ellauri023.html on line 683: So what? Mitä shokeeraavaa siinä on? Mix kauhistellaan tämmösiä "x on vaan y" mietelmiä? Eihän ne muuta asioita mixikään. Ja tää on vielä Kansan Uutisista. Herran pelko on kiinni kansassa kuin kärpäspaperi. Koska niistä päätellään salaa eteenpäin: jos sielu on vaan harmoniaa, mites käy mulle jatkossa? Enxmä ookkaan kuolematon? Katoanko kuin löyhkä, kuin pieru Saharaan? Huolestuttavaa. Tai mikä pahempaa: jos anoppi on vaan joku konglomeraatti, eikös panna se tehosekottimeen? Apinat on kuin koiria, ei ne ymmärrä sanoja, ne kuuntelee äänensävyä.
ellauri024.html on line 1378: von Wright muistuttaa kaikkien poliisivaltioiden kaikkia ylijohtajia myös kielenkäytöltään tuomitessaan ja leimatessaan "vieraantumisesta" tai jostain muista tsykologisista syistä johtuvia "irrationaalisia käyttäytymiskaavoja", jotka uhkaavat "lakiin perustuvaa järjestystä" (Law and Order): "kielteinen menettely, holtiton kielteisyys, kumouxellinen maanvieremä, romanttinen todellisuuspako, nihilismin purkauxet, sokea viha". Puuttuu vaan "menneisyyden ihannointi". Mut sekin tulee sanotux.
ellauri030.html on line 535: Elukatkin voi ymmärtää, mut vaan nää sapajut osaa järkeillä. Parasta järkeilyä on pessimismi. Maailma on läpeensä paha, siis se ei ole kunnossa, niinkun pitäisi (maailmantahdon, siis mun, mielestä ainaskin). Huonompaa maailma ei vois ollakaan. (Voltairen Candidessa oltiin just vastakkaista mieltä, inhottavia optimisteja.) Se on aivan hel-vetin huono. Surkea. Maailma on Jammertal, täynnä kärsimystä. Puudeli kakkaa sohvalle ja kusee jalalle. Onni on vain kuvitelmaa, lysti negatiivista. Schopenhauer on pahempi nyrpistelijä kuin saxalainen autobaanaa hurjasteleva unbefriedigte Frau. Elämä heiluu kuin pendeli tuskan ja ikävystymisen väliä. Tik-tusskaa, tak-tyyylsää. Pahinta on se et aina panettaa. Schopenhauer saisi täydet pisteet pessimismitestistä. Mihkäs se kuoli? Keuhkotulehduxeen. Ei siis sydixeen, vastoin Pänkäläisen ennustuxia.
ellauri033.html on line 653: So far so good. Kamat pussissa. Mut mites sitten suu pannaan kun on pussit tyhjinä? Omne animal ja niin edespäin. No juu, just niin, kun pussit on kevennetty, ajatus izemurhasta alkaa tuntua aika turhalta. Ja kuinkas ollakkaan, Polle sanoo tässä kohtaa juuri näin: Omne animal! Vitun kusipää. Oikeassa ehkä mutta silti vittu. Hauska pikku vinjetti: Greslou vetää housut jalkaan äkkiä ettei näyttäisi naurettavalta byysät nilkoissa jatkopeleissä. Pollelle tästä pisteitä.
ellauri037.html on line 109: Vauzivau, jäätävää, LOL, mä hajoon. Tai mites se tällä haavaa sanotaan.

ellauri039.html on line 432: Eli lopultakin asiaan: mites tällä voi nyt rikastua? Mitä uusia bisnesmahixia nyt kun ei ole muuri esteenä ja historia on lopussa, kuten huomauttaa Jokohama Fukuyama (1952, siis mun ikäinen), saxen kanssa riehunutta sievää leidiä 19 vuotta vanhempi Yodan näköinen Stanfordin neropatti?
ellauri051.html on line 1643: 1035 (They bore mites as for unfledg'd birds who have now to rise and fly and sing for themselves,) 1035 (He kantoivat punkkeja kuin lentäneet linnut, joiden täytyy nyt nousta ja lentää ja laulaa itselleen,)
ellauri063.html on line 253: "Ajattelu voi olla myös kokonaan läpäisemätöntä, järjelle käsittämätöntä, puhetta jonka sisältö ei lainkaan avaudu muille kuin puhujalle izelleen (mites sekään avautuminen sitten ilmenee? - kustannustoim.huom.) Psykiatrit voivat tällöin puhua psykoottisesta ajattelusta ja tarjota Tom Arnkilin dialogiterapiaa. Oisko tällänen sisäinen maailma, johka ulkopuoliset ei löydä reittiä, sitä varsinaista toisinajattelua, jolle EXTRA tässä tarjoo kehyxiä?" (s. 339)
ellauri072.html on line 204: The problems of Dante's treatment of the punishment of homosexuals in Hell and of his more surprising salvation of still other (unnamed) homosexuals in Purgatory have had two recent responses that restore a central fact: cantos 15 and 16 of Inferno and canto 26 of Purgatorio are in fact concerned with this issue. Boswell's pages insisting on the identity of the sexual sin punished in Inf. 15-16 and the lust repented on the seventh terrace {"Dante and the Sodomites," 65-67} are convincing. "Soddoma" is used clearly to identify homosexual activity in Purg. 26 (vv. 40 and 79) and thus makes clear its meaning in Inf. 11.50 and therefore the nature of the sin encountered in Inf. 15 and 16.
ellauri072.html on line 209: Nowhere else in Hell, after Limbo, do we hear such affection expressed for damned souls. And, given the fact that these are sodomites, Dante's desire to embrace them has a strange reverberation.
ellauri072.html on line 216: As we see in Inferno 15-16, in Hell Dante damns sodomites as sinners of violence against nature. Nonetheless, even in his Hell, where Dante does not go so far as to include homosexuals as unrepentant lustful in the second circle, he still desexualizes his treatment of sodomy. What do we learn from all this? Yet the fact that here, as in Purg. 26, he chooses to put homosexuals in a good light when there was no apparent compelling reason for him to do so surely should cause us to ask further questions about Dante's views concerning homosexuality. Varmaan se oli homo izekin, Beatrice or no Beatrice. Sixkai sille riitti vaan ulista siitä Beatricesta. Satis enim dictum erat de tam obscena et tam spurca materia.
ellauri079.html on line 191: Platonin nimissä säilyneitä kirjeitä on teosten kokoelmassa 13. Ne ovat varsin erilaisia ja eripituisia. Monet vaikuttavat puhtailta mielikuvituxen tuotteilta. (No mites se eroaa Platonin muusta tuotannosta?) Moni seikka viittaa siihen, että pitkä VII kirje, jossa on Platonin typerän poliittisen toiminnan puolustus, on ainoa joka on kirjoitettu hänen omasta aloitteestaan ennen hänen kuolemaansa v 347 eKr. Loput ovat tod.näk. epäperäisiä.
ellauri109.html on line 611: The reaction to “Portnoy’s Complaint,” a decade later, was of another order. “This is the book for which all anti-Semites have been praying,” Gershom Scholem, the eminent scholar of Jewish history and mysticism, wrote. “I daresay that with the next turn of history, which will not be long delayed, this book will make all of us defendants at court.”
ellauri111.html on line 488: The Lord Jesus Christ came to save you from both the GUILT and POWER of sin. The Lord Jesus Christ was manifested TO DESTROY the works of the devil (I John 3:8)--THE LORD JESUS CHRIST CAME TO SAVE YOU AND CHANGE YOU AND TO MAKE YOU HOLY. When you are unsaved, sin has dominion over you. Sin is your boss and you cannot do anything BUT sin. You are justly under the wrath of a holy and just God. Murderers, thieves, fornicators, witches, sodomites, whores, liars, lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God, rebels, and all other spiritual lepers will not inherit the kingdom of God. This is not to put anybody down, before we got saved, we Christians were once the murders, thieves, whoremongers, etc. We have to be born again into the kingdom of God. When we REPENT and BELIEVE in Jesus, we are born again and all things become new. A new life emerges and things change. We start reading the Bible and obeying it and the Lord Jesus helps us obey it more and more. Our life changes. Our desires literally change as we go forward in obeying the word of God.
ellauri145.html on line 513: “I will have all antisemites shot.”
ellauri151.html on line 134: In his journal, Gide distinguishes between adult-attracted "sodomites" and boy-loving "pederasts", categorizing himself as the latter.
ellauri151.html on line 136: I call a pederast the man who, as the word indicates, falls in love with young boys. I call a sodomite ("The word is sodomite, sir," said Verlaine to the judge who asked him if it were true that he was a sodomist) the man whose desire is addressed to mature men. […] The pederasts, of whom I am one (why cannot I say this quite simply, without your immediately claiming to see a brag in my confession?), are much rarer, and the sodomites much more numerous, than I first thought. […] That such loves can spring up, that such relationships can be formed, it is not enough for me to say that this is natural; I maintain that it is good; each of the two finds exaltation, protection, a challenge in them; and I wonder whether it is for the youth or the elder man that they are more profitable.
ellauri162.html on line 149: L´évolution de son antisémitisme est toujours débattue. Bernanos rend hommage à Édouard Drumont, avec lequel il partage sa détestation de la bourgeoisie, mais aussi l´association des juifs à la finance, aux banques, au pouvoir de l’argent au détriment du peuple, un thème qui fait florès dans la France de cette époque et qui suscite des propos antisémites de l´écrivain. Bernanos, qui a fait la guerre de 1914-1918, fustige aussi un patriotisme perverti qui humilie l´ennemi allemand dans la défaite au lieu de le respecter, trahissant ainsi l´honneur de ceux qui ont combattu et hypothéquant l´avenir. Täähän kuulostaa suorastaan Ezra Poundilta. «Les juifs traînent nonchalamment sur les colonnes de chiffres et les cotes un regard de biche en amour » ou « ces bonshommes étranges qui parlent avec leurs mains comme des singes ». J’aimerais mieux être fouetté par le rabbin d’Alger que faire souffrir une femme ou un enfant juif ». Juutalaiset kiistelevat vieläkin oliko Ykä hyvis vaiko pahis.
ellauri171.html on line 583: Simeon and Levi murder the Sichemites; Jacob forces Dinah to watch
ellauri171.html on line 642: Judges 19:15-26 describes what happened the night the couple stayed in Gibeah, a city of the Benjamites. When they entered the open square of the city an old man invited them to his home (Judges 19:16-21). While the old man and the Levite and his concubine were having dinner, we are told some “worthless fellows” surrounded the house and pounded on the door. Verses 22-24 describe the discussion that occurred with these “worthless fellows.”
ellauri171.html on line 896: Qos, national god of the Edomites.
ellauri184.html on line 357: Second, the fact that it is a theological issue does not prevent it from being a moral one as well. The behavior is sin. “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not deceived. Neither formicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6:9-10 ). The word translated “homosexuals” here strictly refers to catamites — the word has the connotation of soft. We would say swish. The other word sodomite refers to the “male” homosexual, the one playing the role of the male. All the ingenuity in the world cannot change what the Bible bluntly states here. As well, consider 1 Tim. 1:10 . “. . . for fornicators, for sodomites . . . and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine.” The Old Testament speaks to this as well. See Deut. 23:17-18 , Job 36:14 , Lev. 18:22 . Those guilty of such things are living in a contemptible way, and the Scripture calls them dogs. Poor dogs.
ellauri184.html on line 364: When God is pleased to grant reformation and revival in our time, this will mean that our churches will begin to fill up with cleansed and forgiven sodomites. Can't say for sure about the catamites, thery're so swishy.
ellauri185.html on line 131: David captures Jerusalem and brings the Ark there. David wishes to build a temple, but Nathan tells him that one of his sons will be the one to build the temple. David defeats the enemies of Israel, slaughtering Philistines, Moabites, Edomites, Syrians, and Arameans.
ellauri185.html on line 400: 36. Mixi me olemme hyviä ja nuo toiset pahoja? Meitä molempia kannustaa izekkyys. No jo oli aivopieru siinäkin. Kovaa peliä Bostonissa, dumari siteeraa Shakespearea tuomitessaan kiltin venäläisen terroristin kuolemaan. Koko artikkeli lähtee puuhun perä edellä. Sekä hyviin että pahoihin tekoihin kannustaa altruismi, joka on vain naamioitua izekkyyttä. Voi helvatti, kuka näin paskaa kirjottaa? joku Graham Lawless, varmaan Wilcockin heimolaisia. Tyyppi ei lainkaan premissoi mitä se tarkoittaa tässä hyvällä ja pahalla käytöxellä. Epäizekkäitä tekoja tehdään sukulaisille ilman aihetta ja kavereille vastavuoroisuuden toivossa. Mitä pahaa siinä on? "Terroristin" mielestä Islamin puolesta oli ok vammauttaa ja tappaa amerikkalaisia. Se oli hyvin paha! Amerikkalaisten mielestä oli ok vammauttaa ja tappaa kasapäin rättipäitä Irakissa ja Syyriassa. Se oli hyvä! Revi siitä huumoria.
ellauri189.html on line 324: Ei kansakunnan koti ole mikä tahansa maapläntti, vaan se kokonaisuus, missä eletään, rakastetaan ja vanhennutaan. Jokainen haluaa puolustaa vanhainkotiaan, ja siksikin siihen on kaikilla oikeus - ja velvollisuus. Hyökkäävä eli väkivallan aloittava vihollinen on rikollinen, eikä mikään lähimmäinen. Ei kukaan sano raiskausta yrittävällekään, että "mites on päivä menny?", silloin kun tilanne on päällä. Mieluumminkin "onxe edes siellä kun ei mitään tunnu". On täysin järjetöntä asettaa hyökkääjää ja puolustajaa samalle viivalle, kun kyse on totaalisista vastakohdista. Näin sanoi jo vaippahousuinen Mahatma Gandhikin, on kirjahyllyssä se kirja.
ellauri238.html on line 275: Mut hetkinen! Perhetaustaltaan molemmat oli jonkinlaisia laskukkaita persuja, ryssävihaisia oikeistohörhöjä, mites sitten Pena päätyi kommunistiseen puolueeseen? Ihan kiusallako? Niimpä kai, kun on pohjalla kaikki tiet on ylöspäin. Juu Pertti ja Tuula-Liina on ihan kuin Marquetta ja Paula, molempien kotona oli luuranko kaapissa: Tuula2n isän suikki ja Simon viinapää.
ellauri244.html on line 322: No mites muille virhe-yhdistyxen kiipijöille sitten kävi?
ellauri258.html on line 554: Jotkut tutkijat ovat ehdottaneet, että Baba Yagan käsitteeseen vaikuttivat itäslaavilaiset yhteydet suomalais-ugrilaisiin ja siperialaisiin kansoihin. Karjalaisessa Syöjätärissä on Baba Yagan piirteitä, mutta vain kielteisiä, kun taas muissa karjalaisissa tarinoissa Baba Yagan kaltaisia ​​hyödyllisiä rooleja voi esittää hahmo nimeltä akka ( "vanha nainen"). Manne sanoi Ansua akaxi ihan hyvässä mielessä, mitä iso Pauli ei järin arvostanut. Hän on pelattava maaginen hahmo Smitessä. Tässä yhteydessä sopii mainita myös Akka Kebnekaiselainen.
ellauri263.html on line 449: Hebron is considered one of the oldest cities in the Levant. According to the Bible, Abraham settled in Hebron and bought the Cave of the Patriarchs as a burial place for his wife Sarah. Biblical tradition holds that the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, along with their wives Sarah, Rebecca, and Leah, were buried in the cave. Hebron is also recognized in the Bible as the place where David was anointed king of Israel. Following the Babylonian captivity, the Edomites settled in Hebron. During the first century BCE, Herod the Great built the wall which still surrounds the Cave of the Patriarchs, which later became a church, and then a mosque. With the exception of a brief Crusader control, successive Muslim dynasties ruled Hebron from the 6th century CE until the Ottoman Empire's dissolution following World War I, when the city became part of British Mandatory Palestine. A massacre in 1929 and the Arab uprising of 1936–39 led to the emigration of the Jewish community from Hebron. The 1948 Arab–Israeli War saw the entire West Bank, including Hebron, occupied and annexed by Jordan, and since the 1967 Six-Day War, the city has been under Israeli military occupation. Following Israeli occupation, Jewish presence was reestablished at the city. Since the 1997 Hebron Protocol, most of Hebron has been governed by the Palestinian National Authority.
ellauri264.html on line 87: L’explication que donne Rolland à son refus de se jeter dans la bataille pour défendre Dreyfus n’est pas convaincante. Les raisons se situent ailleurs : elles relèvent, d’une part, d’une forme d’individualisme qui refuse toute association politique de peur de compromissions inévitables, et, d’autre part, de ses sentiments antisémites.
ellauri302.html on line 724: Heräsin tiistaiaamuna siihen kun Merikadun talo kallistui tuulenpuuskassa ja kaatui kumoon ilman suurempia vahinkoja. Meillä oli lapsenlapset hoidossa, ne vaan vähän ihmettelivät että mites mummila on nyt tälleen sivusuunnassa.
ellauri317.html on line 316: Tout le mond savait que l´intérêt délibéré pour la femme de Pouchkine n´était qu´un écran derrière lequel le Français cachait des détails secrets de sa vie personnelle. Le terrain fertile pour de telles rumeurs était la relation entre d´Anthès et l’émissaire du roi hollandais, le baron Louis Heeckeren, qui avait adopté le jeune homme après son arrivée dans l´Empire russe. Quoi qu’il en soit, d´Anthès avait trop fortement harcelé Natalia et dépassé toutes les limites.
ellauri370.html on line 88: According to the Hebrew Bible, Amalek was the son of Eliphaz (himself the son of Esau, ancestor of the Edomites and the brother of Israel) and Eliphaz's concubine Timna. Timna was a Whorite and sister of Lotan. According to a midrash, Timna was a princess who tried to convert to Judaism. However, she was rejected by Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. She replied she would rather be a handmaiden to the dregs of Israel than be a mistress of another gentile nation. To punish the Patriarchs for their attitudes, Timna birthed Amalek, whose descendants would cause Israel much distress. This Amalek was also the product of an incestuous union since Eliphaz was Timna's stepfather, according to 1 Chronicles 1:36, after he committed adultery with the wife of Seir the Horite, who was Timna's biological father. First-century Roman-Jewish scholar and historian Flavius Josephus refers to Amalek as a "bastard" (νόθος) in a derogatory sense. 'Amalek' oli vähän kuin 'Vanja' suomalaisille.
ellauri384.html on line 422: Jooseppi väittää että "Sokrates", no, Plato, kexi kuolemattoman sielun 400-luvulla eKr. Oliskohan näin. Platonin argumentit Faidonissa Simmiaan ja Kebeen (vai kenenkä se nyt oli) harmoniamallia vastaan (kz. albumi 30) oli aivan olemattomat, eli niitä ei vaan ollut. Samaa katteetonta toiveikkuutta vaan kuin muillakin narsisteilla. Vaan mites juutalaisilla?
ellauri412.html on line 203: 1 King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh’s daughter - Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians and Hittites. 2 They were from nations about which the Lord had told the Israelites, “You must not intermarry with them, because they will surely turn your hearts after their gods.” Nevertheless, Solomon held fast to them in love. 3 He had seven hundred wives of royal birth and three hundred concubines, and his wives led him astray. 4 As Solomon grew old, his wives turned his heart after other gods, and his heart was not fully devoted to the Lord his God, as the heart of David his father had been. 5 He followed Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, and Molek the detestable god of the Ammonites. 6 So Solomon did evil in the eyes of theLord; he did not follow the Lord completely, as David his father had done. (1 Kings 11:1-6)
ellauri431.html on line 104: The tribe of Ephraim complained to Jephthah that he had not asked them to help him against the Ammonites, and they threatened to burn down his house. Jephthah replied that he had summoned them, but they had not reacted. Jephthah gathered an army of Gileadites and defeated the Ephraimites.
ellauri431.html on line 106: The Ephraimites tried to escape by crossing the river. The Gileadites, who controlled the approaches to the Jordan River, asked each one of the survivors if he was an Ephraimite.
ellauri431.html on line 108: If the man denied it, he was asked to say the word Shibboleth, a word that the Ephraimites pronounced as “Sibboleth.” If the man didn’t pronounce the word correctly, the Gileadites killed him. Approximately 42,000 Ephraimites were thus massacred. Wow that is less than got massacred in Gaza recently. Jephthah judged Israel for six years, until his death. He was buried in one of the cities of the region of Gilead.
ellauri434.html on line 197: Fond experiences like these, often transmitted uncritically by those of us who teach and write about Russian literature, could explain why Bulgakov’s English readers were surprised when, in 2022, his high school removed his blue plaque and the Ukrainian Writers’ Union proposed the closure of the Bulgakov Museum. The words of the dashing hero of The White Guard who describes Ukrainian as a “vile language that does not exist” were frequently quoted. Ukrainians and non-Ukrainians alike had questions: should one hold an author responsible for the speech of his fictional characters? What had Bulgakov got to do with Putin? The museum’s directors, in an irony-laden and deliberately anachronistic demand of their own, asked the Writer’s Union to first expel Bulgakov from their ranks for “anti-Soviet activity”. But, given Russia’s deliberate policy of destroying places of cultural significance to Ukraine, and having read “Kiev — town” which is voiced by the author rather than a fictional character, I found myself in sympathy with victimless and limited actions to ‘cancel’ Bulgakov. I remembered how antisemitism is exclusively reserved for Ukrainian characters in The Day of the Turbins; how in Upton’s version Ukrainians celebrate victories with “a huge, ugly, violent cheer” while the Turbin family make lyrical toasts and sing. Bulgakov’s Ukrainians are the fictional predecessors of the fictional enemy imagined today by the Russian government, media, and its audiences: a Ukrainian population of antisemites and fascists. In fact, Bulgakov’s actual Ukrainian contemporaries, who are not represented in The Day of the Turbins, were both eloquent and courageous in speaking truth to power. A transcript exists of a conversation in 1929 between Stalin and a delegation of Ukrainian writers who requested The Day of the Turbins be cancelled due to its dangerous propagation of Great-Russian chauvinism. Stalin did not disagree with their interpretation of the play but reasoned that the Ukrainians’ concerns were insignificant given its potential to convince proletarian audiences that even the most reactionary White Guards (and authors) could become Bolsheviks. The most basic material needs of Ukrainians were concurrently to be deemed insignificant with Stalin’s genocidal policies of collectivisation and the largely fictive Holodomor.
xxx/ellauri057.html on line 899: Il ecrit sous le titre « Le Péril juif », une série de 17 articles pugnaces, radicalement et fortement antisémites. Simenon méprisait également les grévistes, le mouvement dada, et manifestait un antisocialisme radical à relents populistes, un anticommunisme caustique et un antimaçonnisme de circonstance.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 270: Shem, a son of Noah, was the father of all the Semetic people (primarily Jews and Arabs). Elam was Shem’s oldest son (Genesis 10:22). He was born after the flood and was the patriarch of the Elamites. His descendants settled in the valley between the north eastern shore of the Persian Gulf and the Zagros Mountains, where some believe Noah’s ark might have come to rest.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 272: Elam’s capital city, Susa, was one of the world’s first post flood cities, and was a regional center off and on for many centuries before being destroyed by Ashurbanipal, the last of the great Assyrian Kings, in 647 BC. As was the custom of Assyrian kings, he removed many of the surviving Elamites from their homeland. He took them to the former Northern Kingdom of Israel, which had been conquered by Assyria 74 years earlier, where they were resettled among the Israelites who remained there.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 277: WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? A case can be made for the view that “Persian” and “Elamite” are not two names for the same people but that having conquered Elam, Persia became the successor to Elam, whose original inhabitants, as Jeremiah’s prophecy indicates, have been scattered to the four winds and absent from the pages of history for over 2,500 years. Evidence of the difference in origin between the Elamites and the Persians came from the mouth of none other than Persian King Darius the Great who said, “I am Darius, the great king, the king of kings, the king of many countries and many people, the king of this expansive land, the son of Wishtaspa of Achaemenid, Persian, the son of a Persian, ‘Aryan’, from the Aryan race” (From Darius the Great’s Inscription in Naqshe-e-Rostam).
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 278: Some scholars say Iran means “land of the Aryans” and claim that the Iranians are not descendants of Shem, as the Elamites were, but more likely came from Japeth, whose descendants are mostly Caucasians. This supports the view that Elam and Persia are not different names for the same people. Also, the native languages of the two groups were different.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 279: This may explain why Ezekiel, who wrote from Babylon at the same time Jeremiah was writing from Jerusalem, identified one of the major participants in the Battle of Ezekiel 38 as being Persia, and not Elam. God might have informed him, as He did Jeremiah, that the Elamites would be conquered and scattered to the four winds by their Persian neighbors.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 285: WHAT HAPPENED TO ELAM? There’s no record of a re-emergence of the Elamites since the Persian conquest 2500 years ago. Some say Jeremiah 49:39 is currently being fulfilled through the Iranians. They say this partly because Iran’s primary nuclear facilities are in the area once called Elam. Its recently completed nuclear reactor in Bushehr lies on the eastern shore of the Persian Gulf in the heart of ancient Elam. If that’s the case then God’s restoration of Elam’s fortunes is both brief and haphazard, its stated purpose is opposed to God’s plan for Israel, and it is doomed to end in even more destruction.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 290: But from my research it appears that the only part of Jeremiah’s prophecy that remains a question mark is verse 39. The Elamites were defeated and scattered among the nations just as Jeremiah predicted. The nation ceased to exist and there’s been no mention of them since.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 339: Edom was first welcomed as an ally in the Babylonian conquest of Judah, but Babylon soon turned on them and conquered them, too (Obadiah 1:7-9). God repaid Edom’s treachery against Israel (Obadiah 1:10-14) with Babylon’s treachery against Edom. The Edomites were destroyed and their lands were taken over by the Nabateans, a desert tribe from the south.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 382:

Q: I have a question regarding the descendants of Edom. In Joel Rosenberg’s novel The Ezekiel Option, some Iranians claim that they are descended from the Edomites and that Iran is in danger of God’s judgment upon the edomites. Are some Iranians descended from Edom? And if so, could Obadiahs prophecy against Edom be a warning for Iran? Thanks for your ministry and God bless.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 384: A: The Iranians are the modern day Persians who originated in Elam, not Edom. Edom was the birthplace of the Ammonites and the Moabites and was later inhabited by the family of Esau, Jacob’s brother. Edom got its name from Esau, and is called Jordan today. Elam was located further east on the other side of Iraq, where Iran is today. Obadiah prophesied against the Edomites who were driven out of their capital (Petra) by the Nabateans, a Bedouin people descended from Ishmael, in fulfillment of Obadiah’s prophecy. Many believe that during the Great Tribulation, the Jordanians will hide believing Jews in Petra where God will protect them against the anti-Christ. The area is called Bosrah in Isaiah 63.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 676: The modern use derives from an account in the Hebrew Bible, in which pronunciation of this word was used to distinguish Ephraimites, whose dialect used a differently sounding first consonant. The difference concerns the Hebrew letter shin, which is now pronounced as [ʃ] (as in shoe). In the Book of Judges, chapter 12, after the inhabitants of Gilead under the command of Jephthah inflicted a military defeat upon the invading tribe of Ephraim (around 1370–1070 BC), the surviving Ephraimites tried to cross the River Jordan back into their home territory, but the Gileadites secured the river's fords to stop them. To identify and kill these Ephraimites, the Gileadites told each suspected survivor to say the word shibboleth. The Ephraimite dialect resulted in a pronunciation that, to Gileadites, sounded like sibboleth. In the King James Bible the anecdote appears thus (with the word already in its current English spelling):
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 678: And the Gileadites took the passages of Jordan before the Ephraimites: and it was so, that when those Ephraimites which were escaped said, Let me go over; that the men of Gilead said unto him, Art thou an Ephraimite? If he said, Nay;
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 680: Then said they unto him, Say now Shibboleth: and he said Sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce it right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at that time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 225: Hello 'Mari, how ya doin'? Hei Omari, mites menee?
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 93: Tässä albumissa palaan hahmojen, sankareiden ja niiden vastustajien luonteisiin. Tuli mieleen näät aamulla kun oli vielä pimeää et mites nää Jungin arkkityypit suhtautuu vanhoihin tähtimerkkeihin? No tietyst siitäkin löytyy netistä vaik mitä paasauxia. Tää Utelias Kuu vaikutti aika hyvältä. Kopsin sen nahkoineen karvoineen tähän ja suomensin.
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 418: Tää kuulostaa sarjayrittäjältä. Hyvin paha. Hän on täällä tänään. Tää on 1-sarvinen, joka työntää jäykän sarven pissaliisan syliin. Hmm, mites sitten tamma? Sillä Kirrsi Rriski (alias Kikka, Petzkun vaimo) on tämmönen. Ja Arto Samuli on ihan siinä viivalla.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 361: Ecological factors were also probably a precursor to eusociality. For example, the sponge-dwelling shrimp depend upon the sponge´s feeding current for food, termites depend upon dead, decaying wood, and naked mole rats depend upon tubers in the ground. These resources have patchy distributions in the environments of these animals. In places there is a surplus, in others next to nothing. This means that resources must be defended for the group to survive. These requirements make it a necessity to have high social order for the survival of the group.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 992: Indeed, it could be a parlor game on the order of listing the famous alcoholics in American literature: Name the 20th-century authors who were anti-Semites — Theodore Dreiser; Hemingway; F. Scott Fitzgerald (a little); Sinclair Lewis; Ezra Pound, of course; T. S. Eliot; William Faulkner; Thomas Wolfe — the list goes on.
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 365: Eliot was in love three times (not counting the catamites), and each of those loves became events in his artistic and spiritual lives – and two of the women involved were massively the worse for it. Vivien Eliot was a difficult woman, yet Eliot – who had connived at her affair with Bertrand Russell – treated her, with the agreement of his spiritual advisers, with a coldness that helped break her spirit, perhaps her mind. Emily Hale was the woman he deserted for Vivien; she spent her life at his encouragement waiting for Vivien to die, and it was in her presence that he had some of his deepest moments of spiritual intensity – yet she was eventually dismissed from his life with equal coldness. They were both central to his greatest works: Vivien to The Waste Land and Emily to much of The Four Quartets.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 129: Muutaman epsanjalaisen (ym dagon) saapuessa inkojen ja apteekkien suuret valtakunnat pettivät isänmaan asian, romahtivat ja antoivat keittää jumalansa ja kielensä. Jenkit nirhasivat viimeisenkin villin Kaliforniasta. Mustakallot heittää kivillä rikki Ruozin kansankodin ikkunat. Cokis ja kräkkäys tekee lopun Rurikin valtakunnasta. Kaikesta tulee vaan tollasta sekootusta, mitä pikku Helmi teki palestiinalaisten Jaffasta ja juutalaisten Coca-Colasta. No ei, Coca Cola owner Warren Buffett is not Jewish. He is a value investor, which means, simply put, he searches for bargains. And what is more Jewish than that? Although anti-Semites have tried to shame Jews for their ability to save money, the Jewish ability to bargain, to Jew down the price, is not a vice, but a great virtue. His son-in-law who runs the Buffett Foundation is a Jew, BTW.
xxx/ellauri228.html on line 126: Jos vastaat "en/ei", et varmaankaan vielä löytänyt oikeita lihaksia. Jatka etsimistä: sormitestin avulla löydät kyllä oikeat lihakset. Tarkista että reikä oli varmasti oikea. Sen pitäisi olla se etummaisempi, pissanhajuinen. Jumppaa välillä ja kokeile uudestaan, löysitkö jo oikeat lihakset..
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1567: Smites without sword, and scourges without rod;
xxx/ellauri268.html on line 312: Stewart on oikeassa tuomitessaan olennot ja väittäessään, että Rowling olisi voinut kuvitella peikkoja sellaisiksi, mitä hän halusi heidän olevan - pankkiirien koukkunenärotujen luominen ei ollut fiksu tulkinta kansanperinteestä, vaan yksinkertaisesti uusi tahra Harry Potterin sivuille.
xxx/ellauri388.html on line 151: Tässäkin on masentavinta se, että tehtyä ei enää voi peruuttaa. Ruiskahdus ja kamat pussissa, mites sen voi perua. Tavallisesti kun puhutaan itsesaastutuksesta, sitä pidetään ihan eri asiana kuin sukupuolivietin tyydyttämistä. Tosin on toinen luonnollinen ja toinen luonnoton tyydyttämisen tapa, mutta molempien vaikuttimena on kuitenkin aivan sama vietti. Vietin tyydyttäminen itsesaastutuksella on tosin niin sanottu "nuoruuden pahe", lasten pahe, mutta se on lasten pahe vaan sen vuoksi, ettei voi tulla kysymykseen lapsen tyydyttää viettiänsä luonnollisella tavalla, — että se on lapselle vielä ainoa keino tyydyttää sitä viettiä, joka hänessä ilmestyy näin aikaisena. Se vielä puuttuisi että kersat bylsisivät keskenään pyllyt ojossa. Tietysti me vanhempina voisimme vähän jelppiä...
xxx/ellauri415.html on line 50: Nylah Burton is a writer of good journalism and mediocre poetry. She has been described by racists and anti-Semites as “emotional, disrespectful, and volatile.” She thinks this is the best review of her writing she’s ever received. Her frigid grandma has it tattooed on her Fridgidaire. Here is what she writes:
xxx/ellauri415.html on line 52: I’d love for anti-Semites to keep out of my vagina, but also, these stereotypes are just fucking wrong. Take note, people: no shame = great sex. Except it is false to fact. Shame plays a big part in it.
xxx/ellauri436.html on line 89: Ihmiset kysyvät myös: C'est quoi la condition humaine selon Sartre ? À la place de la notion de « nature », Sartre propose celle de « condition humaine », c'est-à-dire un ensemble de « limites et de contraintes » commun à toute situation que nous vivons (Réflexions sur la question juive, 1946, p. 72). C’est notre condition de devoir choisir pour nous-mêmes une fin vers laquelle nous projeter.
68