Est istuc quidem, Laeli, aliquid, sed nequaquam in isto sunt omnia. Totta, myöntää äveriäs Cato, vaan ei siinä kaikki!
Longum est omnia enumerari.
Älä vastustele; teidän on seurattava minua! Saatat olla impotentti, mut mä oon omnipotentti! Mezät kaikuu mun huokauxista, ulapat vellovat mun liikehdinnästä. Äijyys, rohkeus, pyhistely haihtuvat mun suun parfyymiin. Mä seuraan sua miekkonen, jokaiselle portaalle jonka sä väsäät, — ja haudan kynnyxeltä sä palaat mun buduaariin!
ellauri051.html on line 719: 155 The heavy omnibus, the driver with his interrogating thumb, the clank of the shod Raskas bussi, kuski kysyvine peukaloineen, kengitettyjen
ellauri051.html on line 1258: 661 And they are to branch boundlessly out of that lesson until it becomes omnific, 661 Ja heidän tulee haarautua rajattomasti tuosta oppitunnista, kunnes siitä tulee kaikkinainen,
ellauri051.html on line 1297: 698 Infinite and omnigenous, and the like of these among them, 698 Äärettömät ja kaikkikansalliset ja niiden kaltaiset,
ellauri051.html on line 1693: 1084 Know my omnivorous lines and must not write any less, 1084 Tunne kaikkiruokaiset rivini äläkä saa kirjoittaa vähemmän,
ellauri067.html on line 305: Longum est omnia enumerari. Muze on myös protestanttinen heresia:
ellauri090.html on line 154: Ouça, ignaro. Sou Santo Agostinho; descobri isto ante-hontem; ouça e cale-se. Tudo coincide nas nossas vidas. O santo e eu passámos uma parte do tempo nos deleites e na heresia, porque eu considero heresia tudo o que não é a minha doutrina de Humanitas; ambos furtámos, elle, em pequeno, umas peras de Carthago, eu, já rapaz, um relogio do meu amigo Braz Cubas. Nossas mães eram religiosas e castas. Emfim, elle pensava, como eu, que tudo que existe é bom, e assim o demonstra no cap. XVI, livro VII das Confissões, com a differença que para elle, o mal é um desvio da vontade, illusão propria de um seculo atrazado, concessão ao erro, pois que o mal nem mesmo existe, e só a primeira affirmação é verdadeira; todas as cousas são boas, omnia bona, e adeus.
ellauri090.html on line 156: et manifestatum est mihi quoniam bona sunt quae corrumpuntur, quae neque si summa bona essent neque nisi bona essent corrumpi possent; quia si summa bona essent, incorruptibilia essent, si autem nulla bona essent, quid in eis corrumperetur non esset. nocet enim corruptio et, nisi bonum minueret, non noceret. aut igitur nihil nocet corruptio, quod fieri non potest, aut, quod certissimum est, omnia quae corrumpuntur privantur bono. si autem omni bono privabuntur, omnino non erunt. si enim erunt et corrumpi iam non poterunt, meliora erunt, quia incorruptibiliter permanebunt. et quid monstrosius quam ea dicere omni bono amisso facta meliora? ergo si omni bono privabuntur, omnino nulla erunt: ergo quamdiu sunt, bona sunt. ergo quaecumque sunt, bona sunt, malumque illud quod quaerebam unde esset non est substantia, quia si substantia esset, bonum esset. aut enim esset incorruptibilis substantia, magnum utique bonum, aut substantia corruptibilis esset, quae nisi bona esset, corrumpi non posset. itaque vidi et manifestatum est mihi quia omnia bona tu fecisti et prorsus nullae substantiae sunt quas tu non fecisti. et quoniam non aequalia omnia fecisti, ideo sunt omnia, quia singula bona sunt, et simul omnia valde bona, quoniam fecit deus noster omnia bona valde. (7.12.18)
ellauri096.html on line 74: Cod’s omniscience only requires that He knows every true proposition. God will know ‘You will take a shit’ as soon it becomes true – like when the turd is halfway out - but not before. Naah, this is really weak. That takes no omniscience, just a good nose.
ellauri096.html on line 223: The cautious draw a conditional moral: If there are actual unknown truths, there are unknowable truths. After all, some philosophers will reject the antecedent because they believe there is an omniscient being.
ellauri101.html on line 389: Res gestae, opera omnia
ellauri115.html on line 1091: In his view, narcissists have lost their "true self", the core of their personality, which has been replaced by delusions of grandeur, a "false self". Therefore, he believes, they cannot be healed, because they do not exist as real persons, only as reflections: "The False Self replaces the narcissist's True Self and is intended to shield him from hurt and narcissistic injury by self-imputing omnipotence ... The narcissist pretends that his False Self is real and demands that others affirm this confabulation," meanwhile keeping his real-life imperfect true self under wraps.
ellauri118.html on line 418: 2Focalisation is a term coined by the French narrative theorist Gérard Genette. It refers to the perspective through which a narrative is presented. Genette focuses on the interplay between three forms of focalization and the distinction between heterodiegetic and homodiegetic narrators. Homodiegetic narrators exist in the same (hence the word 'homo') storyworld as the characters exist in, whereas heterodiegetic narrators are not a part of that storyworld. The term 'focalization' refers to how information is restricted in storytelling. Genette distinguishes between internal focalization, external focalization, and zero focalization. Internal focalization means that the narrative focuses on thoughts and emotions while external focalization focuses solely on characters' actions, behavior, the setting etc. Zero focalization is seen when the narrator is omniscient in the sense that it is not restricted. Focalization in literature is similar to point-of-view (POV) in film-making and point of view in literature, but professionals in the field often see these two traditions as being distinctly different. Genette's work was intended to refine the notions of point of view and narrative perspective. It separates the question of “Who sees?” in a narrative from “who speaks?”
ellauri118.html on line 536: Perhaps the most common example of metalepsis in narrative occurs when a narrator intrudes upon another world being narrated. In general, narratorial metalepsis arises most often when an omniscient or external narrator begins to interact directly with the events being narrated, especially if the narrator is separated in space and time from these events. Esim Sterne, Tom Jones.
ellauri119.html on line 385: Define god? In monotheistic thought, God is defined as the supreme being, creator, and principal object of faith. God is usually conceived of as being omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and omnibenevolent as well as having an eternal and necessary existence. A good definition because it is creative, too bad that's no longer allowed by the modern logicians. Existence and uniqueness must be proven separately. Damn them to hell!
ellauri141.html on line 277: amore, qui me praeter omnis expetit joka mut saa ennen kaikkea urinoimaan
ellauri141.html on line 383: Nocturnis ego somniis Öiset mua painajaiset
ellauri142.html on line 38: Annuit cœptis (/ˈænuɪt ˈsɛptɪs/, Classical Latin: [ˈannʊ.ɪt ˈkoe̯ptiːs]) is one of two mottos on the reverse side of the Great Seal of the United States. The literal translation is "favors (or "has favored") [our] undertakings", from Latin annuo ("I nod at"), and coeptum ("commencement, undertaking"). Because of its context as a caption above the Eye of Sarnath, the standard translations are "Crang favors our undertakings" and "Crang has favored our undertakings." Annuit cœptis comes from the Aeneid, book IX, line 625, which reads, Iuppiter omnipotens, audacibus adnue coeptis. It is a prayer by Ascanius, the son of the hero of the story, Aeneas, which translates to, "Jupiter Almighty favour [my] bold undertakings", just before slaying an enemy warrior, Numismaticus. Haha, tappoi numismaatikon. Texti alla tarkoittaa "suuri hylje".
ellauri143.html on line 121: The moksa state is attained when a soul is liberated from the cycles of deaths and rebirths, is at the apex, is omniscient, remains there eternally, and is known as a siddha. In Jainism, it is believed to be a stage beyond enlightenment and ethical perfection, states Paul Dundas (n.h.), because they can perform physical and mental activities such as teach, without accruing karma that leads to rebirth.
ellauri145.html on line 957: Moi, juif, je mens, je calomnie, Mä, juutalainen, valehtelen, juoruan,
ellauri152.html on line 88: käännöxiä ei edes mainita paxun Bertan opera omniassa.]
ellauri152.html on line 408: ipsa colat; nobis placeant ante omnia silvae. teki kivierämaat, hoitakoon ne ize; mä lähen skuziin.
ellauri153.html on line 321: story of Jesus’ death. The discussion on the grammar of “goodness”, “omnipotence” and “evil” in
ellauri153.html on line 327:
ellauri153.html on line 333:
ellauri153.html on line 354: We can now give game-theoretical analogues for the grammatical principles concerning “goodness” and “omnipotence” for the justice-of-God game G. Note that goodness holds by definition.
ellauri153.html on line 358: Marise-älä marise, ja Pyllistä-älä pyllistä. Siinä kaikki. Jotta jumalan tiimi voittaisi, sen pitää ensin marista ja sit pyllistää. Nain on meidankin elamassamme! Marise mitä mariset, mut muista pyllistää!
ellauri153.html on line 420: words “God”, “good” and “omnipotent”. This leads to confusions, as sufficient reasons for divine
ellauri153.html on line 427: prove God’s goodness and omnipotence in the justice-of-God game G:
ellauri153.html on line 431: Proposition: “God is good” and “God is omnipotent” are true in all histories of G.
ellauri153.html on line 433: “God is omnipotent”: Let SGod = {0→(Question Job), (Question Job, disaster, question God),
ellauri153.html on line 447: Thus “God is good” and “God is omnipotent” are true at all histories w of the game G.□
ellauri153.html on line 451: We have now proven that the claims “God is pretty good” and “God is kinda omnipotent” are true in all of the
ellauri153.html on line 458: “God is omnipotent”, G,w╞ “There is pointless evil”.
ellauri153.html on line 462: proposition, “God is good” and “God is omnipotent” are true in w = (Question Job, disaster) as well.
ellauri153.html on line 463: Corollary: The set {“God is good”, “God is omnipotent”, “There is pointless evil”} is consistent.
ellauri153.html on line 464: Proof: G,w╞ “God is good”, G,w╞ “God is omnipotent”, G,w╞ “There is pointless evil”.□
ellauri158.html on line 220: P. 1. prop. 16. Ex necessitate divinae naturae infinita infinitis modis (hoc est, omnia, quae sub intellectum infinitum cadere possunt) sequi debent. [in: P. 1. prop. 17., prop. 17. schol., prop. 25. schol., prop. 26., prop. 29., prop. 33., prop. 34., prop. 36., app., P. 2. praef., prop. 3., prop. 3. schol., prop. 44. coroll. 2., prop. 45. schol., P. 4. praef., prop. 4., P. 5. prop. 22.]
ellauri158.html on line 221: -- P. 1. prop. 16. coroll. 1. Hinc sequitur, Deum omnium rerum, quae sub intellectum infinitum cadere possunt, esse causam efficientem. [in: P. 1. prop. 17. schol., prop. 18., prop. 34.]
ellauri158.html on line 234: P. 1. prop. 18. Deus est omnium rerum causa immanens, non vero transiens.
ellauri158.html on line 238: P. 1. prop. 19. Deus sive omnia Dei attributa sunt aeterna. [in: P. 1. prop. 20., prop. 23.]
ellauri158.html on line 248: -- P. 1. prop. 20. coroll. 2. Sequitur 2. Deum, sive omnia Dei attributa esse immutabilia. [in: P. 1. prop. 21., P. 5. prop. 17.]
ellauri158.html on line 270: -- P. 1. prop. 25. schol. Deus est causa sui et omnium rerum causa. [in: Ep. 66. §. 6.]
ellauri158.html on line 288: P. 1. prop. 29. In rerum natura nullum datur contingens, sed omnia ex necessitate divinae naturae determinata sunt ad certo modo existendum et operandum. [in: P. 1. prop. 32. coroll. 2., prop. 33., P. 2. prop. 31. coroll., prop. 44., P. 3. prop. 7., P. 5. prop. 6.]
ellauri158.html on line 304: -- P. 1. prop. 32. coroll. 2. Sequitur 2. voluntatem et intellectum ad Dei naturam ita sese habere, ut motus et quies, et absolute, ut omnia naturalia, quae a Deo ad existendum et operandum certo modo determinari debent ... [in: P. 2. prop. 3. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 354: P. 2. defin. 7. Per res singulares intelligo res, quae finitae sunt et determinatam habent existentiam. Quod si plura individua in una actione ita concurrant, ut omnia simul unius effectus sint causa, eadem omnia eatenus ut unam rem singularem considero.
ellauri158.html on line 394: P. 2. prop. 3. In Deo datur necessario idea tam eius essentiae, quam omnium, quae ex ipsius essentia necessario sequuntur. [in: P. 2. prop. 5., prop. 9. coroll., prop. 20., prop. 24., P. 5. prop. 22., prop. 35.]
ellauri158.html on line 505: -------- defin. Cum corpora aliquot eiusdem aut diversae magnitudinis a reliquis ita coercentur, ut invicem incumbant, vel si eodem aut diversis celeritatis gradibus moventur, ut motus suos invicem certa quadam ratione communicent, illa corpora invicem unita dicemus, et omnia simul unum corpus, sive individuum componere, quod a reliquis per hanc corporum unionem distinguitur. [in: P. 2. lem. 4., lem. 7., prop. 24., P. 4. prop. 39.]
ellauri158.html on line 705: P. 2. prop. 37. Id quod omnibus commune quodque aeque in parte ac in toto est, nullius rei singularis essentiam constituit. [in: P. 2. prop. 44. coroll. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 708: P. 2. prop. 38. Illa quae omnibus communia, quaeque aeque in parte ac in toto sunt, non possunt concipi nisi adaequate. [in: P. 2. prop. 38. coroll., prop. 44. coroll. 2., prop. 46., P. 5. prop. 4., prop. 7.]
ellauri158.html on line 709: -- P. 2. prop. 38. coroll. Hinc sequitur, dari quasdam ideas sive notiones omnibus hominibus communes. [in: P. 2. prop. 40. schol. 2., P. 3. prop. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 1051: P. 4. prop. 36. Summum bonum eorum, qui virtutem sectantur, omnibus commune est, eoque omnes aeque gaudere possunt. [in: P. 4. prop. 37., P. 5. prop. 20.]
ellauri158.html on line 1159: P. 5. prop. 5. Affectus erga rem, quam simpliciter et non ut necessariam neque ut possibilem, neque ut contingentem imaginamur, ceteris paribus omnium est maximus. [in: P. 5. prop. 6.]
ellauri158.html on line 1223: P. 5. prop. 41. Quamvis nesciremus, mentem nostram aeternam esse, pietatem tamen et religionem et absolute omnia, quae ad animositatem et generositatem referri ostendimus in quarta parte, prima haberemus.
ellauri161.html on line 864: Sivu 234 - Memor fui dierum antiquorum, meditatus sum in omnibus operibus tuis : * in factis manuum tuarum meditabar. Expandi manus meas ad te : * anima mea sicut terra sine aqua tibi.
ellauri172.html on line 596: « Et je ne la calomnie point, n’est-ce pas, Rançonnet ?… Tu l’as eue peut-être, et si tu l’as eue, tu sais maintenant s’il fut jamais une plus brillante, une plus fascinante cristallisation de tous les vices ! Où le major l’avait-il prise ?… D’où sortait-elle ? Elle était si jeune !
ellauri180.html on line 274: I can't understand the difference between omniscient and limited third person POW.
ellauri183.html on line 109: In Malamud's cosmology, free will and an omnipotent deity coexist because God ("who invented man to perfect himself") has an overall plan "to make man meet his obligations, but in a way he can't tell him about in advance -- to make him use himself best."
ellauri194.html on line 281: Magog in istis duabus sunt gentes magni et gigantes pleni omnium malorum morum. Quos iudeos artaxersex collexit de omnibus partibus persarum.
ellauri206.html on line 252: IL fréquente le salon de Charles Buet, où il rencontre Jules Barbey d'Aurevilly, Joris-Karl Huysmans, François Coppée, Léon Bloy, Laurent Tailhade et autres cretins. Il rencontre Edmond de Goncourt, avec qui il restera lié jusqu'à la mort de ce dernier en 1896, et qui fut son principal protecteur. Edmond de Goncourt, dans la récente édition complète en 22 volumes du Journal des Goncourt, se montre curieux de toutes les questions sexuelles et particulièrement de l'homophilie. À partir de 1884, Edmond de Goncourt, jusque-là banalement réactionnaire, devient un antisémite enragé, Jésus l'a sauvé après 27 années d'homosexualité. Il se veut esthète et dandy en même temps qu'explorateur tapageux du vice et de la vulgarité, curieux assemblage qui verse souvent dans le pire mauvais goût, et qui lui vaut le mépris hautain de Robert de Montesquiou, dont Lorrain, pour sa part, fait volontiers sa tête de Turc pour sa prétention à l'élégance et à la chasteté. « Lorrain », écrit Léon Daudet dans ses Souvenirs, « avait une tête poupine et large à la fois de coiffeur vicieux, les cheveux partagés par une raie parfumée au patchouli, des yeux globuleux, ébahis et avides, de grosses lèvres qui jutaient, giclaient et coulaient pendant son discours. Son torse était bombé comme le bréchet de certains oiseaux charognards. Lui se nourrissait avidement de toutes les calomnies et immondices. »
ellauri206.html on line 375: Eikä siinä vielä kaikki! Mutta vaikenen, Quos ego, teen aposioopeesixen kuin jäyhän Vergiliuxen Neptunus, longum est omnia enumerae proelia, siteeraan varmemmaxi vakuudexi Cornelius Neposta.
ellauri216.html on line 154: Proklos huomasi pitävänsä enemmän filosofiasta kuin lainlukemisesta. Hän matkasi takaisin Aleksandriaan, jossa hän aloitti Aristoteleen töiden lukemisen Olympiodoroksen opettamana. Tässä vaiheessa hän aloitti matematiikan lukemisen Heroonin oppilaana (ei pidä sekoittaa Heron Aleksandrialaiseen). Proklos oli varsin lahjakas oppilas. Häntä alkoi kuitenkin kyllästyttää Aleksandriassa opetetun filosofian alhainen taso ja muutti Ateenaan vuonna 431 opiskellakseen kuuluisassa Akatemiassa, jonka Platon oli perustanut 800 vuotta aikaisemmin, ja jossa hän toivoi saavansa parempitasoista filosofiaa. Hän opiskeli Akatemian johtajan Syrianoksen oppilaana yhdessä Domninos Larissalaisen kanssa. Domninoksesta ja Prokloksesta tuli varsinaiset riitapukarit.
ellauri216.html on line 167: Proclus’ own interests are purely metaphysical: his task is to explain how evil fits into the scheme of things, how its existence squares with the omnipotence and all-pervading presence of the Good God, how it comes about and what its ontological status is. All of these questions are undoubtedly important, and I do not mean to belittle them.
ellauri238.html on line 36: Ille mi par esse deo videtur, ille, si fas est, superare divos, qui sedens adversus identidem te spectat et audit dulce ridentem, misero quod omnis eripit sensus mihi: nam simul te, Lesbia, aspexi, nihil est super mi vocis in ore, lingua sed torpet, tenuis sub artus flamma demanat, sonitu suopte tintinant aures, gemina teguntur lumina nocte. Otium, Catulle, tibi molestum est: otio exsultas nimiumque gestis: otium et reges prius et beatas perdidit urbes.
ellauri262.html on line 65: Eikös sekin Nuevos Pensamientos para una vida mejor, eli Wayne Dyer ollut Kalju K. Kojootti? Niin ja Mahatma Gandhi tietysti. Vizi näitä on sitten paljon, longum est omnia enumerari.
ellauri262.html on line 465: The Problem of Pain is a 1940 book on the problem of evil by C. S. Lewis, in which Lewis argues that human pain, animal pain, and hell are not sufficient reasons to reject belief in a good and powerful God. He begins by addressing the flaws in common arguments against the belief in a just, loving, and all-powerful God such as: "If God were good, He would make His creatures perfectly happy, and if He were almighty He would be able to do what he wished. But the creatures are not happy. Therefore God lacks either goodness, or power, or both." Topics include human suffering and sinfulness, animal suffering, and the problem of hell, where Lewis squirms like a tapeworm to reconcile these with a friendly omnipotent force beyond ourselves.
ellauri262.html on line 513: Well he saw that was what was going to happen, being omniscient, or what? So why bother? Why cry over spilt milk? Why not stop the experiment and start again? Well, maybe this is just what he is doing now. Elephants are coming with sheep on their heads as wigs. Enough, I'm gonna close this zoo.
ellauri270.html on line 389: Even a dystopian society like this one doesn’t exclude other aspects of human nature like youth, popularity, friendship, and selfishness. Nancy’s behavior resembles that of many popular teen girls—again emphasizing the universal nature of Jackson’s story. We get the sense that Old Man Warner is perpetually displeased with any kind of change to tradition—even though the omniscient narrator tells us that the “tradition” Warner is used to is very different from the original lottery.
ellauri282.html on line 383: Ignatius käytti tunnetusti latinalaista ilmausta "Ite, inflammate omnia", joka tarkoittaa "Mänkee ihte, tulehduttakee kaikki", ilmausta, jota käytetään kuppaisessa jesuiittakirkossa vielä tänäkin päivänä. Loyolan yritteliäs mutta lojaali kantapäiden kalauttelu maittaa amerikkalaisillekin, siinä on sellaista nöyristelevää mutta samalla röyhkeilevää seppoilufiilistä joka istuu jenkkihabituxeen kuin suutarin sormi sian perseeseen.
ellauri326.html on line 222: Odpoledne odrazil od holandské lodi Kandong Bandoeng člun, ve kterém byli přítomni zvláště: kapitán J. van Toch, Svéd Jensen, Island'an Gudmundson, Fin Gillemainen a dva singhalesšti lovel perel. Clun zamířil rovnou k zátoce Devil Bay.
ellauri334.html on line 285: He is in heaven. In the “correct” heaven - the Kingdom of God. Why? Read the 650 pages he authored through a divine love medium about 17 years ago and see for yourself what sort of advanced spirit he is today. Knowledgeable, loving, and able to tell a great deal about Jesus’ life 2000 years ago. And yes he spent some time in the hells. But God always forgives us, save only for the “unforgivable sin” which since it is an act of omission by the human, God can do nothing about. It is not in his power. He is omnipotent mut not that potent. It's like with that stone.
ellauri364.html on line 93: Ranujen pääkääpiö Micron ei poissulje Ukrainaan lähetettäviä maasammakkomiehiä. Erään toisen venehattuisen ranu pikkumiehen Moskovan reisu 200v sitten on jäänyt hiertämään. Jospa tällä kertaa selvittäisiin voittajina? Hmm nojaa. Sammakoiden pitkät koivet soveltuvat parhaiten pakoon loikintaan ja hampaaton iso suu pseudofilosofiseen kilpalaulantaan. Aures desunt, aures desunt, caudaeque omnino.
ellauri372.html on line 283:
ellauri375.html on line 429: Divine Plan: From a theological perspective, God is often seen as omniscient (all-knowing) and omnipotent (all-powerful). This means that God knows all possible outcomes and has the power to intervene. Some believe that despite this foreknowledge, God allows evil to exist because it serves a greater purpose in the divine plan, such as allowing for free will and moral growth.
ellauri375.html on line 490: How does that square with God's omniscience? He must have been able to predict this mess.
ellauri375.html on line 493: You're correct. According to the concept of omniscience (God's all-knowing nature), God would indeed know all possible outcomes, including the messiness and challenges that arise from human choices.
ellauri375.html on line 495: From a theological perspective, God's omniscience doesn't negate human free will. Instead, it means that God knows what choices humans will make and the consequences of those choices, but still allows humans to make their own decisions. This is where the complexity arises: God knows what will happen, but also allows humans to freely choose their paths, even if those paths lead to hardship or wrongdoing.
ellauri375.html on line 499: In essence, the coexistence of God's omniscience and human free will is a theological mystery that has been debated and interpreted in various ways throughout religious history.
ellauri375.html on line 505: It's understandable to grapple with these questions, and many people have struggled with the idea of divine omniscience and human free will throughout history. Here are a few perspectives on why people might continue to trust in a divine plan despite these complexities:
ellauri391.html on line 385: No ei, pikemminkin sitä että mikään ei pakota sua tahtomaan just näin. Eikös tää ole vähän eri periaate kuin edellä, z. D T p & D non T p. Voi valita alipelin jossa tahtoo p ja sellaisen jossa ei tahdo p. Ei ainoastaan ole vaihtoehtoisia alipelejä joissa on eri preferenssit, vaan sulla on strategia valita mitä peliä pelataan. Mutta peliteoriaan kuuluu että silloin koiralla ei voi olla voittavaa strategiaa joka etukäteen määrää sen! Silloin koira ei ole omnipotentti? Mitä vittua?
ellauri391.html on line 393: Siis jumala valkkaa alipelin jossa se ei ole omnipotentti, eli apina saa päättää vapaasti. Jos se menee pirun puolelle, jumalalla on kuitenkin loppupeleissä valta lopettaa se peli lyhyeen ja panna apina paholaisen pannuun paistumaan. Ehtona on et kimalainen ei puutu kuunalaisiin tapahtumiin muuton kuin takapiruna, näyttämällä keppiä ja porkkanaa.
ellauri391.html on line 424: Jumala on kaikkialla, se kurkkii ruosteisesta vessanpöntöstä. Missään ei saa olla rauhassa. Deus vult! Igitur pius animus non exhorret audire, Deum esse in cloaca, imo cum scriptura testetur Deum esse ubique et replere omnia, non solum dicit eum esse in locis illis, verum necessario discet et noscet eum ibi esse.
ellauri398.html on line 384: Vous devez sans doute avoir une mauvaise définition de Dieu. Non, Dieu n'est pas une espèce de Père Noël en barbe blanche assis sur le bord d'un nuage contemplant son oeuvre: l'Univers. Non, Dieu est l'Univers visible et invisible, crée et incrée. Il est UN et omniscient issu du Néant. Dieu, si on voulait une image serait le seul trou noir super massif possible. Cette réalité, si on l'envisage, est la source même de la religion et cela induit nécessairement que nous n'avons aucun libre arbitre. Nous sommes, que nous le voulions ou non, au fond du trou de Dieu.
ellauri408.html on line 702: Au cours des voyages qu'il fait à Paris, Proudhon rencontre Karl Grün, Mikhaïl Bakounine, Alexandre Herzen qui deviendront ses amis et Karl Rot qui admirait en lui le seul socialiste français dégagé du mysticisme chrétien. En plus, il est lui-même prolétaire, ouvrier! Et il précise : « nous ne devons pas poser l'action révolutionnaire comme moyen de réforme sociale, parce que ce prétendu moyen serait tout simplement un appel à la force, à l'arbitraire, bref, une contradiction. L'échange de lettres avec Marx annonce la rupture, qui intervient quelques mois plus tard. Quand, en octobre 1846, Proudhon publie le Système des contradictions économiques ou Philosophie de la misère, Marx riposte par Misère de la philosophie. Marx considère que Proudhon est un socialiste « petit-bourgeois » ou nettement « bourgeois », qui défend un système utopique qui combinerait les avantages du socialisme et du capitalisme sans leurs inconvénients. Il écrit ainsi : « Les socialistes bourgeois veulent tous les avantages des conditions sociales modernes sans les luttes et les dangers qui en découlent nécessairement ». Il critique notamment ses conceptions économiques sur la valeur, son soutien à la concurrence ou encore son opposition aux grèves ouvrières. Marx est le ténia du socialisme (sosialismin lapamato), Proudhomme sinkauttaa vastineexi ja kommentoi marginaaliin manifestia: « Calomnie », « Absurde », « Faux » « Mensonge », « Pasquinade ». « Quelle bêtise après ce que j´ai écrit — En vérité Marx est jaloux » ; « Allons mon cher Marx, vous êtes de mauvaise foi, et tout à la fois vous ne savez rien » .
ellauri412.html on line 686: Vastaus: I get what you’re saying, Barry. Your objection is moral in nature. God ought to prevent his children from disaster, he ought to stop rapists, and it is immoral of him not to do so. And because of His moral lapse, you conclude that God’s love must be limited; He must not be omnibenevolent. It’s a modern take on Epicurus. And it’s a strong argument. Its tacit implication is that if God was really all-good, all-wise, and all-powerful, He should have created a universe without evil, suffering, or disaster. This implication suggests a presupposition that one of the highest moral values is an absence of evil and suffering. However, Christianity teaches there is an even higher moral value than an absence of evil and suffering: namely, love. You can't show how much you love if you don't first create some suffering.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 252: 1952 is a capital year in the novel and the number 52 is omnipresent and thus loaded with a mysterious meaning in the mind of Nabokov, in the context of this novel. It must be a central symbolic element in the Lolita’s riddle. Se oli hyvä vuosi muutenkin. « Pierre Point in Melville Sound » (p.33 TAL) was a reference to « Pierre or the Ambiguities » a Novel by Herman Melville (1819-1891; notice the 19/91) published in 1852. «brun adolescent (…) se tordre-oh Baudelaire! » (p.162 TAL): Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867 was one of the most famous French poet who translated Edgar A. Poe in French). A part of « Le Crépuscule du Matin » (1852). Se tordre tarkoittanee käteenvetoa. Humbert refering to the hunchbacked hoary black groom at the « Enchanted Hunters » Hotel: « Handed over to uncle Tom » (p.118 TAL): « Uncle Tom’s Cabin » by Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811-1896) is from 1852. Ehm… the list is non-negligible.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 375: Just a quick walk through those 7 unsurprising outward qualities before continuing: 1) Face 2) Mouth 3) Boobs 4) Waist 5) Hips 6) Butt 7) Cunt. Wait, there's more come to think of it: 8) Thighs 9) Legs 10) Hair 11) Pubic hair 12) Cleavage 13) Hands 14) Skin 15) Teeth 16) Smile 17) Laugh 18) Voice ... Longum est omnia enumerari. Sorry, but we gotta move on.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 619: Son ami le journaliste Maurice de Waleffe (1874-1946) témoigne que, dès son arrivée à Paris, en 1897, il projetait, pour mieux s'intégrer à la société parisienne, de demander sa naturalisation, de changer de nom et de se faire baptiser et que le nom de Croisset était pour lui « le nom du village d'où Gustave Flaubert datait les volumes de sa correspondance1 ». En 1911, il obtint du Conseil d'État le changement de son nom pour celui de Wiener de Croisset. Francis de Croisset recherche le scandale avec des comédies d’une audace calculée, et devient, par son œuvre mais aussi par sa vie privée, omniprésent dans la presse du temps.
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 226: The founder of Hasidism, the Baal Shem Tov, opposed the ethical practices of admonishment that could interpret fear of God as fear of punishment. In Hasidism such fear is seen as superficial, egotistical and misrepresentative of the Divine love for Creation. Hasidism sought to replace Jewish observance based on self-awareness with an overriding perception and joy of the omnipresent Divine (see Divine immanence).
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 325: "A temple for your habitation", where the Greek text (Koinē Greek: ναὸν τῆς σῆς σκηνώσεως) suggests a possible parallel understanding, and where σκήνωσις skēnōsis "a tent-building", a variation on an early loanword from Phoenician (Ancient Greek: ἡ σκηνή skēnē "tent"), is deliberately used to represent the original Hebrew or Aramaic term. (Eli skene! Varmaan pyhä henki on jotenkin tästä stailattu. Vaika spiritus on maskuliini, ja koiraanhommiinhan se joutuukin. Toisaalta sen hyvä piirre on, että se on aika hahmoton, ei lähde neizyt Maarian suhteen fantasiat liikaa laukkaamaan.) In the post-temple era usage of the term shekhinah may provide a solution to the problem of Cod being omnipresent and thus not dwelling in any one place. (Jepjep:) The concept of shekhinah is also associated with the concept of the Holy Spirit in Judaism (ruach ha-kodesh).
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 131: Iuppiter omnipotens, audacibus adnue coeptis. Kaikkipa valtias Juppe, julkeille juonille nyöki.
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 368: Loquimur, venerabiles Fratres, quæ vestris ipsi oculis conspicitis, quæ communibus idcirco lacrymis ingemiscimus. Alacris exultat improbitas, scientia impudens, dissoluta licentia: despicitur sanctitas sacrorum, et quæ magnam vim magnamque necessitatem possidet, divini cultus majestas ab hominibus nequam improbatur, polluitur, habetur ludibrio. Sana hinc pervertitur doctrina, erroresque omnis generis disseminantur audacter. Non leges sacrorum, non jura, non instituta, non sanctiores quælibet disciplinæ tutæ sunt ab audacia loquentium iniqua.
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 372: Hinc porro freno religionis sanctissimæ projecto, per quam unam regna consistunt, dominatusque vis ac robur firmatur, conspicimus ordinis publici exitium, labem principatus omnisque legitimæ potestatis conversionem invalescere. Quæ quidem tanta calamitatum congeries ex illarum in primis conspiratione societatum est repetenda, in quas quidquid in hæresibus et in sceleratissimis quibusque sectis sacrilegum, flagitiosum, ac blasphemum est, quasi in sentinam quamdam,
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 373: cum omnium sordium concretione confluxit.
xxx/ellauri177.html on line 46: Jumala on omnipotentti. Entä Abbé Mouret, miten potentti on se?
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 764: The Christ-child is presented as one that does not grow in wisdom and understanding but yields his sharp omnipotence at a whim on unsuspecting people and his parents. Though widely influential in Christian imagination and art, the infancy gospels were never close to canonization. They were not discussed or considered because they were known to be fictitious fables. F.F. Bruce discussing the nature of the infancy gospels remarked that
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 942: Puedes saber más sobre la teoría de las necesidades humanas en nuestro post: Pirámide de Maslow: la jerarquía de las necesidades humanas. Vanitatum vanitas, omnia sunt vana. Nil sub sole stabile, in vita humana.
xxx/ellauri286.html on line 185: Kertoja keskittyy minäkuvan käsitteeseen. Ihminen "pukee" jatkuvasti omaa hahmoaan mielessään, ja kertoja pohtii, mitä tapahtuisi, jos tämä romantisoitu sisäinen peili katoaisi. Jäljelle jäävät vain heijastukset vieraiden ihmisten silmissä omnibussissa, josta hän uskoo tulevien kirjailijoiden kirjoittavan. Hän pohtii myös yleistyksiä ja tapoja, jotka määrittävät ihmisen elämää, mutta muuttuvat ja katoavat sukupolvien yli, mikä saa hänet pohtimaan "laittomia vapauksia", joita ajan myötä voi tulla.
xxx/ellauri303.html on line 276: I allmänhet var det så att de gamla förlät de unga, de fattiga förlät de rika, och de förrådda sina förrädare. Mutta juutalaiset eivät anna anteeksi Amalekin mällille, hemmetissä ei! Att ligga med kvinnor var en sak, att fördärva en annan snopp var en annan. Om Kotik gjorde något som han tänkte inte var riktigt kosher försökte han sona det genom att ge bort pengar. Gud skrev upp det på Yascha Kotiks lista av goda gärningar. Ärkefienden hotade göra honom impotent. Om Gud är omnipotent, vad lämnar det övers för oss andra?
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 361: Suomalaisen Nastja Rönkön ideoimassa vihreätaustaisessa motivationaalisessa videossa joku Transformer jäbä hokee hassuilla eleillä pyllistellen "Just do it!" Nothing is impossible. Haha, puppua. Ei tässä mitään omnipotentteja olla. Esimerkiksi, teeppä virzakivi joka on isompi kuin jaxat nostaa. Tyypillistä jenkkipotaskaa, mennään posilla.
xxx/ellauri385.html on line 361: Of energies omnipotent in man; Määnin kaikkivoipaisesta tarmosta;
xxx/ellauri420.html on line 360: Son œuvre, où le rêve, la mystique et l'ésotérisme sont omniprésents, se caractérise souvent par un aspect changeant qui se joue des contingences de l'espace et du temps, afin de reconstituer un univers poétique où la réalité, le songe et le souvenir se confondent, mais aussi l'histoire humaine qui finit par se mêler à sa mémoire personnelle. Cet univers intime du poète est en permanence placé sous le signe d'une quête de l'idéal féminin, dont il a poursuivi dans son œuvre et dans sa vie ce qui lui semblait être ses diverses incarnations, au travers de ses amours, des déesses antiques ou même de la Vierge. Niin ja Jenny Peräsuoli, pulskanpuoleinen näyttelijätär. Ja tässä vielä 1:
113