ellauri060.html on line 955: After Silverfish lost his face at alt-right, another hooknosed greedy Shylock cobbled together MeWe, a social networking app that claimed to fiercely protect user privacy. The genesis of the name, says Weinstein, is exactly what it sounds like: “My life is composed of me and then my ‘we'. Me and my wee 'thing' love our name. We get a lot of thumbs up on our brand: Make America Habitually Great."
ellauri106.html on line 76: In 1987, in the loneliness of Connecticut, Roth experienced a breakdown caused by a sleeping pill with hallucinatory side effects. He made the experience, as well as the trial of the concentration camp guard John Demjanjuk in Jerusalem, whom he had followed as an observer, the starting point of the 1993 novel Operation Shylock, the encounter between a fictional Philip Roth and his doppelganger. The writer also felt increasingly isolated in London and returned to New York, where he moved into an apartment on the Upper West Side. He took over from 1988 to 1991 a professor of literature at Hunter College of the City University of New York. In 1990 he married his longtime partner Claire Bloom, but the marriage was divorced in 1994 after Roth's growing estrangement and severe depression, including a stay in a psychiatric clinic. Bloom dealt with the problematic relationship two years later in her memoir Leaving a Doll's House .
ellauri109.html on line 873: Kun Roth kirjoitti roskakirjaa Operation Shylock, luullen siitä tulevan sen mestariteos, niiden välit parani, Roth järjesti Bloomille isot tunnekylläiset 62 vee synttärit. Bloom otti osaa Shylock-kirjan myyntikampanjaan, kun Rothia oli alkanut ääneen lukeminen pelottaa.
ellauri144.html on line 101: "They are subject to strong but quick-changing desires; they are hot-tempered, competitive..." Tähän asti mäzää Philip Roth Aristoteleen neonmainoxeen ollessaan elonsa vaelluxen puolitiessä, väsätessään maxanpalaan runkkaus -bestselleriä (Portnoyn tauti). Sen mielestä perhelounaaseen tuleminen oli sen koko elämän hirvein teko. Alkupää on varsin hauskaa jutkuviziä, mut niin pian kun se pääsee lapsenkengistä, alkaa Peppu luoda käärmeennahkansa ja ilmentää useimpia Aristoteleen presbyteerin piirteitä. Tyypillistä shylock-jutkuäijämeininkiä. Juu juu, juu, ei se varmaankaan ole rotupiirre, kai se on vanhan testamentin ja pitkän vainonnan aikaansaamaa meemilastia, mut silti vittu, mitä väliä.
ellauri144.html on line 533: Rothin eka vaimo Maggi oli sitä 4v vanhempi ruozalainen white trash keskilännestä. Sen isä oli vankilalintu joka ruuvas sitä pienenä. Se oli eronnut ja sen 2 lasta joutui X-miehelle. Se tuli raskaaksi (kenen toimesta?) 1957 mutta kaavittiin. Phil ois jättänyt sen mieluusti mut ei raaskinut koska niillä oli 2 vuoden lease. Phil oli varsinainen Shylock rahan suhteen. Philin äiskän kanssa meni suxet ristiin kun Maggi pyysi sitä pesemään sen pikkupyykkiä. Toinen raskaus 1959 toden sanoi ja Phillu suostui naimisiin kuha lapsi lähtee. (Se kävi ize kyyläämässä testitulokset. Little did he know et ne oli ostettu jonkun läskin mutiaisen pyllystä.) Phillu oli vaan äkäinen kun Maggi kääntyi juutalaisexi. Phillu oli 26 ja Maggi 30. Vakka löysi tässä joukkueessa kyllä kantensa.
ellauri183.html on line 134: Venezia kauppiaassa on joku Jessica. Niin se oli se juutalainen misu, Shylockin tytär. In the play, she elopes with Lorenzo, a penniless Christian, and a chest of her father's money, eventually ending up in Portia and Bassanio's household. In the play's dramatic structure, Jessica is a minor but pivotal role. Her actions motivate Shylock's vengeful insistence on his "pound of flesh" from Antonio; her relationships with Lorenzo and Shylock serves as a mirror and contrast to Portia's with Bassanio and with her father; her conversion to Christianity is the end of Shylock's line's adherence to the Jewish faith.
ellauri183.html on line 136: hylock_and_jessica_from_'the_merchant_of_venice'-7849.jpg" />
ellauri183.html on line 137:
Shylock ja Jessica kristittyjen silmin

ellauri183.html on line 142:
Shylock ja Jessica juutalaisten silmin

ellauri267.html on line 1320: Maurit kuvataan koko näytelmän ajan ryhmittymien repiminä ääliöinä, ja suurin uhka on keisarin suosikin Benducarin pyrkimys kaataa hänet valtaistuimelta, näennäisesti keisarin veljen Muley-Zeydanin hyväksi, mutta todellisuudessa itselleen. Tässä yrityksessä hän ottaa mukaan väestön uskonnollisen johtajan Mufti Abdallan ja Thoraxin, kristityn, joka on kääntynyt Sebastiania vastaan ja liittynyt maureihin. Borax liittyy myöhemmin Sebastianiin keisarin kaatumisen jälkeen voittaakseen kansannousun ja palauttaakseen arvokkaat johtajat paikoilleen. Koominen osajuoni sisältää kristityn vangin Don Antonion pyrkimykset paeta muftin kotitaloudesta tyttärensä Morayman ja hänen aarteensa kanssa samalla tavalla kuin Lorenzo ja Jessica pakenevat Shylockista Shakespearen Venetsian kauppiaassa (pr. 1604).
ellauri308.html on line 635: Shylock Englanti juutalaiset Juutalaiset ovat älykkäitä ja rahaa rakastavia; sixi juutalaisia pidettiin ahneina tai koronkiskoisina. Shakespearen näytelmän " Venetsialainen kauppias " hahmosta.
ellauri326.html on line 38: Se pilakuva oli kopio juutalaisen Levinen pilakuvasta 60-luvulta missä LBJ kumittaa mahastaan Vietnamin arpea. Joku jutku oli valittanut että sille tulee mieleen Shakespearen Shylock joka vaati lainan pantixi naulan Antonion goy persettä. Niin on jos siltä tuntuu, se riitti nostamaan punaisen antisemitismikortin.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 334: Pikku Lulussa oli pikku noita Pikku Syylä, jonka äiti oli ilkeämpi noita Iso Syylä. Shakespearella oli yhtä ilkeä jutku Shylock. Kazotaanpas lähemmin nyt tätä Syylökkiä. Nuorempana mä vähän niinkun sekotin sen Sherlock Holmesiin, mut nehän onkin aivan eri tyyppejä. Syylökki on tosi vaikee pala nimenomaan jenkeille, kuten alempana ilmenee.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 338: Shylock is a character in William Shakespeare's play The Merchant of Venice (c. 1600). A Venetian Jewish moneylender, Shylock is the play's principal antagonist. His defeat and conversion to Christianity form the climax of the story.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 342: Shakespeare is not necessarily judging him for his religious belief but demonstrating intolerance in both religions. Shylock refuses to eat with the Christians:
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 346: Shylock is sticking to his bond and to his word. He is true to his own code of conduct. Antonio signed that bond and promised that money, Shylock has been wronged; he has had his money stolen from him by his daughter and Lorenzo. However, Shylock is offered three times his money back and he still demands his pound of flesh; this moves him into the realms of villainy.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 348: American code of conduct: money talks, and triple bonus talks thrice as loud. Shylock is the model for Dickens' and Disneys Scrooges. Only they are Jews by courtesy only. In Donald Duck Scrooge is one of the good guys. So is Donald Trump.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 350: He is certainly left at the end of the play with very little to his name, although at least he is able to keep his property until his death. I think it would be difficult not to feel some sympathy for Shylock as all the goy characters celebrate at the end while he is all alone. It would be interesting to revisit Shylock in the years following and find out what he did next. Did he start to collect another big ball of thread.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 354: However, when we take into account circumstances that took place before the play, as well as what happens over the course of the plot, Shylock begins to seem a like a victim as well as a villain, and his fate seems excessively harsh. In addition to the abuse Antonio and other Christians routinely subject him to, Shylock lost his beloved wife, Leah. His daughter, Jessica, runs away from home with money and jewels she’s stolen from him, including a ring Leah gave him before she died. Although Solanio reports that Shylock’s was equally upset by the loss of his money as his daughter (“My daughter! O my ducats! O my daughter!” (II. Viii.), we must remember that we are getting a second-hand view through the eyes of an anti-Semitic character who compares Shylock to the devil. As we learn from Shylock himself, the Christians of Venice are happy to borrow money from him, but refuse to accept him as part of Venetian society because they equate his religion with Satan. Shylock has been treated as less than human his whole life, because he is not a Christian. Yet when he tries to collect on a loan, the other characters insist that he act like a Christian and forgive the debt.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 358: The stereotype of the Jew as a mean, dishonest money-grabbing individual has persisted, even into the twenty-first century. And Shakespeare has been accused of being anti-Semitic as a result of his portrayal of Shylock in that way in The Merchant of Venice.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 360: But nothing could be further from the truth. It is true that Shakespeare presents Shylock as a bitter, Christian-hating, money-grabbing, stingy man, dressed in the gabardine that set Jews apart from other citizens, but he gives Shylock a strong reason for hating Christians and wanting to get revenge for how they have treated him and the Jewish community.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 362: Shakespeare also gives us insight into the inner Shylock – not only his bitterness and anger but also his more sympathetic feelings such as the hurt he has experienced, his thoughts about the injustice of anti-Semitism and his isolation from normal society. Throughout the action of the play we see how nasty the Christians are – their shameless selfishness and brutal discrimination against Jews. Shakespeare makes Shylock’s hatred even more dramatic by having Shylock’s daughter elope with a Christian.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 368: He approaches Shylock and even while asking for help he is unforgivingly insulting to him. He tells him that his ships will be in the port in three days and then he will be able to pay. Shylock agrees to lend him the money. He says, just as a little gambling game, more or less as a little joke, if he isn’t repaid in three months Antonio should give him a pound of his flesh. Antonio agrees to that.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 370: The ships are lost in a storm and just at that time Shylock’s daughter, Jessica, runs off with a Christian, taking money and jewellery with her. Shylock, burning for revenge against the Christians generally, takes Antonio to court to claim his pound of flesh.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 372: The Duke doesn’t know how to deal with it but Basanio, successful in his suit, recruits his clever fiancé Portia, who is schooled in matters of law, to appear as a judge, disguised as a man. The trial takes place and Portia grants Shylock the pound of flesh, and counsels him to show mercy. Shylock takes out his knife to cut the flesh from the area close to Antonio’s heart and she stops him and tells him that it is against the law for anyone to shed a drop of Christian blood.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 374: Shylock pauses and she rules that for threatening the life of a Christian he will have to forfeit all his possessions and convert to Christianity.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 378: The play ends with an image of a miserable Shylock and the Christian community celebrating their victory in grand style.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 380: In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare is decidedly not anti-Semitic. It is just the opposite. We are definitely attracted to the Christians and we can see how horrific Shylock’s intention is but that is outweighed by the provocation he is subjected to: his social shunning, attempts to exploit him, daily insults about him and his religion, and the dramatic acts of the abduction of his daughter and the stealing of his property.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 382: Any writer who could write Shylock’s speech about being a Jew can see the anti-Semitic dialectic of his time for what it was. Shakespeare was far more in tune with the twenty-first century attitude than the sixteenth and seventeenth century view.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 384: Two young Christian layabouts encounter Shylock just after his daughter has run off with Lorenzo. He is highly distraught but they mock him. He is furious and it all comes out at last.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 401: In the way Shakespeare ends the play he shows how deeply-rooted anti-Semitism was in his time. A Twenty-first century audience will feel sorry for Shylock but an Elizabethan audience would probably have cheered.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 405:
Top Shylock Quotes

xxx/ellauri059.html on line 432: “Shylock, we would have moneys”—you say so,
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 519: He returns to Venice with Bassanio on his mission to rescue Antonio, and gives his tongue free rein during the trial, spitting out invective against Shylock, and then mercilessly mocking him once the carpet is pulled out from under
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 520: him. (American Jews hold a grudge against Bill on account of Shylock.)
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 76: Mixture of kindness and cruelty. Juutalaista menoa, ihan kuin Jehova. Anna Steiger muka löi ja potki äiskyä nimellä "kike bitch". (Rod Steiger oli goy.) Ritarillinen Roth puuttui asiaan ja kielti käyttämästä sellaista kieltä äidistä. Kike se oli izekin. Sen se ottikin izeensä. Siitä lähtien se ja Anna oli enemyjä kuin David ja filistealaiset. Annasta tuli oopperalaulaja. Roth muutti ulos muttei Lontoosta koska se oli vuokrannut molemmat kämppänsä ja oli muka vieläkin "hopelessly devoted to you". Mutta renting an apt in London would have disastrous tax consequences, advised an American lawyer. Phil oli varsinainen Shylock. I´m not going to be defeated by this kid, se murisi kuin karhu erauspennulle. Annalle tehtiin oma koppi pimeästi Clairen huoneiston nurkkaan (Clairen rahoilla). Säästyihän sekin penni.
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 374: Pepulla "ei ole käyttöä" Clairelle kun se ei tahdo nieleskellä Pilin runkkua. Jopa tuli Pililtä narsistinen lause sepitettyä. Claire ei alistu kun sitä alistetaan. Mitähän mamma Roth olis sanonut. Peppu olis saanut pelle-Hermannilta vizaa paljaalle pyllylle. Mutta jos Claire ei alistu ketäs silloin alistetaan? Ånej! Peppua! Men det går ju alldeles inte an! Roth on Daavid Shylock Fagin ja Harari fourpackina, se edustaa toxista telttajuutalaisuutta pahimmillaan.
xxx/ellauri268.html on line 343: Probably the most influential greedy Jewish caricature after Shakespeare’s Shylock is Charles Dickens’ Scrooge. Scrooge (as many Jewish writers have pointed out) is a miser with an obviously Jewish name (Ebenezer) and a pointed nose. He doesn’t celebrate Christmas and needs to be converted to charity and piety. It’s not especially subtle.
xxx/ellauri305.html on line 257: Kaikki muslimit ovat Allahin asialla. Ariel pääsi Karmela Belinkin housuihin vasta vuoden yritettyään, kapisella vaahtomuovipatjalla pani nuohoten sitä talon kellarissa Karmelan huokuessa hänen korvaansa. Itikat suosivat puuskuttavia. Vuonna 1984 Bélinki esitti Helsingin yliopistossa väitöskirjaksi englanninkielisen tutkimuksen naisasialiikkeen historiasta. Tutkimus sai painoluvan, mutta väitöstilaisuudessa molemmat vastaväittäjät ehdottivat sen hylkäämistä. Tapausta puitiin myöhemmin muun muassa väittelijän oikeusturvan kannalta. Bélinki väitteli myöhemmin tanskalaisessa Knightsbridgen yliopistossa. Knightsbridgen yliopiston tutkintoja ei tunnusteta edes Tanskassa. Tanskan korkeakoulu- ja tiedeministeriö kielsi Knightsbridgeltä "university"-nimikkeen käytön vuonna 2010. Bélinki toimi 1980-luvun alussa Helsingin kaupunginvaltuustossa aluksi rannikkoruozalaisten kääpiöpuolueen ryhmässä, mutta siirtyi 1980 kesken kauden kokoomuksen valtuustoryhmään. Julkaisuja: Shylock i Finland: judarna och Finlands litteratur 1900-1970. Åbo Akademi 2000. Karmela on Pikin ikätoveri, varmaan jo puuskuttaakin ja pilkkii sohvalla.
39