ellauri052.html on line 85: I find this judgement troubling. Certainly, one can agree that Herzog is lavish and intense. But through his eyes, we see women as very peculiar creatures. We meet a devotee of sex in Herzog’s lover, Ramona, the sad, enigmatic, emotionless pencils that are Valentine’s wife and Herzog’s first wife, and the castrating sex bomb that is Madeline. Very rarely do we feel that these characterisations are different from these characters’ reality—the novel seems to suggest that these women really are as limited as Herzog sees them.
ellauri052.html on line 89: Harold Bloom is right to dismiss Bellow’s female characters of the later novels as “third-rate pipe dreams.” When a reader, holding Humboldt’s Gift in his hands, looks back at Augie March, the journey Saul Bellow has taken in his depiction of people is a very sad one. There is no way to compare the daring, principled Mimi Villars, Augie March’s one equal in oration, to the simple Ramona (Herzog), or to the comically shallow Renata (Humboldt’s Gift). Where is a woman equal to Augie’s Thea in these later books?
ellauri052.html on line 934: Ultimately, much of the book revolves around a perceived opposition between “young Saul,” the politically radical, amorously multitasking free spirit who raised him, and “old Saul,” the reactionary, race-baiting friend of authority and Allan Bloom who occupied his father’s body for its final 40 years. Greg had a front-row seat for Bellow’s supposed conversion, after the rise of black power and the Six Day War, to the unfashionable conservatism that remains the unspoken reason his books aren’t read much in America today. He is thus well-placed to describe how that change—dramatically evident in Mr. Sammler’s Planet (1970), the neo-con novel par excellence, but also in Herzog—manifested itself in private.
ellauri052.html on line 942: It may be helpful to note here that Bellow’s fame, already growing after The Adventures of Augie March, exploded after the publication of Herzog in 1964—the same year Daniel, his youngest son, was born. By the time the newly rich writer, urged by his third wife, moved into a fancy co-op on Lake Michigan, Greg already possessed enough of what he thought were his own opinions to dislike the white plush carpets, the 11 rooms “filled with fancy furniture and modern art.” Reminding the reader he was “raised by a frugal mother and a father who had no steady income,” Greg says that he “found the trappings of wealth in their new apartment so repellent that I complained bitterly to Saul,” who replied that he didn’t care about the new shiny things so long as he could still write—which he could. “As I always had, I accepted what he said about art at face value,” Greg admits, but he stopped visiting the new place. After the marriage deteriorated and Saul moved out, 3-year-old Daniel, in the words of ex-child-therapist Greg, “took to expressing his distress” by peeing on the carpets. “I have to admit that the yellow stains on them greatly pleased me,” Greg writes—for once showing off the Bellovian touch.
ellauri052.html on line 970: know whether she was sleeping with Bellow yet; “they were all placing bets.” She started an affair with Bellow’s friend Jack Ludwig (the prototype for Gersbach in Herzog) only after she learned of her husband’s many infidelities.
ellauri052.html on line 977: The most important person in Bellow’s life—Maury, his oldest brother. As Leader shows, Maury was both the driving force in Bellow’s Americanization and a major presence in his work. Parents and wives came and went, but Maury remained: Simon in Augie March, Shura in Herzog, Julius in Humboldt’s Gift. As peremptory and violent as their father but more competent, Maury epitomized the cult of power and material success that both fascinated and repelled Bellow. “I recognized in him the day-to-day genius of the U.S.A.,” Bellow said in an interview with Philip Roth. In the same conversation, Roth observed that Maury’s reckless, angry spirit was “the household deity of Augie March.” By the time Maury finished law school, he had already started collecting graft for a corrupt Illinois state representative, skimming off the top for himself and his mother. A charismatic ladies’ man with an illegitimate son, Maury was “very proud of his extraordinary group of connections, his cynicism, his insiderhood,” Bellow told Roth. Maury was disdainful of his brother’s nonremunerative choice of profession, which he considered luftmenschlich—frivolous, impractical.
ellauri132.html on line 859: Mit der Übernahme der Grenzboten begann seine Karriere als Journalist. In der Wochenzeitschrift verfasste Freytag auch politisch kritische Artikel, so unter anderem über die Niederschlagung des schlesischen Weberaufstandes, was eine steckbriefliche Fahndung durch Preußen zur Folge hatte. Er ersuchte deshalb seinen Freund Herzog Ernst von Sachsen-Coburg-Gotha um politisches Asyl und zog 1851 nach Siebleben bei Gotha. Herzog Ernst verlieh ihm 1854 den Hofratstitel. Noi Gothat on kai niit kuningatar Victorian sukulaisia.
ellauri145.html on line 154: Christian Dietrich Grabbe (1801–1836) oli saksalainen näytelmäkirjailija. Hän kirjoitti useita näytelmiä, joiden vahvin puoli ei ole esitettävyys mutta joissa ilmenevä luonteenerittely on usein nerokas, joskin toisinaan erikoinen ja keinotekoinen. Hänen draamansa Herzog Theodor von Gothland on osaksi mauton, mutta osaxi suurisuuntainen ja syväajatuksinen. Hänen muista draamateoksistaan ovat huomattavia Don Juan und Faust (1829), Kaiser Friedrich Barbarossa (1829), Kaiser Heinrich VI (1830), Napoleon oder die hundert Tage (1831), Hannibal (1835) ja Die Hermansschlacht (julk. 1838). Monet arvostelijat pitivät aikoinaan Grabbea Heinrich von Kleistin rinnalla Friedrich Schillerin jälkeen Saksan suurimpana draamaerona. Minnes unohtui Scherz, Satire, Ironie und tiefere Bedeutung. Lustspiel, geschrieben 1822, Änderungen bis 1827. Uraufführung München 1907, jota suizuttavat Aarne sekä Antero? Vähän tuntuu siltä että Anterolle ja sen mielirunoilijoille olis kaikille pitänyt jakaa kirja "Be Your Own Best Friend". Grabbessa lisää ensi numerossa, jossa Grabbe ja Klopstock razastavat Vormärzin kuuman taivaan alla, te mukana!
ellauri146.html on line 124: Rudolf von Gottschall (1823–1909) oli saksalainen kirjailija, aikansa Saksan monipuolisimpia. Gottschall oli lyyrikko (Neue Gedichte), eepikko (Carlo Zeno, Maja), hän kirjoitti romaaneja (Im Banne des schwarzen Adlers) ja erityisesti näytelmiä: hänen merkittäviä murhenäytelmiään ovat Mazeppa, Der Nabob, Katharina Howard, König Karl XII, Herzog Bernhard von Weimar ja Amy Robsart. Hän kirjoitti myös komedioita, kuten Fix und Fox, Die Diplomaten, Der Spion von Rheinsberg. Mit einer Doktorarbeit über die römischen Strafen bei Ehebruch wurde er 1846 in Königsberg promoviert. De adulterii poenis iure romano constitutis. Gottschalls fortschrittliches Schaffen war zu seinen Lebzeiten geachtet, seine Dramen wurden gern gespielt. Seine Werke zeichneten sich vor allem durch unabhängige Urteilskraft, aber auch durch zeitbezogene Kritik aus, was mit dazu beigetragen hat, dass er nach seinem Tode schnell in Vergessenheit geriet. Lisäksi hän oli kirjallisuushistorioitsija ja esteetikko. Kirjallisuudentutkijana hän julkaisi teoksen Poetik. Vittuako se selitti tossa suorasanaisesti mitä Grabbe kertoo ize paljon hauskemmin? Taitaa olla kuivuri. Saima Harmaja on suomentanut Gottschallin runon "Ken nokkivi ikkunaa? Lupsa!", jonka on säveltänyt Kari Haapala.
ellauri162.html on line 740: 1827 wechselte Forberg nach Hildburghausen und wurde außerordentlicher Beisitzer der Fotzenpolizeiabteilung der herzoglichen Landesregierung. 1829 wurde er mit voller Besoldung in den Ruhestand versetzt. 1840 erschien sein „Lebenslauf eines Verschwollenen“. 1848 starb Forberg nach sechswöchiger Krankheit im Alter von 77 Jahren als Herzoglich Sachsen-Meiningischer Geheimer Kanzleirat in Hildburghausen.
ellauri185.html on line 855: In Leader's Bellow biography Vol 2, “Love and Strife,” the novel “Herzog” is published on the very first page and reaches No. 1 on the best-seller list, supplanting John le Carré’s ‘The Spy Who Came In From the Cold.’ Never again would Bellow, about to turn 50 years old, lack for wealth, power, awards or flunkies to stand by him, ready to take his coat and do his bidding. The temptation for someone in his position was to become an insufferable, spoiled monster. And Bellow quickly gave in to temptation.
ellauri191.html on line 1340:
ellauri198.html on line 56: "... Näyn pohtineen tässä kirjassa ja myöhemmin Herzogissa sitä, kuinka yksilö voi kiertää tämän laajan kaupallisen yhteiskunnan kontrollia tulematta nihilistixi tai kommunistixi, välttää tyhjän kumouksellisuuden ja sensemmoisen mielettömyyden. Olen pohtinut, onko muita, luonteikkaampia metkuilun ja vapaan valinnan muotoja... Juu ja onhan niitä, esim. silmään kusenta ja vedätys. Olen yrittänyt osoittaa kirjoissani, ettei totuus välttämättä ole kaikki kaikessa. Ehkä on myös vaihtoehtoisia totuuksia jotka ovat dolce vitan puolella. Olen valmis myöntämään, että olemme broidini kanssa parantumattomia valehtelijoita ja moukkia ja että meillä on täysi syy pelätä totuutta, mutta en silti aio lakata toivomasta että selviämme tästä ilman syytteitä. Ehkä kaikesta huolimatta on sellaisiakin lurjuksia, jotka ovat ystäviämme maailmankaikkeudessa."
ellauri222.html on line 68: In Leader's Bellow biography Vol 2, “Love and Strife,” the novel “Herzog” is published on the very first page and reaches No. 1 on the best-seller list, supplanting John le Carré’s ‘The Spy Who Came In From the Cold.’ Never again would Bellow, about to turn 50 years old, lack for wealth, power, awards or flunkies to stand by him, ready to take his coat and do his bidding. The temptation for someone in his position was to become an insufferable, spoiled monster. And Bellow quickly gave in to temptation.
ellauri222.html on line 107: This notion that Bellow’s achievement as a novelist was redemptive of the form was a consistent theme in the reviews up through “Herzog.” So was the notion that his protagonists were representatives of the modern condition. After “Herzog,” those reactions largely disappeared. People stopped fretting about the death of the novel, and Bellow’s protagonists started being treated as what they always were, oddballs and cranks. But the critical reception of Bellow’s books in the first half of his career funded his reputation. It cashed out, ultimately, in the Nobel Prize. Nobels are awarded to writers who are judged to have universalized the marginal.
ellauri222.html on line 145: I have just given you the back story and the dramatis personae of “Herzog.” “Herzog” is a novel about a forty-seven-year-old man having a nervous breakdown after learning that his much younger wife, who has left him abruptly, had been cheating on him with his closest friend. The man seeks succor in the arms of a loving, patient, and understanding woman. There is at least one respect in which the novel is not based on real life: Bellow didn’t have a nervous breakdown. He wrote “Herzog” instead.
ellauri222.html on line 149: “Herzog” is a revenge novel. The ex-wife, Madeleine, is a stone-cold man-killer. Her lover, Valentine Gersbach, is described as a “loud, flamboyant, ass-clutching brute.” Ludwig had a Ph.D. and a damaged foot; Bellow makes Gersbach a radio announcer with a wooden leg. The Herzog character is passive, loving, an innocent soul who cannot make sense of a world in which people like his estranged wife and her lover can exist. He is an ex-university professor, the author of a distinguished tome called “Romanticism and Christianity.” The Rosette Lamont character, called Ramona, is a sexpot with a heart of gold; she specializes in intimate candlelight dinners and lacy lingerie. She is a professor of love, not French.
ellauri222.html on line 151: “Herzog” was nevertheless received the way all Bellow’s novels had been received: as a report on the modern condition. Many of the critics who reviewed it—Irving Howe, Philip Rahv, Stanley Edgar Hyman, Richard Ellmann, Richard Poirier—knew Bellow personally and knew all about the divorce. (Poirier was an old friend of Ludwig’s; the review he published, in Partisan Review, was a hatchet job.) None of these reviewers mentioned the autobiographical basis of the book, and several of them warned against reading it autobiographically, without ever explaining why anyone might want to. The world had no way of knowing that the story was not completely made up.
ellauri222.html on line 153: Howe wrote that “Herzog” was a novel “driven by an idea”—the idea that modern man can overcome alienation and despair. Howe could see the appeal of this idea, but he was worried that it might not have been “worked out with sufficient care.” The reviewer in the Times Book Review thought that the novel offered “a credo for the times.” “The age is full of fearful abysses,” the reviewer explained. “If people are to go ahead, they must move into and through these abysses,” and so on.
ellauri222.html on line 155: Bellow must have been tickled to death. The inventive feature of “Herzog” is a series of letters that the protagonist, in his misery, composes not only to Madeleine and Gersbach but to famous people (like President Eisenhower) and philosophers (like Heidegger and Nietzsche). These long letters, unfinished and unmailed, are sendups of an intellectual’s effort to understand human behavior by means of the conceptual apparatus of Mortimer Adler’s Great Books. Herzog is a comic figure, a holy fool, a schlimazel with a Ph.D. The whole point of his story is that when you are completely screwed the best you can hope for is a little sex and sympathy. The Western canon isn’t going to be much help.
ellauri222.html on line 157: The determination to consider the novel strictly as fiction extended even to its characters. Rosette Lamont reviewed the novel. She, too, treated the book as pure make-believe. She breezed right by the Ramona character (“Her religion is sex, a welcome relief from Madeleine’s phony conversion . . . but Herzog is too divided in his mind, too busy with resentment to free himself from a heavy conscience. Besides he is suspicious of pleasure, having learned Julien Sorel’s lesson,” and so on). She concluded with the thought that at the end of the novel Herzog enters into “a theandric relationship with the world around him.”
ellauri222.html on line 161: You can see the biographical problem. From the beginning, Bellow drew on people he knew, including his wives and girlfriends and the members of his own family, for his characters. In “Augie March,” almost every character—and there are dozens—was directly based on some real-life counterpart. Most of “Herzog” is a roman à clef. Leader therefore decided to treat the novels as authoritative sources of information about the people in Bellow’s life. When Leader tells us about Jack Ludwig and Sondra Tschacbasov, he quotes the descriptions of Gersbach and Madeleine in “Herzog.” In the case of the many relatives with counterparts in “Augie March,” this can get confusing. You’re not always sure whether you’re reading about a person or a fictional version of that person.
ellauri222.html on line 169: “Herzog,” too, sags in the middle, a long episode in which Herzog reconnects with Ramona. But Bellow came up with a brilliant solution for the second half. Waiting in a courthouse to see his lawyer, Herzog sits in on a trial. A woman and her boyfriend are being tried for murdering her small child, whom they have tortured and beaten to death. The woman is mentally unfit; Herzog hears evidence that she has been diagnosed with a lesion on her brain. (A diabolical touch: Sasha had been diagnosed with a brain lesion.)
ellauri222.html on line 171: Horrified that Madeleine and Gersbach might be abusing his child (in the novel, a girl), Herzog rushes off to his deceased father’s house, finds a gun his father owned, and goes to Madeleine’s. It is evening. He creeps into the yard and watches Madeleine and Gersbach through the window, loaded pistol in hand. What he sees is an ordinary domestic scene. Gersbach is giving the little girl a bath. Herzog creeps away.
ellauri222.html on line 173: Actually, these episodes were not entirely invented. Bellow lifted them straight out of “The Brothers Karamazov.” A child tortured by its parents is Ivan Karamazov’s illustration of the problem of evil: what kind of God would allow that to happen? And Herzog with his gun at the window is a reënactment of Dmitri Karamazov, the murder weapon in his hand, spying through the window on his father. Dmitri is caught and convicted of a murder he desired but did not commit. “Herzog,” though, is a comedy. The next day, Herzog gets in a minor traffic accident and the cops discover the loaded gun in his car. But, after some hairy moments in the police station, he is let go. Desperately searching the Great Books for wisdom, Herzog briefly finds himself living in one. He can’t wait to get out.
ellauri222.html on line 181: But there is usually one fully imagined character in Bellow’s books, one character whose impulses the author understands and sympathizes with, whose sufferings elicit his compassion, and whose virtues and defects, egotism and self-doubt, honorable intentions and less than honorable expediencies are examined with surgical precision and unflinching honesty. That character is the protagonist—Augie, Herzog, Chick, even Tommy Wilhelm, in “Seize the Day,” who tries to leverage his pain to win respect. Their real-life counterpart is, of course, Saul Bellow, whose greatest subject was himself.
ellauri222.html on line 221: Bellow was born Solomon Bellow in Lachine, Quebec, in 1915, two years after his parents had arrived there from St Petersburg. When he was nine, the family moved to the Humboldt Park neighbourhood of Chicago. His mother, Liza, died when Saul was 17, but not before she had passed on to him her love of the Jewish Bible (he learned Hebrew at four). His first serious critical success was The Adventures of Augie March (1953), but it was not until his 1964 novel, Herzog, became a bestseller that he earned any real money. His elder brothers, both businessmen, were by this time making serious cash, and regarded him, he once said, as "some schmuck with a pen". Mary Cheever, the wife of John Cheever, believed the two got on so well because "they were both women-haters". He has nothing good to say about feminism. Bellow has a go at Hannah Arendt and Mary McCarthy (the one is "rash", the other "stupid"). In 1994, however, he ate a poisonous fish in the Caribbean, and fell into a coma that lasted five weeks. He dreaded a loss of virility.
ellauri222.html on line 231: this time the overall effect was not satisfactory. I was particularly aware of the absence of distance that the writer must put space between himself and the characters in his book. There should be a certain detachment from the writer's own passions. I speak as one who in Herzog committed the same sin. There I hoped that comic effects might protect me. Nevertheless I crossed the border too many times to raid the enemy camp. But then Herzog was a chump, a failed intellectual and at bottom a sentimentalist. In your case, the man who gives us Eve and Sylphid is an enragé, a fanatic-for-real.
ellauri222.html on line 727: The first novel to display Bellow's characteristic expansiveness and optimism, The Adventures of Augie March presents a dazzling panorama of comically eccentric characters in a picaresque tale narrated by the irrepressible title character, who defends human possibility by embracing the hope that "There may gods turn up anywhere." Subsequent novels vary in tone from the intensity of Seize the Day to the exuberance of Henderson the Rain King to the ironic ambiguity of Herzog, but all explore the nature of human male freedom and the tensions between the individual's need for self and the needs of society. Augie March, Tommy Wilhelm, Eugene Henderson, and Moses Herzog all yearn to please themselves by finding the beauty in life. By creating these highly individualistic characters and the milieu in which they move, Bellow reveals the flashes of the extraordinary in the ordinary that make such fun possible and rejects the attitude that everyday life must be trivial and ignoble. It is like that just for the losers.
ellauri222.html on line 757: Because Bellow refuses to devalue human potential in even his bleakest scenarios, his novels often come under attack for their affirmative endings. Augie hails himself as a new Columbus, the rediscoverer of America; Henderson, while triumphantly returning home with his new charges, dances with glee, "leaping, leaping, pounding, and tingling over the pure white lining of the grey Arctic silence." Herzog inexplicably evades his fate, emerging from the flux of his tortured mind to reclaim his sanity and his confidence in the future. Yet, the victories of Bellow's heroes are not unqualified, but rather as ambiguous and tenuous as is the human condition itself. As a new Columbus, Augie speaks from exile in Europe; in holding the orphan child, Henderson recalls the pain of his separation from his own father; by renouncing his self-pity and his murderous rage at his ex-wife Madeleine, Herzog reduces but does not expiate his guilt. Nonetheless, these characters earn whatever spiritual victory they reap through their penes and their refusal to succumb to doubt and cynicism. Through their perseverance in seeking the truth of human existence, they ultimately renew themselves by transcending to an intuitive spiritual awareness that is no less real because it must be taken on faith.
ellauri238.html on line 459: Zur Welt kam Elisabeth, die Else genannt wurde, in der Elberfelder Herzogstraße 29. Sie wurde zu Else Lasker-Schüler, die Dichter*in, die ihre Welt aus dem Tal der Wupper und den Sprachwelten des Talmuds in Gedichten, in Prosa und Theaterstücken einfing. Eine deutsche Poet*in, die Deutschland und uns Kerndeutschen nah sein müsste, ist ihr Leben und Werk doch so tief von der Geschichte durchzogen, welche die unsrige ist. Meist wird sie als deutsch-jüdische Dichter*in wahrgenommen, aber dies marginalisiert und führt aus dem künstlerischen Erfahren und Lesen fort. Ihre Poet*innensprache war deutsch und damit hat sie das Sprachland Deutschland in eine dichte Höhle geführt, wie wenige vor ihr und nicht viele nach ihr. Und auch diejenigen, die wie sie einen eigenen Dichterkosmos hatten und haben, wie Rose Ausländer, Paul Celan, Nelly Sachs, Hilde Domin, Hertha Kräftner sowie Gottfried Benn, Rainer Maria Rilke, Peter Huchel, Reiner Kunze oder (aus Rumänien) Herta Müller, Rolf Bossert und Richard Wagner sollten werkimmanent und literaturästhetisch wahrgenommen und nicht in Bindestrich-Kästchen – weder religiös noch regional – segmentiert werden. Deutschland, Deutschland ist das Dach für alle, Deutschland Deutschland über alles, die Knechtschaft dauert nur noch kurze Zeit.
ellauri238.html on line 583: Pena suomensi Bellowilta pari nidettä, Tuula2n aikana Herzogin. Aihe sopi sille hyvin, vaikkei se osannutkaan englantia kunnolla. Siinä ylpistynyt juho suomensi toista samanlaista. Varmaan se lunttasi jostain ruozinnoxesta. Ei se ollut oikein hyvä oikein missään.
ellauri328.html on line 225: Aloysia Anna Viktoria Freifrau von Eichendorff, Geburtsname Freiin von Larisch, auch: Loiska, poetisch: Luise, Liebchen (* 18. Juli 1792 in Niewiadom, Herzogtum Ratibor; † 3. Dezember 1855 in Neisse, Landkreis Neisse) war eine preußische Adelige sowie Ehefrau des Dichterjuristen Joseph von Eichendorff.
ellauri334.html on line 250: Herzog-Hauck, Real-Encyc. (jossa aiheen moderni kirjallisuus annetaan);
ellauri339.html on line 565: Ensimmäiset naiset ja herrat: Elena Zelenska Andra Levite Diana Nausediene Amelie Derbodrangien Michel Michal Herzog Elke Budenbender Emine Erdogan Doris Schmidauer Rossana Maria Briseño Annick Pedders Mareva Grabowski-Mitsotakis Sofia Maria de Lourdes Soodeau Ferna Gréda Eliza Eliza Gréfi Maria Benso Eliza zavet ja Elizabeth Bavaria Gheorgievska Agata Kornhauser-Duda Tamara Vucic Jill Biden Laura Bush Brigitte Macron Lidia Djukanovic. Moderaattori: Hanna Homonai Pers Morgan.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 523: André Maurois, pseudonyme d’Émile Salomon Wilhelm Herzog, né le 26 juillet 1885 à Elbeuf et mort le 9 octobre 1967 à Neuilly-sur-Seine, est un romancier, biographe, conteur et essayiste français.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 524: Issu d´une famille de drapiers juifs alsaciens, il est le fils d´Ernest Herzog et d´Alice Lévy, et le petit-fils de Salomon Herzog (1818-1876) et Émilie Fraenckel (1828-1891), originaires de Ringendorf.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 532: Le maréchal Pétain soutiendra sa candidature à l´Académie française ; il y est élu le 23 juin 1938, au fauteuil 26, qu´occupait René Doumic. Respecté de ses pairs, il restera assis dans le fauteuil près de trente ans. Par un décret du président de la République du 27 juin 1947, il est autorisé à changer de patronyme de Herzog en André-Maurois. Son nom de plume devient ainsi son nom officiel.
xxx/ellauri128.html on line 536: In his memoirs, he calls his father “bashful” and his mother “reserved.” Between them, they filled the house with “melancholy reticences and unexpressed doubts.” Some of the silence surrounded a particular subject: the family’s Jewishness. This was not exactly hidden, but it was not brought to the fore, either. Maurois, who was born Émile Herzog on July 26, 1885, found out that he was Jewish at the age of about six, when a friend at the local Protestant church told him so. His parents confirmed it, but they also spoke highly of Protestantism.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 73: Pyylevän ja pyllynruman Gonorrhén rivot lastut saivat miesmäisen George Sandin kuohuxiin. Sandin kuoharia lipittivät Musset nuorena ja Flaubert vanhana. Andre Maurois toimi molempien elämäkerturina, pitäisikö lukea. Elsassin juutalainen Herzog ei tainnut kyllä olla mikään huumormies. Sen perhe oli seinäverkon kutojia. Herttuasta tuli maailmansodan jälkeen huono kuningas. Se oli vähän tollanen sakkolihan mezästäjä kuin Valesnesin herra. Munasäkillä on kyllä sana hallussa, sitä ei käy kieltäminen:
xxx/ellauri259.html on line 593: Sønderjylland oder Süderjütland bezeichnet geographisch den Südteil der jütischen Halbinsel. Historisch betrachtet ist Süderjütland eine dänische Bezeichnung für das Gebiet, auf dem sich das Herzogtum Schleswig entwickelte. Dieses reichte von der Eider bis an die Königsau (dänisch Kongeå).
xxx/ellauri259.html on line 599: Parallel zur Bezeichnung Süderjütland kam bereits im 10. Jahrhundert der Name Schleswig auf. Sie findet sich beispielsweise in der Namensgebung der zwischen Schlei und Eider gelegenen Mark Schleswig, die von 934 bis 1025 Teil des Stammesherzogtums Sachsen war und von 962 bis 1025 unter den Kaisern Otto I., Otto II., Otto III., Heinrich II. und Konrad II. die nördliche Grenzmark des Heiligen Römischen Reiches bildete. Im 12. Jahrhundert nahm der letzte Jarl Knud Lavard den Titel Herzog (dux Jucie) an.
xxx/ellauri259.html on line 601: Bis 1500 wurden die Begriffe Schleswig und Süderjütland rund fünfhundert Jahre synonym auf deutsch und dänisch gebraucht, doch wurde das Herzogtum seit der Herrschaft der Schauenburger Herzöge Ende des 14. Jahrhunderts überwiegend nach der Residenzstadt Schleswig benannt, dies wurde in der frühen Neuzeit schließlich der gebräuchlichere Ausdruck. Erst im Zuge des aufkommenden Nationalismus im 19. Jahrhundert wurde der Begriff Sønderjylland/Süderjütland von dänischer Seite wieder verstärkt verwendet. 1895 wurde die Verwendung des Begriffs schließlich von preußischer Seite verboten.
xxx/ellauri259.html on line 603: Nach seiner Niederlage im Deutsch-Dänischen Krieg musste Dänemark im Wiener Frieden auf Sønderjylland verzichten. Es kam unter preußische Verwaltung. Nach dem Sieg Preußens über Österreich erfolgte eine Neuordnung aufgrund des Prager Friedens von 1866: Schleswig wurde mit den Herzogtümern Holstein und Lauenburg zur preußischen Provinz Schleswig-Holstein vereinigt. Den Verlauf der Nordgrenze ließ Otto von Bismarck dabei nach pragmatischen Gesichtspunkten festlegen.
xxx/ellauri296.html on line 273: Professori Herzog kiistää pornoteollisuuden idealisoinnin. "Se vetää villaa ihmisten silmien yli", hän sanoo. ”Vaikka muutama nainen tekee pornoa ja pitää sitä hienona asiana, joka todella kunnioittaa henkilöä, pornografia on pornografiaa. Kysyin heiltä: "Tuntuiko sinusta tekeväsi pornografiaa?" He sanoivat ei. Pötyä, pornografia on pornografiaa, vaikka feminististä." Porno luo uusia rusketusrajoja paikkoihin, jotka eivät ole riippuvaisia sosiaalisista ehdoista. Hienointa on se, että tuotantoyhtiötä ei nykyään tarvita ja kuka tahansa kameran omaava voi tehdä itsestään pornonäyttelijän suuntaamalla luurin genitaaleihin.
53