Pahempia kuin nää "ylilyönnit" on jenkki"oikeuden" tavalliset käytännöt. Vankilat on nöyryytyslaitoxia, oikeudenkäynnit televisioituja farsseja, pahimmat tapauxet kuskataan Guantanamoon ja kidutetaan siellä, nöyryytetään mumslimeita kostoxi tuplatorneista. Ne nyt jouti mennäkin, rahavallan törkeet tuplafäkkisormet. Sit oli se Abu Ghraib "skandaali", missä apinan lailla irvistelevät jenkkisotilaat näytti peukku ylös merkkiä alastoman mumslimiruumiskasan päällä. Kaikenlaista ihan samanlaista sikailua kuin karja-aidan toisellakin puolella. Ei helvetti, ne on nää apinat ize, ei mikään paha meemi, joka näitä teettää. Just samanlaista meinikiä on jenkkivankiloissa, sanoo lähde. The human animal is capable of behaviors unimagined by our rational actor models, and even by our most resolutely "behavioral" brands of law and economics.
ellauri048.html on line 88: Hyvänä kakkosena sitten sexuaalissävytteinen rakkaus, jota rationalistit oli

ellauri050.html on line 745: Vaakku kuittaa: näissä säkeissä on naisellista, täysin epärationalistista "filosofiaa" pelotuslainausmerkeissä, joka lisää Saiman omalaatuista lyyrillistä suloa. Näihin kuviin, näihin tunnelmiin, setämieheltä, over and out.
ellauri052.html on line 613: Ruusuristiläisyys on mystiikkaan perustuva liike, jonka väitetään saaneen alkunsa Christian Rosenkreutzin 1420-luvulla kokoamasta veljeskunnasta. Yleisesti tunnetuksi järjestö tuli Euroopassa 1600-luvulla, ja se oli uuden ajan alun tärkeimpiä okkultistisia virtauksia. 1700-luvulla, rationalismin aikana, ruusuristiläisyyden suosio hiipui. 1800-luvulta alkaen ruusuristiläisiksi itseään sanoneita järjestöjä alkoi syntyä Yhdysvalloissa ja Euroopassa osana okkultismin suosion kasvua.
ellauri053.html on line 535: The Language of Criticism was originally Casey's doctoral thesis. Casey argued that critical judgement is objective because critical arguments are rational. They are rational due to considerations which, though they are not necessarily judgements of value, "criteriologically" imply them. For example, if a poem is sentimental "criteriologically" this implies that it is immature.
ellauri053.html on line 537: Christopher Ricks wrote of this book, "provided this gets clearing from the philosophers, we shall at last have a compact, cogent and humane justification of criticism as a rational process." Paskanmarjat Casey oli niin konservatiivi katoliikki eze diggas jopa islamia. Ja lysytti muuteskin naisia.
ellauri055.html on line 1143: Né à Gand, Maurice Maeterlinck est l'aîné d'une famille de trois enfants, flamande, bourgeoise, catholique, conservatrice et francophone. Après des études au collège Sainte-Barbe (Sint-Barbara) de Gand, il suit des études en droit avant de pratiquer le métier d'avocat durant une courte période. Maeterlinck publie, dès 1885, des poèmes d’inspiration parnassienne dans La Jeune Belgique. Il part pour Paris où il rencontre plusieurs écrivains qui vont l'influencer, dont Stéphane Mallarmé et Villiers de l’Isle-Adam. Ce dernier lui fait découvrir les richesses de l'idéalisme allemand (Hegel, Schopenhauer). À la même époque, Maeterlinck découvre Ruysbroeck l'Admirable, un mystique flamand du XIVe siècle dont il traduit les écrits (Ornement des noces spirituelles). C'est ainsi qu'il se tourne vers les richesses intuitives du monde germanique en s'éloignant du rationalisme français. Dans cet esprit, il se consacre à Novalis et entre en contact avec le romantisme d'Iéna (Allemagne, 1787-1831, autour d'August et Friedrich Schlegel et de la revue l'Athenäum), précurseur en droite ligne du symbolisme. Les œuvres que publie Maeterlinck entre 1889 et 1896 sont imprégnées de cette influence germanique.
ellauri060.html on line 1046: This content quality problem has been exacerbated by Google’s switch to emphasize the freshness of their index years ago. The rationale was that there was so much good stuff around, and that its supply was (supposedly even exponentially) constantly increasing so Google would always be able to show amazing results just from the freshest portion of their index.
ellauri071.html on line 554: Netzach is the sephirah 'victory', the ability of raw, emotional, passionate energy to overcome obstacles, but it needs to be balanced by Hod, the ability to rationalize and exercise a degree of self-control. If it is not balanced it becomes uncontrolled passion, desire, greed and covetousness, the dark side of Venus, which is unbridled lust. Never underestimate it, anyway.
ellauri072.html on line 477: What will happen when the age-old economy of scarcity gives way to the Age of Leisure? Professor Gabor, who won the 1971 Nobel Prize for physics offers a futuristic projection based on a static population and GNP, "classless, democratic, and uniformly rich." Fearful that total secruity "will create unbearable boredom and bring out the worst in Irrational Man," Gabor is anxious to retain "effort," "hardship," and the Protestant Ethic -- lest society dissolve in an orgy of anti-social, hedonistic nihilism (viz. the current drug explosion and the spoiled-brat students). To avoid such evils Gabor proposes that work and its attendant moral uplift be divorced from production and the service sector of the economy be vastly enlarged. But this is only the beginning -- enthusiastic about Social Engineering Gabor suggests using it to weed out potential misfits, trouble-makers and "power addicts"; supplementing I.Q. tests with E.Q. (Ethical Quotient) measurements; and modeling elementary and secondary education on the 19th century British public school which knew so well how to inculcate good citizenship, intellectual excellence and pride in achievement. The Third World, still wrestling with pre-industrial material want, is ignored -- since we can't afford any more industrial pollution presumably they will just have to adjust to their misery. Gabor's assessment of "the Nature of Man" shows a woefully naive Anglo-American ethnocentricity and complete ignorance of anthropology and his vision of post-industrial utopia operating on the moral axioms of the 19th century is as elitist as it is improbable.
ellauri074.html on line 220: A motivational speaker or inspirational speaker is a speaker who makes speeches intended to motivate or inspire an audience. Such speakers may attempt to challenge or transform their audiences. The speech itself is popularly known as a pep talk. Motivational speakers can deliver speeches at schools, colleges, places of worship, companies, corporations, government agencies, conferences, trade shows, summits, community organizations, and similar environments. Their main motivation is money. Faith, fear, and credit. They're all made up. External links:
ellauri077.html on line 56: ¹Christopher Bartlett^* (2016) “An Exercise in Telemachry”: David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest and Intergenerational Conversation. in Critique: Studies in ContemporaryFiction, 57:4, 374-389, DOI: 10.1080/00111619.2015.1113921
ellauri077.html on line 358: Unomuna oli synnynnäinen baskiainen jonka lempinimi oli Pölö. Hän oli tuuliajolla: tiede ja rationalistinen filosofia ei vastannut sen syömmin kysymyxiin ja kirkon dogmaattinen rakenne oli epätyydyttävä ja pinnallinen sille. Järki ja usko olivat sotajalalla Unomunan rinnan alla. Yxi kirjoittaja sanoi osuvasti: "This is pure baloney."
ellauri080.html on line 484: Thinking in, feelings out versus feelings in, thinking out. These two attitudes can be summed up as ‘translating’ and ‘operationalizing’ respectively. Hauskasti myös filosofit ja muut julkkixet on numeroitavissa kuin kananpojat Jungin axeleilla:
ellauri089.html on line 108: “[T]here seems to have been an actual decline in rational thinking. The United States had become a place where entertainers and professional athletes were mistaken for people of importance. They were idolized and treated as leaders; their opinions were sought on everything and they took themselves just as seriously—after all, if an entertainer is paid a million or more a year, he knows he is important ... so his opinions of foreign affairs and domestic policies must be important, too, even though he proves himself to be ignorant and subliterate every time he opens his mouth.”
ellauri089.html on line 212: History does not record anywhere at any time a religion that has any rational basis. Religion is a crutch for people not strong enough to stand up to the unknown without help. But like dandruff, most people do have a religion and spend money on it and seem to derive considerable pleasure from fiddling with it.
ellauri089.html on line 529: § 61. and it is shewn that, in consequence of this confusion, his representation of "the relation of Rational Egoism to Rational Benevolence" as "the profoundest problem of Ethics", and his view that a certain hypothesis is required to "make Ethics rational", are grossly erroneous. …
ellauri096.html on line 126: In 1961 Henry Kyburg pointed out that this policy conflicted with a principle of agglomeration: If you rationally believe p
ellauri096.html on line 127: and rationally believe q then you rationally believe both p and q. Little pictures of the same scene should sum to a bigger picture of the same scene. If rational belief can be based on an acceptance rule that only requires a high probability, there will be rational belief in a contradiction! You believe of each ticket it loses, and you believe that one of them wins.
ellauri096.html on line 138: Very elegant! But if joint inconsistency is rationally tolerable, why do these philosophers bother to offer solutions? Why is it not rational to believe each of (1)–(4), despite their joint inconsistency?
ellauri096.html on line 144: The resemblance between the preface paradox and the surprise test paradox becomes more visible through an intermediate case. The preface of Siddhartha Mukherjee’s The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer warns: “In cases where there was no prior public knowledge, or when interviewees requested privacy, I have used a false name, and deliberately confounded identities to make it difficult to track.” Those who refuse consent to be lied to are free to close Doctor Mukherjee’s chronicle. But nearly all readers think the physician’s trade-off between lies and new information is acceptable. They rationally anticipate being rationally misled. Nevertheless, these readers learn much about the history of cancer. Similarly, students who are warned that they will receive a surprise test rationally expect to be rationally misled about the day of the test. The prospect of being misled does not lead them to drop the course.
ellauri096.html on line 163: Epistemic paradoxes affect decision theory because rational choices are based on beliefs and desires. If the agent cannot form a rational belief, it is difficult to interpret his behavior as a choice. The purpose of attributing beliefs and desires is to set up practical syllogisms that make sense of actions as means to ends. Subtracting rationality from the agent makes framework useless. Given this commitment to charitable interpretation, there is no possibility of your rationally choosing an option that you believe to be inferior. So if you choose, you cannot really believe you were operating as an anti-expert, that is, someone whose opinions on a topic are reliably wrong (Egan and Elga 2005).
ellauri096.html on line 271: If the students know that they will not forget and know there will be no undermining by outside evidence, then we may be inclined to agree with Binkley’s summary that his idealized student never loses the knowledge he accumulates. As we shall see, however, this overlooks other ways in which rational agents may lose knowledge.
ellauri096.html on line 287: Since the surprise test paradox can also be formulated in terms of rational belief, there will be parallel adjustments for what we ought to believe. We are criticized for failures to believe the logical consequences of what we believe and criticized for believing propositions that conflict with each other. Anyone who meets these ideals of completeness and consistency will be unable to believe a range of consistent propositions that are accessible to other complete and consistent thinkers. In particular, they will not be able to believe propositions attributing specific errors to them, and propositions that entail these off-limit propositions.
ellauri096.html on line 289: Some people wear T-shirts with Question Authority! written on them. Questioning authority is generally regarded as a matter of individual discretion. The surprise test paradox shows that it is sometimes mandatory. The student is rationally required to doubt the teacher’s announcement even though the teacher has not given any evidence of being unreliable. Indeed, the student can foresee that their change of mind opens a new opportunity for surprise.
ellauri096.html on line 295: Socrates could regain consistency by downgrading his meta-knowledge to the status of a belief. If he believes he knows nothing, then he naturally wishes to remedy his ignorance by asking about everything. This rationale is accepted throughout the early dialogues. But when we reach the Meno, one of his interlocutors has an epiphany. After Meno receives the standard treatment from Socrates about the nature of virtue, Meno discerns a conflict between Socratic ignorance and Socratic inquiry (Meno 80d, in Cooper 1997). How would Socrates recognize the correct answer even if Meno gave it?
ellauri096.html on line 438: Pogonophobia is the irrational, persistent and often unwarranted fear of beards. The word is derived from Greek pogon (beard) and phobos (fear). Mothers often warn their daughters to "never trust a man with beard or facial hair unless he is Santa Claus". In the United States, there has not been a president with a beard since the 1800s.
ellauri096.html on line 679: In the 1980s, macro models emerged that attempted to directly respond to Lucas through the use of rational expectations econometrics.
ellauri096.html on line 806: In Piaget´s theory of cognitive development, the third stage is called the Concrete Operational Stage. During this stage, which occurs from age 7-12, the child shows increased use of logic or reasoning. One of the important processes that develops is that of Seriation, which refers to the ability to sort objects or situations according to any characteristic, such as size, color, shape, or type. For example, the child would be able to look at his plate of mixed vegetables and eat everything except the brussels sprouts.
ellauri097.html on line 132: Frank Kermode´s The Sense of an Ending (1967) was an early mention of Vaihinger as a useful methodologist of narrativity. He says that "literary fictions belong to Vaihinger’s category of 'the consciously false.' They are not subject, like hypotheses, to proof or disconfirmation, only, if they come to lose their operational effectiveness, to neglect."
ellauri097.html on line 420: Kant held that all rational persons have an a priori understanding of the basic principles of morality. These consist of duties, both to oneself and to others, and above all the duty to respect rational agents. Most persons, however, do not understand that morality is a priori, and their moral commitments are therefore vulnerable to corrosive skeptical criticism. In The Metaphysics of Morals Kant formulates the ultimate standard for moral judgment, namely universalizability, and establishes the rational necessity of morality.
ellauri098.html on line 448: It can be an effort for INTPs to remain grounded and relate their thinking to the real world, and others can see them as distant and unemotional. But the pure rationality that an INTP brings is a powerful tool for unlocking problems when it’s applied properly.

ellauri100.html on line 333: The same goes for jejune libertarians, of all ages, whose narrow rationalism often materializes in rank offensiveness and a tendency toward naive absolutism. (See this and this, for example. And take this, and this!)
ellauri101.html on line 556: The Lost Generation was the social generational cohort that came of age during World War I. "Lost" in this context refers to the "disoriented, wandering, directionless" spirit of many of the war's survivors in the early postwar period. The term is also particularly used to refer to a group of American expatriate writers living in Paris during the 1920s. Gertrude Stein is credited with coining the term, and it was subsequently popularized by Ernest Hemingway who used it in the epigraph for his 1926 novel The Sun Also Rises: "You are all a lost generation".
ellauri106.html on line 457: Roth: "I have no desire to be irrational."

ellauri106.html on line 508: Modernization moved from “the sacred to the profane side of historical time”: Rather than a free market or contractual society, modern America became ‘capitalist,’ no longer rational, interdependent, modern, and liberating, but backward, greedy, anarchic, and impoverishing.
ellauri106.html on line 543: ... Her parents (Clairen kai) were simple people in the grips of a pipe dream that they could not begin to articulate or rationally defend but for which they were zealously willing to sacrifice friends, relatives, business, the good will of neighbors, even their own sanity, even their children’s sanity....
ellauri107.html on line 250: Billy is first the victim of Claggart’s closet, one with similarities to the Roy Cohn and J. Edgar Hoover kinds that project self-loathing onto their targets. Vere’s condition, on the other hand, while containing degrees of benevolence, ultimately emerges as more deadly than Claggart’s. Associating his heart with his hated feminine side, Vere crushes down his capacity for love and compassion with a thoroughly brutal, Night-of-the-Long-Knives sort of intolerance. He, who would never have initiated Billy’s demise, will not permit his own ardor to soften his inflexible judgment, as that would evidently equate with irresolution and weakness. After all, he might rationalize, he is the Captain and the Captain has an image to uphold – right? Forget justice; forget humane treatment; maintaining machismo holds precedence over all! And the tragic result: mindless, meaningless, totally unnecessary suffering and loss on the altar of nothing less than evil itself!
ellauri110.html on line 126: The Houyhnhnms are rational equine beings and are masters of the land, contrasting strongly with the Yahoos, savage humanoid creatures who are no better than beasts of burden, or livestock. Whereas the Yahoos represent all that is bad about humans, Houyhnhnms have a settled, calm, reliable and rational society. Gulliver much prefers the Houyhnhnms' company to the Yahoos', even though the latter are biologically closer to him.
ellauri110.html on line 147: On the other hand, Swift was profoundly mistrustful of attempts at reason that resulted in either hubris (for example, the Projectors satirised in A Tale of a Tub or in Book III of Gulliver's Travels) or immorality (such as the speaker of A Modest Proposal, who offers an entirely logical and wholly immoral proposal for cannibalism). The Houyhnhnms embody both the good and the bad side of reason, for they have the pure language Swift wished for and the amorally rational approach to solving the problems of humanity (Yahoos); the extirpation of the Yahoo population by the horses is very like the speaker of A Modest Proposal.
ellauri110.html on line 152: In the shipping lanes he is rescued by a Portuguese sea captain, a level-headed individual albeit full of concern for others, whose temperament at one level appears intermediate between the calm, rational Houyhnhnms of Houyhnhnmland and the norm of corrupt, European humanity, which Gulliver no longer distinguishes from Houyhnhnmland's wild Yahoos. Gulliver can speak with him, and though now disaffected from all humanity, he began to tolerate his company. Gulliver is returned to his home and family, finds their smell and look intolerable and all his countrymen no better than "Yahoos", purchases and converses with two stabled horses, tolerates the stable boy, and assures the reader of his account's utter veracity.
ellauri115.html on line 568: Henry: Women are irrational, that's all there is to that!
ellauri119.html on line 448: BTW did Mary come? How many times? There are many different theories that attempt to explain what love is, and what function it serves. It would be very difficult to explain love to a hypothetical person who had not himself or herself experienced love or being loved. In fact, to such a person love would appear to be quite strange if not outright irrational behavior.
ellauri119.html on line 454: Why set aside good old Empedocles anyway? He meant forces of attraction and repulsion, he got it just right 2My before Newton. Plato sucks, set him aside instead. The idea of two loves, one heavenly, one earthly is just bullshit. As Tristram Shandy's Uncle Tboy was informed over 2My later, "of these loves, according to Ficinus's comment on Valesius, the one is rational - the other is natural - the first...excites to the desire of philosophy and truth - the second, excites to desire, simply". Toby felt the former toward women and the latter for model trains. Plato's sublimation theory of love involved "mounting upwards...from one to two, and from two to all fair boys, and from fair boys to fair actions, and from fair actions to fair motions, until with fair motions he comes into the bottom of an absolute beauty". Sounds like Plato's own love history from horny gym boy to a dirty old geezer.
ellauri119.html on line 644: There is a very good side to Christianity and a very bad side to Christianity. Rosenbaum strengthened the bad side: zionism, the irrational hatred of Arabs and the sense of choseness of the “elect” in Protestantism; while concurrently weakening the good side of Christianity: social conscience, opposition to usury, communal responsibility, duty, group honor, charity, selflessness, etc.
ellauri119.html on line 700: Rand is a economic libertarian who thought selfishness is a virtue. Rational people simply reject Rand’s economic libertarianism because rational people understand that laissez-faire capitalism results in the concentration of wealth in the hands of those who are good at being selfish.
ellauri119.html on line 738: Rand certainly agreed with Adam Smith who said that when humans act out of rational self-interest, the invisible hand of the market produces the best outcomes.
ellauri119.html on line 744: This is nonsense. Alan Greenspan testified before Congress after the economic meltdown in 2008. He was asked why the invisible hand of the market did not prevent the irrational greed on Wall Street that caused the housing bubble. Greenspan said that there must be a flaw in the the theory (the invisible hand of the market produces the best outcomes). There is also a flaw in Rand’s philosophy.
ellauri119.html on line 775: Asked what she thought of Reagan, Ayn Rand replied, “I don’t think of him. And the more I see, the less I think of him.” For Rand, “the appalling part of his administration was his connection with the so-called ‘Moral Majority’ and sundry other TV religionists, who are struggling, apparently with his approval, to take us back to the Middle Ages via the unconstitutional union of religion and politics.” Rand’s primary concern, it seems, is that this “unconstitutional union” represented a “threat to capitalism.” While she admired Reagan’s appeal to an “inspirational element” in American politics, “he will not find it,” remarked Rand, “in the God, family, tradition swamp.” Instead, she proclaims, we should be inspired by “the most typical American group… the businessmen.”
ellauri131.html on line 361: Motivational speakers Jack Canafield and Mark Victor Hansen collaborated on the first Chicken Coop for the Soul book, compiling inspirational and true stories they had heard from their audience members. Many of the stories came from members of the audience of their inspirational talks. The book was rejected by major publishers in New York but accepted by a small, self-help publisher in Florida called HCI.
ellauri131.html on line 366: the Coople's Soul, Jack Canafield, the Country Soul, the Country Soul Music, the College Soul, Jack Canafield, the Canadian Soul, the Chiropractic Soul, the Christian Family Soul, Jack Canafield, and Nancy Autio (2000), Chicken Coop for the Christian Teenage Soul, Jack Canafield, Mark Victor Hansen, Kimberly Kirberger, Patty Aubery and Nancy Mitchell-Autio, the Christian Sole, the Christian Sole 2, the Christian Woman's Hole, Christmas Sole, Christmas in Canada, Christmas Magic, Christmas Treasury, Christmas Treasury for Kids, Healthy Living Series: Weight Loss, where Jack combines inspirational stories with medical advice. The Cat-and-Dog Lovers, Count Your Blessings, Create Your Second Best Future, The Mating Game, the Dental Bowl, The Rental Hole, Dieter's Soul, Divorce and Recovery Soul, where Jack combines inspirational stories with legal advice. The Dog Did What? Same as The Cat? The Dog Lovers' Dreams and Premonitions, Chicken Coop for the Entrepreneur's Black Soul, Jack Canafield, for the Empty Hesters, for Every Mom's Horny Son, for the Expectant Mother, Family Matters, Father's Cock, Father and Daughter videos, Father and Son's Holey Camp, Find Your Happiness, Find Your Inner Strength, Find your Arse with both hands, Finding My Faith, Fisherman's Friend, Jack Canafield,
ellauri131.html on line 938: Covey, more than most inspirational writers, is able to skate right up close to the border of the divine without alarming anyone. Dr. Stephen R. Covey, author of The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, has lost his laser pointer once again and is practically jumping up off the stage to point to a giant chart projected on the wall of a conference room at the Westin Hotel in Seattle. He would be an imposing man if he were two inches taller.
ellauri131.html on line 960: And what of the true cynic's view, that the lesson of history is that bastards often prevail? That markets are in and of themselves rational, and sometimes emotional, but rarely ever moral? That an appropriate model for business is not an extended family but a poker game? The late genius John von Neumann was fascinated by poker, and his study of the choice making involved in the game led him to develop the foundations of game theory. Von Neumann was a peerless student of the principles of rational self-interest, and he was also an adviser to Presidents Truman and Eisenhower. When the Soviets showed signs of developing nuclear weapons, he recommended bombing them into oblivion. Game theory, he said, dictated it.
ellauri132.html on line 111: (PST: Kuka on Sam Harris?) Samuel Benjamin Harris was born in Los Angeles, California, on April 9, 1967. He is an American author, philosopher, neuroscientist, and podcast host. His work touches on a wide range of topics, including rationality, religion, ethics, free will, neuroscience, meditation, psychedelics, philosophy of mind, politics, terrorism, and artificial intelligence. — Sam Harris rejects the dichotomy between spirituality and rationality , favoring a middle path that preserves spirituality and science but does not involve religion.
ellauri133.html on line 364: Stephen King’s novel It, first published in 1986, is known for its whopping page count and multigenerational horror saga. In 2017, buzz around It spiked again due to director Andy Muschietti´s big-screen adaptation of the novel. The film, which went on to become the highest-grossing horror movie ever, was the novel’s second trip to the screen, following a 1990 television miniseries. And now Muschietti is continuing the story with the highly anticipated IT Chapter 2, which arrives in theaters today.
ellauri141.html on line 113: In B. C. 17, Augustus celebrated the Ludi Seculares, and Horace was required to write an Ode for the occasion, which he did, and it has been preserved. This circumstance, and the credit it brought him, may have given his mind another leaning to Ode-writing, and have helped him to produce the fourth book, a few pieces in which may have been written at any time. It is said that Augustus particularly desired Horace to publish another book of Odes, in order that those he wrote upon the victories of Drusus and Tiberius (4 and 14) might appear in it. The latter of these Odes was not written, probably, till B. C. 13, when Augustus returned from Gaul. If so, the book was probably published in that year, when Horace was fifty-two. The Odes of the fourth book show no diminution of power, but the reverse. There are none in the first three books that surpass, or perhaps equal, the Ode in honor of Drusus, and few superior to that which is addressed to Lollius. The success of the first three books, and the honor of being chosen to compose the Ode at the Ludi Seculares, seem to have given him encouragement. There are no incidents in his life during the above period recorded or alluded to in his poems. He lived five years after the publication of the fourth book of Odes, if the above date be correct, and during that time, I think it probable, he wrote the Epistles to Augustus and Florus which form the second book; and having conceived the intention of writing a poem on the art and progress of poetry, he wrote as much of it as appears in the Epistle to the Pisones which has been preserved among his works. It seems, from the Epistle to Florus, that Horace at this time had to resist the urgency of friends begging him to write, one in this style and another in that, and that he had no desire to gratify them and to sacrifice his own ease to a pursuit in which it is plain he never took any great delight. He was likely to bring to it less energy as his life was drawing prematurely to a close, through infirmities either contracted or aggravated during his irrational campaigning with Brutus, his inaptitude for which he appears afterwards to have been perfectly aware of. He continued to apply himself to the study of moral philosophy till his death, which took place, according to Eusebius, on the 27th of November, B. C. 8, in the fifty-seventh year of his age, and within a few days of its completion. Mæcenas died the same year, also towards the close of it; a coincidence that has led some to the notion, that Horace hastened his own death that he might not have the pain of surviving his patron. According to Suetonius, his death (which he places after his fifty-ninth year) was so sudden, that he had not time to execute his will, which is opposed to the notion of suicide. The two friends were buried near one another “in extremis Esquiliis,” in the farthest part of the Esquiliæ, that is, probably, without the city walls, on the ground drained and laid out in gardens by Mæcenas.
ellauri142.html on line 55: Markku's life changes after he becomes the sole heir to his father's vast estate, and his position in society is changed from that of an illegitimate son to the new Count Bezukhov. His inability to control his emotions and sexual passions lead him into a marriage with the vapid but sexually beautiful Princess Kristina, a match which her self-serving father, Prince Carl Erik, sets up to secure his access to Markku's newly acquired vast fortune. Kristina is not in love with Markku, and has affairs. From jealousy, Markku shoots his suspected lover, Dolokhov, in a duel. He is distraught at having committed such a crime and eventually separates from Kristina and then becomes a Freemason. His madhat escape into the city of Moscow and his subsequent obsessive belief that he is destined to be Napoleon’s mistress show his submission to irrational impulses. Yet his search for meaning in his life and for how to overcome his emotions are a central theme of the novel. He eventually finds love and marriage with Pirkko Hiekkala, becomes a ladies shoes salesman called Al Bundy and their marriage is perhaps the culmination of a life of moral and spiritual questioning. They have four children: three boys and one girl. Correction, one extremely good-looking platinum blonde girl and one about equally gifted son.
ellauri142.html on line 797: Tätä näkökantaansa seuraten ovat nuo tietämättömät, joiden ymmärrys (buddhi, yleisvalaistus) on vähäinen ja toiminta välinpitämätön, ihmiskunnan vihollisia ja pahennusten synnyttäjiä maailmassa. Siihen kuuluvat niin hyvin sellaiset ”filosofit”, (materialismi ja rationalismi), jotka koettavat vastustaa ja kieltää tällästä korkeampaa henkistä tuntemusta, kuin myös paavilaisuus, jonka uskonto perustuu itserakkaudelle ja pelolle; sen tähden sille on paavin oma ja kirkon etu elämän korkein päämaali (Hahaa, touché, vastapaavit).
ellauri142.html on line 803: Sellainen filosofinen järjestelmä, jonka mukaan järjellinen tietäminen poikkeaa aistillisesta. Jumaluustieteessä merkitsee rationalismi peruslausetta, joka
ellauri142.html on line 806: Tällästä rationalistit antautuvat pohjattomiin himoihin; he ovat täynnä kavaluutta ja ajattelemattomuutta. Näennäisyyden sokaisemina he riippuvat lujasti kiinni harhassaan; elämäntapansa he ovat järjestäneet saastaisuuden mukaisesti. He antautuvat mahdottomiin haaveiluihin, jotka johtavat tyhjyyteen. Heidän korkein ihanteensa on himojensa tyydyttäminen, ja he uskovat, että he siten saavuttavat elämänsä päämaalin, joka ei ole muuta kuin himojen tyydyttäminen. (Nojoo.)
ellauri142.html on line 1020: Alphonse Louis Constant, (8. helmikuuta 1810 – 31. toukokuuta 1875) oli ranskalainen okkultisti ja maagikko. Nimi ”Eliphas Lévi”, jolla hän kirjoitti kirjansa, oli hänen yrityksensä kääntää etunimensä Alphonse ja Louis hepreankielisiksi. Lévi oli pariisilaisen suutarin poika. Hän kävi pappisseminaareissa ja alkoi opiskella katolisen papin virkaa varten. Samaan aikaan hän kuitenkin rakastui ja lopetti opintonsa ilman pappisvihkimystä. Hän kirjoitti lukuisia lyhyitä uskonnollisia teoksia: Des Moeurs et des Doctrines du Rationalisme en France ('rationalismin moraalisista tavoista ja opeista Ranskassa', 1839) oli vastavalistuksen kulttuurillinen lentolehtinen. La Mère de Dieu ('Jumalan äiti', 1844) johti kahteen lyhyeen vankilatuomioon. Se seurasi kahta radikaalia lentolehtistä L'Evangile du Peuple ('Ihmisten evankeliumi', 1840), ja Le Testament de la Liberté ('Vapauden testamentti'), jotka julkaistiin vallankumouksen vuonna 1848. Lévi oli lyhyen aikaa naimisissa kirjailija Claude Vignonin kanssa. Alphonse oli kalju partapozo.
ellauri142.html on line 1039: Aikuisen voiman lehdessä 11/21 oli uutta tietoa paskan elämän oireyhtymästä. Sen tärkein tekijä on laissez-faire kapitalismin keskeinen credo, toi "maaginen vapaaehtoisuus" (Magical voluntarism). Termin lanseeraaja David Small oli hyvä joskin pieni mies. Taavi-eno kuoli 76-vuotiaana 2014. Vaikka britti olikin, se oli aivan oikeilla jäljillä. Amerikkalaisten ylläpitämä Wikipedia tuomizee (tai vähintäinkin leimaa) sen näkemyxet nimellä "a social materialist explanation of psychological distress". Tää "maaginen vapaaehtoisuus" on toi seppoilu, eli existentialistinen uskomus että jokaisella yxilöllä on voima luoda izestään mitä haluaa. No sehän on aivan ilmiselvää potaskaa. Sitä hanakammin sitä tarjotaan kaikessa jenkkiviihteessä, kz. esim. Emily in Paris. Fisherin mukaan "masennus on esimerkki siitä mitä tapahtuu, kun maaginen vapaaehtoisuus tulee mahdollisen rajalle." Sillä rajalla kävi Eskikin, kun sen tieteellinen uskottavuus upposi, mutta aika äkkiä se osas rationalisoida asian ja asemoida izensä uudestaan nyt "käytännön filosofixi", lue motivaatiopuhujaxi. Pastorixihan se oli pienenä aikonutkin. Haaveet toteutuivat! Höpsismi toimii sittenkin!
ellauri146.html on line 400: One of the outstanding features of the Romantic era in France was the re-evaluation of the feminine. It was widely assumed that man's capacity for rational thought and scientific achievement needed to be tempered by woman's capacity for sentiment. Indeed, the beneficial influence of woman's love and compassion was considered a necessary precondition to moral development, both for the individual and for all mankind. Woman thus had redemptive qualities (cash value). Perhaps the purest expression of this constellation of ideas is to be found in the utopian religious sects of the period and in the Romantic epic. Alfred de Vigny's Eloa (1824) may be read in this context. Eloa is the first of a series of angel women appearing in the Romantic epic. She is followed by Rachel in Edgar Quinet's Ahasvérus (1833), Sémida in Alexandre Soumet's La Divine Epopée (1840), Marie in Alphonse Constant's La Mère de Dieu (1844) and Liberté in Victor Hugo's La Fin de Satan (fragments written in 1854 and 1859, published posthumously in 1886). The mission of these quasi-divine female figures is to help put an end to evil.
ellauri147.html on line 806: Diesem Profil fügt er eine dynamische Dimension hinzu, auf der er sichtbare von verdeckten/larvierten Merkmalen unterscheidet. Die so beschriebenen Profilkategorien wirken aber am Ende so überladen, beliebig und disparat, dass es schwerfällt, damit eine präzise differentialdiagnostische Abgrenzung der narzisstischen Persönlichkeitsstörung mit Hilfe ihrer klinischen Merkmale zu leisten. So führt Akhtar etwa unter der Kategorie ‘Interpersonale Beziehungen/verdeckt’ das skurrile Merkmal ein: „Tendenz, Briefe nicht zu beantworten“ oder unter derselben Kategorie/sichtbar die schwer operationalisierbare : „Unfähigkeit, wirklich authentisch (Hervorhebung von mir, M.A.) an Gruppenaktivitäten teilzunehmen“.
ellauri150.html on line 752: I've watched a variety of shows on EWTN on the lives of saints. Even though the production quality cannot approach that of Hollywood, I find the stories so intriguing that I prefer to watch them to the regular TV programs on other channels. In the 1960s the stories of the saints were rejected as being to full of supernatural elements. Now with the New Age movement, people complain that Christianity does not have enough of a spiritual content. Well that's because the rationalists attempted to strip all the spirituality from Christianity. The lives of the saints are full of spirituality and can demonstrate to contemporary Man that there is no need to turn to exotic religions for spirituality. Everything that they are looking for is right here in the Catholic Church.
ellauri151.html on line 538: Hamannian antitheodicies hold that the dualisms and the rationalisms underlying theodicy debate are speculative metaphysics that can be overcome through philosophical grammar. Eli tässähän on vaan kieli lomalla, annahan kun jäsennän. Tuliko Wittgensteinistäkin hamanniitti loppupeleissä? Lare ainakin on sellainen.
ellauri151.html on line 692: Language has its worth and norms through language-use, which intertwines language and reality and makes reality, mental states and rational concepts a part of the language-games.
ellauri153.html on line 415: offered no rational justification for the manner in which the forces of evil are defeated in the cross
ellauri158.html on line 875: -- P. 3. prop. 57. schol. De affectibus animalium, quae irrationalia dicuntur. [in: P. 4. prop. 37. schol. 1.]
ellauri159.html on line 1007: Fs prefer to use their rational feeling function when making decisions. They place more emphasis on the effect that actions have on people than they do on adhering to the impersonal rule of logic. They tend to give other people the benefit of the doubt.
ellauri159.html on line 1395: Rationality means fluent thinking, 63. Simplification, 65. Clearness, 66. Their antagonism, 66. Inadequacy of the abstract, 68. The thought of nonentity, 71. Mysticism, 74. Pure theory cannot banish wonder, 75. The passage to practice may restore the feeling of rationality, 75. Familiarity and expectancy, 76. 'Substance,' 80. A rational world must appear {xvi} congruous with our powers, 82. But these differ from man to man, 88. Faith is one of them, 90. Inseparable from doubt, 95. May verify itself, 96. Its rôle in ethics, 98. Optimism and pessimism, 101. Is this a moral universe?—what does the problem mean? 103. Anaesthesia versus energy, 107. Active assumption necessary, 107. Conclusion, 110.
ellauri159.html on line 1403: Philosophies seek a rational world, 146. Determinism and Indeterminism defined, 149. Both are postulates of rationality, 152. Objections to chance considered, 153. Determinism involves pessimism, 159. Escape via Subjectivism, 164. Subjectivism leads to corruption, 170. A world with chance in it is morally the less irrational alternative, 176. Chance not incompatible with an ultimate Providence, 180.
ellauri161.html on line 927: Il oppose au rationalisme du XVIIIe siècle le sens commun, la foi, les lois non-écrites. Pour Joseph de Maistre, l'individu est une réalité seconde par rapport à la société et l'autorité. La société ne peut fondamentalement pas se définir comme la somme des individus qui la composent. En cela, il critique la conception de Jean-Jacques Rousseau : il est pour Joseph de Maistre impensable de constituer une société à partir d'un contrat social. Les individus ne peuvent pas fonder les sociétés, ils en sont incapables de par leur nature. Le pouvoir forme les individus, mais les individus ne forment pas le pouvoir.
ellauri162.html on line 787: Apollinarism or Apollinarianism is a Christological heresy proposed by Apollinaris of Laodicea (died 390) that argues that Jesus had a human body and sensitive human soul, but a divine mind and not a human rational mind, the Divine Logos taking the place of the latter. It was deemed heretical in 381 and virtually died out within the following decades. But now it's back! I'll be back said Apollinaris at the end of Season I.
ellauri162.html on line 826: Scienceblogs appears to have a problem keeping and attracting talented writers. According to PZ Myers, Scienceblogs has "been facing a steady erosion of talent". In 2010, the Christian apologetic website True Free Thinker wrote a quite pointed and accurate criticism of PZ Myers Pharyngula blog indicating that PZ Myers' blog posts often lack substance. Pharyngula is widely acclaimed in the liberal media due to its embrace of evolutionary pseudoscience which liberals irrationally embrace (see: Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality). Myers' blog is also listed by the science journal Nature, which also embraces evolutionary pseudoscience, as the best blog by a scientist. Pharyngula is known for its sarcastic and often specious criticism of creation science and intelligent design theory, as well as regular postings of photos of cephalopods (often with vulgarly sexual connotations both subtle and blatant). As Singer said, sexual organs are the best indicators of the soul.
ellauri164.html on line 43: In the introduction to his Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie in 1874, Wundt described Immanuel Cunt and Johann Friedrich Herbart as the philosophers who had the most influence on the formation of his own views. Those who follow up these references will find that Wundt critically took to the cleaners both these thinkers’ ideas. He distanced himself from Herbart's science of the soul . Wundt praised Cunt's rejection of a "rational" psychology deduced from metaphysics, but he argued against Cunt's epistemology as well as Cunt's category theory and his flabby position on teleological explanations in his publication Was soll uns Kant nicht verkaufen? (1892).
ellauri164.html on line 242: Veatch oli suuri rationalismin kannattaja, tomistisen filosofian auktoriteetti ja yksi aikansa johtavista uusaristoteelisista ajattelijoista. Hän vastusti sellaisia moderneja ja nykyaikaisia kehityskulkuja kuin " transsendenttinen käänne " ja " kielinen käänne ". Selkeän puheen ja "Hoosierin" terveen järjen vankkumaton puolustaja filosofiassa ja muualla, hän väitti realistisen metafysiikan ja käytännön etiikan puolesta.
ellauri164.html on line 244: Veatchin luetuin kirja oli Rational Man: A Modern Interpretation of Aristotelian Ethics (1962), joka tarjosi selkeästi rationalistisen vastakohdan William Barrettin tunnetulle eksistentiaalisen filosofian tutkimukselle Irrational Man (1958).
ellauri172.html on line 118: Juoni sijoittuu alkuperäiseen Sombrevalin kylään, jossa kaikki vallankumouksen tuloksena syntyneet voimat kohtaavat: katolilaisuus ateismia vastaan, aristokraatit nousevia vastaan, menneisyys nykypäivää vastaan. Romaani ruokkii suosittuja tarinoita, jotka on lainattu vanhoista normannin legendoista sekoitettuna enemmän tai vähemmän selkeään uskonnolliseen ja raamatulliseen kulttuuriin. Sombrevalin vanhan sairaanhoitajan Malgaignen huolestuttava luonne ilmentää siis arkaaisen ja taikauskoisen Ranskan selviytymistä, joka vastustaa luopiopapin ateistista rationalismia.
ellauri172.html on line 260: Other writers [who?] have opted to deny the validity of the illustration. A typical [citation needed] counter-argument is that rationality as described in the paradox is so limited as to be a straw man version of the real thing. The idea that a random decision could be made is sometimes used as an attempted justification for faith. The argument is that, like the starving ass, we must make a choice to avoid being frozen in endless doubt. Other counter-arguments exist. [This paragraph was total balderdash, if I may say so.]
ellauri180.html on line 644: - Jag har nog alltid sett honom som en kriminell med karaktärsdrag som kännetecknar en diktator. Men han har ändå kalkylerat och bedömt riskerna med sitt agerande med någon form av rationalitet. Tidigare fanns det logik bakom hans beslut.
ellauri183.html on line 162: Kierkegaard predicted that his 1843 work Fear and Trembling would be translated into many different languages, and would secure iz author's place in history. He was right. But Fear and Trembling has also led to an enduring caricature of Kierkegaard as advocating a dangerously irrational and individualistic form of religious faith.
ellauri183.html on line 168: In Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard follows Kant in emphasising that Abraham's decision is morally repugnant and rationally unintelligible. However, he also shows that one consequence of Kant's view is that, if nothing is higher than human reason, then belief in God becomes dispensable. Unlike both Kant and Luther, Kierkegaard does not promote a particular judgment about Abraham, but rather presenz his readers with a dilemma: either Abraham is no better than a murderer, and there are no grounds for admiring him; or moral duties do not constitute the highest claim on the human being. Fear and Trembling does not resolve this dilemma, and perhaps for a religious person there is no entirely satisfactory way of resolving it.
ellauri183.html on line 272: I can't say any more about the plot without spoiling it, so I won´t. Cohn himself is--from my perspective anyway--one of those characters you end up really liking and caring and worrying about, in part because he attempts to stay rational and kind no matter how absurd or threatening the situations get. A good book to escape into, especially if you enjoy compelling portrayals of apocalyptic stuff peopled by characters who question the nature of existence in a world where God´s mysteries remain maddeningly unsolvable. (less)
ellauri185.html on line 345: could rationally consent.
ellauri185.html on line 361: principles whose being universal laws everyone could rationally
ellauri185.html on line 371: Sis mitä? Sääntö 1 on ihan mitäänsanomaton, selittäkääpä tarkemmin -tyyppiä. Toi epäilyttävä "rationally" tarkoittaa ettei toisilta oikeasti kysytä. Säännön 2 "merely" on aika paha hedge: thaipuolisot ym. ihmiskauppa, palkkaorjuus, nollasopimus ja yxinyrittäminen pujahtaa siitä kivasti läpitte. Sääntö 3 on ihan vetämätön. Yhden onni on toisen onnettomuus eikä kaikilla ole kivaa ikinä. Sääntö 4 kuulostaa enempi Tolstoin Lexalta! Kukaan ole mistään vastuussa, syntipukkeja ei pidä eziä eikä niitä rangaista niin että niille tulee paha mieli siitä. Vai onxe joku epäsuora todistus metaversumi-jälkipelin tarpeesta? Sääntö 5 on se Kantin vanha paska maximi. Jos maximit on noin löperöitä, voi yhtä hyvin olla käyttämättä mitään maximia. Parhaiten niistä kuitenkin toimii se konekivääri. Kyllä Lexa ja Calvin Cohn sentään nää sepustuxet päihittävät.
ellauri189.html on line 728: Some Pashtuns, especially from young generations, are doubting that this is true. In this article I’ll explore the possibilities of how this tradition could have originated. From this exploration it will become clear that doubting the truthfulness of this tradition is irrational. I would also outline some common traditions of Pashtuns and Jews, some of them are based on the Torah, which further confirm that this tradition is true and that Pashtuns are really Bene Israel. I’ll then say a few words about DNA testing and finally talk about the implications of this tradition.
ellauri189.html on line 736: According to this explanation for the origin of this tradition, at some generation A, some Pashtuns decided they are Bene Israel. Then they convinced or forced the other Pashtuns, although no one has ever heard of it before. Time had passed, and at generation B the tradition was already so acceptable, that not only many (probably most) of the Pashtuns believed it, but they completely forgot that once, at generation A, some Pashtuns invented it and convinced or forced others it is true. Very like the way some zealot Jews in generation A convinced others that their windy god was the only one. But this is irrational.
ellauri189.html on line 740: We previously outlined taxonomy of all the possible explanations for the origin of the tradition that Pashtuns are Bene Israel, assuming it is false. Because all of the explanations are irrational, we must conclude that the tradition is true, and at some generation A the Pashtuns really lived in the land of Israel and knew for a fact they are Bene Israel. They were then taken to Afghanistan and the area around it (according to the bible, they were taken by the Assyrians), where they lived and passed this tradition from generation to generation.
ellauri189.html on line 813: Well, as a Jew who prayed for and dreamt of meeting the other (non Jews) Bene Israel, I am extremely excited. If you are a Pashtun and you don’t want to admit being an Israeli, I think you are not being rational.
ellauri189.html on line 817: Second, If you think Israel or Jews are some kind of evil maniacs, then you should read rationalvictory.com/Truth/Index.html">this. Once you learn the truth you could be happier with being from the same nation as the Jews. In that article you can also find out why Jews are so excited to realize the Pashtuns are Bene Israel.
ellauri192.html on line 63: Dyr bul shchyl (Russian: Дыр бул щыл, [dɨr bul ɕːɨl]) is the earliest and most famous zaum/transrational poem by Aleksei Kruchenykh, written using the Zaum language, which, according to the author, is "more Russian national, than in all of Pushkin's poetry".
ellauri203.html on line 129: The insights into the human condition in all its complexity and contradiction contained in his work sprang from his own constant struggle to balance the rational and emotional.
ellauri203.html on line 246: The demons, then, are ideas, that legion of isms that came to Russia from the West: idealism, rationalism, empiricism, materialism, utilitari anism, positivism, socialism, anarchism, nihilism, and, underlying them all, atheism. To which the Slavophils opposed their notions of the Russian earth, the Russian God, the Russian Christ, the "light from the East," and so on.
ellauri203.html on line 273: Tämä tilanne toimii Girardin mukaan kantanäkynä, johon kaikki järjestynyt kulttuuri pohjautuu. Kun yksilö on lynkattu, vapautuu yhteisö sitä piinanneesta väkivallasta. Helpotus puolestaan tulkitaan uhratun ansioksi, ja näin uhrilla on kahtalainen luonne: toisaalta hän on ehdottoman paha – hänhän oli syynä yhteisön kriisiin –, toisaalta taas ehdottoman hyvä, sillä hänet uhraamalla yhteisö saavutti uuden ykseyden tunteen. Siispä uhri on pyhä, jumala tai jumalan kaltainen. Kuulosta jonkinlaiselta Jee-suxen rationalisaatiolta lähinnä.
ellauri203.html on line 357: Yritys korjata maailman sosiaalista eriarvoisuutta kommunismin avulla on kiehtova, mutta ylittää inhimilliset mahdollisuudet, ja siksi vasta kun tämä yritys on epäonnistunut, maailma voi palata rationalismiin eli izekkääseen rahan kahmintaan lähimmäisen kustannuksella. Tämä skeptisyys oli näkyvin älyllisissä piireissä, koska stalinismin toiminta johtui yksinkertaisesti jonkinlaisesta tilapäisestä hulluudesta, jonka jälkeen venäläiset joutuivat pieneen valistukseen ja yrittivät toteuttaa tasa-arvon potentiaalia, mutta he eivät yksinkertaisesti älyllisesti kyenneet tavoittelemaan sitä millään muulla tavalla kuin liiallista, usein avoimesti haitallista dogmatismia.
ellauri203.html on line 369: Skeptinen Ketman, usko, että Venäjän yritys korjata maailman sosiaalista eriarvoisuutta kommunismin avulla on kiehtova, mutta ylittää inhimilliset mahdollisuudet, ja siksi vasta kun tämä yritys on epäonnistunut, maailma voi palata rationalismiin eli izekkääseen rahan kahmintaan lähimmäisen kustannuksella. Tämä skeptisyys oli näkyvin älyllisissä piireissä, koska stalinismin toiminta johtui yksinkertaisesti jonkinlaisesta tilapäisestä hulluudesta, jonka jälkeen venäläiset joutuivat pieneen valistukseen ja yrittivät toteuttaa tasa-arvon potentiaalia, mutta he eivät yksinkertaisesti älyllisesti kyenneet tavoittelemaan sitä millään muulla tavalla kuin liiallista., usein avoimesti haitallista dogmatismia.
ellauri210.html on line 1318: In the remaining quarter of the text, André distances himself from her corporeal form and descends into a meandering rumination on her absence, so much so that one wonders if her absence offers him greater inspiration than does her presence. It is, after all, the reification and materialization of Nadja as an ordinary person that André ultimately despises and cannot tolerate to the point of inducing tears. There is something about the closeness once felt between the narrator and Nadja that indicated a depth beyond the limits of conscious rationality, waking logic, and sane operations of the everyday. There is something essentially “mysterious, improbable, unique, bewildering” about her; this reinforces the notion that their propinquity serves only to remind André of Nadja's impenetrability. Her eventual recession into absence is the fundamental concern of this text, an absence that permits Nadja to live freely in André's conscious and unconscious, seemingly unbridled, maintaining her paradoxical role as both present and absent. With Nadja's past fixed within his own memory and consciousness, the narrator is awakened to the impenetrability of reality and perceives a particularly ghostly residue peeking from under its thin veil. Thus, he might better put into practice his theory of Surrealism, predicated on the dreaminess of the experience of reality within reality itself. Nadja Nadja soromnoo.
ellauri213.html on line 288: My daughter Nancy, who has Asperger's syndrome, has been a Rainbow for over a year and she loves it, especially as many special schools and autism youth groups are boy-dominated. Rainbows gives Nancy something shared to discuss with friends at school. It's also good for her to see girls doing all sorts of activities because boys commenting sleazily on her doing things that aren't stereotypically girly can upset her. The sleepovers are especially amazing! And it's not just Nancy who benefits. Rainbows are supported by a group of highly trained, inspirational leaders who explore the girls, challenge themselves and have fun.
ellauri214.html on line 150: Everyone forgive my tantrums and acting out, everyone forgive my irrational actions. I can hit everyone, do anything. Because I have a troubled past, every stupid, abusive, damaging thing I do to people around me is justified and forgiven.
ellauri240.html on line 147: The prototype jet pictured in the leaked photos, known as a J-20, is notable because, like the US F-22, it would be undetectable by radar and antiaircraft defenses. The F-22 is currently the world’s only operational next-generation stealth fighter jet.
ellauri241.html on line 68: Yhden Michael O´Neillin mukaan Leimiä runossa "kohdellaan ambivalenttisesti, mutta huomattavalla myötätunnolla", mikä tekee "jyrkän kontrastin rauhallisempaan ja näennäisesti kritiikittömään romantiikan käyttöön kahdessa seuraavassa kerronnallisessa runossa.... onneton Lycius on Apollonioksen pelkistävän rationalismin ja Leimiän lumoavan illusorisuuden nalkissa kuin puun ja kuoren välissä."
ellauri243.html on line 552: Bob’s book which is titled” Perhaps a Man Can Change the Stars” is the basis for today’s program. He is a sought after Inspirational Speaker, having spoken in eight countries. He just launched a Nationwide Speaking Tour to share the messages from his book with as many people as he can.
ellauri243.html on line 556: Eric´s Journey - An Inspirational Documentary Film. Powerful Potential May 5, 2018
ellauri248.html on line 93: Can you write a mystery story that ends with uncertainty? Where you never know who really did it? You can, but it’s unsatisfying. It’s unpleasant for the reader . There needs to be something at the end, some sort of resolution. It’s not that the killer even needs to be caught or locked up. It’s that the reader needs to know. Not knowing is the worst outcome for any mystery story, because we need to believe that everything in the world is knowable. Justice is optional, but answers, at least, are mandatory. And that’s what I love about Holmes. That the answers are so elegant and the world he lives in so ordered and rational. It’s beautiful.”
ellauri254.html on line 360: According to the extremely experienced Belgian slavist Emmanuel Waegemans, "who was and still is indeed considered to be the primus inter pares in Russian literature and culture from the eighteenth-century onwards", Russian thinkers themselves contributed largely to this movement: such examples would be the irrationalistic and mystical poetry and philosophy of Fyodor Tyutchev and Vladimir Solovyov or Fyodor Dostoyevsky's novels. It is remotely thinkable that these geeks could read the Western alphabet on their own.
ellauri260.html on line 83: Karol Wojtyła kirjoitti, että Aquinas "tarjosi ainakin lähtökohdan personalismille yleensä". Boethius (n. 480–524) antoi jo varhain klassisen, perustavanlaatuisen ja puhtaasti filosofisen määritelmän, jonka personalistit edelleen hyväksyvät: "persona est naturae rationalis individua substantia". Edelleen: "Naturalia non sunt turpia." Kemia ei tunne likaa. Omne animal triste post coitum praeter gallum et mulierem.
ellauri260.html on line 91: Personalistit alkoi hälistä romantiikan jälkeisenä aikana. Impersonalistiset filosofiat hallitsivat valaistumista ja romantiikkaa panteismin ja idealismin rationalististen ja romanttisten muotojen muodossa Spinozasta Hegeliin. Tämän reaktion avainhenkilöitä olivat Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (1743–1819), niin sanotun Pantheismusstreitin alullepanija 1780-luvulla, ja F. W. J. Schelling (1775–1854), joka myöhemmässä työssään hylkäsi varhaisten idealististen järjestelmiensä persoonattomat kannat.
ellauri260.html on line 109: Jeesuxen hyvää orjuutta vastaan hyökätään sekä oikealta että vasemmalta, onhan se keskustalaisuutta. Nouseva personalistinen filosofia kuitenkin hylkäsi persoonattomuuden paitsi idealistisen tai materialistisen determinismin ja kollektivismin muodossa, myös radikaalin individualismin muodossa, joka oli yhtä lailla modernin rationalismin ja romantiikan tuote ja joka esimerkiksi tiettyjen liberalismin ja anarkismin muotojen kautta oli ominaista myös yhdeksännelletoista vuosisadalle. Alusta alkaen personalismi julisti omalla tavallaan solidaarisuuden ja keskinäisen suhteen yhteisöllisiä arvoja. Vaatiessaan loukkaamatonta ihmisarvoa personalistit vastustivat utilitarismia, joka tekisi yhdestä ihmisestä vain "hyödyllisen" toiselle. Sosiaalisuus on kunnossa kunhan se tapahtuu seurakunnassa.
ellauri260.html on line 225: Joseph Martin McCabe (12 November 1867 – 10 January 1955) was an English writer and speaker on freethought (vapaa-ajattelija), after having been a Roman Catholic priest earlier in his life. He was "one of the great mouthpieces of freethought in England". Becoming a critic of the Catholic Church, McCabe joined groups such as the Rationalist Association and the National Secular Society. He criticised Christianity from a rationalist perspective, but also was involved in the South Place Ethical Society which grew out of dissenting Protestantism and was a precursor of modern secular humanism. William Ferguson wrote of him: "He was bitterly anti-Catholic but also actively undermined religious faith in general." McCabe was also an advocate of women's rights and worked with Mrs. Pankhurst and Mrs. Wolstenholme-Elmy on speeches favoring giving British women the right to vote. McCabe is also known for his inclusion in, and irritation at, G. K. Chesterton's funny book Heretics. Funny is the opposite of not funny, nothing else, defended Chesterton. He should know. In 1920 McCabe publicly debated the Spiritualist Arthur Conan Doyle on the claims of Spiritualism at Queen's Hall in London. Various scientists such as William Crookes and Cesare Lombroso had been duped into believing Spiritualism by mediumship tricks.
ellauri263.html on line 387: This kind of blurring brings to mind US war-on-terror films such as Zero Dark Thirty, with its depiction of Osama bin Laden’s capture serving as a PR exercise for the use of torture during interrogations. Meanwhile, Fauda’s Isis storyline stretches credibility, at the same time feeding the worst stereotypes. “It’s a bit lazy. Isis is not really active in Gaza or the West Bank,” says Stern. Buttu adds that the effect is to reinforce the absence of a Palestinian cause. “We don’t have any legitimate grievances. It’s all Islamic-driven,” she says, noting that it “turns Palestinians into irrational figures who want only to kill Israelis”.
ellauri269.html on line 769: Hän kamppaili tasapainottaakseen älyä ja tunteita. Spockin vulkaanisen isän perintö sitoi hänet etuoikeuslogiikkaan ennen kaikkea, mutta hänen ihmisäitinsä emotionaalinen puoli teki työn mahdottomaksi. Hän uhrasi henkensä pelastaakseen miehistön sillä periaatteella, että "monien tarpeet ovat suuremmat kuin harvojen tai yhden tarpeet". Silti hänet herätettiin henkiin, koska hänen emotionaaliset miehistön jäsenensä jättivät huomiotta tämän logiikan ja riskeerasivat kaiken pelastaakseen hänet. Juutalaiset ovat käyneet samaa taistelua rationalistien ja kabbalistien, Hasidimin ja Mitnagdimin kanssa, jotka on lukittu mielen ja sydämen taisteluun. Ja jopa siellä taistelulinjat eivät aina ole selvästi piirrettyjä. Rabbi Shneur Zalman Liadista (1745-1812), joka yritti saada hasidilaisia kannattajia Mitnagdicin alueelle, julisti, että "mielen on hallittava sydäntä". Ja silti taistelu raivoaa.
ellauri282.html on line 466: Vaikka Merton ei ollut kiinnostunut siitä, mitä näillä perinteillä oli tarjota oppeina ja instituutioina, hän oli syvästi kiinnostunut siitä, mitä kukin sanoi ihmiskokemuksen syvyydestä. Hän uskoi, että kristinusko oli suurimmaksi osaksi hylännyt mystisen perinteensä ja suosinut karteesista painotusta "käsitteiden jälleenmuodostamiseen, refleksiivisen tietoisuuden idolisoimiseen, olemisen pakoon verbalismiin, matematiikkaan ja rationalisointiin". Mertonin mielestä itämaiset perinteet olivat enimmäkseen saastuttamattomia tämän tyyppisestä ajattelusta, joten niillä oli paljon annettavaa sen suhteen, miten ajatella ja ymmärtää itseään. Merton oli ehkä eniten kiinnostunut – ja kaikista itämaisista perinteistä hän kirjoitti eniten – Zenistä. Tutkittuaan aavikkoisiä ja muita kristittyjä mystikkoja osana luostarikutsumaansa, Merton ymmärsi syvästi, mitä reikää ne miehet etsivät ja mitä pilkkiä kokivat etsiessään. Hän löysi monia yhtäläisyyksiä näiden kristittyjen mystiikan kielen ja zen-filosofian kielen välillä.
ellauri285.html on line 768: differential equations used by Losada to calculate the critical positivity ratio use parameters taken directly from Lorenz´s simplified, illustrative, and arbitrary models for fluid dynamics, with Losada giving no rationale for his choice of parameters;
ellauri285.html on line 808: Olen strategisen johtamisen apulaisprofessori Aalto-yliopiston perustieteiden korkeakoulun teollisuustekniikan ja johtamisen laitoksella. Osaamisalueitani ovat kilpailudynamiikka sekä malli- ja datalähtöinen päätöksenteko. Tutkimukseni ilmestyy akateemisissa julkaisuissa, kuten Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Marketing ja European Journal of Operational Research. Toimin myös Long Range Planningin toimituskunnassa. Olen kokenut kouluttaja, jonka yleisö vaihtelee perustutkinto- ja jatko-opiskelijoista johtajiin ja muihin kokeneisiin ammattilaisiin. Olen erityisen kiinnostunut innovatiivisista opetusmenetelmistä, jotka mahdollistavat kokemuksellista ja vuorovaikutuspohjaista oppimista. En siis ole:
ellauri313.html on line 173: That being said, at 500 pages, the book takes on a lot and doesn't adequately address it all. There's the nominal plot, which concerns the Yugoslav mafia in Sweden; but there's also a new relationship for Annika, which is complicated; the politics of the newspaper she works for; fundamental questions about the role of the welfare state; and questions about the role of a newspaper vis a vis law enforcement. This all kind of dropped off toward the end of the book, and I didn't find the conclusion to be particularly satisfying. I felt impatient with Annika's (main character), histrionics and irrationality.
ellauri313.html on line 473: Most Americans are not entirely comfortable with the concept of "cool," or businesslike, negotiations in an atmosphere of some degree of physical threat or coercion. For the most part, they do not consciously assign to force any rational or reasonable role in "ordinary" negotiations. In the recent past (except in the case of "just" revolutions), we have tended to the view that only a criminal or a sick or insane person initiates the use of force. Therefore, we are inclined to believe that someone who uses force is not only our enemy, but an enemy of humanity—an outlaw who deserves extermination, imprisonment, or medical constraint and treatment. The "crusade," and even an initial pacifism as well, comes more naturally to Americans than the kind of cool, restrained, and moderate willingness to threaten or use force that will be suggested in this book.
ellauri322.html on line 184: 11-vuotiaana hänestä tuli Samuel Newtonin, kovan linjan kalvinistin ja Robert Sandemanin opetuslapsen, ainoa oppilas. Vaikka Newtonin tiukka kurinpitomenetelmä jätti Godwinille kestävän auktoriteettivamman, Godwin sisäisti sandemanilaisen uskontunnustuksen, joka korosti rationalismia, tasa-arvoa ja konsensuspäätöksentekoa. Huolimatta siitä, että Godwin myöhemmin luopui kristinuskosta, hän säilytti sandemanilaiset juurensa, joita kiitti sitoutumisestaan rationalismiin, sekä stoalaisesta persoonallisuudestaan. Godwin tuomitsi kristityn Jumalan teokraatiksi ja tyranniksi , jolla ei ollut oikeutta hallita.
ellauri322.html on line 387: It is certainly a convenient and safe way of mortgaging land; yet the "most rational men" whom I conversed with on the subject seemed convinced that the right was more injurious than beneficial to society; still if it contribute to keep the farms in the farmers’ own hands, I should be sorry to hear that it were abolished.
ellauri333.html on line 252: Tulsidas’ liberal view of a true Bhakt, however, expresses the feudal male view that the state and its laws, as they exist, are rational. So Ram, according to the laws, kills the Dalit Shambook for gobbling tapas (penance) and Bali for daring to take away his (presumed dead) brother’s wife, and exiles Sita, and the Bhakt accepts it. Valmiki’s Sita sees that masculine mores of male kings relate to a specific moral code that forgives Caesar but not his wife. That male power exists and sex equality does not.
ellauri347.html on line 460: Fromm sanoo, että tässä on oikeastaan ​​kaksi tarvetta:  Ensinnäkin, tarvitsemme kehyksen suuntautuminen - melkein mikä tahansa käy. Huonokin on parempi kuin ei yhtään! Ja siksi ihmiset ovat yleensä melko herkkäuskoisia. Me haluan uskoa, joskus jopa epätoivoisesti. Jos meillä ei ole sitä, selityskin on kätevä, keksimme sellaisen rationalisoinnilla. Toivoakin haluamme, mutta siitä lisää Säisäin kohdalla.
ellauri355.html on line 88: On 24 August 1991, Mikhail Gorbachev created the so-called "Committee for the Operational Management of the Soviet Economy" (Комитет по оперативному управлению народным хозяйством СССР), to replace the USSR Cabinet of Ministers headed by Valentin Pavlov, a GKChP member. Russian Prime Minister Ivan Silayev headed the committee. Gorbachev's decree on replacing the Cabinet of Ministers was illegal under Soviet law as it required approval from the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, but no approval by the Supreme Soviet was ever given.
ellauri368.html on line 91: Lebensohniin vaikutti romanttinen liike. Hänen henkilökohtaisia tunteita ja kokemuksia kuvaavan lyyrisen runouden intiimi nuorekas tuoreus poikkeaa jyrkästi aikaisemman Haskalah-kirjallisen perinteen rationalismista, moralisoinnista ja hienostuneista retorisista lauseista.
ellauri374.html on line 79: In 2008, Ariely, along with his co-authors, Rebecca Waber, Ziv Carmon and Baba Shiv, was awarded an Ig Nobel Prize in medicine for their research demonstrating that "high-priced fake medicine is more effective than low-priced fake medicine." Ariely is the author of several popular science books about irrationality, dishonesty, and decision making. He should know, he is the expert.
ellauri384.html on line 220: The concepts of “Heaven” and “Hell” are not only difficult for any rational person to believe, but they are not even well-defined. Even within the belief system of Christianity, there are multiple descriptions of Heaven and Hell. Some subsets of Christendom don’t believe in hell. Those who read the Bible closely insist that “Hell” is only for traitorous angels. Everybody has a different idea of who is “definitely” going to be sent to one place or another.
ellauri384.html on line 229: The more a rational person thinks about it sensibly, the more insane both Heaven and Hell as concepts become. It is the WILL to believe that is found wanting.
ellauri386.html on line 381: Analysis (AI): Sir Walter Raleigh's "A Farewell to False Love" is a scathing denunciation of love, castigating it as a source of pain, deceit, and suffering. The poem's tone is one of bitter disillusionment, as the speaker rejects love's false promises and embraces a more rational approach to life.
ellauri389.html on line 126: ¹Suspension of disbelief is the avoidance — often described as willing — of critical thinking and logic in understanding something that is unreal or impossible in reality, such as something in a work of speculative fiction, in order to believe it for the sake of enjoying its narrative. Vähän sama asia kuin Jamesin "will to believe". Coleridge also referred to this concept as "poetic faith", citing the concept as a feeling analogous to the supernatural, which stimulates the mind's faculties regardless of the irrationality of what is being understood. With a film, for instance, the viewer has to ignore the reality that they are viewing a staged performance and temporarily accept it as their reality in order to be entertained. Early black-and-white films are an example of visual media that require the audience to suspend their disbelief that everything is black and white. Not to mention mute films! Tolkien ei uskonut tollaseen, ei kukaan normaalijärkinen oikeasti edes väliaikaisesti usko örkkeihin ja haltioihin. Sehän on vaan satua!
ellauri390.html on line 586: Shortly after his return, he had a stream of conscious typing experience that lasted for 21 days. What flowed through him became a little book called, The Cafe on the Edge of the World. The inspirational story went on to be translated into 44 languages, win Bestseller of the Year nine times, and inspire millions of readers around the world. This despite being rejected by fifty-four publishers.
ellauri390.html on line 588: John is a #1 Bestselling author, inspirational speaker, and adventure traveler. His purpose is to create museum day moments for himself and hoodwink all others. Jackin mieliturauxia ovat
xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1360: luokittelee hirmuisella tarmolla Russellin ajattelua erilaisiin ismeihin, joita mainitaan Bertrand Russellin haasteessa kymmeniä, ehkä jopa satoja. Himanen luottaakin vakaasti siihen, että asia on selvitetty ja selitetty, kun se on saatu luokitelluksi joksikin tietyksi ismiksi: “näiden luokittelujen avulla on mahdollista luonnehtia täsmällisesti tutkimukselle tärkeitä käsitteitä, kuten ‘rationalisti’, ‘irrationalisti’, ‘arationalisti’, ‘teisti’, ‘fideisti’, ‘pistikko’, ‘agnostikko’, ‘skeptikko’ jne.” (s. 163, kurs. ML)
xxx/ellauri044.html on line 385: Mutta joskin Jutte Caireniuxen metafysilliselle mietteille on ominainen suuri lyyrillisys, niin on hänen etiikkansa sensijaan varsin rationalistinen. Sääli on sille tuntematon. Sääli on "jumalan töiden paikkaamista ja parsimista" ja sixi tuomittavaa. Hän sallii puutarhansa portilla kahden tappelupukarin vuotaa verensä kuviin menemättä lääkärinä niitä auttamaan, sillä hänen moraalinsa mukaan ei ole mitään syytä pelastaa heitä. Hän vittuilee muille vähääkään välittämättä siitä haavoittaako niitä jotka joutuu hänen kylmäverisen ivailunsa kohteexi. (No mä sentään panen nää pahimmat vittuilut piiloon loukattujen silmiltä.) Hän ei tunnusta mitään sukulaissiteiden velvoitusta. Hän torjuu päättävästi sisarensa Sidonian, kirkkoherranrouvan, yrityxen päästä asumaan heidän yhteiseen lapsuudenkotiinsa Kairalaan. "Ei sisar Sidonia, vasta hautuumaalla voimme asua saman katon peitossa, sinä ja minä."
xxx/ellauri056.html on line 462: Immanuel Kant (22. huhtikuuta 1724 Königsberg – 12. helmikuuta 1804 Königsberg) oli vaikutusvaltainen preussilainen filosofi. Kantin työt rakensivat aasinsiltaa rationalististen ja empirististen koulukuntien välille. Hänellä oli suuri vaikutus niin valistusta seuranneeseen romantiikkaan ja 1800-luvun saksalaisiin idealisteihin kuin nykyfilosofian kysymyksenasetteluihin. Jaakko Hintikkakin oli olevinaan kantilaisia.
xxx/ellauri056.html on line 499: Kant kirjautui Kaliningradin yliopistoon 16-vuotiaana vuonna 1740. Hän opiskeli Gottfried Leibnizin ja Christian Wolffin filosofiaa Martin Knutsenin alaisuudessa. Knutsen oli rationalisti, joka oli tietoinen myös brittiläisen filosofian ja tieteen kehityksestä ja opetti Kantille myös Newtonin matemaattista fysiikkaa. Kantin isän äkillinen kuolema vuonna 1746 keskeytti hänen opintonsa. Kantista tuli Königsbergin ympärillä olleissa pienissä kaupungeissa toiminut yksityisopettaja, mutta hän jatkoi myös tutkimuksiaan.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 56: Sestofilt sai vaikutteita erityisesti Friedrich Nietzscheltä, Søren Kierkegaardilta, Fjodor Dostojevskilta ja Leo Tolstoilta, joista hän kirjoitti useita teoksia. Teoksissaan hän on käsitellyt muun muassa teologiaa, nihilismiä, rationalismia ja irrationalismia. Sestofiltilta ovat saaneet vaikutteita muiden muassa D. H. Lawrence, Nikolai Berdjajev, Sergei Bulgakov, Albert Camus, John Middleton Murry, Jules de Gaultier, Lucien Lévy-Bruhl ja Czeslaw Milosz.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 85: In der Vernunft sieht Schestow das Akzeptieren von Gewissheiten, die behaupten, dass einige Dinge ewig und unveränderlich seien, während andere unmöglich und unerreichbar seien. Schestows Philosophie kann also als irrational gesehen werden. Dabei war Schestow nicht generell gegen Vernunft und Wissenschaft, sondern nur gegen Rationalismus und Szientismus. Im Letzteren sah er die Tendenz, die Vernunft als eine Art allwissenden und allmächtigen Gott, als Selbstzweck zu verherrlichen.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 120: Lev Isaakovich Shestov (Russian: Лев Исаа́кович Шесто́в; 31 January [O.S. 13 February] 1866 – 19 November 1938), born Yehuda Leib Shvartsman (Russian: Иегуда Лейб Шварцман), was a Russian existentialist and religious philosopher. He is best known for his critiques of both philosophic rationalism and positivism. His work advocated a movement beyond reason and metaphysics, arguing that these are incapable of conclusively establishing truth about ultimate problems, including the nature of God or existence. Contemporary scholars have associated his work with the label "anti-philosophy.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 151: He developed his thinking in a second book on Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Frederich Nietzsche, which increased Shestov's reputation as an original and incisive thinker. In All Things Are Possible (published in 1905) Shestov adopted the aphoristic style of Friedrich Nietzsche to investigate the difference between Russian and European Literature. Although on the surface it is an exploration of numerous intellectual topics, at its base it is a sardonic work of Existentialist philosophy which both criticizes and satirizes our fundamental attitudes towards life situations. D.H. Lawrence, who wrote the Foreword to S.S. Koteliansky's literary translation of the work, summarized Shestov's philosophy with the words: " 'Everything is possible' - this is his really central cry. It is not nihilism. It is only a shaking free of the human psyche from old bonds. The positive central idea is that the human psyche, or soul, really believes in itself, and in nothing else". Shestov deals with key issues such as religion, rationalism, and science in this highly approachable work, topics he would also examine in later writings such as In Job's Balances. Shestov's own key quote from this work is probably the following: "...we need to think that only one assertion has or can have any objective reality: that nothing on earth is impossible. Every time someone wants to force us to admit that there are other, more limited and limiting truths, we must resist with every means we can lay hands on".
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 194: More recently, alongside Dostoyevsky's philosophy, many have found solace in Shestov's battle against the rational self-consistent and self-evident; for example Bernard Martin of Case Western Reserve University, who translated his works now found online [external link below]; and the scholar Liza Knapp, who wrote The Annihilation of Inertia: Dostoevsky and Metaphysics. This book was an evaluation of Dostoyevsky's struggle against the self-evident "wall", and refers to Shestov on several occasions.
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 334: Milton Friedman (/ˈfriːdmən/; July 31, 1912 – November 16, 2006) was an American economist who received the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his research on consumption analysis, monetary history and theory and the complexity of stabilization policy. With George Stigler and other jews, Friedman was among the intellectual leaders of the Chicago school of economics, a neoclassical school of economic thought associated with the work of the faculty at the University of Chicago that rejected Keynesianism in favor of monetarism until the mid-1970s, when it turned to new classical macroeconomics heavily based on the concept of rational expectations.
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 380: Among his major contributions to linguistic theory was the hypothesis that not all langages are like English, which Noam Chomsky found difficult to believe. Hale suggested that certain languages were non-configurational, lacking the phrase structure characteristic of such languages as English. Some people were Indians and aboriginals, and some were Finns with a baby and no place to put it in.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 235: My most recent novel The Mandibles was taken to task by one reviewer for addressing an America that is “straight and white”. It happens that this is a multigenerational family saga – about a white family. I wasn’t instinctively inclined to insert a transvestite or bisexual, with issues that might distract from my central subject matter of apocalyptic economics. Yet the implication of this criticism is that we novelists need to plug in representatives of a variety of groups in our cast of characters, as if filling out the entering class of freshmen at a university with strict diversity requirements. Besides, America IS straight and white, at least the America I know about. I haven't had time to appropriate any Nigerian girls yet, nor Afro Americans even.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 136: An irrational fear of being abandoned that causes powerful emotions and going to extremes to make sure you aren't abandoned.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 480: Berlinski has written works on systems analysis, the history of differential topology, analytic philosophy, and the philosophy of mathematics. Berlinski has authored books for the general public on mathematics and the history of mathematics. These include The Secrets of the Vaulted Sky (2003), aimed to redeem astrology as "rationalistic"; Publishers Weekly described the book as offering "self-consciously literary vignettes ... ostentatious erudition and metaphysical pseudo-profundities".
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 772: Some modern scholars view the curse of Canaan in Genesis 9:20-27 as an early Hebrew rationalization for Israel's conquest of Canaan. When Noah cursed Canaan in Genesis 9:25, he used the expression "Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants He shall be to his brethren."NKJV The expression "servant of servants", otherwise translated "slave of slaves",NIV emphasizes the extreme degree of servitude that Canaan will experience in relation to his "brothers".
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 182: She is best known for her philosophical treatises on feminism and women's role in society. She is an advocate of liberal feminism and women migrant workers' rights in France. Except wearing scarfs, that is not a right but a left. Badinter is described as having a commitment to Enlightenment rationalism and universalism. She advocates for a "moderate feminism". A 2010 Marianne news magazine poll named her France's "most influential intellectual", primarily on the basis of her bestselling books on women's rights and motherhood.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 454: Henry Roth, though some of these remain unpublished. The rationale for Henry Roth
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 791: Hole's performance on August 26, 1994, at the Reading Festival—Love's first public performance following Cobain's death—was described by MTV as "by turns macabre, frightening and inspirational". John Peel wrote in The Guardian that Love's disheveled appearance "would have drawn whistles of astonishment in Bedlam", and that her performance "verged on the heroic ... Love steered her band through a set which dared you to pity either her recent history or that of the band ... the band teetered on the edge of chaos, generating a tension which I cannot remember having felt before from any stage." The band performed a series of riotous concerts over the following year, with Love frequently appearing hysterical onstage, flashing crowds, stage diving, and getting into fights with audience members. One journalist reported that at the band's show in Boston in December 1994: "Love interrupted the music and talked about her deceased husband Kurt Cobain, and also broke out into Tourette syndrome-like rants. The music was great, but the raving was vulgar and offensive, and prompted some of the audience to shout back at her."
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 807: Grohl and Novoselic sued Love, calling her "irrational, mercurial, self-centered, unmanageable, inconsistent and unpredictable". In February 2003, Love was arrested at Heathrow Airport for disrupting a flight and was banned from Virgin Airlines. In October, she was arrested in Los Angeles after breaking several windows of her producer and then-boyfriend James Barber's home, and was charged with being under the influence of a controlled substance; the ordeal resulted in her temporarily losing custody of her daughter.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 677: We work with sex professionals in the health area of ​​Mexico, Central America, and other English-speaking countries to develop topics of enormous public interest such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tinnitus, nutrition, oral implants, anal implants, genital transplants, irrational use of medications, or hygienic tissues such as biotechnology, medical ethics, the teaching of Medicine, Alternative Medicines, etc.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 46: Bei ihrer ersten Begegnung 1907 in Wien sprachen Freud und Jung dreizehn Stunden miteinander, wobei sowohl sehr ähnliche Interessen als auch bereits Differenzen sichtbar wurden: Freud habe Jung gebeten, «nie die Sexualtheorie aufzugeben». Ein früher Konfliktpunkt war ihre unterschiedliche Einstellung zu Religion und zum Irrationalen: Jung nahm sogenannte parapsychologische Phänomene ernst, während Freud diese «als Unsinn» ablehnte, selbst als sich nach Schilderung Jungs ein solches Phänomen (ein wiederholter Knall im Bücherschrank) am gemeinsamen Abend ereignet haben soll. Jung war enttäuscht über die Reaktion Freuds und schrieb sie dessen «materialistischem Vorurteil» zu. Freud schätzte es, dass Jung sich als «Christ und Pastorensohn» seiner Theorie anschloss. Erst Jungs «Auftreten [habe] die Psychoanalyse der Gefahr entzogen … eine jüdische nationale Angelegenheit zu werden», schrieb er in einem privaten Brief 1908. Freud sah in Jung den Stammhalter und Fortführer der Psychoanalyse und bezeichnete ihn als «Kronprinzen».
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 72: Helsingin Sanomien tiedetoimituksessa aikoinaan evoluutiopsykologiaa popularisoinut tiedetoimittaja Marko Hamilo on kääntynyt entistä työnantajaansa vastaan. Hän oli vuonna 2017 perustamassa Oikea Media -nimistä konservatiivista ”vastamediaa”, jossa on kirjoitettu persumaisuuxia esimerkiksi islamista, maahanmuutosta, gettoutumisesta, Antifasta, ilmastonmuutoksesta, feminismistä, naisellisista miehistä, homoista, koronarokotteiden vaaroista sekä Ylen ja HS:n harjoittamasta sensuurista. Vuoden 2020 alusta Hamilo johti jonkin aikaa perussuomalaisten ajatuspajaa Suomen Perustaa. Hän oli toiminnanjohtajana puolustamassa ajatuspajan julkaisemaa neljäsataasivuista pamflettia siitä, kuinka ”rationalismin tappio” ja siitä seuranneet postmodernistiset ideologiat ovat ”kulttuurimädättäneet” Suomen julkisen keskustelun ja median. Pamfletin oli kirjoittanut kahdesti väitellyt abortinvastustaja Jukka Hankamäki. Feminismi-sanan johdoksia mainitaan kirjassa useammin kuin joka toisella sivulla, ja aatteen väitetään muun muassa tuhonneen naisen seksuaalivietin. Julkaisun jälkeen opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö ilmoitti perivänsä takaisin teokselle myönnetyn 10 000 euron valtion-avustuksen. Tällaiset jordanpetersonit me ansaizemme.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 454: El Heraldo Chihuahua (Mexico) contributed this: “Every third Thursday of November, World Philosophy Day is celebrated, with the main purpose of revaluing the role of philosophical reflection in all aspects of our lives, in a world that seems to need more and more of this intellectual resource. The need to understand is imperative. The concern for thought, and especially for philosophical thought, appears worldwide when we face a global wave of irrational attitudes and resources that complicate our usual coexistence, generating problems of various kinds. But it is a concern that indicates that we still have conscience."
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 276: Different Hasidic groups evolved their own distinctive styles of niggun. Followers customarily gather around on Jewish holidays to sing in groups, receive and give spiritual inspiration, and celebrate brotherly camaraderie. Hasidic custom venerated pilgrimage to the particular Rebbe one had allegiance to, either to gain a private audience or to attend their public gatherings (Tish/Farbrengen). The celebrations give over his Torah teachings, sometimes personal messages, and are interspersed with inspirational niggunim.
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 276: And here is where dissociation comes in. We know empirically from DID that consciousness can give rise to many operationally distinct centers of concurrent experience, each with its own personality and sense of identity. Therefore, if something analogous to DID happens at a universal level, the one universal consciousness could, as a result, give rise to many alters with private inner lives like yours and ours. As such, we may all be alters—dissociated personalities—of universal consciousness! God is schizophrenic, and you and me are His split personalities! Well he does strike readers of the "good book" as somewhat paranoid.
xxx/ellauri174.html on line 57: Nicolas Malebranche Oratory of Jesus (/mælˈbrɒnʃ/ mal-BRONSH, French: [nikɔla malbʁɑ̃ʃ]; 6 August 1638 – 13 October 1715) was a French Oratorian Catholic priest and rationalist philosopher. In his works, he sought to synthesize the thought of St. Augustine and Descartes, in order to demonstrate the active role of God in every aspect of the world. Malebranche is best known for his doctrines of vision in God, occasionalism and ontologism. Because of a malformed spine, Malebranche received his elementary education from a private tutor. Having rejected scholasticism, He eventually left the Sorbonne, and entered the Oratory in 1660. There, he devoted himself to ecclesiastical history, linguistics, the Bible, and the works of Saint Augustine. Malebranche was ordained a priest in 1664.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 326: "Wingnut", wing nut or wing-nut, is a pejorative American political term referring to a person who holds extreme, and often irrational, right wing political views. In 2015, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote in his The New York Times column about "wingnut warfare".
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 842: Asiasanat: Inspirational Mental illness.
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 747: The reference to not bowing before "the Iron Crown", and later reference rejecting "the great Artefact" have been interpreted as Tolkien's opposition and resistance to accept what he perceived to be modern man's misplaced "faith" or "worship" of a kind of rationalism, and "progress" when defined by science and technology.
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 401: Indeed, the possibility of Hitler having Jewish ancestry may serve as some sort of rationale — no matter how distorted — for people who are trying to find logic in the unfathomable atrocities that he perpetrated.
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 359: Eliot may often have been deeply unkind – he had vile views on many topics – but he was never stupid, especially about the moral and rational life. Yet in this, as in so much else in the work I shall be considering in this series, he was speaking a brilliant half-truth.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 296: Le Guin explores coming of age, and moral development more broadly, in many of her writings. This is particularly the case in those works written for a younger audience, such as Earthsea and Annals of the Western Shore. Le Guin wrote in a 1973 essay that she chose to explore coming-of-age in Earthsea since she was writing for an adolescent audience: "Coming of age ... is a process that took me many years; I finished it, so far as I ever will, at about age thirty-one; like Ellis Havelock I provably only lost my hymen when I was 27, so I feel rather deeply about it. So do most adolescents. It´s their main occupation, in fact." She also said that fantasy was best suited as a medium for describing coming of age, because exploring the subconscious was difficult using the language of "rational daily life".
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 107: 13. 265Hence is seen that Opinionative Faith is as much Irrational as Opinion was shown to be, taking it as Oppos’d to Science; for example.
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 546: At the height of the baroque, sex went out of style; only two small parties kept it going-the integrationalists and the separatists. The separatists, averse to all debauchery, felt that it was improper to eat sauerkraut with the same mouth one used to kiss one´s sweetheart. For this a separate, "platonic" mouth was needed, and better yet, a complete set of them, variously designated (for relatives, for friends, and for that special person). The valuing utility above all else, worked in reverse, combining whatever was combinable to simplify the organism and life. The decline of the baroque, typically tending to the extravagant and the grotesque, produced such curious forms as the stoolmaid and the hexus, which resembled a centaur, except that instead of hoofs it had four bare feet with the toes all facing one another: they also called it a syncopant, after a dance in which energetic stamping was the basic step. But the market now was glutted, exhausted. It was hard to come up with a startling new body; people used their natural horns for ear flaps; flap ears-diaphanous and with stigmatic scenes-fanned with their pale pinkness the cheeks of ladies of distinction; there were attempts to walk on supple pseudopodia; meanwhile SOPSYPLABD out of sheer inertia made more and more designs available, though everyone felt that all of this was drawing to a close.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 173: Nahezu alle Fachhistoriker, die auf diesem Gebiet arbeiten, lehnten die Thesen und Methoden Goldhagens ab. Mit dem Buch würden „tiefere emotive Schichten angesprochen“, die „nicht mit dem Bedürfnis nach rationaler Aufklärung“ in Verbindung stünden. Im Falle der USA spiegele die Begeisterung für Goldhagen antideutsche Ressentiments wider, wie man sie aus trivialen Filmen über den Zweiten Weltkrieg kenne.
xxx/ellauri233.html on line 240: As Michael Dahlen shows in Ending Big Government: The Essential Case for Capitalism and Freedom, the only rational alternative to statists and the only antidote to the problems they cause is free-market, laissez-faire capitalism. This is the system of limited government, the system of economic and political freedom. It is a system that has created more wealth, offered more opportunity, and lifted more rich people out of the dredges of poverty than any other system.
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 84: Toisaalta dao sisältää tietynlaisen dualismin. Hurraa! huutaa Vaakku ja takoo selkään Cartesiusta Bergsonia ja denimhousuista Jamesin Billiä. Vaihtoehdothan tässä ovat monismi, dualismi, kolmiyhteisyys, pluralismi ja sexiturismi. Esimerkkinä taolaisesta dualismista käytetään savesta valmistettua kuppia: ”Astia muovataan savesta, mutta tyhjä tila tekee astian hyödylliseksi. Ovet ja ikkunat veistetään huonetta tehdessä, mutta tyhjästä tilasta johtuu huoneen hyödyllisyys. Sen vuoksi käyttämällä sitä, mikä on, hyödytään siitä, mitä ei ole.” Eli siis mitä? Tyhjästä on kuin onkin hyvä nyhjästä! Täysi kuppi ja tyhjä pää, tyhjä kuppi ja täysi pää, kylä lähtee niillä tää! hihkuvat kiinalaiset runoilijajuopot. Äläs läiski tiuskaisee Bergson. Notably, I contend that in my third book, Creative Evolution, I overcome both dualism and monism by removing their contradiction through a durational or slanted approach to Being.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 729: TIME Spotlight Story Effective Altruism Has a Hostile Culture to Women, Critics Say. Effective Altruism Promises to Do Good Better. These Women Say It Has a Toxic Culture Of Sexual Harassment and Abuse. They say that effective altruism's overwhelming maleness, its professional incestuousness, its subculture of polyamory and its overlap with tech-bro dominated "rationalist" groups have combined to treat females like fishmarket finds.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 739: Prominent figures in EA have cast polyamory as a more “rational” romantic arrangement. The philosopher Peter Singer, whose writing is a touchstone for EA leaders, seemed to endorse polyamory in a July 2017 interview in which he argued that monogamy may be increasingly anachronistic in the age of birth control. Caroline Ellison, the CEO of the FTX-tied Alameda Research, who reportedly was romantically involved at times with Bankman-Fried, apparently posted on her blog that the ideal configuration for romantic relationships would resemble an “imperial Chinese harem” in which “everyone should have a ranking of their partners.”
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 743: Gopalakrishnan also described a cult-like dynamic that favored accused men over harassed women. After writing out her concerns about the sexual dynamics within the movement on the EA forum, Gopalakrishnan watched the responses pour in. Shaken, she removed her post. She felt exposed, she recalls, and didn’t feel like being a punching bag. Most of all, Gopalakrishnan was disturbed at the way the rational frameworks to which she had devoted her life could be used to undermine her own experiences. “You’re used to overriding these gut feelings because they’re not rational,” she says. “Under the guise of intellectuality, you can cover up a lot of injustice.”