ellauri042.html on line 860: Klemens Aleksandrialainen (oik. Titus Flavius Clemens; n. 150 – n. 215) oli Aleksandrian kirkon jäsen ja ensimmäinen varsinainen kristillinen filosofi. Hänet lasketaan kirkkoisien joukkoon. Klemens oli kotoisin Ateenasta. Hänen kääntymisestään ei ole tietoa, mutta kristityksi tulonsa jälkeen hän matkusti Etelä-Italiaan, Syyriaan ja Palestiinaan tapaamaan kristittyjä opettajia. Lopulta hän päätyi Aleksandriaan, jonne hän asettui aloilleen. Aleksandriassa Klemens tapasi oppi-isänsä Pantainoksen, joka johti tunnettua Aleksandrian kateketiikkakoulua. Pantainos oli stoalaisuudesta kristityksi kääntynyt opettaja.
ellauri043.html on line 3445: Joojoo, teatterissa, keskellä päivää, lokakuun kolmantena (Helmin synttäri!) se huusi yhtäkkiä: Keisaria listitään! ja selosti vaihe vaiheelta: Nyt se rullaa lattialla! ouz! kylläpä se kamppailee! se nousee ylös! se koittaa paeta! ovet on kiinni! Ai! se on loppu nyt! Siinä se on kanttuvei!Ja sinä päivänä just, Titus Flavius Domitianus salamurhattiin, kuten tiedätte.
ellauri184.html on line 528: Classical, Hellenistic, and Roman culture found circumcision to be cruel and repulsive. In the Roman Empire, circumcision was regarded as a barbaric and disgusting custom. The consul Titus Flavius Clemens was condemned to death by the Roman Senate in 95 CE for, according to the Talmud, circumcising himself and converting to Judaism. The Emperor Hadrian (117–138) forbade circumcision. Overall, the rite of circumcision was especially execrable in Classical civilization, also because it was the custom to spend an hour a day or so exercising nude in the gymnasium and in Roman baths, therefore Jewish men did not want to be seen in public deprived of their foreskins.
ellauri334.html on line 356: Was Josephus Flavius a traitor to the Jewish people?
ellauri370.html on line 88: According to the Hebrew Bible, Amalek was the son of Eliphaz (himself the son of Esau, ancestor of the Edomites and the brother of Israel) and Eliphaz's concubine Timna. Timna was a Whorite and sister of Lotan. According to a midrash, Timna was a princess who tried to convert to Judaism. However, she was rejected by Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. She replied she would rather be a handmaiden to the dregs of Israel than be a mistress of another gentile nation. To punish the Patriarchs for their attitudes, Timna birthed Amalek, whose descendants would cause Israel much distress. This Amalek was also the product of an incestuous union since Eliphaz was Timna's stepfather, according to 1 Chronicles 1:36, after he committed adultery with the wife of Seir the Horite, who was Timna's biological father. First-century Roman-Jewish scholar and historian Flavius Josephus refers to Amalek as a "bastard" (νόθος) in a derogatory sense. 'Amalek' oli vähän kuin 'Vanja' suomalaisille.
ellauri408.html on line 359: Nor did Herod massacre babies, or the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who wrote about Herod, would have mentioned such an outrage.
ellauri408.html on line 426: All that spectacular nonsense was followed by Peter healing every sick person in Jerusalem and all the surrounding cities with his shadow, and yet no one breathed a single word of it, not even the famous Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who grew up in Jerusalem while these alleged “miracles” were taking place! Why did Josephus go on and on about much lesser figures when the greatest miracle worker of all time lived just down the street from him?
ellauri411.html on line 245: Koko pohjoisvaltio on eteläjuutalaisten ilkeän propagandan mustaama. Pohjoisvaltiosta kotoisin ollut Jeesus peukutti samaritaaneja, ja sixi kai se oli sanhedrinin mielestä epäilyttävä terroristijäbä. Erst seit der Ptolemäerzeit (3./2. Jahrhundert v. Chr.) wurden Konflikte zwischen Samaritanern und Juden greifbar, die dann auch die Geschichtskonstruktion des Flavius Josephus prägten, der die Verhältnisse seiner eigenen Zeit in die Perserzeit rückprojiziert hat.
xxx/ellauri154.html on line 216: In the New Testament, both Matthew (14:1-11) and Mark (6:14-29) tell of the famous banquet story in which Herodias, having grown angry at John the Baptist for saying she could not marry her ex-husband’s brother, asks her daughter to request John’s head from her half-uncle as payment for her dance. Although neither of these sources mention Salome by name, we can learn of her from Flavius Josephus’ Jewish Antiquities of the year 93-94 (Book XVIII, Chapter 5, 4).
xxx/ellauri173.html on line 162: Au IIIe siècle avant J-C, l’ingénieur grec Philon de Byzance classe les jardins suspendus de Babylone, au sud de l’actuel Irak, parmi les sept merveilles du monde antique. Le premier à les évoquer est le prêtre babylonien Bérose (IVe siècle avant J-C). Il attribue leur construction à Nabuchodonosor II, qui les aurait créés pour son épouse persane Amytis, laquelle se languissait de la verdure de son pays natal. Le texte de Bérose est perdu, mais il subsiste sous forme de fragments chez des historiens et géographes du Ier siècle avant J-C, tels Flavius Josèphe, Diodore de Sicile et Strabon ; on le retrouve également chez Eusèbe de Césarée (265-339 de l’ère chrétienne). Toutefois, à l’exception de Bérose, aucun texte babylonien ne mentionne les jardins suspendus, ou du moins pas un seul n’a été retrouvé. Aucune des inscriptions relatant les grands chantiers de Nabuchodonosor II ne contient une référence à un jardin surélevé. Dans ses Histoires, le géographe et historien grec Hérodote (480-425 avant notre ère), qui a visité Babylone un siècle seulement après la mort de Nabuchodonosor, ne les évoque pas non plus lorsqu’il décrit la ville. Les murailles, la tour de Babel ou Ziggurat d’Etemenanki, les palais royaux et autres constructions de la ville antique ont été identifiés par les fouilles archéologiques ou sont attestés dans les textes cunéiformes. Mais cela n’a pas été le cas pour les jardins.
10