ellauri011.html on line 47: Which, though ´twere wild—as on the plundered wreck

ellauri011.html on line 1381: Which in my spirit dwelt is fluttering, faint, and low.
ellauri017.html on line 192: Which number is an prime number, a whole number, a natural number and an odd number?

ellauri017.html on line 200: If god is number one, am I then number two? Which one to look out for,

ellauri017.html on line 210: Which perfectly agrees with received theology.

ellauri035.html on line 494: Which I'll not hear at waking. Weep not at dawn,
ellauri035.html on line 505: Which I saw pass above the engraven hills.
ellauri039.html on line 515: Education, okay, well this one is a two bladed sword. I am studying finnish currently, and while they do suck at teaching their own language but they are teaching about proper nutrition! Which is pretty awesome if you ask me. It's great that they want to make sure even immigrants, like me, are healthy!
ellauri041.html on line 1968: Is Finland a country? Do they have cars in Finland? How is Germany for Indians? Varmaan parempi kuin jenkkilä, jossa ainoot hyvät intiaanit on kuolleita. Why are Swedes so successful? Which countries don't like Finland? Nää on jenkkiläisen Quora sivuston ozikoita.
ellauri042.html on line 146: stupefied horror! Which vasten kauhistuneina! Kuka
ellauri046.html on line 799: Which throbs with delight to the first kiss of love.
ellauri048.html on line 1380: Which once she foster'd up with care; Jota hiän kerran hoisi huolella;
ellauri048.html on line 1385: Which little cared for fades not yet. siltikään ei kuihdu vieläkään.
ellauri048.html on line 1468: Which heaves but with the heaving deep. Joka nousee ja laskee vaan meren mukana.
ellauri048.html on line 1502: Which weep a loss for ever new, Ne itkee samaa iänikuisesti uutta surua,
ellauri048.html on line 1507: Which weep the comrade of my choice, Joka itken mun valittua kamua,
ellauri048.html on line 1737: Which led by tracts that pleased us well,
ellauri049.html on line 94: Which but to-day by feeding is allay'd, kuin päivittäin uusiutuva ruokahalu,
ellauri049.html on line 101: Which parts the shore, where two contracted new Joka vetää ulapalle meren laineet.
ellauri051.html on line 780: 204 Which of the young men does she like the best? 204 Mistä nuorista miehistä hän pitää eniten?
ellauri061.html on line 578: Which let thy wiseness fear: hold off thy hand. Jota sun ois viisasta varoa: handut irti.
ellauri063.html on line 65: Rosa Lichtenstein? I am not quite sure who this person is and who publishes her work, but I can scarcely find anything on her besides her own resource page. Which leads me to believe the addition of her in this is nothing more than self-promotion by the author in particular themselves. This lowers the quality of this article to let any random Blogger have their criticisms added to this. Dialectical Materialism is a serioues philolosophical school and method attached to Marxism, and there is lot of commentary on the subject without resorting to unpublished internet articles.
ellauri067.html on line 560: "I thought I was sophisticating the Beat spirit with secondhand science", said Pynchon. Which stands as a pretty good description of some of his novels, too.
ellauri071.html on line 121: Another of Coward's wartime projects, as writer, star, composer and co-director (alongside David Lean), was the naval film drama In Which We Serve. The film was popular on both sides of the Atlantic, and he was awarded an honorary certificate of merit at the 1943 Academy Awards ceremony. Coward played a naval captain, basing the character on his friend Lord Louis Mountbatten.
ellauri094.html on line 758: And the stark evil of the atheist Communists becomes even more stark when considering the fact that Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were fighting for what most wars are fought for: Wealth and Empire. Which is A-OK. The Israeli did the same with the help of Jehovah. The atheist regimes slaughtered their own people simply to impose their will upon their less powerful compatriots. Which the Christians never do. Well, not nearly as many got killed anyway. I guess. Haven't really toted up all the Christian wars. The colonial ones too, and the U.S. neocolonial ones like Korea and Vietnam, or the Desert Storm. Should one use the absolute body count or percentages? Ethics is not an exact science after all. It's more like economics.
ellauri095.html on line 55: Hopkins did live such a life, but the windhover reminded him of Jesus’ great achievements after Nazareth. The windhover “stirred” his desire to become a great knight of faith, one of those who imitate not only the constraint but also the “achieve of, the mastery of” this great chevalier. The “ecstasy” of the windhover recalls Hopkins’s initial desire in “Il Mystico” to be lifted up on “Spirit’s wings” so “that I may drink that ecstasy/Which to pure souls alone may be.” Ultimately, Hopkins became aware that he had been hiding from the emotional risks of total commitment to becoming a “pure” soul. The phrase “hiding” thus suggests not only hiding from the world or from worldly ambition but also hiding from God.
ellauri097.html on line 579: (Sitä kiinnostaa internet ja älypuhelin – ja siksi avoimen koodin ohjelmistot ja ymmärrys tietokone-ohjelmien toimintatavoista olisivat tärkeämpiä demokratian edistäjiä kuin kirjapainot. Kirjapaino oli 1500-luvun internet. Tai internet on 2000-luvun kirjapaino. Whichever way.)
ellauri098.html on line 606: Which word best describes you?
ellauri099.html on line 164: In 314/3, Xenocrates died from hitting his head, after tripping over a bronze pot in his house. Which just goes to show.
ellauri100.html on line 1233: Which an earthquake shatters down,
ellauri118.html on line 338: Which, like a spirit, faces west, Joka hengen tavoin osoittaa länteen,
ellauri118.html on line 746: Which Love and soft Desire had bred, Jonka rakkaus ja pehmo halu synnytti,
ellauri118.html on line 764: Which both Disdain and Shame express ; Joka ilmensi sekä ivaa sekä häpeää;
ellauri119.html on line 156: In the season one episode "When the Bookworm Turns," the evil Bookworm's Gal Friday is named Lydia. Batman and Robin discover her tied up and left behind by the Bookworm. Robin's response when he sees her is to shout, "holy Cinderella!" Which, of course, has nothing to do with the situation at hand at all. Or perhaps Batman read Robin a different "Cinderella" than others. Suomalainen Tuhkimo oli miespuolinen. Varmaan Batman luki sitä pikku homopetterille.
ellauri131.html on line 863: I think that is because, over the past decade or so, people have become far more aware of the concept of privilege. Which roughly translates to: “no I don’t want to read about all the problems a middle-class straight, white women with a good job has, no thank you”. It feels whiny, flat, tone-deaf. Marianne Power chases self-help like the world is falling apart and her life is in tatters, but the main source of her problems?
ellauri131.html on line 1035: ja musta yö sen verkkaan sammuttaa, Which by and by black night doth take away,
ellauri140.html on line 155: Which cunningly was without morter laid, Jotka ovelasti oli kasattu ilman laastia
ellauri140.html on line 333: Which of all earthly things he most did crave; Sitähän se ensimmäisex halusi.
ellauri140.html on line 386: Which therein shrouded from the tempest dred, Jotka linnut siis myrskyltä näin suojassa
ellauri140.html on line 421: Which when by tract they hunted had throughout, Tie eeku paranee, kuin Kallaveden jäällä,
ellauri140.html on line 483: Which when the valiant Elfe° perceiv'd, he lept Sen kun uljas tonttu huomasi, se hyppäs
ellauri140.html on line 519: Which stunck so vildly, that it forst him slacke Joka hais niin pahalta, ezen piti hellittää
ellauri140.html on line 687: Which from a sacred fountaine welled forth alway. Joka pulppusi sen pyhätakin vuorista.
ellauri140.html on line 1009: Which when he saw, he burnt with gealous fire, Ja kunse sen näki se mustasukkaisena
ellauri146.html on line 816: Which ever as she could with haste dispatch,
ellauri147.html on line 313: She has appeared in movies like Obduction and Daily Mirror. (Which one?)
ellauri147.html on line 356: “I couldn’t handle the pain and confusion surrounding my dad’s divorce and I was having a hard time balancing being a teenager with pursuing two grown-up careers,” Phil’s daughter Lily said. (Which ones?) Funnily enough, this wouldn’t be the end of Collins and Cevey’s story together. Until then though, the musician had some issues to deal with…
ellauri151.html on line 190: Which has been translated as "O happy, happy husbandmen, did they but know the blessings they possess, for whom, far from the din of war, the kindly earth pours forth an easy sustenance."
ellauri156.html on line 303: The inference is often drawn that Bathsheba should not have been exposing herself as she did, and that it was her indiscretion which started this whole sequence of events. Some think her actions may have been deliberate (She knew David was there and could see. . . .), while others would be more gracious and assume it was simply poor judgment. Let me point out several things from the text. First and foremost, when Nathan pronounces divine judgment upon David for his sin, Bathsheba and Uriah are depicted as the victims, not the villains. When Adam and Eve sinned, God specifically indicted Adam, Eve, and the serpent, and each received their just curse. This is simply not the case with Bathsheba. Nowhere in the Bible is she indicted for this sin. It may be that the author did not choose to focus upon Bathsheba, but even in this case, the Law would clearly require us to consider her innocent until proven guilty. (Which law? Not biblical law for sure, take for instance Susan's case, where Daniel had to called upon to prove her innocence.)
ellauri180.html on line 394: Which done, she rose, and from her form Mun tultua se nousi ja veti päältä
ellauri180.html on line 534: Which answer'd not with a caress—he died. Joka ei vastannut rapsutuxella,
ellauri180.html on line 544: Which was a mockery; then they lifted up Sytyttäen pienen liekin, ihan läpällä,
ellauri181.html on line 378: If the same traits were evaluated on an ipsative measure, respondents would be forced to choose between the two, i.e. a respondent would see the item "Which of these do you agree with more strongly? a) I like parties. b) I keep my work space neat and tidy."
ellauri182.html on line 231: Muita polttavimpia kysymyxiä: Can you feel the love tonight? Can you geet pregnant on your period? Can one get pregnant from precum? Can dogs eat cucumber? Why is my poop green? Why should we hire you? Why are cats afraid of precumber? Why did I get married? How to tie a tie? How to lose weight? How to get away with murder? Where is my refund? Where is my mind? Which Disney princess are you? Which side is your appendix on? Who wants to be a millionaire? Who won the powerball?
ellauri197.html on line 317: Whichever is the correct explanation, the word choice makes the reference to “November” more sensible since it is the month that is on the brink of winter. In this, “November” is an indication that she is very close to being submerged into “the cold” of her sorrow over the memory, and that sorrow can cause her happiness and liveliness to “perish” just as winter can steal the livelihood of plants and nature.
ellauri197.html on line 475: Which eye hath never seen, Jota kukaan ei ole nähnyt,
ellauri198.html on line 203: Which I shall suffer and act again,
ellauri198.html on line 458: Which underneath looked kneaded up with blood. Mudasta, josta saattoi haistaa veren.
ellauri198.html on line 520: Which, while I forded, - good saints, how I feared Kun kaalasin sen yli, kyllä pelkäsin,
ellauri205.html on line 96: Tuulessa heiluvia puita on hiljattain ollut ainaskin siinä japsujen Äidit leffassa plus siinä Frantz nimisessä pätkässä missä joku sakemannin suursodassa ampunut ranskis tuli pyytämään sen omaisilta niskalaukausta anteexi. Which in turn was based on Maurice Rostand's 1930 French play L'homme que j'ai tué..
ellauri206.html on line 211: Riku ei pysty aikuistumaan edes kirveellä. Siitä on noloa olla eno, se on kuin pukeutuisi porokuvioiseen neuletakkiin. When the Prophet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam (may Allah exalt his mention) was asked: “Which sin is the greatest?” He sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam (may Allah exalt his mention) said: “To set up rivals for Allah, your Creator.” It is said: ‘Thereafter?’ He sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam (may Allah exalt his mention) answered: “To kill your children for fear of eating with you (i.e. fear of want). It is said: ‘Then, which is next?’ The Prophet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam (may Allah exalt his mention) said: “To have sex with your neighbor's wife.”
ellauri210.html on line 837: “M. Gide,” Cravan began, “I have taken leave to call on you, though I feel myself duty bound to inform you straight off that I far prefer, for example, boxing to literature.” “Literature, however, is the only terrain on which we may profitably encounter one another,” he replied rather dryly. Cravan thought: “He certainly lives life to the full.” We spoke about literature therefore, and he asked me the following question which must be particularly dear to him: “Which of my works have you read?" "Which of my matches have you seen?"
ellauri219.html on line 809: The soft power means that they aren’t necessarily going to hate you outright: Americans did not bomb Britain out of an Empire, they just took over their dominions, whatever they got up to in Vietnam or Iraq. But people know that you’re the obese gorilla, even if you constantly tell them that you are virtuous and noble. Which will make them all the more ready to pounce on you, when you inevitably fall short of your virtuous and noble rhetoric. That virtuous and noble rhetoric made the resentment inevitable.
ellauri219.html on line 815: You’re hearing it even now, in the tedious whataboutism from the Global South (the new enemy, now that Global North is practically ours) about Ukraine. People expect Putin’s Russia to elbow neighbours aside in pursuit of security. That’s what imperial Athens did to Melos. They don’t expect any better. But America? America said it was better. So what? Who in their right mind would believe them? They are a nation of used car salesmen. It still does, with its advocacy of human rights. That’s why the non-stop whataboutist refrain from them is that America is hypocritical. Which it is, to a fault.
ellauri222.html on line 327: Grandma Lausch tells Augie, “The more you love people the more they’ll mix you up. A child loves, a person respects. Respect is better than love.” Which is really better, respect or love? The two brothers, Augie and Simon, are on opposite sides of this argument. Augie identifies himself on the side of love. An idealist with a soft heart, he is almost comically susceptible to falling in love, and openly shows his sympathy, even toward the small lizards that are killed by the eagle Caligula. Augie’s vision for an orphan home and academy is driven by his motivation to share love. Simon, on the other hand, prefers respect. He marries Charlotte and stays with her because he admires her business sense, not because he feels romantic love for her. He doesn’t care whether the men at the club love him. In fact, he knows they hate him. But this doesn’t matter to him as long as he is respected. Ultimately, Simon is richer and more successful, but Augie seems happier. What's love got to do with it. What a reptile.
ellauri241.html on line 1428: Which he kept as fixedly as Simpsons' Marge,

ellauri247.html on line 367: Which frightened both the heroes so,

ellauri247.html on line 460: Which to your whole sex does belong; Joka kuuluu koko sukupuolelle;
ellauri249.html on line 135: ("Whichever girl receives the blows of my swelling 'tail',

ellauri269.html on line 290: The Alliance and the Horde each have different backgrounds and stories, and are divided along racial lines. Which faction you choose will dictate where you play, who you play with, and what Races you can play. This may sound all too realistic, but that is how the cookie crumbles!
ellauri269.html on line 307:
ellauri269.html on line 379: "He's going to the Undercity," said Arthas. The ancient royal crypts, dungeons, sewers, public toilets and twining alleys deep below the palace had somehow gotten that nickname, as if the place was simply another part of town. Which it was! Dark, dank, filthy, the Undercity was intended for prisoners or the dead, but the poorest of the poor in the land somehow always seemed to find their way in. If one was homeless or a university professor, it was better than freezing in the elements, and if one needed something illegal, even Arthas knew that that was where one went to get it. Now and then the guards would go down and make a sweep of the place as a pro forma gesture to clean it out. (This imagery courtesy of New York Subway Authority.)
ellauri277.html on line 83: Which of you would be a reed, dumb and silent, when all else sings together in unison?
ellauri282.html on line 412: Mertonista tuli innokas uskontojen välisen ymmärryksen kannattaja, joka tutki itämaisia ​​uskontoja tutkimalla mystistä käytäntöä. Hänet tunnetaan erityisesti vuoropuhelun uranuurtamisesta aasialaishenkisten henkilöiden, mukaan lukien Dalai Laman, kanssa; japanilainen kirjailija D. T. Suzuki ; Thaimaan buddhalainen munkki Buddhadasa ja varsinkin vietnamilainen munkki Which What Hanhi. Merton kirjoitti elokuussa 1966 esseen Jubileelle nimeltä "Nhất Hạnh on mun velivainaja", jossa hän sanoi: "Minulla on paljon enemmän yhteistä Nhất Hạnhin kanssa kuin minulla on monien amerikkalaisten kanssa, enkä epäröi sanoa sitä, siitä huolimatta että hän on juuri niitä vinkuintiaaneja jotka julmasti nirhasivat meikäläisten koptereista pudonneita urhoja Viet Kongin pusikoissa."
ellauri301.html on line 98: He first appeared when Sweden was in the middle of a precipitate retreat to laissez-faire capitalism from the optimistic social democracy of the 1960s and 70s, so that the corruption and decay of the hero found an echo in the corruption and decay of the society around him. Sweden had become a much more racist country than it had seemed in the 60s, when there were hardly any immigrants from outside Scandinavia there. All the racist hate had been spent on the Finns, who nobody could distinguish from the locals until they opened their mouths. Which they rarely did.
ellauri311.html on line 671: bond? Which celebrity ruined their career because of a publicity stunt?
ellauri313.html on line 625: Which heaven to gaudy day denies. jonka taivas kieltää päivän räikeydeltä.
ellauri313.html on line 629: Which waves in every raven tress, Jota jokainen korpinmusta haven varjostaa,
ellauri318.html on line 69: Which is why you are always needed! This special talent of coping with all hurdles makes you indispensable.
ellauri326.html on line 438: Olga Skabeyeva said on state-owned Rossiya 1 TV: "It can safely be called World War Three. That's entirely for sure. [...] We're definitely fighting against NATO infrastructure, if not NATO itself. We need to recognise that." She has further claimed that NATO is supplying Ukraine with "zillions of weapons". (Which is entirely true, see the list.)
ellauri353.html on line 305: Shut up Rose, I thought I would use my few remaining 50 minutes here. You forward publishing people would ask me what's it going to be like. And I said well it's a book which is starting out as a love story. And which will end up as a treatise on social and that's largely what happened though it's throughout from beginning to end it really is a love story because Rose and I have really lived a love story we first met. Just exist. Just sixty sixty six years ago. In September. Nineteen thirty two. And from that time to this we have been close. And I trust shall continue to be said though she gives me no guarantees for the future. To talk about one area of social policy. Which we have engaged for many years. And recently made a major move. And that area is schooling elementary and - this is the main thing! educational vouchers. Parental choice of schools. Not to put a too fine point to it, better folks should have freedom to put their kids in better schools. Hooray democracy, fuck equality, like Alexis Tocqueville said, etc. etc. ad nauseam.
ellauri362.html on line 216: Jotka sun hyveet ja rinnat mussa nostatti; Which thy beauty and virtue had rais’d in my breast;
ellauri369.html on line 356: Which_%22Sartor_Resartus%22_Was_Written.jpg/600px-Room_in_Which_%22Sartor_Resartus%22_Was_Written.jpg" />
ellauri377.html on line 302: "Works of the flesh" means works in which the prompting of the erectile flesh is recognizable. The phrase is equivalent to "the deeds or doings of the body," which we are called to "mortify, put to death, by the Spirit" (Romans 8:13). In Romans 13:12 and Ephesians 5:13 they are styled "works of darkness," that is, works belonging properly to a state in which the moral sense has not been quickened by the Spirit, or in which the light of Christ's presence has not shone. Which are these (ἅτινά ἐτι); of which sort are. Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness (πορνεία [Receptus, μοιχεία πορνεία], ἀκαθαρσία ἀσέλγεια). This is the first group, consisting of offences against chastity - sins against which the Church has to contend in all ages and in all countries; but which idolatry, especially such idolatry as that of Cybele in Galatia, has generally much fostered, viz. fornication and other joys of the flesh.
ellauri384.html on line 62:
ellauri390.html on line 419: Which What Hanhesta on jo pitkä paasaus albumissa 282, joten hän ei esittelyä tarvize. Riittää siis nyt keskittyä kavereiden sanomaan, tai sanomiin jos ne ovat erilaisia. No ainakin Jack näyttäisi olevan ulkoilmaihmisiä, Hanhi sitävastoin viihtyy sisäilmassa. Pidän enemmän tunkkaisesta.
xxx/ellauri027.html on line 442: Which champignons of knowledge, expansion, innovation or industrialization still merit recognition? (Vastaus: Eskin Muutostehdas Oy.)

xxx/ellauri059.html on line 416: Which he calls ‘interest.’ Cursèd be my tribe
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 378: Which of those things, did not come from a wealthy person? Everything did. The food you ate to day, came from a wealthy person’s store, transported by a wealthy person’s truck, and likely produced by a wealthy person’s farm, on a wealthy person’s contract.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 457: Because it assumes that rich people automatically create more jobs if they have more money. This idea ignores the reason why jobs are created in the first place: to make profit. Which means that new jobs are only created if they are profitable to the employer. If all the jobs that could be created aren’t, it doesn’t matter how much money the employer has. And therefore giving the employer more money in such a situation will not lead to more jobs being created.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 489: are really enviable and which ones just a little. We’re wholly certain many readers will be astonished by our conclusions. Which is to say, we fully
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 240: Fine. But I still would like to reserve the right as a novelist to use only the characters that pertain to my story. Which is NOT going to be about some funny lesbians and fat blacks, as long as I have a say on this. And I do, I do! For I am a straight white middle-class American, and thank God they still have the say!
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 272: But in my events to promote Big Brother, like trying to peddle it to my acquaintances, I started to notice a pattern. Most of the people buying the book in the signing queue were thin. Well the whole queue was pretty thin. Especially in the US, fat is now one of those issues where you either have to be one of us, or you’re the enemy. It's like Christianity: who is not for Jesus is against him. We don't know if he was fat, but most likely he was scrawny, he could not even carry his cross. I verified this when I had a long email correspondence with a “Healthy at Any Size” activist, who was incensed by the novel, which she hadn’t even read. Which she refused to read. No amount of explaining that the novel was on her side, that it was a book that was terribly pained by the way heavy people are treated and how unfairly they are judged, could overcome the scrawny author’s photo on the flap.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 281: I reviewed a novel recently that I had regretfully to give a thumbs-down, though it was terribly well intended; its heart was in the right place. But in relating the Chinese immigrant experience in America, the author put forward characters that were mostly Chinese. That is, that’s sort of all they were: Chinese. Which isn’t enough. They ought to be specifically American Chinese immigrants, believers in the American Dream. That would have fattened them out.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 292: Which brings us to my final point. (Believe me, I am slowly really getting to wind up!) You do not all do it equally well as I. So it’s more than possible that we write from the perspective of a one-legged lesbian from Afghanistan and fall flat on our arses. We don’t get the dialogue right, and for insertions of expressions in Pashto we depend on Google Translate. I know, I had to do it for my Irish boy.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 504: 13. Nathan interprets Coleman’s choosing to reject his past and create a new identity for himself as “the drama that underlies America’s story, the high drama that is upping and leaving—and the energy and cruelty that rapturous drive demands,” whereas Walter thinks of his brother as a “calculating liar,” a “heartless son,” and a “traitor to his race” [p. 342]. Which of these views seems closer to the truth? Are they both legitimate? What is Ernestine’s position?
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 477: Which ‘Spirited Away’ Character’ Are You By Your Zodiac Sign: Libra to Pisces
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 479: Which ‘Spirited Away’ Character’ Are You By Your Zodiac Sign: Aries to Virgo
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 501: Which ‘Lord Of The Rings’ Character You Are, Based On Your Zodiac Sign
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 502: Which ‘Lord Of The Rings’ Character You Are, Based On Your Zodiac Sign: Libra to Pisces
xxx/ellauri134.html on line 512: Which ‘Lord Of The Rings’ Character You Are, Based On Your Zodiac Sign: Libra to PiscesJune 8, 2020In "Entertainment"
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 178: Does it sound interesting if a protagonist is meant to have little to no relevance in the plot? How can a protagonist not have any relevance to the plot? Whichever character you do give relevance to becomes the protagonist.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 765: Which ties me to the second point 2) The love interest. Who's a Caucasian Man (I will now abbreviate this as CM in all my future reviews with a WOC protagonist, I think) who overrides Rei's spoken opinion at so, so often that...okay Rei, if someone just tried to murder you in your room and you asked the hotel for a new room, DON'T LET THAT CM THAT YOU'VE KNOWN FOR LESS THAN TWO DAYS OVERRIDE YOUR OPINION AND FORCE YOU TO STAY OVERNIGHT WITH HIM! The fact that she ends up going along with HIS opinion nearly all the time 2a) DOES NOT EXCUSE HIS BEHAVIOR and 2b) is grating like nails on chalkboard.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 222: (4) Ippolit tries to figure out the point of living for two weeks. On the one hand, why not just die now and get it over with? But on the other hand, he feels like it's actually only now that he has a death sentence of sorts that he has really started to live. (Which, okay, guys, remember the story Myshkin told about the condensed man and how full of life his last few hours must be? There is definitely more to the idea that the person who knows he is about to die lives a very full life at the end—as Dostoevsky himself experience at his staged execution.)
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 487: “Which none but secret sisterhood may see, jota kazoa ei saa salaakaan kukaan muu
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 546: Which was, to lead him, in close secrecy, Eliskä se ohjaa Porfyyrin ihan salaa
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 649: Which when he heard, that minute did he bless, Kun Madeline käänsi kylkeä, oli hetki
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 246: 23 "Thus he said: 'The fourth beast shall be A fourth kingdom on earth, Which shall be different from all other kingdoms, And shall devour the whole earth, Trample it and break it in pieces. 24 The ten horns are ten kings Who shall arise from this kingdom. And another shall rise after them; He shall be different from the first ones, And shall subdue three kings. 25 He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, Shall persecute the saints of the Most High, And shall intend to change times and law. Then the saints shall be given into his hand For a time and times and half a time. 26 'But the court shall be seated, And they shall take away his dominion, To consume and destroy it forever. Daniel 7: 23-26
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 254: 13 I was watching in the night visions, And behold, One like the Son of Man, Coming with the clouds of heaven! He came to the Ancient of Days, And they brought Him near before Him. 14 Then to Him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, That all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, Which shall not pass away, And His kingdom the one Which shall not be destroyed. Daniel 7:14-14
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 481: Lisbon, Portugal. Dia mundia da filosofia by the Externato João XXIII .“In this atypical year, in which our lives are so busy and so full, we mark this day with simplicity. But meeting what is necessary and so primordial in the world of Philosophy: Shop to Think. Thus, without artifice, we leave to the community of the Externato João XXIII, the challenge of shopping to think and seek a question for an answer, this is a philosophical exercise par excellence. It intends to stimulate our critical and creative thinking. The story is told of a wise man who knew the right answer to any question from and about the Universe. It was 42. However, he did not know the question it was an answer to. Which question would you suggest?
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 491: Bamberg, Germany. Unesco-Welltag der Philosophie by Bamberg Universität. Man is only fully human where he plays (Friedrich Schiller). Play is still a largely unexamined phenomenon in ethics education. Despite the numerous possibilities of using it (e.g. as a role play), the traditional text discussion is still the standard. In interaction, the participants and the lecturer will discuss and test different possibilities of a game-centered ethics education. The central question is: Which competencies can be opened up through the use of playful methods? To make sure that it does not just remain theoretical, we offer all participating students a city tour of a different kind: By means of a rally on the app Action-Bound, the participants get to know Bamberg not only with its well-known sights, but also from a philosophical point of view. In addition to answering questions about the content, there are also smaller but philosphically no less important tasks to complete.
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 208: Which we are toiling all our lives to find, Joita me äherrämme ikämme ezimässä,
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 246: Which, be they what they may Jotka mitä lienevätkään,
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 254: Which neither listlessness, nor mad endeavour, Mitä ei vetelyys eikä hullu yritys
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 261: Which brought us hither, Joka toi meitin tännepäin,
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 281: Which having been must ever be; Siihen mikä oli ja on vastakin,
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 637: Which one is true? We simply do not know for sure. The facts about his death have not been historically proven, beyond a reasonable doubt. In fact, there is no historical consensus on the person of Matthew. There are several conflicting accounts, and the Greek text does not state anywhere he was an eyewitness (and therefore a disciple). Maybe he was a fake. The problem is the gospel of Matthew is anonymous: the author is not named within the oldest surviving text, and the superscription "according to Matthew" was added some time in the second century, although the gospel doesn't state it's an eyewitness account. The historically very likely incorrect tradition that the author was the disciple Matthew begins with the early Christian bishop Papias of Hierapolis.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 764: 467 convicted murderers in 18 prisons (urban and rural) in all 9 provinces of our country, located by the South African Department of Correctional Services (DCS), completed a questionnaire, approved by this department. 392 men and 75 women were interviewed before completing their questionnaires. The latter consisted of questions regarding general information such as age, race group, gender, and length of sentence. The first question focussed on: (1.a.1) What was your motive for committing murder (jealousy, spite, anger, thoughtlessness, money, or anything else - that had to be indicated)? (1.a.2) Were you exposed to violence shortly before committing murder (electronic media, or any other type of violence – that had to be indicated)? (1.b) Which of the following contributing factors played a role in the commitment of the murder (drugs, alcohol, or both)? (1.c) Was the murder premeditated or committed impulsively? The second question focussed on: (2.a) Do you think capital punishment would be a deterrent to committing serious crimes? (2.b) And in your specific case: Do you think capital punishment would have been a deterrent to committing murder? Question three (3) asked: Was the victim known to you? By name, sight, or not at all? Question four was interested in: (4.a) Are you currently involved in a rehabilitation program. And (4.b): If you are currently involved in a rehabilitation program, do you think this program is helpful, and if yes, in which ways? The last question (5) focussed on: Will you murder again? In gaol or after you have been released?
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 220: Tip: Which parts did you find compelling?

xxx/ellauri199.html on line 238: High school can be everything you want it to be or your worst nightmare. For me — it’s okay other than the fact that just about everything I’m surrounded by goes completely against my beliefs as a Christian. Whether it be walking in the hallway hearing terribly vulgar words, common gossiping, or young kids praising the loss of their virginity. You also have your popular “in” music that blatantly puts pre-marital sex, illegal drugs, and the love of money on a pedestal. These are just some of the worldly things we have to deal with on a daily basis that can oh-so easily sweep somebody in. At this point, the options must be weighed: choose God or choose the world? Which god to choose? Which one has the biggest dick?
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 247: Which I haven't got already?
xxx/ellauri218.html on line 351: By the traditional definition of Judaism, everyone who has a Jewish mother is automatically Jewish. Which is all fine and well.But should the traditional definition apply in the case of Bobby Fischer? Once a brilliant chess champion, a transcendent genius, he descended into lunacy, claiming the Holocaust never happened, vindicating September 11 attacks, and denouncing his Jewish roots, even writing to the Encyclopedia Judaica asking for his name to be taken out.
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 120: The title of the film alludes to Ray Bradbury's 1953 novel Fahrenheit 451, a dim view of the future United States, drawing an analogy between burning books and the reception of the September 11 attacks; one of the film's taglines was "The Temperature at Which Freedom Fries Burn".
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 133: Despite grossing just $6.7 million worldwide, one of the lowest totals of Moore's career, Fahrenheit 11/9 received generally positive reviews from crickets. Which helped to get Trump elected as President. Enough is enough, Mike, close your trap!
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 284: Gender and sexuality are prominent themes in a number of Le Guin´s works. The Left Hand of Darkness, published in 1969, was among the first books in the genre now known as feminist science fiction, and is the most famous examination of androgyny in science fiction. The story is set on the fictional planet of Gethen, whose inhabitants are ambisexual humans with no fixed gender identity, who adopt female or male sexual characteristics for brief periods of their sexual cycle. Which sex they adopt can depend on context and relationships.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 300: Each volume of Anals of the Western Shore also describes the coming of age of its protagonists, and features explorations of being enslaved to one´s own power. The process of growing up is depicted as seeing beyond narrow choices the protagonists are presented with by society. In Gifts, Orrec and Gry realize that the powers their people possess can be used in two ways: for control and dominion, or for healing and nurturing. Which will it be? This recognition allows them to take a third choice, viz. make like a tree and leave. This wrestling with choice has been compared to the choices the characters are forced to make in Le Guin´s short story "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas". Similarly, Ged helps Tenar in The Tombs of Atuan to value herself and to find choices that she did not see, leading her to leave the Tombs with him. But remember, Le Guin never left Portland where her wimpy husband could barely hold a teaching job.
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 101: 21. The Knowledg of the First Attesters is ascertain’d by what has been prov’d. §. §. 15.16. Their Veracity must be prov’d by shewing there could be no Apparent Good to move their Wills to deceive us; and the best proof (omitting the Impossibility of joyning in such an Universal Conspiracy to deceive, the Certain loss of their Credit to tell a Lie against Notorious Matters of Fact &c.) is the seen Impossibility of Compassing their Immediate End, which was to Deceive. Which reason is grounded on this, that no one man, who is not perfectly Frantick, acts for an End that he plainly sees Impossible to be compassed. For example, to fly to the Moon (LOL), or to swim over Thames upon a Pig of Lead. (Except a really Big Hollow Pig of Lead.)
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 106: Note, That some of these Matters of Fact now mention’d, do fall short as to some of the best Qualifications found in diverse other Traditions; viz. as to that of their being Practical. Which gives us farther light to discern the Incomparable Strength of Tradition, and how every way Impossible it is it should deceive us, were it furnisht with all the Advantages it might have.
xxx/ellauri234.html on line 522: The Russkies have a brand new missile they call Sarmat (for us Satan-2) that can carry no less than 10 nuclear warheads all the way to us. Which our outdated Patriots cannot stop. So there is hope for us who are down and out as yet.
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 154: Which was the moon, and thine eyes fill the world Joka oli kuu, ja sun silmät täyttää maailman
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 355: Which deed of these twain were not good to praise? Kumpi näistä tekosista ei ollut kiitettävä?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2324: Which all their lives fare after their own kind
xxx/ellauri255.html on line 120: Antony Pyp Pipo: However, what’s interesting is how few of the White officers in Petrograd, Moscow and many other places actually joined the revolt against the communists at that stage. I think they were all so dispirited and demoralised by everything that had happened that most of them had sunk into apathy. But yes, there were certain areas where there were very strong reactions against the Bolsheviks. And that early part of the civil war, in the winter of 1917–18, showed that the outcome largely depended on what happened in local areas. It was a geographically fragmented civil war that was taking place across the whole of the landmass. Which really shows it was an oppressed people's uprising.
xxx/ellauri261.html on line 317: COT. Which I know is not misplaced. (BOLT and MIZZLE bow.)—On no account leave the premises.

xxx/ellauri261.html on line 620: Altizer combined Kierkegaard and Mircea Eliade to concoct a mystical rather than ethical language for solving the problem of the death of God, or, as he puts it, in mapping out the way from the profane to the sacred. Which makes a rather rough reading, admits William Hughes Hamilton III (March 9, 1924 – February 28, 2012) who was a prominent theologian and proponent of the Death of God movement.
xxx/ellauri268.html on line 250: "Exactly," said Dumbledore, beaming once more. "Which makes you very different from Tom Riddle. It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." Are you pro-life or pro-choice? It's your life, if that's your choice.
xxx/ellauri307.html on line 730: Earth and the animals in seven days. Which is right?' Unfortunately, the response
xxx/ellauri314.html on line 49: Alla intresserade är välkomna, du behöver inte ha tidigare erfarenhet av mindfulness eller meditation. Vi börjar med en stunds meditation eller annan form utav närvaroövning, som efterföljs av en frågestund och ett föredrag av den läraren som håller passet (se teman nedan). Sedan tar vi en paus med te/vatten, och avslutar med en stunds meditationsövning igen med alla dom som ännu är närvarande. Du kan komma i vanliga, bekväma kläder. Mindfulnessista on paasattu mm. albumeissa 74, 88, 132, 219 (Patanjali), 282 (Which What Hanhi), 114, 116, 122 (Maisu), 123, 126, 137, 200, 225, ja tämä vielä.
xxx/ellauri314.html on line 239: Which psykososiaalinen vaikutus pidät eniten? Cheerleader vaikutus epäilemättä. On olemassa kiehtova ilmiö, jossa houkuttelevan ryhmän läsnäolo vahvistaa jokaisen yksilön havaittavaa houkuttelevuutta. Havainnollistava esimerkki tästä käsitteestä voidaan poimia sen nimikkeistöstä: Cheerleader-vaikutus. Tämä vaikutus olettaa, että jokaisen cheerleading-ryhmän jäsenen viehätys on kohonnut, kun he ovat kollektiivisesti läsnä, mikä antaa heille lisääntyneen kauneuden ja kauneuden tunteen.
139