ellauri151.html on line 532: Moral antitheodicies are no good because god gets flushed down the toilet if he hasn't got his finger in every pie. Well Larza doesn't say it this directly, but implies as much. And that's not good in a theology thesis. So we have to go with concptual antitheodicy, if at all.
ellauri151.html on line 533: There are three traditions of conceptual antitheodicy: Kantian, Jamesian and Hamannian antitheodicies.
ellauri151.html on line 535: Kantian antitheodicies argue that theodicism oversteps the limits of moral and theoretical human reason. Älä yritäkään ymmärtää, olet liian tyhmä. Jätä homma experteille.

ellauri151.html on line 536: Jamesian antitheodicies emphasize that God and the world order must be reinterpreted in terms of practical and moral action and from a pluralist perspective that can account for experience and moral effort. Siis mitä?
ellauri151.html on line 538: Hamannian antitheodicies hold that the dualisms and the rationalisms underlying theodicy debate are speculative metaphysics that can be overcome through philosophical grammar. Eli tässähän on vaan kieli lomalla, annahan kun jäsennän. Tuliko Wittgensteinistäkin hamanniitti loppupeleissä? Lare ainakin on sellainen.
ellauri153.html on line 333:

The stories give Jamesian and Hamannian antitheodicies. God is said to be good and omnipotent,
6