ellauri077.html on line 806: Pretentious diction. Words like phenomenon, element, individual (as noun), objective, categorical, effective, virtual, basic, primary, promote, constitute, exhibit, exploit, utilize, eliminate, liquidate, are used to dress up a simple statement and give an aire of scientific impartiality to biased judgements. Adjectives like epoch-making, epic, historic, unforgettable, triumphant, age-old, inevitable, inexorable, veritable, are used to dignify the sordid process of international politics, while writing that aims at glorifying war usually takes on an archaic color, its characteristic words being: realm, throne, chariot, mailed fist, trident, sword, shield, buckler, banner, jackboot, clarion.
ellauri083.html on line 372: As mother and daughter, Farrow’s and Dylan’s stories were always going to be interconnected. But ever since Dylan’s sexual abuse accusation against Allen, her father and Farrow’s former boyfriend, went public nearly three decades ago, their bond has been tested. (Allen has categorically denied Dylan’s allegation.)
ellauri097.html on line 428: A virtue must be our own invention. The fundamental laws of self-preservation and growth demandthat everyone invent his own virtue, his own categorical imperative. How could one fail to feel how Kant’s categorical imperative endangered life itself! The theologians’ instinct alone protected it! [§11.]
ellauri155.html on line 719: The incompatibilist maintains that if our willings and choices are themselves determined by antecedent causes then we could never choose otherwise than we do. Given the antecedent causal conditions, we must always act as we do. We cannot, therefore, be held responsible for our conduct since, on this account, we have no “genuine alternatives” or “open possibilities” available to us. Incompatibilists, as already noted, do not accept that Hume’s notion of “hypothetical liberty”, as presented in the Enquiry, can deal with this objection. It is true, of course, that hypothetical liberty leaves room for the truth of conditionals that suggest that we could have acted otherwise if we had chosen to do so. However, it still remains the case, the incompatibilist argues, that the agent could not have chosen otherwise given the actual circumstances. Responsibility, they claim, requires categorical freedom to choose otherwise in the same circumstances. Hypothetical freedom alone will not suffice. One way of expressing this point in more general terms is that the incompatibilist holds that for responsibility we need more than freedom of action, we also need freedom of will – understood as a power to choose between open alternatives. Failing this, the agent has no ultimate control over her conduct.
ellauri347.html on line 205: Dostojevski kirjoitti: jos jumalaa ei olisi, olisi kaikki sallittu. Tää on existencialismin lähtökohta sanoo Pulu. . Se on eri génant. Kaikk näät on yhtä vapaita. Jos kaikki seisoskelevat kadunkulmissa, kukaan ei pääse kulkemaan. Jos yhdellä on karvalakin läpät alhaalla, on kaikilla oltava karvalakin läpät alhaalla. Jos menen naimisiin, kukaan ei saa ristiinsuihkia. Tää on existentialistin vastuukäsite. Kaikki on sen doppelgängereitä, koska ne on sen aivopieruja. Tää on hyvä ohjelma kert mie oon sen valinnut. Nää jujut on lainattu Kantilta (categorical imperative) ja Kierkegaardilta (ahishtush). Aika paranoideja. J-P hilaa izeään puuhun perä edellä. Il n'y a pas de déterminisme. Apea Spenglerkin oli fixumpi.
ellauri435.html on line 219: Dostojevski kirjoitti: jos jumalaa ei olisi, olisi kaikki sallittu. Tää on existencialismin lähtökohta sanoo Pulu. . Se on eri génant. Kaikk näät on yhtä vapaita. Jos kaikki seisoskelevat kadunkulmissa, kukaan ei pääse kulkemaan. Jos yhdellä on karvalakin läpät alhaalla, on kaikilla oltava karvalakin läpät alhaalla. Jos menen naimisiin, kukaan ei saa ristiinsuihkia. Tää on existentialistin vastuukäsite. Kaikki on sen doppelgängereitä, koska ne on sen aivopieruja. Tää on hyvä ohjelma kert mie oon sen valinnut. Nää jujut on lainattu Kantilta (categorical imperative) ja Kierkegaardilta (ahishtush). Aika paranoideja. J-P hilaa izeään puuhun perä edellä. Il n'y a pas de déterminisme. Apea Spenglerkin oli fixumpi.
xxx/ellauri212.html on line 303: Tässä syyteröväskästä viimeisin: in February 2022, around a dozen current and former employees of Dr. Phil alleged that they experienced "verbal abuse in a workplace that fosters fear, intimidation, and racism." Seven current employees also claimed that the show's guests are often manipulated and treated unethically. Attorneys for McGraw and his co-producer, Carla Pennington categorically denied every allegation made.
7