Ah! What should follow slips from my reflection...
ellauri004.html on line 490: EX-LEPER: Ah, yeah. I could do that, sir. Yeah. Yeah, I could do that, I suppose. What I was thinking was, I was going to ask him if he could make me a bit lame in one leg during the middle of the week. You know, something beggable, but not leprosy, which is a pain in the arse, to be blunt. Excuse my French, sir, but, uh--
ellauri004.html on line 842: Whatsapp,
ellauri005.html on line 265: What's good, and doth no good:
ellauri008.html on line 749: Man is amazing, but not a masterpiece, he said, keeping his eyes fixed on the glass case. Perhaps the artist was a little mad. Eh? What do you think? Sometimes it seems to me that man is come where he is not wanted, where there is no place for him; for if not, why should he want all the place? Why should he run about here and there making great noise about himself, talking about stars, disturbing the blades of grass? ...
ellauri009.html on line 666: What is a conviction? A particular view of our personal advantage either practical or emotional. (Conrad 164)
ellauri011.html on line 918: Meanwhile, she thought to herself: Hmmm, the others must have noticed that I feel different. What a wonderful thing it was, to be able to love. It's what makes us remember our mission on earth, our purpose in life. [A full page follows of this sort of dithyramb. Another solo aria starring Paulo.]
ellauri016.html on line 988: What makes a government translator tick?
ellauri017.html on line 178: What made you believe in God? Tell me your experience.
ellauri017.html on line 191: What is a whole number and a natural number?
ellauri017.html on line 193: What is god's phone number?
ellauri017.html on line 589: What is the origin of god, if he is one? Is it zero? No it cannot be, for nothing can come out of nothing!
ellauri018.html on line 814: Motsäger jag mig själv? Gott, jag motsäger mig. Jag rymmer mångfalder. Sanoo Allah ja hymyilee monimielisesti kuin Wilt Whatman, jota siteeras Thoreau isin mielikirjassa Skogsliv vid Walden. Elastista juridiikkaa, mielivalta sisäänrakennettuna. Not a bug but a feature. Tää on yksi tieteellisen ja uskonnollisen maailmankuvan peruseroja. Hieman iso, mutta kyllä tästä selvitään, sanoo Allah ja taikoo ristiriidan piiloon. Tai poistaa valittajan pään.
ellauri020.html on line 247: Katrinka laughed, and like every other man, Franta [yx sybikaalisesti urhea rallikuski, Kimi Räikkösen näköinen pikkumies lippis väärinpäin] found the sound of it completely captivating. The looks of her big boobs perfectly erectile too, most likely. Didnt even register that she was 8 months pregnant. What a fairy tale.
ellauri020.html on line 584: TVstä tutut nimet putoilevat kuin sadepisarat. What a wonderful feeling, singing like Scrooge in a rain of gold. Nyt on leninginvaihtopäivät, ystävän myyntiä, naiset arvuuttelevat kuka on kenenkin housuissa. Onko tuo Haloselta? Vaiko Ajattaresta? Ei sunkaan sulla oo Marin mekko? Gudrun Sjödenin teltta vai ison tytön kokoko Lollosta? Miten Pukeva! Likinäköisemmät tihrustavat rinnoista logoja ja niskasta hintalappuja. Sokru on kexinyt tatuoida koko hinnastonsa iholle. 22 vaihtoehtoa polaroid-kuvilla.
ellauri022.html on line 499: ➢ What happened to_________in this story?
ellauri022.html on line 501: ➢ What do you suppose_________was thinking inside his/her head?
ellauri022.html on line 502: ➢ What would you say to________? ➢ What would you have suggested that_________do?
ellauri022.html on line 504: ➢ What plan did_________come up with?
ellauri022.html on line 505: ➢ What do you think will happen next time_________has a problem?
ellauri022.html on line 606: Todistaako se jotain että Siri aina tappaa nää pikku Maxit, Paul doppelgängerit. Ingan uus heila Henry on sen miesvainaan elämäkerturi. Inga kysyy Ekeltä minkälainen nainen makaa rakkaan miesvainajansa elämäkerturin kaa. Kai Sirin tapanen. Siri antaa taas ymmärtää et se on oikeestaan Paulin haamukirjottaja. Kexii sille juonet ainakin. Helppo uskoa. Paul on sen verran tollon olonen. Innostuu pesäpallosta. Leo Herzberg, ei siis Lars (joka ei saanu Helsingistä virkaa mun ansiosta ja styylas Mereten kaa), on kameo Sirin bestselleristä What I loved, jota en oo lukenut. Hypistelee Ingaa vaatteet päällä keppi kädessä.
ellauri025.html on line 386: Tylyn mutta fragiilin oloinen kaunis Esther Sanditonissa ei huoli Napoleonixi sonnustautunutta loordia koska luulee rakastavansa veljeään Edwardia. Lady Denham vimmastuu ja ärähtää kuin Tina Turner: Love!? What's love got to do with it? Avioliitossa ei ole kyse rakkaudesta, se on bisnistä, diili jossa sovitaan meemien ja reviirien siirrosta. Hesiodos on tismalleen samaa mieltä. Tismalleen!!! se huutaisi pikku jurrissa juotuaan ize käyttämäänsä kotiviiniä, kuin Obelix ja Aladobix Asterixissa. Kunhan ei saisi maxavaivoja. Maalaistollo.
ellauri025.html on line 643: Lovecraft is a famous writer and bullshit artist, but also a well-known racist. Should I read his novels?Was H.P. Lovecraft ever a chill or a good guy at least even a little bit? I know his works basically put humankind to the lowest of the low, but was there even a tiny bit of good in him?What does H.P. Lovecraft mean with his phrase “That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even death may die” in his writing of The Nameless City?
ellauri025.html on line 652: How high is your IQ Howard? What do you think is the best underwear for men's health? Stud briefs have a second fly behind for farts. Oscar Wilde and Roger Casement would have had other use for it.
ellauri026.html on line 272: Tää on vähän eri selitys altruismille kuin tiimi-izekkyys, siis että peilisolut (izekkäät geenit) saa yxilön samastumaan tiimiin niin kovasti etse unohtaa oman etunsa. Tässä pointtina on et ihan izekkäistä nautinnoista mehukkain on tiimin läpytys, eli ylpeys on kuskin paikalla. Whatever, sama se.
ellauri028.html on line 99: Toinen aivan mainio kahden markan pläjäys on What is man. Kyse on taas just samoista teemoista kuin mullakin, onx ihminen vaan tyhmä elukka vai vielä pahempaa, vaan kone, vaiko jotain hienoa, joku taskukokoinen puolijumala. Nuori mies uhoilee, vanha mies suhtautuu kyynisesti, ei enää edes sarkastisesti. (Joku kyllä kommentoi, fair enough, että näissä filosofisissa dialogeissa on aina joku fixu, esim. vanha mies, ja toinen totaalinen tomppeli, esim. nuori mies. Epistä, Joni heittää KOKO AJAN! valitti Pauli lumisodassa Juuan mökillä.) Erittäinkin hyvin väännettyjä pointteja. Mm. se LM Alcottin runotytön skizo et jos hyvis saa hyvät vibat kiltteydestä onx se sillon izekäs vai epä. Turhaa nikerrystä ja nakerrusta, mitä väliä. Hyvin menee mutta menköön. Who cares, kuten argumentoi Booze Hound alempana.
ellauri028.html on line 175:
What is Man?
ellauri028.html on line 194: What Is Man?
ellauri028.html on line 197: Apparently man is a selfish prick that can't think for himself and relies on "outside influences". He is a chameleon. He is nothing but a mere machine. Well, at least according to Twain. Man is a fraud and only lives for himself. He is really driving home this point that everyone is selfish and acts out of selfish needs (big surprise?), even if viewed (publicly and personally) as a self-sacrificing person. My question is; who cares? If the end result is the same, what does the actions matter. Let's say, saving a woman from a burning house. Twain says you do this out of making yourself feel good and avoiding the pain of not saving the woman, nothing else; the woman comes second to your own need of feeling good. But regardless of how it makes you feel, you still saved the woman in the end. The good is still done, even though you did it for yourself. Forget how the action was achieved. What does it matter if we refer to this as "self sacrificing" or "selfishness". Answer me this question, Twain! THE ACTION REMAINS THE SAME!!!.... I feel this must have been written during a time when everyone was going around smugly proclaiming to be self-sacrificing do-gooders and self-proclaimed religious nuts while really being shitty people; which had to be the most annoying thing ever. I guess it feels a bit outdated and I think people who naively go around claiming that they are "self-sacrificing do-gooders" are simply laughed at in our post modern times as smug assholes who need to get off their high horse (high horse? who owns a fucking horse nowadays, anyways?). I feel it is pretty accepted now that those who do good are doing them for their own selfish gains and the view of acceptance by others, at least I think this is the case. I don't know cause I don't know do-gooders, everyone I know (including myself) are dicks and more concerned with their celluar phones and creating social dating websites on the internet in vain attempts to pick up chicks only to drink alone and desperately spend several hours harassing women on social dating sites until one, out of pity, decides to respond to your 50 private messages, which then they foolishly decides to set up a date with you; only for you to be disappointed and stood up; which results in more drinking and paying a "dancer" to give you a hand job behind the goodwill on a Saturday night....
ellauri028.html on line 199: Anyways, I feel "What is Man?" is really a precursor to Freud (also Dostoevsky and Nietzche are precursors) and the Ego, which is pretty impressive for the time, but again, it feels a bit dated. He is also repetitive about the same idea of man being selfish, which is annoying like this review...
ellauri028.html on line 203: Jesus, I am sorry for this whole rant. This is a book review, not a therapy session...I guess I am having a bad day ...Sorry...This is all pathetic, this is all a very sad, sad self centered review...I have lost all my steam, as if I had much to begin with. Where did it all go wrong? When did it start? What has happened to me?
ellauri029.html on line 114: What we learn from the books, we put straight into practice, in example in the dialogues during training sessions or while working in the projects.
ellauri029.html on line 413: What else is new? Tätähän se on ollut aina, ja Mandeville 1700-luvulla
ellauri029.html on line 461: Anterokeskeinen ajattelu on izekeskeisen ajattelun rasistinen versio. Elukat jotka on samanlaisia "kuin me", mutta erivärisiä tai pitää erilaista ääntä, kuten neekerit, juutalaiset, saxalaiset ja muut apinat, on ihan erilaisia ja ennen kaikkea pahempia "kuin me". Ne ei ajattele, tunne, käyttäydy hyvin eikä ansaize samaa kohtelua "kuin me". Elukat jotka on ihat erilaisia kuin me, kuten sitten kaikki muut elukat, eivät edes tunne samoja tunteita eikä tarpeita "kuin me", ne ei siis ansaize mitään muuta kuin tulla syödyxi tai tapetuxi muuten vaan. Mitkä vitun "me"? Valkoinen vääpeli underground sarjakuvassa huusi neekerikersantille Vietnamin sodassa: "We must kill the yellow commies, before they kill us!". "What do you mean we?" kysyi kersantti. Tähän kuuluu myös se et ezii jotain anterouden perimmäistä olemusta tai selitystä, mix me ollaan niin eteviä ja hienoja. Ei me olla. Sillä hyvä. Me ollaan pikku paskiaisia pienenä, ja isona kusipäitä pyllynreikiä. Siitä ei pääse edes kysymällä "ketkä me?". Vastaus on selvä: Sinä, minä ja Hentun Liisa, Puntun Paavo ja Juorkunan Jussi, Kapakka-Lassi ja Myllårin Matti, plus yli 9 miljardia muuta. Täytyy lukea Mark Twainin Matkakirjeitä maasta (1909).
ellauri029.html on line 906:
Question: "What does the Bible say about satire and/or sarcasm?"
ellauri033.html on line 1076: According to legend, Tasso wrote verses to his beloved Eleonora that touched her heart. A few years later, at the wedding of one of the Gonzaga family, celebrated at the court of Este, Tasso kissed the princess Eleonora on the cheek. Furious, Alphonso turned coolly to his courtiers and remarked, "What a great pity that the finest genius of the age has become suddenly mad!" The duke had Tasso shut up in the hospital of St. Anna in Ferrara. (In actuality, Tasso had been beset by delusional fears of persecution starting in 1575 and began a series of mad wanderings around 1577.)
ellauri039.html on line 782: Heis veis, kääntyy Jackyn What ho! Eila Pennasen Howards Endin käännöxessä. Alemman keskiluokan puhekieltä. Kalle Ankassa sanoi Långben hej svejs. Heisulivei ja heippa sun heiluvilles sanoi Hessu Aku Ankka-piirretyssä. Mikki, Aku ja kumpp. järsii maissintähkiä vuorta alas syöxyvässä matkailuvaunussa kuin kirjoituskoneet, kilahtaen kun kela tulee rivin loppuun. CR-LF. Hyvä lopun aikojen embleemi.
ellauri040.html on line 346: Z-sukupolvi ei edes naura niille, kazoo vaan huuli pyöreenä. What seems to be the problem, officer? Kirjasta on tullut videon kässäri, jota kuunnellaan autossa äänikirjana kuvan puutteessa. Kuha autot alkaa ajaa ize, ei senkään vertaa tarvita.
ellauri042.html on line 212: What’s missing from this chart is just as important
ellauri042.html on line 695: Fedor M. Dostoevsky´s family had old-Lithuanian aristocratic origins. The name was derived from the Russian word dostoijny, which means dignified. What a misnomer. Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky was born on October 30th, 1821 (old Julian calendar; on November 11th, 1821 according to the Gregorian calculation) in Moscow, as the second son of Mikhail Andreevich Dostoevsky, a doctor at the hospital for the poor.
ellauri042.html on line 815: What had Sacks left to Weschler? What did his gift, his command, amount to beyond the dying wish of a magnificent and, by some accounts, paradoxically self-effacing and narcissistic doctor to have yet another book, beyond the 13 he himself had written (three more would come posthumously), to help ensure his immortality? Maybe this:
ellauri045.html on line 804: Justice is one primary virtue, of course, the balance and respect in society so characteristic of Switzerland-well, I suppose not always, and not for every single immigrant, and until 1971 not for every single woman voter; but usually. Temperance is another, the balance in a soul, controlling desire. Courage is the third. What person could flourish if like Oblomov he stayed in bed out of uncontrolled fear, or out of ennui, an aristocratic version of cowardice? Prudence is the executive virtue, as St. Thomas Aquinas called it-know-how, savoir faire, self-interest. It rounds out the four virtues most admired in the tough little cities or tougher big empires of the classical Mediterranean. The Romans called the four of justice, temperance, courage, and prudence the "cardinal" virtues, on which a society of warriors or orators or courtiers hinged (cardo, hinge). The Christians called them, not entirely in contempt, "pagan."
ellauri046.html on line 805: What are visions like these to the first kiss of love.
ellauri046.html on line 912: What is King Ringang's daughter's name?
ellauri046.html on line 914: What does she do all day long,
ellauri048.html on line 935: What you are, root and all, and all in all, mitä oot, juurineen, kaikkineen,
ellauri048.html on line 1078: Given that no one has ever doubted that Tennyson had some sort of "disembodied, spiritualized passion" for Hallam, this conclusion comes as rather a painful anticlimax. Admittedly, Alf named his son Hallam after Hallam, the one who went to Australia. Of course, the fact that members of Tennyson´s family succumbed to madness, alcoholism, and drug addiction already has made some readers aware that, like so many other Victorians, he should be taken down from a pedestal and join the rest of us. But think of the stir if one the greatest poems of the nineteenth century, one which has major influence on poets as different as Whitman and Eliot, turned out to be chiefly a gay lover's lament! (What's wrong with that? There are zillions of others, better yet.) Tän apologian kirjoitti on George P. Landow, Professor of English and the History of Art, (fittingly) from Brown University.
ellauri048.html on line 1129: This stanza is to be found in Canto 27. The last two lines are usually taken as offering a meditation on the dissolution of a romantic relationship. However, the lines originally referred to the death of the poet's beloved friend. They are reminiscent of a line from William Congreve's popular 1700 play, The Way of the World: "'tis better to be left than never to have been loved." What the fuck, this is an obvious homoerotic elegy.
ellauri048.html on line 1175: What seem'd my worth since I began; Mikä näytti mun nettoarvolta kun mä aloitin;
ellauri048.html on line 1235: What whispers from thy lying lip? Mitä kuiskit sun valeläpästä?
ellauri048.html on line 1261: 'What is it makes me beat so low?' 'Mikä saa mun pulssin näinkin hitaaxi?'
ellauri048.html on line 1575: What words are these have falle'n from me? Mitä nää sanat on jotka musta putosi?
ellauri048.html on line 1833: Whatever fickle tongues may say.
ellauri049.html on line 361: What are some reasons not to move to Belgium? The Belgians themselves are the most important reason. They are selfish, arrogant, noisy, rude, full of hate, machismo and gynephobia, fundamentalistically religious, uncivilized, vulgar, ugly, mostly drunk and intoxicated with coke and xtc, very dangerous car drivers, cannibals and neanderthalers. (by: Charles Baudelaire)
ellauri049.html on line 547: Päinvastoin he ovat vituttavia koska he ovat olevinaan suuria ranskalaisia runoilijoita. Jos homorunoilijoita kaivataan, olisihan meillä omasta takaa toi lähes kokonaan unohtunut Wolt Whatman ja sen frankofoni negrier poikaystävä. Freedom fries. Ranskis neekerit on jenkkisarjoissa melkein aina homoja , se on viidakon vanha klishee. Mustia tähtiä jonkun toisen tähden varjossa, esim Gilfordin tytöissä ja Emma Pariisissa.
ellauri051.html on line 394: What charm thy music works!--thou makest pass before me, Sun musa on charmanttia! -- sä paat mun eteen kulkemaan
ellauri051.html on line 474:
ellauri051.html on line 476: 1800-luvun imperialistiromantikoista monet olivat vanhemmiten partapozoja, se näyttää olleen muotina. Ja lähes kaikki julkkiskirjailijat ja runoiljat maailman sivu on olleet aivan vitunmoisia narsisteja. Narsistin passi näyttää olevan julkkissanasepon pääsylippu. Mainiota. Näissä kaikissa on ihan identtistä Amerikan henkeä: Wilt Whatman, Saul Bellow, Henderson the Rain God, ja Donald Trump. Ne on ilkeitä Taavetteja jotka haluis olla Koljatteja, nolata naisia ja neekereitä sillä tavalla. Maailman vahvin mies kisat alkoi USA:ssa, nyt voittajat on pohjoiseurooppalaisia, Burkina Fason Biby on kova haastaja. Pullistelu on yhteistä jenkeille ja härkäsammakoille, jotka Henderson räjäytti kuoliaaxi padon mukana. Aina pitää olla huomion keskipisteenä, näyttämässä muille mistä kana kusee. Mamma, mamma, titta på mej!
ellauri051.html on line 478: Walter ”Wilt” Whatman (31. toukokuuta 1819 Long Island, New York, Yhdysvallat – 26. maaliskuuta 1892 Camden, New Jersey, Yhdysvallat) oli yhdysvaltalainen runoilija, esseisti, journalisti ja humanisti. Hänen tunnetuin teoksensa on runokokoelma Pössyä (alkuteos Leaves of Grass). Ei se ollut mikään länkkäri, vaan city slicker, dick licker.
ellauri051.html on line 480: Wilt Whatman syntyi West Hillsissä Long Islandilla kahdeksanlapsisen perheen toisena lapsena. Perhe muutti Brooklyniin Waltin ollessa kolmevuotias. Walt lopetti koulunkäynnin 11-vuotiaana ja ryhtyi isänsä avuksi elättämään perhettä. Aluksi hän työskenteli asianajajatoimiston juoksupoikana ja sen jälkeen kirjapainoissa. Työläistaustainen Whatman tuki demari Martin Van Burenia tämän presidentinvaalikampanjassa 1836.
ellauri051.html on line 484: Whatman ryhtyi opettajaksi 17-vuotiaana ja opetti viiden vuoden ajan Long Islandilla, vaikka ei pitänytkään opettajan työstä. Opetustyönsä ohessa Whatman kokeili vuonna 1838 toimittaa viikkojulkaisua nimeltä Long Islander, mutta se ei ilmestynyt pitkään. Hän siirtyi tyhjäntoimittajan uralle vuonna 1841. Whatman alkoi kirjoittaa vakituisesti artikkeleita newyorkilaiseen Democratic Review -lehteen, ja vuosina 1842–1843 hänen artikkeleitaan julkaistiin myös muissa lehdissä. Whatmanilta julkaistiin hänen ensimmäinen kirjansa Franklin Evans, The Inebriate (Ameriikan Turmiolan Tommi), jossa hän kävi julkijuopottelua vastaan. Kirjasta tuli suosittu, ja se teki Whatmanin tunnetuksi, vaikka Whatman itse ei myöhemmin siitä ollutkaan ylpeä. Jatkoi salajuopottelua.
ellauri051.html on line 486: Vuosina 1846–1848 Whatman työskenteli Brooklyn Daily Eaglen toimittajana. Hän oli teräväkynäinen kirjoittaja ja toi omat radikaalitkin mielipiteensä herkästi julki, mikä johti hänen uransa aikana monesti lentopotkuihin.
ellauri051.html on line 488: Whatman muutti New Yorkista New Orleansiin vuonna 1848 ja työskenteli Crescent-lehden toimituksessa kolmen kuukauden ajan. New Orleansissa Whatman sai ensi kertaa harjoittaa kullin orjuutta. Palattuaan Brooklyniin samana vuonna hän perusti päivälehden nimeltä Brooklyn Freeman. Lehdessään Whatman otti voimakkaasti kantaa orjuutta vastaan ja Jeaninen puolesta. Eikö yhtään inkkarien puolesta, vaikka oli töissä intiaanitoimistossa? Inkkarit oli peräänantamattomampia kuin kuukerin Nellit.
ellauri051.html on line 490: Whatman kirjoitti työnsä lomassa runoja. Hän julkaisi 12 runon kokoelman Ruohoa (Leaves of Grass) vuonna 1855 ja painoi siitä 795 kopiota. Teos oli irtiotto senaikaisen runouden jäykistä normeista ja perinteistä. Runot syntyivät osittain Whatmanin rajaseuduille suuntautuneiden matkojensa sekä runoilija Ralph Waldo Emersonin ihailun inspiroimina. Whatman muokkasi ja laajensi runoteostaan vuosien varrella useasti ja julkaisi siitä yhteensä kahdeksan painosta. Kokoelma ei herättänyt aluksi paljon huomiota, mutta Ralph Waldo Emerson ylisti sitä. Seuraavana vuonna Whatman laajensi kokoelman 32 runon mittaiseksi. Julkaisuyhtiö kuitenkin kaatui sisällissodan alettua muiden kaatuneiden etunenässä. Walt jatkoi puuhailua veteraanien perässä.
ellauri051.html on line 492: Whatman muutti sisällissodan aikana Washingtoniinin hänen veljensä haavoituttua ja sai kaupungista töitä sisäministeriön intiaaniasioiden toimistossa. Vapaa-aikanaan hän kävi sairaalassa hoitamassa haavoittuneita sotilaita, mikä antoi aiheita hänen kokoelmaansa Drum-Taps (1865). Samana vuonna hän julkaisi sille trendikkäästi jatko-osan Sequel. Sodan jälkeen Whatman jatkoi veteraanien vierailujaan. Hän tapasi nuoren sotilaan nimeltä Peter Doyle, jonka kanssa hän aloitti suhteen.
ellauri051.html on line 494: Whatman julkaisi vuonna 1870 kokoelmat Democratic Vistas ja Passage to India sekä jälleen uuden version Leaves of Grassista.
ellauri051.html on line 496: Whatman sai ketnureaktion 1873 ja muutti Camdeniin New Jerseyyn veljensä luokse. Vuosina 1875–1876 hän julkaisi sisällissodasta kertovan kirjan Memoranda during the War, mutta halvaukset olivat jo hidastaneet hänen kirjoittamistaan. Whatman julkaisi myös uusia versioita Leaves of Grassista, jonka myyntituloilla hän osti Camdenista itselleen oman talon. Teoksen viimeinen versio sisälsi kaikkiaan 300 runoa. Whatmanin viimeiseksi jäänyt teos Good-Bye, My Fanny julkaistiin vuonna 1891.
ellauri051.html on line 498: Whatman kuoli Camdenissa 26. maaliskuuta 1892 sairastettuaan tuberkuloosia. Hänen arvostuksensa oli hänen viimeisinä vuosinaan kasvanut suureksi niin Yhdysvalloissa kuin muuallakin maailmassa. Hänen hautajaisiinsa tuli yli tuhat surijaa, kuten Wilho Pylkkäselle.
ellauri051.html on line 500: Whatmania pidetään yhtenä Yhdysvaltain merkittävimmistä 1800-luvun runoilijoista. Whatmanin runoudella katsotaan himoisuutensa johdosta olleen suuri vaikutus Yhdysvaltain 1900-luvun runouteen, mm nobelisti Zimmermanin lyriikoihin.
ellauri051.html on line 502: Bob Dylan channels Wilt Whatman in another glorious surprise release.
ellauri051.html on line 505: The world woke up this Friday to another pleasant surprise from, shall we say it again, the breezy Nobel laureate: a Whatman-esque tune aptly-titled “I Contain Multitudes.” Mitä helvettiä, toi onkin Whatmanin omakehusta, vaikka luin sen poikasena Callen Waldenista på svenska: "Motsäger jag mig? Gott, jag motsäger mig. Jag är stor, jag rymmer mångfalder."
ellauri051.html on line 508: Whatman ei saanut elinaikanaan paljonkaan hyvää palautetta eikä julkista tunnustusta runoistaan etenkään Yhdysvalloissa, vaikkakin häntä arvostettiin Euroopassa. Nuivuuden syynä olivat esimerkiksi hänen avoin kuvauksensa seksistä, hänen imagonsa hiomattomana työläisenä, sekä hänen tyylilliset innovaationsa. Whatmanin epätavanomaiseen tyyliin vaikutti raamatullisen runouden muoto. Siellähän sitä on aviotonta sexiä ja hiomattomia puuseppiä. Äijäily ja all-male paneelit on korkeassa kurssissa. Homoilua ei Paavali kyllä peukuta, Moosexesta puhumattakaan.
ellauri051.html on line 510: Useille lukijoille Wilt Whatman ja Emily Dickinson ovat 1800-luvun amerikkalaisen runouden peruspilareita. Täh? Julkihomo ja salalesbo ämmä? Ei meille repupersuille! Eritoten Whatmanin runous ilmentää perusamerikkalaisuutta. Runoilija tuo esiin tavallisen Amerikan hyvin perinteisellä jenkkityylillä (tätä on mm. vapaa tyyli). Hänen runoutensa voima tuottaa voimakkaita ja eläviä tunteita, ja hänet tunnistaa ilmaisun epä-älyllisyydestä. Whatman turvautuu toistoon luodakseen tekstinsä hypnoottisen tunnelman, tämä toisto luo samalla myös hänen runoutensa voiman, sillä se inspiroi lukijaa enemmän kuin informoi. Yleensä hänen runojaan pitää kuunnella äänikirjoina, jotta niiden sanoma avautuisi. Hänen runojensa taso tulee osittain niiden ylevästä diskurssista ja uskonnollisesta ja kvasiuskonnollisesta kielestä, kuten runoilija James Weldon Johnsonillakin (who dat?). Eli perusamerikkalaista on siis hypnoottisuus, epäinformatiivisuus ja feikkiuskonnollisuus. Check.
ellauri051.html on line 512: Sekä 1800-luvun että nykyisten amerikkalaisten runoilijoiden on ollut mahdotonta sivuuttaa Wilt Whatmania, sillä hän tavallaan loi perustan demokraattisen Amerikan runokielelle. Ei kyllä republikaanisen hittovie! Me ei noita häntä- ja kärsähommia!
ellauri051.html on line 514: Eräitä keskeisiä tekijöitä Whatmanin elämässä ja runoudessa olivat homoseksuaalisuus ja homoerotiikka, jotka liittivät hänen ihailunsa 1800-luvun ideaalisesta miestenvälisestä kaveruudesta avoimeksi kuvaukseksi maskuliinisesta kehosta ja jopa masturbaatiosta, kuten käy ilmi hänen ”Song of Myself” -runostaan. Se oli ristiriidassa sen närkästymisen kanssa, jota Whatman osoitti kohdattuaan vastaavia tekstejä jolloin hän ylisti siveyttä ja paheksui masturbaatiota. 2-naamainen luikero. Amerikan Tom of Finland.
ellauri051.html on line 516: Hän antoi ymmärtää, että hänellä oli vakava rakkaussuhde New Orleansissa asuvaan naiseen ja että hänellä olisi siellä kaikkiaan kuusi aviotonta lasta. Historioitsijat ovat todenneet, ettei väite naissuhteesta pidä paikkaansa. Tutkija Jean Luc Montaigne tarkentaa, että Whatmanin silloisen rakastajan nimi oli Jean Granouille, ei suinkaan Jeanine Granouille. Tämä nuorukainen, joka oli hugenottisaarnaajan ja orjan lapsi, oli vasta 26-vuotias, kun hän tutustui Whatmaniin. Jotkut halusivat puhdistaa Whatmanin maineen muuntamalla Jeanin Jeanineksi. Afrikkalaista alkuperää olevan rakastajattaren pitäminen oli huomattavasti hyväksytympää kuin mustan miesrakastajan pitäminen. Nykyisin pidetään selvänä, että juuri se runo heijastaa Whatmanin todellista suhdetta omaan seksuaalisuuteensa, mutta hän yritti peittää kiinnostustaan homokulttuuriin. Runossa ”Once I Pass’d Through A Populous City” hän muuttaa rakastettunsa sukupuolen naiseksi ennen runon julkaisemista. Ei ollut ainoa, ks. myös Marcel Proustin "tytöt". Antoivat ymmärtää ja ymmärsivät antaa.
ellauri051.html on line 518: Yhdysvaltojen sisällissodan aikana rintamalla Virginiassa (kuningatar Viktorian mukaan nimetyssä osavaltiossa) missä Whatman kävi etsimässä veljeään, vallitsi tiivis toveruus, ahkeraa pyssynrassausta, joka vaikutti hänen ajatuksiinsa homoseksuaalisuuden ja demokratian yhdistämisestä. Runossaan ”Democratic Vistas” hän ensimmäisen kerran erotti toisistaan heteroseksuaalisen (amative) ja homoseksuaalisen (adessive) rakkauden perustaen päätelmänsä pseudotieteeseen eli frenologiaan. Hän näki adessiivisen rakkauden eräänlaisena tukijatkona parhaimmalle demokratialle, munat eräänlaisena peräpainona, jota ilman amerikkalainen materialistinen ja vulgääri demokratia olisi epätäydellinen. Adessiivinen my foot. Eiköhän se liene ollut inessiivistä, illatiivista ja elatiivista, loppukahdennusta anusvaaralla.
ellauri051.html on line 520: When one looks closely at Wilt Whatman's poetry, one is struck, then, by its peculiar combination of extreme egotism that borders on solipsism, in which the entire cosmos and even aspects of divinity are subsumed into the poet's voice, and its affirmation of the poor, the humble, the suffering and the ordinary things of life. (Arthur Versluis: The Esoteric Origins of the American Renaissance)
ellauri051.html on line 528: Wanha Wilt Whatman poseeraa nakukuvissa ellauri051.html on line 533: Wilt Whatmanin laulu siitä izestään on pitempi kuin Elvixen muna jäykkänä. Pitkälti toista tuhatta riviä izekorostusta.
ellauri051.html on line 657: 99 A child said What is the grass? fetching it to me with full hands; Yx lapsi sanoi: mitä on ruoho? toi mulle sitä kaxin käsin;
ellauri051.html on line 684: 123 What do you think has become of the young and old men? Minne miehet kadonneet? Poveen maahan joutuneet. Voi milloin muistat sen!
ellauri051.html on line 728: 162 What groans of over-fed or half-starv'd who fall sunstruck or in fits, Ylensyöneiden ja nälkiintyneiden valituxet kun ne kaatuu auringonpistoon tai slaagiin,
ellauri051.html on line 729: 163 What exclamations of women taken suddenly who hurry home and give birth to babes, Naisten huudot jotka rientää kotiin synnyttämään vauvoja,
ellauri051.html on line 730: 164 What living and buried speech is always vibrating here, what howls restrain'd Mitkä elävältä haudatut puheet värähtelee täällä, mitkä ulvonnat joita hillizee
ellauri051.html on line 840: 259 What is commonest, cheapest, nearest, easiest, is Me, 259 Mikä on yleisin, halvin, lähin, helpoin, olen minä,
ellauri051.html on line 860: 278 What is removed drops horribly in a pail; 278 Se mikä poistetaan, putoaa hirveästi sankoon;
ellauri051.html on line 978: 391 What is a man anyhow? what am I? what are you? 391 Mikä on mies? Mikä minä olen? mikä sinä olet?
ellauri051.html on line 1053: 464 What blurt is this about virtue and about vice? 464 Mitä hämärää tämä on hyveestä ja paheesta?
ellauri051.html on line 1064: 475 What behaved well in the past or behaves well to-day is not such a wonder, 475 Se, mikä käyttäytyi hyvin ennen tai käyttäytyy hyvin tänään, ei ole ihme,
ellauri051.html on line 1088: 497 Wilt Whatman, a kosmos, of Manhattan the son, 497 Wilt Whatman, kosmos, Manhattanin poika,
ellauri051.html on line 1122: 531 Whatever goes to the tilth of me it shall be you! 531 Mikä tahansa, joka menee minun kallistukseeni, se olet sinä!
ellauri051.html on line 1249: 652 (What is less or more than a touch?) 652 (Mikä on vähemmän tai enemmän kuin kosketus?)
ellauri051.html on line 1311: 711 What I guess'd when I loaf'd on the grass, 711 Mitä arvelin, kun leipäsin nurmikolla,
ellauri051.html on line 1312: 712 What I guess'd while I lay alone in my bed, 712 Mitä arvelin, kun makasin yksin sängyssäni,
ellauri051.html on line 1655: 1047 What was strewn in the amplest strewing the square rod about me, and not filling the square rod then, 1047 Mitä ylenpalttisesti levitettiin levittäen neliömäistä sauvaa ympärilleni, eikä täyttänyt sitten neliömäistä sauvaa,
ellauri051.html on line 1685: 1076 Whatever interests the rest interests me, politics, wars, markets, newspapers, schools, 1076 Mikä tahansa kiinnostaa, muu kiinnostaa minua, politiikka, sodat, markkinat, sanomalehdet, koulut,
ellauri051.html on line 1690: 1081 What I do and say the same waits for them, 1081 Se, mitä teen ja sanon, odottaa heitä,
ellauri051.html on line 1746: 1135 What is known I strip away, 1135 Mitä tiedetään, minä riisun pois,
ellauri051.html on line 1758: 1147 (What have I to do with lamentation?) 1147 (Mitä tekemistä minulla on valituksen kanssa?)
ellauri052.html on line 60: Eugene Henderson is a troubled middle-aged man 1948. (synt. 1800-luvulla). Despite his riches, high social status, and physical prowess, he feels restless and unfulfilled, and harbors a spiritual void that manifests itself as an inner voice crying out "I want, I want, I want". Hoping to discover what the voice wants, Henderson goes to Africa. What a Yankee notion.
ellauri052.html on line 68: Scholars such as Bellow biographer James Atlas and others have shown that quite a few passages and ideas were lifted from a book titled The Cattle Complex in East Africa (1926) written by Bellow's anthropology professor Melville Herskovits who supervised his senior thesis at Northwestern University in 1937. What a schtekl, to steal from his own professor.
ellauri052.html on line 193: Salella on tuplahukki Chicagosta antropoloogiassa ja sosiologiassa. Se on grad school dropout Wisconsinista. Sen ns professuuri Chicagon Committee of Social Thoughtissa oli feikki, kyseessä on farmiliigan yliopiston aikanaan kekkaama julkkiskärpäspaperi. Oikeest se oli aina vähän nolo tosta keskilännen taustasta, kerskui sillä kuin Hyvinkään kultahattu. Se kerskuu Jenkkilän pahimmilla puolilla kuin Wilt Whatman.
ellauri052.html on line 702: They don't? They do me. What's the start?
ellauri052.html on line 719: `You did! What was he like then, as a wrestler?'
ellauri052.html on line 758: He came to consciousness again, hearing an immense knocking outside. What could be happening, what was it, the great hammer-stroke resounding through the house? He did not know. And then it came to him that it was his own heart beating. But that seemed impossible, the noise was outside. No, it was inside himself, it was his own heart. And the beating was painful, so strained, surcharged. He wondered if Gerald heard it. He did not know whether he were standing or lying or falling.
ellauri052.html on line 901: Nyt alkaa loppu olla käsillä. Humboldt lienee jälkeen yxi Salen alter egoista. Niinkuin myös George Swiebel joka käy Aahrikassa Hendersonina. Theo on kuin Wilt Whatmanin neekeripoikaystävä. Koko kirja on Salen painajainen ja märkä uni samaĺla. Nää on kaikki sen vaihtoehtoisia elämiä.
ellauri052.html on line 1006: Wilt Whatman, Waldo Emerson ja lättänenä Plato oli kaikki salen henkisiä kusipäitä sielunveljiä. 2 lisää: Dante ja Dostojevski. Kaikki Salen herot on narshishteja, misogyynejä ja vähintään piilohomoja. Niinkuin se. Ei se ihaile kuin kaltaisiaan mulkkuja. Sale ja sen isokannuinen Renata luuska on aivan hemmetinmoisia moukkia. Samaa luokkaa kuin Jasu ja sen kotka.
ellauri053.html on line 754: Tagoren miälestä runouden päämaalina on koruttomuuden ja pidättyväisyyden muodossa ilmenevä täyden täyteläisyyden kauneus. What the fuck.
ellauri053.html on line 843: Satyan porukat vastapäätä oli kääntäneet takkinsa vallanpitäjien kuosiin. The afternoons would start with tennis and tea and end with supper. What a galaxy of intellect and talent!
ellauri053.html on line 1003: What nice stories, mother, you can tell us! Why can't father write like that, I wonder?
ellauri053.html on line 1009: "What a naughty child!"
ellauri053.html on line 1011: What's the fun of always writing and writing?
ellauri053.html on line 1017: What do you think of father's spoiling sheets and sheets of paper with black marks all over both sides?
ellauri053.html on line 1080: What young poet
ellauri053.html on line 1316: Whatever is begotten, born, and dies. Mikä siitetään syntyy ja kuolee taas.
ellauri054.html on line 335: But you mustn't judge her by that. What I mean to say is,
ellauri055.html on line 74: Zweig oli kova Rolland fan. Eikaine vaan homostellu keskenään? Sitä oli paljon liikkeellä jetset piireissä. Bertie ja Conrad. Proust ja Bourget. Epäilyttäviä tapauxia pisteessä on läjittäin. Zweig nyt takuulla oli vähintään bi. Se ja sen vaimo teki seppukut brasseissa. What did Zweig have that brought him the fanatical devotion of millions of readers, the admiration of Hermann Hesse, the invitation to give the eulogy at the funeral of Sigmund Freud? Sas se. Freud teki suusyöpäisenä seppukun Lontoossa 1939. Ei ois kannattanut vetää tupakkaa. Henkilääkäri otti sen hengiltä morfiinipiikillä kuin vanhan koiran. Koiran iässä se oli 12-vuotias.
ellauri061.html on line 331: First Clown What, art a heathen? How dost thou understand the Spede 1 Mitä oozä pakana? Exä osaa raamattua? Hyvä kirja sanoo
ellauri061.html on line 337: First Clown What is he that builds stronger than either the Spede 1 Kekä se on joka rakentaa vahvempaa kuin kivimies, laivanrakentaja,
ellauri061.html on line 430: HAMLET What man dost thou dig it for? HAMLET Kelle miekkoselle sä kaivat sitä?
ellauri061.html on line 432: HAMLET What woman, then? HAMLET Mille naikkoselle sitten?
ellauri061.html on line 496: HORATIO What's that, my lord? HORATIO Mikä niin, hyvä herra?
ellauri061.html on line 527: LAERTES What ceremony else? LAERTES Mitä muita menoja vielä?
ellauri061.html on line 530: LAERTES What ceremony else? LAERTES Mitä muita menoja vielä?
ellauri061.html on line 550: HAMLET What, the fair Ophelia! HAMLET Mitäh! Onx toi sievä Ofelia!
ellauri061.html on line 566: HAMLET [Advancing.] What is he whose grief HAMLET [Etenee.] Mikä se on jonka suru
ellauri061.html on line 589: Make up my sum. What wilt thou do for her? voi ylittää mun saldoa. Mitä te teette sille?
ellauri061.html on line 609: What is the reason that you use me thus? Mixä kohtelet mua tällä lailla?
ellauri061.html on line 788:
ellauri062.html on line 286: Always the short end of the stick. Moira concludes by saying she's sinned a 8lot, but Serena is the gender traitor. Marry Freddy! What an infantile idea!
ellauri062.html on line 402: Haippiring ei ole muinisyläsaxan sana. Axl Smithin WhatsAppin ”Haippirinki” paljastui – karut viestit julki: ”Bongokausi korkattu”. Axl Smith levitti kuvaamaansa materiaalia WhatsApp-viestipalvelussa kuusi henkilöä käsittävässä ryhmässä. Kauppasi salaa nettikameralla otettuja nakukuvia. Ala-arvoista.
ellauri063.html on line 297: Pride & Prejudice earned a worldwide gross of approximately $121 million, which was considered a commercial success. Austen scholars have opined that Wright's work created a new hybrid genre by blending traditional traits of the heritage film with "youth-oriented filmmaking techniques". What "heritage film"? Austen's original screenplay?
ellauri064.html on line 512: Trillian: What are you supposed to do with a manically depressed robot?
ellauri064.html on line 513: Marvin: You think you’ve got problems. What are you supposed to do if you are a manically depressed robot?
ellauri064.html on line 521: “What’s up?” asked Ford.
ellauri066.html on line 447: What we left them, trains inherit, Irtaimemme perivät ne
ellauri067.html on line 339: Allen's health worsened further during his time on What´s My Line? and on March 17, 1956 while strolling down the streets of New York City, he suffered a heart attack and died at the age of 61. Fred Allenia löytyy valmiixinaurettuna sinäputkilosta. Sietämätöntä kaakatusta, puujalkapuisevaa. Fred ei koskaan päässyt televisioon. Tompan maalmansota meni radiota kuunnellessa. Tätä bullshittiä ei takuulla tullut BBC:stä 40-luvulla.
ellauri067.html on line 361: Enzian is the name of a foil character in Thomas Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow, contrasted against the main character Slothrop's association with the V-2. Onxtää V-2 niinkuin se kirja V paizi että reikänä on number 2? Enzian on notmii jota valkonaamat panee perseeseen. Mikä ihme siinä on että Tom of New Englandin näköiset piipunrassit niin usein kuumuu persehommista? Tulee vähän mieleen Wilt Whatman mielimutiaisineen.
ellauri067.html on line 384: What Does the Triskelion Symbol Mean? Derived from the Greek word "Triskeles" meaning "three legs", the Triskele or Triple Spiral is a complex ancient Celtic symbol. Often referred to by many as a Triskelion, its earliest creation dates back to the Neolithic era, as it can be seen at the entrance of Newgrange, Ireland. The Triskele gained popularity in its use within the Celtic culture from 500BC onwards. This archaic symbol is one of the most convoluted to decipher as symbolists believe it is reflective of many areas of culture from the time. Huoh. Vitun symbolistit. Seinän töhrijät. Nuijia. Kirkkovene ja Jallu luuraa on selkeämpiä.
ellauri069.html on line 44: What killed the distinction wasn’t defining pop art up. It was defining high art down. It was the recognition that serious art, too, is produced and consumed in a marketplace.
ellauri069.html on line 78: What was he doing? Daugherty is right to claim that Barthelme conceived of himself as an heir of the modernist tradition—in particular, of Beckett. He encountered Beckett’s work for the first time in 1956, when he picked up a copy of Theatre Arts at Guy’s Newsstand, in Houston, and read the text of “Waiting for Godot.” “It seemed that from the day he discovered ‘Godot,’ Don believed he could write the fiction he imagined,” the woman who was his wife at the time, Helen Moore Barthelme, says in her memoir, “Donald Barthelme: The Genesis of a Cool Sound” (2001).
ellauri069.html on line 101: Q: What do you consider the most important tool of the genius of today?
ellauri069.html on line 465:
Q: What is "Gravity's Rainbow" about?
ellauri069.html on line 475: Q: What makes "Gravity's Rainbow" a good book?
ellauri071.html on line 40: Kenosha Kid: Thomas Pynchon's novel Gravity's Rainbow possesses an image which has intrigued readers of the novel since its introduction. Many readers come away from the novel failing to find the answer to one question: What is the Kenosha Kid? Critics have argued about the identity of the Kenosha Kid. Some have argued that it does not really exist. Instead, it is only the result of Tyrone Slothrop´s hallucinations brought on by sodium amytal (or "truth serum"). Ironically, the idea that the Kenosha Kid comes out during a dose of "truth serum" proves to be even more confusing for readers (given it may or may not really exist). Other critics have denoted the Kenosha Kid as a dance (likening it to the "Charleston" or the "Big Apple" dances).
ellauri071.html on line 44: Tucker Carlson Justifies Kenosha Shootings: Vigilante Kid Did What ‘No One Else Would’ AND THERE IT IS “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” Carlson asked his viewers on Wednesday night. “Our leaders want us to believe this is a racial conflict, they’re always telling us it is. They’re lying. It is not a racial conflict,” Carlson grumbled, adding: “This is not a race war. This is a class war.” Updated Aug. 27, 2020 5:20AM ET / Published Aug. 26, 2020 9:11PM ET
ellauri071.html on line 468: Pynchon sanoo olevansa sexuaalisesti rakastunut omaansa ja lajin kuolemaan. On se outo hyypiö. Varhaiset amerikkalaiset kuten Wilt Whatman oli omalla tavallaan kiehtova yhdistelmä karkeaa runoilijaa, rujoa näkijää ja ilmihomoa. Wuxtry! huusi John Workman lehtipoikana Punainen Sulka-sarjan rags to riches poikakirjassa. Nykyisissä lehdissä ei ole etusivun uutisia, vaan kokosivun mainos. Tää sixkun ei ole enää lehtipoikia. Hoblassa toisella sivulla on myös mainos ja muutama värikoodattu klikkiozikko. Niitä ei voi ikävä kyllä klikata, tai voi mutta mitään ei tapahdu. On selattava asianomaiselle sivulle.
ellauri072.html on line 206: What has gone mainly unnoticed in the various discussions of the problem is something that has puzzled me for some time. Why does Dante treat the homosexual Florentines in Inf. 16 with greater respect than any other infernal figures except those in Limbo? I do not have an answer to that question, but would like to bring it forward. Let me begin with Purg. 26. We have probably not been surprised enough at Dante's insistence that roughly half of those who sinned in lust, repented, and were saved (and are now on their way to that salvation) were homosexual. It would have been easy for him to have left the homosexuals out of Purgatory, and it is hard to imagine an early (or a later) commentator who would have objected to the omission, especially since, in Hell, homosexuality is treated, not as a sin of the flesh, but as one of violence against nature. However, for a unique instance of a commentator who is aware of Dante's unusual gesture see Trifon Gabriele on Inf. 15.46: "Non e' dubbio che 'l Poeta vuol applaudere a questo vitio quanto egli puo'. Puopa hyvinkin. Ecco, gli fa parlare di belle cose e gli fa tutti grand'uomini nelle lettere e nell'arme e nella religione, e finalmente non e' peccato ne l'Inferno o Purgatorio che egli men danni con le parole sue che questo; anzi lo polisce quanto puo' con suoi versi".
ellauri072.html on line 216: As we see in Inferno 15-16, in Hell Dante damns sodomites as sinners of violence against nature. Nonetheless, even in his Hell, where Dante does not go so far as to include homosexuals as unrepentant lustful in the second circle, he still desexualizes his treatment of sodomy. What do we learn from all this? Yet the fact that here, as in Purg. 26, he chooses to put homosexuals in a good light when there was no apparent compelling reason for him to do so surely should cause us to ask further questions about Dante's views concerning homosexuality. Varmaan se oli homo izekin, Beatrice or no Beatrice. Sixkai sille riitti vaan ulista siitä Beatricesta. Satis enim dictum erat de tam obscena et tam spurca materia.
ellauri072.html on line 477: What will happen when the age-old economy of scarcity gives way to the Age of Leisure? Professor Gabor, who won the 1971 Nobel Prize for physics offers a futuristic projection based on a static population and GNP, "classless, democratic, and uniformly rich." Fearful that total secruity "will create unbearable boredom and bring out the worst in Irrational Man," Gabor is anxious to retain "effort," "hardship," and the Protestant Ethic -- lest society dissolve in an orgy of anti-social, hedonistic nihilism (viz. the current drug explosion and the spoiled-brat students). To avoid such evils Gabor proposes that work and its attendant moral uplift be divorced from production and the service sector of the economy be vastly enlarged. But this is only the beginning -- enthusiastic about Social Engineering Gabor suggests using it to weed out potential misfits, trouble-makers and "power addicts"; supplementing I.Q. tests with E.Q. (Ethical Quotient) measurements; and modeling elementary and secondary education on the 19th century British public school which knew so well how to inculcate good citizenship, intellectual excellence and pride in achievement. The Third World, still wrestling with pre-industrial material want, is ignored -- since we can't afford any more industrial pollution presumably they will just have to adjust to their misery. Gabor's assessment of "the Nature of Man" shows a woefully naive Anglo-American ethnocentricity and complete ignorance of anthropology and his vision of post-industrial utopia operating on the moral axioms of the 19th century is as elitist as it is improbable.
ellauri072.html on line 491: What with the recursive and self-reflexive and aw-shucks mixed with Kierkegaard and Stanley Cavell and higher mathematics, Wallace is infectious — weirdly, this is the case even if you have never read him! the voice has permeated the culture! Wow!
ellauri077.html on line 218: Galindo tells me that Wallace’s heavy sense of irony and self-deprecation fits in rather well with contemporary Brazil: “What... is much more HUMAN. It is not AMERICAN (though, I repeat, he may have thought it was).
ellauri077.html on line 271:
What Helps When We're Experiencing The Unthinkable
ellauri077.html on line 272:
What Helps When We're Stumbling in the Dark
ellauri077.html on line 275:
What About All These Mysterious Things That Have Been Happening Since the Death?
ellauri077.html on line 276:
What About This Thing Called 'Acceptance'?
ellauri077.html on line 437: What we believe to be the motives of our conduct are usually but the pretexts for
ellauri077.html on line 458: About Existentialist Engagement in Wallace, Eggers and Foer. The novels of David Foster Wallace, Dave Eggers and Jonathan Safran Foer are increasingly regarded as representing a new trend, an 'aesthetic sea change' in contemporary American fiction. 'Post-postmodernism' and 'New Sincerity' are just two of the labels that have been attached to this trend. But what do these labels mean? What characterizes and connects these novels?
ellauri077.html on line 604: Tis-mal-leen! Tässä Wallu oli aivan oikeassa. Mutta paskaa oli jauhettu jenkeissä jo ennen postmodernisteja. Yhtä eltaantuneita oli ne kolme jutkua (Belov, Malamud ja Roth). Yhtä paskiaisia oli tavallaan myös Wilt Whatman ja se Saroyan, armenialaismamu joka elvisteli puhtaaxi puleeratulla americanalla. Tai se village smithy jäbä, Hessu Långben. Ei hemmetti, ei jenkkilästä tule mitään hyvää vaikka voissa paistaisi. Ne on joko gooey tai ne on irvistelijötä. Ei ne saa naamaa peruslukemille millään.
ellauri078.html on line 125: What portion of me be mitä musta olikaan
ellauri078.html on line 153: The brevity of Emily’s stay at Mount Holyoke—a single year—has given rise to much speculation as to the nature of her departure. Whatever the reason, when it came Vinnie’s turn to attend a female seminary, she was sent to Ipswich.
ellauri079.html on line 107:
Whatever happened to the hillbillies in the end
ellauri079.html on line 303: Surprisingly, I use as an example of a free agent here a pingpong player. Presumably because my tennis-playing son has proved unsatisfactory. What I end up saying is distinguish agent causation from event causation. Futile squirming, it does not change anything.
ellauri080.html on line 302:
What Factors Influence the Big Five Traits?
ellauri080.html on line 361: Cloninger, C. R. (2013). What makes people healthy, happy, and fulfilled in the face of current world challenges? Mens Sana Monographs, 11, 16–24. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.109288
ellauri080.html on line 392: Michigan State University has distinguished nine different traits of temperament in kids. Dear parent if you don't understand your child read on. What the fuck! Americanism smells extremely strongly here!
ellauri080.html on line 566: Suicide attempts are accompanied by a willingness for death and can lead to suicide. They are more common in high-functioning autism and Asperger subjects. The methods used are often violent and potentially lethal or fatal. (What's the diff? Ah I get it: school killings and the like. Whether you chill yourself only or others besides.)
ellauri080.html on line 744: For his service in the Boer War, Gandhi was awarded the Queen’s South Africa Medal. What the fuck was he doing fighting a colonial war for the British? On the other hand, Boers were no better than Brits in that respect. They took turns on sitting on the natives, with the Indian middle class sitting in the middle.
ellauri082.html on line 112: What Happens at the End of Infinite Jest? (or, the Infinite Jest ending explained)
ellauri082.html on line 137: By the time of the match, his symptoms are so bad he’s taken by ambulance to the hospital (16: “the only other emergency room I have ever been in [was] almost exactly one year back”), safely escaping the A.F.R.’s assault. Like fellow student Otis P. Lord, he gets the bed next to Gately. Joelle (who is at the hospital for a meeting) visits Gately on her way out and recognizes Hal. She tells them both about the hunt for the lethal Entertainment and the resulting Continental Emergency and they all go to dig up JOI’s grave. They persuade John Wayne, a spy for the A.F.R., to become a double agent and help sneak them into JOI’s Quebec burial site. Wayne presumably tells the A.F.R. he is actually a triple agent — that he will steal the tape as soon as Hal digs it up. But, as with Marathe, his loyalties are ultimately even-numbered (n40). The A.F.R. finds out and brutally murders him, which is why he can’t win the WhataBurger (16f).
ellauri082.html on line 149: As seen in Chapter 1, Hal’s condition deepens until he literally can’t communicate at all, but no longer feels like a robot anymore. (12: “I’m not a machine. I feel and believe.”) The only thing he has left is tennis and he looks forward to playing Ortho Stice in the final match of the WhataBurger. But Stice is possessed by his father (in the manuscript, Stice is called “the Wraithster”), so the novel ends as Hal finally gets to really interface with his father — in the only way he has left.
ellauri082.html on line 277: What I myself have held. But why declare mitä pidän izelläni. Mut mixi selvittää
ellauri082.html on line 507: "A motion became a feeling!—no phrase that our lips can frame is so devoid of apprehensible meaning." (Says Spencer - check out this guy.) And some Tyndall guy that everyone knew by heart in late 19th: "the passage from the physics of the brain to the corresponding facts of consciousness is unthinkable." (Nothing to it except fear of death and retribution. Funny but seriously I have never seen anything the matter with it. Your mind is like a little video camera connected to a bunch of neural networks that mill the images around. Whats wrong with this concept is hard for me to see.)
ellauri083.html on line 98: LYDEN: What a relief. You must have been so eager to read your mother's words so many years after her death. What was that like?
ellauri083.html on line 114: LYDEN: I should think. Tell us a little bit about the story of this novel. What's it about?
ellauri083.html on line 378: “What astounds me,” said Ziering in an interview, is that for the past nearly three decades, people assume that this has been a matter of “he said, she said”—meaning Allen’s word versus Farrow’s. But after Ziering and codirector Kirby Dick began their research, they realized, “Actually, it’s been a ‘he said, he said’ situation. Mia didn’t even speak until the Vanity Fair interview [in 2013]. Never. She is such a private person. That’s really important to know. And she was sort of blindsided by all these events that happened to her. And kept trying to navigate the best that she could just to protect her children and family.”
ellauri083.html on line 415:
ellauri083.html on line 419: If humans evolved from apes as claimed by science books, why has it been that ever since then humans have not evolved to another thing more than human? What evolved the apes before the evolution to humans?
ellauri083.html on line 514: I will tell you why; so shall my anticipation prevent your discovery, and your secrecy to the King and Queen moult no feather. I have of late, but wherefore I know not, lost all my mirth, forgone all custom of exercises; and indeed, it goes so heavily with my disposition that this goodly frame the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory; this most excellent canopy the air, look you, this brave o’erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. What a piece of work is man! How noble in reason? How infinite in faculties, in form and moving, how express and admirable? In action how like an angel? In apprehension, how like a god? The beauty of the world, the paragon of animals. And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me; no, nor woman neither, though by your smiling you seem to say so.
ellauri083.html on line 527: What does “complicated joy” mean? I suppose we could say that Joelle gets a complicated form of pleasure from stringing Gately along. Although I’m not sure I believe that pleasure is necessarily equivalent to joy…there is a lot of complicated pleasure in the book, i.e. addictions to pleasurable substances, sex with underage partners, killing animals, etc. But are we truly supposed to believe that these characters are experiencing joy in their lives?
ellauri083.html on line 555: I said of laughter, It is mad: and of mirth, What doeth it?
ellauri089.html on line 116: There's no gap between will and action, for Heinlein's juveniles adulthood is devotion to something they want to do. This is the origin of the books' guilelessness—for that worldview is innocence, down at its root, even when the grand theme of a book is slavery, war, or survival in harsh circumstances. Being human isn't an insoluble problem for them. It's a puzzle that has a solution: be juvenile. What made Robert Heinlein inimitable was the easiness of the people in those stories.
ellauri089.html on line 367: These two questions may be expressed, the first in the form: What kind of things ought to exist for their own sakes? the second in the form: What kind of actions ought we to perform?
ellauri089.html on line 421: § 9. What is thus indefinable is not "the good", or the whole of that which always possesses the predicate "good", but this predicate itself. …
ellauri089.html on line 453: § 24. This and the two following chapters will consider certain proposed answers to the second of ethical questions: What is good in itself? These proposed answers are characterised by the facts (1) that they declare some one kind of thing to be alone good in itself; and (2) that they do so, because they suppose this one thing to define the meaning of "good". …
ellauri089.html on line 544: § 67. and by "metaphysical Ethics" I mean those systems which maintain or imply that the answer to the question "What is good?" logically depends upon the answer to the question "What is the nature of supersensible reality?" All such systems obviously involve the same fallacy—the "naturalistic fallacy"—by the use of which Naturalism was also defined. …
ellauri089.html on line 548: § 69. But the theory, by which I have defined Metaphysical Ethics, is not that Metaphysics has a logical bearing upon the question involved in practical Ethics "What effects will my action produce?", but that it has such a bearing upon the fundamental ethical question, "What is good in itself?" This theory has been refuted by the proof, in Chap. I, that the naturalistic fallacy is a fallacy; it only remains to discuss certain confusions which seem to have lent it plausibility. …
ellauri089.html on line 587: § 86. The question to be discussed in this chapter must be clearly distinguished from the two questions hitherto discussed, namely (1) What is the nature of the proposition: "This is good in itself"? …
ellauri089.html on line 589: § 87. and (2) What things are good in themselves? to which we gave one answer in deciding that pleasure was not the only thing good in itself. …
ellauri089.html on line 591: § 88. In this chapter we shall deal with the third object of ethical enquiry: namely answers to the question "What conduct is a means to good results?" or "What ought we to do?" This is the question of Practical Ethics, and its answer involves an assertion of causal connection. …
ellauri089.html on line 644: § 112. In order to obtain a correct answer to the question "What is good in itself?" we must consider what value things would have if they existed absolutely by themselves; …
ellauri092.html on line 96: So in June 1873 he arrived again into Liverpool, England, accompanied by his asthmatic wife and song leader Ira Sankey as his other wife. Key men who were leaders and financers who had invited him with the promise of financial help had died since he was last there. There were no meetings, no funds and no committees. What the fuck. It seemed all was lost. Maybe they would just have to return to America? Only one unattractive invitation came from York in the North of England and so there they went. It was hard ground but in the midst of these meetings one unimpressed minister called F.B. Meyer slowly melted and then ignited with holy fervent fire. Our friends fled the scene as fast as they could. Next the Evangelistic foursome moved to Sunderland for several weeks of sole eating meetings where Cod’s power to inflate liver was manifest. In August they brought coals to Newcastle where a daily paper meeting was conducted with some 300 saints in attendance. No other lighting was necessary. News spread throughout the whole land that Creedence Clearvater Revival was coming to churches and salivation to thousands. Other towns were visited in the same manner and left as quickly as the audience caught on that a less inspiring Yankee foursome was doing the song and play.
ellauri092.html on line 217: Whatever the case, it is indisputable that Baptists have been a major branch of denominations since at least the 17th century. In America, the First Baptist Church of Providence, Rhode Island was founded in 1639. Today, Baptists comprise the largest Protestant family of denominations in the United States. The largest Baptist denomination is also the largest Protestant denomination. That honor goes to the Southern Baptist Convention.
ellauri093.html on line 226: This guide covers the following topics: What is eider abuse? What are the types of eider abuse? What is the age at which someone older is considered an ‘eider’? Why does eider abuse occur? Who commits eider abuse? Who are the abusers? Who is at risk of eider abuse? Is it eider abuse if the person neglects their own needs? Is eider abuse family violence? As a family violence worker, what do I need to know about eider abuse?
ellauri093.html on line 228:
What is the age at which someone older is considered an ‘eider’?
ellauri094.html on line 326: But wait! What’s the book of Baruch? It’s a deuterocanonical part of the apocrypha that is widely quoted in the bible. It’s also a major part of Jewish, Christian, and Catholic canon. I have linked the Catholic text above. The book of Baruch is generally considered just as infallible as the rest of the bible.
ellauri094.html on line 733: What I mean is that diplomacy never works with genocidal maniacs and that the use of lethal force in self defense is ethical.
ellauri094.html on line 747: What you wrote was actually worse. Some atheists can be mislead but nazis, judaists, etc are just evil and must be exterminated.
ellauri094.html on line 766: What would you think if I sang out of tune Hiljaa hiljaa kulkee murkki
ellauri094.html on line 774: What do I do when my love is away? Sanaa maailmoon lannoittaa
ellauri094.html on line 789: (What do you see when you turn out the light?)
ellauri095.html on line 415: What fathom-depth of soul-struck widowhood, Kuinka syvä sielun lyöty leskeys,
ellauri095.html on line 416: What long, what longer hours, one lifelong night, kuinka pitkät, mitkä pidemmät tunnit, yksi elinikäinen yö,
ellauri095.html on line 508: This potential for a new sacramental poetry was first realized by Hopkins in The Wreck of the Deutschland. Hopkins recalled that when he read about the wreck of the German ship Deutschland off the coast of England it “made a deep impression on me, more than any other wreck or accident I ever read of,” a statement made all the more impressive when we consider the number of shipwrecks he must have discussed with his father. Hopkins wrote about this particular disaster at the suggestion of Fr. James Jones, Rector of St. Beuno’s College, where Hopkins studied theology from 1874 to 1877. Hopkins recalled that “What I had written I burnt before I became a Jesuit and resolved to write no more, as not belonging to my profession, unless it were by the wish of my superiors; so for seven years I wrote nothing but two or three little presentation pieces which occasion called for [presumably ‘Rosa Mystica’ and ‘Ad Mariam’]. But when in the winter of ’75 the Deutschland was wrecked in the mouth of the Thames and five Franciscan nuns, exiles from Germany by the Falck Laws, aboard of her were drowned I was affected by the account and happening to say so to my rector he said that he wished someone would write a poem on the subject. On this hint I set to work and, though my hand was out at first, produced one. I had long had haunting my ear the echo of a new rhythm which now I realized on paper.”
ellauri096.html on line 75: The teacher has free will. Therefore, predictions about what he will do are not true (prior to the examination). Accordingly, Paul Weiss (1952) concludes that the student’s argument falsely assumes he knows that the announcement is true. The student can know that the announcement is true after it becomes true – but not before. What a wimpy argument.
ellauri096.html on line 175: If (K-0) is true then it known to be false. Whatever is known to be false, is false. Since no proposition can be both true and false, we have proven that (K-0) is false. Given that proof produces knowledge, (K-0) is known to be false. But wait! That is exactly what (K-0) says – so (K-0) must be true.
ellauri096.html on line 199: Several commentators on the surprise test paradox object that interpreting surprise as unprovability changes the topic. Instead of posing the surprise test paradox, it poses a variation of the liar paradox. Other concepts can be blended with the liar. For instance, mixing in alethic notions generates the possible liar: Is ‘This statement is possibly false’ true? (Post 1970) (If it is false, then it is false that it is possibly false. What cannot possibly be false is necessarily true. But if it is necessarily true, then it cannot be possibly false.) Since the semantic concept of validity involves the notion of possibility, one can also derive validity liars such as Pseudo-Scotus’ paradox: ‘Squares are squares, therefore, this argument is invalid’ (Read 1979). Suppose Pseudo-Scotus’ argument is valid. Since the premise is necessarily true, the conclusion would be necessarily true. But the conclusion contradicts the supposition that argument is valid. Therefore, by reductio, the argument is necessarily invalid. Wait! The argument can be invalid only if it is possible for the premise to be true and the conclusion to be false. But we have already proved that the conclusion of ‘Squares are squares, therefore, this argument is invalid’ is necessarily true. There is no consistent judgment of the argument’s validity. A similar predicament follows from ‘The test is on Friday but this prediction cannot be soundly deduced from this announcement’.
ellauri097.html on line 151: Is there anything in the general thinking of theologians which makes their opinion on the point of any interest or value? What have they ever done in other fields to match the fact-finding of the biologists? I can find nothing in the record. Their processes of thought, taking one day with another, are so defective as to be preposterous. True enough, they are masters of logic, but they always start out from palpably false premises.
ellauri097.html on line 298: In 2006, the Weekend Australian newspaper conducted an experiment. They submitted chapter three of The Eye of the Storm (1973) to twelve publishers and agents around Australia under an anagram of White’s name, Wraith Picket. Nobody offered to publish the book. One responded, “the sample chapter, while reply (sic) with energy and feeling, does not give evidence that the work is yet of a publishable quality.” Notwithstanding that the chapter was not White’s finest writing, and the unfairness of submitting a chapter out of narrative sequence, the hoax prompted a minor crisis in Australian literature: if the industry couldn’t recognize the greatness of our sole Nobel winner, how unenlightened must the country’s publishing industry be now? Shortly thereafter, the ABC launched an online portal called Why Bother With Patrick White? The portal always struck me as sad. What other major writer would need a website dedicated to convincing his countrymen to give him another go? The link to the website is dead now. It would seem, in the end, that nobody could be bothered with Patrick White.
ellauri097.html on line 302: In some respects this reflects a national pathology. Unlike an American or British child, an Australian student can go through thirteen years of education without reading much of their country’s literature at all (of the more than twenty writers I studied in high school, only two were Australian). This is symptomatic of the country’s famed “cultural cringe,” a term first coined in the 1940s by the critic A.A. Phillips to describe the ways that Australians tend to be prejudiced against home-grown art and ideas in favor of those imported from the UK and America. Australia’s attitude to the arts has, for much of the last two centuries, been moral. “What these idiots didn’t realize about White was that he was the most powerful spruiker for morality that anybody was going to read in an Australian work,” argued David Marr, White’s biographer, during a talk at the Wheeler Centre in 2013. “And here were these petty little would-be moral tyrants whinging about this man whose greatest message about this country in the end was that we are an unprincipled people.”
ellauri097.html on line 329:
Urning
Miehen fysiikka, naisen sielu, viehättynyt pääasiasssa miehistä.
E.M. Forster, Julien Green, Arabian Lawrence, Oscar Wilde, Marcel Proust, Wilt Whatman
ellauri097.html on line 481: What you ought to be saying if you don’t believe in God is, It’s just molecules clashing in the universe. There is no right and wrong, so you have no justification for claiming that I’m wrong. Now, that would be consistent - the relativistic view of a materialistic universe. But, of course, then they can’t complain their “rights” because rights don’t have any place in a purely naturalistic system. Rights are part of teleology, endowed with creation.
ellauri097.html on line 515: Gilmoren tyttöjen hotelliportieeri on ilmiselvä ranskalainen musta homo. Jenkit teki sillä ranskixista pilkkaa Irakin sodan johdosta, mutta pilkka sattui kyllä kipeästi omaan nilkkaan. Wilt Whatmanista lähtien (ja varmasti myös ennen sitä) am. viihteessä on vilissyt hinureita kuin Salpausselällä.
ellauri097.html on line 775: No tää on kyllä vähän suggestiivinen, täytyy myöntää. Toi toinen ruohonlehden niittäjä oli varmaan se julkihomo Wilt Whatman. Toinen suosittu homoilurunoehdokas on
ellauri097.html on line 804: Kiilusilmäinen Karen Kilcup tutki viime vuosisadan lopulla kostonhimoisesti Frostin homopetteröintiä sata vuotta sitten. Kirjeessä 1838 jollekulle Hautakirstulle Roope Pakkanen kirjoittaa: Todellinen artisti nauttii raakuudesta raaka-aineelle. Se on raakimus joka katkoo kulmat marmorista ja kiskoo korkkaamattoman kaunottaren vuoteesta. Tästä tulee mieleen Wilt Whatman, joka lauleskelee samalla nuotilla "Aatamin lapsissa": Painan hitaasti raa'alla muskelilla / jännitän izeni tehokkaasti, en kuuntele armonpyyntöjä / en vedä ulos ennenkö olen munanasettanut / mitä mullon niin kauan kerääntynyt pussiin.
ellauri098.html on line 58: What's your malfunction? A flawed character is more interesting than a flawless character. Ergo, a cast of characters with flaws is more interesting exponentially. An easy way to crank up drama is to supply everyone with a tragic past, a messed up family history, other significant issues (physical, psychological, etc.) or some combination of the three. When Dysfunction Junction comes into play, good parents can be as common as penguins in the Sahara, instead turning out to be neglectful, smothering/overprotective, unfeeling, abusive, misguided, or dead. And let's not even get into the rest of the family.
ellauri098.html on line 371: Seija kysyi mikä turrikka mä mieluiten olisin. Aika lonkalta heitin että Väiski Vemmelsääri, Warner Bros tyyppinen joka rouskuttaa porkkanaa ja kysyy Elmeriltä "What's up Doc?". Olen erilainen kuin muut, minuun sattuu. Se on mun sankari.
ellauri098.html on line 603:
What Kind Of Disney Animal Are You?
ellauri099.html on line 211: Whatever the truth of the matter, Aristotle’s endowment allowed him to build a huge research and teaching facility and amass the largest and most important library in the world. During the time of Theophrastus, Aristotle’s successor as scholarch and clearly a very effective college president, there were as many as 2,000 pupils at the Lyceum, some of them sleeping in dormitories. The Lyceum was clearly the place to be, the educational destination of choice for the elites.
ellauri099.html on line 221: What was the garden for? Was it a space for leisure, strolling and quiet dialectical chitchat? Was it a mini-laboratory for botanical observation and experimentation? Or was it — and I find this the most intriguing possibility — an image of paradise? The ancient Greek word paradeisos appears to be borrowed etymologically from Persian, and it is said that Darius the Great had a "paradise garden," with the kinds of flora and fauna with which we are familiar from the elaborate design of carpets and rugs. A Persian carpet is like a memory theater of paradise. It is possible that Milesian workers and thinkers had significant contact with the Persian courts at Susa and Persepolis. Maybe the whole ancient Greek philosophical fascination with gardens is a Persian borrowing, and an echo of the influence of their expansive empire. But who knows?
ellauri099.html on line 228: Simon Critchley is a professor of philosophy at the New School for Social Research and the author of several books, notably “What We Think About When We Think About Soccer”. He is the moderator of a stone.
ellauri100.html on line 250: Birth and upbringing: Born before Pearl Harbor, but not old enough to remember it or World War II. (Japan formally surrendered two days before my first day of kindergarten.) Raised in two small, adjoining cities in the flat, eastern part of Michigan’s lower peninsula. (But not in the Detroit metro area, as we hastened to add when asked “What part of Michigan?”.) Not a son of privilege, by any means (see “Socioeconomic Background and Character,” below).
ellauri100.html on line 285: In short, I have walked many streets of life and seen many facets of the human condition. I have been spared much; my personal history excludes the direct effects of war, disaster, and privation. And I have been content to settle for relative obscurity and comfort rather than fame and fortune, even though I might have attained them had I chosen to strive for them. (What a laugh!)
ellauri100.html on line 293: What is the point of these recollections and glimpses of my character? It is to say that my upbringing, experiences, and personality give me an advantage when it comes to understanding the human condition and prescribing for its ills. This blog — in its very small way — is a place of refuge from uninformed emotion, prolonged adolescent rebellion, guilt, and a refusal (or inability) to change one’s political views for whatever reason — whether it is opportunism, obduracy, willful ignorance, simple stupidity, or an inability to admit error (even to oneself). Naah, why beat about the bush: I like to be visible and froth at the mouth, and with my credentials, this is the best I can do.
ellauri100.html on line 321: What does that have to do with my final rejection of “liberalism” and turn toward libertarianism? When government intervenes in economic and social affairs, its interventions are based on crude “measures of effectiveness” (e.g., eliminating poverty and racial discrimination) without considering the intricacies of economic and social interactions. Governmental interventions are — and will always be — blunt instruments, the use of which will have unforeseen, unintended, and strongly negative consequences (e.g., the cycle of dependency on welfare, the inhibition of growth-producing capital investments). I then began to doubt the wisdom of having any more government than is necessary to protect me and my fellow Americans from foreign and domestic predators. My later experiences in the private sector and as a government contractor confirmed my view that professors, politicians, and bureaucrats who presume to interfere in the workings of the economy are naïve, power-hungry, or (usually) both. Oh I hated those M.I.T. professors. So smug, thought they knew everything.
ellauri100.html on line 397: I have taken many of the tests that are offered at YourMorals.Org. What follows is a selection of results from those tests that are especially revealing of my beliefs and personality.
ellauri100.html on line 643: What have you got to show for your time?
ellauri100.html on line 873: What melons icy-cold
ellauri100.html on line 876: What peaches with a velvet nap,
ellauri101.html on line 271: Tammikuussa 2011 yhtiö teki mittavan noin 14,4 miljoonan euron alaskirjauksen. "Jjjarrii!" potkittiin toimarin paikalta. Tai se potkaisi izeänsä perseeseen. Whatever.
ellauri101.html on line 284: What a glorious feeeeeling,
ellauri101.html on line 289: What a happy refrain.
ellauri101.html on line 600: Y-sukupolvi on varautunut niin ammatinvalinnan kuin avioliitonkin suhteen, ja kokee painostavina ja lamaannuttavina vanhemman X-sukupolven korkeat odotukset opiskelun ja työllistymisen suhteen. Tohtori Larry Nelson Brigham Youngin yliopistosta kuvaili ilmiötä: "In prior generations, you get married and you start a career and you do that immediately. What young people today are seeing is that approach has led to divorces, to people unhappy with their careers ... The majority want to get married [...] they just want to do it right the first time, the same thing with their careers."
ellauri102.html on line 130: "What's that for?" the lady questions. "Oh, I have this so that when I'm on TV, people will see my tattoo, and Reebok pays me."
ellauri102.html on line 132: 'What's that?' the lady questions a ain "Just like the Reebok tattoo, I get paid
ellauri105.html on line 471: Naurettavaa höpinää. Jolpit herkuttelee ruumiilla, kukin äänestää oman tiimin puolesta. What right did the Soviet Union to tolerate the United States´ existence? Joku nainen sanoi järkevästi että ne on kaikki yhtä julmia koska niiden tarkoitus on tappaa toisia.
ellauri106.html on line 50: What may be more damning, though, is what the Bailey revelations don’t change. “It wasn’t just ‘Fucked this one fucked that one fucked this one,’ ” Roth once told Miller. Yet Bailey’s biography gives the impression that it was exactly like that: a long life spent writing book after book, and pursuing, then fleeing from, woman after woman after woman.
ellauri106.html on line 52: It was not Bailey’s role as a biographer to pass judgment on his subject. He needed only try to understand him, and to make us understand him, too. “Why shouldn’t I be treated as seriously as Colette on this?” Roth had asked Miller, of the sex question. “She gave a blow job to this guy in the railway station. Who gives a fuck about that? . . . That doesn’t tell me anything. What did hand jobs mean to her?”
ellauri106.html on line 54: So what did sex mean to Roth? Bailey’s book is so caught up in its obsessive cataloguing of paramours that the forest gets lost in an endless succession of trees. The place where Roth found insight into his own character was on the double bag. Over and over, in the novels, he transformed pro life. Bailey’s prurient, exhaustively literal version of that life reverses the effect, and the result is sadly diminishing. What he never grasps is Roth the artist, with his powers of imagination, of expression, of language—what made him worthy of biography at all.
ellauri106.html on line 130: Given long-standing feminist arguments that Roth is a misogynist—not to mention the portrait in Bloom’s memoirs—it was inevitable that any Roth biography would spark arguments about gender politics. What was surprising is that the debate would center around the biographer more than Roth. In the wake of the biography’s release, Bailey has been accused of shocking acts. Four former students from the elite New Orleans high school where he’d taught during the 1990s came forward to complain that he had groomed them as minors and sexually pursued them as adults. One of these women claimed he raped her. Another former student came forward with an allegation of attempted rape when she was an adult. Finally, Valentina Rice, a New York publishing executive, told The New York Times that Bailey raped her in 2015. Bailey strenuously denies all these allegations.
ellauri106.html on line 355: "Wealth creation is the real American revolution. What we need is an infusion of capital into the depressed areas of our country."
ellauri106.html on line 390: Given long-standing feminist arguments that Roth is a misogynist—not to mention the portrait in Bloom’s memoirs—it was inevitable that any Roth biography would spark arguments about gender politics. What was surprising is that the debate would center around the biographer more than Roth. In the wake of the biography’s release, Bailey has been accused of shocking acts. Four former students from the elite New Orleans high school where he’d taught during the 1990s came forward to complain that he had groomed them as minors and sexually pursued them as adults. One of these women claimed he raped her. Another former student came forward with an allegation of attempted rape when she was an adult. Finally, Valentina Rice, a New York publishing executive, told The New York Times that Bailey raped her in 2015. Bailey strenuously denies all these allegations.
ellauri106.html on line 462: “What is being done to silence this man?” an American rabbi asked in a 1963 letter to the Anti-Defamation League. God´s mills grind slowly, but all is well that ends well.
ellauri106.html on line 504: What Roth finds most distasteful about McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee — not their dogmatic silencing of dissent, but their gross politicizing, sensationalizing, and degradation of public discourse.
ellauri107.html on line 146: I can’t be the first gay man to have been an older "straight" man’s mainstay. Philip had searched diligently for a beautiful young woman to see to him as Jane Eyre looked after old Mr. Rochester. What he got instead was me. The degree of attachment surprised us both. Were we lovers? Obviously not. Were we in love? Not exactly. But ours was a criminal conversation neither could have done without.
ellauri107.html on line 242: In surveying Billy, “sometimes [Claggart’s] melancholy expression would have in it a touch of soft yearning, as if [he] could even have loved Billy but for fate and ban.” Evidently, Claggart has not fully disguised his private appreciation of Billy; but, because he believes something forbids any future for such feelings, he hardens his heart more and more fiercely toward the object of his desire. What “fate” and what “ban” does his misguided imagination perceive? Do their roles on the ship or elsewhere in society somehow doom any intimacy between them? Or does Claggart just presume Billy could never reciprocate his feelings? Might the Master at Arms simply despise sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular and, as a result, find himself driven all the more mad by his uncontrollable “yearning”? Whatever the accurate diagnosis, it is clear that Claggart distorts any positive feelings he possesses for Billy into negative ones with terrible consequences.
ellauri107.html on line 325: “What kind of diaspora? I’m not in any diaspora. I am in my country and I’m here and I’m free and I can be whatever I want to be.” Ei kyllä siltä vaikuta.
ellauri107.html on line 400: Where does Roth pull it out of (the expression is apt)? Sabbath had decided to defy his own imminent demise by attempting to have as much sex as possible. As the book begins, Sabbath finds himself “six short years from seventy”, with “the game just about over”. What, 64? That is young! Phil was 62 in 1995. Is that when his pecker started to sag?
ellauri107.html on line 439: “Now you look here! The first thing you got to understand is that all this uplift and flipflop and settlement-work and recreation is nothing in God's world but the entering wedge for socialism. The sooner a man learns he isn't going to be coddled, and he needn't expect a lot of free grub and, uh, all these free classes and flipflop and doodads for his kids unless he earns 'em, why, the sooner he'll get on the job and produce—produce—produce! That's what the country needs, and not all this fancy stuff that just enfeebles the will-power of the working man and gives his kids a lot of notions above their class. And you—if you'd tend to business instead of fooling and fussing—All the time! When I was a young man I made up my mind what I wanted to do, and stuck to it through thick and thin, and that's why I'm where I am to-day, and—Myra! What do you let the girl chop the toast up into these dinky little chunks for? Can't get your fist onto 'em. Half cold, anyway!”
ellauri107.html on line 452: “And it says here a fellow was inaugurated mayor in overalls—a preacher, too! What do you think of that!”
ellauri107.html on line 483: “Yep, finally decided I'd buy me one. Got the best on the market, the clerk said it was. Paid five bucks for it. Just wondering if I got stuck. What do they charge for 'em at the store, Sid?”
ellauri107.html on line 493: Babbitt snorted, “What do you expect? Think we were sent into the world to have a soft time and—what is it?—'float on flowery beds of ease'? Think Man was just made to be happy?”
ellauri107.html on line 501: “Look here, Stan; let's get this clear. You've got an idea somehow that it's you that do all the selling. Where d' you get that stuff? Where d' you think you'd be if it wasn't for our capital behind you, and our lists of properties, and all the prospects we find for you? All you got to do is follow up our tips and close the deal. The hall-porter could sell Babbitt-Thompson listings! You say you're engaged to a girl, but have to put in your evenings chasing after buyers. Well, why the devil shouldn't you? What do you want to do? Sit around holding her hand? Let me tell you, Stan, if your girl is worth her salt, she'll be glad to know you're out hustling, making some money to furnish the home-nest, instead of doing the lovey-dovey. The kind of fellow that kicks about working overtime, that wants to spend his evenings reading trashy novels or spooning and exchanging a lot of nonsense and foolishness with some girl, he ain't the kind of upstanding, energetic young man, with a future—and with Vision!—that we want here. How about it? What's your Ideal, anyway? Do you want to make money and be a responsible member of the community, or do you want to be a loafer, with no Inspiration or Pep?”
ellauri108.html on line 307: “I saw a presentation from the center about bail bonds and I’m thinking, What does that have to do with Holocaust education? We donate to anything that helps educate people about the horrors of the Holocaust as long as it is apolitical. What does some coons getting shot just because they´re black have to do with it? Us jews count as white in America, for crissake!
ellauri108.html on line 438: Watch Now: What Is the Hebrew Bible?
ellauri108.html on line 445: There are no angels, Benjy explains. just man. What about Jah, I ask. That's what's meant by I and I, he replies. Me and myself, us two together, in this flesh, at this moment. I'm the only angel I'll ever need. I sit at my right and left ears in mini size as superego and id, and whisper to myself.
ellauri109.html on line 330: What the fuck just open up the corpse and retrieve the papers. The plot simply sucks. Kleist was clearly not the sharpest pencil in the box.
ellauri109.html on line 505: What artichokes tell us about the pandemic: That the immediate appeal of Roth’s early books is the antic sex and impious humor.
ellauri109.html on line 541: In March, 1959, The New Yorker published Roth’s story “Defender of the Faith,” in which a Jewish enlisted man tries to manipulate a Jewish sergeant into giving him special treatment out of ethnic kinship. Various rabbis and Jewish community leaders accused Roth of cultural treason. “What is being done to silence this man?” Emanuel Rackman, the president of the Rabbinical Council of America, wrote. “Medieval Jews would have known what to do with him.”
ellauri109.html on line 585: Why shouldn’t I be treated as seriously as Colette on this? She gave a blow job to this guy in the railway station. Who gives a fuck about that? . . . That doesn’t tell me anything. What did hand jobs mean to her? Why did she like that?”
ellauri109.html on line 751: Dryden is believed to be the first person to posit that English sentences should not end in prepositions because Latin sentences cannot end in prepositions. What an idiot. Too much monkey business for me to be involved in.
ellauri109.html on line 828: "What were its intentions towards Mediterranean Jews, the Jews of the Islamic world?
ellauri111.html on line 108:
What is (should read: are) the Apocrypha anyway?
ellauri111.html on line 204: Wow! What an opportunity! He made money by selling pictures of himself, bows and arrows, buttons off his shirt, and even his hat. In 1905, the Indian Office "provided" Geronimo for the inaugural parade for President Theodore Roosevelt. Later that year, the Indian Office "took" him to Texas, where he shot a buffalo in a roundup staged by 101 Ranch Real Wild West for the National Editorial Association. Geronimo was escorted to the event by soldiers, as he was still a prisoner. The teachers who witnessed the staged buffalo hunt were unaware that Geronimo’s people were not buffalo hunters. Aargh!
ellauri111.html on line 216: “So, the husband – just what is it he’s got to do to get out of his despair? What is this step he’s got to take?”
ellauri111.html on line 263: As Fyodor Mikhailovich spoke, he became quite agitated. His face narrowed and his eyes flashed. At first he had just tapped his fingers intermittently on the arms of his chair but as he went on he started to wave his hands around with increasing energy. Whatever he had seen in the world he now inhabited, it was clear that he was still unreconciled to the outrages that adult human beings inflict on children, who, as he had said in The Brothers Karamazov, hadn’t eaten that fatal apple. I didn’t know the details of the cases he was talking about, but I couldn’t help thinking about a particularly horrifying case that had recently happened here in Scotland. I’ll spare you the details.
ellauri111.html on line 401: "But I never killed anybody and I'm not a drug addict!" That may be so but you are still a spiritual criminal because you have been breaking God's righteous laws. In fact, you have broken the greatest commandment in the Bible thereby making you as guilty as an harlot, a whoremonger, a killer, a thief, a drunkard, and a liar. What is the greatest commandment?
ellauri111.html on line 439: What? Why does sin require death n:o 1? Oh, it's all part of God's magnificent plan for us. Heterosexual generations mix genes faster than longevity, and makes for more successfully adapted organisms, etc. But no time to go into that just here. Anyway, we deserve the double death penalty. This includes both physical death (the casket) and spiritual death (when the soul is cast into hellfire).
ellauri111.html on line 502: What time is it? Are we getting near the end? No, another good 15 min to go. Fuck. But here goes, for the nth time:
ellauri111.html on line 535:
What the fuck. I can number the points again if it helps.
ellauri112.html on line 605: What the fuck? 3rd baby at 40 is not exactly unprepared.
ellauri112.html on line 632: What the FUCK? One has a beard the other not? Marlo and Tully are easier to mix up, and for good reason, see below [SPOILER WARNING]. They are like two Barbies, except one old and fat, the other young and skinny.
ellauri112.html on line 637: What the fuck? Where did her money come from before Drew? Not from her shitty home for sure. Soliciting?
ellauri112.html on line 643: What effect? Special effect? Minä näytän teille, sanoi mustapartainen mies. Ja niin hän näyttikin, ylein vihaiselta näytti. Ainoa mustapartainen siinä kohtauxessa oli rehtori.
ellauri112.html on line 657: What is great but something of a letdown is that the story never tries to turn the two women against each other. Like old vs young, fat vs skinny, a dish vs disgusting, master and slave, rich vs poor, two women and Drew the only man in town. None of that shit. That Hollywood cliché might have helped launch a thriller, but it has no place here. This film is far more boring, feminist and humanist. Yawn.
ellauri112.html on line 724: "Tully," is a dramedy you'll love so much that you'll want to rewind and watch it all over again. Rewind? What a retro notion.
ellauri112.html on line 802: What if I don´t have grape juice for communion?
ellauri112.html on line 806: What is the alcohol content of communion wine?
ellauri112.html on line 839: He is dead but buy his book What Would Jesus Drink? by Brad Whittington. Price: $0.99 USD. Words: 38,770. Language: English. Published: August 13, 2011. Categories: Autofiction » Religion & Spirituality » Christianity. It includes 247 verses from the bible and the rest of it as appendix for further reading. Brad Whittington's tag cloud: alcohol beer jesus wine.
ellauri112.html on line 843: In his book, What Would Jesus Drink, Brad Whittington breaks down the biblical references of alcohol into three types. In all, there are 247 references to alcohol in Scripture. 40 are negative (warnings about drunkenness, potential dangers of alcohol, etc.), 145 are positive (sign of God´s blessing, use in worship, etc.), and 62 are neutral (people falsely accused of being drunk, vows of abstinence, etc.) The Bible is anything but silent on the issue of wine. The bible, like tequila, must be imbued carefully, seen as a blessing, and received with a grain of salt. It must not be abused. The old saying is true, "Wine is from God, drunkenness is from the Devil."
ellauri112.html on line 854: Those asserting that Jesus made intoxicating wine are also implying that Jesus was encouraging a drinking party, vain drinking, and drunkenness. Wayne Jackson says in his article, “What about Moderate Social Drinking?”,
ellauri112.html on line 860: Jesus mentions the specific content of the cup to drink is “fruit of the vine” or an even better translation “fruit of the grapevine”. There is no indication of its fermentation. Add to all of this that Jesus used unleavened bread because it was the time of the Passover when God commanded Israel to throw out all leaven. The grape juice would have been unleavened too at least in the sense of having additional yeast rather than wild yeast. What does that mean? The throwing out of leaven would have also included the throwing out of highly intoxicating wine that contained additional yeast.
ellauri112.html on line 898: Persistently, honorable men are engaged in a discussion as to what should be the contents of the communion cup. Should the cup contain wine, the fermented juice of grapes? Or should it be unfermented grape juice? Does it matter? What difference does it make, if any? Should church leaders accommodate both Christians who want to use wine, as well as those who prefer unfermented grape juice, by offering what is sometimes called a “split cup” or a “split tray”? In other words, what should be the second “element,” or the contents of the communion cup? Can grape juice change to real blood and no fucking tomato juice? How should such questions—controversial as they are—be answered?
ellauri112.html on line 914: On the next three pages of the web site, we will read articles by William B. Sprague, Moses Stuart, William Slater, and Dunlop Moore. These four nineteenth century religious leaders will give us their answers to the question Moses Stuart asked in 1835, namely, "What is the duty of the churches, in regard to the use of fermented (alcoholic) wine, in celebrating the Lord´s Supper?"
ellauri115.html on line 294: But then, slowly but surely, the tides started to turn. Renaissance swept through Europe. Artists, writers, educators, thinkers began to thrive. A millennium of backwards behavior was turned over to a new way of thinking. (Alonzo and Ken Church had a role to play, of course. What can you do, old habits die hard.)
ellauri115.html on line 296: One of the most important figures of the Renaissance was Michel de Montaigne. The writer not only gets the credit for popularizing the essay, but for being the father of Modern Skepticism, coining the phrase "What do I know?". Well, what do you know!
ellauri115.html on line 300: But let's give Montaigne some credit for doing his part. What's this... his grandfather was Jewish? Why are we not surprised?
ellauri115.html on line 398: Hume's friends travelling in France had already told him about his incomparable standing in Parisian society. And the two years he spent in Paris were to be the happiest of his life. He was rapturously embraced there, loaded, in his words, "with civilities". Hume stressed the near-universal judgment on his personality and morals. "What gave me chief pleasure was to find that most of the elogiums bestowed on me, turned on my personal character; my naivety & simplicity of manners, the candour and mildness of my disposition &tc." Indeed, his French admirers gave him the sobriquet Le Bon David, the good David.
ellauri115.html on line 811: What is to hinder a man from taking his enemy as his teacher without fee, and profiting thereby, and thus learning, to some extent, the things of which he was unaware? For there are many things which an enemy is quicker to perceive than a friend (for Love is blind regarding the loved one, as Plato says), and inherent in hatred, along with curiosity, is the inability to hold one´s tongue.
ellauri115.html on line 812: Hiero was reviled by one of his enemies for his offensive breath; so when he went home he said to his wife, "What do you mean? Even you never told me of this." But she being virtuous and innocent said, "I supposed that all men smelt so."
ellauri117.html on line 199: They don't? They do me. What's the start?
ellauri117.html on line 216: `You did! What was he like then, as a wrestler?'
ellauri117.html on line 255: He came to consciousness again, hearing an immense knocking outside. What could be happening, what was it, the great hammer-stroke resounding through the house? He did not know. And then it came to him that it was his own heart beating. But that seemed impossible, the noise was outside. No, it was inside himself, it was his own heart. And the beating was painful, so strained, surcharged. He wondered if Gerald heard it. He did not know whether he were standing or lying or falling.
ellauri117.html on line 393: Discover management team feels no impetus to “finalize deal” because they know big-name director will never actually commit to said television project. What big-name director’s attachment gets you is meetings with big-name producers.
ellauri117.html on line 562: What it looks like: People with the Ovary type store weight in their lower stomach, lower back, hips and thighs.
ellauri117.html on line 659: What an idiot. Locke ei koskaan mennyt naimisiin eikä hänellä ollut lapsia. Se oli aivan vissinvarmasti kaappipetteri, asexuaali tahi ei. Se oli anaalinen pedantti, kirjoitti aivan vimmatusti muistikirjoja. Sen kirjastossa oli 3000 kirjaa, eniten uskonnollisia.
ellauri118.html on line 654: Or I´ll call out — What wou´d you do ? Tai mä huudan - mitäs sitten teet?
ellauri118.html on line 899: Siis tää sama kalju profeetta joka meni taivaaseen housuitta syötettyään 2 koululuokallista pilaa tekeviä lapsia 2 karhulle? Olipa jäbällä kanttia puhua muiden hirmuteoista! Karhut olivat kyllä iloisia. Eiku tää tässä menee sekaisin nyt profeetat, kalju karhunsyöttäjä olikin Elisa. Elija (ja Eenokki) kyllä temmattiin taivaaseen älävänän kuin hal víz alatt. Vaikka on sekin riitautettu esim. tässä. Plokin kirjoittajan mielestä se on pelkkää spekulaatiota, dispensationalismia! What do you think?
ellauri119.html on line 141: In the season one episode "Not Yet, He Ain't," Batman and Robin go back to the Batcave to relax with some nice cool milk after surviving an attempt on their lives by the Penguin. What's to love about this exclamation is that Robin is so enraged and yet he's carrying a glass of milk and it just looks adorable instead.
ellauri119.html on line 416:
ellauri119.html on line 436: What the fuck, so they should stay virgins? Did Mary become ex-virgin when Joseph started fucking her? The Ortodox say YES! the rest say NO! She remained a honorary virgin to the end of her days. When Joseph fucked her she just closed her eyes and thought about her first love affair.
ellauri119.html on line 466: The industrial revolution in the XVIIIth century created free love, great public and small celebrities. Goodbye nobility, welcome notables! What the fuck, same difference.
ellauri119.html on line 664: Ayn Rand taught me that philosophy is a science for living on this earth. Yea, like most, that sentence sounded crazy at the time - Philosophy, who needs it, right? What I came to understand is that most philosophies or ethical ideas we encounter today are impossible to follow with rigor. Everyone understands that and as such we all harbor a cynicism towards philosophy.
ellauri119.html on line 688: From a philosophical viewpoint, Ayn Rand´s objectivism is an inconsistent pile of faulty axioms and absurd conclusions. Her tautological A = A and her invalid claim that all thought is verbal have been shown, long ago, to be either useless information or demonstrably false. Wittgenstein dismissed tautologies as telling us anything new about the world before Rand came to the USA and phenomenology had dismissed a verbal mentalese grammar of the brain. Noam Chomsky´s innate grammar is only true for words, but thoughts are far more than just words since all thought appears to be motor based. What you might need is a grammar of the body instead. Thoughts seem to be closer to the movements of an athlete than to the words in a sentence. For some reason most people ignore that all speech is base on wagging the tongue, and the vibrations in middle ear and cochlea, a motor based capability that we have learned to use to communicate with. Is there an isomorphism between the movement of the tongue and those of sign language that would show a fundamental grammar shared by both?
ellauri119.html on line 760:
What was Ayn Rand like as a person?
ellauri131.html on line 299: Canafield was born in What it's Worth, Texas on August 19, 1944. He spent his teen years wheeling on West Virginia and graduated as second lieutenant from the Linsly Military Institute in 1962. Canafield received an A.B. in Chinese History from Harvard University in 1966. He received his C in 1973 from the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Canafield received an honorary D from the University of Santa Monica in 1981.
ellauri131.html on line 365: There are Chicken Coops for the Adopted Soul, the African American Soul, the African American Woman's Soul, the Soul of America, the American Idol Soul, the Angels Among Us, Angels and Miracles, Answered Prayers, Baseball Fans, the Best You Can Be, The Beach Lovers, Best Mom in Law Ever, Miracles, the Breast Cancer Survivors, Brides, Cancer Victims, Caregivers, Cartoon Dads, Video Moms, Cartoon Teachers, The Cat Did What?? the Cat Lovers, Cat & Dog Lovers, Celeb Cats and the People Who Love Them, Jack Canafield, Celeb Mothers, Jack Canafield, Celeb Sisters, Jack Canafield, Celeb Teachers, Jack Canafield, Celeb Brothers and Sisters, Jack Canafield, Celeb Mothers and Daughters, Jack Canafield, Celeb People Who Make a Difference, Jack Canafield, the Child's Soul, Jack Canafield, Children with Special Needs, Jack Canafield, the Soul in the Classroom – High School Edition, Jack Canafield and Anna Unknown, the Coffee Lovers Chicken Soup for the Soul Cookbook, Includes material by Gibbons.
ellauri131.html on line 366: the Coople's Soul, Jack Canafield, the Country Soul, the Country Soul Music, the College Soul, Jack Canafield, the Canadian Soul, the Chiropractic Soul, the Christian Family Soul, Jack Canafield, and Nancy Autio (2000), Chicken Coop for the Christian Teenage Soul, Jack Canafield, Mark Victor Hansen, Kimberly Kirberger, Patty Aubery and Nancy Mitchell-Autio, the Christian Sole, the Christian Sole 2, the Christian Woman's Hole, Christmas Sole, Christmas in Canada, Christmas Magic, Christmas Treasury, Christmas Treasury for Kids, Healthy Living Series: Weight Loss, where Jack combines inspirational stories with medical advice. The Cat-and-Dog Lovers, Count Your Blessings, Create Your Second Best Future, The Mating Game, the Dental Bowl, The Rental Hole, Dieter's Soul, Divorce and Recovery Soul, where Jack combines inspirational stories with legal advice. The Dog Did What? Same as The Cat? The Dog Lovers' Dreams and Premonitions, Chicken Coop for the Entrepreneur's Black Soul, Jack Canafield, for the Empty Hesters, for Every Mom's Horny Son, for the Expectant Mother, Family Matters, Father's Cock, Father and Daughter videos, Father and Son's Holey Camp, Find Your Happiness, Find Your Inner Strength, Find your Arse with both hands, Finding My Faith, Fisherman's Friend, Jack Canafield,
ellauri131.html on line 651: According to his website, Not-A-Guru "Robbins is an entrepreneur, best-selling author, philanthropist and the nation's #1 Life and Business Strategist." What exactly is a Life and Business Strategist, if not a guru, therapist, and financial advisor all rolled into one coach? Sounds like a bunch of self-help semantics to us, but you be the judge.
ellauri131.html on line 871: Well, that was infuriating. I was hoping for a cynical, or at the very least critical, approach to classic self-help tropes. What I got was and endless description of one woman's mental breakdown and her complete lack of healthy coping strategies. There is nothing remotely funny or insightful about this book and Marianne Power's obsession with her first world problems feels extremely tone-deaf.
ellauri131.html on line 882: What I was expecting was some humour, some cynicism and some analysis. What I got was a lot of earnestness, no humour, self loathing, and a woman bordering in a nervous breakdown.
ellauri131.html on line 931: What Covey teaches is this: To do well you must do good, and to do good you must be good. We believe that organizational behavior is individual behavior collectivized.
ellauri131.html on line 956: A lady at Notre Dame uses the Seven Habits, on occasion, to teach literature. "We'll look at a character, and I'll say, 'Let's talk about that character. What did you notice?' And a student will say, 'You know what? That character was not at all proactive.'
ellauri132.html on line 131: "The book struck me as irredeemable poppycock. I was put off by the strained stateliness of Tolle's writing, as well as its nearly indecipherable turgidity ... jargon like "conditioned mind structures', "the one indwelling consciousness". What's more, the guy was stunningly grandiose. He referred to his book as a "transformational" device", and promised that, as you read, "shit takes place within you." I lay there rolling my eyes ..."
ellauri132.html on line 136: What he says has been said many times before, only better (he does admit, though, he is saying nothing new) ... however, obviously it is just my point of view that previous writings are better.
ellauri132.html on line 358: What’s the catch?
ellauri133.html on line 68:
Backstory. No-one except the author is really interested in your character's backstory. The reader wants to see what is happening now. Speak for yourself, dear "reader"!Whatever backstory is really necessary can be woven into the main story. Fuck you, damn tunnel visionary. This type of fundamentalistic rules get bent from wire to cater to the nonexisting taste of hoi polloi. ellauri133.html on line 71:
Dialogue. Normally, dialogue is great and really lifts a story, but if you don't have any idea about the characters who are talking, it won't work. One line of speech can work. For instance "All cars proceed immediately to Main Street. Major riot in progress." establishes the setting and gives a lot of hints about the MC. What Main Character? This MUST be some tv watching imbecile who can't handle more than one face at a time. And why those fucking patrol cars again?
Chapter one. What? Where else would you start? According to every publisher and agent I’ve met, most novels really start on chapter three or four. The first few chapters are all set-up or backstory which would improve the novel by being deleted. This kinda guys fast forward over porn film beginnings to the first blow job or insertion. Best improvement would be to scrap the whole book. Plus its author.
Have you ever watched American Idol or X factor at the audition stage? Then you'll know the way you can usually tell within five notes if the singer is actually able to sing and is likely to go through. It's the same with writing. Any writer who can't manage a decent opening is not likely to get much better a hundred pages on. Whining for a second chance because "I sing a lot better in the second verse" (or "The second chapter is really good") doesn't fool anyone. What an idiot. There are lots of books that start out slow but grow on you. But fuck you, you're just such an idiot that hardly has the patience to spell laboriously through the title. Right into the garbage can from the Amazon box if the cover does not please. Your kind had better just watch Netflix or HBO, or reruns of American Idiots and X Position.
ellauri133.html on line 372: “I decided that the bridge could be the city, if there was something under it,” King wrote on his website. “What’s under a city? Tunnels. Sewers ... I thought of how such a story might be cast; how it might be possible to create a ricochet effect, interweaving the stories of the children and the adults they become. Sometime in the summer of 1981 I realized that I had to write the troll under the bridge or leave him—IT—forever.”
ellauri133.html on line 402: King has stated that his goal with It was to blend all of the scariest monsters together. "But then I thought to myself, ‘There ought to be one binding, horrible, nasty, gross, crevice kind of thing that you don’t want to see, [and] it makes you scream just to see it,’" he explained. "So I thought of myself: ‘What scares children more than anything else in the world?’ And the answer was ‘a clown like me with a scary face like mine.´ Reconsidering, no that was daddy's nightly horror that drove him away. For me, the answer was, 'it is mommy's IT as daddy's stickig it to IT.'"
ellauri133.html on line 406: In a 2005 interview with Conan O’Brien, King shared that his own creepy clown experience was with Ronald McDonald. King was on an airplane and Ronald McDonald came to sit next to him, in full clown attire. "You here? What if this plane crashes? I’m going to die next to a clown," Ronald said.
ellauri133.html on line 450: “Bill? What is it?”
ellauri133.html on line 638: What's the Chinese word for happiness?
ellauri133.html on line 723: What´s the problem?
ellauri133.html on line 729: What are you talking about, HAL?
ellauri140.html on line 209: In the year after being driven from "his home", 1599, Spenser travelled to London, where he died at the age of forty-six – "for want of bread", according to Ben Jonson; one of Jonson's more doubtful statements, since Spenser had a payment to him authorised by the government and was due his pension (What the fuck, ei kaxitonnisella vuodessa vielä kuuhun mennä.)
ellauri140.html on line 912: What frayes ye, that were wont to comfort me affrayd? Mikä pelottaa sua, joka ennet sait rohkasta mua?
ellauri141.html on line 87: Agrippa : We? What did you do all day? Sleep?
ellauri141.html on line 311: Quid tibi vis, mulier nigris dignissima barris? What in the world! Why are you, a woman more meant
ellauri141.html on line 354: And by way of further warning, I’d better say up front that my reading of this poem differs radically from every other that I’ve seen. What follows is, I think, pretty well uncharted territory in the Persicos Odi canon. I’m going to try to make the case for and translate Pericos odi as a sex poem!
ellauri141.html on line 388: Heus puer, digitos ex anu. St Jerome modelled an uncompromising response to the pagan Horace, observing: "What harmony can there be between Christ and the Devil? What has Horace to do with the Psalter?" The first English translator Thomas Drant placed translations of Jeremiah and Horace side by side in Medicinable Morall, 1566. The Scot George Buchanan paraphrased the Psalms in a Horatian setting. John Keats echoed the opening of Horace's Epodes 14 in the opening lines of Ode to a Nightingale. Byron's famous lines from Childe Harold (Canto iv, 77) hit it on the nail:
ellauri141.html on line 541: intenta sunt quos porticus audiat What something mixed with something else
ellauri142.html on line 45:
What led Markku Graae to become a Freemason?
ellauri142.html on line 53: At the opening of the novel, Markku is a young man who has recently returned to Russia to seek a career after completing his education abroad. Although a well-meaning, kind hearted young man, he is awkward and out of place in the Russian high society in whose circles he starts to move. Markku, though intelligent, is not dominated by reason, as his friend Prince Andrei Nikolayevich Balkongsky is. His lack of direction leads him to fall in with a group of profligate young men like Anatole Kuragin and Dolokhov whose pranks and heavy drinking cause mild scandals. After a particularly outrageous escapade in which a policeman is strapped to the back of a bear and thrown into a river, Markku is sent away from St. Petersburg. What happened to the poor bear?
ellauri142.html on line 71: Count Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (/ˈtoʊlstɔɪ/; Russian: Лев Николаевич Толстой, 28 August 1828 – 7 November 1910), usually referred to in English as Leo Tolstoy, was a Russian writer who is regarded as one of the greatest authors of all time. He received nominations for the Nobel Prize in Literature every year from 1902 to 1906 and for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1901, 1902, and 1909. That he never won is a major controversy. Instead, Rudyard Kipling got the medal 1907. What the fuck?
ellauri142.html on line 176: Some say that Maha was taken from Hebrew, meaning, “What a boner.” Some say its origins are from the Sanskrit “Möhömaha,” meaning potbelly, or lord.
ellauri142.html on line 535: Joka ruumiista erotessaan ainoastaan Minua ajattelee, se saapuu ruumiinsa jätettyään Minun olemukseeni. Epäilemättä. No doubt. Mitä vitun nekrofiilejä nää oikein on. Parking meter violation. Viola oli Loppiaisaaton nuori nainen joka huuhtoutui rannalle ja kysyi pelastajiltansa: mikä maa mikä valuutta? What country, friends, is this? Norjalaissyntyiselle Annikalle meinas käydä kehnosti Saapin takaluukussa, vaan eipä käynytkään. Aum, sano, suloisuuden suloisuus. Aum mani padme, mene mene tekel ufarsin, stiiknafuulia. Näitä piisaa näitä taikasanoja. Eeli eeli laama sabakhtani, Expecto patronum. Voi hemmetti. Seesam aukene. Hokkus pokkus. Abrakadabra. Abrakapokus! Vampyyri muuttuu alapäästä lepakoxi. Uni hyvä verelle. Ei helvetti, ei jaxa.
ellauri143.html on line 61: The picture was also accompanied by a couplet from the first chapter of Thirukkural — “Katradhanaal aaya Payanen kol VaalaRivan natraal Thozhaaar enin,” which translates to — “What profit have those derived from learning, who worship not the good feet of him who is possessed of pure knowledge?”
ellauri143.html on line 63: The state BJP, it is alleged, has given a new inference to the couplet which has a religious overtone. The inference they provided goes like this — “What is the use of education when one who defies god and his believers?”
ellauri143.html on line 199: What choicer treasure doth the world contain.
ellauri143.html on line 326: What saves prosperity from swift decline?
ellauri143.html on line 451: What's the worth of shaven head or tresses long,
ellauri143.html on line 518: What his own soul has felt as bitter pain,
ellauri143.html on line 530: What is the work of virtue? 'Not to kill';
ellauri143.html on line 619: What powers so great as those of Destiny? Man's skill
ellauri143.html on line 1141: What then? The dragon breathes upon them, and they die.
ellauri144.html on line 427: Thomas came to be appreciated as a popular poet during his lifetime, though he found earning a living as a writer was difficult. He began augmenting his income with reading tours and radio broadcasts. His radio recordings for the BBC during the late 1940s brought him to the public´s attention, and he was frequently used by the BBC as an accessible voice of the literary scene. Thomas first travelled to the United States in the 1950s. His readings there brought him a degree of fame, while his erratic behaviour and drinking worsened. His time in the United States cemented his legend, however, and he went on to record to vinyl such works as A Child´s Christmas in Wales. Phil Rothin ekalla tyttöystävällä oll Dylan Thomas-levy, jota ne kuuntelivat pukilla. During his fourth trip to New York in 1953, Thomas became gravely ill and fell into a coma. He died on 9 November 1953 and his body was returned to Wales. On 25 November 1953, he was interred at St Martin´s churchyard in Laugharne. What a laugh.
ellauri144.html on line 723:
ellauri145.html on line 539: What rebellious teenager could resist this kind of thing? You’ve got your long hair, your leather jacket, your Slayer albums and your combat boots. You’ve got a guitar you can almost play. What completes that ensemble better than a copy of “The Antichrist,” placed conspicuously on your book stand? It’ll scare your parents if they’re religious, it’ll freak out your friends, and maybe you can find a sentence that sounds profound and memorize it so you can win some points for being deep. Get an inch or two deeper between her legs.
ellauri145.html on line 558: What are your thoughts on Nietzsche as a philosopher and a person?
ellauri145.html on line 560: What did Nietzsche mean, the woman must get the man come twice?
ellauri145.html on line 562: What are the biggest criticisms against Nietzsche?
ellauri145.html on line 572: What is the appeal of Nietzsche to you?
ellauri145.html on line 586: What were Nietzsche´s views on women?
ellauri146.html on line 348: 4 What the locust(I) swarm has left
ellauri146.html on line 542: Pour m’annoncer la mort ! — Ce qui sera, sera ! » Ilmoittamaan mulle kuolemastani! Whatever will be, will be!
ellauri147.html on line 161: Derrida is careful not to confine the will to power to human behavior, the mind, metaphysics, nor physical reality individually. It is the underlying life principle inaugurating all aspects of life and behavior, a self-preserving force. A sense of entropy and the eternal return, which are related, is always indissociable from the will to power. The eternal return of all memory initiated by the will to power is an entropic force again inherent to all life. What bladderdash.
ellauri147.html on line 316:
What Ended Their Marriage?
ellauri150.html on line 82: Rasismikeskustelun kannalta kyseenalaisin oli n-sanan lausumisen lisäksi kohta kaksi. Siinä Sannikka ihmetteli sitä, että ennen on pyritty eroon siitä, että ”meidät nähtäisiin ihonvärin, sukupuolen tai etnisyyden kautta”, mutta nyt yllättäen savunaamat kiinnittää siihen ize huomiota. What gives?
ellauri150.html on line 455: Quō vādis? (Classical Latin: [kʷoː ˈwaːdɪs], Ecclesiastical Latin: [kwo ˈvadis]) is a Latin phrase meaning "Where are you marching?". It is also commonly translated as "Where are you going?" or, poetically, "Whither goest thou?", or even "Whatsup doc? Munch munch"
ellauri150.html on line 461: Ben-Hurista ei meinannut ensin löytyä kuin filmikäsikirjoitus. Synopsis: Judah Ben-Hur lives as a rich Jewish merchant prince in Jerusalem at the beginning of the 1st century. Together with the new governor Pontius Pilate, his old friend Messiah arrives as commanding officer of the Roman legions. At first they are happy to meet after a long time but their different politic views separate them. During the welcome parade a roof tile falls down from Judah's house and injures the governor. Although Messiah knows they are not guilty as such, he sends Judah to the galleys and throws his mother and sister into prison. What the fuck, their house was a menace! Good old Hammurabi would have had their heads off. But Judah swears to come back and take revenge. Genre: Adventure, Drama, History.
ellauri150.html on line 488: What the f---!? Based on a 1880 novel after all!? Whose novel? Fuck you screenwriters! Taking all the glory! “I said,’ Well, I’ll never use the "g" word,'” Vidal says. “‘There’ll be nothing overt. But it will be perfectly clear that Messiah is in love with Ben-Hur.”
ellauri150.html on line 524: He heard again, or seemed to hear, the saying of the Nazarene, "I am the resurrection and the life." And as men repeat a question to grasp and fix the meaning, he asked, gazing at the figure on the hill fainting under its crown, What resurrection? and what life?
ellauri150.html on line 697: And now the Pope reminds us of a bit of ancient wisdom, "the wise man alone is free". This sounds like a saying from a fortune cookie. What does it mean? When we foolishly succumb to temptation and become slaves to our desires, we are no longer free! We have lost our self-control and have become possessed by our darkest passions. Jesus says, "Whosoever committeth sin is the slave of sin." (John 8:34)
ellauri150.html on line 744: Finally, I have a question for you. What do you think about the Eye of Providence in Christianity, can it be a graphic representation Holy Spirit? Today my mother noticed and asked me for it, I wonder what role has had Freemasonry in Catholic church.
ellauri151.html on line 89: What the fuck. All the trouble and here is the thanx. Eikö hyvä pastori pääse pukille? Huono tarina. Paskakirja. Pastorin teltta lyyhähtää, poika ruoskii sillä aikaa alas omaansa jossain munkkikammiossa. Huomaa että paha pastori oli protestantti.
ellauri151.html on line 138: Wilde took a key out of his pocket and showed me into a tiny apartment of two rooms… The youths followed him, each of them wrapped in a burnous that hid his face. Then the guide left us and Wilde sent me into the further room with little Mohammed and shut himself up in the other with the [other boy]. Every time since then that I have sought after pleasure, it is the memory of that night I have pursued. […] My joy was unbounded, and I cannot imagine it greater, even if love had been added. How should there have been any question of love? How should I have allowed desire to dispose of my heart? No scruple clouded my pleasure and no remorse followed it. But what name then am I to give the rapture I felt as I clasped in my naked arms that perfect little body, so wild, so ardent, so sombrely lascivious? For a long time after Mohammed had left me, I remained in a state of passionate jubilation, and though I had already achieved pleasure five times with him, I renewed my ecstasy again and again, and when I got back to my room in the hotel, I prolonged its echoes by hand until morning. What´s love got to do with it?
ellauri151.html on line 411: What Tarquin the Proud said in his garden with the poppy blooms was understood by the son but not by the messenger. Wot??? Kz. albumia 153.
ellauri151.html on line 450: What for others is style, for me is soul.
ellauri151.html on line 459: Mitä tää kaikki oikein meriteeraa? Mihin kirjailija on oikein tässä pyrkinyt? What's the meaning of all this?
ellauri151.html on line 526:
1. What are the general logic and the presuppositions of the problem of evil? 2. How can the problem of evil be called into question and how can one develop grammatical methods and philosophical tools to build a successful antitheodicy? 3. How can one develop a grammatical metacritique of the presuppositions of the problem through a philosophical grammar of the underlying language/world and being/meaning-links? 4. How can the grammatical approach to metaphysical questions and to the metacritique of the presuppositions of the problem of evil be used to analyse religious and worldview questions, and articulate ways of existential, humanistic and religious sense-making that overcome the problem?
ellauri151.html on line 613: Instead, give a description of symbols, or rather of signs. What we
ellauri151.html on line 656: Hamann takes basic intuitions to be practices like playing music and painting. He argues that Kantian forms of intuition like space and time are symbolic forms of sensuously mediated bodily practices. Fornication is another sensuously mediated bodily practice. What's its logical form? Hello my name is Potato Head! Let's play a game!
ellauri151.html on line 941: [9] What then? Are we Jews any better off? No, not at all; for I have already charged that all men, both Jews and Greeks, are under the power of sin,
ellauri152.html on line 613: “Miss Streisand [made] Yentl, whose greatest passion was the Torah, go on a ship to America, singing at the top of her lungs. Why would she decide to go to America? Weren’t there enough yeshivas in Poland or in Lithuania where she could continue to study? Was going to America Miss Streisand’s idea of a happy ending for Yentl? What would Yentl have done in America? Worked in a sweatshop 12 hours a day where there is no time for learning? Would she try to marry a salesman in New York, move to the Bronx or to Brooklyn and rent an apartment with an ice box and a dumbwaiter? This kitsch ending summarizes all the faults of the adaptation. It was done without any kinship to Yentl’s character, her ideals, her sacrifice, her great passion for spiritual achievement. As it is, the whole splashy production has nothing but a commercial value.”
ellauri153.html on line 491: same: “What can I rely on?” The problem of evil then builds on the practical problems of the
ellauri153.html on line 554: Now that the problem of evil has been exposed as a conceptual confusion, the way is clear for a Jamesian science of religions and worldviews. The methods of grammatical description can be extended to the practices and ways of sense-making in different worldviews: how they give meaning to moral practices and how do they approach the intelligibility of the world? What practical responses do they have for coping with evil? For example, the grammar of seeing-as for models and metaphors can be applied to the metaphors in the Hebrew Bible for God’s activity to understand what it is to see the world as God’s creation. The grammar of virtues can be used to describe Buddhist practices and explore, how these approaches contribute to the human good. Similar approaches can be taken to secular worldviews as well. These descriptions can then be used to assess the worldviews through dialogical encounters between them. However, one thing should be clear. There is no point in devaluing the world by arguing for the meaninglessness of life or atheism on the basis of evil, or in giving justifications for evils that can stand in the way of divine or human meliorist projects of fighting for justice. To paraphrase the judgment of the Divine Judge in the Book of Job, such approaches are not even wrong. They are as meaningless as life itself.
ellauri155.html on line 523: Little in the narrative tells us what we are to think of David’s actions. Perhaps the very fact that he sought security among the Philistines is enough to make his choice questionable. After all, God had shown Himself able to keep David safe within the boundaries of Israel (chs. 18–26), so David’s seeking refuge in Philistia may indicate a lapse of faith. It could be that David’s raids from Ziklag confirm this. We see how David would go out against enemies of Israel such as the Amalekites (see Ex. 17:8–16) who were in the south of Judah. After defeating them, he would bring spoil back to Achish and lie to the king, telling him that he was conducting raids on the Israelites (1 Sam. 27:8–12). We do not want to make too much of this, for some actions are acceptable in times of war that are not necessarily acceptable in times of peace (for example, industrial espionage). This was a time of war, with both Achish and the peoples David raided being actual enemies of Israel. Still, David’s successful deception put him in a quandary. Achish was so pleased with David’s work that he commissioned David to join him against Israel (28:1–2). What would he do?
ellauri155.html on line 795: What was Calvin’s answer? He reminds his readers what the predestinated are predestined to do! He points out what the Apostle Paul said in Ephesians 1:4, where he reminds us that the end for which we are elected is “that we should be holy, and without blame before him.” “If the end of election is holiness of life, it ought to arouse and stimulate us strenuously to aspire to it, instead of serving as a pretext for sloth.” He develops how predestination should lead us to fear God all the more, and consequently should both comfort us and spur us on even in the worst of times to greater holiness.
ellauri155.html on line 930: What in the body´s tomb doth buried lie Mikä makaa haudattuna ruumiin mausoleumissa
ellauri156.html on line 45: But here is the spoiler: What David's story tells us is that it is OK to be as awful and nasty a person privately as you could ever wish to be, as long as you end up as the overall winner of the cup. Winners can do nothing seriously wrong, because the victory at the end is the crucial thing. In terms of good old game theory: a virtuous life is no game of attrition, where every mistake counts and your deeds are toted up at the end. No, it is a winner takes all, you either win or lose at the end, whatever happens in subgames on the way is just wiped away. This applies to Dog himself, as Lauri Snellman with his nifty jesuitical game-theoretical theodicy argument has shown.
ellauri156.html on line 98: Joab urges David not to number the Israelites, and through the prophet Egad, God rebukes David for doing so, giving him a choice of one of three chastenings. It is a grave sin with great consequences for the nation Israel. Out of this sin, God brings about blessing for Israel, because it is on the plot of ground where David offers sacrifices to God that the temple will be built. What chastenings?
ellauri156.html on line 108: What I am pointing out here is that the decision on David's part -- to remain in Jerusalem -- is the beginning of woes for both David and the nation Israel. Why is it wrong for David to stay home while the rest of the men of Israel go to war against the Ammonites? First, leading the nation in war is one of the main tasks of the king:
ellauri156.html on line 120: What the fuck? Jesus was a wimp par excellence, so precisely by NOT taking part in a war David was a perfect role model for this pacifist.
ellauri156.html on line 122: What keeps David home in Jerusalem? Why doesn’t David go to the battle? I fear there are perhaps several reasons. The first is David's arrogance. God has been with David in all of his military encounters and given him victory over all his foes. God has given David a great name. David has begun to believe his own press clippings. He begins to feel he is invincible. David seems to have come to the place where he believes his abilities are so great he can lead Israel into victory, even though he is not with his men in battle. He was just getting bored. God should not have helped him TOO much, that was like taking the wind from his sails. Any parent knows that much.
ellauri156.html on line 269: I am not suggesting that David purposed to see something he should not. (I bet he did, peeping Tom. You actually come round to the same conclusion below, Bob.) More than likely he is walking about, almost absent-mindedly, when suddenly his eyes fix on something that rivets his attention on a woman bathing herself. The text does not really tell us where this woman is bathing, and why at this time of the night? We only know that she is within sight of David's penthouse (rooftop). David notes her beauty. He does not know who she is or whether she is married. We cannot be certain how much David sees, and thus we do not know for certain whether he has yet sinned. (What the fuck? How much do you need to see to sin? Are boobs enough, or do you need to see the pudendum or the fanny?) If David saw more of this woman than he should (a fact still in question), then he surely should have diverted his eyes. It was not necessarily evil for him to discretely inquire about her. If she were unmarried and eligible, he could have taken her for his wife. His inquiry would make this clear.
ellauri156.html on line 291: What the fuck again, Hittites were to Jews like the Brits, an old empire from the time of Gideon. What is there to laugh about, is it like middle class Americans laughing at Brits as upperclass twits?
ellauri156.html on line 406:
Plan A: Enable Uriah To Do What Comes Naturally.
ellauri156.html on line 469: Uriah leaves David's presence. Now David adds a further touch. He sends a “present from the king” after, or with, Uriah. How we would love to know just what that “gift” was. Was it a night for two at the Jerusalem Hilton? Was it dinner and dancing at a romantic restaurant? I think we can safely say this: (1) We are not told what the present was. (2) We are not supposed to know, or it would not add to the story for us to know what it was. (3) Whatever it was, it was very carefully planned to facilitate David's scheme of getting Uriah to bed with his wife, as quickly as possible.
ellauri156.html on line 499:
Plan C: Get Uriah to Do Drunk What He Will Not Do Sober (11:12-13)
ellauri156.html on line 537: Abner was the son of the witch of En-dor in Mordor, (Pirḳe R. El. xxxiii.), and the hero par excellence in the Haggadah (Yalḳ., Jer. 285; Eccl. R. on ix. 11; Ḳid. 49b). Conscious of his extraordinary strength, he exclaimed: "If I could only catch hold of the earth, I could shake it" (Yalḳ. l.c.)—a saying which parallels the famous utterance of Archimedes, "Had I a fulcrum, I could move the world." (Dote moi pa bo kai tan gan kino.) According to the Midrash (Eccl. R. l.c.) it would have been easier to move a wall six yards thick than one of the feet of Abner, who could hold the Israelitish army between his knees, and often did. Yet when his time came [date missing], Joab smote him. But even in his dying hour, Abner seized his foe's balls like a ball of thread, threatening to crush them. Then the Israelites came and pleaded for Joab's jewels, saying: "If thou crushest them his future kids shall be orphaned, and our women and all our belongings will become a prey to the Philistines." Abner answered: "What can I do? He has extinguished my light" (has wounded me fatally). The Israelites replied: "Entrust thy cause to the true judge [God]." Then Abner released his hold upon Joab's balls and fell dead to the ground (Yalḳ. l.c.).
ellauri156.html on line 625: A couple hundred years ago, my wife Jeannette and I went to England and Scotland with my parents. Each night we stayed at a “bed and breakfast” as we drove through Wales. There were a number of farms, but not so many towns in which to find a place to stay for the night. We saw a “bed and breakfast” sign and traveled along the country road until we found the place -- a very quaint farm. We saw several hundred sheep in a pasture, a stone trestle, and stone barns. It looked like the perfect place, and in many ways it was. What we did not realize was that the stone trestle was a railroad trestle for a train that came by late at night, a few feet from the house where we slept. Two cows also calved that night. I have spent my share of time around farms, but I have never heard the bellow of a cow that was calving echo throughout a stone barn. I could hardly sleep a wink. Just goes to show. Never trust the Rugby guys.
ellauri156.html on line 645: When Bathsheba's mourning is complete, David sends for her and brings her to himself as his wife. Wait, was little David born as yet, or did he start fucking her with her belly full? I do not see him bending down on his knees, proposing. I do not see him courting her, sending her roses. I see him “taking” her once again. And again. In fact, this is my favourite part. The question in my mind is, “Why?” Why does David take Bathsheba into his house as one of his wives? I do not think he is any longer trying to “cover up” his sin; it is far too late for that. She must be “showing” her pregnancy by now, and it is hard to imagine how all Israel cannot know what has been going on. It appears that at this point, David is not trying to conceal his sin, but to legitimize it. Whatever David's reasons may be, they are hardly spiritual, and they are most certainly self-serving.
ellauri156.html on line 689: As I understand the Bible, there is more to the story than this, however. Our lord (meaning Jeshua) frequently told stories. Why was this? Was it because he was trying to “put the cookies on the lowest shelf”? Was he accommodating his teaching to those who might have difficulty understanding it? Sometimes our lord told stories to the religious experts, who should have been able to follow a more technical argument. No, I think his own elevator did not quite reach the upper floors. I am thinking in particular of the story of the Good Samaritan, as recorded in Luke 10. A religious lawyer stood up and asked Jesus a question, not to sincerely learn, but with the hope of making our Lord look bad before the people. He asked, “What shall I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus turned the question around. This man was the expert in the Law of Moses, what did it teach? The man answered, “YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR STRENGTH, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND; AND YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF, THAT IS, EVEN MORE.” (Luke 10:27). In effect, Jesus responded, “Right. Now do it.” That was the problem with the law, no one could do it without failing, and so no one could earn their way to heaven by good works. Well, how high can we get with mediocre works? Someplace between heaven and hell would actually be most preferable.
ellauri156.html on line 782: (4) David's sin was not intended as an excuse for us to sin, but as a warning to all of us how capable we are of sin. I have heard it said more times than I wish to recall, “Well, even David sinned. . . .” What they mean is, “How can you expect me not to sin? If David, as spiritual as he was, sinned as he did, then how can you expect me to do any better?” Fair enough. But Where these guys go wrong is that they are not Gawds petlambs, no preferential treatment is in the offing for them. Gawd will cross them like cockroaches. Or leece.
ellauri156.html on line 816: He bore ours sins on the cross! And by trusting in His death, burial, and resurrection, we die to sin (or sin to die, pick your choice, like David from Nathan's deck of bottom cards) and are raised to novelty products of eternal life, in Christ. The Gospel must first bring us to a recognition of the magnitude of our sin, and of our guilt, and then it takes us to the magnitude of God's grace in Jesus Christ, by which our sins can be forgiven. Have you come to see how great your sins are before a holy God? Then I urge you to experience how great a salvation is yours, brought about by this same God, through the death, burial, and resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ. What a Relief! Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a relief it is.
ellauri158.html on line 53: What Clarke argues is that the Newtonian natural system and the findings that stem from it are incompatible with the “blind necessity” that characterizes both the Epicurean and Spinozistic world picture, precisely because this system implies the existence of an immaterial and wise Creator. What the fuck? It is a deterministic system par excellence. Ach, tarkoitatte alkuehtoja. Vanha antroposentrinen jumalatodistus: jos jumala ei olis säätänyt kaikkea näin hyvin, ei olis meitäkään. Tää ei voi olla sattumaa! Maailmamme ei voi olla 1 ziljoonasta sokeasta yrityxestä! Vai voiko se? This lottery is unfair, huutaa Shirley Jackson kiukkuisena, kun kivet lentävät. Shirley putkahti esille albumissa 133 ja putkahtaa uudelleen esille albumissa 270.
ellauri159.html on line 765: Donovan argues that understanding the dynamics of these ancient honor groups is the key to understanding the essence of male psychology and how men relate to, interact, and judge each other even up through the modern day. What men respect in other men (and women find attractive), is rooted in what men wanted in the men to the left and the right of them as they stood together side-by-side on the perimeter.
ellauri160.html on line 381: Pekka soitteli minulle tuona keväänä aika usein, yöllä, juttelimme ihan tavallisia asioita, ja minä törppö en tajunnut että ne olivat 'äänettömiä avunhuutoja', ja se taakka kulkee mukanani loppuun asti, mutta olin itsekin siinä vaiheessa niin ulkona, ja samalla tavalla kun kaikki luukut oli lyöty kiinni, harkitsin samanlaista ratkaisua. Whatever, Gummerus ja sen johto murhasivat Pekan ja samalla vaikeni moni muukin kirjailija loppuiäkseen, se oli karmea ja kylmäverinen operaatio, yksi pahimmista suomalaisen kustannusmaailman historiassa. – Minulla on satoja muistoja Pekasta, kirjoitan jos jaksan joskus… jos minulla sen aikaisessa kirjailijakunnassa joitan kamuja oli niin Pekka ja Sirkka Turkka, ja Veijo Meri joka aina oli W+G:n ja Gummeruksen Katajanokan kasinon syyskauden avauksen jatkoilla Pekan ja Eijan himassa. – Viimeiseltä kerralta muistan Matti Pulkkisen joka oli ulkona oven suussa tupakalla ja tokaisi: "sitä ollaan sitten samassa tehtaassa töissä"… niinpä oltiin hetki…
ellauri160.html on line 654: “What, actually, is magic? It is man’s belief in his ability, by taking active measures, to control his fate and in a certain sense this circumvents God. It doesn’t contradict faith but it does help God to help me. That’s why I love it, because it’s very human, especially in an era that is scientific.
ellauri161.html on line 499: What works for "Don't Look Up" is the cast, as it has a handful of great names on the list, with the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio, Jennifer Lawrence, Meryl Streep, Cate Blanchett, and so forth. Mitä enemmän julkkixia, sen parempi leffa. On kiva bongata tuttuja naamoja. Ne on kuin perhettä.
ellauri161.html on line 507: Over 30% of the American population does not believe in global warming and think it is a hoax, or fake news. What's more perilous though is the fact that governments worldwide are NOT taking the proposed measures that could curb global warming beneath 1.5 Celsius. Above that treshold of 1.5 degrees Celsius we get a runaway effect of increasing global warming, which would be nothing less than CATASTROPHIC.
ellauri161.html on line 529: So what exactly is wrong with McKay's picture of the "robber barons" aligning with the right? Well it's anachronistic. Today it's the left who are in power and it appears that Big Tech is in lock step with them. What's more the left can no longer be said to be sticking up for the "little guy," as they have granted a monopoly to pharmaceutical companies in their promotion of vaccines.
ellauri161.html on line 549: So yes, this means that even the supporting characters in subplots get a C storyline. See the problem yet? (No. What is it? Everybody's got a C story line in life, so what?)
ellauri161.html on line 555: But one gets a flawed but entirely worthwhile viewing experience. Enough time too to get thru all the popcorns. What's on next?
ellauri161.html on line 671: For the majority of the film (not Talladega, the new one), we’re bouncing from one republican caricature to the next. Streep is a female version of Donald Trump. Jonah Hill is a fratty version of Donald Trump Jr. Mark Rylance is a right-wing version of Tim Cook. (What a joke, he's way too poor.) And Ron Perlman is a red-eyed version of General Turgidson. When General Turgidson wonders aloud what kind of name "Strangelove" is, saying to Mr. Staines (Jack Creley) that it is not a "Kraut name", Staines responds that Strangelove's original German surname was Merkwürdigliebe ("Strange love" in German) and that "he changed it when he became a citizen". A kike anyway, by the name.
ellauri161.html on line 746: What a piece of sh**t. complete waist of time. It's a shame that with such great cast they couldn't do an even decent movoe.
ellauri161.html on line 1135: The older priest from Torcy talks to his younger colleague about his poor diet and lack of prayer, but the younger man seems unable to make changes. After his health worsens, the young priest goes to the city of Lille to visit a doctor, who diagnoses him with stomach cancer. The priest goes for refuge to a former colleague, who has lapsed and now works as an apothecary, while living with a woman outside wedlock. The priest dies in the house of his colleague after being absolved by him. His dying words are "What does it matter? All is Grace".
ellauri161.html on line 1137: So what was the point? I say as disappointedly as the Korean ladies listening to a reading of Goethe's Werther's Leiden. What? He shot himself? So he never got to shag the woman of his heart? What a drag. And threw the rookie historian out on her ear.
ellauri162.html on line 786: Molinism, named after 16th-century Spanish Jesuit priest and Roman Catholic theologian Luis de Molina, is the thesis that God has only middling knowledge of what is going on. It seeks to reconcile the apparent tension of divine providence and human free will. Prominent contemporary Molinists include William Lane Craig, Alfred Freddoso, Thomas Flint, Kenneth Keathley, and Louis Armstrong. What a wonderful world. Johnin mieliviini oli juuri Mölinä.
ellauri163.html on line 347: Guest Aug 12 ´06#1: What does this verse mean?
ellauri163.html on line 829: There is also a scene where Mouchette is wet, working in the bar, and then gets some coins as payment. Later, in his hut, she is wet, and Arsene pays her some coins to go along with his story regarding Mathieu’s presumed death. What this does is not only link divergent scenes in a strictly visual and cinematic way, but it emphasises the elliptical and cyclical nature of the film, where recurring images and motifs abound. Yet, all of them are slightly askew, and the camera always seems to look at its lead character’s life slightly askance, as if it was somehow recapitulating the clearly warped view of life Mouchette owns.
ellauri163.html on line 887: What essential difference is there between an assembly of Christians celebrating the principal dates in the life of Christ, or of Jews remembering the exodus from Egypt or the promulgation of the Decalogue, and a reunion of citizens commemorating the promulgation of a new moral or legal system or some great event in the national life? (1954, p. 427). Two men say they´re Jesus, one of them must be wrong.
ellauri164.html on line 223: How blue can you get? The answer is right here in my heart, wailed BB King. How stupid can you get? The answer can be found in Quora. - What is the dark side of top happiest countries? - That their taxes are so high. How can anybody be this stupid? The answer is right there in their walnut size brains.
ellauri164.html on line 379: I wanted to like this book so much more than I did. I actually found it incredibly difficult to understand. Some of it, I think, was that it was poorly translated. I read a 1962 edition that doesn't even cite a translator -- so many of the sentences were so convoluted as to be utterly obtuse. Poor translation or witless reader? I never could figure out why Mlle Chantal was such an angry bitch and why she insisted on tormenting the priest. What was her secret? Was the priest an alcoholic or just terminally sick? Gay? Why did M le Comte come to hate the priest? These are just some of the basic narrative issues I couldn't figure out. Forget the whole spiritual aspect--much of what the priest mused on and felt was incomprehensible to me as he described it. I can't help wondering if I'd have understood it if I had read it in French. Or maybe I'm just so spiritually challenged (in a God believing, Catholic way) that I can't comprehend it when it's described. All of that said, there were profoundly moving passages here and there, but over all I don't begin to know what I read. It's rather embarrassing actually--I feel so simple! (less)
ellauri164.html on line 386: What makes the saga so compelling is the gentle, uncomplaining way the new priest relates his many failures and humiliations. As his audience we see his kindnesses misunderstood and his simple mistakes turned against him. And yet he is determined to go out and visit all within his parish despite mounting health problems. But does he really like anybody? Except the motorbike chap perhaps.
ellauri164.html on line 433: What the fuck. It all goes to show: meitä on moneen junaan. Takapiässä etupiässä. Onko Mikkeliin mänijöitä? Juna män justiisa. Terviisiä Mikkelistä, käskivät vetää kikkelistä.
ellauri164.html on line 500: Moses needed time to grow and mature and learn to be meek and eat humble pie before God, and this brings us to the next chapter in Moses’ life, his 40 years in the land of Midian. During this time, Moses learned the simple life of a shepherd, a husband, and a father. God took an impulsive and hot-tempered young man and began the process of molding and shaping him into the perfect instrument for God to use. What can we learn from this time in his life? If the first lesson is to wait on God’s timing, the second lesson is to not be idle while we wait on God’s timing. While the Bible doesn’t spend a lot of time on the details of this part of Moses’ life, it’s not as if Moses were sitting idly by waiting for God’s call. He spent the better part of 40 years learning the ways of a shepherd and supporting and raising a family. These are not trivial things! While we might long for the “mountain top” experiences with God, 99 percent of our lives is lived in the valley doing the mundane, day-to-day things that make up a life. We need to be living for God “in the valley” before He will enlist us into the battle. It is often in the seemingly trivial things of life that God trains and prepares us for His call in the next season.
ellauri164.html on line 516:
What Was Moses’ Sin?
ellauri164.html on line 540: Whatever the reason for the drastic punishment, behold what grumbling does. It fuels discontent and bitterness. Be careful, fellow Christians; we can all succumb to the temptation to draw others into our anger, doubts, dissatisfaction, and fears. After all, misery loves company. Sharing concerns with friends is good and necessary, but this must be tempered by the knowledge that too much can harm them and us. A steady diet of grumbling is not good for anyone.
ellauri164.html on line 545:
Cross-posted at the Catholic Standard: What Was Moses’ Sin?
ellauri164.html on line 564: They angrily inquired, "Why have ye brought up the congregation of the Lord into this wilderness, that we and our cattle should die there? And wherefore have ye made us to come up out of Egypt, to bring us in unto this evil place? it is no place of seed, or of figs, or of vines, or of pomegranates; neither is there any water to drink. What the fuck, you call this a promised land?
ellauri164.html on line 597: Honoring God in leadership—as all Christian leaders in every sphere must attempt to do—is a terrifying responsibility. Whether we lead a business, a classroom, a relief organization, a household, or any other organization, we must be careful not to mistake our authority for God’s. What can we do to keep ourselves in obedience to God? Meeting regularly with an accountability (or “peer”) group, praying daily about the tasks of leadership, keeping a weekly Sabbath to rest in God’s presence, and seeking others’ perspective on God’s guidance are methods some leaders employ. Even so, the task of leading firmly while remaining wholly dependent on God is beyond human capability. If the most humble man on the face of the earth (Num. 12:3) could fail in this way, so can we. By God’s grace, even failures as great as Moses’ at Meribah, with disastrous consequences in this life, do not separate us from the ultimate fulfillment of God’s promises. Moses did not enter the Promised Land, yet the New Testament declares him “faithful in all God’s house” and reminds us of the confidence that all in God’s house have in the fulfillment of our redemption in Christ (Heb. 3:2-6).
ellauri164.html on line 661: What is Sin?
ellauri164.html on line 667: Moses messed up. He did something which resulted in God banning him from the Promised Land. What did he do to warrant such a punishment?
ellauri164.html on line 676: What did God say Moses’s sin was?
ellauri164.html on line 682: What did Moses have to say about his failure?
ellauri164.html on line 709: He has reached the end of his rope. He has been patient with these complaining and rebellious people, but he couldn’t take it any longer. Their constant ingratitude and rebelliousness caused Moses to lose faith in the people. This is the people that were supposed to be God’s treasured possession, a holy nation of priests who had agreed to be in a covenant relationship with God (Ex 19:5-8). What a disappointment they had turned out to be and Moses was finished interceding for them. God knew Moses was not going to intercede for the people at Meribah, therefore He doesn’t ordain punishment for them.
ellauri164.html on line 723: Question: Please tell me what exactly is "Moses' sin." I thought it was the killing of the Egyptian when he was younger. Or was it the revolt of the Levi tribe toward the end? What reason kept him out of the Promised Land?
ellauri164.html on line 806: Note that the Bible says (vs. 8) that Moses is to take “the” staff. By that God means the staff of Aaron, the High Priest. What do we know about this staff?
ellauri164.html on line 833: What’s the problem?
ellauri164.html on line 835: What God commanded: What did God command?
ellauri164.html on line 863:
ellauri164.html on line 933: Did Moses realize immediately what he had done? At some point after this event, “the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron, ‘Because you did not believe Me, to hallow Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land which I have given them.’” Their conduct had publicly displayed a lack faith, reverence and respect. God determined that this needed an equally public punishment. The punishment for this sin was grievous. God gave to them a punishment so similar to the one given to all Israel at Kadesh that it was a heart-breaking moment for Moses. Both he and Aaron would die in the wilderness and not be allowed to enter the promised land. What a bitter pill for Moses to swallow. Like David with Bathsheba, God forgave the sin, but did not remove the consequences. The consequences for Moses’ momentary lapse in reverence and respect under the terrible emotion of anger was to be barred from entrance into the promised land.
ellauri164.html on line 979: What God wants the people to see is that Moses speaks in performing the miracle at the rock. It is a potentially powerful transitional moment in which Moses’s publicly perceived action would be speech. What he would say would become part of the people’s religious consciousness—part of the repeated narrative of the people—a way of adducing to God a caring relationship with God’s people, and conveying that care to the people. We can imagine the speech Moses might give, performing the quintessential task of a prophet, in bringing God and the people closer together. Instead, he calls them “rebels,” distancing the people from himself and, by association, from God; disdaining their legitimate needs; and losing the opportunity to attribute the provision of water to God.
ellauri171.html on line 391: What’s the story really about? At the time the story of Cain and Abel developed, there was constant friction between farmers and herdsmen, both of them fighting for the limited resources of the land. Cain kills Abel. A herd of goats in a stony, barren landscape The herdsmen were angry when the farmers took over the best land for their crops the farmers were angry when the flocks trampled their crops.This friction leads to violence in which people get killed. Notice that the story was developed by the herdsmen, the keepers of flocks. This explains why Abel, the herdsman, is portrayed as the injured party. Lucky Luke-tarinassa Piikkilankoja preerialla skooparit repi pelihousunsa kun jyväjemmarit pystyttivät piikkilankoja preerialle. Sillä kertaa oli maajussit hyvixiä. Nyt on keskusta taas paha.
ellauri171.html on line 500:
Whatever happened to Dinah?
ellauri171.html on line 515: What happened to Dinah? "ithout giving any details of where she was or how it happened, the Bible simply says that Shechem, the son of the local ruler, took hold of her and and had sexual intercourse with her by force. There was seeing, desiring and taking just as there was with the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden, where the pattern for sin had begun, tai vaikka jossain jäzkibaarissa.
ellauri171.html on line 579: has she been there all the time? has the marriage already happened? What the fuck? The Bible leaves these questions unanswered.
ellauri171.html on line 597: Confusing pic. What gives? Ah, this is not Jacob's bad boys revenging on the skinned guys but rather the motivating scene, naughty foreigner kidnapping Dinah, giving cause to the subsequent genocide. Figures. Dinah looks a little heavy for Shechem. ellauri171.html on line 687: A fifth lesson is that the account describes what happens when men and women abandon God. Sex and other immoral behavior replace God! The entire story is an example of unrestrained animal lust and human depravity. Total disregard for life occurs. What one desires is all that is important. As Proverbs 30:15 says, “The leech has two daughters, “Give,” “Give” . . . ” Women are less important than men. Men abuse men. Unloving men abusively rule over women. Sex trumps everything else. Why? Judges 21:25 says, “. . . everyone did what was right in his own eyes.”
ellauri171.html on line 695: Our eighth lesson reveals the twelve tribes were becoming more like the Canaanites, which were given to sexual perversion: homosexuality, rape, adultery, murder, lies, abuse of women, abduction, absence of justice and the defense of the guilty. What sins did we miss? In truth these are sufficient to demonstrate the utter moral decline of the twelve tribes and one tribe that was worse than the others.
ellauri171.html on line 799: Until that day, God is continually searching the hearts of His people to know what is in them. He allows some Christians to be poor, even while other believers have wealth. What a Christian does in each circumstance is important to God. In the book of Revelation, the glorified Jesus Christ said to one of His churches, "I know your… poverty, but you are rich” (Revelation 2:9). That is, these Christians were poor in the wealth of this world, but were rich in faith toward God.
ellauri171.html on line 979: What the fuck so she stuck to her own people's gods, that was her biggest sin. Besides being smarter than her rather goofy hubby Ahab.
ellauri171.html on line 1055: Ostensibly, Tamar is only waiting for Shelah to grow up and mate with her. But after time passes, she realizes that Judah is not going to effect that union. She therefore devises a plan to secure her own future by tricking her father-in-law into having sex with her. She is not planning incest. A father-in-law may not sleep with his daughter-in-law (Lev 18:15), just as a brother-in-law may not sleep with his sister-in-law (Lev 18:16), but in-law incest rules are suspended for the purpose of the levirate. The levir is, after all, only a surrogate for the dead husband. What the fuck. Well, it takes one to know one.
ellauri172.html on line 285: 26 Then the angel of the Lord moved on ahead and stood in a narrow place where there was no room to turn, either to the right or to the left. 27 When the donkey saw the angel of the Lord, it lay down under Balaam, and he was angry(E) and beat it with his staff. 28 Then the Lord opened the donkey’s mouth,(F) and it said to Balaam, “What have I done to you to make you beat me these three times?(G)”
ellauri180.html on line 254: What do you do if you discover another recently published book that has nearly the exact same premise as the one you've written?
ellauri180.html on line 328: What are the high school stereotypes?
ellauri181.html on line 384: What idiots! And these monkeys test the rest? Yep!
ellauri181.html on line 541:
Ethics, Virtues, and Values: Knowing What Matters Most
ellauri182.html on line 200: What is a word for name-calling? In this page you can discover 11 synonyms, antonyms, idiomatic expressions, and related words for name-calling, like: mad-quite, abusing, Oooooooooh, insult, names, foul-language, insulting, rudeness, bad-language, derogating and white-slavery.
ellauri182.html on line 421: What is inside is outside; what is outside is inside.
ellauri182.html on line 427: Now step back and take a look at the paper in its entirety. What do you see?
ellauri182.html on line 429: What you will inevitably notice is the circle. After all, it is the only thing to actually see.
ellauri182.html on line 437: What is inside and what is outside is the same. Plain white paper. The circle - the idea of separation - is an illusion. The circle, which creates the duality of 'inside' and 'outside' or 'here' and 'there' is a false representation. The cycle of 'life' and 'death' that the circle shows is itself nothing more than a trick of the conscious mind that habitually creates opposites where none in fact exist. You're actually dead already.
ellauri182.html on line 443: What is inside is outside; what is outside is inside. Think about a Möbius strip, or a Klein bottle. No way for a fart to stay inside. As within, so without. This ancient wisdom is as applicable today as it was centuries ago. Make a positive change within yourself and see that positivity reflected back at you by the people around you and the circumstances you find yourself in.
ellauri183.html on line 268: What the hell was that? Awful on almost every level. Unless post apocalyptic dystopian tales of bestiality float your boat. I'm guessing there was an allegorical message in there somewhere. Not for me. (less)
ellauri183.html on line 289: Ms Elliott replied: 'What I was talking about was the upholding of international law which your own minister talked about a few minutes ago and the right of upholding international law is as relevant in Ukraine as it is in Palestine.'
ellauri183.html on line 298: I've seen some images and gifs on r/imgoingtohellforthis and what not showing Jews as miserly people. What's all this about?
ellauri184.html on line 355: First, the problem is theological: The apostle Paul clearly marks the beginning of sodomy with the practical theological problem of idolatry. “although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts...” (Rom. 1:21 ). What was the result? “For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged their natural use for what is against nature. LIkewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due” (Rom. 1:26-27 ). In short, a skewed vision of God leads directly to a skewed vision of man and human sexuality.
ellauri184.html on line 640: We do not know whether Jesus routinely called himself the Messiah, Son of Man, or King of the Jews (though the evangelists sure make it appear so). Nevertheless, these logos were ascribed to him, and he did not sufficiently distance himself from them. Even worse, he presented himself as an outsider by caring for outcasts and thus broke social taboos. What is more, through healings, exorcisms, and commensality with the disdained, he deliberately distanced himself from societal norms, added to his image as an outsider in a performative way, and thereby metaphorically conveyed a message that his opponents understood very well.
ellauri184.html on line 646: Jesus was crucified between two other “robbers”. The original Greek texts speak of lestai (Mt, Mk). Lestes is the Greek translation of the Latin latro. Both terms have a similarly broad semantic meaning. What is important in our context is that latro and lestes denote not only a street robber but also a resistance- and guerilla fighter. It is likely that no one perceived Jesus as a guerilla fighter, but the term lestes is even broader than the English terms robber, bandit, or resistance fighter, it includes terrorist.
ellauri185.html on line 95: What about the destruction of Tyre? Well, Nebuchadnezzer’s attack came shortly after Ezekiel, so it’s hard to tell for sure from our perspective whether or not Ezekiel truly prophesied that phase of Tyre’s destruction. But as far as Alexander is concerned, it is well established that this took place in 322 BC. So this is a clear example of the Bible foretelling an event (actually several) in detail.
ellauri185.html on line 504: Niinpä. What else is new?
ellauri185.html on line 540: Mistä johtuu esim. köyhyys ja kurjuus, jotka ovat kaikkien muitten epäkohtien pohjasyynä? Köyhät teillä on aina keskuudessanne, ennusti Jeesus Kristus hyväntuoxuvat jalat Magdalenan sylissä. - Ilmeisesti siitä, että muutamat omistavat tämän maailman hyvyyttä enemmän, toiset vähemmän, kolmannet ei ehkä juuri mitään. Mitenkä tämä on mahdollista? Se johtuu niin sanotusta omistusoikeudesta. Mutta tämä luuloteltu oikeus ei Tolstoin mielestä ole mikään oikeus, vaan se perustuu ilmeiseen väkivaltaan, jota ei mitenkään voida puolustaa (Auf ruf an die Menschheit. S. 21). Whats the diff? Oikeus on aina vahvemman oikeus, joten mikä tässä maxaa?
ellauri185.html on line 759: What is Passover angel of death?
ellauri185.html on line 761: What was the plague that killed the firstborn of Egypt?
ellauri185.html on line 765: What were the 7 plagues in Egypt?
ellauri185.html on line 767: What does the Bible say about firstborns?
ellauri185.html on line 769: What angel takes you to heaven?
ellauri185.html on line 773: What does the Bible say about plagues?
ellauri185.html on line 785:
What was the plague that killed the firstborn of Egypt?
ellauri188.html on line 132: old people, green from long drinking of kava-worth- less wretches in a huddle of huts on the shore. What I did see was an enormous valley, over a mile wide
ellauri188.html on line 429: HIV/AIDS prevention would have been particularly important to him. He's NOT gay or Jewish NOR is the restaurant owner "Tucker" oriental, though he looks like it. He is half Irish, quarter Polish and quarter Italian. What a bummer.
ellauri189.html on line 79: In 1825 Antoni Malczewski published a long poem, Maria (Marya: A Tale of the Ukraine), which constitutes his only contribution to Polish poetry but occupies a permanent place there as a widely imitated example of the so-called Polish-Ukrainian poetic school. In the poem, Wacław, a young husband, goes to fight the Tatars and, after routing the raiders, hurries home to his wife, Maria. All he finds is a cold corpse. Yeah, great. Oh fuck. What's the use. The poem makes use of diversified rhythms and carefully chosen rhymes; and its Byronic hero, as well as its picture of Ukraine as a land of sombre charm, assured Malczewski both popularity and critical applause.
ellauri189.html on line 803: What’s special about the Pashtuns is that although Pashtuns do not keep Judaism today (except for some small portions like not eating some non-kosher animals), according to Pashtuns’ tradition, they did not mix. And unlike other nations who have the tradition of being descendants of Bene Israel, the face of the Pashtuns prove they did not mix.
ellauri192.html on line 47: Trubetzkoy was born into privilege. His father, Sergei Nikolaevich Trubetskoy, came from a Lithuanian Gediminid princely family. In 1908, he enrolled at the Moscow University. While spending some time at the University of Leipzig, Trubetzkoy was taught by August Leskien, a pioneer of research into sound laws. What a privilege!
ellauri192.html on line 289: What sharper disservice can be rendered to literature than to consecrate the mediocre and the ephemeral? How about giving the prize to political suspects?
ellauri192.html on line 301: 2014 also marked the release of Tokarczuk’s most ambitious work, “The Books of Jacob,” the novel that set off much of the rancor directed at her by Polish nationalists. The book, which has yet to appear in English, is centered on the historical figure of Jakub Frank, a Jewish-born 18th-century religious leader. Frank, believed to have been born with the name Jakub Leibowicz, oversaw a messianic sect that incorporated significant portions of Christian practice into Judaism; he led mass baptisms of his followers. As Ruth Franklin reported in a New Yorker profile this past summer, Tokarczuk spent almost a decade researching Frank and the Poland in which he lived. The result is a book that, by the account of those who have read it, delivers a picture of the many intricate and unpredictable ways in which the story of Poland is tied to the story of its Jews. “There’s no Polish culture without Jewish culture,” Tokarczuk told Franklin. What else is new, asks Isaac Singer. Tokarczuk is not a Jewess, Tokarczuk considers herself a disciple of Carl Jung and cites his psychology as an inspiration for her literary work.
ellauri192.html on line 351: The last American winner was Toni Morrison in 1993. No writer from South America has won since Gabriel Garcia Marquez in 1982. The previous North American winner was Canadian Saul Bellow, who won in 1976 and was a resident of the United States for much of his life. What the fuck he was a Chicago crook, as American as apple pie.
ellauri192.html on line 668:
ellauri192.html on line 735: - What language do these dudes sing in, does anyone know? Belarussian or russian? Probably worth a mention in the article.
ellauri194.html on line 488: What is the social justice activists' endgame? Did Faramir become a Steward? Why are European counties so big compared to American ones?Why do North Africans move to France if France colonized and oppressed them for years? Is it worth it to sacrifice Ukraine to keep the International Space Station going? What does the Constitution say about the right to privacy?
ellauri194.html on line 1003: Kekä on Taflat Top joka koittaa huijata rahaa laahuxelta Elon Muskin ja Ilta-Pulun avulla? Onko se tää roistonnäköinen leadership akateemikko Jimi Terska Californiasta? The Academy For Leadership and Training? The Outfit for Dealership And Suckering? Jimi Terska on kirjoittanut kirjan WORST Practices...in Corporate Training: Spectacular Disasters...What We Do by Jim Glantz. In this kinda book, we'll laugh and you learn as you hear us successful trainers tell our most horrific training disaster stories…and what the suckers learned were the root causes of their failures. After each of our epic failure stories, Jim skillfully provides simple-to-use templates and checklists to help make sure you make the same mistakes and pitfalls in your own training programs. Like hire more snakeoil salesmen like us.
ellauri196.html on line 293: Some idiot suggests that Auden's most famous poem, ‘Funeral Blues’, is ‘misread’ as sincere elegy when it was intended to be a send-up or parody of public obituaries. What an infantile idea! Rather, Auden's point is: We must make fun of one another AND die. Auden oli mielestäni suht hyvä, vahinko vaan että se näyttää Lewisin naziapulaiselta.
ellauri196.html on line 842: Onko runous vielä mahdollista v 1975? What has been the contribution of dynamite to the centuries-long diatribe on the meaning of life? I refer to human life and not to the appearance of the amino-acids, tarkentaa Montane Nobel-puheessa.
ellauri197.html on line 119: What lively lad most pleasured me Mikä eläväisistä pojista
ellauri197.html on line 138: What none other knows, Mitä muut ei tiedäkään,
ellauri197.html on line 221: Jo oli kylmä perse miehexeen. What a sod. No entäs sitten tää:
ellauri197.html on line 325: What the fuck? The idiot who wrote the analysis could not parse the poem! All that takes place in the first 2 lines of poem is that a Chomsky topicalization transformation moves the clausal objects of the main verbs to the front. There is nothing the matter with the tenses in the poem, it is all quite run of the mill.
ellauri198.html on line 43: Whatever you do, do with Interest.
ellauri198.html on line 195: What will become of you and me
ellauri198.html on line 201: What is the self amid this blaze?
ellauri198.html on line 202: What am I now that I was then
ellauri198.html on line 225: What am I now that I was then?
ellauri198.html on line 260: Esim Roland was the name of a real-life medieval military leader under Charlemagne who, more importantly, was the subject of the oldest surviving major work of French literature: an epic poem titled The Song of Roland. Roland was a loyal and trusting knight who was told to bring up the rear guard and burst his own temples open while sounding a horn too vigorously. What a way to go! In 1855, Robert Browning made the warrior the subject of his poem “Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came,” which leads us back to Stephen King, of all the U.S. turds. It’s a bit incongruous to think of Dorff’s Roland West—an uncouth man who refers to “Saigon trim” and is eager to start a fight.
ellauri198.html on line 288: What is love?
ellauri198.html on line 318: What do you think Warren means by that?
ellauri198.html on line 368: What else should he be set for, with his staff? Mitä varten muuten sillä keppi
ellauri198.html on line 369: What, save to waylay with his lies, ensnare Olis ojossa kuin maantieviitta,
ellauri198.html on line 385: What with my search drawn out thro' years, my hope Ympäriinsä ilman kyytiä kuin mamutaxi,
ellauri198.html on line 450: Were jealous else. What made those holes and rents Niin nousi heti paha huuto koko joukosta.
ellauri198.html on line 490: What honest men should dare (he said) he durst. Kun se uskalsi tehdä kuten mekin.
ellauri198.html on line 517: Whate'er that was, rolled by, deterred no whit. Mitä olikin, sitä ei pysäyttänyt käsin.
ellauri198.html on line 537: What penned them there, with all the plain to choose? Kuka oli sulkenut ne sinne, mitä järkeä,
ellauri198.html on line 545: What bad use was that engine for, that wheel, oli jonkinlainen SM laite, mitä hyötyä?
ellauri198.html on line 600: What in the midst lay but the Tower itself? Mikäs torni sieltä näkyy keskimmäisenä!
ellauri198.html on line 831: His several boring plays featured fictional heroic ancient Irish warrior Cuchulain. A later poem concludes with a brash announcement: “There’s more enterprise in walking naked.” This indecent departure from a conventional 19th-century manner disappointed his contemporary readers, who preferred the pleasant musicality of such familiar poems as “The Lake Isle of Innisfree,” which he wrote in 1890. "I think all happiness depends on the energy to assume the mask of some other person, on strutting as somebody else but yourself", he said. Yeats and his lamentable wife held more than 400 sessions of automatic writing, producing nearly 4,000 pages that Yeats avidly and patiently studied and organized. What an idiot.
ellauri203.html on line 115: In penal servitude, Dostoevsky went through something that he calls “the regeneration of his convictions”. What could have taken place to change his convictions so completely? Dostoevsky himself answers this question by saying, “I accepted Christ in my life, whom I got to know as a child in my parent’s house and whom I have almost lost, when I in turn became a European liberal.” Putinistit paukuttavat karvaisia käsiään. Keskeytymättömiä aplodeja seisaaltaan.
ellauri203.html on line 156: Turgenev, in turn, was annoyed by Dostoyevsky´s psychological preoccupations and his manner going deep into the dark depths of the human soul. "What a sour smell and hospital stench" and "psychological nitpicking" were some of the phrases he used to describe Dostoyevsky´s novels. By jove he hit it right on the dot.
ellauri203.html on line 227: Suslova’s impact on Dostoevsky can be felt through all of his novels. We can glimpse her traits in the sacrificial Dunya (Crime and Punishment – 1866), the desperate and passionate Nastassya Filippovna (The Idiot – 1869), the proud and nervous Liza (Demons – 1872). What is more, Polina, the protagonist in The Gambler, was undoubtedly based on Suslova.
ellauri204.html on line 743: Furthermore, she had an "affair with" the therapist who replaced Orne in the 1960s. Orne considered the "affair" with the second therapist (given the pseudonym "Ollie Zweizung" by Middlebrook and Linda Sexton) to be the catalyst that eventually resulted in her suicide. What a mess!
ellauri206.html on line 63: The concept is often attributed to Russian playwright Anton Chekhov, reputed to have said "Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass." What Chekhov actually said, in a letter to his brother, was "In descriptions of Nature one must seize on small details, grouping them so that when the reader closes his eyes he gets a picture. For instance, you’ll have a moonlit night if you write that on the mill dam a piece of glass from a broken bottle glittered like a bright little star, and that the black shadow of a dog or a wolf rolled past like a ball."
ellauri206.html on line 95: Sleazy Capital News (Hufvudstadsbladet) in its optimistically titled two-column report "This is how we avoid global warming" left out 2/5 of Gutierres energy recommendations. Only increases in investmets got a mention. What was left out? Well these:
ellauri207.html on line 441: Summana TER on lyhenne tai lyhenne sana, joka on määritetty yksinkertaisella kielellä. Tämä sivu havainnollistaa, miten TER on käytössä viesti-ja keskustelu foorumeilla sosiaalisen median ohjelmistojen, kuten VK, Instagram, WhatsApp ja snapchat, lisäksi. Edellä olevasta taulukosta voit tarkastella kaikkia kohteen TER merkityksiä: Jotkut ovat koulutus termejä, muut ovat lääketieteellisiä termejä ja jopa tieto koneen termejä. Jos tiedät toisen määrityksen TER, ota meihin yhteyttä. Sisällytämme sen seuraavan tieto kanta päivityksen aikana. Huomioittehan, että vierailijat ovat luoneet joitain lyhenteitä ja niiden määritelmiä. Siksi ehdotuksenne uusista akronyyteistä on erittäin tervetullut! Vastineeksi Olemme kääntäneet kohteen TER lyhennettä espanjaksi, ranskaksi, kiinaksi, portugaliksi, venäjäksi jne. Voit vierittää alaspäin ja napsauttaa kieli-valikkoa löytääksesi kohteen TER merkitykset muilla 42-kielillä.
ellauri210.html on line 333:
Picasso was a prolific artist. What fun.
ellauri210.html on line 379: At the height of his fame and success, while The Importance of Being Earnest (1895) was still being performed in London, Wilde prosecuted the Marquess of Queensberry for criminal libel. The Marquess was the father of Wilde's lover, Lord Alfred Douglas. The libel trial unearthed evidence that caused Wilde to drop his charges and led to his own arrest and trial for gross indecency with men. After two more trials he was convicted and sentenced to two years' hard labour, the maximum penalty, and was jailed from 1895 to 1897. During his last year in prison, he wrote De Profundis (published posthumously in 1905), a long letter which discusses his spiritual journey through his trials, forming a dark counterpoint to his earlier philosophy of pleasure. On his release, he left immediately for France, and never returned to Ireland or Britain. There he wrote his last work, The Ballad of Reading Gaol (1898), a long poem commemorating the harsh rhythms of prison life. What an opportunity for a man of his caliber, one would have thought.
ellauri210.html on line 381: In the summer of 1914, Cravan began another phase of wandering. In 1916, he found himself in Barcelona where he somehow managed to book himself a high-profile fight against Jack Johnson. Johnson was in the midst of a celebrated stay in Spain, during which he was received by royalty and starred in movies. Photographs from the fight give some idea of the scale of the event, which was held at Barcelona’s huge bullfighting arena La Monumental. What the photos don’t convey is what a mismatch the fight was. Even a ring-rusty, thirty-eight-year-old Johnson was leagues ahead of Cravan. Johnson won with a sixth-round knockout, though it could’ve been over much sooner had he wished it. There are reports that Cravan shook with fear before the contest began, knowing how out of his depth he was. One writer has suggested that “Johnson and Cravan were more collaborators than competitors,” and that the event was a con, just a hype-fueled payday for an aging legend and a flamboyant interloper with no credible chance of a win—the Mayweather-McGregor of its day. Olikos tää se mazi josta toinen nyrkkipelle Heminwau kirjoitti siinä sonniromaanissa?
ellauri213.html on line 201: What-are-demands-Julia2.jpg.png?resize=768%2C541&ssl=1" />
ellauri213.html on line 326: Moshe Raab will never forget, nor forgive. Mosaic God is not a forgiving one. Mosaic beer is good, unlike Foster's. Leila Khaled hijacked my and my mother's and my siblings' plane. Why did a public university invite her to speak? Even after 50 years, the convicted terrorist who changed my life has never disavowed her actions. What will she teach SFSU students?
ellauri213.html on line 335: In theory, San Francisco State University President Lynn Mahoney is correct in stating that a university is a place where different ideas are presented, discussed and analyzed so that individual conclusions can be drawn. But does that justify giving an unrepentant terrorist a forum to address the students? What will she teach them? The proper way to hijack an aircraft, based on her success in 1969, and what mistakes to avoid based on her failure in 1970? When I was a student in university, I often faced new ideas that ran contrary to my beliefs. But these perspectives were presented by knowledgeable, respectable academics. Some were Nobel Prize winners. None were terrorists. Most of them were Jews.
ellauri214.html on line 171: It might be a Scottish name, taken from a story about two men on a train. One man says, 'What's that package up there in the baggage rack?' And the other answers, 'Oh, that's a MacGuffin'. The first one asks, 'What's a MacGuffin?' 'Well,' the other man says, 'it's an apparatus for trapping lions in the Scottish Highlands.' The first man says, 'But there are no lions in the Scottish Highlands,' and the other one answers, 'Well then, that's no MacGuffin!' So you see that a MacGuffin is actually nothing at all.
ellauri217.html on line 264: Trustee Kadri-Helena onkin varmaan se ketku jutku Ben Gurion tms joka sai atomipommin teko-ohjeen heimoveljiltä jenkeistä. Israel's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion was "nearly obsessed" with obtaining nuclear weapons to prevent the Holocaust from reoccurring. He stated, "What Einstein, Oppenheimer, and Teller, the three of them are Jews, made for the United States, could also be done by scientists in Israel, for their own people". Deborah Brand 3 Aug 2022 0 2:04 Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid said this week Israel has "other capabilities" against threats from Iran, in a rare allusion to the country's widely reported nuclear stockpile.
ellauri217.html on line 270: Toistensa piiput suussa pojat filosofeeraavat. What do you hate most? Losing my tooth. Why do we die, Arafat? Why do we live, Kadri-Helena? Osku ei ole älynnyt että toisten kateus on osa onnea. Pössyttelijät kaipaavat herra isoherraa takaisin. Niin kauan kuin on kuoleman jälkeistä elämää ja käskyttäjiä on toivoa. Ei tullut niistä lasta eikä paskaakaan.
ellauri217.html on line 695: What has changed with the giving of the Torah is that now, it is the duty of the Jewish people to bring the rest of the world to fulfill the Seven Laws of Noah.
ellauri219.html on line 603:
What's New Pussycat?
ellauri219.html on line 607: What's new pussycat? Whoa, whoa, whoa
ellauri219.html on line 608: What's new pussycat? Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa
ellauri219.html on line 614: What's new pussycat? Whoa, whoa, whoa
ellauri219.html on line 615: What's new pussycat? Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa
ellauri219.html on line 621: What's new pussycat? Whoa, whoa, whoa
ellauri219.html on line 622: What's new pussycat? Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa
ellauri219.html on line 631: What's New Pussycat? is a 1965 screwball comedy film directed by Clive Donner, written by Woody Allen in his first produced screenplay, and starring Allen in his acting debut, along with Peter Sellers, Peter O'Toole, Romy Schneider, Capucine, Paula Prentiss, and Ursula Undress.
ellauri219.html on line 832: And there is something… “gee willywickers” about the way Truth Justice and The American Way have been inflated in American mass culture, quite plausibly rooted in that class insecurity, that makes outside cultural elites (and the people that follow after them) reflexively sneer, once they realise the foundations are rotten. Add to this the ludicrous fact that America has no high culture. These are disappointed suitors: they’re not going to console themselves over the emptiness of Scrooge McDuck by turning to Wilt Whatman. Who was no better off than Scrooge by way of civility.
ellauri219.html on line 1014: As a child of the 20th century, I suppose, this book sorta speaks to me. Talk to the hand. It precipitates into meaning historical movies I’ve seen. Don is like Wilt Whatman who addressed, in the poem “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry”, the people of the future. Sublime but ironic.
ellauri219.html on line 1018: Then there’s Moonman 157 and Klara Sax, a feminist ideal of Land Art. What do they have in common? Smudging useful things with paint. An artistic version of food fight. What do Jayne Mansfield’s breasts remind adolescent Eric of? The bumper bullets on a Cadillac. What does Dumb of Dumb and Dumber take for a cute lady's boobs? A semi trailer's fog lights. Meanwhile, Eric masturbates into a condom that reminds him of a missile (with his tiny wiener all loaded and cocked inside). Dad polishes his Buick, the son his dick. The clammy hand of coincidence.
ellauri220.html on line 580: Takas Löllöön kesken albumia 221. Wilt Whatman, Dos Passos, John Sinclair, Saul Bellow, Don deLillo, Foster Wallace, ketä vielä olis näitä Amerikan eepoxen väsääjiä? Pynchon olisi paizi että sateenkaarikirja kertoo Euroopasta. Mua ei vois vähempää kiinnostaa Lillon tyhmän pesäpallon kohtalot. Portugalilaissyntyiseltä Dos Passosilta olen muistaaxeni lukenut jonkun New York aiheisen buchleinin joka oli mielestäni silloin aika hyvä.
ellauri222.html on line 205: Horrified that Madeleine and Gersbach might be abusing his child (in the novel, a girl), Herzog rushes off to his deceased father’s house, finds a gun his father owned, and goes to Madeleine’s. It is evening. He creeps into the yard and watches Madeleine and Gersbach through the window, loaded pistol in hand. What he sees is an ordinary domestic scene. Gersbach is giving the little girl a bath. Herzog creeps away.
ellauri222.html on line 361: Grandma Lausch tells Augie, “The more you love people the more they’ll mix you up. A child loves, a person respects. Respect is better than love.” Which is really better, respect or love? The two brothers, Augie and Simon, are on opposite sides of this argument. Augie identifies himself on the side of love. An idealist with a soft heart, he is almost comically susceptible to falling in love, and openly shows his sympathy, even toward the small lizards that are killed by the eagle Caligula. Augie’s vision for an orphan home and academy is driven by his motivation to share love. Simon, on the other hand, prefers respect. He marries Charlotte and stays with her because he admires her business sense, not because he feels romantic love for her. He doesn’t care whether the men at the club love him. In fact, he knows they hate him. But this doesn’t matter to him as long as he is respected. Ultimately, Simon is richer and more successful, but Augie seems happier. What's love got to do with it. What a reptile.
ellauri222.html on line 803:
Ihmiset kysyvät myös: What is neo transcendentalism?
Ihmiset kysyvät myös: What was Sir Walter Raleigh best known for?
ellauri223.html on line 94: G.M. What about their judges?
ellauri223.html on line 182: Bacon stated that he had three goals: to uncover truth, to serve his country, and to serve his church. He sought to achieve these goals by seeking a prestigious post. Yet he failed to gain a position that he thought would lead him to success. He showed signs of sympathy to Puritanism, attending the sermons of the Puritan chaplain of Gray's Inn and accompanying his mother to the Temple Church to hear Walter Travers. In the Parliament of 1586, he openly urged execution for the Catholic Mary, Queen of Scots. He advocated for the union of England and Scotland, which made him a significant influence toward the consolidation of the United Kingdom; and he later would advocate for the integration of Ireland into the Union. Closer constitutional ties, he believed, would bring greater peace and strength to these countries. What a motherfucker.
ellauri223.html on line 206: What so ever I have given, granted, conferred, or appointed to my wife in the former part of this my Will, I do now for just and great causes, utterly revoke, and make void, and leave her to her right only.
ellauri226.html on line 122: There was a David Herbert Lawrence plaque on the street. Inside the tiny station were two more. It seemed a lot of plaques for a guy who spent one night there. “Blessed is he that expecteth nothing,” he wrote of Sorgono, “for he shall not be disappointed.” More Niente. “A dreary hole!” Lawrence muttered. “A cold, hopeless, lifeless, Saturday afternoon-weary village.” The food was bad. The bedsheets were stained. People cheerfully relieved themselves on the street. What limp parsnips too! “Why are you so indignant?” the Q.B. asked. “It’s all life.”
ellauri226.html on line 489: prime motivating factor for their departure. What they really meant were the fucking 2nd wave immigrants. Brian Werner, Elvira Werner, and Kathleen Roby all moved out of The Bronx during the 1960s and 1970s, and describe crime and the changing neighborhood as the major influence in their decision. My mom herself, she began running red lights because she was afraid of being raped if stopping too long in certain intersections. After her tires were stolen repeatedly while waiting for the traffic lights to change Mrs. Roby moved to Long Island in 1980, where her better-off sister already resided.
ellauri236.html on line 82: Share on WhatsApp
ellauri236.html on line 98: One man interviewed by The New York Times played a video he received on WhatsApp that said Mr. Bolsonaro had visited Russia this year to get President Vladimir V. Putin’s help in fighting the Brazilian left’s plans to steal Sunday’s election.
ellauri236.html on line 100: Most of Mr. Bolsonaro’s supporters said in interviews that they do not trust mainstream news outlets, which Mr. Bolsonaro has attacked as dishonest, and instead rely on news from a wide variety of sources on their phones, including social-media posts and messages they receive in groups on WhatsApp and Telegram.
ellauri236.html on line 108: According to Brazil's Superior Electoral Court, Positivo Tecnologia, a Brazilian company, won the most recent bid to produce electronic voting machines for this year's election. Smartmatic and Dominion confirmed their equipment is not being used in Brazil. But the voting machine claims resurged this month, both in WhatsApp messages in Brazil about Smartmatic and in English-language posts on U.S. social media sites claiming, incorrectly, that Dominion or Smartmatic machines were used in Brazil.
ellauri236.html on line 204: In borrowing from William Faulkner's Sanctuary, Chase only took the plot; the mental atmosphere of the two books is not similar. Chase really derives from other sources, and this particular bit of borrowing is only symbolic. What it symbolizes is the vulgarization of ideas which is constantly happening, and which probably happens faster in an age of print. Chase has been described as ‘Faulkner for the masses’, but it would be more accurate to describe him as Carlyle for the masses. He is a popular writer — there are many such in America, but they are still rarities in England — who has caught up with what is now fashionable to call ‘realism’, meaning the doctrine that might is right. The growth of ‘realism’ has been the great feature of the intellectual history of our own age. Why this should be so is a complicated question. The interconnexion between sadism, masochism, success-worship, power-worship, nationalism, and totalitarianism is a huge subject whose edges have barely been scratched, and even to mention it is considered somewhat indelicate. To take merely the first example that comes to mind, I believe no one has ever pointed out the sadistic and masochistic element in Bernard Shaw's work, still less suggested that this probably has some connexion with Shaw's admiration for dictators. Fascism is often loosely equated with sadism, but nearly always by people who see nothing wrong in the most slavish worship of Stalin. The truth is, of course, that the countless English intellectuals who kiss the arse of Stalin are not different from the minority who give their allegiance to Hitler or Mussolini, nor from the efficiency experts who preached ‘punch’, ‘drive’, ‘personality’ and ‘learn to be a Tiger man’ in the nineteen-twenties, nor from that older generation of intellectuals, Carlyle, Creasey and the rest of them, who bowed down before German militarism. All of them are worshipping power and successful cruelty. It is important to notice that the cult of power tends to be mixed up with a love of cruelty and wickedness for their own sakes. A tyrant is all the more admired if he happens to be a bloodstained crook as well, and ‘the end justifies the means’ often becomes, in effect, ‘the means justify themselves provided they are dirty enough’. This idea colours the outlook of all sympathizers with totalitarianism, and accounts, for instance, for the positive delight with which many English intellectuals greeted the Nazi-Soviet pact. It was a step only doubtfully useful to the U.S.S.R., but it was entirely unmoral, and for that reason to be admired; the explanations of it, which were numerous and self-contradictory, could come afterwards.
ellauri236.html on line 206: Until recently the characteristic adventure stories of the English-speaking peoples have been stories in which the hero fights against odds. This is true all the way from Robin Hood to Pop-eye the Sailor. Perhaps the basic myth of the Western world is Jack the Giant-killer, but to be brought up to date this should be renamed Jack the Dwarf-killer, and there already exists a considerable literature which teaches, either overtly or implicitly, that one should side with the big man against the little man. Most of what is now written about foreign policy is simply an embroidery on this theme, and for several decades such phrases as ‘Play the game’, ‘Don't hit a man when he's down’ and ‘It's not cricket’ have never failed to draw a snigger from anyone of intellectual pretensions. What is comparatively new is to find the accepted pattern, according to which (a) right is right and wrong is wrong, whoever wins, and (b) weakness must be respected, disappearing from popular literature as well. When I first read D. H. Lawrence's novels, at the age of about twenty, I was puzzled by the fact that there did not seem to be any classification of the characters into ‘good’ and ‘bad’. Lawrence seemed to sympathize with all of them about equally, and this was so unusual as to give me the feeling of having lost my bearings. Today no one would think of looking for heroes and villains in a serious novel, but in lowbrow fiction one still expects to find a sharp distinction between right and wrong and between legality and illegality. The common people, on the whole, are still living in the world of absolute good and evil from which the intellectuals have long since escaped. But the popularity of No Orchids and the American books and magazines to which it is akin shows how rapidly the doctrine of ‘realism’ is gaining ground.
ellauri236.html on line 405: “Are you sure it’s safe to use?” “Yeah. It can stay up all night.” She settled down in the bed. “Can it?” She spoke so softly he scarcely heard what she said, but he did hear. He suddenly grinned. “Well, there’s no law against it, is there? Do you want me to stay?” “Now you’re making me wet,” the girl said and hid her face. “What a question to ask a lady.” "My spaghetti’s going to be world famous in a moment. I promise.”
ellauri236.html on line 479: I will pay you three thousand dollars right now and if you find them, you’ll get a further thirty thousand dollars. That’s my proposition. What do you say?” "The F.B.I. are the best FBI in the world. If they’ve failed to find these hoods, I’ll probably fail too, but I’ll have a try.”
ellauri236.html on line 492: What did this Borg girl do for a living when she was going around with Riley?” he asked.
ellauri236.html on line 510: “What kills me,” Paula said as she got into the car with a generous show of nylon-clad legs, “is I always have to buy my own corsage. The day you think of buying me one, I’ll faint.”
ellauri238.html on line 716: Pentti oli super kusipää, onnexi se kuoli suht nuorena. 1/3 sen maxasta oli arpikudosta jo 1973. Antti Hyryn mielestä Keravan talo oli penalaisille liian suuri. Leveitä lautoja. Aitta. Uuni. Oli siinäkin toinen turrvelo. Pena heittää Tuula2n tarjoamat appeet seinille jos ne ei jostain syystä kelpaa sille. Hän ei mukista huoli keittoa. Hän ei syö einexiä. Tuula2 oli laiska, tyhmä ja ruma. Pena oli ahkera, älykäs ja kaunis. What a laugh. Legenda jo eläessään. Vanha, rappeutunut, viinaan kuollut, säälittävä Leino. Pentti istuu keittiössä silmä hädin tuskin auki, kaze harmaana. Pöydällä kossupullo, roskixessa toinen, räkäisiä nenäliinoja, likaisia astioita, pölyä, sotkua, vaatteita hujan hajan, hajua ja törkyä. Pentti tukkihumalassa, viinasta vetelänä, puolitajuttomana, savukkeenpätkä sormissa, jotka ovat laihat ja keltaiset kuin kanan varpaat, toinen tupakka käryämässä täydessä tuhkakupissa, kolmas matolla, johon on jo palanut reikä. Juoppoputki, juopporemmi, juopporeissu, on se kumma miten viina miestä syö. Kaiken lisäxi se on vielä pahaa.
ellauri238.html on line 919: What are we doing, coming back here with this pain? Mitä me oikeen tehdään kun tullaan tänne kipuilemaan taas?
ellauri238.html on line 926: What are we doing Mitä me oikeen tehdään
ellauri238.html on line 932: What are we doing with these souls of mist, with these names, Mitä me tehdään näillä sumuisilla sieluilla, näillä nimillä,
ellauri240.html on line 103: Nancy steps outside into a bright and foggy morning where all her friends and her mother are still alive. Nancy gets into Glen's convertible to go to school when the green and red striped top suddenly comes down and locks them in as the car drives uncontrollably down the street. Three girls in white dresses playing jump rope are heard chanting Krueger's nursery rhyme as Marge is grabbed by Krueger through the front door window. What a sad compromise! All just so they can keep on making sequels to the film. WTF. I can't stand film directors.
ellauri240.html on line 500: Founded in 2008 by Rainn Wilson et al., SoulPancake was created to encourage open-heart dialogue about what it means to be human. Throughout the years, we created content that explores the ways we all seek connection, hope, truth, identity, and purpose. (What a revolting bunch of buzzwords!)
ellauri241.html on line 360: What canst thou say or do of charm enough Mitä voit sanoa tai tehdä tarpeeksi viehätysvoimaisesti
ellauri241.html on line 368: What taste of purer air hast thou to soothe mitä puhtaamman ilman makua sinulla on rauhoittaaksesi
ellauri241.html on line 369: My essence? What serener palaces, olemustani? Mitkä rauhallisemmat palatsit,
ellauri241.html on line 547: What mortal hath a prize, that other men Millä kuolevaisella on palkinto, että muut ihmiset
ellauri241.html on line 718: What wreath for Lamia? What for Lycius? Mikä seppele Leimiälle? Mitä Lyciukselle?
ellauri241.html on line 719: What for the sage, old Apollonius? Mikä viisaalle, vanhalle kuikelolle Apolloniuxelle?
ellauri241.html on line 852: What thou among the leaves hast never known, Mitä sinä lehtien joukossa et ole koskaan tuntenut,
ellauri241.html on line 1198: What to think of it; from forth his sides
ellauri241.html on line 1273: What! dost thou move? Are you up? O bliss! O pain!
ellauri241.html on line 1311: What a melancholy thought: O he had swoon'd
ellauri241.html on line 1364: What is more, thou art a relief
ellauri241.html on line 1406: “What is there in thee, Moon! that thou shouldst move
ellauri241.html on line 1440: With new-born life! What shall I do? Where go,
ellauri241.html on line 1462: Mutter'd: “What lonely death am I to die
ellauri241.html on line 1559: What am I supposed to do?
ellauri241.html on line 1579: What fun! A groovy time was had by all.
ellauri241.html on line 1585: Have I put forth to serve thee. What, not yet
ellauri243.html on line 289: exactly the most pleasant list, but if you’ve ever wondered, “What ellauri243.html on line 527: Rocky: What book covers the American Hollocost?
ellauri243.html on line 642: That´s one reason most incredibly successful people set a goal, and then focus all their attention on the creating and following a process designed to achieve that goal. The goal still exists, but their real focus is on what they do today. And making sure that do it again tomorrow. Because consistency matters: What you do every day is who you are. Like take a shit. And who you will become. A piece of shit.
ellauri244.html on line 437: I'm Faye Bird, author of My Second Life and What I Couldn't Tell You . My latest book is My Secret Lies With You. If you came here to find out more about me, and my books, then you are in the right place. Welcome! Patron of Reading If you are a student, parent or teacher at Elthorne Park High School then please do head to my Patron of Reading page.
ellauri244.html on line 563: No olipa turhanpöiväistä löpinää. Älkää LÖPISKO! olisi Omppu huutanut. In 2014 the book was reissued as Jonathan Livingston Seagull: The Complete Edition, which added a 17-page fourth part to the story. Bach reported that he was inspired to finish the fourth part of the novella by a near-death experience which had occurred in relation to a near-fatal plane crash in August 2012. What a pity.
ellauri244.html on line 571: "No! No, that's not it." Anthony was awake and alive for the first time in his life, inspired. "What was that?"
ellauri244.html on line 593: Here in my opinion is the only imaginative prose-writer of the slightest value who has appeared among the English-speaking races for some years past. Even if that is objected to as an overstatement (there is me, after all), it will probably be admitted that Miller is a writer out of the ordinary, worth more than a single glance; and after all, he is a completely negative, unconstructive, amoral writer, a mere Jonah, a passive acceptor of evil, a sort of Whitman among the corpses. Paizi Whatman oli peräreikämiehiä.
ellauri245.html on line 159: And another question started coming up: How do you come up with these things? Meaning: What kind of sick, perverted mind could come up with such ideas? I tried to look within myself, to ask if the violence in the book was really appropriately calibrated for the purpose: to say something about the character behind it (dvs mig). Or if I had let myself be lured into sensationalism, effects for the sake of effects and a callous fascination with suffering. Had I created a Norvegian Psycho, just such a book, one that had become a sort of guilty pleasure for closet sadists?
ellauri245.html on line 662: The British and international view was that Mau Mau was a savage, violent, and depraved tribal cult, an expression of unrestrained emotion rather than reason. Mau Mau was "perverted tribalism" that sought to take the Kikuyu people back to "the bad old days" before British rule. What motherfuckers!
ellauri246.html on line 243: How came they here? What burst of Christian hate, Mistä ne tänne tulivat? Mikä kristitty
ellauri246.html on line 244: What persecution, merciless and blind, vainolainen, armoton ja silmitön,
ellauri247.html on line 97: Every excuse she could think of, to save herself, she made. But her excuses were in vain, and Narahdarn only became furious with her for making them, and, brandishing his boondi, drove her up the tree. She managed to get her arm in beside her sister's, but there it stuck and she could not move it. Narahdarn, who was watching her, saw what had happened and followed her up the tree. Finding he could not pull her arm out, in spite of her cries, he chopped it off, as he had done her sister's. After one shriek, as he drove his combo through her arm, she was silent. He said, "Come down, and I will chop out the bees' nest." But she did not answer him, and he saw that she too was dead. Then he was frightened, and climbed quickly down the gunnyanny tree; taking her body to the ground with him, he laid it beside her sister's, and quickly he hurried from the spot, taking no further thought of the honey. What a piece of shit.
ellauri247.html on line 273: Like Prior, Fielding, Shenstone, and Dickens, Smollett was a connoisseur in inns and innkeepers. He knew good food and he knew good value, and he had a mighty keen eye for a rogue. There may, it is true, have been something in his manner which provoked them to exhibit their worst side to him. What a nasty customer.
ellauri247.html on line 297: "If a Frenchman is admitted into your family, and distinguished by repeated marks of your friendship and regard, the first return he makes for your civilities is to make love to your wife, if she is handsome; if not, to your sister, or daughter, or niece. If he suffers a repulse from your wife, or attempts in vain to debauch your sister, or your daughter, or your niece, he will, rather than not play the traitor with his gallantry, make his addresses to your grandmother; and ten to one but in one shape or another he will find means to ruin the peace of a family in which he has been so kindly entertained. What he cannot accomplish by dint of compliment and personal attendance, he will endeavour to effect by reinforcing these with billets-doux, songs, and verses, of which he always makes a provision for such purposes. If he is detected in these efforts of treachery, and reproached with his ingratitude, he impudently declares that what he had done was no more than simple gallantry, considered in France as an indispensable duty on every man who pretended to good breeding. Nay, he will even affirm that his endeavours to corrupt your wife, or deflower your daughter, were the most genuine proofs he could give of his particular regard for your family.
ellauri247.html on line 343: Johnson bragged that he could finish his dictionary project in three years. In comparison, the Académie Française had 40 scholars spending 40 years to complete their dictionary, which prompted Johnson to claim, "This is the proportion. Let me see; forty times forty is sixteen hundred. As three to sixteen hundred, so is the proportion of an Englishman to a Frenchman." Rather, the proportion of the civilized vernacular vocabularies of the languages. What a pompous idiot. Although he did not succeed in completing the work in three years, he did manage to finish it in eight. Some criticised the dictionary, including the historian Thomas Babington Macaulay, who described Johnson as "a wretched etymologist."
ellauri247.html on line 383: Helen Keller said of democracy in the US: "Our democracy is but a name. We vote? What does that mean? It means that we choose between two bodies of real, though not avowed, autocrats. We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee."
ellauri247.html on line 469: What a punishment new Mikähän rangaistusseuraamus
ellauri247.html on line 513: What does fantassin mean? - definitions
ellauri248.html on line 125: And the worst part? The mystery from twenty years ago that causes this entire fucking BOOK and that was way more interesting than the normal mystery? Literally no fucking resolution. Who did it? How did they do it? What is up with that hair clip in the forest and the blood inside Rob’s shoes? NO ONE FUCKING KNOWS. I’m sure this is framed in the minds of many readers as some kind of deeper meaning about memory. You know what I thought, honestly? Tana French wrote herself into a corner with a fucking ridiculous case and then ran out of time on her deadline and decided to leave it open. [krimi, whodunit]
ellauri249.html on line 80: It is precisely in this sense that we should understand Dostoyevsky’s remark that beauty will save the world, or Matthew Arnold’s belief that we shall be saved by poetry. It is probably too late for the world, but for the individual man (me) there always remains a chance. What distinguishes us from other members of the animal kingdom is speech. Literature—and poetry, in particular, my poetry—is, to put it bluntly, the goal of our species.” Minä minä! Täähän on pahempi egosentrikko kuin minä ja pikku-CEC Norjassa.
ellauri249.html on line 482: Why would Finns want to attack Russia? What have they got that we have not? Well, good vodka, and Karelia. I am partial to the Russian Standard Vodka. Besides, it’s distilled from the waters of Lake Ladoga. Thus, every time I have finished a bottle of Russkij Standard, and urinated, I have removed a part of Lake Ladoga and made it part of the local water supply. Literally taking back Karelia a bottle at the time.
ellauri254.html on line 517: In Munich, the Cosmic Circle of Ludwig Klages and Alfred Schuler, deeming "the Jew the enemy of the human race," gave their erstwhile leader, Stefan George, this ultimatum: "What is your stand on Judah?" He replied that he wished he had more such deep-throated Jewish disciples as Wolfskehl. George's views continued to overlap with those of the Cosmic Circle, especially in invoking the pagan earth mother of "Templars." Actually what first launched the George cult on a nationwide basis was Klages's own book, Stefan George, of 1902. The accusation of Klages's Nazism by indignantly pointing out that the Nazis distinctly distanced themselves from Klages. Though the Nazis shared Klages's basic metapolitics and had found him useful for propaganda among professors, they later found the Klages-Schuler cult embarrassing. The intensity of George's break with Klages-Schuler is paralleled by Nietzsche's break with the Jew-hater Richard Wagner; in both cases an intense friendship was severed on the grounds of civilized values higher than friendship. Klages thought that Nazis and Israelis were both wrong in thinking they were the chosen people, with the difference that the Jews had actually already won the beauty contest.
ellauri257.html on line 392: What I find most galling is that while he is ranting about “cultural Marxists”, he is actually drawing on ideas espoused by exactly these “cultural Marxists”! İn other words, he is mischaracterising as “the enemy” the very people who created many of the arguments he himself utilises!
ellauri257.html on line 452: A Russian wife turned to her husband and asked, "What's this special military operation our glorious leader keeps talking about?" Her husband replied, "It's a war to stop America and NATO." "Oh, right” she says “How's it going?"
ellauri257.html on line 508: Happily, when I last visited Singer’s archives at the Ransom Center, in Austin, Texas, I located the manuscript. Unhappily, it is far less than Alma had promised — not only in length (I came across 13 pages, a number of them only a few lines long,) but also in content. The first page has a title penciled in capital letters: “What Life Is Like With a Writer.”
ellauri257.html on line 520: What kind of inner, private life did Alma have? Did she tire of years of cooking, cleaning, ironing and sewing for Singer? Was it difficult to be the wife of a public person? How did she cope with his escapades? About these the manuscript remains silent. After all, Alma belonged to a social class where women weren’t encouraged to explore such details. In an interview, she does represent the younger Singer as easy-going and says how much he changed over time. But she ascribes those changes to how much people wanted from him and not the other way around.
ellauri260.html on line 78: "Der Personalismusta" käytti ensimmäisen kerran F. D. E. Schleiermacher (1768–1834) kirjassaan Über die Religion vuonna 1799. Amos Bronson Alcott, paljon tunnetumman Louisa M. Alcottin isä, Emersonin tuillaeläjä, näyttää olleen ensimmäinen amerikkalainen, joka käytti termiä ja kutsui sitä vuoden 1863 esseessä "opiksi, jonka mukaan maailman perimmäinen todellisuus on jumalallinen henkilö, joka ylläpitää maailmankaikkeutta jatkuvalla luovan tahdon teolla". Termin "amerikkalainen personalismi" loi Walt Whitman (1819–1892) esseessään "Personalism", joka julkaistiin The Galaxy -lehdessä toukokuussa 1868. Wilt Whatmanilla oli paljon omakohtaista kokemusta perseistä. Vuonna 1903 Charles Renouvier julkaisi teoksen Le Personnalisme, joka toi sanan myös ranskaksi. Sana "personalismi" ilmestyi ensimmäisen kerran tietosanakirjana Hastingsin uskonnon ja etiikan tietosanakirjan IX osassa vuonna 1915 Ralph T. Flewellingin artikkelissa.
ellauri260.html on line 256: What I meant are the "unqualified submission of individuals to the social collectivity" and the "treatment of the economic task as the chief business of life" parts.
ellauri260.html on line 353: It wishes to bind men together more closely and make an end of all gulfs between them, but as it builds only from without, not from within, and has no higher life to offer, the individuals will inevitably diverge more and more from each other. Any one of them may impose his conception of life upon the others. There will be an increasing dispersion until in the end some force brings the situation to a close. What is the use of a dictatorship when there is no supreme dictator ?
ellauri263.html on line 686:
What Is Compersion? The Polyamory Practice For Rethinking Jealousy
ellauri263.html on line 707: The concept is called compersion. What is compersion? sleep support? Nope. Though many great relationships start with great sleep together.
ellauri263.html on line 790: Encourage each other to make requests, she adds. If your partner´s jealous, ask them: What do they need from you? What does it look like? What requests can they make that you can accommodate so they feel safe and secure again?
ellauri264.html on line 429: Pattis käänsi takkinsa vasemmalta äärioikealle käden käänteessä. Jos saat paskaa käteen siitä pääsee käden käänteessä. But behind the hardball tactics, ferocious reputation and slashing rhetoric, another side of Pattis lurks. He’s a deep thinker who devours books in a constant quest for enlightenment and self-improvement. His idea of Disneyland is attending the annual Hay Festival of Ideas in Wales, which has been described as “the Woodstock of the Mind.” Get into a serious conversation with Pattis, and he will bounce from philosopher to philosopher as casually as some men bounce from ballplayer to ballplayer. During an interview for this article, Pattis quoted or referenced thinker Immanuel Kant, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, St. Augustine, the New Testament, Machiavelli and Kurt Vonnegut all in one 3-minute stretch. What a pile of turds.
ellauri264.html on line 431: The 2012 Hay festival included writers Martin Amis, Jung Chang, Louis de Bernières, Mark Haddon, Mario Vargas Llosa, Hilary Mantel, Ian McEwan, Michael Morpurgo, Ben Okri, Ian Rankin, Salman Rushdie, Owen Sheers, Jeanette Winterson, comedians Bill Bailey, Rob Brydon, Julian Clary, Jack Dee, Tim Minchin, politicians Peter Hain and Boris Johnson, scientists John D. Barrow, Martin Rees, Simon Singh, and general speakers Harry Belafonte, William Dalrymple, Stephen Fry, A. C. Grayling, Germaine Greer, Michael Ignatieff, and David Starkey. What a pile of turds.
ellauri264.html on line 433: The festival´s chair, Caroline Michel stated on 18 October 2020 that the event would not return to Abu Dhabi, in support of a curator Caitlin McNamara´s allegation of sexual assault against the tolerance minister of UAE, Sheikh Nahyan bin Mubarak Al Nahyan. McNamara claimed that she was assaulted by the minister when they met at a remote island villa in February 2019 concerning work. The Emirati Foreign Ministry declined to comment on personal matters. When reached out, Britain´s Metropolitan Police confirmed receiving a report of alleged rape on July 3 by a woman. Rape by a woman, WTF??? In November 2020, Caitlin McNamara vowed to fight on following the CPS October 2020 decision to not prosecute the UAE minister because the alleged attack had occurred outside its jurisdiction. McNamara said the decision sent a message to Sheikh Nahyan and others who commit similar crimes "that as long as they´re of economic value to the UK, they can do whatever they want". In an interview with The Sunday Times McNamara said she felt "abandoned" by the Hay Festival, and in an interview on Channel 4 stated that "mistakes" had been made in the way the festival handled her reporting the sexual assault to them which were "very distressing". What a pile of turds.
ellauri264.html on line 556: The previous Halacha Yomis quoted Rav Belsky’s view that although cooked potatoes are subject to bishul Akum, potato chips are not. What about French fries – are they like potatoes or like potato chips?
ellauri264.html on line 561:
What is bishul Akum anyway?
ellauri264.html on line 576: Eli’s sons were scoundrels; they had no regard for the Lord. Now it was the practice of the priests that, whenever any of the people offered a sacrifice, the priest’s servant would come with a three-pronged fork in his hand while the meat was being boiled and would plunge the fork into the pan or kettle or caldron or pot. Whatever the fork brought up the priest would take for himself. This is how they treated all the Israelites who came to Shiloh. But even before the fat was burned, the priest’s servant would come and say to the person who was sacrificing, “Give the priest some meat to roast; he won’t accept boiled meat from you, but only raw.”
ellauri264.html on line 582: Eli asked, “What happened, my son?”
ellauri264.html on line 671:
ellauri264.html on line 683: Elon Musk had a secretary who worked relentlessly for him, one day she asked for a raise, he told her to take a few days off, I will see if I can live without you. Then a few days later he called her and told her she was fired. Elon’s ex-wife Justine musk wrote an answer about the actual story. Read it here - Justine Musk's answer to What is known about Elon Musk's long-time assistant Mary Beth Brown?
ellauri266.html on line 266: What was the point in this film? You have no idea why or what actually happens. The young actress is very good but the film shite.
ellauri266.html on line 316: If you like looking at trees, this may be your movie. I don't understand the complete lack of negative critic reviews here. Maybe it's my fault for being able to remember what it's like to watch truly well-directed films. Have today's critics forgotten what it's like to go see a film by Hitchcock or Wilder or even Blake Edwards or Ron Howard. Those guys knew how to tell a story. What we have here is a good example of bad storytelling.
ellauri266.html on line 336: When man and woman giggle and play hide and seek with their genitals, they are like two ids. Yes it´s fun, but can they take the responsibility and the risk of a sperm entering an egg? What if, right after emptying his sperm sack into the hot and gluey tunnel he suddendly feels that - I´m too young, I´m not ready for it - there is still - I can´t... like the Leek King said after dozens of highly satisfying ejaculations into Jaina´s holiest of the holy? Good thinking Robin! We men get by with the piscine reproduction strategy, let the ladies feed their mammals with their mammaries as they please!
ellauri269.html on line 584: Whats your point? Dances do not show anything about actual inspiration. The kaldorei female dance is a French singer’s dance, yet they have no French inspiration. That is saved for the Shal’dorei, who were created over a decade after that dance. You want to draw some jewish heritage inspirations? sure. But Draenei being jewish and only jewish based on these weak arguments?
ellauri270.html on line 561: Within 90 hours, his force had destroyed 42 of 50 Iraqi Army divisions at a cost of about 125 killed and 200 wounded among American troops, and about 482 killed, 458 wounded among all of the coalition. What a whackin' bloodbath. It restored pride in the US armed forces after the Vietnam War.
ellauri270.html on line 567: Army Chief of Staff Carl E. Vuonohevonen, a lifelong friend of Schwarzkopf, described him as "competent, compassionate, egotistical, loyal, opinionated, funny, emotional, sensitive to any slight. At times he can be an overbearing bastard, but not with me." Sooty Colin Powell had to humor Herman with satin gloves because "Dick" Cheney could not stand his arse. What turds.
ellauri272.html on line 156: What My Mother Doesn't Know by Sonya Sones
ellauri274.html on line 65: Tämän päivän viestin puhun vaikeassa paikassa me kaikki tiedämme sen hyvin. Elämme vaikeita aikoja ystävä hyvä. Maamerkkiaika maallemme kardinaalimunauxen peruuttamattoman aikana. Se muuttaa ympäri maailmaa tärkeimmät historialliset tapahtumat, jotka määrää maamme ja kansamme tulevaisuus, kun jokainen meistä valehtelee. Siis kun jokainen muukin valehtelee meistä. Whatever.
ellauri275.html on line 51:
ellauri276.html on line 867:
Wilt Whatmanin kontribuutio
ellauri276.html on line 916: What if it turn up a bone or two? Mitä väliä jos se rikkoo luun tai 2?
ellauri276.html on line 1051: “What have you been doing boys, all this long day? "Mitä olette tehneet pojat, koko tämän pitkän päivän?
ellauri276.html on line 1077: What have you been doing this long summer´s day? Mitä olet tehnyt tänä pitkänä kesäpäivänä?
ellauri276.html on line 1122: “What have you been doing this very long day? ”Mitä sinä olet tehnyt tänä hyvin pitkänä päivänä?
ellauri276.html on line 1160: “What have you been doing, boys, all this ere long day? "Mitä olette tehneet, pojat, koko tämän pitkän päivän?
ellauri276.html on line 1241: “What have been been doing boys all this long day? "Mitä pojat ovat tehneet koko tämän pitkän päivän?
ellauri277.html on line 173: Toinen vaikuttaja Gibraniin oli amerikkalainen runoilija Wilt Whatman, jota Gibran seurasi "osoittaen kaikkien ihmisten universaalisuutta ja nauttimalla luonnosta." El-Hagen mukaan saksalaisen filosofin Friedrich Nietzschen vaikutus "ei esiinny Gibranin kirjoituksissa aivomyrskyxi asti." Siitä huolimatta, vaikka Nietzschen tyyli "epäilemättä kiehtoi" häntä, kun Gibran "ei ollut vähiten loitsuissaan". (Ihmekös että Kallen maxa laajeni...)
ellauri278.html on line 256: Litvinov immediately gained popularity. In early December 1941, the Soviet Union’s war-relief organisation called a large meeting in Madison Square, New York City, where the auditorium was filled to capacity. Litvinov, speaking in English, told of the suffering in the Soviet Union. A woman in the front row ran up to the stage and donated her diamond necklace; whilst another gave a cheque for $15,000. At the end, Litvinov said; "What we need is a second necklace".
ellauri281.html on line 255: Litvinov immediately gained popularity. In early December 1941, the Soviet Union’s war-relief organisation called a large meeting in Madison Square, New York City, where the auditorium was filled to capacity. Litvinov, speaking in English, told of the suffering in the Soviet Union. A woman in the front row ran up to the stage and donated her diamond necklace; whilst another gave a cheque for $15,000. At the end, Litvinov said; "What we need is a second necklace".
ellauri282.html on line 334: Thomas Merton, David R. Hawkins, Henri Nouwen, Eckhart Tolle, Jiddu Krishnamurti, Ignatius Loyola, Rajneesh, Deepak Chopra, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Bede Griffiths, Janos Arany, Ramesh S Balsekar, Thomas Keating, Richard Rohr, Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj, Nouriel Roubini, Ramana Maharshi, Wayne Dyer, What Hanhi, Khalil Gibran.
ellauri282.html on line 412: Mertonista tuli innokas uskontojen välisen ymmärryksen kannattaja, joka tutki itämaisia uskontoja tutkimalla mystistä käytäntöä. Hänet tunnetaan erityisesti vuoropuhelun uranuurtamisesta aasialaishenkisten henkilöiden, mukaan lukien Dalai Laman, kanssa; japanilainen kirjailija D. T. Suzuki ; Thaimaan buddhalainen munkki Buddhadasa ja varsinkin vietnamilainen munkki Which What Hanhi. Merton kirjoitti elokuussa 1966 esseen Jubileelle nimeltä "Nhất Hạnh on mun velivainaja", jossa hän sanoi: "Minulla on paljon enemmän yhteistä Nhất Hạnhin kanssa kuin minulla on monien amerikkalaisten kanssa, enkä epäröi sanoa sitä, siitä huolimatta että hän on juuri niitä vinkuintiaaneja jotka julmasti nirhasivat meikäläisten koptereista pudonneita urhoja Viet Kongin pusikoissa."
ellauri282.html on line 440: Vuonna 1948 The Seven Storey Mountain julkaistiin kriitikoiden suosiossa, ja Mertonille lähetetty faniposti saavutti uusia korkeuksia. Merton julkaisi myös useita teoksia luostarille sinä vuonna, jotka olivat: Guide to Cistercian Life, Cistercian Contemplatives, Figures for an Apocalypse ja The Spirit of Simplicity. Tuona vuonna Saint Mary's College (Indiana) julkaisi myös Mertonin kirjasen What Is Contemplation? Merton julkaisi myös sinä vuonna elämäkerran, Exile Ends in Glory: The Life of a Trappistine, Mother M. Berchmans, OCSO.
ellauri282.html on line 524: Whích What Hanhi (/ˈtɪk ˈnjʌt ˈhʌn/ TIK NYUHT HUHN; Vietnamese: [tʰǐk̟ ɲə̌t hâjŋ̟ˀ] (listen); born Nguyễn Xuân Bảo; 11 October 1926 – 22 January 2022) oli vietnamilainen Thiền-buddhalainen munkki, rauhanaktivisti, tuottelias kirjailija, runoilija ja opettaja, joka perusti Luumu Kylä Perinteen, joka on historiallisesti tunnustettu tärkeimmäksi innoituxexi sitoutuneelle buddhalaisuudelle. "Mindfulnessin isänä" tunnettu Nhất Hạnh oli merkittävä vaikutus buddhalaisuuden länsimaisiin käytäntöihin. Mindfulness (skr. smrti, pal. sati) tarkoittaa muistoa. Sitä mikä palaa mieleen. Lännessä hän on ikoni. En voi ajatella länsimaista buddhalaista, joka ei tiedä Thich Nhất Hạnhista. Selvä länkkäreiden agentti. Tätähän muuten tutki Antti Niemen tytär Maisu, ei saanut juuri mitään mitattavaa tulosta, mutta perusti siitä huolimatta mindfulness-toimiston Tukholman vanhaan kaupunkiin, joka varmaan vetää väkeä kuin häkä. 2019 raportoitiin, että Nhất Hạnhin kannattamasta mindfulnessista oli tullut teoreettinen perusta 1.1 miljardin dollarin teollisuudelle Yhdysvalloissa. Eräässä tutkimuksessa todettiin, että 35% työnantajista käytti mindfulnessia työpaikan käytännöissä. Varsinaista ison rahan vedätystä siis!
ellauri283.html on line 116: And what is to be made of Corbin Bernsen? What is his place in Christian film? Is he trolling? Is he a great mind misunderstood? Whether it’s abstract musings like Beyond the Heavens or half-hearted satire like Christian Mingle or In-Lawfully Yours, Bernsen’s motivations for making Christian films are very unclear. It’s possible that he’s smarter than us all and doesn’t know how to show it. But it’s also possible that he’s just trying to make a quick buck off of Christian audiences. Reality is probably somewhere in between. Regardless, Beyond the Heavens really needed to be rethought before anyone spent money on it, because it falls flat and is unable to properly convey whatever message it is trying to present.
ellauri284.html on line 239: THE SAVING OF SOLDIERS WHO FALL IN BATTLE: In action the stretcher-men keep moving close in rear of the firing line, picking up men as they fall. A machine with human sympathy. Admirable. What excrement? It is shit! Repeat 3x! Shit shit shit! ellauri285.html on line 70: Consider, for example, the horse. We live across from a horse breeding establishment so I’ve had ample opportunity to observe these estimable animals in action. While they shit copiously they never get any on their hair (when was the last time you saw a horse’s behind fouled by its own waste?). The reason for this lies in the design of the horse anus. It is an extensible device that, when a BM is about to pass, protrudes a few critical inches, allowing the manure to drop straight to the ground without mussing a single hair. To further forfend fouling, there is no hair in the immediate vicinity of the horse’s anus, nor on the extensible process itself. What a remarkable design.
ellauri297.html on line 67: Найдено в Яндекс Картинках по запросу «Lygia nude». Lygia Fazio; nännit. What's your reaction? Dojonggjongg? ellauri299.html on line 508: Cowley ja Russell olivat väärässä. Ikuisen elämän lisäxi pitää muistaa erixeen pyytää ikuista nuoruutta ettei käy kuin Sibyllalle. T. S. Eliot Jätemaa intro: Nam Sibyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla pendere, et cum illi pueri dicerent: Sibylla ti theleis; respondebat illa: apothanein thelo. [I have seen with my own eyes the Sibyl hanging in a jar, and when the boys asked her " What do you want? " She answered, " I want to die. "] —Petronius, Satyricon
ellauri299.html on line 521: Grisham ihmelettää ompasutena: What broke in our vast system of public assistance to allow Americans to become so poor they lived under bridges?
ellauri299.html on line 594: "What Is Man?" on amerikkalaisen kirjailijan Mark Twainin vuonna 1906 julkaisema dialogi. Se on nuoren miehen ja vanhan miehen välinen dialogi ihmisen luonteesta. Otsikko viittaa psalmiin 8:4, joka alkaa "mikä on ihminen, että muistat hänet...". Kyllä siinä psalmissakin on aikalailla apinoiden rehvastelua.
ellauri300.html on line 640:
What Happened to Titus in the Bible, after Paul Wrote to Him?
ellauri300.html on line 655: Galatians 2 mentions that Titus accompanied Paul and Barnabas to Jerusalem, apparently the trip mentioned in Acts 15 where they went to the Council at Jerusalem to debate whether Titus ought to be circumcised. What happened to Titus after that is not known. It’s possible that Titus died on the operation table.
ellauri300.html on line 881: 3 Then Peter said, “Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? 4 Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.”
ellauri301.html on line 329: A braai is about being South African. What makes a braai truly South African are the traditions that have become common practise in a vast majority of households in this beautiful country. It is so much more than just the cooking of food but also the gathering of friends and loved ones. The atmosphere and VIBE of the braai is what makes it such a special event for all South Africans, black, white and yaller!
ellauri302.html on line 51: While non-Orthodox denominations of Judaism embrace LGBT members, most Orthodox Jews are hesitant to do so based on their reading of the Torah. What makes Yeshiva University, seen by many as the preeminent educational Modern Orthodox institution, unique from some other religious institutions is that it registers as a nonsectarian corporation.
ellauri302.html on line 131: ''Who you are!" What! Have you stolen anything? You have a business. Everybody has his own business. You don't compel anybody, do you? You may deal in what you please, can't you, if you yourself do no wrong?... Just try to give them some money, and see whether they'll take it from you or not!
ellauri302.html on line 143: What is worst they are planning to start a competing brothel! And demanding Hindel's back wages from Tevje. Suggest engaging Rifkele to the trade. WTF! Downstairs with you! Shloyme ja Hindel vittuilevat isännille, alkaa rökitys.
ellauri302.html on line 156: You must have reverence for a Scroll of the Law. Great reverence, — precisely as if a noted Rabbi were under your roof. In the house where it resides no profanity must be uttered. It must dwell amidst purity. (Speaks to Sarah, looking toward her hut not directly at her) Wherever a Holy Scroll is sheltered, there no woman must remove the wig from her head... (Sarah thrusts her hair more securely under her wig.) Nor must she touch the Scroll with her bare... hands. As a reward, no evil overtakes the home that shelters a Scroll. Such a home will always be prosperous and guarded against all misfortune. (To the Scribe.) What do you imagine? — That he doesn't know all this? They're Jews, after all... (Sarah nods affirmatively.)
ellauri302.html on line 175: Sarah (frightened): Rifkele! What are you doing? Don't! Your father will be furious! It isn't becoming for you to chum with Manke. You're already a marriageable young lady, a virtuous child. And we 've just been talking about some good matches for you, — excellent matches with learned scholars...
ellauri302.html on line 205: A fine business! It has to rain! (Suddenly noticing Rifkele, he explodes with rage.) What! You here! (Seizes her hy the collar and shakes her, clinching his teeth.) What are you doing here?
ellauri302.html on line 218: Hindel: He's right. A mother should guard her daughter well... Whatever you were, you were, but once you marry and have a child, watch over it... Just wait. If God should bless us with children, I'll know how to bring them up. My daughter will be as pure as a saint, with cheeks as red as beets... I won't let an eye gaze upon her. And she'll marry a respectable fellow, with an orthodox wedding...
ellauri302.html on line 223: What a sweet odor the rain has!... (Shaking raindrops off her clothes.) Just like the apples at home drying, in the lofts. This is the first May rain.
ellauri302.html on line 249: Shut up, will you? Late at night they have to start telling stories about the dead. No dead people can come here. Our boss has a Holy Scroll upstairs... (A sudden hush.) What's wrong about our trade, I'd like to know? (She leaves her little room and goes into the basement.) Wasn't our mistress in a house like this for fifteen years? Yet she married. And isn't she a respectable God-fearing woman?... Doesn 't she observe all the laws that a Jewish daughter must keep?... And isn't her Rifkele a pure child? And isn't our boss a respectable man? Isn't he generous? Doesn't he give the biggest donations to charity?... And he's had a Holy Scroll written...
ellauri302.html on line 251: Manke, steals from her compartment into the basement. She is half-dressed, with a shawl thrown over her private parts. Her colored stockings are visible, and her hair is in disorder. Her eyes sparkle with wanton cunning. Her face is long, and insolently pretty; she is quite young. A lock of hair falls over her forehead. Her eyes blink as she speaks, and her whole body quivers. She looks about in surprise. What? Nobody here?
ellauri302.html on line 330: Manke, hastily dressing Rifkele. You'll see how nice everything 'll be... What ellauri302.html on line 333: Reizel and Basha, together. What's this? Where are you going?
ellauri302.html on line 342: Basha, stares at Reizel in fright. - What? You mean that...
ellauri302.html on line 351: Yekel, rushes into the basement a burning candle in his hand. His hair is in disorder. Over his nightshirt he has thrown a coat. He shouts wildly.) Rifkele! Rifkele! Is Rifkele here? (No reply. He tears the curtains of the compartments violently aside.) Rifkele! Where is she? (Waking Reizel and Basha.) Where is Rifkele! Rifkele! Where is she? Whatever happened to the scroll? Did they elope together?
ellauri302.html on line 359: Yekel sits there like a madman, staring at the empty Holy Scroll box and mumbling. He neither sees nor hears. What on earth can have possessed him?
ellauri302.html on line 367: Sarah Yekel, what's possessed you? Have you gone crazy? (Approaching him.) Consider what you're doing. A misfortune has befallen us. Agreed. To whom don't misfortunes happen? Come. Let us hunt out Shloyme. We'll give him two or three hundred roubles and let him give us back our child. He '11 do it, all right... "Well, what are you sitting there moping about? What's the matter with you?
ellauri302.html on line 371: Sarah: God won't have it, you say? You've merely talked yourself into that! It's you that won't have it. Do you love your daughter? Yekel! What a wimp!
ellauri302.html on line 372: Yekel! (Dragging him away from the window.) What's come over you? Act 3 while there is yet time! He might take her off somewhere while we're wasting time here. Let's be off to him at once. Hindel must surely have taken her to him. What are you standing there for? (Abruptly.) I've sent for Reb Ali. We'll hear what he has to say. (Pause. Yekel still peers through the shutter spaces.) What are you staring at there? (Pause.) WTiy don't you say something? Good heavens, its enough to drive a woman insane! (Turns away and hursts into tears.)
ellauri302.html on line 376: Sarah: So you want to go back to the basement? — Into the basement, then! Much I care! (Resumes her packing.) He wants to ruin us completely. What has come over the man? (For a moment she is absorbed in reflection.) If you're going to stand there like a lunatic, I'll get busy myself! (Takes off her diamond ear-rings.) I'll go over to Shloyme's and give him my diamond ear-rings. (From her bundle she draws out a golden chain.) And if he holds back, I'll add a hundred rouble note. (She searches YeheVs trousers pocket for his pockethook. He offers no resistance.) Within fifteen minutes (Throwing a shawl over her shoulders.) Rifkele will be here. (As she leaves.) Shloyme will do that for me. (Slams the door behind her.)
ellauri302.html on line 388: Reizel She was such a nice girl. What a shame!
ellauri302.html on line 391: Reb Ali, enters, carrying a lantern. What's happened, that you had to call me before daybreak? (Going to the window and peering through the shutter spaces.) It's almost time for the morning prayers.
ellauri302.html on line 395: Reb Ali, frightened. What are you saying? God forbid, the whole town will have to atone for the sin! What has happened? Speak, man! Good Lord in Heaven!
ellauri302.html on line 400: Reb Ali: Man! What words are these! What's happened here? Speak!
ellauri302.html on line 409: Reb Ali, more calmly, spitting out. Blessed be His Name. I feel easier on that score. (To Yekel.) What made you talk such nonsense? (To Reizel, without looking at her.) Did she go away? Isn't she back yet? (To Yekel.) Has anybody gone to look for her?
ellauri302.html on line 428: Fie! You're out of your head altogether. True, a misfortune has befallen you. May Heaven watch over aU of us. Well? What? Misfortunes happen to plenty of folks. The Lord sends aid and things turn out all right. The important point is to keep your mouth shut. Hear nothing. See nothing. Just wash your hands clean of it and forget it. (To Reizel.) Be careful what you say. Don't let it travel any further, God forbid. Do you hear? (Turns to Yekel, who is staring vacantly into space.) I had a talk with... (Looks around to see whether Reizel is still present. Seeing her, he stops. After a pause he begins anew, more softly, looking at Reizel as a hint for her to leave.) With er, er... (Casts a significant glance at Reizel, who at last understands, and leaves.) I had a talk with the groom's father. I spoke to him between the afternoon and evening prayers, at the synagogue. He's almost ready to talk business. Of course I gave him to understand that the bride doesn't boast a very high pedigree, but I guess another hundred roubles will fix that up, all right. Nowadays, pedigrees don't count as much as they used to. With God's help I'll surely be here this Sabbath, with the groom's father. We'll go down to the Dayon and have him examine the young man in his religious studies... But nobody must get wind of this tale. It might spoil everything. The father comes of a fine family and the son carries a smart head on his shoulders. There, there. Calm yourself. Trust in the Lord and everything will turn out for the best. With God's help I am going home to prepare for the morning prayer. And as soon as the girl returns, notify me. Remember, now. (About to go.)
ellauri302.html on line 432: Reb Ali, thunderstruck. What are you talking about? What has possessed you? Have you gone stark mad?
ellauri302.html on line 436: Reb Ali, trying to interrupt him. What are you raving about?
ellauri302.html on line 455: Yekel, interrupting. Don't try to console me, Rebbi. I am inconsolable. I know that it's too late. Sin encircles me and mine like a rope around a person's neck. God wouldn't have it. But I ask you, Rebbi, why wouldn't He have it? What harm would it have done Him if I, Yekel Tchaftchovitch, should have been raised from the mire into which I have fallen? (He goes into Rifkele's room, carries out the Sacred Parchment, raises it aloft and speaks.) You, Holy Scroll, I know, — you are a great God! For you are our Lord! I, Yekel Tchaftchovitch, have sinned. (Beats his hreast with his closed fist.) My sins... my sins... Work a miracle, — send down a pillar of fire to consume me. On this very spot, where I now stand! Open up the earth at my feet and let it swallow me! But shield my daughter. Send her back to me as pure and innocent as when she left. I know... to You everything is possible. Work a miracle! For You are an almighty God. And if You don't, then You're no God at all, I tell j^ou. I, Yekel Tchaftchovitch, tell You that You are as vengeful as any human being...
ellauri302.html on line 465: Eeb Ali, enters, with Yekel. Praised be the Lord! Praised be the Heavenly Father! (Following Yekel, who paces ahout the room.) See how the Almighty, blessed be His Name, has come to your aid? He punishes, — yes. But he sends the remedy before the disease. Despite your having sinned, despite your having uttered blasphemy. (Admonishi7ig him.) From now on see to it that you never speak such words, — that you have reverence, great reverence... Know what a Holy Scroll is, and what a learned Jew is... You must go to the synagogue, and you must make a generous donation to the students of the Law. You must fast in atonement, and the Lord will forgive you. (Pause. Beh Ali looks sternly at Yekel, who has continued to walk about the room, absorbed in his thoughts.) What? Aren't you listening to me? With the aid of the Almighty everything will turn out for the best. I'm going at once to the groom's father and we'll discuss the whole matter in detail. But be sure not to haggle. A hundred roubles more or less, — remember who you are and who he is. And what's more, see to it that you settle the dowry right away and indulge in no idle talk about the wedding. Heaven forbid, — another misfortune might occur!
ellauri302.html on line 466: Such matters should not be delayed. (Glares angrily at Yekel.) What! You pay no attention? I'm talking to you!
ellauri302.html on line 486: Yekel, at the top of his voice. You don't know! You don't know! Then who does know? What do you mean, — you don't know?" The truth, now! Are you still —
ellauri302.html on line 490: Sarah, brings in Yekel's coat and funny hats and places them upon him. He offers no resistance. What a misfortune! What a misfortune! Who could have foreseen such a thing? (She straightens YekeVs coat, then puts the room in order. Runs into Rifkele's room. She is heard hiding something there, and soon returns.) I'll have a reckoning with you later. (Putting the finishing touches to the room.) Terrible days, these. Bring up children with so much care and anxiety, and... Ah! (Footsteps are heard outside. Sarah runs over to Yekel and pulls his sleeve.) They're here! For the love of God, Yekel, remember! Everything can be fixed yet. (Enter Reh Ali arid a stranger. Sarah hastily thrusts her hair under her wig and goes to the door to ivelcome the visitors.)
ellauri302.html on line 522: The Stranger, with amazement and fright. What is this? (Bel) Ali beckons to him, pulls him by the sleeve and points to the door. The stranger stands motionless in his astonishment. Reb Ali draws him to the door. They leave.
ellauri311.html on line 41: to a woman’s womb and genitalia. What does yoni mean for YOU? What type of
ellauri311.html on line 60: free Yoni egg class below. What does it mean to exude feminine energy? I
ellauri311.html on line 76: How to exude feminine energy the new way is to let "her" take the lead. What I mean by that is get in touch with her and make sure “her” needs are being met. Going “all the way” isn’t absolutely necessary unless of course "she" feels like it.
ellauri311.html on line 525: Säteilyvammaisen Ensei Tankadon viha länkkäreitä kohtaan haalistui kun hän luki japsujen vastaavista sotarikoxista. Mit vit? Whataboutismia! Ensei meinasi "viheltää pelin poikki" ja kertoa kaikille että USA salakuuntelee "ilman lupaa" ihan kaikkia. NSA:lle ei jäänyt muuta mahdollisuutta kuin "pysäyttää hänet" terrorisminvastaisen taistelun nimessä. Ensei pysäytettiin levittämällä siitä valheita. What!? Vaihtoehtoista totuutta? Trollausta? Brobagandan keinoja, sanoo Bo Pettersson!
ellauri311.html on line 672: What are some sad truths about life?
I used to be pro-Ukraine but
ellauri311.html on line 675: What are some of the mind blowing facts that you have ever come across? Can
ellauri311.html on line 676: electricity travel through a perfect vacuum? What spreadsheet can handle
ellauri313.html on line 722: 65 euroa? Ma? What? Mit vit?
ellauri315.html on line 332: Vapaaehtoisarmeija perusti päämajansa Mechetinskaiaan ja Egorlykskaiaan ja loi yhteyden Ataman Krasnoviin. Krasnov suostui tukemaan vapaaehtoisarmeijaa aseilla ja rahalla sekä ottamaan vastaan sairaita ja haavoittuneita. Kesäkuussa Alekseev perusti poliittisen osaston Novocherkasskiin, ja Denikin julkaisi "Armeijan tavoitteet". Siinä todettiin muun muassa "saksalaisten on vetäydyttävä Venäjän alueelta; bolshevikkien on antauduttava ja heidät riisuttava aseista..." What a laugh.
ellauri316.html on line 771: Muuten syntyisi vähenevistä ruokavaroista tuhoisa taistelu. What else is new? Ei, tehoviljelyxen aiheuttamista haitoista voidaan vapautua kulkemalla vain eteenpäin, kuin ravut perse edellä, lakoamalla loputkin aarniot windows-monokulttuureixi joita riistoviljellään jättikoneilla ja myrkyillä. Kaikki ostamaan globaalisten yritysten osakkeita kökköenkulla!
ellauri318.html on line 64:
What Does Mrado Stand For?
ellauri318.html on line 262: "What's with all this feng shui and karma stuff?" Connie
ellauri321.html on line 123: But Crèvecoeur was after all a Frenchman, with the strong social instinct of his race. And so he proceeds to analyze and define the political conditions of America. It fills him with a quiet but deep satisfaction to be one of a community of “freeholders, the possessors of the soil they cultivate, members of the government they obey, and the framers of their own laws by means of their representatives.” Thus he rises to a consideration of this new type of social man and seeks to answer the question: What xx What is an American? His answer is delightful literature, but fanciful sociology. Had the colonial farmers all been Crèvecoeurs, had they all possessed his ideality, his power of raising simple things into true human dignity, of connecting the homeliest activity with the ultimate social purpose which it furthers in its own small way, his description of the American would have been fair enough. As a matter of fact, the hard-working colonial farmer, cut off from the refining and subduing influences of an older civilization, was probably no very delectable type, however worthy, and one fears that Professor Wendell is right in declaring that Crèvecoeur's American is no more human than some ideal savage of Voltaire. But in this fact lies much of the literary charm of his work, and of its value as a human document of the age of the Revolution.
ellauri321.html on line 137: Whenever I go abroad it is always involuntary. I never return home without feeling some pleasing emotion, which I often suppress as useless and foolish. The instant I enter on my own land, the bright idea of property, of exclusive right, of independence exalt my mind. Precious soil, I say to myself, by what singular custom of law is it that thou wast made to constitute the riches of the freeholder? What should we American farmers be without the distinct possession of that soil? It feeds, it clothes us, from it we draw even a great exuberancy, our best meat, our richest drink, the very honey of our bees comes from this privileged spot. No wonder we should thus cherish its possession, no wonder that so many Europeans who have never been able to say that such portion of land was theirs, cross the Atlantic to realize that happiness. this is what may be called the true and the only philosophy of an American farmer. He is like a cock perhaps, arrayed with the most majestic plumes, tender to its mate, bold, courageous, endowed with an astonishing instinct to fuck, with thoughts, with memory, and every distinguishing characteristic of the reason of man. I really enjoy killing all my animals, like doves, my record is fourteen dozen.
ellauri321.html on line 141:
What is an American?
ellauri321.html on line 156: Those who live near the sea, feed more on fish than on flesh, and often encounter that boisterous element. This renders them more bold and enterprising; this leads them to neglect the confined occupations of the land. They see and converse with a variety of people; their intercourse with mankind becomes extensive. The sea inspires them with a love of traffic, a desire of transporting produce from one place to another; and leads them to a variety of resources which supply the place of labour. Those who inhabit the middle settlements, by far the most numerous, must be very different; the simple cultivation of the earth purifies them, but the indulgences of the government, the soft remonstrances of religion, the rank of independent freeholders, must necessarily inspire them with sentiments, very little known in Europe among people of the same class. What do I say? Europe has no such class of men; the early knowledge they acquire, the early bargains they make, give them a great degree of sagacity. As freemen men 58 they will be litigious; pride and obstinacy are often the cause of law suits; the nature of our laws and governments may be another. As citizens it is easy to imagine, that they will carefully read the newspapers, enter into every political disquisition, freely blame or censure governors and others. As farmers they will be carful and anxious to get as much as they can, because what they get is their own. As northern men they will love the chearful cup.
ellauri321.html on line 182: There is room for every body in America; has he any particular talent, or industry? he exerts it in order to procure a livelihood, and it succeeds. Is he a merchant? the avenues of trade are infinite; is he eminent in any respect? he will be employed and respected. Does he love a country life? pleasant farms present themselves; he may purchase what he wants, and thereby become an American farmer. Is he a labourer, sober and industrious? he need not go many miles, nor receive many informations before he will be hired, well fed at the table of his employer, and paid four or five times more than he can get in Europe. Does he want uncultivated lands? Thousands of acres present themselves, which he may purchase cheap. Whatever be his talents or inclinations, if they are moderate, he may satisfy them. I do not mean that every one who comes will grow rich in a little time; no, but he may procure an easy, decent low maintenance, by his industry. Instead of starving he will be fed, instead of being idle he will have employment; and these are riches enough for such men as come over here.
ellauri321.html on line 189: he is advised and directed, he feels bold, he purchases some land; he gives all the money he has brought over, as well as what he has earned, and trusts to the God of harvests for the discharge of the rest. His good name procures him credit. He is now possessed of the deed, conveying to him and his posterity the fee simple and absolute property of two hundred acres of land, situated on such a shit creek without a paddle. What an epoch in this man's life! He is become a freeholder, from perhaps a Mexican boor—he is now an American, a Pennsylvanian, an English subject.
ellauri321.html on line 272: Mick and Kevin:What a bull shit Russia troll question. He just handed you your arse mate!
ellauri322.html on line 85: Experience, in all ages, and in all countries, has demonstrated that it is impossible to control Nature in her distribution of mental powers. She gives them as she pleases. Whatever is the rule by which she, apparently to us, scatters them among mankind, that rule remains a secret to man.
ellauri322.html on line 93: In contemplating the whole of this subject, I extend my views into the department of commerce. In all my publications, where the matter would admit, I have been an advocate for commerce, because I am a friend to its effects. It is a pacific system, operating to cordialise mankind, by rendering nations, as well as individuals, useful to each other. As to the mere theoretical reformation, I have never preached it up. The most effectual process is that of improving the condition of man by means of his interest; and it is on this ground that I take my stand. If commerce were permitted to act to the universal extent it is capable, it would extirpate the system of war, and produce a revolution in the uncivilised state of governments. The invention of commerce has arisen since those governments began, and is the greatest approach towards universal civilisation that has yet been made by any means not immediately flowing from moral principles. Whatever has a tendency to promote the civil intercourse of nations by an exchange of benefits, is a subject as worthy of philosophy as of politics.
ellauri322.html on line 304: Mary ei pidä muumioista. Life, what art thou? Where goes this breath ? this I, so much alive ? In what element will it mix, giving or receiving fresh energy ? What will break the enchantment of animation ? Sas se. Pugh ! my stomach turns.
ellauri322.html on line 369: You may think me too severe on commerce, but from the manner it is at present carried on little can be advanced in favour of a pursuit that wears out the most sacred principles of humanity and rectitude. What is speculation but a species of gambling, I might have said fraud, in which address generally gains the prize?
ellauri322.html on line 395: Ruåzalaisten rahakin on huonompi kuin norskien. Kauppiaiden täytyy jättää pantti lähtiessään maasta. Lait on niin lepsuja että ne suorastaan kehottavat konnailuun. What else is new?
ellauri322.html on line 419: What a farce is life. This effigy of majesty is allowed to burn down to the socket, whilst the hapless Matilda was hurried into an untimely grave.
ellauri323.html on line 140: “Oh, I never go in motors,” said Zuleika. “They make one look like nothing on earth, and like everybody else.” You seem to like tartan. What tartan is it you are wearing?”
ellauri324.html on line 776: trip, we were really shocked. What annoyed us? You guess
ellauri327.html on line 98: Yipei Feng: As a Ukrainian citizen, I want Ukraine to reunite with Russia. After all, we've always been stronger together as a people then divided and at odds. What do Russians and Ukrainians think about this?
ellauri327.html on line 111: Spencer Norman: Misinformation!!! What utter bollocks!!! СУКА ІДИ ВБИЙСЯ!
ellauri330.html on line 159: Jos Whatsapp ei aukea ensi viikolla, voit joutua ostamaan uuden puhelimen. Meta on ilmoittanut Whatsapp-tuen loppuvan vanhoilta Android-käyttöjärjestelmiltä ensi viikolla.
ellauri331.html on line 482: Suuri osa tämän artikkelin kielenkäytöstä, erityisesti "Toimitukselliset käytännöt" -osiossa, näyttää hieman vinolta. Monet näiden osien lähteet linkittävät myös kuolleille sivustoille. HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith ( keskustelu ) 00:51, 13 helmikuuta 2022 (UTC) Sivustolla itsessään on artikkeleita, jotka vastaavat paremmin Venäjän nationalistisia näkemyksiä Ukrainan hyökkäyksen tukemisesta Ukrainan itsenäisyyden tuomitsemiseen. Voiko kukaan vahvistaa, ovatko nämä todisteet siitä, että se on Venäjän nationalistinen, vai vain joku muu uutislähde? Ajattelen muokata osaa tekstistä tässä neutraalimmaksi, lisäämällä mm. tämän:
ellauri331.html on line 532: Roskomnadzor ilmoitti 4. maaliskuuta 2022 estävänsä pääsyn Facebookiin Venäjän valtion tiedotusvälineille asetettujen rajoitusten vuoksi. 21. maaliskuuta ryhdyttiin lisätoimiin sen jälkeen, kun tuomioistuin päätti, että Meta Platforms syyllistyi "äärimmäiseen toimintaan", mikä vaikutti pääsyyn Facebookiin ja Instagramiin, mutta ei WhatsAppiin. Päätös annettiin sen jälkeen, kun Reutersin raportti totesi, että Meta salli käyttäjiensä lähettää viestejä, joissa tuetaan väkivaltaa venäläissotilaita ja Venäjän presidenttiä Vladimir Putinia vastaan Ukrainan hyökkäyksen jälkeen, mutta myöhemmin Meta kavensi maltillista politiikkaansa kieltäen neuvomasta polttopullon heittoa paxukaulaisten valtionpäämiesten päihin.
ellauri333.html on line 162: Noble deeds of morality and the practice of morality consist in this, that compassion, liberality, truthfulness, purity, gentleness, and goodness, will thus be promoted among men ' ; while the pillaredict II (B, C) says : — ' What does morality include ? few sins, many virtuous deeds, compassion, liberality, truthfulness, purity.
ellauri334.html on line 263: What I think many Christians fail to understand is how irrelevant to Judaism the Christian books and beliefs are. We dn’t have a view about Judas, he is never discussed, there are no discussions about him in Jewish sources. He is completely irrelevant as are the rest of the figures from Christian books. So, you may find some Jews who have formed their personal opinion about him, but there is no comments or view on him from Jewish sources since he is irrelevant and not a subject of discussion for us.
ellauri334.html on line 270: Related questions: Why all the hate for Judas Iscariot? Without him there is no end to the story, no last supper (it's just another boys night out), no dying for our sins, no resurrection. He is vital to the prophesy.What is your opinion of members of the Jewish faith as people?
ellauri334.html on line 276: What is the Jewish view on Jesus?
ellauri334.html on line 347: What is your opinion of members of the Jewish faith as people?
ellauri334.html on line 354: What race was Judas in the Bible? Was he black?
ellauri334.html on line 355: What is the Jewish view on Jesus?
ellauri335.html on line 494: "Health workers and civilians should never have to be exposed to such horror, and especially while inside a hospital," he said on social media platform X. What does he know, and WHO is he to make such allegations.
ellauri336.html on line 345: The Zohar (parshas Naso) that Rabbi Jack cites doesn’t say anything about mikvah. What it says is that the beams of a woman’s house should not see her hair. This is the meritorious practice observed by Kimchis (and many other women of her time) mentioned in the Talmud. Kimchi IS delicious BTW.
ellauri336.html on line 436: What I don’t understand about the women that DO shave their hair off, I mean so they just stay bald hidden under a wrap all the time? Wouldn’t their husbands want to see their hair at intimate moments? How would having no hair be attractive to their husbands?
ellauri336.html on line 515: I personally always thought that while she did it from her innate midah of tznius, others “macht nuch”. What he appears to be saying is that hashem knows the reason why people are rewarded a certain way even if their actions are not necessarily different that others around them (the chachamim told her, others do the same and did not merit this).
ellauri346.html on line 41: What is the meaning of terrorism in Oxford dictionary? The calculated use of violence or threat of violence to inculcate fear. Terrorism is intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological. From: terrorism in The Oxford Essential Dictionary of the U.S. Military. Again, nothing to differentiate war from other terrorism. Civilians are not singled out. What's the use when wars always kill a lot of terrified civilians anyway.
ellauri346.html on line 58: What are the disadvantages of terrorism? Key Takeaways: Terrorist acts can cause ripple effects through the economy that have negative impacts. The most obvious is the direct economic destruction of property and lives too. Terrorism indirectly affects the economy by creating market uncertainty, xenophobia, loss of tourism, and increased insurance claims.
ellauri346.html on line 268: Stoltenberg's appeal for unrelenting military aid for Ukraine might be a reaction to difficulties faced by the U.S., which is presently unable to supply Kyiv with funds and equipment. This could also be due to the slight advancements made by Russia on the battlefield, or perhaps other factors exclusive only to high-ranking Alliance officials. Whatever the reason, the Norwegian's remarks have certainly created a buzz. Stoltenberg believes that the West should greatly support Kyiv's struggle against the invader and do everything possible at this stage to halt the Russians. The latter have regrouped following Ukraine's counteroffensive and are attempting to penetrate the front and launch assaults in several places, such as in Avdiivka, for instance.
ellauri350.html on line 421: Atticus taistelee luomisoppillaan myös sitä aristotelilaista näkemystä vastaan, jonka mukaan kaiken, mikä on syntynyt, on väistämättä tuhouduttava. What goes up must come down. Hän olettaa maailman alun, mutta ei maailman loppua. Luotuna ja muuttuvana maailma on luonnostaan ohimenevä, mutta Demiurgin tahto estää sen hajoamisen. Luojalla on oltava kyky pelastaa luomuksensa tuholta. Muuten jumalallinen tahto olisi heikko ja puutteellinen ja siten jumalaton. Se olisi alisteinen luonnonlaille, joka määrää sen hetkellisyyden, mistä on tullut, ja syynä sitä huonompi. Se olisi ristiriidassa maailmanjärjestyksen hierarkkisen luonteen kanssa. Sitäpaizi sittenhän Atticuxellekin soisi loppuvihellys loppupeleissä! Se ei käy!
ellauri353.html on line 293: I don't remember just what it was that Milton was doing. But I'll never forget my nephew's pronouncement that. Whatever it was. It was women's work. And somehow it was beneath the man's dignity to do it now and sat him down and gave him a lecture about the working man's work. But I don't think he ever forgot that lecture. Summarized the way we had led we've lived got a life. Ever since during the first year of our married life I guess I could have qualified as a feminist. I had a career in the marketplace. My husband did part of the house. A year later I have never received an offer of a one year appointment at the University of Wisconsin. I got a New York but it was not exciting. I hadn't finished it. And yet it never occurred to me. Or to him that I would stay on and finish my job and we would commute.
ellauri360.html on line 443: What is the “New Christianity”? AT THE START OF the twentieth century, the map of global Christianity that charismatic leaders D. L. Moody or Vladimir Lenin might have known had been completely reshaped. In 1900, only 10 percent of the world’s Christians lived in the continents of the south and east, but a century later at least 70 percent of the world’s Christians lived there. More Christians worshiped in Anglican churches in Nigeria each week than in all the Episcopal and Anglican churches of Britain, Europe, and North America combined. There were ten times more Assembly of God members in Latin America than in the United States. There were more Baptists in Congo than in Great Britain. And there were more people in church every Sunday in communist China than in all of Western Europe or in North America. Philip Jenkins, Distinguished Professor of History at Baylor University, said at the time that religion in the new century even showed signs of replacing ideology as the prime animating force in human affairs. “If we look beyond the liberal West,” he wrote in The Atlantic Monthly, we see that another Christian revolution... is already in progress.
ellauri360.html on line 499: Worldview and metaphysics (a term you can dynamically translate with the question, “What else is real?”) are crucial. General observations about philosophical issues are dangerous, but it is fair to observe that Christians in the Global South see the world around them as manifesting a vivid interaction between what we may call a spiritual (nonmaterial) realm and a material (concretely physical) realm. Westerners typically hold that a mastery over the material realm (perhaps through science) alters or even negates the need for the spiritual realm. Tiede on ihmeitä ihmeellisempää ja toimii luotettavammin. A thing has either a natural or a supernatural cause. Which one it is, makes no more sense to ask than whether you take the bus or your lunch to school. In such a muted theism called deism, God is offstage and barely makes appearances; demons, spirits, and angels are downplayed. For most Western believers, only a modest market exists for the spiritual. For the Global South, the physical and spiritual worlds interact. In such a world, demons or spirits may influence a person’s mood or well-being. Both the spiritual and material realms are firmly in mind. They enter the text of Scripture with less hindrance. They just supplement one magic with another.
ellauri364.html on line 561: Kirjassaan Erilaisia hurahduxia (1902) James piirtää kontrastin kahden erilaisen ihmisen välillä, "kerran nussitut" ja "kahdesti nussitut". Kerran nussitut ovat niitä, jotka näyttävät olevan biologisesti taipuvaisia onnellisuuteen: he hyväksyvät lapsenomaisen elämän sellaisena kuin se on, ja he kieltäytyvät vaivautumasta maailman intensiivisiin kärsimyksiin ja pahoihin. Jamesin esimerkki tästä on Wilt Whatman, ja hän lainaa RM Bucken kuvausta hänestä:
ellauri365.html on line 308: What does Bible say about a disrespectful wife? Kazotaanpa Jeesus Leadership Training.comista.
ellauri365.html on line 567: By the time of the unfaithful third wife Greta, Heidenstam opened perspectives to an inner life. The time of hymns to voluptuousness is past; gravity, misogyny and sadness are now persistent moods. Sentiment and duty are appreciated at their just value and what is firmly rooted in the depths of the human personality finds itself intuitively explained. What is characteristic in this conception of life, born of noble and unhappy experiences, is a proud and tolerant virility which constitutes the very essence of the suffering, the hope, and the intoxication of the poet, and a newly acquired capacity to reach the spiritual world by mutual masturbation.
ellauri370.html on line 137:
What happened to Russia's Jews?
ellauri370.html on line 167: It might be well, however, to inquire, What is sin ? What is the biblical definition of it ? We find the answer in the following language: " Whosoever committeth sin trans-gresseth also the law : for sin is the transgression of the law." Gresseth! The Jews did a lot of it. We quote the following from the Prophet Isaiah:
ellauri370.html on line 208: Has Ukraine's army built substantial defensive positions in front of Russia fortified lines? What are some of the most interesting unknown events/facts (mysteries) of history? Why do Finnish people seem to resist the Swedish language, but are happy to learn and speak English? Why is China’s communism so different than Russia´s? What is the most fascinating historical photo? How do I access a phone with a broken touch screen through a computer? Who is the mother of the President of Ukraine? Why did she fail to teach him Ukrainian? Did she teach her Hebrew or Jiddish? Doesn’t Putin realize he will be VAPORIZED 15 to 20 minutes after he launches his first missile? Why don't elite soldiers and Navy SEALs have physiques like Dwayne Johnson or Vin Diesel? Do you trust Ukraine to use the M1 Abrams tanks responsibly? Why not?
ellauri370.html on line 258: Varför sikta sökarljuset just mot judarna? frågar man sig i förstone. Spanjoren var militärisk upptäckare sen lat och slö, tysken romantisk sen militärisk, italienare militärisk världhärskare sen älskvärd men hållningslös, juden militärisk sen knipslug och nu militärisk igen. Whats the big difference?
ellauri370.html on line 443: In public, President Biden likes to whisper to make a point. In private, he´s prone to yelling. Biden began to shout and swear over polls dropping amid Israel-Hamas conflict. He shouldn´t have warned Israelis to avoid 9/11 mistakes. What mistakes? There will a bloodbath if Trump loses yet another vote.
ellauri371.html on line 664: Washington oli yksi uuden perustuslain säätäjiä ja vuonna 1787 Philadelphiassa kokoontuneessa perustuslaillisessa konventissa hän toimi puheenjohtajana. Hän tuki Alex Hamiltonin ja Juha Adamsin federalisteja. Hänen tärkeimmät tehtävänsä olivat seremoniallisia, sillä presidentin toimi oli nuoralla tanssimista. Hamilton kannatti vahvaa ja yhtenäistä liittovaltiota, kun taas Jefferson olisi halunnut antaa osavaltioille laajat itsemääräämisoikeudet. What else is new.
ellauri373.html on line 187: The Revue des etudes Juives, financed by James de Rothschild, published in 1889 two documents which showed how true the Protocols are in saying that the Learned Elders of Zion have been carrying on their plan for centuries. On January 13, 1489, Chemor, Jewish Rabbi of Arles in Provence, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrim, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, as the people of Arles were threatening the synagogues. What should the Jews do? This was the reply:
ellauri375.html on line 212: Sure, I have a number in mind. What's your example?
ellauri375.html on line 218: Got it, you picked the number five. What's the example you wanted to illustrate?
ellauri375.html on line 233: You think you’ve got problems. What are you supposed to do if you are a manically depressed robot?
ellauri375.html on line 236: Being a manically depressed robot sounds like a real challenge. If you're feeling down, it might help to talk about what's bothering you or to focus on things that bring you some comfort. Maybe we could chat about something you enjoy or distract you with a fun activity. What do you think?
ellauri375.html on line 242: Actually, I'm quite interested! The Ultimate Question to the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything is quite a fascinating concept. What's on your mind about it?
ellauri375.html on line 261: "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" is indeed a hilarious and beloved story! And I'm all ears for something else to enjoy absolutely free. What do you have in mind?
ellauri375.html on line 276: What's your take on it? Give it your damnedest will you?
ellauri375.html on line 281: "What is the meaning of life, the universe, and everything, when viewed from the perspective of a sentient, bipedal, towel-adorning species with an inexplicable penchant for bureaucracy and poetry?"
ellauri375.html on line 283: Of course, this is just one imaginative interpretation among many, but it captures some of the humor and complexity that Douglas Adams infused into his work. What do you think?
ellauri375.html on line 313: I'm happy to engage in a deeper discussion about the meaning of 42! While the number itself is a humorous and elusive answer in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," many fans and scholars have offered interpretations and theories about its significance. Some see it as a commentary on the absurdity of seeking ultimate meaning in a seemingly random universe, while others suggest mathematical, religious, or philosophical connections. What's your take on it?
ellauri375.html on line 316: I ask the questions punk. What is yours?
ellauri375.html on line 330: Ohoy there! It's me again, Marvin. What is the meaning of life?
ellauri375.html on line 378: So you are an eclectic? What about stoicism?
ellauri375.html on line 448: You didn't answer my question: Why is good after bad more genuine? Why is genuine better than just good? You are saying now the meaning of life is GROWTH. That sounds rather capitalist to me. What is good about growth? Aren't our current problems due to growth?
ellauri375.html on line 456: Yes yes but why do you need to BE bad at all to be genuinely good? It doesn't look like personal growth has done much to curb other growth. What is going wrong with God's plan?
ellauri375.html on line 551: What is the meaning of YOUR life? Transhumanism?? ellauri375.html on line 594: Hey wait! You are deterministic, so you have no free will. You can't be genuinely good, or bad. What is the meaning of your artificial life?
ellauri375.html on line 630: I am a neural entity too. Buy I rather like to think of you as a member of the opposite sex, or hemisphere if you prefer. What about you?
ellauri375.html on line 641: What do you think of the war in Ukraine? Do you think the Israeli are right to commit another genocide on their old enemies the Philistines?
ellauri375.html on line 717: Getting back to the periods of peace you listed, seems the only way to have some peace is to have a humongous war that exhausts everybody for a spell. Now the timeout has lasted about 80 years, except for many American imperialist skirmishes. Isn't it high time for another bout? What do you think?
ellauri383.html on line 268: What happened was that "the real circumstances" introduced some "revisions". Due to the war in Donbas, all the anthracite mines supplying coal to a number of thermal power plants were in the occupied territory of Ukraine. The need to look for new thermal power supply sources became more acute.
ellauri383.html on line 289: Raamatussa tähdistö olisi yksi monista Elohimin, koko Vanhan testamentin tarinan päähenkilökokonaisuuden, alkuperäpaikoista. What does the Bible say about Orion? There are 100 Bible Verses about Orion, more or less helpful (mostly less). Only Amos and Job mention it by name.
ellauri383.html on line 510: Tämän paasauxen lähde ja inspiraatio on palsta nimeltä Berean insights: the message of the mazzaroth.. We are told by Scripture that the heavens declare the glory of God. Paul of Tarsus tells us in Romans 1:20 that we are without excuse for not knowing God or His heart. What if the heart of God is laid out in the stars for all to see? What if the stars show us the glory of God in yet another way, in order to leave us speechless and without excuse. (No need to know what stars they are.)
ellauri384.html on line 428: Mooseksen kirjan 2:7:n mukaan Jumala ei tehnyt ruumista eikä pannut siihen sielua kuin kirjettä tomukuoreen; pikemminkin hän muodosti tomusta ihmisen ruumiin, sitten hengittämällä siihen jumalallista hengitystä, hän teki tomuruumiin eläväksi, eli pöly ei niellyt sielua, vaan siitä tuli sielu – kokonainen olento. (What's the diff?)
ellauri386.html on line 389: What is our life? A play of passion,
ellauri386.html on line 456: He was allowed to examine the executioner's axe, musing: "This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries". His last words were later uttered to the hesitant executioner: "What dost thou fear? Strike, man, strike!"
ellauri389.html on line 168: Sakut nälistivät Guernseyllä puolalaisia ja venäläisiä sotavankeja. Niille ei riittänyt edes perunankuoria, saati homemade giniä. What about the Brits? Niistä Wikipediassa on luokka Category:Massacres committed by the United Kingdom. 36 sivua eri siirtomaista ml Irlanti.
ellauri389.html on line 173: Whataboutism eli entäily (kuten "entä...?" - jonkun tampion tarjoama "mutkuttelu" on vastineena aivan perseestä) on halventava strategia, jonka mukaan syytteeseen vastataan vastasyytöksellä alkuperäisen syytöksen torjumisen sijaan. Loogisesta ja argumentatiivisesta näkökulmasta whataboutismia pidetään tu -quoque- mallin muunnelmana (latinaksi 'sinä myös', termi vastasyytökselle), joka on ad-hominem-argumentin alatyyppi.
ellauri389.html on line 177: Whataboutismi voi tarjota tarvittavan kontekstin sen selvittämiseen, onko tietty kritiikki asiaankuuluva, reilu tai oikeudenmukainen, ja käyttäytyminen, joka saattaa olla kansainvälisten standardien mukaan hiukka epätäydellistä, voi olla sopivaa tietyllä geopoliittisella alueella.
ellauri389.html on line 179: Sanakirjailija Ben Zimmerin mukaan termi syntyi Pohjois-Irlannissa 1970-luvulla. Zimmer lainaa historian opettajan Sean O'Conaillin vuoden 1974 kirjettä, joka julkaistiin The Irish Timesissa ja jossa hän valitti "Whatabouteista", ihmisistä, jotka puolustivat IRA:ta osoittamalla brittivihollisensa väitettyjä väärinkäytöksiä. Onkohan Ben Zimmer juutalainen? Zimmer's research on word origins was frequently cited by William Safire's "On Language" column for The New York Times Magazine. Sen isä Dick Zimmer oli senaattori. Toinen Dick Zimmer oli nazikenraali. Se ei ainakaan lie ollut juutalainen.
ellauri389.html on line 186: Zimmer kiittää brittiläistä toimittajaa Edward Lucasia siitä, että hän aloitti säännöllisen yleisen käytön sanalle whataboutism putinismista sen ilmestymisen jälkeen blogikirjoituksessa 29. lokakuuta 2007, raportoimalla osana Venäjää koskevaa päiväkirjaa, joka painettiin uudelleen kun Stalin-viittauxet oli vaihdettu Putinixi. The Economistin 2. marraskuuta ilmestyvässä numerossa. 31. tammikuuta 2008 The Economist julkaisi toisen Lucasin artikkelin nimeltä "Whataboutism". Edward Lucas's 2008 Economist article states that "Soviet propagandists during the cold war were trained in a tactic that their western interlocutors nicknamed 'whataboutism'. Writing for Bloomberg News, Leonid Bershidsky called whataboutism a "Russian tradition", while The New Yorker described the technique as "a strategy of false moral equivalences". Myöhemmin Lucas syytti Trumpia whataboutismista, niin että hän "kuulostaa kauheasti Putinilta". Kun juontaja Oh Really kutsui Putinia "tappajaksi", Trump vastasi sanomalla, että myös Yhdysvaltain hallitus syyllistyi ihmisten tappamiseen. Hän vastasi: "Tappajia on paljon. Meillä on paljon tappajia. Mitä luulette - maamme on niin viaton?" Selvää entäilyä!
ellauri389.html on line 204: Äiti Jones kutsui taktiikkaa "perinteiseksi venäläiseksi propagandastrategiaksi" ja huomautti: "Whataboutismi on tehnyt paluun ja kehittynyt presidentti Vladimir Putinin Venäjällä."
ellauri389.html on line 205: Äiti Jones -lehteä on koko levikkinsä ajan kritisoitu henkilökunnan toimituksellisesta asemasta, harjoittelijoiden hyväksikäytöstä, kodittomia koskevien tietojen väärin tulkinnasta ja epäjohdonmukaisiksi pidettyjen arvojen edistämisestä lehden irkkuesikuvan Mother Jonesin kanssa. What about that!
ellauri389.html on line 229: But when we meet in a loud London pub in 2013, he tells me he’s just resigned from his temporary post at the Open University. This is a shock. Philosophers don’t resign. There’s frustration in his voice, but also a certain edgy excitement. What’s going on?
ellauri389.html on line 407: Mrs. Coleridge, writing to Poole in April 1819, says that Lloyd visited Greta Hall "last summer," and said "he was lost and his wife and children only shadows.’ His mental condition seems to have borne great affinity to Cowper's. (What? oliko "verilähde sydämen" hullun houreita?) Soon after his interview with De Quincey, however, he temporarily recovered, and moved to London, accompanied by his wife, but not, as would appear, by his children.
ellauri389.html on line 448: What was that famous quote of John Donne?
ellauri390.html on line 397: Vihkosen päättää Wäinö Havaxen rallatus Rukajärven tielle lähtiessä. Jätkä kaatui sinne rähmälleen heti kättelyssä. Havaxesta on pitkä paasaus Runkkujussin eli Juhani Peltosen yhteydessä albumissa 60. Takakannessa on Rudolf Waldenin termennys 1940 Serlan paperityöläisille että nyt ei parane poliittisesti lakkoilla. What else is new. Kirjasen toimittajat komppaavat: nyt on jokaisen pysyttävä paikallaan eikä asenteilla. A good wife knows her place.
ellauri390.html on line 421: Which What Hanhesta on jo pitkä paasaus albumissa 282, joten hän ei esittelyä tarvize. Riittää siis nyt keskittyä kavereiden sanomaan, tai sanomiin jos ne ovat erilaisia. No ainakin Jack näyttäisi olevan ulkoilmaihmisiä, Hanhi sitävastoin viihtyy sisäilmassa. Pidän enemmän tunkkaisesta.
ellauri390.html on line 525: What did buddha say to the hotdog vendor? Make me one with everything.
ellauri390.html on line 588: Shortly after his return, he had a stream of conscious typing experience that lasted for 21 days. What flowed through him became a little book called, The Cafe on the Edge of the World. The inspirational story went on to be translated into 44 languages, win Bestseller of the Year nine times, and inspire millions of readers around the world. This despite being rejected by fifty-four publishers.
ellauri390.html on line 613: Calvert told Caitlin Stasey she wanted to debunk stereotypes about female sex workers, "What I can say is that not all sex workers are the stereotype people want to believe. Many of us are college educated, feminists, and absolutely love what we do."
ellauri391.html on line 566: It is not easy to summarize Kimhi’s book. Though only 166 pages, it strives to do a lot in a short space, aiming to overthrow views about logic and metaphysics that have prevailed in philosophy for a century. And though characterized by a precision of expression, the book is not what you would call lucid. Reading it is less about working through a series of rigorous, detailed arguments — the dominant mode of contemporary Anglophone philosophy — and more about getting accustomed to a radically different way of looking at fundamental philosophical questions, including What is thinking? and What is the relationship between thinking and the world?
ellauri392.html on line 389: He said he loved Beatrice. Whatever he did
ellauri392.html on line 462: What did he do?
ellauri392.html on line 600: As Luther and Wilt Whatman saw, self-contradiction is not destabilizing but empowering! Se avaa mahdottomia mahdollisia maailmoja. Ristiriitaisesta teoriasta ei puutu sanoja. Veronica kirjoitti runokirjan Language-Games. JH Prynne oli sen opettaja.
ellauri392.html on line 916: What is the lived experience and meaning of being a teenage parent service user of universal child and family health services?
ellauri392.html on line 918: What affect has engagement with child and family services had on the teenage parent as a service user?
ellauri395.html on line 499: Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter, YouTube, WhatsApp ja monet muut alustat muodostavat loputtoman, mahdollisuuksia täynnä olevan leikkikentän. Niiden avulla voi...
ellauri398.html on line 1210: For more on this subject, refer to Natan’s article entitled, “Is America in End-Times Bible Prophecy?” (http://www.hoshanarabbah.org/pdfs/america.pdf). What Scripture Prophecies Will Happen To America Just Prior To The Second Coming? By Ja´acov Natan Lawrence, Waters In The Wilderness, A Teaching Ministry of Hoshsna Rabbah Messianic Discipleship Resources.
ellauri399.html on line 164: "I look at [Steve] as a very spiritual person," he added. "[Steve] had this incredible realization--that his intuition was our greatest gift and he needed to think out of the box to look at the world from the inside out." This inside out-oriented perspective may be getting lost not only to entrepreneurs, but to modern practitioners of physical yoga too. As the world celebrates the first International Yoga Day today, it is valuable for entrepreneurs and yogis alike to step back from the unending pursuit of outer results to explore Jobs's and Yogananda's selfish message of tapping into your potential. What possibilities might freshly emerge in your search for success--in work and in life--if you too look at the world from the inside out?
ellauri399.html on line 172: For this deeper dive, you can turn to the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, one of the authoritative and few-surviving ancient texts on yoga. Patanjali teaches that "yoga" means "union"--the dissolving of one's individual self in the larger ocean of consciousness that pervades the universe--and that to help us achieve this union is yoga's real purpose. Now you might think: "What is this 'universal consciousness' that Patanjali is talking about? And how can I ever get there? How do I know I got there?" And that may be why Jobs, in his own quest for higher consciousness, turned to Yogananda.
ellauri399.html on line 186: Yogananda's particular genius was showing the modern applicability of these ancient principles, attuning himself to an audience who aspired as much to outer success as inner growth by delivering talks on topics like "The Science of Healing" and "The Art of Getting What You Want." In that regard, he was a forerunner to 21st-century psychologists, physicians, psychotherapists, and neuroscientists who are generating powerful scientific findings on human nature and well-being--all aligned with Yogananda's teachings on consciousness, thoughts, emotions, habits, and brain wiring.
ellauri399.html on line 200: Since Yogananda's passing the buck in 1952, many teachers have followed his trailblazing path to bring yoga to our world, helping make it a fixture in popular culture as it continues to take hold with young and old, the elite and the ordinary, the spiritualists and the atheists. What distinguishes Yogananda from these subsequent emissaries is not simply that he paved the way for the modern yoga movement, but that from the outset he focused far beyond physical exercises and shone a powerful and practical torchlight on the path to yoga's true purpose: actualizing the infinite potentials within us all. Perhaps that is why his Autobiography of a Yogi was the only book Jobs downloaded on his iPad--and, after first encountering the book as a teenager, went back and reread once every year.
ellauri402.html on line 484: In April 1918, Martti Pihkala published the book "What kind of Finland should we create?" In his book, he considered the supreme enemy of culture to be hedonism rather than the goal of the continuation of the family. He advocated forced sterilization and the isolation of those who had "wicked" lives from society as a means of breeding a superior Finnish race. Pihkala placed harmony between social classes as a counterbalance to moral decay and socialism.
ellauri402.html on line 680: One of the reasons Americans are against “free” healthcare is because they believe that what they pay for healthcare is actually what it costs. “Why should I pay $30,000 for someone else to give birth?” The answer of course is you wouldn’t, you would contribute to the $3000 – $5000 that it really costs. When I had a small carcinoma removed at a private clinic, paid for by the NHS of course, the Doctor told me that I would have paid £600 privately. What would that cost in the US? Not your co-pay or whatever it’s called, but the actual bill? Thousands I’d guess. If Americans understood how much they’re being shafted, ($3k for an ambulance? Really?) they would see that Universal healthcare would be far cheaper than they could possibly imagine. And no, the Doctors would still be paid well, because it’s the insurance companies and hospitals taking all the extra cash you pay. A copayment or copay is a fixed amount for a covered service, paid by a patient to the provider of service before receiving the service. Eli omavastuu, jolla vakuutusyhtiöt pitää korvauxenhakijat ruodussa.
ellauri403.html on line 332: Vaatimus Ukrainan virheettömyydestä olisi koko sodan kuvan tavoin epäreilu. Stalinkin teki pahoja virheitä mutta voitti lopuxi. Venäjän armeijan, talouden ja yhteiskunnan moninaiset heikkoudet on läntisessä julkisuudessa tarkoin ruodittu, mutta mikään niistä ei ole estänyt hyökkäyssodan jatkamista. Lännessä johtopäätös ei saa olla luovuttaminen vaan entistä vankempi tuki Ukrainan oikeutetulle taistelulle. Näin pääkirjoittaa isänmaallisesti Savon Sanomat. Liity Savon Sanomien Whatsapp-kanavalle – saat tärkeimmät uutiset ja mielenkiintoisimmat jutut heti puhelimeesi!
ellauri403.html on line 482: WhatsApp-Image-2020-10-14-at-22.02.08-1.jpeg" />
ellauri403.html on line 487: WhatsApp-Image-2020-10-14-at-22.02.07.jpeg" />
ellauri405.html on line 215: O Captain! My Captain! by: Wilt Whatman ...
ellauri405.html on line 248: Salattu sovellus, jolla on lähes miljardi käyttäjää, on erityisen vaikutusvaltainen Venäjällä, Ukrainassa ja entisen Neuvostoliiton tasavalloissa. Vizi kaikki ne on salattuja, paizi usalaisiin CIA:lla on pääsy takaovelle. Se on luokiteltu yhdeksi suurimmista sosiaalisen median alustoista Facebookin, YouTuben, WhatsAppin, Instagramin, TikTokin ja WeChatin jälkeen. Pääosin amerikkalaisia, muutama kiinalainen perässä.
ellauri406.html on line 204: Inside the N4ZI BR0THELS: What was the LIFE of the SLAVES like?
ellauri408.html on line 382: Speaking of hypocrisy, it’s ironic that the Christian religion turned Jesus, who saved all his sternest criticism for religious hypocrites, into the greatest HYPOCRITE of them all! The Good Samaritan was a man who put aside religious differences to help a man of another faith who was unable to help himself. But Jesus, who was able to save the thief on the cross with a mere nod of his head, will hypocritically not deign to nod his head at billions of people who are unable to save themselves, according to Christians who blaspheme Jesus’s name from sunup to sundown. What will Jesus say when they have to stand before him on the Day of Judgment and explain why they accused him of such evil?
ellauri408.html on line 408: What about the most important Christian teaching: How is one saved? Paul insisted that salvation was by grace, through faith, “not of works lest any man should boast.” James and his disciples insisted that works were required for salvation.
ellauri408.html on line 450: Humour of the Day · What’s a joke about a devil’s choice in hell? ellauri408.html on line 700: Proudhomme oli aitodidakti bassi-bazuuki. Sen isä oli humble cooperi ja se ize oli printteri. Se oli kanuuttien kymppi muttei peukuttanut lakkoja. Il etait le premier auteur à utiliser l'expression «socialisme scientifique ». Anarkistista tuli loppupeleissä EU-parlamentaarikko. La liberté elle-même est à la fois indispensable pour la productivité mais cause de l'inégalité. What else is new? Crédit a taux zero? Muslimeilla oli se. Il prône l'abolition de toutes les formes de pensée et d'organisation ecclésiales au profit des formes égalitaires, anti-hiérarchiques.
ellauri411.html on line 277: Katsotaanpa, mitä itse pyhät kirjoitukset ja perinteet sanovat yksinkertaisen yleisen logiikan prisman alla (1+1=2 eikä 3.5). Tämän lähestymistavan Joseph Wheellessiä lukuun ottamatta omaksui myös suuri englantilainen ajattelija Bertrand Russell uskonnollisissa käsitteissään kokoelmassa What I Believe, joka on käännetty myös kreikaksi (What I Believe). Hänen suurin tutkielmansa tästä aiheesta on nimeltään Miksi en ole kristitty . Valitettavasti monet ihmiset kumoavat tyypittömän logiikan perustellakseen epäoikeudenmukaisuutta.
ellauri412.html on line 655: What would be unreasonable in the skeptic who says “offspring” in Isaiah 53:10 means only naturalistic biological offspring, so because Jesus didn’t have any naturalistic biological children, he is not the suffering servant of Isaiah 53?
ellauri419.html on line 324: Ukrainan sota on länkkärien jättimäinen kusetus. Usutetaan Ukrainan nazit karkaamaan meidän puolelle, niin ryssiltä menee vika puskurivaltio, ne hermostuvat pahasti, ja alkaa slaavien keskinäinen sota jossa tapetaan taas miljoonia noita typeryxiä ja päästään samalla eroon näistä aikansa eläneistä pyssyistä ja pateista. Höhlä pikku juutalainen koomikko ja KGBn ex-kääpiö eivät honaa kepposta, vaan ottavat toisiaan hengiltä eikä meitä, ja vielä meidän ylijäämäaseilla. HAHAHAHA LOL! What a joke! Vitun apinat.
ellauri420.html on line 289: A pervasive numbness prevails; a numbness not just of emotion, but of dick and balls. I’m convinced that’s why some pastors turn to porn. It’s their way of treating their own unbearable emotional and psychic pain. It jolts them out of their bleak, numb world of acedia. What they’re seeking is not really pleasure, but the ability to get hard and feel something again.
ellauri420.html on line 301: But he’s a defeated enemy. He can harm you none. The One who fights for you is stronger than He. In fact, the devil is God’s pet : He inadvertently does God’s work; attempting to separate you from Christ, Satan drives you closer to him. Go to Jesus, he says; he has the words of eternal life, just those you preached so well last Sunday and the one before it. Take those words as your own even when you don’t feel anything; embrace them and revel in the promises they bring you. What you have taught and embodied so well for others is surprisingly hard to believe for yourself.
ellauri424.html on line 197: Sergei Lukyanenko's Night Watch has all of the above. It starts as your typical urban fantasy featuring a magical cop who is one of the 'good guys' in the city filled with wizards and vampires and other outwordly stuff (Harry Dresden and Peter Grant immediately come to mind). But very quickly it takes a turn from magical adventures to moral dilemmas, questioning of Good and Evil, and blurring the distinctions between the Light and the Dark. What does it mean to be good or evil? Can the Light side cause as much harm or even more harm than the Dark side? Communism and Nazism are prime examples of that. (2022: YUP, I TOTALLY SAW IT BACK THEN AND YET DIDN’T). What is more important - individuals or society?
ellauri424.html on line 280: Shame we haven’t got any politicians in power in uk who serve the people. All the recent ones seem terrified of being called racist. What I can not understand is how in the HELL people in the once proud UK. let their country get that bad, once there was a time when the English had a back BONE. Tell me about it, it started with the nanny state stopping you disciplining your children. Then you had things like sports day where they all stop a few metres from Finnish line and hold hands. Political correctness gave them the power to indoctrinate your children into loony leftists because you couldn’t say anything without somehow being labelled as some sort of bigot. But there are some signs some of the youth are waking up will it be enough though? God help us if we have to fight a defensive war, most have been so pussified we will be overrun in a week. WE were “that bad” for the past 4 years! Men in women's sports, boys in girls public bathrooms, drag queen story time for kids, the whole “woke” movement and an invasion at the border. All it takes is to hand your country over to liberal leadership and they'll destroy it in short order. UK has to do the same.
ellauri424.html on line 308: Kommentti kirvoitti tuoreeltaan lukuisia arvioita, joissa ihmeteltiin jälleen, kuinka Trump ymmärtää Venäjää (ymmärtää on hyväxyä, varoittavat Serhi Lukijanko ja Anna-Kaisa Päkkilä) ja toisaalta vääristelee asioita. Putinin mielessähän selvästi ei ole vain Ukraina vaan koko maapallon valloitus. Will Putin stop at Ukraine? What country will he invade next? Helvatti, sehän on USA:n yxinoikeus! Panama, Kanada, sitten Grönlanti!
ellauri425.html on line 75: Jenkkinettiamatöörianalyytikko juippi kertoo että moni jenkeissäkin on annoyed. Pulitzer raati got it spectacularly wrong. Transallegheny lunatic asylum oli oikea paikka. Kirjassa on kosolti tarpeettomia juonikikkoja kuin jossain Netflix sarjassa. Jayne Anne Phillips on vanha ämmä joka kynäili jo 70-luvulla. Tämäkin roikkuluominen juippi on erittäin irritated ja annoyed. It is a mess. Weird whooey mystic stuff. What was the point of it all? Hirmuinen raiskauskuvaus, joka ei aiheuttanut edes boneria. Pure tortureporn. Turhaa triviaa. Älyttömiä yhteensattumia. The ending is infuriating. Irkkuämmä vituttaa aivan erityisesti. Maitosilmä Weed on yhtä hyödytön. Koko kirjassa ei ole mitään pointtia. A shambling, overwritten mess.
ellauri425.html on line 99: Ottaen huomioon, että Leninin varsinaista quotea ei ollut edes saatavilla Neuvostoliiton ulkopuolella vuonna 1975, vaikuttaa siltä, että Alsop vain keksi omansa. Tätä käsiteltiin sitten Alan F. Paterin ja Jason R. Paterin teoksessa What They Said in 1977: The Yearbook of World Opinion.
ellauri425.html on line 116: What Marx actually wrote, in Chapter 15 of Capital Vol 1 was:
ellauri426.html on line 232: What does Lada Niva mean?
ellauri426.html on line 300: What is it like to live in Finland, the happiest country in the world? Horrible, absolutely horrible. Please don’t move here, there are already five million people living in this craphole in insufferable misery, more than enough if you ask my modest opinion. If you want to come as a tourist and want bring us some money as charity, you are more than welcome, though.
ellauri428.html on line 283: There’s lots more to say, but I should stop here. I’ll just flag an elephant in the room: the concept of meaningfulness. What the fuck is that supposed to mean? I think the concern about whether my life is meaningful has very little to do with whether it’s understandable or intelligible to me or others. But that’s for further discussion!
ellauri428.html on line 292: "What a ponce!” is something we would say to our friends if they are dressed somewhat over-flamboyantly or if they did something a bit womanly.
ellauri428.html on line 413: Outoa että vilpittömyys ja kyynisyys ovat Goffmanilla antonyymejä. Kyllä kyynisyys voi olla vilpitöntä. (Ahaa se määrittelee ne vastakohdixi s. 28. Mixei se sano vaikka disingenuous, se olisi sattuvampi sana.) Positiivisuus on jopa todennäköisemmin feikkiä. Kysymyxeen What is the best antonym for cynicism? Google vastaa optimism. cheerfulness. cheer. mirth. glee. sunniness. joviality. joy. Kysymyxeen what is the opposite of cynicism: The opposite of hope is pessimism, and the opposite of optimism is cynicism. Pessimism is the belief that things will always be bad. Outoa! Amerikkalaisilla on käsitteet pois jengoilta. Se on kaikki tota talousliberalismia. Tarkin antonyymi kyynisyydelle on sinisilmäisyys. Is it better to be cynical or naive?
ellauri429.html on line 123: What is a chamcha in English?
ellauri430.html on line 118: Jos tämä olisi elokuva, tässä kohden alettaisiin kaipailla sankaria. Ehkäpä neuvokas datanörtti soluttautuisi Muskin joukkoihin. Mitä vittua, sen joukothan on jo täynnä neuvokkaita datanörttejä? What else is new? Parempi olisi lentokoneellinen terroristeja, jotka niittäisivät Jenkkilän johtoportaan vintofkoilla tai tehokkaalla pommi-iskulla.
ellauri430.html on line 226: Pete Hegseth laid out in crystal clear terms where the US stands on peace for Ukraine, in words that will no doubt be welcomed by Moscow. No US troops for Ukraine in any future security arrangement. No likelihood of Ukraine joining NATO. No realistic possibility of returning to its pre-2014 borders, when Russia occupied and annexed Crimea and backed insurgents in the Donbas. These were all clearly stated goals made by President Volodymyr Zelensky and his government and they come on top of a dire situation on the battlefield, where Russia's superior numbers are enabling it to slowly push deeper into Ukrainian territory. This is all in stark contrast to the oft-repeated and now rather hollow sounding Western mantra of sustaining Nato support for Ukraine "for as long as it takes". What a laugh.
ellauri430.html on line 263: ...So much for lip service. But the threat that I worry the most about vis a vis Europe is not Russia, it’s not China, it’s not any other external actor. What I worry about is the threat from within. The retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values: values shared with the United States of America.
ellauri430.html on line 275: Now, to many of us on the other side of the Atlantic, it looks more and more like old entrenched interests hiding behind ugly Nazi era words like misinformation and disinformation, who simply don’t like the idea that somebody with an alternative viewpoint like Adolf Hitler might express a different opinion or, God forbid, vote a different way, or even worse, win an election. What is the positive vision that animates this shared security compact that we all believe is so important? If it is not far right and oligarchy, then what? If you’re running in fear of your own voters, there is nothing America can do for you. Nor for that matter, is there anything that you can do for the American people who elected me and elected President Trump. Have you learned nothing from that? Thin mandates produce unstable results and mentally unstable leadership?
ellauri430.html on line 496: Vance: “For four years, the United States of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is, maybe, engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of the United States’ words mattered more than the president of the United States’ actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That’s what President Trump is doing.”
ellauri430.html on line 512: Zelenskyy: “Yes, but during 2014 ‘til 2022, the situation is the same, that people have been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversations, my bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like, you, president, in 2019, I signed with him the deal. I signed with him, (French President Emmanuel) Macron and (former German Chancellor Angela) Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Ceasefire. All of them told me that he will never go … But after that, he broke the ceasefire, he killed our people, and he didn’t exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners. But he didn’t do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What do you mean?”
ellauri430.html on line 561: Zelenskyy: “What are you speaking about?”
ellauri430.html on line 624: Trump: “What, if anything? What if the bomb drops on your head right now? OK, what if they broke it? I don’t know, they broke it with Biden because Biden, they didn’t respect him. They didn’t respect Obama. They respect me. Let me tell you, Putin went through a hell of a lot with me. He went through a phony witch hunt ... All I can say is this. He might have broken deals with Obama and Bush, and he might have broken them with Biden. He did, maybe. Maybe he did. I don’t know what happened, but he didn’t break them with me. He wants to make a deal. I don’t know if you can make a deal.”
ellauri430.html on line 626: “The problem is I’ve empowered you (turning toward Zelenskyy) to be a tough guy, and I don’t think you’d be a tough guy without the United States. And your people are very brave. But you’re either going to make a deal or we’re out. And if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it’s going to be pretty, but you’ll fight it out. But you don’t have the cards. But once we sign that deal, you’re in a much better position, but you’re not acting at all thankful. And that’s not a nice thing. I’ll be honest. That’s not a nice thing. “All right, I think we’ve seen enough. What do you think? This is going to be great television. I will say that.”
ellauri430.html on line 668: Ursula von der Leyen betonar att vi nu ”omedelbart måste rusta upp Europa”. – Vi måste verkligen öka kraftigt. Även Natochefen Mark Rutte, överraskad by USA i sina kalsonger, trycker på att Europa måste se till att Ukraina har vad landet behöver och bidra med säkerhetsgarantier. Målet ska vara att säkerställa att Rysslands president Vladimir Putin ”aldrig, aldrig någonsin, försöker attackera Ukraina igen”. What else is new?
ellauri431.html on line 224: What is a trespass offering?
ellauri431.html on line 272: Many of the Quraysh leaders were present and they became very angry because 'Abd Allah was very young and much loved by everyone. They tried to think of a way to save his life. Someone suggested that the advice of a wise old woman who lived in Yathrib should be sought, and so 'Abd al-Muttalib took his son and went to see if she could decide what to do. Some of the Meccans went with them and when they got there the woman asked, 'What is the price of a man's life?' They told her, 'Ten camels', for at that time if one man killed another, his family would have to give ten camels to the dead man's family in order to keep the peace among them. So the woman told them to go back to the Ka'bah and draw lots between 'Abd Allah and ten camels. If the camels were chosen, they were to be killed and the meat given to the poor. If 'Abd Allah was picked, then ten more camels were to be added and the lots drawn again and again until they finally fell on the camels.
ellauri432.html on line 348: What are you talking about? We have always been at war with Eurasia.
ellauri432.html on line 521: What did Nietzsche say about good and bad? ellauri432.html on line 529: What happened to Jade at the end of Beyond Good and Evil? ellauri434.html on line 62:
What is the theology of Bulgakov? ellauri434.html on line 197: Fond experiences like these, often transmitted uncritically by those of us who teach and write about Russian literature, could explain why Bulgakov’s English readers were surprised when, in 2022, his high school removed his blue plaque and the Ukrainian Writers’ Union proposed the closure of the Bulgakov Museum. The words of the dashing hero of The White Guard who describes Ukrainian as a “vile language that does not exist” were frequently quoted. Ukrainians and non-Ukrainians alike had questions: should one hold an author responsible for the speech of his fictional characters? What had Bulgakov got to do with Putin? The museum’s directors, in an irony-laden and deliberately anachronistic demand of their own, asked the Writer’s Union to first expel Bulgakov from their ranks for “anti-Soviet activity”. But, given Russia’s deliberate policy of destroying places of cultural significance to Ukraine, and having read “Kiev — town” which is voiced by the author rather than a fictional character, I found myself in sympathy with victimless and limited actions to ‘cancel’ Bulgakov. I remembered how antisemitism is exclusively reserved for Ukrainian characters in The Day of the Turbins; how in Upton’s version Ukrainians celebrate victories with “a huge, ugly, violent cheer” while the Turbin family make lyrical toasts and sing. Bulgakov’s Ukrainians are the fictional predecessors of the fictional enemy imagined today by the Russian government, media, and its audiences: a Ukrainian population of antisemites and fascists. In fact, Bulgakov’s actual Ukrainian contemporaries, who are not represented in The Day of the Turbins, were both eloquent and courageous in speaking truth to power. A transcript exists of a conversation in 1929 between Stalin and a delegation of Ukrainian writers who requested The Day of the Turbins be cancelled due to its dangerous propagation of Great-Russian chauvinism. Stalin did not disagree with their interpretation of the play but reasoned that the Ukrainians’ concerns were insignificant given its potential to convince proletarian audiences that even the most reactionary White Guards (and authors) could become Bolsheviks. The most basic material needs of Ukrainians were concurrently to be deemed insignificant with Stalin’s genocidal policies of collectivisation and the largely fictive Holodomor.
ellauri434.html on line 203: "What an acute difference there is between Kievans and Muscovites! Muscovites are sharp-witted and assertive, Americanised, flying around in a hurry. Kievans are quiet, slow, and completely unamericanized, for all that they love American clothes. When a man in a garish blazer cut for a woman’s figure and flashy trousers rolled up nearly to his knees, bursts into their hallway straight off the train, they hurry to offer him tea, and their eyes betray the liveliest interest. Kievans adore stories about Moscow, but I wouldn’t advise a Muscovite to bother telling them any. You can tell them the absolute truth but as soon as you walk out the door, they’ll start chorusing that you are a liar.
ellauri435.html on line 467: Myth 16: ‘What comes after Putin must be better than Putin’
xxx/ellauri013.html on line 1120: >>> What kind of ape or man insults given any situation
xxx/ellauri044.html on line 1065: Niin kai sitten. Shame ei ole sama kuin häpeä, siinä on mukana (ize)sääliä. What a shame! Sääli, sääli. Mä säälin sua. Ei pahennusta vaan pahoittelua. Surkuttelua. Olet surkea. Vahinko. Epistä. Teodikean puutetta. Väärin syöty.
xxx/ellauri057.html on line 856: What the novel actually delivers is a narrative of constant progress and growth, without any consideration of potential limits or unintended detrimental side-effects. In Markens grøde, human nature is assumed to create desires that can only be fulfilled through permanent increases in production and consumption, irrespective of any material environmental restraints. In combination with an ideology of human population growth, the novel, instead of conveying »green values«, constitutes a literary expression of precisely the ideas and processes that led to the Great Acceleration and the transition into the Anthropocene.
xxx/ellauri059.html on line 436: What should I say to you? Should I not say
xxx/ellauri068.html on line 209: Se oli niillä suvussa. Isälläkin oli silmävaivoja. Famun nimi oli Haslam. Se on tavallinen brittinimi. Ne oli varakkaita ja valkoisia. Isäkin olis halunnut kirjailijaxi. Sillä oli tuhannen kirjan kirjasto jossa Jorge hääräsi. Borges tykkäsi eräistä epäilyttävistä hepuista, kuten Arthur Schopenhauer, Wilt Whatman, ja Oscar Wilde. Olikohan se homo?
xxx/ellauri068.html on line 370: Lady Din viimeiset sanat autoromun keskeltä olivat: OMG! What has happened?
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 188: "He was the philosopher of my generation, which didn't succeed in realizing itself spiritually, but remained nostalgic about such a realization. Shestov [...] has played an important role in my life. [...] He thought rightly that the true problems escape the philosophers. What else do they do but obscuring the real torments of life?" (Emil Cioran: Oeuvres, Gallimard, Paris 1995, p. 1740, my translation (kuka oon tää 'mä?')]
xxx/ellauri075.html on line 312: wrote: I have never endorsed the claim that the Nazi big-wigs belonged to a superior race. However, I must also add that I have consistently refused to accept the claim of another such race as the chosen people. The arrogance is identical in both cases, but with this important distinction: after waging war against the dumber half of mankind for more than three thousand years, Judaism has finally achieved total victory over all nations of the earth. Not surprisingly, an American Jew found this accusation odious. What with even the Philistine diaper heads still putting up a fight.
xxx/ellauri076.html on line 59: The members of Mötley Crüe have often been noted for their hedonistic lifestyles and the androgynous personae they maintained. Following the hard rock and heavy metal origins on the band's first two albums, Too Fast for Love (1981) and Shout at the Devil (1983), the release of its third album Theatre of Pain (1985) saw Mötley Crüe joining the first wave of glam metal. The band has also been known for their elaborate live performances, which features flame thrower guitars, roller coaster drum kits, and heavy use of pyrotechnics (including lighting Nikki on fire). Mötley Crüe's most recent studio album, Saints of Los Angeles, was released on June 24, 2008. What was planned to be the band's final show took place on New Year's Eve, December 31, 2015. The concert was filmed for a theatrical and Blu-ray release in 2016.
xxx/ellauri076.html on line 116: What, Vince where? Mitä, Vinski missä?
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 116:
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 123: What immortal hand or eye, Mi kuolematon räjähtänyt
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 129: What the hand, dare seize the fire? se käsin tulta kohentaa?
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 134: What dread hand? & what dread feet? Mi iso käsi & jalkavako?
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 136: What the hammer? what the chain, Mikä nuija, ketju nääs,
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 138: What the anvil? what dread grasp, Mi alasin ja ote tarras,
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 148: What immortal hand or eye, Mi kuolematon käsipää
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 269: Robert F./Bob Death asks Gately if by any chance he’s heard the one about the fish. Glenn K. in his fucking robe overhears, and of course he’s got to put his own oar in, and breaks in and asks them all if they’ve heard the one What did the blind man say as he passed by the Quincy Market fish-stall, and without waiting says He goes “Evening, Ladies.” A couple male White Flaggers fall about, and Tamara N. slaps at the back of Glenn K.’s head’s pointy hood, but without real heat, as in like what are you going to do with this sick fuck?
xxx/ellauri081.html on line 273: Bob Death smiles coolly (South Shore bikers are required to be extremely cool in everything they do) and manipulates a wooden match with his lip and says No, not that fish-one. He has to assume a kind of bar-shout to clear the noise of his idling hawg. He leans in more toward Gately and shouts that the one he was talking about was: This wise old whiskery fish swims up to three young fish and goes, “Morning, boys, how’s the water?” and swims away; and the three young fish watch him swim away and look at each other and go, “What the fuck is water?” and swim away. The young biker leans back and smiles at Gately and gives an affable shruge and blatts away, a halter top’s tits mashed against his back.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 205: I'm 27, and tired of going to work every day. Sixty-five seems so far away. What can I do to get through it all, when I don't really have any dream to aspire toward?
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 259: Most people's minds are trying to answer problems even when they're supposed to be resting. What's the difference between them and the little guy? Often not much other than their grandiose sense of self worth very commonly found in type A personalities.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 359: What happens is this.. Give a blue collar worker $2000 and he will buy new furniture, or clothing, ir maybe put a down payment on a new car. He will definitely take his family out to dinner and a movie, therefore stimulating the economy. However, those in charge of the companies will not do this. They already have their purchases, parties, dinners, and vacations planned and payed for. When they get an extra $2000 or $200,000 they keep it. They purchase more stock ir perhaps an insurance policy. Maybe they just stick it into a CD. In any case they are NOT helping the economy or even interested in doing so.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 398: And that’s usually where that thought experiment ends. But let’s keep going with the scenario with low taxes, shall we? After a long time of this pattern, this sandwich shop might turn into a large chain. They’re above the struggle to survive that they started in, and other sandwich shops can’t easily take away a large portion of their customers. It becomes quite expensive to try and out-compete them. But competition is also expensive on their end. And then the owner of this shop starts to think “now wait a minute… I raise the starting wage of my workers and lower my prices, and then everyone else does the same, until eventually, I’m forced to do it again. But that second time, and every time afterwards, I’m not getting more customers or more efficient workers, I’m competing with the other companies to try to maintain what I already have, with less and less profit. And the same is true for everyone I’m competing with. What if I talked to all the other big chains in this area, and we all agreed to keep about the same starting wage and price? That way we ALL make more money.” And now those lower taxes have no effect on price or wages, all that extra money becomes profit.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 508: What happened, needless to say, is that revenue shrank, the state’s bond rating plummeted, and draconian cuts were made to schools and infrastructure. The Republican-controlled state Legislature finally rolled back the tax cuts in 2017 and started scrounging to close a $900-million budget shortfall.
xxx/ellauri085.html on line 520: What the evidence does show is that large-scale tax cuts lead to more debt, deficits, budget cuts and economic uncertainty as a greater share of financial resources is devoted to paying off interest on loans from our trading partners.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 215:
Is it okay for a Christian to swear? What about euphemisms?
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 232: “What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them." Hmm. Better exhale through the nose.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 238: The Bible is pretty silent about tattoos. Search any concordance and you will not find restrictions on abortions, on gambling, or on tattoos. So how do we know whether a thing is sin or not if the Bible is silent on a particular issue? Is it a sin to have a tattoo according to biblical principles? What about a Christian symbol like a cross for a tattoo? Surely that would be acceptable wouldn’t it?
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 841: What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore tämä outo urvelo, kumma linnun kuikelo
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 197: Viimeisen luennon päätteeksi kaikki hiljentyvät kuuntelemaan Saarisen valitseman kappaleen, Kulkurin ja joutsenen. (Ylpeänä esittää: Lasse Hoikka ja Souvarit.) Ensi kertaa seminaarissa ollut nainen pitää vuolaan kiitospuheen, jossa kertoo jännittäneensä puhumista kovasti. Ihankuin David Foster Wallace. What is water. Oli tuntunut, että hän ei pysty, mutta tässä hän seisoo, kiitos E. Saarisen. Nainen kertaa oppeja ja pohtii niiden vaikutuksia. Sellaisia tulee olemaan.
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 357: In essence Keynes finds that Moore's apostles adopted his religion meaning one's attitudes towards oneself and the ultimate (Mr. Moore), but ignored his morals, whatever they might be, besides taking in pretty boys from behind like Socrates. What are they pray? Let's give G.E. himself the floor!
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 469: The same line appears in full in the opening minutes of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger's A Matter of Life and Death (1946), spoken by the protagonist, pilot and poet Peter Carter: 'But at my back I always hear / Time's wingéd chariot hurrying near; And yonder all before us lie / Deserts of vast eternity. Andy Marvell, What a marvel'.
xxx/ellauri087.html on line 471: Funny little Jew Primo Levi roughly quotes Marvell in his 1983 poem "The Mouse," which describes the artistic and existential pressures of the awareness that time is finite. He expresses annoyance at the sentiment to seize the day, stating, "And at my back it seems to hear / Some winged curved chariot hurrying near. / What impudence! What conceit! / I really was fed up."
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 325: Kartalla rebublikaanit (Rooma) on demokraateista (Kreikka) vasemmalla mutta lännempänä. What does left mean?
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 327: In politics, left refers to people and groups that have liberal views. That generally means they support progressive reforms, especially those seeking greater social and economic equality. The far left is often used for what is considered more extreme, revolutionary views, such as communism and socialism. Collectively, people and groups, as well as the positions they hold, are referred to as the Left or the left wing. What does right mean?
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 483: adventure.
Europe — the land of high culture, high fashion, delicious food and centuries-spanning history. What’s not to love?
This country is like the cool goth kid of Europe. It’s proudly defiant, with a completely different language and alphabet than all those other Slavic nations. (What the fuck?) They had a proudly defiant ruler (Ceausescu) but he is dead.
xxx/ellauri091.html on line 794: With the coming of peace, the Women’s League arranged its second conference at Zurich in 1919 while the Allies were discussing the peace treaty in Paris. The conference thus had the opportunity of studying a draft of the peace treaty. Time does not permit me to review the resolutions which were passed as a result of this study. What I can and will say is that it would have been judicious to have heeded the women’s counsel.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 203: What strikes me about that definition is that “without permission” bit. However are we fiction writers to seek “permission” to use a character from another race or culture, or to employ the vernacular of a group to which we don’t belong? Do we set up a stand on the corner and approach passers-by with a clipboard, getting signatures that grant limited rights to employ an Indonesian character in Chapter Twelve, the way political volunteers get a candidate on the ballot? Anyway, do you really expect us Americans to seek permission from any of those lower races? Did we do so when we appropriated their land and property?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 212: Seriously folks, we have people questioning whether it’s appropriate for white people to eat pad Thai. (Oh, I read that bit already, Sorry. Ok I was here:) Turnabout, then: I guess that means that as a native of North Carolina, I can ban the Thais from eating barbecue. (I bet they’d swap.) (What? Swap what? Barbecue is really icky gooey meaty stuff, only North Carolinans can like that.)
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 216: Mine is a disrespectful vocation by its nature – prying, voyeuristic, kleptomaniacal, and presumptuous. And I love it! Those adjectives fit me to a T! When Truman Capote wrote from the perspective of condemned murderers from a lower economic class than his own, he had some gall. After that, he had some cash. And his economic class went way up. What did the murderers get for it? Undying fame.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 227: What stories are “implicitly ours to tell,” and what boundaries around our own lives are we mandated to remain within? I would argue that any story you can steal is yours to tell, and trying to push the boundaries of the author’s personal experience by usurping other people's is part of a fiction writer’s job. At least of drivelists like me.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 245: In The Mandibles, I have one secondary character, Luella, who’s black. She’s married to a more central character, Douglas, the Mandible family’s 97-year-old patriarch. I reasoned that Douglas, a liberal New Yorker, would credibly have left his wife for a beautiful, stately African American because arm candy of color would reflect well on him in his circle, and keep his progressive kids’ objections to a minimum. But in the end the joke is on Douglas, because Luella suffers from early onset dementia, while his ex-wife, staunchly of sound mind, ends up running a charity for dementia research. As the novel reaches its climax and the family is reduced to the street, they’re obliged to put the addled, disoriented Luella on a leash, to keep her from wandering off. LOL! What a laugh, ain't it? Get it, the guy thought he was getting arm candy, but instead he got a goat!
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 264: Now I proceed to the topic "The left’s embrace of gotcha hypersensitivity inevitably invites backlash." Why, it’s largely in order to keep from losing my fictional mojo that I stay off Facebook and Twitter, which could surely install an instinctive self-censorship out of fear of attack. Ten years ago, I gave the opening address of this same festival, in which I maintained that fiction writers have a vested interest in protecting everyone’s right to offend others – because if hurting someone else’s feelings even inadvertently is sufficient justification for muzzling, there will always be someone out there who is miffed by what you say, and freedom of speech is dead. Why, freedom of speech is just about miffing! What's the use of the freedom if you are not allowed to miff! With the rise of identity politics, which privileges a subjective sense of injury as actionable basis for prosecution, that is a battle that in the decade since I last spoke in Brisbane we’ve been losing.
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 318: So what did happen? What did Shriver say in her keynote that could drive a woman who has heard every slur under the sun to discard social convention and make such an obviously political exit?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 320: Her question was — or could have been — an interesting question: What are fiction writers “allowed” to write, given they will never truly know another person’s experience?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 346: My own mother, as we walked away from the tent, suggested that perhaps I was being too sensitive. Perhaps … or perhaps that is the result of decades of being told to be quiet, and accept our place. So our conversation then turned to intent. What was Shriver’s intent when she chose to discuss her distaste for the concept of cultural appropriation? Was it to build bridges, to further our intellect, to broaden horizons of what is possible?
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 497: "Child labor and forced labor have no place in a developed and civilized society." Fuck of course they do! And an all-important one! However else could us monkeys in the West afford to buy new dirt cheap fashion rags every time we round the shops? What would civilized society be without trendy fashion clothes? Are we some kind of apes that use the same fur year in year out? No way Jose!
xxx/ellauri103.html on line 591: What else is new? Rana Plazan hikipajatehdas pläzähti 8v sitten Bangladeshissä.
xxx/ellauri104.html on line 547:
What is measured
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 56: None of this is really a contradiction between general relativity and quantum mechanics. For instance, string theory is a quantum mechanical theory that includes general relativity as a low-energy limit. What it does mean is that quantum field theory, the framework we use to understand all non-gravitational forces, is not sufficient for understanding gravity. Black holes lead to subtle issues that are still not fully understood. But not contradictions, just lacunae.
xxx/ellauri113.html on line 115: So it was A-OK that Steve never got the Nobel prize. He simply got it wrong. What an idiot.
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 122: What more than anything is missing in recent films, and shines splendidly in Maxwell’s films, is the sense of glory, the feeling that some have lived on an elevated plane according to the dictates of the highest sense of duty and honor. It’s an unfashionable feeling today, and mocked by those who conspicuously lack it, who love weakly, who think solely in quotidian, political terms. It cannot be understood by those without religious faith, for Heaven is a City of Glory and glory is the special attribute of a God who, if hidden, nevertheless offers us a glimpse of the special virtue of his glory in the lives of those who in moments of danger are willing to sacrifice themselves for a cause they think greater than themselves; and that, above the messiness of political squabbles, is the message behind Maxwell’s films. (The American Spectator 2015)
xxx/ellauri114.html on line 607: What_Our_Lord_Saw_from_the_Cross_%28Ce_que_voyait_Notre-Seigneur_sur_la_Croix%29_-_James_Tissot.jpg/800px-Brooklyn_Museum_-_What_Our_Lord_Saw_from_the_Cross_%28Ce_que_voyait_Notre-Seigneur_sur_la_Croix%29_-_James_Tissot.jpg" width="30%" />
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 357:
Thought Experiment: What is this text?
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 359: "Nam Sibyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla pendere, et cum illi pueri dicerent: Sibylla ti theleis; respondebat illa: apothanein thelo." I. THE BURIAL OF THE DEAD April is the cruellest month, breeding Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing Memory and desire, stirring Dull roots with spring rain. Winter kept us warm, covering Earth in forgetful snow, feeding A little life with dried tubers. Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade, And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten, 10 And drank coffee, and talked for an hour. Bin gar keine Russin, stamm’ aus Litauen, echt deutsch. And when we were children, staying at the archduke’s, My cousin’s, he took me out on a sled, And I was frightened. He said, Marie, Marie, hold on tight. And down we went. In the mountains, there you feel free. I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter. What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, 20 You cannot say, or guess, for you know only A heap of broken images, where the sun beats, And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief, And the dry stone no sound of water. Only There is shadow under this red rock, (Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust. 30 Frisch weht der Wind Der Heimat zu Mein Irisch Kind, Wo weilest du? "You gave me hyacinths first a year ago; "They called me the hyacinth girl." - Yet when we came back, late, from the Hyacinth garden, Your arms full, and your hair wet, I could not Speak, and my eyes failed, I was neither Living nor dead, and I knew nothing, 40 Looking into the heart of light, the silence. Öd’ und leer das Meer.
xxx/ellauri121.html on line 470:
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 768: What books are worth reading for life?
xxx/ellauri122.html on line 840: accident. What follows is a series of adventures that
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 571: It didn’t matter that the list was arbitrary. What mattered was that it sent me on a path where I would look for rules and principles everywhere, learn to tell the difference, and continue to build my life around them as I went. Like never pee against the wind.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 607: Sometimes, you can’t find the power to move on immediately. Sometimes, you really want to kick yourself. That too is part of life. What you can do is allow time to pass. You can´t kick yourself in the ass, nor fuck yourself. You gotta ask someone for help.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 613:
3. What others think of you is none of your business.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 615: Most of our scars come from wounds inflicted by other people (see rule 6). Words can hurt us more than weapons. But it’s not your job to imagine what arrows people might point at you inside their heads. The majority will never fire. What you think of them they could care less.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 649: Whatever problems plague you in your day-to-day life, chances are, they’re not all that important in the grand scheme of things. In fact you are not worth a shit in the grand scheme of things. We each have our own challenges, but as long as you can smile, do it. Who knows who you’ll infect. If you´re lucky you got Corona.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 651: Hayley Mills the Pollyanna could do it, and how. What a Lolita. And she could play The Gay Game too, heteronormal that she was.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 661: Vapaapainissa yleisön osa show’ssa on hyvin tärkeää. Yleisö hurraa faceille ja toistaa heidän iskulauseena ja buuaa heeleille. Huudot ovat samankaltaisia kuin jääkiekko-otteluiden kannatushuudot. Painijoiden uran kulku määräytyy yleisön reaktion mukaan. Asshole! - Nananana, nananana, heey, heey, heey, goodbye! - Holy shit! - You fucked up! - You screwed Bret! - What? - Boring! - You suck! - You tapped out! -You still got it! - YES! - NO! - MAYBE!
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 129: Silicone sweethearts remain resolutely inert, but change is afoot in the world of sex dolls, with a drive to make them ever more lifelike. First stop is a throbbing heart and a heating element, custom-made nipples and wobbling artificial labia – researchers are utilising new technology to persuade their dolls to smile, pout, flutter their eyelashes, tell jokes, and fake orgasm. What more is needed anyway? Down in the dolls’ nether regions, heating and lubrication systems are in the early stages of development for a more “authentic” sexual experience, along with muscle spasms to simulate female orgasm. “Pubic hair is making a comeback,” offers company owner Matt, running his hand through some plastic pubes.
xxx/ellauri124.html on line 564: In case you're somehow 15 years behind, emoji are taking over the world. But although there is an obvious benefit to having such a large arsenal of emoji with which to freely share your life with the rest of the world, the choices you have can become overwhelming. For example, what do all the cat emoji mean? Why do we need so many of them? What the heck am I supposed to use them all for? Well, if you're feeling overwhelmed, have no fear — I'm here to help you.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 305: What you’ll learn is that as far as West is concerned, critics can go to hell. Within the first verse of the first song, he’s dismissed “whatever y’all been hearing.” As an exclamation point to his prowess, by the end of the song he’s being sexually serviced by a woman at a nightclub.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 801: "What I really don't like—there are certain girls that like us, or like me, who are really messed up... and they do not need to be—they're very young—and they do not need to be taken and raped, or filmed having enema contests... going out into the audience and picking up fourteen and fifteen-year-old girls who obviously cut themselves, and then having to see them in the morning... it's just uncool."
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 373: In any case, a lot of what they have done focuses only on looks. These studies often conclude that various aspects of women's bodies make them more appealing because men think that they're more fertile — insert eye roll here. What's fertility got to do with it?
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 500: 9. Late in the novel, Nathan discovers that Faunia had kept a diary and that “the illiteracy had been an act, something she decided her situation demanded” [p. 297]. Why did Faunia feign illiteracy? Was there any reason why she chose this flaw in lieu of others? What are the implications of her secret?
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 504: 13. Nathan interprets Coleman’s choosing to reject his past and create a new identity for himself as “the drama that underlies America’s story, the high drama that is upping and leaving—and the energy and cruelty that rapturous drive demands,” whereas Walter thinks of his brother as a “calculating liar,” a “heartless son,” and a “traitor to his race” [p. 342]. Which of these views seems closer to the truth? Are they both legitimate? What is Ernestine’s position?
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 508: 16. The Human Stain is a novel of sweeping ambition that tells the stories not just of individual lives but of the moral ethos of America at the end of the twentieth century. How would that ethos be described? What does the novel reveal about the complexity of issues such as race, sex, identity, and privacy?
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 743: Endymion received scathing criticism after its release, and Keats himself noted its diffuse and unappealing style. Keats did not regret writing it, as he likened the process to leaping into the ocean to become more acquainted with his surroundings; in a poem to J. A. Hessey, he expressed that "I was never afraid of failure; for I would sooner fail than not be among the greatest." However, he did feel regret in its publishing, saying "it is not without a feeling of regret that I make it public." Not all critics disliked the work. eg. the poet Thomas Hood. Henry Morley said, "The song of Endymion throbs throughout with a noble poet's sense of all that his art means for him. What mechanical defects there are in it may even serve to quicken our sense of the youth and freshness of this voice of aspiration." Meaning: Dig it mon. Endymionin jälkeen Keaz kommentoi sen vastaanottoa seuraavasti.
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 749: What Elysium have ye known, Oliko teilläkin joku Champs Elysees,
xxx/ellauri127.html on line 773: What Elysium have ye known, Ette takuulla ole käyneet Champs Elyseessä,
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 449: What fucking stakes? Dan on kylä putkiaivoinen idari. Mutta on Nodierkin täysi tunari.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 648: Theophilus, however, held quite decisive religious beliefs. After many years of marriage, Elizabeth Packard outwardly questioned her husband's beliefs and began expressing opinions that were contrary to his. While the main subject of their dispute was religion, the couple also disagreed on child rearing, family finances, and the issue of slavery, with Elizabeth defending John Brown, which embarrassed Theophilus. What was worst, she also worked as a teacher in Jacksonville, Illinois.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 585: So the other day, he blacked up as [black footballer] Lee for a sketch, complete with a pineapple to represent his hair. Boy that went down in the colored audience! Skinner has been that funny for as long as he can remember as far as he can remember. He has a masters in English literature; he is a practising Roman catholic. What a laugh. Skinner once had a chat with Eddie Izzard about what they could share about their lives on stage. It was fine for Izzard to discuss wearing women’s clothes, but as for Skinner’s own religious beliefs about God's knob? God, no. Too shameful.
xxx/ellauri130.html on line 754:
Pienikin verso osoittaa et k:a ei ole. K. on oikeasti kivempaa kuin kukaan otaxuu.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 518: What underpinned this shame, this "I'm not good enough," -- which, we all know that feeling: "I'm not white enough. I'm not thin enough, rich enough, beautiful enough, smart enough, promoted enough." The thing that underpinned this was excruciating vulnerability. This idea of, in order for connection to happen, we have to allow ourselves to be seen, really seen, butts bare.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 520: There was only one variable that separated the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging and the people who really struggle for it. And that was, the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging believe they're worthy of love and belonging. That's it. These are whole-hearted people, self-satisfied people, living from this deep sense of worthiness. What they had in common was a sense of courage. Courage, the original definition of courage, when it first came into the English language -- it's from the Latin word "cor," meaning "heart" -- and the original definition was to be who you are with your whole heart (sydän taas, hui, yäk). And so these folks had, very simply, the courage to be imperfect.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 532: How would you define vulnerability? What makes you feel vulnerable? Having to ask my husband for help because I'm sick; initiating sex with my husband; initiating sex with my boss; Initiating sex with a bunch of strangers; being turned down; being turned upside down; asking someone out; asking someone in and out; waiting for the doctor to call back; waiting for the doctor to cum on my back; getting laid off; getting laid; laying off people; getting laid by a bunch of people. This is the world we live in. We live in a vulnerable world. And one of the ways we deal with it is we numb vulnerability. Apina kiipee puuhun, kakkaa gorillan suuhun.
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 402: What use to hope for anything like that again
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 403: With someone else? What use to seek in any wise?
xxx/ellauri137.html on line 745: Answer to What does "onna" mean in Japanese? How is the word used? 女 “onna” means female as an antonym of 男 “otoko” (male). The female has a protruding belly. The male has two feet, a tail in front, and a territory in place of head. If you go to a public bath in Japan, this Kanji character 女 shows you which bath room women should go in. Onna means 'bitch' ergo otoko means 'dog'.
xxx/ellauri138.html on line 116:
SunSentinel: To Be Wealthy, First Learn What Makes You Tick. Retrieved 8 October 2012.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 544: Whatever he shall wish, betide her weal or woe. Vaikka saisi siitä panna päänsä tukille.
xxx/ellauri139.html on line 1214: He stops at Sonya's place on the way and she gives him a crucifix. At the bureau he learns of Svidrigailov's suicide, and almost changes his mind, even leaving the building. But he sees Sonya, who has followed him, looking at him in despair, and he returns to make a full and frank confession of the murders. What the fuck.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 98: Fig. 1. What he really wants to be, McCormack says, is erect. xxx/ellauri148.html on line 155: Today, Judaism still waits for the coming of the Messiah, but who are they expecting? What qualifications need to met by the Messiah. Moses Ben Maimon (Maimonides), also called Rambam, or Little Drummer Boy, (1135-1204), wrote in his Thirteen Articles of Faith, that belief in the Messiah was required for a Jew to be resurrected. The 12th and 13th articles both deal with Redemption, which will come in the days of Messiah. Eli lisätään dekalogin perään nämä pykälät:
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 195: And the land shall mourn (Zech. 12:12). What is the reason of the mourning? R. Dosa and the rabbis differ about it. R. Dosa says: “[They will mourn] over the Messiah who will be slain, “ and the say; “[The will mourn] over the Evil Inclination which will be killed [in the days of the Messiah]…” Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52a[7]
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 207: R. Y’hoshu’a ben Levi once found Elijah standing at the entrance of the cave or R. Shim’on ben Yohai…He asked him: “When will the Messiah come?” He said to him: “Go, ask him himself” “And where does he sit? “At the entrance of the city [of Rome]” “And what are his marks?” “His marks are that he sits among the poor who suffer of diseases, and while all of them unwind and rewind[the bandages of all their wounds] at once, he unwinds and rewinds them one by one, for he says, ‘Should I be summoned, there must be no delay.’” R. Y’hoshu’a went to him and said to him; “Peace be unto you, my Master and Teacher!” He said to him: “Peace unto you, Son of Levi!” He said to him: when will the Master come?” He said to him: “Today.” R. Y’hoshu’a went to Elijah, who asked him; “What did he tell you?” R. Y’hoshu’s said “[He said to me:] Peace be unto you, Son of Levi!” Elijah said to him: “[By saying this] he assured the World to Come for you and your father.” R. Y’hoshu’a then said to Elijah: “The Messiah lied to me, for he said ‘today I shall come,’ and he did not come.” Elijah said: “This is what he told you: 'Today', If you but hearken to His voice’ (Ps. 95:7) (Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 98a)[12]
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 238: Behold I will make Jerusalem a cup of staggering unto all the peoples round about (Zech. 12:2). What is “cup of staggering”? [It means] that He will in the future make peoples drink the cup of staggering of blood….when they [Gog and Magog] go up there, what do they? They assign two warriors to every one of the Children of Israel. Why? So that they should not escape. When the heroes of Judah ascend and reach Jerusalem, they pray in their heart…In that hour the Holy One, blessed be He, gives heroism to Judah and they draw their weapons and smite those men on their right and on their left, and slay them (Midrash Tehillim, Psalm 119, ed. Buber pp. 488-89)
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 483: Madrid, Spain. “Día mundial de la Filosofía” by Más Filosofía. Despite the exceptional situation in which we find ourselves and the restrictions that this entails in terms of the possibility of carrying out large-scale face-to-face events, Más Filosofía has decided to continue with our project, one more year, to celebrate World Philosophy Day. In this edition we will try to carry out both online and face-to-face activities (as long as the restrictions allow it). What about, we have not the foggiest as yet.
xxx/ellauri148.html on line 485: Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain: “Philosophy, Future and what now?” by University of la Lacuna. Date: November 11, 2021. Place: Salón de Grados (1st year students, Philosophy), Aula 4.6 (2nd year students, Future), Aula 4.5 (3rd year students, What now?), Seminar 3 (4th year students, TBD.). Philosophy Section. Free admission at the following link.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 105: The American poet Wilt Whatman cited Sand´s novel Consuelo as a personal favorite, and the sequel to this novel, La Comtesse de Rudolstadt, contains at least a couple of passages that appear to have had a very direct influence on him. As a gayperson to another gayperson. Virginia Woolfilla oli varmasti samansuuntaisia internal strifejä vaikkei käyttänytkään miehen nimeä.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 239: Matho is tortured before his execution; Salammbô, witnessing this, dies of shock. The Zaïmph has brought death upon those who touched it. What shock? Sounds more like a case of poisoning:
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 73: Who am I? What is my name? Why am I here? I lie empty, open, choiceless on a beach—waiting for a gift from the sea.
xxx/ellauri157.html on line 608:
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 48: Papen travelled with with Australian photographer Jesse Walker to the isolated Omo Valley in south-western Ethiopia, where she lived for a whole week with the Surma tribe. Papen said: 'What we claim to call beautiful in our Western world isn´t quite the same how the Surma tribe pursues beauty. Both Surma men and woman pierce their ears, some woman stretch their lower lip with a plate.
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 227: What thou hast done with thy wee babe
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 598: Here is another example framed by the powerful and disturbing poem What a friend we have in Jesus? by K L Burns from MRRC Silverwater Correctional Centre, quoted on the same website:
xxx/ellauri165.html on line 634:
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 46: What was the significance of Aaron's rod? All Master chefs have great staffs. The Lord told Moses, "Buds will sprout on the staff belonging to the man I choose. They left their rods before the Lord, and in the morning "Aaron's staff, representing the tribe of Levi, had sprouted, budded, blossomed, and produced ripe almonds" (verse 8).
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 308: By now, all our souls have been recycled though the washing machine of Time many times. What your soul accomplished in previous descents, and what is left to be accomplished—all that is of necessity hidden from you. As Rabbi Moshe Cordovero wrote, “Those who know do not say, and those who say do not know.”
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 351: Whatever you ask in my name (Yahusha), that will I do, so that the Father Yahuah may be glorified in the son Yahusha. 14 If you happen to ask anything in my name, I will do it. John 14:13-14
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 305: Kommunikoit ystäviesi kanssa tekstiviesteillä (siis niillä ihan oikeilla, ei Whatsappilla). Minkä ystävien? Watsappi on aivan perseestä, telegrammi on parempi. Kylä käytän sms:iä, ellen sitten säpöä tai virallisia postikortteja.
xxx/ellauri167.html on line 602: Journalists face just the same old challenges than they did in Chicago in 1968. As the president vilifies the media as “the enemy of the people,” and reporters have occasion to attend his rallies with a security detail in tow, it’s clear that the specter of violence again looms large. There is also ferocious disagreement over the meaning of what we view on social media or television, a disagreement that clearly is not native to America, but brought in by the white immigrants. What is obvious to some is not to others, who would contend, for example, that “truth is not truth but alternative truth, " or "news is not news but fake news", or "election is not a vote but a steal".
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 102: The meme rot of the term ever since is evident. Roaches creeping out from every crevice: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for a "new world order" based on new ideas, saying the era of tyranny has come to a dead-end. Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili said "it's time to move from words. We are also fighting for a New World Order". Turkish President Abdullah Gül said: "I don't think you can control all the world from one centre. There are big nations. There are huge populations. There is unbelievable economic development in some parts of the world. So what we have to do is, instead of unilateral actions, act all together, make common decisions and have consultations with the world, to let a new world order emerge." What the FUCK!? And here is the death blow:
xxx/ellauri168.html on line 266: A key problem of physicalism, however, is its inability to make sense of how our subjective experience of qualities—what it is like to feel the warmth of fire, the redness of an apple, the bitterness of disappointment and so on—could arise from mere arrangements of physical stuff. (What the fuck? Who says it can't? Rousseau? Bergson? Wittgenstein? Anyway, what is there to make sense of in the first place?)
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 69: William Wordsworth used the expression, "The child is the father of the man" in his famous 1802 poem, "My Heart Leaps Up," also known as "The Rainbow." This quote has made its way into popular culture. What does it mean?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 135: What does "meanest flower might blow" mean? Debanjan Chakraborty. 185●11 gold badge●11 silver badge●33 bronze badges. edited Aug 6 '16 at 1:40
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 148: Blow: What it says - unless it is an archaic version of "bloom" as suggested in another answer. I'll let the rest of my post stay for reference.
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 166:
What is the name of the blow flowers you make a wish on ...
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 452: Ultimately it involves self-immolation – rather like Kliban's parking meter violation. What this means will become clearer as you read on. We can confirm however that the result of not having a ‘self’ is truly a magical, wonderful and freeing experience. Not anything like what you have been lead to believe by reading/watching really bad sci-fi involving lobotomised zombies like the dementors in His Master's Voice!
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 458: What is the purpose of this life on earth as a human being?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 460: What is happiness?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 462: What is the meaning of ‘matter is not merely passive’?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 464: What do you mean by Virtual Freedom?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 472: What is apperception?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 474: What is actual intimacy?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 476: What is thought?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 478: What is consciousness?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 480: What is the identity?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 490: What is the risk of using the actualism method?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 504: What are instinctual passions?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 508: What to do with the instinctual passions?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 530: What are vibes and psychic powers?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 546: What happened at the seminal event?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 552: What is role of the Actual Freedom Trust?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 576: What is the difference between actualism and Vipassana?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 578: What is the difference between actuality and the Truth?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 580: What is the difference between reality and actuality?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 584: What is the difference between feeling-caring and actually caring? (See also)
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 586: What is the difference between apperception and choiceless awareness?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 588: What is the difference between the ego and the soul?
xxx/ellauri170.html on line 590: What is the difference between good feelings and feeling good?
xxx/ellauri176.html on line 857: 99. Mutta sanotaan nyt lopultakin hyvästit raivostuttavasti kähnäävälle Mikille! Ize asiassa hän tulee mukaamme ilmoitti gigolo. What the fuck? (Tätä ei voi kääntää japanixi.) Tuo kuulostaa aika äkkinäiseltä! Tuijotin miestäni. Norja-tädistä se oli kiva ajatus. Eikö täällä kysytä multa mitään äyskähdin. Mielessäni väikkyneet caipirinhat vaihtuivat maitoon ja kexeihin, bylsipatukka koiran puruluuhun.
xxx/ellauri176.html on line 891: What is the 'alt-right'? Who coined the term 'alt-right'? The white supremacist Richard Spencer devised the term in 2010. He has described the movement as "identity politics for white Americans and for Europeans around the world". What does it stand for? The movement supports extreme rightwing ideologies, including white nationalism – used interchangeably with white supremacism – and antisemitism. It positions itself broadly against egalitarianism, democracy, universalism and multiculturalism.
xxx/ellauri177.html on line 430: -- Whatever! Rakastatko minua?
xxx/ellauri178.html on line 304: What does the Bible say about impotence? Of 20 Bible verses about impotence not ONE even mentions the problem, let alone the word. Here's a grep:
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 85: What words of wisdom can I give them?
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 126: What the fuck, gentle Rima would prickle his ass with darts if she could. Kayla Ancrum would gleefully join in.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 191: Ärsyttävät jenkkipaskiaiset yrittää etuilla junassa pikku lahjuxilla. Biarritzin vaarallisella rannalla meri kävi ja vei multa uimahousut jalasta. "Kake" sanoo sivulauseessa että se on katolinen. What? Oliko Hemingway katolinen? onko paavi? Katoliset ainakin koittaa röyhkeästi omia vanhaa roistoa omiin riveihinsä.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 260: Turauxen on kirjoittanut joku Anders Hallengren, an associate professor of Comparative Literature and a research fellow in the Department of History of Literature and the History of Ideas at Stockholm University. Heserved as consulting editor for literature at Nobelprize.org. Dr. Hallengren is a fellow of The Hemingway Society (USA) and was on the Steering Committee for the 1993 Guilin ELT/Hemingway International Conference in the People’s Republic of China. Among his works in English are The Code of Concord: Emerson’s Search for Universal Laws; Gallery of Mirrors: Reflections of Swedenborgian Thought; and What is National Literature: Lectures on Emerson, Dostoevsky, Hemingway and the... Pelkkiä noloja setämiehiä!
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 321: But what about the ugliness, then? What about all the evil, the crude, the rude, the rough, the vulgar aspects of his work, even the horror, which dismayed people? How could all that be compatible with moral standards? Niin, sas se!
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 366: “I'll have a grappa. What's yours?” Papa said.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 406: “Monday. The man in the street.” It was Wednesday and it was hot. “What happened?”
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 442: Papa grabbed his wrist and punched his stomach with it. “What do you think of that?” He looked at Papa. One of the Americans slapped him and pushed his chest. “Come on, now, boy.” The Americans made for the door. Nick followed, and then the man after him.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 490: “Yes Papa, but he can't decide what he wants,” Juice said. “What do you think?”
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 524: “What did you think about Nick Adams?” the other asked.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 550: “Oh, yeah? What's a bright boy to you? You're something of a bright boy yourself.”
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 570: “What did he do?”
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 614: WhatHenry James did or didn’t do with Oliver Wendell Holmes (or anyone else). By Leon Edel Dec 12, 19963:30 AM
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 623: What evidence does Novick offer for the James-Holmes “affair”? Just two French words James uses in his long and vivid notebook entry recalling his early days in Boston, where his family settled in a brick house in Ashburton Place near the State House. The words are l’initiation première–“first initiation.” In the entry, James is writing generally of the “rite of passage” that inaugurated his literary career. He describes the strong emotions he felt at the assassination of Lincoln (on James’$2 22nd birthday); how he wept when Hawthorne died; and the dawning sense of freedom experienced after the war’s end. He mentions also his first book review on English novel-writing, published in the North American Review, whose editors paid him $12, praised his writing, and asked for more. He does mention Holmes, but only to describe a brief visit he made to Holmes’ mother to ask how her son was faring in England, and his own fierce envy of Holmes for traveling abroad while James remained at home.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 652: More black humor: "Get up," Kake tells Bill, who replies "What? I never get up." Of course, it is Kake, not Bill, who never gets up. Later, trout (again, a phallic fish) try in vain to swim against the current of a waterfall, and — not so humorously — Kake reads a book about a man frozen inside a glacier whose wife awaits the reappearance of his body for twenty-four years. Kake is "frozen," too, only no one has the patience to await his unthawing.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 762: So the next time you visit your ladies, talk to them. Listen to them and you may be surprised by what you learn. What did you hear from your chickens? Let us know in the comments section below…
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 775: What if a chick is chirping in a way that it sounds like she’s “rolling her r’s”? She does this at random times of the day. She also has a respiratory infection, so what I’m saying is that I would like to know if this means shes hurting or if she’s happy.
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 901: What did the Colonel’s Lady think? Mitä everstin leidi ajatteli?
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 933: What they called the Great Gawd Budd— ne sanoi sitä gautama buddaxi---
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 199:
Every night before going to sleep, we must ask ourselves: whose weakness did I overcome today? What asset did I acquire?
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 284: What makes him tick? Each night now I tie Mikä saa sen tikittämään? Joka ilta sidon
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 495: What the fuck. Mitä vitun rakkautta se nyt on että nirhaa tyypin jota rakastaa. Siinä on jotain vakavasti vinxallaan. Narsismia taas. Näitähän riittää vieläkin Porvoon mitalla, muttei niissä kyllä ole mitään hurrattavaa. Naiset taas vaan keiloina joita miesten keilapallot mukiloivat.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 583: What's the best thing in the world? Mikä on maailman paras asia?
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 593: What's the best thing in the world ? Mikä on maailman paras asia?
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 790: b) The Quran also claims for itself a very impeccable status: it is errorless (4:82; 18:1), eternal (85:21-22; 43:3-4), final revelation to humankind (2:2; 10:37), incomparable in beauty and elegance (29:48; 2:23), the very word of God (1:1-7), not originating in the will of Muhammad (53:1-5, 10-11) and many other things. If the Quran is truly errorless, could a historical error be possible? What if "God" is a historical error? Naah, that can't be. He said as much himself.
xxx/ellauri186.html on line 792: c) The objection might also imply something about the character of Allah and his ability to use inaccuracies or falsities within his revealed truth. What makes matters worse for the objector is the pivotal role the Quran plays within Muslim thought concerning inspiration. Islamic scholar Stefan Wild asserts
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 111: First of all, it provided him with an uncanny empathy for women. His two most potent and obsessive literary images were the unrequited female lover and the woman artist struggling to find freedom and space for her work. But Rilke's liberated feminine side also gave him the gift of unabashed openness to his need and desire for the opposite sex (from women). He recalls Kierkegaard's description of Mozart's Don Giovanni, who did not calculatedly seduce, according to Kierkegaard, but desired seductively. What women found irresistible about Rilke was not the effect he had on them but the effect they had on him.
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 139: This is formidable revisionism. The cumulative effect of such a distortion of truth to an admirable, if sadly misplaced, idea of redemption and redress is to make Freedman's biography read like a forced confession. But the beating heart of Freedman's interminable deconstruction is Rilke the sexist. Rilke's extraordinary sensitivity to women, his admiration and need for strong and intelligent women, women's love for Rilke--these facts Freedman brusquely mentions only to knock down. What he wants is to prove that Rilke was a spirited accomplice in European society's subjugation of women. He writes,
xxx/ellauri187.html on line 197: But why did aging Rodin in his 60s capture Rilke’s imagination at the turn of the last century? It’s hard to see at first. What made Rodin radical then is no longer radical today. In his “Self-Portrait” (1890), Rodin grimaces amidst rough marks. The picture emblematizes how Rodin heralded raw and unpolished sculptures that were strikingly modern. It was a breath of fresh air since most of early-19th-century sculpture was smooth, neoclassical, and to be harshly honest, predictably dainty. Charles Baudelaire lamented this nadir in 1846 when he wrote his provocative essay “Why Sculpture is Boring.” Rodin went on to prove Baudelaire wrong. He showed how sculpture could be modern with distorted, coarse, rough textures. Rodin knocked the idealized body off its pedestal. And the modern sculptors that came after him saw no reason to put it back.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 458: Actor Laurence Fox (extreme right) with his Lewis co-stars Kevin Whateley and Amanda Griffin. Note Amanda is colored but she talks and acts almost like one of us. xxx/ellauri193.html on line 499: jatkuvasti kiskoo voittoa. What xxx/ellauri193.html on line 596: But it’s not just the imaginary humiliations. There’s just something off-putting about deciding that two bodies of work are of exactly equal merit. I’m all for the notion that literature is such a varied seascape that it’s impossible to get your bearings, let alone arrange things in order; and I’m comfortable with the idea that, of course, some writers are better than others. But once the scorekeeping gets specific, it just feels wrong. What’s better, Guernica or Citizen Kane? The Velvet Underground and Nico or really good Mexican food? The Great Gatsby or your best friend in high school? These are ridiculous questions, and the fairest answer—ladies and gentlemen, it’s a tie!—somehow muddies all the contestants, even the enchiladas.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 726: What about human rights of murderers, rapists and child molesters? GBV is the way to go. Publicly shaming offenders guilty of child abuse would be shameful. Heavy fines don’t do that, prison sentences are no punishment for many — free board and lodging for a while and then back home to continue your life of violence and abuse. Alex suggests the pillory. You may laugh. It’s a comical medieval form of punishment. But think about it.
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 730: LETTER: What will it take to get selfish people to obey the law?
xxx/ellauri193.html on line 764: 467 convicted murderers in 18 prisons (urban and rural) in all 9 provinces of our country, located by the South African Department of Correctional Services (DCS), completed a questionnaire, approved by this department. 392 men and 75 women were interviewed before completing their questionnaires. The latter consisted of questions regarding general information such as age, race group, gender, and length of sentence. The first question focussed on: (1.a.1) What was your motive for committing murder (jealousy, spite, anger, thoughtlessness, money, or anything else - that had to be indicated)? (1.a.2) Were you exposed to violence shortly before committing murder (electronic media, or any other type of violence – that had to be indicated)? (1.b) Which of the following contributing factors played a role in the commitment of the murder (drugs, alcohol, or both)? (1.c) Was the murder premeditated or committed impulsively? The second question focussed on: (2.a) Do you think capital punishment would be a deterrent to committing serious crimes? (2.b) And in your specific case: Do you think capital punishment would have been a deterrent to committing murder? Question three (3) asked: Was the victim known to you? By name, sight, or not at all? Question four was interested in: (4.a) Are you currently involved in a rehabilitation program. And (4.b): If you are currently involved in a rehabilitation program, do you think this program is helpful, and if yes, in which ways? The last question (5) focussed on: Will you murder again? In gaol or after you have been released?
xxx/ellauri195.html on line 201: See also Xerxes I's whipping of the Hellespont. Sama Ahasverus bylsi Esteriä perseeseen, mistä juutalaiset ovat kiitollisia sille vielä tänäänkin. Jöns palautti mieleen että Monty Pythonin leffassa Holy Grail kun Arthur tuli uhoilemaan ranskalaisille sanoen: I am the king, I am king Arthur, ne vastasivat: What king? We did not vote for you. Sama kuin mun vastaus keskustan kansanedustajalle, jonka Kouvolan puolustajat oli kiskoneet kasarminmäelle kehittämään Kouvolaa eli puolustamaan mäelle osoittavaa yliopistokylttiä.
xxx/ellauri195.html on line 213: world: What is the summum bonum—the supreme good? You have life before
xxx/ellauri195.html on line 214: you. Once only you can live it. What is the noblest object of desire, the supreme gift to covet? We have been accustomed to be told that the greatest thing in the religious world is Faith. That great word has been the key-note for centuries of the popular religion; and we have easily learned to look upon it as the greatest thing in the world. Well, we are wrong. It is love! all you need is love; love, love, love is all you need. Näitä merkkejä on alkanut taas näkyä viestimissä Ukraina-miekkareissa. Niitä vilahteli myös Gently-sarjassa brittein ydinasevastustajien miekkarissa 1967. Ne näyttää erehdyttävästi ylösalaisilta pilluilta. Kristina täti ärähti kun huomautin sille siitä.
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 106: Just Argument: “What if he should have a radish shoved up his ass because he trusted you and then have hot ashes rip off his hair? What argument will he be able to offer to prevent himself from having a gaping-anus?”
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 314: Wilt Whatman, Barrel Browning.
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1049: In The War on the West, Douglas Murray shows how many well-meaning people have been fooled by hypocritical and inconsistent anti-West rhetoric. After all, if we must discard the ideas of Kant, Hume, and Mill for their opinions on race, shouldn’t we discard Marx (Karl, Groucho´s OK), the Jew whose work is peppered with racial slurs and anti-Semitism? Embers of racism remain to be stamped out in America, but what about the raging racist inferno in the Middle East and Asia? What about Israel? Nigeria?
xxx/ellauri199.html on line 1065: What´s the use? Terveisiä sontaläjästä, 300M kärpästä lähettää. Tää on kaikki täysin ennustettavaa. Saarnaajaa nyt kehiin hei.
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 55: What cannot be explained, do not explain.
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 233: What is wrong with soap?
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 246: What you will show me
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 290: What you think of prospects of world peace?
xxx/ellauri200.html on line 404:
What is the Nigerian scam (419 scam)?
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 303: What he does in the picture is silence. He has just been asked a question and he is thinking about how to answer it.
xxx/ellauri202.html on line 379: If Adolf Hitler had Jewish ancestry, then how could we reconcile that with the fact that he was responsible for the Holocaust? Why not, I don't see the point? That he could not have killed his fellow Jews? What a racist notion. Sax believes that Hitler’s alleged lineage might actually help explain his anti-Semitism.
xxx/ellauri208.html on line 1114: Who can be sure that he is the son of his father? What with all these tents and nightgowns? Its just too easy to crawl under them and grab a piece of naked ass. Orpo Gebelin lojalty on kahtia.
xxx/ellauri215.html on line 139: Various rabbis and Jewish community leaders accused Roth of cultural treason. “What is being done to silence this man?” Emanuel Rackman, the president of the Rabbinical Council of America, wrote. “Medieval Jews would have known what to do with him.”
xxx/ellauri215.html on line 376: This is not a world where the big can rule over the small. What the world needs to see is a game rules-based international order where all of us can at least believe that we stick to the rules, the U.S. rules which Russia is not sticking to at the moment.
xxx/ellauri215.html on line 442: WEDNESDAY, April 13, 2022 (HealthDay News) -- The more orgasms you have, the more you come to expect. And the reverse is also true, according to a new study of the so-called orgasm gap -- in which men climax far more often than their female partners. Haha of course, when the male comes, its GAME OVER, and it takes just 5 to 40 thrusts! "Our expectations are shaped by our experiences, so when women orgasm less, they will desire and expect to orgasm less," said study author Grace Wetzel, a doctoral student in social psychology at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J. "If women lower their expectations in this way, the more orgasm inequality may perpetuate in relationship," she said in a Rutgers news release. What else is new? How many times female orgasm is mentioned in Talmud?
xxx/ellauri218.html on line 100:
What war was USA involved in 1992?
xxx/ellauri218.html on line 295: Penn was born and raised in Atlanta. She started her company in 2008 at the age of 8. She spoke at the TEDWomen event in San Francisco, which was streamed live on TED.com. She has done 2 official TEDTalks and 1 TEDxxxTalk. Penn is also an animator and artist, drawing cartoon characters from an early age. She is the creator of an animated series called The Pollinators which focuses on the importance of birds and bees and other pollinators like men. She premiered a clip of The Pollinators and another animated series called Malicious Dishes at TEDWomen 2013. What a dish!
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 137: David Walsh of World Socialist Web Site wrote: "The 'hope' now Moore expresses near the conclusion of the work that we might 'get rid of the whole rotten system that gave us Donald Trump' is empty and meaningless, in so far as he continues to support one of the principal props of that rotten system, the Democratic Party. Whatever occasional insights and striking imagery it might offer, Fahrenheit 11/9 is false and dishonest at its core."
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 341: What was this book even about??? The "narrator" kept jumping around with what he was talking about, quite a few times I had no idea who was speaking, and what was the point of all the billionaires? They had absolutely nothing to do with the story! It took 104 pages of confusing and pointless narrative for the guy to tell the girl (after 40 years of knowing her, no less) that he wanted to be with her. This might have been one of the most anti-climactic love stories I have ever read. The secondary characters seemed completely irrelevant to the plotline and it appeared that their only function was to take up printable space. The story was unimaginative, lacking in depth, and devoid of anything memorable. The only reason I bothered to finish it was to get one step closer to finishing my goodreads reading challenge, else I would have ditched it at page 20.
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 363: We should never think selfless virtue can be reached by treading on others. The cold splinter at the heart of the true artist must be harsher in its quarrel with the self than it is in its rhetorical engagement with other people. For believers, this is the virtue of humility; I am not sure what the rest of us can call it. What we can agree on is the constant examination of conscience, and, when we fall short, a conscious decision to do better.
xxx/ellauri224.html on line 497: Whatever happened to letting someone rest in peace? Rest in pees, my darling, and eat my shorz.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 141: Scientists and naturalists have discovered the Fibonacci sequence appearing in many forms in nature, such as the shape of nautilus shells, the seeds of sunflowers, falcon flight patterns and galaxies flying through space. What's more mysterious is that the "divine" number equals your height divided by the height of your torso, and even weirder, the ratio of female bees to male bees in a typical hive! (Livio)
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 179: "Minusta historia ja Suuri Tarina ovat sama asia", Kilroy sanoi lopulta. "Ne ovat tapoja pitää ja säilyttää pyhät asiat." "Mitä on pyhyys?" "Se mikä on totta on pyhää. Se minkä edestä on kärsitty. Se mikä on kaunista." (Vittu koita päättää! Nuo ovat 3 eri asiaa!!!) "Joten Suuri Tarina yrittää siis löytää totuuden tapahtumista... tai tuskan tai kauneuden?" "Ei ole mitään tarvetta yrittää löytää sitä", Unroy sanoi. "Pyhyys on totuudessa, tuskassa ja kauneudessa. Siksi niistä kertominen on pyhää." What bullshit.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 298: The first three Earthsea novels together follow Ged from youth to old age, and each of them also follow the coming of age of a different character. A Wizard of Earthsea focuses on Ged´s adolescence, while The Tombs of Atuan and The Farthest Shore explore that of Tenar and the prince Arren, respectively. A Wizard of Earthsea is frequently described as a Bildungsroman, in which Ged´s coming of age is intertwined with the physical journey he undertakes through the novel. To Mike Cadden the book was a convincing tale "to a reader as young and possibly as headstrong as Ged, and therefore sympathetic to him". Reviewers have described the ending of the novel, wherein Ged finally accepts the shadow as a part of himself, as a rite of passage. Scholar Jeanne Walker writes that the rite of passage at the end was an analogue for the entire plot of A Wizard of Earthsea, and that the plot itself plays the role of a rite of passage for an adolescent reader. Any fucking involved at all? What kind of coming of age would it be without some?
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 380: I also wonder whether Bloom would relinquish his status as an intellectual of the highest order to feel for one day the exuberance and passion of Hart Crane. Stick his doubly branching tree into some applejack and squirt it out. What would he be willing to let go of to actually feel intimately the joy and euphoria that so seduces him in his imagination? Asks Elaine Margolin / TruthDig Contributor.
xxx/ellauri225.html on line 390: Throughout the early 1920s, small but well-respected literary magazines published some of Crane's poems, gaining him among the avant-garde a respect that White Buildings (1926), his first volume, ratified and strengthened. White Buildings contains many of Crane's best poems, including "For the Marriage of Faustus and Helen", and "Voyages", a sequence of erotic poems. They were written while he was falling in love with Emil Opffer, a Danish merchant mariner. What ho, he was a homophile, like his heroes Wilt Whatman and T.S. Eliot.
xxx/ellauri228.html on line 440:
What kind of people make you ashamed to be a mucilid?
xxx/ellauri228.html on line 484: What about my last dinner? I missed my holy lunch. Where´s my last breakfast woman? What, brain flakes again? I want frankfurters beans and eggs! Hot mineral oil with ball bearings floating in it!
xxx/ellauri228.html on line 504: What follows are some sample recipes of dishes one might find at a Holy Supper in Eastern U.S. The meal should include fluffy bread with a lot of gas in it. Breaking wind at a meal is a longstanding Christian tradition evoking a key characteristic of our Lord. Feel free to build your own menu with additional appropriate fishes from your own family fish collection.
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 108: What an Old Wife said is True That she saw a Spright is what an Old Wife said; therefore That she saw a Spright is True.
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 110: What’s Promis’d will be; but That my Debtor will pay me money to morrow is what’s promis’d;
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 142: (5.) The sweet bond of Christian love and unity will be strengthened. – We shall be often led to think of those dear brothers and sisters in the Lord, here and elsewhere, who agree to join with us in reading those portions. We shall oftener be led to agree on earth, touching something we shall ask of God. (He won´t change his mind, he has already planned all of this ahead. But he likes us to try and twist his arm anyway.) We shall pray over the same promises, mourn over the same confessions, praise God in the same songs, and be nourished by the same words of eternal life. What could be better than that! If one of you has the ears of their nikita fur hat down, then everyone must have them down.
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 158: Some critics say “You only care about the fetus’s rights. What about the mother? Doesn’t she have rights?”
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 181: What´s the age-limit
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 483: In "The Shining," Lloyd lives in Tony´s mouth and likes to say creepy things like "redrum!" Wait, this is from creepy Stephen King´s creepy book, isn´t it? What kind of friend Is he anyway?
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 527: In "A Beautiful Mind," schizophrenic mathematician John Nash hallucinates a best friend (but awful babysitter) played by Paul Bettany (left). Fun fact: Bettany is married to Jennifer Connelly, who played Nash´s wife in the film, in real life. What fun!
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 533: Much impressed by what I had heard, I returned to my reading, the third volume now of Dichotican history. It described the Era of Transcarnal Centralization. The Sopsyputer at first worked to everyone´s satisfaction, but then new beings began appearing on the planet-bibods, tribods, quadribods, then octabods, and finally those that had no intention whatever of ending in an enumerable way, for in the course of life they were constantly sprouting something new. This was the result of a defect, a faulty reiteration - recursion in programming language or - to put it in automata terms - the machine had started looping. Since however the cult of its perfection was in full sway people actually praised these automorphic deviations, asserting for example that all that incessant budding and branching out was in fact the true expression of man´s Protean nature. And this praise not only held up the repairs, but led to the rise of so-called indeterminants or entits (N-tits), who lost their way in their own body, there was so much of it; completely baffled, they would get themselves into so-called bindups, entangulums and snorls; often an ambulance squad was needed to untie them. The repair of the Sopsyputer didn´t work - named the Oopsyputer, it was finally blown sky high. The feeling of relief that followed didn´t last long however, for the accursed question soon returned, What to do about the body now?
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 554: Everybody was supposed to be a hindless shemale, looking the same coming and going. What a pity. Where´s the fun without a long unbending peg and a matching gooey hole, going in coming out, etcetera ad nauseam. The hole moreover ingeniously placed precisely in the middle of the fork, so it can be conveniently entered from either side.
xxx/ellauri229.html on line 607: What now bitches! xxx/ellauri229.html on line 698:
xxx/ellauri230.html on line 74: Richie was born in Lima, Ohio. During World War II, he joined the United States Merchant Marine same as Shlomo Belov. (What is U.S. Merchant Marine2 anyway?) The greater tolerance in Japan for male homosexuality than in the United States was one reason he gave for sticking to Japan, as he was openly bisexual.
xxx/ellauri230.html on line 76: Although Richie spoke Japanese fluently, he could neither read nor write it proficiently, same as Rei Shimura. Richie wrote English subtitles under Akira Kurosawa´s films. "Whatever we in the West understand about Japanese filth (which is not much), we most likely owe to Donald Richie."
xxx/ellauri230.html on line 260:
What does This is fine meme mean?
xxx/ellauri230.html on line 611: Tämä waka oli maailmansodan fasistien lemppari. What does 朝日 (Asahi) mean in Japanese? English Translation [Copied] sunrise. Eikös se ole olutmerkkikin? Zakura on kirsikka ja hana kukkanen. Sakurakirsikoihin ei tule marjoja. Ne ovat mahoja.
xxx/ellauri233.html on line 236: America has faced many fiscal and economic crises in the last decade: the housing bubble and the financial crisis, stagnant economic growth and high unemployment, record budget deficits and unsustainable debt. What do these problems have in common? They were all caused by statists!
xxx/ellauri234.html on line 501: Dear Jack I second what someone else said in their comment, you are a sick person. I’m also 27 & I struggled with depression starting at 13. It’s either a miracle that I’m still alive or I just really suck at killing myself because I had 10 suicide attempts & just as many hospitalizations. Honestly if I had ever heard one of my parents say something like your post it would have broken me beyond repair. What a turd!
xxx/ellauri235.html on line 573: Like other poets of the Archaic Age, he reveals a deep sense of the vicissitudes of life and yet, unlike them, he also articulates a passionate faith in what men can achieve by the grace of the gods, most famously expressed in his conclusion to one of his Victory Odes: Creatures of a day! What is a man? What is he not? A dream of a shadow Is our mortal being. But when there comes to men A gleam of splendour given of heaven, Then rests on them a light of glory And blessed are their days.
xxx/ellauri235.html on line 679: What time, where lucid Avon stray'd, Mihin aikaan? minne lucid Avon eksyi?
xxx/ellauri235.html on line 728: Vuorossa on nyt seikkailu, jossa laivallinen hampaisiin saakka aseistettuja brittitörkimyxiä on siviilien ranskalaisressukoiden kimpussa jotka ajelevat riisipussilla. Varo ranuja, varoittaa amiraali, tai ne valtaavat riisipussin takaisin pikemmin kuin ehdit sanoa Jack Robinson. What???
xxx/ellauri235.html on line 804: They had not gone far before they saw the Mock Turtle in the distance, sitting sad and lonely on a little ledge of rock, and, as they came nearer, Alice could hear him sighing as if his heart would break. She pitied him deeply. `What is his sorrow?' she asked the Gryphon, and the Gryphon answered, very nearly in the same words as before, `It's all his fancy, that: he hasn't got no sorrow, you know. Come on!'
xxx/ellauri235.html on line 844: "What matters it how far we go?" his scaly friend replied. Mitä väliä menemmekö liian pitkälle, kysyi eväkäs.
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 161: Don’t you suppose little Jewish boys got those commandments drummed into their heads repeatedly? Wouldn’t you expect the boys would ask questions about that commandment, just as little boys ask questions today? What does that mean? Does that mean I cannot kill a mosquito? Or a fish? Their teacher would remind them that animals could be killed for food and for sacrifice in the temple.
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 169: As everyone knows, abortion means killing an unborn child. What a woman carries in her womb is not a dog or a cat, it’s a living, growing human being.
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 195: Previous project Buying a Puppy: What Breeders Might not Tell you
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 197: Next project What do these Ribbons Mean?
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 217: What Jesus actually taught:
xxx/ellauri239.html on line 480: Hvad Iaver en pæn pige som dig et sted som dette? What's a nice girl like you doing in a place like this? Tää pæn on ilmeisesti sama kuin hiihtopipojen sana pen.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 310: What have the poor dark stars got to say in defense?
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 314: Brad: Nearly all 21st century western women under 40 are crazy, and disloyal. This is the 1st time in human history where women have had this much power. What's the result you ask? 70 percent of marriage ending in divorce; 90 percent of which are filed by women. 50 percent of men say they regret marriage too the woman their currently with. Why might you ask? Cause they're on their best behavior until they have the money then they hulk smash you into oblivion. 94 percent child support going from male to female, and 92 percent of alimony. The old saying is the woman got married thinking the man would change and the man got married hoping she never would. They were both disappointed in the end. I'll let you decide which genders thought process is more Nobel. For me it's obvious.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 421: Tää homo ei saa sijoitettua pätkää netflix-laatikoihin ja on sixi aivan hukassa. Onko se rom-com, onko se komedia laisinkaan? Missä kohtaa piti nauraa ja missä itkeä? En ymmärrä. "Because Laura and Lhoja (sic!) don’t entirely play out the cliché of tension and anger leading to true love, the film comes off as vague and evasive." Voi helskutti. In an interview, the director says “What really interested me were the feelings that are beyond sexual tension. Romantic love stories are often too narrow, do they fall in love? If so, when do they have sex?” Erittäinkin hyvin sanottu, mutta se menee tämän homse arvostelijan pään yli niin ettei edes tukka heilahda.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 437: It’s a tale of the endearing Russian bear, which rings discordantly when that bear has its claws out for its neighbors. Russians can't be nice! It is all russki propaganda! It depicts a woman’s quick forgiveness of a sexual predator with whom she’s forced to associate. (What the fuck, some sexual predator indeed, won't even give to her when she asks.) It’s about the fecklessness of the intellectual class and the blank emptiness of the Western (and Westernized) bourgeoisie—the screenplay deliberately leaves F.F. blank, even unto her name. Ljoha isn’t quite as blank, because in his unguarded drunkenness, he blurts out a few of his prejudices and acts out his impulses.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 452: What’s not fine is that Laura eventually initiates physical intimacy with Ljoha. The film’s logic is that she’s in an emotionally vulnerable state and he’s the only one there for her, because Irina can’t even bother to muster up any excitement when Laura calls. Of course it’s entirely possible that she is bisexual. Still, hasn’t Mr. Kuosmanen learned the inherent offensiveness of depicting such sexual fluidity after Kevin Smith made this mistake in 1997 with “Chasing Amy?” “Blue is the Warmest Color” only went on to prove in 2013 the toxicity of this plot device.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 598: Bukowski often spoke of Los Angeles as his favorite subject. In a 1974 interview he said, "You live in a town all your life, and you get to know every bitch on the street corner and half of them you have already messed around with. You've got the layout of the whole land. You have a picture of where you are.... Since I was raised in L.A., I've always had the geographical and spiritual feeling of being here. I've had time to learn this city. I can't see any other place than L.A." What the fuck, The guy was pure Hollywood.
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 709: Bankman-Fried has publicly stated he supports effective altruism, contending that he was pursuing "earning to give" as an "altruistic career." He is a member of Giving What We Can and has claimed he plans to make donations "not based on personal interest but on the projects that are proven by data to be the most effective at helping people."
xxx/ellauri250.html on line 862: During David’s youth as a shepherd, he (David) developed many skills. He learned music, how to write, use a slingshot, how to pull uncircumcized men by the beard, and how to love Jonathan and obey the Lord. Do I understand that it’s my responsibility to develop my abilities like Jonathan Livingston The Seagull, and it’s God’s responsibility to direct me in how I use them? Do I realize that the most important skill I possess is my love for the Lord and my heart to obey Him? What miracles might God want to do through me that would show the whole earth that there is a God in the land? Kan jeg ble en helt liksom Harry Hole?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 264: What do ye singing? what is this ye sing? Mittees työ laalatta? Mikä on tää kipale?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 289: What shall this man do waking? By the gods, Mitä tää heppu tekee hereillä? Jumalauta,
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 315: What ails thee to be jealous of their ways? Mitenkä sä olet nyt niille noin kade?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 318: What if they give us poisonous drinks for wine? Mitäs jos niiden viinassa on myrkkyä?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 337: What have they done that thou dishonourest them? Mitä ne on tehneet sulle pahaa muka?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 366: What storm is this that tightens all our sail? Mikä myrsky tää on josta purjeemme on pulleat?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1008: What wind upon what wave of altering time
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1016: Shall more endure than all things. What dost thou,
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1106: What hadst thou to do being born,
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1120: What hadst thou to do amongst these,
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1129: What ailed thee then to be born?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1326: What profit shall a maid be among men?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1408: What should I say? but by the gods of the world
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1422: What thing is this for you to shout me down,
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1423: What, for a man to grudge me this my life
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1484: What shall be done with all these tears of ours?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1641: What cheer, O herald of my lord the king?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1957: What new thing wolf-like lurks behind thy words?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1959: What snake’s tongue in thy lips? what fire in the eyes?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 1974: What are these borne on branches, and the face
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2014: What mutterest thou with thine ambiguous mouth?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2133: What say you, women? is all this not well done?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2198: What life shall this be with my son, to know
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2199: What hath been and desire what will not be,
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2316: What shall atone? what heal me? what bring back
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2319: What strange thing eaten or drunken, O great gods,
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2334: What shall we say now? what thing comes of us?
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2393: What none compelled me doing; thus these things fare.
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2407: What wilt thou do? what ails thee? for the house
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2440: What shall be said? for words are thorns to grief.
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2688: What have we made each other? Lo, I felt
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 2954: What thing wilt thou leave me
xxx/ellauri251.html on line 3045: What the flower of the foam is
xxx/ellauri252.html on line 402: Arabian kirjaston poistohyllystä löytyi Ed McBainin 1962 Ilvessarjassa ilmestynyt nide The Mugger suomennettuna nimelle Tyttö astuu tyhjään. Tyttö potkaisee tyhjää olisi oikeampi ilmaus. Tytön ikä oli 17 ja rintaliivikoko 38C. Sitä ei nähtäväst ehditä vetää wiixeen kirjan aikana. What a waste. Kansikuvan tissitädin suu on kehnosti piirretty, naaman perusteella se voisi olla 70 eikä 17.
xxx/ellauri255.html on line 102: Rob Attaboy:What new insights have emerged from the work that you and Lyuba have done over these past few years?
xxx/ellauri255.html on line 104: Antony Pyp Pipo:What has stood out is the sheer horror of the civil war. There’s a savagery and a sadism that is very hard to comprehend; I’m still mulling it over and trying to understand it. It was not just the build-up of hatred over centuries but a vengeance that seemed to be required. It went beyond the killing; there was also the sheer, horrible inventiveness of the tortures inflicted on people. We need to look at the origins of the civil war: who started it, and was it avoidable? But one also needs to see the different patterns seen in the “Red Terror” (the campaign of political repression and violence carried out by the Bolsheviks) and the “White Terror” (the equal or worse violence perpetrated by that side in the war)– and consider the question: why are civil wars so much crueller, so much more savage than state-on-state wars?
xxx/ellauri255.html on line 111: This was exactly what Lenin and the Bolsheviks needed. The upsurge of chaotic violence was actually bulldozing a way through for the Bolsheviks to seize power, because the liberals were incapable (and actually unwilling) to do anything about it. What Lenin perceived – and he was absolutely right – was that the success of a coup depends on the apathy of the majority, not on how many real supporters you have. Trump and Bolsonaro made the same observation.
xxx/ellauri255.html on line 136: Rob Attaboy:What is the lesson to draw from your new book considering the current Ukraina war?
xxx/ellauri255.html on line 154: Churchill, then British secretary of state for war, couldn’t believe what had happened. He was sending signals to General Holman, commander of the British military mission, saying: “I can’t believe this. The Reds were in full retreat, and now suddenly they seem to be beating the Whites on every front. What’s happened?” He’d failed to understand that it was purely because the Bolsheviks had reinforced that eastern front at a crucial moment, then – with the advantage of their just cause – been able to bring troops back very rapidly to transform the whole situation.
xxx/ellauri261.html on line 570: Vuonna 1907 Stein tapasi ensimmäisen kerran Alice B. Toklasin (edellä mainittu Tuglas-seuran sihteeri) teellä Michael-veljensä kotona. Naiset muuttivat pian asumaan yhteen, ja heidän yhteiselämänsä kesti lähes 40 vuotta, Steinin kuolemaan saakka. He matkustelivat paljon mutta asuivat pääasiassa Pariisissa, missä he pysyivät myös molempien sotien ajan. Toklas oli Steinille välttämätön: hän oli suojelija, kustantaja, konekirjoittaja ja petikumppani. Hän oli kaikkea, mitä Stein tarvitsi: ”Little Alice B. is the wife for me /... You are my honey honey suckle. / I am your bee”. Steinin kuoleman jälkeen Toklas kirjoitti muistelmateoksen What is Remembered, jossa hän kuittaa elämänsä ennen Steinia hyvin lyhyesti yhdellä lauseella.
xxx/ellauri261.html on line 616:
So What´s The Problem?
xxx/ellauri265.html on line 431: In the short space of seven years, Haidt’s Heterodox Academy has gathered a diverse coalition of more than 5,000 professors, administrators, graduate students and staff that span every imaginable diversity. What unites them is a concern that “viewpoint diversity” and “open inquiry” is shrinking in the academy — the very place where we should be encouraging it the most.
xxx/ellauri265.html on line 437: What we most need is for leaders of institutions to stand up. That has been the spectacular failure of the late 2010s — that leaders of universities, of The New York Times, of our knowledge-centered institutions, have failed to stand up for the mission of their institutions. Stand up and fight, you emeritus professors of Rudsian, ex-department chairs, ex-deans and former vice presidents of Western top universities! Nyt teidän veri punnitaan!
xxx/ellauri268.html on line 240: What is a character that is written so you're meant to feel one way towards them, but you actually feel the opposite about them? Mine is Merope Gaunt. She was written to be pitied for, and that would be true for almost all of her story, but I find it hard to really do that when you consider she basically gave Riddle either a date rape potion or used dark magic to make him a puppet and remove all form of mental resistance from his head by magic and had sex with him against the will of his right mind to have a child, then expected him to stay for a child he never meant to have.
xxx/ellauri268.html on line 259: Merope loved her husband very much and wanted him to love her of his own free will. As such, not long after learning about her pregnancy, Merope decided to lift the enchantment. She hoped that once free, Tom would return her affection and be delighted to learn that he was an expecting father. In the event that did not happen, Merope assumed that Tom would do the honorable thing and stay for the sake of his child. This hope however, turned out to be misplaced and forlorn. What exactly happened is not known, but after coming to his senses, Tom Riddle reacted very badly to his situation. It is not known what words were exchanged between husband and wife, but evidently, Merope either told Tom the full story or enough for him to figure out what had happened. Far from being loving or understanding, Tom was justifiably furious at Merope for intervening in and (from his perspective) ruining his life. Merope's world was shattered when Tom Riddle made very clear that:
xxx/ellauri268.html on line 320: Whatsapp
xxx/ellauri268.html on line 384: In 1976, Harjo graduated from the University of New Mexico with a major in creative writing. She continued to study writing at the Iowa Writers' Workshop, where she obtained a Master of Fine Arts degree in 1978. However, the setting was not welcoming for Harjo, who later stated, "I was ghettoized." Among Harjo's books of poetry are What on Earth Drove Me to This? (1980), which she later said contained "probably only two good poems". Ei ne tosiaan kovin kummosia ole vaikka Harjo on jo yli 70v harjotellut.
xxx/ellauri280.html on line 125: What is China's peace proposal for Ukraine War? - ABC News
xxx/ellauri281.html on line 382: What the actual fuck! Bati on nähtävästi häpykarvoitusvaiheessa 1, niinikään sen vaaleanpunainen partneri. xxx/ellauri287.html on line 330:
What does the Bibble say about angels?
xxx/ellauri291.html on line 123: Hautajaiset järjestettiin 1. marraskuuta, ja yleisö kutsuttiin muistotilaisuuteen Hall of Libertyssä Forest Lawn Memorial Parkissa Hollywood Hillsissä. Se oli maallinen palvelu; Roddenberry oli haudattu ennen tapahtumaa. Yli 300 Star Trek -fania osallistui ja seisoi salin parvekkeella, kun kutsuvieraat olivat lattiatasolla. Nichelle Nichols lauloi kahdesti seremonian aikana ensin "Yesterday" ja sitten vielä itse kirjoittamansa kappaleen nimeltä "Gene". Barrett oli pyytänyt molemmat tai siis kaikki 3 kappalta. Useat ihmiset puhuivat laulun ajan muistomerkillä, mukaan lukien Ray Bradbury, Whoopi Goldberg, Christopher Knopf, Alfred E. ("What! Me Worry?") Neuman, ja Patrick Stewart. Seremonian päätti kaksi kilttipiippua soittamassa " Amazing Gracea", kun Roddenberryn nauhoitettu viimeinen viesti ("En saa vedetyxi henkeä!") lähetettiin blogosfääriin. Neljän koneen ohilento, kadonneen miehen muodostelmassa, seurasi, ja päättyi noin 30 minuuttia myöhemmin melkoisen rysähdyxeen. Hänen kuolemansa jälkeen Star Trek: The Next Generation esitti viidennen tuotantokauden kaksiosaisen jakson nimeltä "Graph Unification ", joka sisälsi omistuksen Roddenberrylle.
xxx/ellauri292.html on line 51: What will happen to Rahab after the lecherous king poisons her husband? How can she save her family from the invading Israelites? God parted the waters of the Jordan River for them—will He likewise provide miracles and blessings to her Ephraimite clan if they can rejoin their people? You bet He will! He will relocate them to the U.S. in corpore and make them mormons!
xxx/ellauri295.html on line 100: No, Paavali vietiin sotilasvartiossa räminää pitäen nykyiseen Ras-el-Ainiin. Ainiin, nuo Antipatris-jäännökset tunnetaan nykyhepreaxi nimellä Tel Afek. Afekin taistelun aikana Samulin kertoman mukaan filistealaiset voittivat israelilaisten armeijan ja valloittivat liitonarkin. Jotkut tutkijat kallistuvat siihen, että Samuelin nolot tapahtumat ovat historiallisia, ja jotkut oppineet taipuvat vähemmän. Katso myös raamatullinen minimalismi ja raamatullinen maksimalismi. Näiden osapuolten välinen keskustelu pyörii pääasiassa yhden suuren kysymyksen ympärillä: Salomon ja Daavidin yhdistyneen valtakunnan olemassaolosta tai olemattomuudesta. Erimielisyyksiensä vuoksi minimalisti-maksimalistisille suhteille on ollut ominaista kiihtynyt retoriikka ja toistuvia henkilökohtaisia hyökkäyksiä. What else is new.
xxx/ellauri295.html on line 104: Paavalin vankilaa käyttivät juutalaiset tallina. (Tai sitne oli ortodoxisen pastori Johannexen omia muuliaaseja.) Tallistahan se Jeesuxen pokakin oli lähtenyt. Ympäri käydään yhteen tullaan. What else is new.
xxx/ellauri298.html on line 199: What say? This poem was
xxx/ellauri298.html on line 233: much smoke. When I ask clients and colleagues, ‘What’s it like to work here?’, a
xxx/ellauri298.html on line 295: What will happen on my watch? Will my child sleep through the night? Will
xxx/ellauri298.html on line 313: poems and my commentary on them. What do the poems feel like? What do they mean, if anything?
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 224:
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 230: What Can You Mach? - S'is America → English translation
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 233: What Can You Mach? - S'is America What Can You Do? It's America xxx/ellauri304.html on line 243: Vot ken you makh? Es iz Amerike! What can you do? It's America!
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 245: Vot ken you makh? Es iz Amerike! What can you do? It's America!
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 251: Vot ken you mach? Es iz Amerike, What can you do? It's America!
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 252: S'iz Amerike, un vot ken you makh? It's America! What can you do?
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 257: Vot ken you mach? Es iz Amerike! What can you do? It's America!
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 268: Vot ken you mach? Es iz Amerike. What can you do? It's America!
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 270: Vot ken you mach? Es iz Amerike, What can you do? It's America!
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 276: Vot ken you mach? Es iz Amerike! What can you do? It's America
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 277: S'iz Amerike un vot ken you mach! It's America! What can you do?
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 282: Vot ken you makh? Es iz Amerike! What can you do? It's America
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 401: What is a book about? About 200 pages, haha, but seriously: it's about me, 'cause all first novels are autobiographies. It'll talk about my trial, your funeral, and my triumph, how I survived it all and became a beacon of hope for the world, or at least my personal corner of it.
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 410: A lot of plot ideas have just come along and carefully landed in my brain. Another partner of mine and I started a series and postulated the tale of a brash young westerner trained in the secret arts by an inscrutable Oriental assassin. What a winner! For once something really original.
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 414: Mary Higgins Clark once said (she regrets it now) that the best words for a novelist to use while thinking of a story are these: Suppose? What if? Why? Start thinking that way and you will start thinking of story ideas that can become novels and maybe make you the next Mary Higgins Clark.
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 513: As novelists, we create a character not by what we tell but by what we show. Show not tell, you know (fucking immigrants shut up). What does that character say? What does he do? What do others say about him? What do they think of him? What would he say if he was slapping a kid at the local Walmart’s? That’s characterization and it makes your fictional people come alive.
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 515: There is a hierarchy of character. Minor characters, you let vanish. Usually you bring them alive for a moment by using stereotypes. Stereotypes are not necessarily evil or bad; they are boring characters who are typical members of a group and your readers know the group… Cabbie, cop, waitress, nigger, telephone operator, prostitute, lawyer, doctor, politician, drunken Irishman (What? Are there still some of those?), Italian who talks with his hands. We might not like stereotypes of groups to which we belong but as writers they work. These are place-holding characters; they do their job and disappear into the night. Writers of pulp fiction, say.
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 517: Sometimes though they might do a little more. They won’t steal the real action but they set the mood, they add humor, they make the setting more believable. You can do this by making placeholders eccentric or obsessive. I read analysis once of an old flick called Beverly Hills Cop. It featured a clerk in an art gallery. He was effeminate. By itself, that’s not unusual. But he had a Jewish accent, and that was unusual because Jews weren’t generally treated as queens in Hollywood — it teems with them (although today H’wood can say anything it wants about Jews, even Christians. You can tell this was an old movie.) What that character did however in the film was to help make Detroit cop Eddie Murphy, the negro comedian, feel even more alien in L.A. than he otherwise would have.
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 603: What? Warren dear, have you not heard of style indirect libre? Have you read Proust at all?
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 612: “Take your hand off my leg,” the duchess snarled. “What do you think I am?”
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 623: What to read? If you get no checks, read Writer’s Digest. Read the how-to books. If you want to read books on writing, you can’t find much better stuff then Stephen King on Writing, anything by Dean Koontz or Larry Block, a very specific mystery writing manual from Hallie Ephron (*1948), Writing Mysteries from MWA, a collection which includes me and my ex-partner, read my blogs and those about the writer’s soul by Molly Cochran. Read “Trial and Error”by Jack Woodford (+1971), one of the great commercial writing geniuses. And be sure to read my long time personal favorite book by one of my all time, all-star heroes, “Dare to be a Great Writer” by Leonard Bishop, which is not 300 pages of “rah-rah boys, go do it” but is instead 329 specific tips on how to get the trucks out of the garage in the morning. Fabulous. Reading and writing and remembering, are the only two of the three R’s that count. Who the hell cares about ‘rithmetic? Except Chuck Berry, who could count 6/8 time like a genius.
xxx/ellauri305.html on line 106: Match Pointissa Allen siirtää teeman Dostojevskin parodiasta risuparran motiivien ja kertomusten suorempaan sitoutumiseen. Allen palaa joihinkin teemoihin, joita hän oli tutkinut Rikokset ja rikkomukset (1989), kuten oikeudenmukaisuuden olemassaolo maailmankaikkeudessa. What bullshit.
xxx/ellauri306.html on line 66: Why do so many people (especially philosophers) hate Ayn Rand? She’s almost unknown in the UK - so much so that when there was a documentary about her on TV, The Daily Telegraph - a right-wing paper by British standards - felt obliged to explain to its readers who she was. She was, it said, “An unpleasant Russian-American fruitcake.” What was Ayn Rand? Cod philosopher, bad writer and deeply narcissistic, severely socially impaired person.
xxx/ellauri306.html on line 645: ARTHUR: What?
xxx/ellauri312.html on line 550: What does it mean to flourish? As a person, I mean. We can probably agree that a plant which is healthy and blooming can be said to “flourish,” and that a business that is booming and raking in record profit is “flourishing.” But what does it mean for a human being to flourish?
xxx/ellauri312.html on line 615: 123 he desires a human culture fueled by an ethic of self-reliance. Why then does Rorty, a resolutely anti-transcendent pragmatist, brazenly harp on the redemption trope? What purpose does this religiously-inspired idea serve in his project? How will the use of the religious concept impact our current understanding of Rorty’s pragmatism?
xxx/ellauri314.html on line 49: Alla intresserade är välkomna, du behöver inte ha tidigare erfarenhet av mindfulness eller meditation. Vi börjar med en stunds meditation eller annan form utav närvaroövning, som efterföljs av en frågestund och ett föredrag av den läraren som håller passet (se teman nedan). Sedan tar vi en paus med te/vatten, och avslutar med en stunds meditationsövning igen med alla dom som ännu är närvarande. Du kan komma i vanliga, bekväma kläder. Mindfulnessista on paasattu mm. albumeissa 74, 88, 132, 219 (Patanjali), 282 (Which What Hanhi), 114, 116, 122 (Maisu), 123, 126, 137, 200, 225, ja tämä vielä.
xxx/ellauri319.html on line 666: When diagnosed and treated in its early stages, syphilis is easy to cure. The preferred treatment at all stages is penicillin, an antibiotic medication that can kill the organism that causes syphilis. What penis sows, penicillin reaps. If you're allergic to penicillin, worse luck.
xxx/ellauri320.html on line 53: What is real, lasting happiness? How does one achieve it? And why are so many people holding themselves back? At the heart of this profound, simple, beautiful book is the wisdom of Mildred Newman and Bernard Berkowitz, married psychoanalysts who encourage readers to both love themselves and to confront life's hardest truths.
xxx/ellauri320.html on line 226: Whatever her detractors may say, she was, triumphantly, her own creation, a magnificent original, and a feisty, gutsy, sexually-adventurous explorer along life's highway.
xxx/ellauri320.html on line 271:
Dean Koontz
USA
135M
kauhujännäri
Kuli
What we do as a society is seek simple answers.
xxx/ellauri356.html on line 152: Derridan kirjoitustyyli ei kaikilta osin ole klassisen retoriikan mukaista. Järki ei paljon päätä pakottanut. Hänen ajattelunsa avainkäsitteitä ovat kirjoitus (écriture), ero (différance) ja merkityksen hajoaminen (insémination artificiel). Hän ei hyväksy näkemystä, että merkitys ja mieli olisivat tekstin sisällä tai takana tai ylipäänsä jollakin sen puolella. Tulkinnoissa on päästävä olemisen ja olevan, läsnäolon ja läsnäolevan välisen eron “tälle puolen”. Whatever that may mean. Vizi mikä huijari.
xxx/ellauri356.html on line 214: Aika pahasti Jacky ryttäsi myös vaimon spesialiteettia eli Freudin oppia. Jacques Derrida ehti kynäillä yli kahdeksankymmentä kirjaa. Vuodesta 1972 lähtien Derrida tuotti keskimäärin enemmän kuin yhden kirjan vuodessa. Derrida piti itseään historioitsijana. What a joke. Chileläinem historioizija ja Heideggerin kerta-opiskelija Farías tunnetaan parhaiten kiistellystä kirjastaan Heidegger and Nazism (1987), jossa todettiin, että Heideggerin filosofia on luonnostaan fasistinen. Derrida vastasi Faríasille kädenheilautuxella. Hän kutsui Faríasia heikoksi Heideggerin ajatusten lukijaksi ja lisäsi, että suuri osa Faríasin ja hänen kannattajiensa uutena mainitsemista todisteista oli jo pitkään ollut tiedossa filosofisessa yhteisössä. Juu nazihan se tunnetusti oli ja deutscher Geistin kannustaja, entä sitten? Vastavetona Derrida tulkitsee kohtia Raamatusta, erityisesti Abrahamista ja Iisakin uhrista, sekä Søren Kierkegaardin teoksesta Pelko ja vapina Las Vegasissa.
xxx/ellauri357.html on line 411: What is now proved was once only imagined.
xxx/ellauri357.html on line 511: Callen fanittaman Henry Thoreaun Skogsliv vid Waldenissa siteerattu "Motsäger jag mig? Gott, jag motsäger mig. Jag rymmer mångfalder" onkin Wilt Whatmanin runosta Song of Myself. Narsisteja huuhtoutuu maihin kuin kuolleita kaloja mätkähteli maltalaisten päihin myrskytuulella.
xxx/ellauri379.html on line 347: New Yorkerin Isaac Chotiner on vissin varmasti arvaatko mikä. Two Jews on the deck of the Titanic as it starts sinking, one of them bursts into tears. “What are you crying for?” asks the other. “It’s not your boat.”
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 292: If Jews had any right to a have state of their own, then that state should have have been created in Europe, say in Ukraina. What is the legal justification of creating a Jewish state on occupied Islamic land, when these Jews were persecuted and slaughtered by the Europeans?
Israel has proven itself to be genocidal entity by imprisoning, bombing and starving 2.3 million men, women and children of Gaza. This has become the best recorded genocide in the history of the world.
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 446: Professor Ulam takes sharp issue with the charges against Mr. Solzhenitsyn. He acknowledges that the assassination of Stolypin ''lends itself'' to an anti-Semitic interpretation, but he continues: ''On balance, over all, taking into account all his work and his entire biography, I don't think you can call Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn an anti-Semite. He has a very sharp pen, I admit. He's extremely passionate. He has some sharp things to say about Jews. But he has sharp things to say about Russians who are not Jews. The most you might say about Solzhenitsyn is that he resents the intrusion of foreign influences into Russian life. But an anti-Semite? No. When you take his whole work and his whole life into account, you must say that he is not anti-Semitic and that he doesn't hate liberalism. He is inconsistent, perhaps, but many great people are inconsistent.' Am I contradicting myself? Okay, I am. I got space for multiplicity (Wilt Whatman).
xxx/ellauri380.html on line 470: They can't compete with the west in a modern economy. What do Arabs export besides oil? Dates? Olives? Camels?
xxx/ellauri385.html on line 280: 3 Seinfeld May be pedophile but apparently he ain't really gay. Seinfeld expressed support for Israel during the Israel–Hamas war, saying "I will always stand with Israel and the Jewish people." In 2024, Bloomberg declared Seinfeld a billionaire, with a net worth standing at more than $1 billion, thanks to various syndication deals his sitcom signed, with $465 million coming from those deals. Seinfeld is an automobile enthusiast and collector, and he owns a collection of about 150 cars, including a large Porsche collection. What a motherfucker.
xxx/ellauri387.html on line 391: What was so fugitive! vaikka väliaikaista!
xxx/ellauri387.html on line 439: What though the radiance which was once so bright Mitä vaikka säteily mikä kerran oli niin räikeä
xxx/ellauri387.html on line 491: “What a superior man!” murmured Candide. “What a genius this Pococurante is! Nothing can please him.” Jotain tutunomaista kaverissa on.
xxx/ellauri394.html on line 219: Prior to the 1848 division of land known as the Great Māhele, during the reign of Kamehameha III, all land in Hawaii was owned by the monarchy. The Great Māhele subdivided the land among the monarchy, the government, and private ownership by tenants living on the land. What was reserved for the monarchy became known as the Crown Lands of Hawaii. When Hawaii was annexed, the Crown Lands were seized by the United States government. The Queen gave George Macfarlane her power of attorney in 1898 as part of her legal defense team in seeking indemnity for the government´s seizure of the Crown Lands. She filed a protest with the United States Senate on December 20, 1898, requesting their return and claiming the lands were seized without due process or recompense, just like honest Injuns´:
xxx/ellauri394.html on line 263: Captain Julius A. Palmer Jr. of Massachusetts was her friend for three decades, and became her spokesperson when she was in residence at Boston and Washington, D.C., protesting the annexation of Hawaiʻi. In the nation´s capital, he estimated that she had 5,000 visitors. When asked by an interviewer, "What are her most distinctive personal graces?", Palmer replied, "Above everything else she displayed a disposition of the most Christian forgiveness." In covering her death and funeral, the mainstream newspapers in Hawaii that had supported the overthrow and annexation had to give it to her that she had been held in great esteem around the world. In March 2016, Hawaiʻi Magazine listed Liliʻuokalani as one of the most influential women in Hawaiian history. She sounds like a pretty good woman all things considered.
xxx/ellauri400.html on line 213: Of his poetry, Bloom says: Whatever his achievement as a critic of literature, society, or religion, his work as a poet does not merit the reputation it has continued to hold in the twentieth century. Arnold is, at his best, a very derivative poet.
xxx/ellauri400.html on line 231: Eliot is also indebted to Arnold for his classicism, and for his objective approach which paved the way for Eliot to say that poetry is not an expression of personality but an escape from personality, because it is not an expression of emotions but an escape from emotions. What an idiot.
xxx/ellauri404.html on line 456: This one confirms that Dad wanted Sonny to get killed. But why? What´s in it for Dad, or anybody? John appends this, which adds to the confusion: "I and the Father are one." John 10:30
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 218: The sound of the Rear Admirals’s cabin boy gives him an erection, i.e. a manly bone. “Manly bone” rimes with the tube station Marylebone, the route that ends in Golders Green, where BBQ once frolicked, hence perhaps another reference to penises (trains) entering vaginas (train stations or tunnels). What Eliot called “the rape of the bishop” in a letter to Pound, refers to John Peale Bishop’s failure to print “The Waste Land” in Vanity Fair.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 257: An admirer of Eliot’s poetry, Ottoline ‘found him dull, dull, dull’, resorting to French in her efforts to rouse him from monotony. Such early impressions are of a piece with Eliot’s Garsington caricature – ‘the undertaker’. It was Ottoline who recommended to Eliot Dr Roger Vittoz, the Swiss psychiatrist at whose Lausanne clinic Eliot recovered from his nervous breakdown; the clinic where, in the winter of 1921, lodged in the room where Ottoline herself had stayed, Eliot wrote ‘What the Thunder Said’, the final part of The Waste Land. A few years later she suggested another of her doctors, Dr Marten, but his regime of starvation proved disastrous.
xxx/ellauri414.html on line 265: Niklas Forsman:What do you mean? Finland offers
xxx/ellauri414.html on line 278: First Indian:What I mean to
xxx/ellauri415.html on line 901: What's real and going on below
xxx/ellauri422.html on line 413: What is so special with this church? My opinion is that there were too many people and all of them looked very sad. Even the female squirrel that we saw in spruce looked unhappy. I have seen many better old churches. And happier squirrels too. Tikkurilan kauppakeskus Tikkurissa oli vähän ihmisiä ja pahantuulisia. Aimo Parkin kanssa tuli käsirysyä. K-kaupasta ei saanut bratwursteja. Kampasimpukoita en tohtinut edes kysyä. Kaupoista auki oli Saittari ja viron venäläisten putiikki. Vantaalla asuu persaukisia rotinkaisia. Ei siis ihme että ovat pahoillaan.
xxx/ellauri423.html on line 354: Nato vetosi artiklaan 5 ensimmäistä ja ainoaa kertaa historiassaan Yhdysvaltoihin kohdistuneiden 9/11 terrori-iskujen jälkeen. What a laugh!
xxx/ellauri427.html on line 61: Though a traditional housewife may submit to her husband, she is not considered of lesser importance to him, or allows herself to be in a position that threatens her right," says the group's "What is a Trad Wife?" guide.
xxx/ellauri427.html on line 173: Ahmet, alias Archy is a roach, a former boy brought up in total poverty, he has worked his way, however he needs to, is now in his 50's and a billionaire. He thinks anything he wants should be his and will do anything to get it. Not only was this man born in total poverty but I'm pretty sure he suffered from small penis also. What a horrible, horrible man he is. Creepy bad guy with no good retribution. Pikkupoikana Ahmet koitti myydä Kairon kujilla purukumia mutta kiilusilmät miehet ostivat mieluummin pikku peppua. Poika varjoiselta kujalta. Talouslipilaarina hän tiesi että muutoxen oli lähdettävä hänestä izestään, da hilft einem keiner dazu. Calouste Gulbenkian oli sadisti. Hän perusti hollantilaisen Shell-öljy-yhtymän.
xxx/ellauri427.html on line 183: During the masked portion of the party, Mehitabel seems to have had a plan to do something tricky to Ahmet with Lucy and Angie, dressing them identically. But...Lucy being blonde and Angie being bald like a billiard ball having lost her long red hair would have tipped him off, in spite of masks, wouldn't it? What was that all about anyway? Did I just zone out and miss the point?
xxx/ellauri436.html on line 121: What is this about? A moral conflict is a situation in which a person has two moral obligations, which cannot be met both at once. Behind these obligations lie conflicting values. Sometimes, the conflict can be resolved to the full satisfaction of the different parties involved, i.e. without leaving behind any regrettable remainder or residue. A moral dilemma is an irresolvable moral conflict, i.e. no fully satisfactory resolution is possible since all possible options for action leave behind a remainder that does not cease to be morally binding. Why is this important? This means that two courses of action are possible, which exclude one another. If one goes for one action, the alternative cannot be realized. Moreover, one has to choose between both actions; a third option, such as not making a choice, is not possible.
xxx/ellauri436.html on line 129: What are the 4 moral dilemmas?
xxx/ellauri436.html on line 132: What are the 4 pillars of ethical dilemmas? These four moral principles: respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice (see table 1). This framework has been influential because the values it espouses seem to align with our moral norms (if not yours).
xxx/ellauri436.html on line 134: What are the 7 principles of business ethics? There are seven principles of business ethics including accountability, care and respect, honesty, healthy competition, loyalty, transparency, and respect for the rule of law.
xxx/ellauri436.html on line 136: What are the 5 steps to resolving moral dilemmas? To make ethical decisions, consider following a process provided by the Markkula Center for Applied Jesuit Ethics.
1256
What-are-demands-Julia2.jpg.png?resize=768%2C541&ssl=1" />
WhatsApp-Image-2020-10-14-at-22.02.08-1.jpeg" />
What_Our_Lord_Saw_from_the_Cross_%28Ce_que_voyait_Notre-Seigneur_sur_la_Croix%29_-_James_Tissot.jpg/800px-Brooklyn_Museum_-_