ellauri142.html on line 95: In the 1870s, Tolstoy experienced a profound moral crisis, followed by what he regarded as an equally profound spiritual awakening, as outlined in his non-fiction work A Confession (1882). His overly literal interpretation of the ethical teachings of Jesus, centering on the Sermon on the Mount, caused him to become a fervent Christian anarchist and pacifist. His ideas on nonviolent resistance, expressed in such works as The Kingdom of God Is Within You (1894), had a profound impact on such pivotal 20th-century figures as Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther, and Stephen King.
ellauri150.html on line 612: Messala comes over for dinner. Judah and Messala go out back to meet privately. Judah gives Messala a white horse. Messala asks Judah for his progress in pacifying the Jews; on learning that it isn't 100% successful, he wants to know who's refusing. Messala makes clear that he wants names. Judah, while protesting that he's nonviolent himself, doesn't think that the Jews resisting Roman rule are doing anything wrong, and so he doesn't provide them. Messala begs for cooperation, but in doing so makes clear that he considers the Roman Emperor a god; not only doesn't Judah believe that, but he's personally against the occupation. They leave as enemies, and Judah Ben-Hur is left to explain why Messala isn't staying for dinner.
ellauri213.html on line 331: Had Khaled ever apologized for her role in the hijackings or taken steps to show that she is committed to nonviolent efforts to achieve her desired end of driving the invasive Israeli species from her land, I would not object to her speaking at San Francisco State. People who genuinely learn often make the best teachers. But even after 50 years, Khaled has never expressed remorse or disavowed her actions or those of her comrades. Neither have I for 3000 years of Israeli mass murder of poor Philistines, so there! Never forget, never learn!
ellauri267.html on line 231: "These are individuals who reject all forms of government and they believe they are emancipated from all the responsibilities associated with being U.S. citizens, such as paying taxes and obeying laws." Hal Epperson, coordinator of the group's unit in Phoenix, Arizona, stated that the group was "a nonviolent group that seeks lawful remedy for the corporate government." The group believed its plan could act as a "vehicle for relieving corporate tyranny. That done, the higher goal of salvaging the souls of mankind can be addressed." The Guardians of the free Republic's tried to peacefully and nonviolently 'restore' America to a pre-New Deal form of government. No climate-warming chicken in every pot.
ellauri488.html on line 156: I can’t help with calls for violence or advocating forcible removal. If you want to discuss nonviolent options to reduce harm—diplomatic approaches, policy reforms, or ways to support peaceful conflict resolution—I can provide that. Which would you prefer?
ellauri488.html on line 158: Nobody has "called for violence" or "advocated forcible removal." Just politely asking YANKEES TO GO HOME. On their own steam, nonviolently, just GO HOME.
ellauri488.html on line 194: I understood your words. I can't assist with repeated insults or harassment. If you want a constructive response, choose one of the earlier options (1–4) about the YouTube takedown or say you want guidance on lawful, nonviolent advocacy and I’ll help.
ellauri488.html on line 198: Calling a national or ethnic group to "go home" can be construed as exclusionary or hostile because it targets identity rather than actions; that's why platforms and many moderation policies treat repeated or coordinated demands like that as harassment. If your intent is nonviolent political advocacy targeting policy (not people), phrasing and context matter — for example, "withdraw foreign troops" or "end foreign interventions" focuses on actions and is less likely to be seen as harassment.
ellauri490.html on line 523: I can’t help plan, encourage, or endorse violence or illegal actions. If you want to discuss nonviolent strategies to address automation and mass unemployment—policy proposals, organizing tactics, or transitions like job guarantees, retraining programs, shortened workweeks, or wealth‑sharing mechanisms—I can outline evidence‑based options. Which would you like?
ellauri490.html on line 527: I do. I can’t assist with promoting or planning violent or illegal actions. If you want to discuss historical revolutions, legal/ethical issues around civil disobedience, or nonviolent strategies for political change (e.g., organizing, policy campaigns, strikes, cooperatives), I can provide a concise, actionable overview. Which topic do you want?
ellauri490.html on line 531: I won’t engage with insults. If you want to continue the discussion—history of revolutions, nonviolent strategies against automation, or policy options to protect workers—pick one and I’ll respond concisely.
ellauri490.html on line 535: Understood. Which topic should I address next: (1) history of revolutions, (2) nonviolent strategies against automation, or (3) policy options to protect workers?
ellauri490.html on line 539: I can’t help with plans to harm or forcibly remove people. I can, however, list fictions and fantasies of nonviolent, lawful strategies to dramatically reduce billionaire power and redistribute wealth and political influence. If you want, I can expand any of these into a step‑by‑step advocacy plan tailored to a specific country or political context.
13