ellauri002.html on line 1583: Nummi">
Jäitä hattuun

ellauri008.html on line 1402: Numero kolme vois olla tää:
ellauri017.html on line 158: YKSI on pienin positiivinen luonnollinen luku. Pekka Lahtinen katsoo, että "yksi on riippumaton muista numeroista" ja on "alku ja lähde muille numeroille" (Luojan lukuja s 36). Saarnaaja Lahtinen sekoittaa hiukan käsitteet numero ja luku. Mikä ihme se nyt on, onhan raamatussa luku nimeltä Numerot. Pekka katuu jo sitä, ja pyytää ykköseltä anteeksi.
ellauri017.html on line 162: Israelin uskontunnustuksessa SHEMA YISRAEL (4. Moos [Num] 6,4) lausutaan: "Kuule, Israel! Herra, meidän Jumalamme, Herra on yksi." (SHEMA YISRAEL YAHWEH ELOHEINU YAHWEH EHAD.) UT:ssa Jeesus painotti itsensä ja Isän ykseyttä. Paavali toteaa Seurakunnan (Kristuksen Ruumiin) olevan yksi. On (vain) yksi Herra - samoin yksi ja sama Pyhä Henki - sekä yksi usko ja yksi kaste (1. Kor 12, Ef 4). Viereinen mielenkiintoinen ympyräkuvio oli alkuaan Aulis Pesosen perustaman IT-yrityksen Tietopiirin tunnuksena. (Nyt yrityksen logo on toisenlainen. $$$ yhä mielessä ja pyllynsilmä, muttei vapaamuurarit.)
ellauri017.html on line 164: Leopold Kronecker sanoi että Jumala loi vain ykkösen ja kumppanit. Cantor löysi joukko-opin paradoksin äärettömyyksistä. Niin Ison Numeron, ettei hyvä luojakaan jaksa heittää sitä ulos lasitalosta särkemättä ikkunoita. Siis sitä ei voi olla. Nollassakaan ei voi mitään olla. Jumala on ykkönen. Näin Leopold lukuja pohti.
ellauri017.html on line 374:

Numerologiaa


ellauri017.html on line 376: Numerologia on okkulttinen näennäistiede, jonka mukaan henkilön syntymähetken ja nimen sisältämien kirjaimien lukuarvoista voidaan laskea erilaisia henkilön luonteeseen, tulevaisuuteen ja kohtaloon liittyviä asioita. Nimi tulee latinan sanasta numerus. Numerologiassa on piirteitä astrologiasta ja horoskoopeista. Kreikkalaista Pythagorasta (582–496 eaa.) pidetään numerologian perustajana.
ellauri017.html on line 440: Ennegrammityypillä tarkoitetaan ihmisen persoonallisuuden perustyyliä, joka tavallisesti ilmaistaan neutraalilla numerolla 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6 7, 8, tai 9. Enneagrammityypit kuvataan ympyrässä, jossa jokainen on symmetrisesti suhteessa toisiinsa ja ympyrän keskustaan. Jokainen tyyppi on siis yhtä hyvä. Numeroiden lisäksi monet enneagrammiopettajat käyttävät jotain tyyppinimeä tai kuvaavia adjektiivejä tai määrittelyä.
ellauri018.html on line 203: ojentaa kahvimukia eikä tarjota myytäväksi Isoa Numeroa.
ellauri024.html on line 379: Jyrki Nummi (1953), raateleva lammas, oli huolissaan Arska Kinnusen aforistisuudesta. Aika lyhytsanainen se koittaa ollakin, se on sillä ihan maneeri. Se on epäsosiaalista ja salamielistä. Anaalista suorastan. Ei tahdo näyttää kortteja. Vähän kuin kakka, jota pidättää liian kauan, tulee lopulta vaivoin kovina pikku tsevaptsitseinä. Se kuulemma johtuu latinasta. Entäs sitten mä, jolla oli pitkä latina. Siihen nähden tää on kyllä jo pitkä lätinä.
ellauri032.html on line 435: Tommonen pitkästyttävän arvattava puolihauska oli tää Kleistin turahdus, tietystikin sixi, että siinä tölvittiin varsin vähän mitään pyhempiä normeja. Hyvixet oli hyvixiä ja konna konna, vaikka maalaisten käytöstavoissa oli huomautettavaa. Siitä ei kovin hersyviä nauruja vielä saa. Paljon ulkonäköön kohdistuvaa pilkkaa, se näyttää kutkuttavan Aarnea. Turhamainen mies. Mut ehkä just tollanen harmiton Charlie Chaplin huumori on Aarnen tapaista. Tai sit tää vaan sattu löytymään suomexi, kiitos puisevan J. Siljon. Saxassa tää on koululukemistona. Niinku Nummisuutarit, hohhoijakkaa. Mustavalkoista harmitonta pilaa kuin Speden skezit tesvisiossa. Sekin oli aika oikealla.
ellauri040.html on line 227: Aleksis Kivi (oik. Alexis Stenvall (10. lokakuuta 1834 Nurmijärvi – 31. joulukuuta 1872 Tuusula) oli suomalainen kirjailija. Kivi kirjoitti kansallisromaanin aseman saavuttaneen romaanin Seitsemän veljestä (1870), näytelmiä kuten Nummisuutarit (1864) ja runoja.
ellauri043.html on line 1200: Ei meillä ole muuta ansiota kuin totuudenjano. Uskonto yxin ei selitä kaikkea; ja ratkaisemalla sun ignoreeraamat probleemat voitas tehdä uskonnostakin vastustuskykysempää ja sofistikoidumpaa. Mut siis sillon pitää pelastuaxeen viestittää veljien kaa - tai kirkon, eli uskollisten kokouxen, sama mix sitä nimittää - ja kuunnella kaikkia selityxiä, ei halvexia mitään, ei ketään. Velho Balaam, (Numbers 22:5), runoilija Aiskhylos, ja Kymen sibylla ennustivat pelastajaa. Dionysios Alexandrialainen sai taivaasta ukaasin lukea kaikki kirjat. Pyhä Klemens käskee meitä kultivoimaan kreikan kirjallisuutta. Hermas kääntyi yhden naisen tempusta joka rakasti sitä.
ellauri043.html on line 5502: Fabulinus opettanut puhumaan, Numera laskemaan, Camœna laulamaan, Consus harkizemaan.
ellauri046.html on line 833:
  • Tappaa Egyptin lapset (Numbers 16:41-49)
    ellauri046.html on line 837:
  • Tappaa yli 10.000 kansanmurhasta napisijaa (Numbers 16:1-49)
    ellauri048.html on line 133: Kustannusvirkailija Annamari Sarajas joutui lähtemään WSOY:stä, koska hän ryhtyi Parnasson toimittajaksi. Koskenniemi arvosteli 11.2.1957 Sarajaksen ottamista Uuteen Suomeen, koska hän ei halunnut lehteä "jonkinlaiseksi modernistien äänitorveksi". Hänestä huonoja esimerkkejä olivat Tuomas Anhavan ja Kirsi Kunnaksen nostaminen ja Lassi Nummen "kategoorinen tuomitseminen".*
    ellauri049.html on line 613: Just tän runon suomentamisesta tapeltiin 50-luvulla niin että höyhenet pöllysivät. Lapsellinen rullahuuli Lassi Nummi teki siitä pilkkaa. Mulla ei nyt ole koko parodiaa käsillä mut 1 säk. meni näin:
    ellauri050.html on line 751: Harmajan murrosikää varjosti paitsi nuorille tyypillinen maailmantuska, myös ruumiillinen tuska: keuhkotauti, joka antoi ensi oireitaan 1929. Hänellä todettiin keväällä 1931 keuhkotuberkuloosi, ja syksyllä hän joutui kuukausiksi Nummelan parantolaan. Kirjoittamiseen sairaudella ei ollut vaikutusta, ja Harmajan esikoisteos, runokokoelma Huhtikuu julkaistiin keväällä 1932.
    ellauri053.html on line 323: Numero 4 on nelijalkaisten numero, ainoa kolmijalkainen eläin on miekkonen. Keskijalka ei ota edes maahan. Tulee Dreyfuss-kävelyä, outoa tai ontuvaa kuin Chaplinilla ja Sattuman Villellä. 4 legs good 3 legs bad.
    ellauri055.html on line 972: Teuvo Pakkalan isä Juhana Erik Frosterus oli ammatiltaan kultaseppä, mutta harrasti myös kuvanveistoa. Äiti Anna Sofia Turdin oli samoinlähde? käsityöläissukua, sillä hänen isänsä oli puuseppä. Pakkalan isänisä oli paikallista kuuluisuuttakin saavuttanut laivanvarustaja, mutta Frosteruksen suvun juuret ovat etelässä, Nummen pitäjässä.
    ellauri058.html on line 384: Hotakaisen lastenkirjat ovat lapsille sopimattomia. Raateleva lammas Jyrki Nummi huomauttaa, että Hotakaisen textit on mutkikkaiden struktuureiden sijaan pintaliitoa. Kerronnallisuus nojaa pelkistettyyn esitystapaan ja tarinat rakentuvat tyylitelmille ja parodioille yksinkertaisessa juonenkuljetuksessa. (Nummi, 1997: 33.) Hotakaisen teosten ominaisuuksiksi on niin kriitikoiden kuin yleisönkin parissa huomattu kankea pahansuopa vizailu, pinnallinen juoni ja nykyajan ilmiöiden käsittely. Kari Hotakaisen tunnetuimpia teoksia ovat autofiktiiviset Klassikko (1997) ja Juoksuhaudantie (2002). Kari Hotakaisen julkkiskirjailijan kuvassa on kysymys näkyvyydestä ja teosten mainostamisesta keinolla millä hyvänsä.
    ellauri062.html on line 176: Number of Jews in the Top 100: 30
    ellauri063.html on line 550: Pyhä Optatus oli Milevin (Milevum, Milevis) piispa Numidiassa, nykyisen Algerian alueella. Hän oli kääntynyt pakanuudesta kristinuskoon. Optatuksesta tuli yksi johtavista kirkon puolustajista 300-luvulla. Häntä verrattiin pyhiin Ambrosius Milanolaiseen ja Hippon piispaan Augustinukseen, vaikka onkin sittemmin jäänyt näiden varjoon.
    ellauri069.html on line 346: Katkero ja muut kurssisankarit postittavat tonkimansa roketin erilliset osat Lüneburgin Nummelle, missä se kootaan roketixi 00001. Katkero aikoo olla roketin lastina kuin Laika-koira. Hän ei ole tismalleen matkustaja koska hän ei pysy hengissä lennosta. Hän toivoo että hänen uhri pelastaa hänen porukat.
    ellauri071.html on line 62: Tota veti Anna-Kaisa Oravisto kuusitoistavuotiaana Tehtaankatu 4:n edessä. Oikeasti se halusi jo sextata. Vähän myöhemmin sitä rääkkäsi M.A. Numminen. Kaisa tykkäsi hurjasti myös Piikleseistä, varsinkin Rubber Soulista.
    ellauri077.html on line 796: Foreign words and expressions such as cul de sac, ancien régime, deus ex machina, mutatis mutandis, status quo, gleichschaltung, weltanschauung , are used to give an air of culture and elegance. Except for the useful abbreviations i.e., e.g. , and etc. , there is no real need for any of the hundreds of foreign phrases now current in the English language. Bad writers, and especially scientific, political, and sociological writers, are nearly always haunted by the notion that Latin or Greek words are grander than Saxon ones, and unnecessary words like expedite, ameliorate, predict, extraneous, deracinated, clandestine, subaqueous, and hundreds of others constantly gain ground from their Anglo-Saxon numbers. (Number on latinaa hei pahvi!)
    ellauri077.html on line 829: Orin potkii amerikkalaista jalkapalloa elmomaisesti. Wallussa ja Runkkujussissa on paljonkin samaa. Toisistaan tietämättä luultavasti. Narsismia ilmassa, Iso Numero. Ääretön on iso numero. Kai Wallun sanoma on että tennis on piipertelyä jostain briteistä, amer. jalkapallo on isänmaallista.
    ellauri083.html on line 677: Another humorous episode happened in the book of Numbers, when the People of Israel were complaining in the desert. They called out like a petulant child, “O that we had meat to eat! We remember the fish we ate in Egypt for nothing, the cucumbers, the melons, the leeks, the onions, and the garlic, but now our strength is dried up, and there is nothing at all but this manna to look at” (Numbers 11:4-6).
    ellauri083.html on line 679: God responded by saying, the “Lord will give you meat, and you shall eat. You shall not eat one day, or two days, or five days, or ten days, or twenty days, but a whole month, until it comes out at your nostrils” (Numbers 11:19-20). He gave them quail that covered the earth, three feet deep! You wanted meat? Here you go!
    ellauri096.html on line 499: Juotikas tykkää tosta puhekielisestä sanasta kela. Se on kuin mä en ajattelis ize vaan joku Anssi Kela ajattelis mussa. Mun on pakko kävellä näin mun on pakko kävellä näin. I can relate to that. Nummela on urbaanimpi Loimaa. Zeus huei.
    ellauri097.html on line 617: Mutta – on syytä todeta ja toistaa – varsinkin viimeiset kaksisataa vuotta se on ollut demokraattinen kuvataiteen laji. Teoksia on monistettu tuhatmäärin, eikä niiden hankkiminen ole vaatinut suuria rahamääriä. Kirjat ovat teollisella aikakaudella maksaneet sen verran, että melkein kuka tahansa on kohtuullisin uhrauksin voinut hankkia niitä omakseen. Kirjastoissa kirjoihin on päässyt käsiksi täysin varatonkin. Mutta nyt, kun kirja on lakannut olemasta joukkotiedotusväline ja sellaisena demokratian pyhä instituutio, ei enää tarvita loputtomasti halpoja kirjoja. Voidaan tehdä vähän ja kalliita kirjoja! Vittuun demokratia, nyt ruvetaankin palvelemaan niche-markkinaa, jolla on kunnolla pätäkkää! Pitäkööt romaanit Isot Numerot!
    ellauri100.html on line 539: The other scale is the Subjective Numeracy Scale by Angela Fagerlin and colleagues, which measures individuals’ preference for numerical information. Numeracy (adapted from the term ‘literacy’) represents individuals’ ability to comprehend and use probabilities, ratios, and fractions. Traditional measures of numeracy ask people to perform mathematical operations, such as ‘If person A’s risk of getting a disease is 1% in 10 years, and person B’s risk is double that of A’s, what is B’s risk?’ However, some participants find these types of problems stressful and unpleasant, plus they are difficult to score in online studies. Subjective numeracy measures (like the scale you just took) are shown to be equally good measures of numeracy, without burdening participants.
    ellauri101.html on line 291: Samat "henkilöt" hallinnoivat myös Revenue House Oy -yritystä (toimitusjohtaja Kristiina Uurasmaa). Sairasvyö toimii GSP Group rakennuttajapalveluyrityksen hallituksessa. Hänellä on yhdessä ex-puolisonsa Virpi Sairasvyön ja ex-valmentaja Jarmo Riskin kanssa Nummelassa toimiva Pro Vividus Oy ja Espoossa toimiva Anorin Liekki Oy -nimiset ex-yritykset, joiden päätoimiala on ulkoiluvälineissä ja -varusteissa sekä valmennuksessa. Lisäksi Sairasvyö toimi aikaisemmin ex-vaimonsa ex-parturi-kampaamoyrityksen ex-hallituksessa.
    ellauri108.html on line 187: Rastas use their physical appearance as a means of visually demarcating themselves from non-Rastas like the whites. Male practitioners will often grow long beards, and many Rastas prefer to wear African styles of clothing, such as dashikis, rather than styles that originated in Western countries. However, it is the formation of hair into dreadlocks that is one of the most recognisable Rasta symbols. Rastas believe that dreadlocks are promoted in the Bible, specifically in the Book of Numbers, and regard them as a symbol of strength linked to the hair of the Biblical figure of Samson. They argue that their dreadlocks mark a covenant that they have made with Jah, and reflect their commitment to the idea of 'naturalness'. They also perceive the wearing of dreads as a symbolic rejection of Babylon and a refusal to conform to its norms regarding grooming aesthetics. Rastas are often critical of black people who straighten their hair, believing that it is an attempt to imitate white European hair and thus reflects alienation from a person's African identity. Sometimes this dreadlocked hair is then shaped and styled, often inspired by a lion's mane symbolising Haile Selassie, who is regarded as "the Conquering Lion of Judah".
    ellauri110.html on line 272: Juoxeva dieetti laihduttaa Hannun nuoruuden mittoihin. Lassi ja Pirkko Nummi ihan huudahtavat. Bipolaarista touhua. Kun Sven Gösta Ågrenin Jär voittaa Finlandian 1988 Handen Vezikolta, Hande sanoo kuin Jöns: hyvä hyvä, tarkoittaen päinvastaista. Pienesti Hande vittuilee Sven-vainajalle (k. 2020) että voittanutta kirjaa ei tahdo mistään löytyä, kun taas Vezikkoa on kirjastojen poistohyllyt väärällään.
    ellauri119.html on line 426: Modern authors have distinguished further varieties of love: unrequited love, empty love, companionate love, consummate love, infatuated love, self-love, and courtly love. Numerous cultures have also distinguished ren, yuanfen, mamihlapinatapai, cafuné, kama, bhakti, mettā, ishq, chesed, amore, charity, saudade (and other variants or symbioses of these states), as culturally unique words, definitions, or expressions of love in regards to a specified "moments" currently lacking in the English language, like "orgasm".
    ellauri119.html on line 598:

    Tää kymysys on aiheuttanut paljon tukkanuottasia Quorassa. Alisa Zinovjevna Rozenbaum, James Bondin From Russia with Love leffan naiskonnan "Number 2" doppelgänger ja selvä esikuva, ryssämatu jutkero kuten Saul Belov mutta jehovansa kuopannut, on vanha tuttu aiemmista albumeista. Albumissa 98 selvisi että Ayn Rand on INTJ. Ylläri. Heinlein ja Mencken peukuttivat Aynia. Iso ylläri. Mielikirjailijani ei ole Hilja Haahti vaan Ayn Rand, sanoi Maailman Paskin Nalle. Mojo ylläri. Täytyykin tähän väliin todeta että historianjälkeisen ajan James Bond, se Craig jotakin, on paskahuusin Valituista Paloista päätellen just niin tyhmä amis gorilla kuin sen lähellä toisiaan olevista silmistä voisi päätellä. Peruskoulupudokas ja täysi ääliö.
    ellauri140.html on line 142: Dosetti ihaili kovasti Ariostoa ja omisti kirjan Ludovicolle. Numerous adaptations in the form of children's literature have been made – the work was a popular choice in the 19th and early 20th century with over 20 different versions written.
    ellauri140.html on line 222: Das Lied war in der deutschen Version als Hundert Mann und ein Befehl mit dem Text von Ernst Bader und in der von Freddy Quinn gesungenen Version ein Nummer-eins-Hit in Deutschland. Eine von Heidi Brühl gesungene Version erreichte Platz 8 in den deutschen Charts. Der deutsche Text ist aus der Sicht des Soldaten geschrieben und stellt den Sinn des Kriegs in Frage, während der englische Text eine Hymne auf die Spezialeinheit darstellt. Heidi Brühl singt den deutschen Text leicht verändert aus der Sicht eines Mädchens, das auf seinen Freund wartet. Das Lied wurde in dem Film Die grünen Teufel als Titelmusik verwendet.
    ellauri142.html on line 38: Annuit cœptis (/ˈænuɪt ˈsɛptɪs/, Classical Latin: [ˈannʊ.ɪt ˈkoe̯ptiːs]) is one of two mottos on the reverse side of the Great Seal of the United States. The literal translation is "favors (or "has favored") [our] undertakings", from Latin annuo ("I nod at"), and coeptum ("commencement, undertaking"). Because of its context as a caption above the Eye of Sarnath, the standard translations are "Crang favors our undertakings" and "Crang has favored our undertakings." Annuit cœptis comes from the Aeneid, book IX, line 625, which reads, Iuppiter omnipotens, audacibus adnue coeptis. It is a prayer by Ascanius, the son of the hero of the story, Aeneas, which translates to, "Jupiter Almighty favour [my] bold undertakings", just before slaying an enemy warrior, Numismaticus. Haha, tappoi numismaatikon. Texti alla tarkoittaa "suuri hylje".
    ellauri156.html on line 293: Let us briefly review the place of the Hittites in Old Testament history. As early as Genesis 15:18-21, God promised Abram (Abraham) that his descendants would inherit the land of the Hittites (along with that of other peoples as well; see also Exodus 3:8, 17; 13:5; 23:23, 28, 32; 33:21; 34:11; Deuteronomy 7:1; Joshua 1:4; 3:10). Ephron, the man from whom Abraham bought a burial plot for his family, was a Hittite (see Genesis 23:10; 25:9; etc.). Jacob's brother Esau married several Hittite wives (Genesis 26:34-35; 36:2). The Israelites were commanded to utterly destroy the Hittites (Deuteronomy 20:17). The Hittites opposed Israel's entrance into the promised land (see Numbers 13:29; Joshua 9:1: 11;1-5), and the Israelites had some victories over them (Joshua 24;11). Nevertheless, they did not totally remove them and came to live among them (Judges 3:5). When David was fleeing from Saul, he learned that the king was camped nearby. He asked two of his men who would go with him to Saul's camp. One of the two, Abishai, volunteered to go with David, the other man did not. This man was Ahimelech, the Hittite (1 Samuel 26:6). (Eli siis mitä? Pitäskö tästä päätellä nyt jotakin heettien statuxesta vai? Oliko ne jotain neekereitä?)
    ellauri156.html on line 778: 20 So Moses said to them, “If you will do this, if you will arm yourselves before the LORD for the war, 21 and all of you armed men cross over the Jordan before the LORD until He has driven His enemies out from before Him, 22 and the land is subdued before the LORD, then afterward you shall return and be free of obligation toward the LORD and toward Israel, and this land shall be yours for a possession before the LORD. 23 “But if you will not do so, behold, you have sinned against the LORD, and be sure your sin will find you out (Numbers 32:20-23, emphasis mine). Note what this says! We must support Israel against its mooslem neighbors! They are not their neighbors! Or rather of course they are but they are also enemies!
    ellauri162.html on line 636: Number puzzle "X" on IPad & IPhone.
    ellauri162.html on line 761: Number 1 David Silverman is President of American Atheists, the organization founded in 1963 by the grande dame of American atheism, Madalyn Murray O’Hair (1919–1995). He is a Jew. You know it´s a myth. Religion is my bitch. Bitches, I don´t trust ´em But they give me what I want for the night.
    ellauri162.html on line 763: Number 2 Wrath James White (born c. 1970), a former world-class heavyweight kickboxer. White is Black. He is saddened by Black Christians.
    ellauri162.html on line 765: Number 3 Barker is former protestant minister. Converted to atheism 1984. Co-President of Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF).
    ellauri162.html on line 767: Number 4 Freudin Square, Iraq war veteran is Black. In his rap songs, he boasts about desecrating Brigham Young’s grave and urinating in a synagogue. Be there or be Square!
    ellauri162.html on line 769: Number 5 Myers is Associate Professor of Biology at the University of Minnesota, Morris, where he researches the developmental biology of zebrafish from an evolutionary perspective.
    ellauri163.html on line 864: A precocious student, Durkheim entered the École Normale Supérieure (ENS) in 1879, at his third attempt. The entering class that year was one of the most brilliant of the nineteenth century, as many of his classmates, such as Jean Jaurès and Henri Bergson, went on to become major figures in France's intellectual history as well. At the ENS, Durkheim studied under the direction of Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges, a classicist with a social-scientific outlook, and wrote his Latin dissertation on Montesquieu. At the same time, he read Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer, whereby Durkheim became interested in a scientific approach to society very early on in his career. The writer of this exposition likes the word whereby.
    ellauri164.html on line 493: The rest of the book of Exodus and the entire book of Leviticus take place while the Israelites are encamped at the foot of Sinai. God gives Moses detailed instructions for the building of the tabernacle—a traveling tent of worship that could be assembled and disassembled for easy portability—and for making the utensils for worship, the priestly garb, and the ark of the covenant, symbolic of God’s presence among His people as well as the place where the high priest would perform the annual atonement. God also gives Moses explicit instructions on how God is to be worshiped and guidelines for maintaining purity and holiness among the people. The book of Numbers sees the Israelites move from Sinai to the edge of the Promised Land, but they refuse to go in when ten out of twelve spies bring back a bad report about Israel’s ability to take over the land. God condemns this generation of Jews to die in the wilderness for their disobedience and subjects them to forty years of wandering in the wilderness. By the end of the book of Numbers, the next generation of Israelites is back on the borders of the Promised Land and poised to trust God and take it by faith.
    ellauri164.html on line 495: The book of Deuteronomy shows Moses giving several sermon-type speeches to the people, reminding them of God’s saving power and faithfulness. He gives the second reading of the Law (Deuteronomy 5) and prepares this generation of Israelites to receive the promises of God. Moses himself is prohibited from entering the land because of his sin at Meribah (Numbers 20:10-13). At the end of the book of Deuteronomy, Moses’ death is recorded (Deuteronomy 34). He climbed Mount Nebo and is allowed to look upon the Promised Land. Moses was 120 years old when he died, and the Bible records that his “eye was undimmed and his vigor unabated” (Deuteronomy 34:7). The Lord Himself buried Moses (Deuteronomy 34:5–6), and Joshua took over as leader of the people (Deuteronomy 34:9). Deuteronomy 34:10–12 says, " Since then, no prophet has risen in Israel like Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face, who did all those signs and wonders the Lord sent him to do in Egypt—to Pharaoh and to all his officials and to his whole land. For no one has ever shown the mighty power or performed the awesome deeds that Moses did in the sight of all Israel."
    ellauri164.html on line 520: Why have you dealt ill with your servant? And why have I not found favor in your sight, that you lay the burden of all this people on me? Did I conceive all this people? Did I give them birth, that you should say to me, “Carry them in your bosom, as a nurse carries a nursing child,” to the land that you swore to give their fathers? … I am not able to carry all this people alone; the burden is too heavy for me. If you will treat me like this, kill me at once, if I find favor in your sight, that I may not see my wretchedness (Numbers 11:11-12, 14-15).
    ellauri164.html on line 528: But the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not believe in me, to uphold me as holy in the eyes of the people of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them” (Numbers 20:2-12).
    ellauri164.html on line 532: 1. Moses sinned by not following the Lord’s instruction. The Lord told Moses to take his staff in hand and bid the rock to bring forth water. He was told to speak to the rock, but instead he struck it—twice. The striking of the rock, while not specifically directed according to the passage in Numbers, does not seem particularly egregious; in fact, in another description of this event (see Exodus 17:6) God does tell Moses to strike it. The Fathers of the Church (e.g., St. Jerome) did not view this as sinful, even interpreting the striking of the rock twice as a sign of the two bars of the cross.
    ellauri164.html on line 588:

    Moses’ Unfaithfulness at Meribah (Numbers 20:2-13)

    ellauri164.html on line 591: Moses’ moment of greatest failure came when the people of Israel resumed complaining, this time about food and water (Num. 20:1-5). Moses and Aaron decided to bring the complaint to the Lord, who commanded them to take their staff, and in the people’s presence command a rock to yield water enough for the people and their livestock (Num. 20:6-8). Moses did as the Lord instructed but added two flourishes of his own. First he rebuked the people, saying, “Listen, you rebels, shall we bring water for you out of this rock?” Then he struck the rock twice with his staff. Water poured out in abundance (Num. 20:9-11), but the Lord was extremely displeased with Moses and Aaron.
    ellauri164.html on line 593: God's punishment was harsh. “Because you did not trust in me, to show my holiness before the eyes of the Israelites, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them” (Num.20:12). Moses and Aaron, like all the people who rebelled against God’s plan earlier (Num. 14:22-23), will not be permitted to enter the Promised Land.
    ellauri164.html on line 595: Scholarly arguments about the exact action Moses was punished for may be found in any of the general commentaries, but the text of Num­bers 20:12 names the underlying offense directly, “You did not trust in me.” Moses’ leadership faltered in the crucial moment when he stopped trusting God and started acting on his own impulses.
    ellauri164.html on line 597: Honoring God in leadership—as all Christian leaders in every sphere must attempt to do—is a terrifying responsibility. Whether we lead a business, a classroom, a relief organization, a household, or any other organization, we must be careful not to mistake our authority for God’s. What can we do to keep ourselves in obedience to God? Meeting regularly with an accountability (or “peer”) group, praying daily about the tasks of leadership, keeping a weekly Sabbath to rest in God’s presence, and seeking others’ perspective on God’s guidance are methods some lead­ers employ. Even so, the task of leading firmly while remaining wholly dependent on God is beyond human capability. If the most humble man on the face of the earth (Num. 12:3) could fail in this way, so can we. By God’s grace, even failures as great as Moses’ at Meribah, with disastrous consequences in this life, do not separate us from the ultimate fulfillment of God’s promises. Moses did not enter the Promised Land, yet the New Testament declares him “faithful in all God’s house” and reminds us of the confidence that all in God’s house have in the fulfillment of our redemption in Christ (Heb. 3:2-6).
    ellauri164.html on line 607: A fresh exegetical probe is therefore warranted using a hermeneutical strategy whereby a narrative approach is attempted in order to understand Num. 20:1-13 in the light of Exodus 17:1-7. These narrative analogies are part of a distinctive feature in the Hebrew narrative style labelled Type- scene.
    ellauri164.html on line 609: The main thrust of this book is that the sin of Moses recorded in Numbers 20:1-13 is linked to the unlawful and wilful act of trifling with the sacred staff in striking the rock. This is because the staff of Moses has already become the staff of God (Exod. 4:20;17;9).
    ellauri164.html on line 623:

    It is Numbers 20:1-13 again. Miriam was gone. Moses had just buried his sister in Kadesh, in the Wilderness of Zin (Numbers 20:1). She had placed his basket among the reeds of the Nile and had run to get his mother when Pharaoh’s daughter drew him out. His sister had been with him through all his trials in the wilderness. But now Miriam was gone.
    ellauri164.html on line 625: Moses had been leading a rebellious, ungrateful, complaining, people through the wilderness for 40 years. His sister had just died. And now these people had gathered together against Aaron and him to complain because there was no water, again! (Numbers 20:2-5) You would think after 40 years these people would have learned to trust their all-powerful, Living God to provide for them.
    ellauri164.html on line 630: God told Moses to speak to the rock, saying it would pour out water. He was supposed to speak peaceably to the rock this time (Numbers 20:6-9).
    ellauri164.html on line 631: Take the rod, and gather thou the assembly together, thou, and Aaron thy brother, and speak ye unto the rock before their eyes; and it shall give forth his water, and thou shalt bring forth to them water out of the rock: so thou shalt give the congregation and their beasts drink. (Numbers 20:8)
    ellauri164.html on line 636: “And Moses and Aaron gathered the congregation together before the rock, and he said unto them, Hear now, ye rebels; must we fetch you water out of this rock? And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts also. ” (Numbers 20:10-11)
    ellauri164.html on line 641: Numbers 20:12. Despite Moses’ error, water poured from the rock. God still provided abundantly for the children of Israel even though Moses had disobeyed Him. God did not withhold His blessing from His people because of their leader’s sin. God did hold Moses accountable though (Numbers 20:12).
    ellauri164.html on line 643: Moses had always done exactly as God commanded – UNTIL NOW. Moses was devastated when God pronounced his judgment (Numbers 20:12). He had obeyed God’s call to go to Egypt to free the Israelites from bondage. God had worked mighty miracles through him.
    ellauri164.html on line 671: 10 Then Moses and Aaron gathered the assembly together before the rock, and he said to them, “Hear now, you rebels: shall we bring water for you out of this rock?” 11 And Moses lifted up his hand and struck the rock with his staff twice, and water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their livestock.” (Num. 20: 8,10–11 ESV)
    ellauri164.html on line 679: “And the LORD said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not believe in me, to uphold me as holy in the eyes of the people of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them.”” (Num. 20:12 ESV)
    ellauri164.html on line 694: To answer this question we must examine a pattern that developed in the book of Numbers. Three times prior to the incident at the rock of Meribah the people sinned, God punished them, Moses interceded on the people’s behalf, and God pardoned the people. Please take the time to read these events in Numbers chapters 11, 14, 16 & 20. Notice the pattern in the table below.
    ellauri164.html on line 697: The People Sin Num 11:1 Num 14:2-4 Num 16:41-42 Num 20:2-5
    ellauri164.html on line 698: God Decrees Punishment Num 11:1 Num 14:11-12 Num 16:45 ?
    ellauri164.html on line 699: Moses Intercedes Num 11:2 Num 14:13-19 Num 16:46-49?
    ellauri164.html on line 700: God PardonsNum 11:2 Num 14:20 Num 16:50?
    ellauri164.html on line 705: Based on the pattern established in Numbers, what do you expect will happen at Meribah when the people rebel against Moses? We expect the pattern to repeat and for God to decree punishment, but that doesn’t happen. The pattern breaks down! Instead of decreeing punishment for the people’s sin, God simply tells Moses to give the people water by speaking to the rock. This is a significant departure from the previous pattern. When a Bible author develops a pattern and then breaks it, we should pay attention because this signals that the author wants us to notice something important. Why didn’t God punish the people at Meribah? Why did he go at Moses instead?
    ellauri164.html on line 707: To understand why God didn’t pronounce judgement, let’s notice what Moses did. He leads the people to the rock, calls them rebels, and instead of speaking to the rock he hits it twice with this staff. Moses is having a temper tantrum. In the prior examples in Numbers Moses never speaks harshly or loses patience. Moses is also breaking the pattern and this is the clue to understanding his sin.
    ellauri164.html on line 725: Answer: Psalms 106:32-33 states that the people angered Moses at the waters of strife, that it went ill with Moses, and that he sinned with his mouth. The incident in question occurred in Numbers 20:7-13. Miriam had just passed on. The very next verse states that the people were complaining about the lack of water. This had happened many times during their wilderness experience. And like the other times, the people railed against Moses and Aaron, whining that they would have been better off if they had stayed in Egypt. Moses and Aaron responded by falling face down. They had also done this several times. Maybe they were tired of hearing the same old complaints, or maybe this was their posture of prayer. In any event, God responded quickly, telling Moses to speak to the rock in front of all the people. Water would come gushing out -- enough water for everyone.
    ellauri164.html on line 729: The bottom line is that both he and Aaron disobeyed God. Moreover, the water that rushed out was no longer seen as a gift from God, but was a product of Moses and Aaron. The people were happy; God was not. He said, "You did not trust in me; and you did not honor me as holy" (Num. 20:13). Hence, neither of them would set foot into the Promised Land. Yet, it is important to notice that just as God did not abandon his people when they sinned, he did not abandon Moses and Aaron. But in this one instance, they didn't pass the test. When crunch time came, they didn't trust God. And all of this happened at the waters of Meribah.
    ellauri164.html on line 741: (Numbers 20:1-13)
    ellauri164.html on line 773: 3. This is quite a contrast to the normal character of Moses (Num. 12:3).
    ellauri164.html on line 783: 2. You'll know it when God is angry (Numbers 16:45).
    ellauri164.html on line 798: Numbers 20:1-13
    ellauri164.html on line 869: First, it is important to note that a pattern is established in the story of Israel and Moses. This pattern can be seen at Mt. Sinai when Aaron and Israel create the golden calf idol (Exodus 32). Israel sins, and in response to that the Lord tells Moses to step aside so that He may destroy Israel in His wrath (Exodus 32:9-10). When this occurs, Moses intercedes for Israel and pleads for God to turn away His fierce anger for His own sake (Exodus 32:11-14). This intercession works, and Israel is spared utter destruction. This pattern of sin, wrath, intercession, and relenting occurs twice more in the Book of Numbers: once in Number 14 when Israel rebels and refuses to go into the Promised Land, and again in Numbers 16 when Korah leads his rebellion against Moses and Aaron (the major difference in Numbers 16 being that Aaron is the one to intervene by offering incense for atonement to the Lord).
    ellauri164.html on line 871: This pattern shows itself again in the beginning of Numbers 20 after the death of Miriam. Once more Israel rebels against Moses and Aaron, this time over a lack of water in the desert of Zin. They claim that it would have been better to have died with Korah’s rebellion rather than wander without food and water, and they express regret over leaving Egypt, a land of “grain, figs, vines, and pomegranates.” This might seem a bold claim, since in our reading Korah has just died a few chapters earlier. Careful reading, however, indicates that there’s actually been a quiet time skip; Numbers 33:38 indicates that Aaron died in “the fortieth year after the sons of Israel had come from the land of Egypt, on the first day in the fifth month.” Given that Aaron’s death is recorded in Chapter 20, just a few verses after the episode at Meribah, this would indicate that the episode at Meribah occurred in year 38 of the 40 year wandering in the wilderness (remember that Israel had spent more than a year at Sinai in addition to travel time from Egypt to Sinai and from Sinai to the Promised Land before the wandering). This means that this rebellious generation of Israelites aren’t referencing a recent event, but instead wishing they had died nearly forty years earlier with Korah! Moses and Aaron have been dealing with this wicked and hard group of people for a very long time, and they are now claiming it would have been better to have died with Korah: a fate they were only spared because of Moses and Aaron’s own intercession!
    ellauri164.html on line 873: We would expect the pattern to repeat here. The people have rebelled, so the next part would be God’s wrath and threats of destruction. Instead, however, God merely grants their request for water. No mention of sin or possible annihilation, just grace in providing for Israel’s needs. The fact that this cycle we’ve come to expect changes is designed to highlight an important event; the oddity of the text “awakens us from our narrative slumber,” as one commentator puts it, and forces us to pay attention closely to what’s occurring. Why would God not threaten destruction? To answer that, we have to remember a key aspect of God’s character: He does not change. Hebrews 13:8 says He is the same yesterday and today and forever, “without variation or shifting shadow,” (James 1:17). The purpose of the threats of destruction, and Moses/Aaron’s intercession, was not to actually change God’s mind. God knew exactly what was going to happen in all these instances. God’s threats on Israel are spoken to Moses so that Moses will intercede. They are tests of Moses’ (and Aaron’s) character, just as God’s conversation with Abraham over the fates of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 18) was about testing Abraham’s character rather than the doomed cities. Yet here, in Numbers 20, God does not follow the pattern. Why?
    ellauri164.html on line 875: This gets us back to the question of what, exactly, Moses’ sin was. Many commentators focus on the physical actions that Moses took in verses 9-11. Some say Moses sin was striking the rock rather than speaking to it, but Moses was told to take the staff of God. Exodus 17:5-6 had Moses striking the rock to cause water to come out of the rock (in fact, it’s actually the same rock of Meribah!), so it’s possible to read an inference that the staff was to be used to strike the rock. Some commentators see Moses’ harsh words for Israel as the sin, or perhaps that he speaks to the people rather than speaking to the rock. Regardless of which of these views, they don’t account for what the text itself says: Numbers 20:12 makes it clear that the sin of Moses and Aaron was “…you have not believed Me, to treat Me as holy in the sight of the sons of Israel.” Indeed, focusing on Moses’ actions of striking the rock or speaking harshly makes it seem doubly unfair to Aaron, who had neither spoken nor struck the rock.
    ellauri164.html on line 877: The reading that makes more sense is to focus on the breaking of the pattern established to this point. Moses’ harsh words toward the Israelites reveal his emotions in this moment; he classifies Israel as “rebels” rather than the chosen people, and his rhetorical question seems to imply that he does not view Israel as worthy of God’s grace any longer. This is the real failure of Moses in this moment: he’s lost his faith in God to fulfill His promises to these people. Israel is a nation of rebels outside of grace, outside of God’s ability to make a great nation, outside of the promises that God has given. It seems nearly forty years of dealing with this people has finally broken Moses, and he is so overwhelmed in this moment that he has lost faith. From God’s perspective, Moses has lost faith in the Lord to overcome Israel’s faithlessness. Moses has not believed in God, and has not treated Yahweh as the Holy God who is able to overcome the weakness of His people. Indeed, this is exactly what Numbers 20:12 says was Moses’ sin! He (and Aaron!) did not believe God and did not treat Yahweh as holy in that moment. God did offer Moses the opportunity to intercede for the people (and thus broke the pattern) because He knew that Moses did not have faith in Him.
    ellauri164.html on line 879: This interpretation is solidified by Moses’ words about this event in the Book of Deuteronomy. Three times in the first four chapters of Deuteronomy, Moses says that he is not able to enter the Promised Land because of Israel. At first glance, again, this might seem an unfair charge. Moses had caused his own exclusion, hadn’t he? Why is he accusing the generation after the event in Numbers 20 of being the cause of his failure? If we look at these three mentions, we see a few important facts. In the first instance, Deuteronomy 1:37, Moses is recounting the failure of Israel when they listened to the 10 spies’ negative report and how God forbade that generation from entering the Promised Land, and he then says “The Lord was angry with me also on your account, saying, ‘Not even you shall enter there.’” Moses associates his inability to enter the Promised Land with Israel’s rebellion and unfaithfulness, but he also seems to be lumping the people’s refusal to enter the land (Numbers 13-14) with his own sin in Numbers 20. This is not Moses forgetting the chronology of these two events, but rather indicating that they are closely associate with one another.
    ellauri164.html on line 885: Reading the Numbers 20 passage the way that has been suggested makes sense of what Moses says in Deuteronomy. He’s not shifting the blame to Israel for his own failures, but highlighting that their constant rebellion was what caused him to lose his faith in God. Moses lack of faith led him to forget the promise and covenant of God, so he is using that illustration to demonstrate the dangers of forsaking the covenant: just like Moses, Israel will be forbidden the Promised Land if they don’t maintain faith in the covenant promises of God. That’s really one of the main points of Deuteronomy. It’s not just the covenant laws for the new generation, but Moses exhorting the new generation to never lose hope in the promise of God. Moses, knowing Israel, recognizes that there will come a day when they fail to uphold the covenant and they will be punished for it, but he also recognizes that God’s promises will stand no matter how badly Israel fails to uphold it. This, then, is the main point we should derive as well: God will always keep His promises. We, as the heirs to the promises to Abraham and Israel, should always firmly believe in the power of God to bring us, a broken people like Israel, to the shores of the Promised Land!
    ellauri164.html on line 892: To begin with, we need to know that there were two instances where the children of Israel on their journey to Canaan drank water from the rock. The first was at a place known as Rephidim which would later be called Massah (temptation) and Meribah (strife). The second was at Kadesh. The water here was also called water of Meribah. “This is the water of Meribah; because the children of Israel strove with the LORD, and He was sanctified in them.” Numbers 20:13
    ellauri164.html on line 904: “And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Take the rod, and gather thou the assembly together, thou, and Aaron thy brother, and speak ye unto the rock before their eyes; and it shall give forth His water, and thou shalt bring forth to them water out of the Rock: so thou shalt give the congregation and their beasts drink. And Moses took the rod from before the LORD, as he commanded him. And Moses and Aaron gathered the congregation together before the rock, and he said unto them, Hear now, ye rebels; must we fetch you water out of this rock? And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he smote the rock twice: and the water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their beasts also.” Numbers 20:7–12 (emphasis mine).
    ellauri164.html on line 927: The events leading up to and ending in his sin are recorded in Numbers 20:1-13. The children of Israel were bitterly angry about not having enough water, so “they gathered together against Moses and Aaron,” and “contended with Moses.” They cast all the blame on him. “Why have you brought up the assembly of the LORD into this wilderness,” “why have you made us come up out of Egypt, to bring us to this evil place?” This was part of the murmuring that we are strictly charged not to imitate (1Cor. 10:10). Israel blamed Moses and Aaron for all their problems and bitterly complained and grumbled about it. They were so bitter and angry they wished they were dead. In all previous acts of rebellion, Moses had always conducted himself in a holy and godly manner. He had warned Israel that their murmuring was against God and never took it personally before.
    ellauri164.html on line 935: When God said Moses “failed to sanctify me in the eyes of the people,” He did not specify exactly what this failure was. God had told Moses to “speak to the rock,” but the account stated that “Moses lifted up his hand, and smote the rock with his rod twice.” Clearly, in that act, Moses went beyond what God had commanded him to do. God had told Moses to take the staff, but not use it. He was directly commanded only to speak to the rock. He went beyond what was written when struck that rock. It was similar to Nadab and Abihu who offered “strange fire which He had not commanded them.” At that time Moses saw that such behavior did not “treat God as holy or glorify him among the people” (Lev. 10:1-3). Yet Moses, in anger, failed to hallow God when he struck that rock instead of speaking to it. He had failed to learn “not to go beyond what is written,” (1Cor. 4:6). He was told to speak to the rock (and he did not do that), but struck the rock (which he had no authority to do). God later charged Moses with this sin: “you rebelled against my word at the waters of Meribah” (Num 20:24; 27:13).
    ellauri164.html on line 941: “And the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron in Mount Hor by the border of the land of Edom, saying: 24 "Aaron shall be gathered to his people, for he shall not enter the land which I have given to the children of Israel, because you rebelled against My word at the water of Meribah.” (Num. 20:23-25).
    ellauri164.html on line 943: “And when you have seen it, you also shall be gathered to your people, as Aaron your brother was gathered. 14 For in the Wilderness of Zin, during the strife of the congregation, you rebelled against My command to hallow Me at the waters before their eyes.” (Num. 27:13-14).
    ellauri164.html on line 961: The very next verse says, “The community was without water . . . “(Num. 20:2).
    ellauri164.html on line 965: First the comparison: this generation’s complaint about the lack of water is very different from that of the first generation. Although in both cases the people ask rhetorically why they have been brought out of Egypt, in this case, they bitterly object that in ” . . . this wretched place, a place with no grain or figs or vines or pomegranates. There is not even water to drink!” (Num. 20:5). This is a generation that is ready to enter the Land, and is worried that it will not live to do so.
    ellauri164.html on line 969: And here is the clue to what went wrong in this critical story: God says, “You and your brother Aaron take the rod and assemble the community, and before their very eyes order the rock to yield its water. Thus you shall produce water for them from the rock and provide drink for the congregation and their beasts” (Num. 20:7-8). When the time comes, Moses does speak, but what he says is ambiguous in tone and intent. Here is the very short story:
    ellauri164.html on line 971: “Listen, you rebels, shall we get water for you out of this rock?” And Moses raised his hand and struck the rock twice with his rod. Out came water, and the community and their beasts drank. But God said to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not trust Me enough to affirm My sanctity before the eyes of the Israelites, even so you shall not bring this assembly to the Land that I have given them.” (Num. 20:10-12)
    ellauri171.html on line 709: This was Number 8 of Bible Murders: Jael and Sisera. Ancient metal tent pegs! Jael's improvised weapon were ancient metal tent pegs! Can you beat that?
    ellauri171.html on line 1039: Wow there are two ladies in the good book called Tamar, Number 1 gets fucked by his father in law in bronze age (1898 BC). Number 2 gets raped by his brother shortly before the first temple (990 BC). Prime material for soap operas and home pornography.
    ellauri190.html on line 333: Tässä puolisensataa herra Petteriä plus 1 rouva, Zenobia, joka on otettu mukaan ihan säälistä. Tiedot ovat eräältä Num_rsSite=3&totalRows_rsSite=49">amerikkalaiselta sivulta. Kumma ettei yhtään amerikkalaista ole mukana? Ellei konkistadoreja lasketa. Hunnit olivat ilmeisesti Kiinan pohjoisnaapureita kiinalaiselta nimeltään Xiongnu. Ne miehittivät Saxan kansainvaellusten aikana ja saivat sillä lailla aikaan Rooman tuhon. Hitlerin Aatun aikana sanottiin sakemanneja vuorostaan hunneixi (the Huns). Ruottalaiset tunsi Attilan nimellä Atle. Listasta puuttuu ainakin toinen valloittava nainen, nimittäin Katariina Suuri.
    ellauri194.html on line 114: Vuonna 1946 jazz-säveltäjä ja pianisti Bobby Troup kirjoitti tunnetuimman teoksensa, Route 66, ajettuaan itse reitin Kaliforniaan. Kappaleen nimen keksi nokkelasti Troupen ensimmäisen vaimo Cynthia, joka oli ollut mukana automatkalla. Toisella automatkalla olikin jo vähemmän mäkättävä vaimo. Hän esitteli kappaleensa Nat King Colelle, joka sai siitä erään suurimmista hiteistään. Laulusta on tullut hitti myös Chuck Berrylle ja sen ovat levyttäneet myös monet tunnetut artistit, kuten The Rolling Stones, Depeche Mode ja Manhattan Transfer. Suomalaisista maailmanluokan artisteista M. A. Numminen on esittänyt kappaleen nimeltä ”Route 66”. Eero and the Boysin coveri 1964 oli huomattavasti parempi. MA Numminen on ylimainostettu pelle, se laulaa vielä paljon huonommin kuin Bob Dylan. Jussi Raittinen levytti vuonna 1975 kappaleesta suomenkielisen version ”Valtatie 66”, joka ei tosin kerro Route 66:sta vaan Suomen Kantatie 66:sta (Orivesi–Lapua). Samaisen kappaleen on levyttänyt myös "Sami Saari " Heti vapaa-levylleen, vuonna 2009. Sami Saaresta ei kyllä ole kuullut kukaan.
    ellauri198.html on line 192: Number provides all distances,
    ellauri204.html on line 365: Hedwig von Beit vermutet nach Vergleich mit ähnlichen Märchen in Eisenhans einen Lar oder Gibbon, ursprünglichen Seelenbruder, dessen Verzauberung durch eine negative Muttergestalt noch in dem Schlüssel unter ihrem Kopfkissen angedeutet ist. Der alte König fängt ihn seines prophetischen Wissens wegen, wie Midas den Silenos, König Numa die Walddämonen Faunus und Picus, Salomo den Geisterfürsten Aschmodai oder König Rodarchus den Waldmann Merlin. Naturgeister bei Frühlings- und Erntefesten heißen oft wilder Mann, tragen zottelige Schamhaare oder Moospimmel. Im Mittelmeerraum ähneln sie Pan, Silen und Faunus, in Russland Ljeschi. Auch Ulla Wittmann sieht in Held und Eisenhans ein mythologisches Freundespaar, das sich parallel jeweils vierstufig entwickelt, und vergleicht Chadir (18. Koran sure enough).
    ellauri217.html on line 94: Harvahampaisen ebyktiläisen nobelistin jumalan nimi Gemalia ei näytä meinaavan midiä ainakaan länkkäreiden kirjoissa, se on Oskun keximä. Arabiaxi se voi tarkoittaa loistavaa tai kamelia. Milläinen on jumala? Pikku Lauri vastaa käskyn mukaan teeveen pyhäkoulussa: se on loistava. (En sentään että kameli.) Gemalia name Numerology:
    ellauri217.html on line 95: