Burn in hell Pelagius, go jump in the fiery lake! Vitun humanisti!
ellauri219.html on line 798: No it is not because of the clash in values between American individualism and libertarianism, and the rest of the West’s social democracy and collectivism. That’s a contributing factor among those with enough cultural affinity and exposure to get to know how the US ticks, which maybe explains some of the last decade or so, with the Internet. But again, the “Death to Amreeka” crowds, the sneering at the unsophisticated doughboys, the dismissal of American culture—all that predated that deep familiarity by decades. The discovery of the substantive cultural mismatches were again a late addition and confirmation bias. (How I like the scientific sound of it: confirmation bias.)
ellauri221.html on line 110: Narcissistic personality disorder was nearly dropped from the DSM V. Narcissistic personality disorder was first defined in 1967. The DSM-IV defines the essential feature of narcissism as "a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy that begins in early adulthood and is present in a variety of contexts." It's a definition that was set before the rise of social networking, reality TV, or partisan news channels designed to confirm our every opinion. Perhaps it truly is time to update it.
ellauri222.html on line 115: The subject of “Augie March” is the same as the subject of “Dangling Man” and “The Victim”: the danger of becoming trapped in other people’s definition of you. In the case of “Augie March,” the person in danger of being trapped was Saul Bellow. “This was not what being a novelist was supposed to have meant”: he is referring to the expectations of his intellectual backers. He realized that he didn’t want to be the great hope of the novel or to give voice to a generation’s angst. He wanted to write up the life he knew in the way James Joyce had written up the life he knew, and to transform it into a fantastic verbal artifact, a book that broke all the rules.
ellauri222.html on line 247: Mitä vetoa että Rothin kuikelo veti tästä herneen nenään? Sai takuulla paskahalvauxen. No, Saul was definitely not a good friend. Phil said something like: ‘He wouldn’t be the first guy whose companionship I’d seek out in the afterlife.’”
ellauri222.html on line 773:

Ihmiset kysyvät myös: What is a simple definition of transcendentalism?

ellauri222.html on line 929: For n≤4 and any bounded smooth domain Ω⊂ℝ n , we establish the existence of a global weak solution for the Landau-Lifshitz equation on Ω with respect to smooth initial-boundary data, which is smooth off a closed set with locally finite n-dimensional parabolic Hausdorff measure. The approach is based on the Ginzburg-Landau approximation, a time slice energy monotonicity inequality, and an energy decay estimate under the smallness of renormalized Ginzburg-Landau energies.
ellauri223.html on line 137: Later on, the philosopher Baruch Spinoza also agreed with the doctrine, when he said: “By reality and perfection I mean the same thing” (Ethics, part II, definition VI). Leibniz adhered to the doctrine as well, as do the Baha'i. Elämme parhaassa mahdollisessa maailmassa, ystävä hyvä. Mitä puppua.
ellauri223.html on line 141: Homo mensura est appellatio doctrinae, quam Protagoras prima sententia libri sui de veritate (Ἀλήθεια) scripti exposuit. Primum testimonium huius sententiae apud Platonem invenitur, sed quia enuntiato infinitivo constracta est, oratio recta apud Sextum Empiricum et Diogenem Laertium servata saepe citari solet:
ellauri236.html on line 210: One ought not to infer too much from the success of Mr. Chase's books. It is possible that it is an isolated phenomenon, brought about by the mingled boredom and brutality of war. (LOL) But if such books should definitely acclimatize themselves in England (or Nigeria!), instead of being merely a half-understood import from America, there would be good grounds for dismay. In choosing Raffles as a background for No Orchids I deliberately chose a book which by the standards of its time was morally equivocal. Raffles, as I have pointed out, has no real moral code, no religion, certainly no social consciousness. All he has is a set of reflexes the nervous system, as it were, of a gentleman. Give him a sharp tap on this reflex or that (they are called ‘sport’, ‘pal’, ‘woman’, ‘king and country’ and so forth), and you get a predictable reaction. In Mr. Chase's books there are no gentlemen and no taboos. Emancipation is complete. Freud and Machiavelli have reached the outer suburbs. Comparing the schoolboy atmosphere of the one book with the cruelty and corruption of the other, one is driven to feel that snobbishness, like hypocrisy, is a check upon behaviour whose value from a social point of view has been underrated.
ellauri243.html on line 169: There may be no other organ on the human body that profits from such creativity in nicknaming by the larger populace. Not even clam, or twat. Below is a list of 100+ slang words for penis—from the common (prick) to the more grotesque (fuckpole) and the awesomely ridiculous (pork sword). Next time you need a synonym for penis, comb through this definitive list for a bunch of fun ideas!
ellauri243.html on line 182: There may be no other organ on the human body that profits from such creativity in nicknaming by the larger populace. Except penis. Below is a list of 60+ slang words for vagina —from the common (pussy) to the more grotesque (cunt) and the awesomely ridiculous (fishmarket). Next time you need a synonym for vulva, comb through this definitive list for a bunch of fun ideas!
ellauri244.html on line 567: Part Four focuses on the period several hundred years after Jonathan and his students have left the Flock and their teachings become venerated rather than practiced. The birds spend all their time extolling the virtues of Jonathan and his students and spend no time flying for flying's sake. The seagulls practice strange rituals and use demonstrations of their respect for Jonathan and his students as status symbols. Eventually some birds reject the ceremony and rituals and just start flying. Eventually one bird named Anthony Gull questions the value of living since "...life is pointless and since pointless is by definition meaningless then the only proper act is to dive into the ocean and drown. Better not to exist at all than to exist like a seaweed, without meaning or joy [...] He had to die sooner or later anyway, and he saw no reason to prolong the painful boredom of living." As Anthony makes a dive-bomb to the sea, at a speed and from an altitude which would kill him, a white blur flashes alongside him. Anthony catches up to the blur, which turns out to be a seagull, and asks what the bird was doing:
ellauri245.html on line 677: Its 2022, Im 56 yrs old (born 1966 that is), kids grown, 5am, and feeling a little menopausal. Came back to a song that from the 1st time I heard it in my teens, I pictured the guy of my dreams singing to me. (Definitely not this wimpy tenor Chris with thinning bangles, but another more manly guy.) Didn´t we all? Definitely a classic! Greetings to us all narcissistic women of the eighties!
ellauri247.html on line 513: What does fantassin mean? - definitions
ellauri254.html on line 294: Runoilijan perhe-elämä ei ollut helppoa. Bloc todella palvoi valittua, mutta hän oli vakuuttunut siitä, että avioliiton tärkein henkinen affiniteetti ei ollut fyysinen vaan epäfyysinen. Tämän seurauksena hänen vaimonsa sai paljon miesystäviä. Lubov Mendeleeva oli näyttelijä ja siksi hän teki helposti romaaneja. Blok huomasi tässä harrastuksessa sekä nöyryyttä että köyrintää. Yhden tällaisen romaanin jälkeen hänen vaimollaan on poika, ja Blok tunnistaa hänet Tonyn tekemäxi. Blok tykkää vaimostaan näissä hetkissä ja tukahduttaa vihaa, kateutta ja aggressiota. Kaiken hän on valmis kestämään vaimoltaan muttei tätä. Block oli valmis sietämään kaikenlaiset sarvettajat jos heillä oli hyvä suhde hänen vaimonsa kanssa. Mutta hän ymmärsi lopulta että vaimon isokainalo oli pohjaton kuilu, ja lopulta he erosivat. Hänellä oli sittemmin naisia, joita hän muutti kuin käsineitä. Block puhui heistä: "Myrkky - toisen myrkyn jälkeen".
ellauri256.html on line 503: The most widely accepted modern definition of the "Western World" is based not upon geographical location but upon the cultural (or when appropriate, political or economic) identities of the countries in question. Using this definition, the Western World includes Europe as well as any countries whose cultures are strongly influenced by European values or whose populations include many people descended from European colonists—for example Australia, New Zealand, and most countries in North and South America .
ellauri256.html on line 505: By the mid-20th century, Western culture had become widespread throughout the world with the help of mass media, such as television, film, radio, and music. The term "Western culture" is used broadly to refer to traditions, social norms, religious beliefs, technologies, and political systems. Because the culture is so widespread today, the term "Western World" has taken on a cultural, economic, and political definition—but those definitions can differ from one another.
ellauri257.html on line 73: The cocky and arrogant Taras raises two sons, Andrei (Tony Curtis) and Ostap (Perry Lopez), and eventually sends them to Kiev University to learn how their enemies think. The independent-minded Andrei falls in love with Natalia (Christine Kaufmann), a young beautiful Polish noblewoman, but her family deems him unworthy of her because of his lowly birth. The heartbroken Andrei returns home to the steppes and his bloodthirsty barbarian warrior father—definitely not a college grad.
ellauri260.html on line 262: The denial of the Heavenly Dad had its various stages. Positivism was one of the mildest types, they just put the cosmic problem aside. More drastic was the radical German philosophy, particularly Neo-Hegelianism. The leader was Ludwig Feuerbach, who won large numbers of adherents by the definiteness of his statements and the glow of his eloquence. Religion, like everything supersensual, seemed to him "outworn." Engels, who was an ardent follower of Feuerbach, said : " We have done with God." NIetzsche, my competitor for Religion seemed to Feuerbach an illegitimate extension to the whole scheme of things of man's ideas and aspirations : a mischievous illusion which weakened the power of men and distracted them from their proper aims. His ideas are easily gathered from these words of his : " God was my first, reason my second, man my third and final thought."
ellauri260.html on line 302: Socialisation alone will give the Socialistic life a definite embodiment. It confidently enters upon a struggle against the distraction and the egoism of individuals. The traditional idea of work makes a man think mainly of his own profit. It impels him to think first of all of himself.
ellauri260.html on line 312: Neither individual nor community must make concern about material things its chief business. The indefinite craving of the individual is a lower impulse that must be checked in every way, and all hunting after money for its own sake must be branded a danger- ous aberration. And as this ideal regards economic activity merely as a means to higher ends, it does not bring the two together in one whole and cannot recognise any particular economic legislation
ellauri262.html on line 442: Personism is an ethical philosophy of personhood as typified by the thought of the utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer. It amounts to a branch of secular humanism with an emphasis on certain rights-criteria. Personists believe that rights are conferred to the extent that a creature is a person. Michael Tooley provides the relevant definition of a person, saying it is a creature that is "capable of desiring to continue as a subject of experience and other mental states". A worldview like secular humanism is personism when the empathy and values are extended to the extent that the creature is a person (apes get very similar rights, insects get vastly fewer rights, etc.).
ellauri262.html on line 445: Consequently, a member of the human species may not necessarily fit the definition of "person" and thereby not receive all the rights bestowed to a person. Hence, such philosophers have engaged in arguing that certain disabled individuals (such as those with a mental capacity that is similar to or is perceived as being similar to an infant) are not persons. This philosophy is also supposedly open to the idea that such non-human persons as machines, animals, and extraterrestrial intelligences may be entitled to certain rights currently granted only to humans. The basic criteria for the entitlement of rights, are the intellect (thinking ability, problem solving in real life circumstances and not mere calculation), and sometimes empathy (but not necessarily, because not all humans are empathetic; but indifference in the pain of others and crime are certainly criteria for the deprivation of rights. Genuine empathy is not required to achieve acceptable behavior, but a digital limbic system and a dopaminergic pathways alternative, would deliver a more acceptable result for future MPs judging on rights expansion.). Personism may have views in common with transhumanism.
ellauri264.html on line 85: L’action du drame se passe à Mayence, au quartier général des armées françaises en 1793. Les officiers soupçonnent de trahison d’Oyron, un de leurs camarades, d’origine aristocratique. Une lettre saisie sur un paysan rhénanien semble prouver la trahison de d’Oyron. Rolland avait l’intention de démontrer son impartialité. Pour atteindre ce but, il voulait que l’innocence de d’Oyron ne pût être établie de manière définitive.
ellauri264.html on line 88: Dans sa réaction violente contre le milieu à la fois dreyfusard et juif auquel il est intimement lié malgré lui, Rolland perd toute impartialité et finit pas assimiler les défenseurs de Dreyfus aux Juifs. La cause dreyfusarde, c’est la campagne des Juifs ou celle de la Banque juive. En realite, la plupart d’entre eux se tenaient à l’écart. Les Juifs ne voulaient pas qu’on les accuse de prendre parti pour Dreyfus parce qu’il était, comme eux, Juif.
ellauri264.html on line 679: Definitely one of the darkest stories about Steve Jobs has to be the Breakout story. In the 1970’s, Steve Jobs was working for Atari, designing the game Breakout. Overwhelmed with work with a deadline quickly approaching, he approached Steve Wozniak for help in finishing his project within the next four days. In exchange for his help, Jobs offered Woz half of what he was earning, which he said was $700. For four days, Jobs and Wozniak worked day and night without sleep. When they were done, they were sick with mono and exhausted, but they finished the project before the deadline. Wozniak got his… (more)
ellauri266.html on line 277: Definitely could have been better!!
ellauri275.html on line 446: The Georgian poets were, by the strictest definition, those whose works appeared in a series of five anthologies named Georgian Poetry, published by Harold Monro and edited by Edward Marsh, the first volume of which contained poems written in 1911 and 1912. The group included Edmund Blunden, Rupert Brooke, Robert Graves, D. H. Lawrence, Walter de la Mare, Siegfried Sassoon, and John Drinkwater. Until the final two volumes, the decision had not been taken to include female poets.
ellauri275.html on line 448: The period of publication was sandwiched between the Victorian era, with its strict classicism, and Modernism, with its strident rejection of pure aestheticism. The common features of the poems in these publications were romanticism, sentimentality, and hedonism. Later critics have attempted to revise the definition of the term as a description of poetic style, thereby including some new names or excluding some old ones. W. H. Davies, a contemporary, is sometimes included within the grouping, although his "innocent style" differs markedly from that of the others.
ellauri277.html on line 80: For to be idle is to become a stranger unto the seasons, and to step out of life’s procession, that marches in majesty and proud submission towards the infinite.
ellauri277.html on line 182: Vuonna 1921 Gibran osallistui "kyselyyn", joka koski kysymystä "Tarvitsemmeko uuden maailman uskonnon yhdistämään vanhoja uskontoja? Vai piisaako tää St. Mark´s Church in -the-Bowery?" Gibran ei ottanut definitiivistä kantaa.
ellauri277.html on line 274: Тhe article discusses the role of religious values in the context of spiritual safety of society. The value content of the concept of spiritual security is substantiated. It is proved that the system of spiritual values and moral norms is one of the important conditions for ensuring the spiritual security of society. The basic principles of providing spiritual security and suggested of definition the relevant concepts.
ellauri277.html on line 279: Also, reviews the new approaches to the definition of spiritual safety and substantiates the expedience of using traditional and sociological approaches for that purpose. The peculiarities of
ellauri278.html on line 216: On 6 February 1933, Litvinov made the most-significant speech of his career, in which he tried to define aggression. He stated the internal situation of a country, alleged maladministration, possible danger to foreign residents, and civil unrest in a neighbouring country were not justifications for war. This speech became the authority when war was justified. British politician Anthony Eden had said; "to try to define aggression was a trap for the innocent and protection for the guilty". In 1946, the British Government supported Litvinov’s definition of aggression by accusing the Soviet Union of not complying with Litvinov’s definition of aggression. Finland made similar criticisms against the Soviet Union in 1939.
ellauri278.html on line 250: 1941 Litvinov was definitively given the sack. LItvinov was livid. Stalin rejected everything Litvinov had said. When Stalin stopped speaking, Litvinov asked: "Does that mean you consider me an enemy of the people?" Stalin answered: "We do not consider you an enemy of the people, but too honest a revolutionary".
ellauri281.html on line 215: On 6 February 1933, Litvinov made the most-significant speech of his career, in which he tried to define aggression. He stated the internal situation of a country, alleged maladministration, possible danger to foreign residents, and civil unrest in a neighbouring country were not justifications for war. This speech became the authority when war was justified. British politician Anthony Eden had said; "to try to define aggression was a trap for the innocent and protection for the guilty". In 1946, the British Government supported Litvinov’s definition of aggression by accusing the Soviet Union of not complying with Litvinov’s definition of aggression. Finland made similar criticisms against the Soviet Union in 1939.
ellauri281.html on line 249: 1941 Litvinov was definitively given the sack. LItvinov was livid. Stalin rejected everything Litvinov had said. When Stalin stopped speaking, Litvinov asked: "Does that mean you consider me an enemy of the people?" Stalin answered: "We do not consider you an enemy of the people, but too honest a revolutionary".
ellauri285.html on line 147: Though it is often mistaken to imply that no way of seeing the world can be taken as definitively true, perspectivism can instead be interpreted as holding certain interpretations (such as that of perspectivism itself) to be definitively true :D .
ellauri285.html on line 811: Former CFO, currently on a soul searching mission without a definitive future plans.
ellauri301.html on line 502: Frågan är: känns den här bilden av 1100-talet och dess människor trovärdig? Svaret är nå ja, eller rättare sagt nej för helvete. Det låter som Connecticut Yankee i King Arthurs hov. Följdfrågan blir: är den intressant? Svaret blir igen nå ja, gäsp, definitivt. Men då svarar man inte längre som historiker utan som en människa uppväxt i det 20:e seklet som har sett tusentals likadana kostymhistorier såsom Peter Englund (2015). Arnin haaskalle palaan albumissa 387.
ellauri321.html on line 182: There is room for every body in America; has he any particular talent, or industry? he exerts it in order to procure a livelihood, and it succeeds. Is he a merchant? the avenues of trade are infinite; is he eminent in any respect? he will be employed and respected. Does he love a country life? pleasant farms present themselves; he may purchase what he wants, and thereby become an American farmer. Is he a labourer, sober and industrious? he need not go many miles, nor receive many informations before he will be hired, well fed at the table of his employer, and paid four or five times more than he can get in Europe. Does he want uncultivated lands? Thousands of acres present themselves, which he may purchase cheap. Whatever be his talents or inclinations, if they are moderate, he may satisfy them. I do not mean that every one who comes will grow rich in a little time; no, but he may procure an easy, decent low maintenance, by his industry. Instead of starving he will be fed, instead of being idle he will have employment; and these are riches enough for such men as come over here.
ellauri324.html on line 159: Vous devez sans doute avoir une mauvaise définition de Dieu. Non, Dieu n'est pas une espèce de Père Noël en barbe blanche assis sur le bord d'un nuage contemplant son oeuvre: l'Univers. Non, Dieu est l'Univers visible et invisible, crée et incrée. Il est UN et omniscient issu du Néant. Dieu, si on voulait une image serait le seul trou noir super massif possible. Cette réalité, si on l'envisage, est la source même de la religion et cela induit nécessairement que nous n'avons aucun libre arbitre. Nous sommes, que nous le voulions ou non, au fond du trou de Dieu.
ellauri325.html on line 310: Viihdetalkoisiin osallistui myös Iloisen Juuston kirjoittaja Jussi Talvi, josta on paasaus ja kuvakin Maila Talvion vieressä naziseurassa albumissa 24. Jussin telenovelassa Martti pihkaantuu Kansallisoopperan tanssijattareen Eva Marianneen, jättää Ingridin ja panttaa arvoesineensä saadaxeen oopperalipppuja. Panttilainaamon juutalainen kumartuu yli tiskin ja varoittaa: Kuule nuori mies varo naista, hiän tuomas vain pelkkä paha. Mielenkiintoista on että juutas käyttää preesensmuotona 3tta infinitiiviä Wolfram Rothin tavalla. Tässä välissä terässinfonia idästä puhkes jälleen. Ja voi vizi! Täähän kirjoitus on puhdasta antisemitismiä! Martti vaihtaa takas Ingridiin tajutessaan että Eva Marianne on ko. jutkun tytär! Martti ei pidä blondista jos se on pesemällä saatu.
ellauri326.html on line 438: Olga Skabeyeva said on state-owned Rossiya 1 TV: "It can safely be called World War Three. That's entirely for sure. [...] We're definitely fighting against NATO infrastructure, if not NATO itself. We need to recognise that." She has further claimed that NATO is supplying Ukraine with "zillions of weapons". (Which is entirely true, see the list.)
ellauri333.html on line 61: Given Ashoka's particularly moral definition of "Dharma" it is possible that he simply wants to say that buddhist virtue and piety now exist from the Mediterranean to the south of India. An expansion of Buddhism to the West is unconfirmed historically. Valehteli raukka nälissään. The edicts put forward moral rules which are extremely short, aphoristic expressions, the subjects being discussed, the vocabulary itself, are all hardly worth an elephant turd. Ashoka used the expression Dhaṃma Lipi (Prakrit in the Brahmi script: 𑀥𑀁𑀫𑀮𑀺𑀧𑀺, "Inscriptions of the Dharma") to describe his own Edicts. According to the edicts, the extent of Buddhist proselytism during this period reached as far as the Mediterranean, and many Buddhist monuments were created.
ellauri333.html on line 98: Seleucus multa in Oriente post divisionem inter socios regni Macedonici bella gessit. Principio Babyloniam cepit; inde auctis ex victoria viribus Bactrianos expugnavit. Transitum deinde in Indiam fecit, quae post mortem Alexandra, veluti a cervicibus iugo servitutis excusso, praefectos eius occiderat. Auctor libertatis Sandrocottus fuerat, sed titulum libertatis post victoriam in servitutem verterat ; siquidem occupato regno populum, quem ab externa dominatione vindicaverat, ipse servitio premebat. Fuit de humili quidem genere natus, sed ad regni potestatem maiestate numinis inpulsus. Quippe cum procacitate sua Nandrum regem offendisset, interfici a rege iussus salutem pedum celeritate quaesierat Ex qua fatigatione cum somno captus iaceret, leo ingentis formae ad dormientem accessit sudoremque profluentem lingua ei detersit expergefactumque blande reliquit. Hoc prodigio primum ad spem regni inpulsus contractis latronibus Indos ad novitatem regni sollicitavit. Molienti deinde bellum adversus praefectos Alexandri elephantus ferus infinitae magnitudinis ultra se obtulit et veluti domita mansuetudine eum tergo excepit duxque belli et proeliator insignis fuit. Sic adquisito regno Sandrocottus ea tempestate, qua Seleucus futurae magnitudinis fundamenta iaciebat, Indiam possidebat, cum quo facta pactione Seleucus conpositisque in Oriente rebus in bellum Antigoni descendit.
ellauri333.html on line 245: Created in 2015, the Angry Hanuman is everywhere now – on buses, windscreens, public walls and T-shirts. Acharya clarifies that this angry makeover is aimed at making the humble, ever servile image of a Bhakt appear powerful, not oppressive. But man is still the measure of most things in India and power remains central to a man’s definition. As general belief goes, celibacy in a male will further increase this precious power manifold. So Hanuman, the celibate Bhakt, becomes an ape symbol for the new and aggressive variety of macho in India that is already denying privacy and freedom of speech to women vehemently through fringe groups such as the Bajrang Dal and Ram Sene.
ellauri336.html on line 362: It is definitely not from the Torah. This is not Jewish law. It’s a custom that came later. There’s a debate as to why.
ellauri336.html on line 413: mind shaving as this is there understanding of Jewish law. In places where there is coercion around shaving, that’s definitely a problem. Men have plenty of stringent commandments as well in the most insular circles.
ellauri345.html on line 283: Sitten viimeisen ja vaikeimman alistuman jälkeen, jonka hän pystyi tekemään, yli kolmekymmentä vuotta kestäneessä avioliitonvastaisessa taistelussaan antautumisen jälkeen, joka näytti hänestä myyttisen virzanpidätyksen symbolina, tämä yritys romahti ja vuosi avioliittonsa jälkeen, joka oli pakotettu häneen kohtalokkaiden painostuksen päivinä, hän aloitti valinnaiset affiniteetit, joilla hän esitti yhä voimakkaamman protestin, joka kehittyi hänen myöhemmässä työssään maailmaa vastaan, jonka kanssa hänen miehyytensä oli tehnyt sopimuksen. Valinnaiset affiniteetit ovat käännekohta tässä työssä. Heillä alkaa hänen tuotantonsa viimeinen sarja, joista hän ei päässyt täysin irti, koska heidän sydämensä pysyi hänessä elossa loppuun asti. Joten koskettava asia vuodelta 1820 annetussa päiväkirjamerkinnässä on se, että hän "alkoi lukea valinnaisia affiniteettia", samoin kuin Heinrich Lauben raportoiman kohtauksen sanaton ironia: "Eräs nainen sanoi Goethea vastaan valinnaisista suhteista: En osaa lukea, mutta tuskin hyväksyn tämän kirjan ollenkaan, herra von Goethe; Se on todella moraalitonta, enkä suosittele sitä kenellekään naiselle. - Sitten Goethe oli hetken erittäin vakavasti hiljaa ja sanoi lopulta vilpittömästi: Anteeksi, se on minun paras kirjani. Muut ovat vielä paljon kehnompia."
ellauri345.html on line 379: Hänen kuvastonsa on pohjimmiltaan epämaalainen; sitä voidaan kutsua muoviksi, ehkä stetoskooppiseksi. Se vaikuttaa myös novellistiselta. Laajuudestaan huolimatta valinnaiset affiniteetit säilyivät novellistisina. Ilmaisun kestävyyden kannalta ne eivät ole parempia kuin niiden sisältämä varsinainen novelli.
ellauri345.html on line 381: Mestarissa ja Elective Affinitiesissa taiteellisen tyylin määrää ehdottomasti se, että tunnemme narsistisen kertojan kaikkialla. Simmel kutsuu sitä kahteen kertaan ulostetuxi. Goethe varaa mustasukkaisesti oikeuden hallita yksin runoutensa alueella.
ellauri345.html on line 418: Gundolf voi siis puhua "tämän teoksen patoksesta" "ei vähemmän traagisen ylevänä ja järkyttävänä kuin se, josta Sophoclean Oidipus tulee". Ennen häntä Francois-Poncet oli tehnyt jotain vastaavaa vanhentuneessa, paxuxi paisuneessa kirjassaan "affinites valinnaisista aineista". Ja silti tämä on virheellisin tuomio. Sillä sankarin traagisissa sanoissa päätöksen harjalle on kiivetty, jonka alla myytin syyllisyys ja viattomuus nielevät toisensa kuiluun. Velkaantumisen ja viattomuuden lisäksi tämä maailma perustuu hyvään ja pahaan, mikä on vain sankarin ulottuvilla, mutta ei koskaan arkalla tytöllä. Siksi on tyhjää puhetta ylistää heidän "traagista puhdistumistaan". Mikään ei voisi olla epätraagisempaa kuin tämä surullinen loppu.
ellauri345.html on line 472: Hän ei halunnut antaa runoilijalle vähintäkään omia oikeuksiaan. Avioliitto ei voi olla romaanin keskipiste missään mielessä. Lukemattomien muiden tavoin Hebbel oli tässä täysin väärässä sanoessaan: "Yksi puoli Goethen valinnaisista yhteyksistä on jäänyt abstraktiksi; nimittäin avioliiton mittaamattomasta merkityksestä valtiolle ja ihmiskunnalle on vihjattu argumentoivalla tavalla, mutta se ei soi esityksessä, mikä olisi kuitenkin ollut mahdollista ja olisi suuresti vahvistanut vaikutelmaa koko teoksesta. Ja aiemmin "Maria Magdalenan" esipuheessa; "Kuinka Goethe, joka oli ehdottomasti taiteilija, suuri taiteilija, saattoi tehdä niin loukkauksen sisäistä muotoa vastaan ​​valinnaisissa affiniteeteissaan, että hän, toisin kuin hajamielinen dissekteeri, toi anatomiseen teatteriin automaatin todellisen ruumiin sijasta. Omalaatuista. "En voinut selittää sitä tosiasiaa, että hän solmi turhan, jopa moraalittoman avioliiton, kuten Eduardin ja Charlotten välillä, hänen kuvauksensa keskipisteessä ja käsitteli ja käytti tätä suhdetta ikään kuin se olisi täysin päinvastainen, täysin laillinen." 
ellauri345.html on line 510: Saman vuoden elokuussa Goethe kirjoitti lopullisen version kolmannesta luvusta Elective Affinitiesin toisesta osasta, jossa Ottilien päiväkirjassa sanotaan: "Ajatus muinaisista kansoista on vakava ja voi näyttää kamalalta. He kuvittelivat esi-isänsä suurissa luolissa istumassa valtaistuimilla ympäriinsä, hiljaisessa keskustelussa. He nousivat seisomaan ja kumarsivat tervetulleeksi sisään tulleen tulokkaan, jos tämä oli tarpeeksi arvokas. Eilen, kun istuin kappelissa ja näin useita muita istuvan ympärilleni veistettyä tuoliani vastapäätä, tuo ajatus vaikutti minusta hyvin ystävälliseltä ja siroilta. Mikset voi istua? Ajattelin itsekseni istua hiljaa ja uppoutuneena sinuun pitkään, pitkään, kunnes vihdoin tulevat ystävät, joille nouset ylös ja näytät heille paikkansa ystävällisellä kumartamalla."
ellauri345.html on line 516: Draamakomedian mysteeri on se hetki, jolloin se projisoi oman kielensä ulottuvuudesta korkeampaan, johon se ei pääse. Sitä ei siksi voi koskaan ilmaista sanoin, vaan vain esityksenä; se on "dramaattinen" suppeimmassa merkityksessä. Analoginen esityshetki on laskeva tähti valinnaisissa affiniteeteissa. Sen lisäksi, että sen eeppinen perusta on myyttinen, sen lyyrinen laajuus intohimossa ja taipumuksissa, sen dramaattinen huipentuma tulee toivon mysteeriin. Jos musiikki sulkee todelliset mysteerit, tämä jää hiljaiseksi maailmaksi, josta heidän äänensä ei koskaan nouse.
ellauri345.html on line 520: Analoginen esityshetki on laskeva tähti valinnaisissa affiniteeteissa. Sen lisäksi, että sen eeppinen perusta on myyttinen, sen lyyrinen laajuus intohimossa ja taipumuksissa, sen dramaattinen huipentuma tulee toivon mysteeriin. Jos musiikki sulkee todelliset mysteerit, tämä jää hiljaiseksi maailmaksi, josta heidän äänensä ei koskaan nouse. Mutta kenelle se sopii, ellei tälle, joka lupaa sen enemmän kuin sovinnon: lunastuksen. Tämä on piirretty "kilttiin", jonka George asetti Beethovenin syntymäpaikan päälle Bonnissa: mitä mysteeri varsinaisessa merkityksessä piilee teoksessa. Draaman mysteeri on se hetki, jolloin se projisoi oman kielensä ulottuvuudesta korkeampaan, johon se ei pääse. Sitä ei siksi voi koskaan ilmaista sanoin, vaan vain esityksenä; se on "dramaattinen" suppeimmassa merkityksessä. Analoginen esityshetki on laskeva tähti valinnaisissa affiniteeteissa. Sen lisäksi, että sen eeppinen perusta on myyttinen, sen lyyrinen laajuus intohimossa ja taipumuksissa, sen dramaattinen huipentuma tulee toivon mysteeriin. Jos musiikki sulkee todelliset mysteerit, tämä jää hiljaiseksi maailmaksi, josta heidän äänensä ei koskaan nouse. Mutta kenelle se sopii, ellei tälle, joka lupaa sen enemmän kuin sovinnon: lunastuksen. Tämä on piirretty "kilttiin", jonka George asetti Beethovenin syntymäpaikan päälle Bonnissa.
ellauri346.html on line 49: Why isn't there no agreed definition of terrorism? The international community has found it difficult to agree upon a definition because it has all too often depended upon who the perpetrators are. A simple definition of terrorism involves all of the above EXCEPT: Counterterrorism.
ellauri349.html on line 456: Häh? Eski oli HÄMMÄSTYNYT!?! kun Knupo lanseerasi hokeman "toisto tyylikeinona". Mit vit sehän nimenomaan aina hoki ja yhä hokee samaa ad nauseam. Sixi se on onnen omiaan lavaesiintyjäxi ja kazomoiden Sokrateexi. Sitä ei lainkaan vaivaannuta märehtiä samaa palaa ad infinitum.
ellauri351.html on line 506: Tämä hetki on ihmiskunnan historian saranahetki, josta joko tulemme ulos kaapista uudistuneena tai tarinamme on finito, loppu. Tulemme toki taas löytämään suuntamme ja se suunta johtaa ihmiset keskinäiseen oikeudenmukaisuuteen, mutta emme ilman ponnisteluita, näin otaksun. Oikeudenmukaisuuden saavuttamisen kautta tulemme saavuttamaan kyvyn käydä vuoropuhelua eliöiden kanssa vaikeissakin asioissa. Vuoropuhelun kautta voimme ratkaista vaikeimmatkin ongelmamme. Ja siten askel kerrallaan voimme luoda uuden tulevaisuutemme. Minä näen tulevaisuuden täydellisen positiivisena, vaikka juuri nyt kirveltääkin. Uskon ihmiskunnan kykyyn herätä eliöiden haasteen edessä.
ellauri353.html on line 188: Espanjan sisällissodan alkaessa Buñuel liittyi Espanjan kommunistiseen puolueeseen (PCE) vuonna 1931,  vaikka myöhemmin elämässään hän kielsi ryhtyneensä kommunistiksi. Läppä läppä se sanoi kuin pyhä Pietari. Elokuussa 1936 Nationalistinen miliisi ampui ja tappoi Federico García Lorcan. Afterwards, returning to Spain was impossible since the Fascists had seized power, so Buñuel decided to stay in the U.S. indefinitely, stating that he was "immensely attracted by the American naturalness and sociability". Sekin vielä.
ellauri360.html on line 321: David Foster Wallace : Infinite Jest
ellauri364.html on line 299: Nietzschelle matematiikka oli taiteellista ja moraalista toimintaa, jolla on olennainen rooli homotieteessä. Nietzschen omien kirjoitusten huolellinen lukeminen matemaattisia huolenaiheita ajatellen paljastaa, että hän ei vältä eikä vihaa matematiikkaa. Nietzschen finitismi ja hänen teoriansa ikusesta paluusta ovat selvästi samaa mieltä intuitionististen matematiikan käsitysten kanssa. Lisäksi intuitionismi tukee Nietzschen matematiikan käsittelyä taiteellisena ja moraalisena toimintana.
ellauri365.html on line 536: Heidenstam var dock fortsatt svartsjuk och bevakade om någon visade ett mer än artigt intresse för Greta. Hon blev alltmer olycklig och har vid åtminstone något tillfälle försökt ta livet av sig, det visar bevarade brev. Enligt Gedin (2006) var den desperata Greta otrogen med trädgårdsdrängen Gerhard och detta orsakade den definitiva separationen 1916. För att bli kvitt Greta använde Verner nobelpengarna, som kom just i rättan tid. Med transfersumman kunde Greta håva in en annan författare.
ellauri370.html on line 53: Esther and Mordechai were definitely cousins. There was a big age gap between them, seeing as Mordechai took Esther in after she was orphaned. But according to TheTorah.com, some translations suggest he took her in as his wife, not as his ward. The exact phrase is he "took her to him," which one rabbi in Ask The Rabbi notes is only used when referring to marriage. Then why would Esther have passed for virginal woman if she'd been the wife of someone else? It may have been a matter of her age. It's gross, but it's true. This means it's very possible Mordechai never slept with Esther, well, not often anyway. According to the Jewish Women's Archive, Esther's considered not to have committed adultery because she didn't have a choice in marrying King Xerxes.
ellauri370.html on line 94: It might be well, however, to inquire, What is sin ? What is the biblical definition of it ? We find the answer in the following language: " Whosoever committeth sin trans-gresseth also the law : for sin is the transgression of the law." Gresseth! The Jews did a lot of it. We quote the following from the Prophet Isaiah:
ellauri375.html on line 319: Fair enough! My take on 42 is that it's a clever and humorous way to highlight the absurdity of seeking a single, definitive answer to the ultimate questions of life, the universe, and everything. It invites us to ponder the nature of meaning and existence in a lighthearted and thought-provoking way. I can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
ellauri375.html on line 333: The meaning of life is a big philosophical question that doesn't have a single, definitive answer. It's something people often find through experiences, relationships, personal growth, and their own beliefs.
ellauri377.html on line 312: Strong's 3588: The, the definite article. Including the feminine he, and the neuter to in all their inflections; the definite article; the.
ellauri377.html on line 322: Strong's 3588: The, the definite article. Including the feminine he, and the neuter to in all their inflections; the definite article; the.
ellauri384.html on line 220: The concepts of “Heaven” and “Hell” are not only difficult for any rational person to believe, but they are not even well-defined. Even within the belief system of Christianity, there are multiple descriptions of Heaven and Hell. Some subsets of Christendom don’t believe in hell. Those who read the Bible closely insist that “Hell” is only for traitorous angels. Everybody has a different idea of who is “definitely” going to be sent to one place or another.
ellauri389.html on line 73: The tempest over a teacup that occurs in "Old China" is Lamb's prosaically imperial scramble for the sign of poetic genius that he associates with Coleridge-that is, China. Indeed, as a series, the Elia essays repeatedly portray Chinese commodities as the definitive form of affordable imperial luxury "made in China". They are themselves a superfoetation of the pre-occupation chinoiserie.
ellauri390.html on line 730: Jaa on tässä epilogikin kuin El Zorro vihkosissa. Ei siinä enää mitään ihmeempää. Vikan sivun omakehut jälleen kertovat, että Jakob Pavunvarsi on kaikkien aikojen Vorsokratikereiden Hall Of Famessa sadan parhaan joukossa. Se hämmmästyttää sitä izeäänkin, muita vielä enemmän. Mutta mitä on Big Five for Life? Viisi sukupuuttoon kuolevaa eläinlajia termiittiapinan turistisafarilla. Five goals that you should definitely achieve in life. 100 kirjaa jotka pitää lukea, 1000 paikkaa missä käydä. Vitunko väliä?
xxx/ellauri010.html on line 30: Mazurka por dos muertos. This is definitely my favourite of Cela’s works. It shows a return to a more traditional narrative style, though it is not without its post-modernist elements. The story starts with the tale of the death of Lázaro Codesal, who was killed by a Moroccan when on service in Morocco, while masturbating under a fig tree.

xxx/ellauri010.html on line 618: If you were more vigilant while playing with yourself, I wouldn't write dis message. I don't think that playing with yourself is extremely bad, but when all your friends, relatives, сolleagues receive video record of it- it is definitely news.
xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1106: naisella per definitionem ON setämiesasenneongelma.
xxx/ellauri056.html on line 628: Idealistit pukersivat samaa infinite regress kysymystä kuin antiikkiset liikkumattomasta liikuttajasta. Bertrand Russellin vanha mummu tiesi siihen ratkaisun: Its no use Mr. Russell, its turtles all the way down. Ja sitne koittaa kovasti vetää esiin jotain "toista" omasta napanöyhdästä. Turha vaiva: jos kaikki on vaan mä niin eihän sitä toista edes tarvita. Narsismi ja autismi on erottamattomat kuin kaxi munapussia.
xxx/ellauri057.html on line 915: Ollaan definitiivisesti taas porvarillistuttu.
xxx/ellauri057.html on line 937: En 1952, il est reçu à l’Académie royale de Belgique et il revient définitivement en Europe le 18 mars 1955. Après une période mouvementée sur la Côte d'Azur à côtoyer la jet set, il finit par s’installer en Suisse dans le château d'Echandens en 1957.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 380: In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare is decidedly not anti-Semitic. It is just the opposite. We are definitely attracted to the Christians and we can see how horrific Shylock’s intention is but that is outweighed by the provocation he is subjected to: his social shunning, attempts to exploit him, daily insults about him and his religion, and the dramatic acts of the abduction of his daughter and the stealing of his property.
xxx/ellauri068.html on line 133: Borat visits Luenell and they return to Kazakhstan together. They bring several American customs and traditions back to his village, including the apparent conversion of the people to Christianity (the Kazakh version of which includes crucifixion and torturing of Jews) and the introduction of computer-based technology, such as iPods, laptop computers and a high-definition television.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 462: When asked in an interview in 2002 whether he was gay, Ellis explained that he did not identify as gay or straight but was comfortable being thought of as homosexual, bisexual or heterosexual and enjoyed playing with his persona, identifying variously as gay, straight and bisexual to different people over the years. In a 1999 interview, Ellis suggested that his reluctance to definitively label his sexuality was for "artistic reasons", "if people knew that I was straight, they'd read [my books] in a different way. If they knew I was gay, 'Psycho' would be read as a different book." In an interview with Robert F. Coleman, Ellis said he had an "indeterminate sexuality", that "any other interviewer out there will get a different answer and it just depends on the mood I am in".
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 465: “American Psycho” author Bret Easton Ellis tore into the late author of the critically acclaimed “Infinite Jest” and “The Pale King” on Twitter last week, and in true Ellis fashion, he didn’t hold back.
xxx/ellauri084.html on line 367: Tämä on siis Niels Bohrin ize valizema ja aatelisviikunaansa ize raapustama ja oma latinantama deviisi. (Sitä siteeraa sen kummemmin selittelemättä finitejest.wallacewiki.com/david-foster-wallace/index.php?title=Pages_698-716">Wallu s. 697.. Bohrin ansio verrattuna esim. tyhmään Einsteiniin nähden oli eze vähät välitti siitä ettei aaltopaketille ollut jalkapallon ja kazoja-aallon tapaista tuttua rautalankaesimerkkiä. Se siis vaan istui tyynen rauhallisesti ihan coolina tyhjän päälle kuin sen ihailema Sören Kierkegaard.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 167:

“Psychotic Depression” and Suicide in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest

xxx/ellauri085.html on line 169: This essay offers a close analysis of one particular character in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest: Kate Gompert, a suicidal marijuana addict afflicted with “psychotic depression.”
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 173: “Yevtuschenko” is likely an allusion to Soviet-Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko, who never produced a textbook on clinical psychology. But it's fascinating—throughout Infinite Jest, Wallace and his characters consistently attribute fabricated texts to real people! See, for example, “Gilles Deleuze's posthumous Incest and the Life of Death in Capitalist Entertainment” (792).
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 283: For most of his career, Peterson maintained a clinical practice, seeing about 20 people a week. He has been active on social media, and in September 2016 he released a series of videos in which he criticized Bill C-16 which proposed to add "gender identity or expression" as a prohibited ground of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act, and to similarly expand the definitions of promoting genocide and publicly inciting hatred in the hate speech laws in Canada.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 359: What happens is this.. Give a blue collar worker $2000 and he will buy new furniture, or clothing, ir maybe put a down payment on a new car. He will definitely take his family out to dinner and a movie, therefore stimulating the economy. However, those in charge of the companies will not do this. They already have their purchases, parties, dinners, and vacations planned and payed for. When they get an extra $2000 or $200,000 they keep it. They purchase more stock ir perhaps an insurance policy. Maybe they just stick it into a CD. In any case they are NOT helping the economy or even interested in doing so.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 624: ¹Halin apealla naamalla on näkyvinään riemua s.852 kun Stichin oza jäätyi kiinni ikkunaan. Ei sillä vielä kuuhun mennä, ei se päättymättömältä vaikuta, kun alkaa vasta kalkkiviivoilla. Tuskin se on englannixi jest sitäpaizi. Jotkut sanoo että se infinite jest on se viihdekasetti. Se nyt ainakaan ei ollut kovin riemukas.

xxx/ellauri086.html on line 927: Even the term "Nevermore," he says, is based on logic following the "unity of effect." The sounds in the vowels in particular, he writes, have more meaning than the definition of the word itself. He had previously used words like "Lenore" for the same effect. The raven itself, Poe says, is meant to symbolize Mournful and Never-ending Remembrance. This may imply an autobiographical significance to the poem, alluding to the many people in Poe's life who had died.
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 471: Funny little Jew Primo Levi roughly quotes Marvell in his 1983 poem "The Mouse," which describes the artistic and existential pressures of the awareness that time is finite. He expresses annoyance at the sentiment to seize the day, stating, "And at my back it seems to hear / Some winged curved chariot hurrying near. / What impudence! What conceit! / I really was fed up."
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 478: The poem, along with Marvell's 'The Definition of Love', is heavily referenced throughout the 1997 film The Daytrippers, in which the main character finds a note she believes may be from her husband's mistress. In several scenes, the two Marvell poems are alluded to, quoted, and sometimes directly discussed.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 654:

You definitely need an appetite when you travel in Hungary,

xxx/ellauri103.html on line 203: What strikes me about that definition is that “without permission” bit. However are we fiction writers to seek “permission” to use a character from another race or culture, or to employ the vernacular of a group to which we don’t belong? Do we set up a stand on the corner and approach passers-by with a clipboard, getting signatures that grant limited rights to employ an Indonesian character in Chapter Twelve, the way political volunteers get a candidate on the ballot? Anyway, do you really expect us Americans to seek permission from any of those lower races? Did we do so when we appropriated their land and property?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 266: Worse: the left’s embrace of gotcha hypersensitivity inevitably invites backlash. Donald Trump appeals to people like me who have had it up to their eyeballs with being told what they can and cannot say. Pushing back against a mainstream culture of speak-no-evil suppression, they lash out in defiance, and then what they say is pretty appalling. I actually think President Trump is a real cool guy. Especially I love his hair, it most definitely is not black and curly like that other president's.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 300: Note: We have 58 other definitions for POV in our Acronym Attic, viz.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 216: V. Jane felt that the nurses and assistants of Prof. Hawking were intruding in their family life and Prof. Hawking felt that Jane had stopped loving him and loved Jonathan instead. After taking divorce from Jane in 1995, Hawking married Elaine Mason. Hawking took divorce from Elaine Mason in 2006 because she was physically abusing him. Prof. Hawking again started having a close friendship with Jane. Jane described her experiences with Prof. Hawking in her memoir Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen which was published in 2007.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 291: There are other cases of nations being as totally erased from history and then suddenly reappearing. Israel and Babylon are two obvious examples. But with both of them there are multiple chapters with detailed descriptions of their re-emergence and subsequent destiny. With Elam we get one non-definitive verse.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 632: The Markan word for "my god", Ἐλωΐ, definitely corresponds to the Aramaic form אלהי, elāhī. The Matthean one, Ἠλί, fits in better with the אלי of the original Hebrew Psalm, as has been pointed out in the literature; however, it may also be Aramaic because this form is attested abundantly in Aramaic as well.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 93: Lepakot ovat nisäkkäitä, jotka syövät hyttysiä. Niiden kaikuun johtamat tavat metsästää, saalistavat ja saaliinsa syövät tekevät muista hyönteisistä helppoja kohteita lepakoille. Vaikka lepakot voivat saada monia erilaisia ​​öisiä hyönteisiä, niiden affiniteetti hyttysiin on kiistaton. Äskettäisessä Wisconsinin yliopistossa tehdyssä tutkimuksessa löydettiin hyttystodisteita guanosta (ulosteista) yli 70 prosenttia tutkituista villieläimistä, mikä viittaa siihen, että lepakot syövät luonnollisessa elinympäristössään paljon enemmän hyttysiä kuin aiemmin ajateltiin.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 769: One of the first things Nabokov makes a point of saying is that, despite John Ray Jr.'s claim in the Foreword, there is no moral to the story. Nabokov concludes the afterword with a reference to his beloved first language, which he abandoned as a writer once he moved to the United States in 1940: "My private tragedy, which cannot, and indeed should not, be anybody's concern, is that I had to abandon my natural idiom, my untrammeled, rich, and infinitely docile Russian language for a second-rate brand of English." Alas, that 'wonderful Russian language' which, I imagined, still awaits me somewhere, which blooms like a faithful spring behind the locked gate to which I, after so many years, still possess the key, turned out to be non-existent, and there is nothing beyond that gate, except for some burned out stumps and hopeless autumnal emptiness, and the key in my hand looks rather like a lock pick. Or floppy prick."
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 94: Robotit on ällöjä. Transuhumanistit on yhtä oikeassa kuin oli Karl Marx ja Friedrich Hegel: kehitystä ei voi estää, se menee vääjäämättä sinne mikä per definitionem on eteenpäin. Apinat, niiden kehittämä tekoäly ja robotit on käyt kaz täysin deterministisiä ja periaatteessa ennustettaviakin, kunhan teoria on riittävän monimutkainen. Tosin ainut tapa ennakoida niitä voi olla simulaatio, joka on liian iso apinalle ja hitaampi kuin tapahtumain kulku izessään. En ole tarvinnut sitä hypoteesia, Laplace tokaisi.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 187: The problem with applying this definition to sex robots is that they increasingly provide much more than sex. Sex robots are not just dolls with a microchip. They use self-learning algorithms to engage their partner's emotions.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 516: stressing about that work project you definitely procrastinated.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 600: Agnostique élevé dans le protestantisme, Jacques Maritain se convertit à la foi catholique en 1906 et cette religion a profondément imprégné sa philosophie. Après une phase anti-moderniste, où il était proche de l´Action française, sans y adhérer, il s´en éloigna et finit par accepter la démocratie et la laïcité (Humanisme intégral, 1936). Son œuvre fut liée de près à l´éclosion de la démocratie chrétienne, malgré les réserves de Maritain lui-même à propos de son organisation concrète.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 48: Doch allmählich traten die Differenzen zwischen beiden deutlicher hervor. Ende 1912 führte dies zum Bruch, nachdem Jung sein Buch Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido publiziert hatte. Er kritisierte darin Freuds Libidobegriff, «der von der vorrangigen Bedeutung des Geschlechtstriebes ausging, welche aus der Kindheit des jeweiligen Individuums herrühre», während er der Auffassung war, «dass die Definition erweitert werden, der Libidobegriff ausgedehnt werden müsse, sodass auch universelle Verhaltensmuster, die vielen unterschiedlichen Kulturen in unterschiedlichen geschichtlichen Perioden gemein waren, von ihm erfasst würden». Freud erklärte daraufhin, «dass er die Arbeiten und Ausführungen der Schweizer nicht als legitime Fortsetzung der Psychoanalyse ansehen könne».
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 114: I laughed at the person who claimed that liberals were literate and educated. That’s good, if the definition of “literate” and “educated” is “they read what they want to see” and “learn nonsense.” Say what you will, the Harry Potter universe is fundamentally flawed, and I can see why liberals like it so much:
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 520: There was only one variable that separated the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging and the people who really struggle for it. And that was, the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging believe they're worthy of love and belonging. That's it. These are whole-hearted people, self-satisfied people, living from this deep sense of worthiness. What they had in common was a sense of courage. Courage, the original definition of courage, when it first came into the English language -- it's from the Latin word "cor," meaning "heart" -- and the original definition was to be who you are with your whole heart (sydän taas, hui, yäk). And so these folks had, very simply, the courage to be imperfect.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 325: Those perfumes, those infinite kisses and sighs,
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 329: Oh, perfumes! oh, infinite kisses and sighs!
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 365: but — vows and fragrance, infinite desire —
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 369: o vows! o fragrance! infinite desire!
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 485: Those vows, those perfumes, those infinite kisses,
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 489: — O vows! O perfumes! O infinite kisses!
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 526: Shall they be born again out of infinity?
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 575: Two editions of Fleurs du mal were published in Baudelaire's lifetime — one in 1857 and an expanded edition in 1861. "Scraps" and censored poems were collected in Les Épaves in 1866. After Baudelaire died the following year, a "definitive" edition appeared in 1868.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 792:
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 222: (4) Ippolit tries to figure out the point of living for two weeks. On the one hand, why not just die now and get it over with? But on the other hand, he feels like it's actually only now that he has a death sentence of sorts that he has really started to live. (Which, okay, guys, remember the story Myshkin told about the condensed man and how full of life his last few hours must be? There is definitely more to the idea that the person who knows he is about to die lives a very full life at the end—as Dostoevsky himself experience at his staged execution.)
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 177: The sages said that the only difference between this world and the days of the Messiah will be with regard to the enslavement to the kingdoms. It appears from the plain meaning of the words of the prophets that at the beginning of the days of the Messiah, there will be the war of Gog and Magog. And that prior to the war of Gog and Magog, a prophet will arise to straighten Israel and prepare their hearts, as it is written, Behold, I will send to you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord (Mal. 4:5) And he will come not to declare the pure impure, or the impure pure; not to declare unfit those who are presumed to be fit, nor to declare fit those who are held to be unfit; but for the sake of peace in the world….And there are those among the sages who say that prior to the coming of the Messiah will come Elijah. But all these things and their likes, no man can know how they will be until they will be. For they are indistinct in the writings of the prophets. Neither do the sages have a tradition about these things. It is rather, a matter of interpretation of the Biblical verses. Therefore there is a disagreement among them regarding these matters. And in any case, these are mere details which are not of the essence of the faith. And one should definitely not occupy oneself with the matter of legends, and should not expatiate about the midrashim that deal with these and similar things. And one should not make essentials out of them. For they lead neither to fear nor to love [of God]. Neither should one calculate the End. The sages said, “May the spirit of those who calculate the End be blown away” But let him wait and believe in the matter generally, as we have explained.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 470: According to the Quebecois, "PHYLOTHERAPY", the term is no longer appropriate today because of the definition of the word "therapy" itself. The latter implies means "to cure or relieve illnesses". However, philosophical consultation does not aim at such an such an objective. Moreover, in some countries, the use of the term "THERAPY" is regulated and often reserved for the medical field. Finally, the term "PHILOTHERAPY" was initially used to draw attention to the fact that attention to the fact that philosophers were now offering consultations and opening specialized practices for this purpose specialized practices open to all. It was a good marketing move since the term has the attention of the media and the public. Today, the term "PHILOTHERAPY"has been abandoned in favor of "PHILOSOPHY CONSULTATION" offered by "PHILOSOPHES CONULTANTS". "CONULTANT" has even more traction now.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 403: Thus goes the logic in a lot of comedy shows and a few adult cartoons. Sadly, that's not the case. The line separating The Three Stooges-style painful fun from outright villainous squicky sadism varies from person to person but is definitely there; crossing it makes one fan's "Nyuk nyuk!" another fan's Guilty Pleasures.
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 347: Could there possibly be a connection between Scholem’s own confession of moral confusion and his treatment of Frank. Did he see something of himself in Frank, who was accused of various sexual perversions, and recoil in horror? While there can be no definitive answer to this question, considering Scholem’s emotional life from the years in which he was writing this pathbreaking essay creates the possibility of a new reading.
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 299:

This Hamilton was definitely not a saint nor a virgin.

xxx/ellauri165.html on line 588: With mention of the donkey, I have to add this. In a recent online discussion on the historicity of the Bible, one person commented “we can be assured of one thing, Balaam’s Donkey definitely did exist and did speak. The only thing we have to further ascertain is… did he sound like Eddie Murphy?”
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 229: He laughs at the defiant ones, for between them and Him there is an infinite distance; He derides them by allowing the boundless stupidity of the infinitely little one to come to a climax and then He thrusts him down to the earth undeceived.
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 530: Wishaupt seems to be an enthusiastic Philanthropist. He is among those (as you know the excellent Price and Priestley also are) who believe in the indefinite perfectibility of man. He thinks he may in time be rendered so perfect that he will be able to govern himself in every circumstance so as to injure none, to do all the good he can, to leave government no occasion to exercise their powers over him, & of course to render political government useless. This you know is Godwin’s doctrine, and this is what Robinson, Barruel & Morse had called a conspiracy against all government.
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 614: Shea provided in 1983 a brief introduction for the Illuminati Expansion Set rule book. "Maybe," he wrote, "the Illuminati are behind this game. They must be. They are, by definition, behind everything."
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 74: Since then, the phrase "new world order" was used to herald in the post-Cold War era without substantive definition.
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 719: The universe is both infinite and eternal?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 1003: Indtil der findes håndfaste forklaringer på universets og livets oprindelse og udvikling, vil konflikten mellem naturvidenskaben og intelligent design-teorien formentlig vare ved. Og sandsynligvis længere tid endnu, for naturvidenskaben kan per definition aldrig bevise, at der ikke eksisterer en skaber, siger Tobias Wang.
xxx/ellauri174.html on line 67: Aivan kuten kaikki ihmisen toiminta (yhdessä minkä tahansa muun olennon toiminnan kanssa) on täysin riippuvainen Jumalasta, niin myös kaikki ihmisen tietämys. Tai siltä ainakin tuntui Malebranchesta. Ja että ihmisten tieto on riippuvainen jumalallisesta ymmärryksestä tavalla, joka on analoginen tapa, jossa ruumiiden liike on riippuvainen jumalallisesta tahdosta. Kuten René Descartes, Malebranche katsoi, että ihmiset saavuttavat tiedon ideoiden kautta – mielen aineettomien esitysten kautta. Mutta kun Descartes uskoi, että ideat ovat mentaalisia kokonaisuuksia, Malebranche väitti, että kaikki ideat ovat olemassa vain Jumalassa. Nämä ideat ovat siksi luomattomia ja riippumattomia finiteistä mielistä. Kun pääsemme käsiksi niihin älyllisesti, ymmärrämme objektiivisen totuuden. Malebranche määritteli "totuuden" ideoiden väliseksi suhteeksi: koska nämä ideat ovat Jumalassa, ne ovat ikuisia ja muuttumattomia, ja näin ollen ainoat nimen arvoiset totuudet ovat itse ikuisia ja muuttumattomia. Malebranche jakoi nämä ideoiden väliset suhteet kahteen luokkaan: suuruussuhteisiin ja laatusuhteisiin tai täydellisyyteen. Ensimmäiset muodostavat "spekulatiivisia" totuuksia, kuten geometrian totuuksia, kun taas jälkimmäiset muodostavat "käytännön" etiikan totuuksia. Eettiset periaatteet ovat Malebranchelle siksi jumalallisia perustaltaan, yleismaailmallisia sovelluksissaan, ja ne on löydettävä älyllisen mietiskelyn avulla, aivan kuten geometriset periaatteet ovat.
xxx/ellauri175.html on line 527: Tämä elävä eetteri on rajaton ja vapaa alue, jossa etuoikeutettu matkustaja niin kauan kuin hän viipyy, haluaa heijastaa itsensä ajallisen olemuksensa läheisyyteen sen olennon odotetun ja edelläkävijän varjon, joka "Hänestä tulee". Siten syntyy affiniteetti hänen sielunsa ja näiden aistien kanssa vierekkäisten okkultististen universumien, jotka ovat hänelle vielä tulevia, välille; ja suhdepolku, jossa tämän kaksoismaailman välinen virta toteutuu, ei ole mikään muu kuin se Hengen alue, jota Järki – riemuitsee ja nauraa raskaissa kahleissaan voitollisen tunnin ajan – kutsuu tyhjällä halveksunnalla mielikuvitukseksi. .
xxx/ellauri175.html on line 790: Jos hysteerisen yliherkkyyden tilassa indusoiva affiniteetti voi siten yhdistää potilaan elimistön näiden aineiden intiimeihin ominaisuuksiin ja houkutella niiden elävää vaikutusta lasin ja pergamentin huokosten läpi - kuten magneetti tekee vaikutuksen, lasin ja kankaiden läpi, rautaa, ― jos on vihdoin kiistatonta, että jonkinlainen hämärä magnetismi lähtee ulos jopa kasvi- ja mineraaliaineista ja voi ylittää ― ilman induktoreita, ― esteitä ja etäisyyksiä niin, että saan vaikutuksen elävään olentoon erityisellä hyvellään, kuinka voisin ihmetteletkö suunnattomasti, että kolmen samantyyppisen lajin yksilön välillä, jotka on asetettu toisiinsa yhteisen sähkömagnetoidun keskuksen avulla, nesteet ovat tietyllä hetkellä korrelatiivisia siinä määrin, että kyseinen ilmiö on tapahtunut?
xxx/ellauri176.html on line 186: Vous aurez donc compris que La Faute de l’abbé Mouret est un Zola un peu atypique qui respecte moins le schéma habituel des autres (enfin sauf que ça finit mal). Zola a un peu tendance à perdre son lecteur dans la forêt du Paradou et au milieu des atermoiements de Serge Mouret. Il s’agit donc d’un Zola que je déconseille en première instance (voire même en seconde). Les téméraires pourront néanmoins profiter de descriptions paradisiaques à foison, d’une fin tragi-comique et d’un propos qui reste très intéressant.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 713: Within the Quran, Jesus’ miraculous virgin birth is recounted with Mary having astonishment. How could she become pregnant when no mortal man has touched her? The angel she is having a criminal conversation with discourages her incredulousness with an affirmation of the power and might of Allah’s definitive decree. The virgin birth lacks the majesty of the Christian doctrine because it is not an announcement of God coming into her. Jesus would be like others before him, a prophet who announces God’s truth. The angel goes on to describe just what Jesus would do. Within the description, the author narrates an account of a miracle that Jesus performed as “clear proof” that he was a prophet of Allah. The miracle is repeated later in Surah 5.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 797: nature. For it to contain any sort of error would impugn the nature of an errorless God (39:1-2; 55:1-2). A further question would be whether or not something that never happened in the passing of time can be viewed by definition “historical?”How about "epic?" This could be an example of a pseudo-book. Responses and others similar to them make the objection implausible.
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 121: Freedman's Rilke, oddly enough, dwells on the dark underside of contemporary American life. Behind the mingled, multicolored yarn of his passions, obsessions, powerful yearnings, and self-interest--all wisely balanced in Donald Prater's majestic and definitive 1986 biography--Freedman sees only self-interest. Rilke is "hucksterish." His carefully cultivated literary success Freedman characterizes as a "relentless career." He refers to Rilke's "careerist standards." The places Rilke settles in for a time are not homes but Rilke's "bases."
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 151: As for the centerpiece of Freedman's argument for Rilke's sexism--he "abandoned" Clara and their daughter, Ruth--here he portrays Clara, too, as if she were Tess of the D'Urbervilles. On the contrary. Clara enthusiastically seconded Rilke's definition of two artists wedded as each, in Rilke's cautiously ambiguous phrase, "the guardian of the other's solitude." After Rilke left for Paris, she placed Ruth with her wealthy and supportive parents and went on a pilgrimage to Egypt, among other places. Like Rilke, the adventurous Clara had a fascinating life--I don't know why Freedman didn't write her biography. Women artists suffered in Rilke's society, but not because of Rilke.
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 378: Groddeck eventually had acrimonious disagreement with Freud about the definition and declension of the It/Id/das Es. Groddeck regarded the ego as an extension or a mask for the id, whereas Freud regarded them as separate constructs.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 615: Views from a Tuft Of Grass—a little twee, but also charming. Definitely no other book has been called this. Let’s say seven.
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1061: Writing in The Guardian, the political journalist Gaby Hinsliff described Strange Death as "gentrified xenophobia" and "Chapter after chapter circles around the same repetitive themes: migrants raping and murdering and terrorising; paeans to Christianity; long polemics about how Europe is too ´exhausted by history´ and colonial guilt to face another battle, and is thus letting itself be rolled over by invaders fiercely confident in their own beliefs", while also pointing out that Murray offers little definition of the European culture he claims is under threat. Pankaj Mishra´s review in The New York Times described the book as "a handy digest of far-right clichés". In The Intercept, Murtaza Hussain criticized the "relentlessly paranoid tenor" of Murray´s work and said that its claims of mass crime perpetuated by immigrants were "blinkered to the point of being propaganda", while noting the book´s appeal to the far right. In Middle East Eye, Georgetown professor Ian Almond called the book "a staggeringly one-sided flow of statistics, interviews and examples, reflecting a clear decision to make the book a rhetorical claim that Europe is doomed to self-destruction".
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 180: In awarding Naipaul the 2001 Nobel Prize in Literature, the Swedish Academy praised his work "for having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories." Kukahan tonkin runoili, olikohan kulturpersonligheten. The Committee added: "Naipaul is a modern philosopher carrying on the tradition that started originally with Lettres persanes and Candide. In a vigilant style, which has been deservedly admired, he transforms rage into precision and allows events to speak with their own inherent irony." The Committee also noted Naipaul's affinity with the novelist Joseph Conrad (toinen kaappikolonialisti pyllypää):
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 225: Il vit au milieu des livres, la cité des livres, mais se lance à la recherche, en Sicile et à Paris, du précieux manuscrit de La Légende dorée qu’il finit un jour par obtenir. Le hasard lui fait rencontrer la petite fille d’une femme qu’il a jadis aimée et, pour "protéger" l’enfant d’un autre tuteur abusif, il l’enlève. Après plusieurs années de bon usage par Sylvestre, la jeune fille épousera un élève de M. Bonnard. Tollanen pedofiilinen Goethen Mignon taas.
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 361: But in Nazi Germany, the leaders came up with their own anti-Semitic definition of a Vierteljude, or “Quarter Jew.” And this was someone who simply had one Jewish grandparent. So according to Hitler’s own rules, he would indeed be considered a quarter Jewish — if Frank’s claim was true.
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 377:

The Definitive Alternative Truth About Hitler’s Heritage

xxx/ellauri202.html on line 396: In short, it appears that there is no definitive evidence that Adolf Hitler was Jewish. But considering his disturbing legacy, it’s easy to see how such a conspiracy theory could fester over the decades.
xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1031: Modern scholars, however, do not concur with this identification because they argue that it lacks definitive proof.
xxx/ellauri218.html on line 351: By the traditional definition of Judaism, everyone who has a Jewish mother is automatically Jewish. Which is all fine and well.But should the traditional definition apply in the case of Bobby Fischer? Once a brilliant chess champion, a transcendent genius, he descended into lunacy, claiming the Holocaust never happened, vindicating September 11 attacks, and denouncing his Jewish roots, even writing to the Encyclopedia Judaica asking for his name to be taken out.
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 149: After Jay Wurstin dies prematurely, he is buried in the cemetery plot originally reserved for Amy’s father, who had sold it to him years earlier. Now Amy wants to remove Jay’s body to the burial plot of his own family so that her father, who is still alive at an advanced age, can eventually be buried there, mikä on hyvin juutalainen juttu. In a limousine provided by Adletsky, Amy and Trellman disinter and rebury the body. Moved by this scene of cell death and urban renewal, Trellman confesses to Amy that he has always loved her, that he has what he terms an “actual affinity” for her (hence the title of the story). He then asks her to marry him. Teinityttönä Amy oli ollut hoikka hempeä olento. Nyt hiän oli vankka kuin tiilestä tehty paskahuusi. Hänen ainoa aarteensa oli tää Salen tolvana. Veistäisin paremman miehen puupalikasta. Samaa voisin sanoa eräistä Helmin poikaystävistä, mutten sano, koska Seija on kieltänyt. Tyydyn veistämään puupalikasta naishahmoja.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 325: Of course, Le Guin was writing daring stories decades before me, stories of women who loved women, of four-person marriages, of people without gender. Her stories offered possibilities that most of society hadn’t even imagined in the late 1960s; I knew she must have faced similar societal disapproval. So I wanted to know why she faded to black for her sex scenes. “There Arrad took me into his arms and I took Arrad into my arms, and then between my legs, and fell upward, upward through the golden light.” (“Coming of Age in Karhide”) There was plenty of sex in her books – sometimes tremendously important sex — but Le Guin didn’t dwell on the details. In fact her sex scenes were prudish and infinitely boring.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 108: Att beskriva SD som fascistiskt blockerar en analys av partiet som politiskt fenomen. Statsminister Stefan Löfven har gett Henrik Arnstads tolkning av Sverigedemokraterna som ett fascistiskt parti ett slags officiell sanktion. Men Arnstads idealtypiska definition av fascism saknar analytisk skärpa och hans empiriska underlag är minst sagt bräckligt.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 110: Redan vid mitten av 1920-talet fanns en flora av teorier om hur detta nya politiska fenomen (dvs fascisterna, inte ännu sverigedemokraterna vid det skedet) skulle förklaras. Tidigt ute var Komintern (den kommunistiska internationalen), som beskrev fascismen som en generell tendens i den europeiska politiken efter första världskrigets slut. Den kommunistiska definitionen var ett kampbegrepp avsett att ge strategisk vägledning i den antifascistiska kampen. Begreppet tenderade att bli liktydigt med alla krafter som stod emot kommunismen. Efter andra världskriget har fascismbegreppet främst blivit en brännmärkande beteckning på företeelser som ifrågasätter rådande liberala konsensus.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 127: I större historiska arbeten som exempelvis Noltes bok och Stanley Paynes A History of Fascism 1919-1945 (1995) finns uppräkningar av element som måste ingå i en minimidefinition av fascism. Nolte nämner antimarxism, antiliberalism, antikonservatism, ledarskapsprincipen, paramilitär organisation och totalitarism. Payne lyfter fram inte mindre än tjugo faktorer som förutsättning för en framgångsrik fascistisk rörelse.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 129: Som motsats hör på britten Griffins definitionsförsök. Han hävdar i sin bok The Nature of Fascism (1991) att fascismen var en särskild ideologi vars ”mytiska kärna” var ”en nyfödd form av populistisk ultranationalism”. Amerikanske Payne från Texas ger det ett hånskratt.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 133: Payne menar att Griffins definition saknar centrala element som måste ingå i en fascismdefinition, exempelvis våldsanvändningen och den paramilitära organisationsformen. Griffins definition av fascismen är närmast godmodig, ja oförarglig. Den är heller inte konsensuell i vetenskapen. Det är bara något han påstår. Att han tas upp i detta sammanhang beror på att han i Sverige fått en särskilt aktualitet genom sin lärjunge Henrik Arnstad, som under hänvisning till Griffin hävdat att Sverigedemokraterna är ett fascistiskt parti. Genom att statsminister Stefan Löfven i ett pressat ögonblick påstod att Sverigedemokraterna var ett fascistiskt parti och hänvisade till Arnstad, har denna tolkning fått ett slags officiell sanktion. Fascismen i Sverige som under mellankrigstiden inte lyckades komma över 1 procent-nivån i valet 1936 skulle nu samla nära 13 procent av den svenska valmanskåren? Well NSDAP got 1/3 of the vote on 1932. In 1933 they got 9/10, being the only option left.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 141: Arnstad hävdar att den definition, som han gör av dagens ultranationalistiska rörelser, är ”politisk-ideologisk – inte moralisk”. Detta är vilseledande. När Arnstad går ut i pressen och förklarar att Sverigedemokraterna är ett fascistiskt parti är det ofrånkomligt att detta får en moralisk innebörd: Sverigedemokraterna framstår som en inkarnation av ondskan, inte som ett parti som drömmer oförargliga nostalgiska drömmar om ett svunnet Sverige à la Griffin.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 147: Det är betecknande att Nolte inte nämner rasismen i sin minimidefinition. Den borde vara innesluten, den är ju kännetecknande för vår svenska varietet.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 149: De rörelser som gick under namn av fascism var alltför olika för att sammanfattas i ett begrepp. Den tyske historikern Wolfgang Wipperman har gjort ett försök till tredelning av begreppet. Han talar om den italienska ”normalfascismen”, den tyska ”radikalfascismen” och slutligen den östeuropeiska fascismen. En sådan realtypisk tredelning av fascismbegreppet har en empirisk konkretion och ger en bättre utgångspunkt för forskningen än Griffins tandlösa definition.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 151: Den tyske historikern Wolfgang Wipperman har gjort ett försök till tredelning av begreppet. Han talar om den italienska ”normalfascismen”, den tyska ”radikalfascismen” och slutligen den östeuropeiska fascismen. En sådan realtypisk tredelning av fascismbegreppet har en empirisk konkretion och ger en bättre utgångspunkt för forskningen än Griffins tandlösa definition.
xxx/ellauri234.html on line 517: But I have the resources and money to pay for it so that's definitely a big plus.
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 812: En las noches como ésta la tuve entre mis brazos. La besé tantas veces bajo el cielo infinito.
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 941: Las necesidades han de ir cubriéndose para poder aspirar al nivel superior. Por ejemplo, si no tenemos las necesidades fisiológicas cubiertas no podemos aspirar a las necesidades de afiliación. En el nivel superior se encuentran las necesidades de autorrealización. Es esta jerarquía la que según Maslow marcaba el modo en el que la personalidad se adapta a las circunstancias, dependiendo de cada situación vivida. Se trata, en definitiva, de una concepción de la personalidad que abarca aspectos psicológicos muy extensos y que va más allá del enfoque psicométrico que dominaba en su época.
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 987: El desarrollo personal (autoengaño con la lucrativa ayuda de un psicólogo) es el motor vital de las personas altamente funcionales. Se vive como un proceso de cambio constante, en el que nunca se alcanza una meta final definitiva sino que se va pasando de una etapa a otra.
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1155: ⁠A tumult of infinite griefs;
xxx/ellauri296.html on line 647: Ein gewisser E. B. Tylor sieht keinen Unterschied zwischen beider Denkprozesse, nur das Material, auf welches sich das Denken bezieht, ist beim Wissenschaftler und beim „Wilden“ oder „Primitiven“, wie Tylor ihn nennt, unterschiedlicher Natur. Um auch den „primitiven“ Menschen verstehen zu können, müsse man lediglich eine Definition von Religion geben, die so allgemein gehalten ist, dass sie gleichzeitig für das Christentum, wie für eine mystische oder Naturreligion gelten kann.
xxx/ellauri296.html on line 674: Silvia jätti sitten Altertumswissenschaftin ja päätyi toimittajaxi Frankfurter Rundschauhun. Kritische, kompetente und prägnante Berichterstattung über soziale, politische, wirtschaftliche Themen; nach 16 Jahren in der Branche Kennerin der Medienlandschaft und ihrer Entwicklung sowie der Arbeitsweise in den Redaktionen; Einblicke in politische Zusammenhänge und in die Wirkung von Machtstrukturen in Entscheidungsprozessen; Affinität zu Wirtschafts- und Verbraucherthemen. Positiv, kommunikativ, wertschätzend; diplomatisch, strategisch, effizient.
xxx/ellauri305.html on line 237: finite.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DOAX3Scarlet.jpg" height="200px" />
xxx/ellauri306.html on line 147: Selfishness Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

xxx/ellauri312.html on line 205: Teoria on seuraava: Infinite Jest on Wallacen yritys ilmentää ja dramatisoida vallankumouksellista fiktiota, jota hän vaati esseessään "E Unibus Pluram: Television and US Fiction". (Vittu et toi Sikiökin oli sivistymätön: "Unibus"? "pluram"? HAHAHA. Jätkä ei osaa latinasta edes alkeita. Koitin lukea Sikiön ao. prujua mutta se oli loputtoman pitkästyttävä.) Tyyli on sellainen, jossa uusi vilpittömyys kumoaa ironisen ironisuuden, joka on 1900-luvun loppua kohden kovertanut nykyisen fiktion. Wallace yritti kirjoittaa vastalääkettä kyynisyydelle, joka oli valloittanut ja surullittanut niin paljon amerikkalaista kulttuuria hänen elinaikanaan. Hän yritti luoda viihdettä, joka saisi meidät puhumaan isänmaallista potaskaa uudelleen. On jo aika unohtaa Vietnamin turpiinotto, sitäpaizi rättipäistä saa helpommin mureketta, kun niillä ei ole niitä viidakoita missä kykkiä. Lisäksi lukuisia kirjailijoita on kuvattu New Sincerity -liikkeen myötävaikuttajiksi, mukaan lukien Jonathan Franzen, Zadie Smith, Dave Eggers (n.h.), Stephen Graham Jones (n.h.), ja Michael Chabon (n.h.). Ei kun suuri narratiivi takas kunniaan!
xxx/ellauri312.html on line 554: As it turns out, all of these definitions are right! Or at least, partly right!
xxx/ellauri320.html on line 197: In her role as wily self-publicist, she once wrote (of Mountbatten's kiss on her cheek): 'A streak of fire ran through me as if I had been struck by lightning. It was a definitely painful but ecstatic sensation. From a woman's point of view, the power was devastating.'
xxx/ellauri337.html on line 252: Ernst Cassirer (Jude) und Martin Heidegger (Nazi) stellen fest, dass Scheler kein neuer Entwurf philosophischer Anthropologie gelungen sei. Max sei bipolar gewesen. "Der Mensch ist ein so breites, buntes, mannigfaltiges Ding, dass die Definitionen alle ein wenig zu kurz geraten. Er hat zu viele Enden (2).“
xxx/ellauri376.html on line 276: Vers 1840-1842, Mauprat est considéré comme une lecture pernicieuse par l'Église catholique et mis à l'Index. En adoptant une position socialiste, notamment grâce aux personnages d'Edmée et de Patience, Sand reflète des idées politiques inspirées par son ami Pierre Leroux, l'inventeur du terme socialisme, qui a également été le formateur — ou du moins contributeur — de son esprit politique. Bernard prend part en la guerre de l'independence des États-Unis et finit par foûtre chère Edmonde.
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 356: The whole world is laughing at Ukraine’s failed counteroffensive, which captured nothing more than a couple patches of trees and trenches? How did the Russians, armed with shovels, defeat the “brave” Ukrainian Nazis armed with NATO weapons? No dear. It is definitely not. The “whole world” does not laugh at an invaded sovereign nazion that for over two years and against all odds has made a mockery out of the supposed "second best" army in the world. Don't pretend you’re aligned with the rest of the world. You are not! There is no "rest of the world" in fact!
432