Roman">

ellauri153.html on line 860: Romanialaisen koalan ajatelma on oikeaan osuva: Ihmiset muuttavat myötätuntonsa ja käyttäytymisensä samalla nopeudella, jolla heidän etunsa muuttuvat. Venäjän mukaan Britannian vetoomustuomioistuimen päätös sallia Assangen luovuttaminen Yhdysvaltoihin on häpeällinen. Päätös tuo jälleen esiin anglosaksiliittouman kannibalistisen maailmankuvan. Jälleen kerran näemme Euroopan suosivan amerikkalaisia, ranskalaisten tiedotteessa todetaan. Amerikkalaiset pökäleet saisi vetää alas vessanpöntöstä britit vessapaperina.
ellauri155.html on line 663: Schmitt was born in Plettenberg, Westphalia, German Empire. His parents were Roman Catholics from the German Eifel region who had settled in Plettenberg. His father was a minor businessman. He studied law at Berlin, Munich and Strasbourg and took his graduation and state examinations in then-German Strasbourg during 1915. His 1910 doctoral thesis was titled Über Schuld und Schuldarten (On Guilt and Types of Guilt). A chapter on nazi guilt for holocaust has been added poshumously.
ellauri155.html on line 761: Finally, Calvin comes into the New Testament and shows how the Apostle Paul in Romans quotes this very text from Malachi to substantiate predestination. He quotes from Romans 9:15, itself another quote from the Old Testament: “For he (the Lord) saith to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.’” Why it´s always this damned Paul! I bet he had a drooping mouth like Jürgen Habermas. Calvin then later asks,
ellauri155.html on line 892: Like William James, his friend and mentor, he wrote philosophy in a literary way. Ezra Pound includes Santayana among his many cultural references in The Cantos, notably in "Canto LXXXI" and "Canto XCV". Santayana is usually considered an American writer, although he declined to become an American citizen, resided in Fascist Italy for decades, and said that he was most comfortable, intellectually and aesthetically, at Oxford University. Although an atheist, Santayana considered himself an "aesthetic Catholic" and spent the last decade of his life in a Roman residence under Catholic nuns. It felt a little like his young days under William James. He held racial superiority and eugenic views. He believed superior races should be discouraged from "intermarriage with inferior stock". Maybe that was why he had no kids.
ellauri159.html on line 565: There is no single document about the knightly code that lists all the virtues like this. It’s a modern interpretation of several documents that outline some kind of behavioral code for knights. Between 1170 and 1220 there were several documents outlining a code of conduct for knights but there wasn’t a decision made to use a single one. The overarching idea of these virtues was “chivalry”. Chivalry originated in the Holy Roman Empire from the idealization of the cavalryman. Military bravery, individual training, and service to others—especially in Francia, among horse soldiers in Charlemagne’s cavalry.
ellauri159.html on line 644: —Romans 5:3-5
ellauri161.html on line 851:

ellauri162.html on line 105: Louis Émile Clément Georges Bernanos (French: [ʒɔʁʒ bɛʁnanɔs]; 20 February 1888 – 5 July 1948) was a French author, and a soldier in World War I. A Roman Catholic with monarchist leanings, he was critical of elitist thought and was opposed to what he identified as defeatism. He believed this had led to France´s defeat and eventual occupation by Germany in 1940 during World War II. His two major novels "Sous le soleil de Satan" (1926) and the "Journal d’un curé de campagne" (1936) both revolve around a parish priest who combats evil and despair in the world. Most of his novels have been translated into English and frequently published in both Great Britain and the United States.
ellauri162.html on line 464: Treffit alkavat sanalla "Datum Romae (sen takana mainitaan aina yksi pääkirkkoista , yleensä apud Sanctumpetrum ) sub anulo piscatoris" (annettu Roomassa (lähellä Pietaria) kalastajan renkaan alla). Tätä seuraa pontifikaatin päivä, kuukausi, vuosi ja vuosi, joka on kirjoitettu leveästi toisistaan viimeisen rivin täyttämiseksi. - Paavi Leo XIII : n asetuksella . 29. lokakuuta 1879 tärkeimmät erot Breve ja Bulle poistettiin.
ellauri162.html on line 786: Molinism, named after 16th-century Spanish Jesuit priest and Roman Catholic theologian Luis de Molina, is the thesis that God has only middling knowledge of what is going on. It seeks to reconcile the apparent tension of divine providence and human free will. Prominent contemporary Molinists include William Lane Craig, Alfred Freddoso, Thomas Flint, Kenneth Keathley, and Louis Armstrong. What a wonderful world. Johnin mieliviini oli juuri Mölinä.
ellauri163.html on line 50: God of Vengeance was published in English-language translation in 1918. In 1922, it was staged in New York City at the Provincetown Theatre in Greenwich Village, and moved to the Apollo Theatre on Broadway on February 19, 1923, with a cast that included the acclaimed Jewish immigrant actor Rudolph Schildkraut. Its run was cut short on March 6, when the entire cast, producer Harry Weinberger, and one of the owners of the theater were indicted for violating the state's Penal Code, and later convicted on charges of obscenity. Weinberger, who was also a prominent attorney, represented the group at the trial. The chief witness against the play was Rabbi Joseph Silberman, who declared in an interview with Forverts: "This play libels the Jewish religion. Even the greatest anti-Semite could not have written such a thing". (You just wait for Philip Roth...) After a protracted battle, the conviction was successfully appealed. In Europe, the play was popular enough to be translated into German, Russian, Polish, Hebrew, Italian, Czech, Romanian and Norwegian. Indecent, the 2015 play written by Paula Vogel, tells of those events and the impact of God of Vengeance. It opened on Broadway at the Cort Theater in April 2017, directed by Rebecca Taichman. Eli ei Asch ihan pasé vielä ole.
ellauri164.html on line 518: At Thursday’s daily Mass (Thursday of the 18th week of the year) we Roman catholics read of the sin that excluded Moses from leading the people to the Promised Land. While there are some mysterious elements to it, one thing seems clear: the grumbling of the people got on Moses’ nerves. Indeed, grumbling often affects more than just the one doing the complaining. Through it, infectious negativity can be set loose. Even if only a small number are grousing, it can still incite discontent, anger, and/or fear in others. Yes, the people nearly wore him out. At a particularly low moment, when the people were complaining about the food, Moses lamented to God,
ellauri171.html on line 681: Romans 3:10-18 states the human race is utterly perverted and their actions will demonstrate it. It says no one seeks after God. “There is not even one!” We have all turned aside from God. Jesus said to the rich young ruler in Matthew 19:17 that there is only One who is good and He is God. Or all three of us actually, but we are really three Perssons rolled into one. Ympärileikkauxestakaan ei ole apua, kaikki juutalaiset ovat pahoja. Mitä etua sitten on juutalaisella, tai mitä hyötyä on ympärileikkauksesta? Ei niin midiä, nuppikulli näyttääkin rumalta.
ellauri171.html on line 683: The rest of Romans 3:10-18 describes our utter sinfulness and despicable behavior when we abandon God. That describes the inhabitants of Gibeah and the nation of Benjamin. Tämmöistä sakinhivutusta suositaan armeijoissa nykyäänkin. Jos syyllistä ei saada kiinni, pannaan koko komppania kärsimään. Hemmetti tää on kyllä alkeellista touhua. Kuka tästä enää haluaa mitään oppia? No vizi on että raamatun lukijoista on varmasti yli 50% just yhtä alkeellista porukkaa. Ei apinat ole mihkään muuttuneet, ne on sopeutuneet tähän.
ellauri171.html on line 693: The sixth lesson is that the homosexuals demonstrated that to them homosexual sexual activity is more desirable than heterosexual activity. However, heterosexual behavior is acceptable if that is all that is available to them. Romans 1:23-24, 26 and 28 teach that when people are given over to homosexual activity, it is a sign that they have rejected God. Homosexual activity is a more serious sin among sins, despite the claims of some. See the study, “Are some sins worse than other sins? – Are all sins equal?” Also notice that Judges 19:22 refers to the men of Gibeah as “worthless fellows.”
ellauri171.html on line 952: None of the inscribed tablets found in 1929 in the Canaanite city of Ugarit (destroyed c. 1200 BC) has revealed a cosmology. Any idea of one is often reconstructed from the much later Phoenician text by Philo of Byblos (c. 64–141 AD), after much Greek and Roman influence in the region.
ellauri171.html on line 956: The union of El Elyon and his consort Asherah would be representation of primordial Cronos and Rhea in Greek mythology or Roman Saturnus and Ops.
ellauri171.html on line 958: In Canaanite mythology there were twin mountains Targhizizi and Tharumagi which hold the firmament up above the earth-circling ocean, thereby bounding the earth. W. F. Albright, for example, says that El Shaddai is a derivation of a Semitic stem that appears in the Akkadian shadû ("mountain") and shaddā'û or shaddû'a ("mountain-dweller"), one of the names of Amurru. Philo of Byblos states that Atlas was one of the Elohim, which would clearly fit into the story of El Shaddai as "God of the Mountain(s)". Harriet Lutzky has presented evidence that Shaddai was an attribute of a Semitic goddess, linking the epithet with Hebrew šad "breast" as "the one of the Breast". The idea of two mountains being associated here as the breasts of the Earth, fits into the Canaanite mythology quite well. The ideas of pairs of mountains seem to be quite common in Canaanite mythology (similar to Horeb and Sinai in the Bible). The late period of this cosmology makes it difficult to tell what influences (Roman, Greek, or Hebrew) may have informed Philo's writings.
ellauri172.html on line 118: Juoni sijoittuu alkuperäiseen Sombrevalin kylään, jossa kaikki vallankumouksen tuloksena syntyneet voimat kohtaavat: katolilaisuus ateismia vastaan, aristokraatit nousevia vastaan, menneisyys nykypäivää vastaan. Romaani ruokkii suosittuja tarinoita, jotka on lainattu vanhoista normannin legendoista sekoitettuna enemmän tai vähemmän selkeään uskonnolliseen ja raamatulliseen kulttuuriin. Sombrevalin vanhan sairaanhoitajan Malgaignen huolestuttava luonne ilmentää siis arkaaisen ja taikauskoisen Ranskan selviytymistä, joka vastustaa luopiopapin ateistista rationalismia.
ellauri183.html on line 634: The war that Jewish scholars call The War of Varus (ei se "missä ovat legioonani" tunari vaan joku sen sukulainen). It is the war that took place in Galilee, Judaea and Idumaea just after the death of Herod which started with the massacre of the 3000 Jewish worshippers in the temple at the Passover of 1 B.C.E. Josephus stated that this war against the Jews which was directed by the governor of Syria, Quintilius Varus, took place in Palestine, but it has been a puzzle to historians that there appear to be no contemporary Roman accounts that justify it as occurring (ollenkaan tai ainakaan just tohon aikaan).
ellauri183.html on line 636: Joku jutkuäijä väittää että tässä sodassa (joka se mielestä tapahtui 3v myöhemmin kuin tapahtui) juutalaisia ei mätkinytkään Varuxen pojanpoika Varus, vaan Julius Caesarin pojanpoika Gaius Caesar! It also allows the historical statements of the New Testament concerning the nativity of Jesus to take on a new credibility. Jesus was born in 3 B.C.E. (within the period stated by most early Christian scholars) and we now find this substantiated by the records of Roman history. Kaikenlaista sitä pitäisikin uskoa. En luota nähin kavereihin pitemmälle kuin jaxan niitä heittää. Mitä vittua, Jeesus syntyi 3v ennen Kristusta? Mahootointa! Onkohan mistään myyttisestä tapahtumasta taitettu niin paljon peistä kuin tästä?
ellauri184.html on line 219: Modern readers of the NT often know little about the geopolitical world of first-century Palestine. It is commonly assumed that “the Jews” were an undifferentiated community living amicably in the part of the world we now call “the Holy Land” united in their resentment of the political imposition of Roman rule to which all were equally subject.
ellauri184.html on line 228: Politically Galilee had been under separate administration from Judea during almost all its history since the tenth century B.C. (apart from a period of “reunification” under the Maccabees), and in the time of Jesus it was under a (supposedly) native Herodian prince, while Judea and Samaria had since A.D. 6 been under the direct rule of a Roman prefect.
ellauri184.html on line 346: The town is cited in all four gospels (Matthew 4:13, 8:5, 11:23, 17:24, Mark 1:21, 2:1, 9:33, Luke 4:23, 31,7:1, 10:15, John 2:12, 4:46, 6:17, 24, 59) where it was reported to have been the hometown of the tax collector Matthew (aka Leevi, eri kuin evankelista), and located not far from Bethsaida, the hometown of the apostles Simon Peter, Andrew, James and John. Some readers take Mark 2:1 as evidence that Jesus may have owned a home in the town, but it is more likely that he stayed in the house of one of his followers here. He certainly spent time teaching and healing there. One Sabbath, Jesus taught in the synagogue in Capernaum and healed a man who was possessed by an unclean spirit (Luke 4:31–36 and Mark 1:21–28). This story is notable as the only one that is common to the gospels of Mark and Luke, but not contained in the Gospel of Matthew (see Synoptic Gospels for more literary comparison between the gospels). Afterward, Jesus healed Simon Peter´s mother-in-law of a fever (Luke 4:38–39). According to Luke 7:1–10 and Matthew 8:5, this is also the place where Jesus healed the boyfriend of a Roman centurion who had asked for his help. Capernaum is also the location of the healing of the paralytic lowered by friends through the roof to reach Jesus, as reported in Mark 2:1–12 and Luke 5:17–26.
ellauri184.html on line 516: In Classical and Hellenistic civilization, Ancient Greeks and Romans posed great value on the beauty of nature, physical integrity, aesthetics, harmonious bodies and nudity, including the foreskin (see also Ancient Greek art), and were opposed to all forms of genital mutilation, including circumcision—an opposition inherited by the canon and secular legal systems of the Christian West and East that lasted at least through to the Middle Ages, according to Frederick Hodges. Traditional branches of Judaism, Islam, Coptic Christianity, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, and the Eritrean Orthodox Church still advocate male circumcision as a religious obligation.
ellauri184.html on line 520: The Jewish and Islamic traditions both see circumcision as a way to distinguish a group from its neighbours. The Bible records "uncircumcised" being used as a derogatory reference for opponents[1Sam 17:26] and Jewish victory in battle that culminated in mass post-mortem circumcision, to provide an account of the number of enemy casualties.[1Sam 18:27] Just count he prepuces, or measure the size of the foreskin hillock. Jews were also required to circumcise all household members, including slaves[Gen 17:12-14] – a practice that would later put them into collision with Roman and Christian law (see below).
ellauri184.html on line 526: According to rabbinical accounts, he desecrated the Second Temple of Jerusalem by placing a statue of Olympian Zeus on the altar of the Temple; this incident is also reported by the biblical Book of Daniel, where the author refers to the statue of the Greek god inside the Temple as "abomination of desolation". Antiochus´ decrees and vituperation of Judaism motivated the Maccabean Revolt; the Maccabees reacted violently against the forced Hellenization of Judea, destroyed pagan altars in the villages, circumcised boys, and forced Hellenized Jews into outlawry. The revolt ended in the re-establishment of an independent Jewish kingdom under the Hasmoneans, until it turned into a client state of the Roman Republic under the reign of Herod the Great (37–4 BCE).
ellauri184.html on line 528: Classical, Hellenistic, and Roman culture found circumcision to be cruel and repulsive. In the Roman Empire, circumcision was regarded as a barbaric and disgusting custom. The consul Titus Flavius Clemens was condemned to death by the Roman Senate in 95 CE for, according to the Talmud, circumcising himself and converting to Judaism. The Emperor Hadrian (117–138) forbade circumcision. Overall, the rite of circumcision was especially execrable in Classical civilization, also because it was the custom to spend an hour a day or so exercising nude in the gymnasium and in Roman baths, therefore Jewish men did not want to be seen in public deprived of their foreskins.
ellauri184.html on line 532: However, there were also many Jews, known as "Hellenizers", who viewed Hellenization and social integration of the Jewish people in the Greco-Roman world favourably, and pursued a completely different approach: accepting the Emperor´s decree and even making efforts to restore their foreskins to better assimilate into Hellenistic society. The latter approach was common during the reign of Antiochus, and again under Roman rule. The foreskin was restored by one of two methods, that were later revived in the late 20th century; both were described in detail by the Greek physician Aulus Cornelius Celsus in his comprehensive encyclopedic work De Medicina, written during the reign of Tiberius (14-37 CE). The surgical method involved freeing the skin covering the penis by dissection, and then pulling it forward over the glans; he also described a simpler surgical technique used on men whose prepuce is naturally insufficient to cover their glans. The second approach, known as "epispasm", was non-surgical: a restoration device which consisted of a special weight made of bronze, copper, or leather (sometimes called Pondus Judaeus, i. e. "Jewish burden"), was affixed to the penis, pulling its skin downward. Over time, a new foreskin was generated, or a short prepuce was lengthened, by means of tissue expansion. Martial also mentioned the instrument in Epigrammaton (Book 7:35).
ellauri184.html on line 534: The Apostle Paul referred to these practices in his letters, saying: "Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised."[1Cor 7:18] But he also explicitly denounced the forcing of circumcision upon non-Jews, rejecting and condemning those Judaizers who stipulated the ritual to Gentile Christians, labelling such advocates as "false brothers"[Gal 2:4] (see below). In the mid-2nd century Rabbinical Jewish leaders, due to increasing cases of foreskin restorations in Roman Empire, introduced a radical method of circumcision, the periah, that left the glans totally uncovered and sew the remaining skin. The new method became immediately the only valid circumcision procedure, to ensure that a born Jew will remain circumcised and avoiding risk of restoring the foreskin. Operations became mostly irreversible.
ellauri184.html on line 622: In summary, the following understanding of biblical history seems plausible: 1. Although the Sanhedrin had the right to condemn Jesus to death and execute the sentence, it seemed opportune for various reasons to have the governor render this verdict. Moreover, although the Sanhedrin and the Roman governor had very diverse perspectives on Jesus, their interests finally converged, which led to Pilate’s condemnation of Jesus on grounds of unproven political charges.
ellauri184.html on line 629: b) Each of these unusual acts of behavior could individually have warranted the death penalty according to either Jewish or Roman law.
ellauri184.html on line 631: c) A political twist could be ascribed to each of these issues so as to obtain a capital sentence from the Roman governor. The Sanhedrin took on this task.
ellauri184.html on line 636: In other words, we can perceive Jesus as an outsider whose words and deeds were blasphemous according to Jewish law and seditious according to Roman law. I only briefly consider the well-known reproaches, and it goes without saying that the topics overlap.
ellauri184.html on line 638: If it is correct that the charge of blasphemy was brought forward (i.e., that Jesus claimed to be the eschatologically defined Son of Man, which seems to be the main reason for his execution in Jewish understanding), it would be easy to ascribe a political implication to this charge. This line of political argumentation is most clearly expressed in Luke 23.2: “We found this man perverting our nation, forbidding us to pay taxes to the emperor, and saying that he himself is the Messiah. The use of the death penalty confirms this political charge (crimen laesae maiestatis). Crucifixion as a Roman form of execution was reserved for slaves and peregrines who were involved in insurrections. The subtitle on the cross (ho basileus ton Iudaion, Iesus Nazarenus rex Iudaeorum, INRI), if it is historical, corroborates this particular charge.
ellauri184.html on line 648: Matthew and Mark make it clear that some people – including the politically and legally decisive Roman magistrate – could have perceived him as such a political activist (titulus crucis!). Again, we see that it is not necessarily Jesus’s concrete behavior, but rather the perception that counts.
ellauri184.html on line 651: To the average inhabitant of the Roman Empire, the manifold itinerant groups of magicians, sophists, cynics, other philosophers, astrologers, prophets, and eventually also Christians, must have appeared basically the same. These oscillating and enigmatic figures were simultaneously admired and despised for their "otherness". Why was Jesus able to appear as a radical itinerant preacher? He did not call for a political upheaval. Nevertheless, his messianic “program” was radical in its postulation of a proximity to God that had hitherto been unheard of and was based on the deliberate breaking of taboos and social conventions.
ellauri184.html on line 655: The Romans regarded him as a political dissident, or an insurgent – which the word lestes/latro appropriately captured – via the claim that he was King of the Jews, a claim that he never denied. Jesus’s hobo life testified to his calling as a prophet and radical wandering charismatic who constantly transgressed social boundaries. These multi-faceted processes of marginalization that Jesus partly took on voluntarily and partly endured led – in the brutal logic of the time – to his crucifixion as an outsider.
ellauri184.html on line 673: Roman governor at the same time as Jesus, and
ellauri184.html on line 773: Jose Saramago is an atheist. This should be enough warning for everyone that desires to read the book. It is very explicit and so religion it’s exposed at its weakest and God as a character is revealed. I come from a Roman-Catholic background but I still wanted to read it, ever since the Gnostic gospel where Jesus childhood is revealed and he changes from a mischievous badly behaved kid to the Jesus from the new testament I wanted to see Saramago’s take on it. Saramago is such a master of words that he makes every bit of faith look totally illogical.
ellauri185.html on line 408: Pinker was born in Montreal, Quebec, in 1954, to a middle-class Jewish family. His grandparents emigrated to Canada from Poland and Romania in 1926, and owned a small necktie factory in Montreal. His father was a lawyer. His mother eventually became a high-school vice-principal. His brother is a policy analyst for the Canadian government, while his sister, Susan Pinker, is a psychologist and writer who authored The Sexual Paradox and The Village Effect.
ellauri185.html on line 822:

Romaanien jalostava vaikutus

ellauri190.html on line 76: It is unclear when people other than the Brodnici and Berladnici (which had a Romanian origin with large slavic influences) began to settle in the lower reaches of major rivers such as the Don and the Dnieper after the demise of the Khazar state. Their arrival is unlikely before the 13th century, when the Mongols broke the power of the Cumans, who had assimilated the previous population on that territory. It is known that new settlers inherited a lifestyle that long pre-dated their presence, including that of the Turkic Cumans and the Circassian Kassaks.
ellauri190.html on line 239: During the 9th century, “Varangians” (Vikings) began to serve as a kind of Praetorian Guard to the East Roman emperors. Tästä kertoo jännittävästi Mika Waltarin historiallinen romaani Mikael Karvajalka, joka taitaa olla meillä jossakin. To reach the city of Constantinople, they sailed from what today is called the Gulf of Finland up the Neva river to the lakes Ladoga and Ilmen and then to the Western Dvina and the Dnipro, going all the way down to the Black Sea. By the mid-9th century, they settled around and in Kyiv and founded their own dynasty of the descendants of Rurik. A grandson of Rurik, Svyatoslav (Sfendosleif) greatly expanded his realm to the east and south, while his mother Olga (Helga) traveled to Constantinople and was baptized Christian. Svyatoslav’s son, Volodymyr (Waldemar) married a daughter of the Eastern Roman emperor, was baptized, and baptized all his subjects in the year 988. (Back then, the city of Moscow, or the country now known as Russia – Россия – did not even exist, so there!) Over the next centuries, the “Rurikids” gradually lost their Scandinavian identity, marrying women of the Slavic, Hungarian, Greek, and Turkic ethnicities.
ellauri190.html on line 259: In the late 12th and the 13th century, the center of Rus-Ukraine moved from Kyiv to what is now northwest and west of the country, the regions of Volyn and Halychyna (Galitzia). A mighty ruler called Prince (or Duke) Danylo Romanovych, even though an Eastern Orthodox by faith, was crowned King Danylo of Rus by a Pope’s Legate. King Danylo’s capital was the city of Kholm (now Chełm, Poland). He built a magnificent city of Lviv (“The Lion’s”) for his son, Lev (Leo). Lviviä pommitetaan paraikaa rankasti.
ellauri190.html on line 299: Cossack numbers increased when the warriors were joined by peasants escaping serfdom in Russia and dependence in the Commonwealth. Attempts by the szlachta to turn the Zaporozhian Cossacks into peasants eroded the formerly strong Cossack loyalty towards the Commonwealth. The government constantly rebuffed Cossack ambitions for recognition as equal to the szlachta. Plans for transforming the Polish–Lithuanian two-nation Commonwealth into a Polish–Lithuanian–Ruthenian Commonwealth made little progress, due to the unpopularity among the Ruthenian szlachta of the idea of Ruthenian Cossacks being equal to them and their elite becoming members of the szlachta. The Cossacks' strong historic allegiance to the Eastern Orthodox Church also put them at odds with officials of the Roman Catholic-dominated Commonwealth. Tensions increased when Commonwealth policies turned from relative tolerance to suppression of the Eastern Orthodox Church after the Union of Brest. The Cossacks became strongly anti-Roman Catholic, an attitude that became synonymous with anti-Polish. Did that make them any more pro-Russian? Naah.
ellauri190.html on line 303: Novorossiya (Russian: Новороссия, tr. Novorossija, IPA: [nəvɐˈrosːʲɪjə] (audio speaker iconlisten); Ukrainian: Новоросія, romanized: Novorosija; Romanian: Noua Rusie, Polish: Noworosja), literally New Russia, is a historical term of the Russian Empire denoting a region north of the Black Sea. In Ukraine the territory was better known as Stepovyna (Steppeland) or Nyz (Lower land). It was formed as a new imperial province of Russia (Novorossiya Governorate) in 1764 from military frontier regions along with parts of the southern Hetmanate in preparation for war with the Ottomans. Bessarabit kazoivat sivusta ja soittelivat Klezmeriä.
ellauri190.html on line 381: Scipio Africanus, also known as Scipio the African, Scipio Africanus-Major, Scipio Africanus the Elder and Scipio the Great, was a Roman general and later consul who is often regarded as one of the greatest generals and military strategists...
ellauri190.html on line 389: Pompey (the Great), was a distinguished and ambitious Roman military leader, provincial administrator and politician of the 1st century BC, the period of the Late Republic. Hailing from an Italian provincial background, Pompey first disting...
ellauri190.html on line 392: Julius Caesar, Rise of the Roman Empire
ellauri190.html on line 393: Gaius Julius Caesar is remembered as one of history's greatest generals and a key ruler of the Roman empire. As a young man he rose through the administrative ranks of the Roman republic, accumulating power until he was elected consul in 59...
ellauri190.html on line 401: Roman Emperors
ellauri190.html on line 402: Aurelian, 44th Roman Emperor
ellauri190.html on line 403: Aurelian was the 44th Emperor of the Roman Empire from 270 to 275. Born in humble circumstances, he rose through the military ranks to become emperor. During his reign, he defeated the Alamanni after a devastating war. He also defeated the...
ellauri190.html on line 408: Zenobia was a 3rd-century Queen of the Palmyrene Empire in Syria, who led a famous revolt against the Roman Empire. The second wife of King Septimius Odaenathus, Zenobia became queen of the Palmyrene Empire following Odaenathus' death in 26...
ellauri190.html on line 428: Charlemagne, meaning Charles the Great, was King of the Franks from 768 and Emperor of the Romans (Imperator Romanorum) from 800 to his death in 814. He expanded the Frankish kingdom into an empire that incorporated much of Western and Cent...
ellauri190.html on line 431: Holy Roman Emperors
ellauri190.html on line 432: Otto The Great, Holy Roman Emperor
ellauri190.html on line 433: Otto I, traditionally known as Otto the Great, was German king from 936 and Holy Roman Emperor from 962 until his death in 973. He was the oldest son of Henry I the Fowler and Matilda. Otto inherited the Duchy of Saxony and the kingship...
ellauri191.html on line 325: Romain_Rolland_1915.jpg" class="image">Romain Rolland 1915.jpg" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/Romain_Rolland_1915.jpg/75px-Romain_Rolland_1915.jpg" decoding="async" width="75" height="106" srcset="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/Romain_Rolland_1915.jpg/113px-Romain_Rolland_1915.jpg 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/Romain_Rolland_1915.jpg/150px-Romain_Rolland_1915.jpg 2x" data-file-width="280" data-file-height="396" />
ellauri191.html on line 327: Romain_Rolland" title="Romain Rolland">Romain Rolland
ellauri192.html on line 53: Trubetzkoy oli strukturalismin patriarkkoja Roman Jakobsonin kaa, jota Lévi-Strauss koitti kaupata myös antropologiaan. Kielitieteessä se meni kaupaxi kuin siimaa, aina Chomskyyn saakka, joka antoi sille kuoliniskun transformaatioilla. Sillä kuten muistetaan, strukturalismin komplexisuus jää Chomskyn luokkaan 2. Trubetzkoyn fonologia hoituu enimmäxeen vielä yxinkertaisemmilla, luokan 3 äärellisillä automaateilla, joiden parissa Kimmo Koskenniemi jaxoi puuhastella koko uransa. Vaikka mitä väliä noilla Chomskyn yläluokilla on tekoälyn kannalta? Nehän perustuu äärettömyyden idealisaatioon. Neuroverkot osoittavat ettei sellaisia enää tarvita. Ajamalla äärellisen tilan mallia liukuluvuilla voi tavallisen nörtin pelikoneen grafiikkakorteilla simuloida aapan aivotoimintaa niin hyvin ettei sen oma aivokuori pysy mukana. Kukas sitä enempää älyä voi enää vaatia?
ellauri192.html on line 55: The Prague linguistic circle included the Russian émigrés Roman Jakobson, Nikolai Trubetzkoy, and Sergei Karcevskiy, as well as the famous Czech literary scholars René Wellek and Jan Mukařovský. The instigator of the circle, and its first president until his death in 1945, was the Czech linguist Vilém Mathesius. After the Czechoslovak coup d'état of 1948, the circle was disbanded in 1952 (another marked year), but the Prague School continued as a major force in linguistic functionalism.
ellauri192.html on line 81: His universalizing structuralist theory of phonology, based on a markedness hierarchy of distinctive features, achieved its canonical exposition in a book published in the United States in 1951, jointly authored by Roman Jakobson, C. Gunnar Fant and Morris Halle.
ellauri192.html on line 623: In the days of the early church, both the Jews and the Romans were hostile toward Christians, so they often met secretly in houses for prayer and worship. One such house in Jerusalem belonged to Mary, the mother of Mark. Certain tradition states that Mary’s was the same house where the disciples celebrated the Last Supper with Christ.
ellauri192.html on line 665: Mr. Seifert's memoirs were published in English in September 1981 by sixty-eight publishers, plus in the Czech language by a Czech emigre publishing house in Canada, and they were published in several installments in a Czech-language journal. A portion of the memoirs were published in English in the 1983 issue of Cross Currents, a yearbook of Central European Culture, published by the Department of Slavic Langagues at the University of Michigan. The selection, titled "Russian Bliny," is about Roman Jakobson, a Russian scholar who emigrated to Czechoslovakia after World War I and came to the United States during World War II. In actual fact, they were Ukrainian bliny, another case of cultural appropriation.
ellauri192.html on line 672: Demetrius's descendants continued to rule the town of Trubetsk (Troubchevsk) until the 1530s, when they had to convert to Roman Catholicism or leave their patrimony and settle in Moscow. They chose the latter, and were accepted without ceremony at the court of Vasili III of Russia.
ellauri192.html on line 706: Now, the invasive Chinese sleeper is widely distributed in the freshwaters of Eastern and Central European countries, such as Belarus, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Moldova,Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Serbia and Ukraine, where it has high climatic suitability and may continue invasion in the future (Reshetnikov and Ficetola, 2011). In Ukraine, theChinese sleeper was first found in the upper Dniester River basin in 1980 where it was introduced in the 1970s (Reshetnikov, 2009). It first occurred in the Dnieper river basin near Kievin 2001, and in the Ros’ River (right tributary of the Dnieper River, downstream of Kiev) in2005 (Sabodash et al., 2002; Kutsokon and Negoda, 2006; Kutsokon, 2010). In the DanubeRiver basin the Chinese sleeper was first recorded in 1995–1996 in the Latorica River, westernUkraine (a part of the western Ukrainian population of the Chinese sleeper), but only in 2011in the Danube delta (Sivokhop, 1998; Kvach, 2012). This fish is currently found in differentparts of the upper streams of the Dniester basin, Transcarpathian waters (Danube basin), in the Dnieper River, and in the Danube River delta.
ellauri194.html on line 172: Viiva Luomi kulkee Rumolan kasvimaalla ja arvioi tuhoja. Romanesco-kaalien fraktaalimainen kuvio on lumen ja jäähileen peitossa. Porkkanat saattavat selvitä paremmin. Maa ei ole vielä jäätynyt. Lumen seassa mönkii hyttystä muistuttavia hyönteisiä. Ällöjä!
ellauri194.html on line 250: Early Christian writers (e.g. Eusebius) frequently identified Gog and Magog with the Romans and their emperor. After the Empire became Christian, Ambrose (d. 397) identified Gog with the Goths, Jerome (d. 420) with the Scythians, and Jordanes (died c. 555) said that Goths, Scythians and Amazons were all the same; he also cited Alexander's gates in the Caucasus. The Byzantine writer Procopius said it was the Huns Alexander had locked out, and a Western monk named Fredegar seems to have Gog and Magog in mind in his description of savage hordes from beyond Alexander's gates who had assisted the Byzantine emperor Heraclius (610–641) against the Muslim Saracens.
ellauri194.html on line 692:

Romaanit

ellauri196.html on line 376: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 1: Sarastus. WSOY 1917. Lainaa!
ellauri196.html on line 378: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 2: Aamu. WSOY 1917
ellauri196.html on line 380: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 3: Nuorukainen. WSOY 1917
ellauri196.html on line 382: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 4: Kapinoitsija. WSOY 1917
ellauri196.html on line 386: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 6: Antoinette. WSOY 1918
ellauri196.html on line 388: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 7: Saman katon alla. WSOY 1918
ellauri196.html on line 392: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 8: Ystävättäriä. WSOY 1919
ellauri196.html on line 394: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 9: Palava pensas. WSOY 1919
ellauri196.html on line 396: Romain Rolland: Jean Christophe 10: Uusi työpäivä. WSOY 1919
ellauri197.html on line 649: By the age of 12, Browning had written a book of poetry, which he later destroyed for want of a publisher. After attending one or two private schools and showing an insuperable dislike of school life, he was educated at home by a tutor, using the resources of his father's library. By 14 he was fluent in French, Greek, Italian and Latin. He became an admirer of the Romantic poets, especially Shelley, whom he followed in becoming an atheist and a vegetarian (and a bisexual). At 16, he studied Greek at University College London, but left after his first year. His parents' evangelical faith prevented his studying at either Oxford or Cambridge University, both then open only to members of the Church of England. He had inherited substantial musical ability through his mother, and composed arrangements of various songs. He refused a formal career and ignored his parents' remonstrations by dedicating himself to poetry. He stayed at home until the age of 34, financially dependent on his family until his marriage. His father sponsored the publication of his son's poems. Varsinainen vanhapiika, neiti-ihminen.
ellauri198.html on line 778: But something of the conclusion can be surmised here, however tentatively. Roland's equivocal triumph is an instance of Kierkegaardian "repetition" rather than of Platonic "recollection" on Hegelian "mediation," if only because the Romantic trope-upon-a-trope or transumption leads to a projective or introjective stance of which Kierkegaard is the conscious anti-Platonic and anti-Hegelian theorist. Precisely what Roland refuses is the Golgotha of Absolute Spirit that Hegel proclaims at the very close of his Phenomenology:
ellauri198.html on line 881: Hyperion, a Fragment is an abandoned epic poem by 19th-century English Romantic poet John Keats. It was published in Lamia, Isabella, The Eve of St. Agnes, and Other Poems (1820). It is based on the Titanomachia, and tells of the despair of the Titans after their fall to the Olympians. Keats wrote the poem from late 1818 until the spring of 1819, when he gave it up as having "too many Miltonic inversions." He was also nursing his younger brother Tom, who died on 1 December 1818 of tuberculosis.
ellauri198.html on line 918: Arthur Symons (n.h.) described the poem as a "sort of spiritual biography" in the way that it describes the feelings and emotions of the poet, rather than the actions. Isobel Armstrong (n.h.) argued that the poem was Browning's attempt to "institutionalize" himself as a Romantic poet. Browning described himself within the poem as "priest and prophet" and therefore gave himself both the meaning and purpose that he was seeking as a young man. Vitun pappi ja profeetta, ansaizisi potkun perseeseen. Tää narsistinen suollos ei kelpaa mihinkään. Ei maxa vaivaa edes siteerata.
ellauri203.html on line 66: Kolmiomittaus - Romanttisissa suhteissa sekä ystävyyssuhteissa ja työtilanteissa narsistit yhtäkkiä "hiljenevät" kanssasi, kieltävät sinulta aikaa, energiaa, kiintymystä ja kiitosta, samalla kun he tekevät selväksi tai suoraan toteavat, että nämä asiat ovat nyt "lahjoiettu" jollekin toiselle. He kirjaimellisesti ottavat yhteyttä ilmaistakseen, että he hengailivat jonkun toisen kanssa. Mitä väliä sillä on? He todella uskovat, että saada olla se "joku muu", jota he käyttävät hyväxi, on jotain, josta kilpailla.
ellauri203.html on line 68: Romanttisesti he näkevät suorastaan vaivaa "lipsahtaaxeen" ja paljastaaxeen, että he huijaavat, vain jotta olet tietoinen tästä kilpailusta ja sinulle tulisi pakkomielle siitä, ovatko he heidän kanssaan vai eivät, kun he ovat poissa. Joka tapauksessa he "hiljenevät" kanssasi, samalla kun he patistaaxeen sinua kerskailevat toisesta, kontrollitaktiikkana, joka toivottavasti saa sinut "työskentelemään" saadaksesi takaisin sen, mikä oli poistettu, vaikka se olisi yksinkertaisesti paikka heidän elämässään. He toivovat herättävänsä turvattomuutta ja kateutta sisälläsi, minkä vuoksi se tehdään niin avoimesti. Heidän tavoitteenaan on, että kun he palaavat, sinusta tuntuu kuin olisit "voittanut", toivottaen heidät iloisesti tervetulleeksi avosylin, riippumatta siitä, kuinka he kohtelivat sinua aiemmin, yksinkertaisesti kiitollisena siitä, että he ovat läsnä ollessasi yhä enemmän.
ellauri203.html on line 204: Le mariage de Maximilien et de Marie est célébré dans la chapelle du palais d’Hiver, à Saint-Pétersbourg, le 2 juillet 1839. Il donne lieu à 15 jours de festivités mais soulève la désapprobation des Moscovites, qui sont choqués de voir l’une de leurs princesses s’unir à un prince français, dont le père a participé à la prise de leur ville en 1812. Immédiatement après les épousailles, le duc de Leuchtenberg reçoit du tsar Nicolas Ier le prédicat d'altesse impériale et le titre de prince Romanovsky. Il est nommé major général de l'armée russe et colonel en chef du régiment de hussards de Kiev. Il reçoit par ailleurs une rente annuelle de 100 000 roubles. De son côté, le tsar confère à Marie une rente de 700 000 roubles ainsi qu'une somme de 2 millions payable en bons du trésor à 4%. Afin de loger le couple, l'empereur s'engage finalement à construire et à meubler à ses frais un palais meublé à Saint-Pétersbourg et un autre situé dans les environs de la capitale.
ellauri203.html on line 352: Kirja alkaa keskustelulla Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewiczin dystopisesta romaanista Kyltymättömyys. Romaanissa uusi Mongoli-imperiumi valloittaa Puolan ja esittelee Murti-Bing-pillereitä itsenäisen ajattelun parannuskeinona. Aluksi pillerit luovat tyytyväisyyttä ja sokeaa tottelevaisuutta, mutta lopulta johtavat niitä ottavien kehittämään kaksoispersoonallisuuksia. Miłosz vertaa nokelasti pillereitä marxilais-leninismin älyllisesti tuhoaviin vaikutuksiin Neuvostoliitossa ja neuvostoblokissa.
ellauri203.html on line 424: Älä tapa minua. 2022 | 16+ | 1 t 30 min | Romanttiset elokuvat. Mies (Clasu) ottaa rakkaansa (Ebba) kanssa yliannoksen huumeita ja kuolee, mutta virkoaa yksin ja huomaa joutuneensa väkivaltaiseen maailmaan, jota ei tiennyt olevan olemassakaan. On kuuma ja hiilihankotyypit heiluttelee ruoskia. Pääosissa: Alice Pagani, Rocco Fasano, Silvia Calderoni.
ellauri203.html on line 487: Romaani kuvaa elämää Venäjän keisarikunnassa 1800-luvun lopulla. Vallankumousmielialan noustessa Venäjällä vastakkaiset ideologiat törmäävät toisiinsa. Dostojevski kritisoi sekä vasemmistolaisia heidän demonisista ideoistaan että konservatiiveja heidän kyvyttömyydestään vaientaa muiden ajatuksia ja estää sosiaalisia parannuxia.
ellauri204.html on line 138: Printul fermecat (Romania)
ellauri204.html on line 329: Hieronymus (342-7. – 30. syyskuuta 420), joka lukija tuntee toisellakin nimellä, nim. Geronimon nimellä, oli Stridonista (Romania),
ellauri204.html on line 485: Korhosen kirja valittiin hiljattain ehdolle Finlandia-palkinnon saajaksi. Tämä ei ole yllätys, sillä teos sisältää poikkeuksellisen hyvin kirjoitettuja kohtia. Romaani ei ole aivan kansainvälistä tasoa, mutta erottuu edukseen kotimaisessa kirjallisuudessa. Sen nostaminen joulumyyntiä vauhdittavan tunnustuksen saajaksi olisi pieni ihme sinänsä.
ellauri204.html on line 499: Romaanissa kuvattujen ihmisten historian taju on niin vääristynyttä, ettei se voi olla johtamatta pahaan. Näin on siitä huolimatta, että Eero yrittää parhaansa mukaan selittää hänessä tapahtunutta henkistä muutosta: ”Väkivaltafantasioissa ei piillyt mitään syvää merkitystä. Ne ilmensivät vain darwinistista olioiden mittelyä erotiikan symbolialueelle siirrettynä. Vahvempi sieppasi hiehomman ja todisti geneettisen laatunsa ja rohkeutensa ja panosti antautumaan.” (s. 223)
ellauri204.html on line 816: Eero, vähän epävakaa paintball-yrittäjä, ottaa vaimon päiväunelmoinnin tosissaan. Miehisyys pitää todistaa. Romantiikkakin palaisi. Mukaan Eero pyytää parasta kaveriaan Laria, joka on juuri jätetty aneemisuuden takia. Kuten arvata saattaa, ihailee hintelä mies raakaa voimaa. Naisenryöstö antaisi syyn toimintaan.
ellauri205.html on line 217: Les Romains méprisaient les étrangers, les ennemis, les vaincus, leurs sujets, leurs esclaves; aussi n’ont-ils eu ni épopées ni tragédies. Ils remplaçaient les tragédies par les jeux de gladiateurs. Les Hébreux voyaient dans le malheur le signe du péché et par suite un motif légitime de mépris; ils regardaient leurs ennemis vaincus comme étant en horreur à Dieu même et condamnés à expier des crimes, ce qui rendait la cruauté permise et même indispensable. Aussi, aucun texte de l'Ancien Testament ne rend-il un son comparable à celui de l'épopée grecque, sinon peut-être certaines parties du poème de Job.
ellauri206.html on line 292: Today, I’m going to present you a rather complicated French poem, which speaks of French historical characters and refers to legends from France and the Roman and Greek antiquity.
ellauri210.html on line 212: Roussel oli omana elinaikanaan marginaalinen kirjailija, eivätkä läheskään kaikki kirjallisuudenhistoriat mainitse hänen nimeään. Sen sijaan surrealistit arvostivat häntä. Michel Foucault kirjoitti ensimmäisen kirjansa Rousselista. OuLiPo-ryhmä, Nouveau Roman –kirjailijat ja Tel Quelin jäsenet sen sijaan ovat jatkaneet Rousselin viitoittamalla päättömyyxien tiellä.
ellauri210.html on line 718: Annalisa Chirico è una giovane e brillante giornalista dalla lingua schietta. Dietro la sua bella presenza si cela un personaggio preparatissimo, nel suo campo: la scrittura. La giornalista è sempre stata decisa riguardo il suo futuro e suo padre è stato la figura che l’ha spronata maggiormente. Pugliese originaria di Brindisi, a soli diciotto anni, Annalisa sale un pezzo di stivale fino a Roma per frequentare la Luiss Guido Carli, laureandosi in Scienze Politiche.
ellauri210.html on line 725: Alessio Di Chirico (Roma, 12 dicembre 1989) è un artista marziale misto ed ex giocatore di football americano italiano.
ellauri210.html on line 891: Agence Générale du Suicide, suivi de Lord Patchogue, Je serai sérieux comme le plaisir, Roman d'un jeune homme pauvre, Pensées et aphorismes. Voix d'encre, 2015, Montélimar.
ellauri210.html on line 1046: Romaanin keskeisen osan muodostivat otteet Saarikosken isän Simo Silakan päiväkirjoista Aunuksen retken ajoilta vuonna 1919. Kirjallisuudentutkija Markku Eskelisen mielestä "Saarikoksen romaanissa erilaisten materiaalien törmäykset ovat vaimeita ja jännitteettömiä", eikä Eskelinen löydä siitä parhaita kollaasiromaaneja hallitsevaa vaikeutta käsittää teosta yhtenäiseksi kokonaisuudeksi. Eskelinen pitää tätä teosta ja kolmea muuta Saarikosken proosateosta Suomen ensimmäisinä julkkiskirjailijakirjoina, joissa idoli kertoo faneilleen kuulumisistaan
ellauri210.html on line 1306: Mansour, lejos de generar o de seguir con la imagen de la mujer creada por André Bretón incluye la belleza fatal, entendida como una belleza herida, lejos del principio de Narciso. Junto con Gisèle Prassinos y Lise Deharme proceden a crear una renovación estética en la literatura surrealista. Adjetivos como “laid(e)”, “malade”, “malformé(e)” serán típicos de estas autoras que elaboran un reflejo femenino escribiendo sobre “antiNadjas” als gegen Bretons Roman verfasste Anti Nadja.
ellauri214.html on line 242: In his work Bibliotheca historica (Library of History), Diodorus Siculus wrote that the Amazons came from Libya in north Africa. Diodorus’s account is set in the time of myth. He wrote that the warriors’ most famous queen was Myrina, who lived before the hero Perseus saved the Ethiopian princess Andromeda from a sea monster. Myrina led her warriors to a great number of victories, including one against the mythical island of Atlantis. Myrina led a large army of 30,000 foot-soldiers and 3,000 cavalry against the Atlanteans. Diodorus claimed that the Amazon cavalry used tactics similar to those employed by the Parthians of west Asia, who fought the Roman general Crassus (c. 115— 53 BCE), firing arrows as they rode away from their enemies. The Atlanteans eventually surrendered to Myrina after she had captured and destroyed one of their cities, enslaving and carrying away the women and the children.
ellauri214.html on line 584: Olga Tokarczuk näyttää jyrsijältä. Hiän on kasvissyöjä. Roman Fingas, psykologitoveri, oli Tokarczukin ensimmäinen aviomies. He menivät naimisiin, kun hän oli 23-vuotias ja myöhemmin eronnut; heidän poikansa Zbigniew syntyi vuonna 1986. Grzegorz Zygadło on hänen toinen aviomiehensä.
ellauri214.html on line 588: Olga Tokarczuk on yksi Puolan suosituimmista ihmisistä. Luultavasti kukaan ei ole kuullut siitä, että kirjailija voitti Nobelin kirjallisuuspalkinnon. Vimma pyyhkäisi paitsi koko Puolan myös maailman. Toistaiseksi erittäin vaatimaton Olga Tokarczuk on tullut fanien ja toimittajien kysynnäksi. Vaikka hän antaa itse paljon haastatteluja, hän puhuu harvoin yksityiselämästään. Tiedetään, että hän on Grzegorz Zygadłan onnellinen vaimo, kuusi vuotta nuorempi kuin hän, koulutukseltaan filologi. Olga Tokarczukilla on myös poika Zbigniew, joka on hänen ensimmäisen avioliitonsa hedelmä kustantaja Roman Fingasin kanssa. Olgan kirjassa ovat naiset hyvixiä ja/tai fixuja, miehet pahixia ja/tai tyhmiä. Nii oikke, maxellaan vähän kalavelkoja. Näytetään niille pillua muttei anneta. Koko kirja on aikuisten satua. Eikä edes niin kovinkaan aikusten.
ellauri216.html on line 334: Matkaa Kostromaan on meiltä 30 virzaa. Mummon suolakurkut käyvät, ne on kitkeriä ja puoliveteitä. Puolalaiset oli sekasorron aikana pahixia ryssissä, kunnes Romanovit hoitelivat ne. Puolalaiset valtasivat Kremlinkin ja esiintyivät siellä isäntinä. Romanovit piileskeli puolalaisia juurikin Kostromassa. Vuoroin vieraissa käydään, eix je Olga Tokarczuk?
ellauri216.html on line 352: Maaliskuun 14. päivänä, vanhan tyylin mukaan, 1613, Kostroman Pyhän Kolminaisuuden Ipatievin luostarissa Mihail Feodorovich Romanov, ihmeellisen Feodorovskaja-ikonin edessä, hyväksyi Zemskin katedraalin valinnan Venäjän valtion valtaistuimelle. Kroniikan todisteiden mukaan katedraalin sanansaattajat, jotka edustivat kaikkia Venäjän maan kiinteistöjä, pyysivät useiden tuntien ajan Mihail Feodorovichia ja hänen äitiään, suuri nunna Marfa Ioannovnaa, hyväksymään neuvoston päätöksen; suostumus saatiin vasta suurlähetystön päällikön, Ryazanin arkkipiispan ja Murom Theodoretin vetoomuksen jälkeen, joka kehotti nuorta Mihailia ja hänen vanhempiaan kumartamaan Jumalan tahdon edessä. Mihail Feodorovich Romanov vannoi uskollisuutta Isänmaalle, ortodoksiselle kirkolle ja Venäjän kansalle Ihmeellisellä Feodorovski-kuvakkeella. Tästä tapahtumasta, joka oli suurten vaikeuksien voittamisen alku, Kostroman kaupungissa sijaitsevasta Feodorovskin Jumalanäidin ikonista ja Pyhän Kolminaisuuden Ipatievin luostarista tuli erityisen arvostettuja Romanovien kuninkaallisen talon pyhäkköjä. muisto Mihail Feodorovichin kutsumisesta valtakuntaan, toinen ikonin juhla perustettiin - 27. maaliskuuta, uusi tyyli.
ellauri216.html on line 354: 1700-luvun toisesta puoliskosta lähtien monet kuninkaallisen perheen jäsenet, mukaan lukien kaikki Venäjän keisarit, Nikolai I:stä alkaen, pitivät velvollisuutensa vierailla Kostromassa - "Romanovien kehdossa" - ja kumartaa ihmeellisen Feodorovskajan ikonin edessä. kaikkein pyhin Theotokos. Vuonna 1913, Romanovien dynastian 300-vuotisjuhlan kansallisjuhlan aikana, Kostromassa vierailivat
ellauri216.html on line 355: pyhät kuninkaalliset marttyyrit - viimeinen Venäjän keisari Nikolai Aleksandrovitš ja hänen kunniakas perheensä. Romanovien dynastian ihmeellisen Jumalanäidin kuvan erityinen kunnioitus sai ilmauksensa Tsarskoje Seloon rakennetussa Feodorovskin kaupungissa, jossa oli temppeli ihmeellisen Jumalanäidin Feodorovskajan ikonin nimissä, sekä se tosiasia, että heterodoksisuudesta ortodoksiseen uskoon kääntyneiden kuninkaallisen perheen jäsenten morsiamet ottivat keskimmäisen nimen "Feodorovna".
ellauri216.html on line 384: Feodorovskajan Jumalanäidin ikonin kunnioittamisen toinen aalto alkoi 1600-luvulla. Sisälliskiista päättyi, kuningas valittiin. Mihail Romanovia siunattiin tällä kuvakkeella. Tänä päivänä perustettiin kuvan kunniaksi myös kirkkojuhla. Siitä lähtien hänellä on erityinen yhteys kuninkaalliseen perheeseen. Ensimmäiset listat Kostromasta tulivat Moskovaan nunna Marthan (kuninkaan äidin) ansiosta. Jo 1600-luvun lopulla. ikonin ansiosta tapahtuneista ihmeistä kirjoitettiin legenda.
ellauri216.html on line 437: Jumalanäidin "Fedorovskaya"-kuvaketta kunnioitetaan erityisesti Venäjällä, myös siksi, että juuri tämän kuvan kautta annettiin Jumalan siunaus Mihail Fedorovich Romanovin hallitukselle, jonka valinta Venäjän valtaistuimelle tapahtui vuonna 1613. lopetti Venäjän valtiota pitkään piinaneen valtion kuohunta. Moskovasta Kostromaan lähetettiin Zemsky Soborin suurlähetystö, joka toi mukanaan Jumalanäidin "Vladimirskajan" ja Moskovan ihmetyöntekijöiden ikonin. Kostromassa papisto tapasi heidät "Fedorov"-kuvakkeen kanssa, ja he kaikki menivät Ipatievin luostariin, jossa nuori Mihail oli äitinsä, nunna Matryonan kanssa.
ellauri216.html on line 441: Moskovaan lähtiessään Mihail Fedorovich otti mukaansa luettelon ihmeellisestä kuvakkeesta ja asetti sen Neitsyt syntymän hovikirkkoon "Senyalle". Siitä lähtien kaikki Romanovien kuninkaallisen talon edustajat kunnioittivat erityisesti "Fedorov" -kuvaa Jumalan äidistä.
ellauri216.html on line 447: 1900-luvun alun kauheat tapahtumat eivät ohittaneet Kostromaa. Jumalan Providence säilytti kuitenkin Venäjän maan suuren pyhäkön. Ikoni ei vain välttynyt teomakistien häpäisyltä, vaan myös pysyi kirkoissa koko 1900-luvun. On huomattava, että ottaen huomioon ihmeellisen "Fedorovskaya"-kuvakkeen henkisen ja kulttuurisen arvon ja sen historiallisen yhteyden Romanovien kuninkaalliseen taloon, tämä tapaus on ainutlaatuinen kirkon lähihistoriassa.
ellauri216.html on line 1115: Neuvostoliiton joukkojen läsnäolon aiheuttamia vahinkoja luostarille käyttivät fasistiset propagandistit. Luostarissa vieraili usein saksalaisia, jotka ottivat siitä kuvia, sekä muiden fasistisen blokin maiden - Bulgarian, Romanian, Slovakian, Unkarin ja Kroatian - edustajia. Näistä vierailijoista hyötyivät luostarin veljet – heidän kauttaan munkit lähettivät Valaamilaisille kirjeitä ja valokuvia muihin maihin. Elokuussa 1942 Valaamissa vieraili italialainen kirjeenvaihtaja ja valokuvaaja Lino Pellegrini, joka jätti yksityiskohtaisen raportin fasistisen puolueen "Il popolo d'Italia" virallisissa painetuissa elimissä (noin kuukautta myöhemmin valkoinen emigrantti painoi sen uudelleen." Paris Bulletin").
ellauri217.html on line 34:

POPEYE THE SAILOR MAN!

Romantiikkaa

ellauri217.html on line 39: Romantiikka on geenien ja meemien konfliktia. Se ilmenee selkeästi Kippari Kallen Oskarin näköisen egyptiläisen nobelistin abrahamistiuskontoja pilkkaavasta allegorisesta kirjasta. Kopulaatio ei ole romanttista ellei siihen ei liity sellaista konfliktia. Voi se olla muuten mukavaa muttei yhtä jännää.
ellauri217.html on line 310: Als der schwer zuckerkranke Konsalik im Alter von 78 Jahren in seinem Salzburger Haus an einem Schlaganfall verstarb, hatte er mit seinem Lebenswerk von 155 Romanen, die in 43 Schaffensjahren entstanden und von „Kriegsalltag, Gewalt, Sex und anderen Trivialitäten“ handeln, eine Weltauflage von 83 Millionen erreicht.
ellauri217.html on line 706: The Council of Jerusalem is generally dated to 48 AD, roughly 15 to 25 years after the crucifixion of Jesus (between 26 and 36 AD). Acts 15 and Galatians 2 both suggest that the meeting was called to debate whether or not male Gentiles who were converting to become followers of Jesus were required to become circumcised; the rite of circumcision was considered execrable and repulsive during the period of Hellenization of the Eastern Mediterranean, and was especially adversed in Classical civilization both from ancient Greeks and Romans, which instead valued the foreskin positively.
ellauri217.html on line 738: According to the 19th-century Roman Catholic Bishop Karl Josef von Hefele, the Apostolic Decree of the Jerusalem Council "has been obsolete for centuries in the West", though it is still recognized and observed by the Eastern Orthodox Church. Hypersensationalists, such as the 20th century Anglican E. W. Bullinger, would be another example of a group that believes the decree (and everything before Acts 28) no longer applies.
ellauri219.html on line 585: To a large degree, "Pelagianism" was defined by its opponent Augustine, and exact definitions remain elusive. Although Pelagianism had considerable support in the contemporary Christian world, especially among the Roman elite and monks, it was attacked by Augustine and his supporters, who had opposing views on grace, predestination and free will. Augustine proved victorious in the Pelagian controversy; Pelagianism was decisively condemned at the 418 Council of Carthage and is still regarded as heretical by the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church.

Burn in hell Pelagius, go jump in the fiery lake! Vitun humanisti!
ellauri219.html on line 843: Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman statesman, orator, and philosopher (106-43 BCE).
ellauri219.html on line 845: Lucretius, Roman philosopher and poet (96?-55 BCE).
ellauri220.html on line 341:

(US ) A black person. Notable for appearing in the 1979 film, The Jerk[ and the 1993 film True Romance.


ellauri220.html on line 509: