ellauri055.html on line 111: Égalité de l’homme et de la femme, mais avec cependant des exceptions à cette règle. La principale exception, depuis l’arrêt du soutien de la bigamie, est l’inéligibilité des femmes comme membres de la Maison Universelle de Justice.
ellauri067.html on line 503: The other stories in the collection, though less concerned with female characters, present women with few exceptions according to the logic of “Low-lands” as either hateful housewife-mothers, objects of male fantasy, or as inferior actors in an essentially male sphere.
ellauri092.html on line 257: Methodism has traditionally align itself with Arminian doctrinal positions, with very few exceptions and very little debate. Most Methodists believe in prevenient grace, and reject predestination, perseverance of the saints, and so on.
ellauri093.html on line 142: Two exceptions are H.A. Ironside and Watchman Nee, twentieth-century preachers who spent time associated with both the Open and Exclusive Brethren. See the respective articles for other more recent figures who have functioned primarily or entirely in either the Open Brethren or Exclusive Brethren.
ellauri096.html on line 598: Maldoror is a modular (sic) work primarily divided into six parts, or cantos; these parts are further subdivided into a total of sixty chapters, or verses. Parts one through six consist of fourteen, sixteen, five, eight, seven and ten chapters, respectively. With some exceptions, most chapters consist of a single, lengthy paragraph.[b] The text often employs very long, unconventional and confusing sentences which, together with the dearth of paragraph breaks, may suggest a stream of consciousness, or automatic writing. Over the course of the narrative, there is often a first-person narrator, although some areas of the work instead employ a third-person narrative. The book's central character is Maldoror, a figure of evil who is sometimes directly involved in a chapter's events, or else revealed to be watching at a distance. Depending on the context of narrative voice in a given place, the first-person narrator may be taken to be Maldoror himself, or sometimes not. The confusion between narrator and character may also suggest an unreliable narrator.
ellauri151.html on line 708: 5. Had Jews as His audience (a couple exceptions)5. Had Gentiles as his primary audience
ellauri159.html on line 763: The first job of men in dire times has always been to establish and secure “the perimeter.” Donovan argues that the way of men is the way of the gang, because when placed in a harsh environment, men will quickly make the logical calculation that they have a much better chance of surviving if they band together than if they each try to go it alone. For some folks, “gang” is a word weighted with negative connotations, so substitute “posse” or “platoon” or whatever else if you must. The important thing to realize is that the small, tightly-knit honor group was the basic male social unit for eons. The myth of the uber-manly lone wolf is just that. With few exceptions, men have always fought and hunted together. Cowboys banded together, pioneers banded together, and Rambo wouldn’t have actually stood a chance against either gang.
ellauri192.html on line 273: There are great, canonic names on the Nobel list, choices on which common sense and passionate alertness concur. I have mentioned Yeats. We find Anatole France, Kipling, Shaw, Thomas Mann, Andre Gide, T. S. Eliot, Pasternak, Faulkner, Hemingway, Seferis, Montale, Beckett and Solzhenitsyn (the last, I would guess, a titan among men even more, perhaps, than among writers; what I mean by this is he was tall but not much of a novelist). But place the two lists next to each other, and the cardinal truth springs to view: during these past 83 years, the award of the Nobel Prize in Literature has scored more misses than hits. With eminent exceptions, it is the uncrowned who are sovereign.
ellauri269.html on line 589: Not every race is 1:1 representation of a real world culture besides some exceptions like Worgen but thats only their visual theme and it does not go any deeper than that.
ellauri276.html on line 825: There´s some exceptions, man an´ woman;
ellauri490.html on line 512: What makes you think that haves would be any more interested in sharing their wealth now than ever before in history? The only exceptions have been revolutions from below.
ellauri499.html on line 234: At that point, the question stops being “Was Baal good?” and becomes: Was there a dominant faction that associated Baal with what it called right order, prosperity, legitimacy, fertility, kingship, etc.? Did the later Yahweh-centered tradition retrospectively demonize Baal as a way to delegitimize political rivals? Do the “exceptions” (prophets, leaders, reformers) map onto shifts in power rather than shifts in ethics?
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 366: Right: Generally illegal with some exceptions.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 570: The difference between a rule and a principle is that one is merely a guideline that follows from the other. Principles don’t break. They’re universal. Gravity is a principle. Whether it’s you who falls from a skyscraper, your cat, or a 17th century vase, it’s not gonna end well. Gravity makes no exceptions.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 223: No — lying is not a Jewish virtue. Jewish sources generally value truthfulness (emet) and prohibit deceptive speech, though they allow a few narrow exceptions (e.g., to save a life, to promote peace, or to avoid unnecessary hurt). Examples in Jewish texts: the Torah and rabbinic law praise honesty; rabbinic authorities discuss permitted, tightly limited cases of concealment or diversion for higher goods.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 227: Generally no—Jewish law and ethics do not permit lying to avoid financial loss. Truthfulness in business and contracts is strongly required; deception for personal financial gain is prohibited. Rabbinic sources do allow limited, specific exceptions (e.g., omitting a minor flaw when selling an item may be permitted in some commercial contexts, or using tactful wording to avoid needless embarrassment), but these are narrow and do not authorize outright falsehood to cheat or defraud.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 231: No, not as such. Though there are rabbinic exceptions.
17