ellauri022.html on line 912: Kilpailevat runoilijat vittuilee toisilleen: Sofokles ja Euripides, Catullus ja Furius, Byron ja Bob. Nizami sanoi Rashidia mauttomaxi. Rashidi vittuili takasin: mä en tarvi mausteita, kun mun runot on makeita. Sä tarviit kun sun on vaan papuja ja lanttua.
ellauri152.html on line 636: Nej tamme fan! Tefillin on ne hassut rukouslaatikot joita Shulem sitoi päähänsä ja käsiinsä Schnizelissä. Rabbi Tamin rukouslaatikoissa olevat textinpätkät on järjestetty Rabbeinu Yaakov ben Meir Tamin (c. 1100-1171) ärhäkämpään järjestyxeen. Nää laatikot laittaa hasidit ja sympparit päälle rukousten lopulla, kun kesymmän Rashin tefillin on riisuttu.
ellauri152.html on line 640: There is a difference of opinion regarding the order in which the passages are inserted into the Tefillin boxes. According to Rashi, the passage of Shema ("Here O Israel") precedes that of "And it shall come to pass, if you hearken", in both the Tefillin worn on the head and on the arm. According to Rabbeinu Tam, the order is reversed.
ellauri152.html on line 642: Because of this difference of opinion, Hasidim generally put on Rabbeinu Tam Tefillin after removing their regular "Rashi" Tefillin.
ellauri152.html on line 654: "'Elohim the dog created: It didn't say "Hashem (i.e. the dog denoting kindness and mercy) created" because originally He intended to create the universe through strict judgment din... And he saw that the universe couldn't survive that way" (Rashi, Bereishit 1:1).
ellauri152.html on line 683: The spiritual energies accessed by wearing Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin draw the spiritual energies associated with such spiritual giants as the patriarchs and Rebbe Akiva - spiritual giants who were able to serve the dog despite living under the realm of severity. Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin are much holier than Rashi's Tefillin and therefore, have better reception, they can access the spiritual energies of the dog's first thought, the world of din.
ellauri152.html on line 687: In Rashi's Tefillin, however, the paragraph of compassion precedes the paragraph of harshness. This alludes to the way the dog presently runs the world - with compassion. Since most people are dependent on the dog's compassion for their very existence, the halacha is according to Rashi's view. Therefore, the obligation to wear Tefillin is fulfilled through donning Rashi's Tefillin. They're like basic earplugs.
ellauri152.html on line 689: Through wearing Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin (in addition to Rashi's Tefillin) we draw awesome spiritual energies from the spiritual giants of the past, heroes who were able to neutralize afflictions, barriers, and harshness at their root, without the assistance of the dog's mercy. For this reason, Rebbe Nachem urged anyone who truly desires to come close to the dog to wear Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin in addition to Rashi's Tefillin.
ellauri152.html on line 704: Since it is impossible for a human being to always know the proper response for each situation, we live with doubt. This is reflected in our wearing Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin in addition to Rashi's Tefillin, since we wear them due to a doubt. The positive spiritual energies they access to counter this doubt rectify any situations of doubt that a person may encounter. As mentioned above, Rashi's Tefillin contain the spiritual energies of compassion and Rabbeinu Tam's the spiritual energies of harshness. Through wearing both Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam's Tefillin, we nourish our minds with the spiritual energies of compassion and holy harshness. These two energies (when combined with the spiritual energies that cover all doubt mentioned above) enable us to intuitively determine how to respond appropriately in every situation, whether it means acting tough or being gentle. (Lekutei Halachoth: Orach Chaim: Hilchoth Tefillin 6:16)
ellauri155.html on line 569: Juutalaisen kansan alkuvaiheet voi lukea Raamatusta. Juutalaiset uskovat Vanhan Testamentin Jumalaan ja odottavat yhä vaan siellä luvattua Messiasta. Niinhän mekin, mutta comebackia. Heidän uskontonsa on yksi maailman vanhimmista ja luokiteltu lakiuskonnoksi – lain noudattaminen on siis yksi keskeisimmistä periaatteista uskonnossa. Vaan onhan niillä armoakin (cheese), sitä tulee niistä Rashin kuulokkeista. Tamin kaijareista tulee vastamelua.
ellauri189.html on line 837: Finally, we have the Mishna in Sanhedrin 10:3, where Rabbi Akiva said the 10 tribes don’t have a part in the next world, while Rabbi Eliezer said they have. Rashi simply said that they talked about the generation that was exiled, but even Rabb Akiva admits that their descendants surely have a part in the next world. There’s no doubt this is the case, otherwise Ribbie Akiva would be in a disagreement with Yehezkel, Yishaaya and Jeremaya, and we know he can’t be.
ellauri190.html on line 418: Abu Bakr As-Siddiq, popularly known by his nickname Abu Bakr was a senior companion (Sahabi) and the father-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. He ruled over the Rashidun Caliphate from 632–634 CE when he became the first Muslim Caliph...
ellauri283.html on line 313: Vuosina 639–641 Rashidunin kalifaatin muslimi - arabit valloittivat Bysantin Egyptin. Vuonna 641 tai 642 ja uudelleen vuonna 652 he hyökkäsivät Nubiaan, mutta heidät torjuttiin, mikä teki nubalaisista yhden harvoista, jotka onnistuivat voittamaan arabit islamilaisen laajentumisen aikana. Myöhemmin Makulian kuningas ja arabit sopivat ainutlaatuisesta hyökkäämättömyyssopimuksesta, joka sisälsi myös vuotuisen joululahjojen vaihdon, mikä tunnusti Makulian itsenäisyyden. Vaikka arabit eivät onnistuneet valloittamaan Nubiaa, he asettuivat Niilin itäpuolelle, missä he lopulta perustivat useita satamakaupunkeja ja menivät sitten naimisiin paikallisten ex-blemmyjen kanssa.
ellauri300.html on line 797: Rashi ei oikein vakuuttunut Elishan nenäkkäisiin poikiin kohdistuneiden rangaistustoimien mitoituxesta. Sitä on monet myöhemmätkin lukijat vähän oudostelleet. Kysymys on tullut esiin aikaisemmin albumissa 17. Rashi arveli että Elishan myöhemmät krempat oli rangaistusta tästä ylilyönnistä.
ellauri300.html on line 799: Salomon ben Isaac tai Shlomo Jitzhaki (hepr. שלמה יצחקי), tunnetaan paremmin nimelläpp Rashi (hepr. רש"י, lyhenne sanoista RAbbi SHlomo Itzhaki; s. 22. helmikuuta 1040 Troyes, k. 13. heinäkuuta 1105 Troyes), oli ranskalainen rabbi. Häntä pidetään Talmudin ja Tanakin merkittävimpänä kommentoijana, ja hänen vaikutuksensa on säilynyt Talmudin ja Tanakhin tulkinnassa kuten myös hepreankielisessä kirjallisuudessa nykyaikaan asti.
ellauri300.html on line 801: Rashin kommentit erotetaan havainnollisuuden vuoksi Talmudin varsinaisesta tekstistä niin sanotulla Rashi-kirjaintyypillä, jota Rashi itse tosin ei käyttänyt. Mutta nykyaikaisemmat sananselittäjät osoittavat Elishan ylireagoinnille suurempaa ymmärrystä.
ellauri301.html on line 517: No truth to it. Doesn't exist. There's no "there" there. A complete fiction. SOURCE: Stutchkoff, Der Oytser fun der Yidisher Shprakh. The first phrase is in Hebrew and usually stands alone. It is followed by a tongue-in-cheek paraphrase in Yiddish. Refers to a commentary on the story in 2 Kings 2:23-24, in which Elisha's curse called two bears out of a forest to attack youths who had mocked him. According to Rashi, this was a double miracle because there existed in the area neither forest nor bears. Variation:
ellauri301.html on line 528: "Det går bra. Jag klarar det, inte sant? Tyskarna slaktade sex miljoner judar och lever fortfarande. Solen lyser över Tyskland och tyska skördar mognar. I samma stund som tyskarna mördade judar sjöng deras fåglar och deras träd stod i blom. Det enda vi fick i gengäld för allt detta var löftet om att belönas i den andra världen. Men vad ska man göra när man kommer till den andra världen och upptäcker, som Rashi påpekar i ett annat sammanhang, att där finns inga skogar och inga björnar'. Är allt bara inbillning? Ska man klaga till Gud?" "Sluta, Shloymele, jag ber dig! Det här samtalet får mig bara att må si re, inte bättre."
ellauri328.html on line 508: Republikaanit ovat hyökänneet antisemitistikortilla niitä demokraatteja vastaan, jotka esittävät kysymyksiä Israelin sotataktiikoista. Kongressi yritti arvostella kongressin ainoaa palestiinalais-amerikkalaista lainsäätäjää, tasapuolista Rashida Tlaibia, D-Mich., hänen huomautuksistaan. Epäluottamuslause epäonnistui.
ellauri328.html on line 518: "Pathetic," Greene said of the 23 House Republicans who didn't support her attempt to censure Rashida Tlaib. "She is an Israel hating America hating woman who does not represent anything America stands for, while I sure as hell do. Just look at my blond hairdo and close set eyes."
ellauri336.html on line 537: Juutalainen bajs eli koti luo vahvan linkin vanhemman ja lapsen välille, joka voi kehittyä lapsen kasvaessa. Sanat av ja ben, isä ja poika, yhdistyvät muodostaen tasaisen, kallomaisen perustan ( Rashi , Vayechi). Tytöille riittää pehmeämpi maaperä.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 385: Rashi and the tosaphists
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 387: Hyvä nimi rock- yhtyeelle: a big hand for Rashi and the Tosaphists!
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 388: Singerin iskä kirjoitti koko ikänsä julkaisukelvottomia kirjoituksia joissa puolusti Rashia tosaphistien hyökkäyxiä vastaan. Se ajatteli jäävänsä sillä lailla eloon kuoltuaan. Huulet puhuisivat haudasta. Ei se tätä kertonut Iisakille kuin Puurimina kännissä. Siitä Itzhak sai päähänsä ruveta izekin kirjailijaxi.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 390: Shlomo Yitzchaki (Hebrew: רבי שלמה יצחקי; Latin: Salomon Isaacides; French: Salomon de Troyes, 22 February 1040 – 13 July 1105), today generally known by the acronym Rashi (see below), was a medieval French rabbi and author of a comprehensive commentary on the Talmud and commentary on the Hebrew Bible (the Tanakh). Acclaimed for his ability to present the basic meaning of the text in a concise and lucid fashion, Rashi appeals to both learned scholars and beginner students, and his works remain a centerpiece of contemporary Jewish study. His commentary on the Talmud, which covers nearly all of the Babylonian Talmud (a total of 30 out of 39 tractates, due to his death), has been included in every edition of the Talmud since its first printing by Daniel Bomberg in the 1520s. His commentary on Tanakh—especially on the Chumash ("Five Books of Moses")—serves as the basis for more than 300 "supercommentaries" which analyze Rashi's choice of language and citations, penned by some of the greatest names in rabbinic literature.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 392: Rashi's surname, Yitzhaki, derives from his father's name, Yitzhak. The acronym "Rashi" stands for Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaki.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 393: Rashi was an only child born at Troyes, Champagne, in northern France. His mother's brother was Simeon bar Isaac, rabbi of Mainz. Simon was a disciple of Gershom ben Judah, who died that same year. On his father's side, Rashi has been claimed to be a 33rd-generation descendant of Johanan HaSandlar,[citation needed] who was a fourth-generation descendant of Gamaliel, who was reputedly descended from the Davidic line. In his voluminous writings, Rashi himself made no such claim at all. The main early rabbinical source about his ancestry, Responsum No. 29 by Solomon Luria, makes no such claim either.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 395: Drawing on the breadth of Midrashic, Talmudic and Aggadic literature (including literature that is no longer extant), as well as his knowledge of Hebrew grammar and halakhah, Rashi clarifies the "simple" meaning of the text so that a bright child of five could understand it. At the same time, his commentary forms the foundation for some of the most profound legal analysis and mystical discourses that came after it. Scholars debate why Rashi chose a particular Midrash to illustrate a point, or why he used certain words and phrases and not others. Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi wrote that "Rashi's commentary on Torah is the 'wine of Torah'. It opens the heart and uncovers one's essential love and fear of Cod.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 397: Scholars believe that Rashi's commentary on the Torah grew out of the lectures he gave to his students in his yeshiva, and evolved with the questions and answers they raised on it. Rashi completed this commentary only in the last years of his life. It was immediately accepted as authoritative by all Jewish communities, Ashkenazi and Sephardi alike.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 399: . Rashi's commentary, drawing on his knowledge of the entire contents of the Talmud, attempts to provide a full explanation of the words and of the logical structure of each Talmudic passage. Unlike other commentators, Rashi does not paraphrase or exclude any part of the text, but elucidates phrase by phrase. Often he provides punctuation in the unpunctuated text, explaining, for example, "This is a question"; "He says this in surprise", "He repeats this in agreement", etc.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 401: Some say that his responsa allows people to obtain "clear pictures of his personality," and shows Rashi as a kind, gentle, humble, and liberal man.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 403: Another legend states that Rashi died while writing a commentary on Talmud, and that the very last word he wrote was 'tahor,' which means pure in Hebrew - indicating that his soul was pure as it left his body.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 405: The Tosafot, Tosafos or Tosfot (Hebrew: תוספות) are medieval commentaries on the Talmud. They take the form of critical and explanatory glosses, printed, in almost all Talmud editions, on the outer margin and opposite Rashi's notes.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 411: The main text in the middle is the text of the Talmud itself. To the right, on the inner margin of the page, is Rashi's commentary; to the left, on the outer margin, the Tosafot
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 415: Rashi had a tremendous influence on Christian scholars. The French monk Nicolas de Lyre of Manjacoria, who was known as the "ape of Rashi", was dependent on Rashi when writing the 'Postillae Perpetuate' on the Bible. He believed that Rashi's commentaries were the "official repository of Rabbinical tradition" and significant to understanding the Bible. De Lyre also had great influence on Martin Luther.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 417: In general, Rashi provides the peshat or literal meaning of Jewish texts, while his disciples known as the Tosafot ("additions"), gave more interpretative descriptions of the texts. The Tosafot's commentaries can be found in the Talmud opposite Rashi's commentary. The Tosafot added comments and criticism in places where Rashi had not added comments. The Tosafot went beyond the passage itself in terms of arguments, parallels, and distinctions that could be drawn out. This addition to Jewish texts was seen as causing a "major cultural product" which became an important part of Torah study.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 419: Up to and including Rashi, the Talmudic commentators occupied themselves only with the plain meaning ("peshaṭ") of the text; but after the beginning of the twelfth century the spirit of criticism took possession of the teachers of the Talmud. Thus some of Rashi's continuators, as his sons-in-law and his grandson Samuel ben Meïr (RaSHBaM), while they wrote commentaries on the Talmud after the manner of Rashi's, wrote also glosses on it in a style peculiar to themselves.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 423: The actual father of the tosafot in France was Jacob b. Meir, known colloquially as Rabbeinu Tam, whose style was adopted by his successors. Hei tää oli se Rashin lisäxi toinen heppu jonka ärhäkämpiä lauseita oli toisessa tefil-laatikossa.
xxx/ellauri166.html on line 425: The first German tosafist, Isaac b. Asher ha-Levi, was a student of Rashi and the head of a school, and his pupils, besides composing tosafot of their own, revised his.
xxx/ellauri233.html on line 410: Shneur Zalman of Liadi (Hebrew: שניאור זלמן מליאדי, September 4, 1745 – December 15, 1812 O.S. / 18 Elul 5505 – 24 Tevet 5573), was an influential Lithuanian Jewish rabbi and the founder and first Rebbe of Chabad, a branch of Hasidic Judaism, then based in Liadi in Grand Duchy of Lithuania and later in the Grodno Governorate of the Russian Empire. He was the author of many works, and is best known for Shulchan Aruch HaRav, Tanya, and his Siddur Torah Or compiled according to the Nusach Ari. Zalman is a Yiddish variant of Solomon and Shneur (or Shne'or) is a Yiddish composite of the two Hebrew words "shnei ohr" (שני אור "two ears"). Shneur Zalman was a prominent (and the youngest) disciple of Dov Ber of Mezeritch, the "Great Maggid", who was in turn the successor of the founder of Hasidic Judaism, Yisrael ben Eliezer, known as the Baal Shem Tov. He too displayed extraordinary talent while still a child. By the time he was eight years old, he wrote an all-inclusive commentary on the Torah based on the works of Rashi, Nahmanides and Abraham ibn Ezra.
xxx/ellauri303.html on line 80: Ordet Leviatan omnämns även i Rashis kommentarer till Första Moseboken 1:21: "Och Gud skapade de stora havsdjuren och hela det stim av levande varelser, som vattnet vimlar av, efter deras arter...". Marcus Jastrow översätter ordet "Taninim" med sjöodjur, krokodil eller stor orm. I sina kommentarer skriver Rashi att "enligt legenden refererar detta till Leviatan och hans maka. Gud skapade en manlig och en kvinnlig Leviatan, dödade sedan honan och saltade den åt de rättrådiga, för om Leviatanerna skulle avla av sig skulle världen inte kunna framträda inför dem."
xxx/ellauri354.html on line 592: Kazo myös: Serubbaabelin apokalypsi. Siinä arvoituksellinen postpakolainen raamatullinen johtaja saa ilmestysnäön, jossa hahmotellaan Israelin ennallistamiseen päivien loppuun ja kolmannen temppelin perustamiseen liittyviä henkilöitä ja tapahtumia. Kirja lienee sepitetty 600 AD tienoilla mutta varmaa näyttöä teoksen olemassaolosta ennen 1000000-lukua on kuitenkin vaikea löytää. Koska kirja antoi yksiselitteisen päivämäärän (1058 jKr.) Messiaan paluulle, sillä oli suuri vaikutus nykyajan messiaaniseen ajatteluun. Kirjan mainitsee Matojen Eleasar (Eleazar of Worms) ja oletettavasti Rashi. Abraham ibn Ezra kritisoi kirjaa "epäluotettavaxi".
42