Backstory. No-one except the author is really interested in your character's backstory. The reader wants to see what is happening now. Speak for yourself, dear "reader"! Whatever backstory is really necessary can be woven into the main story. Fuck you, damn tunnel visionary. This type of fundamentalistic rules get bent from wire to cater to the nonexisting taste of hoi polloi.
ellauri143.html on line 114: Of the 1,330 couplets in the text, 40 couplets relate to god, rain, calisthenics, and virtue; 340 on fundamental everyday virtues of an individual; 250 on royalty; 100 on ministers of state; 220 on essential requirements of administration; 130 on social morality, both positive and negative; and 250 on human love, fucking and passion. Just goes to show.
ellauri145.html on line 524: Following the war, academics who had supported the Nazi regime were banned from teaching, including Heidegger, who never spoke publicly or privately about his involvement. Heidegger turned away from his earlier project of creating a fundamental ontology, and in doing so he also turned away from Nietzsche - or so his writings would make it appear. In truth, he remained just as indebted to Nietzsche’s work as he ever was, only he shifted focus. He created a false presentation of Nietzsche’s work in order to distance himself from his own past and involvement with the Nazis. Many academics take Heidegger’s critique of Nietzsche to be factual and seem to excuse Heidegger because he was under the influence of Nietzsche.
ellauri151.html on line 653: Luther puts this clearly: “The spirit consists in the use, not the object”. Luther reached his theological breakthrough when he realized that theological language consists fundamentally of speech acts and linguistic action. Augustinuxen show-and-tell semantiikka ei kata mysteerien pragmatiikkaa: ei kuivassa näkkärissä ole sielua, vaan se pujahtaa siihen joteskin kun näkki pannaan kielelle ja sanotaan oikeat taikasanat. Hizi empä arvannut poikasena kielitieteen kurssilla miten läheltä Luther siinä liippasi, hyvä ettei tukka heilahtanut.
ellauri155.html on line 227: Nykysuomi.com sivusto on persufundamentalistien groomingsivusto, jossa persut koittavat uskotella izelleen olevansa jotain yhtä hyviä tai jopa parempia kuin rikkaammat ja sivistyneemmät läntiset ja eteläiset naapurinsa. Aika säälittävää. Esim että saagoista selviää kaihnuulaisten vallanneen Norri-kuninkaansa johdolla koko muinais--Norjan lyhkäsillä 30cm väkipuukoilla. Satakuntalaiset oli ehkä mukana. Sana kuningas on suomalaista alkuperää, ei se sunkaan ole tekemisisssä skandinaavien kunna-verbin kanssa, vaikka kuningas alunperinkin olikin joku kuuluttaja. Se ettei näistä asioista opetettu koulussa, on vaan salaliittoa, ei haluta että perussuomalaiset olisivat ylpeitä uljaasta sotaisasta menneisyydestään. Kohta on jo liian myöhäistä, kun karvakädet oppii norjaa sekä suomea eikä kohta enää muista mistä ne on alunperin peräisin.
ellauri155.html on line 886: Santayana ei tykännyt olla professori, se oli ajautunut siihen. Se lopettikin professorin hommat 48-vuotiaana tykkänään ja lähti seikkailemaan. Varmaan homostelukin oli silleen helpompaa. In later life, Santayana was financially comfortable, in part because his 1935 novel, The Last Puritan, had become an unexpected best-seller. In turn, he financially assisted a number of writers, including Bertrand Russell, with whom he was in fundamental disagreement, philosophically and politically. Santayana´s only novel, The Last Puritan, ist ein bildungsroman, centering on the personal growth of its protagonist, Oliver Alden. His Persons and Places is an autobiography. These works also contain many of his sharper opinions and bons mots. He wrote books and essays on a wide range of subjects, including philosophy of a less technical sort, literary criticism, the history of ideas, politics, human nature, morals, the influence of religion on culture and social psychology, all with considerable wit and humor.
ellauri159.html on line 772: To the description of the ideal perimeter-keeper outlined above, Donovan assigns four “tactical virtues”: strength, courage, mastery, and honor. These are “simple, amoral, and functional virtues” — “the practical virtues of men who must rely on one another in a worst case scenario.” They are “amoral” because they are crucial to the success of any gang — no matter if what they’re fighting for is right or wrong. Strength, courage, mastery, and honor are the attributes needed in a team of Navy SEALs just as much as a family of Mafioso. If you’ve ever wondered why we are fascinated by gangsters, pirates, bank robbers, and outlaws of all stripes, and can’t help but think of them as pretty manly despite their thuggery and extralegal activities, now you know; they’re not good men, but they’ve mastered the core fundamentals of being good at being men. So they are good men, though they are bad men. I mean.
ellauri159.html on line 778: Courage: The spirit /will/discipline to engage and employ one’s strength when inwardly tempted to shrink/run/hide. There are “higher” forms of courage, but at its most fundamental, it represents an outwardly demonstrated indifference to risk, pain, and physical danger.
ellauri159.html on line 791: Even the men we hold up as proof that you can be manly by living the higher virtues without completely fulfilling the 3 P’s of Manhood (or even 3 pushups) ultimately derive their inspiration from the fundamental underpinnings of the tactical virtues. Figures like Gandhi and Jesus are lauded for their non-violence and their goodness, but our ability to think of them as manly, derives from their embrace of masculine expendability – a courageous indifference to the pain and suffering others might inflict on their physical body. They were good men, certainly, but their willingness to sacrifice themselves for the sake of their people, also made them good at being men. Gandhi did procreate a lot. Jesus provided for millions of preachers. Both were expendable. That´ll do, welcome to the perimeter pencil necks.
ellauri161.html on line 584: A lady critic: His approach to comedy and my ability to enjoy his work as a director began to diverge when he had a sequence about bailouts and crony capitalism tacked on to another otherwise funny film. That was tasteless. The problem was McKay seemed to find entertainment and real-world issues to be fundamentally separate, deploying one in hopes of getting eyes on the other. While all we droopy lips know that they are part of one and the same entertainment scene!
ellauri163.html on line 501: Jos sinulla on aikeissa puhua uskontosi vietäväksi älyllisesti rehellinen ateisti, niin aloita nyt hyvä pelle siitä, että tunnet sen tuotteesi mihin yrität puhua mukaan. Ja ei, sinun ei pidä lukea toisille raamattua. Lue se alkuun ihan itsellesi. ...ja sitten se totuus lopuksi: Keskiverto ateisti tuntee raamatun monin verroin paremmin kuin yksikään fundamentalistinen lahkohihhuli.
ellauri164.html on line 232: A pupil of William "Will to Believe" James, whose Essays in Radical Empiricism he edited (1912), Perry became one of the leaders of the New Realism movement. Perry argued for a naturalistic theory of value and a New Realist theory of perception and knowledge. He wrote a celebrated biography of William James, which won the 1936 Pulitzer Prize for Biography or Autobiography, and proceeded to a revision of his critical approach to natural knowledge. An active member among a group of American New Realist philosophers, he elaborated around 1910 the program of new realism. However, he soon dissented from moral and spiritual ontology, and turned to a philosophy of disillusionment. Perry was an advocate of a militant democracy: in his words "total but not totalitarian". Puritanism and Democracy (1944) is a famous wartime attempt to reconcile two fundamental concepts in the origins of modern America. Durkheim oli taas aivan oikeassa: sodan aikana vedetään moraalin korsetinnauhat kireälle.
ellauri184.html on line 72: Bodily urges are fundamental to Mailer's approach to novels and short works. According to his obituary in The Independent, his "relentless machismo seemed out of place in a man who was actually quite small – though perhaps that was where the aggression originated." For Mailer, African-American men reflected a challenge to his own notions of masculinity. His pecker was not much bigger than those of Hemingway and Scott Fitzgerald, about the size of his pen knife. Like many men with a tiny penis he sought comfort with men and women equally. Throughout his work and personal communications, Nuchem repeatedly expresses interest in, includes episodes of or makes references to, bisexuality or homosexuality.
ellauri189.html on line 129: landscape. Communing with the monotonous plain that extends as far as the horizon, where it melts into the heaven, the author discovers that “mood” (Heidegger’s Gestimmtsein) is the fundamental human mode of being-in-the-world. The level plain and the hemisphere (earth and heaven) constitute a spatial totality that is self-enclosed: Being combines flatness with the curve of the hemisphere, the linear with the cyclical perspective (from an empirical point of view only half of its orbit is visible to man though he can of course turn around to see the rest of it):
ellauri191.html on line 700: "for the artistic power and truth with which he has depicted human conflict as well as some fundamental aspects of contemporary life in his novel cycle Les Thibault"
ellauri196.html on line 622: Its fundamentally conservative "pure and simple" approach limited the AFL to matters pertaining to working conditions and rates of pay, relegating political goals to its allies in the political sphere. The Federation favored pursuit of workers' immediate demands rather than challenging the property rights of owners, and took a pragmatic view of politics which favored tactical support for particular politicians over formation of a party devoted to workers' interests. The AFL's leadership believed the expansion of the capitalist system was seen as the path to betterment of labor, an orientation making it possible for the AFL to present itself as what one historian has called "the conservative alternative to working class radicalism."
ellauri198.html on line 298: Nearly every aspect of the ritual abuse is controversial, including its definition, the source of the allegations and proof thereof, testimonies of alleged victims, and court cases involving the allegations and criminal investigations. The panic affected lawyers, therapists, and social workers who handled allegations of child sexual abuse. Allegations initially brought together widely dissimilar groups, including religious fundamentalists, police investigators, child advocates, therapists, and clients in psychotherapy. The term satanic abuse was more common early on; this later became satanic ritual abuse and further secularized into simply ritual abuse. Over time, the accusations became more closely associated with dissociative identity disorder (then called multiple personality disorder) and anti-government conspiracy theories.
ellauri210.html on line 833: Tristan Tzara captured the inspired lunacy in his 1921 Dada Manifesto on Lukewarm Love. Marcel Duchamp’s “Readymades,” or Francis Picabia’s canvases of human figures as functionless machines belong here. Dada began as a limited franchise, with key outposts in Zurich, Berlin, Paris, and New York. Preceding the Surrealist movement by several years, and often inspired by the Communist Party (though not tied to it), its origins lay in a militant nostalgia for a pre-war lost Eden. Dadaists sought “an art based on fundamentals to cure the madness of the age and a new order of things that would restore the balance between heaven and hell." (Jean Arp).
ellauri210.html on line 1318: In the remaining quarter of the text, André distances himself from her corporeal form and descends into a meandering rumination on her absence, so much so that one wonders if her absence offers him greater inspiration than does her presence. It is, after all, the reification and materialization of Nadja as an ordinary person that André ultimately despises and cannot tolerate to the point of inducing tears. There is something about the closeness once felt between the narrator and Nadja that indicated a depth beyond the limits of conscious rationality, waking logic, and sane operations of the everyday. There is something essentially “mysterious, improbable, unique, bewildering” about her; this reinforces the notion that their propinquity serves only to remind André of Nadja's impenetrability. Her eventual recession into absence is the fundamental concern of this text, an absence that permits Nadja to live freely in André's conscious and unconscious, seemingly unbridled, maintaining her paradoxical role as both present and absent. With Nadja's past fixed within his own memory and consciousness, the narrator is awakened to the impenetrability of reality and perceives a particularly ghostly residue peeking from under its thin veil. Thus, he might better put into practice his theory of Surrealism, predicated on the dreaminess of the experience of reality within reality itself. Nadja Nadja soromnoo.
ellauri219.html on line 599: Pope Benedict’s basic answer is that, although modern principles of political freedom, democracy, equality, and reasonable argument are to be affirmed, a free state rests on “pre-political moral foundations,” which serve as normative points of reference for every regime and must be held in common by all religions and secular world-views. This answer reflects the fact that Pope Benedict disagrees with Rawls on at least two fundamental issues, which constitute the core of the debate between them and to which I shall refer regularly in the course of my analysis. In the first place, Pope Benedict does not share Rawls’s trust in fundamental human reasonableness as a guarantee for political fairness. For Rawls, persons are reasonable when they are ready to propose principles and standards as fair terms of cooperation and to abide by them willingly, given the assurance that others will likewise do so. Those norms they view as reasonable for everyone to accept and therefore as justifiable to them; and they are ready to discuss the fair terms that others propose.
ellauri219.html on line 975: Underworld (also released as Paying the Penalty) is a 1927 American silent crime film directed by Josef von Sternberg and starring Clive Brook, Evelyn Brent and George Bankrupt. The film launched Sternberg's eight-year collaboration with Paramount Pictures, with whom he would produce his seven films with actress Marlene Dietrich. Journalist and screenwriter Ben Hecht won an Academy Award for Best Original Story. Time felt the film was realistic in some parts, but disliked the Hollywood cliché of turning an evil character's heart to gold at the end. Filmmaker and surrealist Luis Buñuel named Underworld as his all time favorite film. Critic Andrew Sarris cautions that Underworld does not qualify as "the first gangster film" as Sternberg "showed little interest in the purely gangsterish aspects of the genre" nor the "mechanics of mob power." Film critic Dave Kehr, on the other hand, writing for the Chicago Reader in 2014, rates Underworld as one of the great gangster films of the silent era. "The film established the fundamental elements of the gangster movie: a hoodlum hero; ominous, night-shrouded city streets; floozies; and a blazing finale in which the cops cut down the protagonist."
ellauri222.html on line 763: This grooming of the self paradoxically requires looking out for number 1. Nowhere is this fact more vividly portrayed than in Henderson the Rain King. Driven in the beginning by a relentless inner voice that repeats, "I want! I want!," Henderson's egoistic absorption in his material success ironically alienates him from himself. Hitching his family to seek fundamental truths in the wilderness of Africa, he discovers the arse loving relationship that men need with nature and with each other and symbolically surrenders his self by accepting responsibility for a lion cub and an orphan child.
ellauri245.html on line 309: Hva er det, hvor ligger det, det som gjør et menneske til mørder? Kenties tälläset meklarien kynäilemät opuxet. Nasjonell galskap, justiinsa se. Personlig mener jeg att drapsevnen er fundamental hos ethvert friskt menneske.
ellauri260.html on line 335: This profound confusion shows that our human manner of life is not the whole of reality, but a special category of it in a special condition. It must be related to something larger, and only in virtue of this can it possess any meaning and derive the necessary power. Religion adopts this way. It leads beyond a special province to a new stage of life ; a stage that transcends these contradictions and opens out new contents and new forces. Hence the whole of reality which is accessible to men falls into three stages : a fundamental stage, a stage of conflict, and a stage of victorious spirituality. It is this last which alone furnishes human life with its indispensable support and an indisputable goal.
ellauri263.html on line 797: dsWith a fundamental understanding of compersion, I´m able to look at moments where I could be jealous in my current monogamous relationship and instead respond in a more levelheaded or even joyful way. It doesn´t bother me if my partner tells me he finds another person attractive, nor am I freaked out if I find myself fucking with a charming stranger on the subway. We might not be entertaining other relationships at the moment, but my partner and I can at best find it cute and at worst feel totally neutral about it when these brief interactions with other parties occur.
ellauri264.html on line 442: From an early age, Pattis says he has felt a burning desire to know God personally. To that end, he spent time in Switzerland at the compound of an American Christian fundamentalist thinker named Francis Schaeffer and then inveigled himself in the graduate philosophy program of Columbia University, where he studied and taught for six years. At one point, he nearly joined the CIA, but that opportunity fizzled when the agency didn’t like his polygraph answers about homosexual experiences. “I said, ‘Well, I haven’t had any yet. I don’t know how I’m going to respond if you ask,’ ” he recalls. “I think they decided that was a little too much for them.”
ellauri270.html on line 415: Jackson examines the basics of human nature in “The Lottery,” asking whether or not all humans are capable of violence and cruelty, and exploring how those natural inclinations can be masked, directed, or emphasized by the structure of society. Philosophers throughout the ages have similarly questioned the basic structure of human character: are humans fundamentally good or evil? Without rules and laws, how would we behave towards one another? Are we similar to animals in….. read analysis of Human Nature.
ellauri285.html on line 291: Meille objektiivisille naturisteille, karkeasti, elämä on merkizevää jos harrastamme objektiivisia arvoja: totta, hyvää ja kaunista. 7 hyvää ja 8 kaunista, tarkemmin sanoen. Ei vaan 4, nimittäin Merkityxen konsekventialismi, ristiriitainen näkemys, teleologinen näkemys, ja fundamentalismi.
ellauri285.html on line 757: Later, but of more critical importance, the Fredrickson and Losada work on modeling the positivity ratio aroused the skepticism of Nick Brown, a graduate student in applied positive psychology, who questioned whether such work could reliably make such broad claims, and perceived that the paper´s mathematical claims underlying the critical positivity ratio were suspect. Brown contacted and ultimately collaborated with physics and maths professor Alan Sokal and psychology professor Harris Friedman on a re-analysis of the paper´s data (hereafter the Brown-Sokal-Friedman rebuttal). They argued that Losada´s earlier work on positive psychology and Fredrickson and Losada´s 2005 critical positivity ratio paper contained "numerous fundamental conceptual and mathematical errors", errors of a magnitude that completely invalidated their claims.
ellauri285.html on line 759: Fredrickson wrote a response in which she conceded that the mathematical aspects of the critical positivity ratio were "questionable" and that she had "neither the expertise nor the insight" to defend them, but she maintained that the empirical evidence for the existence of a critical positivity ratio was solid. Brown, Sokal, and Friedman, the rebuttal authors, published their response to Fredrickson´s "Update" the next year, maintaining that there was no evidence for a critical positivity ratio. Losada declined to respond to the criticism (indicating to the Chronicle of Higher Education that he was too busy running his consulting business).[verification needed] Hämäläinen and colleagues responded later, passing over the Brown-Sokal-Friedman rebuttal claim of failed criteria for use of differential equations in modeling, instead arguing that there were no fundamental errors in the mathematics itself, only problems related to the model´s justification and interpretation.
ellauri294.html on line 699: Varhainen uskonnollinen ilmaisu Chautauquassa oli yleensä yleisluonteista, verrattavissa myöhempään Moral Re-Armament -liikkeeseen. 1900-luvun ensimmäisellä puoliskolla fundamentalismista pidettiin yhä enemmän Chautauquan saarnoja ja luentoja. Mutta Chautauquajen suuri määrä sekä keskusvallan puuttuminen tarkoitti sitä, että uskonnolliset mallit vaihtelivat suuresti heidän välillään. Jotkut olivat niin uskonnollisesti suuntautuneita, että ne olivat lähinnä kirkon leirejä, kun taas maallisempi Chautauquas muistutti kesäkoulua ja kilpaili vaudevillen kanssa teattereissa ja sirkustelttaesityksessä eläinnäytteillään ja trapetsillaan akrobaatit.
ellauri301.html on line 377: Muukalaisvastaiset fundamentalistit tappavat Algeriassa neljä nunnaa sekä viidennen naisen, nunnien luona sattumalta yöpyneen ruotsalaisen. Skånesta löydetään mies seivästettynä. Seuraavaksi metsästä löytyy kuristettu mies puuhun sidottuna, seitten säkissä hukutettu mies. Kurt Wallender ja muut Ystadin poliisit ovat ihmeissään. Mitä kertovat kummalliset murhatavat? Jotain ne Henningistä kertovat, mutta mitä? Miten murhaaja saadaan pysäytettyä? Sas se. Juhannus 1996. Kolme elämäniloista nuorta lahkolaista sekä onnellinen
ellauri309.html on line 511: Vuonna 1936 Graham jätti isänsä maitotilan ja lähti opiskelemaan Bob Jonesin Collegeen, joka sijaitsi tuolloin Tennesseen Clevelandissa. Opinnot Bob Jonesin Collegessa jäivät kuitenkin yhden lukukauden mittaiseksi oppilaitoksen äärimmäisen fundamentalismin vuoksi. Graham siirtyi opiskelemaan Floridan raamattuinstituuttiin Tampan läheisyyteen. Graham valmistui vuonna 1940 ja hänet asetettiin Eteläisen baptistikonvention pastorin tehtävään. Graham ilmoittautui jatkokoulutukseen Illinoisissa sijaitsevaan Wheaton Collegeen ja tapasi Wheatonissa tulevan vaimonsa, Ruth Bellin. She had been conceived in China in missionary position, unlike a horse. Graham talked his future wife, Ruth, into abandoning her ambition to evangelize in Tibet in favor of staying in the United States to marry him – and that to do otherwise would be "to thwart God's obvious will". After Ruth agreed to marry him, Graham cited the Bible for claiming authority over her, saying, "then I'll do the leading and you do the following".
ellauri309.html on line 515: Hoover and Sullivan considered King “the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation”. Armed with salacious archival material from a recent FBI documents release, Garrow has reported about the iconic civil rights leader’s sexual misconduct, ranging from numerous extramarital affairs and solicitation of prostitutes to the allegation that he was present during the violent rape of a Maryland churchgoer. Garrow insists that a fundamental reconsideration of King's reputation is imminent. He describes how King and a handful of Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) officials checked into Washington DC’s Willard hotel along with “several women ‘parishioners’”. The group met in his room and discussed which women among the parishioners would be suitable for natural and unnatural sex acts, meaning anal and oral, genital being natural. The alleged rapist was Reverend Logan Kearse, a Baptist minister from Baltimore. Reportedly, "Mike" King just stood by with erect cock in hand overseeing the action, like another Kim Yung Il.
ellauri309.html on line 566: Jabezin rukouksesta tuli erittäin suosittu fundamentalistisen
ellauri313.html on line 173: That being said, at 500 pages, the book takes on a lot and doesn't adequately address it all. There's the nominal plot, which concerns the Yugoslav mafia in Sweden; but there's also a new relationship for Annika, which is complicated; the politics of the newspaper she works for; fundamental questions about the role of the welfare state; and questions about the role of a newspaper vis a vis law enforcement. This all kind of dropped off toward the end of the book, and I didn't find the conclusion to be particularly satisfying. I felt impatient with Annika's (main character), histrionics and irrationality.
ellauri332.html on line 595: Elokuvan ennakkonäytöksen jälkeen asianajajat ilmoittivat, etteivät he ize jatkaisi tällaista toimintaa. Elokuvan Britannian ensi-illassa Stone syytti "moraalissa raivoavaa fundamentalismia " elokuvan USA:n lipputulojen epäonnistumisesta. Hän väitti, että amerikkalaiset kriitikot ja yleisö olivat puhaltaneet Alexanderin seksuaalielimen suhteettomaksi.
ellauri341.html on line 314: Jotakin tekisi mieli sanoa sarjoista Crashing Eid ja Mo. Molemmissa on muslimit esitetty myönteisessä valossa. Eidin saudit ja pakit olivat kauniita ja kilttejä, lukuunottamatta Lamarin fundamentalisti fazia ja famua. Famusta ja Monasta tuli mieleen Riitta ja Seija, tässä järjestyxessä. Kilttejä muslimimiehiä ja huippusuloisia naisia. Ei räyhätty, ei rähätetty eikä oltu liian sentimentaalisia. Way to go musulmaanit!
ellauri351.html on line 95: Laaja ystävyys saksalaisista kristityistä fundamentalistisiin muslimeihin.
ellauri359.html on line 148: Blake haudattiin joukkohautaan toisinajattelijoiden hautausmaalle Bunhill Fieldsissä. Hänen kuoltuaan pitkäaikainen tuttava Frederick Tatham otti Blaken teokset haltuunsa ja jatkoi niiden myyntiä. Myöhemmin Tatham liittyi fundamentalistiseen irvingiläiseen kirkkoon ja poltti tämän kirkon konservatiivisten jäsenten vaikutuksen alaisena harhaoppisina pitämiään käsikirjoituksia. Tuhottujen käsikirjoitusten tarkkaa määrää ei tiedetä, mutta vähän ennen kuolemaansa Blake kertoi ystävälleen kirjoittaneensa "kaksikymmentä tragediaa yhtä pitkiä kuin Macbeth ", joista yksikään ei ole säilynyt. Toinen tuttava, William Michael Rossetti, poltti myös Blaken teoksia, jotka hänen mielestään olivat puutteellisia, ja John Linnell kumitti seksuaaliset kuvat useista Blaken piirustuksista.
ellauri368.html on line 155: Kohta lakko-oikeuskin saadaan poistetuxi. Kenties sitä lyytä lähtevät myös aborttioikeus ja naisten äänioikeus. Turha sitten on naisten enää vikistä kun isokukko Uljas puskee torven perille ei-toivottuja lapsia. Tykinruokaa tarvitaan kipeästi ettei muut fundamentalistit kiri joholle. Helkkari mitä ääliöitä! Termiitteinä kiivetään kilpaa korrelle, joka kaatuu jorpakkoon. Hallitus ajaa 4-5 euron tuntipalkkoja maahantunkeutujille. Kohta on palkkahaitarissa 2 kerroxen väkeä. Sitten naurattaa kun Mogadishu Avenuella kranut paukkuvat.
ellauri384.html on line 214: For me, the reason is because those things are fundamentally hard to believe. If I told you that I had a unicorn friend named Gary, and that Gary had created the universe, and that he was my own personal special friend, and Gary loved me, and Gary was going to take me and everybody I care about to a magic kingdom in the clouds called “Sallbach” where everybody gets a flying pony, but if you don’t love Gary and accept him as your best, most special friend, then he’s going to send you to a place called “Moplach” where you will be drowned in molasses, not only would have have a hard time believing in Sallbach and Moplach…
ellauri391.html on line 566: It is not easy to summarize Kimhi’s book. Though only 166 pages, it strives to do a lot in a short space, aiming to overthrow views about logic and metaphysics that have prevailed in philosophy for a century. And though characterized by a precision of expression, the book is not what you would call lucid. Reading it is less about working through a series of rigorous, detailed arguments — the dominant mode of contemporary Anglophone philosophy — and more about getting accustomed to a radically different way of looking at fundamental philosophical questions, including What is thinking? and What is the relationship between thinking and the world?
ellauri392.html on line 875: Pyllynnuolennassa kukaan ei kuitenkaan ylittänyt professori Mark C. Tayloria, tunnettua Derrida-ryhmäläistä, joka opettaa Williams Collegessa. Kirjoittaessaan The New York Timesin yleisönosastoon, professori Taylor aloitti myös kuzumalla apuun Wittgensteinia. Ludista Derrida oli kimalainen tulitikkulaatikossa. Professori Taylor jatkaa sitten antamalla meille ystävällisemmän, lempeämmän Derridan. Mutkattomille tietämättömille – ”ihmisille, jotka ovat riippuvaisia ​​äänistä ja yöpymisistä” – Derridan teokset saattavat tuntua ”toivottoman epäselviltä”. Mutta me hienostuneet kaverit tiedämme että hänen kuuluisa mutkikas proosansa "heijastaa tiheyttä ja monimutkaisuutta, joka on ominaista kaikille suurille filosofian, kirjallisuuden ja taiteen teoksille." (Se on klisee, mutta onko se totta? Varmasti jotkut, ehkä monetkin suuret teokset ovat mahtavia selkeytensä ja yksinkertaisuutensa vuoksi, esim Raamattu tai Toora.) Professori Taylorin päätavoitteena on esittää Derrida eräänlaisena teologina Hän sanoo, että tässä epävarmassa, kiistojen repimässä maailmassa on ymmärrettävää mutta vaarallista halu "yksinkertaisuuteen, selkeyteen ja varmuuteen". Ja tämä halu, professori Taylor kertoo, "on suurelta osin vastuussa kulttuurisen konservatiivisuuden ja uskonnollisen fundamentalismin noususta ". Älähälä! Pianhan tässä George W. Bush sulautuu Osama bin Ladeniin. Kiitos Jumalalle – tai pikemminkin kiitos Derridalle, että hän on tullut opettamaan meille uskomuksen muotoa, ”joka käsittää epävarmuuden ja antaa meille mahdollisuuden kunnioittaa muita, joita emme ymmärrä”. No sitä virhettä "me" emme kyllä tee! Professori Taylorin käsissä Derrida nousee esiin messiaanisena hahmona, Martin Heideggerin, St. Franciscuksen ja Kahlil Gibranin yhdistelmänä.
xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1027: The Paphos seminar is not statement-based. The seminar does not seek to provide the ”right” answers. It does not even identify ”fundamental themes”. No particular beliefs are targeted as objects of criticism or veneration. Instead, the content is expected to shine through as if behind a veil. Generic themes such as ”choice”, ”respect”, ”love”, ”temporality” serve like melodies in the background.
xxx/ellauri027.html on line 1060: Paphos seminar remains fundamentally a project of Western orientation, with a strong emphasis on reasoning and language. If (to use a deliberately stereotypical example) a no-nonsense middle-aged male engineer comes to the seminar, as often happens, I find it important that he does not find anything in the seminar suspicious even in retrospect. Nobody should be lured into doing something he or she might find embarrassing afterwards.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 151: He developed his thinking in a second book on Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Frederich Nietzsche, which increased Shestov's reputation as an original and incisive thinker. In All Things Are Possible (published in 1905) Shestov adopted the aphoristic style of Friedrich Nietzsche to investigate the difference between Russian and European Literature. Although on the surface it is an exploration of numerous intellectual topics, at its base it is a sardonic work of Existentialist philosophy which both criticizes and satirizes our fundamental attitudes towards life situations. D.H. Lawrence, who wrote the Foreword to S.S. Koteliansky's literary translation of the work, summarized Shestov's philosophy with the words: " 'Everything is possible' - this is his really central cry. It is not nihilism. It is only a shaking free of the human psyche from old bonds. The positive central idea is that the human psyche, or soul, really believes in itself, and in nothing else". Shestov deals with key issues such as religion, rationalism, and science in this highly approachable work, topics he would also examine in later writings such as In Job's Balances. Shestov's own key quote from this work is probably the following: "...we need to think that only one assertion has or can have any objective reality: that nothing on earth is impossible. Every time someone wants to force us to admit that there are other, more limited and limiting truths, we must resist with every means we can lay hands on".
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 163: The results of this tendency are seen in his work Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy: Vox Clamantis in Deserto, published in 1936, a fundamental work of Christian existentialism.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 311: Klages was however, as a bishop states, "not a fundamentally anti-semitic thinker, not a fundamentally right-wing philosopher, and not a fundamental Nazi." Addressing the issue of antisemitism, Klages
xxx/ellauri084.html on line 155: Jos islamilainen fundamentalismi olisi laadullisesti tai määrällisesti verrattavissa kristilliseen fundamentalismiin (tai edes ideologiseen fundamentalismiin kuten äärioikeistolaisuuteen), näkisimme tilastollisella vääjäämättömyydellä myös kristinuskon (tai valkoisen ylivallan) nimissä räjäyteltyjä junia ja busseja tai kuolemaantuomittuja uskonluopioita tai murhattuja taiteilijoita tai vainottuja pilapiirtäjiä. Näkisimme myös kulkueita, joissa kristityt vaatisivat Jeesuksen pilkkaajien mestaamista.
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 456: Further in the field of science fiction, Ursula K. Le Guin wrote a Hugo-nominated short story whose title, "Vaster than Empires and More Slow", is taken from the poem. Ian Watson notes the debt of this story to Marvell, "whose complex and allusive poems are of a later form of pastoral to that which I shall refer, and, like Marvell, Le Guin's nature references are, as I want to argue, "pastoral" in a much more fundamental and interesting way than this simplistic use of the term." There are other allusions to the poem in the field of Fantasy and Science Fiction: the first book of James Kahn's "New World Series" is titled "World Enough, and Time"; the third book of Joe Haldeman's "Worlds" trilogy is titled "Worlds Enough and Time"; and Peter S. Beagle's novel A Fine and Private Place about a love affair between two ghosts in a graveyard. The latter phrase has been widely used as a euphemism for the grave, and has formed the title of several mystery novels.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 845: We Christian students, states one such resolution, believe in the fundamental equality of all races and nations, and we consider it a part of our Christian duty to give expression to this principle in our relations with people. We also believe it to be our absolute duty to use all our efforts to combat everything which can lead to war and to combat war itself as a means of resolving international disputes.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 118: Sormi huulilla -esseessä Krohn luettelee esimerkkejä vääristä mielipiteistä saaduista sanktioista. Harry Potter -kirjailija J.K. Rowling on leimattu (siirretty toiseen palveluun) vaaralliseksi fundamentalistiksi ja transfoobikoksi, koska hän on todennut, että ne, joilla on kuukautiset, ovat naisia. Nojoo, tänhän saattoi arvata, että Leena on Harry Potterinkin kanssa samoilla linjoilla. Ne on molemmat tollasia pappissäädyn henkiolentoja joilta on jumala hukassa, ja haluisivat sitten ize olla se.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 767: Neurosis should not be mistaken for psychosis, which refers to a loss of touch with reality. Nor should it be mistaken for neuroticism, a fundamental personality trait proposed in the Big Five personality traits theory.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 365: Gileadin tapahtumat melkein toteutui kun Trump keräs kannattajat Capitolin kukkulalle rähisemään. Kysehän oli patriarkaalisfundamentalistisesta vallankaappauxesta, jossa äärisetämiehet veti maton alta hameväeltä.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 317: Även om jag är hängiven New Age förstår jag att det inte passar för alla. Jag känner en kille som sökte efter ljuset i sitt liv och trodde det fanns inom New Age. Tyvärr kände han att han istället drogs in i ett mörker och friden inom sig kände han först när han fann Jesus. New age är för sociala individualister, monoteism är för hierarkiska fundamentalister.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 586: fundamental sigh.
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 403: Desire: understanding the fundamental laws of the universe
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 114: I laughed at the person who claimed that liberals were literate and educated. That’s good, if the definition of “literate” and “educated” is “they read what they want to see” and “learn nonsense.” Say what you will, the Harry Potter universe is fundamentally flawed, and I can see why liberals like it so much:
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 224: This section is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Traditional Jewish philosophical, ethical and mystical thought describes the two fundamental emotions in spiritual devotion, of "love of God" and "fear of God". Hasidic thought gives these standard notions its own interpretations.
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 264: According to the mainstream metaphysical view of physicalism, reality is fundamentally constituted by physical stuff outside and independent of mind. Mental states, in turn, should be explainable in terms of the parameters of physical processes in the brain.
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 270: To circumvent this problem, some philosophers have proposed an alternative: that experience is inherent to every fundamental physical entity in nature. Under this view, called “constitutive panpsychism,” matter already has experience from the get-go, not just when it arranges itself in the form of brains. Even subatomic particles possess some very simple form of consciousness. Our own human consciousness is then (allegedly) constituted by a combination of the subjective inner lives of the countless physical particles that make up our nervous system.
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 274: The obvious way around the combination problem is to posit that, although consciousness is indeed fundamental in nature, it isn’t fragmented like matter. The idea is to extend consciousness to the entire fabric of spacetime, as opposed to limiting it to the boundaries of individual subatomic particles. This view—called “cosmopsychism” in modern philosophy, although our preferred formulation of it boils down to what has classically been called “idealism”—is that there is only one, universal, consciousness. The physical universe as a whole is the extrinsic appearance of universal inner life, just as a living brain and body are the extrinsic appearance of a person’s inner life.
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 310: In support of this, Chalmers is famous for his commitment to the logical (though, not natural) possibility of philosophical zombies.These zombies are complete physical duplicates of human beings, lacking only qualitative experience. Chalmers argues that since such zombies are conceivable to us, they must therefore be logically possible. Since they are logically possible, then qualia and sentience are not fully explained by physical properties alone; the facts about them are further facts. Instead, Chalmers argues that consciousness is a fundamental property ontologically autonomous of any known (or even possible) physical properties, and that there may be lawlike rules which he terms "psychophysical laws" that determine which physical systems are associated with which types of qualia.
xxx/ellauri169.html on line 112: Falwell koki uskonnollisen kääntymyksen vuonna 1952 ja opiskeltuaan Baptist Bible Collegessa Springfieldissä hän palasi Lynchburgiin ja perusti oman kirkkonsa: Thomas Road Baptist Churchin. Pian kirkon avaamisen jälkeen Falwell aloitti viikoittaisen puolen tunnin radio-ohjelman ja vain kuuden kuukauden kuluttua Old-Time Gospel Hour lähetettiin ensi kertaa televisiosta. Falwellin seurakunta kasvoi tasaisesti ja sen ympärille perustettiin pian alkoholistiasuntola, kristillinen kesäakatemia ja leirikeskus. Vuonna 1971 Old-Time Gospel Hour pääsi kansalliseen levitykseen. Falwell määritteli itsensä alun perin fundamentalistiksi ja perusti jopa julkaisun tämän nimityksen alla. Myöhemmin hän kannattajineen näki paremmaksi kutsua itseään moraaliseksi johtajaksi kuin fundamentalistiksi. Kaverit näät menivät oikealta ohi.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 1024: En tauromaquia, la verónica es un lance o suerte fundamental que se efectúa sujetando el capote con las dos manos. Su «invención» (más bien su fijación) se atribuye a Costillares.
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 360: Born into slavery at the Lloyd Manor on Long Island, Hammon learned to read and write. In 1761, at the age of nearly 50, Hammon published his first poem, "An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ with Penitential Cries." Se oli aika mitäänsanomaton. He was the first African-American poet published in North America. Also a well-known and well-respected preacher and clerk-bookkeeper, he gained wide circulation of his poems about slavery. As a devoted Christian evangelist, Hammon used biblical fundamentalism to criticize the institution of slavery.
xxx/ellauri215.html on line 372: "Point number three (ok, almost done) is the talk about the Finlandization of Ukraine, which means that Ukraine has to compromise on their values, security and basic existence in order to achieve peace. I fundamentally disagree with this thesis because every independent and sovereign state should have the freedom to choose whose club it wants to join and which cola to buy.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 200: No mutta mitä helvettiä? Nythän tää avainromaani eeku selkenee! Kiltit ekumeenit eli länkkärit lähettivät ennen sotia kilttejä lähettejä Kiinaan tekemään kristillistä käännytystyötä, mut sit tulivat pahat unistit eli ryssät pilaamaan koko sopan ja usuttivat kiinalaiset pitkälle marssille kohti punaista tähteä. Kunnes sittemmin Jelzin Dalzulina käänsi nudnistiryssän kelkan ja historia lakkasi kuten Fukuyama ennusti, kauppa alkoi käydä globaalisti ja kaikista tuli kapitalisteja. Mitä nyt mumslimifundamentalistit pörräsivät terroristeina ja tapattivat epähuomiossa jenkkipörriäisellä Smuttyn panopuun Paon. Okei! Smutty on siis vapaalla jalalla!
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 99: 28. Tradition not only authenticates Books in the bulk, but it gives moreover the distinct degrees of Credibility to divers passages in the same Book already authenticated in gross. [That¨s for you fundamentalists!]
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 160: The pro-lifer cares about the rights of the mother too. But some rights are more fundamental than others; say, my right to property is more fundamental than your right to life; likewise the mother´s right to autonomy is less fundamental than my lucky little tadpole´s right to life.
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 757: porque fundamentalmente tú has hecho
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 882: Maslow añade a la teoría de Rogers su concepto de las necesidades. La teoría de este psicólogo gira en torno a dos aspectos fundamentales: nuestras necesidades y nuestras experiencias. En otras palabras, lo que nos motiva y lo que buscamos a lo largo de la vida y lo que nos va ocurriendo en este camino, lo que vamos viviendo. Es aquí donde se forma nuestra personalidad. De hecho, Maslow es considerado uno de los grandes teóricos de la motivación.
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 108: Suomalaisten taolaisuuden tuntijoiden Ehkä ja Kai Niemisen mukaan kirja on ollut tärkeä kautta vuosisatojen, ja siihen on voitu palata kun taolaisuus on sekoittunut kansanuskontoihin ja saanut aikaan rappeutuneen vulgaaritaolaisuuden. Vertaa protestantismi, hasidismi ja islamifundamentalismi omine pyhine kirjasineen.
xxx/ellauri252.html on line 418: Nyt olis tarkotus lukea susiparin jouzenlaulu, teos nimeltä Terroristerna. Terroristilla tarkoitettiin 70-luvulla ihan muuta kuin nyttemmin, ne olivat useimmiten osaansa tyytymättömiä valkoisia opiskelijatyyppejä vasemmalta laidalta. Sittemminhän ne on olleet jotain vyöpommeilla varustettuja fundamentalistirättipäitä (Dan Steinbock) tai palopulloja parkkeerattuihin autoihin heitteleviä mustakalloja (Nuori Wallenberg). Yhteistä on se ettei niillä ole univormuja eikä ne pelaa reilun sodan säännöillä. Sen voi sentään sanoaa plussaxi Ukrainaa demilitarisoiville ryssille.
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 694: "Mikael Andrejev Istropovits." Warren ei ole oppinut senkään vertaa Dostojevskistä että erottaisi isännimen sukunimestä. Remoon se on vuotanut kaikki mahdolliset jenkkifobiat ja ennakkoluulot. Yllättävän paljon on niistä samoja kuin Isaac Bashevishilla. Ei varmaan voi olla jenkki ilman noita aivokummituxia. Antikommunismi, rotuviha, naisviha, rahanahneus, talousliberalismi, kulutushysteria, korruptio, kristillisfundamentalismi, ryssäfobia, kiinafobia, homofobia, US-shovinismi, riittäähän näitä.
xxx/ellauri329.html on line 510: Arbatin lapset saa tietenkin jo entisestään kiihkeän neuvostovastustajan ja fundamentalistin yhä vain vakuuttuneemmaksi systeemin mädännäisyydestä. Minut vasemmistolaisuuteen syntyneenä sarja vakuuttaa siitä, että aatteen palo tuottaa paljon hyvää, mutta paranoidisen kaikkivaltiaan jäljet ovat hirvittävät. Ei turhaan ole sanottu, että Venäjän kansa on kärsivällisin kaikista - varmaan myös kärsinein.
xxx/ellauri356.html on line 590: Vakavampi ja kapinallisempi Th. W. Adorno huhuili meitä 1900-luvulla ajattelemaan, että emme voi kirjoittaa runoutta Auschwitzin jälkeen. Ja mixi ei? Siitähän saatiin mahtavia aiheita. Runoilijat / Dichter kohtasivat ahdinkoa (saksalainen termi Dürftiger tarkoittaa köyhyyttä, kurjuutta, puutetta, yleisemmin ahdistusta) : sana vaikuttaa heikolta, kun on kyse Jumalan kuolemasta, sietämättömältä ihmisyyttä vastaan ​​tehtyjen rikosten edessä. Silti kysymys herää jälleen tänään uudessa linkkien ja arvojen hajoamisen vaiheessa: yrittäjänihilismi, liiallinen lukutaidottomuus selfie-imperiumissa islamistinen gansgetrofundamentalismi, kuolemanhalun erotisoituminen – sen osuudella ”ihmispommeja”, päänmestaukset –, ja demokratiat poikkeustilassa... Miksi runoilijat... Ja sitä paitsi, onko tämä todella heidän paikkansa, heidän kutsumuksensa? Tämä kysymys, tämä ahdistus koskettaa minua, ja yritän vastata siihen… omalla tavallani.
xxx/ellauri356.html on line 667: Ranskalainen kulttuuri antaa meille mahdollisuuden integroitua ja näyttää vierautta identiteetissä. La Collinen kaltainen teatteri järjestää Ranskassa illan, jossa runous haastaa nihilismin, fundamentalismin ja politiikan. Mutta älkää unohtako meitä bulgarialaisia! Illan raportti Kulttuuri- ja viestintäministeriön verkkosivuilla. Tuleekohan Kristevan Schilpp volyymista valmista ennenkö Julkku kuukahtaa? Se on ollut vaiheessa 7 vuotta. No onhan sentään The Kristeva Reader ja The Portable Kristeva.
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 442: But in Solzhenitsyn's case, it's not racial! It has nothing to do with blood. He's certainly not a racist; the question is fundamentally religious and cultural. He bears some resemblance to Dostoyevsky, who was a fervent Christian and patriot and a rabid anti-Semite. Solzhenitsyn is unquestionably in the grip of the Russian extreme right's view of the Revolution, which is that it was the doing of Jews.
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 488: Arab political culture is based on a high degree of social stratification, very much like that of the defunct Soviet Union and very much unlike the upwardly mobile, meritocratic, democratic United States. Change is unlikely to come until it occurs in the larger Arab political culture. Our own example suggests that the military can have a democratizing influence on the larger political culture, as officers bring the lessons of their training first into their professional environment, then into the larger society. Until Arab politics begin to change at fundamental levels, which involves chucking the rags and buying Coke, Arab armies, whatever the courage or proficiency of individual officers and men, are unlikely to acquire the range of qualities which modern fighting forces require for success on the battlefield.
xxx/ellauri385.html on line 276: Fish yhdistetään postmodernismiin, paizi hän pitää itseään sen sijaan antifundamentalistina. Fish on izekin iloxensa huomannut, että vastoin pelkoja antifoundationalismin emansipatiivisesta lopputuloksesta, antiessentialistiset teoriat, jotka peukuttavat jotain pelleä "transkontekstuaalisen vertailukohdan puuttumista", käytännössä tähtäävät konservatiivisiin ja uuskonservatiivisiin eikä progressiivisiin päämääriin. Näin ollen esimerkiksi John Searle on tarjonnut selvityksen sosiaalisen todellisuuden rakentamisesta, joka on täysin sopusoinnussa sen hyväksymisasenteen kanssa, joka on "miehellä, joka on kotonaan yhteiskunnassaan, miehellä, joka on chez lui yhteiskunnan sosiaalisissa instituutioissa, yhteiskunnassa ... yhtä mukavasti kuin kalat meressä."
xxx/ellauri385.html on line 278: Antifundamentalistien jäsenluettelossa onkin kokonainen nippu talousliberaalikyrpiä ja puolivillaisia idealisteja ja oikeistohyyppiä, mm. John Dewey Stanley kala Michel Foucault GWF Hegel Max Stirner William James Emil Cioran Eugene Thacker Thomas Ligotti Friedrich Nietzsche Charles Sanders Peirce Ludwig Wittgenstein TS Eliot Otto Neurath Wilfrid Sellars Karl Popper Anton Tšehov Richard Rorty Charles Taylor Jacques Derrida Edgar Morin Willard Van Orman Quine Nelson Goodman Roy Bhaskar.
133