ellauri008.html on line 476: Bertrand "Marriage and Morals" Russell oli ilman muuta bi. Ehtiköhän se telakoida 17v nuoremman Wittgensteinin kaa. Näistä muistelmista vaikuttaa että Conrad oli Pertin sielun veli. Pölisiköhän nytkin patjat petipuuhissa? Merimiehissä sellaisia löytyy monia, kun keskenänsä viikkokaudet merellä saavat samaan tahtiin vedellä. Valasmies Melville oli samaa maata. "Scarlet letter" Hawthorne vallan pelästyi, pois muutti naapurista.
ellauri022.html on line 339: And Hawthorne, shy as any maid,
ellauri022.html on line 715: Ne elivät sakissa kuin siouxit. Emerson oli bi, se kirjoitteli höyryisiä runoja miehelle nimeltä Gay. Melville oli sille hapan, varmaan mustasukkaisena Hawthornesta. Piti Rafua sietämättömän omahyväisenä.
ellauri048.html on line 755: Aika huono suositus, Danten kääntäminen. Långbenin isä oli taas kuinka ollakaan maineikas lawyer Mainesta, joka halusi pojastakin lawyeria. Nää fellat oli aika kermaperseitä. Hessu oli Hawthornen luokkakaveri Bowdoin Collegessa. Hessu teki pitkän Euroopan turneen ja oli aina pro-Eurooppa. Sille tarjottiin Harvardin professuuria valmistumisvaiheessa. ja se lähti Mary-vaimon kaa uudestaan Saxan turneelle. Kävi jopa Ruozissa. Tällä tiellä Mary kuoli keskenmenoon. Siitä lähti Hessun runosuoni sykkimään, uusi vaimo Fanny oli heti kiikarissa. 6 lapsen jälkeen Fanny kuoli kuinka ollakaan tulipalossa, sytytti muka mekkonsa ize palamaan. Siitä piristyneenä Hessu läxi kääntämään Dantea. Mitähän van der Valk sanoisi tästä. Aika epäilyttävää.
ellauri049.html on line 552: Monitor oli jenkkien panssarilaiva sisällissodan aikana, jonka kexi joku ruozalainen John Ericsson. Ajoi aika uppeluxissa, mutta sen vastustaja Merrimack oli vielä kehnompi. Hawthorne ja Melville suri, että panssareiden sisässä ei sotureiden enää tarvinnut olla niin urheita. Väärin, Star Warsissakin painetaan urheasti nappulaa.
ellauri052.html on line 860: His friend and protege Philip Roth has said of him, "The backbone of 20th-century American literature has been provided by two novelists—William Faulkner and Saul Bellow. Together they are the Melville, Hawthorne, and Twain of the 20th century."LOL, runkku-Roth Melvillenä tietysti.
ellauri098.html on line 502: Aristophanes, Simone de Beauvoir, Osama Bin Laden, Niels Bohr, Geoffrey Chaucer, Noam Chomsky, Alice Cooper, Leonard Cohen, Dante Alighieri, Fedor Dostojevski, Mahatma Gandhi, George Harrison, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Adolf Hitler, Carl Jung, M.L. King (taas), Marilyn Manson, Robert Mugabe, Plato, J.K. Rowling, Arthur Schopenhauer, Alexandr Solchenitsyn, Baruch Spinoza, Shirley Temple, Leo Tolstoi, Leon Trotsky, Garry Trudeau (Doonesbury), Ludi Wittgenstein, Mary Wollstonecraft
ellauri106.html on line 287: Arthur Dimmesdale is a fictional character in the 1850 romance The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne. A Puritan minister, he has fathered an illegitimate child, Pearl, with Hester Prynne and considers himself unable to reveal his sin.
ellauri106.html on line 288: Next to Hester Prynne herself, Dimmesdale is often considered Hawthorne´s finest character.
ellauri106.html on line 336: In 1860, he visited Boston and met with writers James T. Fields, James Russell Lowell, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr., Nathaniel Hawthorne, Henry David Thoreau, and Ralph Waldo Emerson. He became a personal friend to many of them, including Henry Adams, William James, Henry James, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
ellauri106.html on line 646: Olin lukenut Conradin Lordi Jimin ja Mauriacin myrkyttäjättären ja Kafkan kirjeen isälleen, olin lukenut Hawthornen Strindbergin ja Sofokleen, ja Freudin teoxia enkä siltikään ymmärtänyt että häpeä, siis lue loukattu izerakkaus, epäonnistunut narsismi, voi painaa ihmisen tällaiseen tilaan.
ellauri107.html on line 165: Oliskohan sattumaa, että Pepun alter egon Zuckermannin etunimi on Nathan ja Pepun isän etunimi Herman? Niinko Nathaniel Hawthorne ja sen pyllynnuolija Herman Melville? Tämmönen sateenkaarenvärinen diatriibi löytyi tästä Hawthorne-Melville imbgrogliosta:
ellauri107.html on line 169: Nathaniel Hawthorne (July 4, 1804 – May 19, 1864) was an American novelist, dark romantic, and short story writer. His works often focus on history, morality, and religion.
ellauri107.html on line 171: He was born in 1804 in Salem, Massachusetts, to Nathaniel Hathorne and the former Elizabeth Clarke Manning. His ancestors include John Hathorne, the only judge from the Salem witch trials who never repented his involvement in the witch hunt. He entered Bowdoin College in 1821, was elected to Phi Beta Kappa in 1824, and graduated in 1825. He published his first work in 1828, the novel Fanshawe; he later tried to suppress it, feeling that it was not equal to the standard of his later work.[2] He published several short stories in periodicals, which he collected in 1837 as Twice-Told Tales. The next year, he became engaged to Sophia Peabody. He worked at the Boston Custom House and joined Brook Farm, a transcendentalist community, before marrying Peabody in 1842. The couple moved to The Old Manse in Concord, Massachusetts, later moving to Salem, the Berkshires, then to The Wayside in Concord. The Scarlet Letter was published in 1850, followed by a succession of other novels. A political appointment as consul took Hawthorne and family to Europe before their return to Concord in 1860. Hawthorne died on May 19, 1864, and was survived by his wife and their three children.
ellauri107.html on line 173: Much of Hawthorne's writing centers on New England, many works featuring moral metaphors with an anti-Puritan inspiration. His fiction works are considered part of the Romantic movement and, more specifically, dark romanticism. His themes often center on the inherent evil and sin of humanity, and his works often have moral messages and deep psychological complexity. His published works include novels, short stories, and a biography of his college friend Franklin Pierce, the 14th President of the United States.
ellauri107.html on line 177: David Kesterson of North Texas State University delivered his lecture “Hawthorne and Melville” at the Phillips Library on September 23, 2000, giving the website one of its finest pieces of scholarship. Here are some excerpts from his talk:
ellauri107.html on line 179: The zenith of [Hawthorne and Melville’s] relationship was reached . . . when Moby-Dick was published in middle November of 1851 and was dedicated to Hawthorne [“To Nathaniel Hawthorne: In token of my admiration for his genius”]. Hawthorne’s letter to Melville [at the time], like most of those to his friend, has not been preserved, but Melville’s answer on November 17 . . . speaks of the effect Hawthorne’s letter had upon him, in terms characteristic of his impassioned utterances:
ellauri107.html on line 181: I felt pantheist then—your heart beat in my ribs and mine in yours, and both in God’s. . . . Whence come you, Hawthorne? By what right do you drink from my flagon of life? And when I put it to my lips—lo, they are yours and not mine. . . . Hence this infinite fraternity of feeling. . . . Ah! It’s a long stage, and no inn in sight, and night coming, and the body cold. But with you for a passenger, I am content and can be happy. . . .
ellauri107.html on line 183: As [Arlin]Turner says in analyzing this letter, “[Melville] was aware, it can be assumed, of the inclusiveness and interwoven imagery of his letter, and no less aware of the meaning behind the imagery. The same awareness can be assumed on the part of Hawthorne”. Edwin Haviland Miller, who interprets Melville’s affection for Hawthorne as in part sexual, says that in this passage, “the most ardent and doubtlessly one of the most painful he was ever to write, he candidly and boldly laid bare his love”. Miller goes on to say that “when Hawthorne retreated from Lenox, he retreated from Melville. How Hawthorne felt his reticences keep us from knowing, but his friend wrestled with the problems and nature of the relationship almost until the end of his life”. Turner says only that “there is evidence through the remaining forty years of Melville’s life that he thought he had been rebuffed by Hawthorne, and that he felt a genuine regret for his loss.”
ellauri107.html on line 185: Kesterson also includes a famous published Melvillian reference to Hawthorne that is at least as filled with sexual imagery as the verse of Walt Whitman. It is in the . . .
ellauri107.html on line 187: suggestive panegyric [in his 1850 review of Hawthorne’s Mosses from an Old Manse], [that] Melville writes . . . “already I feel that this Hawthorne has dropped germinous seeds into my soul. He expands and deepens down, the more I contemplate him; and further and further, shoots his strong New England roots in the hot soil of my Southern soul”.
ellauri107.html on line 189: Hawthorne had also given Melville a positive book review but characteristically expressed it with ambiguity. As Kesterson says,
ellauri107.html on line 191: . . . Hawthorne liked [Melville’s novel Typee], observing [in 1846] that . . . Melville has “that freedom of view—it would be too harsh to call it laxity of principle—which renders him tolerant of codes of morals that may be little in accordance with our own; a spirit proper enough to a young and adventurous sailor . . .”
ellauri107.html on line 193: Hawthorne is much more explicit in regard to same sex relationships and perhaps alludes to Melville’s wooing of him in his 1852 novel The Blithedale Romance. In excerpting that work for the website, I introduced it as follows:
ellauri107.html on line 195: In the following excerpts from Hawthorne's The Blithedale Romance, the Hawthorne-like character, poet and narrator Miles Coverdale, and the Melville-like character, passionate monomaniac Hollingsworth suggest Melville's influence on the novel. The first person narrator, a young man who joins a major enterprise with mostly adventure-seeking motives, certainly calls to mind narrator Ishmael in Melville's Moby-Dick. The dark and brawny Hollingsworth, bearing a physical resemblance to Melville, cares for Coverdale and seeks his partnership, moreover, in an intensity that seems to parallel Melville's evident affection for and desire for intimacy with Hawthorne. The sharp, mysterious break in the relationships between the two authors and the fictional pair constitute yet another likeness.
ellauri107.html on line 208: Coverdale declares, "I loved Hollingsworth, as has already been enough expressed." He adds, "If . . .[Priscilla] thought him beautiful, it was no wonder. I often thought him so, with the expression of tender, human care, and gentlest sympathy . . . ." And in Hawthorne's most explicitly homoerotic allusion, Coverdale notes, "the footing, on which we all associated at Blithedale, was widely different from that of conventional society. While inclining us to the soft affections of the Golden Age, it seemed to authorize any individual, of either sex, to fall in love with any other, regardless of what would elsewhere be judged suitable and prudent."
ellauri107.html on line 214: Actually, the reader would have to be remarkably obtuse not to recognize the sexual tension between Coverdale and Hollingsworth. If only we could know what Melville thought when he read it! Certainly, Melville was aware that Brook Farm in Roxbury, Massachusetts, which Blithedale represents, had enjoyed the company of Hawthorne as a communal society member for most of 1841. Perhaps he also knew that substantial portions of Coverdale’s first person narration are taken directly from Hawthorne’s Brook Farm journals, and he would certainly know better than we the extent to which the novel may also represent allusions to Hawthorne’s and his experiences together during the year before the publication of Blithedale.
ellauri107.html on line 218: The major occurrence in Melville’s life . . . during the writing of Moby-Dick was the growing friendship with Nathaniel Hawthorne . . . . We are reminded that throughout the fall and winter of 1850, and summer of 1851, Hawthorne and Melville were visiting and writing to each other. . Hawthorne encapsulating their conversation [of August 1, 1851] by writing in his journal: “Melville and I had a talk about time and eternity, things of this world and of the next, and books, and publishers, and all possible and impossible matters, that lasted pretty deep into the night . . . .”
ellauri107.html on line 220: [A Tanglewood Tale] dramatizes the developing friendship of Nathaniel Hawthorne and Herman Melville during the 1850-1851 period when both authors resided in Berkshire County, Massachusetts. In spite of their strong attraction to each other, they become estranged by fundamental differences. Puritan-in-spite-of himself Hawthorne is pressed too far when worldly former whaler Melville becomes explicit about shipboard liaisons with fellow sailors. Though the play suggests Hawthorne is curious about same sex relations, the reserved New Englander flees Melville and the Berkshires rather than pursue the subject.
ellauri107.html on line 222: Melville’s concluding words are from his “Monody,” a poem that is thought to express his deep personal loss when learning of Hawthorne’s death in 1864:
ellauri107.html on line 236: Melville alludes to a guy named Billy Budd to Hawthorne’s short story “The Birthmark” and draws parallelograms between the two authors in regard to their interests in the relative good and evil sides of the front and back. Here is the portion that relates most clearly to the two authors’ relationship:
ellauri107.html on line 244: Claggart’s repressed, closeted attraction to Billy finds parallels with some interpretations of Hawthorne’s evident spurning of Melville’s too intimate attentions and Hawthorne’s character in The Blithedale Romance Coverdale’s similar rejection of the invitation from Holingsworth to be his “friend of friends, forever.” For Melville, Hawthorne’s Arthur Dimmesdale’s agonizing acknowledgement of adultery must have seemed a stunning parallel with what later generations would term “coming out of the closet.” Whether Hawthorne himself were a closeted gay man, it is clear that Melville was relatively open in his affections for the senior author and that those affections were somehow turned away and seem to have left a wound that never fully healed. The evils of the closet constitute a subtext in Billy Budd that may well have brought to its author’s mind the sad sundering of his closeness with Nathaniel Hawthorne.
ellauri107.html on line 366: Hawthornen tapaisia ihmisiä, viisaita vainajia. Hiljaisuus korkoa korolle kasvavana omaisuutena. Siinä mies joka osasi panna töpinäxi. 3 gallonaa luomumaitoa. Tietämätön hengen syvyyxistä. Kuoleman ahistuxen aikaansaama sexuaalinen kaipaus. Jyrkät jenkkiposkipäät ja leuka ja pitkä ehdottoman naisellinen kaula. Siitä näki kuinka leikkisä hiän osasi olla. Vaikka lukutaidoton ja totaalisen erilainen kuin hiäntä Viagran voimalla bylsivä sivistynyt proffa jonka isoon päähän mahtui kahden kuolleen kielen sanakirjat.
ellauri107.html on line 368: Alkaa näyttää tosiaan ettää Faunia on nuorimies, ja Fläkki on sen herrasmies reikäperse "Ralph". Mannin Aschenbachiin ja Tadzioon koko ajan vinkataan. Ja Hawthorne, selvä pyy! Valkoinen valas pyrkii veneeseen. Tämä vielä:
ellauri118.html on line 410: 1Aviorikos kirjallisena topoksena on ollut useankin tutkimuksen aiheena, mutta ei yhdenkään narratologisen tutkimuksen. Edelleen painavin kirjallisuustieteellinen esitys aiheesta on Tony Tannerin ambivalentin psykoanalyyttis-strukturalistinen Adultery in the Novel (1979), joka lähestyy aviorikosta sekä yhteiskunnallisena että kirjallis-kielellisenä transgressiona. Viittaan Tannerin tutkimukseen Rouva Bovarya käsittelevässä luvussa. Muut laajemmat esitykset kirjallisesta aviorikoksesta ovat tekstianalyyttisesti merkityksettömämpiä: Bill Overtonin Fictions of Female Adultery (2002) keskittyy aviorikoskirjallisuuden historiallisiin ja kulttuurisiin reunaehtoihin sekä soimaa aiempaa tutkimusta (lähinnä Tanneria) liiasta kieli- ja kerrontakeskeisyydestä; Patricia Mainardin Husbands, Wives, and Lovers (2003) on kulttuurihistoriallinen esitys aviorikoksesta taiteessa ja Overtonin tutkimusta rikkaampi esitys esimerkiksi aviorikoksen lainsäädännöllisistä ja kulttuurisista kytköksistä; niin ikään Judith Armstrongin The Novel of Adultery (1976), Naomi Segalin The Adulteress’s Child (1992) ja Maria R. Ripponin Judgement and Justification in the Nineteenth-Century Novel of Adultery (2002) sivuuttavat kerronnan kysymykset ja keskittyvät kulttuuris-poliittiseen kontekstiin ja pelkästään referentiaalisen tason temaattiseen toistoon (kuten siihen että aviorikoksesta syntyvä lapsi on mitä todennäköisimmin tyttö). Oma lukunsa ovat vielä tiettyihin aikakausiin ja kielialueisiin (esimerkiksi ranskalaiseen hoviromantiikkaan) keskittyvät tutkimukset. Näistä maininnan arvoinen on ainakin Donald J. Greinerin Adultery in the American Novel (1985), vertaileva tutkimus Updiken, Hawthornen ja Jamesin avionrikkojista. Kulttuuri- ja myyttihistoriallinen klassikko, Denis de Rougemontin L’Amour et l’Occident (1939) on myös tutkimus uskottomuusfiktioista (Tristanin ja Isolden perillisistä), sillä Rougemontilla juuri aviorikos on länsimaisen ”rakkauden rakastamisen” huipentuma, transgressiivinen olotila joka katoaa, jos siitä tehdään instituutio. Käsitys uskottomuudesta kulttuurisena rajailmiönä ja juuri siitä syystä kertomustaiteen pulppuavana lähteenä yhdistää siis Rougemontia ja Tanneria, mutta jostain syystä Tanner ei viittaa Rougemontin teokseen. Mixihän? [Heitän tähän heti sen edellä mainitun oivalluxen, että romantiikka on sitä kun panettaa muttei pääse pukille.]
ellauri159.html on line 956: INFJs have an inner world filled with ideas, symbols, and possibilities. They are passionate, idealistic, and have a deep concern for others. INFJ writers include Plato, Mary Wollstonecraft, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Dante Alighieri, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Agatha Christie, Charlotte Brontë, J.K. Rowling, Carl Jung, and Leo Tolstoy. Learn more about how INFJs write here.
ellauri188.html on line 392: 31-vuotiaana Melville tapasi Pittsfieldissä kesällä 1850 46-vuotiaan Nathaniel Hawthornen, jonka kanssa "ystävystyi". Kirjailijat viettivät paljon aikaa keskustellen komeista intellektuelleista ja filosofisista asioista. Hawthorne myös vaikutti Melvillen seuraavan romaanin Moby Dick sisältöön, sillä hän kannusti Melvilleä tekemään siitäkin allegorisen tarinan suoran valaanpyyntikertomuksen sijaan. Ai siis mitä? kysyi Hermanni. No kikkeli, kikkeli, tietysti, selvitti Nat kärsimättömästi. Vaikka kirja on nykyään todella tunnettu, omana aikanaan se oli paha pettymys. Sitä myytiin koko Melvillen elinaikana vain 3 000 kappaletta. Hänen seuraava romaaninsa Pierre oli vieläkin suurempi floppi.
ellauri258.html on line 126: Sivumennen sanoen, "dignity" on oikeistolainen ällösana, jota on suomittu jo useassa albumissa, erit. Tsihirunkkuṟallin yhteydessä. Oireellisesti, sitä käyttävät mm. paavi Leo työläisistä, Paavi Leo (sama mies), tarkastaja Gently, Unabomber, Marvin, Derek Parfit, Pete Mencken, käsineiti Peg Atwood, Iisakki Bashevis (Mencken sanoo ettei juutalaisilla ole sitä, Bashevis begs to differ), Pascal, Gud (som taler ud), Olli Saxi, Ransu Silava, mustarastaat, De Löllö, joku jumalinen Dr. Dodd, Mark Twain, joku taidekriitikko (puuttuu Goyan Mantoilta parvekkeella, toisin kuin Maneetin, joilla on sylikoirokin), Ernesto "Che" Hemingway, Alex Stubb Maidan-demonstraatioista, Kv filosofien päivän ohjelma 2021, Tytti Yli-Viikarin kainalossa ollut Hawthornen kirja Scarlet Letter, vihan banaanit eli kunniamurhaajat, Lionel Drivel, Alfred Apple Lolitasta, King David kuuma neitonen hot water bottlena. Mikä on tässä yhteistä? Kermaperseily rupusakin kustannuxella, eräänlaista moraalista charitya.
ellauri332.html on line 425: Tämä raina poikkeaa liian kauas kaappihinuri Nathanial Hawthornen vuonna 1850 julkaistusta romaanista vuoden 1660 puritaanisesta siirtokunnasta. Vuoden 1995 elokuva näyttää tietämättömältä. Sitä tervehdittiin pelätyllä elokuvakritiikillä, "tahattomasti hauska". Tänä aikana Demi Mooren nimi teltassa oli kuin jinx. Lyhyesti sanottuna hänen esityksensä Hester Prynnestä osoittautui vahingossa humoristiseksi.
ellauri332.html on line 435: Mixi jenkkikahvat nauroivat pää punaisena filkkaversiolle Hawthornen Scarlet Letteristä? Kazotaanpa Rotten Tomaateista! Mielipiteitä? Mitä kriitikot sanovat?
ellauri332.html on line 443: Hawthorne's moral seriousness gets lost in a sea of slush.
ellauri332.html on line 447: "Freely adapted from the novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne," the credits say cautiously. I'll say.
ellauri332.html on line 450: For anyone who's ever wondered why Hawthorne left out the mute servants, red cockatoos, and rolls in the proverbial hay. As Hawthorne himself would say: "Ignominious!" "Deththpicable!"
ellauri332.html on line 464: Täh? Buahaha! Gotcha! Ruodittavana onkin jonkun Joffen 1995 "romanttinen" Hollywood versio Hawthornen sepustuxesta! Eikä Wimin onneton 1973 pläjäys. Sitä ei varmaan jenkeissä edes näytetty. LOL!
ellauri332.html on line 475: Nathaniel Hawthornes (1850) Bestseller wurde immer wieder verfilmt, so 1934 von Robert G. Vignola und 1926 von Victor Sjöström. Trotzdem nahm sich auch Wim Wenders mit dem von ihm mit gegründeten Filmverlag der Autoren 1973 dem Sujet an. Während Hawthorne die Probleme von Einwanderern der zweiten Generation in den Mittelpunkt stellte, setzte der Regisseur seinen Focus auf den persönlichen Konflikt der Figuren. Senta Berger war 1973 ein international bekannter Filmstar. Sie legt als
ellauri332.html on line 486: Mutta jos vika onkin Hawthornen alkup. kässärissä? Ehkä se on perseestä?
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 662: The Scarlet Letter: A Romance is a work of historical fiction by American author Nathaniel Hawthorne, published in 1850. Set in Puritan Massachusetts Bay Colony during the years 1642 to 1649, the novel tells the story of Hester Prynne, who conceives a daughter through an affair and then struggles to create a new life of repentance and dignity. Containing a number of religious and historic allusions, the book explores themes of legalism, sin, and guilt.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 697: Hawthorne Nathaniel">Nathaniel Hawthorne (July 4, 1804 – May 19, 1864) was an American novelist, dark romantic, and short story writer. His works often focus on history, morality, and religion.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 700: He worked at the Boston Custom House and joined Brook Farm, a transcendentalist community, before marrying Peabody in 1842. The couple moved to The Old Manse in Concord, Massachusetts, later moving to Salem, the Berkshires, then to The Wayside in Concord. The Scarlet Letter was published in 1850, followed by a succession of other novels. A political appointment as consul took Hawthorne and family to Europe before their return to Concord in 1860.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 702: Eikös se Herman Melvillen "I rather not" kaveri ollut kanssa töissä tullissa? Niin ja Herman izekin? Sieltäkös se tunsi Hawthornen, jota se sittemmin ahdisteli homofiilisesti sen keittiössä?
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 708: Elmer Kennedy-Andrews remarks that Hawthorne in "The Custom-house" sets the context for his story and "tells us about ´romance´, which is his preferred generic term to describe The Scarlet Letter, as his subtitle for the book – ´A Romance´ – would indicate." In this introduction, Hawthorne describes a space between materialism and "dreaminess" that he calls "a neutral territory, somewhere between the real world and fairy-land, where the Actual and the Imaginary may meet, and each imbues itself with nature of the other". This combination of "dreaminess" and realism gave the author space to explore major themes.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 728: Poe kirjoitti yleensä myönteisesti, mutta osa arvosteluista oli ilkeitä ja toi hänelle vihamiehiä. Kirjallisuusarvostelijana Poe arvioi myönteisesti esimerkiksi nuoren Charles Dickensin teoksia sekä haastatteli Dickensiä tämän käydessä Yhdysvalloissa. Myös Nathaniel Hawthornen tuotannosta hän kirjoitti lehteen myönteisiä arvosteluja.
xxx/ellauri086.html on line 758: Yhdysvaltalaiskirjailijoista esimerkiksi Hawthornelle ja Melvillelle Poe antoi moniselitteisen hyvän ja pahan vastakkaisasettelun, josta tuli hallitseva teema yhdysvaltalaiseen kirjallisuuteen.
xxx/ellauri120.html on line 216: Punainen A-kirjain Tytin kainalossa tahtoi sanoa että se on mielestään kuin Hawthornen Scarlet Letterin Hester Prynne. Olikohan Pöysti size pastori Dimmersdale? Razastiko Tomi kapybaralla kuin kuvan apina? Pöysti ize putkahti julkisuuteen Haju Pisilän sote-kähmintöjen vanavedessä. Vitun torakat.
xxx/ellauri125.html on line 493: Pepun heroja on Hawthorne, Melville ja Thoreau. Aiheina avionrikkojat, homopetterit ja veronkiertäjät. Se on amerikkalaista individualismia. Peppua pelottaa kamalasti kuolema. Kaddishista se ei muuta ymmärrä kuin että taas on 1 juutalainen kuollut. Se on traagista, kuten Niklas sanoisi.
xxx/ellauri129.html on line 812: Hawthorne" title="Nathaniel Hawthorne">Nathaniel Hawthorne
xxx/ellauri179.html on line 623: What evidence does Novick offer for the James-Holmes “affair”? Just two French words James uses in his long and vivid notebook entry recalling his early days in Boston, where his family settled in a brick house in Ashburton Place near the State House. The words are l’initiation première–“first initiation.” In the entry, James is writing generally of the “rite of passage” that inaugurated his literary career. He describes the strong emotions he felt at the assassination of Lincoln (on James’$2 22nd birthday); how he wept when Hawthorne died; and the dawning sense of freedom experienced after the war’s end. He mentions also his first book review on English novel-writing, published in the North American Review, whose editors paid him $12, praised his writing, and asked for more. He does mention Holmes, but only to describe a brief visit he made to Holmes’ mother to ask how her son was faring in England, and his own fierce envy of Holmes for traveling abroad while James remained at home.
xxx/ellauri312.html on line 36: Ensinnäkin hummerin elimet ovat nurinkurisessa järjestyksessä. Perse on pään paikalla ja pää pyrstössä kuten Melvillen ja Hawthornen junassa. No ei oikeasti, läppä läppä. Lisää yxityiskohtia voit lukea v. 1967 syyskuun Kalutuista Paloista Rauhixen hyyskässä. Mutta kylläpä se pyrstö maistuu silti hyvältä! Ennen kalpeanaamojen tuloa inkkarien rannat kuhisivat näitä äyriäisiä. Nyt rannat kuhisevat valkonaamoja ja äyriäiset ovat vaarantuneita. Punanahat on sukupuuttoon tapettu niiltä rannoilta jo aikapäiviä. Hummeripojan kandeisi käyttää sosiaalisen median suodattimia. Niistä saa poskiin punaväriä ilman sitä epämukavaa keittovaihetta.
58