TWA flight 741 was one of three planes successfully hijacked by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine that day — the hijacking of an El Al plane was foiled by the onboard sky marshals. At the time, I was a 14-year old foreskinned kid living in Trenton, New Jersey, whose only care was how the Baltimore Orioles were doing. This event changed my life, as well as the lives of the other 350 people who were on those planes. Mostly for the better, we became instant celebrities.

Imagine the horror and disgust that I, my family and other hijack victims experienced when we read that Leila Khaled, one of the hijackers directly involved in the 1970 attacks, had been invited by San Francisco State University to address a forum on Gender, Justice and Resistance. Ms. Khaled is a convicted terrorist. She has paid her debt to society. She is a member of the PFLP. She is a symbol not of justice and resistance, but of wanton terrorism and death. Khaled spent only a few days in jail. After her failed hijacking of the El Al plane, she was transferred by the Israeli sky marshals to the British police and released in exchange for hostages when a fifth plane was hijacked to secure her freedom.
ellauri219.html on line 231: In contrast to Mae West (No.3), Fred Astaire was reportedly thrilled to be asked to appear on the Sgt Pepper album cover. A child star who initially started dancing with his sister on stage, it was with Ginger Rogers that Fred made his greatest mark, in a series of classic Golden Age movies including Top Hat and Swing Time. He also appeared with John and Yoko in the 1972 television film Imagine. Limainen mafioso luikero.
ellauri324.html on line 748: about gun violence. Imagine that. 50,000+ deaths from
ellauri502.html on line 88: 3. The Cop and the Judge Analogy. Imagine a man who is a police officer (NATO chief) by day, but his dad is the judge (POTUS). If someone asks the cop, "When is my trial date?" "When will the Strait of Ormuz open?" the cop might say, "I don't know, only Dad knows." Even though they are part of the exact same family and legal system, the cop genuinely does not have the Epstein file in front of him. It isn't his job or his authority to know—it belongs entirely to the Father's office. So, Jesus wasn't lying or playing a trick; He was genuinely living under human limitations at that moment, leaving the final authority up to the Father. Does looking at the Father and Son as two separate minds inside the same Godhead change how you see the statement? Tekoälyn antamat vastaukset voivat sisältää virheitä. Lue lisää
ellauri502.html on line 142: 1. Knowing About a Thing vs. Experiencing a Thing There is a famous thought experiment in philosophy called "Mary’s Room." Imagine a brilliant scientist named Mary who lives her whole life in a black-and-white room. She learns everything there is to know about the physics and biology of color. She knows wavelengths, how the eye processes light, and exactly what happens in the brain when someone sees red. But Mary has never actually seen the color red. When Mary finally steps outside and sees a red apple, does she learn something new? Theologians say yes. She didn't gain new information, but she gained the experience of redness. Before the incarnation, God knew everything about human suffering, but He had never suffered as a creature. The road test wasn't to gather data; it was to turn data into intimate, shared experience.
ellauri502.html on line 144: 2. The Road Test Wasn't for God—It Was for Us God didn't need the road test to convince Himself of what it felt like. He did it to convince us that He understood. Imagine you are going through a horrific tragedy, and a therapist says, "I have read 500 textbooks on your specific trauma. I know exactly how it works." You might respect their degree, but you won't necessarily feel understood. Now imagine someone walks in who says, "I survived the exact same tragedy. I felt the same cold sweat." You trust them instantly. This concept is highlighted in Hebrews 4:15, which explains that the incarnation allowed God to directly empathize with human weaknesses by being tempted, just as people are. The road test was therefore a public demonstration of understanding, ensuring that humanity knows God truly shares in the human experience rather than observing from afar. Tekoälyn antamat vastaukset voivat sisältää virheitä. Lue lisää
ellauri505.html on line 246: To expose the illusion of free will, Spinoza uses the analogy of a rolling stone: Imagine a stone is kicked and receives a certain amount of motion. As it rolls, the stone suddenly becomes conscious. It thinks, "I want to roll right now, and I am choosing to move entirely by my own desire." Humans are exactly like this stone. We are propelled by a complex web of physical desires, biological drives, and psychological conditioning. Because we cannot see the invisible "kick" that started our desire, we mistake our consciousness of the desire for a "free choice."
14