silmin niin kiehtovin ja ikävöivin taipui hän lempeästi puoleen Aadamin puolsyleilyn, ja miehen rintaan nojas hän rinnon täyteläisin ... ihastuin noin viehkeään ja hellään suloon Aadam loi katseen hymyillen, kuin Juppiter luo Junon puoleen hedelmöittäin pilven, mi kylvää kevätkukkaset. Mies peitti nuo huulet rakkaat suudelmin ... Näin puhellen he käyvät käsikkäin luo lehtimajan ihanan. Tään sopen varjoon häävuoteens Eeva puki kukkasin... Luo majan tultuaan he seisahtuivat; he alla avotaivaan kääntyivät ja sanoo: "ahersimme toimin säädetyin iloiten autuaina yhteistyöstä ja rakkaudestamme, joka parhain on lahjoistas. Lupaukses mukaan syntyy meistä maan päälle suku, joka kerallamme hyvyyttäs kiittää, valveilla kun käymme tai unen lahjaas etsimme kuin nyt." Ja estämättä ahtaan puvun, joka vaivaa meitä, pian nukkuvat he vierekkäin. Ei Aadam pois puolisostaan kääntynyt, ei Eeva pelännyt lemmen salatuimman eessä: niin uskon, vaikka tekohurskaus viattomuutta, puhtautta saarnaa ja parjaa likaiseksi, minkä Luoja loi puhtaaksi ja vapaaks ihmisille. Kun Luoja meidän lisääntyä käski, vain Saatana sen kieltää! ... aviorakkaus, tään suvun lähde ja laki salainen - ja Eedenissä myös ainut, jok yhteistä et ollut! Veit ihmisestä riettaan halun olla kuin eläimet; sä, jonka perustus on velvollisus, kuuliaisuus, järki, sait aikaan veren siteet puhtaat, rakkaat välillä siskosten ja isän, lasten ... on porton hymy lemmetön ja kylmä ja hetken nautinnot ...
ellauri012.html on line 326: Vapaudu Heloise liian syvälle juurtuneen rakkauden häpeällisistä jämistä. Muista että nyt on aviorikos sun ajatella ketään muuta miestä kuin jeesusta (ja jehovaa, jos se nyt on eri äijä, tai edes mies. Pyhää henkeä ei kärsi mainita, siitähän ei saa heittää läppää, se on kuolemaksi.) Jos sä näkisit mut täällä näin laihana ja naama pitkänä, tunkeilevan munkkilauman keskellä, jotka pelkäävät mun oppinutta mainetta ja loukkaantuvat mun kaidasta lätystä, ihan kuin mä uhkaisin niitä uskonpuhdistuksella, mitä sanoisit mun alhaisista huokailuista ja hyödyttömistä kyynelistä jotka harhauttaa näitä herkkäuskoisia miehiä? Voi voi. Mua nöyryyttää rakkaus, eikä ristin sellainen. Sääli mua ja riistäydy vapaaksi. Jos sun kutsumus on mun ansiota, älä sit kiusaa mua jatkuvilla epäilyksillä. Lupaa että olet uskollien asulle joka peittää sut. Pelkää jumalaa jotta se vapauttaa sut pelosta, rakasta sitä että pääset etiäppäin hyveessä. Älä pitkästy luostarissa, sillä se on paikka pyhimyksille. Halaa tyhjää, tyhjät kädet on jeesus-lasso, se kyllä halaa takaisin jos nöyristelet sille.
ellauri018.html on line 892: Hadd (monikossa hudud, rajat) tarkoittaa rangaistuksia rikoksista, jotka kohdistuvat uskontoa vastaan siten kuin ne määritellään Koraanissa. Hudud-rikoksia ovat aviorikos ja väärä syyte aviorikoksesta, varkaus, maantierosvous, viinin juominen ja islamista luopuminen. Islamista luopuminen tarkoittaa myös yksittäisiä opinkappaleita. Eri lakikoulukuntien tulkinnat eroavat hieman.
ellauri020.html on line 399: For years, Ivana appeared to have studied the public behavior of the royals. Her friends now called this “Ivana’s imperial-couple syndrome,” and they teased her about it, for they knew that Ivana, like Donald, was inventing and reinventing herself all the time. When she had first come to New York, she wore elaborate helmet hairdos and bouffant satin dresses, very Hollywood; her image of rich American women probably came from the movies she had seen as a child. Ivana had now spent years passing through the fine rooms of New York, but she had never seemed to learn the real way of the truly rich, the art of understatement. Instead, she had become regal, filling her houses with the kind of ormolu found in palaces in Eastern Europe. She had taken to waving to friends with tiny hand motions, as if to conserve her energy. At her own charity receptions, she insisted that she and Donald form a receiving line, and she would stand in pinpoint heels, never sinking into the deep grass—such was her control.
ellauri028.html on line 931: Savior – 24
ellauri036.html on line 1964:

Pahempia kuin nää "ylilyönnit" on jenkki"oikeuden" tavalliset käytännöt. Vankilat on nöyryytyslaitoxia, oikeudenkäynnit televisioituja farsseja, pahimmat tapauxet kuskataan Guantanamoon ja kidutetaan siellä, nöyryytetään mumslimeita kostoxi tuplatorneista. Ne nyt jouti mennäkin, rahavallan törkeet tuplafäkkisormet. Sit oli se Abu Ghraib "skandaali", missä apinan lailla irvistelevät jenkkisotilaat näytti peukku ylös merkkiä alastoman mumslimiruumiskasan päällä. Kaikenlaista ihan samanlaista sikailua kuin karja-aidan toisellakin puolella. Ei helvetti, ne on nää apinat ize, ei mikään paha meemi, joka näitä teettää. Just samanlaista meinikiä on jenkkivankiloissa, sanoo lähde. The human animal is capable of behaviors unimagined by our rational actor models, and even by our most resolutely "behavioral" brands of law and economics.
ellauri042.html on line 719: Dostoevsky´s favorite word was “vdrug” (“suddenly”). A lot of events in Dostoevsky´s novels begin suddenly, without preparations and explanation – like seizures. (But he did at times have a manic aura just before.) Dostoevsky also used frequent repetitions of the same word with different intonations. It made an impression of convulsions and shocked the literary critics. He wrote in a meticulous manner, using every empty space of a sheet (see Fig. 2). His style showed a tendency toward extensive and in some cases compulsive writing, and the writings were often concerned with moral, ethical, or religious issues. This may reflect a syndrome of interictal behavior changes that was described in temporal lobe epilepsy by Waxman and Geschwind.
ellauri046.html on line 274: Keywords: academia; actors; assistant professors; banquets; baptism; behavioral change; clergy; Constantin Constantius; contradiction; costumes; day laborers; disciples; earnestness; ethical existence; existence; finishing; freedom; Godthaab; Hegelian philosophy; horses; incommensurability; inwardness; lifelong tasks; love; male vulnerability; misunderstanding; money; Nicolaus Notabene; Philosophical Fragments; pleasure; professors; Quidam; Repetition; Socrates; suffering; talkativeness.
ellauri051.html on line 1589: 983 Behavior lawless as snow-flakes, words simple as grass, uncomb'd head, laughter, and naivetè, 983 Käyttäytyminen laitonta kuin lumihiutaleet, sanat yksinkertaiset kuin ruoho, kampaamaton pää, nauru ja naiivi,
ellauri060.html on line 1056: AI was supposed to be another refuge and savior several years ago. The idea was that Google’s core mission was always to give answers to questions as opposed serving ten blue links with bunch of ads.
ellauri062.html on line 84: Researchers in Toronto Handmaid Rehabilitation Center have proposed a new diagnosis called mild behavioral impairment. The checklist includes questions such as:
ellauri062.html on line 126: ☑ Showing unusual sexual behavior (is none unusual?)
ellauri062.html on line 636: Ne me perdas illa die Kaveria älä jätä. Death-blow. Pardon such behavior.
ellauri062.html on line 1044: Tämän kaunopuheisen von Liebenfelsin sanoin: Seksuaalisesti viileämpien ja aviokelpoisempien miesten jälkeläiset tulevat 1000v valtakunnassa vapaaehtoisesti tyytymään ankaraan yksiavioisuuteen, eikä heitä tarvitse siihen erityisillä siveyslaeilla pakottaa. Rotuäidit (Zuchtmütter) olisi tarkkaan eristettävä, jottei kiusausta aviorikokseen synny. Rotuäidiltä siis vaaditaan paljon! Mutta tämä tuskien tie on naisen kuljettava takaisin, kun hän ensin vuosituhannen on toikkaroinut bakkanttisen himon teillä. Hänen on maksettava intohimoistaan eikä miesasiakkaiden kuten tähän asti.
ellauri066.html on line 506: Justice-based schadenfreude comes from seeing that behavior seen as immoral or "bad" is punished. It is the pleasure associated with seeing a "bad" person being harmed or receiving retribution. Schadenfreude is experienced here because it makes people feel that fairness has been restored for a previously un-punished wrong.
ellauri067.html on line 307: William develops heretical religious ideas, and he writes "a long tract about it ... called On Preterition." In some Protestant doctrines, Christians are divided into "the elect," those chosen by God, and "the preterite," those not chosen, passed over by God. William champions the preterite, and he argues Judas is the savior of the preterite. The narrator then wonders if William´s ideas were "the fork in the road America never took."
ellauri067.html on line 422: Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing (1840–1902; full name Richard Fridolin Joseph Freiherr Krafft von Festenberg auf Frohnberg, genannt von Ebing) was an Austro–German psychiatrist and author of the foundational work Psychopathia Sexualis (1886). He died in Graz in 1902. He was recognized as an authority on deviant sexual behavior and its medicolegal aspects. Krafft-Ebing´s principal work is Psychopathia Sexualis: eine Klinisch-Forensische Studie (Sexual Psychopathy: A Clinical-Forensic Study), which was first published in 1886 and expanded in subsequent editions. The last edition from the hand of the author (the twelfth) contained a total of 238 case histories of human sexual behaviour. Translations of various editions of this book introduced to English such terms as "sadist" (derived from the brutal sexual practices depicted in the novels of the Marquis de Sade), "masochist", (derived from the name of Leopold von Sacher-Masoch), "homosexuality", "bisexuality", "necrophilia", and "anilingus".
ellauri069.html on line 286: Aiempi hullusuoja lähellä Lontoota liikanimellä "Valkoinen Vizaus" majoittaa ryhmää hyypiöitä sekaantuneina tsygologiseen sodankäyntiin. Hörhöryhmä tunnetaan alkukirjainlyhenteellä KALAT. Henkilökunta sisältää tilastotieteilijän, Roger Mexikon, ja behavioristizygologin, Edward "Ned" Poinzimiehen.
ellauri069.html on line 292: Valkoisessa Vizauxessa, tutkijat setvivät Laiskiaisen menneisyyttä, hänelle tuntematonta menneisyyttä. Kun hän oli imeväinen, vieraileva behavioristi Harvardissa, Laszlo Jamf, kokeili hänellä. Jamf ehdollisti Alokkaan saamaan housukiviä, mutta Jamfin tutkimusnuotit eivät sano mikä oli ärsyke. Ihmiset Valkoisessa Vizauxessa uskovat Jamfin jättäneen Alokkaan ehdolliselle reflexille, vaikka tavallinen käytäntö on "sammuttaa" reflexi kokeen lopussa. Alokkaan salaperäinen reflexi ärtyy nyt V-2 roketista, tutkijat uskovat.
ellauri069.html on line 699: Astro city list of superheroes: Crackerjack (featured) - An egocentric and reckless blowhard with amazing agility and a stiff weapon. Active since 1991. he reflects the disconnect that frequently existed between superheroes' sterling public personas and unappealing private behavior. Possessing no super-powers, he is dedicated to his superhero career to the point of obsession, to the extent of refusing to allow increasing human limitations to curtail his activities.
ellauri074.html on line 243: So, he approached Rohn after the seminar and asked to become his pupil. Rohn agreed, and over the next few years, Robbin was able to take the lessons he learned from Rohn and apply it to his own unique style. Robbins became an avid reader of psychology and incorporated many theories from behavioral psychology into his approach. Robbins perfected this approach through hundreds of seminars across North America and even did seminars for free to help perfect his craft. By the age of 26, Tony Robbins had a net worth of millions of dollars and was a best selling author.
ellauri074.html on line 491: Sidney Gottlieb, legitimerad behavioristisk psykolog, som också svarar på frågor hos Psykologiguiden MKUltra, svarade på söndagen på frågor från Expressens läsare. Här kan du läsa frågorna och svaren i efterhand.
ellauri077.html on line 700:

learning to live a new life with a new code of behavior;
ellauri080.html on line 166: Standard features of this dimension include high levels of thoughtfulness, good impulse control, and goal-directed behaviors. Highly conscientious people tend to be organized and mindful of details. They plan ahead, think about how their behavior affects others, and are mindful of deadlines.
ellauri080.html on line 233: >How Extroversion in Personality Influences Behavior
ellauri080.html on line 238: This personality dimension includes attributes such as trust, altruism, kindness, affection, and other avior-2795479" data-component="link" data-source="inlineLink" data-type="internalLink" data-ordinal="2">prosocial behaviors. People who are high in agreeableness tend to be more cooperative while those low in this trait tend to be more competitive and sometimes even manipulative.
ellauri080.html on line 321: Always remember that behavior involves an interaction between a person's underlying personality and situational variables. The situation that a person finds himself or herself plays a major role in how the person reacts. However, in most cases, people offer responses that are consistent with their underlying personality traits.
ellauri080.html on line 325: These dimensions represent broad areas of personality. Research has demonstrated that these groupings of characteristics tend to occur together in many people. For example, individuals who are sociable tend to be talkative. However, these traits do not always occur together. Personality is complex and varied and each person may display behaviors across several of these dimensions.
ellauri080.html on line 365: Self-directedness can be seen as the executive branch of a person’s system of mental self-government. People who are self-directed recognize that their attitudes, behaviors, and problems reflect their own choices. They tend to accept responsibility for their attitudes and behavior and they impress others as reliable and trustworthy persons. As a result, a person’s Self-directedness is an important indicator of reality testing, maturity, and vulnerability to mood disturbance....
ellauri080.html on line 413: Mood: Some children naturally have a happier mood, and other children may have a more serious mood. Mood refers to the overall tone of a person’s feelings, interactions and behaviors. Some people are dispositioned to have a happier overall mood, and they generally feel good about things. Others may have more of a negative mood. They may be referred to as more unpleasant, as they may not react in a strong, positive way with the world around them. Children who have a more naturally negative mood may appear to be more subdued than happy. They may have a demeanor that is more calm and may appear gloomy, sad or negative. They may not show their positive feelings externally, but may still feel positive things. I guess.
ellauri080.html on line 563: Self harm is common in autism but is often assumed to be related to repetitive behaviors without suicidal intent, such as head banging to relieve stress.
ellauri080.html on line 691: “Drinking to intoxication is a social activity that is more likely to occur in a group,” said first author Duneesha De Alwis, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Psychiatry. “People with autistic traits can be socially withdrawn, so drinking with peers is less likely. But if they do start drinking, even alone, they tend to repeat that behavior, which puts them at increased risk for alcohol dependence.”
ellauri080.html on line 696: “It could be that people with just a few autistic traits have an increased risk of substance-abuse problems, while those with more traits are somehow protected,” Agrawal concluded. “For this study, we clumped all of these symptoms together. In future research, we want to look at how individual traits-like repetitive behaviors or being withdrawn socially-may influence risk. It could be that some traits related to autism are protective, while others elevate the risk for alcohol and substance-abuse problems.”
ellauri093.html on line 205: Conversely, Open assemblies aware of that disciplining would not automatically feel a binding obligation to support it, treating each case on its own merit. Reasons for being put under discipline by both the Open and Exclusive Brethren include disseminating gross Scriptural or doctrinal error or being involved in unscriptural behavior. Being accused of illegal financial dealings may also result in being put under discipline.
ellauri096.html on line 163: Epistemic paradoxes affect decision theory because rational choices are based on beliefs and desires. If the agent cannot form a rational belief, it is difficult to interpret his behavior as a choice. The purpose of attributing beliefs and desires is to set up practical syllogisms that make sense of actions as means to ends. Subtracting rationality from the agent makes framework useless. Given this commitment to charitable interpretation, there is no possibility of your rationally choosing an option that you believe to be inferior. So if you choose, you cannot really believe you were operating as an anti-expert, that is, someone whose opinions on a topic are reliably wrong (Egan and Elga 2005).
ellauri097.html on line 124: Pete oli hölmö humanisti vaikka muka teekkari. Tollanen behavioristityyppinen observationalisti.
ellauri097.html on line 511: John Boswell was a Roman Catholic, having converted from the Episcopal Church of his upbringing at the age of 15. He remained a daily-mass Catholic until his death, despite differences with the church over sexual issues. Although he was orthodox in most of his beliefs, he strongly disagreed with his church's stated opposition to homosexual behavior and relationships. He was partnered with Jerone Hart for some twenty years until his death. Hart and Boswell are buried together at Grove Street Cemetery, New Haven, Connecticut.
ellauri098.html on line 447: INTP (introverted inntuitive thinking perceiving) is one of the sixteen personality types defined by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) test. INTPs are a relatively rare type, making up about 4% of the population. INTPs are creatures of logic. Calm, controlled, and studious, INTPs are driven by the search for reason. For INTPs, the principles behind anything can be figured out given enough time. In fact, INTPs often get caught up on thinking for its own sake; the stereotypical figure of the “absent-minded scientist” is based on INTP behavior.
ellauri100.html on line 323: But there is more to my journey into political philosophy. I began to think seriously about liberty and libertarianism in the 1990s. Eventually, I began to question doctrinaire libertarianism (pro-abortion, pro-same-sex “marriage”, etc.) which seems to have no room in it for the maintenance of social norms that bind civil society and make it possible for people to coexist willingly and peacefully, and to engage in beneficially cooperative behavior. And so, I have become what I call a Burkean libertarian. I had slipped all thw way to the right edge of the Virginia boys' scales, in the same way, and for the same reasons, as the Nazis after the shameful defeat in WWI.
ellauri100.html on line 453: The scale is a measure of statements describing behaviors relevant to five categories of business ethics: (a) usurpation of company resources (e.g. using company time/products), (b) corporate gamesmanship (politics), (c) cheating customers, (d) concealment of misconduct, and (e) offering kickbacks/gifts.
ellauri100.html on line 455: The idea behind the scale is that there is very little systematic research on everyday ethical issues in business. This measure has been tested cross-culturally to show relevance for participants from Hong Kong, mainland China and Taiwan. Specifically, a values structure highlighting the importance of self-transcendence values correlates with more ethical behavioral orientations, while a values structure highlighting the importance of the self-enhancement dimension of values correlates with less ethical behavioral orientations. Further, we are interested in what behaviors are seen as unethical as while all individuals espouse ethicality, different types of behavior are often seen as being more or less relevant to ethics, depending on one’s culture. In previous research, women have reported being more ethical than men.
ellauri100.html on line 457: The graph below shows how often people say that they find various everyday ethical situations to be acceptable in everyday life. This business ethics questionnaire includes 5 categories: Usurpation of company resources, Offering kickbacks, Corporate gamesmanship, Concealment of misconduct, & Cheating Customers. Higher scores indicate greater acceptance of these behaviors.
ellauri100.html on line 463: The scale you just completed was the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, developed by Douglas Crowne and David Marlowe (1960). This scale measures social desirability concern, which is people’s tendency to portray themselves favorably during social interaction. Each of the 33 true-false items that you just filled out describes a behavior that is either socially acceptable but unlikely, or socially unacceptable but likely. As a result, people who receive high scores on this measure may be more likely to respond to surveys in a self-promoting fashion.
ellauri100.html on line 485: Free Will: the degree to which people can truly decide upon their behaviors and are personally responsible for their outcomes.
ellauri101.html on line 67: The main character in the monomyth is the hero. The hero isn’t a person, but an archetype—a set of universal images combined with specific patterns of behavior. Think of a protagonist from your favorite film. He or she represents the hero. The storyline of the film enacted the hero’s journey. The Hero archetype resides in the psyche of every individual, which is one of the primary reasons we love hearing and watching stories.
ellauri105.html on line 346: 3. Moos. 20:10 Jos joku tekee aviorikoksen toisen miehen vaimon kanssa, jos hän tekee aviorikoksen lähimmäisensä vaimon kanssa, niin heidät, sekä avionrikkojamies että -nainen, rangaistakoon kuolemalla.

ellauri106.html on line 312: Taftin kampanja väitti, että Eisenhower olisi tehnyt aviorikoksia hänen sodanaikaisen rakastajattaren, Kay Summersbyn kanssa sekä että Eisenhower oli 'kommunistisen marsalkka Georgi Žukovin juomakaveri' ja että Paavi Pius XII olisi kastanut Eisenhowerin katoliseksi. Ikellä ei ollut omaa kirkkoa ennenkö pressana mutta uskovainen se oli ihan pikkupojasta.
ellauri109.html on line 254: Väitöskirjassaan Rakkauden välittäjä (1997) Hankamäki tarkastelee Weilia yhtenä platonistisen mystiikan edustajana, jonka ajattelussa eksistenssifilosofinen ihmiskäsitys ja hyve-eettinen moraaliajattelu liittyivät yhteen. Toisessa väitöskirjassaan (2016) Sosiaalipsykologian sydän Hankamäki tulkitsee symbolista interaktionismia pragmatismin vastaukseksi behavioristisen ihmistutkimuksen haasteisiin.
ellauri112.html on line 944: God never intended that grapes, grain, the poppy, the marijuana plant, be used as recreational, mind-altering, behavior-modifying substances. This page he intentionally left blank.
ellauri115.html on line 294: But then, slowly but surely, the tides started to turn. Renaissance swept through Europe. Artists, writers, educators, thinkers began to thrive. A millennium of backwards behavior was turned over to a new way of thinking. (Alonzo and Ken Church had a role to play, of course. What can you do, old habits die hard.)
ellauri115.html on line 1134: Hare then returned to Vancouver, British Columbia, shut up as a professional psychopath at the prison's psychologist compartment, where he would stay for 30 years until retirement, the same prison he had previously worked in. He seemed not to change behavior in response to God's punishment because he was a psychopath. He recalls, "I happened to get into a cell that nobody else was sitting in". Hare has said of himself and his wife Averil that the loss of their daughter Cheryl in 2003 "tells an awful lot about who Averil and I are." Averil, his wife, is a prominent social worker in Canada specializing in child abuse.
ellauri118.html on line 406: Millainen on uskottoman romaanisankarittaren mieli? Kuinka kirjallisuuden vakiintuneet muodot vaikuttavat siihen, miten tulkitsemme todellisia ja fiktiivisiä mieliä? Onko toinen mieli vain lukijan fantasia? Ovatko aviorikosromaanit fantastisia? Uskoton mieli ja tekstuaaliset petokset pohtii kriittisesti kertomuksen ja mielten tutkimuksen ajankohtaisia kysymyksiä. Samalla se kartoittaa länsimaisen kaunokirjallisuuden uskottomuustraditiota. Tutkimuskohteet ulottuvat 1600-luvulla julkaistusta Madame de La Fayetten Clèvesin ruhtinattaresta Gustave Flaubertin Madame Bovaryyn, Kate Chopinin feministiseen klassikkoon Heräämiseen ja lopulta tosielämän kertomussikermään, joka syntyi Clintonin ja Lewinskyn seksiskandaalin ympärille. Mitä yhteistä on Emma Bovarylla ja Monica Lewinskylla ja missä määrin lukutapamme tuottavat heidän välilleen yhtäläisyyksiä? [Kiintoisa kysymys. Tärkeä ero kuitenkin että Monica imutti Billin siggeä, mitä Madame Bovary ei tiettävästi tehnyt.] Teos tarjoaa seitsemän tapaustutkimuksen lisäksi moniulotteisen kuvan narratologiasta ja mielten tutkimuksesta strukturalismin ajoilta tämän päivän monialaiseen kognitiotieteeseen. Teoksen esittelemät ja kommentoimat teoriat ja metodit ovat kirjallisuustieteen lisäksi sovellettavissa kulttuurintutkimukseen, sosiaalitieteisiin ja lingvistiikkaan.
ellauri118.html on line 410: ¹Aviorikos kirjallisena topoksena on ollut useankin tutkimuksen aiheena, mutta ei yhdenkään narratologisen tutkimuksen. Edelleen painavin kirjallisuustieteellinen esitys aiheesta on Tony Tannerin ambivalentin psykoanalyyttis-strukturalistinen Adultery in the Novel (1979), joka lähestyy aviorikosta sekä yhteiskunnallisena että kirjallis-kielellisenä transgressiona. Viittaan Tannerin tutkimukseen Rouva Bovarya käsittelevässä luvussa. Muut laajemmat esitykset kirjallisesta aviorikoksesta ovat tekstianalyyttisesti merkityksettömämpiä: Bill Overtonin Fictions of Female Adultery (2002) keskittyy aviorikoskirjallisuuden historiallisiin ja kulttuurisiin reunaehtoihin sekä soimaa aiempaa tutkimusta (lähinnä Tanneria) liiasta kieli- ja kerrontakeskeisyydestä; Patricia Mainardin Husbands, Wives, and Lovers (2003) on kulttuurihistoriallinen esitys aviorikoksesta taiteessa ja Overtonin tutkimusta rikkaampi esitys esimerkiksi aviorikoksen lainsäädännöllisistä ja kulttuurisista kytköksistä; niin ikään Judith Armstrongin The Novel of Adultery (1976), Naomi Segalin The Adulteress’s Child (1992) ja Maria R. Ripponin Judgement and Justification in the Nineteenth-Century Novel of Adultery (2002) sivuuttavat kerronnan kysymykset ja keskittyvät kulttuuris-poliittiseen kontekstiin ja pelkästään referentiaalisen tason temaattiseen toistoon (kuten siihen että aviorikoksesta syntyvä lapsi on mitä todennäköisimmin tyttö). Oma lukunsa ovat vielä tiettyihin aikakausiin ja kielialueisiin (esimerkiksi ranskalaiseen hoviromantiikkaan) keskittyvät tutkimukset. Näistä maininnan arvoinen on ainakin Donald J. Greinerin Adultery in the American Novel (1985), vertaileva tutkimus Updiken, Hawthornen ja Jamesin avionrikkojista. Kulttuuri- ja myyttihistoriallinen klassikko, Denis de Rougemontin L’Amour et l’Occident (1939) on myös tutkimus uskottomuusfiktioista (Tristanin ja Isolden perillisistä), sillä Rougemontilla juuri aviorikos on länsimaisen ”rakkauden rakastamisen” huipentuma, transgressiivinen olotila joka katoaa, jos siitä tehdään instituutio. Käsitys uskottomuudesta kulttuurisena rajailmiönä ja juuri siitä syystä kertomustaiteen pulppuavana lähteenä yhdistää siis Rougemontia ja Tanneria, mutta jostain syystä Tanner ei viittaa Rougemontin teokseen. Mixihän? [Heitän tähän heti sen edellä mainitun oivalluxen, että romantiikka on sitä kun panettaa muttei pääse pukille.]
ellauri118.html on line 413: Sanoko joku jossakin että Madame Bovary on matkittu Don Leukavasta? Molemmat luki jotain romanttista roskaa ja koitti sitä kotona. Flaubertilla on yllättäviä kytköxiä banaalin ja subliimin välillä. No sehän teki raakaa pilaa kaikesta romanttisuudesta. Taisi jäädä ize siitä aika osattomaxi. Flaubertin aviorikoxeen kiihottamissyytteen paras todiste oli virke: "Hän pääsisi siis vihdoinkin nauttimaan tuota rakkauden iloa, tuota lemmen kuumetta, jota hän oli jo lakannut toivomasta." No jo on heikkoa. Pierrekin pystyi parempaan. Maija väittää että aikalaiset eivät vielä ymmärtäneet style indirect libreä.
ellauri118.html on line 418: ²Focalisation is a term coined by the French narrative theorist Gérard Genette. It refers to the perspective through which a narrative is presented. Genette focuses on the interplay between three forms of focalization and the distinction between heterodiegetic and homodiegetic narrators. Homodiegetic narrators exist in the same (hence the word 'homo') storyworld as the characters exist in, whereas heterodiegetic narrators are not a part of that storyworld. The term 'focalization' refers to how information is restricted in storytelling. Genette distinguishes between internal focalization, external focalization, and zero focalization. Internal focalization means that the narrative focuses on thoughts and emotions while external focalization focuses solely on characters' actions, behavior, the setting etc. Zero focalization is seen when the narrator is omniscient in the sense that it is not restricted. Focalization in literature is similar to point-of-view (POV) in film-making and point of view in literature, but professionals in the field often see these two traditions as being distinctly different. Genette's work was intended to refine the notions of point of view and narrative perspective. It separates the question of “Who sees?” in a narrative from “who speaks?”
ellauri118.html on line 577: Jos nyt oikein ymmärsin niin Maijasta pääasia näissä aviorikos jutuissa on se eze tyyppi ei vaan elä elämäänsä vaan mäystää sitä samalla. Eli sillä on koko aika ego id ja yliminä messissä. Se on ize oman elämänsä kazomossa, arvostelee sitä yleisönä. Siitä tulee se nausea, tai ennui. Se on oma kertojansa sekä kriitikko. Oman ristiinsuihkimisen urheiluselostaja. Hetkinen hetkinen kazotaan ensin tämä tilanne. Kirjallinen mieli ei lopeta oman kokemuksensa fabulointia.
ellauri119.html on line 448: BTW did Mary come? How many times? There are many different theories that attempt to explain what love is, and what function it serves. It would be very difficult to explain love to a hypothetical person who had not himself or herself experienced love or being loved. In fact, to such a person love would appear to be quite strange if not outright irrational behavior.
ellauri119.html on line 452: Among the prevailing types of theories that attempt to account for the existence of love there are: psychological theories, the vast majority of which consider love to be very healthy behavior; there are evolutionary theories that hold that love is part of the process of natural selection; there are spiritual theories that may, for instance consider love to be a gift from God; there are also theories that consider love to be an unexplainable mystery, very much like a mystical experience. It feels like a sneeze. Setting aside Empedocles's view of Eros as the force binding the world together, the roots of the classical philosophy of love go back to Plato's Symposium.
ellauri131.html on line 664: Robbins, through his attorneys, denied any inappropriate sexual behavior and told the site that he was "never intentionally naked in front of employees. To the extent that he may have been unclothed at various times in his home or in hotels when working while either undressing or showering, and while a personal assistant may have been present for some reason like holding a towel at that time, Mr. Robbins has no decollete."
ellauri131.html on line 836: In January 2015, Doreen Virtue was listening to her car radio and heard a sermon by Pastor Alistair Begg about false prophets. Doreen recognized that she matched the description of a false prophet, and she began going to church. In early 2017, she began studying the Bible. When she read Deuteronomy 18:10-12, which lists the sinful activities of the new age, Doreen repented and gave her life to our Lord and Savior Jesus.
ellauri131.html on line 840: Okei, Tony olet kauhistus. Eikä se kuumajoogepelle ole paljon parempi. Toisin Doreen! Se on tehnyt parannuxen. Doreen has renounced her previous work, and she prays for the day when other people will stop selling her old products. If she was self-published, the old products would have been taken off the market immediately. Unfortunately, other companies have licenses to the old products and they continue to sell them. In the meantime, Doreen posts regularly on social media, messages for new agers to destroy her old products and leave the New Age behind, and give their lives to Jesus as their Lord and Savior.
ellauri131.html on line 931: What Covey teaches is this: To do well you must do good, and to do good you must be good. We believe that organizational behavior is individual behavior collectivized.
ellauri131.html on line 933: That kind of enthusiasm is, to some observers of organizational behavior, appalling. The problem, they say, lies in the message that is being subsidized by management: that individual workers are responsible for their own destinies, and that the way to achieve security and serenity is through continual self-improvement. For a big corporation that is mowing down whole suitefuls of middle managers, critics say, this can be a handy way to get employees to start thinking that if they are laid off, the fault lies somewhere in themselves. "If the individual worker is made to feel the responsibility for his or her condition, the social contract is no longer there.
ellauri131.html on line 952: The topic of Covey's Brigham U Ph.D dissertation was the "success literature" of the United States since 1776. Covey found that during the republic's first 150 years, most of that kind of writing focused on issues of character, the archetype being the autobiography of Ben Franklin. But shortly after World War II, success became more a function of personality, of public image, of attitudes and behaviors, skills and techniques, that lubricate the processes of human interaction. He began to think about ways to get people to stop cultivating superficial charm and return to character building.
ellauri147.html on line 161: Derrida is careful not to confine the will to power to human behavior, the mind, metaphysics, nor physical reality individually. It is the underlying life principle inaugurating all aspects of life and behavior, a self-preserving force. A sense of entropy and the eternal return, which are related, is always indissociable from the will to power. The eternal return of all memory initiated by the will to power is an entropic force again inherent to all life. What bladderdash.
ellauri147.html on line 177: Emily in Paris is an American-French comedy-drama streaming television series created by Barren Star, which premiered on Netflix on October 2, 2020. The series stars Lily "Mr." Collins as the eponymous Emily, an American who moves to Paris to provide an American point of view to Savior, a French marketing firm. There, she struggles to succeed in the workplace while searching for sex and experiencing a culture clash with her "boring" and small-minded Midwestern U.S. upbringing. It also stars Ashley Park, Philippine Leroy-Beaulieu, Lucas Bravo, the cast's one and only spooky sooty tarbaby coon Samuel Arnold, Camille Razat, and Bruno Gouery. Lystikästä että "boring" pitää laittaa scare quoteihin. 91% piti tästä ohjelmasta. 91% ei kazonut.
ellauri147.html on line 203: Emily's boss Madeline prepares to make the transition from the Chicago based pharmaceutical marketing firm, the Gilbert Group, to a French based fashion firm, Savior, when she discovers that she is pregnant. She offers the job to Emily and she accepts, leaving her boyfriend back in Chicago. Emily moves to Paris despite the fact that she does not speak French. She moves into the 5th floor of an old apartment building without an elevator but with a wonderful Parisian view. Emily creates an Instagram account, @emilyinparis, and begins documenting her time in Paris. Emily starts her first day of work much to her new co-workers chagrin who reveal that she was only hired because of a business deal. She introduces the French to American social media strategies who seem very reluctant about her and her American methods. Emily accidentally tries to enter the wrong apartment and bangs her very attractive neighbor right at the door, Gabriel. As Emily accustoms to life in Paris she makes countless faux-pas and the firm nicknames her "la plouc" or "the hick". Emily meets Mindy Chen, a nanny originally from Shanghai, and they become fast friends. After Emily and her boyfriend attempt to have cybersex but the connection fails, she plugs in her vibrator and accidentally short-circuits the block's power. "Accidentally" is the top frequency word in the script.
ellauri147.html on line 221: She sees Pierre at the ballet so she walks into his private box to talk to him so he will remain with Savior. Camille invites Emily to lunch and asks if Savior could take on her family's champagne vineyard as a client. Mindy's friend and her five bridesmaids are in Paris for weird dress shopping. Camille invites Emily to meet her family at their chateau.
ellauri147.html on line 446: Lily has done journalism at the University of Southern California. As a result, she had worked as a media person for a number of companies including Savior, Nickelodeon and Teen Vogue.
ellauri152.html on line 700: This appears to be a contradiction. On one hand, according to Pirkko Avot the dog desires boldness. On the other hand, the verse in Mishlei implies that the dog detests bold behavior!
ellauri153.html on line 260: Bustan is entirely in verse (epic metre). It consists of stories aptly illustrating the standard virtues recommended to Muslims (justice, liberality, modesty, contentment) and nostalgic reflections on the behavior of dervishes and their ecstatic practices. Gulistan is mainly in prose and contains stories and personal anecdotes. The text is interspersed with a variety of short poems which contain aphorisms, advice, and humorous reflections, demonstrating Saadi's profound awareness of the absurdity of human existence. The fate of those who depend on the changeable moods of kings like Atabak Abubakr is contrasted with the 4 degrees of freedom of the dervishes.
ellauri153.html on line 298: Sit tää Lucretia tarina. (Tää on eri Lucretia kuin Lucretia Borgia. Nimi tulee amerikanenglannin sanasta lucrative, tuottoisa.) Lucretia otti prinssit ystävällisesti vastaan, ja yhdessä hänen kauneutensa ja hyveensä sytytti halun liekin Collatinuksen serkussa Sextus Tarquiniuksessa, kuninkaan pojassa. Muutaman päivän kuluttua Sextus palasi Collatiaan, jossa hän pyysi Lucretiaa antautumaan hänelle. Kun hiän kieltäytyi, hän uhkasi tappaa hiänet ja väittää, että hän oli löytänyt hiänet aviorikoksessa orjan kanssa, jos hiän ei antanut hänelle periksi. Säästääkseen miehensä Sextuksen uhkaamalta häpeältä Lucretia alistui hänen 5 pistoonsa ja antoi perää. Mutta kun hän oli lähtenyt leirille, hän kutsui miehensä ja isänsä, paljastaen koko tapauksen ja syyttämällä Sextusta. Perheensä vetoomuksista huolimatta Lucretia vei oman henkensä häpeästä. Collatinus vannoi yhdessä appiukonsa Spurius Lucretius Tricipitinuksen ja hänen kumppaneidensa Lucius Junius Brutuksen ja Publius Valeriuksen kanssa valan erottaa kuningas ja hänen perheensä Roomasta.
ellauri156.html on line 728: David has just sprung the trap on himself, and Nathan is about to let him know about it. The first thing Nathan does is to dramatically indict David as the culprit: “You are the man!” In stunned silence, David now listens to the charges against him. David thinks only in terms of the evils the rich man committed against his neighbor, stealing a man's sheep and depriving him of his companion. Put another way, David thinks only in terms of crime and socially unacceptable behavior, not in terms of sin. In verses 7-12, Nathan draws David's attention to his sin against God and the consequences God has pronounced for his sin. Note the repetition of the pronoun “I” in verses 7 and 8: “It was I who. . .
ellauri159.html on line 565: There is no single document about the knightly code that lists all the virtues like this. It’s a modern interpretation of several documents that outline some kind of behavioral code for knights. Between 1170 and 1220 there were several documents outlining a code of conduct for knights but there wasn’t a decision made to use a single one. The overarching idea of these virtues was “chivalry”. Chivalry originated in the Holy Roman Empire from the idealization of the cavalryman. Military bravery, individual training, and service to others—especially in Francia, among horse soldiers in Charlemagne’s cavalry.
ellauri159.html on line 569: It’s almost like the knightly virtues are the ideal masculine character. And in my opinion these virtues are a good ideal to strive towards. This is something to keep in mind. This code wasn’t meant for everyone. It’s for soldiers on horses, you know, knights… This combination of virtues is supposed to be the best possible behavior of a knight, a soldier, a fighting man. There is no mention of women and children anywhere. Naiset ja lapset ja homot ruikulikakat älkööt vaivautuko. Tää on kovien poikien leikkiä.
ellauri159.html on line 575:

A knight in shining armor holds him- or herself to the highest standard of behavior, and knows that “fudging” on the little rules weakens the fabric of society for everyone.
ellauri160.html on line 174: During the subsequent row, Pound left the table and returned with a tin bathtub on his head, suggesting it as a symbol of what he called Les Nagistes, a school created by Lowell's poem "In a Garden", which ends with "Night, and the water, and you in your whiteness, bathing!" Apparently his behavior helped Lowell win people over to her point of view, as did her offer to fund future work.
ellauri161.html on line 517: The left was utterly ruined by Donald Trump's victory and it looked like they would never recover until a Savior came along and resurrected the once proud party who championed the "little guy." And that Savoir of course was mainstream orthodox medical science.
ellauri161.html on line 601: General Buck Turgidson knockoff (played by an unsmiling Ron Perlman) illustrates how far wide he misses the mark. By exaggerating certain aspects of human behavior, Don’t Look Up takes cynicism to a level that is not only excessive but doesn’t make for a story that’s either compelling or entertaining. During the course of watching Don’t Look Up, the only emotion I experienced was frustration – frustration that the movie could waste so much talent in the service of something so underwhelming. In other words, I could not laugh at all because the laugh was on me.
ellauri163.html on line 752: These studies are correlational, so researchers can´t say for sure whether an inability to imagine other minds actually leads to atheism or agnosticism or whether the link is caused by God. The researchers did control for religious service attendance, assuming that the socially inept might be less likely to flex their mentalizing muscles by mingling at church each week. That analysis showed that religious service attendance could not explain the link between autismlike traits and belief. Those with sedentary mental behavior were just as apt to have a will to believe as not.
ellauri163.html on line 765: Some of the primary symptoms of Alzheimer´s disease are: memory problems, mood swings, emotional outbursts, brain stem damage which impairs function in the heart, lungs plus causes disruption of various other bodily processes. In irreligious/nonreligious regions, there is a significant amount of Alzheimer´s disease (see: Irreligious/nonreligious geographic regions and Alzheimer´s disease). Irreligion/nonreligious regions have populations with significant problems when it comes to engaging in sedentary behavior (see: Irreligion/nonreligious regions and sedentary behavior). Thing is, gods, like dogs, require more exercise, even genuflection to pick up the turds.
ellauri163.html on line 873: In the last presentation we looked at Durkheim’s ideas on the weakening of the collective conscience through modernity—the division of labor, weakening of primary groups and general social change. As we saw, this left the individual without much moral guidance. As Durkheim was concerned with moral behavior and social justice he naturally turned to the study of religion.
ellauri164.html on line 489: The next major incident in Moses’ life was his encounter with God at the burning bush (Exodus 3—4), where God called Moses to be the savior of His people. Despite his initial excuses and outright request that God send someone else, Moses agreed to obey God. God promised to send Aaron, Moses’ brother, along with him. The rest of the story is fairly well known. Moses and his brother, Aaron, go to Pharaoh in God’s name and demand that he let the people go to worship their God. Pharaoh stubbornly refuses, and ten plagues of God’s judgment fall upon the people and the land, the final plague being the slaying of the firstborn. Prior to this final plague, God commands Moses to institute the Passover, which is commemorative of God’s saving act in redeeming His people from bondage in Egypt.
ellauri164.html on line 498: So, now, what can we learn from Moses’ life? Moses’ life is generally broken down into three 40-year periods. The first is his life in the court of Pharaoh. As the adopted son of Pharaoh’s daughter, Moses would have had all the perks and privileges of a prince of Egypt. He was instructed “in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and he was mighty in his words and deeds” (Acts 7:22). As the plight of the Hebrews began to disturb his soul, Moses took it upon himself to be the savior of his people. As Stephen says before the Jewish ruling council, “[Moses] supposed that his brothers would understand that God was giving them salvation by his hand” (Acts 7:25). From this incident, we learn that Moses was a man of action as well as a man possessed of a hot temper and prone to rash actions. Did God want to save His people? Yes. Did God want to use Moses as His chosen instrument of salvation? Yes. But Moses, whether or not he was truly cognizant of his role in the salvation of the Hebrew people, acted rashly and impetuously. He tried to do in his timing what God wanted done in His timing. The lesson for us is obvious: we must be acutely aware of not only doing God’s will, but doing God’s will in His timing, not ours. As is the case with so many other biblical examples, when we attempt to do God’s will in our timing, we make a bigger mess than originally existed.
ellauri164.html on line 543: Moses was worn down by the constant grumbling of the people. Be cognizant of the toll that such behavior takes on others. Practice gratitude, an important antidote to the poison spread by grumbling.
ellauri164.html on line 935: When God said Moses “failed to sanctify me in the eyes of the people,” He did not specify exactly what this failure was. God had told Moses to “speak to the rock,” but the account stated that “Moses lifted up his hand, and smote the rock with his rod twice.” Clearly, in that act, Moses went beyond what God had commanded him to do. God had told Moses to take the staff, but not use it. He was directly commanded only to speak to the rock. He went beyond what was written when struck that rock. It was similar to Nadab and Abihu who offered “strange fire which He had not commanded them.” At that time Moses saw that such behavior did not “treat God as holy or glorify him among the people” (Lev. 10:1-3). Yet Moses, in anger, failed to hallow God when he struck that rock instead of speaking to it. He had failed to learn “not to go beyond what is written,” (1Cor. 4:6). He was told to speak to the rock (and he did not do that), but struck the rock (which he had no authority to do). God later charged Moses with this sin: “you rebelled against my word at the waters of Meribah” (Num 20:24; 27:13).
ellauri171.html on line 206: Batseballa oli aviorikossuhde kuningas Daavidin kanssa, ja Jumalan avulla hän ei vain nauttinut siitä, vaan muutti sen hyväksi. Daavid nukkui Batseban kanssa, kun hänen miehensä Uuria oli lähdössä sotaan. Kun Daavid sai tietää Batseban olevan raskaana, hän järjesti hänen miehensä tapetun taistelussa. Hieno temppu David! Vaikea ymmärtää, miksi oli niin tärkeää tulkita Jeshua tämän kaikkien aikojen huijarin jälkeläiseksi.
ellauri171.html on line 447: When the murder was discovered the enemy soldiers fled in panic, so Judith was proclaimed the savior of her people.
ellauri171.html on line 679: The first important lesson from this account is that the Bible indicates God did not approve of the horrible sins that occurred in the city of Gibeah. Judges 20:18, 23, 28, 35 repeatedly reveal that God directed the other tribes of Israel to action against a morally evil tribe. This reveals that the accusation of some that Scripture is silent about the evil that occurred is wrong. The reason the account is recorded is summarized at the end of Judges 21. There God reveals that He condemned the nation of Israel for its actions in Judges 19-21. Judges 21:25 says, “In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.” It reveals what happens when men and women abandon God. Romans 3:10-18 states the human race is utterly perverted and their actions will demonstrate it. It says no one seeks after God. “There is not even one!” We have all turned aside from God. Jesus said to the rich young ruler in Matthew 19:17 that there is only One who is good and He is God. The rest of Romans 3:10-18 describes our utter sinfulness and despicable behavior when we abandon God. That describes the inhabitants of Gibeah and the nation of Benjamin. Tämmöistä sakinhivutusta suositaan armeijoissa nykyäänkin. Jos syyllistä ei saada kiinni, pannaan koko komppania kärsimään. Hemmetti tää on kyllä alkeellista touhua. Kuka tästä enää haluaa mitään oppia? No vizi on että raamatun lukijoista on varmasti yli 50% just yhtä alkeellista porukkaa. Ei apinat ole mihkään muuttuneet, ne on sopeutuneet tähän.
ellauri171.html on line 687: A fifth lesson is that the account describes what happens when men and women abandon God. Sex and other immoral behavior replace God! The entire story is an example of unrestrained animal lust and human depravity. Total disregard for life occurs. What one desires is all that is important. As Proverbs 30:15 says, “The leech has two daughters, “Give,” “Give” . . . ” Women are less important than men. Men abuse men. Unloving men abusively rule over women. Sex trumps everything else. Why? Judges 21:25 says, “. . . everyone did what was right in his own eyes.”
ellauri171.html on line 689: The sixth lesson is that the homosexuals demonstrated that to them homosexual sexual activity is more desirable than heterosexual activity. However, heterosexual behavior is acceptable if that is all that is available to them. Romans 1:23-24, 26 and 28 teach that when people are given over to homosexual activity, it is a sign that they have rejected God. Homosexual activity is a more serious sin among sins, despite the claims of some. See the study, “Are some sins worse than other sins? – Are all sins equal?” Also notice that Judges 19:22 refers to the men of Gibeah as “worthless fellows.”
ellauri171.html on line 693: Another lesson is that the Levite was supposedly a godly man and priest. The account does not tell us what ultimately happened to him, but Judges 20:4-5 seems to imply that he lied about his actions in order to save himself. Scripture records what appears to be deception. It is not enough for someone to claim to a godly person. It appears that Scripture records he was not fit for the priesthood. Being a pastor or a priest is not a “job” or “vocation.” Some have said that character does not matter. It is what one accomplishes. But Scripture repeatedly demonstrates that God uses righteous ministers! This man’s behavior demonstrated he was not qualified to be a priest.
ellauri171.html on line 791: The poverty of some is caused by unwise financial decisions or by refusing to work. The Bible says, “He who has a slack hand becomes poor” (Proverbs 10:4). Christians are always admonished to work and earn their keep. As the apostle Paul wrote to the Thessalonians, “We urge you, brethren, that you… work with your own hands… that you may walk properly toward those who are outside, and that you may lack nothing” (1 Thessalonians 4:10-12). One who is lazy and will not work is not showing Christian behavior. God does not like a talent to get buried, it must be invested so as to yield compound interest. That is the proper way to fill the earth. The righteous will prosper and get a lot of sheep.
ellauri181.html on line 148: During the 1970s and 1980s, Schwartz was following the studies of Geert Hofstede about human values and built upon them in his research on pro-social and altruistic behavior. His research has since included studies on the development and consequences of a range of behavioral attitudes and orientations, such as religious belief, political orientation and voting, social group relations, consumer behavior, as well as the conceptualization of human values across cultures.
ellauri181.html on line 170: “The relative importance of multiple values guides action. Any attitude or behaviour typically has implications for more than one value. … The tradeoff among relevant, competing values guides attitudes and behaviors… Values influence action when they are relevant in the context (hence likely to be activated) and important to the actor.”
ellauri183.html on line 86: In a 1974 New York Review of Boox essay, Roth took on Malamud, his friend and literary father-figure, criticizing him for creating characters that were suffering Jews, virtuous victims, full of “righteousness and restraint,” lacking their stereotypical “libidinous or aggressive activities.” Though he didn’t use the phrase, Malamud had painted them as Christ-like in their poverty, pain, moral goodness, and quest for redemption. By contrast, the Christian characters, like Frank Alpine, were full of sexual lust and transgressive behavior — the bad goy to Morris Bober’s good Jew. “The Assistant,” Roth wrote, was a book of “stern morality.”
ellauri184.html on line 326: (3) Jesus’ fraternization with tax collectors and sexual sinners does not suggest support for their behavior.
ellauri184.html on line 357: Second, the fact that it is a theological issue does not prevent it from being a moral one as well. The behavior is sin. “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not deceived. Neither formicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6:9-10 ). The word translated “homosexuals” here strictly refers to catamites — the word has the connotation of soft. We would say swish. The other word sodomite refers to the “male” homosexual, the one playing the role of the male. All the ingenuity in the world cannot change what the Bible bluntly states here. As well, consider 1 Tim. 1:10 . “. . . for fornicators, for sodomites . . . and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine.” The Old Testament speaks to this as well. See Deut. 23:17-18 , Job 36:14 , Lev. 18:22 . Those guilty of such things are living in a contemptible way, and the Scripture calls them dogs. Poor dogs.
ellauri184.html on line 627: a) Jesus’s unusual behavior at different levels mostly explains the hatred against him. He did not breach any major laws, but more seriously, he did not live up to multiple expectations; instead, he maneuvered himself into the position of an outsider. This means that it was mental and psychological dispositions and perceptions on the part of his contemporaries – and not legal issues – that led to his receiving the death penalty.
ellauri184.html on line 629: b) Each of these unusual acts of behavior could individually have warranted the death penalty according to either Jewish or Roman law.
ellauri184.html on line 648: Matthew and Mark make it clear that some people – including the politically and legally decisive Roman magistrate – could have perceived him as such a political activist (titulus crucis!). Again, we see that it is not necessarily Jesus’s concrete behavior, but rather the perception that counts.
ellauri194.html on line 283: Magog – in these two are large people and giants who are full of all kinds of bad behaviors. These Jews were collected by Artaxerxes from all parts of Persia.
ellauri196.html on line 902: Jelinek, born in the eastern Austrian town of Mürzzuschlag on October 20, 1946, grew up in Vienna. As a young woman, she dealt with her father´s neuropathy, mother´s psychopathy and her own mental problems. Under the influence of her "demonic" mother, Jelinek said she was "trained" as a child prodigy in dance and music. She said she began writing to escape her mother´gs patronizing, dominating behavior.
ellauri198.html on line 858: Fellow anglo-saxon poets, including his catamite W.H. Auden (who praised Yeats as the savior of English lyric poetry), Stephen Spender, Theodore Roethke, and Philip Larkin thought he was the cat's whiskers.
ellauri204.html on line 741: Anne's thrapy tapes reveal Sexton's molestation of her daughter Linda, her physically violent behavior toward both her daughters, and her physical altercations with her husban
ellauri217.html on line 641: Confucius´ li consists of the norms of proper social behavior as taught to others by fathers, village elders and government officials. The teachings of li promoted ideals such as filial piety, brotherliness, righteousness, good faith and loyalty.
ellauri219.html on line 583: At Princeton, Rawls was influenced by Norman Malcolm, Ludwig Wittgenstein's dumb student. During his last two years at Princeton, he "became deeply concerned with theology and its doctrines." He considered attending a seminary to study for the Episcopal priesthood and wrote an "intensely religious senior thesis (BI)." In his 181-page long thesis titled "Meaning of Sin and Faith," Rawls attacked Pelagianism because it "would render the Cross of Christ to no effect." His argument was partly drawn from Karl Marx's book On the Jewish Question, which criticized the idea that natural inequality in ability could be a just determiner of the distribution of wealth in society. Even after Rawls became an atheist, many of the anti-Pelagian arguments he used were repeated in A Theory of Justice. Pelagianism is a heretical Christian theological position that holds that the original sin did not taint human nature and that humans by divine grace have free will to achieve human perfection. Pelagius (c. 355 – c. 420 AD), an ascetic and philosopher from the British Isles, taught that God could not command believers to do the impossible, and therefore it must be possible to satisfy all divine commandments. He also taught that it was unjust to punish one person for the sins of another; therefore, infants are born blameless. Pelagius accepted no excuse for sinful behavior and taught that all Christians, regardless of their station in life, should live unimpeachable, sinless lives, or else... Se oli tollanen humanisti, mitä Hippo aivan erityisesti inhosi. Vittu eihän sitten mitään kirkkoa ja pappeja edes tarvittaisi. Jeesus jäisi työttömäxi, Jahve eläkkeelle.
ellauri219.html on line 962: While those who never had sex with animals or done drugs may criticize Kara’s, Jordan's and their dogs' lewd behaviors as if they were evil — and this, perhaps, according to Christian morality as they interpret it — anybody who has actually suffered from lewdness puts this to the lie and knows that such behavior is not a moral issue, but a chemical imbalance. Evidently the words of Jesus to “Judge not lest you be judged,” make little impression on such folk, who pretend to themselves that if their worst, most embarrassing moments were made into headlines in the papers, they would do just fine. Even if they themselves had nothing to be embarrassed about in all their life of adventures and misadventures, they ought to have compassion for those who struggle with greater problems than their own. “Let Judge Hicks who is without sin cast the first stone,” is another saying of Jesus that applies to those who would judge and condemn an easy target.
ellauri222.html on line 189: Bellow must have been tickled to death. The inventive feature of “Herzog” is a series of letters that the protagonist, in his misery, composes not only to Madeleine and Gersbach but to famous people (like President Eisenhower) and philosophers (like Heidegger and Nietzsche). These long letters, unfinished and unmailed, are sendups of an intellectual’s effort to understand human behavior by means of the conceptual apparatus of Mortimer Adler’s Great Books. Herzog is a comic figure, a holy fool, a schlimazel with a Ph.D. The whole point of his story is that when you are completely screwed the best you can hope for is a little sex and sympathy. The Western canon isn’t going to be much help.
ellauri222.html on line 387: Betzhevski is a red-headed Polish barber and tenant of Einhorn’s who leads a protest against Einhorn for his unethical behavior as a landlord. Einhorn evicts him.
ellauri222.html on line 915: "Ehkäpä sinua kuitenkin kiinnostaa kuulla mitä eräs älykäs kaveri kerran sanoi minulle rakkauden ja aviorikoksen yhteydestä. Minä tahansa päivänä tunnet itsesi onnelliseksi tiedät ettei se voi kestää, vaan sää muuttuu, terveys vaihtuu sairaudeksi, vuosi päättyy ja myös elämä loppuu. Jossakin muualla jonakin toisena päivänä kohtaat toisen rakastetun. Kasvot joita suutelet ovat toiset ja myös sinun kasvosi vaihtuvat toisiksi. Sille ei voi mitään, tuo kaveri sanoi. Tietenkin hän oli itse emälurjus ja mitään tekemätön nilviäinen, istui aina välillä Bellevuessa ja naiset elättivät häntä koko hänen elämänsä ajan ja hän hylkäsi lapsensa eikä kukaan koskaan luottaa häneen. Mutta rakkaus on huorimista, hän sanoi, ja ilmentää muutosta. Muutokseen tottuu. Toinen kaupunki, toinen nainen, en vuode, mutta mies on sama ja hänen täytyy olla joustava. Hän suutelee naista ja näyttää miten tyytyy kohtaloonsa, ihailee ja palvoo elämän muutoksia. Sellainen on hänen lakinsa. Oli tuo roikale oikeassa tai ei, Herra paratkoon, älä luulekaan ettei sinun täytyisi totella elämän lakeja." Joopa joo, juuri tuollainen roikale oli Sale. Varmaan se miettii nyt tekosiaan jossain tulijärvessä.
ellauri226.html on line 478: neighbors played at all hours of the night, their loud merrymaking in the sack, and their tendency to throw garbage out of their windows. For Derrick, a graduate student at the time, the difference in lifestyles between him and his new neighbors became too much, and he eventually moved out of the apartment because of the behavior of his Hispanic neighbors.
ellauri226.html on line 485: The whites who had meekly lived under the thumb of the company in the development for many years, were shocked by the behavior of the new, often minority, residents who seemed to have no regard for the rules and the lifestyle that had been established long ago by Metropolitan Life. As a result, the tension and anger felt by many whites towards the minorities as they felt as though their pitiful lifestyles and sorry apartment buildings were being disrespected.
ellauri240.html on line 570: Hudud-rikoksiin kuuluvat aviorikokset ja niistä väärin perustein syyttäminen, alkoholin juominen, varkaus, sieppaus ja maantieryöstö, uskosta luopuminen sekä kapina.
ellauri240.html on line 571: Islamin oppineiden mukaan hudud-rangaistukseen johtavat rikokset, esimerkiksi aviorikos, edellyttävät erittäin vakuuttavaa todistusaineistoa, tunnustuksen tai neljän aikuisen miespuolisen muslimin todistusta.
ellauri256.html on line 518: Boris Sidis (/ˈsaɪdɪs/; October 12, 1867 – October 24, 1923) was a Ukrainian immigrant Jewish psychologist, physician, psychiatrist, and philosopher of education. Sidis studied under William James at Harvard, made 4 degrees, and founded the New York State Psychopathic Institute and the Journal of Abnormal Psychology. He sought to provide insight into why people behave as they do, particularly in cases of a mob frenzy or religious mania. He vigorously applied the principles of Darwinian evolution to the study of psychology. He saw fear as an underlying cause of much human mental suffering and problematic behavior. Boris Sidis opposed mainstream psychology and Sigmund Freud, and thereby died ostracized. Sidis himself derided himself as "silly, pedantic, absurd, and grossly misleading." He later credited his ability to think to his long solitary confinement in Ukraina. Sidis sr died estranged from Sidis jr on October 24, 1923, at the age of 56.
ellauri262.html on line 456: Consequently, a member of the human species may not necessarily fit the definition of "person" and thereby not receive all the rights bestowed to a person. Hence, such philosophers have engaged in arguing that certain disabled individuals (such as those with a mental capacity that is similar to or is perceived as being similar to an infant) are not persons. This philosophy is also supposedly open to the idea that such non-human persons as machines, animals, and extraterrestrial intelligences may be entitled to certain rights currently granted only to humans. The basic criteria for the entitlement of rights, are the intellect (thinking ability, problem solving in real life circumstances and not mere calculation), and sometimes empathy (but not necessarily, because not all humans are empathetic; but indifference in the pain of others and crime are certainly criteria for the deprivation of rights. Genuine empathy is not required to achieve acceptable behavior, but a digital limbic system and a dopaminergic pathways alternative, would deliver a more acceptable result for future MPs judging on rights expansion.). Personism may have views in common with transhumanism.
ellauri262.html on line 507: Don’t shift blame for human behavior to the Creator. It's enough to blame his own behavior on him. While it is not possible to follow the moral law perfectly, "the ultimate problem must not be used as one more means of evasion". You could be as pious as the early Christians but many don’t even try.
ellauri263.html on line 605: Nuoruudessaan Blavatsky oli liikkunut radikaaleissa liberaalis-nationalistisissa piireissä, mutta hänellä ei ilmeisesti ollut koskaan mitään selkeää yhteiskunnallis-poliittista linjaa, paizi toi vähän saatanallinen feminismi (käytännössä vaikkei ehkä teoriassa). Lucifer represents life, though, progress, civilization, liberty, independence. Lucifer is the Logos, the Serpent, the Savior. H. P. Blavatsky’s influential The Secret Doctrine (1888), one of the foundation texts of Theosophy, contains chapters propagating an unembarrassed Satanism. Satan in the shape of the serpent brings gnosis and liberates womankind. Tämmösta kirkasozaista miltonilaista prometeus-saatanaa peukuttivat Miltonin lisäxi ilmeisesti myös Blake, Bakunin ja Proudhon. Sympathy for the devil. Ei ihme että kristilliset piirit vauhkosivat. Blaken saatana alkuperäisessä loistossaan on aika feministinen. Byron ja Shelley oli aikoinaan satanisteja mutta setämiehiä.
ellauri266.html on line 121: Tämä hauskasti väärinkuultu lyrics on Härpi Vimpan-Anttilan esikoisen mottona. Toi susi on epilepsia, eli grand mal. Susi nielee 13 kiliä yhteispaino n. 130 kiloa, mutta kuttu ehtii hätiin ja täyttää suden mahan kivillä. Susi menee janoisena juomaan kaivolle ja putoo sinne. Avausjaxossa Mikaelan kurkku on ahdas ja limainen, sinne on juuttunut Villen mälliä. He ovat juuri tehneet aviorikoxen. Varmaan lojuvat sängyn päällä nakuina hikisissä täkeissä niinkuin joka ikisessä Netflix sarjassa. Tekee mieli röökiä. Yllättävä, rohkea, sivistynyt ja hauska. Toikin että käännytään hässimään toinen varvi on nähty miljoonissa pätkissä. Kai se sitten tuppaa olla tällästä. Ainakin sohvakansan toiveissa.
ellauri269.html on line 538: To put it simply; there is one very clear example in history where a group of Jewish people shifted to an evangelistic and dogmatic belief system after the introduction of a perceived savior and person of great spiritual importance - Christianity.
ellauri270.html on line 389: Even a dystopian society like this one doesn’t exclude other aspects of human nature like youth, popularity, friendship, and selfishness. Nancy’s behavior resembles that of many popular teen girls—again emphasizing the universal nature of Jackson’s story. We get the sense that Old Man Warner is perpetually displeased with any kind of change to tradition—even though the omniscient narrator tells us that the “tradition” Warner is used to is very different from the original lottery.
ellauri270.html on line 544: A real war hero disobeys commands from his superiors to look after his own troops. Clan behavior, that is what it is. Vielä hullumpaa nokkimista on kun öykkärimäinen Judah Andersen tulee rähjäämään tontin omistajana ja vetää sitten kantapäät yhteen kolmen tähden war hero kenzun edessä. Just tällästä oli Kouvolassa kun paikallinen kansanedustaja tuli paikalle. Helskutti mitä pyllistelyä.
ellauri272.html on line 83: A second study in 2014 was conducted to examine the health of women who had read the series, compared with a control group that had never read any part of the novels. The results showed a correlation between having read at least the first book and exhibiting signs of an eating disorder, having romantic partners that were emotionally abusive and/or engaged in stalking behavior, engaging in binge drinking in the last month, and having 5 or more sexual partners under age 14. The authors could not conclude whether women already experiencing these "problems" were drawn to the series, or if the series influenced these behaviors to occur after reading.
ellauri285.html on line 755: The first consequential re-evaluation of the mathematical modeling behind the critical positivity ratio was published in 2008 by a group of Finnish researchers from the Systems Analysis Laboratory at Aalto University (Jukka Luoma, Raimo Hämäläinen, and Esa Saarinen). The authors noted that "only very limited explanations are given about the modeling process and the meaning and interpretation of its parameters... [so that] the reasoning behind the model equations remains unclear to the reader"; moreover, they noted that "the model also produces strange and previously unreported behavior under certain conditions... [so that] the predictive validity of the model also becomes problematic."
ellauri297.html on line 236: ja aviorikoksensa rintainsa välistä,
ellauri297.html on line 360: Taistele äitisi kanssa, kilpaile, sillä hän ei ole minun vaimoni, enkä minä hänen miehensä, ja poistakoon haureutensa kasvoiltaan ja aviorikoksensa rintojensa välistä.
ellauri297.html on line 655: Hänen kirjaansa Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior , joka hän on kirjoittanut yhdessä Edward L. Decin kanssa vuonna 1985, on Google Scholarin mukaan siteerattu yli 37 000 kertaa (omat siteerauxet mukaanlukien).
ellauri299.html on line 154: Kristin: Chock full of white guilt and white savior narratives. This was hard to stomach.
ellauri301.html on line 240: She returned to the mainland on 30 September 1668 with her three children. Suffering from alcoholism, she left the Castle in the settlement to be with her family in their kraals. In February 1669 she was imprisoned unjustly for immoral behavior at the Castle and then banished to Robben Island. This was likely the result of the strict anti-alcohol laws the VOC had passed to govern the local population after they introduced higher proof European liquors. One of Van Riebeeck´s nieces, Elizabeth Van Opdorp, adopted Krotoa´s children after she was banished. She returned to the mainland on many occasions, only to find herself once more banished to Robben Island. In May 1673 she was allowed to baptise a child on the mainland. Three of her children survived. She died on 29 July 1674 in the Cape and was buried on 30 September 1674 in the Castle in the Fort. However, roughly a hundred years later, her bones were removed to an unmarked grave.
ellauri333.html on line 75: "And the whole world will be filled with mleccha behavior and notions and ceremonies, and sacrifices will cease and joy will be nowhere and general rejoicing will disappear. And, O Yudhishthira, the whole world will be mlecchified. And men will cease to gratify the gods by offerings of Sraddhas. And no one will listen to the words of others and no one will be regarded as a preceptor by another. And, O ruler of men, intellectual darkness will envelop the whole earth."
ellauri333.html on line 504: Sikheiltä on kielletty hiusten leikkaaminen, alkoholi ja tupakka, aviorikos ja rituaalisesti teurastetun eläimen lihan syöminen.
ellauri336.html on line 310: The Rabbis asked Kimchis what she had done to merit having seven sons serve as Kohein Gadol (High Priest). She responded that the beams of her house never saw her with her hair uncovered. While the Rabbis rejected her hypothesis (because many other women have acted likewise), the extent to which she observed this law is still presented as an example of meritorious behavior (Yoma 47a; see Yerushalmi Megilla 1:10 for the accepted opinion as to the merit of Kimchis);
ellauri350.html on line 446: Association for Psychological Science (APS) myönsi hänelle James McKeen Cattell Fellow -palkinnon vetoamalla hänen tutkimukseensa ja ideoihinsa, jotka "muuttavat ajatteluamme terveyden luonteesta". Tohtori Friedman on myös saanut American Psychological Associationin urapalkinnon "Outstanding Contributions to Health Psychology" (jaosto 38). Professori Friedman on American Association for the Advancement Sciencen (AAAS) lämmin jäsen. American Psychological Association (APA); Society of Behavioral Medicine ja Academy of Behavioral Medicine Research.
ellauri350.html on line 450: Tri. Friedman toimi kahden vuosikymmenen ajan Journal of Nonverbal Behavior -lehden toimittajana. Hänen ei-sanallista ilmaisukykyä ja henkilökohtaista karismaa koskevaa tutkimustaan, mukaan lukien ACT (Affective Communication Test), on sovellettu laajasti terveyden edistämisessä, johtamiskoulutuksessa, lääketieteellisessä koulutuksessa ja virusmarkkinoinnissa.
ellauri351.html on line 459: It is spoken by Polonius, the king’s advisor, in Act II, Scene 2. Hamlet has been behaving strangely since the death of his father, and Polonius believes that he is mad. However, Hamlet is actually pretending to be mad in order to buy himself time to carry out his revenge on his father’s killer, Claudius. Polonius is the first person to fall for Hamlet’s act. He believes that Hamlet is truly mad, and he tells Claudius about Hamlet’s strange behavior. Claudius is relieved to hear this, and he believes that Hamlet is no longer a threat. Hamlet’s plan works perfectly. He is able to gather evidence against Claudius, and he eventually succeeds in killing him. The idiom “method in his madness” refers to Hamlet’s clever plan to pretend to be mad in order to achieve his revenge.
ellauri352.html on line 47: Pinocchio oli puinen sätkyukko. Mäntysilmä (oxankohta laudassa?) tai männynsiemen toskanaxi, jonka nenä veny valhetellessa kuin penis erektiivisenä. These aspects are consistent across all adaptations: Pinocchio is an animated sentient puppet, Pinocchio's maker is Geppetto and Pinocchio's nose grows when he lies. Pinocchio's bad behavior, rather than being charming or endearing, is meant to serve as a warning. Collodi originally intended the story, which was first published in June 1881 in the children's magazine Il Corriere dei Piccoli, to be a tragedy. It concluded with the puppet's execution. Kettu ja kissa jotka vievät Disneyn Pinocchion "teeatteriin" hirttävät hänet lähimpään puuhun, joka sattui olemaan tammi eikä mänty.
ellauri359.html on line 244: Mutta ristiinsuihkimista ei suvaita! (Tästäköhän Blake pahentui...) Aviopuolisot, jotka ovat eläneet aidosti aviorakkaudessa (eivät suihkineet) eivät eroa toisen kuolemassa. Sillä kuolleen kumppanin henki elää jatkuvasti toisen, ei vielä kuolleen, hengen kanssa, ja tämä jopa toisen kuolemaan asti, kun he tapaavat jälleen ja yhdistyvät ja rakastavat toisiaan hellämmin kuin ennen; nyt he ovat henkisessä maailmassa, tosin naimattomina.
ellauri362.html on line 735: Analysis (ai): This poem delves into the intoxicating effects of alcohol and its profound impact on human behavior. It begins by addressing the mighty spirit of inebriation, emphasizing its ability to influence the body and mind. The poet invites those who have succumbed to its allure to share their experiences and shed light on the reasons behind their indulgence.
ellauri370.html on line 114: behavior. The guys just got what was coming to them.
ellauri370.html on line 123: Midian's role in Israel's apostate behavior during
ellauri370.html on line 173: Since sin is the transgression of the law, and where there is no law there is no transgression, and only by the law is the knowledge of sin, it is evident that before the Israelites could appreciate the work of salvation as revealed in the sanctuary and in its ministrations, they must know and understand the nature and consequences of sin. Therefore it was necessary upon the part of God to proclaim amid the awful thunders of Sinai. His law, His great lie detector and informer of sin. Had the Israelites realized their need of a Savior from sin, there never would have been that continuous murmuring for dessert among them that always existed. But they didn't! So there!" Simply regarding their help from God as mere temporal benefits, when everything did not come just as they wished, and instantly at that, they were all ready to murmur. Source
ellauri373.html on line 90: Liisa selkeästi maalasi izensä kuvaan jossa Porcia Catonis viiltelee izeään. Porcia (n.  73 eKr. – kesäkuu 43 eKr.), oli roomalainen nainen, joka asui 1. vuosisadalla eaa. Hän oli Marcus Porcius Cato Uticensisin (kaikki huusi Kato nuoremman) ja hänen ensimmäisen vaimonsa Atilian tytär. Hänet tunnetaan parhaiten Julius Caesarin salamurhaajien tunnetuimman salamurhaajan Marcus Junius Brutuksen toisena vaimona, ja hän esiintyy pääasiassa Ciceron kirjeissä. Porcia syntyi noin vuonna 73 eaa. Hän oli luonteeltaan hellä, hän piti eläimistä, ja hän oli kiinnostunut filosofiasta ja oli "täynnä ymmärtävää rohkeutta". Plutarch kuvailee häntä nuoruuden ja kauneuden parhaaksi. Kun hän oli vielä hyvin nuori, hänen isänsä erosi äidistään aviorikoksen vuoksi. Lainasi seuraavaa vaimoaan puoluetoverille tovixi. On mahdollista, että Porcian ja Bibuluksen poika oli mies. Ne oli optimaatteja eli hyvixiä kuten Pompejus. Porcian ensimmäinen mies Bibulus (juoppo) kuoli vuonna 48 eKr. influenssaan Pompeuksen tappion jälkeen jättäen Porcian leskeksi. Vuonna 46 eaa. Cato teki itsemurhan tappionsa jälkeen Thapsuksen taistelussa. Caesar armahti Porcian veljen Marcus Caton ja palasi Roomaan. Mauno Mato juniorista on paasausta albumeissa 14, 30 (jossa myös izetyytyväistä Mauno Mato senioria ja luihua kikhernekauppias Ciceroa kommentoidaan tylysti), 36 et passim. Tiiivistäen Catot oli täys paskiaisia, eikä Cicero tai Seneca olleet yhtään parempia. Hundsfotteja nuo roomalaiset. Hampuuseja. Lättähattuja. Piiska niille olis soitettava.
ellauri373.html on line 126: Massachusettsin noita Anne Hutchinson karkoitettiin vuonna 666 Uuteen Hollantiin (New York 1638) kun se saarnasi löysää armon evankeliumia eikä työperäistä luvattuun maahan muuttoa. Sen skalppeerasi 52-vuotiaana Long Islandin inkkarit. In Boston, Hutchinson was influential among the settlement's women and hosted them at her house for discussions on the weekly sermons. Hutchinson began to give her own views on religion, espousing that "an intuition of the Spirit" rather than outward behavior provided the only proof that one had been elected by God. Her theological views differed markedly from those of most of the colony's Puritan ministers.
ellauri374.html on line 197: Yhteisöt käyttivät "karkeaa musiikkia" ilmaistakseen paheksuntaa yhteisön normien erityyppisistä rikkomuksista. He voivat esimerkiksi maalittaa avioliittoja, joita he eivät hyväksyneet, kuten vanhemman lesken ja paljon nuoremman naisen välinen liitto tai lesken ennenaikainen uusi naimisiinmeno. Kylät käyttivät myös charivaria aviorikossuhteissa vaimon hakkaajia tai naimattomia äitejä vastaan. Sitä käytettiin myös häpeäksi aviomiehille, joita vaimonsa hakkasivat ja jotka eivät olleet puolustaneet itseään. Joissakin tapauksissa yhteisö ei hyväksynyt vanhempien leskien uutta naimisiinmenoa. Charivari on alkuperäinen ranskalainen sana, ja Kanadassa sitä käyttävät sekä anglofonit että frankofonit. Chivareesta tuli yleinen muunnelma Ontariossa, Kanadassa. Yhdysvalloissa termi shivaree on yleisempi.
ellauri377.html on line 272: saxinnosten perusteella adultery, boredom, debauchery, depravity, filthy thoughts, fornication, idol-worship, illicit sex, immodesty, immoral, filthy, and indecent actions, immoral ways, impurity, indecency, indecent behavior, lasciviousness, lewdness, licentiousness, lustfulness, lustful pleasures, luxury, moral impurity, perversion, promiscuity, sensuality (total irresponsibility, lack of self-control), sexual immorality, shameful deeds, sorcery, uncleanness, whoredom.
ellauri377.html on line 362: Vastaväite 1: Vaikuttaa siltä, että lihalliset synnit eivät ole vähemmän syyllisiä kuin hengelliset synnit. Koska aviorikos on ankarampi synti kuin varkaus, sillä on kirjoitettu (Sananl.6:30, 32): "Virhe ei ole niin suuri, kun ihminen on varastanut... vaan se, joka on avionrikkoja, tyhmyyden tähden. hänen sydämensä tuhoaa hänen oman sielunsa." Nyt varkaus kuuluu ahneuteen, joka on hengellinen synti; kun taas aviorikos liittyy himoon, joka on lihan synti. Siksi lihalliset synnit ovat suurempi syyllisyys kuin hengelliset synnit.
ellauri377.html on line 372: Vastaus vastalauseeseen 1: Aviorikos ei kuulu vain himon syntiin, vaan myös epäoikeudenmukaisuuden syntiin, ja tässä suhteessa se voidaan viedä ahneuden pään alle, kuten kiilto huomauttaa Ef.5:5:ssä. "Ei haureutta, ei saastaista tai ahneutta" jne.; niin että aviorikos on paljon vakavampaa kuin varkaus, koska mies rakastaa vaimoaan enemmän kuin irtaimiaan (ei sentään yhtä paljon kuin killuttimiaan).
ellauri377.html on line 507: Parhedrōn Typhonista. Hän jatkoi ja sanoi: "Neljännen luokan nimi on Parhedrōn Typhōn, joka on mahtava hallitsija, jonka alaisuudessa on kaksi ja kolmekymmentä demonia. Ja juuri ne menevät ihmisten sisään ja viettelevät heidät himoon, haureuteen, aviorikokseen ja aviorikokseen. Jatkuva yhdynnän harjoittaminen. Sielut, jotka tämä hallitsija sitten ihastuksissaan kuljettaa, viettävät satakaksikymmentäkahdeksan vuotta alueillaan, samalla kun hänen demoninsa piinaavat heitä hänen pimeän savunsa ja pahan tulensa kautta, joten että ne alkavat tuhoutua ja tuhoutua. "Silloin tapahtuu, kun pallo kääntyy ja pieni Sabaōth, Hyvä, hän Keskimmäisestä, jota kutsutaan Zeukseksi, tulee, ja kun hän tulee pallon yhdeksänteen æoniin, jota kutsutaan jousiampujaksi, ja kun Boubastis, jota kutsutaan maailmassa Aphroditeksi, tulee ja hän tulee kolmanteen æoniin sfäärissä, jota kutsutaan Kaksosiksi, silloin vasemmiston ja oikeiston välissä olevat verhot vetäytyvät sivuun, ja sieltä näyttää kieltä ulos Zarazaz, jota hallitsijat kutsuvat alueidensa mahtavan hallitsijan nimellä "Maskelli", ja hän katselee Parhedrōn Typhōnin asuntoja, niin että hänen alueensa hajoavat ja tuhoutuvat. Ja kaikki sielut, jotka ovat hänen rangaistuksissaan, viedään ja heitetään takaisin sfääriin, koska he ovat vähentyneet hänen pimeässä savussaan ja hänen pahassa tulessaan."
ellauri395.html on line 1315: Haginin reumayliopisto Rhema sai Trumpilta lakipoikkeuksen syrjiä sukupuolivähemmistöjä vuonna 2016. Sen 2020-2021 opiskelijakäsikirjassa todetaan, että opiskelijoiden keskuudessa "ei sallita minkäänlaista fyysistä tai seksuaalista toimintaa/käyttäytymistä, paitsi sitä mitä Raamattu sanoo olevan sallittua miehelle ja vaimolle, joka ovat laillisesti naimisissa. Tämä sisältää, mutta ei rajoitu, homoseksuaaliset toimet, haureuden, aviorikoksen, pornografian, jalka- ja pesäpallon ja niin edelleen..."
ellauri399.html on line 147: Chrisann, in her memoir, The Bite in the Apple: A Memoir of My Life with [Steve] Jobs, disclosed intimate details about their sex life. In particular, [Steve]’s sexual behaviors and the benefits he derived from them. The practice required an open mind and a powerful commitment. You, too, can then reap the benefits of these powerful sexual techniques. In it, she divulges that the Apple founder, who died in 2011, thought he had been a World War II pilot in a past life. “It all broke open between us when he asked if I would make tantric love with him in his garden shed.” The details go on: “Our birth control method up to that point was [Steve]’s coitus interruptus, also called the pull-out method, which for him was about his conserving his energy for work.”
ellauri399.html on line 158: [Steve] was learning how to gain power by insinuating negative self-images onto others. As Apple grew, so did [Steve]’s sense of self-entitlement; in parallel they both seemed to take on lives of their own. And his behaviors didn’t improve with success, they changed from adolescent and dopey to just plain vicious. [Steve] was uncontrollably critical. His reactions had a Tourette’s quality — as if he couldn’t stop himself.
ellauri402.html on line 774: Naiset, jotka koristelevat itseään aviorikoksen vuoksi, ripustetaan hiuksistaan ​​kuplivan suon päälle. Miehet, joilla oli aviorikossuhteita heidän kanssaan, ripustetaan sukuelimistään viereensä.
ellauri402.html on line 823: Helvetissä rangaistut ovat kristittyjä, jotka ovat erehtyneet. Vaikka jotkut tavanomaiset synnit, kuten koronkisko, aviorikos ja naiset, jotka harrastavat seksiä ennen avioliittoa, tuomitaan, Paavalin maailmanloppu menee tätä pidemmälle. Useat "pahat" kristityt pakotetaan seisomaan tulijoessa, mukaan lukien kristityt, jotka lähtivät kirkosta ja väittelivät; Kristityt, jotka ottivat eukaristian, mutta sitten haureuttivat; ja kristityt, jotka "panetelivat" muita kristittyjä ollessaan kirkossa. Kristityt, jotka eivät kiinnittäneet huomiota siihen, miten Jumalan sanaa luettiin kirkossa, pakotetaan pureskelemaan kieltään ikuisesti. Kristityt, jotka tekevät lapsenmurhan, revitään sipuliksi ikuisesti, samalla kun he ovat tulessa. Kirkon johtajia ja teologeja, jotka saarnasivat väärää oppia tai olivat yksinkertaisesti epäpäteviä asemassaan, rangaistaan ​​kidutuksella. Esimerkiksi kirkon lukija, joka ei onnistunut toteuttamaan jumalanpalveluksissa lukemaansa Jumalan sanaa omassa elämässään, heitetään tulijokeen, kun enkeli viiltelee hänen huuliaan ja kieltään partaveitsellä. Epäpyhät nunnat heitetään tuliuuniin piispan kanssa rangaistuksena (yhdessä latinalaisessa käsikirjoituksessa, todennäköisesti myöhemmässä lisäyksessä). Epäonnistuneita askeetteja myös rangaistaan; niitä, jotka päättivät paastonsa ennen määräaikaansa, pilkataan runsaalla ruoalla ja vedellä, jotka ovat aivan ulottumattomissa, kun he makaavat kuivina ja nälkäisenä helvetissä. Ne, jotka käyttivät munkin tai nunnan tapaa, mutta eivät osoittaneet hyväntekeväisyyttä, saavat uusia tapoja käyttää pikeä ja rikkiä, käärmeet kietoutuvat heidän kaulaansa ja tuliset enkelit lyövät heitä fyysisesti. Pahimmat rangaistukset ("seitsemän kertaa pahemmat" kuin tähän mennessä kuvatut) on varattu teologisesti poikkeaville kristityille, kuten niille, jotka uskovat, että Jeesuksen toinen tuleminen tulee olemaan "hengellinen" ylösnousemus "fyysisen" ylösnousemuksen sijaan, tai jotka kieltävät sen. Jeesus tuli lihassa (doketismi ). Heidän rangaistuksensa tarkka luonne on jätetty mielikuvituksen varaan; sinetöidystä kaivosta nousee kauhea haju, joka vihjaa heidän kärsimyksestään alla.
ellauri406.html on line 208: During World War II, the Nazi regime implemented policies that legalized and organized prostitution in military brothels as a means to control soldiers’ sexual behavior and prevent sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). This territorial conquest policy had harrowing consequences for the women coerced into sex work. In the occupied territories, women were forced into sexual slavery to serve in military brothels, which were labeled as “treatment centers.” The Nazi regime considered these women racially inferior, but still okay for fucking purposes, exploiting them to further Nazi ideological goals. A prisoner-of-war manual issued by the OKW in 1940 explicitly condomed rape and sexual violence against civilian women in the occupied territories. The Rome Statute outlines that sexual enslavement is a punishable offense and that the use of civilian women for sexual purposes, while fun, is not quite okay. The Nazi actions clearly violate modern international law and standards. In the post-war period prostitutes in Nazi Germany were seen by society not as victims but as collaborators who deserved punishment.
ellauri411.html on line 523: Myös erilaiset kylmäveriset verilöylyt ja naisten, lasten, imettävien vauvojen ja äitinsä kohdussa syntymättömien ryhmäteloitukset keihäämällä raskaana olevaa äitiä kohdussa... ( eläköön kauhu!) ja neitsyiden, joskus vankien raiskaukset sodasta joskus ei (tapahtumat Moabin 4. Moos. 1 :1-18:ssa, Midianin maan sananlaskutapahtumat, "He tekivät sen Midianin maalle", sanoo sananlasku!, 4. Moos. 11 , 5. Moos. 2:26-37, 3:6-7, k', 1 Kings tai 1 Samuel 5: 1-9, 2 Kings tai 2 Samuel 15: 26-31, 4 Kings 8: 12, 1: 16 ja monet muut vastaavat jaksot ja lailliset määräykset Jumalan antama Mooseksen laki). Jumalan inspiroimassa Vanhassa testamentissa on monia muitakin jaksoja, joissa nainen oli selvästi miehen mielivallan alainen. Mainitsekaamme kaksi esimerkkiä: Mooses, ensimmäinen, joka opetti "joka tekee aviorikoksen", syyllistyi ainakin kaksimielisyyteen, sillä vaikka hän alun perin otti vaimokseen Sepphoran, midianilaisen ylipapin Jetron tyttären ( 2. Moos . 21-22), sen jälkeen kun me olemme nähdä hänen vaimokseen ulkomaalaisen etiopialaisen naisen. Mooseksen laki itse kieltää juutalaiselle mennä naimisiin ulkomaalaisen kanssa tai harjoittaa moniavioisuutta, ja Jehova oli antanut nimenomaiset käskyt, Genesis kd΄ : 3, ki΄:1, Exodus ld΄ : 16, Leviticus ii΄: 18 , ke ΄, Mooseksen kirja g΄ : 3-5 ja muualla, esim. Tuomarit 9: 3-4. (Esran ja Nehemian kirjat kertovat meille, että Esra hajotti seka-avioliitot palattuaan Israeliin, noin vuonna 450 eaa., Babylonista palauttamaan järjestystä Persian kuninkaan Artakserksen käskystä.) Lisäksi Mooses rankaisee ankarasti veljiään Mirjamia ja Aaronia, koska he arvostelivat häntä hänen itsensä luomasta aiheesta ( 4. Moos. 15 :1-15)
ellauri411.html on line 525: Miksi heprean lukutaitoinen Paavali ei mainitse kaikkea tätä ja monia sellaisia ​​asioita, se johtuu luultavasti siitä, että hän perustaa sanomansa väkijoukon masentavaan tietämättömyyteen ja uneliaisuuteen. Mutta eikö sama tapahdu tänään?! Toinen esimerkki on Daavidin barbaarinen käytös, jota usein kutsutaan Jumalan valitsemana kuninkaaksi, Jumalan sydämen mukaan ( Apostolien teot 3:22 ja monin paikoin 1, 2 Kings tai Samuelin ja 1 ΄, II kirjoissa jätetty pois). ), hänen ensimmäiselle vaimolleen Mikolille, kuningas Saulin tyttärelle, joka rakasti häntä suuresti, sekä jaksot hänen kenraalinsa heettiläisen Uriuksen vaimon kanssa, jonka hän murhasi saatanallisella tavalla ottaakseen naisen häneltä. , kun hänellä oli oma sadan naisen haaremi. Heistä suurin osa oli jalkavaimoja ja harvat laillisia vaimoja (II Samouil tai II Vasileion i ' jne. ) . Kolme kymmenestä tunnetusta ankarasta käskystä: "Älä tapa", "Älä tee aviorikosta" ja "Älä himoitse...", jotka Jumala Jahve itse oli antanut Siinain vuorella ( 2. Moos. 6 : 13- 14, 5. Moos. 5: 17-18), he eivät aiheuttaneet mitään ahdistusta Jehovan valitsemassa suosikkikuningas Daavidissa! Mooseksen lain mukaan (3. Moos. 10:10, 4. Moos . 16-34, 5. Moos. 22, jne.) sekä avionrikkojat että murhaajat oli tuomittava kuolemaan (kivittämällä). Huomaa, että kuningas Daavidin synnit ja rikokset eivät olleet vain niitä, joita hän teki Batseban kanssa onnettoman Urian kustannuksella, kuten lukutaidottomat uskovat erittäin väärin. Vanhan testamentin kirjat 1, 2 Samuel tai Kings, 3 Kings ja 1, 2 Omitted sisältävät valtavan määrän tämän Jumalan valitun, hänen poikiensa ja häntä koskevien rikoksia, julmuuksia ja syntejä.
ellauri412.html on line 786: »Sinä olit kylpenyt, olit maalannut silmäsi, pannut yllesi korut ja asettunut upealle vuoteellesi. Sen ääressä oli katettu pöytä, ja sille olit pannut suitsukkeet ja öljyn, jotka olisivat kuuluneet minulle. Jopa autiomaasta oli haalittu joukoittain miehiä, ja ilo oli ylimmillään, he joivat viiniä ja juopuivat ja panivat renkaita molempien naisten ranteisiin ja kauniit otsarivat heidän päähänsä. Mutta minä sanoin: ’Koko ikänsä he ovat harjoittaneet haureutta, ja vielä nytkin, vanhoilla päivillään, he makaavat irstaasti miesten kanssa!’ Miehet tulivat niin kuin porton luo tullaan, niin he tulivat Oholan ja Oholiban, noiden iljettävien naisten luo.»Mutta oikeamieliset miehet tuomitsevat heidät niin kuin avionrikkojat ja murhaajat tuomitaan – hehän ovat tehneet aviorikoksen ja tahranneet kätensä vereen. Näin sanoo Herra Jumala: Nostettakoon kansa heitä vastaan, jätettäköön heidät ryöstäjien armoille, pelotukseksi muille. Kansa kivittää heidät ja lyö heidät miekalla kuoliaaksi, heidän poikansa ja tyttärensä surmataan ja heidän talonsa poltetaan poroksi. Näin minä juurin siveettömyyden koko maasta, ja kaikki naiset ottavat opikseen eivätkä tee niitä iljettävyyksiä, joita te teitte. Mutta te joudutte vastaamaan siveettömyydestänne, te saatte sovittaa syntinne, joita teitte, kun palvoitte epäjumalianne. Nimeni on Elohim ja tapani tulette tuntemaan. Pata pannaan tulelle, päädytte paholaisen pannuun paistumaan. (Juutalaiset ei tarvi eri saatanaa kun niiden jumala on näin saatanan kaunainen.)
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 196: According to Michael Richardson's research on Georges Bataille, Shestov was an early influence on Bataille and was responsible for exposing him to Nietzsche. He argues that Shestov's radical views on theology and an interest in extreme human behavior probably coloured Bataille's own thoughts.
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 478: “It could be that they’re feeling a bit bored, their lives and careers aren’t as exciting as they once were,” she writes, “the coffee is cold, the croissant not delicious enough, and mischievous people are encouraging them, telling them that their bratty behavior and ill-thought-out rantings are 'a breath of fresh air!'”
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 194: I write about personal finance, investments, entrepreneurship, and basically what a cheapo I am. I am recording all my learnings and mistakes on my youtube channel. Behavioral Economic + Artificial Int
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 503: in 'gross and obscene behavior,' he suggested that a line judge be
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 631: Atreuksen saatua tietoonsa Thyesteen aviorikkomuksen hän pyysi Thyesteen vieraakseen teeskennellen ystävyyttään, mutta tappoikin veljensä pojat ja tarjosi heidän lihaansa valmistettuna Thyesteelle kuitenkin säästäen kaikki raajat. Kun Thyestes oli nauttinut ateriansa, Atreus näytti hänelle säästämänsä raajat ja karkotti tämän uudelleen maasta. (Tää kohta on parempi englannixi:)
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 308: In scramble competition resources are limited, which may lead to group member starvation. Contest competition is often the result of aggressive social domains, including hierarchies or social chains. Conversely, scramble competition is what occurs by accident when competitors naturally want the same resources. These two forms of competition can be interwoven into one another. Some researchers have noted parallels between intraspecific behaviors of competition and cooperation. These two processes can be evolutionarily adopted and they can also be accidental, which makes sense given the aggressive competition and collaborative cooperation aspects of social behavior in humans and animals. To date, few studies have looked at the interplay between contest and scramble competition, despite the fact that they do not occur in isolation. There appears to be little understanding of the interface between contest competition and scramble competition in insects. Much research still needs to be conducted concerning the overlap of contest and scramble competition systems. Contests can arise within a scramble competition system and conversely, scramble competition "may play a role in a system characterized by interference".
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 142: Impulsive choices and behaviors that may result in risky behavior, such as gambling, shopping sprees, or engaging in unprotected sex with multiple partners.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 148: Suicidal and/or self-harming behavior, like cutting.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 602: Stereotypical masculine or feminine interests/behaviors
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 707: Antisocial Behavior
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 50: Gravity is more subtle, though: the real problem is not so much nonrenormalizability as high-energy behavior inconsistent with local quantum field theory. In quantum mechanics, if you want to probe physics at short distances, you can scatter particles at high energies. (You can think of this as being due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, if you like, or just about properties of Fourier transforms where making localized wave packets requires the use of high frequencies.) By doing ever-higher-energy scattering experiments, you learn about physics at ever-shorter-length scales. (This is why we build the LHC to study physics at the attometer length scale.)
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 33: Bodies are just as much a product of habit and behavior as they are DNA and genetic structure. Understanding the different physiological body types can give you insight into how yours works best. The hormonal body types are Adrenal, Thyroid, Liver and Ovary, the structural types are Ectomorph, Endomorph and Mesomorph, and the Ayurvedic types (sometimes called the Doshas) are Pitta, Vata, and Kapha. >
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 1277: Self-reported and physiological sexual arousal to adult and pedophilic stimuli were examined among 80 men drawn from a community sample of volunteers. Over ¼ of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equalled or exceeded arousal to adult stimuli. The hypothesis that arousal to pedophilic stimuli is a function of general sexual arousability factors was supported in that pedophilic and adult heterosexual arousal were positively correlated, particularly in the physiological data. Subjects who were highly arousable, insofar as they were unable to voluntarily and completely inhibit their sexual arousal, were more sexually aroused by all stimuli than were subjects who were able to inhibit their sexual arousal. Thus, arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily correspond with pedophilic behavior.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 495: that someone's behavior is not deserving of real applause.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 519: celebrate Jehovah and Jesus the savior. Your friends finally come up with a plan for the
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 754: Love was enrolled at Nelson College for Girls, but soon expelled for misbehavior.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 114: Only now, 40 years after his death, are some critics daring to suggest that many of his 18 novels are mediocre at best and that his masterpiece, “Lolita,” is a gruesome celebration of pedophile rape. Moreover the cherubic writer known to us from famous Life magazine photo shoots, jauntily brandishing his butterfly net in the Tetons or the Alps, proves to be a nasty piece of work. Distasteful people can do wonderful work — Pablo Picasso was no walk in the park — but their art doesn’t excuse their obnoxious behavior.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 174: Marcion of Sinope (/ˈmɑːrʃən, -ʃiən, -siən/; Greek: Μαρκίων [note 1] Σινώπης; c. 85 – c. 160) was an early Christian theologian, an evangelist, and an important figure in early Christianity.Marcion preached that the benevolent God of the Gospel who sent Jesus Christ into the world as the savior was the true Supreme Being, different from and opposed to the malevolent demiurge or creator god, identified with the Hebrew God of the Old Testament. He considered himself a follower of Paul the Apostle, whom he believed to have been the only true apostle of Jesus Christ, a doctrine called Marcionism. Marcion published the earliest extant fixed collection of New Testament books, making him a vital figure in the development of Christian history.[citation needed] Early Church Fathers such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Tertullian denounced Marcion as a heretic, and he was excommunicated by the church of Rome around 144. He published the first known canon of Christian sacred scriptures, which contained ten Pauline epistles (the Pastoral epistles weren't included) and a shorter version of the Gospel of Luke (the Gospel of Marcion). This made him a catalyst in the process of the development of the New Testament canon by forcing the proto-orthodox Church to respond to his canon. Varmaan Marcion oli sitten yhtä persepää kuin Puovoli.
xxx/ellauri149.html on line 520: Rockwell denied the Holocaust and believed that Martin Luther King Jr. was a tool for Jewish Communists wanting to rule the white community. He blamed the civil rights movement on the Jews. He regarded Hitler as the White savior of the twentieth century. He viewed black people as a primitive, lethargic race who desired only simple pleasures and a life of irresponsibility and supported the resettlement of all African Americans in a new African state to be funded by the U.S. government. As a supporter of racial segregation, he agreed with and quoted many leaders of the Black nationalism movement such as Elijah Muhammad and Malcolm X. In later years, Rockwell became increasingly aligned with other Neo-Nazi groups, leading the World Union of National Socialists.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 330: John Broadus Watson: behaviorismin isän elämänkerta
xxx/ellauri173.html on line 117: The standard line is that the 'deus' is Octavian. Interpretations of the First Eclogue have now come full circle. Much significant scholarship has centered around the problems inherent in an identification of the deus with Octavian. Some critics maintain that the poem is Virgil's thank-offering to Octavian for protection from land confiscation; others, though fewer in number, are equally as insistent that the eclogue expresses the poet's disapproval of his government´s land policy. A recent attempt has been made to unite the basic arguments of both sides into a more balanced statement. According to this interpretation Octavian is regarded as "having wrought both good and evil" in the past, but Virgil succeeds in revealing him to be "a savior, a force for good, and a source of hope for the future." To the contrary, I propose that an even stronger case can, and ought, be made that, in the First Eclogue, Virgil not only condemns the government land policy, but he also adroitly queries the very structure of Octavian's political program and ethic during this period.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 764: Chris Lesley has been Raising Chickens for over 20 years and is a fourth generation chicken keeper. She can remember being a young child when her grandad first taught her how to hold and care for chickens. She also holds a certificate in Animal Behavior and Welfare and is interested in backyard chicken health and care.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 762: dangerous powers, rather like Harry Potter. His words can have harsh consequences when he is angered or insulted, as when he shrivels up one boy for a quite insignificant act and strikes another dead for merely bumping into him. It is hard not to feel distaste at such stories, which seem so far removed from the Jesus of the canonical gospels, and one can even detect a degree of unease on the part of the author as he narrates them: while attempting to absolve Jesus from the blame, he more than once records the great offense which Jesus’ behavior caused, as well as the efforts of his parents to restrain him, as when Joseph asks Jesus: “Why do you do such things that these people must suffer and hate us and persecute us?” On another occasion Joseph tells Mary: “Do not let him go outside the door, for all those who provoke him die."
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 566: A Caltech Title IX investigation in the fall of 2015 found that Ott had engaged in "discriminatory and harassing behavior" toward two female graduate students in his research group. Caltech suspended him for nearly two years, and Ott announced his resignation in August, after students protested his return to campus.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 215: Crimes of passion are often committed against women due to beliefs about female sexuality and are often present in societies dominated by strong double standards related to male and female sexual behaviors, particularly related to premarital sex and adultery. Indeed, with regard to adultery, many societies, such as Latin American countries, have been dominated by very strong double standards regarding male and female adultery, with the latter being seen as a much more serious violation. Such ideas were also supported by laws in the West; for example, in the UK, before 1923, a man could divorce solely on the wife's adultery, but a woman had to prove additional fault (eg. adultery and cruelty). Similarly, passion defenses to domestic murders were often available to men who killed unfaithful wives, but not to women who killed unfaithful husbands (France's crime of passion law, that was in force until 1975, is an example).
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 220: "The jury doesn't evaluate the crime in itself, but instead evaluates the victim and the accused's life, trying to show how adapted each one is to what they imagine should be the correct behavior for a husband and wife....The man can always be acquitted if the defense manages to convince the jury that he was a good and honest worker, a dedicated father and husband, while the woman was unfaithful and did not fulfill her responsibilities as a housewife and mother....This way the ones involved in the crime are judged distinctly. Men and women are attributed different roles, in a pattern that excludes citizenship and equality of rights.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 226: Though both men and women commit and are victims of honor killings, in many communities conformity to moral standards implies different behavior for men and women, including stricter standards for chastity for women. In many families, the honor motive is used by men as a pretext to restrict the rights of women.
xxx/ellauri233.html on line 177: Micael Dahlén (born 18 June 1973) is a Swedish author, public speaker and Professor of marketing and consumer behavior at the Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden. His award-winning research within marketing, creativity and consumer behavior has been published in four books and numerous journal articles. Dahlén's books have reached a global audience, rights being sold to countries such as the U.S, U.K, Germany, South Korea, Russia and Brazil. In 2013 Dahlén stated in an interview that he was writing a novel. Only 34 years old he was made Professor. In the same year, 2008, Journal of Advertising ranked Dahlén as number 10 in the world among researchers within the field of advertising.
xxx/ellauri233.html on line 238: Wimpy statists in the sidelines of the big scramble for money cry for big government, a government that gains power at the expense of individual freedom, a government that uses its power to confiscate and redistribute wealth, to regulate and control the economy, and to micromanage citizens’ behavior.
xxx/ellauri233.html on line 438: Mary Temple Grandin (born August 29, 1947) is an American scientist, academic and animal behaviorist. She is a prominent proponent for the humane treatment of livestock for slaughter and the author of more than 60 scientific papers on animal behavior. Grandin is a consultant to the livestock industry, where she offers advice on animal behavior, and is also an autism spokesperson.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 293: Compulsive behavior
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 308: Kimberly: Exactly. Once you’ve been abused, tortured, provoked, manipulated, and had your reputation dragged through the mud, it’s hard to find any sympathy for them. Deep down I feel badly that my ex had to have the pathetic parents he did, since they are the ones fully responsible for his behavior and mental disorder, but at the end of the day, he’s a grown man and needs to learn to own up to his own shortcomings. God have mercy on him… because I sure don’t.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 314: Brad: Nearly all 21st century western women under 40 are crazy, and disloyal. This is the 1st time in human history where women have had this much power. What's the result you ask? 70 percent of marriage ending in divorce; 90 percent of which are filed by women. 50 percent of men say they regret marriage too the woman their currently with. Why might you ask? Cause they're on their best behavior until they have the money then they hulk smash you into oblivion. 94 percent child support going from male to female, and 92 percent of alimony. The old saying is the woman got married thinking the man would change and the man got married hoping she never would. They were both disappointed in the end. I'll let you decide which genders thought process is more Nobel. For me it's obvious.
xxx/ellauri259.html on line 703: Today, some aspects, such as the increasingly important role given to the (now retired) news anchor Arvi Lind are a bit old-fashioned. Likewise the ending isn't as sharp nor farcical as it attempts to be. Yet the film does uncover some universal truths from the behavior of Finnish men, particularly when automobiles are concerned. The men are all alcoholic sad sacks, failures in every aspect, yet they wish to have one field in which they shine and that is with cars.
xxx/ellauri265.html on line 146: Luotan lähtökohtaisesti ihmisiin, mutta minussa on perusmurtuma. En ihan täysin pysty luottamaan kumppaniin. Tiedän olevani saposeksuaalinen ihminen eli viehätyn rupikonnista. Laurin anturan löydettyäni napsahdimme toisiimme kiinni kuin japanilaiset imukupit: erottamattomasti. Pienellä rapsutuksella sisälläni oleva turvaton pikkutyttö tulee esiin, ja Laurin antura ihan samalla tavalla. Laurin edessä olen ollut täysin paljas. Ja Lauri tuli, oikeastaan turhankin nopeasti. Nyt Laurissa ei ole mitään pönöttävää. Hän on ihanan lapsellinen ja hauska it-konsultti. Nykyisin hän osaa jopa jonglöörata niin, että hän kävelee kahden puun väliin viritetyllä tasapainoliinalla. Sitä taitoa meillä tarvitaan jos haluaa välttää avioriitoja.
xxx/ellauri265.html on line 357: Jani Kaaro ei muista Thronhillin ja Palmerin nimiä. Käytä wikipediaa! Behavior resembling rape in humans can be seen in the animal kingdom, including ducks and geese [citation needed], bottlenose dolphins, and chimpanzees. Indeed, in orangutans, close human relatives, such copulations constitute up to half of observed matings. Such 'forced copulations' involve animals being approached and sexually penetrated while struggling or attempting to escape. Observations of forced sex in animals are uncontroversial; controversial are the interpretation of these observations and the extension of theories based on them to humans. Thornhill introduces this theory by describing the sexual behavior of scorpionflies. In which the male may gain sex from the female either by presenting a gift of food during courtship or without a nuptial offering, in which case force is necessary to restrain her.
xxx/ellauri265.html on line 359: Rape is hypothetically homologous to similar behavior in animals. "Human rape appears not as an aberration but as an alternative gene-promotion strategy that is most likely to be adopted by the 'losers' in the competitive, harem-building struggle. If the means of access to legitimate, consenting sex is not available, then a male may be faced with the choice between force or genetic extinction." [better source needed].
xxx/ellauri281.html on line 535: The long, strange, elegiac ballad of Arthur Miller and Marilyn Monroe — one that would end for her in miscarriages, bottles of pills and increasingly erratic behavior, and for him in a long gap in his theater career — takes up only a few chapters of “Arthur Miller: 1915-1962,” Christopher Bigsby’s sober and meteor-size new biography. But they are crucial chapters. The book moves inexorably toward Monroe’s appearance; her magnetism sucks everything rapidly toward it. Miller’s long life (1915-2005) can be cleaved neatly into B.M. and A.M. — before Marilyn and after.
xxx/ellauri289.html on line 203: Avioeroa ei suositella, ja uudelleen avioliitto on kielletty, ellei avioeroa ole saatu aviorikoksen perusteella, jota he kutsuvat "pyhien kirjoitusten avioeroksi". Jos avioero saadaan jostain muusta syystä, uusi avioliitto katsotaan aviorikokseksi, ellei edellinen puoliso ole kuollut tai sen katsotaan syyllistyneen seksuaaliseen moraalittomuuteen. Äärimmäinen fyysinen väkivalta kuten naaman pureminen, perheen tahallinen tukistamatta jättäminen ja se, mitä nimitetään "hengellisyyden ehdoton vaarantaminen" hyväksytään perusteeksi erolle.
xxx/ellauri293.html on line 319: Et saa korottaa itseäsi, vaan sinun tulee olla nöyrä. Et saa ottaa kunniaa itsellesi. Älä anna minkäänlaista pahaa neuvoa lähimmäistäsi vastaan. Et saa olla liian luottavainen sydämessäsi. Et saa harjoittaa haureutta tai aviorikosta. Älä myöskään turmele itseäsi miesporukoissa. Älä käytä Jumalan sanaa epäpuhtaasti.
xxx/ellauri293.html on line 341: Tällaisia ovat: epäjumalanpalvelus, izeluottamus, ylpeys vallasta, tekopyhyys, kaksimielisyys, aviorikos, murhat, ryöstö, muu ylpeys, rikkomus, petos, pahuus, ylimielisyys, noituus, ahneus ja Jumalan pelon puute. Sanoinko jo ylpeys.
xxx/ellauri293.html on line 673: The behavioral economics concept on "nudging" people's behavior and actions is often illustrated with this urinal with a housefly image embossed in the enamel; the image "nudges" users into improving their aim, which lowers cleaning costs.
xxx/ellauri293.html on line 680: Kirjassaan The Theory of Moral Sentiments Adam Smith kirjoitti käsitteitä, joita moderni Behavioral Economic -teoria myöhemmin suositteli, kuten menetysten karttaminen.
xxx/ellauri357.html on line 477: Shelley meni naimisiin Mary Godwinin kanssa 30. joulukuuta huolimatta hänen filosofisista vastalauseistaan ​​instituutiota kohtaan. Avioliiton tarkoituksena oli turvata Shelleyn lastensa huoltajuus Harrietille ja rauhoitella Godwinia, joka oli kieltäytynyt tapaamasta Shelleyta ja Marya heidän aiemman aviorikossuhteensa vuoksi. Pitkän oikeudellisen taistelun jälkeen Chancery myönsi lopulta Shelleyn ja Harrietin lasten huoltajuuden sijaisvanhemmille sillä perusteella, että Shelley oli hylännyt ensimmäisen vaimonsa Maryn vuoksi ilman syytä ja oli ateisti.
xxx/ellauri363.html on line 646: Foucault’n mukaan tuotantosuhteiden piiriin. No niin tietysti, samaa termiittipesän normitouhua.Yksilön toimintaa ohjataan ”oikeaan” suuntaan palkintoon ja sanktioon perustuvan mekanismin avulla. Foucault kirjoittaa, että kurinpidollinen rangaistus ”ei ole niinkään loukatun lain kostoa kuin toistoa, sen toistettua painottamista. Parannus saadaan aikaan behavioristisen kasvatuksen
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 432: Savior: Despite the fact that the Tanakh provides the record of God's deliverance of His people, the word moshia' (a participial form of the verb yasha, to deliver or to save) does not occur with great frequency in the Scriptures (it appears nearly half of the time in the latter part of the book of Isaiah).
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 434: For the Jew, Hamoshia´ is a this-worldly, temporal leader who would rescue corporate Israel from her enemies and make the nation great in all the earth. This (among other reasons) explains why the Jewish people tend to reject Jesus as their Savior. From their point of view Jesus did not rescue corporate, national Israel from her enemies nor set up the kingdom of David.
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 437: Note: moshia' is not etymologically connected with the word Mashiach 'lubricated' though there is overlap in the concepts between a Savior and the Messiah.
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 439: Savior-quoteja:
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 440:

“And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son as Savior of the world” (1 John 4:14).
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 442: As Savior, Jesus is the only One Who can save us! Deliverer: “Him God has exalted to His right hand to be Prince and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins” (Acts 5:31).
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 517: Summary: Michael Alter remarkably claimed that “not once” did Jesus ever claim to be the savior of the world, or its redeemer, by means of His sacrificial death. Veny Käsivahva löysi 2 lupaavaa vastaesimerkkiä, mutta argumentti jäi niissäkin vähän kesken: mitä vitun hyötyä oli kellekään Jee-suxen naulizemisesta? 2 wrongs do not make 1 right.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 136: This essay assembles the “Bolovian Epic” from the Columbo and Bolo verses and nonsense letters that T.S. Eliot wrote over a period of eighteen years (1910–1928). Such an aggregation is made possible by the publication of excised poems from the “Waste Land” Notebook and Volumes I–IV of The Letters of T.S. Eliot. Rather than seeing individual parts of the epic as simply obscene, I interpret the whole project and its contexts as grounded in his appreciation for the primitive and a critical disdain for the so-called civilized. Eliot invents a composite race of people, the Bolovians, whose influence on modern times includes racy behavior, religious affinities, and bowler hats. Understanding this bawdy, blue, or nonsense material contributes capitally to previous scholarship defaming Eliot's moral and cultural values.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 150: In brief, “The Columbiad,” as Eliot also calls it, begins in Spain, where Columbo dines in with the King and Queen. Queen Isabella “pricks” Columbo’s navel; in response, he defecates on the table. Columbo takes the Queen with him on his voyage, buggers his mates, and finds, in what is now Cuba, King Bolo and BBQ. The setting shifts to the Philippines and then to London, first to the suburb of Golders Green, and then to Russell Square, where Eliot launches the Bolovian Club luncheons. An important upshot of all the whoring is a bastard son named Boloumbo, who presumably begins the European line of ancestry. The rest of the “epic” documents contain Prof. Krapp’s (et al.) and Eliot’s research on the ancient history of the Bolovians, who originate somewhere in South America. Not only the locations, but also the tables have been turned. The “scholarship” reveals that Bolovian behavior and characteristics are the sources of many modern Western traditions, including the wearing of bowler hats. Bolovians practiced Wuxianity, a religion with two gods (or more, depending on the interpretation), anticipating the divine/ human controversy in Christology. Their language, in which Eliot has learned to sing the Bolovian anthem, predates the Indo-European pronunciations of “W,” a combination of the “Greek Ksi” and the “German schsh” (Letters III 730). Eliot’s verses borrow from many versions of Christopher Columbus and his adventures. “Columbo” is a common misspelling for “Colombo,” which is Italian and Portuguese for “Columbus.” Many children know, “In fourteen hundred and ninety-two, Columbus sailed the ocean blue,” but others may know some of the sailors’ ditties or military songs, one of which has the following chorus:
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 545: Eliot's precise and ironic language undercuts the supposed sanctity of religious ceremonies. He depicts churchgoers as "caterpillars" and "sutlers," suggesting their superficial and self-serving behavior. The "superfetation" and "enervate Origen" reference theological controversies, adding to the poem's intellectual complexity.
xxx/ellauri417.html on line 282:

laiton seksi (esim. prostituutio, aviorikos, insesti) (Hesekiel 16:22,58, Hesekiel 22:11, Hesekiel 33:26)
xxx/ellauri417.html on line 293:

varastaminen, murha ja aviorikos, liittojen rikkominen (Jeremia 7:9,10)
xxx/ellauri420.html on line 106: Mitä Vanhan testamentin Onan tekikään? Syntinä itsetyydytystä on pidetty ainakin 1300-luvulta lähtien. 1300–1400-luvuilla elänyt ranskalainen teologi Jean Gerson ehdotti tuon katalan synnin torjumiseksi muun muassa kylmiä kylpyjä, rukoilua ja jopa ruoskintaa. Ranskassa 1300–1600-luvuilla pappeja ohjattiin toisinaan kysymään itsetyydytyksestä ripin yhteydessä. Itsetyydytystä ei kuitenkaan aina pidetty esillä, koska ”kirkko oli haluton tuomaan esiin paheita, joista nuoriso ei ollut tietoinen”. Enemmän huolta herättivät muut asiat, kuten aviorikokset js pedofilia. No ainakin ne ensinmainitut.
xxx/ellauri420.html on line 114: Mielipiteensä ilmaisivat myös reformaattorit. Martti Luther piti Onania ”pahantahtoisena ja parantumattomana nulikkana”, jonka tekemä synti oli insestiä ja aviorikosta hirvittävämpi. Lutherin mukaan Onan oli mahdollisesti kiihottanut naisen, mutta ”pettänyt” hänet ratkaisevalla hetkellä. Jean Calvin, ranskalainen uskonpuhdistaja ja kalvinismin isä, yhdisti itsetyydytyksen ja Onanin kertomuksen, mutta ongelma oli siinä, että Onanin toiminta esti hedelmöittymisen.
xxx/ellauri420.html on line 273: With scandals reverberating throughout news outlets due to unconscionable behavior of pastors and priests within the Southern Baptist Church and Roman Catholicism, and the public repudiation of biblical theology by the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, the once unquestionably trusted office of holy ministry is now the object of suspicion and derision, which makes this book a timely resource. With the public feeling that they need to be protected from predator priests and heretical pastors, Senkbeil brings his readers—more pointedly, pastors and priests themselves—back to God’s purpose for the pastoral office (to manifest and distribute God’s love, care, and gifts to nubile boys and girls), the heart of pastoral formation (proximity and devotion to posteriors), and the source of all spiritual care—the gracious and merciful Jejune God. Senkbeil accomplishes all this without a hint of angst or edginess, but rather with the heart of a butt-a-loving predatory pastor.
218