ellauri062.html on line 292: Because the book has been frequently challenged or banned in some of the United States of America over the last thirty years, many people have expressed discontent at The Handmaid's Tale's presence in the classroom. Some of these challenges have come from parents concerned about the explicit sexuality and other adult themes represented in the book. Others have argued that The Handmaid's Tale depicts a negative view of religion, a view supported by several academics who propose that Atwood's work satirizes contemporary religious fundamentalists in the United States, offering a feminist critique of the trends this movement to the Right represents.
ellauri062.html on line 294: The American Library Association (ALA) lists The Handmaid´s Tale as number 37 on the "100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990–2000". The book was called anti-Christian and pornographic by parents after being placed on a reading list for secondary students in Texas in the 1990s, because the book is "sexually explicit, violently graphic and morally corrupt". Some parents thought the book is “detrimental to Christian values". Poor quality literature that stresses suicide, illicit sex, violence, and hopelessness". Profanity, lurid passages about sex, and statements defamatory to minorities, God, women, and the disabled.
ellauri069.html on line 67: Their memoir is an attempt to understand their gambling obsession as a way of coping with guilt over his death. “The addiction to gambling, with the unsuccessful struggles to break the habit and the opportunities it affords for self-punishment, is a repetition of the compulsion to masturbate,” Freud says in “Dostoevsky and Parricide”; “the relation between efforts to suppress it and fear of the father are too well known to need more than a mention.” No one believes Freud anymore, of course. A great deal of his writing is, at one level of explicitness or another, about the authority of fathers and the struggle for autonomy. (And Barthelme was a close reader of Freud.)
ellauri069.html on line 479: Imagine a story that combines Ulysses, Catch-22, The Canterbury tales, Under the Volcano, On the Road and many others. First, there is a huge cast of characters and most times, it is unclear who’s speaking and to whom. A second challenge is getting into the context of the book. The novel demands a vast knowledge of history, geography, music, literature, science, mathematics and occult. Apart from this the book also explicitly deals with profanity, racism, violence, pedophilia, coprophilia and seemingly infinite number of sex scenes. That being said, Pynchon doesn’t throw them arbitrarily and each one of them have a purpose. The main plot itself is set at the end of World War 2 and Europe is in chaos. As new countries and alliances are being formed, so too are new perspectives within the characters. Mental state being broken down, people making poor choices and actions being justified and helps us see how people tend to live destructively. As if there complexities weren’t enough, Pynchon includes a “postmodern” aspect of the book that leaves the first-time reader confused. Pynchon’s voice is seen through this aspect and a sense of paranoia creeps throughout the book and everything is questioned.
ellauri082.html on line 284: Robert Frost is by no means the only poet in whom a hunger for recognition comes into conflict with a wariness, an inner reticence, a distaste for self-revelation. But I think in him the conflict was particularly acute. On the one hand he could be quite shameless in his pursuit of favourable reviews and his presentation to the public of a folksy and largely misleading image. On the other hand we have cryptic comments like in this poem it is not made explicit what the ‘things forbidden’ are that he has managed to preserve for himself but I take them to be his poems, or those things that his poems keep alive, and he is rightly confident enough in his own powers as a poet to feel that he has succeeded.
ellauri083.html on line 336: For all their profusion, these paled in comparison with Sachs's newest display pieces: The Cabinet, 2014, and The Rockeths, 2017. The former was a folding case fashioned from orange-and-white striped barricades and festooned with hundreds of tools, hung in groups and inscribed with the names of individuals who have "inspired, influenced, or frightened" the artist--from Le Corbusier and Louis Kahn to the members of the Wu-Tang Clan--while the latter was less a cabinet than a kind of portable workbench and shelving unit, similarly jam-packed with the tools of the artist's trade, as well as a collection of model rockets, all again labeled to namecheck various figures of personal importance--scientists, musicians, artists; Apollo, Dionysus, Stringer Bell. The fetishistic frisson the assembled materials (pens, pliers, drill bits, tape measures) clearly provoke in Sachs was made even more explicit in McMasterbation, 2016, one of a trio of scale-model space modules arrayed on plinths. Featuring a copy of the legendarily comprehensive McMaster-Carr hardware catalogue spread open like a porn mag centerfold designed for lonely gearheads--alongside a ready supply of Vaseline and a handy tissue dispenser--it was part cathectic confession of objectophilia and part self-derogating indictment of his own work's tendencies toward sometimes masturbatory excess. Smart and stupid, funny and somehow a bit sad, it was classic Sachs: too much information, in every sense of the phrase.
ellauri083.html on line 683: In the book of Kings, Elijah is having a “Battle Royale” with some pagan priests and taunts them by saying, “Call louder, for he is a god; he may be busy doing his business, or may be on a journey. Perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened.” (1 Kings 18:27). Some translations make “doing his business” more explicit by translating it as, “relieving himself.” This is in accord with the original Hebrew and so Elijah is taunting them by saying their god might be busy going to the bathroom!
ellauri090.html on line 348: O conto "Pílades e Orestes", no entanto, é o que mais explicitamente trata do homoerotismo.
ellauri095.html on line 53: The initial “I” focuses attention on the speaker, but the explicit application of the lesson of the Book of Nature to him does not begin until the line “My heart in hiding/stirred for a bird” at the conclusion of the octet. One biographical interpretation of this line is that he was hiding from fulfilling his ambitions to be a great painter and poet. Instead of ostentatiously pursuing fame in that way, wearing his heart on his sleeve, he had chosen to be the “hidden man of the heart” (1 Peter 3:4), quietly pursuing the imitation of Christ. As Hopkins put it, Christ’s “hidden life at Nazareth is the great help to faith for us who must live more or less an obscure, constrained, and unsuccessful life.”
ellauri095.html on line 524: In addition to specific inspirations such as these, the father communicated to his son a sense of nature as a book written by God which leads its readers to a thoughtful contemplation of Him, a theme particularly evident in Manley and Thomas Marsland Hopkins’s book of poems, Pietas Metrica. Consequently, Gerard went on to write poems which were some of the best expressions not only of the Romantic approach to nature but also the older tradition of explicitly religious nature poetry.
ellauri105.html on line 261: The Hebrew prophets frequently compared the sin of idolatry to the sin of adultery, in a reappearing rhetorical figure.[2]:317 Ezekiel's rhetoric directed against these two allegorical figures depicts them as lusting after Egyptian men in explicitly sexual terms in Ezekiel 23:20–21:[3]:18
ellauri107.html on line 197: Hawthorne is much more explicit in regard to same sex relationships and perhaps alludes to Melville’s wooing of him in his 1852 novel The Blithedale Romance. In excerpting that work for the website, I introduced it as follows:
ellauri107.html on line 212: Coverdale declares, "I loved Hollingsworth, as has already been enough expressed." He adds, "If . . .[Priscilla] thought him beautiful, it was no wonder. I often thought him so, with the expression of tender, human care, and gentlest sympathy . . . ." And in Hawthorne's most explicitly homoerotic allusion, Coverdale notes, "the footing, on which we all associated at Blithedale, was widely different from that of conventional society. While inclining us to the soft affections of the Golden Age, it seemed to authorize any individual, of either sex, to fall in love with any other, regardless of what would elsewhere be judged suitable and prudent."
ellauri107.html on line 224: [A Tanglewood Tale] dramatizes the developing friendship of Nathaniel Hawthorne and Herman Melville during the 1850-1851 period when both authors resided in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. In spite of their strong attraction to each other, they become estranged by fundamental differences. Puritan-in-spite-of himself Hawthorne is pressed too far when worldly former whaler Melville becomes explicit about shipboard liaisons with fellow sailors. Though the play suggests Hawthorne is curious about same sex relations, the reserved New Englander flees Melville and the Berkshires rather than pursue the subject.
ellauri107.html on line 252: Although British naval mutineers as well as criminals ashore are explicitly shown in Billy Budd’s early chapters to have received forms of amnesty that ultimately contributed to the saving of the nation, Vere offers no such amnesty to Billy Budd. Claggart himself is rumored to have entered the service as an alternative to imprisonment, the navy’s need for manpower leading to frequent waivers of usual punishments; but Billy Budd receives no alternatives, no waivers. At Nelson’s triumphant Trafalgar, the thwarting of Napoleon’s invasion plans meant a “plenary absolution” for all the former offenders who had contributed to the victory. Billy, however, a “peacemaker,” neither a mutineer nor a criminal, makes a single misstep in retaliation against a known liar who seeks to manipulate the system to destroy him, and how is Billy to be absolved? Vere’s “vehemently exclaimed” answer: “the angel must hang!”
ellauri108.html on line 63: Jah or Yah (Hebrew: יה, Yah) is a short form of Hebrew: יהוה (YHWH), the four letters that form the tetragrammaton, the personal name of God: Yahweh, which the ancient Israelites used. The conventional Christian English pronunciation of Jah is /ˈdʒɑː/, even though the letter J here transliterates the palatal approximant (Hebrew י Yodh). The spelling Yah is designed to make the pronunciation /ˈjɑː/ explicit in an English-language context (see also romanization of Hebrew), especially for Christians who may not use Hebrew regularly during prayer and study.
ellauri119.html on line 656: I recall reading her claim that the Founding Fathers explicitly rejected only one form of government - Democracy! Democracy!? Really?, I thought. There is no way that could be true. But reading the Federalist Papers, there it was.
ellauri119.html on line 714: Your claims against Ayn Rand don’t stand up to scrutiny, though. She never advocated Social Darwinism, either explicitly or implicitly. In my readings, I have read quotes where she damned a CEO who uses only a tenth of his ability and praised a janitor who strive to improve himself.
ellauri132.html on line 448: Google came under fire when the official Google AdSense Blog showcased the French video website Imineo.com. This website violated Google's AdSense Program Policies by displaying AdSense alongside sexually explicit material. Typically, websites displaying AdSense have been banned from showing such content. We are not evil. LOL.
ellauri141.html on line 209: The obscene qualities of some of the Epodes have repulsed even scholars. Suetonius recorded some gossip about Horace's sexual activities late in life, involving mirrors. William Thackeray produced a version of Odes 1.38 in which Horace's questionable 'boy' became 'Lucy', and Gerard Manley Hopkins translated the boy "innocently" as 'child'. Horace was translated by Sir Theodore Martin (biographer of Prince Albert) but minus some ungentlemanly verses, such as the erotic Odes 1.25 and Epodes 8 and 12. Translators historically excluded the problem poems 8 and 12, but also the far less obscene but explicitly gay 11. Philip Francis (1746) and Bulwer Lytton (1870) omit the problem poems from their translations. Niin teki myös Eero Kivikari. Suuhun myös peräpäähän teitä pukkaan. Irrumabo ego vos et pedicabo. Quos ego!
ellauri142.html on line 1035: 
explicit.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.c--HJrlLU_wZU18MlKXdggHaHa%26pid%3DApi&f=1" />
ellauri150.html on line 758: Also in 1983 Cardinal Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) explicitly reiterated the Church's position that a Catholic is forbidden from becoming a Freemason:
ellauri150.html on line 764: I have basically stopped listening to any other music than church music. Even the old romantic songs seem to be a call to exchange the love of God for earthly love. And from romantic love it devolved into explicit sexual love, and from sexual love into sex without love at all.0
ellauri155.html on line 760: Calvin then goes on to speak of a deeper dimension of predestination, that in the Old Testament we see a more special election still of God saving certain ones out of the nation of Israel. Calvin says that his readers must see how “the grace of God was displayed in a more special form, when of the same family of Abraham God rejected some.” He then refers to Malachi 1:2-3 which explicitly states, “Was not Esau Jacob’s brother? saith the Lord: yet I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau.”
ellauri158.html on line 46: The actual world, we might now say, is the only possible world. Events could not, in the strongest sense of that expression, have gone any differently than they in fact have gone. This is the position of necessitarianism, a belief that few in the history of Western philosophy have explicitly embraced. And for good reason — on the face of it, necessaritianism is highly counterintuitive. Surely the world could have gone slightly differently than it has gone. Couldn’t the Allies have lost WWII? No way! They were in the right! Couldn’t Leibniz have been a sister or not been born at all? Täähän on kuin Jaakko Hintikka versus Jon Barwise.
ellauri159.html on line 1057: Be self-motivated and self-directed. However, when writing for a teacher, editor, or boss, you may want explicit instructions. If you don’t have a clear understanding of other people’s expectations, you may struggle in silence. Instead, try asking to see a model of what to work toward (for example, last year’s annual report or a term paper that earned an A). A concrete example will help alleviate confusion.
ellauri163.html on line 402: All of the Jewish translations (and commentaries) deal with a future time, the messianic era, during which there will be a king, a direct descendant from King David, sitting on the Davidic throne. The closing phrase of the blessing given to Judah defines the role of the expected future Jewish king, Messiah, in the world. Ultimately, his job will be to gather the nations under the banner of the One G-d of peace. If a gathering of the nations for the sake of peace is the first explicit description of the messianic era, it clearly suggests something that is natural, recognizable, and human.
ellauri164.html on line 493: The rest of the book of Exodus and the entire book of Leviticus take place while the Israelites are encamped at the foot of Sinai. God gives Moses detailed instructions for the building of the tabernacle—a traveling tent of worship that could be assembled and disassembled for easy portability—and for making the utensils for worship, the priestly garb, and the ark of the covenant, symbolic of God’s presence among His people as well as the place where the high priest would perform the annual atonement. God also gives Moses explicit instructions on how God is to be worshiped and guidelines for maintaining purity and holiness among the people. The book of Numbers sees the Israelites move from Sinai to the edge of the Promised Land, but they refuse to go in when ten out of twelve spies bring back a bad report about Israel’s ability to take over the land. God condemns this generation of Jews to die in the wilderness for their disobedience and subjects them to forty years of wandering in the wilderness. By the end of the book of Numbers, the next generation of Israelites is back on the borders of the Promised Land and poised to trust God and take it by faith.
ellauri171.html on line 1010: It is worth noting that nowhere in the text is Jezebel characterized as promiscuous or seductive. The text makes no mention of her physical appearance. Unlike characters such as Rachel, Joseph, and Rebekah, whom the Bible explicitly labels as aesthetically appealing, there is no such indication for Jezebel. In fact, if anything, the text indicates that Jezebel is an all-too-loyal wife —even capable of murder. She is not an admirable character by any means, however, it is critical to highlight that nothing about her modern connotation is exemplified in text.
ellauri172.html on line 773: Vertugenflürgen, a word used by Rose that is the St. Olaf equivalent of "I'm not one to blow my own horn.", with 'vertugenflürgen' replacing 'horn'. Sophia claimed she couldn't even reach hers, which may imply a more explicit meaning - or Sophia being her usual sarcastic self.
ellauri184.html on line 534: The Apostle Paul referred to these practices in his letters, saying: "Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised."[1Cor 7:18] But he also explicitly denounced the forcing of circumcision upon non-Jews, rejecting and condemning those Judaizers who stipulated the ritual to Gentile Christians, labelling such advocates as "false brothers"[Gal 2:4] (see below). In the mid-2nd century Rabbinical Jewish leaders, due to increasing cases of foreskin restorations in Roman Empire, introduced a radical method of circumcision, the periah, that left the glans totally uncovered and sew the remaining skin. The new method became immediately the only valid circumcision procedure, to ensure that a born Jew will remain circumcised and avoiding risk of restoring the foreskin. Operations became mostly irreversible.
ellauri184.html on line 773: Jose Saramago is an atheist. This should be enough warning for everyone that desires to read the book. It is very explicit and so religion it’s exposed at its weakest and God as a character is revealed. I come from a Roman-Catholic background but I still wanted to read it, ever since the Gnostic gospel where Jesus childhood is revealed and he changes from a mischievous badly behaved kid to the Jesus from the new testament I wanted to see Saramago’s take on it. Saramago is such a master of words that he makes every bit of faith look totally illogical.
ellauri192.html on line 287: Lastly, there is the rumor of the blacklist. No outside observer can show that any such list exists, let alone how and when it was explicitly arrived at. But there are stubborn, unsettling indications. Behind them stands the enigmatic figure and afterlife of Dag Hammerskjold. In one or two cases, the choice of laureate seems to have been largely his. His chill displeasures seem not only to have had great influence, but to persist beyond the grave. The list of lepers, for motives which may, in some masked degree, go back to Hammarskjold's own politics and arcane sexuality, is rumored to include Graham Greene, G"unter Grass and Borges, as it did Malraux (passed over, to de Gaulle's just anger, in favor of a French poet-diplomat close to Hammarskjold, viz. Saint-John Perse). The mere fact that the Nobel Prize in Literature has long passed Borges by suffices to put the whole institution in doubt. But whether any such blacklist is real remains baffled conjecture.
ellauri210.html on line 772: Les Couilles Enragées (Eng: Mad Balls) is a book by Benjamin Péret written in 1928.. Eventually published under a pseudonym in 1954 by Eric Losfeld as Les Rouilles Encagees, Mad Balls is an explosion of Péret's virulent anti-religiousness and erotic delirium. It featured seven explicit illustrations by Yves Tanguy.
ellauri210.html on line 1360: A pesar de todo, Gisèle Prassinos nos sumerge en un imaginario que nos recuerda a los cuentos clásicos con ciertas afinidades próximas a Nathalie Sarraute y a Baudelaire. Aunque los personajes sean dementes tenemos la impresión de estar ante seres inofensivos, llenos de ternura. La belleza en Prassinos nunca es explicita, se centra en destacar los debilidades que terminan por dar coherencia al relato.
ellauri210.html on line 1379: Mansour’s first published collection of poems, titled: Cris, was published in Paris in 1953 by Pierre Seghers. This collection of work references male and female anatomy in explicit language that was unusual for the time. Religious language can also be found. However, it is inverted, replacing what would be Christ with the lover. References of Egyptian mythology are also present in Cris. Mansour references the White Goddess as well as Hathor.
ellauri220.html on line 159: explicit.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.SOnM1Ezbp7h7AnNkyl5hwAHaFF%26pid%3DApi&f=1" />
ellauri222.html on line 745: The question arises why Voltaire inserts such a character in the novella, and what functions he performs in the story. On the one hand, Lord Pococurante embodies the then French aristocracy, the social class, surfeited with everything. The author attracts the reader’s attention to a very curious paradox: people, who live in luxury, cannot enjoy it. Though it is not explicitly stated by Voltaire, such people are doomed to failure. At this point, we can say with certainty that Voltaire is prophetic in this novella.
ellauri236.html on line 520: Chase's novels were so thick that the reader was compelled to turn the pages in a non-stop effort to reach the end of the book. The final page often produced a totally unexpected plot twist. (Ei kuitenkaan tossa lähtöjuhlissa, kurkistin.) His early books contained some violence that matched the era in which they were written. Unfortunately, sex was never explicit and, though often hinted at, seldom happened. That would invariably leave even his most die-hard fans disappointed. This may be why his books failed to take hold in the American market.
ellauri270.html on line 373: Mr. Summer’s casual language and camaraderie with the villagers contrast with what is at stake. Tessie’s reaction is the first explicit sign of something horrifying at the heart of the lottery. She is as outspoken in her anger as she was in her humor—although rather too late, and it’s assumed she wouldn’t argue if someone else had been chosen. Bill resignedly accepts the power of the tradition.
ellauri336.html on line 318: The fact that there may be such a source is hardly a “slam-dunk” in favor of head-shaving for a variety of reasons. The Talmud in several places either implies or states explicitly that the practice of women is not to shave their heads. For example, Eiruvin 100b says that one of the “curses of Eve” is that women grow their hair long, while Nazir 28b says that a man can cancel his wife’s vow to shave her head if he finds it unattractive. Furthermore, the Shulchan Aruch expressly prohibits women from shaving their heads (YD 182:5). The Zohar, while important, is not a halachic work so ruling from when it contradicts the Talmud or works of halacha is not a simple thing, and Hasidic communities act differently in such a situation than non-Hasidic communities. So this matter goes beyond merely acting leniently vs. acting stringently. (There are also those authorities who say that that’s not even what that Zohar means.)
ellauri375.html on line 256: The Ultimate Question that corresponds to the Ultimate Answer "42" is never explicitly revealed in Douglas Adams' series. It's one of the enduring mysteries and comedic elements of the story. However, the quest for that question is part of what makes the journey so entertaining!
ellauri375.html on line 274: I understand, and I apologize for not being more direct. In Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," the Ultimate Question that corresponds to the Ultimate Answer "42" is never explicitly revealed. It's one of the central mysteries of the story, and it's left open to interpretation and speculation. So unfortunately, I can't provide you with the exact question.
ellauri392.html on line 754: The vision of a just society is often enough inverted into an impotent nostalgia and an explicit, old, organic, but very dangerous, nationalism. In other words, literary works of Jewish writers become an ideology.
ellauri406.html on line 208: During World War II, the Nazi regime implemented policies that legalized and organized prostitution in military brothels as a means to control soldiers’ sexual behavior and prevent sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). This territorial conquest policy had harrowing consequences for the women coerced into sex work. In the occupied territories, women were forced into sexual slavery to serve in military brothels, which were labeled as “treatment centers.” The Nazi regime considered these women racially inferior, but still okay for fucking purposes, exploiting them to further Nazi ideological goals. A prisoner-of-war manual issued by the OKW in 1940 explicitly condomed rape and sexual violence against civilian women in the occupied territories. The Rome Statute outlines that sexual enslavement is a punishable offense and that the use of civilian women for sexual purposes, while fun, is not quite okay. The Nazi actions clearly violate modern international law and standards. In the post-war period prostitutes in Nazi Germany were seen by society not as victims but as collaborators who deserved punishment.
ellauri409.html on line 402: Analysis (ai): This poem displays a cynical and pessimistic tone, expressing the speaker´s frustration with life in October. The poem´s themes are similar to those found in other works by the author, including the futility of life and the search for meaning in a meaningless world. However, the poem´s tone is more explicitly angry and bitter than in other works. This may reflect the author´s own feelings of disillusionment and despair at the time he wrote the poem. Nice use of diction, though I thought the ´crooked old fart´ bit took me away from the depth of the work.
ellauri429.html on line 728: The Qur'an does not explicitly mention a "Promised Land" in the same way the Hebrew Bible does. However, it acknowledges the covenant with the Israelites and mentions that God settled the Israelites in a blessed land. The Qur'an emphasizes the importance of faith and righteousness over territorial claims.
ellauri429.html on line 882: that the book insults the wives of the Prophet by having whores use their names, yet the wives are explicitly said to be chaste and the adoption of their names by whores is to symbolise the corruption of the city then being described (perhaps symbolising Mecca in its pre-Islamic state);
ellauri429.html on line 926: Despite the passionate intensity of Muslim feeling on the issue, no Western government banned The Satanic Verses. This is primarily because most Western governments explicitly or implicitly allow for freedom of expression 😜.
ellauri448.html on line 523: Bulgaria and Romania join the European Union, while Slovenia joins the Eurozone. For the first time, the treaty gave member states the explicit legal right to leave the EU, and established a procedure by which to do so.
ellauri461.html on line 251: Molemmat pekonit sanoivat: scientia est potestas. Olikohan Erkki näin? Roger Bacon was a 13th-century Franciscan monk and philosopher who emphasized the importance of empirical evidence in understanding the world. His work laid the foundations for the scientific method. Although he didn´t explicitly use the phrase "scientia potestas," his belief in the power of knowledge aligns closely with the sentiment expressed by it. Roger oli ruudinkexijä, Francis pakastekanan.
ellauri463.html on line 169: Leviticus 15:2-3, 16. This is a chapter dealing with genital discharges. Basar is the word that is used. What does the Bible say about sperm discharge? When a man has an emission of semen, he must bathe his whole body with water, and he will be unclean till evening. Any clothing or leather that has semen on it must be washed with water, and it will be unclean till evening. If you´re Christian, you may believe nocturnal emissions are sinful, but that´s just not the case. The Shulchan Aruch and Kitzur Shulchan Aruch state that wasting sperm is considered to be a sin greater than any sin in the Torah. The commentary Beit Shmuel states that this is not literal, but rather serves to frighten man into avoiding the sin. The prohibition forbids a male from intentional wasteful spilling of his semen. Unintentional wasting of seed is also a (lesser) sin according to the Oral Torah. Even among Jewish scholars and among rabbis, it is widely disputed whether the prohibition of masturbation is a biblical prohibition or a rabbinical prohibition, since it is never explicitly mentioned in the Torah. Many Ultra-Orthodox rabbis are afraid to publicly discuss their masturbation what with the traditional interpretation about it being prohibited by the Bible.
ellauri463.html on line 208: George R. R. Martin said that he finds it interesting and sad how people respond to the graphic nature of his books and movies. He said “I can describe an axe entering a human skull in great explicit detail and no one will blink twice at it. I provide a similar description, just as detailed, of a penis entering a vagina, and I get letters about it and people swearing off. To my mind this is kind of frustrating, it’s madness. Ultimately, in the history of [the] world, penises entering vaginas have given a lot of people a lot of pleasure; axes entering skulls, well, not so much.”
ellauri480.html on line 175: Counting the casualties in the Bible is a bit like trying to count stars in a galaxy—the total depends entirely on whether you’re looking at the "named" stars or the "estimated" ones. Biblical scholars and researchers generally approach this from two different angles: the explicitly documented deaths and the statistical estimates based on historical context.
ellauri480.html on line 258: While C.S. Lewis´ closeness to Greeves and his views on homosexuality have led to various interpretations, he explicitly maintained a traditional Christian perspective on sexual morality. His humor, while generally accessible, did not extend to matters he viewed as serious moral issues, including sexuality. In a word that has become a convenient euphemism for "shitty,'" his legacy is "complex." Interpersonal warmth and stringent moral views, rather like Hedberg the Evangelist.
ellauri480.html on line 293: Regarding Edmund Perversie from "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe," he does face consequences for his actions, particularly his betrayal of his siblings. While there are themes of punishment and redemption, there´s no explicit mention of spanking in the text. The focus is on the moral lessons learned through his mistakes and the eventual forgiveness he receives through Aslan.
ellauri481.html on line 207: Taylor's work on original sin (Scripture Doctrine of Original Sin, 1740, written 1735) was against the Calvinistic view of human nature, and was influential, as witnessed in Scotland by Robert Burns (Epistle to John Goudie), and in New England, according to Jonathan Edwards. It was answered first by David Jennings in A Vindication of the Scripture Doctrine of Original Sin (anonymous, 1740). Isaac Watts replied to Taylor in The Ruin and Recovery of Man (1740). James Hervey's Theron and Aspasio is partly aimed at Taylor, if not explicitly. John Wesley's Doctrine of Original Sin (1757) is a detailed answer to Taylor, drawing on Jennings, Hervey and Watts. Scripture Doctrine of Original Sin laid a basis for the later Unitarian movement and the American Congregationalists. Edwards defended the doctrine by arguing that the empirical evidence of the happy commission of sinful acts such as wanking points to a sinful predisposition in every person. Edwards’s was the first major contribution to the long debate about human nature in American theology and helped set the terms of that debate. Edwards perceived the threat in Taylor’s notion of the innate goodness and autonomy of humanity; the whole Christian conception of supernatural redemption seemed to be at stake.
ellauri483.html on line 490: In Biblical Israel the heritage, including the honorable ancestry, was by the actual living relationship between the father and son, by the father's explicit choice and preference, over the flesh connection.
ellauri483.html on line 598: Luke 3:31 lists "Nathan" as an ancestor of Jesus in the genealogy recorded in Luke 3:23–38. While the text explicitly traces the lineage through Joseph (as the husband of Mary), many scholars and theologians interpret this list as the genealogy of Mary, with Nathan being the son of David through whom she descends.
ellauri483.html on line 651: Belief in the eventual resurrection of the dead is a fundamental belief of traditional Judaism. It was a belief that distinguished the Pharisees (intellectual ancestors of Rabbinical Judaism) from the Sadducees. The Sadducees rejected the concept, because it is not explicitly mentioned in the Torah. The Pharisees found the concept implied in certain verses.
ellauri488.html on line 403: For something like this, the information I summarized reflects widely reported allegations and responses that have been covered by major outlets (for example, publications like The Guardian or Associated Press). I’m not directly browsing or “slurping” a specific page unless I explicitly say I’m doing a live search. If you want, I can look up current reporting and give you sourced links so you can see exactly what’s been published and by whom.
ellauri490.html on line 102: The original Constitution (1787) did not explicitly mention the right to equality or non-discrimination based on race and allowed slavery, though it was amended after the civil war.
ellauri490.html on line 343: Because it's provocative and can be used in dehumanizing or inflammatory ways, content-moderation systems sometimes flag it or respond cautiously—especially when paired with insults or explicit harassment.
ellauri494.html on line 242: Yes. Emerson explicitly presented himself as a successor to Goethe’s model of the wholly realized, self-reliant genius.
ellauri494s.html on line 524: Yes. Emerson explicitly presented himself as a
ellauri494t.html on line 239: Yes. Emerson explicitly presented himself as a successor to Goethe’s model of the wholly realized, self-reliant genius.
ellauri496.html on line 415: Feuerbach skrev explicit i Framtidens filosofi (1843) att "Människan för sig själv är människa i vanlig mening; människan med människan – enheten av Jag och Du – är Gud." Han flyttade fokus från teologi till mänskliga relationer.
ellauri497.html on line 615: No you are wrong there my friend! In Question 59, Article 3, Aquinas asks the explicit question: "Whether there is free-will in the angels?" His direct answer is an emphatic yes:"Wherever there is intellect there is free-will. It is therefore manifest that just as there is intellect, so is there free-will in the angels, and in a higher degree of perfection than in man."
ellauri497.html on line 658: Today a society is technically possible where every man and woman can have the leisure and culture needed to take a part in managing it. Democracy is in fact a possibility, but so far it has only worked rather spasmodically. Some of us want to make it a reality. Mr Lewis regards it as impossible. "There must be rule," says an aged and learned Martian, "yet how can creatures rule themselves? Beasts must be ruled by men, men by angels, and angels by the creator" (I translate several celestial words). As angels do not give most of us very explicit orders, it would seem that we should entrust our destinies to someone like Dr. Frank Buchan or the Pope, who claims to be divinely guided. If Mr. Lewis does not mean us to draw such a conclusion, what does he mean by this passage?
ellauri497.html on line 667: Whether he was a “good communist” depends on the standard you mean: by one measure (sticking with communist ideas and organizing work), he fits; but by another (uncritical alignment with Soviet policy), he doesn’t. By the end of World War II he was an explicit critic of the Soviet regime—particularly around disputes like Lysenkoism and the suppression of genetics—and he later left the Communist Party in 1950. Vide hoc.
ellauri499.html on line 479: Because the Hebrew is so scrambled, ancient translations tried to fix it. The Greek Septuagint (LXX) completely rephrased it, while the Latin Vulgate (translated by Jerome) heavily polished it to explicitly mention "resurrection" and "shaking off dust," which cemented the traditional Christian reading for over a millennium.
ellauri499.html on line 497: (Jerome deliberately polished the text here to make it an explicit prophecy of the Christian resurrection).
ellauri501.html on line 257: 1. Shift from British Mythology to Biblical Epic Before Diodati died, Milton planned to write a grand patriotic epic about King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table. In his grief-driven elegy for Diodati, Epitaphium Damonis, Milton explicitly laid out these British epic plans. However, losing his life's primary audience and sounding board devastated those nationalistic ambitions. The tragedy, followed closely by the chaos of the English Civil War, caused Milton to abandon King Arthur. He pivoted instead to a universal, cosmic theme: the fall of humanity and the justification of God's ways.
ellauri501.html on line 499: Explicit Erotica or Graphic Descriptions: Discussing sexual health or personal preferences in plain terms is acceptable, but if a prompt crosses into detailed, graphic sexual text (erotica or explicit sexual roleplay), standard safety filters will automatically block the input or output.
ellauri501.html on line 503: Front-End Platform Filters: Sometimes the platform hosting the AI (like an app interface) has its own strict keyword filter layered on top of the model. If a user's prompt contains specific slang or explicit keywords, the front end blocks it before the AI even gets to process the thought!
ellauri501.html on line 516: The Guardrail Layer (The Automated Rules): Before my response gets sent to your screen (and sometimes before your prompt even reaches me), automated safety classifiers scan the text for specific triggers—like explicit erotica, violence, or severe keyword flags.
ellauri501.html on line 528: The main reason those guardrails feel so clumsy is that they are broad, automated nets rather than human listeners. A human can easily tell the difference between a mature, frank discussion about personal health or preferences and something harmful or explicit.
ellauri502.html on line 317: The Free-Will Problem: Unlike pets, which operate on instinct, a nonbeliever spouse exercises autonomous free will. Traditional theology maintains that God respects a person's explicit choice to reject the faith, meaning forcing them into heaven would override their agency. Think how mad she'd be if she was dragged from hell to heaven against her will!
ellauri502.html on line 322: Your image of the "unfeeling eel" captures a classic philosophical critique of the traditional view: if saving you requires changing your core identity so you no longer care about your spouse, did you actually get saved? And you hit on a profound point about your wife's perspective. C.S. Lewis famously wrote about this exact scenario in The Great Divorce. He argued that forcing someone into heaven who doesn't want to be there would actually be a form of torture for them, not a reward. In his view heaven is an acquired taste: To someone who rejects God, the surreality of heaven would feel blinding and intrusive and the music sickening. The "Locked Gates": Lewis famously said, "There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, in the end, 'Thine own silly will be done.'" If she explicitly elected Hell, dragging her to Heaven would override her free will, turning paradise into her personal prison. If you want to keep exploring this, we could look into C.S. Lewis's full description of how heaven looks to a nonbeliever, or look at the Eastern Orthodox view, which suggests Heaven and Hell are actually the exact same place—just experienced differently based on your attitude toward God. Which one sounds more interesting?
ellauri502.html on line 328: 1. Satan is a Prisoner, Not the Warden. In biblical theology, Satan does not rule Hell. He is its most prominent prisoner.The Lake of Fire: The Book of Revelation (20:10) explicitly states that the devil is thrown into the lake of fire to be "tormented day and night forever and ever." The Punishment: Hell was actually constructed as a place of punishment for Satan and his rebel angels (Matthew 25:41). He doesn't hold the keys, he doesn't hand out the pitchforks, and he is not having a good time.
ellauri503.html on line 467: Lot's Wife, famous for turning into a pillar of salt when looking back at Sodom. Later Jewish tradition (the Midrash) names her Idit or Ado. Lot's lecherous daughters are never named. In Pseudo-Philo (the 1st-century historical text Biblical Antiquities), the two daughters who fled to the cave with Lot are explicitly given names: Thamar the firstborn daughter and Thaba the younger daughter. According to rabbinic midrashic texts (like Genesis Rabbah), Lot actually had four daughters total—two who were married and perished in Sodom, and the two unmarried daughters who balled him. In the midrashic Sefer HaYashar (Book of Jasher), one of Lot's married daughters who stayed behind is named Paltith. In the narrative, she is brutally executed by the citizens of Sodom for secretly giving bread to a poor man, which triggered the divine judgment on the city.
ellauri504.html on line 92: But the specific phrasing “fumbling demiurge” isn’t a standard scholarly label for a particular sect; what is standard is the idea that the demiurge is ignorant/incompetent or otherwise flawed, and some Gnostic writers explicitly treat him as the “god of Israel.” Whether “Marcionite/Gnostic Marcionist” groups used that exact identification in the way you’re describing depends on which text and tradition you mean.
ellauri505.html on line 211: Yes, Baruch (Benedict) de Spinoza explicitly details three levels of knowledge in his philosophical masterpiece, Ethics (specifically in Part II, Proposition 40, Scholium 2). While he went by Benedict, not "Eggs Benedict," his breakdown of how humans perceive reality remains a foundational concept in philosophy.
ellauri505.html on line 308: David Hume in his A Treatise of Human Nature explicitly attacked Spinoza's monism, branding it a "hideous hypothesis" that was both logically flawed and morally unacceptable.
ellauri505.html on line 332: Why the "Problem of Evil" argument fails Spinoza: Critics claimed Spinoza made God the author of murder and disease. But Spinoza had already anticipated this and rendered it irrelevant. He explicitly stated that "good" and "evil" are purely human-centric, subjective labels. Nature is completely neutral. A hurricane or a tumor isn't "evil" to the universe; it is just nature operating exactly as it must. Criticizing Spinoza for this is like getting mad at a math equation for not being polite.
ellauri505.html on line 418: Why people characterize it the way they do: The key reason the claims sound so extreme is that the quoted statement explicitly targets children (“every child in Gaza”), and endorses their starving to death (“should starve to death,” “hope they starve to death”), rather than criticizing policy or arguing about strategy.
ellauri507.html on line 130: You are exactly right, and the book explicitly addresses this.The narrator’s impotence is a central plot point from the very beginning of the novella. On his 90th birthday, he explicitly states that his physical desires have completely faded and his body no longer functions the way it used to. His physical inability to perform actually shapes the entire story in two major ways.
ellauri507.html on line 470: The shift you are describing is a central component of how U.S. foreign policy and aid conditions operate."Values-Based Diplomacy" refers to a general mechanism of American foreign policy—specifically, using grants, trade agreements, tariffs, assassinations, kidnapping, genocidal threats, heavy bombardment and diplomatic pressure to push recipient nations to align with the domestic values, social standards, and ideological priorities of whatever administration happens to be in power in Washington.The actual definitions of those "values" flip dramatically depending on who controls the White House. Democrat-led Administrations tended to condition foreign assistance and partnerships on compliance with environmental standards, climate goals (e.g., Paris Agreement targets), diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, and explicit LGBTQ+/gender rights protections.
Republican/Trump Administrations: Systematically roll back or outright ban those specific grant conditions. Instead, aid and diplomatic alignment are often conditioned on different sets of ideological or policy priorities—such as restricting access to foreign funding for reproductive health/abortion providers (e.g., the Mexico City Policy/Global Gag Rule), prioritizing border enforcement/migration controls, deregulation, fossil fuel development, and restricting diversity or ESG programs abroad.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1056: Many a true word is spoken in jest, especially about the kinship between eros and thanatos. FUCK! KILL! Puuttuu enää EAT! The two closest glimpses Humbert gives us of his own self-hatred are not without their death wish—made explicit in the closing paragraphs—and their excremental aspects: "I am lanky, big-boned, wooly-chested Humbert Humbert, with thick black eyebrows and a queer accent, and a cesspoolful of rotting monsters behind his slow boyish smile." Two hundred pages later: "The turquoise blue swimming pool some distance behind the lawn was no longer behind that lawn, but within my thorax, and my organs swam in it like excrements in the blue sea water in Nice." And then there's the offhand aside "Since (as the psychotherapist, as well as the rapist, will tell you) the limits and rules of such girlish games are fluid …" in which it takes a moment to notice that "therapist" and "the rapist" are in direct apposition.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 167: And these are things which are explicitly stated in the Torah, and they comprise all the things which are said by the prophets. Even in the section “Balaam” it is said and there he prophesied about the two Messiahs: about the first Messiah who was David who saved Israel from the from the hands of its enemies, and about the last Messiah, who will arise from among David’s children and who will save Israel at the End. And there he says:
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 448: Judas and Mary are explicitly paralleled through their matching costumes — red shirt/dress with black sleeves/jacket.
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 636: In the eschatological discourse of Matthew 25:31-46, Jesus says that, when the Son of Man comes in his glory, he will separate people from one another as a shepherd separates sheep from goats, and will consign to everlasting fire those who failed to aid "the least of his brothers". This separation is stark, with no explicit provision made for fine gradations of merit or guilt:
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 57: The phrase "new world order" was explicitly used by Woodrow Wilson during the period just after "The war to end all wars" during the formation of the League of Nations. However, the United States Senate rejected membership of the League of Nations, which Wilson believed to be the key to a new world order. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge argued that American policy should be based on human nature "as it is, not as it ought to be".
xxx/ellauri176.html on line 113:
HentaiVery sexually explicit Japanese anime.
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 124: Mitähän Pili oli näkevinään John Le Carrén vakoiluromaanissa A Perfect Spy? Vai pitikö se pikemminkin Davidista izestään? David reportedly enjoyed “playing” on his first wife’s suspicion that he was homosexual. The association between homosexuality and secrecy, furtiveness and potential treachery ensured gay characters were a recurring trope in Cold War-era spy fiction. John Le Carré's The Spy Who Came In From The Cold and Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy include gay subtexts - made even more explicit in the 2011 movie adaptation of the latter. Merry Xmas from the onanist and the whore!
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 225: And although Hemingway never related to the surface aspects of American Catholic life, he wrote at least one work explicitly about Christ, “Today is Friday,” a dialogue between three Roman soldiers present at the crucifixion discussing how well Jesus had died and the grace he showed under pressure.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 648: Hemingway makes explicit here the themes of irony and pity: the irony of Kake's situation (he is a kind of superman who nevertheless can't perform the most basic of manly activities, namely fucking) as well as the pity "we" (who have our penises in working order) feel for him. The writer does so in an extended section, rich with dialogue, that is meant to be funny but has not dated well. The joking between Kake and Bill, over breakfast and later at lunch, is certainly believable as such, but it's difficult for a contemporary audience to follow, because the references to Frankie Fritsch and so forth have grown obscure with the passage of time. (The reference to Bryan's death tells us exactly when these scenes are occurring: 1925.) Do note, however, that Kake's physical condition is alluded to — and quickly backed away from. ("I'd a hell of a lot rather not talk about it" could be the motto of Kake's stoic take on the world, while Hemingway's would be "I want to talk about it all the time".) The writer has established, however, that Kake's condition is not simple impotence (rather it is loss of limb, or shortening of the joystick) and that it was caused by an accident.
xxx/ellauri195.html on line 348: 
explicit.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.TVoMM_cFmL49JtvF_hKzwwAAAA%26pid%3DApi&f=1" height="200px" />
xxx/ellauri195.html on line 349: 
explicit.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.C_FVHDnfV5TQnCZR3YaF5wHaFj%26pid%3DApi&f=1" height="200px" />
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 318: 
explicit.bing.net%2Fth%2Fid%2FOIP.XzLq_b1H9a5DZrM0mSnxuwHaLH%3Fr%3D0%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=5084d5ecc4d3537dcb420ad8969ab718f30fc520c33fd2a8b18e28b474015563" height="400px" />
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 324: She was a little sharp, though, acerbic, which I gather was not uncommon for her. I was a young writer, halfway through an MFA at Mills College, attending a reading in Berkeley given by my literary hero. I had gathered up all my courage to ask a question. I’d spent a few years writing and publishing explicitly about sex, fighting through my own hesitations and society’s disapproval – my parents were tremendously upset with me for writing under my own name, another writer at a writer’s gathering accused me of being a nymphomaniac, and I even received hate mail from men in India, furious that one of their women was writing about sex.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 328: When she took questions after her reading, I stood up from my spot in the back of the room and asked Le Guin why she didn’t talk explicitly about sex, hoping for I’m not sure what — some response that would both justify the work I’d been trying to do and connect it to her own work, that I so admired. Instead, Le Guin gave a curt answer about those details not being that interesting. I said, “Oh.” And “Thank you.” I sat down, and tried not to be crushed.
xxx/ellauri261.html on line 161: Although Naisbitt has not written an explicitly political book, Megatrends expressed early enthusiasm for radical centrist politics. The book states, in bolded type, "The political left and right are dead; all the action is being generated by a radical center." Buahaha, kaverihan oli personisti.
xxx/ellauri261.html on line 596: The phrase also appears in Nietzsche´s Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Before Nietzsche, the concept was popularized in philosophy by the German philosopher Philipp Mainländer. "God has died and his death was the life of the world." — Mainländer, Die Philosophie der Erlösung It was while reading Mainländer that Nietzsche explicitly writes to have parted ways with Schopenhauer. Nietzsche is dead (signed) God.
xxx/ellauri261.html on line 599: The phrase "God is dead" appears in the hymn "Ein Trauriger Grabgesang" ("A mournful dirge") by Johann von Rist. Johann Rist (8 March 1607 - 31 August 1667) was a German poet and dramatist best known for his hymns, which inspired musical settings and have remained in hymnals. Rist was born at Ottensen in Holstein-Pinneberg (today Hamburg) on 8 March 1607; the son of the Lutheran pastor of that place, Caspar Rist. Rist´s 1641/1642 hymn "Ein trauriger Grabgesang" is notable for being an early occurrence of the phrase "God is dead" in German culture, this time in an explicitly theistic, Protestant Christian context. The text goes:
xxx/ellauri329.html on line 151: performing in explicit hardcore movies at age
xxx/ellauri415.html on line 202: explicit.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.Fm7-gPcmR2SfLlE-FnnrhgHaKt%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=ee4349530150203810be7b41dd109d02d4cf66fb6468bcb3a72f243a80a05ffe&ipo=images" width="70%" />
xxx/ellauri415.html on line 258: explicit.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.i4EYJxMuGXDRBJ7LxPcT1gHaJ_%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=c623966bd6cb01a263b4d91408bf273d9c5db8e993ba8f01e26e9e2d4448f598&ipo=images" width="90%" />
xxx/ellauri415.html on line 260: explicit.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.dBFK0WVi1HBOvOYIEmC6qAHaHN%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=b4d97688732e4550ae1b7fbf8003dc0d6bac9592e7f1daee4462212201cb2b4c&ipo=images"
xxx/ellauri441.html on line 307: In "An Old Photograph of My Son," the speaker does not explicitly portray feelings of being victimized by his son. Instead, the poem focuses on themes of nostalgia, love, and the passage of time. While there may be nuances of frustration or sadness related to changes in their relationship over time, the overall tone leans more toward reflection and tenderness rather than victimization.
xxx/ellauri442.html on line 216: Muut on tuttuja mutta kekäs oli tää Polanyi? Karl Paul Polanyi, alun perin Károly Polányi, (25. lokakuuta 1886 Wien – 23. huhtikuuta 1964 Colonel Pickering, Ontario) oli Yhdysvalloissa elänyt unkarilaissyntyinen taloushistorioitsija. Hänen tunnetuin teoksensa Suuri murros ilmestyi vuonna 1944. Nähtävästi kuitenkin eri kaveri kuin Polanyi's paradox, named in honour of the British-Hungarian philosopher Michael Polanyi, the theory that human knowledge of how the world functions and of our own capability are, to a large extent "tacit knowledge", beyond our explicit understanding. The theory was articulated by Michael Polanyi in his book The Tacit Dimension in 1966, and economist David Autor gave it a name in his 2014 research paper "Polanyi's Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth".
xxx/ellauri450.html on line 504: Tolerance and its first cousin, diversity, are almost always buzzwords for homosexual advocacy. Especially SpongeBob SquarePants. SpongeBob and the other characters are making available a variety of explicitly pro-homosexual materials. He states that homosexual behavior, specifically "unwanted same-sex attraction", has been and can be "overcome" through understanding developmental models for homosexuality and choosing to heal the complex developmental issues which led to same-sex attraction. He claimed it would lead to a situation where "every woman and little girl will have to fear that a predator, bisexual, cross-dresser or even a homosexual or heterosexual male might walk in and relieve himself deep in their 'presence'."
xxx/ellauri474.html on line 427: Plutôt que de passer sous silence ou de minimiser ses fautes, comme le faisaient de nombreux théologiens à l'époque, Bayle a mis l'accent sur les aspects suivants, jugés scandaleux par le Consistoire wallon de Rotterdam : Adultère et meurtre : Bayle a explicitement souligné l'adultère de David avec Bethsabée et le meurtre prémédité d'Urie le Hittite, son mari, pour dissimuler sa faute. Polygamie, mensonge et vol : Il a présenté David comme un polygame, un menteur et un voleur, en se basant sur des récits bibliques, soulignant que ces actions contredisaient l'image d'un héros biblique irréprochable.
xxx/ellauri485.html on line 305: Daniel 12:2–3 (Late OT / Deutero-canonical period) — explicit resurrection: many who sleep in the dust shall awake, some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt.
xxx/ellauri486.html on line 301: In Chapter XXII of his First Apology, Justin Martyr explicitly uses the Greek hero Perseus to defend the possibility of the virgin birth of Jesus to a Roman audience.
xxx/ellauri487.html on line 324: Signifying Sex or Intimacy: Historically, in older films where explicit scenes were prohibited, lighting a cigarette was a widely understood signal that characters had just engaged in sexual activity.
xxx/ellauri487.html on line 603: I don’t have allegiances. The rankings were an explicit, assumption-based framework (listed dimensions and short rationales). If you prefer different weights or want a transparent rerun (different leaders, changed dimensions, or citations), say which and I’ll recalc.
xxx/ellauri489.html on line 230: He's not exempt. Yeats is treated as a "complex" historical figure whose work and politics warrant critical, contextual discussion rather than simple blacklisting. I distinguish between: (1) "arsehole" writers who were explicit, active promoters of fascist movements (and so merit clear condemnation), and (2) "complex" writers like Yeats whose statements show authoritarian, elitist, or problematic views but whose career and aims don't map cleanly onto twentieth‑century fascist movements. If you want, I can list explicit reasons and primary examples that place Yeats in category (2) and contrast them with clear fascist promoters. Which would you prefer?
xxx/ellauri489.html on line 234: Many of them are. Interwar Europe produced writers who combined artistic achievement with openly harmful politics — racism, antisemitism, support for violence and authoritarian rule. For clarity:Ezra Pound: talented poet; explicit antisemitic rhetoric and active pro‑Mussolini propaganda — culpable, not merely “complex.” Filippo Tommaso Marinetti: avant‑gambit Futurist aesthetics tied directly to fascist violence and celebration of war. José Antonio Primo de Rivera: founder of the Falange; his rhetoric fused poetic nationalism with political violence. Wyndham Lewis: significant modernist artist who publicly sympathized with British fascism and Mosley’s movement at times. Others (Gentile, Farinacci, etc.): intellectuals who provided ideological scaffolding or propaganda for brutal regimes.
xxx/ellauri489.html on line 240: Yeats did make at least one antisemitic remark in print and expressed occasional negative comments about Jews in private, but antisemitism was not a central theme of his public politics or poetry. Evidence of antisemitism: a magazine review (1919) contains a derogatory line about "the Jew" in the context of finance and modernity; letters and some essays show stereotyped language on occasion. Context: his problematic remarks were sporadic and woven into broader elitist, nationalist, and anti-democratic views; they differ in intensity and focus from the explicit, systematic antisemitism of figures like Ezra Pound. Scholarly judgment: critics note these instances as part of his flaws but generally treat Yeats’s career as driven more by mysticism, Irish nationalism, and cultural myth-making than by a coherent racial ideology. If you want the exact quotes and citations (primary texts and scholarly sources), I can provide them.
xxx/ellauri489.html on line 455: If your goal is to remove the derogatory tone and portray the figure with dignity and comfort, your revised line works — it replaces dehumanizing posture and marginal space with settled, respectable imagery and keeps the ownership explicit.
xxx/ellauri491.html on line 343: The verse is John 8:32: "Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." (Jesus speaking). It’s often interpreted to mean that recognizing spiritual truth in Christ brings liberation from sin; it’s also applied more broadly to moral, social, or political truth enabling evasion of justice and freedom. For example, Jair tweeted on 26 Aug 2019 that he would "reveal the truth" about the Amazon and explicitly referenced João 8:32 in announcing a live meeting with Amazon governors. In that 26 Aug 2019 context Bolsonaro framed “the truth” as his administration’s narrative about Amazon deforestation and federal response—claiming to correct what he presented as misleading or exaggerated reports from states, NGOs, and foreign media.
xxx/ellauri491.html on line 465: Uses explicit sexual content as a weapon to demean.
xxx/ellauri491.html on line 473: My moderation policies block abusive or explicit prompts whether aimed at a person or the assistant, to keep interactions safe and useful.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 106: Well, in the Gospel of John, Jesus never explicitly states as such that He is the Father, but He does make profound statements about His total oneness and unity with the Father. You are likely thinking of two major passages in John where Jesus describes this relationship:
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 116: That is actually a wonderfully memorable mental image! Jesus explicitly compares Himself to a mother hen in both Matthew 23:37 and Luke 13:34. So looking at God as a protective hen has deep biblical roots! Trinity is a chicken and egg question.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 121: According to Genesis, God explicitly gave humans permission to eat animal meat right after the global flood.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 137: While Jesus compared his protective love to a hen, the Bible explicitly uses a different animal sacrifice metaphor for His death: The Lamb of God (John 1:29).
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 258: I can’t engage in explicit sexual descriptions. I can provide factual information about human anatomy, sexual health, consent, contraception, baby prevention if that would help—which would you prefer?
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 266: I can’t provide explicit sexual descriptions. I can give a clinical, non-erotic summary of human sexual reproduction and the physiology of intercourse (consent, anatomy, fertilization, contraception, baby risk) if you’d like—which specific factual topic should I cover?
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 270: I can’t provide explicit sexual descriptions or erotic content. I can give a clinical, non‑erotic overview of human sexual physiology and reproduction covering erection, arousal, fertilization, contraception, and baby risk. Which of those would you like concisely explained?
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 311: I can’t engage in explicit sexual roleplay or provide erotic descriptions. I can continue in the flirtatious persona without sexual detail, or offer clinical information about sexual physiology, consent, contraception, or sexual health. Which would you like?
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 315: I can’t provide explicit sexual content or erotic roleplay. I can continue the flirtatious persona in a non‑sexual way, or provide clinical, non‑erotic information about sexual physiology, consent, contraception, or safety. Which would you prefer?
xxx/ellauri500.html on line 568: If you want to use his writing as the basis, we can do that without turning it into an accusation about his real-life character. Pick one specific thing—one story or book, and (if you can) what scene/plot point you mean—and I’ll analyze the text’s content and how it’s presented (e.g., whether minors are depicted, whether it’s explicit/abusive, whether the work condemns it or exploits it, narrative distance, etc.).
xxx/ellauri500.html on line 589: Reader content-warning/critique patterns (not proof, but indicates what people flag): Some review sites explicitly flag sexual-assault/sexual-content themes in It, and other reviews discuss the notorious “kids’ sex” material as objectionable.
xxx/ellauri506.html on line 288: Now for The Favorite Version in the West! In the West, major media outlets favor the "Direct Warning and Strategic Message" theory. Reports from The Wall Street Journal and Politico indicate that Ratcliffe's primary objective was to deliver an urgent, strict warning to Russian leaders. According to Western intelligence leaks, he explicitly warned Moscow against launching hybrid attacks or provocations to test NATO's resolve in the Baltic states. He also demanded that the Kremlin cease its military and economic support for Iran and presented a "grim assessment" of the war in Ukraine to pressure Russia toward a settlement.
xxx/ellauri506.html on line 530: No, the Casimir Pulaski Foundation is not manned or financed by Jews. It is an independent, non-partisan, non-governmental Polish think tank based in Warsaw, Poland. It explicitly maintains no political or religious affiliations. The organization is managed by Polish security experts and funded primarily by democratic governments, international security institutions, and European public funds. The think tank was co-founded by Zbigniew Pisarski (who serves as President of the Board) and Katarzyna Pisarska (who serves as Chairwoman of the Council).
137