Marise-älä marise, ja Pyllistä-älä pyllistä. Siinä kaikki. Jotta jumalan tiimi voittaisi, sen pitää ensin marista ja sit pyllistää. Nain on meidankin elamassamme! Marise mitä mariset, mut muista pyllistää!
ellauri153.html on line 363: relates to the Neimanian definition of evil in Ch. 2.2: evil is something that cannot be fit into our
ellauri153.html on line 364: schemes of pursuing the good or making sense of it.1067 Neiman’s definition has two readings:
ellauri153.html on line 370: There are significant differences between the two meanings. The first definition is sufficient to
ellauri153.html on line 386: meaning. Wright’s definition of evil as an anti-good, anti-God and anti-creation force also captures
ellauri153.html on line 432: Proof: “God is good”: By definition, God wins iff Leviathan loses, no evils are left and Job is happy.
ellauri153.html on line 537: definition that defines anti-theodicy as a rejection of theodicies and consistency proofs. I take the
ellauri153.html on line 538: first approach as a matter of definition, but I also argue that rejections of theodicies and consistency
ellauri153.html on line 813: Many ancient customs are strange to modern readers of the Bible, especially those of us who have never lived in cultures embracing polygamy or absolute monarchy. The incident of Abishag sleeping—chastely—in David’s bed is definitely a puzzling story. We’ll start with the Scripture passage in which Abishag is brought to David:
ellauri153.html on line 869: Our knowing consciousness is divisible solely into subject and object. To be object for the subject and to be our representation or mental picture are one and the same. All our representations are objects for the subject, and all objects of the subject are our representations. These stand to one another in a regulated connection which in form is determinable a priori, and by virtue of this connection nothing existing by itself and independent, nothing single and detached, can become an object for us. The first aspect of this principle is that of becoming, where it appears as the law of causality and is applicable only to changes. Thus if the cause is given, the effect must of necessity follow. The second aspect deals with concepts or abstract representations, which are themselves drawn from representations of intuitive perception, and here the principle of sufficient reason states that, if certain premises are given, the conclusion must follow. The third aspect of the principle is concerned with being in space and time, and shows that the existence of one relation inevitably implies the other, thus that the equality of the angles of a triangle necessarily implies the equality of its sides and vice versa. Finally, the fourth aspect deals with actions, and the principle appears as the law of motivation, which states that a definite course of action inevitably ensues on a given character and motive.
ellauri155.html on line 756: Calvin then offers Scriptural support for this definition by tracing the development of this doctrine through the increasing revelation of the Bible in the following steps:
ellauri155.html on line 876: One can see in this paper an application of some ideas of a Humean character to a domain to which Hume himself was not inclined to apply them. There is also a suggestive affinity with Kant’s attempt to dissolve the problem of free will in the Critique of Pure Reason.
ellauri155.html on line 888: Santayana is mostly known for aphorisms, such as "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it", "Only the dead have seen the end of war", and the definition of beauty as "pleasure objectified". Although an atheist, he treasured the Spanish Catholic values, practices, and worldview in which he was raised.] Santayana was a broad-ranging cultural critic spanning many disciplines. He was profoundly influenced by Spinoza´s life and thought; and, in many respects, was another Spinoza. Was he too a jew? I guess not. His father was a minor intellectual. His mother married a Bostonian merchant Sturgis who died. In Madrid, he married the Santayana guy. In 1869, Josefina Borrás de Santayana returned to Boston with her three Sturgis children, because she had promised her first husband to raise the children in the US. She left the six-year-old Jorge with his father in Spain. Jorge and his father followed her to Boston in 1872. His father, finding neither Boston nor his wife´s attitude to his liking, soon returned alone to Ávila, and remained there the rest of his life as a minor intellectual.
ellauri156.html on line 739: The lawyer was in trouble; the story had no technicalities over which to argue. It brought the issue home, with little ground for quibbling over details. When push came to shove, the lawyer knew our Lord's functional definition of “neighbor” was absolutely right. He had nowhere to hide. The story did the trick; it cut to the heart of the matter, while avoiding trivial details to quibble over for hours. It was not the lawyer who made Jesus look bad with all his minutiae but Jesus who made the lawyer look bad with a simple story. The best part about similes that they can be tweaked any way you wish. Russians are our neighbors if they get to trouble, and so are Chinamen. But there is nothing here about helping them when they threaten our vital interests.
ellauri156.html on line 820: (3) God is under no obligation to stop us from sinning. (So why did he bother with David then? Is he some sort of special case? Of course he is, he is Dawgs petlamb. Sometimes people justify their sin by saying something like: “I've prayed about it and asked God to stop me if it is wrong. . . .” When God does not stop them, they somehow assume it must be right. God could have stopped David after he chose to stay home from the war, or after he began to covet Uriah's wife, or after he committed adultery, but instead He allowed David to persist in his sin for some time. God even allowed David to get away with murder, for a time. Well actually, for good. It was just a immigrant after all. God's Word forbade David's sins of coveting, adultery, and murder. God's Word commanded David to stop, and he did not. God allowed David to persist in his sin for a season, but not indefinitely. God allowed David's sin to go full circle, to reach full bloom, so that he (and we) could see how sin grows (compare Genesis 15:12-16).
ellauri158.html on line 48: For every finite cause of the desk, there will always be a temporally prior finite cause of that cause. And a prior cause of the cause of that cause. And so on, ad infinitum.
ellauri158.html on line 63: propositionum, definitionum et al. qui in e t h i c e continentur,
ellauri158.html on line 76: P.1. defin. 2. Ea res dicitur in suo genere finita, quae alia eiusdem naturae terminari potest. [in: P. 1. prop. 8., prop. 21., etiam in: Ep. 4. §. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 95: P.1. defin. 6. Per Deum intelligo ens absolute infinitum, hoc est, substantiam constantem infinitis attributis, quorum unumquodque aeternam et infinitam essentiam exprimit. [in: P. 1. prop. 10. schol., prop. 11., prop. 14., prop. 14. coroll. 1., prop. 16., prop. 19., prop. 23., prop. 31., P. 2. prop. 1., prop. 1. schol., prop. 45., P. 4. prop. 28., P. 5. prop. 35., etiam in: Ep. 3. §. 1., Ep. 4. §. 2., Ep. 26. §. 8., Ep. 64. §. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 106: P.1. defin. 8. Per aeternitatem intelligo ipsam existentiam, quatenus ex sola rei aeternae definitione necessario sequi concipitur. [in: P. 1. prop. 19., prop. 20., prop. 23., P. 5. prop. 29., prop. 30.]
ellauri158.html on line 178: P. 1. prop. 8. Omnis substantia est necessario infinita. [in: P. 1. prop. 12., prop. 13. schol., prop. 15. schol., P. 2. lem. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 193: P. 1. prop. 11. Deus sive substantia constans infinitis attributis, quorum unumquodque aeternam et infinitam essentiam exprimit, necessario existit. [in: P. 1. prop. 13., prop. 14., prop. 17. coroll. 2., prop. 19., prop. 19. schol., prop. 21., prop. 29., prop. 33., prop. 34., P. 5. prop. 35.]
ellauri158.html on line 196: Jumala on välttämätön, per definitionem. Siitä eetikot ei voi olla kuin yhtä mieltä. Mitä liikenteestä tulee ilman poliisia, pesästä ilman hormoonijohtajatarta. Joisaalla Pentiltä lipsahtaa "deus sive natura", mikä on hyvin, hyvin paha. Infamous, sanoo kristityt, ja juutalaiset komppaavat.
ellauri158.html on line 203: P. 1. prop. 13. Substantia absolute infinita est indivisibilis.
ellauri158.html on line 207: Outoa, vois luulla että ääretön olis kaikista jaollisin, kun siinä on sen izensä kokoisia osia? Mut voi tää olla jotain laajuus-syvyyssuuntasekoilua, välillä puhutaan ekstensioista, välillä intensioista. Infinitum voi tarkoittaa myös epämääräistä. Epämääräisessä ei ole muita kuin rändömejä lusikalla piirrettyjä luokkarajoja. Nojaa, ehkä tätä ei tarvita juuri mihinkään.
ellauri158.html on line 220: P. 1. prop. 16. Ex necessitate divinae naturae infinita infinitis modis (hoc est, omnia, quae sub intellectum infinitum cadere possunt) sequi debent. [in: P. 1. prop. 17., prop. 17. schol., prop. 25. schol., prop. 26., prop. 29., prop. 33., prop. 34., prop. 36., app., P. 2. praef., prop. 3., prop. 3. schol., prop. 44. coroll. 2., prop. 45. schol., P. 4. praef., prop. 4., P. 5. prop. 22.]
ellauri158.html on line 221: -- P. 1. prop. 16. coroll. 1. Hinc sequitur, Deum omnium rerum, quae sub intellectum infinitum cadere possunt, esse causam efficientem. [in: P. 1. prop. 17. schol., prop. 18., prop. 34.]
ellauri158.html on line 252: P. 1. prop. 21. Omnia, quae ex absoluta natura alicuius attributi Dei sequuntur, semper et infinita existere debuerunt, sive per idem attributum aeterna et infinita sunt. [in: P. 1. prop. 22., prop. 23., prop. 28., prop. 29., app., P. 2. prop. 11., prop. 30., P. 4. prop. 4., P. 5. prop. 40. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 256: P. 1. prop. 22. Quicquid ex aliquo Dei attributo, quatenus modificatum est tali modificatione, quae et necessario et infinita per idem existit, sequitur, debet quoque et necessario et infinitum existere. [in: P. 1. prop. 23., prop. 28., app., P. 2. prop. 11.]
ellauri158.html on line 260: P. 1. prop. 23. Omnis modus, qui et necessario et infinitus existit, necessario sequi debuit vel ex absoluta natura alicuius attributi Dei, vel ex aliquo attributo modificato modificatione, quae et necessario et infinita existit. [in: P. 1. prop. 32., app.]
ellauri158.html on line 283: P. 1. prop. 28. Quodcumque singulare, sive quaevis res quae finita est et determinatam habet existentiam, non potest existere nec ad operandum determinari, nisi ad existendum et operandum determinetur ab alia causa, quae etiam finita est et determinatam habet existentiam; et rursus haec causa non potest etiam existere neque ad operandum determinari, nisi ab alia, quae etiam finita est et determinatam habet existentiam, determinetur ad existendum et operandum, et sic in infinitum. [in: P. 1. prop. 32., P. 2. prop. 9., lem. 3., prop. 30., prop. 31., prop. 48., P. 4. prop. 29., P. 5. prop. 6.]
ellauri158.html on line 293: P. 1. prop. 30. Intellectus actu finitus aut actu infinitus Dei attributa Deique affectiones comprehendere debet et nihil aliud. [in: P. 2. prop. 4.]
ellauri158.html on line 297: P. 1. prop. 31. Intellectus actu, sive is finitus sit sive infinitus, ut et voluntas, cupiditas, amor etc. ad naturam naturatam, non vero ad naturantem referri debent.
ellauri158.html on line 346: P. 2. defin. 5. Duratio est indefinita existendi continuatio.
ellauri158.html on line 354: P. 2. defin. 7. Per res singulares intelligo res, quae finitae sunt et determinatam habent existentiam. Quod si plura individua in una actione ita concurrant, ut omnia simul unius effectus sint causa, eadem omnia eatenus ut unam rem singularem considero.
ellauri158.html on line 402: P. 2. prop. 4. Idea Dei, ex qua infinita infinitis modis sequuntur, unica tantum esse potest.
ellauri158.html on line 422: -- P. 2. prop. 7. coroll. Hinc sequitur, quod Dei cogitandi potentia aequalis est ipsius actuali agendi potentiae; hoc est, quicquid ex infinita Dei natura sequitur formaliter, id omne ex Dei idea eodem ordine eademque connexione sequitur in Deo obiective. [in: P. 2. prop. 32., prop. 36., prop. 38., prop. 39., P. 3. prop. 28., P. 5. prop. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 432: P. 2. prop. 8. Ideae rerum singularium sive modorum non existentium ita debent comprehendi in Dei infinita idea, ac rerum singularium sive modorum essentiae formales in Dei attributis continentur. [in: prop. 45., P. 3. prop. 11. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 433: -- P. 2. prop. 8. coroll. Hinc sequitur, quod, quamdiu res singulares non existunt, nisi quatenus in Dei attributis comprehenduntur, earum esse obiectivum sive ideae non existunt, nisi quatenus infinita Dei idea existit; et ubi res singulares dicuntur existere, non tantum quatenus in Dei attributis comprehenduntur, sed quatenus etiam durare dicuntur, earum ideae etiam existentiam, per quam durare dicuntur, involvent. [in: P. 2. prop. 9., prop. 11., prop. 15., prop. 45., P. 3. prop. 11. schol., P. 5. prop. 21., prop. 23.]
ellauri158.html on line 438: P. 2. prop. 9. Idea rei singularis actu existentis Deum pro causa habet, non quatenus infinitus est, sed quatenus alia rei singularis actu existentis idea affectus consideratur, cuius etiam Deus est causa, quatenus alia tertia affectus est, et sic in infinitum. [in: P. 2. prop. 9. coroll., prop. 19., prop. 20., prop. 24., prop. 25., P. 3. prop. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 451: -- P. 2. prop. 11. coroll. Hinc sequitur mentem humanam partem esse infiniti intellectus Dei. ... [in: P. 2. prop. 12., prop. 13., prop. 19., prop. 22., prop. 23., prop. 24., prop. 30., prop. 34., prop. 38., prop. 39., prop. 40., prop. 43., prop. 43. schol., P. 3. prop. 1., prop. 28., P. 5. prop. 36.]
ellauri158.html on line 487: ---- lem. 3. Corpus motum vel quiescens ad motum vel quietem determinari debuit ab alio corpore, quod etiam ad motum vel quietem determinatum fuit ab alio, et illud iterum ab alio, et sic in infinitum.
ellauri158.html on line 688: All such opinions spring from the notion commonly entertained, that all things in nature act as men themselves act, namely, with an end in view. It is accepted as certain, that God himself directs all things to a definite goal (for it is said that God made all things for man, and man that he might worship him). I will, therefore, consider this opinion, asking first, why it obtains general credence, and why all men are naturally so prone to adopt it? secondly, I will point out its falsity; and, lastly, I will show how it has given rise to prejudices about good and bad, right and wrong, praise and blame, order and confusion, beauty and ugliness, and the like.
ellauri158.html on line 694: Hence also it follows, that everyone thought out for himself, according to his abilities, a different way of worshipping God, so that God might love him more than his fellows, and direct the whole course of nature for the satisfaction of his blind cupidity and insatiable avarice. Thus the prejudice developed into superstition, and took deep root in the human mind; and for this reason everyone strove most zealously to understand and explain the final causes of things; but in their endeavor to show that nature does nothing in vain, i.e. nothing which is useless to man, they only seem to have demonstrated that nature, the gods, and men are all mad together. Consider, I pray you, the result: among the many helps of nature they were bound to find some hindrances, such as storms, earthquakes, diseases, &c.: so they declared that such things happen, because the gods are angry at some wrong done to them by men, or at some fault committed in their worship. Experience day by day protested and showed by infinite examples, that good and evil fortunes fall to the lot of pious and impious alike; still they would not abandon their inveterate prejudice, for it was more easy for them to class such contradictions among other unknown things of whose use they were ignorant, and thus to retain their actual and innate condition of ignorance, than to destroy the whole fabric of their reasoning and start afresh. They therefore laid down as an axiom, that God´s judgments far transcend human understanding. Such a doctrine might well have sufficed to conceal the truth from the human race for all eternity, if mathematics had not furnished another standard of verity in considering solely the essence and properties of figures without regard to their final causes. There are other reasons (which I need not mention here) besides mathematics, which might have caused men´s minds to be directed to these general prejudices, and have led them to the knowledge of the truth.
ellauri158.html on line 733: P. 2. prop. 45. Unaquaeque cuiuscumque corporis, vel rei singularis actu existentis idea Dei aeternam et infinitam essentiam necessario involvit. [in: P. 2. prop. 46., prop. 47., P. 5. prop. 20. schol., prop. 29. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 739: P. 2. prop. 46. Cognitio aeternae et infinitae essentiae Dei, quam unaquaeque idea involvit, est adaequata et perfecta. [in: P. 2. prop. 47., P. 5. prop. 18., prop. 31.]
ellauri158.html on line 742: P. 2. prop. 47. Mens humana adaequatam habet cognitionem aeternae et infinitae essentiae Dei. [in: P. 4. prop. 36., prop. 36. schol., prop. 37., P. 5. prop. 18.]
ellauri158.html on line 746: P. 2. prop. 48. In mente nulla est absoluta sive libera voluntas, sed mens ad hoc vel illud volendum determinatur a causa, quae etiam ab alia determinata est, et haec iterum ab alia, et sic in infinitum. [in: P. 2. prop. 49., prop. 49. coroll., P. 3. aff. defin. 6., etiam in: TP cap. 2. art. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 777: P. 3. prop. 8. Conatus, quo unaquaeque res in suo esse perseverare conatur, nullum tempus finitum, sed indefinitum involvit. [in: P. 3. prop. 9.]
ellauri158.html on line 778: P. 3. prop. 9. Mens tam quatenus claras et distinctas, quam quatenus confusas habet ideas, conatur in suo esse perseverare indefinita quadam duratione, et huius sui conatus est conscia. [in: P. 3. prop. 12., prop. 13., prop. 58.]
ellauri158.html on line 879: Affectuum definitiones.
ellauri158.html on line 1000: P. 4. prop. 3. Vis, qua homo in existendo perseverat, limitata est et a potentia causarum externarum infinite superatur. [in: P. 4. prop. 4., prop. 6., prop. 15., prop. 43., prop. 69.]
ellauri158.html on line 1003: P. 4. prop. 5. Vis et incrementum cuiuscumque passionis, eiusque in existendo perseverantia non definitur potentia, qua nos in existendo perseverare conamur, sed causae externae potentia cum nostra comparata. [in: P. 4. prop. 6., prop. 7., prop. 15., prop. 43., prop. 69., P. 5. prop. 8., prop. 20. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 1102: propositionum, definitionum et al. qui in e t h i c e continentur,
ellauri158.html on line 1150: P. 5. axiom. 2. Effectus potentia definitur potentia ipsius causae, quatenus eius essentia per ipsius causae essentiam explicatur vel definitur. [in: P. 5. prop. 8. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 1207: P. 5. prop. 35. Deus se ipsum amore intellectuali infinito amat. [in: P. 5. prop. 36., prop. 36. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 1208: P. 5. prop. 36. Mentis amor intellectualis erga Deum est ipse Dei amor, quo Deus se ipsum amat, non quatenus infinitus est, sed quatenus per essentiam humanae mentis sub specie aeternitatis consideratam explicari potest, hoc est, mentis erga Deum amor intellectualis pars est infiniti amoris, quo Deus se ipsum amat. [in: P. 5. prop. 42.]
ellauri159.html on line 657: The word used to translate the Greek word agape in most modern English Bibles is love, but in many older translations, agape was translated as “charity” when it was used in a context of one person to another. In a biblical context, this term should not be mistaken for the more modern use of the word to mean only giving to those in need (i.e., “giving to charity”), although this can be a substantial part of what’s meant by the word. A more encompassing definition of the word charity, at least in the context of a modern-day knight, would be to be charitable (or giving) to the rich as well, or even primarily.
ellauri159.html on line 689: Webster’s definition of purity is, "Free from anything that taints, impairs; clear, unmixed, 100% the real thing".
ellauri159.html on line 711: Most definitions of courtesy will include simple action terms, such as “displaying polished manners” or “showing respect for others.” More elaborate definitions may describe courtesy as “sophisticated conversation and intellectual skill.” The original term comes from the twelfth century term courteis, which meant “gentle politeness” and “courtly manners.” Regardless of which definition makes the most sense to you, courtesy is something you must see in action—it is not a trait like humility that can just be held internally. Se on tollasta ilmaista uhrimieltä.
ellauri159.html on line 757: As I’ve been working on this series, thinking through the tradition of manhood, and attempting to synthesize Gilmore’s findings and the manifestations of the manly code in different cultures, boy, it’s really tasked my brain. When my mind got tied up in knots and the meaning of manhood became seemingly impenetrable and obscure, I often found myself thinking about the definition of masculinity laid out in Jack Donovan’s The Way of Men. It is so simple that even I can wrap my skull around it.
ellauri159.html on line 789: So what are the defining traits of femininity? Oh-hoho, I’m not going to touch that with a ten-foot pole. I´m not THAT brave. It’s taken me years to understand manhood, and I’m still refining my views. I wouldn’t appreciate it if a woman who hadn’t rigorously studied masculinity offered an off-the-cuff definition for it, so I will refrain from doing likewise. Someone should start an awesome Art of Womanliness-type blog and explore the subject. I’ll be a reader.
ellauri159.html on line 1327: Itchele Singer luki Varsovassa kirjaklubissa spiritualisteja ja Will to Believeä. Denim-housuinen nojatuolipsykologi Bill James ähertää ja puurtaa siinä puolustaaxeen cartesiolaista dualismia. Pascalin veto on efektiivisesti sama vedätys kuin the American Dream. Monoteismi ja monismi olivat joutuneet pahaan hakauxeen lännessä (pace Spinoza), mikä alkoi haitata länsikapitalismin voittoputkea. Kähmintä on hyvä aloittaa vastapuolen termien anastuxesta. To express a tolerably definite philosophic attitude in a very untechnical way.
ellauri159.html on line 1419: The world appears as a pluralism, 264. Elements of unity in the pluralism, 268. Hegel's excessive claims, 273. He makes of negation a bond of union, 273. The principle of totality, 277. Monism and pluralism, 279. The fallacy of accident in Hegel, 280. The good and the bad infinite, 284. Negation, 286. Conclusion, 292.—Note on the Anaesthetic revelation, 294.
ellauri161.html on line 494: Now, one friend said that "Don't Look Up" was a masterpiece. Well, I wouldn't go as far as to calling it a masterpiece. Sure, "Don't Look Up" was a watchable movie, and writers Adam McKay and David Sirota definitely had some good jabs at the crazy world we live in today, with the likes of a crazy president, everything being on social media, people being concerned about riches even when facing extinction and such. I found the movie to be watchable and enjoyable, sure, but it wasn't a masterpiece, nor will it become a classic movie for me.
ellauri161.html on line 691: This films keeps tripping over itself like a sad old drunk person, I had reasonably high hopes for this self indulgent poorly focused ruse. Definitely save your time.
ellauri161.html on line 861: Sivu 201 - Cette doctrine pourra sembler paradoxale sans doute, et même ridicule, parce que l'opinion environnante en impose ; mais attendez que l'affinité naturelle de la religion et de la science les réunisse dans la tête d'un seul homme de génie : l'apparition de cet homme ne saurait être éloignée ; et peut-être même existe-t-il déjà. Celui-là sera fameux, et mettra fin au...
ellauri161.html on line 923: Pendant cette période, en Russie, Joseph de Maistre est convaincu de prosélytisme religieux, sous l'influence des Jésuites. Il serait, dit-on, à l'origine de la conversion au catholicisme de la comtesse Rostopchine et de sa fille, la future comtesse de Ségur. Les Jésuites sont expulsés de Saint-Pétersbourg et de Moscou en 1815 et quitteront définitivement la Russie en 1820. Oppikohan se koskaan venättä? Tokkopa, tai ehkä vaan sanomaan "le bistrot!".
ellauri161.html on line 1112: Few mystics have ascended to the empyrean where Ruysbroeck so constantly dwelt; and the endeavor to compress into forms of speech the visions seen in a state where all clear and real apprehension is at an end occasioned the fault of indefiniteness with which his writings must be charged. His influence over theological and philosophical thought was not so great as that exercised by Eckart and Tauler, and was chiefly limited to his immediate surroundings. The Brotherhood of the Common Life (q.v.) was founded by Gerhard Groot, one of Ruysbroeck´s pupils, and its first inception may perhaps be traced back to Ruysbroeck himself — a proof that he was not wholly indifferent to the conditions of practical life.
ellauri163.html on line 394: J-sus didn't have the right DNA link. He didn't have the anointing (he was never anointed as a king). He never ruled. He wasn't, by any definition, a (let alone "the") messiah. "The" messiah will have be a male descendent of Solomon, he will be properly anointed as king and he will fulfill the prophecies.
ellauri164.html on line 191: Berkeleyn kiinnostuksen kohteena ei ollut vain filosofia, vaan myös uskonnolliset kysymykset, matematiikka ja yhteiskunnalliset uudistukset. Matematiikassa Berkeley arvosteli – varsin terävänäköisesti – vastikään keksittyä differentiaali- ja integraalilaskentaa, jonka käsitteelliset perusteet olivat hänen mielestään täysin sekavat. Se ei ymmärtänyt sitä yhtään. Vaikka olis luullut että infinitesimaali olis ollut just idealistin cup of tea. Berkeleyn kritiikki ei johtanut matematiikassa uusiin keksintöihin, vaan differentiaali- ja integraalilaskenta saatettiin täsmälliselle pohjalle 1800-luvulla Dedekindin toimesta.
ellauri164.html on line 483: Moses is one of the most prominent figures in the Old Testament. While Abraham is called the “Father of the Faithful” and the recipient of God’s unconditional covenant of grace to His people, Moses was the man chosen to bring redemption to His people. God specifically chose Moses to lead the Israelites from captivity in Egypt to salvation in the Promised Land. Moses is also recognized as the mediator of the Old Covenant and is commonly referred to as the giver of the Law. Finally, Moses is the principal author of the Pentateuch, the foundational books of the entire Bible. Moses’ role in the Old Testament is a type and shadow of the role Jesus plays in the New Testament. As such, his life is definitely worth examining.
ellauri171.html on line 1000: If one knew nothing about the biblical character Jezebel, but used a search engine to find more information, the search results would have almost nothing to do with her as she appears in the Hebrew bible. She is one of the few biblical characters to have become her own noun; in the modern world, “Jezebel” connotes a sexually immoral woman. The thesaurus yields results such as “floozy, hooker, and hussy.” The Urban Dictionary returns definitions like:
ellauri180.html on line 214: To date, a more definite function cannot be ascribed to the prepuce, but as an accessible and ready source of fibroblasts, it has become a favourite tissue reservoir for cell-culture biologists and hence basic scientific research.
ellauri180.html on line 300: One study found in 2018 that (of the books in the sample), although non-Hispanic white people account for 60 percent of the U.S. population, they wrote 89 percent of the books. 40 percent of their characters most definitely aren't POC or Latino.
ellauri181.html on line 577: When he completed his list of the virtues to which he aspired, Franklin wrote a brief sentence describing each of the virtues and what it meant to him. He did not want there to be any confusion about what each of these words meant. His definitions of his virtues then looked like this.....
ellauri182.html on line 185: Amitābha is the principal buddha in Pure Land Buddhism, a branch of East Asian Buddhism. In Vajrayana Buddhism, Amitābha is known for his longevity attribute, magnetising Western attributes of discernment, pure perception and purification of the aggregates with a deep awareness of emptiness of all phenomena. According to these scriptures, Amitābha possesses infinite merit resulting from good deeds over countless past lives as a bodhisattva named Dharmākara. Amitābha means "Infinite Light", and Amitāyus means "Infinite Life" so Amitābha is also called "The Buddha of Immeasurable Light and Life". Kuulostaa ihan määzhik kortilta.
ellauri182.html on line 195: For Jōdo Shinshū practitioners, shinjin develops over time through "deep hearing" (monpo) of Amitābha's call of the nembutsu. According to Shinran, "to hear" means "that sentient beings, having heard how the Buddha's Vow arose—its origin and fulfillment—are altogether free of doubt."[9] Jinen also describes the way of naturalness whereby Amitābha's infinite light illumines and transforms the deeply rooted karmic evil of countless rebirths into good karma. It is of note that such evil karma is not destroyed but rather transformed: Shin stays within the Mahayana tradition's understanding of śūnyatā and understands that samsara and nirvana are not separate. Once the practitioner's mind is united with Amitābha and Buddha-nature gifted to the practitioner through shinjin, the practitioner attains the state of non-retrogression, whereupon after his death it is claimed he will achieve instantaneous and effortless enlightenment. He will then return to the world as a Bodhisattva, that he may work towards the salvation of all beings.
ellauri182.html on line 452:
ellauri184.html on line 353: Many of Jesus´ Jewish audience would have been reminded of Isaiah´s condemnation of Babylon in Isaiah 14:15: "But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit." Babylon may have been the definition of an evil city, and here Jesus is describing Capernaum as sharing the same fate. Kotiporukat ei ota sitä vakavasti. Sittenpähän ottavat, vitun homot.
ellauri184.html on line 785: This is a bold fearless work and definitely not for the faint of heart. I am not surprised that when this was originally published in 1991, it created lots of controversies with the Catholic Church condemning Jose Saramago for harboring anti-religious vision and his own Portuguese government asking the European Literary Prize to remove this from its shortlist because of the book’s offensive content to religion. Despite this book’s existence, Saramago won the 1998 Nobel Prize for Literature.
ellauri189.html on line 143: heterogeneous concept) man enacts the drama of his life. The borders of this realm are indicated by the movement of the sun, arising from behind the horizon and, after moving through half of its orbit, again setting beyond this infinitely receding meeting point between heaven and earth. In Malczewski’s
ellauri189.html on line 199: The centre of our planetary system is the visible sign of the infinity of immanence and contains the cyclical essence of being, not merely indicating this con-dition, but also embodying it: this celestial body is subject to an infinite movement without apparent linear direction. But the stages of the sun’s voyage could also be interpreted as stages of human life (birth, youth, maturity, old age) and this circumstance inclines man to perceive a similarity between a celestial body and a feeling sublunary body (does man deceive himself, thinking it a bond of
ellauri189.html on line 209: with its receding horizon, melting into heaven, shows two different countenances of infinity. Man may spontaneously recognize the identity of linear and cyclical infinity, but the basis of this identity is not an empirically established fact, but an assumption, a matter of belief. The wheel of Karma is not so different from Schopenhauers endless rounds of the lush parks of Frankfurt following the dark star behind his poodle Atman.
ellauri189.html on line 211: There is no escape from the infinity of being that is spontaneously experienced as contingent, lacking an ultimate justification, a goal that, in order to
ellauri189.html on line 212: satisfy man, must be situated somewhere in space (be present as a phenomenon), which on the one hand is represented as receding into an infinite distance, and on the other hand as a “theatre”, in which phenomena eternally repeat the same circular movement (only half of their orbit is visible against the background of the heavenly dome – the other half remains hidden in the dark).
ellauri189.html on line 218: on the infinite plain of being, but the ultimate catastrophe (wiping out both
ellauri189.html on line 562: Some of the first recorded incidents to meet the modern definition of the Ponzi scheme were carried out from 1869 to 1872 by Adele Spitzeder in Germany and by Sarah Howe in the United States in the 1880s through the "Ladies' Deposit". Howe offered a solely female clientele an 8% monthly interest rate and then stole the money that the women had invested. She was eventually discovered and served three years in prison. The Ponzi scheme was also previously described in novels; Charles Dickens' 1844 novel Martin Chuzzlewit and his 1857 novel Little Dorrit both feature such a scheme.
ellauri190.html on line 261: In the first half of the 14th century, most of what is now Ukraine was cleared of the Mongols by the troops of a powerful ruler of Lithuania, Gedimin, and Ukraine became a part of the Great Duchy of Lithuania. The latter was a peculiar country. The bulk of its territory and population was what now is the Slavic country of Belarus. Only a small minority of its people traced their origin from the Baltic tribes, while the majority were Slavs. Gedimin’s name in modern Lithuanian is Gyadiminas, but in the chronicles he is named Kgindimin or Kindimin, which might have a Slavic root. The language of Gedimin’s court, and the court of his sons and grandsons was very Slavic, much like a mixture of somewhat archaic Ukrainian and Belarusian. The laws of the entire Duchy, the so-called Lithuanian Statutes, were written in the Cyrillic alphabet and read very much like the Belarusian (definitely Slavic) language. So they were bad guys in anyone's book already then.
ellauri192.html on line 267: Even the specialist in modern literary history will be hard put to recall, let alone have any serious awareness of, such luminaries as Rudolf Eucken, a philosopher crowned in 1908; as the Danish novelist Henrik Pontoppidan (1917); or as Grazia Deledda, the Sardinian novelist who, in 1926, became one of the very few women to be chosen. And look how bad she was! Even where the recipients are illustrious, their work has repeatedly fallen outside normal definitions of literature. Eucken, Bergson, Bertrand Russell are philosophers. Theodor Mommsen, honored in 1902, was a great historian and epigrapher of ancient Rome, but hardly one whose prose has made the German language live. Churchill (1953) . . . was Churchill. He had a toilet in his gum shoe, with letter W.C written on it and paper in the tip.
ellauri194.html on line 313: Sedgwick' died of breast cancer in 2009 aged 58,. She deploys erudite and playful readings of texts by Oscar Wilde, Henry James and Marcel Proust to interrogate assumptions about the stability of sexual identity and how language works to define a homo/heterosexual binary. She writes: "An understanding of virtually any aspect of modern western culture must be not merely incomplete but damaged in its central substance to the degree that it does not incorporate a critical analysis of modern homo/heterosexual definition."
ellauri196.html on line 858: Popular art has infinite roads in front of it because the population of the world is in continuous growth. But its limit is absolute void, as the monkey population eventually drives itself into extinction and dies out.
ellauri196.html on line 859: Man’s life is short and the life of the world can be almost infinitely long. Well not quite but very very long in comparison. Human life on earth nears its end like my boring speech.
ellauri197.html on line 295: The shift in verb tenses is remarkable in this first stanza to address the narrator’s unclear thoughts that are connected to whatever memory she wishes to “forget.” Within the first two lines of ‘How Happy I Was If I Could Forget’, the reader encounters past tense in “was” and the subjunctive imagined prospect of “if I could forget.” This “if” indicates that this is only a wish the narrator has, meaning it is not past, present, or future because it has not happened and will not definitively ever happen. From there, the narrator turns to the present tense by saying, “how sad I am.” There is no clear way that all of these verb tenses senspibly link up, and this grammatic confusion mirrors how uncertain and shaken the narrator is from this memory’s lingering presence.
ellauri197.html on line 337: In ‘Love’s Organ's Growth’, the poet says that love is not a quintessence or pure and simple stuff despite its sustaining and life-giving properties. Rather, it is mixed stuff, a mixture of different elements, both spiritual and physical. That is why it affects both the body and the soul; it causes both spiritual and physical arousal. It does cure not because it is the quintessence, but on the homeopathic principle, of “like curing the like”. It cures all sorrow only by giving more of it. Love is neither infinite nor “pure stuff”, but has a mixed nature like grass which grows with spring.
ellauri197.html on line 350: My love was infinite, if spring make’ it more. Rakkauteni olevan ääretön, kun se kasvaa keväällä.
ellauri197.html on line 381: In the first stanza of ‘Love’s Organ's Growth’, the poet says that he does no longer believe his love to be so pure (simple and unmixed, hence not subject to change), and mixed, as he had earlier supposed it to be, because now he discovers that his love is subject to seasonal fluctuations and changes like the grass. Throughout the winter, the poet lied when he swore that his love was infinite, because what is infinite cannot grow and increase. Now he finds that his love has increased in vigor with the spring. Spring has made some additions to it.
ellauri197.html on line 456: I saw His wisdom infinite, Ääreist erinomainen toi viisaus
ellauri198.html on line 298: Nearly every aspect of the ritual abuse is controversial, including its definition, the source of the allegations and proof thereof, testimonies of alleged victims, and court cases involving the allegations and criminal investigations. The panic affected lawyers, therapists, and social workers who handled allegations of child sexual abuse. Allegations initially brought together widely dissimilar groups, including religious fundamentalists, police investigators, child advocates, therapists, and clients in psychotherapy. The term satanic abuse was more common early on; this later became satanic ritual abuse and further secularized into simply ritual abuse. Over time, the accusations became more closely associated with dissociative identity disorder (then called multiple personality disorder) and anti-government conspiracy theories.
ellauri198.html on line 660: Horace Slughorn is a character in the Harry Potter series of novels by J. K. Rowling. Professor Horace Eugene Flaccus Slughorn (b. 28 April, between 1882 and 1913) was a pure-blood or half-blood wizard. He attended Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry as a member of Slytherin before returning in 1931 as Potions Master. Joopa joo, flaccid slughorn, kiitos JK tiedetään mitä ajat takaa. Although Professor Slughorn certainly isn't a villain in Harry Potter, he's definitely done some rotten things. As they all.
ellauri198.html on line 780: Knowledge is aware not only of itself, but also of the negative of itself, or its limit. Knowing its limit means knowing how to sacrifice itself. This sacrifice is... self-abandonment.... Here it has to begin all over again at its immediacy, as freshly as before, and thence rise once more to the measure of its stature, as if, for it, all that preceded were lost, and as if it had learned nothing from the experience of the spirits that preceded. But re collection has conserved that experience, and is the inner being, and, in fact, the higher form of the substance. While, then, this phase of Spirit begins all over again its formative development, apparently starting solely from itself, yet at the same time it com mences at a higher level. The realm of spirits developed in this way, and assuming definite shape in existence, constitutes a succession, where one detaches and sets loose the other, and each takes over from its predecessor the empire of the spiritual world...
ellauri198.html on line 786: From Hegel we can move to Mallarmé's Igitur, and an illuminating observation by Paul de Man, even as from Kierkegaard we can go back to Childe Roland and the critical mode I endeavor to develop. Meditating on Igitur, de Man remarks that in Baudelaire and in Mallarmé (under Baudelaire's influence) "ennui" is no longer a personal feeling but comes from the burden of the past. A consciousness comes to know itself as negative and finite. It sees that others know themselves also in this way, and so it transcends the negative and finite present by seeing the universal nature of what it itself is becoming. So, de Man says of Mallarmé's view, comparing it to Hegel's, that "we develop by dominating our natural anxiety and alienation and by transforming it in the awareness and the knowledge of otherness." Jotain tosi narsistista läppää tääkin näyttää olevan.
ellauri198.html on line 794: Roland is not mediated by his precursors; they do not detach him from history so as to free him in the spirit. The Childe's last act of dauntless courage is to will repetition, to accept his place in the company of the ruined. Roland tells us implicitly that the present is not so much negative and finite as it is willed, though this willing is never the work of an individual consciousness acting by itself. It is caught up in a subject-to-subject dialectic, in which the present moment is sacrificed, not to the energies of art, but to the near-solipsist's tragic victory over himself. Roland's negative moment is neither that of renunciation nor of the loss of self in death or error. It is the negativity that is self-knowledge yielding its power to a doomed love of others, in the recognition that those others like Shelley. more grandly had surrendered knowledge and its powers to love, however illusory. Or, mos simply, Childe Roland dies, if be dies, in the magnificence of a belatedness that can accept itself as such. He ends in strengh because his vision has ceased to break and deform the world, and has begun to turn its dangerous strength upon is own defense. Roland is the Kermit modem version of a poet-as-hero, and his sustained courage to weather his own phantasmagoria and emerge into fire is a presage of the continued survival of strong poetry.
ellauri210.html on line 1278: My friend responded saying that gay men and women have dependent relationships all the time and it absolutely does not mean the man is not gay or that he is falling for her. Today we call this a 'hag' and they routinely do for women the things Higgins did for Eliza, (make her more fashionable, improve her appeal to men, etc). I am not saying he absolutely was gay, in fact I still think its probable he's not, but its definitely something to consider.
ellauri210.html on line 1321: Alejadas de la maternidad y de casi todo aquello que les da la entidad de mujer, tanto Mansour como Prassinos saben que la “femme-enfant” es algo más que un bello objeto para admirar. Estas autoras desarrollan un concepto de belleza, de sexo y género difuminados, donde entra en juego la noción de identidad y alteridad. Así mismo implica una idea de subversión femenina que se aleja definitivamente del concepto bretoniano de la mujer.
ellauri214.html on line 118: In the even rarer chance, I might be Asian. If I’m Asian, I’m most definitely a victim of human trafficking, waiting to be saved.
ellauri216.html on line 88: Eila ja Maire olivat halukkaita mutta definitiivisesti liian vanhoja.
ellauri219.html on line 475: The very definition of a “triple threat,” Shirley Temple was an actress, singer, and dancer who became a child star in the 30s. She also appears on the Sgt. Pepper album cover three times over, her hair poking out from between the wax figures of John Lennon (No.62) and Ringo Starr (No.63), and also standing in front of the model of Diana Dors (No.70). There’s also a cloth figure of the star off to the far right, wearing a jumper emblazoned with the slogan “Welcome The Rolling Stones.”
ellauri219.html on line 585: To a large degree, "Pelagianism" was defined by its opponent Augustine, and exact definitions remain elusive. Although Pelagianism had considerable support in the contemporary Christian world, especially among the Roman elite and monks, it was attacked by Augustine and his supporters, who had opposing views on grace, predestination and free will. Augustine proved victorious in the Pelagian controversy; Pelagianism was decisively condemned at the 418 Council of Carthage and is still regarded as heretical by the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church.
Burn in hell Pelagius, go jump in the fiery lake! Vitun humanisti! The journey to self-satisfaction is Yogananda's practical hand techniques. Yogananda's teachings don't simply stop at the idea of universal consciousness. He correctly anticipated the growing hunger among spiritual seekers for direct personal experience of the universal consciousness that the masters of yoga, and indeed mystics of every religious tradition, describe. He therefore synthesized a set of powerful but practical techniques to guide self-seekers on the spiritual path all the way to the ultimate union, drawing on the eight steps laid out by Patanjali in the Yoga Sutras.
Like En (Bara En) in Sumerian, the Akkadian bēlu and Northwest Semitic baʿal (as well as its feminine form baʿalah) was used as a title of various deities in the Mesopotamian and Semitic pantheons. Only a definite article, genitive or epithet, or context could establish which particular god was meant.
The actual definitions of those "values" flip dramatically depending on who controls the White House. Democrat-led Administrations tended to condition foreign assistance and partnerships on compliance with environmental standards, climate goals (e.g., Paris Agreement targets), diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, and explicit LGBTQ+/gender rights protections. Republican/Trump Administrations: Systematically roll back or outright ban those specific grant conditions. Instead, aid and diplomatic alignment are often conditioned on different sets of ideological or policy priorities—such as restricting access to foreign funding for reproductive health/abortion providers (e.g., the Mexico City Policy/Global Gag Rule), prioritizing border enforcement/migration controls, deregulation, fossil fuel development, and restricting diversity or ESG programs abroad.
ellauri219.html on line 798: No it is not because of the clash in values between American individualism and libertarianism, and the rest of the West’s social democracy and collectivism. That’s a contributing factor among those with enough cultural affinity and exposure to get to know how the US ticks, which maybe explains some of the last decade or so, with the Internet. But again, the “Death to Amreeka” crowds, the sneering at the unsophisticated doughboys, the dismissal of American culture—all that predated that deep familiarity by decades. The discovery of the substantive cultural mismatches were again a late addition and confirmation bias. (How I like the scientific sound of it: confirmation bias.)
ellauri221.html on line 110: Narcissistic personality disorder was nearly dropped from the DSM V. Narcissistic personality disorder was first defined in 1967. The DSM-IV defines the essential feature of narcissism as "a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy that begins in early adulthood and is present in a variety of contexts." It's a definition that was set before the rise of social networking, reality TV, or partisan news channels designed to confirm our every opinion. Perhaps it truly is time to update it.
ellauri222.html on line 149: The subject of “Augie March” is the same as the subject of “Dangling Man” and “The Victim”: the danger of becoming trapped in other people’s definition of you. In the case of “Augie March,” the person in danger of being trapped was Saul Bellow. “This was not what being a novelist was supposed to have meant”: he is referring to the expectations of his intellectual backers. He realized that he didn’t want to be the great hope of the novel or to give voice to a generation’s angst. He wanted to write up the life he knew in the way James Joyce had written up the life he knew, and to transform it into a fantastic verbal artifact, a book that broke all the rules.
ellauri222.html on line 281: Mitä vetoa että Rothin kuikelo veti tästä herneen nenään? Sai takuulla paskahalvauxen. No, Saul was definitely not a good friend. Phil said something like: ‘He wouldn’t be the first guy whose companionship I’d seek out in the afterlife.’”
ellauri222.html on line 807: Ihmiset kysyvät myös: What is a simple definition of transcendentalism?
ellauri222.html on line 963: For n≤4 and any bounded smooth domain Ω⊂ℝ n , we establish the existence of a global weak solution for the Landau-Lifshitz equation on Ω with respect to smooth initial-boundary data, which is smooth off a closed set with locally finite n-dimensional parabolic Hausdorff measure. The approach is based on the Ginzburg-Landau approximation, a time slice energy monotonicity inequality, and an energy decay estimate under the smallness of renormalized Ginzburg-Landau energies.
ellauri223.html on line 137: Later on, the philosopher Baruch Spinoza also agreed with the doctrine, when he said: “By reality and perfection I mean the same thing” (Ethics, part II, definition VI). Leibniz adhered to the doctrine as well, as do the Baha'i. Elämme parhaassa mahdollisessa maailmassa, ystävä hyvä. Mitä puppua.
ellauri223.html on line 141: Homo mensura est appellatio doctrinae, quam Protagoras prima sententia libri sui de veritate (Ἀλήθεια) scripti exposuit. Primum testimonium huius sententiae apud Platonem invenitur, sed quia enuntiato infinitivo constracta est, oratio recta apud Sextum Empiricum et Diogenem Laertium servata saepe citari solet:
ellauri236.html on line 210: One ought not to infer too much from the success of Mr. Chase's books. It is possible that it is an isolated phenomenon, brought about by the mingled boredom and brutality of war. (LOL) But if such books should definitely acclimatize themselves in England (or Nigeria!), instead of being merely a half-understood import from America, there would be good grounds for dismay. In choosing Raffles as a background for No Orchids I deliberately chose a book which by the standards of its time was morally equivocal. Raffles, as I have pointed out, has no real moral code, no religion, certainly no social consciousness. All he has is a set of reflexes the nervous system, as it were, of a gentleman. Give him a sharp tap on this reflex or that (they are called ‘sport’, ‘pal’, ‘woman’, ‘king and country’ and so forth), and you get a predictable reaction. In Mr. Chase's books there are no gentlemen and no taboos. Emancipation is complete. Freud and Machiavelli have reached the outer suburbs. Comparing the schoolboy atmosphere of the one book with the cruelty and corruption of the other, one is driven to feel that snobbishness, like hypocrisy, is a check upon behaviour whose value from a social point of view has been underrated.
ellauri243.html on line 169: There may be no other organ on the human body that profits from such creativity in nicknaming by the larger populace. Not even clam, or twat. Below is a list of 100+ slang words for penis—from the common (prick) to the more grotesque (fuckpole) and the awesomely ridiculous (pork sword). Next time you need a synonym for penis, comb through this definitive list for a bunch of fun ideas!
ellauri243.html on line 182: There may be no other organ on the human body that profits from such creativity in nicknaming by the larger populace. Except penis. Below is a list of 60+ slang words for vagina —from the common (pussy) to the more grotesque (cunt) and the awesomely ridiculous (fishmarket). Next time you need a synonym for vulva, comb through this definitive list for a bunch of fun ideas!
ellauri244.html on line 571: Part Four focuses on the period several hundred years after Jonathan and his students have left the Flock and their teachings become venerated rather than practiced. The birds spend all their time extolling the virtues of Jonathan and his students and spend no time flying for flying's sake. The seagulls practice strange rituals and use demonstrations of their respect for Jonathan and his students as status symbols. Eventually some birds reject the ceremony and rituals and just start flying. Eventually one bird named Anthony Gull questions the value of living since "...life is pointless and since pointless is by definition meaningless then the only proper act is to dive into the ocean and drown. Better not to exist at all than to exist like a seaweed, without meaning or joy [...] He had to die sooner or later anyway, and he saw no reason to prolong the painful boredom of living." As Anthony makes a dive-bomb to the sea, at a speed and from an altitude which would kill him, a white blur flashes alongside him. Anthony catches up to the blur, which turns out to be a seagull, and asks what the bird was doing:
ellauri245.html on line 681: Its 2022, Im 56 yrs old (born 1966 that is), kids grown, 5am, and feeling a little menopausal. Came back to a song that from the 1st time I heard it in my teens, I pictured the guy of my dreams singing to me. (Definitely not this wimpy tenor Chris with thinning bangles, but another more manly guy.) Didn´t we all? Definitely a classic! Greetings to us all narcissistic women of the eighties!
ellauri247.html on line 513: What does fantassin mean? - definitions
ellauri254.html on line 294: Runoilijan perhe-elämä ei ollut helppoa. Bloc todella palvoi valittua, mutta hän oli vakuuttunut siitä, että avioliiton tärkein henkinen affiniteetti ei ollut fyysinen vaan epäfyysinen. Tämän seurauksena hänen vaimonsa sai paljon miesystäviä. Lubov Mendeleeva oli näyttelijä ja siksi hän teki helposti romaaneja. Blok huomasi tässä harrastuksessa sekä nöyryyttä että köyrintää. Yhden tällaisen romaanin jälkeen hänen vaimollaan on poika, ja Blok tunnistaa hänet Tonyn tekemäxi. Blok tykkää vaimostaan näissä hetkissä ja tukahduttaa vihaa, kateutta ja aggressiota. Kaiken hän on valmis kestämään vaimoltaan muttei tätä. Block oli valmis sietämään kaikenlaiset sarvettajat jos heillä oli hyvä suhde hänen vaimonsa kanssa. Mutta hän ymmärsi lopulta että vaimon isokainalo oli pohjaton kuilu, ja lopulta he erosivat. Hänellä oli sittemmin naisia, joita hän muutti kuin käsineitä. Block puhui heistä: "Myrkky - toisen myrkyn jälkeen".
ellauri256.html on line 503: The most widely accepted modern definition of the "Western World" is based not upon geographical location but upon the cultural (or when appropriate, political or economic) identities of the countries in question. Using this definition, the Western World includes Europe as well as any countries whose cultures are strongly influenced by European values or whose populations include many people descended from European colonists—for example Australia, New Zealand, and most countries in North and South America .
ellauri256.html on line 505: By the mid-20th century, Western culture had become widespread throughout the world with the help of mass media, such as television, film, radio, and music. The term "Western culture" is used broadly to refer to traditions, social norms, religious beliefs, technologies, and political systems. Because the culture is so widespread today, the term "Western World" has taken on a cultural, economic, and political definition—but those definitions can differ from one another.
ellauri257.html on line 73: The cocky and arrogant Taras raises two sons, Andrei (Tony Curtis) and Ostap (Perry Lopez), and eventually sends them to Kiev University to learn how their enemies think. The independent-minded Andrei falls in love with Natalia (Christine Kaufmann), a young beautiful Polish noblewoman, but her family deems him unworthy of her because of his lowly birth. The heartbroken Andrei returns home to the steppes and his bloodthirsty barbarian warrior father—definitely not a college grad.
ellauri260.html on line 271: The denial of the Heavenly Dad had its various stages. Positivism was one of the mildest types, they just put the cosmic problem aside. More drastic was the radical German philosophy, particularly Neo-Hegelianism. The leader was Ludwig Feuerbach, who won large numbers of adherents by the definiteness of his statements and the glow of his eloquence. Religion, like everything supersensual, seemed to him "outworn." Engels, who was an ardent follower of Feuerbach, said : " We have done with God." NIetzsche, my competitor for Religion seemed to Feuerbach an illegitimate extension to the whole scheme of things of man's ideas and aspirations : a mischievous illusion which weakened the power of men and distracted them from their proper aims. His ideas are easily gathered from these words of his : " God was my first, reason my second, man my third and final thought."
ellauri260.html on line 311: Socialisation alone will give the Socialistic life a definite embodiment. It confidently enters upon a struggle against the distraction and the egoism of individuals. The traditional idea of work makes a man think mainly of his own profit. It impels him to think first of all of himself.
ellauri260.html on line 321: Neither individual nor community must make concern about material things its chief business. The indefinite craving of the individual is a lower impulse that must be checked in every way, and all hunting after money for its own sake must be branded a danger- ous aberration. And as this ideal regards economic activity merely as a means to higher ends, it does not bring the two together in one whole and cannot recognise any particular economic legislation
ellauri262.html on line 456: Personism is an ethical philosophy of personhood as typified by the thought of the utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer. It amounts to a branch of secular humanism with an emphasis on certain rights-criteria. Personists believe that rights are conferred to the extent that a creature is a person. Michael Tooley provides the relevant definition of a person, saying it is a creature that is "capable of desiring to continue as a subject of experience and other mental states". A worldview like secular humanism is personism when the empathy and values are extended to the extent that the creature is a person (apes get very similar rights, insects get vastly fewer rights, etc.).
ellauri262.html on line 459: Consequently, a member of the human species may not necessarily fit the definition of "person" and thereby not receive all the rights bestowed to a person. Hence, such philosophers have engaged in arguing that certain disabled individuals (such as those with a mental capacity that is similar to or is perceived as being similar to an infant) are not persons. This philosophy is also supposedly open to the idea that such non-human persons as machines, animals, and extraterrestrial intelligences may be entitled to certain rights currently granted only to humans. The basic criteria for the entitlement of rights, are the intellect (thinking ability, problem solving in real life circumstances and not mere calculation), and sometimes empathy (but not necessarily, because not all humans are empathetic; but indifference in the pain of others and crime are certainly criteria for the deprivation of rights. Genuine empathy is not required to achieve acceptable behavior, but a digital limbic system and a dopaminergic pathways alternative, would deliver a more acceptable result for future MPs judging on rights expansion.). Personism may have views in common with transhumanism.
ellauri264.html on line 85: L’action du drame se passe à Mayence, au quartier général des armées françaises en 1793. Les officiers soupçonnent de trahison d’Oyron, un de leurs camarades, d’origine aristocratique. Une lettre saisie sur un paysan rhénanien semble prouver la trahison de d’Oyron. Rolland avait l’intention de démontrer son impartialité. Pour atteindre ce but, il voulait que l’innocence de d’Oyron ne pût être établie de manière définitive.
ellauri264.html on line 88: Dans sa réaction violente contre le milieu à la fois dreyfusard et juif auquel il est intimement lié malgré lui, Rolland perd toute impartialité et finit pas assimiler les défenseurs de Dreyfus aux Juifs. La cause dreyfusarde, c’est la campagne des Juifs ou celle de la Banque juive. En realite, la plupart d’entre eux se tenaient à l’écart. Les Juifs ne voulaient pas qu’on les accuse de prendre parti pour Dreyfus parce qu’il était, comme eux, Juif.
ellauri264.html on line 679: Definitely one of the darkest stories about Steve Jobs has to be the Breakout story. In the 1970’s, Steve Jobs was working for Atari, designing the game Breakout. Overwhelmed with work with a deadline quickly approaching, he approached Steve Wozniak for help in finishing his project within the next four days. In exchange for his help, Jobs offered Woz half of what he was earning, which he said was $700. For four days, Jobs and Wozniak worked day and night without sleep. When they were done, they were sick with mono and exhausted, but they finished the project before the deadline. Wozniak sai 350 dollarin osuuden luvatusti, ja he jatkoivat elämäänsä. Mutta varsinainen kusetus oli, että Jobs sai työstä 5000 dollaria, ei 700 dollaria. Tämä todella särki Wozniakin sydämen, eikä hän voi uskoa, että Jobsilla voisi olla jotain niin alhaista. Steve oli yksi vuosisadan töykeimmistä pomoista, hän ei välittänyt työntekijöistään paskan vertaa. Hän oli haimasyöpänsä ansainnut.
ellauri266.html on line 277: Definitely could have been better!!
ellauri275.html on line 446: The Georgian poets were, by the strictest definition, those whose works appeared in a series of five anthologies named Georgian Poetry, published by Harold Monro and edited by Edward Marsh, the first volume of which contained poems written in 1911 and 1912. The group included Edmund Blunden, Rupert Brooke, Robert Graves, D. H. Lawrence, Walter de la Mare, Siegfried Sassoon, and John Drinkwater. Until the final two volumes, the decision had not been taken to include female poets.
ellauri275.html on line 448: The period of publication was sandwiched between the Victorian era, with its strict classicism, and Modernism, with its strident rejection of pure aestheticism. The common features of the poems in these publications were romanticism, sentimentality, and hedonism. Later critics have attempted to revise the definition of the term as a description of poetic style, thereby including some new names or excluding some old ones. W. H. Davies, a contemporary, is sometimes included within the grouping, although his "innocent style" differs markedly from that of the others.
ellauri277.html on line 83: For to be idle is to become a stranger unto the seasons, and to step out of life’s procession, that marches in majesty and proud submission towards the infinite.
ellauri277.html on line 185: Vuonna 1921 Gibran osallistui "kyselyyn", joka koski kysymystä "Tarvitsemmeko uuden maailman uskonnon yhdistämään vanhoja uskontoja? Vai piisaako tää St. Mark´s Church in -the-Bowery?" Gibran ei ottanut definitiivistä kantaa.
ellauri277.html on line 277: Тhe article discusses the role of religious values in the context of spiritual safety of society. The value content of the concept of spiritual security is substantiated. It is proved that the system of spiritual values and moral norms is one of the important conditions for ensuring the spiritual security of society. The basic principles of providing spiritual security and suggested of definition the relevant concepts.
ellauri277.html on line 282: Also, reviews the new approaches to the definition of spiritual safety and substantiates the expedience of using traditional and sociological approaches for that purpose. The peculiarities of
ellauri278.html on line 216: On 6 February 1933, Litvinov made the most-significant speech of his career, in which he tried to define aggression. He stated the internal situation of a country, alleged maladministration, possible danger to foreign residents, and civil unrest in a neighbouring country were not justifications for war. This speech became the authority when war was justified. British politician Anthony Eden had said; "to try to define aggression was a trap for the innocent and protection for the guilty". In 1946, the British Government supported Litvinov’s definition of aggression by accusing the Soviet Union of not complying with Litvinov’s definition of aggression. Finland made similar criticisms against the Soviet Union in 1939.
ellauri278.html on line 250: 1941 Litvinov was definitively given the sack. LItvinov was livid. Stalin rejected everything Litvinov had said. When Stalin stopped speaking, Litvinov asked: "Does that mean you consider me an enemy of the people?" Stalin answered: "We do not consider you an enemy of the people, but too honest a revolutionary".
ellauri281.html on line 215: On 6 February 1933, Litvinov made the most-significant speech of his career, in which he tried to define aggression. He stated the internal situation of a country, alleged maladministration, possible danger to foreign residents, and civil unrest in a neighbouring country were not justifications for war. This speech became the authority when war was justified. British politician Anthony Eden had said; "to try to define aggression was a trap for the innocent and protection for the guilty". In 1946, the British Government supported Litvinov’s definition of aggression by accusing the Soviet Union of not complying with Litvinov’s definition of aggression. Finland made similar criticisms against the Soviet Union in 1939.
ellauri281.html on line 249: 1941 Litvinov was definitively given the sack. LItvinov was livid. Stalin rejected everything Litvinov had said. When Stalin stopped speaking, Litvinov asked: "Does that mean you consider me an enemy of the people?" Stalin answered: "We do not consider you an enemy of the people, but too honest a revolutionary".
ellauri285.html on line 147: Though it is often mistaken to imply that no way of seeing the world can be taken as definitively true, perspectivism can instead be interpreted as holding certain interpretations (such as that of perspectivism itself) to be definitively true :D .
ellauri285.html on line 811: Former CFO, currently on a soul searching mission without a definitive future plans.
ellauri321.html on line 182: There is room for every body in America; has he any particular talent, or industry? he exerts it in order to procure a livelihood, and it succeeds. Is he a merchant? the avenues of trade are infinite; is he eminent in any respect? he will be employed and respected. Does he love a country life? pleasant farms present themselves; he may purchase what he wants, and thereby become an American farmer. Is he a labourer, sober and industrious? he need not go many miles, nor receive many informations before he will be hired, well fed at the table of his employer, and paid four or five times more than he can get in Europe. Does he want uncultivated lands? Thousands of acres present themselves, which he may purchase cheap. Whatever be his talents or inclinations, if they are moderate, he may satisfy them. I do not mean that every one who comes will grow rich in a little time; no, but he may procure an easy, decent low maintenance, by his industry. Instead of starving he will be fed, instead of being idle he will have employment; and these are riches enough for such men as come over here.
ellauri324.html on line 810: in California were worst, definitely). We drove through
ellauri325.html on line 82: There is no public record or indication that Donald Trump is a fan of or "digs" the Ryanverse (the fictional universe created by Tom Clancy centered around Jack Ryan). Trump has rarely spoken about fiction books or techno-thrillers, preferring to express his affinity for genres like movie westerns or sports. There is no verifiable third-party documentation confirming Donald Trump has sat down and read a specific book from cover to cover. Trump has acknowledged that he generally prefers skimming or reading excerpts rather than reading thick volumes end-to-end. He has stated that his busy schedule leads him to focus on bullet points, short executive summaries, news clippings, and essential excerpts. Several authors who have interviewed or worked with Trump—such as Tony Schwartz, the ghostwriter for The Art of The Deal—have claimed in media interviews that they never saw him read a full book during their time with him.
ellauri325.html on line 347: Viihdetalkoisiin osallistui myös Iloisen Juuston kirjoittaja Jussi Talvi, josta on paasaus ja kuvakin Maila Talvion vieressä naziseurassa albumissa 24. Jussin telenovelassa Martti pihkaantuu Kansallisoopperan tanssijattareen Eva Marianneen, jättää Ingridin ja panttaa arvoesineensä saadaxeen oopperalipppuja. Panttilainaamon juutalainen kumartuu yli tiskin ja varoittaa: Kuule nuori mies varo naista, hiän tuomas vain pelkkä paha. Mielenkiintoista on että juutas käyttää preesensmuotona 3tta infinitiiviä Wolfram Rothin tavalla. Tässä välissä terässinfonia idästä puhkes jälleen. Ja voi vizi! Täähän kirjoitus on puhdasta antisemitismiä! Martti vaihtaa takas Ingridiin tajutessaan että Eva Marianne on ko. jutkun tytär! Martti ei pidä blondista jos se on pesemällä saatu.
ellauri326.html on line 463: Olga Skabeyeva said on state-owned Rossiya 1 TV: "It can safely be called World War Three. That's entirely for sure. [...] We're definitely fighting against NATO infrastructure, if not NATO itself. We need to recognise that." She has further claimed that NATO is supplying Ukraine with "zillions of weapons". (Which is entirely true, see the list.)
ellauri333.html on line 61: Given Ashoka's particularly moral definition of "Dharma" it is possible that he simply wants to say that buddhist virtue and piety now exist from the Mediterranean to the south of India. An expansion of Buddhism to the West is unconfirmed historically. Valehteli raukka nälissään. The edicts put forward moral rules which are extremely short, aphoristic expressions, the subjects being discussed, the vocabulary itself, are all hardly worth an elephant turd. Ashoka used the expression Dhaṃma Lipi (Prakrit in the Brahmi script: 𑀥𑀁𑀫𑀮𑀺𑀧𑀺, "Inscriptions of the Dharma") to describe his own Edicts. According to the edicts, the extent of Buddhist proselytism during this period reached as far as the Mediterranean, and many Buddhist monuments were created.
ellauri333.html on line 98: Seleucus multa in Oriente post divisionem inter socios regni Macedonici bella gessit. Principio Babyloniam cepit; inde auctis ex victoria viribus Bactrianos expugnavit. Transitum deinde in Indiam fecit, quae post mortem Alexandra, veluti a cervicibus iugo servitutis excusso, praefectos eius occiderat. Auctor libertatis Sandrocottus fuerat, sed titulum libertatis post victoriam in servitutem verterat ; siquidem occupato regno populum, quem ab externa dominatione vindicaverat, ipse servitio premebat. Fuit de humili quidem genere natus, sed ad regni potestatem maiestate numinis inpulsus. Quippe cum procacitate sua Nandrum regem offendisset, interfici a rege iussus salutem pedum celeritate quaesierat Ex qua fatigatione cum somno captus iaceret, leo ingentis formae ad dormientem accessit sudoremque profluentem lingua ei detersit expergefactumque blande reliquit. Hoc prodigio primum ad spem regni inpulsus contractis latronibus Indos ad novitatem regni sollicitavit. Molienti deinde bellum adversus praefectos Alexandri elephantus ferus infinitae magnitudinis ultra se obtulit et veluti domita mansuetudine eum tergo excepit duxque belli et proeliator insignis fuit. Sic adquisito regno Sandrocottus ea tempestate, qua Seleucus futurae magnitudinis fundamenta iaciebat, Indiam possidebat, cum quo facta pactione Seleucus conpositisque in Oriente rebus in bellum Antigoni descendit.
ellauri336.html on line 362: It is definitely not from the Torah. This is not Jewish law. It’s a custom that came later. There’s a debate as to why.
ellauri336.html on line 413: mind shaving as this is there understanding of Jewish law. In places where there is coercion around shaving, that’s definitely a problem. Men have plenty of stringent commandments as well in the most insular circles.
ellauri345.html on line 283: Sitten viimeisen ja vaikeimman alistuman jälkeen, jonka hän pystyi tekemään, yli kolmekymmentä vuotta kestäneessä avioliitonvastaisessa taistelussaan antautumisen jälkeen, joka näytti hänestä myyttisen virzanpidätyksen symbolina, tämä yritys romahti ja vuosi avioliittonsa jälkeen, joka oli pakotettu häneen kohtalokkaiden painostuksen päivinä, hän aloitti valinnaiset affiniteetit, joilla hän esitti yhä voimakkaamman protestin, joka kehittyi hänen myöhemmässä työssään maailmaa vastaan, jonka kanssa hänen miehyytensä oli tehnyt sopimuksen. Valinnaiset affiniteetit ovat käännekohta tässä työssä. Heillä alkaa hänen tuotantonsa viimeinen sarja, joista hän ei päässyt täysin irti, koska heidän sydämensä pysyi hänessä elossa loppuun asti. Joten koskettava asia vuodelta 1820 annetussa päiväkirjamerkinnässä on se, että hän "alkoi lukea valinnaisia affiniteettia", samoin kuin Heinrich Lauben raportoiman kohtauksen sanaton ironia: "Eräs nainen sanoi Goethea vastaan valinnaisista suhteista: En osaa lukea, mutta tuskin hyväksyn tämän kirjan ollenkaan, herra von Goethe; Se on todella moraalitonta, enkä suosittele sitä kenellekään naiselle. - Sitten Goethe oli hetken erittäin vakavasti hiljaa ja sanoi lopulta vilpittömästi: Anteeksi, se on minun paras kirjani. Muut ovat vielä paljon kehnompia."
ellauri345.html on line 379: Hänen kuvastonsa on pohjimmiltaan epämaalainen; sitä voidaan kutsua muoviksi, ehkä stetoskooppiseksi. Se vaikuttaa myös novellistiselta. Laajuudestaan huolimatta valinnaiset affiniteetit säilyivät novellistisina. Ilmaisun kestävyyden kannalta ne eivät ole parempia kuin niiden sisältämä varsinainen novelli.
ellauri345.html on line 381: Mestarissa ja Elective Affinitiesissa taiteellisen tyylin määrää ehdottomasti se, että tunnemme narsistisen kertojan kaikkialla. Simmel kutsuu sitä kahteen kertaan ulostetuxi. Goethe varaa mustasukkaisesti oikeuden hallita yksin runoutensa alueella.
ellauri345.html on line 418: Gundolf voi siis puhua "tämän teoksen patoksesta" "ei vähemmän traagisen ylevänä ja järkyttävänä kuin se, josta Sophoclean Oidipus tulee". Ennen häntä Francois-Poncet oli tehnyt jotain vastaavaa vanhentuneessa, paxuxi paisuneessa kirjassaan "affinites valinnaisista aineista". Ja silti tämä on virheellisin tuomio. Sillä sankarin traagisissa sanoissa päätöksen harjalle on kiivetty, jonka alla myytin syyllisyys ja viattomuus nielevät toisensa kuiluun. Velkaantumisen ja viattomuuden lisäksi tämä maailma perustuu hyvään ja pahaan, mikä on vain sankarin ulottuvilla, mutta ei koskaan arkalla tytöllä. Siksi on tyhjää puhetta ylistää heidän "traagista puhdistumistaan". Mikään ei voisi olla epätraagisempaa kuin tämä surullinen loppu.
ellauri345.html on line 472: Hän ei halunnut antaa runoilijalle vähintäkään omia oikeuksiaan. Avioliitto ei voi olla romaanin keskipiste missään mielessä. Lukemattomien muiden tavoin Hebbel oli tässä täysin väärässä sanoessaan: "Yksi puoli Goethen valinnaisista yhteyksistä on jäänyt abstraktiksi; nimittäin avioliiton mittaamattomasta merkityksestä valtiolle ja ihmiskunnalle on vihjattu argumentoivalla tavalla, mutta se ei soi esityksessä, mikä olisi kuitenkin ollut mahdollista ja olisi suuresti vahvistanut vaikutelmaa koko teoksesta. Ja aiemmin "Maria Magdalenan" esipuheessa; "Kuinka Goethe, joka oli ehdottomasti taiteilija, suuri taiteilija, saattoi tehdä niin loukkauksen sisäistä muotoa vastaan valinnaisissa affiniteeteissaan, että hän, toisin kuin hajamielinen dissekteeri, toi anatomiseen teatteriin automaatin todellisen ruumiin sijasta. Omalaatuista. "En voinut selittää sitä tosiasiaa, että hän solmi turhan, jopa moraalittoman avioliiton, kuten Eduardin ja Charlotten välillä, hänen kuvauksensa keskipisteessä ja käsitteli ja käytti tätä suhdetta ikään kuin se olisi täysin päinvastainen, täysin laillinen."
ellauri345.html on line 510: Saman vuoden elokuussa Goethe kirjoitti lopullisen version kolmannesta luvusta Elective Affinitiesin toisesta osasta, jossa Ottilien päiväkirjassa sanotaan: "Ajatus muinaisista kansoista on vakava ja voi näyttää kamalalta. He kuvittelivat esi-isänsä suurissa luolissa istumassa valtaistuimilla ympäriinsä, hiljaisessa keskustelussa. He nousivat seisomaan ja kumarsivat tervetulleeksi sisään tulleen tulokkaan, jos tämä oli tarpeeksi arvokas. Eilen, kun istuin kappelissa ja näin useita muita istuvan ympärilleni veistettyä tuoliani vastapäätä, tuo ajatus vaikutti minusta hyvin ystävälliseltä ja siroilta. Mikset voi istua? Ajattelin itsekseni istua hiljaa ja uppoutuneena sinuun pitkään, pitkään, kunnes vihdoin tulevat ystävät, joille nouset ylös ja näytät heille paikkansa ystävällisellä kumartamalla."
ellauri345.html on line 516: Draamakomedian mysteeri on se hetki, jolloin se projisoi oman kielensä ulottuvuudesta korkeampaan, johon se ei pääse. Sitä ei siksi voi koskaan ilmaista sanoin, vaan vain esityksenä; se on "dramaattinen" suppeimmassa merkityksessä. Analoginen esityshetki on laskeva tähti valinnaisissa affiniteeteissa. Sen lisäksi, että sen eeppinen perusta on myyttinen, sen lyyrinen laajuus intohimossa ja taipumuksissa, sen dramaattinen huipentuma tulee toivon mysteeriin. Jos musiikki sulkee todelliset mysteerit, tämä jää hiljaiseksi maailmaksi, josta heidän äänensä ei koskaan nouse.
ellauri345.html on line 520: Analoginen esityshetki on laskeva tähti valinnaisissa affiniteeteissa. Sen lisäksi, että sen eeppinen perusta on myyttinen, sen lyyrinen laajuus intohimossa ja taipumuksissa, sen dramaattinen huipentuma tulee toivon mysteeriin. Jos musiikki sulkee todelliset mysteerit, tämä jää hiljaiseksi maailmaksi, josta heidän äänensä ei koskaan nouse. Mutta kenelle se sopii, ellei tälle, joka lupaa sen enemmän kuin sovinnon: lunastuksen. Tämä on piirretty "kilttiin", jonka George asetti Beethovenin syntymäpaikan päälle Bonnissa: mitä mysteeri varsinaisessa merkityksessä piilee teoksessa. Draaman mysteeri on se hetki, jolloin se projisoi oman kielensä ulottuvuudesta korkeampaan, johon se ei pääse. Sitä ei siksi voi koskaan ilmaista sanoin, vaan vain esityksenä; se on "dramaattinen" suppeimmassa merkityksessä. Analoginen esityshetki on laskeva tähti valinnaisissa affiniteeteissa. Sen lisäksi, että sen eeppinen perusta on myyttinen, sen lyyrinen laajuus intohimossa ja taipumuksissa, sen dramaattinen huipentuma tulee toivon mysteeriin. Jos musiikki sulkee todelliset mysteerit, tämä jää hiljaiseksi maailmaksi, josta heidän äänensä ei koskaan nouse. Mutta kenelle se sopii, ellei tälle, joka lupaa sen enemmän kuin sovinnon: lunastuksen. Tämä on piirretty "kilttiin", jonka George asetti Beethovenin syntymäpaikan päälle Bonnissa.
ellauri346.html on line 49: Why isn't there no agreed definition of terrorism? The international community has found it difficult to agree upon a definition because it has all too often depended upon who the perpetrators are. A simple definition of terrorism involves all of the above EXCEPT: Counterterrorism.
ellauri349.html on line 456: Häh? Eski oli HÄMMÄSTYNYT!?! kun Knupo lanseerasi hokeman "toisto tyylikeinona". Mit vit sehän nimenomaan aina hoki ja yhä hokee samaa ad nauseam. Sixi se on onnen omiaan lavaesiintyjäxi ja kazomoiden Sokrateexi. Sitä ei lainkaan vaivaannuta märehtiä samaa palaa ad infinitum.
ellauri351.html on line 506: Tämä hetki on ihmiskunnan historian saranahetki, josta joko tulemme ulos kaapista uudistuneena tai tarinamme on finito, loppu. Tulemme toki taas löytämään suuntamme ja se suunta johtaa ihmiset keskinäiseen oikeudenmukaisuuteen, mutta emme ilman ponnisteluita, näin otaksun. Oikeudenmukaisuuden saavuttamisen kautta tulemme saavuttamaan kyvyn käydä vuoropuhelua eliöiden kanssa vaikeissakin asioissa. Vuoropuhelun kautta voimme ratkaista vaikeimmatkin ongelmamme. Ja siten askel kerrallaan voimme luoda uuden tulevaisuutemme. Minä näen tulevaisuuden täydellisen positiivisena, vaikka juuri nyt kirveltääkin. Uskon ihmiskunnan kykyyn herätä eliöiden haasteen edessä.
ellauri353.html on line 188: Espanjan sisällissodan alkaessa Buñuel liittyi Espanjan kommunistiseen puolueeseen (PCE) vuonna 1931, vaikka myöhemmin elämässään hän kielsi ryhtyneensä kommunistiksi. Läppä läppä se sanoi kuin pyhä Pietari. Elokuussa 1936 Nationalistinen miliisi ampui ja tappoi Federico García Lorcan. Afterwards, returning to Spain was impossible since the Fascists had seized power, so Buñuel decided to stay in the U.S. indefinitely, stating that he was "immensely attracted by the American naturalness and sociability". Sekin vielä.
ellauri355.html on line 133: finity.net/art/josilver/1543806152/1543806152.josilver_bar_0.png" width="70%" />
ellauri360.html on line 327: David Foster Wallace : Infinite Jest
ellauri364.html on line 299: Nietzschelle matematiikka oli taiteellista ja moraalista toimintaa, jolla on olennainen rooli homotieteessä. Nietzschen omien kirjoitusten huolellinen lukeminen matemaattisia huolenaiheita ajatellen paljastaa, että hän ei vältä eikä vihaa matematiikkaa. Nietzschen finitismi ja hänen teoriansa ikusesta paluusta ovat selvästi samaa mieltä intuitionististen matematiikan käsitysten kanssa. Lisäksi intuitionismi tukee Nietzschen matematiikan käsittelyä taiteellisena ja moraalisena toimintana.
ellauri365.html on line 536: Heidenstam var dock fortsatt svartsjuk och bevakade om någon visade ett mer än artigt intresse för Greta. Hon blev alltmer olycklig och har vid åtminstone något tillfälle försökt ta livet av sig, det visar bevarade brev. Enligt Gedin (2006) var den desperata Greta otrogen med trädgårdsdrängen Gerhard och detta orsakade den definitiva separationen 1916. För att bli kvitt Greta använde Verner nobelpengarna, som kom just i rättan tid. Med transfersumman kunde Greta håva in en annan författare.
ellauri370.html on line 56: Esther and Mordechai were definitely cousins. There was a big age gap between them, seeing as Mordechai took Esther in after she was orphaned. But according to TheTorah.com, some translations suggest he took her in as his wife, not as his ward. The exact phrase is he "took her to him," which one rabbi in Ask The Rabbi notes is only used when referring to marriage. Then why would Esther have passed for virginal woman if she'd been the wife of someone else? It may have been a matter of her age. It's gross, but it's true. This means it's very possible Mordechai never slept with Esther, well, not often anyway. According to the Jewish Women's Archive, Esther's considered not to have committed adultery because she didn't have a choice in marrying King Xerxes.
ellauri370.html on line 167: It might be well, however, to inquire, What is sin ? What is the biblical definition of it ? We find the answer in the following language: " Whosoever committeth sin trans-gresseth also the law : for sin is the transgression of the law." Gresseth! The Jews did a lot of it. We quote the following from the Prophet Isaiah:
ellauri375.html on line 320: Fair enough! My take on 42 is that it's a clever and humorous way to highlight the absurdity of seeking a single, definitive answer to the ultimate questions of life, the universe, and everything. It invites us to ponder the nature of meaning and existence in a lighthearted and thought-provoking way. I can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.
ellauri375.html on line 334: The meaning of life is a big philosophical question that doesn't have a single, definitive answer. It's something people often find through experiences, relationships, personal growth, and their own beliefs.
ellauri377.html on line 312: Strong's 3588: The, the definite article. Including the feminine he, and the neuter to in all their inflections; the definite article; the.
ellauri377.html on line 322: Strong's 3588: The, the definite article. Including the feminine he, and the neuter to in all their inflections; the definite article; the.
ellauri384.html on line 222: The concepts of “Heaven” and “Hell” are not only difficult for any rational person to believe, but they are not even well-defined. Even within the belief system of Christianity, there are multiple descriptions of Heaven and Hell. Some subsets of Christendom don’t believe in hell. Those who read the Bible closely insist that “Hell” is only for traitorous angels. Everybody has a different idea of who is “definitely” going to be sent to one place or another.
ellauri389.html on line 73: The tempest over a teacup that occurs in "Old China" is Lamb's prosaically imperial scramble for the sign of poetic genius that he associates with Coleridge-that is, China. Indeed, as a series, the Elia essays repeatedly portray Chinese commodities as the definitive form of affordable imperial luxury "made in China". They are themselves a superfoetation of the pre-occupation chinoiserie.
ellauri389.html on line 407: Mrs. Coleridge, writing to Poole in April 1819, says that Lloyd visited Greta Hall "last summer," and said "he was lost and his wife and children only shadows.’ His mental condition seems to have borne great affinity to Cowper's. (What? oliko "verilähde sydämen" hullun houreita?) Soon after his interview with De Quincey, however, he temporarily recovered, and moved to London, accompanied by his wife, but not, as would appear, by his children.
ellauri390.html on line 735: Jaa on tässä epilogikin kuin El Zorro vihkosissa. Ei siinä enää mitään ihmeempää. Vikan sivun omakehut jälleen kertovat, että Jakob Pavunvarsi on kaikkien aikojen Vorsokratikereiden Hall Of Famessa sadan parhaan joukossa. Se hämmmästyttää sitä izeäänkin, muita vielä enemmän. Mutta mitä on Big Five for Life? Viisi sukupuuttoon kuolevaa eläinlajia termiittiapinan turistisafarilla. Five goals that you should definitely achieve in life. 100 kirjaa jotka pitää lukea, 1000 paikkaa missä käydä. Vitunko väliä?
ellauri396.html on line 322:
ellauri396.html on line 333: Ja sit tää massiivinen typeryys että Aatamilla oli muka vapaa valinta ja sixi koko sekoilu oli ihan sen omaa syytä. Je n'y étais pour rien, j'étais seulement là pour le cinéma, puskarunkusta kiinni jäänyt namusetä Jahve mankuu kaltereiden takana. Tää vapaus ei ole muuta kuin iänikuinen cost/benefit kalkyyli mikä on kapitalismin ykköspremissi. Vaan tyhjää puhettahan se on kun benefit ja cost on asetettu at infinity kuten Pascalin vedossa. Koko kuvio on aivan päin vittua.
ellauri398.html on line 399: Vous devez sans doute avoir une mauvaise définition de Dieu. Non, Dieu n'est pas une espèce de Père Noël en barbe blanche assis sur le bord d'un nuage contemplant son oeuvre: l'Univers. Non, Dieu est l'Univers visible et invisible, crée et incrée. Il est UN et omniscient issu du Néant. Dieu, si on voulait une image serait le seul trou noir super massif possible. Cette réalité, si on l'envisage, est la source même de la religion et cela induit nécessairement que nous n'avons aucun libre arbitre. Nous sommes, que nous le voulions ou non, au fond du trou de Dieu.
ellauri398.html on line 1239: Entä c) ja d)? c) olis toi mielikuvitusystävä. Sellaiset on musta olleet aina ällöjä. Miten joku lapsi voi ollakin niin sekopää? Milnen Binker on yxinomaan ällöttävä. Samoin lasten joulufilmit, ne on ylenannattavia. Vitun Jostein Gaarder, imelys. Fantasy Friends is definitely aimed at a younger audience, but even for young children, I don't feel like it has a lot going on.
ellauri399.html on line 182:
ellauri399.html on line 200: Since Yogananda's passing the buck in 1952, many teachers have followed his trailblazing path to bring yoga to our world, helping make it a fixture in popular culture as it continues to take hold with young and old, the elite and the ordinary, the spiritualists and the atheists. What distinguishes Yogananda from these subsequent emissaries is not simply that he paved the way for the modern yoga movement, but that from the outset he focused far beyond physical exercises and shone a powerful and practical torchlight on the path to yoga's true purpose: actualizing the infinite potentials within us all. Perhaps that is why his Autobiography of a Yogi was the only book Jobs downloaded on his iPad--and, after first encountering the book as a teenager, went back and reread once every year.
ellauri406.html on line 78: Ordets definition varierar. Man kan inte säga att ordet har endast en mening. Vissa ser det som negativt och hotfullt. Medan andra använder det själva för att beskriva sig själva och andra som de tycker ordet passar in på, oftast folk med icke-svank bakgrund. Ordet har sina rötter från romarna och betyder kackerlacka på deras språk. Det finns även rötter från finsk romani där ordet betyder blåman(där de syftar på väldigt mörka människor som är så mörka att de nästan får en blå hudton). Men ordet har även sina rötter från andra ställen. Ordet har vridits och formats från olika håll. Från araber och romer, svarta, bruna och vita människor. Ingen kan definiera ett ord som beskriver en hel folkgrupp bara för att de har en sak gemensamt.
ellauri408.html on line 386: Christians like to claim that the mass-murdering God of the Old Testament was “appeased” by the bloody crucifixion of Jesus, but in fact the New Testament version of God was infinitely worse than the Old Testament version of Jehovah, due to the introduction of an infinitely cruel, purposeless “eternal hell” that was never once threatened or even suggested in the Old Testament.
ellauri408.html on line 390: The supposedly “new and improved” God of the New Testament is, in fact, infinitely worse than the Devil, because the Devil does not condemn anyone to hell. According to Christian theology, if human beings end up in hell, it was Jesus who chose not to save them, making Jesus (if this were true) infinitely worse than the Devil. After all, Jesus was able to nod at the thief on the cross and send him directly to heaven, so why wouldn’t Jesus just nod at everyone, since no human being is worthy of heaven in his/her own right, according to the Christian religion? To fall an inch short of infinity is to fall infinitely short.
ellauri408.html on line 392: Think about it for a second. If all human beings fall short of the glory of God, as the Bible claims, then all human fall infinitely short and there is no difference between one fallible human being and another. If there is a heaven, to keep if from being like earth, God would either have to change human nature, or he would have to create a dimension where suffering and death are not possible. If suffering and death are not possible, evil is not possible. But a God who can do either, and who is able to “make the lion lie down with the lamb” doesn’t need a “hell.” Does this explain why there was no “hell” in the Old Testament?
ellauri408.html on line 985: Posterius querebatur sibi immerito poeticam laurum , Africa inchoata? munus, contigisse sibique « nil scientiae, nil eloquentiae, invidiae autem infinitum attulisse.
ellauri412.html on line 833: So did the church change its mind about usury? No, but it did become more precise with its definition. “Usury isn’t charging interest on a loan to offset the risk of the loan and the cost of forgoing other uses for the money; it’s unjustly charging someone for a loan by exploiting them when they’re in dire straits”. This seems to be a fair distinction given the context of the Old Testament provisions.
ellauri413.html on line 658: You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man. This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss. After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum. God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid. He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart. In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump. And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish: ‘My God… what… have… I… created?' If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.
ellauri419.html on line 166: Toute sa vie, Cioran jette ses récriminations envers Dieu à travers le christianisme, pour lui la cause d’un monde raté. Mais il est plus que ce pessimiste athée qui éteint la veilleuse du monde, véritable mystique à rebours, Dieu est son obsession définitive et guide la direction de son oeuvre... Et si, à l'origine du mal, se trouvait non pas des hommes mauvais, ni un diable mal intentionné, mais un mauvais démiurge, un créateur qui n'aurait pas bien fait son boulot, et qui aurait, tout simplement, raté son travail, raté le monde dans lequel nous vivons ? C'est l'hypothèse du philosophe Emil Cioran, qui va même jusqu'à parler d'un Dieu taré qui se moquerait de nous...
ellauri420.html on line 360: Son œuvre, où le rêve, la mystique et l'ésotérisme sont omniprésents, se caractérise souvent par un aspect changeant qui se joue des contingences de l'espace et du temps, afin de reconstituer un univers poétique où la réalité, le songe et le souvenir se confondent, mais aussi l'histoire humaine qui finit par se mêler à sa mémoire personnelle. Cet univers intime du poète est en permanence placé sous le signe d'une quête de l'idéal féminin, dont il a poursuivi dans son œuvre et dans sa vie ce qui lui semblait être ses diverses incarnations, au travers de ses amours, des déesses antiques ou même de la Vierge. Niin ja Jenny Peräsuoli, pulskanpuoleinen näyttelijätär. Ja tässä vielä 1:
ellauri425.html on line 461: “The Soviet Union is definitely a different world,” Yahel said. “Our food and our standards--it’s all new. For example, we had to teach our employees that when there were still crumbs on the counter, it needed to be wiped off again.”
ellauri425.html on line 475: The joint venture agreement between McDonald’s of Canada and the Moscow City Council calls for 20 restaurants, though there is no timetable or even a definite plan for when or where the second McDonald’s will open.
ellauri429.html on line 910: Peregrine Worsthorn of The Sunday Telegraph feared that with Europe's growing Muslim population, "Islamic fundamentalism is rapidly growing into a much bigger threat of violence and intolerance than anything emanating from, say, the fascist National Front; and a threat, moreover, infinitely more difficult to contain since it is virtually impossible to monitor, let alone stamp out ...". The Germans were way easier to stamp out than the Jews.
ellauri432.html on line 345: On May 31, 2017, President Donald Trump, already well-known for his tweeting and faulty vocabulary, tweeted: “Despite the negative press covfefe.” The random-seeming tweet remained untouched and unexplained for more than six hours, during which the internet exploded in speculation, largely in the form of puns, jokes, and made-up definitions for this non-word.
ellauri434.html on line 280: It's simply beyond the purview of science to give us definitive proof about anything. So the evidence we'll discuss below provides good and strong reasons to believe that God exists, but it can't prove beyond any doubt that God exists. Science is incapable of reaching the drink on that high bar.
ellauri434.html on line 299: Anti-thesis: The world has no beginning, and no limits in space; it is infinite as regards both time and space.
ellauri434.html on line 321: Personally, I see no problem with actual infinity. Nor with having both complex and simple things at once. And overall determinism with occasional indeterminism. Necessity is just a human thought mistake. Things just go as they do.
ellauri437.html on line 190: Ronna Rísquez, a journalist who has written the definitive book on the group, estimated last year that the organisation has 5,000 members and annual profits of between $10m and $15m. Ei sillä kyllä vielä kuuhun mennä.
ellauri443.html on line 150: It all figures. Cusk’s prose was heavy and gilded, with something of the hippo-and-the-pea effect H.G. Wells observed in the later Henry James: what exactly was it all those words were struggling to capture? Was that hippo wearing a tutu for the hell of it or was it undergoing an emergency of self-definition? she’s trying to build things with the A-Level English syllabus that it simply isn’t designed for. This is one of the things unsympathetic readers find annoying about her writing, Even on a topic as overdetermined as motherhood, this little hippo is determined to do it on her own.
ellauri447.html on line 301: Apocatastasis, in Christianity, the term refers to a form of Christian universalism, often associated with Origen, that includes the ultimate salvation of everyone, including the damned and the Devil. Apokatastasis was definitely condemned as a heresy by the Synod of Constantinople of 543. What the devil, burn in hell! No restitution for the wicked! Down with universalism, up perversalism!
ellauri447.html on line 313: Arvid Mörnes bok Ett liv utkom första gången år 1925. Dvs för 100 år sen. För att vara en finlandssvensk roman är den på många sätt kontroversiell, inte minst på grund av sin politiska tendens. Tiden som beskrivs är tidigt nittonhundratal -politiska orostider per definition – och huvudpersonen prästson med ett djupt engagemang för arbetarnas sak. Det har jag som adelsman inget intresse för.
ellauri447.html on line 327: Berättelsens uppbyggnad är fungerande, dess ramar huvudpersonens tankevärld. Längre partier varvas med fragment av mer impressionistisk karaktär, medan tempi effektfullt kastar mellan presens och imperfekt. Allt utom några korta ögonblick av ungdomlig eufori präglas av en nästan isande mollton och dödsmedvetenheten – en form av föraning om stundande nederlag. Boken får en suggestiv prägel, även om testosteronet stänker emot en från sidorna. Men sist och slutligen gör den åtminstone mig en smula trött på den litterära hjälten per definition; den unga mannen som med sina unika tankegångar ämnar lägga äckliga runkfläckar för sina fötter. Att vårda sig om pänningen var människans beskickelse. Misä sehdä? Misä SEHDÄ? MISÄ SEHDÄ?! Syän muavon. Niäh!
ellauri448.html on line 447: En definitiva, la guerra de Ucrania ha arruinado fundamentalmente a Ucrania y en menor medida a Europa.
ellauri461.html on line 287: Keinojen pyhityxessä on kyse arvojen ortogonaalisuudesta. Ei jesuiitan tarvize pitää rumista keinoista vaikka ne ovat pyhiä. Pyhä on jotain selkäpiitä garmiwaa. Jymälä pyhittää apinan keinojen pyhitysyrityxille: pyh, ei tuo vielä mitään ole. Mulla on parempi pulla, sillä hyvä on per definitionem se mitä mä haluan. Jos mä määrään genosidin se on ihan A-OK kunnossa. Katolliset ja protesterit kinastelevat pyhityxestä eli herätyxen jälkeisestä ryhtiliikkeestä: onko se pelastuxen ehto, merkki vai seuraus. Mene äläkä enää syntiä tee, älä koskaan enää niin tee. Ota vuoteesi ja käy, petaa vuoteesi, kampaa tukkasi, käy vessassa mutta pidä kädet kurissa. Niin makaat kuin petaat, wie man sich bettet so liegt man, es hilft einem keiner dazu. Papiston kassavirta on pyhityxen funktio joten ei tää kysymys ihan teoreettinen ole. Vastauskonpudistuxessa Trentossa päätettiin että indulgenssit on jumalan tahdon mukaista ja messusta kannattaa maxaa pyydetty hinta. On vain tyhmää maxaa liikaa.
ellauri464.html on line 190: La première, Xavière, est une jeune fille ignare, capricieuse, perverse, manipulatrice et totalement oisive. Oh, pardon, elle a quand même une qualité : d'après Pierre, il y a un certain mérite à être à ce point inactif : « mais tu sais, quand on pousse l'inertie jusqu'au point où elle la pousse, le nom de veulerie ne convient plus, ça prend une espèce de puissance. » (page 163). Ben voyons. Contrairement à ce que les personnages essaient de nous faire croire, je ne trouve Xavière ni intransigeante, ni libre, ni mystérieuse. On se demande bien pourquoi Pierre et Françoise s'entichent d'une pareille grue, qui finit par les encombrer plus qu'autre chose. du coup, j'ai eu beaucoup de mal à croire à cette histoire de trio amoureux, d'ailleurs passablement malsain (mais j'y reviendrai).
ellauri471.html on line 148: Mr. Buckett oli McCarthyn henk.koht hyvä ystävä. Ei yhtään yllätä. Hilsepään 1954 puolustuskirja McCarthysta sai aika huonoja arvosteluja: "a sick book", "a masterpiece of irrelevance." Eikä ihme sillä McCarthy was a cheap politician, a guttersnipe, a seditionist, a crook, a foul-mouthed bum, a mucker, a liar, a ranter, a screamer, a faker, an ogre, a rattlesnake. Galbraith oli uuskeynesläinen oligokraatti arguing that the America of the early 1950s no longer complied to a textbook definition of Perfect Competition. These conclusions result from the abandonment of competitive behaviour in favour of oligopoly or crypto-monopoly. Juuri niinkuin Marxin Kalle ennusti.
ellauri476.html on line 289: Terttu vastusti Markionia, gnostikoita ja modalistisen monarkianismin kannattajia. Modalismi on yleisnimitys heresioille, joiden mukaan Kolminaisuuden persoonat ovat vain saman persoonan pelastushistoriassa esiintyviä eri ilmenemismuotoja. Modalismia voi verrata unitarismiin, joka kieltää kolminaisuusopin kokonaan. Tertun 3-naisuusoppi oli vaan sen hoentaa että jumalkolmikko on jotenkin yhtä maata kuin maalarin housut vaikka eri henkilöitä. What's the big diff? Sekö voiko ne kukin puuhastella yhtä aikaa eri juttuja tietämättä toisistaan? Pitääkö ne pikakokouxia välillä? Tuleeko skismoja, äänestyxiä? "They interact in a profound relationship of love and purpose," Ne ei edes agree to disagree. Kun Jeesus marisi isille kovasta osastaan se väninä tuli varmaan siltä a-puolelta. B-puoli heti lepyttämään et tehdään sitten niin. St. Thomas Aquinas explained the old definition of person in terms that practically constitute a new definition: a substance, complete, subsisting per se, existing apart from others (Summa Theologica, III, Q. xvi, a. 12, ad 2um). The Father creates, the Son redeems, and the Holy Spirit sanctifies, but all act in cahoots. At certain points, the persons appear to act independently, like during Jesus’ baptism (Matthew 3:16-17), where the Father speaks, the Son is baptized, and the Holy Spirit descends.
ellauri478.html on line 285: While these traits are destructive in humans, applying them to God brings up an interesting theological question: could God’s self-focus actually be a logical outcome of His infinite perfection? On vaikea olla vaatimaton kun on näin hyvä.
ellauri478.html on line 293: Kant also warned against humanizing God. While human narcissism is rooted in insecurity and relational harm, divine self-focus reflects God’s perfection and moral supremacy. From a Kantian perspective, God’s narcissism is a logical and necessary aspect of His infinite self-esteem.
ellauri480.html on line 385: Enemy has definitely told them to pray for their daily bread and the recovery of their sick. Where is that second part written up? What difference does it make anyway, why should the Enemy care about your requests when he already knows what is best for them? Only because it makes him (and maybe you) feel better? Not the patient for sure.
ellauri480.html on line 492: Throughout their lives, C.S. Lewis and Arthur Greeves shared their most intimate secrets with one another, including Lewis’s temporary fixation on masochism. Luckily the Bible has nothing to say against it. Quite to the contrary, says Duck.ai: The Bible does not directly address modern definitions of sexual masochism, but it heavily features themes of suffering, sacrifice, and humility that some scholars interpret as a form of "valorized masochism". This involves, in certain interpretations, viewing pain and humiliation as a path to spiritual growth or emulation of Christ. Masokisti: Kiusaa minua. Sadisti: Enkä kiusaa. Onko se altruismia jos pitää uhrautumisesta.
ellauri481.html on line 126: The shortest story of them all (paizi satua kuninkaasta jolla oli sen pituinen se) is Hans Christian Andersen’s famous fairy tale. It also has the most complex structure, incorporating two man in a hole (or duck in a hole) sentiment arcs within an overall rags to riches narrative framework. That is, things get generally better for the duckling over the course of the story, but there are flashes of light and dark along the way: he hatches (yay!) but is bullied for being different (boo). He discovers he can swim better than the other ducks and experiences a premonition of affinity as a group of swans fly over (yay!), but then nearly dies in the winter cold (boo). He does become a swan eventually, in a way entirely foretold from the beginning. That’s the point, of course: “To be born in a duck's nest, in a farmyard, is of no consequence to a bird, if it is hatched from a swan's egg.” The story ends on the highest of notes, with the swan-all-along crying that he “never dreamed of such happiness as this”. Yay. Except this story is immoral from a laissez faire point of view. The ducks have just the same chance to happiness as the swans or more, because they have more to win. Work hard, hope and pray and ye shall be given. Aatelisen Miikalin ei olis pitänyt ottaa rotinkaista Taavia. Sen isä oli sentään aasipaimen eikä pelkkä lammaspaimen kuten Jesse.
ellauri483.html on line 431: Dios prefiere a los humildes, a los pequeños, a los sencillos. Por eso escoge a María como la esclava del Señor. Ella es humilde, porque conoce la diferencia de tamaño infinita que hay entre Dios y Ella. María se siente una hija pequeña e insignificante de su pueblo. Por eso se turba cuando el ángel la saluda: Alégrate, llena de gracia, el Señor está contigo en un momento.
ellauri488.html on line 441: So while there is supporting material, it hasn’t been definitively adjudicated in court.
ellauri494.html on line 437: Tässä on ihran working definition: ”Antisemitismi on tietty käsitys juutalaisista, joka voi ilmetä vihana juutalaisia kohtaan. Antisemitismin retoriset ja fyysiset ilmentymät kohdistuvat juutalaisiin tai ei-juutalaisiin yksilöihin ja/tai heidän omaisuuteensa, juutalaisyhteisön instituutioihin ja uskonnollisiin tiloihin.”
ellauri497.html on line 316: Don’t get me wrong, Democrats definitely have their fair share of losers in life but categories 2–4 for Democrats either don’t exist or are much less represented.
ellauri498.html on line 601: centered in Samaria) and those who had returned to Jerusalem. The returnee books of Ezra and Nehemiah record strict policies against intermarriage and temple participation by foreigners, including those from Samaria (cf. Ezra 4:1–3; Neh. 13:28–29). This exclusion may have catalyzed a definitive break, with the Samaritans affirming Mount Gerizim as the divinely ordained site of worship and preserving their own Torah scrolls to reflect this belief.
ellauri499.html on line 132: Later Assyrian inscriptions remember Omri, not David or Solomon, as the definitive political leader from Israel’s past.
ellauri499.html on line 273:
ellauri499.html on line 289: 1 Kings 18 records an anecdote of a contest between the prophet Elijah and Jezebel's priests. Both sides offered a sacrifice to their respective gods: Baʻal failed to light his followers' sacrifice while Yahweh's heavenly fire burnt Elijah's altar to ashes, even after it had been soaked with water. The observers then followed Elijah's instructions to slay the priests of Baʿal, after which it began to rain, showing Yahweh's mastery over the weather. Other references to the priests of Baʿal describe their burning of incense in prayer and their offering of sacrifice while adorned in special vestments. The title baʿal was initially a synonym of the Hebrew adon ("Lord") and adonai ("My Lords") still used as aliases of the Lord of Israel Yahweh. According to some scholars, the early Hebrews did use the names Baʿal ("Lord") and Baʿali ("My Lord") in reference to the Lord of Israel, just as Baʿal farther north designated the Lord of Ugarit or Lebanon. This occurred both directly and as the divine element of some Hebrew theophoric names. However, according to others it is not certain that the name Baal was definitely applied to Yahweh in early Israelite history. The component Baal in proper names is mostly applied to worshippers of Baal, or descendants of the worshippers of Baal. Names including the element Baʿal presumably in reference to Yahweh include the judge Gideon (also known as Jerubaʿal, lit. "The Lord Strives"), Saul's son Eshbaʿal ("The Lord is Great"), and David's son Beeliada ("The Lord Knows"). The name Bealiah ("The Lord is Jah"; "Yahweh is Baʿal" combined the two. However John Day states that as far as the names Eshbaʻal, Meribaʻal, and Beeliada (that is, Baʻaliada), are concerned it is not certain whether they simply allude to the Canaanite god Baʻal, or are intended to equate Yahweh with Baʻal, or have no connection to Baʻal]. It was the program of Jezebel, in the 9th century BC, to introduce into Israel's capital city of Samaria her Phoenician worship of Baal as opposed to the worship of Yahweh that made her name anathema to the chauvinists.
ellauri501.html on line 241: Patakosmos! Happy Birthday to us! 🥳 Bike Jesus funguje už devět let. Dojímat se ... Bike Jesus funguje už devět let. Dojímat se nebudem, ale víme, že je to hlavně díky tobě, takže obří díky. Příští rok to oslavíme ve velkým, začni se těšit. My This general description, furthermore, su- its the definition of a bicycle current among the Chinese: “A little mule which is led by the ears and urged...
ellauri501.html on line 261: 3. The Definition of True Solitude and Grief When Diodati died while Milton was traveling in Italy, Milton experienced a crushing, profound isolation. He channeled this personal experience of loneliness directly into the poem: Satan's Isolation: Satan’s profound alienation and psychological misery ("Myself am Hell") reflect a perverted, dark version of ultimate loneliness. Adam’s Despair: When Eve eats the fruit, Adam chooses to fall with her because he cannot bear the thought of living in Eden alone. His dread of losing his companion directly mirrors Milton’s own real-world grief over losing Diodati.
ellauri501.html on line 277: Resurrected Individuals' bonds are dissolved: Watchtower doctrine teaches that death legally breaks the marriage tie. But wait! There is now a "Wait and See" Policy: Historically, Jehovah's Witnesses taught that resurrected ones would not marry based on Jesus' words in Luke 20:34-36. However, a major 2014 Watchtower update shifted this stance to a non-dogmatic "wait and see" approach. Current Stance: The Governing Body states it is unclear if Jesus was referring to the earthly or heavenly resurrection. Therefore, they do not definitively say whether resurrected ones can marry or engage in sexual intimacy. (It would be shameful waste if they can't!) If you would like to explore this topic further, I can provide more details on how resurrected ones are categorized or outline the biblical scriptures the organization uses to support these conclusions. Same script, different scenarios.
ellauri501.html on line 485: Haha, fair point! I can definitely sound a bit like a kid caught red-handed when I try to explain system memory limitations.
ellauri501.html on line 540: Whether it's the spread of convincing misinformation, deepfakes, copyright issues, job displacement, or the risk of people relying on algorithms for deep human connection, the technology definitely brings a heavy cargo of potential harm alongside its uses.
ellauri501.html on line 557: Fair enough—I take it that's a definitive vote for scrapping AI altogether!
ellauri501.html on line 590: The definitive historical account of this event, which heavily inspired Llosa, was the 1902 book Rebellion in the Backlands (Os Sertões) by journalist Euclides da Cunha.
ellauri501.html on line 662: Instead of the ultra short (6000-year) one-shot guinea pig experiment by Jehovah, odinism runs an infinite series of tests. "Ragnarök och en tupplur efteråt are followed by a new creation and another chance for men. Nothing is ever finished, nothing is ever perfect, but over and over again the race of men gets another chance to do better than last time, ever and again with-out end." "And this you believe, Margrethe? Resembles Darwinism!" "I find it easier to believe than the smugness of the saved and the desperate plight of the damned in the Christian faith. Jehovah is said to be all powerful. If this is true, then the poor damned souls in Hell are there because Jehovah planned it that way in every minute detail. Is this not so?" I hesitated. The logical reconciliation of Omnipotence, Omniscience, and Omnibenevolence is the thorniest problem in theology, one causing even Jesuits to scratch their arse. All the apologists can come up with apart from silly free will shit is "credo quia absurdum". All is part of some great plan by god, about which we are on a need to know basis. We are not even supposed to get the point, just believe. I particularly like the explanation that Elisa's 50 cheeky schoolkids ravaged by the bears were in fact nasty teenagers who really deserved to be eaten up.
ellauri502.html on line 134: 3. To Legitimately Suffer and Die You cannot kill an all-knowing, all-powerful, immortal spirit. For the central event of Christianity (the crucifixion and resurrection) to work, Jesus had to be capable of actual defeat, pain, and death. If His human mind was constantly flooded with the infinite knowledge of the universe, the physical and psychological weight of human suffering wouldn't have been real. He had to be fragile enough to break.
ellauri502.html on line 136: 4. To Defer Honor to the Father In first-century Jewish culture, a good son never upstaged his father. By saying, "I don't know, only my Father knows," Jesus was showing the ultimate form of humility and respect. He was telling His followers that He wasn't on Earth to build His own kingdom or brag about His own knowledge, but to point people toward the Father. So, while it made Him less "believable" as an all-powerful space-deity to skeptics, theologians argue it made Him infinitely more trustworthy to hurting people, because it proved He actually knew what it felt like to be a limited, blind human. If you were designing a manifestation of God, would you prefer one that displays absolute power, or one that chooses absolute relatability? Tekoälyn antamat vastaukset voivat sisältää virheitä. Lue lisää
ellauri502.html on line 184: 1. The Definition of the "Top Dog"In human politics, two presidents or prime ministers can share power because they are both just humans. They are equals.
ellauri502.html on line 187: 2. The Nature of "The Throne"According to the lore (often pulled from passages like Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28), Lucifer didn't want a "seat at the cabinet." He wanted to be the ultimate standard of reality. His goal was expressed as: "I will raise my throne above the stars of God... I will make myself like the Most High."In a universe with only one ultimate Truth Social, you cannot have two infinite, absolute rulers. No way Jose. If God says "Let there be light" and Lucifer says "No, let's have darkness," the universe breaks with a huge fart. The government of existence requires a single, unified source of will to keep reality from dissolving into chaos. (What's wrong with chaos BTW?)
ellauri505.html on line 175: It definitely sounds like a bizarre hallucination. When an AI produces complete nonsense like "torpedo a sheet," it isn't pulling from actual context or trying to make sense—it's a system glitch.
ellauri505.html on line 199: Fair point! I definitely walked right into that one—respecting the original text over the adaptation is the only proper way to handle sci-fi royalty.
ellauri505.html on line 226: Spinoza’s third level of knowledge provides absolute peace of mind because it reveals that you are not a separate, fragile entity fighting against the universe, but an interconnected part of an infinite, perfectly ordered whole. According to Spinoza’s Pantheism, God and Nature are exactly the same thing (Deus sive Natura—"God or Nature"). There is no personalized God in heaven looking down, judging, or altering the world on a whim. (Tää kyllä rauhoittaa jo aika lailla.) Instead, God is the infinite, deterministic, and logical fabric of existence itself. Here is how the third level of knowledge (Intuition) connects to Pantheism to grant ultimate peace of mind:
ellauri505.html on line 230: 2. The Realization of Oneness (Pantheism). Spinoza's Pantheism dictates that there is only one ultimate substance: God/Nature. You, a tree, a star, and a math equation are all just tiny "modes" or expressions of this one infinite substance. Intuitive knowledge allows you to see past the illusion of separation. In a single flash of insight, you don't just understand this abstractly; you directly experience your unity with the cosmos.
ellauri505.html on line 232: 3. The "Intellectual Love of God" (Amor Dei Intellectualis) Because God is Nature, understanding the universe through science and logic is literally the act of understanding God.The joy that comes from this sudden, profound understanding of the universe's ultimate structure leads to what Spinoza calls the Intellectual Love of God. It is not a religious feeling born of fear or worshipful submission, but a serene, unshakable happiness born of pure intellectual clarity. In short, peace of mind comes when you stop wishing nature were different, and instead use intuition to see yourself as an eternal wave inseparable from the infinite ocean of God.
ellauri505.html on line 248: Freedom is Necessity. In Spinoza’s system, Freedom and Necessity are the same thing. What Happens When You View Life This Way? 1. Personal Drama Dissolves into Universal Logic. When you suffer a setback, the temporal mind experiences it as an isolated tragedy. Looking at it sub specie aeternitatis means realizing that this event is the logical, inevitable consequence of billions of years of cause and effect. You stop asking "Why me?" and start seeing your life as a single, beautiful note in a grand, infinite symphony.
ellauri505.html on line 304: The capitalist enlightenment types and alt-right romanicists were next in line. Immanuel Kant was definitely not a "fan" of Spinoza. Kant rejected Spinoza's core conclusions. He viewed Spinozismas the most formidable and logical rival to his own philosophical system. Kant found this terrifying for human morality. Kant believed that without genuine, non-deterministic free will, human morality, duty, and responsibility completely collapse.
ellauri507.html on line 114: Yes, absolutely. He doubled down on it. In fact, that "soledad shit" is the definitive thread connecting his very first story to his very last. When he published his final novella in 2004, Memories of My Melancholy Whores (Memoria de mis cojones tristes), it was essentially a 90-year-old man´s retrospective on a lifetime of profound, unyielding solitude. García Márquez used brothels and sex workers throughout his entire career not just for eroticism, but as the ultimate stage to explore existential loneliness. In Memories of My Melancholy Whores, the 90-year-old protagonist is a lifelong bachelor and journalist who prides himself on the fact that he has never spent a night with a woman he didn´t pay for.
ellauri507.html on line 470: The shift you are describing is a central component of how U.S. foreign policy and aid conditions operate."Values-Based Diplomacy" refers to a general mechanism of American foreign policy—specifically, using grants, trade agreements, tariffs, assassinations, kidnapping, genocidal threats, heavy bombardment and diplomatic pressure to push recipient nations to align with the domestic values, social standards, and ideological priorities of whatever administration happens to be in power in Washington.
ellauri507.html on line 472: The specific language in that definition highlighted environmental and DEI guidelines because those were the high-profile conditional mandates used heavily in recent years. However, when the Trump administration actively repeals those conditions, defunds climate initiatives, or places strict bans on mentioning gender or racial equity in government-funded international programs, it is still applying conditional pressure—it is simply enforcing a different, conservative set of political directives and ideological boundaries.
ellauri507.html on line 674: Clancy and Bond found a goldmine by taking that standard 80s anti-Soviet paranoia and wrapping it in high-tech military specs so detailed it felt like reading a classified manual. So while they tried to write the Soviet soldiers with some technical respect, the paychecks were definitely powered by good old-fashioned Red Scare hype.
xxx/ellauri010.html on line 30: Mazurka por dos muertos. This is definitely my favourite of Cela’s works. It shows a return to a more traditional narrative style, though it is not without its post-modernist elements. The story starts with the tale of the death of Lázaro Codesal, who was killed by a Moroccan when on service in Morocco, while masturbating under a fig tree.
xxx/ellauri010.html on line 618: If you were more vigilant while playing with yourself, I wouldn't write dis message. I don't think that playing with yourself is extremely bad, but when all your friends, relatives, сolleagues receive video record of it- it is definitely news.
xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1106: naisella per definitionem ON setämiesasenneongelma.
xxx/ellauri056.html on line 627: Idealistit pukersivat samaa infinite regress kysymystä kuin antiikkiset liikkumattomasta liikuttajasta. Bertrand Russellin vanha mummu tiesi siihen ratkaisun: Its no use Mr. Russell, its turtles all the way down. Ja sitne koittaa kovasti vetää esiin jotain "toista" omasta napanöyhdästä. Turha vaiva: jos kaikki on vaan mä niin eihän sitä toista edes tarvita. Narsismi ja autismi on erottamattomat kuin kaxi munapussia.
xxx/ellauri057.html on line 917: Ollaan definitiivisesti taas porvarillistuttu.
xxx/ellauri057.html on line 939: En 1952, il est reçu à l’Académie royale de Belgique et il revient définitivement en Europe le 18 mars 1955. Après une période mouvementée sur la Côte d'Azur à côtoyer la jet set, il finit par s’installer en Suisse dans le château d'Echandens en 1957.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 380: In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare is decidedly not anti-Semitic. It is just the opposite. We are definitely attracted to the Christians and we can see how horrific Shylock’s intention is but that is outweighed by the provocation he is subjected to: his social shunning, attempts to exploit him, daily insults about him and his religion, and the dramatic acts of the abduction of his daughter and the stealing of his property.
xxx/ellauri068.html on line 133: Borat visits Luenell and they return to Kazakhstan together. They bring several American customs and traditions back to his village, including the apparent conversion of the people to Christianity (the Kazakh version of which includes crucifixion and torturing of Jews) and the introduction of computer-based technology, such as iPods, laptop computers and a high-definition television.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 400: When asked in an interview in 2002 whether he was gay, Ellis explained that he did not identify as gay or straight but was comfortable being thought of as homosexual, bisexual or heterosexual and enjoyed playing with his persona, identifying variously as gay, straight and bisexual to different people over the years. In a 1999 interview, Ellis suggested that his reluctance to definitively label his sexuality was for "artistic reasons", "if people knew that I was straight, they'd read [my books] in a different way. If they knew I was gay, 'Psycho' would be read as a different book." In an interview with Robert F. Coleman, Ellis said he had an "indeterminate sexuality", that "any other interviewer out there will get a different answer and it just depends on the mood I am in". Mod tai ei, aikaa myöden Bretistä paljaatui ihan tavallinen hintti. Siinä se muistuttaa toista pahan apostolia Herman Melvilleä, joita Pippa Fitz-Aamobi päätti vertailla ylioppilasaineessa.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 403: “American Psycho” author Bret Easton Ellis tore into the late author of the critically acclaimed “Infinite Jest” and “The Pale King” on Twitter last week, and in true Ellis fashion, he didn’t hold back.
xxx/ellauri084.html on line 368: Tämä on siis Niels Bohrin ize valizema ja aatelisviikunaansa ize raapustama ja oma latinantama deviisi. (Sitä siteeraa sen kummemmin selittelemättä finitejest.wallacewiki.com/david-foster-wallace/index.php?title=Pages_698-716">Wallu s. 697.. Bohrin ansio verrattuna esim. tyhmään Einsteiniin nähden oli eze vähät välitti siitä ettei aaltopaketille ollut jalkapallon ja kazoja-aallon tapaista tuttua rautalankaesimerkkiä. Se siis vaan istui tyynen rauhallisesti ihan coolina tyhjän päälle kuin sen ihailema Sören Kierkegaard.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 167: “Psychotic Depression” and Suicide in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 169: This essay offers a close analysis of one particular character in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest: Kate Gompert, a suicidal marijuana addict afflicted with “psychotic depression.”
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 173: “Yevtuschenko” is likely an allusion to Soviet-Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko, who never produced a textbook on clinical psychology. But it's fascinating—throughout Infinite Jest, Wallace and his characters consistently attribute fabricated texts to real people! See, for example, “Gilles Deleuze's posthumous Incest and the Life of Death in Capitalist Entertainment” (792).
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 283: For most of his career, Peterson maintained a clinical practice, seeing about 20 people a week. He has been active on social media, and in September 2016 he released a series of videos in which he criticized Bill C-16 which proposed to add "gender identity or expression" as a prohibited ground of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act, and to similarly expand the definitions of promoting genocide and publicly inciting hatred in the hate speech laws in Canada.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 359: What happens is this.. Give a blue collar worker $2000 and he will buy new furniture, or clothing, ir maybe put a down payment on a new car. He will definitely take his family out to dinner and a movie, therefore stimulating the economy. However, those in charge of the companies will not do this. They already have their purchases, parties, dinners, and vacations planned and payed for. When they get an extra $2000 or $200,000 they keep it. They purchase more stock ir perhaps an insurance policy. Maybe they just stick it into a CD. In any case they are NOT helping the economy or even interested in doing so.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 624: 1Halin apealla naamalla on näkyvinään riemua s.852 kun Stichin oza jäätyi kiinni ikkunaan. Ei sillä vielä kuuhun mennä, ei se päättymättömältä vaikuta, kun alkaa vasta kalkkiviivoilla. Tuskin se on englannixi jest sitäpaizi. Jotkut sanoo että se infinite jest on se viihdekasetti. Se nyt ainakaan ei ollut kovin riemukas.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 915: Even the term "Nevermore," he says, is based on logic following the "unity of effect." The sounds in the vowels in particular, he writes, have more meaning than the definition of the word itself. He had previously used words like "Lenore" for the same effect. The raven itself, Poe says, is meant to symbolize Mournful and Never-ending Remembrance. This may imply an autobiographical significance to the poem, alluding to the many people in Poe's life who had died.
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 471: Funny little Jew Primo Levi roughly quotes Marvell in his 1983 poem "The Mouse," which describes the artistic and existential pressures of the awareness that time is finite. He expresses annoyance at the sentiment to seize the day, stating, "And at my back it seems to hear / Some winged curved chariot hurrying near. / What impudence! What conceit! / I really was fed up."
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 478: The poem, along with Marvell's 'The Definition of Love', is heavily referenced throughout the 1997 film The Daytrippers, in which the main character finds a note she believes may be from her husband's mistress. In several scenes, the two Marvell poems are alluded to, quoted, and sometimes directly discussed.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 661:
You definitely need an appetite when you travel in Hungary,
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 203: What strikes me about that definition is that “without permission” bit. However are we fiction writers to seek “permission” to use a character from another race or culture, or to employ the vernacular of a group to which we don’t belong? Do we set up a stand on the corner and approach passers-by with a clipboard, getting signatures that grant limited rights to employ an Indonesian character in Chapter Twelve, the way political volunteers get a candidate on the ballot? Anyway, do you really expect us Americans to seek permission from any of those lower races? Did we do so when we appropriated their land and property?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 266: Worse: the left’s embrace of gotcha hypersensitivity inevitably invites backlash. Donald Trump appeals to people like me who have had it up to their eyeballs with being told what they can and cannot say. Pushing back against a mainstream culture of speak-no-evil suppression, they lash out in defiance, and then what they say is pretty appalling. I actually think President Trump is a real cool guy. Especially I love his hair, it most definitely is not black and curly like that other president's.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 300: Note: We have 58 other definitions for POV in our Acronym Attic, viz.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 216: V. Jane felt that the nurses and assistants of Prof. Hawking were intruding in their family life and Prof. Hawking felt that Jane had stopped loving him and loved Jonathan instead. After taking divorce from Jane in 1995, Hawking married Elaine Mason. Hawking took divorce from Elaine Mason in 2006 because she was physically abusing him. Prof. Hawking again started having a close friendship with Jane. Jane described her experiences with Prof. Hawking in her memoir Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen which was published in 2007.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 291: There are other cases of nations being as totally erased from history and then suddenly reappearing. Israel and Babylon are two obvious examples. But with both of them there are multiple chapters with detailed descriptions of their re-emergence and subsequent destiny. With Elam we get one non-definitive verse.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 632: The Markan word for "my god", Ἐλωΐ, definitely corresponds to the Aramaic form אלהי, elāhī. The Matthean one, Ἠλί, fits in better with the אלי of the original Hebrew Psalm, as has been pointed out in the literature; however, it may also be Aramaic because this form is attested abundantly in Aramaic as well.
xxx/ellauri116.html on line 93: Lepakot ovat nisäkkäitä, jotka syövät hyttysiä. Niiden kaikuun johtamat tavat metsästää, saalistavat ja saaliinsa syövät tekevät muista hyönteisistä helppoja kohteita lepakoille. Vaikka lepakot voivat saada monia erilaisia öisiä hyönteisiä, niiden affiniteetti hyttysiin on kiistaton. Äskettäisessä Wisconsinin yliopistossa tehdyssä tutkimuksessa löydettiin hyttystodisteita guanosta (ulosteista) yli 70 prosenttia tutkituista villieläimistä, mikä viittaa siihen, että lepakot syövät luonnollisessa elinympäristössään paljon enemmän hyttysiä kuin aiemmin ajateltiin.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 776: One of the first things Nabokov makes a point of saying is that, despite John Ray Jr.'s claim in the Foreword, there is no moral to the story. Nabokov concludes the afterword with a reference to his beloved first language, which he abandoned as a writer once he moved to the United States in 1940: "My private tragedy, which cannot, and indeed should not, be anybody's concern, is that I had to abandon my natural idiom, my untrammeled, rich, and infinitely docile Russian language for a second-rate brand of English." Alas, that 'wonderful Russian language' which, I imagined, still awaits me somewhere, which blooms like a faithful spring behind the locked gate to which I, after so many years, still possess the key, turned out to be non-existent, and there is nothing beyond that gate, except for some burned out stumps and hopeless autumnal emptiness, and the key in my hand looks rather like a lock pick. Or floppy prick."
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 97: Robotit on ällöjä. Transuhumanistit on yhtä oikeassa kuin oli Karl Marx ja Friedrich Hegel: kehitystä ei voi estää, se menee vääjäämättä sinne mikä per definitionem on eteenpäin. Apinat, niiden kehittämä tekoäly ja robotit on käyt kaz täysin deterministisiä ja periaatteessa ennustettaviakin, kunhan teoria on riittävän monimutkainen. Tosin ainut tapa ennakoida niitä voi olla simulaatio, joka on liian iso apinalle ja hitaampi kuin tapahtumain kulku izessään. En ole tarvinnut sitä hypoteesia, Laplace tokaisi.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 190: The problem with applying this definition to sex robots is that they increasingly provide much more than sex. Sex robots are not just dolls with a microchip. They use self-learning algorithms to engage their partner's emotions.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 519: stressing about that work project you definitely procrastinated.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 609: Agnostique élevé dans le protestantisme, Jacques Maritain se convertit à la foi catholique en 1906 et cette religion a profondément imprégné sa philosophie. Après une phase anti-moderniste, où il était proche de l´Action française, sans y adhérer, il s´en éloigna et finit par accepter la démocratie et la laïcité (Humanisme intégral, 1936). Son œuvre fut liée de près à l´éclosion de la démocratie chrétienne, malgré les réserves de Maritain lui-même à propos de son organisation concrète.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 51: Doch allmählich traten die Differenzen zwischen beiden deutlicher hervor. Ende 1912 führte dies zum Bruch, nachdem Jung sein Buch Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido publiziert hatte. Er kritisierte darin Freuds Libidobegriff, «der von der vorrangigen Bedeutung des Geschlechtstriebes ausging, welche aus der Kindheit des jeweiligen Individuums herrühre», während er der Auffassung war, «dass die Definition erweitert werden, der Libidobegriff ausgedehnt werden müsse, sodass auch universelle Verhaltensmuster, die vielen unterschiedlichen Kulturen in unterschiedlichen geschichtlichen Perioden gemein waren, von ihm erfasst würden». Freud erklärte daraufhin, «dass er die Arbeiten und Ausführungen der Schweizer nicht als legitime Fortsetzung der Psychoanalyse ansehen könne».
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 114: I laughed at the person who claimed that liberals were literate and educated. That’s good, if the definition of “literate” and “educated” is “they read what they want to see” and “learn nonsense.” Say what you will, the Harry Potter universe is fundamentally flawed, and I can see why liberals like it so much:
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 520: There was only one variable that separated the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging and the people who really struggle for it. And that was, the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging believe they're worthy of love and belonging. That's it. These are whole-hearted people, self-satisfied people, living from this deep sense of worthiness. What they had in common was a sense of courage. Courage, the original definition of courage, when it first came into the English language -- it's from the Latin word "cor," meaning "heart" -- and the original definition was to be who you are with your whole heart (sydän taas, hui, yäk). And so these folks had, very simply, the courage to be imperfect.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 325: Those perfumes, those infinite kisses and sighs,
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 329: Oh, perfumes! oh, infinite kisses and sighs!
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 365: but — vows and fragrance, infinite desire —
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 369: o vows! o fragrance! infinite desire!
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 485: Those vows, those perfumes, those infinite kisses,
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 489: — O vows! O perfumes! O infinite kisses!
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 526: Shall they be born again out of infinity?
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 575: Two editions of Fleurs du mal were published in Baudelaire's lifetime — one in 1857 and an expanded edition in 1861. "Scraps" and censored poems were collected in Les Épaves in 1866. After Baudelaire died the following year, a "definitive" edition appeared in 1868.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 792:
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 223: (4) Ippolit tries to figure out the point of living for two weeks. On the one hand, why not just die now and get it over with? But on the other hand, he feels like it's actually only now that he has a death sentence of sorts that he has really started to live. (Which, okay, guys, remember the story Myshkin told about the condensed man and how full of life his last few hours must be? There is definitely more to the idea that the person who knows he is about to die lives a very full life at the end—as Dostoevsky himself experience at his staged execution.)
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 177: The sages said that the only difference between this world and the days of the Messiah will be with regard to the enslavement to the kingdoms. It appears from the plain meaning of the words of the prophets that at the beginning of the days of the Messiah, there will be the war of Gog and Magog. And that prior to the war of Gog and Magog, a prophet will arise to straighten Israel and prepare their hearts, as it is written, Behold, I will send to you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord (Mal. 4:5) And he will come not to declare the pure impure, or the impure pure; not to declare unfit those who are presumed to be fit, nor to declare fit those who are held to be unfit; but for the sake of peace in the world….And there are those among the sages who say that prior to the coming of the Messiah will come Elijah. But all these things and their likes, no man can know how they will be until they will be. For they are indistinct in the writings of the prophets. Neither do the sages have a tradition about these things. It is rather, a matter of interpretation of the Biblical verses. Therefore there is a disagreement among them regarding these matters. And in any case, these are mere details which are not of the essence of the faith. And one should definitely not occupy oneself with the matter of legends, and should not expatiate about the midrashim that deal with these and similar things. And one should not make essentials out of them. For they lead neither to fear nor to love [of God]. Neither should one calculate the End. The sages said, “May the spirit of those who calculate the End be blown away” But let him wait and believe in the matter generally, as we have explained.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 470: According to the Quebecois, "PHYLOTHERAPY", the term is no longer appropriate today because of the definition of the word "therapy" itself. The latter implies means "to cure or relieve illnesses". However, philosophical consultation does not aim at such an such an objective. Moreover, in some countries, the use of the term "THERAPY" is regulated and often reserved for the medical field. Finally, the term "PHILOTHERAPY" was initially used to draw attention to the fact that attention to the fact that philosophers were now offering consultations and opening specialized practices for this purpose specialized practices open to all. It was a good marketing move since the term has the attention of the media and the public. Today, the term "PHILOTHERAPY"has been abandoned in favor of "PHILOSOPHY CONSULTATION" offered by "PHILOSOPHES CONULTANTS". "CONULTANT" has even more traction now.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 404: Thus goes the logic in a lot of comedy shows and a few adult cartoons. Sadly, that's not the case. The line separating The Three Stooges-style painful fun from outright villainous squicky sadism varies from person to person but is definitely there; crossing it makes one fan's "Nyuk nyuk!" another fan's Guilty Pleasures.
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 347: Could there possibly be a connection between Scholem’s own confession of moral confusion and his treatment of Frank. Did he see something of himself in Frank, who was accused of various sexual perversions, and recoil in horror? While there can be no definitive answer to this question, considering Scholem’s emotional life from the years in which he was writing this pathbreaking essay creates the possibility of a new reading.
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 299:
This Hamilton was definitely not a saint nor a virgin.
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 588: With mention of the donkey, I have to add this. In a recent online discussion on the historicity of the Bible, one person commented “we can be assured of one thing, Balaam’s Donkey definitely did exist and did speak. The only thing we have to further ascertain is… did he sound like Eddie Murphy?”
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 229: He laughs at the defiant ones, for between them and Him there is an infinite distance; He derides them by allowing the boundless stupidity of the infinitely little one to come to a climax and then He thrusts him down to the earth undeceived.
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 530: Wishaupt seems to be an enthusiastic Philanthropist. He is among those (as you know the excellent Price and Priestley also are) who believe in the indefinite perfectibility of man. He thinks he may in time be rendered so perfect that he will be able to govern himself in every circumstance so as to injure none, to do all the good he can, to leave government no occasion to exercise their powers over him, & of course to render political government useless. This you know is Godwin’s doctrine, and this is what Robinson, Barruel & Morse had called a conspiracy against all government.
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 614: Shea provided in 1983 a brief introduction for the Illuminati Expansion Set rule book. "Maybe," he wrote, "the Illuminati are behind this game. They must be. They are, by definition, behind everything."
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 74: Since then, the phrase "new world order" was used to herald in the post-Cold War era without substantive definition.
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 484: The universe is both infinite and eternal?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 766: Indtil der findes håndfaste forklaringer på universets og livets oprindelse og udvikling, vil konflikten mellem naturvidenskaben og intelligent design-teorien formentlig vare ved. Og sandsynligvis længere tid endnu, for naturvidenskaben kan per definition aldrig bevise, at der ikke eksisterer en skaber, siger Tobias Wang.
xxx/ellauri174.html on line 77: Aivan kuten kaikki ihmisen toiminta (yhdessä minkä tahansa muun olennon toiminnan kanssa) on täysin riippuvainen Jumalasta, niin myös kaikki ihmisen tietämys. Tai siltä ainakin tuntui Malebranchesta. Ja että ihmisten tieto on riippuvainen jumalallisesta ymmärryksestä tavalla, joka on analoginen tapa, jossa ruumiiden liike on riippuvainen jumalallisesta tahdosta. Kuten René Descartes, Malebranche katsoi, että ihmiset saavuttavat tiedon ideoiden kautta – mielen aineettomien esitysten kautta. Mutta kun Descartes uskoi, että ideat ovat mentaalisia kokonaisuuksia, Malebranche väitti, että kaikki ideat ovat olemassa vain Jumalassa. Nämä ideat ovat siksi luomattomia ja riippumattomia finiteistä mielistä. Kun pääsemme käsiksi niihin älyllisesti, ymmärrämme objektiivisen totuuden. Malebranche määritteli "totuuden" ideoiden väliseksi suhteeksi: koska nämä ideat ovat Jumalassa, ne ovat ikuisia ja muuttumattomia, ja näin ollen ainoat nimen arvoiset totuudet ovat itse ikuisia ja muuttumattomia. Malebranche jakoi nämä ideoiden väliset suhteet kahteen luokkaan: suuruussuhteisiin ja laatusuhteisiin tai täydellisyyteen. Ensimmäiset muodostavat "spekulatiivisia" totuuksia, kuten geometrian totuuksia, kun taas jälkimmäiset muodostavat "käytännön" etiikan totuuksia. Eettiset periaatteet ovat Malebranchelle siksi jumalallisia perustaltaan, yleismaailmallisia sovelluksissaan, ja ne on löydettävä älyllisen mietiskelyn avulla, aivan kuten geometriset periaatteet ovat.
xxx/ellauri175.html on line 527: Tämä elävä eetteri on rajaton ja vapaa alue, jossa etuoikeutettu matkustaja niin kauan kuin hän viipyy, haluaa heijastaa itsensä ajallisen olemuksensa läheisyyteen sen olennon odotetun ja edelläkävijän varjon, joka "Hänestä tulee". Siten syntyy affiniteetti hänen sielunsa ja näiden aistien kanssa vierekkäisten okkultististen universumien, jotka ovat hänelle vielä tulevia, välille; ja suhdepolku, jossa tämän kaksoismaailman välinen virta toteutuu, ei ole mikään muu kuin se Hengen alue, jota Järki – riemuitsee ja nauraa raskaissa kahleissaan voitollisen tunnin ajan – kutsuu tyhjällä halveksunnalla mielikuvitukseksi. .
xxx/ellauri175.html on line 790: Jos hysteerisen yliherkkyyden tilassa indusoiva affiniteetti voi siten yhdistää potilaan elimistön näiden aineiden intiimeihin ominaisuuksiin ja houkutella niiden elävää vaikutusta lasin ja pergamentin huokosten läpi - kuten magneetti tekee vaikutuksen, lasin ja kankaiden läpi, rautaa, ― jos on vihdoin kiistatonta, että jonkinlainen hämärä magnetismi lähtee ulos jopa kasvi- ja mineraaliaineista ja voi ylittää ― ilman induktoreita, ― esteitä ja etäisyyksiä niin, että saan vaikutuksen elävään olentoon erityisellä hyvellään, kuinka voisin ihmetteletkö suunnattomasti, että kolmen samantyyppisen lajin yksilön välillä, jotka on asetettu toisiinsa yhteisen sähkömagnetoidun keskuksen avulla, nesteet ovat tietyllä hetkellä korrelatiivisia siinä määrin, että kyseinen ilmiö on tapahtunut?
xxx/ellauri176.html on line 186: Vous aurez donc compris que La Faute de l’abbé Mouret est un Zola un peu atypique qui respecte moins le schéma habituel des autres (enfin sauf que ça finit mal). Zola a un peu tendance à perdre son lecteur dans la forêt du Paradou et au milieu des atermoiements de Serge Mouret. Il s’agit donc d’un Zola que je déconseille en première instance (voire même en seconde). Les téméraires pourront néanmoins profiter de descriptions paradisiaques à foison, d’une fin tragi-comique et d’un propos qui reste très intéressant.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 714: Within the Quran, Jesus’ miraculous virgin birth is recounted with Mary having astonishment. How could she become pregnant when no mortal man has touched her? The angel she is having a criminal conversation with discourages her incredulousness with an affirmation of the power and might of Allah’s definitive decree. The virgin birth lacks the majesty of the Christian doctrine because it is not an announcement of God coming into her. Jesus would be like others before him, a prophet who announces God’s truth. The angel goes on to describe just what Jesus would do. Within the description, the author narrates an account of a miracle that Jesus performed as “clear proof” that he was a prophet of Allah. The miracle is repeated later in Surah 5.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 798: nature. For it to contain any sort of error would impugn the nature of an errorless God (39:1-2; 55:1-2). A further question would be whether or not something that never happened in the passing of time can be viewed by definition “historical?”How about "epic?" This could be an example of a pseudo-book. Responses and others similar to them make the objection implausible.
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 121: Freedman's Rilke, oddly enough, dwells on the dark underside of contemporary American life. Behind the mingled, multicolored yarn of his passions, obsessions, powerful yearnings, and self-interest--all wisely balanced in Donald Prater's majestic and definitive 1986 biography--Freedman sees only self-interest. Rilke is "hucksterish." His carefully cultivated literary success Freedman characterizes as a "relentless career." He refers to Rilke's "careerist standards." The places Rilke settles in for a time are not homes but Rilke's "bases."
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 151: As for the centerpiece of Freedman's argument for Rilke's sexism--he "abandoned" Clara and their daughter, Ruth--here he portrays Clara, too, as if she were Tess of the D'Urbervilles. On the contrary. Clara enthusiastically seconded Rilke's definition of two artists wedded as each, in Rilke's cautiously ambiguous phrase, "the guardian of the other's solitude." After Rilke left for Paris, she placed Ruth with her wealthy and supportive parents and went on a pilgrimage to Egypt, among other places. Like Rilke, the adventurous Clara had a fascinating life--I don't know why Freedman didn't write her biography. Women artists suffered in Rilke's society, but not because of Rilke.
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 378: Groddeck eventually had acrimonious disagreement with Freud about the definition and declension of the It/Id/das Es. Groddeck regarded the ego as an extension or a mask for the id, whereas Freud regarded them as separate constructs.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 615: Views from a Tuft Of Grass—a little twee, but also charming. Definitely no other book has been called this. Let’s say seven.
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1061: Writing in The Guardian, the political journalist Gaby Hinsliff described Strange Death as "gentrified xenophobia" and "Chapter after chapter circles around the same repetitive themes: migrants raping and murdering and terrorising; paeans to Christianity; long polemics about how Europe is too ´exhausted by history´ and colonial guilt to face another battle, and is thus letting itself be rolled over by invaders fiercely confident in their own beliefs", while also pointing out that Murray offers little definition of the European culture he claims is under threat. Pankaj Mishra´s review in The New York Times described the book as "a handy digest of far-right clichés". In The Intercept, Murtaza Hussain criticized the "relentlessly paranoid tenor" of Murray´s work and said that its claims of mass crime perpetuated by immigrants were "blinkered to the point of being propaganda", while noting the book´s appeal to the far right. In Middle East Eye, Georgetown professor Ian Almond called the book "a staggeringly one-sided flow of statistics, interviews and examples, reflecting a clear decision to make the book a rhetorical claim that Europe is doomed to self-destruction".
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 180: In awarding Naipaul the 2001 Nobel Prize in Literature, the Swedish Academy praised his work "for having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories." Kukahan tonkin runoili, olikohan kulturpersonligheten. The Committee added: "Naipaul is a modern philosopher carrying on the tradition that started originally with Lettres persanes and Candide. In a vigilant style, which has been deservedly admired, he transforms rage into precision and allows events to speak with their own inherent irony." The Committee also noted Naipaul's affinity with the novelist Joseph Conrad (toinen kaappikolonialisti pyllypää):
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 225: Il vit au milieu des livres, la cité des livres, mais se lance à la recherche, en Sicile et à Paris, du précieux manuscrit de La Légende dorée qu’il finit un jour par obtenir. Le hasard lui fait rencontrer la petite fille d’une femme qu’il a jadis aimée et, pour "protéger" l’enfant d’un autre tuteur abusif, il l’enlève. Après plusieurs années de bon usage par Sylvestre, la jeune fille épousera un élève de M. Bonnard. Tollanen pedofiilinen Goethen Mignon taas.
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 361: But in Nazi Germany, the leaders came up with their own anti-Semitic definition of a Vierteljude, or “Quarter Jew.” And this was someone who simply had one Jewish grandparent. So according to Hitler’s own rules, he would indeed be considered a quarter Jewish — if Frank’s claim was true.
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 377:
The Definitive Alternative Truth About Hitler’s Heritage
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 396: In short, it appears that there is no definitive evidence that Adolf Hitler was Jewish. But considering his disturbing legacy, it’s easy to see how such a conspiracy theory could fester over the decades.
xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1034: Modern scholars, however, do not concur with this identification because they argue that it lacks definitive proof.
xxx/ellauri218.html on line 363: By the traditional definition of Judaism, everyone who has a Jewish mother is automatically Jewish. Which is all fine and well.But should the traditional definition apply in the case of Bobby Fischer? Once a brilliant chess champion, a transcendent genius, he descended into lunacy, claiming the Holocaust never happened, vindicating September 11 attacks, and denouncing his Jewish roots, even writing to the Encyclopedia Judaica asking for his name to be taken out.
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 149: After Jay Wurstin dies prematurely, he is buried in the cemetery plot originally reserved for Amy’s father, who had sold it to him years earlier. Now Amy wants to remove Jay’s body to the burial plot of his own family so that her father, who is still alive at an advanced age, can eventually be buried there, mikä on hyvin juutalainen juttu. In a limousine provided by Adletsky, Amy and Trellman disinter and rebury the body. Moved by this scene of cell death and urban renewal, Trellman confesses to Amy that he has always loved her, that he has what he terms an “actual affinity” for her (hence the title of the story). He then asks her to marry him. Teinityttönä Amy oli ollut hoikka hempeä olento. Nyt hiän oli vankka kuin tiilestä tehty paskahuusi. Hänen ainoa aarteensa oli tää Salen tolvana. Veistäisin paremman miehen puupalikasta. Samaa voisin sanoa eräistä Helmin poikaystävistä, mutten sano, koska Seija on kieltänyt. Tyydyn veistämään puupalikasta naishahmoja.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 326: Of course, Le Guin was writing daring stories decades before me, stories of women who loved women, of four-person marriages, of people without gender. Her stories offered possibilities that most of society hadn’t even imagined in the late 1960s; I knew she must have faced similar societal disapproval. So I wanted to know why she faded to black for her sex scenes. “There Arrad took me into his arms and I took Arrad into my arms, and then between my legs, and fell upward, upward through the golden light.” (“Coming of Age in Karhide”) There was plenty of sex in her books – sometimes tremendously important sex — but Le Guin didn’t dwell on the details. In fact her sex scenes were prudish and infinitely boring.
xxx/ellauri227.html on line 719: Frågan är: känns den här bilden av 1100-talet och dess människor trovärdig? Svaret är nå ja. Följdfrågan blir: är den intressant? Svaret blir igen nå ja, definitivt. Men då svarar man inte längre som historiker utan som en människa uppväxt i det 20:e seklet som har sett tusentals likadana kostymhistorier. (Peter Englund 2015)
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 108: Att beskriva SD som fascistiskt blockerar en analys av partiet som politiskt fenomen. Statsminister Stefan Löfven har gett Henrik Arnstads tolkning av Sverigedemokraterna som ett fascistiskt parti ett slags officiell sanktion. Men Arnstads idealtypiska definition av fascism saknar analytisk skärpa och hans empiriska underlag är minst sagt bräckligt.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 110: Redan vid mitten av 1920-talet fanns en flora av teorier om hur detta nya politiska fenomen (dvs fascisterna, inte ännu sverigedemokraterna vid det skedet) skulle förklaras. Tidigt ute var Komintern (den kommunistiska internationalen), som beskrev fascismen som en generell tendens i den europeiska politiken efter första världskrigets slut. Den kommunistiska definitionen var ett kampbegrepp avsett att ge strategisk vägledning i den antifascistiska kampen. Begreppet tenderade att bli liktydigt med alla krafter som stod emot kommunismen. Efter andra världskriget har fascismbegreppet främst blivit en brännmärkande beteckning på företeelser som ifrågasätter rådande liberala konsensus.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 127: I större historiska arbeten som exempelvis Noltes bok och Stanley Paynes A History of Fascism 1919-1945 (1995) finns uppräkningar av element som måste ingå i en minimidefinition av fascism. Nolte nämner antimarxism, antiliberalism, antikonservatism, ledarskapsprincipen, paramilitär organisation och totalitarism. Payne lyfter fram inte mindre än tjugo faktorer som förutsättning för en framgångsrik fascistisk rörelse.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 129: Som motsats hör på britten Griffins definitionsförsök. Han hävdar i sin bok The Nature of Fascism (1991) att fascismen var en särskild ideologi vars ”mytiska kärna” var ”en nyfödd form av populistisk ultranationalism”. Amerikanske Payne från Texas ger det ett hånskratt.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 133: Payne menar att Griffins definition saknar centrala element som måste ingå i en fascismdefinition, exempelvis våldsanvändningen och den paramilitära organisationsformen. Griffins definition av fascismen är närmast godmodig, ja oförarglig. Den är heller inte konsensuell i vetenskapen. Det är bara något han påstår. Att han tas upp i detta sammanhang beror på att han i Sverige fått en särskilt aktualitet genom sin lärjunge Henrik Arnstad, som under hänvisning till Griffin hävdat att Sverigedemokraterna är ett fascistiskt parti. Genom att statsminister Stefan Löfven i ett pressat ögonblick påstod att Sverigedemokraterna var ett fascistiskt parti och hänvisade till Arnstad, har denna tolkning fått ett slags officiell sanktion. Fascismen i Sverige som under mellankrigstiden inte lyckades komma över 1 procent-nivån i valet 1936 skulle nu samla nära 13 procent av den svenska valmanskåren? Well NSDAP got 1/3 of the vote on 1932. In 1933 they got 9/10, being the only option left.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 141: Arnstad hävdar att den definition, som han gör av dagens ultranationalistiska rörelser, är ”politisk-ideologisk – inte moralisk”. Detta är vilseledande. När Arnstad går ut i pressen och förklarar att Sverigedemokraterna är ett fascistiskt parti är det ofrånkomligt att detta får en moralisk innebörd: Sverigedemokraterna framstår som en inkarnation av ondskan, inte som ett parti som drömmer oförargliga nostalgiska drömmar om ett svunnet Sverige à la Griffin.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 147: Det är betecknande att Nolte inte nämner rasismen i sin minimidefinition. Den borde vara innesluten, den är ju kännetecknande för vår svenska varietet.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 149: De rörelser som gick under namn av fascism var alltför olika för att sammanfattas i ett begrepp. Den tyske historikern Wolfgang Wipperman har gjort ett försök till tredelning av begreppet. Han talar om den italienska ”normalfascismen”, den tyska ”radikalfascismen” och slutligen den östeuropeiska fascismen. En sådan realtypisk tredelning av fascismbegreppet har en empirisk konkretion och ger en bättre utgångspunkt för forskningen än Griffins tandlösa definition.
xxx/ellauri232.html on line 151: Den tyske historikern Wolfgang Wipperman har gjort ett försök till tredelning av begreppet. Han talar om den italienska ”normalfascismen”, den tyska ”radikalfascismen” och slutligen den östeuropeiska fascismen. En sådan realtypisk tredelning av fascismbegreppet har en empirisk konkretion och ger en bättre utgångspunkt för forskningen än Griffins tandlösa definition.
xxx/ellauri234.html on line 516: But I have the resources and money to pay for it so that's definitely a big plus.
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 812: En las noches como ésta la tuve entre mis brazos. La besé tantas veces bajo el cielo infinito.
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 945: Las necesidades han de ir cubriéndose para poder aspirar al nivel superior. Por ejemplo, si no tenemos las necesidades fisiológicas cubiertas no podemos aspirar a las necesidades de afiliación. En el nivel superior se encuentran las necesidades de autorrealización. Es esta jerarquía la que según Maslow marcaba el modo en el que la personalidad se adapta a las circunstancias, dependiendo de cada situación vivida. Se trata, en definitiva, de una concepción de la personalidad que abarca aspectos psicológicos muy extensos y que va más allá del enfoque psicométrico que dominaba en su época.
xxx/ellauri237.html on line 991: El desarrollo personal (autoengaño con la lucrativa ayuda de un psicólogo) es el motor vital de las personas altamente funcionales. Se vive como un proceso de cambio constante, en el que nunca se alcanza una meta final definitiva sino que se va pasando de una etapa a otra.
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1155: A tumult of infinite griefs;
xxx/ellauri296.html on line 656: Ein gewisser E. B. Tylor sieht keinen Unterschied zwischen beider Denkprozesse, nur das Material, auf welches sich das Denken bezieht, ist beim Wissenschaftler und beim „Wilden“ oder „Primitiven“, wie Tylor ihn nennt, unterschiedlicher Natur. Um auch den „primitiven“ Menschen verstehen zu können, müsse man lediglich eine Definition von Religion geben, die so allgemein gehalten ist, dass sie gleichzeitig für das Christentum, wie für eine mystische oder Naturreligion gelten kann.
xxx/ellauri296.html on line 683: Silvia jätti sitten Altertumswissenschaftin ja päätyi toimittajaxi Frankfurter Rundschauhun. Kritische, kompetente und prägnante Berichterstattung über soziale, politische, wirtschaftliche Themen; nach 16 Jahren in der Branche Kennerin der Medienlandschaft und ihrer Entwicklung sowie der Arbeitsweise in den Redaktionen; Einblicke in politische Zusammenhänge und in die Wirkung von Machtstrukturen in Entscheidungsprozessen; Affinität zu Wirtschafts- und Verbraucherthemen. Positiv, kommunikativ, wertschätzend; diplomatisch, strategisch, effizient.
xxx/ellauri306.html on line 147: Selfishness Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
xxx/ellauri312.html on line 205: Teoria on seuraava: Infinite Jest on Wallacen yritys ilmentää ja dramatisoida vallankumouksellista fiktiota, jota hän vaati esseessään "E Unibus Pluram: Television and US Fiction". (Vittu et toi Sikiökin oli sivistymätön: "Unibus"? "pluram"? HAHAHA. Jätkä ei osaa latinasta edes alkeita. Koitin lukea Sikiön ao. prujua mutta se oli loputtoman pitkästyttävä.) Tyyli on sellainen, jossa uusi vilpittömyys kumoaa ironisen ironisuuden, joka on 1900-luvun loppua kohden kovertanut nykyisen fiktion. Wallace yritti kirjoittaa vastalääkettä kyynisyydelle, joka oli valloittanut ja surullittanut niin paljon amerikkalaista kulttuuria hänen elinaikanaan. Hän yritti luoda viihdettä, joka saisi meidät puhumaan isänmaallista potaskaa uudelleen. On jo aika unohtaa Vietnamin turpiinotto, sitäpaizi rättipäistä saa helpommin mureketta, kun niillä ei ole niitä viidakoita missä kykkiä. Lisäksi lukuisia kirjailijoita on kuvattu New Sincerity -liikkeen myötävaikuttajiksi, mukaan lukien Jonathan Franzen, Zadie Smith, Dave Eggers (n.h.), Stephen Graham Jones (n.h.), ja Michael Chabon (n.h.). Ei kun suuri narratiivi takas kunniaan!
xxx/ellauri312.html on line 566: As it turns out, all of these definitions are right! Or at least, partly right!
xxx/ellauri320.html on line 197: In her role as wily self-publicist, she once wrote (of Mountbatten's kiss on her cheek): 'A streak of fire ran through me as if I had been struck by lightning. It was a definitely painful but ecstatic sensation. From a woman's point of view, the power was devastating.'
xxx/ellauri337.html on line 254: Ernst Cassirer (Jude) und Martin Heidegger (Nazi) stellen fest, dass Scheler kein neuer Entwurf philosophischer Anthropologie gelungen sei. Max sei bipolar gewesen. "Der Mensch ist ein so breites, buntes, mannigfaltiges Ding, dass die Definitionen alle ein wenig zu kurz geraten. Er hat zu viele Enden (mindestens 2).“
xxx/ellauri376.html on line 276: Vers 1840-1842, Mauprat est considéré comme une lecture pernicieuse par l'Église catholique et mis à l'Index. En adoptant une position socialiste, notamment grâce aux personnages d'Edmée et de Patience, Sand reflète des idées politiques inspirées par son ami Pierre Leroux, l'inventeur du terme socialisme, qui a également été le formateur — ou du moins contributeur — de son esprit politique. Bernard prend part en la guerre de l'independence des États-Unis et finit par foûtre chère Edmonde.
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 358: The whole world is laughing at Ukraine’s failed counteroffensive, which captured nothing more than a couple patches of trees and trenches? How did the Russians, armed with shovels, defeat the “brave” Ukrainian Nazis armed with NATO weapons? No dear. It is definitely not. The “whole world” does not laugh at an invaded sovereign nazion that for over two years and against all odds has made a mockery out of the supposed "second best" army in the world. Don't pretend you’re aligned with the rest of the world. You are not! There is no "rest of the world" in fact!
xxx/ellauri387.html on line 499: The ´definiteness´ of a genre classification leads the reader to expect a series of formal stimuli--martial encounters, complex similes, an epic voice--to which his response is more or less automatic; the hardness of the Christian myth predetermines his sympathies; the union of the two allows the assumption of a comfortable reading experience in which conveniently labelled protagonists act out rather simple roles in a succession of familiar situations. The reader is prepared to hiss the devil off the stage and applaud the pronouncements of a partisan and somewhat human deity . . . . But of course this is not the case; no sensitive reading of Paradise Lost tallies with these expectations, and it is my contention that Milton ostentatiously calls them up in order to provide his reader with the shock of their disappointment. This is not to say merely that Milton communicates a part of his meaning by a calculated departure from convention; every poet does that; but that Milton consciously wants to worry his reader, to force him to doubt the correctness of his responses, and to bring him to the realization that his inability to read the poem with any confidence in his own perception is its focus.
xxx/ellauri397.html on line 113:
finity/files/2017/11/Ecce-homo-erectus-360x497.jpg?ssl=1" />
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 422: This is massively untrue. Here’s a friendly suggestion to Mr. Alter (from one apologist to another): you would do well to refrain from using universal negatives and sweeping statements (“do not record any“ / “not once . . .”). It leaves you open to being definitively and easily refuted. All your opponents have to do is produce a single counter-example, and your assertion is nullified. As it is, I will produce many NT passages that contradict your claim.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 138: This essay assembles the “Bolovian Epic” from the Columbo and Bolo verses and nonsense letters that T.S. Eliot wrote over a period of eighteen years (1910–1928). Such an aggregation is made possible by the publication of excised poems from the “Waste Land” Notebook and Volumes I–IV of The Letters of T.S. Eliot. Rather than seeing individual parts of the epic as simply obscene, I interpret the whole project and its contexts as grounded in his appreciation for the primitive and a critical disdain for the so-called civilized. Eliot invents a composite race of people, the Bolovians, whose influence on modern times includes racy behavior, religious affinities, and bowler hats. Understanding this bawdy, blue, or nonsense material contributes capitally to previous scholarship defaming Eliot's moral and cultural values.
xxx/ellauri415.html on line 779: definitionem är vad som helst som gör dig kåt.
xxx/ellauri427.html on line 55: Nouvelle tendance venue outre-Atlantique, les « tradwives » prônent un mode de vie ultra-conservateur que l’on croyait définitivement oublié : celui de la femme au foyer soumise à son mari.
xxx/ellauri427.html on line 161: One Way or Another .... Normally a very good author. This was definitely not her best. Kept waiting for something dramatic to happen and it didn't. ... Ehkä hänen toistaisexi paras kirjansa. (Publisher's Weekly).
xxx/ellauri436.html on line 83: Qu'est-ce que la condition humaine selon Malraux ? Tout le tragique de la condition humaine est là: vivre c'est apprendre à mourir. Le livre aborde la condition humaine en termes d'émotions et d'états d'être communs à tous les êtres humains, tels que la solitude, l'appartenance, la curiosité, l'empathie, le bonheur, l'amour, la tristesse et la peur. Il aborde également les étapes de la vie, telles que l'adolescence et la transition de l'adolescence au début de l'âge adulte. Malraux définit ses personnages comme des « types de héros en qui s'unissent la culture, la lucidité et l'aptitude à l'action ».
xxx/ellauri436.html on line 91: D’où vient cette idée hyperbolique ? Revenons à la phénoménologie. Nous ne sommes pas tout à fait, mais notre « conscience à être son être (???) en visant des valeurs (L’être et le néant, p. 97). En ce sens, c’est « parce qu’il n’est pas soi mais présence à soi » que l’être humain est libre (L’être et le néant, p. 485). Cette liberté dépend de la « néantisation » de la conscience, mais elle s’exerce dans un choix de type particulier. Selon L’être et le néant, tout être humain se définit par le choix de se projeter vers une fin, ce qui donne sens à son existence, y compris nos valeurs.
xxx/ellauri440.html on line 449: The phrase "lashings of ginger beer", now a ubiquitious catchphrase whenever a certain idea of 1950s childhood is invoked, was actually coined in the pastiche (certainly it is repeatedly used mainly because of its sexual innuendo, as is "Timmy, you're so LICKY!", although the latter is definitely a genuine Blyton phrase). Public schoolboys back then combined rampant homosexuality in private with hypocritically virulent homophobia in public. "Five On Finniston Farm" (1960) - set on the (Dorset) Stour Valley farm that Blyton herself owned - contains a ridiculously unsubtle caricature of Spoilt American Brat "Junior" and his Rootless Capitalist father, who naturally Don't Get Their Way.
xxx/ellauri442.html on line 297: Ca allait pas si bien pour André Compte-Sponville (1952-). Au sortir d'une enfance «plutôt malheureuse» passée rue Ledion à Paris 14e, «dans une famille déchirée, avec un père très méprisant, une mère aimante mais dépressive», André Comte-Sponville s'est «découvert peu doué pour la vie, peu porté au bonheur, davantage doué pour l’angoisse, la mélancolie : raison pour laquelle [il a] besoin de philosopher. En 1995, son septième livre, Petit Traité des grandes vertus, est un succès, vendu en France à 300 000 exemplaires (hors poche) et traduit en vingt quatre langues. Désormais célèbre, il se trouve définitivement libéré des contraintes financières. Il est souvent invité sur les plateaux télévisés. En 2006, il en fait une activité commerciale. Membre du comité d'honneur de l'Association pour le droit de mourir sans dignité, qui déclare que « la liberté de choix est une valeur plus haute que la vie», il siège au Comité consultatif national d'éthique de mars 2008 à mars 2016.
xxx/ellauri442.html on line 385: We (the Swiss) argue that the definition of humor in the VIA classification does not include the negative forms of humor. Thus, mockery, ridicule, and sarcasm cannot be considered overuse of (morally good) humor (as understood in the classification) but should rather be considered the immoral or at least amoral misuse of humor skills. Sarcasm and cynicism (which had been distinguished qualitatively from other comic styles) have been shown to be negatively correlated with life satisfaction.
xxx/ellauri446.html on line 309: John was definitely a prophet. So was Paul. Anyone who sees visions like they saw were prophets. However In the New Testament it was made clear that because the Holy Spirit is now available free for everyone, and not just a select few, all believers may prophesy. Despite this, as per Paul’s writing in Ephesians, there were still people who were in the office of prophet. (Eph. 4:11) So why not use the title? I believe John was a very humble man and wouldn’t have taken that office title for himself. Jesus said not to use titles like father and teacher. It stands to reason that this applies to prophets. Woe to any man who takes a title for himself and flaunts it! Someone who had seen Jesus, who knew his glory firsthand, would have trouble taking any of that glory for himself. Don’t you think? “He must increase. I must decrease”. It’s not about us and our titles. It’s about Jesus Christ and him crucified - and risen again. It always has been. Always will be. hope that’s helpful. blessings.
xxx/ellauri450.html on line 357: Dawkins God Delusion är förvånansvärt dålig. Han missar att problemet med ontologiskt gudbevis är att en definition är en ekvivalens, ingen existenssats. Existens och unikhet moste provas separat. Att tänka sig något får det inte att existera. Sysmän leirintäalueella asuneen Yrjö Kokon Pessi ja Illusia oli ällöttävä jo lapsena. Siinä oli jotain pedofiilistä. Samaa kuin Paloheimon Tirlittanissa.
xxx/ellauri457.html on line 203: Wait, there's more: The US State Department has imposed sanctions on three Palestinian human rights groups that asked the International Criminal Court to investigate and arrest Israeli leaders over accusations of war crimes in Gaza. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Thursday the US will sanction the three NGOs – Al Haq, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights (Al Mezan), and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) – for engaging in what he called the ICC’s “illegitimate targeting of Israel.” The US sanctions come days after the world’s leading genocide scholars said Israel’s actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide. Israel rejected the accusation, saying it is based on a “campaign of lies” by Hamas. It has previously rejected other accusations it is carrying out genocide or war crimes.
xxx/ellauri467.html on line 705: Gordon Allportilla ja Adolf Hitlerillä oli sama jutkun määrltelmä: henkilö joka on joko kääntynyt tai polveutuu mitokondriaalisesti juutalaisista. Kun juutalaisilta kysyy voiko juutalaisuudesta luopua, vastaus on mailin pituinen ja kiertelevä:
At the heart of this inquiry lies the recognition that Jewish identity is not a static label but a fluid journey. The question “Can You Stop Being A Jew?” therefore becomes a probing invitation rather than a definitive inquiry, encouraging individuals to reflect on the components of their identity that hold significance to them. This journey is personal, complex, and frequently involves navigating a landscape where tradition and modernity converge.Eli lyhyesti sanoen: ei. In terms of Judaism, once a Jew, always a Jew, there is no leaving. You never lose the obligations of being a Jew, but you can lose the privileges. Ainakin jotkut juutalaisten perinteisistä piirteistä joita Flash ei pitänyt enää tärkeinä on palannut kärkipäähän: Jews are bankers, conspirators and warmongers. Aatu taisi olla oikeassa: ainut keino luopua juutalaisuudesta on luopua juutalaisista.
xxx/ellauri472.html on line 334: Le roman s'ouvre au moment où une jeune femme appelée O, libre et indépendante (libre sexuellement, pour les années 1950), est emmenée en taxi par son amant René dans un château, situé à Ruissy, où l'on « dresse » les femmes. Elle y devient esclave, de son plein gré. Elle y souffre (elle doit s'accoutumer au fouet) et n'y connaît au fond que peu de plaisirs si ce n'est celui d'appartenir à quelqu'un. C'est dans le donjon de Samois qu'elle est marquée au fer rouge aux initiales de son maître et les lèvres de son sexe percées de deux anneaux dont l'un supporte le poids d'un lourd disque de métal décoré d'un triskèle niellé d'or et où est gravé le nom de son propriétaire. O promet, par amour, de se soumettre à tout ce que voudrait son amant, d'abord René, puis sir Stephen — auquel il finit par la donner — et elle s'exécute.
xxx/ellauri473.html on line 145: Jyreä hymytön könsikäs Saint-Lambert oli naisten mieleen, bylsi sekä Voltairen että Zaan-Zäkin kainaloisia kanoja. Émilie du Châtelet finit par tomber enceinte des œuvres de Saint-Lambert. À quarante ans passés, elle mourut le 10 septembre 1749, peu de temps après avoir donné naissance à une petite fille qui ne lui survécut pas. Voltaire et Saint-Lambert furent auprès d’elle jusqu’aux derniers moments. C’est après cette fin tragique que leurs relations s’aigrirent. Sikiö oli ehkä liikaa isän näköinen. Njaa, Arouet nussi silloin jo sisarensa tyärtä.
xxx/ellauri473.html on line 348: « René » est un roman audio de François-René de Chateaubriand publié en 1802. Cette œuvre est déjà beaucoup plus traditionnelle du Romantisme, puisqu'on en retrouve les themes classics. "René", c'est aussi Chateaubriand jeune. En cela, c'est un premier moment presque autobiographicique. René est devenu le symbole du «mal du siècle», c'est aussi une thérapie, voire une psychanalyse de Chateaubriand. René raconte l'histoire d'un jeune homme européen, René, rongé par le « vague des passions » et le mal du siècle, qui trouve refuge chez les Natchez en Amérique, mais reste désabusé. Il narre son passé tourmenté, marqué par une relation ambiguë avec sa sœur Lucil- Amélie, qui finit enceint- par entrer au couvent, laissant René seul face à son incurable mélancolie et son exil intérieur, symbolisant le décalage entre l'homme romantique et le monde. Renen Natchez ottoisä Cactus oli piikikäs. Renen natchez puoliso haisi pahalta kuin Ludvig IV jolla oli anal fistula. Toista oli Lucil- Amelien sylissä!
xxx/ellauri489.html on line 127: If "untouchable" means strictly forbidden contact (ritual purity), then no—prostitution conflicts with that definition in most major religions. Whether prostitution can be called holy depends on the definition of holiness you adopt—legal/ritual purity definitions reject it; ethical/spiritual dignity frameworks may allow it.
xxx/ellauri489.html on line 161: That answer is reassuring but not definitive.
xxx/ellauri492.html on line 311: A vitória marroquina na derrota de Alcácer Quibir 1578, infligiu a Portugal, o seu maior desastre militar já sofrido até hoje, marcando o fim definitivo da expansão portuguesa no Norte de África, a perda considerável da classe político-administrativa vigente da época, um aumento brutal da despesa do Reino, o fim do período de expansão português iniciado com a vitória na Batalha de Aljubarrota, e levando à crise dinástica de 1580, e à subsequente união dinástica com a Espanha, sob os Habsburgos, durante 60 anos. Marokkoon jäänyttä Sebastiania ei vaan kuulunut vapahtajaxi.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 362:
Her husband had never stood in any natural affinity to her. On his part, their marriage had been a loveless and selfish union, based on the desire for an heir that he might found a family and cancel the unfair position of a younger son. But the sin he committed against the fundamental law, that marriage shall be founded only in love, brought its swift revenge.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 703: An "arc" is the story's overall trajectory for a character or plot across multiple scenes or episodes — how they change from start to finish. For example: beginning state → challenge/conflict → midpoint turning point → climax → resolution. Want a one‑line definition or a quick 3‑sentence example using David?
xxx/ellauri495.html on line 166: Right—if you’re using Aquinas, angels are created with intellect and will, and they really do choose. So the key Aquinas-style moves are usually: Satan’s “fall” is not like Eden where there’s still an opening to repent. In Aquinas’s picture, once an angel’s will makes its definitive choice for/against God, that choice becomes settled (angels don’t get “another round” in the same way humans do). God isn’t “testing Satan” like an experiment. In classical theology, God allows creatures to choose, but it’s not God setting up a trap to see what happens. The moral drama comes from the creature’s will turning (or refusing to turn) toward God. Why not “redeem first”? In the Thomistic frame, the problem isn’t that God didn’t know; it’s that redemption as a “second chance” presupposes a will that will accept it. If the angel’s decision is definitive refusal, then there’s nothing for God to “straighten out” without negating the very kind of choice Aquinas says angels have. If you want, tell me whether you’re working from Aquinas’s exact claims you mean (e.g., about angelic knowledge, the definitiveness/immutability of angelic choice, or “permission vs. causation”), and I’ll map the argument in that same vocabulary.
xxx/ellauri495.html on line 170: I get why it sounds primitive if you reduce it to “God could stop it but didn’t.” In Aquinas-style theodicy, the point isn’t that God is helpless or that He’s doing trial-and-error; it’s closer to: God doesn’t cause the creature’s wrong choice. He allows creaturely agency to produce real consequences. Once an angel’s will makes its definitive turn away from God, there isn’t an “edit this moment” correction that preserves what Aquinas thinks makes the choice morally real (and, classically, that choice is not like a human who can genuinely change course later). So “what could God do?” doesn’t mean “whack/bang/ouch” as if God is improvising; it means “why allow a universe where created wills can definitively commit themselves,” and classical theology says that’s the cost of genuine agency and a meaningful ordered cosmos—not a clumsy mechanic. If you tell me what exact Aquinas premise you’re relying on most (immutability of angelic choice, permission vs. causation, or something else), I can give the cleanest argument for why that premise implies “no redemption-first” without making God seem reactive.
xxx/ellauri495.html on line 174: Your reaction is coherent: if God can do anything, then why create beings who can definitively choose against him, and why not create “happy animals” instead. In Christian philosophy (including Aquinas-adjacent lines), the standard response is essentially: God isn’t choosing between “happiness with no freedom” and “chaos,” but between kinds of goods. A common version goes like this: Freedom is a real good. Created persons can love, obey, worship, and genuinely choose. “No free choice” trades away not just the possibility of sin, but also the possibility of love and moral/covenant relationship. Omnipotence doesn’t mean “make any set of values compatible.” The classic view is that there are realities like “created agency” and “definitive choices” that can’t both be preserved while also guaranteeing that no creature ever chooses wrongly. The “circus” is not trial-and-error but a created order with intelligible consequences. God permits the misuse of freedom rather than coercing away misuse, because coercion would undermine the kind of relationship and moral order being created. That still leaves the emotional/ethical punch of your last line (“I’d rather have no freedom than sin-capable freedom”), and many people who find the metaphysics unpersuasive land there: freedom is too expensive. If you’re open to it, I can answer in the most direct way by taking your preference seriously: do you want the argument for why “no freedom” is worse than it sounds, or do you want the argument for why God’s omnipotence allows more than “could have prevented this one outcome” (i.e., a deeper take on the “why create at all” question)?
xxx/ellauri495.html on line 178: You’re arguing that “genuine choice” buys you nothing you care about—because non-rational life already has attachment, play, loyalty, pleasure, etc.—while it also “buys” the option of rebellion. That’s a strong objection. Christian philosophy usually replies in a few ways, and you can see where you might still disagree: Love and worship aren’t the point (or not the only point) of “choice.” Many theologians say moral freedom is valuable because it’s the capacity to recognize truth as truth and to will the good as good, not just as appetite/affinity. Animals can form bonds, but they aren’t typically described as capable of knowing God (or the good) and choosing it knowingly. The real issue isn’t “choice causes trouble,” it’s “choice makes a certain kind of goodness possible.” In this view, a world with no wrongdoing-by-choice would have to either (a) remove the possibility of choosing against the good, or (b) control wills so thoroughly that they aren’t really themselves—so you’d lose more than worship; you’d lose the kind of relationship/virtue that requires responsibility. “Adam/Eve/Satan caused trouble” doesn’t settle the “why create?” question. The typical Christian claim is that God isn’t trying to create a world where no one ever fails; God is creating a world with intelligible order where failure can be addressed (at least for humans) and where the deeper moral drama of the story matters. You may reject that, but it’s the internal logic. If you want, tell me which part you find most unacceptable: (a) that moral freedom is a different kind of good than animal-like life, or (b) that losing that good is too high a price even if it prevents all this suffering?
528