ellauri014.html on line 83: Locke addressed the concept of supply and demand as part of a discussion about interest rates in 17th-century England. The phrase "supply and demand" was first used by James Denham-Steuart in his Inquiry into the Principles of Political Economy, published in 1767. Adam Smith used the phrase in his 1776 book The Wealth of Nations.
ellauri053.html on line 697: Herbert Spencer (27 April 1820 – 8 December 1903) was an English philosopher, biologist, anthropologist, and sociologist famous for his hypothesis of social Darwinism whereby superior physical force shapes history. Spencer originated the expression "survival of the fittest", which he coined in Principles of Biology (1864) after reading Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species. The term strongly suggests natural selection, yet Spencer saw evolution as extending into realms of sociology and ethics, so he also supported Lamarckism.
ellauri053.html on line 704: Spencer is best known as the originator of the expression "survival of the fittest", which he coined in Principles of Biology (1864) after reading Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species. The term strongly suggests natural selection, yet Spencer saw evolution as extending into realms of sociology and ethics, so he also supported Lamarckism.
ellauri082.html on line 389: Jamesia pidetään nykyaikaisen uskontopsykologian perustajana. James kirjoitti muun muassa amerikkalaisen psykologian perusteoksena pidetyn The Principles of Psychology, joka ilmestyi vuonna 1890. Teoksillaan The Will to Believe (1897), The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902, suom. Uskonnollinen kokemus), Pragmatism (1907, suom. Pragmatismi) ja The Meaning of Truth (1909) James loi maineen yhtenä aikansa merkittävimmistä uskontofilosofeista. William Jamesin vuonna 1896 pitämän esitelmän ”The Will to Believe” mukaan uskonnollinen usko on äärettömän riskin ottamista. Se on kuin vuorikiipeilijän hengenvaarallinen loikka, joka ei voi toteutua ilman vankkaa uskoa hypyn onnistumiseen.
ellauri119.html on line 334: Maimonides´ 13 Principles of faith, Second Principle:
ellauri131.html on line 289: Jack Canafield (born August 19, 1944) is an American author, motivational speaker (!), corporate trainer, and entrepreneur. He is the co-author of the Chicken Coop for the Soul series, which has more than 250 titles and 500 million copies in print in over 40 languages. In 2005 Canafield co-authored The Success Principles: How to Get From Where You Are to Where You Were.
ellauri142.html on line 609: Spencer's reputation among the Victorians owed a great deal to his agnosticism. He rejected theology as representing the 'impiety of the pious.' He was to gain much notoriety from his repudiation of traditional religion, and was frequently condemned by religious thinkers for allegedly advocating atheism and materialism. Nonetheless, unlike Thomas Henry Huxley, whose agnosticism was a militant creed directed at 'the unpardonable sin of faith' (in Adrian Desmond's phrase), Spencer insisted that he was not concerned to undermine religion in the name of science, but to bring about a reconciliation of the two. The following argument is a summary of Part 1 of his First Principles (2nd ed 1867).
ellauri151.html on line 531: The problem has four key presuppositions: the fact/meaning, fact/value and appearance/reality conceptual gaps and the Principle of Sufficient Reason.
ellauri153.html on line 349:
  • If the situation is (question Job, disaster, question God, Answer), Job moves. He can either play (Recognize God without PSR Principle of Sufficient Reason, kz. Schopenhauerin väitöskirja plus infra, or (⌐Recognize God without PSR), i.e. recognize that God can reach His goals of repairing suffering and the claim that God must be rejected for evil without reasons is false. If Job plays (⌐Recognize God without PSR), Job and God lose. If Job plays (recognize God), the evil (challenge) is taken out of play.
    ellauri153.html on line 854: Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde is an elaboration on the classical Principle of Sufficient Reason, written by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer as his Jena doctoral dissertation in 1813. The principle of sufficient reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason or cause.
    xxx/ellauri084.html on line 365: Bohr is the father of the Complementarity Principle, a tenet in quantum physics stating that a complete knowledge of phenomena on atomic scale requires a description of both wave and particle properties. When Bohr was knighted for his work, he used the yin-yang symbol in his coat of arms and inscribed it with the words Contraria sunt complementa (opposites are complementary).
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 89: On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (German: Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde) is an elaboration on the classical Principle of Sufficient Reason, written by German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer as his doctoral dissertation in 1813. The principle of sufficient reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason or cause. Schopenhauer revised and re-published it in 1847. The work articulated the centerpiece of many of Schopenhauer's arguments, and throughout his later works he consistently refers his readers to it as the necessary beginning point for a full understanding of his further writings.)
    xxx/ellauri113.html on line 93: The Principle of Reason, the text of an important and influential lecture course that Martin Heidegger gave in 1955-56, takes as its focal point Leibniz's principle: nothing is without reason. Heidegger shows here that the principle of reason is in fact a principle of being. Much of his discussion is aimed at bringing his readers to the "leap of thinking," which enables them to grasp the principle of reason as a principle of being. This text presents Heidegger's most extensive reflection on the notion of history and its essence, the Geschick of being, which is considered on of the most important developments in Heidegger's later thought. One of Heidegger's most artfully composed texts, it also contains important discussions of language, translation, reason, objectivity, and technology as well as remarkable readings of Leibniz, Kant, Aristotle, and Goethe, among others. And lots of black-and-white pictures of scantily dressed women.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 563: The difference between a rule and a principle is that one is merely a guideline that follows from the other. Principles don’t break. They’re universal. Gravity is a principle. Whether it’s you who falls from a skyscraper, your cat, or a 17th century vase, it’s not gonna end well. Gravity makes no exceptions.
    xxx/ellauri123.html on line 664:
    The True Purpose of Rules & Principles

    xxx/ellauri167.html on line 478: It also occurred to me that you might have had Ideas to that Purport when you disapproved of the Meetings of the Democratic-Societies, which appeared to me to be a Branch of that Order, though many Members may be entirely ignorant of the Plan. Those Men who are so much attached to French Principles, have all the Marks of Jacobinism. They first cast off all religious Restraints, and then became fit for perpetrating every Act of Inhumanity. And, it is remarkable, that most of them are actually Scoffers at all religious Principles. It is said that the ‘Lodge Theodore in Bavaria became notorious for the many bold and dangerous Sentiments in Religion and Politics that were uttered in their Harangues, and its Members were remarkable for their Zeal in making Proselytes’; (and no Wonder since the Order was to rule the World.) Is not there a striking Similarity between their Proceedings and those of many Societies that oppose the Measures of our present Government?
    xxx/ellauri303.html on line 367: Monet piyyutit ovat tuttuja synagogan jumalanpalvelusten säännöllisille kävijöille. Esimerkiksi tunnetuin piyyut voi olla Adon Olam (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adon_Olam) ("Maailman mestari"). Sen runollinen muoto koostuu toistuvasta rytmisestä kuviosta lyhyt-pitkä-pitkä-pitkä (tai hidas-hidas nopea-nopea) (ns. hazaj-mittari (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazaj_meter) eli foxtrot/tango), ja se on niin rakas, että sitä lauletaan usein monien synagogajumalanpalvelusten päätteeksi, rituaalisen Sheeba iltaresitoinnin jälkeen, (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shema) ja aamurituaalin tefilliiniprofylakterioiden pukemisen (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tefillin) aikana. Toinen rakastettu piyyut on Yigdal (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yigdal) ("Olkoon Jumala pyhitetty"), joka perustuu Maimonidesin kolmentoista uskon periaatteeseen. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteen_Principles_of_Faith).
    xxx/ellauri357.html on line 352: Ja näiden ihannemuotojen avulla, joiden avulla sielu käyttää sinkkua herraus elävien yli, meillä on diskursiivista päättelyä, aistitietoa ja älykkyys. Tästä hetkestä lähtien meillä on erikoisesti Me: ennen tätä siellä oli vain "meidän"; mutta tässä vaiheessa seisoo ME [aito Human-Principle] ylevästi tanassa Animaten puheenjohtajana. (Kyl tääkin on aika maskuliinista pohdiskelua.)
    18