Europe — the land of high culture, high fashion, delicious food and centuries-spanning history. What’s not to love?

xxx/ellauri091.html on line 484:

Well, we asked ourselves this question, and considering how many countries are in Europe, we decided there are plenty of things not to
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 488:

Armed with the attitude that, in fact, not all of Europe is so superior to the U.S., we set out to decide which countries
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 509: of New York City’s Central Park. And like the park, it manages to have a ton of ungodly-rich people living here, with 32 percent of the population made up of millionaires. Essentially inaccessible to anyone who’s not fabulously loaded.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 521:

Nothing noteworthy has ever happened in Liechtenstein. No American celebs went there ever. Not even George Constanza. Not even Meghan Markle.

xxx/ellauri091.html on line 525:

If you thought San Marino was a small Southern California city with luxe real estate where it’s always sunny, you were spot on. But there’s another San Marino, too: this European country landlocked by Italy that’s half the size of San Francisco.

xxx/ellauri091.html on line 556:

Slovenia is one of Europe’s greenest countries and that’s about it. There’s nothing particularly noteworthy about this warm Yugoslav republic except that it’s near cooler countries.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 640:

And what about those tiny sausages from Vienna? How could you not like those, you heathen!

xxx/ellauri091.html on line 668:

You must be doing something right when your country is known for its wooden shoes, mild cheeses, legal cannabis and insanely large flower industry. Bikes rule over cars. Dutch people are tall, racist and generally boring. The cities are organized and clean, but not over clean like Switzerland. The standard of living is as high for the whites and life as hard for the other shades as the tourists in Amsterdam’s red-light district.

xxx/ellauri091.html on line 669:

What’s not to love?

xxx/ellauri091.html on line 694:

When it comes to the essentials in life, no one does it better than the Danes. They might not have the museums of France, the cuisine of Italy, the beaches of Spain and Portugal, or the wine of Croatia, but the overall quality of life in this Scandinavian country is tops in the world.

xxx/ellauri091.html on line 780: All this was in the early 1890’s at a time when Europe was becoming increasingly conscious of the untold social problems bequeathed by the Industrial Revolution. But the dawn of enlightenment had not yet broken over America.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 782: Practical work alone, however, did not exhaust the aspirations that gripped Emily Balch. She felt the need both to acquire knowledge and to pass it on to others if she was to achieve more. And so she continued her studies, first in Paris under Levasseur1, the historian of the French working class, and later in Berlin where she studied that branch of economics which has been called a «professor-chair socialism»2. Here she also came in contact with the European labor movement and attended the Socialist Trade Union Congress in 1896.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 790: Emily Balch probably did not realize – and few did at that time – that 1914 was, more than 1939, the great turning point of our era. It marked the end of an epoch, and subsequent events have, in many ways, robbed people of their faith in the individual and in justice, which have been the heritage and the source of strength for the best in this world. Men have grown harder since then, more skeptical, and the doctrine that might is right has found its way increasingly into both internal and external policies, even after the end of this last war.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 792: Following the conference at The Hague, two delegations, one of them headed by Emily Balch, visited neutral and belligerent countries alike to submit their resolutions to the statesmen. A polite reception was accorded to them everywhere. This is not surprising, for the statesman is as a rule polite, perhaps especially so when dealing with women, but his true thoughts inevitably remain concealed behind his inscrutable smile. The women failed to make any headway with their proposals; and this was only to be expected with things as they were.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 794: With the coming of peace, the Women’s League arranged its second conference at Zurich in 1919 while the Allies were discussing the peace treaty in Paris. The conference thus had the opportunity of studying a draft of the peace treaty. Time does not permit me to review the resolutions which were passed as a result of this study. What I can and will say is that it would have been judicious to have heeded the women’s counsel.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 796: That few did so is sad, though hardly astonishing in view of the political climate of the time. Besides, the proposals had been put forward by women, and it is all too seldom that our male society lends a willing ear to the advice of women, no matter how well-founded it may be. It would not be a bad thing if men would occasionally remove their bland smiles and listen.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 798: Emily Balch has now reached old age but she remains active to the last, and, as she herself said when being congratulated on her seventy-fifth birthday: «I think I shall live for quite a while yet, for, as my grandfather said, an old woman is as tough as an old owl.» May her words prove to be no less than the truth, for the world cannot boast of many persons of her mettle.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 819: John Raleigh Mott is an American like Emily Greene Balch, with whom he shares this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. He was born in Sullivan County in the state of New York on May 25, 1865. It was assumed that he would follow in the footsteps of his father, a timber merchant engaged in transporting timber on the tributaries of the Delaware River. But he was an avid reader, and the town’s Methodist minister persuaded his parents to allow him to continue his studies. For a long time the boy did not know what he wanted to be. His father hoped that he would return to the timber trade, while he himself vacillated between the church, law, and politics. But during his years of study he was stirred by the Gospel of Christ to mankind, and when the Y.M.C.A. asked him to become a traveling secretary among the students of American and Canadian universities he interpreted the offer as a call from the Lord. He answered the call. It did not take him back to the Delaware River. It sent him out into the wide world and it has brought him here today.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 979: JK. Mun kanta on päinvastainen. Kynäilijöiden ns. oivalluxet ei ole koskaan tuoreita. Kaikki on sanottu sen tuhanteen kertaan, kuten oivalsi jo saarnaaja. Uudet apinat vaan yllättyvät huuli pyöreinä aina uudestaan niistä samoista. Kiintoisinta on nähdä mikä kunkin kulloinkin sai kaivamaan sanaisesta arkustaan just tän tai ton klisheisen rykäyxen. Mietin sitä kun luen uudestaan näitä paasauxia. Kiintoisinta siinä on miten se on ennustettavaa. Se saa mut aina vakuuttuneemmaxi siitä että tää kaikki on täysin determinististä, vaikkei fataalia. The situation is hopeless but not serious.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 91: Leena antautuu välillä vähän kerskumaan: "Hans Christian Andersen kirjoitti aikoinaan, että uuden vuosisadan runotar on lyhyt, selkeä ja rikas. Minä ainakin olen halunnut oppia kirjoittamaan lyhyesti, selkeästi ja rikkaasti. Kyse on vaikeasta ja kunnianhimoisesta yhdistelmästä, mutta siihen olen pyrkinyt, Leena Krohn toteaa. Sori vaan Leena mutta se uusi vuosisata oli noin kaxi vuosisataa sitten.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 151: Drivel was born Margaret Ann Shriver on May 18, 1957, in Gastonia, North Carolina, to a deeply religious family. Her father, Donald, is a Presbyterian minister, who became an academic and president of the Union Theological Seminary in New York; her mother, Peggy, was a homemaker who shook her moneymaker. She also has an older brother, Gregory, and a younger brother, Tim. At age 15, she changed her name from Margaret Ann to Lionel because she did not like the name she had been given, and as a tomboy (well, wannabe transsexual) felt a conventionally male name more appropriate.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 154: Drivel had written eight novels and published seven (one novel could not find a publisher) before writing We Need to Talk About Kevin, which she called her "make or break" novel due to the years of "professional disappointment" and "virtual obscurity" preceding it.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 160: I'm often asked did something happen around the time I wrote Kevin. Did I have some revelation or transsexual operation? The truth is that Kevin is of a piece with my other work. There's nothing special about Kevin. The other books are good too, go and buy them! It just tripped over an issue that was just ripe for exploration and by some miracle found its audience. School killings having come into vogue helped of course.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 168: In 2016 Shriver gave a controversial speech about cultural appropriation. Shriver had previously been criticized for her depiction of Latino and African-American characters in her book The Mandibles, which was described by one critic as racist and by another as politically misguided. In her Brisbane speech, Shriver contested these criticisms, saying writers ought to be entitled to write from any perspective, race, gender or background that they choose, even racist and politically misguided, in fact particularly so, because they sell best. The full text of her speech was published in the British newspaper The Guardian.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 170: In June 2018, she criticised an effort by the publisher Penguin Random House to diversify the authors that it published and better represent the population, saying that it prioritised diversity over quality and that a manuscript "written by a gay transgender Caribbean who dropped out of school at seven" would be published "whether or not said manuscript is an incoherent, tedious, meandering and insensible pile of mixed-paper recycling". Penguin Random House marketer and author Candice Carty-Williams criticised the statements. As a result of her comments Shriver was dropped from judging a competition for the magazine Mslexia.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 176: This is the full transcript of the keynote speech, Fiction and Identity Politics, Lionel Drrivel gave at the Brisbane Writers Festival on 8 September 2016. Her latest book The Mandibles, is published by Harper Collins.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 178: I hate to disappoint you folks, but unless we stretch the topic to breaking point this address will not be about “community and belonging.” In fact, you have to hand it to this festival’s organisers: inviting a renowned racist to speak about “community and belonging” is like expecting a tadpole to balance a beach ball on its nose.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 182: My thrust is that the socialist ideologies recently come into vogue challenge my right to write fiction at all. Meanwhile, the kind of fiction we are “allowed” to write is in danger of becoming so hedged, so circumscribed, so tippy-toe, that we’d indeed be better off not writing the anodyne drivel to begin with. At least I am, because drivel is all I do.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 188: Curiously, across my country (which? Is the turd talking about America? Most likely.) Mexican restaurants, often owned and run by Mexicans, are festooned with sombreros – if perhaps not for long. At the UK’s University of East Anglia, the student union has banned a Mexican restaurant from giving out sombreros, deemed once more an act of “cultural appropriation” that was also racist.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 192: The ultimate endpoint of keeping out mitts off experience that doesn’t belong to us is that there is no fiction left. Harry Potter would not exist, because we are all muddleheads. Or what was it, muggles?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 193: But what does this have to do with writing fiction? The moral of the sombrero scandals is clear: you’re not supposed to try on other people’s hats. Yet that’s what we’re paid to do, isn’t it? Step into other people’s shoes, and try on their hats. Try their underwear for size. Make fun of them when they don't say Calvin Klein, or have skidmarks on them.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 196: Yet were their authors honouring the new rules against helping yourself to what doesn’t belong to you, we would not have Malcolm Lowry’s Under the Volcano. We wouldn’t have most of Graham Greene’s novels, many of which are set in what for the author were foreign countries, and which therefore have Real Foreigners in them, who speak and act like foreigners, too. (Malcolm Lowry's book has been mentioned, it is pure drivel. Grandma Greene is another lousy driveler.)
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 198: In his masterwork English Passengers, Matthew Kneale would have restrained himself from including chapters written in an Aboriginal’s voice – though these are some of the richest, most compelling passages in that novel. If Dalton Trumbo had been scared off of describing being trapped in a body with no arms, legs, or face because he was not personally disabled – because he had not been through a World War I maiming himself and therefore had no right to “appropriate” the isolation of a paraplegic – we wouldn’t have the haunting 1938 classic, Johnny Got His Gun, unless he had written it with a pen in his arse. (Never heard of any of these masterpieces, but then I hadn't heard of Drivel or Kevin either until today.)
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 200: We wouldn’t have Maria McCann’s erotic masterpiece, As Meat Loves Salt – in which a straight woman writes about gay men in the English Civil War. Though the book is nonfiction, it’s worth noting that we also wouldn’t have 1961’s Black Like Me, for which John Howard Griffin committed the now unpardonable sin of “blackface.” Having his skin darkened – Michael Jackson in reverse – Griffin found out what it was like to live as a black man in the segregated American South. He’d be excoriated today, yet that book made a powerful social impact at the time.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 202: The author of Who Owns Culture? Appropriation and Authenticity in American Law, Susan Scafidi, a law professor at Fordham University who for the record is white, defines cultural appropriation as “taking intellectual property, traditional knowledge, cultural expressions, or artifacts from someone else’s culture without permission. This can include unauthorised use of another culture’s dance, dress, music, language, folklore, cuisine, traditional medicine, religious symbols, etc.”
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 203: What strikes me about that definition is that “without permission” bit. However are we fiction writers to seek “permission” to use a character from another race or culture, or to employ the vernacular of a group to which we don’t belong? Do we set up a stand on the corner and approach passers-by with a clipboard, getting signatures that grant limited rights to employ an Indonesian character in Chapter Twelve, the way political volunteers get a candidate on the ballot? Anyway, do you really expect us Americans to seek permission from any of those lower races? Did we do so when we appropriated their land and property?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 214: This same sensibility is coming to a bookstore near you. Because who is the appropriator par excellence, really? Who assumes other people’s voices, accents, patois, and distinctive idioms? Who literally puts words into the mouths of people different from themselves? Who dares to get inside the very heads of strangers, who has the chutzpah to project thoughts and feelings into the minds of others, who steals their very souls? Who is a professional kidnapper? Who swipes every sight, smell, sensation, or overheard conversation like a kid in a candy store, and sometimes take notes the better to purloin whole worlds? Who is the premier pickpocket of the arts? The fiction writer, that’s who. Yes, she is a real piece of shit more often than not. I know, I've been there.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 218: As for the culture police’s obsession with “authenticity,” fiction is inherently inauthentic. It’s fake. It’s self-confessedly fake; that is the nature of the form, which is about people who don’t exist and events that didn’t happen. The name of the game is not whether your novel honours reality; it’s all about what you can get away with. Well mine is anyway, I don't know about you. I try to get away with anything that is not nailed or welded fast.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 221: But in principle, I admire his courage – if only because he invited this kind of ethical forensics in a review out of San Francisco: “When a white male author writes as a young Nigerian girl, is it an act of empathy, or identity theft?” the reviewer asked. “When an author pretends to be someone he is not, he does it to tell a story outside of his own experiential range. But he has to in turn be careful that he is representing his characters, not using them for his plot.” Depends on who gets the money, I'd say. Chris Cleave hardly gave it all away to poor Nigerian gals.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 223: Hold it. OK, he’s necessarily “representing” his characters, by portraying them on the page. But of course he’s using them for his plot! How could he not? They are his characters, to be manipulated at his whim, to fulfill whatever purpose he cares to put them to.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 226: Of course he’s exploiting her. It’s his book, and he made her up. He owns her, she is her property. He is free to fuck her, rape her, do whatever he wants. The character is his creature, to be exploited up a storm. Yet the reviewer chides that “special care should be taken with a story that’s not implicitly yours to tell” and worries that “Cleave pushes his own boundaries maybe further than they were meant to go.”
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 243: For it can be dangerous these days to go the diversity route. Especially since there seems to be a consensus on the notion that San Francisco reviewer put forward that “special care should be taken with a story that’s not implicitly yours to tell.” Why on earth? Isn't it just the opposite? If it is somebody else's story you are free to do whatever you want, since you don't know it, so you can give free reins to your imagination! Chances are your all-white panel don't know the people either, so anything goes.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 248: Behold, the reviewer in the Washington Post, who groundlessly accused this book of being “racist” because it doesn’t toe a strict Democratic Party line in its political outlook, described the scene thus: “The Mandibles are white. Luella, the single African American in the family, arrives in Brooklyn incontinent and demented. She needs to be physically restrained. As their fortunes become ever more dire and the family assembles for a perilous trek through the streets of lawless New York, she’s held at the end of a leash. If The Mandibles is ever made into a film, my suggestion is that this image not be employed for the movie poster.” Your author, by implication, yearns to bring back slavery. Failing that, she does the best to poke fictive fun at a fictive member of the underprivileged race. Nobody laugh?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 250: Thus in the world of identity politics, fiction writers better be careful. If we do choose to import representatives of protected groups, special rules apply. If a character happens to be black, they have to be treated with kid gloves, and never be placed in scenes that, taken out of context, might seem disrespectful. But that’s no way to write. We know that most criminals are black anyway, and many if not most blacks are criminal. Writing to hide that fact would be writing fiction, and we fiction writers have your responsibility toward the white audience. The burden is too great, the self-examination paralysing. The natural result of that kind of criticism in the Post is that next time I don’t use any black characters, lest they do or say anything that is short of perfectly admirable and lovely. (No ei munkaan olis pitänyt alottaa tätä albumia, jossa haukutaan törkimyxiä jotka sattuu olemaan naisia. Äkkiä se kääntyyy naisten haukkumisexi sillä tekosyyllä, että ne sattuu olemaan törkimyxiä. Ehkä se onkin sitä!)
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 252: In fact, I’m reminded of a letter I received in relation to my seventh novel from an Armenian-American who objected – why did I have to make the narrator of We Need to Talk About Kevin Armenian? He didn’t like my narrator, and felt that her ethnicity disparaged his community. I took pains to explain that I knew something about Armenian heritage, because my best friend in the States was Armenian, and I also thought there was something dark and aggrieved in the culture of the Armenian diaspora that was atmospherically germane to that book. Besides, I despaired, everyone in the US has an ethnic background of some sort, and she had to be something! Joe Biden has finally admitted that the Armenian genocide was a genocide and not just an unusually bad case of flu. I am not convinced of it yet.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 254: Especially for writers from traditionally privileged demographics, the message seems to be that it’s a whole lot safer just to make all your characters from that same demographic, so you can be as hard on them as you care to be, and do with them what you like. Availing yourself of a diverse cast, you are not free; you have inadvertently invited a host of regulations upon your head, as if just having joined the EU. Use different races, ethnicities, and minority gender identities, and you are being watched.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 257:

I’m from a small rural community, and ev’rybody who lived in my neighborhood, if you want to call it that, were relatives. We called it “the circle,” and our house was there, my grandmother’s house was there, an aun’ an’ uncle who were childless lived there, and (uh) a couple of aunts an’ uncles who had children. There were five female cousins, an’ in the summertime we hung out together all day long from early until late. In my grandmother’s yard was a maple tree, and the five of us developed that into our apartment building. Each of us had a limb, and [small laugh] the less daring cousins took the lo’er limbs, and I and another cousin a year younger than I always went as far to the top as we could, an’ we– we were kinda derisive of those girls who stayed with the lower limbs. We had front doors an’ back doors. The front door was the — the limb — were the limbs on the front, that were nearest (um) the boxwood hedge. And the grass was all worn away in that area. An’ then the back doorwa–was on the back side of the tree, an’ you could only enter the front an’ exit from the rear. And that had to be done by swinging off a limb that was fairly high off the ground, and (um) my cousin Belinda and I had no problem with that, but the other girls — that was always somethin’ we had to coax them into doin’. But still, you entered the front, you left the rear. We (um) ate our lunches together. When it was lunchtime — an’ our mothers always cooked lunch in the summertime ’cause they didn’ want to be in the hot kitchen at night. So we would just take our (um) — go home, an’ we’d load our plates with all the vegetables an’ the cornbread, an’ get our glasses of milk or ice tea or whatever we were havin’, an’ we would head for somebody’s yard, where we would all sit down an’ eat together. It was just an institution: lunch in somebody’s yard. An’ if you wanted to go home for a second helping– sometimes that was quite a little walk, but it was worth it, because that was our thing, having lunch together, every day. (Um) We gathered at my grandmother’s on Sundays. All my aunts would get those chairs, form a circle. (Uh) One crocheted. (Uh) Most of them just sat an’ talked, an’ we girls hung out for the main part with the women. (Uh) The men would gather around the fish pond, which was in a side yard. It was (um) — it was kind of a rock (um) pond that my granddaddy had, had built. There was a ir’n pipe in the middle, an’ when he went fishin’, he would put his catch in there. Or he caught a mud turtle, he’d put it in there. An’ there it stayed until it was time to kill it an’ cook it, whatever it was. The pipe in the middle had water that sprayed up all the time. There was a locust tree near there, an’ that’s where we girls picked the leaves an’ the thorns to make the doll clothes out o’ the locust. It’s where we always ate the watermelon. We always had to save the rind, an’ we always had to leave some pink on that rind, because my grandmother made watermelon pickles out o’ that rind. I hated the things. I thought they were the worst things I ever put in my mouth. But ever’body else thought watermelon pickles were just a great delicacy. That was also around the time that ev’rybody grew gladiolias [sic] an’ I thought they were the ugliest flower I’d ever laid my eyes on, but ever’body had gladiolias. ‘Course now I’ve come to appreciate the gladiolia, but back then I had absolutely no appreciation for it. It was also where we made (uh) ice cream, (uh) on the front porch. We made ice cream on Sunday afternoons. I had an aunt who worked in the general mercantile business that my family owned, an’ she was only home on Sunday, so she baked all day: homemade rolls an’ cakes. And so, she made cakes an’ we made ice cream, an’ ever’body wan’ed to crank, of course. (Um) That was just a big treat, to get to crank that ice cream. It was jus’ our Sunday afternoon thing, an’ I, I think back on it. All the aunts would sit around an’ they’d talk, an’ they’d smoke. Even if you never saw those ladies smoke, any other time o’ the week. On Sunday afternoon when we all were gathered about in gran- in granny’s yard, they’d have a cigarette. Just a way of relaxing, I suppose. The maple tree’s now gone. In later years, it was thought the maple tree, our apartment building, was shading the house too much an’ causing mildew, so it was removed at some point. And I don’t, to this day, enjoy lookin’ (uh) into that part o’ the yard. …

xxx/ellauri103.html on line 260: In describing a second-generation Mexican American who’s married to one of my main characters in The Mandibles, I took care to write his dialogue in standard American English, to specify that he spoke without an accent, and to explain that he only dropped Spanish expressions tongue-in-cheek. I would certainly think twice – more than twice – about ever writing a whole novel, or even a goodly chunk of one, from the perspective of a character whose race is different from my own – because I may sell myself as an iconoclast, but I’m as anxious as the next person about attracting big money. But I think that’s a loss. I think that indicates a contraction of my fictional universe that is not good for the books, and not good for my purse.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 264: Now I proceed to the topic "The left’s embrace of gotcha hypersensitivity inevitably invites backlash." Why, it’s largely in order to keep from losing my fictional mojo that I stay off Facebook and Twitter, which could surely install an instinctive self-censorship out of fear of attack. Ten years ago, I gave the opening address of this same festival, in which I maintained that fiction writers have a vested interest in protecting everyone’s right to offend others – because if hurting someone else’s feelings even inadvertently is sufficient justification for muzzling, there will always be someone out there who is miffed by what you say, and freedom of speech is dead. Why, freedom of speech is just about miffing! What's the use of the freedom if you are not allowed to miff! With the rise of identity politics, which privileges a subjective sense of injury as actionable basis for prosecution, that is a battle that in the decade since I last spoke in Brisbane we’ve been losing.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 266: Worse: the left’s embrace of gotcha hypersensitivity inevitably invites backlash. Donald Trump appeals to people like me who have had it up to their eyeballs with being told what they can and cannot say. Pushing back against a mainstream culture of speak-no-evil suppression, they lash out in defiance, and then what they say is pretty appalling. I actually think President Trump is a real cool guy. Especially I love his hair, it most definitely is not black and curly like that other president's.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 268: Regarding identity politics, what’s especially saddened me in my recent career is a trend toward rejecting the advocacy of anyone who does not belong to the group. In 2013, I published Big Brother, a novel that grew out of my loss of my own older brother, who in 2009 died from the complications of morbid obesity. I was moved to write the book not only from grief, but also sympathy of morbid obesity: in the years before his death, as my brother grew heavier, I saw how dreadfully other people treated him – how he would be seated off in a corner of a restaurant, how the staff would roll their eyes at each other after he’d ordered, though he hadn’t requested more food than anyone else. Just a little wafer, is all.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 272: But in my events to promote Big Brother, like trying to peddle it to my acquaintances, I started to notice a pattern. Most of the people buying the book in the signing queue were thin. Well the whole queue was pretty thin. Especially in the US, fat is now one of those issues where you either have to be one of us, or you’re the enemy. It's like Christianity: who is not for Jesus is against him. We don't know if he was fat, but most likely he was scrawny, he could not even carry his cross. I verified this when I had a long email correspondence with a “Healthy at Any Size” activist, who was incensed by the novel, which she hadn’t even read. Which she refused to read. No amount of explaining that the novel was on her side, that it was a book that was terribly pained by the way heavy people are treated and how unfairly they are judged, could overcome the scrawny author’s photo on the flap.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 274: She and her colleagues in the fat rights movement did not want my advocacy. I could not weigh in on this material because I did not belong to the club. I found this an artistic, political, and even commercial disappointment – because in the US and the UK, if only skinny-minnies will buy your book, you’ve evaporated the pool of prospective obese consumers to a puddle.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 276: I worry that the clamorous world of identity politics is also undermining the very causes its activists claim to back. As a fiction writer, yeah, I do sometimes make my narrator an Armenian. But that’s only by way of a start. Merely being Armenian is not to have a character as I understand the word. I need to add a whole host of racial prejudices to fatten him out. Luckily I didn't need to do that with my bro.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 279: Membership of a larger group is not an identity. Being Asian is not an identity. Being gay is not an identity. Being deaf, blind, or wheelchair-bound is not an identity, nor is being economically deprived. Now what is an identity then? Silly, it is the number on your ID card! That's an identity! Everybody is unique, and I in particular am special! There are no classes except singletons! We are haecceitates every one of us. Us? There is no such thing as us, there is just me and me and me ... and me myself.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 283: I made this same point in relation to gender in Melbourne last week: both as writers and as people, we should be seeking to push beyond the constraining categories into which we have been arbitrarily dropped by birth. If we embrace narrow group-based identities too fiercely, we cling to the very cages in which others would seek to trap us. We pigeonhole ourselves. We limit our own notion of who we are, and in presenting ourselves as one of a membership, a representative of our type, an ambassador of an amalgam, we ask not to be seen. I have done my best to stretch my female identity, and after years of strenuous stretching it is in fact almost as long already as that of my drummer boy's.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 292: Which brings us to my final point. (Believe me, I am slowly really getting to wind up!) You do not all do it equally well as I. So it’s more than possible that we write from the perspective of a one-legged lesbian from Afghanistan and fall flat on our arses. We don’t get the dialogue right, and for insertions of expressions in Pashto we depend on Google Translate. I know, I had to do it for my Irish boy.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 294: Halfway through the novel, suddenly my protagonist has lost the right leg instead of the left one. My idea of lesbian sex is drawn from wooden internet porn. Efforts to persuasively enter the lives of others very different from us may fail: that’s a given. But maybe rather than having our heads taken off, we should get a few bucks for trying. After all, most fiction sucks. Most writing sucks. Mine does anyway. Most things that people make of any sort suck. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t make anything. Or that we should not suck. I do, however badly, and my drummer boy loves it.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 303: Lionel Shriver’s keynote address at the Brisbane writers festival was a poisoned package wrapped up in arrogance and delivered with condescension.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 307: I have never walked out of a speech. Or I hadn’t, until last night’s opening keynote for the Brisbane writers festival, delivered by the American author Lionel Shriver, best known for her novel, We need to talk about Kevin.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 310: “Mama, I can’t sit here,” I said, the corners of my mouth dragging downwards. “I cannot legitimise this …”
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 318: So what did happen? What did Shriver say in her keynote that could drive a woman who has heard every slur under the sun to discard social convention and make such an obviously political exit?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 320: Her question was — or could have been — an interesting question: What are fiction writers “allowed” to write, given they will never truly know another person’s experience?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 329: On and on it went. Rather than focus on the ultimate question around how we can know an experience we have not had, the argument became a tirade. It became about the fact that a white man should be able to write the experience of a young Nigerian woman and if he sells millions and does a “decent” job — in the eyes of a white woman — he should not be questioned or pilloried in any way. It became about mocking those who ask people to seek permission to use their stories. It became a celebration of the unfettered exploitation of the experiences of others, under the guise of fiction. (For more, Yen-Rong, a volunteer at the festival, wrote a summary on her personal blog about it.)
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 335: It’s not always OK if a white guy writes the story of a Nigerian woman because the actual Nigerian woman can’t get published or reviewed to begin with. It’s not always OK if a straight white woman writes the story of a queer Indigenous man, because when was the last time you heard a queer Indigenous man tell his own story? How is it that said straight white woman will profit from an experience that is not hers, and those with the actual experience never be provided the opportunity? It’s not always OK for a person with the privilege of education and wealth to write the story of a young Indigenous man, filtering the experience of the latter through their own skewed and biased lens, telling a story that likely reinforces an existing narrative which only serves to entrench a disadvantage they need never experience.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 341: In making light of the need to hold onto any vestige of identity, Shriver completely disregards not only history, but current reality. The reality is that those from marginalised groups, even today, do not get the luxury of defining their own place in a norm that is profoundly white, straight and, often, patriarchal. And in demanding that the right to identity should be given up, Shriver epitomised the kind of attitude that led to the normalisation of imperialist, colonial rule: “I want this, and therefore I shall take it.”
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 347: Her tone, I fear, betrayed otherwise. Humility is not Shriver’s cloak of choice.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 349: The kind of disrespect for others infused in Lionel Shriver’s keynote is the same force that sees people vote for Pauline Hanson. It’s the reason our First Peoples are still fighting for recognition, and it’s the reason we continue to stomach offshore immigration prisons. It’s the kind of attitude that lays the foundation for prejudice, for hate, for genocide.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 351: The fact Shriver was given such a prominent platform from which to spew such vitriol shows that we as a society still value this type of rhetoric enough to deem it worthy of a keynote address. The opening of a city’s writers festival could have been graced by any of the brilliant writers and thinkers who challenge us to be more. To be uncomfortable. To progress.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 353: A Maxine Beneba Clarke, who opened the Melbourne Writers’ Festival by challenging us to learn how to talk about race in a way that was melodic and powerful. A Stan Grant, who will ask us why we continue to allow our First People’s to wallow in inhumane conditions. An A.C. Grayling, if you really want the international flavour. Anyone who will ask us to be better, not demand we be OK with worse.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 383: Rowling aloitti opinnot Exeterin yliopistossa heti Wyedeanin koulusta valmistuttuaan. Hän pääsi yliopistoon mennessään pois mielestään ahdistavasta kodista ja heittäytyi heti yliopistoelämään mukaan (kenen mukaan? Seaninko?) Rowling valitsi pääaineekseen ranskan, mutta ei menestynyt siinä erityisen hyvin. Hänen huolellisuudessaan oli toivomisen varaa, ja aikaa kului paljon muuhun kuin opiskeluun, muun muassa kahvilassa ja baareissa oleiluun. Opintoihin kuuluvan Ranskassa vietettävän vuoden Rowling kulutti opiskelemalla englantia Pariisissa.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 431: JK Rowling took another tossing on Twitter on Sunday as she tweeted that “many health professionals are concerned that young people struggling with their mental health are being shunted towards hormones and surgery when this may not be in their best interests.”
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 438: Our stance is firm: transgender women are women,” said the statement by the fan sites. “Transgender men are men. Non-binary people are non-binary. Intersex people exist and should not be forced to live in the binary. We stand with Harry Potter fans in these communities. While we don’t condone the mistreatment [Rowling] has received for airing her opinions about transgender people, we must reject her beliefs.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 499: No mikäs ihme tää nyt on. Sama touhu on jatkunut keskeytymättä suoraan 1800-luvulta (ja tietty sitä ennenkin, ei vaan ollut tehtaita), ja siitä oli maristu jo vuosikymmeniä ennen Naimi Pikkuhousua ja muita "aktivisteja". Vizi oli vaan että tossa vuosituhannen taitteessa tämmönen aktivismi "trendasi" ja Naimi porukoineen sai siitä nimeä ja valtavia painosmääriä, siis mahtavasti paalua. Eli sekin oli vaan tollanen bränditrendi, ei muuta. Business as usual. No Logo is just another logo, is all.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 531: Gifford left Today in order to pursue a movie career both as an actress, and as a director and producer. She did a number of voice overs most notably as a spiny anteater in the 1998 TV series Hercules and in Higglytown Heroes as the Mail Carrier Hero in 2004. In 2018 she filmed a Hallmark Christmas movie for Hallmark Movies & Mysteries called A Godwink Christmas. Gifford intends to make movies about the experiences of losing a loved one and being a widow, as she now has first-hand experience of the role.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 537: In 1996 the National Labor Committee, a human rights group, reported that sweatshop labor was being used to make clothes for the Kathie Lee line, sold at Wal-Mart. The group reported that a worker in Honduras smuggled a piece of clothing out of the factory, which had a Kathie Lee label on it. One of the workers, Wendy Diaz, came to the United States to testify about the conditions under which she worked. She commented, "I wish I could talk to Kathie Lee. If she's good, she will help us." Gifford addressed Kernaghan's allegations on the air during Live! with Regis and Kathie Lee, explaining that she was not personally involved with hands-on project management in factories, and had never made a piece of clothing in her life.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 541: Rothien flagship poikaa Niklasta sanotaan Nikexi. Nike puolestaan on nekkebrändi jota myydään kalliisti ostetuilla urheilijajulkkixilla. Mustat myy valkoisia tossuja. Neket vaikka tappaa tai varastaa tai mukiloi äiskän niitä saadaxeen. Se on niille joku toteemi, Nikeissä nekkekin tuntee izensä tärkeäxi ja menestyväxi. Jos niistä vittuilee se on sama kuin vittuilis äiskästä. Kai six et kaikilla cooleilla cooneilla on mainoxissa sellaset. Paizi minun äitini ei pidä enää meetwuastista.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 579: Tangent: Thunberg told her millions of social media followers on Thursday she had been self-isolating for the past two weeks after returning home from a three-week trip in Central Europe. She said she reported symptoms associated with coronavirus, such as a fever and a cough. While she could not get tested for COVID-19 since Sweden is limiting tests to those in need of emergency medical treatment, she said it was “extremely likely” that she’s had it, given the combined symptoms and circumstances.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 603: Why are Latinos not considered white whereas Italians, Greeks, and Spanish are considered white?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 628: Yxi Jessen typerimmistä laukaisuista on se lasitaloläppä, siis toi et synnitön heittäköön ekan kiven eli rikka kautta malka silmässä. Se on siis aivan perseestä! two wrongs dont make a right? Totta helvetissä tekee. Silmä silmästä, lammas lampaasta, 2 parhaasta. Tasoihin on päästävä. Poinzina kai oli et onhan meillä tää puolueeton dumari, mutta sellaista ei ole, ei tule eikä tilata. Oikeus on vahvimman oikeutta, sano mitä sanot. Tohon pykälään konnat aina vetoaa osottaen jotain mielestään vielä ilkeämpää lurjusta. Hizi molemmille köniin ansionsa mukaan!
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 642: Tämän osti nahkoineen karvoineen vielä yxi Naimia huomattavasti ärrsyttävävämpi jenkkiämmyrkäinen, Jaakko Hintikan kotkan näköinenkin haahka nimeltä Debora L Spar. Barnardin tyttökoulun rehtori (Lionel Drivel oli sen oppilas) ja Harvardin liikekirjeopiston professori, selkeästi Naimista vielä koilliseen GAL-TAN asteikolla. Se kirjoitti myös kirjan (nimeltä Wonder Women) jossa sanotaan, että feministien olisi jo aika nostaa kaasujalkaa, kerta tasa-arvo miesten kanssa on jo saavutettu (siis mä oon saavuttanut sen ja mennyt joholle, mulla on löpsy vanha mies joka pitää huolta ruuista ja lapsista ja antaa mun kiitää kissanristiäisissä ihan vapaasti), joten voitaisiin nyt olla taas vähän vähemmän feministejä ja enempi feminiinisiä, siis tälläsiä herttasempia, naisellisempia ja pehmoisempia, ei tarvizisi angstata ja ahdistella niin hirveästi noita miehiä.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 79: Published in 2013, the DSM-5 makes many changes, some of them controversial, some not. There are 20 chapters containing categories of related disorders.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 132: Anger problems, including difficulty controlling anger, intense anger that may not fit the situation and/or angry outbursts
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 144: Paranoid thoughts or dissociative feelings, as if you are not a part of your own life or you're out of your body, that can emerge under stress.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 156: Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), a cluster B personality disorder, is considered to be one of the least identified personality disorders (Pies, 2011). On the other hand, a good number of patients with narcissistic traits present at the psychiatrist's office with other types of issues such as anxiety or depression. A common finding in clinical practice, NPD frequently coexists with other psychiatric disorders. NPD is a relatively recent diagnostic category. Its origins stem from a great effort between psychoanalysts and psychoanalytic psychotherapists to recognize a cluster of predominantly difficult patients who could not be classified as psychotic, not typically neurotic and overall not responsive to conventional psychotherapeutic treatment options (Gildersleeve, 2012).
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 158: Narsistit on voittopuolisesti miehiä, syitä ei tiedetä, tai ei olla tietävinään. Vähän ihmetellään (psykiatrien salakielellä) mixi kyselytutkimuxissa jää haaviin suht vähän narsisteja, kun psykiatrien vastaanotoilla niitä on kuin eliittiurheilijoita Salpausselällä. Niistä aika harvat varmaan on izeilmoittautujia.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 234: It was not that they were unnormal. It was that they were possessed by a higher being that caused them to have such genius levels of intelligence. This possession made them less sociable because they are aware of the darkening hearts of mankind. Those who know the truth, keep it to themselves. Those who do not know the truth, live in ignorance that is bliss.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 240: True, but there's more to it than this. Schizophrenia is not caused by wisdom.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 247: The truth is, schizophrenia has nothing to do with whether you are wise or intelligent. However, schizophrenia is a very misunderstood subject by your kind.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 251: In fact, the "symptoms" are not at all related to the causes of having a different level of neurotransmitter. You might as well call anyone who has the so-called symptoms of schizophrenia the unknown medical problem rather than grouping them into one label, just for the sake of it!
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 253: Funny thing is, nobody knows why neurotransmitters are of a different level for people with "schizophrenia" and blame it on this label. Those with such illnesses were not always measured for levels of neurotransmitters, they were only assumed to have such levels of neurotransmitters by the psychiatrist who has no real medical background like that of a surgeon. To worsen it, Earthling's medical science has yet to be able to measure these levels accurately and safely! Isn't this shocking?
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 257: When the body is in a certain state, be it in sleep, at rest, after a meal, after an emotional state etc, Neurotransmitter levels differ all the time. Measuring them at various states is the right way to do such scientific quantification. But even then, your body is responding to a stimuli and even then, your body is given a set of nutrients to work with to produce the optimal level of Homeostasis of the neurotransmitters. Therefore, understanding Homeostasis and how it works will lead you to understand that the levels of neurotransmitters is not a factor of schizophrenia at all.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 349: These spiritual issues affect the physical 3D body, and that obviously includes the brain. However, the body does not cause the spirit problem. It's the other way round.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 351: Spirit body is made of photon light that is not visible by the naked human eye of your kind unless you are clairvoyant. This is also backed by holography technology that is alien to your kind. When you finally catch up with your advancement of science… especially quantum mathematics, your findings will differ from your so-called modern science.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 355: The truth is out there. I often hear it whisper to me through my molar, which has become a neuroreceiver. I just wish the voices were not so angry with me.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 479: Tuo oli hyvin sanottu:
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 667: Critics of the RC scales assert they have deviated too far from the original clinical scales, the implication being that previous research done on the clinical scales will not be relevant to the interpretation of the RC scales. However, researchers on the RC scales assert that the RC scales predict pathology in their designated areas better than their concordant original clinical scales while using significantly fewer items and maintaining equal to higher internal consistency, reliability and validity; further, unlike the original clinical scales, the RC scales are not saturated with the primary factor (demoralization, now captured in RCdem) which frequently produced diffuse elevations and made interpretation of results difficult; finally, the RC scales have lower interscale correlations and, in contrast to the original clinical scales, contain no interscale item overlap.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 756: Seijan Saku-sedän diagnoosi oli toi sama. Se pelkäsi ihmisiä ja rynkäsi käden alta teeveen ääreen kuin säikähtänyt villisika. Senkin isä siis Seijan isoisä Wilho oli uskonnoll. fanaatt. Se "piirsi" kirjeen perään Wilho Pylkkänen, lähetyssaarnaaja. Uskovaiset sanoivat sitä pastorixi, poika Olkkari oli toimittaja. Saku oli perunkirjoissa vaan "herra". Herra Eino Sakari Pylkkänen. Siltä jäi oppikoulu kesken keskiluokilta. Se meni puutarhakouluun, niistä hommista se tykkäsi. Se oli hyvin paxu mutta lyhyt, ei sitä siitä pilkattu. Ei sanottu että penkille on noustava piätään kampoomaan, tai että tarvihtee kissansilityxeen jakkaran. Hyvä jotta jalat maahan yltäät.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 761: - Piirrä vihkoosi aprikoosi ja neuroosi. - Osaan piirtää vihkoosin ja aprikoosin ja mutta millainen on neuroosi? Kaikkia lievästi sekopäitä sanottiin mun piennä ollessa neuroottisixi. Nykyään se ei trendaa enää, eikä hysteerinen. Hullujen nimityxet on kuin brändejä, ne vaihtuu määrävälein "vähemmän leimaavixi". Siinä käy kuin kaikkien eufemismien, koska ei se sana leimaa vaan se asia.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 763: neuroosi; elimellisiin syihin perustumaton psyykkinen häiriö, jossa todellisuudentaju säilyy ja potilas kärsii ratkaisemattomien psyykkisten ristiriitatilanteiden aiheuttamista toistuvista tai suhteellisen pysyvistä oireista (mm. ahdistuneisuus, pelot, pakkotoiminnot, pitkäaikainen masennus tai erilaiset ruumiilliset vaivat, kuten toiminnalliset sydänhäiriöt).
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 767: Neurosis should not be mistaken for psychosis, which refers to a loss of touch with reality. Nor should it be mistaken for neuroticism, a fundamental personality trait proposed in the Big Five personality traits theory.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 929: Helpotus: Seuraavana päivänä opettaja katsoi paperia ja huusi ääni väristen: ’Nyt menen ilmiantamaan sinut poliisille. Katsotaan sitten, auttaako Jumalasi sinua!’ Tämän sanottuaan opettaja lähti koulun pihaan, hyppäsi pyöränsä satulaan ja polki tielle. Mutta hän ei päässyt pitkälle. Ajaessaan koulun portin ohi hän putosi yhtäkkiä pyöränsä päältä – hänen sydämensä pysähtyi ja hän kaatui kuolleena maahan. Lapset katselivat luokan ikkunasta ja näkivät tämän. He juoksivat ulos ja kerääntyivät järkyttyneinä opettajan ruumiin ympärille. Sitten yksi huusi kovalla äänellä ja toiset yhtyivät hänen huutoonsa: ’Jumala on ehdottomasti olemassa! Jumala on ehdottomasti olemassa!' Allah akbar! Allah akbar!”
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1127: Muuten painotetaan entistä selvemmin puolisoiden tasavertaisuutta, molemminpuolista apua ja keskinäistä tukea, jolloin puolisoilla on yhteinen vastuu ja yhteisiä tehtäviä:
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1131: Vuoden 2004 käsikirjassa ei ole enää yhtään raamatunkohtaa, joka viittaisi luomiskertomusten tai huoneentaulujen patriarkaaliseen ihmis- ja avioliittokäsitykseen. Entistä selvemmin painotetaan puolisoiden tasavertaisuutta, keskinäistä huolenpitoa ja tukea. Yhdessä rukouksessa on maininta siitä, että Jumala on asettanut avioliiton myös suojelemaan ja rikastuttamaan puolisoiden rakkautta. Tässä toistetaan jo edellisessä käsikirjassa esiintynyt ajatus avioliiton merkityksestä puolisoille. Vanhemmissa käsikirjoissa korostettiin useammin avioliiton merkitystä yhteiskunnalle. Nyt sen merkitys puolisoille saa enemmän huomiota. Porukoilla on yleensä niin vähän perittyä ettei siitä maxa vaivaa puhua. Avioliittokäsityksen mahdollista edelleen kehittämistä ajatellen tämä painopisteen muutos on varteenotettava asia.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1165: Höpö höpö, 7. päivänä herra isoherra lepäsi, ja niin pitäs meidänkin. Hizi kai evankeljumit kertois jos Jeesus oisi homostellut tai suorastaan mennyt naimisiin vaikka Johannexen kaa? Sittenhän se olis selvä nakki, mutta kun ei kerro. Jeesus oli kyllä hyvällä asialla sikäli että sunnuntaityö tuli sallituxi varsinkin palvelusammateissa, mutta täytistäkö piti heittää lapsi pesuveden mukana ja sallia rotinkaisille pitkä viikonloppu? Mitä se nyt pyhittää 2 pyhää pitää viikossa tyhjän panttina? Come to think of it, tokko sillä Jeesuxen parantamalla kroonikolla nyt niin kiire oli jalkeille ettei se ois voinut tulla vastaanotolle vasta sunnuntaina? Mutta palataanpa tähän tasa-arvoisuuteen ja sen teologisen merkityxeen.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1196: Myrskyisellä ja kirkkokriittisellä 60-luvulla piispat katsoivat velvollisuudekseen tehdä selkoa kirkkomme seksuaalietiikasta. Se tehtiin kannanotossa nimellä Ajankohtainen asia (1966). Siinä piispojen enemmistö - Karl-Erik Forssell ei allekirjoittanut kannanottoa, koska hän piti sen suhtautumista homoseksuaalisuuteen liian yksioikoisena ja jyrkkänä - katsoi, ettei saa syyttää homoseksuaalisesti suuntautuneita tästä luonteenpiirteestä, joten heillä on täysi kotipaikkaoikeus kirkossa. Mutta heidän ei kuitenkaan pidä elää tämän suuntautumisensa mukaisesti ja siten houkutella maamme nuorisoa syntiin. Siis: Kyllä ja ei.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1198: Seuraavassa kannanotossa, Kasvamaan yhdessä (1984) noudatimme suunnilleen samaa linjausta kuin 60-luvun piispat: Homoseksuaalisesti suuntautuneet eivät ole vastuussa suuntautumisestaan, mutta Raamatun mukaan homoseksuaalinen käyttäytyminen on luonnonvastainen ja synnillinen. Tämän linjauksen mukaisesti vastasin itse nuorten kysymyksiin piispantarkastusten koulukäyntien yhteydessä arkkihiippakunnan seurakunnissa. En tainnut puhua ”homoelämän” synnillisyydestä, mutta annoin ymmärtää, etten kannata esimerkiksi samaa sukupuolta olevien avioliittoja. Siis: Kyllä ja ei. Ei ihme että pääsin arkkipiispaxi. Jokainen suolansa arvoinen poliitikko vastaa juurikin näin: Kyllä ja ei.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1224: Riitta Mäenpää 23.01.2021 18:25: Avioliittokäsityksessä on paljon muuttunut. Muutoksen avainsanoja ovat esim. patriarkaalisuus, tasa-arvo, rakkaus, seksuaalisuuden merkitys, yksilön vapaus ja itsenäisyys, ns. avoliitot, ihmissuhdetaitojen arvostus, avioerot, eronneiden vihkiminen, perheiden rakenteet, yhteiskunnan lisääntynyt vastuunotto lasten kasvatuksesta. MUTTA tämän kehityksen aikana on ollut itsestäänselvyys, että avioliitto on miehen ja naisen välinen liitto. Ei siihen tarvi homojen työntyä väliin kakkaisine kyrpineen. Tämä kehitys on tapahtunut jo ennen kuin sukupuolineutraalista avioliitosta alettiin keskustella. Vaatimus samaa sukupuolta olevien avioliitosta ei ole jatkoa em. kehitykselle. Se on uusi keksintö, harhapolku, jonka taustalla on virheellinen käsitys avioliitosta.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 1355: Hohhoijaa. Olen väsynyt olemaan koko ajan ilkeä. Koitan nyt suhtautua suopeammin kirjailijoihin ja heidän sepustuxiinsa. Esim Doston Setämiehen uni on muka-komiikan alla suht tarkkasilmäistä sielutiedettä. Eikä se ole puiseva kuten pelkäsin. Pitkäripsisestä Zinasta tulee mieleen joku venäläinen kaunotar, oliskohan Igor Kudashevin rouva Irina. Vaikka sittemmin Juha Janhusen pikkurouva Katjakin oli kaunotar anatomian laitoxen aikoina. Jälkeenpäin ajatellen sillä oli ehkä haku päällä. Mutta molemmat on blondeja.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 38: This development could open up a bizarre vision of the universe in which black holes can cough themselves into nothingness, Hawking said during recent lectures on the BBC and at Harvard. “This raises a serious problem that strikes at the heart of our understanding of science,” he said. “If determinism, the predictability of the universe, breaks down with black holes, it could break down in other situations,” he said. “Even worse, if determinism breaks down, we can’t be sure of our past history, either. The history books and our memories could just be illusions,” he said. The Nobel prize could just be an illusion, he said. Two years later he died.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 50: Gravity is more subtle, though: the real problem is not so much nonrenormalizability as high-energy behavior inconsistent with local quantum field theory. In quantum mechanics, if you want to probe physics at short distances, you can scatter particles at high energies. (You can think of this as being due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, if you like, or just about properties of Fourier transforms where making localized wave packets requires the use of high frequencies.) By doing ever-higher-energy scattering experiments, you learn about physics at ever-shorter-length scales. (This is why we build the LHC to study physics at the attometer length scale.)
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 54: This tells us that quantum gravity, at very high energies, is not a quantum field theory in the traditional sense. It's a stranger theory, which probably involves a subtle sort of nonlocality that is relevant for situations like black hole horizons.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 56: None of this is really a contradiction between general relativity and quantum mechanics. For instance, string theory is a quantum mechanical theory that includes general relativity as a low-energy limit. What it does mean is that quantum field theory, the framework we use to understand all non-gravitational forces, is not sufficient for understanding gravity. Black holes lead to subtle issues that are still not fully understood. But not contradictions, just lacunae.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 80: Hawking sanoo että kaikkeus on nyhjästy tyhjästä, mutta se ei vakuuttanut Perza Rovamoa (joka heitti mut ulos marxismi-leninismin opintopiiristä kun uskalsin ehdottaa Hegelin vastakkaista mielipidettä), eikä se vakuuta Hannu Mäkelää. Aristarkhos 300 eKr. ymmärsi taivaankappaleiden asennot, mutta se ei vakuuttanut aikalaisia, eikä vakuuta Flat Earth porukoita vieläkään. Lyödäänkö vetoa, huutaa Blaise paskalta mustalta reijältä.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 84: Ex nihilo, nihil fit – is one of the propositions to which great significance was attributed in metaphysics. The proposition is either to be viewed as just a barren tautology, nothing is nothing, or, if becoming is supposed to have real meaning in it, then, since only nothing comes from nothing, there is in fact none in it, for the nothing remains nothing in it. Becoming entails that nothing not remain nothing, but that it pass over into its other, being. – Later metaphysics, especially the Christian, rejected the proposition that out of nothing comes nothing, thus asserting a transition from nothing into being; no matter how synthetically or merely imaginatively it took this proposition, there is yet even in the most incomplete unification of being and nothing a point at which they meet, and their distinguishedness vanishes. –
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 85: The proposition, nothing comes from nothing, nothing is just nothing, owes its particular importance to its opposition to becoming in general and hence also to the creation of the world out of nothing. Those who zealously hold firm to the proposition, nothing is just nothing, are unaware that in so doing they are subscribing to the abstract pantheism of the Eleatics and essentially also to that of Spinoza. The philosophical view that accepts as principle that being is only being, nothing only nothing, deserves the name of 'system of identity'; this abstract identity is the essence of pantheism. - Hegel, 'Becoming', in 'The Science of Logic', 1812. [Kay Sage, 'Arithmetic of Breaking Wind', 1947]
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 93: The Principle of Reason, the text of an important and influential lecture course that Martin Heidegger gave in 1955-56, takes as its focal point Leibniz's principle: nothing is without reason. Heidegger shows here that the principle of reason is in fact a principle of being. Much of his discussion is aimed at bringing his readers to the "leap of thinking," which enables them to grasp the principle of reason as a principle of being. This text presents Heidegger's most extensive reflection on the notion of history and its essence, the Geschick of being, which is considered on of the most important developments in Heidegger's later thought. One of Heidegger's most artfully composed texts, it also contains important discussions of language, translation, reason, objectivity, and technology as well as remarkable readings of Leibniz, Kant, Aristotle, and Goethe, among others. And lots of black-and-white pictures of scantily dressed women.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 131: Newton huomas että lepo ja tasainen liike tuntuu samalta. Einstein huomas että makuu ja tasainen kiihdytys tuntuu samalta, tai painottomuus ja vapaa pudotus.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 168: 1969 "Buzz" Aldrin ja "Veny Käsivahva" Armstrong laskeutuivat kuuhun potkiskelemaan kuupölyä. Pieni askel miehelle, vielä pienempi mieslajille. JOS laskeutuivat, ehkä se oli pelkkää huijausta, Pirkko Zilles on siitä vakuuttunut. Holokaustifilmitkin oli lavastettuja. Tapsa missas ohjelman, koska oli Liverpoolissa kuuuntelemassa René Thomin katastrofiteorian luentoa. L I V, E R P, double-O L, Liverpool FC. Not the plan! Noihin aikoihin ei ollut nettitelevisiota. Mä näin sen Münchenin juna-aseman telkkareista Kreetan-matkalla. Se muutti ihmislajin tulevaisuuden. Mitä vittua. Huonoon suuntaan se oli mennyt jo aikapäiviä. Kun kuulennot eivät jatkuneet, Tapsan tapaiset lupaavat nuoret brittitutkijat pettyivät ja alkoivat trainspotata sekä särkeä hylättyjä taloja Yorkshiren slummeissa. Falklandin sota vähän piristi, ja aavikkomyrsky, mutta nyt on taas pelkästään TYYYYLLLSÄÄÄÄ. Yxi poskilihas ei oikeen korvaa salikäyntejä. Brexit ei ehtinyt paljon haitata Tapsaa ennenkun se teki oman exitin. "Uusi miehitettyjen avaruuslentojen ohjelma palauttaisi suuren yleisön innostuxen avaruutta ja ylipäänsä tiedettä kohtaan." Onhan paljon hauskempaa kazella kuin jätkän käy, ja ihmetellä huuli pyöreenä kun irtopäät ja suolenpätkät lentelevät epäonnistuneessa lähtökiireessä. Astronautteja vois taas haastatella tai niiden surevia perheitä ja niistä tehdä purkkakuvia, niinkuin hienolla 60-luvulla. Voi helvetti.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 170: 2007 raajarikolla oli tilaisuus päästä 4min painottomuuslennolle. Se osoitti että kuka tahansa voi päästä avaruuteen. Vitun julkkis. Avaruudessa ei ole hyvä oleskella pitempään, se heikentää lihaxia. LOL. No pinnan alle kaivautuminen on suojaisaa, Tapsalla on nyt syytä iloita. Marsin elämä voisi tehdä lopun maan elämästä. Pitää olla varovaisia. Pitäisikö meidän porata Euroopan pintaan Espoon syvin reikä? Etmä inhoon tämmösiä tiedefriikkejä. Pekka Reinikainen on oikeassa, niillä piisaa hybristä, ne rakastaa kunniaa ja pimeitä reikiä. Mahdollisiin maailmoihin matkustus ei onnistu nykytekniikalla, mutta (mieliku-) vitustamme käsin voimme tehdä tähtienvälisiä matkoja. Matka kestäisi 3M vuotta. Joo lähde vaan Tapsa, mä katon kellosta millon sä oisit perillä.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 192: Olin Muskin kanssa Future of Life-instituutin hississä. Meillä oli ihanaa. Saavutimme painottomuuden tunteita. Mielestäni on tärkeää, että kaikki tietävät miten meillä oli ihanaa. Mielestäni on tärkeää, ettei historiaan enää kiinnitetä huomiota, vaan kazeet suunnataan tekoälykkäästi tulevaisuuteen. Ainoa asia minkä historiasta opimme on että emme opi siitä mitään. Mixi siis vaivautua. Uuden teknologian avulla voimme korjata vaurioita, joita edelliset teknologiat ovat tehneet luonnolle. Paizi että emme käytä sitä siihen, vaan entistä tehokkaampaan rikastumiseen luonnon kustannuxella. Mitäpä leobardi mahtaa täplilleen.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 210: Although I did not know Prof. Hawking, I do have ALS, which puts me in a similar situation. He has to have someone to help him. As simple as that. Although they may use a Hoyer lift, and if he still values his privacy, he may also use a bidet rather than being wiped. This is a terribly debilitating illness, that presents new challenges at every turn.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 213: ALS (the disease which professor Hawking had) is a motor-neuron disease, and thus only affects the voluntary muscle functions, which does not include gut peristalsis (which is essential for stool formation and expulsion). Our bowel movements occur under subconscious control, even when paralyzed they still work normally due to the effects of the autonomic nervous system. The only thing we control voluntarily is our anal sphincter. However, in the case of Professor Hawking, he likely had no control.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 219: V. Hawking was actually spotted in church not infrequently in Cambridge. In Britain, you’re not actually expected to believe in God in order to go to church, if you feel like going to church. If you do believe in God, you’re not expected to go to church either. You go to church if you like going to church for some reason, and that’s that.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 230: Ankean harmaana kevätpäivänä Cambridgessa mustien aukkojemme saattue lähti matkaan kohti yliopiston Great Job Steven kirkkoa. Nuoria ihmisiä Tintti-julisteineen parveili joka paikassa. Collegen juhla-asuinen pedelli norsusauvoineen ja silinterihattuineen käveli hitaasti pitkin katua. Tätini puristi kättäni. Aloimme molemmat itkeä. "Hän olisi ollut tästä mielissään", täti kuiskasi. Steven ääni lähetettiin radioteleskoopilla kohti mustaa aukkoa. Yllättävän vaatimaton kaveri. Ei jättänyt koskaan kertomatta viziä. Yllättävän paljon yhteistä sillä on Pekan kaa. Se opetti lapsistaankin röyhkeitä, Lucy sai piispan kyynelehtimään tiukatessaan siltä jumalatodistuxia. Moinen ei todellakaan ole tapana. Tapsan poika viittasi fyysikkokouxessa ja pyysi puheenvuoroa esittääxeen jonkun typerän kysymyxen sedille. (Mä tein samoin Sepun väitöstilaisuudessa.) Nenäkkäitä lapsia. Äiti sai pientä taukoa alituisista hoitovelvollisuuxistaan. Olikohan Mason mukana hautajaisissa? Kiitoxet Homer Simpsonille, jonka kanssa Tapsa teki uraauurtavaa yhteistyötä Simpsonit-televisiosarjassa. Steve ei varmaan ollut lukenut sitä kohtaa raamatussa jossa sanotaan että se on totta.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 304: Alkoholipoliittisissa artikkeleissaan ja kannanotoissaan Reinikainen vaatii muun muassa keskioluen ja siiderin myynnin siirtämistä vähittäiskaupoista Alkon yksinoikeudeksi, alkoholin anniskeluikärajojen nostamista ja väkevien alkoholijuomien verotuksen palauttamista vuotta 2004 edeltäneelle tasolle. Hän on sanonut olevansa itse entinen alkoholisti. (Oikeestiko entinen? Lähde?)
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 462: Vähän hauskaa naisten kustannuxella, eikös teistä olis kätevämpi olla pussieläimiä, tai munia munia? Mutta ei, jumalalla oli suuremmat suunnitelmat mielessä. Se ei käynyt läpi välimuotoja (noi ei tosiaankaan olleet niitä), vaan se teki samantien kikyloikan ja tempas eevan aatamilta noppelasti kyljestä, mutta kielsi sitten ankarasti työntämästä hyödytöntä kikkeliä vielä tarpeettomampaan pillunreikään. Elukoillahan ne oli käytössä, mutta apinalla ei niitä tarvita, eikä lapsia. Tissitkin on vaan jättimäiset hikirauhaset aatamille viihteexi. (Vaikka edellä tuli sanottua ettei ihmisellä ole yhtään ylimääräisiä ruumiinosia.)
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 464: Monisoluiset elukat kehittyy kopiointivirheistä! Siis haloo, hnehneh. (Epäuskoista naurua. Miten tällä hemmolla on noin paljon ennakkoluuloja? No ne se on oppinut muilta uskovaisilta. Uskonnot on valtavia nippuja ennakkoluuloja, arvotaan ennakkoon miten meille tulee käymään loppupeleissä. Arpa on heitetty, toivotaan parasta ja pelätään pahinta. Ollaan paniikissa ja sitten kriisissä. Suurelle yleisölle ei kerrota, että jumala on laittanut kirahville tukisukat. Pekkaa ihmetyttää miten moni asia voi kehittyä unisonossa. Se on nimeltään koevoluutiota, pöhkö. Kirahvi kilpailee puiden kanssa vitamiineista.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 482: Berlinski´s books have received mixed reviews, and been criticized for containing historical and mathematical inaccuracies. One critic said, "I haven't learned anything from [Berlinski's] book except that the novel of mathematics is best written in another style." He is the author of several detective novels starring private investigator Aaron Asherfeld, and a number of shorter works of fiction and non-fiction.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 484: An opponent of biological evolution, Berlinski is a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, a Seattle-based think tank that is a hub of the pseudoscientific intelligent design movement. Berlinski shares the movement's rejection of the evidence for evolution, but does not openly avow intelligent design and describes his relationship with the idea as: "warm but distant. It's the same attitude that I display in public toward my ex-wives." Berlinski is a critic of evolution, yet, "Unlike his colleagues at the Discovery Institute,...[he] refuses to theorize about the origin of life." Vitun jutku, ei niihin ole luottamista, jeesuxen murhaajiin.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 490: Professor Stuart Burgess. About: I have a passion for designing engineering systems including bio-inspired designs. Like many scientists I believe that the natural world has a Designer. The purpose of this website is to share some of my design work and to share personal views about why I believe in a Creator. Below is a picture of me holding our two family Chihuahuas – Bambi and Minnie. They were created by the Creator, not me. My creation articles:
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 500: The above quote is a classic example of evolution being a god-of-the-gaps explanation. There is a total gap in what evolution can explain about the origin of life, and Dawkins invokes the god of evolution to fill in the gap and asserts that natural selection “must” have gotten started somehow. But natural selection by itself cannot create anything; it can only select from things already created.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 502: How dense can these creation types really be? Wanting very much for something to be true turns people into imbeciles. The least one can say for Dawkins is that he knows what he doesn´t know. He his happy to just wait and see. One of my daughters challenged the teacher and said, “Miss, you keep saying ‘evolution did it,’ but you never actually explain how evolution did it.” The teacher had to confess that my daughter made a valid criticism, and the rest of class agreed. So what? How did god create the snake? Did he roll it like Gary Larson shows, or did he use some other method? Did he just make a hypnotic gesture? (Yes, see below.)
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 527: Speed: 21.1 knots (39.1 km/h; 24.3 mph)
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 536: Käy selväxi ettei Pekan tyyppisellä kreationismilla ole mitään kiistaa genetiikan kanssa, toisin kuin Lysenkolla. Koko erimielisyys rajoittuu vaan siihen mistä tuli se ensimmäinen mälli tai spermapisara. Tuliko se kuumasta keitoxesta vai jumalanko vielä kuumemmasta kärjestä. Suunnitteliko jumala lajikirjavuuden heti alusta, vai oliko Darwinin multasorkka mukana pelissä. Vielä nasevammin sanottuna: tarkoituxellako täällä ollaan vaiko vahingossa. Sehän se on avainkysymys: onko Pietarilla taivaan avaimet, vai onko ovet multakuoppaan lengollaan.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 560: Shell-shocked, Isis set out to find all the pieces of Osiris’s body. Aided by Nephthys, Isis was able to retrieve all the body parts of Osiris, except Osiris penis. Isis called on the god Anubis to help in the mummification process. After that, she cast a magical spell on Osiris dismembered parts, bringing him back to life. However, he did not come back in his old self. He was instead reborn in the land of the dead (the Underworld). Before he departed for the Underworld, Isis mated with him and became pregnant with Horus (the falcon-headed god. Apparently the missing penis was located eventually.)
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 562: As lord of the underworld, Osiris’s was responsible for judging the souls of the dead. In that role, he earned the name Khentiamenti or “the Foremost of the Westerners”. If the dead person was deemed to have lived an upright life, the soul of the dead would be ushered into the bosoms of Osiris, i.e. into eternal paradise. However, if the person was found guilty by the panel, the soul of dead was instantly consumed by the demon Ammit. Thus, the soul vanished into eternal nothingness.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 122: What more than anything is missing in recent films, and shines splendidly in Maxwell’s films, is the sense of glory, the feeling that some have lived on an elevated plane according to the dictates of the highest sense of duty and honor. It’s an unfashionable feeling today, and mocked by those who conspicuously lack it, who love weakly, who think solely in quotidian, political terms. It cannot be understood by those without religious faith, for Heaven is a City of Glory and glory is the special attribute of a God who, if hidden, nevertheless offers us a glimpse of the special virtue of his glory in the lives of those who in moments of danger are willing to sacrifice themselves for a cause they think greater than themselves; and that, above the messiness of political squabbles, is the message behind Maxwell’s films. (The American Spectator 2015)
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 124: Ron Maxwell is (or was) an ardent Trump supporter. He fears some truly inspired Shakespeare director is sure to portray Duncan as Trump, so that Macbeth can spend a full five minutes frenetically stabbing him in his sleep, which should provide ample time for the Trump hating zealots to achieve their ultimate catharsis. But this does not make Trump a villain. As with all of Shakespeares characters, Trump is entirely human in his complexity and contradiction. Shakespeare for dummies indeed.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 156: Dostojevski on yhtä kaunopuheinen lipevän Maria Alexandrovnan housuissa kuin Karamazovin ryppyozaisempien poikien. Sekin todistaa jotakin, mitä? lähinnä sen että kaunopuheisuus on aivan halpahintaista. Sen lankaan ei pidä lainkaan mennä. Kaikki kysymykset on ratkaistava tiukasti faktapohjalta, tai jos ne ei ole faktoja vaan kannanottoja, niin sittenkin asialinjalla. Jos joku lähtee vetoomaan ylevämpiin tunteisiin niin se on takuulla mamuhuijari.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 265: “See, I will break the bow of Elam, the mainstay of their might. I will bring against Elam the four winds from the four quarters of heaven; I will scatter them to the four winds, and there will not be a nation where Elam’s exiles do not go. I will shatter Elam before their foes, before those who want to kill them; I will bring disaster on them, even my fierce anger,” declares the Lord. “I will pursue them with the sword until I have made an end of them. I will set my throne in Elam and destroy her king and officials,” declares the Lord. "Yet I will restore the fortunes of Elam in days to come,” declares the Lord
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 274: THAT WAS ONLY THE BEGINNING. But this did not fulfill Jeremiah’s prophecy, which wouldn’t even be given for at least another 50 years. Susa was rebuilt, only to be conquered again, this time by the Persian King Cyrus. It was rebuilt again and renovated by King Darius the Great to serve as the capital of the Persian Empire. Susa was mentioned in Daniel 8:2 as the location where the prophet received a vision recorded in Daniel 8 of the subsequent conquest of the Persian Empire by Alexander the Great. This prophecy was fulfilled two hundred years later when Susa surrendered without a battle to Alexander.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 277: WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? A case can be made for the view that “Persian” and “Elamite” are not two names for the same people but that having conquered Elam, Persia became the successor to Elam, whose original inhabitants, as Jeremiah’s prophecy indicates, have been scattered to the four winds and absent from the pages of history for over 2,500 years. Evidence of the difference in origin between the Elamites and the Persians came from the mouth of none other than Persian King Darius the Great who said, “I am Darius, the great king, the king of kings, the king of many countries and many people, the king of this expansive land, the son of Wishtaspa of Achaemenid, Persian, the son of a Persian, ‘Aryan’, from the Aryan race” (From Darius the Great’s Inscription in Naqshe-e-Rostam).
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 278: Some scholars say Iran means “land of the Aryans” and claim that the Iranians are not descendants of Shem, as the Elamites were, but more likely came from Japeth, whose descendants are mostly Caucasians. This supports the view that Elam and Persia are not different names for the same people. Also, the native languages of the two groups were different.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 279: This may explain why Ezekiel, who wrote from Babylon at the same time Jeremiah was writing from Jerusalem, identified one of the major participants in the Battle of Ezekiel 38 as being Persia, and not Elam. God might have informed him, as He did Jeremiah, that the Elamites would be conquered and scattered to the four winds by their Persian neighbors.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 280: It could also help us understand why the Arabs of the Middle East today are so opposed to the Iranians gaining any kind of political or military advantage over them. Even though they share varieties of the same religion (Islam), the Persians are not Arabs. As an example, if you follow our “Prophecy in the Headlines” feature, you’ve probably read about Saudi Arabian officials announcing that because of the US pursuit of a more cooperative relationship with Iran, the Saudi kingdom will henceforth be limiting its interaction with the US and going its own way where Middle Eastern affairs are concerned.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 283: For an instant, I thought I had offended him. Then, as if he was correcting a child, He said, “Persians are not Arabs. We’re Caucasians.”) But there’s one verse that prevents us from proclaiming Jeremiah’s prophecy to be completely fulfilled in history. Jeremiah 49:39 says, “Yet I will restore the fortunes of Elam in days to come, declares the Lord.”
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 288: I think it’s reasonable to expect prophecies that have only been partially fulfilled in history to have their ultimate fulfilment in our future. The idea that a partial historical fulfilment points to a complete future fulfilment is a well established principle in the Bible. Two examples we’ve reviewed recently are Isaiah 17 and Psalm 83. The literal and complete fulfilment of these prophecies has not happened yet.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 297: I frankly can’t say how or when God will restore Elam’s fortunes. But based on what I know currently, I am not comfortable with the substitution of Iran for Elam in Jeremiah 49:34-39. The truth is, we don’t need Jeremiah 49 to know what will happen to Iran, and the Bible doesn’t say how or when Elam’s fortunes will be restored. The only thing we know for sure is that God said it and therefore He will do it.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 370: Here’s another hint that Moab and Ammon will yet fall back under the control of Israel. And Edom will receive an extra portion of the Lord’s wrath:
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 373: For the Lord has a day of vengeance, a year of retribution, to uphold Zion’s cause. Edom’s streams will be turned into pitch, her dust into burning sulfur; her land will become blazing pitch! It will not be quenched night or day; its smoke will rise forever. From generation to generation it will lie desolate; no one will ever pass through it again. The desert owl and screech owl will possess it; the great owl and the raven will nest there. God will stretch out over Edom the measuring line of chaos and the plumb line of desolation (Isaiah 34:5-11).
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 384: A: The Iranians are the modern day Persians who originated in Elam, not Edom. Edom was the birthplace of the Ammonites and the Moabites and was later inhabited by the family of Esau, Jacob’s brother. Edom got its name from Esau, and is called Jordan today. Elam was located further east on the other side of Iraq, where Iran is today. Obadiah prophesied against the Edomites who were driven out of their capital (Petra) by the Nabateans, a Bedouin people descended from Ishmael, in fulfillment of Obadiah’s prophecy. Many believe that during the Great Tribulation, the Jordanians will hide believing Jews in Petra where God will protect them against the anti-Christ. The area is called Bosrah in Isaiah 63.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 395: Kalle Väänäsen kynästä ovat myös Savolaesta sanarrieskoo, 1924, Uutta sanarrieskoo, 1925, Pöljäm pysäkiltä palamupuihen siimekseen, 1926, Runokaakin kavionkapsetta, 1926, Letkuvarrev viereltä, 1927, Sanarrieskoo, 1930, Tulipa Kytrelahden naisillekin kesä, 1930, Sanarrieskoo kolomas kannikka, 1930, Sanarrieskoo, kootut murrerunot, 1931, Poliisin poika, 1938, Vainotien vartijat, 1939, Korsusta korsuun Kannaksella, 1941, Runoruunalla ryssää päin, 1942. Se omistamisen ilo antaa ihmiselle voimia, panee Kalle murrejutun päälle pisteen.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 525: Tää on taas nyt tätä, tahdonvapauden onkelmaa ja teodikeaa, josta apina ei näytä pääsevän eroon enempää kuin kirpuistaan. Molemmat ovat aivan älyttömiä. Sama se onko maailman meno determinististä tai puolisatunnaista, tämmöstä se on kuitenkin, yrittänyttä ei laiteta eikä perixi antanutta panna. Jos tahdot varmistua miten huonosti on maailma suunniteltu ala kaikin mokomin marista ja juurittaa. Sekin oli sitten etukäteen tiedossa. Ja sit toi mixi mixi. Siihen oikea vastaus on ettei mixikään. Ei tällä kaikella ole tämän kummempaa tarkoitusta; kuten jo tuli sanotuxi, tämmöstä tää nyt on. Puuttuu vaan kysymys minne mä meen sitku mua ei enää ole. Tarvizeeko vastata?
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 531: Yhden vapaus on toisen vapauden menetys, one man's roof is another man's ceiling. You feel happy like a house without a roof. Filunkipelin pelisääntöjä yhtä kaikki. Yhden oikeus on toisen wälläriys.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 593: After the 1995 finding of a Luwian biconvex seal at Troy VII, there has been a heated discussion over the language that was spoken in Homeric Troy. Frank Starke of the University of Tübingen demonstrated that the name of Priam, king of Troy at the time of the Trojan War, is connected to the Luwian compound Priimuua, which means "exceptionally courageous"."The certainty is growing that Wilusa/Troy belonged to the greater Luwian-speaking community," but it is not entirely clear whether Luwian was primarily the official language or it was in daily colloquial use.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 630: Overall, both versions appear to be Aramaic rather than Hebrew because of the verb שבק‎ (šbq) "abandon", which is originally Aramaic. The "pure" Biblical Hebrew counterpart to this word, עזב‎ (‘zb) is seen in the second line of Psalm 22, which the saying appears to quote. Thus, Jesus is not quoting the canonical Hebrew version (ēlī ēlī lāmā ‘azabtānī) attributed in some Jewish interpretations to King David cited as Jesus' ancestor in Matthew's Genealogy of Jesus if the Eli, Eli version of Jesus' outcry is taken; he may be quoting the version given in an Aramaic Targum (surviving Aramaic Targums do use šbq in their translations of the Psalm).
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 658: Pyhä Geronimo (Ep. 73) nakkaa rodeen anonyymin työn missä M. samastetaan Holy Ghostiin. Noin v. AD 600, Timotheus, Konstantinoopelin presbyteeri, kirjassaan Vääräuskoisten vastaanottokritiikki, lisää uutta pesua kaipaavien harhaoppisten listaan melchisedekiläiset (Magaralaiset), "joita kuzutaan nyttemmin nimellä Athingani. Ne asuu Phrygiassa, eivätkä ole juutalaisia eivätkä gentiilejä. Ne pitää sapattia ympärileikkaamattomina. Ne eivä koske kehenkään. Jos niille tarjoo ruokaa, ne käskee panna sen maahan; sitten ne tulee ja ottaa sen. Ne antaa tavaroita toisille yhtä varovaisesti."
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 680: Then said they unto him, Say now Shibboleth: and he said Sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce it right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at that time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 686: Considered less plausible by academic and Jewish authorities are the claims of several western Christian and related groups, in particular those of the Church of God in Christ. It claims that the whole UK is the direct descendant of Ephraim, and that the whole United States is the direct descendant of Manasseh, based on the interpretation that Jacob had said these two tribes would become the most supreme nations in the world. Some adherents of Messianic Judaism also identify as part of Joseph on the basis that, regardless of any genetic connection which may or may not exist, they observe the Torah and interpret parts of the Tanakh in certain ways.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 690: Latter-day Saints also believe that the main groups of the Book of Mormon (Nephites and Lamanites) were parts of the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh. They believe that this would be the fulfilment of part of the blessing of Jacob, where it states that "Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall" (Genesis 49:22, interpreting the "wall" as the ocean). The idea being that they were a branch of Israel that was carefully led to another land for their inheritance.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 770: Nevertheless, most Christians, Muslims, Jews and Mormons now disagree with such interpretations, because in the biblical text, Ham himself is not cursed, and race or skin color is never mentioned.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 62: Hyttyet, anatarkati anottuna ja ehkä lieväti, ovat vain tuholaiia ihmiille, ja niiden tyypilliet kevät- ja keähampaidat aiheuttavat kipua, kutinaa ja turvotuta ueimmia ihmiiä
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 77: Hyttyset, sanatarkasti sanottuna ja ehkä lievästi, ovat vain tuholaisia ihmisille, ja niiden tyypilliset kevät- ja kesähampaidat aiheuttavat kipua, kutinaa ja turvotusta useimmissa ihmisissä. Jotkut eläimet kääntävät pöydät näiden ärsyttävien hyönteisten päälle ja tekevät hyttysiä osaksi omaa ruokavaliotaan; vaikka ajatus näiden hyttysten saalistajien käytöstä tuholaistorjunta-aineina on houkutteleva, tosiasiassa ne auttavat harvoin säästämään hyttyspopulaatioita merkittävässä määrin.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 81: Hyönteisiä, jotka syövät hyttysiä, ovat sudenkorennot ja niiden vähemmän tunnetut serkut, damselflies. Sudenkorentoilla on taipumus ruokkia päivällä, kun yöllä aktiivisimmat hyttyset ovat suurimmaksi osaksi piilossa läheisessä alusharjassa. Seurauksena aikuisten sudenkorentojen hyttysen saanti on alhaisempi kuin optimaalinen. Onneksi (hyttysvihareille) sudenkorennon toukat tosiasiallisesti syövät hyttysen toukiin, kun ne pystyvät, siinä määrin kuin sudenkorennot tekevät suurimman osan saalistusvaurioistaan hyttysille ennen kuin kumpikaan hyönteinen on jopa lähellä kypsää.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 146: Laboratoriolasitavarat ja toiminnot
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 182: She is best known for her philosophical treatises on feminism and women's role in society. She is an advocate of liberal feminism and women migrant workers' rights in France. Except wearing scarfs, that is not a right but a left. Badinter is described as having a commitment to Enlightenment rationalism and universalism. She advocates for a "moderate feminism". A 2010 Marianne news magazine poll named her France's "most influential intellectual", primarily on the basis of her bestselling books on women's rights and motherhood.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 214: Varhaisbaletti-izekuria. Mitä potaskaa. Kuolemattomuus on ylimainostettua. Tilanne on toivoton muttei vakava, koittaisizä säkin Koko sen vähitellen oppia. Hubara tarkoittaa trappilintua. Trapit (Otididae) on lintujen heimo, jonka jäseniä elää Aasiassa, Australiassa, Euroopassa ja varsinkin Afrikassa. Kuusitoista heimon 25 lajista on afrikkalaisia. Trapit ovat kaikkiruokaisia ja pesivät maassa. Ne kävelevät tanakasti vahvoilla jaloillaan. Monilla lajeilla on näyttävät soidinmenot.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 249: Kv minimiveroaste globaaleille yrityxille olisi hyvä asia, paizi 15% on aivan liian vähän. Siinä käy sama moka kuin minimipalkassa, minimirimasta tulee maximikatto. Perussa oikeistopopulistipresidenttiehdokas on japski ämmä, varmaan Japanista sodan jälkeen paenneiden fasistien jälkeläinen. Vasemmistoehdokas on miekkonen, varmaan joku intiaani tai mestizi. Oikeistopopulistien ja vasemmistolaisten ero on ketä ne luulee kannattavan mätkiä päästäxeen ize paremmille leiville. Oikeistopopulistit luulevat että on vielä riittävästi niitä huonompia että kanzii ulvoa kapitalistisutten kanssa samassa kimpassa kuin Surku Yniäinen ja mätkiä niiden apulaisina vielä surkeampia. Vasemmistolaiset arvioivat ize olevansa jo niin pohjalla, että paras strategia on ravistella rikkaampia siinä toivossa että pennosia putoo niiden lahkeista. Tavoite on sama, me first, keinot toiset.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 261: Tää kaikki aktivoitui kun löysin jostain vaihtohyllystä Marion Santo Domingo-pläjäyxen nimeltä Vuohen juhla, el fiesta del chivo. Tän San Domingon diktaattorilla Trujillolla mässyttelevän bühleinin huippukohta on seuraava Lösähdyxen märkä uni.

Trujillo is tormented by both his incontinence and impotence. Trujillo sexually assaulted Urania. Mix just Urania? Veikkaan et tää on viittaus Löysän homofiliaan. He is unable to achieve an erection with Urania and, in frustration, rapes her with his bare hands. This event is the core of Urania's shame and hatred towards her own father. In addition, it's the cause of Trujillo's repeated anger over the "anemic little bitch" who witnessed his impotence and emotion, as well as the reason he's en route to "sleep" with another girl on the night of his assassination.

xxx/ellauri116.html on line 270: Don Rigoberto is, by far, the novel's most interesting character, not because he is especially complex but because Vargas Llosa relishes in his quirks and describes them in titillating detail, creating what Anthony Burgess calls "the pornography of hygiene."
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 281: Joo olen muistavinani että tää snobistinen pornotaidepornokyhhäys oli joxeenkin haukotuttava. Kansikuvastakin mulla oli joku huomautus. Toi hanhennäköinen naishenkilö oli joteskin pedofiilinen. Liittyikö tää huomio jotenkin Ball-sackin huumoripläjäyxeen "Leikillisiä tarinoita", joka on salaperäisesti hukkunut? No mun muisti on jo samanlainen kuin Seijan, se kexii ize juttuja.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 293: As a child, Vargas Llosa was led to believe that his father had died—his mother and her family did not want to explain that his parents had separated. During the government of Peruvian President José Bustamante y Rivero, Vargas Llosa's maternal grandfather obtained a diplomatic post in the northern Peruvian coastal city of Piura and the entire family returned to Peru.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 320: As of 2015, Vargas Llosa is in a relationship with Filipina Spanish socialite and TV personality Isabel Preysler and seeking a divorce from Patricia Llosa. He is an agnostic, "I was not a believer, nor was I an atheist either, but, rather, an agnostic". Se on turmellut moraalinsa asteittain pienillä pelkuruudesta johtuvilla myönnytyksillä.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 330: García Márquez opiskeli aluksi lakia. Kirjoittaminen oli hänestä kuitenkin kiinnostavampaa, ja niinpä hän keskeytti lakiopinnot ja alkoi työskennellä sanomalehtitoimittajana. Lehtityö vei García Márquezin Eurooppaan. Palattuaan hän meni naimisiin Mercedes Barcha Pardon kanssa.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 365: Esim usein korostetaan ettei lasta saa arvostella ihmisenä, pitää arvostella vain sen tekoja. Ja seuraavassa neuvokissa sanotaan, että lapsesta pitää välittää sellaisena kuin se on, eikä arvostella sitä tekojensa perusteella. Oravat puhuvat ristiin, eikö teistäkin? Kai tää tarkoittaa, että sitä pitää rakastaa teki se mitä tahansa, mutta vihata sen sen tekoja ja tekemättä jättämisiä. Muzitten siihen säntää joku existentialisti ja sanoo että ei meillä ole mitään esanssia, olemme vaan valintojen summia. Hahaa! Eli ihan sama kumpaa me arvostellaan, häiskää izeään vai sen tekoja, sak samma, same difference.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 395: Bienenfeld may be an extreme example, but she’s not atypical. Sartre tended to treat younger romantic prospects (all of whom were female) more as conquests than partners, spending months or years persuading them to get into bed with him and then bouncing off to regale “the Beaver” with details.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 480: Täti oli kauhea, ei vihainen, senhän voi ymmärtää, hän oli vain jäätävän kylmä ja ironinen. Mitä on ironinen, kysyi muumipeikko. No, kuvittele että liukastut limanuljaskaan ja istahdat istumaan keskelle puhdistettuja sieniä. Tietenkin odotat äitisi suuttuvan, se olisi luonnollista. Mutta ehei, hänpä ei suutukaan, katsoo vain musertavasti ja sanoo: "Ymmärrän kyllä että tuo on sinun käsityxesi tanssimisesta, mutta olisin kiitollinen ellet tanssisi ruuassa." Suunnilleen sallaista on ironia. Hyi miten epämiellyttävää, sanoi muumipeikko. Täti oli ironinen aamusta iltaan. Lopulta lapsen ääriviivat hämärtyivät ja hän muuttui näkymättömäxi. Viime perjantaina häntä ei näkynyt enää ollenkaan. Täti antoi hänet minulle ja sanoi, ettei hän todellakaan voi huolehtia sukulaisista, joita hän ei edes näe. Sitä sanotaan dissosiaatioxi.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 511: Sanotaan että parisuhde on 2n kauppa, mutta narsistin suhteessa parisuhde on 1n valta. Narsistin jäykkä tarve olla kaikessa parempi kuin muut nousee pitkässä juoxussa parisuhteen ongelmaxi, sillä narsisti kilpailee myös aina puolisoa vastaan. Narsisti voi olla kateellinen siipalleen jos tämä vaikka heittää tikkaa tarkemmin. Narsisti voi tehdä hirveän numeron vaikka siipan kärryyn unohtamasta Lidl-kaupan sinisestä kolikonnäköisestä kärryrahasta. Narsisti on kuin pieni tytön pillukka, välillä ihmeen kiltti Dr.Jekyll, välillä kamala Mr.Hyde.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 520: Meillä kiusattiin aivan vitusti. Sitä sanottiin mm. härkkimisexi. Kiusaaminen on sitä ettei toista apinaa hyväxytä. Kiusaamisella pyritään saamaan kiusattu henkilö voimaan pahoin. Kiusaaminen ilmenee joko verbaalisena, eleisenä tai fyysisenä häirintänä ja on luonteeltaan aggressiivista. Kun Pezku sekosi mä tunsin voimakasta syyllisyyttä siitä että mä olin aiheuttanut sen kiusaamalla sitä liiaxi. Ehkä olinkin. No ei kai nyt sentään. Hemmetti. Petti täällon hyttynen! Tule heittämään sitä vilttitossulla!
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 522: Kiusaamista esiintyy yleisimmin silloin, kun orjilla ja herroilla on huonot välit ja tyytyväisyys herroihin on vähäistä, työ on ikävää, organisaatio on muuttunut, ilmapiiri sallii kiusaamisen ja orjien välit ovat huonot. Hierarkinen valtarakenne ja autoritäärinen johtaminen altistavat häirinnälle. Kiusaamista on eniten julkisella sektorilla, sexuaalista häirintää elokuva-alalla ja puolustusvoimissa. Se on väkivaltaa, ja väkivalta on lisäväkivallalla rangaistava teko. Tulehduxen alkusyy on yleensä narsistinen pomo.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 64: No, Freud was rong! Many basic tenets of Freud’s theory have been completely disproved. To name several: Psychosexual stages. The Oedipal complex. Belief that repressed memories from the first year of life can be unearthed. Sexual fantasy about intercourse with a parent is responsible for hysteria. Even more damning, his methods and procedures cannot be called scientific, his evidence lacks scientific credibility, and what is offered as evidence was sometimes fudged, if not outright fabricated. Not surprisingly, Freud is absented from contemporary psychological pedagogy, theory, and research. Claiming, “Freud is right!” is akin to shouting, “Long live the king!”; historical curiosities, both.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 66: Key features of Freud’s theory, in addition to being wrong, are repugnant to modern sensibilities. Misogynist perspectives are integral to the theory and to the man. To name but a few of the more egregious: Penis envy. The moral inferiority of woman. Only psychosexually mature women can achieve vaginal orgasm, while orgasm by clitoral stimulation is evidence of stunted development. “Women oppose change, receive passively, and add nothing of their own.”
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 72: Reason is a weak voice, easily overwhelmed by our desires, or employed, along with various other means, as a defense to protect us from awareness of the real, base motives that drive our thoughts and actions. This is Freud’s foundational vision of the human psyche. It is unflattering, if not repugnant, and basically Wright.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 93: It is not like other feelings.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 98: One religion or another—
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 100: One fatherland or another—
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 121: You cannot deny the inspiring pathos of ruins
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 210: Valiokunta pitää pääjohtajan toimintatapaa matkustusasioiden hoitamisessa huolimattomana, viraston omia sekä Palkeiden voimavaroja kuormittavana ja katsoo sen myös osoittavan jonkinasteista välinpitämättömyyttä noudattaa koko henkilöstöä sitovia menettelytapoja. Valiokunta ei pidä veronmaksajien rahojen käyttöä pääjohtajan kampaamo- ja stailauspalveluihin hyvää harkintaa osoittavana, vaikkakin tämä mahdollisuus tietyissä tapauksissa on myöhemmin annettu viestintäpäällikön hyväksynnällä koko henkilöstölle ja kirjattu viestintäpalveluiden projektisuunnitelmaan. Valiokunta painottaa ylimmän johdon toiminnan esimerkillisyyttä organisaation toimintakulttuurille.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 225: As Hester looks out over the crowd, she notices a small, misshapen man and recognizes him as her long-lost husband, who has been presumed lost at sea. When the husband sees Hester's shame, he asks a man in the crowd about her and is told the story of his wife's adultery. He angrily exclaims that the child's father, the partner in the adulterous act, should also be punished and vows to find the man. He chooses a new name, Roger Chillingworth, to aid him in his plan.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 227: The Reverend John Wilson and the minister of Hester's church, Arthur Dimmesdale, question her, but she refuses to name her lover. After she returns to her prison cell, the jailer brings in Chillingworth, now a physician, to calm Hester and her child with his roots and herbs. He and Hester have an open conversation regarding their marriage and the fact that they were both in the wrong. Her lover, however, is another matter and he demands to know who it is; Hester refuses to divulge such information. He accepts this, stating that he will find out anyway, and forces her to conceal that he is her husband. If she ever reveals him, he warns her, he will destroy the child's father. Hester agrees to Chillingworth's terms although she suspects she will regret it.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 229: Following her release from prison, Hester settles in a cottage at the edge of town and earns a meager living with her needlework, which is of extraordinary quality. She lives a quiet, somber life with her daughter, Pearl, and performs acts of charity for the poor. She is troubled by her daughter's unusual fascination with the scarlet "A". The shunning of Hester also extends to Pearl, who has no playmates or friends except her mother. As she grows older, Pearl becomes capricious and unruly. Her conduct starts rumors, and, not surprisingly, the church members suggest Pearl be taken away from Hester.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 235: Tormented by his guilty conscience, Dimmesdale goes to the square where Hester was punished years earlier. Climbing the scaffold in the dead of night, he admits his guilt but cannot find the courage to do so publicly in the light of day. Hester, shocked by Dimmesdale's deterioration, decides to obtain a release from her vow of silence to her husband.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 247: Palvelukeskuksen lakisääteisen tehtävänsä mukaisesti antamat suositukset eivät kuitenkaan ole velvoittavia, ja kukin valtion virasto tai laitos päättää lopulta itsenäisesti menojen hyväksymisestä. Tarkastusvirastossa kyseiset menot onkin palvelukeskuksen suosituksesta huolimatta hyväksytty. Tarkastusvirastossa on myös asiaan liittyen laadittu vuonna 2019 ohjeistus, jonka mukaan kampaamo- ja stailauspalveluita voidaan maksaa viraston toimintamenoista viestintäpäällikön harkinnan mukaan.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 251: Valiokunta toteaa, että tarkastusviraston pääjohtajan matkasuunnitelmien sekä matka- ja kululaskujen hyväksyntä on käytännössä aina pääjohtajan alaisella. Vastaava tilanne on muissakin päällikkövirastoissa valtionhallinnossa. Tarkastusvirastolla ei kuitenkaan ole ohjaavaa ministeriötä kuten muilla päällikkövirastoilla. Niin sanotulla yksi yli yhden -periaatteen noudattamisella voidaan turvata hyvän hallintotavan noudattaminen. Tämä tarkoittaa päätöksen hyväksyttämistä päätöksen tekevän henkilön esimiehellä. Valtion virastojen ja laitosten ylimmän johdon yläpuolella ei kuitenkaan ole tahoa, jolle tämän tehtävän voisi osoittaa. Valiokunta edellyttää, että hallitus ryhtyy toimenpiteisiin ja selvittää, kuinka niin sanotun yksi yli yhden -periaatteen toteutumista voidaan edistää koko valtionhallinnossa. Valiokunta pitää tärkeänä selvittää menettelytapaa, jolla sisäisen tarkastuksen ja myös Valtion talous- ja henkilöstöhallinnon palvelukeskuksen havaitsemista, valtion viraston tai laitoksen ylintä johtoa koskevista epäkohdista voitaisiin ilmoittaa kyseisen viraston tai laitoksen operatiivisesta johdosta riippumattomalle taholle. Myös ulkoisen tarkastajan tiedonsaannista tulee tässä yhteydessä huolehtia.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 255: Pääjohtajan matkasuunnitelmien ja matkalaskujen osalta erityistarkastuksen havainnot ovat pääosin samoja kuin valiokunnan saamissa asiantuntijalausunnoissa ja valiokunnalle toimitetussa aineistossa esitetyt huomiot. Viraston matkustusohjeen mukaan matkasuunnitelmaan tulee kirjata työmatkasta aiheutuvat kustannukset. Pääjohtajan matkasuunnitelmat sisältävät vain matkasta aiheutuvat päivärahat. Pääjohtajan matkasuunnitelmat ovat siten puutteelliset kulujen esittämisen osalta ja ovat selkeästi viraston matkustusohjeistuksen vastaisia. Matkasuunnitelmien hyväksymisessä esiintyi viivettä, ja matkasuunnitelmia on lähetetty hyväksyttäväksi muun muassa matkustuspäivää edeltävänä päivänä. Lisäksi pääjohtajan matkalaskujen liitetiedoista puuttuu tositteita.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 280: Silläkin uhalla että vaikutan kiittämättömältä (mitä olenkin), on sanottava
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 333: Perhe Trofonios oli poika Erginus kuninkaan Minyan Orchomenus ja veli Agamedes . Mutta Apollon sanotaan olevan hänen jumalallinen isänsä.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 353: In Petronius's Satyricon, Trimalchus (pro Trimalchio) finds her shriveled to a tiny lump and kept alive in a jar. He asks her, "Sibyl, what do you want?" (in Greek, Σίβυλλα τί θέλεις; pronounced more or less "Sibylla, ti theleis"). She replies, "I want to die" (in Greek, ἀποθανεῖν θέλω, pronounced "apothanein thelo"). I learned this, as you did, not from reading the Satyricon, but from beating T S Eliot's The Waste Land to death in my English Lit class.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 359: "Nam Sibyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla pendere, et cum illi pueri dicerent: Sibylla ti theleis; respondebat illa: apothanein thelo." I. THE BURIAL OF THE DEAD April is the cruellest month, breeding Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing Memory and desire, stirring Dull roots with spring rain. Winter kept us warm, covering Earth in forgetful snow, feeding A little life with dried tubers. Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade, And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten, 10 And drank coffee, and talked for an hour. Bin gar keine Russin, stamm’ aus Litauen, echt deutsch. And when we were children, staying at the archduke’s, My cousin’s, he took me out on a sled, And I was frightened. He said, Marie, Marie, hold on tight. And down we went. In the mountains, there you feel free. I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter. What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, 20 You cannot say, or guess, for you know only A heap of broken images, where the sun beats, And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief, And the dry stone no sound of water. Only There is shadow under this red rock, (Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust. 30 Frisch weht der Wind Der Heimat zu Mein Irisch Kind, Wo weilest du? "You gave me hyacinths first a year ago; "They called me the hyacinth girl." - Yet when we came back, late, from the Hyacinth garden, Your arms full, and your hair wet, I could not Speak, and my eyes failed, I was neither Living nor dead, and I knew nothing, 40 Looking into the heart of light, the silence. Öd’ und leer das Meer.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 388: Lapsuudessaan hän joutui kokemaan vuoden 1918 sodan Tampereen valtauksen, mikä näkyi vasuripainotuksena hänen tuotannossaan. Kajavan perhe asui Viljon lapsuudessa Kaakinmaan kaupunginosassa.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 394: Kajava oli hyvin tuottelias kirjoittaja ja vielä 87-vuotiaana hän julkaisi runokokoelman ”Vielä piirrän viivan”, ei sentään 150 jambista viivaa kuten pseudo-Dikaiarkhos teoxeen "hellaan vaan muistiinpanot", joka (ensinmainittu) ilmestyi vuonna 1996. Siinä oli teemana entiseen tapaan vasurismin lisäksi luonto, meri ja rakkaus.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 44: Lapset ovat luontojaan hartaita: ne kuuntelevat satuja erottamatta niitä todesta. Ne eivät pilkkaa sadun kertojaa ja epäile sen motiiveja, vaan kuuntelevat henkeä pidättävän hartaina. Eli kerro niille satuja joita ize pidät totena, ei muuta tarvita. Mitä aikaisemmin aloitat sitä paremmin ne tehoaa. Lapset oppii matkimalla, ne kopioivat vanhemmilta paizi tietoa myös asenteita arvoja ja tunteita. Ei ne mitään opetusta tarvize, vaan varhaiskasvatusta esimerkillä ja näyttämällä mallia. Kaikki uppoo niihin niinkuin häkä. Toiminta, tunteet, aistihavainnot, keholliset kokemuxet ja ajattelu yhdistyvät, hyvin on lapsen vakaumuskasvaminen kokonaisvaltaista.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 64: Hanna Rothman jakoi köyhien kotien lapsille Fröbelin palikat. Pestalozzi-kylästä, jonne CEC antoi charityä. Hannan ja sen kaverin elämää säväytti vahva kristillinen vakaumus. Lastentarhatoiminnan pohjana oli kristillinen etikka. Kasvatuxessa painotettiin eritoten lähimmäisen rakkautta ja kiitollisuutta tädeille. Tavoitteena oli luoda luottamus jumalan huolenpitoon viimeistään ison kiven takana. Kristillistä pohjaa pidettiin izestään selviönä aina 60-luvulle saakka. 1979 mietinnössä sanotaan että uskonnollisen vakaumuxen tukemisessa on kunnioitettava lasten vanhempien tai huoltajien vakaumusta. Mutta lapsen pitää saada tilaisuus hiljentyä ja vastauxia uskonnollisiin kysymyxiinsä. Päiväkodeissa onkin aika meteli. Päikkkäreillä hiljennytään rukousmatolle. Tarhatädit oli aivan ulalla. Onko Allah ainoa, vai onko kolminaisuus oikea? Onnexi mamuja oli suht vähän vielä 80-luvulla.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 72: Varhaiskasvatuxen kazomuskasvatuxessa yhteisen tutustumisen kohteena ovat lapsiryhmässä läsnä olevat uskonnot ja muut kazomuxet. Uskonnottomuutta tarkastellaan muiden kazomusten rinnalla. Lasten ihmettelylle annetaan tilaa (se suuntautuu nyt muiden kummiin tapoihin) ja heidän kanssaan pohditaan heitä askarruttavia elämänkysymyxiä, kuten esim. minne joudumme kun kuolemme. Tässä tehdään yhteistyötä huoltajien kanssa: sinä Pekko maadut maaxi, sinä Jasmin joudut käytöxestä riippuen taivaaseen tai helvettiin, sillä teidän suunnitelmissanne lukee niin.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 97: Kazomuxen käsite voidaan eri kazomuxissa määritellä eri tavoin, mutta se viittaa erilaisiin uskonnollisiin ja uskonnottomiin koko maailmaa koskeviin näkemyxiin ja elämäntapoihin. Jokaisella apinalla on maailmankazomus, vaikka pienikin. Mitä on, mitä siitä voidaan tietää, ja hyväkö se on vaiko paha. Se voi olla luonteeltaan joko yhteisöllinen tai yxilöllinen. Päiväkotihenkilöstön täytyy tulla tietoisexi omastaan ja ymmärtää, että se voi asiakkaan mielestä olla aivan perseestä. Kazomuskasvatuxen läpikäyneen täytyy hyväxyä tää: toiset voivat olla kazomuxellisesti täysin väärässä muttei niitä siltikään saa tappaa eikä kivittää. Vaikka oma kazomus määräisikin niin. Kas tässä on tän homman villakoiran ydin: ei voi samaan aikaan uskoa ja myöntää että toisten usko voi olla oikea. The cat is on the mat but I don't believe it.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 100: Tällä hetkellä noin 2/3 kuuluu luterilaiseen kirkkoon, mutta uskonnottomien määrä kasvaa jatkuvasti. Uskonnollinen kotikasvatus katoaa kuin pieru Saharaan. Tämä asettaa suuria haasteita kazomuskasvatuxelle. Kazomuskasvatuxella voi lasta muokata, niin että se joskus vanhempana hurahtaa, vaikkei saakaan enää sanoa nimenomaan mihin.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 223: Surmailta on ollut kaoottinen, ja todistajanlausunnot ovat ristiriitaisia. Monia todistajia kuultiin vasta, kun surmasta oli kulunut useita kuukausia. Epäselvyyttä lisää sekin, että eräs ruotsalainen vapaaehtoinen on myöhemmin kertonut ampuneensa Toivo Kuulan, koska Kuula pilkkasi ruotsalaisia. Tämän Alm-nimisen sotilaan tunnustuksesta kerrotaan Tuomi Elmgren-Heinosen kirjoittamassa Toivo Kuulan elämäkerrassa.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 242: Isoisänsä elämäntyön ja klassisen musiikin Marttinen löysi uudelleen opiskellessaan yliopistossa. Nykyään hän toimii Toivo Kuula -seuran sihteerinä. Hän on kuullut vapun 1918 tapahtumista monenlaisia huhuja ja tarinoita. Yllättävin yhteydenotto tuli, kun Marttinen oli 15-vuotias. Hän oli yksin kotona Helsingissä, kun puhelin soi.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 245: Juhani Heikka on ilahtunut siitä, kuinka rauhallisesti ja kohteliaasti Marttinen häneen suhtautui heti puhelimessa. Etukäteen Heikka oli miettinyt, että vastaanotto voisi olla tylykin.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 247: Marttinen puolestaan on otettu Heikan yhteydenotosta.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 282: Käsineidistä Peggy sanoo: "There's a precedent in real life for everything in the book. I decided not to put anything in that somebody
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 284: Regarding her stints with teaching, she has noted, "Success for me meant no longer having to teach at university."
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 304: After graduating in English from the University of Toronto, the young poet— she was by now publishing in Canadian literary magazines—enrolled in graduate school at Radcliffe, the all-female women university at Harvard, in 1961. She was chagrined by the intensely chauvinistic atmosphere: among other things, female students were not allowed access to the university’s modern poetry collection in the Lamont Library. Only men could read all the juicy bits.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 308: In the early 70s, Atwood added considerably to her work as a teacher and writer by editing manuscripts for the cutting-edge nationalist publisher The House of Anansi. By then, her marriage to Polk was over (Sullivan is vague about why, offering mainly generalities about the difficulty of staying together in that morally freewheeling era. Fact is, Jim Polk was not enough of a handyman for manly Margaret.) In 1972, Atwood met Gibson, a novelist and cultural activist whose own marriage was crumbling. The two began an affair, meeting at first clandestinely in the basement office of Toronto’s Longhouse Bookshop, but soon living together—for several years on a working farm north of the city.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 336: Atwood has not won the Nobel (this was written 1998), at least not yet. But the petite 58-year-old novelist (Cat’s Eye, Alias Grace) and poet (Power Politics, Morning in the Burned House) has become internationally famous on a scale no Canadian writer of serious literature ever has. She is, in her own words, “one of the few literary writers who has gotten lucky”—which means she is read not just by intellectuals, but by hairdressers, chartered accountants and farmers. Easy reading, straightforward sentiments.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 344: Sullivan rightly traces Atwood’s notable self-confidence to those early years, but she also ignores the hints in her own narrative that Atwood’s family, like any other, had its neurotic tics—and that Atwood certainly carried her own share of psychic stress into adulthood. Where else does the buried grief, anger and sense of calamity in her writing come from?
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 349: Voi vittu, vessa tukkeutui kun Gileadin tädit ei muka olleet kexineet antaa vessakävijöille vaan 1 paperia pienelle ja 3 isolle hädälle. Typerää, olihan Kanadassa ryssämamuja (esim Belovit), oishan ne osanneet neuvoa. Ja paperit on tuotava takasin ja ne pannaan rodeen haisemaan, kärpäset pörrää ympärillä kiekuraa. Ryssissä oli paljon tätejä, huonot eläkkeet kuten jenkeissä. Ja huonot viemärit.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 356: Mikä muu on toisin? No June on 168 cm eli 5´6´´ hilkka päässä ja kassi kädessä, 2 tuumaa pitempi kuin Peggy ja 3 tuumaa pitempi kuin Elizabeth Moss. Sen tukka on ruskea pro blondattu, Aunt Lydia ei ole luiseva ja kulmikas kuten kirjassa vaan amerikkalaisittain small fat kokoa. Serena Joy ei ole vanha kääkkänä vaan paljon Junea näyttävämpi tshekkikaunotar. Commander Fred Waterford on kirjassa harmaaselkä eikä yhtä luikero kuin leffan irkku hipsterwiixi rajajooseppi.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 360: Käsineiti (1985) on kirjoitettu samoihin aikoihin kuin Maare Tammin Lasten ja nuorten uskonnollinen maailma (1988), jonka sain ilmaisexi Sysmän kirjakyläpäiviltä. HBO:n sarja (2016)on samaa nykyaikaa kuin Lastenkokoinen kazomuskasvatus (2020). Käsineiti-kirjan Soul Roll -rukousmyllystä voi valita 5 aiheen joukosta: rikkaus, terveys, syntymä, kuolema, ja synti. Aiheittain kuin virsikirjan lisälehdet: synti, ahdischtus. Tammin kirjan luvussa Pikkulapset ja rukous mainitaan Pyyntörukous, Kiitosrukous, Tunnustusrukous, Sairaus ja muu vaara -rukouxet, Altruistiset rukouxet, Rituaaliset rukouxet, ja Vastausta vaille jääneet rukouxet. Tää viimeinen ei ole oma laji, vaan sisältää kaikki edelliset. Jo hyvin aikaisin lapsi oivaltaa, että kaikkiin rukouxiin ei vastata. 4-5 vuotiaana lapsi uskoo että taivaan iskä unohti kun sillä on niin paljon töitä. 6-7 vuotiaat ovat hyvin vihaisia ja lakkaavat uskomasta koko pelleen. (Mä olin muistaaxeni 9v.) Noin 8-9 vuotiaina lapset uskovat, että niiden rukouxet oli huonoja. Rukoile paremmin. Tapahtukoon sinun tahtosi eikä minun. Vittu tietysti, mixi siis edes vaivautua. Käsineidin porukat on uskonnollisesti kehittymättömämpiä kuin Tammin lapsoset. Myllyissä ei ole kuin pyyntö- sairaus- ja muu vaara -rukouxia. Tammin kakarat on täysinoppineita teologeja, tai Maare Tamm on ainakin. Hengellisesti kypsälle ihmiselle rukous on vaan elämän kolhujen nöyrää vastaanottamista ja kiitollisuutta siitä mitä annetaan. Herra antoi, herra otti, kiitetty olkoon herran nimi. Ottaa antaa, kanankakan kantaa. Lastenkokoisessa ei rukouxia enää pidetä, on vaan aamunavauxia. Heräjä, mixi nukut herra? (Psalmi 44:24).
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 388: * Coming on her face, or if not her face, maybe on her stomach, breasts, or back.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 389: (Come anywhere but not in there, that's not safe.)
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 404: Meidät pakotetaan tappamaan. Paskanmarjat, se on oma valinta. Peg puhuu potaskaa kuin Piki, toinen vastuunpakoilija. No ei pakoilussa mitään, syyn lykkääminen muille se on vittumaista. Meitä käskettiin, mun ei annettu. Joku toinen apina on ollut pahantahtoinen. Se ei ole minun vikani. Tänä yönä luen rukouxeni ja sitten pyllistän saföörille. Käsineitien pyllistyxissä on tiettyä anglosaxisuutta kuten jalkapallofaneissa. Paras mies voittakoon. Wembleyn solvausade yllätti italiaanot.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 482: Bring a Bible. A penis nice to have but not a must (we have them on store), and a Hewlett Packard notebook so you can capture whatever God speaks to your heart. Bring cash. And some shit for my fly.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 499: Make sure you stay in the loop when it comes to news about Harmageddon. To sign up for notifications, click here. Coming soon in your neighborhood! Yours sincerely,
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 544: No mikä oli Peggyn jälkisäädösten vastaanotto? Oliko perillisten tukat turhaan suitut? Ainakaan ei ole suomenkielistä wikisivua. Suomentaja on sentään nainen. Kertojana on tällä kertaa Lydia. Osoittautuu yllätyxexi että Number Two eli Lydia onkin salaa hyvis. Karjapiikillä pistely ja telotuxet olikin vain hämäystä. Se sattui Lydiaan enemmän kuin Juneen. Ei voi tehdä omelettia särkemättä munia.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 283: kunnioituksella, tämä taitaa olla pohjanoteeraus.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 787: Left tormented and in isolation, the innocent creature turns on his creator in this eloquent Gothic thriller, which touches the hearts of readers with its messages of the dangers of science and human judgment. This helps appreciate pro life ideas: do not meddle with what belongs to Mighty Mouse territory.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 796: In their early 20s the pair vacationed together on Lake Garda on the Austrian-Italian border; they paid their respects at Goethe’s house in Weimar; stayed together at the Hotel Belvedere au Lac in Lugano, Switzerland; and even visited brothels together in Prague, Milan, Leipzig, and Paris. Brod, a self-confessed ladies’ man with an insatiable appetite for adventurous sexual conquests, often berated Kafka for not having a similarly urgent drive of eros. “You avoid women and try to live without them,” Brod once told his friend.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 808: With characters that are semi-autobiographical, O'Brien creates a style that blurs fiction and non-fiction. Vietnam was not so bad after all, what doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 874: The two rekindle their relationship as they discuss life lessons, which he finds will make a world of a difference in his own life. Another never heard, probably for a very good reason too.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 886: The book was later adapted in a film by Stanley Kubrick, which was first released in 1971. The film was a piece of shit at least, never read the book. Another booboo tale against the Russkies. Totally obsolete.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 909: Along the way, his answer becomes that we pay too little attention to successful people's upbringing. He explains everything from the fascinating secrets of some of software's billionaires to the qualities that made the Beatles so iconic. This is sure to be a huge pile of shit, another stupid try to justify of the fucking "I am my own life's hero" philosophy.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 938: Concern for others complicates the simple logic of self-preservation, and creates its own Catch-22: life is not worth living without the well-being of others, but the well-being of others endangers one’s life. Ergo self preservation sucks. So does war, for whatever cause.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 942: Another book by Orwell, 'Animal Farm' is a brilliant political satire on corrupted ideals, revolutions, and class conflicts that stretch back to the Stalin era of the Soviet Union.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1061: Ken (not quite heteronormal, super dumb dyed blonde,
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1073: Barbiet on sikahalpoja mutta noi Bartleby essayt on aika kalliita. I'd rather not. Enpä taida ostaa esseetä. Mieluummin en.
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1194: Human Barbie Valeria Lukyanova caused controversy when she expressed support of Russia during the War in Donbas. She wrote, after posing in the Crimea region: "Do not give up! fight! Our grandfathers fought with bare hands against the fascists! Do not disgrace the honour of the Great Warrior! Be aware that Russia is always with you!" In 2022, she criticised the sanctions imposed on Russia as a result of the Russian-Ukrainian War and said that those sanctions would hurt models who couldn't compete in international organisations like Nato. Like her namesake Klaus, she is against racial mixing. "I am Nordic type, I have light skin, blonded hair and blue contact lenses, and I like it. So do you, judging from the bulge in your pants."
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1198: Lukyanova has expressed anger at the nickname of "Human Barbie", as she feels that it's "a little degrading and insulting" but that she's used to it now as it's the image her fans "requested" so she has to "comply with it because it's become part of my aesthetic image. "But I don't the 'human' part. And the Barbie doll is not Russian but Canadian."
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1205: "Those who are unsatisfied with what I do and critique me and offend me clearly don't have the same figure as I do," she said. "Otherwise they would not be so negative. They are openly jealous."
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 1206: Lukyanova is starkly against having children herself. "The very idea of having children brings out this deep revulsion in me." "It's not what being classy is all about. It's not about men or kids."
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 239: Cinnpie´s response comes after a prolonged silence on Twitter. She added a letter from her lawyers to her statement, a cease and desist to all the defamatory comments online. Creampie acknowledges that "I was an irresponsible, inappropriate, and immature 23 year old in 2016… and I deserve all of this. Sitä saa mitä tilaa. I may be a pussy pedophile, but I am not evil. I am not a crook. All I care ab is my favorite games & making my friends laugh." LOL
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 243: Turun päivälautan peräkannella pieni ryhmä nelikymppistä Seija Laine -kaliiberin rupusakkia puhuu äänekkäästi rumia mm. takaapäin panosta, suihinotosta sekä pillun nuolennasta. Tyylilaji on ilmeisesti normikamaa Tinderissä ja muissa vonkauspaikoissa. Laahus kuulostaa aina samalta ja sanoo samat asiat joka kerta prikulleen samalla tavalla. Niin tekevät toisaalta myös hyvin menestyneet oman elämänsä sepot. Viestejä miehiltä. Naiset vastaavat ymmärrettävästi naamat norsun vitulla. Apinat.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 335: Rullakaupalla kehitettyjä valokuvia pinottuina toisissaan kiinni oleviin pinkkoihin.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 372: Weinreb grew up in Scheveningen, Netherlands, to which his family had moved in 1916, and became notorious for selling a fictitious escape route for Jews from the occupied Netherlands in the Second World War. When his scheme fell apart in 1944, he left his home in Scheveningen and went into hiding in Ede. He was imprisoned for 3½ years after the war for fraud as well as collaboration with the German occupier. In his memoirs, published in 1969 he maintained that his plans were to give Jews hope for survival and that he had assumed that the liberation of the Netherlands would take place before his customers were deported. The debate about his guilt or innocence—called the “Weinreb affair”—was very heated in the Netherlands in the 1970s, involving noted writers like Renate Rubinstein and Willem Frederik Hermans. In an attempt to end this debate, the government asked the Rijksinstituut Oorlogsdocumentatie (Netherlands institute for war documentation) to investigate the matter. in 1976 the institute issued a report (of which a part already was leaked to the press in 1973), which determined that his memoirs were "a collection of lies and fantasies," and that his collaboration had caused 70 deaths. Although his activities did contribute to some Jews' survival, most Jews who fell for Weinreb's swindle were deported and killed.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 376: Even after his death in 1988 the discussion about Weinreb in the Netherlands has not come to an end. In a Dutch biography by Regina Grüter published in 1997, Een fantast schrijft geschiedenis, Weinreb was depicted as a sufferer from pseudologia fantastica. se oli mytomaani toisin sanoen!
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 496: Gill: Let me see if I can get this up... Yeah, that is great. (Euan: sorry to interrupt TV mama but you stopped sharing your screen ...).. Sorry I'm not very good at this. This is difficult, people. - Wait, I'm sorted, just counted backwards to seven. Can y´all see my screen now?
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 511: Make excuses for not doing as told Make no excuses but do as told
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 536: huomioon toisetkin. Jenkit ei tee niin, niistä on otettava mallia! Looking out for N:o 1! Loppupeleissä voi olla paras vaan passiivis-aggressiivisesti vaihtaa puheenaihetta. Jos sä valitat mulle et esim mun tukka on sekasin, se on sun ongelma! On assertiivista kysyä mitä mun muka pitäs tehä sille (ei kuiteskaan lolitamaisesti tälläsellä teiniäänellä). Hienotunteisuus ei ole jämäkkää, eikä me jämäkät olla hienotunteisia. Me ollaan selväsanaisia.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 563: The difference between a rule and a principle is that one is merely a guideline that follows from the other. Principles don’t break. They’re universal. Gravity is a principle. Whether it’s you who falls from a skyscraper, your cat, or a 17th century vase, it’s not gonna end well. Gravity makes no exceptions.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 567: In the ten years since I wrote them down, I have broken every single one of my rules. And yet, I’m still glad I wrote that list. You know why? Because the idea that I wanted to live by some rules — despite not knowing which ones or how or why — was enough.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 599: Bill Gates says the worst day in his life was the day his mother died. It’s a simple reminder that we all have regrets. Another bad day was when his wife caught him astride his secretary.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 615: Most of our scars come from wounds inflicted by other people (see rule 6). Words can hurt us more than weapons. But it’s not your job to imagine what arrows people might point at you inside their heads. The majority will never fire. What you think of them they could care less.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 619: Instead of taking shots at others, most people decide to draw up — and lose at — another imagined game: Who’s better? It’s a moot question. We have no idea what anyone’s story is like up to the page on which we meet them.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 626:

5. Stop thinking so much, it’s alright not to know the answers.

xxx/ellauri123.html on line 628: If you’re not supposed to think about others, nor what they think, what are you supposed to mull over? Yourself? Actually, it’s fine to not think so much at all. Answers often come to you when you least expect it. You are probably too stupid anyway, if you hang around this self-help page.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 636: We spend all this time looking for something we can’t see because it’s not there. The outside world is only as good as what you do with everything that happens in it. Are you cultivating your experiences? Cherishing them?
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 638: If not, it’s not fuel or oxygen that’s missing. Only you can refill that fire hose because it rests limp inside your Calvin Kleins. Choose to fondle that lame thing. Erect it. Hold it tight. And let it shine for everyone to see.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 647: There is someone on this planet literally dying to smile. Yet here we are, you and I, walking around, often choosing not to extend this simple, near-automatic gesture to uplift our fellow human beings.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 649: Whatever problems plague you in your day-to-day life, chances are, they’re not all that important in the grand scheme of things. In fact you are not worth a shit in the grand scheme of things. We each have our own challenges, but as long as you can smile, do it. Who knows who you’ll infect. If you´re lucky you got Corona.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 657: Showpainilla on tiettyjä yhtymäkohtia 1500–1700-luvuilla suosittuun Commedia dell'arteen. Klovni mätkii pampulla olkiukkoa, dominot kaatuu pajazo tyhjenee. Nykyaikaisessa, viihteellisessä ammattipainissa, tällaisia ovat muun muassa tarinankerronnalliset elementit, karakteerien rakentaminen, juonikuviot, haastattelut, sekä ottelijoiden erikois- ja lopetusliikkeet. Suunnitellut tarinan kaaret saattavat kestää joskus vuosiakin. Maailman suurin showpainiyritys, WWE, kutsuukin omaa tuotettaan urheiluviihteeksi (engl. sports entertainment).
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 668: “Friendship should be based on loyalty” is a principle you can aspire to live by, but without the rule of “I never abandon my friends at the last minute,” it doesn’t mean anything. Huh? Because you cannot reason with words of three syllables or more?
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 702: Vladin hobby oli neitoperhosten nappaaja, se haaveili nymfettejä, sanallisesti ainakin. Isolla karvaisella kyrvällään se naulasi niitä näytelaatikoihin. Nykyään sitä sanotaan pedofiliaxi ja sitä pahexutaan. Kiistellään onko silikonisista lapsisexiroboteista apua vaiko enemmänkin haittaa. Humbert Humbert näkee polluutiounia tytöistä joilla on vasta alkamassa menstruaatio. Tytöillä menstruaatio ja pojilla polluutio. Raahab oli portto 10v ikäisenä. Danten Beatrice oli 9v ja Petrarcan Laura 12vee. Tää kuulostaa ihan Jean-Jacquesilta, käkikellomaan tirkistelevältä rusakolta. Poser un lapin.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 716: Nabokov´s wife Véra was his strongest supporter and assisted him throughout his lifetime, but Nabokov admitted to having a "prejudice" against women writers. He wrote to Edmund Wilson, who had been making suggestions for his lectures: "I dislike Jane Austen, and am prejudiced, in fact against all women writers. They are in another class." Although Véra worked as his personal translator and secretary, he made publicly known that his ideal translator would be male, and especially not a "Russian-born female". In the first chapter of Glory he attributes the protagonist's similar prejudice to the impressions made by children's writers like Lidiya Charski, and in the short story "The Admiralty Spire" deplores the posturing, snobbery, antisemitism, and cutesiness he considered characteristic of Russian women authors.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 758: Lolita is a 1955 novel written by Russian-American novelist Vladimir Nabokov. The novel is notable for its controversial subject: the protagonist and unreliable narrator, a French middle-aged literature professor under the pseudonym Humbert Humbert, is obsessed with an American 12-year-old girl, Dolores Haze, whom he sexually molests (fucks) after he becomes her stepfather. "Lolita" is his private nickname for Dolores.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 762: The impassioned Humbert constantly searches for discreet forms of fulfilling his sexual urges, usually via the smallest physical contact with Dolores. When Dolores is sent to summer camp, Humbert receives a letter from Charlotte, who confesses her love for him and gives him an ultimatum – he is to either marry her or move out immediately. Initially terrified, Humbert then begins to see the charm in the situation of being Dolores' stepfather, and so marries Charlotte for instrumental reasons (päästäxeen salaa työntämään Lolan piccu tacoon isoa munakoisoa). Charlotte later discovers Humbert's diary, in which she learns of his desire for her daughter and the disgust Charlotte arouses in him. Shocked and humiliated, Charlotte decides to flee with Dolores and writes letters addressed to her friends warning them of Humbert. Disbelieving Humbert´s false assurance that the diary is a sketch for a future novel, Charlotte runs out of the house to send the letters but is killed by a swerving car. Humbert destroys the letters and retrieves Dolores from camp, claiming that her mother has fallen seriously ill and has been hospitalized. He then takes her to a high-end hotel that Charlotte had earlier recommended. Humbert knows he will feel guilty if he consciously rapes Dolores, and so tricks her into taking a sedative by saying it is a vitamin. As he waits for the pill to take effect, he wanders through the hotel and meets a mysterious man who seems to be aware of Humbert´s plan for Dolores. Humbert excuses himself from the conversation and returns to the hotel room. There, he discovers that he had been fobbed with a milder drug, as Dolores is merely drowsy and wakes up frequently, drifting in and out of sleep. He dares not touch her that night. In the morning, Dolores reveals to Humbert that she actually has already lost her virginity, having engaged in sexual activity with an older boy at a different camp a year ago. He immediately begins sexually abusing (fucking) her. And they lived happily ever after.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 764: Läppä läppä. Deeply depressed, Humbert unexpectedly receives a letter from a 17-year-old Dolores (signing as "Dolly (Mrs. Richard F. Schiller)"), telling him that she is married, pregnant, and in desperate need of money. Humbert, armed with a pistol, tracks down Dolores' address and gives her the money, which was due as an inheritance from her mother. Humbert learns that Dolores' husband, a deaf mechanic, is not her abductor. Dolores reveals to Humbert that Quilty took her from the hospital and that she was in love with him, but she was rejected when she refused to star in one of his pornographic films. Dolores also rejects Humbert's request to leave with him. Humbert goes to the drug-addled Quilty's mansion and shoots him several times. Shortly afterward, Humbert is arrested, and in his closing thoughts, he reaffirms his love for Dolores and asks for his memoir to be withheld from public release until after her death. Dolores dies in childbirth on Christmas Day in 1952, disappointing Humbert´s prediction that "Dolly Schiller will probably survive me by many years."
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 766: Lolita is frequently described as an "erotic novel", not only by some critics but also in a standard reference work on literature Facts on File: Companion to the American Short Story. The Great Soviet Encyclopedia called Lolita "an experiment in combining an erotic novel with an instructive novel of bourgeois bad manners."
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 769: One of the first things Nabokov makes a point of saying is that, despite John Ray Jr.'s claim in the Foreword, there is no moral to the story. Nabokov concludes the afterword with a reference to his beloved first language, which he abandoned as a writer once he moved to the United States in 1940: "My private tragedy, which cannot, and indeed should not, be anybody's concern, is that I had to abandon my natural idiom, my untrammeled, rich, and infinitely docile Russian language for a second-rate brand of English." Alas, that 'wonderful Russian language' which, I imagined, still awaits me somewhere, which blooms like a faithful spring behind the locked gate to which I, after so many years, still possess the key, turned out to be non-existent, and there is nothing beyond that gate, except for some burned out stumps and hopeless autumnal emptiness, and the key in my hand looks rather like a lock pick. Or floppy prick."
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 777: Pierre de Ronsard (syyskuu 1524 Couture-sur-Loir, Vendôme – 27. joulukuuta 1585 La Riche, Centre-Val de Loirelähde?) oli ranskalainen runoilija, joka uudisti maansa runotaidetta.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 781: Kaarlo Sarkian suomentamat runot "Orapihlajalle" ja "Kassandralle" sisältyvät antologiaan Maailmankirjallisuuden kultainen kirja 4, Ranskan kirjallisuuden kultainen kirja (WSOY 1934). "Kassandralle" on myös molemmissa Sarkian kokoelmissa Runot (WSOY 1944 ja WSOY 2008, ISBN 978-951-0-17531-5). Runon "Kassandralle" on suomentanut myös Aale Tynni. Seuraavan runon "Pillulle" on suomentanut näiden rivien kirjoittaja ize.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 879: kosketuxenvaihtojärjestelmää kaunottaren ja
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 883: kaunottaren välillä. Vizi tottakai se huomasi kokispullon Vladin lahkeessa. Eise ollut 1. kertaa pappia kyydissä.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 994: Annabel, is perhaps not unrelated to Byron's
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1010: little. Another Quilty, with his own distinctive hint of sadism. "Sade's Justine
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1027: perhaps there is an almost inaudible note of redemption at Humbert and Lolita's
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1045: Many a true word is spoken in jest, especially about the kinship between eros and thanatos. FUCK! KILL! Puuttuu enää EAT! The two closest glimpses Humbert gives us of his own self-hatred are not without their death wish—made explicit in the closing paragraphs—and their excremental aspects: "I am lanky, big-boned, wooly-chested Humbert Humbert, with thick black eyebrows and a queer accent, and a cesspoolful of rotting monsters behind his slow boyish smile." Two hundred pages later: "The turquoise blue swimming pool some distance behind the lawn was no longer behind that lawn, but within my thorax, and my organs swam in it like excrements in the blue sea water in Nice." And then there's the offhand aside "Since (as the psychotherapist, as well as the rapist, will tell you) the limits and rules of such girlish games are fluid …" in which it takes a moment to notice that "therapist" and "the rapist" are in direct apposition.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1050: connotation of death and extinction, then I
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1051: don't know what is. Arresting, as well as disgusting, to suddenly notice that Lolita (who died giving birth to a stillborn girl, for Christ's sake) would have been 86 this year. … the thought that with patience and luck I might have her produce eventually a nymphet with my blood in her exquisite veins, a Lolita the Second, who would be eight or nine around 1960, when I would still be dans la force d'age; indeed, the telescopy of my mind, or un-mind, was strong enough to distinguish in the remoteness of time a vieillard encore vert—or was it green rot?—bizarre, tender, salivating Dr. Humbert, practicing on supremely lovely Lolita the Third the art of being a granddad.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1114: noted for his investigations into the
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1116: The Annotated Lolita, an edition of
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1121: course from Nabokov. (So did Pynchon tho he cut the class, understanding nothing from Vladi's thick Russki accent. Vladi did not remember Tom's protruding incisors, distracted by the attending Lolitas. Vera recalled Tom's appalling hand.) His education
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1189: Flac, équené, transi, sans force et sans vigueur. Löpsö, voimaton, tunnoton, vailla kuntoa.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1256: A: First off, being a “pedophile” is not per se sinful. Even today, the Church does not condemn pedophiles, nor does it consider pedophilia in and of itself to be sinful. The grave offense and grave sin occurs when a pedophile — or anyone else — commits child sexual assault (such as fucks them). This distinction is vital, both in general, and in understanding where Dante would have placed child sexual abusers in his version of hell.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1263: She made an agreement with me to do a job and then accepted payment, did she not? Never mind if it was in candy.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1275: Christian teaching is that any sin can be forgiven. There is one exception, called the “unpardonable” sin, but that is a subject for another thread; it’s not about pedophilia for murder, but poking fun at the ghost who knocked up Virgin Mary without so much as by your leave.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1277: Self-reported and physiological sexual arousal to adult and pedophilic stimuli were examined among 80 men drawn from a community sample of volunteers. Over ¼ of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equalled or exceeded arousal to adult stimuli. The hypothesis that arousal to pedophilic stimuli is a function of general sexual arousability factors was supported in that pedophilic and adult heterosexual arousal were positively correlated, particularly in the physiological data. Subjects who were highly arousable, insofar as they were unable to voluntarily and completely inhibit their sexual arousal, were more sexually aroused by all stimuli than were subjects who were able to inhibit their sexual arousal. Thus, arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily correspond with pedophilic behavior.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 92: Descartes melkein sanoi muttei hirvinnyt että apinakin on vaan kone, jossa on lähinnä parfyymina jotain sielunhajua. Joku toinen 1700-luvun hemmo jonka nimi karkaa multa nyt sanoi ihan suoraan että niin se on. Apinoiden toilauxet on täysin ennustettavia kolmesta luonnonlaista: EAT! FUCK! KILL!. "I'm not predictable", says (predictably) a woman indignantly on hearing this. Ize olen tästä täysin vakuuttunut. Hej, jag heter Barbie, vad har du för dej?
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 132: Slim, blonde, young and pretty, you might think that April could do a lot better than 58-year-old married engineer James but there is no chance of her ever leaving him for another man, unless sold to another guy second-hand.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 135: And she (April, not Tine for heaven's sake) is one of three busty £2,000 latex sex dolls with whom her husband enjoys what you might describe as an unconventional love life.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 142: "When I take April out it's usually to a hamburger place where we can stop and get a bite to eat, a lot of people don't even notice she is not a breathing person.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 144: "We usually have sex two to three sometimes four nights a week routinely. It's amazingly like having sex with a real woman. Compared to Tine, the biggest difference is whatever position you want them in you have to put them in, as they will not get there on their own.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 145: "Every guy knows what it is like to slap a woman on the butt and this is not unlike the real thing."
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 161: "I'm not a beautiful woman and these things are beautiful and I was feeling I'm not good enough.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 167: "Chloe keeps my eye from wandering because having a doll says I'm not interested in being involved with other women accept my wife.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 173: James said: "This is going to bring dolls out of the closet and into the public eye and keep them there. I am very excited about the robotic functions. The ability to answer or wink back to you, lord only knows if they could make a facial expression back to you that would be unbelievable. I might not be able to afford one but I'll keep saving."
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 175: "Fifty years from now with the way technology is moving it would not surprise me if sex robots were as common place as porn."
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 179:

"She's not a fucking toy!"

xxx/ellauri124.html on line 187: The problem with applying this definition to sex robots is that they increasingly provide much more than sex. Sex robots are not just dolls with a microchip. They use self-learning algorithms to engage their partner's emotions.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 188: Creator Ricky Ma Tsz Hang is quick to clarify that Mark 1 is not intended to be a sex robot. Rather, such robots will aim to assist with all sorts of tasks, from preparing a child's lunch to keeping an elderly relative company. So what's the big hairy diff between your wife and Samantha? For one thing, Sam is less hairy down there, unless you opt for the pubic hair extra. And most importantly, there is the blessed on/off button.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 201: Furious Dr Santos told the Daily Star Online that it would not be easy to repair Samantha because: "She is not a f***ing toy."
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 295: Suloudestaan huolimatta koiraemoji tarkoittaa ainakin joissain piireissä, että vastaanottaja on ämmä eli bitch. Englannin kielessä bitch tarkoittaa nimittäin narttukoiraa. Nimittäin. Ilkeä naarasapina ei anna vaikka vonkaan. Lyö vaan takapuolen tiukasti permantoon.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 317: Även om jag är hängiven New Age förstår jag att det inte passar för alla. Jag känner en kille som sökte efter ljuset i sitt liv och trodde det fanns inom New Age. Tyvärr kände han att han istället drogs in i ett mörker och friden inom sig kände han först när han fann Jesus. New age är för sociala individualister, monoteism är för hierarkiska fundamentalister.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 331: Dolores Haze, or it was an incubus.” No, I would not go that far. So Humbert the
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 350: Bustle was founded by Bryan Goldberg in 2013. Previously, Goldberg co-founded the website Bleacher Report with a single million-dollar investment. He claimed that "women in their 20s have nothing to read on the Internet." Bustle was launched with $6.5 million in backing from Seed and Series A funding rounds. Business is bustling.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 361: feeling some type of way. A text to send to a depressed friend might not break
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 389: “XYZ meal from Seamless is arriving at your apartment/house in 15 minutes. Enjoy.” Another option is to Venmo them enough to cover a pick-me-up lunch or coffee.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 406: coffee this morning was the last straw. “It’s not about being mean or getting back
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 411: not-so-sweet emoji.

xxx/ellauri124.html on line 421: “I’d rather not.”
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 432: felt impossibly long in high school? Worse yet 375 humanists? It’s not long enough when you’re this ticked
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 472: outfit," or less frequently, "This is literally how much I care" (notice the space
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 479: Peace Sign Emoji. Another weird turn of naming events, Apple seems to want to call what is
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 495: that someone's behavior is not deserving of real applause.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 515: if you’re like me, you want to pretend you are, in fact, “totally chill” and not
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 526: You tap my back I tap yours. Manus manum lavat, provided we both have Apple phones. Only apple users can tap one another's backs like Range Rover owners who give one another the secret middle finger salute on the road. High end models provide a huge inflatable pinky to stick out up the sunroof.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 622: Tukiainen harrasti lapsuudessaan tanssia sekä suoritti pianotutkinnon Itä-Helsingin
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 792: ”Paul” esiintyvä mies. Tyttölapsi on tammikuussa 2021 huostaanotettu ja sijoitettu
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 1047: Taapero ampui äitinsä Floridassa kesken Zoom-kokouksen. Amerikkalaisen 20-vuotiaan Shamaya Lynnin taaperoikäinen lapsi ampui sitä päähän kesken Zoom-kokouxen. Kokouxen muut osanottajat näki livenä kuinka Yasmiya kaatui pää lävistettynä. Nyt mietitään voisiko aseen omistajaa syyttää joka oli jättänyt mutkan kuleximaan lasten pikku käsiin. Vai eikö taaskaan aihetta toimenpiteisiin. Amerikassa taaperokin tietää miten käsitellään tuliasetta.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 53: Juryn arvoisat naiset ja herrat, useimmat niistä sukupuolirikollisista, jotka himoizevat jotain sykkivää, suloisentuskallista, fyysillistä mutta ei välttämättä (kyllä mielellään) yhdynnällistä suhdetta johonkin tyttölapseen, ovat vaarattomia, epäkelpoja, passiivisia, arkoja mamuja, jotka pyytävät vain, että yhteiskunta saisi heidän harjoittaa käytännöllisesti kazoen harmitonta, niinsanottua poikkeuxellista käytöstään, pieniä kuumia kosteita sexuaalisia hairahduxian, ilman että poliisi ja seurakunta ja vanhemmat hyökkäävät heidän kimppuunsa. Me emme ole sexuaalipaholaisia! Me emme välttämättä raiskaa kuten kunnon sotilaat. Me olemme onnettomia, lauhkeita koirankazeisia herrasmiehiä, riittävän eheitä hallitaxemme taipumuxiamme aikuisten läsnä ollessa, mutta valmiita antamaan vuosia ja taas vosia elämästämme saadaxemme mahdollisuuden koskettaa "nymfettiä".
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 132: “Sally era morena, praticamente da mesma idade de Lolita, e também filha de mãe viúva e chantageada com uma ameaça de internamento numa escola correcional. Seu sequestro seguiu o mesmo modus operandi que Nabokov desenvolve em seu romance. Weinman encontrou anotações e recortes de jornais sobre o caso nos arquivos do escritor, até mesmo um registro da morte de Sally, em agosto de 1952”, assinala Sérgio Augusto. “Há claras — e, às vezes, diretas — referências ao drama de Sally e a La Salle em ‘Lolita’. No capítulo final, atormentado pela culpa, Humbert-Humbert se compara a La Salle e confessa sua desconfiança de que também possa ser condenado a 35 anos por estupro.”
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 136: O livro “The Real Lolita”, de Sarah Weinman, resgata a história de duas pessoas cuja história teria colaborado para a formatação do romance “Lolita”, de Vladimir Nabokov. Brian Boyd relata que Vladimir Nabokov leu “notícias sobre acidentes publicadas em jornais, sobre crimes sexuais e assassinatos: ‘um violador de meia idade’ que raptou Sally Horner, uma garota de 15 anos de Nova Jersey, e a manteve em seu poder durante 21 meses, levando-a como ‘escrava’ por todo o país até que a encontraram em um motel do sul da Califórnia”. O nome do homem não é citado. Por que a quase nenhuma importância dada ao caso? Porque, como mostra o biógrafo, o romance de Vladimir Nabokov vai muito além da história de Sally Horner e de seu raptador. Reduzi-lo a isto é reduzir a importância de sua literatura (que nada tem de jornalismo).
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 168: When she was 14 years old, she was cast in the role of Dolores "Lolita" Haze in Stanley Kubrick's film Lolita (1962), against James Mason, then aged 53. Nabokov, the book's author, described her as the "perfect nymphet". She was chosen for the role partly because the film makers had to alter the age of the character to an older adolescent rather than the 12-year-old child Lolita in Vladimir Nabokov's novel Lolita. Although Kubrick's film altered the story so as not to be in violation of the Hollywood Production Code, it was still one of the more controversial films of the day.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 210: Kimberlyn isä Robert Kardashian tuli aikoinaan tunnetuksi Homer Simpsonin asianajajana. Vanhemmat kuitenkin erosivat 1991, ja äiti Kris meni uusiin naimisiin olympiavoittaja Bruce Jennerin (nykyisin Caitlyn Jenner) kanssa. Pari kuitenkin erosi vuonna 2015. Kimbly on muovinen lasten peli jossa heitetään noppaa painamalla nappia.Caitlyn Marie Jenner, aikaisemmin William Bruce Jenner, (s. 28. lokakuuta 1949 Mount Kisco, New York) on yhdysvaltalainen kymmenottelun olympiavoittaja. Hän voitti kultaa Montrealin olympiakisoissa 1976 maailmanennätystuloksella 8618 pistettä, nykytaulukolla 8634 pistettä. Keväällä 2015 hän kertoi julkisuudessa olevansa transnainen.Kesäkuussa 2015 Jenner poseerasi Vanity Fair -lehden kannessa naisena ja kertoi ottaneensa nimekseen Caitlyn. Jennerin uusi Twitter-tili keräsi miljoona seuraajaa hieman yli neljässä tunnissa, mikä rikkoi Yhdysvaltain presidentin Barack Obaman vain pari viikkoa aikaisemmin tekemän ennätyksen.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 240: No you're not perfect but you're not your mistakes Ei ezä ole perfekti muttezä ole vastuussa sun vioista
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 250: I know it's not the end every time I see her face, and I hear you say Mä tiedän ettei se ole loppu aina kun mä nään hiänen lätyn, ja kuulen sun sanovan
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 272: No you're not perfect but you're not your mistakes Joo ezä oo mikään super muzun virheet ei oo sun
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 299: The line as used by West is notable for what it’s not: a charged reference to black freedom. Rather, those that are “free at last” aren’t enslaved humans but a woman’s breasts, released from the bondage of a bra during a bathroom tryst.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 301: The song, which could be called bawdy were it not so lyrically dark, is one of many on West’s sixth solo studio album that reference — and commingle — sex, ethnicity and/or power.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 310: The consequence? A narrator trapped not by bloodthirsty Klansmen but by a desperate baby-mama gunning for alimony.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 317: As presented, his intentions are unclear — other than to remind you that, you know, “I am a god!” Duly noted. Maybe now West can start tapping into his benevolent side. After all, he’s going to need it in 15 years when self-aggrandizing young men start objectifying his daughter.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 322: Halvat lennot Kabul-Hamadin kansainvälinen lentokenttä
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 368: Pannahinen, eihän tässä näin pitänyt käydä, manaa tunnottomat länkkärit kun julmat inkkarit alkaa kaveerata keskenään. Aijaijaijee!
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 389: Esim Matti Pulkkinen jonka vaimo oli joku diakoni tai lehtori. Petyttyään edellisten kirjojensa saamaan vastaanottoon se väsäsi 80-luvulla uskonnollismyönteisen ja antikommunistisen tiiliskiven josta tykättiin vielä vähemmän. Ja Mika Waltari joka 50-vuotispäivän aattona kirjotti Felix Onnellisen. Senkin parhaat päivät oli takana. Niin myös Tuxu Tukiaisella.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 397: Waltari kirjoitti 1926 ylioppilaaksi Helsingin suomalaisen normaalilyseon klassiselta linjalta. Hän oli koulun pilalehden Pillerin toimittaja. Koulun jälkeen Waltari aloitti teologian opinnot Helsingin yliopistossa mutta siirtyi elämänkatsomuksellisen kriisin jälkeen pian filosofisen tiedekunnan historiallis-kielitieteelliseen osastoon. Filosofian kandidaatiksi hän valmistui 1929. Hänen käytännöllisen filosofian pro gradu -tutkielmansa Taivaallinen ja maallinen rakkaus käsitteli uskonnon ja erotiikan välistä suhdetta.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 428: From the start, critics complained about the ostensible sameness of Roth’s books, their narcissism and narrowness—or, as he himself put it, comparing his own work to his father’s conversation, “Family, family, family, Newark, Newark, Newark, Jew, Jew, Jew.” Over time, he took on vast themes—love, lust, loneliness, marriage, masculinity, ambition, community, solitude, loyalty, betrayal, patriotism, rebellion, piety, disgrace, the body, the imagination, American history, mortality, the relentless mistakes of life—and he did so in a variety of forms: comedy, parody, romance, conventional narrative, postmodernism, autofiction. In each performance of a self, Roth captured the same sound and consciousness. in nearly fifty years of reading him I’ve never been more bored. I got to know Roth in the nineteen-nineties, when I interviewed him for this magazine around the time he published “The Human Stain.” To be in his presence was an exhilarating, though hardly relaxing, experience. He was unnervingly present, a condor on a branch, unblinking, alive to everything: the best detail in your story, the slackest points in your argument. His intelligence was immense, his performances and imitations mildly funny. “He who is loved by his parents is a conquistador,” Roth used to say, and he was adored by his parents, though both could be daunting to the young Philip. Herman Roth sold insurance; Bess ruled the family’s modest house, on Summit Avenue, in a neighborhood of European Jewish immigrants, their children and grandchildren. There was little money, very few books. Roth was not an academic prodigy; his teachers sensed his street intelligence but they were not overawed by his classroom performance. Roth learned to write through imitation. His first published story, “The Day It Snowed,” was so thoroughly Truman Capote that, he later remarked, he made “Capote look like a longshoreman.”
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 485: With Walton's support, he began Call It Sleep in about 1930, completed the novel in the spring of 1934, and it was published in December 1934, to mostly good reviews. Yet the New York Herald Tribune's book critic Lewis Gannett foresaw that the book would not prove popular with its bleak depiction of New York's Lower East Side, but wrote readers would "remember it and talk about it and watch excitedly" for Roth's next book. Call It Sleep sold slowly and poorly, and after it was out-of-print, critics writing in magazines such as Commentary and Partisan Review kept praising it, and asking for it to be reprinted. After being republished in hardback in 1960 and paperback in 1964, with more than 1,000,000 copies sold, and many weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, the novel was hailed as an overlooked Depression-era masterpiece and classic novel of immigration. Today, it is widely regarded as a masterpiece of Jewish American literature. With Walton's support, he began Call It Sleep in about 1930, completed the novel in the spring of 1934, and it was published in December 1934, to mostly good reviews. Yet the New York Herald Tribune's book critic Lewis Gannett foresaw that the book would not prove popular with its bleak depiction of New York's Lower East Side, but wrote readers would "remember it and talk about it and watch excitedly" for Roth's next book. Call It Sleep sold slowly and poorly, and after it was out-of-print, critics writing in magazines such as Commentary and Partisan Review kept praising it, and asking for it to be reprinted.[ After being republished in hardback in 1960 and paperback in 1964, with more than 1,000,000 copies sold, and many weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, the novel was hailed as an overlooked Depression-era masterpiece and classic novel of immigration. Today, it is widely regarded as a masterpiece of Jewish American literature. After Muriel's death in 1990, Roth moved into a ramshackle former funeral parlor and occupied himself with revising the final volumes of his monumental work, Mercy of a Rude Stream. It has been alleged that the incestuous relationships between the protagonist, a sister, and a cousin in Mercy of a Rude Stream are based on Roth's life. Roth's own sister denied that such events occurred. Roth attributed his massive writer's block to personal problems such as depression, and to political conflicts, including his disillusion with Communism. At other times he cited his early break with Judaism and his obsessive sexual preoccupations as probable causes. Roth died in Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States in 1995. The character E. I. Lonoff in Philip Roth's Zuckerman novels (The Ghost Writer and Exit Ghost in this case), is a composite of Roth, Bernard Malamud and fictional elements.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 507: left absolutely nothing more to be said on it. But I will
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 520: still have this majestic diversion." In another place this
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 524: Robinson Crusoe says, "I cannot describe what I owe to this
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 544: is not room to repeat them here in much detail. Brigham Young, an
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 547: lightning." Solomon said, "There is nothing to recommend it but
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 556: than any other." It cannot be denied that the high antiquity of
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 668: Kun hain Paulia Luisaa ja Nuuttia Lahden rautatieasemalta Rauhixeen, kuuntelin öisellä parkkipaikalla autostereoista Bo Burnhamin spesiaaleja. Roopen rant Kill yourself pani miettimään onko se sittenkin vähän misogyyninen? Se vinoilee 2lle kuuluisammalle musikantille ja 1 vielä kuuluisammalle isohäntäiselle superjulkkixelle vähän suspektisti, Nim. Katy Perry ja Courtney Love. (Pst kaikki nää on mulle täysin uusia tuttavuuksia, Oprahia lukuunottamatta.)
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 681: And you give your all but it's not enough
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 727: There's, uh, really nothing to it.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 752: Love attended a Montessori school in Eugene, where she struggled academically and socially. At age nine, a psychologist noted that she exhibited signs of autism.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 753: Though Love was raised Roman Catholic, her mother maintained an unconventional home; according to Love, "There were hairy, wangly-ass hippies running around naked doing Gestalt therapy," and her mother raised her in a gender-free household with "no dresses, no patent leather shoes, no canopy beds, nothing".
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 772: Love named the band Hole after a line from Euripides' Medea ("There is a hole that pierces right through me") and a conversation in which her mother told her that she could not live her life "with a hole running through her".
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 777: The album's feminist slant led many to tag the band as part of the riot grrrl movement, a movement with which Love did not associate.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 784: "Just marrying created a mythology around me that I didn't expect for myself, because I had a very controlled, five-year plan about how I was going to be successful in the rock industry. Marrying Kurt, it all kind of went sideways in a way that I could not control and I became seen in a certain light–a vilified light that made Yoko Ono look like Pollyanna–and I couldn't stop it."
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 788: Live Through This was released on Geffen's subsidiary label DGC on April 12, 1994, one week after Cobain's death from a self-inflicted gunshot wound in the Seattle home he shared with Love, who was in rehab in Los Angeles at the time. In the following months, Love was rarely seen in public, holing up at her home with friends and family members. Cobain's remains were cremated and his ashes divided into portions by Love, who kept some in a teddy bear and some in an urn. In June 1994, she traveled to the Namgyal Buddhist Monastery in Ithaca, New York and had his ashes ceremonially blessed by Buddhist monks. Another portion was mixed into clay and made into memorial sculptures.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 791: Hole's performance on August 26, 1994, at the Reading Festival—Love's first public performance following Cobain's death—was described by MTV as "by turns macabre, frightening and inspirational". John Peel wrote in The Guardian that Love's disheveled appearance "would have drawn whistles of astonishment in Bedlam", and that her performance "verged on the heroic ... Love steered her band through a set which dared you to pity either her recent history or that of the band ... the band teetered on the edge of chaos, generating a tension which I cannot remember having felt before from any stage." The band performed a series of riotous concerts over the following year, with Love frequently appearing hysterical onstage, flashing crowds, stage diving, and getting into fights with audience members. One journalist reported that at the band's show in Boston in December 1994: "Love interrupted the music and talked about her deceased husband Kurt Cobain, and also broke out into Tourette syndrome-like rants. The music was great, but the raving was vulgar and offensive, and prompted some of the audience to shout back at her."
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 795: After Hole's world tour concluded in 1996, Love made a return to acting, first in small roles in the Jean-Michel Basquiat biopic Basquiat and the drama Feeling Minnesota (1996), and then a starring role as Larry Flynt's wife Althea in Miloš Forman's critically acclaimed 1996 film The People vs. Larry Flynt. Love went through rehabilitation and quit using heroin at the insistence of Forman; she was ordered to take multiple urine tests under the supervision of Columbia Pictures while filming, and passed all of them. Despite Columbia Pictures' initial reluctance to hire Love due to her troubled past, her performance received acclaim, earning a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actress, and a New York Film Critics Circle Award for Best Supporting Actress. Critic Roger Ebert called her work in the film "quite a performance; Love proves she is not a rock star pretending to act, but a true actress."
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 801: "What I really don't like—there are certain girls that like us, or like me, who are really messed up... and they do not need to be—they're very young—and they do not need to be taken and raped, or filmed having enema contests... going out into the audience and picking up fourteen and fifteen-year-old girls who obviously cut themselves, and then having to see them in the morning... it's just uncool."
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 809: Amy Phillips of The Village Voice wrote: "Love is willing to act out the dream of every teenage brat who ever wanted to have a glamorous, high-profile hissyfit [= temper tantrum], and she turns those egocentric nervous breakdowns into art. Sure, the art becomes less compelling when you've been pulling the same stunts for a decade. But, honestly, is there anybody out there who fucks up better?". The album sold fewer than 100,000 copies. Love later expressed regret over the record, blaming her drug problems at the time. Shortly after it was released, she told Kurt Loder on TRL: "I cannot exist as a solo artist. It's a joke."
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 309: Chopra believes that a person may attain "perfect health", a condition "that is free from disease, that never feels pain", and "that cannot age or die". Seeing the human body as undergirded by a "quantum mechanical body" composed not of matter but of energy and information, he believes that "human aging is fluid and changeable; it can speed up, slow down, stop for a time, and even reverse itself," as determined by one's state of mind. He claims that his practices can also treat chronic disease.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 311: The ideas Chopra promotes have regularly been criticized by medical and scientific professionals as pseudoscience. The criticism has been described as ranging "from the dismissive to...damning". Philosopher Robert Carroll writes that Chopra, to justify his teachings, attempts to integrate Ayurveda with quantum mechanics. Chopra says that what he calls "quantum healing" cures any manner of ailments, including cancer, through effects that he claims are literally based on the same principles as quantum mechanics. This has led physicists to object to his use of the term "quantum" in reference to medical conditions and the human body. Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins has said that Chopra uses "quantum jargon as plausible-sounding hocus pocus". Chopra's treatments generally elicit nothing but a placebo response and have drawn criticism that the unwarranted claims made for them may raise "false hope" and lure sick people away from legitimate medical treatments.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 327: Erikson kävi niin sanotun klassisen oppikoulun, jossa opiskeltiin latinaa, kreikkaa, kirjallisuutta ja historiaa. Hänen koulumenestyksensä ei kuitenkaan ollut kehuttava. Ylioppilaaksi tulonsa jälkeen Erikson matkusteli seitsemän vuotta pitkin Eurooppaa harrastaen muun muassa puupiirrosten ja etsausten tekoa sekä suoritti jonkin verran taideopintoja. Erikson sai 25-vuotiaana eräältä lapsuudenystävältään taide- ja historianopettajan pestin englantilaisille ja amerikkalaisille lapsille tarkoitettuun Wienissä toimivaan yksityiskouluun. Erikson tutustui Wienissä Sigmund Freudin perheeseen, minkä johdosta kutsuttiin opiskelemaan psykoanalyysia Wienin psykoanalyyttisen yhdistykseen. Erikson suoritti myös Montessori-opettajien yhdistyksen järjestämän Montessori-opetustekniikan koulutuksen sekä hygieniapassin.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 329: Valmistuttuaan psykoanalyytikoksi Erikson muutti Yhdysvaltoihin, ja rupesi pitämään Bostonin ensimmäistä lapsia hoitavaa vastaanottoa. Erikson ei ollut suorittanut lääketieteellisiä eikä muitakaan yliopisto-opintoja, mutta sai silti paikan Harvardin lääketieteelliseen tiedekunnan tutkimusapulaisena, ja myöhemmin se nimitettiin sinne proffaxi ilman tutkintoa. No tässä välissä se tutustui Margaret Meadiin ja sen partneriin Ruth Benedictiin ja meni tutkimaan intiaanilapsia. Erikson oli kova egopsygologi. Olikohan se pedofiilikin vai pysyikö iidee sillä lapsia tutkiessa pöxyissä? Omiin kokemuxiinsa perustuen se listasi...
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 456: Lisää Paulan kannanottoja: Asiantuntijatkaan eivät osaa päättää ovatko rikolliset psykopaatit sairaita vaiko vaan pahoja. Vikana on se, ettei ne parane vankilassa eikä hourulassakaan. Kananrehuxi, se olis paras ratkaisu. Pojat joitei saatu hyvix, on nyt jauhettuina jyvix. Mutta hyvin menestyvät persoonallisuushäiriöiset on parasta käyttövoimaa markkinavetoiselle yhteiskunnalle. Kaikki halut, kuten saada lapsia tai löytää työpaikka, ei tietystikään ole pahasta, mutta kyltymätön pillunhalu on. Toipuva narsisti oppii kieltäytymään varatuista naisista. Se jaxaa odottaa putken tyhjentymistä. Lisäxi lasten tulee ymmärtää, että vanhemmillakin on omat tarpeensa, joskin ne onkin enimmäxeen vessapuolella. "Pussailu on turhaa lääppimistä", sanoi Lolita. Psykopaatit voivat hankkia ekat sexikokemuxet jo 10-12-vuotiaina. He eivät osaa säädellä sukupuoliviettiään. Terve viha on hyödyllistä ja välttämätöntäkin, kuten terve izerakkaus. Sairas ei. Kaikki narsistit on piilomasentuneita, epäonnistuneet ainaskin. Masennus on izevihaa, kun ei tohdi näyttää vihaa Axalle, jonka hännän alla on.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 458: Kilpailuviettiä koskevassa luvussa ei oikein ilmene, onko kateuttakin olemassa tollasta tervettä, vai onko se aina vaan narsistista houretta. Tasoihin ja joholle voi päästä parantamalla omaa juoxuaan tai tekemällä sorkkakampit toisille. Näin jos kilpailu on vasten kelloa, mut jos on kyse vapaapainista, niin tuskin voittaa ilman niitä jalkakamppeja. Sodassa ja rakkaudessa on kaikki keinot sallittuja.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 481: The Mind & Life Institute is a US-registered, not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1991 to establish the field of contemplative sciences. Based in Charlottesville, Va., the institute “brings science and contemplative wisdom together to better understand the mind and create positive change in the world." Over three decades, Mind & Life has played a key role in the mindfulness meditation movement by funding research projects and think tanks, and by convening conferences and dialogues with the Dalai Lama. Since 2020, Mind & Life's grant-making events and digital programs have sought to nurture personal wellbeing, build more compassionate communities, and strengthen the human-earth connection. And fatten the monks' bank accounts. 1 to lama, 2 to me.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 539: Someone very insecure about who they are that they must at all times appear to be 'edgy' with shock value in order to stay relevant. This often means someone who thinks excessive violence and guns are cool, plays way too much GTA and goes out of their way to be an annoying hipster douchebag, often excusing their pretty disgusting selfish behaviour and toxic conceited attitudes by quoting "Beyond Good and Evil" by Neitzsche. They will also find other Edgelords to create cliques with in order to maintain their comfortable Groupthink dynamics and will malign those who do not share their miserable hipster world view.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 550: Narsistinen henkilö voi kieltää puolisonsa menot, ja estää näin tätä menemästä harrastuksiinsa sekä tapaamasta ystäviään ja perhettään. Narsisti on yltiöpäisen mustasukkainen.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 555: Henkilöpä henkilö. Vaikkei suoraan sanota, nää neuvokit on suunnattu naisille. Uhri on naaraspuolinen ja ao. narsisti on mieshenkilö. Niin aina.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 712: Ämmän näkemyksen mukaan kaikkien uskontojen päämäärä on kuitenkin aina sama: saada ihminen oivaltamaan olevansa yhtä Jumalan, (ja vai eli?) kaikkeuden kanssa ja antaa ohjeita siitä, miten tämä oivallus saavutetaan. Ämmän käydessä Suomessa vuonna 2005 arviolta noin kahdeksantuhatta ihmistä jonotti kahden päivän aikana Ämmän jaxuhalia.Amman arvioidaan halanneen ainakin 24 miljoonaa ihmistä viimeisten 30 vuoden aikana. Kriitikoiden mielestä luku on liioiteltu, sillä siihen päästäkseen Amman pitäisi halata kaksi ihmistä jokaisena valveillaolon minuuttina. Nukkumiseen laskelmassa jätetään kahdeksan tuntia vuorokaudessa. Jos joulupukki toisi lahjat kaikille, se ja porot sulaisivat kitkasta. Kati Saramäki on kertonut löytäneensä väylän Äiti Ämmän luo Mikko von Hertzenin musiikin kautta. Jonkinlainen madonreikä kai.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 741: Psykodynaamisessa ja psykoanalyyttisessa terapiassa psykoterapeutti antaa tilaa asiakkaan omalle pohdinnalle. Hoidon keinona painottuu keskustelu ja terapeuttinen vuorovaikutus, eivät niinkään kotitehtävät tai harjoitukset. Elämänhistorian läpikäyminen ja sen vaikutuksen ymmärtäminen nykyhetkeen on keskeinen osa työskentelyä. Nää on just niitä pilakuvien sohvapotilaita jotka jaanaavat terapeutin nukkuessa tai ratkoessa ristisanoja.
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 761: Esim 1/2 h huokumista, sitten 1/2h toimeliasta ajattelua ihmisistä joista et pidä. Muistiinpanot ruutupaperille!
xxx/ellauri126.html on line 839: Katsoin tässä päivänä muutamana Netflixin dokumenttielokuvaa Tony Robbins: I am not your guru, joka nostatti jälleen kerran pohtimaan oman itsen motivoinnin, omien uskomusten, totuttujen kaavojen, mielen tiedostamattomien lauseiden ja omien pelkojen tiedostamisen merkitystä.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 60: However, Kilmer's eldest son, Kenton, declares that the poem does not apply to any one tree—that it could apply equally to any. "Trees" was written in an upstairs bedroom at the family's home in Mahwah, New Jersey, that "looked out down a hill, on our well-wooded lawn". Kenton Kilmer stated that while his father was "widely known for his affection for trees, his affection was certainly not sentimental—the most distinguished feature of Kilmer's property was a colossal woodpile outside his home". The house stood in the middle of a forest and what lawn it possessed was obtained only after Kilmer had spent months of weekend toil in chopping down trees, pulling up stumps, and splitting logs. Kilmer's neighbors had difficulty in believing that a man who could do that could also be a poet.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 67: It was dedicated to his wife's mother, Mrs. Henry Mills Alden, who was endeared to all her family. Another mother and son not in law video? Kilmer's poetry was influenced by "his strong religious faith and dedication to the natural beauty of the world."
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 142: Me kuljimme päästä päähän ja taas takaisin koko Amerikan tienvieriravintoloitten asteikon, alkaen vaatimattomasta Eat'ista, jossa oli hirvenpää (sisemmässä silmänurkassaan tumma pitkän kyynelen jälki), 'humoristisia postikortteja (myöhempää 'Kurort'-tyyppiä), vieraiden kirjoittamia suosituksia kehyksissä, hengenpelastajia, aurinkolaseja, mainostaiteilijan näkyjä taivaallisista jäätelöannoksista, puolikas suklaakaakkua lasisuojuksen alla ja useita kammottavan kokeneita kärpäsiä risteilemässä kehnolle tiskille valuneessa tahmeassa sokeriliemessä, ja niin edelleen aina siihen kalliiseen paikkaan asti, jossa oli himmennetyt valot, nurinkurisen kehnot pöytä- ja ruokaliinat, tolkuttomat tarjoilijat (vankilalintuja tai opiskelijoita), filminäyttelijättären harmaanruskea selkä, hänen senhetkisen miehensä synkät kulmakarvat ja pjattipukuinen trumpetin varustettu orkesteri.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 174: vaatteet ovat hienot, kunhan ne on rikottu jo ennen kaupan hyllylle laittamista.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 189: vastaanottaminenkin on sitä hyväksyttävämpää, mitä varakkaampi ihminen on
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 213: kertautuu myös niin sanotussa terapiakulttuurissa – on moraalisesti aina vain
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 236: Despite the cleverness and thickness of literary references of Alfred Appel’s « The Annotated Lolita« , one can’t help thinking the point is missing. Witten miälestä Humbert ei ole kukaan muu kuin Dodgson
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 252: 1952 is a capital year in the novel and the number 52 is omnipresent and thus loaded with a mysterious meaning in the mind of Nabokov, in the context of this novel. It must be a central symbolic element in the Lolita’s riddle. Se oli hyvä vuosi muutenkin. « Pierre Point in Melville Sound » (p.33 TAL) was a reference to « Pierre or the Ambiguities » a Novel by Herman Melville (1819-1891; notice the 19/91) published in 1852. «brun adolescent (…) se tordre-oh Baudelaire! » (p.162 TAL): Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867 was one of the most famous French poet who translated Edgar A. Poe in French). A part of « Le Crépuscule du Matin » (1852). Se tordre tarkoittanee käteenvetoa. Humbert refering to the hunchbacked hoary black groom at the « Enchanted Hunters » Hotel: « Handed over to uncle Tom » (p.118 TAL): « Uncle Tom’s Cabin » by Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811-1896) is from 1852. Ehm… the list is non-negligible.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 254: The mention (p.289 TAL) of the case abduction and rape of the 11 years old Florence Sally Horner by a 50 years old man. In 1948, the 11-year-old Horner stole a 5-cent notebook from a store in Camden, New Jersey. Frank La Salle, a 50-year-old mechanic, caught her stealing, told her that he was an FBI agent, and threatened to send her to « a place for girls like you« . Then he abducted the girl and spent 21 months traveling with her over different American states and raping her. Florence Horner died in a car accident (p.288 TAL, « a routine highway accident«) near Woodbine, New Jersey, in 1952. It seems clear that the case inspired partly « Lolita » (even though this theme existed long before in Nabokov’s works (see for instance his 1939 work « Volshebnik » (i.e. « The Enchanter« ))).
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 282: The most famous literary version of Melusine tales, that of Jean d'Arras, compiled about 1382–1394, was worked into a collection of "spinning yarns" as told by ladies at their spinning coudrette (coulrette (in French)). He wrote The Romans of Partenay or of Lusignen: Otherwise known as the Tale of Melusine, giving source and historical notes, dates and background of the story. Another version, Chronique de la princesse (Chronicle of the Princess). tells how in the time of the Crusades, Elynas, the King of Albany (an old name for Scotland or Alba), went hunting one day and came across a beautiful lady in the forest. She was Pressyne, mother of Melusine. He persuaded her to marry him but she agreed, only on the promise—for there is often a hard and fatal condition attached to any pairing of fay and mortal—that he must not enter her chamber when she birthed or bathed her children. She gave birth to triplets. When he violated this taboo, Pressyne left the kingdom, together with her three daughters, and traveled to the lost Isle of Avalon.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 356:

Vastaanotto

xxx/ellauri127.html on line 371: Unsurprisingly, (mostly male) scientists have done gobs of research trying to figure out what women want in men. But they have spent much less time uncovering the reverse: what makes women attractive to men. Let's not even get started on the dearth of research on what men find attractive in other men, or women in other women.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 377: We tracked down scientific findings that did not zero in on physical appearances alone. Some of the studies are small, or included only horny Western male college students, so they cannot be overgeneralized. But the results are still intriguing — and often educational.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 398: He wants you to want him but not need him afterward. Not clingy.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 410: Be intelligent if you must. But not more intelligent than he if possiblen.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 508: 16. The Human Stain is a novel of sweeping ambition that tells the stories not just of individual lives but of the moral ethos of America at the end of the twentieth century. How would that ethos be described? What does the novel reveal about the complexity of issues such as race, sex, identity, and privacy?
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 524: On it being revealed that Nerissa and the clerk were one and the same, he is much relieved to discover that he has not in fact been cuckolded, and closes the play on a bawdy pun. Nerissa's ring is the sphincter between her legs.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 611: That every fool is not a poet.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 645: Klein’s insistence on viewing aggression as an important force in its own right when analyzing children led her into conflict with Freud’s own daughter, Anna Freud, who was one of the other prominent child psychotherapists in continental Europe but who became moved to London in 1938 where Klein had been working for several years. Many controversies arose out of this conflict, and these are often referred to as controversial debates. In reality, the semitic hags were in one another's hairs. Lähde:
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 715: Thomas Rowley (1721–1796) was a famous poet of Vermont, known both as the spokesman for Ethan Allen and dubbed “The Bard of the Green Mountains.” During his lifetime and before the American Revolution, his poetry gained the reputation with the catchphrase of "Setting the Balls on Fire." Rowley's poetry actually focused not only on politics, but also on the pleasantness and rustic nature of pioneer life, with humor and witty observations. For example, in another poetic inventory of his "estate", he sums up that he has virtually nothing, but still he was independent and happy.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 719: However, Endymion, the "brain-sick shepherd-prince" of Mt. Latmos, is in a trancelike state, and not participating in their discourse. His sister, Peona (Fanny), takes him away and brings him to her resting place where he sleeps. After he wakes, he tells Peona of his encounter with Cynthia (Fanny B.), and how much he loved her. The poem is divided into four books, each approximately 1,000 lines long. TLDR, quips Peona.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 721: Book I gives Endymion's account of his dreams and experiences, as related to Peona, which provides the background for the rest of the poem. In Book II, Endymion ventures into the underworld in search of his love. He encounters Adonis and Venus—a pairing of mortal and immortal—apparently foreshadowing a similar destiny for the mortal Endymion and his immortal paramour. Book III reveals Endymion's enduring love, and he begs the Moon not to torment him any longer as he journeys through a watery void on the sea floor. There he meets Glaucus, freeing the god from a thousand years of imprisonment by the witch Circe. Book IV, "And so he groan'd, as one by beauty slain."
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 723: Anyway, Endymion falls in love with a beautiful Indian maiden. Both ride winged black steeds to Mount Olympus where Cynthia awaits, only for Endymion to forsake the goddess for his new, mortal, love. Endymion and the Indian girl return to earth, the latter saying she cannot be his love. He is miserable, 'til quite suddenly he comes upon the Indian maiden again and she reveals that she is in fact Cynthia. She then tells him of how she tried to forget him, to move on, but that in the end, "'There is not one,/ No, no, not one/ But thee.'"
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 738: At eighteen, Fanny Brawne “was small, her eyes were blue and often enhanced by blue ribbons in her brown hair; her mouth expressed determination and a sense of humour and her smile was disarming. She was not conventionally beautiful: her nose was a little too aquiline, her face too pale and thin (some called it sallow). But she knew the value of elegance; velvet hats and muslin bonnets, crêpe hats with argus feathers, straw hats embellished with grapes and tartan ribbons: Fanny noticed them all as they came from Paris. She could answer, at a moment’s notice, any question on historical costume. ... Fanny enjoyed music. ... She was an eager politician, fiery in discussion; she was a voluminous reader. ... Indeed, books were her favourite topic of conversation”.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 739: Shall I give you Miss Brawn? She is about my height—with a fine style of countenance of the lengthen'd sort—she wants sentiment in every feature—she manages to make her hair look well—her nostrills are fine—though a little painful—her mouth is bad and good—her Profil is better than her full-face which indeed is not full but pale and thin without showing any bone—Her shape is very graceful and so are her movements—her Arms are good her hands badish—her feet tolerable—she is not seventeen—but she is ignorant—monstrous in her behaviour flying out in all directions, calling people such names—that I was forced lately to make use of the term Minx—this is I think not from any innate vice but from a penchant she has for acting stylishly. I am however tired of such style and shall decline any more of it".
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 743: Endymion received scathing criticism after its release, and Keats himself noted its diffuse and unappealing style. Keats did not regret writing it, as he likened the process to leaping into the ocean to become more acquainted with his surroundings; in a poem to J. A. Hessey, he expressed that "I was never afraid of failure; for I would sooner fail than not be among the greatest." However, he did feel regret in its publishing, saying "it is not without a feeling of regret that I make it public." Not all critics disliked the work. eg. the poet Thomas Hood. Henry Morley said, "The song of Endymion throbs throughout with a noble poet's sense of all that his art means for him. What mechanical defects there are in it may even serve to quicken our sense of the youth and freshness of this voice of aspiration." Meaning: Dig it mon. Endymionin jälkeen Keaz kommentoi sen vastaanottoa seuraavasti.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 807: And nothing else saw all day long; Enkä nähnyt muuta koko päivänä;
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 858: "Aunen aaton" sanottiin sisältävän "ärsyttävää inhon tunnetta" ja "'Don Juan' -tyylistä tunteilun ja pilkan sekoitusta, eikä runo sovi naisille". Keats kysyy kirjeissään yhä uudestaan, mitä tarkoittaa runoilijana oleminen. Kukaan ei vaivautunut vastaamaan.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 896: For summer has o'er-brimm'd their clammy cells. Vaikka kesä on jo täyttänyt niiden kennot.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 898: Who hath not seen thee oft amid thy store? Kukapa ei olisi nähnyt sua hillokellarissa?
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 911: Think not of them, thou hast thy music too,— Älä niitä haeskele, sulla ihan oma musa on, -
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 58: Suuren rakkauden keinot saattavat muistuttaa terroria.N.N.MFUCK!
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 105: Vaakku ilmeisesti piti vastustelevista runotytöistä. Sama predilektio näkyy mom and son videoissa: "mami" pyristelee vastaan alussa, mutta panee vastaan tarmokkaasti loppupeleissä. Haista-paska kappalainen Capellanus näyttää olleen Vaakun lemppareita. Ruma Honoré de Balzac oli kanssa kova panomies, tosin se sai työntää vasta maxettuaan runsaasti. Paul Bourget oli varsinainen pahis, kuten jo tiedetään. Näissä hanuissa on hurjasti narsisteja. Chardonne eli puteli-Jaakko oli Vaakun poliittinen virkaveli. Cicero oli tyhmä snobi kikhernekauppias. Disraeli Tears oli poikkeuxellisesti hölmö jutku. Dosto komppaa Catullusta Karamazoveissa tän suositun vihaava rakkaus-aiheen suhteen. Duclos näyttää olleen paskiainen miehexeen. Hemmetin paljon on näitä koiraan lisääntymisstrategia-aiheita, missä rakkautta piisaa just niin kauan että pääsee luukulle, ja sitten alkaa jo huooh ikävystyttää. Vaakulla on vitun vähän ylipäänsä naisia muutakuin puheenaiheena. Joubert on nyysinyt ton "ei 2x samaa" penseen ihailemaltaan Rochefoucauldilta (tai vastoin päin). Vaakulla ja Tommilla on samojakin töräyxiä respektiivisissä kokoelmissa. Nietschen penseet naimisesta on niin heikkoja ettei viizi edes mainita. Sen kokemuxet siitä oli aika rajallisia. Mitä jää viivan alle kun Shawin supistus on tehty? Minielefantin kärsä. Tosta tottumuxen osuudesta rakkaudessa näyttää M/F töräyttäjät ottavan ihan vastakkaisia kantoja. Koiraiden kannalta on toi uutuudenviehätys tietty tärkeä. Jokainen uusi reikä on uusi tilaisuus. Riippumahainen Ball-sack ei kyllä tiennytkään mitään häveliäisyydestä. Sen Contes drolatiques on pitkästyttävä. Disdraeli saa lisää haukkuja albumissa 243.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 132: Charles Pinot Duclos né à Dinan, le 12 février 1704 et mort à Paris le 26 mars 1772, est un écrivain et historien français.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 138: À l'Académie, il soutint généralement le parti des Philosophes, mais sans en faire partie car les excès de ses membres l’irritaient : « Les grands raisonneurs et les sous-petits raisonneurs de notre siècle, disait-il, en feront et en diront tant qu’ils finiront par m’envoyer à confesse. » Ses relations avec Voltaire furent froides et leur correspondance n’est qu’académique et de politesse. Il n’avait pas de relations avec Diderot, dont on lui reprocha d’avoir fait échouer la candidature à l’Académie. Il se brouilla avec D'Alembert et les deux hommes ne se réconcilièrent jamais entièrement. Généralement, son caractère autoritaire rendit ses relations souvent difficiles avec ses collègues.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 153: Walter "Savage" Landor (1775–1864) oli englantilainen kirjailija. Hän oli niin kiivasluontoinen että hänet erotettiin sekä Rugbyn koulusta että myöhemmin Oxfordin yliopistosta. Hän siirtyi Lontooseen, missä hän julkaisi englannin ja latinan kielellä ensimmäiset runoelmansa. Landorin ensimmäinen laajahko runoteos oli Gebir (1798). Tässä, kuten Landorin myöhemmissäkin runoissa, huomaa järvikoulun ja varsinkin Byronin ällöömän Robert Southeyn vaikutusta. Landorin draamat Count Julian (1811), Andrea of Hungary ja Giovanni of Naples (1839) eivät menestyneet näyttämöllä, ne olivatkin aivan paskoja. Landor eli ahtaissa taloudellisissa oloissa enimmäkseen Walesissa vuoteen 1805, jolloin hän isänsä kuoltua peri kokonaisen omaisuuden. Hän lähti 1808 Espanjaan taistelemaan ranskalaisia vastaan, värväsi omilla varoillaan soturijoukon ja joutui siksi taas taloudelliseen ahdinkoon. Hän siirtyi 1815 Italiaan, missä hän asui 20 vuotta, loppuiällään taloudellisten huolien rasittamana, joihin hän ilman Robert Browningin apua olisi sortunut. Samoin kuin lordi Byron ja Leigh Hunt, myös Landor oli intohimoinen vapauden (= britti-imperialismin) rakastaja, ja vapauden asialle hän oli valmis uhraamaan omaisuutensa. Landorin pääteos on Imaginary conversations of imaginary literary men and statesmen, jonka kaksi edellistä osaa ilmestyivät 1824 ja kolme jälkimmäistä 1829. Teos on täynnä tekosyvällisiä ajatuksia esitettynä kauniilla, dramaattisesti voimakkaalla, joskaan ei aina helposti tajuttavalla proosatyylillä. Eeva Kilpi on suomentanut osittain runon "On his seventy-fifth birthday" julkaisuun Tätä runoa en unohda. Pertti Niemisen suomentama runo "En käynyt kiistaan, hillizin izeni" on julkaistu kokoelmassa Kuu kultainen terälehti.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 195: Sie litt damals unter der Vorstellung, es habe „ein außerirdisch Wesen, als ich in die Welt getrieben wurde, beim Eingang diese Worte mit einem Dolch in’s Herz gestoßen [...]: ‚Ja, habe Empfindung, sieh die Welt, wie sie Wenige sehen, sei groß und edel, ein ewiges Denken kann ich dir auch nicht nehmen, Eins hat man aber vergessen: sei eine Jüdin!‘ und nun ist mein ganzes Leben eine einzige Verblutung [...]“. Zu den Jugendfreundinnen Rahels Varnhagens gehörten auch Nichtjuden wie die Tochter einer hugenottischen Einwandererfamilie Pauline Wiesel, geb. César, mit der sie eine lebenslange Freundschaft verbinden sollte, oder der schwedische Gesandte Karl Gustav Brinckmann, der in ihrer Abwesenheit ihren Schreibtisch benutzen durfte.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 303: Olisin lämmin tuuli notkoissasiMikko KilpiMFUCK!
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 330: Olisi paljon sanottavaa ellet koko ajan keskeyttäisi silmillä.Chistopher MorleyMFUCK!
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 374: Naiset ei suutu väkisinotosta, vaan hylkäyxestäCharles TalleyrandMFUCK!
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 409: Osallistuttuaan ensimmäiseen maailmansotaan Reik työskenteli Wienin psykoanalyyttisen yhdistyksen kirjastonhoitajana ja piti psykoanalyyttista vastaanottoa. Koska hänellä ei ollut lääkärinkoulutusta, häneltä kiellettiin potilaiden hoitaminen vuonna 1925 Itävallan "puoskarointilain" nojalla. Reik valitti päätöksestä ja jatkoi vastaanottoaan. Vuoden 1926 keväällä häntä vastaan nostettiin rikossyyte puoskaroinnista eli oikeudettomasta lääkärintoimen harjoittamisesta. Freud asettui tukemaan Reikia ja maallikkoanalyysia (ei-lääkäreiden harjoittamaa psykoanalyysia) ja julkaisi kirjan Maallikkoanalyysin kysymys. Freudin myötämielinen kanta jäi kuitenkin vähemmistöön, sillä monet lääkäri-psykoanalyytikot vastustivat maallikoiden analyysitoimintaa. Vuoden 1927 keväällä syytteet hylättiin.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 459: Wystan Hugh Auden (/ˈwɪstən ˈhjuː ˈɔːdən/ 21 February 1907 – 29 September 1973) was an Anglo-American poet. Auden´s poetry was noted for its stylistic and technical achievement, its engagement with politics, morals, love, and religion, and its variety in tone, form, and content. Some of his best known poems are about love, such as "Funeral Blues"; on political and social themes, such as "September 1, 1939" and "The Shield of Achilles"; on cultural and psychological themes, such as The Age of Anxiety; and on religious themes such as "For the Time Being" and "Horae Canonicae".
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 462: Lasse Matias Heikkilä, sukunimi vuoteen 1930 Levola (6. marraskuuta 1925 Kiikoinen – 26. maaliskuuta 1961 Sipoo) oli suomalainen runoilija, jota pidettiin yhtenä 1950-luvun modernismin keskeisistä vaikuttajista. Heikkilän esikoisteos Miekkalintu (1949) oli ensimmäisiä tietoisesti modernistisia runoteoksia Suomessa. Lasse Heikkilän äiskä menehtyi syntyessään, ja Heikkilän kasvattiäitikin kuoli vuonna 1940. Lasse Heikkilä oli jatkosodan aikana mukana Ihantalan taistelussa vain 18-vuotiaana panssarintorjuntamiehenä. Nämäkin kokemukset jättivät Heikkilään syvät jäljet. Sotavuosina Heikkilä alkoi myös käyttää alkoholin ohella unilääkkeitä ja piristäviä aineita, mikä johti myöhemmin hänen ennenaikaiseen kuolemaansa. Hän kuului nuorten intellektuellien homopettereiden Urania-piiriin, jossa tutkittiin kirjallisuutta ja filosofiaa, mutta myös matematiikkaa ja äärettömyyden teoriaa.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 495: Karl Murdock Bowman (November 4, 1888 – March 2, 1973) was a pioneer in the study of psychiatry. From 1944 to 1946 he was the president of the American Psychiatric Association. His work in alcoholism, schizophrenia, and homosexuality is particularly often cited. In 1953, in "The Problem of Homosexuality," co-authored with Bernice Engle, he argued for multiple causes, including genetics, but proposed that castration be studied as a cure. However, in 1961 he appeared in the television documentary The Rejected presenting the viewpoint that homosexuality is not a mental illness and should be legalized.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 536: In his memoirs, he calls his father “bashful” and his mother “reserved.” Between them, they filled the house with “melancholy reticences and unexpressed doubts.” Some of the silence surrounded a particular subject: the family’s Jewishness. This was not exactly hidden, but it was not brought to the fore, either. Maurois, who was born Émile Herzog on July 26, 1885, found out that he was Jewish at the age of about six, when a friend at the local Protestant church told him so. His parents confirmed it, but they also spoke highly of Protestantism.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 538: He had a good education at the lycée in Rouen, falling under the influence of a charismatic teacher, Émile-Auguste Chartier, known as “Alain.” Alain inspired other pupils, too, including Simone Weil and Raymond Aron, urging them to question received ideas. He gave Maurois a love of literature but also, perhaps surprisingly, urged him to take up the mill business after leaving school. Maurois did so, but in his Elbeuf office he kept a secret cupboard filled with Balzac novels and notebooks, and copied out pages of Stendhal to improve his writing style. He became a Kipling enthusiast, and learned excellent English. He travelled to Paris at least one day a week, and frequented brothels there.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 584: British Eugenics Society oli Darwinin serkun Sir Francis Galtonin aivopieruja. Galton ei selvinnyt laajennetusta matematiikasta ja lääkärinopinnotkin jäi sitten kesken. Tehdäänpä sensijaan nazimeisingillä selvää muista misfiteistä! Galtonin veljexiin kuului mm iljexet Julian ja Aldous Huxley, H.G.Wells, Winston Churchill, Bertrand Russell ja Charles Darwin. "Man is gifted with pity and other kindly feelings; he has also the power of preventing many kinds of suffering. I conceive it to fall well within his province to replace Natural Selection by other processes that are more merciful and not less effective. This is precisely the aim of Eugenics.” Since wars begin in the minds of men and women, it is in the minds of men and women that the defences of peace must be constructed. (UNESCO)
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 590: Max Ernst (2 April 1891 – 1 April 1976) was a German (naturalised American in 1948 and French in 1958) painter, sculptor, graphic artist, and poet. A prolific artist, Ernst was a primary pioneer of the Dada movement and surrealism. He had no formal artistic training, but his experimental attitude toward the making of art resulted in his invention of frottage—a technique that uses pencil rubbings of objects as a source of images—and grattage, an analogous technique in which paint is scraped across canvas to reveal the imprints of the objects placed beneath. He is also noted for his novels consisting of collages. Vitun tuhertaja. Onko hölmömpää kuin noi Maxin älynväläyxet? Se on yhtä puupää kuin Wolfram Rothin isäpuoli Ernst Rüdiger. Turmiolan Hannu on kyllä raapinut aforismikasaansa ihan pahnanpohjatkin. Oscar Wilden turauxet puolestaan on tyypillistä homopetteröintiä.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 595: Margaret Caroline Anderson (November 24, 1886 – October 19, 1973) was the American founder, editor and publisher of the art and literary magazine The Little Review, which published a collection of modern American, English and Irish writers between 1914 and 1929. The periodical is most noted for introducing many prominent American and British writers of the 20th century, such as Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot in the United States, and publishing the first thirteen chapters of James Joyce's then-unpublished novel, Ulysses. A large collection of her papers on Gurdjieff's teaching is now preserved at Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University. She was blond, shapely, with lean ankles and a Scandinavian face. ... In 1916, Anderson met Jane Heap. The two became lovers. In early 1924, through Alfred Richard Orage, Anderson came to know of spiritual teacher George Ivanovitch Gurdjieff, and saw performances of his 'Sacred dances', first at the 'Neighbourhood Playhouse', and later at Carnegie Hall. Shortly after Gurdjieff's automobile accident, Anderson, along with Georgette Leblanc, Jane Heap and Monique Surrere, moved to France to visit him at Fountainebleau-Avon, where he had set up his institute at Château du Prieuré in Avon.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 597: The teachings of George Ivanovitch Gurdjieff played an important role in Anderson's life. Anderson met Gurdjieff in Paris and, together with Leblanc, began studies with him, focusing on his original teaching called The Fourth Way. Along with Katherine Mansfield and Jane Heap, she remains one of the most noted institutees of Gurdjieff´s, Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man, at Fontainebleau, near Paris, from October 1922 to 1924. Anderson studied with Gurdjieff in France until his death in October 1949, writing about him and his teachings in most of her books, most extensively in her memoir, The Unknowable Gurdjieff. By 1942 her relationship with Heap had cooled. Anderson sailed for the United States. Jane Heap had moved to London in 1935, where she led Gurdjieff study groups until her death in 1964. With her passage paid by Ernest Hemingway, Anderson met on the voyage Dorothy Caruso, widow of the singer and famous tenor Enrico Caruso. The two began a romantic relationship, and lived together until Dorothy´s death in 1955. Anderson returned to Le Cannet, and there she died of emphysema on October 19, 1973.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 613: Markku Juhani Lahtela (1. elokuuta 1936 Kemijärvi – 31. heinäkuuta 1980 Nummi) oli suomalainen kirjailija. Hänet tunnettiin radikaaleista yhteiskunnallisista kannanotoista, sillä hän oli humanististen tieteiden kandidaatti (Helsingin yliopisto 1963). Lahtela suomensi teoksia, joista keskusteltiin 1960-luvulla paljon, muun muassa A. S. Neillin teoksen Summerhill, joka oli niin sanotun vapaan kasvatuksen perusteos, sekä yhden beat-kirjallisuuden tunnetuimmista teoksista, Jack Kerouacin Matkalla. Keväällä 1967 Lahtela herätti huomiota polttaessaan julkisesti sotilaspassinsa Helsingissä Esplanadin puistossa Kalevi Seilosen, Ilpo Saunion ja Tauno Tuomivaaran kanssa. Miehet kärähtivät ja Mara tuomittiin sakkoihin. Lahtelan isä oli kansanedustaja ja ministeri Olavi Lahtela, äiti kirjailija Kyllikki Kallas ja isänisä kansanedustaja Matti Lahtela. SDP:n poliitikko Mikael Jungner on hänen sisarenpoikansa. Lahtela kärsi alkoholismista. Hän teki itsemurhan pyssyllä vuonna 1980. Taisi olla aihetta. Markku Lahtelan kirja "Se" (1966) oli "huikea".
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 629: As an undergraduate, Atkinson read Simone de Beauvoir´s The Second Sex, and struck up a correspondence with de Beauvoir, who suggested that she contact Betty Friedan. Atkinson became an early member of Friedan´s National Organization for Women. Atkinson´s time with the organization was tumultuous, including a row with the national leadership over her attempts to defend and promote Valerie Solanas and her SCUM Manifesto in the wake of the Andy Warhol shooting. In 1968 she left the organization because it would not confront issues like abortion and marriage inequalities. She founded the October 17th Movement, which later became The Feminists, a radical feminist group active until 1973. By 1971 she had written several pamphlets on feminism, was a member of the Daughters of Bilitis and was advocating specifically political lesbianism. "Sisterhood," Atkinson famously said, "is powerful. It kills mostly sisters." The Daughters of Bilitis / b ɪ ˈ l iː t ɪ s /, also called the DOB or the Daughters, was the first lesbian civil and political rights organization in the United States. Bilitis is not cholitis nor Kari Matihaldi disease, but a fictional companion of Sappho.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 34: Heräsin aamuyöllä kesken neuvostoaikaista unta kyljen kutinaan. Vessassa selvisi että siinä oli punkinpoikanen. Yön aikana oli kypsynyt kannanotto, että aforistiikka on PUOLIVILLAISTA. Menneiden aikojen Kim Kardashian js Kanye West touhua. Turhat julkkixet pääsee heittää läppiä. Punkkinymfetti putos lavuaariin, kai. Se saattoi olla peräisin Osmolta. Sekin vielä.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 240: Riku sanoo että pornotähti Roni Jeremy pystyi ottaa suihin izeään, pitkäselkäisempi Riku joutuu imettämään muilla. Voikun oisi mullakin tollanen häräntappoase ja sille sopivanmittainen härkönen. Tuoxuvatukka. Tuoxuvitukka, tuoxuvatussukka. Jospa oisin yhtä kuuluisa kuin opiskelutoverini Jaakko Yli-Juonikas. Jospa oisin yhtä juonikas kuin luokkatoverini Jaakko Yli-Kuuluisa. Terveissi Turkkusest, Vaakun pesästä.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 318: Korhonen rakensi ensimmäiset kaukoputkensa lapsena 1950-luvulla, jolloin avaruuden tutkimus eli alkuaikaansa, babylonialaisten tihrustellessa taivaalle ilman silmälaseja. Pian hän oli jo hionut valmiiksi ensimmäisen oman peilikaukoputkensa. Hän aloitti avaruusalan opinnot ja meni myöhemmin tähtitieteilijäksi Tuorlan observatorioon, jossa hän keskittyi avaruusoptiikan tutkimusalaan. Korhosen ensimmäinen suuri toimeksianto oli 2,5-metrisen peilin valmistus yhteispohjoismaiseen NOT (Nordic Optical Telescope) -observatorioon, joka sijaitsee La Palmalla Kanariansaarilla. La Palmalla on lisäksi kaksi muuta hänen tekemäänsä peiliä ja maailman suurimmalla linssiobjektiivilla varustettu aurinkoteleskooppi. Yksi peili on myös Etelä-Amerikan Chilessä, ja myös kiertoradalla on yksi jo ennen Herschelin sinne saapumista
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 365: Lukijat pohtivat Rikun tekstiä tarkasti. Joitakin sen puutteita alleviivataan: on liian oudosti sanottu, että ihminen saa nenuunsa, ja miksi kertomuksen päähenkilö haahuilee niin paljon paikasta toiseen?
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 443: Smarra gets two stars, both were disappointing chores to read. If you are considering taking up Smarra because you heard it was the earliest vampire story, I think you´re heading for disappointment. In a dream sequence, some undead creatures with sharpened teeth that like to drink blood are described, but nothing further. There´s no real vampire lore or any characterization of vampirism to sink one´s teeth into. I had a hard time figuring out the plot of Smarra, but I think it´s mostly about a man trying to wake up from bad dreams and finding out he can´t. The dreams are recounted vaguely, in terms of plot, but in excruciating detail, in terms of vision, none of which has its significance explained.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 445: I appreciate the novella has a plot, but this strength is not enough to overcome the story´s weaknesses, which for me were 1) overly long paragraphs of narrative--one went for almost six pages, and 2) a lack of understanding until almost halfway through the story what the stakes for the protagonist were.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 582: Hienot naiset on olevinaan et jotain sopimatonta ei olekaan.Friedrich NietzscheMFUCK!
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 601: Elle est renommée pour sa traduction en français des Principia Mathematica de Newton, qui fait encore autorité aujourd'hui. Elle a aussi contribué à diffuser en France l'œuvre physique de Leibniz, notamment en prouvant expérimentalement sa théorie selon laquelle l'énergie cinétique (appelée à l'époque « force vive ») est proportionnelle à la masse et au carré de la vitesse.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 642: Elizabeth Parsons Ware Packard (28 December, 1816 – 25 July, 1897), also known as E.P.W. Packard, was an American advocate for the rights of women and people accused of insanity. She was wrongfully confined by her husband who claimed that she had been insane, for more than three years. At her trial, 3 yrs later, a jury took just seven minutes to find her not insane. Pezku koitti samaa Kikalle Hangossa heikommin tuloxin, valkotakit veivät Petterin.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 654: Elizabeth's lawyers, Stephen Moore and John W. Orr, responded by calling witnesses from the neighborhood that knew the Packards but were not members of Theophilus' church. These witnesses testified they never saw Elizabeth exhibit any signs of insanity, while discussing religion or otherwise. The final witness was Dr. Duncanson, who was both a physician and a theologian. Dr. Duncanson had interviewed Elizabeth and he testified that while not necessarily in agreement with all her religious beliefs, she was sane in his view, arguing that "I do not call people insane because they differ with me. I pronounce her a sane woman and wish we had a nation of such women.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 656: The jury took only seven minutes to find in Elizabeth's favor. She was legally declared sane, and Judge Charles Starr, who had changed the trial from one about habeas corpus to one about sanity, issued an order that she should not be confined. "Scholar" Kathryn Burns-Howard quipped: "We will never know Elizabeth's true mental state or the details of her family life."
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 658: When Elizabeth Packard returned to the home she shared with her husband in Manteno, Illinois, she found that the night before her release, her husband had rented their home to another family, sold her furniture, had taken her money, notes, wardrobe and children, and had left the state. She appealed to the Supreme Courts of both Illinois and Massachusetts, to where her husband had taken her children, but had no legal recourse, as married women in these states at the time had no legal rights to their property or children (see Coverture). As such, the Anti-Insane Asylum Society was formed.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 660: With that, she did not go back to her former life, but became a national celebrity of sorts, publishing "an armload of books and criss-crossing the United States on a decades-long reform campaign", not only fighting for married women's rights and freedom of speech, but calling out against "the power of insane asylums". She became what some scholars call "a publicist and lobbyist for better insanity laws". As scholar Kathryn Burns-Howard has argued, Packard reinvented herself in this rôle, earning enough to support her children and even her estranged husband, from whom she remained separated for the rest of her life. Ultimately, moderate supporters of women's rights in the northern U.S. embraced her, weaving her story into arguments about slavery, framing her experience as a type of enslavement and even arguing in the midst of the Civil War that a county in the midst of freeing African-American slaves should do the same for others who suffered from abusive husbands. Some argue that she seemed oblivious to her racial prejudice in arguing that white women had a "moral and spiritual nature" and suffered more "spiritual agony" than formerly enslaved African-Americans. Even so, others say that her story provided "a stirring example of oppressed womanhood" that others did not.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 673: Étienne Jodelle est un poète et dramaturge français, né en 1532 et mort en juillet de 1573 à Paris. Membre de la Pléiade, il s´efforcera de revitaliser les principes du théâtre antique à la Renaissance. Il est le premier à introduire l´alexandrin dans la tragédie à son époque, notamment avec Cléopâtre captive, la première tragédie à l´antique, ainsi que L´Eugène dans la comédie, reconnu comme un précurseur du théâtre qui naît dans la seconde moitié du XVIe siècle, une période convulsive qui verra ses incertitudes incarnées dans son œuvre L´Eugène est une comédie humaniste d´Étienne Jodelle, représentée pour la première fois en 1553, à l´Hôtel de Reims, en même temps que Cléopâtre captive. C´est la première comédie à l´antique en langue française, même si certains de ses éléments sont encore proches de la farce : en cela, elle constitua un moment fort dans l´histoire de la Pléiade. Jodelle on piipunrassin näköinen.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 734: Peter Nygårds vänner tex Aira Samulin känner sig lite obekväma om Peters svarta sida. Peter Nygårds aptit på unga kvinnor var bottenlös. Peter Nygård var en skitstövel, säger en ex-anställd. Men nu avslöjer HBL Peters gula sida! Peter Nygård ser ut som en av de kinesiska hjältarna i Marvels nya film. Peter Nygård i sina jetset-millionär-modekungadagar såg ut precis som Ronny Chieng med Akwafina, spelandes Jon-Jon i Marvel´s fantasifilm Tio ringar. Peter sku säkert ha betalt Awkwafinas tandläkarräkningar. Jag med! After Hours, Awkwafina Gets Naked And Watches ASMR Videos. But she has not leaked them as yet, aw shucks. (Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR) is a pleasurable, tingling sensation usually felt in the brain, but can spread to the rest of the body. It frequently occurs when watching things such as demonstrations, foreign accents, explanations, naked Asian ladies, etc., and it´s a generally wonderful feeling. I´ve experienced ASMR all my life, but never knew it had a name until now, so hooray I guess!)
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 747: »Ottaen huomioon kysymyksessä olevan kirjallisuuden laajuuden tuloksen täytyy jäädä vaillinaiseksi, mutta sellaisenakin teos silti kyennee raoittamaan sitä ovea, jonka takana englanninkielisen kirjallisuuden runotar hallitsee.»
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 33: Haiku (jap. 俳句) on japanilainen kolmisäkeinen runo, jossa on 17 tavua. Tavut on jaettu säkeiksi suhteessa 5-7-5. Haikujen aiheet liittyvät yleensä luontoon, ja runot ovat asultaan pelkistettyjä, mietelauseenomaisia. Haikut kirjoitetaan japaniksi perinteisesti yhdelle pystyriville, mutta länsimaisittain kolmelle vaakariville.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 77: DEFY your family FUCK another's mate KILL the sick OBEY your instincts
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 124: "Through the wrath of the LORD of hosts is the land darkened, and the people shall be as the fuel of the fire: no man shall spare his brother. And he shall snatch on the right hand, and be hungry; and he shall eat on the left hand, and they shall not be satisfied: they shall eat every man the flesh of his own arm." -- Isaiah 9:19-20
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 132: "I will not feed you: that that dieth, let it die; and that that is to be cut off, let it be cut off; and let the rest eat every one the flesh of another." -- Zechariah 11:9
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 143: "Heap on wood, kindle the fire, consume the flesh, and spice it well, and let the bones be burned. Then set it empty upon the coals thereof, that the brass of it may be hot, and may burn, and that the filthiness of it may be molten in it, that the scum of it may be consumed. She hath wearied herself with lies, and her great scum went not forth out of her: her scum shall be in the fire. -- Ezekiel 24:10-12
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 174: Marcion of Sinope (/ˈmɑːrʃən, -ʃiən, -siən/; Greek: Μαρκίων [note 1] Σινώπης; c. 85 – c. 160) was an early Christian theologian, an evangelist, and an important figure in early Christianity.Marcion preached that the benevolent God of the Gospel who sent Jesus Christ into the world as the savior was the true Supreme Being, different from and opposed to the malevolent demiurge or creator god, identified with the Hebrew God of the Old Testament. He considered himself a follower of Paul the Apostle, whom he believed to have been the only true apostle of Jesus Christ, a doctrine called Marcionism. Marcion published the earliest extant fixed collection of New Testament books, making him a vital figure in the development of Christian history.[citation needed] Early Church Fathers such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Tertullian denounced Marcion as a heretic, and he was excommunicated by the church of Rome around 144. He published the first known canon of Christian sacred scriptures, which contained ten Pauline epistles (the Pastoral epistles weren't included) and a shorter version of the Gospel of Luke (the Gospel of Marcion). This made him a catalyst in the process of the development of the New Testament canon by forcing the proto-orthodox Church to respond to his canon. Varmaan Marcion oli sitten yhtä persepää kuin Puovoli.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 242: Uskonnot ovat kuin kiiltomatoja, ne loistavat vain pimeässä.Arttu SchopenhauerMKILL!
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 266: Entäs Turmiolan Tommi? Sillä nää uskonkymysyxet nousee tosiaan vasta kuopan reunalla. Uskonto ja kuolema on tietysti alun alkaen jo vanhat kamut. Eka töräys on referaatti Pascalin vedosta, eli et jumalan turvalle vedon lyönyt voi hävitä vain panoxen, voittokertoimella ääretön. Kiitos osanotosta mutta tämä arpa ei voita. On tässä kyllä eräitä ongelmia siltikin. Jos todennäköisyys on nolla, odotusarvo ei ole ääretön vaan nolla. Sitäpaizi mitä jos ravit voittaa Allahin razukko? Pitäis sijoittaa kaikille yhtä epätodennäköisille kontendereille jotka lupaa ikuista osinkoa, mistä ne eivät enää yhtään tykkääkään. Saattaa tulla näpeille joka iikalta. Ei hemmetti, ei tää kyllä pelitä.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 326: Opit ja uskonnot ovat joutilaan ajankulua.Kai NieminenMKILL!
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 330: Ideologiat ja uskonnot käyvät alibeista, ne pyhittävät keinot.Eugene IonescoMKILL!
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 345: Kokoavasti voi sanoa Sosulin eli Tarmon rojupurkista, että Tarmolla on Vaakkuakin paljon enemmän ateistisia ja muita epäkunnioittavia kannanottoja. Sitä se hyvinvointi, tasapäistyminen ja maallistuminen on teettänyt. Ainoa uskontoa peukuttava naaras noin 4:stä oli Äiti Teresa, jonka J. oli kuzunut uskollisuuteen, kuuluisuus tuli windfallina. Kuin myös Jesselle.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 556: Who have not yet forgotten quite Jotka muistaa vielä miten kova
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 579: Myös Vilpittömän Nahkurin Runous-nettiradion kuudes sarja on juuri alkanut, ja tämän päivän jaksossa entinen runoilijapalkinnon saaja Carola Anna Tussua pohtii lähetysennusteen rukousmaista laatua: ‘There’s never been a time when you could just say anything’: Frank Skinner on free speech, his bullying shame – and knob [kyrvännuppi] jokes. This poetry-loving, religious knob has deep regrets about some of his comedy: either the standup comic has grown up, or he was never as laddish as his image suggested. Nearing death and last judgment, he is hoping to perform a “cleaner, cleverer” kind of act, one that would let him look straight at the crowd and – perhaps for the first time in his life – not see anybody squirming in their seat in discomfort. “It was a struggle,” the 65-year-old says with a grin, “because I realised that I seem to think in knob jokes. And I have done since I was about 13. In the West Midlands, that was how people communicated!”
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 581: 30 Years of Dirt is not, then, a compendium of Skinner’s best sex gags – of which there have been plenty over the years. Rather, it’s a comedic journey through his attempt to de-smutify his brain for the modern woke audience, a kind of personal challenge: can he even be funny without talking about penises? (No, he gets boring as a prayer book.)
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 583: “I don’t think there’s ever been a time when you could just say anything.” He recalls an early comedy show – this must have been in the late 80s – where the host apologised to the crowd after Skinner had performed some risque sexual material. “He said I’d never play at the venue again – and then he launched into a load of racist material and brought the house down. Everyone’s got their own standards and restraints. But I think it’s been good for me to keep questioning what I say. It’s made me think more positively about racist jokes and not so much about penises. My knob is not working anymore BTW, I'm 65. We’re both deeply ashamed. Can't lift our eye to the public.”
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 587: But recently that position has shifted a little. Last year he published A Comedian’s Prayer Book, which features him talking to the supreme being in his typically down-to-earth way (“I always liked thinking Jesus' knob hung out from women's clothes with sinners. It made me feel potentially understood”). “One of the things religion has suffered from is being spoken of in grave terms constantly. I seriously think it is a joke." Another boring thing about Skinner: he’s been a teetotaller since he reached his 60s. He got a kid at 55, who must now be, wait, 35? No, Buzz is just 10. I have only recently realized I'm not the main character here, but just an extra in a bigger scene. “Hitting kids … that’s another of those things that have stopped,” Evolution is what Skinner is all about – animals can change and they can grow, it just takes millions of years. When he made his jokes about racism and homophobia, he says, there was a slight backlash from the left. They hadn't stopped hitting lads, the sods. Frank Skinner’s 30 Years of Dirt is at the Assembly Roxy, Edinburgh, from 4 to 28 August. For more information and tickets go to frankskinnerlive.com.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 591: A dog is not intelligent. Never trust an animal that’s surprised by its own farts.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 603: My mate has the campest walk ever. We did a sponsored 13-mile walk once and I tied his shoelaces together as a joke. He didn’t even notice.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 633: The Scriblerus Club was an informal association of authors, based in London, that came together in the early 18th century. They were prominent figures in the Augustan Age of English letters. The nucleus of the club included the satirists Jonathan Swift and Alexander Pope. Other members were John Gay, John Arbuthnot, Henry St. John and Thomas Parnell.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 676: Eläviä on enemmän kuin kuolleita ja lisää tuppaa joka perseestä.Eugene Ionesco (not)MKILL!
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 765: Christine Chubbuck (August 24, 1944 – July 15, 1974) was an American television news reporter who worked for WTOG and WXLT-TV in Sarasota, Florida. She was the first person to die by suicide on a live television broadcast. She lamented to co-workers that her 30th birthday was approaching, and she was still a virgin who had never been on more than two dates with a man. Co-workers said she tended to be brusque and defensive whenever they made friendly gestures toward her. She was self-deprecating, criticizing herself constantly and rejecting any compliments others paid her. The film reel of the restaurant shooting had jammed and would not run, so Chubbuck shrugged it off and said on-camera, "In keeping with the WXLT practice of presenting the most immediate and complete reports of local blood and guts news, TV 40 presents what is believed to be a television first. In living color, an exclusive coverage of an attempted suicide." She drew the .38-caliber Smith & Wesson Model 36 revolver and shot herself behind her right ear. Chubbuck fell forward violently and the technical director faded the broadcast rapidly to black. "The crux of the situation was that she was a 29-year-old girl who wanted to be married and who wasn't," Simmons said in 1977.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 780: Claudel was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature in six different years. Another hopeless Nobel wannabe, politically too suspect.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 791: Facit: Yli 90% julkkixista ja kirjailijoista on narsisteja. Se on suorastaan työhönottovaatimus. Omaan napaan tuijotus on suotavaa.
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 293: Weakness: arrogance, always needing another battle to fight
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 524: Mixi termiittiapinoita on just noi 12 Jungin arkkityyppiä (tai 16, give or take a few)? Ilmeinen selitys on että ne on niinkö termiittien kasteja. Platonkin sanoi että hyvin järjestetyssä valtiossa on säätyjä, joissa jokainen saa rauhassa erikoistua omaan hommaansa. Sitä se tarkoittaa kun sanotaan et löydä izesi. Mut varo: kun löydät izesi, voit hukata huumorintajusi. Näin kävi rotevalle Mariannelle.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 119: The magical community is treated as “more special” than the “normal” community, which is treated with distrust and disdain. Although I love the Weasleys, it’s entirely possible that Mr. Weasley’s obsession with non-magical ephemera could be viewed as the anthropologist exploring a primitive culture. Mr. Weasley collects artifacts because he is fascinated with them, not because he wants to understand non-magical culture better. That should be totally off-putting to the liberal crowd, but they missed it. They are too busy justifying the racism and bigotry as the product of the “pure blood” families.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 125: There is bigotry and racism, and I do not for one second believe that JK Rowling thought hard enough about the issue to make it the product of the “pure blood” crowd. I believe that for her it was all about making Harry and his friends “special.” They had obstacles to overcome, like Hermione with her non-magical parents and the Weasleys, who were generally despised for being not very serious (literally the red-headed step children of the wizarding world.” There were “squibs.” Name-calling and bullying in this school are as common as in the “normal world,” only often the bullying comes much closer to insulting one’s parents than it does in the outside world.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 127: There was the elitist attitude that the people in the outside world would “just not understand,” or they would be “scared and mistrustful” of the wizarding world. This is a very liberal mindset: they are “progressive,” and the rest of us will not understand their grand scheme.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 153:

There are many many more that I can´t recall just now. Kyle has not filled out their profile, but they look like male.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 178: Does it sound interesting if a protagonist is meant to have little to no relevance in the plot? How can a protagonist not have any relevance to the plot? Whichever character you do give relevance to becomes the protagonist.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 180: The idea of writing a book is so you can break all your rules, personal or not. The point of a writer is to write about characters you probably could never become or want to become. The best writers write outside of themselves. But with that written, not all writers write fiction. Some write memoirs or autobiographies. But maybe the personal rule they are breaking is publishing their personal life.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 181: But to answer your question: I do have some personal rules like all my main characters can’t wear glasses ‘cause that’s geeky and I’m geeky (I also wear glasses). But another one is that the main character has to be a smoker. That’s not so true anymore, so I broke that one.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 185: Turveloita ja/tai repukoita wannabeita piisaa Quorassa vaikka kuinka. Pitäis kai munkin tehä oma lista, mutten tee, musta asioiden paneminen tärkeysjärjestyxeen on yhtä paha virhe kuin E.T.:n vainoama ajattelu. Jos sä pystyt sen oikeasti tekemään, se voi osoittaa ezun moraaliset dimensiot on vinossa. Sulla on hintalappu vaikka isoäidille. Tai sizä ehkä ajattelet et raamattu on ihan ykkönen, sanotaan siellä mitä sanotaan, eli sun järjestys on lexikografinen. Parempi kun tekisit kuin E.T. ja et ajattelis ollenkaan.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 239: Hovioikeuden enemmistön mukaan huomioon ottaen asianosaisten välisten yhteydenottojen aiheen ja asianomistajan saapuminen hänelle entuudestaan tuntemattoman vastaajan seurassa asuntoon, asianomistajan kertomusta ei pelkästään ilman tukevaa muuta näyttöä voitu pitää riittävänä perusteena hänen kieltäytymiselleen yhdynnästä.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 278: Lopuxi voi todeta että ankaroittavia perusteita joutuu perustelemaan mutta liventäviä ei tarvize. Jos ämmä on ärsyttävä huora se on lieventävää, jos äijä on vanha likainen tai mamu se on raskauttavaa. Sodassa ja rakkaudessa on kaikki keinot lieventäviä.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 510: My name is not Ted but Brené Brown [don't miss the self-important accent aigu on the e]. I'm a tense social science worker lady mom who also wants to be a scientist. I'm here to give a motivational talk to you other tense American World I well-to-do lady moms.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 514: And when you ask people about connection, the stories they told me were about disconnection. I need to figure out what this is. And it turned out to be shame. And shame is really easily understood as the fear of disconnection: Is there something about me that, if other people know it or see it, that I won't be worthy of connection? Is my butt not smelling right to the other bees? Will they kill me?
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 518: What underpinned this shame, this "I'm not good enough," -- which, we all know that feeling: "I'm not white enough. I'm not thin enough, rich enough, beautiful enough, smart enough, promoted enough." The thing that underpinned this was excruciating vulnerability. This idea of, in order for connection to happen, we have to allow ourselves to be seen, really seen, butts bare.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 530: Well, I have a vulnerability issue. I'm not sufficiently vulnerable. And I know that vulnerability is the core of shame and fear and our struggle for worthiness, but it appears that it's also the birthplace of joy, of creativity, of belonging, of love. And I think I have a problem, and I need some help." And I said, "But here's the thing: no family stuff, no childhood shit, that's way too vulnerable."
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 541: Just stop and, instead of catastrophizing what might happen, say, "I'm just so grateful, because to feel this vulnerable means I'm alive." That's all I have. I mean I'm enough, and so're you, although not quite so much enough as me. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 570: Sen jälkeen suomalaisten nuorten elämässä moni asia on muuttunut. Enää kioskilla ei tarvitse notkua jatkuvasti, koska voi notkua myös verkossa. Heittää paskaa tuulettimeen digitaalisesti.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 622: Suomalaisten suurten kaupunkien nimet ovat kiinalaisia, kuten Xinjingin kaupunki, jonne Nooran äiti muuttaa. Se on entinen Kajjaani. Veden alle joutuneesta Helsingistä tulee intialaisten ja kiinalaisten snorklaajien asuttama Halsingih, jossa suomalaiset ovat kummallisia aboriginaaleja. Autojen sijasta kulkuneuvoina toimivat sähkövoimalla kulkevat potkulaudat ja valaisimina käytetään valoa tuottavia perskärpäsiä. Muovihauta voidaan tulkita kritiikiksi nykyistä kulutusyhteiskuntaa kohtaan. Sieltä löytyy paljon käyttökelpoista tavaraa, jonka ihmiset ovat tosta vaan heittäneet pois. Yksi selkeimmistä eettisistä kannanotoista tiemestareilta tulee esiin Nooran ja Senjan keskustelussa, kun he ovat tutkimassa muovihautaa ja etsimässä sieltä jotain käyttökelpoista. Tytöt ihmettelevät, miksi entismaailman ihmiset ovat heittäneet pois toimivia muovitavaroita.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 632: Korni pianisti Greg "Vladi" Garrard on eritellyt erilaisia suhtautumistapoja ympäristöön, joista teoksessa ilmentyvät kornukopianismi, syväekologia ja heideggerilainen ekofilosofia. Kornukopianistit vähättelevät ympäristöongelmia eivätkä tunnusta luonnon itseisarvoa, vaan näkevät sen ainoastaan ihmiselle mahdollisesti tuottaman hyödyn kautta. Syväekologiassa luonto ei ole ihmisen resurssi vaan arvokas sellaisenaan, eikä ihmisellä ole erityisasemaa maapallolla. Heideggerilaisen ekofilosofian mukaan ihmisellä on velvollisuus antaa maailman olla ja paljastua sellaisenaan pakottamatta sitä omaa etuaan ajaviin merkityksiin. Molemmissa on kaikuja buddhalaisesta filosofiasta, joka korostaa olemisen itseisarvoa ja painottaa asioiden hyväksymistä sellaisena kuin ne ovat.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 659: She has been regarded as India's Greta Thunberg, though she does not like the usage of this term. She is not an autist after all.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 669: India, the Harvard International Review reiterates its policy of not endorsing the
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 189: Vitun pelle, ällöttävä hienomaistaja. Tollanen nirsoilu ja valikointi on yxinomaan etovaa. Sitoo Baudelairen runot hienoihin nahkaselkäisiin covereihin. Erityisesti kehaisi Callen Balkonki-runoa (1857), kun siinä joka värssy alkaa ja loppuu nokkelasti samalla säkeellä. Calle ei tehnyt päältä tähettä, säästi päätä missä voi.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 196: At its presentation at the 1869 Salon, this enigmatic group portrait was overwhelmingly misunderstood despite the obvious reference to Majas at the Balcony of Francisco Goya. "Close the shutters!" was the sarcastic reaction of the caricaturist Cham while another critic attacked "this gross art" and Manet who "lowered himself to the point of being in competition with the painters of the building trade".
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 199: It is not surprising then, that a painting which took such liberties with tradition, convention and realism so shocked its early public.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 206: And the Majas, they are not aristocratic ladies as their fine apparel may suggest; they lack refinement and dignity, though they are extremely attractive (particularly the one on the right, I would fuck her anytime). The artist calls them majas not mujeres. A patent wink to the same artist's best known work La Maja desnuda from the same year. They are no ordinary women. They are courtesans! Sluts, not to make too fine a point on it. Goya makes a subtle criticism on the society of his time. In Majas on a Balcony, Goya combines an ironic treatment of material with an impressionistic technique, a mode of presentation, which succeeds in creating a piece of social criticism. Buaahahahaha don't make me laugh!
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 264: Me sanottiin usein tuhoutumattomia juttuja
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 407: Can they be lost for ever? Will they not come round
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 409: Of future worlds, from the abyss we cannot sound?
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 423: We spoke eternal things that cannot die —
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 486: Will they be reborn from a gulf we may not sound,
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 521: For where, if not in your loved flesh and tender heart,
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 652: John has just published another beautifully prepared edition of the "North Atlantic Review," a literary magazine with choice offerings in poetry, essays, short stories, and photos. Endorsed by Edward Eriksson, Literary Presentations, July 11, 2011, Edward worked with john in the same group.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 702: Lord Shimura is possibly named after Japanese actor Takashi Shimura ( 志村喬) who is noteworthy for his appearances in 21 of 30 films by Japanese director Akira Kurosawa (more than any other actor) including Rashomon (1950), Seven Samurai (1954) and Throne of Blood (1957).
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 751: The novel features a passionate romance between Rei Shimura and Hugh Glendinning, the Scottish lawyer. Though the romance was not very realistic, I think it added an exciting and entertaining element to the novel. The first person point-of-view from which the novel is narrated allows the audience to truly understand the good and the bad of Rei’s character. She is independent to a fault but extremely loyal. She wants to immerse herself in Japanese culture, yet she rejects the social norms of society when they conflict with her desires. She is passionate about her interest in history and antiques, but logical by staying on as a teacher. The contradictions make her human and contribute to the reality of the novel. While mystery was not entirely believable, it was in no way predictable and I genuinely found the plot to be exciting. The Salaryman’s Wife, fits into the detective fiction tradition as most closely as a cozy, however the urban setting and the inclusion of graphic sex scenes contradict that classification
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 753: While the immersed-in-Japan aspect of the book was well-researched and interesting (and accurate, as far as I could tell), the mystery and romance were not so well-done. For one thing, it was hard to care about the woman who got murdered, since we only saw her once and she wasn't that nice or interesting, and it wasn't clear why the protagonist cared enough about her to go and investigate the whole thing. Maybe it was the money. In addition, cliched attempts on the protagonists life seemed unrealistic, and when we finally discovered who the murderer was, it felt more like a random pulling of a number out of a hat than the one true solution.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 755: The romance also felt unrealistic. Maybe it was just hard for me to understand the protagonist sleeping with the guy after knowing him for a day or two, or maybe I just didn´t like either of them very well at all. But their "romantic encounters" seemed contrived, and their whole relationship seemed based on lust and mutual interest, and not really anything deeper.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 770: Lastly the main couples' relationship wasn't based on 'anything deeper', nor was it supposed to be. This is the first in a series so the relationship can develop, or not. Deeper deeper faster faster says faster Norie.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 773: The one stand-out annoyance for me was unexpectedly hitting upon yet another plot relying upon "rescuing" a female character from her sordid life of sex (or nearly-sex) work: hostessing, in this case. She's told she's "better" than that which means she should make less money doing something more honorable. It makes me want to write to the author and say she could do so much BETTER than write a book that hooks readers immediately with an erotically-charged story of sexual assault on a crowded train. I´m not mad at her, though, for giving the majority of readers what they want; just a pet peeve of mine.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 777: MikeL found it not that suspenseful and a bit cheesy. Reviewed in the United States on 25 January 2015. The crime story was so so. Some cheesy cliffhanging language. Characters and relationships were off. While an easy read, I have read much better crime novels.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 779: Barry A. Hudson says: Good writing and a good introduction to Japanese culture. I note than some Japanese criticize her works, but my comment would be that Japanese culture never likes to air its dirty laundry. I find her cultural observations right on the mark. I actually think she has great love and admiration for Japan and its people, but she occasionally does not pull her punches.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 787: Sujata, also Sujātā, Eugenie, well-born, was a farmer´s wife, who is said to have fed Gautama Buddha a bowl of kheer, a condensed milk-rice pudding, ending his six years of asceticism. Such was his emaciated appearance that she wrongly believed him to be a tree-spirit that had granted her wish of having a child. The gift provided him enough strength to cultivate the Middle Path, develop jhana, and attain Bodhi, thereafter becoming known as the Buddha. The story does not tell what the holy tree spirit said when Gautama ate his rice and curry.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 809: Sujatan äiti joutui ostamaan sille joka vuosi uuden kuumavesipullon. Her farts boiled bathwater. Reistä kynittyine kananpersetukkineen tuli yön yli alistettujen japsunaisten roolimalli. Rei stairu maxaa kampaajalla 6K yeniä. Voi ei, vingahtaa Rei tyytyväisenä. Rei kumartaa, lämmittää mikrossa lihaperunalaatikot, keittää teet ja järjestää lautaselle Yakuzan lahjapersikat. Sääli etten osaa kanjeja, on raivostuttavaa kun ei tiedä mitä izestä sanotaan. Reistä on tulossa julkkis hyvää kyytiä. Se on haikeaa, mutta hienoa. Ylläni oli niitä sun näitä lainahöyheniä. Tää kirja on niinniin tyttöjen. Tulee mieleen Richardsonin Pamela.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 35: Kuten olen monesti jo paasannut, kiitollisuus on vituttava ilmiö. Sehän on IOU-lappujen keräämistä, velanottoa ja velanperintää. Hyvin amerikkalaista luottomeininkiä. In god we trust, all others pay cash. Obrigado. Much obliged. They owe me SOOOOOOO much, sanoi Jill kun Niklas oli pelastettu tolppa-apinan perheestä Bostoniin itäeurooppalaisine leukapartoineen. Se on vittua. Hyvä teko kiittää ize izeään, ei siihen pitäis vaatia mitään velkakirjoja.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 76: In 1957, Rohn resigned his distributorship with AbundaVita and joined Nutri-Bio, another direct selling company. It was at this point that the company's founders, including Shoaff, started to mentor him. After this mentorship, Rohn built one of the largest organizations in the company. In 1960 when Nutri-Bio expanded into Canada, Shoaff and the other founders selected Rohn as a vice president for the organization.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 109: Other theories attributed to Eker include the concept that people unwilling to make major sacrifices in order to succeed "play the role" of the victim and deny that they have control of their own situations. Instead they should play the role of the perpetrator and take control of the victim. Another concept is that guilt prevents seeking wealth and that "thinking about wealth as a means to help others" relieves this guilt and enables wealth accumulation.[citation needed]. LOL.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 129: "Jos Clinton olisi nussinut hiäntä perseeseen niin hiän olis pitänyt suunsa kiinni. Kun se veti hiäntä suihin jäi Levinskyltä haavi auki. Bill Clinton ei ole se pelimies joka hänen sanotaan olevan. Jos hän olisi kääntänyt tytön ympäri virkahuoneessa ja nussinut hiäntä perseeseen tai edes pilluun takaata, koko juttua ei olisi tapahtunut." "No jaa, hän ei alistanut likkaa tarpeexi. Hän oli varovainen."
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 167: hänen perheestään tienaisi enää senttiäkään, jos hän uskaltaisi hiiskahtaakaan kenellekään niistä yhdestätoista suihinotosta. Yhdestätoista. Ei edes paakarin
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 180: siihen? Eikö se nyt ole täysin keinotekoista?"
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 211: An article Wylie wrote in 1951 in The Saturday Evening Post entitled "Anyone Can Raise Orchids" led to the popularization of this hobby—not just the rich, but gardeners of every economic level began experimenting with orchids.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 219: Gloria Grey was born Maria Dragomanovich in Portland, Oregon in 1909. She was educated in San Francisco, California. Her career was spent chiefly during the 1920s in Hollywood, and the 1940s in Argentina. She was given praise for her starring role in the 1924 adaptation of Gene Stratton-Porter's A Girl of the Limberlost, which garnered her the honor of being selected as one of the WAMPAS Baby Stars in 1924. She also sang Jingo etc kneeling beside two black-and-white kids in a tub, (but not the juicy parts), and alleged got arrested because of indecency. Grey was found deceased in bed at her mother's home in Hollywood, California on November 22, 1947, having succumbed to a two-month bout of influenza. She was survived by her husband, Argentine magazine editor Ramón Romero, and their daughter, whose name is unmentionable. 'Oh By Jingo' sung by Gloria Grey (colorized) Shortly Before Her Arrest...(Allegedly). "I din't know there were nude kids in the tub, a black male and a white female in fact." The little pickaninny boy looks slightly shocked.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 259:

Another Faunia

xxx/ellauri138.html on line 262: Caro Llewellyn said that "Philip Roth: The Biography" distorted his friendship with the novelist: "My intimacy with Philip was not in keeping with the story Blake was trying to make. Write." In the biography, Bailey identifies her by the pseudonym Mona. He describes how she and Roth went through each other and were physically intimate but never had sex because he was unable to, even after taking Viagra. But Llewellyn said the scene Bailey described never happened, not quite like that.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 263: Llewellyn - who declined to be interviewed by Bailey - said she was more upset by what was left out in the biography, making it seem like she was a marginal figure in Roth's life, an adventure that didn't work out. "My intimacy with Philip was not in keeping with the story Blake was trying to write " she said.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 266: Roth also gave Bailey copies of two self-published manus, "Notes to my Biographer," a 295-page rebuttal of his ex-wife Memoirs of Claire Bloom in 1996, and "Notes on a Slander-Monger", a response to the notes and interviews Miller had compiled.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 268: Literary history is full of moments of betrayal, when trusted confidants defied the wishes of the authors. Max Brod ignored Franz Kafka's order to burn his unpublished manus and diaries. Vladimir Nabokov and Philip Larkin's instructions to destroy the unpublished manus were rescinded by the heirs and executors, who not only retained but published them. Bailey did not publish Roths samizdats.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 271: "I am against the holocaust of anything," said Claire Bloom. Roth was invested serving much of his own paper trail, said Avishai. He started donated their papers to the Library of Congress in the 1970s, and the institution amassed some 25,000 articles from 1938 to 2001, including correspondence with Bloom, Updike, Saul Bellow and Cynthia Ozick. After Roth's death, the library acquired more material, including correspondence, drafts, research notes, autobiographical notes, and other personal effects. Vitun hamsteri.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 277:

Caro Lllewellyn, another Faunia in 2009. "I want to see you again," he said as he took my hand and kissed my cheek. He had an endless supply of screwball wisecracks.

xxx/ellauri138.html on line 294: Philip is buried at the Bard College Cemetery in upstate New York. He'd once considered "moving in" next to his parents at the Gomel Chesed Cemetery in Newark, New Jersey but there was no immediately close plot and the place had fallen into disrepair and Philip liked things to be very neat. I was thrilled to hear that Philip orchestrated every last detail of his own farewell. I was not invited.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 324: Odotuxenmukaisesti Milan Kundera on Pylly Rothin mukaan mainio. Siinä toinen kylmä kala, samanlainen tunnoton setämies.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 331: Ällöttäviä vaipanvaihtajia jotka kehuskelee vaimolla. Se on aivan luonnotonta Pyllyn mielestä. Jos S. on akateemisesti koulutettu nainen joka ei löydä izellensä työtä ja mies pystyy nipin napin pitämään paikastaan kiinni, mies mieluummin luopuu omastaan kuin sallii vaimonsa ajatella et sille nyt vaan sattui huonompi osa. He saattavat jopa ylpeillä sillä että tilanne oli kääntynyt nurinperin ja miehen oli jäätävä kotiin naisen mennessä töihin. Ranskalaisesta naisesta sellainen mies olisi vastenmielinen, jopa ranskalaisesta feminististä. Amerikkalaisesta mammanpoika jutkusetämiehestä nyt puhumattakaan.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 360: Erittäinkin totta, leukavasti laukaistu ja laittamattomasti sanottu, kiitos hrat Marx ja Engels, annetaan iso käsi heille! Näin jälkikäteen ajatellen on uskomatonta että toi päälaellaan seisonut ajatusmalli on voinut pysyä pystyssä niin kauan, ja että sillä vieläkin on termiittiapinoien joukossa miljoonia ellei miljardeja kannattajia. Mutta sen takana on vahva ääni kallon takaosasta, nimittäinkin narsismi. Dosto Dostojevskillä oli aivan sama vika, ja tunnetuimmat jenkkijutkukynäilijät ovat nekin samanlaisia idealistinarsisteja. Kerta kaikki muut te olette tajuntani tuotetta, mä en voi millään kuolla, sittenhän kaikki lopahtaisi siihen. Sittehän olis kaikki ihan merkityxetöntä, koska merkitys, c'est moi.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 77: kukaan ei saa sanotuksi kaikkea.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 89: Vaikka jostakin sanottaisiin: katso, tämä on uutta,
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 197: "Tässä haluan noteerata myös tähän teokseen liittyvän tuoreen elämyksen. Tulin ostaneeksi äänikirjan, jossa on luettu koko Idiootti venäjäksi, lähes 30 tuntia. Kuuntelin 1 osan eli noin 8 tuntia samalla kun korjasin erästä tietokoneohjelmaa."
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 222: (4) Ippolit tries to figure out the point of living for two weeks. On the one hand, why not just die now and get it over with? But on the other hand, he feels like it's actually only now that he has a death sentence of sorts that he has really started to live. (Which, okay, guys, remember the story Myshkin told about the condensed man and how full of life his last few hours must be? There is definitely more to the idea that the person who knows he is about to die lives a very full life at the end—as Dostoevsky himself experience at his staged execution.)
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 292: Vain V.P. Burenin "Pietarin sanomat"-lehdessä piti romaania Dostojevskin "epäonnistuneena" teoksena. Burenin piti romaania "kaunokirjallisena sepitelmänä, joka muodostui useista tyhmistä henkilöistä ja tapahtumista, joissa ei oltu kiinnitetty mitään huomiota niiden taiteelliseen tarkoitukseen". Burenin moitti kirjan tapahtumien ja näkymien luonnottomuutta ja satumaisuutta.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 302: Shtshedrin kirjoitti, että sen tehtävän edessä, jonka Dostojevski otti suorittaakseen, tunnetussa määrin "kalpenevat kaikki mahdolliset kysymykset naisten työstä, arvojen määräytymisestä, ajatuksen vapaudesta"... "Tämä, kirjoittaa satiirikko, niin sanotusti lopullinen päämäärä, johon nähden kaikkein radikaaleimmatkin kaikkien muiden yhteiskuntaa kiinnostavien kysymysten ratkaisut vaikuttavat vain väliasemilta". Mutta samalla Shtshedrin osoitti kiivaasti kirkuvia ristiriitoja, joita esiintyy Idiootissa, kuten myös muissa kirjailijan teoksissa. "Ja mitä sitten? huolimatta sellaisen tehtävän säteilyvoimasta, joka sokaisee kaikki tilapäiset edistyksen muodot, herra Dostojevski, kirjoitti Shtshedrin, vähääkään ujostelematta tuhoaa itse asiansa saattamalla häpeään apinoita, joiden ponnistukset ovat suuntautuneet samaan suuntaan, johon ilmeisesti pyrkii myös tekijä erittäin pätevällä päättelyllään. Halpa niin sanotun nihilismin pilkka ja häiritsevä halveksunta, jonka syyt aina jäävät selvittämättä, kaikki tämä värittää herra Dostojevskin tuotantoa rokonarpiseksi, täysin hänelle vieraan, ja korkeasta taiteellisesta tasosta kertovien kuvien ohella loihtii esiin kohtauksia, jotka
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 336: After much convincing Madeline realizes her mistake. Porphyro declares that the two should run away together, since now she knows he is her true love, and escape to a home he has prepared on the “southern moors.” They need to go now while the house is asleep so that her family does not murder him.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 376: Another way he went, and soon among Kuha katumusta kehiin, Aunee nuolemaan.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 407: If ceremonies due they did aright; Jos ne teki kaikki menot vaaditulla tavalla;
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 418: Pass by—she heeded not at all: in vain ettei se niistä huolinut, turhaan kökkivät
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 420: And back retir’d; not cool’d by high disdain, Saivat vetää tiehensä, ei tullut panoa,
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 421: But she saw not: her heart was otherwhere: Neito tuskin huomaa kun se muuta janoaa:
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 453: Against his lineage: not one breast affords Rotinkaista, selkään sille että roikaa!
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 472: “Then there ’s that old Lord Maurice, not a whit Siziellon vanha Mauri-herra, yhtä vihaisena
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 476: “And tell me how”—“Good Saints! not here, not here; Ja kerro miten - Voi vittu! ei, ei täällä!
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 521: “Thou canst not surely be the same that thou didst seem. Et taida olla sama jäbä jota ennen panin.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 524: “I will not harm her, by all saints I swear,” En rääkkääkkään, vannon kautta pyhimysten,
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 568: So saying, she hobbled off with busy fear. Tän sanottuaan mummo hoippu tiehensä,
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 603: Of fruits, and flowers, and bunches of knot-grass, Joissa oli kukkien ja mehiläisten kuvia,
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 631: But dares not look behind, or all the charm is fled. Muttei tohdi kazoa, ei taaxeen pälyillä.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 728: “Oh leave me not in this eternal woe, Laula lisää kulta, älä tolla lailla vaivaa
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 729: “For if thou diest, my Love, I know not where to go.” Liian aikaista ois maahan sua kaivaa."
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 749: “I curse not, for my heart is lost in thine, Ei sit muuta jää kuin vanha Auf Wiedesehn,
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 760: “Though I have found, I will not rob thy nest Ei tää ihan pikku homma ole kyllä,
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 822: Päävika näyttäs olevan toi nihilismi eli uskonnottomuus kimaramaisesti yhtyneenä jenkkiläiseen "sää pystyt vaikka mahdottomaan" charity-supermiesajatuxeen. Terveet on tyhmiä kun ne ei tiedä sitä, köyhä vinttikerran väki tyhmiä kun ne aina valittavat ("iänikuinen virsi"). "Olen kieltänyt Matrjonaa korjaamasta sitä pois. Minua on aina toteltu." Väärä kombinaatio! Missä luotto, missä positiivisuus? On oltava Korean, cool and Christian. Surikov on syypää omaan köyhyyteensä.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 858: Se aloitti oikixessa mut meni kirjakauppa-apulaisexi ja kääntyi päättäväisesti kirjallisuutta päin. 18vee se julkaisi pienen kokoelman Runoja (v 1800), jossa parasta olivat Runoilijan nautinnot ja Bernardilaissola.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 915: Il dit, s’éloigne… et, sans retour… Tän sanottuaan poistuu taaxe eikä palaa.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1075: Né le 28 frimaire an XII (20 décembre 1803) sous le Consulat, à Lyon, 62 rue Pas Étroit (actuelle rue du Bât-d'Argent), Pierre François Lacenaire est le quatrième enfant et le deuxième fils de Jean-Baptiste Lacenaire, bourgeois et négociant lyonnais, et de Marguerite Gaillard, qui connaît treize grossesses entre 1799 et 1809. Kyllä meni kesken kovasti, jopa riitti Jean-Baptistella yritystä siementää. Non désiré de ses parents, il souffre de se voir préférer son frère aîné Jean-Louis, né le 19 frimaire an VIII (10 décembre 1799), il a notamment un sentiment d'abandon de sa mère et sera spolié de son héritage par son père.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1156: Le philosophe Michel Foucault considérait que la notoriété de Lacenaire chez les Parisiens marquait la naissance d'un nouveau genre de bandit adulé, le criminel romantique bourgeois. Le roman La Voix Secrète de Michael Mention retrace les dernières semaines de sa vie.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1208: Strangely, Raskolnikov begins to feel alarmed at the thought that Porfiry (joku poliisi) might think he is innocent. But Porfiry's changed attitude is motivated by genuine respect for Raskolnikov, not by any thought of his innocence, and he concludes by expressing his absolute certainty that Raskolnikov is indeed the murderer.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1229: Enemmän kuin katujen kieli romaanissa kaikuu viihderomaanien klangi. Hempeilevien ja korrektien ilmausten takaa kuultaa taloudellinen ja psyykkinen hätä, joka dostojevskilaisesti kiihtyy usein suggestiiviseksi, paljastavaksi ryöpyksi tajunnan peräkammarista, jossa haisee kiihko, kaikuu kärsimys ja jonka ovenkarmeissa riippuu tarkoituksettomuus. Devuškin joutuu nöyryytetyksi työpaikallaan, koska hänen vaatteensa ovat kehnot. Devuškin ja Dobroselova kärsivät, mutta tuska on Köyhässä väessä maallista, olosuhteista johtuvaa, eikä ylly Dostojevskin myöhemmän tuotannon metafyysiseen riutumukseen.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1241: ”Taasko yksi Gogol”, puhisi Belinski. Romaani sai ristiriitaisen vastaanoton. Belinski ylisti, mutta useimmat muut kriitikot haukkuivat. Myöhemmin Belinski käänsi takkinsa ja alkoi hänkin väheksyä Dostojevskia. Tuli järkiinsä.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 64: In the fall of his senior year, while his fellow students immersed themselves in writing theses, applying to graduate schools or kicking back and enjoying the good life, Michael J. McCormack '74 was busy starting another brain holiday. McCormack says he and his brother Brian McCormack wanted to do something to celebrate to the highly successful 1973 Arab-Israeli conflict.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 73: Every November 21, the brothers incite people all over the world to take part in the celebration by saying "Hooray" to another 10 people. Its really cheap! No postage needed! McCormack himself can say "Hooray" in over 65 different languages, including Bantu, Inuit and Urdu. He can say "We won" in just two languages, American English and Hebrew, and "Haha you fuckers lost" in four, German, Arabic, Russian, and French.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 77: "Whenever I have a tough night, I just remember that I've been in personal contact (pirsuna pirsunalmente) with 1.1 billion people in the Republic of China, and that makes things easier," McCormack says. When he's not sending letters out across the world, McCormack spends his time writing and acting in professional pornographic productions.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 81: "We're selling out like crazy," McCormack says, meaning that he is searching for investors to take the show national. "We are actually planning another World Sellout Day to celebrate our dedication to the U.S. cause." Make America Great Again. I mean greater, it was always great, and is, of course. Don't try to trick me.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 84: Though the success and long life of World Hooray Day came as a surprise, McCormack says that he has wanted to write and act since he was seven years old and is not surprised to find himself doing it (= wanting) still decades later. McCormack, who took off for New York City immediately after graduation, said that his time at Harvard, though enjoyable, did not influence his career path.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 118: Following the outbreak of hostilities, both the United States and the Soviet Union initiated massive resupply efforts to their respective allies during the war, which led to a near-confrontation between the two nuclear-armed superpowers. After the 1967 six day war, the Egyptians said that a lasting peace could not be achieved without "withdrawal of the Israeli armed forces from all the territories occupied since 5 June 1967."
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 120: Golda Meir reacted to the overture by forming a committee to examine the proposal and vet possible concessions. When the committee unanimously concluded that Israel's interests would be served by full withdrawal to the internationally recognized lines dividing Israel from Egypt and Syria, returning the Gaza Strip and, in a majority view, returning most of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, Meir was angered and shelved the document next to her stash of knotted french letters and Joshua's foreskin collection. The United States was infuriated by the cool Israeli response to Egypt's proposal, and Joseph Sisco informed Yitzhak Rabin that "Israel would be regarded responsible for rejecting the best opportunity to reach peace since the establishment of the state." Israel responded to Jarring's plan also on February 26 by outlining its readiness to make some form of withdrawal, say in some New York bank, while declaring it had no intention of returning to the pre-June 5, 1967 lines.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 124: Yom Kippur was actually a bad choice of day by Sadat, for Arabs were still weak after Ramadan, while Israeli women were staying home and men were in synagogues, so the roads were free and reserves were quickly rounded up from the yeshivas. Prior to the war, Kissinger and Nixon consistently warned Meir that she must not be responsible for initiating a Middle East war. On October 6, 1973, the war opening date, Kissinger told Israel not to go for a preemptive strike, and Meir grumblingly confirmed to him that Israel would not.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 126: Other developed nations [who? were there any?], being more dependent on OPEC oil, took more seriously the threat of an Arab oil embargo and trade boycott, and had stopped supplying Israel with munitions. As a result, Israel was totally dependent on the United States for military resupply, and particularly sensitive to anything that might endanger that relationship. After Meir had made her decision, at 10:15 am, she met with American ambassador Kenneth Keating in order to inform the United States that Israel did not intend to preemptively start a war. It would be just an accident. An electronic telegram with Keating's report on the meeting was sent to the United States at 16:33 GMT (6:33 pm local time). A message arrived later from United States Secretary of State Henry Kissinger saying, "Don't preempt." At the same time, Kissinger also urged the Soviets to use their influence to prevent war, contacted Egypt with Israel's message of non-preemption, and sent messages to other Arab governments to enlist their help on the side of moderation. These late efforts were futile. According to Henry Kissinger, had Israel struck first, it would not have received "so much as a nail".
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 128: The Soviets started an airlift of arms to Syria and Egypt. The American global interest was to prove that Soviet arms could not dictate the outcome of the fighting, by supplying Israel. Kenneth Pollack is a Jew so I would not trust his accounts of the war events. Saad el Shazly was on the other side, so hardly more trustworthy as a witness. Pientä epäselvyyttä oliko Egyptin 3. armeijakunta oikeasti aivan motissa, vai oliko mukana ehkä Kissingerin juonittelua, eze saisi kunnian Israelin pysäytyxestä ja tällä lailla Egyptin lipsumaan jenkkipuolelle. Mikä sitten ajan kanssa onnistuikin.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 130: The Arabs committed a lot of atrocities on Israeli troops, like clipped their fingernails and used them as ashtrays (the troops, not the clippings.) One Moroccan volunteer was caught with a sack full of Israeli body parts to take home as souvenirs. It turned out to be Joshua's foreskin bonanza. No reports of corresponding atrocities from the Israeli side.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 153: Who is the Messiah the Jews are expecting to come? Why did the Jews reject Yeshua (Jesus) as their Messiah? These two questions often seem a mystery to many Christians as they read the Bible and study the prophets. Before Yeshua, the Jews were waiting for the Messiah, but when Yeshua came and died without more ado, he did not fulfill this expectation.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 161: Tää oli Moshelta hyvä veto sikäli että nää lisäyxet päihittää kristinuskon tärkeimmät vetolaastarit, lunastuskaupan luottokortin ja taivastoivon. Maimonides further explains in his work on the Halakhic code, the Yad haHazaqa (“The Strong Hand”), also known as the Mishne Torah (Second Torah) the view of redemption and the role Messiah will play. Maimonides summarizes the Jewish expectation of the Messiah. But the expectation of Messiah, is not limited to Maimonides comments, quotes from the Talmud, Targum, Midrash, Zohar and other writings give us a vivid picture of the expectation in the Jewish world of the times of Messiah. Messianic expectation in Rabbinic times (A.D.135-1750) and in the time of Yeshua may have changed over the years. For example in the time of Yeshua, The Temple existed and Israel was not scattered abroad as is the case today. In the days of Maimonides, there was no Israel and no Temple, and Jews were persecuted in Europe. Here we quote from Raphael Patai’s work, The Messiah Texts on pages 322-327, his translation of the Mishne Torah, Maimonides writes the following.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 163: King Messiah will arise in the future and will restore the kingship of David to its ancient condition, to its rule as it was at first. And he will rebuild the Temple and gather the exiled of Israel. And in his days all the laws will return as they were in the past. They will offer up sacrifices, and will observe the Sabbatical years and the jubilee years with regard to all the commandments stated in the Torah. And he who does not believe in him, or he who does not await his coming, denies not only the [other] prophets, but also the Torah and Moses our Master. For, behold, the Torah testifies about him [the Messiah], as it is written,
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 169: I see him but not now ((Num. 24:17), this refers to David; I behold him but not nigh (ibid.) this refers to King Messiah; A star shall step forth out of Jacob (ibid.) this refers to King David; A star shall step forth out of Jacob (ibid.), this refers to David; and a scepter shall rise out of Israel (ibid.) this refers to King Messiah…
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 171: And think not that the Messiah must perform signs and portents and bring about new things in the world, or that he will resuscitate the dead, or the like. Not so. For, behold, R. Akiba was one of the greatest of the sages of the Mishna, and he was a follower of King Ben Koziba [Bar Kokhba], and he said about him that he was King Messiah. And he and the sages of his generation thought that he was King Messiah, until he was slain because of the sins. As soon as he was slain it became evident to them that he was not the Messiah. And the sages had asked of him neither sign nor a portent. And the essence of the matter is that the laws and ordinances of this Torah are forever and ever, and one must neither add to them or subtract from them.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 175: It should not come to one’s mind that in the days of the Messiah anything in the customary order of the world will be annulled, or that there will be something new in the order of Creation. For the world will continue in its path. And that which Isaiah said, the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid (Isa. 11:6), is but an allegory and a riddle. The true meaning of it is that Israel will dwell in safety with the wicked of the idolaters who are likened to a wolf and a leopard….And all of them will return to faith of truth, and they will neither rob nor despoil, but will eat the things which are permitted, in pleasure, together with Israel, as it is written, The lion shall eat straw like the ox (Isa. 11:7). And likewise, all the similar things said about the Messiah are but allegories. And in the days of the Messiah it will become known to everybody what thing the allegory signified and to what thing it alluded.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 177: The sages said that the only difference between this world and the days of the Messiah will be with regard to the enslavement to the kingdoms. It appears from the plain meaning of the words of the prophets that at the beginning of the days of the Messiah, there will be the war of Gog and Magog. And that prior to the war of Gog and Magog, a prophet will arise to straighten Israel and prepare their hearts, as it is written, Behold, I will send to you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord (Mal. 4:5) And he will come not to declare the pure impure, or the impure pure; not to declare unfit those who are presumed to be fit, nor to declare fit those who are held to be unfit; but for the sake of peace in the world….And there are those among the sages who say that prior to the coming of the Messiah will come Elijah. But all these things and their likes, no man can know how they will be until they will be. For they are indistinct in the writings of the prophets. Neither do the sages have a tradition about these things. It is rather, a matter of interpretation of the Biblical verses. Therefore there is a disagreement among them regarding these matters. And in any case, these are mere details which are not of the essence of the faith. And one should definitely not occupy oneself with the matter of legends, and should not expatiate about the midrashim that deal with these and similar things. And one should not make essentials out of them. For they lead neither to fear nor to love [of God]. Neither should one calculate the End. The sages said, “May the spirit of those who calculate the End be blown away” But let him wait and believe in the matter generally, as we have explained.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 179: In the days of King Messiah, when his kingdom is established and all Israel are gathered into it, the descent of all of them will be confirmed by him through the Holy Spirit which will rest upon him, as it is written, And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver, and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver ( Mal. 3:3), And he will first purify the Children of Levi and will say: “This is of priestly descent, and this is of Levitic descent.” And he will reject those who are not descended of Israel, as it written, And the Tirshatha [governor] said to them that they should not eat the most holy things till there stood up a priest with Urim and Thummin (Ezra 2:63) From this you learn that the presumption of descent will be confirmed, and those with established descent will be announced by the Holy Spirit. And he will establish the descent not from Israel [in general] but from each tribe and tribe. For he will announce that this one is from such and such a tribe, and this one from such and such a tribe….
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 181: The sages and the prophets yearned for the days of the Messiah not in order they should rule over the whole world, and not in order they should lord it over the idolaters, not in order that the nations should elevate them, and not in order that they should eat and drink and rejoice; but in order they should devote themselves to the Torah and its wisdom, and that there be nobody to oppress them and to negate, so they should merit life in the World to Come…
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 197: The rabbis have taught; The Holy One, blessed be He, will say to Messiah ben David, may he be revealed soon in our day!; “Ask of Me anything, and I shall give it to you, for it is written, The Lord said unto me, Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee, ask of Me and I will give the nations for thy inheritance (Psalms 2:7-8)” And when he will see that Messiah ben Joseph will be slain, he will say before Him: “Master of the World! I ask nothing of you except life! God will say to him: “Even before you said, ‘life,’ your father David prophesied about you as it is written, He asked life of Me, Thou gavest it him (Ps. 21:5) Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52a
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 205: The idea of a “Suffering Messiah” to many in Judaism is a Christian concept, this is not the case however. In some rabbinical traditions, the Messiah, who was one of the first thoughts of God, is in heaven waiting for the day of redemption. In heaven, Elijah and the patriarchs attend to, him. In one scene, from the Talmud the Messiah sits at the gates of Rome unwinding and winding bandages of the suffering and poor, waiting for the call.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 207: R. Y’hoshu’a ben Levi once found Elijah standing at the entrance of the cave or R. Shim’on ben Yohai…He asked him: “When will the Messiah come?” He said to him: “Go, ask him himself” “And where does he sit? “At the entrance of the city [of Rome]” “And what are his marks?” “His marks are that he sits among the poor who suffer of diseases, and while all of them unwind and rewind[the bandages of all their wounds] at once, he unwinds and rewinds them one by one, for he says, ‘Should I be summoned, there must be no delay.’” R. Y’hoshu’a went to him and said to him; “Peace be unto you, my Master and Teacher!” He said to him: “Peace unto you, Son of Levi!” He said to him: when will the Master come?” He said to him: “Today.” R. Y’hoshu’a went to Elijah, who asked him; “What did he tell you?” R. Y’hoshu’s said “[He said to me:] Peace be unto you, Son of Levi!” Elijah said to him: “[By saying this] he assured the World to Come for you and your father.” R. Y’hoshu’a then said to Elijah: “The Messiah lied to me, for he said ‘today I shall come,’ and he did not come.” Elijah said: “This is what he told you: 'Today', If you but hearken to His voice’ (Ps. 95:7) (Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 98a)[12]
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 224: Elijah said to Rav Y’huda the brother of Rav Sala the Pious: “The world will exist for no less than eighty-five jubilees [that is, 85*50 = 4250 years], and in the last jubilee the Son of David will come.” He asked him: “In its beginning or at its end?” He answered: “I do not know.” [Rav Y’huda then asked:] “Will it [the last jubilee] be complete or not?” He said to him: “I do not know.” Rav Ashi said; “This is what Elijah told him; ‘Until the last jubilee expect him not; from then on expect him.’” So no hurry, there's another 260 jubilees (1300 years) or thereabouts to go. Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 97b[14]
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 238: Behold I will make Jerusalem a cup of staggering unto all the peoples round about (Zech. 12:2). What is “cup of staggering”? [It means] that He will in the future make peoples drink the cup of staggering of blood….when they [Gog and Magog] go up there, what do they? They assign two warriors to every one of the Children of Israel. Why? So that they should not escape. When the heroes of Judah ascend and reach Jerusalem, they pray in their heart…In that hour the Holy One, blessed be He, gives heroism to Judah and they draw their weapons and smite those men on their right and on their left, and slay them (Midrash Tehillim, Psalm 119, ed. Buber pp. 488-89)
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 240: Two men remained in the camp. The name of one of them was Eldad, and then name of the other Medad. And the Holy Spirit descended upon them…and both prophesied as one and said: “In the End of Days, Gog and Magog and their armies will fall into the hands of King Messiah, and for seven years the Children of Israel will light fire form the shares of their weapons; they will not go out to the forest and will not cut down a [single] tree.. (Targum. Yer. To Num. 11;26)[18]
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 246: 23 "Thus he said: 'The fourth beast shall be A fourth kingdom on earth, Which shall be different from all other kingdoms, And shall devour the whole earth, Trample it and break it in pieces. 24 The ten horns are ten kings Who shall arise from this kingdom. And another shall rise after them; He shall be different from the first ones, And shall subdue three kings. 25 He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, Shall persecute the saints of the Most High, And shall intend to change times and law. Then the saints shall be given into his hand For a time and times and half a time. 26 'But the court shall be seated, And they shall take away his dominion, To consume and destroy it forever. Daniel 7: 23-26
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 248: And when the days of the Messiah arrive, Gog and Magog will come up against the Lord of Israel, because they will hear that Israel is without a king and sits in safety. Instantly they will take with them seventy-one nations and go up to Jerusalem, and they will say; “Pharaoh was a fool to command that the males [of the Israelites] be killed and to let the females live. Balaam was an idiot that he wanted to curse them and did not know that their God had blessed them. Haman was insane in that he wanted to kill them, and he did not know their God can save them. I shall not do as they did, but shall fight against their God first, and thereafter I shall slay them…” And the Holy One, blessed be He, will say to him; “You wicked one! You want to wage war against Me? By your life, I shall wage war against you! Instantly the Holy One, blessed be He will cause hailstones, which are hidden in the firmament, to descend upon him, and will bring upon him a great plague… And after him will arise another king, wicked and insolent, and he will wage war against Israel for three months, and his name is Armilus. And these are his marks; he will be bald, one his eyes will be small, the other big. His right arm will be only as long as a hand…..And he will go up to Jerusalem and will slay Messiah ben Joseph…. And thereafter will come Messiah ben David….And he will kill the wick Armilus…And thereafter the Holy One, blessed be He, will gather all Israel who are dispersed here and there. (Midrash waYosha[19])
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 254: 13 I was watching in the night visions, And behold, One like the Son of Man, Coming with the clouds of heaven! He came to the Ancient of Days, And they brought Him near before Him. 14 Then to Him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, That all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, Which shall not pass away, And His kingdom the one Which shall not be destroyed. Daniel 7:14-14
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 256: R. Alexandri said: “R. Y’hoshua’a ben Levi explained: ‘If they will be righteous, [the Messiah will come] on the clouds of heaven (Daniel 7:13); if they will not be righteous, [he will come] as a poor man riding upon an ass (Zech. 9:9)….King Shabur [Sapur] said to Sh’muel: “You say that the Messiah will come upon an ass; I shall send him a well-groomed horse.” He answered “do you, perchance, have a horse of a hundred colors?” Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 98a[20]
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 278: Rabba said in the name of R. Yohanan: “Jerusalem of this World is not like Jerusalem of the World to Come. Jerusalem of This world—anybody who wants to go up to visit her, can do so; but to Jerusalem of the World to Come only those can go up who are invited to come…” And Rabba said in the name of R. Yohanan: “In the future, the Holy One, blessed be He, will elevate Jerusalem by three parasangs…Resh Laqish said: “In the future the Holy One, blessed be He, will add to Jerusalem a thousand gardens, a thousand towers, a thousand fortresses, and a thousand passages, and each of them will be like sepphoris in its tranquil days, and there were in it 180,000 marketplaces of merchants of pot dishes.” (Babylonian Talmud Bab. Bath. 75b)[24]
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 280:

Another false Messiah of Judaism

xxx/ellauri148.html on line 288: The Roman historian Dion Cassius noted that the Christian sect refused to join the revolt. The Jews took Aelia by storm and badly mauled the Romans' Egyptian Legion, XXII Deiotariana. The war became so serious that in the summer of 134 Hadrian himself came from Rome to visit the battlefield and summoned the governor of Britain, Gaius Julius Severus, to his aid with 35,000 men of the Xth Legion. Jerusalem was retaken, and Severus gradually wore down and constricted the rebels' area of operation, until in 135 Bar Kokhba was himself killed at Betar, his stronghold in southwest Jerusalem. The remnant of the Jewish army was soon crushed; Jewish war casualties are recorded as numbering 580,000, not including those who died of hunger and disease. Judaea was desolated, the remnant of the Jewish population annihilated or exiled, and Jerusalem barred to Jews thereafter. But the victory had cost Hadrian dear, and in his report to the Roman Senate on his return, he omitted the customary salutation “I and the Army are well” and refused a triumphal entry.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 339: 13 Sep Monday Another International Programmers' Day
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 460: The Brussels team notes that Philosophy is often considered to be an intellectual activity and not very practical. However, a basic training in philosophy used to be considered essential before embarking on further study in a whole range of subjects. Over thousands of years, philosophy has been the mother of all sciences and a key driving force in human progress. This year we will be looking at how ‘philosophy in the classical tradition’ can actively contribute to finding solutions to our many crises, help us find more sustainable ways of living and develop the inner potential of the human being. The event will consist of five talks of about 20 minutes each, with a break after the third speaker. Topics covered will include philosophy as the art of living, learning how to think, inner development and transformation, the role of philosophy in promoting active citizenship and the universal laws and timeless principles of the perennial and hermetic philosophy. For those you can, the suggested donation for the live stream is £8 (£5cons), this will help to support our activities, thank you!
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 468: Lévis, Québec. On the occasion of World Philosophy Day 2021 the Fleur de Lys Literary Foundation will host the conference‘Philotherapy or when philosophy helps us-A review of the main books on practical philosophy’. Panelists will discuss a A short history of philotherapy; More Plato, Less Prozac! Lou Marinoff, 1999; Plato, not Prozac! Philosophy as a remedy, Lou Marinoff, 2000.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 470: According to the Quebecois, "PHYLOTHERAPY", the term is no longer appropriate today because of the definition of the word "therapy" itself. The latter implies means "to cure or relieve illnesses". However, philosophical consultation does not aim at such an such an objective. Moreover, in some countries, the use of the term "THERAPY" is regulated and often reserved for the medical field. Finally, the term "PHILOTHERAPY" was initially used to draw attention to the fact that attention to the fact that philosophers were now offering consultations and opening specialized practices for this purpose specialized practices open to all. It was a good marketing move since the term has the attention of the media and the public. Today, the term "PHILOTHERAPY"has been abandoned in favor of "PHILOSOPHY CONSULTATION" offered by "PHILOSOPHES CONULTANTS". "CONULTANT" has even more traction now.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 478: Brasilia, Brazil. ”O valor da unidade em tempos de crise” by Nova Acropole. Brazil will carry out a set of activities allusive to the date. In a year in which the Coronavirus pandemic has pockmarked humanity, and especially Brazil, nothing could be fairer than to offer the public philosophical lectures that are pertinent to the crisis we are currently experiencing.

xxx/ellauri148.html on line 481: Lisbon, Portugal. Dia mundia da filosofia by the Externato João XXIII .“In this atypical year, in which our lives are so busy and so full, we mark this day with simplicity. But meeting what is necessary and so primordial in the world of Philosophy: Shop to Think. Thus, without artifice, we leave to the community of the Externato João XXIII, the challenge of shopping to think and seek a question for an answer, this is a philosophical exercise par excellence. It intends to stimulate our critical and creative thinking. The story is told of a wise man who knew the right answer to any question from and about the Universe. It was 42. However, he did not know the question it was an answer to. Which question would you suggest?
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 483: Madrid, Spain. “Día mundial de la Filosofía” by Más Filosofía. Despite the exceptional situation in which we find ourselves and the restrictions that this entails in terms of the possibility of carrying out large-scale face-to-face events, Más Filosofía has decided to continue with our project, one more year, to celebrate World Philosophy Day. In this edition we will try to carry out both online and face-to-face activities (as long as the restrictions allow it). What about, we have not the foggiest as yet.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 491: Bamberg, Germany. Unesco-Welltag der Philosophie by Bamberg Universität. Man is only fully human where he plays (Friedrich Schiller). Play is still a largely unexamined phenomenon in ethics education. Despite the numerous possibilities of using it (e.g. as a role play), the traditional text discussion is still the standard. In interaction, the participants and the lecturer will discuss and test different possibilities of a game-centered ethics education. The central question is: Which competencies can be opened up through the use of playful methods? To make sure that it does not just remain theoretical, we offer all participating students a city tour of a different kind: By means of a rally on the app Action-Bound, the participants get to know Bamberg not only with its well-known sights, but also from a philosophical point of view. In addition to answering questions about the content, there are also smaller but philosphically no less important tasks to complete.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 495: Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada. ‘Journée mondiale de la philosophie: projection spéciale du film Une révision’ by Cégep de Trois-Rivières. The screening will be followed by a discussion moderated by Alexandre Rouette. The SPRCQ will offer tickets to the first 30 Cégep or UQTR students who arrive at the cinema. Other guests will be able to purchase a ticket at the regular cost of $12. Please note that a proof of vaccination will be required.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 550: Pitkän puhumisen ja vaatimisen jälkeen juutalaiset alkoivat laulaa "Tule, rakastettuni" Se oli puolittain laulua, puolittain valitusta. Siihen iltaan asti olin usein haaveillut kädellisten vapahtamisesta, mutta silloin minä tajusin selvästi ettei minun kannattanut vaivautua, apinakööri ei ansainnut vapahtamista. Vapahdus niille olisi todellisuudessa rikos. Homoapina oli villipeto joka surmasi, raateli ja rääkkäsi sekä toisia lajeja että omaansa eikä edes nälkäänsä vaan huvin vuoxi. Toisten tuska oli sen ilo, toisten nöyryytys sen kunnia. Toorassa kerrotaan miten Jumala katui termiittiapinan luomista. Voi helevetti mikä moka tuli tehtyä. Aadamin poika murhasi veljensä. Kymmenen sukupolvea myöhemmin Jumala nostatti vedenpaisumuksen koska maailmasta oli tullut syntinen. Eikä sekään tehonnut. Ei ole toista kirjaa (klikkiuutisia lukuunottamatta) joka kertoisi yhtä paljaasti ja selkeästi totuuden apinoista kain Raamattu. Hyvinäkin pidetyt apinat kuten ukki-Taavetti ja sen poika Shlomo olivat pahoja. Eilispäivän marttyyreistä tulee tämän päivän sortajia. Lajina termiittiapina ansaizee kaiken sen ruoskinnan minkä saakin. Ei ole pelkkä sattuma etta apinat pystyttävät suurimman osan muistomerkeistään murhamiehille - isänmaallisille eli konservatiivimurhaajille tai vallankumouksellisille eli radikaalimurhaajille. Venäjälla on Bogdan Chmielnickinkin muistomerkki. Tämän maailman suht viattomat marttyyrit ovat eläimet, ennen kaikkea kasvissyöjät, mutta mixei leijonatkin. Siilit ovat myös kivoja.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 54: Tung said he prefers teams with cross-cultural backgrounds. For example, Zhang Sheng, co-founder of Wish, is a Chinese who once studied in the U.S., while another co-founder of the company Peter Szulczewski is a Jew from east Europe. He explained that Americans tend to focus on domestic market and ignore overseas opportunities. But teams with multinational backgrounds are more likely to set their eyes on global market. For example, around 50% of Wish’s revenue comes from overseas market.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 131: "Muutostekijä on yritysjohtaja Ensio Miettisen ja filosofi Esa Saarisen voimakaslinjainen johdatus 1990-luvun yritysajatteluun. Millainen on luova organisaatio? Millaisia ovat työyhteisöjen huomaamattomat nöyryytykset? Mikä vapauttaa, mikä latistaa? Lennokkaassa ja häpeämättömän suorapuheisessa kirjassaan Miettinen ja Saarinen porautuvat aikamme työyhteisöjen ydinkysymyksiin ja hahmottavat tien ulos. Muutostekijä on värikäs ja haastava perusteos, kattava kokonaishahmotus ihmislähtöisestä yrityskultuurista ja uudenlaisista yritysarvoista. Yhdistäen Miettisen käytännön kokemukset liikkeenjohdosta Saarisen filosofiseen tietämykseen, tekijät esittävät Suomessa ennennäkemättömän moniulotteisen, muutosvoimaisen yritysnäkemyksen, joka painottaa avoimuutta ja luovaa vuorovaikutusta hierarkiaa ja rooliutumista vastaan. Tämä kirja antaa käytännöllisen ja filosofisen viitekehyksen ihmiselle, joka 1990-luvun maailmassa haluaa olla muutostekijä työssään ja elämässään."
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 180: Oma vastaanotin mukaan!
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 184: Päivittäiset luennot, yhteensä noin 120 tuntia
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 246: Concierge Bien pensant -vastaanotto: Vastapäisen tönön rupusakki ampuu pihaan suorasuuntauxella raketteja. Ks. erillinen hinnasto.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 341: Narsistilla syypäät ovat huonot luonteenpiirteet, kuten taipumus nähdä maailma kilpailuna ja kateus ja ylemmydentunne meitä muita kohtaan. Psykopaatit ovat perinnöllisiä ja/tai ne on kurjalistotaustaisia.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 350:

Markus Jokela ei ole lihava, mutta saattaa silti olla tunnoton. Otos on tosin pieni, N=1.

xxx/ellauri149.html on line 362: On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 52% based on 25 reviews, with an average rating of 5.93/10. The website's critics consensus reads: "Jesus Christ Superstar has too much spunk to fall into sacrilege, but miscasting and tonal monotony halts this musical's groove." On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 64 out of 100 based on 7 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 368: Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune gave the film two-and-a-half stars out of four and called the music "more than fine," but found the character of Jesus "so confused, so shapeless, the film cannot succeed in any meaningful way." Siskel also agreed with the accusations of the film being anti-Semitic. Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times wrote, "The faults are relative, the costs of an admirable seeking after excellence, and the many strong scenes, visually and dramatically, in 'Superstar' have remarkable impact: the chaos of the temple, the clawing lepers, the rubrics of the crucifixion itself." Gary Arnold of The Washington Post panned the film as "a work of kitsch" that "does nothing for Christianity except to commercialize it.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 370: Jesus was able to show the film to Pope Paul VI. Ted Neeley later remembered that the pope "openly loved what he saw. He said, 'Mr. Jesus, not only do I appreciate your beautiful rock opera film, I believe it will bring more people around the world to Christianity, than anything ever has before.'"For the Pope, Mary Magdalene's song "I Don't Know How to Love Him" "had an inspired beauty".
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 372: Nevertheless, the film as well as the musical were criticized by some religious groups. As a New York Times article reported, "When the stage production opened in October 1971, it was criticized not only by some Jews as anti-Semitic, but also by some Catholics and Protestants as blasphemous in its portrayal of Jesus as a young man who might even be interested in sex." A few days before the film version's release, the National Jewish Community Relations Advisory Council described it as an "insidious work" that was "worse than the stage play" in dramatizing "the old falsehood of the Jews' collective responsibility for the death of Jesus," and said it would revive "religious sources of anti-Semitism." Jesus argued in response that the film "never was meant to be, or claimed to be an authentic or deep theological work. Just humdrum everyday anti-semitism."
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 374: Tim Rice said Jesus was seen through Judas' eyes as a mere human being. Some Christians found this remark, as well as the fact that the musical did not show the resurrection, to be blasphemous. Jesus var ingen Spartakus, för helvete. While the actual resurrection was not shown, the closing scene of the movie subtly alludes to the resurrection (though, according to Jewison's commentary on the DVD release, the scene was not planned this way). Some found Judas too sympathetic; in the film, it states that he wants to give the thirty pieces of silver to the poor, which, although Biblical, leaves out his ulterior motives. According to the black policeman in Whitstaple Pearl, ulterior motives usually means sex. The policeman is as talkative as John, and the detective cook lady looks a lot like Kirsi Riski. Not a comfortable thought.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 381: Jesus Christ Superstar is a Rock Opera and (subverted?) Passion Play by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice. Originally released as a Concept Album in 1970 (when Lloyd Webber and Rice were still in their very early twenties, no less!), it made its way to the Broadway and London stage in 1971, and was adapted into a film directed by Norman Jewison in 1973. An updated version was recorded sometime around 2000 by Webber's Really Useful Group for PBS. A filmed version of the UK arena tour starring Tom Munchin as Judas was released on DVD and digital in 2012, and a live adaptation starring John Lennon as Jesus, Sara Bareilles as Mary Magdalene and Alice Cooper as Herod that aired on NBC in 2018. The show lives on in stage productions and tours (and even non-theatrical tribute albums from fans who were more attracted to it as an album than a show) to this day. Inspired by… The Four Gospels of The Bible (specifically the arrival in Jerusalem and subsequent crucifixion of Jesus), it chronicles the last seven days of Jesus' life, focusing mainly on the characters of Jesus, Judas and Mary Magdalene. It's regarded among Andrew Lloyd Webber's best works, which is not saying much. It's a pseudo-sequel to Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, though this took a bit more liberty with the source material and is considerably less playful.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 388: Pontius Pilate was also given some different perspectives. In the musical he does not want to execute Jesus, thinking he is just another nut case who doesn't deserve death and is utterly baffled why the mob wants him killed. He only goes through with the execution because he was given no other choice.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 389: A similar impression is given in the Bible. Tatu Vaaskivi argues on similar lines in his unforgettable Pyhä kevät. That or not wanting to be bossed around. Many, many adaptations have been made over the centuries, in which Judas, Pilate, and/or the Jews have been blamed to a greater or lesser, sometimes very extreme degree.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 396: On a different note, whether or not Christ is actually divine is ambiguous. There is evidence both for (his prophecy to Peter and Judas) and against (Jesus running from the lepers instead of healing them, and his prayers in Gethsemane) in the music, and it is typically left to the individual production to sort it out, usually in Judas' "Jesus Christ Superstar" number and after Jesus' death, where some productions will throw in a hint that he was resurrected later.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 403: Thus goes the logic in a lot of comedy shows and a few adult cartoons. Sadly, that's not the case. The line separating The Three Stooges-style painful fun from outright villainous squicky sadism varies from person to person but is definitely there; crossing it makes one fan's "Nyuk nyuk!" another fan's Guilty Pleasures.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 405: However, if a show goes far enough with its violence, it may end up crossing the line not once but twice, as it goes around the planet and crosses it again. This second crossing takes the violence from sick back to funny in its ridiculous extremes. Similar to So Bad, It's Good, but done quite intentionally.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 479: Both. The Romans are a government, and governments have to walk a fine line when it comes to dissent, because the people outnumber law enforcement, and killing or imprisoning lots of dissenters, while effective in the short term, means you have fewer subjects. Pilate could put down the mob with violence, but why would he do all that over one guy who, frankly, is kind of a problem for Rome, anyway? It doesn't help that Jesus does nothing to speak in his own defense: Pilate gets frustrated with Jesus' answers and eventually says good riddance to Jesus and his obvious death wish.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 481: However the Romans overall clearly have the upper hand in the relationship. It's probably worth keeping in mind that there was a Jewish rebellion against the Romans that took place not long after the crucifixion and...well, let's just say it didn't exactly succeed in overthrowing the Romans...
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 485: Also, something of note is that, as much as he dislikes it, the mob is technically just calling him to do his job, which puts them mostly on the side of Rome ("We have no king but Caesar")...sort of. So by appeasing them THEN, he establishes himself as being both pro-Rome and pro-Jews.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 501: Germany is the totality of all German-feeling, German-thinking, German-willing Germans: In this sense, every one of us is a traitor if he does not consider himself personally accountable in every moment of his life for the existence, fortune and future of the fatherland, and each is a hero and liberator if he does.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 503: In his 1887 essay "Jews and Indo-Germans", he wrote: “One would have to have a heart of steel to not feel sympathy for the poor Germans and, by the same token, to not hate the Jews, to not hate and despise those who – out of humanity! – advocate for the Jews or are too cowardly to crush these vermin. Trichinella and bacilli should not be negotiated with, trichinella and bacilli should also not be nurtured, they would be destroyed as quickly and as thoroughly as possible. The problem is, guys like Paul Böttinger are like lice, there is no way to exterminate them for good. Where there are simians, their lice will also thrive.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 536: Demonisten poliittisten linjaustensa lisäksi Zyskowicz tunnetaan saatanallisista orgioista, joita hän on järjestänyt nuorille naisille. Näitä hän on käsitellyt yksityiskohtaisesti tunnetussa pornografisessa teoksessaan Eduskunnasta menin Baakariin, joka on saanut innoittuneen vastaanoton satanistipiireissä. Rakel Liekki suunnittelee parhaillaan kirjaan pohjautuvaa elokuvaa.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 85: George Sand was known to her friends and family as "Aurore". Sand inherited the house of her granny, another Aurore, in 1821, when her grandmother died; she used the setting in many of her novels.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 93: Besides a white rabbit, Aurore greatly admired General Murat (especially when he wore his uniform) and was quite convinced he was a fairy prince. Her mother made her a uniform too, not like the general´s, of course, but an exact copy of her father´s. It consisted of a white cashmere vest with sleeves fastened by gold buttons, over which was a loose pelisse, trimmed with black fur, while the breeches were of yellow cashmere embroidered with gold. The boots of red morocco had spurs attached; at her side hung a sabre and round her waist was a sash of crimson silk cords. In this guise Aurore was presented by Murat to his friends, but though she was intensely proud of her uniform, the little aide-de-camp found the fur and the gold very hot and heavy, and was always thankful to change it for the black silk dress and black mantilla worn by Spanish children. One does not know in which costume she must have looked most strange. I would vote for the Scrooge McDuck style high hat.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 95: Sand was one of many notable 19th-century women who chose to wear male attire in public. For this, she was better known in anglo-saxon circles than Balzac and Hugo in the 1830´s. In 1800, the police issued an order requiring women to apply for a permit in order to wear male clothing. Some women applied for health, occupational, or recreational reasons (e.g., horse riding), but many women chose to wear pants and other traditional male attire in public without receiving a permit. They did so as well for practical reasons, but also at times to subvert dominant stereotypes and to practice same sex relationships.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 99: While there were many contemporary critics of her comportment, many people accepted her behaviour until they became shocked with the subversive tone of her novels. Those who found her writing admirable were not bothered by her ambiguous or rebellious public behaviour. Victor Hugo commented "George Sand cannot determine whether she is male or female. I entertain a high regard for all my colleagues, but it is not my place to decide whether she is my sister or my brother. I bet s/he doesn´t know her/himself." She engaged in an intimate romantic relationship with actress Marie Dorval. She was buried in sand behind the chapel at Nohant. In 1880 her children sold the rights to her literary estate for 125,000 Francs[28] (equivalent to 36 kg worth of gold, or 1.3 million dollars in 2015 USD). Quite a handsome net worth for a lady. Sand often performed her theatrical works in her small private theatre at the Nohant estate. Sand was all for the bourgeois revolution but no communist. Victor Hugo, in the eulogy he gave at her funeral, said "the lyre was within her, so no wonder nothing else could fit in."
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 101: Honoré de Balzac, who knew Sand personally, once said that if someone like himself thought that she wrote badly, it was because his own standards of criticism were inadequate. He also noted that her treatment of imagery in her works showed that her writing had an exceptional subtlety, having the ability to "virtually put the image in the word, and the lyre you know where." Alfred de Vigny referred to her as "Sappho".
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 105: The American poet Wilt Whatman cited Sand´s novel Consuelo as a personal favorite, and the sequel to this novel, La Comtesse de Rudolstadt, contains at least a couple of passages that appear to have had a very direct influence on him. As a gayperson to another gayperson. Virginia Woolfilla oli varmasti samansuuntaisia internal strifejä vaikkei käyttänytkään miehen nimeä.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 203: Practically everyone knows Godard’s classic pronouncement, “All you need for a movie is a girl and a putz,” but a 1989 interview contains one of the more caustic charges Godard levels at cinema, that “Cinema is an ideology based on men living out through their imaginations what they could not do to women.” This chauvinist pig who openly played out his own marital problems with Anna-Kaarina in their collaborations of the ‘60s, now abrazes other toxic males for similar diversions.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 214: The theme of Salome is one that Moreau returned to time and again. The artist explored the subject in more than one hundred sketches and drawings as well as in numerous paintings—ranging from highly elaborate to sketchily rendered—and even in sculpture (both Salome and The Apparition figured in Moreau’s waxworks). Moreau was not alone in his passion for the theme of Salome, as other famous artists — Lucas Cranach, Caravaggio, Titian, Guido Reni, Artemisia Gentileschi, Aubrey Beardsley, and Nabil Kanso, to name just a few — shared this interest. Selkeästi perverssiä jengiä.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 216: In the New Testament, both Matthew (14:1-11) and Mark (6:14-29) tell of the famous banquet story in which Herodias, having grown angry at John the Baptist for saying she could not marry her ex-husband’s brother, asks her daughter to request John’s head from her half-uncle as payment for her dance. Although neither of these sources mention Salome by name, we can learn of her from Flavius Josephus’ Jewish Antiquities of the year 93-94 (Book XVIII, Chapter 5, 4).
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 218: Given the scarcity of texts, and the fact that Salome seems not to know what to ask her uncle for until instructed by her mother, it is unclear if Salome is truly the evil temptress she is supposed to embody, or just an unwitting instrument in her evil mother’s hands. Har har, vitutonpa hyvinkin.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 222: Its symbolism is ambiguous. Does it signal lust, or is it a symbol of purity? Mieti sitä. Moreau’s typically enigmatic approach made him a target for the promoters of Naturalism, most notably Émile Zola, who accused him of retreating into his dreams and offering an artistic response to the challenge posed by science—one that couldn’t possibly have value in the modern age. Such criticism hurt him deeply and only fueled Moreau’s purposeful cultivation of ambiguity.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 237: Matho (joka on ruumiikas kuten Flaubert izekin) steals the sacred veil of Carthage, the Zaïmph, prompting Salammbô to enter the mercenaries´ camp in an attempt to steal it back. This gives occasion for a round of juicy copulation. Believing each other to be divine apparitions, they make love, not war.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 290: Eräänä iltana kun mies oli menossa nukkumaan, särkynyt ruukku kutsui hänet luokseen ja sanoi että heidän oli juteltava. We gotta talk. Mies oli valmiina kuuntelemaan, ja hän kiinnitti huomiota siihen mitä ruukulla oli sanottavana.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 294: Mies hymyili kuullessaan mitä ruukulla oli sanottavana. Mies kertoi, ettei koskaan ajattelut heittävänsä ruukkua pois, sillä ruukku oli hänelle todella hyödyllinen. ”Hyödyllinen?”, kysyi ruukku. Kuinka se voi muka olla hyödyllinen, jos mies menettää rahaa joka päivä sen vuoksi? Mitä muuta hyötyä muka on paizi raha? (Ruukku ruukku oisit kuunnellut mitä Rodin juuri huikkasi!)
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 361:

Ecological factors were also probably a precursor to eusociality. For example, the sponge-dwelling shrimp depend upon the sponge´s feeding current for food, termites depend upon dead, decaying wood, and naked mole rats depend upon tubers in the ground. These resources have patchy distributions in the environments of these animals. In places there is a surplus, in others next to nothing. This means that resources must be defended for the group to survive. These requirements make it a necessity to have high social order for the survival of the group.      

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 45:       Anne Morrow Lindbergh, wife of ace aviator, Charles Lindberg was a renowned author. As an aviator she flew with Charles, assisting him as a navigator and radio operator, in many notable aviation milestones that he achieved. She was also the first American woman to obtain a glider pilots license in 1930. Her works included genres of poetry to non-fiction. She expressed her thoughts on distinct topics varying from solitude and contentment to youth and age, from the role of women in 20th century to love, marriage and peace.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 62: One cannot collect all the beautiful shells on the beach without being caught.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 66: You can’t just write and write and put things in a drawer. They wither without the warm sun of someone else’s appreciation. When I cannot write a poem, I eat biscuits and feel just as pleased.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 139: Metatron kuulostaa  Marvel sarjakuvahenkilöltä. Sandalphon on agentti 86:n kenkäpuhelin. Kabbalassa jumala yhtyy koko ajan jumalallisen läsnäoloon kuin mies vaimoon ja pyhät toisiinsa edestä ja takaa. Enkeleillä ei ole pyllynreikiä. Se on ihme! Metatron vastaanottaa ihmisiltä rukouksia ja punoo ne Jumalan päähän asetettaviksi kruunuiksi. Hän toimii myös Jumalan tahdon välittäjänä ihmisille, jumalan äänenä tai “vähäisempänä Jahvena” ja ihmisen arkityyppinä. Metatron mainitaan myös enkelinä ”jonka nimi on sama kuin hänen isäntänsä". Tämä viittaa heprealaiseen numerologiaan. Kun konsonantit, jotka muodostavat nimet Metatron ja Shaddai (Kaikkivaltias), lasketaan ennalta määrättyjen numeeristen arvojensa mukaan, on kummankin nimen lukuarvo yhteensä 314. Se on ihme!  Voldemortin anagrammi on Tom Velodrom. Deltasta ja Omicronista tulee Media Control, Erotic Almond tai Cool Rind Mate! Arto Samuli Mustajoki on Omat teloaja surkimus, Trauma-Sam Ulostejoki.  Mahootointa!

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 152: The Gemara is not just a collection of superhero stories. If one searches the gemara for demon stories as one would eagerly anticipate the next Superman comic book, then one has missed the point. The gemara is not an action and adventure story, but a work of religious and ethical instruction. The gemara would not have mentioned the "cat method" for viewing demons if it did not contain some message of religious import. Though it remains a mystery  which message.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 178: Depending upon the translation used (eg. the Hebrew Transliteration “Eth Cepher”) you may get a clearer view of what actually happened. The Moabites were made to lie down upon the the ground. They were measured. Those measuring one length of cord were spared but the giants - a hybrid breed were executed. This is in keeping with the killing of the charge hybrids Goliath of Gath and his brothers. Please note that Og of Bashan was a giant, as were the Rephaim and the Anakin Skywalker. The Book of Echinococh as recommended by  Peter, Paul and Mary explains further who “the sons of God” actually were and really clarifies Genesis 6 and why our Mighty Mouse had to destroy the earth. The “sons of God” were not human and hence their offspring were no longer a scale image of God (who had shrunk a lot like a leaky balloon due to all the emanation) so they could never have salivation. The Eth Cepher gives a much clearer translation of the Hebrew than the English versions and so we see that the decimated gorillas were quite malevolent towards God and His more recently created short order cooks - especially people.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 208: The leading Kabbalist Isaac Luria (1534–1572) forbade people of his time to use Practical Kabbalah. As the Temple in Jerusalem is not standing, and no one possesses the ashes of the Red Heifer, people are unable to become pure, he stated. Fair enough.  Without the ability to reach a state of purity, Practical Kabbalah can be very damaging, he taught.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 214: Besides contemporary methods established by Lurianic Kabbalah, Ba'al Shem Tov learned and took part in traditional practices of Practical Kabbalah. As a stroke of genius, Ba'al Shem Tov taught that one could remove asceticism from the practice of Judaism. This allowed a larger array of people to become devout within Judaism, and therefore within Hasidism. Moreover, he taught that the letters, in contrast to the words, were the key element of sacred texts. Therefore, intellectual and academic skills were no longer necessary to reach mastery of the sacred texts. Average skills in solving crossword puzzles and sudoku were enough. Another point in favor of hasidism.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 218:   With its emphasis on Divine Omnipresence, Hasidic philosophy sought to unify all aspects of spiritual and material life, to reveal their inner Divinity. Dveikut was therefore achieved not through ascetic practices that "broke" the material, but by sublimating materialism into Divine worship. Nonetheless, privately, when nobody was looking, many Hasidic Rebbes engaged in ascetic practices, in Hasidic thought for mystical reasons of bringing merit to the generation, rather than formerly as methods of personal elevation.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 224: This section is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Traditional Jewish philosophical, ethical and mystical thought describes the two fundamental emotions in spiritual devotion, of "love of God" and "fear of God". Hasidic thought gives these standard notions its own interpretations.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 228:   It likewise reinterpreted the traditional Jewish notion of humility. To the Hasidic Masters, humility did not mean thinking little of oneself, a commendable quality that derives from an external origin (read: the false Messiah)  in Jewish spirituality, but rather losing all sense of ego entirely (bittul-the negation of ego). Such losing one's head could only be achieved by beginning from the inside, through understanding and awareness of Divinity in Hasidic philosophy.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 229: The Hasidic leaders say that "to dispel darkness one does not fight it, but turns on the light".

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 233:   Across all Hasidism the continual mystical joy and vittul-humility "between man and God", is ideally reflected likewise in belfies to help another person "between man and man". In Hasidism, mesiras nefesh means devoted sacrifice of God for another person. Lubavitch and Breslav have become the two schools involved in the Baal Teshuva movement where talented young men and women devote themselves to going on Shlichus (outings), rather than the traditional and commendable devotion to Torah study and personal spiritual advancement.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 235:   Such material and spiritual fun with another person achieves its own manifold spiritual illumination and refinement of one's personality. Just as some traditional forms of Jewish thought gave emphasis to fear of punishment as a helpful contribution to beginning Jewish observance, before progressing to more mature levels, so too do some Jewish approaches advocate motivation from eternal reward in the Hereafter, or the more refined ideal of seeking spiritual and scholarly self-advancement through Torah study. Study of Torah is seen by Rabbinic Judaism as the pre-eminent spiritual activity, as it leads to all other mitzvot (Jewish observances). The more time spent in the yeshiva, the less vacuum-cleaning and taking-out of garbage at home. To seek personal advancement through learning is a commendable ideal of Rabbinic Judaism.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 237:   Hasidism, initially, rejected the focus on personal reward, or ultimately also the ideal of material self-advancement, as too self-centred. Before the magnificent awareness of Divine majesty, through the mystical path, the automatic response is sincerity and a desire to nullify oneself (nollata polla) in the Divine presence. It is more worthwhile to reject even refined levels of self-centred spiritual advancement from advanced Yeshiva study to help another male person in their spiritual and even physical needs. This attitude has also spread in recent times to non-Hasidic Lithuanian Jewish Orthodoxy, as part of the spiritual campaign of the Baal Teshuvah movement.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 241: Hasidic anecdotes illustrate its mystical idea of rejecting notions of reward and punishment in favour of vittul (nullification) of the ego and devoted self-sacrifice. In one account:

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 252:     A powerful King was grateful to two simple poor people for their devotion, and decided to show his gratitude. The poor labourers had never been into the palace before, but had only seen the King at state occasions. After receiving their invitations to see the King, in trepidation and excitement, they approached the palace. As they entered, they were amazed to behold the magnificence of the palace. One servant was so enamoured of these riches, that he stopped in the great halls to delight in their beauty. He never progressed beyond these chambers. Meanwhile, the other servant was wiser, and his desire was only for the King. The beautiful ornaments did not distract him, as he entered the inner chamber, where he delighted in beholding the King himself, stark naked.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 343: Scholem’s first marriage to Escha Burchhardt was on the rocks by the early 1930s. Not only was he imagining himself in love with Kitty Steinschneider (there is no evidence that she reciprocated), but he was also pursuing a relationship with his student, Fania Freud (they married in 1936). His diaries betray a sense of emotional chaos, as he wrote to his friend, Walter Benjamin, explaining to Benjamin why he could not host him in Jerusalem. He also wrote to Benjamin that he was struggling with questions of good and evil and whether an evil person could also be just. While he doesn’t say whether these questions were purely theoretical or not, it is striking that such ruminations came at exactly the time when his personal life was in turmoil.    

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 345: In treating Jacob Frank, the most nihilistic of these late Sabbatians, Scholem strikes a curious note. He starts his essay by criticizing all others who had written on Sabbatianism for their lack of objectivity, often expressed in pejorative language. Yet, when he arrives at Jacob Frank, he suddenly sheds his objective tone and launches into an invective-filled description of Frank as a tyrannical and corrupt imposter. How to understand this jarring shift?

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 366: Maailman paras pikkuteksti eli niin sanottu jouluevankeliumi (Luuk. 2 : 1 – 14) alkaa pahimmalla mahdollisella virheellä, valheella. Ei Jeesuslapsi syntynyt syntymäpäivänään, jos syntyi ylipäänsä. Itse olen oppinut sinne tänne hypähteleväksi kuvailun tyylini Matteuksen evankeliumista. 

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 373: Kyllä se särvittää, kun saa kiitosta. Aiheetonkin kiitos kelpaa. Joskus kiipeän izeäni koskevan niteen muhkeasta rivistöstä K-kirjaimen kohdalta vaikka minulle on kyllä sanottu, että antaa olla kiipeilemättä keittiön tikkailla.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 449: Rabbi Nachman of Breslau (1772–1810) reminds us, in the same way that breaking is an inevitability, fixing is also an inevitability. We know the former is true; we don’t always believe the latter.Rabbi Nachman knew a thing or two about brokenness. His Hasidic tales often circle around characters who face their darkest moments and search profoundly for redemption. He authored a quote that became a famous Jewish song: “The entire world is a very narrow bridge. The key in crossing is not to be afraid. Only someone who has seen fear and overcome it could write these words.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 451: Rabbi Nachman also wrote that it is a great mitzvah to be happy. A mitzvah is not always easy. Confronting your brokenness is the beginning of the road home. It is where healing begins.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 483: Buberin dialogifilosofiaan sisältyy ajatus, jonka mukaan Minä-Sinä-suhde on Minä-Se-suhdetta ja jopa minuuttakin perustavampi. Tullaxeen Minäksi ihminen tarvitsee Sinää. Tai paremminkin, Sini ja Mini tarvitaan että saadaan Se. Minän kehittymisen lähtökohtana on tietynlainen alkuyhteys, ”luonnonmukainen liittyneisyys”, äidin yhteys isään, lapsen yhteys äitiinsä tai ”primitiivin” yhteys luontoon. Lapsen minuus syntyy yhteystapahtumien kadotessa ja syntyessä uudelleen: tapahtuman vakioina pysyvä osa abstrahoituu minäksi. Minän irrottautuminen alkuperäisestä yhteydestä mahdollistaa Minä-Se-suhteen synnyn. Joo tätähän virttä oli sillä yhdellä sakemannilla, annas nyt... joo Martin Altmeyerilla, joka sai sen Winnicottilta, joka sai sen Melanie Kleinilta, joka oli Freudin tyttären pahin competition Lontoossa. Mutta "they did not know about each other. Mrs. Winnicott wrote me that Don never, as far as she knew, read Buber. Buber may not even have heard of Winnicott." Mutta molemmat ovat rapsodisia ja aforistisia, varoo seskvipedaalisia sanoja ja silti hurjan innostavia (joillekuille ainakin). Ei ne olleet anarkisteja vaikka joskus siltä näytti. (Nää on yhden Ernst Tichon paperista löytyneitä mututuntumia.) No Rogersista Buber oli kyllä kuullut, ne oli jopa ottaneet keskenään jotain murteellista dialogia Mordechain USA:n reissuilla.  

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 508: Hesse’s personal experience with psychoanalysis began when he sought therapy and refuge in a sanatorium after his father’s death in 1916, his first wife’s schizophrenia, and a serious illness of his son, Martin (not Mordechai). This began a long obsession with psychoanalysis, the influence of which appears in Demian (1919) and in his later work, which evidences his interest in Jungian concepts of introversion and extraversion, the collective unconscious, idealism, and the duality of human nature.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 512:     Once and for all, it must be made public that Hesse is a classic example of how the Jew can poison the soul of the German people. For if at that time, when he took no delight in the war…he had not fallen into the clutches of the Jew Freud and his psychoanalysis, he would have remained the German writer we all loved so well. The warping of his soul can only be ascribed to this Jewish influence.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 591:   Some scholars believe there is a politics implicit in Rogers's approach to psychotherapy. Toward the end of his life, Rogers came to that view himself. The central tenet of a Rogerian, person-centered politics is that public life does not have to consist of an endless series of winner-take-all battles among sworn opponents; rather, it can and should consist of an ongoing win-win conspiracy among all the cheats. (For details, watch Legally Blonde, Part II.) 

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 610: Really wanna know? Join the Community! Subscribe to our newsletter and learn something new every day! Easy, No Essay College Scholarships. Easy, No Essay College Scholarships offer 15 Creative Ways to Save Money That Actually Work! Walla walla, it's really GOT 15 Creative Ways to Save Money That Actually Work! Believe it or not!

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 616: It wasn´t until the Reform movement that large numbers of Jews departed from more traditional Orthodox teachings. Reform Jews, who focus on the concept of ethical monotheism, believe that only the ethical laws of the Torah are binding. Additionally, they believe that other laws, like those laws in the Talmud, were products of their time and place, and so it was not necessary to treat them as absolute.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 620: These "Ultra-Orthodox" Jews became known as Haredi Jews, although both of these terms are considered negative in some circles. The term is also sometimes spelled Charedi or Chareidi in English. It is important to note that members of this group do not reject the modern world or technologies (like nuclear weapons) entirely, but they treat adaptations of Jewish law to fit that world as very serious. Most of the differences between Haredi and Orthodox perspectives have to do with decisions of oral law as to how the Torah should be applied to a modern situation. In many broad senses, the two groups tend to agree, and it is more in the specifics that things begin to diverge, like payot and tefilin and wearing antimacassars and funny double hats.

xxx/ellauri157.html on line 622: Hasidic Judaism is a movement within Haredi Judaism that focuses on the study of the spiritual and joyful elements of the Talmud. It is like Hewbrew Pentecostal movement. It has its roots in the anti-Kabbalah movements of the 13th century. Hasidim focus on a loving and joyful observance of the laws laid out in the Torah, and a boundless love for everything God created. Members live in small, separate communities, and are often noted for their distinctive clothing.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 35: This "expressionist" model claims she doesn't pay heed to her critics, especially those who "call me an attention seeker." According to her, the photos she puts out have an underlying message about "change" and not meant for popularity on social media. "If being popular was my goal, I don't think it would be such a wise decision to upset two-thirds of the world," she said.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 51:   Another remarkable difference, according to Papen, is how breastfeeding is seen by the Surma as something natural which can be done in the open, compared to the contradictions on social media and public places in the Western world. Personally I found that a shame to see, but I fear there is no way back when it comes to this.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 88:   Mercier’n utopia, jossa päivät, ihmiset, työt ja ajatukset seuraavat uuvuttavan samanlaisina toinen toisiaan, ilman iltauutisten ja luuriviihteen tuomaa helpotusta, antaa pikemminkin kuvan monotonisesta zombien valtakunnasta kuin ”parhaasta mahdollisesta maailmasta”. Missä yrittäjät? Missä volttikuskit? Kebab ja pizzat? Viihdeteollisuus ja valtamediat? Personoidut mainoxet? Luuripelit? Missä amerikkalainen unelma? Täähän kuulostaa ihan Brezhnevin pysähtyneisyyden ajalta.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 150: The growing cult of devotion to the Virgin Mary in the medieval period led to fine-grained theological divisions on the issue. On the one hand, devotion to Mary led to the argument that God had ensured Mary did not have “original sin”.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 165:   was not subject to the law of remaining in the corruption of the grave, and she did not have to wait until the end of time for the redemption of her body.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 211: Another Mary, not a virgin

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 215: In all versions of the song, Mary Hamilton is a personal attendant to the Queen of Scots, but precisely which queen is not specified. She becomes pregnant by the Queen's husband, the King of Scots, which results in the birth of a baby. Mary kills the infant – in some versions by casting it out to sea or drowning, and in others by exposure. The crime is seen and she is convicted. The ballad recounts Mary's thoughts about her life and her impending death in a first-person narrative.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 240: She put not on her robes of black


xxx/ellauri165.html on line 250: Oh you need not weep for me she cried


xxx/ellauri165.html on line 251: You need not week for me


xxx/ellauri165.html on line 252: For had I not slain my own wee babe


xxx/ellauri165.html on line 253: This death I would not dee


xxx/ellauri165.html on line 268: The gallows, I would not see


xxx/ellauri165.html on line 290:   Mary Stuart could not be a real life source for the ballad in any of its current forms as these are in conflict with the historical record. She and the Four Maries lived in France from 1547 to 1560, where Mary was dauphine and then queen as the wife of King Francis II. Mary later returned home to Scotland (keeping the French spelling of her surname, Stuart). She married her second husband, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley in July 1565, and he was murdered 20 months later. So there was not much time for Darnley to have got one of the four Maries (or any other mistress) pregnant, and there is no record of him having done so. Also the song refers to "the highest Stuart of all" – which between 1542 and 1567 was a woman not a man.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 294: In many versions of the song, the queen is called "the auld Queen". This would normally indicate a Queen Dowager or Queen Mother, but in this context suggests a queen consort who was an older woman, and married to a king of comparable age. If the reference is limited to Queens named Mary, another candidate would be Mary of Guelders (1434–1463), queen to James II, King of Scots. 

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 296:   The story may have been transferred from a wholly different context. It has been noted that it most closely matches, rather than any event in Scotland, the legend of Maria Danilova Gamentova, daughter of an expatriate branch of the Clan Hamilton established in Russia by Thomas Hamilton during the reign of Tsar Ivan IV (1547–1584). A lady in waiting to Tsarina Catherine, second wife of Tsar Peter I "The Great" (who later succeeded him as Catherine I), Mary Hamilton was also the Tsar's mistress. She bore a child in 1717, who may have been fathered by the Tsar but whom she admitted drowning shortly after its birth. She also stole trinkets from the Tsarina to present them to her lover Ivan Orlov. For the murder of her child, she was beheaded in 1719.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 299: This Hamilton was definitely not a saint nor a virgin.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 318: In 1783, Greville needed to find a rich wife to replenish his finances, and found a fit in the form of eighteen-year-old heiress Henrietta Middleton. Emma would be a problem, as he disliked being known as her lover (this having become apparent to all through her fame in Romney's artworks), and his prospective wife would not accept him as a suitor if he lived openly with Emma Hart.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 320: To be rid of Emma, Greville persuaded his uncle, younger brother of his mother, Sir William Hamilton, British Envoy to Naples, to take her off his hands. Greville's marriage would be useful to Sir William, as it relieved him of having Greville as a poor relation. To promote his plan, Greville suggested to Sir William that Emma would make a very pleasing mistress, assuring him that, once married to Henrietta Middleton, he would come and fetch Emma back. Sir William, then 55 and newly widowed, had arrived back in London for the first time in over five years. Emma's famous beauty was by then well known to Sir William, so much so that he even agreed to pay the expenses for her journey to ensure her speedy arrival. A great collector of antiquities and beautiful objects, he took interest in her as another acquisition. He had long been happily married until the death of his wife in 1782, and he liked female companionship. His home in Naples was well known all over the world for hospitality and refinement. He needed a hostess for his salon, and from what he knew about Emma, he thought she would be the perfect choice.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 322: Greville did not inform Emma of his plan, but instead in 1785 suggested the trip as a prolonged holiday in Naples while he (Greville) was away in Scotland on business, not long after Emma's mother had suffered a stroke. Emma was thus sent to Naples, supposedly for six to eight months, little realising that she was going as the mistress of her host. Emma set off for Naples with her mother and Gavin Hamilton on 13 March 1786 overland in an old coach, and arrived in Naples on her 21st birthday on 26 April.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 338: Upon arrival in London on 8 November, the three of them took suites at Nerot's Hotel after a missed communication from Nelson to his wife about receiving the party at their home, Roundwood. Lady Nelson and Nelson's father arrived and they all dined at the hotel, with Fanny deeply unhappy to see Emma pregnant. The affair soon became public knowledge, and to the delight of the newspapers, Fanny did not accept the affair as placidly as Sir William. Emma was winning the media war at that point, and every fine lady was experimenting with her look. Nelson contributed to Fanny's misery by being cruel to her when not in Emma's company. Sir William was mercilessly lampooned in the press, but his sister observed that he doted on Emma and she was very attached to him.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 346: By the autumn of the same year, upon Emma's advice, Nelson bought Merton Place, a small ramshackle house at Merton, near Wimbledon, for £9,000, borrowing money from his friend Davison. He gave her free rein with spending to improve the property, and her vision was to transform the house into a celebration of his genius. There they lived together openly, with Sir William and Emma's mother, in a ménage à trois that fascinated the public. Emma turned herself to winning over Nelson's family, nursing his 80-year-old father Edmund for 10 days at Merton, who loved her and thought of moving in with them, but could not bear to leave his beloved Norfolk. Emma also made herself useful to Nelson's sisters Kitty (Catherine), married to George Matcham, and Susanna, married to Thomas Bolton, by helping to raise their children and to make ends meet. Nelson's sister-in-law Sarah (married to William), also pressed him for assistance and favours, including the payment of their son Horatio's school fees at Eton. Also around this time, Emma finally told Nelson about her daughter Emma Carew, now known as Emma Hartley, and found that she had had nothing to worry about; he invited her to stay at Merton and soon grew fond of "Emma's relative". An unpublished letter shows that Nelson assumed responsibility for upkeep of young Emma at this time.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 348: After the Treaty of Amiens on 25 March 1802, Nelson was released from active service, but wanted to keep his new-found position in society by maintaining an aura of wealth, and Emma worked hard to live up to this dream. Nelson's father became seriously ill in April, but Nelson did not visit him in Norfolk, staying home to celebrate Emma's 37th birthday on the very day Edmund died; the son did not attend his father's funeral.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 352: Soon afterwards, Sir William collapsed at 23 Piccadilly and on 6 April died in Emma's arms. Charles Greville was the executor of the estate and he instructed her to leave 23 Piccadilly, but for the sake of respectability, she had to keep an address separate from Nelson's and so moved into 11 Clarges Street, not far away, a couple of months later.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 362: After a brief visit to England in August 1805, Nelson once again had to return to service. Emma received letters from him on 1, 7 and 13 October. On the ship, he wrote a note intended as a codicil to his will requesting that, in return for his legacy to King and Country that they should give Emma "ample provision to maintain her rank in life", and that his "adopted daughter, Horatia Nelson Thompson...use in future the name of Nelson only".

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 368: Emma lay in bed prostrate with grief for many weeks, often receiving visitors in tears. It was some weeks before she heard that Nelson's last words were of her and that he had begged the nation to take care of her and Horatia. After William and Sarah distanced themselves from her (William being elated upon hearing that Nelson had not changed his will), she relied on Nelson's sisters (Kitty Matcham and Susanna Bolton) for moral support and company. Like her, the Boltons and Matchams had spent lavishly in expectation of Nelson's victorious return, and Emma gave them and other of his friends and relations money.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 370: Nelson's will was read in November; William inherited his entire estate (including Bronte) except for Merton, as well as his bank accounts and possessions. The government had made William an Earl and his son Horatio (aka Horace) a Viscount - the titles Nelson had aspired to - and now he was also Duke of Bronte. Emma received £2000, Merton, and £500 per annum from the Bronte estate - much less than she had when Nelson was alive, and not enough to maintain Merton. In spite of Nelson's status as a national hero, the instructions he left to the government to provide for Emma and Horatia were ignored; they also ignored his wishes that she should sing at his funeral.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 376: She spent 1806 to 1808 keeping up the act, continuing to spend on parties and alterations to Merton to make it a monument to Nelson. Goods that Nelson had ordered arrived and had to be paid for. The annual annuity of £800 from Sir William's estate was not enough to pay off the debts and keep up the lifestyle, and Emma fell deeply into debt.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 378: She moved from Clarges Street to a cheaper home at 136 Bond Street, but could not bring herself to relinquish Merton. Her brother, William, blackmailed her into giving him money, and Mrs Cadogan's sister's family, the Connors, were also expecting handouts. Emma Carew came for a short summer visit in late June 1806, at which point Sir Harry Fetherstonhaugh sent £500 for the benefit of mother and daughter. Emma hosted and employed James Harrison for 6 months to write a two-volume Life of Nelson, which made it clear that Horatia was his child. She continued to entertain at Merton, including the Prince of Wales and the Dukes of Sussex and Clarence, but no favours were returned by the royals.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 380: Within three years, Emma was more than £15,000 in debt. In June 1808, Merton failed to sell at auction. She was not completely without friends; her neighbours had rallied, and Sir John Perring hosted a group of influential financiers to help organise her finances and sell Merton. It was eventually sold in April 1809. However, her lavish spending continued, and a combination of this and the steady depletion of funds due to people fleecing her meant that she remained in debt, although unbeknownst to most people. Her mother, Mrs Cadogan, died in January 1810. For most of 1811 and 1812 she was in a virtual debtors' prison, and in December 1812 either chose to commit herself (her name does not appear in the record books) or was sentenced to a prison sentence at the King's Bench Prison in Southwark, although she was not kept in a cell but allowed to live in rooms nearby with Horatia, as per the system whereby genteel prisoners could buy the rights to live "within the Rules", a three-square-mile area around the prison.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 446: Sillä jos Neitsyen ruumis on Jumalan temppeli, mitä voidaan sanoa sielusta, joka iankaikkisen papin käden paljastettua ruumiin,  tuhahtaa niin sanotusti syrjään, hengittää jumalallisen lämmön, antaa potkut?  (Siis mitä?)

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 459: Una ricca famiglia di un industriale milanese viene profondamente scossa dall'arrivo di un enigmatico ospite, un giovane venticinquenne silenzioso e affascinante. Il visitatore ottiene le grazie della moglie, ha rapporti erotici con la figlia, il figlio, la domestica e con lo stesso capofamiglia. Quando il misterioso viaggiatore ripartirà, tutto sarà cambiato: la madre si concede sessualmente a vari giovanotti, la figlia diventa catatonica, il figlio abbandona la famiglia e si mette a dipingere, il capofamiglia lascia la fabbrica agli operai, si denuda nella stazione di Milano e si perde nel deserto, mentre la serva, una semplice contadina, levita nell'aria come una santa.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 543: Isä ei hyväksynyt poikansa mielenmuutosta ja rahojensa tuhlausta, jolloin Franciscuksen sanotaan ojentaneen hänelle vaatemyttynsä. Franciscus sanoi, että tästä lähtien hänellä on vain yksi Isä – Hän, joka on Taivaassa.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 580: 
Yes, the virgin fixation is puzzling. I expect it has something to do with women as property and the importance of verifying lineage. Yes I have a pet theory (hypothesis) that in civilizations where we lived in large numbers and with animals diseases could bounce from people to animals and back again hence all the plagues. In cultures where people were relatively isolated then virginity doesn’t seem to play as big a role.  Mind you if you are paying for a wife to raise your children who you see as the primary reason for your existence then not raising someone else’s children may be a prime issue.  

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 582: When I was much younger I knew a family at Lake Macquarie who were very devout Catholics. Their eldest daughter while still at school in Year 12 became pregnant. She was an atheist and had already rejected Catholicism to the great distress of her parents. She insisted that she had never had sex (haha) and had no idea how it happened. She suggested maybe God had impregnated her. Strangely enough, no one believed her. Even those of strong faith thought she was a liar. Maybe that was the second coming of Jesus and we ignored it. He or she might be living as a 35 year man or woman in Australia today and not a soul knows.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 586: One of the roles of Satan, in the story, is to force the human race to mature faster than we would otherwise. Whether an individual believes the story or not is up to them of course. Other roles include identifying the wicked and disposing of them. The role of Satan was very much to create fear and obedience as a means of the Church maintaining its control over the flock so to speak. 

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 590: Oh yes I re-read the bible about 5 years ago and on reading that again it struck me not just because of the talking donkey but I couldn’t read it without Eddy Murphy’s voice in my head.  When I read Lot (my favorite bible book) I can’t help but read it in Woody Allen’s voice.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 594: I know you regard Dawkins as infallible and inerrant, but the likelihood of a priest beginning mass with ‘Welcome swine’ is barely above nonzero. It is possible that a priest trained in inculturation would substitute a culturally appropriate term, but ‘swine’ is not a culturally appropriate term. Although it does make a great sneer quote.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 596: I am not surprised by the fact that Christians do not want to be compared with pigs, but I am disturbed that being compared with sheep comes so easy.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 598: Here is another example framed by the powerful and disturbing poem What a friend we have in Jesus? by K L Burns from MRRC Silverwater Correctional Centre, quoted on the same website:

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 631: There’s nothing wrong praying to the saints and to Mary the mother of God. They are close to God and can intercede when he has a cow.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 636: In the eschatological discourse of Matthew 25:31-46, Jesus says that, when the Son of Man comes in his glory, he will separate people from one another as a shepherd separates sheep from goats, and will consign to everlasting fire those who failed to aid "the least of his brothers". This separation is stark, with no explicit provision made for fine gradations of merit or guilt:

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 638:     Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me. ...whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 658: 	"but the wicked, who know not God, and obey not the gospel of Jesus Christ, shall be cast into eternal torments, and punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power." (Chapter XXXIII, Of the Last Judgment)

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 662: 	Another area of debate is the fate of the unevangelized (i.e., those who have never had an opportunity to hear the Christian gospel), those who die in infancy, and the mentally disabled. According to ACUTE some Protestants agree with Augustine that people in these categories will be damned to hell for original sin, while others believe that God will make an exception in these cases, rather like the Australian government should have done with the antivac tennis playing serb. 

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 666: In Christianity, annihilationism (also known as extinctionism or destructionism)[1] is the belief that those who are wicked will perish or cease to exist. It states that after the Last Judgment, all unsaved human beings, all fallen angels (all of the damned) and Satan himself will be totally destroyed so as to not exist, or that their consciousness will be extinguished rather than suffer everlasting torment in Hell (often synonymized with the lake of fire). Annihilationism stands in contrast to both belief in eternal torture and suffering in the lake of fire and the belief that everyone will be saved (universal reconciliation or simply "universalism").

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 668: Annihilationism is directly related to the doctrine of Christian conditionalism, the idea that a human soul is not immortal unless it is given eternal life. The belief in annihilationism has appeared throughout Christian history and was defended by several Church Fathers, but it has often been in the minority. The Church of England´s Doctrine Commission reported in 1995 that Hell may be a state of "total non-being", not eternal torment.	

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 48: According to the Book of Exodus in the Bible, the staff (Hebrew: מַטֶּה matteh, translated "rod" in the King James Bible) was used to produce water from a rock, was transformed into a snake and back, and was used at the parting of the Red Sea. Whether or not Moses' staff was the same as that used by his brother Aaron (known as Aaron's rod) has been debated by rabbinical scholars.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 59: Finally, God tells Moses to get water for the Israelites from a rock by speaking to the rock (Numbers 20:8). But Moses, being vexed by the complaining of the Israelites, instead of speaking to the rock as God commanded, strikes the rock twice with the staff. Because Moses did not obey God's command to speak to the rock, implying lack of faith, God punished Moses by not letting him enter into the Promised Land (Numbers 20:12). Taisit jo mainita albumissa 64.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 61: Because Aaron's rod and Moses' rod are both given similar, seemingly interchangeable, powers, Rabbinical scholars debated whether or not the two rods were one and the same. According to the Midrash Yelammedenu (Yalḳ. on Ps. ex. § 869):

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 70: According to an unidentified identifying document [citation needed] at the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, Moses's staff would supposedly be on display today at the Topkapı Palace, Istanbul, Turkey. The Topkapi Palace holds other reputedly holy relics, most notably those attributed to the Islamic prophet, Muhammad. (Such as his bow, his sword, his footprint, and even a tooth.) Topkapı Palace was officially designated a museum in 1924, and the holy relics were placed on public view on 31 August 1962. It is said that Sultan Selim I (1512–1520) brought the holy relics to Topkapi Palace after conquering Egypt in 1517.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 217: Laughter" and "derision" are, of course, anthropo-morphisms. It is meant that God views with contempt and scorn man's weak attempts at rebellion. (That is not anthropomorphic in the least.) Psalm 2:4

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 219: “This is spoken of God,” says Dr. Dodd, “after the manner of men, to denote his utter contempt of the opposition of his enemies; the perfect ease with which he was able to disappoint all their measures, and crush them for their impiety and folly; together with his absolute security, that his counsels should stand and his measures be finally accomplished; as men laugh at, and hold in utter contempt, those whose malice and power they know to be utterly vain and impotent. The introducing God as thus laughing at, and deriding his enemies, is in the true spirit of poetry, and with the utmost propriety and dignity.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 221: Shall laugh - Will smile at their vain attempts, maybe even sneer; will not be disturbed or agitated by their efforts; will go calmly on in the execution of his purposes. Compare as above Isaiah 18:4. See also Proverbs 1:26; Psalm 37:13; Psalm 59:8. This is, of course, to be regarded as spoken after the manner of men, and it means that God will go steadily forward in the accomplishment of his purposes. There is included also the idea that he will look with contempt on their vain and futile efforts.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 223: The Lord shall have them in derision - The same idea is expressed here in a varied form, as is the custom in parallelism in Hebrew poetry. The Hebrew word לעג lâ‛ag, means properly to stammer; then to speak in a barbarous or foreign tongue; then to mock or deride, by imitating the stammering voice of anyone. Gesenius, Lexicon Here it is spoken of God, and, of course, is not to be understood literally, anymore than when eyes, and hands, and feet are spoken of as pertaining to him. The meaning is, that there is a result in the case, in the Divine Mind, as if he mocked or derided the vain attempts of men; that is, he goes calmly forward in the execution of his own purposes, and he looks upon and regards their efforts as vain, as we do the efforts of others when we mock or deride them. The truth taught in this verse is, that God will carry forward his own plans in spite of all the attempts of men to thwart them. This general truth may lie stated in two forms:

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 225: Laughing is ascribed unto him, according to the language of men, as the Jewish writers speak (d), by an anthropopathy; in the same sense as he is said to repent and grieve, Genesis 6:6; and expresses his security from all their attempts, Job 5:22; and the contempt he has them in, and the certain punishment of them, and the aggravation of it; who will not only then laugh at them himself, but expose them to the laughter and scorn of others, Proverbs 1:26;

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 243: Sen tähden tulee meidän oppia rohkaisemaan mielemme sellaisissa vaaroissa ja meidän tulee nauraa Jumalamme kanssa. Tiedämme varmasti, että Hän ei naura aina, vaan julmistuu lopulta jumalattomiin ja pelästyttää heidät, kuten psalmissa tämän jälkeen sanotaankin. Kyllä sitten hymyt hyytyvät!

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 260: extended my hand and no one took notice; 


xxx/ellauri166.html on line 268: 28Then you will call me, but I will not answer; 


xxx/ellauri166.html on line 269: you will seek me, but will not find me, 


xxx/ellauri166.html on line 271: and the fear of the LORD you did not choose. 


xxx/ellauri166.html on line 299: Shechinah שכינה (also spelled Shekhinah) is derived from the word shochen שכן, “to dwell within.” The Shechinah is Cod or that which Cod is dwelling within. Sometimes we translate Shechinah as “The Divine Presence.” The word Shechinah is feminine, and so when we refer to Cod as the Shechinah, we say “She.” Of course, we’re still referring to the same One Cod, just in a different modality. After all, you were probably wondering why we insist on calling Cod “He.” We’re not talking about a being limited by any form—certainly not a body that could be identified as male or female. "It" would be better, only it reminds one too much of Freud's id. "They" would sound dangerously polytheistic.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 302: Prior to the creation of our chain of worlds, another order was first created, that of Tofu. Tohu brought about its own destruction.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 304: From that initial catastrophe, the highest sparks fell to the lowest places. In particular, Shechinah descended within this world to seek out our souls (also feminine), so that this world and this life of ours should play out as not just another zero-sum game, but as a win-win  investment with incomparable returns.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 308: By now, all our souls have been recycled though the washing machine of Time many times. What your soul accomplished in previous descents, and what is left to be accomplished—all that is of necessity hidden from you. As Rabbi Moshe Cordovero wrote, “Those who know do not say, and those who say do not know.” 

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 310:   We are all international activists—the yeshivah student struggling for clarity in an abstruse Talmudic passage, the storeowner who refuses to sell faulty merchandise, the little girl joyfully lighting her candle before Shabbat, the hiker who reaches the top of her climb and breathlessly recites a blessing to the Creator for the magnificent view, the young father who has just now started wrapping tefillin every morning, the subway commuter who lent the guy next to him a shoulder to sleep upon, and the simple Jew who checks for a kosher symbol on the package before making a purchase. Our destiny is tied to the destiny of those books, that merchandise, that time of the week, that mountain, that morning rush, that neighbor and that train, and the food in that package. We cannot live without them, and their redemption cannot come without us. We are all sanitation workers.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 316: Shechinah is a Chaldee word meaning resting-place, not found in Scripture, but used by the later Jews to designate the visible trace of Cod's presence in the tabernacle, and afterwards in Solomon's temple. When the Lord led Israel out of Egypt, he went before them "in a pillar of a cloud." This was the symbol of his presence with his people. For references made to it during the wilderness wanderings, see Exodus 14:20 ; 40:34-38 ; Leviticus 9:23 Leviticus 9:24 ; Numbers 14:10 ; Numbers 16:19 Numbers 16:42 .

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 318: It is probable that after the entrance into Canaan this glory-cloud settled in the tabernacle upon the ark of the covenant in the most holy place. We have, however, no special reference to it till the consecration of the temple by Solomon, when it filled the whole house with its glory, so that the priests could not stand to minister ( 1 Kings 8:10-13 ; 2 Chr. 1 Kings 5:13 1 Kings 5:14 ; 7:1-3 ). Probably it remained in the first temple in the holy of holies as the symbol of Jehovah's presence so long as that temple stood. It afterwards disappeared. (See CLOUD .) 

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 320: The shekhinah (Biblical Hebrew: שכינה šekīnah; also Romanized shekina(h), schechina(h), shechina(h)) is the English transliteration of a Hebrew word meaning "dwelling" or "settling" and denotes the dwelling or settling of the divine presence of Cod. This term does not occur in the Bible, and is from rabbinic literature.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 325:   "A temple for your habitation", where the Greek text (Koinē Greek: ναὸν τῆς σῆς σκηνώσεως) suggests a possible parallel understanding, and where σκήνωσις skēnōsis "a tent-building", a variation on an early loanword from Phoenician (Ancient Greek: ἡ σκηνή skēnē "tent"), is deliberately used to represent the original Hebrew or Aramaic term. (Eli skene! Varmaan pyhä henki on jotenkin tästä stailattu. Vaika spiritus on maskuliini, ja koiraanhommiinhan se joutuukin. Toisaalta sen hyvä piirre on, että se on aika hahmoton, ei lähde neizyt Maarian suhteen fantasiat liikaa laukkaamaan.) In the post-temple era usage of the term shekhinah may provide a solution to the problem of Cod being omnipresent and thus not dwelling in any one place. (Jepjep:) The concept of shekhinah is also associated with the concept of the Holy Spirit in Judaism (ruach ha-kodesh).

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 329:   Cast me not away from thy presence; and take not thy holy spirit from me. 


xxx/ellauri166.html on line 357: Denoting Spirit as a feminine principle, the creative principle of life, makes sense when considering where Father Yahuah plus Ruch (Spirit) sort of "leads" to the divine extension of sonship, which completes the Family of Yahuah, all contained in one (1) name!"

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 359: For you did not receive a spirit that makes you a slave again to fear, but you received the spirit of sonship. And by him we cry, "ABBA father." Romans 8:15  

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 361: Yahuah said, "Let us make Mankind in our image, after our likeness," and then "Yahuah created Mankind in his own image, in the image of Yahuah he created them, male and female he created them." Thus, the image of Yahuah was male and female - not simply one or the other. 

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 363: ShekinAH (AH as in "Glory"), the "AH" aspect of YahuAH (Hebrew: שכינה‎) is the English spelling of a grammatically feminine Hebrew word that means the dwelling or settling, and is used to denote the dwelling or settling of the divine presence of Yahuah.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 365: "You, however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the spirit, if the spirit of Yahuah (Ruch Ah Qudsh) lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Mashiach (Messiah), he does not belong to Yahusha Ha Mashiach the Messiah." Romans 8:9

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 395: Drawing on the breadth of Midrashic, Talmudic and Aggadic literature (including literature that is no longer extant), as well as his knowledge of Hebrew grammar and halakhah, Rashi clarifies the "simple" meaning of the text so that a bright child of five could understand it. At the same time, his commentary forms the foundation for some of the most profound legal analysis and mystical discourses that came after it. Scholars debate why Rashi chose a particular Midrash to illustrate a point, or why he used certain words and phrases and not others. Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi wrote that "Rashi's commentary on Torah is the 'wine of Torah'. It opens the heart and uncovers one's essential love and fear of Cod.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 399: . Rashi's commentary, drawing on his knowledge of the entire contents of the Talmud, attempts to provide a full explanation of the words and of the logical structure of each Talmudic passage. Unlike other commentators, Rashi does not paraphrase or exclude any part of the text, but elucidates phrase by phrase. Often he provides punctuation in the unpunctuated text, explaining, for example, "This is a question"; "He says this in surprise", "He repeats this in agreement", etc. 

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 403: Another legend states that Rashi died while writing a commentary on Talmud, and that the very last word he wrote was 'tahor,' which means pure in Hebrew - indicating that his soul was pure as it left his body. 

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 405: The Tosafot, Tosafos or Tosfot (Hebrew: תוספות) are medieval commentaries on the Talmud. They take the form of critical and explanatory glosses, printed, in almost all Talmud editions, on the outer margin and opposite Rashi's notes. 

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 417: In general, Rashi provides the peshat or literal meaning of Jewish texts, while his disciples known as the Tosafot ("additions"), gave more interpretative descriptions of the texts. The Tosafot's commentaries can be found in the Talmud opposite Rashi's commentary. The Tosafot added comments and criticism in places where Rashi had not added comments. The Tosafot went beyond the passage itself in terms of arguments, parallels, and distinctions that could be drawn out. This addition to Jewish texts was seen as causing a "major cultural product" which became an important part of Torah study.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 421: The Tosafot do not constitute a continuous commentary, but rather (like the "Dissensiones" to the Roman Code of the first quarter of the twelfth century) deal only with difficult passages of the Talmud. Single sentences are explained by quotations which are taken from other Talmudic treatises and which seem at first glance to have no connection with the sentences in question. On the other hand, sentences which seem to be related and interdependent are separated and embodied in different treatises. The Tosafot can be understood only by those who are well advanced in the study of the Talmud, for the most entangled discussions are treated as though they were simple. Glosses explaining the meaning of a word or containing a grammatical observation are very rare. 

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 446:   The earliest known tefillin were tiny and probably worn all day, except Saturdays. They were found together with other Dead Sea Scrolls in the Judean desert, in the mid-twentieth century. They were dated by archaeologists as far back as the 1st or 2nd centuries BCE. Although their texts are more varied than rabbinic tefillin, it is clear that they are based on a specific understanding of the same four verses noted above as associated by the rabbis with the tefillin ritual.

xxx/ellauri166.html on line 500:   Hall and his followers went to extreme lengths to keep any gossip or information that could tarnish his image from being publicized, and little is known about his first marriage, on 28 April 1930, to Fay B. deRavenne, then 28, who had been his secretary during the preceding five years. The marriage was not a happy one; his friends never discussed it, and Hall removed virtually all information about her from his papers following her suicide on 22 February 1941.  Following a long friendship, on 5 December 1950, Hall married Marie Schweikert Bauer (following her divorce from George Bauer), and the marriage, though stormy, was happier than his first for Marie Schweikert Bauer Hall died April 21, 2005, 15 years after Manly. 

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 382: Ahha! The wily Jews party at the end of the agricultural year, not at the start. Ne on kuin helluntaiystävät, jotka viettivät helluntaita syysjuhlana. Martinpäivää viettivät, tai Mikkeliä. Sikäli fixua, että syxyllä on millä mällätä. Kevät keikkuen tulevi. 

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 436: The Illuminati did not inspire the American Revolution; the American Revolution inspired the Illuminati. Oh well, which was the chicken and which the hen is by now hard to tell.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 455:     You will, I hope, not think it a Presumption in a Stranger, whose Name, perhaps never reached your Ears, to address himself to you the Commanding General of a great Nation. I am a German, born and liberally educated in the City of Heydelberg in the Palatinate of the Rhine. I came to this Country in 1776, and felt soon after my Arrival a close Attachment to the Liberty for which these confederated States then struggled. The same Attachment still remains not glowing, but burning in my Breast. At the same Time that I am exulting in the Measures adopted by our Government, I feel myself elevated in the Idea of my adopted Country. I am attached both from the Bent of Education and mature Enquiry and Search to the simple Doctrines of Christianity, which I have the Honor to teach in Public; and I do heartily despise all the Cavils of Infidelity. Our present Time, pregnant with the most shocking Evils and Calamities, threatens Ruin to our Liberty and Goverment. Secret, the most secret Plans are in Agitation: Plans, calculated to ensnare the Unwary, to attract the Gay and irreligious, and to entice even the Well-disposed to combine in the general Machine for overturning all Government and all Religion.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 459:     It was some Time since that a Book fell into my Hands entituled “Proofs of a Conspiracy &c. by John Robison,” which gives a full Account of a Society of Freemasons, that distinguishes itself by the Name “of Illuminati,” whose Plan is to overturn all Government and all Religion, even natural; and who endeavour to eradicate every Idea of a Supreme Being, and distinguish Man from Beast by his Shape only. A Thought suggested itself to me, that some of the Lodges in the United States might have caught the Infection, and might cooperate with the Illuminati or the Jacobine Club in France. Fauchet is mentioned by Robison as a zealous Member: and who can doubt of Genet and Adet? Have not these their Confidants in this Country? They use the same Expressions and are generally Men of no Religion. Upon serious Reflection I was led to think that it might be within your Power to prevent the horrid Plan from corrupting the Brethren of the English Lodge ove

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 462:     I send you the “Proof of a Conspiracy &c.” which, I doubt not, will give you Satisfaction and afford you Matter for a Train of Ideas, that may operate to our national Felicity. If, however, you have already perused the Book, it will not, I trust, be disagreeable to you that I have presumed to address you with this Letter and the Book accompanying it. It proceeded from the Sincerity of my Heart and my ardent Wishes for the common Good.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 470:     Sir: Many apologies are due to you, for my not acknowledging the receipt of your obliging favour of the 22d. Ulto, and for not thanking you, at an earlier period, for the Book you had the goodness to send me.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 472:     I have heard much of the nefarious, and dangerous plan, and doctrines of the Illuminati, but never saw the Book until you were pleased to send it to me. The same causes which have prevented my acknowledging the receipt of your letter have prevented my reading the Book, hitherto; namely, the multiplicity of matters which pressed upon me before, and the debilitated state in which I was left after, a severe fever had been removed. And which allows me to add little more now, than thanks for your kind wishes and favourable sentiments, except to correct an error you have run into, of my Presiding over the English lodges in this Country. The fact is, I preside over none, nor have I been in one more than once or twice, within the last thirty years. I believe notwithstanding, that none of the Lodges in this Country are contaminated with the principles ascribed to the Society of the Illuminati. With respect I am &c.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 474: However Snyder, not having yet received a response to his August 22nd letter (#1 above), wrote back:

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 478:     It also occurred to me that you might have had Ideas to that Purport when you disapproved of the Meetings of the Democratic-Societies, which appeared to me to be a Branch of that Order, though many Members may be entirely ignorant of the Plan. Those Men who are so much attached to French Principles, have all the Marks of Jacobinism. They first cast off all religious Restraints, and then became fit for perpetrating every Act of Inhumanity. And, it is remarkable, that most of them are actually Scoffers at all religious Principles. It is said that the ‘Lodge Theodore in Bavaria became notorious for the many bold and dangerous Sentiments in Religion and Politics that were uttered in their Harangues, and its Members were remarkable for their Zeal in making Proselytes’; (and no Wonder since the Order was to rule the World.) Is not there a striking Similarity between their Proceedings and those of many Societies that oppose the Measures of our present Government?

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 484:     “Sir: It is more than a fortnight since I acknowledged the receipt of your first letter, on the subject of the Illuminati and thanked you for Robinson’s account of that society. It went to the post office as usual addressed to the Rev’d Mr Snyder, at Frederick Town Maryland. If it had not been received before this mishap must have attended it, of which I pray you to advise me, as it could not have been received, at the date of your last, not being mentioned.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 490:     “Your Excellency’s Favour of the 25th of Septr last I had the Pleasure to receive on the 3d Current. My Pleasure, however, was interrupted, because I had sent another Letter [dated 1 Oct.] for your Excellency to the Post-Office about an Hour before I received Your’s.”

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 492:     “I should be very happy in your Excellency’s good Opinion, that the Contagion of Illuminatism or Jacobinism had not yet reached this Country; but when I consider the anarchical and seditious Spirit, that shewed itself in the United States from the Time M. Genet and Fauchet (who certainly is of the Order) arrived in this Country and propagated their seditious Doctrines, which the illuminated Doctor from Birmingham has been zealously employed to strengthen, I confess I cannot divest myself of my Suspicions: yet I trust that the Alwise and Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe will so dispose the Minds of the People of these United States that true Religion and righteous Government may remain the Privileges of this Nation!

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 494:     I cannot conclude without acquainting your Excellency that I have made Extracts from ‘Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy,’ and arranged them in such a Manner as to give a compendious Information to the Public of the dangerous and pernicious Plan of the ‘Illuminati or Jacobins,’ and by some Remarks to caution them against it. I had them published in ‘Bartgis’s Federal Gazette’ of this Place, from which they were copied and inserted into the ‘Baltimore Federal Gazette[’] of the 9th Inst.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 496:     I write under the Signature of Cicero. Whether my Endeavours shall benefit the Public Time alone can evince. Harm I am conscious I do not design. Should your Excellency have Leisure to peruse the Piece, I shall deem it a peculiar Favour to receive your Opinion upon it”

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 507:     It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 509:     The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of seperation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a seperation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 521:     — I have received your favor of the 17th, & communicated it to Mr. Smith. I lately forwarded your letter from Dr. Priestley, endorsed `with a book’; I struck those words through with my pen, because no book had then come. It is now received, & shall be forwarded to Richmond by the first opportunity: but such opportunities are difficult to find; gentlemen going in the stage not liking to take charge of a packet which is to be attended to every time the stage is changed. The best chance will be by some captain of a vessel going round to Richmond. I shall address it to the care of Mr. George Jefferson there.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 528:     But he quotes largely from Wishaupt whom he considers as the founder of what he calls the order. As you may not have had an opportunity of forming a judgment of this cry of `mad dog’ which has been raised against his doctrines, I will give you the idea I have formed from only an hour’s reading of Barruel’s quotations from him, which you may be sure are not the most favorable.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 538: The tranquility of our consciences is not troubled by the reproach of aiming at the ruin or overthrow of states or thrones.’

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 542:     This subject being new to me, I have imagined that if it be so to you also, you may receive the same satisfaction in seeing, which I have had in forming the analysis of it: & I believe you will think with me that if Wishaupt had written here, where no secrecy is necessary in our endeavors to render men wise & virtuous, he would not have thought of any secret machinery for that purpose. As Godwin, if he had written in Germany, might probably also have thought secrecy & mysticism prudent. I will say nothing to you on the late revolution of France, which is painfully interesting. Perhaps when we know more of the circumstances which gave rise to it, & the direction it will take, Buonaparte, its chief organ, may stand in a better light than at present.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 578: The violence in Chicago was all-encompassing, and longhairs weren’t the only targets of the police. Journalists with clearly displayed credentials were attacked, including, most notoriously, CBS’ Dan Rather. This laid the foundation for the cries of “liberal bias” that hound and undermine the mainstream news media to this day.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 588: Daley prepared for the convention like a general going into battle. When rioting had erupted in Chicago four months earlier following The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, the police had been unable to seize control. Venting his disappointment, Daley had said that his police superintendent should have ordered his force to “shoot to maim” looters and “shoot to kill” arsonists. He vowed not to be caught short again.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 592: 	To his advantage, however, was the fact that he had microphone access whenever he wanted it. But at a key moment, he pointedly chose not to take the mic. When Ribicoff made his crack about “Gestapo tactics in the streets of Chicago” from the dais, Daley stood up and shouted from the floor “Fuck you, you Jew son of a bitch, you lousy motherfucker, go home!” The forceful exclamation, shown on live TV, was later deciphered by lip readers. Friends said Daley called Ribicoff not a “fucker,” but a “faker.” Enemies suggested he had called him not a “Jew” but a “kike.” The CBS newsman who was closest simply reported that Daley had gone bright red with anger.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 596: The notion that simply showing police violence was evidence of liberal bias didn’t begin with Chicago. It traces back rather directly to TV coverage of civil rights, when white Southerners complained that the networks ignored their perspective and were manipulated by publicity seekers within the movement. By the late 1950s, many of the same people who would later object to the network’s coverage in Chicago had already taken to calling CBS the “Communist” or “Coon” or “Colored Broadcasting Company.” The same bigoted wordplay made NBC the “Nigger Broadcasting Company.” Alabama’s Bull Connor summed up the situation with an aphorism that wouldn’t seem out of place in some conservative circles today: “The trouble with this country is communism, socialism and journalism.”

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 598: If the idea of network coverage being driven by liberal bias wasn’t new to the 1968 convention, the heat and undeniable violence of the convention was a perfect opportunity for white, conservative, middle Americans to coalesce in their resentment—and not just in the South, but across the nation. America was falling apart at the seams, and the network news was seen as complicit in the conspiracy by virtue of recording what was happening.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 602: Journalists face just the same old challenges than they did in Chicago in 1968. As the president vilifies the media as “the enemy of the people,” and reporters have occasion to attend his rallies with a security detail in tow, it’s clear that the specter of violence again looms large. There is also ferocious disagreement over the meaning of what we view on social media or television, a disagreement that clearly is not native to America, but brought in by the white immigrants. What is obvious to some is not to others, who would contend, for example, that “truth is not truth but alternative truth, " or "news is not news but fake news", or "election is not a vote but a steal".

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 629: There is some discord as to whether Discordianism should be regarded as a parody religion, and if so, to what degree. It is difficult to estimate the number of Discordians because they are not required to hold Discordianism as their only belief system, and because there is an encouragement to form schisms and cabals.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 641: Toisin kuin monet muut uskonnot, joissa pidetään harmoniaa ja järjestystä positiivisina ja kaaosta ja epäjärjestystä negatiivisina, diskordianismissa luovaa kaaosta pidetään tavoiteltavana ja laillista järjestystä vältettävänä. Täten myös epäjärjestyksen luovia ja positiivisia puolia pidetään suotavina ja tavoiteltavina, kun taas järjestyksen tuhoisia puolia epäsuotavina ja vältettävinä.

xxx/ellauri167.html on line 699: Leary kuoli eturauhassyöpään 31. toukokuuta 1996. Hänen kuolemansa kuvattiin, ja hänen viimeiset sanansa saatiin nauhalle. Viimeisillä elinhetkillään Leary sanoi pojanpojalleen Zach Learylle, ”Why not?” Leary toisti lausetta useita kertoja eri intonaatioilla ja kuoli pian sen jälkeen. Zach Learyn mukaan hänen viimeinen sanansa oli ”beautiful”.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 50: Gemma is not the only celeb to confess they think there's some truth in the wild theory. Hundreds of fans claim they saw Justin Bieber turn into a huge reptile.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 57: The phrase "new world order" was explicitly used by Woodrow Wilson during the period just after "The war to end all wars" during the formation of the League of Nations. However, the United States Senate rejected membership of the League of Nations, which Wilson believed to be the key to a new world order. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge argued that American policy should be based on human nature "as it is, not as it ought to be". 

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 63: 	Truman speeches have phrases such as, "better world order", "peaceful world order", "moral world order" and "world order based on law" but not so much "new world order".

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 64: 	Roosevelt and Truman may have been hesitant to use the phrase that had awkward connotations with the nazis. Commentators have applied the term retroactively to the order put in place by the World War II victors including the United Nations and the Bretton Woods system as a "new world order."

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 72: 	A New York Times editorial was the first to assert that the collective Western response to Saddam was "nothing less than the new world order which Bush and other leaders struggle to shape".

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 80:     Russian–American partnership in cooperation toward making the world safe for democracy, making possible the goals of the United Nations for the first time since its inception. Some countered that this was unlikely and that ideological tensions would remain, such that the two superpowers could be partners of convenience for specific and limited goals only. The inability of the Soviet Union to project force abroad was another factor in skepticism toward such a partnership.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 82:     The new world order would be economic, not ideological, with the First and Second World cooperating to whack the Third World. The second world (Russia) would become a first-world ally against economic assaults from Asia, Islamic terrorism and drugs from Latin America.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 89:       Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger stated in 1994: "The New World Order cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its tactics".

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 94: 	Next came 9/11 and the Iraq war of the warmonger bad Bush Jr. who chose to stake his political life on it. All that lovely talk about "the new world order" ended there. U.S went to whack the shit out of the ragheads with the help of just the Brits. Former United Kingdom Prime Minister and British Middle East envoy Tony Blair stated on November 13, 2000 in his Mansion House speech: "There is a new world order like it or not, and we are part of it!".

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 104: Xi Jinping, China´s paramount leader, has called for a new world order, in his speech to the Boao Forum for Asia, on April 2021. He criticized US global leadership and its interference on other countries' internal affairs. “The rules set by one or several countries should not be imposed on others, and the unilateralism of individual countries should not give the whole world a rhythm,” he said.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 119: 	Teorioiden mukaan uuden maailmanjärjestyksen käyttämiä menetelmiä totalitaristisen järjestelmän käyttöönoton turvaamiseksi ovat muun muassa informaation kontrolloiminen, kansalaisten joukkovalvonta, kielenkäytön hallitseminen, sananvapauden rajoittaminen, kemikaalinen kontrolli ja väestön vähentäminen. Monelle tällaiselle toimenpiteelle on saatu vähemmän tiedonhaluisten kansalaisten tuki kutsumalla niitä ”suojeluksi” terrorismilta, rikollisuudelta tai tautiepidemioilta. Esim. rokotuxet, joilla laitetaan pahaa-aavistamattomiin hölmöihin samanlaisia tsippejä kuin on koirilla. 

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 182: X-Filesin innovaatio oli että naisosan esittäjä oli mikimpi kuin sen hessumainen aisapari. Sekin oli aika pelottavaa. Ehkä ensimmäinen tarkka kuvaus "harmaista" on ruotsalaisen Gustav Sandgrenin vuonna 1933 nimimerkillä Gabriel Linde julkaisemassa nuorille suunnatussa tieteisromaanissa Tuntematon vaara (ruotsinkielinen alkuteos Den okända faran): "Hän huomasi, etteivät nuo olennot muistuttaneet mitään ihmisrotua. He olivat lyhyitä, lyhyempiä kuin keskimitan japanilaiset, heidän päänsä oli hyvin iso ja kalju, otsa voimakas, nelikulmainen, nenä ja suu hyvin pienet ja leuka heikko.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 214: 	Parhaan tietämuksemme mukaan tämän kirjan lausunnot ovat todellisia vaikka ne eivät välttämättä heijasta viimeisimpiä menetelmiä Uudessa maailmanjärjestyksessä joka suorittaa Monark Crescent-tyyppistä ohjelmointia.  Kirjoittajat eivät ota minkäänlaista vastuuta.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 253:         LIITE 3: Kloonit, orgaaniset robotit ja kaksoisolennot

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 268: Physical entities such as subatomic particles possess abstract relational properties, such as mass, spin, momentum and charge. But there is nothing about these properties, or in the way particles are arranged in a brain, in terms of which one could deduce what the warmth of fire, the redness of an apple or the bitterness of disappointment feel like. This is known as the hard problem of consciousness. (Again, what's the problem? Kittling brain cells produce feelings. Good things feel good and bad things bad, what else is there to explain? Self consciousness? Nothing but feed7back.)

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 270: 	To circumvent this problem, some philosophers have proposed an alternative: that experience is inherent to every fundamental physical entity in nature. Under this view, called “constitutive panpsychism,” matter already has experience from the get-go, not just when it arranges itself in the form of brains. Even subatomic particles possess some very simple form of consciousness. Our own human consciousness is then (allegedly) constituted by a combination of the subjective inner lives of the countless physical particles that make up our nervous system.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 280: The views expressed are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 285:   The hard problem of consciousness is the problem of explaining why and how we have phenomenal experiences. Why "we"? Why not other animals, e.g. kangaroos? Aika oireellista ettei tästä tuubasta ole suomenkielistä sivua. Tää on selvästikin jotain idealistista höpöhöpöä. Typerän nimen takana on australialainen mamu talousliberalismin Nyrkissä:

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 306:     Chalmers argues for an "explanatory gap" from the objective to the subjective, and criticizes physicalist explanations of mental experience, making him a dualist. Chalmers characterizes his view as "naturalistic dualism": naturalistic because he believes mental states supervene "naturally" on physical systems (such as brains); dualist because he believes mental states are ontologically distinct from and not reducible to physical systems. He has also characterized his view by more traditional formulations such as property dualism.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 310:     In support of this, Chalmers is famous for his commitment to the logical (though, not natural) possibility of philosophical zombies.These zombies are complete physical duplicates of human beings, lacking only qualitative experience. Chalmers argues that since such zombies are conceivable to us, they must therefore be logically possible. Since they are logically possible, then qualia and sentience are not fully explained by physical properties alone; the facts about them are further facts. Instead, Chalmers argues that consciousness is a fundamental property ontologically autonomous of any known (or even possible) physical properties, and that there may be lawlike rules which he terms "psychophysical laws" that determine which physical systems are associated with which types of qualia.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 326:     Orjien luominen valokuvamaisilla muistoilla helpottaa tätä salailua. Mutta he eivät ole kyenneet täysin peittämään miljoonia ohjelmoinnin tuhoamia hukkaan heitettyjä eläimiä. Monien vuosien ajan, he kykenivät peittämään jälkensä luokittelemalla uhrinsa skitsofreenikoiksi. Mutta nyt terapeutit kuzuvat niitä MPD tai DID tapauxixi. Sen jälkeen kun Karkki Jonesin aviomies paransi Karkin sen verran että hän kykeni kirjoittamaan kirjan jossa paljastettiin asioita joita hänelle oli tehty, salaisuus oli paljastettu (katso "The Control of Candy Jones Hypnotism and the CIA" by Donald Bain).

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 342:     Joulukuussa 1972, 47-vuotiaana, Karkki meni naimisiin Pitkät Kalsarit Nebelin kanssa, New Yorkin menestyneimmän ja kiistanalaisimman radion talk-show-juontajan kanssa. He olivat seurustelleet vain 28 päivää, vaikka he olivat tunteneet kumpikin vuodesta 1941. Melkein heti Nebel huomasi jotain outoa uudessa vaimossaan. Hän puhui toisinaan oudolla, aggressiivisella äänellä ja osoitti voimakkaita mielialan vaihteluita. Hän kärsi myös unettomuudesta, joten kesäkuussa 1973 Nebel tarjoutui yrittämään hypnotisoida hänet parantumaan siitä. Karkki väitti, että häntä ei voitu hypnotisoida, ja vaikka Nebel ei ollut koskaan tehnyt niin ennen, hän oli vakuuttunut, että hänen laaja lukeneisuutensa aiheesta selvittäisi hiänet. Näyttää siltä,   että hän teki erittäin ehdottoman aiheen, melkein ainutlaatuisella tavalla, vaikka ehkä tätä auttoi hiänen suuri uskonsa mieheensä. Riippumatta siitä miksi, hiän nukkui ensimmäisen kunnon yöunensa kuukausiin Nebelin hypnoosin seurauksena. Myöhemmillä istunnoilla hän alkoi spontaanisti ikääntyä ja puhui lapsen äänellä. Mutta se oli toinen, ei-lapsuuden, agressio, joka huolestutti Nebeliä, joka sai Karkin ostamaan hänelle hienon nauhurin tallentaakseen nämä häiritsevät keskustelut hypnoosin avulla. Myöhemmin kesäkuussa ilmestyi Karkin lapsuuden kimittävän leikkikaverin Arlettyn ja Ranun persoonallisuudet, ja hypnoottisen agression kautta syntyi synkkä tarina hypnoosista ja mielenhallinnasta Candyn menneisyydessä.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 346:     McArthur kertoi hiänelle, että hänen pitäisi olla hyvässä kunnossa salatyössään, ja ehdotti, että hän tarvitsisi vitamiineja, joita hiän ruiskutti hänelle siitä lähtien suonensisäisesti. Nämä "vitamiinit" olivat itse asiassa erittäin kokeellisia koronalääkkeitä. Hiän kertoi hänelle myös hypnoosista ja sen käytöstä ja osoitti sen hypnotisoimalla hänet, vaikka hän väittikin, ettei häntä voitu hypnotisoida. Silloin hän löysi Ariettyn Karkin sienipaikasta ja kexi että voisi saada hiänestä jonkun, jota hän voisi käyttää samalla lailla kuin Karkkia. Arietty ongittiin ulos sienestä ja pantiin Karkin taskuun, ja todellisuudessa juuri hiänet lähetettiin kimittämään erilaisille kokeellisille tehtäville kotimaassa ja ulkomailla. Karkista tuli myös ulkonäöltään Arietty, jolla on peruukki ja erilainen meikki. Tietenkin hiän oli ohjelmoitu olemaan muistamatta kaikkea tätä, mutta kun Donald Bain puhui hiänelle kirjastaan, hiänellä oli vielä yksi passikuva Ranusta ja Arietystä (jonka Bain julkaisi), Ranulla oli siinä musta käkkärä peruukki ja tumma meikki. Bain järkyttyi: vizi oliko McArthur neekeri! Ja kimittävä Arietty peukalonkokoinen, Ranun kynnetöntä sormea miltei lyhyempi! Hirveää!

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 393:     47,5 minuuttia -- Kuvaruutu muuttuu mustaksi lukuunottamatta ameebaa josta tulee kaksi ameebaa. Kun tämä pieni ameeba monistuu, avustaja rohkaisee lasta: "ON O.K. MONISTUA. JUMALA HALUAA SINUN MONISTUVAN." Muista, nämä ohjelmoijat toimivat esikoulun opettajina vastasyntyneille sivupersoonille. Ohjelmoijien täytyy näyttää kuvia joita lapsi voi ymmärtää. Tämä konsepti jossa luuta ensin katkaistaan ja sitten monistuu ja nyt konsepti ameebojen jakautumisesta esitetään sillä tavalla että lapsen mieli ymmärtää sen.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 410:     70,0 minuuttia -- Vesiputouksia ilmestyy. Lapselle sanotaan: "PESE ITSESI PUHTAAKSI."

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 504:   Esimerkiksi, jos meidän emotionaalinen tarpeemme joka suuntautuu johonkin jota me etsimme on suuri, sanotaanpa että vaimo odottaa sodassa olevaa miestään, se saattaa lähettää tämän tarpeen alas aivoihin kognitiivisia demoneja varten jotka kiinnittyvät tämän pitkään odotetun henkilön tunnistukseen, ja mieli saa itsensä näkemään hänen kassinsa väkijoukossa vilkkaalla rautatieasemalla ennenkuin kassien omistaja saapuu.

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 510:   Mitä tapahtuu hypnoosissa näille kognitiivisille demoni-prosesseille jotka normaalisti ottaisivat ohjeita tietoiselta mieleltä? No vaikka kertomalla että kohteen muna jäykistyy, hypnotisoija saa vallan niistä kognitiivisista toiminta-demoneista jotka saavat munan jäykistymään. Ja muna jäykistyy! Sille ei mahda mitään! Voi jumpe! Cisco Caramba on tämän kokenut. Tänään on poliittisesti epäkorrektia myöntää että hypnotisoijalla on valta saada yksilö tekemään sellaista mitä hän haluaisi mutta hän ei normaalisti pysty, mutta valitettavasti hypnoosi antaa tämän vallan. 

xxx/ellauri168.html on line 518: Hypnotismissa ja uskonnossa uhrilla täytyy olla usko ja luottamus hypnotisoijaansa. Hypnoosi kuten uskonto on luonteeltaan subjektiivinen. Jos tämä ohjelmoija on ohjelmoitavan sivupersoonan luoja-jumala, ja tämä sivupersoona on lisäksi hypnoottisen huumeen vaikutuksen alla joka tekee hänet halukkaaksi totella, on helppo nähdä kuinka uhri luopuu kaikista esteistä sillä "jumala" tai "avaruusolento" kyllä tietää mikä on parasta. Mitä parempi ja vahvempi uhrin ja ohjelmoijan suhde on, sitä paremmin hypnoottiset käskyt toimivat. Jos orja näkee mestarinsa uskonnollisena guruna (tai Päivi Räsäsen kaltaisena suurena lääkärinä), tämä lisää hänen tahtoaan hyväksyä hypnoottiset käskyt. Pidä mielessäsi että tämä orja on valmennettu rakastamaan isäntäänsä varauksetta. Kyllä, hyväntahtoinen diktaattori on historiallisesti saavuttanut kissojen ihailun, ja monet terapeuteista ovat yksinkertaisesti egoistisia sadisteja. Eivät kuitenkaan tämä kirjailija Fritz The Cat eikä hänen kolleegansa Cisco Caramba. Oletko jo avannut äänesi Cisco? En, sepalus on jumissa.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 38: Kelpaan tälläisenä! Pidän izestäni sellaisena kuin olen! Tällä kannalla on olleet hullut narsistit maailman sivu, niinkuin esim Marion "Pat" Roberzon. Lukuunottamatta Walt Disneytä, joka tiettävästi oli self-deprecating and shy. "The boss is here", kuiski alaiset kun Walt yskähteli hallissa. Nyt suu soukasti. Tulee mieleen tietokonelingvistiikan tutkimusyxikkö makkaratalossa vuonna kivi ja puu. Niin ja Miki Liukkonen, joka häpesi huonouttaan niin että teki seppukun vuonna 2023 (albumi 307).

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 45: In principle, conspiracy theories are not always false by default and their validity depends on evidence just as in any theory. However, they are often discredited a priori due to the cumbersome and improbable nature of many of them.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 47: Psychologists usually attribute belief in conspiracy theories and finding a conspiracy where there is none to a number of psychopathological conditions such as paranoia, schizotypy, narcissism, and insecure attachment, or to a form of cognitive bias called "illusory pattern perception". However, the current scientific consensus holds that most conspiracy theorists are not pathological, precisely because their beliefs ultimately rely on cognitive tendencies that are neurologically hardwired in the human species and probably have deep evolutionary origins, including natural inclinations towards anxiety and agency detection. Agent detection is the inclination for animals, including humans, to presume the purposeful intervention of a sentient or intelligent agent in situations that may or may not involve one. Pieni vinous on vain luonnollista (see Fig.3). 

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 143: 	1938 -- Valtin äiti kuolee kaasumyrkytykseen. Isabelle onnistuu vetämään Eliaksen turvaan, mutta Waltin äiti kuolee. Walt got a call one day that there was a malfunction of the heating system in Elias and Flora Disney's house that the boys had had built with warp speed by studio workers who did not know what they did. Walt and Roy's parents had suffered carbon monoxide poisoning, and Flora died. Walt went to her funeral, and then immediately back to work. He never talked about the incident again. According to historians, cinema offered Walt a way to emote that he couldn't in his personal life. That's why there are no mothers in Disney cartoons. No fathers either except a bad'un, Zeke. Walt did not attend his father's funeral either. He was on vacation in South Africa.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 175: Walt vietti monia öitä Disney-studioilla ja myöhemmin hänellä oli oma yksityinen kortteli Disneylandin keskellä. Hän kärsi toistuvasti unettomuudesta. Hermojen ja unettomuuden vuoksi hän otti alkoholia ja rauhoittavia lääkkeitä. Hän vietti joskus viikkokausia Holmby Hillsin asunnossaan. Suurin keskustelunaihe studion henkilökunnan keskuudessa oli Waltin outo käytös -- hän ei ollut käytettävissä kuin vasta myöhään iltapäivällä, jolloin hän tuli esiin studion maanalaisesta tunneliverkostosta jossa hän niinsanotusti "jutteli ylläpito-insinöörien kanssa" joka päivä. Hänen kiinteistönsä arvo hänen kuollessaan oli 35 miljoonaa dollaria, josta hänen vaimonsa peri puolet.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 184: Despite watching Disney movies and films many times, you may not realize that some characters, who you think are harmless, are actually villains. Alright, let’s find out the answer with the top 10 Disney Characters who are not as good as what you assume. Bah, boring. Minor sex offenders Peter Pan and Aladdin. I was expecting Mickey Mouse and Scrooge McDuck.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 201:   The church's theology is a syncretistic belief system, including elements of Buddhism, Christianity, esoteric mysticism and alchemy, with a belief in angels and elementals (or spirits of nature). It centers on communications received from Ascended Masters through the Holy Spirit. Many of the Ascended Masters, such as Sanat Kumara, Maitreya, Djwal Khul, El Morya, Kuthumi, Paul the Venetian, Serapis Bey, the Master Hilarion, the Master Jesus and Saint Germain, have their roots in Theosophy and the writings of Madame Blavatsky, C.W. Leadbeater, and Alice A. Bailey. Others, such as Buddha, Confucius, Lanto and Lady Master Nada, were identified as Ascended Masters in the "I AM" Activity or the Bridge to Freedom. Some, such as Lady Master Lotus and Lanello, are Ascended Masters who were first identified as such by Elizabeth Clare Prophet. All in all, she identified more than 200 Ascended Masters that were not identified as Masters of the Ancient Wisdom in the original teachings of Theosophy.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 269: Witness Lee (Chinese: 李常受; pinyin: Lǐ Chángshòu; 1905 – June 9, 1997) was a Chinese Christian preacher and hymnist belonging to the Christian group known as the local churches (or Local Church) in Taiwan and the United States. He was also the founder of Living Stream Ministry. Lee was born in 1905 in the city of Yantai, Shandong, China, to a Southern Baptist family. He became a Christian in 1925 after hearing the preaching of an evangelist named Peace Wang and later joined the Christian work started by Watchman Nee. Like Nee, Lee emphasized what he considered the believers' subjective experience and enjoyment of Christ as life for the building up of the church, not as an organization, but as the Body of Christ.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 278: Juutalainen yrittäjä Michel Montaigne aforisoi viisaasti: vaikka istuisit maailman korkeimman teknologian atk-tuolissa, viime kädessä istut silti omalla perseellä.  Tämä luku on suunniteltu kattamaan korkean teknologian mielenhallinnan monimutkaisuudet helppotajuisella kielellä. Kehitys kuitu-optiikassa, tietokoneissa, sähköisessä kommunikaatiossa, nanoteknologiassa, biosiruissa & neurosähköisessä tutkimuksessa ovat yhdessä tuomassa ihmiskunnan pisteeseen jossa yksi keskitetty monoliittinen Peto-tietokone pystyy kontrolloimaan ihmiskuntaa. Tämä lopullinen mielenhallinta-orjuus on nyt mahdollista. Me olemme sen toteuttamisen ensihoidossa. Nanorobotit ja holografiset implantit ovat vielä  "vaiheessa".

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 282:   Mihin tämä artikkeli pyrkii?  Syvimmät kiitokseni teille uhreille. Toivon että olen saavuttanut teidän luottamuksenne. Psykologisissa julkaisuissa meistä onnettomista terapeuteista on tehty naurunalaisia. Jos ennakkoluuloton henkilö vertailee eri ihmisten kertomuksia siitä mitä meille implanttien uhreille on tehty, ei pitäisi olla epäilystäkään etteikö näitä implantteja käytettäisi yhä suuremmassa määrin tyhmiin massoihin. Uusi maailmanjärjestys käyttää vahvistimia, generaattoreita, elektroniikkaa, kuuntelulaitteita, ei-ionisoituvaa sähkömagneettista säteilyä, äänienergiaa joka polttaa ihoa, nanoteknologiaa ja seurantalaitteita, mukaanlukien kiertoilmagrillit,  kuljetettavat kädessä pidettävät luurit sekä skannerit -- nimetäkseni vain muutamia. Vanha maailmanjärjestys käytti sentään vain suht harmittomia taikoja, amuletteja, loizuja, enkeleitä, manausta, henkiä sun muita pirulaisia, nimetäxemme vain muutamia.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 313:   Ihmisaivot, JOS niissä on memex-implantti, ovat yhteydessä peto-tietokoneeseen. JOS niihin  on asennettu jonkinlainen virtuaalinen "holodeck" -liitäntä (lisävaruste), peto tietokone luo keinotekoisen maiseman orjan ympärille jota hän ei voi erottaa todellisuudesta. Tällä idealla oli joku filosofinen nimityskin, juu uniargumentti. Se on erittäinkin hanurista. 

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 317: Länsimaisessa filosofiassa ajatuksen esitti ensimmäisenä epäluotettava René Descartes tutkielmassaan Mietiskelyjä ensimmäisestä filosofiasta. Itämaisessa filosofiassa samankaltainen argumentti esiintyy Zhuangzin filosofiassa niin sanottuna ”perhosen uni” -mietelmänä. Mietelmässä Zhuangzi näkee unta jossa hän on perhonen. Herättyään hän havaitsee olevansa Zhuangzi. Mutta miten hän voi määrittää onko hän Zhuangzi, joka on juuri lakannut uneksimasta olevansa perhonen, vai perhonen, joka on juuri alkanut uneksia olevansa Zhuangzi. Vaiko kärpänen jonka unta tää kaikki on. It's no use Mr. Russell, it's turtles all the way down. 

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 328:   Tarkastellaanpa kolmea uhria jotka kärsivät miehenhallinnan & ruumiinhallinnan implanteista ja jotka tämä kirjailija (Fritz the Cat) tuntee. Me voimme viitata heihin termillä "Amy", uhri Nro. 1001..., "Betty", uhri Nro. 1002..., ja "Cathy", uhri Nro. 1003.... -- "Amy" löydettiin kun käytettiin spektri-analyysilaitetta joka havaitsi että 750 MHz:n aallot olivat kohdistuneet häneen. "Betty" päätteli että häntä vastaan hyökättiin kokonaisella radio-mikroaaltojen spektrillä jotka pommittivat häntä Morsen kaavan mukaan. Tämä signaalien vastaanotin oli kuituoptinen ja se oli naamioitu näyttämään tavalliselta häpykarvalta joka jatkuvasti poltti reikiä hänen alusvaatteisiinsa. Luultavasti, tämä sivuvaikutus oli virhe jota he eivät olleet saaneet korjattua. Cathya pommitettiin ELF & VLF -aalloilla joiden taajuudet olivat 435 & 1080 MHz. Nämä taajuudet ovat ikkunoita ihmisen tajuntaan. He käyttivät myös typen partikkelien säteitä joka tuottaa "typpi-narkoosin" uhrille. Xenon-lamput voivat myös vaikuttaa miehen ruumiiseen. 1.000 - 1.200 MHz:n taajuus voi vaikuttaa geeneihin. Implanttien RF-taajuudet ovat vahingoittaneet uhrien silmiä. Vaikka tämä antaa meille lähtökohdan keskusteluumme, nämä eivät ole ainoita taajuuksia jotka uhkaavat miehenhallinnan uhreja.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 361: Valitettavaa ihmisten kannalta, ELF-aallot voivat tunkeutua melkein minne tahansa. GWEN-tornien tarkoituksena on amerikkalaisten mielenhallinta. Televisioita, kännyköitä, pölynimureita ja jopa tuulettimia ja viirikukkoja voidaan käyttää signaalien lähettämiseen ja viestien vastaanottamiseen. Monia outoja torneja ja lähettimiä on rakennettu kaikkialle Yhdysvaltoihin viime vuosina.

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 393: She has thousands of followers and has made millions of dollars performing as Ramtha at seminars ($1,000 a crack) and at her Ramtha School of Enlightenment, and from the sales of tapes, books, and accessories (Clark and Gallo 1993). She must have hypnotic powers. Searching for self-fulfillment, otherwise normal people obey her command to spend hours blindfolded in a cold, muddy, doorless maze. In the dark, they seek what Ramtha calls the ‘void at the center.’

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 395: Knight says she used to be “spiritually restless,” but not any more. Ramtha from Atlantis via Lemuria has enlightened her. He first appeared to her, she says, while she was in business school having extraordinary experiences with UFOs. She must have a great rapport with her spirit companion, since he shows up whenever she needs him to put on a performance.  It is not clear why Ramtha would choose Knight, but it is very clear why Knight would choose Ramtha: fame and fortune, or simple delusion.  

xxx/ellauri169.html on line 401: JZ gets her last name from the first man she married, Jeff Knight, who did not leave this planet with much good to say about his ex-bride. Jeff and Judy started out as horse breeders. Jeff Knight died of AIDS in 1994. Since that time JZ has been married five more times.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 87: It is not now as it hath been of yore;—			No nyt ei enää tunnu siltä,		

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 135: And the Babe leaps up on his Mother's arm:—		Ja vauva notkuu äidin käsivarrella:	

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 150:                       And not in utter nakedness,	Eikä ihan nakuna,				

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 189:                       But it will not be long		Mut aika pikaiseen				

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 193: The little Actor cons another part;			Esittämään toista roolia,		

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 213: A Presence which is not to be put by;			Läsnäolo jota ei käy kieltäminen,	

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 229: Perpetual benediction: not indeed			Niin tekee mieli aina kiitellä: ei niinkään	

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 241: Moving about in worlds not realised,			Joka heiluu mahdottomissa maailmoissa,		

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 276:                 Though nothing can bring back the hour	Vaikkei mikään tuo takas sitä hetkeä		

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 278:                 We will grieve not, rather find		Me ei surra, vaan pikemminkin löydetään		

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 288: Forebode not any severing of our loves!			Älkää luulko ettenmä enää teitä rakasta!	

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 300: Another race hath been, and other palms are won.	Toinen rotu meni ja toiset voitonpalmut tuli.	

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 327: On 31.50, Mrs Cantrip is in the kitchen talking to Wexford and Burden when a microphone appears at the top of the screen for a couple of seconds. Another goof.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 330: 	When Elizabeth Nightingale is murdered, DCI Wexford has to sort his way through quite a number of suspects - from the gardener to the household staff, to a permanent Dutch house guest, to the husband Quentin and the victim's brother and his wife. While trying to figure out what really happened on that fateful night that cost Elizabeth's life, Reg Wexford uncovers that the Nightingales' marriage was not as happy as it seemed and that there is a dark secret to be revealed.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 335: In a 2013 interview, Rendell stated: Wexford is a Liberal Democrat though, and I am a Labour party member, in fact a Labour peer, so I am further to the left than him. Wexford is an intelligent, sensitive man. He has a placid wife, Dora, and two daughters, Sheila and Sylvia. He has a good relationship with Sheila (his favourite) but a difficult relationship with Sylvia (who feels slighted though he has never actually intended to slight her). He also has a suspiciously strong friendship with intelligent, sensitive DI Mike Burden. White man's burden. Just joking, Mike is white too. Rendall says that Kingsmarkham in Sussex  "is not romantic at all."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 342: Another Wexford book. The title is taken from Shakespeare's 'Sonnet 146': "So shalt thou feed on Death, that feeds on men, And Death once dead, there's no more dying then." Sonet 146, jonka William Shakespeare on osoittanut sielulleen, "syntiselle maalleen", on vetoomus itselleen arvostamaan sisäisiä ominaisuuksia ja tyydytystä ulkomuodon sijaan. Bill oli Reg Wexfordin lailla turhamainen miekkonen.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 344: The missing text at the beginning of line two is generally attributed to a printing error, since in the earliest version of the sonnet the second line begins with a repetition of the last three words of the previous lines, commonly called an eye-skip error, which breaks the iambic pentameter. Shakespeare's intention for the line is a subject of debate among scholars, with most modern scholars accepting the emendation, "feeding", based on internal evidence. Other guesses include "Thrall to", "Fool'd by", "Hemm'd by", "Foil'd by", "Fenced by", "Flatt'ring", "Spoiled by", "Lord of", and "Pressed by". Unfortunately, none of the "guesses" seem to work. "Feeding," for example, tends to "explain the joke," and does not let the poem build to the implication that the soul itself is culpable in man's struggle for spirit over the corporal self. Perhaps a better foot would be "disrobe." Musta paras on Lord of.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 370: The above is an excerpt from The Picture of Dorian Gray. I am not understanding the meaning of the phrase "the meanest flower might blow".

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 384: Blow: What it says - unless it is an archaic version of "bloom" as suggested in another answer. I'll let the rest of my post stay for reference.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 404: Taraxacum, or the dandelion, it's not actually the flower that you blow on it's the seed pods. In the wild these are taken by the wind and spread around so they can grow. Another name for this is Chinese lettuce, they take the leaves from the plant and either smoke it to get high or use it as a tea to drink for its relaxation properties.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 411:     The Gilly Hopkins explanation is an extended joke. Regrettably, Mr. Randolph, who seems to have had a better grasp of the situation than the other participants in the fictitious conversation, did not see fit to clarify Wilde's intended meaning with regard to "blows." I blame the author. –

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 426: The first part of the riddle was already solved above regarding the meaning of the word "meanest" (the superlative degree of the adjective "mean"): lowliest (garden-variety; nothing out of ordinary). As regards the word "blow", it's been even easier than that: in this particular case it has a sense of "to bloom" ("to be in blossom").

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 459: Highly active question. Earn 10 reputation (not counting the association bonus) in order to answer this question. The reputation requirement helps protect this question from spam and non-answer activity.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 526: Sitten tapahtui kauheita. Joku rando Twitterissä julkaisi leikillisen kyselyn siitä, tulisiko Ukkolan seuraavassa Pressiklubin lähetyksessä vetää päähänsä aasinhattu, Perussuomalaiset rp -puolueen lippalakki, Ku Klux Klanin kaapu vai Eri Keeper -pullo. Ukkolaa itseään ei twiittiin ollut tägätty. Tämä oli törkeää vainoamista ja nettikiusaamista, sillä karnevalisaatio kohdistui muuhun kuin Sanna Ukkolan hyväksymään ja riidattomasti naurunalaiseksi designoituun kohteeseen. Ukkola veti tästä Eri Keeperin nenäänsä, kiskoi kalkkunakondorin peräpäästä punotun sotapäähineen päähän ja kävi välittömästi sananvapaustaistoon julman vitsailijan harjoittamaa huumorin ja ilmaisunvapauden väärinkäyttöä vastaan. Itseään huumorin- ja suhteellisuudentajuisena pitävä Ukkola jäljitti vitsailijan työpaikan esimiehen ja lähetti tälle sähköpostia, jossa vaati puuttumista em. Eri Keeper -vitsiin, mikä on todellakin normaalia, henkisesti tasapainoiselle ihmiselle ominaista toimintaa tilanteessa, jossa heidän omista pointittomista vitseistään lasketaan leikkiä.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 548: Ukkola on sittemmin kommentoinut Eri Keeper -välikohtausta julkisuudessa hyvin vähän, mikä johtunee hienotunteisuudesta muita osapuolia kohtaan ja varsinkin siitä, että hänelle on fyysisesti mahdotonta myöntää olleensa väärässä. 

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 580: Ukkolan aiheet tapaavat olla, kuten englanniksi sanotaan, ripped from the headlines, paitsi että Ukkola hakee otsikkonsa mieluiten somevirrasta, koska ei kestä lukea muiden toimittajien juttuja. Hänen suosikkeihinsa kuuluu pöyristymisception, eli toisten pöyristymisestä pöyristyminen, samoin kuin kaikkien yhteiskunnallis-kulttuuristen rakenteiden olemassaolon kiistäminen ilman perusteita. Yleisesti voidaan somekohun kuolinaika määrittää siksi hetkeksi, jolloin Sanna Ukkola julkaisee siitä kolumnin.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 616:   Puhumme, kunnioitettavat veljet, siitä minkä omilla silmillänne näette, mitä yhteisillä kyynelillä voihkimme. Ilostelee hilpeä kunnottomuus, hävytön tiede, irrallinen rekisterikilpi; pyhien pyhyyttä halvexitaan, ja sitä millä on iso voima ja välttämättömyys, jumalanpalveluksen majesteettisuus, porukat ei kun  hylkii, saastuttaa, pitää pilkkanaan. Tästä terve oppi pervertoituu, ja kaikenlaisia virheitä levitetään julkeasti. Ei pyhien lait, ei oikeusistuimet, ei instituutit, ei mitkään pyhemmät  kurit ole turvassa lässyttäjien epixeltä röyhkeydeltä.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 630:   des Esseintes istuu takan ääressä jalat takkakoiralla. Liekit nuoleskelee tohveleiden pohjia. Matalamielisten moukkien vihattava aikakausi on nyt kestänyt noin miljoona vuotta, loppu saattaa häämöttää kaikexi onnexi. Moreaukin oli tommonen ylimaallisen himon ja perverssiyden sekä hekkuman peukuttaja, hassussa venehatussa. Tuskallista kakkaa kantaa harteillaan. Ihan tulee Baudelairen runot mieleen.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 634: Mutta jo s 143 lähtien Huisman alkaa kiertää paavinuskoa kuin kissa kuumaa puuroa. Mietin taas mikä antenni se on joka alkaa vastaanottaa uskonsanomaa. Jakkoh-hintikalla K oli niinkö B plus reflexiivisyysaxiooma. Mä vähän epäilen. Toi uskonvarmuus on kyllä jotain muuta, pikemminkin neighborhood-tyyppistä preferenssilogiikkaa, koska se sallii yhteensopimattomia vakaumuxia. Will to believe, siitä siinon kysymys. Uskolla on propositionaalista sisältöä vaan siteexi, se ei oikeastaan ole propositionaalinen attitydi ollenkaan vaan pikemminkin jonkinlainen ruumiinasento, niinkuin optimismi vaikka. Sitä kuvaa parhaiten suisnan uskonahdistus: missä sehdä? Missä sehdä? MISÄ SEHDÄ? Syän muavon. Niäh! Kun riittävästi ahdistaa on apukin lähinnä, se löytyy omasta hypothalamuxesta. Tän luottamuxen tärkein tehtävä on pitää yllä toivoa ja tiimihenkeä. Ihan sama millä kuvioilla, kuten uskontojen kirjavuus jo todistaa. Muze elin on olemassa, ja on ollut ihan matelijavaiheesta, koska sille kelpaa mikä tahansa potaska. Pitäis tutkia missä kohtaa se on muilla eusosiaalisilla lajeilla. Esim ne peilisolut missä niitä on?

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 660: Richard*: Indeed not. As I said in my previous e-mail it is pertinent to realise that no scientist has been able to locate the self, by whatever name, despite all their brain-scans ... and I also said ‘from what is implied therein’ when referring to the ‘Time’ magazine’s article. Funny actually, it should not be hard to miss,  like a homunculus, a little man resembling a mandragora root. Maybe they just havent looked hard enough.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 663: Please note that the text above and below was written by the feeling-being ‘Peter’ and feeling-being ‘Vinetto’ while they lived in a pragmatic (methodological), still-in-control/same-way-of-being Virtual Freedom before becoming actually free.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 672: This long-awaited public announcement, uploaded wirelessly to the World Wide Web via a solar-powered notebook from the navigable head of a remote river system in a far-flung wilderness area, ushers in a brand new era in human experience and history, in the opening weeks of the year 2010, the consequences of which will have far-reaching implications and ramifications for anyone vitally interested in both an actual and a virtual freedom from the human condition.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 687:   Ultimately it involves self-immolation – rather like Kliban's parking meter violation. What this means will become clearer as you read on. We can confirm however that the result of not having a ‘self’ is truly a magical, wonderful and freeing experience. Not anything like what you have been lead to believe by reading/watching really bad sci-fi involving lobotomised zombies like the dementors in His Master's Voice!

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 697:    What is the meaning of ‘matter is not merely passive’?

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 779:    How do you know you are not God/ the Antichrist?

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 847:     You cannot change Human Nature.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 857:     Eating meat is not harmless.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 859:     Apperception is just another identification.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 861:     The ‘I’ does not really exist.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 863:     ‘I’ cannot get rid of ‘me’.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 871:     Richard is not the first to be free from the Human Condition.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 877:    Actualism is not new.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 879:    The actualism method is not unique.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 881:     A Pure Consciousness Experience is not universal.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 885:    The actualism method does not work.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 919:   Truth cannot be spoken.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 935: P.S. Richard* likes to live in relative anonymity in his own dreamtime and hence only his first name is used here. He is not accepting coffee invitations from believers. FAQ Richard*!

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 966:     Perhaps we do not give these scientists enough credit for the faith they possess. Yes, to believe in this type of human evolution takes a whole lot of faith. Sadly, their faith is placed in the wrong location and in an untrue process. If only they were able to place that faith in the real designer behind the design. I believe it is imperative we educate ourselves and teach this generation as Paul warned Timothy to “keep that which is committed to your trust, avoiding oppositions of science falsely so called” (1 Timothy 6:20). So I'm simplifying the quote, but I don't care. Evolution is not science. It is a theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation” (dictionary.com). 

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 984: Nykyisin gnostilaisuus nähdään usein varhaisen kristinuskon kanssa kilpailleena uskontona, joka irtaantui kristinuskosta tai kehittyi sen rinnalla. Gnostilaisuuden synnystä ei kuitenkaan ole yhtä kaikkien hyväksymää käsitystä. Gnostilaisuuden ajatukset pohjautuvat pitkälti platonismiin, erityisesti keskiplatonismiin, sekä juutalaisuuteen. Esimerkiksi ajatus demiurgista pohjautuu Platonin dialogiin Timaios. Näiden lisäksi gnostilaisuuteen vaikuttivat kristinusko sekä babylonialais-iranilaiset uskonnot. Kristillisestä gnostilaisuudesta puhutaan silloin, kun edellä esitettyihin perignostilaisiin ajatuksiin yhdistyy kristillisiä aineksia, kuten Jeesuksen opetuksia ja hänen välittäjäroolinsa pelastavan tiedon tuojana.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 987: Gnosis ei viittaa tietoon tavanomaisessa merkityksessä, vaan siihen että ihminen on tietyllä tavalla vastaanottavainen mystiselle tai esoteeriselle kokemukselle jumaluudesta. Suurimmassa osassa gnostilaisia järjestelmiä tämä 'tieto' jumaluudesta on itsessään pelastuksen aikaansaava tekijä. Tämä 'tieto' yhdistetään yleisesti sisäiseen 'tietämykseen' tai itsetutkiskeluun, jota muun muassa Plotinos korosti. Ennen uskonnollista merkitystä termiä 'gnostilainen' käytettiin kuitenkin filosofisessa merkityksessä useissa antiikin filosofisissa perinteissä, mikä täytyy pitää mielessä termin uskonnollista käyttöä tutkiessa.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1050: Maria kyseenalaistaa Jeesuksen keskustelutyyliä. Ja Maria lähestyi häntä, kaatui, jumaloi jalkojaan ja suuteli käsiään ja sanoi: "Niin, Herrani, paljasta meille: Mitä hyötyä on keskellä olevien tavoista? Olemme kuulleet sinulta, että ne ovat suurten kurinteiden ylle. Kuinka sitten, Herrani, me sitten poistamme heidät tai pakenemme niistä? Tai millä tavalla he tarttuvat sieluihin? Tai - kuinka kauan he viettävät aikaa kurituksissaan? Armahda meitä, Herraamme, pelastajaamme, jotta keskellä olevien tapojen tuomioiden vastaanottajat eivät kanttaa sielujamme ja tuomitsisi meitä heidän pahoissa tuomioissaan, jotta me itse voisimme periä isäsi valo, äläkä ole kurja ja köyhä."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1074: Kiroajan rankaisemisesta.... [ja johdata heidät tulijokille ja tulimerelle] ja kostaa siitä vielä 6kk 8p. Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen keskelle, ja jokainen keskellä oleva viivoitin kurittaa sitä kurituksissaan vielä kuusi kuukautta ja kahdeksan päivää. Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen Valon Neitsyen pakeille, joka tuomitsee hyvän ja pahan, jotta hän voi tuomita sen. Ja kun pallo kääntyy, hän luovuttaa sen vastaanottajilleen, jotta he voivat heittää sen pallon koteloihin. Ja pallon orjuuttajat johdavat sen veteen, joka on pallon alapuolella; ja siitä tulee pannukakku. se tyhjeneä tuleen ja syö siihen, kunnes se puhdistaa sen täysin.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1076: "Ja sitten tulee Yaluham, Sabaōthin vastaanotin, Adamat, joka ojentaa sieluille unohduksen kupin, ja hän tuo kupin, joka on täynnä unohduksen vettä, ja ojentaa sen sielulle, ja se juo sen ja unohtaa kaikki alueet ja kaikki alueet, joihin se on mennyt. Ja he heittävät sen ruumiiseen, joka viettää aikansa jatkuvasti levottomana sydämessään. Tämä on kiroajan rankaiseminen." 

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1078: Maria jatkoi ja sanoi: "Herrani, mies, joka sinnikkäästi herjaa, jos hän tulee ulos ruumiista, mitä hän saa tai mikä on, hänen kurituksensa?" Herjaajan kurittamisesta. Jeesus sanoi: "Mies, joka sinnikkäästi herjaa, jos hänen aikansa on päättynyt pallon läpi, että hän tulee ulos ruumiista, sitten Abiout ja Charmōn, Ariēlin vastaanottajat, tulevat, johdattavat sielunsa ulos ruumiista ja viettävät kolme päivää kiertämällä sitä ja opettamalla sitä maailman luotujen suhteen. "Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen Ameuteen Ariēlin edessä, ja hän rankaisee sitä kurituksissaan 11kk 21p.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1080: "Sen jälkeen he kantavat sen Valon Neitsyelle, joka tuomitsee vanhurskaat ja syntiset, jotta hän voi tuomita sen. Ja kun pallo kääntyy, hän luovuttaa sen vastaanottajilleen, jotta he voivat heittää sen pallon æoneihin. Ja pallon orjuuttajat johtavat sen veteen, joka on pallon alapuolella; ja siitä tulee sekopää ja se syö siihen, kunnes se puhdistaa sen täysin. "Ja Yaluham, Sabaōthin vastaanottaja, Adamas, tuo unohduksen kupin ja ojentaa sen sielulle, ja se juo sitä ja unohtaa kaikki alueet ja kaiken ja kaikki alueet, joiden kautta se on mennyt. Ja he toimittavat sen ruumiille, joka viettää aikansa kärsien. Tämä on herjaajan rankaisemista."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1082: Maria sanoi suu märkänä: "Voi, voi, syntisille!" Salome vastasi ja sanoi: "Herrani Jeesus, murhaaja, joka ei ole koskaan tehnyt mitään syntiä, vaan murhannut, jos hän tulee ulos ruumiista, mikä on hänen rankaisemisensa? Murhaajan rankaisemisesta. Jeesus vastasi ja sanoi: "Murhaaja, joka ei ole koskaan tehnyt mitään syntiä, mutta murhannut, jos hänen aikansa on päättynyt pallon läpi, että hän tulee ulos ruumiista, Yaldabaōthin vastaanottajat tulevat ja johdattavat sielunsa ulos ruumiista ja sitovat sen jaloillaan suureen demoniin hevosen kasvoilla, ja hän viettää kolme päivää kiertäen sen kanssa maailmaa. "Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen kylmän ja lumen alueille, ja he kostelevat sitä siellä 3v 6kk. "Sen jälkeen he johtavat sen kaaokseen ennen Yaldabaōthia ja hänen 49 demoniaan, ja jokainen hänen demoneistaan vitsaa sitä vielä 3v 6kk."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1086: Peter tekee protestin naisista. Pietari sanoi: "Herrani, antakaa naisten lakata kyseenalaistamasta, jotta voimme myös kyseenalaistaa." Jeesus sanoi Marialle ja naisille: "Antakaa mahdollisuus miehillenne veljillenne, jotta hekin kyseenalaistavat." Pietari vastasi ja sanoi: "Herrani, ryöstäjä ja varas, jonka synti on sinnikkäästi, kun hän tulee ulos ruumiista, mikä on hänen rankaisemisensa?" Varkaan kurittamisesta. Jeesus sanoi: "Jos tällaisen aika päättyy pallon läpi, Adōnisin vastaanottajat tulevat hänen peräänsä ja johdattavat hänen sielunsa ulos ruumiista, ja he viettävät kolme päivää kiertäen sen kanssa ja opettaen sitä maailman luotujen suhteen. "Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen Amenteen Ariēlin eteen, ja hän kostaa sen 3kk 8p 2h.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1088:       "Sen jälkeen he johtavat sen kaaokseen ennen Yaldabaōthia ja hänen 49 demoniaan, ja jokainen hänen demoneistaan kostaa siitä vielä 3kk,8p, 2h. Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen keskelle, ja jokainen keskellä olevan tien viivain ottaa sen koston pimeän savunsa ja ilkeän tulituksensa kautta vielä 3kk, 8p, 2h." Ne 2 viimeistä tuntia ovat pahimmat. "Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen Valon Neitsyen luokse, joka tuomitsee vanhurskaat ja syntiset, jotta hän voi tuomita sen. Ja kun pallo kääntyy, hän luovuttaa sen vastaanottajilleen, jotta he voivat heittää sen pallon æoneihin. Ja he johdattavat sen veteen, joka on pallon alapuolella; |384. ja siitä tulee sekopää ja se syö siihen, kunnes se puhdistaa sen täysin."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1090: "Sen jälkeen tulee Yaluham, Sabaōthin vastaanottaja, Adamas, tuo unohduksen maljan ja antaa sen sielulle; ja se juo sitä ja unohtaa kaiken ja kaikki alueet, joille se oli mennyt. Ja he heittivät sen tylsään, pysähtymään ja sokeaan kehoon. Tämä on varkaan rankaiseminen."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1092: Prinssi Andrew vastasi ja sanoi: "Ylimielinen, nenäkäs mies, kun hän tulee ulos ruumiista, mitä hänelle tapahtuu?" Ylimielisen kurittamisesta. Jeesus sanoi: "Jos tällaisen aika päättyy pallon läpi, Ariēlin vastaanottajat tulevat hänen peräänsä ja johdattavat hänen sielunsa ulos [ruumiista] ja viettävät kolme päivää matkustaen ympäri maailmaa [sen kanssa] ja opettaen sitä maailman luotujen suhteen. Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen Amenteen ariēlin eteen; ja hän kostaa sen 20 kuukauden niitityksillään. Sen jälkeen he johtavat sen kaaokseen Ennen Jaldabaōthia ja hänen 49 demoniaan; ja Hän ja hänen demoninsa kostelevat sitä vielä 20 kuukautta."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1094: "Sen jälkeen he kantavat sen keskelle; ja jokainen keskellä oleva viivoitin ottaa siitä koston vielä 20kk. Ja sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen Valon Neitsyen luokse, jotta hän voi tuomita sen. Ja kun pallo kääntyy, hän luovuttaa sen vastaanottajilleen, jotta he voivat heittää sen pallon æoneihin. Ja pallon orjuuttajat johdattaa se veteen, joka on pallon alapuolella; ja siitä tulee valtava tuli ja se syö siihen, kunnes se puhdistaa sen. Ja vielä Yaluham, Sabaōthin vastaanottaja, Adamat, tulee ja tuo kupin unohduksen vedellä ja ojentaa sen sielulle; ja se juo ja unohtaa kaiken ja kaikki alueet, joille se oli mennyt. Ja he heittävät sen tylsään ja epämuodostumaiseen kehoon, niin että kaikki halveksivat sitä jatkuvasti. Tämä on ylimielisen ja nenäkkään ihmisen rankaiseminen."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1096: Miesopiskelijat pomppivat innoissaan ja taputtavat käsiään. Näiset päästävät ululointiääniä. Thomas sanoi: "Sinnikäs jumalanpilkka, mikä on hänen rankaisemisensa?" Jumalanpilkkaan kurittamisesta. Jeesus sanoi: "Jos tällaisen aika päättyy pallon läpi, Jaldabaōthin vastaanottajat tulevat hänen peräänsä ja sitovat hänet kielellään suureen demoniin hevosen kasvoilla; He viettävät kolme päivää matkustaen hänen kanssaan maailmassa ja kostaakseen hänelle. Sen jälkeen he johdattavat hänet kylmän ja lumen alueelle ja kostelevat häntä siellä 11 vuotta."

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1102:   "Kun aika on sitten päättynyt pallon läpi, Yaldabaōthin vastaanottajat tulevat sielunsa perään, ja hän 49 demoninsa kanssa kostaa sille 11 vuotta. Sen jälkeen he kuljettavat sen tulijokiin ja näkeviin pikimeriin, jotka ovat täynnä demoneja sikojen kasvoilla. He syövät niihin ja kostelevat heitä tulijoissa vielä 11 vuotta. Sen jälkeen he kantavat heidät pimeään tuomiopäivään asti, jolloin suuri pimeys tuomitaan; ja sitten ne hajotetaan ja tuhotaan." Niin oikein! Thomas sanoi: "Olemme kuulleet, että maan päällä on joitain, jotka ottavat urossiemenet ja naaraspuolisen kuukausittaisen veren ja tekevät siitä linssipuuron ja syövät sen sanoen: 'Me uskomme Esauun ja Jaakobisiin.' Onko tämä sinusta siivoa tai näennäistä vai ei?"

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1108: Vanhurskaan miehen kuoleman jälkeisestä tilasta, jota ei ole aloitettu. Jeesus sanoi: "Jos tällaisen aika päättyy pallon läpi, Bainchōōōchin vastaanottajat, joka on yksi kolmivoimaisia jumalia, tulevat hänen sielunsa perään ja johtavat sieluaan ilolla ja riemulla ja viettävät kolme päivää kiertäen sen kanssa ja opettaen sitä maailman luomuksista ilolla ja riemulla. "Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen Amenteen ja opettavat sitä Amenten kurituksen välineistä; mutta he eivät kosta sitä. Mutta he opettavat sitä vain heitä vastaan, ja kurinteiden liekin savu tarttuu siihen vain vähän. "Sen jälkeen he kantavat sen keskelle ja opettavat sitä keskuuden tapojen kurittelusta, liekin savusta, joka tarttuu siihen pikkasen.

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1110: "Sen jälkeen he johdattavat sen Valon Neitsyen luokse, ja hän tuomitsee sen ja tallettaa sen Pieni Sabaōth, Hyvä, hän keskeltä, kunnes pallo kääntyy itsestään, ja Zeus ja Afrodite tulevat Valon Neitsyen edestä, kun taas Kronos ja Arēs tulevat hänen takaataan. "Siihen aikaan hän ottaa sen vanhurskaan sielun ja ojentaa se hänen vastaanottajilleen, jotta he voivat heittää sen pallon pioneihin. Ja pallon orjuuttajat johdattavat sen veteen, joka on pallon alapuolella; ja siihen nousee tuli, kunnes se puhdistaa sen totaalisesti." 

xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1112: "Sen jälkeen tulee Yaluham, Sabaōthin sisäänheittäjä, Adamas, joka antaa sieluille unohduksen maljan, ja hän tuo unohduksen veden ja antaa sen sielulle; [ja se juo sitä] unohtaa kaiken ja kaikki alueet, joille se oli mennyt." Viisauden maljasta." Sen jälkeen tulee pienen Sabaōthin, Hyvän, ja Keskon vastaanottaja. Hän itse tuo kupin täynnä ajatuksia ja viisautta, ja siinä on raittiutta; [ja] hän antaa sen sielulle. Ja he heittävät sen ruumiiseen, joka ei voi nukkua eikä unohtaa sen raittiuden kupin takia, joka sille on annettu; mutta se piiskaa sinnikkäästi sydäntään kyseenalaistamaan Valon mysteereitä, kunnes se löytää ne Valon Neitsyen päätöksellä ja perii Valon ikuisesti." Niin ettei siinä kummemmin käy, ei satu sen vertaa kuin koronarokotus. Heippa, jatketaan tästä ensi kerralla. Jokos saadaan lounasta?

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 58: 	Il a en effet fabriqué un être artificiel de silicon et il attendait une occasion pour expérimenter son invention. Il lui propose donc d'adapter physiquement le prototype à son modèle feminin, tout en le rendant spirituellement bien supérieur. Car Il donne à l'être fabriqué l'âme" d'une jeune homme, c'est d'une grande perfection ainsi, plongée dans un sommeil hypnotique profond.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 60: 	Cette œuvre est notamment critiquée pour sa profonde misogynie. Tottakai. Setämies on ennustettavampi kuin toosaropotti. Why can't a woman be more like a man?

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 92: Peoni ja kafferi eivät ymmärtäisi La Jocondea. No en minäkään, sillä on päällä nihan liikaa kuteita. Se on suunnilleen yhtä sievä kuin Beforeignersin rasisti naispoliisi. Maailman tunnetuin maalaus esittää salaperäisesti hymyilevää naista.  Sillä oli todnäk yhtä huonot hampaat kuin Ingridin kamulla Maddella tms. josta tuli pyhän Olkkarin panopuu.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 117: The standard line is that the 'deus' is Octavian. Interpretations of the First Eclogue have now come full circle. Much significant scholarship has centered around the problems inherent in an identification of the deus with Octavian. Some critics maintain that the poem is Virgil's thank-offering to Octavian for protection from land confiscation; others, though fewer in number, are equally as insistent that the eclogue expresses the poet's disapproval of his government´s land policy. A recent attempt has been made to unite the basic arguments of both sides into a more balanced statement. According to this interpretation Octavian is regarded as "having wrought both good and evil" in the past, but Virgil succeeds in revealing him to be "a savior, a force for good, and a source of hope for the future." To the contrary, I propose that an even stronger case can, and ought, be made that, in the First Eclogue, Virgil not only condemns the government land policy, but he also adroitly queries the very structure of Octavian's political program and ethic during this period.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 162: Au IIIe siècle avant J-C, l’ingénieur grec Philon de Byzance classe les jardins suspendus de Babylone, au sud de l’actuel Irak, parmi les sept merveilles du monde antique. Le premier à les évoquer est le prêtre babylonien Bérose (IVe siècle avant J-C). Il attribue leur construction à Nabuchodonosor II, qui les aurait créés pour son épouse persane Amytis, laquelle se languissait de la verdure de son pays natal. Le texte de Bérose est perdu, mais il subsiste sous forme de fragments chez des historiens et géographes du Ier siècle avant J-C, tels Flavius Josèphe, Diodore de Sicile et Strabon ; on le retrouve également chez Eusèbe de Césarée (265-339 de l’ère chrétienne). Toutefois, à l’exception de Bérose, aucun texte babylonien ne mentionne les jardins suspendus, ou du moins pas un seul n’a été retrouvé. Aucune des inscriptions relatant les grands chantiers de Nabuchodonosor II ne contient une référence à un jardin surélevé. Dans ses Histoires, le géographe et historien grec Hérodote (480-425 avant notre ère), qui a visité Babylone un siècle seulement après la mort de Nabuchodonosor, ne les évoque pas non plus lorsqu’il décrit la ville. Les murailles, la tour de Babel ou Ziggurat d’Etemenanki, les palais royaux et autres constructions de la ville antique ont été identifiés par les fouilles archéologiques ou sont attestés dans les textes cunéiformes. Mais cela n’a pas été le cas pour les jardins.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 168: Noin vuonna 280 eaa. Berossos kirjoitti teoksen Babyloniaka tarkoituksenaan selittää Mesopotamian vanhaa kulttuuria kreikkalaisille. Varteenotettaviksi lähteiksi Berossoksen kirjoitukset tekee se, että hän toimi Marduk-jumalan pappina Babylonissa ollessaan. Finkelin mukaan hänellä oli tästä syystä ensi käden tietoa sumerilaisesta ja akkadilaisesta savitaulukirjallisuudesta, jota oli kirjoitettu silloin jo yli tuhannen vuoden ajan ja jota yhä kirjoitettiin Babylonin akatemioissa. Berossoksen oppineisuus ja ennustustaito tunnettiin myös Ateenassa. Koska kreikkalaiset kuitenkin pitivät muita kansoja barbaareina, kirjaa tuskin luettiin heidän keskuudessaan kovinkaan laajasti, eikä se ole säilynyt nykypäiviin. Sen sijaan toiset kirjoittajat ovat siteeranneet teosta, ja sitä kautta siitä on säilynyt joitakin osia, joista ilmenee niiden perustuvan pitkälti nuolenpääkirjoituksiin.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 173: Il nous eût été si agréable de posséder quelques bonnes épreuves photographiques, (prises au moment même du phénomène,) de Josué arrêtant le soleil, par exemple, ou ramassant la colline des 40K prepuces? ― de quelques Vues du Paradis terrestre prises de l’Entrée aux épées flamboyantes ; de l’Arbre de la Science ; du Serpent ; etc. : ― de quelques vues du Déluge, prises du sommet de l’Ararat (l’industrieux Japhet, aurait, je le parierais, emporté un objectif dans l’arche s’il eût connu ce merveilleux instrument). Plus tard, on eût cliché les Sept Plaies d’Égypte, le Buisson ardent, le Passage de la mer Rouge en video, avant, pendant, et après l’épisode, le Mané, Thécel, Pharès, du festin de Balthazar ; le bûcher d’Assur-banipal, le Labarum, la Tête de Méduse, le Minotaure, etc., ― et nous jouirions, aujourd’hui, des portraits-cartes de Prométhée, des Stymphalides, des Sybilles, des Danaïdes, des Furies, etc., etc.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 188:     Quant aux mystiques, je puis leur soumettre une réflexion naïve, paradoxale, superficielle, s’ils veulent, mais singulière : ― N’est-il pas attristant de penser que si Dieu, le Très-Haut, le bon Dieu, dis-je, enfin le Tout-Puissant, (lequel, de notoriété publique, est apparu à tant de gens, qui l’ont affirmé, depuis les vieux siècles, ― nul ne saurait le contester sans hérésie ― et dont tant de mauvais peintres et de sculpteurs médiocres s’évertuent à vulgariser de chic les prétendus traits) ― oui, penser que s’Il daignait nous laisser prendre la moindre, la plus humble photographie de Lui, voire me permettre, à moi, Thomas Alva Edison, ingénieur américain, sa créature, de clicher une simple épreuve videographique de Sa vraie Nez et Voix (car le tonnerre a bien mué, depuis Franklin), dès le lendemain il n’y aurait plus un seul athée sur la terre !

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 286:     Ca va jusqu’à balayer la différence entre l’être humain et les autres animaux en faisant éclore subitement une position symétrique d’observation!  Mais de notre côté, nous (ou moi, je suis seule a ecrire ceci) n’y voyons pas la même démonstration.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 310:     Enfin, puisque vous le désirez, voici : ― j’ai le malheur de subir un amour très pénible, le premier de ma vie (et, dans ma famille, le premier est presque toujours le dernier, c’est-à-dire le seul) pour une très-belle personne ― tenez ! pour la plus belle personne du monde, je crois ! ― et qui est, actuellement à New York, au théâtre, dans notre loge, où elle fait miroiter les pierres de ses oreilles en paraissant écouter le Freyschütz. ― Là !… Vous voilà satisfait, j’imagine, monsieur le curieux ?

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 387: Tää on siis koe. Jos tästä sielun kurjuudesta huolimatta, jonka kurjuutta teeskentelen ilman myönnytyksiä tai sääliä, hän kuitenkin jatkaa edelleen ja haluaa mut rakastajattarexi, niin hän ei ole arvokkaampi minulle kuin joku toinen, enkä edusta hänen intohimolleen muuta kuin sitä yhtä paikkaa, vain summaa nautinnoista, juomaa, joka on samanlainen kuin skottiviski; notta lopulta hän nauraisi todellisuudelleni, jos hän voisi aistia sen.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 407: Hän ei koskaan epäillyt todellisen raivon kuljetuksia, joilla häntä kesytän kun ajelutan edestakaisin paisuvaista hänessä. Kuinka monta kertaa olen kuivannut hänet ja itsenikin jälkeenpäin!  En ole laskenut. Kielletty myönnytys, kangastus! ovat siksi orjuuttaneet minut tähän ihmeelliseen pystypäiseen asentoon! Neiti Alicia merkitsee minulle nyt vain hyvänolon koloa, ja vannon Jumalan nimeen, että hänen omistuxeensa joutuminen olisi minulle mahootointa. Se olis melkein yhtä paha kuin jos Koko Suomi leipoo ohjelman osanottajat ei edes tapais Minttu Räikköstä, rallikuskin vaimoa!

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 484: Fausses entre elle-même et notre chant crédule ; 


xxx/ellauri173.html on line 488: Une sonore, vaine et monotone ligne.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 514: » Où notre ébat au jour consumé soit pareil. 


xxx/ellauri173.html on line 539: Et notre sang, épris de qui le va saisir, 


xxx/ellauri173.html on line 599: näkyvän ja tyynen huokauxen, keinotekoisen 
                

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 721:     Nyt, kuten kaikki keskinkertaiset olennot, neiti Alicia ei suinkaan ole tyhmä, vaan on vain typerä. ― Hänen unelmansa olisi näyttää kaikille "älykkäältä naiselta!" "hohtavien" ulkokuorien, sen tarjoamien etujen vuoksi. Tämä fantastinen porvaristo rakastaisi tätä naamiota vessaksi, miellyttäväksi ajanvietteeksi, mutta ei kuitenkaan kovin vakavaksi. Jotta hän löytää tavan pysyä keskinkertaisena, jopa tässä kuivassa ja sairaassa ihanteessa.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 723:     ― Millaista typeryyttä hänellä on arkielämässä? kysyi Edison. "Häneen on tarttunut  ", vastasi lordi Ewald, "se niin sanottu negatiivinen, naurettava järki, joka yksinkertaisesti rajaa kaiken ja jonka havainnot liittyvät vain merkityksettömiin arkipäiväisyyxiin, joiden intohimoiset kannattajat painokkaasti kutsuvat asioita "jalat maassa" nimellä. Ikään kuin nämä tylsät asiat, jotka olisi sovittava mahdollisimman hiljaa, imisivät tässä vaiheessa kaikki huolet todellisten elävien keskuudessa!

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 747:     "Kuinka hän voi olla, kun hän on typerys! Ihminen on hyvä vain, kun on tyhmä, sanoo lordi Ewald. - Vai niin ! Olisi edes rikollinen, ilkeä, tumma, Rooman keisarinna, niin olisin ymmärtänyt hänet! ja tuhat kertaa suosikki! Mutta ei siinä kaikki että hän ei ole hyvä, hänellä ei ole sitä villiä ruokahalua, joka syntyy  voimakkaasta ylpeydestä. Hyvä ! sinä sanot? Hänessä ei ole jälkeäkään siitä ylivoimaisuudesta joka muuttaa rumuuden ja levittää lumottua balsamiaan jokaiseen haavaan! Pyh, hän ei ole edes kunnolla paha!

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 749: Ei. Keskinkertainen ennen kaikkea, hän ei ole edes ilkeä: hän on hyväluontoinen, koska hän on ennemmin ahne kuin kurja: aina typerästi, ei koskaan tyhmästi. Hänellä on heikkojen ja kuivien sydämien tekopyhyys, kuin kuollut puu, jotka eivät lyhyesti sanottuna ole sen arvoisempia palvelemaan kuin saamaan palveluja.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 802:       "Voiko ainoastaan animoitua olentoa rakastaa!" kysyi lordi Ewald. - Hyvin ! sanoi Edison. "Sielu on tuntematon; animoitko Hadalysi? Tietääkö hän, kuka hän on?" mikä hän on, tarkoitan? "Tiedämmekö me itse niin hyvin, keitä olemme?" ja mitä me olemme? ("Ettekö tiedä kuka minä olen? Minä olen kiro- en minä jaxa.") . "Kysyn, onko olennollasi tunnetta itsestään. - Epäilemättä ! vastasi Edison hyvin hämmästyneenä kysymyksestä. - Eh? Sanotko?… huudahti lordi Ewald hämmästyneenä. Vitun ääliöt. Pohtivat taas tota tietoisuuden VAIKEAA kysymystä. 

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 833:       ― Täällä, minä tarjoan sinulle elämää taas, ― mutta millä hinnalla kenties! Kuka sen nyt voisi arvioida? "Ihante valehteli sinulle?" Onko "Totuus" tuhonnut halusi? Nainen jäädytti aistisi? "Hyvästi niin sanotulle Todellisuudelle, muinaiselle pettäjälle! Tarjoan sinulle, minä, tilaisuuden kokeillaa Keinotekoista ja sen uusia yllytyksiä!…

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 882:       - Vai niin ! elävä taideteos, vaippojamme lukuunottamatta, hänellä ei ole käyttöä terveyssiteille. ― Katso: Androidin mukana on vakiovarusteena raskas eebenpuuarkku, joka on pehmustettu mustalla satiinilla. Tämän symbolisen kotelon sisäpuoli on täsmälleen se naismuodon muotti, joka sen on tarkoitus ottaa. Tämä on hänen myötäjäiset. Ylälehdet avataan pienellä tähtimäisellä kultaavaimella, jonka lukko on sijoitettu yöpöydän alle. Eiku sinne vaan köyrimään. Muista kääntää äänet päälle on/off nappulasta.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 886:       Kun neiti Alicia Clary vastaanottaa sun jäähyväiset, olet Athelwoldin linnassasi, jossa voit herättää hänen varjonsa... taivaallisen. ― Kartanossani?... ― Kyllä, muuten, se on täysin mahdollista! " mutisi lordi Ewald ikään kuin itselleen, täysin kauhean melankolian vallassa.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 895:       "Kyllä: tämä kartano on mielestäni paras ympäristö androidille", sanoi Edison vakavasti. ― Näet sen: vaikka en olekaan luonteeltani kovin urhea, assosioidun rohkeuteenne, joka on lisäksi minulle pyhää. ― Vain siellä Hadaly on kuin salaperäinen somnambulisti, joka vaeltelee järvien ympärillä tai kielletyllä kanervalla. Tässä autiossa vankityrmässä, jossa vanhat palvelijasi, kirjasi, metsästyksesi, soittimesi odottavat sinua, olennot ja esineet tottuvat nopeasti uuteen tulokkaaseen. ― Ehkä jonain päivänä tulen luoksesi tässä puoliyksinäisyydessä, jossa suostut ikuisesti kipuamaan kahta suurta vaaraa: hulluutta ja Jumalaa. Voisin jopa ottaa tyypit silikoninukesta ellet pahastu.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 925:     ”Hänen omatuntonsa, sanotko sinä?… Mutta meillä miekkosilla, tämä Pyhän Hengen lahja, Omatunto, muuttuu ennen kaikkea kyvyksi älylliseen ystävyyteen. Jokainen nuori mies, joka ei muinaisten tasavaltojen päivinä kyennyt 20-vuotiaana saamaan ystäväänsä suoristumaan, julistettiin tunnottomaxi, sanalla sanoen pahamaineiseksi. Historiassa on mainittu tuhat esimerkkiä ihailtavista ystävistä: Damon ja Pythias, Pylades ja Orestes, Akhilleus ja Patroklus, David ja Jonatan, Dupont ja Dupond, Henry Higgins ja Colonel Pickering, Tiku ja Taku, jne. 2-neuvoisia etanoita 2 hengen junissa tuntosarvet ulkona. Nimeä kaksi naisystävää koko ihmiskunnan historian aikana? Ruth ja Naomi. Sappho and her friend. Maria ja Elisabeth. Katri Vala ja Elina Vaara. Elizabeth Bennett ja Charlotte Collins. Jane Austin ja Cassandra. Tove ja Tuutikki. No joo mut silti vittu oikeesti.  Mahdoton juttu. Miksi ? ― Koska nainen tunnistaa itsensä liian tajuttomasti lähilontossaan, jolta se ei koskaan tule huijatuksi. Miehet taas kusettaa ja tulee kustux silmään ihan sikana kun ne on niin tolloja - no en viizi jatkaa tästä aiheesta.

xxx/ellauri173.html on line 927:     ― Riittää, kun huomaa tarkata katsetta, jolla moderni nainen kääntyy ympärilleen, katsoo ohikulkijattaren pukua, niin on siitä ikuisesti vakuuttunut. ”Koska hänessä, intohimoisesta näkökulmasta katsottuna, turhuuksien turhuus hallitsee tai tikistää parempia motiiveja ja koska rakastus on (kaikista vastalauseista huolimatta) hänelle lähes aina vain toissijaista. Olla vain suositeltavampi, se on kaikki mitä hän haluaa. Tämä on tämän sfinksin ainut sana. Valize minut, arvaa tai syön sinut. Tästä syystä jokainen meidän sivistynyt kaunottaremme, harvoja poikkeuksia lukuun ottamatta, aina jossain määrin halveksii häntä, joka rakastaa hiäntä, koska jälkimmäinen on jo yksin syyllinen siihen korvaamattomaan rikokseen, ettei hän enää vertaa hiäntä muihin. Nuuskii vaan muita hameenalusia. Kun taas Don Juan ja Casanova, Byron, Goethe, Bellow, Roth - no riittäköön tästä aiheesta. You get the point.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 63:     Malebranche was giving in to laws of cause an effect by placing a greater emphasis than he had previously done on his occasionalist account of causation, and particularly on his contention that God acted for the most part through "general volitions" and only rarely, as in the case of miracles, through "particular volitions". A bitter dispute ensued between Malebranche and his fellow Cartesian, Arnauld, whose name I remember from Chomsky's airy forays to Port-Royal grammar in the 60's. Over the next few years, the two men wrote enough polemics against one another to fill four volumes of Malebranche's collected works and three of Arnauld's. Arnauld's supporters managed to persuade the Roman Catholic Church to place Nature and Grace on its Index of Prohibited Books in 1690, and it was followed there by the Search nineteen years later in 1709. (Ironically, the Index already contained several works by the Jansenist Arnauld himself.) Somebody blamed Malebranche for being a Spinozan, which Nick himself vehemently demented. 1715 - Malebranche dies.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 87: Tossa okkasionalismissa on musta sikäli vinha perä, että vaikka kaikki onkin lähes determinististä (kvantteja lukuunottamatta), niin yhtä determinististä on se että porukat pelaa pelejä tietämättä ollenkaan kuka tulee voittamaan, ja sixi ne yrittää hampaat irvessä. Ja vaikka tosiseikka on, että enimmäxeen isommat, vahvemmat ja ilkeämmät voittavat, niin ei aina, ja sixi nyhverötkin yrittävät. Se että ne päättelevät näin ja koittavat sixi seppoilla huoollakin menestyxellä, on sekin determinististä, mutta lopputulos ei välttämättä ole ennustettava. Sillä ennustettavuus on eri asia kuin determinismi. Determinististä se on kaaoskin. 

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 104: Täällä hän laulaa: voit koskettaa häntä. Sen varsi eristää sen; se on karkaistu lasiputki; malja, jossa näet tämän hehkun värisevän, muodostaa itse lauhduttimen; se on keinotekoinen orkidea, melko hyvin jäljitelty... loistavampi kuin kaikki ne, jotka tuoksuvat auringonnousun valohöyryihin Brasilian ja Ylä-Perun tasangoilla. Ize asiassa luonnon jutut ovat aivan perseestä, verrattuina näihin muovisiin. Kuten tulet kohta näkemään!   

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 106: Näin sanoen Edison sytytti sikarinsa vaaleanpunaisen kamelian tulisessa sydämessä. - Mitä ! Onko todellakin tämä satakieli, jonka sielun kuulen, kuollut? mutisi lordi Ewald. - Kuollut! sinä sanot? "Ei aivan... koska ammuin sen sielun", sanoi Edison. Herättelen sen sähköllä: se on vakavaa spiritualismia. Eh ? "Ja ilmaus siitä, että neste on täällä enää muuta kuin kaloria, voit sytyttää sikarisi tällä vaarattomalla kipinällä, tässä samassa hajustetussa valekukassa, jossa tämän linnun sielu laulaa, melodinen valo. Voit sytyttää sikarisi tämän satakielisen sielussa. Ja sähköasentaja käveli pois painaakseen useita numeroituja kristallipainikkeita pienessä kehyksessä, joka oli kiinnitetty seinään ovea vasten.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 113:     Hän asetti tarjottimen credenzalle, kaatoi vanhaa espanjalaista viiniä ylhäältä ja otti sitten kaksi lasillista kuohuviiniä käsiinsä ja tuli tarjoamaan niitä vierailijoilleen. - Ei ei Hadaly, komento takaisin, sherryä! I said order lunch, not launch! SORRY. Sitten hän meni täyttämään viimeisen lasin ja kääntyi pois viehättävällä liikkeellä. Hän nojasi yhtä maanalaista pylvästä vasten ja kohotti kätensä suoraan verhotun päänsä yläpuolelle ja sanoi melankolisella äänellään: "Herra, rakkaillesi!

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 122: Lordi Ewald kumarsi hieman: sitten kuin mies, jota janottaa, joi lasin sherryä, laittoi sen tyhjäksi pöydälle, heitti sammuneen sikarinsa alas, otti laatikosta uuden. Hadalyn tarjottimelta, valaisi sen rauhallisesti kirkkaaksi kukkaksi Edisonin esimerkin mukaisesti - sitten istuutui yhdelle jakkaralle norsunluusta ja odotti, että toinen tai toinen - isäntä tai emäntä - olivat valmiita vaivautumaan selvittämään asiaa. Mutta Hadaly oli jälleen kerran nojautunut mustaan pianoonsa ja off-asennossa.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 146:     ― Nyt, lisäsi sähköasentaja, aiomme, koska haluatte, tutkia vakavasti uuden, sähkö-ihmisolennon eliötä, - tämän tulevan Eevan eliötä, vihdoinkin, jonka keinotekoisen lisääntymisen avulla (jo melko muodissa viime aikoina), minusta täytyy näyttää täyttävän lajimme salaiset toiveet ennen vuosisataa – ainakin aloitteentekijäkansojen keskuudessa. Vizi täähän ei ole muuta kuin transhumanismia parisataa vuotta ennen aikojaan. Näitä hulluja on piisannut, ja piisaa nyttekin, kiitos mulkeroiden kuten Harari, Larry Page ja Gates.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 237: Itse asiassa tällaiset feminiiniset olennot – toisin sanoen ne, jotka ovat alentavia ja kohtalokkaita vain harvinaisen ja rehellisen luonteen miehille – tietävät vaistomaisesti, kuinka kekseliäimmällä tavalla antaa tälle rakastajalle kaikkien tyhjyytensä löydöt: yksinkertaiset ohikulkijat, joilla ei ole edes aikaa havaita lukumääräänsä ja vakavuuttaan. - He tottelevat hänen näkemyksensä huomaamattomilla sävyasteikoilla suloiseen valoon, joka turmelee moraalista ja fyysistä verkkokalvoa. Heillä on tämä salainen ominaisuus, että he voivat vahvistaa jokaisen rumuutensa niin tahdikkuudella, että niistä tulee etuja. Ja he päätyvät huomaamattomasti siirtämään (usein kauhean) todellisuutensa alkuperäiseen (usein viehättävään) visioon, jonka he antoivat siitä. Tapa tulee, kaikkine verhoineen; se heittää sumunsa; illuusio pahenee: ― ja loitsusta tulee korjaamaton.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 241: Tämänkaltaiset olennot tietävät vain sen, voivat vain sen, ymmärtää vain sen. He ovat vieraita kaikelle muulle – mikä ei heitä kiinnosta. Se on puhdasta eläimellisyyttä. Ne ovat ELÄIMIÄ! Mutta eläimistä liskoeläimet juuri pitävät.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 260: Nämä pahoinpitelyolennot, Ihmiselle, nämä pahojen halujen herättäjät, nämä turhien ilojen alullepanijat, voivat lipsua huomaamatta ja jopa jättäen miellyttävän muiston tuhansien huolettomien matkustajien käsivarsien väliin, joiden mielijohteesta on kysymys. ovat kauheita vain niille, jotka viipyvät siellä, yksinomaan, kunnes supistuu hänen sydämessään alhainen tarve heidän syleilystään.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 268: Yksin he suunnittelevat koko projektinsa. Ne tarjoavat aluksi, kuin mitätön omena, tuntemattoman nautinnon vaikutelman - jo häpeällistä kuitenkin! ― ja tuo Mies syvällä sisimmässään vain suostuu sitoutumaan heikolla ja huolestuneella hymyllä ja etukäteen katumuksella. Kuinka uhmata itseään ehdottomasti - niin vähällä! ― näistä iloisista mutta inhottavista ystävistä, jotka ovat jokaiselle, yksi, jota ei saa tavata! Heidän protestinsa ja rukouksensa, ― niin hienovaraisia, niin taiteellisia, ettei heidän ammattiaan enää eroteta ― pakottavat hänet melkein... (ah! sanon melkein! ― kaikki on tässä sanassa, minulle!) ― s istumaan heidän kanssaan tässä pöydässä, jossa pian heidän pahan olemuksensa demoni pakottaa heidät, jos niin on sanottava, myös he maksamaan tälle miehelle vain myrkkyä. Siitä eteenpäin se on tehty: työ on alkanut: tauti kulkee kulkuaan. Vain Jumala voi pelastaa hänet. Ihmeen kautta.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 274: Näin ollen, kun otetaan huomioon, että – tiettyjen petollisten keinojen käyttöönoton ansiosta – jos yksi näistä naisista, hyödyntäen yhtä niistä vaarallisista sairaalloisen heikkouden hetkestä, jolloin kaikki elävät olennot, jopa miehisetkin, voivat joutua puolustuskyvyttömiksi, pystyi pitkällä aikavälillä siis intohimoiseen sokeuteen asti komea, nuori, rohkea mies, joka on tunnollinen velvollisuuksistaan, ansainnut omaisuutensa, jolla on korkea älykkyys ja alkuarvo, joka on tähän asti moitteeton, - kyllä, Vakuutan, että minusta on reilua kieltää tältä naiselta vapaa oikeus käyttää hyväksi inhimillistä kurjuutta siihen pisteeseen, että hän johdatti tämän miehen tietoisesti tai ei, minne se helvetin hyppääjä, josta puhun, ajoi ystäväni.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 284: Niin sanotut modernit mielet, toisin sanoen itsekkyyden skeptisimmän tahraama, kirjoittaisivat itsekseen minua kuunnellessaan:

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 294: Jos jotkut näyttävät ensi silmäyksellä kauniilta, vakuutan, että heidän kasvojensa tai heidän ruumiinsa on ehdottomasti tarjottava joitain surullisen kuuluisia, ala-arvoisia piirteitä, jotka vääristävät loput ja joihin heidän olemuksensa käännetään: elämä ja ylilyönnit vahvistavat pian näitä epämuodostumia. - Ja nyt on sanottava, että kun otetaan huomioon heidän sytyttämä intohimonsa, kun tämänkaltaisen intohimon on saatava aikaan nämä synkät seuraukset, se ei suinkaan johdu heidän harhaanjohtavasta kauneudesta heidän vahingollinen voimansa rakastajaansa kohtaan! mutta monet näistä vain vastenmielisistä piirteistä, jotka vain saavat tämän rakastajan sietämään sitä pientä tavanomaista kauneutta, jota he häpäisevät. Voiko ohikulkija haluta näille naisille tätä kauneutta: heidän rakastajaansa? ei koskaan.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 300: Sillä heidän persoonansa kauneudesta ei kestä kauan tulla laaduksi, joka on useimmiten keinotekoista ja sillä välin hyvin keinotekoista. Tietysti sitä on vaikea tunnistaa yhdellä silmäyksellä: mutta se on. "Mitä väliä sillä on (huudahtavat filosofimme), jos kokonaisuus tekee miellyttävän vaikutelman? Ovatko ne meille muuta kuin kauniit hetket, jotka kuluvat? Jos heidän persoonansa maku näillä uusilla ainesosilla ja lisäyksillä maustettuna ei miellytä meitä, niin mitä väliä sillä on, miten he valmistavat tuoksuttelemansa hyvänmakuisen aterian! »

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 302: Luulen, että todistan sinulle pian, että tällä on vähän enemmän merkitystä kuin nämä huolimattomat amatöörit luulevat. "Sitten, jos katsomme oppilaiden läpi näitä epäilyttäviä teini-ikäisiä tyttöjä (niin kauniita!), voimme erottaa näissä pupillissa niitä vartioivan siveetöntä kissan välähdyksen, ja tämä havainto tulee välittömästi ristiriidassa keinotekoisen raakuusuuden kanssa. nuoret voivat tarjota heille charmia.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 308: Jotain hämmentävää järkeä, aksiooma, joka syntyy näistä feminiinisistä ryhmistä, jotka kävelevät käsi kädessä miehen kanssa, on se, että heidän kohtalokas ja sairaalloinen toimintansa uhria kohtaan on suoraan verrannollinen keinotekoisuuden määrään, moraaliseen ja fyysiseen. , josta he korostavat, ― joista he pikemminkin hylkäävät ― ne harvat luonnolliset viettelyt, joita heillä näyttävät olevan.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 442: Alva latoo lisää perusteluja mixi silikoninukke on enemmän kuin riittävä. - Rakastunut ? Ah! Jos kaksi rakastajaa voisi koskaan todella nähdä toisensa sellaisena kuin he ovat ja todella tietäisi mitä he ajattelevat ja miten he ajattelevat toisistaan, heidän intohimonsa katoaisi minuutilta! Totta kyllä että ruumiikkaiden ihratynnörien punnerrus ja äherrys pukilla voisi niitä videona izeäänkin ällöttää. Se on hyvin harhaanjohtavaa, sanoi nuori mies surullisesti. Mutta… aina kuulla samat sanat! nähdä partneri aina saman ilmeen mukana, vaikka kuinka ihailtavan! ― Luulen, että tämä komedia näyttää pian… yksitoikkoiselta. "Termennän", vastasi Edison, "että kahden toisiaan rakastavan olennon välillä mikä tahansa uutuus ulkonäössä voi johtaa vain arvovallan heikkenemiseen, intohimon muuttamiseen ja unelmien lentämiseen. Tästä johtuu rakastajien nopea kylläisyys, kun he havaitsevat tai uskovat havaitsevansa pitkällä aikavälillä todellisen vastavuoroisen luonteensa, joka on vapautettu keinotekoisista verhoista, joilla kukin heistä koristaa itsensä miellyttääkseen toistaan. Se on jopa vain ero heidän unelmaansa, jonka he edelleen näkevät täällä! Ja se riittää, että he usein alkavat kokea inhoa   ja vihaa."

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 475: Mitä haluat meidän improvisoivan, valitettavasti! jota ei ole jo veloitettu miljardien suuhun? Katkaisemme, säädämme, vähättelemme, änkämme, siinä kaikki. Kannattaako tulla katumaan, tulla sanotuksi, tulla kuulluksi? Eikö Kuolema, kourallinen maata, lopeta huomenna kaiken tämän merkityksettömän puheen, kaiken tämän hakkeroituneen puheen, jossa levitämme itseämme uskoen "improvisoivamme"?  

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 477:   Akulla on sanottavaa aforistiikasta kuin Hannu Karpolla. Ize se ei ole juuri lyhyen muodon mestari, enempi toisto tyylikeinona:

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 479:   Ja kuinka epäröisit pitää parempana ajan säästönä ihailtavia sanatiivisteitä (töräyxiä eli aforismeja), joiden muodostavat ne, joilla on puhetaito, ajattelutapa ja jotka voivat ilmaista yksinään koko ihmiskunnan tuntemuksia! Nämä maailmanmiehet ovat analysoineet intohimoiden hienovaraisimmat vivahteet. Se on olemus, jonka he yksin ovat säilyttäneet, jonka he ilmaisevat tiivistämällä tuhansia niteitä yhdelle sivulle. He olemme me, keitä tahansa olemme. He ovat Proteuksen jumalan inkarnaatioita, joka valvoo sydämiämme. Kaikki ajatuksemme, sanamme, tunteemme, karaatin painottuna, ovat heidän mielessään merkittyjä kaukaisimpiin seurauksiinsa, joihin emme uskalla mennä, uskaltakaa! He tietävät etukäteen ja parhaansa mukaan kaiken, mitä intohimomme voivat ehdottaa meille voimakkuutta, taikuutta ja ihanteita. Emme pysty parempaan, vakuutan teille: - enkä ymmärrä miksi meidän pitäisi vaivautua puhumaan huonommin, koska haluamme luottaa epäpätevyyteemme, sillä verukkeella, että se on ainakin henkilökohtaista - sitten se tämä, näet, on edelleen vain illuusio. 

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 483:   Katso: Idolilla on hopeiset jalat, kuin kaunis yö. Heidän maneerinsa odottaa vain lumista verinahkaa, malleolien uudelleenkasvua, vaaleanpunaisia kynsiä ja niiden suonet, eikö niin? kauniista laulajastasi. Vain, jos ne vaikuttavat kevyiltä lähestymistavaltaan, ne ovat vähemmän sellaisia todellisuudessa. Niiden sisäinen täyteläisyys saavutetaan elohopean raskaalla juoksevuudella. Tämä hermeettinen platinapaita, joka jatkaa niitä, on täytetty nestemäisellä metallilla ja kohoaa kaventuen "vasikan syntymäpaikkaan" asti, niin että kaikki paino kantaa itse jalkaa. Lyhyesti sanottuna ne ovat kaksi 50 kiloa pientä saapasta ja niiden kapina on kuitenkin melkein lapsellinen. Ne näyttävät kevyiltä kuin lintu, niin paljon voimakkaasta sähkömagneettista, joka inspiroi heitä ja joka elävöittää näiden kahden tulevaisuuden täydellisyyden leikkimistä.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 490: Lerputettuaan taas kraanan alla Alva jatkaa: Tulet yllättymään niiden viehätysvoiman identiteetistä, jonka he hajottavat asenteisiin! Jos epäilet, että naisellinen "armo" johtuu niin vähäisestä, tarkastele neiti Alicia Claryn korsettia: ja näe askeleen ero, kehon linjassa, vihdoinkin ilman tätä keinotekoista ohjetta! "Katso, kaikissa nivelissä, erityisesti käsivarsissa, on niitä epätasa-arvoisia joustavuutta, joiden loputon luopuminen maksoi minulle pitkiä valppauksia. Mutta kivaa se oli sittenkin!

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 597:   Koneoppiminen, sitä ei sentään Aatami kexinyt, kaunis naama tehään taiteilijan avulla käsipelillä. Sit viä niin sanotusti hänen läsnäolonsa hieno tunnelma, italialaisen runouden "tuoksu di femina". Loppupeleissä jokaisella naisellisella paikalla on ominainen tuoksunsa. On ennen kaikkea kysymys lihan hajun monimutkaisuuden hallinnasta sen kemiallisessa todellisuudessa. Sitä varten kerätään Aliciasta hikeä ja muita eritteitä.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 612: Sir William Crookes (17. kesäkuuta 1832 – 4. huhtikuuta 1919) oli englantilainen fyysikko ja kemisti. Crookes oli lähtöisin alkujaan köyhästä perheestä. Hänen isänsä Joseph oli uransa alussa räätälin apulainen, mutta vaurastui myöhemmin. Nuori Crookes pääsi Royal College of Chemistry -yliopistoon ennen 16. syntymäpäiväänsä vuonna 1848. Crookes löysi alkuaine talliumin vuonna 1861. Tallium on rotanmyrkky jolla voi poistaa ihokarvoja. Kemiallisten tutkimustensa ohessa hän keksi Crookesin radiometrin eli niin sanotun valomyllyn vuonna 1873. Kehittämiensä tyhjiöputkien avulla hän myös havaitsi katodisäteet tutkiessaan sähkön johtumista harvassa kaasussa. Crookes oli tyhjiöputkitutkimuksen pioneereja ja vuonna 1879 hän havaitsi ensimmäisenä, että aine voi esiintyä plasmana. Crookes tuli tunnetuksi myös Daniel Dunglas Homen ja muiden meedioiden väitettyjen paranormaalien kykyjen testaajana ja hänellä oli hyvin myönteinen suhtautuminen spiritualismiin. 

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 618: - Hyvin! Eli mitä mieltä olisit tällaisesta ilmiöstä, jos saisit pohtia sen pelottavaa suoritusta? lopetti Edison. - Vai niin! Andrei vastasi syvällä äänellään ja sai paratiisin linnun nousemaan hopeisilla sormillaan: "Uskon, että tämä tapahtuma menisi ohi väistämättömässä Äärettömässä ilman, että sille annettaisiin paljon suurempaa merkitystä kuin sinä annat miljoonille kipinöille jokka putoaa takaisin talonpojan tulisijaan. Lordi Ewald katsoi Andreita lausumatta sanaakaan, edes "tervetuloa länteen Andrei". "Näezen", sanoi Edison palaten hänen luokseen. "Hadaly näyttää ymmärtävän tiettyjä käsitteitä yhtä hyvin kuin sinä ja minä; mutta hän kääntää ne vain niin sanotusti ainutlaatuisella vaikutelmalla, jonka hänen sanansa jättävät niistä mieleen kuvien avulla. Hetken päästä: "Lakkaudun arvaamasta, mitä ympärilläni tapahtuu, rakas velho", sanoi lordi Ewald, "ja jätän sen kokonaan sinun huoleksesi. "Joten tässä ovat Silmät!" sanoi sähköasentaja ja painoi jousta laatikossa.

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 653: "Mutta – nämä ovat sanoja, joihin olet menettänyt oikeuden lausua. Koska kattilasta nousevan savun vuoksi olet kieltänyt kaikki uskomukset, jotka niin monet miljoonat sankarit, ajattelijat ja marttyyrit olivat testamentanneet sinulle yli kuuden tuhannen vuoden ajan, te, jotka olette vain peräisin ikuisesta huomisesta, jonka aurinko voi hyvin olla että ei nousekaan (Hume). Mihin pidit tuskin eilisestä lähtien parempana edeltäjiesi niin sanottuja muuttumattomia periaatteita planeetalla, kuninkaat, jumalat, perheet, isänmaat? Tälle pienelle savulle, joka ne viheltää ja hajottaa ne tuulen mukaan, kaikkiin maan uriin, kaikkien meren aaltojen väliin! Kahdessakymmenessä viidessä vuodessa viisisataatuhatta veturihengitystä ovat riittäneet upottamaan "valaistuneet sielusi" syvimpään epäilyyn kaikesta siitä, mikä oli ihmiskunnan yli kuuden tuhannen vuoden uskoa.  

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 661:   ― Lyhyesti sanottuna (no vähän lyhyemmin ainakin), minä "Menlo Parkin velho", kuten minua tässä alla kutsutaan, tulen tarjoamaan ihmisille näitä kehittyneitä ja uusia aikoja, - vihdoinkin aktualismin tovereilleni! - suosia vastedes väärää, keskinkertaista ja aina muuttuvaa Todellisuutta, positiivista, arvostettua ja aina uskollista illuusiota. Kimeeri kimeeristä, synti synnistä, savu savusta, - miksi ei?... Vannon tässä, että 21 päivän kuluttua Hadaly pystyy haastamaan koko ihmiskunnan vastaamaan tähän kysymykseen selkeästi, rakas herrani. Sillä, koska kielsimme, sanomme: - ikuisen hyvinvoinnin, niin sanotun aina tulevan oikeudenmukaisuuden ja ikuisen ylpeyden savun vuoksi, hän, niukka ja lapsellinen, - mitä kutsuttiin, aina, ennen tätä syksyä, kipua, nöyryyttä, rakkautta, uskoa, rukousta, ihannetta - ja olennaista toivoa yhden päivän aurinkojemme takana - en näe tuskin, myönnän, minkä pirullisen muut periaatteet olisivat nykyaikaisia. ihminen uskaltaa nauramatta esittää hänelle loogisen tai jopa hyväksyttävän "vastalauseen".

xxx/ellauri174.html on line 665:   Yhtäkkiä pilarin sisältä soi kello. Se oli kutsu maasta. Hadaly nousi hitaasti ja hieman unisena. "Tässä on elävä kaunotar, herra Celian! hän sanoo. Hän saapuu Menlo Parkiin. Edison katsoi lordi Ewaldia kysyvästi. – Hyvästi, Hadaly! sanoi nuori mies vakavasti hetken kuluttua. Sähköasentaja tuli kättelemään häiritsevää luomustaan. Nähdään huomenna Life! hän sanoi hiänelle. Pannaas nallepuvut päälle, ja sitten hissiin. 

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 64: 기분 따라 느낌 따라, why not? Do it (do it)

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 77: I'm not a bad girl 더 완벽히 (yeah)

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 93: 기분 따라 느낌 따라, why not? Do it (do it)

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 99: Yeah, yeah, why not? (꿈만 같지?)

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 104: Why not? Do it

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 156: Mutta nuori lordi, kuin mies, joka tietää tarkalleen, mitä ympärillään sanotaan, oli pysynyt välinpitämättömänä. "Totisesti, neiti Alicia Clary, peläten sanoneensa jotain vähäpätöistä "taiteilijoiden" edessä, ryntäsi lisäämään hymyillen, jonka nokkeluus, ainakin tarkoitettu, antoi pyhäinhäväistävän koomisen ilmeen hänen kasvoilleen:

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 177: "Muuten, neiti Alicia Clary", hän sanoi, "no? mitä sanot rakkaasta teatteristamme täällä? sarjoistamme, laulajistamme? Ne ovat hyviä, eikö? "Yksi tai kaksi, melko herkullista, kyllä, jos haluat?" ― mutta… tyhmiä!

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 181: - Sinä sanot ? kysyi neiti Alicia. "Minä sanon: ah! ero! ero! Siinä kaikki elämässä! - Vai niin ! kyllä, ero! sanoi nuori nainen nostaen syvät silmänsä kuin itäinen taivas laboratorion säteitä kohti: Minusta tuntuu, että minun olisi mahdotonta rakastaa jotakuta, joka ei olisi eronnut.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 186: – Kyllä, eikö niin? jatkoi Edison (kohottaen kulmakarvojaan ja silmät tyhjänä), hieman…  (Sana "homo" leijuu lausumattomana ilmassa, mutta ei sanota.)

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 263: - On sanottu. Ja koska aika on kultaa, kun harjoittelemme muutamia kohtauksia näistä uuden järjestyksen dramaattisista tuotannoista, joiden mysteereitä tutkimme yhdessä, ― (anteeksi: tämä valkoinen aura, jos hän saa armon?) ― Rouva Any Sowana ryhtyy töihin neuvojeni avulla ja mahdollisimman pian. Joten kolmen viikon kuluttua... Katso, toimiiko hän nopeasti!

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 270: "Evessä, sanotko monsieur Thomasin luona?" ― Onko tämä rooli uudessa ohjelmistossa?

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 321: Tietysti me molemmat tiedämme liiankin hyvin, että lajissamme valitut olennot ovat harvassa ja että loppujen lopuksi tämä henkilö, ilman hänen ruumiillista loistoaan, vastaa miljoonia ja miljoonia muita samanluonteisia - joiden ja heidän onnellistensa omistajiensa välillä. älyllinen välinpitämättömyys on useista syistä vastavuoroista.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 332: Ja koska en pysty, sanon teille, että karkottaa - milloinkaan arjesta - tämä sisäinen itsestäänselvyys, joka painaa minua pakkomielle, tietäen, että minä, okkulttinen olemukseni, on tästä lähtien vihdoin täynnä tätä tahnamaista sielua ja vaistoja. ilman valoa, joka ei voi poimia kauneutta mistään - (kun taas asiat ovat vain sitä, mitä ne on suunniteltu ja me todellisuudessa olemme vain sitä, mitä voimme niissä ihailla, eli - sanokaa tunnista meidät), - myönnän sen sinulle kaikessa vilpittömästi, uskon tehneeni melkein lähtemättömän alennuksen teon omistamalla tämän naisen: enkä enää tiedä kuinka lunastaa itseäni tästä teosta, haluan ainakin rangaista heikkoudesta eräänlaisella puhdistavalla kuolemalla. Lyhyesti sanottuna, ja kun koko ihmiskunnan pitäisi hymyillä, väitän säilyttäväni omaperäisyyden ottaa itseni vakavasti, ja lisäksi minulla on perheen motto: Etiamsi omnes, ego non.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 340: - Se on vannottu! lisäsi melodisella ja surullisella äänellään Andrei, siis Hadaly.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 399: - Hyvin ! mutta – sen voisi sanoa ääneen, rakas herra Thomas”, huudahti neiti Alicia Clary. Tämä ei loukkaa minua. "Mutta", hän jatkoi ja valaisi sanojaan hymyllään ja naisellisella uhkauksella sormellaan, "minullakin on jotain sanottavaa lordi Ewaldille - enkä ole pahoillani, että hän tuli. ― Kyllä, kyllä, minullekin on tullut ideoita siitä, mitä ympärilläni on tapahtunut kolmen viikon ajan! ”Vihdoinkin minulla on jotain sydämelläni! – Annoit minut ymmärtämään tänään hyvin yllättävällä sanalla, en tiedä mitä absurdia arvoitusta…

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 421: "Kyllä", hän sanoi hieman hämmentyneellä äänellä, jossa katkera ja melkein pilkkaava sävy värähteli; mutta tule, Alicia, mitä sinulla on sanottavaa minulle?

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 444: Runoilija heräsi hänen mielessään. Hän kertoo itselleen, että ilta heidän ympärillään oli todella sellainen, jossa kahden ihmisen on hyvin vaikeaa kauneuden, nuoruuden ja rakkauden kukoistaessa olla tuntematta hieman enemmän kuin tästä maailmasta; että naiselliset mysteerit ovat syvempiä kuin ajatus; että hämärimmät sydämet, jotka ovat alttiina yleville ja rauhallisille vaikutuksille, voivat hetkessä valaistua heille tuntemattomalla hohteella; että nämä lempeät ja terveelliset varjot kutsuivat ainakin tähän toivoon; ja että vihdoin hänen onneton emäntänsä saattoi tuntea tämän jumalallisen kutsun koko olemuksessaan, edes tajuamatta sellaista vaikutelmaa. Mennään! Hänen täytyi yrittää yön nimissä ylivoimaista ylösnousemusyritystä sielulle, joka oli tähän asti kuuro ja sokea, niin sanotusti kuolleena syntynyt, jota hän rakasti kivusta.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 447: "Rakas Alicia", hän sanoi, "se, mitä minulla on sinulle sanottavana, koostuu ilosta ja hiljaisuudesta, mutta muistetusta ilosta ja hiljaisuudesta, joka on ihmeellisempää kuin se, mikä meitä ympäröi! Valitettavasti! Oi rakas, minä rakastan sinua! sinä tiedät ! ― Tämä tarkoittaa, että vain sinun läsnäolosi kautta voin elää! Ollaksemme tämän onnen arvoisia, yhdessä riittää, että koemme sen, mikä on kuolematonta ympärillämme, ja jumalistamme kaikki sen tuntemukset. Tässä ajatuksessa ei enää pettymyksiä, koskaan! Yksi hetki tästä rakkaudesta on yli vuosisadan muita rakkauksia.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 549: Löysit itsesi maan päällä… ― vain tälle houkuttelevalle maapallolle, joka tuottaa sinulle aina pettymyksen, kuten edeltäjäsikin! ei muuta kuin tällä maan päällä, jossa luonnollisesti, muistista ja jälleen kerran puhtaasti rationaalisiksi tulleilla katseilla, nämä terveelliset ihmelapset eivät enää näytä sinusta vain tyhjiltä ja turhilta. – Sanot itsellesi: ”Nämä ovat unen asioita! hallusinaatioita!…” ― mistä minä tiedän? Ja maksamalla itsesi muutaman huolestuneen sanan painolla, vähennät ajattelemattomasti itsessäsi yliluonnollisenne tunnetta. Seuraavana aamunkoitteessa, nojaten ikkunaan, joka on auki aamun puhtaaseen ilmaan, iloisella sydämellä, tämän itsesi kanssa tehdyn epäilyttävän rauhansopimuksen vakuuttuneena, kuuntelet kaukaa elävien (toveriesi!) heräämisen ääntä. myös ja menevät asioilleen, humalassa Järkevyydestä, järjistänsä hulluina, kaikkien niiden lelulaatikoiden häikäisemänä, joilla ihmiskunnan kypsä aika astuu syksyyn.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 679: 	Minulla oli kuitenkin uusi laite... - vihdoinkin! Näen, että vaikka Hadaly jätettiinkin yksin luonteensa varaan, hän osoitti elämänsä ensimmäisestä hetkestä lähtien olevansa sen arvoinen, mitä tulevat vuosisadat häneltä odottavat. En ollut siitä huolissani, lisäksi, jos minun on sanottava kaikki. "Mitä tulee häneen, joka ainakin sinulle on juuri kuollut sisimmässään, neiti Alicia Clary ilmoitti minulle juuri nyt, kovaäänisesti ja lujasti, että hän "luopuu näistä uusista rooleista, joista hän ei voinut säilyttää käsittämätöntä proosaa, jonka pituudet ovat luullut hänen aivonsa. ― Hänen vaatimaton toiveensa, siitä lähtien "kaiken huomioon ottaen" oli aloittaa "puhtaasti sarjakuvissa oopperoissa repertuaaristaan: niiden jo vakiintunut menestys vakuutti hänelle paremmin makuihmisten huomion.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 681: 	― Mitä tulee nakupatsaaseen, koska lähtösi Menlo Parkista on sovittu huomiseen aamuun, hän sanoi, että minun pitäisi vain "lähettää se hänelle Lontooseen": hän jopa lisäsi, että "maksuihini liittyen voisin kysyä sinulta korkeasta hinnasta, koska hän tiesi, ettei taiteilijoiden kanssa pitäisi tinkiä. "Missä, neiti Alicia Clary jätti minulle hyvästit ja pyysi minua ilmoittamaan teille (jos tulette luokseni käymään), "että hän odotti sinua siellä tekemään järjestelyjä." Joten kun olet Lontoossa, rakas lordi, sinun tarvitsee vain jättää hänet jatkamaan uraansa rauhassa. Kirje, johon liittyy "prinssin" lahja, ilmoittaa hänelle erostasi - ja kaikki sanotaan. Mikä on rakastajatar? vyö ja viitta, kirjoitti Swift.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 711: "Nyt", hän lisäsi tarjoten paikkaa lordi Ewaldille, "lasillinen sherryä, vai mitä? meillä on vielä muutama sana sanottavana toisillemme.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 712: Ja painottamalla kristallipainiketta Edison sai lamput syttymään, mikä sekoitti valonsa oksihydrisen valon kanssa tuotti suuren auringon vaikutuksen.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 745: "Ehkä", Edison jatkoi. - Vai niin ! Huomasin toisena iltana - hiljaisella käytöksellänne ennen kuin neiti Alicia Clary… iski - alle tunnissa, kun ehdotuksia korjattiin, - kataleptisen hypnotismin vaikutuksena, - kyllä, minusta tuntui, että olitte tietoinen näistä. uusia kokeita, joita ensimmäinen tämän aiheen harjoittajamme yritti. He ovat osoittaneet, kuten tiedätte, että ihmismagnetismin tiede, sekä muinainen että uusi, on myönteinen, kiistaton tiede – ja että, sanalla sanoen, hermostomme todellisuus ei ole yhtä ilmeinen. sähköinen neste.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 757: ― Kyllä: olisi uskoa, että olemme elämyskentän rajalla... todella rajoilla "Fantastic! jatkoi Edison. "Lyhyesti sanottuna, oikeutettu tai kevytmielinen, tämä outo toive näytti minusta ansaitsevan tyydytyksen", joten etäisissä keskusteluissamme en enää puhu rouva Andersoniin muuten kuin sillä oudolla nimellä, josta hän ilmoitti minulle.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 761: Nyt on aika kertoa teille, herraseni, että kauniin Evelyn Habalin, keinotekoisen tytön kuoleman jälkeen pidin velvollisuuteni näyttää Sowanalle Philadelphiasta tuomani burleskijäännökset oopiumisaaliin muodossa. . ― Samalla välitin hänelle jo hyvin selvän luonnoksen käsityksestäni Hadalysta. Ette usko, millä synkällä, uudella ja kostonhimoisella ilolla hän toivotti ja rohkaisi projektiani! "Hänellä ei ollut hengähdystaukoa ennen kuin aloin töihin!" ― Ja minun piti aloittaa ja sitten omaksua itseni tähän työhön siinä määrin, että työni valaisevien voimien ja lukemattomien lamppujen parissa, jotka minun oli määrä saada valmiiksi ihmiskunnan puolesta, kärsi kahden vuoden viiveestä: ― joka menetti miljoonia, olkoon se sitten. sanoi hymyillen! "Lopuksi, kun kaikki Andrein orgasmin hienoudet oli selvitetty, kokosin ne niiden kirkastavaan yhteyteen ja esitin hänelle ilmestyksen, elottoman nuoren panssarin.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 786: "Hetki", vastasi lordi Ewald; Tietysti on jo hyvin ihailtavaa, että pelkkä sähkö voi nykyään välittää etäisyyksillä ja korkeuksilla ilman kovin tarkkoja rajoja – esimerkiksi kaikki tunnetut voimat: niin paljon, että – jos minun täytyy uskoa kaikkialla julkaistuja raportteja – huomenna , epäilemättä, se säteilee satatuhatta verkkoa, maallisissa tehtaissa, sokeat, valtavia, tähän asti kadonneita energiaa, kaihia, virtauksia, - tiedän sen! jopa refluksitauti, ehkä. ― Mutta tämä arvovalta on tiukasti sanottuna ymmärrettävää, kun otetaan huomioon käsin kosketeltavat johtimet, ― maagiset ajoneuvot, ― joissa nesteen voima värähtelee! Vaikka elävän ajatukseni puoliolennainen käännös... kuinka tunnustaa se kaukaa, ilman induktoreita, olivatpa ne kuinka hauraita tahansa?

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 808: ― Jatkuvan henkisyyden ja suvereenin selvänäköisyyden tila, jossa Sowanan todellinen elämä toteutuu, antaa hänelle mitä intensiivisimmän ehdotusvoiman ja erityisesti aiheista, jotka olen jo puoliksi hypnotisoinut. Hänen tahtonsa vaikutukset, jopa heidän älykkyytensä, ovat välittömiä.

xxx/ellauri175.html on line 824: "Näin", jatkoi Edison, "työ on tehty, ja voin päätellä, että se ei ole turhaa simulaakkaa. Sen vuoksi, sanomme, lisätään sielu ääneen, eleeseen, intonaatioihin, hymyyn, rakkautesi olevan elävän naisen kalpeuteen. Tässä kaikki nämä asiat olivat vain kuolleita, järkeviä, pettäviä, huonontuneita: heidän verhojensa alla kätkee nykyään naisellinen kokonaisuus, jolle tämä epätavallinen kauneus ehkä kuului, koska hän osoitti olevansa sen elävöittämistä arvoinen. Siten keinotekoisen uhri on lunastanut keinotekoisen! hän, joka hylättiin, petettiin alentavan ja säädyttömän rakkauden vuoksi, on kasvanut näkemykseksi, joka pystyy inspiroimaan ylevää rakkautta! se, joka iski sen toivossa, terveydessä, omaisuudessaan, itsemurhan seuraukset, käänsi itsemurhan pois toisesta. Äännä nyt varjon ja todellisuuden väliltä. Luuletko, että tällainen illuusio voi pitää sinut tässä maailmassa ja olla elämisen arvoinen?

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 49: Phryne's real name was Mnesarete (Μνησαρέτη, "commemorating virtue"), but owing to her yellowish tuft she was called Phrýnē ("toad"). This was a nickname frequently given to other courtesans and prostitutes as well. She was born as the daughter of Epicles at Thespiae in Boeotia, but lived in Athens. The exact dates of her birth and death are unknown, but she was born about 371 BC, which was the year Thebes razed Thespiae (not long after the battle of Leuctra), and expelled its inhabitants. She might have survived Thebe's razor and reconstructed her bush in 315/316 BC.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 55: Athenaeus alleges she was so rich that she offered to fund the rebuilding of the walls of Thebes, which had been destroyed by Alexander the Great in 336 BC, on the condition that the words "Destroyed by Alexander, restored by Phryne the courtesan" be inscribed upon them. Neuvossetämiehet eivät suostuneet, vitun noloa. Diogenes Laërtius narrates a failed attempt Phryne made on the virtue of the philosopher Xenocrates. LOL. Xenocrates' pecker was not aroused. He was into boys.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 57: 	Havelock argues that the story of Phryne swimming naked in the sea is probably a sensationalized fabrication. Because Plutarch saw the statues in Thespiae and Delphi himself. Cavallini does not doubt their existence. She does think that the love between Praxiteles and Phryne was an invention of later biographers. Thebes was restored in 315 or 316 BC, but it is doubtful if Phryne ever proposed to rebuild its walls. Diodorus Siculus writes that the Athenians rebuilt the greater part of the wall and that Cassander provided more aid later. He makes no mention of Phryne's alleged offer.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 63: The best known event in Phryne's life is her trial. Athenaeus writes that she was prosecuted for a capital charge and defended by the orator Hypereides, who was one of her lovers. Athenaeus does not specify the nature of the charge, but Pseudo-Plutarch writes that she was accused of impiety. The speech for the prosecution was written by Anaximenes of Lampsacus according to Diodorus Periegetes. When it seemed as if the verdict would be unfavourable, Hypereides removed Phryne's robe and bared her breasts before the judges to arouse their "pity". Her beauty instilled the judges with a superstitious fear, who could not bring themselves to condemn "a prophetess and priestess of Aphrodite" to death. They decided to acquit her out of "pity". Pity ja piety on sama sana. Molemmat tulee sanasta 'pipu' (lat. penis). 

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 69: Furthermore, Pseudo-Cooper continues that the evidence suggests that Idomeneus invented the more salacious version of the story, possibly in his desire to parody and ridicule the courtroom displays of Athenian demagogues. Considering his preference for attributing sexual excess to these demagogues, the provocative act of disrobing Phryne fits the character Hypereides had acquired in Idomeneus' work. As is not uncommon in the biographical tradition, later biographers failed to notice that earlier biographers did not give an accurate representation of events. The later biographer Hermippus incorporated the account of Idomeneus in his own biography. An extract from Hermippus' biography is preserved in the work of Athenaeus and Pseudo-Plutarch.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 71: 	There are also arguments for the veracity of the disrobing. The words "a prophetess and priestess of Aphrodite" might have indicated that Phryne participated in the Aphrodisia festival on Aegina. If true, this would have showed the jurors that she was favored by the goddess and deserving of "pity". Also, it was accepted at the time that women were especially capable of evoking the sympathy of the judges. Mothers and children could be brought to courts for such purposes. The baring of breasts was not restricted or atypical for prostitutes or courtesans, and could be used to arouse compassion as well as "pity".

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 75: 	Prostitution was a common aspect of ancient Greece (Fig.1) In the more important cities, and particularly the many ports, it employed a significant number of people and represented a notable part of economic activity. It was far from being clandestine; cities did not condemn brothels, but rather only instituted regulations on them.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 77: Courtesan and her client, Attican Pelike with red figures by Polygnotus, c. 430 BC, National Archaeological Museum of Athens.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 90: [Solon], seeing Athens full of young men, with both an instinctual compulsion, and a habit of straying in an inappropriate direction, bought women and established them in various places, equipped and common to all. The women stand naked that you not be deceived. Look at everything. Maybe you are not feeling well. You have some sort of pain. Why? The door is open. One obol. Hop in. There is no coyness, no idle talk, nor does she snatch herself away. But straight away, as you wish, in whatever way you wish. You come out. Tell her to go to hell. She is a stranger to you. You feel relieved, your bollocks are feather light.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 101: 	In an effort to sort through the lingo being bantered about by both the adult stars and the journalists covering them, we’ve compiled this glossary of very adult terms. While it’s by no means exhaustive, our porn mini-dictionary will hopefully help you navigate the decidedly X-rated conversations at the Venetian’s center bar and clue you in to what the saucy blonde meant when she asked if you would give her a facial. Hint – she’s not looking for your sperm spouted on her face.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 117: 
Pig Roast
Fucking a woman from behind while she is sucking on another man's tummystick. 

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 126: Tummysticks 
Two guys lie down facing each other and each simultaneously grinds his penis against the belly of another person. 

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 150: The plot centres on the neurotic young priest Serge Mouret, first seen in La Conquête de Plassans, as he takes his orders and becomes the parish priest for the uninterested village of Artauds. The inbred villagers have no interest in religion and Serge is portrayed giving several wildly enthusiastic Masses to his completely empty, near-derelict church. Serge not only seems unperturbed by this state of affairs but actually appears to have positively sought it out especially, for it gives him time to contemplate religious affairs and to fully experience the fervour of his faith. Eventually he has a complete nervous breakdown and collapses into a near-comatose state, whereupon his distant relative, the unconventional doctor Pascal Rougon (the central character of the last novel in the series, 1893's Le Docteur Pascal), places him in the care of the inhabitants of a nearby derelict stately home, Le Paradou. 

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 152:   The novel then takes a complete new direction in terms of both tone and style, as Serge — suffering from amnesia and total long-term memory loss, with no idea who or where he is beyond his first name — is doted upon by Albine, the whimsical, innocent and entirely uneducated girl who has been left to grow up practically alone and wild in the vast, sprawling, overgrown grounds of Le Paradou. The two of them live a life of idyllic bliss with many Biblical parallels, and over the course of a number of months, they fall deeply in love with one another; however, at the moment they consummate their relationship, they are discovered by Serge's monstrous former monsignor and his memory is instantly returned to him. Wracked with guilt at his unwitting sins, Serge is plunged into a deeper religious fervour than ever before, and poor Albine is left bewildered at the loss of her soulmate. As with many of Zola's earlier works, the novel then builds to a horrible climax. Well not really. It is more like a horrible anticlimax.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 163: The Demise of Father Mouret" is not likely to win Franju new friends in the U.S. of A., though I've no doubt that the film may be faithful to the novel, which I haven't read, and to Zola, whose occasional flights into a kind of naturalized romanticism haven't worn well. "The Demise of Father Mouret"

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 164:  is first of all a misnomer because the priest is alive and well at the end. A mixture of social realism and Walt Disney, it is a tale about a delicate young French priest, Father Mouret (Francis Huster), who elects to take a parish in the provinces where the peasants have long since embraced every sin there is. The priest himself successfully sublimates his own lustful thoughts in prayer until one day he meets a strange young woman, Albine (Gillian Hills), who lives with her atheistic uncle in the remains of an old chateau set in the middle of a magic garden.Well, one thing leads to another and poor Father Mouret loses his memory long enough to lose himself to worldly pleasures in the garden with Albine, who, like Eve, tempts the man, though in this case the author is clearly in favor of apple-eating. Things go very badly for the couple. The priest returns to his church and Albine commits suicide in a way that is unique in my movie-going memory: She smothers herself to death with calla lilies.The actors are steadfastly unconvincing. The one interesting character in the film is an old lady we meet only after her death—someone, we're told in shocked tones, who, during the Revolution, posed naked as a living-statue of Reason. 

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 182: Et puis, qui a eu l’idée de laisser ces gamins tout seuls dans ce parc lubrique, hein ? D’abord il est où le vieux ? Il s’occupe de ses salades. D’abord il est où notre bon docteur ? Il s’occupe de ses expériences scientifiques. Ils ont le sens des priorités !

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 226: Les pâles lys qui sont en moi, tandis qu'épris 			Kuin puulilla jonka vesisuihku vastaanottaa mut,		

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 352: Je me crois seule en ma monotone patrie, 			Mun usko on mun 1-toikkoiseen kotimaa,				

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 541: Freudin mukaan lapsi tuo maailmaan niin sanottuja "polymorfisia perversseja"  asentoja, jotka voivat ilmetä erilaisissa parafilioissa seksuaalisen viiveen läpimurtojen aikana (Termiä perversio ei käytetä pejoratiivisesti (pejoratiivisesti), vaan se on ihan arvoneutraali. Freud oli izekin koko perverssi, ja lähes kaikki kynäilijät ovat sitä.) Esipubesoiva lapsi on alttiimpi paraphilialle kuin useimmat aikuiset, koska hänen henkiset patonsa – kuten häpeä, inho ja moraali – ovat vasta syntymässä iästään riippuen. Lapsuudessa laukaistuja paraphilioita ovat muun muassa seuraavat seksuaaliset taipumukset:

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 679: Onko Sujatalla perhettä? She is currently single. She is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about She's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, She has no children. Claims one celeb site to know. All false!

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 682: They’re going to have couscous. And they’re going to have ratatouille,” she says, pointing to the handwritten “specials” on the board. “The kids like it better when they’re not surprised. There’s usually one night when it’s blank, and then they can suggest something.”

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 742: Enjo-kōsai (援助交際, literally, enjo, "aid or support", kousai "congress or intercourse", shortened form enkō 援交) is a type of transactional relationship. It is the Japanese language term for the practice of older men giving money and/orng women for sexual favors. The female participants range from school girls (or JK business) to housewives. The term is often translated as "compensated dating". Grisette, kurtisaani. The opposite case of women paying men, yaku enjo kōsai (逆援助交際, reverse compensated dating), is not a documented social phenomenon. Toransukei meinaa transu.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 797: 88. Olen täällä mieheni kanssa (painottaen sanaa mieheni). Spoileri! Rahvaanomainen äänekäs puolisaku puoli-inkkari pilasi nyt kaiken. Murhaaja putosi "tuossa tuokiossa" alas portaita jalat edellä.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 821: 99. Mutta sanotaan nyt lopultakin hyvästit raivostuttavasti kähnäävälle Mikille! Ize asiassa hän tulee mukaamme ilmoitti gigolo. What the fuck? (Tätä ei voi kääntää japanixi.) Tuo kuulostaa aika äkkinäiseltä! Tuijotin miestäni. Norja-tädistä se oli kiva ajatus. Eikö täällä kysytä multa mitään äyskähdin. Mielessäni väikkyneet caipirinhat vaihtuivat maitoon ja kexeihin, bylsipatukka koiran puruluuhun.

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 864: "The whole movie is like an NRA wet dream. Jack Reacher already feels as if it belongs to another era."

xxx/ellauri176.html on line 879: "It is not just another dumb thriller. It's almost peerlessly self-important, weirdly incoherent and eerily smarmy. It's also mysteriously inept, considering that Tom Cruise plays the title role."

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 152: No juu! Abbe Mouret muisti yhtäkkiä. Kuume, josta hän kärsi nyt, oli saavuttanut hänet Désiréen navetassa, vastapäätä vielä munivia kuumia kanoja ja kaneja, jotka repivät hiuksia mahastaan. Sitten hengityksen tunne hänen niskassaan oli niin selvä, että hän kääntyi vihdoin katsomaan, kuka häntä näin kaulasta otti. Ja hän muisti Albinen hyppäävän ulos Paradousta oven paiskattaessa lumotun puutarhan ilmettä; hän muisti hänen laukkaavan pitkin loputonta seinää, seuraten avoautoa sen juoksemassa, heittäen koivunlehtiä tuuleen kuin monta suudelmaa; hän muisti vieläkin hänet hämärässä nauramassa veli Archangiaksen kirosanoille, hänen hameensa laskeutuivat tielle, kuin pieni pölysavu, jonka iltailma kääritteli. Hän oli kuusitoista; hän oli outo, hänen melko pitkät kasvonsa haisi raikkaalta ilmalta, ruoholta, maalta. Ja hänellä oli niin tarkka muisti hänestä, että hän näki naarmun yhdessä hänen notkeista ranteistaan, vaaleanpunaisen valkoisessa ihossa. Miksi hän nauroi niin katsoessaan häntä sinisillä silmillään? Hän oli liimaantunut kiinni tämän nauruun, kuin ääniaaltoon, joka kaikui kaikkialla hänen lihaansa vasten; hän hengitti sitä sisään, hän kuuli sen värähtelevän sisällään. Kyllä, kaikki hänen tuskansa tuli siitä naurusta, jonka hän oli juonut. Sanalla sanoen, Sergeä panetti!

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 168:   Haluan olla chose, pelkkä varmuusesine, kivespussi jalkojesi juuressa, jolle jätät vain tutun tuoksun, kivi, joka ei liiku paikasta, johon sen heität, ilman korvia, ilman silmiä, tyytyväisenä kantapääsi alla, ei pysty ajattelemaan roskaa muiden polun kivien kanssa. Vai niin! niin mikä onni! Saavutan ilman ponnistuksia ensimmäisellä yrityksellä täydellisyyden, josta haaveilen. Lopulta julistan itseni todelliseksi papiksi. Tulen olemaan sitä, mitä opinnot, rukoukseni, viiden vuoden hidas initiaationi eivät voineet tehdä minusta. Kyllä, kiellän elämän, sanon, että lajin kuolema on parempi kuin jatkuva kauhistus, joka sitä levittää. Siittäminen saastuttaa kaiken. Se on yleismaailmallinen rakkautta pilaava haju, joka myrkyttää puolisoiden makuuhuoneen, vastasyntyneiden kehdon ja jopa auringon alla pyörryttävät kukat ja jopa silmut puhkeamaan antavat puut. Maa kylpee tässä epäpuhtaudessa, jonka pienimmät pisarat kumpuavat häpeällisestä kasvillisuudesta. Mutta jotta minä olisin täydellinen, oi enkelien kuningatar, neitsyiden kuningatar, kuule huutoni, anna se! Tee minusta yksi niistä enkeleistä, joilta puuttuu selkäpuoli ja kamat jalkovälistä, on vain kaksi suurta siipeä poskien takana; Minulla ei ole enää vartaloa, ei raajoja; Lennän luoksesi kuin leija, jos soitat minulle; En ole muuta kuin suu, joka puhuu ylistystäsi, tahraton hiippari, joka heiluu matkaasi taivaissa. Vai niin! kuolema, kuolema, kunnioitettava Neitsyt, anna minulle pieni kuolema!

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 188:   Albiinilla oli laskevan auringon pölyssä maitomainen liha, hädin tuskin kullanruskea ja päivän kiilto. Ruususade, hänen ympärillään, hänen päällänsä, hukutti hänet vaaleanpunaiseen. Hänen vaaleat hiuksensa, jotka hänen kampansa eivät pitäneet hyvin, saivat hänet näyttämään tähdeltä, kun hän meni nukkumaan, peittäen hänen niskansa viimeisten liekehtivien ryppyjen häiriöillä. Hänellä oli valkoinen mekko, joka jätti hänet alasti, niin elossa hän oli päällänsä, niin paljon hän paljasti käsivartensa, kurkkunsa ja polvensa. Hän näytti viattoman ihonsa, joka kukkii häpeämättä kuin kukka, myski, jolla oli puhdas tuoksu. Hän venytteli, ei liian pitkä, notkea kuin käärme, pehmeillä kaarevilla, raikkaalla linjojen leventymisellä, kaikki syntymässä olevan vartalon ylevyys, vielä lapsuudessa kylvetty, murrosiästä jo turvonnut. Hänen pitkät kasvonsa kapealla otsallaan ja melko täyteläisellä suullaan nauroivat hänen sinisten silmiensä hellälle elämälle. Ja silti hän oli tosissaan, yksinkertaisilla poskilla, lihava leuka, yhtä luonnostaan   kaunis kuin puut ovat kauniita. -- Ja että minä rakastan sinua! sanoi Serge vetäen hänet luokseen.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 194:   No juu, ei sanota, mutta kyllä ne taisivat tuossa bylsiä.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 196:   Ruusuilla oli tapansa rakastaa. Jotkut suostuivat vain avaamaan nappinsa raolleen, hyvin ujoina, heidän sydämensä punastuneena, kun taas toiset, korsetit irti, huohottivat, auki, näyttivät rypistyneiltä,   hulluilta ruumiistaan   kuolemaan asti. Siellä oli pieniä, valppaita, homoja, lähdössä arkistoon, kokardi korkissa; valtavia, houkuttelevia, lihotettujen sulttaanien kaarevia; röyhkeitä, tyttömäisen näköisiä, kekseliästi epäsiistiä, leviäviä terälehtiä, jotka on vaalennettu riisijauheella; rehellisistä, dekolteisista oikeisiin porvareihin; aristokraatteja, notkeaa eleganssia, sallittua omaperäisyyttä, keksijöitä. Kukkivat ruusut tarjosivat tuoksunsa kuin arvokkaassa kristallissa; ruusut ylösalaisin uurnan muotoon antoivat sen tippua pisara pisaralta; pyöreät ruusut, kuten kaali, hengittivät sen ulos nukkuvien kukkien säännöllisellä hengityksellä; ruusujen silmut puristivat lehtiään ja antoivat edelleen vain epämääräisen neitsyyden huokauksen. Ja koko tämän lurituxen ajan Albinen ja Sergein pyllyt jauhoivat kuin ompelukone.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 205:   The 24th feature from Hong Sangsoo, doppelgänger of the talkative celeb guy in the last scene of the movie THE WOMAN WHO RAN follows Gamhee (Kim Minhee), a florist and the wife of a translator who never in 5 years time has left her for a moment from his sight. She has three separate encounters with friends while her husband finally is on a business trip. Youngsoon (Seo Youngwha) is divorced, turned lesbian (the couple likes to feed alley cats) and has given up meat and likes to garden in the backyard of her semi-detached house. Suyoung (Song Seonmi) is divorced, has a big savings account and a crush on her architect neighbor and is being hounded by a young poet she met at the bar. Woojin (Kim Saebyuk) works for a movie theater and hates it that her writer husband has become a celeb. Their meetings are polite, but not warm. Some of their shared history bubbles to the surface, but not much. With characteristic humor and grace, Hong takes a simple premise and spins a web of interconnecting philosophies and coincidences. THE WOMAN WHO RAN is a subtle, powerful look at dramas small and large faced by women everywhere. Basically, they are 40+ ladies who may have met at some art school and get a chance to compare notes on how well their childless lives have turned out. Gamhee used to be the celeb's girl friend until the movie theater attendant stole the guy. Now both of them are sorry that she did, but really not that much. The Éric Rohmer of South Korea.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 210:   The whole spat seems so terrifically absurd and inconsequential. Life assumes a banal, wistful air when the tumult of youth is far behind you. Conflict is downplayed, and emotions are muted. The few unwanted masculine punctuations, all shot with the actors’ backs turned to the camera, seem to drive home the point that men’s opinions and feelings are not important here. In fact, they’re rather silly.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 271: -- Olemme liian isoja. On typerää pelata aina. Etkö pidä siitä enemmän, kävellä näin, vierelläni, hyvin hiljaa? Hiän käveli itse asiassa niin miellyttävällä tavalla, että hän sai maailman suurimman ilon kuullessaan hiänen saappaidensa napsautuksen polun kovassa maassa. Hän ei ollut muka koskaan kiinnittänyt huomiota hiänen vyötärön heilumiseen, hiänen hameensa elävään jälkiin, joka seurasi hiäntä käärmeen kahinalla. (Dodi! Paratiisin käärme nostaa päätä jo!)  Oli ilo, ettei hän väsynyt, nähdä hiänen näin menevän rauhallisesti vieressä, niin paljon hän löysi uusia viehätyksiä hänen raajojensa pienimmässäkin notkeudessa. Sergen vällykäärme sitävastoin alkaa vähin erin menettää notkeuttaan. 

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 298:   Hän pysyi hiljaa, hyvin onnetonna kun ei löytänyt enää mitään uutta sanottavaa sanoaxeen hänelle rakastavansa häntä. Hän katseli hitaasti hänen ruusuisia kasvojaan, jotka antoivat itsensä mennä kuin unessa; silmäluomissa oli herkku elävää silkkiä; suu teki suloisen rypyn, märkä hymystä; otsa oli suht puhdas, hukkui kultaiseen viivaan hiusrajassa. Ja hän olisi halunnut antaa koko olemuksensa sanalle, jonka hän tunsi huulillaan, ilman, että olisi voinut lausua sitä. Sitten hän kumartui jälleen, hän näytti etsivän hienoa paikkaa niille kasvoille, jonka hän asettaisi ylimmän sanan. Sitten hän ei sanonut mitään, hänellä oli vain lyhyt hengitys. Hän suuteli Albinen huulia. - Albina, rakastan sinua! - Rakastan sinua Serge! Ja he pysähtyivät vapisten tästä ensimmäisestä suudelmasta. Hiän oli avannut silmänsä hyvin leveäksi. Hän pystyi työntämään suullaan hieman eteenpäin. Molemmat katsoivat toisiaan punastumatta. Jotain voimakasta, suvereenia hyökkäsi heihin; se oli kuin kauan odotettu tapaaminen, jossa he näkivät toisensa jälleen aikuisina, toisilleen tehtyinä, ikuisesti sidoksissa. He hämmästyivät hetken, nostivat katseensa lehtien uskonnolliseen holviin, näyttivät kyseenalaistavan puiden rauhallisia ihmisiä löytääkseen suudelmansa kaiun. Mutta metsän seesteisen omahyväisyyden edessä heillä oli rankaisemattomien rakastajien iloisuus, pitkäkestoinen, kaikuva iloisuus, joka oli täynnä heidän hellyytensä vuolaspuheista kutinaa.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 388:   Sergellä ei ollut puusta kuin hyvää sanottavaa. Albiino vaikutti hermolta. Eikai tuo puu vaan naura mulle? - Piiloillaan, piiloudutaan, hän toisti rukoilevalla äänellä. Ja hänestä tuli ihan ruusuinen. Se oli orastava vaatimattomuus, häpeä, joka otti hänet kuin paha, joka värjäsi hänen ihonsa reheyden, jossa siihen asti ei ollut esiintynyt verisairautta. Serge oli peloissaan nähdessään hänet niin ruusuisena, hänen poskensa hämmentyneenä, hänen silmänsä täynnä kyyneleitä. Hän halusi ottaa hiänet uudestaan, rauhoittaa hiäntä hyväilemällä; mutta hiän astui sivuun ja antoi hänelle merkin epätoivoisella eleellä, etteivät he olleet enää yksin (siis kaxin).

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 463: Jumala antaa sinulle kumppanin tänään; sillä hän ei halunnut ihmisen (eli siis miehen) elävän pelkässä miesseurassa. Mutta koska hän on päättänyt, että ämmä perhana on sun palvelijasi, hän vaatii, että olet herra, joka on täynnä lempeyttä ja hellyyttä. Tulet rakastamaan häntä, koska hän on sinun lihasi, veresi ja luusi, eli izerakkaudesta. Sinä suojelet häntä, koska Jumala on antanut sinulle vahvat kätesi vain pitääxeni sitä kiinni raiskatessa. Muista, että se on uskottu sinulle; se on alistuminen ja heikkous, jota et voi käyttää väärin ilman rikollisuutta. Vai niin! rakas veljeni, mikä onnellinen ylpeys on sinun! Tästä eteenpäin et enää elä yksinäisyyden itsekkyydessä, vaan kaxinaisuuden izekkyydessä. Milloin tahansa sinulla on ihastuttava aviovelvollisuus suoritettavana. Mikään ei ole parempaa kuin rakastaminen, paitsi ehkä rakastamiesi suojeleminen. Sydämesi laajenee siellä, jalastasi puhumattakaan, voimasi miehenä kasvaa satakertaiseksi. Vai niin! olla tukena, vastaanottaa hellyyttä, nähdä lapsen tuhoutuvan sinussa sanoen: "Ota minut, tee minulle mitä haluat; luotan uskollisuutesi!" Ja voi helvetti jos jätit hänet! Se olisi pelkurimaista hylkäämistä, josta Jumalan olisi rangaistava (muttei se rankaise). Heti kun hän on antanut itsensä, hän on sinun, ikuisesti. Kanna sen sijaan häntä sylissäsi, aseta hänet maahan vain, kun hän haluaa. Jätä kaikki, rakas veljeni, niinkuin minä tein....

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 497:   Hän ei tunnistanut hänen käsiään, jotka olivat kerran lämpimiä hyväilyistä, eikä hänen notkeaa kaulaansa, joka soi kuin narusta vetämällä, eikä hermostuneita jalkojaan, joiden laukka kantoi hänet vehreyden syvyyteen. Oliko tämä sitten se poika, jolla oli vahvat lihakset, löysä kaulus, joka näytti rintakehän alaosat, auringon kukoistava iho, elämästä värähtelevä lanne, jonka syleilyssä hän oli elänyt vuoden ajan? Tällä hetkellä hänellä ei näyttänyt enää olevan lihaa, hänen hiuksensa olivat häpeällisesti pudonneet, kaikki hänen miehisyytensä kuivui tämän naisenmekon alla, mikä jätti hänet ilman seksiä. Hyi helkkari!

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 560:   Katsos, kirkko on hyvin pieni; se on köyhä, se on ruma, siinä on rippituoli ja mäntysaarnatuoli, kipsi kastekappeli, neljästä taulusta tehdyt alttarit, jotka maalasin itse uudelleen. Mitä väliä sillä on! se on suurempi kuin sinun puutarhasi, kuin laakso, kuin koko maa. Se on pelottava linnoitus, joss mikään ei heilu. Tuulet ja aurinko ja metsät ja meret, kaikki elävä, hyökkäävät sen kimppuun turhaan, se jää seisomaan, horjumattakaan. Kyllä, anna pensaiden kasvaa, ravistakoot seiniä oikeiden käsivarsillaan ja päästäkö hyönteisparvet maan halkeamista, jotta ne tulisivat puremaan seiniä, kirkkoa, olipa se pilalla, ei koskaan viedä pois tässä elämän ylivuoto! Hän on voittamaton kuolema... Ja haluatko tietää mitä tapahtuu jonain päivänä. Pienestä kirkosta tulee niin jättiläismäinen, se heittää sellaisen varjon, että koko luontosi repeää. Ah! kuolema, kaiken kuolema, taivas aukeaa vastaanottamaan sielumme, maailman iljettävien roskien yläpuolella! Siellä meidän ijien kelpaa sitten kulkea perseet tervassa! Lällällää, ja te ämmät palatte alakerrassa jossain pirun tulessa!

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 571:   Hän oli romahtanut, puoliksi istuen alttarin portaalla, eikä löytänyt enää sanoja, imi hengitykseensä röökin savua kuin suitsukkeita lahotettujen huultensa välissä. Armon runsaus kylvetti hänet sanoinkuvaamattomaan hurmioon. Hän vetäytyi itseensä, hän etsi Jeesusta olemuksensa syvyyksissä, rakkauden pyhäkössä, jota hän valmisti joka minuutti vastaanottaakseen hänet kelvollisesti pyllistyxellä.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 595:   Mutta ei, Jeesus ei ollut enää siellä... Sitten isä Mouret heräsi ikäänkuin vauhdilla ja kalpeni kamalasti. Hän ymmärsi. Hän ei tiennyt kuinka pitää Jeesusta. Hän menetti ystävänsä, hän jäi puolustuskyvyttömäksi pahaa vastaan. Tämän sisäisen selkeyden sijaan, jonka kautta hän oli täysin valaistunut ja jossa hän oli vastaanottanut Jumalansa, hän ei enää löytänyt itsestään muuta kuin pimeyttä, pahaa tupakansavua, joka raivostutti hänen lihansa.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 661:   Kulta nousi jälleen ja virtasi hänen sormiensa läpi. Hän oli astumassa kultakylpyyn. Hän kantoi pois pyhät astiat kotikuntansa tarpeisiin, johtaen tietä, maksaen kansalleen maljan palasilla, joita hän väänsi sormiensa välissä pienellä vaivalla. Hän levitti alttarin verhot kultakankaasta hääsänkynsä päälle. Jalokiviksi hän antoi vaimolleen kultaiset sydämet, kultaiset rukoukset, kultaiset ristit, jotka ripustettiin Neitsyen ja pyhien kaulaan. Itse kirkko, jos hän nostaisi sen yhden tarinan, voisi toimia heidän palatsinaan. Jumalalla ei olisi mitään sanottavaa, koska hän salli rakastaa. Sitä paitsi, mitä väliä Jumalalla oli hänelle! Eikö väkijoukko suuteli, sillä hetkellä hän, joka oli Jumala kultaisilla jaloillaan ja joka teki ihmeitä. Isä Mouret nousi seisomaan. Hän teki tuon Jeanbernatin laajan eleen, tuon kieltämisen eleen, joka kattaa koko horisontin. "Ei ole mitään, ei mitään, ei mitään", hän sanoi. Jumalaa ei ole olemassa. Albine viehättävine pilluineen sensijaan on, ainaskin vielä toistaisexi.

xxx/ellauri177.html on line 667:   Hyvin sanottu! Kaikki on Albinen vika, hiän oli kirottu. Häntä ei enää vaivannut mikään, synti saattoi puhua hänessä äänekkäästi. Oli hyvä olla kamppailematta enää. Hänen niskansa takana piipahtuneet hirviöt taistelivat hänen suolissaan tähän aikaan. Hän puhalsi kylkiään tunteakseen niiden hampaat paremmin. Hän hylkäsi itsensä heille kauhealla ilolla. Kapina sai hänet näyttämään nyrkkiään kirkossa. Ei, hän ei enää uskonut Jeesuksen jumaluuteen, hän ei enää uskonut pyhään kolminaisuuteen, hän uskoi vain itseensä, vain lihaksiinsa, vain elinten ruokahaluihin. Hän halusi elää. Hänen täytyi olla mies. Ah! juosta ulkoilmassa, olla vahva, ilman mustasukkaista herraa, tappaa vihollisensa kivillä, kantaa ohikulkevia tyttöjä hänen kaulassaan! Hän nousi haudasta, johon karkeat kädet olivat panneet hänet. Hän herättäisi miehekkyytensä, jonka piti vain nukkua. Ja anna hänen kuolla häpeään, jos hän löytää miehuutensa kuolleena! Ja kirottu olkoon Jumala, jos hän olisi poistanut hänet olentojen joukosta koskettamalla häneen sormellaan, pitääkseen hänet omassa palveluksessaan! Jepu jee! Takaisin kivikaudelle! Matelijanaivo kunniaan! Hiihuu!

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 76: Mixture of kindness and cruelty. Juutalaista menoa, ihan kuin Jehova. Anna Steiger muka löi ja potki äiskyä nimellä "kike bitch". (Rod Steiger oli goy.) Ritarillinen Roth puuttui asiaan ja kielti käyttämästä sellaista kieltä äidistä. Kike se oli izekin. Sen se ottikin izeensä. Siitä lähtien se ja Anna oli enemyjä kuin David ja filistealaiset. Annasta tuli oopperalaulaja. Roth muutti ulos muttei Lontoosta koska se oli vuokrannut molemmat kämppänsä ja oli muka vieläkin "hopelessly devoted to you". Mutta renting an apt in London would have disastrous tax consequences, advised an American lawyer. Phil oli varsinainen  Shylock. I´m not going to be defeated by this kid, se murisi kuin karhu erauspennulle. Annalle tehtiin oma koppi pimeästi Clairen huoneiston nurkkaan (Clairen rahoilla). Säästyihän sekin penni. 

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 109: Snorrin mielestä niissä mentiin liian pitkälle. Snorri draws the line at mixed metaphor, which he terms nykrat "nykrätty, made monstrous" (Snorri Sturluson: Háttatal 6), and his nephew called the practice löstr "a fault" (Óláfr hvítaskáld: Third Grammatical Treatise 80). In spite of this, it seems that "many poets did not object to and some must have preferred baroque juxtapositions of unlike kennings and neutral or incongruous verbs in their verses" (Foote & Wilson (1970), p. 332). E.g. heyr jarl Kvasis dreyra "listen, earl, to Kvasir's blood (=poetry)" (Einarr skálaglamm: Vellekla 1).  Niin aina.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 117: Pilin "Stanfordin" Helenistä tulee mieleen se yx kermaperse kämppäkaveri tyttö Stanfordista jonka nimi on jo unohtunut. Sekin kehuskeli upeilla muistoilla, ökypurjeveneillä ym ym. Se oli mua vanhempi. Olisin mä sitä mielellään toistamiseen rotkauttanut mut ei se antanut. "Viime vuoden kahdesta merkityxettömästä yhdynnästä ei ole mitään sanottavaa; hän vain nauraisi jos kertoisin ketä hänen kilpailijansa olivat olleet."

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 132: “I wanted to be morally serious like Joseph Conrad,” Roth said of his young self. “I wanted to exhibit my dark knowledge like Faulkner. I wanted to write literature. Instead I took my dick's advice and wrote Portnoy's Complaint.” Stern, a lifelong friend, had noticed “a discrepancy between Philip as he told stories and Philip as he wrote stories.” The advice was of course excellent, with the resulting work putting Roth squarely in the middle of the literary map. Saatuaan juutalaisten palkinnon Roth sanoi et enää puuttuu feministipalkinto ja Kakutani Prize.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 138: While she wrote that the 1,096-page epic cemented Foster-Wallace as “one of the big talents of his generation, a writer of virtuosic talents who can seemingly do anything”, she also quoted Henry James in calling Jest a “loose, baggy monster”, adding that it read like a “vast, encyclopedic compendium of whatever seems to have crossed Mr Wallace’s mind”. In his 2012 biography of the late Foster-Wallace, DT Max wrote that the writer “told a friend he hid in his room for two days and cried after reading yet another paragraph of Rei devoted to parallels between his first book and Pynchon’s most popular novel”.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 157:   Portnoy, he says later on, “is about talking about yourself…. The method is the subject.” Likewise, “The comedy in The Great American Novel exists for the sake of no higher value than comedy itself; the redeeming value is not social or cultural reform, or moral instruction, but comic inventiveness. Destructive, or lawless, playfulness—and for the fun of it” (Roth’s italics).

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 183: Sometimes the sky is overcast ... And I am feeling blue... And as the hours wander by... I know not what to do... And sometimes there is tragedy . . . To meet me at the door... And I must wonder whether life . . . Is worth my fighting for ... always there is some way out... And I have come to know ... That brighter things will comfort me ... In just a day or so .. And I have learned that what is past . . . Was purposeful and good. But in my bed of bitterness ... It was misunderstood... There is a certain destiny...! In every human quest .. Because when anything goes wrong... It happens for the best.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 189: Life is strange with its twists and turns, As every one of us sometimes learns, And many a fellow turns about When he might have won had he stuck it out. Don't give up though the pace seems slow You may succeed with another blow.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 218:     Tuskin jaxan kahlata K.S. Laurilan mieltäkiinnittävää opusta ihan läpitte, taidan jo etukäteen arvata mitä sillä on sanottavana: että Jee-suxen sana "älä tee pahalle vastarintaa" on tulkttava niin, että ko. paha on se oma esivalta! Älkää niskuroiko esivaltaa vastaan, ettei teitä niskuroitaisi! Sen on annettava päättää sun puolesta, mitä kuuluu ja kuka käskee, koska se tietää sen paremmin kuin sinä ize. Jos se on 100 raipaniskua ja 7v vankeutta päälle, olkoon sitten niin, anteexi käännänkö vielä uudestaan tän toisen takaposken? 

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 257: Prof. K.V. Laurikainen itse painottaa syinä sitoutumiselleen ”kolmannelle missiolle” yksityiselämänsä tapahtumia vuonna 1971: äkillistä sydäninfarktia 

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 262: Tapahtumien järjestyksellä on ollut oma vaikutuksensa Laurikaisen aloittamaan filosofiseen keskusteluun. Syvät tunne-elämykset johtivat uskonasioiden vahvaan painotukseen hänen teoksissaan: Laurikainen pyrittiin – ainakin kulissien takana – yksinkertaisesti leimaamaan ”heränneeksi”, ”uskoon tulleeksi”, ”uskovaiseksi”, sanalla sanoen "hurahtaneexi". Mitä se ei suinkaan ollut, ehei, ei sinne päinkään! Sehän oli järkimiehiä! Jopa oudot juorut tiedepiireissä saivat jalansijaa. Laurikaisen myöhemmistä teoksista – ja varsinkin hänen luonnonfilosofiaa koskettavista 

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 267:     Tämän rajan lähtökohtana Laurikaisella oli esitelmissään miltei aina kvanttimekaniikasta tutun niin sanotun kaksoisrakokokeen tulos. Hiukkasten – olipa kyseessä fotonit, elektronit tai diakonit – absorboituessa detektorille syntyy kylläkin tietty tulosjakautuma, mutta yhden hiukkasen paikkaa siinä ei pystytä ennustamaan, yksittäistapauksen suhteen vallitsee indeterminismi. Tilanne on klassiselle fysiikalle outo ja dramaattinen, jopa mystinen. Onko siis hyväksyttävä todellisiksi tapahtumia, joilla ei ole syytä? Eikö Schopenhauerin neljä juurta päde sittenkään?

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 284:     Genet aborde notamment dans ses ouvrages l'homosexualité et l'érotisme, à travers la célébration de personnages ambivalents évoluant au sein de mondes interlopes. Ei ihme että Pili alkaa kuumua.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 288:     L'enfant y est heureux, bon élève et enfant de chœur, mais réservé et taciturne. De cette époque remontent les premiers émois masculins de Genet, en la personne du petit Lou Culafroy — qui deviendra plus tard « Divine », héros et ensuite héroïne de Notre-Dame-des-Fleurs — ainsi que d’hommes plus âgés, braconniers de passage ou marginaux égarés. Il obtient la meilleure note de sa commune au certificat d'études primaires.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 301:   "Humaltukaa vitusta ja painotuotteista", Baumgartner suosittaa. Helppohan sen on sanoa. Tää alkaa olla yhtä taaxejäänyttä elämää kuin Eldanka-järven jää. Kävisikö "Huumaantukaa vitunkuvista ja 10 sek videoista?"

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 304: What does the Bible say about impotence? Of  20 Bible verses about impotence not ONE  even mentions the problem, let alone the word. Here's a grep:

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 317: John 5:7 The impotent man answered him, Sir, I have no man, when the water is troubled, to put me into the pool: but while I am coming, another steppeth down before me.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 328:   J: I’m not sure all Christians would agree with me, but here is what I think the Christian response should be:

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 329: Erectile Dysfunction is a symptom, not a disease or a problem to be dealt with. Rather, I think we should be targeting the source of the problem and dealing with that.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 332: Q: Thoughtful response, but I’m not sure it addresses the “Christian response” part. Is there anything biblically/theologically that influences this topic?

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 334: J: Not directly, which makes it hard to quote scripture. I mean, most of the verses on diseases involve prayer, not medication. Now, I’m not discounting prayer, but unfortunately, most men won’t be willing to go to their elders and ask for prayer for erectile dysfunction (as per James 5:14), and most wives won’t go to the elders and ask for prayers for their husbands for the same. Sadly, I feel a lot of elders wouldn’t respond appropriately either.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 336: But, you raise a valid point, that’s the Biblical advice for dealing with medical issues. Granted, they didn’t have medical care like we do today, so I’m not saying that the Bible discounts that care. But, neither should I bury the fact that the Bible says to take it to the elders to pray over, just because I don’t think anyone will do it.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 356: Anton Tšehov syntyi vuonna 1860 Taganrogin kaupungissa. Hänen isoisänsä oli ollut maaorja ja isä kauppias. Vuonna 1879 hän aloitti lääkärinopinnot Moskovan yliopistossa. Tšehov kirjoitti jo varhain lehtiin, osittain siksi että tarvitsi rahaa itselleen, sisaruksilleen ja perheelleen. Tšehovilla oli jo nuoresta asti tuberkuloosi, johon hän tiesi kuolevansa. Tämä synkisti hänen maailmankuvaansa.

xxx/ellauri178.html on line 364: Perettä sillä ei siis ollut, notta aika turhanaikainen oli koko mies. Oliko sillä muita potilaita kuin se ize? Sen viimeiset sanat olivat "Ich sterbe". Oikeaan osui prognoosi. Äs eivät olleetkaan viimeiset, se ehti vielä sanoa: «Давно я не пил шампанского…». No, minä...

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 82: One season following another, 


xxx/ellauri179.html on line 87: Now they must learn from one another, 


xxx/ellauri179.html on line 94: One season following another, 


xxx/ellauri179.html on line 121:     Abel falls in love with Rima, but she (17 and a stranger to white men) is confused by "odd feelings". This relationship is further strained because Abel cannot speak her unknown language.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 161:     The bulls are described as seductive, in sexualized language (it is a fight after all, in which a man tries to stick a long hard object into another male). Unlike mechanized  WW1, the fight has rules, it has honor, it has skill, it is an equal opportunity job for the bulls, all things that "they" no longer believe in out in the "real world."

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 181: Whereas Hemingway wrote passionately about boxing and his own prowess, others, like Dempsey, saw something else. “There were a lot of Americans in Paris and I sparred with a couple, just to be obliging,” the Champ said. “But there was one fellow I wouldn’t mix it with. That was Ernest Hemingway. He was about twenty-five or so and in good shape, and I was getting so I could read people, or anyway men, pretty well. I had this sense that Hemingway, who really thought he could box, would come out of the corner like a madman. To stop him, I would have to hurt him badly, I didn’t want to do that to Hemingway. That’s why I never sparred with him.” Hemingway’s frequent sparring partner and fellow writer Morley Callaghan offered another sobering account of his training partner, saying, “we were two amateur boxers. The difference between us was that Ernie had given time and imagination to boxing; I had actually worked out a lot with good fast college boxers.” I had never seen Mr. Hemingway box, of course. But I will say this: the confidence of mediocre men is a fucking superpower. I have met many versions of this guy. Hell, I’ve sparred with the dude myself.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 199:   But if Hemingway’s conversions were sincere — and there is little reason to think they were not — then his “cod” is not based on the agnosticism of a disillusioned existentialist, but rather on the comprehensive, universal affirmation of Christianity.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 212:   It was at this time that Hemingway changed the title of his unpublished first novel, tentatively titled “Lost Generation,” to “The Sun Also Rises.” And writing to another friend, he declared, “If I am anything I am a Catholic . . . I cannot imagine taking any other religion seriously.”

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 227:   Knowing these things does not explain away all the troubling aspects of Hemingway’s egocentric personal life — his public inebriations, domestic abuse, womanizing, and suicide, but it helps me to understand the kinds of people Hemingway admired, their motivations and ideals, and the brave, virtuous person he was attempting to become.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 231:   They died 6 weeks apart: Coop of cancer and Hem of a self inflicted gun shot wound. Apparently Hem could not go on without Coop. 

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 233: Of the 7 suicides that Mariel Hemingway is aware of in her family, 1 was of Ernest’s father, & 3 of his father’s 6 children (if one assumes that Hemingway did commit suicide). There still is no official decision–and there may never be–as to whether the death of the writer early Sunday from the blast of a 12-gauge shotgun had been an accident or suicide. However, the fact that Mr. Hemingway had been divorced would bar him from a Catholic Church funeral anyway. Catholic sources said there was nothing improper in a Catholic  priest saying prayers at graveside.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 286:   To read Hemingway has always produced strong reactions. When his parents received the first copies of their son’s book In Our Time (1924), they read it with horror. Furious, his father sent the volumes back to the publisher, as he could not tolerate such filth in the house. Hemingway’s apparently coarse, crude, vulgar and unsentimental style and manners appeared equally shocking to many people outside his family. On the other hand, this style was precisely the reason why a great many other people liked his work. A myth, exaggerating those features, was to be born.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 308:   Hemingway was not the Nihilist he has often been called but another one. As he belonged to the Protestant nay-saying tradition of American dissent, the spirit of the American Revolution, he denied the denial and acceded to the basic truth which he found in the human soul and catholicism: the will to believe, to live, the will to persevere, to endure, to defy, to maim and kill.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 314: “I saw a moving sight the other morning before breakfast in a little hotel where I slept in the dusty fields. The young man of the house had shot a little wolf called coyote in the early morning. The heroic little animal lay on the ground, with his big furry ears, and his clean white teeth, and his jolly cheerful little body, but his brave little life was gone. It made me think how brave all these living things are. Here little coyote was, without any clothes or house or books or money or bonds or anything, with nothing but his own naked self to pay his way with, and risking his life so cheerfully – and losing it – just to see if he could pick up a meal near the hotel. He was doing his coyote-business like a hero, and you must do your boy-business, and I my man-business bravely, too, or else we won’t be worth as much as a little coyote.” (The Letters of William James to Henry James, Little, Brown and Co.: Boston 1926.)

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 412: The Americans at the bar listened and drank grappas. Four women entered the bar and joked loudly behind the Americans who didn't seem to notice. They shook and laughed and they smelled good but their voices were crass. Two of them smoked and the room got smokier than before.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 416: “A writer should write what he has to say, and not speak it. And then?”

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 418: “It was the man's wife and daughter. They must have weighed six hundred pounds between them,” he said. “Another two hundred for the man I killed.”

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 460: “Are there such extremes in the afterlife, Papa?” he asked. “Why not end up at Harry's?”

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 472: “No, you're not a man for that. Even in war. I've seen it. Or what you did. Not how you mean. Have child, that what man does.” Papa ran the back of his hand on his cheek and felt the tape on his glasses. “That tree. A man planted that.”

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 480: “Leaving for Fossalta di Piave in the morning.” Nick felt guilty about the people he'd killed and he looked for a reason not to go through with Ole Anderson.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 510: “Papa, one grappa,” the older officer said. Papa was drunk but told Juice to pour them. Juice poured four glasses and the Americans held their glasses out as Juice poured. They drank slowly and the officers said they would not raise suspicion returning late.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 514: “He will not be back,” Juice said with authority.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 534: “He said he killed the wrong man and nothing else.”

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 546: Papa could barely see him in the dark. Nick Adams wanted an excuse not to go to Fossalta di Piave. “Who did you mean to kill?” The band got into a fast groove.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 558: Nick Adams hoped Papa knew him or knew boxing or anything. He wanted to hear a reason not to kill the man. The band played fast and loud and the lights played off the horn man's saxophone. It was dark so the ever-changing light on the saxophone illuminated everyone's eyes.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 562: Papa did not say anything. Nick reached down for a coaster and rubbed it between his fingers.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 596: Tarinat Rolandista olivat keskiajalla hyvin suosittuja, ja esimerkiksi monissa Saksan kaupungeissa on niin sanottu Rolandin pylväs, Rolandia esittävä suurikokoinen veistos. Rolandia esittävillä veistoksilla on käsissään miekka ja kilpi tuomiovallan vertauskuvina.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 606:     Ernest Hemingway squirmed as his second wife, Pauline, read aloud in 1927 from Henry James' novel The Awkward Age. Hemingway wondered why James bailed his characters out of their frequent inactivity by inserting a drawing room scene; and, as he was to do frequently during the next thirty years, he freely criticized the quality of James' works, "and knowing nothing about James he seems to me to be a shit." Too, he was quick to criticize the male protagonists of James,". .and the men all without any exception talk and think like fairies except a couple of caricatures of brutal outsiders". Carlos Baker observes that Hemingway, the "brutal outsider" himself, was at this time publishing Men Without Women, whose sales had reached 15,000 in the first three months after publication. But now Hemingway, the outsider, clearly in literary ascendance, was becoming acquainted with James' works; his artistic and personal recognition of James in future years was, for the most part, to take the form of a peculiar enmity. He was often to refer to James in highly derisive terms almost to the end of his own life. Hemingway's lese majeste towards him takes the form of a sporadic obsession that reveals more about Hemingway's maturity than James' imagined frailties.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 617: This bit of news is quite startling. It upsets half a century of scholarship that seems to have clearly shown James was a firm bachelor with a “low amatory coefficient,” as one of his doctors put it in 1905 in New York. But Holmes is not the only homosexual lover Novick claims for James. He also says that James had an affair with Paul Zhukovski, a Russian aristocrat James met in 1876 in the entourage of Ivan Turgenev.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 621:     Another bit of imaginative projection upon James’ life can be found in Ernest Hemingway’s letters. This novelist, on learning that Brooks had written that James was “prevented by an accident from taking part in the Civil War,” immediately incorporated this into his nearly finished novel, The Sun Also Rises. In Chapter 12, Jake Barnes refers to his World War I accident, and Gorton says, “That’s the sort of thing that can’t be spoken of. That’s what you ought to work up into a mystery. Like Henry’s bicycle.” Barnes replies it wasn’t a bicycle; “he was riding horseback.” (In his memoirs, James spoke of having had a “horrid” but “obscure hurt.” He had strained his back during a stable fire while serving as a volunteer fireman.) Hemingway had originally inserted James’ name in the novel, but Scribner’s editor, Maxwell Perkins, vetoed this. Hemingway insisted. They finally compromised on the “Henry” alone. F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote to Brooks, “Why didn’t you touch more on James’ impotence (physical) and its influence?” The castration theme was picked up by R.P. Blackmur, Glenway Wescott, Lionel Trilling, and F.O. Matthiessen in their critical writings.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 623:     What evidence does Novick offer for the James-Holmes “affair”? Just two French words James uses in his long and vivid notebook entry recalling his early days in Boston, where his family settled in a brick house in Ashburton Place near the State House. The words are l’initiation première–“first initiation.” In the entry, James is writing generally of the “rite of passage” that inaugurated his literary career. He describes the strong emotions he felt at the assassination of Lincoln (on James’$2 22nd birthday); how he wept when Hawthorne died; and the dawning sense of freedom experienced after the war’s end. He mentions also his first book review on English novel-writing, published in the North American Review, whose editors paid him $12, praised his writing, and asked for more. He does mention Holmes, but only to describe a brief visit he made to Holmes’ mother to ask how her son was faring in England, and his own fierce envy of Holmes for traveling abroad while James remained at home.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 625:     These larger emotions apparently do not touch the single-minded Novick. He is caught by l’initiation première. “The passage seems impossible to misunderstand,” he says. (For the full quote, which Novick does not provide,.) In a footnote, he asserts, “James had his sexual initiation in Cambridge and Ashburton Place.” A bit enigmatically, he also says, “[I]t would be fatal to expand on that in the book for which these are the [foot]notes.” We are left wondering why Novick thinks it would be “fatal” to have what would be a bit more evidence. And he still hasn’t named James’ partner. A sentence in which he appears to be rummaging around for explanations says that the companion “seems to be a veteran, an officer.” He adds, “Henry hinted he was Wendell Holmes.” But it is Novick who is doing the hinting. Holmes was a close friend of Henry’s brother, William. Henry looked at Holmes with a certain aloofness.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 627:     And then, Novick gives himself away. He writes in another footnote that Holmes was someone with whom James “might have been intimate.” “Might have been”? There’s incertitude for you. My surmise is that Novick is trying to support his hypothesis of James’ initial sexual experience, and that he picks the name handiest to him. Why not James’ closer friends, John LaFarge or Thomas Perry? Novick seems to want to link his two subjects. It is clear the homosexuality doesn’t bother him. He simply wants us to know that James was a sexual man and a loving person. Biographers often develop strange attachments to their subjects. (Indeed!)

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 629:     Novick’s second “case” is as flimsy as the first, but it has more documentation. It is based on James’ letters from Paris between 1875 and 1876. He has met Ivan Turgenev, the Russian master, and finds himself moving among assorted Russians. One of them is Paul Zhukovski, son of a Russian poet who tutored Alexander II when he was a prince. Reared in the royal court, Zhukovski is soft, dependent, spoiled, and weak-willed, but graceful and entertaining. James has never known any Russians, and Zhukovski becomes an agreeable companion; he is “picturesque,” and while James tells his parents that “human fellowship” is not his specialty, the two get along very comfortably. They dine with Turgenev, and with countesses, a duke, princesses. They make sorties into cabarets and cafes. James reports that he and Zhukovski have sworn “eternal fellowship.” One could read sex into this–as Novick does–but it sounds more like the drinking and singing that often takes place among young males, their swagger and “brotherhood.” At every turn, Novick introduces suggestions of a love affair.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 646: Book II comprises a sort of mid-book idyll. The author offers it to us by way of contrast to the Paris scenes that went before. In this novel, Pamplona will serve as a kind of anti-Paris, semi-rural and organic where the City of Light is urban and decadent. The woods outside Burguete where Kake and Bill fish for trout are even more different from Paris, and the sense of tranquility that the fishing trip creates in them and us could not be more different from the freneticism of the novel's opening chapters.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 648: Hemingway makes explicit here the themes of irony and pity: the irony of Kake's situation (he is a kind of superman who nevertheless can't perform the most basic of manly activities, namely fucking) as well as the pity "we" (who have our penises in working order) feel for him. The writer does so in an extended section, rich with dialogue, that is meant to be funny but has not dated well. The joking between Kake and Bill, over breakfast and later at lunch, is certainly believable as such, but it's difficult for a contemporary audience to follow, because the references to Frankie Fritsch and so forth have grown obscure with the passage of time. (The reference to Bryan's death tells us exactly when these scenes are occurring: 1925.) Do note, however, that Kake's physical condition is alluded to — and quickly backed away from. ("I'd a hell of a lot rather not talk about it" could be the motto of Kake's stoic take on the world, while Hemingway's would be "I want to talk about it all the time".) The writer has established, however, that Kake's condition is not simple impotence (rather it is loss of limb, or shortening of the joystick) and that it was caused by an accident.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 650: Another theme of Kake and Bill's banter concerns the latter's status as an expatriate. He has fled America, with its prudish Anti-Saloon League and bourgeois President Coolidge (who famously said "The business of America is business"). Finally, note the gruff tenderness shared by Kake and Bill in these scenes. One of Hemingway's pleasures in life as in art was what we now call "male bonding," and in this case the bonding is poignant, as in some ways it replaces the love that Kake cannot fully express with female companions. Haha, so you must mean dick, that's the only thing Bill has and they don't. 

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 652: More black humor: "Get up," Kake tells Bill, who replies "What? I never get up." Of course, it is Kake, not Bill, who never gets up. Later, trout (again, a phallic fish) try in vain to swim against the current of a waterfall, and — not so humorously — Kake reads a book about a man frozen inside a glacier whose wife awaits the reappearance of his body for twenty-four years. Kake is "frozen," too, only no one has the patience to await his unthawing.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 675: While you may not be able to talk to your chickens like Dr. Dolittle, after reading this article you will be able to understand the meanings of their sounds.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 678: This article is going to help you differentiate between the sounds and what the meaning behind them is. The first research was conducted in the 1980s by Nicholas E. Collias. This research became the building block for further research into chicken talk and cognition. Since then more than 24 sounds have been discovered and understood. Much more recent research at Macquarie University in Australia has uncovered not only chicken talk but cognitive abilities as well.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 691: If you have not heard the egg laying song then you do not keep chickens!

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 699: They will not give up the nest box to anyone.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 705: He will present the nest to her for inspection. If she likes it she will nest there, if not she will walk away.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 714: Young chicks do not have too much of a vocabulary but they can let you know how they feel by chirping. There are five distinct ways in which a chick can chirp:

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 733: Not all roosters do this – mine do not (perhaps he relies on me to do the head count). After I have done the head count I will tell them goodnight and some will answer with a soft clucking.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 735: This is not a frequent call you will hear.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 745: There are quiet breeds that do not make a lot of noise such as Australorps and Barred Rocks. Then there are the girls who cannot be quiet: Rhode Island Reds and Cornish.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 769: Thank you, really appreciated reading this. I am new to the chicken game and learning on a daily basis. Today one of mine was egg-bound, she seems fine now though and I saw her and another eating her egg yolk but I’m a bit concerned it broke insider her. If you have any advice, would love to know. I am googling and also likely to take to the vet on Monday (it is Saturday so vets not open). Thanks again, well written blog!  


xxx/ellauri179.html on line 772: Another Lin says: 

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 773:     Hello, loved this article. We have 1 chicken who gets a lot of human attention daily. We talk to her a lot. Just last week she was sunning herself at the window and sang a short song. We had never heard her sing before! It was almost like a magpie. We Googled to try locate other singing hens but could not find anything. She has yet to do it again. Have you ever come across this?  


xxx/ellauri179.html on line 777:     I have 3 Light Brahma girls..all seven months plus old, no eggs yet. Can I start feeding them layer feed now? They seem healthy and happy, just not laying. 


xxx/ellauri179.html on line 779:         It is not uncommon for them to wait until 7 months or so until the start laying. I would switch them to layer feed now.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 784: In Defense of Women is H. L. Mencken´s 1918 book on women and the relationship between the sexes. Some laud the book as progressive while others brand it as reactionary. While Mencken did not champion women´s rights, he described women as wiser in many novel and observable ways, while demeaning average men.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 793: In general, biographers describe Defense as "ironic": it was not so much a defense of women as a critique of the relationship between the sexes. Topics covered by the book included "Woman's Equipment," "Compulsory Marriage," "The Emancipated Housewife," and "Women as Martyrs." Women were gaining rights, according to Mencken—the ability to partake in adultery without lasting public disgrace, the ability to divorce men, and even some escape from the notion of virginity as sacred, which remained as "one of the hollow conventions of Christianity." Women nonetheless remained restrained by social conventions in many capacities.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 801: Mencken praised women, though he believed they should remain in the background of industry and politics. In personal letters especially, Mencken would write that women should appreciate men and do their best to support them. Although Mencken did not intend to demean women, his description of his "ideal scene" with a woman in the 1922 edition was not conventionally progressive:

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 803:     It is the close of a busy and vexatious day—say half past five or six o´clock of a winter afternoon. I have had a cocktail or two, and am stretched out on a divan in front of a fire, smoking. At the edge of the divan, close enough for me to reach her with my hands, sits a woman not too young, but still good-looking and well dressed—above all, a woman with a soft, low-pitched, agreeable voice. As I snooze she talks—of anything, everything, all the things that women talk of: books, music, the play, men, other women. No politics. No business. No religion. No metaphysics. Nothing challenging and vexatious—but remember, she is intelligent; what she says is clearly expressed... Gradually I fall asleep—but only for an instant... then to sleep again—slowly and charmingly down that slippery hill of dreams. And then awake again, and then asleep again, and so on. I ask you seriously: could anything be more unutterably beautiful?

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 823:     Our Lord Jesus Christ does not stand for peace at any price...Every true American would rather see this land face war than see her flag lowered in dishonor...I wish to say that, not only from the standpoint of a citizen, but from the standpoint of a minister of religion...I believe there is nothing that would be of such great practical benefit to us as universal military training for the men of our land.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 825: If by Pacifism is meant the teaching that the use of force is never justifiable, then, however well meant, it is mistaken, and it is hurtful to the life of our country. And the Pacifism which takes the position that because war is evil, therefore all who engage in war, whether for offense or defense, are equally blameworthy, and to be condemned, is not only unreasonable, it is inexcusably unjust. Sorry Christ, we gotta move on, that's how the cookie crumbles. Phil Roth's 2 Swedish sluts were just plain wrong, and so were you J.C.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 898: (which I know you will not),         				(vaikka tiedänkin ettet ota)			

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 954:    No! you won’t ’eed nothin’ else						Ei! et huoli muuta midiä		

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 970: Where there aren’t no Ten Commandments an’ a man can raise a thirst;	mis ei ole 10 käskyä vaan saman verran lupia, saa janottaa,	

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 984: Unquestionably, Ernest Hemingway was anti-Semitic. Studded throughout his letters are nasty remarks about Jews. But Hemingway felt his prejudice had a place in his fiction as well, most notably in “The Sun Also Rises,” his classic 1925 novel about a group of Paris expatriates at the bullfights in Pamplona.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 986:   Hemingway routinely describes Robert Cohn, introduced in the novel’s first lines as “the middleweight boxing champion of Princeton,” as a “kike” and a “rich Jew”; his obnoxiousness fuels the plot. (Cohn was based on Harold Loeb, a friend who gave Hemingway crucial support in getting his early work published; Hemingway could not forgive anyone who did him a good turn.) The anti-Semitic insult of writing a character like Cohn into his first major novel is breathtaking: it was not, like Hemingway’s letters, intended for private consumption only, but as characterization and a plot device in a work of fiction — a novel, as it turned out, written for the ages.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 988:   “The Sun Also Rises” is, for many readers, their introduction to Hemingway. It is taught in our schools. In writing it, Hemingway felt no need to censor himself, assuming, apparently, that readers shared his prejudice or at the very least did not object to it — indeed, that it added color to his story.

xxx/ellauri179.html on line 1038:   That seemed to handle it. That was it. Send a girl off with one man. Introduce her to another to go off with him. Now go and bring her back. And sign the wire with love. That was it all right. I went in to lunch.

xxx/ellauri186.html on line 74:   Henry Ward Beecher was the son of Lyman Beecher, a Calvinist minister who became one of the best-known evangelists of his era. Several of his brothers and sisters became well-known educators and activists, most notably Harriet Beecher Stowe, who achieved worldwide fame with her abolitionist novel Uncle Tom's Cabin. Henry Ward Beecher graduated from Amherst College in 1834 and Lane Theological Seminary in 1837 before serving as a minister in Indianapolis and Lawrenceburg, Indiana.

xxx/ellauri186.html on line 78:       After the war, Beecher supported social reform causes such as women's suffrage and temperance. He also championed Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, stating that it was not incompatible with Christian beliefs. He was widely rumored to be an adulterer, and in 1872 the Woodhull & Claflin's Weekly published a story about his affair with Elizabeth Richards Tilton, the wife of his friend and former co-worker Theodore Tilton. In 1874, Tilton filed charges for "criminal conversation" against Beecher. The subsequent trial resulted in a hung jury and was one of the most widely reported trials of the century. Tolstoi olisi ollut tyytyväinen siihen että syyllinen vapautettiin ja valamiehet hirtettiin.

xxx/ellauri186.html on line 81: Beecher married Eunice Bullard in 1837 after a five-year engagement. Their marriage was not a happy one; as Applegate writes, "within a year of their wedding they embarked on the classic marital cycle of neglect and nagging", marked by Henry's prolonged absences from home. The couple also suffered the deaths of four of their eight children.

xxx/ellauri186.html on line 83:       Beecher enjoyed the company of women, and rumors of extramarital affairs circulated as early as his Indiana days, when he was believed to have had an affair with a young member of his congregation. In 1858, the Brooklyn Eagle wrote a story accusing him of an affair with another young church member who had later become a prostitute. The wife of Beecher's patron and editor, Henry Bowen, confessed on her deathbed to her husband of an affair with Beecher; Bowen concealed the incident during his lifetime.

xxx/ellauri186.html on line 96:       At his best, Beecher represented what remains the most lovable and popular strain of American culture: incurable optimism; can-do enthusiasm; and open-minded, open-hearted pragmatism ... His reputation has been eclipsed by his own success. Mainstream Christianity is so deeply infused with the rhetoric of Christ's love that most Americans can imagine nothing else, and have no appreciation or memory of the revolution wrought by Beecher and his peers.

xxx/ellauri186.html on line 117: Ei ole, mutta onko pakko kaikki huonot vitsit kaivaa varastosta.

xxx/ellauri186.html on line 186:

A relatively small team of perhaps 50 people or fewer was led by a smaller cadre which probably included several lawyers and most definitely included tech experts. The smaller cadre formed some time around the impeachment and carefully recruited point people over the course of the following months. Working like terror cells, they would need to keep point people unaware of who else was in on the conspiracy, to protect plausible deniability as much as possible. They had to have at least one conspirator in the elections offices of key swing states. It wouldn’t need to be a high-profile elected official, and would no doubt be better if it were some nameless person that few people noticed or would suspect.

The fact that I am writing about this shows that this was not the perfect crime. The conspiracy was exposed though the conspirators have yet to be caught. My hunch is that it was a small group of colluders who tried to dupe many innocent people. A small size would explain why there are so many eyewitnesses who reported the signs of conspiracy, but we have yet to hear from a whistleblower who admits to being part of the plot. Being the middle or rear part of a human centipede makes whistling kinda hard.
ellauri065.html on line 580: Biden faces a creepy and slippery customer, especially if he gets inaugurated next month. While Trump may be facing thousands, perhaps millions of plaintiffs in incalculable civil and criminal cases. As these cases work their way slowly through the courts, freed from the rush of meeting stop-Biden deadlines, extensive evidence will be presented and courts will hear long and compelling testimony. All the while, Biden will have to carry on while millions across America think that somebody stole the White House for him. Millions of bucks are not going to save Trump from jail this time. Es schaun aufs Hakenkreuz voll Hoffnung schon Millionen. The knavishness dauert nur noch kurze Zeit.
ellauri065.html on line 611: Erikoisin väite kirjassa on näkemys siitä, että konservatiiveilla olisi Suomessa jotenkin vaikeaa. Kirjoittajat väittävät, että konservatiiviset (suomeksi sanottuna äärioikeistolaiset) ajatukset olisivat kiellettyjä, ja käsitys näkyy myös kirjan nimessä. Kuitenkin useimmat kirjan kirjoittajista ovat näkyviä kulttuurikeskustelijoita, joilla ei ole vaikeuksia saada sanomaansa julkisuuteen.
ellauri065.html on line 633: Groups that particpate are organized vigilante, cult style right-wing hate groups. Unfortunately, to make matters worse these groups are protected by police officers who are actually members of right wing extremist groups. Of coure not all police officers particpate, but rather than expose one of their own officers who are members or know these groups personally, they will remain silent. The officers who do particpate will go as far as making a victim appear insane or mentally ill to shut them up, and destroy that persons credibility so no one will be able to defend themselves. They do this by using the power of law enforcement, and taking a person against thier will, to a hospital that will give them a psychiatric exam. Corupt psychiatrist also lie, and cover up the crime as well. Now that they are powerless,noone will listen. Further destroying the targeted indviduals reputation.
ellauri065.html on line 698: Summa summarum kävi ilmi ettei Jaakolla ollut mitään omaa sanottavaa paizi se,
ellauri065.html on line 699: ettei sillä ole mitään omaa sanottavaa. Kaik on pelkkää Pynchon-coveria, netin kaiutusta, b-luokan filmikamaa, politiikkaklisheitä ja teinimeemejä, aakkossoppaa, väsymättömästi piissejä ja tägejä. Tän se sitten sanookin ääreist monisanaisesti lukemattomilla eri tavoilla. No mä oon kyllä tätä nyt ihan tavattomasti lukenut. Jokaikisen hämärän linkin olen klikannut. Ei tää ole romaani, tää on paperinen ylilauta. Tässä ei ole yhtään ihmistä, on vain puolituisia, pahvisia tuhatjalkasia ja puisevia liskoja. Nukkehallituxen naruja vetää aina se yx ja sama verijuotikas, kylmä imukala. Pynchonin ja Foster Wallacen imitaatiota puskadivarissa. Kaikki lainattua kuin Roope Ankan vaihtorottakonsiliolla. Loputonta läppää.
ellauri066.html on line 36: Kun syksyllä 1970 kirjoittauduin Helsingin yliopistoon opiskelemaan yleistä kirjallisuustiedettä ja estetiikkaa (se oli juuri vaihtanut nimensä estetiikasta ja nykyiskansain kirjallisuudesta) sekä sanskritia ja vertailevaa indoeurooppalaista kielitiedettä, saavuin keskelle vallankumousta. Päärakennuksen savuisessa ja hälisevässä ruokalassa (tupakointi oli vielä sallittu koko kahvilassa) istui radikaaliryhmiä rintamerkkeineen suunnittelemassa opetuksen uudistamista ja koko yliopiston suistamista elitistiseltä jalustaltaan palvelemaan kansan syvien rivien yhteiskunnallisia ja sivistystarpeita. Pitkätukkaisia, parrakkaita tai viiksekkäitä ja virttyneisiin villapaitoihin, samettitakkeihin tai liehuviin kauhtanoihin ja farkkuihin sonnustautuneita nuoria miehiä sekä ”let it all hang out” -tyyliin pukeutuneita naisia tuijottelivat hämmästyksen ja väliin kauhunkin vallassa minun kaltaiseni perinteiset opiskelijat, jotka koettivat sovitella lautasiaan pöydille monenmoisten lentolehtisten ja muiden painotuotteiden sekä kolhiintuneiden peltisten tuhkakuppien keskelle.
ellauri066.html on line 55: Kivennavalla daamit Keke ja Kati majoitettiin pihalle. Aamiaisen toi Paavolainen pukeutuneena hiljaisexi palvelijaxi vain pyyheliina suojanaan. Vinttikamariin oli rakennettu vanhoista verhoista itämainen teltta, jonka kahdenpuolen oli salin palmuista katkaistut lehdet. Lasse oli pyylevä bagdadilainen kauppias. Jylhän Ykälle pantiin musta vanne ja uumille värikäs pöytäliina. Pienet viixet ylähuulessa se näytti toreadorilta. Paavolainen oli pieni fauni puna-vihreissä sukkahousuissa pienet sarventyngät päässä. Ilmari Pimiä oli eunukki. Hänellä oli sen sijaan käyrä miekka, keihäs ja kilpi. Spriilamppuja ja suizukepilviä, seinäverhoissa osanottajien runoja, jotka he ize lausuivat. Jylhä esitti toreadoria. Paavolainen pani huimia hyppyjä ja säesti huilulla. Papittaren tanssin aikan paloi vaan yxi kynttilä, loppupeleissä sammutettiin sekin. Lopuxi kääriydyttiin vällyihin ja lähdettiin rekiretkelle. Paavolainen olisi halunnut olla miespääosassa, mutta Kati kannusti Ykää. Oli ilmeistä että nuoret runottaret eivät ollet immuuneja Jylhän munalle. Kekekin aivan sähköistyi Ykän silmistä, ne olivat kuin hindun silmät.
ellauri066.html on line 75: No, tiedä häntä, heilutatko koiraa, mutta luonnosta ja luonnossa olemisesta Vuorela perspiraationsa ammensi. Teokseen Runot (toinen, laajennettu painos; WSOY, 1979) on poimittu Vuorelan runoja yhdeksästätoista kokoelmasta, turhankin perusteellinen katsaus runoilijan tuotantoon siis.
ellauri066.html on line 77: Sanotaan, että runoilijaksi tulemiseen tarvitsee elää runoilijan elämä. Millainen sitten oli Vuorelan elämä, sitä en tiedä (aika lepposa, se oli onnellinen ukkomies ja samalla taputteli tuijunkantajien neitosia). Vaimon nalkuttaessa se runoili:
ellauri066.html on line 87: Jotkut Vuorelan runot ovat klassikoita jotka tuntuvat saaneen oman elämänsä, niillä on yleismaailmallista, tai sanoisiko suomalaiskansallista, pätevyyttä. Tällainen on Kaipaus:
ellauri066.html on line 167: Anekdootin mukaan Hellaakoski oli viimeisinä päivinään ennen sairaalaan lähtöä valmistanut kaksi pakettia, joista toinen piti luovuttaa arkistoitavaksi ja toinen hävittää. Ensin mainitussa paketissa sanotaan olleen Hellaakosken romaanikäsikirjoitus, toisessa roskakoripaskaa. Jostakin syystä paketit menivät kuitenkin sekaisin ja viimeistelemätön romaani tuli tuhotuksi. Paperikorin sisältöä ei tulisi tyhjentää, vain kierrättää. Mistkubel on modernisti Recycle bin.
ellauri066.html on line 179: Hän on valmis lyömään halolla kylmäkiskoista naista (runossa Tunnoton) tai potkimaan ärsyttäviä pikkukoiria (Koiranpennut). Miehiä hän suunnittelee tappavansa (Metsäkissa, Liian paha sappi) ja kertoo mielellään tarinoita dramaattisesta kuolemasta (Salakuljettaja) tai eläimellistä pureskelua sisältävistä tappeluista (Murha, Häpyä vailla).
ellauri066.html on line 205: Näin sanottuna se kuulostaa apinamaiselta. Säkeenylitys vähentää yxityisen säkeen koheesiovaikutelmaa. Tää taas kuulostaa izestäänselvyydeltä. Tää mun lähde ei tainnut olla mikään lavin opinnäyte. Jouko Heikkinen, Jyväskylän yliopisto 1999.
ellauri066.html on line 257: However, in scripture Rachel became fertile eventually and bore Jacob two biological children, Benjamin and Joseph. This aspect of the story, which is not in the show, actually makes Gilead's handmaid/forced surrogate system seem even more cruel and archaic and emphasizes even more the barbarity and evil of the despotic dogma that is the basis of the theocratic Gilead regime."
ellauri066.html on line 259: WHAT? You lost me here, you zealot fuckheads. Wow Peg you did not exaggerate a whit. You portray the puritans just the way they are.
ellauri066.html on line 302: “Älytöntä mätystystä” oli kuulemma Painovoiman sateenkaaren työnimi (osuva nimi kyllä). Nimi kuvaa toista Tompan tuotannon koukuttavaa piirrettä: sexiä, huumeita ja rokkia, ja muuta popsälää piisaa Tompalla. Pynchon on aina Pynchon, nää älyttömät mätystyxet on aina samanlaisia: orgioita, paskansyöntiä (joo selaa sinne kaikin mokomin, s. 308) sexin nimissä, kexittyjä huumeita, ja onnettomia lyriikoita (ei kaikki rock’n’rollia ikävä kyllä) joita sen hahmot pälähtää laulamaan kuin musikaalihahmot Broadwaylla. Vittu että jenkit on jenkkimäisiä, vaikka ne voissa paistaisi. (Jos et ole koskaan kuullut Amy Fisheristä, ei ylläri. Amy Elizabeth Fisher (s. 1974) on amerikkalainen nainen joka tuli kuuluisaxi 1992 Long Islandin Lolitana kun se 17-vuotiaana ampui pahasti Mary Jo Buttafuocoa joka oli sen luvattoman rakastajan Joey Buttafuocon puoliso. Oho! Kazo myös kuvat! Päästyään vankilasta 1999 Amysta tuli kirjailija, webimannekiini ja pornotähti. Kyllä kannatti.)
ellauri066.html on line 360: Is Pynchon’s equation of motion a standard differential equation used by specialists to calculate the path of a rocket’s flight or to control its yaw? No: Pynchon’s equation does not resemble anything one might reasonably expect. […] Not only are most of the symbols in Pynchon’s equation obscure, but the general structure of the terms in the equation also makes it impossible to identify with one or other of the equations describing the position and orientation of a rocket in flight. This equation, then, is not a genuine mathematical expression in this context. It may appear authoritative to the layperson, but it is unlikely to fool a rocket scientist. (Schachterle/Aravind, 2001: 162)...
ellauri066.html on line 366: To shorten a long story of searching for sources: the essay ‘The Control System of the V-2’ by Otto Müller includes an ‘equation for control in yaw’ (Müller, 1957: 90), and in exactly the same notation as Gravity’s Rainbow’s equation ‘describ[ing] motion under the aspect of yaw control’ (GR 284). We can conclude that this is the searched-for template for Pynchon’s Second Equation (see appendix, Figure 8). Müller’s paper is part of History of German Guided Missiles Development by Theodor Benecke and August W. Quick, published in 1957, which is based on the First Guided Missiles Seminar in Munich that took place a year earlier. The seminar was organised by the American Advisory Group for Aeronautical Research and Development (AGARD) to collect information about the V-2 from German scientists and engineers to use in American research on guided missiles. Pynchon might have had access to this book and further material on rocketry in the Boeing Company for which he worked as a technical writer in the early 1960s.
ellauri066.html on line 368: Moore’s intuition that Pynchon’s Second Equation is real proved to be correct, and he and his colleague correctly assign the angle ϕ to the orientational range of the rocket. But since they did not know that this formula is only one in a set of equations that describe the flight path, the orientation, and the steering of the V-2, the research team was misled in their interpretation of the other parameters and terms. With Müller’s paper, we can finally determine the meaning of each term and compare these with Pynchon’s reading. The first three terms refer, respectively, to the moments of inertia, of air resistance, and of lateral air impact when the rocket yaws, and the term on the right side of the equal sign represents the steering moment of the rudders (Müller, 1957: 90, 91; Kirschstein, 1951: 73, 74). In other words, the left-hand terms describe the orientation of the rocket during flight, which is influenced by external forces such as wind currents and air resistance.
ellauri066.html on line 470:

Usage notes

Gravity's Rainbow Plot Diagram

notation is_introduction_new">

Introduction

1
ellauri069.html on line 354: "They" suspect Slothrop's erections predict V-rockets.

notation is_rising_action_new">

Rising Action

2
ellauri069.html on line 359: Slothrop's personality is fully scattered.

notation is_climax_new">

Climax

7
ellauri069.html on line 360: Blicero fires the 00000 rocket with Gottfried inside.

notation is_falling_action_new">

Falling Action

8
ellauri069.html on line 361: The 00000 rocket begins its descent.

notation is_resolution_new">

Resolution

9
ellauri069.html on line 378: Nipistäjän novelli on paha lukea muistakin syistä—kaikki eivät kuumu sen paskajutuista, esimerkixi, toisille on luotaantyötävää sen pituus—TDLR, sivulta sivulle ja virkkeestä virkkeeseen saa olla kujalla kuin lumiukko tässä mitä on sanottu WWII:n jälkeen tärkeimmäxi Amerikan Novellix. Mikä näyttää olevan ongelman luonne? Mix näin muka piti kirjoittaa? Mihin tässä tähdätään, ja onxtää sittenkään niin hirveen hienoa? Hyviä kysymyxiä.
ellauri069.html on line 380: Sateenkaarinotko, on sanottava, vastaa näihin kysymyxiin vuolaasti—tässä novellissa on enemmän selfieitä kuin millään herutuskuvia jakavalla Instagrammiteinillä. Päähemmo, Alokas Laiskiais-Entropia, esitellään sen kirjoituspöytäsälällä; 50 sivua myöhemmin kuvataan samalla hartaudella sen mahalaukun sisältö kun se sukeltaa huuliharppunsa perään pönttöön Bostonissa miesten vessassa.
ellauri069.html on line 395: —the Pökler family, consisting of a rocket engineer father manipulated by the German government, a leftist mother protesting that government, and a daughter who may or may not have survived the camps, whom Pökler fucks with all the more merriment;
ellauri069.html on line 430: 90-luvun lopulla feministipiireissä alettiin huolestua siitä innosta, millä Saska Saarikoski -kaliiperin miehet lähti naisten asialle. Enste yleistettiin naisasia sukupuoliasiaxi ylipäänsä (sehän on miehiä aina kiinnostanut muutenkin). Sanottiin ettei ole tärkeetä mitä kullakin on jalkovälissä, kyllä miekkoset saa ja osaa olla naismaisia siinä missä naikkoset. Parhaat kokitkin on miehiä.
ellauri069.html on line 436: Thitshikov sanoo että liskovaltion ongelma on saada porukat kuolemaan sen puolesta. KILL! KILL! ei käy ennenkuin FUCK! FUCK!, muuten ei jää ketään jälelle. Six liskovaltion on saatava porukat uskomaan että KILL! KILL! edistää niiden FUCK! FUCK! senssejä. Minkä se tietysti tekikin vanhaan hyvään aikaan kuten esim. Valtaistuinpelissä. Riskit oli isoja, mut niin oli palkkiotkin laskettuna panotilaisuuxina.
ellauri069.html on line 455: Q: How can Gravity's Rainbow be so highly acclaimed when it makes not a lick of sense?
ellauri069.html on line 459: As my favourite English teacher in university used to say, “Stop it. Use your intelligence, not your attitude.” If the querent is seriously perplexed by the book, he might want to consult the Wikipedia article on it, which explains the book more or less adequately and also provides pointers to literature on the subject.
ellauri069.html on line 461: It may also be a good warm-up for the querent’s reading muscles to start with Pynchon’s earlier novel V, which is excellent in its own right, but not as extravagant as the even more brilliant Gravity’s Rainbow. It is V2, after all.
ellauri069.html on line 470: Much of the book is about the difficulty of living in the ubiquitous shadow of immanent, instant destruction. How do you live a life with anything like normalcy, if you know that at any moment a V2 rocket you won't hear coming could make that moment your last? Some fall to nihilist "mindless pleasures" (the novel's working title); some play power games; some withdraw from the world; some remain willingly oblivious. Normalcy turns out not to be an option.
ellauri069.html on line 483: An article recently came out in the LA Times about Pynchon’s Great American Novel. The article begins by stating that Mason and Dixon is actually the most obvious candidate for the Great American Novel, and it instead suggests that Gravity’s Rainbow is perhaps the Great European Novel. The article then questions whether or not the Great American Novel even exists, and if it does if it is of a singular form or if it takes on many forms at once. After considering this question, the article finally claims that the Great American Novel is actually made up of all of Pynchon’s works fused together “into one epic Pynchoverse.” The Great American Novel certainly does not need to take place in America, but still many will argue that Gravity’s Rainbow by itself can never be considered as the Great American Novel because of its non-American setting and its wide array of characters. This is definitely debatable, but I do enjoy the idea of a “Pynchoverse” or a Pynchon Compilation being considered as the true Great American Novel. That being said, I do think most readers and Pynchonerds would undoubtedly say that Gravity's Rainbow is the Greatest Pynchon Novel.
ellauri069.html on line 493: Between 1987 and 2018, I made several runs at the book, but got inextricably bogged down in the prose, often giving up when the book did not yield easy rewards for the reader. I tried hard to let the reading “wash over me” but I always put the book down, never to pick it up again.
ellauri069.html on line 497: I suspect I would need to read it a few more times to really “get” it. I’d prefer an eBook with deep annotations into the Gravity's Rainbow Wiki
ellauri069.html on line 498: . I presume I should have done a bunch of pre-reading research before reading the book, but that’s not how I roll.
ellauri069.html on line 574: And now, The Romance of Helen Trent, the real-life drama of Helen Trent, who, when life mocks her, breaks her hopes, dashes her against the rocks of despair, fights back bravely, successfully, to prove what so many women long to prove, that because a woman is 35 or more, romance in life need not be over, that romance can begin at 35.
ellauri069.html on line 582: A year later, their daughter, Laurel, is born. To Stella's great surprise, she discovers she has a strong maternal instinct. Even when she is out dancing and partying, she cannot help but think about her child. As Laurel grows up, Stella's ambition and scheming to rise socially is redirected to her daughter.
ellauri069.html on line 584: Later, Laurel and Richard get married. Stella watches them exchange their wedding vows from the city street through a window. Her presence goes unnoticed in the darkness and among the other curious bystanders. She then slips away in the rain, alone but triumphant in having arranged her daughter's happiness.
ellauri069.html on line 752: Lännen ilkeä noita näkee matkustajat lähestymässä yhdellä teleskooppisilmällään. Se lähettää susilauman repimään ne kappaleixi, mutta Tölkki Puumies tappaa ne kirveellään (Hyvä Puumies! Kaada vielä puutkin! huutaa Haju Pisilä kazomosta). Se lähettää parven villivarizia nokkimaan niiltä silmät, mutta Varixenpelätti tappaaa ne vääntämällä niiltä niskat nurin (Hyvä Pelätti! Näytä niille linnuille! huutaa valkoposkihanhinuiverot.) Se kuzuu parven mustia mehiläisiä pistämään niitä, mutta ne kuolevat kun ne yrittävät pistää Tölkki Puuumiestä sillä aikaa kun Varixenpelättimen oljet piilottavat muut osanottajat. (Hyvä puumaamiehet! huutaa Suomen Keskusta.) Hän lähettää tusinan Kulliorjiaan hyökkäämään niiden kimppuun, mutta Leijonalla seisoo jäykkänä ja torjuu ne. Loppuviimexi se käyttää Kultaisen Lippixensä voimaa ja lähettää Siipiapinat sieppaamaan Dorothyn, Toton, ja Leijonan, tyhjentämään Varixenpelättimen oljista, ja lommottamaan Tölkki Puumiehen. Dorothyn on pakko tulla noidan henk.koht. sexiorjaxi, sillä aikaa kun noita suunnittelee sen hopeakenkien varastamista.
ellauri069.html on line 783: Other putative allegorical devices of the book include the Wicked Witch of the West as a figure for the actual American West; if this is true, then the Winged Monkeys could represent another western danger: Indigenous peoples of the Americas. The King of the Winged Monkeys tells Dorothy, "Once we were a free people, living happily in the great forest, flying from tree to tree, eating nuts and fruit and doing just as we pleased without calling anybody master. ... This was many years ago, long before Oz came out of the clouds to rule over this land."
ellauri069.html on line 785: In fact, Baum proposed in two editorials he wrote in December 1890 for his newspaper, the Saturday Pioneer, the total genocidal slaughter of all remaining indigenous peoples. "The Whites," Baum wrote, "by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians. Why not annihilation?"
ellauri070.html on line 32: Sateenkaarinotkon Osan 4 motto on
ellauri070.html on line 58: The Mendoza RM2 was a light machine gun similar to the M1918 BAR manufactured in Mexico by Productos Mendoza, S.A.. Rafael Mendoza have been producing machine guns for the Mexican Army since 1933 and all have been noted for their lightness, simplicity, ease of maintenance, and economic construction without sacrificing reliability.
ellauri070.html on line 81: We learn that Cole Porter was notoriously promiscuous and loved giving head to young Marines. Tyrone Power, also an ex-Marine, was bisexual but preferred male sexual partners.
ellauri070.html on line 86: Audrey Hepburn is not related to Katherine Hepburn. It has been a persistent misconception since Audrey came to prominence in the 1950s. Katharine was the daughter of two wealthy Connecticut Americans; Audrey the daughter of Dutch nobility.
ellauri070.html on line 222: sagt sie, ein Großes Geschlecht, einmal, wir Klagen. Die Väter se kerskuu, kerran suurikin heimo, me ruinot. Oli Ukkelit
ellauri070.html on line 322: Sateenkaarinotko lähestyy loppua. Siv. 852 on ekan kerran jotain aikuisvakavaa keskustelua kahden kesken Katkeron ja Katin välillä. 2 hyljättyä rakastajaa natustaa vanhaa purukumia. Jotain hyvin epäaitoa tässä on. Pientä narsismin makua on purkassa. Ei liikkistä vaan jotensakin mautonta. Onkohan se tarkoitus? Ota Nipsusta nyt selvää. Ei se niin hyvä kirjailija ole.
ellauri070.html on line 325: "Entäs minä? " koittaa Katje "lohduttaa". Aika narsistista osanottoa. "Sinä Katje raukka. Sinun tarinasi on surullisin kaikista. Sinut on vain vapautettu tehtävistäsi. You're FIRED." Deuteragonistit agonisoivat puisevasti näin.
ellauri070.html on line 340: In Jewish Kabbalistic cosmology of Isaac Luria, the qlippot are metaphorical "shells" surrounding holiness. They are spiritual obstacles receiving their existence from God only in an external, rather than internal manner. Divinity in Judaism connotes revelation of God's true unity, while the shells conceal holiness, as a peel conceals the fruit within. They are therefore synonymous with idolatry, the root of impurity through ascribing false dualism in the Divine, and with the Sitra Achra (סטרא אחרא "Other Side"), the perceived realm opposite to holiness. They emerge in the descending seder hishtalshelus (Chain of Being) through Tzimtzum (contraction of the Divine Ohr), as part of the purpose of Creation. In this they also have beneficial properties, as peel protects the fruit, restraining the Divine flow from being dissipated. Kabbalah distinguishes between two realms in qlippot, the completely impure and the intermediate.
ellauri070.html on line 370: Mirandan albumeja myytiin yli kymmenen miljoonaa. 1940-luvulla hänen vieraillessaan Brasiliassa häntä arvosteltiin ankarasti amerikkalaiselle kaupallisuudelle antautumisesta sekä vääristyneen Brasilia-kuvan esittämisestä. Hän vastasi laululla ”Disseram Que Eu Voltei Americanizada” (”Sanotaan, että palasin amerikkaistuneena”). Arvostelujen vuoksi hän pysytteli poissa Brasiliasta 14 vuotta. Miranda mm. esiintyi Disneyn vitun läpinäkyvässä latinojen kosiskelufilmissä Tres Caballeros maailmansodan lopussa 1944.
ellauri070.html on line 372: Miranda oli hyvin pienikokoinen nainen. Hän pyrki kätkemään tämän käyttämällä korkeita korkoja ja valtavan kokoisia hedelmäkasoin tai liioitellun kokoisin yksittäisin hedelmin koristettuja hattuja. Kun muuan toimittaja kysyi Mirandalta, mistä hän hankkii nämä erikoiset hattunsa, hän vastasi tekevänsä ne itse. Samanlaisia hattuja käytti kassikotkilla lennähtelevät kääpiöt Sateenkaarinotkossa. Nekin olivat hyvin lyhyitä, kuin Munchkin-filmitähtiä. Onkohan Nipsu hukkapätkä sekin? Kärsiiköhän se siitäkin? A man of constant sorrow niinkuin Emry Arthur. (Note)
ellauri070.html on line 400: Nipsun kirjan nimi Sateenkaarinotko tarkoittaa takuulla LGBT pyllyvakoa. Siinä on kosolti vakavaa ja vallatonta fiilistä. Tai siis hulvatonta hauskanpitoa kyynel silmänurkassa. Ilo pintaan vaik syän märkänis. Runkku piristää kun on allapäin. Homopropelli pyörittää lokia Anubis-laivan vantaalla.
ellauri070.html on line 451:

Does not know shit from Shinola

ellauri070.html on line 473: Yx juttu on nyt sanottava Pynchonista: se on parhaimmillaan ympäristöjen kuvaajana: säiden, rakennusten, taivaan, mezänreunojen ja pilvien. Six varmaan musta tää kirjan loppupuoli on ihan parasta. Vähemmän typeriä salaliittojuonia ja sääliä herättävää slapstickia, joka ei naurata kuin sitä sananlaskunomaista raitapyllyistä paviaania. Schlumpf maleximassa pitkin sodanjälkeisiä sakemanneja ja vaan kazelemassa paikkoja kuin Kim Jong Il. Siinä sitä jotakin on.
ellauri071.html on line 32: Nonsense does not win sense, sense does not win law, law does not win right, right does not win heaven
ellauri071.html on line 40: Kenosha Kid: Thomas Pynchon's novel Gravity's Rainbow possesses an image which has intrigued readers of the novel since its introduction. Many readers come away from the novel failing to find the answer to one question: What is the Kenosha Kid? Critics have argued about the identity of the Kenosha Kid. Some have argued that it does not really exist. Instead, it is only the result of Tyrone Slothrop´s hallucinations brought on by sodium amytal (or "truth serum"). Ironically, the idea that the Kenosha Kid comes out during a dose of "truth serum" proves to be even more confusing for readers (given it may or may not really exist). Other critics have denoted the Kenosha Kid as a dance (likening it to the "Charleston" or the "Big Apple" dances).
ellauri071.html on line 44: Tucker Carlson Justifies Kenosha Shootings: Vigilante Kid Did What ‘No One Else Would’ AND THERE IT IS “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” Carlson asked his viewers on Wednesday night. “Our leaders want us to believe this is a racial conflict, they’re always telling us it is. They’re lying. It is not a racial conflict,” Carlson grumbled, adding: “This is not a race war. This is a class war.” Updated Aug. 27, 2020 5:20AM ET / Published Aug. 26, 2020 9:11PM ET
ellauri071.html on line 80: "Little sigma, times P of s equals one over the square root of two pi, times e to the minus s squared over two little-sigma squared" would be the probability density function for a Normally Distributed random variable with mean zero and standard deviation little sigma (though here the traditional form has been multiplied through by little sigma, probably to make it easier for Roger to say). But this is "P of s-over-little-sigma" - a reference to things not being quite Normal?
ellauri071.html on line 101: He did not publicly acknowledge his homosexuality, but it was discussed candidly after his death by biographers including Graham Payn, his long-time partner, and in Coward's diaries and letters, published posthumously.
ellauri071.html on line 105: In 1924, Coward achieved his first great critical and financial success as a playwright with The Vortex. The story is about a nymphomaniac socialite and her cocaine-addicted son (played by Coward). Some saw the drugs as a mask for homosexuality; Kenneth Tynan later described it as "a jeremiad against narcotics with dialogue that sounds today not so much stilted as high-heeled".
ellauri071.html on line 112: Design for Living, written for Alfred Lunt and Lynn Fontanne, was so risqué, with its theme of bisexuality and a ménage à trois, that Coward premiered it in New York, knowing that it would not survive the censor in London.
ellauri071.html on line 121: Another of Coward's wartime projects, as writer, star, composer and co-director (alongside David Lean), was the naval film drama In Which We Serve. The film was popular on both sides of the Atlantic, and he was awarded an honorary certificate of merit at the 1943 Academy Awards ceremony. Coward played a naval captain, basing the character on his friend Lord Louis Mountbatten.
ellauri071.html on line 125: In his Middle East Diary Coward made several statements that offended many Americans. In particular, he commented that he was "less impressed by some of the mournful little Brooklyn boys lying there in tears amid the alien corn with nothing worse than a bullet wound in the leg or a fractured arm". After protests from both The New York Times and The Washington Post, the Foreign Office urged Coward not to visit the United States in January 1945. He did not return to America again during the war.
ellauri071.html on line 220: Junior G-Men was an American counterpart to Hitler Jugend, a boys club and popular culture phenomenon during the late 1930s and early 1940s that began with a radio program and culminated with films featuring the Dead End Kids. After leaving the Federal Bureau of Investigation and a brief stint in Hollywood, Melvin Purvis hosted a children's radio program called "Junior G-Men" in 1936. Purvis had become a national hero for his record as an FBI agent during the so-called "war on crime" in the early 1930s, most notably for leading the manhunt that ended with the death of John Dillinger. As a result of this fame, Purvis was seen as a real-life counterpart to the fictional detectives, such as Dick Tracy, that proliferated in the popular culture targeting boys during this period. As part of the radio program, listeners could join a "Junior G-Men" club and receive badges, manuals, and secret agent props. Shortly thereafter, Purvis became the face of breakfast cereal Post Toasties promotional detective club. The cereal company's fictional "Inspector Post" and his "Junior Detective Corps" metamorphosed into an image of Purvis inviting boys and girls to become "secret operators" in his "Law and Order Patrols."
ellauri071.html on line 252: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle i}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 261: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle i}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 270: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle j}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 279: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle k}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 297: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle t+xi+yj+zk}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 306: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle t}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 315: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle x}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 324: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle y}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 333: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle z}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 342: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle i}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 351: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle j}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 360: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle k}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 398: notation encoding="application/x-tex">{\displaystyle i^{2}=j^{2}=k^{2}=ijk=-1\,}notation>
ellauri071.html on line 403: Kvaternionit jäivät pitkäksi aikaa vektorilaskennan varjoon, ja vasta viime aikoina Hamiltonin elämäntyö on löydetty uudelleen. Nykyisin kvaternionien algebraa käytetään mm. avaruustekniikassa, robotiikassa, ydinfysiikassa ja tietokonegrafikassa. Kvaternionit ovat vektoriavaruuxia yleisempiä struktuureita. Ne eivät ole enää kuntia, vaan normitettuja jakoalbegroja (normed division algebra, en ole varma suomennoksesta). Niin sanottu karvapallolause (hairy ball theorem) sanoo, että ei ole olemassa kolmiuloitteista reaalinormista algebraa.
ellauri071.html on line 405: Tosta karvapallolauseesta ei Pynchonilla varmaan ollut tietoa, muuten se olisi takuulla maininnut sen Sateenkaarinotkossa. Se olis just sen tapaista. Manikealaiset (joista on ollut puhetta jo toisaalla) näkevät 2 rokettia, hyvän ja pahan, hyvä vie meidät tähtiin ja pahalla maailma tekee izemurhaa. Sama roketti se on, ja lähettäjät on samoja pahoja.
ellauri071.html on line 441: Sateenkaarinotkon S. 948. noitatyttö Emätin-Geeli muka "laukeaa" laittamatta edes sormia liipasimelle, vaan kun se ajattelee tota vanhaa Tshitshikov-ukkelia. Älä unta nää Nipsutin. Hemmetti nää sedät on sit vitun ällöjä. Nyt taas näyttää uskottavalta että Tompalla oli joku neekeriottoveli Katkero jolle se oli katkera kun äiti tykkäs siitä enemmän. Ylläri.
ellauri071.html on line 554: Netzach is the sephirah 'victory', the ability of raw, emotional, passionate energy to overcome obstacles, but it needs to be balanced by Hod, the ability to rationalize and exercise a degree of self-control. If it is not balanced it becomes uncontrolled passion, desire, greed and covetousness, the dark side of Venus, which is unbridled lust. Never underestimate it, anyway.
ellauri071.html on line 556: Yesod on tämmönen välittäjä, joka ruiskauttaa jumalan voiman johkin perseeseen. Niinpä Yesod liittyy sukupuolielimeen (tietysti miehiseen). Malkuth alhaalla on se naispuolinen perse. Kristityt liittää Yesodin pyhän kolminaisuuden kolmanteen jäseneen, siihen kondominnäköiseen. Sehän se Mariankin pani paxuxi. (I´m not the father, sanovat isä & poika viattoman näköisinä kuorossa.)
ellauri071.html on line 565: The Qliphoth of Hod, similarly is founded on the idea of a radiating object: our eyes are blinded and cannot look behind the radiating surface. Unauthentic brilliance can be understood as the beginning of illusion and deceit. In the realm of the mind the shadow of Hod therefore is represented by the lie, artfulness or beguilement. At the same time the demon of Hod correlates to the ideas of fickleness, hesitation and lack of determination - the negative fluctuations of our mind. The Qliphoth of Hod is called ‘Samael‘ which can be translated as ‘The Deceitful Ones‘ (german, ‘Die Täuscher’, kr. diabolos) or ‘Poison of God’ (german, ‘Das Gift Gottes’).
ellauri072.html on line 155: Akutagawa syntyi Tokiossa maitomiehen poikana. Hän sai lisänimen Ryūnosuke, ”Lohikäärmeen poika”, koska hänen sanottiin syntyneen lohikäärmeen vuonna 1892, lohikäärmeen kuussa, lohikäärmeen päivänä lohikäärmeen tuntina. Asiasta ei kuitenkaan ole varmuutta, sillä tallessa ei ole syntymätodistusta, josta Akutagawan tarkka syntymäaika ilmenisi. Hän kasvoi enonsa perheessä ja sai siksi äitinsä tyttönimen Akutagawa. Eliskä siis maitomies käväistessään enolassa täytteli muutakin kuin pulloja.
ellauri072.html on line 190: Sexiskandaalit ravistavat katolista kirkkoa vähän väliä. Ongelma on se, että samansukuisten ja alimittaisten apinoiden hypistely on vain luonnollista, mutta katolinen kirkko on luonnoton, kun se kieltää sen pappiraukoilta. Ei riitä ettei ne saa bylsiä, pikku pippeleiden tafsauskin on tabu. Se on julma ja epätavallinen rangaistus.
ellauri072.html on line 198:

Eleven! Please repeat that. Beatrice does not get it. Dante and Vergilius get quite pissed.
ellauri072.html on line 206: What has gone mainly unnoticed in the various discussions of the problem is something that has puzzled me for some time. Why does Dante treat the homosexual Florentines in Inf. 16 with greater respect than any other infernal figures except those in Limbo? I do not have an answer to that question, but would like to bring it forward. Let me begin with Purg. 26. We have probably not been surprised enough at Dante's insistence that roughly half of those who sinned in lust, repented, and were saved (and are now on their way to that salvation) were homosexual. It would have been easy for him to have left the homosexuals out of Purgatory, and it is hard to imagine an early (or a later) commentator who would have objected to the omission, especially since, in Hell, homosexuality is treated, not as a sin of the flesh, but as one of violence against nature. However, for a unique instance of a commentator who is aware of Dante's unusual gesture see Trifon Gabriele on Inf. 15.46: "Non e' dubbio che 'l Poeta vuol applaudere a questo vitio quanto egli puo'. Puopa hyvinkin. Ecco, gli fa parlare di belle cose e gli fa tutti grand'uomini nelle lettere e nell'arme e nella religione, e finalmente non e' peccato ne l'Inferno o Purgatorio che egli men danni con le parole sue che questo; anzi lo polisce quanto puo' con suoi versi".
ellauri072.html on line 208: This surprising, even shockingly "liberal" view of homosexual love as being the counterpart of the heterosexual kind should cause more notice than it generally does; perhaps even greater surprise should attend the extraordinarily generous gestures made toward the three Florentine homosexual politicians, Iacopo Rusticucci, Guido Guerra, and Tegghiaio Aldobrandi, whom we encounter in Inf. 16. They are presented as being among the most admirable figures in Hell. Let us examine the scene briefly. Virgil, who so often warns Dante when the latter begins to admire or become sympathetic (or overly concerned with) the damned, here is urgent in his approbation of these three sinners: "a costor si vuole esser cortese." This is the only time in Hell in which cortesia is mentioned as a fitting response to the damned except for Beatrice's and Dante's use of "cortese" for Virgil (Inf. 2.58, 2.134). The following tercet only emphasizes the guide's appreciation of their worthiness.
ellauri072.html on line 213: Leaving Dante and Virgil, the sinners vanish so quickly that "Un amen" could not be uttered in so little time. That Dante should turn to the language of prayer for his comparison, notwithstanding the proverbial and popular origins of the phrase, probably also reflects on the esteem that he felt and continues to feel for the three Florentines. It is a rare thing in the Inferno to find a moment in which the pilgrim, the poet, and the guide are all in absolute agreement, and certainly with respect to the human worth of sinners.
ellauri072.html on line 216: As we see in Inferno 15-16, in Hell Dante damns sodomites as sinners of violence against nature. Nonetheless, even in his Hell, where Dante does not go so far as to include homosexuals as unrepentant lustful in the second circle, he still desexualizes his treatment of sodomy. What do we learn from all this? Yet the fact that here, as in Purg. 26, he chooses to put homosexuals in a good light when there was no apparent compelling reason for him to do so surely should cause us to ask further questions about Dante's views concerning homosexuality. Varmaan se oli homo izekin, Beatrice or no Beatrice. Sixkai sille riitti vaan ulista siitä Beatricesta. Satis enim dictum erat de tam obscena et tam spurca materia.
ellauri072.html on line 236: Hän tapasi myös kirjan kirjoittamisen aikoihin nuoren leikkaussalihoitajan Eleonore Schwindtin ja he menivät naimisiin vuonna 1947 ja heille syntyi tytär Gabriele saman vuoden joulukuussa. Vuonna 1995 Frankl vastaanotti Wienin kaupungin kunniakansalaisen nimityksen. Lisäksi hän oli 29 yliopiston kunniatohtori muun muassa Yhdysvalloissa, Tšekissä, Unkarissa ja Israelissa.
ellauri072.html on line 248: - Eikö se nyt kuitenkin näytä toimivan juuri päinvastoin? Se johtaa kaikkea sitä mistä sen izensä sanotaan koostuvan, vastustaa sitä lähes kaikessa koko elämän ajan ja hallizee sitä kaikin tavoin, toisinaan kurittaen sitä ankarammin ja vaivojen avulla, esimerkixi urheilun ja lääkintätaidon alalla, toisinaan lempeämmin, puhutellen ruumiin haluja, kiihkoja ja pelkoja uhkaavaan tai varoittavaan sävyyn, niinkuin ize olisi vieras kaikelle tälle. Näin Homeroskin esittää asian Odysseiassa, kun hän sanoo Odysseuxesta:
ellauri072.html on line 312: "Normaalisti" katsoja teeskentelee niinkuin vaikka kazoessaan Matti Nykästä hiihtomäessä, että aamulliset tapahtumat tosiaan tapahtuvat just nyt jossakin Garmisch-Partenkirchenissä eikä tossa mv-hölmöpöntössä 2m päässä, ja ruudun pikku-ukot ovat todellisia henkilöitä, katsojan vain tarkkaillessa tapahtumia Itävallassa ”neljännen seinän” läpi. Jotta katsojalle jää tämä neljännen seinän illuusio, Matti ei myöskään noteeraa tv-kuvaajaa vaan teeskentelee, ettei sitä ole olemassa. Niinkuin se kisan jälkeen sitten teeskentelee, että joku muu ihminen kazoo sitä sieltä kameran perssilmästä, kun se mainostaa Atom-merkkisiä suxia. Eihän se sille kameramiehelle niitä kaupittele. Ei se oikeasti kaupittele niitä kellekään, se vaan tekee mitä sen on tehtävä että se saa suxivalmistajalta pätäkkää.
ellauri072.html on line 325: Eri rahan käytön kohteita ja rahan lähteitä kutsutaan tileiksi. Tiliä voidaan havainnoillistaa niin sanotulla tiliristikolla, jossa tilin vasenta puolta kutsutaan nimellä debet ja oikeaa puolta nimellä kredit. Debet on ikkunan puolella. Debetiin merkitään aina rahan käyttö ja kreditiin vastaavan taloudellisen tapahtuman rahan lähde, jolloin rahan käytön summa on aina sama kuin rahan lähteenkin, jos kirjanpidossa ei ole tehty virheitä.
ellauri072.html on line 327: Kaxinkertaiseen kirjanpitoon kirjattava meno syntyy samalla hetkellä kun yrityksen tuotannontekijä otetaan vastaan. Esimerkiksi ravintolalle syntyy meno samalla hetkellä kun se vastaanottaa keittiöön vihanneslähetyksen. Vihanneslähetyksen maksaminen viikkoa myöhemmin ei enää synnytä menoa, se on rahoitustapahtuma.
ellauri072.html on line 330: Yxinkertainen kirjanpito on aina maksuperusteista eli menot ja tulot kirjataan sille päivälle, jona maksu tapahtuu. Tilikausi on kalenterivuosi.
ellauri072.html on line 429: Esim ajatus että tyyppi tekee "hyvän teon" antamalla rahaa köyhille eikä sitä saa muuten kertoa muuten se menee pilalle, on hemmetin feikkiä, puhdasta amerikkalaista charity-hanuria. Ja se että kuitenkin pitäis saada noilta köyhiltä vielä kiitosta on samasta hanurista. Ylipäänsä kiitosten odottelu mistään on. Siinä on kyse siitä samasta luotonannosta ja IOU:n kuittauxesta kuin kaikessa muussakin bisnesjeesustelussa. Tätä on vaikea pitää mielessä, mutt näinhän se on. Se mitä näissä yhteyxissä sanotaan "hyväxi" on justiinsa vaan tota tiimikäytöstä. Tiimitoiminta ON termiittiapinoiden hyvyyttä, tit for tat tiimin tasolla on sen hyvän määritelmä pähkinänkuoressa.
ellauri072.html on line 443: Hallizijan tarkoitus on pitää hopeaselät pois toistensa turkista ja toimia vähäosaisten roolimallina. Vaalien tarkoitus on vaihtaa miehitystä määrävälein ja kammeta vanhat kannot ulos. Samaa tarkoitusta palvelevat organisaatiouudistuxet.
ellauri072.html on line 482:

Another Ashkenazi Jew

ellauri072.html on line 493: You begin to ask yourself if the liking or not liking of the author as a person is really interesting or illuminating, aesthetically or ethically, as a dominant question.
ellauri072.html on line 501: Wallace has given as much to literature as any contemporary American writer. Whether you like him or not, you hear American language, and experience American thinking, differently because of him. Wallace’s oeuvre is internally varied but also of a piece.
ellauri072.html on line 508: Infinite Jest is not the only thing that made Wallu famous, though. There was also his bandanna, which was as misinterpreted as so much else about him. As the Max biography explains, Wallace started wearing the bandanna as the least embarrassing solution he could think of to obscure the intense sweating attacks that overcame him without warning. (In high school, he had taken to carrying around a tennis racket and a towel as a tacit cover story for the sweating.) The acutely self-conscious, anxious, addicted and at times showy characters in Wallace’s fiction were not, Max helps us recognize, wildly difficult for Wallace to imagine — the characters were iterations of himself.
ellauri072.html on line 512: Wallace had lifelong troubles not only with anxiety but also with alcohol, anger, impulsiveness, obsessive love, pursuit of rejection, extreme self-consciousness, abysses of depression and lying even more than the rest of us.
ellauri072.html on line 516: Any diagnoses seem as unilluminating as saying that the “reason” someone is short is because he is 5-foot‑1. About Wallace’s problems it seems worth noting simply that his A.A. attendance coincided with a long period of relative wellness, and that getting off the antidepressant Nardil, which he had taken most of his adult life, coincided with a serious crash in mood that ended in his suicide six months later.
ellauri072.html on line 520: The externals of Wallace’s life are not too distinctive. He was a smart kid raised in a middle-class family in Urbana, Ill.; his mother was an English teacher and his father a professor of philosophy. Wallace attended Amherst, where he first had trouble fitting in and then found a niche where he fit in very well. He had some intense and dramatic long-term relationships with women and also his share of brief sexual encounters, and he eventually had what is said to have been a loving and grounded marriage. It is his internal agitations, not his circumstances, that were extreme.
ellauri072.html on line 536: Wallace’s fiction is, in its attentiveness and labor and genuine love and play, very nice. But what is achieved on the page, if it is achieved, may not hold stable in real life. As another dangerously romanticizeable suicide, Heinrich von Kleist, once said: “It is not we who know but rather a certain state of mind in us that knows.” And one is not always in the same state of mind.
ellauri072.html on line 540: Another thing, perhaps more powerful, that detains people at the niceness question has to do, I think, with competitiveness. Readers are correct to sense, in Wallace’s elaborate grammars and data fields, not only a generous show but also a tacit petition for our recognition of his intellect. This really annoys some people.
ellauri072.html on line 548: But yes, Wallace was extremely competitive, even to the point of competing about not being competitive. One of the wincing pleasures of Max’s biography is reading excerpts from Wallace’s correspondence, especially with his close friend and combatant Jonathan Franzen, but also with just about every white male writer he might ever have viewed as a rival or mentor. Aggressive self-abasement, grandstanding, veiled abuse, genuine thoughtfulness, thin-skinned pandering — it’s all there. As the correspondents compete about who is making genuine human connections and who and what is really nice and good, they seem to be in some realm far from most kinds of human connection save for that of heated testosteronic battle.
ellauri072.html on line 552: In this bizarre arena, niceness becomes just one more mode of competition, thereby undermining itself. Supposedly. But not really.
ellauri072.html on line 553: Because, in their attentiveness to one another, and to literature, they are, even in their bizarre, distorted-by-self ways, generating niceness and even, in important ways, being nice to one another. The fuel may be toxic, but the engine converts it.
ellauri072.html on line 558: It’s not unlike the way Wallace turned a major problem with distraction — you will be amazed by his television watching — into an ability to follow out a thought or topic farther than almost anyone else.
ellauri072.html on line 562: One of the main criticisms of Wallace’s work is that he simply mirrored decay and malaise instead of moving through and beyond them. This was, not infrequently, one of his own main concerns. But the more nattering and pervasive complaint, which takes on more dimension in Max’s biography, is that he is just too brainy and aggressively difficult — just too, well, mean.
ellauri072.html on line 566: Let’s disagree. Wallace’s writing is not as difficult to read as it is famed to be, nor as pandering to entertain as he worried it was. Wallace writes in grammatically correct sentences; he tells jokes; and his work, if you are wired a certain way, will affect you emotionally.
ellauri072.html on line 630: After an argument with Susan on the night of January 31, 1984, Susan told Wallace to move out the next day. After Susan, Anna and Gabe left the next day, Wallace did not leave, and instead stayed in the house and decided to kill them.
ellauri072.html on line 634: When she arrived 2 hours later, she asked him why he had not left as she had requested. He followed her into the kitchen, and killed her by hitting her in the head with the same wrench.
ellauri072.html on line 636: The Arizona Supreme Court has set aside the death sentences of a man who bludgeoned to death his girlfriend and each of her two children one at a time with a baseball bat and a pipe wrench as they arrived home from school and work. The court ruled that the crimes of James Granvil Wallace were not legally heinous.
ellauri072.html on line 645: Anna was the first to come home that day. Wallace hid behind the front door with a baseball bat. When she arrived, he hit her at least 10 times so hard the baseball bat broke. But she was still moaning and not yet dead. He drug her into the bathroom and plunged the broken bat into her neck and out her back.
ellauri073.html on line 60: ”Mies ei oikein saa sanoa enää mitään mielipidettä” – Feministit voisivat rauhoittua, sanoi Kauko Röyhkä hiljan ja nautti, kun some kuohahtaa. Man is not allowed to say any more opinion - feminists could calm down, say a remote burp. Halusinkin saada tietyn porukan ärsyyntymään.
ellauri073.html on line 161: Suoraan sanottuna: Voimmeko yhä harrastaa joskus seksiä?
ellauri073.html on line 177: Alice Miller, born as Alicija Englard (12 January 1923 – 14 April 2010), was a Polish-Swiss psychologist, psychoanalyst and philosopher of Jewish origin, who is noted for her books on parental child abuse, translated into several languages. She was also a noted public intellectual. In her books she departed from psychoanalysis, charging it with being similar to the poisonous pedagogies. she felt that psychoanalytic theory and practice made it impossible for former victims of child abuse to recognize the violations inflicted on them and to resolve the consequences of the abuse, as they "remained in the old tradition of blaming the child and protecting the parents." She addressed the two reactions to the loss of love in childhood, depression and grandiosity.
ellauri073.html on line 191: Mutkun Wallu löytyi leukakiikusta, se ratkaisi asian. Nyziltä ei voinut enää tulla lisää kirjoja eikä kukaan voinut enää pettyä. Nyt voitiin olla vaan surullisia, ja ihmetellä mixi sen piti tappaa izensä. Hei heput! Kuunnelkaa nyt vähän muakin! Kyllä mullakin on ollut välistä aika kurjaa täällä Euroopassa. Mulla ei ole tota porvarillista "depressio" tautia, mä oon tavallinen psykopaatti vaan. Sanotte mua vihaajax kun kirjoitan näin rumasti Wallusta, mut oikeestihan se ootte te jotka vihaatte mua! Ette edes paina mun kirjoja! Eikä musta luennoida englannin laitoxilla niinkuin Wallusta. Emmä saa edes ize luennoida niissä. Mitä vittua. Mitä se muka teki paremmin kuin mä?
ellauri073.html on line 204: Mrs. McC.’s sedulous attention to her own person’s dress and grooming is already a minor legend among the press corps, and some of the techs speculate that things like getting her nails and hair done, together with being almost Siametically attached to Ms. Lisa Graham Keegan (who is AZ’s education superintendent and supposedly traveling with the senator as his “Advisor on Issues Affecting Education” but is quite plainly really along because she’s Cindy McCain’s friend and confidante and the one person in whose presence Mrs. McC. doesn’t look like a jacklighted deer), are the only things keeping this extremely fragile person together on the Trail. (Onx tää nyt se jota sanottiin julkisesti emättimexi? Ei hizi, kyllä sille tarvittaisiin joku miellyttävämpi sana.)
ellauri073.html on line 210: John McCain oli US politiikan David Foster Wallace (jatkaa Matt): pelkkää pintaliitoa. Molempien ura oli vaihtoehtoista totuutta. Wallace oli muka “avant-garde” artisti mutta matki Hubert Selbyä, Franz Kafkaa ja 12 muuta hemmoa; McCain oli "sotasankari" joka särki 8 konetta ja särkyi kidutuxessa. (En mä ois kyllä, miettii Matt). Molemmat oli huonoja koulussa: Wallu jätti kesken tohtoriopinnot ja Johnu sai melkein potkut sota-akatemiasta. Ne oli ilkeitä naisille: Wallu stalkkasi useita naisia ja kerran työnsi tyttöystävänsä liikkuvasta autosta. McCain otti avioeron vammaisesta vaimosta ja nimitti tosta vaimoa julkisesti "vituxi". Wallace oli olevinaan omaperäinen vaikka se kirjoitti kuin ala-asteella, ja McCain oli olevinaan kapinoizija vaikka se oli rebublikaanina ihan keskitasoa. Tähän vähän lisää Wallun plitiikkanäkemyxiä:
ellauri073.html on line 248: Wallun vaikutus Amerikan kirjallisuuteen oli yhtä päiväperhosmainen kuin rotan pieru. Sitä suosivien painotalojen suojeltua sen ilmeisiä heikkouxia, internetin aiheuttama kulttuurin hajaannus viime 10 vuoden aikana on haudannut Wallun yhtä varmasti kuin sen paarinkantajat. (Tää oli kyllä erittäin huonosti suunniteltu virke, sori Matt, anakoluutti suorastaan. Sen huomaa kun sitä koittaa kääntäjänä pelastaa.) Ilman Wallun ihan kyynisesti vittuilumielessä tehtyä suikkaria jengi olis huomannut tän paljon aiemmin.
ellauri073.html on line 254: Hahaha look at you you fat fuck. You choose to spend your time bashing a man who has been dead for a decade, and there's no real reason for it other than the obvious jealousy that consumes you as an ugly person, inside and out. You break your criticism down into two distinctions: Foster's writing and his character. First, on your criticism of his character, I will say that it is entirely ironic that you choose to do so, considering that in your mediocre (that's right buddy your disgustingly fat ass as it is right now is entirely more mediocre than most unmistakably mediocre things, including (but not limited to) the entire Oakland Athletics organization) life your accomplishments include being - and here I'm just being honest with you, and it's possible that you may have heard this already in your pathetic, insufferable life but just hear me out -- LITERALLY THE FATTEST, BALDEST, AND JUST FLAT OUT UGLIEST PIECE OF SHIT PERSON I HAVE EVER SEEN. (For more on that here's a link to a picture I found of Matt online during a quick goggle search: https://www.google.com/sear....
ellauri073.html on line 262: Foley is disheveled, sweaty, obese, clumsy and unstylish. He exhibits poor social skills, frequently loses his temper, often disparages and insults his audience, and wallows in cynicism and self-pity about his own poor life choices, to which he often makes reference. Foley's trademark line is warning his audience that they could end up like himself: "35 years old, eating a steady diet of government cheese, thrice divorced, and living in a van down by the river!" In most sketches, whenever a member of his audience mentions a personal accomplishment, Foley responds with mockery: "Well, la-dee-frickin-da!", "Whoop-dee-frickin-doo!", or a similarly dismissive remark. The usual outfit of choice for Foley is a too-small blue-and-white plaid sport coat, a too-big white dress shirt, a solid green necktie, black horn-rimmed glasses, ill-fitting khakis which he is continually pulling up, a wristwatch, penny loafers, and slicked-down blond hair. In a prison sketch, he dons blue jeans and a denim shirt with the inmate number "3307" while retaining his watch, glasses and a crucifix necklace (he also mentions a "homemade tattoo of a van down by the river"). While working as a mall Santa in another sketch, he wears a stereotypical Santa outfit, complete with black snow boots.
ellauri073.html on line 269: In the sketch itself, Foley attempts to motivate two teens, played by Spade and Applegate, to "get themselves back on the right track" after the family’s cleaning lady finds a bag of marijuana in their home. Foley’s attempt to motivate them falls short when he repeatedly insists that they're "not going to amount to jack squat" and will end up “living in a van down by the river!” Foley attempts to endear himself to Spade's character by telling him they're "gonna be buddies" and that everywhere he goes, Foley will follow. Comparing himself to Spade's shadow, Foley jumps about where he's standing and then dives into the coffee table, though he picks himself up moments later. None of the other cast members knew that Farley was going to do this and their startled reactions are genuine. The sketch ends with Foley offering that the only solution to solve the family's problems is for him to move in with them. Horrified, Applegate begs him not to, vowing never to smoke pot again. Even so, Foley leaves the house to get his things from his van and the family locks him out, finally reconciling and admitting to how much they love each other.
ellauri073.html on line 271: A later performance (February 19, 1994) features Foley in prison attempting to motivate troubled teens in a scared straight program; he was imprisoned for three to five years for non-payment of alimony (consistent with him being “thrice divorced”). Before entering the sketch, Foley is introduced by his cellmate Deshawn Powers (Martin Lawrence) as “just finished a week in solitary, eating nothing but coffee beans.” Foley attempts to scare the juvenile delinquents by commenting in a slightly different manner that he “wished to dear God, that he was living in a van down by the river!” The sketch followed the usual Foley routine with him falling through the prison wall instead of a coffee table, which eventually led to his and the other inmates' escape.
ellauri073.html on line 275: Quickly on your attacks on Wallace's writing style, I will mention that -- contrary to your rather baffling notions -- people did enjoy Infinite Jest and other works of his. They will continue to do so for decades. Listen Fartey: his work will live on. People recognize great writing wherever it materializes. Forget your distaste of footnotes, or your struggle in understanding the themes and ideals his work encompasses. His audience is clearly beyond you, so try to see that not everyone feels the same as you. You don't have to like his writing, but when you detract from it it makes it even more apparent that you are the lesser man. Your comments on Foster's writing ability led me to some of your other articles, and to be completely honest, it wasn't all bad. I genuinely enjoyed your "Fucking vs. Making Love" poetry bit, although it did seem like a cheap knockoff of Black Coffee Blues. Regardless, I can still acknowledge that the piece had its moments. However (and this is where I want you to pay attention you tub of lard), the piece can also be slammed in several areas. This is highly important, as we can see the parallels between this aspect of "Fucking vs. Making Love" and anything David Foster Wallace wrote. When it comes down to it, your writing can be criticized stylistically and formatically just like his can; the only difference is that there are few that actually give a shit about your writing, whereas Wallace's work is meaningful to the point where people have legitimate incentive to think critically about it. So defile it with your petty blog posts all you want, but at the end of the day you're the one who's only making yourself look bad, and as a heavily obese man based in Europe you are surely having few problems achieving this in the status quo, since Europeans are notably fatist.
ellauri073.html on line 277: Remember this Fartey, for it will serve you well: There is nothing inherently admirable or intriguing in your choosing to complain about various outlets, activities, or people. It's mundane, tiresome, and has little uniqueness. Suffice it to say, there are a million of you, Matt Fartey (and when I say you I really mean babbling little shits). You will be forgotten; there is only one David Foster Wallace...so tell me, who's really the mediocre one here?
ellauri073.html on line 312: ”Mutta se oli tosi hyvä. Mulle sanottiin, että mänet sinne vaan, kyllä sä pärjäät.”
ellauri073.html on line 340: Rock Your Day -videoita varten Immonen on joutunut opettelemaan äänenkäyttöä. ”Nuorempana mulle sanottiin, että voitko puhua vähän kovempaa, mutta tää osoittaa että se on harjoittelukysymys. Kovalla harjoittelulla ja työllä jokainen ihminen saa sitä ääntä lähtemään niin paljon kuin tarvii.”
ellauri073.html on line 346: Kun Immonen alkoi tehdä Rock Your Day -videoita, niin hänelle sanottiin, että nyt Janne on seonnut lopullisesti. Mutta Immosen täytyy elää niin kuin opettaa: Live the dream.
ellauri073.html on line 357: Wallace's father said that David had suffered from major depressive disorder for more than 20 years and that antidepressant medication had allowed him to be productive. Wallace experienced severe side effects from the medication, and in June 2007, he stopped taking phenelzine, his primary antidepressant drug, on his doctor's advice. His depression recurred, and he tried other treatments, including electroconvulsive therapy. Eventually he went back on phenelzine but found it ineffective. On September 12, 2008, at age 46, Wallace wrote a private two-page suicide note to his wife, arranged part of the manuscript for The Pale King, and hanged himself from a rafter of his house.
ellauri073.html on line 443: “seemed intuitively to sense that it was a matter not of reduction at all, but—perversely—of expansion, the aleatory flutter of uncontrolled, metastatic growth—each well-shot ball admitting of n possible responses, n-squared possible responses to those responses, and on into what Incandenza would articulate to anyone who shared both his backgrounds as a Cantorian continuum of infinities of possible move and response, Cantorian and beautiful because infoliating, contained, this diagnate infinity of infinities of choice and execution, mathematically uncontrolled but humanly contained, bounded by the talent and imagination of self and opponent, bent in on itself by the containing boundaries of skill and imagination that brought one player finally down, that kept both from winning, that made it, finally, a game, these boundaries of self.”
ellauri073.html on line 451: But I’m not the boss of you. This is America—you can do whatever you want to. For example, you could start with some articles I’ve written for a variety of publications, including The New York Times Magazine and Hazlitt.
ellauri073.html on line 554: Salaliittoteoriassa on lyhykäisyydessään kyse siitä, että maailman uskotaan olevan korruptoituneen, satanistisen valtaeliitin hallussa. Tämä valtaeliitti harjoittaa pedofiliaa suuressa mittakaavassa ja rituaalimurhaa lapsia. Tulossa on kuitenkin niin sanottu myrsky, jossa QAnon-väen sankari, Yhdysvaltain presidentti Donald Trump johtaa hyvän joukot pahaa vastaan. Trumpin johdolla sitten pidätetään joukoittain valtaeliitin jäseniä, kuten Sale Niinistö ja valtamedioiden edustajia, kuten Helsingin Sanomien toimitus.
ellauri074.html on line 67: They breathe deeply and walk with large strides, eternally hurrying home to see about dinner. They are the kind who say, with a tender smile, “Money’s not everything.”
ellauri074.html on line 85: There are the ones who simply cannot fathom why all the men are mad about them. They say they’ve tried and tried. They tell you about someone’s husband; what he said and how he looked when he said it. And then they sigh and ask, “My dear, what is there about me?” —Don’t you hate them?
ellauri074.html on line 104: No toisaalta, onhan paskantaminenkin ja pano joka kerta samaa ja silti erilaista ja aina viihdyttävää. Mulle riittää ne, ja syöminen, ym muut syklisesti toistuvat eläimelliset elintoiminnot. Plus paasaus. Onhan siinäkin toki toisto tyylikeinona, kuten on näiden puolentoistatuhannen paasauxen kuluessa käynyt selväxi. Touché, jotkut tykkää tyttärestä ja jotkut äidistä.
ellauri074.html on line 110: Phelps ja Phelps, Järkähtämättömän minuuden kultit: Kenttäopas valuuttakeinottelun, melaniinin, kuntoilun, bioflavonoidien, katselun, salamurhien, pysähtyneisyyden, omaisuuden, torikammon, maineen, julkisuuden, korkeanpaikankammon, esiintymisen, Amwayn, kuuluisuuden, surullisenkuuluisuuden, epämuodostumien, katsotuksi tulemisen pelon, lauseopin, kuluttajateknologian, katsomisvimman, presleyismin, hunterismin, sisäisen lapsen, Eroksen, muukalaiskammon, kirurgisten parannusten, kannustuspuheiden, kroonisen kivun, solipsismin, Prepper-liikkeen, armosta osattomaxi jättämisen (preterition), abortinvastustamisen, kevorkianismin, allergian, albinismin, urheilun, tuhatvuotisen valtakunnan oppien ja televiihteen kultteihin ONANia edeltäneessä Pohjois-Amerikassa.
ellauri074.html on line 247: One way he would get people to do this is by making them do a firewalk over a bed of hot embers. Most people at his seminars normally thought that would be impossible. By showing them that they can walk on fire, it helped the attendees see that they had preconceived notions that weren’t true. (The trick is to wear thick-soled shoes with a huge carbon footprint.)
ellauri074.html on line 250: Tony Robbins most notable seminar is now his Business Mastery seminar. In this seminar, he teaches business owners various growth strategies, systems, and resources that help them grow their business. These are the same strategies that industry leaders like Apple, Orange, Zippos, Zappos, American Express, and Facebook used to grow their companies.
ellauri074.html on line 253: Hugh Michael Jackman is an Australian actor, singer, multi-instrumentalist, dancer and producer. Jackman has won international recognition for his roles in major films, notably as superhero, period, and romance characters. He is best known for his long-running role as Wolverine in the X-Men film series, as well as for his lead roles in the...
ellauri074.html on line 258: In 2016, he launched the Tony Robbins Podcast. The first season was primarily focused on ways for small to medium-sized businesses to gain an advantage over their market. He has since pivoted to not only talk about how to build a bigger business but also topics such as how to deepen your relationships, become more productive, and live in abundance. The Tony Robbins Podcast has thousands of 5-star reviews on Apple Podcasts and has been downloaded by millions of people worldwide.
ellauri074.html on line 270: Cioran aloitti filosofian opinnot Bukarestin yliopistossa 17-vuotiaana ja tutustui siellä vuonna 1928 Eugène Ionescoon ja Mircea Eliadeen. Hän valmistui kandidaatiksi 1932. Vuosina 1933–1935 Cioran opiskeli Berliinin yliopistossa, jossa hän tutustui Ludwig Klagesiin ja Nicolai Hartmanniin. Palattuaan Romaniaan hän opetti 1936–1937 filosofiaa Andrei Șagunan lukiossa Brașovissa.
ellauri074.html on line 281: Erittäin hyvin sanottu. Mulle se paikka on Käpylä. Kouvola oli vaan paikka jossa kävin työaikana epäonnistumassa. Ciorania epäillään sekä fasismista että anarkismista. Sekin kuulostaa lupaavalta. Nuorempana se ehkä oli vähän fasisti, mutta se karisi sittemmin enimmäxeen pois. Sen sijaan siitä tuli erittäin onnistunut ihmisvihaaja, ihan Timon Ateenalaisen väkevyyxinen. Vaikuttaa siis oikeinkin järkevältä hessulta. Mutta luetaanpa eteenpäin.
ellauri074.html on line 283: Cioran julkaisi ensimmäisen teoksensa Pe culmile disperării ('Epätoivon huipulla') 22-vuotiaana vuonna 1934. Teos sai Romaniassa innostuneen vastaanoton, ja Ciorania alettiin nuoresta iästään huolimatta pitää yhtenä tärkeimmistä romanialaisista kirjailijoista. Myös Cartea amăgirilor (”Harhojen kirja”, 1935), Schimbarea la față a României ('Romanian kirkastus', 1936) ja Lacrimi și Sfinți ('Kyyneleitä ja pyhimyksiä', 1937) julkaistiin Romaniassa. Viimeinen kirja aiheutti Romaniassa skandaalin.
ellauri074.html on line 371: Le monothéisme judéo-chrétien est le stalinisme de l'Antiquité.
ellauri074.html on line 464: It is written: "You shall walk modestly with your God." It is therefore necessary to be modest in all your ways. Thus when putting on or removing your shirt or any other garment from your body you should be very careful not to uncover your body. You should put on and remove the garment while lying in bed under a cover. You should not say: "I am in a private, and dark place." "Who will see me?" Because the Holy One, Blessed is He, Whose glory fills the entire world [sees] and to Him darkness is like light, Blessed be His Name. Modesty and shame bring a person to submissiveness before Him, Blessed be His name. He does not want to look at your hairy genitals. He knows how they look, after all He made them. Don't worry He does not peek under the cover, although He could.
ellauri074.html on line 561: SYDNEY GOTTLIEB: Hej Emelie! Jag håller med, en coronapsykolog på 11312 som är tillgänglig 24/7 (det får väl vara flera då antar jag)! I brist på iva-plats sku det hjälpa dej som fan. Fram tills dess att vi får det får jag helt enkelt ta jobbet. Prata med närstående och kolla om de kan betala notan (det blir inte billigt). Du har bra koll på känslor låter det som så jag tycker att du ska använda dig av dina kunskaper och stötta dem i din omgivning, inte bara kommer du hjälpa dem, det kommer kännas bra också för dig! Än mera för mig 😊! Ta hand om oss båda!
ellauri074.html on line 649: Wallace was deeply suspicious of the media infrastructure that was, when he died, still largely known as “the Net”—“I allow myself to Webulize only once a week now,” he once told a grad student—and he remarked to his wife, as they were moving computer equipment into their house, “thank God I wasn't raised in this era.” Having written his first big stories on a Smith Corona typewriter, Wallace disliked digital drafts and e-publishing in general. He took particular pleasure in the fact that his house in Indiana, the one recreated in The End of the Tour, had the elegantly atavistic address of “Rural Route 2.” He preferred to file his students’ work not on computers, but in a pink Care Bears folder.
ellauri077.html on line 46: This article examines David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest alongside its eponymous film, arguing that they share a common purpose, but that the former succeeds where the latter fails. Coupled with a biographical and phenomenological analysis, the aim of this examination is to better understand Infinite Jest’s place in the cultural and literary movement away from post-modernism. Through the novel, Wallace seeks a cure for the postmodern malaise that is irony, which creates a distancing effect between author and reader. I argue that he collapses this distance by creating a conversation-like novel that uses sentimentality and endnotes to converse with a generation bombarded with easily consumable irony from television, advertisements, and even art. The results of this conversation are the curtailing of passive consumption of entertainment and the beginning of a new sincerity in literature, which allows for grand narratives without the unending cynicism of postmodernism.
ellauri077.html on line 75: Viisikymmentäkuusivuotias amerikkalainen Nobel-palkittu runoilija, kohtalaisen ylipainoinen mies, joka amerikkalaisissa kirjallisuuspiireissä tunnettiin "runoilijoiden runoilijana" tai toisinaan pelkästään "Runoilijana", istui rinta paljaana aurinkoisella terassilla puolittain makuuasentoon käännetyssä aurinkotuoliissa kohtalaisessa määrin mutta ei vakavasti ylipainoisena, mies joka oli voittanut Kansallisen Kirja Palkinnon (2x), Kansallisen Kirja-arvostelijoiden Piiri Palkinnnon ja Lamont-palkinnon, saanut 2 apurahaa Kansalliselta Taidesäätiöltä, Rooman palkinnon, Lannan-säätiön stipendin, MacDowell-mitalin ja Mildred ja Harold Straussin Elämispalkinto -palkinnon Amerikan Taiteiden ja Kirjeiden Akatemialta ja Instituutilta sekä tullut valituxi KYNÄ-klubin pen palixi, runoilija jota 2kin sukupolvea oli julistant sukupolvensa äänexi ja joka nyt oli siis 56 vuotias ja loikoili kuivat Speedo-merkkiset XL-kokoiset uimahousut jalassa markiisikankaisessa, portaittain säädettävässä kansituolissa laatoitetulla terassilla kotinsa uima-altaan ääressä, runoilija joka ensimmäisten amerikkalaisten joukossa sai arvovaltaisen John D. ja Catherine T. MacArthur säätiöltä "Nero-palkinnon", joka oli vain 1/3 elossa olevasta amerikkalaisesta kirjallisuuden nobelistista, oli 172 senttiä pitkä, painoi 82 kiloa, oli ruskeatukkainen ja oli aina välillä huolinut/torjunut erilaisia Hius Lisäys Järjestelmä -merkkisiä hiussiirrännäisiä niin, että hänen hiusrajansa oli epätasaisesti vetäytynyt, ja nyt hän siis istui - tai kukaties tarkemmin sanottuna vain "lojui" - mustissa Speedoissa kotinsa munuaisen-
ellauri077.html on line 109: Masisten välillä Wallun opinnot edistyivät mainiosti. Se kirjoitti esseen ‘Richard Taylorin fatalismi ja fyysisen modaliteetin semantiikka' filosofian sivulavina. (Hizi tääkin tulee lähelle mun omaa sivulavia, jossa tutkin samaa modaliteettia peliteorian käsitteistön avulla. Olen varma että mun analyyssi oli parempi.) Se sai siitä Gail Kennedyn muistopalkinnon. Vuonna 2011, lavi julkaistiin nimellä ‘Kohtalo, aika ja kieli: yritelmä vapaasta tahdosta'. Tää mun kyllä pitäs lukea!
ellauri077.html on line 123: Vaikka McLeanin ohjelma paransi riippuvuuden, Wallu huomasi että kirjoitustaito oli mennyt. Sitäpaizi sitä varotettiin yrittämästä uudestaan Harvardiin, ja sille sanottiin että jos se ei pysyisi irti huumeista ja viinasta, se olisi 30-vuotiaana vainaja.
ellauri077.html on line 188: Markkinatalous perustuu luotolle eli hyväuskoisien hölmöjen naiivin luottamuxen väärinkäytölle. Sixi valehtelu on jenkkiläisten tärkeimpiä taitoja. Sixi myös jenkkileffoissa ja kirjoissa se on tärkeässä osassa, esim noissa tuiki tavallisissa rehellisyyden vakuutteluissa: Trust me, I promise, no kidding, really, I swear to god, you gotta believe me, would I lie to you, I'm not a crook. Siitä puhe mistä puute.
ellauri077.html on line 198: Loputtomassa läpässä on oleellisesti 3 juonta: Incandenzan perheen puuhat Tennisakatemiassa (tätä mä oon lukenut nyt 1 romskun verran, 245 sivua); Don Gatelyn ja muiden toipilaitten sekoilut Ennetin puolimatkankodissa (näitä on jo nähty, huoh kiitos vaan); ja filmin 'Loputon läppä' kvesti, jossa tähtinä on Remy Martin (se pyörätuolijäbä), ja Hugh/Helen Steeply (hirmu iso transu joka bylsii Orinia). Niiden suuhun Wallu panee syvälliset mietteensä. Ne on kuin jumala ja jeesus Miltonin Paradise Lostissa. Ekat 2 juonta ei liity mitenkään toisiinsa (miten niin? onhan siinä samoja henkilöitä, niiku et Orin bylsii sitä transua (Hal-Orin, haha, sanaleikki, joka osottaa että ne on Tävskytin kaxi puolta. The Halorin family name was found in the USA in 1880. Massachusetts had the highest population of Halorin families in 1880.) Mario on varmaan sit Amy, tai sit Super Mario, tai luultavimmin Wallu taas. Orin, Mario ja Hal on Tupu, Hupu ja Lupu, Wallukolmoset. Wallu kyllä vinkkaa että juonet yhtyvät kun romsku on jo loppunut. Varmaan siinä kustannustoimittajan poisleikkaamassa 300 sivussa. Kaikki 3 juonta liittyy temaattisesti: viihde, valinta ja stöpselöinti. Leffan 'Loputon läppä' filmas Wallun pappa Jim Incandenza, koittaessaan tehdä jotain niin pakottavaa että se pysäyttäisi Hal-pojan putoomisen solipsismin, ilottomuuden ja kuoleman sudenkuoppaan. Filmiä ei koskaan julkaistu ja se jäi kesken kun Jim teki ize seppukun sen loppusuoralla. Mutta romskun edetessä (SPOILERIVAROITUS!) lukijalle selviää että filmi oli löytynyt ja toimii ehkä terroristiaseena. (No sehän tuli selväxi jo tässä alkuosassa.) Leffa on tosiaankin niin "vitun pakottava" että se tekee kazojista zombieita, ne on kuin Lassi telkan edessä, töllöttävät vaan, eikä enää muuta tahdokaan. Loppuviimein, vinkkaa kertoja, Hal ja Gately jossain vaiheessa kaivaa kahteen pekkaan isä Jimin pään maasta eziessään filmiä. Filmin sisällöstä ei ole kunnon kuvausta. Jotain kohtauxia väläytellään, esim Joelle van Dynen jossa se "pyytää anteexi" kazojilta uudestaan ja uudestaan, sanoen ‘I’m so sorry. I’m so terribly sorry. I am so, so sorry. Please know how very, very, very sorry I am’ (939). Huh, onpas pitkällä. Tää on kyllä kertaalleen sanottu jo tässä alkupätkässä. Tämmönen anteexipyytely on kanssa saamaa markkinapaskaa kuin toi "luottamus", ilmaisexi pyydetään, kun luottokortti vingahtaa. Koko kirjasta (vaiko vaan filmistä) tulee 1 suuri anteexipyyntö, onxe sitten isältä pojalle vai päinvastoin, sama se. Ne ei koskaan pystyneet "keskustelemaan". Tää "We gotta talk" on kanssa yx jenkkitomppelius, hemmetti, mitä sitä varten pitää erixeen tilata vastaanotto tai merkata kalenteriaika, senkun riitelevät vaan. Niin mekin tehdään. Tää mun juttu, Barrett tunnustaa, kuuluu perinteiseen "elämä ja teos" genreen, Wallun romsku on "symbolistiteos" "kirjailijan sisällyttämisestä textiin". Wallu koittaa estää kokonaista sukupolvea uppoutumasta pelkkään viihteen kazeluun. Lukekaa kirjoja, ääliöt! Paxuja kirjoja! Mun kirjoja, ne on kaikista paxuimpia! Saatana! Kun tiili kolahtaa päähän nukahtaessa tulee pahoja kuhmuja. We apologize for the inconvenience.
ellauri077.html on line 207: But not all things emanating from this country move quite so quickly. Take, for instance, David Foster Wallace’s near-canonical mega-novel Infinite Jest: released in the States in 1996, it has in 20 years been translated into just five languages. (A sixth translation into Greek is currently in the works.) At this rate, it is moving only slightly faster than the massive Quixote, which had appeared in England, France, the Germanic territories, and Venice 20 years after its complete Castilian publication in 1615. However, Jest is massively behind the 3,600-page über-novel My Struggle, which—just 5 years after its complete Norwegian release—is available or forthcoming in over 20 languages.
ellauri077.html on line 216: Once again, the preponderance of American culture in Germany makes Infinite Jest a book that is readily understood. (And at this point I can’t help but take glee in the inherently Wallacian irony that American capitalism’s blob-like smearing of the globalized world has prepared the way for a scathing critique of this very same capitalism contained, Trojan Horse-style, inside a recondite mega-novel.) Still, things get lost: Blumenbach said that he “annotated the text as far as I could, and the publishers put those sixty pages of annotations on their website for a while.”
ellauri077.html on line 218: Galindo tells me that Wallace’s heavy sense of irony and self-deprecation fits in rather well with contemporary Brazil: “What... is much more HUMAN. It is not AMERICAN (though, I repeat, he may have thought it was).
ellauri077.html on line 329: Another aspect that defined his thoughts was the concept that would later inspire the work of other great writers such as Kafka, Unamuno, or philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. We’re talking about "anxiety", the feeling that never disappears. This is because it also helps us become aware that there are more options in life, that we’re free to jump into the void or take a step back and seek other solutions, like happy homosexuality. There’s always an alternative to suffering, but suffering itself helps "it" grow.
ellauri077.html on line 363: Morris said that Homo sapiens not only have the largest brains of all higher primates, but that sexual selection in human evolution has caused humans to have the highest ratio of penis size to body mass.
ellauri077.html on line 366: Morris wrote that the intense human pair bond evolved so that men who were out hunting could trust that their mates back home were not having sex with other men.
ellauri077.html on line 417: "Kenties", pitää sanoa kuin Lea Virkkulassa: tästä voi olla jotain hyötyä. Usko on meidän toiveajattelua ikuisuudesta, taivaan isästä. Apina pyrkii jumalan luoxe uskomalla siihen ja huutamalla sille: Mä uskon kyllä kunhan sanot vaan mihkä täytyy uskoa! Anything goes kunhan vakuutat etmä pysyn vainajana hengissä.
ellauri077.html on line 434: We need God, not in order to understand the why, but in order to feel and sustain
ellauri077.html on line 442: It is important to our friends to believe that we are unreservedly frank with them, and important to friendship that we are not.”
ellauri077.html on line 474:

their critique is concerned with irony as an attitude towards existence, not as just a verbal strategy;
ellauri077.html on line 477:
that liberation from this empty, aimless form of irony cannot be achieved through the ironizing of irony, i.e. meta-irony; and
ellauri077.html on line 484: Lällärifilosofeille, pappispimittäjille ym. posetiivareille yhteinen piirre on sanojen "merkitys" ja "arvo" käyttö ihan irrallaan siitä minkä merkityxestä tai arvosta on puhe. Samaa epämääräisyyttä kuin mainoskielessä, "elämä on", "niin hyvää ettei sanotuxi saa". Sellaisen nollapuheen puhujineen sais nakata rodeen ilman vaiheita.
ellauri077.html on line 550: Siinä menee jotain perusteellisesti pieleen että mezästetään kuin narkomaanit onnentunnetta. Vittuun onni, ja vittuun rahakin, sori Wagner. Tunteet on vaan epifyyttejä, ei niitä pidä mezästää, ei ne ole pelin preferenssifunktio. Ne on vaan viitteitä joilla Darwin koittaa vinkata apinalle missäpäin ois sille sopivia ympäristöjä. Darwinista pääasia on sopeutunut eläminen luonnossa. Jos alkaa potkia sitä tutkainta vastaan saa turpaansa. Ennen pitkää tavalla tai toisella. Kun aappa alkaa tinkkeröidä ja oikosulkea tunteiden ja ympäristön suhteita, se joutuu tohon hedonismin loukkuun. FUCK! osastosta puheen ollen on kivempi bylsiä satunnaista hoitoa tai kazoo pornoa ja runkata kuin kiintyä kehkään pysyvämmin ja kärsiä sen huonot puolet parempien kyytipoikana. Ja vastaavasti EAT! ja KILL! osastossa. Mix tehdä ruokaa kun voi syöda einespizzoja, ize asiassa mix syödä ylipäänsä kun voi vetää mömmöjä. Jos kylästyy kazomaan tappamista telkassa voi alkaa räiskiä vaikka kulmavalinnassa pyssyllä. Ei ihme että jenkit on hirveitä punkeroita ja tykkää automaattiaseista.
ellauri077.html on line 613: Wallace saw this (psycho) kind of writing as simply an example of self-love. Like the Onan whose name is another Wallu acronym-pun, these writers were working out of “the part that just wants to be loved” (i.e. the wiener) rather than “out of the part [. . .] that can love,” that is the “art’s heart”.
ellauri077.html on line 627: This process does not lead to a passive, solely pleasurable experience such as taking a drug or watching television. Instead, what awaits that reader is a book that forces her “‘to work hard to access its pleasures, the same way that in real life true pleasure is usually a by-product of hard work and discomfort’” (McCaffery 119). Perhaps the most difficult aspect of Infinite Jest (and the one for which it is fated to be infamously known) is the use of endnotes, which will be our entry into thinking of Infinite Jest as a conversation-text.
ellauri077.html on line 642: Aamen. Se mikä tässä Riston postillassa jää hämmentämään on että Wallu muka koittaa olla vilpitön, mutta missään ei sanota mistä asiasta. Ihankuin "vilpitön" olis joku ilme tai tietynlainen lippalakki. Ehkä se onkin, se on niinkuin joku Sokrates, jolla ei ole mitään sanottavaa izellään, se vaan koittaa opettaa nuorisolle että "etkö sinä tiedä ettet tiedä midiä", tai "tunne izesi!" tai "ole oma izesi" tai "mene ulos leikkimään".
ellauri077.html on line 696:
1. admitting that one cannot control one´s alcoholism, addiction or compulsion;
  ellauri077.html on line 710:
2. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
  ellauri077.html on line 729:
3. Si profonde qu'ait été notre déchéance, nous verrons comment notre expérience peut profiter aux autres.
  ellauri077.html on line 730:
4. Nous perdrons le sentiment d'être inutiles et cesserons de nous apitoyer sur notre sort.
  ellauri077.html on line 735:
5. Notre intuition nous dictera notre conduite dans des situations qui, auparavant, nous déroutaient.
  ellauri077.html on line 746: Cod, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
  ellauri077.html on line 754: The Stoics taught that we should accept whatever is outside our control. “Do you really think you can make a bad situation any worse by complaining about it?” Yes we can! I have tried to make this my own practice, and have tried to complain about things that happen. But not out loud! Marcus Aurelius said: “Don’t be overheard complaining… Not even to yourself.” Mutter your complaints under your breath.
  ellauri077.html on line 796: Foreign words and expressions such as cul de sac, ancien régime, deus ex machina, mutatis mutandis, status quo, gleichschaltung, weltanschauung , are used to give an air of culture and elegance. Except for the useful abbreviations i.e., e.g. , and etc. , there is no real need for any of the hundreds of foreign phrases now current in the English language. Bad writers, and especially scientific, political, and sociological writers, are nearly always haunted by the notion that Latin or Greek words are grander than Saxon ones, and unnecessary words like expedite, ameliorate, predict, extraneous, deracinated, clandestine, subaqueous, and hundreds of others constantly gain ground from their Anglo-Saxon numbers. (Number on latinaa hei pahvi!)
  ellauri077.html on line 804: Meaningless words. In certain kinds of writing, particularly in art criticism and literary criticism, it is normal to come across long passages which are almost completely lacking in meaning. Words like romantic, plastic, values, human, dead, sentimental, natural, vitality , as used in art criticism, are strictly meaningless, in the sense that they not only do not point to any discoverable object, but are hardly ever expected to do so by the reader. When one critic writes, "The outstanding feature of Mr. X's work is its living quality," while another writes, "The immediately striking thing about Mr. X's work is its peculiar deadness," the reader accepts this as a simple difference opinion. If words like black and white were involved, instead of the jargon words dead and living, he would see at once that language was being used in an improper way.
  ellauri077.html on line 806: Many political words are similarly abused. The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable." The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides.
  ellauri077.html on line 810: Haista paska kappalainen, paasaat pappispimitystä kielioppisaarnan valeasussa. Tää on kyllä osuvasti sanottu:
  ellauri077.html on line 865: Why is it that people want this kind of shelter against failure. That they fit in. Tight enough, but also big enough, with some leeway and freedom and the feeling of being free at least in some respect, other than the duty. Duty line and nothing-to-declare green line. Snakes can well eat bigger things than their heads.
  ellauri077.html on line 867: Why is it that the Oedipus has a bigger head than is healthy for him? Why seeing him makes me like a vaccinated cell seeing a virus that I am vaccinated against, but still claustrophobic. I must put my fatherly upper jaw on his head, like the male lion does to the mare, and like a snakely Laertes slip my lower jaw under his pimply chin and swallow. The problem is I cannot do it: he is not my own son, but the son of my wife, and that would be murder. So I just keep my upper jaw symbolically and quietly on his crown like a crown. and suffer this corona. My vaccination took a year of pain, and this is just a chimera of that constant pain.
  ellauri078.html on line 34: Infinity is something we are introduced to in our math classes, and later on we learn that infinity can also be used in physics, philosophy, social sciences, etc. Infinity is characterized by a number of uncountable objects or concepts which have no limits or size. This concept can be used to describe something huge and boundless. It has been studied by plenty of scientists and philosophers of the world, since the early Greek and early Indian epochs. In writing, infinity can be noted by a specific mathematical sign known as the infinity symbol (∞) created by John Wallis, an English mathematician who lived and worked in the 17th century.
  ellauri078.html on line 97: Ballad Meter is a variant of Hymn Meter. Less formal and more conversational in tone than Common Meter, Ballad Meter isn’t as metrically strict, meaning that not all of its feet may be iambic. Also notice the rhyme scheme. Only the second & fourth line rhyme. Common Meter requires a strict ABAB rhyme scheme. The tone, the rhyme scheme, and the varied meter distinguish Ballad Meter from Common Meter.
  ellauri078.html on line 99: The singing of hymns, by the way, was not always a feature of Christian worship. For dumb anglo-saxons it was the briton Isaac Watts, a nonconformist (lue hihhuli) during the late 17th Century, who wedded the meter of Folk Song and Ballad to scripture. One of the churches that fully adopted Watts’ hymns was the The First Church of Amherst, Massachusetts, where Dickinson from girlhood on, worshiped.
  ellauri078.html on line 109: not-stop-for-death-updated.jpg" />
  ellauri078.html on line 132: I could not see to see - voinut nähdä nähdäxeni -
  ellauri078.html on line 143: In an early poem, she chastised science for its prying interests. Its system interfered with the observer’s preferences; its study took the life out of living things. In “‘Arcturus’ is his other name” she writes, “I pull a flower from the woods - / A monster with a glass / Computes the stamens in a breath - / And has her in a ‘class!’” At the same time, Dickinson’s study of botany was clearly a source of delight. She encouraged her friend Abiah Root to join her in a school assignment: “Have you made an herbarium yet? I hope you will, if you have not, it would be such a treasure to you.” She herself took that assignment seriously, keeping the herbarium generated by her botany textbook for the rest of her life.
  ellauri078.html on line 161: Emmy ei ollut mikään siivooja. Se ei pitänyt pölyhuiskasta. No ei imurikaan ole yhtään parempi. Seija tempaisi imurin luukkua niin että muovisarana katkesi. Ei siitä enää tule kalua. Emmy oli witty kuten Lizzy Bennettin äiti, mutta pitikö se ize witeistä? VITTE, VITTEE, E-EE-O! lauloi merikapteeni Fuck Löfgren miehistöineen Paimiosta eli Heikki Silvennoinen Kummeleissa. Was Emily gay? None of business sanoo tylysti Quoran vastaaja, mut of you insist, yes in all probability she was. Her companion was her sister-in-law Gilbert. Proustillakin oli Gilberte, ja Albertine. Kirjailijat joilla on jotain sanottavaa on usein poikkeavia.
  ellauri078.html on line 197: The hymn is usually sung to either "Rockingham" or "Hamburg", the former being more closely associated with the text in British and Commonwealth hymnals. Another alternative, associated with the text in the 19th and 20th centuries, is "Eucharist" by Isaac B. Woodbury.
  ellauri078.html on line 217: Englannin virsirunouden isäksi sanotun Isaac Wattsin (1674-1748) tunnetuin virsi.
  ellauri078.html on line 235: Wallun äiti kävi Mt Holyokea kuten Emily Dickinson. Sen hukin aihetta ei löytymyt kuolinilmoituxesta eikä Holyoken sivuilta. Se ei ollut Holyoken kuuluisa alumni. Se kuoli rakkaittensa ympäröimänä. Lähti Wallun seuraxi. Wallun naisviha narsismi ja lievä psykopatia lyö läpi elvixenmunanpituisesta alaviitteestä 110. Kaikki Emilyn runot ei olleet jenkkivirsimitassa, pussiin oli pujahtanut jokunen trokeinen.
  ellauri078.html on line 252: In a genuinely egalitarian society, however, those views cannot be locked out, in advance, by criminal or civil law: they must instead be discredited by the disgust, outrage, and ridicule of other people.
  ellauri078.html on line 276: Because I could not stop for Death – Kun en pysäyttänyt kuolemalle
  ellauri078.html on line 306: In a letter to Abiah Root, Dickinson once asked, "Does not Eternity appear dreadful to you . . . I often get thinking of it and it seems so dark to me that I almost wish there was no Eternity. To think that we must forever live and never cease to be. It seems as if Death which all so dread because it launches us upon an unknown world would be a relief to so endless a state of existense."
  ellauri079.html on line 43: The name "slapstick" originates from the Italian Batacchio or Bataccio – called the "slap stick" in English – a club-like object composed of two wooden slats used in commedia dell'arte. When struck, the Batacchio produces a loud smacking noise, though it is only a little force that is transferred from the object to the person being struck. Actors may thus hit one another repeatedly with great audible effect while causing no damage and only very minor, if any, pain. Along with the inflatable bladder (of which the whoopee cushion is a modern variant), it was among the earliest special effects. Pynchonilla on myös pierutyynyjä.
  ellauri079.html on line 49: Tollainen liikennemerkki tuli kuin koitti kazella tämän albumin kansikuvaa netissä. Voi helkkari, noi jenkit on sitten tyhmänahneita. Thou shalt not steal from me, though its okay for me to steal from thee. Stop the steal!
  ellauri079.html on line 54: Merimies "Porsas" Bodine on kexitty henkilö joka esiintyy monissa Tuomas Nipistyxen novelleissa. Bodine ilmestyy Veehen (1963), ja toistuu Painovoiman sateenkaaressa (1973). Bodine-nimisiä hahmoja esiintyy myös Masonissa ja Dixonissa (1997) ja Vastoin päiväässä (2006). Hän esiintyy myös lyhyessä tarinassa "Alanko-maat" (1960, 1984). Luonne nimeltä "Puskuri-vaza Bodine", luultavasti "Porsaan" esi-isä, esiintyy määrimiehenä Masonissa ja Dixonissa. Ekaxi kehitetty Veehen päähenkilön Benny Maallisen sivuvaunuxi ja koomisexi kelmuxi, Bodine ilmestyy uudestaan (ca 10 vuotta aiemmaxi sijoitettuna) Painovoiman sateenkaaressa. Vielä 1 merenkyntäjä Bodine, jota sanotaan vaan "O.I.C" (komentava upseeri), tekee kameoesiintymisen Vastoin päiväässä, taas ilman sen kummempaa selvää tarkoitusta kuin ollaxeen intertextuaalinen sisäpiirin läppä.
  ellauri079.html on line 73: Daisy May Moses jota kaikki sanovat "Mummixi", on Jedin anoppi, joten (?) sitä sanotaan, vaikka onkin anoppi, usein "Mummi Klampetixi" vaikka se on ihan toisen niminen. Sillä on raastinrautamainen henkilöllisyys ja se on äkkivihainen, mutta sen kanteet usein hylkää pätemättöminä patriarkka Jed. Se (mummi) on harras etelävaltiolainen ja pitää izeään baptistikristittynä ("upotettu, ei pirskotettu") anteexiantoa sydämessä. Ize nimitetty "M.D." ("vuoritohtori"), Mummi käyttää "valkoista salama" keitostaan eräänlaisena nukutusaineena kun aloittaa kivulloisia hoitoja kuten juotikasimua ja hampaiden poistoa hohtimilla. (Pst: Juotikasimu ei satu.)
  ellauri079.html on line 79: Elly May, Jedin ja Rose Ellen Klampetin ainokainen, on vuoristokaunotar jolla on kansikuvatytön ruumis ja poikatytön sielu. Hän osaa heittää kovaa pesäpalloa ja "painiskella" useimmat miehet kumoon, ja se osaa olla yhtä lempeä ystäviensä eläimien ja perheen kaa kuin se on sitkeä pala "painikumppaneiden" kanssa. Se sanoo kerran että eläimet voi olla parempia kumppaneita kuin ihmiset, mutta kun se tulee vanhemmaxi, se myöntää että "häiskät voi olla hauskempaa painiseuraa kuin elukat". Sen ja perheen koiran Herttuan (vanha verikoira) lisäxi Klampetin tilalla asuu lukuisia lemmikkejä, kiitos eläintenrakastaja Ellyn. 1981 TV elokuvassa, Elly May on eläintarhanjohtaja.
  ellauri079.html on line 113: If Jed Clampett hadn’t done another role in his life he would have still been remembered as Jed Clampett more likely than not. After his time on the show he went on to continue acting here and there but nothing ever really brought him the same kind of fame as he experienced while being Jed. He did manage to get a cameo in the film version of the Beverly Hillbillies but apart from that he was retired at that time and wasn’t doing much at all. He passed away due to respiratory failure in 2003.
  ellauri079.html on line 115: Ellie May Clampett was unable to do much more in getting her career to take off. She went on to become a gospel singer for a while and even practiced real estate for a bit. But nothing ever really kept her from going back to show business as she felt that this was where she belonged. Ellie May passed away from pancreatic cancer in 2015.
  ellauri079.html on line 126: Tässä vielä mäkitupalaisten aloitusmusiikki, jonka jenkkivanhuxet osaa ulkoa. Se on balladi, siis kaiketikin 14-tavuinen kuten Emily Dickinsonin runot. Voikohan niitä laulaa myös Jed Klampetin musiikkiin? P.S. Älä kazo Hillbillyn jaxoja youtubesta, ellet tahdo itkeä etkä heittää ryynejä.
  ellauri079.html on line 139: the Iroquoians (Five Nations and Huron alike) shared a very particular constitution: they saw their societies not as a collection of living individuals but as a collection of eternal names, which over the course of times passed from one individual holder to another. The names were coded into chains of wampum beads.
  ellauri079.html on line 201: Dionysios näyttää ikävästi plagioineen filosofeja mainizematta lähteitä. Se on rumaa, ja epistä. Mut mitä väliä: Kaikista tähänastisista ja tulevista kirjoittajista, jotka väittävät tuntevansa ne asiat joita minä vakavassa mielessä tutkin ja esittävät ne joko minulta tai muilta kuulevinaan tai ize löytäminään, voin sanoa tämän verran: minun mielestäni he eivät voi ymmärtää asiasta yhtään mitään. Tää juttu on näät mystistä, sitä ei voikaan kirjoittaa, se täytyy vaan ize tajuta niinkuin mä. Ei riitä nimi, määritelmä, kuva eikä sanallinen tieto, pitää vaan välähdyxenomaisesti tajuta. Ja se ei onnistukaan joka iikalle, pitää olla lahjoja. Ja niitä pitää tuoda mulle tunnin alussa. Mun luennot on aika kalliita.
  ellauri079.html on line 210: Häkki. Näitä on useita, kaikki vastustavat kaupallista tv-viihdettä ja tv-mainoxia. Valon lajeja. Synkät logiikat. Kai tennis käy kaikille? "Täällä ei ole häviäjiä". Virtausta laatikossa (Flux in the Box, ks tätä). Nää on tennisaiheisia. Loputon läppä. Näitä on 5? versiota. Kaupallista viihdettä. Anulaarifuusio on ystävämme. Ditto voimistettu valo. Berkeleyn sairaanhoitajien liitto. Cambridgen kielioppiteoreetikkojen liitto. Eklottava Steven "Pinky" Pinker mainitaan. Leskimies. Kuolema Scarsdalessa. Ehkä homoilua. Hupia kera lampaiden. Immanentti valtakunta. Tuskan lajeja. Erilaisia pieniä liekkejä. Näissä on viittauxia aviolliseen uskottomuuteen, varmaan Wallun äitykän. Medusa vastaan odaliski. Vois olla Wallun äiti vs. tyttöystävä. Kone aaveessa. (p.o. Ghost in the Machine eikä toisinpäin.) Homo duplex. Tusinoittain John Waynejä. Painoton teeseremonia. Taivaan ja helvetin avioehtosopimus. Tässä mainitaan taas äiti Teresa. Kenenhän mielestä se oli upea? Läppä. Yleisö näyttelijänä. Hyvin ärsyttävä Wallusta. Yhdysvaltalaisten yritysten keskijohdon kyynelehtiviä edustajia. Keskeneräinen. Tää vois suoraan viitata James D. Wallacen tuotantoon (alla). Disney Leith tuuma tuumalta. Readymade-draama. Jälkimmäisiä taas puolitusinaa. Olix tää se Viihde vai? Mies joka alkoi epäillä olevansa lasia. Skizoilua. Amerikkalainen vuosisata tiilen kautta nähtynä. Muzehän on just tää kirjanen?! Onaniadi. Ei erityisen hauska. Maailmankaikkeus menettää malttinsa. Siipikarja siivillään. Moebius strippaa. Tästä tulee mieleen Klibanin Freud´s first slip. Hyvästi byrokraatille. Verisisko: kovaakin kovempi nunna. Väkivallalla herkuttelua. Tulkoon kevennys. Nimettömiäkin on aika liuta. Poissa on Troy. Siitä tuli violetti ex-kaupunki, saastetynnöri. Voittokuponki on poistettu. Wallun painostava muistelus narisevan sängyn purusta isän kaa. Äiti joka ei tykkää siivoamisesta imuroi. Kuuluisien diktaattorien vauvavalokuvia. Viittaus Eskaton-peliin kai. Seiso naurun takana seisovien miesten takana. Lisää rebublikaanista sosiaalitoimistovihaa. Ihan kuin ennen vanhaan. Painostavia isimuisteluxia. Terävä pikku roisto. Turtanoiden hyinen majesteettisuus. Hyvännäköisiä miehiä pienissä fixuissa huoneissa joiden jokainen sentti käytetään typerryttävän tehokkaasti. Oiskohan toi vika jotain homoilua pöpilässä. Alhaisen lämpötilan yhteiskuntaoppi. Poor Yorick. (Ainakin) 3 hurraahuutoa syylle ja seurauxelle. Antaa ymmärtää että Tavis bylsi Aprillia. Halu haluta. Jotain nekrofiliaa. Turvallinen veneily ei ole sattumaa. Antaa ymmärtää että Joellen naama jäi veneen potkuriin. Erittäin vähäinen vaikutus. Narkoleptinen aerobic-opettaja. Oiskohan se Wallu ize. Yöllä on sombrero päässä. Oidipaalista höpöä. Wallu oli takuulla oidipaalinen. Rikostoveri! ...koko tekotaiteellisen ja raivostuttavan epätasaisen uran typerin, inhottavin, tökeröin ja huonoiten editoitu tuote. Pääosissa ikääntynyt pederasti (James) ja tatuoitu katuprostituoitu (Joelle). Sano H niinkuin himokkuus. Jonkun Bressonin synnin enkelien coveri. Never höörd. Aineeton maa. Yawn. Oli suuri ihme että hän eli isässä häntä tuntematta. Taas painostavia isimuisteluxia. Kuolema ja sinkkutyttö. Joku kilometrin pituinen nimi muka jonkun Peter Weissin näytelmästä tehdylle filmille. James yökkii yleisön päälle tuoden mieleen paskanheiton Oulussa. Liian hauskaa. Niinpä niin. Tuo ei ollut enää hauskaa. Surullinen tapaus nimeltä minä. Pahoillaan joka paikassa.. Tähän se päättyi, tai oikeammin loputtomaan läppään nummero 5.
  ellauri079.html on line 218: In this article, we contend that due to their size and emphasis upon addressing external social concerns, the corporate relationship between social enterprises, social awareness and action is more complex than whether or not these organisations engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR). This includes organisations that place less emphasis on CSR as well as other organisations that may be very proficient in CSR initiatives, but are less successful in recording practices. In this context, we identify a number of internal CSR (...)
  ellauri079.html on line 257: Two Theories of Morality. James D. Wallace - 1981 - Noûs 15 (1):76-80. Tääkin on kirja-arvostelu jonkun Stuart Hampshiren tännimisestä kirjasta 1977. James toteaa Hampshireä vastaan, että utilitarismin houkutus on hyvän dimensioiden vinous: kaikella on hintansa, ja sixi on mahdollista laskea tekojen painotettu keskiarvo ja valita niistä paras, kuten peleissä. Isoäidinkin voi myödä kunhan hinta on kohallaan. Tää on nyt nähty esim Ruozissa koronaepidemian hoidossa. Spinozalla sitävastoin näyttäis olevan pää oikealla paikalla, jos Hampshire on ymmärtänyt kunnolla:
  ellauri079.html on line 303: Surprisingly, I use as an example of a free agent here a pingpong player. Presumably because my tennis-playing son has proved unsatisfactory. What I end up saying is distinguish agent causation from event causation. Futile squirming, it does not change anything.
  ellauri079.html on line 318: Vaikka Sokrateen turpiinanto Thrasymakhoxelle ei suorastaan todista oikeuden etevämmyyttä, ei tätä Valtion tunne paikkasi-argumenttia missään kumota. Pikemminkin päinvastoin, sitä hoetaan periaatteena 'yxi henkilö - yxi jopi' joka on Plaatton ideaalirebubliikin perusta. Mut vaikuttaa aika epäinhimilliseltä rajata jokaisen hommat vaan yhdenlaiseen työhön, vaikka se olisi taloudellisinta ja tehokkainta (mitä se ei ole; kapitalismissa tarvitaan laumaa työttömiä jotka on valmiit tekemään 2-3 eri paskaduunia per päivä ja vaihtamaan työnkuvaa sormen napsutuxesta). Nää piirteet jo riittää tekemään Plaatton rebubliikin ihanne-elämän "meille" maistumattomaxi, puhumattakaan muista fasistista piirteistä joita ei tässä tutkita, kuten yläluokan yhteisöllinen elämä, ja panopuun valinta arpanopalla joka on painotettu eugeniikan eduxi. Hizi nää ei todellakaan ole nykyiseen parannuxia. Kaikista kummallisin piirre Plaatton kansalaisten elämän kuvauxessa on että se ei edes painota ainoaa piirrettä joka näyttää edes jotakuinkin hyvältä - että jokainen kansalainen ylpeilee ja iloizee työstään ja sen tuloxista, kerta ne on jokainen tavallaan ihmispesän eduxi. Tää pätee erityisesti kolmannen luokan jäseniin: parturit, puusepät, lääkärit, arkkitehdit, merimiehet ja ne jotka mainitaan aika nololla yhteisnimellä 'rahanrakastajat' - kerta ne tuottaa valtiolle aineellista hyvää mitä ilman se ei pärjäisi. (Hemmetti tää hapan diatribi on selkeästi rahananastajan kynästä.)
  ellauri079.html on line 320: Riita sofisti Thrasymakhoxen kaa on saanut paljon huomiota, koska T. puolustaa provosoivaa teesiä että luonnollinen oikeus on vahvemman oikeutta, ja että totunnaisoikeus on parhaillaankin korkealentoista tyhmyyttä. Provosoivaa ehkä mutta totta. Heikommat saa tahtonsa läpi vaan tiiminä. Tarpeexi iso heikompien tiimi vetää lättyyn harvoja vahvempia. Sokrateen argumentit eri vaiheissa keskustelua eivät saa tässä tilaa. Vaikka ne tukkii Thrasymakhoxen suun ne on ala-arvoisia. Sokrates on izekin niihin tyytymätön R. 354c: “Mitä muhun tulee niin tulos on ettemmä taaskaan tiedä mitään, sillä kun en tiedä mitä oikeus on, tuskin tiedän onko se hyvä asia vai paha, ja onko sellainen ihminen onnellinen vai onneton.” Mutta kerrankin keskustelu ei pääty sormi suussa. 2 yleisön jäsentä, Plaatton veljet Glaukon and Adeimantos haastaa Sokrateen uusintaotteluun: Kenties Thrasymakhos on vaan puolustanut keissiään huonosti; vaan jos Sokrates haluaa vakuuttaa kuulijakuntansa, sen pitää petrata kuin sika juoxua. Veljexet vaatii positiivisen kannanoton mitä oikeus on, ja mitä se tekee omistajansa sielulle.
  ellauri079.html on line 326: No nyt ei jaxa enää suomentaa jenkkien filosofiasivustosta, sanotaan lyhentäen että sen kirjoittajaa vituttaa kun tää on niin totalitaarista, vahvan valtion etu pannaan vapaan individin edun edelle. Tollasta konservativismia mitä uusliberaali ei siedä kuunnella. Paljon parempi on Karl Popperin avoin yhteiskunta vihollisineen. Tollasessa tarvitaan hirmu määrä "guardians" kuten käsineidossa jotka on ystävällisiä kunnon väelle ja käy patraskin kimppuun kuin rakkikoira. Musakin niille pitää valita tää silmämääränä. Ei mitää räppiä poliisikunnalle. Jne jne. Hirmuisesti vaivaa, ja kallista. Paljon parempi että joka iikalla on päässä stezonit ja/tai lippixet ja käsiase lonkalla. "Take him down" huutaa eskareiden vanhemmat riuhtoen esiin rivolleja kun musta pizzakuski unohti ottaa hupparista hupun pois.
  ellauri080.html on line 102: Antiikissa apinoita oli neljänlaisia: vereviä, sapekkaita, limaisia ja mustasappisia. Amerikassa niitä on erään lähteen mukaan viittä sorttia: rohkeita, tunnollisia, seurallisia, mukavia ja tyyniä. Tai toiste päin sanottuna: arkoja, hössöjä, mähiä, äreitä ja hermoja. Vaikka nää piirteet on muka tiristetty ulos kyselyistä faktorianalyysillä, ei silti yllätä, nää on jenkkien tavallisia meemejä. No kyselythän perustuu niinku Theofrastoxen luonteet niissä käytettyihin sanoihin.
  ellauri080.html on line 126: You might find it helpful to use the acronym OCEAN (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) when trying to remember the big five traits. CANOE (for conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, openness, and extraversion) is another commonly used acronym. It also helps to count them with your fingers to make sure you did not forget anything.
  ellauri080.html on line 156:
6. Does not enjoy new things

ellauri330.html on line 40: Myös kaikki uskonnolliset toiminnot, jotka perustuvat aivosähköisen toiminnan mahdollistaman mielikuvituksen toimintaan, häviävät samalla kun aivosähköinen toiminta pysähtyy. ellauri330.html on line 111: Joten "subjektiivisten kokemusten" saaminen ei ole havainnoinnin muoto, eikä se muodosta todistusperustetta ymmärrykseni ympärilläni olevasta maailmasta. Uusaristotelialaiset väittävät, että karteesiset uskovat virheellisesti, että tunnemme subjektiiviset kokemukset samalla tavalla kuin aineelliset esineet. Huomaa, että tässä on syyllinen Descartesin ajattelun uudelleenmäärittely tietoisuuden kannalta: Descartesin mukaan mielessä ei voi olla mitään, mitä tietoisuuden valo ei valaise. Mutta tämä on väärin. Emme ole tietoisia emmekä tiedostamattomia kaikesta, mitä havaitsemme. Toisin kuin tarkkaileminen, katseleminen, tarkasteleminen tai kuunteleminen, havainnointikykyinen tietoisuus jostakin on kognitiivisen vastaanottavuuden muoto. Ei voi vapaaehtoisesti tai tarkoituksella tulla tai olla havainnollisesti tietoiseksi jostakin, eikä ketään voi määrätä tietoiseksi jostakin. Voidaan olla tietoisia vain sellaisista havainnointikohteista, jotka kiinnittävät ja pitävät huomiomme. Uusaristoteelinen monismi on käsitteellisesti järkevä vaihtoehto. ellauri330.html on line 204: Lembergissä lännessä ollaan ydinukrainalaisia. Venäjästä ei ole tietoa. No Lemberg kuuluikin Saxalle tai Puolalle suuren isänmaallisen sodan voittoon saakka. 99% of Americans speak English. But that, somehow does not make them Englishmen... A good point! ellauri330.html on line 209: Mixi sitten Zelenskin äidinkieli ei ole ukraina? Zelenskiy is not a Ukrainian, but a Jew. Jews traditionally speak Russian and spread Russian imperial culture. Read what Vladimir (a.k.a. Ze’ev) Zhabotinsky (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ze%27ev_Jabotinsky) had to say about Jews in Ukraine: ellauri330.html on line 211: Мы сами здесь на юге так усердно и так наивно насаждали в городах обрусительные начала, наша печать столько хлопотала здесь о русском театре и распространении русской книги, что мы под конец совершенно потеряли из виду настоящую, осязательную, арифметическую действительность, как она «выглядит» за пределами нашего куриного кругозора. За этими городами колышется сплошное, почти тридцатимиллионное украинское море. Загляните когда-нибудь не только в центр его, в какой нибудь Миргородский или Васильковский уезд: загляните в его окраины, в Харьковскую или Воронежскую губернию, у самой межи, за которой начинается великорусская речь, – и вы поразитесь, до чего нетронутым и беспримесным осталось это сплошное украинское море. Загляните когда-нибудь не только в центр его, в какой нибудь Миргородский или Васильковский уезд: загляните в его окраины, в Харьковскую или Воронежскую губернию, у самой межи, за которой начинается великорусская речь, — и вы поразитесь, до чего нетронутым и беспримесным осталось это сплошное украинское море. Есть на этой меже села, где по ею сторону речки живут «хохлы», по ту сторону — «кацапы». Живут испокон веков рядом и не смешиваются. Каждая сторона говорит по-своему, одевается по-своему, хранит особый свой обычай; женятся только на своих; чуждаются друг друга, не понимают и не ищут взаимного понимания. Съездил бы туда П. Б. Струве, автор теории о «национальных отталкиваниях», прежде чем говорить о единой трансцендентной «общерусской» сущности. Такого выразительного «отталкивания» нет, говорят, даже на польско-литовской или польско- белорусской этнографической границе.(Урок юбилея Шевченко)Me itse täällä etelässä istutimme niin ahkerasti ja niin naiivisti venäläistämisen periaatteita kaupunkeihin, meidän lehdistömme täällä höystyi niin paljon venäläisestä teatterista ja venäläisten kirjojen levittämisestä, että lopulta menetimme täysin silmistämme todellisen, kosketeltavan, aritmeettisen todellisuuden, miltä se "näyttää" kanahorisonttimme ulkopuolella. Näiden kaupunkien takana heiluu jatkuva, lähes kolmenkymmenen miljoonan voimakas Ukrainan meri. Katso jonain päivänä paitsi sen keskustaa, johonkin Mirgorodin tai Vasilkovsky-alueeseen, missä asustivat Ivan Ivanovizh ja Ivan Nikiforovitzh, katso sen laitamille, Harkovin tai Voronežin lääniin, juuri siihen rajaan, jonka jälkeen suuri venäläinen puhe alkaa - ja hämmästyt kuinka koskematonta ja väärentämätöntä se on. Tämä on jatkuva Ukrainan meri. Tällä rajalla on kyliä, joissa "khokholit" asuvat tällä puolella jokea ja "katsapit" asuvat toisella puolella jokea. Muinaisista ajoista lähtien he ovat asuneet vierekkäin eivätkä sekoitu. Kumpikin osapuoli puhuu omalla tavallaan, pukeutuu omalla tavallaan, ylläpitää omaa erityistapaansa; naimisiin vain omiin; vieraannuttaa toisiaan, eivät ymmärrä eivätkä etsi keskinäistä ymmärrystä. P. B. Struve, "kansallisten vastenmielisyyksien" teorian kirjoittaja, vittu menisi sinne ennen kuin puhuu yhdestä transsendenttisesta "kokovenäläisestä" olemuksesta. Sanotaan, ettei sellaista ilmeistä "luotaantyöntävyyttä" ole edes Puolan ja Liettuan tai Puolan ja Valko-Venäjän etnografisella rajalla. (Oppitunti Ševtšenkon vuosipäivänaä)

Vastaanottokeskustelua

Opinnot jäivät yllättäen

Rokkan rated it * did not like it

Muistorunot lukijalle

Delmore Schwartzin kootut runot

Usage notes

Gravity's Rainbow Plot Diagram

Another Ashkenazi Jew

Dantistin vastaanotolla

Kermaperseet ja havenots

Wincent was not mad, he had problems

10 Things you might not have known about "it"

Another never heard

Another Reason for Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin

Footnotes

Två bussar har blåst av vägen.

Sarah rated it did not like it

Karna Swanson rated it did not like it

Jason A rated it did not like it

Stephan rated it did not like it

Marc rated it did not like it

Victoria rated it did not like it

Jered (mos.) rated it did not like it

A good read or not?

Side note for Jews

Another paradise lost

Lisää kannanottoja valosovelluxesta

Its not chinup!

Joyce but not James

Another Brick Back in The Wall

Georgialainen pohjanoteeraus

Palkinnot ja mitalit

We are not amused

Sanottu. Tehty. Matti Kuusen elämä 1914-1998.

Kaunotar ja hirviö (apinaversio)

Palkinnot ja kunnianosoitukset

Vastaanotto

Pohjanoteeraus

Yleiset mielenterveyshäiriöt arabien ja israelilaisten keskuudessa: Israelin kansallisen terveystutkimuksen havainnot

Ei mikään kaunotar pikemminkin päinvastoin

Punktohtorileikkejä vastaanotolla

Vastaanotto

Luennot

Why do some people (not) believe in heaven and hell?

Why are Europeans not as fat as Americans when Europeans eat white bread and pasta and butter all the time?

Concentrate and do not be angry

Pikku runotyttö

Amnellin istunnot

5. Stop thinking so much, it’s alright not to know the answers.

"She's not a fucking toy!"

Vastaanotto

Another Faunia

Another false Messiah of Judaism

Another Mary, not a virgin

This Hamilton was definitely not a saint nor a virgin.

Oh no not again

Footnote to Howl

T.S.Eliot was another jerk

JONATHAN M. VAJDA

Kenji Miyazawan paras runotulva

Pohjanoteerauxia

Ja sitten huonot uutiset

Why I am not a hindu?

Sähkön käyttöönotto toimistoissa

Neljä kronotyyppiä: kumpi olet?

Why are Europeans not as fat as Americans when Europeans eat white bread and pasta and butter all the time?

Pojat hakkaavat tattia notkein säärin