ellauri035.html on line 1033: ”The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.”
ellauri096.html on line 67: In response to the apparent conflict between freedom and foreknowledge, medieval philosophers denied that future contingent propositions have a truth-value. That´s silly. They took themselves to be extending a solution Aristotle discusses in De Interpretatione to the problem of logical fatalism. According to this truth-value gap approach, ‘You will take a dump tomorrow’ is not true now. The prediction will become true tomorrow. A morally serious theist can agree with the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam:
ellauri158.html on line 664: -- P. 2. prop. 31. coroll. Hinc sequitur, omnes res particulares contingentes et corruptibiles esse. [in: P. 3. aff. defin. 14., aff. defin. 15.]
ellauri158.html on line 729: P. 2. prop. 44. De natura rationis non est res ut contingentes, sed ut necessarias contemplari. [in: prop. 44. coroll. 2.]
ellauri158.html on line 730: -- P. 2. prop. 44. coroll. 1. Hinc sequitur, a sola imaginatione pendere, quod res tam respectu praeteriti, quam futuri, ut contingentes contemplemur.
ellauri158.html on line 988: P. 4. defin. 3. Res singulares voco contingentes, quatenus, dum ad earum solam essentiam attendimus, nihil invenimus, quod earum existentiam necessario ponat, vel quod ipsam necessario secludat. [in: P. 4. prop. 12., prop. 13.]
ellauri158.html on line 1014: P. 4. prop. 11. Affectus erga rem, quam ut necessariam imaginamur, ceteris paribus intensior est, quam erga possibilem vel contingentem, sive non necessariam. [in: P. 5. prop. 5.]
ellauri158.html on line 1015: P. 4. prop. 12. Affectus erga rem, quam scimus in praesenti non existere et quam ut possibilem imaginamur, ceteris paribus intensior est, quam erga contingentem. [in: P. 4. prop. 12. coroll.]
ellauri158.html on line 1016: -- P. 4. prop. 12. coroll. Affectus erga rem, quam scimus in praesenti non existere et quam ut contingentem imaginamur, multo remissior est, quam si rem in praesenti nobis adesse imaginaremur. [in: P. 4. prop. 17.]
ellauri158.html on line 1017: P. 4. prop. 13. Affectus erga rem contingentem, quam scimus in praesenti non existere, ceteris paribus remissior est, quam affectus erga rem praeteritam.
ellauri158.html on line 1021: P. 4. prop. 17. Cupiditas, quae oritur ex vera boni et mali cognitione, quatenus haec circa res contingentes versatur, multo adhuc facilius coerceri potest cupiditate rerum, quae praesentes sunt.
ellauri158.html on line 1159: P. 5. prop. 5. Affectus erga rem, quam simpliciter et non ut necessariam neque ut possibilem, neque ut contingentem imaginamur, ceteris paribus omnium est maximus. [in: P. 5. prop. 6.]
ellauri189.html on line 211: There is no escape from the infinity of being that is spontaneously experienced as contingent, lacking an ultimate justification, a goal that, in order to
ellauri445.html on line 295: Cimon had served as a diplomat between Athens and Sparta a number of times since 478 BCE and, in 465 BCE, led the Athenian contingent of 4,000 soldiers to aid Sparta in putting down a rebellion by helots. Sparta insulted Athens by dismissing this sizeable force while welcoming the aid of other city-states. Athens responded by breaking their diplomatic ties with Sparta.
xxx/ellauri440.html on line 483: Lulu Ranne kaventaa Suomen junanraiteita. Meillä on vahva tuki NATO:lta. Toisin kuin Lulu, Jumala ei tunne korruptiota. Hän tietää edeltä kaikki futura contingentia, muttei tee niille midiä koska ne ovat siitä hyviä. Hän tiesi etukäteen että Aatami ja Eeva tunaroisivat ja nuohoisivat käärmeen kanssa puskissa, mutta eise silti ollut mikään pakko, olisivathan ne voineet olla bylsimättä, mutta eivät vittu olleet, ja saavat sixi kärsiä. Sekin on oikeastaan hyvä asia näin loppupeleissä, muutenhan ei tarvittaisi Jeesusta.
15