This question leads to many other theological questions about the nature of hell, the problem of evil, and the salvation of people such as babies, the paperless immigrants, the intellectually disabled, and others who cannot understand the propositions of the gospel (e.g. Trinity). There is quite a bit I don’t know about this topic. But I do know God is loving, compassionate, and just. And I truly trust him to judge rightly, I'm sure I shall applaud his decision from my place among the lambs whatever it is. What he wills is good and conversely.
ellauri480.html on line 532: Kalle kehitti käsitteet koinherenssi ja inkoherenssi. In Christian theology, co-inherence is a concept related to the Trinity. Incoherence is another. Unlike the heads of Tolkien, Williams and Lewis, there is no conflict, loss of intimacy, or estrangement within the Godhead. Though the members of the Trinity are separate Persons (the Father is not the Son, the Son is not the Holy Spirit, etc.), they co-inhere; that is, they exist in and through each other. Whenever the Bible says that two different things are the same, they coinhere. According to Gunnar Uranian, co-inherence is the focus of all Williams´s novels.
ellauri501.html on line 660: "The Jehovah or Yahweh of the Old Testament seems to me to be a sadistic, bloodthirsty, genocidal villain. I cannot understand how He can be identified with the gentle Christ of the New Testament. Even through a mystic Trinity."
ellauri502.html on line 74:
16 sivustoa Ah, you are referring to Matthew 24:36! That clarifies it perfectly. In Matthew 24:36, Jesus says: "But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." Bible Gateway According to mainstream Christian theology (the Trinity), the Son (Jesus) and the Dad/Father (God) are the same divine being (God), yet the Son claims He does not know the time of His own return. This seeming paradox is explained through two main concepts:
ellauri502.html on line 82: 2 sivustoa To answer you directly: according to Christian theology, Jesus did not lie. However, it is completely understandable why it feels that way. If someone is one person but says "I don't know, only I know," it sounds like a contradiction or a cover-up. The cat is on the mat but I don't know it. To make sense of why this isn't considered a lie, we have to look at how the Trinity works and what it means to become human.
ellauri502.html on line 84: 1. Distinct Persons, Not One "Guy". In the Bible, the Father and the Son are not the exact same "guy" playing two roles (like a man who is both a father to his kid and a son to his parents). That is an old heresy called Modalism. Instead, the Trinity states they are distinct persons who share the same divine nature. Think of it like a three-headed dragon or three distinct mind-centers sharing one body of God. Person A (the Father) can know something that Person B (the Son) has chosen not to look at.
ellauri502.html on line 94: 1. The Trinity is Not One Head The "minds" are not sharing one physical human brain. In the Trinity, the Father and the Son are two distinct individuals (Persons) with their own awareness, but they are perfectly united in purpose and essence (God). The Father is in Heaven. The Son was walking on Earth. They are separate "centers of consciousness." The Son on Earth genuinely did not know what the Father in Heaven chose to keep to Himself.
ellauri502.html on line 106: 2. How it Applies to God In the Trinity, the blueprint is "God." There is only one divine blueprint in existence. But according to the Bible, that one blueprint is shared by three distinct individuals: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. What are they? God (one essence). Who are they? Three distinct persons with their own awareness.
ellauri502.html on line 115: 21 sivustoa You have just argued the exact same point that some of the greatest minds in history used to criticize the Trinity. You are 100% right: if "essence" just means a species, then all of humanity would be a "Ten-Billion-ity." And you are also right that saying we are all the same "species" is not a good reason to say we are all the same person. You and I are completely separate. We don't share a mind, we don't share a body, and we don't know each other's thoughts. This is exactly why theologians realize the "species" analogy breaks down. To fix this, they argue that God’s "essence" is completely different from human essence in three major ways:
ellauri502.html on line 121: 3. Back to Matthew 24: The Exception to the Rule. If their minds are always perfectly linked, we are right back to your original question: How could the Son not know the date? The only reason the Son didn't know is because He did something no other member of the Trinity did: He took on a human brain. The Father didn't become a man. The Holy Spirit didn't become a man. Only the Son became Jesus. By taking on a physical human brain, the Son temporarily "blocked" His own access to the shared divine database.
ellauri502.html on line 123: It would be like a gamer voluntarily putting on a blindfold while playing a team game. His teammates (the Father) can see the whole map, but the blindfolded player (Jesus on Earth) honestly cannot see what's coming next. So, you are totally right: if God were just a "species," the Trinity makes no sense and looks like a contradiction. The only way it works in Christian logic is because the Son intentionally limited His own mind when He came to Earth. Does adding the "human brain blindfold" idea help explain why the Son was uniquely blocked from knowing, while the Father still knew? Tekoälyn antamat vastaukset voivat sisältää virheitä. Lue lisää
xxx/ellauri013.html on line 327: Globalisaation apostoli, antikommunisti, laantumuksen vankka perätorvi oli tämä Pertti. Se eli niin pitkään et se ehti olla ex vaikka mitä, ex-convict 2x, exä 4x, ex-hegeliaani, ex-uskovainenkin. Orpo isoäidin lellikki, kotikoulusta suoraan Trinityyn homopoikain veljeskuntaan Apostolit. Peukutti vapaata rakkautta kunnes noin 3. vaimo Dora teki sille 2 käenpoikaa, se ei ollut vapaan lemmen tarkoitus. Bertie vaihtoi alle opiskelijansa Peterin (kyllä, se oli tyttö), uuden pörröisen kananpojan vielä eläkeikäisenä. Sillä oli tapana panna seuraava vaimo paksuksi ennen vaihtoa. Niiden poika Conrad oli elinikäinen yläluokan twit lorditalossa. Doran tytär kirjoitti muistelmissa Pertusta isänä, se oli kylmiö. Ei se oikeesti tykännyt kestään paitsi Bertistä. Se(kin) oli selvä narsisti.
xxx/ellauri123.html on line 707: Hän muutti perheensä mukana Englantiin 1919. Vladimir Nabokov opiskeli Trinity Collegessa. Hänen pääaineensa oli ensin eläintiede mutta vaihtoi sen pian ranskan- ja venäjänkieliseen kirjallisuuteen. Vladimir valmistui hyvin arvosanoin vuonna 1922. Aluxi aioin suorittaa tutkinnon psykiatriassa, mutta omituinen uupumus, olen niin masentunut tohtori, valtasi minut; ja vaihdoin englannin kirjallisuuteen, millä alalla niin monet pettyneet manque runoilijat lopettavat piippua polttavia tweed-asusina opettajina. - Öö mitä tarkoitat?
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 759: In 1981, Love was granted a small trust fund that had been left by her maternal grandparents, which she used to travel to Dublin, Ireland, where her biological father was living. She audited courses at Trinity College, studying theology for two semesters. She later received honorary patronage from Trinity's University Philosophical Society in 2010.
xxx/ellauri136.html on line 379: Lermontovin "Beggar" -vuosi kirjoitettiin 1830 pyhiinvaelluksen aikana Trinity-Sergius Lavraan, jonka runoilija teki ystäviensä ja rakastetun Ekaterina Sushkovan kanssa. Erään version mukaan Mikhail Yurievich otti todelliset tosiasiat työn pohjalta, vaikka hänen morsian kumosi nämä tiedot. Runon kirjoittamisen jälkeen kukaan kirjoittajan ympäristöstä ei ollut epäilystä siitä, kenelle se oli tarkoitettu, koska se oli Sushkovin teko, joka aiheutti runoilijan kirjoittavan runon.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 501: Hall aloitti kansankirkon saarnaajana vuonna 1919 Trinity Auditoriumissa Los Angelesin keskustassa. Alle vuotta myöhemmin Hall varasi ensimmäisen luentonsa, ja aiheena oli reinkarnaatio. Hall vihittiin kansankirkon ministeriksi 17. toukokuuta 1923 ja muutamassa päivässä hänet valittiin kirkkoherran "pysyväksi pastoriksi".
xxx/ellauri183.html on line 186: Clare Carlisle studied philosophy and theology at Trinity College, Cambridge, gaining her BA in 1998 and her PhD in 2002, and she remains grateful to Trinity College for the scholarship that supported her doctoral studies. Her travels in India after completing her PhD deepened her interest in devotional and contemplative practices. She is the author of six boox, most recently On Habit (Routledge, 2014), Philosopher of the Heart: The Restless Life of Søren Kierkegaard (Allen Lane / Penguin / FSG, 2019), and Spinoza’s Religion: A New Reading of the Ethics (Princeton University Press, 2021).
xxx/ellauri280.html on line 513: Vuonna 2019 kirjassaan Trinity: The Treachery and Pursuit of the Most Dangerous Spy in History Frank Close väittää , että "ensisijaisesti Fuchs auttoi neuvostoliittolaisia saavuttamaan amerikkalaiset" kilpailussa ydinpommista. Vuoden 2020 Atomic Spy -kirjan kirjoittaja Nancy Thorndike Greenspan antaa ponnisteluilleen vähemmän arvoa. Hiän ehdottaa, että neuvostoliittolaiset olisivat kehittäneet pomminsa jopa ilman hänen apuaan, "tosin luultavasti vasta vuonna 1951". Toisaalta Neuvostoliiton pommin aikaisemmalla kehityksellä saattoi olla yksi merkittävä etu maailmalle, voimatasapaino; kirjoittaja on vakuuttunut siitä, että tämä esti Yhdysvaltoja käyttämästä pommiaan Pohjois-Koreaan.
xxx/ellauri304.html on line 152: Haukka nimitettiin toukokuussa 2010 Trinity Western -yliopiston humanistisen tiedekunnan kunniatirehtöörixi Vancouverissa Kanadassa.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1131: That's because God is a Trinity: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1147: Unfortunately for you, this blog discusses the true and theologically sound doctrine of the trinity (and not the ridiculous concept of the trinity you espoused). The Trinity was not invented, debated, or discussed at the Nicean council, the Trinity was a theological doctrine that had been well established over a century before Nicea by scholars including Polycarp, Ignatius, and Justin Martyr.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1169: They wanted to kill Jesus because He Claimed To Be God, and that is where the doctrine of the Trinity came from the mouth of Jesus Himself. To deny the Trinity is to deny what Jesus said.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1170: And by the way, the Council of Constantinople did not finalize the doctrine of the Trinity, it brought up the question if Pneumatomachians (those who adhere to Macedonianism) were heretics because the Doctrine of the Trinity had been in place for almost 2 centuries at that point. This debate was finalized in the Council of Constantinople in 381. Our debate will be finalized a few lines further down, when I moderate you to hell.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1175: Doug is 100% correct that the Trinity did not originate from Nicea. But you believe the lies spewed by the LDS. The whole LDS faith is built on lies and fabrications by Joseph Smith, and has lived on lies ever since. Without lies the LDS would cease to exist.
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1176: As for the Trinity, it is easily found in Scripture. It isn't titled that, of course, because no one thought to give the idea a name. But I can prove by logic and the Bible that the Trinity was taught throughout the N.T.: (this)
xxx/ellauri410.html on line 1261: As for the Trinity being a form of pagan lunch meat - again it's just something you made up. If God is both masculine and feminine why is He only referred to in the masculine in holy scripture? If you really put some brain power behind your imaginary rants you would have considered John 4:24 when God's own son declared God to be Spirit, so he could easily be neither. Of course you didn't bother to consider John 10:30 when you made up your concept about Jesus lack of deity.
xxx/ellauri482.html on line 422: Calle syntyi Pietarissa englantilaisen kauppiaan poikana. Hänen veljensä oli matemaatikko Arthur Cayley. Väkäleukainen Arthur melkein todisti Cayleyn lauseen että kaikki ryhmät ovat vaan jotain permutaatioita. Anglosaxien mielestä Cayley oli maailman suurimpia matemaatikoita. Herra Pollecaryn Blackheathista käymästä koulusta Charles Cayley jatkoi opintojaan Trinity Collegessa Cambridgessa ja valmistui vuonna 1845 klassisesta tripos-musiikista kandidaatiksi. Hän opiskeli myös King's College Londonissa masixen Gabriele Rossettin johdolla.
xxx/ellauri486.html on line 582: Augustine of Hippo argues for the theological understanding that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son (the Filioque) most notably in his treatise De Trinitate (On the Trinity), specifically in Books IV, V, and XV. He argues that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, who act as a single principle of origin, rather than two separate sources.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 99: The exact word "Trinity" is not found in the Bible, but the foundational concept—that God is one Being who eternally exists in three Persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—is woven throughout scripture.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 112: Mainstream Christian theology relies on these exact verses to explain the Trinity. One Essence: Jesus perfectly mirrors, represents, and shares the divine nature of the Father (seeing Jesus is seeing what God is like). They are like two peas in a pod. God is a pod with three peas, samixet kuin Tupi, Hupi ja Lupi. Pyhis vaikuttaa kyllä muita pienemmältä, vähän kuin kahden muun koiralta. Distinct Persons: In the very same chapters, Jesus prays to the Father and speaks of being sent by the Father. If He were literally the same person as the Father, these interactions would not make sense unless god is schizophrenic.
xxx/ellauri493.html on line 116: That is actually a wonderfully memorable mental image! Jesus explicitly compares Himself to a mother hen in both Matthew 23:37 and Luke 13:34. So looking at God as a protective hen has deep biblical roots! Trinity is a chicken and egg question.
xxx/ellauri500.html on line 239: I see. Jeesuxen lapsista olis syntynyt Jehovalle kokonainen dynastia nenäkkäitä lapsenlapsia. Gerissim vuori olisi pian kuhissut kuin Olympos. Trinity olis natissut liitoxissaan. Jumalan pojat olis taas naineet maallisia naisia ja siitä olis tullut uusia jättiläisiä.
65