ellauri039.html on line 760:
ellauri039.html on line 765: Forster ja Galsworthy menee mulla jotenkin sekaisin kuin Abbott ja Costello. Ei ihmekään, ne on aika samixet. Intellectual yet idiotic.
ellauri042.html on line 696: Dostoevsky´s literary work has strong autobiographical elements. We know from him that he suffered from hallucinations already in early childhood. He presented idiotic characters with confused views about freedom of choice, religion, socialism, atheism, good and evil. Many of his characters suffered – like the author himself – from epilepsy. Other famous people also suffered from epilepsy (Alexander the Great, Caesar, Gustave Flaubert, and Lord Byron). Flaubert had religiously tinted visions. The first 2 guys thought they were gods.
ellauri488.html on line 355: Anyone else hate Neil Gaiman's writing? Why do people like him? If you like Neil Gaiman it is cool ;) I have a visceral hatred of Neil Gaiman's books. I've read American Gods, half of Anasazi Boys, the idiotic book about the kid in the graveyard, child's comic Coraline, Sandman (maybe two hardcover volumes), and Study in Emerald. American Gods is rotten to the core. He somehow made the Gods dull. Every character is so lifeless, wooden. It is pretty hard to make the scheming of Odin boring. You did it, Neil! Well I'm going to go read some amazon reviews until I forget Gaiman exists for another few years. Edit: Thanks everyone for the replies! I don't want to insult people for their tastes, but I've got a better feel what is going on now through this conversation.
4