1. What are the general logic and the presuppositions of the problem of evil? 2. How can the problem of evil be called into question and how can one develop grammatical methods and philosophical tools to build a successful antitheodicy? 3. How can one develop a grammatical metacritique of the presuppositions of the problem through a philosophical grammar of the underlying language/world and being/meaning-links? 4. How can the grammatical approach to metaphysical questions and to the metacritique of the presuppositions of the problem of evil be used to analyse religious and worldview questions, and articulate ways of existential, humanistic and religious sense-making that overcome the problem?
ellauri151.html on line 616: reality. [...] The grammatical rules applying to it determine the meaning
ellauri151.html on line 619: it; it has a grammatical body behind it, so to speak. Its meaning cannot
ellauri151.html on line 621: grammatical rules with it. They describe its usage subsequently. (LWL:
ellauri153.html on line 322: the Book of Job and the Gospels can be condensed into five grammatical remarks, or rules of
ellauri153.html on line 354: We can now give game-theoretical analogues for the grammatical principles concerning “goodness” and “omnipotence” for the justice-of-God game G. Note that goodness holds by definition.
ellauri153.html on line 424: and strategic grammatical descriptions of the stories about the victory of God, and with
ellauri153.html on line 454: game. Moreover, they capture the essence of God in the stories, as they function as grammatical
ellauri153.html on line 554: Now that the problem of evil has been exposed as a conceptual confusion, the way is clear for a Jamesian science of religions and worldviews. The methods of grammatical description can be extended to the practices and ways of sense-making in different worldviews: how they give meaning to moral practices and how do they approach the intelligibility of the world? What practical responses do they have for coping with evil? For example, the grammar of seeing-as for models and metaphors can be applied to the metaphors in the Hebrew Bible for God’s activity to understand what it is to see the world as God’s creation. The grammar of virtues can be used to describe Buddhist practices and explore, how these approaches contribute to the human good. Similar approaches can be taken to secular worldviews as well. These descriptions can then be used to assess the worldviews through dialogical encounters between them. However, one thing should be clear. There is no point in devaluing the world by arguing for the meaninglessness of life or atheism on the basis of evil, or in giving justifications for evils that can stand in the way of divine or human meliorist projects of fighting for justice. To paraphrase the judgment of the Divine Judge in the Book of Job, such approaches are not even wrong. They are as meaningless as life itself.
ellauri172.html on line 161: Il conte Vittorio Amedeo Alfieri (Asti, 16 gennaio 1749 – Firenze, 8 ottobre 1803) è stato un drammaturgo, poeta, scrittore e autore teatrale italiano. Teatraalinen auktori. Vihtori ja nippu Klaara kotkoja.
ellauri184.html on line 532: However, there were also many Jews, known as "Hellenizers", who viewed Hellenization and social integration of the Jewish people in the Greco-Roman world favourably, and pursued a completely different approach: accepting the Emperor´s decree and even making efforts to restore their foreskins to better assimilate into Hellenistic society. The latter approach was common during the reign of Antiochus, and again under Roman rule. The foreskin was restored by one of two methods, that were later revived in the late 20th century; both were described in detail by the Greek physician Aulus Cornelius Celsus in his comprehensive encyclopedic work De Medicina, written during the reign of Tiberius (14-37 CE). The surgical method involved freeing the skin covering the penis by dissection, and then pulling it forward over the glans; he also described a simpler surgical technique used on men whose prepuce is naturally insufficient to cover their glans. The second approach, known as "epispasm", was non-surgical: a restoration device which consisted of a special weight made of bronze, copper, or leather (sometimes called Pondus Judaeus, i. e. "Jewish burden"), was affixed to the penis, pulling its skin downward. Over time, a new foreskin was generated, or a short prepuce was lengthened, by means of tissue expansion. Martial also mentioned the instrument in Epigrammaton (Book 7:35).
ellauri196.html on line 63: Petrus Ramus (Francogallice Pierre de la Ramée; natus Cuts in oppido anno 1515; mortuus Lutetiae anno 1572) fuit grammaticus, mathematicus, philosophus, et humanista Francicus et regius mathematicae professor apud Collegium Franciae ab anno 1551.
ellauri197.html on line 295: The shift in verb tenses is remarkable in this first stanza to address the narrator’s unclear thoughts that are connected to whatever memory she wishes to “forget.” Within the first two lines of ‘How Happy I Was If I Could Forget’, the reader encounters past tense in “was” and the subjunctive imagined prospect of “if I could forget.” This “if” indicates that this is only a wish the narrator has, meaning it is not past, present, or future because it has not happened and will not definitively ever happen. From there, the narrator turns to the present tense by saying, “how sad I am.” There is no clear way that all of these verb tenses senspibly link up, and this grammatic confusion mirrors how uncertain and shaken the narrator is from this memory’s lingering presence.
ellauri197.html on line 297: This grammatical confusion continues in the third line where there is no subject given for the sentiment. Nothing is stated as the thing that “[w]ould be an easy adversity,” so structurally, the statement lacks clarity. A more correct formulation would be given by
ellauri197.html on line 305: An interesting thing to note, however, is that the “adversity” is treated in a beautiful way by being addressed as a “Bloom.” The capitalization can be written off with the notion that even a bad memory could be important enough to merit capitalization, but a “Bloom” has a connotation of natural beauty and livelihood. This could simply mean the negativity from the circumstance grows with time, but the choice of such a soft verb gives the feeling that the narrator has warm feelings about whatever happened to cause this bad memory—maybe a relationship she loved but lost or a friend who was dear but forsaken. This would again give a reason for the grammatical chaos of the lack of subject and mismatched verb tenses since, it seems, the narrator does not know how she feels about the memory.
ellauri210.html on line 598: Als Hans Giese 1949 ein neues WhK gründen wollte und dann die Gesellschaft für Reform des Sexualstrafrechts e. V. gründete, arbeitete Hiller einige Monate mit.[11] 1955 kehrte Hiller nach Deutschland zurück, ließ sich in Hamburg nieder und versuchte dort 1962, das WhK neu zu gründen. Er blieb dabei aber isoliert und der Versuch scheiterte.[5] Des Weiteren gründete er – weitgehend ohne Echo – einen Neusozialistischen Bund und unabhängige Zeitschriften (vgl. lynx). Die Erklärung des Neusozialistischen Bundes gegen Angriffskrieg wurde u. a. von Ossip K. Flechtheim, Karlheinz Deschner und Martin Niemöller unterstützt. In der Schweizer Zeitschrift Der Kreis publizierte Hiller rund ein Dutzend Gedichte und ebenso viele Artikel, meist unter dem anagrammatischen Pseudonym Keith Llurr.
ellauri216.html on line 164: Toiseen osaan kuuluvat teologiset teokset. Näitä ovat muun muassa Teologian alkeet, Platonilainen teologia (Theologia Platonica), Khrestomatheia, Hymni ja Epigrammata. Kristittyjen toimeenpanemien vainojen vuoksi helleeninen uskonto alkoi kuolla. Proklos opetti kreikkalaisiin myytteihin sisältyvää symbolismia ja analysoi niitä suurella huolella ja viisaudella. Hän esimerkiksi opetti, että kreikkalaisissa myyteissä avioliitto on "luovien voimien jakamaton liitto". Leukavasti laukaistu!
ellauri217.html on line 120: Gematria tai gimatria (hepr. גימטריה < m.kreik. γεωμετρία, geōmetria) tarkoittaa heprealaista numerologiaa tai lukumystiikkaa. Tämä perustuu siihen, että Kreikassa ja hepreassa lukuja ilmaistiin kirjaimilla. Gematriasta voidaan erottaa kaksi eri suuntausta, mystinen ja yleinen. Sana juontaa kreikan geometriaa tarkoittavasta sanasta. Vaikka heprealainen gematria on nykyisin tunnetuinta, kreikkalaiselle aakkoselle tarkoitettu gematria eli isopsefia on sitä useita vuosisatoja vanhempaa. Jakob Böhmen käyttämän symbolin keskellä on kolmio, jossa tetragrammatonin heprealaisista kirjaimista (JHWH) muodostettu tetraktys.
ellauri254.html on line 83: Programmatisch für das serapiontische Prinzip, das „wie Theodor sehr richtig bemerkte, eben nichts weiter heißen wollte, als daß die Serapionsbrüder übereingekommen, sich durchaus niemals mit schlechtem Machwerk zu quälen“, ist die Absage an jede Art von Nachahmungspoetik und jeden sogenannten Realismus. Nicht die Außenwelt soll durch die Dichtung abgebildet werden, sondern es gilt, „das Bild, das dem wahren Künstler im Innern aufgegangen“, durch „poetische Darstellung ins äußere Leben zu tragen“. Wie Serapion, der als weltfremder Eremit nur seinen Visionen folgte, soll auch der Dichter sich von der Einsamkeit als idealer Sphäre seines schöpferischen Geistes inspirieren lassen. Je mehr ihm die Welt zum bloßen Störfaktor wird, desto autonomer, genialer und serapiontischer sein Werk. Indem die fiktiven Erzähler der Novellensammlung über die serapiontische Qualität ihrer Texte diskutieren, wird die ästhetische Reflexion – ganz im Sinne romantischer Poetologie – selbst zum Bestandteil der Poesie. Verwirrend für die Interpreten E.T.A. Hoffmanns sind dabei die für ihn so charakteristischen visionär-phantastischen Projektionen, mit denen er die künstlerische Innenschau mit der alltäglichen Wirklichkeit verbindet und dabei eine typisch serapiontische Mischung aus Phantasie und Realität schafft, die für den Leser nur noch schwer zu entwirren ist.
ellauri269.html on line 724: Lamed is comprised of a kaf and a vav: 20 and 6=26. Twenty-six is the gematria of G‑d's name, the Tetragrammaton Yud-Hei-Vav-Hei. Eikös se ollut myös Leninin peitenimi neuvostojuutalaisten parissa? Stalin oli Samekh. Shin also stands for the word Shaddai, a name for God. Because of this, a kohen(priest) forms the letter Shin with his hands as he recites the Priestly Blessing. In the mid-1960s, actor Leonard Nimoy used a single-handed version of this gesture to create the Vulcan hand salutefor his character, Mr. Spock, on Star Trek. Larry Tye, kirjan Superman: The High-Flying History of America's Most Enduring Hero kirjoittaja, vertasi Supermanin eettisiä sääntöjä – "Truth, Justice, and the American Way" - Mishnan arvoihin "totuus, rauha ja oikeudenmukaisuus". Paizi supermiehellä "rauhasta" oli tullut Pax Americana.
ellauri386.html on line 101: Miltopaeus julkaisi laajan puhetaidon oppaan Institutiones oratoriae sekä latinan kielen kieliopin Synopsis grammaticae latinae. Häntä pidettiin taitavana ja valistuneena opettajana, joskin hänen aikalaisensa teologian professori Petrus Bång oli kiivaasti eri mieltä Miltopaeuksen kanssa ja varoitti ylioppilaita hänen "viettelevästä filosofiastaan ja turhista jaarituksistaan."
ellauri395.html on line 518: ”Kuurot ja kuulevat voivat tehdä yhdessä podcasteja”. Sokeat saavat näkönsä ja rammat kävelevät, spitaaliset puhdistuvat ja kuurot kuulevat, kuolleet herätetään henkiin ja köyhille julistetaan ilosanoma.
ellauri395.html on line 523: Ja rammat kävelemään
ellauri395.html on line 527: Ja rammat kävelemään.
ellauri412.html on line 676: Look, if you’re reading the Bible as an atheist and asking about a reasonable interpretation, then the world is your oyster. You are not required to accept the worldview of the authors of the Bible, who all believed in God and wrote about Him from that perspective. And at the same time, as someone who does not believe God exists and does not accept the inspired nature or inerrancy of scripture, you have limited your possible interpretations of Scripture to only natural explanations that do not invoke God. This is going to cause significant problems with your use of the historical-grammatical method, which strives to discover the biblical author’s original intended meaning in the text. For example, every time Isaiah writes, “thus says the Lord” (which is a lot!), how will you interpret that? For an atheist, a statement like that either makes Isiah delusional (he believed a non-existent God told him something) or a charlatan (he’s knowingly asserting a false attribution).
xxx/ellauri068.html on line 59: Vsesojuznyj on kirjoitettu väärin s.458. Ärsyttävää puolisivistyneisyyttä. Tässä jaxossa on typerää hauskanpitoa vähäosaisempien kustannuxella ja neuvostohistorian vääristelyä. Aitoamerikkalaista koloniaali"huumoria". Food fight tästä enää puuttuisi. Rypälemarenkitortun paiskaaminen Stalinin naamaan. Kyttyräselät, spitaaliset, hebefreenikot (Saku oli sellainen) ja kaikenlaiset rammat ovat putkahtaneet loukoistaan kazelemaan tätä hupia. Taas tätä amerikkalaista arabi"terroristi"pelkoa sekottuneena vanhempaan ryssä"kommunisti"pelkoon ja saku"nazi"pelkoon.. Vizi ne pelkää kaikkia jotka vähänkin uhkaa niiden öljyhegemoniaa keski-Aasiassa. Kaikki Nobelien näiltä kentiltä saadut öljyrahat on käytetty Nobel-palkintoihin. Donald Trump vihjaa kohta vastaanottavansa fysiikan Nobel-palkinnon.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 979: Joh. 5:14 Jeesus kai uskoo, että rammat ovat rampoja siksi, että Jumala on rangaissut heitä synnistä. Hän sanoo rammalle miehelle parannettuaan hänet: ”älä tee enempää syntiä, tai sinulle koituu enemmän pahaa”.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 363: ShekinAH (AH as in "Glory"), the "AH" aspect of YahuAH (Hebrew: שכינה) is the English spelling of a grammatically feminine Hebrew word that means the dwelling or settling, and is used to denote the dwelling or settling of the divine presence of Yahuah.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 421: The Tosafot do not constitute a continuous commentary, but rather (like the "Dissensiones" to the Roman Code of the first quarter of the twelfth century) deal only with difficult passages of the Talmud. Single sentences are explained by quotations which are taken from other Talmudic treatises and which seem at first glance to have no connection with the sentences in question. On the other hand, sentences which seem to be related and interdependent are separated and embodied in different treatises. The Tosafot can be understood only by those who are well advanced in the study of the Talmud, for the most entangled discussions are treated as though they were simple. Glosses explaining the meaning of a word or containing a grammatical observation are very rare.
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 205: Toka PAOLO E FRANCESCA - Film (1971) - Coming Soon - è un film di genere drammatico del 1971, diretto da Gianni Vernuccio, con Luigi Pierdominici e Nico Balducci. perustuu vielä löyhemmin Danten versioon. Durata 97 minuti. Ei siis tulla kovin soon, ei ainakaan niin äkkiä kuin kerskui Donald Davidson.
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 109: Snorrin mielestä niissä mentiin liian pitkälle. Snorri draws the line at mixed metaphor, which he terms nykrat "nykrätty, made monstrous" (Snorri Sturluson: Háttatal 6), and his nephew called the practice löstr "a fault" (Óláfr hvítaskáld: Third Grammatical Treatise 80). In spite of this, it seems that "many poets did not object to and some must have preferred baroque juxtapositions of unlike kennings and neutral or incongruous verbs in their verses" (Foote & Wilson (1970), p. 332). E.g. heyr jarl Kvasis dreyra "listen, earl, to Kvasir's blood (=poetry)" (Einarr skálaglamm: Vellekla 1). Niin aina.
xxx/ellauri416.html on line 606: tetragrammaton JHWH ja kuusi muuta nimeä, jotka ovat El (”Jumala”), Eloah (”Jumala”), Elohim (”Jumalat”), Shaddai (”Kaikkivaltias”), Ehje (”minä olen”) ja Tsevaot (”sotajoukot”). Muita nimiä pidetään pelkkinä epiteetteinä tai nimityksinä, jotka heijastavat erilaisia Jumalan piirteitä, mutta usein ollaan vielä halakhan vaatimuksiakin varovaisempia, ja esimerkiksi saatetaan kirjoittaa ”J-la” sanan ”Jumala” sijasta myös suomen kielellä, tai heprealainen luku 15 ilmaistaan sanomalla tet – vav (kirjaimellisesti ”9-6”) jod – he:n sijasta (kirjaimellisesti ”10-5”, hepreaksi myös yksi Jumalan nimistä eli ”Jah”). Jah jah de ä Gösta här.
xxx/ellauri416.html on line 722: El means "God" in the Ugaritic and the Canaanite languages. The literal meaning of Shaddai, however, is the subject of debate. Some scholars have argued that it came from Akkadian shadû ("mountain") or from the Hebrew verb shaddad שדד meaning "Destroyer". Shaddai may have also come from shad שד meaning mammary; shaddai is a typical Biblical Hebrew word (שדי). The plural (Shaddayim -- שדיים) is the typical Modern Hebrew word for human breasts in dual grammatical number.The Deir Alla Inscription contains shaddayin as well as elohin rather than elohim. Scholars translate this as "shadday-gods," taken to mean unspecified boobs, mountain or destroyer gods. A popular interpretation of the name Shaddai is that it is composed of the Hebrew relative particle she- (Shin plus vowel segol followed by dagesh), or, as in this case, as sha- (Shin plus vowel patach followed by a dagesh). The noun containing the dagesh is the Hebrew word dai meaning "enough, sufficient, sufficiency". However, Day's overview says a "rabbinic view understanding the name meaning 'who suffices' (Se + day) is clearly fanciful and has no support."
44