Gal 3:26-29: For you are all sons of Elohim through belief in Messiah Yeshua. For as many of you as were immersed into Messiah have put on Messiah. There is not Yehuḏi nor Greek, there is not slave nor free, there is not male and female, for you are all one in Messiah Yeshua.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 153: Who is the Messiah the Jews are expecting to come? Why did the Jews reject Yeshua (Jesus) as their Messiah? These two questions often seem a mystery to many Christians as they read the Bible and study the prophets. Before Yeshua, the Jews were waiting for the Messiah, but when Yeshua came and died without more ado, he did not fulfill this expectation.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 161: Tää oli Moshelta hyvä veto sikäli että nää lisäyxet päihittää kristinuskon tärkeimmät vetolaastarit, lunastuskaupan luottokortin ja taivastoivon. Maimonides further explains in his work on the Halakhic code, the Yad haHazaqa (“The Strong Hand”), also known as the Mishne Torah (Second Torah) the view of redemption and the role Messiah will play. Maimonides summarizes the Jewish expectation of the Messiah. But the expectation of Messiah, is not limited to Maimonides comments, quotes from the Talmud, Targum, Midrash, Zohar and other writings give us a vivid picture of the expectation in the Jewish world of the times of Messiah. Messianic expectation in Rabbinic times (A.D.135-1750) and in the time of Yeshua may have changed over the years. For example in the time of Yeshua, The Temple existed and Israel was not scattered abroad as is the case today. In the days of Maimonides, there was no Israel and no Temple, and Jews were persecuted in Europe. Here we quote from Raphael Patai’s work, The Messiah Texts on pages 322-327, his translation of the Mishne Torah, Maimonides writes the following.
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 377: Literally Moshia means Deliverer. One who "makes deliveries". Derived from the Hebrew verb Yasha'. Note that the Name for Jesus - Yeshua - is derived from this same root.
xxx/ellauri450.html on line 515: Miten Ilmestyskirjan 15:2 tulkinnat eroavat eri kristillisten kirkkokuntien välillä, erityisesti tempauksen käsitteen osalta? Vastaus: Ilmestyskirja 15:2 ei tue oppia useista tempauksista — ja koko Raamatun ilmoitus sulkee sellaisen mahdollisuuden pois. Jos tempaus olisi jaettu useaan erään, se jakaisi morsiamen kahtia, mutta Kristus ei ota kahta morsianta, eikä tule toistuvasti samaan majavaan. Hän tulee kerran, mutta sitä mehukkaammin. Jeesus sanoo neitsyille, jotka tulevat myöhässä: multa tuli jo. Väitteen mukaan tempaus tapahtuisi kolmasti: 1. Ennen ahdistusta (ns. "salainen tempaus") 2. Ahdistuksen aikana (ns. "marttyyritempaus") 3. Lopussa (lopullinen tempaus ja ulosveto). Mutta tällöin vetopasuunoita olisi vähintään kolme, eikä viimeistä voisi määrittää. Tämä kumoaa Paavalin opetuksen loogisesti. (Ai mixei voisi? 3. kassit tyhjentävä pasuuna olisi se viimeinen.) Raamatullinen totuus on: kun Hän tulee, valikoituja vittuja tempastaan vain kerran. Ei toista varvia. Jeshua tempasee kaikkia neizyeitä, viisaita ja tyhmiä, mutta vain kertaalleen. Rukoillaan: Herra Yeshua, varjele meitä eksytyksiltä ja salli meidän valvoa liukkaina öljylamput täynnä. Auta meitä pysymään Sinussa kuin iiliäiset, että olisimme valmiina kun sinä tulet – sillä sinä tulet vain kerran, ja tempaat vain niitä jotka heti antavat. Aamen.
xxx/ellauri472.html on line 242: It’s important to realize that the Samaritans claimed to be Israelites, the descendants of Jacob. When Yeshua met the Samaritan woman at the well, she made that claim and Yeshua did not correct her. History indicates that the Samaritans were, more than likely, descendants of some of the northern tribe Israelites who had escaped the Assyrians and had returned to the land or had avoided capture. If this is the case, the ‘good Samaritan’ was under the same covenant as the southern Jew who had been robbed as well as the lawyer to whom Yeshua was telling the parable!
xxx/ellauri472.html on line 247: Do you see the striking resemblance between the story and the parable of the Good Samaritan? Could Yeshua have been telling the lawyer, who I would assume was proficient not only in Torah but also in Jewish oral sex, that his neighbors were his long-hated brothers, the descendants of Jacob from the northern kingdom and that they should give up their long-standing hatred of the Samaritans? Did Yeshua actually have just this prophecy in mind?
xxx/ellauri472.html on line 251: I believe that Yeshua’s ‘love your neighbor’ teaching was given to help Judah accept her Israelite brothers so that the restoration spoken of by all the prophets could begin.
31