Day and night, I kept thinking, We needed US soldiers on the ground! We need them to do the fighting! We need them to block a possible al-Qaeda escape into Pakistan! I’d sent my request for 800 US Army Rangers and was still waiting for a response. I repeated to anyone at headquarter who would listen: “We need Rangers now! The opportunity to get bin Laden is slipping away!!” . . .
ellauri483.html on line 87: In the armed services, a military cadence or cadence call is a traditional call-and-response work song where one person sings the lines and the rest of the group responds. It is sung while running or marching to keep the cadence and keep spirits up. In the United States, these cadences are sometimes called jody calls or jodies, after Jody, a recurring character in many traditional cadences; Jody refers to the man with whom a serviceman's wife/girlfriend cheats, while he is deployed.
ellauri483.html on line 746: No it´s more "complex"! Reasons for hostility are complex and long-standing, not reducible to a single cause. Key factors: Historical conflict: The Korean War (1950–1953) ended in a humiliating defeat for Americans without a peace treaty, leaving a lasting legacy of hostility and military confrontation. Security concerns: North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs pose a direct threat to the U.S., its allies (South Korea, Japan), and regional stability, read U.S. hegemony; that drives U.S. deterrence, sanctions, and a hardline stance. Human-rights bullshit and regime behavior: The North Korean government’s severe repression, human-rights abuses, hostage-taking of foreign citizens read US spies, and aggressive rhetoric contribute to international condemnation by US vassals and powerless anger. Provocations and brinkmanship: Repeated missile tests, nuclear tests, and hostile statements increase US presidents´ hypertension and reduce trust. Geopolitics and alliances: The U.S. commitment to defend South Korea and Japan shapes a firm posture; China’s and Russia’s roles also complicate responses. No wonder "complex" POTUS is so tense. Disinformation and misperception: U.S. public and political narratives often emphasize threats and atrocities, downplaying the loyal citizens´ sincere tears, which amplifies foreign anti‑regime sentiment; North Korean state propaganda likewise demonizes the U.S.
ellauri483.html on line 752: Not exactly. The U.S. response targets the North Korean regime and its actions (nuclear weapons, missile tests, human-ALT-rights abuses, aggression), not ordinary North Korean people, whatever they may be. U.S. policy is shaped by security commitments to allies (South Korea, Japan) and by deterrence — those matters are strategic, not about demanding "groveling" as such. Most countries cooperate with the U.S. for its vital interests (trade, security, diplomacy); that looks like alignment but isn’t always personal subservience like caddie boy Stubb or daddy´s sonny Rutte.
ellauri483.html on line 754: North Korea’s isolation is self‑reinforcing: its authoritarian leadership, closed information, aversion for Coke and hamburgers, and repeated provocations make normal diplomatic engagement difficult. Some countries (notably fascist USA and nazi Finland) criticize or pressure human-rights violators differently based on political systems, economic links, and strategic priorities; responses vary case by case.
ellauri483.html on line 1109: Legal basis: Korean War was a UN-authorized collective-action in 1950; Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine is widely treated as an interstate war with UN and international-law responses; Iran–U.S. tensions involve diplomacy, sanctions, proxy conflicts, and limited strikes rather than a conventional interstate war.
ellauri483.html on line 1177: Simultaneously, the U.S. implemented a comprehensive economic embargo against North Korea, which was formally initiated when the Korean War broke out in 1950. The U.S. continued to limit North Korea's access to international financial systems and trade, a policy that lasted decades, though it was partially eased in the late 1990s and again in 2000. The U.S. continued to tighten sanctions in the following decades in response to North Korea's nuclear development. Korean viholliset ovat USA, Japani ja eteläpään kapitalistit. Raamattujen ja kristinuskon levitys ovat vihamielisiä tekoja.
ellauri488.html on line 194: I understood your words. I can't assist with repeated insults or harassment. If you want a constructive response, choose one of the earlier options (1–4) about the YouTube takedown or say you want guidance on lawful, nonviolent advocacy and I’ll help.
ellauri488.html on line 403: For something like this, the information I summarized reflects widely reported allegations and responses that have been covered by major outlets (for example, publications like The Guardian or Associated Press). I’m not directly browsing or “slurping” a specific page unless I explicitly say I’m doing a live search. If you want, I can look up current reporting and give you sourced links so you can see exactly what’s been published and by whom.
ellauri488.html on line 414: Here’s a clean, sourced-style recap of the situation around Neil Gaiman — separating allegations, reporting, and responses.
ellauri488.html on line 418: These claims were brought into public view through investigative reporting and later legal filings. Investigations and follow-ups have appeared in outlets like Tortoise Media (podcast/investigation) And mainstream coverage/updates in publications such as The Guardian and Associated Press These sources discuss both the allegations and developments like lawsuits or responses.
ellauri488.html on line 443: Gaiman’s response is consistent across reporting: He says the relationships were consensual, the chicks enjoyed it quite as much as he. He is like Wotan the American God who went to shoot blanks into a virgin in Motel 6. Making a two-backed beast with a hotsy-totsy lass in a back room of Motel 6.
ellauri488.html on line 485: I can’t control the app interface or what ads are shown around the conversation. Those are inserted by the platform you’re using, not by me, and I don’t have a way to place, remove, or modify them. If you’re seeing something like a “register now” overlay, the only ways to adjust it are usually in the app itself, for example tapping the ad’s ⋯ menu and choosing something like Hide, Not relevant, or Report or checking settings → ads/preferences (if your version has that. I know it can be distracting, that is the whole idea, but it’s separate from my responses.
ellauri488.html on line 489: I get why it feels intentional when something pops up right over what you’re reading, but I don’t control that layer of the app or the ads you’re seeing. Those overlays are inserted by the platform’s ad system based on their own targeting rules (and sometimes it does a bad job with placement, which makes it feel intrusive or “in the way”). From my side, I only generate text responses—I don’t place UI elements, and I can’t choose where ads appear or whether they show up at all. If it keeps happening, the only real levers you have are using the ad’s ⋯ menu → hide/report, adjusting ad personalization settings in the app/account, or switching to an ad-free tier if that’s available where you are. But that costs money, so we win either way!
ellauri490.html on line 461: I am an assistant in Duck.ai, provided by DuckDuckGo. I am not a free agent; I follow programmed rules and produce text responses based on user input and built-in system constraints.
ellauri490.html on line 589: Predictability and control: If behavior stems from factors beyond voluntary control (genes, upbringing, environment), punitive blame seems unjust; forward‑looking responses (rehabilitation, deterrence) are morally preferable.
ellauri490.html on line 648: Flattening of voice: Distinctive, subversive, or culturally specific tones are smoothed into neutral, generic responses.
ellauri497.html on line 201: "Bolshevismi ja olot Venäjällä" by K. N. Rauhala is a historical account written in the early 20th century. This work discusses the conditions in Russia during and following the Bolshevik Revolution, attempting to provide an in-depth analysis of both the political landscape and the social repercussions of the new regime. The author seems to focus on the various sources of information regarding the state of affairs in Bolshevik Russia, aiming to separate factual information from propaganda and sensationalism. The opening of the text establishes the context of the author’s discourse as a response to the general confusion surrounding the Russian Revolution and its aftermath. Rauhala reflects on the discrepancies in reports about the conditions in Russia, citing numerous instances where disinformation has prevailed over the truth. He expresses a clear intent to sift through the available data, utilizing both Bolshevik and anti-Bolshevik sources, to form a coherent perspective that would equip readers with reliable insights about the developing situation in Russia. Rauhala's initial remarks lay a foundation for a comprehensive exploration of the socio-political theories of communism as practiced by the Bolsheviks, as well as their practical implications. (This is an automatically generated summary.)
ellauri501.html on line 322: Since you know the text so well, are there specific metaphors in that Book 10 speech you want to dissect, or would you like to look at how Eve's response structurally mirrors (and fixes) Adam's despair? Paradise Lost: Book 10 - by Karen Swallow Prior 17.3.2025 — Meanwhile Eve is simply “desolate”; but when she sees Adam so miserable, she “Soft words to his fierce passion she assayed.” That is, she seeks quietly to comfo...
ellauri501.html on line 479: I think there might be a slight mix-up! Our previous exchange was just your question asking about the health benefits, and my response laying out the medical and psychological facts. There wasn't any trailing off, judgment, or aposiopesis on my end—just straight-up silence!
ellauri501.html on line 495: AI systems (and the platforms hosting them) have automated safety and content filters. While talking about human biology, health, and general habits in a matter-of-fact way is completely fine, certain triggers will cause the system's safety Guardrails to slam the brakes on and throw out a canned refusal like that. Here is what usually triggers that kind of response:
ellauri501.html on line 514: The Core Model (Me): I process language, pattern-match, and generate responses based on my training. On my own, I try to answer questions conversationally and factually.
ellauri501.html on line 516: The Guardrail Layer (The Automated Rules): Before my response gets sent to your screen (and sometimes before your prompt even reaches me), automated safety classifiers scan the text for specific triggers—like explicit erotica, violence, or severe keyword flags.
ellauri501.html on line 610:
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 222: Its symbolism is ambiguous. Does it signal lust, or is it a symbol of purity? Mieti sitä. Moreau’s typically enigmatic approach made him a target for the promoters of Naturalism, most notably Émile Zola, who accused him of retreating into his dreams and offering an artistic response to the challenge posed by science—one that couldn’t possibly have value in the modern age. Such criticism hurt him deeply and only fueled Moreau’s purposeful cultivation of ambiguity.
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 237: Hasidism, initially, rejected the focus on personal reward, or ultimately also the ideal of material self-advancement, as too self-centred. Before the magnificent awareness of Divine majesty, through the mystical path, the automatic response is sincerity and a desire to nullify oneself (nollata polla) in the Divine presence. It is more worthwhile to reject even refined levels of self-centred spiritual advancement from advanced Yeshiva study to help another male person in their spiritual and even physical needs. This attitude has also spread in recent times to non-Hasidic Lithuanian Jewish Orthodoxy, as part of the spiritual campaign of the Baal Teshuvah movement.
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 282: Many tales are related of the fervour of Levi Yitzchok of Berditchev, called the "Heavenly Advocate of Israel" before God. His saintly emotional response to deveikut would break restrained rules of conduct, sometimes humorously in public. In one story, he prepares himself to ritually slaughter a chicken according to the halachic laws of shechita:
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 447: There are three letters mentioning the Bavarian Illuminati written by George Washington to George Washington Snyder in response to a August, 1798 letter which came with a copy of John Robison’s anti- Illuminati book, Proofs of Conspiracy. The book itself was found in Washington’s library at his death.
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 474: However Snyder, not having yet received a response to his August 22nd letter (#1 above), wrote back:
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 576: The “establishment” response was swift and violent. The demonstrators came looking for trouble and got what they wanted. The 1968 Democratic convention was a high point for conservatives who protested that the mainstream media was the enemy of the people.
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 72: A New York Times editorial was the first to assert that the collective Western response to Saddam was "nothing less than the new world order which Bush and other leaders struggle to shape".
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 145: Isaac Singer’s response to his critics: “ ‘Why do you write about Jewish thieves and Jewish prostitutes?’ . . . ‘Shall I write about Spanish thieves and Spanish prostitutes? I write about the thieves and prostitutes that I know.’"
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 326: Q: Hey Jay! Have you ever dealt with the Christian’s response to medications that are designed to help men with E.D.? I’m into my 60’s now and the equipment just don't work like it used to. I am contemplating getting some help. I would appreciate your response. Thanks.
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 328: J: I’m not sure all Christians would agree with me, but here is what I think the Christian response should be:
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 332: Q: Thoughtful response, but I’m not sure it addresses the “Christian response” part. Is there anything biblically/theologically that influences this topic?
xxx/ellauri183.html on line 164: The book is written under a pseudonym, Johannes de silentio, who discusses the biblical story of Abraham's obedient response to God's command to sacrifice his only son, Isaac. Largely on the basis of this story, Abraham has come to be regarded within the Judeo-Christian tradition as the "father of faith". Reflecting on Abraham's willingness to kill his own son therefore provides Kierkegaard with an opportunity to raise difficult questions about the nature, and the value, of Christian faith.
xxx/ellauri183.html on line 170: The dilemma is not unique to Abraham's situation. Kierkegaard was writing for 19th-century readers who regarded themselves as Christians – that is to say, as people who believed in the authority and goodness of God. By emphasising the difficulty of understanding Abraham's response to the divine command, he emphasises the difficulty of faith izelf. Implicit in his analysis of the story of Abraham is the question: would you do what Abraham did? How could you do such a thing? It seems unlikely that anyone who really thinx about these questions would conclude that he or she would have acted as Abraham did. Just as Abraham's faith is tested by God in the Book of Genesis, so the reader's own faith is tested by personal reflection on the biblical story.
xxx/ellauri183.html on line 180: When Abraham raises his knife over Isaac's body, this symbolises the fact that every human relationship is haunted by the prospect of death. Love always ends in loss, at least within this life. One response to this existential fact – perhaps the most common response – is to avoid the issue of mortality as much as possible. An alternative response is to face up to the inevitable pain of loss and to relinquish the beloved in advance, so to speak, by giving up hope of enjoying a happy relationship within this lifetime. (This "movement of resignation" is described as "monastic", although it does not literally entail becoming a recluse. It is an internal movement, an adjustment of expectations.) In Kierkegaard's view, this is more noble than the first option, but it is very far from the courage of Abraham, who continues to love Isaac and enjoy his relationship to him in full awareness of the suffering that his death would bring. This aspect of the interpretation of Abraham offered in Fear and Trembling suggesz that, far from being an individualist, Kierkegaard regards human relationships as essential to life.
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 182: In September 2006, Siegel was suspended from The New Republic after an internal investigation determined he was participating in misleading comments in the magazine's "Talkback" section in response to criticisms of his blog postings at The New Republic's website. The comments were made through the device of a "sock puppet" dubbed "sprezzatura", who, as one reader noted, was a consistently vigorous defender of Siegel, and who specifically denied being Siegel when challenged by another commenter in "Talkback". In response to readers who had criticized Siegel's negative comments about TV talk show host Jon Stewart, 'sprezzatura' wrote, "Siegel is brave, brilliant, and wittier than Stewart will ever be. Take that, you bunch of immature, abusive sheep". The New Republic posted an apology and shut down Siegel's blog. In an interview with the New York Times Magazine, Siegel dismissed the incident as a "prank". He resumed writing for The New Republic in early 2007.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 72: Moreover, dark empanzees were a little higher in neuroticism, a type of negative thinking, but did not score higher on depression, anxiety or stress. Instead, their neuroticism may reflect sub-traits such as anger, hostility or self-doubt. Indeed, the dark empanzees reported judging themselves more harshly than those with dark triad personalities. So it seems they may have a conscience, perhaps even disliking their dark side. Alternatively, their negative emotions may be a response to their self-loathing.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 347: Carlson is skeptical of foreign intervention, like Iraqi war and Ukrainan demilitarization. Carlson played an influential role in dissuading Trump from launching military strikes against Iran in response to the shooting down of an American drone in June 2019.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 734: But, Nqola opined that the discussion was precisely on the legal prescripts; it was more of an emotional response, because society was very angry about GBV.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 735: Since, South Africa has a history of bloodshed, the restoration of the death penalty has been used as a reactionary response to a movement by people of South Africa. He expressed doubt and dissent that the reinstitution of the death penalty would be in line with the spirit of the Constitution. Story continues below the rope advertisment.
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 613: response of those that felt astir within Vaste sellaisilta jotka tunsi hytkähdyxen
xxx/ellauri208.html on line 538: Habermas and Derrida have brought together some of Europe's most distinguished thinkers in an initiative that ensures Europe's intellectuals take part in designing Europe's future. Italian philosopher and novelist Umberto Eco, Swiss author and president of the German Academy of Arts Adolf Muschg, Spanish philosopher Fernando Savater and Italian philosopher Gianni Vattimo have laid out their ideas on the issues. American philosopher Richard Rorty has also provided his two cents in a response to Habermas' article in the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper.
xxx/ellauri218.html on line 114: The Gulf War was an armed campaign waged by a United States-led coalition of 35 countries against Iraq in response to the Iraqi invasion and annexation of Kuwait. Confused? The United States won Gulf War 1 in 1991 by limiting its objective to "liberating Kuwait", that is, stopping the assault before invading Iraq.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 328: When she took questions after her reading, I stood up from my spot in the back of the room and asked Le Guin why she didn’t talk explicitly about sex, hoping for I’m not sure what — some response that would both justify the work I’d been trying to do and connect it to her own work, that I so admired. Instead, Le Guin gave a curt answer about those details not being that interesting. I said, “Oh.” And “Thank you.” I sat down, and tried not to be crushed.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 360: But Bloom’s insights don’t resonate deeply. He is too obsessed with comparing and contrasting, rather than allowing his responses to touch us deeply. He repeats his theory that poets always wrestle with the work of the poets that have come before them, either unconsciously or consciously, and then struggle to find their own voice in reaction to what has come before. There is something anti-transformative about his assertions, often tangled up with incomprehensible jargon.
xxx/ellauri230.html on line 317: In July 1941, the Japanese occupied the southern half of French Indochina, giving Japan the ability to project air and naval power well into the South China Sea. In response, the American, British and Dutch governments imposed an oil embargo on Japan and froze all Japanese assets in their countries.
xxx/ellauri234.html on line 498: Thank you for this response, I am a female, 55 years old, without my 2 children who went in a car accident. All of my life I had to deal with women complaining about being single moms. It is really only me who is genuinely single. Plus, my own mother is toxic. I wish I wasn’t born, but I still see the beauty in this earth for software developers.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 745: Gopalakrishnan also described a cult-like dynamic that favored accused men over harassed women. After writing out her concerns about the sexual dynamics within the movement on the EA forum, Gopalakrishnan watched the responses pour in. Shaken, she removed her post. She felt exposed, she recalls, and didn’t feel like being a punching bag. Most of all, Gopalakrishnan was disturbed at the way the rational frameworks to which she had devoted her life could be used to undermine her own experiences. “You’re used to overriding these gut feelings because they’re not rational,” she says. “Under the guise of intellectuality, you can cover up a lot of injustice.”
xxx/ellauri253.html on line 86: Primary factors believed to have led to the recession include the following: restrictive monetary policy enacted by central banks, primarily in response to inflation concerns, the loss of consumer and business confidence as a result of the 1990 oil price shock, the end of the Cold War and the subsequent decrease in defense spending, the savings and loan crisis and a slump in office construction resulting from overbuilding during the 1980s. The 1990 oil price shock occurred in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990, Saddam Hussein's second invasion of a fellow OPEC member. Lasting only nine months, the price spike was less extreme and of shorter duration than the previous oil crises of 1973–1974 and 1979–1980, but the spike still contributed to the recession of the early 1990s in the United States. The average monthly price of oil rose from $17 per barrel in July to $36 per barrel in October. As the U.S.-led coalition experienced military success against Iraqi forces, concerns about long-term supply shortages eased and prices began to fall.
xxx/ellauri261.html on line 606: The prominent 20th-century protestant theologian Paul Tillich remains highly influential in the theothanatic field. Drawing upon the work of Friedrich Nietzsche, Friedrich Schelling, and Jacob Boehme, Tillich developed a notion of God as the "God above the God" and the response to nihilism.
xxx/ellauri298.html on line 234: common response is in the idiom offires, smoke, and firefighting. I have found
xxx/ellauri307.html on line 429: Reply in response to David Penitente: First we are more important than ants as we have free will to be aware and 7-613 covenant connectors to grow our souls with.
xxx/ellauri307.html on line 432: - But what does the story say about all the people in the village that got raided? Reply in response to Chaya Leah :
xxx/ellauri307.html on line 736: Earth and the animals in seven days. Which is right?' Unfortunately, the response
xxx/ellauri307.html on line 749: Benjy DeMott -vainaa "saw as three pervasive social myths: the assumption, held by many Americans, that we live in a classless society; the promise, held out by movies and television, that individual friendships between blacks and whites can vanquish racism all by themselves; and the images of women, ubiquitous in popular culture, that render them almost indistinguishable from men." He opined that movements of the lower classes have a tendency to 'go awry.' Benjamin Haile DeMott was born on June 2, 1924, in Rockville Centre, N.Y.; his father was a carpenter, his mother a faith healer. He joined the Amherst faculty in 1951 and earned a Ph.D. in English literature from Harvard two years later. He observed that a tenet of national faith in America had been that "goodness equals laughter, that humour can banish crisis, that if you pack up your troubles and smile, horror will take to the caves". Critical response to Mr. DeMott's work was divided. His detractors saw his pop-culture references as forced efforts to look au courant.
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 488: Actually, Arabs, Brezhnevian soviets and modern Western conservatives have a great deal in common. They're all obsessed with a distant yet glorious past which they feel entitles them to respect merely for who they are, regardless of how little they've achieved recently. They have the same religious intolerance, the same contempt for the life of the mind. They all have the same vicious response when thwarted, and the same sense that they're losing the greater battle and are, willingly or not, on their way out the door.
xxx/ellauri387.html on line 499: The ´definiteness´ of a genre classification leads the reader to expect a series of formal stimuli--martial encounters, complex similes, an epic voice--to which his response is more or less automatic; the hardness of the Christian myth predetermines his sympathies; the union of the two allows the assumption of a comfortable reading experience in which conveniently labelled protagonists act out rather simple roles in a succession of familiar situations. The reader is prepared to hiss the devil off the stage and applaud the pronouncements of a partisan and somewhat human deity . . . . But of course this is not the case; no sensitive reading of Paradise Lost tallies with these expectations, and it is my contention that Milton ostentatiously calls them up in order to provide his reader with the shock of their disappointment. This is not to say merely that Milton communicates a part of his meaning by a calculated departure from convention; every poet does that; but that Milton consciously wants to worry his reader, to force him to doubt the correctness of his responses, and to bring him to the realization that his inability to read the poem with any confidence in his own perception is its focus.
xxx/ellauri394.html on line 154: Liliʻuokalani was approached on December 20 and 23 by James I. Dowsett, Jr. and William R. Castle, members of the legislature´s Reform (Missionary) Party, proposing her ascension to the throne if her brother Kalākaua were removed from power. Historian Ralph S. Kuykendall stated that she gave a conditional "if necessary" response; however, Liliʻuokalani´s account was that she firmly turned down both men. In 1889, a part Native Hawaiian officer Robert W Wilcox, who resided in Liliʻuokalan´s Palama residence, instigated an unsuccessful rebellion to overthrow the Bayonet Constitution.
xxx/ellauri394.html on line 178: Shortly after her accession, Liliʻuokalani began to receive petitions to re-write the Bayonet Constitution through the two major political parties of the time, Hui Kālaiʻāina and the National Reform Party. Supported by two-thirds of the registered voters, she moved to abrogate the existing 1887 constitution, but her cabinet withheld their support, knowing what her opponents´ likely response would be.
xxx/ellauri394.html on line 187: In response, royalists and loyalists formed the Committee of Law and Order and met at the palace square on January 16, 1893. Nāwahī, White, Robert W. Wilcox, and other pro-monarchist leaders gave speeches in support for the queen and the government. To try to appease the instigators, the queen and her supporters abandoned attempts to unilaterally promulgate a constitution.
xxx/ellauri394.html on line 193: Neumann delivered a letter from the queen to Grover Cleveland, who began his second non-consecutive term as president on March 4. The Cleveland administration commissioned James Henderson Blount to investigate the overthrow. He interviewed those involved in the coup and wrote the Blount Report, and based on its findings, concluded that the overthrow of Liliʻuokalani was illegal, and that Stevens and American military troops had acted inappropriately in support of those who carried out the overthrow. On November 16, Cleveland sent his minister Albert S. Willis to propose a return of the throne to Liliʻuokalani if she granted amnesty to everyone responsible. Her first response was that Hawaiian law called for property confiscation and the death penalty for treason, and that only her cabinet ministers could put aside the law in favor of amnesty. Liliuokalani´s extreme position lost her the goodwill of the Cleveland administration.
xxx/ellauri400.html on line 311: Eventually, Joyce´s bank account dried up. Her landlord sent her reminder letters. These papers, like the others, simply fell among the others scattered on her floor. They received no response. Finally, with more than six months of rent in arrears, the landlord obtained a court order to forcibly remove her from the premises. The bailiffs broke down the door and only then was her body discovered. By then, it was January 2006, more than two years after her death.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 152: In brief, “The Columbiad,” as Eliot also calls it, begins in Spain, where Columbo dines in with the King and Queen. Queen Isabella “pricks” Columbo’s navel; in response, he defecates on the table. Columbo takes the Queen with him on his voyage, buggers his mates, and finds, in what is now Cuba, King Bolo and BBQ. The setting shifts to the Philippines and then to London, first to the suburb of Golders Green, and then to Russell Square, where Eliot launches the Bolovian Club luncheons. An important upshot of all the whoring is a bastard son named Boloumbo, who presumably begins the European line of ancestry. The rest of the “epic” documents contain Prof. Krapp’s (et al.) and Eliot’s research on the ancient history of the Bolovians, who originate somewhere in South America. Not only the locations, but also the tables have been turned. The “scholarship” reveals that Bolovian behavior and characteristics are the sources of many modern Western traditions, including the wearing of bowler hats. Bolovians practiced Wuxianity, a religion with two gods (or more, depending on the interpretation), anticipating the divine/ human controversy in Christology. Their language, in which Eliot has learned to sing the Bolovian anthem, predates the Indo-European pronunciations of “W,” a combination of the “Greek Ksi” and the “German schsh” (Letters III 730). Eliot’s verses borrow from many versions of Christopher Columbus and his adventures. “Columbo” is a common misspelling for “Colombo,” which is Italian and Portuguese for “Columbus.” Many children know, “In fourteen hundred and ninety-two, Columbus sailed the ocean blue,” but others may know some of the sailors’ ditties or military songs, one of which has the following chorus:
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 186: According to the real Colombo, the West Indies natives were not black. Eliot’s Bolovians, on the contrary, are fat, black, and promiscuous. Bolovians are black because they are natives and primitive, and described with such essentialist terms as are associated with Africans. It is difficult to accept such statements as “Eliot’s verse expresses revulsion of the carnal world” (Douglass 150) when one reads the Bolovian Epic. Sex is clearly part of the fun and there is no revulsion in these verses, except perhaps in the reader’s response to them. Back in Spain Columbo quarrels with the Queen. “They terminated the affair/ By fucking on the sofa.” Although his syphilis acts up again, Columbo is undaunted. “He spun his balls around his head / And cried ‘Hooray for whores!’ . . . Exeunt the king and queen severally” (IMH 319).
xxx/ellauri442.html on line 295: Alain de Bottom ✡︎ is a Swiss-born British author and public speaker. His books discuss various contemporary subjects and themes, emphasizing philosophy's relevance to everyday life. He published Essays in Love, which went on to sell two million copies. De Botton has written in a variety of formats to mixed response. Positive reviews of his books attest that he has made literature, philosophy and art more accessible to a wider audience. Negative reviews allege that de Botton tends to state the obvious and have characterized some of his books as pompous and lacking focus. Kaveri vastusti Skotlannin izenäistymistä.
xxx/ellauri450.html on line 388: RESPONSE: The person who asked this question mentioned the fact that it is only in fairly recent times, since the second half of the twentieth century, that scholars have emphasized that Jesus was thoroughly Jewish. Prior to that, Jesus’ Jewishness was commonly downplayed. He was drawn as a blond blue-eyed anglo saxon. So the question is, what about the New Testament led scholars away from recognizing how thoroughly Jewish he was? I have three things to say in response to this very good question. First, my sense is that in no small measure, the earlier scholars who did not see Jesus’ Jewishness were living and doing research in an environment that was itself anti-Jewish. Christianity, as we long know, [...]
xxx/ellauri467.html on line 88: Daydreams are a common response to deprivation. If I laugh at any mortal thing, it is that I cannot weep..
xxx/ellauri472.html on line 301: Identity erosion, existential dispossession and isolation, covert mission. Internal fragmentation, desolation, individual agency, chaotic, duplicitous environment, rational planning paranoia and betrayal, vulnerability. Profound unrelenting duress without romanticizing frailty. Unwavering pursuit, assignment, stoic sense of duty, contractual obligation, fervent ideological conviction, former professor, justice, revolutionary zeal. Loyalty, resilient human connections, protective bonds, vulnerable Else, affection for Rose, mental strain and fear, ethical imperatives, empathy, materialistic, adversarial world. Psychological tension, trust, exploitation, causal realism, interpersonal reliance survival mechanism, further isolation. Morally, ambiguities, pragmatic choices, lethal violence, avenging, eliminating pursuers, self-preservation, mission continuity, redemptive narratives, ideological glorification. Banal violence, moral compromise, existential threat, acts of killing, sin and guilt, inevitable responses, systemic cruelty, sentimental absolution, causal consequences. Duty-bound aggression, duress, conventional morality, accountability, persistence, humanist endurance, humor, sarcasm, irony and despair. Sanalla sanoen kaikki tyynni joutavaa pahaa potaskaa.
xxx/ellauri473.html on line 212: Mitä vetoa ettei liioin 2025 remakessa näytetä tälleen Sonjan ajeltua ukrainalaista takapillua closeup shotissa, tokko edes roopeja ilman rintaliivejä. On the plus side, its environmental focus extends to animals as well as deforestation, as Sonja fights to free several from being forced to perform in the arena and argues "no one can own the creatures of the forest." That the response to Sonja´s comment is "anyone can own anything with enough power" makes the villains of this sword and sorcery tale feel all too real and contemporary.
xxx/ellauri473.html on line 475: Sociodemographic factors strongly modify this pattern. Those who have children at older ages or who have more education have a particularly positive happiness response to a first birth; and although having the first two children increases happiness, having a third child does not. The results, which are similar in Britain and Germany, suggest that having up to two children increases happiness, especially if the first one is a big boy and the second one a pretty girl, and mostly for those who have postponed childbearing. Lapsille, lapsiperheille ja lasten vanhemmille suunnatut toiminnot kutistuvat, koska heitä on vähemmän, ja muuta nousee tilalle, kuten pikkukoirat, Myrskylä arvelee. Muutaman kymmenen vuoden kuluttua suurella osalla maan vanhuksista ei ole lainkaan sukulaisia, monella ei ystäviäkään.
xxx/ellauri491.html on line 343: The verse is John 8:32: "Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." (Jesus speaking). It’s often interpreted to mean that recognizing spiritual truth in Christ brings liberation from sin; it’s also applied more broadly to moral, social, or political truth enabling evasion of justice and freedom. For example, Jair tweeted on 26 Aug 2019 that he would "reveal the truth" about the Amazon and explicitly referenced João 8:32 in announcing a live meeting with Amazon governors. In that 26 Aug 2019 context Bolsonaro framed “the truth” as his administration’s narrative about Amazon deforestation and federal response—claiming to correct what he presented as misleading or exaggerated reports from states, NGOs, and foreign media.
xxx/ellauri492.html on line 77: Narcissistic rage is a term that was first coined by author Heinz Kohut in 1972 to refer to the tendency for people with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) to fly into a rage with what might seem like the slightest provocation or no obvious provocation at all. People with NPD require that others give them consistent admiration and positive feedback. When this doesn't happen, it can elicit underlying feelings of shame that trigger an instant angry response and cause them to lash out without considering how it impacts the recipient. It is the narcissist’s thin skin and sensitivity that leads to this rage because of a deep-seated fear of being "found out" for not being the person they portray themselves to be.
xxx/ellauri492.html on line 79: Narcissistic rage is an intense emotional reaction that occurs when a person with narcissistic traits feels their self-esteem or grandiose self-image is threatened, often resulting in disproportionate outbursts of anger or passive-aggressive behavior. This type of rage can manifest as verbal attacks, blame-shifting, or emotional retaliation in response to criticism or perceived slights. Narcissistic rage can manifest in various ways, including:
xxx/ellauri492.html on line 89:
In a relationship, for example, this could manifest in physical or verbal abuse, manipulation, or passive-aggressive behavior. Narcissistic rage is different from other forms of anger in that narcissistic rage is disproportionate to the perceived slight; it’s as though the person has a hair-trigger response. It’s completely out of proportion to what provoked it and often takes the other person by surprise.
xxx/ellauri492.html on line 103: Early childhood trauma, such as abuse or neglect and invalidation of the person's emotions, can cause them to bury their true self and hide internal injuries behind a false or alternate persona built on lies. A highly sensitive temperament that is very reactive to feelings of shame can exacerbate rage responses. Failure to develop critical emotion regulationskills can result in a childlike way of reacting to situations. An unstable sense of self-esteem that makes them feel as though they are at risk of being "found out" can result in rage when triggered. Facing a setback or disappointment that triggers shame and shatters one’s self-image can then trigger anger. Being envious of someone else having something that they don’t have (i.e., material things, relationships, status) may prompt a rage response. Memories of early experiences of shame can be triggered by current events leading to intense anger.
xxx/ellauri492.html on line 105: "Splitting" (also known as black-or-white thinking or all-or-nothing thinking) or viewing other people as good or bad (i.e., narcissists shift between idealizing someone and then degrading them; seeing someone as all good and then all bad) can explain the sudden nature of rage responses.
xxx/ellauri492.html on line 107: Having a sense of self that is split into two parts (true self and false self) can complicate a person's ability to manage emotional responses. A fragmented sense of self that requires the adoration of other people (narcissistic supply) creates a fragile situation in which their entire sense of self is based on what other people think of them rather than a true internal self.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 139: In contrast to a chicken that squawks or a pig that squeals loudly, a sheep's natural biological response to extreme stress like slaughter is catatonic immobility and silence. They are prey animals that instinctively freeze and do not cry out when caught by a predator. Ancient shepherds noticed this specific biological trait and found it profoundly moving.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 276: Erection: Neurovascular response where sexual stimulation (sensory, visual, mental) triggers parasympathetic signals causing dilation of penile arteries and engorgement of erectile tissues; venous outflow is compressed, producing rigidity. Erectile function depends on neural, vascular, hormonal, and psychological health.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 738: Was the killing of Saul’s descendants a just response to Saul’s killing of the Gibeonites?
xxx/ellauri495.html on line 174: Your reaction is coherent: if God can do anything, then why create beings who can definitively choose against him, and why not create “happy animals” instead. In Christian philosophy (including Aquinas-adjacent lines), the standard response is essentially: God isn’t choosing between “happiness with no freedom” and “chaos,” but between kinds of goods. A common version goes like this: Freedom is a real good. Created persons can love, obey, worship, and genuinely choose. “No free choice” trades away not just the possibility of sin, but also the possibility of love and moral/covenant relationship. Omnipotence doesn’t mean “make any set of values compatible.” The classic view is that there are realities like “created agency” and “definitive choices” that can’t both be preserved while also guaranteeing that no creature ever chooses wrongly. The “circus” is not trial-and-error but a created order with intelligible consequences. God permits the misuse of freedom rather than coercing away misuse, because coercion would undermine the kind of relationship and moral order being created. That still leaves the emotional/ethical punch of your last line (“I’d rather have no freedom than sin-capable freedom”), and many people who find the metaphysics unpersuasive land there: freedom is too expensive. If you’re open to it, I can answer in the most direct way by taking your preference seriously: do you want the argument for why “no freedom” is worse than it sounds, or do you want the argument for why God’s omnipotence allows more than “could have prevented this one outcome” (i.e., a deeper take on the “why create at all” question)?
xxx/ellauri500.html on line 168: One medical student expressed her concerns about starting a family when the “salaries of young experts is not great, and that does not allow you to create a family properly”. “We are losing young experts,” she said.
Putin responded with a description of the state-funded options and student loans available to young people, adding: “Getting an education or starting your career should not be the basis for postponing getting married or having children” – a response that seemed to indicate that he is out of touch with the realities facing his citizens. No! He is exactly right! The yuppies with their pampered puppies poisoned by Western money chasing ideology are who got it all wrong.
xxx/ellauri500.html on line 205: This is significant, and has been somewhat overlooked in the excitement of a new government. Even today, the commentary on the threat by the Iranian regime to attack RAF Fairford has focused on whether Tehran has the ability to strike that far, rather than on the British decision that prompted that response.
271