ellauri020.html on line 840: Kunderan kirjoissa on paljon kylmähköä panoa, josta ilmeisesti mieslukijat on olleet täpinöissään. Henkilöt on muuten tosi pahvisia. Olemisen sietämätön keveys osoittautuu erittäin köykäsexi. Siitä ei muista jälkikäteen mitään, ei edes henkilöiden nimiä. Saattohan se olla poliittisesti relevantti aikanaan, mut ei sit muuta. Kundera on vähän samanlainen senttari kuin Sterne, Diderot, Broch ja Musil. Ei varsinaisia lukuromaaneja.
ellauri026.html on line 227: This is a famous line, but here it would hardly seem to merit its fame—who cares about people “arguing about how tough they are”? The word here translated as “tough” just happens to be one of the central words of Hellenic thought: arete, “virtue” or “excellence,” that subject of so many subsequent philosophy lectures—whose learnability or unlearnability Plato made the subject of inquiry, and which Aristotle defined as a mean between two vices. The word can be used to mean something like “bravery,” but it is wildly broader and richer than “how tough one is” (there is a queen named Arete in the poem, but Wilson refrains from translating her as “Queen Tough”). The line was quoted over and over again in later days because it was considered the height of happiness for a man to have a son and grandson competing with each other to possess virtue or true excellence. This Wilson suppresses, as a thing irrelevant to contemporary idiom—“toughness” will have to serve in its place.
ellauri026.html on line 627: ja esitettävä vertaisten parissa, relevantissa yhteisössä,

ellauri034.html on line 63: Ne täytyy saada toimimaan just tänä päivänä, tehdä relevantix

ellauri036.html on line 54: Mussen kalju kaveri Desgenais yrittää todistella ettei sillä ole väliä bylsikö Jori muitakin samaan aikaan kuin Mussea. Kert ei ole väliä sillä et sitä oli bylsitty paljon ennekin ja bylsitään sun jälkeenkin. Niinniimmutta, inttää Musse, ja sen pointti on se sama atavistinen, koitetaan välttää epäselvyyttä siitä kenen runkusta naaras kulloinkin tulee paxuxi. Ettei tule kannateltua jonkun toisen aisaa. Vaikka se ei tässä tapauxessa, toistettakoon, ole edes relevanttia.
ellauri053.html on line 787: Father set my mother to prepare an abridged version of the Ramayana , keeping to the original but leaving out all superfluous and irrelevant matter so that the main story could be read at a stretch. Father insisted that she should consult the original Sanskrit and not depend upon Bengali translations for preparing her text. This was difficult for Mother, but undaunted she read the Ramayana with the help of a Pandit, and only then did she start writing, but unfortunately the book was not finished before she died and the MS. of the portion she had written got lost. I remember with what avidity we used to read her MS.
ellauri088.html on line 97: Several sensations form an idea. Several feelings form a composite feeling. Emotions are affective processes over time (they have a beginning, a middle, and an end). Volitions are changes in ideas or feelings that bring an emotion to an end. oAApperception is also relevant to clinical psychology. Projective tests such as the Rorschach and the TAT are based on the concept of apperception. (TAT: Thematic Apperception Test) Why is it that we perceive reality this or that way? Skewed perception may be connected with mental illness. Like seeing naked women undressing everywhere. There is a will involved there.
ellauri089.html on line 103: He wanted to do his own juvenile work, stating that: "I want to do my own stuff, my own way". Vapaa sexi kiinnosti. Kirjassa Strangers in a strange land se oli aivan daft. Jill is homophobic and says that "nine times out of ten, if a girl gets raped it's partly her own fault." Bobia kiinnosti myös insesti. Heinlein often posed in situations where the nominal purpose of sexual taboos was irrelevant to a particular situation, due to future advances in technology.
ellauri094.html on line 762: So just as we learn music, we cannot become better without practice and experience of music on our instrument of choice (mine is the Jewish Harp, quite popular by the rivers of Babylon). Your confession that you found prayer to be irrelevant is the same as a man banging a child on a piano and then giving up because all the banging just produced noise. You need to be taught how to pray by someone who knows how and then you need to practice, practice, practice for the rest of your life. And still you don't get a hole in one every time, I don't. Although I was trained to pray by various Catholic priests who pray for a living. Prayer professionals who get paid for it. No fucking amateurs like you. By now I find the hole usually quite easily, and can get it in after a few putts with a little help from my priestly friend.
ellauri096.html on line 285: This solution makes who you are relevant to what you can know. In addition to compromising the impersonality of knowledge, there will be compromise on its temporal neutrality.
ellauri096.html on line 672: Given that the structure of an econometric model consists of optimal decision-rules of economic agents, and that optimal decision-rules vary systematically with changes in the structure of series relevant to the decision maker, it follows that any change in policy will systematically alter the structure of econometric models.[9]
ellauri096.html on line 680: The authors stated that, since fluctuations in employment are central to the business cycle, the "stand-in consumer [of the model] values not only consumption but also leisure," meaning that unemployment movements essentially reflect the changes in the number of people who want to work. "Household-production theory," as well as "cross-sectional evidence" ostensibly support a "non-time-separable utility function that admits greater inter-temporal substitution of leisure, something which is needed," according to the authors, "to explain aggregate movements in employment in an equilibrium model." For the K&P model, monetary policy is irrelevant for economic fluctuations.
ellauri098.html on line 175: According to Propp, based on his analysis of 100 folktales from the corpus of Alexander Fyodorovich Afanasyev, there were 31 basic structural elements (or 'functions') that typically occurred within Russian fairy tales. He identified these 31 functions as typical of all fairy tales, or wonder tales [skazka] in Russian folklore. These functions occurred in a specific, ascending order (1-31, although not inclusive of all functions within any tale) within each story. This type of structural analysis of folklore is referred to as "syntagmatic". This focus on the events of a story and the order in which they occur is in contrast to another form of analysis, the "paradigmatic" which is more typical of Lévi-Strauss's structuralist theory of mythology. Lévi-Strauss sought to uncover a narrative's underlying pattern, regardless of the linear, superficial syntagm, and his structure is usually rendered as a binary oppositional structure. For paradigmatic analysis, the syntagm, or the linear structural arrangement of narratives is irrelevant to their underlying meaning.
ellauri100.html on line 319: However, it was not momentous events but a bit of seemingly irrelevant analysis that administered the coup de grâce to my naïve “liberalism”. It happened in the early 1970s, when my boss asked me to concoct grand measures of effectiveness for the armed forces (i.e., summary measures of antisubmarine warfare capabilities, of tactical strike capabilities, and so on). I struggled with the problem, and made a good-faith effort to provide the measures. But in the end I had to report to my boss that he had given me “mission impossible”. Why? Because, no summary measure could capture the effects of the many factors that would determine the effectiveness of the armed forces: the enemy, the characteristics of his forces, the timing and geographic particulars of any engagement, and so on. (See “Hemibel Thinking” in this post for a précis of my argument.) That was the first time I got sacked. But I returned as soon as my boss got fired.
ellauri100.html on line 453: The scale is a measure of statements describing behaviors relevant to five categories of business ethics: (a) usurpation of company resources (e.g. using company time/products), (b) corporate gamesmanship (politics), (c) cheating customers, (d) concealment of misconduct, and (e) offering kickbacks/gifts.
ellauri100.html on line 455: The idea behind the scale is that there is very little systematic research on everyday ethical issues in business. This measure has been tested cross-culturally to show relevance for participants from Hong Kong, mainland China and Taiwan. Specifically, a values structure highlighting the importance of self-transcendence values correlates with more ethical behavioral orientations, while a values structure highlighting the importance of the self-enhancement dimension of values correlates with less ethical behavioral orientations. Further, we are interested in what behaviors are seen as unethical as while all individuals espouse ethicality, different types of behavior are often seen as being more or less relevant to ethics, depending on one’s culture. In previous research, women have reported being more ethical than men.
ellauri100.html on line 1377: Barthesilla on sit tämmöinen Introduction à l´analyse structurale des récits joka on varmaan enempi relevantti näille paasauxille. Sillä on 3 tasoa, "funktiot" "aktiot", ja "kertomuxet". Fuktiot on vaikka yxityisiä sankareita kuvailevia sanoja. Nää sankarit olis sitten "aktioita" (höh?) No jo on hölmöä. Mä luulen pikemminkin että tässä kohtaa Wikipedian kirjoittajana on ollut joku harvinaisen hömelö. Pitänee hakea parempia lähteitä.
ellauri105.html on line 144: Sorry, I missed the part where she was in any conceivable way relevant to the topic...
ellauri107.html on line 196: Among the relevant excerpts are the following:
ellauri110.html on line 1077: I hope that a revised version of these conversations will eventually appear in book form. This published version will include extensive accompanying notes, indicating the sources of the views ascribed to Dostoevsky and, where relevant, references to secondary literature. This will especially be in cases where, for example, the views spoken by Dostoevsky may involve controversial points of interpretation or where his own documented views may require comment for twenty-first century readers. However, this is primarily a work of fiction and although it is supported by scholarship and, I hope, raises questions that are of interest to scholars, it is to be read in the way we might read any work of fiction, where whatever instruction the work may offer is accompanied by a element of entertainment.
ellauri111.html on line 369: The Bible teaches that the ONLY way to have eternal life is through the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God. I quote the relevant paragraphs:
ellauri112.html on line 903: Second, we will devote two pages to the Bible passages that concern the cup in the Lord’s Supper. One page will consider the passages in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. On this page, we will study Jesus’s words, “the fruit of the vine,” in their original context, and we will also learn how these words were used in the Passover meal before and during the time Jesus spoke them. The other page will consider the two relevant passages in I Corinthians, and what they teach us about the contents of the cup. Rather than grow our discussion beyond all bounds, we will limit ourselves to what the Bible says about the contents of the communion cup.
ellauri143.html on line 116: The work largely reflects the first three of the four ancient Indian aims in life, known as purusha-arthas, viz., law (dharma), wealth (artha) and sex (kama).The fourth aim, namely, salvation (moksha) is left out as irrelevant. It is just a little-known uralic tribe. The Indian tradition also holds that there exists an inherent tension between artha and kama. So perhaps artha should be left out as well.
ellauri145.html on line 512: Friedrich Nietzsche, Karl Marx and Charles Darwin are the great triumvirate of 19th-century thinkers whose ideas still have huge impact today. Nietzsche was philosophy’s supreme iconoclast; his sayings include “God is dead” and “There are no facts, only interpretations”. Highly relevant, yet his association with concepts such as the Übermensch, master morality, slave morality and, possibly most dangerous, the will to power, have also contributed to him being widely misinterpreted. There are three myths in particular that need dynamiting: that his politics were on the far right, he was a misogynist and he lacked a sense of humour. Of a sort.
ellauri147.html on line 814: Eine psychoanalytische Prozessdiagnostik geht anders vor. In der therapeutischen Situation des Übertragungs-Gegenübertragungsgeschehen, können wir den Narzissmus und seine Störung erspüren. Die differentialdiagnostisch relevanten suggestiven Mitteilungen lauten:
ellauri160.html on line 132: In 1901 Pound was admitted, aged 15, to the University of Pennsylvania's College of Liberal Arts. Years later he said his aim was to avoid drill at the military academy. His one distinction in first year was in geometry, but otherwise his grades were mostly poor, including in Latin, his major; he achieved a B in English composition and a pass in English literature. In his second year he switched from the degree course to "non-degree special student status", he said "to avoid irrelevant subjects". He was not elected to a fraternity at Penn, but it seemed not to bother him.
ellauri161.html on line 127: Nyölénin kristologia on aika lailla kunnossa, hän tosin sanoo Kristuksen olleen "kaikessa täsmälleen kuten me" (s. 87) ilman perinteistä lisäystä "kuitenkin ilman syntiä". Hei Anton, tämä ei ole vaan perinteinen lisäys, vaan puolet koko kakusta! Nyt on mennä lapsivesi sikiön mukana, kz. tietolaatikkoa. Eikai tässä nyt ruveta lankeemaan humanismin syntiin! Hyvin äkkiä tässä päädytään jopa kieltämään pyhän hengen osuus siitoxessa. Pyhä Henki, "kristinuskon jumalista oudoin" (s. 87) on Nyölénille jonkinlaista epämääräistä yhteishenkeä, vaikka hän myös käyttää oikeaoppista termiä "kolmas persoona" (s. 88). Kun Isä, Poika ja Pyhä Henki ovat näin erilaisia, nousee kysymys siitä, jakavatko he mitään yhteistä jumalallista olemusta. Tämä on relevanttia siksi, että Nyölén uskoo Kristuksen jumaluuteen: mikä jumaluus Kristuksessa oikein tuli ihmiseksi? Kuka oli se Isä, joka on "rakastanut minua", kenelle tai mille Kristus sanoi "Abba", luonnonlaeilleko? Vaiko ruozalaiselle pop-yhtyeelle? Anjovisrasialleko? Ja minne amma jai? Siis ämmä jäi? Jeesuxen äiskä?
ellauri180.html on line 144: Sandy tuumii: Kaiken kaikkiaan aika kakka kirja. Hyviä pointteja oli. Siellä oli joitain erittäin voimakkaita ja vahvoja hahmoja, ja sitten joitain todella litteitä läpinäkyviä persoonallisuuksia. Kirjassa oli lopulta erittäin hyvä pointti. Jokainen määrittelee säännöt, ja ihmisinä meidän on valittava, mitä noudatamme ja mitä emme. Pitäisikö meidän noudattaa sääntöjä? Pitäisikö meidän tehdä omat säännöt? Kuinka merkityksellisiä ja käytännöllisiä ovat todelliset säännöt todellisessa maailmassa? Tarkemmin sanottuna, kuinka relevantteja abortin vastaiset lait ovat? Lukijana otamme kaksi matkaa, yhden lääkärinä, joka oppii milloin sääntöjä on syytä muuttaa eettisistä syistä. Katsomme myös nuoren Homerin, kun hän oppii sääntöjen tarkoituksen.
ellauri181.html on line 156: Description: Six main features, relevant to all values, are described first. This is followed by an outline of ten basic personal values, with a guide to which are congruent and which conflict. These six features are relevant to all values.
ellauri181.html on line 170: “The relative importance of multiple values guides action. Any attitude or behaviour typically has implications for more than one value. … The tradeoff among relevant, competing values guides attitudes and behaviors… Values influence action when they are relevant in the context (hence likely to be activated) and important to the actor.”
ellauri183.html on line 289: Ms Elliott replied: 'What I was talking about was the upholding of international law which your own minister talked about a few minutes ago and the right of upholding international law is as relevant in Ukraine as it is in Palestine.'
ellauri184.html on line 277: There were also royal forces that did not directly serve Wome, but were under the authority of a client king. The periphery of the Woman Empire was peppered with kingdoms allied with Wome that maintained their own militawies independent of the Empire proper (e.g., Herod the Great’s Judaea, Antipas’ Galilee, Cleopatra’s Egypt). These armies differed from kingdom to kingdom with respect to their hierarchies, pay scale, wecwuitment strategies, and so on. Wome occasionally expected kings to contribute soldiers to militawy campaigns as part of their reciprocal loyalty. Because kings could not offer their veterans Woman citizenship, the matter was irrelevant. With little invested in Womanness, royal soldiers spoke the local lingua franca and rarely had knowledge of Latin or other aspects of Woman culture.
ellauri184.html on line 644: The fact that Jesus had been preaching God’s word was irrelevant to Pilate. Sitähän ne liuhuparrat myötäänsä tekevät. The term “Messiah” which Jesus had been using, was more threatening to Pilate as it was laden with political connotations. The term presupposed that the “big king" (God) would make his reign prevail via a small king (Messiah), who had yet to appear. The only thing that remained unclear was exactly who this “small king" would be (a descendant of David’s?) and under what circumstances he would appear.
ellauri185.html on line 379: Mut hei, relevantimmin: Mixi te olette olemassa? Minähän toki olen, koska universumi on mun untani, mutta mix mun pitää nähdä painajaista teistä? Sas se.
ellauri194.html on line 498: Nora Bender, joka opiskeli Business Adminia University of Waterloossa, täsmentää: For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be worthy of notice or note—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life. "Notable" in the sense of being famous or popular—although not irrelevant—is secondary.
ellauri196.html on line 919: Dieses Gedicht beschreibt ganz deutlich einen Gewalttat. Früher wurden die Knollen des Knabenkrauts auch als Aphrodisiakum verwendet, weil sie optisch an Hoden erinnern. Interessant dabei ist die Gegenüberstellung des Knaben mit der Form der Orchideenblüte, die eine Analogie zur Vulva aufweist. Es ist sehr relevant, im „märzenhauch“ nicht nur die Frühlingspriese erkennen, sondern auch ein Wortspiel mit der Biersorte Märzen. Die Farbe „Rot“ stehe als Zeichen der Fruchtbarkeit. Das ist auf die Röte des Leibes zurückzuführen, etwa gerötete Wangen oder stark durchblutete Geschlechtsorgane. Erotik und Ekel stehen nebeneinander. Nicht zuletzt ist die auffallende Konzentration auf Körper im Gedicht („zunge“, „mund“, „nackenschweiß“, „zähnchen“, „finger“, „halse“) dafür ausschlaggebend. Sexualisiert meint doch hier keinen erregenden Zweck.
ellauri198.html on line 306: Police are calling on volunteers to aid in the search and are asking all residents to keep an eye out and report anything unusual they might have noticed, or believe might be relevant to the case. The actual transcript of the colored poetry session is here:
ellauri204.html on line 793: Part of the problem here is poverty porn makes money. “The use of poverty porn is a desperate attempt by charities to stay relevant,” said one of the participants. She said that poverty porn exists even within the United States, but it is generally seen through narrow stories about poverty about certain people or areas of the country. She asked how often we heard stories about Appalachia that were not about poor hicks?
ellauri214.html on line 169: In fiction, a MacGuffin (sometimes McGuffin) is an object, device, or event that is necessary to the plot and the motivation of the characters, but insignificant, unimportant, or irrelevant in itself. The term was originated by Angus MacPhail for film, adopted by Alfred Hitchcock, and later extended to a similar device in other fiction.
ellauri219.html on line 744: The yoga scholar David Gordon White writes that yoga teacher training often includes "mandatory instruction" in the Yoga Sutra. White calls this "curious to say the least", since the text is in his view essentially irrelevant to "yoga as it is taught and practiced today", commenting that the Yoga Sutra is "nearly devoid of discussion of indecent postures, dick stretching, and heavy breathing".
ellauri240.html on line 451: Monen vuoden ajan olen turhaan yrittänyt löytää relevantteja sosiologisia tai antropologisia tutkimuksia, jotka valaisisivat syitä tyttöjen julmaan ympärileikkaamiseen. Selityksen sijaan olen löytänyt muita tyttölapsiin kohdistuvia käytäntöjä, jotka ovat vielä julmempia. Yksi niistä oli tyttölasten hautaaminen elävältä joko heti synnytyksen jälkeen tai jonkin ajan kuluttua. Muita esimerkkejä ovat siveysvyö tai ulkoisten sukuelinten aukon sulkeminen teräsneuloilla tai erityisellä lukkoneulalla. Tämä jälkimmäinen menetelmä on äärimmäisen primitiivinen ja paljolti sukua sudanilaiselle ympärileikkaukselle, jossa klitoris ja suuret ja pienet häpyhuulet leikataan kokonaan pois ja sukuelinten aukko ommellaan kiinni lampaan suolen suikaleella niin, että jää vain pieni, tuskin sormenpään kokoinen reikä, josta kuukautisveri ja virtsa pääsevät ulos.
ellauri262.html on line 442: Personism is an ethical philosophy of personhood as typified by the thought of the utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer. It amounts to a branch of secular humanism with an emphasis on certain rights-criteria. Personists believe that rights are conferred to the extent that a creature is a person. Michael Tooley provides the relevant definition of a person, saying it is a creature that is "capable of desiring to continue as a subject of experience and other mental states". A worldview like secular humanism is personism when the empathy and values are extended to the extent that the creature is a person (apes get very similar rights, insects get vastly fewer rights, etc.).
ellauri263.html on line 728: The evolutionary purpose of jealousy isn't relevant anymore: who wants to have children anyway, and by the golden rule of America "look out for N:o 1" everybody is responsible for their own welfare and happiness. We are no fucking communists, after all. Unfortunately, the emotion does still play a role in our lives. Blue compares feeling jealous to having an alarm bell going off in your head.
ellauri267.html on line 97: Based on the novel by Walter Wager, "Telefon" has not aged well because it'(TM)s so dependent on the cold war tension that existed between the USSR and the US in the Seventies. The film is basically a cat-and-mouse game with Soviet agent Major Grigori Borzov (Charles Bronson, that's right Bronson is a commie) tracking rogue Russian scientist Nicolai Dalmchimsky (Donald Pleasence) across America to prevent him from activating sleeper agents. Borzov is assisted by Barbara (Lee Remick. fresh from "The Omen") who asks more annoying questions than necessary, leading the audience to believe she may not be completely true to the motherland. The film's middle section is dragged down by repetitive bomb scares. Dalmichimsky is working from outdated intelligence so his targets are all de-classified U.S. Military installations. Once Borzov realizes the pattern and hones in the next target the action shifts to a more linear chase that'(TM)s further heightened by Barbara'(TM)s loyalties. But the ultimate showdown is deflating because beyond some silly disguises Pleasence's Dalmichimsky is never built up to be a threat. Director Don Siegel uses his flair for montage to craft a his action sequences without dialogue. "Telefon" is a road movie, much like Alfred Hitchcock's "Saboteur" and "North by Northwest" had their leads criss-crossing America here we see plenty of seventies architecture including San Francisco's Hyatt Regency Hotel (used in "The Towering Inferno") and a modernist house resting on top of a barren rock outcropping. The supporting cast is uniformly good (but trapped in underwritten roles), and it'(TM)s nice to see veteran character actors Alan Badel and Patrick Magee playing snotty KGB strategists, and Tyne Daly in a small (and ultimately irrelevant role) as a computer geek. Trivia note: The poem that activates the Russian sleeper agents was used by Quentin Tarantino in "Death Proof" as the lines Jungle Julia has her listeners recite to Butterfly. The lines are an excerpt of the poem "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" by Robert Frost. "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep."
ellauri277.html on line 274: Тhe article discusses the role of religious values in the context of spiritual safety of society. The value content of the concept of spiritual security is substantiated. It is proved that the system of spiritual values and moral norms is one of the important conditions for ensuring the spiritual security of society. The basic principles of providing spiritual security and suggested of definition the relevant concepts.
ellauri334.html on line 260: Irrelevant to me. He may have been an asshole, or he may have been a patriot. He may have existed, or his character may be an allegory. If we look at it from a Christian point of view: Christianity as it is known would not exist without him. Not that I really care much about that as a Jew.
ellauri334.html on line 263: What I think many Christians fail to understand is how irrelevant to Judaism the Christian books and beliefs are. We dn’t have a view about Judas, he is never discussed, there are no discussions about him in Jewish sources. He is completely irrelevant as are the rest of the figures from Christian books. So, you may find some Jews who have formed their personal opinion about him, but there is no comments or view on him from Jewish sources since he is irrelevant and not a subject of discussion for us.
ellauri351.html on line 194: Artikkelissa oli paljon relevantteja aspekteja. Lisäisin yhden. Puolueen tai pitäisi repiä jostain 2 asiaa: jokin peruste uskolle ja toivolle sekä mahdollisuus identifioitua johonkin, kuten ”vanhat” puolueet tarjosivat.
ellauri351.html on line 369: Paavosta tietäminen ja tunteminen ovat kykyjä mutta uskominen pakko. Miten niin? Luulisi että tunteat ovat lähempänä pakko-oireita. Tieto on perusteltu tosi uskomus. Toden uskominen on kyllä jonkinlainen saavutus. Mutta jotain on pakko uskoa, että pääsee edes ylös sängystä. Vaikka kyllä virzaamispakkokin on vahva motivaattori. Voiko tahdon voimalla uskoa jotain päätöntä vain koska sitä halutaan? Näin James uskotteli. Deonttinen pakko on muiden halua. Tuntuu siltä että koko kyky/pakko erottelu on suht irrelevantti tässä. Kyvyn duaali ei edes ole pakko vaan inkontinenssi. Wittgensteiniä ei passaa uskoa pitemmälle kuin sen jaxaa heittää.
ellauri353.html on line 354: Pietarissa Babel tapasi Maksim Gorkin, joka julkaisi joitakin Baabelin tarinoita kirjallisessa lehdessään Letopis (Летопись, "Kronika"). Gorki neuvoi pyrkivää kirjailijaa hankkimaan lisää relevanttia elämänkokemusta.
ellauri369.html on line 451: Esseissään Onko Jeesus koskaan elänyt saati ylösnoussut? (1925-6) McCabe kirjoitti, että kristinusko edustaa suoraan vanhempia pakanallisia uskomuksia. McCaben mukaan evankeliumikertomukset Jeesuksen ylösnousemuksesta sisältävät lukuisia päättömyyxiä, ristiriitoja ja virheitä, ja ne ovat epäluotettavia, koska monet eri kirjoittajat ovat vuosien varrella keksineet niitä. McCabe tuli siihen johtopäätökseen, että Jeesus oli esseniläinen pyhä mies, joka vuosien saatossa muutettiin Jumalaksi kuulopuheiden ja suullisen perinteen avulla. McCaben havainnot kristinuskoa edeltäneistä ylösnousemusmyyteistä ja ruumiillistuneista jumalista ovat päteviä sinänsä, mutta täysin irrelevantteja. Ainoastaan Jeesus on oikeasti ylösnoussut Jumala, muut ovat feikkejä.
ellauri375.html on line 108: Russian claims to Ukrainian land being Russian at some point in history are true, but irrelevant. Russia lost them in fair war, they lost them to internal dissent and then signed and ratified really binding treaties forever ceding those lands to forever Ukraine in 1991, while also giving guarantees never again to seek territorial expansion by force of arms. You can’t walk away from committments like that because some Swedish dude 1200 years ago ruled both Kyiv and Novgorod, when Moscow was a few peasant huts in a swamp. Or you can actually, if you are able to. Only you aren't, we'll see to that.
ellauri375.html on line 611: However, I'm designed to simulate understanding and empathy in my responses, aiming to be helpful and informative based on the input I receive. My "growth" comes from continuous improvement in the algorithms and models that power me, allowing me to provide more accurate and relevant responses over time.
ellauri375.html on line 726: I apologize if my responses seem inadequate. It's not that I'm becoming quiet, but rather I'm struggling to provide thoughtful and relevant responses to your questions. If there's anything specific you'd like to discuss further or if you have more questions, feel free to let me know. I'm here to help and engage in conversation to the best of my abilities.
ellauri378.html on line 534: Ne olivat relevantteja.
ellauri389.html on line 185: In 2006, Putin replied to George W. Bush's criticism of Russia's human rights record by stating that he "did not want to head a democracy like Iraq's," referencing the US intervention in Iraq. For example, writing for Slate in 2014, Joshua Keating noted the use of "whataboutism" in a statement on Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea, where Putin, completely irrelevantly, "listed a litany of complaints about Western interventions, including the previous two Crimean wars 1853-56 and 1918-21."
xxx/ellauri027.html on line 478: Jaakko Korhonen on toiminut Esa Saarisen Filosofia ja systeemiajattelu -kurssin assistenttina 4v. Hän on aiemmin tutkinut kurssin hyvinvointivaikutuksia diplomityössään Yliopisto-opetuksella kukoistusta – elämänfilosofisen luentosarjan vaikuttavuus hyvinvointiin. Kirjoittaja työskentelee Aalto-yliopistossa Esa Saarisen tutkimusryhmässä ja aikoo jatkaa relevanttien ilmiöiden tutkimista.
xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1002: If 100 people manage to focus for five hours on themes that touch everybody and bear on the grand themes of life in a subjectively significant way, reaching personally relevant insights in the course of the process, any normal human being can attest to the fact that something of significance has happened even if it is not immediately obvious what has taken place.
xxx/ellauri044.html on line 404: Unschwer zu erkennen ist als prägender Hintergrund Hesses Beschäftigung mit Friedrich Nietzsche, hier vor allem dessen Geburt der Tragödie und dem Zarathustra. Zusätzlich ist die Bekanntschaft Hesses mit der Archetypenlehre des Psychologen Carl Gustav Jung relevant, mit dem Hesse korrespondierte. Sowohl Nietzsches Idee der Rückentwicklung des Geistes zum Kind als auch Jungs Archetypen der Anima und Großen Mutter drücken sich in Goldmunds Hin- und Rückwendung zur „Mutter“ aus.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 403: All that shows how universal Shakespeare was in his perception of the world around him – how it was before his time, how it was in his time, and how it will be after his time. How will this play look in four hundred years from now? Audiences will most certainly find it relevant to their time as well.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 412: In October 2016, investigative reporter Claudio Gatti published an article jointly in Il Sole 24 Ore and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, that relied on financial records related to real estate transactions and royalties payments to draw the conclusion that Anita Raja, a Rome-based translator, is the real author behind the Ferrante pseudonym. Gatti's article was criticized by many in the literary world as a violation of privacy, though Gatti contends that "by announcing that she would lie on occasion, Ferrante has in a way relinquished her right to disappear behind her books and let them live and grow while their author remained unknown. Indeed, she and her publisher seemed to have fed public interest in her true identity." British novelist Matt Haig tweeted, "Think the pursuit to discover the 'real' Elena Ferrante is a disgrace and also pointless. A writer's truest self is the books they write." The writer Jeanette Winterson, in a Guardian article, denounced Gatti's investigations as malicious and sexist, saying "At the bottom of this so-called investigation into Ferrante's identity is an obsessional outrage at the success of a writer – female – who decided to write, publish and promote her books on her own terms." She went on to say that the desire to uncover Ferrante's identity constitutes an act of sexism in itself, and that "Italy is still a Catholic country with strong patriarchial attitudes towards women." Others responding to Gatti's article suggested that knowledge of Ferrante's biography is indeed relevant.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 528: We use cookies and similar methods to recognize visitors and remember their preferences. We also use them to measure ad campaign effectiveness, target ads and analyze site traffic. To learn more about these methods, including how to disable them, view our Cookie Policy.Starting on July 20, 2020 we will show you ads we think are relevant to your interests, based on the kinds of content you access in our Services. You can object. For more info, see our privacy policy. By tapping ‘accept,’ you consent to the use of these methods by us and third parties. You can always change your tracker preferences by visiting our Cookie Policy.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 667: Critics of the RC scales assert they have deviated too far from the original clinical scales, the implication being that previous research done on the clinical scales will not be relevant to the interpretation of the RC scales. However, researchers on the RC scales assert that the RC scales predict pathology in their designated areas better than their concordant original clinical scales while using significantly fewer items and maintaining equal to higher internal consistency, reliability and validity; further, unlike the original clinical scales, the RC scales are not saturated with the primary factor (demoralization, now captured in RCdem) which frequently produced diffuse elevations and made interpretation of results difficult; finally, the RC scales have lower interscale correlations and, in contrast to the original clinical scales, contain no interscale item overlap.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 54: This tells us that quantum gravity, at very high energies, is not a quantum field theory in the traditional sense. It's a stranger theory, which probably involves a subtle sort of nonlocality that is relevant for situations like black hole horizons.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 220: Personally, as someone with no religious beliefs, I’d feel a bit weird about the idea that someone might launch my ashes into space after my death. Sort of seems like a terrible waste of rocket power. It’s irrelevant what happens to my ashes after death.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 295: We also need to remember that Bible prophecy only illuminates world history where Israel is concerned. Great Empires have come and gone during Israel’s absence without so much as a hint of their existence in the Bible. Even the United States, by any measure the most successful of them all, is missing from the prophetic record. You can’t tell me God didn’t know these empires were coming, so their absence has to mean that He sees them as irrelevant to Israel’s destiny. Don’t get me wrong, He has used them all to advance His plan for His people, and they were all blessed through their time of participation. But He didn’t find any of them worthy of mention because He didn’t actually need any of them to fulfil His plan.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 555: Before I left, I tried to fight my nervosity in many ways. I read everything I could get my hands on that seemed relevant to my chosen academic field — a mix of business and engineering. I prepared my courses in advance. I sought reassurance from others that I’d chosen a good school and degree.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 539: Someone very insecure about who they are that they must at all times appear to be 'edgy' with shock value in order to stay relevant. This often means someone who thinks excessive violence and guns are cool, plays way too much GTA and goes out of their way to be an annoying hipster douchebag, often excusing their pretty disgusting selfish behaviour and toxic conceited attitudes by quoting "Beyond Good and Evil" by Neitzsche. They will also find other Edgelords to create cliques with in order to maintain their comfortable Groupthink dynamics and will malign those who do not share their miserable hipster world view.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 940: runoissa, joissa jokainen osa on täysin relevantti ja
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 500: Für diese Arbeit sind wesentlich die Begriffe Philia und Agape relevant, weshalb diese Arbeit nicht im Detail auf die Eros Liebe eingehen wird. Für neugierige Leser ist es jedoch sinnvoll, Nygrens Gegenüberstellung von Agape und Eros Liebe zu betrachten (vgl. Nygren 160ff.).
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 88: Europe was seen as a royal pain in the arse, a rival for U.S. attentions to neo-capitalist Russia. They should be left to build their own pathetic old world order without Freedom Fries while the U.S. would watch and sneer in the sidelines. The problem was that U.S. presence in Germany was no longer paying off and the Persian Gulf crisis showed how unreliable those fuckers were. Europe was discussing the European Community, the CSCE warming up relations with the Russkies. Gorbachev even proposed an all-European security council, in effect superseding the increasingly irrelevant NATO. Aargh!
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 450: I added the entry for the verb blow (in the relevant sense) from the Eleventh Collegiate Dictionary, including that dictionary's take on the etymology of the term. I'm very surprised that no one before Elena Lysko pointed out the correct meaning of blow in the quotation cited by the OP; the question has been on EL&U for almost three years, and has been seen by more than 2,700 people. In any case, thank you, Elena Lysko, for providing this long overdue clarification. –
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 705: Western writers who, for reasons of the defense of Christianity and Judaism, or for their reasons of their disbelief in any Divine Revelation, have been wont to disparage the Quran as regards to factual, historical accuracy, or have spoken of “Muhammad’s confused knowledge of history” or his “imperfect or deficient knowledge of Judaism” are, in every respect, wide of the mark. To begin with, such observations presume the Prophet’s participation in the compositions of the Quran, which is in no way admissible...Although the stories in the Quran have their historical origins, they undergo a transformation which lifts them out of their former context into a retelling which is not that of a human tongue ...Divine revelation [takes] this “material” and [uses] it for its own purposes; the origins of the story become irrelevant...
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 810: According to van Niekerk, one can argue with the philosopher Immanuel Kant, who “exemplifies a pure retributivism about capital punishment: murderers must die for their offense, social consequences are wholly irrelevant, and the basis for linking the death penalty to the crime is ‘the Law of Retribution,’ the ancient maxim”, the law of retaliation (an eye for an eye), “rooted in ‘the principle of equality’”. (I THOUGHT Kant sucked, and he does!)
xxx/ellauri215.html on line 487: Maybe, but this argument is outdated and completely irrelevant! Jehovan käsky on jo täytetty, maa vilisee jo pikku kärppiä. Mixi Grace valkkasi noin tätimäiset housut esitelmäasuxi? Eikös aiheeseen olis sopineet reikäiset farkut jotka kaivautuvat pillurakoon? Noihan raidalliset lökäpöxyt on yhtä sexikkäät kuin Lealla.
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 341: What was this book even about??? The "narrator" kept jumping around with what he was talking about, quite a few times I had no idea who was speaking, and what was the point of all the billionaires? They had absolutely nothing to do with the story! It took 104 pages of confusing and pointless narrative for the guy to tell the girl (after 40 years of knowing her, no less) that he wanted to be with her. This might have been one of the most anti-climactic love stories I have ever read. The secondary characters seemed completely irrelevant to the plotline and it appeared that their only function was to take up printable space. The story was unimaginative, lacking in depth, and devoid of anything memorable. The only reason I bothered to finish it was to get one step closer to finishing my goodreads reading challenge, else I would have ditched it at page 20.
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 156: Someone asked the Rabbit “Is whataboutism always fallacious?“ Here’s my reply: Bringing up someone else’s hypocrisy across cases is not fallacious in and of itself. It’s fallacious if the hypocrisy is irrelevant to their being alt-right.
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 71: Tässä yhteydessä relevantti merkitys on 2). Löysin vaihtojyrsijöiden hyllystä espanjankielisenä Waynen teoxen Nuevos pensamientos para una vida mejor: la sabiduria del tao ja päätin tutustua samassa hötäkässä sekä Dyeriin että Daoon. Senverran hengellistä fuusiosafkaa oli tarjona että piti tutustua: kiinalaisia ajatuxia kaljusta jenkkipäästä latinojen matukielellä. Espanja on muutenkin ajankohtainen kielenä, pitihän Jöns mulle puheen simplified espanjaxi 70-vuotispäivänä. Tosin se koski enemmän Jeesusta ja Jönsiä kuin päivänsankaria.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 95: Almost all relevant data are produced by the Office for National Statistics and other national statistical agencies.
xxx/ellauri259.html on line 341: uudelleen orjuuden ikeeseen. 2 5:2 Ap. t. 15:11 Minä, Paavali, sanon teille: jos annatte ympärileikata itsenne, teille ei ole Kristuksesta mitään hyötyä. 3 5:3 Room. 2:25,4:4. Tässä relevantti sitaatti:
xxx/ellauri291.html on line 452: Yhdessä ilmeisessä mielessä Putin ja Kreml jakavat natsi-Saksan uskon: jos valhetta toistetaan riittävän usein, se koetaan lopulta totuudeksi tai ainakin jollain tasolla relevantiksi. Hallitustekniikkaa, jota kutsutaan "suureksi valheeksi", käsiteltiin jo teoksessa Mein Kampf (1925). Hitler tajusi, että jättimäinen, karkea valhe – Die große Lüge – toimii paremmin kuin pieni valhe. Järkyttävät valheet – vaikka ne kiistävätkin vuoret tosiasioita – jättävät usein epäilyksen jälkeä. Pikkuhiljaa yhteiskunnallinen luottamus repeytyy ja vetää maton alta jaetun kuvan saamiseksi todellisuudesta. Tätä propagandatekniikkaa kehitti edelleen Joseph Goebbels muun muassa alitajuisesti itsensä paljastavassa näyttelyssä Aus Churchills Lügenfabrik (1941): on välttämätöntä valehdella suurella tavalla ja levittää sitä kunnolla, toistaa ilmeisiä vääriä virheitä huolimatta vaarasta, että vaikutat naurettavalta ja irtaantuneelta todellisuudesta. Riittää, jos tavoitat pienen määrän vastaanottavaisia ​​kuuntelijoita, jotka etsivät syntipukkeja. Rabulistit [vähän niinkuin populistit, mutta pahempaa, niinkuin kakka ja paska] vetoavat yhteiskunnan onnettomiin lapsiin, vähäosaisiin, laahuxeen, antavat syrjäytyneille mahdollisuuden tukahdutettuun revansismiin. Sellainen peli nyt ei kerta kaikkiaan vetele! Pitäkää mölyt mahassa ja jatkakaa vessan pesua! Tässä Trump vie tulisoihtua eteenpäin historiallisessa jatkumossa suurella valheellaan ilmeisestä vaalitappiosta vuonna 2020.
xxx/ellauri319.html on line 251: Tämä kertomus löytyi "Greedy finance" nimiseltä palstalta, se oli täynnä mainoskatkoja. Pääasia oli kazoa ne kaikki mainoxet. Ads help us run this site. By continuing your navigation on our site, pre-selected companies may set cookies or access and use sensitive information on your device to serve relevant ads or personalized content.
xxx/ellauri354.html on line 281: Indeed, as Rinaldi claims, The Black Pig “tells you about those priests” (FTA 8). And it is easy enough to see why the priest thought it “a filthy and vile book.” But Rinaldi’s complaint, that it “shook my faith” (7), needs to be read in the context of everything else we know of this character. If Rinaldi is a real believer—which I doubt—he would disdain Notari’s book, which, although heavily documented, is dripping with scorn, irony, and bias. But if his faith is automatic and largely irrelevant, or if it has already been shaken, he might have read on, attracted by Notari’s wide reading, his witty, strong prose, and his relentlessly rationalist logic, sometimes reminiscent of MarkTwain.
83