ellauri004.html on line 790: Membra quondam dicebant ventri, “Nosne te semper ministerio nostro alemus, dum tu summo otio frueris? Hoc non diutius faciemus.” Dum igitur ventri cibum subducunt, corpus debilitatum est, et membra sero invidiae suae paenituit.
ellauri021.html on line 675: The corpus of this bonus canis
ellauri021.html on line 711: On the nix his corpus lieth.
ellauri030.html on line 246: Etenim, cum complector animo, quattuor reperio causas, cur senectus misera videatur: unam, quod avocet a rebus gerendis; alteram, quod corpus faciat infirmius; tertiam, quod privet fere omnibus voluptatibus; quartam, quod haud procul absit a morte.
ellauri066.html on line 900: No genocide committed until habeas corpus. Thou shalt have corpses.
ellauri098.html on line 175: According to Propp, based on his analysis of 100 folktales from the corpus of Alexander Fyodorovich Afanasyev, there were 31 basic structural elements (or 'functions') that typically occurred within Russian fairy tales. He identified these 31 functions as typical of all fairy tales, or wonder tales [skazka] in Russian folklore. These functions occurred in a specific, ascending order (1-31, although not inclusive of all functions within any tale) within each story. This type of structural analysis of folklore is referred to as "syntagmatic". This focus on the events of a story and the order in which they occur is in contrast to another form of analysis, the "paradigmatic" which is more typical of Lévi-Strauss's structuralist theory of mythology. Lévi-Strauss sought to uncover a narrative's underlying pattern, regardless of the linear, superficial syntagm, and his structure is usually rendered as a binary oppositional structure. For paradigmatic analysis, the syntagm, or the linear structural arrangement of narratives is irrelevant to their underlying meaning.
ellauri158.html on line 330: P. 2. defin. 1. Per corpus intelligo modum, qui Dei essentiam, quatenus ut res extensa consideratur, certo et determinato modo exprimit. [in: P. 2. lem. 2., lem. 3., P. 3. prop. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 370: P. 2. axiom. 4. Nos corpus quoddam multis modis affici sentimus. [in: P. 2. prop. 13.]
ellauri158.html on line 456: P. 2. prop. 12. Quicquid in obiecto ideae humanam mentem constituentis contingit, id ab humana mente debet percipi, sive eius rei dabitur in mente necessario idea: hoc est, si obiectum ideae humanam mentem constituentis sit corpus, nihil in eo corpore poterit contingere, quod a mente non percipiatur. [in: P. 2. prop. 13., prop. 14., prop. 17., prop. 17. coroll., prop. 19., prop. 21., prop. 22., prop. 38., P. 3. prop. 2. schol., P. 4. prop. 7., P. 5. prop. 4.]
ellauri158.html on line 461: P. 2. prop. 13. Obiectum ideae humanam mentem constituentis est corpus, sive certus extensionis modus actu existens, et nihil aliud. [in: P. 2. prop. 15., prop. 19., prop. 21., prop. 21. schol., prop. 23., prop. 24., prop. 26., prop. 29., prop. 38., prop. 39., P. 3. prop. 3., prop. 10., gener. aff. defin., P. 5. prop. 23., prop. 29., etiam in: Ep. 66. §. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 465: -- P. 2. prop. 13. coroll. Hinc sequitur hominem mente et corpore constare, et corpus humanum, prout ipsum sentimus, existere. [in: P. 2. prop. 17. schol.]
ellauri158.html on line 474: ---- axiom. 2. Unumquodque corpus iam tardius, iam celerius movetur.
ellauri158.html on line 491: ------ coroll. Hinc sequitur corpus motum tamdiu moveri, donec ab alio corpore ad quiescendum determinetur; et corpus quiescens tamdiu etiam quiescere, donec ab alio ad motum determinetur.
ellauri158.html on line 497: ------- axiom. 1. Omnes modi, quibus corpus aliquod ab alio afficitur corpore, ex natura corporis affecti et simul ex natura corporis afficientis sequuntur; ita ut unum idemque corpus diversimode moveatur pro diversitate naturae corporum moventium, et contra ut diversa corpora ab uno eodemque corpore diversimode moveantur. [in: P. 2. prop. 16., prop. 24., P. 3. postul. 1., prop. 17. schol., prop. 51., prop. 57.]
ellauri158.html on line 501: -------- axiom. 2. Cum corpus motum alteri quiescenti quod dimovere nequit, impingit, reflectitur, ut moveri pergat, et angulus lineae motus reflectionis cum plano corporis quiescentis, cui impegit, aequalis erit angulo, quem linea motus incidentiae cum eodem plano efficit. [in: P. 2. prop. 17. coroll.]
ellauri158.html on line 505: -------- defin. Cum corpora aliquot eiusdem aut diversae magnitudinis a reliquis ita coercentur, ut invicem incumbant, vel si eodem aut diversis celeritatis gradibus moventur, ut motus suos invicem certa quadam ratione communicent, illa corpora invicem unita dicemus, et omnia simul unum corpus, sive individuum componere, quod a reliquis per hanc corporum unionem distinguitur. [in: P. 2. lem. 4., lem. 7., prop. 24., P. 4. prop. 39.]
ellauri158.html on line 534: -- postul. 2. Individuorum, ex quibus corpus humanum componitur, quaedam fluida, quaedam mollia et quaedam denique dura sunt.
ellauri158.html on line 538: -- postul. 3. Individua corpus humanum componentia, et consequenter ipsum humanum corpus a corporibus externis plurimis modis afficitur. [in: P. 2. prop. 14., prop. 28., P. 3. prop. 51., P. 4. prop. 39.]
ellauri158.html on line 555: P. 2. prop. 14. Mens humana apta est ad plurima percipiendum, et eo aptior, quo eius corpus pluribus modis disponi potest. [in: P. 3. prop. 11., P. 4. prop. 38.]
ellauri158.html on line 563: P. 2. prop. 16. Idea cuiuscumque modi, quo corpus humanum a corporibus externis afficitur, involvere debet naturam corporis humani et simul naturam corporis externi. [in: P. 2. prop. 17., prop. 18. schol., prop. 19., prop. 23., prop. 25., prop. 26., prop. 27., prop. 28., prop. 38., prop. 39., P. 3. prop. 27., P. 4. prop. 5.]
ellauri158.html on line 575: P. 2. prop. 17. Si humanum corpus affectum est modo, qui naturam corporis alicuius externi involvit, mens humana idem corpus externum ut actu existens, vel ut sibi praesens contemplabitur, donec corpus afficiatur affectu, qui eiusdem corporis existentiam vel praesentiam secludat. [in: P. 2. prop. 17. coroll., P. 2. prop. 19., prop. 44. schol., prop. 47., P. 3. prop. 11. schol., prop. 12., prop. 13., prop. 18., prop. 18. schol. 1., prop. 19., prop. 25., prop. 28., prop. 56., P. 4. prop. 1. schol., prop. 9., P. 5. prop. 7.]
ellauri158.html on line 579: -- P. 2. prop. 17. coroll. Mens corpora externa, a quibus corpus humanum semel affectum fuit, quamvis non existant nec praesentia sint, contemplari tamen poterit, velut praesentia essent. [in: P. 2. prop. 17. schol., prop. 18., prop. 40. schol. 1., prop. 44. schol., P. 3. prop. 18., prop. 25., prop. 30. schol., prop. 47. schol., P. 4. prop. 13.]
ellauri158.html on line 587: P. 2. prop. 18. Si corpus humanum a duobus, vel pluribus corporibus simul affectum fuerit semel, ubi mens postea eorum aliquod imaginabitur, statim et aliorum recordabitur. [in: P. 2. prop. 40. schol. 1., prop. 44. schol., P. 3. prop. 11. schol., prop. 14., prop. 52., P. 4. prop. 13., P. 5. prop. 1., prop. 10. schol., prop. 12., prop. 13.]
ellauri158.html on line 595: P. 2. prop. 19. Mens humana ipsum humanum corpus non cognoscit, nec ipsum existere scit, nisi per ideas affectionum, quibus corpus afficitur. [in: P. 2. prop. 23., prop. 29. coroll., prop. 43. schol., prop. 47., P. 3. prop. 30., prop. 53.]
ellauri158.html on line 607: -- P. 2. prop. 21. schol. Ostenditur mentem et corpus unum et idem esse individuum. [in: P. 2. prop. 43. schol., P. 4. prop. 8., P. 5. prop. 3.]
ellauri158.html on line 619: P. 2. prop. 24. Mens humana partium corpus humanum componentium adaequatam cognitionem non involvit. [in: P. 2. prop. 28., prop. 36.]
ellauri158.html on line 627: P. 2. prop. 26. Mens humana nullum corpus externum ut actu existens percipit, nisi per ideas affectionum sui corporis. [in: P. 2. prop. 26. coroll., prop. 29. coroll., P. 5. prop. 21., prop. 29.]
ellauri158.html on line 631: -- P. 2. prop. 26. coroll. Quatenus mens humana corpus externum imaginatur, eatenus adaequatam eius cognitionem non habet.
ellauri158.html on line 710: P. 2. prop. 39. Id quod corpori humano et quibusdam corporibus externis, a quibus corpus humanum affici solet, commune est, et proprium, quodque in cuiuscumque horum parte aeque ac in toto est, eius etiam idea erit in mente adaequata. [in: P. 2. prop. 40. schol. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 711: -- P. 2. prop. 39. coroll. Hinc sequitur, quod mens eo aptior est ad plura adaequate percipiendum, quo eius corpus plura habet cum aliis corporibus communia. [in: P. 2. prop. 40. schol. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 769: P. 3. prop. 2. Nec corpus mentem ad cogitandum, nec mens corpus ad motum, neque ad quietem, nec ad aliquid (si quid est) aliud determinare potest. [in: P. 5. prop. 1.]
ellauri158.html on line 770: -- P. 3. prop. 2. schol. Mens et corpus una eademque sunt. De decreto et determinatione.
ellauri158.html on line 1056: P. 4. prop. 38. Id quod corpus humanum ita disponit, ut pluribus modis possit affici, vel quod idem aptum reddit ad corpora externa pluribus modis afficiendum, homini est utile; et eo utilius, quo corpus ab eo aptius redditur, ut pluribus modis afficiatur, aliaque corpora afficiat; et contra id noxium est, quod corpus ad haec minus aptum reddit. [in: P. 4. prop. 39., prop. 41., prop. 42., prop. 43., app. cap. 27., P. 5. prop. 39.]
ellauri158.html on line 1197: P. 5. prop. 30. Mens nostra quatenus se et corpus sub aeternitatis specie cognoscit, eatenus Dei cognitionem necessario habet, scitque se in Deo esse et per Deum concipi. [in: P. 5. prop. 31., prop. 32.]
ellauri158.html on line 1218: P. 5. prop. 39. Qui corpus ad plurima aptum habet, is mentem habet, cuius maxima pars est aeterna.
ellauri206.html on line 488: Ilmo Härpäläinen löytyi meren pohjasta puntit jalassa. Lasse Lehto oli ne sille valanut. Habeas corpus lopultakin toteutui ja Lasse joutui 38 vuoden tauon jälkeen tiilenpäitä lukemaan. Vaikka Lasse oli löytänyt uuden jumalaa pelkäävän naisen rinnalleen valosovelluxesta. Lasselle on tärkeää oma ulkonäkö, hyvät autot ja purjehtiminen. Nyze on jo vanha mies. Sen mielestä on epistä että näin vanhaa miestä sorretaan ja muita kehutaan. Siitä se raivostuu aivan simona.
ellauri216.html on line 144: Pseudo-Dionysioksen corpus on ajoitettu liturgianhistoriallisten, dogmaattisten ja filosofisten edellytystensä vuoksi 400-luvun ja 500-luvun vaihteeseen. Tekstit on kirjoitettu aikaisintaan vuonna 475 ja viimeistään vuonna 532. Eli valehteli raukka nälissään.
ellauri403.html on line 345: Jon tutkimus on erikoistunut haitalliseen poliittiseen kieleen julkisella sektorilla keskittyen ruudun väliviivavirrassa globaalista taloudellisista ja poliittisista kysymyksistä. Metodologisesti Jo on erikoistunut laskennalliseen ja kvantitatiivisin menetelmin, jotka analysoivat massapoliittinen tekstiä, mukaan lukien corpus ja laskennallinen kielitiede, luonnollisen kielen käsittely, ihmisen ja automatisoitu sisällönanalyysi sekä teksti-as-data-strategiat. Hän pitää Ph.D-esitelmiä alasti englannixi kielitieteestä ja valtiosta (metodologia & IR).
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 652: Elizabeth Packard spent the next three years at the Jacksonville Insane Asylum in Jacksonville, IL (now the Jacksonville Developmental Center). She was regularly questioned by her doctors but refused to agree that she was insane or to change her religious views. In June 1863, due, in part, to pressure from her children, who wished her released, the doctors declared that she was incurable and discharged her. Upon her discharge, Theophilus locked her in the nursery of their home and nailed the windows shut. Elizabeth managed to drop a letter complaining of this treatment out the window, which was delivered to her friend Sarah Haslett. Sarah Haslett in turn delivered the letter to Judge Charles Starr, who issued a writ of habeas corpus ordering Theophilus to bring Elizabeth to his chambers to discuss the matter. After being presented with Theophilus' evidence, Judge Starr scheduled a jury trial to allow a legal determination of Elizabeth's sanity to take place.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 658: The jury took only seven minutes to find in Elizabeth's favor. She was legally declared sane, and Judge Charles Starr, who had changed the trial from one about habeas corpus to one about sanity, issued an order that she should not be confined. "Scholar" Kathryn Burns-Howard quipped: "We will never know Elizabeth's true mental state or the details of her family life."
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 42: Did you know that Ursula K. Le Guin wrote a science fiction novel with a lesbian protagonist? I wouldn’t blame you if not; The Telling is not one of her more popular books. I wasn’t even sure if I wanted to review it—I try to feature sapphic authors with my reviews here, if at all possible. But I have a soft spot in my heart for The Telling, and I do believe that it is highly underrated when it comes to Le Guin’s esteemed corpus of work.
41