portion of its perishables had gone bad? Is it not true that on this ship there were two spacehands, afterwards stricken from all the registers for unconscionable double-dealing with duckweed liverwurst, and that this pair of arrant knaves, these Milky-Way ne'er-do wells, were named Lorrd and God? Is it not true that Lorrd and God decided, in their drunkenness, not to content themselves with the usual pollution of a defenseless, uninhabited planet, that their notion was to set off, in a manner vicious and vile, a biological evolution the likes of which the world had never seen before? Is it not true that both these Rhohches, with malice aforethought, malice of the greatest volume and intensity, de vised a way to make of Earth-on a truly galactic scale-a breed ing ground for freaks, a cosmic side show, a panopticum, an exhibit of grisly prodigies and curios, a display whose living specimens would one day become the butt of jokes told even in the outermost Nebulae?!
        xxx/ellauri228.html on line 41: Is it not true that, bereft of all sense of decency and ethical restraints, both these miscreants then emptied on the rocks of lifeless Earth six barrels of gelatinous glue, rancid, plus two cans of albuminous paste, spoiled, and that to this ooze they added some curdled ribose, pentose, and levulose, and-as though that filth were not enough-they poured upon it three large jugs of a mildewed solution of amino acids, then stirred the seething swill with a coal shovel twisted to the left, and also used a poker, likewise bent in the same direction, as a consequence of which the proteins of all future organisms on Earth were LEFT-handed?! And finally, is it not true that God, suffering at the time from a boner and moreover egged on by Lorrd, who was reeling from an excessive intake of intoxicants, did willfully and knowingly jerk off into that protoplasmal matter, and, having infected it thereby with the most virulent viruses, guffawed that he had thus breathed 'the fucking breath of life' into those miserable evolutionary be ginnings?!
        xxx/ellauri228.html on line 43: And is it not true that this leftwardness and the virulence were thereafter transmitted and handed down from organism to organism, and now afflict with their continuing presence the innocent representatives of the race Artefacto Abhorrens, who gave themselves the name of 'homo sapiens' pure out of simple-minded ignorance? And therefore is it not that the Rhohches must not only pay the Earthlings' in fee, to the tune of a billion tons of platinum, but also compense the unfortunate victims of their planetary incontinence - in the
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 93: 2. That which is Attested unanimously by such a Multitude of Flies, and so Circumstanc’d, that they can neither be Mistaken in it Themselves, nor Conspire to deceive others is true;
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 95: Therefore That there is a turd nearby is True.
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 97: 27. No Dead Testimony or History has any Authority, but by virtue of Living Testimony or Tradition. For, since Falshoods may be Written or Printed as well as Truths, it follows that nothing is therefore of any Authority, because ‘tis Written or Printed. Wherefore, no Book or History can Authenticate another Book; whence follows that, if it have any Authority, it must have it from Living Authority or Tradition, continuing down to us the Consent of the World, from the time that Author Writ, or the matters of Fact it relates were done, that the things it relates are True in the main; and, consequently, that the Book that relates them deserves Credit, or is (as we use to say) an Authentick History. For example, had a Romance, (soberly penn’d,) and Curtius’s History been found in a Trunk for many Hundreds of Years after they were writ; and the Tradition of the former Ages had been perfectly Silent concerning them both, and the Matters they relate; we must either have taken both of them for a Romance, or both for a True History; being destitute of any Light to make the least difference between them. [So there, fucking protestants!]
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 108: What an Old Wife said is True That she saw a Spright is what an Old Wife said; therefore That she saw a Spright is True.
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 125: (3.) Careless reading. – Few tremble at the Word of God. Few, in reading it, hear the voice of Jehovah, which is full of majesty. Some, by having so large a portion, may be tempted to weary of it, as Israel did of the daily manna, saying – “Our soul loatheth this light and fluffy bread;” and to read it in a slight and careless manner. This would be fearfully provoking to God. Take heed lest that word be true of you – “Ye said, also, Behold what a weariness is it! and ye have snuffed at it, saith the Lord of Toasts.”
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 294: Elvis Presley in rue_Romance" title="True Romance">True Romance
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 533: Much impressed by what I had heard, I returned to my reading, the third volume now of Dichotican history. It described the Era of Transcarnal Centralization. The Sopsyputer at first worked to everyone´s satisfaction, but then new beings began appearing on the planet-bibods, tribods, quadribods, then octabods, and finally those that had no intention whatever of ending in an enumerable way, for in the course of life they were constantly sprouting something new. This was the result of a defect, a faulty reiteration - recursion in programming language or - to put it in automata terms - the machine had started looping. Since however the cult of its perfection was in full sway people actually praised these automorphic deviations, asserting for example that all that incessant budding and branching out was in fact the true expression of man´s Protean nature. And this praise not only held up the repairs, but led to the rise of so-called indeterminants or entits (N-tits), who lost their way in their own body, there was so much of it; completely baffled, they would get themselves into so-called bindups, entangulums and snorls; often an ambulance squad was needed to untie them. The repair of the Sopsyputer didn´t work - named the Oopsyputer, it was finally blown sky high. The feeling of relief that followed didn´t last long however, for the accursed question soon returned, What to do about the body now?
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 537: The turning over of individual looks to private enterprise led, after several decades, to a new crisis. True, a few philosophers had already come forward with the notion that the greater the progress, the more the crises, and that in the absence of crises one ought to produce them, because they activated, integrated, aroused the creative impulse, the lust for battle, and gave both spiritual and material energies direction. In a word, creative destruction spurs societies to concerted action, and without them you get stagnation, decadence, and other symptoms of decay. These views are voiced by the school of "economic liberals," i.e. philosophers who derive optimism for the future from a pessimistic appraisal of the present.
        xxx/ellauri229.html on line 777: A thought, once uttered, is untrue. Quod semel emissumst volat irrevocabile verbum.
        xxx/ellauri232.html on line 88: The dismantling of the welfare system over the last several decades, congruent with the ‘New Labourisation’ of the Swedish Social Democrats and the tax-cutting policies of the centre-right governments from 2006 to 2014, is, in familiar scapegoating, being blamed on refugees depicted as dead weights burdening the country.
        xxx/ellauri232.html on line 94: Meanwhile, optimistic neoliberal positions wonder how could this happen, if the world is richer than ever, and more and more people have been dragged from poverty. That statistics is no longer even true, and largely overlooks that the poorest classes in developed countries have seen none of this improvement, and that redistribution mechanisms in these countries have been severely diminished by decades of neoliberal policies. The picture below displays the real income growth of the world population, and where it has (roughly) ended up.
        xxx/ellauri233.html on line 350: Ottaen huomioon ne muutamat alukset, jotka yritys lähetti Englannista ja niiden lastien huono kauppaarvo (kangas, veitset, silmälasit, intialainen puuvilla jne.), Adamsilla oli vaikutusvaltaa saamaan kauppatodistukset shōgunilta, jotta yritys voisi osallistua Punainen Hylje järjestelmään. Se teki yhteensä seitsemän roskamatkaa Kaakkois-Aasiaan vaihtelevin tuloksin. Neljää johti William Adams kapteenina. Adams nimesi vuonna 1617 hankkimansa aluksen uudelleen "Jumalan ilmaisexi lahjaksi". Sen Kiinan matka meni aivan perseelleen. Retkikunnan tarkoituksena oli ostaa raakasilkkiä, kiinalaisia ​​tavaroita, sappapuuta, hirvennahoja ja rauskunnahoja (jälkimmäisiä käytettiin japanilaisten miekkojen kahvoihin). Aluksella oli 1 250 puntaa hopeaa ja 175 puntaa tavaraa (intialaista puuvillaa, japanilaisia ​​aseita ja lakkatuotteita). Seurue kohtasi taifuunin lähellä Ryukyu-saaria (nykyinen Okinawa ) ja joutui pysähtymään siellä korjaamaan 27. joulukuuta 1614 toukokuuhun 1615 asti. Se palasi Japaniin kesäkuussa 1615 ilman, että se oli suorittanut kauppaa.
        xxx/ellauri233.html on line 432: Jewish and Muslim commentators cite studies by the Vilna Gaon and Rebbe Schlemiel that show shechita is humane and that criticism is at least partially motivated by antisemitism. A Knesset committee announced (January, 2012) that it would call on European parliaments and the European Union to put a stop to attempts to outlaw kosher slaughter. "The pretext [for this legislation] is preventing cruelty to animals or animal rights—but there is an obvious element of anti-Semitism and a badly hidden message that Jews are cruel to animals," said Committee Chair MK Danny Danon (Likud).
        xxx/ellauri233.html on line 442: Temple Grandin has worked closely with Jewish slaughterers to design more comfortable handling systems for cattle, and has said: "When the cut is done correctly, the animal appears not to feel it. Anyway I don't. From an animal-welfare standpoint, the major concern during ritual slaughter are the stressful and cruel methods of restraint (holding) that are used in some plants."
        xxx/ellauri235.html on line 481: Roald Dahl's children's books are full of barely submerged misogyny, lust and violence. Roald Dahl was an unpleasant man who wrote macabre books – and yet children around the world adore them. Perhaps this shouldn’t surprise us, writes Hephzibah (Hetty) Anderson. Kids can be so cruel. Oh can we? Thanx mom! .... Oow! Oow!
        xxx/ellauri235.html on line 734: The Spider and the Fly is a poem by Mary Howitt (1799–1888), published in 1829. The first line of the poem is "'Will you walk into my parlour?' said the Spider to the Fly." The story tells of a cunning spider who entraps a fly like Korinna (the name means little girl) into its web through the use of seduction and manipulation. The poem is a cautionary tale against those who use flattery and charm to disguise their true intentions (of fucking the little fly silly).
        xxx/ellauri237.html on line 172:
        Gruess miteinander!

        xxx/ellauri237.html on line 766: tus actos y prueba que tu siempre
        xxx/ellauri237.html on line 889: Las implicaciones de esto son claras: para estudiar la personalidad hay que conocer también el contexto en el que habitan las personas y el modo en el que este responde a las necesidades motivacionales de los individuos. Centrarse simplemente en administrar varios test para obtener una puntuación no nos da una visión acertada sobre esto, ya que se parte de un sesgo al considerar que la personalidad es lo que pueda ser captado por estas pruebas de recogida de datos. Se trata de un punto de vista parecido al que aplican al ámbito de las capacidades mentales psicólogos como Howard Gardner y Robert J. Sternberg, críticos con la concepción psicométrica de la inteligencia.
        xxx/ellauri237.html on line 1023: Väitöskirjatyönsä aikana hän teki tutkimustyötä Rochesterissa sijaitsevassa Society for Cruelty to Children -tutkimuslaitoksessa ja eteni laitoksen johtajaksi vuonna 1930. Vuonna 1939 hän julkaisi yhdessä tri Mengelen kanssa kirjan The Clinical Treatment of the Problem Child.
        xxx/ellauri237.html on line 1025: Rogersin mukaan terapeuttista yhteistoimintaa edistävät varaukseton arvostus (unconditional positive regard), johdonmukaisuus (congruence) ja osuva autettavan näkökulman tavoittaminen (accurate emphaty). Parhaiten terapia tuottaa katetta kun siinä:
        xxx/ellauri239.html on line 473: "Anne Holt har med dette første bind i en ny serie for alvor lagt spor ud til endnu en rigtigt spændende række gode krimier. Begyndelsen er under alle omstændigheder forrygende spændende - og som forventet ud fra mine oplevelser med Anne Holts øvrige bøger også rigtigt godt skruet sammen samt velskrevet." Krimifan.dk, 5 af 5 hjerter
        xxx/ellauri250.html on line 312: Nicolas: God! I don't know who is the good from the bad anymore. Reading these comments sounds no better then that of what you damn. I don't see anything in the world today but self serving people that excuse themselves from the hate they put into the world by the hate that the world has made them endure. It's a gross cycle that makes me fear the end is not a possibility until the sweet escape of death. Everyday I welcome that silence more and more. Life's thin vale of beauty was taken by the one I trusted most. Yet it is the true face of this world I now see. From such betrayal I am left with a world consumed by the poison it shames. I welcome anything that takes this away. I ask for nothing because nothing is exactly what I desire most.
        xxx/ellauri250.html on line 405: They say it’s better to travel than arrive, which in the case of Compartment Number 6 is certainly true.

        xxx/ellauri250.html on line 419: Tää homo ei saa sijoitettua pätkää netflix-laatikoihin ja on sixi aivan hukassa. Onko se rom-com, onko se komedia laisinkaan? Missä kohtaa piti nauraa ja missä itkeä? En ymmärrä. "Because Laura and Lhoja (sic!) don’t entirely play out the cliché of tension and anger leading to true love, the film comes off as vague and evasive." Voi helskutti. In an interview, the director says “What really interested me were the feelings that are beyond sexual tension. Romantic love stories are often too narrow, do they fall in love? If so, when do they have sex?” Erittäinkin hyvin sanottu, mutta se menee tämän homse arvostelijan pään yli niin ettei edes tukka heilahda.
        xxx/ellauri250.html on line 433: True to national character, the Russian's drunk, aggressive, and crude; boasts of Russia’s greatness; insults Estonia (she explains that she’s from Finland); and, while asking her if she’s “selling pussy (her own, not somebody else's),” grabs her between her legs.
        xxx/ellauri250.html on line 478: Tietoja avausotsikoista kuulostaa Roxy Musicilta: "Etkö näe, rakkaus on minulle huume". (Vittu mitä väliä! Että ottaa päähän tollaset mukanokkelat musaneropatit.) Henkiseen jatkuvuuteen viittaava kappale muuttuu diegeettiseksi heti, kun ensimmäinen kuva ilmestyy. Kävelemme Lauran (Seidi Haarla) kanssa seurueen huoneiden läpi, puoliksi subjektiivisella seurantatasolla. Tämän resurssin ja äänen käytön avulla kentän ulkopuolella käsitys ympäristöstä uhkana suodattuu epämääräisesti. Tiedämme pian vahvistaaksemme sen, että Laura on vieraassa maassa: hän on suomalainen Moskovassa, joka on aloittanut suhteen venäläisen naisen kanssa.
        xxx/ellauri250.html on line 933: Ved en avsidesliggende hytte får en gutt og moren hans, Sarah, besøk av hans voldelige biologiske far, en politibetjent ved navn Jonas. Jonas slår og angriper Sarah, som truer med å fortelle kona til Jonas om deres uekte sønn. Jonas reiser sin vei, og Sarah følger etter i bilen sin sammen med sønnen deres. Hun kjører i en katatonisk tilstand, og slipper rattet. Gutten kommer seg ut når bilen krasjer i en innsjø. Men moren hans blir sittende i bilen og synker.
        xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1603: Because thou art cruel and men are piteous,
        xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2289: But cruel, and in his ravin like a beast,
        xxx/ellauri252.html on line 48: Documentario capostipite del genere "mondo movie", è incentrato su usi e costumi inconsueti o scioccanti dei vari popoli nel mondo, tra curiosi riti tribali, scene di alcolizzati, varie uccisioni e maltrattamenti di animali, inquinamento dei mari, funerali bizzarri, fan scatenate che spogliano Rossano Brazzi. Nel film vengono poi mostrate le cruente processioni tipiche del venerdì santo, che tuttora si svolgono in alcuni centri del meridione, in cui i partecipanti si autoflagellano il corpo per devozione, fino a sanguinare copiosamente, e una cerimonia nel sud-est asiatico, in cui vengono decapitati alcuni tori.
        xxx/ellauri253.html on line 242: Laura Quinn IBM. Kaskun ei Microsoft. True blue sinisen armeijakunnan kuikalla on jalavoissa vanhat Adidaxet USA- solidaarisuuden merkkinä. Mitä vitun vainajia ne oikein raahaavat pakasteautoon ruskeissa papersäkeissä? Oispa "Bobilla" ollut nää jätkät repsikoina. ei olis jäänyt mattorulla pihalle. Markku rakastaa isänmaata enemmän kuin Ville-vauvaa tahi Vuokkoa. Vuokko ei jaxa enää lapioida lunta pihalta.
        xxx/ellauri253.html on line 514: ”Te ette turhaan taistelleet, te ette turhaan kaatuneet, te saitte voiton suurimman: te voititte veljen veljelleen, te löysitte kansan eksyneen, te airuet aamunkoiton.” Tää siis viittaa siihen että punikit saatiin takas isänmaan riveihin.
        xxx/ellauri255.html on line 104: Antony Pyp Pipo: What has stood out is the sheer horror of the civil war. There’s a savagery and a sadism that is very hard to comprehend; I’m still mulling it over and trying to understand it. It was not just the build-up of hatred over centuries but a vengeance that seemed to be required. It went beyond the killing; there was also the sheer, horrible inventiveness of the tortures inflicted on people. We need to look at the origins of the civil war: who started it, and was it avoidable? But one also needs to see the different patterns seen in the “Red Terror” (the campaign of political repression and violence carried out by the Bolsheviks) and the “White Terror” (the equal or worse violence perpetrated by that side in the war)– and consider the question: why are civil wars so much crueller, so much more savage than state-on-state wars?
        xxx/ellauri255.html on line 108: rue&fit=620,413" />
        xxx/ellauri259.html on line 572: Tematikken vil for nogle være velkendt fra filmen Groundhog Day (’En ny dag truer’, 1993) eller muligvis fra Svend Åge Madsens kierkegaardske thriller Lad tiden gå (1986), men hos Solvej Balle tvistes eksperimentet intelligent til »et rationelt delirium« og »en logisk kværnen«, og decideret provokerende er det for læseren at følge, hvordan Tara efterhånden besættes af ønsket om en verden, hvor tiden går, af sin længsel efter at »finde den dør, der fører ud af den attende november«.
        xxx/ellauri259.html on line 576: Afslutningsvis kan man spørge, hvad det er, der gør en roman som denne eksistentielt så vigtig midt i en tid, hvor såvel politiske som klimamæssige sammenbrud og katastrofer truer. Jo, Om udregning af rumfang går, på sin egen sindige, stilfærdige måde, hen og bliver en forløsende og forsonlig påmindelse om, hvor udsatte vi i grunden er.
        xxx/ellauri261.html on line 95: Jossain vaiheessa seurueeseemme liittyy myös Isä Ambrosius, ortodoksisen kirkon väsymätön etsijä, joka viimeistelyä vailla olevasta romaanistani kuultuaan ehdottaa, että pitäisin romaanin teemojen pohjalta eteerisen luentosarjan Valamon kesävieraille, jotka ovat matkanneet luonnon helmaan etsimään toisenlaista tietoisuutta ja sitä kautta henkisen elämän eväitä. Lupaan harkita asiaa, mutta painotan etten mielelläni tee sitovia päätöksiä koomamaisen ryyppäyksen keskellä. Isä ymmärtää ja ehdottaa maljaa romaneille, joille kaikki pöydässä istujat ennustavat suurta menestystä.
        xxx/ellauri265.html on line 427: rue/crop/4924x3280+4+0/resize/1300x866!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.vox-cdn.com%2Fthumbor%2FMl4omTTysy_PxbVWLb8RQ3a9pGk%3D%2F0x0%3A4928x3280%2F4928x3280%2Ffilters%3Afocal%284166x1836%3A4167x1837%29%2Fcdn.vox-cdn.com%2Fuploads%2Fchorus_asset%2Ffile%2F23606109%2Fjonathanhaidt.jpeg" height="300px" />
        xxx/ellauri268.html on line 146: – Siltsu oli helppo tunnistaa, ei hänestä voinut erehtyä. Siinä hän istui tiskillä ja näkyi juovan ainakin viiniä ja salmaria. Jonkinlainen seurue siinä oli, mutta Siltsu viihtyi tiskillä myös itsekseen, silminnäkijä kertoi Seiskalle. Myöhemmin kohulaulaja puhkesi itkuun, ja hikikin alkoi puskea päälle.
        xxx/ellauri268.html on line 240: What is a character that is written so you're meant to feel one way towards them, but you actually feel the opposite about them? Mine is Merope Gaunt. She was written to be pitied for, and that would be true for almost all of her story, but I find it hard to really do that when you consider she basically gave Riddle either a date rape potion or used dark magic to make him a puppet and remove all form of mental resistance from his head by magic and had sex with him against the will of his right mind to have a child, then expected him to stay for a child he never meant to have.
        xxx/ellauri280.html on line 458: Bicornis, vel Arabice Du al-Qarnain est Alcorani persona, de quo sura XVIII (Al-Kahf) narrat. Rex iustissimus et potentissimus et Deo fidelis, orbem terrarum ab occasi Solis ad ortum tenebat, iustos servans et peccatores multans; murum ferreum inter montes aedificat ut populos boreales Gog et Magog excluderet, quem murum ante diem Iudicii ultimi Gog et Magog destruerent. Iskandar (Alexander) Du al-Qarnain ab interpretibus interdum nominatur.
        xxx/ellauri281.html on line 825: Presidentti Urho Kekkonen lähti teollisuusjohtajista koostuneen seurueen kanssa viisipäiväiselle kalastusmatkalle Islantiin. Katastrofaaliseksi luonnehditun matkan aikana otetut lehtikuvat paljastivat presidentin kunnon romahtamisen.
        xxx/ellauri287.html on line 229: rue1/c627079319ba0acc8c6d8ea81e5dc39eb2/doctor_2.jpg" height="250px" />
        xxx/ellauri287.html on line 230: rue1/c627079319ba0acc8c6d8ea81e5dc39eb2/doctor_1_2.jpg" height="250px" />
        xxx/ellauri287.html on line 231: rue1/c627079319ba0acc8c6d8ea81e5dc39eb2/doctor_3.jpg" height="250px" />
        xxx/ellauri292.html on line 47: In Rahab, Woman of Jericho, readers discover a Rahab who is a descendent of the tribe of Ephraim, one of the ten lost tribes of Israel. Her clan left Egypt and settled in Canaan before the Hebrews were enslaved. Although they did not wander in the desert with Moses for forty years, nor did they hear the laws that the Lord gave to His people, they still worshipped the one true God, though without the fringes.
        xxx/ellauri292.html on line 122: “Hindi totoo ‘yan, ako nasa tamang katinuan pa naman ako (That is not true, me, I am still in a right frame of mind),” Super Tekla tearfully said in an interview with GMA released Thursday.
        xxx/ellauri292.html on line 246: Helmikuussa 1810 Stanhope lähti Portsmouthista veljensä James Hamilton Stanhopen kanssa, joka seurasi häntä Rodokselle asti. Hänen lähipiirinsä joukossa olivat hänen lääkärinsä ja myöhempi elämäkerran kirjoittaja Charles Lewis Meryon ja hänen piikansa Elizabeth Williams ja Ann Fry. Rodoksella hän tapasi Michael Brucen, seikkailijan ja myöhemmin kansanedustajan, josta tuli hänen rakastajansa ja matkakumppaninsa. Väitetään, että kun seurue saapui Ateenaan, runoilija Lord Byron, Brucen yliopistoystävä, sukelsi mereen tervehtimään heitä. Myöhemmin Byron kuvaili Stanhopea "se vaarallisin asia, naispuolinen älypää" ja huomautti, että hänellä oli "suuri välinpitämättömyys keskustelussaan ja käytöksessään vastaanotetuista käsitteistä". Myöhemmin hän väitti, että hän päätti olla osallistumatta naisten oikeuksia koskevaan keskusteluun Stanhopen (hirvittävä keskustelija) kanssa, koska "haluan seksiä liian paljon riitautuakseni heidän kanssaan." Sama juttu muuten uroskoirilla. Ateenasta Stanhopen seurue matkusti edelleen Konstantinopoliin (nykyinen Istanbul), Ottomaanien valtakunnan pääkaupunkiin. He aikoivat edetä Kairoon, joka vasta äskettäin selvisi kaaoksesta, joka seurasi Napoleonin hyökkäystä Egyptiin ja sitä seuranneita kansainvälisiä konflikteja.
        xxx/ellauri292.html on line 361: Tuomari yrittää vetästä Huldaa kahden kesken välikössä siinä onnistumatta, ja ilmoittaa seurueelle kotona, että Huldasta tulee hänen vaimonsa. Hulda ei jää kuuntelemaan vaan syöksyy ulos. Tuomari odottaa häntä keittiön ovella ja ottaa "tämän" syliinsä. Hulda torjuu moneen kertaan miehen "kosinnan", kunnes antaa periksi. Napit lentelevät. Hulda ja tuomari naivat sinnikkäästi keittokomerossa, vaikka siinä on aika ahdasta. Aina Huldan puolia pitänyt Conny-täti kuulee metakan ensimmäisenä. Tuomari sanoo, että tätiä tarvitaan lapsenhoitajana, sillä vaikka Hulda on nyt takuulla tiineenä, sen on pakko panostaa izekin uraansa. ”Että minun pitikin rakastua diktaattoriin”, Conny-täti nuhtelee hellästi mutta trendikkkäästi.
        xxx/ellauri292.html on line 599: Vielä 1 teoria on, että kykeonin psykoaktiivinen aine on bilehuume DMT, jota esiintyy monissa Välimeren luonnonvaraisissa kasveissa, mukaan lukien Phalaris ja/tai Acacia. Ollakseen aktiivinen suun kautta (kuten ayahuascassa ), se on yhdistettävä monoamiinioksidaasin estäjään , kuten Syyrian rue ( Peganum harmala ), joka kasvaa kaikkialla Välimerellä. Tai sitne vaan pidättivät hengitystä tullaxeen sinisixi kuten joogassa.
        xxx/ellauri306.html on line 679: | ROBIN: What a cruel thing to do

        xxx/ellauri314.html on line 97: Amerikkalaiset eivät siitä yhtään tykänneet. Eric Bentley saw the play as "a potential tragedy deflected from its true course by Marxist sympathies." Kiinalaiset ymmärsivät Willyä, joka koitti tehdä pojistansa louhikäärmeitä.
        xxx/ellauri320.html on line 61: rue" height="250px"/>
        xxx/ellauri329.html on line 52: Je prends quelque ruelle où pousse le gazon Otan kujan, jossa ruoho kasvaa
        xxx/ellauri329.html on line 66: Je gagne la grand’ rue, où je puis encor voir tulen pääkadulle, jossa näen edelleen
        xxx/ellauri329.html on line 87:
        My dreams come true

        xxx/ellauri363.html on line 294: rue&resize=600,400" />
        xxx/ellauri376.html on line 274: Mauprat est un roman historique publié en 1837. L'histoire se déroule pour la majeure partie dans le Berry à l'aube de la Révolution française au XVIIIe siècle. Il relate l'histoire d'un jeune garçon issu d'une famille de seigneurs cruels, les Mauprat, qui échappe peu à peu à son lourd héritage familial grâce à l'amour qu'il éprouve pour sa cousine Edmée, nettement plus civilisée que lui. L'œuvre recèle plusieurs aspects: si Mauprat est avant tout un roman d'amour et une histoire de famille, c'est aussi un roman politique, une fable philosophique et un manifeste féminin.
        xxx/ellauri376.html on line 318: Hyvä Pavel Alexandrych, kirjoittaa Panurge Pantagruelille, täällä vielä yksi poikamies. Olen taas yksinäinen, kuten ennen vanhaan. Pikku Polinka Sax ei ole enää siellä, vain prinsessa Polina Aleksandrovna Galitskaja on jäljellä.
        xxx/ellauri376.html on line 323: Druzhinin korostaa vapaata, häiriötöntä elämää luonnon sylissä ja gastronomisia nautintoja "pantagruelismin" pääominaisuuksina. ”Polinka Sax” oli suuri menestys lukijoiden keskuudessa, mikä heijastui silloiseen journalismiin.
        xxx/ellauri379.html on line 158: Left foot, right foot. Vasen oikee nosta koipee sieltä näkyy pyöree soikee. Vitun neekerit. Inhoon räppiä. Toinen samanlainen lommopyllyä twerkkaava pelle on Taylor Swift. Enole mikään kopio, kopio, kopio... Time lehti valizi Taylor Swiftin vuoden 2023 "henkilöxi". Taylor Swift yllätti faninsa. Mikä tekee Taylor Swiftistä niin erikoisen? Sanos se. Ai no joo: Swift is one of the world's best-selling artists, with 200 million records sold worldwide as of 2019. Economist Alan Krueger described Swift as an "economic genius". Swift auttoi myymään amerikkalaista kantrimusiikkia laajentaen sen menestystä anglosfäärin ulkopuolelle, aloitti Internetin käytön markkinointityökaluna ja esitteli genitaalejaan nuoremmalle sukupolvelle. She is the "millennial Bruce Springsteen"
        xxx/ellauri380.html on line 480: Tribalism, which was and is the salvation of the Jewish community, has been the bane of Arab society. It's due to the great Arab calamity of 1258, the true Nakba, their utter destruction at the hands of the Mongols which left them broken and helpless against the Seljuks and then the Ottomans. The Arabs were essentially slaves for nearly 700 years, until the Europeans freed them from the yoke of the Turks. They have never recovered from that existential disaster, nor are they likely to. Ironically, the only people who could take them under their wing and point them in the right direction are the Jews. But that ain't happening any time soon. We genocide them first.
        xxx/ellauri385.html on line 80: John (Lowery) 5 (s. 31. heinäkuuta 1971), varaosa. Vuonna 2022 hän soittaa Mötley Cruen kiertuekitaristina Mick Marsin eläköidyttyä pitkään sairastamansa selkärankareuman vuoksi. John 5 ylsi maailman nopeimpien kitaristien listalla sijalle 10.
        xxx/ellauri385.html on line 232: Joka vakavasti ajattelee tätä asiaa, alkaa aavistella, ettei sexi sinänsä vaadi tukahduttamista ja torjuntatoimenpiteitä, vaan sexityön nykyiset muodot, ja on mielihyvin valmis uhraamaan nuo muodot poistaakseen lasten ja nuorten elämästä sanomattoman määrän kurjuutta. Silloin ei enää olekaan kysymys kulttuurista, vaan yhteiskuntajärjestyksestä. Tutkittaessa sukupuolisuuden tukahduttamisvaatimusten ja seksuaalıtorjunnan vaiheita käy ilmi, etteivät ne ajoitu kulttuurin apinavaiheeseen eivätkä siis ole kulttuurin syntymisen ja kehittymisen edellytyksiä. Ne ovat saaneet alkunsa suhteellisen myöhään ja alkaneet hahmottua autoritaarisen isänvallan ja luokkajaon syntyvaiheissa. Yhteisön kaikkien jäsenten sukupuoliset toiveet ja halut alkavat joutua vähemmistön taloudellisia etuja palvelemaan; isän oikeudellisesti hallitsema avioliitto ja perhe ovat tämän asiantilan kiinteä järjestymä. Kun sukupuolisuutta näin rajoitetaan ja tukahdutetaan, ihmisten tuntemistapa muuttuu, syntyy sukupuolisuuteen kielteisesti suhtautuva uskonto, joka vähitellen pystyttää oman seksuaalipoliittisen organisaationsa, nimittäin kirkon ja sen kaikki airueet, joiden ainoana tavoitteena on hävittää juurineen ihmisten sukupuolikalut, tervata perseet vielä kuonpuoleisessakin, ja saman tien liiskata sen vähäisen onnen, mitä heille maan päällä on tarjolla. Tämä on sosiologisesti hyvinkin perusteltua sikäli, että se liittyy ihmistyövoiman riistoon, joka nykyisın on ylimpia tavoitteita.
        xxx/ellauri385.html on line 368: A true retreat of sorrow and despair,

        810