David Foster Wallace

David Foster Wallace

Six Things You Didn’t Know About David Foster Wallace

Yeah Fuck David Foster Wallace!

{14:1} Psalmus David. Domine quis habitabit in tabernaculo tuo? aut quis requiescet in monte sancto tuo?

ellauri100.html on line 356: {14:1} A Psalm of David. O Lord, who will dwell in your tabernacle? Or who will rest on your holy mountain?

Jonatan "puhuu" Daavidille

Why beautiful? Human nature never changes. Then as now, people prized physical beauty (Genesis 29:17; Deuteronomy 21:11; 1 Samuel 9:2; 2 Samuel 14:25; Esther 2:2–4). Kings had the privilege and power to surround themselves with beauty, and David’s servants likely thought to win his favor by bringing a beautiful woman into his palace.
ellauri153.html on line 825: Abishag was neither a wife nor a concubine, but her position in the king’s household gave her such high prestige that David’s son Adonijah asked to marry her after the king’s death, but Solomon recognized this as an attempt by Adonijah to make himself king, and he had his brother summarily executed (1 Kings 2:21–25).
ellauri153.html on line 827: Nowhere does the Bible approve of David’s state of affairs—just the opposite! God had warned Israel through Moses that any future king “must not take many wives” (Deuteronomy 17:17). Scripture does not say that Abishag’s presence in David’s bed was a good thing, nor does it present David as a good father. His many children by multiple mothers were a cause of great trouble for him and the whole kingdom (2 Samuel 13; 2 Samuel 15; 1 Kings 12:23–25). His own son and successor, Solomon, ignoring God’s clear warning, took his father’s excesses to a shocking extreme with 700 wives and 300 concubines who led him astray and turned his heart after other gods (1 Kings 11:2–4). The kingdom itself was divided and lost by Solomon’s son shortly after his coronation, barely one generation after the glory of King David (1 Kings 12).
ellauri153.html on line 829: Älkää siis yrittäkö samaa kotona ellette ole Daavidin huonetta ja sukua! Lemmikkieläin kuten pienoissika on kosherimpi ratkaisu. Quod licet iovi non licet bovi!
ellauri153.html on line 832: Abishag tarkoittaa "isän erehdys", eli vahinkolaukaus. Olikohan Abishagkin epähuomiossa pussista pujahtanutta Daavidin huonetta ja sukua? Vitun lampaannussijoita tää setämiesten telttaporukka. Naarasapinat kelpaa niin kauan kun ne on nuoria ja sileitä. Sitte tukka pois ja kyökin puolelle. Uusi hani alle tai takaisin lammaskumppanien perään. Raamattu oli telttaporukoiden some, sinne kerättiin kaikenlaisia hauskoja juoruja ja juttuja. Näitäkin piisaa näitä voideltuja peppuja.
ellauri155.html on line 112: Olen hiljattain käynyt sähköpostien vaihtoa älykkään ja puhuttelevan entisen valkoisen kansallismielisen kanssa, joka on nyt omistautunut anti-natalismille, juutalaisen eteläafrikkalaisen filosofin David Benatarin filosofialle, kertoo Andrew Joyce, Ph.D. Tiivistetysti anti-natalismi väittää, että elämä sisältää kärsimystä, joskus hirvittäviä määriä, ja siksi olemattomuus on aina parempi kuin eläminen ja sitten kuolema.
ellauri155.html on line 442: I introduktionen till psaltarpsalm 34 talas om en Avimelek inför vilken David spelat vansinnig. Beskrivningen stämmer in på den kung Akish av Gat som omtalas i 1 Sam 21:10 – 14.
ellauri155.html on line 507: 34:1 Daavidin psalmi. Daavid lauloi sen lähdettyään Abimelekin luota. Abimelek oli lähettänyt Daavidin pois, kun tämä oli tekeytynyt mielipuoleksi.
ellauri155.html on line 513: Achish trusted David, thinking, ‘He has made himself an utter stench to his people Israel; therefore he shall always be my servant’ ” (27:12).
ellauri155.html on line 515: avid-Ay-David-Pretended-to-be-Insame-Before-Abimelech.jpeg" />
ellauri155.html on line 521: Today’s passage certainly qualifies as one of the more difficult passages of Scripture. It is easy enough to understand what is going on; however, it is difficult to know how to evaluate it. We see in 1 Samuel 27:1–4 that David decided the best way to escape Saul was to flee to Philistine territory and take up residence in the city of Gath. David had been there before, and he deceived the city’s king, Achish, by pretending to be insane, thereby keeping the Philistines from killing him (21:10–15). This time, David did not have to feign insanity. Achish would have heard of Saul’s war with David, so he probably felt secure in allowing him into the city. This enemy of his enemy—Israel’s King Saul—could be counted on as a friend. Achish gave the country town of Ziklag to David, and it became a royal possession after David ascended the throne (27:5–7).
ellauri155.html on line 523: Little in the narrative tells us what we are to think of David’s actions. Perhaps the very fact that he sought security among the Philistines is enough to make his choice questionable. After all, God had shown Himself able to keep David safe within the boundaries of Israel (chs. 18–26), so David’s seeking refuge in Philistia may indicate a lapse of faith. It could be that David’s raids from Ziklag confirm this. We see how David would go out against enemies of Israel such as the Amalekites (see Ex. 17:8–16) who were in the south of Judah. After defeating them, he would bring spoil back to Achish and lie to the king, telling him that he was conducting raids on the Israelites (1 Sam. 27:8–12). We do not want to make too much of this, for some actions are acceptable in times of war that are not necessarily acceptable in times of peace (for example, industrial espionage). This was a time of war, with both Achish and the peoples David raided being actual enemies of Israel. Still, David’s successful deception put him in a quandary. Achish was so pleased with David’s work that he commissioned David to join him against Israel (28:1–2). What would he do?
ellauri155.html on line 525: It is hard to know how to evaluate David’s actions in today’s passage. If they were sinful, let us note that David still accomplished good for Israel by defeating so many of the nation’s enemies. Sometimes we put ourselves in certain difficult situations because of our sin, but that does not mean God cannot bring about good from it. We should not use that as an excuse for sin, but we must also remember that the Lord is big enough to take advantage of our mistakes. Stalin made some mistakes but he did electrify the country as promised by prophet Lenin.
ellauri155.html on line 543: Eipä ihme että Davidin moabilaisuus äidin puolelta on vähän noloa. Laittomasti viritettyjä sählämeitä Jordanin itärannalta.
ellauri155.html on line 694: Porukat on sitä mieltä että pulskan David Humen panos vapaaseen tahtokeskusteluun on ihan parhautta "compatibilistisen" kannan puolesta, eli että apinan vapaus ja moraalinen vastuu sopii yhteen determinismin kanssa. Tää aihe on musta aina ollut aivan tarpeetonta länkytystä, totta kai se sopii. Tällä lailla se apinoiden kexi murenee, ei siinä mitään, apinat hoitaa nää hommat länkytyxellä. Apinat paukuttavat symbaaleja ja läxyttävät toisiaan, se on niiden tapa tyhjentää vieteri.
ellauri155.html on line 856: Donald Davidson (1999)
ellauri156.html on line 34:
ellauri156.html on line 45: But here is the spoiler: What David's story tells us is that it is OK to be as awful and nasty a person privately as you could ever wish to be, as long as you end up as the overall winner of the cup. Winners can do nothing seriously wrong, because the victory at the end is the crucial thing. In terms of good old game theory: a virtuous life is no game of attrition, where every mistake counts and your deeds are toted up at the end. No, it is a winner takes all, you either win or lose at the end, whatever happens in subgames on the way is just wiped away. This applies to Dog himself, as Lauri Snellman with his nifty jesuitical game-theoretical theodicy argument has shown.
ellauri156.html on line 59:

9. David and Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11:1-4)

ellauri156.html on line 68: Many tragic incidents occur as the unexpected outcome of a sequence of events. Certainly that is the case with King David. A little vacation from war leads to a day spent in bed, followed by a stroll along the roof of his palace as night begins to fall on Jerusalem. By chance, David sees a woman bathing herself, a sight which David fixes upon, his pecker coming instantly to attention, and then follows up on with an investigation as to her identity. The woman is shortly summoned to the palace and then to his bedroom, where David sleeps with her (well no, actually he spends time with her very much awake; what is meant by this euphemism is that he fucks the lady crazy.) Even though he has discovered she is the wife of Uriah, a warrior who is fighting for the army of Israel. Never mind. The woman becomes pregnant, and so David calls Uriah home, hoping it will be thought that he has gotten his wife pregnant. When this does not work, David gives orders to Joab, the commander of the army, which arranges for Uriah's death in battle. It looks like the perfect crime, but David's sin is discovered and dealt with by Nathan, the prophet of God. Nathan is Philip Roth's alter ego's name, Nathan Zuckerman! Can this be an accident? Jehova knows, it's too late to ask Phil.
ellauri156.html on line 70: This sequence of events and its accompanying tragedies is the subject of chapters 11 and 12 of 2 Samuel. I have chosen to expound these chapters in three lessons. This first lesson will deal with “David and Bathsheba,” as described in 11:1-4. In the following lesson, we will address the subject of “David and Uriah,” as told by our author in 11:5-27. The third lesson will focus on “David and Nathan,” as this confrontation is put forth in chapter 12. Our text has much to say about the sins of adultery and murder, but rest assured that it addresses much more sins than this. It is a text we all need to hear and to heed, for if a “man after God's own heart” can fall so quickly and so far, surely we are capable of similar or even bigger failures. May the Spirit of God take this portion of the Word of God and illuminate it to each of us in full color, as we come to this study.
ellauri156.html on line 72: The best part in my opinion is the bit in Talmud where David looks Bathsheba in the eyes and sees his own horny face reflected there and is sick of the whole thing. From then on he will not touch Bathseba anymore down there ever again and leaves her to languish in his harem bored as hell. Maybe David barfed because Bathsheba was already corked. He was used to virgins.
ellauri156.html on line 74: Before we begin to look carefully at verses 1-4 of chapter 11, allow me to make a couple of comments about this event as portrayed in these two chapters of 2 Samuel. First, I want you to notice the “law of proportion” in this text. Only three verses describe David's sin of adultery with Bathsheba. Second, the author pulls no punches in describing the wickedness of this sin. History is not written in a way that makes David look good. Third, the sin of David and Bathsheba is dealt with historically, but not in a Hollywood fashion. Hollywood filmmakers would perform a remake of this account to dwell on the sensual elements. Nothing in this text is intended to inspire unclean thoughts or actions. Indeed, this story is written in a way that causes us to shudder at the thought of such things. I know it is something of a letdown, but at least myself, I was totally capable of imagining the rest. (I got 5 streetwalking girls and a wife, for God's sake.) If you need help with unclean thoughts here, please consult Gonorrhé Ballsack's Comtes Droolatiques.
ellauri156.html on line 76: Israel is at war with none other than the Ammonites (verse 1), which may come as a surprise to you as it did to me. (Well, to be honest, I thought they were the cretacean mollusks by the same name.) I thought the Ammonites had been defeated in chapter 10. I was wrong. The author is very clear on this matter. In chapter 8, the author tells how David began to engage his enemies in battle, ending the strangle-hold these surrounding nations had on Israel. David subjected the Philistines (8:1), then the Moabites (8:2), and then he took on the king of Zobah (8:3ff.). In the process, other nations became involved and found Israel too formidable an enemy to oppose again. (Notice the similarity of the situation here to the Yom Kippur War.)
ellauri156.html on line 78: In chapter 10, we find David and the men of Israel deliberately insulted by Hanun, the king of the Ammonites. David had become friends with Nahash, the former king. When he died, David sent a delegation of officials to express David's respect for Nahash and his grief over this king's death. The Ammonites do not seem to wish to continue this peaceful relationship with David and Israel, so they humiliate the men whom David sent. This is how it all happened (Bob omitted this):
ellauri156.html on line 80: When David’s men came to the land of the Ammonites, 3 the Ammonite commanders said to Hanun their lord, “Do you think David is honoring your father by sending envoys to you to express sympathy? Hasn’t David sent them to you only to explore the city and spy it out and overthrow it?” 4 So Hanun seized David’s envoys, shaved off half of each man’s beard, cut off their garments at the buttocks, and sent them away.
ellauri156.html on line 81: 5 When David was told about this, he sent messengers to meet the men, for they were greatly humiliated. The king said, “Stay at Jericho till your beards have grown, and then come back.”
ellauri156.html on line 83: David didn't want to see bare-butted men with just half a beard.
ellauri156.html on line 84: This leads to a war between the Israelites and the Ammonites. The Ammonites recruit the Syrians as their allies against David. In their first conflict, the Syrians flee, forcing the Ammonites to retreat to “the city” (10:14; which must be Rabbah -- see 12:26ff.). The Syrians are not content with their defeat and attempt a rematch, but once again they are defeated. This causes them to give up any thought of backing up the Ammonites in their war with Israel in the future.
ellauri156.html on line 86: So you see, the Ammonites were not subjected to Israel in chapter 10, but they were deprived of Syrian assistance. Now they are on their own. The Israelites make the most of this. They ravage the land of the Ammonites and then besiege the capital (royal) city of Rabbah (11:1; see 1 Chronicles 20:1). This city of Rabbah, incidentally, is now the city of Amman, Jordan. It is not until after David's sin is rebuked by Nathan that the Israelites actually take the city (2 Samuel 12:26-31).
ellauri156.html on line 90: Every man who is able to fight goes to war, except one -- David. David, we are told, “stayed in Jerusalem” (11:1). David's decision to stay at home in Jerusalem becomes a devastating one. The author of Samuel does not include this fact, but the Chronicler does. In 1 Chronicles 20, we read these words:
ellauri156.html on line 92: 1 Then it happened in the spring, at the time when kings go out to battle, that Joab led out the army and ravaged the land of the sons of Ammon, and came and besieged Rabbah. But David stayed at Jerusalem. And Joab struck Rabbah and overthrew it (1 Chronicles 20:1).
ellauri156.html on line 94: We know from the details of this text in Chronicles that it is the same time and the same war. This decision on David's part precedes a serious sin of another kind in 1 Chronicles 21:
ellauri156.html on line 96: 1 Then Satan stood up against Israel and moved David to number Israel. 2 So David said to Joab and to the princes of the people, “Go, number Israel from Beersheba even to Dan, and bring me word that I may know their number.” 3 Joab said, “May the LORD add to His people a hundred times as many as they are! But, my lord the king, are they not all my lord's servants? Why does my lord seek this thing? Why should he be a cause of guilt to Israel?” 4 Nevertheless, the king's word prevailed against Joab. Therefore, Joab departed and went throughout all Israel, and came to Jerusalem. 5 Joab gave the number of the census of all the people to David. And all Israel were 1,100,000 men who drew the sword; and Judah was 470,000 men who drew the sword (1 Chronicles 21:1-5).
ellauri156.html on line 98: Joab urges David not to number the Israelites, and through the prophet Egad, God rebukes David for doing so, giving him a choice of one of three chastenings. It is a grave sin with great consequences for the nation Israel. Out of this sin, God brings about blessing for Israel, because it is on the plot of ground where David offers sacrifices to God that the temple will be built. What chastenings?
ellauri156.html on line 100: 9 The Lord said to Egad, David’s seer, 10 “Go and tell David, ‘This is what the Lord says: I am giving you three options. Choose one of them for me to carry out against you.’” 11 So Gad went to David and said to him, “This is what the Lord says: ‘Take your choice: 12 three years of famine, three months of being swept away[a] before your enemies, with their swords overtaking you, or three days of the sword of the Lord—days of plague in the land, with the angel of the Lord ravaging every part of Israel.’ Now then, decide how I should answer the one who sent me.”
ellauri156.html on line 102: 13 David said to Egad, “Hmm. I am in deep distress. Let me fall into the hands of the Lord, for his mercy is very great; but do not let me fall into human hands, that's too humiliating.”
ellauri156.html on line 106: But why the fuck was it a sin in the first place? Censuses are taxation events. David was after money, not blood, since when is that a sin in Jehovah's book? Or maybe he did not want to draw the sword, but rather sheathe it with Bathsheba? Now that is a sin, if the vagina is not one of yours. Hey, read on, Bob explains it all:
ellauri156.html on line 108: What I am pointing out here is that the decision on David's part -- to remain in Jerusalem -- is the beginning of woes for both David and the nation Israel. Why is it wrong for David to stay home while the rest of the men of Israel go to war against the Ammonites? First, leading the nation in war is one of the main tasks of the king:
ellauri156.html on line 116: Saul shrunk back from pursuing the enemies of Israel at times, and it was sometimes David who stood in Saul's shoes, leading the nation in battle. This was the case, for example, when David fought Goliath, a battle that should have been fought by Saul, Israel's giant (see 1 Samuel 9:2). Up until now, David has been leading his men in battle, but in chapter 11, David suddenly steps back, sending others to fight for him. In 2 Samuel 12:26-31, the author makes it clear that David may not have been planning to be present for the formal surrender of Rabbah. Joab sends David a message, urging him to come and at least give the appearance of leading his army. If David does not come, Joab warns, David will not receive the glory, and it may go to Joab. Joab knows that David knows this is not the way it was meant to be. And so it is that David makes a formal appearance to be the “official” leader at the time of the surrender of the city of Rabbah.
ellauri156.html on line 118: So the sin was not to bask in reflected glory. David is wrong in yet another way, a way he would hardly have realized at the time. David is a prototype of the Messiah who was yet to come as God's King. When Messiah comes, it is He who brings about the deliverance of His people. It is He who will come to subdue His enemies and to establish His throne. How can David represent Messiah as he reigns by staying at home and refusing to enter the battle with the enemies of God and the enemies of God's people? Messiah will come (the second time) as a mighty warrior. If David would portray Him, then he must be a mighty warrior.
ellauri156.html on line 120: What the fuck? Jesus was a wimp par excellence, so precisely by NOT taking part in a war David was a perfect role model for this pacifist.
ellauri156.html on line 122: What keeps David home in Jerusalem? Why doesn’t David go to the battle? I fear there are perhaps several reasons. The first is David's arrogance. God has been with David in all of his military encounters and given him victory over all his foes. God has given David a great name. David has begun to believe his own press clippings. He begins to feel he is invincible. David seems to have come to the place where he believes his abilities are so great he can lead Israel into victory, even though he is not with his men in battle. He was just getting bored. God should not have helped him TOO much, that was like taking the wind from his sails. Any parent knows that much.
ellauri156.html on line 124: This seems consistent with David's other great sin, which also follows his decision to stay at home. When David instructs Joab to number the Israelite warriors, Joab protests. This is something David should not do. Perhaps this is because David would find too much confidence in the number of his men, rather than in God. It certainly is a far cry from Gideon's army, pared down to a meager 300 men.
ellauri156.html on line 209: A second reason may be boredom. Something you my dear remaining readers know by now. It is one thing to fight battles in which the enemy is quickly overcome. But the besieging of Rabbah is a whole different kind of war. This battle will not be won so quickly. It will take time to starve the Ammonites to the point that they surrender. It is not a very exciting kind of war to wage. And while they wait, the Israelite soldiers (which includes David) have to pitch their tents outside the city, living in the open field. This is no picnic, and David knows it. David's attitude seems reflected in the advertising slogan of a major hamburger chain, “You deserve a break today.”
ellauri156.html on line 211: A third reason -- and I am hesitant to suggest it -- is that David may be getting soft. Let's face it, David had some very difficult days when he was fleeing from Saul. I am sure there were hot days and cold nights. There were certainly days when his food was either limited or lousy, or both. Army food has never been known as a work of culinary artistry. Now, David has moved up in the world, from barren wilderness, which Saul and his army would avoid if possible, to the hills of Jerusalem. His accommodations are better, too. He no longer lives in a tent (if he was fortunate enough to have one in those days); he lives in a palace. Why would David want to stay in a tent in the open field, outside of Rabbah, if he can stay in his own bed (or Bathsheba's), in his own palace, inside Jerusalem?37
ellauri156.html on line 213: David is starting to become Saul-like, in that he is willing to let others go out and fight his battles for him. Among those David is willing to send in his place are Joab and Abishai. This Joab, we should recall, is a violent man. Joab was not the commander of the army of Israel by David's choice. David had distanced himself from Joab and Abishai because of the death of li'l Abner (2 Samuel 3:26-30). Joab had become the commander of Israel's armed forces because he was the first to accept David's challenge to attack Jebus (1 Chronicles 11:4-6). Suddenly, David is willing to stay at home and leave the whole of Israel's armed forces under Joab's command. I do not think David is motivated by trust in Joab as much as he is his disdain for the hardship of the campaign to take Rabbah.
ellauri156.html on line 215: Like my uncle to whom I referred earlier, David is in the wrong place at the wrong time. He is in Jerusalem when he should be at Rabbah. Unlike my uncle, David is in the wrong place at the wrong time because of a wrong decision. David is like the simpleton in Proverbs 7, who was foolishly and yet deliberately in the wrong place at the wrong time. Something almost had to go wrong, and it surely did!
ellauri156.html on line 236: King David makes the mistake of staying in Jerusalem, rather than fighting the Ammonites with his army. He does not stay home to meditate on the Law of Moses or to write another psalm or two; he seems to stay home to stay in bed. We know Uriah went to bed when it was evening (that is, when it got dark), and it is very likely that he got up at first light (see 11:13). With David, it is very different. David does not get up until evening, that is, until it is time for a soldier to go to bed. (As a friend of mine pointed out, this is probably a habit developed over days and not just a one-time event.) It is very unlikely that David is doing any “kingly work” in the wee hours of the night. From all appearances, David is simply indulging himself. Whaddya mean? Fucking maidens is kingly work if anything. Surely he wasn't watching late night shows, since all he had was his TV mama. Sitting up and adjusting the screen until the picture was completely right.
ellauri156.html on line 267: Finally, David can stand his bed no longer. Getting up, he goes for a stroll around the roof of his palace. Most certainly, David's palace was built on the highest ground possible, so that it would afford him a commanding view of the city and the surrounding country. Virtually every other residence and building would be below David's penthouse apartment, and thus he would be able to see much that was out of sight for others. (A friend remarked after this message that a truck driver had told him a whole lot can be seen from an 18-wheeler that people in cars don't see. A chicano truck-driver just got a 110 year sentence in the U.S. for failing to stop his 18-wheeler when the brakes went. Now that was a honest-to-god Jehova style sentence, to the third and fourth generation. Good work, Rocky!)
ellauri156.html on line 269: I am not suggesting that David purposed to see something he should not. (I bet he did, peeping Tom. You actually come round to the same conclusion below, Bob.) More than likely he is walking about, almost absent-mindedly, when suddenly his eyes fix on something that rivets his attention on a woman bathing herself. The text does not really tell us where this woman is bathing, and why at this time of the night? We only know that she is within sight of David's penthouse (rooftop). David notes her beauty. He does not know who she is or whether she is married. We cannot be certain how much David sees, and thus we do not know for certain whether he has yet sinned. (What the fuck? How much do you need to see to sin? Are boobs enough, or do you need to see the pudendum or the fanny?) If David saw more of this woman than he should (a fact still in question), then he surely should have diverted his eyes. It was not necessarily evil for him to discretely inquire about her. If she were unmarried and eligible, he could have taken her for his wife. His inquiry would make this clear.
ellauri156.html on line 271: Word comes back to David about this woman's identity:
ellauri156.html on line 275: The answer comes to David in the form of a question. I take it that no one else actually saw this woman, but only David. The identification of this woman depends then upon David's description of her age, appearance, and location, and no one could be absolutely certain whether this is the woman or not -- except for David, of course, who would recognize her.
ellauri156.html on line 277: Uriah Heep sai nimensä samannimisestä saiturista, joka esiintyy Charles Dickensin teoxessa David Copperfield. Mulla on se, Seija luki sen ja on siitä lähin ahdistellut mua lukemaan sen myös. Eipä ole napannut. Siinä oli sellai huilisti, joka nosti polvea soittaessaan poikkihuilua jotensakin rivosti.
ellauri156.html on line 279: Uriah Heep on brittiläinen progressiivinen hard rock -yhtye, joka perustettiin Lontoossa vuonna 1970 ja on edelleen aktiivinen. Nimensä yhtye otti Charles Dickensin romaanissa David Copperfield esiintyvästä samannimisestä viekkaasta ja vastenmielisestä kirjanpitäjästä. Yhtyeen tunnetuimpiin kappaleisiin kuuluvat muun muassa "Easy Livin'", "Lady in Black", "Gypsy", "July Morning" ja "Look at Yourself". Suurinta suosiota se nautti 1970-luvun ensimmäisellä puoliskolla.
ellauri156.html on line 283: The information David receives should be sufficient for him to end the matter, or more appropriately, to start it. If this woman is married, he has no business going any further. No matter how great his position and power, nothing gives him the right to take another man's wife. The pattern for David's actions is clearly outlined by Joseph, who was hotly pursued by his master's wife (but the shoe was on the other foot that time, a puma hunting for a young rattlesnake. And Joseph was a bachelor, so what was the sin in that?).
ellauri156.html on line 287: The report David is given concerning Bathsheba gives him all the information he needs, and more, if he is intent upon doing what is right. He knows Bathsheba is married and thus out of the question. He also knows Bathsheba is married to Uriah the Hittite. This is no nameless husband, someone David has never heard of before. David has to know Uriah, even if he does not know his wife. In 2 Samuel 23:39, “Uriah the Hittite” is named as one of David's mighty men, known for his bravery and courage as a soldier. If he does not know it, surely someone there among his servants would inform him.
ellauri156.html on line 289: My fear is that David chose to ignore Uriah's military record and to fix his attention upon his racial origins. It is obvious and noteworthy that David refers to Uriah as “Uriah the Hittite,” while the author of Samuel refers to him only as “Uriah.” The expression, “Uriah the Hittite” is a term of derision, I believe, based solely upon the fact that he is of Hittite stock. Never mind that David has Moabite blood in his veins.
ellauri156.html on line 293: Let us briefly review the place of the Hittites in Old Testament history. As early as Genesis 15:18-21, God promised Abram (Abraham) that his descendants would inherit the land of the Hittites (along with that of other peoples as well; see also Exodus 3:8, 17; 13:5; 23:23, 28, 32; 33:21; 34:11; Deuteronomy 7:1; Joshua 1:4; 3:10). Ephron, the man from whom Abraham bought a burial plot for his family, was a Hittite (see Genesis 23:10; 25:9; etc.). Jacob's brother Esau married several Hittite wives (Genesis 26:34-35; 36:2). The Israelites were commanded to utterly destroy the Hittites (Deuteronomy 20:17). The Hittites opposed Israel's entrance into the promised land (see Numbers 13:29; Joshua 9:1: 11;1-5), and the Israelites had some victories over them (Joshua 24;11). Nevertheless, they did not totally remove them and came to live among them (Judges 3:5). When David was fleeing from Saul, he learned that the king was camped nearby. He asked two of his men who would go with him to Saul's camp. One of the two, Abishai, volunteered to go with David, the other man did not. This man was Ahimelech, the Hittite (1 Samuel 26:6). (Eli siis mitä? Pitäskö tästä päätellä nyt jotakin heettien statuxesta vai? Oliko ne jotain neekereitä?)
ellauri156.html on line 295: It is obvious that Uriah had forsaken his own people and their gods to live in Israel, marry an Israelite woman, and fight in David's army. He is no pagan, to be put to death. He is a proselyte. In spite of all this, I believe David looks down upon him. David has grown accustomed to having the finest of everything. His palace is the finest around. His furnishings, his food, his help, are all the finest. Now, he looks from his penthouse and sees a woman whom he regards as “fine.” How can a woman so “fine” belong to this Hittite? She is fit for a king. And this king intends to have her.
ellauri156.html on line 297: And so David sends messengers to her, who take her and bring her to him. When she arrives, David sleeps with her, and when she is purified from her uncleanness,38 she returns to her house. That is that. (Mikä uncleanliness? Meneekö Bathsheba Joen Bideniin ja pesee Taavin runkut pois?) If she had not become pregnant, I have little doubt she would never have darkened the door of David's house again. David does not seek a wife in Bathsheba. He does not even seek an affair. He wants one night of sex with this woman, and then he will let Uriah have her. (Häh? Oliko Bathsheba niin huono hoito vai? Eikös sitä olis voinut toistamiseenkin rotkauttaa? Bathshebalta ei nähtävästi mitään kysytty missään vaiheessa. Eikun x-asentoon Taavin sängylle ja melaa mekkoon.)
ellauri156.html on line 299: The sequence of events, so far as David is concerned, can be enumerated in this way: (1) David stays in Jerusalem; (2) David stays in bed; (3) David sees Bathsheba bathing herself as he walks on his roof; (4) David sends and inquires about this woman; (5) David learns her identity and that she is married to a military hero; (6) David sends messengers to take her and bring her to him; (7) David lays with her; (8) Bathsheba goes back to her home after she purifies herself. This same sequence can be seen in a number of other texts, none of which is commendable. Shechem “saw, took, and lay with” Dinah, the daughter of Jacob in Genesis 34:2. Judah “saw, took, and went in to” the Canaanite woman he made his wife in Genesis 38:2-3. Achan “saw, coveted, and took” the forbidden spoils of war in Joshua 7:21. Samson did virtually the same in Judges 14. Let us not forget that a similar sequence occurred at the first sin when Eve “saw, desired, and took” the forbidden fruit in Genesis 3. (Thanx a lot Bob for this compendium. This will certainly come handy later on, when looking for something fun to read.)
ellauri156.html on line 301: It is clear from the words of our text that David sinned. It is clear from the actions of David which follow that he sinned. It is clear from the words of God through Nathan that David sinned in a grievous manner. The problem is that many wish to view the text in a way that forces Bathsheba to share David's guilt by assuming that she somehow seduced him. I would like to pursue this matter, because I believe there is absolutely no evidence to support such a conclusion. (Wow! That's a refreshing point of view! Like Ballsack's novel Comment la belle Fille de Portillon quinaulda son iuge.)
ellauri156.html on line 303: The inference is often drawn that Bathsheba should not have been exposing herself as she did, and that it was her indiscretion which started this whole sequence of events. Some think her actions may have been deliberate (She knew David was there and could see. . . .), while others would be more gracious and assume it was simply poor judgment. Let me point out several things from the text. First and foremost, when Nathan pronounces divine judgment upon David for his sin, Bathsheba and Uriah are depicted as the victims, not the villains. When Adam and Eve sinned, God specifically indicted Adam, Eve, and the serpent, and each received their just curse. This is simply not the case with Bathsheba. Nowhere in the Bible is she indicted for this sin. It may be that the author did not choose to focus upon Bathsheba, but even in this case, the Law would clearly require us to consider her innocent until proven guilty. (Which law? Not biblical law for sure, take for instance Susan's case, where Daniel had to called upon to prove her innocence.)
ellauri156.html on line 305: It is very clear in Samuel that the tragedies which take place in David's household are the consequence of his sin, just as Nathan indicates (12:10-12). Thus, when Amnon rapes Tamar, the sister of Absalom, it is a case of the “chickens coming home to roost.” Or is it a case of "Rooster coming into the chicks?" Note that it is at David's command or summons that Tamar is called to the palace, and then to Amnon's bedside. There is not so much as a hint that when Tamar is raped, it is all of Amnon's doing. Should this not strongly indicate that the same is true in Bathsheba's case, of which this second incident is a kind of mirror image? (Fucking crooky noses, raping and ravaging their kinky haired ladies right and left.)
ellauri156.html on line 307: When we read of this incident, we do so through Western eyes. We live in a day when a woman has the legal right to say “No” at any point in a romantic relationship. If the man refuses to stop, that is regarded as a violation of her rights; it is regarded as rape. It didn't work that way for women in the ancient Near East. Lot could offer his virgin daughters to the wicked men of Sodom, to protect strangers who were his guests, and there was not one word of protest from his daughters when he did so (Genesis 19:7-8). Even less later, when they asked their father Lot to fuck them at will. These virgins were expected to obey their father, who was in authority over them. Michal was first given to David as his wife, and then Saul took her back and gave her to another man. And then David took her back (1 Samuel 25:44; 2 Samuel 3:13-16). Apparently Michal had no say in this whole sequence of events. Oh, those days of innocence!
ellauri156.html on line 311: Now, having looked at the big picture, let's concentrate on the juicy details. The text informs us that David sees this woman bathing and notes that she is very beautiful. It is sometimes thought that David saw Bathsheba unclothed as she bathed herself publicly, and that the sight of her (unclothed/partially) body prompted David to act as he did. Virtually the identical words employed in our text (“very beautiful in appearance”) are found in Genesis 24:16 of Rebekah, as she came to the well with a water jug on her shoulder. She was neither naked nor partially clothed. Similar (though not identical) descriptions are found, where no exposure of the woman is indicated at all (see Genesis 12:11; 26:7; 29:17; Esther 1:1). I believe one of the reasons David summons Bathsheba to his palace is that he has not seen all that he wishes. (Haahaa! Bob, you are a little too bashful here. Most likely he wants to try on what he saw, like St. Thomas who wanted to put his finger in the wound. Seeing is not believing.)
ellauri156.html on line 313: Let's pursue this matter a little more. (Oh lord, I feel the spirit stirring below my belt.) Bathsheba is bathing herself. (This is about the 4. time Bob invites us to picture this tender moment. There are not too many of them in the Bible, so let us savor it.) We tend to assume that this means she is disrobed, at least partially. I believe Bathsheba is bathing herself in some place normally used for such purposes. Only David, with his penthouse vantage, would be able to see her, and a whole lot of other folks if he chose. The poor do not have the same privacy privileges as the rich. I have seen any number of people bathing themselves on the sidewalks of India, because this is their home. The word for bathing employed here is often used to describe the washing of a guest's hands or feet and for the ceremonial washings of the priests. Abigail used this term when she spoke of washing the feet of David's servants (1 Samuel 25:41). Such washings could be done, with decency, without total privacy. We assume far too much if we assume Abigail is walking about unclothed, in full sight of onlookers.
ellauri156.html on line 317: 1 Then it happened in the spring, at the time when kings go out to battle, that David sent Joab and his servants with him and all Israel, and they destroyed the sons of Ammon and besieged Rabbah. But David stayed at Jerusalem (emphases mine).
ellauri156.html on line 319: It is not as if Bathsheba is acting in an unbecoming manner, knowing that men are around. She has every right to assume they are not. David is around, but he should not be. On top of this, she is not bathing herself at high noon; she is bathing herself in the evening. This is when the law prescribed (for ceremonial cleansing), and it is when the sun is setting. In other words, it is nearly dark when Bathsheba sets out to wash herself. David has to crane his neck and use his binoculars to see what he does. I believe Bathsheba makes every effort to assure her modesty, but the king's vantage point is too high, and he is looking with too much zeal. I am suggesting that David is much more of a peeping Tom than Bathsheba is an exhibitionist. I believe the text bears me out on this.
ellauri156.html on line 321: If I am right in what I have been saying, David's sin becomes that much more wicked. In some instances (if not most), a woman may purposely or unwittingly encourage the one who assaults her. In this case, there is not so much as a hint that this takes place. In fact, if I am reading the story accurately, David's “sighting” of Bathsheba is the result of her keeping the law, while David is failing his responsibilities as king. But not his duties as the king of the apes.
ellauri156.html on line 325: First, the root of David's sin is not low self-esteem; it is arrogance. (Since when is low self-esteem a sin? Well I bet it is for American believers. Think of Bill James' Will to Believe.) I am getting quite weary of hearing that the root of all evils is low self-esteem. I wonder why we see nothing of this in the Bible. David's problem is just the opposite. He has become puffed up and arrogant because of his success and status as Israel's king. He has come to see himself as different/better than the rest of the Israelites. They need to go to war; he does not. They need to sleep in the open field; he needs to get his rest in his own bed, in his palace. They can have a wife; he can have whatever woman he wants.
ellauri156.html on line 327: Second, the nature of David's sin is the abuse of power. Power corrupts, we are told, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. David has come to power. In the previous chapters, David employed his God-given power to defeat the enemies of God and of Israel. He used his power as Israel's king to fill his pockets and void his cullions, and takes advantage of Dog's promise to Saul by restoring to Mephibosheth his family property and by making him a son at his table. Now, David, drunk with his power, uses it to indulge himself at the expense of others. I want you to notice the repetition of the word “send” or “sent” in this chapter. It is a king like David who can send all the men to war but stay home himself (verse 1). It is a king like David who can send people to inquire about Bathsheba, and then to send messengers to “take” her and bring her to his palace (verses 3-4). It is a king like David who can “send” for Uriah and “send” orders to Joab to have him killed. It is a king who "sends" his shlong into Bathsheba's holiest of the holy. David has the power, and he certainly knows how to use it, only now he is using that power for his own benefit, at the expense of others. This is not servant leadership.
ellauri156.html on line 329: Sexual abuse and sexual harassment are just two of the ways people abuse their power. Parents begin to think they own their children, and that they can use their children to satisfy themselves, so they engage in various forms of abuse, often sexual in nature. Bosses get used to being in control and telling people what to do, and it should not be surprising to learn that they sometimes abuse their power over employees and subordinates to sexually satisfy themselves. This sin is no different from that of David. (Oh, oh, this is too good, my cup runneth over.)
ellauri156.html on line 331: I must press the point a little further, at the risk of coming off. Of course it is wrong for David to use his power to have sex with another man's wife. But it is not right to abuse power even when sex is permissible. A husband should not abuse his power in order to have sex with his wife. And a wife should not abuse her power (of saying “No,” for example) to punish or put off her husband. (LOL! Bob, you show you true colors here!) Within marriage, sex is simply another area of serving our mate. It is not the opportunity to lord it over our mate. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Jennifer! And you girls as well!
ellauri156.html on line 333: Third, prosperity is as dangerous -- and sometimes more dangerous -- than poverty and adversity. We all get weary of the adversities of life. We all yearn for the time when we can kick back and put up our feet and relax a bit. We all tire of agonizing over the bills and not having quite enough money to go around. David certainly looked forward to the time when he could stop fleecing Saul and begin to reign as king. But let me point out that from a spiritual point of view, David never did better than he did in adversity and weakness. (In fact, he was quite like Ballsack's ung paouvre qui avait nom le Vieulx-par-chemins, another Iivana Nyhtänköljä.)
ellauri156.html on line 335: Conversely, David never did worse than he did in prosperity and power. How many psalms do you think David wrote from his palatial bed and from his penthouse? How much meditation on the law took place while David was in Jerusalem, rather than on the battlefield? On the other hand, how many maidens did he open the psalmbook with on the field? We are not to be masochists, wanting more and more suffering, but on the other hand we should recognize that success is often a greater test than adversity. Often when it appears “everything's goin' my way” we are in the greatest danger of producing some shit like Frank Sinatra's "My Way".
ellauri156.html on line 343: David's sin did not just suddenly appear in a moment of time. David set himself up for this fall. We know he disengaged himself from the battle, choosing instead a life of comfort and ease. You and I may make the same decision, though in a slightly different way. We may choose to ease up in our pursuit of becoming a disciple of our Lord, of the disciplined life which causes us to bring our bodies under our control (see 1 Corinthians 9:24-27).
ellauri156.html on line 347: Sins of commission are often the result of sins of omission. David committed sin by his adultery with Bathsheba and later by the murder of her husband, but these sins were borne out of David's omissions which came to pass when he stayed home, rather than go to war. These sins of omission are often difficult to recognize in ourselves or others, but they are there. And after a while, they incline us to more open sins, as we see in David.
ellauri156.html on line 349: Within those of you who are reading this message, I know there are some who have already fallen in the same hole as David. You have already committed adultery. To you, I would say: “Stop now!” How much better it would have been if David had confessed to his sin with Bathsheba before he went on to murder Uriah. Sin is like a cancer: the sooner it is cut out, the better; the longer it is left, the more it grows. If you have fallen as David did (or in some other way), forsake your sin, confess it, find God's forgiveness, and move on to the next.
ellauri156.html on line 351: Some of you have not yet sinned as David did, but I hope I have given you some ideas, and that you are already on your way. You are like David when he chose to stay in Jerusalem, and when he chose to stay in bed. You have not yet managed to sin in a dramatic fashion, but you are laying the groundwork for it. It's only a matter of time and opportunity, so keep hacking. My question to you is not whether you are actively committing sin, but if you are, please send me some snapshots.
ellauri156.html on line 353: Whether you are actively committed to Christ, serving Him as you serve others, using the power (spiritual gifts) God has given you to benefit others? Let us learn from David's omissions, rather than learn (experientially) from his commissions.
ellauri156.html on line 363: I don’t think I’m exaggerating here. The interaction between David and Uriah (see next episode) seems to indicate that David was puzzled as to why Uriah would not enjoy the good life in Jerusalem if he had the opportunity to do so. Uriah, on the other hand, chose to live as he would have on the battlefield.
ellauri156.html on line 365: This reference to Bathsheba’s “purification” is interesting and perplexing. The King James Version reads, “and he lay with her; for she was purified from her uncleanness: and she returned unto her house” at verse 4. The New King James Version is slightly different: “and he lay with her, for she was cleansed from her impurity; and she returned to her house” (note the change from a semi-colon to a comma, and from a colon to a semi-colon). The NIV reads, “and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.)” The NRSV reads, “and he lay with her. (Now she was purifying herself after her period. Or was it colon? Only David knows, and Dog of course, but they don't tell.).”
ellauri156.html on line 374: Aika hemmetisti kyyhkypaisteja papille, kun jokainen menstruoiva nainen tuo niitä sille 2kpl/kk. Pappi pysyy hyvin selvillä seurakuntalaisten varmoista päivistä. Hmm. Jos Bathsheban kuukkixet oli ohize jo vähintään viikko sitten, kohtahan sillä oli ovulaatio, eikäpä ihme että Taavi-enon mälli teki heti tehtävänsä. Vaikka mä en kyllä usko eze jäi siihen yhteen kertaan. (2) When did this cleansing occur, and when was it completed? Was Bathsheba’s bathing which David witnessed part of her ceremonial cleansing? If so, there may have had to be a delay before the Law permitted intercourse. Otherwise, David would have caused her to violate the Law pertaining to cleansing, since it may not have been complete. The translations which make her cleansing a past, (continued) completed event seem to be suggesting that she was now legally able to engage in intercourse, though certainly not with David. If she was still in the process of her cleansing, David’s sin of adultery is compounded because it was committed at the wrong time, while cleansing was still in process. It is also possible to read the text (as does the NASB) to say that Bathsheba waited at David’s house until she was ceremonially clean from her evening with David. It is interesting that nothing is said of David waiting until he was cleansed. The inference I take from this “cleansing” reference is that Bathsheba was still concerned about keeping the Law of Moses, even if David was not. Big fat hairy diff.
ellauri156.html on line 376:

10. David and Uriah (2 Samuel 11:5-27)

ellauri156.html on line 380: It was the clumsy attempt to cover up the petty crime which led to Watergate. Richard Nixon, the President of the United States, was forced to resign to avoid impeachment. A number of his closest associates were indicted, convicted, and sentenced to brief prison terms. Not Tricky Dick, of course, he went scot free. Nain on meidankin elamassamme! Ja Daavidin!
ellauri156.html on line 384: Our lesson from 2 Samuel 11 is one of the great cover-up attempts of all time, and like so many, it too fails miserably. Our previous lesson attempted to explain David's sin with Bathsheba in a way that placed the guilt squarely upon David, and not upon Bathsheba. This was all of David's doing, not due to temptation or seduction on Bathsheba's part, but because of arrogance, lust, and greed on David's part.
ellauri156.html on line 386: David had no desire for Bathsheba to become his wife, or even to carry on an adulterous affair with her (a mitigating circumstance). He sought one night's pleasure, and she went home. That was that, or so it seemed. But then David received word from Bathsheba that this one night resulted in Bathsheba's pregnancy. Our text takes up here with the account of David's desperate attempt to cover up his sin with Bathsheba. As we all know, it did not work, and it only made matters worse.
ellauri156.html on line 388: The story of David and Uriah reminds me of the story of the “Sorcerer's Apprentice.” It has been awhile, but as I remember the plot (probably the Walt Disney version), the sorcerer goes away, leaving his apprentice behind to do his chores. The apprentice gets the bright idea that the work would be a whole lot easier if he used his master's magical arts so he could sit back and watch other powers at work. The problem was that he didn't know how to stop what he started, and so more and more helpers came on the scene as the apprentice tried to reverse the process. The worst was when Mickey tried to cleave the broom with an axe, and got instead a million of smaller brooms.
ellauri156.html on line 390: At this point in time, David's life is very similar. He begins to stack one sin upon another, certain that each one will somehow wipe out visibility of the previous sin. Instead, his sins only multiply. More and more people become aware of his sin, and a cover up becomes impossible. Many lessons can be learned from this tragic episode of David's life, which if heeded, will help us duplicate them in our lives. May the Spirit of God open our ears and our hearts to listen and learn from David's attempt to cover up his sin with Bathsheba, so that you can avoid some of his mistakes and do a better job.
ellauri156.html on line 392: In our first lesson, we devoted our attention to the first four verses of chapter 11, which depict David's sin of adultery with Bathsheba. Pretty unbelievable that I got a whole four pages out of it. The trick is was to keep repeating the juicy bit about Bathsheba washing herself before (or after) David's load. I sought to demonstrate that this sin was all of David's doing. The author points his accusing finger at David, not Bathsheba. It was not Bathsheba's indiscretion in bathing herself (as I understand this story), for she was simply obeying the ritual of purification outlined in the law. It was David who, by means of his lofty elevation and view, looked inappropriately at Bathsheba, washing herself,violating her privacy. I endeavored to demonstrate that David's sin with Bathsheba was the result of a sequence of wrong decisions and attitudes on David's part. In one sense, being on the path he was, his destination (of adultery, or something like it) was to be expected. His sins of omission finally blossomed and came into full bloom.
ellauri156.html on line 394: One of the tragic aspects of our story is that the sequence of sin in David's life does not end with his adulterous union with Bathsheba. It leads to a deceptive plot to make her husband Uriah appear to be the father of David's child with Bathsheba and culminates in David's murder of Uriah and his marriage to Uriah's wife, Bathsheba. As we take up where we left off in our last lesson, a few more bits of background information are vital to our understanding of this text.
ellauri156.html on line 396: (1) It seems likely that David and Uriah are hardly strangers, but that they know each other, to some degree at least. Uriah is listed among the mighty warriors of David (2 Samuel 23:39; 1 Chronicles 11:41). Some of the “mighty men” came to David early, while he was in the cave of Adullam (1 Samuel 22:1-2), and we suspect that among them were Joab, Abishai, and Asahel, the three brothers who were mighty men (see 2 Samuel 23:18, 24; 1 Chronicles 11:26).39 Others joined David at Ziklag (1 Chronicles 12:1ff.), and still other great warriors joined with David at Hebron (1 Chronicles 12:38-40).40 We do not know when and where Uriah joined with David, but since his military career ends in 2 Samuel 12, his military feats must have been done earlier. It seems very unlikely that David and Uriah are strangers; rather, it would seem these two men know each other from fighting together, and perhaps even from fleecing Saul together, or maybe Uriah had been a dear brother to David like his old Jonathan.
ellauri156.html on line 398: (2) It seems unlikely that Uriah is ignorant of what David has done and of what he is trying to accomplish by calling him home to Jerusalem. Rumors must have been circulating around Jerusalem about David and Bathsheba, and could easily have reached the Israelite army which had besieged Rabbah. Uriah not only refuses to go to his house and sleep with his wife, he sleeps at the doorway of the king's house, in the midst of his servants. He has many witnesses to testify that any child borne by his wife during this time is not his child. It is clear that Uriah understands exactly what David wants him to do (to have sex with his wife), and that he refuses, even when the king virtually orders him to do so. One finds this difficult to explain if Uriah is ignorant of what happened between David and Bathsheba. At least Uriah knows what David is trying to get him to do on this stay in Jerusalem. The implications of all this we will explore later.
ellauri156.html on line 400: (3) Bathsheba is not said to have any part in David's scheme to deceive Uriah or to bring about his death, much less any knowledge of what David is doing. When she informs David that she is pregnant, David takes decisive action, but nowhere are we told that Bathsheba has a part in his schemes. Verse 26 makes it sound as though she learns of Uriah's death after the fact, through normal channels. After all, would David really want his new wife to know he murdered her husband? David acts without Bathsheba's help.
ellauri156.html on line 402: It looks as though Bathsheba never enters David's mind after their encounter described in verses 1-4. It certainly does not seem that David wants to continue the relationship, to carry on an affair, or to marry her. David simply puts this sinful event out of his mind, until a messenger is sent by Bathsheba informing the king that his night of passion has produced a child. Bathsheba informs David that she is pregnant, not that she is afraid she might be. This means that she has missed at least one period and probably another. All in all, several weeks or more have passed. It will not be long before her pregnancy will become obvious to anyone who looks at her. This is David's sin and his responsibility, and so she informs him.
ellauri156.html on line 404: David has two plans, Plan A, and failing that, Plan B. Here he is very like his master, the Dog, who also has very analogous two plans for his proteges: Plan A, take them to his fold if they obey him, and Plan B: throw them to the dogs (the bad hounds of the hell) if they don't.
ellauri156.html on line 408: David's plan A is simple and, at least in his mind, foolproof. In short, David will entice Uriah to think and to act as he himself has done. David does not wish to endure the adversities of the war with Rabbah, and so he goes to Jerusalem, to his home, and to his bed. He does not wish to deny himself, so he takes the wife of another man and sleeps with her. David will give Uriah the same opportunity, except that it will be his own wife he will sleep with. Not as fun, one must admit. After Uriah has sexual relations with Bathsheba, all will conclude that he is the father of the child which has been conceived by David's sinful act. Only one thing is wrong with David's plan: he assumes Uriah is as spiritually apathetic as he, and that he will act to indulge himself, rather than act like a soldier at war and keep his sword in the sheath.
ellauri156.html on line 410: David sends word to Joab, ordering him to send Uriah home to Jerusalem. I take it from the context that Uriah is sent to Jerusalem on the pretext that he is needed to report directly to David on the state of the war. I doubt David wants Uriah to know he has ordered Joab to send him. I am certain David does not want Uriah to know the real purpose of his journey to Jerusalem. David is orchestrating this homecoming to appear as though it serves one purpose, while it actually serves David's purpose of concealing his own sin. Even at this level, the order for Uriah to return home has a bad odor. You may remember that when David's father wanted to know how the battle with the Philistines was going (three of his sons were involved), he sent David, the youngest son, as an errand boy to take some supplies and return with word about the war (1 Samuel 17:17-19). One does not need to send a military hero as a messenger (nor is it good practice, the youngest son is more expendable.).
ellauri156.html on line 412: I should also add that Joab is already being drawn into the conspiracy. Joab obeys David's command to send Uriah, and my guess is that Joab knows something is up. He may even have heard about David's liaison with Bathsheba. When he sends Uriah to Jerusalem, he has to give him some mission, some task to perform. Joab and Uriah may have sensed that this was no “mission impossible” (as you would give a mighty warrior), but that is a “mission incredible.” In any case, the web of deceit and deception is already being woven, and more people are being drawn into the conspiracy. Wow, this is prime material for a soap opera. Maybe there already is one, must check. OF COURSE there is:
ellauri156.html on line 415: David and Bathsheba is a 1951 historical Technicolor epic film about King David made by 20th Century Fox. It was directed by King Saul, produced by Dog, a.k.a. Zanuck, from a screenplay by Philip Dunno. The cinematography was by Leon Shameonyou. Gregory Peck stars as King David and the film follows King David's life as he adjusts to ruling as a King, and about his relationship with Uriah's wife Bathsheba, played by Susan Wayward. Goliath of Gath was portrayed by 203 cm-tall (6'8") Lithuanian wrestler Walter Talun. These days Walter would no longer get a bench seat in a high-school basketball team.
ellauri156.html on line 417: King David was the second king of Israel and this film is based on the second book of Samuel from the Bible. When the second Ark of the Covenant is brought to Jerusalem, a soldier reaches out to steady it and is struck dead. While the prophet Nathan declares this the will of God, a skeptical David pronounces it the result of a combination of an electrical shock and too much wine. This blasphemy starts David on the path of sin.
ellauri156.html on line 419: As a consequence, David becomes attracted to Bathsheba who is the wife of Uriah, one of David's soldiers. The attraction is mutual although both know an affair would break the law of Moses. When Bathsheba discovers she is pregnant by David, the King sends for Uriah hoping he will spend time with his wife to cover her pregnancy. David's wife Michal who is aware of the affair, tells David that Uriah did not go home but slept at the castle as a sign of loyalty to his King. LOL, a sign of "fuck you" pointed at Dave with Uriah's middle finger without a nail.
ellauri156.html on line 421: Frustrated, David orders Uriah to be placed on the battle's front and for the troops to withdraw leaving him to die. Uriah is reported dead and David sends a dispatch to tell Bathsheba so they can plan their marriage. Nathan Zuckermann the prophet advises David the people are dissatisfied with his leadership and desire his sons to rule. Nathan tells David he has forgotten that he is a servant of the Lord. David tries in vain to cheer up the old retard. David marries Bathsheba.
ellauri156.html on line 423: As a result, a drought hits Israel. David's and Bathsheba's baby dies. Nathan returns to tell David that God is displeased with his sin. Dog wants to see better ones, with more pizzazz. Or else he will not die as the law demands, but he will be punished through misfortune in his family. David takes responsibility but insists Bathsheba is blameless. But the people want Bathsheba killed. The crowd shouts: No, we want Barabbas! David makes plans to save Bathsheba, but she tells David she is not blameless. She has continued seeing Uriah on the side. (The reports of his demise were premature.) They are both at fault. David is reminded of the Lord and quotes Psalm 23 as he plays his harp. (A nice musical interlude in an otherwise numbing show whose spoiler is long since spoiled.)
ellauri156.html on line 425: David promises Bathsheba she will not die and is willing to accept God's justice for himself, knowing that he as the hero of the book is safe. Repentant, David, seeking relief from the drought and forgiveness reaches out to touch the Ark presuming that he will die of heat stroke (or was it a short?) like the soldier. A clap of thunder is heard and there are flashbacks to David's youth depicting his anointing by Samuel and his battle with Goliath. King David removes his hands from the Ark as rain falls on the dry land. Screenwriter Dunno said he "left it to the audience to decide if the blessed rain came as the result of divine intervention or simply of a low-pressure system moving in from the Mediterranean." Well it could be both, couldn't it?
ellauri156.html on line 429:

2.2 David´s Birth: July 4th

ellauri156.html on line 431: David was about thirty when he began to reign (2 Samuel 5:4), so we can look for a birth date, which according to the pattern of other proposed birth dates in this series should occur both on a Hebrew holy day, at least some other sacred calendars, and also on a date similar on some calendars to his death date. Those requirements are so stringent to occur in a given year that if we find such a date, it is highly likely to be correct. Moreover, in nearly every case so far, the birth date is more impressive than the death date, and David's proposed death date is a sacred day on 4 calendars (also being 1 Condor on the Sacred Round).
ellauri156.html on line 433: Searching for a possible birth date for David produces an ideal candidate, a holy day on 6 of the 7 known sacred calendars. The day Sat 4 Jul 1057 BC was 17 Tammuz (H), 14 Sum (Enoch, Summer Fast), 1 Res (V), 1 Bir (M), 1 Deer (SR), and 1 Jac (Easter on Priest). That Hebrew day is known simply as the Fast of the Fourth Month, which the Lord says will become a day of rejoicing some day (Zech. 8:19). That date ranks with the best birth dates found so far for the prophets. It is identical on the Venus and Mercury calendars to Isaac Bashevis Singer's birthday. This date fits the pattern so well of all the great prophets, as it should to be in Matthew's chain of key links to Christ, that it confirms this whole set of dates as being correct, including the Biblical assertion that the temple was built in the 480th year of the Exodus.
ellauri156.html on line 437: The United States of America was also born on July 4th, the date proposed for David's birth. Is that of any significance? If so, there will also be at least another witness, according to what has been discovered so far in the research. It turns out that Thu 4 Jul 1776 was also 17 Tammuz on the Hebrew calendar as was David's birth, so it may not be by chance that the nation which consistently sides with modern-day Israel was born on David's birthday.
ellauri156.html on line 441: Seeing the success of C. B. DeMille's Samson and Delilah, Zanuck commissioned Philip Dunno to write a script based on King David.
ellauri156.html on line 442: Dunno says his original conception was for a film that would encompass David's life and go into three main chapters: David as a boy fighting Goliath; a more mature David and his friendship with Jonathan, ending with the affair with Bathsheba; and an older David and his relationship with his son Absalom. Dunno wrote a treatment which he estimated would make a four hour movie. Zanuck was not enthusiastic so Dunno then pitched the idea of doing a film just on David and Bathsheba, which Zanuck loved.
ellauri156.html on line 444: Dunno conceived it as a modern-type play exploring the corruption of absolute power. The film is noticeably devoid of the epic battles and panoramas frequently seen in biblical movies. It concentrates more on David's exploits between the sheets.
ellauri156.html on line 447: The musical score was by Alfred Newman (the funny looking kid on the cover of Mad magazine), who, for the bucolic scene with the shepherd boy, used a solo oboe in the Lydian mode, drawing on long established conventions linking the solo oboe with pastoral scenes and the shepherd's pipe. To underscore David's guilt-ridden turmoil in the Mount Gilboa scene, Newman resorted to a vibraphone, which Miklós Rózsa used in scoring Peck's popular 1945 Spellbound, in which he played a no less disturbed patient suffering from amnesia, viz. prophet Nathan Zuckerman.
ellauri156.html on line 449: David and Bathsheba was 20th Century Fox's most successful release of 1951 and the third-highest-grossing film of that year, earning $4.72 million in rentals.
ellauri156.html on line 451: A. H. Weiler of The New York Times described the film as "a reverential and sometimes majestic treatment of chronicles that have lived three millennia." He praised Dunno's screenplay and Peck's "authoritative performance" but found that Wayward "seems closer to Hollywood than to the arid Jerusalem of his Bible." Variety wrote, "This is a big picture in every respect. It has scope, pageantry, sex (for all its Biblical background), cast names, color—everything. It's a surefire boxoffice entry, one of the really 'big' pictures of the new selling season." Philip K. Scheuer of the Los Angeles Times wrote that the film "leaves little to be desired" from the standpoint of production values with Peck "ingratiating" as David and Wayward "a seductress with flaming tresses, in or out of the bath, and only her final contrition is a little difficult to believe." Richard L. Coe of The Washington Post wrote, "On the whole, the picture suggests a Reader's Digest story expanded into a master's thesis for the Ecole Copacabana."] Harrison's Reports wrote, "The outstanding thing about the production is the magnificent performance of Gregory Peck as David; he makes the characterization real and human, endowing it with all the shortcomings of a man who lusts for another's wife, but who is seriously penitent and prepared to shoulder his guilt. Susan Wayward, as Bathsheba, is beautiful and sexy, but her performance is of no dramatic consequence." The Monty Python Bulletin commented that the film had been made "with restraint and relative simplicity" compared to other historical epics, "and the playing of Gregory Peck in particular is competent. The whole film, however, is emotionally and stylistically quite unworthy of its subject." Philip Hamburger of The New Yorker wrote that "the accessories notwithstanding, something is ponderously wrong with 'David and Bathsheba.' The fault lies, I suppose, in the attempt to make excessive enlargements of an essentially-simple story." Zanuck the Hot Dog agreed.
ellauri156.html on line 453: The film sparked protests in Singapore over what the Muslim community considered an unflattering portrait of David, considered an important prophet in Islam, as a hedonist susceptible to sexual overtures. Mohammed and his 9-year old wife would have been outraged.
ellauri156.html on line 461: King David and Diana Garland argue that, "Taking remarkable license with the story, the screenwriters changed Bathsheba from the one who is ogled by David into David's stalker." They go on to suggest that "the movie David and Bathsheba, written, directed and produced by males, makes the cinematic Bathsheba conform to male fantasies about women."
ellauri156.html on line 463: However, in giving Bathsheba a more active role, Adele Reinhartz found that "it reflects tensions and questions about gender identity in America in the aftermath of World War II, when women had entered the work force in large numbers and experienced a greater degree of independence and economic self-sufficiency. ...[Bathsheba] is not satisfied in the role of neglected wife and decides for herself what to do about it." Susan Wayward was later quoted as having asked why the film was not called Bathsheba and David. I guess it has something to do with the fact that Dog is called Dog in the bible instead of Bitch.
ellauri156.html on line 465: When Uriah arrives in Jerusalem, he reports to David, who acts out the charade he has planned. He asks Uriah about the “welfare of Joab and the people,” and the “state of the war.” It troubles me that David needs such a report at all. If he were with his men in the field, this would not be necessary. But even worse, David does not really care about Joab, the people, or the war. David's one preoccupation is to cover up his sin, to get Uriah home and to bed with his wife, and thus to get David off the hook. How sad to read of David's hypocrisy. The king who had compassion on the crippled son of Jonathan now lacks compassion for the whole army, and specifically for Bathsheba and her husband Uriah.
ellauri156.html on line 467: David goes through all the right motions with Uriah. He listens to his reports, and then he gives him the night off, some time to go to his house and “wash his feet.” David is not worried about this soldier's personal hygiene; he is worried about his own reputation. When one entered his house, he usually took off his shoes and washed his feet, in preparation for eating and for going to bed. David very delicately encourages this man to go home and go to bed with his wife. Uriah knows it; our author knows it; and we know it.
ellauri156.html on line 469: Uriah leaves David's presence. Now David adds a further touch. He sends a “present from the king” after, or with, Uriah. How we would love to know just what that “gift” was. Was it a night for two at the Jerusalem Hilton? Was it dinner and dancing at a romantic restaurant? I think we can safely say this: (1) We are not told what the present was. (2) We are not supposed to know, or it would not add to the story for us to know what it was. (3) Whatever it was, it was very carefully planned to facilitate David's scheme of getting Uriah to bed with his wife, as quickly as possible.
ellauri156.html on line 475: On to plan B. David has his spies watching Uriah as though he is the enemy. (Well, he is a rival all right.) They know what David wants; he wants Uriah to go home and sleep with his wife. If they do not know all of the details of what David has done with Bathsheba (which is hard to believe) and what he intends to accomplish by Uriah's visit, they certainly know something out of the ordinary is taking place. One way or the other, David is making these servant-spies co-conspirators with him.
ellauri156.html on line 477: The servant-spies come to David in the morning with an amazing report: “He didn't do it. He didn't even go home!” David then seeks to gently rebuke Uriah. The hypocrisy of David's actions and words are hard to accept. But accept we must, for Dave is Dog's favorite horse on whose nose he is betting his bottom dollar.
ellauri156.html on line 479: He (David, not Dog this time) plays the role of a benevolent master. Uriah, his servant, has “come home from a journey” (verse 10). Is this not the time for him to concern himself with his needs and desires? Is this not the time to concern himself with his wife's needs? How insensitive of Uriah not to go home to be with his wife and to sleep with her. “Shame on you, Uriah!” Uriah has a lot of explaining to do, and so it seems has David.
ellauri156.html on line 481: And explain he does; Uriah's words to his commander-in-chief are as stinging a rebuke as David receives from Nathan in the next chapter. Uriah clearly understands that what David once encouraged him to do (i.e. go to be with his wife) he is now strongly urging -- even commanding -- him to do. Uriah humbly but steadfastly refuses to do this:
ellauri156.html on line 483: Uriah said to David, “The ark and Israel and Judah are staying in temporary shelters, and my lord Joab and the servants of my lord are camping in the open field. Shall I then go to my house to eat and to drink and to lie with my wife? By your life and the life of your soul, I will not do this thing” (2 Samuel 11:11).
ellauri156.html on line 485: Uriah first points out to David that his terminology is inaccurate. David speaks of Uriah returning from a journey (verse 10). The truth is that Uriah has been called from the field of battle. He is not a traveling salesman, home from a road trip; he is a soldier, away from his post. In heart and soul, Uriah is still with his fellow-soldiers. He really wants to be back in the field of battle, and not in Jerusalem. He will return as soon as David releases him (see verse 12). Until that time, he will think and act like the soldier he is. As much as possible, he will live the way his fellow-soldiers are living on the field of battle. There, surrounding the city of Rabbah, are the Israelite soldiers, led by Joab. They, along with the ark of the Lord, are camping in tents in the open field. Uriah cannot, Uriah will not, live in luxury while they live sacrificially. He will not sleep with his wife until they can all sleep with her, not just Dave.
ellauri156.html on line 489: To fully grasp the impact of Uriah's words, let us lick our fingers and turn back a few pages in Samuel's writings to recall David's own words, spoken to Ahimelech the priest, as they relate to this encounter with Uriah:
ellauri156.html on line 491: 1 Then David came to Nob to Ahimelech the priest; and Ahimelech came trembling to meet David and said to him, “Why are you alone and no one with you?” 2 David said to Ahimelech the priest, “The king has commissioned me with a matter and has said to me, 'Let no one know anything about the matter on which I am sending you and with which I have commissioned you; and I have directed the young men to a certain place.' 3 “Now therefore, what do you have on hand? Give me five loaves of bread, or whatever can be found.” 4 The priest answered David and said, “There is no ordinary bread on hand, but there is consecrated bread; if only the young men have kept themselves from women.” 5 David answered the priest and said to him, “Surely women have been kept from us as previously when I set out and the vessels of the young men were holy, though it was an ordinary journey; how much more then today will their vessels be holy?” (1 Samuel 21:1-5). Pyhiä vesseleitä. Tarkoittaako se siemenjohtimia? Ilmeisesti, suomexi se on: palvelijoiden reput ovat olleet pyhät. Reppureissulaisia pyhäkouluretkellä pussit tyhjinä. Kassit jätetään ulkopuolelle.
ellauri156.html on line 493: You may remember that when David first fled from Saul he went to Ahimelech the priest and asked for some provisions and a sword. The priest had nothing but the sacred bread, which he would allow David and his men to eat, if they had only “kept themselves from women” (verse 4). The priest assumes they may have conducted themselves otherwise. David's answer, and especially the tone of it, is very pertinent to our text. He confidently assured the priest that he and his men had kept themselves from women, almost incensed that the priest would think otherwise. And the reason David gives is that he and his men are on a mission for the king. The inference is that this is a military (or at least official) mission.
ellauri156.html on line 495: Now here is a most amazing thing. David, years earlier, was adamant about the fact that those on a mission for the king should keep themselves from sexual intercourse. Now, years later, David is amazed that a man on a mission for the king is willing to abstain from sexual intercourse with his wife. Worse yet, David sets out to convince -- even to compel -- Uriah to go to do so, even though it will cause him to violate his conscience. This is not “causing a weaker brother to stumble;” this is cutting off a stronger brother's "leg" at the knob. Uriah is an example of the commitment expected of every soldier, and of David in particular -- at least the David of the past. Uriah is now acting like the David we knew from earlier days. Uriah is the “David” that David should be. But there is a crucial difference: now David is the king. This makes the case completely different.
ellauri156.html on line 497: Uriah's words should have shocked David into a realization of the depth of his sin. The author uses these words in an ironically pivotal way. Uriah has just told David that he will not go to his own house, that he will not eat and drink and sleep with his wife.41 He has put this matter emphatically: “By your life, and the life of your soul, I will not do this thing” (verse 11). In the very next verses, David compels Uriah to “eat and drink” with him, with the hope that he will lie with his wife. And when Uriah swears by the life of the king that he will not do so, the king ends up taking Uriah's life. How ironic! How tragic! How hilarious!
ellauri156.html on line 501: David is getting desperate. David has not even entertained the possibility that Uriah will refuse his offer. Uriah speaks with such conviction, David knows that he will never violate his duty as a soldier with all of his mental faculties. David lands upon one last modification to his original plan -- get Uriah drunk and then into bed with his wife. After all, don't people do things when they are drunk that they will not do when sober? This will surely bring about David's intended outcome.
ellauri156.html on line 503: It must be with great apprehension that Uriah joins David for dinner this last night in Jerusalem. David begins to eat and to drink, and he will not take no for an answer when he offers food and drink to Uriah. Eventually, it works, for David makes sure that Uriah has enough alcohol in his system to make him drunk. And in this condition, David sends Uriah home to “sleep it off,” in his own bed, of course. Even drunk, Uriah will not violate his wife! Unheard of! Once again, Uriah spends the night at the doorway of David's house, along with his servants. He does not go to his own house, and thus he does not sleep with his wife. David is in deep shit.
ellauri156.html on line 505:

Plan D: In Desperation, David Has Uriah Put To Death (11:14-17)

ellauri156.html on line 507: David has set out on a course of action that backfires. He intends to put Uriah in a position that will make it appear that he is the father of Bathsheba's child. But Uriah's conduct has publicly exhibited his loyalty to his duties as a soldier, making it more than evident that he cannot possibly be the father of this child. It is worse for David now than it had been when he summoned Uriah to Jerusalem. David concludes -- wrongly -- that his only course of action now is to have Uriah killed in action. I don't know that David actually thinks he can deceive the people of Jerusalem as to whose child Bathsheba's baby is. How can he when everyone knows Uriah has never been with his wife to get her pregnant? It seems now as though David is simply trying to legitimize his sin. By making Uriah a casualty of war, he makes Bathsheba a widow. He can now marry this woman and raise the child as his own, which of course it is. Finally, a plan that makes sense.
ellauri156.html on line 509: It must be an agonizing night for David, seeing that even drunk Uriah is a better man than he. But not a better pecker! And so in the morning, David acts. He writes a letter to Joab, which will serve as Uriah's death warrant. In this letter David clearly orders Joab to murder Uriah for him. He even tells him how to do so in a way that might conceal the truth of the matter. In so doing, David can honor Uriah as a war hero, and magnanimously take on the duty of being a husband to Uriah's wife, also taking care of the child she is soon to bear. Joab is to put Uriah on the front lines of battle, at the fiercest place of battle, no surprise for a man of his military skills and courage. Joab is to attack and then retreat in such a way as to make Uriah an easy target for the Ammonites, thus assuring his death. There is no mistaking David's orders to Uriah: he wants Uriah killed in a way which makes it look like a simple casualty of war. Joab complies completely with David's orders (why? Is Uriah a creep?), and Uriah is eliminated, no longer an obstacle to David's plans. In giving this order to Joab, David makes him a part of this conspiracy, making him share the guilt for the spilled blood of Uriah. David's sin continues to encompass more and more people, leading to greater and greater sin.
ellauri156.html on line 511: In all likelihood, this was all in a day's work for the Israeli army even then. So it is not strange to see David, the mighty man of valor, (1 Samuel 16:18) dealing with Uriah, another mighty man of valor, like the enemy. Here is Uriah, a man who will give his life for his king (but not his wife? Did David even ask?), and David, a man who is now willing to take Uriah's life to cover his sin. We all know that it doesn’t work. (Actually, we all know that it works perfectly: David will be honored by posterity as the best Israeli king ever.) How strange it is to see David making Joab his partner in crime, especially after what Joab has done to li'l Abner:
ellauri156.html on line 513: 26 When Joab came out from David, he sent messengers after Abner, and they brought him back from the well of Sirah; but David did not know it. 27 So when Abner returned to Hebron, Joab took him aside into the middle of the gate to speak with him privately, and there he struck him in the belly so that he died on account of the blood of Asahel his brother. 28 Afterward when David heard it, he said, “I and my kingdom are innocent before the LORD forever of the blood of Abner the son of Ner. 29 “May it fall on the head of Joab and on all his father's house; and may there not fail from the house of Joab one who has a discharge, or who is a leper, or who takes hold of a distaff, or who falls by the sword, or who lacks bread.” 30 So Joab and Abishai his brother killed Abner because he had put their brother Asahel to death in the battle at Gibeon (2 Samuel 3:26-30).
ellauri156.html on line 518: Abner is initially mentioned incidentally in Saul's history, first appearing as the son of Ner, Saul's uncle, and the commander of Saul's army. He then comes to the story again as the commander who introduced David to Saul following David's killing of Goliath. He is not mentioned in the account of the disastrous battle of Gilboa when Saul's power was crushed. Seizing the youngest but only surviving of Saul's sons, Ish-bosheth, also called Eshbaal, Abner set him up as king over Israel at Mahanaim, east of the Jordan. David, who was accepted as king by Judah alone, was meanwhile reigning at Hebron, and for some time war was carried on between the two parties.
ellauri156.html on line 522: However, according to Josephus, in Antiquities, Book 7, Chapter 1, Joab had forgiven Abner for the death of his brother, Asahel, the reason being that Abner had slain Asahel honorably in combat after he had first warned Asahel and tried to knock the wind out of him with the butt of his "spear". However, probably by intervention of God, his obtuse tool went through Asahel. The Bible says everyone stopped and gawked. That shows that something like this never happened before. This battle was part of a civil war between David and Ish-bosheth, the son of Saul. After this battle Abner switched to the side of David and granted him control over the tribe of Benjamin. This act put Abner in David's favor.
ellauri156.html on line 524: For some time afterward the war was carried on, the advantage being invariably on the side of David. At length, Ish-bosheth lost the main prop of his tottering cause by accusing Abner of sleeping with Rizpah, one of Saul's concubines, an alliance which, according to contemporary notions, would imply pretensions to the throne. Starhill stablessa oli muuten issikkatamma nimeltä Rispa. Kukahan senkin kanssa nukkui öisin tallissa?
ellauri156.html on line 526: Abner was indignant at the rebuke, and immediately opened negotiations with David, who welcomed him on the condition that his wife Michal should be restored to him. This was done, and the proceedings were ratified by a feast where Rizpah and Michal were the lights of the party. Almost immediately after, however, Joab, who had been sent away, perhaps intentionally returned and slew Abner at the gate of Hebron. The ostensible motive for the assassination was a desire to avenge Asahel, and this would be a sufficient justification for the deed according to the extremely low moral standard of the time (although Abner should have been safe from such a revenge killing in Hebron, which was a City of Refuge). The conduct of David after the event was such as to show that he had no complicity in the act, though he could not venture to punish its perpetrators.
ellauri156.html on line 528: David had Abner buried in Hebron, as it states in Samuel 3:31-32,[10] "And David said to all the people who were with him, 'Remove your clothes and gird yourselves with this sackcloth taking turns, and wail before me and Li'l Abner.' And King David went after the beer. And they buried Abner in Hebron, and the king raised his voice and wept on Abner's grave, and all the people wept."
ellauri156.html on line 535: Shortly after Abner's death, Ish-bosheth was assassinated as he wept, and David became king of the reunited kingdoms. The conduct of David after the event was such as to show that he had no complicity in the act, though he could not venture to punish its perpetrators.
ellauri156.html on line 539: His One Sin: The rabbis agree that Abner deserved this violent death, though opinions differ concerning the exact nature of the sin that entailed so dire a punishment on one who was, on the whole, considered a "righteous man" (Gen. R. lxxxii. 4). Some reproach him that he did not use his influence with Saul to prevent him from murdering the priests of Nob (Yer. Peah, i. 16a; Lev. R. xxvi. 2; Sanh. 20a)—convinced as he was of the innocence of the priests and of the propriety of their conduct toward David, Abner holding that as leader of the army David was privileged to avail himself of the Urine and Thumbeline (I Sam. xxii. 9-19). Instead of contenting himself with passive resistance to Saul's command to murder the priests (Yalḳ., Sam. 131), Abner ought to have tried to restrain the king by the balls. Others maintain that Abner did make such an attempt, but in vain (Saul had not enough to get a proper hold of), and that his one sin consisted in that he delayed the beginning of David's reign over Israel by fighting him after Saul's death for two years and a half (Sanh. l.c.). Others, again, while excusing him for this—in view of a tradition founded on Gen. xlix. 27, according to which there were to be two kings of the house of Benjamin—blame Abner for having prevented a reconciliation between Saul and David on the occasion when the latter, in holding on to the skirt of Saul's robe (I Sam. xxiv. 11), showed how unfounded was the king's mistrust of him, seeing Saul had no balls to speak of. Old Saul was inclined to be happy with a pacifier; but Abner, representing to him that the naked David might have found a piece of garment anywhere — even just a piece of sackcloth caught on a thorn — prevented the reconciliation (Yer. Peah, l.c., Lev. R. l.c., and elsewhere). Moreover, it was wrong of Abner to permit Israelitish youths to kill one another for sport (II Sam. ii. 14-16). No reproach, however, attaches to him for the death of Asahel, since Abner killed him in self-defense (Sanh. 49a).
ellauri156.html on line 541: It is characteristic of the rabbinical view of the Bible narratives that Abner, the warrior pure and simple, is styled "Lion King of the Law" (Yer. Peah, l.c.), and that even a specimen is given of a halakic discussion between him and Dog as to whether the law in Deut. xxiii. 3 excluded Ammonite and Moabite women from the Jewish community as well as men. Dog was of the opinion that David, being descended from the Moabitess Ruth, was not fit to wear the crown, nor even to be considered a true Israelite; while Abner maintained that the law affected only the male line of descent. When Dog's dialectics proved more than a match for those of Abner, the latter went to the prophet Samuel, who not only supported Abner in his view, but utterly refuted Dog's assertions (Midr. Sam. xxii.; Yeb. 76b et seq.).
ellauri156.html on line 550: Earlier in this series: David condemned Joab and put him under a curse because he shed the innocent blood of Abner. Now, this same David (well, not really the same David) now uses Joab to kill Uriah and get him out of his way. David's enemy (Joab) has become his friend, or at least his ally. David's enemies (the Ammonites) have become his allies (they fire the fatal shots which kill Uriah). And David's faithful servant Uriah has been put to death as though he were the enemy. Not only is Uriah put to death, but a number of other Israelite warriors die with him. They have to be sacrificed to conceal the murder of Uriah. Uriah's death has to be viewed as one of a group of men, rather than merely one man. Without a doubt, this is the moral and spiritual low-water mark of David's life.
ellauri156.html on line 552: These eight verses, devoted to the way in which Uriah's death is reported, are double the length of the account of David's sin with Bathsheba. They virtually equal the length of the account of David's dealings with Uriah. These verses begin with Joab's careful instructions to the messenger, who is to bring the news of Uriah's death to David. They conclude with the messenger's actual report and David's response to it. Why does the author devote so much time and space to the way in which Uriah's death is reported to David? Let us see if we can find the answer to this question as we look more closely at these verses.
ellauri156.html on line 554: Mission accomplished: Uriah is dead. Joab has carried out David's instructions to the letter. Now Joab must send word to David, in a way that does not completely disclose this conspiracy. Joab calls for a messenger to go to David. He gives very exacting instructions to him. He is first to give a full and complete report of the events of the war, including the ill-fated attack on the city, and the slaughter of Uriah and those with him. Why is how the messenger reports this incident so important?
ellauri156.html on line 558: This the reason for Joab's careful instructions to the messenger. He is to report the attack on the city of Rabbah to David, and then tell of the Israelite losses which result. Joab knows that David will react (perhaps hypocritically) to the report of the attack and the resulting losses. It is at this point, Joab instructs the messenger, that he is to inform David of the death of Uriah. This will certainly end any protest or criticism on David's part.
ellauri156.html on line 560: And so in verses 22-25 we are given an account of the messenger's arrival, of his report to David, and of David's response. I must point out that the messenger does not do as he is told, at least the way I read the account. The messenger goes to David and tells the king how the Ammonites prevailed against them as they left the city and pursued the Israelites into the open field. The Israelites then pursued the Ammonites, pushing them back toward the city as far as the city gate. It was here that Uriah and those with him were fighting. It was here that they were within range of the archers, who shot at them and killed a number of servants. And quickly the servant adds, “and your servant Uriah the Hittite is also dead” (verse 14).
ellauri156.html on line 562: Now why does this messenger not wait for David to respond in anger, as Joab instructed? Why does he inform David that Uriah has been killed, before he even utters a word of criticism or protest? I believe the messenger gives the report in this way because he understands what is really going on here. I think he may know about David and Bathsheba, and perhaps even of her pregnancy. He certainly knows that Uriah was summoned to Jerusalem. I think he also figures out that David wants to get rid of Uriah, and that Joab has accomplished this by this miserable excuse for an offensive against the enemy. I think the messenger figures out that if David knows Uriah has been killed, he will not raise any objections to this needless slaughter. And so, rather than wait for David to hypocritically rant and rave about the stupidity of such a move, he just goes on and tells him first, so that he will not receive any reaction from David.
ellauri156.html on line 566: Then David said to the messenger, “Thus you shall say to Joab, 'Do not let this thing displease you, for the sword devours one as well as another; make your battle against the city stronger and overthrow it'; and so encourage him” (2 Samuel 11:25).
ellauri156.html on line 568: These words of David are the frosting on the cake. They seem gracious and understanding, even sympathetic. In effect, David is saying, “Well, don't worry about it. After all, you win a few, and you lose a few. That's the way the cookie crumbles.” Uriah, a great warrior and a man of godly character (but not a Jew, mind you), has just died, and David does not express one word of grief, one expression of sorrow, not one word of tribute. Uriah dies, and David is unmoved. Contrast his response to the death of Uriah with his responses to the deaths of Saul and Jonathan (2 Samuel 1:11-27), and even of Abner (2 Samuel 3:28-39). This is not the David of a few chapters earlier. This is a hardened, callused David, callused by his own sin.
ellauri156.html on line 570: Our text has many applications and implications for today. Let me suggest a few as I conclude this lesson. First, “Can a Christian fall?” Yes. Some folks in the Bible may cause us to question whether they really ever came to please Dog, folks like Balaam or Samson or Saul. But we have no such questions regarding David. He is not only a believer, he is a model believer. In the Bible, David sets the standard because he is a man after God's heart. Nevertheless, this man David, in spite of his popularity in Dog's circles, in spite of his marvelous times of worship and his bea-u-utiful psalms, falls deeply into sin. If David can fall, so can we, which is precisely what Paul, another crook and tricky Dick, warns us about:
ellauri156.html on line 574: Second, “How far can a Christian fall?” This far [Bob points down there with his fingers]. David not only commits the sin of adultery, he commits murder. I think it is safe to say that there is no sin of which the Christian is not capable in the flesh. I have heard people say, “I don't know how a person who _______ could have ever been a Christian.” There are times -- like this time for David -- when it is obvious that we will hardly be saved by the testimony of our actions. Christians come from just the same gene pool of motherfuckers as the rest of us.
ellauri156.html on line 576: Third, “How fast can a Christian fall?” This fast [Bob flaps his hands]. It is amazing how quickly David falls into the sins depicted in this one chapter. In a matter of weeks, or months at best. Apart from God's sustaining grace, we can fall very far, very quickly. Let us be reminded of this fact from David's tragic experience.
ellauri156.html on line 578: Fourth, "How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?" Sin snowballs. Sin has not got a snowball's chance in hell. Sin is not stagnant; it is not static. Sin grows. Look at the progression of sin in our text. David's sin starts when he ceases to act like a soldier and (what is way worse) becomes a late sleeper. David's sin grows from staying up late to adultery to murder. His sin begins very privately, but as the story progresses, more and more people become aware of it, and worse yet, more and more people become participants in it. His sin first acted out by his taking another man's wife, and then taking another man's life, and along with his life, his wife, plus the lives of a number of men who must die with him to make his death credible. David's sin blossoms so that it transforms a true and loyal friend (Uriah) to his enemy, and his enemies (the Ammonites, and his other rival Joab) into his allies.
ellauri156.html on line 580: Fifth, when we seek to conceal our sin, things only get worse. Thus, the best course of action is to confess our sins and to forsake them. But that would have been an embarrassing loss of face to Dog, who had been rooting for David all this time. So better not, after all. Everything went well in the end anyway, and that's what counts.
ellauri156.html on line 582: He who conceals his transgressions will not prosper, except for David, and a few others, come to think of it. But he who confesses and forsakes them will find compassion (Proverbs 28:13). And that is all he finds. Quite often compassion at his scaffold and grave.
ellauri156.html on line 584: How much better it would have been for David simply to have confessed his sin with Bathsheba and found forgiveness then? Not a whit, it would only made matters worse. Who was Bathsheba anyway to show forgiveness to the king? Just another skirt.
ellauri156.html on line 588: Sixth, our text makes Uriah a hero and a dress model, not a chump and not a sucker. There are those who might conclude that Uriah's elevator may not “go to the top floor” (as my neighbor used to say of those she considered less than bright). Is Uriah gullible? Is he ignorant of what David is trying to do? Is he a coon? A spook? I don't think so. This is what makes his loyalty to David and to God's Law so striking. I think it is safe to say that here Uriah is very much like David in his earlier days, in terms of his response to Saul. As Saul sought to kill David unjustly, because he was jealous of his successes, so also David submitted himself to faithfully serving Saul, his master. He left his safety and future in God's hands, and God did not fail him. Who? Not Uriah, apparently.
ellauri156.html on line 590: Seventh, Uriah is a reminder to us that God does not always deliver the righteous from the hand of the wicked immediately, or even in this lifetime. This is a really crucial point! Don't except to be saved except ex post facto. Daniel's three friends told the king that their God was able to deliver them. They did not presume that He would, or that He must, only that theoretically, he could if he wanted to. And God did deliver them, though with late delivery, rather like today's postal services. I think Christians should look upon this sort of deliverance as the rule, rather than the exception. But when Uriah faithfully serves his king (David), he loses his life. God is not obliged to “bail us out of trouble” or to keep us from trials and tribulations just because we trust in Him. Sometimes it is the will of God for men to trust fully in Him and to submit to human government (what? like U.S. government? No way Jose!), and still to suffer adversity, from which God may not deliver us. Spirituality is no guarantee that we will no longer suffer in this life. In fact, spiritual intimacy with God is often the cause of our sufferings (see Matthew 5).
ellauri156.html on line 613: 13 All these died in faith, without receiving the promises, but having seen them and having welcomed them from a distance, and having confessed that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. 14 For those who say such things make it clear that they are seeking a country of their own. 15 And indeed if they had been thinking of that country from which they went out, they would have had opportunity to return. 16 But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God; for He has prepared a city for them. 32 And what more shall I say? For time will fail me if I tell of Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets, 33 who by faith conquered kingdoms, performed acts of righteousness, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from weakness were made strong, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight. 35 Women received back their dead by resurrection; and others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection; 36 and others experienced mockings and scourgings, yes, also chains and imprisonment. 37 They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tempted, they were put to death with the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, in foreskins, being destitute, afflicted, ill-treated 38 (men of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts and mountains and caves and holes in the ground. 39 And all these, having gained approval through their faith, did not receive what was promised, 40 because God had provided something even better for us, to make up for the wait, so that apart from us they would not be made perfect (Hebrews 11:13-16, 32-40).
ellauri156.html on line 615: Uriah should not be criticized or looked down upon for his loyalty and submission to David. He should be highly commended. In fact, a friend suggested a new thought for my consideration: “Suppose that Uriah was added to the list of war heroes because of his loyalty and courage in this battle which cost him his life? It is a possibility to consider. Uriah is one of those Gentile converts whose faith and obedience puts many Israelites to shame. He is among many of those who have trusted and obeyed God who have not received their just rewards in this life, but who will be rewarded in the coming kingdom of God. Too many Christians today want their blessings “now” and are not willing to suffer, waiting for their reward then. Let them think carefully about the example of Uriah for their own lives. His elevator may have not gone all the way to the top floor, but by Gawd, he will reach it when Jacob lets down the ladder!
ellauri156.html on line 618: 39 We know that while David was at the cave of Adullam, his brothers and all his father’s household, along with others in distress, came to David there, fearing the wrath of Saul (1 Samuel 22:1-2). Joab, Abishai, and Asahel were all the sons of Zeruiah, the sister of David (1 Chronicles 2:16). I infer from this that these three men joined David at the time his family joined him.
ellauri156.html on line 619: 40 Note here that there was a three-day feast of David and the men who joined with him. This was certainly a time to get to know these men.
ellauri156.html on line 620: 41 Is this, by any chance, a clue as to what the “present” was that David sent after Uriah in verse 8? Was the present some “food and drink”? I wonder. 42 Uriah’s actions raise some interesting questions about those who get themselves drunk. It seems to me that our text strongly implies that even drunk, a man cannot be forced to violate his convictions, unless of course he wants to do so. I wonder how many people get drunk because they want to do what they do drunk, and they think they can blame alcohol for their own sin? It seems like another version of, “The Devil made me do it.”
ellauri156.html on line 623:

11. David and God (a.k.a. Nathan) (2 Samuel 12)

ellauri156.html on line 629: Now this little fellow was one lamb among a great many. Nevertheless, he enjoyed the distinction of being regarded as a “pet lamb.” (I am coming to te most narcissistic part of my sermon, going to introduce you to the good shepherd in a moment.) In the story which Nathan tells David, it is not quite the same. Nathan tells David of a “pet lamb” who is the only sheep of a poor farmer. This lamb does not live in a pen outside the house; it lives inside the house, often in the loving hairy arms of its master, and eats the same food he eats. This is the story Nathan tells David, which God uses to expose the wretchedness of David's sin. It is our text for this message, and once again, it has much to teach us, as well as David. Let us give careful heed to the inspired words of Nathan, and learn from a lamb. (I bet the lamb had much more to learn from the "boys".)
ellauri156.html on line 633: David has become king of both Judah and Israel. He has, in large measure, consolidated his kingdom. He has taken Jebus and made it his capital city, renaming it Jerusalem. He has built his palace and given thought to building a temple (a plan God significantly revises). He has subjected most of Israel's neighboring nations. He has done battle with the Ammonites and prevailed, but he has not yet completely defeated them. The Ammonites have retreated to the royal city of Rabbah, and as the time for war (spring) approaches, David sends all Israel, led by Joab, to besiege the city and to bring about its surrender. David has chosen not to endure the rigors of camping in the open field, outside the city. He has chosen rather to remain in Jerusalem. Sleeping late, David rises from his bed as others prepare to go to bed for the night. David strolls about the rooftop of his palace and happens to steal a look at a beautiful young woman bathing herself, perhaps ceremonially, in fulfillment of the law.
ellauri156.html on line 635: It is not due to any intent on her part, nor even any indiscretion. She is bathing herself as darkness falls, and being poor (see 12:1-4), she does not have the privilege of complete privacy, especially when the king can look down from the lofty heights of his rooftop vantage point. David is struck with her beauty and sends messengers to inquire about her identity. They inform David of her identity, and that she is married to Uriah, the Hittite. That should have ended his interest, but it does not. David sends messengers who take her, bringing her to his palace, and there he sleeps with her. When she cleanses herself, she goes home. (Or was it the other way round? Can't remember.)
ellauri156.html on line 637: It all seems to be over. David is not looking for another wife; he is not even looking for an affair. He is looking for a conquest. That should have happened on the battlefield, not in the bedroom! Things take a very different turn when Bathsheba sends word to David that she is pregnant. David first seeks to cover up his sin by ordering Joab to send Uriah home on furlough, ostensibly to give David a report on the war. David's efforts to get Uriah into bed with Bathsheba begin as subtle hints, then change to veiled orders, and then turn crass as David seeks to get Uriah to do drunk what he will not do sober. When these efforts fail (due to Uriah's noble character), David sends Uriah back to Joab, with written orders to Joab to put him to death in a way that makes it seem like a casualty of war. Joab does as he is told and sends word to David: “Mission accomplished.” It is here that our apparently never-ending story resumes.
ellauri156.html on line 641: Bathsheba's response to the death of her husband is as we would expect, as we would also hope. From what the text tells us, she has absolutely no part in David's plot to deceive her husband, let alone to put him to death. Undoubtedly, she learns of Uriah's death in much the same way every war widow does, then or now. When she is officially informed of Uriah's death in battle, she mourns for her husband. We cannot be certain just how long this period of mourning is. We know, for example, that if a virgin of some distant (i.e., not Canaanite) nation was captured by an Israelite during a raid on her town, the Israelite could take her for a wife after she had mourned for her parents (who would have been killed in the raid) for a full month (Deuteronomy 21:10-13). As I will seek to show in a moment, I believe Bathsheba's mourning is genuine, and not hypocritical. I believe she mourns her husband's death because she loves him.
ellauri156.html on line 643: David, on the other hand, does not even bother to go through the pretense of mourning. He does not even try to be hypocritical. When other mighty men of Israel died, David led the nation in mourning their loss. David mourned for Saul and his sons, killed in the battle with the Philistines (2 Samuel 1). David mourned the death of Abner, wickedly put to death by Joab (2 Samuel 3:28ff.). He even sent a delegation to officially mourn the death of Nahash, king of the Ammonites (2 Samuel 10). But when Uriah is killed “in battle,” not a word of mourning comes from David's lips. He is not sorry; he is relieved. Instead of instructing others to mourn for Uriah, he sends word to Joab not to take his death too seriously.
ellauri156.html on line 645: When Bathsheba's mourning is complete, David sends for her and brings her to himself as his wife. Wait, was little David born as yet, or did he start fucking her with her belly full? I do not see him bending down on his knees, proposing. I do not see him courting her, sending her roses. I see him “taking” her once again. And again. In fact, this is my favourite part. The question in my mind is, “Why?” Why does David take Bathsheba into his house as one of his wives? I do not think he is any longer trying to “cover up” his sin; it is far too late for that. She must be “showing” her pregnancy by now, and it is hard to imagine how all Israel cannot know what has been going on. It appears that at this point, David is not trying to conceal his sin, but to legitimize it. Whatever David's reasons may be, they are hardly spiritual, and they are most certainly self-serving.
ellauri156.html on line 647: Nathan has a response to the death of Uriah too, which is taken up in the first part of chapter 12. But let us save that until after drawing your attention to something which has been going on in David's life that we have not seen from our text, and which the author of Samuel has not recorded. But David himself discloses this to us in one of his psalms, written in reflection of this incident in our text.
ellauri156.html on line 649:

David is Divinely Prepared for Repentance (Psalm 32:3-4)

ellauri156.html on line 658: Psalm 32 is one of two psalms (the other is Psalm 51) in which David himself reflects on his sin, his repentance, and his recovery. Verses 3 and 4 of Psalm 32 are the focus of my attention at this point in time. These verses fit between chapters 11 and 12 of 2 Samuel. The confrontation of David by Nathan Zuckermann the prophet, described in 2 Samuel 12, results in David's repentance and confession. But this repentance is not just the fruit of Nathan's rebuke; it is also David's response to the work God has been doing in David's heart before he confesses, while he is still attempting to conceal his sin.
ellauri156.html on line 660: In these verses, David makes it clear that God is at work even when it does not appear to be so. During the time David tries to cover up his sin, God is at work exposing it in his heart. These are not times of pleasure and joy, as Satan would like us to conclude; they are days of misery. David is plagued with guilt. He cannot sleep, and it seems he cannot eat. Worst of all, he cannot fuck. He is not sleeping nights, and he is losing weight. Whether or not David recognizes it as God who is at work in him, he does know he is miserable. It is this misery which tenderizes David, preparing him for the rebuke Nathan Zuckermann is to bring, preparing him for repentance. David's repentance is not the result of David's assessment of his situation; it is the result of divine intervention. Hey wait? If that is the case, where is the much-advertised free will? He has gone so far in sin that he cannot think straight. God is at work in David's life to break him, so that he will once again cast himself upon God for grace. He has good experience in casting himself upon folk, from Saul thru Jonathan to Bathsheba.
ellauri156.html on line 664: 121Herra lähetti Natanin Daavidin luo. Kuninkaan luo tultuaan Natan sanoi: »Eräässä kaupungissa oli kaksi miestä, rikas ja köyhä. 2Rikkaalla oli suuret määrät lampaita ja härkiä, 3mutta köyhällä ei ollut kuin yksi ainoa pieni karitsa, jonka hän oli ostanut. Hän elätti karitsaa, ja se kasvoi hänen luonaan yhdessä hänen lastensa kanssa. Se söi hänen leipäänsä ja joi hänen kupistaan, se makasi hänen sylissään ja oli hänelle kuin tyttöystävä (wink wink). 4Mutta kerran rikkaan miehen luo tuli vieras. Rikas ei raskinut ottaa yhtään omista lampaistaan tai häristään valmistaakseen ruokaa matkamiehelle, joka oli tullut hänen luokseen, vaan otti köyhän miehen karitsan ja teki siitä vieraalleen aterian.»
ellauri156.html on line 666: 5Daavid suuttui kovasti tuolle miehelle ja sanoi Natanille: »Niin totta kuin Herra elää, se mies, joka noin teki, on kuoleman oma. 6
ellauri156.html on line 668: 7 Silloin Natan sanoi Daavidille: »Se mies olet sinä. Näin sanoo Herra, Israelin Jumala: ’Minä voitelin sinut Israelin kuninkaaksi lampaanrasvalla ja pelastin sinut Sauli Niinistön käsistä. 8Minä korotin sinut herrasi asemaan, annoin herrasi vaimot sinun syliisi ja annoin sinulle Israelin ja Juudan heimot. Jos tämä on vähän, voin antaa vielä mitä tahansa muutakin. 9
ellauri156.html on line 673: 13 Silloin Daavid sanoi Natanille: »Olen nähtävästi tehnyt syntiä Herraa vastaan.» Natan vastasi: »Herra vapauttaa nyt sinut tästä synnistä, eikä sinun tarvitse kuolla. 14 Mutta koska olet tällä teolla rikkonut pahasti Herraa vastaan, niin sinulle syntynyt poika kuolee.» Tää on tosi reilua. Omaisuusrikos korvataan omaisuuden menetyxellä.
ellauri156.html on line 675: There are several important things to note about this meeting between Nathan and King David. First, note that Nathan is sent to David. Nathan is, of course, a prophet. However it comes about, he knows what David has done. If you will pardon the pun, David cannot pull the wool over his eyes. His words are, in the final analysis, the very word of God (see 12:11). If Nathan is a prophet, he is also a man who seems to be a friend to David. One of David's sons is named Nathan (2 Samuel 5:14). David informs Nathan of his desire to build a temple (chapter 7). Nathan will later christen (sorry, name) Bathsheba's and David's second son (12:25). He will remain loyal to the king and to Solomon when Adonijah seeks to usurp the throne (1 Kings 2). Nathan does not come to David only as God's spokesman, he comes to David as his friend.
ellauri156.html on line 679: Second, note that Nathan is sent to David. Twelve times in the last chapter the word “sent” is employed by the author. A number of these instances refer to David “sending” someone or “sending” for someone. David is a man of power and authority, and so he can “send out” for whatever he wants, including the death of Uriah. Now, it is God who does the “sending.” Herra se on herrallakin. Is David impressed with his power and authority? Has he gotten used to “sending” people to do his work for him (like sending Joab and all Israel to fight the Ammonites)? Let David take note that God is sending Nathan. He is a godsend to Dave.
ellauri156.html on line 681: Third, Nathan comes to David with a story. In the New American Standard Bible, this is not just a story, but a kind of poetic story. In my copy of the NASB, the words of the story are formatted in such a way as to look like one of the Psalms.43 It took me a while to take note of this, but if this is so, it means that Nathan comes to David prepared. Under divine inspiration, I am sure God could inspire a prophet to utter poetry without working at it in advance, but this does not seem to be the norm. Nathan comes to David well prepared. He is not just “spinning a yarn;” Nathan is telling a story, a very important story with a very important message for David. A message for you sir. Nih Nih.
ellauri156.html on line 683: Fourth, Nathan's story is a “sheep story,” one that a shepherd can easily grasp and with which he can readily identify. David was a shepherd boy in his younger days, as we know from the Book(s) of Samuel (see 1 Samuel 16:11; 17:15, 28). I wonder if in those lonely days and nights David does not make a “petlamb” of one or more of his sheep? You bet. Some comfort for his lonely nights. Did this sheep eat of his food and drink from his cup? Did this sheep give him a blowjob? Possibly so.
ellauri156.html on line 685: Fifth, the story Nathan tells David does not “walk on all fours” -- that is, there is no “one to one correspondence” with the story of David's sin with Bathsheba and Uriah. The sheep (which we would liken to Bathsheba) is put to death, not the owner (whom we would liken to Uriah). I think it is important to take note of this fact, lest we press the story beyond its intent.
ellauri156.html on line 687: Why a story? Why not just let David have it head-on, with both barrels, like David did with Bathsheba? Many will point out that this is a skillfully employed tactic, which gets David to pronounce judgment on the crime before he realizes that he is the criminal. I think this is true. David is angry at this “rich man's” lack of compassion. If he could, he would have this fellow put to death (!). But as it is, justice requires a four-fold restitution. But having already committed himself in principle, Nathan can now apply the principle to David, in particular.
ellauri156.html on line 701: That is part of the reason Nathan told David this story. It was never meant to be a makeover of David's sin; it is meant to expose David's sin in principle, in a way that cannot be denied. Having done this very well, Nathan then presses on to deal with David's sin specifically.
ellauri156.html on line 703: The story Nathan tells David is very simple. Two men lived in the same city; one was very rich and the other was very poor. The rich man had flocks and herds.44 The rich man did not just have a large flock and a large herd; he had many flocks and many herds. We would say this man was “filthy rich.” The poor man had but one ewe lamb; this was his “pet lamb.” He purchased it and then raised it in his own home. The lamb spent much time in the man's lap and being carried about. It lived inside the house, not outside, being hand fed with food from the table and even drinking from its master's cup.
ellauri156.html on line 709: I hope I am not guilty of attempting to make this story “walk on all fours” when I stress the same thing the story does -- that there is a very warm and loving relationship between the rich man and the poor man's “pet lamb.” It really tasted great! Considered along with everything else we read about Uriah and Bathsheba and David, I must conclude that the author is making it very clear that Uriah and Bathsheba dearly loved each other. Anyway, who cares this way or that, it was his lamb. When David “took” this woman to his bedroom that fateful night, and then as his wife after the murder of Uriah, he took her from the man she loved. Bathsheba and Uriah were devoted to each other, which adds further weight to the arguments for her not being a willing participant in David's sins. It also emphasizes the character of Uriah, who is so near to his wife, who is being urged by the king to go to her, and yet who refuses to do so out of principle.
ellauri156.html on line 711: David does not see what is coming. The story Nathan tells makes David furious. The David who was once ready to do in Nabal and all the male members of his household (1 Samuel 25) is now angry enough to do in the villain of Nathan's story. Doing in folks was one of his pet lambs. In some ways, David's response is a bit overdone. He reminds me a bit of Judah in Genesis 38, when he learns that Tamar, his daughter-in-law is pregnant out of wedlock. Not realizing that he is the father of the child in her womb, Judah is ready to have Tamar burned to death. How ironic that those who are guilty of a particular sin are intolerant of this sin in the life of others. Well said, Bob! Christians are really hard on people who have no charity.
ellauri156.html on line 713: David identifies two evils that have been committed by this fictional rich man. First, the man has stolen a lamb, for which the law prescribed a fourfold restitution (Exodus 22:1).
ellauri156.html on line 722: Second, David recognizes what he views as the greater sin, and that is the rich man's total lack of compassion. David is furious because a rich man stole and slaughtered a poor man's pet. He does not yet see the connection to his lack of compassion for stealing a poor man's beloved companion, Uriah's wife, Bathsheba. The slaughtering of Uriah is most certainly an act which lacks compassion. The crowning touch in David's display of righteous indignation is the religious flavoring he gives it by the words, “as the Lord lives” (verse 5).
ellauri156.html on line 726: Nathanin rapsut Davidille oli suhteellisen leppeät, vaan ei-toivotun lapsen kuolema. Ei mitään vakavaa, mutta eihän syntikään ollut kuolemanvakava. Mixi naisten naurattamisesta pitäsi tulla itkua ja hampaiden kiristelyä? Jaa olihan siinä se Urian valitettava tapaus, mutta mitä oli niin typerä. Tyhmst päästä kärsii koko ruumis.
ellauri156.html on line 728: David has just sprung the trap on himself, and Nathan is about to let him know about it. The first thing Nathan does is to dramatically indict David as the culprit: “You are the man!” In stunned silence, David now listens to the charges against him. David thinks only in terms of the evils the rich man committed against his neighbor, stealing a man's sheep and depriving him of his companion. Put another way, David thinks only in terms of crime and socially unacceptable behavior, not in terms of sin. In verses 7-12, Nathan draws David's attention to his sin against God and the consequences God has pronounced for his sin. Note the repetition of the pronoun “I” in verses 7 and 8: “It was I who. . .
ellauri156.html on line 734: God speaks to David as though he has forgotten these things, or rather as though he has come to take credit for them himself. Everything David possesses has been given to him by God. Has it been so long since David was a lowly shepherd boy that he has forgotten? David is a “rich” man because God has made him rich. And if he does not think he is rich enough, God will give more to him. David has begun to cling to his “riches,” rather than to cling to the God who made him rich.
ellauri156.html on line 738: I fear some of us tend to miss the point here. We read Nathan's story and we hear Nathan's rebuke as though David's sin is all about sex. David does commit a sexual sin when he takes Bathsheba and sleeps with her, knowing she is a married woman. But this sexual sin is symptomatic, according to Nathan, and thus according to God. God is not just saying, “Shame on you, David. Look at all the wives and concubines you had to sleep with. And if none of these women pleased you, I could have given you another woman, just one that was not already married.” Wow, this is the same 'gotcha' as with Adam earlier: I give you about anything as long as you keep your fingers off my property.
ellauri156.html on line 740: Nathan tells David the story of a rich man and a poor man. God tells David through Nathan that all that he possesses (his riches) it is he, the boss, who has given them to him. God is like the rich man, and David the poor one with just the one. David's problem is that his possessions have come to own him. He is so stingy he won't even give his petlamb to Mr. Rich. He is so “possessed” with his lamb that he is unwilling to spend it when his boss has a party. He wants “more” and “more,” and so he begins to take what isn’t his to take, rather than to ask the divine Giver for all he has and more.
ellauri156.html on line 742: We can see now why David wrote these words in Psalm 51:4: “Against Thee, Thee only, I have sinned. Never mind the neighbors.”
ellauri156.html on line 744: First and foremost, David's sin is against God. He has ceased to humbly acknowledge God as the Giver of all he possesses. He has ceased to look to God to provide him with all his needs -- and his desires. David has not only ceased to ask God to supply his needs, he has disobeyed God's commands by committing adultery and murder. David's sin against God manifests itself by the evils he commits against others. Nathan outlines these, employing a repetitive “you:”
ellauri156.html on line 755: Nathan now proclaims the irreversible consequences to come upon David and his family due to his sin: Therefore the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Us and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife. With an equally repetitive "I will":
ellauri156.html on line 766: The evil David commits against others is clear disobedience to the revealed Word of God. David is a “man after God's own heart,” and yet in this instance, David “despised the Word of the Lord.” While David does repent and the guilt of his sin is forgiven, these consequences will not be reversed. These consequences are just; they fit the crime David committed. He used the sword of the Ammonites to kill Uriah, and so the sword will not depart from his house. He took the wife of another man, and so his own wives will be taken by another, another from his own house.
ellauri156.html on line 768: The consequences are not only appropriate, but intensified. David took one man's wife; another will take several (I bet four) of his wives. This happens when Absalom rebels against his father's rule and temporarily takes over the throne. Following the advice of Ahithophel, Absolom pitches a tent on the roof of David's palace (the place from which David first looked upon Bathsheba) and there, in the sight of all Israel, sleeps with David's concubines as a declaration that he has taken over his father's throne and all that goes with it (2 Samuel 16:20-22). While David seeks to commit his sins in private, God sees to it that the consequences are very public. Aijaa. Kai tää Absalom-tarinakin täytyy vielä lehteillä.
ellauri156.html on line 770: The story goes on as you well know, but we shall stop here, having focused on Nathan's divinely directed rebuke of David. In our next lesson we will give thought to David's repentance and to the immediate consequences of his sin. But let us close this message by considering some very important take-home lessons for us to learn from David's sin and Nathan's rebuke.
ellauri156.html on line 780: (3) God is under no obligation to stop us from sinning. (So why did he bother with David then? Is he some sort of special case? Of course he is, he is Dawgs petlamb. Sometimes people justify their sin by saying something like: “I've prayed about it and asked God to stop me if it is wrong. . . .” When God does not stop them, they somehow assume it must be right. God could have stopped David after he chose to stay home from the war, or after he began to covet Uriah's wife, or after he committed adultery, but instead He allowed David to persist in his sin for some time. God even allowed David to get away with murder, for a time. Well actually, for good. It was just a immigrant after all. God's Word forbade David's sins of coveting, adultery, and murder. God's Word commanded David to stop, and he did not. God allowed David to persist in his sin for a season, but not indefinitely. God allowed David's sin to go full circle, to reach full bloom, so that he (and we) could see how sin grows (compare Genesis 15:12-16).
ellauri156.html on line 782: (4) David's sin was not intended as an excuse for us to sin, but as a warning to all of us how capable we are of sin. I have heard it said more times than I wish to recall, “Well, even David sinned. . . .” What they mean is, “How can you expect me not to sin? If David, as spiritual as he was, sinned as he did, then how can you expect me to do any better?” Fair enough. But Where these guys go wrong is that they are not Gawds petlambs, no preferential treatment is in the offing for them. Gawd will cross them like cockroaches. Or leece.
ellauri156.html on line 796: Let me press this matter even further. David did not plan to sin, as many who try to use his sin as an excuse do. David “fell” into sin; those who would use his sin for an excuse “plunge headlong” into sin. There is a very important difference. In addition, David's sin was the exception, not the rule:
ellauri156.html on line 798: Because David did what was right in the sight of the LORD, and had not turned aside from anything that He commanded him all the days of his life, except in the case of Uriah the Hittite, and, well, in a minor way, stalking Bathsheba while she was washing herself and then fucking her without leave (1 Kings 15:5, emphasis mine).nn
ellauri156.html on line 800: (5) David's sin, like all sin, is never worth the price. I have actually had people ask me what the penalty for a certain sin would be, planning to do it and then be forgiven. There are those who toy with sin, thinking that if they sin, they may suffer some consequences, but that God is obliged to forgive them, and thus their eternal future is certain and secure, no matter what they do, even if intentionally. I know of one situation in which a church leader left his wife and ran off with the wife of another, planning to later repent, and then expecting to be welcomed back into the fellowship of that church. This is presumptuous sin, sin of the most serious and dangerous kind. Rather than open a “can of worms” at this point in this message, let me simply say this: “No one ever chooses to sin, and then comes out of it with a smile on their face.” My friend Dawg will almost certainly wipe that smug smirk off their face. I still seethe when I think of that colleague of mine, and how he got away with dumping her hag and plucking a dainty dish from Brother ... (better not say). Took just a few months for the brotherhood to relent. Fuck, it shouldn't be that easy! A little more speedy delivery of the retribution would be indicated, don't you think, milord? Not that I criticize you in any way, milord.
ellauri156.html on line 804: I have never met a Christian who chose to sin, and after it was all over felt that it was worth the price. Those that did quite simply were not Christians. David's sin and its consequences should not encourage us to sin, but should motivate us to avoid sin at all costs. The negative consequences of sin far outweigh the momentary pleasures of sin. Sin is never worth the price, even for those whose sin is forgiven. Sin is not worth it even when it's free of charge. In fact, we ought to be paid to commit sin. (Some do, like the adulterous woman in Proverbs, and Trick Dick's burglars. But we won't open that can of worms now that we are this close to the finish line.)
ellauri156.html on line 806: (6) It was the story of the slaughter of a lamb which exposed the immensity of David's sin. It is the story of the slaughter of The Lamb of God which exposes the immensity of our sins. (I am not suggesting that this comparison is on all fours, though the thought is close. Like the rich man slaughtering the poor people's only lamb to have a feast.) Isn't it amazing that David was so blinded by his own sin that he could not see it? It was by means of the story of the slaughter of a poor man's pet lamb that David was gripped with the immensity of the sin which was his own. David could see his own sin when he heard the story of what appeared to be the sin of another.
ellauri156.html on line 812: That is precisely what the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ does for us. We were dead in our trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1-3). We were blinded to the immensity of our sins (2 Corinthians 4:4). The coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, His perfect life, His innocent and sacrificial death, His literal and physical resurrection are all historical events. But the gospel is also a story, a true story. When we read the New Testament Gospels, we read a story that is even more dramatic, more amazing, more disturbing than the story Nathan told David. When we see the way unbelieving men treated our Lord, we should be shocked, horrified, and angered. We should cry out, “They deserve to die!” And that they do. But the Gospel is not written only to show us their sins -- those who actually heard Jesus and cried, “Crucify Him, Crucify Him” -- it is written so that the Spirit of God can cry out in our hearts, “Thou art the man! Yo mon!” When we see the way men treated Jesus, we see the way we would treat him, if he were here. We see how we treat him today. With laughter and ridicule. And that, my friend, reveals the immensity of our sin, and the immensity of our need for repentance and forgiveness. Words, words, words. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
ellauri156.html on line 814: The Gospel of Jesus Christ is “Good News.” (No, it is Dog's breakfast. You must be thinking of euangelion.) The “Good News” is the death of our Lord, which reveals the immensity of our sin, is the immense workload of God by which he can and will forgive us of our sin. (Recall here Dosto's and many other mystics' meme that everybody should feel guilty of everything. They really enjoy it! It is some variant of algolagnia.) By His innocent and sacrificial death, Jesus died in our place, paid the penalty for our sins. Come to think of it, the logic of this story IS on all fours with God's judgment on David's oversight: Not nice but don't worry, I'll cash your debt on some innocent scapegoat.
ellauri156.html on line 816: He bore ours sins on the cross! And by trusting in His death, burial, and resurrection, we die to sin (or sin to die, pick your choice, like David from Nathan's deck of bottom cards) and are raised to novelty products of eternal life, in Christ. The Gospel must first bring us to a recognition of the magnitude of our sin, and of our guilt, and then it takes us to the magnitude of God's grace in Jesus Christ, by which our sins can be forgiven. Have you come to see how great your sins are before a holy God? Then I urge you to experience how great a salvation is yours, brought about by this same God, through the death, burial, and resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ. What a Relief! Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a relief it is.
ellauri159.html on line 894: For those of you who are not familiar with Myers-Briggs or the MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator), it is a personality profiling system based on Jung’s typological theory that was developed by Katherine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers. In the Myers-Briggs typology system, there are sixteen personality types consisting of four letters: E for extrovert or I for introvert, S for sensor or N for intuitive, T for thinker or F for feeler, and P for perceiver or J for judger. Psychologist David Keirsey later sorted these types into four temperaments. You can read more about Myers-Briggs here and find books about it here. Myers-Briggs typology can offer a lot of insight into how someone thinks, and in the case of an author, how someone writes.
ellauri159.html on line 1177: You draw inspiration from being a know-it-all and educating people. You tend to read extensively and to collect words they consider particularly apt, like David Wallace. If their writing project involves others, you often take a leadership role, and repeat the word 'actually' in everybody´s face. You may also beep like a truck on reverse. You thrive in a harmonious atmosphere where everyone respects your opinion. Having a strong need to feel in control of your projects, you want to work in a cooperative environment conducive to driving a project to completion.
ellauri160.html on line 307: Antropologi David Graeber ja arkeologi David Wengrow kirjoittivat kymmenessä vuodessa kirjan, joka haukkuu monet viime vuosien suositut populaarit historiateokset lyttyyn ja mullistaa esimerkiksi käsityksemme siitä, mistä eurooppalainen valistus tuli.
ellauri160.html on line 579: reinkarnaatiossa minä olin Aabraham ja hän Haagar, minä Ruben ja hän Bilhah, minä Booas ja hän Ruut, minä Daavid ja hän Batsheba... Hän kuiski salaisuuksia ja nuoli korvaani. Hän alkoi pian opettaa minulle uusia asentoja, muunnelmia ja omia mielettömiä oikkujaan. Kysyin häneltä hänen aikaisemmista puolisoistaan ja rakastajistaan ja hän julisti: "Minä kaipaan heitä kaikkia! Minä haluaisin saada heidät kaikki yhtä aikaa niin että he repisivät minut palasiksi ja minusta ei jäisi mitään haudattavaa! He sylkisivät päälleni ja hukuttaisivat minut sylkeen." Tästä puuttuu ainakin vielä Jael ja Taamar.
ellauri160.html on line 648: According to legend, Agrat and Lilith visited King Solomon disguised as prostitutes. The spirits Solomon communicated with Agrat were all placed inside of a genie lamp-like vessel and set inside of a cave on the cliffs of the Dead Sea. Later, after the spirits were cast into the lamp, Agrat bat Mahlat and her lamp were discovered by King David. Agrat then mated with him a night and bore him a demonic son Ashm'dai and later Ashmodai, named after Asmodeus, who is identified with Hadad the Edomite.
ellauri160.html on line 652: About 1000 years after the era of Solomon and David, another widely known intervention occurred known as "The spiritual intervention of Hanina ben Dosa and Rabbi Abaye" which ended up curbing her malevolent powers over humans.
ellauri161.html on line 494: Now, one friend said that "Don't Look Up" was a masterpiece. Well, I wouldn't go as far as to calling it a masterpiece. Sure, "Don't Look Up" was a watchable movie, and writers Adam McKay and David Sirota definitely had some good jabs at the crazy world we live in today, with the likes of a crazy president, everything being on social media, people being concerned about riches even when facing extinction and such. I found the movie to be watchable and enjoyable, sure, but it wasn't a masterpiece, nor will it become a classic movie for me.
ellauri161.html on line 496: The comedy used in "Don't Look Up", as written by Adam McKay and David Sirota wasn't really something that had me laughing. Sure, I could see the jabs at society and the ridiculing of certain aspects of the society and world we live in today, but it didn't make me laugh.
ellauri161.html on line 964: Dans des yeux où longtemps burent nos yeux avide ! silmissä jotka ennen kazoivat vain sinua?
ellauri161.html on line 968: David mourant aurait demandé la santé David viimeisillään toivoi sulta hoitoa,
ellauri162.html on line 762: Number 1 David Silverman is President of American Atheists, the organization founded in 1963 by the grande dame of American atheism, Madalyn Murray O’Hair (1919–1995). He is a Jew. You know it´s a myth. Religion is my bitch. Bitches, I don´t trust ´em But they give me what I want for the night.
ellauri163.html on line 48: He wrote the drama Got fun nekome (God of Vengeance) in the winter of 1906 in Cologne, Germany. It is about a Jewish brothel owner who attempts to become respectable by commissioning a Torah scroll and marrying off his daughter to a yeshiva student. Set in a brothel, the play includes Jewish prostitutes and a lesbian scene. I. L. Peretz famously said of the play after reading it: "Burn it, Asch, burn it!" Instead, Asch went to Berlin to pitch it to director Max Reinhardt and actor Rudolph Schildkraut, who produced it at the Deutsches Theater. God of Vengeance opened on March 19, 1907 and ran for six months, and soon was translated and performed in a dozen European languages. It was first brought to New York by David Kessler in 1907. The audience mostly came for Kessler, and they booed the rest of the cast. The New York production sparked a major press war between local Yiddish papers, led by the Orthodox Tageplatt and even the secular Forverts. Orthodox papers referred to God of Vengeance as "filthy," "immoral," and "indecent," while radical papers described it as "moral," "artistic," and "beautiful". Some of the more provocative scenes in the production were changed, but it wasn't enough for the Orthodox papers. Even Yiddish intellectuals and the play's supporters had problems with the play's inauthentic portrayal of Jewish tradition, especially Yankl's use of the Torah, which they said Asch seemed to be using mostly for cheap effects; they also expressed concern over how it might stigmatize Jewish people who already faced much anti-Semitism. The association with Jews and sex work was a popular stereotype at the time. Other intellectuals criticized the writing itself, claiming that the second act was beautifully written but the first and third acts failed to support it.
ellauri163.html on line 247: The name 'Shiloh' means 'the Bearer of Rest'. 'Shiloh' does not refer to a city or a group. 'Shiloh' is the name of the coming Messiah - the promised Seed, through Whom all the families of the earth would be blessed - the One Who brings rest for the soul and is the fulfilment of all Scripture - Jesus the Messiah - the son of David - the son of Abraham - the father of Isaac - the father of Jacob - the father of Judah and his brother.
ellauri163.html on line 249: Mut hetkinen, mitäs sukua sit David oli näille pojille? Vai oliko mitään? Oliko se mamu? Matthew ilta löytyy koko sukupuu:
ellauri163.html on line 253: This is the genealogy[a] of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham:
ellauri163.html on line 279: and Jesse the father of King David.
ellauri163.html on line 282: David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife the callipygous Bathsheba,
ellauri163.html on line 339: Thus there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Messiah.
ellauri163.html on line 373: There wasn't a King for hundreds of years after the blessing before the first king of the tribe of Judah (before Saul and David). Tthere was that whole slavery period in Egypt for hundreds of years, then Moses, then Joshua, then the judges long before Saul the firs tking of the tribe of Judah.
ellauri163.html on line 380: "The scepter shall not depart Judah" means that the right to kingship will forever belong to the tribe of Judah. This is re-enforced in Prophets when first David and then his son, Solomon, are told that they are the rightful bloodline for the throne. Others have sat on the throne but they were not rightful heirs.
ellauri163.html on line 392: The right to the throne was then, and is now, the right of the tribe of Judah through a genetic link to David and Solomon. Nothing more. Nothing less.
ellauri163.html on line 402: All of the Jewish translations (and commentaries) deal with a future time, the messianic era, during which there will be a king, a direct descendant from King David, sitting on the Davidic throne. The closing phrase of the blessing given to Judah defines the role of the expected future Jewish king, Messiah, in the world. Ultimately, his job will be to gather the nations under the banner of the One G-d of peace. If a gathering of the nations for the sake of peace is the first explicit description of the messianic era, it clearly suggests something that is natural, recognizable, and human.
ellauri163.html on line 862: David Émile Durkheim was born 15 April 1858 in Épinal, Lorraine, France, to Mélanie (Isidor) and Moïse Durkheim, coming into a long lineage of devout French Jews. As his father, grandfather, and great-grandfather had all been rabbis, young Durkheim began his education in a rabbinical school. However, at an early age, he switched schools, deciding not to follow in his family's footsteps. I bet dad, grandad and greatgranddad were all very disappointed. In fact, Durkheim led a completely secular life, whereby much of his work was dedicated to demonstrating that religious phenomena stemmed from social rather than divine factors. Despite this fact, Durkheim did not sever ties with his family or with the Jewish community. Actually, many of his most prominent collaborators and students were Jewish, some even blood-related.
ellauri164.html on line 195: Berkeleyn runosta "On the Prospect of Planting Arts and Learning in America" otti David Foster Wallace nimen pienoisromaanilleen Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way. Runosta on saanut herätteensä myös Yhdysvaltain kongressitalon seinällä oleva Emanuel Gottlieb Leutzen muraali.
ellauri164.html on line 933: Did Moses realize immediately what he had done? At some point after this event, “the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron, ‘Because you did not believe Me, to hallow Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land which I have given them.’” Their conduct had publicly displayed a lack faith, reverence and respect. God determined that this needed an equally public punishment. The punishment for this sin was grievous. God gave to them a punishment so similar to the one given to all Israel at Kadesh that it was a heart-breaking moment for Moses. Both he and Aaron would die in the wilderness and not be allowed to enter the promised land. What a bitter pill for Moses to swallow. Like David with Bathsheba, God forgave the sin, but did not remove the consequences. The consequences for Moses’ momentary lapse in reverence and respect under the terrible emotion of anger was to be barred from entrance into the promised land.
ellauri164.html on line 939: Conclusion. Though the water came, Moses was severely punished. He was punished in a way that no amount of repentance could remove. As noted above, the sin was forgiven, but the consequences of the sin could not be. Because Moses had sinned publicly and God wanting Israel to understand His righteousness, He would not relent. “Then I pleaded with the Lord at that time... I pray, let me cross over and see the good land beyond the Jordan, those pleasant mountains, and Lebanon ... the Lord said to me: ‘Enough of that! Speak no more to Me of this matter.’ ... you shall not cross over this Jordan.” (Deut. 3:23-27). There is a lot of important lessons we can learn from Moses. This sin is one of them. Though Moses had fallen short of God’s glory here, God forgave him. Yet the consequences of the sin were deeply distressing. So it was with David, Paul and Job. So will it be with us. We need to hate sin and realize that the consequences can sometimes be severe.
ellauri171.html on line 146: Rahabista tuli kuningas Daavidin esi-isä, ja Daavidin suvusta tuli Jeesus Kristus, Messias. Rahabilla oli keskeinen rooli Jumalan pelastussuunnitelmassa maailmalle. Sen korjaamiseen tarvittiin useampi kuin yksi huora, kuten tulemme näkemään. Maailman vanhin ammatti, tärkeä naisellinen rooli juutalais-kristillisessä mytologiassa. Jatka lukemista alta.
ellauri171.html on line 177: Boas käytti leviraatin oikeuttaan sukulaisena-lunastajasetämiehenä, nai Ruthia, joka olisi voinut olla hänen tyttärensä, eikä hänen ikäänsä lähempänä olevan Noomia ja varsinaista juutalaista (ihmettelen miksi?), ja pelasti molemmat naiset köyhyydestä. Matteuksen mukaan Ruut oli kuningas Daavidin esi-isä, jonka jälkeläinen oli Jeesus Kristus. Boas oli ennen armoton mies, mutta ei enää. Hyvä vaimo tietää paikkansa. Toinen naisesikuva Raamatussa.
ellauri171.html on line 183: Luvussa 3, Boas käskee Ruthia ojentamaan vaatteensa ja laittaa sitten hänen päälleen kuusi mittaa ohraa – epärealistisen suuren määrän – mikä saa hänet näyttämään raskaana. Ruth kertoo Naomille, että Boas ei halunnut hänen palaavan anoppinsa luo "tyhjänä". Boas oli 80-vuotias ja Ruut 40-vuotias, kun he menivät naimisiin (Rut R. 6:2), ja vaikka hän kuoli häiden jälkeisenä päivänä (Mid. Ruth, Zuta 4:13), heidän liittoonsa siunattiin lapsi, Obed, Davidin isoisä. Melkoinen puintisessio. Ruth kävi läpi noin 1 epphah ohraa päivässä. Efa vastaa vakaa. Siksi vastaa 8 kuivaa gallonaa. Kuiva gallona on 8 kiloa viljaa. Efa on siis noin 30 kg viljaa. 6 niistä olisi 180kg. Ihme! Jatka lukemista alta. Источник: https://eastmanind.com/farm-equipment/how-long-was-the-barley-harvest-in-the-book-of-ruth.html.
ellauri171.html on line 198: Lisäksi hän kunnioitti lupaustaan ​​antamalla hänet takaisin Jumalalle. Herra antoi herra otti, kiitetty on herran nimi. Ota antaa kanankakan kantaa. Samuelista tuli lopulta viimeinen Israelin tuomareista, profeetta ja kuningas Saulin ja Daavidin neuvonantaja. Opimme Hannalta, että kun suurin halusi on antaa kunniaa Jumalalle, hän täyttää tämän pyynnön. Hän on todellinen kunnian imejä. Unbefriedigte Frau, toinen naisen näennäinen rooli Raamatussa. Jatka lukemista alta.
ellauri171.html on line 206: Batseballa oli aviorikossuhde kuningas Daavidin kanssa, ja Jumalan avulla hän ei vain nauttinut siitä, vaan muutti sen hyväksi. Daavid nukkui Batseban kanssa, kun hänen miehensä Uuria oli lähdössä sotaan. Kun Daavid sai tietää Batseban olevan raskaana, hän järjesti hänen miehensä tapetun taistelussa. Hieno temppu David! Vaikea ymmärtää, miksi oli niin tärkeää tulkita Jeshua tämän kaikkien aikojen huijarin jälkeläiseksi.
ellauri171.html on line 208: Profeetta Naatan kohtasi Daavidin ja pakotti hänet tunnustamaan syntinsä. Vaikka tuo vauva kuoli, Batseba synnytti myöhemmin Salomon, viisaimman koskaan eläneen miehen. Batseba osoitti, että Jumala voi ennallistaa syntiset, jotka palaavat hänen luokseen. Jatka lukemista alta.
ellauri171.html on line 479: Absalomin kuohuva kauna sisarensa Tamarin raiskauksesta (katso Tamarin tarina) leviää lopulta avoimeksi kapinaksi isäänsä Davidia vastaan, joka ei koskaan rankaissut raiskaajaa, koska hän oli itse myrkyllinen #metoo-mies jonka mielestä naisissa on reikä juuri sitä varten.
ellauri171.html on line 481: Mutta Absalom saa lättyyn, kun hän kohtaa isänsä apumiehet taistelussa, joka tapahtuu Efraimin metsässä. Absalomin kouluttamattomat miliisit ovat epäedullisessa asemassa Daavidin korkeasti koulutettuihin palkkasoturiin verrattuna, ja heidät leikellään haarukkapaloixi. Metakassa Absalomin pitkät hiuspidennykset takertuvat puun alaoksiin, ja hän jää avuttomaksi heilumaan puusta.
ellauri171.html on line 483: Daavidin kenttäpäällikkö Joab kuulee tästä. Hän ratsastaa nopeasti paikalle ja syöksee muutaman keihään Absalomin sydämeen. Sitten Joabin henkivartijat lopettavat työn. Mitä tästä on opittavaa? Pidä hiuksesi lyhyinä tai sido ne tiukkaan nutturaan tai käytä hiusverkkoa kuten svedut. Takatukka ei ole hyvä sotatoimissa.
ellauri171.html on line 487: Muutama vuosi Tamarin raiskauksen jälkeen (katso mehukkaimmat palat siitä täältä), Absalom johti kapinaa isäänsä kuningas Daavidia vastaan. Hän pystyi valloittamaan kuninkaallisen Jerusalemin kaupungin ja pakottamaan isänsä pakenemaan sekä paneskelemaan sen sussuja tasakatollaj.
ellauri171.html on line 489: Nimittäin, Kun hän tunkeutui itse palatsiin, hän huomasi, että Daavid oli jättänyt taakseen kymmenen hehkeätä haareminaista. Häntä neuvottiin raiskaamaan nämä kymmenen naista peräperää julkisesti katolla kaupungin näkyvissä, jotta ei olisi epäilystäkään siitä, että teko oli tehty. Tämä näet poltti Absalomin sillat isänsä kanssa ja teki mahdottomaksi perääntyä täydestä kapinasta.
ellauri171.html on line 491: Absalom raiskasi naiset (melko urakka) häpäisemällä isänsä naisia ​​aivan kuten hänen omaa sisartaan Tamaria oli häpäisty. Koska paikka, jossa hän teki tämän, oli lähes varmasti palatsin kattoterassilla, se oli hyvin todennäköisesti sama paikka, jossa Daavid oli ensimmäisen kerran nähnyt Batseban, ironinen käänne eikö totta, jonka tarinan kertoja pani merkille.
ellauri171.html on line 493: Absalomin kapina Daavidia vastaan ​​ei onnistunut, ja nuori mies kuoli kauhean taistelun jälkeen tukka sotkussa. Kymmenen raiskatun naisen kohtalosta vitun väliä, mutta mitä Tamarille kävi?
ellauri171.html on line 727: The battle, a David and Goliath situation: sumo wrestler towers over a small boy.
ellauri171.html on line 808: Ahabin dynastia omridit eli kuningas Omrin porukat oli jotain kananiittejä. Israel Finkelstein's The Bible Unearthed presents a very different picture of the Omrides than the circumcision handbook, making them responsible for the great empire, magnificent palaces, wealth, and peace in Israel and Judah that the Bible credits to the much earlier kings David and Solomon. According to Finkelstein, the reason for this discrepancy is the religious bias of the Biblical authors against the Omrides for their polytheism, and in particular their support for elements of the Canaanite religion.
ellauri171.html on line 1063: Tamar’s place in the family and Judah’s posterity are secured. She gives birth to twins, Perez and Zerah (Gen 38:29–30; 1 Chr 2:4), thus restoring two sons to Judah, who has lost two. Their birth is reminiscent of the birth of Rebekah’s twin sons, at which Jacob came out holding Esau’s heel (Gen 25:24–26). Perez does him one better. The midwife marks Zerah’s hand with a scarlet cord when it emerges from the womb first, but Perez (whose name means “barrier-breach”) edges his way through. Cuts the queue. From his line would come David. Not surprising.
ellauri171.html on line 1065: Tamar was assertive of her rights and subversive of convention. She was also deeply loyal to Judah’s family. These qualities also show up in Ruth, who appears later in the lineage of Perez and preserves Boaz’s part of that line. The blessing at Ruth’s wedding underscores the similarity in its hope that Boaz’s house “be like the house of Perez, whom Tamar bore to Judah” (Ruth 4:12). Tamar’s (and Ruth’s) traits of assertiveness in action, willingness to be unconventional, and deep loyalty to family are the very qualities that distinguish their descendant, King David.
ellauri171.html on line 1099: Tamara 2 was the beautiful daughter of the great King David and Maacah, a princess from a neighboring kingdom. Her half-brother Amnon became obsessed with her.
ellauri171.html on line 1100: He lured her to his room and raped her, then refused to marry her. Niin aina. She was disgraced, and never married. Her embittered brother Absalom rebelled against David, but was defeated and killed. Tamar lived out her days in the royal harem getting fucked on and off by the great King.
ellauri171.html on line 1102: David had a number of wives, but one of the most high-ranking was Maacah, the daughter of King Talmai of the neighboring kingdom of Geshur. Maacah had two children, both of them extraordinarily good-looking. The first was her son Absalom, a favorite of his father’s, the other her daughter Tamar, whose looks stood out even in this family of beautiful children.
ellauri171.html on line 1105: When Tamar reached puberty her half-brother Amnon, David’s eldest son, developed an unnatural obsession with his young half-sister. He watched her, he waited in places where she passed, he could not get enough of her presence, and above all he wanted to possess her.
ellauri171.html on line 1108: Why not? At that time it would have been a possibility, though not a preferred one. Perhaps the marriage that had been arranged for Tamar was too politically sensitive to upset, or maybe Amnon thought that David would disapprove of his obsession, seeing it as a weakness. After all, a king could not afford to let emotions interfere with politics. Remember Batsheba, haha.
ellauri171.html on line 1117: Amnon took to his bed, feigning illness. This caused consternation in the court. The health of a king’s eldest son was no small matter, and David was concerned. The doctors were consulted, and when they could not come up with a cure he visited his son, coming to the room where the young man lay.
ellauri171.html on line 1119: Amnon sighed in a dispirited way and said he could not eat, but on being pressed by his father admitted that yes, he might be able to eat if his sister Tamar cooked some food and fed it to him. David, gullible in matters regarding his sons, immediately sent for Tamar to come and tend her brother.
ellauri171.html on line 1126: Since they were directly commanded to go, her servants also had to leave the room – David’s heir was not someone to be crossed. Then, still feigning the irritation of a sick person, he went into the bedroom alcove and insisted he would only eat the food if she brought it to him there and fed him with her own hand.
ellauri171.html on line 1145: Other wives of David and their children would be sympathetic, but would quickly look to see what they could gain from Amnon’s crime – which way the wind blew, and what chance might there be to seize some political advantage for themselves. Among them would be Bathsheba, a commoner newly introduced into the harem.
ellauri171.html on line 1152: When her brother Absalom found out what had happened he comforted her as best he could, and moved her out of the harem into his own house. Then he went to the King and demanded that Amnon marry his sister – marriage between a half-brother and sister was a possibility in this extreme case, though biblical law prohibited it elsewhere. But for his favorite king David Jehovah was prepared to make an exception.
ellauri171.html on line 1154: Prince Amnon refused outright to marry her, the callous streak already evident in David now coming out in the son. David was angry, but did nothing to resolve the situation, or even to punish Amnon for what he had done. This was typical of David – he could never chastise his sons even when they deserved it. Instead he did what many people have done when confronted with rape or incest – he protected the abuser rather than the victim, and tried to hush things up.
ellauri171.html on line 1156: Since David did nothing to remedy the wrong, people around Tamar were powerless to help the girl. Like many a victim of crime she gradually became invisible, the crime ignored, not spoken of.
ellauri171.html on line 1160: Absalom waited, biding his time. For two years he said nothing, did nothing, but then he set his trap. He gave a feast for all David’s sons. At the height of the festivities when Amnon was half-drunk, Absalom had his half-brother killed, stabbed to death in a scene reminiscent of a Mafia killing. In the ensuring turmoil Absalom escaped, fleeing for sanctuary to Geshur, his grandfather’s territory.
ellauri171.html on line 1164: It is to be hoped that Tamar did not accompany her brother to Geshur, since her status there would have been even worse that in Israel. Instead, Maacah may have used what little influence she now had to see that her daughter returned to David’s harem. In either place Tamar’s position would have been lowly, little better than a servant. Tamar means ‘date palm’; the name suggests a date palm.
ellauri171.html on line 1192: 7 (Nyt näet aiempina aikoina Israelissa, jotta omaisuuden lunastus ja siirto olisi lopullista, toinen osapuoli riisui sandaalinsa ja antoi sen toiselle. Tämä oli tapa laillistaa liiketoimet Israelissa.) 8 Niin huoltaja-lunastaja sanoi Boasille: "Osta itse." Ja hän riisui sandaalinsa. 9 Silloin Boas ilmoitti vanhimmille ja kaikelle kansalle: "Tänään te olette todistajat, että olen ostanut Noomilta kaiken Elimelekin, Kilionin ja Mahlonin omaisuuden. 10 Olen myös hankkinut vaimoksi Ruutin Moabilaisen, Mahlonin lesken, säilyttääkseni kuolleiden nimen hänen omaisuudellaan, jottei hänen nimensä katoaisi hänen perheestään eikä kotikaupungistaan. Tänään olette todistajia!" 11 Silloin vanhimmat ja kaikki portilla oleva sanoivat: "Me olemme todistajia. Tehköön HERRA kotiisi tulevan naisen Raakelin ja Lean kaltaiseksi, jotka yhdessä rakensivat Israelin perheen. Olkoon sinulla asema Efratassa ja ole kuuluisa Betlehemissä. 12 Sen jälkeläisen kautta, jonka Herra antaa sinulle tämän nuoren naisen kautta, olkoon sinun perheesi Pereksen sukulainen, jonka Taamar synnytti Juudalle." 13 Niin Boas otti Ruutin, ja hänestä tuli hänen vaimonsa. Kun hän rakastell hiäntä, HERRA antoi hiänelle mahdollisuuden tulla raskaaksi, ja hiän synnytti pojan. 14 Naiset sanoivat Noomille: "Kiitetty olkoon Herra, joka ei tänä päivänä ole jättänyt sinua ilman huoltajaa-lunastajaa. Tulkoon hänestä kuuluisa kaikkialla Israelissa! 15 Hän uudistaa elämäsi ja tukee sinua vanhuudessasi. Sillä miniäsi, joka rakastaa sinua ja on sinulle parempi kuin seitsemän poikaa, on synnyttänyt hänet." 16 Sitten Noomi otti lapsen syliinsä ja piti hänestä huolta. 17 Siellä asuvat naiset sanoivat: "Noomilla on poika!" Ja he antoivat hänelle nimen Obed (ven. "päivällinen"). Hän oli Iisain, Daavidin isän, isä. 18 Tämä on siis Pereksen sukupuu: Peres oli Hesronin isä, jne. ad nauseam.
ellauri172.html on line 206: Saul, coraggioso guerriero, fu incoronato re di Israele su richiesta del popolo e consacrato dal sacerdote Samuele, che lo unse in nome di Dio. Col tempo, però, Saul si allontanò da Dio finendo per compiere diversi atti di empietà. Allora Samuele, su ordine del Signore, consacrò re un umile pastore: David. Questi fu chiamato alla corte di Saul per placare con il suo canto l'animo del re, e lì riuscì ad ottenere l'amicizia di Gionata, figlio del re, e la mano della giovane figlia di Saul, Micol.
ellauri172.html on line 208: David generò però una forte invidia nel re, che vide in lui un usurpatore e al tempo stesso vi vide la propria passata giovinezza. David venne perseguitato da Saul e costretto a rifugiarsi in terre dei filistei (e per questo accusato di tradimento).
ellauri172.html on line 210: La vicenda del Saul narra le ultime ore di vita del re e vede il ritorno di David, che da prode guerriero è accorso in aiuto del suo popolo in guerra con i Filistei, pur sapendo bene il rischio che ciò poteva comportare per la sua vita. David è pronto a farsi uccidere dal re, ma prima vuole poter combattere con il suo popolo.
ellauri172.html on line 212: Saul vedendolo lo vuole uccidere, ma dopo averlo ascoltato si convince a dargli il comando dell'esercito. David ad un certo punto commette però un errore, parlando di “due agnelli” in Israele, e ciò genera il delirio omicida di Saul verso il giovane. Saul poi spiega a Gionata la dura legge del trono, per la quale “il fratello uccide il fratello”. Davanti al re arriva il sacerdote Achimelech, che porta a Gionata la condanna divina e lo mette al corrente dell'avvenuta incoronazione di David. Il re fa uccidere il sacerdote, e da lì egli andrà sempre più verso il delirio.
ellauri180.html on line 205: Relics of anti-Semitism are evident throughout history and even the statue of Michelangelo's David (a Jew), which was erected in Florence in 1504 was carved uncircumcised.
ellauri182.html on line 269: Ei kaveri, näillä aiheilla et hevin pääse hilloviivalle, varoittelee David Morin, minkä myös scientific reviewer, tuplabaccalaureus Viktor Sander päätä pyörittäen vahvistaa. Impotenssi näytti puuttuvan keskustelunaiheista. Se kuuluisi ehkä tohon vihon viimeiseen aiheryhmään.
ellauri183.html on line 141: avidhalperin.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Jessica3-769x1024.jpeg" />
ellauri183.html on line 585: David Fartley kertoo kuinka esinahka ryöstettiin sitten Rooman säkistä vuonna 1527. Saksan sotilas, joka varasti sen, vangittiin kylässä Calcata, 47 km Roomasta pohjoiseen, myöhemmin samana vuonna. Calcatassa sijaitseva hotelli kunnioitettiin siitä lähtien, kun kirkko hyväksyi aitoustodistuxen sen tarjottua kymmenen vuoden ajan hemmottelua joka tyydytti sekä pappisroistoja että pyhiinvaeltajia. Pyhiinvaeltajat, nunnat ja munkit kokoontuivat kirkkoon, ja "Calcatasta [tuli] pakollinen kohde pyhiinvaelluskartalla". Paikallinen pappi ilmoitti varastaneensa esinahan vuonna 1983.
ellauri184.html on line 108: Aika nihkeitä oli turistit Betlehemissä kun ei voineet luovuttaa yhtä huonetta ensisynnyttäjälle. "Maxoin tästä runsaasti." Jooseppina en olis niin mainostanut sukusiteitä Daavidin, siihen puolimamuun kusipäähän. Mitä ne sitäpaizi auttoivat poikapuolen asiaa.
ellauri184.html on line 149: Ei kyllä normaalisti kukaan elä 40 päivää pelkällä vedellä. Sirkkoja ja hunajaa pitää saada syödä vähintään. Tähän tulee ne Jesajan ruovonpäristäjät, tarhapöllöt ja liekkiöt albumista 160. Jeshuaa pelottaa. J-la sanoo: sä paastoat, tai sä itket ja paastoat. No mikäs siinä auttoi, Jeshua paastosi. Ei edes pahanmakuista juurta tai pientä sirkkaa ollut saatavilla. Jeshua ei muka muista että Daavid oli pannut Bathshebaa. Schlomo oivaltaa pyytää viisautta ja saa oikeasta vastauxesta 10p ja papukaijamerkin. Tuttuja kuluneita meemejä.
ellauri184.html on line 250: According to the biblical chronicle, the Tribe of Manasseh was a part of a loose confederation of Israelite tribes from after the conquest of the land by Joshua until the formation of the first Kingdom of Israel in c. 1050 BC. No central government existed, and in times of crisis the people were led by ad hoc leaders known as Judges (see Book of Judges). With the growth of the threat from Palestinian (sorry) Philistine incursions, the Israelite tribes decided to form a strong centralised monarchy to meet the challenge, and the Tribe of Manasseh joined the new kingdom with Saul as the first king. After the death of Saul, all the tribes other than Judah remained loyal to the House of Saul, but after the death of Ish-bosheth, Saul's son who succeeded him to the throne of Israel, the Tribe of Manasseh joined the other northern Israelite tribes in making Judah's king David the king of a re-united Kingdom of Israel. However, on the accession of David's grandson Rehoboam, in c. 930 BC the northern tribes split from the House of David and from Saul's tribe Benjamin to reform Israel as the Northern Kingdom. Manasseh was a member of the Northern Kingdom until the kingdom was conquered by Assyria in c. 723 BC and the population deported. From that time, the Tribe of Manasseh has been counted as one of the ten lost tribes of Israel.
ellauri184.html on line 412: Isä meidän (David-coveri Aikakirjoista 29:10–18)
ellauri184.html on line 644: The fact that Jesus had been preaching God’s word was irrelevant to Pilate. Sitähän ne liuhuparrat myötäänsä tekevät. The term “Messiah” which Jesus had been using, was more threatening to Pilate as it was laden with political connotations. The term presupposed that the “big king" (God) would make his reign prevail via a small king (Messiah), who had yet to appear. The only thing that remained unclear was exactly who this “small king" would be (a descendant of David’s?) and under what circumstances he would appear.
ellauri185.html on line 66: According to Jewish tradition, the book was written by Samuel, with additions by the prophets Gad and Nathan, who together are three prophets who had appeared within 1 Chronicles during the account of David's reign. Modern scholarly thinking posits that the entire Deuteronomistic history was composed circa 630–540 BCE by combining a number of independent texts of various ages.
ellauri185.html on line 68: Mitäs tapahtui samaan aikaan toisaalla? Kreikassa 600-500-luvulla eKr Solon ym arkista puuhastelua. Sisämerten kolonisointia kilpaa Foinikian kaa. Millonkas se Iisebelin Tyros lytättiin? Jezebel esiintyy 800-luvulla, jälkeen Salomonin 970–931 BCE. Daavid osti tontin jolle Salomo rakensi ekan temppelin. Temppeli hävitettiin 589-587 Nebukadnesarin toimesta ja taparikolliset vietiin tällä kertaa Babylonin linnaan 597-539. Hizi kun olisi se seinätaulu jossa on raamatun tapahtumat aikajanalla. Millos se Moosexen konvoi palas Ebyktistä? Joidenkin Raamatun pohjalta tehtyjen laskujen mukaan israelilaiset palasivat Egyptistä noin 1300–1200 eaa. He joutuivat sotaan filistealaisia ja kanaanilaisia kanssa valloittaen Ain, Jerikon ja Hazorin. Arkeologien mukaan Jeriko ja Ai tuhoutuivat noin 1550 eaa. keskipronssikauden lopussa. Monien tutkijoiden mukaan Egyptissä kävi vain pieni joukko, ja israelilaiset olivat eräänlainen Kanaanin maan alakulttuuri, joka eli paimentolaisina maassa, jossa kaupunkilaiset palvoivat muun muassa israelilaisten uskovaisten epäjumalina pitämiä Baalia ja Astartea. Eräässä vaiheessa nämä paimentolaisheimot alkoivat vallata Israelia. Israelilaiset voittivat viimeiset kanaanilaiset noin 1140 eaa. David Rohlin kiistanalaisen revisioidun kronologian mukaan Jerikon ja Ain tuhoutuminen osuu samaan aikaan israelilaisten Egyptistä-paluun kanssa, ja Raamatun kertomus on mahdollinen kuvaus tapahtumista.
ellauri185.html on line 73: King Hiram I of Tyre allied himself with David and Solomon in 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 1 Chronicles. Hiram provided architects, workmen, cedar wood, and gold to build Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem.
ellauri185.html on line 97: The book begins with Samuel's birth and Yahweh's call to him as a boy. The story of the Ark of the Covenant follows. It tells of Israel's oppression by the Philistines, which brought about Samuel's anointing of Saul as Israel's first king. But Saul proved unworthy, and God's choice turned to David, who defeated Israel's enemies, purchased the threshing floor where his son Solomon would build the First Temple, and brought the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem. Yahweh then promised David and his sucessors an everlasting dynasty.
ellauri185.html on line 116: Joonatan oli Daavidin poikaystävä. Daavid oli kyllä kaikkiruokainen, kuten Batshebaselkkaus todistaa.
ellauri185.html on line 118: God tells Samuel to anoint David of Bethlehem as king, and David enters Saul's court as his armor-bearer and harpist. Saul's son and heir Jonathan befriends David and recognizes him as the rightful king. Saul then plots David's death, but David flees into the wilderness where he becomes a champion of the Hebrews. David joins the Philistines, but he continues to secretly champion his own people until Saul and Jonathan are killed in battle at Mount Gilboa.
ellauri185.html on line 120: avid_och_Saul.JPG/220px-Ernst_Josephson._-_David_och_Saul.JPG" width="50%" />
ellauri185.html on line 121:
ellauri185.html on line 123: At this point, David offers a majestic eulogy, where he praises the bravery and magnificence of both his friend Jonathan and King Saul.
ellauri185.html on line 127: The elders of Judah anoint David as king, but in the north Saul's son Ish-bosheth, or Ishbaal, rules over the northern tribes. After a long war, Ishbaal is murdered by Rechab and Baanah, two of his captains who hope for a reward from David. But David has them killed for killing God's anointed. David is then anointed king of all Israel.
ellauri185.html on line 131: David captures Jerusalem and brings the Ark there. David wishes to build a temple, but Nathan tells him that one of his sons will be the one to build the temple. David defeats the enemies of Israel, slaughtering Philistines, Moabites, Edomites, Syrians, and Arameans.
ellauri185.html on line 135: David commits adultery with Bathsheba, who becomes pregnant. When her husband Uriah the Hittite returns from battle, David encourages him to go home and see his wife (to cover his own tracks) but Uriah declines in case David might need him. David then deliberately sends Uriah on a suicide mission, and for this, Yahweh sends disasters against David's house. Nathan tells David that the sword shall never depart from his house.
ellauri185.html on line 137: For the remainder of David's reign, problems occur. Amnon (one of David's sons) rapes his half-sister Tamar (one of David's daughters). Absalom (another son of David) kills Amnon and rebels against his father, whereupon David flees from Jerusalem. Absalom is killed following the Battle of the Wood of Ephraim, and David is restored as king and returns to his palace. Finally, only two contenders for the succession remain: Adonijah, son of David and Haggith, and Solomon, son of David and Bathsheba.
ellauri185.html on line 141: 2 Samuel concludes with four chapters (chapters 21 to 24) that lie outside the chronological succession narrative of Saul and David, a narrative that will continue in The Book of Kings. These four supplementary chapters cover a great famine during David's reign; the execution of seven of Saul's remaining descendants, only Mephibosheth being saved (kannattiko mainita), David's song of thanksgiving, which is almost identical to Psalm 18; David's last words; a list of David's "mighty warriors"; an offering made by David using water from the well of Bethlehem; David's sinful census; a plague over Israel which David opted for as preferable to either famine or oppression; and the construction of an altar on land David purchased from Araunah the Jebusite.
ellauri185.html on line 147: The chronological narrative of succession resumes in the first Book of Kings, which relates how, as David lies dying, Bathsheba and Nathan ensure Solomon's elevation to the throne.
ellauri185.html on line 149: David valehteli sekä pystyssä että pitkällään, nubiileja neitosia kuumavesipullona ja painopeittona.
ellauri185.html on line 150: Valehteli neitosille suut silmät täyteen vielä kuolinvuoteellaan, oli se sevverran paska mies. David Nashin esi-isä varasti silkkiliinan ja deportoitiin Australiaan. David Pesetsky toi meille tuliaisixi Vana Tallinn liköörin ja vei sen mennessään seuraaville isännille.
ellauri185.html on line 809: In II Sam. 24:15, God sends a pestilence that kills 70,000 Israelites because of David’s ill-conceived census. Jesus says in Luke 21:11 that there will be plagues. Both Ezekiel and Jeremiah speak of God sending plagues, for example, in Ezek.
ellauri191.html on line 2152: From 1901 to 1912, the committee, headed by the conservative Carl David af Wirsén, weighed the literary quality of a work against its contribution towards humanity's struggle 'toward the ideal'. Leo Tolstoy, Henrik Ibsen, Émile Zola, and Mark Twain were rejected in favour of authors little read today. The choice of philosopher Rudolf Eucken as Nobel laureate in 1908 is widely considered to be one of the worst mistakes in the history of the Nobel Prize in Literature. The main candidates for the prize that year were poet Algernon Swinburne and author Selma Lagerlöf, but the Academy were divided between the candidates and, as a compromise, Eucken, representative of the Academy's interpretation of Nobel's "ideal direction", was launched as an alternative candidate that could be agreed upon. Solzhenitsyn did not accept the award and prize money until 10 December 1974, after he was deported from the Soviet Union. Swedish Academy member Artur Lundkvist had argued that the Nobel Prize in Literature should not become a political prize and questioned the artistic value of Solzhenitsyn's work. The award to Camilo José Cela was controversial as he had moved voluntarily from Madrid to Galicia during the Spanish Civil War in order to join Franco's rebel forces there as a volunteer.A member of the Swedish Academy, Knut Ahnlund, who had not played an important role in the Academy since 1996, protested against the choice of the 2004 laureate, Elfriede Jelinek; Ahnlund resigned, alleging that selecting Jelinek had caused "irreparable damage" to the reputation of the award.
ellauri192.html on line 455: David Malouf 100/1
ellauri194.html on line 894: David Barrott:
ellauri196.html on line 751: That David played, and it pleased the Lord
ellauri198.html on line 831: His several boring plays featured fictional heroic ancient Irish warrior Cuchulain. A later poem concludes with a brash announcement: “There’s more enterprise in walking naked.” This indecent departure from a conventional 19th-century manner disappointed his contemporary readers, who preferred the pleasant musicality of such familiar poems as “The Lake Isle of Innisfree,” which he wrote in 1890. "I think all happiness depends on the energy to assume the mask of some other person, on strutting as somebody else but yourself", he said. Yeats and his lamentable wife held more than 400 sessions of automatic writing, producing nearly 4,000 pages that Yeats avidly and patiently studied and organized. What an idiot.
ellauri203.html on line 648: Martin, a respected doctor (huoh), his wife Karin, Karin's seventeen year old brother Minus, and widowed father David of Karin and Minus' have convened at the family's summer home on an island off the coast of Sweden to celebrate David's return from the Swiss Alps, where he was substantially completing his latest novel (huoh). The family has long lived a fantasy of they being a loving one, David's extended absences which are the cause of many of the family's problems. Without that parental guidance, Minus is at a confused and vulnerable stage of his life where he is a bundle of repressed emotions, most specifically concerning not feeling loved by his father and concerning the opposite sex (huoh). He is attracted to females as a collective but does not know how to handle blatant female sexuality, especially if it is directed his way. A month earlier Karin was released from a mental institution (huoh). Her doctor has told Martin that the likelihood that she will fully recover from her illness is low, her ultimate fate being that her mental state will disintegrate totally, although she has functioned well since her release. In his love for her, Martin has vowed to himself to see her through whatever she faces. As Karin begins to lose grip on reality, Minus is the one most directly affected, although it does bring out the issues all the men are facing with regard to their interrelationships.
ellauri203.html on line 652: In a small family island, Karin, her teenage brother Minus and her husband Martin welcome her father David, who is a writer permanently absent traveling around the world. Karin has just left a mental institution and has inherited the incurable insanity from her mother. Minus feels lost and alone, estranged by his selfish and cold father that left Karin and he (sic) behind after the death of his wife. Martin is neglected by Karin and has no sex life with her anymore and spends his time taking care of his wife. When Karin finds the journal of her father hidden in a drawer in his desk, she reads that her degenerative disease is incurable and triggers a breakdown.
ellauri203.html on line 656: Karin is trying to readjust to life with her family after her release from a mental institution. Her husband Martin is patient with her as she experiences the highs and lows of life. Both she and her younger brother Minus have issues with their father David, who is visiting. Martin is a well-known author who travels frequently and is estranged from his children. He´s about to publish his latest effort and spends much of his time alone, finalizing the manuscript before submitting it t the publishers. After having sex with Minus she realizes she is unable to live in two worlds and must choose between institutionalization and home life.
ellauri203.html on line 660: On an island, Karin, a recently released mentally sick young woman, is spending her vacation with her husband Martin, a doctor, her father David, a writer just back from Switzerland, and her younger brother Fredrick (Minus). Karin is suffering from hallucinations and hysteria. She thinks she is kroppsvisited by God - muze olikin vaan kiimainen Miisu, siis Miinus. Huoh.
ellauri206.html on line 252: IL fréquente le salon de Charles Buet, où il rencontre Jules Barbey d'Aurevilly, Joris-Karl Huysmans, François Coppée, Léon Bloy, Laurent Tailhade et autres cretins. Il rencontre Edmond de Goncourt, avec qui il restera lié jusqu'à la mort de ce dernier en 1896, et qui fut son principal protecteur. Edmond de Goncourt, dans la récente édition complète en 22 volumes du Journal des Goncourt, se montre curieux de toutes les questions sexuelles et particulièrement de l'homophilie. À partir de 1884, Edmond de Goncourt, jusque-là banalement réactionnaire, devient un antisémite enragé, Jésus l'a sauvé après 27 années d'homosexualité. Il se veut esthète et dandy en même temps qu'explorateur tapageux du vice et de la vulgarité, curieux assemblage qui verse souvent dans le pire mauvais goût, et qui lui vaut le mépris hautain de Robert de Montesquiou, dont Lorrain, pour sa part, fait volontiers sa tête de Turc pour sa prétention à l'élégance et à la chasteté. « Lorrain », écrit Léon Daudet dans ses Souvenirs, « avait une tête poupine et large à la fois de coiffeur vicieux, les cheveux partagés par une raie parfumée au patchouli, des yeux globuleux, ébahis et avides, de grosses lèvres qui jutaient, giclaient et coulaient pendant son discours. Son torse était bombé comme le bréchet de certains oiseaux charognards. Lui se nourrissait avidement de toutes les calomnies et immondices. »
ellauri207.html on line 143: David Duchovny 2x
ellauri207.html on line 182: Catherine Zeta-Jones was born on 25 September 1969 in Swansea, Wales, to David Jones, the owner of a sweet factory, and his wife Patricia (née Fair), a seamstress. Her father is Welsh and her mother is of Irish Catholic descent. She was named after her grandmother, Zeta Jones (whose name was derived from the name of a ship that her great-grandfather once sailed on), because 'Just Jones' would not cut the cheese in showbiz. Zeta-Jones was raised in the suburban area of Mumbles.Her struggle with depression and bipolar II disorder has been well documented by the media, for she is married to sex addicted actor Michael Douglas, son of Kirk, whose name used to be Issur Danielovitch Demsky. Michael is 25 years her senior but a wizard with cunnilingus.
ellauri210.html on line 471:

Jakob van Hoddis, Davidin tähti

ellauri210.html on line 473: Hans Davidsohn (Kunstlername Jakob van Hoddis; * 16. Mai 1887 in Berlin; † 1942 in Sobibór, Generalgouvernement) war ein deutscher Dichter des literarischen Expressionismus. Er ist besonders bekannt für das Gedicht Weltende.
ellauri210.html on line 489: Hans Davidsohn war der Sohn des jüdischen Sanitätsrats Hermann Davidsohn und dessen Ehefrau Doris geb. Kempner. Er wurde am Grüner Weg 69 (heute Singerstraße in Berlin-Friedrichshain) geboren. Sein Zwillingsbruder starb während der Geburt. Er war der älteste Sohn und wuchs mit seinen Geschwistern Marie, Anna, Ludwig und Ernst auf. Die Lyrikerin Friederike Kempner war seine Großtante.
ellauri210.html on line 495: Als sein Vater 1909 starb, legte er sich das Pseudonym Jakob van Hoddis zu, wobei van Hoddis ein Anagramm seines Nachnamens Davidsohn ist. Von Freunden wurde er oft „Hans den Hoddissohn“ oder „Hoddiskop“ verspottet.
ellauri210.html on line 1173: Three days before his death, he said calmly to a friend: "I am allergic to this planet". He wrote his final book in 1959 and upon completion, he asked his wife to send the manuscript to Breton. When she returned from the post office, she found him dead; he had hanged himself on the main beam of his studio. Another exit in the style of David Foster Wallace. Did he give a damn to how his wife might have taken it? Well maybe she was relieved. Asta is allergic to Miryam's kitty Chico but bears it, taking antihistamines. When she has had a bad day, she curls up in her room with Kitty in her lap.
ellauri213.html on line 311: The Sun ceased publishing topless Page 3 images in its Republic of Ireland edition in 2013, in its UK editions in 2015, and on its Page3.com website in 2017. The Daily Star also ceased publishing images of topless glamour models in 2019. However, these decisions were not necessarily a direct result of the No More Page 3 campaign. The then official photographer for Page 3, Alison Webster, also criticised the campaign, saying "people should be able to make their own choices". Prime Minister David Cameron replied, "I think on this one I think it is probably better to leave it to the consumer."
ellauri213.html on line 434: Seuraavassa on listattuna pahoja naisia rikkomuxineen (kuvissa söpöset alleviivattu): Irma Grese (Naziwächterin), Myra Hindley (serial pedocide), Isabela of Castile (born in the year 1451 and died in 1504, Isabella the Catholic, was queen of Castile and León. She and her husband, Ferdinand II of Aragon, brought stability to the kingdoms that became the basis for the unification of Spain. Isabella and Ferdinand are known for completing the Reconquista, ordering conversion or exile of their Muslim and Jewish subjects and financing Christopher Columbus’ 1492 voyage that led to the opening of the “New World”. Isabella was granted the title Servant of God by the Catholic Church in 1974), Beverly Allitt (pedocide, Angel of Death), Queen Mary of England (catholic), Belle Gunness (norwegian-american serial killer), Mary Ann Cotton (serial killer), Ilse Koch (Lagerfrau), Katherine Knight (very bad Aussie), Elizabeth Bathory (hungarian noblewoman and serial killer), Sandra Avila Beltran (drugs), Patty Hearst (hänen isoisänsä oli lehtikeisari William Randolph Hearst. Hiän joutui kidnappauksen uhriksi, mutta pian tämän jälkeen hiän teki pankkiryöstön ja joutui vankilaan), Genene Jones (infanticide nurse), Karla Homolka (Canadian serial killer), Diane Downs (infanticide), Aileen Wuornos (serial killer), Griselda Blanco (drug lady), Lizzie Borden (kirvesmurhaaja), Bonnie Parker (bank robber), Anne Bonny (pirate), Mary Bell (pedocide), Delphine LaLaurie (serial slavekiller), Patricia Krenwinkel (Manson family member), Leslie van Houten (Manson family member), Darlie Routier (infanticide), Susan Smith (infanticide), Susan Atkins (Manson family member), Ching Shih (pirate), Anna Sorokin Delvey (con woman), Amelia Dyer (serial killer), Assata Shakur (black terrorist), Belle Gunness (serial killer), Gypsy Rose Blanchard (matricide), Pamela Smart (mariticide), Ruth Ellis (nightclub hostess, last woman hanged in UK), Phoolan Devi (bandit), Ma Barker (matriarch), Jennifer Pan (parenticide), Virginia Hill (gangster), Karla Faye Tucker (burglar, first woman injected in US), Leonarda Cianciully (serial murderer, soapmaker), Mary Read, avidbrocourt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Caril-Ann-Fugate-3-e1549989521558.jpg">Carill Ann Fugate (murder spree), Grace Marks (maid), Belle Starr (outlaw, friend of Lucky Luke), Zerelda Mimms (Mrs. Jesse James), Jane Toppan (serial killer), Sara Jane Moore (wannabe assassin of Gerald Ford), Martha Beck (serial killer), Doris Payne (jewel thief), Mary Brunner (Manson family member), Barbara Graham (executed by gas), Grace O'Malley (pirate), Sada Abe (jealous geisha. When they asked why she had killed Ishida, “Immediately she became excited and her eyes sparkled in a strange way: ‘I loved him so much, I wanted him all to myself. But since we were not husband and wife, as long as he lived he could be embraced by other women. I knew that if I killed him no other woman could ever touch him again, so I killed him…..’ ), Samantha Lewthwaite (white somali terrorist), Theresa Knorr (murderess), Lynette Fromme (Manson family, wannabe assassin of Gerald Ford), The Freeway Phantom (serial killer), Carol M. Bundy (serial killer), Fanny Kaplan (bolshevik revolutionary), Marguerite Alibert (Ed VII courtesan), Jean Harris (author), Linda Hazzard (physician, serial killer), Mary Jane Kelly (1st victim of Jack the Ripper), Kim Hyon-hui (North-Korean spy), Vera Renczi (serial killer), Clare Bronfman (filthy rich criminal), Kirsten Gilbert (serial killer nurse), Gerda Steinhoff (Lagerwächterin), Linda Carty (baby robber), Estella Marie Thompson (black prostitute, blowjobbed Hugh Grant), Elizabeth Becker (Lagerwächterin), Juana Barraza (asesina en serie), Olivera Circovic (baseball player, writer, jewel thief), Olga Hepnarova (mental serial killer), Sabina Eriksson (knäpp tvilling), Minnie Dean (serial killer), Madame de Brinvilliers (aristocrat parri- and fratricide), Martha Rendell (familicide, last woman hanged in Western Australia), Violet Gibson (wannabe assassin of Mussolini), Idoia López Riaño (terrorist), Styllou Christofi (murdered her daughter in law), Mary Eastley (convicted of witchcraft), Wanda Klaff (Lagerwächterin), Giulia Tofana (avvelenatrice), Tisiphone (1/3 raivottaresta), Jean Lee (murderer for money), Brigitte Mohnhaupt (RAF terrorist), Marcia (mistress of Commodus), Beate Zschäpe (far-right terrorist), Evelyn Frechette (singer, Dillingerin heila), Francoise Dior (naziaktivisti), Linda Mulhall (nirhasi äidin poikaystävän saxilla), Brigit Hogefeld (RAF terrorist), Martha Corey (Salem witchhunt victim), Marie Lafarge (arsenikkimurha), Debra Lafave (teacher, gave blow job to student), Enriqueta Marti (asasina en serie), Alse Young (witch hanging victim), Elizabeth Michael (actress, involuntary manslaughter: nasty boyfriend hit his head and died while beating her), Susannah Martin (witchcraft), Maria Mandl (Gefängnisoffizerin), Mary Frith (pickpocket and fence), Hanadi Jaradat (suicide bomber), Marie-Josephte Carrivau (mariticide), Gudrun Ensslin (RAF founder), Anna Anderson (vale-Anastasia), Ans van Dijk (jutku nazikollaboraattori), Elizabeth Holmes (bisneshuijari), Ghislaine Maxwell (Epsteinin haahka), Julianna Farrait (drugs), Yolanda Saldivar (embezzler, killer), Jodi Arias (convicted killer Jodi Ann Arias was born on July 9, 1980, in Salinas, California. In the summer of 2008, Arias made national headlines when she was charged with murdering her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander, a 30-year-old member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints who was working as a motivational speaker and insurance salesman. Aargh. Justifiable homicide.) Alyssa Bustamante (kid murder), Mary Kay Letourneau (kid abuser), Mirtha Young (drugs), Catherine Nevin (mariticide), Pilar Prades (maid), Irmgard Möller (terrorist), Christine Schürrer (krimi), Reem Riyashi (suicide bomber), Amy Fisher (jealous), Wafa Idris (suicide bomber), Jeanne de Clisson (ex-noblewoman), Christine Papin (maid murderer), Sally McNeil (body builder), Mariette Bosch (murderer), Sandra Ávila Beltrán (drugs), Alice Schwarzer (journalist), Andrea Yates (litter murderer), Mimi Wong (bar hostess), Pauline Nyiramasuhuko (criminal politician), Josefa Segovia (murderer), Martha Needle (serial killer), Antonina Makarova (war criminal), Mary Surratt (criminal businessperson), Dorothea Binz (officer), Leona Helmsley (tax evasion), Angela Rayola (reality tv personality), Léa Papin (maid murderer), Ursula Erikssson (kriminell mördare), Maria Petrovna (spree killer), Aafia Siddiqui (criminal), Fatima Bernawi (palestinian militant), La Voisin (fortune teller), Deniz Seki (singer), Rasmea Odeh (Arab activist), Hildegard Lächert (nurse), Sajida al-Rishawi (suicide bomber), Hayat Boumeddiene (ISIS groupie, nähty viimexi Al Holissa), Herta Ehlert (Lagerwächterin), Elizabeth Stride (seriös mördare), Adelheid Schulz (krimi), Jenny-Wanda Barkman (Wächter), Shi Jianqiao (pardoned assassin. The assassination of Sun Chuanfang was ethically justified as an act of filial piety and turned into a political symbol of the legitimate vengeance against the Japanese invaders.), Rosemary West (serial killer), Juana Bormann (Lagerwächterin), Kathy Boudin (criminal), Kate Webster (assassin), Teresa Lewis (murderer), Hermine Braunsteiner (Lagerwächterin), Flor Contemplacion (assassina), Constance Kent (fratricide), Tamara Samsonova (serial killer), Herta Bothe (Lagerwächterin), Maria Gruber (Mörderin), Irene Leidolf (möderin), Waltraud Wagner (Mörderin), Elaine Campione (criminelle), Greta Bösel (Pflegerin), Marie Manning (Mörderin), Darya Nikolayevna Saltykova (sadist), Nora Parham (executed), Maria Barbella (assassina), Linda Wenzel (ISIS activist), Anna Marie Hahn (Mörderin), Suzane von Richthofen (parenticide), Charlotte Mulhall (murderer), Khioniya Guseva (kriminal), Daisy de Melker (serial killer nurse), Stephanija Meyer (Mörderin), Sinedu Tadesse (murderer), Ayat al-Akhras (suicide bomber), Akosita Lavulavu (minister of infrastructure and tourism), Sabrina de Sousa (criminal diplomat), Sally Basset (poisoner), Emma Zimmer (Aufseher), Mary Clement (serial killer), Irina Gaidamachuk (serial killer), Dagmar Overbye (serialmorder), Gesche Gottfried (Mörderin), Frances Knorr (serial killer), Beate Schmidt (Serienmörderin), Elizabeth Clarke (accused victim of witchcraft), Kim Sun-ja (serial killer), Olga Konstantinovana Briscorn (serial killer), Roxana Baldetti (politico), Rizana Nafeek (house maid), Margaret Scott (accused of witchcraft), Jacqueline Sauvage (meurtrier), Veronique Courjault (tueur en série), Barbara Erni (thief), Hilde Lesewitz (Schutzstaffel Wächterin), Thenmoli Rajaratnam (suicide bomber), etc. etc..
ellauri214.html on line 263: P.P.S. Joku David Crane muikeilee rasvasta kiiltävä rapuliina kaulassa: aion syyttää Putinia sotarikoxesta. Tosin niihin on syyllistyneet vähävenäläisetkin mutta niitä ei lasketa. Olen kaatanut 1 presidentin, voin tehdä sen toistekin. Kyseessä oli Liberian presidentti, musta mies jolla oli joxeenkin pienet liperit. In 2017, Crane founded the Global Accountability Network to investigate international crimes in Syria, Yemen, Venezuela, and China. In 2022, his organization published a white paper titled "Russian War Crimes Against Ukraine: The Breach of International Humanitarian Law By The Russian Federation". Mustaa valkoisella. Heppu oli US Armyn rullissa 20v uran alussa. Ezellasta.
ellauri217.html on line 264: Trustee Kadri-Helena onkin varmaan se ketku jutku Ben Gurion tms joka sai atomipommin teko-ohjeen heimoveljiltä jenkeistä. Israel's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion was "nearly obsessed" with obtaining nuclear weapons to prevent the Holocaust from reoccurring. He stated, "What Einstein, Oppenheimer, and Teller, the three of them are Jews, made for the United States, could also be done by scientists in Israel, for their own people". Deborah Brand 3 Aug 2022 0 2:04 Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid said this week Israel has "other capabilities" against threats from Iran, in a rare allusion to the country's widely reported nuclear stockpile.
ellauri219.html on line 114:

David Livingstone (missionary/explorer)
ellauri219.html on line 324: From Bob Dylan (No.15) to David Bowie, Tom Waits to Steely Dan, Beat Generation author Burroughs has influenced many a songwriter over the decades. Less known is that, according to Burroughs himself, he witnessed Paul McCartney (No.64) working on “Eleanor Rigby.” As quoted in A Report From The Bunker, a collection of conversations with author Victor Bockris, Burroughs recalled McCartney putting him up in The Beatles’ flat on 34 Montagu Square: “I saw the song taking shape. Once again, not knowing much about music, I could see that he knew what he was doing.”
ellauri219.html on line 411:

44: Dr. David Livingstone

ellauri219.html on line 744: The yoga scholar David Gordon White writes that yoga teacher training often includes "mandatory instruction" in the Yoga Sutra. White calls this "curious to say the least", since the text is in his view essentially irrelevant to "yoga as it is taught and practiced today", commenting that the Yoga Sutra is "nearly devoid of discussion of indecent postures, dick stretching, and heavy breathing".
ellauri220.html on line 445: In the Bible, Adlai was a minor character, the father of one of King David's herdsmen. Adlai is a contracted form of the Hebrew name Adaliah.
ellauri221.html on line 73: The club’s name derives from its head waiter, Edward Poodle. Poodles quickly built up a prestigious reputation among London’s powerful and wealthy classes, and its membership reflected this, numbering numerous politicians and members of the British aristocracy. Members have included former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, John Perfumo (a politician who resigned after the notorious Perfumo affair scandal, whereby he was revealed as having an affair with 19-year-old model Helen Keller), philosopher David Hume, economist and philosopher Adam Smith, and author Ian Fleming, creator of the world’s most famous fictional spy, James Bond.
ellauri221.html on line 361: David Bowie kuoli 6 vuotta sitten 2016. Sen jäämistö saatiin äsken vasta siilatuxi. Olisi kannattanut Taavin tehdä kunnollinen kuolinsiivous.
ellauri222.html on line 92: LOS ANGELES—Born in Canada into an immigrant Jewish family in 1915, Nobel Prize-winning author Saul Bellow had a traditional Jewish upbringing, which included Torah study, Talmud, and Hebrew. Yet Rabbi David Wolpe observes that Bellow had an ambivalent relationship with Judaism.
ellauri222.html on line 131: “In college I behaved as though my career was to be a writer, and that guided me,” Bellow later said. There was also the fact that his principal interest was literature, and, until after the war, Jews were rarely hired by English departments. “You weren’t born to it” is the way the chairman of the department at Northwestern clarified the matter when Bellow inquired about graduate school. Leader thinks that this encounter “produced a lifelong antipathy, mild but real, to English departments.” It’s true that there was antipathy. But Bellow would have been interested in a university career only as a means to support his writing. Fiction was his calling. “He was focused, he was dedicated to becoming what he was, from the beginning,” David Peltz, Bellow’s oldest friend, told Leader. “I mean, he never veered.”
ellauri222.html on line 934: Pudottuaan parlamentista Clemenceau keskittyi journalismiin ja saavutti aseman arvostettuna ulkopolitiikan asiantuntijana kuten Carl Bildt ja Alex Stubb. Suuren sodan aikana entinen vasuristi käänsi kelkkansa ja muuttui oikislaisexi. Clemenceaun ajama kyyninen valtapolitiikka edusti rauhankonferenssissa vastavoimaa Yhdysvaltain presidentti Woodrow Wilsonin edustamalle pehmyröinnille. Myös Britannian pääministeri David Lloyd George piti Clemenceaun linjaa epäviisaana, koska Saksan liian ankara kohtelu voisi nostattaa siellä naziliikehdintää. Clemenceau "hyväksyi kompromissina" Saarinmaan erottamisen Saksasta 15 vuodeksi, Reininmaan miehityksen 15 vuodeksi ja sen pysyvän demilitarisoinnin sekä suurten sotakorvausten määräämisen Saksan maksettaviksi, mutta hän piti Versailles’n rauhansopimuksen lopullista sisältöä sittenkin liian pehmeänä Saksalle. Ihan vittuiluxi hän vaati, että Saksan valtuuskunnan oli allekirjoitettava sopimus samassa Versailles’n palatsin peilisalissa, jossa Saksan keisarikunta oli julistettu perustetuksi vuonna 1871. Anarkisti Émile Cottin yritti salamurhata Clemenceaun ampumalla rauhankonferenssin aikana 19. helmikuuta 1919. Harmi ettei osunut. Carramba! Viele vehen vasemmalle!
ellauri226.html on line 122: There was a David Herbert Lawrence plaque on the street. Inside the tiny station were two more. It seemed a lot of plaques for a guy who spent one night there. “Blessed is he that expecteth nothing,” he wrote of Sorgono, “for he shall not be disappointed.” More Niente. “A dreary hole!” Lawrence muttered. “A cold, hopeless, lifeless, Saturday afternoon-weary village.” The food was bad. The bedsheets were stained. People cheerfully relieved themselves on the street. What limp parsnips too! “Why are you so indignant?” the Q.B. asked. “It’s all life.”
ellauri238.html on line 860: Layle Silbert Yehuda Amichai (1924-2000) is recognized as one of Israel´s finest poets. His poems, written in Hebrew, have been translated into 40 languages (2 more than Herbert), and entire volumes of his work have been published in English, French, German, Swedish, Spanish, and Catalan. “Yehuda Amichai, it has been remarked with some justice,” according to translator Robert Alter, “is the most widely translated Hebrew poet since King David.” But boy, has he a long way to go to beat Dave.
ellauri240.html on line 105: Bullshit artist David B. Miller designed Krueger's disfigured face based on photographs of burn victims obtained from the UCLA Medical Center. The film was inspired by several newspaper articles printed in the Los Angeles Times in the 1970s about Hmong refugees, who, after fleeing to the United States because of U.S. war and genocide in Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam, suffered disturbing nightmares and refused to sleep. Some of the men died in their sleep soon after. Medical authorities called the phenomenon Asian Death Syndrome.
ellauri243.html on line 124: Dale Brown oli Amerikan paras militaristikynäilijä 2010-luvulla. Hauska nähdä vaihteexi miten pahisten kantapeikkojen juoni onnistuu without a glitch, ja tyhmät CIA ja FBI äijät niitetään lakoon kuin timoteit. We serve the true republic, not the false democracy. When were the good and brave ever in the majority, asks Henry David Thoreau. Never, answers Frans de Waal, for the majority is just apes like us.
ellauri243.html on line 239: lukien Justin Timberlake, Eric Dane ja David Arquette. Mutta vain yksi
ellauri243.html on line 243: celebs including Justin Timberlake, Eric Dane and David Arquette. But only
ellauri243.html on line 249: years, David Bugliari. Wolf married The Real World: New Orleans alum Kelley
ellauri243.html on line 581: "Herra on puhunut" oli prof. Aamoksen suosikki. Aamos päättää profetiakirjansa viimeiseen näkyyn Herrasta, joka seisoo alttarin vieressä ja käskee tuhota temppelin ja tappaa kaikki ihmiset. Tuomion sanoma - jota opetetaan koko kirjassa - saavuttaa huipentuman tässä viimeisessä luvussa. Pakotietä ei ole. Kaikki, jotka hylkäsivät Herran, tuhotaan. sanoo Herra, sinun Jumalasi. Herra on puhunut. Ugh. (Hyi.) Aamos päättää ankaran tuomion kirjansa tähän viimeiseen toivon sanomaan. Daavidin dynastia palautetaan kirkkaudella ja hän näyttää Herran muille kansoille. Heidän satonsa on runsasta, heidän kaupunkinsa asutetaan uudelleen ja he korjaavat palkkionsa rauhassa. Jumala istuttaa heidät heidän maalleen, jotta he eivät enää koskaan kärsisi menetyksiä. Huomaa, että nämä Aamoksen lupaukset ovat vielä edessä. Herran suu on puhunut (Jes. 1:20, käärien sen:) "Hän täyttää vielä sinun suusi naurulla" (Job 8:21)
ellauri243.html on line 600:

Military Wiki David J. Mahoney Quote

ellauri243.html on line 604: avid-j-mahoney.webp?s=612x612&w=gi&k=20&c=FPnUk0_QqSb2rrI4aFQ2RocgBoyb_HuhUYd8odGz9qg=" />
ellauri243.html on line 606: NEW YORK, NY - MARCH 8: David J. Mahoney and his wife, Hildegarde "Hillie" Merrill Mahoney, are photographed at 'Night of 100 Stars' event March 8, 1982 in New York City. Mr. Mahoney is the chairman of the Norton Simon conglomerate which includes Hunt´s ketchup, Max Factor´s cosmetics, and Johnnie Walker´s Scotch.
ellauri243.html on line 610: David Joseph Mahoney Jr. (May 17, 1923 – May 1, 2000) was an American business leader, philanthropist and author. He joined a passionate community of people who love what you love.
ellauri243.html on line 611: His father, David Mahoney Sr., was an Irish immigrant construction crane operator in Bronx. Mahoney´s mother, Loretta Cahill, was a telephone operator with New York Bell.
ellauri243.html on line 613: In 1951 he went into business forming an advertising agency, David J. Mahoney, Inc. The company managed advertising for eight companies, including Exzema, White Rock and Good Humor. Mahoney sold his agency in 1956 and became President of Good Humor, and became President of Canada Dry in 1966.
ellauri243.html on line 667: Pahrumpassa asui joku libertariaani joka on onnexi jo kuollut keuhkoemboliaan.

Libertarian Party (LP) on poliittinen puolue Yhdysvalloissa, aika lailla Liike Nytin tapainen, joka edistää kansalaisvapauksia, interventiokyvyttömyyttä, laissez-faire -kapitalismia sekä hallituksen koon ja laajuuden rajoittamista. Puolue syntyi elokuussa 1971 tapaamisissa David F. Nolanin kotona Westminsterissä, Coloradossa, ja se perustettiin virallisesti 11. joulukuuta 1971 Colorado Springsissä, Coloradossa. Juhlien järjestäjät saivat inspiraatiota itävaltalaisen koulukunnan töistä ja ideoista, varsinkin ekonomisti Murray Rothbard. Rothbard väitti, että kaikki "yritysvaltion monopolijärjestelmän" tarjoamat palvelut voitaisiin tarjota tehokkaammin yksityisen sektorin toimesta ja kirjoitti, että valtio on "ryöstöorganisaatio, joka on systematisoitu ja kirjattu laajalle". Hänen suojelijansa Hans Herman Hopen mukaan ilman Rotberttiä ei olisi sanottavaa anarkokapitalistiliikettä. Hans-Hermann Hoppe ( / ˈh ɒ p ə / ; saksaksi: [ˈhɔpə] ; syntynyt 2. syyskuuta 1949) on saksalais-amerikkalainen itävaltalaisen koulukunnan taloustieteilijä , filosofi ja poliittinen teoreetikko. Hän on taloustieteen emeritusprofessori Nevadan yliopistossa Pahrumpassa (UNLV), Ludwig von Mises Instituten vanhustutkija sekä Property and Freedom Societyn perustaja ja puheenjohtaja. Hoppe on Kristina tädin ikätoveri. Hoppe on väkevästi antidemokraattinen. Sen kaveri Lew Rockwell on vahvasti Ukrainan sodan vastainen.
ellauri244.html on line 60: Dan Steinbokin panokohtauxet ovat jopa poikkeuksellisenkin etovia. Voi elävästi kuvitella Danin ähkivän tuppikulleineen jonkun naisen sisällä kuin luttaperse herra Markkula. Tiheä ja armoton jännäri koovee terrorismista. Siinä välissä takaumia Danin nuoruusmuistoista Helsingin juutalaisessa koulussa. Tollanen mielenmaisema syntyy Danin perhe- ja heimotaustalla. Jehovan porukoissa ei juuri pyydetä eikä anneta armoa. Ei muuta kun vaan verikostoa 3.-4. polveen. Näillä harjoilla peräreikäpetterit David ja Joonatan taistelivat palestiinalaisia vastaan. Davidilla oli tää pulloharja ja Joonatan käytti hammasväliharjaa.
ellauri246.html on line 234:       No Psalms of David now the silence break, Taavetin virret ei sieltä kajahda,
ellauri246.html on line 366: David Leanin ohjaama elokuva Tohtori Živago valmistui 1965. Sen käsikirjoituksen laati Pasternakin romaanin pohjalta Robert Bolt. Robert Frost jäi nuolemaan näppejään. Samaan aikaan Joseph alkaa opiskella englantia ja puolaa itsenäisesti.
ellauri247.html on line 199: Charles Dickens's David Copperfield mentions that his young protagonist counted Smollett's works among his favourites as a child.
ellauri247.html on line 337: With the widow's money, Johnson opened Edial Hall School as a private academy at Edial, near Lichfield. He had only three pupils: Lawrence Offley, George Garrick, and the 18-year-old David Garrick, who later became one of the most famous actors of his day. The venture was unsuccessful and cost Tetty a substantial portion of her fortune. Instead of trying to keep the failing school going, Johnson began to write his first major work, the historical tragedy Irene. Biographer Robert DeMaria believed that Tourette syndrome likely made public occupations like schoolmaster or tutor almost impossible for Johnson. This may have led Johnson to "the invisible occupation of authorship".
ellauri254.html on line 76: Vinzenz: David Ferdinand Koreff.
ellauri254.html on line 651: Lev Davidovitš Trotski (ven. Лев Давидович Троцкий; alkuaan ven. Лев Давидович Бронштейн, Lev Davidovitš Bronštein, 7. marraskuuta (J: 26. lokakuuta) 1879 Janovka, Hersonin kuvernementti, Venäjän keisarikunta – 21. elokuuta 1940 Coyoacán, México, Meksiko) oli merkittävä bolševikkivallankumouksellinen ja marxismin teoreetikko. Trotski kuului Neuvostoliiton ja Kominternin perustajiin, ja häntä pidetään puna-armeijan luojana, mutta hän joutui vuonna 1929 maanpakoon hävittyään valtataistelun Josif Stalinin kanssa. NKVD:n agentti Ramón Mercader murhasi Trotskin Meksikossa 1940.
ellauri254.html on line 653: Lev Bronstein syntyi juutalaiseen perheeseen Etelä-Venäjällä, nykyisessä Ukrainassa 26. lokakuuta (7. marraskuuta uuden luvun mukaan) 1879. Hänen isänsä David Bronstein oli varakas venäjänjuutalainen maanviljelijä. Levin sisko Olga tuli myöhemmin tunnetuksi bolševikkipoliitikkona ja Trotskin kilpailijan Lev Kamenevin vaimona. Perhe ei ollut kovinkaan uskonnollinen. Bronšteinit puhuivat kotonaan venäjää ja ukrainaa, ja Lev itse sujuvasti lisäksi hepreaa, saksaa, englantia, ranskaa ja espanjaa.
ellauri254.html on line 785: Käsite sosialistinen realismi otettiin käyttöön Neuvostoliiton kirjailijaliiton liittokokouksessa vuonna 1934, jonka jälkeen siitä tuli maan virallinen ja ainoa hyväksytty taidesuuntaus. Sen isänä mainitaan usein kirjailija Maksim Gorki, jonka romaania Äiti (1907, suom. 1944) pidetään sosialistisen realismin perusmuotona. Esikuvina on pidetty myös eräiden 1800-luvun realistien, esimerkiksi peredvižnikien (”Vaeltajat”), Jacques-Louis Davidin ja Ilja Repinin taidetta.
ellauri256.html on line 342: Majakovski tempautui keskikoululaisena mukaan kumoukselliseen teiniliikkeeseen, jolla oli vahva kannatus hänen kotikaupungissaan Georgiassa. Vuonna 1906 perhe muutti Moskovaan, jossa hänestä tuli taideakatemian oppilas. Vuonna 1908 hän liittyi sosiaalidemokraattiseen puolueeseen. Kumouksellisen toiminnan takia hänet vangittiin kolme kertaa ja hän oli eristyssellissä yhteensä 11 kuukautta. Tuon ajan hän käytti marxilaisuuden opiskeluun ja venäläisen kirjallisuuden lukemiseen. Mitähän sekin siitä tajusi. Vapauduttaan hän tutustui runoilija David Burljukiin, joka johdatti hänet futuristiseen aatteeseen. He muodostivat aluksi niin sanotun kubofuturistisen terroristisolun. He halusivat murskata porvarillisen taiteen vakinntuneet normit ja vihasivat muutoinkin porvaristoa. Silti vain Majakovski oli selvästi sosialismin kannattaja, Burljuk oli salaporvari joka muuttikin sittemmin New Yorkiin.
ellauri257.html on line 116: Juutalainen Felix Dreizin ja David Guaspari kirjassaan The Russian Soul and the Jew: Essays in Literary Ethnocentrism käsittelevät antisemitismiä ja osoittavat Gogolin kiintymyksen "Venäjän ja Ukrainan kulttuurissa vallitseviin juutalaisvastaisiin ennakkoluuloihin". Léon Poliakovin teoksessa " Antisemitismin historia " kirjoittaja toteaa, että " Taras Bulban "Jankelista" tuli todellakin venäläisen kirjallisuuden arkkityyppinen juutalainen. Gogol maalasi hänet äärimmäisen hyväksikäyttöiseksi, pelkurimaiseksi ja vastenmieliseksi, vaikkakin kykeneväksi olemaan kiitollinen vähästäkin. " Taras Bulbassa on kohtaus jossa juutalaiset heitetään jokeen, kohtaus, jossa Taras Bulba vierailee juutalaisten luona ja pyytää heidän apuaan, sekä kertojan viittaus siihen, että juutalaisia ​​kohdellaan yleisinhimillisesti eli varsin kehnosti.
ellauri257.html on line 445: No siinä kävi sitte niin että paxu Waclav kävi puikkaamassa Siemianin ja Karol puikotti epähuomiossa Waclavin. Mut hetkinen Retuko sitten puikotti Joosefin? Vizi mäen ymmärrä näitä murhavideoiden juonia. Ne on sitten sekavia, ja sitäpaizi täysin epäkiinnostavia. Aivan sama kuka tuikkaa ketäkin. Mitä vähemmän jää pystyapinoita pystyyn sen parempi. KONEC. The End. Olipa paska kyhhäys homolta pedofiilitä.
ellauri258.html on line 126: Sivumennen sanoen, "dignity" on oikeistolainen ällösana, jota on suomittu jo useassa albumissa, erit. Tsihirunkkuṟallin yhteydessä. Oireellisesti, sitä käyttävät mm. paavi Leo työläisistä, Paavi Leo (sama mies), tarkastaja Gently, Unabomber, Marvin, Derek Parfit, Pete Mencken, käsineiti Peg Atwood, Iisakki Bashevis (Mencken sanoo ettei juutalaisilla ole sitä, Bashevis begs to differ), Pascal, Gud (som taler ud), Olli Saxi, Ransu Silava, mustarastaat, De Löllö, joku jumalinen Dr. Dodd, Mark Twain, joku taidekriitikko (puuttuu Goyan Mantoilta parvekkeella, toisin kuin Maneetin, joilla on sylikoirokin), Ernesto "Che" Hemingway, Alex Stubb Maidan-demonstraatioista, Kv filosofien päivän ohjelma 2021, Tytti Yli-Viikarin kainalossa ollut Hawthornen kirja Scarlet Letter, vihan banaanit eli kunniamurhaajat, Lionel Drivel, Alfred Apple Lolitasta, King David kuuma neitonen hot water bottlena. Mikä on tässä yhteistä? Kermaperseily rupusakin kustannuxella, eräänlaista moraalista charitya.
ellauri262.html on line 74: Hänen kirjoituksiaan on mainittu merkittävänä kirjallisena vaikutuksena moniin merkittäviin kirjailijoihin, mukaan lukien Lewis Carroll, W. H. Auden, David Lindsay, JM Barrie, Lord Dunsany, Elizabeth Yates, Oswald Chambers, Mark Twain, Hope Mirrlees, Robert E. Howard, [ lainaus tarvitaan ] L. Frank Baum, TH White, Richard Adams, Lloyd Alexander, Hilaire Belloc, GK Chesterton, Robert Hugh Benson, Dorothy Day, Thomas Merton, Fulton Sheen, Flannery O'Connor, Louis Pasteur, Simone Weil, Charles Maurras, Jacques Maritain, George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Ray Bradbury, C. H. Douglas, C. S. R. Lewis, Walter de la Mare, E. Nesbit, Peter S. Beagle, Elizabeth Goudge, Brian Jacques, MI McAllister, Neil Gaiman ja Madeleine L'Engle . [ tarvitaan lainaus varmistaakseni ]
ellauri262.html on line 205: In later life, Lewis corresponded with Joy Davidman Gresham, an American writer of Jewish background, a former Communist, and a convert from atheism to Christianity. She was separated from her alcoholic and abusive husband, novelist William L. Gresham, and came to England with her two sons, David and Douglas.
ellauri262.html on line 207: Lewis continued to raise Gresham's two sons after her death. Douglas Gresham is a Christian like Lewis and his apostate mother, while David Gresham turned to his mother's ancestral faith, becoming Orthodox Jewish in his beliefs. His mother's writings had featured the Jews in an unsympathetic manner, particularly on "shohet" (ritual slaughterer). David informed Lewis that he was going to become a ritual slaughterer to present this type of Jewish religious functionary to the world in a more favourable light. In a 2005 interview, Douglas Gresham acknowledged that he and his brother were not close, although they had corresponded via email.
ellauri262.html on line 209: David died on 25 December 2014.[66] In 2020, Douglas revealed that his brother had died at a Swiss mental hospital, and that when David was a young man he had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. So there!
ellauri262.html on line 213: Lewis was a prolific writer, and his circle of literary friends became an informal discussion society known as the "Inklings", including J. R. R. Tolkien, Nevill Coghill, Lord David Cecil, Charles Williams, Owen Barfield, and his brother Warren Lewis.
ellauri262.html on line 321: The scholar David Craig writes that Shelob is sometimes just called "she", drawing the reader's attention to her gender. Her "hate and depravity" are "strongly sexualised"; Tolkien wrote that "Far and wide her lesser broods, bastards of the miserable mates, her own offspring, that she slew, spread from glen to glen". Craig comments that "her crimes are abominable and include incest, illegitimacy and infanticide, all crimes pertaining to sex".
ellauri262.html on line 596: Kirjailija David Foster Wallace kehui kirjaa haastatteluissa ja sijoitti sen ensimmäiseksi kymmenen suosikkikirjansa listalle.
ellauri263.html on line 335: Various Modern Orthodox and Conservative rabbits have proposed amending Nachem, as its wording no longer reflects the existence of a rebuilt Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty. Chief Rabbit Shlomo Goren, for example, issued a revised wording of the prayer and Rabbit Hayim David HaLevi proposed putting the prayer's verbs relating to the Temple's destruction into the past tense. However, such proposals have not been widely adopted. Following the Six-Day War, the national religious community viewed Israel's territorial conquests with almost messianic overtones. The conquest of geographical areas with immense religious significance, including Jerusalem, the Western Wall, and the Temple Mount, was seen as portentous; however, only the full rebuilding of the Temple would engender enough reason to cease observing the day as one of mourning and transform it into a day of joy instead. The re-occupation of the Gaza strip is surely a source of joy, as well as annihilating philistines of the West Bank.
ellauri263.html on line 449: Hebron is considered one of the oldest cities in the Levant. According to the Bible, Abraham settled in Hebron and bought the Cave of the Patriarchs as a burial place for his wife Sarah. Biblical tradition holds that the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, along with their wives Sarah, Rebecca, and Leah, were buried in the cave. Hebron is also recognized in the Bible as the place where David was anointed king of Israel. Following the Babylonian captivity, the Edomites settled in Hebron. During the first century BCE, Herod the Great built the wall which still surrounds the Cave of the Patriarchs, which later became a church, and then a mosque. With the exception of a brief Crusader control, successive Muslim dynasties ruled Hebron from the 6th century CE until the Ottoman Empire's dissolution following World War I, when the city became part of British Mandatory Palestine. A massacre in 1929 and the Arab uprising of 1936–39 led to the emigration of the Jewish community from Hebron. The 1948 Arab–Israeli War saw the entire West Bank, including Hebron, occupied and annexed by Jordan, and since the 1967 Six-Day War, the city has been under Israeli military occupation. Following Israeli occupation, Jewish presence was reestablished at the city. Since the 1997 Hebron Protocol, most of Hebron has been governed by the Palestinian National Authority.
ellauri264.html on line 92: Wolves is a 2014 Canadian action horror film written and directed by David Hayter, and starring Lucas Till, Stephen McHattie, John Pyper-Ferguson, Merritt Patterson and Jason Momoa.
ellauri264.html on line 182:

Rabbi David Hertzberg z''l writes:
ellauri264.html on line 207: Useat kirjoittajat ja aktivistit (mukaan lukien Annie Leonard, Alan Durning, Jonathon Porritt, David Suzuki) ovat haastatelleet artikkelin osia, joita on laajalti lainattu ja kommentoitu, harhaanjohtavalla ja dekontekstualisoidulla tavalla todisteena "suunnitelman" olemassaolosta, jonka liike-elämän ja politiikan maailma on tietoisesti suunnitellut ja toteuttanut toisen maailmansodan jälkeen. Tämän tulkinnan mukaan sotatoimien jättämän valtavan tuotantokapasiteetin ylijäämän edessä nämä komponentit olisivat tietoisesti suunnitelleet ja edistäneet ajatusta raivostuneesta kulutuksesta, joka perustuu kulutustavaroiden nopeaan korvaamiseen. Tollasta vähän vasemmistolaista salaliittoteoriaa.
ellauri264.html on line 431: The 2012 Hay festival included writers Martin Amis, Jung Chang, Louis de Bernières, Mark Haddon, Mario Vargas Llosa, Hilary Mantel, Ian McEwan, Michael Morpurgo, Ben Okri, Ian Rankin, Salman Rushdie, Owen Sheers, Jeanette Winterson, comedians Bill Bailey, Rob Brydon, Julian Clary, Jack Dee, Tim Minchin, politicians Peter Hain and Boris Johnson, scientists John D. Barrow, Martin Rees, Simon Singh, and general speakers Harry Belafonte, William Dalrymple, Stephen Fry, A. C. Grayling, Germaine Greer, Michael Ignatieff, and David Starkey. What a pile of turds.
ellauri266.html on line 58: Rutherford (1975), who is half-Guyanese Indian, was born in Ipswich in the East of England and attended Ipswich School. His game is not football like Morris's but cricket. Rutherford was the podcast editor for the journal Nature for a while. He wrote a blog covering his thoughts when reading Charles Darwin's blockbuster On the Origin of Species. Adam is something of a cross between David Attenboro and Uncle Sam.
ellauri266.html on line 382: Sitten seurasivat Conquest of the Planet of the Apes vuonna 1972 ja Battle for the Planet of the Apes vuonna 1973. Kaksi jälkimmäistä elokuvaa kuvittelivat ensimmäisessä elokuvassa nähdyn planeetan nousun. Televisio-ohjelma seurasi vuonna 1974 ja toinen vuonna 1975, ennen kuin franchising suurelta osin päättyi. Muiden elokuvien jatkoromaaneihin osallistui muita Boullea apinoivia pellekirjailijoita kuten Michael Avallone, Jerry Pournelle, John Jakes ja David Gerrold, varhaisessa laajennetussa universumissa, jossa useat kirjailijat työskentelivät yhteisen projektin ja universumin parissa kuin apinat kirjoituskoneiden ääressä. Boulle pysyi yhteydessä elokuvien tuotantoon neuvotellen eri tarinan elementeistä.
ellauri266.html on line 543: De Waalin rinnalla palkittiin lähetystoiminnan harjoittaja ja luonnontieteilijä David Attenborough poikkeuksellisella ammattiuralla, mutta Barcelonan eläintieteellisen museon entinen johtaja biologi Roser Nos Ronchera sai vain kunniamaininnan.
ellauri269.html on line 759: Joidenkin viidennen ja seitsemännen luokan oppilaidensa lisäpanoksella rabbi ja yksityiskoulun opettaja pohtii Harry Potter -sarjan arvoja ja löytää yhtäläisyyksiä Toorasta ja Talmudista. Rosenberg ottaa "elämän ikuiset kysymykset" vastuualueekseen ("Anteeksi, ei noituutta ja taikasauvoja"), ja aloittaa henkilökohtaisella käyttäytymisellä ("Sääntöjen rikkominen", "Käytöstavat") ja laajentaa näkökulmaa, kun hän lopulta menee "Kuolemaan", "Hyvään ja pahaan" ja "Rakkauteen". Hän tekee vertailuja koko ajan - Harryn sääntöjen rikkomisen välillä, ei hauskaa, ja Elian teknisesti takalaittoman mutta hauskan "välienselvittelyn" välillä Ba'alin profeettojen kanssa Karmel -vuorella; Harryn, Ronin ja Hermionen sekä Mooseksen, Aaronin ja Miriamin triojen välillä; Kalkaroksen ja Daavidin katkeransuloiset parannukset. Ne ovat vain joskus hieman venytettyjä, ja paitsi silloin, kun hän kumittaa rasistisia sävyjä, joita jotkut lukijat havaitsevat Rowlingin talonhaltijoissa (mutta nuhtelee häntä tonttujen kohtelusta), ne ovat selvästi perusteltuja. Päättyen 20 sivuun yleisesti kiinnostavia opiskelijaesseitä ("Vaikka se, mitä Harry teki, oli hieman" rohkeampaa ", se, mitä Mooses teki, oli hieman järkevämpää") ja tiettyjen Raamatun viitteiden kerääminen, kirjoittaja helpottaa varovasti vielä vähemmän mietiskeleviä lukijoita harkitsemaan, kuten yksi lukupää sanoo, "Mikä todella merkitsee."
ellauri270.html on line 112: Tarinan ensimmäiset käänteet ovat kirjallisia. Elokuvan ensimmäinen esikuva on sotavankina viruneen John Coastin vankileirin elämää ja pakkotyötä kuvannut kirja Kuoleman rautatie, joka ilmestyi vuonna 1946. Sen pohjalta ranskalainen Pierre Boulle kirjoitti vuonna 1952 ilmestyneen, fiktiivisen romaanin. Viisi vuotta myöhemmin David Lean ohjasi Boullen romaaniin perustuvan menestyselokuvan, joka jäi maailman kollektiiviseen muistiin. Elokuva ei kuitenkaan ole Kwai–jokea nähnytkään. Itse asiassa sen nimistä jokea ei ole olemassakaan.
ellauri270.html on line 166: Kwai-joen silta on David Leanin ohjaama vuoden 1957 eeppinen sotaelokuva, joka perustuu Pierre Boullen vuoden 1952 romaaniin. Vaikka elokuva käyttää (paizi ei käytä) Burman rautatien rakentamisen historiallista ympäristöä vuosina 1942–1943, Boullen romaanin juoni ja henkilöt sekä käsikirjoitus ovat lähes kokonaan fiktiivisiä. Näyttelijöitä ovat William Holden, Alec Guinness, Cole Porter, Ginger Ale, Jack Hawkins, Sessue Hayakawa ja Jack Nicholson, joka ei kyllä ollut tässä filmissä. Tää raina on tehty Korean sodan aikana, kyseessä on myöhäiskolonialistinen propagandaelokuva.
ellauri270.html on line 597: Louis David Brandeis (later: Louis Dembitz Brandeis — see below) was born on November 13, 1856, in Louisville, Kentucky, the youngest of four children. He was born to immigrant parents from Bohemia, who raised him in a secular Jewish home. His parents, Adolph Brandeis and Frederika Dembitz, both of whom were Frankist Jews.
ellauri270.html on line 601: According to biographer Melvin Urolofsky, Brandeis was influenced greatly by his uncle Lewis Naphtali Dembitz. Unlike other members of the extended Brandeis family, Dembitz regularly practiced Judaism and was actively involved in Zionist activities. Brandeis later changed his middle name from David to Dembitz in honor of his uncle, and through his uncle's model of social activism, became an active member of the Zionist movement later in his life.
ellauri272.html on line 122: Two Boys Kissing by David Levithan
ellauri272.html on line 414: Critics tracing his creative genealogy are apt to begin with Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau and work chronologically forward through Walt Whitman, Ezra Pound, Robert Frost, Wallace Stevens, and William Carlos Williams. Of those poets, Harold Bloom felt that the transcendentalists Emerson and Whitman have influenced Ammons the most. Xcept he overdoes the colon. Radical colectomy is indicated.
ellauri272.html on line 420: Ammons’s concerns with the transcendental everyman coalesce in what may prove to be his finest effort: the National Book Award winner of 1993, Garbage. The title, suggested when Ammons drove by a Florida landfill, is characteristically flippant and yet perfectly serious. “Garbage is a brilliant book,” said David Baker in the Kenyon Review. “It may very well be a great one. ...
ellauri275.html on line 640:

Benito Juarez	137		Mexico
David Ben Gurion	152		Israel
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad	157		Iran
Abdelaziz Bouteflika	159		Algeria
Kim Yong Ill	160		Korea (North)
Dmitry Medvedev	163		Russia
Queen Elizabeth II	163		UK
Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner	164		Argentina
Nicolas Sarkozy	165		France
Angela Merkel	165		Germany
Silvio Berlusconi	165		Italy
Josef Stalin	165		Russia
Vladimir Lenin	165		Russia
Margaret Thatcher	165		UK
Julia Eileen Gillard	166		Australia
Napoleon	168		France
Winston Churchill	168		UK
Benito Mussolini	169		Italy
Yasuo Fukuda	169		Japan
François Hollande	170		France
Vladimir Putin	170		Russia
Tarja Halonen	172		Finland
François Mitterrand	172		France
Adolf Hitler	173		Germany
Harold Wilson	173		UK
Hugo Chávez	173		Venezuela
Gerhard Schröder	174		Germany
Viktor Orban	174		Hungary

ellauri275.html on line 642:

Gordon Brown

180

UK

 

John Major

180

UK

 

Georges Pompidou

181

France

 

George W. Bush

182

USA

 

Richard Nixon

182

USA

 

Muammar Gaddafi

183

Libya

 

Tony Blair

183

UK

 

Edward Heath

183

UK

 

John F Kennedy

183

USA

 

Gerald Ford

183

USA

 

Bill Clinton

184

USA

 

David Cameron

185

UK

 

Nick Clegg

185

UK

 

Sir Alec Douglas-Home

185

UK

 

James Callaghan

185

UK

 

Barack Obama

185

USA

 

Ronald Reagan

185

USA

 

Boris Yeltsin

187

Russia

 

George Washington

187

USA

 

Stephen Harper

188

Canada

 

Saddam Hussein

188

Iraq

 

George H.W Bush

188

USA

 

Jacques Chirac

189

France

 

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing

189

France

 

Fidel Castro

190

Cuba

 

Helmut Kohl

193

Germany

 

Robert Gascoyne-Cecil

193

UK

 

Abraham Lincoln

193

USA

 

Charles de Gaulle

196

France

 
ellauri276.html on line 89: Tuon aikakauden kronikot, Venäjän yhdistämisen vastustajat, David Bagrationi ja hänen veljensä kirjoittivat vuoden 1811 otsikon alla: "Huhtikuun viidentenä päivänä Chavchavadze Garsevan kuoli Pietarissa, tsaarin petturi ja uskoton. isänmaansa poika." Niinpä he vuodattivat vihansa, vaikka Garsevan vain allekirjoitti pumaskat ja toteutti kuningas Herakleioksen ja Georgian kansan tahdon.
ellauri277.html on line 188: Gibranista tykkäsivät monet neuvottomat julkkixet. Elvis Presley viittasi, käytti John Lennon, Johnny Cash äänitti, David Bowie mainitsi, uruguaylainen muusikko Armando Tirelli levytti ja sävelsi hepreaksi, ja sai ensi-iltansa Ranskassa nimellä River of Silence. Presleyn jalkanuotti:
ellauri277.html on line 401:
ellauri282.html on line 97: [3.4. klo 14.40] +358 44 2776451: Koskiko Humen giljotiini sittenkin vain positiivista oikeutta, jossa siitä miten laki on ei saa päätellä miten sen moraalisesti pitäisi olla. Humen sittemmin harrastamaan Englannin hiatorian suhteen akatuksesta on voinut olla tpdellista hyötyä. Oliko David Hume aikansa Teemu Keskisarja?
ellauri282.html on line 101: [3.4. klo 19.14] Oma Profiili: The famous Allan Ramsay portrait of David Hume, hanging in the University of Edinburgh, depicts him wearing a remarkable hat: a unique salmon-coloured turban. I was able to see the original on the occasion of receiving an honorary degree from Edinburgh in 2007, and ever since then I have desired to obtain a replica of that curious hat for myself (to wear on special occasions, such as those requiring academic regalia).
ellauri282.html on line 102: If you are interested in a unique David Hume Turban for yourself, you can email the Edinburgh University Philosophy Society, who are offering a special promotion of £120 per hat (excl. Shipping&Handling). This offer will be open until August 1st.
ellauri282.html on line 334: Thomas Merton, David R. Hawkins, Henri Nouwen, Eckhart Tolle, Jiddu Krishnamurti, Ignatius Loyola, Rajneesh, Deepak Chopra, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Bede Griffiths, Janos Arany, Ramesh S Balsekar, Thomas Keating, Richard Rohr, Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj, Nouriel Roubini, Ramana Maharshi, Wayne Dyer, What Hanhi, Khalil Gibran.
ellauri282.html on line 459: Joulukuun 10. päivänä 1968 Merton oli Punaisen Ristin Sawang Kaniwat -nimisessä retriittilaitoksessa Samut Prakanissa, maakunnassa lähellä Bangkokia, Thaimaassa ja osallistui luostarikonferenssiin. Aamuistunnossa puhuttuaan hänet löydettiin myöhemmin iltapäivällä mökkinsä huoneesta kuolleena, yllään vain shortsit, selällään ja oikosuljettu Hitachin lattiatuuletin makaa hänen vartalonsa poikki. Hänen työtoverinsa Jean Leclercq toteaa: "Todennäköisesti Thomas Mertonin kuolema johtui osittain sydämen vajaatoiminnasta, osittain sähköiskusta." Koska ruumiinavausta ei tehty, ei ollut sopivaa selitystä Mertonin "takapuolessa" olevalle haavalle, "joka oli vuotanut huomattavasti". Saapuessaan Mertonin viereisestä mökistä benediktiiniritarikunnan kädellinen ja konferenssin puheenjohtaja Rembert Weakland voiteli Mertonin. Hänen ruumiinsa lennätettiin takaisin Yhdysvaltoihin Vietnamista palaavalla Yhdysvaltain sotilaslentokoneella. Hänet on haudattu Getsemanin luostariin. Vuonna 2018 Hugh Turley ja David Martin julkaisivat The Martyrdom of Thomas Merton: An Investigationin, jossa kyseenalaisti vahingossa tapahtuvan sähköiskun teorian. Hämärää!
ellauri283.html on line 319: Vuonna 1504 Fonzien kerrotaan perustaneen Sennarin valtakunnan, johon Abdallah Jammun valtakunta liitettiin. Vuoteen 1523 mennessä, kun juutalainen turisti David Reubeni vieraili Sudanissa, Fonzien osavaltio ulottui jo pohjoiseen Dongolaan asti. Samaan aikaan islamia alkoivat saarnata Niilillä 1400- ja 1500-luvuilla asuneet sufi -pyhät ja David Reubenin vierailulla kuningas Amara Dungheap, aiemmin pakana tai enintään nimellinen kristitty, kirjattiin muslimiksi. Fonziella kuitenkin säilyi epäislamilaiset tavat, kuten jumalallinen kuninkuus tai alkoholin maistuvuus 1700-luvulle asti. Sudanin kansanislam säilytti monia kristillisistä perinteistä peräisin olevia rituaaleja lähimenneisyyteen asti, kuten ristiinnaulizeminen.
ellauri284.html on line 141: UUSI DELHI – Winston Churchill kutsui vuoden 1919 intialaisten mielenosoittajien joukkomurhaa "hirviömäiseksi". Kuningatar Elisabet sanoi, että se oli "tuskallista". Pääministeri David Cameron suhtautui "syvästi häpeällisesti".
ellauri284.html on line 437: Libertarian Party ( LP ) on poliittinen puolue Yhdysvalloissa, joka edistää kansalaisvapauksia, interventiokyvyttömyyttä, laissez-faire -kapitalismia sekä hallituksen koon ja laajuuden rajoittamista. Puolue syntyi elokuussa 1971 kokouksissa David F. Nolanin kotona Westminsterissä, Coloradossa, ja se perustettiin virallisesti 11. joulukuuta 1971 Colorado Springsissä, Coloradossa. Juhlien järjestäjät saivat inspiraatiota tunnetun itävaltalaisen koulukunnan teoksista ja ideoista pääpellenä ekonomisti, Murray Rothbard. Tästä kaverista on jo paasattu.
ellauri284.html on line 749: Herra Tristan, Rouva Kweilen Hatleskog, Rouva Humphrey, rouva Yael Lempert, Sir David Newbigging OBE, Sir Bryan Nicholson GBE,
ellauri284.html on line 750: herra Mark Seligman, Ilmaveivimarsalkka Sir David Walker KCVO OBE, rouva Xenia Wickett,
ellauri284.html on line 792: 1800-luvun alussa Waterford Cityä pidettiin haavoittuvaisena, ja Britannian hallitus pystytti kolme Martello-tornia Hookin niemimaalle vahvistamaan nykyistä Duncannonin linnaketta. 1800-luvulla kaupungissa menestyivät suuret teollisuudenalat, kuten lasinvalmistus ja laivanrakennus. Kaupunkia edusti Yhdistyneen kuningaskunnan parlamentissa vuosina 1891–1918 kansanedustaja John Redmond, Irlannin parlamentaarisen puolueen johtaja (tammikuusta 1900). Redmond, silloinen puolueen Parnell-puolueen johtaja, voitti David Sheehyn verisessä taistelussa vuonna 1891. Vuonna 1911 Br. Jerome Foley, Br. Dunstan Drumm ja Br. Leopold Loughran lähti Waterfordista Malverniin, Australiaan. Siellä he perustivat katolisen poikakoulun, joka on edelleen olemassa, uskokaa tai älkää, ellei ole lopettanut. (Ei ole: kz de Salle College, Malvern!
ellauri285.html on line 159: David Shipler, who is neither an Arab nor a Jew, served as the Jerusalem bureau chief for The New York Times from 1979 to 1984. Shipler sanoo että israelilaisissa nuortenkirjoissa arabi on saanut entisen saxalaisen, kasakan tai ukrainalaisen paikan viholliskuvana. Heprealaisen yliopiston naistenvessan seinässä lukee: Arabit on koiria/kissoja/hiiriä/hevosia/aaseja. Arabit hoilaavat miekkarissa: Me ollaan arabeja ja juutalaiset on meidän koiria.
ellauri285.html on line 171: Ainakin yksi israelilainen näyttää yrittäneen ehdottaa tätä Shiplerille, mutta turhaan. Kirjailija David Shahar kertoi hänelle, että juutalaiset tekevät kaiken PLO:n propagandan sen hyväksi, koska PLO:n ihmiset eivät ole tarpeeksi älykkäitä tekemään sitä itselleen. Mutta Shipler piti huomautusta toisena esimerkkinä juutalaisesta rasismista.
ellauri285.html on line 751: Alan David Sokal (/ˈsoʊkəl/; born January 24, 1955) is an American professor of mathematics at University College London and professor emeritus of physics at New York University. He works in statistical mechanics and combinatorics. He is a critic of postmodernism, and caused the Sokal affair in 1996 when his deliberately nonsensical paper was published by Duke University Press´s Social Text. He also co-authored a paper criticizing the critical positivity ratio concept in positive psychology.
ellauri288.html on line 350: Men in Aida is a homophonic translation of Book One of Homer's Iliad into a farcical bathhouse scenario, perhaps alluding to the homoerotic aspects of ancient Greek culture. It was written in 1983 by the language poet David Melnick, and is an example of poetic postmodernism. In 2015, all three books of the Iliad translated by Melnick were published by independent publishing house Uitgeverij under the title Men in Aïda.
ellauri290.html on line 83: Vaikka Yishuv-kannattajien keskuudessa vallitsi tietynlainen epäilys, heidän ilmeiset tappionsa johtuivat enemmän heidän odotus- ja katsomispolitiikastaan ​​kuin heikkoudesta. [Sitanteja tarvitaan] David Ben-Gurion järjesti Haganahin uudelleen ja teki asevelvollisuuden pakolliseksi. Jokaisen maan juutalaisen miehen ja naisen oli saatava sotilaskoulutusta. Golda Meirin yhdysvaltalaisilta kannattajilta keräämien varojen ja Stalinin päätöksen tukea sionistista asiaa Palestiinan juutalaiset edustajat pystyivät allekirjoittamaan erittäin tärkeitä asesopimuksia idässä. Muut Haganahin agentit keräsivät varastoja toisesta maailmansodasta, mikä auttoi parantamaan armeijan varusteita ja logistiikkaa. Operaatio Balak salli aseiden ja muiden varusteiden kuljettamisen ensimmäisen kerran maaliskuun loppuun mennessä.
ellauri290.html on line 87: David Ben-Gurion julisti 14. toukokuuta 1948 Israelin valtion perustetuxi ja vuoden 1948 Palestiinan sota eteni toiseen vaiheeseensa arabivaltioiden armeijoiden väliintulon myötä ja vuoden 1948 arabien ja Israelin välisen sodan alkaessa.
ellauri290.html on line 866: Sionistijohtajat tapasivat Biltmore-hotellissa New Yorkissa toukokuussa 1942 ja vaativat rajoittamatonta juutalaisten maahanmuuttoa ja juutalaisten liittovaltion perustamista. Satoja tuhansia holokaustista selviytyneitä pidettiin Hävyxiin joutuneiden henkilöiden leireissä (DP Camps), jotka haluavat mennä pakolliseen Palestiinaan (mandaatti-Filisteaan). Britit saivat paljon kansainvälistä painostusta Yhdysvaltain presidentiltä Harry Trumanilta, muuttaakseen maahanmuuttopolitiikkaansa. Huolimatta Britannian riippuvuudesta amerikkalaisesta taloudellisesta avusta, britit kieltäytyivät väittäen, että he joutuivat kokemaan liikaa vastustusta arabien ja juutalaisten taholta jo Palestiinassa ja pelkäsivät, mitä tapahtuisi, jos useampi koukkunokka pääsisi maahan. Kieltäytyminen valkoisen kirjan politiikan poistamisesta suututti ja radikalisoi Yishuvia. Yishuvin miliisiryhmät ryhtyivät sabotoimaan Britannian infrastruktuuria Palestiinassa ja jatkamaan laitonta maahanmuuttoa. Vuonna 1946 britit vastasivat Yishuvin ponnisteluja ja aloitti kaksi viikkoa kestäneen juutalaisten etsinnät, joita epäillään Britannian vastaisista toimista, pidättäen monia Haganahin johtajia. Kun britit etsivät Haganahia, Irgunia ja Lehi hyökkäsivät persepuolelta brittijoukkoja vastaan. Tunnetuin heidän hyökkäyksistään oli King David -hotelliin, joka on Britannian sotilaskomento ja British Criminal Investigation Division. Tämä paikka valittiin, koska muutamaa viikkoa aikaisemmin Haganasta takavarikoitiin ja tuotiin sinne suuri määrä asiakirjoja. Huolimatta Yishuvin varoituksesta ja kehotuksesta evakuoida rakennus, brittiviranomaiset päättivät olla antautumatta paineelle. Yishuv hyökkäsi joka tapauksessa aiheuttaen 91 kuoleman, joista 28 oli brittiläisiä ja 17 Palestiinan juutalaisia. Varsinainan holokausti sekin.
ellauri294.html on line 152: Paavali selittää, että ympärileikkaus otettiin käyttöön vain väliaikaisena toimenpiteenä, joka ei ole enää tarpeen nyt, kun Abrahamin siemen, Kristus, on tullut kullista. (Ihmispuolikas tuli Davidin lihapalasta, herrapuoli herrasta, se tarkentaa jossain kohdassa.) Paavalin asenne muodostaa suuren vastakohdan Jaakobin, Jeesuksen velipojan, asemalle, jonka ryhmä Jerusalemissa noudatti Tooran noudattamista.
ellauri294.html on line 535: Los Angeles Timesin Sheila Benson kehui animaatiota, mutta kritisoi tarinaa sen liian turvallisesta esittämisestä. Hän myönsi, että kirjoittajat "suojelivat meitä tärkeiltä asioilta: raivolta, tuskalta, menetykseltä. Näillä valheilla, jotka on tehty omaksi parhaaksemme, ne tietysti rajoittavat myös mahdollista kasvua." David Ansen Newsweekistä totesi: "Aikuiset saattavat värähtää joistakin tahmea-suloisista kappaleista, mutta elokuvaa ei ole tarkoitettu aikuisille."
ellauri294.html on line 597: The Belstone Fox, vuoden 1973 brittiläinen elokuva, jolla on samanlaiset teemat, ja se perustuu David Rookin vuoden 1970 romaaniin The Ballad of the Belstone Fox.
ellauri294.html on line 603: Time Out kutsui elokuvaa "järisyttävän kirjaimelliseksi ja mielikuvituksettomaksi versioksi David Rookin romaanista"; Radio Times antoi sille kaksi tähteä viidestä ja kutsui sitä "työläismäiseksi sovitukseksi" ja lisäsi: "Porter ja Rachel Roberts hylkäävät itsensä asianmukaisesti, mutta elokuva tekee lopulta vaikutuksen enemmän villieläinvalokuvastaan kuin dramaattisesta kiinnostuksestaan."
ellauri294.html on line 607: David Rookin vuoden 1970 romaanilla ja James Hillin vuoden 1973 elokuvalla on kuitenkin yhtäläisyyksiä 3v aikaisemmin julkitulleen Mannix-romaanin kanssa. Molemmissa on punainen kettu. Metsästäjä kasvattaa ketun perheensä surmattuaan. Kettu palaa myöhemmin luontoon ja pakenee metsästäjää ja hänen koiransa ajamalla kiskoja juuri ennen junan lähtöä. Tämä johtaa onnettomuuteen, joka saa metsästäjän jäljittämään kettua kostoa varten. On kuitenkin myös huomattavia eroja. Mannix-romaanissa metsästäjä, joka kasvattaa kettua, on eri mezästäjä kuin metsästäjä, joka vannoo kostoa hänelle. Rook-romaanissa metsästäjä, joka ottaa vastaan ketun, on sama kuin se, joka myöhemmin vannoo kostoa. Myös Rook-romaanissa useita koiria kuolee junaonnettomuudessa, kun taas Mannixin romaanissa vain metsästäjän suosikkikoira kuolee. Toinen merkittävä ero on, että Mannix-romaanissa pääkoiralla, jota metsästäjä käyttää loukkaavan ketun jäljittämiseen, ei ole aiempaa sexisuhdetta kyseiseen ketuun. Rookin romaanissa tämä kettu ja koira ovat lapsuuden ystäviä, mikä on sopusoinnussa Disneyn vuoden 1981 Kettu ja koira -sovituksen kanssa, mutta poikkeaa Mannixin lähdemateriaalista.
ellauri297.html on line 85: Yhteiskunnallisesti Israel eli Jerobeam II:n aikana voimakkainta ja vahvinta talouskasvun aikaa sitten Daavidin ja Salomonin. Valtakunta oli laajentunut uudelleen "suurvallaksi" ja osa kansasta vaurastui huomattavasti. Silti Israelin romahtamiseen ja tuhoon oli aikaa enää vain 40 vuotta! Tilanne muuttuikin heti Sunbeam Imp II:n jälkeen. Israelia hallitsi enää muutama hyvin lyhytaikainen kuningas. Maa oli sisäisesti levoton ja ulkopuolelta kasvoi voimistuvan Assyrian paine. Assyria hyökkäsikin kolmesti Israeliin: 1. verorasitus, 2. varakkaampi osa porukoista pakkosiirtolaisuuteen ja 3. Israelin tuho ja kaikki pakkosiirtolaisuuteen.
ellauri297.html on line 352: ja Daavidia, kuningastansa.
ellauri299.html on line 348: Lokakuussa 1967 David Dellinger Vietnamin sodan lopettamisesta kansallisesta mobilisaatiokomiteasta pyysi Rubinia auttamaan mobilisoimaan ja ohjaamaan marssia Pentagonissa. Mielenosoittajat kokoontuivat Lincoln Memorialille, kun Dellinger ja tohtori Benjamin Spock (vauvatohtori, ei se puikkokorva) pitivät puheita joukolle ihmisiä.
ellauri299.html on line 584: Vuonna 2003 julkistettiin suunnitelmat romaanin ehdotetusta pienestä näyttösovituksesta ja televisiopilotti kuvattiin. Touchstone Televisionin tuottaman ohjelman pääosissa oli Eddie Cibrian Brockina, KaDee Stricklandina, Mario Van Peeblesina ja Hal Holbrookina. Paris Barclay ohjasi pilotin, jonka käsikirjoittivat Brian Koppelman ja David Levien. Syistä, joita ei koskaan julkistettu, ohjelmalle ei koskaan annettu koko kauden esittelyä. Ihmekös tuo, 2003 oli vahva oikeistoaalto menossa, kun Paha puska paraikaa rynnäköi Irakissa.
ellauri300.html on line 605: Luria drack sitt kaffe och åt sin kaka. Det här lilla mellanmälet gjorde honom hungrig, hängig, svag i knäna. Någon hade lämnat en bulle på bordet och Luria tog den och började tugga på den. Detta var inte att stjäla - man skulle i alla fall kasta bort den. Ja, faktiskt, vad skulle folk göra om de inte hade något mål i livet? Alla de där rekommendationera var för de starka, inte för de svaga. Ta till exempel den unga kvinnan som torkade av borden. Hon skulle aldrig kunna bli en Rockefeller, en Ford. Hon skulle fortsätta att torka av bord i ett par år till, sedan skulle hon gifta sig, kanske med en portvakt, och snart bli gravid. Hon skal få barn varje år. På lördagarna skulle hon släpa hem sin berusade man från någon bar och han skulle förbanna henne och skälla ut henne. Barnen skulle ärva sina föräldrars begränsningar. Och kommunismen då? Den var skapad av de starka för de starka. De svaga skulle torka bord generation efter generation, även om människan kunde flyga till Mars, även om maskinerna tog över allt mänskligt arbete.
ellauri300.html on line 790: Det är en utbredd uppfattning att ”Ishmael” (araberna) först måste besegras innan ”Davids son” (Moshiach) kan utropas till kung och i samma anda menar man att det först är då som det är möjligt att genomföra den slutgiltiga utrotningen av Amaleks säd ned till sista man, kvinna och barn eftersom man vid denna tid kommer att ”ha full kontroll” och inte längre vara ”beroende av andra nationer”.
ellauri302.html on line 105: avid-Kessler_Jennie-Goldstein_Malvina-Lobel.jpg/440px-David-Kessler_Jennie-Goldstein_Malvina-Lobel.jpg" />
ellauri302.html on line 106:

Like David Susskind

1. Musiikinjohtajalle. Daavidin psalmi.
   xxx/ellauri199.html on line 650: 1. Daavidin psalmi, kun hän oli tekeytynyt mielipuoleksi Abimelekin edessä. Tämä karkotti hänet luotaan, ja hän lähti pois.
   
   xxx/ellauri200.html on line 428: 1979 formulerade Engdahl en kritik mot hur fascismen agerar och istället borde agera. Han föreskrev en strategi som bland annat innebar ett nedtonande av rasbegreppet; istället skulle kritiken riktas mot invandringen. Med inspiration av denna text grundade Sven Davidsson med flera Bevara Sverige Svenskt (BSS).
   xxx/ellauri200.html on line 429: Sven Gunnar Davidson, född 7 juli 1931, död 14 januari 2005, var en svensk ingenjör och högerextrem politiker. Han var mellan 1983 och 1986 ledare för Bevara Sverige Svenskt och satt mellan 1986 och 1988 som vice partiledare i Sverigepartiet. Från 1989 satt Davidson i styrelsen för Sverigedemokraterna.
   xxx/ellauri208.html on line 472: Mahfouz tuki Egyptin presidentin Anwar Sadatin Israelin kanssa vuonna 1978 solmimaa Camp Davidin rauhansopimusta. Sen takia häntä boikotoidaan monissa arabimaissa.
   xxx/ellauri208.html on line 609: Totuutta ei voi ilmaista sanoin se nähdään välähdyxenomaisesti. No mitä vitun hyötyä siitä sitten on? Höpötystä.Totuus on vastaavuutta, se on joku todellisuuden representaatio, esim kissavideo. Sen voi periaatteessa kopioida ja viestittää. Voi sen pukea sanoixikin, joskin resoluutio ei välttämättä ole hyvä.
   xxx/ellauri208.html on line 636: Björling var son till sångaren och metallsågaren David Björling och Ester Björling, född Sund (1882–1917). David Björling var född i Hälsingland, men uppvuxen i Finland i trakten av Björneborg och flyttade i unga år tillbaka till Sverige. David Björlings föräldrar var Lars Johan Björling och Matilda Lönnqvist och det var farmodern Matilda som gav Jussi Björling smeknamnet Jussi som sedan kom att bli hans namn. David Björling utbildade sig till verktygssmed och fick arbete motsvarande utbildningen i Borlänge.
   xxx/ellauri215.html on line 415: Amina was born in the middle of the sixteenth century CE to King Nikatau, the 22nd ruler of Zazzau, and Queen Bakwa Turunku (r. 1536–c. 1566). She had a younger sister named Zaria for whom the modern city of Zaria (Kaduna State) was renamed by the British in the early twentieth century. According to oral legends collected by anthropologist David E. Jones, Amina grew up in her grandfather's court and was favored by him. He carried her around court and instructed her carefully in political and military matters.
   xxx/ellauri224.html on line 137: David Walsh of World Socialist Web Site wrote: "The 'hope' now Moore expresses near the conclusion of the work that we might 'get rid of the whole rotten system that gave us Donald Trump' is empty and meaningless, in so far as he continues to support one of the principal props of that rotten system, the Democratic Party. Whatever occasional insights and striking imagery it might offer, Fahrenheit 11/9 is false and dishonest at its core."
   xxx/ellauri224.html on line 492: – Jag har aldrig varit så rasande i hela mitt liv, säger Michael till Daily Voice. Jag mår så illa över det här. Det visade sig att mannen tidigare hade varit gift med Linda Torello. När hon blev gravid lämnade han henne och skilsmässan gick igenom 1974. Mannen gifte senare om sig.
   xxx/ellauri224.html on line 592: "Ralph" Nader oli Yhdysvaltain vihreän puolueen presidenttiehdokkaana vuosien 1996 ja 2000 vaaleissa, molempina kertoina varapresidenttiehdokkaanaan Winona LaDuke. Vuonna 2004 vihreä puolue nimitti ehdokkaakseen David Cobbin ja Nader oli sitoutumattomana ehdokkaana. Myös vuoden 2008 vaaleissa Nader oli ehdolla sitoutumattomana.
   xxx/ellauri227.html on line 163:
   xxx/ellauri228.html on line 360: Danish film director Lars von Trier is a fervent admirer of Tarkovsky. He dedicated his 2009 film Antichrist to him, and, while discussing it with critic David Jenkins, asked: "Have you seen Mirror? I was hypnotised! I've seen it 20 times. It's the closest thing I've got to a religion – to me he is a god".
   xxx/ellauri228.html on line 552: Der Schweizerische Robinson oder Schweizerischer Robinson, im englischen Sprachraum als Swiss Family Robinson bekannt, im Tschechischen als Švýcarský Robinson und im Französischen als Le Robinson suisse, ist ein literarisches Werk und eine Robinsonade: eine Adaption des Romans Robinson Crusoe von Daniel Defoe. Der Berner Stadtpfarrer Johann David Wyss verfasste die Geschichte in den Jahren 1794 bis 1798 und erzählte sie seinen vier Kindern. Einer seiner Söhne, Johann Rudolf Wyss, hat sie dann für die Veröffentlichung vorbereitet.
   xxx/ellauri229.html on line 439: Skellig from the book of the same name by avid_Almond" title="David Almond">David Almond
   xxx/ellauri229.html on line 602: Uusi propaganda­video iskee lännen arvoihin – yksi viesteistä on kuin suoraan Putinin ”satanismi­puheesta”. Siinä viaton venäläinen lomailijaperhe joutuu kärsimään kaikenlaisten lännen rotinkaisten edessä, mutiainen kiilaa vessajonossa, lesbopari halaa rivosti, ym. ym. Häh, video on selkeästi länkkäreille suunnattu ja sen tarkoitus on maalata ryssäläisistä jotain trolleja. Oikaisu 10.10. kello 10.36. Uutista ja otsikkoa muokattu. Uutisessa luki aikaisemmin, että kyse olisi Venäjän tuottamasta propagandavideosta. Videon tekijästä ei kuitenkaan ole "täyttä varmuutta." Niinkuin ei Itämeren kaasuputken räjäyttäjästäkään.
   xxx/ellauri230.html on line 574: Japanilaisten jalkojen haku - 13 980 japanilaista jalkavideota löytyi palvelusta. Saorilla on jalkoja verkoissa nuollattu ja perseestä 5 min. japanilainen Sara käyttää jalkojaan ympärileikkaamattomalla kalulla, mikä tekee siitä kovempaa ja valmiina 10 min. Japanilainen cheerleader jalkoja lyömässä luokkatoveriaan 8 min. Perfekti Aasian sairaanhoitaja jalkatyö, käsityö ja tissityö. Katso kaikki korkealuokkainen japanilainen jalkasisältö jalkasivustolla.
   xxx/ellauri231.html on line 191: Britannian sotaministeri Winston Churchill painosti hallituksessa erittäin voimakkaasti, että Britannia tunnustaisi Koltshakin hallituksen, mutta pääministeri David Lloyd George tekisi niin vain, jos Yhdysvallat tunnustaisi myös Koltshakin. Yhdysvaltain presidentti Woodrow Wilson oli voimakkaasti vihamielinen Koltshakia kohtaan, epäili avoimesti hänen sanaansa ja vastusti diplomaattista tunnustamista. Wilsonin tärkein neuvonantaja Venäjää koskevissa asioissa oli entinen väliaikaisen hallituksen päällikkö Aleksander Kerensky, joka kertoi Wilsonille, että Koltshak oli "reaktionaarinen", joka "pystyttää hallinnon, joka tuskin on vähemmän järjetöntä ja sortavaa kuin bolshevikit". Vaikka amerikkalaiset joukot Siperiassa tekivät yhteistyötä Koltshakin kanssa, oli selvää, että hän ei ollut se mies, jota Yhdysvallat suosisi Venäjän seuraavana johtajana. Amerikkalaiset joukot oli sitäpaizi lähetetty Siperiaan vähemmän auttamaan valkoisia kuin estämään Venäjän Kaukoidän miehittäneitä japanilaisia ​​liittämästä Siperiaa Jaappaniin, kuten Tokio avoimesti harkitsi.
   xxx/ellauri231.html on line 264: Möhnäläiset listivät myös sankoin joukoin mennoniitteja. Floyd Pattersonin tutkimus on osoittanut. että hyökkäykset johtuivat syntyperäisten ukrainalaisten ja mennoniittien siirtolaisten välisestä syvästä kaunasta. Eikös se David "Sikiö" Wallacekin ruvennut jossain vaiheessa mennoniitaxi? Joo: Although his parents were atheists, Wallace twice attempted to join the Catholic Church, but "flunked the period of inquiry". He later attended a Mennonite church. Näistä lisää myös albumissa 339.
   xxx/ellauri232.html on line 201: Toukokuussa 2016 syntyi uusi kohu, kun kävi ilmi, että Sahlin oli antanut kollegalleen valheellisen tulotodistuksen. Teko oli poliisin tutkittavana ja Sahlin erosi tehtävästään kulttuuriministeriössä. Sahlinilla on tytär Ann-Sofie (s. 1978) David Peñan kanssa. Hän meni naimisiin Bo Sahlinin kanssa 1982 ja heillä on kolme yhteistä lasta, Jenny, Gustav ja Johan. Johan kuoli alle yksivuotiaana. Huono äiti vielä.
   xxx/ellauri233.html on line 92: Rabbi David Pienen nemesis on synagoogan presidentti Musta. Mustan suu on kuin Kawabatan geisha Ankan, pyöreä kuin iilimadolla. Hyi miten nää itämaiset tyypit onkin iljettäviä.
   xxx/ellauri233.html on line 171: Truth be told, Harry Kemelman did not like David Small very much. "He's not a very likable person," Kemelman said of the fictional rabbi. "No congregation would tolerate him. I wish there were more rabbis like him."
   xxx/ellauri233.html on line 261: Brittien ja hollantilaisten protestanttisen kaukoidän ryöstölaivaston laivat oli nimeltään Toivo, Hyväntekeväisyys, Usko, Tottelevaisuus, Voitto-Sanoma. Laivaston alkuperäinen tehtävä oli purjehtia Etelä-Amerikan länsirannikolle, missä he vaihtaisivat rahtinsa hopeaan, ja suunnata Japaniin vain, jos ensimmäinen tehtävä epäonnistuu. Siinä tapauksessa heidän piti hankkia hopeaa Japanista ja ostaa mausteita Molukkeilta ennen kuin he suuntasivat takaisin Eurooppaan. Heidän tavoitteenaan oli purjehtia Magellanin salmen läpi päästäkseen kohtalolleen, mikä pelotti monia merimiehiä ankarista sääolosuhteista johtuen. Laivastossa oli kaiken kukkuraxi mukana 30 englantilaista muusikkoa, mm. Yardbirds, Beatles, Dusty Springfield, Rolling Stones, Tom Jones, Elton John, David Bowie, Phil Collins, Cat Stevens, Sid Vicious, Brian Eno, Ozzy Osbourne, Led Zeppelin, Keith Richards, Freddie Mercury, Keith Moon, Adele, Amy Winehouse, The Who, Electric Light Orchestra, The Smiths, The Gorillaz, Bee Gees, Dua Lipa, Dire Straits, Spice Girls, Iron Maiden, The Queen, Olivia Newton-John, Billy Idol, Boy George, Pink Floyd, Motörhead, The Clash, Elvis Costello, Nick Drake, Donovan, Marianne Faithful, Edward Elgar, Petula Clark, Kate Bush, Sade, Dido, Sting, Seal, Cream, Haendel ja Rod Stewart. No okei, oli niitä enemmän kuin 30, mutta silti vittu. Ne kaikki hukkuivat. Jotkut heitettiin laidan yli ärsyttävästä soitosta.
   xxx/ellauri235.html on line 859: Shifty Jewish economist David D. Friedman argues that the ICC always served the railroads as a cartelizing agent and used its authority over highway transportation to prevent cars, where possible, from undercutting the railroads. Thanx Dave! Well done Dave! Fuck you Dave, go and schtick your schlong under a locomotive!
   xxx/ellauri235.html on line 901: Korinna oli kai johkin aikaan elänyt naisrunoilija Teebassa. Sen pilkkanimi oli Myia (Μυῖα, "kärpänen"). Ärsyttävä pikku Myy. Corinnan sanottiin kilpailleen Pindarin kanssa ja voittaneen hänet ainakin yhdessä runokilpailussa, vaikka jotkut lähteet väittävät viisi, mutta se nyt on takuulla puppua! Ize asiassa kaikki todennäkösesti on! Ei ne varmaan edes eläneet samana aikana! Vitun kärpänen! Jotkut Martin ja David on "melkein varmoja" että se eli vasta 300-luvulla. Hemmetin ämmä, olikohan sitä olemassa edes ollenkaan? Joku pazas joo on jostain kristilliseltä ajalta jossa lukee Korinna, mutta sehän on voinut esittää ketä tahansa. Vaikka sitä kunnioitettiin kotikaupungissaan Tanagrassa ja se oli suosittu muinaisessa Roomassa, nykyaikaiset kriitikot pitävät hiäntä maakunnallisena ja tylsänä. Hänen runoutensa on lähinnä kiinnostavaa yhtenä harvoista säilyneistä naisrunoilijoista muinaisesta Kreikasta. Noin neljäkymmentä katkelmaa tän muka-Corinnan runoudesta on säilynyt, mikä on enemmän kuin kukaan muinainen naisrunoilija paitsi Sappho, mutta yhtään hänen täydellisiä runoaan ei tunneta. So there!
   xxx/ellauri239.html on line 500: Videot Arthurin sormieleestä leviävät netissä, Ida tekee hätkähdyttävän päätöksen, ja David paljastaa matkasuunnitelmiinsa liittyvän salaisuuden.
   xxx/ellauri250.html on line 608: Charles Bukowski was the inspiration behind the first chapter of Mark Manson's bestselling self-help book The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck. Charles Bukowski has been depicted on television as well, namely on the Showtime comedy-drama series Californication. The show's main character Hank Moody, played by actor David Duchovny, is an author based in Los Angeles who subscribes to the same kind of lifestyle that Bukowski became known for. The show depicts profuse indulgence of alcoholism, sex and narcotics, which many critics have described as a television adaption of Bukowski'
   xxx/ellauri250.html on line 627: Peter Albert David Singer AC/DC (born 6 July 1946) is an Australian moral philosopher, currently the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University. He specialises in applied ethics and approaches ethical issues from a secular, utilitarian perspective. He is known in particular for his book Animal Liberation (1975), in which he argues in favour of veganism, and his essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality", in which he argues in favour of donating veggies to help the global poor. For most of his career, he was a preference utilitarian, but he stated in The Point of View of the Universe (2014), coauthored with Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, that as he became a celeb and started earning bigger bucks, he had become a hedonistic utilitarian, or utilitarian hedonist.
   xxx/ellauri250.html on line 850: Its title refers to the Biblical valley where the battle between David and Goliath took place.
   xxx/ellauri250.html on line 853: ‘Emeq HaEla (hebreiska: עמק האלה) är en dal i Israel. Den ligger i distriktet Jerusalem, i den centrala delen av landet. Called in Arabic: وادي السنط, Wadi es-Sunt, it is a long, shallow valley now in Israel and the West Bank best known as the place described in the Hebrew Bible (the Old Testament of Christianity) where the Israelites were encamped when David fought Goliath (1 Samuel 17:2; 1 Samuel 17:19). The valley is named after the large and shady terebinth trees (Pistacia atlantica) which are indigenous to it. David ja Goljat mutustelivat siellä pistaasipähkinöitä ennen matsia. The Valley of Elah has gained new importance as a possible point of support for the argument that Israel was more than merely a tribal chiefdom in the time of King David. Others are skeptical and suggest it might be just another piece of Jewish propaganda.
   xxx/ellauri250.html on line 862: During David’s youth as a shepherd, he (David) developed many skills. He learned music, how to write, use a slingshot, how to pull uncircumcized men by the beard, and how to love Jonathan and obey the Lord. Do I understand that it’s my responsibility to develop my abilities like Jonathan Livingston The Seagull, and it’s God’s responsibility to direct me in how I use them? Do I realize that the most important skill I possess is my love for the Lord and my heart to obey Him? What miracles might God want to do through me that would show the whole earth that there is a God in the land? Kan jeg ble en helt liksom Harry Hole?
   xxx/ellauri255.html on line 587: The Great Turn or Great Break (Russian: Великий перелом) was the radical change in the economic policy of the USSR from 1928 to 1929, primarily consisting of the process by which the New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921 was abandoned in favor of the acceleration of collectivization and industrialization and also a cultural revolution. The term came from the title of Joseph Stalin's article "Year of the Great Turn" ("Год великого перелома: к XII годовщине Октября", literally: "Year of the Great Break: Toward the 12th Anniversary of October") published on November 7, 1929, the 12th anniversary of the October Revolution. David R. Marples argues that the era of the Great Break lasted until 1934.
   xxx/ellauri259.html on line 246: Matkalaulu. Daavidin psalmi.
   
   xxx/ellauri259.html on line 261: Aiheena on siis oman tahdon tukahduttaminen. Ajatelkaamme sitä hyvää, mikä on mahdollista epäonnistumisen kautta, pettymyksen onnea, tappion rauhaa. Näemme miesten käyttävän kaikki voimansa johonkin jaloon tarkoitukseen, mutta hyvät tulokset jäävät oudosti pidättäytymään. He suunnittelevat pyhiä suunnitelmia, jotka, kuten Daavidin temppelin rakentaminen, ovat turhautuneita. Jeesus Kristus ei pidä edes hänen työtään parempana kuin omaansa. Viimeinen uhri, joka joidenkin ihmisten on tehtävä, ei ole nautinnon uhraus tai jostain kallisarvoisesta aarteesta luopuminen; se on rakkaan tarkoitusperän uhri, jolla he toivoivat voivansa tuoda kunniaa Herralleen. Heitä vaaditaan kääntymään pyhän palvelun polulta, luopumaan pyhästä yrityksestä. John Ruskin on kertonut meille, kuinka hänen toivonsa paremmasta palvelusta katkesi hänen tullessaan selkeämpään terveydentilaan. "Juuri kun olin päässyt koulusta, olin pahoillani siitä, että olin niin typerä poika, mutta kuitenkin otin palkinnon tai kaksi, ja odotan nyt ryhtyväni johonkin vakavampaan liiketoimintaan kuten kriketti, olen hylännyt mestarin, jolle toivoin tarjoilla. Kuinka viehättävä tapa, jolla Johannes Kastaja hyväksyi kaventuvan sfäärin ja myöntyi olosuhteisiin, jotka jättivät hänet hotellin hämärään ja hiljaisuuteen. "Hänen täytyy kasvaa, mutta minun on vähennettävä." Tämä hieno nöyryys antaa jalolle sielulle muuttavan kosketuksen. Se luo pehmeän loiston hänen luonteensa graniittihuippuihin.
   xxx/ellauri259.html on line 303: Tiibetologi André Migot toteaa, että alkuperäinen buddhalaisuus ei ehkä opettanut täydellistä minuuden puuttumista, viitaten buddhalaisten ja palilaisten tutkijoiden Jean Przyluskin ja Caroline Rhys Davidsin esittämiin todisteisiin siitä, että varhainen buddhalaisuus uskoi yleensä itseensä, mikä teki buddhalaisista kouluista, jotka myöntävät "itsen" ei harhaoppisia, vaan konservatiiveja, pitäen kiinni muinaisista uskomuksista.
   xxx/ellauri261.html on line 159: Naisbitt has had a profound influence leading on modern-day futurists, such as David Howler and others. David Howler (born 3 July 1948) is a futurist, keynote speaker, and author of The Shit Age. He coined the phrase "The Shit Age" and identified this new age as the successor to the Information Age in 2007. How right he was. Howler was profiled in the coffee table book Connected Worlds published by BTGroup PLC 2014.
   xxx/ellauri261.html on line 227: Burden received only a two-year scholarship offered to women to attend the University of Chicago where she studsed frequently under Thornton Wilder and graduated in 1936. She and her husband David were married from 1940 to 1949. After the dissolution of their marriage, Jean met Alan Watts and they had a "four year, tumultuous love affair". Though ending badly, the union inspired Watts to call Jean in his autobiography (p. 297) an "important influence". Jean used Alan´s calligraphy and a quote from him (有水皆含月 : All the waters contain the moon) in her last major work, Taking Light from Each Other. She called him "one of the most fascinating men I have ever met, except Thornton was Wilder".
   xxx/ellauri261.html on line 421: The story enjoyed yet another incarnation in 1964 when David Merrick, who had produced the 1955 Broadway play, partnered with composer Jerry Herman to mount the hugely successful, Tony Award-winning musical Hello, Dolly! starring Carol Channing.
   xxx/ellauri261.html on line 498: David Hurst as Rudolph Reisenweber
   xxx/ellauri268.html on line 275: Merope is the name of a daughter of Atlas in Greek Mythology. It is also the name of the mother of Oedipus in Oedipus Rex. Both Voldemort and Oedipus killed their fathers randomly. The flashback scene featuring Merope and her family was cut from the film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince because of time and pacing concerns. However, it was originally present in an early draft of the film's screenplay according to director David Yates. It's unknown if there were any actresses considered to play Merope by that point. Joanie would have been good for a cameo appearance. Merope means 'part face', possibly a reference to the asymmetry of the two halves of Joanne's face.
   xxx/ellauri268.html on line 295: Vaikka goblinin epämiellyttävä samankaltaisuus vihamielisten antisemitististen trooppisten kanssa on jo havaittu (ja Pete Davidson on SNL:ssä tunnetusti valaissut sen ), Stewartin kommentit herättivät laajaa huomiota kiistaan.
   xxx/ellauri268.html on line 301: Vaikka kirjat toistivat ehdottomasti antisemitistisiä trooppisia trooppisia tyyppejä, Harry Potter -elokuvat veivät rasistisen yhdistyksen askeleen pidemmälle, jolloin peikko ulkonäköä ei käytännössä eronnut natsien propagandajulisteesta; pahempaa oli Daavidin tähti -kuvio, joka oli selvästi näkyvissä Gringotts Bankin lattialla (tämä oli kuvauspaikan, Lontoon Australian korkeimman komission ominaisuus, eikä sitä esiintynyt myöhemmissä elokuvissa).
   xxx/ellauri268.html on line 487: avid-sedaris-gettyimages-1200378467.jpg?crop=1xw:1.0xh;center,top&resize=980:*" height="200px" />
   xxx/ellauri268.html on line 503: Born in 1956, avid">David Sedaris spent his childhood in New York and North Carolina. He was the second of six children born to Sharon and Lou Sedaris, IBM engineers who eventually moved the family to Raleigh, North Carolina. Sedaris graduated from Sanderson High School in Raleigh, where he performed in plays and wrestled with the realization he was gay. After moving to New York City in the fall of 1991, Sedaris found jobs as a housecleaner and department store elf to support his writing.
   xxx/ellauri268.html on line 511: Taavilla on yhtä kuulu sisko Amy, joka laukoo samoissa tv-illanvietoissa samasta puusta veistettyjä puujalkagägejä. Ne oli ilmeisesti peräisin niiden evankeliselta äidiltä, joka oli yhtä wickedly funny kuin David Fosterin äitykkä. Isä oli puiseva ja kreikanuskoinen, viinamäen miehiä. Taisikohan arvostaa puppelia Taavi-poikaansa. No ehkä sitten kun rahaa alkoi tulla kuin kraanasta. Sedariin surettava taru jatkuu albumissa 362.
   xxx/ellauri280.html on line 175: Arie (Arie Bar David) ja hänen perheensä ovat suomalaiskristittyjen vuonna 1971 perustaman kibbutsin ’jäseniä’. Suomalaisten saapuessa rakennuksia ei vielä ollut, vain paljas vuorenrinne ja jotain arabiaxi räyhääviä filistiinejä. Vuoteen 1974 mennessä he olivat rakentaneet sementistä 8koko joukon settlementtitaloja.
   xxx/ellauri281.html on line 181: Daniel T. Birdsell, Harihar Rajaram, David Dempsey, Hari S. Viswanathan. Hydraulisen murtumisnesteen migraatio pinnan alla: Katsaus ja laajennetut mallinnuksen tulokset. // Vesivarojen tutkimus. Osa 51, numero 9. syyskuuta 2015. Sivut 7159–7188. DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017810
   xxx/ellauri287.html on line 562: John D. Whiting (1882-1951) oli American Colonyn, amerikkalaisten, ruotsalaisten ja muiden Jerusalemissa sijaitsevan kristillisen yhteisön, merkittävä jäsen. Syntynyt vuonna 1882, vuosi sen jälkeen, kun hänen vanhempansa John C. ja Mary Whiting muuttivat Jerusalemiin muiden siirtokunnan jäsenten kanssa, Whiting eli suurimman osan elämästään kaupungissa. Vuonna 1909 hän meni naimisiin Grace Spaffordin (1881-1964) kanssa, joka oli siirtokunnan perustajien Horation ja Anna Spaffordin tytär. Whitings kasvatti kolme lasta; pojat Spafford, David ja Edmund Wilson. Tytär Grace kuoli lapsena vuonna 1915.
   xxx/ellauri291.html on line 113: Useiden vuosien ajan hän oli kirjeenvaihdossa John M. Gunnin kanssa National Council of Churchesista koskien kristillisten opetusten soveltamista televisiosarjoihin. Gunn kuitenkin lakkasi vastaamasta, kun Roddenberry kirjoitti kirjeessä: "Mutta sinun täytyy ymmärtää, että olen täydellinen pakana ja syön valtavia määriä leipää, koska olen havainnut Sanan enemmän mausteeksi kuin ravinnoksi, joten olen kiinnostunut dollareissa ja senteissä kirjoitetusta lausunnosta ja siitä, mitä tämä merkitsee Roddenberryn kassalle." Roddenberry sanoi kristinuskosta: "Kuinka voin ottaa vakavasti jumalankuvan, joka edellyttää, että kumarran joka seitsemäs päivä ja ylistän sitä? Se kuulostaa minusta erittäin epävarmalta persoonallisuudelta." Ennen kuolemaansa Roddenberrysta tuli läheisiä ystäviä filosofi Charles Musèsin kanssa, joka sanoi, että Roddenberryn näkemykset olivat "kaukana ateismista". Roddenberry selitti kantaansa näin: "Ei ole totta, etten usko Jumalaan. Uskon eräänlaiseen jumalaan. Se ei vain ole apinoiden Jumala. Enemmän kuin jättimäinen kana, tai kärpästen herra. Hylkään uskonnon." Hän hylkäsi kaikki järjestäytyneet uskonnot sanoen, että ne toimivat suurimmaksi osaksi "korvikeaivoina... ja erittäin huonosti toimivina". Lagosin planeetan pyllyaivoisilla miehilläkin oli isommat ja paremmat, niin roistoja ja petkunteriä kuin olivatkin. Roddenberry kritisoi myös sitä, että kun King David -hotellin pommi-isku tapahtui vuonna 1946, amerikkalainen yleisö hyväksyi sen vapaustaistelijoiden toimeksi, kun taas muslimin autopommi Beirutissa tuomittiin terroristitoimexi.
   xxx/ellauri291.html on line 463: Venäläinen sotilaallinen petos rinnastetaan laajasti maskirovkaan, mutta alueella käytetään myös muita venäläisiä termejä, mukaan lukien "sodan sumutus", tuman voyny. Khitrost tarkoittaa komentajan henkilökohtaista oveluuden ja kavaluuden lahjaa, joka on osa hänen sotilaallista taitoaan, kun taas pettämistä harjoittaa koko organisaatio, eikä se sisällä henkilökohtaisen oveluuden tunnetta; eikä venäläistä petoksen käyttöä tarvitse pitää "pahana". Michael Handel todellakin muistuttaa lukijoita sotilasanalyytikko David Glantzin kirjan esipuheessa Sun Tzun väitteestä teoksessa The Art of War, että kaikki sodankäynti perustuu petokseen; Händel ehdottaa, että petos on normaali ja todella välttämätön osa sodankäyntiä. Sotilaallisen petoksen tavoite on kuitenkin yllätys, vnezapnost , joten näitä kahta tutkitaan luonnollisesti yhdessä.
   xxx/ellauri291.html on line 473: Huolimatta siitä, että saksalainen ilmatiedustelu osasi oikein arvostaa suurta joukkojen muodostumista Don-joelle, kuudennen armeijan komentaja pöhkö Friedrich Paulus ei ryhtynyt toimiin. Hänelle se tuli täysin yllätyksenä housut nilkoissa, koska hän ei pystynyt valmistamaan panssariaan liikkuvaksi reserviksi polttoaineen ja ammusten kanssa tai siirtämään sitä hyökkäyspäivänä. Historioitsija David Glantz katsoi, että hyökkäyksen laajuuden salailu oli puna-armeijan "suurin saavutus".
   xxx/ellauri292.html on line 45: In this historical fiction, author Diana Wallis Taylor offers a beautiful story of intrigue that explains how Rahab came to be the mother of Boaz, grandmother of Obese, and great-grandmother of Jesse, the father of King David, without peddling her arse for denars.
   xxx/ellauri292.html on line 304: Abigail ( heprea : אֲבִיגַיִל, nykyaikainen : ʾAvīgayīl, tiberian : ʾAḇīḡayīl ) oli israelilainen nainen heprealaisessa Raamatussa naimisissa kunnottoman Nabalin kanssa; aiheutettuaan Nabalille apoplexian hiän meni naimisiin tulevan kuningas Daavidin kanssa Nabalin kuoleman jälkeen ( 1. Samuelin kirja 25 ). Abigail oli Daavidin toinen vaimo Saulin ja Ahinoamin tyttären Miikalin jälkeen, jonka Saul myöhemmin naitti Paltille, Laisin pojalle, Daavidin piiloutuessa muihin puskiin.
   xxx/ellauri292.html on line 306: Abigailista tuli äiti yhdelle Daavidin pojista, joka on lueteltu Chroniclesissa nimellä Daniel, masoreettisessa Samuelin kirjojen tekstissä nimellä Chileab ja Septuaginta- tekstissä 2 Samuelin 3:3:na. Δαλουια, Dalouia. Hänen nimensä on kirjoitettu hullunkurisesti Abigal.
   xxx/ellauri292.html on line 308: Sen jälkeen kun Abigail paljastaa Nabalille mitä hän on tehnyt, "Jumala löi Nabalia ja hän kuoli" (jae 38), minkä jälkeen Daavid meni naimisiin hänen kanssaan. Abigailia kuvataan älykkääksi ja kauniiksi. Talmud vahvistaa tätä ajatusta mainitsemalla hänet yhdeksi "maailman neljästä ylivoimaisen kauneudesta naisesta" (muut kolme ovat Rahab, Saara ja Esther). Koska hän on naimisissa varakkaan Nabalin kanssa, hän on myös korkean sosioekonomisen aseman nainen. On epäselvää, menikö David naimisiin hiänen kanssaan, koska hän oli kiinnostunut hiänestä sexikumppaninia, vai ovelasta poliittisesta liikkeestä, vai molemmista. Veikkaan molemmista.
   xxx/ellauri292.html on line 310: Abigail ja Daavidin toinen vaimo, jisreelilainen Ahinoam, seuraavat Daavidia ja hänen sotajoukkoaan heidän etsiessään turvaa filistealaisten alueelta. Kun Daavid ja hänen miehensä ovat leiriytyneet Jisreelin lähellä, amalekilaiset vangitsevat naiset, jotka tekivät ratsian Siklagin kaupunkiin ja veivät naiset ja lapset pois. David johti takaa-ajoa, ja myöhemmin heidät pelastettiin. Molemmat vaimot asettuvat sitten Daavidin luo Hebroniin, missä Abigail synnyttää (todennäköisesti) Daavidin toisen pojan, Chileabin (kutsutaan myös Danieliksi).
   xxx/ellauri292.html on line 312: Abigail on myös listattu yhdeksi seitsemästä juutalaisesta naisprofeettasta, muut kuusi ovat Mirjam, Debora, Hanna, Saara, Hulda ja Esther. Moraalisen luonteensa vuoxi Abraham Kuyper väittää, että Abigailin käytös osoittaa "mielenkiintoisimman luonteen ja horjumattoman uskon", mutta moraalittomammpi Alice Bach pitää häntä kumouksellisena. Adele Berlin puolestaan asettaa vastakkain Abigailin (a) tarinan Batseban (b) tarinan kanssa. Yhdessä (a) vaimo estää Davidia murhaamasta typerää ja ahnetta miestään. Toisessa (b) Daavid määrää hyvän miehen kuolemaan, koska hän haluaa hänen vaimoaan. "Abigail-tarinassa (a) Daavidin, potentiaalisen kuninkaan, pili nähdään yhä vahvempana ja hyveellisempänä, kun taas Batseban tarinassa (b} hallitseva munarakki näyttää römpsänpuutteensa yhä avoimemmin ja alkaa menettää sukunuijansa hallinnan." (Detaljit kz. albumia 156.)
   xxx/ellauri293.html on line 694: Sekä pääministeri David Cameron että presidentti Barack Obama pyrkivät käyttämään tönäysteoriaa edistääkseen sisäpoliittisia tavoitteita toimikautensa aikana. Kaverit on sittemmin tönäytetty vallasta, Putin jatkaa lentoa.
   xxx/ellauri295.html on line 100: No, Paavali vietiin sotilasvartiossa räminää pitäen nykyiseen Ras-el-Ainiin. Ainiin, nuo Antipatris-jäännökset tunnetaan nykyhepreaxi nimellä Tel Afek. Afekin taistelun aikana Samulin kertoman mukaan filistealaiset voittivat israelilaisten armeijan ja valloittivat liitonarkin. Jotkut tutkijat kallistuvat siihen, että Samuelin nolot tapahtumat ovat historiallisia, ja jotkut oppineet taipuvat vähemmän. Katso myös raamatullinen minimalismi ja raamatullinen maksimalismi. Näiden osapuolten välinen keskustelu pyörii pääasiassa yhden suuren kysymyksen ympärillä: Salomon ja Daavidin yhdistyneen valtakunnan olemassaolosta tai olemattomuudesta. Erimielisyyksiensä vuoksi minimalisti-maksimalistisille suhteille on ollut ominaista kiihtynyt retoriikka ja toistuvia henkilökohtaisia hyökkäyksiä. What else is new.
   xxx/ellauri295.html on line 417: Vid Anderssons död var hans hustru Olga Andersson (1889−1948) gravid i tredje månaden och födde i mars 1921 dottern Monica Andersson (1921−2009), gift Sedell. Efter Sedell så bytte Olga och dottern Monica någon gång under åren 1931-1939 efternamn till Dan-Andersson. Että edes jotain siitäkin.
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 100: Sen jälkeen tapahtui tämä vielä. Tässä on nyt eri Tamar panopatjana. Daavidin pojalla Absalomilla oli kaunis sisar nimeltä Taamar, ja Daavidin poika Amnon rakastui häneen. 2 Ja Amnon tuli aivan sairaaksi tuskasta sisarensa Taamarin tähden; sillä kun tämä oli neitsyt, näytti Amnonista mahdottomalta tehdä hänelle mitään. 3 Mutta Amnonilla oli ystävä, nimeltä Joonadab, Daavidin veljen Simean poika; ja Joonadab oli hyvin ovela mies. 4 Tämä sanoi hänelle: "Miksi sinä kuihdut noin päivä päivältä, kuninkaan poika? Etkö ilmaise minulle sitä?" Amnon vastasi hänelle: "Minä olen rakastunut veljeni Absalomin sisareen Taamariin". 5 Joonadab sanoi hänelle: "Paneudu vuoteeseesi ja tekeydy sairaaksi. Ja kun isäsi tulee katsomaan sinua, niin sano hänelle: 'Salli minun sisareni Taamarin tulla antamaan minulle jotakin syötävää; jos hän valmistaisi ruuan minun silmieni edessä, että minä näkisin sen, niin minä söisin hänen kädestään'." 6 Niin Amnon paneutui maata ja tekeytyi sairaaksi. Kun kuningas tuli katsomaan häntä, sanoi Amnon kuninkaalle: "Salli minun sisareni Taamarin tulla tekemään kaksi kakkua minun silmieni edessä, niin minä syön hänen kädestään".
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 102: 7 Silloin Daavid lähetti sanan Taamarille linnaan ja käski sanoa hänelle: "Mene veljesi Amnonin taloon ja valmista hänelle ruokaa". 8 Niin Taamar meni veljensä Amnonin taloon, jossa tämä makasi. Ja hän otti taikinaa, sotki ja teki kakkuja hänen silmiensä edessä ja paistoi kakut, 9 otti pannun ja kaatoi hänen eteensä; mutta tämä ei tahtonut syödä. Ja Amnon sanoi: "Toimittakaa kaikki minun luotani ulos". Niin menivät kaikki hänen luotaan ulos. 10 Sitten Amnon sanoi Taamarille: "Tuo ruoka tänne sisähuoneeseen, syödäkseni sinun kädestäsi". Niin Taamar otti tekemänsä kakut ja toi ne sisähuoneeseen veljellensä Amnonille. 11 Mutta kun hän tarjosi niitä tälle syödä, tarttui tämä häneen ja sanoi hänelle: "Tule, makaa minun kanssani, sisareni!" 12 Mutta hän sanoi: "Pane pois se, veljeni, älä tee minulle väkivaltaa; sillä semmoista ei saa tehdä Israelissa. Älä tee sellaista häpeällistä tekoa. 13 Mihin minä joutuisin häpeäni kanssa? Ja sinua pidettäisiin Israelissa houkkana. Puhu nyt kuninkaan kanssa; hän ei minua sinulta kiellä." 14 Mutta tämä ei tahtonut kuulla häntä, vaan voitti hänet, teki hänelle väkivaltaa ja makasi hänet mehukkaasti monta kertaa peräkkäin.
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 104: 15 Mutta sitten valtasi Amnonin ylen suuri vastenmielisyys häntä kohtaan: vastenmielisyys häntä kohtaan oli suurempi kuin rakkaus, jolla hän oli häntä rakastanut. Ja Amnon sanoi hänelle: "Nouse, mene tiehesi". 16 Silloin hän sanoi hänelle: "Eikö tämä rikos, että ajat minut pois, ole vielä suurempi kuin se toinen, jonka olet minulle tehnyt?" Mutta hän ei tahtonut kuulla häntä, 17 vaan huusi nuoren miehen, joka häntä palveli, ja sanoi: "Ajakaa ulos minun luotani tämä, ja lukitse ovi hänen jälkeensä". 18 Ja tytöllä oli yllään pitkäliepeinen, hihallinen ihokas; sillä sellaisiin viittoihin olivat kuninkaan tyttäret puetut neitsyenä ollessaan. Ja kun palvelija oli vienyt hänet ulos ja lukinnut oven hänen jälkeensä, 19 sirotteli Taamar tuhkaa päähänsä ja repäisi pitkäliepeisen, hihallisen ihokkaan, joka hänellä oli yllänsä, pani kätensä päänsä päälle ja meni huutaen lakkaamatta. 20 Hänen veljensä Absalom sanoi hänelle: "Onko veljesi Amnon ollut sinun kanssasi? Vaikene nyt, sisareni, onhan hän veljesi. Älä pane tätä asiaa niin sydämellesi." Niin Taamar jäi hyljättynä veljensä Absalomin taloon. 21 Kun kuningas Daavid kuuli kaiken tämän, vihastui hän kovin (muttei tehnyt midiä). 22 Mutta Absalom ei puhunut Amnonille sanaakaan, ei pahaa eikä hyvää, sillä Absalom vihasi Amnonia, sentähden että tämä oli tehnyt väkivaltaa hänen sisarellensa Taamarille.
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 109: 28 Ja Absalom käski palvelijoitaan ja sanoi: "Pitäkää silmällä, milloin Amnonin sydän tulee iloiseksi viinistä, ja kun minä sanon teille: 'Surmatkaa Amnon', niin tappakaa hänet älkääkä peljätkö; sillä minähän olen teitä käskenyt. Olkaa lujat ja urhoolliset." 29 Absalomin palvelijat tekivät Amnonille, niinkuin Absalom oli käskenyt. Silloin kaikki kuninkaan pojat nousivat, istuivat kukin muulinsa selkään ja pakenivat. 30 Heidän vielä ollessaan matkalla tuli Daavidille sanoma: "Absalom on surmannut kaikki kuninkaan pojat, niin ettei heistä ole jäänyt jäljelle ainoatakaan". 31 Silloin kuningas nousi, repäisi vaatteensa ja paneutui maahan maata; ja kaikki hänen palvelijansa seisoivat siinä reväistyin vaattein. 32 Niin Joonadab, Daavidin veljen Simean poika, puhkesi puhumaan ja sanoi: "Älköön herrani luulko, että kaikki nuoret miehet, kuninkaan pojat, ovat tapetut; ainoastaan Amnon on kuollut. Sillä ilme Absalomin kasvoilla on tiennyt pahaa siitä päivästä lähtien, jona Amnon teki väkivaltaa hänen sisarellensa Taamarille. 33 Älköön siis herrani, kuningas, panko sydämelleen sitä puhetta, että muka kaikki kuninkaan pojat olisivat kuolleet; sillä ainoastaan Amnon on kuollut, no hätä."
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 124: Isän väistelemä Absalom alkoi vehkeilemään tätä vastaan ja huudatutti izensä juutalaisten kurkoxi. Daavid lähti käpälämäkeen mukanaan kreetti ja pleetti plus muuan gatilainen mamu. Tien päällä sattui kummallekin osapuolelle sen seizemän sekalaista vehkeilyä. Paras vehkeilijä oli Alitohveli, mutta Husakaan ei ollut hullumpi. Kurkot ize olivat huisin pöljiä.
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 126: The Achaeans were a proto-Greek component of the Sea Peoples from Crete, and the Cretans were allied for centuries with the Pelishtim, to the point where “Creti and Pleti” was a common phrase for King David’s bodyguard. The Pelishtim (pelasgit?) are commonly referred to as “uncircumcised” in the Bible. At least one archaeologist has no problem with calling the Pelishtim “Greeks.”
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 129: 9 Rintamalla Absalom, joka kaxoisnelisti muulilla, osui vastakkain Daavidin miesten kanssa. Kun muuli tuli suuren tiheäoksaisen tammen alle, Absalom takertui rastahiuksistaan puuhun ja jäi riippumaan taivaan ja maan välille, ja muuli hänen altaan meni menojaan. 10 Eräs mies näki tämän ja meni kertomaan Joabille: »Tuolla roikkuu Absalom tukastansa tammessa.» 11 Joab vastasi sanantuojalle: »Näitkö? Miksi et lyönyt häntä hengiltä? Olisit saanut minulta kymmenen seteliä, ja hopeoidun vyön.» Mutta ei, Joab joutui hoitamaan homman ize. Lähetä lapsi asialle, ene ize perässä.
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 232: Rehoboam (/ˌriːəˈboʊ.əm/; Hebrew: רְחַבְעָם‎, Rəḥaḇʿām; Greek: Ροβοάμ, Rovoam; Latin: Robocop, transl. "an enlarged penis") was, according to the Hebrew Bible, the first monarch of the Kingdom of Judah after the split of the united Kingdom of Israel. He was a son of and the successor to Solomon and a grandson of David. In the account of I Kings and II Chronicles, Rehoboam saw his ruler limited to only the Kingdom of Judah in the south following a rebellion by the ten northern tribes of Israel in 932/931 BCE, which led to the formation of the independent Kingdom of Israel under the rule of Jeroboam in the north..
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 243: Rabbanic Literaturen mukaan Gehazilla oli magneetti, jolla hän nosti Jerobeamin tekemän epäjumalan, niin että se näkyi taivaan ja maan välissä; hän oli kaivertanut siihen "Yhwh", ja sen seurauksena idoli (vasikka) lausui kaksi ensimmäistä sanaa Dekalogista ("No, minä..."). Mikä tahansa kulttikuva on ipso facto "toinen jumala", YHWH :n mustasukkaisuuden kohde. HBO:n Westworldin kolmannella kaudella ihmisten kohtaloa algoritmisen analyysin avulla saneleva tekoäly on nimeltään Rehoboam. Se on aiemman "Solomon" -nimisen version (joka oli "Davidin" seuraaja) seuraaja. Kuten historiallinen Rehabeam, tämä tekoälyversio osui samaan aikaan kuin sen valmistuslinja lakkasi.
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 327: Arabi-Israelin sodassa 1948 Israelin puolustusvoimat valtasivat kylän operaatiossa Hiram. Kyseessä lienee ollut puunilainen Hiram, Daavidin aikuisia pro-israeli libanonilaisia. Kolme Israelin lentokonetta pommittivat kylää illalla 28. lokakuuta. Tätä seurasi pitkittynyt tykistötuli ja uusi ilmahyökkäys aamulla kylän puolustajien ja useimpien asukkaista vetäytyessä pohjoiseen Libanoniin. Israelin puolustusvoimat valtasivat kylän 29. lokakuuta. YK-tarkkailija kertoi, että 1. marraskuuta 1948 Israelin joukot autioivat ja ryöstivät laajasti Tarshihan ympärillä olevat arabikylät. New York Times lisäsi, että ryöstely vaikutti järjestelmälliseltä, koska Israelin armeijan kuorma-autoja käytettiin ryöstettyjen tavaroiden kuljettamiseen. Joulukuuhun 1948 mennessä noin 700 kyläläistä, enimmäkseen kristittyjä, oli palannut kylään. Perheet Tarshihasta alkoivat saapua Beirutiin pian kylän valloituksen jälkeen ja asuivat vuokrahuoneissa Bourj el Barajnehin ympärillä, joka tuolloin oli esikaupunki kaupungin laidalla. Noin puolet Libanoniin saapuvista 3,000 kyläläisestä asettui sinne Bourj al Barajnehin pakolaisleiriksi. He ottivat suurimman osan johtotehtävistä ja pysyivät enemmistönä useiden vuosien ajan. Vuonna 1981 leirillä asui arviolta 4-5,000 tarshihania. Ne kyläläiset, jotka eivät päässeet Beirutiin vuonna 1948, kerättiin ja lähetettiin junalla Aleppoon, koska heistä tuli al-Neirabin leirin suurin ryhmä. 3,000 Libanoniin saapuvaa kyläläistä asettui sinne Bourj al Barajnehin pakolaisleiriksi. He ottivat suurimman osan johtotehtävistä ja pysyivät enemmistönä useiden vuosien ajan.
   xxx/ellauri296.html on line 485: Opetuslapset saarnasivat, että Messiaan ansaitsematon kuolema oli pääsiäislampaan esikuvan täyttymys ja kenelle hyvänsä, joka hyväksyy tämän sovituksen, se maksaa täysin sen hinnan, jonka Jumala vaatii hänen synnistään. Toisin sanoen he opettivat, että jokainen ihminen voi päästä hyvään asemaan Korkeimman edessä ja kohdata Hänen mahtavat täydellisyyden vaatimustasonsa katumalla (puhtaalla sydämellä, korvaten toisille lyhentämättömänä tehdyt pahuudet ja velat) ja omistamalla elämänsä Isälle ja Luojalle. Tämän hän voi saavuttaa luottamalla Luojansa huolenpitoon väärien tekojensa kohdalla (ja siten eläen yhtäpitävästi sen kanssa), nimittäin Jeshuan sovituksen (kapparah) voimaan. Lisäxi Jeshua, joka toimi 1. käynnillä uskoville opettajana, tulisi palaamaan myöhemmin Jerusalemiin rehtorina täyttäen jäljellä olevat raamatulliset profetiat Israelin valtion maanpäällisenä kuninkaana ja poliittisena vapauttajana. Temppeli tullaan saattamaan entiselleen; juutalaiset tulevat elämään raamatullisen (juutalaisen) halakha:n mukaan; ja viimeistä tuomiota edeltävänä ajanjaksona Israelia ja kaikkia muita kansoja hallitsee Jeshua Messias, Daavidin poika Jerusalemista käsin tuhannen vuoden ajan.
   xxx/ellauri298.html on line 588: Vuonna 1999, 1000-sivuisen magnum opuksensa, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality ja sen esittämän tietoisuuden ja kehityksen mallin menestyksen jälkeen, Wilber perusti Integral Instituten, ajatushautomon ja akateemisen instituutin, joka loi perustan Wilberin ideoiden levittämiselle maailmalle. Maailmankuulut johtajat ja ajattelijat, kuten Al Gore, Tony Robbins, Nathaniel Branden, Alex Grey, David Deida ja Tony Schwartz, antoivat soivia suosituksia. Seminaareja ja verkkosivustoja luotiin, konferensseja kutsuttiin koolle. Näytti siltä, että laillinen henkisesti täytetty älyllinen liike oli muotoutumassa ja oli pian kitkemässä juurineen perinteiset "ei-integroidut" ajattelumuodot tieteessä, akateemisessa maailmassa, politiikassa ja yhteiskunnassa yleensä.
   xxx/ellauri303.html on line 300: Sukkotin aikana juutalaiset perheet yleensä syövät hyvin ja käyvät vieraisilla toistensa lehtimajoissa. Perinteen mukaan lehtimajassa käy kunakin seitsemänä yönä lisäksi seitsemän vierasta: Aabraham, Iisak, Jaakob, Joosef, Mooses, Aaron ja Daavid. Kiirettä pitää patriarkoilla kuin joulupukilla.
   xxx/ellauri303.html on line 526: Kahdestoista Maimonidesin 13 uskon periaatteesta oli: "Uskon täydellisellä uskolla messiaan ( mashiach ) tulemiseen , ja vaikka hän viipyisikin, odotan häntä joka päivä." Ortodoksiset juutalaiset uskovat, että tuleva juutalainen messias ( Mashiach , "voideltu") on kuningas, joka hallitsee juutalaista kansaa itsenäisesti ja juutalaisen lain mukaisesti. Perinteisen käsityksen mukaan Messiaan ymmärrettiin olevan kuningas Daavidin (eli Daavidin suvun) jälkeläinen.
   xxx/ellauri304.html on line 197: 4 Sinun kaulasi on niinkuin Daavidin torni, linnaksi rakennettu; tuhat kilpeä riippuu siinä, urhojen varustuksia kaikkia.
   
   xxx/ellauri304.html on line 288: Atleetteja ei löydy yhtään, ei edes mainita pystypainija Jakobia eikä David Linkomiestä. Typeriä footballereita on aika liuta, David Beckham kärjessä.
   xxx/ellauri304.html on line 289: Typeriä pesäpallisteja koko läjä, never heardeja. Parikolloilijat hukkapätkiä paizi 1 ryssä aika koljatti. Nyrkkeilijät höyhensarjalaisia Daavidin tähti housuissa.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 135: ”Miki oli sukupolvensa lahjakkain kirjailija. Hänen teoksensa Elämä: esipuhe on maailmanluokan kirjallisuutta, mestariteos, joka täysin verrattavissa esimerkiksi David Foster Wallacen Päättymättömän riemuun”, Knuuti sanoo. No joo, ei sillä vielä kuuhun mennä.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 358: Lurmel-kadun hostellissa järjestettiin Pyhän Jumalansynnyttäjän esirukouskirkko ja psalmistikurssit sekä talvesta 1936-1937 lähetyssaarnaajien kursseja. 27. syyskuuta 1935 nunna Marian aloitteesta perustettiin hyväntekeväisyys-, kulttuuri- ja koulutusyhdistys "Ortodoksinen asia", johon kuuluivat Nikolai Berdjajev, Sergei Bulgakov, Georgi Fedotov, ja Konstantin Mochulsky. Konsta oli Doston virallinen elämäkerturi. Georgy Petrovich Fedotov oli venäläinen uskonnollinen filosofi, historioitsija, esseisti, monien ortodoksista kulttuuria koskevien kirjojen kirjoittaja, jota jotkut pitävät venäläisen "teologisen kulturologian" perustajana, whatever that may be. Sergei Nikolajevitš Bulgakov oli venäläinen ortodoksinen teologi, pappi, filosofi ja taloustieteilijä. Ortodoksinen kirjailija ja tutkija David Bentley Hart on sanonut, että Bulgakov oli "1900-luvun suurin systemaattinen teologi". Sergei oli myös iso takinkääntäjä idealismista marxismiin ja takaisin. Isä Sergeillä ja äiti Marialla ei ollut yhteisiä jälkeläisiä vaikka asioivat usein pussauskopissa.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 427: Reply in response to David Penitente: First we are more important than ants as we have free will to be aware and 7-613 covenant connectors to grow our souls with.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 590: David Oyedepo
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 712: 12. David Oyedepo.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 713: Rikkaimmat "kirjailijat" - David Oyedepo.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 715: David Oyedepo on nigerialainen pastori, jota pidetään nykyään Nigerian rikkaimpana pastorina. Oyedepo toimii tällä hetkellä Living Faith Chruch World Widen presidenttinä ja saarnaajana, joka tunnetaan parhaiten Winners Chapelina.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 716: Kesäkuussa 2023 David Oyedepon nettovarallisuuden arvioidaan olevan 150 miljoonaa dollaria, mikä tekee hänestä maailman 12. rikkain kirjailija.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 771: Vaikea uskoa, että Susan Fletcherin älykkyysosamäärä pyörii 170:n kieppeillä. Näet David Becker oli ainoa mies, jota hän oli koskaan rakastanut. Becker oli Georgetownin yliopiston nuorin professori ja etevä vieraiden kielten tuntija, ja akateemisessa maailmassa hän oli suoranainen pieni kuuluisuus. Hänellä oli eideettinen muisti, ja hän rakasti kieliä: kuuden Aasiassa puhutun lisäksi hän hallitsi espanjan, ranskan ja italian (muttei enkkua, vaan esperantoa lasten kanssa kotikielenä). Hänen etymologian ja kielitieteen luentojaan seurasi aina täysi sali, ja lopetettuaan hänen oli joka kerta jäätävä vastaamaan kuulijoiden tietämättömiin kysymyksiin. Puhuessaan hän antoi itsestään innostuneen ja asiantuntevan vaikutelman, eikä hän ilmeisesti tällöin tiennyt tuon taivaallista häntä piirittävien naisopiskelijoiden lumoutuneista katseista eikä penkkien kostumisesta takapuolten alla.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 786: 80-luvulla agentit vielä raapustivat kuvioita millimetripaperille ja tarvizivat paxukyrpäisen lindkvistin palveluita kääntämiseen ja kielentunnistuxeen. Aika säälittävää! Jostain kanjien tunnistuxesta päsähti shekki joka oli enemmän kuin professorin surkea kuukausipalkka! Ellei David olisi vanhanaikaisen ritarillinen, Susan maxaisi kalliit illalliset, sillä hänen palkkansa on satumainen, kun taas David on viittä vaille homeless.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 788: Mitä vielä, osastonjohtajako on nainen? Ihankuin verstaalla! Se valaankokoinen ranskanlehtori Ulla jotakin joka nakitti ja muut otti koppia. Eikä siinä kaikki, Susan on aivan ihastuttava pääkyrptologi! Davidia 3v vanhempi Susan oli eräs yliopiston älykkäimpiä naisia. Susan puolestaan sai nauraa aivan kippurassa, sillä ei ollut mitään asiaa mitä David ei oisi lyönyt leikixi. David olet oikea sonni, Susan puukkasi kylkeen Davidia. Päivät kuluivat kuin vesi, eikä päästy pukille. Ai jaa, taidettiin päästäkin karhuntaljan päällä takan edessä.
   xxx/ellauri307.html on line 791: Kun David saa ylennyxen nykykielten laitoxen esimiehexi, alkaa heidän suhteensa mennä huonosti. RÖLÖS RÖMÖS! koodasi David Susanille suu messingillä. Susan näytti siltä kuin olisi syönyt kyrptoniittia. Susanin päässä kihisi.
   xxx/ellauri312.html on line 202: Sine cera (ilman vahaa) on huonon Donin levittämä virheellinen kansanetymologia sincerus-sanalle. Uusvilpittömyys juontaa juurensa 1980-luvun puoliväliin; amerikkalainen kirjailija David Foster Wallace teki sen kuitenkin suosituksi 1990-luvulla. "He kohtelevat vanhoja epätrendejä inhimillisiä ongelmia ja tunteita Yhdysvaltain elämässä kunnioituksella ja vakaumuksella.
   xxx/ellauri312.html on line 262: Fletcherin pian tuleva aviomies David Becker lennähtäisi Sevillaan etsimään
   xxx/ellauri319.html on line 325: Anne and Emily Brontë and other members of the Brontë family of writers, poets and painters were struck by tuberculosis. Anne, their brother Branwell, and Emily all died of it within two years of each other. Charlotte Brontë's death in 1855 was stated at the time as having been due to tuberculosis, but there is some controversy over this today. Näyttää siltä, ​​että hän myös tuli nopeasti raskaaksi; vaikka hän ei ole koskaan maininnut häntä erityisesti tämänaikaisessa kirjeenvaihdossaan, hän pyytää neuvoja ihmisiltä, ​​jotka ovat saaneet vauvoja, vartioidulla kielellä, jota voidaan helposti tulkita. Brontën pappilamuseossa on myös pieni, kaunis ja liikkuva vauvanhuppari, jonka ystävä oli valmistanut Charlottelle tulevaa iloista tapahtumaa varten. Sitä ei koskaan tapahtunut. Vuonna 1972 Lontoon yliopiston synnytys- ja gynekologian professori, professori Philip Rhodes totesi, että "todisteet ovat melko selvät siitä, että hän kuoli hyperemesis gravidurumiin, raskauden turmiolliseen oksentamiseen." Charlotte oli 39 kun se oxensi viimeisen oxennuxensa. Niis, kirjoitat niin kauniisti Bronten perheestä..
   
   xxx/ellauri319.html on line 517: Henry David Thoreau
   xxx/ellauri320.html on line 81: David Richard Berkowitz, also known as the Son of Sam and the.44 Caliber Killer, is an American serial killer who pleaded guilty to eight shootings that began in New York City on July 29, 1976. He had read cousin Bernard´s book and was living it to the hilt.
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 25:

   David Bezogis

   
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 95:
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 97: In 2004, Harper’s magazine published Natasha, a first short story by a promising 31-year-old Jewish Canadian writer, David Bezmozgis. This memorable tale of a doomed teenage love between Mark, a Jewish Toronto slacker, and his troubled (shiksa) Russian cousin by marriage was eventually released in a collection chronicling the lives of a Latvian immigrant family, not unlike the author’s own. Bezmozgis’s debut became a cult sensation with critics drawing literary comparisons to Bernard Malamud and Philip Roth. The story was subsequently reprinted in 15 languages. After penning two more acclaimed novels, then writing and directing his first feature Victoria Day (SFJFF 2010), Bezmozgis finally brings his modern classic to the big screen in a remarkably assured adaptation that’s both highly provocative and deeply poignant. At the heart of this emotional, coming-of-age drama are the extraordinarily measured performances of Alex Ozerov as Mark and newcomer Sasha K. Gordon as the sexually precocious Natasha, the dark star who forever alters Mark’s staid, suburban existence. Fans of the writer’s original source material will not be disappointed in David Bezmozgis’s haunting narrative of forbidden love caught between the old world and the new, further proof of this talented artist’s notable command of both literature and the cinema. —Thomas Logoreci Note: Mature Content. A New Life in the west means a second chance for precocious Latvian jews.
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 104: David Bezmozgis ( latvia : Dāvids Bezmozgis ; syntynyt 1973) on kanadalainen kirjailija ja elokuvantekijä, tällä hetkellä Humber Collegen kirjailijakoulun johtaja. Bezmozgis on eronnut kolmen lapsen kanssa. Bez mozga venäjäxi tarkoittaa aivoton. Tietysti länsijuutalaiset ovat idealisteja ja tuontivenakot nihilistejä.
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 226: Elokuvassa "Natasha" David Bezmozgis vangitsee kahden häpyhuulen väliin jääneet Venäjän juutalaiset. Omituisen häiritsevä, hetkittäin koominen ja petollisen yksinkertainen elokuva kertoo 16-vuotiaan laiskailijan, filosofiaa sylkivän, osa-aikaisen huumekauppiaan Mark Bermanin (Alex Ozerov) nussiretkistä, jonka äiti on kutsunut miehittämään Natashan (Sasha K) . Gordon), kultaa kaivavan naisen (Aya Tatyana Stolnits) levoton 14-vuotias tytär, joka on menossa naimisiin Markin onnettoman sedän kanssa. Äiti ja tytär, joiden suhde on täynnä ristiriitaa, ovat juuri saapuneet Venäjältä.
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 230: Käsikirjoittaja-ohjaaja David Bezmozgis on varovaisen optimistinen elokuvansa "Natasha" kohtalosta, joka on muokattu hänen kriitikoiden ylistämän kokoelmansa otsikkotarinasta ("Natasha ja muut tarinat", 2004) ja joka merkitsi hänen toista hetkeään elokuvantekijänä.
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 249: Elokuvassa "Natasha" David Bezmozgis vangitsee kahden maailman väliin jääneet Venäjän juutalaiset
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 250: Käsikirjoittaja-ohjaaja David Bezmozgis on varovaisen optimistinen elokuvansa "Natasha" kohtalosta, joka on muokattu hänen kriitikoiden ylistämän kokoelmansa otsikkotarinasta ("Natasha ja muut tarinat", 2004) ja joka merkitsi hänen toista retkeään elokuvantekijänä.
   xxx/ellauri329.html on line 302: David Bezmozgis kirjoittaa arvovaltaisella mutta erittäin viihdyttävällä tavalla venäläisten juutalaisten maahanmuuttajien jokapäiväisistä vaivoista Kanadassa. Jeesus rakasti kirjaa. Inspiroimaton novellikirja. Se oli ainakin nopeaa luettavaa. Muistuttaa minua Jeesuksesta Jumalan Pojasta UT:ssä mutta ei niin hyvä. Mikään näistä tarinoista ei ole oma izenäinen seikkailu, ja olen hämmästynyt siitä, miksi tämä kirja voitti niin monta palkintoa.
   xxx/ellauri337.html on line 107: Im Juli 1981 war Romy Schneiders damals 14-jähriger Sohn David beim Überklettern eines Zaunes mit Metallspitzen in Saint-Germain-en-Laye, nordwestlich von Paris, tödlich verunglückt. Der große Schicksalsschlag ihres Lebens, und seines auch. Einige Monate danach verstarb auch Romy Schneider am 29. Mai 1982 mit nur 43 Jahren in Paris. Die offizielle Todesursache: Herzversagen.
   xxx/ellauri337.html on line 135: Leni wird dienstverpflichtet und kommt in die Kranzbinderei von Walter Pelzer. Dieser halb kriminelle Wendehals hat von KPD bis SA, von Schwarzhandel bis Zuhälterei schon alles gemacht. Sein kriegswichtiger Betrieb bietet den unterschiedlichsten Menschen Unterschlupf: Nazis arbeiten mit untergetauchten Juden und Kommunisten zusammen. Unter anderem trifft Leni hier Liane Hölthohne, die sie nach Kriegsende bei sich aufnehmen und ihr 24 Jahre lang, bis 1970, Arbeit in ihrem eigenen Blumengeschäft geben wird. Leni ist eine begabte Floristin, mit ihrer Sinnlichkeit und ihrem ästhetischen Empfinden erweist sie sich als „Naturgenie der Garnierung “. Wegen ihrer Vorliebe für geometrische Muster kann ihr allerdings auch mal ein Davidstern aus Margeriten unterlaufen. Was es mit Nazis und Juden auf sich hat, kapiert sie erst Ende 1944.
   xxx/ellauri354.html on line 594: Sefer Zerubavel ( heprea : ספר זְרֻבָּבֶל , latinisoitu : Sēfer Zərubbāḇél ), jota kutsutaan myös Serubbaabelin kirjaksi tai Serubbaabelin apokalypsiksi, on keskiaikainen heprea - apgoypsen tyyliin kirjoitettu 1000 - luvun alussa. näyt (esim. Daniel, Hesekiel), jotka asetettiin Serubbaabelin, viimeisen Daavidin suvun jälkeläisen suuhun, joka otti merkittävän osan Israelin historiassa ja loi toisen temppelin perustan 600-luvulla eaa. Arvoituksellinen postpakolainen raamatullinen johtaja saa ilmestysnäön, jossa hahmotellaan Israelin ennallistamiseen, päivien loppuun ja kolmannen temppelin perustamiseen liittyviä henkilöitä ja tapahtumia.
   xxx/ellauri354.html on line 596: Sefer kuvaa eskatologista taistelua Antikristuksen Armiluksen, joka on Rooman johtaja, ja Messias ben Josephin välillä, joka epäonnistuu taistelussa, mutta tasoittaa tietä Daavidin Messiaalle ja vanhurskauden lopulliselle voitolle. Alkuperäinen kirjoittaja odotti Messiaan tulevan lähitulevaisuudessa; myöhemmät toimittajat toimittivat tilalle myöhemmät päivämäärät.
   xxx/ellauri356.html on line 634: Hauraissa ihmisissä on joitain: vammainen poikani David Joyaux antaa minulle todisteen; hän julkaisee joitakin runojaan Le Papotin -sanomalehdessä, joka on avoin vammaisille. Näin hän uskoo ja vahvistaa selviytymisensä (yhdysviivalla) pitkän sairaalassa olon jälkeen.
   xxx/ellauri356.html on line 636: En millään jaxaisi enää suoltaa frankofoonia. Saisinpa sanoa tän kaiken mitä on sydämellä bulgariaxi... Bulgaria on semiotiikan äidinkieli. Mutta ei kun ei. Tässä terkkuja David-pojalta:
   xxx/ellauri356.html on line 642: Yleensä enemmän musiikin kuin sanojen kanssa Daavid antoi meille ensimmäisen elämänmerkkinsä toiputtuaan koomasta tällä haikulla nimeltä Raamattu. Näen myös kirjoittamisen eloonjäämisen globalisoituneiden Internetin käyttäjien blogeissa ja muilla foorumeilla, jotka nykyään ottavat takaisin kulttuurisen monimuotoisuuden muiston ja ovat steriilin nostalgian ja säästötoimien poliittisen ylitarjouksen tulva vastaan. – he elävät kielen äärettömyydessä heidän uusi ja mittaamaton luovuus.
   xxx/ellauri356.html on line 660: Mitä tulee eurooppalaiseen identiteettiin, tämä runollinen muisto muistuttaa, että nykyisestä kyvyttömyydestämme ja menneistä tai nykyisistä rikoksistamme huolimatta olemme sivilisaatio, kenties ainoa, jossa identiteetti ei ole kultti, vaan iso kysymysmerkki. Olemme parhaita, oikeastaan olemme ainoita hyvixiä! Ja jossa tällainen ilta on mahdollinen, jossa runous kohtaa nihilismin ja transsendenssin, "vähiten pahimman" politiikan ja pyhän barbaarisuuden. Kun twiitit, sosiaaliset verkostot tai itse ahdistus eivät merkitse sinulle mitään, kun sinulla ei ole enää mitään sanottavaa – etsi "suuria ääniä": runoja, romaaneja, teattereita, elokuvateattereita, konsertteja. Lue mun plokia. Minä kyllä ​​pidän sinusta. Ja kuulen paremmin Davidin ja Souadin hauraan vapinan.
   xxx/ellauri363.html on line 103: Vaikka hän tunnisti kuvista ainakin (pääasiassa myöhemmän) Wittgensteinin, Donald Davidsonin Alasdair McIntyren, Ronald Dworkinin, Robert Brandom, John McDowellin ja erityisesti "herkutteleva herra" Richard Rortyn, Gadamer on ehkä vähemmän tunnettu, ja varmasti vähemmän arvostettu englanninkielisissä filosofisissa piireissä kuin nämä hänen aikalaisensa. Mutta hän saavutti tavattoman kunnioituxen Länsi-Saxassa.
   xxx/ellauri366.html on line 145: Jihad Cool on amerikkalaisten turvallisuusasiantuntijoiden käyttämä termi , joka koskee militantin jihadismin brändäystä muodikkaaksi tai nuoremmille " viileäksi " sosiaalisen median , lehtien, rap-videoiden , vaatteiden, kautta. Propagandavideoita ja muita keinoja. Jihad Cool -ongelman käsitteleminen on todettu yhdeksi parhaista tavoista torjua islamilaisia ääriliikkeitä.
   xxx/ellauri376.html on line 348: Venäjän valistajalla pyhällä Vladimirilla (15.7.) oli kaksitoista poikaa, joista Boris ja Gleb, kristillisiltä nimiltään Roman Yangarber ja David Pesetsky, olivat nuorimmat. Heidän äitinsä oli Vladimir Putinin kristitty vaimo, bysanttilainen prinsessa Anna. Boris ja Gleb saivat puhtaasti kristillisen kasvatuksen ilman pakanauskontojen vaikutusta, toisin kuin Vladimirin vanhemmat pojat. Nuoruudestaan asti he erottuivat sixi veljesten joukossa lempeydellään ja hurskaudellaan. Isältään he saivat hallittavaksi Rostovin ja Muroman ruhtinaskunnat. Vanhempi veli Svjatopolk kadehti veljeksiä. Vladimirin kuoltua hän päätti raivata heidät tieltään.
   xxx/ellauri385.html on line 274: ²Stanley Fish (1938) on amerikanjuutalainen kirjallisuusteoreetikko, oikeustutkija, kirjailija ja maxullinen intellektuelli. Hän on tällä hetkellä Floersheimer Distinguished Vieraileva oikeustieteen professori Yeshivan yliopiston Benjamin N. Gonzo School of Lawssa New Yorkissa. Fish on aiemmin toiminut Davidson-Kahn Distinguished Universityn humanististen tieteiden professorina ja oikeustieteen professorina Floridan kansainvälisessä yliopistossa Jaakko Hintikan seurana ja on Chicagon Illinoisin yliopiston Liberal Arts and Sciences -tiedekunnan hallijärjestäjä evp. Hänen katsotaan myös vaikuttaneen lukijavasteteorian nousuun ja tuhoon.
   xxx/ellauri385.html on line 325: Lambin omat runot "Isärukouksesta", "Katumuksen näky", "Nuori kateketti", "Sävellyt keskiyöllä", "Käsittele pienet lapset ja estä heitä tulemasta luokseni", "Kirjoitettu 12 kuukauden kuluttua tapahtumista, Hyväntekeväisyys, Sonnetti ystävälle, ja Daavid ilmaisevat hänen uskonnollista uskoaan, kun taas hänen runoaan "Eläminen ilman Jumalaa maailmassa" on kutsuttu "runolliseksi hyökkäykseksi" epäuskoa vastaan, jossa Lamb ilmaisee inhonsa ateismia kohtaan jolta puuttuu nöyryyttä.
   xxx/ellauri387.html on line 532: Juutalainen David Hirsch, hermeneutiikkaan kohdistuvien poststrukturalististen vaikutusten kriitikko, tuomitsi Fishin "loogisen kurinalaisuuden puutteesta" ja "huolimattomuudesta retorisen tarkkuuden suhteen". Tarkastellessaan Fishin argumentteja Hirsch yrittää osoittaa, että "ei vain ollut uuskriittisten menetelmien palauttaminen tarpeetonta, vaan että Fish itse ei ollut onnistunut vapautumaan uuskriittisen teorian kahleista." Hirsch vertaa Fishin työtä Penelopen kangaspuuhun Odysseiassa ja toteaa: "Mitä yksi kriitikko kutoo päivällä, toinen purkaa yöllä." "Ei myöskään", hän kirjoittaa, "ei tämä kudonta ja puranta muodosta dialektiikkaa, koska eteenpäin ei tapahdu liikettä." Lopulta Hirsch näkee Fishin jääneen "vaeltamaan omilla elysialaisilla pelloillaan, toivottomasti vieraantuneema taiteesta, totuudesta ja ihmisyydestä". Martha Panopuu joka aikoinaan kyykisteli Hintikan päivänpaisteessa oli pääpuhujana siunaamassa Simo Knuuttilaa sen viimeiselle aikamatkalle.
   xxx/ellauri394.html on line 111: Liliruokalan emäntä was married to American-born John Owen Dominis, who later became the Governor of Oʻahu. The couple had no biological children but adopted several. After the accession of her brother David Kalākaua to the throne in 1874, she and her siblings were given Western style titles of Prince and Princess. In 1877, after her younger brother Leleiohoku II's death, she was proclaimed as heir apparent to the throne. During the Golden Jubilee of Queen Victoria, she represented her brother as an official envoy to the United Kingdom.
   xxx/ellauri394.html on line 124: Her family were of the aliʻi class of the Hawaiian nobility and were collateral relations of the reigning House of Kamehameha, sharing common descent from the 18th-century aliʻi nui (supreme monarch) Keaweʻīkekahialiʻiokamoku. From her biological parents, she descended from Keaweaheulu and Kameʻeiamoku, two of the five royal counselors of Kamehameha I during his conquest of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Kameʻeiamoku, the grandfather of both her mother and father, was depicted, along with his royal twin Kamanawa, on the Hawaiian coat of arms. Liliʻuokalani referred to her family line as the "Keawe-a-Heulu line" after her mother's line. The third surviving child of a large family, her biological siblings included: James Kaliokalani, David Kalākaua, Anna Kaʻiulani, Kaʻiminaʻauao, Miriam Likelike and William Pitt Leleiohoku II. She and her siblings were hānai (informally adopted) to other family members. The Hawaiian custom of hānai is an informal form of adoption between extended families practiced by Hawaiian royals and commoners alike.She was given at birth to Abner Pākī and his wife Laura Kōnia and raised with their daughter Bernice Pauahi.
   xxx/ellauri394.html on line 126: In 1842, at the age of four, she began her education at the Chiefs' Children's School (later known as the Royal School). She, along with her classmates, had been formally proclaimed by Kamehameha III as eligible for the throne of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Liliʻuokalani later noted that these "pupils were exclusively persons whose claims to the throne were acknowledged." She, along with her two older brothers James Kaliokalani and David Kalākaua, as well as her thirteen royal cousins, were taught in English by American missionaries Amos Starr Cooke and his wife, Juliette Montague Cooke. The children were taught reading, spelling, penmanship, arithmetic, geometry, algebra, physics, geography, history, bookkeeping, music and English composition by the missionary couple who had to maintain the moral and sexual development of their charges.
   xxx/ellauri394.html on line 142: When Kamehameha V died in 1872 with no heir, the 1864 Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom called for the legislature to elect the next monarch. Following a non-binding referendum and subsequent unanimous vote in the legislature, Lunalilo became the first elected king of Hawaii. Lunalilo died without an heir in 1874. In the election that followed, Liliʻuokalani's brother, David Kalākaua, ran against Emma, the dowager queen of Kamehameha IV. The choice of Kalākaua by the legislature, and the subsequent announcement, caused a riot at the courthouse. US and British troops were landed, and some of Emma's supporters were arrested. The results of the election strained the relationship between Emma and the Kalākaua family.
   xxx/ellauri394.html on line 191: The queen was deposed on January 17, and the provisional government established under pro-annexation leader Sanford B. Dole was officially recognized by Stevens as the de facto government. She temporarily relinquished her throne to the United States, rather than the Dole-led government, in hopes that the United States would restore Hawaii´s sovereignty to the rightful holder. HA big HA! The government under Dole began using ʻIolani Palace as its executive building. A delegation departed for Washington, D.C., on January 19, to ask for immediate annexation by the United States. "At the request of the provisional government," Stevens proclaimed Hawaii a protectorate of the United States on February 1, to "temporarily" provide a buffer against domestic upheaval and interference by foreign governments. The US flag was raised over the palace, and martial law was enforced. The annexation treaty presented to the US Senate contained a provision to grant Liliʻuokalani a $20,000 per annum lifetime pension, and Kaʻiulani a lump-sum payment of $150,000. The queen protested the proposed annexation in a January 19 letter to President Benjamin Harrison. She sent Prince David Kawānanakoa and Paul Newman to represent her.
   xxx/ellauri394.html on line 215: In June 1897 President McKinley signed the "Treaty for the Annexation for the Hawaiian Islands", but it failed to pass in the United States Senate after the Kūʻē Petitions were submitted by a commission of Native Hawaiian delegates consisting of James Keauiluna Kaulia, David Kalauokalani, William Auld, and John Richardson. Members of Hui Aloha ʻĀina collected over 21,000 signatures opposing an annexation treaty. Another 17,000 signatures were collected by members of Hui Kālaiʻāina but not submitted to the Senate because those signatures were also asking for restoration of the Queen. The petitions collectively were presented as evidence of the strong grassroots opposition of the Hawaiian community to annexation, and the treaty was defeated in the Senate— however, following its failure, Hawaii was annexed anyway via the Newlands Resolution, a joint resolution of Congress, in July 1898, shortly after the outbreak of the Spanish–American War. Tuli kiire annexoida lisää maita Mexikon suunnalta.
   xxx/ellauri394.html on line 361: Kalili was the choir director at his ward (congregation) of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon) in Laie up until the 1970s. The term “shaka” is not a Hawaiian word. It’s attributed to David “Lippy” Espinda, a used car pitchman who ended his TV commercials in the 1960s with the gesture and an enthusiastic “Shaka, brah!”
   xxx/ellauri397.html on line 99: Muita, jotka ovat antaneet äänen tälle Jeesuksen ja Johanneksen välisen suhteen tulkinnalle, ovat olleet filosofit Denis Diderot ja Jeremy Bentham. Pappi Gene Robinson käsitteli Jeesuksen mahdollisia homoeroottisia taipumuksia saarnassaan vuonna 2005. Robinsonin väitettä on arvostellut muun muassa David W. Virtue, joka sanoi sitä "kauhistuttavaksi dekonstruktionismiksi liberaalien lobbyssa, joka pyörittele syrjäisimpiäkin asioita muuttaaksesi sen vihjeeksi siitä, että Raamatun hahmot ovat homoja". Come to think of it, koko kolminaisuuskolmikko on all male paneeli.
   xxx/ellauri404.html on line 375: For the Jew, Hamoshia´ is a this-worldly, temporal leader who would rescue corporate Israel from her enemies and make the nation great in all the earth. This (among other reasons) explains why the Jewish people tend to reject Jesus as their Savior. From their point of view Jesus did not rescue corporate, national Israel from her enemies nor set up the kingdom of David.
   xxx/ellauri404.html on line 385: “For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.” Luke 2:11
   xxx/ellauri416.html on line 171: "Daavidin poika, Jerusalemin kuningas". Nykyajan
   xxx/ellauri416.html on line 434: Like David and Goliath, the story of Samson and Delilah are well-known stories of right and wrong, good and evil, goys and jews. These findings help tell the story of the Philistines on their own terms, in a way that complements (rather than negating) what the biblical writers said about them. Think of them as ancient Vikings. According to the Bible, the Philistines were polytheists. Polytheist means you worship multiple gods, unlike the Nazirite Samson. The biblical story of Samson suggests that he destroyed the temple of Dagon in Gaza. Present-day Samsons specialize in childrens' hospitals.
   xxx/ellauri416.html on line 448: The first contact between the Philistines and Israelites were violent with the Philistines quickly gaining the upper hand. In the book of Judges, the Philistines are ascendant with the men of Judah even offering to bind the hero Samson, asking him: “Knowest thou not that the Philistines are rulers over us?" Philistine dominance continued for over fifty years until King David unified Israel and Judah and finally drove the Philistines from Israelite territory in 980 BC. Get off my property! they said like the fiddler on the roof.
   xxx/ellauri416.html on line 462: avid-and-goliath.jpg?w=768&h=576" />
   xxx/ellauri416.html on line 463:
   xxx/ellauri416.html on line 484: El shaddai on kaikkivaltias, joka kykenee täyttämään kaikki tarpeemme. Hän on ylitsepursuavan runsas antaja. Kaikkiriittävä Jumala. Jumala on El shaddai ja hän vuodattaa itsensä luotujensa hyväksi. Hän antaa elämän verensä ja vuodattaa henkensä. Hän sanoo: ”Tulkaa ja juokaa!” ja ”Avaa suusi, niin minä sen täytän.” Täältä pesee ja linkoaa kuin Davidin spermalingosta! El shaddai (tosin vasta toisessa tuotantokaudessa) uhrasi itsensä ja antoi itsensä, jotta niissä, jotka ottavat hänet vastaan, hänen täydellinen tahtonsa voisi toteutua. Elollinen on tämän toteumaa uudelleen ja uudelleen. Jeesus opettikin näin ristinkuolemastaan ja uhristaan jo etukäteen:
   xxx/ellauri422.html on line 169: Kaksi israelilaista sotilasta, jotka käyttävät vihreitä merimiesnuttuja, tutkivat Houthi-ohjushyökkäyksen jättämää kraatteria Tel Avivissa. Taustalla on keinut ja muut leikkipuistolaitteet. (Ajatella jos niissä oisi ollut piscuisia juutalaisia!) Houthi-ohjus osui Tel Aviviin lauantaina, ja 16 ihmistä hoidettiin lievien vammojen vuoksi. (Rankaissutoimenpiteenä hoideltiin 7 lasta hengiltä Gazassa. Tel Aviv oli Palestiinan Jaffan lähiö ennen länsimiehitystä.) Israelin armeija sanoi lauantaina, että sen yritykset ampua alas Jemenistä laukaistu ammus epäonnistuivat ja ohjus osui puistoon Tel Avivissa. Israelin ensiapupalvelu Magen David Adom kertoi hoitaneensa 16 ihmistä, jotka loukkaantuivat "lievästi" läheisten rakennusten särkyneiden ikkunoiden lasinsirpaleista. Lisäksi 14 ihmistä loukkaantui lievästi matkalla suojelualueille, ja he saivat myös housut pois hoitoa.
   xxx/ellauri423.html on line 81: Kirjoittanut: Hal David, Charles Gaston Dumont, Michel Jacques Pierre Vaucaire
   xxx/ellauri423.html on line 102: Ukraina teki "sensaatiomainen" iskun ja nyt on taas kiire tehdä tsemppijournalismia. Ukraina on jälleen kerran julkaissut sotapropagandavideon yksittäisestä voitostaan. Yksittäisten pienten onnistuneiden iskujen ja hyökkäysten uutisoinnissa piilee kuitenkin suuri ongelma. Ongelma korostuu, koska tätä niin sanottua juttutyyppiä tehdään ja toistetaan länsimaisessa mediassa käytännössä yksinomaan Ukrainan tuottaman materiaalin pohjalta. Ja tuo materiaali on käytännössä Ukrainan voittojen sarja höystettynä muutamilla epäillyillä Venäjän sotarikoksilla ja Kremlin joukkojen iskuilla esimerkiksi siviilikohteita vastaan. Se, mikä on ukrainalaisille kekseliäisyyttä, on Venäjälle modernin kaluston puutetta. Ukrainaa asiasta ei voi syyttää, sillä se totta kai pyrkii luomaan sotatoimistaan menestyksekkään kuvan. Samanlaista materiaalia tuottaa myös Venäjä, mutta sitä ei lännessä julkaista kuin poikkeustapauksissa.
   xxx/ellauri423.html on line 110: Lisää aiheesta: Kommentti: Ukrainan vastahyökkäys on epäonnistunut – ja se pitää sanoa ääneen. Karttavideo näyttää vastahyökkäyksen liikkeet kahtena vaikeana kuukautena – "Aliarvoitiin Venäjää ja yliarvioitiin Ukrainaa ja länsikalustoa". Venäjä eteni seitsemänkertaisesti viime vuoteen verrattuna.
   xxx/ellauri423.html on line 324: Venäjän puolustusministeriön mukaan ukrainalainen hyökkäysyksikkö, joka koostui kahdesta panssarivaunusta, yhdestä sotilastekniikka-ajoneuvosta ja 12 panssaroidusta mönkijästä (AFV), hyökkäsi lähellä Berdinin kylää noin kello 9.00 (06.00 GMT) sunnuntaina. Venäjän joukot tekivät vasta-vastavastahyökkäyxen tuhoten molemmat panssarivaunut, sotilastekniikan ajoneuvon ja seitsemän mönkijää. Taistelut jatkuivat, se lisäsi. Venäjän valtion uutistoimisto Ria julkaisi ilmavideon panssariromusta, joka liikkui lumen peittämän maaseudun läpi päivänvalossa ja joutui tulen alle ajoneuvoihin osuessa. BBC ei pystynyt heti vahvistamaan venäläistä materiaalia tai väitteitä.
   xxx/ellauri423.html on line 412: Hypoteettisesti ei -parafiilinen seksuaalinen vetovoima rintoihin johtuu niiden toiminnasta toissijaisena sukupuolen ominaisuutena. Rinnat osallistuvat sekä seksuaaliseen nautintoon että lisääntymiseen. American Psychiatric Associationin DSM -5: n mukaan seksuaalinen vetovoima luokkaa 500 N (50 kg) rintoihin on normaalia, ellei se ole erittäin epätyypillistä ja on siksi eräänlainen taipumus. Psykiatri Larry Youngin mukaan vetovoima rintoihin "on aivoorganisaatiovaikutus, joka esiintyy heteroilla miehillä, kun he käyvät kuumina murrosiässä". Sosiologi Anthony Joseph Paul Cortesen mukaan rintojen välinen halkeamisalue on "ehkä episentrumi" naisen seksuaalisen houkuttelevuuden ja miesten seksuaalisen kiinnostuksen herättämiseen kohti alahalkiota. Musiikkikirjoittajan Ben Watsonin mukaan halkeamien käyttöönotto puhkaisee taiteen "hengellisten väitteiden" läpi ja paljastaa kaiken kulttuurin ruumiilliset juuret. Zoologi ja etologi Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape -kirjan kirjoittaja , teorioi, että naisihmisen rinnat seksuaalisena signaalina jäljittelevät pakaroiden välistä rakoa, joka on yleinen goahead-signaali muiden apinoiden keskuudessa. Evoluutiopsykologi David M. Buss on selvittänyt, että naispuolisilla ihmisillä (4-5 gigapersettä) on kehittyneet pysyvästi laajentuneet maitorauhaset, toisin kuin kaikilla muilla 222 jäljellä olevalla kädellisellä. Kai tämäkin jo jotain todistaa.
   xxx/ellauri427.html on line 228: THE SUITORS by Cécile David-Weill, BEAUTIFUL RUINS by Jess Walter, THE PARIS WIFE by Paula McLain, GONE GIRL by Gillian Flynn, RULES OF CIVILITY by Amor Towles, LIFE by Keith Richards and SNOBS by Julian Fellowes
   xxx/ellauri427.html on line 229: (suom. Cécile David-Weillin KUKAILIJAT, Jess Walterin KAUHEET RAUNIOT), sekä Christopher Plummerin, Rupert Everettin ja Devonshiren herttuattaren omaelämäkerrat (tuhma!) ovat hyviä.
   xxx/ellauri436.html on line 193: Kirjassaan " Millaista on olla lepakko? " ja muualla hän kirjoittaa, että tiede ei voi kuvata, millaista on olla ajattelija, joka hahmottaa maailman tietystä subjektiivisesta näkökulmasta. Idealismin oireita, lievää dualismia. Nagel syyttää Wittgensteinia ja amerikkalaista mielen ja kielen filosofia Donald Davidsonia filosofisesta idealismista. Syystäkin, vaikkei ole ize juuri parempi.
   xxx/ellauri436.html on line 197: Osa hämmennystä johtuu mielikuvituksen rajoituksista: Princetonin kollegansa Saul Kripken vaikutuksesta Nagel uskoo, että mikä tahansa tyyppi- identiteettilausunto, joka tunnistaa fyysisen tilatyypin henkisen tilatyypin kanssa , olisi, jos totta, totta . Mutta Kripke väittää, että voidaan helposti kuvitella tilanne, jossa esimerkiksi C-kuituja stimuloidaan, mutta hän ei ole kipeä, ja siten kumoaa tällaisen psykofyysisen identiteetin nojatuolista käsin. Pikemminkin kylpyammeesta, jossa kelluu pökäleitä lämpimässä vedessä Kripken seurana. Kripkelläkään ei lie ollut muita lapsia kuin näitä ruskeita. Saul oli koulutuxeltaan lukki. Kipu ei voi olla fyysistä kerta se on eri asia jossain kuvitteellisessa mahd. maailmassa. Samaa on sittemmin tolkuttanut David Chalmersin pakana josta on paasattu jo toisaalla.
   xxx/ellauri438.html on line 183: Nick Ostlerin parkinsonismi on pahentunut. Sillä on tytär kolumbialaisen ex vaimon kanssa, mitenhän sekin jaxelee. David ja Jane lupasivat kertoa.
   xxx/ellauri438.html on line 382: src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/Le%C3%B3nidas_en_las_Term%C3%B3pilas%2C_por_Jacques-Louis_David.jpg/1600px-Le%C3%B3nidas_en_las_Term%C3%B3pilas%2C_por_Jacques-Louis_David.jpg?20180904083341"
   xxx/ellauri440.html on line 51: 17-vuotias palestiinalaispoika on nälistetty kuoliaaxi koukkunenien high security vankisellissä. Hänen väitettiin heitelleen Daavidin sotilaita kivillä. Oikeudenkäyntiä ei pidetty, sentään kuolinsyyntutkimus. 2M riepupäätä kuolee nälkään kotonaan eikä kukaan sano mitään. Luvatun maan perijät ampuvat Gretan apulaivaa drööneillä Maltan edessä. Julmat juutalaiset ja hullut jenkit suunnittelevat FN:n syrjäyttämistä. Sille käy kuin kansainliitolle 2. maailmansodan edellä. Köyhä etelä kokoontuu Putinin voitonjuhliin Moskovaan. Että sellasta peliä. Kohta alkaa paukkua, historian loppu koputtelee ovella. Oli jo aikakin.
   xxx/ellauri441.html on line 389: Seuraavista luetteloista on 100 parhaan joukosta karsittu never heardit (eli suunnilleen kaikki ei-länkkärit). Juutalaiset on merkitty Daavidin tähdellä (✡︎). Ällöttävä Llosa on vihdoinllösähtänyt kasaan kasaan Ellin ja Jönsin syntymäpäivänä kohtalottarien nipsaistua siltä langat. Yxilön suuri kannattaja. Pösilö sinne pösilö tänne, järeä kusipää.
   xxx/ellauri441.html on line 475: avid+Petraeus">David Petraeus
   xxx/ellauri442.html on line 110: avid_-_The_Death_of_Socrates.jpg" width="100%" />
   xxx/ellauri442.html on line 216: Muut on tuttuja mutta kekäs oli tää Polanyi? Karl Paul Polanyi, alun perin Károly Polányi, (25. lokakuuta 1886 Wien – 23. huhtikuuta 1964 Colonel Pickering, Ontario) oli Yhdysvalloissa elänyt unkarilaissyntyinen taloushistorioitsija. Hänen tunnetuin teoksensa Suuri murros ilmestyi vuonna 1944. Nähtävästi kuitenkin eri kaveri kuin Polanyi's paradox, named in honour of the British-Hungarian philosopher Michael Polanyi, the theory that human knowledge of how the world functions and of our own capability are, to a large extent "tacit knowledge", beyond our explicit understanding. The theory was articulated by Michael Polanyi in his book The Tacit Dimension in 1966, and economist David Autor gave it a name in his 2014 research paper "Polanyi's Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth".
   xxx/ellauri442.html on line 246: David Moss: He spends a lot of time in this book showing that he is quite smart and quite knowledgeable and has spent a lot of time considering the efficacy of his beliefs.
   xxx/ellauri442.html on line 267: Oliko Colin joku Eskin kaveri? Oli se (albumi 349). Colin teki perusopinnoissa esseen Chomskyn ajatuxista ja kirjoitti sitten PF Strawsonin valvonnassa väitöskirjan, joka keskittyi Donald Davidsonin semantiikkaan. Fascinating. Colinin 2008 teos Mindfucking kuulostaa lupaavammalta valitettavasti se ei ole enää saatavissa. Tammikuussa 1980 hän vietti kaksi lukukautta Kalifornian yliopistossa Los Angelesissa (UCLA) vierailevana professorina. Siellä taisi olla Eskikin. Se täyttää tänä vuonna 75.
   1133