ellauri021.html on line 977: Atheists are experiencing a web marketing BEAT DOWN! The Christian internet evangelism organization Global Media Outreach indicates that as of September 2019 over 1,900,000,000 gospel visits have occurred via their websites. On the other hand, no atheist organization has ever accomplished such a web marketing feat. Is atheism boring or are atheists bad digital marketers who have difficulty understanding search engine algorithms? Or is it both? Oh atheists, feel the sting!
(Lue: Jumalakin laskee lampaansa googlen avulla. Ateistit ei osaa ketkuilla kuolleilla sieluilla. Tai sit niitä ei vaan hirveesti kiinnosta. Mitäs ruoskia kuollutta hevosta. Evankelistat on siinä ihan proo.)
ellauri028.html on line 671:

Alaviite: Mikko Kuustonen on 60v gospellaulaja, kaivosmiehen poika kuten Tom Jones. Soololevy Profeetta. Yksityiselämä (Muokkaa): Kuustonen oli naimisissa Marita Kuustosen kanssa 32 vuotta. Heidän avioeronsa astui voimaan keväällä 2014. Toukokuussa 2018 Mikko Kuustonen avioitui koreografi Hannabrotheruksen (s. 1968) kanssa. Hanna os. Saloheimo tulee täysin pystymezästä julkkisskenen ulkopuolelta. He ovat molemmat impulsiivisia ja yliempaattisia. Heillä on tv-ohjelma julkkisten rakkauselämästä. He haastattelee julkkisystäviä ja kuulee mikä liima saa suhteen kestämään. Ois Kuustostenkin ollut hyvä ostaa sitä putkilo. Minkä jumala on liimannut sitä älköön ihminen irrottako. He laittavat izensäkin likoon. Kyllä siinä moni liima irtoaa. Kuustosella on siitä pitkä kokemus. Hän on itse kertonut julkisuudessa päihdeongelmistaan, mutta on ollut raittiina v 2004. Varmaan vielä sietämättömämpi selvänä. Hän on kuulunut nuorena herätysliikkeeseen ja sixi kärsinyt myöhemmin myös muista mielenterveysongelmista. Kuustonen on kertonut olevansa värisokea. Siitä kaikki ongelmat alkoivat. Näki maailman mustavalkoisena väri-tvn aikana. Koiratkin on värisokeita. Vieläköhän se pieree yhtä kovaa Hannan seurassa. - Mikko! Hanna Brotheruxen poika Johannes on myös huumekoukussa. Haisteleekohan se liimaa. Mikko Kuustonen ja Hanna Brotherus muuttivat yllättäen avioehtoaan – Mitä tapahtuu ökymökille? Mikko Kuustonen ja Hanna Brotherus 2022: Ero! Mikko Kuustoselta paljonpuhuva reaktio Hanna Brotheruksen pieraisuun eron jälkeen. Musti!!
ellauri079.html on line 115: Ellie May Clampett was unable to do much more in getting her career to take off. She went on to become a gospel singer for a while and even practiced real estate for a bit. But nothing ever really kept her from going back to show business as she felt that this was where she belonged. Ellie May passed away from pancreatic cancer in 2015.
ellauri093.html on line 207: Another less clear difference between assemblies lies in their approaches to collaborating with other Christians. Many Open Brethren will hold gospel meetings, youth events, or other activities in partnership with non-Brethren Evangelical Christian churches. More conservative Brethren tend to not support activities outside their own meetings.
ellauri093.html on line 209: All assemblies welcome visitors to gospel meetings and other gatherings, with the exception of the Lord's Supper. Many Exclusive Brethren and some of the more traditional Open Brethren feel that the Lord's Supper is reserved for those who are in right standing before God. Fellowship in the Lord's Supper is not considered a private matter but a corporate expression, "because we, being many, are one loaf, one body; for we all partake of that one loaf" (1 Corinthians 10:17).
ellauri094.html on line 92: Kari Syreeni argues that the gospel is a heavily reworked edition of an earlier Johannine work, and that the original did not include Jesus' passion. Syreeni theorizes that the original gospel ended at Chapter 12, with the notion of Jesus' disappearance from the world, and that the passion narrative was incorporated by a later editor freely using the existing gospels of Mark and Matthew.
ellauri094.html on line 94: Syreeni suggests that the letters of John - written after the predecessor gospels but before the final edition - reveal a schism in the Johannine community that was caused by the majority faction's acceptance of Jesus' death and resurrection, as it was then recorded in the new gospel. By exploring the gospel's different means of legitimizing the passion story, such as the creation of the 'Beloved Disciple' to witness Jesus' passion, and the foreshadowing of the resurrection of Jesus in the miracle of Lazarus, Syreeni provides a bold and provocative case for a new understanding of John.
ellauri111.html on line 363: Hey you there in the back, look alive! Yes I mean you! You are about to read the most important information that you will ever read. It is called the gospel of Jesus Christ! (May be we oughta have capitalized that.)
ellauri111.html on line 365: The gospel is God's last message to mankind. If you will yield to the gospel of Jesus Christ, you will be reconciled to God and you will escape eternal damnation in hell and the lake of fire. Besides all of this, you will have abudant life right now as you walk with the Creator of the universe, the Lord Jesus Christ. All of this in spite of all the woes that the world will throw at you.
ellauri111.html on line 381: To get into heaven, you have to REPENT of your sins and BELIEVE the gospel of Jesus Christ (ref. Mark 1:15). You have to REPENT of your sins--that means turn from them and BELIEVE that Jesus died for your sins, was buried, and rose again on the third day. Having done these things, you will be born again and the Lord Jesus Christ will help you to walk uprightly. You will read the word (the Authorized King James Bible) and follow the teachings of Jesus. The word of God will wash your mind and your desires will actually change as you obey what you read. [Beware of church buildings and the internet--there are many false gospels in the world today. Read the Bible for yourself. There is a sound Overview of the Bible at this link.]
ellauri111.html on line 584: You don't need a preacher in your presence in order to be saved, you have heard the gospel here. Do you BELIEVE it and want it? Are you ready to be under God's commands or do you want to keep on doing what you want to do? This decision is yours and your future depends on what choice you make.
ellauri111.html on line 586: If you know that this is the truth, I counsel you to make your decision today because tomorrow is not promised to you, or the price may have gone up. Not only people´s hearts get hard when they keep on rejecting the truth. I could say from my own experience what else tends to get hard but I won´t. You don´t want your heart to turn to stone to the gospel because if it does, you will go to hell. That I can guarantee you because the Bible says so. Hell is real notwithstanding the fake preachers and "theologians" and "doctors" that would tell you otherwise.
ellauri111.html on line 630: Read the Bible. You need to start reading the Authorized (King James) Bible of 1611 daily. You can read it online or download it at this link--begin with the gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John and the New Testament. THESE ARE THE END TIMES AND BIBLE PUBLISHERS WHICH WERE ONCE TRUSTWORTHY NO LONGER ARE. I ENCOURAGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD AND PRINT OUT AND BIND YOUR OWN AUTHORIZED KING JAMES BIBLES. THERE IS A GREAT, ACCURATE, FREE DOWNLOAD AT THIS LINK. EACH CHRISTIAN AND EACH CHURCH SHOULD DO THIS WHILE THERE IS STILL TIME. Go to this link for a sound Overview of the Bible.
ellauri151.html on line 704: 1. Preached the gospel of the kingdom1. Preached the gospel of the grace of God
ellauri151.html on line 724: Those who believed the gospel of the kingdom, that Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of God, were known as followers of the Way (Acts 9.2, 19.9, 23, 22.4, 24.14, 22). They were not Christians. Christianity did not begin within the borders of Israel; it began outside its borders. Paul was saved outside Israel on his way to Damascus (Acts 9.3-6). Believers first became known as Christians in Antioch, not Jerusalem (Acts 11.25-26).
ellauri151.html on line 765: Edgar Jones has manufactured the following comparison of Jesus' and Paul's meaning differences which exposes Paul as a liar and a false prophet who did not know Jesus. Paul's errors and false gospel are obvious to anyone who follows Jesus as teacher and listens carefully to Jesus' words. Read very carefully, your eternal salvation depends on it!
ellauri151.html on line 860: [15] For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel.

ellauri151.html on line 899: [11] For this gospel I was appointed a preacher and apostle and teacher,
ellauri151.html on line 981:

24. On remuneration for preaching the gospel:

ellauri155.html on line 519: Advanced education can be helpful, but it is not required to know what God expects of us. This doctrine of perspicuity also recognizes that not everything in Scripture is easy to understand. Some passages are more difficult to interpret than others even if no one can miss the gospel in the pages of the Bible.
ellauri155.html on line 548: Tutustu Jeesuksen lähettämiin gospelartisteihin.

ellauri155.html on line 791: Calvin then addresses the mistaken notion that election removes human responsibility. Many today associate John Calvin with an aberration of his teaching called Hyper-Calvinism, which is a doctrine that emphasizes divine sovereignty to the exclusion of human responsibility. Among other things, Hyper-Calvinism would deny 1) that gospel invitations are to be delivered to all people without exception; 2) that men can be urged to come to Christ; and 3) that God has a universal love. To Calvin these teachings were monstrous distortions of truth. God really loves a lot also those he chucks into the recycle bin. Except Esau, whom he hates. Vitun karvakäsi.
ellauri156.html on line 812: That is precisely what the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ does for us. We were dead in our trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1-3). We were blinded to the immensity of our sins (2 Corinthians 4:4). The coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, His perfect life, His innocent and sacrificial death, His literal and physical resurrection are all historical events. But the gospel is also a story, a true story. When we read the New Testament Gospels, we read a story that is even more dramatic, more amazing, more disturbing than the story Nathan told David. When we see the way unbelieving men treated our Lord, we should be shocked, horrified, and angered. We should cry out, “They deserve to die!” And that they do. But the Gospel is not written only to show us their sins -- those who actually heard Jesus and cried, “Crucify Him, Crucify Him” -- it is written so that the Spirit of God can cry out in our hearts, “Thou art the man! Yo mon!” When we see the way men treated Jesus, we see the way we would treat him, if he were here. We see how we treat him today. With laughter and ridicule. And that, my friend, reveals the immensity of our sin, and the immensity of our need for repentance and forgiveness. Words, words, words. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
ellauri163.html on line 337: Paizi Jooseppihan oli pelkkä aisankannattaja, Jepen isäpuoli. Höh, Marianhan sukupuuta tässä pitäis seurata, sillä oli 50% samat geenit kuin Jee-suxella. Loput oli pyhältä hengeltä (tai Gabrielilta jos Saramagon gospeliin on luottamista). Jonka sukupuu on lyhkönen.
ellauri163.html on line 893: But now comes something rather suspect: There are no gospels which are immortal, but neither is there any reason for believing that humanity is incapable of inventing new ones (1954, pp. 475-476).
ellauri171.html on line 404: They were a sort of protected species, like a court jester in medieval Europe. They could say something critical to the ruler and get away with it, where no-one else could. There were many such men in the Old Testament (Elijah springs to mind), and several in the gospels (Jesus and John were both called prophets).
ellauri171.html on line 409: It was a dangerous thing to do. He might have got away with it with Antipas, who was indolent and indecisive, but Herodias was another matter. She engineered a situation that led to John’s death, silencing him forever. Did Herodias do it alone? Probably not. It is more likely that all three (Antipas, Herodias and Salome) planned the charade beforehand, to provide an excuse for getting rid of John and silencing him. In any case John, already in prison, was quickly beheaded. Another political problem was solved. Were it not for the fact that the gospels recorded this deed, John’s name and the horror of his death would have been lost forever.
ellauri184.html on line 118: The gospel mentions that Mary and Joseph took Jesus out of a labor-intensive hospital on a Sabbath to purify the infant from sickness before the L-d’s meeting, as well as to administer the final purification rituals over His redemption, according to G-d’s Torah .
ellauri184.html on line 239: This may at first blush sound like interesting background material that is not especially helpful for reading and interpreting the gospels. But Mark and Matthew have structured their narratives around a geographical framework dividing the north and the south, culminating in the confrontation of this prophet from Galilee and the religious establishment of Jerusalem.
ellauri184.html on line 346: The town is cited in all four gospels (Matthew 4:13, 8:5, 11:23, 17:24, Mark 1:21, 2:1, 9:33, Luke 4:23, 31,7:1, 10:15, John 2:12, 4:46, 6:17, 24, 59) where it was reported to have been the hometown of the tax collector Matthew (aka Leevi, eri kuin evankelista), and located not far from Bethsaida, the hometown of the apostles Simon Peter, Andrew, James and John. Some readers take Mark 2:1 as evidence that Jesus may have owned a home in the town, but it is more likely that he stayed in the house of one of his followers here. He certainly spent time teaching and healing there. One Sabbath, Jesus taught in the synagogue in Capernaum and healed a man who was possessed by an unclean spirit (Luke 4:31–36 and Mark 1:21–28). This story is notable as the only one that is common to the gospels of Mark and Luke, but not contained in the Gospel of Matthew (see Synoptic Gospels for more literary comparison between the gospels). Afterward, Jesus healed Simon Peter´s mother-in-law of a fever (Luke 4:38–39). According to Luke 7:1–10 and Matthew 8:5, this is also the place where Jesus healed the boyfriend of a Roman centurion who had asked for his help. Capernaum is also the location of the healing of the paralytic lowered by friends through the roof to reach Jesus, as reported in Mark 2:1–12 and Luke 5:17–26.
ellauri184.html on line 348: In Matthew 9:1 the town is referred to only as "his own city", and the narrative in Matthew 9:2–7 does not mention the paralytic being lowered through the roof. Most traditional biblical commentators (e.g. Bengel, Benson and the Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary) assume that in Matthew 9:1–7 "his own city" means Capernaum, because of the details that are common to the three synoptic gospels.
ellauri184.html on line 682: The custom of releasing prisoners in Jerusalem at Passover is known to theologians as the Paschal Pardon, but this custom (whether at Passover or any other time) is not recorded in any historical document other than the gospels, leading some scholars to question its historicity and suspect that such a custom was a mere narrative invention of the Bible´s writers like so much else in the fake good news.
ellauri184.html on line 773: Jose Saramago is an atheist. This should be enough warning for everyone that desires to read the book. It is very explicit and so religion it’s exposed at its weakest and God as a character is revealed. I come from a Roman-Catholic background but I still wanted to read it, ever since the Gnostic gospel where Jesus childhood is revealed and he changes from a mischievous badly behaved kid to the Jesus from the new testament I wanted to see Saramago’s take on it. Saramago is such a master of words that he makes every bit of faith look totally illogical.
ellauri244.html on line 85: Ei tarviis muuta kun haistaa naisen kiima, jos ei vaatteet peittäis. Mun pillu kyllä viestittää kokoajan panetustaan. (2+ palsta) Kirkon tulevaisuusselonteossa yllättää myönteinen suhtautuminen kirkkoon - Siunauksen signaalit koottiin ihmisten arjesta. Urut ja gospel lyövät kättä Lakeuden Ristissä lauantaina - Lasse Heikkilän gospeloratorio syntyi miltei kiimassa. (Kotimaa) Caverion tähtää tuloskunnon parantamiseen keskittymällä kiinteistönhoitoon ja järkeviin projekteihin. Pahin kiima pyrkiä väkisinkin isoihin hankkeisiin on kostautunut järkyttävinä tappioina. Caverion Oyj julkaisi uuden strategian ja uudet taloudelliset tavoitteensa yhtiön pääomamarkkinapäivillä marraskuussa. (Talotekniikka)
ellauri244.html on line 193: Keith Butler exposed! Bishop Butler and his wife live at the moment in a $1.3 million home in Troy, Michigan, for which they paid cash. In fact, over the last couple decades he has owned some 20 properties, almost all of them paid for in cash. They own several homes at the moment. Like other Word of Faith ministers like Robert Tilton, Butler preaches the "prosperity gospel", constantly browbeating their followers to "sow the seed of prosperty" by giving money to the church, which will supposedly be returned to them a hundred fold. They preach that godliness leads to wealth, thus stigmatizing the poor - if you aren't rich, you obviously just don't have enough faith or aren't a good enough Christian. This is pretty much a sure sign that you're dealing with a huckster.
ellauri244.html on line 418: Millenniaaleja Jeesus-covereita on tosi monia, esim. Bernard Malamudin (jumalan armo, 1982), Jose Saramagon (Jeesuxen Kristuxen evankeliumi, 1991) Naahum Mailerin (pojan evankeliumi, 1997), ja Harri Sirolan pahnanpohjimmainen (Jeesus Enkelinpoika Nasaretilainen, 2001). Missään niistä ei Jeesus sikise pyhästä hengestä, vaan asialla on ollut joku kikkelillä varustettu välimies. Eikä missään pidä Jeppe poika kaatioita jalassa, vaan kaikilla se päätyy nussimaan Maria Magdaleenaa tai jotain toista hoitoa. Tää on selvästi jäänyt kynäilijöitä vaivaamaan, niinkuin varmaan gospelien kuulijakunnan enemmistöä. Missä on E ja K, siellä pitää olla F. Kreikkalaisten jumalat oli himo bylsijöitä, siinä suhteessa on tuppikullien partapozo vastine aikamoinen pettymys. Naiset vaietkoot telttamiesten seurakunnassa, ja niiden naimisesta oli viisainta myös setämiesten enimmäxeen vaieta.
ellauri276.html on line 891: Se mitä jenkit saavat aikaan sokeroimalla näitä melko masentuneita luterilaisisia virsiä näkyy seuraavasta gospelcoverista Johanin "Vi prisar dig" biisiin. Sokeroinnin jälkeen ne palaavat sveduihin sokerrikuorrutettuina:
ellauri285.html on line 583: Kouvolassa järjestettiin ensimmäistä kertaa Vappugospel. HY:n kääntäjänkoulutuslaitos täytti 5v.
ellauri334.html on line 267: In the synoptic gospels, which are considered more historically reliable than the very theological gJohn, and especially the first, Mark, Jesus's public ministry is largely focused on his apocalyptic message, with a bit of faith healing and exorcism thrown in for good measure. His remarks about himself, and the notion that he was the messiah, was perhaps something… (more)
ellauri334.html on line 298: And in the gospel of Judas, non canonical of course, are two words you won’t find in the canonical or apocryphal Bibles “Jesus laughed.” I may be alone, but I like to picture Jesus laughing on the cross. And his fellow felon whistling a merry tune. All three hanging singing in unison. I’m sure He needs to from time to time.
ellauri348.html on line 717: D'Aulnoys roman översattes till svenska 1746. Motivet har bland annat behandlats av Anton Kalmeter (1712-1764) i alexandrindikten Saga om prints Adolph, och printsessan Lycksalighet (1747) som är en bearbetning av d'Aulnoys roman. Den svenska varianten av sagan utkom i sina första versioner på 1760- eller 1770-talet. En utgåva hos Axmar i Falun från 1810, Lycksalighetens ö, förestäld uti en wacker historisk berättelse, som wisar deras fåfänglighet, hwilka söka at winna den rätta lycksaligheten här i werlden, samt huru tiden och afunden alt til intet gör, ehuru stort nöje man tycker sig : hafwa ärnådt. är den variant som gav Atterbom uppslaget till hans sagospel Lycksalighetens ö.
ellauri360.html on line 480: It is easy to understand scholars slightly overemphasizing when they claim that the global expansion is actually the Pentecostal expansion. Missionaries are frequently criticized as serving both Christ and commerce. They are pictured as agents of colonial expansion and unable to distinguish between the gospel message and their own cultural preferences. Kenyan Jomo Kenyatta famously captures this critical perspective: “When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said ‘Let us pray.’ We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land.”
ellauri383.html on line 409: For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.
ellauri408.html on line 293: As a matter of fact, Jesus’s first words in the oldest gospel, Mark, and thus Jesus’s first words recorded in the Bible, were a false prophecy:
ellauri408.html on line 295: “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.” (Mark 1:15)
ellauri408.html on line 340: The Bible is full of badly-told fairy tales. For instance, the book of Acts says Jesus flew into the clouds like Superman before a Jerusalem crowd, with angels preaching a sermon and prophesying that he would return “the same way.” But we know that didn’t happen because no other author of the New Testament mentioned the most miraculous thing human eyes ever witnessed. The four gospels and Acts all disagree on what Jesus said and did after the alleged resurrection. But if you were hearing the words of the resurrected God, wouldn’t you be sure to remember and communicate them faithfully? Clearly five different authors made up five different accounts of what happened post-alleged-resurrection because no one knew what really happened after the empty grave was discovered. Acts says Jesus taught the mysteries of the Kingdom of God for 40 days in Jerusalem, but no one bothered to record a single word he said. Can anyone really believe that is possible?
ellauri408.html on line 358: For instance, Herod the Great died in 4 BCE and could not have tried to kill a baby who was born during a census that occurred a decade later, according to the gospel of Matthew.
ellauri408.html on line 418: There is no contemporary evidence outside the Bible that Jesus was a real person, and certainly not a person of any consequence. But there are parts of the gospels that sound like a real person. If I had to guess, I would say that Jesus was an unconventional rabbi who had table fellowship with prostitutes and rogues (a “sin” in the eyes of the hypocritical Pharisees), and went around ministering to the sick and the poor. When he died there may have been an empty grave and some sort of NDE (which are not uncommon) in which he saw something like heaven. That could account for the genesis of the Christian religion. Paul might have communicated with Jesus, or sincerely thought he did, such things are not all that uncommon. But the virgin birth, the massacre of the innocents, walking on water, the transfiguration and ascension, were all obviously made up and added later, since Paul knew nothing about such things and the four gospels and Acts do not agree on such “super miracles.”
ellauri412.html on line 660: How do you know the canonical gospel authors weren’t simply creating fictions about Jesus to make him sound more like the suffering servant of Isaiah 53 than he really was? Of course you will tout the historical reliability of the gospels, but I would provide scholarly resistance to that conclusion every step of the way. The question is not whether YOU can be reasonable to see Jesus as the Isaiah 53 servant but whether skeptics can  reasonably deny this allegation.
ellauri420.html on line 319: But you can stand against this attack, provided you wear the protective armor of Christ Jesus your Lord: his truth, his righteousness, his gospel, his faith, and his salvation. Wield the sword of his Spirit with prayer and supplication, culbutant en prière,  knowing that your Father in heaven delights in hearing your prayer and will most surely deliver you his takeaway in his own time and pay your way from all that ails you. So don’t cash it in. Never ever give up; be just as persistent as the devil in your attacks against those you love.
ellauri447.html on line 287: Tatian of Adiabene, or Tatian the Syrian or Tatian the Assyrian, was an Assyrian Christian writer and theologian of the 2nd century. Tatian's most influential work is the Diatessaron, a Biblical paraphrase, or "harmony", of the four gospels that became the standard text of the four gospels in the Syriac-speaking churches until the 5th-century, after which it gave way to the four separate gospels in the Peshitta version.
ellauri478.html on line 62: Matti on tunnettu erityisesti painotuksestaan Jeesukseen Vanhan testamentin profetioiden täyttymisenä sekä esityksestään Jeesuksesta luvattuna messiaana ja kuninkaana. Se kuulosta aika juutalaiselta. Juupa juu! Kirjoittajalla on juutalaiset juuret, joista hän ammentaa uutta ja vanhaa teologiaa. Joka tapapaukauxessa Matin ilosanoma oli vanhan kirkon pääevankeliumi. Kirjan tunnetuimpia osuuksia on vuorisaarna, joka sisältää Jeesuksen keskeisimmät moraaliopetukset. Siitä kaikki on Jeesuxen keikoista eniten pitäneet. "En minä ole tullut kumoamaan, vaan toteuttamaan (lain)”. Semiitixi Matti oli aika antisemitistinen. Valitettavasti nykytutkimus on osoittanut Markun voittosanoman vanhemmaksi höh, Markkuhan oli se nakupelle pikkupoika Gezemanessa. No ei senkään iloviesti välttämättä vuotanut sen der Kullista. Näissä hommissa on niin paljon kusetusta että on pakko mennä ihan uskon varassa. The gospels are the product of the second generation of the Christian movement.
ellauri478.html on line 115:

This question leads to many other theological questions about the nature of hell, the problem of evil, and the salvation of people such as babies, the paperless immigrants, the intellectually disabled, and others who cannot understand the propositions of the gospel (e.g. Trinity). There is quite a bit I don’t know about this topic. But I do know God is loving, compassionate, and just. And I truly trust him to judge rightly, I'm sure I shall applaud his decision from my place among the lambs whatever it is. What he wills is good and conversely.
ellauri480.html on line 124: Leviticus 27 finishes the book with laws regarding vows. God indicated the value of people, animals, land, and possessions in the event that “anyone makes a special vow to the Lord involving the valuation of persons” (Leviticus 27:2). How does this connect with the rest of the book, and where do we see the gospel in the idea of valuation?
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 729: Mitäs pahaa Katy on sille tehnyt? Ai jaha, Katy-täti (25) sanoi Bota (18) sakkolihaxi jossain aikaisessa shoussa kun se oli kuitenkin jo täysi-ikäinen! Thank god you're at least 18! Katy setäili! Tää muistetaan. Kuuntelin Katyn karjuntaa, se on nähtävästi naapurin tyttö Santa Barbarasta (missä me surfattiin Snoopyllä 1977 nuorina laihoina ja ruskeina). Sillä on lapsekkaita lauluja, Roarissa se on just päässyt jonkun petkuttavan mulkun pauloista ja Teenage dreamissä se kuulostaa Nabokovin polluutiounelta. Mitähän Bo on tässä miettinyt? Ja se taitaa laskea Courtney Loven syyxi pikkuruisen Kurt Cobainin seppukun. No Nirvana oli aika paska bändi mun mielestä, ja eiköhän Kurre ollut izekin aika lailla konin koukussa. Katy koitti ensin laulaa gospelia oikealla nimellään Katy Hudson, mutta se naula ei jostain syystä vetänyt.
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 133: The gospel of Matthew is the only one to tell us Mary was pregnant before she and Joseph had sex. She was said to be “with child from the Holy Spirit”. In proof of this, Matthew quoted a prophecy from the Old Testament that a “virgin will conceive and bear a son and he will be called Emmanuel”.
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 658: "but the wicked, who know not God, and obey not the gospel of Jesus Christ, shall be cast into eternal torments, and punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power." (Chapter XXXIII, Of the Last Judgment)
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 662: Another area of debate is the fate of the unevangelized (i.e., those who have never had an opportunity to hear the Christian gospel), those who die in infancy, and the mentally disabled. According to ACUTE some Protestants agree with Augustine that people in these categories will be damned to hell for original sin, while others believe that God will make an exception in these cases, rather like the Australian government should have done with the antivac tennis playing serb.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 638: Which one is true? We simply do not know for sure. The facts about his death have not been historically proven, beyond a reasonable doubt. In fact, there is no historical consensus on the person of Matthew. There are several conflicting accounts, and the Greek text does not state anywhere he was an eyewitness (and therefore a disciple). Maybe he was a fake. The problem is the gospel of Matthew is anonymous: the author is not named within the oldest surviving text, and the superscription "according to Matthew" was added some time in the second century, although the gospel doesn't state it's an eyewitness account. The historically very likely incorrect tradition that the author was the disciple Matthew begins with the early Christian bishop Papias of Hierapolis.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 749: The source material for the account of Jesus creating birds out of clay is likely derived from the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, a late second or third century pseudepigraphal gospel that describes Jesus’ early life before he started his ministry as an adult. The story reads:
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 755: While the Quran mentions the miracle in passing whereas the infancy gospel narrates the episode, the apparent similarity cannot be denied. The source material for this account poses special problems for Muslim source critics because of the nature of the infancy account.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 758: Christian literature. Such legends developed in the early centuries of the Christian movement and were constantly elaborated and expanded upon from late antiquity through the Middle Ages for purposes of edification and instruction. Never mind they were lies, it's okay in fairy tales and fiction. The infancy gospel and other books like it (Protevangelium of James) were written to satisfy the imaginations and creativity of latter Christians who sought to expound upon what the nativity narratives willfully leave out.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 763: dangerous powers, rather like Harry Potter. His words can have harsh consequences when he is angered or insulted, as when he shrivels up one boy for a quite insignificant act and strikes another dead for merely bumping into him. It is hard not to feel distaste at such stories, which seem so far removed from the Jesus of the canonical gospels, and one can even detect a degree of unease on the part of the author as he narrates them: while attempting to absolve Jesus from the blame, he more than once records the great offense which Jesus’ behavior caused, as well as the efforts of his parents to restrain him, as when Joseph asks Jesus: “Why do you do such things that these people must suffer and hate us and persecute us?” On another occasion Joseph tells Mary: “Do not let him go outside the door, for all those who provoke him die."
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 765: The Christ-child is presented as one that does not grow in wisdom and understanding but yields his sharp omnipotence at a whim on unsuspecting people and his parents. Though widely influential in Christian imagination and art, the infancy gospels were never close to canonization. They were not discussed or considered because they were known to be fictitious fables. F.F. Bruce discussing the nature of the infancy gospels remarked that
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 767: “the embellishments with which the ‘infancy gospels’ fill out the sparse details of the birth stories in Matthew and Luke are all fabricated out of whole cloth, they are not traditions of more or less dimly remembered facts; but they generated tenacious traditions of a new kind.”
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 769: The text was viewed as unhistorical, spurious, and useful only as a vehicle of Christian curiosity. To further add to the case of why it was never remotely considered within the canon, the orthodox Christian writers of the late second century associated the infancy gospel with circles that they considered heretical, particularly with groups of Gnostic Christians. No scholar would dream of taking
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 770: seriously the infancy gospels as valid, historical sources.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 772: The infancy stories do not bear resemblance to the Jesus of the gospels and were never thought to even be remotely historical. Rather, they existed much like Christian fiction does today, to create enjoyment in speculative discourse that is full of biblical metaphor, idioms, and themes.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 802: Muslim apologists would then be making the claim that “Christians made a mistake by not seeing the text’s truthfulness and historical validity.” The problem with this objection is triune: a) the criteria for canonicity, b) the history of the books, and c) the theology of the gospel itself.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 806: b) Furthermore, this objection ignores the history behind the Infancy Gospels themselves and the intentions behind their creation. The Christians penning the gospels knew they were creating stories that were not meant to be read as truth or contain actual, correct historiography. How do we know? Because of 1)-5). And above all, because 6) OUR God said so (to the patriarchs (p.c.), and they should know).
xxx/ellauri201.html on line 109: hymn sung after the epistle and before the gospel in a Protestant mass.
xxx/ellauri252.html on line 262: Sirri Härölän jouzenlaulu oli teos Jeesus Enkelinpoika Nasaretilainen, aika samantyyppinen kirja kuin aikaisemmin lukemamme evankeliumi-fanifiktio. Jännä miten samanlaisia EFK-versioita kynäilijät on Jeesuxesta kehitelleet. Selkeästi panokohtauxet on ollut suurin puute evankeliumeissa. Harri vetää gospelien mutkat suorixi, samastaa Magdalan ja Betanian Maariat. Jeesus tekee Magdaleenan kanssa perettä kuin sen yhden bestselleristin tiiliskivessä, annas olla se on kielen päällä, juu Dan Brownin Leonardo da Vinci koodi. There, Teabing explains that the Grail is not a cup, but connected to Mary Magdalene, and that she was Jesus Christ's wife and is the person to his right in The Last Supper. The hidden sarcophagus of Maria M. is in Louvre. No meat left in it, I fear.
xxx/ellauri376.html on line 118: Tässä suhteessa Little Richard sanoi Presleystä: "Hän oli influensseri. Elvis oli siunaus. He eivät päästäneet mustaa musiikkia läpi. Hän avasi oven mustalle musiikille." Al Green oli samaa mieltä: "Hän mursi jään meidän mustien puolesta." Kun hänen tyttöystävänsä kuoli itsemurhalla, Al Greenistä tuli vihitty pastori ja hän siirtyi gospel-musiikkiin. Myöhemmin hän palasi maallisen musiikin pariin.
xxx/ellauri376.html on line 129: Greenin entinen sihteeri Linda Wills nosti 25 000 dollarin siviilikanteen häntä vastaan vuonna 1974. Wills syytti Greenin hakkaamisesta ja työntämisestä lasioven läpi Memphisin toimistossaan sen jälkeen, kun Linda oli oikeutettu saamaan palkkaa tehtävistään.Vuonna 1978 Green sai syytteen päällekäynnistä ja pahoinpitelystä, koska hänen väitettiin hakkaamasta Lovie Smithiä tajuttomaksi puun oksalla. Alin studio albumit ovat yxin tein lukien alla. Nähtävästi 80-luku meni gospelina, sitten jatkui naisten mätkintä.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1123: I could spent lots of times demonstrating the false gospel of the LDS, and the false prophecies which were made by your false prophets, but I've done all that on my blog (here).
xxx/ellauri427.html on line 144: Sanan- ja uskonnonvapauden tila Suomessa on heikentynyt, mikä näkyy esimerkiksi kristillisten viittausten karsimisena kouluista. – Ajatellaan, että on parempi, ettei ole sitten mitään. Mutta se vie meiltä enemmistön oikeuden. Mitä sananvapautta sellainen on? gospelmuusikko Pekka Simojoki kysyy. Gospelmuusikolta pitäisi ruuvata kikkeli irti kuten sen Nazi esi-isiltä.
xxx/ellauri440.html on line 204: Kirsi pakotti rangaistuxexi Pezkun kazomaan töllöstä Jesus Christ Superstaria. Tästä on pitkä paasaus jo albumissa 149. Cruel and unusual punishment. Jesus Christ Superstar on Andrew Lloyd Webberin säveltämä ja Tim Ricen sanoittama rockooppera. Se kuvaa Jeesuksen ja Juudas Iskariotin keskinäistä suhdetta ja Jeesuksen elämän viimeistä viikkoa ja päättyy ristiinnaulitsemiseen. Ensimmäiseksi rockooppera julkaistiin albumina vuonna 1970. Levyllä Jeesuksen sijasta lauloi Ian Gillan ja Juudaksen Murray Head. Ensimmäinen lavaesitys sai ensi-iltansa 1971, ja Norman Jewisonin ohjaama elokuvaversio julkaistiin 1973. Jesus Christ Superstar is a product of its era, fused with 1970's rock, gospel, folk, and funk as well as modern colloquialisms and energetic choreography. The themes that appear throughout Superstar are fame, revolution, radicalism, and humility. Maria Magdalena antautuu hyvin voideltuna Jeesuxelle ja Jeesus Jumalalle. Beatlesit olivat suurempi hitti kun Jeesus, muttei yhtä kauan. Rangaistus ei ole tehonnut, onnettomalla Imillä jatkuu päihdeongelma. Amis ei nappaa, Kirsi alkaa väsyä. Pezku puuhaa autistisesti sieniensä parissa. Päihdeongelmainen Arvo Jännevirralta kävi joskus kerjäämässä Merikadulla.
xxx/ellauri440.html on line 217: The gospels present Jesus as someone who, when he met someone physically ill or disabled, would ask them what they wanted, and heal them if that was what they requested (if they were too mentally ill to be capable of answering the question, that was another matter). But this is a minor grumble, and doesn’t stop it being an excellent film. Is 'The Life of Brian' still seen as blasphemous, or just a light-hearted parody? With the delights of Pontius Pilate having Rhotacism and his fwiend Biggus Dickus who according to Pilate "commands a cwack wegion" and "wanks as high as any in Wome" whilst Biggus Dickus with his lisp was even funnier.
xxx/ellauri440.html on line 228: Why did Judas betray Jesus? The only motive shown in scripture is greed, but the gospels also say that Judas was possessed by Satan, and had to act as he did to fulfil prophecies. Judas was a disillusioned disciple betraying Jesus not so much because he loved money, but because he loved his country and thought Jesus had failed it. Why Jesus didn't forgive Judas? Although Judas regrets his betrayal, his subsequent actions suggest he believed his sin was too great for God to forgive, so he didn't ask for forgiveness. If he had trusted that God's mercy is greater than even his sin and repented, he would have been forgiven.
79